HomeMy WebLinkAbout93MF WILLARD T JORDAN�ONSt/'J
'ON
IISIHX3
S301AM39
IVIN3RRioUlAN3
Jo
1N3 UNW30
Im3s3a weed
Jo AID
NM0Y9 4No-4X0 _ t4r.VJ.6 7rJWA70
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
CASE NO.:
APPLICANT:
LOCATION:
ZONING:
93MF
DATE: June 20, 1978
WILLARD T. JORDAN
East side of Highway 74, north of Verba Santa
R-3 18,000(3), S.P.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the final construction drawings.
SPECIAL CONDITIONS
CASE NO. 93MF
1. Construction plans shall be submitted for approval to the City
Fire Marshal prior to issuance of building permits. All con-
ditions shall be made a part of construction and no certificate
of occupancy shall be issued until completed.
2. Any/all utility service and distribution lines on or abutting
the subject property, shall be placed underground prior to oc-
cupancy clearance.
3. Final construction drawings including a final landscaping, grading,
lighting, amenities, trash storage, -walkway layout, and irrigation
plan shall be submitted to the Design Review Board. No final
inspection or occupancy permit shall be given by the Department of
Environmental Services to this project until the aforementioned
approved plans and construction shall have been completed.
4. Applicant shall furnish evidence of property owners' association's
approval of subject plans prior to submittal of final construction
drawings to the DRB.
5. Install or show exists a water system capable of delivering 2500
GPM fire flow for a two (2) hour duration in addition to domestic
or other supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of
20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the
flow is measured along approved vehicular travel ways.
6. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants so that no point of
any building is more than 250 feet from a fire hydrant measured
along approved vehicular travel ways.
a. Hydrants shall not be located closer than 25 feet to any
building.
b. Exterior surfaces of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted
chrome yellow and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green.
a
C. Curbs if installed shall be � ( ) painted red 15 feet in either di-
rection from each hydrant.
7.; Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall furnish
the original and three (3) copies of the water system plan to the
Fire Marshal for review. Upon approval, one copy will be sent to
the Building Department, and the original will be returned to the
developer.
8. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer
and approved by the water company, with the following certification:
"I certify that the design of the water system in Case No.93AIF is
in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Fire Marshal."
L
AGREEMENT
I accept and agree, prior to use of this permit or approval, to comply
with all the conditions set forth, and understand the Deparmtnet of
Building and Safety will not issue a building permit or allow occupancy on
the use permitted until this signed confirmation has been received by
the Department of Environmental Services.
(Date) (Applicant's Signature)
rwr �a� v or.... +�".. .... .. .3 ni '? -. ,..v A � •... .c.. mac... ..f .. _ ..... � - . 9
45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260
TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611
REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
DATE November 17, 1977
APPLICANT STEVE A. WHITTINGTON
1500 ADAMS AVE. Ste. 301
COSTA MESA, CA. 92626
CASE NO.: 93MF
The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request
and taken the following action at its meeting of
November 16. 1977
CONTINUED TO
DENIED
XX APPROVED BY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 301
PLACED ON TI1E AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
CONCURRENCE WITH THE PLANNING
COMMISSION DECISION.
PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
FOR PUBLIC HEARING.
Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Environmental
Services, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision.
PAUL A. WILLIAMS, SECRETARY
PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSSION
cc: Applicant
C.V.C.W.D.
File
SPECIAL CONDITIONS
CASE NO. 93MF
1. Construction plans shall be submitted for approval to the City
Fire Marshal prior to issuance of building permits. All con-
ditions shall be made a part of construction and no certificate
of occupancy shall be issued until completed.
2. Any/all utility service and distribution lines on or abutting
the subject property, shall be placed underground prior to oc-
cupancy clearance.
3. Final construction drawings including a final landscaping, grading,
lighting, amenities, trash storage, walkway layout, and irrigation
plan shall be submitted to the Design Review Board. No final
inspection or occupancy permit shall be given by the Department of
Environmental Services to this project until the aforementioned
approved plans and construction shall have been completed.
4. Applicant shall furnish evidence of property owners' association's
approval of subject plans prior to submittal of final construction
drawings to the DRB.
5. Install or show exists a water system capable of delivering 2500
GPM fire flow for a two (2) hour duration in addition to domestic
or other supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of
20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the
flow is measured along approved vehicular travel ways.
6. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants so that no point of
any building is more than 250 feet from a fire hydrant measured
along approved vehicular travel ways.
a. Hydrants shall not be located closer than 25 feet to any
building.
b. Exterior surfaces of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted
chrome yellow and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green.
c. Curbs (if installed) shall be painted red 15 feet in either di-
rection from each hydrant.
7. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall furnish
the original and three (3) copies of the water system plan to the
Fire Marshal for review. Upon approval, one copy will be sent to
the Building Department, and the original will be returned to the
developer.
8. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer
and approved by the water company, with the following certification:
"I certify that the design of the water system in Case No.93MF is
in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Fire Marshal."
AGREEMENT
I accept and agree, prior to use of this permit or approval, to comply
with all the conditions set forth, and understand the Departtnet of
Building and Safety will not issue a building permit or allow occupancy on
the use permitted until this signed confirmation has been received by
the Department of Environmental Services.
(Date) (Applicant's Signature)
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. _aU
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, ANNOUNCING FINDINGS AND
APPROVING THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTIONS OF NOVEMBER
8, 1977.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert,
California, did review the Design Review Board actions of November 8,
1977, approving:
Case No. 127SA - Request for approval of a sign program for a
commercial structure for JOHN HOOTEN;
Case No. 62C - Request for approval of preliminary site,
floor and elevations for a commercial struc-
ture for MR. & MRS. ROGER FULLER;
Case No. 64C - Request for approval of a roof modification
for a commercial structure for ARCHITECTURAL
ENGINEERING PRODUCTS CO. FOR POMONA FIRST
FEDERAL;
Case No. 65C - Request for approval of preliminary site, floor
and elevations for a commercial complex for
C.G. DUNHAM;
Case No. 66C
Case No. 74MF
- Request for approval
and elevations for a
JACK MACKEY;
Case No. 93MF -
Request for approval
and elevations for a
MAN, INC.;
of preliminary site, floor
commercial complex for
of preliminary site, floor
duplex for DILLMAN & DILL -
Request for approval of preliminary site, floor
and elevations for a condominium project for
STEVE A. WHITTINGTON;
Case No. 96MF - Request for approval of preliminary site, floor
and elevations for a condominium project for
CHARLES ROOT;
Case No. 97MF - Request for approval of preliminary site, floor
and elevations for 6 single-family residences
for W & R DEVELOPERS;
WHEREAS, at this time, upon considering and receiving all testimony
and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said
Commission did find sufficient facts and reasons to exist to approve the
Design Review Board actions of November 8, 1977, except Case 62C continued
to November 29, 1977 and two Special Conditions are hereby attached to
Case No. 127SA.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the
City of Palm Desert Planning Commission held on this 16th day of November,
1977, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: BERKEY, KELLY, KRYDER
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: READING, SNYDER
ABSTAIN: NONE
GEORGE BERKEY, Chairman
ATTEST:
PAUL A. WILLIAMS, Secretary
/ks
1'tf1TF o:ff
45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260
TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION REPORT
Date: June 22, 1978
REPORT ON: 4 Condominium units
CASE NO.: 93MF ZONE: R-3, 18,000(3), S.P.
LOCATION: East side of Highway 74, north of Verba Santa
APPLICANT: WILLARD T. JORDAN
NATURE OF APPROVAL SOUGHT: Final Construction Drawings
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION:
After reviewing the submitted plans and the presentations by
the staff and by the applicant, the DRB APPROVED
this project, subject to the attached conditions.
Date of Action
Motion Made By
Seconded By:
Vote:
June 20 1978
Jackson
Cipriani
5-0
Reasons for Negative Vote (s):
(An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk
of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen (Z5) days of the date of the
decision.)
STAFF COMMENTS:
November 7, 1977
Paul Williams
Director of Environmental Services
City of Palm Desert
Reference: Case No. 93MF
Gentlemen:
Prior to construction of any of the proposed buildings, the following con-
ditions must be met:
1. Install or show exists a water system capable of delivering 2500
GPM fire flow for a two (2) hour duration in addition to domestic or
other supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi
residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is
measured along approved vehicular travel ways.
2. Install Riverside County 25sdper fire hydrants so that no point of any
building is more than feet from a fire hydrant measured along
approved vehicular travel ways.
A. Hydrants shall not be located closer than 25 feet to any
building.
B. Exterior surfaces of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted
chrome yellow and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green.
C. Curbs (if installed) shall be painted red 15 feet in either
direction from each hydrant.
3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall furnish the
original and three (3) copies of the water system plan to the Fire
Marshal for review. Upon approval, one copy will be sent to the Build-
ing Department, and the original will be returned to the developer.
4. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and
approved by the water company, with the following certificati$F "I
certify that the design of the water system in Case Number is
in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Fire Marshal."—
Very truly yours,
David L. Flake
Fire Chief
Bud Engel
Fire Marshal
45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260
TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION REPORT
Date: Nov. 9, 1977
REPORT ON: 4 Condominium Units
CASE NO.: 93MF ZONE: R-3, 18,000(3), S.P.
LOCATION: East side of Highway 74, north of Verba Santa
APPLICANT: STEVE A. WHITTINGTON
NATURE OF APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary site, floor and elevations
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION:
After reviewing the submitted plans and the presentations by
the staff and by the applicant, the DRB APPROVED
this project, subject to the attached conditions.
Date of Action: Nov. 8, 1977
Motion Made By: Jackson
Seconded By: Urrutia
Vote: 5-0
Reasons for Ne ative Vote (s):
An appeal o the above action may be made in writing to the
City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen (15) days
of the date of the decision.)
STAFF COMMENTS: Placed on Planning Commission agenda of Nov. 16, 1977
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
CASE NO.: 93MF
APPLICANT: STEVE A. WHITTINGTON
DATE: Nov. 8, 1977
LOCATION: East side of Highway 74, north of Verba Santa
ZONING: R-3 18,000(3), S.P.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff is recommending approval of the preliminary site,
floor and elevations.
Minutes
Palm Desert Design Review Board
November 8, 1977
8. Case No. 74MF (Cont.)
Page Three
Discussion followed as to the lowering of the garages which would tie them in
better with the rest of the structure which became Condition No. 14 and that
the parking structures should be covered which became Condition No. 15 and
that olive trees should be utilized in thelandscape plan, which became Con-
dition No. 16.
It was moved by Mr. Urrutia and seconded by Mr. Leung to approve the project
subject to the conditions; motion carried 5-0 (Leung, Urrutia, Johnson, Jack-
son, Minturn).
9. Case No. 93MF - STEVE A. WITTINGTON - Preliminary site, floor and elevations
for 4 condominium units located on the east side of Highway 74, north of Verba
Santa. Willard Jordan, representing applicant,present.
Mr. Jordan stated that the carports will be garages.
Some discussion followed regarding the setback from curb to building, the
color of the building and treatment of same, it was noted that there will be
stucco and wood with a slump block chimney and fireplace. Mr. Johnson noted
that more landscaping would soften the building.
Mr. Jordan asked about the fire line condition and if turf block was allowable
in the open parking spaces. Mr. Cipriani stated that the Fire Marshal was
the one that gave the condition. The Board stated that turf block was fine.
It was moved by Mrs. Jackson and seconded by Mr. Urrutia to approve the pro-
ject subject to the conditions; motion carried 5-0 (Leung, Urrutia, Johnson,
Jackson, Minturn).
10. Case No. 94MF - E.G. & J. K. SILVERTON - Final construction drawings for a dup-
lex on the west side of Portola, south of Shadow Mountain Drive. E. G. & J. K.
Silverton present.
Mr. Cipriani noted that the plans had been submitted before bu - the ap-
plicant had been given misinformation and had to have the pla, ne and is
now submitting both the preliminary and final drawings. '
There was some discussion with regard to the driving and park;_ raas. Mr.
Minturn indicated that the carports should be made into garages and Mr. John-
son suggested more landscaping with bigger trees. Some discussion followed
regarding the wall. Mr. Leung suggested block or plaster, the applicant agreed.
The Board requested that the landscape plan come before the Board.
It was moved by Mr. Leung and seconded by Mr. Minturn to approve the project
with the subject conditions; motion carried 4-0 (Leung, Urrutia, Johnson,
Minturn).
11. Case No. 96MF - CHARLES ROOT - Preliminary site, floor and elevations for a
9 condominium units on the west side of Verba Santa, south of Pitahaya. Appli-
cant not present.
Mr. Cipriani noted that this had been reviewed at the very preliminary stages
and that the Boards comments had been incorporated into the conditions.
It was moved by Mr. Urrutia and seconded by Mr. Minturn to approve the project
with the subject conditions; motion carried 4-0 (Leung, Urrutia, Johnson,
Minturn).
12. Case No. 97MF - W & R DEVELOPERS - Preliminary site, floor and elevations for
b single-family residences in the Desert Paradise Tract, on Joshua between 44th
and Parkview. Applicant present.
