HomeMy WebLinkAboutRes 00-14 through 00-16 Formatiion of Sandpiper Court LL AD N T E R
MEMO,,,„1 . A,
° 9`3''' OF FICE
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Richard J. Folkers,ACM/Director of Public Works
SUBJECT: FORMATION OF SANDPIPER COURT LANDSCAPE & LIGHTING
DISTRICT
DATE: February 10, 2000
RECOMMENDATION:
Waive further reading and adopt:
1. Resolution No. 00-14 initiating proceedings for the formation of the
Sandpiper Court Landscaping and Lighting District; the concurrent annexation of
said district and territory into the Palm Desert Consolidated Landscaping and
Lighting District; and the levy and collection of annual assessments related thereto
commencing with Fiscal Year 2000-2001.
2. Resolution No. 00-15 for preliminary approval of the engineer's report
regarding the formation of the Sandpiper Court Landscaping and Lighting District;
the concurrent annexation of said territory into the Palm Desert Consolidated
Landscaping and Lighting District;and the levy and collection of annual assessments
related thereto commencing with Fiscal Year 2000-2001.
3. Resolution No. 00-16 declaring the intention to form the Sandpiper Court
Landscape and Lighting District; and concurrently annex said district and territory
into the Palm Desert Consolidated Landscaping and Lighting district;and to levy and
collect annual assessments related thereto commencing with Fiscal Year 2000-2001;
and calling a property owner protest proceeding to submit to the qualified property
owners the question of levying such assessments and establishing an assessment
range formula for said district.
BACKGROUND:
The developer of the Sandpiper Court subdivision was required to form the necessary landscaping
and lighting assessment district. The formation report,diagrams,resolutions and related work was
accomplished by MuniFinancial who administers the City's consolidated district.
RESOLUTION NO. 00-14
00-15
00-16
FORMATION OF SANDPIPER COURT LANDSCAPE &LIGHTING DISTRICT
Page 2
February 10, 2000
The attached resolutions initiate the formal process to establish the district and allow the property
owner(s)to vote on the formation. Presently,the developer is the sole owner of all property and will
vote on the formation. To meet all legal requirements the following meetings are established by
resolution:
Public Hearing - April 13, 2000
Public Works staff recommends the City Council adopt the resolutions to initiate the district
formation.
J. FO RS, P.E. IEWED AND CO UR
CITY MANAGER
RJF/TGB/sd
Attachments RE IEWED AND CONCUR
FINANCE DIRECTOR
CITY COUNCIL CTION:
APPROVED DENIED
RECEIVED OTHER
MEETING DATE - /C'-C)
AYES: (,'�� a ��,� �i►^ocine J d�
NOES: L4 .) d' ���� '��
7BSENT:— 4 _ o
ABSTAIN:
VERIFIED BY:
Cr. or.. .'•.le with City 1er_k's Offl.ce
HAsdelafuente\My Documents\Staff Reports\LL District-Sandpiper Court
CITY OF PALM DESERT
ENGINEER'S REPORT
SANDPIPER COURT LANDSCAPING AND
LIGHTING DISTRICT FORMATION
Fiscal Year 2000/2001
I
f f��•�.� i
k Agla
,,f
Intent Meeting: February 10, 2000
Public Hearing: April 13, 2000
MuniFinancial
Corporate Office Regional Offices
28765 Single Oak Drive • Jacksonville,FL
Suite 200 • Kansas City,MO
Temecula, CA 92590 • Oakland,CA
Tel: (909) 699-3990 • Phoenix,AZ
Tel: (800)755-MUNI(6864) • Sacramento, CA
Fax: (909) 699-3460 • Seattle,WA
www.muni.com • Washington,DC
• ♦ Whittier, CA
ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT
Sandpiper Court Landscaping and Lighting District
City of Palm Desert
Riverside County, State of California
This Report and the enclosed diagrams showing the exterior boundaries of the District; any
relevant zones therein; and the lines and dimensions of each lot, parcel, and subdivision of
land within said District, as the same existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of
Intention. Reference is hereby made to the Riverside County Assessor's maps for a detailed
description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned
respectfully submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council.
s>
Dated this =I ' day of '3.'N u A rz , 2000.
MuniFinancial
Assessment Engineer
City of Palm Desert
By:
Jim .Guire
Manager, Special District Services
NO.16742
By: * Exp.G•30 0
Richard Kopecky dq ttiwk o���
R. C. E. # 16742 4'0FCM5
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. OVERVIEW 1
A. INTRODUCTION 1
B. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE DISTRICT 2
II. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 3
A. DESCRIPTION OF THE DISTRICT 3
B. DISTRICT IMPROVEMENTS AND SERVICES 4
IMPROVEMENTS AND SERVICES PROVIDED 4
LOCATION AND EXTENT OF IMPROVEMENTS 5
III. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT 6
A. IMPROVEMENT BENEFIT FINDINGS 6
GENERAL BENEFITS 6
SPECIAL BENEFITS 7
B. APPORTIONMENT CALCULATIONS 8
C. ASSESSMENT RANGE FORMULA 9
IV. DISTRICT BUDGET 12
A. DESCRIPTION OF BUDGET ITEMS 12
DIRECT COSTS 12
ADMINISTRATION COSTS 13
LEVY BREAKDOWN 14
DISTRICT STATISTICS 15
GENERAL INFORMATION 16
B. DISTRICT BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2000/2001 18
APPENDIX A - DISTRICT DIAGRAMS 19
APPENDIX B -ASSESSMENT ROLL 23
Engineer's Report
Sandpiper Cou adscaping and Lighting District
OVERVIEW
A. INTRODUCTION
The City of Palm Desert ("City") proposes to form the Sandpiper Court
Landscaping and Lighting District ("District") for Fiscal Year 2000/2001.
The City Council on behalf of the City proposes to levy and collect special
assessments on the County tax rolls to provide funding for the costs and
expenses required for on-going maintenance of the landscaping and lighting
improvements within the District. All improvements associated with the
District have been installed as part of the development of the properties
within the District. Upon successful formation of the District and approval
of the assessments, the territory within the District will be concurrently
annexed into the existing Palm Desert Consolidated Landscaping and
Lighting District ("Consolidated District") as a new sub-zone within Zone 6
(Hovley Lane). The District will be formed, annexed into the Consolidated
District, and levied pursuant to the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972,Part 2
of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code (the Act), and in
compliance with the substantive and procedural requirements of the
California Constitution Article MED.
This Engineer's Report ("Report") describes the District and assessments to
be levied against properties within the District commencing with Fiscal Year
2000/2001. The assessments described herein are based on the estimated cost
to maintain the improvements that will provide a direct and special benefit
to properties within the District. All improvements to be maintained and
funded through annual assessments were constructed and installed in
connection with the development of these properties. The annual costs and
assessments described herein include all estimated direct expenditures,
incidental expenses, deficits, surpluses, revenues, and reserves associated with
the maintenance and servicing of the improvements. Each parcel shall be
assessed proportionately for only those improvements provided and for
which the parcel receives special benefit.
