HomeMy WebLinkAbout104MF RONALD STEWARTMINUTES
PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION
APRIL 1, 1980 Page -2-
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS (continued)
The Commission concluded that the overall project, as conceptualized,
could conform to the City's General Plan, and that a specific determination
will be made when the proposed project is presented to the Commission.
VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Case Nos. CUP 16-77 and 104 MF JOHN ADAMS, Applicant
Request for approval of an amendment of Special Condition
No. 2 of an approved Conditional Use Permit to waive
undergrounding of utilities as part of construction and,
pursuant to Section 25.56.120 of the City of Palm Desert
Municipal Code, permit applicant to guarantee that said
property will voluntarily be part of any undergrounding
assessment district which may be established by the City
including the property in question, for property consist-
ing of approximately 1.5 acres, within the R-3 20,000(3),
S.P. (Multi -family Residential, minimum 20,000 square foot
lot, one dwelling unit per 3000 square feet of lot area,
Scenic Preservation Overlay) zone generally located on the
east side of Ocotillo Drive, approximately 400 feet south
of Tumbleweed Lane.
Mr. Crump presented this case stating that the applicant had requested
to amend the special condition regarding undergrounding of utilities because
one pole adjacent to the subject property services an existing single family
dwelling. Mr. Crump explained that an undergrounding district agreement could
be entered into as an alternative to undergrounding as a part of construction.
Staff recommended approval of an amendment to this condition.
Chairman Snyder asked if the applicant cared to make a presentation.
MR. JOHN ADAMS, 73-200 Tumbleweed Lane, gave a short presentation and
explained why he was opposed to the condition requiring undergrounding. He
also stated that there was no undergrounding on Ocotillo and did not feel it
was fair to him to have to pay this considerable expense himself. He then
introduced Mr. Wade.
MR. JOHN WADE, Electrical Contractor, 42-818 Clifford Street, pointed
out on the exhibit what would have to be undergrounded, the location of the
poles and development near the area. He explained why this condition should
be modified.
Chairman Snyder asked the applicant if he was in agreement with the
wording on the draft condition written in the Resolution, which included an
agreement guaranteeing voluntary participation in any undergrounding district.
Mr. Adams replied that he was agreeable to this draft condition.
Chairman Snyder opened the Public Hearing asking if anyone present
wished to speak in FAVOR or OPPOSITION to this case. There being none, the
Public Hearing was closed.
Commissioner Kryder agreed with Staff's recommendation, explaining that
the burden of undergrounding the utilities was not fair to the applicant.
Commissioner Berkey also agreed with Commissioner Kryder but felt the draft
condition should be modifed, deleting the requirement of undergrounding the
pole which had no service line connection.
Mr. Crump clarified the modification which read as follows: "Any/all
utility service lines on subject property, shall be placed underground prior
to occupancy clearance. Additionally, the property owner/developer shall
execute a record agreement, to run with the land, acceptable to the City
Attorney, guaranteeing voluntary participation in any undergrounding district
subsequently established by the City for that portion of the overhead utili-
ties adjacent to the site which are not undergrounded as a part of construction.
MINUTES
PALM'DESERT PLANNING*-OMMISSION
APRIL 1, 1980
VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS (continued)
The Commission concurred with the modification as read.
Page -3-
Upon motion made by Commissioner Kryder, seconded by Commissioner Berkey,
Special Condition No. 2 of Planning Commission Resolution No. 320, was amended
as stated, for Case Nos. CUP 16-77 and 104 MF, by adoption of Planning Commission
Resolution No. 583. Carried unanimously (4-0).
Case No. CUP 01-80 - DAVID HEUSINKVELD (Represented by:
HARRY H. SCHMITZ AND ASSOCIATES), Applicants
quest for approval of a Conditional Use Permit to convert
a ine unit apartment complex to "non -statutory" condominiums
of proximately 1000 square feet each on approximately .7
gros acres within the R-3 13,000 (3) (Multi -family Residen-
tial, inimum 13,000 square foot lot, one dwelling unit per
3000 fe of lot area) zone generally located at 73-415
Shadow Mo nta* Drive, approximately 700 feet east of
Tumbleweed ane.
Mr. Crump presente this case using an exhibit to point out the layout
of the complex. He noted at parking facilities were on one portion of the
site, which more resembled a apartment design, rather than cluster condominiums.
He also pointed out that the oposed carport location varied from the R-3
yard requirements. He concludN noting that letters had been received in favor
of the conversion, from present Xenters.
Chairman Snyder asked if th applicant cared to make a presentation.
MR. HARRY SCHMITZ, Planning Co sultant, 45-900 Paseo Coronado, felt
that the parking area and design was a ropriate and would not be detrimental.
He questioned three conditions: No. 10, requiring recordation of a tract map
before development; he felt this conditi did not apply since the project is
already developed. Mr. Crump explained t t it was necessary since the carports
still had to be built. No. 12, requiring tailed construction floor plans; he
felt this was also not necessary. Chairman nyder explained that this is a
requirement by the ordinance and the Commiss n had to abide by it. Mr. Crump
also stated that there was a question as to t floor area meeting the require-
ment of 1,000 sq. ft. minimum. No. 11, requiri g service wires to be undergrounded;
he felt this condition was an unfair burden to im since the service wires
would be connected to other buildings. The Comm sion agreed this was a
similar case to the one previously discussed and ncurred to amend this condition
to read as stated in the previous case, in Plannin Commission Resolution No. 583.
Chairman Snyder opened the Public Hearing ask g if anyone present wished
to speak in FAVOR or OPPOSITION to this case. There ing none, the Public
Hearing was closed.
Upon motion made by Commissioner Berkey, seconded by Commissioner Kryder,
Case No. CUP 01-80 was approved as amended, by adoption o Planning Commission
Resolution No. 584. Carried unanimously (4-0).
( C. Case No. CUP 02-80 - JOE E. BULOS, Applicant
Request for approval of a Conditional Use Permit to allow
construction of a nursery school for a maximum of 4
children on approximately .25 gross acres within the -1
10,000 (Single Family Residential, minimum 10,000 squ e
feet) zone generally located at the southeast corner o
Portola Avenue and Fairway Drive.
Mr. Crump presented this case showing the location of the prop ed
project on the exhibit. He explained why the design of the parking fa 'lities
was not adequate. Mr. Crump indicated that the Commission had two specs is
points to consider in their deliberations: 1) Whether the proposed loc ion
was appropriate for the intended use; and, 2) Whether the design of the to
was acceptable for the contemplated use.
MINUTES
PALM DESERT PLANNING 1MISSION
FEBRUARY 20, 1980 1 Page -4-
VIII. NEW BUSINESS (continued)
Mr. Crump had reviewed all the prior material and found there was
no mention of general/professional business offices.
Mr. Gilroy noted that 4800 sq. ft. of professional office space
was stated in his presentation material.
Mr. Williams explained that a matter of defining professional offices
for that area was probably needed.
Commissioner Berkey suggested that they act on the motion made and
then resolve the rest of the matter at a later time.
Mr. Crump pointed out that it might further clarify the definition of
offices if general offices and professional offices could be separated by
the applicant.and a specific listing of office uses submitted for Commission
review. Commission concurred.
Chairman Snyder reviewed the motion made, with the addition of:
"The category of General and Professional Offices will be further defined
and submitted for approval".
