HomeMy WebLinkAboutPublic Safety Commission Motorcycle Program Memorandum
u City of Palm Desert
•
1. b ! .„/Ay'h : Department of Community Affairs
04'•�
Zic 3c.
. ••.
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Sheila R. Gilligan,Assistant City Manager
Subject: Recommendation From Public Safety Commission Relative To A Motorcycle
Program
Date: February 22,2001
Recommendation: By Minute Motion, concur with the recommendation of the Public Safety
Commission and direct staff to implement the program as presented.
Discussion:
The Public Safety Commission has been reviewing the subject program for the past two months. At
its January meeting,members raised various questions which required further research and response.
The questions dealt with officer safety,public perception, funding, and program statistics in other
cities. Lt.Thetford presented the attached report which not only outlines the program but responds
specifically to the Commission's questions. The Commission voted 4 to 1 to recommend to the City
Council that it implement this program. Chairman Hagthrop voted no. While agreeing in concept
to using Cal Cops money, it did not take a position on how the Council should fund the program.
Four of the Commissioners were convinced that this program would be a valuable tool in enhancing
the City's overall traffic program. While some had expressed reluctance during the January meeting,
their concerns were alleviated with Lt. Thetford's responses to the safety issues and the program
statistics. Chairman Hagthrop cast the only dissenting vote in that he still had concerns relative to
safety issues.
Lt.Thetford's report is very thorough. He will be present at the meeting to respond to any questions
the Mayor and Council may have.
Pr ed B : Reviewed and Concur:
SHEILA R. G LIGAN C OS L. RTEGA
Assistant City Manage ty Clerk t anager
*Approved program, as CITY COUNCIL �cCTION:
presented, on a one-year APPROVED V DENIED
basis with BMW motorcycles. RECEIVED OTHER
MEETING DATE
NOES.
VAP ni •d/Iv�? � �. a � I VA A MO
ABSENT: l' �
ABSTAIN. 4A ANt.R-1
VERIFIED BY: A, .4 sb
Original on File with Ciey jerk's Office
T, Memorandum
cz* -'= r '4' City of Palm Desert
9,o E-.13. J 4P
°���-—y�`�° Department of Community Affairs
I To: Public Safety Commission
From: Sheila R. Gilligan, Assistant City Manager
Subject: Motorcycle Enforcement Proposal
Date: February 14, 2001
Attached is Lt. Thetford's report and update relative to the proposed motorcycle program. This
report includes the additional information requested by the Commission as well as responses to
questions asked at the last meeting.
Lt. Thetford and I made a presentation to both the Project Area 4 Committee and the Chamber of
Commerce Board of Directors. Both groups were unanimous in their support of this program,as an
additional way to tackle a major problem in the City—traffic.
d ' 1 Li -
,-
SHEILA R. LIGAN
Assistant City Manager
SRG:kr
Attachment
ITEM G
r
Larry D. Smith, Sheriff
RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
PALM DESERT POLICE DEPARTMENT
Motorcycle Enforcement
Proposal / Recommendation
City of Palm Desert
February 6, 2001
�1 , ig4
Riverside County Sheriff's Department
ii,_-..
,'? PALM DESERT STATION
.siAtir,
,_
r
ti ,.<' r, Memorandum
y
Larry D. Smith, Sheriff
TO: Captain McManus Date: February 6, 2001
FROM: Lieutenant Colleen Walker&Lieutenant Steve Thetford
RE: Motorcycle Enforcement Program- City of Palm Desert
INTRODUCTION:
On 9-20-00, Lieutenant Walker, attended the monthly meeting of the Palm Desert Public Safety
Commission. On 12-20-00, Lieutenant Thetford, attended the monthly meeting of the Palm Desert Public
Safety Commission. During both meetings Assistant City Manager Sheila Gilligan asked us to provide a
discussion paper on a two-officer motorcycle enforcement program for the city of Palm Desert.
BACKGROUND:
Issues of speed and traffic signal violations are of on-going concern to the members of the City Council and the
residents of Palm Desert. The current Sheriff's contract with the City of Palm Desert supports two traffic
sergeants and ten traffic officers.
If the City is concerned with speed issues,the motorcycle has proven to be an effective tool in addressing those
violations. If the City is concerned with persons running red lights, the motorcycle MAY be a more flexible
and effective tool than the standard patrol unit. However, for courtroom purposes the motorcycle officer is
held to the same burden of proof as the traditional patrol deputy.
Positive Issues:
1. Motorcycle units are extremely efficient at increased mobility in congested traffic and are able to reach
locations faster than a motor vehicle in similar conditions.
2. They are smaller and less noticeable than a patrol unit, giving them increased enforcement capabilities to
witness more vehicle code violations.
3. They have a traffic issue related deterrent effect in the eyes of the motorist who is aware of their
presence/use.
4. They are very effective for speed enforcement on multi-lane roadways and restricted (HOV-commuter)
lanes.
5. They are effective at target zones through repetitive enforcement actions. The public ultimately associates
certain zones/areas with the probability of seeing the motors working that zone/area.
1
6. They are effective in obtaining voluntary compliance to vehicle codes by the motoring public by virtue of
the public's concern that they won't see the motor unit in time to correct their non-compliance with the
vehicle code.
7. There is an initial increase in revenue generated through citations.
Negative Issues:
1. Injuries to motor officers are generally more significant than injuries to other officers in similar types of
accidents.
2. Motor Units create a potential"Gestapo" image in some of the public's eye.
3. Motor Units create an"aggressive enforcement" image that often receives negative press coverage.
4. Motor Units create a"laying in wait to issue citations" image.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Orange Police Department's Motorcycle Enforcement Proposal (Attachment "A") provides current cost
estimates and descriptions of the three most common Police Service Motorcycles. The following figures are
the cost estimates for two police motorcycles and two motorcycle officers:
Motorcycles:
Initial Cost Estimates: BMW Harley Davidson Kawasaki
Motorcycles RI 100 RT-P Road King KZ 1100 10-P
Purchase price per motor: $15,990.00 $16,265.00 $10,753.58
Total estimated cost
of two motorcycles: $31,980.00 $32,530.00 $21,507.16
Buy Back: . $8,954.00 after 3 years $6,250.00 after 4 years N/A
Subtotal per motorcycle
After Buy Back: $7,036.00 $10,015.00 $10,753.58
The Palm Desert Police Department would also suggest the use of the Kawasaki 1100 10-P motorcycle or the
BMW Rl 100 RT-P due to the fact that these models are proven reliable and are used exclusively within the
Riverside County Sheriffs Department. However our preference would be the BMW for the following
reasons.The BMW offers a buy back and maintenance program. The BMW motorcycle has a front disk anti-
lock braking system. Front brake lock up, during emergency braking, is one of the leading causes of motor
officer crashes. The California Highway Patrol is currently switching to using the BMW for this reason;
therefore, we would also recommend the BMW for its additional officer safety feature.
2
Decals/City Logo $250.00
ldditional expenditures for two motorcycle officers:
Motorcycle boots: $ 262.50 x 2 = $ 525.00
Motorcycle jacket (heavy): $ 257.25 x 2 = $ 514.50
Motorcycle jacket (light): $ 122.70 x 2 = $ 245.40
Motorcycle pants (2 each): $ 251.90 x 4 = $ 1007.60
Rain Suit: $ 50.00 x 2 = $ 100.00
Motorcycle helmet: $ 335.00 x 2 = $ 670.00
Motorcycle radio &accessories: $ 4,100.00 x 2 = $ 8,200.00 (Included with Kawasaki only*)
Motorcycle radio installation: $ 750.00 x 2 = $ 1,500.00
Mounted Radar&Handheld Lidar $ 5359.00 x 2 = $10,718.00
Estimated total: $ 23,480.50
Projected Personnel Cost Estimate:
Option 1:
Cost of two additional Deputy Sheriff's at Dedicated Fully Supported Rate:
$62.96 per hour x 2080 hours per year= $130,956.00 x 2 = $261,913.60
Plus Incentive pay: $ .55 per hour x 2080 hours per year= $1,144.00 x 2 =$2,288.00
Estimated total Personnel cost Option 1: $264,201.60
Option 2:
Use of two existing Palm Desert Traffic Team, Dedicated Fully Supported, positions:
Incentive pay: $ .55 per hour x 2080 hours per year= $1,144.00 x 2 = $2,288.00
Estimated total Personnel cost Option 2: $2,288.00
Cost summary and recommendation:
It is the Palm Desert Police Department's position that if the City were to implement the proposed Motorcycle
Enforcement Program that they move forward with Personnel cost option 2, utilizing existing Traffic Team
personnel positions. Given this recommendation the final total cost of implementing this program is as follows:
Motorcycle x 2 $ 31,980.00
Decals/City Logo $ 250.00
Additional expenditures $ 23,480.50
Personnel Cost Est. option 2 $ 2,288.00
Estimated Total Cost $ 57,998.50
3
MOTOR PROGRAM STATISTICS:
The Palm Desert Public Safety Commission requested statistics regarding the effectiveness of a Motorcycle
Enforcement Program, therefore I have attached the Rancho Mirage Police Department's Final Report
(attachment B) to the Office of Traffic Safety for the Commission's review. This final report reviews the
enforcement impact that the Rancho Mirage Police Motorcycle Program had during its initial project review
period(April 1, 1997 to March 31, 1998). The report reveals that during this review period there was a 24%
reduction in fatal and injury traffic collisions, seatbelt compliance went from 78.4%to 92.3% (an increase in
compliance of 13.9%), child safety seat compliance went from 80%to 91.8% (an increase in compliance of
11.8%), and there was a 90% increase in the number of DUI arrests during the review period.
The Palm Desert Public Safety Commission also requested a survey regarding the number of motorcycle
officers injured on duty. The following motorcycle programs were reviewed in response to this request;
Rancho Mirage Police (2 motors), Temecula Police (5 motors), Palm Springs Police(5 motors)and the Los
Angeles Police Department(286 motors). The Rancho Mirage Police,Temecula Police and the Palm Springs
Police have not had a motor officer injured in the last five(5)years. The Los Angeles Police Department had
59 officers involved in collisions during the year 2000 (0 - fatal, 3 - major injury, 23 - visible injury, 12 —
complaint of pain, and 21 non-injury). The Palm Desert Police Department respects the Commission's
concern for officer safety,however,the statistics show that motorcycle patrol in the Coachella Valley has been
an effective and useful tool with no injuries reported by the above mentioned valley agencies for the past five
years.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS:
The Palm Desert Police Department is charged with responding to traffic problems within the city. Motorcycle
enforcement would be a very valuable tool for the traffic team to utilize to help address the problems of speed
and red light violations. It is the Palm Desert Police Department's strong recommendation that the City
chooses to implement such a program. As a result of implementing the program,the City can expect an initial
increase in citations, and a subsequent increase in revenue. Deployment of motor units will have a deterrent
effect, and increase voluntary compliance by most motorists. Increased voluntary compliance to specific
vehicle code sections MAY result in a lower accident rate.
SUGGESTED REVENUE SOURCE
The City of Palm Desert has received $100,046.63 in Cal Cops money this year, which must be spent on
positions, technology, and equipment related to law enforcement. It is the Palm Desert Police Department's
recommendation that the total cost of this proposed Motorcycle Enforcement Program be paid out of these
funds,thereby enabling the traffic team to take a more pro-active approach to the traffic issues while having no
significant impact on the cities budget.
4
, A r A 0 01 ENT 41
,_.
_..; % % V.1._
0.1?
r+ 0�.� •t�`� •�+Z
r •
- ""lci...-r k *Al. :'11
..:: (S, ....# fel.;4'701 i 1.. '.-.' 444 2 ..:fni•i
r • . r.„,„ , ..,..„,., ‘,.., .
. ,.7
C...) „, ,:-,. . • ‘... •\--'1 ..
;.. 181
::::--srs,"..,11-4 -, . -,
t * • ..
• ` L I
.r
�� tom• `'L?�' 4'• i ;
•
•
N% 0 121
dd'' r
ORANGE POLICE CE DEPARTMENT
•
ENFORCEMENT MOTORCYCLE
PROPOSAL / RECOMMENDATION
for the 1999 /2000 Fiscal Year
Prepared by
c.4
Officer Brian Marcctte #1913 Completed September 1998
Traffic Unit
I
rAB�E of coNrENrs
I. Introduction.....
II. Background......
III. Findings..........
.......................................................................... 5
IV. The Kawasaki KZ1000 10-P................••••""""""
V. The BMW R1100 RT-P...•••••••••••••••..
RoadKin ................ 11-13
VI. The Harley-Davidson g••••••••••""
........
VII. Cost Break Down............................. 4
VIII. Initial Price and Cost Per Mile Comparison................ 14-16
IX. Conclusion...
X. Recommendation..................
...................................
...........
XI. Facts and Figures............................................................
XII. Performance Evaluation................................................ 27-30
..............................
31-36
XII. Pictorials..................
XIII. Equipment Suppliers..................
XIV. Article..........................................................
0-42
•
C
4
INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this report is to provide the Department with a r s recommendation
ement
for the efficient and cost effective procurement of the Department
motorcycle fleet.
Three manufacturers:
BMW, Harley-Davidson and Kawasaki,
ifie currently
lybi produce
motorcycles equipped for law enforcementith a wide price difference between needs
Department's motorcycle contrac Department's motorcycle manufacturers, it is clearly time to dXsafety mine the Dep
relative to cost, utility, longevity
This study will includ
e the evaluation of the new BMW 1i 0 RT-P, she Harley-
culated
Davidson Road King, and the Kawasaki KZ 1000 preVulcan 'Nomad' 1500 replacement). Utilization of performance data, cost figures and price information was obtained from the California Highway Patrol, the
of Orange
e Newport Beach and Escondido Police Departments,
Department Traffic
Irvin Orange
Maintenance Yard and evaluations by
Officers.
•
BACKGROUND
significantT advances in the technologicldevelopment
rogram at the
capacity
haveo been inception of themotorcycle
capacity e the Some
me as e the u h analysis v the
time has elapsed since the last thorough study of available
Department. Some timwhich includes ao those motorcycles.
enforcement motorcycles. A study and safety
performance, operating costs, life-cycle,
o ments in the past year. The California
' ay
of
There have been several Bevel P ear study and evaluation/comparison
- and the Kawasaki KZ 1000. Secondly, Harley-Davidson
Patrol (CHP) has concluded their three y
KT-75 RT-P itself in the California law
the BMW
has expressed an interest in re-establishing
Police version of the Road King model.
enforcement o a introducingand slower 2001motorcyan
And finally,b the
Kawasaki
KZ 1000 is rumored to be discontinued
� ntinued by
replaced by the Vulcan 1500 model (a heavier, longs
10-P . The law enforcement versiono the this model
ls has
KZ1000 ) etcof le the resentent agency than P. a law enforcement yet to be released and tested by
study.
5 RT-P has been discontinued since the roved BMWpletion
the
Although the BMW beenK 7 replaced with the more powerful andP
CHP study, it has cle Study 1997, Second
R1100 RT-P (documented in the Enforcement Motorcycle
Annual Report).
•
FINDINGS
Department has utilized the Kawasaki KZ police model
The Orange Police De P ears in their motorcycle enforcement
motorcycle Althoughuely for over 20 y proven to be a reliable
work hits orse",
itsinc also
p
hrogram. this model has or improvements
1982.
has not seen any substantial changesa relatively out-dated, inefficient, unsafe
The KZ 1000 10-P lends itself to being vehicle
comparison of today's standards. Furthermore, with the public
motorcycle by regulations regarding
concern for the environment aand
vasakistricter
KZ S000 10-P requires a special la�v
emissions, the carbureted K arding safety, more
enforcement exemption, due to it's high emissions. Reg
specifically braking,
the Kawasaki has no anti-lock brake systemrie (ABS)
avoiding a and
is
subject to front and rear wheel lock
In the event this is an area of concern.
collision, under heavy braking conditions,
interest in Kawasaki to discontinue the KZ 000 10-P market.be
b
The apparent competitive and updated model related to bringing a more 1500 However, the proposed replacement is rumored to lack an
ABS system,which is an
industry standard automobiles and steadily becoming a standard on motorcycles as well.
