Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout111MF AMERICAN WEST64-144 kt^- 3�-v- cGG/ es 3�6.8To�. 444 t t � ©l2 - Lag 7 �/ L o r 3 o.f •� � 7 3- 0 9v .ono X / *-)3 73-2.8o X i 3 cs -'2 70 x ✓ i o 9 GPI- �_, fi, 7 3` 39l1 rl.'— CITY OF PALM DESERT BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPT. I; 'SP$CTION ; JSQV SST DATE Y C) TIME CC C)- 7 ns— BY�� ASSIGNED TO ADDRESS f O� �"`" ' "'�' i0 P--"'-'a"L UNIT or SPACE CALLED BY 0 POOL Grading _ Trench MOBILE HOME Steel Post Holes Q FENCE / WALL Bond Boom Grout Q SPECIAL Roof Nod Frame Q BUSINESS LIC. Insulation Plaster 'PLANNING Loth l Loth Q SIGN Final x Q OTHER PERRIT NO ' Temp Pole Grd. Waste U. Grd. Elec. Grd. Plbg. Bond Rgh Plbg. Rough Elea. --. Top Out Fihol Elea. - _ Sewer Hook Up M081LE HOME Cap Off Septic / drywe II Site Prep Gas Test Installation Final Plbg. Awning Porch /Vc U Grd. Mech. r Rgh. Mach. 6� Final Mech. --- . Y/Y INSTRUCTIONS MON. 7UE. WED. HU. FRI. A.M. P.M. 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-06I1 February 29, 1930 Mr. Larry Shields American West Development, Inc. P. 0. Box 2016 m F Palm Desert, California 92261 Dear Mr. Shields: I am enclosing fully executed copies of the Future Improvement Agreements relative to properties owned by you and commonly known as: 73-103 Santa Rosa Way Recorded No. 35595 73-381 Santa Rosa Way No. 35596 73-044 San Nicholas Street No. 35597 73-282 Catalina No. 35598 73-061 Catalina No. 35599 73-193 Catalina No. 35600 73-090 Guadalupe No. 35601 74-210 Goleta No. 35602 73-058 San Nicholas Street No. 35603 These Future Improvement Agreements have been officially recorded by the County of Riverside, and are now a part of your deeds to these properties. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, SHEILA R. GILLIGAN CITY CLERK SRG/dc Enclosures (as noted) 1. ClTY Oe p ,6103 Or, T:-.r, GOVT. CODE RESOLUTION NO. 77-60 Ili C7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE' STANDARD FUTURE IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENTS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY UPON THE REC0MMENDATION OF THE CITY ATTORNEY AND THE CITY ENGINEER The City Council of the City of Palm Desert, California, -- - --DOES HEREBY - RESOLVE —that -the Mayor is -authorized to execute on behalf of the City all Standard Future Improvement Agreements required by the City as a condition of building permits, development plans or other authorizations when such agreements are recommended by both the City Attorney and the City Engineer. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED on this 9th day of June , 1977, by the following vote, to wit: AYES NOES ABSENT ABSTAIN Brush, Newbrander, Wilson & Mullins None McPherson None EDWARD D. MULLINS, MAYOR ATTEST: SHEILA R. GILLIGAN, CJTY CLERK City of Palm Desert, California EACH DOCUMENT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICAiEIS ATTACHED, IS CERTIFIED TOEEAFU'_L,TRUE AND C.^,^,F;=CTCO?YGFT ic0k! iNAI_Ci1FILE AND ON Dated: SIiSiLA FIGi! Li`Cny Clcrk X City o Palm C t- tornia 'gal RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO CITY CLERK—`�---` City of Palm Desert P.O. Box 1977 alm Desert, California 92260 MAIL TAX BILL TO Owner Name on Line 7 at Address Named on Line 8 OWNER: Lot #87 Palma Village Unit #12 New Owners Muscal and Geisholt FOR THE BE" EFIT OF M CITY OF PALU DESERT NO FEE 6103 OF THE GOVT.. CODE Documentary Transfer Tax $ _Computed on Full Value Property Conveyed, Or Computed on Full Value Less Liens and Encumbrances Remaining at Time of Sale. Signature of Declarant or Firm Agent Determining Tax Name FUTURE IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT of 73-103 6a,6a "` „ay - .ate,.. "` u, ------ — ADDRESS: Ply Tkno 9nlr, Pal m Tln ar+r rnlifnrnia 92960 DATED: February 1, 1980 PARTIES: The parties to this agreement are the City of Palm Desert, a municipal corporation of the State of California, hereinafter referred to as CITY; and the person or persons mentioned on Line 7 of Page 1 hereof, hereinafter referred to as OWNER, without regard to number or gender. COVENANTS: It is mutually agreed by the parties hereto as follows: 1. CITY hereby approves the application for Building Permit subject to all applicable City