Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPost-Meeting Agenda Package - StudySession_Apr11_2024 PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL, SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE PALM DESERT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, AND HOUSING AUTHORITY MEETING REGULAR MEETING POST-MEETING AGENDA Thursday, April 11, 2024 3:00 p.m. Council Chamber, City Hall 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, California NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the purpose of the Study Session is to review the items listed on the agenda. No action will be taken. This is a joint meeting of the Palm Desert City Council, Successor Agency to the Palm Desert Redevelopment Agency, and the Palm Desert Housing Authority. Pursuant to Assembly Bill 2449, this meeting may be conducted as a hybrid meeting allowing public access via teleconference or in person, and up to two Councilmembers may attend remotely. WATCH THE MEETING LIVE: Watch the City Council meeting live at the City’s website: www.palmdesert.gov under the “Council Agenda” link at the top of the homepage, or on the City’s YouTube Channel. OPTIONS FOR PARTICIPATING IN THIS MEETING: If unable to attend the meeting in person, you may choose from the following options: OPTION 1: VIA EMAIL Send your comments by email to: CouncilMeetingComments@palmdesert.gov. Emails received prior to 10:00 a.m. on the day of the City Council meeting will be made part of the record and distributed to the City Council. Emails will not be read aloud at the meeting. OPTION 2: LIVE VIA ZOOM Access via palmdesert.gov/zoom or zoom.us, click “Join Meeting” and enter Webinar ID 833 6744 9572. 1. OPTION 3: LIVE VIA TELEPHONE (213) 338-8477 and enter Meeting ID 833 6744 9572 followed by #.1. Indicate that you are a participant by pressing # to continue.2. During the meeting, press *9 to add yourself to the queue and wait for the Mayor or City Clerk to announce your name/phone number. Press *6 to unmute your line and limit your comments to three minutes. 3. Pages City Council Study Session Page 2 of 34 1.CALL TO ORDER - STUDY SESSION 2.STUDY SESSION TOPICS 2.a STUDY SESSION: UPDATED MILLS ACT ELIGIBLE SCOPES OF WORK 5 2.b STUDY SESSION: UPDATE ON DINING DECK PROGRAM 23 RECOMMENDATION: Provide feedback on Dining Deck Program 3.ADJOURNMENT 4.PUBLIC NOTICES NOTE: Pursuant to Assembly Bill 2449, this meeting may be conducted by teleconference. Study Session is accessible in person or on the City’s website: www.palmdesert.gov under the Council Agenda link at the top of the page. Agenda Related Materials: Pursuant to Government Code §54957.5(b)(2) the designated office for inspection of records in connection with this meeting is the Office of the City Clerk, Palm Desert Civic Center, 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert. Staff reports for all agenda items considered in open session, and documents provided to a majority of the legislative bodies are available for public inspection at City Hall and on the City’s website at www.palmdesert.gov by clicking “Council Agenda” at the top of the page. Americans with Disabilities Act: It is the intention of the City of Palm Desert to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) in all respects. If, as an attendee or a participant at this meeting, or in meetings on a regular basis, you will need special assistance beyond what is normally provided, the City will attempt to accommodate you in every reasonable manner. Please contact the Office of the City Clerk, (760) 346-0611, at least 48 hours prior to the meeting to inform us of your needs and to determine if accommodation is feasible. AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING I, Níamh M. Ortega, Assistant City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert, do hereby certify, under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California, that the foregoing agenda for the Palm Desert City Council, Successor Agency for the Palm Desert Redevelopment Agency, and Housing Authority, was posted on the City Hall bulletin board and City website www.palmdesert.gov no less than 72 hours prior to the meeting. /S/ Níamh M. Ortega Assistant City Clerk City Council Study Session Page 3 of 34 Page 4 of 33 Page 1 of 1 CITY OF PALM DESERT STAFF REPORT MEETING DATE: April 11, 2024 PREPARED BY: Carlos Flores, AICP, Principal Planner REQUEST: STUDY SESSION: UPDATED MILLS ACT ELIGIBLE SCOPES OF WORK RECOMMENDATION: Provide feedback on proposed changes to the Mills Act Contract Guidelines. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: Mills Act contracts require a 10-year work plan indicating how the tax savings will be reinvested into the rehabilitation, restoration, and/or ongoing maintenance of the property. The purpose of this study session is to provide an overview of proposed changes to Appendix A of the Guidelines pertaining to eligible scope of work criteria that are a component of the Mills Act Contracts. Appendix A categorizes proposed improvements as either contributing to “structure integrity”, “architectural/historical integrity,” or ineligible. Legal Review: This report has been reviewed by the City Attorney’s office. Cultural Resources Preservation Committee (CRPC) At its regular meeting on January 24, 2024, the CRPC recommended approval of the draft Guidelines revisions, with the condition that staff amend to make the repair or new construction of walls or fences eligible under Architectural and/or Historical integrity. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Presentation Page 5 of 33 Page 6 of 33 Mills Act Background & Criteria CITY COUNCIL APRIL 11, 2024 4/11/2024 CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION 1 Page 7 of 33 Mills Act - Background Legislation enacted in 1972 - Authority for Local governments to enter contracts with owners of qualified historic properties who actively participate in the restoration and maintenance of their historic properties according to the US Secretary of Interior Historic Standards, in exchange for receiving property tax relief. Each local government establishes their own criteria and determines how many contracts they will allow in their jurisdiction. Involved Agencies: City of Palm Desert, CA Board of Equalization, Riverside County Tax Assessors Office Framework established in: California Government Code, Article 12, Sections 50280 - 50290 California Revenue and Taxation Code, Article 1.9, Sections 439 – 439.4 24/11/2024 CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION Page 8 of 33 Mills Act – How does it work 4/11/2024 CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION 3 Mills Act assess using the Income Approach to Value vs. Market Approach to Value For owner-occupied properties, the "income" is determined based on comparable rents for similar properties in the area. For income-producing properties, the income amount is based on actual rent received and typical rents for similar properties with similar uses. Page 9 of 33 Mills Act – Hypothetical Example 44/11/2024 CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION Single Family Home Assessed Value: $500,000 Taxes: $5,000 (1.0%) Gross Income $48,000 ($4,000 * 12 mo.) Less Expenses $5,000 (insurance, repairs, utilities) Net Income $43,000 ($48,000 - $5,000) Capitalization Rate (Riverside County Assessor) 13.55%Interest component at 4.25% Historic property risk component at 4% Amortization component at 4.3% Property tax component at 1.0% New Valuation $317,344 ($43,000 / 0.1355) New Taxes $3,174 ($317,344 * 0.01) Annual Tax Reduction $1,826 (37%)($5,000 - $3,174) Page 10 of 33 Contract – 10-YR Rehabilitation/Restoration Plan Mills Act contracts require a 10-year work plan indicating how the tax savings will be reinvested into the rehabilitation, restoration, and/or ongoing maintenance of the property. The intent is to: Preserves life of the historic features of the property Corrects any critical systems or structural deficiencies Reverses inappropriate alterations All work must meet the Secretary of the Interiors Standards for Rehabilitation There is no requirement that the cost of the rehab/restoration and maintenance equal the amount of tax savings. 54/11/2024 CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION Page 11 of 33 Contract Compliance Under the state legislation enabling Mills Act Contracts, the City is required to conduct an in-person inspection once every five years to ensure that the property is being properly maintained (or restored) in accordance with the Mills Act program. As part of the annual self-reporting, the property owner will be asked to submit the following to staff: Copies of invoices and receipts for all work completed (materials, labor, etc.); A list of any additional work completed on the property since initiation of the contract, that may not have been included on the Rehabilitation Plan; An updated Rehabilitation Plan indicating items completed with dates to indicate if completion is ahead or behind schedule; Photographic documentation of any completed or in-progress work. 64/11/2024 CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION Page 12 of 33 Contract – 10-YR Rehabilitation/Restoration Plan Eligible Improvements & Maintenance Items •Eligible work currently includes “any necessary repair, maintenance, restoration, or rehabilitation of