Mr. Leung told the applicant that composition shingles do not stand up to the
wind and sand in the desert and he recommended that the applicant consider tile
or rock. He also noted that the plant-ons around the windows should go all the
way around the window and should be plaster.
n( MR9 ***DESIGN REVIEW BOARD***
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
PLANNING DIVISION
S-f - \
Applicant 1 please
1*00
Mailing Address
< o157
City
REQUEST: (Describe specific nature of approval requested)
m; ` x o aT
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
54b-14.l,,87
Telephone
up-coae
• ! tfj i � ✓r � •i/ r
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. & 2 B - Oed - OOS
EXISTING ZONING K• O IbtQ00�71 7.T!
Property Owner Autnarization THE UNDERSIGNED STATES THAT THEY ARE THE OWNER (S) OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN AND HEREBY GIVE AUTHOR-
IZATION FOR THE FILING OF THIS/APPLICATION. _
—� SIGNATIURE ATE
AGREEMENT ABSOLVING THE CITY OF PALM DESERT OF All LIABILITIES RELATIVE TO ANY DEED RESTRICTIONS.
1 DO BY MY SIGNATURE ON THIS AGREEMENT, ABSOLVE THE CITY OF PALM DESERT OF ALL LIABILITIES REGARDING ANY DEED RES-
_ _ TRIC IONS THAT MAY BE APPLICABLE TO THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN.
/y
Lf
47
SIGN URE / DATE
Applicants Signature X ,i �, � +�+..E 6tt d
Z�l IV
I
SIGNATUR ( d DATE
1
(FOR STAFF USE ONLY) ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS TACEPTED BY
❑ MINISTERIAL ACT E.A. No.
❑ CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION - ACE n 0. 93 47F❑ NEGATIVE DECLARATIONr-Iv, vOTHER FERENCE CASE NO.
The Design Review Board process is the method by which the City of Palm Desert
reviews detailed design and construction plans prior to the issuance of a building
permit.
APPLICA
DEPARTMENT DESIGN
OF ENVIRON- REVIEW
MENTAL BOARD
SERVICES (ADVISORY)
STAFF
TEN
PLANNING
COMMISSION
(APPROVES OR
DENIES PROJECT)
INTERIOR REMODELS, MINOR ELECTRICAL, MECHANICAL, OR PLUMBING PERMITS
STAFF USE ONLY:
El
DEPARTMENT
BUILDING AND CONSTRUCT
SAFETY ION
Date Received
Date of
ACTOR hleeting
ACTION
APPLICANT NOTIFIED
Staff
ORB
P.C.
C.C.
Department of Environmental Services Form 1
CITY OF PALM DESERT
APPLICATION FORM
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD PROCESS
Design Review of:
CASE NO.
Agreement of compliance to be signed by those applying for review.
I hereby acknowledge that I have read and agree, to comply
with all the following requirements, and understand that
the Department of Building and Safety will not issue a
building permit or allow occupancy on the use permitted
until this signed confirmation has been received by the
Department of Environmental Services.
The development of this project shall conform substantially
to all development plans submitted in behalf of this case,
and as revised according to the Design Review Board process.
Any minor change requires approval by the Director of Envi-
ronmental Services. Any substantial change requires ap-
proval by the Design Review Board.
All requirements of any law, ordinance, or regulation of
the State, City, and any other applicable government entity
shall be complied with as part of the development process.
This approval is applicable, subject to the development of
this project, commencing within one year from approval date
and being promptly completed.
Landscaping (with irrigation system) shall be installed
prior to final inspection and receiving certificate of
occupancy.
Curb, gutter, curb cuts, and tie-in paving shall be provided
along the full frontage of the lot by means of installation
prior to final inspection or other provisions as approved by
the City Engineer. Construction shall conform to City Stan-
dards and all requirements of the City Engineer.
rT t.
(Signatur ) D to
Department of Environmental Services Form 1
7
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD PROCESS
SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
NOTE: NO APPLICATION SHALL BE PROCESSED UNTIL STAFF HAS DETERMINED THAT THE
APPLICATION PACKAGE IS COMPLETE.
An "APPLICATION PACKAGE" shall contain:
- The completed Application Form.
- The appropriate fee as required by the attached Fee Schedule.
- Photographs of the site and adjacent properties, particularly
adjacent buildings. (At the request of the Staff)
- Three (3) complete sets of plans for staff reviewed cases and/or addi-
tional five (5) site plans for all projects which go to the Planning
Commission.