Ordinances and regulations, on that certain real property, warranted by OWNER -to Tie wholly owned by him, described on Exhibit A, attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein. 2. CITY does hereby temporarily waive the requirement that OWNER install along the street frontage of said property those certain public improvements listed on Exhibit B, attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein. 3. Upon written demand therefor by CITY, addressed to OWNER at the address mentioned on Line 8 of Page 1 hereof, OWNER shall forthwith, at OWNER's sole cost and expense, prepare plans and specifications, approved by CITY, for the construction 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 27 28 29 30 31 32 T in in M 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 property, and shall then forthwith construct said public improvements according to said plans and specifications, to the approval of CITY. The demand by CITY mentioned in this paragraph may, at CITY's sole discretion, demand said work as to all said improvements on all said property, or -as—to-any-portion—thereof, and the failure by CITY to demand said work as to any of said improvements shall not constitute a waiver by CITY of its continuing right to demand such work in the future. 4. In the event title to said property or a part thereof is sold,' the herein stated obligation shall automatically also become the obligation of the new owner. 5. In the event OWNER fails to act as required in paragraph 3 above, after written demand therefor by CITY, CITY may perform OWNER's said obligations and OWNER shall upon written demand therefor, reimburse to CITY its costs therefor. 6. This agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the heirs, successors, assigns, and successors in interest in said real property, shall run with said real property, and shall create an equitable servitude upon said real property. 7. In the event CITY may be required to enforce this agreement in any respect, OWNER shall pay to CITY the sums expended by CITY for such enforcement proceedings, including attorneys fees and court costs. CITY OF PALM DESERT, A Municipal Corpord6ion of the State of California M STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ss. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) On this Y a of V in the yeary�� before me Notary Public in and for -2- Ll n Lo 'rj 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 OA the State, personally appeared known to me to be Mayor of the City of Palm Desert, California, and known to me to be the person who executed the within instrument on behalf of said public corporation, agency or political subdivision, and acknowledged to me that such City of Palm Desert, California executed the same. WITNESS my hand fficial seal.'--"`orrtc At E IN �;� RNe2F1 C ';Iry Signatur if fly Comids cn E pues Dec 3. 1500 — 0 NLel OWNER STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ss. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) On , before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in an or said tate, personally appeared known to me to be the person s whose name/3 is are subscribed to the within instrument and WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature ame Type or Printed Approved as to form: TO 1945 C. 10-141 TITLE INSURANCE (Corporation) Oro AND TRUST STATE OF CALIFORNIA SS. AT COR COMMNY COUNTY OP RivarcidP I 11i On February. 5 1980 before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said 0% i State, personally appeared LARRY SHIELDS known to me to be the President, and XXXX known to me to be Secretary of the corporation that executed the within Instrument, known to me to be the persons who executed the within Instrument on behalf of the corporation therein named, and a acknowledged to me that such corporation executed the OFFICIAL SE ,L I't tthin instrument pursuant to its by-laws or a resolution of _., r L: K Ir 2(N C. HAY S I i[ card of directors. � 1 N07ARY PU6LIC - CaLIFORNIA I WI ESS my hand and official seal. �' RiVE :SIDE CCU`JTY Idy Caron. c:^ti_5 MV 25, 1'J0 ` 3 � _ Signature 9 4 C7 V7 c7 EXHIBIT A Legal Description Lot #87 Palm Village Unit 12 Commonly known as: 73-103 Santa Rosa Way Palm Deserts California 92260 EXHIBIT B 1. Grading and paving of adjacent right-of-way to its centerline except that portion improved to City Standards. 