Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout124MF WARREN SLAUGHTER HILLSIDE ROADN (U�t�� c O IY)aZlnua 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE May 31, 1978 APPLICANT WARREN SLAUGHTER 46-191 Papago Circle Indian Wells, CA 92260 CASE NO.: CUP 03-78 and 124MF The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of CONTINUED TO 11-omwe7 XX APPROVED BY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 361 PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF FOR CONCURRENCE WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION. PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF FOR PUBLIC HEARING. Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Environmental Services, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. PAUL A. WILLIAMS, SECRETARY PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSSION cc: Applicant C.V.C.W.D. File 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION REPORT Date: May 31, 1978 REPORT ON: Hillside Lot Improvements CASE NO.: 124MF ZONE: R-E 43,560 H LOCATION: Central portion of Sec. 30, TSS, R6E, west of the Palm Valley Storm Channel APPLICANT: WARREN SLAUGHTER NATURE OF APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary Design Approval DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION: After reviewing the submitted plans and the presentations by the staff and by the applicant, the DRB APPROVED this project, subject to the attached conditions. Date of Action Motion Made By Seconded By: Vote: May 23, 1978 Urrutia Jackson 4-0 Reasons for Negative Vote (s): (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City CZerk of the City of PaZm Desert within fifteen (Z5) days of the date of the decision.) STAFF COMMENTS: a DESIGN REVIE4 30AAD DATE: May 23. 1978 CASE NO.: 12JMF APPLICANT: WARREN SLAUGHTER LOCATION: Central portion of Sec. 30, TSS, R6E, west of the Palm Valley Storm Channel ZONING: R-E 43,560 H STAFF REC0ILIENDATION: Forward any recommended conditions to the Planning Commission as Design Review conditions. Zvi, r DESIGN REVIE"" COARD CONDITIO`iS FOR —CASE -124,NIF AGREEMENT I accept and agree, prior to use of this permit or approval, to comply with all the conditions set forth, and understand that the Department of Building and Safety will not issue a building permit or allow• oc- cupancy on the use permitted until this signed confirmation has been received by the Department of Environmental Services. (Date) (Applicant's Signature) PLANNING CO.'IMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CONDITIONS -OF APPROVAL CASE NOS. CUP 03-15 y 12,111F Standard Conditions: 1. The development of this project shall conform substantially to all plans submitted in behalf of this case (Exhibit A), and as revised according to the Design Review Board process and/or Planning Commission action. Any minor changes require approval by the Director of Environmental Services. Any substantial change requires approval by the Planning Commission. 2. All requirements of any law, ordinance, or regulation of the State, City, and any other applicable government entity shall be complied with as a part of the development process. 3. This approval is applicable, subject to the development of this project, commencing within one year from approval date and being promptly completed. Special Conditions: 1. The proposed driveway extension and parking area construction shall be done in compliance with the City of Palm Desert Grading Ordinance No. 126. 2. Property drainage shall be obtained either through paved channels or the paving of the parking area and driveway so as to prevent erosion of the hillside. AGREEMENT I accept and agree, prior to use of this permit or approval, to comply with all the conditions set forth, and understand the Department of Building and Safety will not issue a building permit or allow occupancy on the use permitted until this signed confirmation has been received by the Department of Environmental Services. (Date) (Applicant's Signature) Minutes Palm Desert Planning May 30, 1978 Commission Page Eight VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS (Cont.) E. Case Nos. CUP 03-78 a( 124MF WARREN SLAUGHTER, Applicant Request for approval of Conditional Use Permit and Preliminary Design Review to allow the extension of an existing driveway, the creation of a pad for parking, the improvement of an existing driveway and a water line extension on a parcel located within the Hillside Overlay District. Mr. Williams reviewed the cases and noted on an aerial photo the area involved and proposed changes. He then reviewed the condi- tions of approval. Temporary Presiding Officer Snyder declared the Public Hearing open and asked if the applicant wished to speak at this time. WARREN SLAUGHTER, noted his agreement with the conditions. Temporary Presiding Officer Snyder asked if there was anyone wishing to speak in FAVOR or in OPPOSITION to the proposed project. Being none, he declared the Public Hearing closed and asked for the pleasure of the Commission. On a motion by Commissioner Kelly, seconded by Commissioner Kryder, the Commission approved Cases No. CUP 03-78 and 124MF by Planning Commission Resolution No. 361; carried unanimously (3-0). F. Case Nos. DP 08-78 and 125MF - ROGER BOYAR DEVELOPMENT, Applicant. Request for approval of a Development Plan Amendment and Preliminary Design Review to provide for a peri- meter wall and landscaped areas which would separate the existing phase of the Kings Point condominium project on Lot-1 and a portion of Lot 2 of the recorded tract from future development of the project. Mr. Williams reviewed the cases and the conditions of approval including the Design Review conditions. Temporary Presiding Officer Snyder declared the Public Hearing open and asked the applicant if he wished to speak at this time. STUART GREEN, noted his agreement with the conditions and stated he would answer any questions. Temporary Presiding Officer Snyder asked if there was anyone wishing to speak in FAVOR of the project. JAMES BURBON, lawyer representing the property owners, stated that an agreement had been reached between the applicant, the property owners and the residents of the present development and that he would like a few things clarified with regard to encroachment, the existing roadway being moved, the location of the wall in question, when will the wall go in and what type of wall it will be. Temporary Presiding Officer Snyder asked if there was anyone wishing to speak in OPPOSITION to the project. N 1. EXTEND EXISTING DRIVMVAY APROX. 150 ft. 2. CUT APROX. 12 ft. FOR PARKING AREA $. PARKING AREA APROX. 50 ft. by 50 ft. 4. PRESERVE CONTOUR OF HILL AS 14UGH AS .,r,,;41"ni_,4; 5. PLACE MATERIAL FROM CUT IN D�iF;iSSSED Ali&A SOUTHOF,ST OF CUT 0", CITY OF PALM DESERT DEPAROTMENT ENVIRONIJENTAL SERV EXmBIT N0. CASE NO-C o .Dw�'