Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2023-04-11 ARC Regular Meeting Agenda PacketCity of Palm Desert Page 1 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA AGENDA (HYBRID MEETING) City Hall, Development Services Conference Room 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 Pursuant to Assembly Bill 2449, this meeting will be a hybrid meeting with in-person public access to the meeting location. OPTIONS FOR PARTICIPATING IN THIS MEETING: •Attend the meeting in the Development Services Conference Room at Palm Desert City Hall, 73510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, CA 92260. •To participate via Zoom, use the following link: https://palmdesert.zoom.us/j/83648797515, Zoom Webinar ID: 836 4879 7515. •To participate by telephone call (213) 338-8477 or (669) 219-2599, Zoom Webinar ID: 836 4879 7515. To provide a public comment please press *9 to raise your hand. •Written public comment may also be submitted to planning@palmdesert.gov. Emails received by 9:30 a.m. prior to the meeting will be distributed to the Commission. Any correspondence received during or after the meeting will be distributed to the Commission as soon as practicable and retained for the official record. Emails will not be read aloud except as an ADA accommodation. 1.CALL TO ORDER 2.ROLL CALL 3.NON-AGENDA PUBLIC COMMENT: This time has been set aside for the public to address the Architectural Review Commission on issues that are not on the agenda for up to three minutes. Because the Brown Act does not allow the Commission to act on items not listed on the agenda, members may briefly respond or refer the matter to staff for a report and recommendation at a future meeting. 4.CONSENT CALENDAR: All matters listed on the Consent Calendar are considered routine and may be approved by one motion. The public may comment on any items on the Consent Agenda within the three-minute time limit. Individual items may be removed by Commissioners for a separate discussion. Tuesday April 11, 2023 12:30 p.m. Regular Meeting Page 1 of 66 Architectural Review Commission Agenda April 11, 2023 City of Palm Desert Page 2 A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Architectural Review Commission Regular Meeting minutes of March 28, 2023. B. CASE NO: SARC23-0003 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Consideration to approve a Design Review for a multi-tenant monument sign for a new commercial building located at 72310 Highway 111. APPLICANT AND ADDRESS: Western Sign & Awning, San Marcos, CA 92078 LOCATION: 72310 Highway 111 ZONE: Regional Commercial Center, Scenic Preservation (P.C.-3) RECOMMENDATION: 1. The ARC determines that the requirements of the findings have been met based on the analysis and approves the Design Review as proposed. C. CASE NO: SARC23-0002 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Consideration to approve a Signage Design Review for the addition of one (1) new awning and replacement of two (2) new awnings and signage for an existing Ulta beauty store located at 72369 Highway 111, Suite 100. APPLICANT AND ADDRESS: Jeanine Wilson, Valley Glen, CA 91401 LOCATION: 72369 Highway 111, Suite 100 ZONE: Regional Commercial Center (P.C.-3) RECOMMENDATION: 1. Staff recommends the ARC determines that the requirements of the findings have been met based on the analysis and approves the Design Review as presented. CONSENT ITEMS HELD OVER: Items removed from the Consent Calendar for separate discussion will be considered at this time. 5. ACTION CALENDAR A. FINAL DRAWINGS 1. CASE NO: MISC22-0020 (Continued from March 28, 2023) NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Consideration to approve a design review of a private sport court on a residential property at 45710 Verba Santa Drive. APPLICANT AND ADDRESS: Richard Leventhal, Palm Desert, CA 92260 LOCATION: 45710 Verba Santa Drive ZONE: R-1, 20,000 (Single Family Residential) Page 2 of 66 Architectural Review Commission Agenda April 11, 2023 City of Palm Desert Page 3 RECOMMENDATION: 1. The ARC continue the design review of the subject sports court and allow the Applicant up to 30 days to return to ARC for design review with the revised Noise Impact Assessment. 2. CASE NO: MISC23-0011 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Consideration to deny a Design Review for a façade modification to an existing Chuck E. Cheese restaurant and family entertainment center located at 72513 Highway 111, Suite B. APPLICANT AND ADDRESS: Lillia Sanchell, Lewisville, TX 75067 LOCATION: 72513 Highway 111, Suite B ZONE: Regional Commercial Center (P.C.-3) RECOMMENDATION: 1. The ARC deny the request for Design Review approval, determining the requirements of the findings have not been met. 3. CASE NO: MISC 23-0020 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Consideration to approve a design review for a façade modification to an existing retail storefront for Lululemon located at 73425 El Paseo, Suite 104. APPLICANT AND ADDRESS: Lululemon USA, Inc., Vancouver, BC V6B2W2 LOCATION: 73425 El Paseo, Suite 104 ZONE: Downtown Core Overlay (D-O) RECOMMENDATION: 1. The ARC determines that the requirements of the findings have been met based on the analysis and approves the Design Review. 6. NON-ACTION ITEMS None 7. INFORMATIONAL REPORTS & COMMENTS A. ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSIONERS B. CITY STAFF C. ATTENDANCE REPORT 8. ADJOURNMENT: The next Regular Meeting will be held on April 25, 2023, at 12:30 p.m. Page 3 of 66 Architectural Review Commission Agenda April 11, 2023 City of Palm Desert Page 4 AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING I hereby certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing agenda for the Architectural Review Commission was posted on the City Hall bulletin board and City website not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting. Melinda Gonzalez Recording Secretary PUBLIC NOTICES Agenda Related Materials: Pursuant to Government Code §54957.5(b)(2) the designated office for inspection of records in connection with this meeting is the Development Services Department, City Hall, 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert. Staff reports for all agenda items and documents provided to a majority of the legislative bodies are available for public inspection at City Hall and on the City’s website at www.palmdesert.gov. Americans with Disabilities Act: It is the intention of the City of Palm Desert to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) in all respects. If, as an attendee or a participant at this meeting, or in meetings on a regular basis, you will need special assistance beyond what is normally provided, the city will attempt to accommodate you in every reasonable manner. Please contact the Office of the City Clerk, (760) 346-0611, at least 48 hours prior to the meeting to inform us of your needs and to determine if accommodation is feasible. Page 4 of 66 City of Palm Desert Page 1 ALL ACTIONS ARE DRAFT, PENDING APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA MINUTES (HYBRID MEETING) Pursuant to Assembly Bill 2449, this meeting will be a hybrid meeting with in-person public access to the meeting location. 1. CALL TO ORDER A Regular Meeting of the Architectural Review Commission (ARC) was called to order by Chair Vuksic on Tuesday, March 28, 2023, at 12:30 p.m. in the Development Services Conference Room, City Hall, located at 73510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California. 2. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Dean Wallace Colvard, Nicholas Latkovic, Michael McAuliffe, Vice Chair Jim McIntosh, Francisco Sanchez, and Chair John Vuksic. Absent: None City Staff Present: Richard Cannone, Director of Development Services; Rosie Lua, Deputy Director of Development Services; Nick Melloni, Principal Planner; Audrey Nickerson, Associate Planner II; Nikki Gomez, Assistant Planner; and Melinda Gonzalez, Recording Secretary, were present at Roll Call. 3. NON-AGENDA PUBLIC COMMENT Chair Vuksic opened and closed the non-agenda public comment period. No public comments were provided. 4. CONSENT CALENDAR Associated staff reports, memos, attachments, and discussion on the following items can be viewed by visiting the Architectural Review Commission Information Center website at, https://www.palmdesert.gov/our-city/committees-and-commissions/commission-information. Chair Vuksic opened and closed the public comment period for the Consent Calendar. No public comments were provided. MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LATKOVIC, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER COLVARD, CARRIED 6-0; to approve the consent calendar. Tuesday March 28, 2023 12:30 p.m. Regular Meeting Page 5 of 66 Architectural Review Commission Minutes March 28, 2023 City of Palm Desert Page 2 ALL ACTIONS ARE DRAFT, PENDING APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LATKOVIC, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER COLVARD, CARRIED 6-0; to approve the Architectural Review Commission Regular Meeting minutes of March 14, 2023. B. CASE NO: SARC23-0001 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Consideration of a design review to replace two (2) existing monument signs for the Hilton Grand Vacation Club located at 1 Willow Ridge. APPLICANT AND ADDRESS: Signarama, Palm Desert, CA 92211 LOCATION: 1 Willow Ridge ZONE: Planned Residential – 5 units per acre (P.R.-5) MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LATKOVIC, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER COLVARD, CARRIED 6-0; to approve Case No. SARC23-0001 as presented. CONSENT ITEMS HELD OVER None 5. ACTION CALENDAR Associated staff reports, memos, attachments, and discussion on the following items can be viewed by visiting the Architectural Review Commission Information Center website at, https://www.palmdesert.gov/our-city/committees-and-commissions/commission-information. A. FINAL DRAWINGS 1. CASE NO: MISC22-0020 (Continued from October 11, 2022) NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Consideration to approve a request for a design review of a private sport court on a residential property located at 45710 Verba Santa Drive. APPLICANT AND ADDRESS: Richard Leventhal, Palm Desert, CA 92260 LOCATION: 45710 Verba Santa Drive ZONE: R-1, 20,000 (Single Family Residential) Principal Planner, Nick Melloni, provided a summary of the case noting staff is requesting a continuance of the item. Richard Leventhal, Applicant, was present and provided a comment in favor of approving the case. Chair Vuksic opened the public comment period with no public comments provided. Page 6 of 66 Architectural Review Commission Minutes March 28, 2023 City of Palm Desert Page 3 ALL ACTIONS ARE DRAFT, PENDING APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES Chair Vuksic continued the public comment period to the next regularly scheduled ARC meeting on April 11, 2023. MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LATKOVIC, SECOND BY VICE CHAIR MCINTOSH, CARRIED 6-0; to continue the design review of the subject sports court until the next regularly scheduled ARC meeting on April 11, 2023. 