Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout83MF DEEP CANYON LTD TR 9144November 17, 1978 City Planning Division City of Palm Desert Palm Desert, Ca. Gentlemen We would like to request City final building inspections on following, model lots for Tuesday November 21, 1978. 44-279 Capri Court 44-329 Capri Court 44-339 Capri Court 44-349 Capri Court 44-359 Capri Court We are also asking that finals for Planning Division be delayed untill Tuesday, November 28th due to delay in irrigation and landscaping completion. I might say that as of this writing 85% of the irrigation is installed and by Tuesday November 21st, that 707 of the landscaping will be installed. I appreciate your approval on the above, as I need Edison meters set for the week -end. Thanking you in advance , I remain Interstate Contj tors Jon Jack Jonea / Vice-Preside'K�, Construction RECEIVED NOV 17 19' ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CITY OF PALM DESERT CITY OF PALM nESERT 6I= ENVIRICNUENTAL SERVICES EXHIBIT I NO. CASE NO. q(- jk,,� W. 6HC&1Gol eme J i rw�jZDYP,� 1.i j . tA";,It A, R <C 4440 c;4d ,rslof /,/, Z , amat 'nor �f Call me e i/ NI raw f o � ��� Minutes Design Review Board March 21, 1978 Page Two 4. Case No. 114MF - SUNRISE COMPANY - Preliminary site, floor and elevations for a 460-unit condominium project to be located on the east side of Mon- terey and south of the Desert Squire Country Club. Applicant not present. On a motion by Jackson; seconded by Williams, the Board approved the pre- liminary site, floor and elevations for the project. Carried 4-0 (Jackson, Williams, Johnson, Urrutia). 5. Case No. 77C - NAEGELE OUTDOOR ADVERTISING - Preliminary site, floor and elevations for a commercial office and studio to be located on the west side of Ill and north of Park View Drive. Applicant present. Following discussion of the project, the Board requested that the plans submitted be modified as follows: a. The driveway entrance on the south side of the project site is to be eliminated. b. Outdoor storage area shall be screened by: recessing; landscaping; and/or use of masonry wall. c. Redesign back of structure to: accommodate additional 10' setback; and, reduce height of studio by 4'. d. Intensify landscaping on north and south sides of project site. e. Temporary ground sign shall be in earth tone color range. On a motion by Jackson, seconded by Urrutia, the Board moved to carry this case over to review the revised drawings. Carried 4-0 (Jackson, Urrutia, Johnson Jams). 6. Case No. 83MF - D P CANYON LTD. - Final landscaping for a 212-single family resideyAal complex to be located at the southeast corner of Deep anyon th Avenue. Applicant not present. On a motion by Urrutia, seconded by Williams, the Board approved the final landscaping plans with noted revisions as discussed with the applicant. Carried 4-0 (Urrutia, Williams, Jackson, Johnson). 7. Discussion on use of PVC as roofing material. On a motion by Williams, seconded by Urrutia, the Board recommended against the use of PVC as roofing material. It was the Board's concensus that the material was not durable enough to withstand the general climatic conditions in the desert area. Carried 4-0 (Williams, Urrutia, Jackson, Johnson). 8. On a motion by Jackson, seconded by Williams, the meeting was adjourned at 6:45 p.m. Carried 4-0 (Jackson, Williams, Urrutia, Johnson). 112" 14',, RONALD R. KNIPPEL, Assist Planner rk/ks Ll (ZYfLfll�r o:ff :108,_nnm 11DcN)=oro{�, 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (TIQ 346-0611 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION REPORT Date: March 27, 1978 REPORT ON: 212 Single-family residences CASE NO.: 83MF ZONE: PR-5, N LOCATION: Southeast corner of Deep Canyon & 44th Avenue APPLICANT: DEEP CANYON LTD. NATURE OF APPROVAL SOUGHT: Final landscaping DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION: After reviewing the submitted plans and the presentations by the staff and by the applicant, the DRB APPROVED this project, subject to the attached conditions. Date of Action Motion Made By Seconded By: Vote: March 21, 1978 Urrutia Williams 4-0 Reasons for Negative Vote (s): (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision.) STAFF COMMENTS: DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE: Mar. 21. 1978 CASE NO.: 83MF APPLICANT: DEEP CANYON LTD. LOCATION: Southeast corner of 44th and Deep Canyon ZONING: PR-5. N STAFF RECOM6IENDATION: The final landscaping plans have been reviewed by the Staff and Mr. Johnson. A number of changes with regard to plant varieties have been suggested to the applicant and the appli- cant has agreed to make the changes. The plans are very com- prehensive. Staff is recommending approval of the final landscaping plans. Case No. 83 MF Aug. 9, 1977 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO. 83 MF 1. The development of this project shall conform substantially to all requirements of TT 9144 (Revised) and DP 02-77 (Revised) and to all development plans submitted in behalf of this case (Exhibits A), and as revised according to the Design Review Board process. Any minor changes require approval by the Director of Environmental Services. Any substantial change requires approval by the Planning Commission. 