a Historic property” •Previously approved Plans have included: ◦New appliances (washer & Dryer, refrigerator) ◦Drapes and curtains ◦HOA fees 74/11/2024 CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION Riverside County Appraiser Interior items such as drapes, appliances, paint,etc don’t significantly impact valuation. Valuation only impacted if it’s more of a construction level project. If it’s interior, it can’t be items that are easily replaced Page 13 of 33 Consideration – Eligible Improvements 1.Staff seeking Council’s input on updating Appendix A of Guidelines to have clearer eligible improvements in the work plan •CRPC recommended approval of the updated guidelines on January 24, 2024 •Updated Appendix A categorizes improvements as either contributing to “Structure Integrity”, “Architectural/Historical Integrity” or Ineligible •Additional input received at the March CPRC meeting from an existing property owner/Mills Contract that there should be no changes - primarily interior improvements 84/11/2024 CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION Page 14 of 33 Appendix A 9 SCOPE OF WORK ELIGIBLE INELIGIBLE Structure Integrity Architectural and/or Historical Integrity Interior 1.New/repair appliances X 1.New/repair carpet X 1.New/repair countertops X 1.New/repair flooring X 1.Interior painting X 1.Changes to interior walls X 1.Carpentry restoration work (example: Windows, molding, framing)X Roofing 1.Patch/Repair Roof X 1.New Roof (different material)X 1.New roof (original material)X X 1.Altering Building Roof (ridge, dormers, gables, etc.)X 1.Repair roof framing X 1.Repair of eaves/overhangs X 1.Flashing/waterproofing X 1.Install rooftop photovoltaic system (Solar panels)X Windows/Doors/Awning/Shutters 1.Replace exterior doors and/or windows X 1.Alteration/creation of window or door opening X 1.Replacement/repair of shutters or awnings X 1.Install or remove shutters or awnings X SCOPE OF WORK ELIGIBLE INELIGIBLE Structure Integrity Architectural and/or Historical Integrity 1.Whole house exterior painting X 1.Touch up paint X 1.Re-stucco (like for like)X 1.Stucco repair (like for like)X 1.Repair, restore, or repaint masonry X 1.Cleaning of walls X 1.New/replacement wall cladding X Architectural Elements 1.Repair, remove, or alter existing patios, balconies, and/or chimneys X 1.Construct new patio, balcony, and/or chimney X 1.Construct new attached wall X 1.Repair or replace gutters and downspouts X 1.Repair existing architectural element X 1.Add new architectural element X Mechanical 1.New HVAC system(s)X 1.New venting or duct work X 1.New water heater X 1.New fans X 1.HVAC system maintenance/repair X Electrical 1.New electrical outlets, circuits, panels X 1.Whole house rewiring X 1.Electrical panel upgrade X 1.New service lines to detached structure X 1.Electric vehicle charger X 1.Battery storage or generator X 1.Security lighting and/or alarm system X 1.Exterior lighting fixtures X 1.Interior lighting fixtures X 4/11/2024 CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION Page 15 of 33 10 SCOPE OF WORK INELIGIBLE Structure Integrity Architectural and/or Historical Integrity 1.Whole house repiping X 1.New plumbing fixtures (sink, tub, shower, faucets)X 1.Plumbing repairs X 1.New service or supply lines X Fire Protection 1.Install fire sprinkler system X 1.Install smoke/CO2 alarms X Structural/Foundation 1.Foundation bolting, wall bracing, and related seismic work X1.New/repair foundation 1.Seismic retrofitting 1.Repair or reinforce wall/ceiling framing or bracing Drainage/Water Protection 1.Flashing X 1.New/repair Exterior Drains 1.Water damage repair (interior/exterior) 1.Re-grading of property for drainage purposes SCOPE OF WORK INELIGIBLE Structure Integrity Architectural and/or Historical Integrity Accessory Structures 1.New/repair of walls or fences X 1.Landscaping and hardscape X 1.ADU or JADU construction X 1.Install/remove/repair swimming pool X 1.Construct/repair/removal of original accessory structure X 1.Construct/repair/removal of non-original accessory structure X General Maintenance 1.HOA Fees X 1.Regular common area or landscaping fees X 1.Termite Treatment X 1.Mold remediation 1.Abestos remediation 1.Radon gas prevention/remediation 1.Lead-based paint removal 4/11/2024 CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION Page 16 of 33 Consideration – Value of Improvements 2.Whether the cost of the rehab/restoration and maintenance improvements proposed as part of the 10-year Plan should at a minimum equal the amount of annual tax savings for all new 10-year Contacts and renewals of 10-year Contracts. 