2. CASE NOS: PP/CUP/EA23-0001 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Consideration to approve a Design Review and a recommendation of approval to the Planning Commission for a Precise Plan (PP) and Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to develop a 3,539 square-foot, single- story building within the Palm Desert Civic Center Campus located at the northeast corner of San Pablo Avenue and Fred Waring Drive (Assessor’s Parcel Number 622- 250-014). APPLICANT AND ADDRESS: Prest Vuksic Greenwood Architects, Palm Desert, CA 92260 LOCATION: Northeast corner of San Pablo Avenue and Fred Waring Drive (Assessor’s Parcel Number 622-250-014). ZONE: Public Institution (P) Chair Vuksic announced his recusal due to a conflict of interest as he is a member of the architectural firm retained for this project and left the conference room. Principal Planner, Nick Melloni, narrated a PowerPoint presentation on the item and responded to Commission inquiries. Nicole Williams with Prest Vuksic Greenwood Architects, Applicant, narrated a PowerPoint presentation providing additional details on the project and answered questions from the Commission. Vice Chair McIntosh opened and closed the public comment period. No public comments were provided. Discussion on the item ensued with Commissioners providing comments for the project. Following discussion, MOTION BY COMMISSIONER MCAULIFFE, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER SANCHEZ, CARRIED 5-0 (CHAIR VUKSIC ABSENT); to approve Case Nos. PP/CUP/EA23-0001 with the following condition: 1. All plumbing venting shall be concealed by parapets to ensure the architectural roof form remains clear of visible penetrations and roof drains. Chair Vuksic rejoined the meeting. 6. NON-ACTION ITEMS None Page 7 of 66 Architectural Review Commission Minutes March 28, 2023 City of Palm Desert Page 4 ALL ACTIONS ARE DRAFT, PENDING APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES 7. INFORMATIONAL REPORTS & COMMENTS A. ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSIONERS None B. CITY STAFF Principal Planner Melloni reported the ARC subcommittee for PP20-0002 (Former Pizza Hut) comprised of Vice Chair McIntosh and Commissioner Sanchez met with the applicant and found the final construction drawings to be in substantial conformance, therefore, a building permit was issued. Chair Vuksic and Commissioner Sanchez volunteered to form the ARC subcommittee to review final construction drawings for CarMax. Director of Development Services, Richard Cannone, reported a request for proposals was released for professional services to assist with establishing objective design standards. Staff received responses from two firms. Staff is currently evaluating the submittals and anticipate going before City Council to request an award of contract at the City Council meeting scheduled for April 27, 2023. C. ATTENDANCE REPORT The attendance report was provided with the agenda materials. The Commission took no action on this matter. 8. ADJOURNMENT The Architectural Review Commission adjourned at 1:16 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Melinda Gonzalez, Senior Administrative Assistant Recording Secretary ATTEST: Rosie Lua, Deputy Director of Development Services Secretary APPROVED BY ARC: __/__/2023 Page 8 of 66 CITY OF PALM DESERT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MEMORANDUM To: Honorable Chair and Members of the Commission From: Anna Dan, Assistant Planner Date: April 11, 2023 Case No(s): SARC23-0003 Subject: Consideration to approve a Design Review for a multi-tenant monument sign for a new commercial building located at 72310 Highway 111. BACKGROUND The Applicant, Tiffany Del Gatto, on behalf of Western Sign & Awning, is requesting approval of a new multi-tenant monument sign for a new commercial building located at 72310 Highway 111. The monument sign will replace an existing monument sign located in a landscaped area adjacent to Highway 111. The sign will be constructed out of an aluminum frame with a masonry base and decorative aluminum column. The monument sign will use materials to match the architecture of the approved commercial building. Additionally, the monument sign will feature internally backlit routed out name panels. PROJECT SUMMARY A. Property Description: The project site is a commercial building located on Highway 111, approximately 265 feet southeast of Fred Waring Drive within the Walmart Neighborhood Market center. The site is a 0.24-acre parcel containing one (1) single-story commercial building which will be demolished to construct a new 7,500 square-foot building. The site is zoned Regional Commercial Center, Scenic Preservation (P.C.-3, S.P.). The original building was entitled as part of the La Posada Center in 1989 by Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1379 for Case No. PP 89-21. The center currently has two monument signs along Highway 111. On December 15, 1992, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 1600 granting an exception to allow a secondary monument sign for the building. On December 21, 2021, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2801 approving a new 7,500-square-foot commercial/restaurant building per Case No. PP/CUP20-0002. The proposed monument sign would service this new development. Page 9 of 66 SARC23-0003 72310 Hwy 111 Monument Sign Page 2 of 5 April 11, 2023 B. Zoning, General Plan and Adjacent Uses: Table 1 – Adjacent Land Use and Designations Existing Uses General Plan Zoning Project Site Retail-commercial Regional Retail Regional Commercial Center, Scenic Preservation (P.C.-3) North Retail-commercial Regional Retail Regional Commercial Center, Scenic Preservation (P.C.-3) South Retail-commercial Regional Retail Regional Commercial Center, Scenic Preservation (P.C.-3) East Desert Crossings Shopping Center Regional Retail Regional Commercial Center, Scenic Preservation (P.C.-3) West Desert Crossings Shopping Center Regional Retail Regional Commercial Center, Scenic Preservation (P.C.-3) C. Project Description The project is a request to construct a new monument sign behind the meandering sidewalk fronting Highway 111. The project site was recently approved for new construction of a 7,500 square-foot commercial/restaurant building in place of the former Pizza Hut. Presently, there is an abandoned monument sign from the former tenant. The new monument sign will replace the existing sign to service the new proposed tenants, T-Mobile and Schools First Federal Credit Union. The sign features a modern design with a rectangular body and minimal massing. The sign is six (6) feet tall (to the top of the decorative aluminum column), 9 feet, 3 inches long, 1 foot, 8 inches wide and setback 16 feet, 10 inches from the face of curb. At this location, the sign does not obstruct visibility or create any line-of-site issues since all traffic is northbound and entrance into the site is protected by a traffic signal. The design of the sign is shown below: Figure 1 – Proposed Monument Sign Page 10 of 66 SARC23-0003 72310 Hwy 111 Monument Sign Page 3 of 5 April 11, 2023 The sign framing, base, and decorative column are constructed from aluminum with two (2) 1 ½ inch deep aluminum tenant panels. The tenant panels are rout-out backlit so that only the business name is illuminated at night. The monument sign features a masonry base and decorative parasoleil metal panels. The frame and cap are painted complimentary shades of beige. The monument sign will be placed in a landscaped area with drought tolerant shrubs and decomposed granite. The materials will match the approved building architecture, shown below for reference: Figure 2 – PP/CUP20-0002 – Approved Building Elevation (Reference Only): ZONING ORDINANCE SUMMARY Pursuant to PDMC Section 25.68.050, all new freestanding monument signs require Architectural Review Commission (ARC) review and approval. The standards for monument signs are listed under Section 25.56.070 (D) and Section 25.56.080 (B)(2) of the Sign Ordinance. Compliance with the PDMC is summarized below: Table 2 – Monument Sign Conformance Determination Standard Ordinance Project Conformance Determination Sign Area 50 square feet 20 square feet Yes Sign Height 6 feet 6 feet Yes Number per Frontage 1 1 Yes Illumination Internal or external Internal Yes Additionally, all monument signs are required to be placed in a permanently landscaped area not less than 24 square feet. The proposed sign will be in a perimeter landscape area greater than 24 square feet with future drought tolerant shrubs. The messaging on the sign is limited to the tenant names and five-digit address number; no phone numbers are included. Page 11 of 66 SARC23-0003 72310 Hwy 111 Monument Sign Page 4 of 5 April 11, 2023 Per PDMC 25.56.030 (E), when approving or rejecting a sign permit application, the ARC shall consider the design review criteria provided below and shall make the following findings: 1. That the sign is necessary for the applicant’s enjoyment of substantial trade and property rights. The sign is necessary to provide adequate identification to customers and employees of the businesses in the building as it is located on a high-volume vehicular arterial (Fred Waring Drive). The existing monument sign at the intersection of Highway 111 and Desert Crossings only services the Walmart Neighborhood Market. 2. That the sign is consistent with the intent and purpose of this chapter and title. The sign is consistent with the intent and purpose of the Sign Ordinance as the sign is designed in harmony with the proposed new building and complies with all applicable development standards. The material and color of the monument sign match those used in the architecture of the proposed building in Case No. PP20- 0002. 3. That the sign does not constitute a detriment to public health, safety, and welfare. The design of the sign does not constitute a detriment to public health, safety, and welfare as the design of the sign does not incorporate elements that are distracting or intrusive to motorists or pedestrians. The placement of the sign is not anticipated to create sight obstruction to motorists or pedestrians as it is setback away from line of site areas, adjacent streets, and drive aisles. The proposed monument sign is setback 16 feet, 10 inches from the face of the street curb. 4. That the size, shape, color, height, and placement of the sign is compatible with and will have a harmonious relationship to the building it identifies, the surrounding neighborhoods, and other signs in the area. The size of the sign complies with the development standards established in the City’s Sign Ordinance and is in scale with the proposed building. The location of the sign in the perimeter landscaping is typical of the other monument signs along the east side of Highway 111. The aluminum frame is painted with a desert palette that complements the plaster and decorative screen walls of the proposed building and the painted business name provides contrast against the white acrylic background. 