Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout92MF VAN HUISEN-WALTERS DEVELOPMENTVAN HUISEN—WALTERS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY 74-725 Highway One Eleven , Palm Desert, CA 92260 Telephone; (714) 346-5585 October 9, 1980 City of Palm Desert Department of Enviromental Services Planning Division 45-275 Prickley Pear Lane Palm Desert, California 92260 Attention: Mr. Phil Drell Assistant Planner Dear Mr. Drell: Pursuant to our telephone conversation of this date, this is our Request of the Planning Division to give the Building Department authorization to issue Final Inspections on various Units at the Mountain Villas Condominum Project, Tract 11883-2. Van Huisen-Walters Development Company agrees to hold requests -of the Building Department for Final Inspections on Units 1 thru 6, at the following addresses listed below, pending the Department of Enviromental Services approval of the entire project. Unit 1: 45-426 Driftwood Drive Unit 4: 45-420 Driftwood Drive Unit 2: 45-424 Driftwood Drive Unit 5: 45-416 Driftwood Drive Unit 3: 45-422 Driftwood Drive Unit 6: 45-414 Driftwood Deive If you should require any further information regarding the above authorization, please give me a call. Sincerely, 7Z! + 1� Greg Van Huisen General Manager GV:dj 0� -� S)rL� /0 , 2J - JV DESIGN REVIEW BOARD CASE NO 92 MF APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) IDA ITEM NO. III, A-4 DATE September 23, 1980 VAN HUISEN-WALTERS DEVELOPMENT CO., (74725 Hwy 111, P.D.) and WALLACE CONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT CO. (49518 Cedar Ave., Morongo Valley, CA 9ZZ56) NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT Approval of final landscaping lan for 56 unit condominium project. LOCATION Approx. midway between Hwy 111 and Candlewood, at the easterly end ot Shadow Hills Rd. ZONE M. This item was previously reviewed at the meeting of April 22, 1950. At that time, the Board continued the item in order for the applicant to submit more detail on the entry design. This information has now been submitted. Therefore, the applicant is requesting approval of the landscaping plans. The subject condominium project is presently under construction on the site. A previous landscaping plan had been approved for the site. The applicants are now requesting approval of the revised landscaping plan. Two requirements were that all trees be a minimum of 15 gallons in size, with all shrubs a minimum of 5 gallons in size. The revised plan does comply with these requirements. One other requirement was that trees be provided along the east side of the tennis courts. The applicant does indicate a 24" box size olive tree immediately to the east of the courts. Additionally, a row of oleanders along the northern boundary of the tennis courts are indicated. The applicant is also requesting approval to light the tennis courts. The original conditions of approval require that the landscape treatment around the proposed tennis courts be such that glare is reduced. STAFF ANAYLSIS: The Board should review the revised landscaping plans to determine acceptability. It appears to staff that the original plan is superior to the original plan. The Board should review the tennis court lighting to ensure that glare will be reduced onto adjacent properties. Y ,y1y �w T i a •fir �tttr, rt. nl � - e ..i 1f . y F• LANDSCAPE SUBJECT: Specifications and ExpAination of Terms - landscape Design for Van Huisen Walters Project - "Mountain Villas" A �t / DATE: 15 March 1980 SCALE: 1" - 20' 1. General.. The attached Landscape.Design is separated in several sections in order to facilitate interpretation. Several symbols are used to capitalize on available space. Explanation off' these symbols are set forth in Paragraph 3. Sizes of trees are set forth on the design within the individual tree symbol. Further'explauatien is found in the following, paragraphs. 2. Shrubs. All shrubs are to be a minimum size of five gallons. They are planted with a spacing of 30". All shrubs must be screened and tborouhly weeded prior to installation. All shrubs must meet industry standards for size and,apfearance. The following explanation of symbols is provided: 1 - Heavenly Bamboo (Nandina Domestica) 2 - "Petite Pink" Oleander (Nerium Oleander -Dwarf) 3 - Photinia Frazeri 4 - Hibiscus (Hibiscus Rosa - Sinensis) 5 - Raphiolepsis - MaJesti'c Beauty 6 - Natal Plum (Carrissa Tuttelei) 7 - Oleander (Nerium Oleander) I 3, Trees. The;?#rees are the'key to any landscappe. Sizes are depicted within the tree symbol on the dlsign. The following, symbols were used: FN Ficus Nitida (Indian Laurel) RL - Ehus Lancea (Africaa;Sumac) SD - Sterculia Diversifol#a (Bottle Tree.) PC Pinus,Canariensis (Canary Islan Pine) Jacaranda Mimosifolia Multiple Trunck �1 / Full Size Field Grown Olive p Chamaerons Humilus (Mediterreanean Fan Palm) -- 4. M&mdcovers. Ground covers 'lire to be flamed 6 inches on center. Areas not labeled are to be grass. The lawn will be a Winter Aye for Winter months and. Hybrid Bermuda for Summer months. All weeds are to be removed to include root systems. All grass areas are to be seeded with a broadcast type spreader delivering an even distribution of seed. Initial application of seed shall be at a rate of 500 pounds per acre. Area will then be cover-d with a one quarter inch of seed cover. 30 days after initial seeding Contractor must reseed all bare spots as l;,ri,sted above. The €e4 oirin symbols were used to designate specific grbundcovers: CITY OF ,t PALM DESERT A - Annual Color DEPARTMENT B - Gazania. (in variety) of - H ericum Cal cium ENVIRONMENTAL C YP �` sERvrcEs EXNiB!T NO. __.___._... _._....... CASEam�--._.. v Landscape Design.Specifications and Explanations for Van Huisen M1 Walters "Mountain Villas" continued, 5, Fertilization. Apply nitrolized redwood sawdust at a rate of 5 cubic Yards per 1000 square feet an 10 pounds commercial fert- ilizer per 1000 square feet. All tr*o and shrubs shall recieve Agri form Tablets, 6. Boulders shall be located by the Designer. 7. Bender Board Ssperation.. All graorry areas are to be seperated from all grouncover areas and shruir,areas by use of 1" Redwood Bender board. 8. Final Cleari - up. All planted areas must be fine raked and smooth. All areas must present a neat manicured appearance. 9. The following is a lift of Plant Materials required to satisfy the design: Trees Full Size Field Grown Olives 24"'Box Olive Tree (Multi") 36" box Jacaranda Mimosifolia "Multi" 24" Box Jacaramda Mimopifolia "tiulti" 24" Box Ficus Nitida 15 Gal Ficu$ Nitida 24" Box Pinus Canariensis 24" Box Sterculia Diversifolia 15 Gal Ster'culia Diversifolfa 15 Gal Chamaerops Humilus "Multi" 15 Gal Rhus Lancea SHRUBS` Nandina Domestica 5 Gallon Dwarf Oleander " Photinia Frazeri " Hibiscus " Raphiolepsis " Natal Plum " Oleander " 17 Each 19 Each 4 Each 20 Each 13 Each 20 Each 10 Each 14 Each 7 Each 15 Each 9 Each 153 Each 287 Each 294 Each 302 Each 251 Each 62 Each 40 Each 10 Contours. All contours depicted are 12" seperation. to be installed so as facilitate prgper drainage flow. 9 .. F • �a e a They are 'Aez� ,J , yourIr , ; -r,- f`� e III. CASES (Continued) Case No. 102 C - FRANK GILBERT AND SGPA PLANNING AND ARCHITECTURE (Continued) On a motion by Barton, seconded by Leung, the Board approved the final parking lot plan with the following conditions: 1. Landscaping shall be completed by December, should Phase II fall behind schedule. 2. Concrete light pillars shall be colored or tinted. 