The "PLANS" shall consist of the following:
I. General Information Block (to include:)
A. Owner's name, address, and phone number
B. Designer's name, address, and phone number
C. Any special information or conditions pertaining to the site or to
the plans
II. Vicinity Map (no scale)
A. Major street names
B. Other reference points and landmarks
III. Site Anal sis & PreliminaryDrainage and Grading(to scale)
to include:
A. North arrow
B. Scale
C. General drainage pattern of area to include site and adjacent properties
within 100' (use arrows to show drainage flow to and from site).
D. Existing contour lines including property corners
E. Proposed locations of structures and drives
F. Elevations of pads and finished floors
G. Finished grades
H. Elevations of existing street centerline
I. Retaining walls (where applicable)
J. Perimeter walls and fences which affect drainage
19
Plot Plan (to scale & sufficient size to include:)
A. Scale
B. North arrow
C. Property lines
D. Lot dimensions
E. Public rights -of -way with existing and proposed
dimensions (include street names)
F. Existing or proposed curb lines
G. Any and all easements
H. All utility line locations (gas, electric, cable, water,
and sewer)
I. Adjacent property uses (showing approximate location of
structures and other pertinent features)
J. Major vehicle, bicycle, and pedestrian access points
to and from site (use arrows of different widths to show
direction and intensity of use)
K. Setback areas
L. All existing and proposed structures
M. Interior vehicle, bicycle, and pedestrian circulation
patterns (if applicable)
N. Off-street parking (to include spaces, regulatory
devices, provisions for accessory vehicle storage
where applicable, etc.)
0. Parking areas for bicycles and carts (if applicable)
P. Service areas and facilities to include:
(1) trash storage areas
(2) mail delivery boxes
(3) loading areas
Perimeter fencing and screening
Proposed sign locations (if applicable)
Information Block (if applicable) to include:
A. Acreage and square footage calculations
B. Ratio of structures to total land area
C, Ratio of parking spaces to building square footage
D. Parking requirements provided
E. Ratio of landscaping to total land area
F. Any specific information of special conditions
particularly relevant to the project
VI. Elevations of all Sides of all Structures (to scale and with
dimensions
VII. Elevations of Signs (if applicable)
VIII. Elevations of Fencing, Perimeter Screening and Walled Areas
IX. Description of Materials to be Used and Chart Showing Exact
ais to be us
One set of plans shall show elevations accurately colored to
depict actual appearance of proposed structures or material
board.
X. Floor Plans of all structures (to scale) with dimensions
XI. Landscape, Irrigation, and Exterior Lighting Plan (to include:)
A. Landscaping, showing location of all trees, shrubs, plants,
and ground cover in those areas subject to public view
B. Variety and size of vegetation shall be noted
C, Irrigation provisions for maintaining aforementioned
landscaping
D. Lighting provisions for lighting driveways, entrances,
yards, premises, parking areas, etc.
E. Perimeter treatment of property (fences, wall, vegetation
screens, etc.)
F. Street furniture and ornamentation, if applicable, (to
include:)
(1) rock outercroppings
(2) benches
(3) fountains and waterscapes plot plan
(4) newspaper stands
(5) statues
(6) etc.
uESIGN REVIEW BOARD PROCESS
GENERAL INFORMATION
I. PROCESSING SCHEDULE:
SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES and similar projects require 2-4 working days before they may
be submitted to the Building and Safety Division for plan check.
MULTI -FAMILY, COMMERCIAL, and other projects that must be reviewed by the D.R.B.
and Planning Commission usually require 10-20 days.
In order to facilitate processing, the applicant or a designated representative
should attend the review hearings to answer questions which may arise regarding
the project.
II. MANDATORY FINDINGS:
No project may be approved unless:
The proposed development conforms to any legally adopted development standards.
- The design and location of the proposed development and its relationship to
neighboring, existing or proposed developments and traffic is such that it
will not impair the desirability of investment or occupation in the neighbor-
hood; and that it will not unreasonably interfere with the use and enjoyment
of neighboring, existing or proposed developments, and that it will not create
traffic hazards or congestion.
- The design and location of the proposed development is in keeping with the
character of the surrounding neighborhood and is not detrimental to the har-
monious, orderly, and attractive development contemplated by the Zoning Or-
dinance and the adopted General Plan of the City.
- The design and location of the proposed development would provide a desirable
environment for its occupants, as well as for its neighbors and that it is
aesthetically of good composition, materials, textures and colors.
- The proposed use conforms to all the requirements of the zone in which it is
located and all other applicable requirements.