•
f
THE KAWASA
KI
KZ
1000
10-P .
baseline comparison in this study
With the lack
of data and confirmation on the new Vulcan 1500as a
cmparereplacement, the KZm 10nce0 Psand costs. Kawasaki hasisaid a spt ecial producer
toe
h compare performance statisticsyearsr three and possibly the KZ 1000 10-P for the
the nxt ewo wer Vulcan Vulcan model.
basis after the release o
KZ 1000 10-P is the model currently n n use at othe ne Orange
nlimited
The Department.
is purchased with a of 998cc,
mil age war This motorcyclemotorcycle has four cylinders, a displacement
mileage warranty. This 2 . It has a dry weight of 595 Pounds,
0 , a fuel
capacity
andof four a power output ofdi 92 Bhp. and an alternator output
of gallons (including reserve) lacks a water or oil cooling
single battery powersource. This motorcyclehaVe a catalytic converter to meet life emission
of standards.component and does not Departmental
per unit, before retirement and being sold at auction.
The Kawasaki asoui KZ 1000 10 - has a current ep average return
miles he or about three years, s an approximate
At this time, a used Police KZ 1000 10-P bring
of $1000 at auction
fleetof Kawasaki motorcycles are serviced""in
p house"dad by with
an
T
ve Department's
averager
operatingcost of 0.42 cents per mile, data which
waCity Maintenance Yard. the CHP, is
The performa
nce of the Kawasaki KZ 1000 10-P, as established by
1 as follows:
KAWASAKI KZ 1000 10-P
1/4 mile standin• start. Minimum 85 MPH/15 sec.
Combined ave
rase of a total of four runs: 96 MPH / 13.11 sec.
1/2 mile standing start. Minimum 90 MPH.
Combi
ned averase of a total of four runs: 103.75 MPH
Maximum s eed no less than 100 MPH.
H
Combined averase of a total of four runs
:
107.25 MP •
• Braking test. Four sto s from 70 MPH. 72 FPS ,er sec. re uired.
28 fps; 28 f.s I TR #2 28 f•s; 27 f•s; 24 fps., 25 f•s
TR #1 24 fps; 22 fps,
aki KZ 1000 motorcycle met all performance standards
Comments: The Kawas established by the CHP.
_ as identified in the CHP
ki KZ 100 010P,
One major disadvantage to the Kawasa stem. This braking system has
study, is the absence of an anti-lock braking s y
e stopping distances, and thus reduce the likelihood of
been proven to decreas
e
an impendi
ng collision.
cle,
There are several other concerns regarding
the Kawasaki motorcy
substantiated by Orange Police Officer evaluations and maintenance tint kn records.
Among these concerns is the inherent
rating offuelem of l has not eliminated this
increase in the quality and octane
m. Pre-ignition knock seems to be a characteristic of the Kawasaki
proble g
motorcycle.
is seemingly plagued with oil if a l . All DMepartment
roil tment
The Kawasaki motorcyclehad some type ° (As stated in
ks
Motor Officers have reported to having
require more than one servicing to identify and correct the problem
lto s made
the CHP evaluation, one officer believed that for the majority of the oil leak). This
from'lower quality materials, which accounts is an added Departmental expense after the one year warranty expires on the
and requires a fair amount of own time to rectifythe
Kawasaki motorcyclel
proble
approximately
. Our fleet of s durian 1 .motorcycles of these services required complete
approximately 18 times duringdown
"top-end" overhaul, resulting in additionaacosts ell as cost ost figures,es, were not
maintenance intervals and descriptions' proposal to further elaborate.
provided by the City Yard at the time of this prop on the
The Kawasaki KZ 1000 10-P ate also noted by officers to be fatiguing
ks. This may be attributed to the excessive
vibratat. ion
f the
s claim
riders lower b�c spring or shock mount in
motorcycle and the lack of a sp 9 periods of time on
they have experienced chronic back fatigue over extended
this motorcycle.
ery system, with a sloestw oandard
20T
0e amp alternator.
to 1000 10-P utilizesoMotor Officers have reported very the course of
r
alternator. Several of equipment during
"dead" batteries following the use of emergency
Additionally, the motorcycle's stator (alternator) unit, had to be
a single shift. Ad again, this service requires the
replaced on several of o replace the unit and necesary down time to service the
additional expense to
• motorcycle.
f
f
"wobbling" 'onto
sensate
a
Officers have experienced • high onsp to
the reare, seven l our Motor while in pursuit situations requiring 9
the wheel of the motorcycle, ed
Officers as a "high speed wobble".
turns. This sensation has been labeled by inherent problem with
Kawasaki has stated that this "wobble" sensation
snot to manufacturer specifications.
the motorcycle, but can exist if tire pressure Officers continue to
specified levels, Department a deceleration in
Even with tire pressure at turns,
report a "wobble" sensation in high speedwhich required
order for the rider to maintain control. sod overall
positivequalities of the Kawasaki KZ 1000 after market0-P include:
d
Some "rocket sprocket",p o the
acceleration, especially with the installation ofan
performanceyear to year, and the fact that overall e comfort of
consistentorccseemsOfficers also enjoy
motorcycle to improve with time.
footboards.
KAWASAKI KZ 1000 10
43
•
WEAKNESSES
Extensive xtensive oil leaks
Good overall acceleration Hish s eeo "wobble" •roblems
Rides like •ast models
Sin•le batte , low .ower outsut
Im•roves with servicin•Has footboards for comfort poor seatin ppwhich causes fate•ue
No anti-lock brakes
No oil cooler
No catal is converter
1000 10-P has proven to be a reliable dikco horse"
for
popolice
The Kawasaki KZ However, with the slatedroved
f this
departments around the country.a the KZ 1000 10-P engine with an imp
model, Kawasaki plans to rep 'Harley-Davidson' look-a-like styling. This
1500 V-Twin engine design and a 'Harley-
still has yet to be evaluated and tested under the
demands i to slower,
engine is
enforcenment use . The Vulcan s vel than t stearlier predecessor.
longer, heavier and more expensive
t
it lacks
brings this updated model to the market,
operation.
Moreover, even which Kawasaki 9 day-to-day safe enforcement
ABS feature, is paramount during Y-
THE BMW 1100 RT-e
an approximate two week trial use of a BMW
R1100In
early October 1e m I arranged BMW of North America. All
innine
of our
the
motorcycle, throughevaluation
rce.
Moto RT-P police moto y
in both city and
Motor Officers rode and evaluated thnforcementl and commuting ity
response to calls for service, traffic very impressed with the motorcycle's
freeway traffic. Officers were generally acceleration, stability, handling, and maneuverability. Above all else, Officers
system.
commended its anti-lock brakingyear unlimited mileage warranty.
with a displacement of 1085cc, and a power output of
T
The BMW R1100 vo cylinders,
comes
spa d sp threee 6 8 gallons
0is model has fi cyl� power(includingurge).
90 Bhp. It has a dry weight of 573 Ibs, e capacity ual battery
output of 50 Ampsprovidingso a
reserve) and an alternator position adjustable seat,
The BMW R1100 RT-P also offers a three P II opposed fivin-cylinder
riding position for a variety of riders. Thison Y t rcycle has an
omfertable r g
efficient 1100cc fuel injected liquid/air cooled horizontally
er� The BMW R1100 RT-P is
"boxer-type" engine with four valves peroctant safety feature. CHP
equipped with an anti-lock braking system, an imp
document several instances in which collision
CHP noncluded that due
evaluationsidance was
system.attributed directly to the anti-lock braking airs, and down-time are anticipated to
to its advanced design: maintenance, rep
be substantially less than
that of the current carbureted, chain-driven, air cooled
Kawasaki KZ 1000 10-P.
• •
0 RT-P has a recommended service interval of the KawasakiO0m miles,
1000
The BMW R110for Kus1ai00d
exceeding the present 2000 mile maintenance interval battery
10-P. The BMW offers the additional feature �� auxiliary 100 RT-P is the only or
emergency light operation. Additionally, which
with a three stage catalytic converter,toward a cleaner
enforcementdCa motorcycleitself exceeds California emission standards attributing
environment.
The BMW R1100 RT-P has a potential life-cycle of 100,000 miles, based on the
of$15,990 per unit.
civilian owned models, and has a price
The CHP also conducted a performance evaluation on the BMW R1100 RT-P,
which are as follows:
gMW R1100 RT-P
1/4 mile standin- start. Minimum 85 MtFH/15 sec. 13 9 sec.
Combined average of a total of four runs:
97.5 MPH 1
1/2 mile standing start. Minimum 90 MPH.
Combined average of a total of four runs:
108.5 MPH
Maximum s eed no less than 100 MPH. 5 MPH
Combined average of a total of four runs:
114
Braking
test. Four stops from 70 MPH. 22 FPS er sec. re uired.
PASSED
l
Comments: The BMW R1100 RT-P motorcycle met or exc performance
performance standards established by the CHP. For complete
see attached CHP evaluation first and second report.
data,
CHP noted several areas of concern f with the eB the
MW
As 1 December 19 e the pegs instead
R1100 RT-P. These included the use nd footer gders complained of feeling
side kick stand was difficult to deploy and
"cramped" while riding this motorcycle.
r f
BMW R1100 RT-P
WEAKNESSES
STRENGTHS Foot sees
ABS brakes Initial cost
Sus•e Side stand difficult to de•lo
. nsion Awkward seatin• for lar•er riders
Sus•e
. design
Front cr
ash bar and fainn
Low speed performance
Hot weather performance
Heated ha
nd •rips
Air current blocking
Quietness
Windshield design
Lack of fuel knock
Exceeds emission standards
Adjustable seating
•
While the BMW R1100 RT-P is fairly new for American law R1100 enforcement
use,
the BMW motorcycle is prevalent in all of Europe. The BMW engineering, advanced safety
s and superior maintenance / serviceability
eng
motorcycle utilizes an light weighted design andperformance, and standard
features, the use of weight alloys, superior pert
intervals. The BMW's modern design, far
safety features mak
e it a very popular choice within the worldwide market today.
THE RAREFY D AVIDSON ROAD KINGIn
D anvi attempt to return to the California police motorcycle
market,to Harley-
Davidson •
Davidson has made recent, but incremental, improvements
with a belt-drive system, that
The company has replaced the chain-drive systemrequirements. Harley-
has improved reliability and decreased
t on to its line of motorcycles, which
nance Davidson also recently introduced fuel injec and reliability.
has enhanced performance, operation,
f
f
and
Shawn Travis arranged for a two week
i trialn Traffic
Iv October of 1997, OfficerMost of the officers
evaluation the Harley-Dade and evaluateson g his motorcycle.
Unit had an opportunity to ride
The Road King is a 1340cc fuel-injected V-twin cylinder,
belt-driven motorcycle.
statistics, both the BMW and the Kawasaki
Based upon the listed performance performanceal areas, including
acceleration,
outperformed the Harley-Davidson ine responsiveness, and maneuverability.
bilit. Unliken
speed handling, resp
the BMW,ation, high cle was noted to
-Davidson does not offer advanced safety
the Harley the motorcycle the our test period,
m. During
as
system. odometer.
the ABS braking Y 3000 miles on the
have a slight oil leak with only
The performance data as complied by the CHP for
the Harley-Davidson Road
King is as follows:
Harle Davidson Road Kin
1/4 mile standin- start. Minimum 85 MPH/15 sec.
Combined averase of a total of four runs: 88.5 / 14.11 sec.
1/2 mile standin- start. Minimum 90 MPH.
Combined averase of a total of four runs: 96.75 MPH
Maximum s.eed no less than 100 MPH.
Combined averase of a total of four runs: 100.75 MPH
•
Bra kin; test. Four sto s from 70 MPH. 22 FFS er sec. re.uired.
PASSED
Comments: The Harley-Davidson motorcycle failed the performance
standards as established by the CHP. For complete performance
data see attached CHP evaluation, first and second report.
•
The Harley-Davidson offers only satisfactory performance, upright police/patrol-
oriented
ics commodious side bags, adjustable vh� l/t e shifter, and a
son d King has
eayduty er dom The Harley p
havy side stand (no coenter stand). However, officers were
purchaseprice competitive to the BMW and e
tstanding resale
an initial. ceHarley-Davidson.
value. Officers were cagetondhmargial performance, handling, overall
generally critical of the motorcycle's
utility, reliability and durability.
Harley-Davidson Road King
•
WEAKNESSES
STRENGTHS Poor acceleration
• Initial cost
American made Oil leak/ mechanical •roblems
Front sus•ension No Anti-Lock brakin• s stem
Accommodatin• for lar•er riders N1ar•inal handlin•
Extremes lar•e side bass Outdated com•onents
Ad'ustable heel / toe shifter Substandard mirror desi•n
Footboards
Resale value
•
and evaluating process at our Department, only /
At the conclusion of the testing Davidson Road King gave it their
approval. This motorcycle does not appear to represent a progressive approach
to motorcycle design, nor did it meet the CHP's enforcement motorcycle
performance standards.
•
cI .
L./
COST BREAK DOWN
fi ures based on models with no radio
Data listed below are approximate9
equipment.
HARLEY-DAVIDSON
COSTS KAWASAKI KZ 1000 BMW R 1100 RT-P base $12,VIDS
$15,990.00 N/A
$7,951.000.42500.00
cents0.11 - 0.18 cents
e offered $8 954.00/ 3 rs. $6,250.00/ 4 rs.
MEM based on Kelly
Ilin
bu back None based on Kelly
a700-1,500 cash Blue Book Blue Book
return b auction
INITIAL PRICE
AND COST PER MILE
has an initial purchase price of? ,9 .00 (this BMW price
e be
The BMW R1100 RT-P package). The base priceManagement District
includes a full lighting5 .00d gsrant fromen the Air Quality
offset through a $5000.00 90 $10,990.00. The possibility of this grant is made
(AQMp), lowering the costdue to the BMW's
from AB 2766 funds (Emission Reduction Strategy)
availableBMW exceeds the California Emissions
1.8s Standardgrains of
• lower emission output.m r Thet per kilometer, opposed
1.4 grams per kilometer at 1.0 grams
per
and Harley-Davidson. The BMW 1 0 T P are
nter for the Kawasakitime is approximately
currently built to order, and as a result delivery
months from the time of order. BMW has a flexible
purchase Buy option. This Option
Option (straight lease)iated time for a pre-designated
includeb: a th motorcycleo back at a neg 000 BMW buyback
many(VIW buys theagencies negotiated an approximate $9,000.00
other have ash Program (Department buys the motorcycle
to the latests the munpubotorcycle
le cost
outright).
three Tears), and 1a 100 RT-P, according mile to operate.
o The BMW R1
comparative report, figures the BMW at 0.11 to 0.18 cents per
4. The Kawasaki KZ 1000 10-P has a pu•
rchase price of $7,951.00. This model has
the lowest purchase price of the three models listed. However, it also had the
f
period offered. The
lowest resale value and the least attractiveapproximate operatig cost of 0.42 cents per
Kawasaki s 1000 10-P hady ouranCity Maintenance Yard. This cost
is s 'Nomad'e of
mile, figures determined by
the motorcycles limited warranty period. The new Kawasakir0 osen buy back
speculated base price of $12,500.00. T fe ores are no
oth Kawasaki Vulcan
has a p mile9
programs offered by Kawasaki. Cost per
were not available at the time of this study.
Finally, the Harley-Davidson Road King $12,500.00. Lighting
has a base price of
are at an additional cost
and siren with the Stage I performance packageHarley-Davidson does offer a 12
the price to $16,265.00 per unit. Harley- way. This
bringingmotorcycle is not modified in any
month warranty plan, only if the nce modification by the dealer, which still
excludes
oes not the standard Stage I Pback
performance of the BMW and Kawasaki models.
does not compete with the pee value competitive buyprogram.