3. The light standard used should be the same type of down -shining light presently used in the Center. Carried 5_0 (Barton, Holden, Jackson, Leung, Martin). Case No. 92 MF - VAN HUISEN-WALTERS DEVELOPMENT CO. AND COX ENTERPRISES - approval of final landscaping plan for 56 unit condominium project; Steve Cox was present. Ms. Jackson informed the applicant that the choice and size of trees and other landscape materials were well chosen. Mr. Holden noted that the plans showed some detail but no elevation of the entry areas or the placement of the project identification sign. On a motion by Martin, seconded by Holden, the Board decided to continue this case until working drawings for the completion of the project entrance are submitted. Carried 5-0 (Barton, Holden, Jackson, Leung, Martin). Case No. 131 C - CHALFONT COMMUNICATIONS, INC. - preliminary and final approval of building addition and parking lot improvements for building located at 73-680 Highway 111; Tom Lemon was present. The Board reviewed the project with the applicant. Mr Martin felt that the landscaping would look better on the east side rather than on the:west side of the lot. The applicant replied that a recently installed emergency power unit is located on the east side of the lot. Mr. Holden informed the applicant that the Building"Department may require handicapped parking stalls. Two other concerns were expressed by the Board. First, the entrance door to the building addition interferes with the adjacent parking space. The Board felt that this could be solved by relocating the trash enclosure. The second concern was to move the trash enclosure to the west corner in order to move the parking spaces down. The applicant agreed to this request. The applicant was reminded that screening of the parking lot, either by landscaping or a three foot wall, would be required at the old location of the trash bins. On a motion by Holden, seconded by Martin, the Board approved the application with the following conditions: 1. All parking spaces be double striped. 2. Trash enclosure be relocated to the northwest corner of the lot and addi- tional landscaping or three foot high wall be constructed at the present location of the trash enclosure. 3. The stucco finish of the new addition should match the existing structure. 4. Replace pepper tree with either a Ficus Nidia or eucalyptus tree; choice to be submitted to Staff for approval. Carried 5-0 (Barton, Holden, Jackson, Leung, Martin). ,► 416 (:Uftnl� ohs IF'saZl=��i 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 REPORT OF DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION CASE NO: 92 MF APPLICANT: Van Huisen-Walters Development Co. & Wallace Construction and Development C NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of final landscaping plan for 56 unit condominium project. LOCATION: Approx. midway between Hwy 111 and Candlewood, at.the easterly end of Shadow Hills Rd. ZONE: PR-6 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION: Upon reviewing the submitted plans and the presentations by the Staff and by the applicant, the Design Review Board approves this project, subject to revisions. Date of Action: Sept.23, 1980 Vote: 6-0 (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision.) STAFF COMMENTS: See attached minutes f I II III MINUTES DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING TUESDAY - SEPTEMBER 23, 1980 CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS The meeting was called to order at 2:30 p.m. after a 22 hour study session. MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT: STAFF PRESENT Vern Barton Al Cook Rick Holden Bernie Leung Charles Martin Eric Johnson Phyllis Jackson Stan Sawa On a motion by Leung, seconded by Martin, the Board approved the minutes of September 9, 1980, subject to revisions to Case No. 178 MF. Carried 4-0-2 (Holden, Leung, Martin, Johnson, with Barton and Cook abstaining). Minutes Motion approving cases found acceptable at the study session: Case No. 208 MF- DAVID HEUSI•NKVELD - Approval of final working draw- ings for carports and new open parking spaces at 73-415 Shadow Mountain Drive. This item was approved subject to the plans being noted that colors and materials will match existing buildings and that any landscaping being moved to facilitate construction, shall be relocated onto site. r' Case No. 210 MF- KAUFMAN & BROAD and BOB BUCCI - Approval of revised landscaping and site plan for 47 Unit Condominium Project on the north side of Hovley Lane, approximately 2,250 feet east of Monterey Avenue; Ed Yeager was present. Th' proved as submitted. Case No. 92 MF- VAN HEUISEN-WALTERS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY & WALLACE DNS AND DEVELOPMENT COMPANY- Approval of final landscaping plan for 56 Unit Condominium project, located approximately mid -way between Highway Ill and Candlewood Street, at the easterly end of Shadow Hills Road; Greg Van Heuisen was present. This item was approved with the requirement that 5 gallon Oleanders be provided at 5 feet on center on the north and south ends of the tennis court areas. On a motion by Holden, seconded by Cook, the Board moved to approve the above items as stipulated. Carried 6-0 (Barton, Cook, Holden, Leung, Martin, and Johnson). CASES Case No. 159 MF- FRANK OLIVER- Approval of modification to final working drawings for pre-school under construction at the northwest corner of Alessandro drive and Cabrillo Avenue; applicant was not present. Staff presented the report, noting that the items requested previously have been submitted. The Board stated that they were disappointed that the applicant has not followed the approved plans from the begin- ning. The Board felt that the dormers could have been constructed as approved. They generally felt that it would be better to leave the Continues oil nn�Ia ®�c� 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 February 27, 1980 Van Huisen-Walters Development 74-725 Highway 111 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Attn: Elizabeth J. Hoven Re: DP 11-77 and 92 MF Ladies/Gentlemen: Relative to our recent conversation, please be advised that as you continue to implement the project contemplated in the approved Development Plan (Case No. DP 11-77), that approval remains valid. An extension of time would only be necessary if some portion of the project had not begun within a year from the date of final approval. A condition of the Development Plan did require that the project be promptly completed, therefore, if you anti- cipate a delay in completing the final phase (the condo -hotel) you might submit a phasing schedule and request that the City Council approve a modi- fication of City Council Ordinance No. 172, Section 3-C, to clarify the situation. This request should be accompanied by a $50.00 filing fee. Turning to Design Review Case No. 92 MF, it is noted that approval is valid for a one year period. Your letter of December 27, 1979, requesting a time extension was received two months after the case approval expired. There- fore, I would suggest that you refile for Design Review a month or two before you desire to go into plan check for a building permit, to reactivate approval of the condo -hotel. If you have any questions regarding these or other matters, please feel free to contact this office. Very truly yours, PAUL A. WILLIAMS, AICP DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES MURREL CRUMP PRINCIPAL PLANNER /lr 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 REPORT- OF DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION CASE NO: 92 MF APPLICANT: Cox Enterprises NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of final landscaping plan for 56 unit condominium project. LOCATION: Approx. mid -way between Hwy 111 and Candlewood St., at the easterly end of Shadow Hills Rd. ZONE: RP-6 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION: Upon reviewing the submitted plans and the presentations by the Staff and !y the applicant, the Design Review Board continues this project, subject to revisions. Date of Action: April 22, 1980 Vote: Kxxx �� x�cxx�xxxiXa>px�acac x cxx�xxxxxx cxx cxnt xh�cxi mxx cx�tac Rx>�h9a�aU)W O(z cxmxxxttaxx)(Xi xxxxx�xR)axDoxxk>x�c� x)cumxzk�l*9 xkxlxtxx)=xxxk ��Gtc x XxAM dxx)tcxaxx)=O(X)o (XI)6mxxax� STAFF COMMENTS: See attached minutes r 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (7141 346-0611 :REPORT- OF DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION CASE NO:. 