The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About128MF CARL COX SILVER SPUR MOBILE MANORSILVER SPUR RESERVE dba SILVER SPUR MOBILE MANOR 50-001 HIGHWAY 74 PALM DESERT, CALIFORNL9 92260 PHONE (714) 346-4219 BRUCE E. BEDIG, Managing Partner ROBERT and BETTY TURNBULL, Managers March 9, 1979 Mr. Paul Williams City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, CA 92260 Dear Mr. Williams: This letter is to confirm my telephone conference with Mr. James Hill this date wherein it was discussed and agreed that the corner palm trees with appropriate lighting would be installed and operative within thirty (30) days from the date each mobilehome is installed at the new pads currently under development at Silver Spur Mobile Manor. Accordingly, this condition may not be met as of date of notice of completion and occupancy for each new mobilehome pad, but will be complied with within the time parameter set forth above. It is my hope that the job's civil engineer, general contractor, and landscape architect will continue to com- municate with both you and me so that practical agreements such as is the subject of this letter may be made to insure completion of the project at the earliest possible date. cc: Mr. Robert Turnbull Mr. Robert Saunders, Hallmark Engineering Mr. Dave Sing, Sing & Sons Mr. Michael Buccino Mr. James Hill, City of Palm Desert Very truly yours, SILVE SPUR RESERVE Bru a E. Be dig Managing Partner Ar7n Eh I'i:ror ��SERT�s V / ,. � —! r i c� ! r:.' V7i /-,'/ h .� j t✓ l� - i.',�` 4 i i . c .- ,� +,�.JZ•'N .IVAomddv Simi io On 3N0 mIN.LIM 33N3mmoo IIYNS NOLLonvisNoo r1a0:N01a3� 'e"a'a ` 83113i .JdYls 'ON's3a'3'3 f�] An C3AOHddV s33inaas 3 183S30 W-lVd =0 A110 Y ,c 0 T� ;7 171 i.v 0 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 May 1, 1979 Silver Spur Mobile Manor 50-001 Highway 74 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Attn: Robert Turnbull Re: Street Names for Silver Spur Mobile Manor Addition; Ref. 128 MF Dear Mr. Turnbull: The City of Palm Desert does hereby approve the attached street names for your Mobile Manor Addition. Please provide said names on the Final Map for recordation. Very truly yours, Paul A. Williams, AICP Director of Environmental Services lm/pw/ss Attachment cc: Lt. Renny, Riverside County Sheriff's Department Riverside County Road Dept., Indio and Riverside Offices Postal Service, Palm Desert Branch Dave Ortegel, Palm Desert Fire Marshal Clyde Beebe, Director of Public Works James Hill, Director of Building & Safety Coachella Valley County Water District Southern California Edison Company Southern California Gas Company General Telephone Company Chamber of Commerce ✓File SILVER SPUR MOBILE MANOR ADDITION CASE NO. 128 MF A. DESERT FERN LANE B. RUSTIC ROCK ROAD C. PAMPAS LANE s ,, I w 11 rypIcAt srl?EEr x. J- 50-001,YWY N PAL" OE5EV7 C4. 4W /007 SO,04Z R CANYON Ae PALM SR,911V", C.I. 4 .,, Ix \ , �� `,,� JI I• ! s 1 � � i �� esce �� y � I IIPwO✓f0-•�Gt 1.�� ` J EARTHWORK QUAIM .......... 0- AA PAVINO OLIAN)"I r. re. ld� /04Mp ORADIN6 -4,OeC/F/GA710NS `NN 110 SIL A0401TION , ro Z-j9 SiOM9 MOBIL E UMOR Cl;rY OF eALIW DFSEPr "Z11-OVNIA VICIVITV MAP DEPARTMENT OF FIRE PROTECTION IN COOPERATION WITH THE CAL I FORNIA DIVISION OF FORESTRY DAVID L. FLAKE COUNTY FIRE WARDEN May 11, 1979 Paul A. Williams Director of Fnvironmental Services City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 Subject: Street names - Silver Spur Mobile Manor P.O. BOX 248 210 WEST SAN JACINTO STREET PERRIS, CALIFORNIA 92370 TELEPHONE (714) 657-3183 We have no objection to the first choice for any of the proposed. We request that street C - second choice of "Quail Trail" not be considered. David J. Ortegel Fire Marshal DJO:dt RECEIVED MAY 141979 ENVIRONMENTAL SI:nV:CES CITY OF PALM DESERT ROAD DEPARTMENT W402 City of Palm Desert DATE ■ May 3. 1979 FROM: Warren R. Stallard Indio Office. Xalwt Street Names for Silver Spur Mobile Manor Addition. Thank -You for the opportunity to review the proposed street names for Silver Spur Mobile Manor Addition. We find no conflict with existing named County roads. WRS/kp GEN. FORM 4, 3/65 Warren R. Stallard. u C EI V E V 'RViC[S T CITY Of FA'-fvf Ui:SER 4=1 Ask SILVER SPUR RESERVE dba SILVER SPUR MOBILE MANOR 50-001 HIGHWAY 74 PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 PHONE (714) 346-4219 BRUCE E. BEDIG, Managing Partner ROBERT and BETTY TURNBULL, Managers Palm Desert City Hall Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, Ca. Att: Mr. Morgan, Planning Dept. Dear Mr. Morgan: April 6, 1979 The following are names we have chosen for our street in our new addition as per our recent telephone conversation: 1st choice - Quail Trail 2nd choice - Pampas Lane Please let us know if one of these is permissable. Thank you. RBT:bjt V,e%ry/J truly yours Q� Robert Turnbull Manager RECEIVED APR 9 1979 ENVIRONMENTAL, SERVICES CITY OF PALM OE:E" 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 April 18, 1979 To: All Interested Parties Subject: Street Names for Silver Spur Mobile Manor Addition The City of Palm Desert is currently considering the request for approval of street names for subject addition. Please review the attached map and list of names proposed for the subdivision to determine whether they are acceptable or should be modified. All comments should be returned to the Department of Environmental Services, P. 0. Box 1977, Palm Desert, California 92260, or call Mr. Lloyd Morgan at 714/346-0611, extension 51. Very truly yours, Paul A. Williams, AICP Director of Environmental Services lm/pw/ss cc: Lt. Renny, Riverside County Sheriffs Department Riverside County Road Dept., Indio and Riverside Offices Postal Service, Palm Desert Branch Dave Ortegel, Palm Desert Fire Marshal Clyde Beebe, Director of Public Works Coachella Valley County Water District Southern California Edison Southern California Gas General Telephone Chamber of Commerce James Hill, Director of Building & Safety File SILVER SPUR MOBILE MANOR ADDITION First Choice Second Choice A Desert Fern Lane Desert Cactus Lane B Rustic Rock Road Red Rock Road C Pampas Lane Quail Trail e(ViV A /N171A �r /, �/ 77d/Nd•O!/7rJ ld'3S30 W/Y�dd`/`�d0/!Ay'l/J A7 C �4//Ywu ;1�' � r4rr•.�YSY tw.W..yt4w«w /.rllvar+rw.w. .YMg7rw...,vr r J .M'+w�aJ/M.IY/�M✓�/.IMMMYM..IA'/Y�iGY'!'/�tfJ�O { ! .WYIIV M•«r «1. Ii.+•twl«M.s,ny. r,4«yjt `w'.YLMYIIi.r• f wiM t!«M 4><rLwMK r�I w,1 � w. r45wV.•«L 9 f 'f SYiO. u..lN /Ff S.Ls , 1 ...�. r... Mu'r•'W��tAf�V/4")f yYYV ✓+Yw/!K � -• .yrY Nr vrwy /KVf .ywyr� { li. dy.4t «vMIYYw Ivv+/ryYy.n�y4su MY/%><e ht XM • rr!nYl.J w/Kw/iulb �/ iM•w: .seYe rr •. wva../MY�e,'sy+� y iYK H«; A') r u4YK N m /� y«vK/• L teK riliw•Nw.b.•uh«r+s wuw. w..NY..r K•..a.w.lw•««i sI t /�' ' 'ANw. YrY•NI L se .•Y+v •:n a M'M..a i+•V«m• «'•"rw'40h+4v4 a�.t ....n. N.•y 7 �e. �Ywy,.w. wri s j !ij '•/ t SNO/LWJb/ 3 9N/OVN %'r PV MP tf OM'M"" 1Ninl1to 9C.L ' 59/L/lNdO rJN/tldd �. FM A79.t2 'NB/t. ,WrO4 611VIIII NHOMHINY3 i .T7v a 'T"•'«'f�i M.Y..-daT 00 N0,4ND1.7 /i'7de Of !00/ ON/ JN/,Y-77N19N7Jld&'wP&7�7rNq Y.J 2&W'JV Iy7re o� afaH soo.os �io3P 3.7ntreziy l % Y 01 NO/1la6v ry , It I �r I y tK..nprt ' ,. I 1 •�. Y �. n ♦.r. 1 , � n � ! i I I .��P 11 y� II +4r I 1 1 rY�{ •/ L. I• V '. .I ,\ I ! 1 .7NOH J7.6FOsy SBNfya-v NMt7NJ rrns «. asx w• .r•v. NO/1035 7d0/d (1 1332/1� 5� 1 .w.eo.f t4w� •1I� ,p{ . .