The word "parcel," for the purposes of this Report, refers to an individual
property assigned its own Assessment Number by the County of Riverside
Assessor's Office. The County of Riverside Auditor/Controller uses
Assessment Numbers and specific Fund Numbers to identify properties
assessed on the tax roll for special district benefit assessments.
At a noticed Public Hearing, the City Council will consider all public
comments and written protests presented. Upon conclusion of the Public
MuniFinancial Page 1
Engineer's Report
Sandpiper Cou; idscaping and Lighting District
Hearing, the City Council will tabulate property owner protest ballots
received to determine whether majority protest exists, and by resolution
confirm the results of the protest ballot tabulation. Proceedings for the
formation of the assessment district shall be abandoned if majority protest
exists. If tabulation of the property owner protest ballots indicates approval
of the assessments and the assessment range formula presented, by resolution
the City Council will approve the Engineer's Report as submitted or
amended (amendments may not increase the assessments approved by the
property owner balloting procedure). Following approval of the Report, the
City Council will by resolution, order the formation of the District, the
annexation of the territory into the Consolidated District, and confirm the
levy and collection of assessments pursuant to the Act. In such case, the
assessments as approved may be submitted to the Riverside County
Auditor/Controller to be included on the property tax roll for each parcel
for Fiscal Year 2000/2001, or reviewed and confirmed at the annual public
hearing for the Consolidated District.
B. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE DISTRICT
The District consists of all lots and parcels within Tract 27370-00 known as
the Sandpiper Court. Tract 27370-00 is a single-family residential
development located on Sandpiper Court, south of Hovley Lane West
between Monterey Avenue, and Portola Avenue within the City of Palm
Desert.
The assessable parcels within the District (Sixteen single-family residential
lots) receive special benefit from the installation and maintenance of street
lighting facilities and landscaped areas within or adjacent to the
development, installed as part of the development and subdivision of the
original undeveloped property. The improvements have been installed by
the developer as part of the development plan and the District is being
formed to ensure and preserve the on going maintenance and operation of
these improvements. The improvements include parkway landscaping along
Hovley Lane West on the perimeter of the development including a masonry
wall and entryway monument, a landscaped retention basin area located at
the south end of the development and a single street light installed at the
entrance to the development. The specific location, description and benefits
of the improvements are discussed in the following sections.
MuniFinancial Page 2
Engineer's Report
Sandpiper Cou ndscaping and Lighting District
II. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
A. DESCRIPTION OF THE DISTRICT
The District consists of all lots and parcels located within the residential
development known as the Sandpiper Court (Tract 27370-00). The District is
generally located east of Monterey Avenue, south of Hovley Lane West,
west of Portola Avenue and incorporates all the single-family residential
parcels of Tract 27370-00 located on Sandpiper Court.
The District boundary includes all lots within Tract 27370-00 described as:
• Sixteen (16) subdivided single-family residential lots (Lots 1-16) on
Sandpiper Court totaling approximately 3.52 acres;
• Two landscape right-of-ways/easements (Parkway landscape areas)
adjacent to the development on the south side of Hovley Lane West,
identified as Lot "C" (0.02 acres) and Lot "D" (0.02 acres);
• The landscaped improvements associated with retention basin area
located at the end of Sandpiper Court, the south end of the District and
identified as Lot "E" (0.15 acres);
• Two lots identified as portions of the street right-of ways identified as
Lot "A" — portion of Hovley Lane West (0.08 acres) and Lot "B" —
Sandpiper Court (0.68 acres).
Refer to the Assessment Diagram for details of the District boundary.
The improvements that provide a special benefit to properties within the
District generally include, but are not limited to:
• Parkway and perimeter landscaping adjacent to the development on the
south side of Hovley Lane West;
• Landscaping associated with the retention basin area at the south end of
Sandpiper Court;
• Street Lighting located at the entrance to the development at the corner
of Hovley Lane West and Sandpiper Court;
• Entryway monument, blockwalls, irrigation systems, drainage systems
and electrical facilities associated with the landscaping and lighting
improvements identified above.
The estimated annual cost to provide and maintain the improvements within
the District have been allocated to each property in proportion to special
MuniFinancial Page 3
Engineer's Report
Sandpiper Cou idscaping and Lighting District
benefits received. The Method of Apportionment described in this Report
utilizes commonly accepted assessment engineering practices and have been
established pursuant to the 1972 Act and the provisions of the California
Constitution Article XIIID (Proposition 218).
B. DISTRICT IMPROVEMENTS AND SERVICES
IMPROVEMENTS AND SERVICES PROVIDED
As generally defined by the 1972 Act and applicable to this District,
improvements and the associated assessments may include one or any
combination of the following:
1) The installation or planting of landscaping;
2) The installation or construction of statuary, fountains, and other
ornamental structures and facilities;
3) The installation or construction of public lighting facilities, including,
but not limited to, street lights and traffic signals;
4) The installation or construction of any facilities which are appurtenant
to any of the foregoing or which are necessary or convenient for the
maintenance or servicing thereof;
5) The maintenance or servicing, or both, of any of the foregoing including
the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual
maintenance, operation, and servicing of any improvement, including,
but not limited to:
a) Repair, removal, or replacement of all or any part of any
improvements;
b) Grading, clearing, removal of debris, the installation, repair or
construction of curbs, gutters, walls, sidewalks, or paving, or water,
irrigation, drainage, or electrical facilities;
c) Providing for the life, growth, health, and beauty of landscaping,
including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing, or
treating for disease or injury;
d) The removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris, and other solid waste;
e) The cleaning, sandblasting, and painting of walls and other
improvements to remove or cover graffiti.
f) Electric current or energy, gas, or other agent for the lighting or
operation of any other improvements.
MuniFinancial Page 4
Engineer's Report
Sandpiper Cot___ ndscaping and Lighting District
g) Water for the irrigation of any landscaping, the operation of any
fountains, or the maintenance of any other improvements.
6) Incidental expenses associated with the improvements including, but not
limited to:
a) The cost of preparation of the report, including plans, specifications,
estimates, diagram, and assessment;
b) The costs of printing, advertising, and the publishing, posting and
mailing of notices;
c) Compensation payable to the County for collection of assessments;
d) Compensation of any engineer or attorney employed to render
services;
e) Any other expenses incidental to the construction, installation, or
maintenance and servicing of the improvements; and,
f) Costs associated with any elections held for the approval of a new or
increased assessment.
LOCATION AND EXTENT OF IMPROVEMENTS
The purpose of the District is to ensure the on going maintenance, operation
and servicing of local landscaping and lighting improvements installed as a
result of property development.