The motion was unanimous.
On the item for determination of the application of a condition of
approval, the Commission felt that their only concern was for the construc-
tion of one remaining pad. Commissioner Kryder made a minute motion to
allow the project to proceed in a normal and business like manner until
completion, it was seconded by Commissioner Miller. Carried unanimously (4-0).
IX. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ITEMS
Consideration of cases acted on by the Design Review Board at their
meeting of February 12, 1980.
Case No. 104 MF Mr. Sawa presented this case stating that this
was a -uni co o i lum project, which is now under construction. The
Design Review Board approved the preliminary plans to add a recreation
building and cabana with several modification. He reviewed the modi-
fications.
Case No. 102 C - Mr. Sawa presented this case stating that this
originally was reviewed by the Planning Commission as a conceptual plan.
The Design Review Board approved the preliminary plans for the addition
to the bank site With several revisions. He reviewed the revisions.
Case No.200 MF - Mr. Sawa presented this case stating that this
was also approved by the Design Review Board with some revisions.
He reviewed these revisions and recommended approval for the three items.
Commissioner Kryder asked if wind/blowsand protection along the
north and west side of the project wasn't necessary. It was discussed and
agreed to add the requirement of: Wind/blowsand protection shall be added
along the north and west side.
Upon motion made by Commissioner Kryder, seconded by Commissioner
Berkey, the Design Review Board actions were approved by adoption of
Planning Commission Resolution No. 573, as amended. Carried unanimously
(4-0). f
X. DISCUSSION ITEMS (continued)
B. General Plan Update
The Commission agreed to discuss this matter at the first meeting
in March.
C52.a� leaan= =cD=C�E)rOf`r,
45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260
TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611
April 10, 1980
REPORT OF DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION
CASE NO: 104 MF
APPLICANT: JOHN ADAMS, L. D. MCMACHEN and SCOTT MCKEE
NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of revised final landscaping plan
for 12 unit condominium project.
LOCATION: East side of Ocotillo Drive, south of Tumbleweed Lane.
ZONE: R-3 20,000(3), S.P.
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION:
Upon reviewing the submitted plans and the presentations by the
Staff and fy the applicant, the Design Review Board approves
this project, subject to revisions.
Date of Action: April 8, 1980
Vote:
5-0
(An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City
Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen (15) days of the
date of the decision.)
STAFF COMMENTS:
See attached Minutes.
i
MINUTES
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
APRIL 8,-1980
Page Two
III. CASES (Continued)
C e No. 203 MF - MACK DEVELOPMENT AND INVESTMENT COMPANY and WALLACH &
ASS ATES (Continued)
5. All 1-de-sacs and private streets to be designed per City standards.
6. Site p n to be modified to provide cul-de-sac at southerly end of new
north/so h street along easterly boundary of site per City requirements.
7. All condit ns of Development Plan 10-79 and Tentative Tract 14996 shall
be complied 'th.
8. All garages sh 1 be large enough to provide for trash cans within garage
area (20'x2O' cle dimensions are required for two -car garage).
9. Site plan to be re ' ed to provide 20 foot average distance between
buildings.
10. Final working drawings be modified to provide 20 foot deep driveway
aprons for all units.
11. Twenty foot aisle widths to a increased to 24 feet per Municipal Code
Requirements.
12. Landscaping between dwelling un s to be provided per typical blow-up
landscaping plan on file in the D rtment of Environmental Services.
13. Applicant should limit use of loquat rees.
14. Solar bronze windows to be utilized on 11 east, west and south facing
windows, including windows facing south der patio covers.
Carried 5-0 (Cook, Holden, Jackson, Johnson, Ma in).
Case No. 206 MF - MR. AND MRS. BOB SIPOVAC and STAN SSOVIC, AIA - prelimi-
nary approval of triplex on the east side of Octillo ive approximately
250 feet north of Verba Santa Drive; Diane Stadelman wa present.
The Board advised the applicant that the subject property s located within
the Palm Desert Homeowners Association area and, as such, sh located
be reviewed
by that body. It was deemed desirable to obtain their approva prior to
City review because of the feeling that the height limit as all ed in the
Association area was proposed to be exceeded. Therefore, the app icant was
advised to provide the City with a letter asking that their reques be
temporarily withdrawn until Homeowner Association approval can be ob ained.
The applicant agreed to obtaining Homeowner Association approval and, there-
fore, the Board agreed that a temporary withdrawal was desirable.
Case No. 104 MF - JOHN ADAMS and SCOTT McKEE - review of revised final land-
scaping plan for 12 unit condominium project presently under construction on
the east side of Octillo Drive, south of Tumbleweed Lane; Scott McKee was
present.
The applicant presented a revised final landscaping plan and requested
approval. The Board reviewed the revised plan and determined that the revised
plan was superior to the original plan. Therefore, on a motion by Cook,
seconded by Johnson, the Board moved to grant approval of the revised landsca-
ping plan.
Carried 5-0 (Cook, Holden, Jackson, Johnson, Martin).
C No. 204 MF - J.M. PETERS COMPANY and BALLEW-MCFARLAND - revised prelimi-
nary p s for 156 unit condominium development at the northeast corner of
Hovley Lan nd Cook Street; Patty Martin was present.
Mr. Crump presente evised site plan to the Board indicating that Planning
Commission had approved request with the provision that a secondary access
be provided to Via Cinta. The and reviewed the revised site plan and after
discussion determined that the acc to Via Cinta should be for emergency
vehicles only. The Board felt that al sidents and visitors should utilize
the entrance on Cook Street. Additionally, a Board felt the future raised
median in Cook Street should be broken to prove left turns.
On a motion by Martin, seconded by Cook, the Board mo to grant revised
preliminary approval subject to Via Cinta being a crash ga emergency access
only with left turns permitted on Cook Street for visitors an sidents.
Carried 4-0-1 (Cook, Jackson, Johnson, Martin, with Holden leaving du
consideration of this item).
4.
t
off IP�]lrm
45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260
TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611
REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
DATE April 2, 1980
APPLICANT John Adams
c/o L. D. McMachen, Inc.
74-872 Velie, No. 4
Palm Desert, CA 92260
CASE NO: CUP 16-77 and 104 MF
The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your
request and taken the following action at is meeting of
April 1, 1980
CONTINUED TO
DENIED BY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
X APPROVED BY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.538.
PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
FOR PUBLIC HEARING.
Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of
Environmental Services, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen (15) days of
the date of the decision.
cc: Applicant
C.V.C.W.D.
File CUP 16-77 an 104 MF
PAUL A. WILLIAMS, SECRETARY
PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION
PL, NG COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM
DESERT, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING A SPECIAL CONDITION OF APPROVAL
RELATIVE TO UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING, FOR A RESIDENTIAL CONDO-
MINIUM DEVELOPMENT LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF OCOTILLO DRIVE,
SOUTH OF TUMBLEWEED LANE.