`. r a. .. r. .. , . ¢.. • ter. _ ... _. ,.. al .l" 1M N 14.lY.y 1� -crN• r/a n..r w.• CrroN.'y lvLK.Mr TYPICAL STREET Yo xnf ..� y n i.w �• I • iy•i TYP/cAL 9EGT/GN A•A' AYMf ' IA'OlAN SfX'/•Y65 MOF;tF NOAIL' {>q.� t EX/ST./N4r, _ PARE TYo�AC SffT/ON NLnr!A's cANr •'7 M.P. B/P!/C£ AM6 SO-M/ NWY N PALM DESERT, to ENG/NEER ,(_ //ALL MARK ENG/NEER1NG, INC /007 SO PqL M CANYON OR - 'A - PALM SP911V6S• C4. a { h� fx61JJ;:av ................ J..)°0 CY 21:'5 LY w/7.I•...M/fK PtN••FKMMI �1 PAV/N6 OOANT1T/f.S A /�i. .. .... ii 1,..1. �+ GRAOIN6 SPEC/F1C47/ON5 •"]�+ •.,`.. /�l / •/••«rw/A.w./•.lbsMriW+w hn!w Y.../Kh0!Y Nf hM Ax•/4•/ l /.//w•hr.•/aWh t✓w7 hkbrs .yh•.M..v.rn A-N�SayM h#1.y, •t+F 'i a�%i�. ernM � /ryr.b h K+ rM as ti rbA.v/ wih. ✓. f Yef-r.••a//s.ra/•..J.a.w!✓.•iN. YwNJ•r••w MMOywv/r,.yA�a f/wy ./yrwh N pf M Ya1.'K w ! +W.'•w/YN'•+J M/MdAM(Mhw.H4ywt A Gwihcb :+Y/�YAaY .r.YYssa rW dr/o..w M/w.r DhM L. rr au..y,asl�Yw rrrh w. �..!p.hwi Mr1 ! Luhhlw-./wi A...M N/.iN f.1;/x/rnw•f W� r M w <wlwt �N fL.jdlM� fYr/CmuKLM.whW ia`••aY ell n«/ � Jr�h D.w. I rr11r.4Wr5M •Kwr•VYrw ♦♦A1rY•A�N� Y•sr.K �6r/1L../,iy 1 mw.Y !r M lih+. rM.tin'w•.W.K•nMY r.Alri.r!M Mrr vw� N Mh/r.' ! /hr(i//✓HMA'wrI )AY/rrl•1/N1rY/hr�r /!M s' 1Jnrl.eAr I AYewhy LY.YM. M•.O MPw.t'hdw/I IMYNM f✓imY..•yrWn//DN AM1AK/.••PYm w.d(f./nHA..+/,Y.wAYHr41M1lWNry'NMY!DP' N ADD/T/ON TO S/L 1/ER SPAR MOBIL E UMOR C/TY OF PALAil DESE.PT, CAL/FORN/A VICINITY MAP ;cw.• rAc nxl w.- c.x�.y.f,.efwf TYPICAL STREET .re ff4d e ,,, /' ✓a TYP/CAL SEOT/ON -A -A ---- ----k y lNOFAN FPRINCS Af0014 E HONE Pi Rk A . .. �E.ilST.%A'G. RAR.k' 50'00/ NWV 70 srv/ue sEtnav P41.MDE.SER7, CA. 'fa wnrnw owi ENG/NEEF� • '� '�"'r, NALL MAR/YENG/NEER/NCi, INC' -------- /007SOP.OLMCANYONOR. ;t edvF PALM SPR/N65, CA. . 7 J r -ARTNWaRX OI/ANT/T/ES •.X :Xl.J✓.f"QV. ... J. 700 LY, e rw GtfA __ . C fl!5AYRMN7.f............ 2.7714Y rsmr+wr a,x rusc•1'+c+rs..v�r /. r`,Y PAV/N6 OUANT .-� 1'1G i�fMEN7 ...... if.Dlf fF �• �i � ,r6 ORAO/N6 5PE6/F/G47/01V8 ILA l Rlxxw✓.xw..'x�I.+'rr♦Wnyp wnhx �s.wshdhlo�lxMR/luAw✓ '{I.. F «//Mhr.,r nrw ti✓Fy pMb.+I Nhr.✓ f Mx n I-.Y I' 1yK � •,p5x� , '� �-e f .flbrNKb.^'1 .'M V%'7. w�K i« xY/�W wh✓. f se7.w...e...w:o.�r/,avx/✓.�ie.s w✓'w o+.�.✓Ner lh..nr A.'«M fwr I Cw/�4 Mw'/.�t"4aYPv MrW/r/ram/rYa�✓+rAµl:� �-AN ix-f H✓/ w wx+orre +As4ylh✓tr.rc..wyd.Ln...n w / (/f.I1p.x5M.Mw^Y wwK lrMwlx/b Wr+r.�r.Y<-`I1x/14v �wW /�� ! ay..16/M'wl brV✓.wj�wlY.w✓M,I�r ww YM, f .p.Oh r.s...axb M✓�.�.n✓wdwwr+.w..x r nx sw•i r,..,...w. O AY.wny LYw/+r, .MYw,+4elY/�/I awd4/w !✓x.-w's �yN ..wsr..o`a .oi✓ u+m.. «,r A-rsndl/A'la1CyryN.MdnyM1 S/L ►/ER Sp169 MOB/L E,1154NOR CITY OX' PALM OESE/77• GOL/FORN/A VIC/N/7Y MAP G Gt:(Xr off 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION REPORT Date: June 22, 1978 REPORT ON: Mobile Home - Subdivision Addition CASE NO.: 128MF ZONE: R-M LOCATION: Silver Spur Mobile Manor APPLICANT: BRUCE BEDIG NATURE OF APPROVAL SOUGHT: Final Landscaping DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION: After reviewing the submitted plans and thAPPROVEDntations by the staff and by the applicant, the DRB this project, subject to the attached conditions. Date of Action Motion Made By Seconded By Vote: June 20, 1978 Urrutia Leung 5-0 Reasons for Negative Vote (s): (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen (l5) days of the date of the decision.) STAFF COMMENTS: DESIGN REVIEW BOARD CASE NO.: APPLICANT: LOCATION: ZONING: Silver Sour Mobile Manor STAFF RECOIBIENDATION: DATE: June 20, 1978 Staff would recommend approval of the final landscaping plan in light of the additional information received from the applicant (See attached letters): SILVER SPUR MOBILE MANOR HIGHWAY SEVENTY FOURS PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 • 714/346-4219 E C E I V E June 7, 1978 JUN 9 1978 PALM DESERT CITY HALL CITY CLERK'S OFFICE City Clerk Design Review Board City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, CA 92260 Gentlemen: Please find enclosed two copies of a memorandum which is submitted for your review and consideration concerning Case No. 128MF; Zone R-M; Mobilehome Subdivision Addition to Silver Spur Mobile Manor. Please calendar this written response for hearing at the next scheduled meeting of the Design Review Board. It would be appreciated if I am advised of the date of said hearing so that I may plan to be in attendance. Thank you for your courtesy and assistance in this matter. BEB:pt Enclosures Very truly yours, SILVER SPUR RESERVE - zF-0046 uce E. Bedig Managing Partner RECEIVEa,. JUN 9 197un ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CITY. CIE PALM DESERT, MEMORANDUM TO: Design Review Board City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, CA 92260 DATE: June 6, 1978 RE: Case No. 128 MF; Zone R-M; Mobilehome Subdivision Addition to Silver Spur Mobile Manor, Palm Desert, Thank you for the written notice dated May 31, 1978, that the action on the amenity improvements has been con- tinued pending the Design Review Board's review of the rationale supporting the amenity package previously sub- mitted to the City of Palm Desert. Based upon my discussion with Messrs. Paul A. Williams and Ralph J. Cipriani on June 2, 1978, the following is respectfully submitted for your review and consideration. I am advised that the Design Review Board and Planning Commission have approved the concept of dedication of the existing rock area to perpetual open space so as to pre- serve, presently and in the future, the natural beauty of this desert formation, except for a lawn area with meandering paths and an open bench and barbeque area for resident social gatherings. The question which I am advised is at issue is whether the addition of a second swimming pool (not therapy pool) at the existing social, recreation and clubhouse area is feasible in terms of resident usage and enjoyment. The reasons supporting the applicant's not building a second swimming pool may be summarized as follows: 1. The approval of the amenity plans without a second swimming pool would be consistent with the appli- cant's concept to broaden the spectrum of amenities available to obtain maximum resident usage according to the residents' social and recreational preferences. 2. There does not exist sufficient available space within the existing social, recreation, clubhouse and swimming area to build a second swimming pool. 3. The existing swimming pool provides sufficient water area for the residents based upon their use of same. 4. The expansion and "Kool Decking" of the existing swimming pool deck area with additional furniture will provide the residents with their primary need according to their historical social desires. The November, 1977, residents' opinion poll and other resident preferences expressed to me confirm that the residents desire additional area around the pool to gather, socialize, and sun themselves with separate toilet facilities. These improvements have been provided for in the plans previously submitted. 5. The present swimming pool water surface area is more than sufficient for adult usage at peak periods. P. Memorandum to Design Review Board June 6, 1978 Page Two 6. The question of children usage has not been at issue as the children are provided with definite hours for their exclusive use. As this is an adult park, any deviation from this policy by management would conflict with the residents` interpretation of the adult lifestyle concept of the park, and would be counter -productive to the expressed preferences of the majority of residents to provide only limited children's access to pool facilities. 