Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout85MF DEEP CANYON TENNIS CLUB JM PETERS CO INC TRACT 4568DATE ADORE CALLED BY CITY OF PALM DESERT BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPT. PERMIT NO. Q POOL Grading _ Temp Pole Trench , U. Grd. Elec. MOBILE HOME Steel ___--_ Bond Post Holes ---- Rough Elec Q FENCE/WALL Bond Beam —____. Fihol lec Grout ----- SPECIAL Roof Nail MOBILE Oh _ Frame —_ Site Pre Insulation Install ti 33 - y33�`� ST' iIGNED TO _ otxalallff �tve I A-Rgh Wo t PI �_--_ r Hook Up Off — BUSI Q S LICC Plaster _ Awning PLANNING \ Drywall Porch O� oth r„K1gIt Final Fin _ SIGN�}-- Q OTHER ��J/ ;T/— INSTRUCTIONS — MON. TUE. WED. THU. FRI. 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (T14) 346-0611 January 11, 1978 J. M. Peters Co., Inc. 1601 Dove St. Ste 190 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Attn: Gregory Erickson, Secretary Re: 85MF Dear Mr. Erickson: The landscaping plans for Deep Canyon Tennis Club have been approved by the Staff and are ready for pickup, to be delivered to the Dept. of Building and Safety. We suggest you use a drip irrigation system around the buildings, wherever possible. We have made some minor changes in plants called out on the drawings, which we will review with you when you pickup the approved plans. Yours �..very truly, Paul A. Williams, Director Dept. of Environmental Services lm/pw/ks PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0. M A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, ANNOUNCING FINDINGS AND APPROV- ING THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTIONS OF SEPTEMBER 6, 1977. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did review iew Board actions of September 6, 1977, approving: Case No. 85MF - Request for approval of final construction drawings for a condominium project (68 units) for J. M. PETERS CO., INC., Case No. 71MF - Request for approval of final construction drawings for a 50 unit condominium project for PRELUDE DEVELOP- MENT CO.; Case No. 86MF - Request for approval of final construction drawings for 26 condominium units for MARRAKESH BUILDING AND COUNTRY CLUB CORPORATION; Case No. 8MF - Request for approval of carports and trash enclosures for HUGH THORSON; WHEREAS, at this time, upon considering and receiving all testimony and argu- ments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said Commission did find sufficient facts and reasons to exist to approve the Design Review Board actions of September 6, 1977. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: I. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the Commission in this case, except that the landscaping Plan submitted for Case No. 71MF is not approved as a final landscap- ing plan. 2. That it does hereby approve the Design Review Board actions of Septem- ber 6, 1977. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 14th day of September, 1977, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: BERKEY, SNYDER, KRYDER, KELLY, READING NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE GEORGE BERKEY, Chairman ATTEST: PAUL A. WILLIAMS, Secretary As Minutes Palm Desert Planning Commission September 14, 1977 Page Three VIII. NEW BUSINESS (Cont.) A motion to find the proposed projects in conformance with the adopted Palm Desert General Plan by Planning Commission Resolution No. 282, was made by Commissioner Snyder, seconded by Commissioner Kelly; carried unanimously (5-0). IX. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ITE31S A. Review of Cases acted on by the Design Review Board on September 6, 1977. Mr. Cipriani reviewed noting they all complied with Case No 85MF, 71MF, 86MF, and 8MF the con iti and City standards. There was some discussion regarding the length of County approval effectiveness. A motion was made by Commissioner Kryder to approve the Design Review Board actions by Planning Commission Resolution No. 283, seconded by Commissioner Kelly; carried unanimously (5-0). X. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Consideration of a Joint Meeting of the Planning Commission and Design Review Board on September 29, 1977 at 7:00 p.m. The Commission approved the date and directed the staff to notify the Design Review Board. B. Consideration of a one-year extension of period of approval of Final Construction Drawings to allow construction of 52-units at Deep Canyon Tennis Club. Case No. 41MF. A motion was made by Commissioner Reading to approve a one-year extension of time on the Final Construction Drawings for Case No. 41MF by Planning Commission Resolution No. 284, seconded by Commissioner Kelly; carried unanimously (5-0). - C. Special item added to agenda at this time, review of Case No. C/Z 07-76. Chairman Berkey noted a conflict of interest and left the room at this time. Vice -Chairman Reading noted that he thought the Commission needed more time to review this case and last minute items were not appreciated by the Commission. Mr. Roland Sweet spoke to the Commission stating that the President of the proposed clinic had asked him to inform the Commission that they were withdrawing their request to develop the clinic in Palm Desert. He noted that the City Council was not aware of this at the time they reviewed the case and he felt this fact may have altered their decision on the density issue. Commissioner Kelly moved and Commissioner Snyder seconded, that the Case be continued to the October 4th meeting; carried (4-0) Berkey abstained. 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE Sept. 15, 1977 APPLICANT J. M. PETERS CO., INC. 1601 Dove St. Ste. 190 Newport Beach, Ca. 92660 CASE NO.: 85MF The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of . 14, 1977 CONTINUED TO DENIED XXX APPROVED BY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 283 PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF FOR CONCURRENCE WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION. PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF FOR PUBLIC HEARING. Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Environmental Services, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. PAUL A. WILLIAMS, SECRETARY PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSSION cc: Applicant C.V.C.W.D. File .PETERS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO. 85MF SEPT. 6, 1977 1. The development of this project shall conform substantially to all develop- ment plans submitted in behalf of this case (Exhibits A-GG), and as revised according to the Design Review Board process. Any minor change requires ap- proval by the Director of Environmental Services. Any substantial change requires approval by the Design Review Board. 2. All requirements of any law, ordinance, or regulation of the State, City, and any other applicable government entity shall be complied with as part of the development process. 3. This approval is applicable, subject to the development of this project, com- mencing within one year from approval date and being promptly completed. 4. Prior to issuance of any building permits, an engineered drainage plan for the project under application shall be submitted to the Dept. of Public Works and shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to final in- spection of the units for this phase. 5. The applicant shall submit a revited'landscaping plan to the staff of the Dept. of Environmental Services for approval to increase the number of broad canopy trees in the project. Suggested species include Eucalyptus citriodora, Eucalyptus camaldulensis (Eucalyptus rostrata), and Mexican Ash Majestic Beauty. AGREEMENT I accept and agree, prior to use of this permit or approval, to comply with all the conditions set forth, and understand that the Department of Building and Safety will not issue a building permit or allow occupancy on the use permitted until this signed confirmation has been received by the Department of Environmental Services. Date Applicant's Signature Off IE:I�n-Tnc 1�� 3�Iioi� 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION REPORT Date: Sept. 7, 1977 REPORT ON: 68 Condominium Units CASE NO.: 85MF ZONE: PR-7, S.P. LOCATION: Deep Canyon Tennis Club APPLICANT: J. M. PETERS CO., INC. NATURE OF APPROVAL SOUGHT: Final Construction Drawings DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION: After reviewing the submitted plans and the presentations by the staff and by the applicant, the DRB approved this project, subject to the attached conditions. Date of Action: Sept. 6, 1977 Motion Made By: Johnson Seconded By: Minturn Vote: Reasons for e ative Vote (s): An appeal o Nt e above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision.) STAFF CO LMENTS: Placed on Planning Commission meeting agenda of Sept. 14, 1977. CITY 'PALM DESERT 45-2?5 PRICKLY PEAR LANE PALM DESERT CA. 92260(714)e46-0611 JL�TMOm M� )ns 0 5M m3 DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION APR. NO. DATE REC. (DO NOT WRIT£ IN THIS SPACE; APPLICANT (Please print) ca l (NAM E) !G� L7JV� s7 7 c2 / �' /Q /� QQ 61S�L r�7 (Mailing address) (Tale' hone) ll�iL"Tl , t L 22 oO (City) State (Zip -Code) Request:( describe specific nature of approval requested) xi5gac� f}j&rwVRL Oqzr 4N (68 UN/T13) or- 7A�4c-T 4558 -4vanm"C. /7 BU/[-OfAlq-5 A-5 o l7 -IN450 ON �5v 1 ,4AW c� pIi(I(C7 {CLAN Property Description: 7RACT NO. 