Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout115MF CHARLES KRUG LTD�4 i SP--CIAL CONDITIO::S CASE NO. 115MF 1. Front yard setback shall be 35 feet in order to modify the driveway so as to enable motorists to leave the site in a forward direction. 2. A more detailed and upgraded landscaping plan shall be sub- mitted at time of submittal of final construction drawings. 3. Roofing material shall be red mission tile, exclusively. 4. Parking space back up areas shall be reduced by 3 feet and landscaping provided. 5. A six foot high masonry shall be provided around the perimeter of the rear yard. • 6. The angle of the mansard roof shallnexceed 30°. 7. Evergreen or pear trees shall be utilitzed in place of those indicated on the exhibit. 8. Island area shall be landscaped with a group of palm trees, 6 fr., 8 ft., and 10 ft. in height 9. Trees indicated shall be increased in size. AGREEMENT 9 I accept and agree, prior to use of this -permit or approval, to comply with all the conditions set forth, and understand that the Department ! Of Building and Safety will not issue abu oc- cupancy on the use permitted until this ined lding permit or allow been received by the Department of EnvironmentalServirmation has beences (Date) (Applicant's Signature) 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE May 3, 1978 APPLICANT CHARLES KRUG P. 0. Box 3533 Orange, CA 92665 CASE NO.: 115MF The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of May 2 1978 CONTINUED DENIED XX APPROVED BY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 355 PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF FOR CONCURRENCE WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION. PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF FOR PUBLIC HEARING. Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Environmental Services, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. cc: Applicant C.V.C.W.D. File PAUL A. WILLIAMS, SECRETARY PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSSION Minutes Palm Desert Planning Commission May 2, 1978 Page Three VII. OLD BUSINESS A. Resolution 78-37; a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Palm Desert, California, establishing a priorities list of Future Studies for the 1978-80 Advanced Planning Program and directing Staff to develop a tentative work program. Mr. Williams noted that a work schedule had been started for Item 1 and that a bus tour would be conducted May 20 to cover Item 2. Resolution was received and filed by the Commission. B. Resolution 78-36; a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Palm Desert, California, establishing procedures to be followed when the Planning Commis- sion and Staff have differing opinions regarding specific proposals. Mr. Williams noted some of the points of the Resolution and stated that the Resolution would be filed and implemented. The Resolution was received and filed by the Commission. VIII. NEW BUSINESS - None IX. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ITEMS A. Review of Cases acted on by the Design Review Board at their meeting of April 25, 1978. Mr. Cipriani reviewe ases noting the Design Review Boards concerns with Case N 9. 115M . Mr. Lee Martinez representing the applicant stated that he n agreement and would comply with the conditions; Case No. 79C, he noted the conditions and showed a color rendering of the project; Case No. 119MF, the Commission re- quested that it be stated that the landscaping plan would be subject to Design Review Board review, the Resolution was changed to reflect this; and Case No. 61MF, there was no discussion. On a motion by Commissioner Kelly, seconded by Commissioner Kryder, the Commission approved the actions of the Design Review Board by revised Planning Commission Resolution No. 355; carried unanimously. X. DISCUSSION ITEMS - None XI. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS CHUCK LUENSMANN, resident of Portola Del Sol, asked the Commission a few questions: 1) Why is one project approved with the condition that a fire station be put in but another project approved without this condition? - It was explained that the fire station in question is much needed in the area that is proposed for and the project that is being asked to participate its creation is creating the need for said fire station. 2) Is the fire station volun- teer or fully manned? - He was informed that the station is fully manned by the Riverside County Fire Department, but there are also volunteer fireman needed. The Commission also advised Mr. Luensmann to attend a City Council meeting regarding questions pertaining to other fire stations being proposed. Minutes Design Review Board April 25, 1978 Page Two 6. Case No. 99MF - SUNRISE COMPANY - Final construction drawings for clubhouses for 780-unit condominium project to be located north of the Whitewater Storm Channel between Portola and Monterey. Applicant not present. On a motion by Urrutia, seconed by Jackson, the Board approved the final con- struction drawings. Carried 4-0 (Urrutia, Jackson, Minturn, Johnson). 