CASE NOS. CUP 16-77 AND 104 MF
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California,
did on the 1st day of April, 1980, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider
a request by MR. RONALD STEWART for approval of an amendment of a Special Condi-
tion of an approved Conditional Use Permit to waive undergrounding of utilities as
part of construction and, pursuant to Section 25.56.120 of the City of Palm Desert
Municipal Code, permit applicant to guarantee that said property will voluntarily
be part of any undergrounding assessment district which may be established by the
City including the property in question, for property consisting of approximately
1.5 acres, within the R-3 20,000(3), S.P. (Multi -Family Residential, minimum
20,000 square foot lot, one dwelling unit per 3000 square feet of lot area, Scenic
Preservation Overlay) zone generally located on the east side of Ocotillo Drive,
approximately 400 feet south of Tumbleweed Lane, more particularly described as:
APN 627-282-012 thru 024
WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testi-
mony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said
Planning Commission did find the following facts to justify their actions, as
described below:
a. That the proposed conditional use development with an amended
condition relative to undergrounding of utilities is compatible
with existing and proposed development in the area.
b. That the proposed conditional use development with an amended
condition relative to undergrounding of utilities is compatible
with the objectives of the Zoning Ordinance and City General
( Plan.
LNOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of
ll Palm Desert, California, as follows:
That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute
the findings of the Commission in this matter.
That the Commission does hereby amend Special Condition No. 2
of Planning Commission Resolution No. 320, to read as follows:
"2. Any/all utility service lines on subject property, shall
be placed underground prior to occupancy clearance.
Additionally, the property owner/developer shall execute a
record agreement, to run with the land, acceptable to the
City Attorney, guaranteeing voluntary participation in any
undergrounding district subsequently established by the
City for that portion of the overhead utilities adjacent
to the site which are not undergrounded as a part of
construction."
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert
Planning Commission, held on this lst day of April, 1980, by the following vote,
to wit:
AYES: Berkey, Kryder, Miller, Snyder
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
WALTER SNYDER, Chairman
ATTEST:
PAUL A. WILLIAMS, Secretary
/dj
CITY OF PALM DESERT
STAFF REPORT
To: Planning Commission
Report on: Amendment to Utility Undergrounding Condition
Applicant: John Adams, c/o L. D. McMachen, Inc., 74-872 Velie, No. 4,
Palm Desert, California 92260
Case Nos: CUP 16-77 and 104 MF
Date: April 1, 1980
I. REQUEST:
Request for approval of an amendment of Special Condition of an approved Conditional
Use Permit to waive undergrounding of utilities as part of construction and,
pursuant to Section 25.56.120 of the City of Palm Desert Municipal Code, per-
mit applicant to guarantee that said property will voluntarily be part of any
undergrounding assessment district which may be established by the City inclu-
ding the property in question, for property consisting of approximately 1.5
acres, within the R-3 20,000(3), S.P. (Multi -Family Residential, minimum
20,000 square foot lot, one dwelling unit per 3000 square feet of lot area,
Scenic Preservation Overlay) zone generally located on the east side of
Ocotillo Drive, approximately 400 feet south of Tumbleweed Lane.
LOCATIONAL MAP:
II. BACKGROUND:
A. ADJACENT ZONING/LAND USE:
North: R-3 20,000(3), S.P.
South: R-3 20,000(3), S.P.
East: R-1 12,000
West: R-3 18,000(3), S.P.
B. PREVIOUS PERTINENT CASES:
Case Nos. CUP 16-77 and 104 MF, original approval for 12 unit condominium
project, approved by Planning Commission Resolution No. 320, January 3,
1978.
STAFF REPORT
April 1, 1980 Page Two
III. DISCUSSION:
The Conditional Use Permit for subject condominium development was approved
with the standard requirement for undergrounding overhead utilities. One
of the two poles the project would be responsible for undergrounding provides
service to a single-family dwelling. There are no service connections to the
second pole. The applicant requests to be relieved from any undergrounding
as a part of construction.
Municipal Code (Zoning Ordinance), Section 25.56.120, provides that the
Planning Commission may allow an agreement to enter into an undergrounding
district inlieu of utilities being undergrounded as a part of construction.
Staff's position on the matter is that the project should be required to
underground the pole and lines that do not provide service connections to
existing structures, versus a blanket waiver of undergrounding as a part of
construction.
IV. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Based on the justification contained in the draft Resolution:
Approve amendment to Special Condition No. 2, of Planning Commission Resolu-
tion No. 320, relative to which overhead utilities require undergrounding as
a part of construction, by adopting Planning Commission Resolution No.
44. ;b, 'h2c'ma,", ga. I
General Construction, License No. B-354836
74-872 Velie, No. 4 . Palm Desert, California 92260. (714)346-6707
73-200 / wn& Eer.,ezd y22
/tea tm bezp-s t, Lale . 92260
TzkwaaV 78, 1980
Ra Nm Lie aeic t I'Ea ua iix� Comnci 66Lon
Ct t/ of '(QM Gese�%t
45-275 Ream. Lake
Patin Ue�, Ca i 4onn.La 92260 e %y
ups
A-': 12 &&Lt Condom"uym on Qco.tiJ-k Llga-
(Ca6e No. 104 N)
CGt RIto -77
AUached .to .thi"s ie.tten. u a coj&, of the janaw;` 18,
1980, lwwwucotioa ieAta�d .to .t:e &LoLe ne7.eicefxce fyeojeet
necezved fnaz .the LAecton of 6nLunnnwjdai Sea�Lu<xea. The
under zhigned ourzen. doeb AC"L,, �".oJ'�f `-Uy Aequez` Luat ned i4
f,om .the unden,.no�uu z, of .the polez F,e rqjonded unae& SectiAa
25.56. 120 of the (Jnd::uu)�DA of the Li t1� o¢ Patin L7e.aen t.
The fowen �f�of.Le�z on the non.tA end of .the i n og eet
�'..uAai-6h ouen/7Pcw% e-tec-liu.caana: ktzwtltea. 4e-4"'-C- .to ale
al- acent 14e-6tde1ce. faeAe i6 w cEoaed a /,VLoZoanafvt of zaid
fou,z Jo4", .t4&6twtia�j tine ouenhead ae�+ , .
✓.t could xe ueni� d.Ztficuet fon..tiu-6 nwcL"t d aw-wfr
men.t .to azai.mwtate .the uaict.oue exfxjz.6iLe ratted
fon in .the janucuu,� 18, 196'0 ietteA pwnz .the %)ijwe ,z of
o &LWI nrren.tr:,t 3ZaL4x-". ✓.t Z6 ue4�4 douL4u.E ttwt Li4J 12,10dzct
could con.tinae 4.n 1he a Bence o¢ 4-w- n" nen"�.
kez�aa-v -&�,
ma, Ounen.
ct: /12at H. lU.t 4Luva6, 19'U'
(z9fichp� cow IF831n= i)QP=onDt�
45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT,CAUFORNIA92260
TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611
January 18, 1980
L. D. hlcMachen, Inc.
74-872 Velie, #4
Palm Desert, CA 92260
Re: 12 Unit Condominium on Ocotillo Drive
(Case No. 104 MF)
Dear Mr. McMachen:
This is to inform you that in addition to installing underground
utility service lines, the Palm Desert Municipal Code requires
that distribution lines on or abutting the subject property be
installed underground. This means that the lines on the two
poles abutting the rear of the site must be undergrounded with
the two poles removed.
Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel
free to contact this office.