5. That both the location of the proposed sign and the design of its visual elements (lettering, words, figures, colors, decorative motifs, spacing, and proportions) are legible under normal viewing conditions prevailing where the sign is to be located. The sign is oriented in a manner to be visible to pedestrians and motorists traveling along Highway 111. The business names on the aluminum tenant panels and address numbers on the decorative column are appropriately scaled and legible under typical viewing conditions. Additionally, panels are rout-out backlit to allow for visibility in non-daylight hours. Page 12 of 66 SARC23-0003 72310 Hwy 111 Monument Sign Page 5 of 5 April 11, 2023 6. That the location, height, and design of the proposed sign does not obscure from view or unduly detract from existing or adjacent signs and does not in any way compromise the health or safety of any person(s). The location, height, and design of the proposed sign does not obscure view or unduly detract from existing signs in the vicinity and does not adversely affect the public health, safety or welfare. The height of the sign conforms to the Ordinance and is setback 16 feet, 10 inches from the face of the curb to ensure relative consistency among business frontages along Highway 111. 7. That the location and design of the proposed sign, and its size, shape, illumination, and color are compatible with the visual characteristics of the surrounding area so as not to detract from or cause depreciation of the value of adjacent developed properties. The height and size of the sign comply with the requirements found in Table 25.56- 2 of the Sign Ordinance. The Applicant is proposing a desert tone palette that will match the exact materials seen on the proposed building facade. 8. That the location and design of a proposed sign in close proximity to a residential district does not adversely affect the value or character of the adjacent residential uses. The sign is compatible with the design of the building and meets the requirements established in Table 25.56-2 for commercial signage, so it will not adversely impact the character of adjacent commercial and residential uses. The proposed sign is not located within the immediate vicinity of any residential neighborhoods. Additionally, the sign is located on the east side of Highway 111, a predominantly commercial and retail arterial. The sign does not directly face existing residential uses. 9. That any neon tubing used in conjunction with any sign is incorporated as an integral part of the sign design with careful attention to color, intensity of light, and the use of colors that are not overly bright. Neon tubing is not proposed as part of the monument sign. The sign will be internally illuminated by backlit, rout out light emitting diodes (LED) in a manner that complies with the Sign Ordinance requirements for cabinet signs. 10. That the quantity of information displayed in the sign does not cause visual clutter. The signage text is limited to the name of the respective tenants and the property address number. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the ARC determines that the requirements of the findings have been met based on the analysis and approve the Design Review as proposed. Attachment: 1. Project Exhibits Page 13 of 66 Page 14 of 66 Page 15 of 66 Page 16 of 66 Page 17 of 66 Page 18 of 66 Page 19 of 66 CITY OF PALM DESERT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MEMORANDUM To: Honorable Chair and Members of the Commission From: Anna Dan, Assistant Planner Date: April 11, 2023 Case No(s): SARC23-0002 Subject: Consideration to approve a Signage Design Review for the addition of one (1) new awning and replacement of two (2) new awnings and signage for an existing Ulta beauty store located at 72369 Highway 111, Suite 100. BACKGROUND The Applicant, Jeanine Wilson, is requesting approval for one (1) new fabric awning sign, and replacement of two exiting awnings for Ulta, a retail beauty store, on a multitenant tenant building pad located at 72369 Highway 111, Suite 100. The building is located at the southwest corner of Highway 111 and Fred Waring Drive within the Desert Crossings Shopping Center. The Ulta storefront currently features two (2) orange fabric awnings with the words “Ulta Beauty” printed on the valance (Awnings B). The project will install one (1) new awning (Awning A) above the center entryway, projecting from the front of the arcade and replace the two existing awnings (Awnings B) to match. The Desert Crossings Sign Program regulates signage within the Desert Crossings Shopping Center. However, the sign program does not provide guidelines for awnings; therefore, all awnings are subject to the requirements of the Palm Desert Municipal Code (PDMC). PROJECT SUMMARY A. Property Description: The project site is an existing Ulta beauty store located within the Desert Crossing Shopping Center. The site is comprised of one parcel totaling 2.84-acres containing one (1) commercial building pad with a floor area of approximately 45,000 square feet. The Ulta shares the building pad with the adjacent tenant, Best Buy. The site is zoned Regional Commercial Center (P.C.-3) and was approved as part of the Desert Crossings entitlement in 1992 per Case No. PP 92-05 by adopted City Council Resolution No. 92-84. The Ulta exterior façade was originally approved by the Architectural Review Commission (ARC) in 2011 per Case No. MISC11-178 which included the existing Awnings B. Page 20 of 66 SARC23-0002 Ulta Awning Page 2 of 4 April 11, 2023 B. Zoning, General Plan and Adjacent Uses: Table 1 – Adjacent Land Use and Designations Existing Uses General Plan Zoning Project Site Desert Crossings Shopping Center Regional Retail Regional Commercial Center (P.C.-3) North Desert Crossings Shopping Center Regional Retail Regional Commercial Center (P.C.-3) South Desert Crossings Shopping Center Regional Retail Regional Commercial Center (P.C.-3) East Desert Crossings Shopping Center Regional Retail Regional Commercial Center (P.C.-3) West Hiking Trails Open Space Open Space (O.S.) C. Project Description The project is a request to install one new awning sign (Awning A) on the main entry facade and replace the two existing awnings (Awnings B) to match. All three awnings will feature a valance and open sides. The awnings will be constructed of steel tube framing and "500 Patio" fabric covers in the color "Orange Pop." Awning A will measure 25 feet, 11 inches long, 4 feet, 0 inches tall, and project 3 feet, 0 inches from the entry façade. The valance will measure 8 inches wide with 4-inch-tall white vinyl letters. Awnings B will match the dimensions previously approved under Case No. MISC11-178, the only modifications will be the fabric, framing type, and color. Awnings B will also have an 8-inch-wide valance with 4-inch-tall white vinyl lettering. ZONING ORDINANCE SUMMARY Pursuant to PDMC Section 25.68.050, all new awnings require Architectural Review Commission (ARC) review and approval. The standards for awnings signs are listed under Section 25.56.070 (D) and Section 25.56.080 (E) of the Sign Ordinance. Compliance with the PDMC is summarized below: Table 2 – Awning Sign Conformance Determination Standard Ordinance Project Conformance Determination Number of Signs 1 sign per awning 1 sign per awning (total 3) Yes Sign Area Maximum letter height 1/3 of awning height ½ of awning height Yes Sign Location Awning or Valance Awning Yes Page 21 of 66 SARC23-0002 Ulta Awning Page 3 of 4 April 11, 2023 Per PDMC 25.56.030 (E), when approving or rejecting a sign permit application, the ARC shall consider the design review criteria provided below and shall make the following findings: 1. That the sign is necessary for the applicant’s enjoyment of substantial trade and property rights. The awnings provide passive shade over the pedestrian entry and walkways that connect the Desert Crossings Shopping Center. The signage on the valance is more decorative than it is functional as the main business identification sign is an existing wall sign located directly above the proposed Awning A. 2. That the sign is consistent with the intent and purpose of this chapter and title. The signs are consistent with the intent and purpose of the Sign Ordinance as the signage is well designed with respect to scale, color, and material. The sign also complies with other applicable zoning requirements pursuant to PDMC 25.56 which prohibits illuminated awnings and alternative messaging such as business phone numbers. 3. That the sign does not constitute a detriment to public health, safety, and welfare. The design and placement of the awnings do not constitute a detriment to public health, safety, and welfare as the awnings do not incorporate elements that are distracting or intrusive to motorists or pedestrians. Two of the awnings are already existing and the placement of Awning A is not anticipated to create sight obstructions as it is setback away from line of site areas and drive aisles. 4. That the size, shape, color, height, and placement of the sign is compatible with and will have a harmonious relationship to the building it identifies, the surrounding neighborhoods, and other signs in the area. The proposed Awning A measures 25 feet, 11 inches wide and projects 3 feet from the entry façade. Awning A fits within the recessed features of the arcade, similar to Awnings B. The height of all three awnings provides at least a minimum 8-foot clearance and the color, a deep orange, is compatible with the Desert Crossing Shopping Center. Several of the businesses within the shopping center have awnings which vary in color, lining the storefront, including the entryways and windows. Therefore, the new awnings and signage would be harmonious with the architecture of the building and the center. 5. That both the location of the proposed sign and the design of its visual elements (lettering, words, figures, colors, decorative motifs, spacing, and proportions) are legible under normal viewing conditions prevailing where the sign is to be located. The awning features four-inch-tall vinyl letters centered on an 8-inch-wide valance. The signage is decorative and secondary to the main building identification sign, but still proportional to the size of the awning. The awnings are legible at a street-level for pedestrians and not catered toward motorists. Page 22 of 66 SARC23-0002 Ulta Awning Page 4 of 4 April 11, 2023 6. That the location, height, and design of the proposed sign does not obscure from view or unduly detract from existing or adjacent signs and does not in any way compromise the health or safety of any person(s). The proposed awning color and hue is compatible with the existing building and overall Desert Crossing Shopping Center, as demonstrated by the existing Awnings B. The location, height, and design of the proposed sign does not obscure view or unduly detract from existing signs in the vicinity and does not adversely affect the public health, safety, or welfare. Tenant visibility is prominent through the use of wall signs and monument signs which are regulated through a master sign program. 7. That the location and design of the proposed sign, and its size, shape, illumination, and color are compatible with the visual characteristics of the surrounding area so as not to detract from or cause depreciation of the value of adjacent developed properties. The height and size of the awning’s signs comply with the requirements found in PDMC Table 25.56-2 of the Sign Ordinance. The proposed size and shape of the awnings are compatible with the visual characteristics of the existing Awnings B, and no structural modifications are proposed for Awning A. The awnings will not be illuminated and the proposed color is compatible with the palette of the building. 