Harley-Davidson has a high resHarley-Dav'dson Road King were available at the
No cost per mile figures for the
time of this study.
•
PROJECTED LONG-TERM COST COMPARISONS
Kawasaki KZ1000 Motorc cle
951.00
•
Purchase Price......E..••••••ed with Emergency Lights / Siren
etc...)51
( quiPP
• 3 Year Cost of Operation..................................................
....................•••••••• • • provided by
This is based on maintenance records ps of operation of a
Escondido Police Department for 3 years
1994 Kawasaki with service intervals of 3,000 miles.
City Yard Labor Rate..................
.......................$48.00 / hour
• Re-Sale Value (Auctioned)................................................
..............••••"""'•• ,•$14,500.00
• Total Adjusted Cost of Operation....................
BMW R1100 RT-P Motors
.............
•
,,,,,,,,,..$15,990.0 0
edwith Emergency Lights I Siren
9tc...)
90.
PurchasePrice..............•••
•
(Equipped
.............54,800.00
3 Year Cost of Operation T l 'has a three year warranty, which
• covers all components of the motorcycle except normal
wear items. Kawasaki does not service intervals of 6,000 miles.
er a three year
warranty. The BMW haservice
Dealer Labor Rate (Iry Seaver BMW, orange , CA)..............
$60.00 I hour --
Year Period...........................S8,954.00
•
BMW Repurchases After 3 836.00
• Total Adjusted Cost of Operation..............••••"
Haile -Davidson Road Kin Motors de.
516,265.00
•
Purchase Price...... ........ed ,.,,,,,,,,.with Emergency Lights I Siren$1 w1 Stage I
(EquiPP
modification)
..............SX,XXX.XX
•
3 Year Cost of Operation.................The cost of operation figures were not available at the time
r
of this study due to the limited lae The Harley Davidson
fornia
agencies using the Harley-Davidson.
has service intervals of 2,500 miles.
y Harley-Davidson)............. .$56.001hour
Dealer Labor Rate (Orange count Y-
4 Year Period.......$6,250.00
• Harley-Davidson Repurchases After 0
• Total Adjusted Cost of Operation..................................5XX'
ear cost of operation comparison, there was a $3,528.00
Based on the three y
savings with the BMW over the Kawasaki.
lude the
* The proceeding cost figures do not include tax,applicable freight and/or handling charges.ted co Ns t does it inc Escondido
required radio equipment. The figures are based on a 1997 BMW R1100 RT-P
•
Police Department),a 1994 KZ 1000 10-P and a 1997 HD Road King.
t
CONCLUSION
In conclusion, this study has found that the anticipatedo Br a threcoe year projections
ojecti period are
sper unit. This is
an approximate S3,548.00 savings,
while providing for a higher level of safety, a,much
the more
comprehensive
Kawasaki nsivand
warranty, less maintenance and "down-time than
Harley-Davidson Y
motorc cles. The BMW R1100 RT-P was evaluated 199 by
oAllur but
Department in November of 1997, and again in May and August performance over the
three officers within the Traffic Unit favored the
ThBMvas based primarily upon its
'Kawasaki and Harley-Davidson motorcycle. and power.
anti-lock braking system, advanced engineering,
i- ock brakingsystem provides for a much safer and cknowledged
ble
The BMW's anti-lock
braking capacity. Auto manufacturers hn Department have
four wheel vehicles. All of the
the necessity of an anti-lock braking systemed with an anti-lock
s are
uipp
inherently Department's newly purchased patrol less stable vehicle, which would
braking system. Motorcycles are ang system. It is time to take advantage
benefit even more from an anti-lock bhasi�ze the same level of concern for the
of this critical safety feature, and emp
riders of two-wheel motorcycles.
stem which could significantly
The BMW also utilizes a high output charging system
contribute to both increased utility and increased have placed anemmense
nt
improvements in police emergency lighting systems
load on police motorcycle electrical systems. This load add decreases
failure eponent
reliability, life and also results in "no starts", premature
ectrical
s stem failure, and "down-time" in the Kawasaki KZ1000 i o-P The BMW's dual
battery and 50 amp electrical system stem eliminates this problem.
This
sign, with an
The BMW motorcycle utilizes a "Boxer" designe thisd en line. the der an addedengine cylinder on both sides of the motorcycle,
measure of safety to a riders feet and legs, in the event of a collision.
The CHP, Newport Beach and Escondido Police Departments cost nxpeatations and
the BMW 1100 RT-P meets or exceeds Departmentaltal of
performance/safety standards. In fact, the CHP has ordered ot Beach a a7 BMW
R1100 RT-P's as a result of their study and both the N p
Escondido Police Department took delivery on three.
THE
BMW R 1100 =`,T-P
MOM 81101019S
Recommendation
concurs with the CHP, Newport Beach and the BMW do Police RTP
This study that the but cost
Department findings. It shows
only prudent selection
respects to safety,
enforcement motorcycle is not
effective to our Department as well.
uncertaintyof the antiquated Kawasaki KZ 1000, the lack
a estandards and
Due to the theVulcan
replacement and the poor pert
of
pricing on Vulcan 1500 purchase the new
the Harley-Davidson, it is recommended th t the as each Kawasaki is retired
BMW R1100 RT-P motorcycle for a replacement
from the fleet.
and the lowest bid of initial purchase price, and consider
It is time to look beyond such factors as operating expense, maintenance/service costs, resale value,
y,
c
mb
nation
of
increased utilit and most importantly, safety features. is thisraot vei and cost
data which reflect actual costs, and make the BMW such
effect
ive tool for this Department.
•
f
it
••
,-,
D
•
•D. ....ri ...... ;
NI)1
•
4.04/•.A••• •!•,*.••., ,
!•
.., ...015.• ....."-""s ...,..... •.,..
...!....e., . ; . .
'•W...•::..."". '•• ..44. ..'. I.
. ...e......ti:VP•':. " ..• ..;:'•.C.::.:;!.!;;:.:
':r•A' .I. \/
Sc • .•;.''•:
4. .•'..::''''. .--•'-:-..... '41('....:;.'*.••• • "•66. . ' ' ,• ' •••+-rre.t.. /' \ .74.•, I,
... .•. , iiv , c..1,,,
.A•e• / • •.... I
....... I • al ?A ...". . ' • - ,. ', .40" - ,‘ • • .."..•7, ... :::.....1,,.•..". .
..,% ••• .1,`,.•••.4X 47 ,v=-.•. ''I':s"•;••:'.. .01;.41,3,,,'11,4!,12.:7174_4,17:7 4.4,-;'%i;•:.;":"!...1.1!).......g'1;•`.i.;'..s'...1•1•.‘••'...4.. ;':''.........".:.'f':'.........;••:.1:.il',• ,'.....'• s•.7.1. ''t'4,';.,,. Jet, z•...,, , . ,!.. . .::.:;•:,......::.. .•. : ..14..
..... u. e•:''' -0
. •••••..... / ; ,;:.;...03...orr.E.,:itlia%,..!..,., .... osil_27. .114'417'...,..,......*.•;• '.. ..,,,.• .. .. •,,, ;,. .•. . .
'C;.-.:.*,c. .1 •7:::%.1.,::::..i1J;;;•(S...2e191 IP' '.'". .I • ' I '.? ,"t..... , .! .. ' d., • ' . 111 1:-1: ...." 1 ..iit. ..1...:•' .:. ::'';:.i,..."..,.".''': i
, . . , 4Ir%I j.t..., •••?I . . , I. -,. ..• • 4f, .7.•,•,„,,,.•,.i if . • 1 ..otar•cl•f•P•..4.-.C.n
....1,,,..;:: :;.1* ;. • ,4•?,,..-_.\...r.L.F.,:•;;;;4,1•7....0.4•l'%' - . ''& , „, ,,, %. .i li “•:'oi..,''t .• . • .. I. 4• ''''.101,:',, VI, iti.1•;;AW • ...7e. , 'f,' qi/ - ' V.11.14 1•:‘•4•11'll :''lli•e":1•4.•
- .eak '- 1 , . C.(:'')A5.1.•:• ''...' .''.• • ef 41
•• • • All00._ ' 4 .--r.•;;;-7,,•:e•Fche..•,--.. •
tr.
•I ' i ' •'o''i i 4.•• '•• !••••' '; ••••••'41, .a..•••• ‘to * -'111%.,/ .".*i?• :','"'..! *.!•.i.°.• !
.:. .....,••••,• •".• 1,f.:1.,r4
.*•....". -r* riliti. 'A*:::,14."‘;!•••••'"•.:.-•!.....„••••," . ..,:epi:. . ., • • •' / .1....”*.:•.:i*';;' .. • :41•7414.44, 'ill's f' •-•‘..1r11. es .! "......... • ..1., , . ., ........:.•,..
. . .. .0..„ ,. re.. • . ...„=„3.,....... .... .:.... .... .....r ........ ...-4,101,.......0.1......./Z..i.vfotiir-r- ..,.....4 ilt. ,f,..?...;11.1,4.Irtfic• .. 1„Lit,..... : •Ve, ......* '""••••• .•- ' '' . •
it..
/.. ••. • ; .... ..;'..et''.
1.' . t• ..-...-- . ... ...,.•
. : .;1•„.-:,.4•• '$•.*:\•.'••Jii,.1 I S,D, .,,Liogyil•V;• r4/100?.. f'f.':•11.11,1,•.•,.1••..i.' .• .. .1 ., , . • . ...• ...
...\.•tz,w/P..'•••te'l.. 1‘v ................/C•••°"•••• no-i't:••''-'1.•••••.,••';•',..,...4.1.ft•,::4,414.1 votinfrpr•••'-,,,,, ;',,,,.t.viii,"?.‘c •...:,•,;•$•••••..:41:1 •,,,,*...e.
;:i;V.-. •• ••••.•••'',3;:.::*(t•1.Z.1,C'i• 1$!•VIV 1.. •40/... , ,
-41 iiti.6••••••••
*Dr, oft 111.. ." :.;!••,,U'r.'1. •••••I;/.1.. ...::-.......,:t••••••...n•:-..„.•..... .............,' -- . •..
•:-..ii:',...:•-e. 1•-:..pla , to!...';'•:!;•: • ••. .... ..."..'.'•-:. :: • •...:" ..I.'.
r la.
%. .1::;'•.'1••'•'• '....:?4%4..4-t.I.,;•) .• • ..31!' ,ed:• ,••••;" 71. ..•;1',-5)
••••• `......:...•• •4...z.r.... ::: . ..../ .... .............,..." ......,,......,,t...----<:::',491;% %.:„Ilk :•;:.....•...7..:-.., • . ....1.- .-:•. • . . .
'''"'t '''•;•.ciii:,.....:•,"';'.......:."...:•:......:•,:.,...',.!...',....:••••••,...`..2..,.. 44,4,:ii.),-.-4.-.z, .;;;,..rS,i,.......;••,,_.- ,,,..,,4., :::•••••...;..,, ,-- •• ....-1.-:-.r. :• • .. • • . • ...., • , •
i !).. .t....1., •,./:.,... .. . ,.. ..,. .... .•..... . ....., .•... ..,,,,... ............,wir,.,,,,,,,,...,..,,..!.,,.- ;;•.;i•V.A.:iv.... .....;4::•••,••••••••.,:,' •'•:.,..... '1•,' ' • . • • • . •• ' •. t••7
rd,•;;; .4..*...•••)°......!..'.'..'',......!.....4.......!......,*:./1.i......i'l.f.Q.:•''..•••'.4 ";;;;11•44%;',..1:••••i'le•I'''••:•••`iltAtf;h:rr•Pik... 1.•4"..0tA.?••''''':'•.(1..;"..... .. •.. • .. • ' •'':••..-•• •..'.. ',•!_:
••.• .g• ...,J, •,.,+•1,:it.:,•.,.ii'i •‘.•.;2.,;:..11•11. 7..t.ttl,z1.1.;11,.•.!..:1:1,.•'ke',441.44•11(.4;1!•;V,:P..4::*'..;•••••:';';'."...r. ... V•.. . .k.'''. • • • • • '• ••.. .. . .• ;"..4-•1
r:-.' 'N , ,•y,,,?...••.......r.•.. ..• • '••••:•••••1'.-N,'• I I.:. ' r;•.N.,; -,-•'.e',.....1',.•,•.,40.;••••k•i' • ... •'C...• •••••• •, 14., ' •.. • .
„
.%. ..• • • . .'..i.•i..*:.'•:?...f
.. .
s• s••. •••• •• .. ... ' ' ' 4,.... '. il, • • `, . • 4.. • It. - ,. , ••••• \ .04A
.:(,\': 0 -' , ,, •.0% •, .., ., ,a.., ,..i.,,,,••,... .. • , \ ......Nit.,., , ,•, :•.t,•,1•••... ••• • ••• ••• •
ii ••• ":......••••••'•I:4...b: '.. ' ':'''•.'.', '1) .9., , 4.1•••i'•11..,.••••'‘4•:••;:t.•'.• ..' •: 14.7."'''.•.1 SP
•. ;,,' ' •6.. ;r..„.. 1.:••,•!•!!',..,...•' .*.•"..:.:',:it,•••'0.•.•.',;,:•,;,...;.61.......1,1•1•;•. .N.,:: ...;.•;7•,. ,.;•• %,.' 0.:;:....:''• • .••%• '.'eil:;:'•'•O.L'••••'''''•••••'• •••'•••' •'.•! . •• •r ..I ?.1 4••••‘ .. • ..• • .. .• ••• . . Vii2••••:., . „;;;%•,..44.....',•,:':...'.. ..•'.. ...,;..i,..,„A•••••••••• •; ...:*.:.....",,..,:14:7)..k
. ' . ' ' , ',• ' ' ••• .... '1*"...e i'..e:''•:•," •:e,...P.A:Aiili.g.I.;•;:kkjFir,:•'•it.S.:"•••.,,!?:,•:,,';T:',•..%•:'.‘,..•4. 'X...;::.'f••••••..:i..1,4,i'••, a.,:.. . .•. , .. *•-7r " •: • ,,.........!..; :o '':.
.. .1
•...',.•',. .• ...?.•,„,,,,./.:03;•.1.!......1.••14,,L,.•..!::.,....7.1•„..J...11..0:s.',141.48.,..tx,t.,11 tig 1.,Ni, ..0•(401.,h...• ••.• .,.. , ,, ,...:......,1„•„,,....•4,„0.• . •... .•.•• • . •;.....,•.,...
• "'IV,' • ;!' ..:.; .• :• e 4 ;.,..1,•-'•-.• • . ...• '‘ • . •
..••
,... ::. •••*6 ,....,,,•-••t.!::. ••;:t•.;::e,i',51.4:41,Ift:.'Zig;:;;P'.;1•111,;.•:t7,\•_.".4:,!''i!•Xii!A...•'riSt1;',12;:zi! :!;.;'t 1.1. '.4Itt:•1.47'..;, e.:'.:•-•i-,...•-:.•••,.;••,'..•••.•;...),!iti .44tI.•;4 4 1 i'., .5 ••••• • I. ' '' • • " ' •''"' '0.
....,mikrjr..•.2•,:i.,r;t4--;;;;•:`;'•••,..••.. ,!.:••.ii alitai•14,',A1,;6?.'•,,••••,;,...fii".1:',•:.7.4'•••,,.,,,-i•!......%•:,„;;-,41:7',.:,i .INV, '.:0•:,;!...;•••••:.1;.'' :,.'••',;i''.'..:•• ...'....;•.i.,:f1;A:ci';4•••• ,...•.7..• • •:.• ...;....:.: •.. • •:""...t•r.:i
.• . ••• ...0. •I•V•14,-&-i•al•-il4•C°A.f't•,'"':•e-4:•••'17'"•:"'7'..';•'""•?1%,t "..41•$11.01111:11.1: "•';'+' ''..i11`' : ',••••,...',.t;:fi,,,•••••• !....:4',...,'..7....-.'•.4. • . ••;.t...le.vy.17 . • •..„ .•• ..•••.••: '.!.. :.*::-.-:....'....•:74••:1 •
.'' ••••••' '.---'14)''''''r't' ..-4.. ' q.•4'411j4.4'!, .',!':;1'4.2447fClit;411.41.4.1sil ':41P4:11**4. ••••44.,:tre:••!'::..?,4•Ii!......!'.'•( ..10e••••,.:t•?•,‘"v ..:•••••1'.".•'.,•-`'' ..4 . ' -,-.
