Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout131MF PALM DESERT 210 LTD45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 May 16, 1979 Mr. J. L. Boyd Desert Enterprises Investment Company 42500 Portola Avenue Palm Desert, CA 92260 Subject: Progress at Portola Country Club Dear Mr. Boyd: As I have indicated in our conversation of May 15th, the City is not happy with the progress regarding completion of the final phase of Portola Country Club. Your previous correspondence of March 12th indicated full compliance of all areas of concern by the end of April, and as you know, that has not occurred. Further, in our meeting of May 15th, we did point out to you further concerns with regards to the lack of clean-up along Portola, northerly of your major entrance, and the matter of the recreational vehicle storage lot not being paved. Since progress has not been satisfactory in terms of landscaping and general clean-up in the final phase of Portola Country Club, I have instructed Staff not to act upon any additional requests for trailer installations in the new area until full compliance to required condi- tions of the original approvals on this project are complete. I have further instructed Staff that unless these conditions are met by June 15th, that even previous approvals for mobile home installations will be held up until compliance is achieved. In order to forestall this, I would suggest that a greater effort be put out to complete the necessary landscaping, clean-up, etc. in the area under discussion. truly yours, Paul A. Williams, AICP Director of Environmental Services cc: James Hill Lloyd Morgan Case No. 131 MF File TO: SUBJECT: DATE: FROM: DESERT E TERPRISES INVESTMENT CO. 42500 Portola Ave. • Palm Desert • CA 92660 • (714) 346.5532 MR. PAUL WILLIAMS AND MR. JIM HILL PROGRESS AT PORTOLA COUNTRY CLUB MAY 15, 1979 J.L. JIM BOYD; ACTING PROJECT DIRECTOR The following represents the status of certain work in and around Portola Country Club. 1. The 2,650 foot North fence a. Completed grading of 30' right of way b. Installed snow fencing within right of way (some repair required) C. Installed new 1k" water line to feed emitter system. d. 95% complete - planting of tamarisk etc. within the right of way. e. Required Pyracanthas in stock and will be planted within the next few days. f. Fence slats contracted to be removed. 2. East fence has been re -constructed by Allen Fence and the slats are being removed. 3. Rebecca Road - All plants in stock and scheduled for planting this week per plan. 4. All paving on site including 25x80 parking area in North East common area complete 5. Two common areas planted and landscaped per plan. Remaining plastering of 1 pool scheduled for completion this week. 6. South West section of Golf Course complete, including re -construction of lake, planting of required trees per plan. 7. Work in progress includes re -shaping of three (3) remaining Golf Course areas, planting of trees per plan, re -shaping of lakes, repair and re -location of sprinklers, reseeding of fairways and greens etc., planting of trees on West exterior fence, placing of street name signs, removal of weeds on existing lots on Phase I, and a host of minor incidental items. It is our present feeling that we are making outstanding progress in the completion of this project, from which we plan to have the above captioned work completed by the end of May. REPORT OF DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION CASE NO.: 131 MF REPORT ON: LOCATION: West side of Rebecca Rd., between Gary Ave. ZONE: R-M APPLICANT: Palm Desert 210 Ltd. NATURE OF APPROVAL SOUGHT: Final approval of plan for landscaping along Rebecca Rd. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION: Upon reviewing the submitted plans and the presentations by the staff and by the applicant, the Design Review Board APPROVED this project, subject to revisions. Date of Action: April 24, 1979 Vote: (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision.) STAFF COMMENTS: Subject to revisions to final plans; see enclosed Minutes. MINUTES PALM DESERT DESIGN REVIEW BOARD TUESDAY - APRIL 24, 1979 2:30 P.M. - CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS I. The meeting was called to order at 2:15 p.m., after a 2-hour Study Session. Members present: Eric Johnson Phyllis Jackson Vern Barton Murrel Crump (for Paul Williams) Members absent: Jim Hill Bernie Leung Frank Urrutia Paul Williams Staff present: Stan Sawa Clyde Beebe (Study Session) It was moved by Jackson, seconded by Johnson, that the minutes of April 10, 1979, be approved as written; carried 4-0 (Jackson, Johnson, Barton, Crump). II. Minute motion approving cases found acceptable at the Study Session -- NONE. III. CASES / Case No. 131 MF - PALM DESERT 210 LTD - Final approval of plans for landscaping along Rebecca Road between Gary Avenue and Merle Avenue. Applicant was present. The applicant discussed the changing of the type of tree and vine used along the fence. On a motion by Crump, seconded by Barton, the Board approved the plan, subject to the following modifications: 1. Change Pyracantha Lelahbii to Pyracantha Graberi 2. Change Callistemon Lanceolatus (standards) to callistemon viminalis (standards) carried 4-0 (Jackson, Johnson, Barton, Crump). Case No. 97 C - GEORGE RITTER, AIA, FOR K.B. JACQUES ENT., INC. - Final construction plans for a 2-story office building on property located at 74-303 Highway 111. Applicant was present. The Board discussed the applicant's choice of tile, which is to be used above and below show windows. After considerable discussion, the Board requested that a tile which is more compatible to the colors used in the building be chosen. With regard to landscaping in the parking lot area, the Board requested that every other Carob tree along the east property line be removed with the remaining trees enlarged in size. They also requested that every other Ficus Nitida be removed in the T-shaped parking lot planter, with the remaining trees increased in size. The Board then discussed the disposition of