8. That the location and design of a proposed sign in close proximity to a residential district does not adversely affect the value or character of the adjacent residential uses. The sign is compatible with the design of the building and meets the requirements established in Table 25.56-2 for commercial signage, so it will not adversely impact the character of adjacent commercial and residential uses. Additionally, the building is setback several hundred feet from Fred Waring Drive and Highway 111 and does not adversely affect nearby residential uses. 9. That any neon tubing used in conjunction with any sign is incorporated as an integral part of the sign design with careful attention to color, intensity of light, and the use of colors that are not overly bright. Neon tubing or other illuminating features are not proposed as part of the awning sign. 10. That the quantity of information displayed in the sign does not cause visual clutter. The signage text is limited to the name of the business in a size font that is proportional to the valance. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the ARC determines that the requirements of the findings have been met based on the analysis and approves the Design Review as presented. Attachment: 1. Project Exhibits Page 23 of 66 Page 24 of 66 Page 25 of 66 Page 26 of 66 Page 27 of 66 Page 28 of 66 Page 29 of 66 Page 30 of 66 CITY OF PALM DESERT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MEMORANDUM To: Honorable Chair and Members of the Commission From: Audrey Nickerson, Associate Planner II Date: April 11, 2023 Case No. MISC22-0020 Subject: Consideration to approve a design review of a private sport court on a residential property at 45710 Verba Santa Drive. PROJECT SUMMARY The applicant, Rick Leventhal, is requesting design review approval for a private sport court located in the rear yard of a single-family residence located at 45710 Verba Santa Drive. The sport court will be used for pickleball and is 20’-0” wide by 44’-0” long. No lighting is proposed for the court area. The court area includes landscape screening adjoining the neighboring properties with 15-gallon Ficus trees. Sport courts are subject to review and approval by the Architectural Review Commission (ARC) pursuant to Palm Desert Municipal Code (PDMC) Section 25.40.070. BACKGROUND In early 2022, the sport court was constructed without City approval and remains the subject of an open Code Compliance case. A decision by the ARC is required to resolve the code compliance case and make a final determination of the use. On March 22, 2023, staff mailed a courtesy notice of the ARC meeting to property owners within 300 feet of the project site. On October 11, 2022, planning staff presented the project to the ARC for design review. The ARC continued the item with a 6-0 vote providing the following comments: 1) Applicant must conduct sound analysis to record actual noise decibels to determine if the sports court is within the Palm Desert Municipal Code (PDMC) allowable noise requirements; and, 2) Staff to provide Commissioners further clarification of PDMC Noise Requirements, specifically on the “average” decibel of noise. On March 13, 2023, the Applicant submitted a Noise Impact Assessment to the City. On March 28, 2023, Planning staff requested continuance of the case because the Noise Impact Assessment was still under review by the City’s third-party consultant. The ARC voted to continue the item to the next regularly scheduled ARC meeting on April 11, 2023, with a 6-0 vote. The City’s third-party consultant submitted comments to the City on April 3, 2023, and Planning staff shared them with the Applicant via email. Among other minor revisions, the City requested Page 31 of 66 MISC 22-0020 – Levanthal Residence Page 2 of 2 April 11, 2023 that the acoustical engineer conduct additional ambient noise measurements to confirm the findings of the study. The Applicant requested more time to update the Noise Impact Study to address the City's comments. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends the ARC continue the design review of the subject sports court and allow the Applicant up to 30 days to return to ARC for design review with the revised Noise Impact Assessment. Page 32 of 66 CITY OF PALM DESERT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MEMORANDUM To: Honorable Chair and Members of the Commission From: Anna Dan, Assistant Planner Date: April 11, 2023 Case No(s): MISC23-0011 Subject: Consideration to deny a Design Review for a façade modification to an existing Chuck E. Cheese restaurant and family entertainment center located at 72513 Highway 111, Suite B. BACKGROUND The Applicant, Lillia Sanchell, on behalf of Parkway Construction, is requesting approval of a design review for an exterior façade modification to an existing Chuck E. Cheese restaurant located at 72513 Highway 111, within the Desert Crossings Shopping Center. The proposed exterior façade modifications include exterior paint color changes to the front façade and new cantilevered aluminum window awnings aligned with Chuck E. Cheese Entertainment, LLC.’s new storefront branding. No structural modifications are proposed to the existing building. The new exterior wall signage is shown on the plan set and is subject to the discretion of the Architectural Review Commission (ARC) with respect to allowable sign area. Signage is also regulated by the Desert Crossings Sign Program and the conditions of Case No. Commercial Design Review (C) 98-13 and Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 98-14. Staff finds that the project is inconsistent with the design of the center and the Palm Desert Municipal Code (PDMC); therefore, recommending denial. PROJECT SUMMARY A. Property Description: The project site is an existing 12,106 square-foot Chuck E. Cheese restaurant and family entertainment center located at 72513 Highway 111, Suite B. The suite is within a single- story, multitenant commercial building consisting of three total spaces tenant. The exterior of the existing building is painted a light tan color to match other spaces within the center. The Chuck E Cheese building was constructed in 1992 as part of the Desert Crossings Center and the restaurant/entertainment use was approved in 1998 per Case No. CUP 98-14 by adopted Planning Commission Resolution No. 1893.The ARC approved the Page 33 of 66 MISC23-0011 Chuck E. Cheese Page 2 of 5 April 11, 2023 original façade and architectural elevations of the Chuck E Cheese building in 1998. That approval consisted of a tower element on the front elevation, a 56 square-foot illuminated mouse logo, and 24-inch copy reverse channel lit letters. B. Zoning, General Plan and Adjacent Uses: Table 1 – Adjacent Land Use and Designations Existing Uses General Plan Zoning Project Site Chuck E. Cheese Restaurant and Entertainment Regional Retail Regional Commercial Center (P.C.-3) North Retail-commercial Regional Retail Regional Commercial Center, Scenic Preservation (P.C.-3, S.P) South Palm Valley Storm Channel Open Space Open Space (O.S.) East Palm Valley Storm Channel Open Space Open Space (O.S.) West Desert Crossing Shopping Center Regional Retail Regional Commercial Center (P.C.-3) C. Project Description The Applicant is requesting approval of a design review for a façade modification to an existing Chuck E. Cheese restaurant and entertainment center. All modifications are limited to the exterior of the building and no structural alterations are proposed. The improvements will be on the northwest and southeast elevations and both frontages are visible from Highway 111. Northwest (Front) Elevation: The proposed exterior changes include painting the existing stucco, tan, green, and gray and adding aluminum cantilevered eyebrows painted red. Additionally, the window frames and upper parapet trim will be painted gray and the entry door will have a dark bronze finish. The "cheese pattern" on the upper facade of the northwest elevation is achieved using paint, alternating between the tan and cream colors, with cream circles to mimic cheese holes. The center, painted a solid green, breaks up this cheese pattern. Given the existing architecture, there is no break in the building plane where there are paint color changes. The new aluminum cantilevered awnings are proposed to replace the fabric awnings; all backlights which were under the original canvas awnings will be removed. The eyebrows measure 8 inches tall and project 1 foot, 6 inches from the architectural reveal. At this length, the eyebrows would not project past the columns. Page 34 of 66 MISC23-0011 Chuck E. Cheese Page 3 of 5 April 11, 2023 Southeast Elevation: The applicant will repaint this elevation to match the existing colors. The colors consist of cream for the primary facade and beige on the wainscotting and parapet trim. Signage: Signage will be reviewed by staff under a separate permit application subject to the requirements of the Desert Crossings Sign Program which regulates location, area, and allowable construction. Signage is proposed on the front and rear building elevations. All signage will be required to comply with the area maximums allowed by the sign program and be constructed as reverse channel lit signs. ANALYSIS Development Standards The project is subject to the development standards set forth by the Palm Desert Municipal Code for the Planned Commercial (P.C.-3) zoning district, as well as the Desert Crossings Sign Program. The project does not propose any changes to the site plan, landscape plan, or existing parking facilities. All modifications are limited to the exterior façade and no structural alterations to the site are required to facilitate those changes. ZONING ORDINANCE SUMMARY Alterations to retail and commercial facades are subject to the review and approval of a design review by the Architectural Review Commission pursuant to PDMC Section 25.68.020 (A)(1) and (A)(2). Findings for the ARC decisions of design review applications are listed under PDMC Section 25.68.040 as follows. Findings in support of the project are listed below: A. That the proposed development conforms to any legally adopted development standards. The proposed project is located within an existing approved building space and will not make additions or substantial modifications to the site. The project will only make cosmetic updates to the exterior of the existing building consisting of paint color changes, aluminum eyebrows, and signage. The building was entitled as part of the Desert Crossings precise plan and the restaurant/entertainment use was approved under Case No. CUP 98-13 by adopted Planning Commission resolution No. 1893. The project will not alter the building's square footage or use; therefore, it is deemed conforming. B. That the design and location of the proposed development and its relationship to neighboring existing or proposed developments and traffic is such that it will not impair the desirability of investment or occupation in the neighborhood; and that it Page 35 of 66 MISC23-0011 Chuck E. Cheese Page 4 of 5 April 11, 2023 will not unreasonably interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or proposed developments and that it will not create traffic hazards or congestion. The Chuck E. Cheese restaurant and entertainment center is located within the Desert Crossings shopping center. The architectural character of the shopping center is characterized by a blend of southwestern and Moroccan style and a color palette including tan, brown, cream, beige, orange, and light