'-';'•;"•'1.'"'; • ''"fli '•'-•;''iiii,t4!i. ::,:i.,t,:iri;1,e.:11:!;!'?‘•,4:ktiliii41, *'•iyi.:-`;'.'‘'•.•'.i,‘ ,*•.,,r,!:,•!;;Y:'..":.;:,.ii,.....;;;.';;•••••• '..c,:.-',...1.,,!i,•'.-i:"'''/ 7- -''''.•••.::;'..•• ;:• ....-:. •••• • -••....;7, . 4:••
,;•..•:-•....14::•.•
••:.1 ..i.•,.:•••11....tx14i:;;.41.,;.•;;;:..;:i4,••:tiv.t,-?..1•15...,•:15.!...1%„ •Ini,V1:1:;;;:„.'4:4!,..41eS./.,.=?Kptu.-11;:•••;,:-....4•'•2/...,;1:7...„...;
•" •;....*:.;.•:•,.,!. ...q2•••••.,.1••••i••••.24.1•••,:k.1.1,'1-'4..-.11,-•Air,.1:11rie.I.0,4,. ....t•If•Wit..ottw ip 40.;••,-/-.i,..r, ,,...---- Sit
1-%:.':... •:'''i 1:;;;* -,•:::••••• ;:;04,.i.1:451j:'147_,:'e 1:f7V4.4.••.‘,.,Jive il:i4„Ap•J, ,.i..,;;011,& ,.•.40.2„.1,,,' it:,,t•:.',,•••: 7'..••••• •?•!•'.'•:•.••:••••••' :,."?..•;'::f;.',.:::I.
...i.0,•:',..r:e,•;.•1 y,....r..1.4!,FA7,•!..:•:Z...:;;;•:.•,17, .44,7•BeAl /. .4-i..!;%•i71;.:4`45tiTe..tittio,.41,,:yll.1•1011i0prowf.,•1!1.Iltiiti.r.tle. yliii.:;,•,1.0, dref;.; :•.:....:•.;•;:..`...,,.'.;.i..•:.... :.•.:N.::.:,:i•;.:•;:..-...,'.:•::::.•:•:4;.j?i!.
'::•4••s'•r....•4.•:••••;h1jgel?rellIre.:r•t7a;i4:•••••••:r.;:.;.;;•‘;''';:.....4.1 ...;';.;i;14114a.:A':'";re.:g..;!;5/1,1•1?Iti4;t41100411e141 Vlitr.'4Atga4 jr/r / ..• ‘.4.(:.:4 i/4 kiti411,1•1:;;;';9ti.:. ..1":•:.i'.:•.7i....ik:.1.;i:•.1/;:i••;;.*•!;;:74,::.7::.4C41:.
• ....'...• ,;;4 •....1•,.‘1,......•...''.4:;-4•It.i.........1:,•...4.;:;.••.:7....::•;•.....„.•...;/!..4:44,6:11/{.reigiV,,t44,4144.dtlioictig ifil.D, 1 ii-,,,Iii • 1-•• ',,,,'"'iti,i.,:•' 1„,.1.•••' ,..•
-:.:,..:•,:, ! .. :i ...•.......•,:,...:.;',;..i...i:::•;;•1 e.••4:4:2/..,'"•:!:i••-:.74'.1.;;•'.1.'141,11'1'.itr.1114.f.r 141•1 itor,,, ,• k' ) ' ' .1 ; .,frik'.I' ,V. V /1. 1.-/11.10 i7i1:91L'ItfCi::•:/:;;;;,??,•:;;J:it7,0.41?::;:.'1.•.?..:!i•11.:1;•;.;; .'i.1.4 ::;•_,41t1:.1
i'e...e. '•.I. • ;f•P.' ::::•'.4'.7::,..•:;*•;v:1::•Cr••:•.",*;•• •.•:'e,'••%•Vii4:::%4134e1)11;e30.9 ' ' :. " i.'•'' ' ililh-•-ttAilt-',111.. li .1".;;/•.'17.4.4 •.4 1;•-":44•AtIV.r.:il. ei"..P41;:••":5•).`••••1:'•f i*:•:*.:N`.4••••:t.:.•A"17:41e"
•••:"•::',.%:,'; '- ;r.!..:..•.%::;'.*:•i:•441. •:•;74:'...4).1•Y't.•••••;4.1:i:te:!.Ailittt:>.°;1047.1;14111•T•'''';‘'.ZAY Vt4'67•:17•' Pt'•E."140.4b••/.1.'9,••(!..11..,1'11;r5::.'..•, 1.4:•'•• 04;.•,•.,s. 1",?.....-.. . .4:,,,,,,lx,,-;ttelp.:•41..•••,...11z,i-4,-;:l.:,:.:,!..-....k.:.,,,,i,•;•te...:•.t.:;.;,Nylte,•5•
.,...../0„
-,:-::.•. / -• :,.q.,...;,;;.:.;.;.,,„1•„$1,,, :41„,14. 1.4,)•....-...ct ,,;;;,,.....i.,;(1,,Ii...,...,,.,,,..:7!„,,,i,,f4.,..... .,;.:•,:f, ,..314„g,r...,1,4„,.- ,.., ..?,,it., 7..4:01,1/44,....kve.;•.04-•,14,44......,..:::va,..,;:e,14-.F.,_.•4::..1.,..-.4
•-•:.,..,,L.,....„.:;,,,.....::::,...-,;,....,f,:.52.,74;••re,„iza..,•,,,*,-...1.,,,, 4,14.•yg;. 0„,. ,,i,p;...•.f.....•!•..1.;.:ii,:•.!:!..;•;.:..,,!•4•;).!,•„,..;,••,i.:f:.....:•.t.,•;;Iv•.•••,tei ,4,4"e• 11• - "1,443.1.47i Nihi .•7..;;;4•10.:.(•:.e.,*.f:•'a••...:0•••;•••:.:••;#11.:Iii•:"..::44;:i T...
'0';i...f e.i.•'-',"_./4 4!:;:i,',,'; •r?9,.1:•••,yrilr1,49?..-;'I:lit.. •?'''''‘''.,.' :„:ri..I.e,i'f't• .4.' ;i SIJI.:••:f.t1.•;: •.;' iqi..111g1.1'$14!.',A'41'413::,lat:11•;.:r., v.„.,. ..,A•,,,,t... :1)&71 1.!%ft ....41T44,,,..PF io:; •,..!•,,..1.4*4: qa..14%sti
• ...•,,,,e,„••,,_••70•••,4•,.,:r.p,...: •apwr,,,, . al; .... • •,,,,,,,- ore e4 .e.,tr'ttvtpil':t:!.•::-:•:-'1.•7•-•',“-4)...!•1'.'41;;',4*r•pf.t..r.'411,,,!;iitkf,- ;:::-,,,,,,,•;•,•c,i.•;.••••y ;I:.0,„- $'7'"•,,,,.:;'. •:11'44,1,1;ii•'''• •'711•150,410,01-.01V;i.;44:2c1,:.:elf,A1.1..4.1!At'1111';
' ti.1.1...", .;.,..--.0,,Iliteir,:;,e.rti..t.••• t j. .4 .,i• {I 111:0!,A:.1:7,'...;.,.„rr,,;1:':. ..:.1.`.1.7.7 ...4..., r...,,.. T....f4,-... 1, I*to r,.oil,:;.,,,,,;....?,;,..„e...c...„,......p.i.,,i......,•4.......1,..
, .1,-•••' • ',. • •- ' c/sr-7, yi.9 - , 4,,.., 04...iybr.:•,, iiii.-rpf,- 4,•,;r4,--1-:::,--.-:•:-!--,:•••.1-,41!:.-,-/.4.,A.:,14-:‘.;;4•-q.-p.,-...!„,..qt :-_,ii; •.•.•.• .,,:.• • p• se 40 .•,, 0.•me,..:.,:v1441;7;1:4..Ntr,:!,;.!.!:::::,Ee,r,;:•;,P1-4.!1.4.404.
,'„, ;24- 41,. .,rP.4.11$'‘‘‘ti: ''Pitt 0-4.',.;•' .,:k"..i.l•1 fiYi; '' l• • -, i;;,-•:;-4-::.;14;'41:.,!:'•'•:-'-'•-•,:::•:-.••,'':,.....•:7:-',.. .::!;,-..,-..4:;•::•-•:::':.47.-!'-.K.•..`.1:.'",'•!•1,• ''' .;:, ,' ,•;;a'. ,4clit.':?4;•:t::;!1,5f!!eVti4.1;;q .e,;;;:::1‘"in•l.',..isi.i.7.•;'!;7g14st4:troett41.
..:"'Kt1.4.1,,,!•4;c .4.'.41,...41,411. :,,,4.t/tt 013- 1;.•?,...,,.•', .': ••,r,;;;;:gq,i,N.14A-.7:?;',!-.'•%.:'.--! •' '''• '•' ' ..••.' %I..... •'• ..'.i...,••••:•.-1..74‘.....;.:) ....V2441,,i'Volg;L:41!.:14..•41;r1111.•4.4:;3..:11.:!'t.514;•1%7:644.:4!...;!,1/4.1.
#-....•:?-fr,.1:4.51.fi.fiellipf.refir,;444,0.ter.!:..oec. 1--,v;.,,...,47.:?.....,,..,;.4..;•7:.:: : ,. . ...., ,:.,,.,•••,•••.:( , . .!•••1' f;4. •4,1.c,...,, ...,:pare:3:,•••,4."...,:te;•••-...kid.4.1..v•or......;•74...ct.-7,1,44 4,
• .. .•....•..',.•••••••:.••.;-.••••••.1--ni• • ••• ..., • • • • b 1)r i:•I • ••'.'. 1;.•...• ,a.,,...,;$.a.,•.4 . 0.,, •4...j.%.4.
'4P'7767q./-/Af•ie2P.:!. /i'VVI%''',5A'' ,‘,..1.,. ,t11.1'.::.1,..•'-..• . •• • • .• .,:•••:,'....:t.:-1:::.•01.i'lia:i -.' ' JI., i ,)-At,;.,. ,N.:..,....i..;,,,•14:0:.A .:1.4.1gv!,•••r.:..r...:,:;:$1.6•14%,,vo.••
'.? .,•• ,..•_,..4..•.`3....?"-^',,, 'iir • . . /11;1:K• It."7•:!.;" .:......!.:-.•• .:.,..r•' • . •. ...! .., .4 • ..•)•:'.........r' ,. 1..i;.... ';.'ell I.'.. ..: • i I. r41 0.1.6..tie•tttV•,ne...1.1.1k 4.•i•,Ii.4.8j:A•AI:4:11..4::1•1‘.....!....,;%...,4•4 It:11.
41...'•;•b.tf. -q '7-1•1911144i.., tilo.•J of. •OCk li.7.;1.10;,• •.', .„ ,1:'. .• ,• •••,••• • .. .• ...••••••.;..•:.'•.••.,,1.'•••••.§..../., .••,, . y "•,i.'Itel, •••,.,,4••:16•••.••••••;•••.4.•:4'. •. r'..',.......di......•..••0?. 1'., •:.•,.••0•
7_/"...4 44,f.'‘..,`• •. •II•fi,.... 4i,vil&r,,,1 *, ..,,P,f„.do, !;%.,':,t,41(r • .2,1;),'.,,..7J,'•:...:-:•!....';;..• ••' .: ...... ! •-.. :..........s.;, ,-:,„•:...(;:,:.!Ii!:-:;•... ),•\::ii y 44.4,,ed to,frili.P P Kii:i....'..t''!••••. •••:.•...:.:•• ..•••,:•••"4.•:.;'''•....•••••;•::... '.,;6.4m(
''.:r.q.' 1 yetv'I:'‘':•'(•^^;',T••••i•s141.P.10-;10"- li,:). an .11,si.•-.)"•.C;;;;...-!.•;••:; ..•'•' '-..'.,' ,•' '...,...:•,•:.,:.',•:',:.'.!..2;•-•,•;:eil..,`•••!•,•••h:y41, 'j,.1:.VI ;• 't bP,.,...,-;•:r;•.r;e,••••;•••Ap.iti.•:.••0.. ••,•,• *,•'.,..1.....: •. ..1...1.t 7. :. V.....:..;.1.......4!.ti•v..t.
:I' 4.11.r•1•41.At ri4eq114(4.1;0:1,1 INA, ..of- ... • i,•., r.,;44...,..v,::•.f?•'..!.!•J•.-T'••'.••.'•k••:...•:,••••:'..!;..1'!:,•;41;2•411,1P:;•0•3.> ''i-"ii'N • • .:,•?.:•.f.,,,,.•v4/..,:;::•••e:••:‘,......••ilt.,.•t:z.:a . :•• :.....• • :•• .....-=.,..-.re.t...R:
'.•AVAlk,4111,..ili,b.ClirD,:k4Fitr44,4..5 1.5.,Tta.1.„.4#1 v.:(1/..kr,;•:.•. be.•?r:... ;/,41)1/1i,;,.!):;.5',;•".,r1;!..,,..i.•I'••;•,,.:.,:i i.,...:Ip•Ntriilite • *If , A'ekteL4V,44•:;'ti:.• ti't illie;:•••4:;•:$"IP....8;........•', .4' ... i'•:...i ..., •••••••••:"• .:.......%•1;• ••• • • .
, ' 7%4 ''''...•;:..4%.4';1••&P:Pait., 0440,6' flOgr I • 7441V1.,14.141•". 'Di_ '1.• 1.; 4.i•"Jp4ii•I:tki)•.'i4..•••.(.....#•••11.0.,..59 . r -1 1;,t3/410„. /4. ' -.V i-t-•,:•:!:.•.::...-gt.l.••. •••r . •..•• ..• • • -, •• •• : . .1 1/4.:
.D. .y:•;:o.-•••:r-•poldill.-• 01011,1..... 4:41?P.:11.4•;,;;I:w' l'il.r...tTit, ;. \p .i.•,•::;;„-•:.•,•, ...../i,,••••„:•,,,,21.1-1,. .,..(,•. 0 4 , 0.. .;:,.0,11?.4:6,!„..if..V,...0%., ••••,...•.!..i,-... • .... , . .. ,. , ..it.t:i....:...... ;4%4;
1:"'4....."1PY:t!)-•%:1,1:Xfii•'747;.124:::4••'•iirl•:!1'litiitl';',:.N•Ati.;%e'tit 4 I' •prl. 4Z.f.4`k.'4;t:'i'li.'7'''fIt''-'•"14-';*.;'•4;''' iP••ter'''t• .41 ?0•r4t"-I'.111t1..; ;•1.0:1•70.r.1.1.!. ;•::.•.....!7;1.::et,!-.',..;.:•'•41 :..4.•1•A:::::.:41......t;
•:;. dl...•.:*:...T;•tit!,•At.f:1-•:-,Yi": ',4;;14iti:1:10`,14;i4...'11$1'43/11'; .:'•,‘ •, r.• i i'!"••..r..;.;11-14:•:'.47.4'-''•'71-•• ••;'i•-' ;;VP0A,V6gi - ' .1'7! l. .k1:4141t4ti'•414.%/.`'.-''":1"'*':1•'••••°''''''..• I`.... `'."1.•' :'::'4'..*:'t.•17'1:'.'":":.'?LI
0
,.:$•!::.„...-1;•ei...1.4.„.••••,..s,..;:•;„..11,1%,•01-.4014;•44..1,!1;1•Ni gdfr. i:• St iff.1.4••t,-.f."%;v:i•';•:4,';,i-'-'1,-:-• ••ifif-a•••i,p% Aft'• • i i• . • ' "fii..t?'..14.1 .•:;!•.••::4"•:•'(,3:ff-•,t.'•Diel...-.••••.,...:•.•:•:..t".1:4••::•!Ct-ei1e4.-•:•'•
--4-•":•14•I'i).,:••;g1;•-..!..f.'..4.1...••••••,.',..:e.:pet-lit',1,,Iii•••1 :Aft,thlf.'%.i_14 614:,-;•,1`.1%41-1.;:,),:!..,..'o." :•,'•:1,1,••;,;;•-;•- •iiP.•••c • q . ),,. 1 P.:4.41. • ,..1.$ • ) 4;11,,,,A,...xt.;P: he • ti •.1".•41....6”1..i -• .1 ••• .- •
, 1'.;.,•1, .1..., •••,/r,i, ,t44:1,et.: :;i,•1.:4",4•,'.:1;•,),11,af:11.....4:14%;.;3:tetot,'144 . f;1'.1-•1•4•Ani,',:fl'••••-;''''''''..•••'•1••••••i."-•'','''•'.:A'''.';'-:1"p,''.41i4fr,A 1•‘Z3j`fii• '•A.`11 *?•1. ''. ts.• A.AX:"
.•;',. ii I,01.-•••740.0.$6";...;,%40.."1701.1•43•11,411;r:Ve•Vdtlir V., ••0.•,lf,: :.7tt•rpideilto',,t:......"...11:•••.';,,:-!i;s..,.....,...4,4:,...,;4.,.,.,.i.,...,a...V.,..