street trees along Highway 111. After considerable discussion regarding where to place the street trees, the Board decided that 4 ft. by 4 ft. tree wells be placed adjacent to the curb with the tree well bricked in. Street tree to be used will be a Ficus Nitida. The applicant was requested to provide a concrete pad and apron for the trash enclosure to insure easy access. On a motion by Jackson, seconded by Barton, the Board approved the final construction drawings and landscaping plan, subject to the following modifications: ,,..,NDA ITEM NO. III, A-1 DATE April 24, 1979 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD CASE NO. 131 MF APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) Palm Desert 210 Ltd., P. 0. Box 1905 Newport Beach, CA 92660 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT Final approval of plan for landscaping along Rebecca Road. LOCATION West side of Rebecca Road, between Gary Avenue ZONE R-M This final landscaping plan for Rebecca Road has been submitted for the requirements of approved TT 13586 and CUP 10-77.- STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve the landscaping plan. Minutes Palm Desert Design Review Board October 24, 1978 Page Three 5. Case N 131MF - PALM DESERT 210 LTD. - Final approval of a landscape plan, perim er fenci grading, and ancillary recreation facilities for a 220 space ome subdivision located easterly of Portola and northerly of the Whitewater Channel. Applicant was present. Major concerns discussed with respect to this case were the fencing and landscaping materials to be used. On a motion by Barton, seconded by Jackson, the Board approved the final plans with the following revisions: a. Provide landscaping along the pedestrian connections to the golf course. b. Provide greater variation of landscape materials and additional materials along the golf course to buffer and protect adjacent mobile homes. Such landscape materials should include african sumac or olive trees or rhus lancea -- spreading trees with a broad head that crown out fairly low. c. 6' chain link fence shall be provided at the projects north property line with the addition of: Tamarisk every 10' and oleanders every 5' shall provide landscape buffer. 2. Pyrocantha shall be provided on the outside of the fence at 10' oc if slats are not used or on the inside of the fence if slats are used. 3. The matter of barbs on the top of the fencing shall be resolved be- tween the applicant and the Director of Environmental Services. ` d. Provide a street tree per lot in conformance with Municipal Code require- ments (Subdivision Ordinance). e. Tennis courts shall be unlighted and fenced with a 10' chain link fence. f. Additional landscaping shall be provided along the north side of the tennis courts. Oleanders would be a suitable landscape material for this location. g. Provide a minimum of five off-street parking spaces approximately 25 feet southeast of lot 220 to Ordinance Standards. h. Irrigation plan with dimensions shall be provided. i. Tree sizes shall be minimum 15 gal. on evergreen trees and 24" box on olives. j. A revised landscaping and site plan reflecting the noted revisions shall be submitted to the Environmental Services Department for approval and compliance with recommendations. Carried 4-0 (Barton, Jackson, Urrutia, Johnson). I31 Vyrr- . DESERT ENTERPRISES INVESTMENT CO. 42-500 Portola Ave. Palm Desert, CA. 92260 714-346-5531 April 12, 1979 City of Palm Desert 45275 Prickley Pear Lane Palm Desert, Calif. 92260 Dear Mr. Williams: RITCEIV Y APR 16 197 Ciry EOF ONp7EN7At SERVICES CITY PALM ©FSER With direct reference to our meeting held on Wednesday, April 10, 1979, at 3:00 pm, in reference to the wrapup of Portola Country Club. I submit for you the following in terms of the schedule of the completion of landscaping, etc. Today, Thursday, I caused an inventory of trees in ground and storage to be made. Within and around golf course property we found the following: a. 101 - 50' + or - Date Palms b. 320 - Eucalyptus (15 gal. size) C. 27 - Pine Trees In storage and on site we have: a. 50 - 15 gal. Pine Trees b. 61 - 15 gal. Eucalyptus Trees C. 7 - 25 gal. + or - Olive Trees The approved plan called for 80 Evergreen or Eucalyptus, 57 Palm Trees and 102 Pine Trees. It is our plan to immediately order and plant an additional 25 - 15 gal. Pines, as well as 50 - Pines in storage. This I submit will be completed on or before April 20, 1979. Additionally we have several hundred 1 gal, oleanders that were purchased and planted between July 17, 1978 and the present. I am negotiating this day with two engineering contractors in so -far -as the recommended 30' strip outside existing fence. I hope to commence this work not later than April 17th. /31W M I have this day arranged for purchase and delivery of 280 1 gal. Tamarisk trees and 280 1 gal. Pyracanthas'. I have lined up a quantity of 5 gal. oleanders locally as well as a quantity of 1 gal. Pyracanthas' for the Rebecca Road section as made reference to. This day I have also arranged for an exceptable and approved landscaping architect (Scott McKee) to cause immediately to be prepared the subject landscape plan on Rebecca Road as per your request and the C.U.P. directive. I now direct your attention tothe blow sand problem along the 2656' North fence. At this moment, we do not have a specific plan in so -far -as blow sand intrusion into the planted area is concerned. I suggest however that we will develop or conceive something that will allow this area to grow. A contract has been let to "Landscaping by Suzi" for the sprink- ling system and planting of the areas around the two pools. This I suggest will be complete per plan the week of April 23rd. All of the above afore mentioned planting is also contracted to "Landscaping by Suzi". I now direct your attention to the East fence. As you know, the winds earlier this week, caused several hundred feet of fence to blow over. I submit the reason it blew over was because of diagonal metal slats being placed in the original construction of the fence. I