Very-tr ty yours,
Paul A. Williams, AICP
Director of Environmental Services
PAW/dj
cc: Rick Holden
Ron Stewart
Gt'Lop o:ff IB:Iemn=. =CD=cDn�-(I
45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260
TELEPHONE (714) 346-06I1
March 13, 1980
REPORT OF DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION
CASE NO: 104 MF
APPLICANT: JOHN ADAMS and RICK HOLDEN
NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of final plans to add recreation
building and cabana to 12 unit condominium presently under construction.
LOCAIION: East side of Ocotillo Drive, south of Tumbleweed Lane.
ZONE: R-3 20,000(3), S.P.
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION:
Upon reviewing the submitted plans and the presentations by the
Staff and fy the applicant, the Design Review Board approves
this project. XX1UX0(XUXV0(XXiU XXAU1X%X
Date of Action:
Vote:
March 11, 1980
3-0-1 (Holden abstaining)
(An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City
Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen (15) days of the
date of the decision.)
STAFF COMMENTS:
See attached Minutes.
MINUTES
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
TUESDAY - MARCH 11, 1980
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
The meeting was called to order at 2:30 p.m. after a two and
study session. /
ENT:
MEMBERS ABSENT:
STAFF PRESENT:
Rick Holden
Phyllis Jacks
Charles Ma n
Bernie ng
h Barton
Cook
&.Johnson
Stan Sawa _�
Murrel Crump
It was moved by ng, seconded by Martin, that the Min
1980, be appro d as written.
Carried (Holden, Jackson, Leung, Martin).
-half hour
February 26,
II. Mie motion approving cases found acceptable at the study session:
use No. 104 M JOHN ADAMS and RICK HOLDEN - approval of final plans to
recrea ion building and cabana to 12 unit condominium presently under
construction on the east side of Octillo Drive, south of Tumbleweed Lane .
This item was approved as submitted.
se No. 151 MF - TOM TROLLOPE - six month time extension on/aalled
fi 1 plans for six unit apartment complex at the northwest
Tumb weed Lane and Sage Lane.
This item s approved with condition that curb and gutter bs
a part of th' project and that a sixfoot high masonary pere
provided.
Carried 3-0-1 (Jack�.Qn, Leung, Martin, with Holden abstairr(ng).
III. CASES
Case No. 190 MF - MICHAEL N. CURO and RALEIGH KA - approval of final
plans for triplex apartment on orth side of San Rosa Way, approximately
85 feet east of San Pasqual Aven ; Michael N. curo and Raleigh Karr were
present.
The items pointed out in the Staff Rep r were reviewed with the applicant
agreeing to revise the final working ings to reflect preliminary approval
and the Staff concerns.
On a motion by Holden, seconded Leung, the oard granted final approval,
subject to the following items eing incorporat into the final working
drawings:
1. All sizes of land
2. All planter areas
3. Gazanias to be us
4. Overhead trellis
5. Carport locati
24 foot driv ay
6. Treatment a ound
wood trim
scap' g materials to be noted o final working drawings.
t e separated by redwood heade
e,1 in planter areas.
o be shown on east side of dwelling.
to be modified so that wing walls do n
area.
windows and doors to be stucco pop -outs
encroach into
atiher than
7. Curb an gutter to be installed as required by the Director o
Works.
8. Five eet of dedication to be granted to the City along Santa
re ired by the Director of Public Works.
Car/ied 4-0 (Holden, Jackson, Leung, Martin).
lic
as
NDA ITEM NO. III, A-1
DATE March 11, 1980
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
CASE NO. 104 MF
APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) John Adams (73-200 Tumbleweed Lane, Palm Desert,
CA 92260) and Rick Holden (73-730 Highway 111, Suite 5, Palm Desert, CA
O
NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT Approval of final plans to add
--recreation building and cabana_t9 12 unit condominium_ presently under_ —
cons ruction.
LOCATION East side of Ocotillo Drive, south of Tumbleweed Lane
ZONE R-3, 20,000 (3), S.P.
This request was granted preliminary approval by the Board on
February 12, 1980.
STAFF ANALYSIS:
It appears the plans are in compliance with the preliminary approval.
The Board should review the plans in that light.
Ie
MINUTES
DESIGN REVIEW. BOARD
FEBRUARY 12, 1980
Page Four
III. CASES (Continued)
Case . 200 MF (Continued)
Provision for blowsand protection were discussed with the Board feeling that
it is not cessary along the north boundary because of the development of a
mobile home ubdivision and golf course. However, it was felt that blowsand
protection al g the west, including adjacent to the public park, is desirable.
On a motion by rtin, seconded by Barton, the Board moved to grant preliminary
approval, subject o the following revisions:
1. All Code require nts, as specified in the Staff Report dated February 12,
1980, shall be com lied with.
2. Provisions for trash ick-up be clarified with final working drawings.
3. Perimeter wall details o all four sides of the project be submitted with
final working drawings.
4. All conditions of the Develo ent Plan and Tentative Tract Map to be
complied with.
5. Provide windjbiowsand protection along west property line (provide typical
sections to show blowsand protection).
Carried 4-0-1 (Barton, Cook, Jackson, Martin, with Holden abstaining).
Case No. 104 MF - JOHN ADAMS and RICK HOLDEN - approval of preliminary plans
to add recreation building and cabana to 12 unit condominium project presently
�—under construction on the east side of Octillo Drive, south of Tumbleweed Lane;
Rick Holden was present.
The Board reviewed the plans submitted by the applicant. The recreation
building was deemed architecturally compatible with the main structure.
On a motion by Martin, seconded by Cook, the Board granted preliminary approval
of this request, subject to the following revisions:
1. Final working drawings -to include a revised landscaping plan for the area
surrounding the recreation area.
2. Final working drawings to include a section view showing relation of
recreation area and building to perimeter wall along the rear property line.
3. Final working drawings to include all four elevations of the building.
Carried 4-0-1 (Barton, Cook, Jackson, Martin, with Holden abstaining).
IV. DISCUSSION ITEMS
Cay,g No. DP 01-80 - KENT LAND COMPANY - Development Plan to allow 48 dwelling
unit on the north side of Hovley Lane between Monterey Avenue and Portola
Avenue.
The Board viewed the submitted site plan and building elevation plans. It
was noted t t the building elevations would be identical to the project
located to th east. It was noted that a perimeter wall would be provided
around all four ides of the project. The Board felt that the project, as
indicated, was co eptually acceptable.
Case No. 188 MF - PA`GJ FIC COAST BUILDF.P.S - condominium project located at the
northeast corner of CciQk Street and Country Club Drive; Steve Fleshman was
present.
The applicant presented ps showing how passive solar protection would
be provided within the prof ct. Additionally, he discussed the possibility of
moving the air conditioning condensers to the roof for some units. The Board
made several suggestions regarding this. The Board felt that provided they
were screened adequately, this would be acceptable. The Board then discussed
-0< faw
VG
:
FA.r-ZIAL 61-it,
or1
EIl":��6'Ea'k9
mow.. --,.tee_._
OF
PALPj 033c3i
C:
i
0
45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260
TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611
REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
DATE February 20, 1980
APPLICANT Rick Holden
73-730 Highway 111, Suite 5
Palm Desert. CA 92260
CASE NO:
The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your
request and taken the following action at is meeting of
February 0. 1980
CONTINUED TO
DENIED BY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
x APPROVED BY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.573
PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
FOR PUBLIC HEARING.
Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of
Environmental Services, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen (15) days of
the date of the decision.
PAUL A. WILLIAMS, SECRETARY
PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION
cc: Applicant
C.V.C.W.D.
File
MINUTES
DESIGN REVIEW. BOARD
FEBRUARY 12, 1980
III. CASES (Continued)
Case No. 200 MF (Continued)
Page Four
Provisions for blowsand protection were discussed with the Board feeling that
it is not necessary along the north boundary because of the development of a
mobile home subdivision and golf course. However, it was felt that blowsand
protection along the west, including adjacent to the public park, is desirable.
On a motion by Martin, seconded by Barton, the Board moved to grant preliminary
approval, subject to the following revisions:
1. All Code requirements, as specified in the Staff Report dated February 12,
1980, shall be complied with.
2. Provisions for trash pick-up be clarified with final working drawings.
3. Perimeter wall details on all four sides of the project be submitted with
final working drawings.
4. All conditions of the Development Plan and Tentative Tract Map to be
complied with.
5. Provide windjblowsand protection along west property line (provide typical
sections to show blowsand protection).
Carried 4-0-1-(Barton, Cook, Jackson, Martin, with Holden abstaining).
Case No. 104 MF - JOHN ADAMS and RICK HOLDEN - approval of preliminary plans
to add recreation building and cabana to 12 unit condominium project presently
undes_c�uction on the east side of Octillo Drive, south of Tumbleweed Lane;
Rick Holden was present.
The Board reviewed the plans submitted by the applicant. The recreation
building was deemed architecturally compatible with the main structure.
On a motion by Martin, seconded by Cook, the Board granted preliminary approval
of this request, subject to the following revisions:
1. Final working drawings to include a revised landscaping plan for the area
surrounding the recreation area.
2. Final working drawings to include a section view showing relation of
recreation area and building to perimeter wall along the rear property line.
3. Final working drawings to include all four elevations of the building.
Carried 4-0-1 (Barton, Cook, Jackson, Martin, with Holden abstaining).
IV. DISCUSSION ITEMS
Case No. DP 01-80 - KENT LAND COMPANY - Development Plan to allow 48 dwelling
units on the north side of Hovley Lane between Monterey Avenue and Portola
Avenue.
The Board reviewed the submitted site plan and building elevation plans. It
was noted that the building elevations would be identical to the project
located to the east. It was noted that a perimeter wall would be provided
around all four sides of the project. The Board felt that the project, as
indicated, was conceptually acceptable.
Case No. 188 MF - PACIFIC COAST BUILDERS - condominium project located at the
northeast corner of Cook Street and Country Club Drive; Steve Fleshman was
present.
The applicant presented plans showing how passive solar protection would
be provided within the project. Additionally, he discussed the possibility of
moving the air conditioning condensers to the roof for some units. The Board
made several suggestions regarding this. The Board felt that provided they
were screened adequately, this would be acceptable. The Board then discussed
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 573
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM
DESERT, CALIFORNIA, ANNOUNCING FINDINGS AND APPROVING, THE
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION AT THEIR MEETING OF FEBRUARY 12,
1980.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California,
III review the Design Review Board actions of February 12, 1980, approving:
Case No. 104 MF - Preliminary plans for recreation building and cabana
for 12 unit condominium project on the east side of
Ocotillo Drive, south of Tumbleweed Lane for JOHN
ADAMS.
Case No. 102 C - Preliminary plans for commercial building addition
to Security Pacific Bank site located at the south-
east corner of E1 Paseo and Portola Avenue for SPGA
PLANNING AND ARCHITECTURE.
Case No. 200 MF - Preliminary plans for 264 unit condominium project at
the northeast corner of Monterey Avenue and Country
Club Drive for the MAYER GROUP.
WHEREAS, at this time, upon receiving and considering all testimony and
arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said Commission
did find sufficient facts and reasons to exist to approve the Design Review Board
action of February 12, 1980.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of
Palm Desert, California, as follows:
-1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute
the fin`iingc of the CnmmiSSinn in these rases;
2. That it does hereby approve the Design Review Board actions of
February 12, 1980, except that for case 200 MF, the wind/blowsand
protection shall be provided on the north and west.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert
Planning Commission, held on this 20th day of February, 1980, by the following
vote, to wit:
AYES: BERKEY, KRYDER, MILLER, SNYDER
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
WALTER SNYDER, Chairman
ATTEST:
PAUL A. WILLIAMS, Secretary
/dj
NDA ITEM NO. III, B-2
DATE February 12, 1980
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
CASE NO. 104 MF
APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) John Adams (73-200 Tumbleweed Lane, Palm Desert,
CA 92260) and Rick Holden (73-730 Highway 111, Suite 5, Palm Desert, CA
92260)
NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT Approval of preliminary plans to add
recreation building and cabana to 12 unit condominium presently under
•uction.
ON East side of Octillo Drive, south of Tumbleweed Lane
ZONE R-3, 20,000 (3), S.P.
The original plans which were approved for this development showed a pool
within the yard area. The applicant now wishes to add a small recreation
building (465 square feet) and a cabana (220 square feet). The recreation
building would contain changing facilities and a sauna and exercise room.
The finished grade of the building will be approximately 4 feet below the
pad height of the units to the south. This has been done in order to
retain the views to the north. The building setback from the rear property
line will be the same as that for the main dwelling units. The architectural
style and materials will be compatible with the main structures.
STAFF ANALYSIS:
It appears that the proposed construction will be compatible with the
project and surrounding properties. The Board should review the submitted
exhibits and determine acceptability. Should the Board recommend approval
of this request to the Planning Commission, Staff recommends that the
following items be considered as conditions:
1. Final working drawings to include a revised landscaping plan for the
area surrounding the recreation area.
2. Final working drawings to include a section view showing relation of
recreation area and building to wall along the rear property line.
3. Final working drawings to include all four elevations of building.
9 'J
RCNI'
K_ [L [
OTI-IT-kV
00U
RCNI,
101
O lFU'Il n`
y
0
Y
0
3 February 19R0
Planning Department
City of Palm iesert
45-275 Prickly„Pear
Palm Desert, California 92260
lease accept this letter as a request to
review the plans for a recreation building
for Xr. Jack _dams. 7"'y understanding is that
the total project has been previously approved
and this would only require an amendment to
the original approval.
The new building as shown will contain a
_recreation room, sauna, shower, toilet
facilities and a cabana area. It will take
the place of the pool in the original project,
although we have also added a pool here. The
building will be about a feet underground at
the high end of the lot and at grade near the
center. This was done mainly so as to not
restrict views for either the residences
behind or in the project. Colors and materials
will relate to the other structures in the
project.
1 •r,ould appreciate your action on this.
• • r Si cerely
0
00
R ONITEC'
InrLn[JrkV
2ML�'
RCNI'
��
0
I
00007
73-730 HIGHWAY 111, SUITE 5 / PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 / (714) 346-5088
247 E. TAHQUITZ-McCALLUM WAY, SUITE 21 / PALM SPRINGS, CA. 92262 / (714) 320-1901
1 Q '_KITE T
N
� N
,:0161Po
0
� u
eQ 0
t,-%o
as
i
"� dF
FA'.'-] JESER'
4MENT
OF
\3NIRONMENTAI
SERVICES
;E
PAP—ZIA.L 1-6I i-r✓ Pl4tJ No.._JO1i-!�]f
t.
