The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2024-06-18 PC Regular Meeting Agenda Packet PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF PALM DESERT REGULAR MEETING POST-MEETING AGENDA Tuesday, June 18, 2024 6:00 p.m. Council Chamber, City Hall 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, California Pursuant to Assembly Bill 2449, this meeting will be conducted as a hybrid meeting and there will be in-person access to this location. To participate via Zoom, use the following link: https://palmdesert.zoom.us/j/84739707419 or call (213) 338-8477, Zoom Meeting ID: 847 3970 7419 • Written public comment may also be submitted to PlanningCommission@palmdesert.gov. E- mails received by 3:00 p.m. prior to the meeting will be distributed to the Commission. Any correspondence received during or after the meeting will be distributed to the Commission as soon as practicable and retained for the official record. Emails will not be read aloud except as an ADA accommodation. • Pages 1.CALL TO ORDER 2.ROLL CALL 3.PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 4.NONAGENDA PUBLIC COMMENTS This time has been set aside for the public to address the Planning Commission on issues that are not on the agenda for up to three minutes. Speakers may utilize one of the three options listed on the first page of the agenda. Because the Brown Act does not allow the Planning Commission to act on items not listed on the agenda, members may briefly respond or refer the matter to staff for a report and recommendation at a future meeting. 5.CONSENT CALENDAR All matters listed on the Consent Calendar are considered routine and may be approved by one motion. The public may comment on any items on the Consent Agenda within the three-minute time limit. Individual items may be removed by the Planning Commission for a separate discussion. RECOMMENDATION: To approve the consent calendar as presented. 5.a APPROVAL OF MINUTES 5 RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Minutes of June 4, 2024. 6.CONSENT ITEMS HELD OVER 7.ACTION CALENDAR The public may comment on individual Action Items within the three-minute time limit. Speakers may utilize one of the three options listed on the first page of the agenda. 8.PUBLIC HEARINGS Anyone who challenges any hearing matter in court may be limited to raising only those issues he or she raised at the public hearing described herein, or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission at, or prior to, the public hearing. Remarks shall be limited to a maximum of three minutes unless the Planning Commission authorizes additional time. 8.a CONSIDERATION OF AN AMENDMENT OF A PRECISE PLAN AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO RELEASE REMAINDER PARCELS 4 & 5 OF TRACT 28818-1 OF THE MARRIOTT SHADOW RIDGE PROJECT AND FINDING THE PROJECT IS EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) 9 RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 2872 entitled, “A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A SECOND AMENDMENT OF PRECISE PLAN AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 98-5 APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 98-108 TO RELEASE DESIGNATED REMAINDER PARCELS 4 AND 5 OF TRACT 28818-1 FROM THE APPROVALS FOR THE MARRIOTT SHADOW RIDGE PROJECT LOCATED AT 9003 SHADOW RIDGE ROAD GENERALLY SOUTH OF GERALD FORD DRIVE AND EAST OF MONTEREY AVENUE AND FINDING THE PROJECT IS EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA)”, as amended. CASE NO. CUP24-0005 (PP/CUP 98-5 Amendment No. 2) Planning Commission Meeting 2 8.b CONSIDERATION OF A VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP AND PRECISE PLAN TO DEVELOP A 93-UNIT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVSION WITHIN MARRIOTT SHADOW RIDGE AND FINDING THE PROJECT IS EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) 65 RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 2873 entitled, “A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 38866 TO SUBDIVIDE APPROXIMATELY 20.69-ACRES INTO 93 NUMBERED LOTS, AND 13 LETTERED LOTS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY WITH PRIVATE OPEN SPACE, LANDSCAPE AND VEHICULAR ACCESS LOCATED ON SHADOW RIDGE ROAD GENERALLY SOUTH OF GERALD FORD DRIVE AND EAST OF MONTEREY AVENUE AND FINDING THE PROJECT IS EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA)”, as amended. CASE NO. VTTM 38866 (TTM23-0005) 1. Adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 2874 entitled, “A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PRECISE PLAN FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 93 UNIT SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION LOCATED ON SHADOW RIDGE ROAD WITHIN THE EXISTING MARRIOTT SHADOW RIDGE DEVELOPMENT, AND FINDING THAT THE PROJECT IS EXEMPT FROM FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT.” CASE NO. PP23-0023 2. 8.c CONSIDER ADOPTING A NOTICE OF EXEMPTION AND APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR AN OUTDOOR PATIO FOR DINING PURPOSES FOR AN EXISTING RESTAURANT AT 72990 EL PASEO, SUITE 3 1161 RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 2875 entitled, “A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A NOTICE OF EXEMPTION PURSUANT TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) AND APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) FOR AN OUTDOOR PATIO FOR DINING PURPOSES FOR AN EXISTING RESTAURANT AT 72990 EL PASEO, SUITE 3” Return the item to ARC and bring plans for storage container only further review with a request to revise the storage container to a more elegant appearance and return to Planning Commission for review. 9.INFORMATIONAL REPORTS & COMMENTS 9.a SUMMARY OF CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS Planning Commission Meeting 3 9.b COMMITTEE MEETING UPDATES 9.b.1 Cultural Arts Committee 9.b.2 Parks and Recreation Committee 9.c PLANNING COMMISSIONERS 9.d CITY STAFF 9.e ATTENDANCE REPORT 1231 10.ADJOURNMENT The next Regular Meeting will be held on July 2, 2024, at 6:00 p.m. 11.PUBLIC NOTICES Agenda Related Materials: Pursuant to Government Code §54957.5(b)(2) the designated office for inspection of records in connection with this meeting is the Office of the City Clerk, Palm Desert Civic Center, 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert. Staff reports for all agenda items considered in open session, and documents provided to a majority of the legislative bodies are available for public inspection at City Hall and on the City’s website at www.palmdesert.gov. Americans with Disabilities Act: It is the intention of the City of Palm Desert to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) in all respects. If, as an attendee or a participant at this meeting, or in meetings on a regular basis, you will need special assistance beyond what is normally provided, the City will attempt to accommodate you in every reasonable manner. Please contact the Office of the City Clerk, (760) 346-0611, at least 48 hours prior to the meeting to inform us of your needs and to determine if accommodation is feasible. AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING I hereby certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing agenda for the Planning Commission was posted on the City Hall bulletin board and City website not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting. /S/ Niamh M. Ortega Assistant City Clerk Planning Commission Meeting 4 PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF PALM DESERT REGULAR MEETING MINUTES June 4, 2024, 6:00 p.m. Present: Commissioner Nancy DeLuna, Commissioner John Greenwood, Commissioner Lindsay Holt, Chair Joseph Pradetto Absent: Commissioner Ron Gregory Staff Present: Director of Development Services Richard Cannone, Recording Secretary Níamh Ortega, Principal Planner Nick Melloni, Principal Planner Carlos Flores, Legal Counsel Oscar Verdugo 1. CALL TO ORDER A Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission was called to order by Chairman Pradetto on Tuesday, June 4, 2024, at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber, City Hall, located at 73 - 510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California. 2. ROLL CALL 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Commissioner Holt led the Pledge of Allegiance. 