7. The approval of the amenity plan, as submitted, without a second swimming pool is consistent with the resident opinion poll taken in November, 1977 (a copy of which has been presented to Mr. Paul Williams, AIP, Director of Environmental Services, for his information, review, and files). 8. The prior owner, at one time, maintained two swimming areas and eliminated the second pool due to residents' objections, liability, and mainte- nance disadvantages. 9. The submitted plans include a decision to add an additional therapy pool based upon the following: a. A second therapy pool will allow two constant "hot" temperature levels (higher and lower) so as to be available to a broader range of residents. b. This facility is a desirable addition due to the age of our residents and physical therapy benefits which this amenity provides. C. The second therapy pool will contain a para- plegic device to allow access to our older residents who are denied access to the existing pool due to (1) an inability to negotiate the steps, and/or (2) tolerate the higher "hot" temperature maintained by a small minority of residents who treat the single existing therapy pool as their exclusive facility. Accordingly, it is respectfully requested that the Silver Spur Reserve application be approved without the addition of a second swimming pool in the "natural desert park area" or at the existing recreational and clubhouse facility. Please calendar this response for hearing at the next scheduled meeting of the Design Review Board. cc: Paul A. Williams, AIP Ralph J. Cipriani SILVE PUR RESERVE Bruce E. Bedig Managing Partner /9 CONSULTANT 22 Stanford Drive Rancho Mirage, California 92270 714 - 328-0529 Design Council Review Board City of Palm Desert P.O. Box 1648 Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 ii ir,p - V ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES JUNY i19 QALWIMERT Re: Case #128MF Addition to Silver Spur Mobile Manor Gentlemen: I would like to comment regarding this case inasmuch as I was the general partner of the limited partnership that sold this park to Silver Spur Reserve. At the time we purchased the park some eight years ago there were two swimming pools in the park even though the number of residents was about 1/3 of the number now living there, in view of the numerous additions made to the park. The residents at that time did not use the second swimming pool and did not want it in the park and we finally filled the pool in and turned it into landscaping. Since that time and up to June 1, 1977 when we sold the park, there was never any indication from anybody in the park that they wanted to have another swimming pool. As a matter of fact, in the seven years I have never seen the present swimming pool used up to anywhere close to its reasonable capacity. For a number of years I was counsel of .lbile Home Com- munities of Denver, Colorado and did the purchasing of large parks across the United States so I believe I can qualify as somewhat knowledgable in park operation and park planning. It is a generally known fact in the mobile home park operations that it is a very serious mistake to have,in a park of this size..over one swimming pool. Two swimming pools will generally result in encouraging people to feel, regardless of how well it is done, that one is better than the other or that management does more for one group than the other. Obviously this is not a con- 9 Design Council Review Board June 13, 1978 Page 2 dition that is sound in any park and I am sure that if you care to, I can furnish you with many independent operators' opinion on this condition. Of course, I am sure that you understand this does not apply when you have a park that has a family section and an adult -- section, but it applies to every park that I have been involved with over the years. I have reviewed the plans in detail and in my opinion the amenities, the changes, the preservation of open space will lend a great deal to the park and the resi- dents' enjoyment of it. I strongly believe that two swimming pools would take away from the park rather than benefiting it. I strongly urge you to approve the request that the swimming pool be dropped from the plans. Sincerely, t3ubbard CRH/mj CC. Mayor Ed Mullins Alexis Newbrar.der Noel Brush Jim McPherson Roy Wilson George Berkey, Chairman of Planning Commission Ronald R. Knippel, Assistant Planner Paul Williams, Director of Environmental Services Bruce Bedig, Silver Spur Reserve, 160 Franklin St., Oakland, Ca. 94607 C 24 MEMORANDUM TO: Design Review Board City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, CA 92260 DATE: June 6, 1978 RE: Case No. 128 MF; Zone R-M; Mobilehome Subdivision Addition to Silver Spur Mobile Manor, Palm Desert, CA Thank you for the written notice dated May 31, 1978, that the action on the amenity improvements has been con- tinued pending the Design Review Board's review of the rationale supporting the amenity package previously sub- mitted to the City of Palm Desert. Based upon my discussion with Messrs. Paul A. Williams and Ralph J. Cipriani on June 2, 1978, the following is respectfully submitted for your review and consideration. I am advised that the Design Review Board and Planning Commission have approved the concept of dedication of the existing rock area to perpetual open space so as to pre- serve, presently and in the future, the natural beauty of this desert formation, except for a lawn area with meandering paths and an open bench and barbeque area for resident social gatherings. The question which I am advised is at issue is whether the addition of a second swimming pool (not therapy pool) at the existing social, recreation and clubhouse area is feasible in terms of resident usage and enjoyment. The reasons supporting the applicant's not building a second swimming pool may be summarized as 'follows: 1. The approval of the amenity plans without a second swimming pool would be consistent with the appli- cant's concept to broaden the spectrum of amenities available to obtain maximum resident usage according to the residents' social and recreational preferences. 2. There does not exist sufficient available space within the existing social, recreation, clubhouse and swimming area to build a second swimming pool. 3. The existing swimming pool provides sufficient water area for the residents based upon their use of same. 4. The expansion and "Kool Decking" of the existing swimming pool deck area with additional furniture will provide the residents with their primary need according to their historical social desires. The November, 1977, residents' opinion poll and other resident preferences expressed to me confirm that the residents desire additional area around the pool to gather, socialize, and sun themselves with separate toilet facilities. These improvements have been provided for in the plans previously submitted. 