HomeMy WebLinkAboutCUP 86-27 Six Unit Senior Housing Project r
•
CITY OF PALM DESERT
TRANSMITTAL LETTER
I. TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
II. REQUEST: Appeal of planning commission condition for the payment of
school impact fees for a six unit senior housing apartment
project.
III. APPLICANT: HARRY SCHMITZ
P.O. Box 3992 _
Palm Desert, CA 92261
IV. CASE NO: PP/CUP 86-27
PPP'ROVED BY CITY COUNCIL
V. DATE: August 14, 1986 ON -L\
VI. CONTENTS: VERIFIED BY.___ __
Original on MP with Clh Clerk's Office
A. Staff Recommendation
B. Discussion
C. Draft Resolution/Ordinance No.
D. Planning Commission minutes involving Case No. PP/CUP 86-27.
E. Planning Commission Resolution No. 1153.
F. Planning Commission staff report dated June 17, 1986.
G. Related maps and/or exhibits.
A. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt resolution of denial affirming planning commission decision.
B. DISCUSSION:
On June 17th the planning commission approved a precise plan and
conditional use permit for a six unit, age 62 minimum, senior apartment
project with the following condition.
8. Project shall pay school fees of $628 per unit
or as arranged with the Desert Sands Unified
School District.
All recent correspondence with the school district continues to indicate
that they want fees for all residential projects including those limited
to seniors.
Mr. Schmitz argues that since condition no. 6 limits occupants to age 62
and over, the project could not impact the public schools.
Prepared by' -� �\ /C- `i`—L"----
Reviewed and Approve by
RESOLUTION NO. 86-91
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA. DENYING AN APPEAL AND
AFFIRMING CONDITION NO. 8 OF PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 1153 RELATING TO SCHOOL IMPACT
FEES.
CASE NO: PP/CUP 86-27
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on
the 14th day of August, 1986 hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider an
appeal by HARRY SCHMITZ of planning commission condition no. 8, resolution no.
1153 requiring payment of school impact fees for a six unit senior apartment
project.
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testi-
mony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard,
said city council did find the following facts to exist to justify their
actions.
1 . Condition No. 8 requiring school impact fees for all residential
projects regardless of age restrictions is consistent with city
policy and analysis of potential impacts conducted by the Desert
Sands Unified School District.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Palm
Desert, California, as follows:
1 . That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the
findings of the council in this case.
2. That the appeal of condition no. 8, Planning Commission Resolution
No. 1153 is denied.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert
City Council . held on this day of , 1986 by the following vote, to
wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
RICHARD S. KELLY, Mayor
ATTEST:
SHEILA R. GILLIGAN, City Clerk
City of Palm Desert, California
MINUTES
PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION
JUNE 17, 1986
E. Case No. PP 86-24 - ROSENBLUM & PECK, Applicants
Request for approval of a negative declaration
of environmental impact and a precise plan for
an eight unit apartment project within the R-3
zone located on the north side of San Gorgonio
Way between Las Flores Avenue and Las Palmas
Avenue.
Mr. Drell outlined the salient points of the staff report and
recommended approval .
Vice Chairman Erwood opened the public testimony and asked the
applicant to address the commission.
MR. WENDEL VEITH, architect, concurred with staff's findings.
Vice Chairman Erwood asked if anyone present wished to speak in
FAVOR or OPPOSITION to the proposed. There being no one, the public
testimony was closed.
Action:
Moved by Commissioner Wood, seconded by Commissioner Downs adopting
the findings as presented by staff. Carried 4-0
Moved by Commissioner Wood, seconded by Commissioner Downs, adopting
Planning Commission Resolution No. 1152, approving PP 86-24, subject
to conditions. Carried 4-0
F. Case No. PP/CUP 86-27 - HARRY SCHMITZ, Applicant
Request for approval of a precise
plan/conditional use permit for a six unit
senior citizen apartment project located within
the R-3 Senior Overlay zone on the east side of
San Rafael , 300 feet north of San Gorgonio Way.
Mr. Drell gave an outline of the proposed project and indicated that
the main concern was with the parking area. He explained that the
architectural commission supported the use of shade trees rather than
any type of carport or garage for the shading of the parking spaces.
He noted that there was adequate space for three carports to be
added.
8
MINUTES
PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION
JUNE 17, 1986
Commissioner Downs noted that he had looked at this site and found
that the closest sewer hook up was approximately 350 feet away and
up hill from the site.