CITY OF
PALM DESERT
DEPARTMENT _
OF
ENVIRONMENTAL"'
SERVICES. - -
EXHIBiT
NO. ------_...............:.
CAy (o�i►'�'F ,,,
CITY OF
PALM DESERT
DEPARTMENT _
OF
ENVIRONMENTAL"'
SERVICES. - -
EXHIBiT
NO. ------_...............:.
CAy (o�i►'�'F ,,,
' I d OF
PAIU1 DESERT
DEPARTMENT
OF
ENVIRONMENTAL
SERVICES
_''H,E'T
NJ.
CASE��_lTT
NO.
SHAR DON HOMEOWNERS ASS "N.
45-830 OCOTILLO DRIVE
PALM DESERT, CA 92250
January 22, 1980
L. D. McMachen, Inc.
74_872 Velie, �4
Palm Desert, California 92260-
Gentlemen:
Permission is granted to use our wall foundation on the north
and of our property to increase the height of the existing wall to the
required specifications as set forth by the City of Palm Desert.
Yours truly,
S iAR D014 BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Rap Lawrence
c
Doris C. pBerry
Edith Willman
(3:q${aiz' Oo nDMM= �1Zi®SP'�n
45.275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260
TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 _
ON
R�Iz:
p Non r;:i
No Sur
Aare«., Ron Stewart
t `J Addmt Linsco Agencies
Ade.. 605 N. 3rd, Suite 202
` Mo°"'
PeIL. , Richmond, British Columbia
No SN CANADA'i
❑ Dure,
❑
Refuse
NetusY
Deceu,.'
Ddf_ce
r
A
45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260
TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611
January 18, 1980
L. D. McMachen, Inc.
74-872 Velie, #4
Palm Desert, CA 92260
Re: 12 Unit Condominium on Ocotillo Drive
(Case No. 104 MF)
Dear Mr. McMachen:
This is to inform you that in addition to installing underground
utility service lines, the Palm Desert Municipal Code requires
that distribution lines on or abutting the subject property be
installed underground. This means that the lines on the two
poles abutting the rear of the site must be undergrounded with
the two poles removed.
Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel
free to contact this office.
ery ly yours,
Paul A. Williams, AICP
Director of Environmental Services
PAW/dj
cc: Rick Holden
Ron Stewart /�
45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260
TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611
January 18, 1980
L. D. McMachen, Inc.
74-872 Velie, #4
Palm Desert, CA 92260
Re: 12 Unit Condominium on Ocotillo Drive
(Case No. 104 MF)
Dear Mr. McMachen:
This is to inform you that in addition to installing underground
utility service lines, the Palm Desert Municipal Code requires
that distribution lines on or abutting the subject property be
installed underground. This means that the lines on the two
poles abutting the rear of the site must be undergrounded with
the two poles removed.
Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel
free to contact this office.
Very—tr�yly yours,
Paul A. Williams, AICP
Director of Environmental Services
PAW/dj
cc: Rick Holden
Ron Stewart
45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260
TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611
REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
DATE 2/7/79
APPLICANT RONALD STEWART
CASE NO.: CUP 16-77 IC4 mr
The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request
and taken the following action at its meeting of
January 30, 1979
CONTINUED
I1:1� 4*11
X APPROVED BY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 450
PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
FOR CONCURRENCE WITH THE PLANNING
COMMISSION DECISION.
PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
FOR PUBLIC HEARING.
Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Environmental
Services, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision.
PAUL A. WILLIAMS, SECRETARY
PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSSION
cc: Applicant
C.V. CW/D.
File ;
rR \
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 450
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, ANNOUNCING FIND-
INGS AND GRANTING A 12-MONTH TIME EXTENSION FOR A
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND PRELIMINARY DESIGN
REVIEW TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF 12 CONDOMINIUM UNITS
ON A PARCEL APPROXIMATELY ONE AND ONE-HALF ACRES IN
SIZE ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE
OF OCOTILLO, SOUTH OF TUMBLEWEED WITHIN THE R-3
20,000(3), S.P. ZONE.
CASE NO. CUP 16-77 AND 104 MF
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Palm Desert Zoning
Ordinance, the Planning Commission did on January 30, 1979, hold a
duly noticed Public Hearing to consider the request of RONALD STEWART
for approval of a Conditional Use Permit time extension to allow con-
struction of 12 condominium units on a parcel generally located on the
east side of Ocotillo, south of Tumbleweed within the R-3 20,000(3),
S.P. (Multi -family residential, 20,000 sq. ft minimum lot size,
minimum 3,000 sq. ft. of lot area/unit, Scenic Preservation Overlay)
zone, more particularly described as:
Lots 10, 11, 12, Block F-3,
Palm Desert Unit 3
WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering
all testimony and argument, the Planning Commission did find the
following facts and reasons to exist to justify the granting of approval
of said Conditional Use Permit time extension:
1. The location of the project is in accord with the objectives
of the Zoning Ordinance and the purpose of the district in
which the site is located.
2. The location of the proposed use and the conditions under
which it would be operated or maintained will not be detri-
mental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or be
materially injurious to properties or improvements in the
vicinity.
3. The proposed use will comply with each of the applicable
provisions of the Zoning Ordinance.
4. The proposed use complies with the goals, objectives, and
policies of the City`s General Plan.
5. Considerations relating to the original approval have not
substantially changed.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the
City of Palm Desert, as follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct and consti-
tute the findings of the Commission in this case.
2. Approval of the time extension for Conditional Use Permit
and Preliminary Design Review is granted to RONALD STEWART
for a twelve-month period, subject to the attached conditions.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City
of Palm Desert Planning Commission held on the 30th day of January, 1979,
by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: BERKEY, FLESHMAN, KELLY, KRYDER, SNYDER
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
ABSTAIN:NONE
GLORIA KELLY, Chairman
ATTEST:
PAUL A. WILLIAMS, Secretary
/ss
CASE NO. CUP 16-77, TIME EXTENSION
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
1. The conditions contained in Planning Commission Resolution No. 320
shall remain in full force for the term of this extension.
2. Implementation of CUP 16-77 and Case 104 MF, pursuant to
Section 25.72.110 of the Municipal Code of the City of Palm Desert,
California, shall occur on, or before, January 18, 1980, or this
approval shall lapse and become void.
Minutes
Palm Desert Planning Commission
January 3, 1978 Page Six
VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS (Cont.)
D. Case Nos. CUP 19-77 and 106MF - CHARLES ROOT, Applicant
Request for approval of a Conditional Use Permit and
Preliminary Design Review to construct 21 condominium
units on approximately 3.48 acres within the R-3 and
R-3(3) zone on a site generally located between Driftwood
Drive and Sage Brush Drive.
Mr. Williams reviewed the case and the conditions of approval.
Chairman Berkey declared the Public Hearing open and asked
if the applicant wished to speak at this time. MAN SAMENDED
CHARLES ROOT, 73-225 Bursera Way, add e s - e —
theCommission
i
and noted that the units are less than adjoning operty
and that he is in agreement with the conditions of approval.
Chairman Berkey asked if there was anyone wishing to speak in
FAVOR or in OPPOSITION to the project. Being none, he declared the
Public Hearing closed and asked for the pleasure of the Commission.
