Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRelinquishment of State Highways to City CITY OF PALM DESERT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF REPORT REQUEST: RELINQUISHMENT OF STATE HIGHWAYS TO THE CITY OF PALM DESERT DATE: June 28, 2001 ATTACHMENTS: L. Flores Fax ( 1/19/01) R. Folkers Memo ( 3/31/00) R. Folkers Memo ( 1/09/97) R. Folkers Memo (12/12/96) M. Greenwood Memo ( 6/13/01) K. Weller Memo (11/30/00) T. Bassler Memo ( 6/23/00) Recommendation: That the City Manager create a task force composed of two City councilpersons and City staff to determine the solution for the subject matter. Background: In January 1997, Mayor Bob Spiegel, City Manager Ray Diaz and two staff members, John Wohlmuth and Dick Folkers, met with the Caltrans District 8 Director, Stan Lisiewicz, to discuss various issues among which was the possibility of the City taking jurisdictions of Highway 111 and Highway 74. The City of Palm Springs, Cathedral City and Rancho Mirage have taken over Highway 111. The City of La Quinta has been discussing the matter recently with District 8 Caltrans in San Bernardino. During the budget preparation process for the current fiscal year, staff gathered information regarding the City taking over control of these two state highways. The City Council requested the staff to begin to do an in-depth cost and impact analysis; however, neither Caltrans nor the staff was able to determine an appropriate formula. to accomplish this task. This information was requested from the district director in the summer of 2000. Subsequent conversations with staff were undertaken regarding our requests for the cost analyses. Recently this matter was again discussed with G:IPubWorkstMary GaugushlWord DatalRelinquishment of State Hwys to City of Palm Desert CC Mtg June 28.rjf.doc Staff Report Relinquishment of State Highways to the City of Palm Desert June 28, 2001 Page 2 of 3 Acting District 8 Director Anne Mayer. Attached are copies of memorandums that provide background information on this matter. Currently the City of Palm Desert is responsible for median landscape maintenance, as well as parkway landscape maintenance where there are frontage roads, painting red curb to prohibit parking, financial participation in the cost for traffic maintenance and energy costs (50%), and the cost of engineering design and construction of street widenings with 100 percent reimbursement for all work in the state right-of-way from the Riverside County Transportation Commission. The Caltrans District Director is responsible for all claims within the state right-of-way, street maintenance, sweeping once a week, maintenance of traffic signals (50% of the cost), maintenance of signing and issuance of encroachment permits for developers and city. The steps that Caltrans takes to go through the relinquishment process with a city are: 1. Assess the system conditions; i.e., everything in roadway such as pavement, drainage, signing, striping and traffic signals. 2. Reach an agreement with the future maintaining agency on those items needing upgrading. 3. Negotiate on the value of the upgrades. 4. Caltrans determine the total maintenance costs for a five-year window after the relinquishment. There are different points of views among the staff. The engineers who have to deal with the Caltrans bureaucracy are very frustrated. It takes an extraordinary amount of time to get answers, reviews and approval of encroachment permits. On the other hand, those in a fiscal control roll have concerns about the liabilities of taking over either one or both state routes. Unfortunately, each opinion has positive and negative aspects. Since the cities to the west of Palm Desert have taken over Highway 111, the city managers and public works staff are satisfied. As for the current fiscal implications, that aspect has not been addressed in this report. G:1PubWorkslMary GaugushlWord DatalRelinquishmenf of State Hwys to City of Palm Desert CC Mtg June 28.rjf.doc Staff Report Relinquishment of State Highways to the City of Palm Desert June 28, 2001 Page 3of3 STATE HIGHWAY TAKEOVER Although the Cities of Palm Springs, Cathedral City and Rancho Mirage have successfully accomplished the takeover of Highway 111, the City of Palm Desert should diligently review the