The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About103MF DONALD W BEDELL45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT,CAUFORNIA92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-06I1 November 8, 1978 Donald W. Bedell 514 Sandpiper Palm Desert, CA 92260 Re: Case No. 103MF Dear Mr. Bedell: Your request for a one year extension of the approved design for your property located on San Rafael in Palm Desert, is hereby granted. If you have any further questions, please contact the staff of the Dept. of Environmental Services. y truly yours, Paul A. Williams, AIP Dir. of Environmental Services lm/pw/ks cc: Bedell Associates 1522 K Street, NW Washington, D.C. 20005 Walker & leE: Real EstatF Wit, � i , QG.�W,,aririing / -,S - 71 Palm Desert Office 73-261 Hi0hway 111 Palm Desert, CA 92260 (714) 346-7405 Res: 1714) 568-1203 BEDELL ASSOCIATES Management Counsellors Planning 1522 K STREET, N. W. WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005 (202) 833-1540 November 6, 1979 Donald W. Bedell Mr. Paul A. Williams, Director -%vironmental Services E E C E t V E p City of Palm Desert, California 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane NOV Palm Desert, California 92250 7 ?y ' ENVINUNMLNrAL SERVICES Dear Mr. Williams: CITY OF PALM OUP I hereby request a one year extension of the design ap- proval given property owned jointly by my wife Catherine and me on San Rafael in Palm Desert, Case ,f103MF, dated November 22, 1977. We will appreciate your favorable consideration. Sincerely yours, NI�W' / (I k� jm PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 312 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, ANNOUNCING FINDINGS AND APPROVING THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTIONS OF NOVEMBER 22, 1977. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did review the Design Review Board action of November 22, 1977, approving: Case No. 99MF - Conceptual site, floor and elevations for 780 condominium units and 6 single-family residence lots for a planned residential development for SUNRISE CORPORATION, Et Al; Case No. 100MF - Preliminary site, floor and elevations for a duplex for SANTIAGO FERNANDEZ; Case No. 101MF - Preliminary site, floor and elevations for a 3-unit apartment for LEONA GERTZ; Ca a No. Eis - Preliminary site, floor and elevations for a 10-unit apartment for STEVE FLESHMAN: WHER time, upon considering and receiving all testi- mony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said Commission did find sufficient facts and reasons to exist to approve the Design Review Board actions of November 22, 1977. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and con- stitute the findings of the Commission in this Case. 2. That it does hereby approve the Design Review Board actions of November 22, 1977. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 29th day of November, 1977, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: BERKEY, KELLY, KRYDER, READING, SNYDER NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE GEORGE BERKEY, Chairman ATTEST: PAUL A. WILLIAMS, Secretary /ks Minutes Palm Desert November 29, Planning Commission 1977 IX. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ITEMS (Cont.) Page Six A. Case No. 62C (Cont.) Mr. Williams pointed out that the preliminary Redevelopment site plan showed up to 3 driveways opening onto El Paseo in that block. Mr. Outcault replied that Hunter Cook, the City Engineer, had been opposed to such an opening for this project. It was moved by Commissioner Snyder and seconded by Commis- sioner Kelly to approve the preliminary plans for Case No. 62C sub- ject to the new site plan submittals and the deletion of Condition Nos. 13 and 14, by Planning Commission Resolution No. 311. Some discussion followed and Commissioner Kryder asked for clarification of the access situation, since deletion of Condition No. 14 would leave the Fuller project with only 1 access/egress point. Chairman Berkey noted that the Planning Commission would have other opportuni- ties to obtain mid -block driveways when the other parcels to the east developed. Mr. Leung felt that it would be better to separate cars and pedestrians on E1 Paseo as much as possible. Mr. Cipriani replied that this could present a short-range problem. If the 3rd lot develop- ed without access to Sage Lane, this would create a situation where up to 200 cars would be forced to use a single access. Commissioner Snyder wanted to keep the discussion focused on just the Fuller build- ing and