On a motion by Commissioner Kryder, seconded by Commissioner
Reading the case was approved by Planning Commission Resolution No.
319; carried unanimously (5-0).
E. Case Nos. CUP 16-77 and 04MF - RO ALD STEWART, Applicant
Request for approval of a . Tonal Use Permit and
Preliminary Design Review to construct 12 condominium
units in the R-3 20,000(3) S.P. zone on approximately
1.5 acres generally located on the east side of Ocotillo,
south of Tumbleweed.
Mr. Williams reviewed the case noting the type of units and
that they are in conformance with the zoning. He noted the Design
Review Board Conditions of Approval and their concerns with the pro-
ject as pointed out in Conditions 6 & 7. Mr. Williams stated that
the applicant was not present but he was in agreement with the con-
ditions.
Chairman Berkey declared the Public Hearing open and asked
if there was anyone wishing to speak in FAVOR or in OPPOSITION to the
project.
CHARLES ROOT, project builder, noted that this being
a condominium project, it will not have the same park-
ing problems that an apartment complex has.
JACK LEIGH, Verba Santa, stated that he faces the pro-
posed project and he is very please with the project.
Chairman Berkey declared the Public Hearing closed and asked
the pleasure of the Commission.
On a motion by Commissioner Reading, seconded by Commissioner
Kelly, the case was approved subject to the conditions, by Planning
Commission Resolution No. 320; carried unanimously (5-0).
R
Cut:(b,zF (Oxff5 � �51r � CHIP O
45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260
TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION REPORT
Date:Mav 30. 1978
REPORT ON: 12-unit condominium project
CASE NO.: 104MF ZONE: R-3 20,000(3), S.P.
LOCATION: East side of Ocotillo, south of Tumbleweed
APPLICANT: RONALD STEWART
NATURE OF APPROVAL SOUGHT: Final working drawings
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION:
After reviewing the submitted plans and the presentations by
the staff and by the applicant, the DRB APPROVED
this project, subject to the attached conditions.
Date of Action:
Motion Made By
Seconded By:
Vote:
23. 1978
Urrutia
Jackson
4-0
Reasons for Ne ative Vote (s):
(An appeal of the ove action may be made in writing to the City Clerk
of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen (W days of the date of the
decision.)
STAFF COMMENTS:
a
DESIGN REVIE7i BOARD
DATE • )tag• 2" . 1978
CASE NO.: 104MF
APPLICANT: RONALD STEWART
LOCATION: East side of Ocotillo, south of Tumbleweed
ZONING: R-3 20,000(3), S.P.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the final construction drawings.
17_
Standard Conditio
`,*OS.-r'--i' 1t3-77 lot ','If
1. The development of this projfr(-t shall conform substantially to
all plans submitted in behalf of this ease (Exhibit--3A-D), ar,i
as revised accordin, to the Design Review Board pr,x;ess and!;r
Planning Commission Action. Any minor chant^s requirQ appt•;%al
by the Director of Environmental S(2rvices. Any sui):;tantial cnan n
i requires approval by the Planning Commission.
2. All requirements of any law, ordinance, or re;ulation of the S ate
City, and any other applicable government entity shall be complied
with as part of the development process.
3. This approval is applicable, subject to the development of tl.is
project, commencing within one year from approval date and bein promptly completed.
4. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for construction of any
use contemplated by this approval, the applicant shall firs: obtain
permits and/or clearance from the following agencies:
County Department of Public Health
Palm Desert Design Review Board Process
Coachella Valley County {eater District
Regional Water Quality Control Board ;7
5. Plans and specifications shall conform to the City of Palm Desert
standard specifications, development procedures and design criteria.
Any modifications, thereof, shall require approval of the City
Engineer.
Special hand Design Review Conditions:
1. Curbs, gutters, and tie-in paving shall be installed on Ocotillo.
2. Any/all utility service and distribution lines on or abutting the
subject property, shall be placed underground prior to occupancy
clearance.
3. Final construction drawings including a final landscaping, grading,
lighting, amenitites, trash storage, walkway layout, and irrigation
plan shall be submitted to the Design Review Board. No final in-
spection or occupancy permit shall be given by the Department of
Environmental Services to this project until the aforementioned
approved plans and construction shall have been completed.
4. Applicant shall furnish evidence of property owners's associations's
approval of subject plans prior to submittal of final construction
drawings to the Design Review, Board.
5. A six foot masonry wall shall be installed on the rear property
line.
6. Provide pedestrian connections from the units to the garages.
CASE N'CS . C.-1 a - 7
Sreciai and Deli=a °,, :,. Gii.:t)ns: (Cant. )
7. Provide-anaddl`cign;- trash- :?nc1OS71 I'n -!n t::.� t7ttn tC;'
ject.
AGREEMENT
I accept and agree, prior to use of this permit or approval, to com-
ply with all the conditions set forth, and understand that the De-
partment of Building and Safety will not issue a building permit or
allow occupancy on the use permitted until this signed confirmation
has been received by the Department of Environmental Services.
(Date) (applicant's Signature)
(KYf.f�Up oil IF'alI1.ni�n..
45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260
TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION REPORT
Date: Dec. 28, 1977
REPORT ON: 12 Condominium Units
CASE NO.: 104MF ZONE: R-3 20,000(3), S.P.
LOCATION: East side of Ocotillo, south of Tumbleweed
APPLICANT: RONALD STEWART
NATURE OF APPROVAL, SOUGHT: Preliminary site, floor and elevations
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION:
After reviewing the submitted plans and the presentations by
the staff and by the applicant, the DRB lED
this project, subject to the attached con itions.
Date of Action: Dec. 27, 1977
Motion Made By: Jackson
Seconded By: Minturn
Vote: 5-0
Reasons for Ne atiye Vote (s):
An appeal o the above action may be made in writing to the
City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen (15) days
of the date of the decision.)
STAFF COMMENTS: Placed on Planning Commission Agenda of Jan. 3, 1978.
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
CASE NO.: 104MF
APPLICANT: RONALD STEWART
DATE:Dec. 27, 1977
LOCATION:
East
side of
Ocotillo, south of Tumbleweed
ZONING:
R-3
20,000(3),
S.P.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the preliminary site floor and -elevation plans.
9POO MR9 ***DESIGN REVIEW BOARD***
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
PLANNING DIVISION
aAIAL6 S7-6w4&-T-
Applicant 1 please pr�nl)
kilvsc-o a/rE 20 v
REQUEST: (Describe specific nature of approval requested)
12 UNy r Co vzomt"lu h
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
oTS /O // / L �G/� 3 .d , 4,9Af I T It 3
ASSESSOR IS PARCEL NO.
EXISTING ZONING �-3 a0,aro (3), S.//.
d('o73- /GS /
Telephone
z Ip-GOde
Property Owner Authorization THE UNDERSIGNED STATES THAT THEY ARE THE OWNER (S) OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN AND HEREBY GIVE AUTHOR -
ION FOR THE FILING OF THIS APPLICATION.
tt c,Q lam.
NATURE DATE
AGREEMENT ABSOLVING THE CITY OF PALM DESERT OF ALL LIABILITIES RELATIVE TO ANY DEED RESTRICTIONS.