pink. The proposed colors are not found elsewhere in the existing center. The change will not create traffic hazards or congestion as it consists of cosmetic updates to an existing center. C. That the design and location of the proposed development is in keeping with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and is not detrimental to the harmonious, orderly, and attractive development contemplated by this title and the General Plan of the City. The Chuck E. Cheese restaurant and entertainment center is located within the Desert Crossings shopping center and is subject to the development standards of the PDMC and the Desert Crossings Sign Program. The shopping center is characterized by a blend of southwestern and Moroccan-style architecture with a color palette of cream, beige, brown, orange, and pink tones. The proposed exterior modifications are entirely aesthetic and, given the site's location, unsuited for the shopping center. The surrounding building facades are notably one color with some accents and have distinct architectural features and projections. Alternatively, the proposed design utilizes paint to achieve a dimensioned look along a singular plane, as demonstrated by the "cheese pattern" on the ends of the facade. The center portion, painted a warm green, disrupts the cheese pattern with a prompt change in color. Overall, the design is not harmonious with the existing center and tenants. D. That the design and location of the proposed development would provide a desirable environment for its occupants, as well as for its neighbors, and that it is aesthetically of good composition, materials, textures, and colors. The proposed design utilizes different paint colors to achieve the desired dimensions and patterns. These paints are of good quality and will retain the same finish as the existing facade. However, aesthetically, the design is not compatible with adjacent tenants or within the context of the center. The proposed color palette and “cheese pattern” are not adaptable. Neighboring storefronts are uniform in their design and mainly utilize signage to differentiate themselves. E. That the proposed use conforms to all the requirements of the zone in which it is located and all other applicable requirements. The proposed project conforms with legally adopted development standards of the PDMC for the Regional Planned Commercial zoning district, including the restaurant/entertainment land use and built form. Page 36 of 66 MISC23-0011 Chuck E. Cheese Page 5 of 5 April 11, 2023 F. That the overall development of the land shall be designed to ensure the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. All the modifications proposed in this project are limited to the exterior building façade. These modifications do not alter the land use, accessibility, or facilities on site. The project also preserves the existing pedestrian walkways and connections and does not further obscure the views of other buildings in the center. Therefore, the project does not present any adverse impacts to the protection of public health, safety, and general welfare. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the ARC deny the request for Design Review approval, determining the requirements of the findings have not been met. Should the ARC vote to approve the design review, any modifications required by the ARC should be added to the motion as a condition of approval. The ARC may also vote to continue the case subject to revisions and clear direction for the requested changes. Attachment: 1. Project Exhibits from the Applicant 2. Letter from Applicant regarding Brand Standards dated April 3, 2023 Page 37 of 66 This is a reimage of an existing tenant space currently operating as a Chuck E Cheese (CEC) store. Exterior scope includes painting building, replacing lighting, no structural modifications. Interior scope includes painting, replacing seating, tables, games, wall finishes, minimal lighting, restroom fixtures. Excluded from the project is new signage, permitted and installed by a separate scope. PROJECT SCOPE Occupancy Class: A-2 (Restaurant) Building Area: 12,106 SF Use: CODE SUMMARY Occupants: Exit: 514 Occupants Required: 514 occupants x 0.15 = 77" Total Provided: 72" + 48" + 48" + 36" = 204" Total Restaurant Electrical: Electrical Code 2022 of California Title 24, Part 3 Plumbing: California Plumbing Code 2022 Title 24, Part 5 Fire: California Fire Code 2022 Title 24, Part 9 Mechanical:California Mechanical Code 2022 Title 24, Part 4 Energy: California Energy Code 2022 Title 24, Part 6 Building:California Building Code 2022 Title 24, Part 2 Volume 1 & 2 Automatic Sprinkler System: Yes Construction Type: II-B California Existing Building Code 2022 Title 24, Part 10 PROJ. NO: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: MEP Engineer: Architect: Owner:1000 Civic Circle Lewisville, TX 75067pkwycon.com (972) 221-1979Parkway C&A, LPCONSTRUCTION ARCHITECTURE Parkway C&A, LP © 2022 CS1.0 Cover Sheet Courtney Hunter Manny Ogunlola 04-21996 72513 CA-111 B, Palm Desert, CA 93360 Parkway C&A, LP 1000 Civic Circle Lewisville, TX 75287 Ph: 972-221-1979 Contact: Michael Orr CEC ENTERTAINMENT, INC. 1707 Market Place Blvd. Suite 200 Irving, TX 75063 Ph: 972-258-5521 Contact: Justin Lee Dialectic Engineering 310 W 20th Street 200 Kansas City, MO 64108 Ph: (816)997.9627 Contact: Joe Hillebrenner, P.E. #353 Location Map Vicinity Map 72513 CA-111 B, Palm Desert, CA 93360 Project Site No. Description Date A Permit Set 2023.02.01 1 City Comments 2023.02.23 2 City Comments 2023.03.09 Index of Drawings Sheet Number Sheet Name Current Revision Current Revision Date General CS1.0 Cover Sheet 2 2023.03.09 CS7.0 Site Plan 1 2023.02.23 Demolition D1.0 Demolition Floor Plan A 2023.02.01 D1.1 Demolition RCP A 2023.02.01 D1.2 Demolition Elevations 1 2023.02.23 Architectural A1.2 Dimension Outlet Plan A 2023.02.01 A3.0 Reflected Ceiling Plan 1 2023.02.23 A4.0 Exterior Elevations 1 2023.02.23 Project Site Page 38 of 66 Legend - Site Plan Adjacent Tenants Accessibility Route Chuck E. Cheese Space ADA Parking Symbol Existing Trash Enclousure ADA ramps 1 5 1 5 1 5 2 3 6 6 Existing Trash Enclousure Approx. 16'-0" Sidewalk4 4 4 Chuck E. Cheese Space 12,106 SQ. FT. Adjacent Tenants Adjacent Tenants A d ja c e n t T e n a n ts A d ja c e n t T e n a n ts A d ja c e n t T e n a n ts Approx. 9'-0" SidewalkA p p ro x . 6 '-0 " S id e w a lk PROJ. NO: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: MEP Engineer: Architect: Owner:1000 Civic Circle Lewisville, TX 75067pkwycon.com (972) 221-1979Parkway C&A, LPCONSTRUCTION ARCHITECTURE Parkway C&A, LP © 2022 CS7.0 Site Plan Courtney Hunter Manny Ogunlola 04-21996 72513 CA-111 B, Palm Desert, CA 93360 Parkway C&A, LP 1000 Civic Circle Lewisville, TX 75287 Ph: 972-221-1979 Contact: Michael Orr CEC ENTERTAINMENT, INC. 1707 Market Place Blvd. Suite 200 Irving, TX 75063 Ph: 972-258-5521 Contact: Justin Lee Dialectic Engineering 310 W 20th Street 200 Kansas City, MO 64108 Ph: (816)997.9627 Contact: Joe Hillebrenner, P.E. #353 Scope Notes - Site Plan 1 Existing parking to remain. 2 Main entry. 3 Existing sidewalk. 4 Existing handicap parking. 5 Existing landscape to remain. 6 Existing light pole to remain No. Description Date A Permit Set 2023.02.01 1 City Comments 2023.02.23 1" = 40'-0"2 Site Plan (For Reference Only) Page 39 of 66 Legend - Demo Plan Not In Contract Scope of Work Construction to be removed Scope Note Door to be removed NIC Existing wall to remain 'E' Existing 'D'Demolish 'R' Relocate 'N'New Floor outlet Wall outlet 00/1D1.2/2D1.25 6 4 10 7 9 1 2 3 11 8 12 13 14 16 17 9 1 2 3 12 10 NIC NIC NIC NIC NIC 9'-10"1 1/2"1'-1"24'-0"8'-2 1/2" 5'-0" 4 4 Adjacent Tenant Adjacent Tenant Salad BarMerch OrderBeverage Adjacent Tenant Adjacent Tenant 5 PROJ. NO: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: MEP Engineer: Architect: Owner:1000 Civic Circle Lewisville, TX 75067pkwycon.com (972) 221-1979Parkway C&A, LPCONSTRUCTION ARCHITECTURE Parkway C&A, LP © 2022 D1.0 Demolition Floor Plan Courtney Hunter Manny Ogunlola 04-21996 72513 CA-111 B, Palm Desert, CA 93360 Parkway C&A, LP 1000 Civic Circle Lewisville, TX 75287 Ph: 972-221-1979 Contact: Michael Orr CEC ENTERTAINMENT, INC. 1707 Market Place Blvd. Suite 200 Irving, TX 75063 Ph: 972-258-5521 Contact: Justin Lee Dialectic Engineering 310 W 20th Street 200 Kansas City, MO 64108 Ph: (816)997.9627 Contact: Joe Hillebrenner, P.E. #353 1/8" = 1'-0"1 Demolition Floor Plan Scope Notes Demolition Floor Plan 1 Remove (40 +/-) floor outlets throughout Kiddie and Games rooms. 2 Remove existing furniture. 3 Remove existing carpet. Include Aux and storage rooms. 4 Remove marlite in vestibule, kid check and restroom vestibule. 5 Remove floor tile as indicated. 6 Demolish studio C. 7 Remove and protect digital menu board for tile installation. 8 Millwork: remove red laminate at order, salad, merch and beverage. 9 Remove existing decor. 10 Restroom: remove floor tile, wall tile, toilets, urinals, vanities, partitions, accessories, 2x4 lights, light box, etc. Demo wall finish to framing. Remove door if applicable. 11 Remove stanchions at kid check. 12 Relocate track lights as needed to illuminate wall decor. 13 Remove portion of wall. 14 Demolish doors at entry and vestibule. 15 Not used. 16 6" wide trench line to 13"x13" rough opening in slab for new recessed dance floor. 17 Remove existing light box. Power to remain. General Notes - Demolition Key #Demolition Notes A Existing conditions are based on field observations. The demolition plan is for reference only. Contractor to verify existing conditions prior to the start of work. B Demolish indicated structures and fixtures in an orderly and careful manner. C Provide temporary supports, shoring and bracing as required to protect existing structural items remaining in place. Verify and coordinate existing utilites to be removed and/or relocated. D Erect weatherproof closures for exterior openings created by demolition work. E Demolished items shall be removed from site and legally disposed of. F Protect existing landscape materials, appurtenances, and structures which are to remain. G Remove all floor finishes down to substrate. H Remove walls and structures down to surface which may be refinished. J Where the scope of work requires penetration of the existing slab, the GC shall verify existing slab's construction type. GC to notify owner if a structural supported slab is found. Do not cut any portion of the slab's structural reinforcing. If trench exceeds 8" width, install reinforcing #5 x 18" dowels with 9" embedment @ 18" O.C.. The GC & sub-contractors shall maintain the integrity of the existing slab by patching and repairing as needed. K Disconnect, remove and cap designated MEP utilities and fixtures within demolition areas. Mark location of disconnected utilities. L Remove abandoned electric wiring to source of supply. Verify that abandoned wiring and equipment serves only abandoned facilities. Coordinate utility service outages with utility company. Cut conduit flush with or beneath walls and floors, and refinish surfaces. M When encountered, inform owner of presence of contaminated materials. Contaminated materials are to be removed by others. Verify that previously removed materials are acceptable prior to commencement of demolition work. N Remove all existing lite boxes. O Remove existing ground airlines in walkways. All ground airlines in a row of games to remain. No. Description Date A Permit Set 2023.02.01 Page 40 of 66 1 2 6 NIC NIC NIC NIC NIC Adjacent Tenant Adjacent Tenant 1 4 1 Legend - Reflected Ceiling Plan 24" x 48" Troffer Wall mount Television LT-1 9'-0" Ceiling Finish Code Ceiling Height (A.F.F.) Ceiling Tag Exit Sign Recessed Can Light Pendant -6'-0" AFF Return Diffuser (Ref. Mechanical) Supply Diffuser (Ref. Mechanical) Access Panel Exterior Wall Sconce 48" Industrial Fluorescent Strip Gypsum ceiling Existing Acoustical lay-in ceiling LT-1 EXIT Vanity Light -7'-0" AFF Existing Acoustical lay-in ceiling LT-2 Legend - Demo Plan Not In Contract Scope of Work Construction to be removed Scope Note Door to be removed NIC Existing wall to remain 'E' Existing 'D'Demolish 'R' Relocate 'N'New Floor outlet Wall outlet 00 PROJ. NO: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: MEP Engineer: Architect: Owner:1000 Civic Circle Lewisville, TX 75067pkwycon.com (972) 221-1979Parkway C&A, LPCONSTRUCTION ARCHITECTURE Parkway C&A, LP © 2022 D1.1 Demolition RCP Courtney Hunter Manny Ogunlola 04-21996 72513 CA-111 B, Palm Desert, CA 93360 Parkway C&A, LP 1000 Civic Circle Lewisville, TX 75287 Ph: 972-221-1979 Contact: Michael Orr CEC ENTERTAINMENT, INC. 1707 Market Place Blvd. Suite 200 Irving, TX 75063 Ph: 972-258-5521 Contact: Justin Lee Dialectic Engineering 310 W 20th Street 200 Kansas City, MO 64108 Ph: (816)997.9627 Contact: Joe Hillebrenner, P.E. #353 1/8" = 1'-0"1 Demo Reflected Ceiling Plan Scope Notes Demolition RCP 1 Remove 2x4 lights. 