now suggest to mitigate this problem, the fence has been ordered to be restored by Allen Fence Construction and I will cause to be removed all metal slats. It is my feeling that the impact of leaving the slats in or the removal of every one or two of these slats will not eliminate the possibility of the fence blowing over in the future. I believe we both have to acknowledge that the original fence was not designed as an acceptable wind buffer. Additionally I feel that the removal of these slats will precipitate certain blow sand intrusion into and on improved lots before the plants are of sufficient size to partially eliminate such. In sumation, I am sure you will have to acknowledge from the meeting, my instructions from Jack Bennett are to expedite the above captioned work as expediciously and timely as possible. I have been further ordered and instructed to do any and all remaining incidental work in so far as getting full city acceptance of this project. We have other incidental work not necessarily discussed in this correspondence of which we are presently pursuing. Therefore, I submit that the above captioned work will be completed and I especially appreciate you and your office in the spirit of cooperation necessary for this and all endeavors. Any additional comments with respect to this project will be appreciated. Respectfully submitted, .J/ J.L. JIM BOYD Acting Project Director JB/lc P.S. With reference to the cash bond placed with the city of Palm Desert for the subject completion, Mr. Bennett has instructed me to request that it remain on deposit for an additional 30 day period or until May 16, 1979. )21 MC 0 i r ®, Jchae��er bur_4ercu, inc. 259 HIGHWAY 395 FALLBROOK, CALIFORNIA 92028 714 Area 728-7090 July 17.197R Desert __.arnri^es Inve7tment Co. g2500 Portol-a oir Desert, Calif.97260 Lear Vr. juke JoCrinerr, T ':Fart to thank you very munh for the future ordp-^ for _^ _m. Desert 210 limited. Following is a list ,of the natal al_ In" or(?.n'..^ed e rrnr n^K. n1n_!nder ^i'• i.rns Thu), uraq P inq Everrrepr true'" ano Ann- 0 1 n • o v 7-140'a'e&ts Tax _ n;no 7200.00 pOto.q't) 52°.6^ 933- ..0 -ll revire a 14000.on ryi}1ei:?.r.> e will bn `A W_ l l -�pe^i8..- _ __ ..n sparer; Z,llon ^ita.iners. This seven gallon size will sage you apnrox- imatelv,!i5000.00 verse; Zrowing thpm in a larger con- tainer. Yo;. ^ertioned in our ccnvorsation that you would take delivery on the oleanders in sixty days and the remain- der of the plant material in October 1978. We will follow thro4gh with this request unless otherwise notified. f �: i°,cerely yeur.^, kolpnd Schaeffer, Pre.e. ,n',.ec. rfer's Nursery Inc. Jn m /F 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE Nov. 1, 1978 APPLICANT PALM DESERT 210 LTD. P. 0. Box 1905 Newport Beach, CA 92663 CASE NO.: 131MF The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of Oct. 31, 1978. CONTINUED TO DENIED XX APPROVED BY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 422 PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF CONCURRENCE WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION. PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF FOR PUBLIC HEARING. Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Environmental Services, City of Palm Desert, within fi (15) days of the date of the decision. 7 ,W PAUL A. WILLIAMS, SECRETARY PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSSION cc: Applicant C.V.C.W.D. File PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 422 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, ANNOUNCING FINDINGS AND APPROVING THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTIONS OF OCTOBER 24, 1978. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did review the Design Review Board actions of October 24, 1978, approving: Case No. 149MF - Request for approval of preliminary plans for an apartment complex for R. RICCIARDI (L. H. Maddy); Case No. 150MF - Request for approval of preliminary plans for an apartment complex for R. RICCIARDI (L. H. Maddy); Case No. 131MF - Request for final plans for Mobile Home Sub- division for PALM DESERT 210 LTD.; Case No. 123MF - Request for approval of tennis court resubmittal for DEEP CANYON TENNIS CLUB HOMEOWNERS' ASSOC.: WHEREAS, at this time, upon considering and receiving all testi- mony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said Commission did find sufficient facts and reasons to exist to approve the Design Review Board actions of October 24, 1978. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and consti- tute the findings of the Commission in this case. 2. That it does hereby approve the Design Review Board actions of October 24, 1978, subject to the attached revisions as noted in the minutes of that meeting. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 31st day of October, 1978, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Berkey, Kelly, Kryder, Snyder NOES: Fleshman ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None GLORIA KELLY, Chairman ATTEST: " ^^ � -vim&:-. PAUL A. WILLIAMS, Secretary /ks Minutes Palm Desert Planning Commission October 31, 1978 Page Nine VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS (Cont.) H. Case Nos. C/Z 12-78 & DP 16-78 (Cont.) Special Condition No. 8.g. - The transition from com- mercial to residential should be by means of high land- scaped berm areas (in addition to the proposed walls). The treatment on the commercial side of the property should be carried over and unified with perimeter treat- ment on the residential development. On a motion by Commissioner Berkey, seconded by Commissioner Kryder, the Commission recommended approval of the Change of Zone to the City Council from 'S' Study to PR-4, S.P.(U.A) on 309.5 acres, and PC(2), S.P. (U.A.) on 9.0 acres, and P (U.A.) on 1.5 acres, and a related Development Plan for 320 acres with the noted revisions to the Resolution and the Conditions of Approval by Planning Commis- sion Resolution No. 421; carried (4-1) AYES: Berkey, Kelly, Kryder, Snyder; NOES: Fleshman VII. OLD BUSINESS - None VIII. NEW BUSINESS - None IX. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ITEMS A. Consideration of Cases acted on by the Design Review Board at their meeting of October 24, 1978. Mr. Crump reviewed the cases and noted the revisions as suggested by the Design Review Board for Case Nos. 15011F & 149MF. Commissioner Fleshman commente e side elevations could be dressed up a little. Regarding Case o. 131MF - there was some discussion, about the wall re- quired, and the rs to be placed in front of it to help control the sand problem. Case No. 123MF was reviewed. On a motion by Commissioner Kryder, seconded by Commissioner Berkey, the Commission approved the actions of the Design Review Board by Planning Commission Resolution No. 422; carried (4-1) AYES: Berkey, Kelly, Kryder, Snyder; NOES: Fleshman X. DISCUSSION ITEMS Mr. Williams noted a referral from the City Council on Case No. C/Z 09-78 and DP 13-78, LEWIS HOMES OF CALIFORNIA, Applicant. He noted three alternatives that the Commission could take on the referral at this time. option. BETTY WILLIAMS, Rep. of Lewis Homes, spoke to the Commission and stated that some of the lots on the north side could have their own pools. She also stated that Lewis Homes does not want to appear to be in constant conflict with the Planning Commission, they want to work with the Commission and the City. Commissioner Berkey asked if she would agree with the third Mrs. Williams replied whatever is best, she will agree. Commissioner Snyder stated that the City worked very hard on the College of the Desert Specific Plan and the area should remain PR-4. He suggested that more land be given to the City and then the PR-4 would be possible. He also stated the the applicant knew the problems of the area, with regard to drainage, when the land was purchased. Minutes Palm Desert Planning Commission October 31, 1978 Page Ten X. DISCUSSION ITEMS (Cont.) Commissioner Fleshman asked if the Commission's comments could be forwarded to the City Council at this time so that each time this item comes before either body there is not a battle. Mr. Williams stated it would be better to forward comments after the case is reviewed further by the Planning Commission. It was suggested that option three be taken and the case scheduled for consideration on November 15, 1978. Commissioner Kryder stated that the Council should know that the Commission still wants PR-4, but that it will still be discussed on November 15, 1978. Alternative C was unanimously accepted by the Commission. XI. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS - None XII. COMMENTS A. City Staff - None B. City Attorney - None C. Planning Commissioners Commissioner Kryder asked if items like the Lewis Homes item, could not be discussed earlier in the meeting so as to not keep people waiting. XIII. ADJOURNMENT On a motion by Commissioner Snyder, seconded.by Commissioner Kryder, the meeting was adjourned at 11:25 p.m.; carried unanimously (5-0). PAUL A. WILLIAMS, Secretary ATTEST: GLORIA KELLY, Chairman /ks DATE: October 24, 1978 CASE NO.: 131 MF APPLICANT: Palm Desert 210 Ltd LOCATION: Portola Golf Estates Mobile Home Subdiviston ZONING: R-M, R-M,S.H. In compliance with the conditions of approval for the Conditional Use Permit (CUP-10-78), the applicant has filed detail plans for review through the ORB process. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Recommend to the Planning Commission, approval of submitted plans with the following revisions: A. Site and Landscape Plans: 1. Provide landscaping along the pedestrian connections to the golf course subject to staff approval. 2. Provide 6 ft. high masonry wall along north propertyline or the proposed chain link with the addition of: a) Slumpstone pilasters at the corners and at twenty foot centers. b) Provide pyrocantha on the south side of fence at 10 ft. O.C. 3. Provide a street tree per lot in conformance with Municipal Code requirements.(Subdivision Ordinance) 4. Provide a golf cart path plan including typical cross-section to the Staff for consideration and approval. B, Detail Plans for Recreation areas. Lot 205 1. If proposed tennis court is to be lighted, it shall be recessed 3 ft. and lighting details shall be filed with the DRB for consideration and approval. 2. Provide a minimum of five off-street parking spaces approximately 25 ft. southeast of lot 220 to Ordinance standards. Int 2nR 1. Provide a minimum of 20 ft. setback between proposed pool area and Brodie Road. Said area shall be landscaped subject to staff approval. I.AiW 1. It may be useful for the Board to review the colored drawing from the CUP file in their deliberations. (CUP 10-77) 2. The pictures submitted by the applicant may also be useful to the Board. They particularly show that the existing landscaping along Portola Avenue justifies their request for an alternative to a wall in this area. CITY OF =ALM DESERT \. BUILDINGS iAFETY DEPT. BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION 45-Z75 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 PHONE (714) 346-0611 aoN ADDRESS AU E —UlrLOT MO. BLOCK TRACT PARCEL Q CONTRACT R a .. AD ESS ADD E S �l CI Z Cow CITY TEL. f^, v zs M0. , Tel./No. CITY LIC. NO STATE E LIC. NO VALIDATION CK. CASH NQ B 4601 LORGOr wal /waansd Use of Building L LC [I NEW ❑ADDITION ❑ALTERATION ❑REPAIR ❑MOVE ❑DEMOLI R ❑SIGN ❑GRADING FEES CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE PLAN CHECK FEES I et FL. Sp. Ft 0 2nd FL. SR. Ft, g Per. SR. Ft. Gar. Sq. Ft. B Car. P. Sp. Ft. Wall 'Y_J dl Y r) Sy. Ft. Q I V Sp. Ft. m EST. CONSTRUCTION VALUATION BUILDING EXCISE TAX CONSTRUCTION PERMIT FEE GRADING Sell FEE MICROFILM FEE JOB VALUATION FEE $ _ SPECIAL INSPECTION NOTE Not to be used as Property tax valuation Lot Size Zone Coss No. I I I Grp. Type I Fire Zone TOTAL FEES SPECIAL CONDITIONS Fire Sprinklers Na. of Required ❑Yee ❑No Drell ing Units Yes Max. Mo.