4. NONAGENDA PUBLIC COMMENTS None. 5. CONSENT CALENDAR Motion by: Commissioner DeLuna Seconded by: Commissioner Holt To approve the consent calendar as presented. Motion Carried (4 to 0) 5.a APPROVAL OF MINUTES Motion by: Commissioner DeLuna Seconded by: Commissioner Holt Approve the Minutes of May 21, 2024. Motion Carried (4 to 0) 5 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes June 4, 2024 2 6. CONSENT ITEMS HELD OVER None. 7. ACTION CALENDAR None. 8. PUBLIC HEARINGS 8.a CONSIDERATION TO ADOPT AN INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION (SCH NO. 2023090542) OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT AND A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM FOR THE HAYSTACK CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT Principal Planner Melloni narrated a PowerPoint presentation and responded to Planning Commission inquiries. City Engineer Rowe and Project Manager Gayler responded to Planning Commission inquiries. Chair Pradetto opened the public hearing. Roy Shacter, Palm Desert resident, questioned if the project included the area west of Alamo. Richard Cruz, Palm Desert resident, noted he had not experienced flooding in the area in the years he lived in the neighborhood and expressed concern regarding the proposed changes. Steve Rivera, Palm Desert resident, opined that the City Council is not focused on infrastructure as a priority and urged the Planning Commission to consider its priorities. David Toltzmann, Palm Desert resident, expressed concern that the City does not have a horticulturalist on staff to assess project needs; opined that a horticulturalist should be involved with the project; and provided input on various aspects of the project. Allan G. Buller, Palm Desert resident, expressed concern regarding rip-rap preventing the growth of natural vegetation including smoke trees. CB Buller, Palm Desert resident, expressed concern regarding the potential for the project to destroy natural plant and animal life and urged the Planning Commission to return the project to the Planning department for review and proposal of alternatives. Suzy Houser, Palm Desert resident, opined that the wash has not been properly maintained over the years, and expressed dissatisfaction with the current management and maintenance of the area. John Curran, Palm Desert resident, opined the channel has not been properly maintained in the past and expressed concern that this would continue. William Bennett, Palm Desert resident, opined the project should be returned to the Planning Commission as it is not ready for consideration at this time. 6 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes June 4, 2024 3 Jann Buller, Palm Desert resident, questioned if Coachella Valley Water District was active in the area past Portola and opined that stopping the project at Portola Would not enable project completion. Cathy Forrister, Palm Desert resident, opined that the issues in the wash were the result of a lack of maintenance, questioned the need for the access road to be 10 feet wide, and requested that maintenance issues be addressed. Chair Pradetto closed the public hearing there being no other members of the public wishing to speak. Staff responded to additional questions by the Plann ing Commission. Motion by: Commissioner Greenwood Seconded by: Commissioner Holt Direct staff to continue the item, schedule community meetings to solicit additional input, and return to the Planning Commission after feedback from community meetings has been gathered. Motion Carried (4 to 0) 8.b CONSIDERATION OF A RECOMMENDATION TO THE PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL OF A ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT TO SECTIONS OF TITLE 25 OF THE PALM DESERT MUNICIPAL CODE AND FINDING THE ACTION EXEMPT PER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT Principal Planner Melloni narrated a PowerPoint presentation and responded to Planning Commissioner inquiries. Chair Pradetto opened and closed the public hearing, there being no members of the public wishing to speak. Eric Wilson, Attorney representing an operator, expressed support for the amendment. Motion by: Commissioner Greenwood Seconded by: Commissioner DeLuna Adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 2871 entitled, “A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT TO AMEND SECTIONS 25.16.030, 25.18.040, 25.28.070, 25.34.120, 25.68.020, AND 25.99.020 OF PALM DESERT MUNICIPAL CODE TITLE 25 AND MAKING A FINDING THAT THE ACTION IS EXEMPT FROM FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA).” Motion Carried (4 to 0) 7 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes June 4, 2024 4 9. INFORMATIONAL REPORTS & COMMENTS 9.a SUMMARY OF CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS No reportable actions. 9.b COMMITTEE MEETING UPDATES 9.b.1 Cultural Arts Committee No report. 9.b.2 Parks and Recreation Committee No report. 9.c PLANNING COMMISSIONERS Commissioner Greenwood deferred to Development Services Director Cannone who stated an appeal has been made to the City Council of the Building Board of Appeals recent decision to uphold a decision made by the Certified Building Official. Director Cannone will update the Commission on the outcome of the appeal once it is heard by the City Council. 9.d CITY STAFF 9.e ATTENDANCE REPORT A report was provided with the agenda materials; no action was taken on this item. 10. ADJOURNMENT The Planning Commission adjourned at 7:38 p.m. 11 . PUBLIC NOTICES _________________________ Níamh M. Ortega, Assistant City Clerk Recording Secretary _________________________ Richard Cannone, Director of Development Services Staff Liaison 8 Page 1 of 5 CITY OF PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MEETING DATE: June 18, 2024 PREPARED BY: Nick Melloni, AICP, Principal Planner REQUEST: CONSIDERATION OF AN AMENDMENT OF A PRECISE PLAN AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO RELEASE REMAINDER PARCELS 4 & 5 OF TRACT 28818-1 OF THE MARRIOTT SHADOW RIDGE PROJECT AND FINDING THE PROJECT IS EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 2872 entitled, “A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A SECOND AMENDMENT OF PRECISE PLAN AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 98-5 APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 98-108 TO RELEASE DESIGNATED REMAINDER PARCELS 4 AND 5 OF TRACT 28818-1 FROM THE APPROVALS FOR THE MARRIOTT SHADOW RIDGE PROJECT LOCATED AT 9003 SHADOW RIDGE ROAD GENERALLY SOUTH OF GERALD FORD DRIVE AND EAST OF MONTEREY AVENUE AND FINDING THE PROJECT IS EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA)” CASE NO. CUP24-0005 (PP/CUP 98-5 Amendment No. 2) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: On December 19, 2023, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution 2848 recommending the City Council approve a Second Amendment to Development Agreement DA 98-1 to accommodate the development of ninety-three (93) single family residential homes on the rather than time share units. City Council on January 24, 2024, City Council approved the amendment with the following conditions in order to allow termination of the Development Agreement on the project site per Subsection 6.6 of the agreement which requires: a) Sale of the property from Marriott to Toll Brothers with proof provided to the City; b) Payment of $1.6 million dollars from the proceeds of the sale to the City in-lieu of fees owed to the City under the DA; c) approval of an amendment to City Council Resolution No. 98 -108 to release the parcels. Accordingly, Marriott Ownership Resorts, Inc.(applicant), has applied for Planning Commission (PC) approval of an amendment to Precise Plan (PP) and Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 98 -5 (original approval) issued pursuant to City Council Resolution No. 98-108. The amendment, if approved, would satisfy condition c). 9 City of Palm Desert – Planning Commission Case No. CUP24-0005 (PP/CUP 98-5 Amendment) Marriott Shadow Ridge Page 2 of 5 This original approval allowed for the development of the Marriott Shadow Ridge Project including up to 999 timeshare units and an 18-hole golf course on an approximately 306-acre site located at the southeast corner of Monterey Avenue and Gerald Ford Drive. The proposed amendment requests the release of Designated Remainder Parcels 4 and 5, and Lot “D” of Tract 28818-1, consisting of 20.69-acres, within the existing development from the land use approvals of PP/CUP 98-5. The applicant’s request is intended to satisfy one of condition of the amended Development Agreement (DA) 98-1 and allow for the development of the 93-unit subdivision request by Toll Brothers for a Vesting Tentative Tract and Precise Plan, VTTM 38866 (TTM23-0005) - PP23-0023. Sale of the property by Marriott to Toll Brothers is contingent upon the City approving the necessary entitlements for the 93 -unit subdivision. Ultimately, approval of the 93-unit subdivision will be conditioned upon satisfaction of all conditions to terminate the DA on the project site. The proposed amendment may be approved by the PC and is consistent with the requirements of the amended Development Agreement approved by the City. Adoption of the staff recommendation will adopt a resolution approving the amendment to PP/CUP 98-5. The decision of the PC is final unless a formal request for appeal is made to the City Council. BACKGROUND In December 1998, the Palm Desert City Council approved a Development Agreement (“DA 98 - 1”) with Marriott Ownership Resorts, Inc. (“Marriott”) by Ordinance 888 and approved a Precise Plan/Conditional Use Permit (PP/CUP 98-5) and Tentative Tract Map 28818 as Resolution No. 98-108 for the development of the Marriott Shadow Ridge Golf Club, located on approximately 306 acres at the southeast corner of Monterey Avenue and Gerald Ford Drive. The agreement approved the development of an 18 -hole golf course with approximately 999 timeshare units to be completed in multiple phases. Additionally, under the terms of the agreement, Mar riott was required to remit a facilities fee to the City for a period of 20 years. The initial 20 -year term of the DA was extended