Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout52MF NOTE INTERSTATE PROPH � 52�•YIF R f MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 1, 1977 H. CASE NO. TT 9396, PRELUDE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, APPLICANT Page Eleven Request. for approval of a Tentative Tract Map for a 55-lot condominium subdivision on an approximate 8.94-acre parcel located in the PR-7,S.P. District and situated northerly of and adjacent to the intersection of Park View Drive and Fair- haven Drive. Mr. Williams again recommended a continuance due to the Commission's pre- vious action on the Development Plan for this project since the Zoning Ordinance requires that a development plan be acted on prior to action on the tract map. Chairman Wilson opened the Public Hearing and asked the applicant if he was in agreement with the continuance. Mr. Gittelson stated the continuance was acceptable and he was sure that the matters could be resolved between the staff and himself. w Chairman Wilson asked if there was anyone present wishing to speak either Q in FAVOR of or OPPOSED to the continuance. Being no one, he closed the Public w j Hearing and asked the Commission for their feelings. ji li3 Commissioner Reading moved that the Planning Commission continue the Public Hearing on Case No. TT 9396 to the meeting of March 15, 1977. Commis- sioner Kelly seconded the motion; motion unanimously carried. VII. OLD BUSINESS A. CASE NO. 52MF DEEP CA14YON LTD., APPLICANT Request for approval of design review of a 200-unit condominium development located in the PR-5,N District and situated at the southwest corner of the intersection of Deep Canyon Road and 44th Avenue. Mr. Williams stated that this case was related to the development plan and tract map (DP 02-77 and TT 9144) for which the Planning Commission had ap- proved the request for withdrawal made by the applicant. Therefore, staff was recommending that the Commission also accept the request for withdrawal on this case to allow for a re -design of the project. . Chairman Wilson asked if there were any questions. There were none. Commissioner Kelly moved, and Commissioner Mills seconded, that the Planning Commission accept, without prejudice, the applicant's request for withdrawal on Case No. 52MF; motion unanimously carried. VIII. NEW BUSINESS A. CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST BY THE COACHELLA VALLEY COUNTY WATER DISTRICT FOR DETERMINATION OF COMPLIANCE TO THE CITY'S GENERAL PLAN FOR PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION PROJECT CONSISTING OF A 900-FOOT EXTENSION OF DOMESTIC WATER DISTRIBUTION MAIN IN IRONWOOD STREET, VERBA SANTA DRIVE, AND BETWEEN VERBA SANTA AND OCOTILLO DRIVES. Mr. Williams explained to the Commission that staff did find these projects to be in conformance with the Palm Desert General Plan and, therefore, recom- mended Planning Commission adoption of Resolution No. 220, approving same. Being no questions of staff, Chairman Wilson asked the Commission for their feelings. Commissioner Reading moved that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 220. Commissioner Mills seconded the motion; motion unanimously carried. Vv, Gc'fl � off lipmna ra =o��orrtb 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 REPORT OF AANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE March 7, 1977 APPLICANT DEEP CANYON LTD 2101 East 4th Street, Suite 210 Santa Ana, CA. 92705 CASE NO. DP 02-77, TT 9144, and 52MF (HIDDEN *PALMS The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of March 1, 1977 CONTINUED TO X C REQUEST WITHDRAWN WITHOUT PREJUDICE. APPROVED BY PLANNING COITMISSION RESOLUTION PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF FOR CONCURRENCE WITH THE PLANNING COiMISSION DECISION. PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF FOR PUBLIC HEARING. Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Environmental Services, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. PAUL A. WILLIAMS, Secretary Palm Desert Planning Commission :o �• e�• 'c •ei�•i�o• �iV •i'lY^ :� .ua MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 1, 1977 Page Eleven H. CASE NO. TT 9396, PRELUDE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, APPLICANT Request for approval of a Tentative Tract Map for a 55-lot condominium subdivision on an approximate 8.94-acre parcel located in the PR-7,S.P. District and situated northerly of and adjacent to the intersection of Park View Drive and Fair- haven Drive. Mr. Williams again recommended a continuance due to the Commission's pre- vious action on the Development Plan for this project since the Zoning