-Load BUILDING APPROVALS APPLICATION AOCEFTED NY: L FLANS CHECKED BY: J AP M. IS3UANCFey ' I. Sat Back 2 Footings S Forms - 2 A Slab Grade NOT[ ; SEPARATE PERMITS E REQUIRED FOR: MS, GR ING, SPECIA INSPECTIONS, ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING, ATING, VENTILATING OR AIR CONDITIONING, SWIM POOLS, FENCING. THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 120 DAYS, OR IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS -SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 120 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. I corlify that I nays read rhm application and fate that the information is c.rrdat. 1 acres Io comply with all CITY ORDINANCES and STATE LAWS realism to construa- %... 1 entity loll In w,far ..... .t ems,. work I ehall not employ any harden in rlolallos of tee LABOR CODE OF CALIFORNIA ralatinp to Workm.n•e Camww.it.. 10........ 3 Steel 4 Grout Blacks S Bond Beams 6 Roof Data 7 Framing B Vents 9 Garage Firs Wall 10 Fireplace P. L. ❑ 10 A Fireplace T.O. ❑ I I Exterior Loth i USE D CONTRAC ON AUTHORIZED AGENT (DATE) 12 Interior Lath 12 A Drywall 316MATURI OF OWNER ( If ONnr Smile.,) (DATE) 13 Finish Grade APPROVAL FOR FINAL PLAN DIV. PUB-WKS. BUILD.DIV. FIRE DEPT 14 INSULATION IS Sound Attenuation 16 17 Final ENTRIES ON REVERSE: CPO/.1./75 BUILDING DIVISION 14e&g qcocce ezgmarzuae4&9 PHONE - 329-8731 WORK SHEET Name Address Job Location . Cnorifiratinne: DATE /C�— —___ _ F`�e � l0 8 -•� -Feet High ie Llne Pat Terms 3�a Gatea -,� 3azSlOOp Cement End s Spring With Knuckle Up [riven Gets Drag Pork With Ovt SpecialNote: N l I I i• t .... s L 7 PAT .M rrcci•"��1 Lv\'(MJNI L,r' AL EFRVIcIb Ti; ' - '-`("ION GT EL;;LLlT;G _E tt0 THIS / Oy>I EEC MES NUII t. �C'.c� f�T� TIO I nT REC .kDEDWlTHih, I A c Ait Y✓CP.K, SH..IL E ° E DO JE 11 \b'A" '1ED PLANS. THIS AP'VR'=��r1NSTRUED TO Bc A PERMIT FCR, ;.v a: c.('�•�eNY ✓IOIATION OF ANY Of TM �_-OF STA E & GTY Ot 1\ANM ,� - �* _• j%�- '.I L. OF APVR ✓EJ PLANS J �- f L r UNTIL 'CMPI-TED, i .ti I AUTHORIZE FOR ADDITIONAL LABOR AND .0 BE ADDS TO MY CONTRACT. BY: r 1;X (�'Ut'crs� oil nnm. �r�f 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION APPLICANT Palm Desert 210 Ltd. f M•R Newport Beach CA 92663 CASE No.: CUP 10-77 (Amend) a d 131MF The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of July 5, 1978 CONTINUED TO DENIED XX APPROVED BY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 379 PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF CONCURRENCE WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION. PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF FOR PUBLIC HEARING. Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Environmental Services, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. PAUL A. 14ILLIAMS, SECRETARY PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSSION cc: Applicant C.V.C.W.D. File Minutes Palm Desert Planning Commission July 5, 1978 Page Eleven VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS (Cont.) I. Case No. C/Z 03-78, CATHOLIC BISHOP OF SAN DIEGO, Applicant Request for approval of a Change of Zone from R-1 r 9,000 (Single-family residential, minimum 9,000 sq. ft. lots) to R-2 (Single-family residential, minimum 4,000 sq. ft. lot area/du) on approximately 7.9 acres located west of Deep Canyon Avenue, north of 44th Avenue. Mr. Williams reviewed the case and noted that Staff recommended approval of the Change of Zone. Chairman Berkey declared the Public Hearing open and asked if the applicant would like to speak at this time. The applicant was not present. Chairman Berkey asked if anyone wished to speak in FAVOR or in OPPOSITION to the proposed Change of Zone. Being none, he de- clared the Public Hearing closed and asked for the pleasure of the Commission. Commissioner Fleshman noted that the R-2 zone was not appro- priate and that a PR-4 to PR-5 range would be better, also he would like to see the Development Plan. Commissioner Kelly stated that the applicant should be sent the reasons for this case being denied as the zoning is not appropriate. On a motion by Commissioner Fleshman, seconded by Commissioner Snyder, the Commission denied the Change of Zone request by Planning Commission Resolution No. 378; carried unanimously (5-0). J. Case No. CUP 10-77(Amend) a d 131 - Applicant Request for approval of an Amendment Conditional Use Permit to provide for 11 lots within an existing mobilehome within the R-M zone. PALM DESERT 210 Ltd., to an approved an additional subdivision Mr. Williams reviewed the case and noted the concerns of the Design Review Board. There was some discussion about the size of the fairways and the relationships to the greens and tees. Chairman Berkey declared the Public Hearing open and asked if the applicant would like to speak at this time. The applicant was not present. Chairman Berkey then asked if there was anyone wishing to speak in FAVOR or in OPPOSITION to the proposed cases. Being none, he declared the Public Hearing closed and asked for the pleasure of the Commission. On a motion by Commissioner Kryder, seconded by Commissioner Kelly, the Commission approved the cases by Planning Commission Resolu- tion No. 379; carried (3-2) (AYES: Berkey, Kelly, Kryder; NOES: Snyder, Fleshman). K. Case Nos. C/Z 06-78, CUP 07-78 and 83C - HAROLD KAPP, Applicant Request for approval of a Change of Zone from R-1 and R-3(4) to R-3 9,000 on approximately .24 acres on the east side of Portola, between San Marino Circle and Alessandro Street and approval of a related Conditional Use Permit and Preliminary Design Review to allow the construction of a park- ing lot on said site. Minutes Palm Desert Planning Commission July 5, 1978 Page Thirteen VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS (Cont.) L. Case No. DP 07-78 an 123:MF)- DEEP CANYON TENNIS CLUB HOMEOWNERS' ASSOCIAT pplicant Request for approval of an Amendment to the approved Development Plan for the Deep Canyon Tennis Club and preliminary Design Review to provide for the addition iof two tennis courts at the Deep Canyon Tennis Club. Mr. Williams reviewed the cases and noted the concerns of the Design Review Board and noted that the Design Review Board had requested that the courts be recessed 4 feet. Chairman