through December 2030 by the first DA amendment adopted under Ordinance No. 1320. Marriott Shadow Ridge is partially developed and has remaining vacant pads in the eastern portions of the development. The original site plan approved by the City for the Marriott Time Shares is shown in Figure 1 for reference purposes as outlined in red. This area is approved for approximately 324 timeshare units within fifteen, three-story buildings. (Continued on following page) 10 City of Palm Desert – Planning Commission Case No. CUP24-0005 (PP/CUP 98-5 Amendment) Marriott Shadow Ridge Page 3 of 5 Figure 1 – Marriott Shadow Ridge Preliminary Site Plan (for Reference Only) On June 21, 2005, the PC adopted Resolution No. 2338 approving an amendment to the Precise Plan to alter the site plan and building design for the project architecture. At the time, approximately 424 of the timeshare units had been constructed, and the changes were proposed for approximately 248 units. The site plan changes affected the timeshares located near the southeastern area of the development. Marriot approached the City and expressed that the timeshare market is saturated in the Coachella Valley and stated their intent to pursue other options for vacant portions of Shadow Ridge, including the development of single-family homes. The city and Marriot negotiated that the existing Development Agreement terms would preclude other development options on the site unless the term expires, or the DA were amended based on negotiations between the City and Marriott. In late 2022, Marriott, in partnership with Toll Brothers Inc., returned to the City with a proposal to convert roughly 20 acres of undeveloped land located on the remainder Parcels 4 and 5, and Lot “D” of TR 28818-1 to 93 single-family homes rather than the remaining timeshare units. On January 24, 2024, the City Council adopted a second amendment of the Development Agreement to facilitate the development of the residential tract on the site by allowing termination of the development agreement on the parcels, subject to conditions. These con ditions are: 1. That Marriot provide a copy of the grant deed showing that the property has been conveyed to Toll Bros, Inc. 2. Payment of $1.6 million dollars from the proceeds of the land sale, which will be in lieu of the Weekly Facilities Fee which was to be paid to the City by Marriott for the Shadow Ridge Development. 11 City of Palm Desert – Planning Commission Case No. CUP24-0005 (PP/CUP 98-5 Amendment) Marriott Shadow Ridge Page 4 of 5 3. That Marriott obtain approval of a modification of the Precise Plan/Conditional Use Permit releasing the property from the requirements of Resolution no. 98 -108. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION a) Property Location/Description: The project site is a 20.69-acre property within the Marriott Shadow Ridge comprised of four (4) separate parcels. Primary and secondary access to the project site is provided from Shadow Ridge Road, a private street which runs through the property and connects to Monterey Avenue to the west, and Gerald Ford Drive to the north. The areas immediately surrounding the site are developed with an 18 - hole golf course, and existing timeshares and clubhouse areas are located further beyo nd to the west and south. The site is vacant and has been rough gra ded and disturbed in the past. It is currently characterized by scattered desert shrubs and blow sand deposits, with portions of the site being utilized for storage related to the operation of the existing golf course and timeshares near the site. b) Existing Adjacent Uses, General Plan and Zoning: Table 1 – Adjacent Land Use and Designations Existing Uses General Plan Zoning Project Site Time Share Development Resort and Entertainment District (RED) Planned Residential Five (5) dwelling units per acre (PR-5) North Commercial Retail/Single Family Regional Retail Center/Town Center Neighborhood (TCN) District Planned Commercial (PC-2) / PR South Mobile Home Park Golf Course Resort Neighborhood (GCRN) PR-5 East Vacant TCN Refuge Specific Plan West Vacant – Approved Mixed Use (Cotino) City of Rancho Mirage (Mixed-Use) City of Rancho Mirage Section 31 Specific Plan PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The proposed project is a request to remove the 20.69-acre site located on Designated Remainder Parcels 4 and 5 and Lot D of TR 28818 from the existing land use approvals established by City Council Resolution 98-108. The purpose of the change is to satisfy terms of the amended Development Agreement 98-1 to allow the termination of the DA on this site to facilitate development of a residential tract instead of the timeshare units currently approved for the site. Notwithstanding this change, no other modifications are proposed for the PP/CUP wh ich would remain in effect on the remaining areas of the existing development. 12 City of Palm Desert – Planning Commission Case No. CUP24-0005 (PP/CUP 98-5 Amendment) Marriott Shadow Ridge Page 5 of 5 ANALYSIS: The Planning Commission is the designated approving body for Precise Plans and Conditional Use Permits pursuant to Palm Desert Municipal Code (PDMC) Sections 25.72 .030 and 25.72.050. Modifications of these entitlements must occur subject to consideration at a duly noticed public hearing pursuant to findings required by the PDMC. Public Input: Public Notification Public noticing was conducted for the June 18, 2024, Planning Commission meeting, per the requirements of PDMC Section 25.60.060 and Government Code Sections 65090 to 65094. A public hearing notice was published on Friday, June 7, 2024, in The Desert Sun newspaper. Notices were mailed to all property owners and occupants within 1,000 feet of the Project Site. No comments by the public were received as of June 1 2, 2024. Environment Assessment/Environmental Review: City staff has reviewed the Project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the Project may be found exempt from further environmental review pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15183. The project wa s analyzed as a part of the analysis prepared for a separate case (VTTM 38866 and PP23-0023) which analyzed the whole of the project action including the amendment of this entitlement and the development of a 93-unit single-family residential subdivision in-lieu of the timeshare development. That Initial Study (Document) was prepared for the project which examined the potential environmental impacts of the action. This Document evaluated all CEQA issues contained in the latest Initial Study Checklist form. The project is consistent with the Palm Desert General Plan Update (General Plan Update), for which an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (SCH # 2015081020) was certified. The General Plan Update provides a framework for future growth of the City and projects the development reasonably expected to occur during the buildout period. The General Plan Update EIR analyzed the environmental impacts associated with the adoption and implementation of the General Plan Update. The proposed project is permitted in the zoning district where the project site is located and consistent with the land uses, density, and vision of the General Plan Update. The evaluation determined that either no impact or less than significant impacts would be associated with the project. Findings of Approval: Findings can be made in support of the project under the PDMC. Findings in support of this project are contained in the draft Planning Commission Resolution No . 2872. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Draft Planning Commission Resolution No. 2872 2. PC Public Hearing Notice 3. Applicant Request Letter a. Tract 28818-1 Maps for Reference 4. Notice of Exemption 13 14 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2872 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A SECOND AMENDMENT OF PRECISE PLAN AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 98-5 APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 98-108 TO RELEASE DESIGNATED REMAINDER PARCELS 4 AND 5 OF TRACT 28818-1 FROM THE APPROVALS FOR THE MARRIOTT SHADOW RIDGE PROJECT LOCATED AT 9003 SHADOW RIDGE ROAD GENERALLY SOUTH OF GERALD FORD DRIVE AND EAST OF MONTEREY AVENUE AND FINDING THE PROJECT IS EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA)CASE NOS. CASE NO. CUP24-0005 (PP/CUP 98-5 Amendment No. 2) WHEREAS, on April 18, 2024, the applicant, Marriott Ownership Resorts, filed a formal application with the City of Palm Desert for the approval of a second amendment to Precise Plan (PP) / Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 98-5, approved pursuant to City Council Resolution No. 98-108, to release Designated Remainder Parcel 4 and Designated Remainder Parcel 5, and Lot “D” of Tract 28818-1 on Riverside County Assessor Parcel Number(s) 694-290-010, -011, 694-320-010, and -011(“Project Site”); from the PP/CUP land use approval for Marriott Shadow Ridge; and WHEREAS, the Case No. PP/CUP 98-5 for the Marriott Shadow Ridge was originally approved, subject to conditions by the City Council on November 12, 1998, pursuant to City Council Resolution No. 98-108 attached herein as Exhibit “B”; and WHEREAS the City Council did, on