pros and cons of this monumental decision for the City Council. CONCLUSION Based upon the staffs' review of this question, it is recommended that a task force be comprised of two council members and selected City staff to thoroughly review this matter in order to provide the entire City Council with a recommended position for their consideration. Submitted By: • Richa d J. Folk , P.E. Assistant City Manager for Development Services Approval: ialitAg-t—, nager f2/ CITY COUNCIL ACTION: ;APPROVED ✓* DENIED RECEIVED OTHER RJF/mg MEETING,DATE J 4- pa AYES: D.A -�/ru��Z Ju FLe 1 L,,AJ1 K,o U ) *Approved staff NOES: '^recommendation with ABSENT: .1)a- kf ,-.nit Councilman Robert Spiegel ABSTAIN: —AA-6m J2- O and Mayor Pro-Tempore VERIFIED BY: e,e9 . At it Richard Kelly as Council Original on File with City C1 k's Office representatives. G:IPub Works\Mary Gaugushl Word DatalRelinquishment of State Hwys to City of Palm Desert CC Mtg June 28.rjf.doc JAN. -19' 01 (FRI) 18 :25 DPT OF mn" 0 TEL:909 4129 P. 001 EXHIBIT "A" STATE OF CALIFORNIA-DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FACSIMILE COVER ADM-0172 (REV. 3/93) FM 821372 CI* Attention: From: Department of Transportation Mr. Dick Folkers, Director of Public Works Local Assistance 464 Fourth Street, 6thFloor San Bernardino.CA 92401-1400 Unit/Company: Name of Sender. City of Palm Desert Louis W. Flores Date: Total Pages(including cover sheet): January 19,2001 District/City: FAX#(Include area code): ATSS FAX: Palm Desert, CA (909) 383-4129 8-670-4129 Phone#(Include area code): FAX#(Include area code); Phone#(Include area code): ATSS PHONE: (760)346-0611 (760)341-7098 I (909) 383-4030 8-670-4030 DISPOSITION OF ORIGINAL: OURGENT For Approval Otnformation OFor Comment Per Reg ❑DESTROY RETURN CALL FOR PICK UP COMMENTS: Dear Dick: Summarized below for your use is expense data representing a five-year history of costs to operate State Route 74 and State Route 111 within the limits of the City of Palm Desert. Categories of expenses listed are as follows: Maintenance,Encroachment Permits, Highway Operations,Electrical Operations and administrative overhead. Maintenance costs involve actual value for materials and labor expended during each of the five fiscal years reported. Encroachment permit costs are quantified as the sums of staff permit review time and staff inspection time for encroachment permits that occurred within the same period. The values for Highway Operations are taken from workload records for the routes. The values for Electrical Operations are estimated as a proportion of their total workload. Administrative Overhead is estimated as I0%of all costs. State Route 111 s5e C��/ LT. h* Maintenance: S 566,000.00 Encroachment Permits 17,000.00 u I/.Lc f/d')f Highway Operations 85,000.00 Electrical Operations 68,000.00 Administrative Overhead 74,000.00 Five year operating costs S 810,000.00 for State Route 111. Approximate cost per year : $ 162,000.00 Approximate cost per year per mile: S 40,500.00 State Route 74 Maintenance: S 170,000.00 Encroachment Permits 12,000.00 Highway Operations 85,000.00 Electrical Operations 34,000.00 Administrative Overhead 30,000.00 Five year operating costs S 331,000.00 for State Route 74. ✓_ _• _ Approximate cost per year : $ 66,200.00 - �^ Approximate cost per year per mile: 5 11,030.0 Louis W.Flores. Chief.Office of Local Assistance Received Jan-18-2001 05:08pm From-808 383 4128 To-PALM DESERT PUBLIC W Page 001 e ' EXHIBIT "B" INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM CITY OF PALM DESERT TO: Ramon A. Diaz, City Manager FROM: Richard J. Folkers, ACM/Public Works Director SUBJECT: CALTRANS' RELINQUISHMENT OF STATE ROUTES TO THE CITY OF PALM DESERT —WHITE PAPER DATE: March 31, 2000 As you know, the Public Works Department has periodically asked that Highway 111 be taken back from Caltrans as a city street. An example for this request is the frustration that Public Works staff have experienced in trying to obtain approval of plans and specifications for the Highway 111 and Highway 74/Monterey Avenue project as well as Highway 111 and Portola Avenue; both of which we hope to construct this summer. Our third submittal for Highway 111 and Highway 74 will be sent to Caltrans by the end of March. Basically, we are continually running