. ••.4:4.°J4,..i, •::%,;.0.ogii. i•.1.0441-4a •,17're, -1.k.• 1,41.0 titi s.• v 1• .„,,•ce K.:::••••- -..•,•i,1••-••k-(L.'•!•• •..'••..,,* -•• •:•••-•••.. ..c.-9`-`,.' ••
Arigrer....y,-9. - .. ; 1...
i•-•;....,..v.iimetv-Ar:id.-. ;:::-,76. ..,' '6' '.1 ''''' '''.' • . '
• V.I.'It-4 , -
BMW of North America, Inc.
Motorcycle Authority Program
R1 100 RT- P standard and optional equipment.
Comfort and Safety:ll, operating independently on both front and rear
• BMW Motorcycle ABS -
wheels.
• Rider's seat adjustable to 3 different heights.
• Electrically adjustable windshield (standard height and "tall" windshields
available).• riders hands.
Adjustable hot air vent for the heights.
two different9
•
adjustable
to
• Gear shift lever 1 (optional).
Dual heat range, heated handlebar grips
• Front/Rear Protection Bars. for play.
• Clutch and front brake levers, adjustable
• Fairing mounted rear view mirrors.
Service and Warranty:
3 year, unlimited mileage, limited warranty.
• mileage, limited Original BMW Parts warranty.
•
12 month, unlimited
• 6,000 mile service intervals.
• Authorized sales and service for servicee at and parts locations.support.
Technical• Service hot line .
Special Police and Emergency Equipment:
• Adjustable solo seat with radio box.
• Electronic siren - wail/yelp signals.
fans - essential for an engine which has to be kept
•
Auxiliary cooling is stationary.
running while the motorcycleCase" saddle
• Choice of City Case "Police Bags" or the larger "Touring
bags.
• Front/Rear Protection Bars•• ower for long duty. Recharges from the
Auxiliary battery - reserve p
standard 700 w charging system.
• Dual front and rear strobes..
speedometer.
• Special authorities s outlet sockets.
• 2 -12 volt accessory
• Rear emergency flasher system.
•
• Standard color - BMW Police Black &White.
Optional Equipment:
• Rear`Pole Light" rotating strobe.
• Dual heat range, heated handlebar grP Radial tires.
• Cast wheels fitted with Dunlop t Sportmax
al at additional cost and
• Additional BMW colors (oP
require additional delivery time).
f
f f
Technical Data . .
1998 BMW R110O RT-P
Motor 1 2 c tinder, 4 stroke boxer en•ine
T •e: 4 valves •er c tinder
Valves: 1085 cc
Dis•Iacement: 90 mm5 c / 70.5 mm
C tinder Bore / Stroke: 66 DIN kW / 90 HP @ 7,250 rem
Power Output: 69 Ib./ft @ 5,500 r•m
Toraue: 10.7:1
Comoression: Air Oil
Coolino: HC, chain _
Valve Timing: Bosch Motronic MA 2.2 �'�iIh
Fuel Preparation: overrun fuel cu toff.
Regulated 3-way catalyst with
Catalytic Converter: lambda probe.
2 bearing sets
Crankshat: 5 s.eed
Gearbox: 1st 4.16; 2nd 2.91; 3rd 2.13;
Gear Ratio: 4th 1,74; 5th 1.45:1
2.91:1
Rear Axle Gearing:
Electrical S stem ronic
En•ine Control S stem: Mot of W
Generator: 70012V/19Ah
Battery:
Dimensions and Wei•hts 87.8 in. 2230 mm
Length: 58,3 in. 1480 mm)
Wheelbase: 6.8 gallon includes approx. 1 gallon
•Tank Volume: reserve
Adjustable to 30.7 in., 31 .5 in, or
Seat height unladen: 32.3 in. seat hei•hts.
Unladen weight, without official
622 lbs. (282 kg)
e•ui•ment: 1080 lbs. 490 k•
Total Wei•ht:
Performance 120 m•h. a••roximate
To• S•eed: 11 .2 sec
Acceleration 50-100 m•h 13.28 sec @ 97 m.h
Acceleration 1/4 mile: Unleaded Premium
o Fuel:
Chassis Distortion resistant, 3 part, made of
Frame: front and rear frame sections in
combination with a load bearing
engine.
BMW Telever with central shock.
Fork: 4 7 in. 120 mm
Sus•ension Travel: Sini1e swine arm (BMW Paralever
Swin• Arm: Drive shaft with rina and •inion.
Final Drive: Centrally located shock with
Suspension Strut: infinitely variable rebound
adjustment, hydraulic suspension
pre-loading, infinitely adjustable.
5.3 in. 135 mml
Sus•ension travel:
Brakes Double disc-brake 12 inches (305
Front: mm) in diameter, with floating
bearings, 4 piston, fixed yokes.
Single disc-brake, 10.2 inches (260 mm) in diameter,iameter, fixed, with 2
piston floating yokes.
Fade resistant.
Wheelss:ake nings: BMW Cross-Spoke Wheels.
W BMW Cast Alto Wheels (optional).
Rim Size: x 18
. Cross Spoke Front: 3.5.5 x 18
Cross Spoke Rear:
Cast Alloy Front: 3.50 x 17 MT H2
Cast Alloy
Rear: 4.50 x 18 MT H2
Tires: 110/80 ZR 18 tubeless
Cross Spoke Front: 150/70 ZR 17 tubeless
Cross Spoke Rear:
Front: 127/70 ZR 17 tubeless
Cast Alloy 160/60 ZR 18 tubeless
Cast Alloy Rear:
•
BMW R 1100 RT- P - Purchase Options
Purchase Option Program: There are three options available for the
1100
RT-P. All options are designed to take
BMW R rrd that is
bestadpurchase of thegoftheyear, unlimited mileage, limited wa Y
best advantage 3 Y police motorcycle. The details are as
standard with the R 1100 RT-P p
follows:
Purchase Option 1 - PD Choice.
The PD Choice Program allows your department, at the end of a pre-
determined
your motorcycles in to a BMW Motorcycle
time period, to turn u
purchase of the units for the indicated "Balloon"
Dealer or to complete the amount. It's your choice. Duringthe time the motorcycles are in service,
your department would be responsible for the monthly payments as
stated in the i=D Choice contract.
The turn in period can be at the end of two, or three years of police
service, but must be stated in the original bid proposal . The actual
rchase rice of the R 1100 RT-P in the PD Choice Program will depend
.,u P
on the equipment specified.
Purchase Option 2 - Conditional Buy Back.
In the Conditional Buy Back Program, BMW of North
Amer of icarInc.ord wilt
9
arran e, through its dealer network, for the repurchase
r of
BMW police motorcycles.
lace at the end of three years of service with no
The buy back will take P back price per unit is determined, on a
•mileage limitations. The buy percentage is then applied to the
sliding scale, by purchase volume. This p Program contract,
•
per unit cost as stated in the Conditional Buy Backcontracts, painting
less the original cost of emergency equipment, service
etc. This price will be stated in the Conditional Buy ConditionalRepurchase Agreement Back contract at the
time of purchase. See the
attached
and table of residual value percentages.
Purchase Option 3 - Cash Program.
hin down, nothing to pay option. Your
This is the time honored everyt 9
department owns, rides, maintains, and sells the motorcycles.
y
Conditional Repurchase Agreement - Example
"Name of BMW motorcycle dealer" agrees to the1r tpures d hase ferosum of f all XX,
R 1100 RT-P-P Authority��of thre2les yearsluded iof service on the following
SX,XXX.00 each at the e
conditions:
Motorcycles for conditional repurchase are to be Department"returned as equipped
when originally delivered to the "Name of
Motorcycles for conditional repurchase are to be in good operating
condition.
Motorcycles for conditional repurchase are be in sound,se damaged
e
condition. All repairs as a result aaccidentsor BMW specifications.
using original and new BMW parts
Motorcycles for conditional repurchase are to receive regular routine
maintenance as specified in the BMW Authority oto warrantyc clo k es e icey
ce
Logbook. These regularly scheduled services,
additional work deemed necessary,are to b performed
ee ormedionedServiceusing
g original
BMW parts and are to be noted in the above
Book.
Motorcycles for conditional repurchase are to be a made available for
collection by "Name of BMW Motorcycle
Dealer"City Police Department
#1 Main Ave. North
City, AA. 00000
or at any other location mutually agreed upon by the City Police
Department and "Name of BMW Motorcycle Dealer". •
G
e e
Back _ Residual Value Percentages
Police Motorcycle Buy_B
Example Purchase Price: S15,990.00
Units
Residual Example
a Residuals
Annual Purchase Per cage $8,954.00
1 - 20 57% $9,114.00
21 - 40 58% $9,274.00
41 - 60 59% S9,434.00
8161 - 80 60% $9,594.00
0 - 100 61 % . $9,754.00
11 - 120 o, Sg,g14.00
121 - 140 02 `0
141 - 160
63% S10,074.00
Attachment B
RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
Rancho Mirage Police Department
Motorcycle Enforcement Program
Final Report to the Office of Traffic Safety
For review period April 1, 1997 to March 31, 1998
This is the final report for the Office of Traffic Safety grant awarded to the City of Rancho
Mirage. This grant added two motorcycle officers, dedicated solely to traffic enforcement, to the
Rancho Mirage police force. The primary goal was traffic accident reduction through increased
speed limit enforcement and impaired driver (DUI) recognition and apprehension. Another goal of
this grant was to decease traffic accident injuries by improving awareness and enforcement of
mandatory seatbelt/child safety restraint seat laws.
CREDITS
The following is a list of the personnel that assisted in the development, implementation,
management, and success of this program. By no means is this a complete list of all personnel that
assisted with this project and helped insure its success. To all personnel who are not listed, thank
you again for your assistance.
Chief S. Bloomquist Palm Desert Station Commander at grant conception/initiation.
Chief N. Lingle Palm Desert Station Commander at grant completion.
Inv. M. Wasserman Public Information Officer/Palm Desert Station.
Mr. Scott Morgan Director of Administrative Services for the City of Rancho Mirage.
Palm Desert Station Explorers
Rancho Mirage C.O.P.S. (Citizens on Patrol)
This project is a part of the California Traffic Safety Program and was made possible
through the support of the California Office of Traffic Safety, State of California, and the National
Traffic Safety Administration.
DISCLAIMER
The opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in this publication are those of the
author and not necessarily those of the State of California, the National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration, or the Federal Highway Administration.
PROJECT PERSONNEL
Sgt. R. Friedli Initial grant proposal research, documentation, and supervision.
Sgt. R. Kirby Final grant supervision
Deputy D. Devinny Motorcycle officer and project planning.
Deputy K. Vest Motorcycle officer, statistics, project planning, and quarterly
reports.
f
GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
PROJECT GOALS:
1. Were speed related fatal and injury collisions reduced by 15% from the adjusted base year
(April 1995-March 1996) total of 27 to 23?
2. Were fatal and injury collisions reduced by 15% from the adjusted 1995 year (April 1995-
March 1996) total of 90 to 77?
3. Were seatbelt compliance increased by 10 % from the base year of 78.4 to 88.4 by the end of
the grant year?
4. Was seatbelt compliance increased by 10 % from the 1995 base year survey?
5. Was child safety seat compliance increased by 10 % from the 1995 base year survey?
6. Was the OTS "3 Phase Speed and Control Program" met to include speed assessment, program
publicity, automated speed awareness, and speed enforcement?
7. Was the grants impact on crime by tracking non-related traffic arrests that initiated from grant
activity met?
8. Was the Office of Traffic Safety faxed a short description of any new traffic safety event or
program at least two weeks in advance?
9. Was a press conference or media event conducted prior to April 1, 1997 to kick-off the grant?
f
PROJECT OBJECTIVES:
1. Were D.U.I. arrests increased by 15% from the 1995 base year of 123 to 141 by December
31, 1997?
2.Were hazardous citations increased by 15% from the 1995 base year total of 2448 to 2815
by December 31, 1997?
3. Were seatbelt citations equaling at least 10% of the total hazardous citations and child seat
safety seat citations equaling at least 10% of total hazardous citations?
4. Were surveys conducted on seat belt, child safety seats, and bicycle helmet usage in April
and September of each grant year?
5. Did the Rancho Mirage Office of Traffic Safety Traffic Task Force meet at least three times
during the grant year?
6. Was information and education material to increase community awareness of traffic safety
issued. distributed and coordinated with local media?
7. Were faxes sent to the Office of Traffic Safety, at least two weeks in advance, with a brief
description of any traffic safety program or event?
8. Was the grant's impact on crime measured by tracking non-traffic related arrests that
initiated from grant activity?
9. Was the number of children or adults "saved by the child safety seat, seat belt or bicycle
helmet" reported to the Office of Traffic Safety?
10. Was a press conference or media event conducted to kick-off or publicize the grant. Was
the event coordinated with the Office of Traffic Safety Public Information Officer?
METHODOLOGY
Seatbelt enforcement was conducted by both motorcycle officers and patrol personnel.
One seatbelt/child safety seat check point was performed, where literature and information was
dispersed to the public to increase awareness of their mandatory use. Patrol personnel were given
update training as to the associated seatbelt/child safety seat sections in the vehicle code and
shown training videos regarding their importance.
Seatbelt, child safety seat, and bicycle helmet surveys were conducted three times, as
opposed to the two times required, during the grant period. Surveys were conducted by the
motorcycle officers in plain clothes at designated areas. Once the surveys were complete,
calculations were made using average daily traffic data provided by the California Highway Patrol.
The OTS "3 Phase Speed Control Program" was implemented by the grant city and the
enforcement personnel. Speed assessment was conducted by using a radar trailer purchased by the
grant city and operated by city personnel. Once this data was collected, it was provided to
enforcement personnel so that reactive enforcement could be planned for problem areas/times.
Program publicity was kept in the local media by the varies programs (seatbelt checkpoint, school
safety program, and DUI enforcement program) that were planned and conducted by the
motorcycle officers.
Automated speed awareness was conducted by the above mentioned radar trailer operated
by the grant city. This trailer was equipped with a display board that displayed the approaching
vehicles speed and the posted speed limit. The motorcycle officers worked speed limit
enforcement in the areas where the trailer was positioned at selected problem times
Speed enforcement was conducted by the assigned motorcycle officers and available patrol
personnel. Patrol personnel were encouraged to stop violators and issue citations as opposed to
the standard high number of verbal warnings. Motorcycle officers worked to develop a
"teamwork" attitude among patrol and traffic personnel to reduce traffic accidents and increase
hazardous and seatbelt citations.