2. Construction of P.C.C. curb, gutter and tie-in paving abutting all street frontages of property. All construction shall conform to City Standards at time the work is done. OWNER p LI Of , � 61 � �V 0� Q O CM au rc 0 S< p m a yc P P W ds w VLU 6 Y cc 4 1 HOUSE ?LAMS An HOOF COLS :is E:TT'.iiSOA ?AIV.V'. des t'CAW EX9'F,8 N PAIN[ _ ob Adobe Gold �y� y T • ' an Cold 1 GdCa7 ...r, -p- FA -1 Tian lied 17? A Gold White y� t,* V Whi to ded 132. C.tr� . B Tan Whi to 113 y Adobe Gold 134 —�".",,�,/,�" i Cream _. Gold i3 -A- R - f Whi to tied 152 -r'- D 1- man eyed 153 C.e++r. &- "t White Gold 180 Col yp . white Green 181 Cey� - `f Send White 211 B Adobe Whit* 239 s White White 252 A Adobe Gold 315 G}-i Whits issVi Minutes Design Review Board April 4, 1978 Page Two 5. Case No. 115MF - CHARLES KRUG - Preliminary site, floor and elevations for a duplex to be located on the west side of Monterey, south of 44th Avenue. Applicant present. Following discussion of this case the Board requested that the applicant restudy and/or redesign the front elevation and roof of the subject build- ing and resubmit the plans for consideration at the next Design Review Board meeting. On a motion by Urrutia, seconded by Hill, the Board moved to continue this case until April 25, 1978. Carried 4-0 (Urrutia, Hill, Leung, Jackson). 6. Case No. 116MF - AMERICAN WEST DEVELOPMENT - Preliminary site, floor and elevations for a triplex to be located at the northeast corner of Sunset and Driftwood. Applicant present. Following discussion of this case, the Board requested that the applicant restudy and/or redesign the west and south elevations of the structure and the roof treatment and resubmit the plans for consideration at the next Design Review Board meeting. On a motion by Urrutia, seconded by Jackson, the Board moved to continue this case until April 25, 1978. Carried 4-0 (Urrutia, Jackson, Leung, Hill). 7. Case No. 108MF - AMERICAN WEST DEVELOPMENT - Preliminary site, floor and elevations for a 5-unit apartment complex to be located at the southwest corner of Driftwood and Sunset. Applicant present. Folowing discussion of this case the Board requested that the applicant restudy and/or redesign the elevation and roof and eliminate the bars from Il windows and resubmit the plans for consideration at the next Design Review Board meeting. On a motion by Urrutia, seconded by Jackson, the Board moved to continue this case until April 25, 1978. Carried 4-0 (Urrutia, Jackson, Leung, Hill). 8. Case No. 111MF AMERICAN WEST DEVELOPMENT - Final construction drawings for 17 sin 1 - ily residences located on various lots in Palma Village Unit No. pplicant present. On a motion by Urrutia, seconded by Hill, the Board approved the final con- struction drawings subject to the following: a. Bars be removed from the windows on Plan 'A'. b. Stucco plant-ons be added as trim on Plan 'B'. c. More detailed landscaping plans be submitted for each unit with the pro- viso that no permits shall be issued until such plans have been approved. Carried 4-0 (Urrutia, Hill, Leung, Jackson). 9. On a motion by Urrutia, seconded by Jackson, the meeting was adjourned at 6:15 p.m.; carried 4-0 (Urrutia, Jackson, Leung, Hill). 4c RONALD R. KNIPPEL, Assistg4f Planner rk/ks a Gt:a�up ::F�I1nzra 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION REPORT Date REPORT ON: 17 single-family residences CASE NO.: 111MF ZONE: R-2(7) LOCATION: Palma Village Unit No. 12 APPLICANT: AMERICAN WEST DEVELOPMENT NATURE OF APPROVAL SOUGHT: Final construction drawings DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION: 1 7, 1978 After reviewing the submitted plans and the presentations by the staff and by the applicant, the DRB APPROVED this project, subject to the attached conditions. Date of Action: April 4, 1978 Motion Made By: Urrutia Seconded By: Hill Vote: 4-0 Reasons for Negative Vote (s): (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision.) STAFF COMMENTS: DESIGN REVIEW BOARD CASE NO.: APPLICANT LOCATION: 111 MF AMERICAN WEST DEVELOPMENT Palma Village Unit No. 12 