- The overall development of the land shall be designed to ensure the protection
of the public health, safety, and general welfare.
III. ADOPTED DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS:
Each project will be reviewed on the basis of its conformance to the following
adopted development standards. In those areas determined by the D.R.B. to be
"unacceptable", it is the responsibility of the applicant to redesign that por-
tion of the project.
A• TERRAIN CONTROL STANDARDS UNACCEPTABLE
1. Terrain and soils shall be structurally stable and suitable
for development.
A• TERRAIN CONTROL STANDARDS (continued) UNACCEPTABLE
0
C.
2. (Water Erosion) Property to be developed shall be protected
against drainage runoff from adjacent properties.
3. (Water Erosion) Drainage runoff produced by property and
development therein shall be contained on the property or
allowed to drain onto adjacent public streets or allowed to
drain by other City approved means.
4. (Wind Erosion) Property to be developed shall be protected
against wind carried deposits from adjacent areas.
5. (Wind Erosion) Property to be developed shall, upon com-
pletion, produce no appreciable wind carried deposits on
adjacent properties. Suitable soil stabilization shall be
provided.
6. Curb and gutters shall be provided where required to control
and regulate drainage.
ACCESS & CIRCULATION STANDARDS
Safe & convenient vehicle access to property and development
therein shall be provided.
2. Safe and convenient pedestrian access to property and
development therein shall be provided.
3. Circulation plans (auto, bicycle, and pedestrian) shall
conform to municipally developed circulation plans for
the vicinity and immediate area.
SITE PLANNING STANDARDS
1. Site Planning shall occur in a manner which minimizes obstruc-
tion of scenic views from adjacent properties.
2. Site Planning shall be compatible with existing terrain.
3. Site Planning shall occur in a manner which does not expose
unattractive areas or activities to the detriment of adjacent
properties.
4. Site Planning shall occur in a manner in which asphalt or
concrete is minimized.
5. Avoid unnecessary impediments for handicapped persons.
UNACCEPTABLE
D. UTILITY & EQUIPMENT STANDARDS
1. All service utility lines shall be placed underground.
2. All control panels, vaults and necessary equipment
shall be architecturally screened or landscaped or other-
wise concealed from public view.
3. All air conditioning and ventilation equipment shall be
located and screened in a manner to prevent exposure to
public rights -of -way and adjacent properties.
E• VEHICLE PARKING STANDARDS
I. Off-street parking should be located in proximity to
facilitie(s) it serves.
2. Parking areas should be screened from view wherever possible
by means of berms, garden walls and landscaping.
3. Parking areas shall be shaded where practical.
4• Carports for apartment developments shall not front onto a
public right-of-way.
5. Garages should be encouraged not to front onto a public
right-of-way.
6. All parking areas for recreational and accessory vehicles
and trailers shall be architecturally screened or landscaped
or otherwise concealed from public view.
7. Adequate handicapped parking spaces shall be provided.
F. ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS
1. A singular architectural theme shall be applied to a given
structure or complex. (including facade architecture).
2. Architectural design shall be applied to entire structure or
complex rather than just to those sides exposed to public
view.
3. Architectural design shall be appropriate to the climatic
conditions of the desert area and shall be done in a manner
which minimizes the consumption of energy required for heating
and cooling.
4. Entrances shall include appropriate lighting and identification.
5. Architectural design shall employ materials and colors which
are compatible and complementary to the desert area.
F. ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS (continued)
6. Architectural design shall incorporate provisions for signage
(if applicable) as an integrated part of the overall design.
7. Architecture and landscaping shall be co-ordinated and com-
plementary.
8. All air conditioning, exhaust, and ventilation, accessory
mechanical and electrical equipment and control panels shall
be located and screened in a manner to prevent exposure to
public rights -of -way and adjacent properties.
G. LANDSCAPING STANDARDS
Landscaping shall be an integral part of the site planning
and architectural design on all projects.
2. Provisions for the adequate maintenance and irrigation of
landscaping shall be made through the use of underground
irrigation systems.
3. Landscaping, walls and fences shall not create unsafe conditions
along public rights -of -way.
H. LIGHTING, IDENTIFICATION & SIGNAGE STANDARDS
1. Signage shall be architecturally integrated with the structure
involved.
2. Signage shall be of colors compatible and complementary to
the structure it relates to and to other development in
its surroundings.
3. No lighting of Signage shall exceed an output of 10 candle-
power at 10 feet.
4. Signage for commercial uses shall be for identification pur-
poses only.