Information and educational material was provided to the local media and directly to the
public. Information was provided to the media before any special project/event and they provided
coverage (T.V. news story or newspaper articles). The public received information directly
several times during the grant period, the first event was a scheduled seatbelt checkpoint.
Seatbelt/Child Safety seat information was provided to each vehicle as it passed through the check
point. Additional information was provided directly to the students at the Rancho Mirage
Elementary School and the Maywood Country Day School. Motorcycle officers presented a hour
long safety presentation at the beginning and end of the school year.
The grants impact on crime was tracked by recording non traffic related arrests initiated by
motorcycle personnel. These arrests were recorded on a daily basis by using a daily activity
log/spreadsheet developed for this purpose (see documentation section and attached copy).
The proposed project period for this grant was from October 1, 1996 to December 31,
1997. This was delayed and changed to April 1, 1997 to March 31, 1998. This delay was caused
by problems associated with vehicle/equipment acquisition and personnel selection. Once both
motorcycles, associated equipment, and personnel were selected and trained, enforcement began
in earnest after the OTS approved media coverage. This coverage consisted of three local
television stations (one Spanish only channel) and the local newspaper. OTS was notified by fax
and telephone a minimum of two weeks prior to the scheduled grant event/program.
PROBLEMS
At the beginning of this grant a cumulative problem created a three month delay. The
grant period was readjusted from a calender year (Jan 97 - Dec 97) format to the second quarter
through second quarter format (Apr 97-Mar 98.). This delay was caused by several factors. The
first of these was the purchase/delivery of the selected motorcycles. The second problem was the
purchase, delivery, and installation of the radios to be used on the motorcycle units. Due to the
motorcycle being owned by the grant city (Rancho Mirage) as opposed to the contracted law
enforcement agency (Riverside County Sheriff Dept.), an independent radio technician/installer
was needed to install the 800 MHZ radio system. Once the technician was located, the installation
had to be scheduled/performed per his timetable since he was located far away from the local
area.
Another problem encountered during the setup portion of this grant was locating space for
the selected motorcycle officers in a P.O.S.T. certified training program. The San Bernardino
County Sheriff's Department Emergency Vehicle Operations Center (E.V.O.C.) conducts Basic
Police Motorcycle Operators courses throughout the year. These scheduled classes are in high
demand and fill to capacity quickly. The first available training date was in January of 1997. One
operator completed the training in January, while the second had to re-attend the training
academy in February due to a training accident. The previously mention problem with the
motorcycles also affected the training schedule. Both officers attended the academy with training
motorcycles belonging to other cities/agencies.
A reoccurring mechanical problem with one of the purchased Kustom Pro-Laser II's
resulted in constant and repeated warranty work. The defective item was returned to Kustom
several times with the same problem where it was eventually replaced with another Lidar unit.
This replacement unit experienced the same problem after a short period of use (two weeks) and
it was also returned. A third unit was issued and no further problems have been reported. Even
though the defective Lidar units were troublesome and inconvenient at the beginning, the Kustom
product is far superior to anything else available. The success of this grant in the area of speed
enforcement is directly related to the Kustom products' precision, accuracy, and ease of use.
A minor problem became evident after the program was underway. The grant city, Rancho
Mirage, is located in the Coachella Valley. The environment of this desert community has
extremes in temperatures ranging from the mid 110's in the summer to almost freezing during the
nighttime hours of winter. The selected motorcycle for this grant was the 1996 Kawasaki
KZ1000. Overall satisfaction with this unit is very high. Since this unit is air cooled and the grant
area is a desert, officers experienced problems with engine performance/cooling/maintenance
during periods of high temperature. When this grant was first proposed, there was a limited
choice in the area of police motorcycle manufactures. Now there are a total of three manufactures
(Kawasaki, BMW, and Harley-Davidson) actively competing. Future grant cities in areas of
extreme temperatures similar to this would be advised to select a motorcycle with a water cooled
engine.
A possible means of increasing the effectiveness of this grant without increasing the
amount of money required would be through the use of moving radar permanently mounted on
the police motorcycles. For example, two Kustom Golden Eagle Ka-band radars can be purchased
for motorcycle installation at a price of about $5000 ($2500 ea.). Each Kustom Pro-Laser II costs
about $4500. I would recommend now that both motorcycles should have been equipped with
f
one Golden Eagle moving radar (front and rear antennas) and only one Kustom Pro-Laser II
purchased. I would also advise both motorcycles be equipped with the bracket so that the laser
unit can be used on either one. The reason for this is that a sizable amount of time is spent by the
officers riding and while moving, speed limit enforcement is difficult.
Our experience has shown that with two motorcycle officers and a seven day work week,
there is a limited amount of times when both are working together. If both units were equipped as
listed above, one officer could work speed enforcement with the Lidar unit while the other
worked seatbelt enforcement or radar enforcement using the installed radar unit. Another
advantage of installed moving radar would be during nighttime enforcement hours. Both officers
worked nighttime hours during this grant period for the two DUI enforcement programs (Summer
DUI Apprehension Program and Holiday DUI Apprehension Program). Due to the lower traffic
flow during nighttime hours, and the open roadway areas in the grant city, the ability to move
about and still be able to conduct speed limit enforcement would be substantial. Rancho Mirage's
traffic accident history indicates DUI and excessive speed are the primary causes of the city's high
nighttime injury/fatal traffic accident rate.
This suggestion would be cost effective in comparison to the purchase of the two laser
units and would increase effectiveness in several areas. The suggestion would work very well in
areas were roadways are wide open and there is a problem with speeding violators. This
suggestion is being proposed for implementation in the grant city for the up coming year.
s
f
RESULTS
PROJECT GOALS
Speed related fatal and injury traffic accidents totaled 21 for the grant period (0 fatal and
21 injury respectively). This equates into a reduction of 24% from the grant base year. Total fatal
and injury accidents equaled 73 (1 fatal and 72 injury) for the grant period. This equates into a
reduction of 19% from the grant base year. The sole fatal traffic accident was caused by the
driver suffering a heart attack.
Seatbelt compliance was increased by more than 10% during the grant period. Compliance
was at 78.4% at the initial survey and is now 92.3%. Total compliance increase to date is 13.9%.
Seatbelt compliance goals were also met in comparison to the 1995 base year survey. Compliance
increase to date from 1995 is 14%.
Seatbelt citations for the grant year totaled 19% of the total number of hazardous
citations issued. Childseat citations for the grant year totaled 1% of the total number of hazardous
citations issued. The child seat goal was not met due to the older age demographics of the project
city. Rancho Mirage is primarily a middle to retirement age community with a high percentage of
second/seasonal homes and residents.
Child safety seat compliance goal were also achieved during the grant period. Initial child
safety seat surveys revealed compliance at a 80% level. Surveys now reveal compliance is at
91.8%. This equates to an increase of 11.8%. Due to the small population of children in the City
of Rancho Mirage this goal is extremely hard to evaluate.
Adoption of OTS "3 Phase Speed Control Program" was performed immediately and
showed substantial results within a short time frame. Accident rates are expected to decline
further in the year following the grant period. The traffic enforcement system developed during
the grant period is still in place and will continue into the future. Public awareness of traffic safety
issues and problems is still maintained by several seasonal programs/events (school presentations,
seasonal DUI programs, media coverage, etc.).
The impact on crime not associated to the grant project was met by recording all relevant
information. Grant activity results in several stolen vehicle recoveries, drug arrests, and weapon
seizures. The area in which the highest affect on crime was made was in the area of warrant
arrests. There was a total of 91 warrant arrests were made during the grant period.
PROJECT OBJECTIVES
One of the areas where the most success was made was in DUI arrests. DUI arrests
during the 1995 base year totaled 123. Total DUI arrests for the grant year were 234. This is
an increase of 90% increase over the base year total. The two motorcycle officers assigned to
the grant accounted for 64 of the DUI arrests.
Hazardous citations is another area where a large difference was made. Total hazardous
citations for the base year were 2448. Total citations in the same category for the grant year
were 3568. This is a 45.7% increase of the base year total. Total citations issued for unsafe
speed were 2370. The grant supplied Kustom Pro-Laser II Lidar equipment was the largest
single factor that helped achieve this goal. This equipment's ability to identify, track, and
confirm a violators true speed in a very dense traffic environment is unparalleled. Combine
this precision with the motorcycle officers ability to rapidly catch and stop the violator vehicle
and a formidable traffic enforcement force is created.
The goal for seatbelt citations in relationship to hazardous citations was also met. Total
seat belt citations for the grant period were 698. The ratio of this total in comparison to the
total number of hazardous citations equals 19%. The objective of maintaining a ratio of 10%
of total hazardous citations to child safety seat citations was not met. Total child safety seats
citations during the grant period were 35. In comparison to the hazardous citations total this
equates to a 1% ratio. In the area of enforcement the motorcycle also played an important role.
Based on the higher riding position and field of view in relation to the patrol car seatbelt/child
safety seat violations were more easily identified, cited, and convicted.
The required surveys (seatbelt, child safety seat, and bicycle helmet usage) were
important part in evaluating program effectiveness. After the surveys were conducted,
programs were planned in response to any problems areas detected. After the programs were
completed, additional surveys were conducted to determine effectiveness and compliance.
Overall surveys revealed valuable information and evaluated the programs effectiveness.
Surveys will continue to be conducted after the conclusion of the grant to gauge continuing
compliance/effectiveness of new programs.
GRANT EQUIPMENT
The equipment purchased by the grant (motorcycles, radios, Lidar units, and uniforms)
were used by the two selected motorcycle officers. All items were used for enforcement,
educational presentations, or demonstrations in support of the grant goals/objectives. Prior to this
grant equipment an active traffic enforcement program was in effect using marked patrol vehicles.
This met with very limited success (if any) due to heavy traffic conditions, roadway
configurations, and the inherent limitations of radar.
The grant equipment substantially minimized if not eliminated all of these problems and
produced the substantial improvements noted above.
K o
0
(...) W N N N N N N N N N N CD Op v O Cr, A t� Ni
-- 0 CO CO - 0) cr - W Ni O CD 00 - O Cr' ? W Ni — 0
O
Bf
P>
0 ,% P afS
O -11O;
O '� 9
1,
9hfi
o "i' Sfoo
hf S
o OG ay
o T G,.
7,o
9L
,„ o/a
o ` fo
c,
ao
o T�0 9P n
O T% o�G2 0
ti
0.iG2 ti
O kr-
9S,
o SGS
AP
oa
o - Go�c �c0
P)
S6b
fs/% Pi_
o �s, I,.
c- Psf
o l'o oh/9
0 6a oy'9
of
.o
O �o9r7
o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0 lO
5--- •
',..-.-L..i54...Z'''--:7 -- ',-.0. -•p -'114•- - 1,k.:*4.-44-1..ii, 1 - .- • *:••• v--: ,
-----•-,.
.s - V • .....„ - ......., .,-•;?•,---- • -- -- •\- - --'
•,--,....„,,.....i• -- ...::‘,...,-, , . t„....,L,-, •-,,:,..-.4..*,-v-_,- ! .. -,. ,._..,..t-,:., •
• . . ...,-
si• 4.2. 41,4e_dt.:'ir-•"".....\1,---..;' :- ..- - ,, --'• ,
3/4 .-71,. •
, ..., . ;;:''.• ' Wwq:144,,..2„...,_•-•t. .' • ,..., •r.-.-. 2Z'-. 5.
44r,:rt......-•)rar,---.!•5;.- • 1 -- - ' ,- ,S."
,t4. ..e...•••••- •:'-.....- •-':--
-
' -;• 1-.1. . . .
.^P"..:v.....V.If11.--."7-*:,.7'...-: .. - •-.1`;'•41%.;-%' ••
e-.....:-- 4 -- (...41•••:./„• , •. li 1 •1/4.;•. '.. , ..•17......'lit;:',.....r, ,I., - 0
• :7:1----Y411-/ 1;-i-:•., .i•
s, •- .0. 4., . . ,.z,-.4--:-"•••:.7-ik''. 'XI
• - / i . S •..."1 i 44• - .41 -ri•,,if ''• ', ,.ri...%...?..,1 „. ,
• Vt.0 '..: ' '• . " .4.„5.,,-71-- .4,
r ' • "..., '''...'--t•-Vs' • "•
:;.;. ' •' 4,•-"V`I :
•-• . 4:':141-‘-...:t 74::::, -.1:4_ft;',04,
1.."1 ' . 'I ""''‘r -.5.;,X•tr..S. ••••aCti•.; +P .
t * -• • t... ' •:-.•:1'';'s_I..; •
..•j ' _ ,LIA•1.41:,_••....•,•;:.•:••_..
.... ' f - SS 1E2/14,4V z: ; • -1.:,-;',4!.7,. .IL•••:,,:f.-i'-' .
: ..•, ,
.. ..,. . •
- ' :k.... . , EZIF:'r? .. .) ,_tZi Mai ,...., -:. v:-• . cra.,,,,,- - ..-••,
, '‘ ':-3"• pi fig i re fi jo ai Lutl ,, •„;
;'7:4'.--'"', .---.1•7; 1. .• - .-2%.' •c• •--ta"
_ ii I ; '7-' -.4•:-'4.: •
'...iii'''''"t" 1.---1----.•,,fit22 • • _ .44`27-,..... -,•.
f
1 ..:•-• .-
. - ip.var-,...,. .t, .4 mot'.0.4.1:-./ •.e ' • 1 -!--i'Prvil,,,!•.-4---4t-.!.
.. -..-,•;••.•.‘1„.... .. „ , vi,.., -.rt...r..r, —- • ,,..,'• .'.••.JA. t.•-::"2...•tt•
•4„,,r,41.:At. 4.:
• r::: :•:1‘• : ' f - .4•7:, il3n'. ... 'Ar4'. .3.•
i ."... 11.1,..... .
• ..''. tit„, 1, i .:....,g rtiVItr-11X%-a 4. •'41 4-'• 1 :°+ - ...•."14r-''''e.*:.--.**..J•...4--
-..., ....,,.., 4
-'1.11.7..t‘ ','.7•11.--... - lit - %-,,,Y1,
,-4.; •
'.. -.., •• - • -...• -......1 -Jt-t•- I ?. •.
fr:J.L.L.? .. •._,...a 1.4 iruc.,. ....z...tl.'-,f
•4. F\''r -1 N;:g'i Fill -n1 k:''.."' • ".1 ,
'\ ., ..: .•
..2 _ `t..,NLLN\
-I . •-,=._ -- •
•-•t• • _,• - - . -
-.::. .-,?‘ -
-...,
' •• ' , :.-7.----1.-,-...1K--. 1 . ,
. .':t -,-4--,...;.- ',‘.--. --1 •--J,--,,, ----41-t.;,?,4:1--•- * .,------- ,, ,/, ......,,... ..
,- ., .....,s-c..„ .--,;-‘,.. ,„- .-.....:,,,.:.!..i.,,..-4.,7 ;_.-.L.:..,,.-:...- ,.. v: •
1 •
•AIN.
. •
• ',--=.> ,„ ,..,: : fZ'',:. ..!--;r-41 - .. It'll
its..2:2;:t..-4t4.,, .-'- --J;iii i•-•-..:,-,1-_-.:1 y;•;-.7...5-•<,,-71-r''-ig •e. 1'..a '.., t\-• , •
-.,
t7,••,- ;•:-.-.,'":-'-: •' ';'-'- '`:-..- .-''-',' - .'.,•••••• '•, ".•:•:.j_•;.•--' ;.i$1ii. ‘,-1.`14 -t __ --
. •*., ,,, -, . .• ,
•,.:••.;. ---,-%. '.,'.71-.1-s.: -m-7--::/17;'77-r- ••,'-':`-k--1.**.'•• .
ck:- .7.---!..'.' ---:-.. . .--:." -.: '_ '1' L'• :.-- . • .