The landscape improvements may include but are not limited to all material
and facilities within the District including ground cover, shrubs, trees and
plants; irrigation and drainage systems; ornamental lighting structures,
masonry walls or other fencing, entryway monument, and associated
appurtenant facilities located within the following areas:
• Parkway and perimeter landscaping adjacent to the development on the
south side of Hovley Lane West, identified as Lots "C" and "D" (0.04
acres) on Tract Map No. 29045.
• Landscaping associated with the dry well retention basin on the south
end of development (Sandpiper Court), identified as Lot "E" (0.15 acres)
on Tract Map No. 29045.
The street lighting improvements may include but are not limited to all
material, facilities and electric current necessary to provide street lighting
within the District in the following locations:
• A single streetlight is located at the entrance to the development at the
corner of Hovley Lane West and Sandpiper Court.
MuniFinancial Page 5
Engineer's Report
Sandpiper Col indscaping and Lighting District
III. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT
Pursuant to the 1972 Act the costs (assessments) of the District are apportioned by a
formula or method that fairly distributes the net amount to be assessed among all
parcels in proportion to benefits received from the improvements. Furthermore, the
provisions of Article XIIID of the California Constitution (Proposition 218) require
the agency to separate the general benefit from special benefit, whereas only special
benefits may be assessed.
A. IMPROVEMENT BENEFIT FINDINGS
The annual assessment outlined in the Budget section of this Report is
proposed to cover the estimated annual cost to provide all necessary service,
operation, administration, and maintenance required to keep the landscaping
and lighting improvements in a healthy, vigorous, and satisfactory condition.
It has been determined that each assessable parcel within the District receives
similar and proportional special benefits from the improvements. The fact
that all proposed improvements are part of the overall property
development plan within the District, and each parcel's close and relatively
similar proximity to the improvements makes each parcel's special benefit
from the improvements similar and proportionate. All the lots and parcels
that receive special benefit from the improvements are included within the
District and shall be assessed for the improvements.
GENERAL BENEFITS
The improvements associated with this District are a direct result of
property development within the District and would otherwise not be
required or necessary. Developers typically install local improvements to
enhance the marketability and value of properties within the development
and/or as conditions of development. In either case, the improvements are
clearly installed for the benefit of the properties being developed and not for
the benefit of surrounding properties. Although local improvements (by
virtue of their location), may be visible to surrounding properties, any
benefit to surrounding properties is incidental and can not be considered a
direct and special benefit. Furthermore, most developments within the City
typically have various landscaping and lighting improvements specifically
associated with their development and these improvements are funded by
properties within those developments. Therefore, it has been determined
that the District improvements and the on-going operation and maintenance
of those improvements provide no identifiable or measurable general benefit
to properties outside the District or to the public at large.
MuniFinancial Page 6
Engineer's Report
Sandpiper Cou____ndscaping and Lighting District
SPECIAL BENEFITS
All the improvements funded through the District provide a special aesthetic
value to each property and enhance the quality of life for property owners
within the District. All the improvements associated with the District are
part of the overall development plan for these properties and were
specifically installed for the benefit and development of the properties.
The special benefits associated with parkway, perimeter, entryway, and
other specified landscaped areas and associated amenities are specifically:
1. Enhanced desirability of properties through association with the
improvements.
2. Improved aesthetic appeal of properties by providing a positive
representation of the development and properties within the District.
3. Enhanced adaptation of the urban environment within the natural
environment from adequate green space and landscaping.
4. Environmental enhancement through improved erosion resistance,
dust and debris control and reduced noise and air pollution.
5. Increased sense of pride in property ownership resulting from well-
maintained improvements associated with the properties.
6. Reduced vandalism and criminal activity resulting from well-
maintained surroundings and amenities.
7. The special enhancements to the value of property which results
from the above benefits.
The special benefits of street lighting are the convenience, safety, and
security of property, improvements, and goods. Specifically:
1. Enhanced deterrence of crime and the aid to police protection.
2. Increased nighttime safety on streets through enhanced visibility.
3. Improved sense of security and safety for pedestrians, motorists and
property owners.
4. Improved ingress and egress to property.
5. Reduced vandalism, other criminal acts and damage to improvements
or property.
6. Reduced personal property loss.
7. The special enhancement to the value of property which results from
the above benefits.
MuniFinancial Page 7
Engineer's Report
Sandpiper Co'____andscaping and Lighting District
B. APPORTIONMENT CALCULATIONS
The assessments outlined in this section represent the proportionate special
benefit to each property within the District and the basis of calculating each
parcel's proportionate share of the annual costs associated with the District
improvements. The costs associated with the maintenance and operation of
all District improvements shall be collected through annual assessments from
each parcel receiving special benefit. The funds collected shall be dispersed
and used for only the services and operation provided to the District.
The basis of determining each parcel's special benefit utilizes a weighting
formula commonly known as an Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). The
single-family residential lot (parcel) is used as the base unit for calculation of
assessments and is defined as one (1.00) EDU. All other property types are
typically assigned an EDU that reflects their proportional special benefit
from the improvements as compared to the single-family residential lot
(weighted comparison).
Parcels that will not be developed such as sliver parcels, dedicated easements,
open space areas, dedicated landscaped areas or common areas and properties
not designated by a County Assessor's Parcel Number (APN) such as streets,
utility easements or rights-of-way receive no special benefit and are
considered Exempt. These Exempt properties are not assessed for District
improvements. If any Exempt property within the District is designated by
the County with a specific APN, that parcel shall be assigned 0.00 EDU.
Any property that is identified as non-taxable by the County Assessor's
Office such as government owned or utility owned property is not exempt
from District assessments unless:
• The property has restricted development or limited land use potential
that makes the installation and maintenance of the improvements clearly
of no benefit to the property; or
• The property provides additional or substantially similar improvements
being provided by the District (such is the case with parks and open
space areas or possibly schools and common areas).
In the Sandpiper Court Landscaping and Lighting District, all parcels have
been identified as either single-family residential parcel (subdivided
residential lots) or Exempt. All the single-family residential parcels benefit
from the improvements and shall proportionately share in the cost of
maintaining the improvements. It has been determined that each residential
parcel receives equal special benefit from all the improvements. Therefore,
the most equitable and reasonable apportionment of benefit is an equal (per
MuniFinancial Page 8
Engineer's Report
Sandpiper Co,..,..andscaping and Lighting District
parcel) distribution of costs, regardless of the parcel's acreage or development
status.
The annual assessment for all assessable parcels is calculated by the following
formula:
Total Balance to Levy / Total Parcels = Parcel Levy Amount
Refer to the District Budget for a breakdown of the annual budget and
assessments.