7. Case No. 89MF - JOSEPH MUSTASCIO - Final construction drawings for a duplex to be located on the south side of Catalina, between San Rafael and San Carlos. Applicant not present. On a motion by Urrutia, seconded by Minturn, the Board approved the final construction drawings subject to the applicant providing an automatic sprink- ling system. A drip system was recommended as an alternate system for land- scaping around the structure; carried 4-0 (Urrutia, Minturn, Jackson, Johnson). 8. Case No. 90MF - JOSEPH MUTASCIO - Final construction drawings for a duplex to be located on the west side of Monterey between San Nicholas and Santa Rosa. Applicantnot present. On a motion by Urrutia, seconded by Minturn, the Board approved the final con- struction drawings subject to the applicant providing an automatic sprinkling system. An alternate drip sprinkling system for landscaping around the struc- ture was recommended. Carried 4-0 (Urrutia, Minturn, Jackson, Johnson). 9. Case No. 91MF - C. G. DUNHAM - Final construction drawings for a 20-unit con- dominium project to be located on the north side of Shadow Mountain, west of Lupine. Applicant present. On a motion by Minturn, seconded by Jackson, the Board approved the final con- struction drawings subject to the following: a. Modify carport and roof treatment as shown on Exhibit A. b. Roof tile shall be same as used on Phase I. c. Revise landscaping plan to include: 1. Grading plan 2. Use 2' to 3' berm along Shadow Mountain 3. Increase size of trees 4. Resubmit landscaping plan prior to issuing permits. Carried 4-0 (Minturn, Jackson, Urrutia, Johnson). 10. Case No. 79C - C. G. DUNHAM - Preliminary site, floor and elevations for a com- mercial project to be located on the south side of E1 Paseo between Lupine Lane and Sun Lodge. Applicant present. 11 On a motion by Minturn, seconded by Jackson, the Board approved the preliminary site, floor and elevation subject to the applicants compliance with special conditions 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10. Carried 4-0 (Minturn, Jackson, Urrutia, Johnson). Case No. 115MF - C RLES KRUG - Preliminary site, floor and elevations for a dupl to be locat on the west side of Monterey, south of 44th Avenue. Applican On a motion by Minturn, seconded by Jackson, the Board agreed to accept the pre- liminary plans as final construction drawings subject to staff's approval of the following conditions to be complied with by the applicant: a. Reduce parking space back-up areas by 3 feet and provide landscaping. b. Provide a 6 foot high wall around 3 sides of building and structural land- scaping. I Minutes Design Review Board April 25, 1978 Page Three 11. Case No. 115MF (Cont.) c. Revise landscaping plan to include the following: 1. Use evergreen or pear tree in place of those indicated. 2. Landscape island area with grouping of three palms 6', 8' and 10' in height. 3. Increase size of trees. d. Provide a Wangle on mansard roof. Carried 4-0 (Minturn, Jackson, Urrutia, Johnson). 12. Case No. 118MF - TRANSCOPIC DEVELOPMENT CORP. - Preliminary site, floor and elevations for an 80-unit condominium project to be located at the northwest corner of 44th Avenue and Cook Street. Applicant present. On a motion by Jackson, seconded by Urrutia, the Board approved the preliminary site, floor and elevations subject to the applicant utilizing vertical panels on the garage doors for Plan No. 2 and removing flowering trees from pool area. Carried 4-0 (Jackson, Urrutia, Minturn, Johnson). 13. Case No. 119MF - JAMES W. CLAUSE - Preliminary site, floor and elevations and final construction drawings for a duplex to be located at the northwest corner of Grapevine and Ryway. Applicant not present. On a motion by Minturn, seconded by Urrutia, the Board approved the preliminary site, floor and elevations and final construction drawings subject to the fol- lowing: a. Rework landscaping plan to include: 1. Mounding along street 2. More plantings 3. Larger trees 4. Decrease gravel areas b. Garden wall shall be same color as accent material. c. Allow ;" to 1' pitch on roof for drainage. Carried 4-0 (Minturn, Urrutia, Jackson, Johnson). 14. Case No. 61MF - 0. M. HOMME - One year time extension on the approval of this case to the Planning Commission. Project is a duplex to be located at the north- east corner of Pitahaya and Shadow Mountain Drive. Applicant not present. On a motion by Urrutia, seconded by Jackson, the Board approvedthe one year time extension on the approval of this case to the Planning Commission. Carried 4-0 (Urrutia, Jackson, Minturn, Johnson). 