Ordinance requires that a development plan be acted on prior to action on the tract map. Chairman Wilson opened the Public Hearing and asked the applicant if he was in agreement with the continuance. Mr. Gittelson stated the continuance was acceptable and he was sure that the matters could be resolved between the staff and himself. Chairman Wilson asked if there was anyone present wishing to speak either in FAVOR of or OPPOSED to the continuance. Being no one, he closed the Public Hearing and asked the Commission for their feelings. Commissioner Reading moved that the Planning Commission continue the Public Hearing on Case No. TT 9396 to the meeting of March 15, 1977. Commis- sioner Kelly seconded the motion; motion unanimously carried. VII. OLD BUSINESS A. CASE NO. 52ME DEEP CA14YON LTD., APPLICANT Request for approval of design review of a 200-unit condominium development located in the PR-5,N District and situated at the southwest corner of the intersection of Deep Canyon Road and 44th Avenue. Mr. Williams stated that this case was related to the development plan and tract map (DP 02-77 and TT 9144) for which the Planning Commission had ap- proved the request for withdrawal made by the applicant. Therefore, staff was recommending that the Commission also accept the request for withdrawal on this case to allow for a re -design of the project. Chairman Wilson asked if there were any questions. There were none. Commissioner Kelly moved, and Commissioner Mills seconded, that the Planning Commission accept, without prejudice, the applicant's request for withdrawal on Case No. 52MF; motion unanimously carried. VIII. NEW BUSINESS A. CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST BY THE COACHELLA VALLEY COUNTY WATER DISTRICT FOR DETERMINATION OF COMPLIANCE TO THE CITY'S GENERAL PLAN FOR PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION PROJECT CONSISTING OF A 900-FOOT EXTENSION OF DOMESTIC WATER DISTRIBUTION MAIN IN IRONWOOD STREET, VERBA SANTA DRIVE, AND BETWEEN VERBA SANTA AND OCOTILLO DRIVES. Mr. Williams explained to the Commission that staff did find these projects to be in conformance with the Palm Desert General Plan and, therefore, recom- mended Planning Commission adoption of Resolution No. 220, approving same. Being no questions of staff, Chairman Wilson asked the Commission for their feelings. Commissioner Reading moved that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 220. Commissioner Mills seconded the motion; motion unanimously carried. 5 2iryL' -- ` francisco j. urrutia, a.i.a. & associates ,r #`- architecture land planning 73-350 el paseo • suite 201 palm desert, california 92260 714 — 346-0593 February 24, 1977 Mr. Paul Williams, Director of Environmental Services CITY OF PALM DESERT 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, California 92260 Re: Hidden Palms Development Dear Paul, As a result of our discussion Commission and City Planning that our original approach to is not acceptable to the City It will be potentially necess re -design the project as per ion's requests. with the Planning staff, it is obvious the above project Planning Commission. ary to re -program and the Planning Commiss- Therefore, since time is now a problem, on behalf of the applicant, Deep Canyon LTD, we are request- ing that the Hidden Palms Project be withdrawn from the Planning Commission's Agenda of March 1, 1977 to allow further study and possible redesign. This request would pertain to the Development and Tentative plans. 5an erely,cisc J. Urrutia, A.I.A. cc: Interstate Properties, Inc. FJU:sd S2mF Dp o2•'7'7 Tr 9/Vy 45-300 CLUB DRIVE INDIAN WELLS, CALIFORNIA 92260 February 28, 1977 Mr, Paul A. Williams Director of Environmental Services City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, California 92260 RE: Tract 9144 and Development Plan 02-77 Dear Paul: (714) 345-2831 Subject matter was reviewed and discussed February 24th by the Indian Wells Planning Commission. Their recommendations are being forwarded to our City Council for their March 3, 1977 meeting. The Indian Wells Planning Commission's consensus of opinion is as follows: 1) Development Plan 02 -77 appears acceptable as proposed. 2) Tract 9144, which is coincident to the Indian Wells City limit, caused four items to be presented to the Palm Desert Planning Commission for their consideration. (a) Subject property is a portion of the proposed Indian Wells flood control system. Tentative plans require a channel, 300 feet in width, to occupy space at the western limits of the City of Indian Wells. (150' in City of Palm Desert -- 1501 in City of Indian Wells) (b) Increase dwelling size from 1600 to 2000 square feet to be compatible with Indian Wells requirements, (c) Density should not exceed 3. 