C. ASSESSMENT RANGE FORMULA
Any new or increase in assessments require certain noticing and meeting
requirements by law. Prior to the passage of Proposition 218, legislative
changes in the Brown Act defined the definition of "new or increased
assessment" to exclude certain conditions. These conditions included "any
assessment that does not exceed an assessment formula or range of
assessments previously adopted by the agency or approved by the voters in
the area where the assessment is imposed." This definition and conditions
were later confirmed through Senate Bill 919 (SB919 is the implementing
legislation for Proposition 218).
The purpose of establishing an assessment range formula is to provide for
reasonable increases and inflationary adjustment to annual assessments
without requiring costly noticing and mailing procedures, which could add
to the District costs and assessments. As part of the District formation,
balloting of property owners is required, pursuant to Proposition 218. The
property owner ballots included an Assessment to be approved, as well as
the approval of an assessment range formula.
The assessment range formula shall be applied to all future assessments
within the District. Generally, if the proposed annual assessment (levy per
unit or rate) for the current fiscal year is less than or equals to the
"Maximum Assessment" (or "Adjusted Maximum Assessment"), then the
proposed annual assessment is not considered an increased assessment. The
Maximum Assessment is equal to the initial Assessment approved by
property owners adjusted annually by the following criteria:
1. Beginning in the second fiscal year and each fiscal year thereafter, the
Maximum Assessment will be calculated.
MuniFinancial Page 9
Engineer's Report
Sandpiper Coui Landscaping and Lighting District
2. The new Adjusted Maximum Assessment for the year represents the
prior year's approved Maximum Assessment adjusted by the greater of:
(a) Three percent (3.0%); or,
(b) The annual increase in the Consumer Price Index (CPI).
Each year the City shall compute the annual increase in the CPI. The
increase in CPI is the percentage difference between the CPI on January 1, of
the current year and the CPI for the previous January 1 (or for a similar
period of time) as provided and established by the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
This percentage difference (annual difference) shall then establish the allowed
increase based on CPI. The Consumer Price Index used shall be based on the
CPI established by the Bureau of Labor Statistics for all urban consumers for
the Los Angeles, Anaheim, and Riverside Area. Should the Bureau of Labor
Statistics revise such index or discontinue the preparation of such index, the
City shall use the revised index or comparable system as approved by the
City Council for determining fluctuations in the cost of living.
If CPI is less than three percent (3.0%), then the allowable adjustment to the
Maximum Assessment is three percent. If CPI is greater than three percent
(3.0%), than the allowable adjustment to the Maximum Assessment is based
on CPI. The Maximum Assessment is adjusted annually and is calculated
independent of the District's annual budget and proposed annual assessment.
Any proposed annual assessment (rate per levy unit) less than or equal to this
Maximum Assessment is not considered an increased assessment, even if the
proposed assessment is greater than the assessment applied in the prior fiscal
year.
The following table illustrates how the assessment range formula is applied.
Examples of Percentage Increases
CPI Calculated Maximum% Prior Years Allowed Allowed New
Percentage Standard 3 Increase Without Re Maximum Rate Adjustment Maximum Rate
Example Increase %Increase Balloting Per EDU Per EDU Per EDU
1 5.25% 3.00% 5.25% 323.200 16.968 340.17
2 1.00% 3.00% 3.00% 323.200 9.696 332.90
• Example 1 — If the percentage change in CPI is greater than three
percent (3.0%), then the Maximum Assessment will be by the change in
CPI.
• Example 2 — If the percentage change in CPI is less than three percent
(3.0%), then the Maximum Assessment will be adjusted by three percent.
MuniFinancial Page 10
Engineer's Report
Sandpiper Cot..,...andscaping and Lighting District
Although the Maximum Assessment will be recalculated and adjusted each
year, the City Council may reduce or freeze the Maximum Assessment at
any time, or may approve a percentage increase less than the amount allowed
by amending ordering a modification to the Engineer's Annual Report.
Although the Maximum Assessment will normally increase each year, the
actual District assessments may remain virtually unchanged. The Maximum
Assessment adjustment is designed to establish a reasonable limit on District
assessments. The Maximum Assessment calculated each year does not require
or facilitate an increase to the annual assessment rate applied to properties
within the District and neither does it restrict assessments to the adjustment
maximum amount. If the budget and corresponding assessments for the fiscal
year does not require an increase, or the increase is less than the Adjusted
Maximum Assessment, then the required budget and assessment rate may be
applied without additional property owner balloting. If the budget and
assessments calculated requires an increase greater than the Adjusted
Maximum Assessment then the assessment is considered an increased
assessment.
To impose an increased assessment the City Council must comply with the
provisions of Proposition 218 (Article XIIID Section 4c of the California
Constitution). Proposition 218 requires a public hearing and certain protest
procedures including mailed notice of the public hearing and property
owner protest balloting proceedings for the increased amount. Property
owners through the balloting process must approve the proposed assessment
increase. If the proposed assessment is approved, then a new Maximum
Assessment is established for the District. If the proposed assessment increase
is not approved, the City Council may not levy an assessment greater than
the current Adjusted Maximum Assessment for the District.
MuniFinancial Page 11
Engineer's Report
Sandpiper Co....—andscaping and Lighting District
IV. DISTRICT BUDGET
A. DESCRIPTION OF BUDGET ITEMS
The following describes the services and costs that are funded through the
District, shown in the District Budget table in the following section.
DIRECT COSTS
Maintenance Costs
Includes all contracted labor, material and equipment required to properly
maintain the landscaping, irrigation systems, drainage systems, fencing, and
entry monuments within the District. All improvements within the District
are maintained and serviced on a regular basis. The frequency and specific
maintenance operations required within the District are determined by City
staff, but are generally scheduled weekly.
Landscape Water
Utility costs for water required for irrigation of the landscaped areas.
Landscape Electric
Utility costs for electricity required for irrigation systems and any
ornamental lighting associated with the landscaped areas.
Street Lighting
Utility costs for electricity required for streetlights, as well as the
maintenance of the streetlights.
Special District Services
These are specialized services provided in addition to the normal
maintenance services. These costs and services may include, but are not
limited to:
• Tree Trimming — This includes the additional cost of all contracted
labor, material and equipment for trimming the trees in the public rights-
of-way or landscaped areas.
• Graffiti Abatement — This includes the additional cost of all contracted
labor, material and equipment required to repair, sandblast and paint
surfaces in the public rights-of-way that are associated with the
improvements.
MuniFinancial Page 12
Engineer's Report
Sandpiper Coll.,.andscaping and Lighting District
Maintenance Repairs
This item includes repairs that are not included in the yearly maintenance
contract. These costs generally include normal repair or replacement of
portions of the improvements and amenities, including plant material,
irrigation or electrical equipment and may also include planned upgrades of
the improvements.
Miscellaneous Maintenance
This is a contingency item for additional costs that are not normally
included in the regular yearly maintenance cost. This may include repairs or
replacements of damaged improvements due to vandalism, storms, or frost
and may also include expenditures for additional services or equipment
related to the improvements that are necessary to ensure the operation or
quality of maintenance.