15. Case No. 113MF - MCBAIL COMPANY - VTN - Preliminary site, floor, and elevations for 101 single-family homes to be located at the southeast corner of Monterey and Country Club Drive. Applicant present. On a motion by Minturn, seconded by Jackson, the Board approved the preliminary site, floor, and elevations subject to the applicant complying with the follow- ing: a. Revise landscaping plan to: 1. Provide additional buffering for blowsand protection along Monterey Avenue. Recommend a wall plus a double row of plantings on either side of wall. Minutes Design Review Board April 25, 1978 Page Three 11. Case No. 115MF (Cont.) c. Revise landscaping plan to include the following: 1. Use evergreen or pear tree in place of those indicated. 2. Landscape island area with grouping of three palms 6', 8' and 10' in height. 3. Increase size of trees. d. Provide a 30°angle on mansard roof. Carried 4-0 (Minturn, Jackson, Urrutia, Johnson). 12. Caseaof - RANSCOPIC DEVELOPMENT CORP. - Preliminary site, floor and elev80-unit condominium project to be located at the northwest cornAvenue and Cook Street. Applicant present. On a motion by Jackson, seconded by Urrutia, the Board approved the preliminary site, floor and elevations subject to the applicant utilizing vertical panels on the garage doors for Plan No. 2 and removing flowering trees from pool area. Carried 4-0 (Jackson, Urrutia, Minturn, Johnson). 13. Case No. 119MF - JAMES W. CLAUSE - Preliminary site, floor and elevations and final construction drawings for a duplex to be located at the northwest corner of Grapevine and Ryway. Applicant not present. On a motion by Minturn, seconded by Urrutia, the Board approvedthe preliminary site, floor and elevations and final construction drawings subject to the fol- lowing: a. Rework landscaping plan to include: 1. Mounding along street 2. More plantings 3. Larger trees 4. Decrease gravel areas b. Garden wall shall be same color as accent material. c. Allow ," to 1' pitch on roof for drainage. Carried 4-0 (Minturn, Urrutia, Jackson, Johnson). 14. Case No. 61MF - 0. M. HOMME - One year time extension on the approval of this case to the Planning Commission. Project is a duplex to be located at the north- east corner of Pitahaya and Shadow Mountain Drive. Applicant not present. On a motion by Urrutia, seconded by Jackson, the Board approvEdthe one year time extension on the approval of this case to the Planning Commission. Carried 4-0 (Urrutia, Jackson, Minturn, Johnson). 15. Case No. 113MF - MCBAIL COMPANY - VTN - Preliminary site, floor, and elevations for 101 single-family homes to be located at the southeast corner of Monterey and Country Club Drive. Applicant present. On a motion by Minturn, seconded by Jackson, the Board approved the preliminary site, floor, and elevations subject to the applicant complying with the follow- ing: a. Revise landscaping plan to: 1. Provide additional buffering for blowsand protection along Monterey Avenue. Recommend a wall plus a double row of plantings on either side of wall. Minutes Design Review Board April 25, 1978 Page Three 11. Case No. 115MF (Cont.) c. Revise landscaping plan to include the following: 1. Use evergreen or pear tree in place of those indicated. 2. Landscape island area with grouping of three palms 6', 8' and 10' in height. 3. Increase size of trees. d. Provide a 30°angle on mansard roof. Carried 4-0 (Minturn, Jackson, Urrutia, Johnson). 12. Case No. 118MF - TRANSCOPIC DEVELOPMENT CORP. - Preliminary site, floor and elevations for an 80-unit condominium project to be located at the northwest corner of 44th Avenue and Cook Street. Applicant present. On a motion by Jackson, seconded by Urrutia, the Board approved the preliminary site, floor and elevations subject to the applicant utilizing vertical panels on the garage doors for Plan No. 2 and removing flowering trees from pool area. Carried 4-0 (Jackson, Urrutia, Minturn, Johnson). 13. Case N 1 99MF - AMES W. CLAUSE - Preliminary site, floor and elevations and final construct' n drawings for a duplex to be located at the northwest corner of Gr evine d Ryway. Applicant not present. On a motion by Minturn, seconded by Urrutia, the Board approvedthe preliminary site, floor and elevations and final construction drawings subject to the fol- lowing: a. Rework landscaping plan to include: 1. Mounding along street 2. More plantings 3. Larger trees 4. Decrease gravel areas b. Garden wall shall be same color as accent material. c. Allow ;" to l' pitch on roof for drainage. Carried 4-0 (Minturn, Urrutia, Jackson, Johnson). 14. Case No. 61MF - 0. M. HOMME - One year time extension on the approval of this case to the Planning Commission. Project is a duplex to be located at the north- east corner of Pitahaya and Shadow Mountain Drive. Applicant not present. On a motion by Urrutia, seconded by Jackson, the Board approveithe one year time extension on the approval of this case to the Planning Commission. Carried 4-0 (Urrutia, Jackson, Minturn, Johnson). 