114/11/2024 CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION Page 17 of 33 Next Steps 4/11/2024 Based on input received, Staff will prepare an action item for City Council consideration on April 25th CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION 12 Page 18 of 33 Mills Act Presentation Thursday, June 11 @ 3 :00 PM -Presentation points: Context and hi story of the Act as it applies to HOA (Dunlin One first HOA to be granted historic designation status) Specific histo ry of Dunlin One application and administration of reporting inclu ding the inclusion of the grounds and pools as well as the buildin gs. We have alwa ys carefully considered our Association's budget components w ith a view that amounts paid in dues, which would be qualified ex penditures under the Act if paid directly by the owners, are id entified and reported by them as part of their Mills Act annual rep ort -and have been quite conservative in those consideration s. NOTE -the pe rcentage of the annual dues paid by owners that have previous ly been identified as qualified expenditures is less than 25%> (in 2 022-2023 it was 23% ). One important consideration for owners within HOAs is the consideration of the amount of their dues that should be considered as qualifying expenditures. In that regard, we recommend th at any HOA that intends to report qualifying expenditures t o its members should periodically review the components of their budget with the city's representative and agree as to w hich components represent qualifying expenditures. Finally, due to the nature of the items covered by an Association's Reserves, it is intuitively evident that much of the funding for Reserves sho uld qualify under the Act. What is the best course of action to obta in concurrence on that view? Page 19 of 33 July 16, 2013 Mr . Bernard Cain 1401 Wewatta Street #811 Denver, Colorado 80 202 •'t' 73-5 I O FRED WA RING DRIVE P A L M D ESERT, CALIFOR NIA 92 260-25 7 8 TEL : 7 60 346-061 I info@cityofpalmdesert.org Re: Sandpiper Condominiums Circles 11 & 12 -Landmark District Designation Dear Bernie, Congratulations on the Historic District designation of Sandpiper Condominium Circles 11 & 12. The plaques f or your Historic District designation are finished and a Covenant and Agreement and Declaration of Restrictions for Display and Maintenance of Historic Site Plaque Agreement will need to be completed and signed by the City and Sandpiper Condominiums Circles 11 & 12 to ensure that the plaques will be prominently displayed in perpetuity at the site . The Agreement and the Resolution will be recorded with the Riverside County Reco rder. The Agreement states that the property is a designated landmark and is subject to all applicable provisions of Title 29 . Thank you very much for your participation and for allowing City of Palm Desert to include your property as a Cultural Resources District. As soon as we receive the signed Agreement and the All-Purpose California Notary Acknowledgment, we can provide you with the pla ques . I have enclosed a stamped, self addressed envelope for the return of the docume nts . Please feel free to call me if you have any questions. Sincerely, ~(J Russell A. Grance , CBO Director of Building and Safety RG/sc Ends. cc: Gloria Sanchez , Records Technician , City of Palm Desert c, PIUl:TlOINitlCTCUOPJ.tu Page 20 of 33 August19,2013 Mr. Bernard Cain , Pre sident Dun li n One Homeowners Association 1401 Wewatta Street #811 Denver , Colorado 80202 Dear Mr. Cain : 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE PA LM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260-25 78 • TEL: 760 346-061 I info@ciryofpalmdesert.org Subject: Request for Approval of Historic District Designation for Sandpiper Condominiums Circles 11 & 12, Located on El Paseo, as a Local Historic District, Case No. CRPC 13-01 (Palm Springs Preservation Foundation, Applicant) At its regular meeting of May 23, 2013, the Palm Desert City Council, considered the subject request and to ok the following action: Waived further reading and adopted Resolution No. 2013-28 reaffirming t he action of th e Cultural Resources Preservation Committee, designating the Sandpiper Condominiums Circles 11 & 12, located on El Paseo, with Historic District Designation in accordance with Section 29.50.010 of the Palm Desert Mu nicipal Code . Enclosed for your records is a fully executed and recorded copy of the Covenant and Agreement and Declaration of Restrictions for Display and Maintenance of Historic Site Plaque. If you have an y questions or require any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact us. Sincerely, RACHELLE D. KLASSE N, MMC CITY CLERK RDK :glm Enclosure (as noted) cc /enc: Russell A. Grance, Director of Building & Safety o ,anmo