Vice Chairman Erwood opened the public testimony and asked the
applicant to address the commission.
MR. HARRY SCHMITZ, applicant , explained that the previous
property owner was allowed to go with septic tanks which the
water district approved at that time. He requested the use of
septic tanks for his project. He indicated that the architec-
tural commission felt that trees would provide adequate
protection for the parking spaces. He stated that the neighbors
around the site felt that project would enhance the area. He
asked if garages would be acceptable which would require a
variance. Mr. Schmitz questioned the need to pay school impact
fees since this was a senior project.
Vice Chairman Erwood asked if any one wished to speak in FAVOR or
OPPOSITION to the proposed project.
VALERIE HALL, apartment manager, explained that she managed the
apartment across the street from the proposed project and she
felt that the project would be an asset to the neighborhood.
Vice Chairman declared the public testimony closed.
Commissioner Richards questioned if there would be any future
extension of the sewers in this area. He felt that garages would be
acceptable.
Mr. Holtz indicated that there had been some discussion about
creating an assessment district to install sewer system and curb and
gutter together in that area.
Commissioner Richards felt that the applicant should be bound to
join any future assessment district in that area. He stated that he
did not feel trees would be acceptable for the purpose of shading
the parking area and noted that three carports is reasonable.
Commissioner Downs noted that a variance would not be required for
the three carports.
Mr. Drell explained that the school district has determined that all
developments must pay the school fee therefore, the city includes
this condition unless some other agreement is worked out between the
applicant and the school district.
9
MINUTES
PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION
JUNE 17, 1986
Action:
Moved by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner Downs
adopting the findings as presented by staff. Carried 4-0
Moved by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner Downs
adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 1153, approving PP/CUP
86-27 as amended, subject to conditions. Carried 4-0.
VIII . MISCELLANEOUS
A. REVIEW OF PC 4 ZONING
Action:
Moved by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner Downs
directing staff to prepare information on all available PC 4
land and present ideas and suggestions on how to address the
concerns of this zoning. Carried 4-0
IX. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
MR. SANDY BAUM, 45-800 Deep Canyon, Palm Desert, CA 92260, indicated
that it might be a good idea to have the city's Economic Development
Advisory Committee review the Santa Anita Development project for
advise and input.
Commission felt this was a good idea.
X. COMMENTS
None.
XI. ADJOURNMENT
Moved by Commissioner Downs, seconded by Commissioner hards to
adjourn the meeting at 4:05 p.m. Carr.' 4-0
\:" . •
RAMON A. DIAZ, Secr+tares)
ATTEST (�
ICHARD ERWOOD, Vice Chairman
/dlg
10
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1153
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A
PRECISE PLAN AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW
CONSTRUCTION OF A SIX UNIT SENIOR CITIZEN
APARTMENT PROJECT.
CASE NO: PP/CUP 86-27
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California,
did on the 17th day of June. 1986 hold a duly noticed public hearing to
consider a request by HARRY SCHMITZ for approval of a precise plan and
conditional use permit to allow construction of a six unit conventional senior
citizen apartment project on the east side of San Rafael Avenue, 300 feet
north of San Gorgonio Way.
WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City
of Palm Desert Procedures for Implementation of the California Environmental
Quality Act, Resolution No. 80-89", in that the director of community develop-
ment has determined that the project is a class 3 categorical exemption.
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testi-
mony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard,
said planning commission did find the following facts to exist to justify
their actions.
1 . The proposed use and design of the project is of similar intensity
and type as surrounding uses and will not depreciate values in the
vicinity.
2. The proposed project will not interfere with the use or enjoyment of
property in the vicinity by the occupants thereof for lawful
purposes.
3. The project will not endanger the public health, safety or general
welfare.
4. The project is consistent with the zoning ordinance, general plan
and specifically implements senior housing goals contained within
the housing element.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of
Palm Desert, California, as follows:
1 . That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the
findings of the commission in this case.
2. Precise Plan/Conditional Use Permit 86-27 on file in the department
of community development is hereby approved subject to attached
conditions.
•
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1153
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert
Planning Commission, held on this 17th day of June, 1986 by the following
vote, to wit:
AYES: DOWNS, RICHARDS, WOOD 8 ERWOOD
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: CRITES
ABSTAIN: NONE / i _
RICK ERWOOD, Vice Chairman
ATTEST
57
gr,a7/)(11.
RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary
Y
/dlg
2
•
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1153
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
CASE NO. PP/CUP 86-27
Department of Community Development:
1 . The development of the property shall conform substantially with exhibits
on file with the department of community development, as modified by the
following conditions.
2. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the
restrictions and limitations set forth herein which are in addition to
all municipal ordinances and state and federal statutes now in force, or
which hereafter may be in force.
3. Construction of a portion of said project shall commence within one year
from the date of final approval unless a time extension is granted, other-
wise said approval shall become null , void and of no effect whatsoever.
4. Prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contem-
plated by this approval , the applicant shall first obtain permits and/or
clearance from the following agencies:
Riverside County Department of Health
Palm Desert Architectural Commission
City Fire Marshal
Palm Desert Water and Services District
Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be
presented to the department of building and safety at the time of issuance
of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith.
5. Trash provisions shall be approved by applicable trash company and city
prior to issuance of building permit.
6. A deed restriction shall be added to the property limiting occupants to a
minimum age of 62 years. The city shall have the ability to audit the
property owner's rental records at any time to insure compliance.
7. Applicant shall provide a minimum of three covered parking spaces.
8. Project shall pay school fees of $628 per unit or as arranged with the
Desert Sands Unified School District.
3
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1153
Department of Public Works:
1 . Drainage and signalization fund fees, as required by city ordinance,
shall be paid prior to grading permit issuance.
2. Storm drain construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study by the
private engineer that is approved by the department of public works.
3. Full public improvements, including traffic safety lighting, as required
by ordinance and the director of public works, shall be installed in
accordance with city standards.
4. Improvement plans for water systems shall be approved by the respective
service districts with "as-built" plans submitted to the department of
public works prior to the project final .
5. Complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted, as
required by ordinance, to the city engineer for checking and approval
before construction of any improvements is commenced. The engineer shall
submit "as-built" plans prior to the acceptance of the improvements by the
city.
6. All private driveways and parking lots shall be inspected by the
engineering department and a standard inspection fee shall be paid
prior to grading permit issuance.
7. Landscaping maintenance on San Rafael Avenue shall be provided by the
property owner.
8. Complete grading plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required
by ordinance, to the city engineer for checking and approval prior to
issuance of any permits.
9. Dedication of five feet of right-of-way on San Rafael Avenue shall be
done prior to issuance of any permits and approval of plans.
10. Installation of six foot sidewalk on San Rafael Avenue.
11 . Offsite improvement plans to be approved by public works department and a
surety posted to guarantee the required offsite improvements prior to
grading permit issuance.
12. Installation of septic tanks and pits as approved by the department of
building and safety.
13. Size, number and location of driveways to public works specifications
with only two driveway approaches to be allowed to serve this property.
4
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1153
14. Applicant shall agree to participate in any future assessment districts
for the use of sewers.
City Fire Marshal :
1 . Install a water system capable of delivering 2500 GPM fire flow from any
fire hydrant for a 2 hour duration in addition to domestic supply. The
computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating
pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of
measurement.
2. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants so that no point of any
building is more than 250 feet from a fire hydrant measured along approved
vehicular travel ways.
a. exterior surface of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted
chrome yellow and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green.
b. curbs shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each
hydrant.
c. hydrants shall not be located closer than 25 feet to any building.
3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall furnish the
original and three copies of the water system plan to the fire marshal
for review. Upon approval , one copy will be sent to the building
department and the original will be returned to the developer.
4. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and
approved by the water company with the following certification: "I
certify that the design of the water system in PP 86-27 is in accordance
with the requirements prescribed by the fire marshal ".
5. Prior to delivery of combustible materials to the building site, the
required water system shall be installed, operating and delivering the
required flow.
6. Additional fire protection requirements may be necessary when the
applicant submits specific plans for consideration and approval .
/dlg
5
•
CITY OF PALM DESERT
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
STAFF REPORT
TO: Planning Commission
DATE: June 17, 1986
CASE NO: PP/CUP 86-27
REQUEST: Approval of a precise plan/conditional use permit to allow
construction of a six unit senior citizen apartment project
located within the R-3 Senior Overlay zone on the east side of
San Rafael Avenue, 300 feet north of San Gorgonio Way.