15. Case No. 113MF - MCBAIL COMPANY - VTN - Preliminary site, floor, and elevations for 101 single-family homes to be located at the southeast corner of Monterey and Country Club Drive. Applicant present. On a motion by Minturn, seconded by Jackson, the Board approved the preliminary site, floor, and elevations subject to the applicant complying with the follow- ing: a. Revise landscaping plan to: 1. Provide additional buffering for blowsand protection along Monterey Avenue. Recommend a wall plus a double row of plantings on either side of wall. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 355 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, ANNOUNCING FINDINGS AND APPROVING THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTIONS OF APRIL 25, 1978. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did review the Design Review Board actions of April 25, 1978, approving: i Case No. 79C - Request for approval of preliminary site, floor and elevations for a commercial pro- ject for C. G. DUNHAM; Case N . 115MF - Request for approval of preliminary site, floor and elevations and final construction drawings for a duplex for CHARLES KRUG; Case . 1 MF - Request for approval of preliminary site, floor and elevations and final construction drawings for a duplex for JAMES W. CLAUSE; Case No. 61MF - Request for approval of a one-year time extension on the approval of a duplex for 0. M. HOMME: WHEREAS, at this time, upon considering and receiving all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said Commission did find sufficient facts and reasons to exist to approve the Design Review Board actions of April 25, 1978. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and consti- tute the findings of the Commission in these cases; 2. That it does hereby approve the actions of the Design Re- view Board at their meeting of April 25, 1978,except for Case No. 119MF. 3. Case No. 119MF, Condition No. 4 shall include: subject to review by the Design Review Board prior to issuance of Building Permits. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission held on this 2nd day of May, 1978, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: BERKEY, KELLY, KRYDER, SNYDER NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE GEORGE BERKEY, Chairman ATTEST: i PAUL A. WILLIAMS, Secretary /ks J V" i SPECIAL COSDITIO:,S CASE No. 115NIF I. Front yard setback shall be 35 feet in order to modify the driveway so as to enable motorists to leave the site in a forward direction. 2. A more detailed and upgraded landscaping plan shall be sub- mitted at time of submittal of final construction drawings. 3. Roofing material shall be red mission tile, exclusively. 4. Parking space back up areas shall be reduced by 3 feet and landscaping provided. 5. A six foot high masonry shall be provided around the perimeter of the rear yard. 6. The angle of the mansard roof shall exceed 30 . 7. Evergreen or pear trees shall be utilitzed in place of those indicated. on the exhibit. 8. Island area shall be landscaped with a group of palm trees, 6 ft., 8 ft., and 10 ft. in height 9. Trees indicated shall be increased in size. AGREEMENT I accept and agree, prior to use of this permit or approval, to comply with all the conditions set forth, and understand that the Department of Building and safety will not issue a building permit or allow oc- cupancy on the use permitted until this signed confirmation has been received by the Department of Environmental Services. (Date) (applicant's Signature) Minutes Design Review Board April 4, 1978 Page Two 5. Case No. 115 - CHARLES KRUG - Preliminary site, floor and elevations for a duplex to be located on the west side of Monterey, south of 44th Avenue. Applicant present. Following discussion of this case the Board requested that the applicant restudy and/or redesign the front elevation and roof of the subject build- ing and resubmit the plans for consideration at the next Design Review Board meeting. On a motion by Urrutia, seconded by Hill, the Board moved to continue this case until April 25, 1978. Carried 4-0 (Urrutia, Hill, Leung, Jackson). 6. Case No. 116MF - AMERICAN WEST DEVELOPMENT - Preliminary site, floor and elevations for a triplex to be located at the northeast corner of Sunset and Driftwood. Applicant present. Following discussion of this case, the Board requestedthat the applicant restudy and/or redesign the west and south elevations of the structure and the roof treatment and resubmit the plans for consideration at the next Design Review Board meeting. On a motion by Urrutia, seconded by Jackson, the Board moved to continue this case until April 25, 1978. Carried 4-0 (Urrutia, Jackson, Leung, Hill). 