92 MF APPLICANT: Van Huisen-Walters Development Co. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of final landscaping plan for 56 unit condominium project. LOCATION: Approx. mid -way between State Hwy 111 and Candlewood Street, at the easterly end of Shadow Hills Rd. ZONE: PR-6 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION: Upon reviewing the submitted plans and the presentations by the Staff and ty the applicant, the Design Review Board continues this project, subject to revisions. Date of Action: Vote: April 22, 1980 .39 STAFF COhIM ENTS: See attached minutes f III CASES (Continued) Case No. 102 C - FRANK GILBERT AND SGPA PLANNING AND ARCHITECTURE (Continued) On a motion by Barton, seconded by Leung, the Board approved the final parking lot plan with the following conditions: 1. Landscaping shall be completed by December, should Phase II fall behind schedule. 2. Concrete light pillars shall be colored or tinted. 3. The light standard used should be the same type of down -shining light presently used in the Center. Carried 5-0 (Barton, Holden, Jackson, Leung, Martin). Case No. 92 MF VAN HUISEN-WALTERS DEVELOPMENT CO. AND COX ENTERPRISES - approval of al landscaping plan for 56 unit condominium project; Steve Cox wa present. Ms. Jackson informed the applicant that the choice and size of trees and other landscape materials were well chosen. Mr. Holden noted that the plans showed some detail but no elevation of the entry areas or the placement of the project identification sign. On a motion by Martin, seconded by Holden, the Board decided to continue this case until working drawings for the completion of the project entrance are submitted. Carried 5-0 (Barton, Holden, Jackson, Leung, Martin). Case No. 131 C - CHALFONT COMMUNICATIONS, INC. - preliminary and final approval of building addition and parking lot improvements for building located at 73-680 Highway 111; Tom Lemon was present. The Board reviewed the project with the applicant. Mr Martin felt that the landscaping would look better on the east side rather than on the west side of the lot. The applicant replied that a recently installed emergency power unit is located on the east side of the lot. Mr. Holden informed the applicant that the Building"Department may require handicapped parking stalls. Two other concerns were expressed by the Board. First, the entrance door to the building addition interferes with the adjacent parking space. The Board felt that this could be solved by relocating the trash enclosure. The second concern was to move the trash enclosure to the west corner in order to move the parking spaces down. The applicant agreed to this request. The applicant was reminded that screening of the parking lot, either by landscaping or a three foot wall, would be required at the old location of the trash bins. On a motion by Holden, seconded by Martin, the Board approved the application with the following conditions: 1. All parking spaces be double striped. 2. Trash enclosure be relocated to the northwest corner of the lot and addi- tional landscaping or three foot high wall be constructed at the present location of the trash enclosure. 3. The stucco finish of the new addition should match the existing structure. 4. Replace pepper tree with either a Ficus Nidia or eucalyptus tree; choice to be submitted to Staff for approval. Carried 5-0 (Barton, Holden, Jackson, Leung, Martin). i DESIGN REVIEW BOARD CASE NO. 92 MF &DA ITEM NO. III, A-4 DATE April 22, 1980 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) Van Huisen-Walters Development Co. (74-725 Highway 111, Palm Desert, CA 92260) and Cox Enterprises (P.O. Box 299, Indio, CA 92201 NATUR OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT Approval of final landscaping plan for LOCATION Approximately mid -way between State Highway 111 and Candlewood Street, at the easterly end of Shadow Hills Road. ZONE PR-6 In addition to this condominium project, single family residences are being constructed to the south and a hotel/condominium project is planned to the north. The subject condominium project is presently under construction on the subject property. A previous landscaping plan had been approved for the site. The applicants are now submitting a revised final landscaping plan. Two requirements were that all trees be a minimum of 15 gallons in size and all shrubs be a minimum of five gallons in size. The revised plan submitted does comply with these requirements. One other requirement was that trees be provided along the east side of the tennis courts. The applicants do indicate a row of oleanders along the northerly boundary of the tennis courts along with a 24 inch box size olive tree immediately to the east of the courts. STAFF ANALYSIS: The Board should review the revised landscaping plans to determine accepta- bility. It appears to Staff that the plan is superior to the original plan. Should the Board desire additional screening of the tennis courts, additional trees and/or oleanders can be provided. SUBJECT: Specifications and Explanation of Terms - land .Ecape Project - "Mountain Villas" Design for Van Huisen Walters DATE: 15 March 1980 _ SCALE: 1" - 20' 1. General.. The attached Landscape.Design is separated in several sections in order to facilitate interpretation. Several symbols are Explanation A these symbols used to capitalize on availa.ble.space. 3. Sizes of trees are set forth on the are set forth in Paragraph the individual tree symbol. Further`explanatien is r, design within found in the following paragraphs. 2. Shrubs. All shrubs are to be a minimum size of five gallons. All must be screened They are Planted with a spacing of 30". shrubs and thoroughly weeded prior to installation. All shrubs must meet, + explanation industry standards for size and appearance." The following of symbols is provided: 1 _ Heavenly Bamboo (Nandina Domestica) "Petite Pink" Oleander (Perium Oleander -Dwarf). 2 3 _ Photinia Frazeri 4 - Hibiscus (Hibiscus Rosa - Sinensis) 5 - F Raphiolepsis - MaJestic Beauty 6 _ Natal Plum (Carrissa Tuttelei) 7 - Oleander (Nerium Oleander) 3. Trees. The,*rees are the'key to any landscape. Sizes are depicted wi.thin'the tree symbol on the dosign. The following- symbols were used: FN - Ficus Nitida (Indian Laurel) RL - Rhus Lancea (African.Sumac) SD Sterculia Diversifolia (Bottle Tree,) PC - Pinus Canariensis (Canary Islan Pine) Jacaranda Mimosifolia Multiple Trunck --� Full Size Field Grown Olive 0 Chamaerops Humilus (Mediterreanean Fan Palm) - 4. 666undeovers. Ground covers are to be planted 6 inches on v center. Areas not labeled are to be grass. The lawn will be a Winter Rye for Winter months and Hybrid Bermuda for Summer months.',' All weeds are to be removed to include root systems. All grass areas are to be seeded with a broadcast type spreader delivering an even distribution of"seed. 'Initial application of seed shall be at a rate of 500 pounds per acre. Area will then be covseediwith a one quarter inch of seed cover. 