6 units per acre. (d) Screening, on the east side of Tract 9144 shall consist of either landscaping or block wall. We will forward to you the City Council comments as soon as they are available. Thank you for the opportunity to review. Very truly yours, RECEIVED CITY OF INDIAN WELLS �f r / ern •,. /�' �•� ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES lIA$RY I-1. S ITZ CITY OF PALM DESERT Director of Buildina R, Planning MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION SPECIAL MEETING Commissioner Reading moved that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 213, as recommended by staff. Commissioner Mills seconded the motion; motion unanimously carried. VII. OLD BUSINESS None VIII. NEW BUSINESS A. Consideration of a Proposed City Council Resolution amending the EIR procedures. Mr. Williams explained the request to the Commission and stated that sweeping changes had been made to the entire Environmental Impact Report (EIR) procedures. Therefore, staff was recommending approval to the City Council of the resolution pertaining to the amendment of the EIR procedures. Chairman Wilson asked if there were any questions of staff at this time. Being none, he asked the Commission for their feelings on the matter. Commissioner Mills moved that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 214, as recommended by staff. Commissioner Reading seconded the motion; motion unanimously carried. IX. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ITEMS A. Review of Cases approved at the Design Review Board meetings of January 11, 1977 and January 19, 1977. Mr. Williams stated that before getting involved in the Design Review Board items, staff was recommending continuance of Case No. 52MF as it was related to Case No. DP 02-77, which the Plan- ning Commission had just continued to the March 1, 1977 meeting. Further, staff was recommending a continuance of Case No. 23SA to the meeting of February 15, 1977, as the applicant was not able to be present at tonight's meeting. Mr. Williams then asked Mr. Fleshman to present the remaining Design Review Board cases. The first case presented by Mr. Fleshman was Case No. 46C and he explained to the Commission that this was a request for preliminary approval of a 160-room resort hotel development for ROBERT GOODEN. Mr. Fleshman gave a detailed description of the project. Said de- scription included a presentation to the Commission of the elevations and colors & materials board. Commissioner Berkey asked about the roofing material. Mr. Urrutia explained that the roofing material was metal with an enamel finish, a flat finish, and traditional architecture (turned roof). January 25, 1977 Page Fifteen 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONdF (7IS) 346-0611 REPORT OF AANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE January 27, 1977 APPLICANT DEEP CANYON LTD. 2101 East 4th Street, Suite 210 Santa Ana, California 92705 CASE NO. TT 9144, DP 02-77, and 52MF The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of January 25, 1977 XXX CONTINUED TO March 1, 1977 DENIED APPROVED BY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF CONCURRENCE WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION. PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF FOR PUBLIC HEARING. Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Environmental Services, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. PAUL A. WILLIAMS, Secretary Palm Desert Planning Commission Applicant 9M3UE*XXWA1XXXXAXXXiii(X)LUX Harold Housley-73-770 Highway 111,Suite 8 W Frank Urrutia - 72-350 El Paseo 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 9226O TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION REPORT JAN I 'ie Date: January 11, 1977 REPORT 0:q: 200-Unit Planned Residential Development CASE NO.: 52MF ZONE: PR-5, N. LOCATION: Southeast corner of Deep Canyon Road and 44th Avenue APPLICANT: Deep Canyon Ltd., by Frank J. Urrutia, A.I.A. NATURE OF APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary floor plans, site plan, elevations, and landscaping DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION: After reviewing the submitted plans and the presentations by the staff and by the applicant, the DRB ao roves this project, subject to the attached conditions. Date of Action: January 11, 1977 Motion Made By: Minturn Seconded By: Buccino Vote: 3-0 (Urrutia abstained) Reasons for Negative Vote (s): (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen (Z5) days of the date of the decision.) STAFF COMMENTS: M January 11, 1977 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO. 52MF 1. The development of the property shall conform substantially with that as shown on plot plan marked Exhibits A-G, on file with the Department of Environmental Services, Case No. 52MF, unless otherwise amended by the following conditions. 2. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, for any condominium structure, a subdivision shall be recorded conforming substantially with said Exhibit A. 3. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for construction of any use con- templated by this approval, the applicant shall first obtain permits and/or clearance from the following public agencies: County Dept. of Public Health Department of Fire Protection (Indio) County Road Department Coachella Valley County Water District Palm Desert Planning Commission Regional Water Quality Control Board #7 Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be pre- sented to the Building and Safety Department at the time of the issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. 4. Final landscaping; grading, lighting, fencing, amenities, trash storage, walkway layout, and irrigation plan shall be submitted through the Design Review Board Process. The building permit when issued shall include the grading, lighting, amenities, trash storage, walkways, swimming pool equip- ment, and irrigation systems. No final inspection or occupancy shall be given by the Department of Environmental Services to this project until the aforementioned approved plans and construction shall have been completed. 5. The following Fire Protection Requirements shall apply: The applicant shall conform to all requirements and improvements deemed necessary by the Riverside County Department of Fire Protection and Planning and the City of Palm Desert. 6. Construction of the development permitted hereby may be done progressively in stages, provided adequate vehicular access is constructed for all dwel- ling units and further provided that such stage development conforms sub- stantially with the intent and purpose of this approval, and that the re- creation facilities and off-street automobile parking be completed as a part of Phase I. 7. The sewage disposal system shall be submitted to and approved by the Coachella Valley County Water District prior to issuance of a building permit. 8. This approval shall be used within one (1) year after final proceedings before the City Council, otherwise it shall become null and void and of no effect whatsoever. By "use" is meant recordation of a subdivision map and beginning of construction of a portion of the project. 9. Prior to the effective date of any City Council approval of this tract, the applicant shall agree in writing to all conditions of approval. AGREEMENT I accept and agree, prior- to use of this permit or approval, to comply with all the conditions set forth, and understand that the Department of Building & Safety will not issue a building permit or allow occupancy on the use permitted until this signed confirmation has been received by the Department of Environmental Services. Deep Canyon Ltd. arLimited Partnership Interstate Proper4, Inc. General Partner JanuarX 20 1977 By: (Date)i Ignature ident Mervin B CITY C :ALM DESERT x S-2T5 PRICKLY PEAR L. PALM DESERT CA.92260 (714)bse•0911 DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION APP. NO. DATE REC. (DO AfOT WRITE /A( THIS SPACE) 1PPLICANT (Please prlmt) Interstate Properties Inc — nEEP CAM`tl7W (NAryt E) 101 Past 4t-h StrPpt S»iteQlO 7ld/SSR—l7fG (Mailing address) (Telephone) Santa Ana ('al;fnrnj„A------ 9-2—�7-0 ( City) State ZiD-Code) tequest:(describe specific nature of approval requested) pegSIGN R6d1row ..iu.in �a-a. ._ _ •�ay-'— _—.. - � �,.yrbyim...ndR Property Description: N.W. ; of S.W. ; of N.E. ; of section 21 T.5, SR6E SBBM. Excepting therefrom westerly 44' northerly 55' and Nag of S.E. ; of N.E. ; of the N.E. ; of said section. lssessors Parcel No. iloae;—OW-00/3C70,2,003y Existing Zoning oo 61 OOG, 00710121013,4164k 014 OZS-1O0—O01 y 00,21 0a 005 _ Existing Gen. Ran Designation Regular med. density 5-7 d.u./acre w/ Property Owner Authorization: The undersigned states that they are the owner(s) of the property described herein and hereby give authorization for the filing of this application. 40, Signatu a Date' Agreement Absolving the City of Palm Desert of all liabiliti relai' o to any Deed Restrictions. ' I DO BY MY SIGNATURE ON THIS AGRE f , absolve the City of Palm Desert of all liabilities regarding any dead �estrictions thcT may be applicable to the property described herein. Sig ture Date Applicants Signature .7RN. 