I. FENCING, SCREENING & ENCLOSURE STANDARDS
1. Materials and colors of fences and walls shall be compatible
and complementary to the structures with which they relate.
2. Fences, walls, and enclosures shall be handled as an integrated
part of the architecture and landscaping.
3• Outside service and storage areas, where permitted, shall be
enclosed and screened.
UNACCEPTABLE
UNACCEPTABLE
I. FENCING, SCREENING & ENCLOSURE STANDARDS (continued)
4. Fences and walls shall not obstruct line -of -sight along
public rights -of -way.
J. SERUICE AREA STANDARDS
Service areas shall be designed and constructed of materials
and colors which are compatible and complementary to the
structures of complexes they serve.
2. Service areas shall be located in a manner which does not
adversely affect adjacent properties.
3. Service areas shall be screened and/or enclosed to prevent
their exposure to public rights -of -way and adjacent pro-
perties.
CITY OF PALM DESERT
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
PLANNING DIVISION
APPLICANTS' GUIDE TO PROCEDURES
FILING PROCEDURE: Prior to submittal the applicant shall discuss his pro-
posal with the Planning staff to determine whether or not the proposal is
in conformance with the General Plan and to determine zoning ordinance,
subdivision ordinance, or other requirements.
II. GENERAL INFORMATION:
Meetings: 1) City Council meetings are held on the second and fourth
Thursday of each month, at 7:00 PM in the Council Chambers in the City
Hall, 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane. 2) Planning Commission meetings are
held on Tuesday, nine (9) days prior to the first Council meeting of
the month, also at 7:00 PM in the Council Chambers and Wednesday, eight
(8) days prior to the second Council meeting of the month, at 1:00 PM
in the Council Chambers. 3) The Design Review Board convenes on Tues-
day, a week before the Planning Commission, at 5:30 PM in the Council
Chambers.
Public Hearing: Public hearings are held when the City considers re-
quests for a change of zone, variance, conditional use permit, general
plan amendment, etc. Legal notices for these hearings are published
in the Palm Desert Post at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing.
Public hearing items before the Palm Desert Redevelopment Agency are
published in the Desert Sun.
C. Appeals: Where the Zoning Ordinance provides for appeal to the City
Council or Planning Commission, the appeal shall be made within fifteen
(15) days of the date of the decision by filing an application of appeal
with the Director of Environmental Services.
D. Fees: All required fees are listed in the Fee Schedule, as approved by
the City Council.
Building Permits: Building permits are issued by the Department of
Building and Safety and are required before any new construction, re-
construction, plumbing, mechanical work is commenced.
F. Business License: Prior to engaging in an enterprise for profit, zoning
and building code clearance for the proposed use is required and a city
business license obtained. Application should be made to the Code En-
forcement Supervisor.
G. Private Deed Restrictions: Many parcels of land in the City of Palm
Desert are subject to private covenants, conditions, and deed restrictions
which may conflict with the requirements of the City Zoning Ordinance.
The applicant is responsible for resolving conflicts with deed restriction
requirements.
-2-
III. DESCRIPTION OF inE TYPES OF APPLICATIONS AND RE4u1RED FEES:
ACTION REQUESTED GENERAL INFORMATION
PLANNED DISTRICT -PD Provides detailed information on new
DEVELOPMENT PLAN development in the Planned Residential
(PR), Planned Commercial (PC), or Plan -
(Planning Commission and Council ned Indistrial (PI) zones.
Action Required)
Application Fee: PR Zone with C/Z re-
quest $450 + 2 DU - $1,000 Max. No C/Z
request $325 + $2 DU - $1,000 Max; PC or
PI Zone with C/Z request $650 without
C/Z request $550.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT -CUP Where certain uses may create potential
problems, the Palm Desert Municipal Code
(Planning Commission Action Required) provides that conditional use permits
shall be required "so that they may be
located properly with respect to the ob-
jectives of the zoning regulations."
Application Fee: A, RE, R-1, R-2, R-3,
C-1, SI, P & OS zones - one acre or less
$140, one acre plus $250 + $10/acre. D,
S, N, SP, H overlays - same unless base
district requires CUP + 50%.
ADJUSTMENT -ADJ The Palm Desert Municipal Code provides
for an adjustment to the terms of the
(Approval of Zoning Administrator zoning ordinance to allow minor reductions
Required) in yard setbacks or parking requirements.