5. The present swimming pool water surface area is more than sufficient for adult usage at peak periods. Q. Memorandum to Design Review Board June 6, 1978 Page Two 6. The question of children usage has not been at issue as the children are provided with definite hours for their exclusive use. As this is an adult park, any deviation from this policy by management would conflict with the residents' interpretation of the adult lifestyle concept of the park, and would be counter -productive to the expressed preferences of the majority of residents to provide only limited children's access to pool facilities. The approval of the amenity plan, as submitted, without a second swimming pool is consistent with the resident opinion poll taken in November, 1977 (a copy of which has been presented to Mr. Paul Williams, AIP, Director of Environmental Services, for his information, review, and files). 8. The prior owner, at one time, maintained two swimming areas and eliminated the second pool due to residents' objections, liability, and mainte- nance disadvantages. 9. The submitted plans include a decision to add an additional therapy pool based upon the following: a. A second therapy pool will allow two constant "hot" temperature levels (higher and lower) so as to be available to a broader range of residents. b. This facility is a desirable addition due to the age of our residents and physical therapy benefits which this amenity provides. c. The second therapy pool will contain a para- plegic device to allow access to our older residents who are denied access to the existing pool due to (1) an inability to negotiate the steps, and/or (2) tolerate the higher "hot" temperature maintained by a small minority of residents who treat the single existing therapy pool as their exclusive facility. Accordingly, it is respectfully requested that the Silver Spur Reserve application be approved without the addition of a second swimming pool in the "natural desert park area" or at the existing recreational and clubhouse facility. Please calendar this response for hearing at the next scheduled meeting of the Design Review Board. cc: Paul A. Williams, AIP Ralph J. Cipriani SILVEIL,SPUR RESERVE A:_ Bedig Managing Partner r- MEMORANDUM TO: Design Review Board City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, CA 92260 DATE: June 6, 1978 RE: Case No. 128 MF; Zone R-M; Mobilehome Subdivision Addition to Silver Spur Mobile Manor, Palm Desert, CA Thank you for the written notice dated May 31, 1978, that the action on the amenity improvements has been con- tinued pending the Design Review Board's review of the rationale supporting the amenity package previously sub- mitted to the City of Palm Desert. Based upon my discussion with Messrs. Paul A. Williams and Ralph J. Cipriani on June 2, 1978, the following is respectfully submitted for your review and consideration. I am advised that the Design Review Board and Planning Commission have approved the concept of dedication of the existing rock area to perpetual open space so as to pre- serve, presently and in the future, the natural beauty of this desert formation, except for a lawn area with meandering paths and an open bench and barbeque area for resident social gatherings. The question which I am advised is at issue is whether the addition of a second swimming pool (not therapy pool) at the existing social, recreation and clubhouse area is feasible in terms of resident usage and enjoyment. The reasons supporting the applicant's not building a second swimming pool may be summarized as follows: 1. The approval of the amenity plans without a second swimming pool would be consistent with the appli- cant's concept to broaden the spectrum of amenities available to obtain maximum resident usage according to the residents' social and recreational preferences. 2. There does not exist sufficient available space within the existing social, recreation, clubhouse and swimming area to build a second swimming pool. 3. The existing swimming pool provides sufficient water area for the residents based upon their use of same. 4. The expansion and "Kool Decking" of the existing swimming pool deck area with additional furniture will provide the residents with their primary need according to their historical social desires. The November, 1977, residents' opinion poll and other resident preferences expressed to me confirm that the residents desire additional area around the pool to gather, socialize, and sun themselves with separate toilet facilities. These improvements have been provided for in the plans previously submitted. 5. The present swimming pool water surface area is more than sufficient for adult usage at peak periods. Memorandum to Design Review Board June 6, 1978 Page Two The question of children usage has not been at issue as the children are provided with definite hours for their exclusive use. As this is an adult park, any deviation from this policy by management would conflict with the residents' interpretation of the adult lifestyle concept of the park, and would be counter -productive to the expressed preferences of the majority of residents to provide only limited children's access to pool facilities. 7. The approval of the amenity plan, as submitted, without a second swimming pool is consistent with the resident opinion poll taken in November, 1977 (a copy of which has been presented to Mr. Paul Williams, AIP, Director of Environmental Services, for his information, review, and files). 8. The prior owner, at one time, maintained two swimming areas and eliminated the second pool due to residents' objections, liability, and mainte- nance disadvantages. 9. The submitted plans include a decision to add an additional therapy pool based upon the following: a. A second therapy pool will allow two constant "hot" temperature levels (higher and lower) so as to be available to a broader range of residents. b. This facility is a desirable addition due to the age of our residents and physical therapy benefits which this amenity provides. c. The second therapy pool will contain a para- plegic device to allow access to our older residents who are denied access to the existing pool due to (1) an inability to negotiate the steps, and/or (2) tolerate the higher "hot" temperature maintained by a small minority of residents who treat the single existing therapy pool as their exclusive facility. Accordingly, it is respectfully requested that the Silver Spur Reserve application be approved without the addition of a second swimming pool in the "natural desert park area" or at the existing recreational and clubhouse facility. Please calendar this response for hearing at the next scheduled meeting of the Design Review Board. SILVE PUR�RVE Bruce E. Bedig Ov Managing Partner cc: Paul A. Williams, AIP Ralph J. Cipriani SILVER SPQR MOBILE MANOR HIGHWAY SEVENTY -FOURS PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260• 714 346.4219 RE C E I V E June 7, 1978 J U N 9 1978 PALM DESERT CITY HALL CITY CLERK'S OFFICE City Clerk Design Review Board City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, CA 92260 Gentlemen: Please find enclosed two copies of a memorandum which is submitted for your review and consideration concerning Case No. 128MF; Zone R-M; Mobilehome Subdivision Addition to Silver Spur Mobile Manor. Please calendar this written response for hearing at the next scheduled meeting of the Design Review Board. It would be appreciated if I am advised of the date of said hearing so that I may plan to be in attendance. Thank you for your courtesy and assistance in this matter. BEB:pt Enclosures Very truly yours, SILVER SPUR RESERVE AL ce E. Bedig Managing Partner RwECEIVhi, JUN 9 IS —/on ENVIRONMENIAL SERVICES CITY OF. PALM DESERT CONSULTANT 22 Stanford Drive Rancho Mirage, California 92270 714 - 328-0529 Design Council Review Board City of Palm Desert P.O. Box 1648 Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 AIN 1 , . ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES JuRty PS eALW%EW Re: Case #128MF Addition to Silver Spur Mobile Manor Gentlemen: I would like to comment regarding this case inasmuch as I was the general partner of the limited partnership that sold this park to Silver Spur Reserve. At the time we purchased the park some eight years ago there were two swimming pools in the park even though the number of residents was about 1/3 of the number now living there, in view of the numerous additions made to the park. The residents at that time did not use the second swimming pool and did not want it in the park and we finally filled the pool in and turned it into landscaping. Since that time and up to June 1, 1977 when we sold the park, there was never any indication from anybody in the park that they wanted to have another swimming pool. As a matter of fact, in the seven years I have never seen the present swimming pool used up to anywhere close to its reasonable capacity. For a number of years I was counsel of Mobile Home Com- munities of Denver, Colorado and did the purchasing of large parks across the United States so I believe I can qualify as somewhat knowledgable in park operation and park planning. It is a generally known fact in the mobile home park operations that it is a very serious mistake to have,in a park of this size -over one swimming pool. Two swimming pools will generally result in encouraging people to feel, regardless of how well it is done, that one is better than the other or that management does more for one group than the other. Obviously this is not a con- Design Council Review Board June 13, 1978 Page 2 dition that is sound in any park and I am sure that if you care to, I can furnish you with many independent operators' opinion on this condition. Of course, I am sure that you understand this does not apply when you have a park that has a family section and an adult section, but it applies to every park that I have been involved with over the years. I have reviewed the plans in detail and in my opinion the amenities, the changes, the preservation of open space will lend a great deal to the park and the resi- dents' enjoyment of it. I strongly believe that two swimming pools would take away from the park rather than benefiting it. I strongly urge you to approve the request that the swimming pool be dropped from the plans. Sincerely, o e Hubkiard CRH/mj cc: Mayor Ed Mullins Alexis Newbrander Noel Brush Jim McPherson Roy Wilson George Berkey, Chairman of Planning Commission Ronald R. Knippel, Assistant Planner Paul Williams, Director of Environmental Services Bruce Bedig, Silver Spur Reserve, 160 Franklin St Oakland, Ca. 94607 CONSULTANT 22 Stanford Drive Rancho Mirage, California 92270 714 - 328-0529 June 13, 1978 Design Council Review Board City of Palm Desert P.O. Box 1648 Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 Re: Case #128MF Addition to Silver Spur Mobile Manor Gentlemen: I would like to comment regarding this case inasmuch as I was the general partner of the limited partnership that sold this park to Silver Spur Reserve. At the time we purchased the park some eight years ago there were two swimming pools in the park even though the number of residents was about 1/3 of the number now living there) in view of the numerous additions made to the park. The residents at that time did not use the second swimming pool and did not want it in the park and we finally filled the pool in and turned it into landscaping. Since that time and up to June 1, 1977 when we sold the park, there was never any indication from anybody in the park that they wanted to have another swimming pool. As a matter of fact, in the seven years I have never seen the present swimming pool used up to anywhere close to its reasonable capacity. For a number of years I was counsel of Mobile Home Com- munities of Denver, Colorado and did the purchasing of large parks across the United States so I believe I can qualify as somewhat knowledgable in park operation and park planning. It is a generally known fact in the mobile home park operations that it is a very serious mistake to have,in a park of this size..over one swimming pool. Two swimming pools will generally result in encouraging people to feel, regardless of how well it is done, that one is better than the other or that management does more for one group than the other. Obviously this is not a con- Design Council Review Board June 13, 1978 Page 2 dition that is sound in any park and I am sure that if you care to, I can furnish you with many independent operators' opinion on this condition. Of course, I am sure that you understand this does not apply when you have a park that has a family section and an adult section, but it applies to every park that I have been involved with over the years. I have reviewed the plans in detail and in my opinion the amenities, the changes, the preservation of open space will lend a great deal to the park and the resi- dents' enjoyment of it. I strongly believe that two swimming pools would take away from the park rather than benefiting it. I strongly urge you to approve the request that the swimming pool be dropped from the plans. Sincerely, `--e-.R_0beubbard CRH/mj cc: Mayor Ed Mullins Alexis Newbrander Noel Brush Jim McPherson Roy Wilson George Berkey, Chairman of Planning Commission Ronald R. Knippel, Assistant Planner Paul Williams, Director of Environmental Services Bruce Bedig, Silver Spur Reserve, 160 Franklin St., Oakland, Ca. 94607 T PLANNII`SG COIXMISSIOI! RESOLUTION NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO. CUP 13-77 AUGUST 30, 1977 I. The development of the property shall conform substantially with that as shown on Plot Plan marked Exhibit A on file with the Department of Environ- mental Services, Case No. CUP 13-77, unless otherwise amended by the follow- ing conditions. 2. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for construction of any use con- templated by this approval, the applicant shall first obtain permits and clearance from the following public agencies: Department of Public Health Palm Desert City Fire Marshal Department of Public Works Coachella Valley County Water District Palm Desert Design Review Board Regional Water Quality Control Board #7 Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to the Building and Safety Department at the time of the issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. 3. A preliminary landscaping, grading, lighting, amenities, trash storage, walkway layout, signage, and irrigation plan shall be submitted through the Design Review Board process for approval prior to issuance of building permits. 4. The sewage disposal system shall be submitted to and approved by the Coachella Valley County Water District prior to issuance of a building permit. 