'aIt19177 Suinmt rn Date (for staff use only) ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS Accepted by� ❑ MINISTERIAL ACT E.A. No. ❑ CATEGORINEGATIVE CLA EXEMPTION I❑ NEGATIVE DECLARATION CASE S E f� I o. L OTHER l!/-'1J �V NOTE: APPLICANT MUST ALSO COMPLETE RELATED SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION. Reference Case No. __ CITY OF PALM DESERT SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION FORM DESIGN REVIEW BOARD PROCESS Design Review of: Planned TYPE OF �PRO ECT STAFF USE ONLY: CASE NO. DATE ACTOR (Staff, D.R.B., P.C., or C.C.S ACTION APPLICANT NOTIFIED The Design Review Board process is the method by which the City of Palm Desert reviews detailed design and construction plans prior to the issuance of a building permit. FENCES,POOLS e DEPARTMENT DESIGN PLANtdfF:G OF ENVIRON- REVIEW (—� C0 9fYtISSiON MENTAL BOARD l�� (APPROVES OR SERVICES (ADVISORY) DENIES PROJECT) STAFF INTERIOR REMODELS, MINOR ELECTRICAL, MECHANICAL, OR PLUMBING PERMITS DEPARTMENT BUILDING AND CONSTRUCT SAFETY ION Department of Environmental Services Form 1: Approved by Planning Commission on Rage Two City of Palm Desert Supplemental Application Form DESIGN REVIEW BOARD PROCESS SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES and similar projects require 2-4 working days before they may be submitted to the Building and Safety Division for plan check. MULTI -FAMILY, COMMERCIAL, and other projects that must be reviewed by the D.R.B. and Planning Commission usually require 10-20 days. In order to facilitate processing, the applicant or a designated representative should attend the review hearings to answer questions which may arise regarding the project. MANDATORY FINDINGS: No project may be approved unless: - The proposed development conforms to any legally adopted development standards. - The design and location of the proposed development and its relationship to neighboring, existing or proposed developments and traffic is such that it will not impai'v the desirability of investment or occupation in the neighbor- hood; and that it will not unreasonably interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring, existing or proposed developments, and that it will not create traffic hazards or congestion. - The design and location of the proposed development is in keeping with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and is not detrimental to the har- monious, orderly, and attractive development contemplated by the Zoning Or- dinance and the adopted General Plan of the City. - The. design and location of the proposed development would provide a desirable environment for its occupants, as well as for its neighbors and that it is aesthetically of good composition, materials, textures and colors. - The proposed use conforms to all the requirements of the zone in which it is located and all other applicable requirements. The overall development of the land shall be designed to ensure the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: Each project will be reviewed on the basis of its conformance to the following adopted development standards. In those areas determined by the D.R.B. to be "unacceptable", it is the responsibility of the applicant to redesign that por- tion of the project. I. TERRAIN CONTROL STANDARDS UNACCEPTABLE A. Terrain and soils shall be structurally stable and suitable for development. Page Three City of Palm Desert Supplemental Appli.catio ?rm DESIGN REVIEW BOARD PROCESS I. TERRAIN CONTROL STANDARDS (continued) B. (Water Erosion) Property to be developed shall be protected against drainage runoff from adjacent properties. C. (Water Erosion) Drainage runoff produced by property and development therein shall be contained on the property or allowed to drain onto adjacent public streets or allowed to drain by other City approved means. D. (Wind Erosion) Property to be developed shall be protected against wind carried deposits from adjacent areas. E. (Wind Erosion) Property to be developed shall,.upon com- pletion, produce no appreciable wind carried deposits on adjacent properties. Suitable soil stabilization shall be provided. F. Curb and gutters shall be provided where required to control and regulate drainage. II. ACCESS & CIRCULATION STANDARDS A. Safe & convenient vehicle access to property and development therein shall be provided. B. Safe and convenient pedestrian access to, property and development therein shall be provided. C. Circulation plans (auto, bicycle, and pedestrian) shall conform to municipally developed circulation