2 Remove stage lights. 3 Not used. 4 Remove dark ceiling tile at stage. 5 Not used. 6 Relocate track lights as needed to illuminate wall decor. No. Description Date A Permit Set 2023.02.01 Page 41 of 66 Legend - Demo Plan Not In Contract Scope of Work Construction to be removed Scope Note Door to be removed NIC Existing wall to remain 'E' Existing 'D'Demolish 'R' Relocate 'N'New Floor outlet Wall outlet 00 1 3 5 3 3 6 ADJACENT TENANTADJACENT TENANT1 5 ADJACENT TENANTADJACENT TENANTPROJ. NO: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: MEP Engineer: Architect: Owner:1000 Civic Circle Lewisville, TX 75067pkwycon.com (972) 221-1979Parkway C&A, LPCONSTRUCTION ARCHITECTURE Parkway C&A, LP © 2022 D1.2 Demolition Elevations Courtney Hunter Manny Ogunlola 04-21996 72513 CA-111 B, Palm Desert, CA 93360 Parkway C&A, LP 1000 Civic Circle Lewisville, TX 75287 Ph: 972-221-1979 Contact: Michael Orr CEC ENTERTAINMENT, INC. 1707 Market Place Blvd. Suite 200 Irving, TX 75063 Ph: 972-258-5521 Contact: Justin Lee Dialectic Engineering 310 W 20th Street 200 Kansas City, MO 64108 Ph: (816)997.9627 Contact: Joe Hillebrenner, P.E. #353 Scope Notes Demolition Elevation 1 Remove signage. 2 Not used. 3 Remove awning. 4 Not used. 5 Remove LED accents at parapet. 6 Remove storefront door. 3/16" = 1'-0"1 North West Demo Elevations General Notes - Demolition Key #Demolition Notes A Existing conditions are based on field observations. The demolition plan is for reference only. Contractor to verify existing conditions prior to the start of work. B Demolish indicated structures and fixtures in an orderly and careful manner. C Provide temporary supports, shoring and bracing as required to protect existing structural items remaining in place. Verify and coordinate existing utilites to be removed and/or relocated. D Erect weatherproof closures for exterior openings created by demolition work. E Demolished items shall be removed from site and legally disposed of. F Protect existing landscape materials, appurtenances, and structures which are to remain. G Remove all floor finishes down to substrate. H Remove walls and structures down to surface which may be refinished. J Where the scope of work requires penetration of the existing slab, the GC shall verify existing slab's construction type. GC to notify owner if a structural supported slab is found. Do not cut any portion of the slab's structural reinforcing. If trench exceeds 8" width, install reinforcing #5 x 18" dowels with 9" embedment @ 18" O.C.. The GC & sub-contractors shall maintain the integrity of the existing slab by patching and repairing as needed. K Disconnect, remove and cap designated MEP utilities and fixtures within demolition areas. Mark location of disconnected utilities. L Remove abandoned electric wiring to source of supply. Verify that abandoned wiring and equipment serves only abandoned facilities. Coordinate utility service outages with utility company. Cut conduit flush with or beneath walls and floors, and refinish surfaces. M When encountered, inform owner of presence of contaminated materials. Contaminated materials are to be removed by others. Verify that previously removed materials are acceptable prior to commencement of demolition work. N Remove all existing lite boxes. O Remove existing ground airlines in walkways. All ground airlines in a row of games to remain. 3/16" = 1'-0"2 South East Demo Elevations No. Description Date A Permit Set 2023.02.01 1 City Comments 2023.02.23 1 1/2" = 1'-0"3 Existing Perspective 1/2" = 1'-0"4 Existing Perspective Page 42 of 66 MOTION THEATER PHOTORIDECEC20 AMP2 MINUTE DRILLS EA W O LF HAMMER 2POP ITFOR GOLDAlley Classics (6) NBA HOOPS NBA HOOPS TERMINATORMINI TRAINHARPOON LAGOON DUCKYSPLASH20 AMPBIG WIN SIMPSON'SSOCCERBATMANBATMANCEC Photo Booth REDHOT!DEADSTORMPIRATESBIKINIBOTTOMBOWLINGSERVER20 AMPPPCSUPER BIG RIG BASEBALL PRO LUIGI'SMANSIONCRUIS'N BLASTCRUIS'N BLASTARKABOATSPONGEBOB ORDER UP POPCORNFISH BOWL FRENZY BIKERALLYBARRELOFMONKEYSALPINE RACER II S U B W A YS U R F E R S CRAZY TOWER ICE CUBE CAROUSEL HORSE DESPICABLE ME JELLY LAB SPINNER FRENZY CROSSY ROAD CATCHERDINOSAURBLACK HOLEMONOPOLYVIDEOOCTONAUTSBIG BASS W H EEL CAR TUNED MONOPOLY ROLL N GO FSKREMOVE BASEFSKREMOVE BASE1 3 11TICKET BLASTERNBA HOOP TROOPPOP THE LOCK HOP 'N STACK ZOMBIE LAND BATTLE TIGHT ROPE SNOWBALL TOSS HOOP IT UP POWER ROLL SPONGEBOB SUPER STRIKER AVENGERS PLINKO TICKETCOASTERRINGTOSS JRDOODLEJUMPTipNBloksLUMBER JACK 1 3 1120 AMP 20 AMP 20 AMP 20 AMP 20 AMP 20 AMP20 AMP5'-0"AIRLINEAMP 20/20 1'-0"CECCREAMICENIC NIC NIC NIC NIC Adjacent Tenant Adjacent Tenant N N N N N N N N N N N NNNN17'-2"6'-0"6'-0"3'-1"6'-0"6'-0"6'-0"6'-0"6'-0"6'-0"3'-3" 6'-0"6'-0"6'-0"6'-0"3'-0" N NN 10'-1"9'-4"9'-5"7'-5"6'-9"6'-9" 21'-11"7'-1"7'-8"7'-6"9'-11"14'-10"12'-0"22'-8"13'-7"25'-6"19'-11"15'-0"13'-11"19'-2"12'-10"19'-0"12'-4"17'-2"14'-3"9'-1"8'-4"11'-0"12'-9"10'-11"12'-8"1'-6" 20 AMP 20 AMP 20 AMP20 AMP 20 AMP 20 AMP 20 AMP 20 AMP 37'-7"11'-11"Dimension Outlets Plan 20 AMP dedicated power supply Duplex receptacle w/2 integral USB charging ports E Existing Item Floor outlet duplex 20amp Data Access Circuit 1Circuit 3Circuit 5 Circuit 2Circuit 4 PROJ. NO: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: MEP Engineer: Architect: Owner:1000 Civic Circle Lewisville, TX 75067pkwycon.com (972) 221-1979Parkway C&A, LPCONSTRUCTIONARCHITECTUREParkway C&A, LP © 2022 A1.2 Dimension Outlet Plan Courtney Hunter Manny Ogunlola 04-21996 72513 CA-111 B, Palm Desert, CA 93360 Parkway C&A, LP 1000 Civic Circle Lewisville, TX 75287 Ph: 972-221-1979 Contact: Michael Orr CEC ENTERTAINMENT, INC. 1707 Market Place Blvd. Suite 200 Irving, TX 75063 Ph: 972-258-5521 Contact: Justin Lee Dialectic Engineering 310 W 20th Street 200 Kansas City, MO 64108 Ph: (816)997.9627 Contact: Joe Hillebrenner, P.E. #353 1/8" = 1'-0"1 Dimension Outlet Plan General Notes - Outlets A All Repairs and Patch work after installation shall match adjacent surfaces and have no visible seams. B New Electrical items are shown in bold graphics on plan(s). C Install new floor power (core cut), phone and air outlets as determinated by games. After games install is complete, replace any exposed / broken floor outlets covers. GC to verify that all floor outlet have brass covers. D Data outlets routed through walls or power poles. Not under carpet with power. E Provide gray outlet and face plates for all wall outlets. F Install consumer outlets at booths 2'-8" AFF horizontally to centerline of outlet, if chair rail is too wide install 2" above chair rail. G Floor outlets to require tamper proof plugs. H Caulk and seal conduit coming into Video Dance Floor box NTS2Floor Box Detail No. Description Date A Permit Set 2023.02.01 Page 43 of 66 Legend - Reflected Ceiling Plan 24" x 48" Troffer Wall mount Television LT-1 9'-0" Ceiling Finish Code Ceiling Height (A.F.F.) Ceiling Tag Exit Sign Recessed Can Light Pendant -6'-0" AFF Return Diffuser (Ref. Mechanical) Supply Diffuser (Ref. Mechanical) Access Panel Exterior Wall Sconce 48" Industrial Fluorescent Strip Gypsum ceiling Existing Acoustical lay-in ceiling LT-1 EXIT Vanity Light -7'-0" AFF Existing Acoustical lay-in ceiling LT-2 1 2 4 6 7 NIC NIC NIC NIC NIC Adjacent Tenant Adjacent Tenant Games 103 Kiddie 104 Showroom 105 Women 107 Men 106Vest 102 Entry 101 LT-1 12' - 6"3'-0"6'-0"6'-0"6'-0"6'-0"6'-0"6'-0"6'-0"6'-0"2'-0" 1 LT-1 11' - 7" LT-1 11' - 7" LT-1 12' - 6" LT-1 10' - 11" 3 3 4 Relocated 2x4 light 6 6 6 8 8 1 1'-6" P1000 unistrut channel (typ.) Double nut w/ flat washers (typ.) 12 ga wires ea. direction w/ (3) turns min. In 1 1/2" ea. end 1/2" Dia. thread unistrut hanger rods (typ.) 45 Max. (typ) 15 Typ. (Verify w/CEC) Monitor & support attachment by manuf. Provided by owner, installed by GC. typ. Ceiling Existing Joists T.O Joists Varies Existing Roof Decking 5".PROJ. NO: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: MEP Engineer: Architect: Owner:1000 Civic Circle Lewisville, TX 75067pkwycon.com (972) 221-1979Parkway C&A, LPCONSTRUCTION ARCHITECTURE Parkway C&A, LP © 2022 A3.0 Reflected Ceiling Plan Courtney Hunter Manny Ogunlola 04-21996 72513 CA-111 B, Palm Desert, CA 93360 Parkway C&A, LP 1000 Civic Circle Lewisville, TX 75287 Ph: 972-221-1979 Contact: Michael Orr CEC ENTERTAINMENT, INC. 1707 Market Place Blvd. Suite 200 Irving, TX 75063 Ph: 972-258-5521 Contact: Justin Lee Dialectic Engineering 310 W 20th Street 200 Kansas City, MO 64108 Ph: (816)997.9627 Contact: Joe Hillebrenner, P.E. #353 General Notes - RCP A All dimensions are to finish face. B Layout ceiling tile from center of room, both directions unless noted otherwise. C Sprinkler heads in suspended T-bar ceilings shall be centered in panels. D Ensure sprinkler head locations are clear of other ceiling fixtures and elements per plans E Light fixtures and HVAC diffusers shown on this drawing are for location and coordination purposes. F Coordinate all ductwork to avoid interference with ceiling support systems. G No fixtures, grilles, speakers, sprinkler heads, etc. shall touch the ceiling T's or shadow line; Center in panel. H Paint all grilles and recessed speakers to match ceiling grid. J All speaker wire shall home run to control room rack. Ref. AVI sheet for connections. K Exit Signage to be installed per building code section 1013. L Ceiling grid installation shall be per section 9.6 of ASCE 7-02 and CISCA guidelines for Seismic zones 3-4. M Refer to detail for Typical light bracing requirements. N GC to field verify all existing light and mechanical fixtures. O GC is responsible for coordination and verification of power for signage/awning prior to installation. P All non-rated partition to terminate 6" above finish ceiling. See wall types, drawings for additional information. Q Coordinate all mechanical, electrical, and fire protection systems that are supported by interface w/ceiling systems. R All insulation wiring and other construction items shall be non-combustible and rated as required by code for work in plenum spaces where indicated. S Replace damaged ceiling tiles up to 1,700sf; Paint ceiling grid to match existing as needed, typ. T Verify all exterior soffitt lights are in working order and color temperatures match. Repair/replace as needed. Paint underside of soffitt to match existing. 