ADMINISTRATION COSTS
District Administration
The cost to all-particular departments and staff of the City for providing the
coordination of District services, operations and maintenance of the District,
and response to public concerns and education. This budget item also
includes the costs of contracting with professionals to provide any additional
administrative, legal or engineering services specific to the District, including
the preparation of annual reports, resolutions and all other procedures
associated with the levy and collection of assessments.
County Administration Fees
This is the estimated charge the District will pay the County for services
related to the levy and collection of assessments on the property tax bills.
This charge is based on a flat rate per fund number plus an additional charge
per assessment.
Miscellaneous Administration
This fund represents additional costs associated with District administration
that are not normally included in the regular yearly administration costs.
This may include special engineering services (including formation costs or
changes to the District), legal services, contract negotiations, preparation and
mailing of notices, property owner protest ballots, and tabulation of the
ballots.
MuniFinancial Page 13
Engineer's Report
Sandpiper Cour.Landscaping and Lighting District
LEVY BREAKDOWN
This section of the Budget summarizes the District expenditures and
revenues estimated for the upcoming fiscal year to establish the special
benefit assessment revenue necessary to provide and maintain the District
improvements for the year (Balance To Levy).
Total Direct and Administrative Costs
This is the combined total of the estimated Direct Costs and Administration
Costs budgeted for the fiscal year.
Reserve Fund Collection/Transfer
The Reserve Fund Collection/Transfer item reflects the amount of money
to be collected (positive amount) or transferred (negative amount) from the
District's Reserve Fund Account for the fiscal year as part of the annual
assessments. (Refer to General Information — Reserve Fund Account for an
explanation of the Reserve Fund).
CIP Collection/Transfer (Capital Improvement Projects)
The CIP Collection/Transfer item reflects the amount of money to be
collected (positive amount) or transferred (negative amount) from the
District's (Capital Improvement Projects Account for the fiscal year as part
of the annual assessments. (Refer to General Information — Capital
Improvement Projects (CIP) for an explanation of the Capital Improvement
Project Funds).
Reimbursable Contributions/Replenishments
Reimbursable Contributions/Replenishments reflect money previously
advanced or being advanced to the District from non-District sources that
are identified as temporary loans for special benefit improvements and must
be repaid. A temporary advance or loan to the District does not occur unless
the District's Reserve Fund Account has been completely exhausted first.
A positive amount for the Reimbursable Contributions/Replenishments
represents a complete or partial repayment of money previously advanced to
the District (Replenishment). If a temporary loan was previously made to
the District, the Beginning Reserve Fund Balance will be a negative amount
(reflecting the outstanding balance previously advanced to the District).
Money collected for Reimbursable Replenishments will increase the total
amount of special benefits to be assessed, but will also reduce or eliminate
the Reserve Fund deficit.
MuniFinancial Page 14
Engineer's Report
Sandpiper Coll.,Landscaping and Lighting District
A negative amount for the Reimbursable Contributions/Replenishments
represents any new or additional money being advanced to the District's
special benefit improvement costs for the current fiscal year (Contribution).
Money identified as Reimbursable Contribution (negative amount) will
reduce the total amount of special benefits to be assessed, but will also create
a Reserve Fund deficit or add to any previous Reserve Fund deficit.
Reimbursable Contributions are only made to the District after all District
fund balances have been used first.
Other Revenue Sources/Contributions
Other Revenue Sources/Contributions identifies money being applied to the
annual District Costs that are not from District assessments, but unlike
Reimbursable Contributions/Replenishments these funds are not
reimbursed by assessments. These funds are added to the District account to
pay for improvements that are identified as general benefits and/or to reduce
the annual assessments. These funds are typically from non-District sources
including contributions from the City's General Fund, developers or impact
fees. These funds are first used to pay District costs that have been identified
as general benefit and then used to reduce the annual special benefit
assessments. The amount indicated for this item will either be a zero or a
negative number (representing an assessment reduction).
Balance to Levy
This is the total amount to be levied and collected through assessments for
the current fiscal year. The Balance to Levy represents the sum of Total of
the Direct and Administration Costs, the Reserve and CIP
Collection/Transfers, Reimbursable Contributions/Replenishments and
Other Revenue Source Contributions.
DISTRICT STATISTICS
Total Number of Parcels
Represents the total number of parcels physically within the District
boundary.
Total Parcels Levied
Represents the total number of parcels within the District that will be
assessed for special benefits from the improvements. Non-assessable lots or
parcels include areas and/or parcels within the boundaries of the District
that do not receive special benefits from the improvements.
MuniFinancial Page 15
Engineer's Report
Sandpiper Court Landscaping and Lighting District
Total Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU)
Equivalent Dwelling Units (EDU) is a numeric value calculated for each
parcel's proportionate special benefits based on the parcel's land use and
relationship to the improvements and other parcels that benefit from the
improvements. The EDU shown in the District budget represents the sum
total of all parcel EDU's that receive benefit from the improvements. Refer
to the Method of Apportionment Section of this Report for a more complete
description of EDU's.
Levy per EDU
This amount represents the assessment rate being applied to each parcel's
individual EDU. The Levy per Equivalent Dwelling Unit, is the result of
dividing the total Balance to Levy, by the sum of the District EDU's, for the
fiscal year.
GENERAL INFORMATION
This section of the Budget provides information regarding the fund balances
for the Reserve Fund Account and the Capital Improvement Project
Account (CIP). This section also provides an accounting of the Adjusted
Maximum Levy Per EDU (Assessment) allowed based on the Assessment
Range Formula adopted and approved by the property owners.
Reserve Fund Account
A Reserve Fund Account is authorized by the 1972 Act and allows the
District to retain sufficient amounts of the annual revenues necessary to
operate the District for the first half of the fiscal year. The District's budget
is based on a fiscal year that begins on July 1, but the first part of the annual
assessments is generally not available until after December. The annual
assessments shown in the District budget are collected by the County
through property tax bills and are typically paid in two installments,
December 10, and April 10. However, the County usually disperses the first
tax bill installments to the District in January or February and the second
tax bill installments in May or June. Therefore, a Reserve Fund is established
for cash flow purposes, much like a personal checking account. As District
expenditures are incurred, money from the Reserve Fund Account is used to
pay those expenses and the fund is replenished when the County disperses
assessment revenues to the District. The establishment of a Reserve Fund
eliminates the need for the City to temporarily transfer funds from non-
District accounts to pay for District expenses.
Similarly, any surplus or deficit from the prior fiscal year (Beginning
Balance) is also reflected in the Reserve Fund Account. When the actual cost
MuniFinancial Page 16
Engineer's Report
Sandpiper Coui i.,.andscaping and Lighting District
and expenditures in the prior fiscal year were greater than the revenue
collected, the District has a Beginning Balance Deficit. When the actual cost
and expenditures in the prior fiscal year were less than the revenue collected,
the District has a Beginning Balance Surplus. Any revenue surplus or deficit
from the prior fiscal year is added or subtracted in the Reserve Fund and
reflected in the Beginning Reserve Fund. The Beginning Reserve Fund
represents the District's available funds at the start of the current fiscal year.