in circles when we try to construct improvements on Highway 111 . This same problem holds true for the proposed improvements at Highway 111 and Portola Avenue. Another example is the traffic signal system along Highway 111 which is not coordinated properly. As you probably recall, we retained a consultant at our cost to prepare the new timing plans and when they were submitted to Caltrans, they modified them. It is very frustrating when we are continuously receiving complaints regarding the traffic signal progression and timing on Highway 111 over which we have no control. In talking with Diana Barich, Deputy District Director of Operations, she indicated that Caltrans would give us five years worth of maintenance money. When I was in San Diego earlier this month, I asked Stan Lisiewicz if he could give me an idea of the liability activities, such as claims and accidents on Highway 111, as you and Paul Gibson were very concerned with that matter. Stan referred me to Skeeter McMurry of Caltrans District 8 Claims Department (909-383-4313) to obtain information on the number of accidents and claims experience. In addition, I called the Cities of Cathedral City, Rancho Mirage, and Palm Springs to determine their experiences. According to Skeeter, they have only paid $150 for tar on a car by a state resurfacing contractor. EXHIBIT "B" Page 2 March 31 , 2000 SUBJECT: CALTRANS' RELINQUISHMENT OF STATE ROUTES TO THE CITY OF PALM DESERT —WHITE PAPER Since 1985 there were twelve claims on Highway 111 and four claims on Highway 74. That's almost fifteen years of claim experience for almost six miles. I discussed this with Paul Gibson, and he felt that people are afraid to put claims in to Caltrans. Well, they had $614 million of claims in the past years for District 8 that covers the Counties of Riverside and San Bernardino. They only paid $9 million to date. We contacted the Cities of Rancho Mirage, Cathedral City and Palm Springs. Pat Pratt, Rancho Mirage City Manager, felt the accident experience or claims have not caused them any problems. Also, they have been able to get the necessary street work done sooner and with considerably less hassle. He said, "It's the greatest thing that ever happened", taking control of Highway 111 . Dave Faessel, City Engineer of Cathedral City, felt it was the best thing they ever did as they were able to get their reconstruction done easier and cheaper. He feels the accident rate is lower and they have had no adverse claim experience to his knowledge. Dave Barakian, City Engineer of Palm Springs, felt the same way. Since they traded streets with Caltrans, he feels the accidents and claims are not a factor. Therefore, we recommend that the City of Palm Desert take back jurisdiction of Highway 111 as well as Highway 74. C ARD J. FC KERS, P.E. RJF/ms EXHIBIT "C` INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM CITY OF PALM DESERT TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Richard J. Folkers, ACM/Public Works Director SUBJECT: INFORMATIONAL ITEM: CONSIDERATION OF ACCEPTANCE OF HIGHWAY 111 AND HIGHWAY 74 BY THE CITY OF PALM DESERT FROM CALTRANS DISTRICT 8 DATE: January 9, 1997 In May 1989, our city was contacted by Ken Steele, then District Director of Caltrans District 8 with regard to a meeting about the relinquishment of Highway 111 between Highway 74 and Interstate 10 near the Whitewater Channel. The meeting was the result of concerns by the Cities of Palm Springs, Cathedral City, Rancho Mirage, and us on various matters. We were concerned about the problems with the interconnection of Highway 111 as well as the need for modifications of the median ends so that pedestrians would not be endangered as they crossed Highway 111 at signalized intersections. At that time, there was consideration of Caltrans taking the Mid-Valley Parkway as a substitute for the aforementioned section of Highway 111. Various meetings were held with Caltrans and the Cities of Palm Springs, Cathedral City, and Rancho Mirage with regard to this situation. In August of that year, City Manager Bruce Altman sent a letter to Ken Steele discussing the matter of relinquishment and requesting that Caltrans provide a check in the amount of $300,000 to cover the cost of relinquishment from Highway 74 to Rancho Mirage's