HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity of Los Angeles - Illegal Immigrants miL -13-00)
CITY OF Los ANGELES
ELIAS MARTINEZ CALIFORNIA Office of
: City Clerk CITY CLERK
Council and Public Services
iG�+"1•
J. Michael Carey ••• Room 395,City Hall
Executive Officer 111111111,. t4. : Los Angeles,CA 90012
When making inquiries S' e,..
s Council File Information-(213)485-5703
relative to this matter General Information-(213)485-5705
refer to File No. •
'eADED. .••••
Pat Healy
9 4- 0 0 02-S 4 7 RICHARD J. RIORDAN Chief Legislative Assistant
MAYOR
C) CO
July 25 , 1994 < c
C) r—
rn N
Co RI
n
Cn
Honorable Richard Riordan, Mayor Cities in the Stat Ali
Chief Legislative Analyst of California
City Administrative Officer C)
City Attorney Counties in the St teo
Councilmember Hernandez of California
Councilmember Goldberg
Councilmember Ridley-Thomas Democratic and Republican
Councilmember Alatorre Nominees for Statewide Office
Councilmember Alarcon
RE: CITY OPPOSITION TO "SAVE OUR STATE" (SOS) INITIATIVE WHICH
WOULD DENY PUBLIC EDUCATION AND MOST GOVERNMENT FUNDED HEALTH
AND WELFARE BENEFITS TO' ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the attached Resolution was adopted by the
Los Angeles City Council at its meeting held July 19 , 1994 .
•
FL_Lore--\04 -
ELIAS MARTINEZ, CITY CLERK
cc: 8 Certified copies sentCppySgpu$meLtACTIQ1Lsentatives
APPROVED DENIED
bem RECEIVED OTHER '
,men0\940002.47 � , n I ry.r\_ C C Sit' 042 C Q-c
Mi.T.TINC DATE t
N(,
ABSENT: 1\�\P
ABSTAIN: �t
VERIFIED BY:
��a� TF�kI�Aeg wit City Clerk' s Office
AN EQUAL EMPLOYMENT Ckli6dIg1 YYT`1'S FFRIVATIVE 'ACTION EMPLOYER Recyclade and made from recycled waste Tejij
RESOLUTIO
5 I r �, _r i ram/ • ..'
WHEREAS
, immigration is ttOde'lliteCi�►6�t slgnificant and,politically volatile
7 ___facing California policy makers; and COU?1.41"-
J REG�� _ JUL 1 21994
WHEREAS, the "Save Our S e ("SOS") initiative seeks to scapegoat immigrants for
the economic and social woes facing California, in the midst of an election year; and
WHEREAS, the "SOS" measure proposes to "save" our state by the following:
1) banning undocumented children from public schools;
2) requiring public school teachers to report "suspected" undocumented children to
the Immigration & Naturalization Service (INS);
3) deny prenatal care to undocumented women;
4) require public health workers to report to the INS "suspected" undocumented
patients, including children receiving immunizations;
5) require local police to coordinate with INS in deporting undocumented persons
arrested for an offense;
6) various other punitive measures, which only duplicate existing restrictions or
violate state or federal constitutional or statutory law; and
WHEREAS, "SOS" proponents contend that immigrants come to California to receive
public benefits and services when, in fact, immigrants come for jobs, family reunification and
to flee persecution. Federal law already denies undocumented immigrants welfare or cash
assistance programs, including food stamps; and
WHEREAS, despite poverty rates among immigrants higher than the average, immigrants
use fewer public benefits and are less likely than native-born residents to become dependent on
welfare, according to the California Senate Office of Research and data from the INS; and
WHEREAS, contrary to "SOS" propaganda, immigrants cannot be blamed for the
Savings & Loan Bail-Out, and the billions it has cost taxpayers because of conspicuous
consumption and over-speculation or the Defense Industry cut-backs, and the subsequent lay-offs
that have burdened the local economy. According to a study by the Urban Institute, immigrants
in California contribute $30 billion in taxes, while receiving barely half that amount in
government services; and
WHEREAS, "SOS" proponents ignore LAPD's "Special Order 40", and policies adopted
by other law enforcement agencies, that already formalize cooperation between local
governments and INS when undocumented persons are arrested for multiple misdemeanor
offenses, high grade misdemeanors or felony offenses. Computer-networked booking systems,
throughout the state, effectively report all suspected undocumented arrestees to the INS; and
WHEREAS, "SOS", aside from duplicating already-existing law enforcement practices,
also would raise serious legal issues by removing the requirement of "reasonableness" to any
arrest -- a basic constitutional protection against arbitrary government action; and
WHEREAS, while studies have indicated that less than 10 percent of the Latino
community in California is undocumented, "SOS" creates a cloud of suspicion -- and places the
burden of proof -- on all Latinos to prove their legality, despite a heritage of contributions,
history and valor in the Golden State; and
.
WHEREAS, the_ _,ith Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals' ruts... this year in Gonzalez-Rivera
v. INS that a stop based on race, or ethnic appearance, is an egregious Constitutional violation;
the Court commented: "[W]e should not allow our courts to be used to sanction racism in any
form"; "SOS" would put the state at odds with the Court of Appeals' ruling; and
WHEREAS, in clear violation of the State Constitution and a 1982 U.S. Supreme Court
decision (Plyler v. Doe), "SOS" would restrict undocumented persons from public schools,
requiring school officials to report any pupil or parent suspected of being undocumented. "SOS"
jeopardizes California's share of federal education funds by violating provisions of the federal
Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA), which prohibits the release of information
about public school students; and
WHEREAS, at the same time "SOS" proposes to "save" our state, it also proposes to
further drain local governments and schools of scarce funding through additional mandates with
no funding; scarce tax dollars would be earmarked to create new bureaucratic systems to verify
the "residency" of all Californians in a comprehensive illegal alien "witch-hunt" instead of using
the same monies for educating our young people or putting more police on our streets; and
WHEREAS, the history of the United States of America is one of immigration, men,
women and children, of diverse cultures, backgrounds and beliefs, coming to this country in
search of opportunity and a better life; and
WHEREAS, policy makers should seek a responsible dialogue and debate on immigration
issues that places a greater emphasis on servicing political asylum cases, legal residency and
citizenship cases to accurately determine status; the development of tracking systems for all
points of entry into this country; and deportation of all undocumented persons convicted of
felony crimes; and
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Los Angeles opposes the so-
called "Save Our State" Initiative; and be it
FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City of Los Angeles seeks a responsible dialogue on
the immigration issue including a greater emphasis on servicing political asylum cases, legal
residency and citizenship cases to accurately determine status; development of tracking systems
for all points of entry into this country; and deportation of undocumented persons convicted of
felony crime; and be it
FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Clerk be instructed to transmit a copy of this
resolution to every city and county in the State of Califor is and the Democratic and Republican
nominees for statewide office. /
PE30L RESENTED B rF / ' ''' ''''
MIKE HERNANDEZ
ADOPTEDCouncilmember, First District
JUL 19 9S4 SECONDED BY: I t�:� ,., , i
July 12,LOWANGELES CITY COUNCIL