oRilCHUD P,\PU Page 21 of 33 Page 22 of 33 Page 1 of 1 CITY OF PALM DESERT STAFF REPORT MEETING DATE: April 11, 2024 PREPARED BY: Richard D. Cannone, AICP, Development Services Director REQUEST: STUDY SESSION: UPDATE ON DINING DECK PROGRAM BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The purpose of this study session is to provide an update and seek Council input and feedback on the dining deck program based on City Council direction from the November 16, 2023 meeting that includes the creation of a new fee for the use of the right of way based on square footage. Legal Review: This report has been reviewed by the City Attorney’s office. ATTACHMENT: 1. Presentation Page 23 of 33 Page 24 of 33 DINING DECK UPDATE STUDY SESSION CITY COUNCIL JANUARY 11, 2024 Page 25 of 33 Background: City Council Direction (11/16/2024) Updated Temporary Outdoor Dining Deck Design Guidelines Went into effect January 1, 2024 Focus on Dining Decks within street, not sidewalk cafes Extended Temporary Outdoor Dining Deck Program to June 30, 2026 New Temporary Use Permit (TUP), Guidelines, & Revocable License to be effective July 1, 2024 Annual application thereafter Directed staff to research an annual fee based on a square feet and return at a future meeting No longer part of an emergency order Level of fairness 04/11/2024 CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION 2 Page 26 of 33 Existing Dining Decks w/in ROW – 8 TUPs Location/Restaurant Approx SF El Paseo (7) Armando's Bar and Grill 889 SF Daily Grill 254 SF Kitchen 86 635 SF Mamma Gina 554 SF Piero's PizzaVino 318 SF Sweet Basil 597 SF The Fix 856 SF HWY 111 Frontage Roads (1) Little Bar 428 SF 04/11/2024 CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION 3 Page 27 of 33 Update/Considerations – Within El Paseo  Dining Decks located within El Paseo – 7 Temporary Use Permits (TUP) o TUPs expire June 30th o New TUP application/guidelines required  El Paseo paving project starting June/July to October 2024 o Dining Decks must be removed no later than June 30th  Week of April 15th - Staff will be delivering a notice the to TUP holders informing them that dining decks must be removed for the paving project & steps to needed to apply under the new TUP guidelines. o New Dining Decks may be placed within ROW October/November 2024  El Paseo Merchants Association - Staff attending the April 18th meeting to provide update and answer questions. 04/11/2024 CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION 4 Page 28 of 33 Exclusive Use Fee Methodology Area Avg Asking Rate SF/YR*Avg Market Rate SF/YR* El Paseo (Portola to Hwy 74)$ 39.65 SF $ 34.82 SF San Pablo (Roundabout to Hwy 111)-$ 23.50 SF Highway 111 Frontage Roads (Portola to Monterey) $ 28.73 SF $ 26.62 SF Blended Avg Market Rate $ 28.31 SF 04/11/2024 CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION 5 *Source: CoStar Page 29 of 33 Consideration/Options – Market Rate Annual Fee Location/Restaurant Approx SF Annual Fee Annual Fee Blended Avg Annual Fee 50% Reduction* El Paseo $ 34.82 SF/YR $ 28.31 SF/YR $ 17.41 SF/YR Armando's Bar and Grill 889 SF $ 30,955 $ 25,168 $ 15,922 Daily Grill 254 SF $ 8,844 $ 7,191 $ 4,422 Kitchen 86 635 SF $ 22,111 $ 17,977 $ 11,055 Mamma Gina 554 SF $ 19,290 $ 15,684 $ 9,654 Piero's PizzaVino 318 SF $ 11,073 $ 9,003 $ 5,536 Sweet Basil 597 SF $ 20,788 $ 16,901 $ 10,394 The Fix 856 SF $ 29,806 $ 24,233 $ 14,903 HWY 111 Frontage Road $ 26.62 SF/YR $ 28.31 SF/YR $ 13.31 SF/YR Little Bar 428 SF $ 11,393 $ 12,177 $ 5,697 *Reduction based on seasonal peak 04/11/2024 CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION 6 Page 30 of 33 Consideration/Options – Max Size of Area Under current guidelines, no maximum size established. Three options to consider: 1.Up to 2 parking spaces or 352 SF [(8’x22’)x2] 2.Limited to Frontage of Business Option to encroach into ½ of frontage of one neighboring business with their approval. 3.No limitation 04/11/2024 CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION 7 Page 31 of 33 Update: Dining Decks w/in On-Site Private Parking Lots 04/11/2024 After June 30, 2024, must be permitted through a Conditional Use Permit ◦One application under review (Wildest Restaurant) CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION 8 Page 32 of 33 Staff Recommendation Exclusive Use License Fee: Effective July 1, 2024, and prior to issuance of the TUP  Applicant pay an annual fee based on the Blended Market Rate of $28.31 SF 04/11/2024 CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION 9 Maximum Size of Dining Deck: Limited to the Business Frontage Option to encroach into ½ of frontage of one neighboring business with their approval Page 33 of 33