.4- •••••-• ,•••if 1%
',v-.:,'*1 '4..I'lLia...ar.:ve.: :4-.S. tt.L 1 -4.1_ 1....t. -.,,t.:t• , .71_,_ •• A .-1,----:-
'•:.--.•••4:,-'zi 1 ".r•45.7::•-i,.,-.1„.•`.i"-17..„ fc,N-1 u.cr.:--- .. ei .4:i• . 4 1 - 4.",....E-:,L::=--". 71'7 '';•-•"-' :.---*"'I"'1.-I :-.'--,`,.v.:`.6 r^? L'*4 -...... . • •
- g icii
1 i r.••I .-
;1.4•••,* -;..•r: .1 c".::"......f,.:-al*..';".,...,...,_.,.;... . , : •••,-• • *:.-
14 •••a .,
-.•./. ,f•-•• '4 -:-:'.', ..•-• .•-:--.:,' "-.• : '. ' . .
-'"•0-,...,,...,:4,...., ...1 • • •.- -
. i • .Or :
---••
. , ,
\ ,1 ti,). 2
, at:: .--
.i,.. 0
,:-... •i•,, _ ,imitt . .
t-itN,-7:.1...• .. - •I.: ,. 1 • / '--:' -.
,.. 1.• .. * *".1...
', 1 JP•t"--c.-...
'" ii0.0.....ri
...•
-
..."?." '''•`'.. • . .. 1, ... ,. ....„,
•
.
11. '+,:i.• ' •• • 4 .
„-, •
It ,--• '‘..
. „ ;4,-...1.14 --4 . , '-.7..,-W tr...•,•,._,L,,,,11.1„.„_...) - /
tv::.••••
7:
• .1!•*":.
','..nj:: '''•limn.... .!G. ' _ .'-:'.-. , :•4 g4,
--' \/-• , • , 12
_....4 •••••;b
N ,
(1 ,\ , ,1•. Is= •
.. '%,......• ' ,. .
\-...r1. ) •-'- - ---•:-,-- - -.
--
-. :,.`.- '.• • - \_, •r;'s •-•\ s_.,..--
Ai.A I A
i-,, '''''-t -0, - • , sp. 4.4,,i . - , ' -A '
it. .‘ . ..., ....4.
ti,t• • 1 . ,4•.••,tr..8e.C.- .1:.:'
1. •'t •,,, ,-.,....ii".?..A.-
,
• • •• ' -
•?14.--e,, ,
. .
••-••• •
• „
%air \•% '4! _J. (, -%-e• , tf.
• ....
!!1
..4 I , .
• -
•: ' -
• .sZs. . ;
. • .
•• • \
•
.) • -- ---
I V-!•‘ ".I. '"i A • ..
,. , _. , • • ,
‘111 ...v.., A.•,,,,..- .- t„.. . .7.1-1.*
,
'k , •,., .).- . • 40t - _--.,,., . ,
.••r " •
,
(1. 1 • .i.,
::if -'• I--
... ‘ . .,.. , !.
lo•ti• . : _ t..., . ,,,t -s l
31 n sa. • '
....4 .,
• • ,1-% ,--, -.. ,o7 ---- i ,.`,-•*Y--•k •,,,,L,
•• t ..V• .t ••:'
?b•e • I ,f
,I ,%.. As.Z• it •Ob , . '‘-''..'i• -.. W.,:-3
' 1' N,P.,1.V11Wil 114111 ,,t,. • 16:: . ".. ,•
-,;‘,}.1.:" . ..''' • ,-
" •'.7›.
. t '' .,.‘./1 •N'• S4 7 ; .,it.- :, ,.. , . .
• -..--:-.• .. ,, 1
-•.., ,,-
N 11 •• 7 •••i''... - ' .f •:1:1 ..t • . • • ..,, .s, ,•if...-....,• • . z.r.:,--,c.:•.
- ..- . ..0",,e4Mat' '_v -:`.-:$-_:,.-'17.--• ..t.--,..1.47e..-,••.:,...
.• • 4-). „,.....- e ,40- —
, . — . •94.
' A. ..'- -w1:14 1 ''' :..e.I.4 di'4 0•-••:::. .4..: -••••-t''''‘.'..e.
_ t.0-:.• • ..., , , - - '..'-' 4.- ':' .•.-4-/-*--.......
44 1 '---- '14.' . .! ' .:-''.• • *''0'•--
.. . . -,.. . .74.. ..
2-"•,,....e,:." 0,-;.- '_ ,,,,,.. ,_ , ,,...,,$ ..,--T.:.: -'-‘.': ‘."4.-‘..1.:..-.. -.'.. -.:
BM IUUKI-1' tUucc: Aio Lot k.)
BMW's R1100RT-P Police Motorcycle
The motorcycle illustrated to the left, on
a facsimile of the cover of the BMW of
North America "BA'IW Authority
Motorcycles" brochure, is a version of
the R1100RT civilian motorcycle
specially designed for police (i. e.,
"authority") duty
BMW manufactures the largest number
of police motorcycles in service
worldwide. In the United States,
however, use of the BMW motorcycle by
authorities really has not occurred until
BMW Authority Motorcycles recent years, perhaps largely stimulated
by the California Highway Patrol (CHP).
In 1997 the CHP selected the R1100RT-
P as its duty motorcycle (see photo
helm), supplanting all its Kawasaki. and
• 1 Harley-Davidson motorcycles. It now
operates some 415 R1100RT-P BMW
� .�4'�,,,•. d 1� _j motorcycles on the state's highways and
' 1
-� x� --a interstates.
•�: .4. - s
•
•
gut '� - : w• Local police agencies have started to
aZ=. �-
- purchase BMWs. But the conversion to
• _ BW has gone slowly because of the
4 iniMtial purchase price of an R1100RT-P
;y compared to Kawasaki s KZ1000 and
:.: • Harley-Davidson police motors.
• However, some departments have been
selecting BMWs in spite of the higher
initial price because of their superior life-
cycle costs and reliability, as well as the
officer safety provided by BMW's anti-
lock braking system (ABS). When
BMW's ABS prevents an accident and
keeps an officer out of the hospital, its
higher initial purchase price becomes
insignificant, if not welcome.
http://jeff.dean.home.att.net/rt-p.htm 01/23/2001
131V1W K11UUK1-r 1-on .; ,oiutoli.) .:
! li- w.N 4 i•IT
^ Ya �s I S
1.
if C�. -1 sh' : tt 1 � .
Alachua County Sheriff, Florida, R1100RT--P. California Highway Patrol RI100RT-P
Above is a local example—a very colorful
county sheriffs R1100RT-P in service in
Florida.
In the town of Oro Valley, Arizona, a suburb
of Tucson, Motor Officer John Teachout 1
(see photo, right, with Santa Catalina ,w x
Mountains in the background) was not 'r
satisfied with the Kawasaki police motors he ,. '-s y 4 :, y. ,.
and his fellow motor officers had been ,,4, • y
provided. Their downtime for repairs were ''� ; •i ?._.., '‘•.
extensive, and per-mile maintenance costs ' - t .;... _$ a
were too high, in his opinion. On his own, he �' .'. y _�
researched the marketplace and determined : ,p
that the BMW R1100RT-P was the ;i •
'.-,54 '.;
motorcycle his department should use. He r � r
assembled information from the CHP and ' % -. ' ' ' '
elsewhere and presented his proposal to his - &.• r
superior officers. Convinced, they authorized
issuance of a town purchase order to lb! r=
Tucson's Iron Horse Motorcycles for one
RI IOORT-P. Today, it has been joined by
three more R1100RT-Ps, and all town
Kawasaki police motors have been retired
from duty.
The nearby town of Marana, Arizona. now has also acquired an R 1 100RT-P and will add
more of them in the near future.
http://jeff.dean.home.att.net/rt-p.htm 01/23/2001
BMW K11tout:i-t• t uux i�unoi,),.►.: - ` •
i --i_v•41Pos
• _ i
_. r
•; • t - I
.afJi �• 1• ICr
%';',,,f ,/•�,'/,Y:)-M,l/,;:;fir
'.'•fir/�/4i/ -. !}�1/ :tJ�///r 1,'rr./////// /�xt / �777��� •r>,� 4
•r,'" /.i:f,_ r. rY.a'"_%(1:. , 1.'. :r//:� it j r/JY�' /;r/
YJ. I�-> ,.• i. {J // ,1.,y.r;-J > r/ :r
„,
�'"'ti , .....�.. 1 ..,Fl y I' . 4
•
f L
t. . 1 STAZ£
1. filili ., -,..;--- IR,troAii& - -;:.,-
Above, left, is the Oro Valley motor officer corps. These guys could not be happier with
their new motorcycles (or"motors," as police officers call them), and look tough enough
for anything!
A North Carolina Highway Patrol Rl 100RT-P is shown in the right photo above. Note
the use of cross-spoke wheels, as found on the BMW R1150GS and some versions of the
R1100R, and the standard civilian R1100RT sidestand. BMW of North America has
developed a special locking police sidestand for Rl 100RT-P service duty.
Unfortunately, in Tucson the police department, like so many others, looks only at initial
purchase price and not at cost over the life of the motorcycle nor at the officer safety
provided by ABS. It continues to order the cheapest option out there, the Kawasaki
KZ 1000. 1 have been told that some other police departments insist on Harley-Davidson
police motors because of departmental tradition and/or they "look tough." One officer
with whom I spoke objected to BMW police motors because, he said, "they don't have
floorboards." If the choice is floorboards or handling and ABS, is there really a choice?
,. ►f . . ..bra t - '''t• l••cci.lrrf. .
http://jeff.dean.home.att.net/rt-p.htm 01/23/2001
13N1W RI 1U01(1-1 l oi►k:e i.wwi..).,i.. •
r
‘14.411r
Whgjill*rIJ
..
• lit` .-
_j
'"
I 'M f '_
......,..
.L., ........-- ,,
R1100RT-P.c in-- Duhlin, Ohio- . . . . Escondido, California. . . . . .
and{i•oodcliff Lake, New Jersey.
r ii4`-=
-*Ai) . . - 01..—mtca 3...
f.g
.... Imo (; �.. �..�.
c"F / l
ii. KS.a%:;�••:'' X.
r-•
_ ! ,,.1 atzi:., ,
f :/ • • t S,MV 10'
.. •t :'`IP l•, .l y �+ _! . -.
,...iiiiiii.,
RI IOURT-P-. of the Oregon llighwav Patrol. Right photos:.IParana,Arizona—out with the
old(far right), in with the new BAIit 1
pis .dellin
U. S. Police Departments Using the BMW
R1100RT-P
As of January 2001:
http://jeff.dean.home.att.net/rt-p.htm 01/23/2001
BMW RI IOURI-I' Police tvluturc}etc ;"�`
• Miami TownshipPolice.
• Lakewood Police Dept..
CO OH
• Middletown Police Dept., ' Ashland Police Dept., OR
CT • Clackamas County Sheriff,
•Vestavia Hills Police Dept., OR
AL • Alachua County Sheriff, • Corvallis Police Dept.,OR
•'Grants Pass Police Dept..
FL
• Arizona DPS. AZ •Kissimmee Police Dept., OR
• Gilbert Police Dept., AZ FL •Keiser Police Dept.. OR
• Marana Police Dept., AZ •Martin County Sheriff. FL ' Medford Police Dept.,OR
•Oro Valley Police Dept.. AZ •Ocala Police Dept.. FL ' Oregon State Police,OR
• Sherwood Police Dept., OR
• Auburn Police Dept.. CA •Duluth Police Dept.. GA • Salem Police Dept., OR
• Azusa Police Dept.. CA •Yamhill County Sheriff.
• Berkley Police Dept.. CA . Honolulu Police Dept..HI OR
• California Highway Patrol,
CA
• Campbell Police Dept.. CA ' Ada County Sheriff. ID • South Carolina Highway
• Corona Police Dept.. CA ' Boise Police Dept.. ID Patrol. SC
• East Bay Regional Park
District, CA •Overland Park Police • Addison Police Dept., TX
•El Centro Police Dept., CA Dept..KS • Arlington Police Dept..TX
•Escondido Police Dept.. CA •
•Fountain Valley Police •Fayetteville Police Dept., • Coppell Police Dept..TX
Dept., CA NC •Dalworthington Police
• Fullerton Police Dept.. CA •High Point Police Dept., Dept.,TX
• Grover Beach Police Dept.. NC •Desoto Police Dept.,TX
CA •North Carolina Highway •Flower Mount Police
•Inglewood Police Dept., CA Patrol,NC Dept., TX
• Inland Valley Traffic, CA • Gurrola MC Escort
•La Quinta Police Dept.. CA . Atlantic City Police Dept., Service,TX
• Grover Beach Police Dept., NJ •Halton City,TX
CA •Montvale Police Dept.. NJ 'Mansfield Police Dept.,TX
• Inglewood Police Dept., CA . St. Barnabas Health Care
• Inland Valley Traffic. CA System.NJ •Pecan Hill Police Dept.,
• La Quinta Police Dept.. CA . Woodcliff Lake Police TX
•Newport Beach Police Dept.. Dept..NJ •Texas Motorcycle Escort.
CA TX
-- • Orange Police Dept.. CA
• Albuquerque Police Dept.,
• City of Poway. CA NM • Chesapeake Police Dept..
• San Jose Police Dept.. CA VA
• Farmington Police Dept..
• Santa Monica Police Dept.. NM • Henrico County Sheriff.
A
A
•Santa Rosa Police Dept.. CAN°Rancho Police Dept., V•Newport News, VA
•Roswell Police Dept.. NM • Spots}lvania County
• Simi Valley Police Dept., Sheriff. VA
CA • Virginia State Police, VA
•Bullhead City Police
http://jeff.dean.home.att.net/rt-p.htm 01/23/2001
BMW R11 OUR 1-Y Police Motorc)cie
• University of California- Dept.,NV . American Motor Escorts.
Santa Cruz. CA • Nevada Highway Patrol. WA
• Ventura Police Dept., CA NV •Bellevue Police Dept., WA
• Woodland Police Dept.. CA •Medical Lake Police Dept.,
•Woodbury Police Dept.. WA
NY •Mukilteo Police Dept., WA
•Broadview Heights Police .Renton Police Dept.,WA
Dept., OH •Washington State Patrol.
•Dublin Police Dept., OH WA
r. BMW R110ORT-P additional standard
equipment
The R1100RT-P includes standard equipment beyond that provided on the civilian
R1100RT motorcycle:
• Solo seat only with a radio top box replacing the passenger seat.
• Rear-drive gear ratio of 31:11 (civilian RT has 32:11 ratio but R1100RS has 31:11
ratio).
• Auxiliary cooling fan for when engine is kept running when the motorcycle is
stationary.
• Front and rear protection bars.
• A special speedometer accurate to± 1 MPH.
• Two 12-volt accessory outlets (the civilian R1100RT comes with one).
• Rear-only emergency flasher system in addition to the 4-way system.
• Headlight on-and-off switch.
• Heated handgrips are standard.
• True-image rear-view mirrors.
• Auxiliary linked battery to provide power for long duty.
• BMW "City Case" saddle bags (smaller than the standard bags).
• Police equipment: siren, front and rear strobe lights, etc.
4 BMW R1100RT-P Specifications
Engine
Type 2-cylinder 4-stroke boxer engine
Valves 4 per cylinder
Displacement 1085 cc
Bore x Stroke 99 x 70.5 mm
http://jeff.dean.home.att.net/rt-p.htm 01/23/2001
BMW R11 OUR 1-1' 1'ullCc
Horsepower rating 90 bhp @ 7,250 rpm
Torque rating 69 lb./ft @ 5,500 rpm
Compression ratio 10.7 : 1
Cooling system Thermostatically controlled oil cooler, auxiliary fan driven
Valve actuation High Cam, chain driven
Catalytic converter Three-way computer controlled converter with oxygen
sensor
Clutch Single plate, thy, cable actuation
Gearbox 5-speed
Gear ratios 1st - 4.16:1, 2nd - 2.91:1, 3rd - 2.13:1, 4th - 1.74:1, 5th -
1.45:1
Final drive ratio 2.81 : 1
Electrical System
Engine management Bosch Motronic MA version 2.2 combined fiiel/ignition
control
Generator Three-phase alternator 14V, 50A, 700 W
Batteries Two 12V 19 Ah (separate control for special vehicle
equipment) .