ZONING: R-2(7 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: DATE: April 4, 1978 The applicant has complied with the conditions of approval. The landscaping plans should be more detailed. Staff would recommend approval of the final construction drawings with the stipulation that a detailed landscaping plan be sub- mitted for approval prior to the issuance of any building permits. SPECIAL CONDITIONS CASE NO. 111 MF 1. Plan 'A' shall be redesigned so that both windows on the front elevation are treated the same. 2. Plan 'B' front elevation shall be redesigned to eliminate wood treatment and replace it with concrete, slump block or stucco. 3. Plan 'C' shall be eleiminated and replaced with a Plan 'B'. 4. Plan 'E' shall be redesigned to eliminate the row of tile on the parapet. The parapet shall be rounded off above the arch and the windows modified. AGREEMENT I accept and agree, prior to use of this permit or approval, to comply with all the conditions set forth, and understand that the Department of Building and Safety will not issue a building permit or allow oc- cupancy on the use permitted until this signed confirmation has been received by the Department of Environmental Services. e) (Applicant's Signature) a ( tt:QCj o:ff IF)aI1rm 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION REPORT Date: February 23, 1978 REPORT ON: 17 Single -Family Residences CASE NO.: 111 MF ZONE: R-2(7) LOCATION: Palma Village Unit No. 12 APPLICANT: American West Development NATURE OF APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary site, floor and elevations DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION: After reviewing the submitted plans and the presentations by the staff and by the applicant, the DRB _ approvers this project, subject to the attached conditions. Date of Action: Fahriiary 71 1978 Motion Made By: Clarkson Seconded By: Williams Vote: 4-0 (lanng. la loon Min urn & Williams) Reasons for Negative (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City CZerk of the City of PaZm Desert within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision.) STAFF CO` .MENTS : To be placed on Planning Commission agenda for the meeting of February 28, 1978. SPECIAL CONDITIONS CASE NO. 111 MF 1. Plan 'A' shall be redesigned so that both windows on the front elevation are treated the same. 2. Plan W front elevation shall be redesigned to eliminate wood treatment and replace it with concrete, slump block or stucco. 3. Plan 'C' shall be eleiminated and replaced with a Plan W . 4. Plan 'E' shall be redesigned to eliminate the row of tile on the parapet. The parapet shall be rounded off above the arch and the windows modified. AGREEMENT I accept and agree, prior to use of this permit or approval, to comply with all the conditions set forth, and understand that the Department of Building and Safety will not issue a building permit or allow oc- cupancy on the use permitted until this signed confirmation has been received byt/h'- Department of Environmental (Services. //Date) ,(Applicant's Signature) 1-3pQ ag ***DESIGN REVIEW BOARD*** DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION .OfgWo,AA.d WC jkg4rLed.esE.v7- iArc Applicant ( please print) DE SE.BT 64 1— / 4 G z- Mailing Andress Telephone Rw is/ DOSE QT Ly.O.�iF City State Zip -Code REQUEST: (Describe specific nature of approval requested) S.F, 17/�ReeyAL F-OR 16 V/V /7'S• Vic — 211-. Z 59_ �C.oT/32-/33- SAVAJ uIGHOLAS Lo-T . 46 - P7- to 4/- /o 9 .5,igoil TA %Io'SA PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. EXISTING ZONING 7e.s Property Owner Authorization THE UNDERSIGNED STATES THAT THEY ARE THE OWNER IS) OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN AND HEREBY GIVE AUTHOR- IZATION FOR THE FILING OF THIS APPLICATION. �, �1u../�•- fJir/�& SIGNATURE VATE AGREEMENT ABSOLVING THE CITY OF PALM DESERT OF ALL LIABILITIES RELATIVE TO ANY DEED RESTRICTIONS. I DO BY MY SIGNATURE ON THIS AGREEMENT, ABSOLVE THE CITY OF PALM DESERT OF ALL LIABILITIES REGARDING ANY DEED RES- TRICTIONS THAT MAY BE APPLICABLE TO THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN. z..