APPLICANT: HARRY SCHMITZ AL COOK
P.O. Box 3992 P.O. Box 480
Palm Desert, CA 92261 Palm Desert, CA 92261
I. BACKGROUND:
A. ADJACENT ZONING/LAND USE:
North: R-3 S.0./multi-family
South: R-3 S.O./multi-family
East: R-3 5.0./multi-family
West: R-3 5.0./single-family
B. PALMA VILLAGE SPECIFIC PLAN DESIGNATION:
High Density, Senior Housing
C. PROJECT DATA:
Project Ordinance Requirement
Lot 11 ,000 sq. ft.
Number of Units 6 studios 6 maximum
Unit Size 600 sq. ft. 450 sq. ft.
Building Height 13' 18' maximum
Age Minimum 62 62
Parking 6 spaces 6 spaces
Building Coverage 357. 50% maximum
Front Setback 30 feet 15' minimum
Interior 10 feet 10 feet
II . ANALYSIS:
The project complies with all basic standards of the R-3 and S.O. zones.
The S.O. zone allows a land intensity of 7.56 persons on the 11 ,000
square foot site. Using the 1 .25 per studio unit standard, the site
yields six units.
PP/CUP 86-27
The project was reviewed by the architectural commission on May 27 where
the preliminary approval was granted. The main issue of discussion
involved design of the parking lot. The senior overlay does not specify
how much of parking should be covered. The applicant is not proposing
any carports or garages and will be relying on 48" box specimen shade
trees to cover the parking area. There is sufficient room within the
front setback for three carports. Additional carports would require a
front setback variance. The architectural commission determined that the
shade trees could adequately cover the lot if the number and size of the
trees were increased. From a design perspective, the commission preferred
the trees over carports in this case.
Other than the age 62 limitation, there will be no rental control on
these units. The senior overlay rent limits only apply to projects ten
units or larger. The age 62 minimum will simply be a condition of the
precise plan and must be recorded as a deed restriction. Since no
development agreement is required final approval rest with the planning
commission.
III. FINDINGS:
1 . The proposed use and design of the project is of similar intensity
and type as surrounding uses and will not depreciate values in the
vicinity.
2. The proposed project will not interfere with the use or enjoyment of
property in the vicinity by the occupants thereof for lawful
purposes.
3. The project will not endanger the public health, safety or general
welfare.
4. The project is consistent with the zoning ordinance, general plan
and specifically implements senior housing goals contained within
the housing element.
IV. RECOMMENDATION:
Approve findings and adopt Planning Commission Resolution No.
approving PP/CUP 86-27 subject to conditions.
Prepared b ( --'L
\d Reviewed and Approved by `. / 4
/dig
2
r
Society of St. Paul JUN 4 1986
44-660 San Pablo CUNMUN TY oEPANTv u1
i;; Y OF PLIM I)f;::RT
Palm Desert, Calif.92260
May 24, 1986
City of Palm Desert
City Hall ll
a
Palm Desert, Calif.92260
Re: Case No.304 Mf
To whom it may concern,
We have reviewed plans for a 6 unit senior housing project
at 44-620 San Rafael , Palm Desert, just across the street from our
property and would support this application. We feel that the proposal
would be a benefit to our neighborhood.
Your truly,
Fr. Barnabas Hunt SSP
(_•; i
Mr. & Mrs. Don Fischlein .JUN 4 1986
73-304 Willow St. COMMUNITY DE,E:UPMENT DEPARTMENT
CITY OF PALM DESERT
Palm Desert, Calif. 92260
May 24, 1986
City of Palm Desert
City Hall
Palm Desert, Calif.92260
Re: Case No.304 MF
6 Unit Senior Apt.
44-620 San Rafael
Palm Desert
To Whom It May Concern:
We have reviewed the proposed apartment project plans and
support the application. We own apartments just immediately east of
the site and feel that this proposal would improve and enhance our
neighborhood.
Please feel free to contact us should you have any other
concerns with respect to our property as it relates to this development.
Very truly yours ,
OZC�
• .),-
t - f G$t�� o2' 3®I2040
O� d 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260
TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611
May 30, 1986
CITY OF PALM DESERT
LEGAL NOTICE
CASE NO. PP/CUP 86-27
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held before the Palm
Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by HARRY SCHMITZ for approval
of a precise plan/conditional use permit for a 6 unit senior citizen apartment
project located on the east side of San Rafael north of San Gorgonio Way, more
particularly described as:
Lot II Blk 6 Palma Village Unit #5
1 1-
J
— CAT ALIiA
R -2 ill
..
I
,
iiErail
1111111.11.