city limits. There were other considerations since at that time Cathedral City was looking for support for the relinquishment of Highway 111 through their town. Other items had to do with Cathedral City substantially supporting the Metrolink Station planned to be located near the Price Club; also, that Caltrans would participate in the Metrolink Station development with financing and engineering support, and lastly that any seismic retrofit of the Palm Valley Bridge or the Magnesia Falls Bridge would be done wholly at the expense of Caltrans for a five-year period starting whenever the relinquishment took place. These matters were considered preliminary discussion and were to be brought to the City Council when appropriate. • • EXHIBIT "C" Page 2 January 9, 1997 SUBJECT: INFORMATIONAL ITEM: CONSIDERATION OF ACCEPTANCE OF HIGHWAY 111 AND HIGHWAY 74 BY THE CITY OF PALM DESERT FROM CALTRANS DISTRICT 8 As the City Council is probably aware, Palm Springs, Cathedral City, and Rancho Mirage have accepted Highway 111 through their communities and the payment of $300,000 has been provided to Cathedral City and Rancho Mirage. The status on the financial negotiations with Caltrans in Palm Springs has not been resolved as I understand it. In any event, the Public Works Department feels that the delays in processing the permit for both the storm drain portion and the street widening and traffic signal portions at Deep Canyon Road and Highway 111 are excessive. Every time we deal with Caltrans on a project, it takes far longer than necessary, and we do not see these problems changing regardless of having meetings with Caltrans. In conclusion, the Public Works staff would be glad to provide any additional information that the City Council would like or proceed if the City Council wishes to do so on this matter. RICHARD J. F /r\ERS, P.E. REVIEWED AND CONCUR CITY MANAGER RJF/ms (Attachment) • EXHIBIT "D" INTER MEMO OF F ICE To: Ray Diaz, City Manager From: Richard J. Folkers, ACM/Public Works Director Subject: TAKE OVER OF HIGHWAYS 111 AND 74 WITHIN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT FROM CALTRANS DISTRICT 8 - SAN BERNARDINO Date: December 12, 1996 As we discussed recently, we have several projects coming up which will require reviews and cooperation from Caltrans District 8 to obtain encroachment permits for work on the subject highways. The following is a list and brief description of projects: 1) Entryway to Palms to Pines Shopping Center between Plaza Way and Highway 74 2) Upgrading of the Intersection of Highways 111 & 74/Monterey Avenue This project will provide widening on the southeast corner, a free-flow right turn lane for eastbound Highway 111 on the southwest corner, and dual turns for eastbound and westbound Highway 111 as well as northbound Highway 74. 3) Upgrading of the Intersection of Highway 111 & San Pablo Avenue This project will provide the necessary capacity for the development of The Gardens on El Paseo. 4) Widening on the Southwest Corner of Portola Avenue & Highway 111 All of these projects have been funded except for the last one which will be done in conjunction with the development of the former Arco gas station widening on the southwest corner of the intersection. Attached is a copy of a letter from Kris Schulze of Keith International covering the delays we have experienced to obtain an encroachment permit for the intersection widening project at Deep Canyon Road and Highway 111. One example that Kris EXHIBIT "D" Page 3 December 12, 1996 SUBJECT: TAKE OVER OF HIGHWAYS 111 & 74 WITHIN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT FROM CALTRANS DISTRICT 8 - SAN BERNARDINO Approximately one-half of all signal complaints which are received by Public Works are for state highway signals. Citizens typically do not care to hear that we cannot directly respond to their concerns and many complain about unnecessary "red tape". The Public Works Department has documented cases of citizens sending multiple letters followed by multiple phone calls only to be given nonsensical reasoning for refusing to address signal issues. This situation does not reflect well on the ability of the city to respond to the needs of the community. Consequently we suffer the ill will that should be directed toward Caltrans. We