Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutUpdate on Transfer Station Proposals • ............. CITY OF PALM DESERT I 4,/ \ I >-j Office of the Assistant City Manager • • Community Services Division of ••..•TF�aE3N°..•• Staff Report REQUEST: Update on Transfer Station Proposals SUBMITTED BY; Robert Kohn, Director of Special Programs. DATE: July 11, 2002 CONTENTS None Recommendation: Information only. Executive Summary: At a Study Session held on June 13, 2002, presentations were made on proposed solid waste transfer and processing facilities to serve the Coachella Valley. Presenting were: 1. BLT Enterprises, Inc. for a transfer station and Materials Recovery Facility (MRF) facility to be located in Palm Desert; 2. The County of Riverside for a transfer station facility to be located on County- owned land adjacent to Edom Hill; 3. Waste Management of the Desert/City of Cathedral City for a facility to be located on land owned by the Cathedral City in that city. Riverside County will be completing its proposal process and selecting a vendor for their facility during the month of August, 2002. Once that information is available to the City, staff will present a full report, including comparisons, and a recommendation to the City Council. It is anticipated that this report will be agendized in October .:ITY COUNCIL ACTION: APPROVED _ DENIED RECEIVED OTHER_IATinal Ar "1 MEETING DATE - AYES: !p ,� NOES: OYl Q ` _ ABSENT: cerplas ri ABSTAIN: A VERIFIED BY: Qp‹_ 1tI Original on File w -city Clerk's 0L ,_� , Background: The BLT facility, to be located in the City of Palm Desert, involves the concept of including a Materials Recovery Facility(MRF). This facility would be capable of handling most of the Valley's waste stream. The landfill disposal issue is open for negotiation at this time. Under its franchise agreement with Waste Management of the Desert (also the City of Palm Desert's franchisee), the City of Cathedral City can require WM to construct and operate a transfer facility; it has done so. The transfer station facility is proposed to be located adjacent to the Edom Hill Landfill on city-owned land. Although not directly addressed or required in the proposal, Waste Management would more than likely utilize a County landfill for disposal. The County of Riverside proposal involves County-owned land adjacent to Edom Hill. While a transfer station is proposed at this time, plans include future expansion to incorporate a "waste conversion" facility if feasible. Waste from this facility would be transferred to one of two County landfills. All proposals state an ability to meet the EDOM Hill Closure deadline of September, 2004. Suggested tipping fees run from $23.19/ton (without mandated fees) from the County of Riverside to slightly over$39/ton from BLT Enterprises, Inc. All of the tipping fee estimates are dependent on waste volumes and disposal costs (including transportation). Over the next two months, key decisions will be made in relation to these projects separate from any decision the City of Palm Desert may or may not make. Regardless of what project moves forward, staff is certain the project proponents will be contacting the City of Palm Desert for a commitment to direct their waste stream to the facility. With over 81,000/tons per year, solid waste can be a valuable commodity when negotiating contracts for collection, processing, and disposal. mit ed By: f (AN ) RO RT KOHN, irector/Speci rograms SHEILA R. GI IGA A M/Comm. Services Approved By: CA S ORTEGA, City Manager PAUL G SON, Director/Finance