S Zl' R-3 I.
z - ,
w IQ i
Q _ Q• R � '
EI •I8 tcp 0� � �4 1p�.Q
C i(J) cn, Q O ' �
. ,,_ , _
3, 1
" 4 7.y •
Q - Co
..._3 (r) Ir z...- / t- '
v)
1
14000
_ R-3 R-I z I,
iiii
R•314) 1 - , 1 tea;
AL AS SA pit 0 DIZ.`
uL`i; S•,P Jc-is ) I9 - i , S. P. 1 I . � ' ! 1 ! 1 1 I ►Q
SAID public hearing will be held on Tuesday, June 17, 1986 at 2:00 p.m. In
the Council Chamber at the Palm Desert City Hall, 73-510 Fred Waring Drive,
Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all Interested persons are
Invited to attend and be heard. If you challenge the proposed actions In
court. you may be limited to raising only those Issues you or someone else
raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or In written
correspondence delivered to the city council (or planning commission) at, or
prior to, the public hearing.
PUBLISH: Desert Post RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary
June 6, 1986 Palm Desert Planning Commission
16/
CITY OF PALM DESERT l�
P.O.BOX 1977 TAC-����
1Li
PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92261
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *JIL* 1'3.86* * * * *
COMMUVIC T DEEVELLOPMENTDE DEPARTMENT
ERT
APPLICATION TO APPEAL DECISION OF THE '&-A NN i N 4 Cori M I- s r o N
pPRovet eoND/?rDrJ5
TO THE 1on1P.�8) ON CASE NO. PP/COP f6-2-7
RR'/ • SCHMr-rZ
Name of Appellant
P.D.B. 3992 �,y�� DESERT �i9 . 9226/- p99Z 3//-2V6r
Address I ' Phone
Appealing decision of (date of meeting) J u N E 1 7 1 q g/v
regarding application of (if same as Appellant, write "Same") "SA M E
for (description of application)_
WEPT, e� CommoNr7.1 I)e eto1MENT;
-- Cd BUD/770 ni 11)0.
-7AND obordfvEN7 cy CPA,AiTi v No. 627 AO/EAc /5 oeN.EO.
Reasons for Appeal: FQ,OJacT (6: 5T✓oro APts) 15 LIMs j Ep To
5CNro/ CITi2EN5 ,44E L2- 4.4 ouer. NONE d1c i/fC
OccvP4N7S N/'-L //YPifc r 72/6 DESERT 54"OS 5 moo l-
D/STRiCr j T46ize-FofE No PI/Ti6A iio /s NEe4"5sARy•
AN UNDdE eco ofrt c NARRs/!/f )+yULD RES'LT v/o#N pCCc/'4N73 o�
7'N/s T/2EA/ //O as/N4 PRo✓6c7-- 8Y
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY v 3Ti-y /NcA6.4s A)4 Rc-Nrs'
Date Appeal filed: /77--,P '
Fee Received: N.%Z' °= _
Public Hearing set for:
Sign ure of ppellant
Director of Environmental Services Date: 6—3O - 86
cc: Appellant
Department of Environmental Services
File
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
(Complete and distribute after Public Hearing)
COUNCIL ACTION
cc: Appellant
Dept./Environmental Services
City Clerk
Date:
CITY OF PALM DESERT
P. O. BOX 1977
PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92261
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
APPLICATION TO APPEAL DECISION OF THE V e-A N N I'G CO M off, 55l o N
/pPRo✓Ai- ccND/irDN5
TO THE.41)D. $1.8) ON CASE NO. PP ('Ue f 6 —z 7
11Agrz CHMr7Z.
Name of Appellant
Po.?, 3992 , �,q�rt J7ESEIL% C 4 . 92261- J99Z 3Phone 6f
Address
Appealing decision of (date of meeting) J u N E 17 1 ct gip - , _
regarding application of (if same as Appellant, write "Same") S,q Nt 6 //
for (description of application)
06Pi, 9+ CoMMcN,,r1 DEr)Et-o/MENT:
COAJD/TIOIV A}O. .#1
(AND eDorifQtEN7 .y coNAiT/oN No, 6)1, .10,EA1_ /5 pe-rt'.
Reasons for Appeal: P2.°JEcT S1(pro ,4'75) 15 LIMITED To
56mro2 eiTzEN$ ,4.4E ‘. 2.. 4.1.P Duer. NONE d/ 7,j
Occc'PANijg //!/��c T THE 17E5-EAT 54i"05 5C/{oo1..