plans for the vicinity and immediate area. III. SITE PLANNING STANDARDS A. Site Planning shall occur in a manner which minimizes obstruc- tion of scenic views from adjacent properties. B. Site Planning shall be compatible with existing terrain. C. Site Planning shall occur in a manner which does not expose unattractive areas or activities to the detriment of adjacent properties. D. Site Planning shall occur in a manner in which asphalt or concrete is minimized. E. Avoid unnecessary impediments for handicapped persons. UNACCEPTABLE Page Four City of Palm Desert Supplemental Applicatio )rm DESIGN REVIEW BOARD PROCESS UNACCEPTABLE IV. UTILITY & EQUIPMENT STANDARDS A. All service utility lines shall be placed underground. B. All control panels, vaults and necessary equipment shall be architecturally screened or landscaped or other- wise concealed from public view. C. All air conditioning and ventilation equipment shall be located and screened in a manner to prevent exposure to public rights -of -way and adjacent properties. V. VEHICLE PARKING STANDARDS A. Off-street parking should be located in proximity to facilities) it serves. B, Parking areas should be screened from view wherever possible by means of berms, garden walls and landscaping. C. Parking areas shall be shaded where practical. D. Carports for apartment developments shall not front onto a public right-of-way. E, Garages should be encouraged not to front onto a public right-of-way. F. All parking areas for recreational and accessory vehicles and trailers shall be architecturally screened or landscaped or otherwise concealed from public view. G. Adequate handicapped parking spaces shall be provided. VI. ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS A. A singular architectural theme shall be applied to a given structure or complex. (including facade architecture). B. Architectural design shall be applied to entire structure or complex rather than just to those sides exposed to public view. C. Architectural design shall be appropriate to the climatic conditions of the desert area and shall be done in a manner which minimizes the consumption of energy required for heating and cooling. D. Entrances shall include appropriate lighting and identification. E. Architectural design shall employ materials and colors which are compatible and complementary to the desert area. Page Five City of Palm Desert Supplemental Applicatio )rm DESIGN REVIEW BOARD PROCESS VI. ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS (continued) F. Architectural design shall incorporate provisions for signage (if applicable) as an integrated part of the overall design. G. Architecture and landscaping shall be co-ordinated and com- plementary. H, All air conditioning, exhaust, and ventilation, accessory mechanical and electrical equipment and control panels shall be located and screened in a manner to prevent exposure to public rights -of -way and adjacent properties. VII. LANDSCAPING STANDARDS A, Landscaping shall be an integral part of the site planning and architectural design on all projects. B. Provisions for the adequate maintenance and irrigation of landscaping shall be made through the use of underground irri•,.tion systems. C. Landscaping, walls and fences shall not create unsafe conditions along public rights -of -way, VIII. LIGHTING, IDENTIFICATION & SIGNAGE STANDARDS A. Signage shall be architecturally integrated with the structure involved. B. Signage shall be of colors compatible and complementary to the structure it relates to and to other dev ­pment in its surroundings. C. No lighting of signage shall exceed an output of 10 candle- power at 10 feet, D, Signage for commercial uses shall be for identification pur- poses only, IX. FENCING, SCREENING & ENCLOSURE STANDARDS A. Materials and colors of fences and walls shall be compatible and complementary to the structures with which they relate. B. Fences, walls, and enclosures shall be handled as an integrated part of the architecture and landscaping. C. Outside service and storage areas, where permitted, shall be enclosed and screened. UNACCEPTABLE Page Six City of Palm Desert Supplemental Application Form DESIGN REVIEW BOARD PROCESS UNACCEPTABLE IX. FENCING, SCREENING & ENCLOSURE STANDARDS (continued) D. Fences and walls shall not obstruct line -of -sight along public rights -of -way. X. SERVICE AREA STANDARDS A. Service areas shall be designed and constructed of materials and colors which are compatible and complementary to the structures of complexes they serve. B. Service areas shall be located in a manner which does not adversely affect adjacent properties. C. Service areas shall be screened and/or enclosed to prevent their exposure to public rights -of -way and adjacent pro- perties. Page Seven City of Palm Desert Supplemental Application Form DESIGN REVIEW BOARD PROCESS DESIGN REVIEW BOARD PROCESS SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS An "APPLICATION PACKAGE" shall contain: - The completed Application Form. - The appropriate fee as required by the attached Fee Schedule. - Photographs of the site and adjacent properties, particularly adjacent buildings, (At the request of the Staff) or six [6� complete sets for all others. The "PLANS" shall consist of the following: I. General Information !