(It is possible for the Beginning Reserve Fund to be a negative number if
prior expenses exceeded revenues.)
The Reserve Fund Collection/Transfer reflects the amount to be collected as
part of the current year's assessments or used (transferred) from the Reserve
Fund to reduce assessments for the current fiscal year. The Anticipated
Reserve Balance reflects the amount of money expected to be in the Reserve
Fund at the end of the current fiscal year and beginning of the next fiscal
year.
Capital Improvement Projects (CIP)
The Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) Account represents funds collected
for planned renovations or replacement of the improvements. The cost of
major renovations or replacements is usually greater than an amount that
can reasonably be collected in one fiscal year. The CIP Account allows for
collection of revenues for these special projects over several years. This
account differs from the Reserve Fund Account in that the money collected
must be for a specified project, the money collected must be spent within a
five-year period, and there is no limit to the amount that may be collected.
The CIP Collection/Transfer reflects the amount to be collected as part of
the current year's assessments or used from the Capital Improvement
Projects Account for the fiscal year as part of the annual assessments. The
Anticipated CIP Balance reflects the amount of money expected to be in the
Capital Improvement Projects Account at the end of the current fiscal year
and beginning of the next fiscal year.
Adjusted Maximum Levy Per EDU
The Adjusted Maximum Levy Per EDU (Assessment) is calculated annually
independent of the assessment rate for the current fiscal year (Levy per
Equivalent Dwelling Unit). If the Levy per Equivalent Dwelling Unit for the
year is greater than the Adjusted Maximum Levy Per EDU allowed, the
assessment is considered an increased assessment and the increase must be
approved by the property owners pursuant to California Constitution
Article XIIID.
MuniFinancial Page 17
Engineer's Report
Sandpiper Court Landscaping and Lighting District
B. DISTRICT BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2000/2001
Proposed Special General Assessable
Budget Benefit Benefit Costs
DIRECT COSTS
Maintenance Costs $1,650 $1,650 $0 $1,650
Landscape Water 900 900 0 900
Landscape Electric 180 180 0 180
Street Lighting 130 130 0 130
Special District Services 50 50 0 50
Maintenance Repairs 900 900 0 900
Miscellaneous Maintenance 0 0 0 0
Direct Costs(Subtotal) 3,810 3,810 0 3,810
ADMINISTRATION COSTS
District Administration 805 805 0 805
County Administration Fees 86 86 0 86
Miscellaneous Administration 5,000 5,000 0 5,000
Administration Costs(Subtotal) 5,891 5,891 0 5,891
LEVY BREAKDOWN
Total Direct and Admin.Costs 9,701 9,701 0 9,701
Reserve Fund Collection/Transfer 470 470 0 470
CIP Collection/Transfers 0 0 0 0
Reimbursable Contributions/Replenishments 0 0 0 0
Other Revenue Sources/Contributions (5,000) (5,000) 0 (5,000)
Balance to Levy 5,171 5,171 0 5,171
DISTRICT STATISTICS
Total Parcels 19
Total Parcels Levied 16
Total Equivalent Dwelling Units 16.00
Levy per EDU $323.20
GENERAL INFORMATION
Reserve Fund Account
Beginning Reserve Fund Balance 0 0 0 0
Reserve Collection/Transfers 470 470 0 470
Anticipated Reserve Balance 470 470 0 470
Capital Improvement Projects(CIP)
Beginning CIP Balance 0 0 0 0
CIP Collection/Transfers Q Q Q Q
Anticipated CIP Balance 0 0 0 0
Adjusted Maximum Levy per EDU $323.20
The Developer has paid the costs associated with the formation of the District and are itemized as
"Miscellaneous Administration" cost and"Other Revenue Source/Contributions" revenues.
MuniFinancial Page 18
Engineer's Report
Sandpiper Court Landscaping and Lighting District
APPENDIX A - DISTRICT DIAGRAMS
The District consists of all lots and parcels located within the residential development
known as the Sandpiper Court (Tract 27370-00). The District is generally located east of
Monterey Avenue, south of Hovley Lane West, west of Portola Avenue and incorporates
all the single-family residential parcels of Tract 27370-00 located on Sandpiper Court. The
Boundary Diagram for Sandpiper Court Landscaping and Lighting District and supporting
Assessor's Parcel Map and Tract Map 27370-00 are shown on the following pages and are
inclusive of all lots and Assessor's Parcel Numbers within the District and constitute the
Assessment Diagram for the Sandpiper Court Landscaping and Lighting District.
MuniFinancial Page 19
I
BOUNDARY DIAG1.n14
SANDPIPER COURT LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT
ZONE 6-SANDPIPER COURT OF THE
PALM DESERT CONSOLIDATED LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT
IN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT,COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE,STATE OF CALIFORNIA
TRACT NO.227370-00
A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUAR n R OF THE SOUTHWEST
QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 8,T3S,R.6E,SBBM
(Na9'42'4rE 19a6.42'1
N82'42'41'E 1988.38'
(F(OUND 1' IRON PIPE FOUND I' IRON PIPE •
(<N8742'44'( 552.837) PEA 3)24/3I- T113PERGED CCRLNER a RECORD
N6742'41'E 662.70' TAG RG.E 23236 95-59
- �,1 �( Na842'4'E 331.32' •
J31.36' V 1i H J1�5O,52 49.49' �� b 132509'' -
FOUND 1' IRON PIPE J/1( �s ;�I '� 9 A. S (1 J25.59')
TAGGED R.C.E. 2555E II. 175 700, 1 11.0
(RUSH):No REF.; 19 I41 7u r l� 18 ACCEPTED FOR NW OCR.
E 1/2.SE 1/4, SW 1/4,
NE 1/4,SEC. 8, C1.024Ae. �'�i0p�"' 0.02 Ae.
T.3 S.,14 6 E N4SO4'2 `� N 51 6-E
1 24.22' I I� 3.n 17 i
FOUNO 1' IRON PIPE 0.25 Ac. 4I 0.2E Ar: $
TAGGED R.C.E. 25658 0l •
SCCEPTCCEPTED IN LIEU OF(FLUSH): NO REF.; N69'42'41'E I I 1 N89'42'41"E
SPIKE AND WASHER 140.57' 140.67'
PER
PER MB 112/40-45, I
AND MB 239/25-26 $ 2 p1 Ib 16
n 0.23M. , Al O i gp, 0.23 Act Ili
N69'12'{1'E�(1 Er r PIE 1489'42'4YE
1 140.68' la. I 140.68' I(Zj,
$ 3 $ . I.