7. Case No. 108MF - AMERICAN WEST DEVELOPMENT - Preliminary site, floor and elevations for a 5-unit apartment complex to be located at the southwest corner of Driftwood and Sunset. Applicant present. Folowing discussion of this case the Board requested that the applicant restudy and/or redesign the elevation and roof and eliminate the bars from windows and resubmit the plans for consideration at the next Design Review Board meeting. On a motion by Urrutia, seconded by Jackson, the Board moved to continue this case until April 25, 1978. Carried 4-0 (Urrutia, Jackson, Leung, Hill). 8. Case No. 111MF - AMERICAN WEST DEVELOPMENT - Final construction drawings for 17 single-family residences located on various lots in Palma Village Unit No. 12. Applicant present. On a motion by Urrutia, seconded by Hill, the Board approved the final con- struction drawings subject to the following: a. Bars be removed from the windows on Plan 'A'. b. Stucco plant-ons be added as trim on Plan 'B'. c. More detailed landscaping plans be submitted for each unit with the pro- viso that no permits shall be issued until such plans have been approved. Carried 4-0 (Urrutia, Hill, Leung, Jackson). 9. On a motion by Urrutia, seconded by Jackson, the meeting was adjourned at 6:15 p.m.; carried 4-0 (Urrutia, Jackson, Leung, Hill). RONALD R. KNIPPEL, AssisWrjff Planner rk/ks u (K:RtLc�� off :Y)aIn 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION REPORT Date: April 27, 1978 REPORT ON: Duplex CASE NO.: 115MF ZONE: R-2, S.P. LOCATION: West side of Monterey, south of 44th Avenue APPLICANT: CHARLES KRUG NATURE OF APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary site, floor and elevations DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION: After reviewing the submitted plans and the presentations by the staff and by the applicant, the DRB APPROVED this project, subject to the attached conditions. Date of Action Motion Made By Seconded By: Vote: April 25, 1978 Minturn Jackson 4-0 Reasons for Negative Vote (s): (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen (Z5) days of the date of the decision.) STAFF CONBIENTS : DESIGN REVIEW BOARD CASE NO.: APPLICANT LOCATION: ZONING: 115MF CHARLES KRUG DATE:April 25, 1978 West side of Monterey, south of 44th Ave. R-2. S.P. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff is uncertain that the proposed driveways will work effectively. If the Board feels that the proposed drive- ways meet their intent, Staff would recommend approval of the preliminary plans. N 1 2, 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. SPECIAL CONDITIONS CASE NO. 115MF Front yard setback shall be 35 feet in order to modify the driveway so as to enable motorists to leave the site in a forward direction. A more detailed and upgraded landscaping plan shall be sub- mitted at time of submittal of final construction drawings. Roofing material shall be red mission tile, exclusively. Parking space back up areas shall be reduced by 3 feet and landscaping provided. A six foot high masonry shall be provided around the perimeter of the rear yard. The angle of the mansard roof shall exceed 30 . Evergreen or pear trees shall be utilitzed in place of those indicated on the exhibit. Island area shall be landscaped with a group of palm trees, 6 ft., 8 ft., and 10 ft. in height Trees indicated shall be increased in size. AGREEMENT I accept and agree, prior to use of this permit or approval, to comply with all the conditions set forth, and understand that the Department of Building and Safety will not issue a building permit or allow oc- cupancy on the use permitted until this signed confirmation has been received by the Department of Environmental Services. (Date) (Applicant's Signature) REPORT ON 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 9226O TELEPHONE (T14) 346-0611 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION REPORT Duplex CASE NO.: 115MF � ., ZONE: R-2, S.P. LOCATION: West side of Monterey, south of 44th Avenue APPLICANT: CHARLES KRUG NATURE OF APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary site, floor and elevations DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION: After reviewing the submitted plans and the presentations by the staff and by the applicant, the DRB CONTINUED TO April 25, 1978 this project, subject to the attached conditions. Date of Action Motion Made By Seconded By: Vote: April 4, 1978 Urrutia Hill 4-0 Reasons for Negative Vote (s): (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City CZerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision.) STAFF COMMENTS: DESIGN REVIEW BOARD CASE NO.: 115 MF APPLICANT: CHARLES KRUG LOCATION: West side of Monter ZONING: R-2, S.P. DATE: April 4, 1978 south of 44th Avenue STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff is recommending that the structure be setback an additional 15' in order to eliminate the need to back out onto Monterey which is a situation the Board has had to deal with in the past. In addition, a more detailed landscaping plan is being required. The additional front yard should enable the applicant to include more plant materials. SPECIAL CONDITIONS CASE NO. 115MF 1. Front yard setback shall be 35 feet in order to modify the driveway so as to enable motorists to leave the site' in a forward direction. 