Pi5YR1 C'TT TN6 6 oRE No M/Ti6A T70 ✓ /5 NEe.e"s.5-Ali7•
AN UNPvE tCo,vo$r c H4Rpsh//i NO4,4p RG`'SVLT v/°sA) OCtt/PAA1 5
Ti/s 5Aiwoie- ci /yo as/N4 PRGJ6cT BY
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY vv✓v s71 y (NCRt`'4c/11.14 RENTS
Date Appeal filed: /-ei)4
c-�
Fee Received: ..J.?" _
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1153
14. Applicant shall agree to participate in any future assessment districts
for the use of sewers.
City Fire Marshal :
1 . Install a water system capable of delivering 2500 GPM fire flow from any
fire hydrant for a 2 hour duration in addition to domestic supply. The
computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating
pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of
measurement.
2. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants so that no point of any
building is more than 250 feet from a fire hydrant measured along approved
vehicular travel ways.
a. exterior surface of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted
chrome yellow and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green.
b. curbs shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each
hydrant.
c. hydrants shall not be located closer than 25 feet to any building.
3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall furnish the
original and three copies of the water system plan to the fire marshal
for review. Upon approval , one copy will be sent to the building
department and the original will be returned to the developer.
4. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and
approved by the water company with the following certification: "I
certify that the design of the water system in PP 86-27 is in accordance
with the requirements prescribed by the fire marshal".
5. Prior to delivery of combustible materials to the building site, the
required water system shall be installed, operating and delivering the
required flow.
6. Additional fire protection requirements may be necessary when the
applicant submits specific plans for consideration and approval .
/dlg
5
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1153
Department of Public Works:
1 . Drainage and signalization fund fees, as required by city ordinance,
shall be paid prior to grading permit issuance.
2. Storm drain construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study by the
private engineer that is approved by the department of public works.
3. Full public improvements, including traffic safety lighting, as required
by ordinance and the director of public works, shall be installed in
accordance with city standards.
4. Improvement plans for water systems shall be approved by the respective
service districts with "as-built" plans submitted to the department of
public works prior to the project final .
5. Complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted, as
required by ordinance, to the city engineer for checking and approval
before construction of any improvements is commenced. The engineer shall
submit "as-built" plans prior to the acceptance of the improvements by the
city.
6. All private driveways and parking lots shall be inspected by the
engineering department and a standard inspection fee shall be paid
prior to grading permit issuance.
7. Landscaping maintenance on San Rafael Avenue shall be provided by the
property owner.
8. Complete grading plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required
by ordinance, to the city engineer for checking and approval prior to
issuance of any permits.
9. Dedication of five feet of right-of-way on San Rafael Avenue shall be
done prior to issuance of any permits and approval of plans.
10. Installation of six foot sidewalk on San Rafael Avenue.
11 . Offsite improvement plans to be approved by public works department and a
surety posted to guarantee the required offsite improvements prior to
grading permit issuance.
12. Installation of septic tanks and pits as approved by the department of
building and safety.
13. Size, number and location of driveways to public works specifications
with only two driveway approaches to be allowed to serve this property.
4
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1153
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
CASE NO. PP/CUP 86-27
Department of Community Development:
1 . The development of the property shall conform substantially with exhibits
on file with the department of community development, as modified by the
following conditions.
2. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the
restrictions and limitations set forth herein which are in addition to
all municipal ordinances and state and federal statutes now in force, or
which hereafter may be in force.
3. Construction of a portion of said project shall commence within one year
from the date of final approval unless a time extension is granted, other-
wise said approval shall become null , void and of no effect whatsoever.
4. Prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contem-
plated by this approval , the applicant shall first obtain permits and/or
clearance from the following agencies:
Riverside County Department of Health
Palm Desert Architectural Commission
. City Fire Marshal
Palm Desert Water and Services District
Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be
presented to the department of building and safety at the time of issuance
of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith.
5. Trash provisions shall be approved by applicable trash company and city
prior to issuance of building permit.
6.l A deed restriction shall be added to the property limiting occupants to a
minimum age of 62 years. The city shall have the ability to audit the
property owner's rental records at any time to insure compliance.
7. Applicant shall provide a minimum of three covered parking spaces.
�T�
8.( )''Project shall pay school fees of $628 per unit or as arranged with the
Desert Sands Unified School District.
3