30 days after initial g Contractor must reseed all bare spots as Listed. above. The:follCITY 0 symbols were used to designate specific ground covers: PALLI DESERT A - Annual Color DEPARTMENT OF B - Gazania. (in variety) ENV 1'2l 041ME,4TAL C - Hypericum Calycium sE:zvcEs - NO. CASE ' NO. IN Landscape Design. Specifications and Explanations for Van Huisen Walters "Mountain Villas",. continued. s• 5. Fertilization., Apply nitrolized r$dwcod sawdust at a rate of 5 cubic Yards per.1000 square feet an 10 pounds commercial fert- ilizer per 1000 square feet. All tre and shrubs shall recieve Agri form. Tablets. K 6. Boulders sha11 be located by the Designer. 7. Bender Board Seperation. All grassy areas are to be seperated v from all grouncover areas and shrublareas by use of 1" Redwood Bender board. 8. Final Clean; - up. All planted areas must be fine raked and " smooth. All areas must present a neat manicured appearance. } ' 9. The following is a list of Plant Materials required. to satisfy s the design: Trees Full Size Field Grown.Olives 17 Each , 2411'Box Olive Tree (Multi 19 Each '= 36" Box Jacaranda Mimosifolia "Multi" 4 Each `> 24" Box Jacaranda Mimosifolia $Multi" 20 Each 24" Box Ficus Nitida 13 Each 15 Gal Ficus Nitida 20 Each 24" Box Pinus Canariensis 10 Each 24" Box Sterculia Diversifolia 14 Each 15 Gal Sterculia Diversifolia 7 Each 15 Gal Chamaerops Humilus "Multi" 15 Each A' 15 Gal- Rhus Lancea 9 Each "€v ' SHRUBS n` N'andina Domestica 5 Gallon 153 Each x _ Dwarf Oleander " 287 Each ax' Photinia Frazeri " 294 Each:. Hibiscus " 302 Each Raphiolepsis " 251 Each Natal Plum " 62 Each Oleander " 40 Each 10 Contours. All contours depicted are 12" seperation. They are to be installed so as facilitate prpper drainage flow. 7 a-.r k�, Minutes Palm Desert Planning Commission October 24, 1978 Page Five 10. Case No. 92MF - AFFILIATED CONSTRUCTION - Final construction drawings for a condo/hotel and landscape plan for total condo/hotel and condominium pro- ject to be located on the southside of Highway 111 at City easterly limits. Applicant was present. The designation of tree varieties to be used throughout the project was the major issue resolved on this case. On a motion by Barton, seconded by Urrutia, the Board approved the final construction drawings with the following revisions: a. Building Elevations (Exhibits E, G, K, M) 1. Use parapet to hide compressors. b. Landscape Plan (Exhibit N) (Hotel) 1. All trees shall be a minimum 15 gal. size. At least 40% of all trees along Highway Ill and the entrance streets shall be a minimum 24" box in size. All shrubs shall be a minimum of 5 gal. in size. 2. Additional -trees such as palms and olives shall be provided along the south property line. c. Landscape Plan (Sheets 102 & 103) (Condos) 1. All shrubs shall be a minimum of 5 gal. in size. 2. Delete tree varieties shown on plan as numbers 14, 16, and 21 as they do not do well in desert. Replace with Chamus Superious Londi and Acacia Tongafolia. 3. Tree sizes shall be in accordance with the following: varieties numbered 1, 2, 3, 4, 9, & 10 shall be 24" box size and remaining varieties in 15 gal. size. Carried 4-0 (Barton, Urrutia, Hill, Johnson). 11. Th'e�lowing comments were 4rding the preliminary projects known as TT 13003 and DP 16-78: a. TT 13008 - Reduce length of cul-de-sacs to provide for better lot configu- '\ ration. b. DP 16-78 - Cul-de-sacs too long; restudy entrances; relocate maintenance building; restudy drainage; alleviate monotonous street scape by staggering buildings, varying setbacks, and/or providing side drives. 12. The meeting was adjourned `by Chairman Johnson at 9:00 p.m. ROWID R. KNIPPEL, Assista lanner rk/ks ** NOTE: After Case No. 87C Phyllis Jackson was excused from the meeting. Jim Hill voted in her place on the remaining cases. VAN HUISEN-WALTERS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY 74-725 Highway One Eleven . Palm Desert, CA 92260 Telephone, (714) 346-5585 December 27, 1979 City of Palm Desert !! �+ 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane !� CE IR it D Palm Desert, CA 92260 DEC 2 7 19 t Attn: Paul Williams ENVIRONMLNIAL SERVICES Director of Environmental Service CITY OF PALM DESERT Regarding: DP 1177 92MF Gentlemen: We are requesting an extension of the aforementioned permits which are due to expire on January 25, 1980. The subject extension should be for a period of one year. The previous extensions of the permits were granted to Affiliated Construction Co., from whom we have purchased the subject properties. We have experienced some delays in our ability to acquire financing. We would appreciate any cooperation that you might extend us in taking care of this matter as soon as possible. Yours truly, Bill Walters (Uti;wP oil 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION REPORT Date REPORT ON: CONDO/HOTEL Oct. 30, 1978 CASE NO.: 92MF ZONE: PC(4), S.P. and PR-7 LOCATION: South side of Highway 111 at City Easterly limits APPLICANT: AFFILIATED CONSTRUCTION NATURE OF APPROVAL SOUGHT: Final Construction Drawings DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION: After reviewing the submitted plans and the presentations by the staff and by the applicant, the DRB APPROVED this project, subject to revisions.. .. Date of Action Motion Made By Seconded By: Vote: Oct. 24, 1978 Barton Urrutia 4-0 Reasons for Negative Vote (s): (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City CZerk of the City of PaZm Desert within fifteen (Z5) days of the date of the decision.) STAFF COMMENTS: DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE: October 24, 1978 CASE NO.: 92 MF (Construction Drawings and Landscape Plans) APPLICANT: Affiliated Construction LOCATION: South of Hwy. 111 at Eastern City Limits ZONING: P.C. (4) S.P., PR-7 DP 11-77 related case - considered by Design Review Board on October 25, 1977, as preliminary plan. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve final construction drawings and landscape plan subject to the following corrections: Site Plan (Exhibit A) 1. Has slight variations from original, but is considered an improvement and conforms to original conditions of approval. Building Elevations (Exhibits E,G,K,M) 1. Was of major concern to Design Review Board in original review. Landscape Plan (Exhibit N) (Hotel) 1. All trees shall be a minimum 15 gal. size. At least 40% of all trees along Highway 111 and the entrance streets shall be a minimum 24" box in size. All shrubs shall be a minimum of 5 gal. in size. 2. Additional trees shall be provided along the south propertyline. Landscape Plan (Sheets 102 & 103) (Condos) 1. All trees shall be a minimum of 15 gal. in size and shrubs be a minimum of 5 gal. in size. 2. Provide trees along the east side of proposed tennis courts. Minutes Palm Desert Planning Commission October 24, 1978 Page Five 10. Case No. 92MF - AFFILIATED CONSTRUCTION - Final construction drawings for a condo/hotel and landscape plan for total condo/hotel and condominium pro- ject to be located on the southside of Highway 111 at City easterly limits. Applicant was present. The designation of tree varieties to be used throughout the project was the major issue resolved on this case. On a motion by Barton, seconded by Urrutia, the Board approved the final construction drawings with the following revisions: a. Building Elevations (Exhibits E, G, K, M) 1. Use parapet to hide compressors. b. Landscape Plan (Exhibit N) (Hotel) 1. All trees shall be a minimum 15 gal. size. At least 40% of all trees along Highway III and the entrance streets shall be a minimum 24" box in size. All shrubs shall be a minimum of 5 gal. in size. 2. Additional -trees such as palms and olives shall be provided along the south property line. c. Landscape Plan (Sheets 102 & 103) (Condos) 1. All shrubs shall be a minimum of 5 gal. in size. 2. Delete tree varieties shown on plan as numbers 14, 16, and 21 as they do not do well in desert. Replace with Chamus Superious Londi and Acacia Tongafolia. 