15 $ Q
0.23 M. n W 33 W ig 2/
r4
r H69'42'N 2'E g<I I N694Y41'E
qR
a, a 140.89' g 1 140.59' la 1� %a *.i
_ 1 2I. �
IN
N69'4Y41'f I N8742'41'E Srr
1E 140.69' I 140.69' o
3335i
5
0.23 A. g ` 1,..1. .]M.
K. •
a N6442'41'E I New 4241'E
+4734'041'4q•7(q01'f6m ! T----163r 40.70'
14S0'SSE (RI O
$ e� e I 12
Fd N • 0 • ti 0.13 Ae. ^ 0
4T44��46"Wf. , \n j°'-a--Ey.� Q.
Nnr4Y44'E / 1 SN69'42VI'E
114.00' I J 114.11'
CI 4.1
11
0.23 A
v e. \ c 0 Ae.
tea a 33.
at' �h,i 4. y 7sr 7aK FOUND
1' IRON
669P5PE
FWND 7 IRON PIPE TAGGED .:PI
8 6~ 9 & 207 Ac. *W• PER CORNEA RECORD
95-57
R.C.E. 24069 (FLUSH), PER r(_,..
0.27 Ae. .!
17,
MB 239/25-2e u = LOT •E+ H
0.15 Az. (N69'44�i5E��325.D0')
tI NB9'H'12`E JJ1.45'
N8744'17E 562.90'
cNe9'44'31'E 661.877
M89'44'17E 1986.72'
Assessment Identifications
ASSESSOR'S ASSESSOR'S
ASMT.NO. PARCEL NUMBER PARCEL DESCRIPTION ACRES ASMT.NO. PARCEL NUMBER PARCEL DESCRIPTION ACRES
1 622-340-039 Tract 27370-00 Lot 1 025 12 622-340-050 Tract 27370-00 Lot 11 023
2 622-340-040 Tract 27370-00 Lot 2 0.23 13 622340-051 Tract 27370-00 Lot 12 0.23
3 622340-041 Tract 27370-00 Lot 3 0.23 _ 14 622340052 Tract 27370-00 Lot 13 0.23
4 822340-042 - Tract 27370-00 Lot 4 0.23 15 622340-053 Tract 27370-00 Lot 14 0.23
5 622-340-043 Tract 27370-00 Lot 5 0.23 18 822340-54 Tract 27370-00 Lot 15 0.23
6 622-340-044 Tract 27370-00 Lot 6 0.23 17 622-340-055 Tract 27370-00 Lot 18 0.28
7 622-340-045 Tract 27370-00 tot 7 0.23 18 622340-058 Tract 27370-00 Lot C 0.02
8 622-340-046 Tract 27370-00 Lot 8 0.27 19 622-340-057 Trad 27370-00 Lot D 0.02 1
9 • 822340-047 Tract 27370-00 Lot E 0.15 Bayley Lane Not Assigned Tract 2737000 Lot A 0.08 1
10 622340048 Tract 27370-00 Lot 9 0.27 Sanapiper Court Not Assigned Tract 27370-00 Lot B 0.68
11 622340-049 L Tract 27370-00 Lot 10 0.23 Not Assigned
NAP WAS PREPARED FOR ASSESSMENT PURPOSES ONLY. NO LIABILITY T.R.A. 018-054 6 2 2 - 3 4
NUED FOR WAU1- LI DATA IASSESSOR'S S L 018-216
C LYYITHLOCAL0SPT CR WILDH SITE ORDINANCES. POR.SWNE 8 T.5S. ,R.6E 622-02
32 05
I
- HaVLEY - I ;- - - . - - WEST ' - - -
NU-.2-..E 35 .. ® 5---)1--
^ )73 34 LOT L1 I I 7 24)3-1 -_ LOT A / ZnT- E-- - - I 331.37 1' = 100'
nr t1iT iT3- - v a
le]..G Ir3.0 115.11 \ 7 IIG.I1 LOT D J T.27370 f
LAT c ANGLE=0
8 ®
Y esrs25
i B 1 6 ^: esE II . O T : 1 3 Y es I es i 5
1u.71 1 .O7 1 .37 141.// U/.57 14/.Oy ^ Y
- 2 I
31 ^ i r. 92 5 s
^ ^ 0 2 ^ t z 40 E 54 ^
-140.7E I 10.0 IUJ9 I UI J/ I
•
t!
t4 31 ` 20 M 14 14 ^ O3 3 g ^ 3 41 ^ 14 0
14/.72 141.67 140'4/ 141.// 1./.Lf I.r.G9
-
Ts 30 I 21 4 13 u LI
^ 1 O 4 ^ 31 ^ 4 42 rj. a 0 ^ O
OL 140.75 ���333 149.G7 141.41 �+ 141.110 �j
4.75 AC
n 29 ^ ® a " 012 s $ :'" O s " " s 43 ^ ^ 12 51 \ _
141.76 [S I f7 Iw.K L7.tl e!I t! 141.// 148.72 I U/.7/
28 23 ° " II 33.t. 3.E4 (I) ° " ^ a 44 ` n 50
28
4�
11G.)4 116.15 114.23 4 11. 113J6 114 1 114.11
D 7 D 4 7I� 7 O
-74 0 0 _ 0 •+r •` _ 45 s 0
'.,r `
LOT E D
ssc so 9 OPEN E
2 • � E e :5 O O 6 1 8
k...
. _ ] »
OPEN SPACE117.7! T/t4773 4^TR[4773-1 1t3.51 LOT C M07-a.-IEE ItoIl/ fl5i 91.02 II6./7 731.41 fl..! 12/ TR[]37/ „
N/l-44-31E
- SAN- - - - - -REMO- - - - -
07 NB 239/25-26 TR NO 24773-1 •
. �1B 269/81-82 TR NO 24773
. 0 l 010 1.,011 I MI7 M]e/t
IN THE CITY OF PAI IESERT
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
TRACT NO. 27370
BEING A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF THE
EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF
THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST t%
QUARTER OF SECTION 5, T.5S., R.6E., SBBM . .WARNER ENGINEERING NOVEMBER 1997
R
.`
44.0T' e'
s
CONVEYED TO THE COUNTY
Mlb �_ OF RIVERSIDE PER 'NM 10'
BASIS FOR' BEARINGS �/„/�75 DRD� LOT I 10'
THE BASIS FOR BEARINGS SHOWN OM �� -
ON TH S MAP IS THE EAST UNE OF
U.S.�22224/31-33.e(0ic'Novoncr i PER
. HOVLEY LANE WEST DETAIL
(N�avii'41'E ¶999J6)
FOUND 1• IRON PIPE FOUND 1' IRON PIPE
(<NB74744'E 662.53')) ZR) TA)2FLU/SH PER WRLNERe cORD
NBP42'41'E 66270' TAD RCM 252515 95-56
�� NB9'42'4z'E 331.32' _
33138' ✓ OyLEY:,LANE 115pa2j•�.�w.49• WEST �,r $ 1325.68'MHO I't' NON PIPE j "1 Z ,31/ k, _ (1]2539')
(FTAGGED ROE 23656cut. I II 1.�p 115.1 1 1QO Op' �IS_._ 1i,
LUSH); NO RE s tYi' I �1 77
E I/ E 1/4,SW 1/4, I
NE 1/4,SEC. B. 0.02-AB• 0.02 Az-
. T.5 5..R B C. $ N4s04'22TW It
11.�- N�5A•2B-EFOUND i• IRON PIPE O.25 Az. 1y{ Ia2e8A�. $
TAGGED
1:R.C.Z.REF.:39 "acttisI I�i
N UEU OF NB942'41'E ) ( Net 4Y4 t'E I
SPINE AND RASHER 140.671 140.67
PER MB 112/40-45, I I
AND MB 239/25-26 g 2 tO R, I$ 15 $
n Al,022 M. 10 6, 0.23 Ac j
N69'42.41'E4r1 [5 ' PUE N674Y41'E
140.68' 6 I11h 1 140.60' I�
ig Er: 1,.