2. A more detailed and upgraded landscaping plan shall be sub- mitted at time of submittal of final construction drawings. 3. Roofing material shall be red mission tile, exclusively. AGREEMENT I accept and agree, prior to use of this permit or approval, to comply with all the conditions set forth, and understand that the Department of Building and Safety will not issue a building permit or allow oc- cupancy on the use permitted until this signed confirmation has been received by the Department of Environmental Services. (Date) (Applicant's Signature) 12 P. on 9PO 5 R9 ***DESIGN REVIEW BOARD*** DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION Moiling Address State REQUEST: (Describe specific nature of approval requested) 60,vy,e U C_410w G7 buA LK PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: g3S= Oal Telephone Zip -Code /of 3 0f' �/A, U/,, /A L& /' /U0. / /,s° %rc ti!`rp d��cond�4 d'Colel ,,LoseR7- ASSESSOR S z$ G / k ti %i r OA_ 01A/11 ACO/gdC/.. p,e C�ryv.� Utz /c/ocerliVc PARCEL NO. 6ZgD1-13odV —Z EXISTING ZONING R- 2 Property Owner Authorization THE UNDERSIGNED STATES THAT THEY ARE THE OWNER IS) OF THE PROPERTY DESCRI8ED HEREIN AND HEREBY GIVE AUTHOR- IZALON--"R THE FILMti OPTIUS APPLICATION. AGREEMENT ABSOLVING THE CITY OF PALM DESERT OF ALL I DO BY MY SIGNATURE ON THIS AGREE Applicants Signature (FOR STAFF USE ONLY) ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS ❑ MINISTERIAL ACT E.A. No. E3 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION ❑ NEGATIVE DECLARATION ❑ OTHER .t,lAh S DATE IE TO ANY DEED RESTRICTIONS. THE CITY OF PALM DESERT OF ALL LIABILITIES REGARDING ANY DEED RES- THAT MAY BE APPLICABLE TO THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN. —� DATE vbj i8 DATE CASE No. //S M11 REFERENCE CASE NO ' r 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 922GO TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 A October 3, 1977 Mr. Gordon Smith p. 0. Box 1135 Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 Lot 3, Palma Village Unit #1 Re Dear Mr. Smith: The subject property, Lot 3, Palma Village Unit #1,The fde', signated R-2, S.P. on the Palm residentialesert ��devlelopment at S,p, zone permits single -story the earateof asedlonwcll'nthe resent lot snit for ize and subject to.com lot pliance to all other design requirements of the Zoning Ordinance, it ispossible at this time to construct a duplex on the property in question - Please don't.hesitate t0 call this office if you have any further questions. Vpq truly Yours, Paul A. Williams, Director Dept, of EnWonmental Services sf/ks 0 MW CITY OF PALM DESERT APPLICATION FORM DESIGN REVIEW BOARD PROCESS Design Review of: CASE NO. Agreement of compliance to be signed by those applying for review. I hereby acknowledge that I have read and agree, to comply with all the following requirements, and understand that the Department of Building and Safety will not issue a building permit or allow occupancy on the use permitted until this signed confirmation has been received by the Department of Environmental Services. The development of this project shall conform substantially to all development plans submitted in behalf of this case, and as revised according to the Design Review Board process. Any minor change requires approval by the Director of Envi- ronmental Services. Any substantial change requires ap- proval by the Design Review Board. All requirements of any law, ordinance, or regulation of the State, City, and any other applicable government entity shall be complied with as part of the development process. This approval is applicable, subject to the development of this project, commencing within one year from approval date and being promptly completed. Landscaping (with irrigation system) shall be installed prior to final inspection and receiving certificate of occupancy. Curb, gutter, curb cuts, and tie-in paving shall be provided along the full frontage of the lot by means of installation prior to final inspection or other provisions as approved by the City Engineer. Construction shall conform to City Stan- dards and all requirements of the City Engineer. ure A // S- 7 V (Date) Department of Environmental Services Form 1 N \ 2 roro Q V I I I I I I I I I \—__—__---__—/ s of 3AY jO /� �1s -- zo> .l3H31NOW J 7 5r Nw e ---------- I /'7 � ' ' , U . =-'-'-----------'------r'----� � � .. ---------' -H'