Application Fee: 530
VARIANCE -VAR
(Planned Commission Action Required)
CHANGE OF ZONE -C/Z
(Planning Commission and Council
Action Required
A variance from the terms of the zoning
ordinance may be obtained only when, be-
cause of special circumstances applicable
to the property, including size, shape,
or topography, the strict application of
the Ordinance deprives such property of
privileges enjoyed by other property in
the vicinity and under identical zoning
classification.
Application Fee: $50 residential lot;
of er.
A change of zone request may be initiated
by the owner or authorized agent of the
owner of property. All zoning designations
must be in conformance to the General Plan
or any specific plan for that area.
Application Fee: $325
-3-
ACTION REQUESTED
GENERAL INFORMATION
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
-GPA
Amendments of these plans are processed in
REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT
-RPA
conformance to State Law and the ordinances
SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT
-SPA
and resolutions of the City of Palm Desert.
(Planning Commission and Council
Application Fee: $500
Action Required. Redevelopment
Agency Action Required)
TEMPORARY USE PERMIT
-TUP
To regulate temporary uses such as art sales,
(Approval of Zoning Administrator
Christmas tree sales, garage sales, subdivi-
sion sales office, and model homes so that
Required)
they will not be detrimental to surrounding
property.
Application Fee: $10
HOME OCCUPATION PERMIT
-HOP
To regulate the use of business activities
in residential neighborhoods.
(Approval of Zoning Administrator
Required)
Application Fee: $0
CERTIFICATE OF USE
-CRT
A use certificate insures that each new or
(Approval of Zoning Administrator
expanded use of a structure or site complies
with all applicable provisions of the Palm
Required)
Desert Municipal Code.
Application Fee: $0
SIGN PERMIT
-S
Regulates the size, color, and location of
(Approval of Planning Disision
signs throughout the City. No sign may be
erected without an approved sign permit.
Staff Required; Design Review
Board/Planning Commission Action
Application Fee: Staff Review - $0-
Required for Large Signs - See
(less than $100 in value)
ORB Process)
$10-($100 - $500 in value)
ORB & PC Review $15
TIME EXTENSION
Where permits or approvals have been granted
(Depending on use, may
for a specific time period, time extensions
require ap-
proval of Zoning Administrator, Plan
may be granted by the appropriate agency or
body.
ning Commission or City Council)
Application Fee: $50, if public hearing is
required.
AMENDMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
PLAN, CUP, VARIANCE, PLOT
PLAT! APPROVAL
(A.pnrovino body varies with nature
of rr,rinst)
Assures flexibility of the City's regulatory
process due to unforeseen problems.
Application Fee: $50, if public hearing is
required.
-4-
ACTION REQUESTED GENERAL INFORMATION
ORB PROCESS -SF Review of landscaping, architecture, colors
-MF and materials, and other zoning requirements
(Requires approval of Planning -C prior to submittal for a building permit.
Division staff or Design Review
Board and Planning Commission) Application Fee: Single family $15
Other $50
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP -PM
(Review by Planning Commission)
FINAL PARCEL MAP
(Approved by City Council)
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP -TR
(Review by Planning Commission and
City Council)
FINAL TRACT MAP
(Approved by City Council)
REVISED TENTATIVE MAP
(Review by Dir. of Environmental
Services, may be reviewed by
Planning Commission)
APPEALS - ALL TYPES -APL
(Appeal agency based upon nature
of project)
INITIAL STUDY OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
(Submit to Planning Division Staff)
To regulate the subdivision of property
involving 4 or less parcels.
Application Fee: $50
Final adoption of plans and performance
bonds on required subdivision improvements.
Application Fee: $100
To regulate the subdivision of property
involving 5 or more parcels.
Application Fee: $250 + $2.50 per lot
Final adoption of plans and performance
bonds on required subdivision improvements.
Application Fee: $100 + $6.00 per lot
To provide for flexibility in the sub-
division process necessitated by unfore-
seen circumstances.
Application Fee: $50 + $2.50 per add. lot
The Palm Desert Municipal Code establishes
the appeal process for various types of
projects to insure maximum consideration
of individual applications.
Application Fee: $50, if public hearing is
required
The California Environmental Quality Act of
1970 requires an assessment of the impacts
of proposed projects which require a dis-
cretionary approval by the City.
Application Fee: $30
-5-
ACTION REQUESTED
EIR REVIEW
(Requires Planning Commission action,
may require City Council action)
OTHER
GENERAL INFORMATION
Detailed environmental
posed impacts resulting
which may have adverse
sequences.
Application Fee: $550
analysis of pro -
from a project
environmental con -