3. Tree sizes shall be in accordance with the following: varieties numbered 1, 2, 3, 4, 9, & 10 shall be 24" box size and remaining varieties in 15 gal. size. Carried 4-0 (Barton, Urrutia, Hill, Johnson). 11. TO owing comments wer arding the preliminary projects known as 13008 and DP 16-78: a. TT 13 - Reduce length of cul-de-sacs to provide for better lot configu- ration. b. DP 16-78 - 1-de-sacs too long; restudy entrances; relocate maintenance bu ding; restudy drainage; alleviate monotonous street scape by s ggering buildings, varying setbacks, and/or providing side ives. 12. The meeting was adjourned"ty Chairman Johnson at 9:00 p.m. "Ze"';7 /�/ R N LD R. KNIPPEL, Assista Tanner rk/ks ** NOTE: After Case No. 87C Phyllis Jackson was excused from the meeting. Jim Hill voted in her place on the remaining cases. ©:ff �m= 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CAUFORNIA92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 January 5, 1979 CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF AN EXTENSION OF TIME ON THE APPROVAL OF A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP TO CREATE 65 LOTS TO PROVIDE FOR A CONDOMINIUM HOTEL, 7 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCES AND 57 CONDOMINIUM UNITS ON APPROXIMATELY 17.8 ACRES GENERALLY LOCATED BETWEEN HIGHWAY 111 AND CANDLEWOOD STREET, WEST OF THE PALM DESERT-INDIAN WELLS CITY LIMIT LINE. CASE NO. TT 11883 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held before the Palm Desert City Council to consider a request by U. S. LIFE SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION for approval of a 1-year extension of time on the approval of a Tentative Tract Map to create 1 lot for a Condominium Hotel within the P.C.(4), S.P. (Planned Commercial Resort, Scenic Preservation Overlay) zone and 57 lots for condominium purposes and 7 lots for single family residences within the PR-6 (Planned Residential, Maximum 6 d.u. per acre) zone on approximately 17.8 acres generally located between Highway 111 and Candlewood Street, west of the Palm Desert -Indian Wells City Limit Line, more particularly described as: APN 625-150-004 APN 625-150-005 APN 625-224-010 TTIISS3 SAID Public Hearing will be held on Thursday, January 25, 1979, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers in the Palm Desert City Hall, 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place, all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. SHEILA R. GILLIGAN, City Clerk City of Palm Desert, California PUBLISH: Palm Desert Post January 11, 1979 MINUTES PALM DESERT DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING SEPTEMBER 12, 1978 The meeting was called to order at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Palm Desert City Hall after an hour study session. Members present: Eric Johnson Bernie Leung Frank Urrutia Jim Hill Paul Williams Members absent: Vern Barton Phyllis Jackson Staff present: Murrel Crump Ralph Cipriani Ron Knippel It was moved by Williams, seconded by Leung, that the minutes of the meeting of August 22, 1978, be approved as written; carried 3-0-1 (AYES: Williams, Leung, Johnson; ABSTAIN: Urrutia). 2. Case No. 70C - GEORGE RITTER - Final construction drawings for a commercial structure to be located on the south side of Highway 111, west of Sage Lane. Applicant was present. Following presentation of this case, the Board requested that the applicant provide a clarification of the color and material to be used for the project. The applicant complied with this request. Further discussion of this case resolved the issue of appropriate landscape materials and sizes. On a motion by Williams, seconded by Leung, the Board approved the final con- struction drawings, subject to the applicant revising the landscaping plan in accordance with the plan on file in the office of Environmental Services; carried —0 ( 'lliams, Johnson, Leung, Urrutia). 3. Case No. 92MF - A FILIATED CONSTRUCTION - Final construction drawings for a hote 'condominiu project to be located on the south side of Highway 111, west of th alm Desert City limits. Applicant was present. The issues resolved were: the number of stories of each building; the use of stamp concrete; & fencing for the tennis courts. On a motion by Leung, seconded by Urrutia, the Board approved the final con- struction drawings; carried 4-0 (Leung, Urrutia, Williams; Johnson). 4. Case No. 141MF - ROBERT SHELDON - Preliminary site, floor and elevations for a four unit apartment building to be located at the northwest corner of San Gorgonio and Las Flores. Applicant not present. The issues resolved were: setback requirements in the parking area; provisions for additional landscaping; and, landscape materials. On a motion by Williams, seconded by Urrutia, the Board approved the preliminary site, floor and elevations subject to the following: a. Revise Special Condition No. 10 to reduce the setback between the carports and the adjacent units from 10 ft. to `s ft. b. The applicant shall provide an 18" planting strip along the west property line. c. Substitute ficus nitida or similar plant for pinus halepensis. Carried 4-0 (Williams, Urrutia, Leung, Johnson). J a 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 IGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION REPORT Date: Sept. 13, 1978 REPORT ON: Hotel - Condominium project CASE NO.: 92MF ZONE: P.C.(4), S.P. and PR-7 LOCATION: South side of Highway 111, west of Palm Desert City Limits APPLICANT: AFFILIATED CONSTRUCTION CO. NATURE OF APPROVAL SOUGHT: Final construction drawings DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION: After reviewing the submitted plans and the presentations by the staff and by the applicant, the DRB APPROVED this project, subject to the attached conditions. Date of Action _Motion Made By Seconded By: Vote: Sept. 12, 1978 Leung - Urrutia 4-0 Reasons for Negative Vote (s): (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen (l5) days of the date of the decision.) STAFF COMMENTS: DESIGN F.Eti'IE F BOARD CASE NO.: APPLICANT LOCATION: ZONING: 92MF - Sept. 12, 1978 AFFILIATED CONSTRUCTION South side of Highway 111, west of Palm Desert City Limits P.C. (4), S.P. and PR-7 _ STAFF RECOMMENDATION The landscaping plan for this project will be submitted at a later date when the construction drawings for the hotel portion of the project are submitted. Staff is recommending approval of the final construction drawings. Q (-,4ffiQiated Conthudiop Co., gne- September 11, 1978 City of Palm Desert Director of Environmental Services City Hall Palm Desert, California 92260 Re: Palm Desert Tract 11883 56 Condominium Units. Gentlemen: Please accept this letter as part of our exhibits for the D.R.B. final approvals and attached and made a part thereto. We agree that the interior drives shall be constructed of "STAMPCRETE", instead of normal asphalt. We agree to install perimeter walls of Brown slump block with slump cap. , President RUCTION CO., INC. FRG:mmi EXECUTIVE OFFICES: 77-900 AVENUE OF THE STATES PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 PHONE: (714) 345-2626 FRANK R. GOODMAN, President Contractor's License No. 186863 RICHARD OLIPHANT, Vice Presiden. q CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL DP 11-77 PLANNING C0MMISSION RESOLUTION NO. I. STANDARD CONDITIONS Page Two 1. The development of this project shall conform substantially to all plans submitted in behalf of this case (Exhibits A-G), and as revised according to the Design Review Board rpocess and/or Planning Commission Action. Any minor changes require approval by the Director of Environmental Services. Any substantial change requires approval by the Planning Commission. 