I DO BY MY SIGNATURE ON THIS AGREEMENT, ABSOLVE THE CITY OF PALM DESERT OF ALL LIABILITIES REGARDING ANY DEED RES-
TRICTIONS THAT MAY BE APPLICABLE TO THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN,
44
_IGtrATU RE DATE
Applicant's Signature //\' Ik A 77
SIGNATURE DATE
(FOR STAFF USE ONLY) ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS ACCEPTED BY
❑ MINISTERIAL ACT E.A. No.
❑ CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION CASE No.
❑ NEGATIVE DECLARATION P /�—�� _
❑ OTHER RErERENCE CASE NO. • '
The Design Review Board
reviews detailed design
permit.
DEPARTMENT
APPLICATION OF ENVIRON-
MENTAL
SERVICES
STAFF
process is the method by which the City of Palm Desert
and construction plans prior to the issuance of a building
DESIGN
REVIEW
BOARD
(ADVISORY)
PLANNING
COMMISSION
(APPROVES OR
DENIES PROJECT)
INTERIOR REMODELS, MINOR ELECTRICAL, MECHANICAL, OR PLUMBING PERMITS
STAFF USE ONLY:
POOLS 9
DEPARTMENT
BUILDING AND
SAFETY
CONSTRUCT
ION
Date Received
Date of
ACTOR'Meeting
ACTION
APPLICANT NOTIFIED
Staff
DRB
P.C.
C.C.
Department of Environmental Services Form 1
CITY OF PALM DESERT
APPLICATION FORM
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD PROCESS
Design Review of:
/Q
CASE NO.
Agreement of compliance to be signed by those applying for review.
I hereby acknowledge that I have read and agree, to comply
with all the following requirements, and understand that
the Department of Building and Safety will not issue a
building permit or allow occupancy on the use permitted
until this signed confirmation has been received by the
Department of Environmental Services.
The development of this project shall conform substantially
to all development plans submitted in behalf of this case,
and as revised according to the Design Review Board process.
Any minor change requires approval by the Director of Envi-
ronmental Services. Any substantial change requires ap-
proval by the Design Review Board.
All requirements of any law, ordinance, or regulation of
the State, City, and any other applicable government entity
shall be complied with as part of the development process.
This approval is applicable, subject to the development of
this project, commencing within one year from approval date
and being promptly completed.
Landscaping (with irrigation system) shall be installed
prior to final inspection and receiving certificate of
occupancy.
Curb, gutter, curb cuts, and tie-in paving shall be provided
along the full frontage of the lot by means of installation
prior to final inspection or other provisions as approved by
the City Engineer. Construction shall conform to City Stan-
dards and all requirements of the City Engineer.
01dam' nQ
(Signature), 1 ate
Department of Environmental Services Form 1
richard a holden
a.i.a.
comprehensive
architectural
services
714/346-5088
box 905
palm desert
california
92260
December 2, 1977
MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS FOR STEWART CONDOMINIUMS
IN PALM DESERT
Re: Elevations:
Roofs:
Flashed clay spanish tile "Teja Grande" by .Sang:!
Valle Kilns.
Wood Facias and Trims:
Re -sawn douglas-fir finish with Olympic stain -
"New Bark".
Wood Siding:
Rough sawn cedar finish with Olympic #716 "natural
color".
PLASTER:
Spanish texture by "La Habra" products, color to
be X-45-Ash.
Sincerely,
V /
�Y
/4 a
0
�0 0
/ y0
/9 0� /3
Al-3r
/3 a\ c
y/ 20 y"p
.ri
O '` 9
J� �" •� � 1/ X
/6 ado
J
o •.�
2 /
7 95 0° r
\ � g
/9(3) %
V Q oy
e
cry • o - v
0
"o B 2/ O ,7 ry 2 n . i.,,-.
21
283 /o
o
_I
4 ,
p /O
/o /
H-3
_v
Ac l 22 O \"o o /0 �� �+ 4
\p 23
"p O -..
5 � �
(DI
I 5 0
3o Zg .� h "y
7 23 a 3,
M.B. 2//50 54 Palm Desert
MB. 2//B/ 84 Po/m Desert un# no. 3
,s
e
•�s
M
o J
ASSESSOR'S MAP 8K. 627 PG
R/VERS/DE COUNTY, CALIF
Lu
�t
$q&ft t �P OVOP A0 ��
C., P
?LANTING SP£CIFICATICNS
I. Soil Preparation
Remove all existing weeds from site. Remove all rocks larger than
2" in diameter unless they are.6" or more below grade. Apply
nitrolized redwood sawdust at a rate of 5 cubic yards per 1000
sq. ft. and 10 lbs. commercial fertilizer per 1000 sq. ft. Fine
grade site as per plans.
2. Ground Cover
Plant all ground covers as indicated on plans.
All areas designated as lawn shall be seeded with a broadcast
type spreader delivering an even distribution of seed.
Initial application of seed shall be annual Rye applied at a
rate of 500 lbs. per acre. After the seed has been distributed
evenly, apply Kellogg's Topper over the seed as a protective
coating. Then, immediately following the seeding process, a
light coating of water shall be applied evenly and consistently
during the germination period.
30 days after initial seeding, contractor shall reseed all bare
spots. The reseeding process shall be the same as above.
3. Shrubs
?lant all shrubs as indicated on plans.
All shrubs shall receive "Agriform" plant tablets at the following
rate: 1 tablet per 1 gallon shrub, 2 tablets per 5 gallon shrub
and 4 tablets per 15 gallon shrub, 6 tablets per 24" box shrub.
Landscape Designer reserves any right to refuse any plant material
which does not meet industry standards.
k
.94PttN11* I114afLl _
C;W 6)0i'✓L-dN)
4. Trees
Plant all trees as indicated on plans.
All trees shall receive "Agriform" plant tablets at the following
rate: 5 tablets per 15 gallon tree, 7 tablets per 24" box, and
10 per 36" box or larger.
All 15 gallon trees shall be staked with one (1) 2" x 8' lodgepole,
staked on the windward side of the tree and tied with two (2)
"cinch -ties" or equal. All boxed trees shall be triple -guyed with
16 gauge wire. 1" x 2" x 12" redwood stakes shall be placed in a
triangular pattern around.the tree. Attach the wires so as to
form a 45 degree angle with the ground. Attach red flags midway
up the wires as an accident prevention devise.
Landscape Designer reserves any right to refuse any trees which
do not meet industry standards.
5. Guarantee
All shrubs and ground cover shall be guaranteed to live and grow
for a period of 60 days after installation. Trees shall be
guaranteed for one year. Any material that fails to grow through
the specified guarantee period shall be replaced by the Contractor
at no cost to the Owner.
l y fe�►�!'� .
L;�v�anl r��.a►�t�
Triple -Guying Detail
•
vo�14A rp
P.A;r 4loL.�, p14-1AOr'l
,ne
lau
-e
in
id,ocd
Single Staking Detail
inch -ties
"4 x 8' lodgepole
n windward side
)rm basin
N
N
a
co
Q 1:T
0
N
N
a
z
o
LL
0� Q
U
W LU
w
�.+"'
w
V �
"Ca
Ui
o=
m
z
0
J
J
o
N
O
Q � �
0
w
cc
0
® -
11 m 0
F
w -
I LL
in 0