`ock (to include:) A. Street, block nui:;ber, tract B. County Assessor's parcel number (9 digits) C. Legal description of property D. Owner's name, address, and phone number E. Designer's name, address, and phone number F. Any special information or conditions pertaining to the site or to the plans II, Vicinity Map (no scale) A. Major street names B. Other reference points and landmarks III. Site Analysis & Preliminary Drainage & Grading (to scale) to include:) A. North arrow B. Scale C. General drainage pattern of area to include site and adjacent properties within 100' (use, arrows to show drainage flow to and from site). D. Existing contour lines including property corners E. Proposed locations of structures and drives F. Elevations of pads and finished floors G. Finished grades H. Elevations of existing street centerline I, Retaining walls (where applicable) J. Perimeter walls and fences which affect drainage Page Eight City of Palm Desert Supplemental Application Form DESIGN REVIEW BOARD PROCESS IV V. VI Plot Plan (to scale & sufficient size to include:) A. Scale B. North arrow C. Property lines D. Lot dimensions E. Public rights -of -way with existing and proposed dimensions (include street names) F. Existing or proposed curb lines G. Any and all easements H. All utility line locations (gas, electric, cable, water, and sewer) I. Adjacent property uses (showing approximate location of structures and other pertinent features) J. Major vehicle, bicycle, and pedestrian access points to and from site (use arrows of different widths to show direction and intensity of use) K. Setback areas L. All existing and proposed structures M. Interim vehicle, bicycle, and pedestrian circulation patterns (if applicable) N. Off-street parking (to include spaces, regulatory devices, provisions for accessory vehicle storage where applicable, etc.) 0. Parking areas for bicycles and carts (if applicable) P. Service areas and facilities to include: (1) trash storage areas (2) mail delivery boxes (3) loading areas Q. Perimeter fencing and screening R. Proposed sign locations (if applicable) Information Block (if applicable) to include: A. Acreage and square footage calculations B, Ratio of structures to total land area C, Ratio of parking spaces to building square footage D. Parking requirements provided E, Ratio of landscaping to total land area F. Any specific inforriation of special conditions particularly relevant to the project Elevations of all Sides of all Structures (to scale and with dimensions) rage Nine City of Palm Desert Supplemental Applicatio )rm ' DESIGN REVIEW BOARD PROCESS VII. Elevations of Signs (if applicable) VIII. -Elevations of Fencing, Perimeter Screening and Walled Areas IX. Descri tion of Materials to be Used and Chart Showing Exact Color of Materials to be Used One set of plans shall show elevations accurately colored to depict actual appearance of proposed structures or material board, X. Floor Plans of all structures (to scale) with dimensions XI. Landscape, Irrigation, and Exterior Lightinq_Plan (to include:) A. Landscaping, showing location of all trees, shrubs, plants, and ground cover in those areas subject to public view B. Variety and size of vegetation shall be noted C, Irrigation provisions for maintaining aforementioned landscaping D. Lighting provisions for lighting driveways, entrances, yards, premises, parking areas, etc. E. Perimeter treatment of property (fences, wall, vegetation screens, etc.) F. Street furniture and ornamentation, if applicable, (to include:) 1) rock outercroppings 2) benches 3) fountains and waterscapes plot plan 4) newspaper stands 5) statues 6) etc. CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA TREASURER'S RECEIPT N° 00970 1TE: 77 � AMOUNT: $ 1��,1.z-d-6LO Van 7 RECEIVED :FROM T)BIRQ CAA J fQP LTD IN PAYMENT OF: 7D�02-77. f DISTRIBUTION ACCOUNT AMOUNT RECEIVED BY: U`'— I I TOTAL S 10.70 20Y 10055L1 0 FW i W UW <1 f ( d WJ �Z 7 - 0: L �0 z h Z W U J W 10 1 f i 0� u W Z