did not think that the motion should be changed. The motion to approve Planning Commission Resolution No. 311 was carried unanimous- ly (5-0). B. Review of Cases acted on by the Design Review Board at their meeting of November 22, 1977. Mr. Cipriani summarized the cases. Their being no concerns expressed by the Commission, it was moved by Commissioner Snyder and seconded i loner Kelly to approve Cases No. 99MF, 100MF, 101MF, 103MF Planning Commission Resolution No. 312; carried unanimo sly X. DISCUSSION A. Reprint from H&H/housing regarding wholesale price indexes for selected building materials and commodities. A brief discussion occurred on the article regarding the recent inflationary increases in the wholesale price index for selected build- ing materials. XI. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS - None XII. COMMENTS A. City Staff Mr. Williams reminded the members of the special Planning Commission meeting on December 6, 1977 for the COD Area Specific Plan. Commissioner Kelly indicated she would be absent for that meeting, but would be present for the regular meeting of Decem- ber 14, 1977. B. City Attorney - Not present ,% 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 REPORT OF PLANNING CON24ISSION ACTION DATE NOV. 30, 1977 APPLICANT Donald Bedell Steve Fleshman 45-775 Ocotillo #11 Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 CASE NO.• 103MF The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of Nov. 29, 1977 CONTINUED TO DENIED XXX APPROVED BY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 312 PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF CONCURRENCE WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION. PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF FOR PUBLIC HEARING. Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Environmental Services, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. - cc: Applicant C.V.C.W,D. PAUL A. WILLIAMS, SECRETARY PALM DESERT PLANNING COMPIISSSION SPECIAL CONDITIONS FOR CASE NO. 10311F 1. Curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb cuts, and tie-in paving shall be provided on San Rafael in conformance with City Standards and the requirements of the City Engineer at the time of construction or by future agreement with the City Engineer. 2. A complete and detailed landscaping and irrigation plan, fencing, lighting, and sign plan shall be submitted to the Design Review Board prior to final approval. 3. Final construction drawings shall be submitted to the City Fire Marshal prior to the submittal of plans for Building Plan Check. 4. Applicant shall submit a written agreement in a form accept- able to the City Attorney to join any undergrounding district involving the subject property. 5. Applicant shall submit a perimeter fencing or wall plan to the DRB for approval as part of the submittal of final con- struction drawings. 6. Rear yard setback shall be a minimum of 20 feet. AGREE`.IE\T I accept and agree, prior to use of this permit or approval, to comply with all the conditions set forth , and understand the Department of Building and Safety will not issue a build- ing permit or allow occupancy on the use permitted until this signed confirmation has been received by the Department of Environmental Services. (Date) - (Applicant's Signature) 40 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION REPORT Date: Nov. 23, 1977 REPORT ON: Apartment Project CASE NO.: 103MF ZONE: R-2 LOCATION: West side of San Rafael, south of Catalina APPLICANT: STEVE FLESHMAN NATURE OF APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary site, floor and elevations DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION: After reviewing the submitted plans and the presentations by the staff and by the applicant, the DRB APPROVED this project, subject to the attached conditions. Date of Action: Nov. 22, 1977 Motion Made By: Seconded By: Jackson Vote: Reasons for Ne ative Vote (s): An appeal o the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision.) STAFF C0MMENTS: Placed on Planning Commission agenda of Nov. 29, 1977. J ,,v SPECIAL CONDITIONS FOR CASE NO. 103MF 1. Curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb cuts, and tie-in paving shall be provided on San Rafael in conformance with City Standards and the requirements of the City Engineer at the time of construction or by future agreement with the City Engineer. 2. A complete and detailed landscaping and irrigation plan, fencing, lighting, and sign plan shall be submitted to the Design Review Board prior to final approval. 