- 21/3/7f SIGNATURE GATE Applicant's Signature 1317 SIGNATURE DATE (FOR STAFF USE ONLY) ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS ACCEPTED 0�(/�/�(� y ❑ MINISTERIAL ACT E.A. No. • P ❑ CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION CASE No. _ Z ❑ NEGATIVE DECLARATION 0 OTHER REFERENCE CASE NO. The Design Review Board process is the method by which the City of Palm Desert reviews detailed design and construction plans prior to the issuance of a building permit. FENCES, POOLS d DEPARTMENT DESIGN ( PLANNING OF ENVIRON- REVIEW I \ COMMISSION MENTAL BOARD L� (APPROVES OR SERVICES (ADVISORY) DENIES PROJECT) STAFF INTERIOR REMODELS, MINOR ELECTRICAL, MECHANICAL, OR PLUMBING PERMITS STAFF USE ONLY: DEPARTMENT BUILDING AND CONSTRUCT SAFETY ION Date Received Date of ACTOR Meeting ACTION APPLICANT NOTIFIED Staff ORB P.C. C.C. Department of Environmental Services Form 1 •, Design Review of: CITY OF PALM DESERT APPLICATION FORM DESIGN REVIEW BOARD PROCESS TYPE OF PROJECT APPLICANT CASE NO. Agreement of compliance to be signed by those applying for review. I hereby acknowledge that I have read and agree, to comply with all the following requirements, and understand that the Department of Building and Safety will not issue a building permit or allow occupancy on the use permitted until this signed confirmation has been received by the Department of Environmental Services. The development of this project shall conform substantially to all development plans submitted in behalf of this case, and as revised according to the Design Review Board process. Any minor change requires approval by the Director of Envi- ronmental Services. Any substantial change requires ap- proval by the Design Review Board. All requirements of any law, ordinance, or regulation of the State, City, and any other applicable government entity shall be complied with as part of the development process. This approval is applicable, subject to the development of this project, commencing within one year from approval date and being promptly completed. Landscaping (with irrigation system) shall be installed prior to final inspection and receiving certificate of occupancy. Curb, gutter, curb cuts, and tie-in paving shall be provided along the full frontage of the lot by means of installation prior to final inspection or other provisions as approved by the City Engineer. Construction shall conform to City Stan- dards and all requirements of the City Engineer. � 0/1Ze - ,(ignature) z/r 3/7P (Date) Department of Environmental Services Form 1 Minutes Palm Desert Planning Commission February 28, 1978 VIII. NEW BUSINESS Page Five A. Consideration to initiate prezoning proceedings for pro- posed City Annexation No. 5 Mr. Williams noted that a request had been received from the residents in this area to be annexed and these are the types of zoning that is proposed for the area if it is annexed. He noted that early study of zoning will alleviate a lot of future problems with regard to density, traffic, land use, etc. Chairman Berkey asked if this would allow the staff to make recommendations at the time of the public hearing. Mr. Williams noted this is the reasoning behind prezoning. On a motion by Commissioner Snyder, seconded by Commissioner Kelly, the Commission directed the Secretary to initiate proceedings by Planning Commission Resolution No. 340; carried unanimously (4-0). B. Consideration of determination of compliance to the General Plan of proposed City acquistion of various lots for the implementation of the College of the Desert Area Specific Plan. Mr. Williams noted that this is one of many implementations of the College of the Desert Area Specific Plan and that is just a procedural matter. On a motion by Commissioner Reading, seconded by Commissioner Snyder, the Commission determined that the proposed planned acquisi- tion will conform with the adopted General Plan and by Planning Com- mission Resolution No. 341, this determination will be forwarded to the City Council; carried unanimously (4-0). IX. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ITEMS A. Review of Cases acted on by the Design Review Board at their meeting of February 21, 1978. Mr. Cipriani reviewed the cases noting that Case No. 73C was an old project with a new presentation. The project to be located next to Sunshine Meat, Fish & Liquor. The Design Review Board found no problems with the proposed project. Regarding Case No. 74C, the Design Review Board is requesting a sign program be submitted and noted that the interior circulation might create problems. Mr. Beebe noted that the alley is at an acute angle to E1 Paseo and he hopes that it will be realigned. . Cipriani reviewed Case No. 110MF and noted the suggestio r'—., hnson had made regarding the landscap- ing. Regarding Case N 111MF, r. Cipriani noted that the Design Review Board had selec d 4 o elevations to be used and had requested that the landscaping be improved. On a motion by Commissioner Kelly, seconded by Commissioner Reading, the Commission approved the actions of the Design Review Board by Planning Commission Resolution No. 342; carried unanimously (4-0). X. DISCUSSION ITEMS Mr. Charles Martin addressed the Commission regarding Section 30. Chairman Berkey informed him that it was the #1 priority for the advanced planning program for 1978-80. Mr. Martin asked if there would be a moratorium on this area during the study. Mr. Williams indicated that there would be none and that there should be no problem getting building permits during the study. 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE March 2, 1978 APPLICANT American West Development P. 0. Box 2016 Palm Desert, CA 92260 CASE NO.: 111MF The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of Feb. 28, 1978 CONTINUED TO DENIED XX APPROVED BY PLANNING COP24ISSION RESOLUTION NO. 342 PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF CONCURRENCE WITH THE PLANNING CO�LMISSION DECISION. PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF PUBLIC HEARING. Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Environmental Services, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. PAUL A. WILLIAMS, SECRETARY PALM DESERT PLAI%NTING CO?:�tISSSION cc: Applicant C.V.C.W.D. File SPECIAL CONDITIO: S CASE NO. 111 NF I. Plan 'A' shall be redesigned so that both windows on the front elevation are treated the same. 2. Plan W front elevation shall be redesigned to eliminate viood treatment and replace it with concrete, slump block or stucco. 3. Plan 'C' shall be eleiminated and replaced with a Plan 'F' 4. Plan_'E' shall be redesigned to eliminate the row of tile on the parapet. The parapet shall be rounded off above the arch and the windows modified. AGREEMENT I accept and agree, prior to use of this permit or approval, to comply with all the conditions set forth, and understand that the Department of Building and Safety will not issue a building permit or allow oc- cupancy on the use permitted until this signed. confirmation has been received by the Department of Environmental Services. (Date) (Applicant's Signature) PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 342 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, ANNOUNCING FINDINGS AND APPROVING THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTIONS OF FEBRUARY 21, 1978. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did review the Design Review Board actions of February 21, 1978, approving: Case No. 110MF - Request for approval of preliminary site, floor and elevations for a 12 unit apart- ment complex for ROBERT H. RICCIARDI; Case No. 73C - Request for approval of preliminary site, floor and elevations for a commercial struc- ture for BARBATTI and JOHNSON; Case No. 74C - Request for approval of preliminary site, floor and elevations for a commercial struc- ture for GLANZ and JOHNSON; Case N . 111MF - Request for approval of preliminary site, floor and elevations for 17 single-family residences for AMERICAN WEST DEVELOPMENT; WHEREAS, at this time, upon considering and receiving all testi- mony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said Commission did find sufficient facts and reasons to exist to approve the Design Review Board actions of February 21, 1978. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert Planning Commission held on this 28th day of February, 1978, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: BERKEY, KELLY, READING, SNYDER NOES: NONE ABSENT: KRYDER ABSTAIN: NONE GEORGE BERKEY, Chairman ATTEST: PAUL A. WILLIAMS, Secretary /ks