2. All requirements of any law, ordinance, or regulation of the State, City, and any other applicable government entity shall be complied with as part of the development process. 3. This approval is applicable, subject to the development of this project, commencing within one year from approval date and being promptly completed. 4. All service and distribution lines for utilities shall be placed underground. 5. No roof top air conditioning equipment shall be permitted. 6. Elevations are approved as shown. 7. The applicant shall explore the feasibility of using solar energy to heat all swimming pools. 8. Construction plans shall be submitted for approval to the City Fire Marshall prior to issuance of building permits. All conditions shall be made a part of construction and no certificate of occupancy shall be issued until completed. 9. Final landscaping, grading, fencing, lighting, amenities, trash storage, walkway layout, sign and irrigation plans shall be submitted through the Design Review Process. The building permit when issued, shall include the grading, lighting, amenities, trash storage, walkways, swimming pool equipment, irrigation systems, and other details. No final inspec- tion or occupancy permit shall be given by the Dept. of Environmental Services to this project until the aforementioned approved plans and construction shall have been completed 10. Emergency access right-of-way off of Deep Canyon shall have a minimum width of 20 feet. 11. A complete landscaping plan, which includes landscaping in areas adjacent to the unit within the individual lots, shall be provided to the Design Review Board for approval. 12. Porches, patios, and other related amenities shall be added where possible to make the elevations more compatible with the desert environment. AGREEMENT I accept and agree, prior to use of this permit or approval, to comply with all the conditions set forth, and understand thatthe Department of Building and Safety will not issue a building permit or allow occupancy on the use permitted until this signed confirmation has been received by the Department of Environmental Services. Date Applicant's Signature c :ff lFmn3cm 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE August 31, 1977 APPLICANT Deep Canyon Limited Stan Bell 17748 Skypark Boulevard, Ste. 165 Irvine. CA. 92714 CASE NO.: 83 MF The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of August 30, 1977 CONTINUED 1D", 4107 X APPROVED BY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 281 PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF FOR CONCURRENCE WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION. PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF FOR PUBLIC HEARING. Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Environmental Services, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. PAUL A. WILLIAMS, SECRETARY PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSSION n cc: Applicant C.V.C.W.D. File Minutes Palm Desert Planning Commission August 17, 1977 Page Three VIII. NEW BUSINESS (Continued) A. C.V.C.W.D. Booster Station Discussion (Continued) It was suggested that the process of filing an application be studied and try to simplify the process to save staff and applicant time and trouble. It was also suggested that the Commission draft a letter to the various service agencies covering the various problems in the area and ask for the their assistance in solving the problems and possibly the different heads of these agencies could be asked to speak to the Commission in a joint study session with the City Council. Chairman Berkey indicated that a feasibility study be done on new projects and if they are not feasibile to the City and the services it can provide, they should be rejected and the reasons noted so that the public and the developers become aware of the issues. He also suggested that Mr. Weeks of the C.V.C.W.D. be asked to attend the next meeting in September. A motion was made by Commissioner Kelly, seconded by Commissioner Kryder to find that the proposed projects are in conformance with the adopted Palm Desert General Plan and approve Planning Commission Resolution No. 275; carried unanimously (5-0). IX. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ITEMS A. Review of Cases acted on by the Design Review Board at their meeting of August 9, 1977. Mr. Cipriani reviewed the cases: ( Case No. 77MF - PALM DESERT VENTURE, applicant - request for approval Il of fencing plan for Shadow Mountain Resort and Racquet Club. Commissioner Snyder pointed out that the fence is supposed to be wrought -iron mesh, small enough that a golf ball cannot oo through i.t. The Commission rejected the case until the correct fence plan is submitted. Case No. 57C - CLARENCE SABA, applicant - request for approval of preliminary site, floor and elevation plans for a commercial complex. Commissioner Kelly requested that Conditions No. 19 and 20 be deleted. Commissioner Kryder noted that Condition No. 15 creates an economic hardship for the developer. The Commission approved the case with the deletion of Condition No. 19 and 20 and the revision of Condition No.15 to read: "Applicant should investigate various colors and materials to be utilized for paved areas". Case No. 83MF - DEEP CANYON, LTD., applicant - request for approval of pre- liminary site, floor and elevation plans for 212 single family residences. Discussion followed concerning the landscaping and whether the developer or the owner would be responsible, also some question as to the elevations. The Commission requested that the case be continued until the developer could be present to discuss the landscaping issue. Case No. 48MF - AFFILIATED CONSTRUCTION, applicant - request for approval of a landscaping concept for Parkview Subdivision. I Case No. 83 MF Aug. 9, 1977 k CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO. 83 MF 1. The development of this project shall conform substantially to all requirements of TT 9144 (Revised) and DP 02-77 (Revised) and to all development plans submitted in behalf of this case (Exhibits A), and as revised according to the Design Review Board process. Any minor changes require approval by the Director of Environmental Services. Any substantial change requires approval by the Planning Commission. 2. All requirements of any law, ordinance, or regulation of the State, City, and any other applicable government entity shall be complied with as part of the development process. 3. This approval is applicable, subject to the development of this project, commencing within one year from approval date and being promptly completed. 4. All service and distribution lines for utilities shall be placed underground. 5. No roof top air conditioning equipment shall be permitted. 6. Elevations are approved as shown. 7. The applicant shall explore the feasibility of using solar energy to heat all swimming pools. 8. Construction plans shall be submitted for approval to the City Fire Marshall prior to issuance of building permits. All conditions shall be made a part of construction and no certificate of occupancy shall be issued until completed. 9. Final landscaping, grading, fencing, lighting, amenities, trash storage, walkway layout, sign and irrigation plans shall be submitted through the Design Review Process. The building permit when issued, shall include the grading, lighting, amenities, trash storage, walkways, swimming pool equipment, irrigation systems, and other details. No final inspec- tion or occupancy permit shall be given by the Dept. of Environmental Services to this project until the aforementioned approved plans and construction shall have been completed 10. Emergency access right-of-way off of Deep Canyon shall have a minimum width of 20 feet. 11. A complete landscaping plan, which includes landscaping in areas adjacent to the unit within the individual lots, shall be provided to the Design Review Board for approval. 12• Porches, patios, and other related amenities shall be added where possible to make the elevations more compatible with the desert environment. AGREEMENT I accept and agree, prior to use of this permit or approval, to comply with all the conditions set forth, and understand thatthe Department of Building and Safety will not issue a building permit or allow occupancy on the use permitted until this signed confirmation has been received by the Department of Environmental Services. Date Applicant's Signature Case No. 83 MF ' Aug. 9, 1977 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO. 83 MF 1. The development of this project shall conform substantially to all requirements of TT 9144 (Revised) and DP 02-77 (Revised) and to all development plans submitted in behalf of this case (Exhibits A), and as revised according to the Design Review Board process. Any minor changes require approval by the Director of Environmental Services. Any substantial change requires approval by the Planning Commission. 2. All requirements of any law, ordinance, or regulation of the State, City, and any other applicable government entity shall be complied with as part of the development process. 3. This approval is applicable, subject to the development of this project, commencing within one year from approval date and being promptly completed. 4. All service and distribution lines for utilities shall be placed underground. 5. No roof top air conditioning equipment shall be permitted. 6. Elevations are approved as shown. 7. The applicant shall explore the feasibility of using solar energy to heat all swimming pools. B. Construction plans shall be submitted for approval to the City Fire Marshall prior to issuance of building permits. All conditions shall be made a part of construction and no certificate of occupancy shall be issued until completed. 