3. Final construction drawings shall be submitted to the City Fire Marshal prior to the submittal of plans for Building Plan Check. 4. Applicant shall submit a written agreement in a form accept- able to the City Attorney to join any undergrounding district involving the subject property. 5. Applicant shall submit a perimeter fencing or wall plan to the DRB for approval as part of the submittal of final con- struction drawings. 6. Rear yard setback shall be a minimum of 20 feet. AGREEMENT I accept and agree, prior to use of this permit or approval, to comply with all the conditions set forth , and understand the Department of Building and Safety will not issue a build- ing permit or allow occupancy on the use permitted until this signed confirmation has been received by the Department of Environmental Services. (Date) (Applicant's Signature) .&QjF&ZI0d&UE W Yq OO 5 RE ***DESIGN REVIEW BOARD*** DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION Applicant ( Diem prat) fLde Ln HJ 1 4s-77a" c,c, c #.I 34( �'lL 5 Mailing Address Telephone 122 (_e, REQUEST: (Describe specific nature of approval requested) PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: WEST s;aE of SaN 2/qr-Act ASSESSOR IS PARCEL NO. EXISTING ZONING Z Property Owner Authorization THE UNDERSIG �D STATES THAT THEY ARE THE OWNER IS) OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN AND HEREBY GIVE AUTHOR- IZA 0 FOR FIL G OF THIS APPLICATION. � i� ' 1 SIGNATURE GATE AGREEMENT ABSOLVING THE CRY OF PALM DESERT OF ALL LIABILITIES RELATIVE TO ANY DEED RESTRICTIONS. 1 DO BY MY SIGNATURE 4 THIS EEMENT, ABSOLVE THE CITY OF PALM DESERT OF ALL LIABILITIES REGARDING ANY DEED RES- TRICTIONS THAT MAY BE APPLICABLE TO THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN. i 7 SIGNATURE D TE Applicants Signature SIGNATURE DATE (FOR STAFF USE ONLY) ENVIRONMENTAL STA US ACCEPTED BY MINISTERIAL ACT E.A. No. CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION ❑ NEGATIVE DECLARATION CASE NO. IO_P MF _ ❑ OTHER REFERENCE CASE NO. ' The Design Review Board process is the method by which the City of Palm Desert reviews detailed design and construction plans prior to the issuance of a building permit. DEPARTMENT APPLICATION OF ENVIRON- MENTAL SERVICES STAFF DESIGN (� PLANNING REVIEW 1—\ COMMISSION BOARD L� (APPROVES OR (ADVISORY) DENIES PROJECT) INTERIOR REMODELS, MINOR ELECTRICAL, MECHANICAL, OR PLUMBING PERMITS STAFF USE ONLY: POOLS a DEPARTMENT BUILDING AND CONSTRUCT SAFETY ION Date Received Date of ACTOR tIeeting ACTION APPLICANT NOTIFIED Staff DRB P.C. C.C. Department of Environmental Services Form 1 CITY OF PALM DESERT APPLICATION FORM DESIGN REVIEW BOARD PROCESS Design Review of: /o UrY/T• .9.�T• CoMP�E� TYPE OF PROJECT !J ,BEpELc. CASE NO. /03 /y%F Agreement of compliance to be signed by those applying for review. I hereby acknowledge that I have read and agree, to comply with all the following requirements, and understand that the Department of Building and Safety will not issue a building permit or allow occupancy on the use permitted until this signed confirmation has been received by the Department of Environmental Services. The development of this project shall conform substantially to all development plans submitted in behalf of this case, and as revised according to the Design Review Board process. Any minor change requires approval by the Director of Envi- ronmental Services. Any substantial change requires ap- proval by the Design Review Board. All requirements of any law, ordinance, or regulation of the State, City, and any other applicable government entity shall be complied with as part of the development process. This approval is applicable, subject to the development of this project, commencing within one year from approval date and being promptly completed. Landscaping (with irrigation system) shall be installed prior to final inspection and receiving certificate of occupancy. Curb, gutter, curb cuts, and tie-in paving shall be provided ong the full frontage of the lot by means of installation or to final inspection or other provisions as approved by e City Engineer. Construction shall conform to City Stan - and all requirements of the City Engineer. �T\ ( ate Department of Environmental Services Form 1 I REVISIONS I I _ -_ . ---- - 4- r-t Ilk, I� o� CITY 0 ■ Cn 000 ON C� LO N O �z m O od U- J U CZ w 'C6 jW mW � �c O Qcr Q U U _0 Wo cz U rrO Q m I i I i I i i i_ 1 DA , SCAL DRAWN G JOB SHEET OF aSHEETS DATAPRINT STOGKORAFTING FORM NO. 101-54