Dimensions and
Weight
Fuel tank capacity 6.8 US gallons including 1 gallon reserve
Seat height Three position adjustable - 30.7", 31.5", 32.3"
Curb weight w/fuel 622 lbs. (without official equipment)
GVWR 1080 lbs
Ergonomics
Front brake lever 4-positions -
Windshield Electronically adjustable / 22 degree angle (optional tall
shield available)
Seat 3-positions
Shift lever 2-positions
Handlebars 2-temperature heated handlebar grips
Chassis
Frame Cast aluminum frame, engine as stressed member, tubular
rear frame
Front wheel suspension BMW Telelever - with leading link anti-dive design
Rear wheel suspension BMW Paralever - load reversal technology
Front suspension strut Gas shock absorber
http://jeff.dean.home.att.net/rt-p.htm 01/23/2001
BMW R11U0K1-Y Police iviotorcycic
Rear suspension strut Gas shock absorber, adjustable rebound, and spring pre-
load adjustment
Front wheel brake Dual 4-piston, fixed calipers with floating disks
Rear wheel brake 2-piston, floating caliper with rigid disk
Wheels Tubeless tires on cast alloy wheels
Tires - front Cast alloy rim 127/80 - ZR 17 (tubeless)
Tires - rear Cast alloy rim 160/60 -ZR 18 (tubeless)
/��,y�ta POLICE
Click on the photograph above to see the new BMW R11 SORT!
Go to the "Dean" of BMW Motorcycle Web Sites!
20 January 2001
J
Counter started 1 January 2001
http://jefldean.home.att.net/rt-p.htm 01/23/2001
ATTACHMENT:
Public Safety Commission Minutes
January 17,2001
Item: Motorcycle Enforcement Proposal
Minutes
Public Safety Commission
January 17, 2001
B. REQUEST for approval of motorcycle enforcement proposal.
Rec: By Minute Motion, approve the request and recommend to
the City Council approval of same with funding provided
by CAL COPS Program or Office Of Traffic Safety (OTS)
grant money.
Lt. Thetford indicated the proposal is being presented to the
Commission at the request of Ms. Gilligan, with the department's
input and recommendation.
Lt. Thetford reviewed prior proposals and cost analysis. The major
issues include speed and light violations, and traffic. Motorcycles
have the ability, during major traffic collisions with gridlock, to
split traffic enabling the units to get to the scene quicker. Motors
are less visible in dealing with light and speed violations.
Motors are used within department in the cities of Rancho Mirage
and Moreno Valley. BMW offers the cutting edge in cycles with
an anti-locking brake system.
Positive issues in using motorcycles:
More mobile in congested areas
Smaller and less noticeable with increased traffic
enforcement capabilities
Able to maneuver in and out of traffic more easily
Effective for speed enforcement
Effective for targeting zones
Potential for generating revenue, however, not a Police
Department factor
1/17/01
3
Minutes
Public Safety Commission
January 17, 2001
Negative issues:
Officer more susceptible to injury
Image issue of motors lying in wait for enforcement
Financial considerations:
BMW has a buy-back program after 3 years and an
excellent maintenance program
Mandatory 2-week training school for officers
Two options relating to personnel costs: (1) Two new
positions, which is not endorsed; (2) Two positions from
the existing traffic team
Total cost for first year is $49,498; recurring costs include
personnel costs of$2288 plus motorcycle maintenance
Ms. Gilligan indicated that CAL COPS money is available,
as is a grant from OTS
A question was raised as to the ability to cancel the program if
there was a recommendation not to continue. Lt. Thetford
indicated that the program could be cancelled.
A question was asked if this issue is a revisit, and if the City of
Palm Desert had experience with motors.
Mayor Ferguson responded that the issue is a revisit. With
increased traffic complaints, some Councilmembers suggested that
this program be reconsidered. He stated that Palm Desert has not
had experience with motors.
Mayor Pro Tern Kelly indicated that the Council has been receiving
many complaints about speeding.
Commissioner Can asked if the Council had considered this
subject, and the answer was in the negative.
1/17/01
4
Minutes
Public Safety Commission
January 17, 2001
A question was asked if P.O.S.T. reimburses for job-specific
training, and if so, does the money go to the City or County? Lt.
Thetford will look into this.
There was discussion concerning the statistics from the City of
Rancho Mirage showing before and after implementation. Lt.
Thetford indicated that in a report from Lt. Kirby, speed citations
in Rancho Mirage were up at the beginning and down after the
program was in place. Traffic collisions along Highway 111 also
decreased.
Mr. Greenwood indicated that according to statistics he has seen,
speed-related collisions in Rancho Mirage decreased 70% from the
year before the program to the year after, and city-wide accidents
decreased 40-50% even though their motor enforcement primarily
focused on Highway 111. The motors had a tremendous impact.
Mayor Ferguson said that he believed the average speed on
Highway 111 dropped from 66 to 51 within 4 months after the
implementation of the motorcycle program.
Another question raised was whether the grant being considered
actually included motorcycle training and personnel salary for
several years. Since new officers would not be hired, would that
mean the grant could be used to pay the differential?
Lt. Thetford indicated that he believed there were grants available
to include a package with personnel, training and equipment. He is
not sure what the City has looked into regarding OTS grants. It is
likely it would cover the equipment and the training.
Mr. Greenwood indicated that included in the agenda is
information concerning OTS grants. The application deadline is
January 31. He indicated that the City does not rank very well on
the OTS safety index, the reason being that Palm Desert has a high
tourist and visitor population, and is ranked by vehicle miles
traveled and population. Our numbers aren't represented very
accurately. Palm Desert is classified as the third worst city in our
category for speed-related collisions in the state and the 30th worst
state-wide. If Palm Desert were to submit a grant application, they
would be hard-pressed to deny it.
1/17/01
5
Minutes
Public Safety Commission
January 17, 2001
There was discussion about alternatives to motors for reducing
speed-related accidents and speeding problems in our city.
Lt. Thetford indicated there are several alternatives. Critical
analysis is an important tool used by the traffic team. Motors are
another tool that can be used to deal with the problem and they
may have a significant impact, but are not the only way to resolve
the problem.
A suggestion was given to include the cost of hand-held radar
equipment. Lt. Thetford indicated a grant was recently received,
through City Council approval, for eight new radar guns and the
old equipment will be switched out.
There was concern expressed about the use of motors during the
summer months and during inclement weather. Lt. Thetford
indicated that during the summer, motorcycle officers work
evening hours. Motorcycle officers can be used as patrol officers
during bad weather, as is done in the City of Rancho Mirage.
A question arose concerning staffing, and Lt. Thetford indicated
that there would be 2 officers per day, 16 hours. Two existing
traffic team officers would be used for the motorcycle program,
and they would be staggered to enable maximum exposure. When
those two officers are off duty, there would not be motorcycle
patrol in the city.
There was discussion concerning using grant money to buy the
motors. If this is done, and there is a decision to discontinue the
program after a year, what happens to the equipment? Lt. Thetford
responded that it depends on the specifics of the grant. Lt.
Thetford indicated that CAL COPS money is available and if used,
the motorcycles would remain the City's property.
Motion by Commissioner Carr to table consideration of the
motorcycle program for 30 days and agendize it for the next
meeting. Motion did not receive a second.
Question was raised if CAL COPS money was restricted to
motorcycle enforcement, or if it could be used for other types of
traffic enforcement such as radar. Lt. Thetford said it is not
1/17/01
6
Minutes
Public Safety Commission
January 17, 2001
specific to motors. Any type of equipment can be purchased.
Personnel costs are not covered under CAL COPS program.
Ms. Gilligan indicated that one of the biggest public relations
concerns in the city is traffic. Having motors on the road would
make it look like the City is doing something. Staff is supportive
of the program on a trial basis, and the issue can be revisited at the
end of a year.
Lt. Thetford read the minutes from the last meeting where the item
was considered, which indicated the Sheriffs Department brought
it to the Commission with no opinion as to whether the city should
or should not go forward with the program. During the 12 years
motors have been in the department, one officer was killed in the
line of duty. Officer safety is important, and one consideration is
emergency braking. The BMW cycles have an anti-lock braking
system.
Motion by Commissioner Carr to table the item.
Mayor Pro Tem Kelly indicated that the decision should not be
driven by the grant. He feels speeding is a problem that has
escalated.
Mayor Ferguson agreed that the grant should not affect the
Commission's decision. The Commission should flush out the
issues on both sides and give the Council a fully informed decision.
There was discussion about using speed trailers to increase public
awareness in reducing speed.
Chairman Hagthrop asked if it was necessary for the Commission
to make a recommendation in order for the Council to consider the
proposal.
Mayor Ferguson said that although the Commission is not required
to make a recommendation, the Council would like to have a
recommendation from the Commission.
Mayor Pro Tem Kelly feels that if citizens see motorcycles, they
would feel that the City did something.
1/17/01
7
Minutes
Public Safety Commission
January 17, 2001
Lt. Thetford stated that he valued the input of the Commission, and
welcomed requests from the Commission on items for further
research. This Commission has the experience and ability to ask
the questions that may be asked from Council.
Chairman Hagthrop indicated that it has been moved and
seconded that the item be tabled for 30 days. Motion
unanimously carried.
There was discussion about the legal terminology of tabling an
item. If the item is tabled, it means no additional information is
requested and item is dead until brought back by the Commission.
Ms. Gilligan indicated that if the Commission tabled this item, it
would then be taken to the City Council with a report stating that
the Commission did not wish to make a recommendation and the
item was tabled indefinitely or until such time as a Commissioner
brought it forward again. It would then be up to the Council to
send it back asking the Commission to take a position, or the
Council could undertake the decision-making on their own.
The Commission discussed getting additional data on safety, and
suggested statistics from other communities would be helpful.
Commissioner Carr indicated that he would withdraw his motion to
table, with the agreement of the second. Commissioner Lebel
agreed.
Motion by Commissioner Carr to withdraw his motion to table,
second by Commissioner Lebel.
Motion by Commissioner Carr to continue item to next meeting,
second by Commissioner Lebel, unanimously carried.
C. CONSIDERATION of changing meeting date.
Rec: By Minute Motion, approve the recommendation to
change the meeting date from the third Wednesday
of the month to the second Wednesday of the
month.
1/17/01
8
ATTACHMENT:
Public Safety Commission Minutes
February 14, 2001
Item: Motorcycle Enforcement Proposal
Minutes
Public Safety Commission
February 14, 2001
Another question was raised as to when this would start. Lt. Thetford
indicated there a subcommittee is currently reviewing software and
logistical issues involving the three cities, with estimated completion in
April. This program is more advanced than what the County has.
CONTINUED
BUSINESS A. CONSIDERATION of proposed ordinance for false activations of
burglary and robbery alarms (nuisance alarms).
Rec: By Minute Motion, approve Ordinance and forward to City
Council for approval.
Ms. Gilligan indicated that it would be preferable to have the City
Attorney or Deputy City Attorney in attendance.
Chairman Hagthrop indicated the item would be continued to March
meeting.
B. REQUEST for approval of motorcycle enforcement proposal.
Rec: By Minute Motion, approve the request and recommend to the City
Council approval of same with funding provided by CAL COPS
Program or Office Of Traffic Safety(OTS) grant money.
Lt. Thetford provided the Commission with the updated proposal. In
response to the question about training and POST reimbursement, the City
and Station get very little back. At the request of the Commission, hand-
held radar and mounted radar for the motors are now included, with the
cost being $57,998. The other two issues discussed at the last meeting
were the effectiveness of motorcycles and survey relation to injuries of
motorcycle officers on duty. Lt. Thetford obtained the final report from
the City of Rancho Mirage on traffic safety, and it is attached to the new
report. DUI arrests went up 90%, fatal and injury traffic collisions went
down 24%. In addition, child safety seat awareness and seat belt
compliance were increased.
Concerning injury to officers, the Rancho Mirage traffic motors were
surveyed along with five motors from the Temecula Police Department,
five motors from the Palm Springs Police Department, and 286 motors
02/14/01
4
Minutes
Public Safety Commission
February 14, 2001
from the Los Angeles Police Department. In five years, there have been
no injuries in Rancho Mirage, Temecula or Palm Springs. There were 59
officers involved in collisions in Los Angeles (total collisions) of which
none were fatal, 3 were major, 23 visible, 12 complaints of pain and 21
non-injury. Lt. Thetford indicated that he respected the Commissions
concern for officer safety. In the Coachella Valley, statistics show that the
motors is a safe program and an excellent tool for the Department. This
program has been presented to the Project Area 4 Committee and the
Chamber of Commerce, with positive responses received. Lt. Thetford
feels it is too late to apply for the OTS grant. The pluses and minuses of
the grant were considered, and the negative was that it would commit the
City to a long-term agreement. If Cal Cops money is used, the equipment
becomes the property of the City of Palm Desert, and the motors could be
parked if that decision were to be made.
A question was raised as to how many officers would be selected and
trained. Lt. Thetford indicated there are currently ten on the traffic team,
and the initial goal is to roll two officers off the traffic team and get them
motor trained. Deployment will depend on statistical analysis. The initial
goal, once motors are approved, is to start a media blitz to let citizens
know that we have them. They will then be used during more visible
times and most likely in school zones because that is the biggest concern.
The entire traffic team is a flex team and they are moved where they are
needed. There is no set schedule.
A question was asked as to how the motors are used in Rancho Mirage. Lt.
Thetford indicated that their program characteristically works the two in
an area together. They have occasionally been staggered and used with
DUI programs. They are a flex team as well. There have been occasions
where one officer is on vacation or sick, but it doesn't keep the other
officer out.
A question was asked about using motors during bad weather. Lt. Thetford
indicated that when weather is bad, the officers use a patrol car.
Lt. Thetford mentioned that he is currently trying to get two of the older
semi-dedicated traffic cars turned in to get slick top cars. He is working
on every angle possible to deal with the traffic problem.
02/14/01
5
Minutes
Public Safety Commission
February 14, 2001
Commissioner Lebel indicated that he felt it was good that Palm Desert
now has a dedicated Lieutenant who can focus attention on some of the
issues discussed over the past couple of years and who spends quality time
preparing items for the Commission's review.
A question was raised with respect to becoming operational. With the
approval of the Commission and approval of City Council, what is the
projected turnaround time to become operational? Lt. Thetford has
contacted the Sergeant who runs the program in LaQuinta. They recently
purchased BMW motorcycles. It took them 2 months to come on line.
After Council consideration and with approval, the first priority is to
identify the officers, assign them to a school and work on the order for the
motorcycles, which are purchased through the Highway Patrol.
Motion by Commissioner Lebel to recommend approval of the
motorcycle enforcement program to the City Council, and request a one
year pilot program for analysis to determine effectiveness, seconded by
Commissioner Carr. Motion carried 4-1 with Chairman Hagthrop
opposing.
Not included in motion is funding, which the Commission felt should be
left to the discretion of the City Council. Lt. Thetford indicated there is
$100,000 in Cal Cops money that has to be spent prior to June 30, and this
money will be used for this purpose. Ms. Gilligan indicated that this is a
significant program and purchase, and will use about half of what remains
in the Cal Cops fund.
C. REPORT on speed limits posted in school zones.
Rec: Continue this item to the March meeting.
Chairman Hagthrop indicated that this item will be continued to the March
meeting.
REPORTS AND
REMARKS A. Update on City defibrillator program.
Chief McLaughlin distributed a statistical report to members, and
introduced Bruce Stumreiter, Paramedic Coordinator, who made a
02/14/01
6