Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrd 1062 and 1063 Project Areas 3-4 Additional Environmental Study C7 TINED TO CITY OF PALM DESIIR PASSED TO 2ND READING t 3 ."//JUL[ STAFF REPORT REQUEST: ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 1062 AMENDING THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN, AS AMENDED, FOR PROJECT AREA NO. 3, AS AMENDED, OF THE PALM DESERT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 1063 AMENDING THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR PROJECT AREA NO.4 OF THE PALM DESERT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY SUBMITTED BY: DAVE YRIGOYEN, DIRECTOR OF REDEVELOPMENT DATE: FEBRUARY 26, 2004 CONTENTS: ORDINANCE NO. 1062 FOR PROJECT AREA NO.3 DETERMINATION OF NEED FOR ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY (PROJECT AREA NO. 3) ORDINANCE NO. 1063 FOR PROJECT AREA NO. 4 DETERMINATION OF NEED FOR ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY ( PROJECT AREA NO. 4) Recommendation: By Minute Motion, that the City Council adopt the following ordinances for first reading: 1. Ordinance No. 1062 , an ordinance of the City of Palm Desert amending the Redevelopment Plan for Project Area No. 3 of the Palm Desert Redevelopment Agency; and 2. Ordinance No. 1063 , an ordinance of the City of Palm Desert amending the redevelopment Plan for Project Area No. 4 of the Palm Desert Redevelopment Agency. Executive Summary: Approval of the ordinances for Project Areas Nos. 3 and 4 will provide the project areas with an extension of the time limit to incur debt previously established by the City Council. The current limits are July 17, 2007, for Project Area 3, and July 19, 2013, for Project Area 4. The extension will require the Agency to provide a pass-through to affected taxing agencies which do not currently have pass-through agreements. Extensions for Project Areas 1 and 2 have previously been approved. G:\RDA\Niamh Ortega\WP Data\Cathy\Staff Reports\RDA plan for PA3&4 wpd Adoption of Ordinances amending Project Area Nos. 3 and 4 redevelopment plans February 26, 2004 Page 2 of 3 Discussion In November 1994, the City Council adopted Ordinance Nos. 765, 766, 767, and 768. These adoptions were pursuant to the obligations imposed by AB 1290 establishing new time limits on redevelopment project areas. At that time, the limits adopted were as follows: Project Area No. 1 The 1994 limits in connection with the territory included in the original boundaries of Project Area No. 1 are as follows: the limit on establishing loans, advances and indebtedness is January 1, 2004; the effectiveness of the Plan now terminates on July 16, 2015; and the new limit on paying indebtedness and receiving property taxes is July 16, 2025. The 1994 limits in connection with the territory added to the Project Area by the Second Amendment to the Plan, adopted in 1982, are as follows: the limit on establishing loans, advances and indebtedness is January 1, 2004; the effectiveness of the Plan now terminates on November 25,2021;and the limit on paying indebtedness and receiving property taxes is November 25, 2031. Project Area No. 2 The limit on establishing loans, advances and indebtedness is July 17, 2007; the effectiveness of the Plan will terminate on July 15, 2027; and the limit on paying indebtedness and receiving property taxes is July 15, 2037. Project Area No. 3 The limit on establishing loans, advances and indebtedness is July 17, 2011; the effectiveness of the Plan will terminate on July 17, 2031; and the limit on paying indebtedness and receiving property taxes is July 17, 2041. Project Area No. 4 The limit on establishing loans, advances and indebtedness is July 19, 2013; the effectiveness of the Plan now terminates on July 19, 2033;and the 1994 limit on paying indebtedness and receiving property taxes is July 19, 2043. SB 211 On October 10, 2001, the Governor signed SB 211 (Torlakson) which authorized several extensions to time limits established by AB 1290. The time limit extension, which is the purpose of this report, is the ability to incur debt for Project Areas 3 and 4. During last year's budget crisis, several reports indicated that a moratorium was being considered on the Agency's ability to extend deadlines. Project Area 3's deadline to incur debt sunsets on July 17, 2007. Project Area 4's deadline is July 19, 2013. Staff is prepared to proceed with the extension of the deadlines for those project areas at this time. G\RDA\Niamh Ortega\WP Data\Cathy\Staff Reports\RDA plan for PA3&4.wpd Adoption of Ordinances amending Project Area Nos. 3 and 4 redevelopment plans February 26, 2004 Page 3 of 3 SB 211 Obligations The impacts of this extension have been analyzed through a financial analysis performed by Rosenow Spevacek Group. Approval of this extension creates a pass-through to those affected taxing entities which the Agency has no pass-through agreements with. While current tax increment is not impacted, a new base year would be established for new incremental growth. The affected taxing entities with no pass-through agreements would receive 25%of that new incremental growth as pass-through. In Project Area 3, the first payments to such taxing entities would be in 2012-2013 with a total estimated payment of$1,260.00. In Project Area 4,the payment impact would not be forthcoming until 2022 with a$36,264 total estimated payment. Staff's analysis shows that the loss of the ability to incur debt is more detrimental than the new base year payments to the affected taxing entities. Bond Insurers Prior to amending a project area, the Agency must accomplish an analysis that demonstrates to the Bond Insurer that there is sufficient increment to continue paying the bonds. Additionally, the Agency must receive specific approval from the bond insurers who currently insure our bonds. Staff is currently working with MBIA, our current insurer, demonstrating that the amendment will not impact existing bonds and therefore continues to be the 1.25 coverage ratio for Project Area No. 4, as obligated by the bond documents. The Agency issued bonds in Project Area No. 3 in August 2003. The Agency indicated to the bond insurers that we would adopt an ordinance amending the project area for SB 211. The insurers gave us a commitment based on this. The Agency is not seeking the bond insurers' permission for Project Area No. 3. Staff recommends that the City Council approve the Ordinances and move them to a second reading. Submitted by: Department Head: D id rigoy n, for of Re evelopment ti McCarthy, AC /Re pment Approved: Carlos L. 0 a, City Manager Paul S. Gibson, Director of Finance CITY COUNCIVACTION: APPROVED VV DENIED RECEIVED OTHER If' G:\RDAWiamh Ortega\WP Data\Cathy\Staff Reports\RDA plan for PA3&4.wpd MEET IN� 4 E / � `�' ` AYES• I U Y NOES: ABSENT: LDS ABSTAIN: VERIFIED BY: DK Original Qn File uffth City Clerk's Office