9f55572) Assessors Parcel No. Existing Zoning Existing Gen. Plan Designation Property Owner e yjlcjyrsignad states tha-t/IAey are)" owner(s) of the property described herein and hereby give t r lion for the filing Is aoDIi tion. Agreement Absolving the City of Palm Desf/rt of oVabilities relative to any Deed Restrictions. I DO BY MY SIGNATURE THIS AGREE ME I absol the City of Palm Desert of all liabilities regarding any deed rest Lions that may be applicable to the property lld,ess//�yy''rffibed herein. Signature DateF. Applicants Signature re (for staff use only) ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS ❑ MINISTERIAL ACT E.A. No. ❑ CATEGORICA EXEMPTION ❑ NEGATIVE DECLARATION ❑ OTHER NOTE: APPLICANT MUST ALSO COMPLETE RELATED SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION 8IA2 liz Date Accepted by: CASE No. 85 W Reference Case No. 4= ORIGINAL PILE COPY ` F,IN L CITY OF PALM DESERT SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION FORM DESIGN REVIEW BOARD PROCESS Design Review of: TYPE OF PROJECT APPLICANT STAFF USE ONLY: CASE NO. DATE ACTOR (Staff, D.R.B., P.C., or C.C. ACTION APPLICANT NOTIFIED The Design Review Board process is the method by which the City of Palm Desert reviews detailed design and construction plans prior to the issuance of a building permit. DEPARTMENT DESIGN PLANNING APPLICATION OF ENVIRON- REVIEW COMMISSION MENTAL BOARD (APPROVES OR SERVICES DENIES PROJECT) STAFF (ADVISORY) INTERIOR REMODELS, MINOR ELECTRICAL, MECHANICAL, OR PLUMBING PERMITS 0 DEPARTMENT BUILDING AND CONSTRUCT SAFETY b ION Department of Environmental Services Form 1: Approved by Planning Commission on Page Two City of Palm Desert Supplemental Application Form DESIGN REVIEW BOARD PROCESS SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES and similar projects require 2-4 working days before they may be submitted to the Building and Safety Division for plan check. MULTI -FAMILY, COMMERCIAL, and other projects that must be reviewed by the D.R.B. and Planning Commission usually require 10-20 days. In order to facilitate processing, the applicant or a designated representative should attend the review hearings to answer questions which may arise regarding the project. MANDATORY FINDINGS: No project may be approved unless: - The proposed development conforms to any legally adopted development standards. - The design and location of the proposed development and its relationship to neighboring, existing or proposed developments and traffic is such that it will not impair the desirability of investment or occupation in the neighbor- hood; and that it will not unreasonably interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring, existing or proposed developments, and that it will not create traffic hazards or congestion. - The design and location of the proposed development is in keeping with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and is not detrimental to the har- monious, orderly, and attractive development contemplated by the Zoning Or- dinance and the adopted General Plan of the City. - The design and location of the proposed development would provide a desirable environment for its occupants, as well as for its neighbors and that it is aesthetically of good composition, materials, textures and colors. - The proposed use conforms to all the requirements of the zone in which it is located and all other applicable requirements. - The overall development of the land shall be designed to ensure the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: Each project will be reviewed on the basis of its conformance to the following adopted development standards. In those areas determined by the D.R.B. to be "unacceptable", it is the responsibility of the applicant to redesign that por- tion of the project. TERRAIN CONTROL STANDARDS UNACCEPTABLE A. Terrain and soils shall be structurally stable and suitable for development. J Page Three City of Palm Desert Supplemental Application Form DESIGN REVIEW BOARD PROCESS . I. TERRAIN CONTROL STANDARDS (continued) UNACCEPTABLE " B. (Water Erosion) Property to be developed shall be protected against drainage runoff from adjacent properties. C. (Water Erosion) Drainage runoff produced by property and development therein shall be contained on the property or allowed to drain onto adjacent public streets or allowed to drain by other City approved means. D. (Wind Erosion) Property to be developed shall be protected against wind carried deposits from adjacent areas. E. (Wind Erosion) Property to be developed shall, upon com- pletion, produce no appreciable wind carried deposits on adjacent properties. Suitable soil stabilization shall