have finally gotten an agreement and/or a meeting of the minds with regard to beginning the design for the traffic signal at Haystack Road and Highway 74. Mike Errante has been working with Louis Flores, Chief of Local Assistance, on developing an agreement. No Parking Red Curb Several years ago at our Council's request Caltrans allowed us to remove most of the no parking signs along Highway 111; however, we were then required to paint the curb red which we have done periodically, so this is another aspect of the maintenance we have taken over that should have been their responsibility. Traffic Signal Maintenance With regard to the traffic signal maintenance, currently we pay half of the traffic signal costs and have run into considerable difficulty when we have tried to upgrade the traffic signals to provide the Opticom feature. They have required us to pull all new wires in the mast arm signs and standards when it was only necessary to pull one wire. Going through the design process with them is time consuming and frustrating. In fact, we were the first city in old District 8 (before they took in all of Riverside County) to try to install Opticom on a state route. Sweeping At the present time, we have an agreement with Caltrans that provides for us to be reimbursed for the weekly sweeping of the state highways. This is something that is vital to a world class community like ours. We occasionally need to sweep more frequently for special events, etc., and do so at our cost. EXHIBIT "D" Page 5 SUBJECT: TAKE OVER OF HIGHWAYS 111 & 74 WITHIN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT FROM CALTRANS DISTRICT 8 -SAN BERNARDINO December 12, 1996 On Wednesday, December 11, I spoke with Louis Flores of Local Assistance at District 8 in San Bernardino. Louis was involved in the negotiations with Rancho Mirage, Cathedral City, and Palm Springs regarding Highway 111, so he was very familiar with the procedure. When Ken Steele was district director, he had the ability to authorize up to $300,000 for projects without review by headquarters in Sacramento. This is the reason the $300,000 limitation was established for the three cities. Fortunately, or unfortunately, that limitation has been raised to $1 million; however, the $300,000 was estimated on the cost for work that would have to be done on State Route 111 to bring it up to an acceptable condition. Louis indicated that he did not see a problem with the City of Palm Desert taking over Highway 111 through the city. We also discussed Highway 74 and since that had never been mentioned before, he indicated he would have to talk to Stan Lisiewicz. Louis indicated that the state had been considering a 2-tier system along the lines of Tier 1 being the freeway system and Tier 2 being the state routes that go through communities. Further, we talked about the proposal that had been presented to Ken Steele by CVAG wherein the Mid-Valley Parkway would become Highway 111, and I indicated to Louis that if it came across on Gerald Ford Drive, the route could turn and go north on Monterey Avenue to continue across on Gerald Ford Drive to Cook Street and go north on Cook Street to intercept 1-10. Louis indicated that the environmental document for the Mid Valley Parkway was somewhat flawed in that they had asked that the cities and CVAG follow the NEPA process (federal) wherein the document processed was under the CEQA (State of California) process so there could be some problems withe regard to this being a state route. In any event, since Ken Steele has left District 8, their enthusiasm about taking over the Mid Valley parkway has waned considerably. I have not spoken with Bill Hughes, contract City Engineer for Indian Wells, or Richard Cota, City Engineer for Indio, about the matter but I have discussed this briefly with Chris Vogt, the new City Engineer for La Quinta. Chris indicated that La Quinta might consider it but the matter would have to be referred to his city manager and council. Earlier this week, I contacted Dave Faessel from Cathedral City to determine what had happened regarding their situation. As you recall, the whole idea of Cathedral City taking over Highway 111 started in 1992 when the current city manager, Bruce Liedstrom, developed a plan for the downtown redevelopment. The