9. Final landscaping, grading, fencing, lighting, amenities, trash storage, walkway layout, sign and irrigation plans shall be submitted through the Design Review Process. The building permit when issued, shall include the grading, lighting, amenities, trash storage, walkways, swimming pool equipment, irrigation systems, and other details. No final inspec- tion or occupancy permit shall be given by the Dept. of Environmental Services to this project until the aforementioned approved plans and construction shall have been completed 10. Emergency access right-of-way off of Deep Canyon shall have a minimum width of 20 feet. 11. A complete landscaping plan, which includes landscaping in areas adjacent to the unit within the individual lots, shall be provided to the Design Review Board for approval. 12. Porches, patios, and other related amenities shall be added where possible to make the elevations more compatible with the desert environment. AGREEMENT I accept and agree, prior to use of this permit or approval, to comply with all the conditions set forth, and understand thatthe Department of Building and Safety will not issue a building permit or allow occupancy on the use permitted until this signed confirmation has been received by the Department of Environmental Services. Date Applicant's Signature Minutes Palm Desert Planning Commission October 4, 1977 Page Seven IX. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ITEMS A. Review of cases acted on by the Design Review Board at their meeting of September 20, 1977. Mr. Williams reviewed cases 111SA, 83MF, 87MF, 59C, noting that a late response was received from ity of Indian Wells in reference to Case 83MF recommending a channel down eastside of the tract. Chairman Berkey asked if the applicant would be required to join an assessment district. Mr. Cook noted that it was not within the Cook Street alignment. Mr. Williams noted that he mentioned the response received from City of Indian Wells just for the record and that the Conditions of Ap- proval covered the assessment district question. Mr. Freed reviewed Case No. 68MF pointing out the treatment along San Luis Rey including the berming and elevations. Com- missioner Reading questioned the visibility for vehicles on the road. Commissioner Snyder noted the plans were not ac- curate with regard to the road and its location. Some discussion followed regarding the roads, drainage channel, landscaping on streets as pointed out by Commissioner Reading. Case No. 59C was discussed further and Chairman Berkey asked if the applicant would tell the Commission of some of the features of his project. CHARLES MARTIN, 73-612 Highway 111, told the Commission of the sprawl type development he was proposing and noted that most of the area was covered with parking. He also noted the advantages of the solar energy concept he had proposed. The Commission commended Mr. Martin for his solar energy con- cept and the underground parking, both needed in our community. Com- missioner Kryder noted the ultra modern outside archectural treatment was not compatible to the surroundings. The Commissioners agreed that they appreciated the idea but hoped the applicant would bring in another concept for the outside architectural treatment. The Commission Af approved the following cases 111SA, 83MF, 87MF, 68MF by Planning Commis - on Resolution No. 289; motion by Commissioner Snyder, seconded by Com- � ssioner Reading, carried unanimously (5-0). Case No. 59C was con- inued to a the October 19th meeting; motion by.Commissioner Kelly, J3econded by Commissioner Kryder, carried unanimously (5-0). Mr. Williams asked that the Commissioners advise the secretary of the dates they could attend a Design Review Board meeting as planned at the joint meeting with the DRB. Each Commissioner took a date cover- ing meetings through December 6, 1977. X. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Discussion regarding a possible amendment to the By-laws of the Planning Commission relative to the Secretary's powers to present last minute items to the Commission. Mr. Williams noted that the Planning Commission is supposed to be notified of any items referred back from City Council at their next meeting. He then asked if there was any discussion at this time. The Commission agreed that there was no need for a change in the By-laws. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 289 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, ANNOUNCING FINDINGS AND APPROVING THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTIONS OF SEPTEMBER 20, 1977. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did review the Design Review Board actions of September 20, 1977,-approving: Case No. 111SA - Request for approval of a sign for a restaurant for CARL COX; Case No. 834AF -,Request for approval of final construction drawings for 212 single family residences for DEEP CANYON, LTD; Case No. 87MF - Request for approval of preliminary site, floor and elevation plans for a duplex for ROBERT RICCIARDI; Case No. 59C - Request for approval of preliminary site, floor and elevation plans for an office building for CHARLES MARTIN; Case No. 68MF - Request for approval of final construction drawings for 15 condominium units for PALM DESERT VENTURE, LTD; WHEREAS, at this time, upon considering and receiving all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said Commission did find sufficient facts and reasons to exist to approve the Design Review Board actions of September 20, 1977. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the Commission in this case. 2. That it does hereby approve the Design Review Board actions of September 20, 1977, except for Case.No. 59C which was continued. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 4th day of October, 1977, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: BERKEY, KELLY, KRYDER, SNYDER, READING NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE GEORGE BERKEY, Chairman ATTEST: PAUL A. WILLIAMS, Secretary /ks MINUTES PALM DESERT DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING SEPTEMBER 20, 1977 1. After a one hour study session, the regular meeting of the Palm Desert Design Review Board was called to order by Chairman Johnson at 5:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Palm Desert City Hall. Members present: Eric Johnson George Minturn Bill Hobbs Frank Urrutia Paul A. Williams Jim Hill Members absent: Bernard Leung Staff present: Ralph Cipriani - Associate Planner Clyde Beebe - Assistant City Engineer Sam Freed - Assistant Planner 2. MINUTES A. Minutes of the meeting of September 6, 1977. It was moved by Minturn and seconded by Urrutia that the minutes be approved as submitted. Motion carried 4-0 (Johnson, Minturn, Hobbs, Urrutia). Mr. Williams advised the ORB members that the applicant for Case No. 58C, Mr. Gibbs, was unable to complete the revision of the required plans and was therefore requesting a continuance. It was moved by Hobbs and seconded by Minturn to continue the case to the meeting of October 11, 1977. Motion car- ried 4-0 (Johnson, Minturn, Hobbs, Urrutia). 3. Case No. 83MF - DEEP CANYON, LTD. - Review of final construction drawings for 212 condominium units on a 48-acre project located south of 44th Avenue and east of Deep Canyon Road. (PR-5, N). Stan Bell, project architect, present. In response to the issue of having a carport for each unit because of the short driveways, Mr. Bell indicated that all units would have garages equip- ped with automatic door openers. Mr. Bell then pointed out those units with enlarged patios, trellises, and porches, which were required by the DRB. He also said that 10 landscape plans would be submitted in the near future for DRB review. Urrutia said the building plans appeared satisfactory and moved that they be approved. Hobbs seconded and the motion was approved 4-0 (John- son, Minturn, Hobbs, Urrutia). 4. Case No. 111SA - CARL COX - Review of sign plans for a ground monument sign for a new restaurant, The Fort, located south of E1 Paseo and easterly of Lantana. Several members pointed out that the sign, which was greatly improved over the original submittal, would look even better without a cross beam on top and that the address was unnecessary. Johnson thought that the word "entrance" would be more appropriate than the address. It was moved by Hobbs and seconded by Minturn to approve the sign as submitted, subject to four conditions and to suggest that the applicant discuss the matter of the cross beam and the address with the staff. Motion carried 4-0 (Urrutia, Minturn, Hobbs, Johnson). 5. Case No. 87MF - R. RICCIARDI - Review of preliminary plans for a duplex at the ` northeast corner of San Luis Rey and Alessandro Drive. The applicant, Mr. Robert Ricciardi present. The DRB discussed the question of access to the pool from both units. Mr. Ricciardi indicated that there was no other way to locate the pool to improve access from the corner unit. Minturn felt that this was not necessarily bad since some people would not want the pool noise. Mr. Williams pointed out that Standard Condition No. 5 on curb and gutter should be deleted since it was already installed. It was moved by Hobbs and seconded by Minturn to ap- prove the project subject to 6 conditions, with the deletion of No. 5. Motion carried 4-0 (Minturn, Hobbs, Johnson, Urrutia). Planning Commission Resolution No. 2,K CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO. DP 02-77 (REVISE STANDARD CONDITIONS: July 5, 1977 The development of the property shall conform substantially with that as shown on plot plan marked Exhibit 'A' on file with the Department of Environmental Services, Case No. DP 02-77(Revised), unless otherwise amended by the following conditions. 2. Prior to issuance of a building permit, for any condominium structure, a subdivision shall be recorded conforming substan- tially with said Exhibit 'A'. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contemplated by this approval, the applicant shall first obtain permits and/or clearance from the following public agencies: County Department of Public Health Palm Desert Design Review Board Process Coachella Valley County Water District Regional Water Quality Control Board #7 Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to the Department of Building and Safety at the time of the issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated here- with. 4. A landscaping, grading, lighting, amenities, trash storage, walkway layout, and irrigation plan shall be submitted through the Design Review Board process. The building permit when issued shall include the grading, lighting, amenities, trash storage, walkways, swimming pool equipment, and irrigation systems. No final inspection or oc- cupancy shall be given by the Department of Environmental Services to this project until the aforementioned approved plans and construc- tion shall have been completed. 5. The applicant shall conform to all requirements and improvements deemed necessary by the City Fire Marshall as stated in the attached letter. 6. Construction of the development permitted hereby may be done pro- gressively in stages, provided adequate vehicular access is constructed for all.dwelling units and further provided that such stage development conforms substantially with the intent and purposes of this approval for the provision of open areas, recreation facilities, and off-street auto- mobile parking. 7. The sewerage disposal system shall be submitted to and approved by the Coachella Valley County Water District prior to issuance of a building permit. 8. This approval shall be used within one (1) year of this action, other- wise it shall become null and void and of no effect whatsoever. By "use" is meant recordation of a subdivision map and beginning of con- struction of a portion of the project. 9. Prior to utilization of this Development Plan, the applicant shall agree in writing to any conditions of approval. Planning Commission Resolution No. 256 July 5, 1977 Conditions of Approval Case No. DP 02-77(Revised) Page Two I. STANDARD CONDITIONS (continued) 10. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein which are in addition to all requirements, limitations, and restrictions of all municipal ordi- nances and State and Federal statutes now in force, or which hereafter may be in force. II. SPECIAL CONDITIONS: 1. The applicant shall underground all existing overhead utility distri- bution lines on or immediately adjacent to the property. 2. (a) A meandering masonry or stucco wall, six (6) feet high, shall be installed along the full frontage of 44th Avenue and Deep Canyon Road except for approved openings of design and materials as ap- proved through the Design Review Board process. (b) A six (6) foot high masonry or stucco wall shall be installed non -street property line of the project. Said wall shall be the same as approved for the street frontages. 3. The indicated date palms shall be installed as shown on Exhibit A and maintenance shall be the responsibility of the developer which may ultimately be assumed by the homeowners association for the project. 4. The maximum phasing shall be limited to four (4) phases. 5. The proposed landscaping and walkway treatment of the public right-of- way on Deep Canyon Road and 44th Avenue shall be modified as necessary to conformance of the improvement requirements of Tract 9144(Revised). 6. Any proposed landscaping of the lots across the street from the pro- posed openings to 44th Avenue and Deep Canyon Road shall include the utilization of existing date palms and/or citrus trees as determined by the Director of Environmental Services. 7. A minimum of 45 guest parking spaces shall be provided in bays along the private streets at locations which would supplement the parking needs for the proposed cul-de-sac areas and the major recreation areas. The precise location and design shall be reviewed as a part of the Design Review Board process. 8. Any wall or fencing on the proposed lots shall be limited to a three to three and one-half (3-32) foot high masonry or stucco wall with approved openings on the rear property lines. $aid limitation shall not affect any Ordinance requirements relating to any private.pools. 9. An emergency access of a design acceptable to the City Fire Marshall shall be constructed from Deep Canyon Road, along the southerly boundary of the project and through proposed lot 123 (Tract 9144-Revised) to the proposed private streets. To accomplish this requirement, the proposed lot number 123 and unit is hereby deleted and any width not needed for the required emergency access shall be dispersed among the adjacent lots. 1.0. The proposed landscape treatment in the center of the proposed cul-de- sacs shall not be permitted unless a 40 foot turning radius can be main- tained as approved by the City Fire Marshall. Planning Commission Resolution No. 256 Conditions of Approval Case No. DP 02-77(Revised) Page Three II. SPECIAL CONDITIONS (continued) July 5, 1977 11. The design of any dwelling unit, located on a cul-de-sac and not having a minimum of sixteen (16) feet street setback, shall be modified to provide for one carport and one garage parking space or electric garage doors to be provided through the Design Review Board Process. 12. The proposed tennis courts shall be recessed from adjacent walkway or private lot grade a minimum of three (3) feet as approved through the Design Review Board process. 