December 10, 1998, approve Development Agreement 98-1 (adopted as Ordinance No. 888) (“DA 98-1”) with Marriott Ownership Resorts, Inc. for Marriott Shadow Ridge, a timeshare project; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert did on June 21, 2005, adopt Resolution No. 2338 approving an amendment to PP/CUP 98-5 for site plan and architectural modifications; and WHEREAS, the Project Site is has a General Plan Land Use Designation of Resort and Entertainment District and a Zoning Designation of Planned Residential – 5 dwelling units per acre and is subject to the requirements of Development Agreement 98-1 as amended by Palm Desert City Council Resolution No. 24-003 adopted on January 25, 2024; and WHEREAS, under Section 21067 of the Public Resources Code, Section 15367 of the State California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) Guidelines (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 14, § 15000 et seq.), and the City of Palm Desert’s (“City’s”) Local CEQA Guidelines, the City is the lead agency for the Project; and WHEREAS, in accordance with State CEQA Guidelines Section 15063, the City prepared an Initial Study to determine if the Project may have a significant effect on the environment and to evaluate whether an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was required; and 15 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2872 WHEREAS, State CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 (Public Resources Code §21083.3), provides that projects which are consistent with a Community Plan, General Plan, or Zoning for which an environmental impact report (EIR) has been certified “shall not require additional environmental review, except as might be necessary to examine whether there are project specific significant effects which are peculiar to the project or its site;” and WHEREAS, an Environmental Impact Report (SCH # 2015081020) was certified by the City of Palm Desert City Council for the 2040 Palm Desert General Plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the June 18, 2024, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider the request by the Applicant for the second amendment of PP/CUP 98-5; and WHEREAS, at the said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, the Planning Commission did find the following facts and reasons, which are outlined in the staff report exist to justify approval of said request; and WHEREAS, all other legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: SECTION 1. Recitals. The Planning Commission hereby finds that the foregoing recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein as substantive findings of this Resolution. SECTION 2. Findings on Conditional Use Permit. Under PDMC Section 25.72.050(F), the findings for the CUP are the following: 1. The proposed location of the conditional use is in accord with the objectives of this title and the purpose of the district in which the site is located. The proposed amendment is in accord with the objectives of this title and the purpose of the district in which the site is located. The proposed amendment would remove approximately 20.69-acres from an existing 306-acre site approved for timeshare land use. The portion of the site removed would have no longer be subject to the land use approvals and any future development would require approval subject to the requirements of the Resort and Entertainment District General Plan Land Use Design and Planned Residential Zoning Designation. The 20.69-acre site is anticipated to be developed as a 93-unit single-family residential tract (Case Nos. VTTM 38866 and PP23-0023) Much of the remaining area of the site subject to the PP/CUP) Notwithstanding this amendment, much of the 306- acre site has been developed with timeshares and would remain “as-is” and continue to under the existing PP/CUP as a conforming land use. 16 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2872 2. The proposed location of the conditional use and the conditions under which it would be operated or maintained will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or be materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The proposed amendment is not anticipated to be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or be materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The amendment would remove 20.69-acres from an existing 306-acre site approved for timeshare land use. Future development is anticipated to be a 93- unit single-family residential tract (Case Nos. VTTM 38866 and PP23-0023) the which will carried out in accordance with the Palm Desert General Plan, Zoning Ordinance, Subdivision Ordinance and other applicable requires which provide for the public welfare. 3. The proposed conditional use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of this title, except for approved variances or adjustments. The proposed amendment will comply with all applicable requirements of Title 25 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code. No variances or adjustments have been sought for this amendment. 4. The proposed conditional use complies with the goals, objectives, and policies of the City’s General Plan The subject property is designated Resort and Entertainment District per the General Plan Land Use Element. Amending the use permit will release the project site from current land use approvals and necessitate new approvals when new development occurs. Future development of the site will be reviewed for consistency with the City’s General Plan. SECTION 3. CEQA. The application has complied with the requirements of the “City of Palm Desert Procedure for Implementation of CEQA” Resolution No. 2019-41, in that the Planning Commission finds that the Project is consistent with the approved General Plan and Zoning Ordinance and that other project-specific impacts were evaluated in the Initial Study (15183 Analysis) prepared for the project and that no further environmental review is required under State CEQA Guidelines 15183. CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 allows for a streamlined environmental review process for projects, which are consistent with the development density established by existing zoning, community plan, or General Plan policies for which an EIR was certified, except as might be necessary to examine whether there are project-specific significant effects which are peculiar to the Project or its sites. If the above qualifications are met, as stated in Section 15183(b), “a public agency shall limit its examination of environmental effects to those which the agency determines, in an initial study or other analysis: (1) are peculiar to the Project or the parcel on which the Project would be located, (2) were not analyzed as significant effects in a prior EIR on the zoning action, General Plan or community plan, with which the Project is consistent, (3) are potentially significant off-site impacts, and cumulative impacts which were not discussed in the prior EIR prepared for the General Plan, community plan or zoning action, or the Project’s CEQA Section 15183 Analysis (4) are previously identified significant effects which, as a result of substantial new information, which was not known at the time the EIR was certified, are determined to have a more severe adverse impact than discussed in the prior EIR.” This 17 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2872 document has been prepared to satisfy the requirements of CEQA Guidelines Section 15183. It analyzes the potential environmental effects of the proposed Project and evaluates whether they were adequately analyzed in a prior EIR such that the above-identified streamlining criteria apply. The Project is consistent with the Palm Desert General Plan Update (General Plan Update), for which an EIR (SCH No. 2015081020) was certified. The General Plan Update provides a framework for future growth of the City and projects the development reasonably expected to occur during the buildout period. The Genal Plan Update EIR analyzed the environmental impacts associated with the adoption and implementation of the General Plan Update. The proposed Project is permitted in the zoning district where the Project site is located and consistent with the vision of the 2040 Palm Desert General Plan; and SECTION 4. Custodian of Records. The documents and materials that constitute the record of proceedings on which these findings are based are located at the City’s office at 73510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, CA 92260. Richard D. Cannone, AICP, the Secretary to the Palm Desert Planning Commission, is the custodian of the record of proceedings. SECTION 5. Project Approval. The Planning Commission approves Precise Plan/Conditional Use Permit 98-5 Amendment No. 2, subject to the Conditions of Approval attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and Resolution No. 98-108 attached as Exhibit “B” for reference purposes. SECTION 6. Execution of Resolution. The Chairperson of the Planning Commission signs this Resolution, and the Secretary to the Commission shall attest and certify to the passage and adoption thereof. ADOPTED ON June 18, 2024 JOSEPH PRADETTO CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: RICHARD D. CANNONE, AICP SECRETARY I, Richard D. Cannone, AICP, Secretary of the City of Palm Desert, hereby certify that Resolution No. 2872 is a full, true, and correct copy, and was duly adopted at a regular 18 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2872 meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert on June 18, 2024, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSED: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Palm Desert, California, on June 18, 2024. RICHARD D. CANNONE, AICP SECRETARY 19 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2872 EXHIBIT A CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO. PP/CUP 98-5 Amendment #2 PLANNING DIVISION: 1. Remainder Parcel 4, Remainder Parcel 5, and Lot “D” of Tract 28818-1 are released from the land use approvals granted by City Council Resolution No. 98 -108. Resolution No. 98-108, attached hereto as Exhibit B of this Resolution shall continue to apply to other areas of the site. 2. The Applicant agrees that in the event of any administrative, legal, or equitable action instituted by a third party challenging the validity of any of the procedures leading to the adoption of these project approvals for the Project, or the project approvals themselves, the Developer and City each shall have the right, in their sole discretion, to elect whether or not to defend such action. Developer, at its sole expense, shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City (in cluding its agents, officers, and employees) from any such action, claim, or proceeding with counsel chosen by the City, subject to the Developer’s approval of counsel, which shall not be unreasonably denied, and at the Developer’s sole expense. If the City is aware of such an action or proceeding, it shall promptly notify the Developer and cooperate in the defense. The Developer, upon such notification, shall deposit with City sufficient funds in the judgment of the City Finance Director to cover the expense of defending such action without any offset or claim against said deposit to assure that the City expends no City funds. If both Parties elect to defend, the Parties hereby agree to affirmatively cooperate in defending said action and to execute a joint defense and confidentiality agreement in order to share and protect the information under the joint defense privilege recognized under applicable law. As part of the cooperation in defending an action, City and Developer shall coordinate their defense in order to make the most efficient use of legal counsel and to share and protect information. Developer and City shall each have sole discretion to terminate its defense at any time. The City shall not settle any third-party litigation of project approvals without the Developer’s consent, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned, or delayed unless the Developer materially breaches this indemnification requirement. END OF CONDITIONS 20 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2872 EXHIBIT B CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 98-108 (Continued on Next Page) 21 22 RESOLUTION NO. 98-108 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PRECISE PLAN OF DESIGN, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP TO ALLOW DEVELOPMENT OF A 999 UNIT TIMESHARE RESORT, AN EXCEPTION TO THE BUILDING HEIGHT LIMIT IN THE PR (PLANNED RESIDENTIAL) ZONE AND A NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT AS IT RELATES THERETO TO BE LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF MONTEREY AVENUE BETWEEN FRANK SINATRA DRIVE AND GERALD FORD DRIVE. CASE NOS. PP/CUP 98-5 REVISED AND TT 28818 REVISED WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 10th day of September, 1998, hold a duly noticed public hearing which was continued to June 11, July 9, August 27, September 10, October 8, October 22 and November 12, 1998, to consider the request by MARRIOTT OWNERSHIP RESORT, INC., for the above mentioned project; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended approval by adoption of Planning Commission Resolution No. 1889; and WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedure for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 97-18, Director of Community Development has determined that the project as mitigated will not have a significant impact on the environment and a Negative Declaration has been prepared; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said City Council did find the following facts and reasons to exist to justify recommending approval of said precise plan, conditional use permit, and tentative tract map: PRECISE PLAN 1. The design of the precise plan will not substantially depreciate property values nor be materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 2. The precise plan will not unreasonably interfere with the use or enjoyment of property in the vicinity by the occupants thereof for lawful purposes. 3. The precise plan will not endanger the public peace, health, safety, or general welfare. CONDITIONAL USE 1. That the proposed location of the conditional use is in accord with the objectives of the Palm Desert Zoning Ordinance and the purpose of the district t. :: the site is located. 23 RESOLUTION NO. 98-108 2. That the proposed location of the conditional use and the conditions under which it would be operated or maintained will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or be materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the proposed conditional use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Palm Desert Zoning Ordinance, except for approved variances, adjustments or exceptions. 4. That the proposed conditional use complies with the goals, objectives, and policies of the City's General Plan. 5. The proposed timeshare resort witl operate "in conjunction with" the Desert Springs Marriott Resort, a hotel operating in the City of Palm Desert having more than 500 rooms. 6. The proposed timeshare resort will be located within an eighteen hole golf course of not less than six thousand four hundred (6,400) yards. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 1. 2. 3. 4. That tf e proposed tentative map is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. That the site is physically suitable for the type of development. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development. 5. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. 6. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems. 7. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. 8. The design will allow unrestricted solar access to all lots. 2 24 RESOLUTION NO. 98-108 WHEREAS, in the review of this tentative tract map the City Council has considered the effect of the contemplated action on the housing needs of the region for purposes of balancing these needs against the public service needs of the residents of the City of Palm Desert and its environs, with available fiscat and environmental resources. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1. 2 That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the Council in this case. That Precise Plan/Conditional Use Permit 98-5 Revised is hereby approved, subject to the attached conditions, Exhibit A. 3. That Tentative Map No. 28818 as revised on file in the Department of Community Development is hereby approved, subject to the attached conditions. 4. 5. That the maximum height of the three story buildings shall be 36 feet, subject to the conditions relating to setbacks. That a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact, Exhibit B attached, is hereby certified. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert City Council, held on this 12th day of November, 1998, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: T T: i%. ;. CRITES, FERGUSON, KELLY, SPIEGEL NONE NONE ROBERT A. SPIEGE SHEILA R.-GiLLIGANes;i r Clerk City of Palm Desert, fornia 3 25 RESOLUTION NO. 98-108 EXHIBIT A CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NOS. PP/CUP 98-5 REVISED AND TT 28818 REVISED Department of Community Development: 1. The development of the property shall conform substantially with revised exhibits on file with the Department of Community Development, as modified by the following conditions. 2. That the final map or portion thereof shall be recorded within two years from the date of approval unless an extension of time is granted; otherwise, said approval shall become null, void and of no effect whatsoever. 3. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein which are in addition to all municipal ordinances and state and federal statutes now in force, or which hereafter may be in force. 4. Prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contemplated by this approval, the app(icant shall first obtain permits and/or clearance from the following agencies: Coachella Valley Water District Palm Desert Architectural Commission City Fire Marshal Public Works Department Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to the department of building and safety at the time of issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. 5. All future occupants of the buildings shall comply with parking requirements of the ordinance. 