Berkey declared the Public Hearing open and asked if the applicant would like to speak at this time. ROBERT BARNES, President of Deep Canyon Tennis Club Homeowners' Association, noted his disagreement with recessing the courts 4 feet. GREG ERICKSON, Vice President of J. M. Peters, Architect for the project, stated that he had not been notified of the Design Review Board meeting. He noted that the additional cost to recess the tennis courts would be about $10,000. Would like to be able to go back to the Design Review Board if the problem cannot be solved at this meeting. Commissioner Kryder stated that if it is costly then the Design Review Board should reconsider. Commissioner Fleshman asked the applicant if he could compromise and lower the courts 2 feet. Mr. Erickson stated that the retaining wall would also be very costly if this approach was used. Mr. Cipriani noted that the applicant had first submitted this case several months ago and due to the complete plans not being sub- mitted it had been delayed. It is the applicant's responsibility to check on the Design Review Board meeting date under these circumstances. There was some discussion as to the height of the fence and the material to be used. Also there was some concerned mentioned for the scenic highway view along Highway 74. An addition to Special Condition No. 2 was suggested to read as follows: as not to be visible from Highway 74 frontage. Commissioner Fleshman asked if there would be more landscaping than there is at present. Mr. Erickson stated that there would be. On a motion by Commissioner Kryder, seconded by Commissioner Fleshman, the cases were approved with the addition to Special Condi- tion No. 2 by Planning Commission Resolution No. 382; carried unani- mously (5-0). VIII. OLD BUSINESS - None I - Minutes Palm Desert Planning Commission July 5, 1978 Page Nine VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS (Cont.) F. Case Nos. CUP 06-78 an 1;2M'1�)CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF THE LATTER DAY SAINT icant Request for approval of a Conditional Use Permit and a Preliminary Design Review to allow a 26,000 sq. ft. 26.75 high church building with a 77' spire and related Sunday School classrooms on a 3.66 acre parcel located at the northwest corner of Park View Drive and Monterey Avenue within the PR-7, S.P. zone and approval of a Variance to permit a 77 foot tall spire where 55 feet is the maximum height permitted by the Zoning Ordinance. Mr. Williams reviewed the cases and noted the concerns of the Design Review Board with regard to spire and the continuation of the meandering bike path. Chairman Berkey asked if Standard Condition No. 1 should state that the case will go back before the Design Review Board. Mr. Cipriani noted that the case was continued by the Design Review Board so they will be reviewing it again. Commissioner Kelly suggested that Special Condition No. 10 be combined with Special Condition No. 6. Chairman Berkey declared the Public Hearing open and asked if the applicant would like to speak at this time. OTTO KORVER, 1110 S. Robertson, Los Angeles, stated that the main part of the tower was 59 feet high, which could be cut to 55 feet, the tower is tapered up till the last two feet which is a lightning rod. Commissioner Snyder noted that he believed that the highest point in the City had to have a red light on top of it. Mr. Korver had no objection to this. He then asked about the right-of-way as stated in Special Condition No. 4 and the mounding as noted in Special Condition No. 10. Mr. Williams noted that the figure in Special Condition No. 4 should be 110 feet not 126, and with regard to the mounding, 3 feet would be sufficient. Chairman Berkey asked if there was anyone wishing to speak in FAVOR of the project. PAUL PAYNE, 208 Michelle, Palm Springs, stated that if the tower is lowered it would be out of proportion with the building and it would be better to delete it if the maximum is 551. He asked to have the traffic safety lighting explained. Mr. Williams stated that the Director of Public Works intent is that the intersection and the driveways be lite. Chairman Berkey asked if there was anyone wishing to speak in OPPOSITION of the project. Being none, he declared the Public Hearing closed and asked for the pleasure of the Commission. Minutes Palm Desert Planning Commission July 5, 1978 Page Ten VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS (Cont.) F. Case Nos. CUP 06-78 and 132MF (Cont.) Chairman Berkey noted that since the Design Review Board had continued the case, the Commission should not be considering it and Special Condition No. 8 should be deleted and left up to the Design Review Board. Commissioner Fleshman noted that the spire should be left as proposed or not at all, the building will speak for itself. Commissioner Kryder stated that the 77 ft. spire is necessary for the architecture of the building and to eliminate it the building might loose impact, and noted his approval of the Variance request. Commissioner Snyder stated that he agreed that the spire was an important part of the church but that we do have an ordinance and a Design Review Board, so let the architect work it out with them. Commissioner Kelly suggested that just the CUP be approved and eliminate the Variance. Commissioner Snyder stated that the Variance should be denied and adopt the Resolution as written but leave the spire up to the Design Review Board. Mr. Williams advised the applicant that the next Design Review Board meeting was July 11, 1978, at 5:30 p.m. and that they would need a sample material board. On a motion by Commissioner Snyder, seconded by Commissioner Fleshman, the Commission approve the Conditional Use Permit with the noted changes to the Conditions of Approval and denied the re- quest for a Variance by Planning Commission Resolution No. 376; carried (4-1) (AYES: Berkey, Fleshman, Kelly, Snyder; NOES: Kryder). G. Case No. VAR 04-78, CLIFFORD W. HENDERSON, Applicant Chairman Berkey noted that the applicant had request that the case be continued due