be provided. F. Curb and gutters shall be provided where required to control and regulate drainage. II. ACCESS & CIRCULATION STANDARDS A. Safe & convenient vehicle access to property and development therein shall be provided. B. Safe and convenient pedestrian access to property and development therein shall be provided. C. Circulation plans (auto, bicycle, and pedestrian) shall conform to municipally developed circulation plans for the vicinity and immediate area, III. SITE PLANNING STANDARDS A. Site Planning shall occur in a manner which minimizes obstruc- tion of scenic views from adjacent properties. B. Site Planning shall be compatible with existing terrain. C. Site Planning shall occur in a manner which does not expose unattractive areas or activities to the detriment of adjacent properties. D. Site Planning shall occur in a manner in which asphalt or concrete is minimized. E. Avoid unnecessary impediments for handicapped persons. Page Four City of Palm Desert Supplemental Application Form DESIGN REVIEW BOARD PROCESS UNACCEPTABLE IV. UTILITY & EQUIPMENT STANDARDS A. All service utility lines shall be placed underground. B. All control panels, vaults and necessary equipment shall be architecturally screened or landscaped or other- wise concealed from public view. C. All air conditioning and ventilation equipment shall be located and screened in a manner to prevent exposure to public rights -of -way and adjacent properties. V. VEHICLE PARKING STANDARDS A. Off-street parking should be located in proximity to facilitie(s) it serves. B. Parking areas should be screened from view wherever possible by means of berms, garden walls and landscaping. C. Parking areas shall be shaded where practical. D. Carports for apartment developments shall not front onto a public right-of-way. E, Garages should be encouraged not to front onto a public right-of-way. F. All parking areas for recreational and accessory vehicles and trailers shall be architecturally screened or landscaped or otherwise concealed from public view. G. Adequate handicapped parking spaces shall be provided. VI. ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS A. A singular architectural theme shall be applied to a given -structure or complex. (including facade architecture). B. Architectural design shall be applied to entire structure or complex rather than just to those sides exposed to public view. C. Architectural design shall be appropriate to the climatic conditions of the desert area and shall be done in a manner which minimizes the consumption of energy required for heating and cooling. D. Entrances shall include appropriate lighting and identification. E. Architectural design shall employ materials and colors which are compatible and complementary to the desert area. Page Five City of Palm Desert Supplemental Application Form DESIGN REVIEW BOARD PROCESS UNACCEPTABLE VI. ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS (continued) F. Architectural design shall incorporate provisions for signage (if applicable) as an integrated part of the overall design. G. Architecture and landscaping shall be co-ordinated and com- plementary. H, All air conditioning, exhaust, and ventilation, accessory mechanical and electrical equipment and control panels shall be located and screened in a manner to prevent exposure to public rights -of -way and adjacent properties. VII. LANDSCAPING STANDARDS A. Landscaping shall be an integral part of the site planning and architectural design on all projects. B. Provisions for the adequate maintenance and irrigation of landscaping shall be made through the use of underground irrigation systems. C. Landscaping, walls and fences shall not create unsafe conditions along public rights -of -way. VIII. LIGHTING, IDENTIFICATION & SIGNAGE STANDARDS A. Signage shall be architecturally integrated with the structure involved. B. Signage shall be of colors compatible and complementary to the structure it relates to and to other development in its surroundings. C. No lighting of signage shall exceed an output of 10 candle- power at 10 feet. D. Signage for commercial uses shall be for identification pur- poses only. IX. FENCING. SCREENING & ENCLOSURE STANDARDS A. Materials and colors of fences and walls shall be compatible and complementary to the structures with which they relate. B. Fences, walls, and enclosures shall be handled as an integrated part of the architecture and landscaping. C. Outside service and storage areas, where permitted, shall be enclosed and screened. Page Six City of Palm Desert Supplemental Application Form DESIGN REVIEW BOARD PROCESS UNACCEPTABLE IX. FENCING, SCREENING & ENCLOSURE STANDARDS (continued) D. Fences and walls shall not obstruct line -of -sight along public rights -of -way. X. SERVICE AREA STANDARDS A. Service areas shall be designed and constructed of materials and colors which are compatible and complementary to the structures of complexes they serve. B. Service areas shall be located in a manner which does not adversely affect adjacent properties. C. Service areas shall be screened and/or enclosed to prevent their exposure to public rights -of -way and adjacent pro- perties. Page Seven City of Palm Desert Supplemental Application Form DESIGN REVIEW BOARD PROCESS DESIGN REVIEW BOARD PROCESS SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS An "APPLICATION PACKAGE" shall contain: - The completed Application Form. - The appropriate fee as required by the attached Fee Schedule. - Photographs of the site and adjacent properties, particularly adjacent buildings. (At the request of the Staff) - Three (3) complete sets of plans for staff reviewed cases or six (6) complete sets for all others. The "PLANS" shall consist of the following: I. General Information Block (to include:) A. Street, block number, tract B. County Assessor's parcel number (9 digits) C. Legal description of property D. Owner's name, address, and phone number E. Designer's name, address, and phone number F. Any special information or conditions pertaining to the site or to the plans II. Vicinity Map (no scale) A. Major street names B. Other reference points and landmarks III. Site Anal sis & PreliminaryDrainage & Grading(to scale) to include: A. North arrow B. Scale C. General drainage pattern of area to include site and adjacent properties within 100' (use arrows to show drainage flow to and from site). D. Existing contour lines including property corners E. Proposed locations of structures and drives F. Elevations of pads and finished floors G. Finished grades H. Elevations of existing street centerline I, Retaining walls (where applicable) J. Perimeter walls and fences which affect drainage Page Eight City of Palm Desert Supplemental Application Form DESIGN REVIEW BOARD PROCESS IV. Plot Plan (to scale & sufficient size to include:) A. Scale B. North arrow C. Property lines D. Lot dimensions E. Public rights -of -way with existing and proposed dimensions (include street names) F. Existing or proposed curb lines G. Any and all easements H. All utility line locations (gas, electric, cable, water, and sewer) I. Adjacent property uses (showing approximate location of structures and other pertinent features) J. Major vehicle, bicycle, and pedestrian access points to and from site (use arrows of different widths to show direction and intensity of use) K. Setback areas L. All existing and proposed structures M. Interior vehicle, bicycle, and pedestrian circulation patterns (if applicable) N. Off-street parking (to include spaces, regulatory devices, provisions for accessory vehicle storage where applicable, etc.) 0. Parking areas for bicycles and carts (if applicable) P. Service areas and facilities to include: (1) trash storage areas (2) mail delivery boxes (3) loading areas Perimeter fencing and screening Proposed sign locations (if applicable) Information Block (if applicable) to include: A. Acreage and square footage calculations B. Ratio of structures to total land area C. Ratio of parking spaces to building square footage D. Parking requirements provided E. Ratio of landscaping to total land area F. Any specific information of special conditions particularly relevant to the project VI. Elevations of all Sides of all Structures (to scale and with dimensions Page Nine City of Palm Desert Supplemental Application Form DESIGN REVIEW BOARD PROCESS VII. Elevations of Signs (if applicable) VIII. Elevations of Fencing, Perimeter Screening and Walled Areas IX. Description of Materia One set of plans shall show elevations accurately colored to depict actual appearance of proposed structures or material board. X. Floor Plans of all structures (to scale) with dimensions XI. Landscape, Irrigation, and Exterior Lighting Plan (to include:) A. Landscaping, showing location of all trees, shrubs, plants, and ground cover in those areas subject to public view B. Variety and size of vegetation shall be noted C. Irrigation provisions for maintaining aforementioned landscaping D. Lighting provisions for lighting driveways, entrances, yards, premises, parking areas, etc. E. Perimeter treatment of property (fences, wall, vegetation screens, etc.) F. Street furniture and ornamentation, if applicable, (to include:) 1) rock outercroppings 2) benches 3) fountains and waterscapes plot plan 4) newspaper stands 5) statues 6) etc.