6. Marketing practices shall not include street solicitation. 7. Advertising shall strictly adhere to Palm Desert's Zoning Ordinance Chapter 25.68 pertaining to signage. 8. Access to trash/service areas shall be placed so as not to conflict with parking areas. Said placement shall be approved by applicable trash company and Department of Community Development. 4 26 RESOLUTION NO. 98-108 O 9. Shouid the applicant/owner choose to create an illuminated parking lot(s) or illuminate the building exteriors, a detailed parking lot and/or building lighting plan shall be r, submitted for staff approval, subject io applicable lighting standards, plans to be prepared by a qualified lighting engineer. 10. All sidewalk plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works prior to Architectural Review Commission review of final landscape plan. 1 1. Project is subject to Art in Public Places program per Palm Desert Municipal Code Chapter 4.10. 12. Final landscape plans shall comply with the parking lot tree planting master plan. 13. Applicant agrees to maintain the landscaping equired to be installed pursuant to these conditions. Applicant will enter into an agreement to maintain said landscaping for the life of the project, which agreement shall be notarized and which agreement shall be recorded. It is the specific intent of the parties that this condition and agreement run with the land and bind successors and assigns. The final landscape plan shall include a long-term maintenance program specifying, among other matter, appropriate watering times, fertilization and pruning for various times of the year for the specific materials to be planted, as well as periodic replacement of materials. All to be consistent with the Property Maintenance Ordinance (Ordinance No. 801) and the approved landscape plan. 14. The project shall be subject to all applicable fees at time of issuance of permits including, but not limited to, Art in Public Places, TUMF and school mitigation fees and low income housing mitigation fee. 15. That the site grading plan be designed to lower the site at least two (2) feet in the area west and northwest of the homes on Drexell Drive. Said two (2) foot lowering of the site shall be relative to the existing grade in the area where the buildings are to be located or relative to the existing grade in the rear yards of the homes on the west side of Drexell Drive, whichever provides the greater protection to the views from the homes on the west side of Drexell Drive. 16. That all mitigation measures contained in the traffic study dated May 14, 1998, prepared by Nickerson, Diercks and Associates shall be conditions of this approval. 17. That the design of the east end of the buildings nearest the homes on Drexell Drive shall not include windows or balconies facing east. 18. That the golf course, clubhouse, and sales center be constructed as part of phase 1. 5 27 RESOLUTION NO. 98-108 19. That the three story buildings shall not exceed 36 feet in height and shall be setback a minimum of 340 feet from the residential property lines adjacent to the K& B development. 20. That the perimeter fence design include wrought iron openings to create view corridors into the golf course. 21. That the parking for the timeshare units shall be at a ratio of 1.5 spaces per unit with at least one space per unit covered. 22. That the design of the maintenance building include sufficient parking on site for all employees of that facility. 23. That any conversion of the project or any unit within the project to other than timeshare or transient tourist use must first obtain approval by the City in consultation with the Palm Springs Unified School District or such school district which is serving the property at that time. 24. That the applicant pay a day care mitigation fee of 5100,000 to the City. 25. That shuttle vehicles connecting this project to the Desert Springs Marriott shall be alternate energy vehicles. € Department of Public Works: 1. Drainage fees in accordance with Palm Desert Municipa! Code Section 26.49 and Ordinance No. 653 shall be paid prior to recordation of the final map. 2. Any drainage facility construction required for this project shall be contingent upon a drainage study prepared by a registered civil engineer that is reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works prior to start of construction. The project shall be designed to retain stormwaters associated with the increase in developed vs. undeveloped condition for a 100 year storm. 3. Signalization fees, in accordance with City of Palm Desert Resolution Nos. 79-17 and 79-55, shall be paid prior to issuance of any permits associated with this project. The costs associated with the installation of new traffic signal and modification of existing signal systems for this project may be used as a credit against the subject signalization fees. Such a credit would be subject to approval by the Palm Desert City Council. 4. The project shall be subject to Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fees (TUMF) Payment of said fees shall be at the time of grading/building permit issuance. 0 28 RESOLUTION NO. 98-108 5. A complete preliminary soils investigation, conducted by a registered soils engineer, shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Department of Public Works prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 6. Complete tract map shall be submitted as required by ordinance to the Director of Public Works for checking and approval prior to the issuance of any permits associated with this project. 7. As required under Palm Desert Municipal Code Section 26.28, and in accordance with Sections 26.40 and 26.44, complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted to the Director of Public Works for checking and approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. Offsite improvement plans to be approved by the Public Works Department and a surety posted to guarantee the installation of required offsite improvements prior to permit issuance. 8. All public and private improvements shall be inspected by the Department of Public Works and a standard inspection fee shall be paid prior to issuance of grading permits. 9. In accordance with the Circulation Network of the Palm Desert General Plan, installation of landscaped median island in Monterey Avenue from Gerald Ford Drive south to a point southerly of the mid-section line of Section 32 shall be provided. In addition, applicant shall provide for the installation of landscape improvements within the existing median islands in Frank Sinatra Drive and Gerald Ford Drive. Landscape shall be drought tolerant in nature. 10. Landscape installation on the property frontages shall be drought tolerant in nature and maintenance shall be provided by the property owner. Landscaping maintenance for the proposed median island improvements shall be provided through a landscape and lighting maintenance district. Applicant shall be responsible for the formation of said district. 11. Full public improvements, as required by Sections 26.40 and 26.44 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code, shall be installed in accordance with applicable City standards. In addition to the above noted items, those traffic impact mitigation measures identified in the project Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by Nickerson, Diercks & Associates/Valley Research and Planing Associates shall be provided. The subject report and proposed mitigation measures shall be approved by the Public Works Department. Residential street sections shall be as shown on the tentative tract map with a minimum width of thirty-two feet. Rights-of-way as may be necessary for the construction of required public improvements shall be provided on the Tract Map. r.. 7 29 RESOLUTION NO. 98-108 12. Applicant shall comply with the provisions of Municipal Code Section 24.12, Fugitive Dust Control as wel as Section 24.20, Stormwater Management and Discharge Control. 13. Any and all offsite improvements shal! be preceded by the approval of plans and the issuance of valid encroachment permits by the Department of Public Works. 14. In accordance with Palm Desert Municipal Code Section 26.44, complete grading plans/site improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted to the Director of Public Works for checking and approval prior to issuance of any permits. 15. Traffic safety striping on Monterey Avenue, Gerald Ford Drive and Frank Sinatra Drive and the proposed residential streets shall be provided to the specifications of the Director of Public Works. A traffic control plan must be submitted to, and approved by, the Director of Public Works prior to the placement of any pavement markings. 16. Proposed building pad elevations are subject to review and modification in accordance with Chapter 27 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code. 17. As required under Sections 26.32 and 26.40 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code, all existing overhead utilities shall be placed underground per the respective utility district recommendation. 