2. All requirements of any law, ordinance, or regulation of the State, City, and any other applicable government entity shall be complied with as part of the development process.. 3. This approval is applicable, subject to the development of this project, commencing within one year from approval date and being promptly completed. 4. Any roof mounted, exhause, or air conditioning equipment shall be fully concealed from view from any public rights -of -way and adjoining properties by architecturally integrated means. 5. Construction plans shall be submitted for approval to the City Fire Marshal prior to issuance of building permits. All condi- tions shall be made a part of construction and no certificate of occupancy shall be issued until completed. Note Fire Marshal's letter dated October 19, 1977 attached hereto for requirements. 6. All utility service and distribution lines on or abutting the subject property, shall be placed undergound prior to occupancy clearance. 7. Traffic control provisions shall be provided as required by the City Engineer. 8. Curb, gutter, sidewalk or approved pathways, and tie-in paving shall be provided in conformance with City Standards and/or as required by the City Engineer. 9. A landscaping, grading, lighting, amenities, trash storage, walk- way layout, and irrigation plan shall be submitted through the Design Review Board. No final inspection or occupancy permit shall be given by the Department of Environmental Services to this project until the aforementioned approved plans and construc- tion shall have been completed. 10. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contemplated by this approval, the applicant shall first obtain permits and/or clearance from the following agencies: County Department of Public Health Palm Desert Design Review Board Process Coachella Valley County Water District Regional Water Quality Control Board #7 11. Plans and specifications shall conform to the City of Palm Desert standard specifications, development procedures and design criteria. Any modifications, thereof, shall require approval of the City Engineer. 1T) PLANNING COWMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CASE NO. DP 11-77 Page Three II. SPECIAL CONDITIONS A. General 1. Approval is hereby limited to 168 hotel units, 62 con- dominium units and 8 single family lots. 2. The proposed development shall have a master trash dis- posal agreement acceptable to the Palm Desert Disposal Company. If said agreement includes trash enclosures, said enclosures shall be to -City Standards and subject to review by the DRB as a part of the construction draw- ings. PLANNING COMIISSION RESOLUTION NO. CASE NO. DP 11-77 Page Four II. SPECIAL CONDITIONS (Cont.) B. Hotel Facilities (Exhibit A) 1. If the proposed hotel units are to be sold to separate individuals, the applicant shall provide, as a part of the tentative tract application, proposed covenents, con- ditions and restriction a limitation of a maximum of thirty (30) consecutive days of occupancy by the owner and/ or leaser of any dwelling unit. 2. The proposed landscape area adjacent to the proposed exten- tion of the frontage road shall be incrased to a minimum of 20 feet in width. 3. A 6 ft. high decorative block wall shall be provided on the east, south and west boundary lines of the proposed hotel complex-. Said wall shall be extended along the north bound- ary of the project setbacks 15 feet from the proposed property line with the following exceptions: a. at approved entrances, said wall shall be reduced to a maximum height of three feet or held back a sufficient distance to guarantee adequate sight distance. 4. The proposed tennis courts shall be recessed a minimum of three feet and shall not be lighted except under the follow- ing limitations: a. any proposed lighting system shall be subject to the approval of the DRB as a part of review of the construc- tion drawings. b. the landscape treatment around the proposed tennis courts shall consist of tall trees to reduce side glare. 5. The proposed east=west driveways adjacent to the north bound- ary of the project shall be limited to 20 feet in width. 6. The proposed parking shall be increased to a total of 219 spaces by making the changes to the proposed plot plan. a. move the eight unit portion of the two southerly most, east -west oriented building fifteen feet to the north and add six spaces to the parking byas at the rear of said buildings. b. add two spaces at each end of the parking area on the southerly boundary of the complex. C. add a total of four spaces to the parking bays located on the entrance driveway to the complex. d. add one space to the parking areas located in the north- east and northwest corners of the project. e. the proposed entrance street shall be widened to 32 ft. adjacent to the tennis courts to provide for parallel parking adjacent to the courts. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CASE NO. DP 11-77 Page Five II. SPECIAL CONDITIONS (Copt.) C. Condominium Complex (Exhibit B) 1. A 6 foot high decorative block wall shall be provided in the following areas: a. along the boundary line between the proposed condominium area and the single family lots along Candlewood. b. east property line where a wall does not presently exist. C. west property line, except in the area of the proposed public street connection of Driftwood Drive and Shadow Hills Road said wall shall be set in five feet from the proposed right-of-way line and shall be setback 15 feet from the proposed main entrance to the proposed complex. 2. The major circular private street shall be increased to 32 feet in width to provide for parking on one side and the proposed 12 guest spaces at the entrance to the complex shall be deleted. 3. The proposed tennis courts shall conform to the requirements of Condition II B(4) above. PLANNING COMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CASE NO. DP 11-77 Page Six II. SPECIAL CONDITIONS (Copt.) D. D'esign Review Conditions (Case No. 92MF) 1. The proposed roof line for the Hotel buildings shall be restudied to better tie it into the design of the building. 2. Diffirent material should be utilized for the fencing adjacent to the patio areas.for the hotel units. 3. Applicant shall consider the use of stamped concrete in the driving court areas in the condominium portion of the project. iu CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL DP 11-77 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. I. STANDARD CONDITIONS Page Two 1. The development of this project shall conform substantially to all plans submitted in behalf of this case (Exhibits A-G), and as revised according to the Design Review Board rpocess and/or Planning Commission Action. Any minor changes require approval by the Director of Environmental Services. Any substantial change requires approval by the Planning Commission. 2. All requirements of any law, ordinance, or regulation of the State, City, and any other applicable government entity shall be complied with as part of the development process.- 3. This approval is applicable, subject to the development of this project, commencing within one year from approval date and being promptly completed. 4. Any roof mounted, exhause, or air conditioning equipment shall be fully concealed from view from any public rights -of -way and adjoining properties by architecturally integrated means. 5. Construction plans shall be submitted for approval to the City Fire Marshal prior to issuance of building permits. All condi- tions shall be made a part of construction and no certificate of occupancy shall be issued until completed. Note Fire Marshal's letter dated October 19, 1977 attached hereto for requirements. 