5. This approval_ shall be used within one year, otherwise it shall become null and void. 6. All utility distribution service lines within or adjacent to the subject property shall be placed underground. 7. A six (6) foot decorative masonry wall or alternate as approved by the Design Review Board process shall be installed along the complete frontage of the north and west property lines. All other fencing shall be approved by the Design Review Board process. 8. The applicant shall comply with any laws, regulations, and requirements of the City of Palm Desert, the State of California or any other applicable government agency as a part of construction. 9. Construction of all private streets shall be inspected by the Engineering Depart- ment and a standard fee shall be paid. 10. Install Riverside County Standard Fire Hydrants, located at intersections so no mobile home is more than 250 feet from a hydrant. 11. Fire hydrants shall be installed on approved looped water mains as follows: a. A minimum of 6 inch diameter to serve all buildings and recreational vehicle storage lots. 12. Provide the following fire flows for a two (2) hour duration in addition to domestic or irrigation supply. All computations shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement. a. 500 GPM to serve all buildings and mobile homes. b. 500 GPM to serve recreational vehicle storage lot. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO. CUP 13-77 August 30, 1977 Page Two 13. Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish the original and three (3) copies of the water system plan to the Fire Marshal for review. 14. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and approved by the water company with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system in CUP 13-77 is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Fire Marshal". Upon approval, the original plan will be return- ed to the developer. 15. The subject site shall be annexed to Improvement District Nos. 54 & 80 of the C.V.C.W.D for sanitation service and to the Coachella Valley Stormwater Unit of the C.V.C.W.D. 16. The applicant shall engineer; and provide for drainage facilities necessary to handle runoff waters along the northerly boundary of this subdivision to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 17. In conformance with the Zoning Ordinance requirement, minimum of 6800 square feet of community use area, the be approved by staff. AGRFFMFNT applicant shall provide a location of which is to I accept and agree, prior to use of this permit or approval, to comply with all the conditions set forth, and understand the Department of Building and Safety will not issue a building permit or allow occupancy on the use permitted until this signed confirmation has been received by the Department of Environmental Services. Silver Pur Restive Se tember 7 1977 B : Gam/ Date Applicant's ignatu lm Bruce E. Bedig, Managing Partner Minutes Palm Desert Design Re:,ee, °card May 15, 1978 ?ace Two 5. Case lo. 231`1 - CARL CO}; - Final construction drawings for a recreation center e Silver Spur Mobile '•anor. Applicant adF�� ^ot present. On a -- tion y Jackson, seconded by Urrutia, the Boar,: approved the final cor- structi rawings for the recreation center addition. Carried 5-0 (Jackson, Urrutia, Leung, Minturn, Johnson). 6. Case No. 74C - GLANZ AND JOHNSON - Final landscaping plans for a commercial structure to be located at the southwest corner of Highway 111 and El Paseo, east of Portola. Applicant present. On a motion by Jackson, seconded by Leung, the Board approved the final land- scaping plans subject to the applicant increasing the size of the street trees to a minimum 13" box and relocating vertical landscaping elements out of the 25 ft. line of site radius of the intersection of Highway 111 and E1 Paseo. Carried 5-0 (Jackson, Leung, Minturn, Urrutia, Johnson). 7. Case No. 28C - HENRY TAGLE - Preliminary site, floor and elevations for a restaurant to be located at the northwest corner of DeAnza Way and Palm Desert Drive. Applicant present. On a motion by Urrutia, seconded by Jackson, the Board approved the preliminary site, floor and elevations, subject to the following: a. Landscaping plan be revised as follows: I. A minimum 24" box size trees be used in parking lot. Tree type should be Carob. 2. Eliminate landscaping in front of trash enclosure. 3. Add street trees along project perimeter. Tree type should be Rhus lancea. b. Revise plan to maintain 25' line of site radius clear at intersection of DeAnza Way and Palm Desert Drive. Carried 5-0 (Jackson, Leung, Minturn, Urrutia, Johnson). 8. Case No. 99MF - SUNRISE COMPANY - Final construction drawings for sales office, gatehouse, and administration building for a 780-unit condominium project to be located north of the Whitewater Storm Channel between Portola and Monterey. Applicant present. On a motion by Minturn, seconded by Leung, the Board approved the final con- struction drawings for the sales office, gatehouse, and administration building. Carried 5-0 (Minturn, Leung, Jackson, Urrutia, Johnson). 9. Case No. 127MF - DOUGLAS STONE - Preliminary site, floor and elevations for a To -unit apartment building to be located at the southeast corner of Las Palmas and San Gorgonio. Applicant present. On a motion by Jackson, seconded by Leung, the Board approved the preliminary site, floor and elevations with the following modifications: a. Provide trees -along wall at south and east property lines. b. Provide trees around buildings and in open space areas. c. Provide access from apartments, where appropriate, for use of open space. d. Use Mexican Ash trees in parking lot area and bottle trees in open space areas. Carried 5-0 (Jackson, Leung, Minturn, Urrutia, Johnson). (TFt:a�ur o:ff 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (TI4) 346-0611 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION REPORT Date: May 31, 1978 REPORT ON: Mobile Home Subdivision Addition CASE NO.: 128MF ZONE: R-M LOCATION: Silver Spur Mobile Manor APPLICANT: MICHAEL BUCCINO NATURE OF APPROVAL SOUGHT: Final Landscaping DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION: After reviewing the submitted plans and the presentations by the staff and by the applicant, the DRB CONTINUED this project, subject to the attached conditions. Date of Action: Motion Made By: Seconded By: Vote: May 23, 1978 Jackson Urrutia 4-0 Reasons for Negative Vote (s): (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision.) STAFF COMMENTS: DESIGN RE:'IE',i : OAr.D DATE. Mav 2 ;. 1978 CASE NO.: 128MF APPLICANT: MICHAEL BUCCINO LOCATION: Silver Snur Mobile Manor ZONING: u_u STAFF RECO111IENDATION f Condition No. 7 requires a perimeter decorative masonry wall or alternate as approved by the Design Review Board. The applicant is proposing chain link with landscaping in front of it. Staff is also recommending the addition of a childrens' swimming pool (see attached letter, item No. 3). If these two items are resolved, Staff would recom- mend approval of the plans. o:ff =F-s3Z-='_ra 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 April 18, 1978 Mr. Robert E. Saunders, President Hallmark Engineering, Inc. 1007 S. Palm Canyon Dr., Suite F Palm Springs, CA 92262 Re: Silver Spur Addition Dear Mr. Saunders: The following modifications should be made to the plans for the approved addition to Silver Spur Mobile Manor submitted to this office and the additional information provided at your earliest convenience: 1. Lot 6 on Flying F Drive shall be deleted and shall be utilized as common open space. 