13. All swimming pools shall be enclosed by walls or fences, a minimum of four (4) feet in height. 14. The applicant shall explore the possibility of heating the swimming pools with solar heating units. 15. A small maintenance building shall be constructed for maintenance equipment storage. 16. A master trash agreement shall be developed for the total project and enclosed trash storage areas shall be provided through the development as a part of the Design Review Board process. 17. Date trees affected by the bay parking shall be relocated elsewhere in the development. AGREEMENT I accept and agree, prior to use of this. permit or approval, to comply with all the conditions set forth, and understand the Department of Building and Safety will not issue a building permit or allow occupancy on the use per- mitted until this signed confirmation has been received by the Department of Environmental Services. Date Applicant's Signature 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (7I4) 346-0611 REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE Oct. 5, 1977 APPLICANT DEEP CANYON LTD. Kiyotoki/Bell Assoc. Stan Bell 17748 Skypark Blvd. Ste. 165 Irvine. Ca. 92714 CASE NO.: 83MF - Final construction plans (except landscaping) The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of Oct. 4. 1977 CONTINUED TO DENIED XX APPROVED BY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 289 PLACED ON THE AGE14DA OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF FOR CONCURRENCE WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION. PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF FOR PUBLIC HEARING. Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Environmental Services, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. PAUL A. WILLIAMS, SECRETARY PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSSION cc: Applicant C.V.C.W.D. File (2:5fajj OO i TFIE 2 L 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION REPORT Date: Sept. 21, 1977 REPORT ON: 212-Single-family residences CASE NO.: 83MF ZONE: PR-5, N LOCATION: South of 44th Avenue, east of Deep Canyon Rd. APPLICANT: DEEP CANYON, LTD. NATURE OF APPROVAL SOUGHT: Final construction drawin DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION: After reviewing the submitted plans and the presentations by the staff and by the applicant, the DRB APPROVED this project, subject to the attached con itions. Date of Action: Motion Made By: Seconded By: Vote: Sept. 20, 1977 Urrutia Hobbs Reasons for Ne ative An appeal o the aboVote (s): ve action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision.) STAFF CO1,1MENTS: Placed on the Planning Commission Agenda for the meeting of October 4, 1977. Minutes Palm Desert Planning Commission August 30, 1977 Page Seven IX. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ITEMS (Continued) C. Cases from the Design Review Board meetings of August 9, 1977 and August 23, 1977. Mr. Cipriani presented the es to the Ian 'ng Commission. He explained that on the Hidden Palms proje Case NO. 83 t e Design Review Board wanted land- scaping in the private ya s and asked for mo ified elevations to include more trellises and patios. STAN BELL, Irvine, the project architect spoke to the Commission. He in- dicated that 8-10 landscape plans for each private yard were being prepared. Each owner would select the plan they favored. If not installed within 90 days, the homeowners association would do the work and would assess the owner. He was reluctant to revise the elevations, but agreed to add more covered porches. The staff replied that this would be acceptible and that it was not the City's intent to cover all sides with overhangs. Mr. Williams suggested that Condition No. 12 be revised to read: "Porches, patios, and other related amenities shall be added where possible to make the elevations more compatible with the desert environment." The revised condition was inserted in Subsection 2 of the Design Review Board Resolution. It was moved by Commissioner Snyder and seconded by Commissioner Kelly to adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 281 as amended approving the Design Review Board cases of August 9, 1977, and August 23, 1977. Motion carried unanimously (5-0). X. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Agenda items for joint City Council -Planning Commission meeting of September 7, 1977. Commissioner Snyder suggested that the topic of communications be added so that the Council receives a better understanding of the Commission's justification for taking a certain action on a project and so that the Commission becomes more familiar with the Council's philosophy on development. Commissioner Reading wanted to discuss the proposal to have developers obtain clearance from other agencies before submitting for City approval. Chairman Berkey wanted to see some thought given to requiring an economic impact report for each project similar to the Fresno method. Commissioner Kryder wanted to talk to the Council about the issue of concrete driveways and the City's relationship with C-VAG. XI. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS - None XII. COMMENTS A. City Staff - The Commission will be having a joint study session in October with the Design Review Board. B. City Attorney - No Comment C. Planning Commissioners - No Comment 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE August 18, 1977 APPLICANT DEEP CANYON, LTD. 2101 E. Fourth St. Suite 210 Santa Ana, Ca. 92705 CASE NO.: 83MF The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of August 17, 1977 XX CONTINUED TO August 30, 1977 DENIED APPROVED BY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF FOR CONCURRENCE WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION, PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF FOR PUBLIC HEARING. Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Environmental Services, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. PAUL A. WILLIAMS, SECRETARY ` PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSSION cc: Applicant C,V.C,W.D. File J 0 nfl�--�nm 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 34G-OSII DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION REPORT Date: Aug. 10, 1977 REPORT ON: 212 Single Family Residences CASE NO.: 83 MF ZONE: PR-5, N LOCATION: South of 44th Ave East of Deep Canyon Rd APPLICANT: Deep Canyon LTD NATURE OF APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary Site, Floor & Elevations DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION: After reviewing the submitted plans and the presentations by the staff and by the applicant, the DRB APPROVED this project, subject to the attached conditions. Date of Action: 819177 Motion ?lade By: Johnson Seconded By: Hill Vote: 3-0 (Urrutia abstained) Reasons for Negative Vote (s): T1n appeal o the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision.) STAFF CO,%1MENTS : i Kiyotoki/Bell & Associates Architects and Land Planners Telephone: 17748Skypark Blvd. Suite 165 Irvine, California 92714 (714)751-8185 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL DATE August 1, 1977 JOB NO. Planning Department To: City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickley Pear Lane Palm Desert, CA 92260 Attention: Ralph Cipriani Subject: Transmitted: Hidden Palms Design Review Plans Elevations Sections Presentation Panels Comments (X) Herewith ( ) Photographs ( ) Brochures (X) Site Plans ( ) Originals 0 ( ) Under separate Cover Grading Plans Sketches Other 3 copies revised site plan per your request! If material received is not exactly as stated above, please notify us immediately. Very truly yours, KIYOTOKI/BELL & ASSOCIATES by Stan Bell, AIA (X) First Class Mail ( ) Air Mail ( ) Special Delivery ( ) Air Freight ( ) Deliver ( ) Picked up MEMORANDUM To: Planning Commission From: Design Review Board Applicant: Hidden Palms, Ltd. Case No.: 83MF Date: July 26, 1977 1. Needs more overhang; units look "boxy". 2. Cornice element doesn't work well; looks antiquated. 3. Design not compatible to desert architecture (e.g. - large amount of window exposure.) .2G'Lvl{�G� �oZL•Y .e�G(�'IZ.�Gt'r.'r_� l��.L�L cC� MEMORANDUM To: Planning Commission From: Design Review Board Applicant: Hidden Palms, Ltd. Case No.: 83MF Date: July 26, 1977 1. Needs more overhang; units look "boxy" 2. Cornice element doesn't work well; looks antiquated. 3. Design not compatible to desert architecture (e.g. - large amount of window exposure.) CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA TREASURER'S RECEIPT N° 539 Received of:Q,1J G Od Ali For 0K2 /V, q/V`f V Received : CITY TREASURER FA Account No. I Amount I Total WA Y Q m m CITY i PALM DESERT 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE PALM DESERT CA.6226O (714)546-O611 ����CSl3Cti7l��! 4 4 �Ot.S DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION ATTN: RALPH CIPRIANI APR. NO. DATE REC. (DO A10r WR/r£ /N THIS SPACE) APPLICANT (Please print) DEEP CANYON LTD. (NAIt1 E) 2101 E. Fourth Street, Suite 210 714-558-3766 (Moiling address) (Telephone) Santa Ana, Calif. 92705 _ (City) State (Zip-Codo) Request:(describe specific nature of approval requested) Design Review Tract 9144 Property Description: Tract 9144 Assessors Parcel No. Existing Zoning PR5 ( N Overlay ) Existing Gen, Pion Designation Property Owner Authorization: The undersignAd states that they are the owner(s) of the property described heroin and hereby give authorization for the filing of this application. �n DEEP CANYON LTD., a limited Partnership BY v \YNTERSTATE PROPERTIES. INC.. General Partner By. E Absolving the City of Palm Desert of all lia I DO BY MY SIGNATURE ON THIS A, Signature an.n. jonnson_Pres any Deed Rosyrictions. Diva opt�(heeg }C}1i,ty ,,,of��,aPallm �Dpees�e�rt of DE�P�AFYON AD'U PSi�erm' yFable INTERSTATE PROPERTIES, .General Patine, Ry: (for staff use only) ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS �[ ❑ MINISTERIAL ACT E. A. No. \ _❑ CATEGORICA EXEMPTION U NEGATIVE DECLARATION ❑ OTHER Pa2ner bilities regarding any deed property described herein. CASE No. S3 M� NOTE: APPLICANT MUST ALSO COMPLETE RELATED SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION. Reference Case