3 $1 � 1 Q
0
oa3 Ac ^
I : W 23 14 Ac
A Ng9'42'41'E $X $ I N69'4Y41'E
Ta 140.69' I �1 1 140.69' b,�1 1A I.^2
W u$ 0.243 Aa !V 1$ 0 13
$'.S n no
kk
ii a NB9'4741'E I NBP42'41'C '' 0p4 Hb
140,69' I. 140.69' c
5 $ 6, I$ 12 $%iX
,, 0.23 As. �' .L" 023 Az P
N69.42'41'E 1
I NB9'4Y41'E
140.70'16m, 2 iii���----�++U7'140.70' 0
R4734'04'40 ER) c +1 N45'50'53'E (R1
gD AO. 4r I .10 11
n
N`4rw�R)4
00'�Ey+ P.. a
NBP42'41*E// ��}!}TN89'42'4YE
114.00' r I 114.11'
10
0337AA. P q` C9 -t° 0.233 A4:
s
# L,; 7 0'/0• FOUND 1' NON PIPE
AO `�• -Yt `SF y TAGGED LS. 6697
'QO. PER CORNER RECORD
FOUND 7 IRON PIPE, TAGGED 8 $x Y O 9 9s-57
B.C.E. �0691(FLUSH). PER 0.27 Ac b &
MEI i
6
p Ac. (NRIi'323�2325.D0')
331.45' /I. 120.00' 91 43' 120.00'
V N69'4�'17E 331.43'
NB9'44'17E 662.90'
•
N69'44'17E 1966.72'
LEGEND/SURVEYOR'S NOTES
® NOICATES EASEMENT REFERENCE NUMBER
IS MOICATES CURVE DATA NUMBER
•
NDICATES MONUMENT FOUND AS NOTED
EASEMENT DATA SET
PER R"RSIDE CURVE DATA
0 10-FOOT WIDE EASEMENT N FAVOR ' INDICATES SET 7 RON PIPE. ir L0140 CURIE ) RADIUS DELTA LENGTH TANGENT
OF THE COACHELLA VALLEY COUNTY TAGGED R.C.C.23256(FLUSH)
WATER DISTRICT FOR PIPELINE C1 43.00' 44'1731' 33.24' 17.50'
PURPOSES PER INSTRUMENT MO. . INDICATES SET Y RON PIPE. ir LONG CO 5200' 36'10'47 34.65' 16.00'
52553 RECORDED WY 21, 1963. TAGGED B.C.E.23256(FLUSH) • C3 52.00' 43.03'27' 39.11' 20.53'
OFTILTAL RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE C4 5200' 3703'49' 33.64' 17.43'
COUNTY: SEE DETAIL ON THIS SHEET. (-) NDICATES RECORD DATA PER M.B. 224/31-33 CO 52.00' 37I770' 29AY 14.90'
CB 52.00' 3717'2Q 33.94' 17.54'
10-FOOT WOE EASEMENT IN FAVOR <-> NDICATES RECORD DATA PER U.S. 239/25-I5 C7 52.00' 4749'41' 39.75' 20.92'
OF GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPORATED CB 52.00' 3709.11f 33.77 17.45'
FOR POLE LINES AND INCIDENTAL SET 1' IRON PIPE. FLUSH,OR NAIL AND TAG C9 5200' 265'35'0S 243.78' 0.00'
PURPOSES PER NS D I CIC NO. F CORNER FALLS'IN WALL OR WALL FOOTING.
226005 RECORDED JUKE 22. 1992 WITH TAG R.C.E.23256 AT AU.REAR LOT
OFFICIAL RECORDS OP R VERSIDE CORNERS; SET LIAD AND TAG B.C.E.23256
N TOP OF CURB AT THE PROLONGATION OF
COUNTY. SIDE LOT LINES FOR FRONT CORNERS.
THIS TRACT CONTAINS 4.786 ACRES P.N. Ce385F14
Engineer's Report
Sandpiper Court Landscaping and Lighting District
APPENDIX B -ASSESSMENT ROLL
Parcel identification for each lot or parcel within the District, shall be the parcel as shown
on the Riverside County Secured Roll for the year in which this Report is prepared and
reflective of the Riverside County Assessor's Parcel Maps.
A listing of parcels assessed within this District, along with the assessment amounts is
included in the following table.
Assessment Proposed
APN Number Parcel Description Assessment
622-340-039 1 Tract 27370-00 Lot 1 $323.20
622-340-040 2 Tract 27370-00 Lot 2 323:20
622-340-041 3 Tract 27370-00 Lot 3 323.20
622-340-042 4 Tract 27370-00 Lot 4 323.20
622-340-043 5 Tract 27370-00 Lot 5 323.20
622-340-044 6 Tract 27370-00 Lot 6 323.20
622-340-045 7 Tract 27370-00 Lot 7 323.20
622-340-046 8 Tract 27370-00 Lot 8 323.20
622-340-047 9 Tract 27370-00 Lot E 0.00
622-340-048 10 Tract 27370-00 Lot 9 323.20
622-340-049 11 Tract 27370-00 Lot 10 323.20
622-340-050 12 Tract 27370-00 Lot 11 323.20
622-340-051 13 Tract 27370-00 Lot 12 323.20
622-340-052 14 Tract 27370-00 Lot 13 323.20
622-340-053 15 Tract 27370-00 Lot 14 323.20
622-340-054 16 Tract 27370-00 Lot 15 323.20
622-340-055 17 Tract 27370-00 Lot 16 323.20
622-340-056 18 Tract 27370-00 Lot C 0.00
622-340-057 19 Tract 27370-00 Lot D 0.00
Total Assessment $5,171.20
MBIA MuniFinancial Page 23