2. A masonry wall shall be provided along the perimeter of the addition as required by the Conditions of Approval. 3. The picnic area shown is acceptable, but a childrens' swimming pool should also be included in order to alleviate some of the overcrowd- ing at the existing pool. 4. A number of the lots will have to be increased in size in order to conform with the 5,000 sq. ft. minimum lot size. 5. A detailed landscaping plan should be submitted to the Department of Environmental Services for review and this plan shall include the palm trees shown in the original submittal. It should be noted that the expansion and remodeling of the existing common facilities is a separate matter and these plans can be processed through the City as soon as this Department receives elevations for the proposed Lobby building. If you have any questions, please contact this office. Very ycurs, Paul A. Williams, A.I.P. Director of Environmental Services rjc/pw/ks cc: Bruce BediO 1 -/7 1. The develocment of the pr^:;crty shall confor•- shown on Plot Plan marked Exhibit A on file ., mental Services, Case 111o. CUP 13-77, unless J ing conditions. 1 r. 2. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for ccnstruc_ion of any use cgr.- temolated by this approval, the applicant shall first obtain permits and clearance from the following public agencies: Department of Public Health Department of Public Works Palm Desert Design Review Board Palm Desert City Fire Marshal Coachella Valley County Slater District Regional Water Quality Control Board =7 Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be pre -rated to the Building and Safety Departr^.ent at the time of the issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated here:rith. 3. A preliminary landscaping, grading, lighting, amenities, trash storace, walk.eay layout, signage, and irrigation plan shall be submitted throuch the Lesion Review Board process for approval prior to issuance of building permits. 4. The sewage disposal system shall be submitted to and approved by the Coachella Valley County Water District prior to issuance of a building permit. 5. This approval_ shall be used within one year, otherwise it shall become null and void. 6. All utility distribution service lines within or adjacent to the subject property shall be placed underground. 7. A six (6) foot decorative masonry wall or alternate as approved by the Cesign Review Board process shall be installed along the complete frontage of the north and west property lines. Ail other fencing shall be approved by the Design Review Board process. 8. The applicant shall comply with any laws, regulations, and requirements of the City Of Palm Desert, the State of California or any other applicable government agency as a part of construction. 9. Construction of all private streets shall be inspected by the Engineering Depart- ment and a standard fee shall be paid. 10. Install Riverside County Standard Fire Hydrants, located at intersections so no mobile home is more than 250 feet from a hydrant. 11. Fire hydrants shall be installed on approved looped water mains as follows: a. A minimum of 6 inch diameter to serve all buildings and recreational vehicle storage lots. 12. Provide the following fire flows for a two (2) hour duration in addition to domestic or irrigation supply. All computations shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement. a. 500 GP,` to serve all buildings and mobile homes. 500 G?'! to serve recrea�ional vehicle storage lot. i r Cn�G ]' 13. Prior to i%',uance of bui1,4ing par^its h and three (;) copies Of the water systempl,;n _^,e Fireal^for?rev;-w. 14. The .dater system plan shall be sinned by a regi; :ivil enSin�er and y the wdrr_r co;^pany with the foilc.di design of nn certi`i _.;. - n: "1 certify that the water system in CUP 13-77 is in ac_ -_:c a .,i;h the re;uir,m:: a prescribed by the Fire Marshal". Upon approval, tc? original plan :,ill be re-jrn- ed to the developer. 15. The subject site shall be annexed to C.V.C.:•!.D for sanitation service and the C.V.C-W.D. Improvement District 'Nos. 54 & 20 of th? to the Coachella Valley StolTa:ter Unit of 16. The applicant shall engineer; and provide for draina e to handle runoff graters alon S- facilities necessary 9 the ncrtherly boundary of this subdivision to the satisfaction of the City EnOineer. 17. In conformance with the Zoning Ordinance requirement, applicant shall Provide a minimum of 6800 square feet of community use area, the location of which is to be approved by staff. e of this permit or approval, to comply with all nderstand the Department of Building and Safety will allow occupancy on the use permitted until this signed by the Department of Environmental Services. Silver. pur [lesP�se Applicant's �ignat Bruce E. Bt2diA, Manavin- Partner A i 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION REPORT Date: May 18, 1978 REPORT ON: Recreation Center Addition CASE NO.: 128MF ZONE: R-M LOCATION: Silver Spur Mobile Manor APPLICANT: CARL COX NATURE OF APPROVAL SOUGHT: Final construction drawings DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION: After reviewing the submitted plans and the presentations by the staff and by the applicant, the DRB APPRoy'n this project, subject to the attached conditions. Date of Action Motion Made By Seconded By: Vote: May 16 1978 JACKSON URRUTIA 5-0 Reasons for Ne ative Voe (s): (An appea of the above actiotn may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision.) STAFF COMMENTS: DESIGN REVIEW SCARD CASE NO.: 128 MF APPLICANT: Carl Cox LOCATION: Silver Spur Mobile Manor ZONING: R-M STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve the final construction drawings DATE May 9, 1978 t PLANNING COF'MISSION RESOLUTION NO. AUGUST 30, 1977 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO. CUP 13-77 1. The development of the property shall conform substantially with that as shown on Plot Plan marked Exhibit A on file with the Department of Environ- mental Services, Case No. CUP 13-77, unless otherwise amended by the follow- ing conditions. 2. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for construction of any use con- templated by this approval, the applicant shall first obtain permits and clearance from the following public agencies: Department of Public Health Palm Desert City Fire Marshal Department of Public Works Coachella Valley County Water District Palm Desert Design Review Board Regional Water Quality Control Board #7 Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to the Building and Safety Department at the time of the issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. 3. A preliminary landscaping, grading, lighting, amenities, trash storage, walkway layout, signage, and irrigation plan shall be submitted through the Design Review Board process for approval prior to issuance of building permits. 4. The sewage disposal system shall be submitted to and approved by the Coachella Valley County Water District prior to issuance of a building permit. 