actual transfer of jurisdiction took place in July 1995 using the authority as part of SB 111 that was authorized for the city by Senator Presley. I spoke with Bruce Harry and Eldon Lee EXHIBIT "E" CITY OF PALM DESERT i PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT :t►=� . INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM ....................... To: Joseph S. Gaugush, Director of Public Works/City Engineer From: Mark Greenwood, Engineering Manager Subject: TRAFFIC DATA ON HIGHWAY 111 AND HIGHWAY 74 WITHIN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT Date: June 13, 2001 The following information is provided per your request: ROADWAY ADT PEAK MONTH ADT COLLISIONS (7/1/99-6/30/00) HIGHWAY 111 38000 44000 212 ' HIGHWAY74 19000 20300 40 MARK GREENWOOD, P.E. H:lmgreenwoodlwpdocsWighway Traffic Data.wpd :BIT "F7- N O V 3 2000 INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM UBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CITY OF PALM DESERT CITY OF PALM DESERT TO: DICK FOLKERS,ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER FORDEVELOPMENT SERVICES , FROM: ye-9' KEN WELLER, RISK MANAGER�C `Ai-C� SUBJECT: ACQUISITION OF HIGHWAY 111/HIGHWAY 74 DATE: NOVEMBER 30, 2000 In our conversation you requested that I call the cities of Rancho Mirage, Cathedral City and Palm Springs to gather information on their claim history as it related to their acquisition of their Hwy 111 segment. The second part of your request was to determine what additional costs to the CJPIA would result from this acquisition of Hwy 111. Claim History SWITRS reports in the Traffic Engineer's office will show the number of accidents on Highway 111 or Highway 74 for the past year(s). The attached claim history for the City will show the claims filed which have occurred since February 1998 to present. Although these claims are routinely referred to the state,we are still a party to the claim until released or the claim is settled. In preparing this report, I do not have a complete list of claims filed directly to the state in which we are not named as a party to the claim. Only with an accurate claim history will I be able to evaluate the true cost of taking over Highway 111/Highway 74 as it would relate to the increased cost of an insurance pool contribution. Claim History of the Other Cities Rancho Mirage I have spoken with Scott Morgan of Rancho Mirage. His comments relating to claims associated with Hwy 111 were positive in that they have not experienced any significant claims as a result of taking over Highway 111. Rancho Mirage is a member of the PARMA Insurance Authority. Mr. Morgan was not aware of any significant rate increase in premiums to PARMA because of their claim experience on Hwy 111. The issue that Mr. Morgan said negatively was the additional maintenance costs associated with the Hwy 111 segment. Cathedral City I spoke with Dave Faessel and he said that they have not experienced any significant claims as a result of taking over Highway 111 either. He also mentioned that the widening of Highway 111 in the downtown area has improved the traffic safety on this street segment. Mr. Faessel's only G:\RiskMgmt\Rochelle Fleisher\wpdata\W P6I DATAUCENW\DFHW Y I I I.WPD EXHIBIT "F" DICK FOLKERS, ACM FOR DEVELOPMENT SERVICES NOVEMBER 30, 2000 PAGE 2 negative comment relating to their acquisition of Hwy. 111 was the issue of maintenance costs associated with the acquisition of their Hwy. 111 segment. Additional Insurance Costs to the City Associated With a Take Over of Highway 111/Highway 74 The CJPIA is an insurance pool not an insurance policy. Our contribution to the pool is on our claim history. Using the SWITERS report will better define the amount and types of claims we can expect. Also a report of the state showing the actual claims filed along our segment of Hwy. 111 would be necessary in determining any impact on or future pool contributions. Because the Hwy. 111 segment is probably the most used of all of our streets, we could expect a high traffic accident rate and accordingly a higher claim rate. Although all traffic accidents do not result in a claim under our CJPIA system, our claim history is the basis for determining our contribution to the pool. The City SIR is $20,000. This means that all claims