to the lateness of the evening. On a motion by Commissioner Kelly, seconded by Commissioner Snyder, the Commission continued the case to the meeting of July 19, 1978; carried (4-1) (AYES: Berkey, Kelly, Kryder, Snyder; NOES: Fleshman). H. Case No. C/Z 04-78, COVE CONSTRUCTION, Applicant Request for a Change of Zone from PR-5, S.P. and PR-5 to R-1 12,000 on a parcel approximately 75 acres in size generally located east of Highway 74, between Homestead Road and Portola Avenue. Mr. Williams reviewed the case and noted that the Staff re- commended approval of the Change of Zone but that S.P. should be added to the R-1 12,000 designation on the map and on the resolution Chairman Berkey declared the Public Hearing open and asked if the applicant would like to speak at this time. ED WRIGHT, President of Cove Construction, noted his agreement with the Staff Report. Chairman Berkey asked if there was anyone wishing to speak in FAVOR or in OPPOSITION to the proposed Change of Zone. Being none, he declared the Public Hearing closed and asked for the pleasure of the Commission. On a motion by Commissioner Kryder, seconded by Commissioner Kelly, the Commission approve the Change of Zone by Planning Commission Resolution No. 377; carried unanimously (5-0). A Minutes Palm Desert Planning Commission July 5, 1978 VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS (Cont.) B. Case Nos. C/Z 02-78 and related Draft EIR TOM O'SULLIVAN, stated that he opposed the project due to the traffic problems and the access to the property. Page Six (font.) Chairman Berkey stated that the present R-1 would create more access to Alamo and that this proposal allows for control. At this time Chairman Berkey declared the Public Hearing closed and asked for the pleasure of the Commission. Commissioner Fleshman stated that the easiest access for most of the residents of the project would be to use the Alamo entrance/exit; PR is preferred to R-1; all questions and concerns noted at this hearing should be better clarified; and, no more than 200 of the traffic should be directed to Alamo. Commissioner Flesh - man proposed a PR-3 zone. Commissioner Kelly stated that she like Commissioner Flesh- man's proposal; against the higher density; planned residential is only workable zoning for the parcle. Commissioner Snyder noted that the presentation and the EIR were both very complete but he is concerned with the flood control and the obligation of the City. The work that needs to be done in the City is beyond the scope of the applicant. Planned residential is good for the area. Commissioner Kryder stated that he concurred with Commissioner r Snyder and that the EIR is so complete that it defeats itself in a L sense. He noted his continued concern for projects being approved prior to the completion of flood control in the City. Chairman Berkey stated that he liked Commissioner Fleshman's approach and that he was concerned with the zone change and the in- crease in density. The PR-3 is a good solution. On a motion by Commissioner Fleshman to recommend to the City Council a Change of Zone of PR-3 and to certify the EIR as complete by Planning Commission Resolution No. 374, seconded by Commissioner Kelly; carried (4-1) (AYES: Berkey, Fleshman, Kelly, Kryder; NOES: Snyder). THERE WAS A BRIEF RECESS AT 9:40 P.M. THE MEETING WAS RECDNVEQED AT 9:50 P.M. V C. Continued Case Nos. DP 09-78 a 126MF CHACAHUALA LTD., Applicant Request for approval of a revised Development Plan and Preliminary Design Review for a 131-unit condo- minium project on approximately 38 acres located south of Little Bend Trail and north of Mesa View extended between Alamo and Arrow Trail. Chairman Berkey asked the applicant if they would like to continue this case due to the action on the Change of Zone. Mr. Williams noted that to consider the project is meaningless as it does not form to the approved zoning. He also noted that the issue of the Development Plan goes into limbo until the zoning is acted on by the City Council on July 27, 1978. Mr. Williams recommended that the Cases be continued to the August 1, 1978, meeting. f Minutes Palm Desert Planning Commission July 5, 1978 Page Seven VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS (Cont.) C. Case Nos. DP 09-78 and 126MF (Cont.) Commissioner Fleshman noted the following items that would be needed prior to the cases being discussed or acted on: Detail of road crossing the channel; detail of all exterior walls and how they relate to adjacent property; specifics on channel and how it will carry the water; the units on Arrow Trail are not appropriate; need 40 ft. setbacks along Silver Spur area; no more than 2 units joined together; minimum 1,600 to 2,100 sq. ft. units are appropriate as proposed; and, circulation, no more than 20% of the units should exit on Alamo. On a motion by Commissioner Snyder, seconded by Commissioner Fleshman, the cases were continued to the meeting of August 1, 1978; carried unanimously (5-0). D. Case Nos. C/Z 05-78, C/Z 05-78(EIR), DP 10-78, and 133MF, BUREAU OF TEACHER AID AND RETIREMENT SERVICES, Applicant. Mr. Williams noted that a written request for a continuance had been received and Staff recommended that the cases be continued to the August 1st meeting. On a motion by Commissioner Snyder, seconded by Commissioner Fleshman, the cases were continued to August 1, 1978; carried unani- mously (5-0). Commissioner Fleshman left the room due to a conflict of interest. E. Case No. TT 12784, SILVER SPUR ASSOCIATES, Applicant Request for approval of a Tentative Map which would create a 2-lot subdivision to provide for 100 air- space condominiums and recreational amenities on approximately 10 acres within the PR-7 zone located north of Irontree Drive, west of Mariposa Drive and south of Foxtail Lane. Mr. Williams reviewed the case and noted points of the proposed Development Plan. He pointed out the memorandum received from the Fire Marshal and letters freceived regarding concerns with the density and traffic. Mr. Williams noted Staff's recommendation of approval and reviewed the various conditions of approval. Chairman Berkey asked if density was part of the approval sought. Mr. Williams noted that it was. Chairman Berkey declared the Public Hearing open and asked if the applicant wished to speak at this time. LARRY SPICER, representing Ironwood Country Club, stated that this project was not proposed as a downgrade to the present area. Chairman Berkey asked if there was anyone wishing to speak in FAVOR of the proposal. Being none, he asked if anyone wished to speak in OPPOSITION to the project. MIKE BAGNAL, President of Homeowners Association #2, stated that he was concerned with the parking on Foxtail, as it is already a problem; the density would be 30% than the present zoning; would like more open space and amenities; and, the number of tennis courts would not be sufficient for the number of total units. 