5. This approval. shall be used within one year, otherwise it shall become null and void. 6. All utility distribution service lines within or adjacent to the subject property shall be placed underground. 7. A six (6) foot decorative masonry wall or alternate as approved by the Design Review Board process shall be installed along the complete frontage of the north and west property lines. All other fencing shall be approved by the Design Review Board process. 8. The applicant shall comply with any laws, regulations, and requirements of the City of Palm Desert, the State of California or any other applicable government agency as a part of construction. 9. Construction of all private streets shall be inspected by the Engineering Depart- ment and a standard fee shall be paid. 10. Install Riverside County Standard Fire Hydrants, located at intersections so no mobile home is more than 250 feet from a hydrant. 11. Fire hydrants shall be installed on approved looped water mains as follows: a. A minimum of 6 inch diameter to serve all buildings and recreational vehicle storage lots. 12. Provide the following fire flows for a two (2) hour duration in addition to domestic or irrigation supply. All computations shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement. a. 500 GPM to serve all buildings and mobile homes. b. 500 GPM to serve recreational vehicle storage lot. o- r CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO. CUP 13-77 August 30, 1977 Page Two 13. Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish the original and three (3) copies of the water system plan to the Fire Marshal for review. 14. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and approved by the water company with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system in CUP 13-77 is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Fire Marshal". Upon approval, the original plan will be return- ed to the developer. 15. The subject site shall be annexed to Improvement District Nos. 54 & 80 of the C.V.C.W.D for sanitation service and to the Coachella Valley Stormwater Unit of the C.V.C.W.D. 16. The applicant shall engineer; and provide for drainage facilities necessary to handle runoff waters along the northerly boundary of this subdivision to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 17. In conformance with the Zoning Ordinance requirement, applicant shall provide a minimum of 6800 square feet of community use area, the location of which is to be approved by staff. AGREEMENT I accept and agree, prior to use of this permit or approval, to comply with all the conditions set forth, and understand the Department of Building and Safety will not issue a building permit or allow occupancy on the use permitted until this signed confirmation has been received by the Department of Environmental Services. Silver pur Resexve Se tember 7 1977 By Gam/ Date Applicant's ignatu Bruce E. Bedig, Managing Partner 2?Q)M299 ***DESIGN REVIEW BOARD*** DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION ( please pint ) Mailing ( `v City REQUEST: (Describe specific nature of approval requested) PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: up -LOGE 01 qp� pi �J ✓ 11 i • • T 1"5 `2. ASSESSOR IS PARCEL NO. L2� I - EXISTING ZONING - Property Owner Authorization THE UNDERSIGNED STATES THAT THEY ARE THE OWNER (S) OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN AND HEREBY GIVE AUTHOR- IZATION FOR THE FILING OF THIS APPLICATION./> SIGNATUflE ATE AGREEMENT ABSOLVING THE CITY OF PALM DESERT OF ALL LIABILITIES RELATIVE TO ANY DEED RESTRICTIONS. 1 DO BY MY SIGNATURE ON THIS AGREEMENT, ABSOLVE THE CITY OF PALM DESERT OF ALL LIABILITI REGARDING ANY DEED RES- TRICTIONS THAT MAY E APPLICABLE TO THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN. SIGNATURE D Applicants Signature (FOR STAFF USE ONLY) ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS ❑ MINISTERIAL ACT E.A. No. ❑ CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION ❑ OTHER DAT AI�EPTEO CASE No. 12Y M F CITY OF PALM DESERT APPLICATION FORM DESIGN REVIEW BOARD PROCESS Design Review of: CASE NO. Acp'� 02 �fi -r TYPE OF RR ECT) 2M - � Il- S C4�:) Agreement of compliance to be signed by those applying for review. I hereby acknowledge that I have read and agree, to comply with all the following requirements, and understand that the Department of Building and Safety will not issue a building permit or allow occupancy on the use permitted until this signed confirmation has been received by the Department of Environmental Services. The development of this project shall conform substantially to all development plans submitted in behalf of this case, and as revised according to the Design Review Board process. Any minor change requires approval by the Director of Envi- ronmental Services. Any substantial change requires ap- proval by the Design Review Board. All requirements of any law, ordinance, or regulation of the State, City, and any other applicable government entity shall be complied with as part of the development process. This approval is applicable, subject to the development of this project, commencing within one year from approval date and being promptly completed. Landscaping (with irrigation system) shall be installed prior to final inspection and receiving certificate of occupancy. Curb, gutter, curb cuts, and tie-in paving shall be provided along the full frontage of the lot by means of installation prior to final inspection or other provisions as approved by the City Engineer. Construction shall conform to City Stan- dards and all requirements of the City Engineer. (?M J 0 Z 2 g (Signature) f I (D to SILva SPUR MOBILE MAmOR H a;HWAY SLbENT"1OUR• PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 922600 714/346-4219 April 27, 1978 To: City of Palm Desert, Architectural Review Board The undersigned is the Managing Partner of Silver Spur Reserve, a California general partnership, doing business as Silver Spur Mobile Manor, 50-001 Highway 74, Palm Desert, California, and hereby represents and warrants that he has the power to sign any and all documents on behalf of said partnership, and further is empowered to delegate this signatory power on behalf of the partnership to any person or persons so designated by him. For purposes of necessity and administrative convenience, this letter will hereby authorize Mr. Robert B. Turnbull, Manager of the Silver Spur Mobile Manor, to sign any and all applications, permits, or related forms required by the Architectural Review Board on behalf of Silver Spur Reserve relating solely to submission of required documents, plans, or related materials for the purpose of obtaining required municipal approval for the additional construction of mobilehome pads and/or amenity improvements on the subject real property. THIS AUTHORIZATION WILL COMMENCE AS OF THE DATE OF THIS LETTER, AND WILL TERMINATE ON WEDNESDAY, MAY 31, 1978. Mr. Turnbull is authorized to sign on the restricted basis above only as follows: Silver Spur Reserve, by Bruce E. Bedig, Managing Partner, by Robert B. Turnbull, attorney in fact, by this letter dated April 27, 1978. THIS IS A DATED AUTHORIZATION. Very truly yours, XSILVE SPUR RESERVE uce E. Bedig Managing Partner BEB:pt RECEIVED cc: Mr. Carl Cox, AIA MAY 197' ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CITY OF PALM DESERT