1/8" = 1'-0"1 Reflected Ceiling Plan NTS2Monitor Frame section A Scope Notes - RCP 1 New 2x4 troffer light. 2 Install 9 pendant lights 6'-0" AFF, center on new tables. 3 Install vanity light 7'-0" AFF. 4 Remove or relocate track lights as needed to illuminate wall art typical. 5 Not used. 6 Ceiling mounted monitor in games area. Adjust electric and data as indicated. Terminations by CEC, data runs with slack to floor +15'. CEC to verify final location. Top of monitors to be 5" below ceiling, tilt screens downward. If ceiling height is below 10'-6" or higher than 12'-6" verify with CEC. 7 Power and data in ceiling centered over dance floor. 8 New ceiling tile, match existing. No. Description Date A Permit Set 2023.02.01 1 City Comments 2023.02.23 Page 44 of 66 Area Plan Level 1 100' -0" Play Area Ceiling 112' -6" Low Roof 114' -0" TO High 123' -0"PT-E2 PT-E2 PT-02 PT-02 PT-E1 PT-E1 PT-E1 ADJACENT TENANTADJACENT TENANT1 E2 E218'-10"16'-6" Area Plan Level 1 100' -0" Play Area Ceiling 112' -6" High Roof 116' -10" TO High 123' -0" TO Arch 128' -0" Eyebrow 109' -4" 4 1 3 5 6 7 3 3 19'-6"22'-1"19'-7 1/2" 4 6 6 PT-E2PT-E1PT-E1 PT-13 ADJACENT TENANTADJACENT TENANTPT-04PT-04PT-04 6 '-0 ". 51SF Signage Area 17'-8"16'-6" 4'-6"5'-9"6'-6"4'-6"3'-0" 5'-0"6'-0"6'-7"2'-6"3'-6"5'-6"2'-6"R 1' - 6" R 3' - 0" R 2' - 0" R 4' - 0"6'-0"3'-0"5'-0"2'-6"R 1' - 6" R 2' - 6" R 2' - 0" R 4' - 0" Note: Area to be painted with 6" x 1'-0" horizontal color band scheme. Including PT-E2 and PT-E1.6"1'-0"PT-E2 PT-E1 PT-E1 PT-E1 PT-E1 PT-E2 PT-E2 PT-E2 Existing wall finish V.I.F. Continuous pressure treated ext. grade 2x8 wood blocking, paint to match eyebrow Countersink bolt heads typ. on ext. side Continuous 'Z' flashing and sealant top and bottom Continuous flashing w/ sealant (paint to match background) GC to install jbox within 25' Max Spacing, between 2x2 tube aluminum support, with sealed conduit into wall frame. See Elect. Route Conduit Above Ceiling Height Existing framing (2) 1/2" thru bolts w/flat washers @ ea. end. typ 2x8 wood blocking. Install @ ea. eyebrow vertical bracket. Coordinate bracket spacing w/manuf. General Contractor is responsible for all required blocking 2"x2" tube aluminum @ 40" O.C.8"1'-6" PROJ. NO: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: MEP Engineer: Architect: Owner:1000 Civic Circle Lewisville, TX 75067pkwycon.com (972) 221-1979Parkway C&A, LPCONSTRUCTION ARCHITECTURE Parkway C&A, LP © 2022 A4.0 Exterior Elevations Courtney Hunter Manny Ogunlola 04-21996 72513 CA-111 B, Palm Desert, CA 93360 Parkway C&A, LP 1000 Civic Circle Lewisville, TX 75287 Ph: 972-221-1979 Contact: Michael Orr CEC ENTERTAINMENT, INC. 1707 Market Place Blvd. Suite 200 Irving, TX 75063 Ph: 972-258-5521 Contact: Justin Lee Dialectic Engineering 310 W 20th Street 200 Kansas City, MO 64108 Ph: (816)997.9627 Contact: Joe Hillebrenner, P.E. #353 General Notes - Elevation A Sign company shall obtain all required signage permits prior to installation of new work and repairs. B Painted fixtures: all downspouts, scuppers, electrical panels, grilles, conduits and piping, handrails visible to public, shall be painted to match existing or adjacent material finish and banding, U.N.O. C Unpainted items: do not paint over security cameras, security/ fire alarm bells and associated pumps fixtures fittings and others life safety fixtures. Do not paint over electrical and plumbing labels. D Vegetation: All plants, trees, vegetation, garden beds and associated pathways to be protected from any physical or paint damage prior to painting. Plants to be trimmed and maintained per instructions from CEC Entertainment INC. E Fill holes and skim coat wherever signs, awnings and lights are to be demolished, as well as areas where repairs are made, TYP. F Verify all wall packs are in working order, typ. G Northern climates: Any existing snow guards, rakes or rails encountered are to remain. Protect from schedule work. 3/16" = 1'-0"2 South East 3/16" = 1'-0"1 North West Scope Notes - Exterior Elevations 1 New Signage, by others under seperate permit. 2 Not used. 3 Install eyebrow accent fixture and power above ceiling height, typ. Rain diverter at entry door only. 4 Paint cheese pattern. 5 Paint green board pattern. 6 Paint wainscot. 7 Dark broze storefront door. 1/4" = 1'-0"5 Tan Stripe Detail Paint Colors - Exterior WT Manufacturer Color Color # PT-04 PPG Red Gumball PPG1187-7 PT-13 PPG Do Not Disturb PPG1117-6 PT-E1 Sherwin Williams Match Existing - Canoe SW2043 PT-E2 Sherwin Williams Match Existing - Sand SW2059 1 1/2" = 1'-0"4 Eyebrow Section No. Description Date A Permit Set 2023.02.01 1 City Comments 2023.02.23 3 Proposed Perspective Page 45 of 66 CEC Entertainment 1707 Market Pl Blvd Suite 200, Irving, TX 75063 phone 972.258.8507 :: fax 214.496.9635 April 3, 2023 To Whom it May Concern, The color scheme, sizing and design below are a material part of our Chuck E. Cheese brand standard. What’s more, we have used this scheme on many locations around the United States, so it has become synonymous with Chuck E. Cheese. Therefore, we respectfully request that the City approve our use of this scheme for the subject location. If the foregoing is unacceptable, we ask for your approval of the following scheme which allows us to maintain some semblance to our current brand standard. CEC ENTERTAINMENT, LLC David A. Deck, Esq. VP, Legal & Compliance   Page 46 of 66 CITY OF PALM DESERT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MEMORANDUM To: Honorable Chair and Members of the Commission From: Audrey Nickerson, Associate Planner II Date: April 11, 2023 Case No: MISC 23-0020 Subject: Consideration to approve a design review for a façade modification to an existing retail storefront for Lululemon located at 73425 El Paseo, Suite 104. PROJECT SUMMARY The proposal is a request by Lululemon USA Inc. (Applicant) for consideration of a Design Review to modify an existing ground-floor El Paseo storefront located at 73425 El Paseo, Suite 104. The scope of the proposed project will consist of removal of existing exterior awnings, removal of an existing exterior mosaic treatment, buildout of an existing sign band, and installation of a new ivory stucco finish. Staff is concerned with the character of the design which results in a flat, monotonous form which may be incompatible with adjacent developments. BACKGROUND A. Property Description The project site is an existing ground-floor El Paseo storefront located at the El Paseo Village, a 41,000 square-foot, one-story, multi-tenant building for retail and restaurant use located on the south side of El Paseo between Lupine Lane and San Pablo Avenue. The development was originally approved as an expansion of The Gardens on El Paseo by the City Council in June 2009 per Resolution No. 09-41 (Case. No. PP 07-10, CUP 07-18, DA 07-03, and DA 07-04 Amendment #1). This development is characterized by retail and commercial storefronts fronting El Paseo with unique or branded architectural treatments contained within architectural neutral piers throughout the development. The project is proposed within Suite 104, located at the primary El Paseo frontage adjacent a breezeway to the rear parking lot. Suite 104 was previously occupied by Banana Republic and has remained vacant for a few months. The existing Lululemon is relocating to Suite 104 from its current storefront located at the northwest corner of El Paseo and San Pablo. Page 47 of 66 MISC 23-0020 – Lululemon Façade Page 2 of 6 April 11, 2023 B. Zoning, General Plan and Adjacent Uses: Table 1 – Adjacent Land Use and Land Use Designations Location Existing Use General Plan Zoning Project Site Vacant – Previously Banana Republic City Center/Downtown 12-40 Dwelling Units Per Acre Downtown Core Overlay (D-O) North Mixed Use – Retail/Restaurants City Center/Downtown 12-40 Dwelling Units Per Acre Downtown Core Overlay (D-O) South Residential - Condos City Center/Downtown 12-40 Dwelling Units Per Acre Downtown Edge Overlay (D.E.-O) East Mixed Use – Retail/Restaurants City Center/Downtown 12-40 Dwelling Units Per Acre Downtown Core Overlay (D-O) West Mixed Use – Retail/Restaurants City Center/Downtown 12-40 Dwelling Units Per Acre Downtown Core Overlay (D-O) Project Description The project applicant, Lululemon USA Inc. (Applicant), is requesting design review approval for a façade remodel to an existing storefront located at 73425 El Paseo, Suite 104. The request is for Lululemon, a retail store specializing in athletic apparel, which will occupy the entire space. The storefront has El Paseo frontage located at the El Paseo Village shopping development. The Applicant is proposing the following exterior façade modifications to the existing building: • Removal of two (2) existing storefront canopy awnings. • Removal of existing mosaic on east elevation. • Buildout of existing sign band to align with existing bulkhead and extension of vertical expansion joints. • Installation of new ivory stucco finish and painting of existing coping to match. • Removal/Relocation of existing sculpture from landscape area on eastern portion of the façade by landlord, if permitted by Cultural Arts Committee, as described in detail in the Analysis and Zoning Ordinance Summary. No structural modifications are proposed to the existing building. No modifications are proposed to the existing storefront windows and main entry, nor the rear or side elevations. Interior modifications to the floor plan are shown for reference. Exterior signage is shown on the plan set but is not included in the scope of Architectural Review Commission (ARC) review. Exterior signage will be subject to staff review for conformance with the El Paseo Village Signage Criteria. Exterior Colors The following stucco color and corresponding paint color are proposed for the following façade modification: • Dryvit Stucco – 101 Super White – Freestyle - Primary Building Coating • BM #OC-45 – Swiss Coffee – Flat - Metal Coping/Parapet Flashing Page 48 of 66 MISC 23-0020 – Lululemon Façade Page 3 of 6 April 11, 2023 ANALYSIS AND ZONING ORDINACE SUMMARY The subject property is zoned Downtown Core Overlay District (D.O.) which allows retail stores as a permitted use. Revisions to storefront facades are subject to review and approval of a design review by the ARC pursuant to Palm Desert Municipal Code (PDMC) Section 25.68.020 (A)(2). Findings for ARC decisions of design review applications are listed under Palm Desert PDMC Section 25.68.040 as follows: A. That the proposed development conforms to any legally adopted development standards. The proposed façade modification is in conformance with the legally adopted development standards set forth by the PDMC for the DO zoning district. The existing structure is in conformance with applicable development standards including height, coverage, and parking. The proposed project will not create non- conforming conditions for this existing development. The DO zone establishes design guidelines for buildings to incorporate shopfronts