below that limit will be our responsibility and the amount above this amount is taken from the pool and assessed against our contribution. Summary To acquire the Hwy. 111 segment would not require up-front additional premium contributions to the CJPIA. However, as our claims history related to the acquisition of Highway 111 segment develops, and should our claim history show an increase in claims, our contribution to the pool will then increase. This will not occur immediately but could impact us in the future. The one negative issue that continues to surface is maintenance costs associated with this acquisition. On a more positive note, the ability to control traffic changes caused by construction was a positive theme by both cities. I have contacted the Palm Springs City Engineer, Tom Cartwright, and we have not been able to connect so that I can obtain the information you requested. I am forwarding the information I currently have so that you can proceed with your report. As soon as I get the information, I will forward it to you. It is also my understanding that Paul Gibson has been requested to look at the state's claims history for Hwy 111. I'm sure this information will be of greater value to your report. G:UtiakMgmt\Rochelle Fleisher\wpdata\WP6I DATA\KENW\DFHWY 111.WPD CLAIM HISTORY OF HWY 111 and HWY 74 Since Feburary 1998 to Present LESLEY HWY 111 /TOWN CENTER WAY 2/20/98 TOM 3/26/98 DENY Refer CARL UNSPECIFIED JOAN AUTO ACCIDENT (FATAL) BASSLER to Cal-Trans WARREN COHEN#358 #352 GEORGE SULLIVAN 3/26/98 ....... ...... .... ..:.: ...::.:. :.;.:... ':<:.:;;:: 'CLAUD's;: :" I' LLENPAI 11�t REE_HWY;;€;::a: l:a tzil s> :» :::::: .>>KEN » » ::: >:I j< B: :::: »': .:<:': .':::. Y I3EN Re �AIi.L CTI*r�I'E��EI�. ...:Iosed:.'::: :..:;:. ...................... .:........ j� /� }Hy y♦�T y}y1 wry,y. 1p yM♦ y}+.(yy� �y�/�.�[♦, ♦[�11� ........ ... .:.. ..:....T 1�..� � i�:::::.�:::::: ::l{:�•LI.NMi:,).;:�4�i.�4!.:: JiY.V.%'.�'1�.::i'.::::1�:1'.A�:::::: :i::::i:::::::::!:. ::.�©� ��. >:'.::� .::::?' ':'.'..'':::::::�:'.:':'::i::i::::.:i::: .:#..::. ::'i:::::<:i:::.. .. �: .. ::>:>::. :.:.:.:.. . Rti3$Y;�EE::..: ; :t�UTOACG`11�E�I�'�IIT:.I3'i'.RED).�r�HT;:: ::;2l��f� KIwI+T.:::.:::'.;;;;:;:.;: :'3/11 ::;::>::>::.:; DEDY:'A:�IIi:: '>OA.Ki.,;:; . :':::; •[3NSPEgrI'1BD :.Closed . :: ,. ... .:.:_ .... .... ... ::.::.;;:.;:.;...:..:... .:..:: .;. .. • LL,ER<:::>::::». ....<:::::::;<: ;':::;:: ;REFER.Tf?.:...<:::3T�ARRED:_:;:;:.. '.::: I#.f1I3:;: ,':: '.;;'.';.:.;:.;:::.; ....:. ,.;.::<:: .:•.:•: ::::: ELIZA:BET H . AUTt)A��IDE�I`i'::I�:1✓D EI' : :>::;:;:.:' :;':>,' >::>:.;: . ;>:>::::>::,::::< ;::;.:;:.,:: ., >::: .:::::.::::::................................ ........ .... ..................... . ... . �}f13L40 .:;;:'.. :.:':.. ...I3ENY.Re£�r':>: GA:RL'.::...::::_ �4�04��#'.':: :'. .. ::�Iosec(.,> < -COUSINS ;: :::;'..:;.: . o GaLTrans..... .WARRED::::>;::.: '.': .:' :::::.;::.;:....':::.;:..;:.;:;.;;:.::.;:':.;:.;:.;:.;'.::.::;.;::.:;';:>;:::.::: ':>::.':.>:'..: <::::::.>::;:..':>;.. . ;:.:..:;:.:..:. KATHI L. VEHICLE ACCIDENT HWY 74/ 6/8/00 KEN 7/13/00 DENY Refer CARL UNSPECIFIED SCRIVENS PITAHAYA WELLER to Cal-Trans WARREN #419 PRESTON VEHICLE ACCIDENT ON HWY 74/ 6/12/00 KEN 7/13/00 DENY Refer CARL $5,508,500.00 HIENFIELD INDIAN WAY WELLER to Cal-Trans WARREN #420 NOTE: The the highlghted cases are closed,the unhighlighted are open bd 13 y i EXHIBIT "G" r : ti TO: Richard J. Folkers, ACM/Public Works Director FROM: Tom Bassler, Sr. Management Analyst SUBJECT: HIGHWAY 111 AND 74 EXPENSES DATE: June 23, 2000 Street Sweeping: Presently, the City is reimbursed $16,625.70 a year for sweeping 10 curb miles of Hwy. 111 and 4.7 curb miles of Hwy. 74. The sweeping is done by SunLine at a rate of $21.75 per curb mile. Traffic Signal and Safety Lighting: On the average the signal and lighting utilities run $6,000 per month. The City presently pays 50% or $3,000 per month. Annual cost to the City would increase from $36,000 to $72,000 per year. Landscape Maintenance: All landscape related costs along the state highways run about $150,000 per year. These costs are not reimbursed by the state and therefore will remain the same. Curb Painting: It would cost the City about $4,400 per year to paint red curb along the state highway. Hwy1 11&74expns-prm