6. All utility service and distribution lines on or abutting the subject property, shall be placed undergound prior to occupancy clearance. 7. Traffic control provisions shall be provided as required by the City Engineer. 8. Curb, gutter, sidewalk or approved pathways, and tie-in paving shall be provided in conformance with City Standards and/or as required by the City Engineer. 9. A landscaping, grading, lighting, amenities, trash storage, walk- way layout, and irrigation plan shall be submitted through the Design Review Board. No final inspection or occupancy permit shall be given by the Department of Environmental Services to this project until the aforementioned approved plans and construc- tion shall have been completed. 10. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contemplated by this approval, the applicant shall first obtain permits and/or clearance from the following agencies: County Department of Public Health Palm Desert Design Review Board Process Coachella Valley County water District Regional water Quality Control Board #7 11. Plans and specifications shall conform to the City of Palm Desert standard specifications, development procedures and design criteria. Any modifications, thereof, shall require approval of the City Engineer. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CASE NO. DP 11-77 Page Three II. SPECIAL CONDITIONS A. General 1. Approval is hereby limited to 168 hotel units, 62 con- dominium units and 8 single family lots. 2. The proposed development shall have a master trash dis- posal agreement acceptable to the Palm Desert Disposal Company. If said agreement includes trash enclosures, said enclosures shall be to City Standards and subject to review by the DRB as a part of the construction draw- ings. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CASE NO. DP 11-77 Page Four II. SPECIAL CONDITIONS (Cont.) B. Hotel Facilities (Exhibit A) 1. If the proposed hotel units are to be sold to separate individuals, the applicant shall provide, as a part of the tentative tract application, proposed covenents, con- ditions and restriction a limitation of a maximum of thirty (30) consecutive days of occupancy by the owner and/ or leaser of any dwelling unit. 2. The proposed landscape area adjacent to the proposed exten- tion of the frontage road shall be incrased to a minimum of 20 feet in width. 3. A 6 ft. high decorative block wall shall be provided on the east, south and west boundary lines of the proposed hotel complex. Said wall shall be extended along the north bound- ary of the project setbacks 15 feet from the proposed property line with the following exceptions: a. at approved entrances, said wall shall be reduced to a maximum height of three feet or held back a sufficient distance to guarantee adequate sight distance. 4. The proposed tennis courts shall be recessed a minimum of three feet and shall not be lighted except under the follow- ing limitations: a. any proposed lighting system shall be subject to the approval of the DRB as a part of review of the construc- tion drawings. b. the landscape treatment around the proposed tennis courts shall consist of tall trees to reduce side glare. 5. The proposed east=west driveways adjacent to the north bound- ary of the project shall be limited to 20 feet in width. 6. The proposed parking shall be increased to a total of 219 spaces by making the changes to the proposed plot plan. a. move the eight unit portion of the two southerly most, east -west oriented building fifteen feet to the north and add six spaces to the parking byas at the rear of said buildings. b. add two spaces at each end of the parking area on the southerly boundary of the complex. C. add a total of four spaces to the parking bays located on the entrance driveway to the complex. d. add one space to the parking areas located in the north- east and northwest corners of the project. e. the proposed entrance street shall be widened to 32 ft. adjacent to the tennis courts to provide for parallel parking adjacent to the courts. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CASE NO. DP 11-77 Page Five II. SPECIAL CONDITIONS (Cont.) C. Condominium Complex (Exhibit B) 1. A 6 foot high decorative block wall shall be provided in the following areas: a. along the boundary line between the proposed condominium area and the single family lots along Candlewood. b. east property line where a wall does not presently exist. C. west property line, except in the area of the proposed public street connection of Driftwood Drive and Shadow Hills Road said wall shall be set in five feet from the proposed right-of-way line and shall be setback 15 feet from the proposed main entrance to the proposed complex. 2. The major circular private street shall be increased to 32 feet in width to provide for parking on one side and the proposed 12 guest spaces at the entrance to the complex shall be deleted. 3. The proposed tennis courts shall conform to the requirements of Condition II B(4) above. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CASE NO. DP 11-77 Page Six II. SPECIAL CONDITIONS (Cont.) D. Design Review Conditions (Case No. 92MF) 1. The proposed roof line for the Hotel buildings shall be restudied to better tie it into the design of the building. 2. Diffirent material should be utilized for the fencing adjacent to the patio areas for the hotel units. 3. Applicant shall consider the use of stamped concrete in the driving court areas in the condominium portion of the project. CUfLa�� o:T 11P�I1nua 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE Nov. 2, 1977 APPLICANT Affiliated Construction Co. 77-900 Avenue of the States Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 CASE NO.: 92MF The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of Nov. 1. 1977 CONTINUED TO DENIED xx APPROVED BY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 299 PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF FOR CONCURRENCE WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION. PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF FOR PUBLIC HEARING. Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Environmental Services, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. PAUL A. WILLIAMS, SECRETARY PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSSION cc: Applicant C.V.C.W.D. File PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 299 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, ANNOUNCING FIND- INGS AND APPROVING THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTIONS OF OCTOBER 25, 1977. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did review the Design Review Board actions of October 11, 1977, approving: Case No. 88MF - Request for approval of preliminary site, floor and elevations for a duplex for VICTOR JENNINGS; Case No. 89MF - Request for approval of preliminary site, floor and elevations for a duplex for JOSEPH MUTASCIO; Case No. 90MF - Request for approval of preliminary site, floor and elevations for a duplex for JOSEPH MUTASCIO; Case No. 32MF - Request for approval of a final land- scaping plan for a 13-unit apartment com- plex for JOSEPH MUTASCIO; Case No. 92MF - Request for approval of preliminary site, floor and elevations for a hotel -condominium project for AFFILIATED CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.; Case No. 91MF - Request for approval of preliminary site, floor and elevations for a 20 con- dominium units for C. G. DUNHAM; Case No. 50C - Request for approval of final construction drawings for a commercial building for DR. CRAINE; Case No. 61C - Request for approval of preliminary site, floor and elevations for an addition to a Commercial Structure for BERNARD LEUNG; WHEREAS, at this time, upon considering and receiving all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said Commission did find sufficient facts and reasons to exist to approve the Design Review Board actions of October 25, 1977. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the Commission in this case. 2. That it does hereby approve the Design Review Board actions of October 25, 1977 except that the final landscaping plan for Case No. 77MF is not approved. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 1st day of November, 1977, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: BERKEY, KELLY, KRYDER, SNYDER NOES: NONE ABSENT: READING ABSTAIN: NONE GEORGE BERKEY, Chairman ATTEST: PAUL A. WILLIAMS, Secretary 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION REPORT Date: Oct. 26, 1977 REPORT ON: Hotel - Condominium Project CASE NO.: 92MF ZONE: PC (4), S.P. and PR-7 LOCATION: South side of Highway 111, west of City of Palm Desert City Limits APPLICANT: AFFILIATED CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. NATURE OF APPROVAL SOUGIIT: Preliminary site, floor and elevations DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION: After reviewing the submitted plans and the presentations by the staff and by the applicant, the DRB APPROVED this project, subject to the attached con itions. Date of Action: Oct. 25, 1977 Motion Made By: Williams Seconded By! -Jacks-on Vote: Reasons for Ne atiye Vote (s): An appeal o the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision.) STAFF COMMENTS: Placed on Planning Commission agenda for the meeting of November 1, 1977. n Minutes Palm Desert Planning Commission November 1, 1977 Page Eight IX. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ITEMS (Cont.) Commissioner Kryder asked if there would be any air condition- ing on the roofs. Mr. Gibbs stated there would be none. Mr. Williams stated that 42nd Avenue would be extended. Mr. Cipriani stated that the project will be done in stages. Mr. Beebe indicated that a change was needed in condition 7, it should read as follows: "Lighting of parking areas and premises shall be provided as approved by the Director of Environmental Services. Street lights shall be installed as approved by the City Engineer." Some discussion followed over this condition. Mr. Beebe noted that street lights would be needed at Cook and 42nd. It was moved by Commissioner Kelly, seconded by Commissioner Kryder to approve the Design Review Board Actions of October 11, 1977 with the addition to Condition No. 7 to read as follows: "Lighting of parking areas and premises shall be provided as approved by the Director of Environmental Services. Street lights shall be installed as approved by the City Engineer" by Planning Commission Resolution No. 299; carried unanimously (4-0). A. Review of cases acted on by the Design Review Board at their meeting of October 25, 1977. Mr. Cipriani reviewed the cases starting with Case No. 88MF and Mr. Williams noted that the Design Review Board wants a cluster of trees at the driveway and similar treatment at the end of the building. Mr. Jennings the applicant was present. Regarding Case No. 89MF and 90MF there was some discussion on the driveways and the garages. In reference in Case No. 32MF Mr. Williams noted that the Design Review r equests 32 trees in front. Mr. Williams also noted that Case N 92M1F ad been reviewed with DP 11-77A earlier in the meeting. Mr. Wil hen reviewed Case No. 91MF and covered the various con- cerns oiams Design Review Board as stated in their minutes. Mr. Cipriani reviewed Case No. 50C and there was some discussion on the enclosure area. He then reviewed Case No. 61C. Mr. Bernie Leung was present. It was moved by Commissioner Snyder and seconded by Commissioner Kelly to approve the actions of the Design Review Board on October 25, 1977 by Planning Commission Resolution No. 299; carried unanimously (4-0). X. DISCUSSION ITEMS - None XI. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS - None XII. COMMENTS A. City Staff - Mr. Cipriani noted that the Mayor has requested that a member of the Commission serve on the CVAG Housing and Community Development Subcommittee. Commissioner Kryder volunteered to serve. Mr. Williams stated that the first COD Area Specific Plan neighborhood meeting would be on Nov. 2nd, the 2nd on the 3rd, the 3rd on the 7th which they expect to have a big turn out at this meeting, the 4th meeting on the 8th and the final meeting on the 9th. He stated that he hoped a Commissioner would be able to attend some of the meetings. — N_ BP( MRE ***DESIGN REVIEW BOARD*** DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION 0 mm I Mailing State REQUEST: (Describe specific Nature of approval 00110170TV n;:cr PIPTI(11V! ASSESSOR IS PARCEL NO. - JS . 0212' EXISTING ZONING( Z d c2Z ZfC Telephone Property Owner Authorization THE UNDERSIGNED STATES THAT THEY ARE THE OWNER (S) OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN AND HEREBY GIVE AUTHOR- IZATIOP 9R THE FILING OF THIS APPLICATION. SIGNATURE DATE AGREEMENT ABSOLVING THE CITY OF SERT OF ALL LIABILITIES RELATIVE TO ANY DEED RESTRICTIONS. 1 00 BY MY SIGNATURP ON TH AGREEMENT, ABSOLVE THE CITY OF PALM DESERT OF ALL LIABILITIES REGARDING ANY DEED RES- TRICTIONS THAT MAY BE APPLICABLE TO THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN. SIGNATURE DATE Applicants Signature (FOR STAFF USE ONLY ENVIRONMENTAL ❑ MINISTERIAL ACT \ CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION ❑ NEGATIVE DECLARATION 0 OTHER SIGNATURE o/ 7 ATE ACCEPTED BY��, E.A. No. CASE NO. q<;I' �p ti REFERENCE CASE N0. CITY OF PALM DESERT APPLICATION FORM DESIGN REVIEW BOARD PROCESS Design Review of: CASE NO. Agreement of compliance to be signed by those applying for review. I hereby acknowledge that I have read and agree, to comply with all the following requirements, and understand that the Department of Building and Safety will not issue a building permit or allow occupancy on the use permitted until this signed confirmation has been received by the Department of Environmental Services. The development of this project shall conform substantially to all development plans submitted in behalf of this case, and as revised according to the Design Review Board process. Any minor change requires approval by the Director of Envi- ronmental Services. Any substantial change requires ap- proval by the Design Review Board. All requirements of any law, ordinance, or regulation of the State, City, and any other applicable government entity shall be complied with as part of the development process. This approval is applicable, subject to the development of this project, commencing within one year from approval date and being promptly completed. Landscaping (with irrigation system) shall be installed prior to final inspection and receiving certificate of occupancy. Curb, gutter, curb cuts, and tie-in paving shall be provided along the full frontage of the lot by means of installation prior to final inspection or other provisions as approved by the City Engineer. Construction shall conform to City Stan- dards and all requirements of the City Engineer. L ��J/j- nature) (Date) Department of Environmental Services Form 1 i i i 1 H 0 v 9 1 hd r-- wLJ r ►-- w .� zOy CL c, 1) It it Ali V 3 u- tL LL iL U_ >L u (s Q' tS St ft i Ln c(t to 0 d CO Q t— �- � 11 it SI tl ti itCIS tV t�iS 0 ul ? d d 13 b >�, C� U_ v� usCLI e� uJ I z z Z r- w 1 I\� a �- n Q ju u S z 0�20z00 tv-�0U`� 4 ►U_ ad Lzzz j LU o C 0 a D z K CL CL _ in iti z ,► CZ CZ Q r IL `"' ,t W � o fl X al fie -I OL ti ( Of LLI Z t1J L , Q Z� ` d a 0U`z 0 t) ul K1 xv � l 13 (P L j�- N I X d tt �'' , ul in_ N Y 01 U3 „ Q (� �? I rfl Z aC Q 4 tL Q L- r� cz IU CL 0 o 0 - -- i I0O1ro)fi iit 0 L Z � Z L' U Z tf N CL CL MID Er! G_ LJL N _ Y