with elements such as storefront windows, canopy awnings, and architectural projections (PDMC Section 25.20.031). The proposed project does not satisfy all shopfront façade design guidelines. The design guidelines are recommendations to provide direction for the design intent of the Downtown Districts. As such, alternative design would not result in non-conformance with established development standards. Project design elements that are not consistent with the Downtown Districts Design Guidelines are described in Section E below. B. That the design and location of the proposed development and its relationship to neighboring existing or proposed developments and traffic is such that it will not impair the desirability of investment or occupation in the neighborhood; and that it will not unreasonably interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or proposed developments and that it will not create traffic hazards or congestion. The proposed façade modification is compatible with surrounding developments and will not create additional traffic which would impair investment in the neighborhood. The existing building provides for future tenants to propose unique or branded storefronts which utilize a mix of exterior building materials with an existing neutral pier system. The proposed use is a retail use that will replace a former retail use, therefore, a substantial increase in traffic generation is not anticipated. C. That the design and location of the proposed development is in keeping with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and is not detrimental to the harmonious, orderly, and attractive development contemplated by this title and the General Plan of the City. The proposed façade is generally compatible with the development pattern along El Paseo as it provides a retail storefront within a walkable pedestrian-oriented district. The land use designation is City Center/Downtown in the General Plan which promotes high intensity mixed-use development anchored by civic, cultural, entertainment, and retail activity. The intended built form and character for this Page 49 of 66 MISC 23-0020 – Lululemon Façade Page 4 of 6 April 11, 2023 district consists of buildings at or near the sidewalk to support easy view of storefronts. Staff can affirmatively make this finding but raises concerns on the character of the design as it relates to existing development in the vicinity. The applicant proposes removal of existing awnings, buildout of the existing sign band, and removal of the mosaic detail on the façade. The resulting design alters the building proportions, resulting in a flat, monotonous form. There is no design sensitivity to the existing context of the structure or surrounding development. D. That the design and location of the proposed development would provide a desirable environment for its occupants, as well as for its neighbors, and that it is aesthetically of good composition, materials, textures, and colors. The proposed façade would preserve the existing storefront windows, entry doors, and bulkhead. The remainder of the façade would be modified to remove minor architectural elements and covered with ivory textured stucco. Other storefronts within the existing building utilize unique storefronts featuring a mix of design elements and building materials, unified by a continuous building envelope, consistent with the Downtown Districts Design Guidelines. The Highway 111 Development Code does not establish specific design parameters, and therefore staff can affirmatively make this finding. Staff does raise concerns about the simplicity and lack of shading provided in the proposed design as detailed below: Building Articulation: Architectural elements are intended to enliven building facades with human scale elements and spaces, providing them with depth, shade, and shadow. The proposed project would eliminate existing building articulations and color variations from the building. Buildout of the sign band would result in a flat “boxy” face, exaggerated by application of ivory stucco on the entire building surface. The Applicant proposes extension of the vertical expansion joints on the front of the building to break up the frontage, but no additional elements are proposed to add visual interest to the building exterior. In comparison to other storefronts within the El Paseo Village, which utilize a mix of design elements (i.e., articulation, awnings, etc.) and materials (i.e., stucco, wood, metal, etc.) to create depth and interest, the proposed façade has a monotonous form that is inconsistent with nearby storefronts. Furthermore, the Applicant proposes façade modifications along the northeast elevation, terminating in the corner within the landscaped area, behind an existing statue. This modification would require removal of the existing mosaic tile enhancement on the eastern elevation. The eastern extent of the façade abruptly transitions to the existing façade, which is comprised of deeper warm colors and mosaic enhancement. Assuming the existing statue in that corner remains, the abrupt façade transition would also alter the perspective of the statue from the public right-of-way and eliminate the cohesive design between the existing statue and the complimentary statue in the western portion of the El Paseo Village, which currently exhibits a matching façade. The Applicant has provided a rendering of an alternative design that extends the ivory stucco façade further east to the neutral pier at the breezeway to avoid such an abrupt transition visible from the El Paseo frontage. Page 50 of 66 MISC 23-0020 – Lululemon Façade Page 5 of 6 April 11, 2023 Display Windows: The Design Guidelines recommend clear, lightly tinted (e.g., less than 15%, low emissivity, solar) glass without reflective coating or dark tinting. Instead, frontage types such as arcades and galleries and architectural elements such as awnings and canopies are encouraged to shade shopfront openings. The proposed design includes removal of the existing awnings and no new shade features are proposed along the storefront. As such, the proposed design would reduce shade relief within the building and along the pedestrian corridor in front of the building, especially during summer months when the sun’s trajectory is further north, maximizing impacts on north facing buildings. In addition, The Design Guidelines recommend the maximum width of storefront window bays to be 15 feet. The existing storefront includes two 31.2-foot bays of glass (windows and doorway) separated by the neutral pier. The existing storefront was approved under prior entitlements and the Applicant does not propose any modifications to the windows or entry. Storefront Assemblies: The Design Guidelines recommend a maximum two-foot setback for storefront assemblies from the shop opening. The existing entryway is set back 3 feet from the shopfront opening. The existing storefront was approved under prior entitlements and the Applicant does not propose any modifications to the windows or entry. E. That the proposed use conforms to all the requirements of the zone in which it is located and all other applicable requirements. Zoning Standards: The proposed project conforms with legally adopted development standards set forth by the Downtown Core Overlay District. Art in Public Places Program: The sculpture proposed for removal/relocation in the landscaped area in the eastern portion of the façade is named “Journeys of the Imagination.” On October 14, 2010, the City Council approved placement of the subject sculpture along the El Paseo frontage at the El Paseo Village in lieu of a developer fee payment to the Art in Public Places (AIPP) program. Pursuant to the AIPP Program Guidelines, codified in PDMC Chapter 4.10, once artwork has been accepted by the City in lieu of payment of the AIPP Program fee, it cannot be removed or altered without specific written approval of the Cultural Arts Committee (formerly AIPP Commission). If the art is knowingly removed or altered without prior approval from the Cultural Arts Committee, the owner shall contribute funds equal to the original public art fees, replace the work with another City-approved piece of equal value, or the Certificate of Occupancy may be revoked by City Council upon due notice. As such, the landlord must comply with the AIPP Program Guidelines if they wish to remove or relocate the subject sculpture. F. That the overall development of the land shall be designed to ensure the protection of public health, safety, and general welfare. The proposed modifications are limited to the exterior building façade. These modifications do not alter the land use, accessibility, or facilities on site. In addition, Page 51 of 66 MISC 23-0020 – Lululemon Façade Page 6 of 6 April 11, 2023 the overall building design does not present any adverse impacts to the protection of public health, safety, and general welfare. STAFF RECOMMENDATION As detailed throughout this memo, the proposed façade modification is consistent with all legally adopted development standards and therefore, staff can support approval based on the findings. However, staff is concerned with the character of the design which results in a flat, monotonous form which may be incompatible with adjacent developments. More specifically, staff raises the following concerns regarding the proposed design: • The proposed project lacks character defining design elements utilizing integrated architecture, such as articulation, materials, and color. • The proposed project lacks passive shading elements such as awnings or overhangs. • The Applicant should consider better cohesion with the adjacent façades, as the proposed design may create an abrupt and uncomplimentary transition at the façade’s eastern extent. • The proposed project proposes removal of the “Journeys to the Imagination” statue, which requires review and approval by the Cultural Arts Committee. Should the ARC vote to approve the design review, any modifications required by the ARC should be added to the motion as a condition of approval. The ARC may also vote to continue the case subject to revisions and clear direction for the requested changes. Attachments: 1. Plans Submitted by Applicant Page 52 of 66 Page 53 of 66 Page 54 of 66 Page 55 of 66 Page 56 of 66 Page 57 of 66 Page 58 of 66 Page 59 of 66 Page 60 of 66 Page 61 of 66 Page 62 of 66 Page 63 of 66 Page 64 of 66 Page 65 of 66 CITY OF PALM DESERTATTENDANCE REPORTAdvisory Body: Architectural Review CommissionPrepared By:YearMonthDate 10-Jan 24-Jan 14-Feb 28-Feb 14-Mar 28-Mar 12-Apr 26-Apr 10-May 24-May 14-Jun 28-Jun 12-Jul 26-Jul 9-Aug 23-Aug 13-Sep 27-Sep 11-Oct 25-Oct 8-Nov 22-Nov 13-Dec 27-DecColvard, Dean WallacePP-PP PPPPPPP A P -11Latkovic, NicholasPP-AP PPP P P PP- - - PPPPPP P P -11McAuliffe, MichaelPP-PP PPPA P PP- - - PAPPPP P P -22McIntosh, JamesPP-P P P PA P P PA- - - P PAPPA A P -55Sanchez, FranciscoPP-PP PPPPPP P P -00Vuksic, JohnPA-PP PPP P P PP- - - PPPPPP P A -22Vacancy00Palm Desert Municipal Code 2.34.010:20232022202220222023Total AbsencesOctNovDec2022202220222023M. Gonzalez2022 2022Twice Monthly: Six unexcused absences from regular meetings in any twelve-month period shall constitute an automatic resignation of members holding office on boards that meet twice monthly.Total Unexcused AbsencesJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSep2022Page 66 of 66