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION REPORT Date: June 22, 1978 REPORT ON: Mobile Home Subdivision Expansion CASE NO.: 131MF ZONE: R-M LOCATION: Portola Country Club APPLICANT: PALM DESERT 210 LTD. NATURE OF APPROVAL SOUGHT: Site Plan DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION: After reviewing the submitted plans and the presentations by the staff and by the applicant, the DRB APPROVED this project, subject to the attached conditions. Date of Action Motion Made By Seconded By: Vote: June 20, 1978 Leung Jackson 5-0 Reasons for Negative Vote (s): (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen (W days of the date of the decision.) STAFF COMMENTS: DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE: June 20, 1978 CASE NO.: 131MF APPLICANT: PALM DESERT 210 LTD. LOCATION: Portola Country Club ZONING: R-M STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve the proposed additional lots. �3 DESIGN -REVIEW', CONDITIONS CASE NO. 131MF AGREEMENT I accept and agree, prior to use of this permit or approval, to comply with all the conditions set forth, and understand that the Department of Building and Safety will not issue a building permit or allow oc- cupancy on the use permitted until this signed confirmation has been received by the Department of Environmental Services. (Applicant's Signature) �.L G 7 It- ,&MS' E(M&MM, YOB MR9 ***DESIGN REVIEW BOARD*** DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION PALM DESERT 210 LTD. Applicant I woose mno P.O. BOX 1905 714-642-3092 Mailing Address Telephone NEWPORT BEACH, CA. 92663 City State Zip- Code REQUEST: (Describe specific nature of approval requested) ADDITIONAL 11 LOTS FOR EXISTING MOBILEHOME SUBDIVISION TRACT 11215-1 PORTOLA COUNTRY CLUB, PALM DESERT. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: MOBILEHOME SUBDIVISION ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. EXISTING ZONING RM 621-400-01$ Property Owner Authorization THE UNDERSIGNED STATES THAT THEY ARE THE OWNER IS) OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN AND HEREBY GIVE AUTHOR- IZATION ynFOR __THE FILING OOF THIS APPLICATION. �/ �/%��� / SIGNATU / DATE ABSOLVING THE CITY OF PALM DESERT OF ALL LI BY MY SIGNATURE ON THIS AGREEM pplic nts Signature 2/a, C7,1 (FOR STAFF USE ONLY) ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS ❑ MINISTERIAL ACT E.A. No. ❑ CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION ❑ NEGATIVE DECLARATION ❑ OTHER RELATIVE TO ANY DEED RESTRICTIONS. SOLVE THE CITY OF PALM DESERT OF ALL LIABILITIES REGARDING ANY DEED RES- CTIONA THAT MAY BE APPLICABLE TO THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN. 6_2 -- DATE GATE ACCEPTED BY CASE No. /6 / %a F REFERENCE CASE NO. The Design Review Board process is the method by which the City of Palm Desert reviews detailed design and construction plans prior to the issuance of a building permit. FENCES,POOLS e DEPARTMENT DESIGN n PLANNING APPLICATION OF ENVIRON- REVIEW (—\ COMMISSION MENTAL BOARD (APPROVES OR SERVICES (ADVISORY) DENIES PROJECT) STAFF INTERIOR REMODELS, MINOR ELECTRICAL, MECHANICAL, OR PLUMBING PERMITS STAFF USE ONLY: DEPARTMENT t� BUILDING AND r\CONSTRUCT- SAFETY L ION Date Received Date of ACTOR Meeting ACTION APPLICANT NOTIFIED Staff DRB P.C. C.C. Department of Environmental Services Form 1 CITY OF PALM DESERT APPLICATION FORM DESIGN REVIEW BOARD PROCESS Design Review of: PALM DESERT 210 LTD. APPLICANT CASE NO. Agreement of compliance to be signed by those applying for review. I hereby acknowledge that I have read and agree, to comply with all the following requirements, and understand that the Department of Building and Safety will not issue a building permit or allow occupancy on the use permitted until this signed confirmation has been received by the Department of Environmental Services. The development of this project shall conform substantially to all development plans submitted in behalf of this case, and as revised according to the Design Review Board process. Any minor change requires approval by the Director of Envi- ronmental Services. Any substantial change requires ap- proval by the Design Review Board. All requirements of any law, ordinance, or regulation of the State, City, and any other applicable government entity shall be complied with as part of the development process. This approval is applicable, subject to the development of this project, commencing within one year from approval date and being promptly completed. Landscaping (with irrigation system) shall be installed prior to final inspection and receiving certificate of occupancy. Curb, gutter, curb cuts, and tie-in paving shall be provided along the full frontage of the lot by means of installation prior to final inspection or other provisions as approved by the City Engineer. Construction shall conform to City Stan- dards and all requirements of the City Engineer. Department of Environmental Services Form 1 ,. 6� !���f/x:7 3 N 1. I , �ii 11 awn AV PLANTING AREA DETAIL (TYPICAL) #iJj= .53 W-V `. &moo ` %now %we ffl�% OVERALL & TREE PLANTING PLAN CITY OF PALM DESERT DEPART,'�ENT OF L APPRO'v El L rx HIBIT NO. r i CASE N 2!. CO#48-rZ WIT A ONE YEAR C;� TOiS APPROVAL. pill Cat "nuvAL.