18. Waiver of access rights to Monterey Avenue, Frank Sinatra Drive and Gerald Ford Drive except at approved locations shall be granted on the Tract Map. 19. Prior to start of construction, the applicant shall submit satisfactory evidence to the Director of Public Works of intended compliance with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination (NPDES) General Permit (Permit # CAS000002) for storm water discharges associated with construction. 20. All project access points shall provide for acceleration and deceleration lanes. Existing medians on Frank Sinatra Drive and Gerald Ford Drive shall be modified to provide for full project ingress/egress. E 3 30 RESOLUTION NO. 98-108 Riverside County Fire Department: 1. With respect to the conditions of approval regarding the above referenced plan check, the Fire Department recommends the following fire protection measures be provided in accordance with City Municipal Codes, appropriate NFPA standards, CFC, CBC, and/or recognized fire protection standards. The Fire Department is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commercial buildings per California Fire Code Sec. 10.401. 2. A fire flow of 1500 gpm for a 1 hour duration at 20 psi residual operating pressure must be available before any combustibie materials are placed on the job site. 3. Provide, or show there exists, a water system capable of providing a potential 2500 for multifamily and 3000 for commercial structure. The actual fire flow available from any one hydrant connected to any given water main shall be 1500 gpm for two hours duration at 20 psi residual operating pressure. 4. The required fire flow shall be available from a Super hydrant(s) (6"x4"x2 %Z " x 2%Z "), located not less than 25' or more than 165 feet from multifamily and 150 feet commercial from any portion of the building(s) as measured along approved vehicular travelways. Hydrants installed below 3000 feet elevation shall be of the "wet barrel" type. t• 5. Prior to the application for a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and two copies of the water system plan to the County Fire Department for review. No building permit shall be issued until the water system plan has been approved by the County Fire Chief. Upon approval, the original will be returned. One copy will be sent to the responsible inspecting authority. 6. Comply with Title 24 of the California Code of Reguiations, adopted January 1, 1990, for all occupancies. 7. Install a complete fire sprinkler system per NFPA 13 R. The post indicator valve and fire department connection shall be located to the front, not less than 25' from the building and within 50' of an approved hydrant. This applies to all buildings with 3000 square feet or more building area as measured by the building footprint, including overhangs which are sprinklered per NFPA 13. The building area of additional floors is added in for a cumulative total. Exempted are one and two family dwellings. 0 31 RESOLUTION NO. 98-108 OTHER: NFPA 13R plus special provisions of fire sprinklers in attics and protect exit ways on second floor. 8. Install a fire alarm (water flow) as required by the Uniform Building Code 3803 for sprinkler system. Install tamper alarms on all supply and control valves for sprinkler systems. 9. Certain designated areas will be required to be maintained as fire lanes and shall be clearly marked by painting and/or signs approved by the Fire Marshal. 10. Install a fire alarm as required by the Uniform Building Code and/or Uniform Fire Code. Minimum requirement is UL central station monitoring of sprinkler system per NFPA 71 and 72. Alarm plans are required for all UL central station monitored systems, systems where any interior devices are required or used. (U.F.C. 14-103(a)) 1 1. Install portable fire extinguishers per NFPA, Pamphlet #10, but not less than 2A10BC in rating. Fire extinguishers must not be over 75' walking distance. In addition to the above, a 406C fire extinguisher is required for commercial kitchens. 12. All buildings shall be accessible by an all-weather roadway extending to within 150' ; of all portions of the exterior walls of the first story. The roadway shall be not less than 24' of unobstructed width and 13'6" of vertical clearance. Where parallel parking is allowed, the roadway shall be 36' wide with parking on both sides, 32' wide with parking on one side. Dead-end roads in excess of 150' shall be provided with a minimum 45' radius turn-around (55' in industrial developments). Fountains or garden islands placed in the middle of these turn-arounds shall not exceed a 5' radius or 10' diameter. City standards may be more restrictive. 13. Whenever access into private property is controlled through use of gates, barriers, guard houses or similar means, provision shall be made to facilitate access by emergency vehicles in a manner approved by the Fire Department. All controlled access devices that are power operated shall have a Knox Box over-ride system capable of opening the gate when activated by a special key locate din emergency vehicles. Devices shall be equipped with backup power facilities to operate in the even of power failure. All controlled access devices that are not power operated shall also be approved by the Fire Department. Minimum opening width shall be 16' with a minimum vertical clearance of 13'6". 14. A dead end single access over 500' in length will require a secondary access, sprinklers or other mitigative measure approved by the Fire Marshal. Under no circumstances shal! a single dead end access over 1300 feet be accepted. 10 32 RESOLUTION NO. 98-108 15. A second access is required. This can be accomplished by two main access points from main roadway or an emergency gated access into an adjoining development. 16. Contact the Fire Department for a final inspection prior to occupancy. 17. All new residences/dwellings are required to have illuminated esidential addresses meeting both City and Fire Department approval. Shake shingle roofs are no longer permitted in the cities of Indian Wells, Rancho Mirage or Palm Desert. 18. Commercial buildings shall have illuminated addresses of a size approved by the city. 19. All fire sprinkler systems, fixed fire suppression syster s and alarm plans must be submitted separately for approval prior to construction. Subcontractors should contact the Fire Marshal's office for submittal requirements. Orr 33 RESOLUTION NO. 98-108 EXHIBIT B Pursuant to Title 14, Division 6, Article 6(commencing with section 15070) of the California Code of Regulations. NEGATIVE DECLARATION CASE NOS: PP/CUP 98-5 Revised and TT 28818 Revised APPLICANT/PROJECT SPONSOR: Marriott Ownership Resort, Inc. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/LOCATION: An 18-hole golf course, 999 unit timeshare resort and amenities on 306 ± acres on the east side of Monterey Avenue between Frank Sinatra Drive and Gerald Ford Drive. rr r The Director of the Department of Community Development, City of Palm Desert, California, has found that the described project will not have a significant effect on the environment. A copy of the Initial Study has been attached to document the reasons in support of this finding. Mitigation measures, if any, included in the project to avoid potentially significant effects, may also be found attached. N vember 12 199 P IP DRE L DATE DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 12 34 C I T Y O F P A L M D E S E R T 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260-2578 TEL: 760-346-0611 PLANNING@PALMDESERT.GOV CITY OF PALM DESERT PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE CASE NO. CUP24-0005 (PP/CUP 98-5 Amendment) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, TO CONSIDER A REQUEST FOR AMENDMENT TO PRECISE PLAN AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 98-5 TO RELEASE A PORTION OF THE MARRIOTT SHADOW RIDGE PROPERTY FROM THESE LAND USE APPROVALS AND FINDING THE PROJECT IS EXEMPT FROM FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT The City of Palm Desert (City), in its capacity as the Lead Agency for this project and pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), has determined the project to be exempt from further environmental review pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section §15183 – Projects Consistent with a Community Plan or Zoning PROJECT LOCATION: Assessor’s Parcel Numbers (APNs) 694-290-010, -011, 694-320-010, and -011. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The proposal is a request by Marriott Ownership Resorts, Inc. (Applicant) to amend PP/CUP 98-5 approved by City Council Resolution No.108 by removing a portion of the site from the original land use approvals of the existing Precise Plan (PP) and Conditional Use Permit (CUP). The proposal will remove approximately 20.69-acres located on Remainder Parcel Nos. 4 and 5, and Lot D of Tract No. 28818, from the PP and CUP approvals. The PP and CUP would remain in effect on the other remaining portions of the Marriott Shadow Ridge Development. PUBLIC HEARING: NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, will hold a Public Hearing on Tuesday, June 18, 2024. The Planning Commission meeting begins at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber at 73510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California. Pursuant to Assembly Bill 2449, this meeting may be conducted as a hybrid meeting, allowing public access via teleconference or in person. Options for remote participation will be listed on the Posted Agenda for the meeting at: https://www.palmdesert.gov/connect/committees-and-commissions/planning-commission. PUBLIC REVIEW: Information concerning the project is available for public review in the Development Services – Planning Division office at 73510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California, during regular business hours. Written comments may be submitted to the Planning Commission by letter to the address below or by email at planning@palmdesert.gov. Emails received by 3:00 p.m. prior to the meeting will be distributed to the Commission. Any correspondence received during or after the meeting will be distributed to the Commission as soon as practicable and retained for the official record. Any challenge of the proposed project in court may be limited to raising only those issues raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Division at, or prior, to the public hearing. (Government Code Section 65009[b][2]). Nick Melloni, AICP, Principal Planner City of Palm Desert 73510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 (760) 346-0611, Extension 479 nmellloni@palmdesert.gov PUBLISH: THE DESERT SUN RICHARD D. CANNONE, AICP, SECRETARY June 7, 2024 PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 Notice of Exemption FORM “B” NOTICE OF EXEMPTION TO: Office of Planning and Research P. O. Box 3044, Room 113 Sacramento, CA 95812-3044 FROM: City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 Clerk of the Board of Supervisors or County Clerk County of: Riverside 2724 Gateway Dr, Riverside, CA 92507 1. Project Title: CUP24-0005 (PP/CUP 98-5 Amendment) 2. Project Applicant: Marriott Ownership Resorts, Inc. 3. Project Location – Identify street address and cross streets or attach a map showing project site (preferably a USGS 15’ or 7 1/2’ topographical map identified by quadrangle name): 9003 Shadow Ridge Road / Assessor Parcel Numbers 694-290-010, -011, 694-320-010, and -011 4. (a) Project Location – City: Palm Desert (b) Project Location – County: Riverside 5. Description of nature, purpose, and beneficiaries of Project: A request for amendment to remove approximately 20.69-acres from existing land use entitlements for a timeshare development 6. Name of Public Agency approving project: City of Palm Desert 7. Name of Person or Agency undertaking the project, including any person undertaking an activity that receives financial assistance from the Public Agency as part of the activity or the person receiving a lease, permit, license, certificate, or other entitlement of use from the Public Agency as part of the activity: Marriott Ownership Resorts, Inc. 8. Exempt status: (check one) (a) Ministerial project. (Pub. Res. Code § 21080(b)(1); State CEQA Guidelines § 15268) (b) Not a project. (c) Emergency Project. (Pub. Res. Code § 21080(b)(4); State CEQA Guidelines § 15269(b),(c)) (d) Categorical Exemption. State type and section number: State CEQA Guidelines §15332 – Class 32 In-fill project (e) Declared Emergency. (Pub. Res. Code § 21080(b)(3); State CEQA Guidelines § 15269(a)) (f) Statutory Exemption. State Code section number: (g) Other. Explanation: Projects Consistent with Community Plan, General Plan, or Zoning - State CEQA Guidelines § 15183 9. Reason why project was exempt: CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 allows for a streamlined environmental review process for projects, which are 51 Notice of Exemption FORM “B” consistent with the development density established by existing zoning, community plan, or general plan policies for which an EIR was certified, except as might be necessary to examine whether there are project- specific significant effects, which are peculiar to the project or its sites. If the above qualifications are met, as stated in Section 15183(b), “a public agency shall limit its examination of environmental effects to those which the agency determines, in an initial study or other analysis: (1) are peculiar to the project or the parcel on which the project would be located, (2) were not analyzed as significant effects in a prior EIR on the zoning action, general plan, or community plan, with which the project is consistent, (3) are potentially significant off-site impacts and cumulative impacts which were not discussed in the prior EIR prepared for the general plan, community plan or zoning action, or the Project’s CEQA Section 15183 Analysis (4) are previously identified significant effects which, as a result of substantial new information which was not known at the time the EIR was certified, are determined to have a more severe adverse impact than discussed in the prior EIR.” An analysis of the project was prepared to satisfy the requirements of CEQA Guidelines Section 15183. It analyzes the potential environmental effects of the proposed project and evaluates whether they were adequately analyzed in a prior EIR such that the above-identified streamlining criteria apply. The project is consistent with the Palm Desert General Plan Update (General Plan Update), for which an EIR (SCH # 2015081020) was certified. The General Plan Update provides a framework for future growth of the City and projects the development reasonably expected to occur during the buildout period. The Genal Plan Update EIR analyzed the environmental impacts associated with the adoption and implementation of the General Plan Update. The proposed project is permitted in the zoning district where the project site is located and consistent with the land uses, density, and vision of the General Plan Update. The evaluation determined that either no impact or less than significant impacts would be associated with the proposed project. The proposed subdivision project is being undertaken in conformity with the approved 2016 General Plan Resort and Entertainment land use designation. The proposed project will be consistent with applicable zoning development standards and the General Plan. There are no substantial changes in the project from those analyzed in the 2016 General Plan EIR. 10. Lead Agency Contact Person: Nick Melloni, Principal Planner Telephone: (760) 346-0611 11. If filed by applicant: Attach Preliminary Exemption Assessment (Form “A”) before filing. 12. Has a Notice of Exemption been filed by the public agency approving the project? ⁭ Yes ⁭ No 13. Was a public hearing held by the lead agency to consider the exemption? ⁭ Yes ⁭ No If yes, the date of the public hearing was: June 18, 2024 Signature: Date: June 18, 2024 Title: Principal Planner ⁭ Signed by Lead Agency ⁭ Signed by Applicant Date Received for Filing: (Clerk Stamp Here) 52 Notice of Exemption FORM “B” Authority cited: Sections 21083 and 21100, Public Resources Code. Reference: Sections 21108, 21152, and 21152.1, Public Resources Code. 53 54 PP/CUP 98-5 Amendment Shadow Ridge PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 18, 2024 6/18/2024 AGENDA ITEM 8.B 1 55 Project Request Case Nos.: PP/CUP 98-5 Amendment Project Applicant: Mariott Consideration: Consideration of approval Project Description: Removal of portions of site from entitlement approval to satisfy Development Agreement Related Cases: PP/CUP 98-5 Amendment #2 AGENDA ITEM 8.B6/18/2024 2 56 Project Site Description General Plan Land Use Designation: Resort and Entertainment District (RED) Zoning Designation: Planned Residential – 5 Dwelling Units Per Acre (PR-5) Existing Land Use: Vacant, Timeshare, Golf-course Proposed Use: Single-family – Permitted AGENDA ITEM 8.B6/18/2024 3 Surrounding Area Existing Uses General Plan Zoning North Commercial Retail/Single Family Regional Retail Center/Town Center Neighborhood (TCN) District Planned Commercial (PC-2)/PR South Mobile Home Park Golf Course Resort Neighborhood (GCRN)PR-5 East Vacant TCN Refuge Specific Plan West Vacant – Approved Mixed Use (Cotino) City of Rancho Mirage (Mixed-Use) City of Rancho Mirage Section 31 Specific Plan 57 Vicinity Map AGENDA ITEM 8.B6/18/2024 4 58 AGENDA ITEM 8.B6/18/2024 5 59 Background – Development Agreement Existing Development Agreement 98-1 in Place since 1998 for approval of a 999 unit timeshare development and 18-hole golf course on the site. On January 25, 2024, the City Council adopted a Second Amendment to the DA to establish termination provisions for the DA on the project site. AGENDA ITEM 8.B6/18/2024 6 60 Public Hearing Notices sent to all property owners within 1,000’ of the site. No comments in favor or opposition to the project. AGENDA ITEM 8.B6/18/2024 7 61 CEQA Project is exempt from further review pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 Project is consistent with the Palm Desert General Plan and Zoning Initial Study prepared which examined the project. AGENDA ITEM 8.B6/18/2024 8 62 Recommendation AGENDA ITEM 8.B6/18/2024 9 1.Adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 2872 entitled, “A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A SECOND AMENDMENT OF PRECISE PLAN AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 98-5 APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 98-108 TO RELEASE DESIGNATED REMAINDER PARCELS 4 AND 5 OF TRACT 28818-1 FROM THE APPROVALS FOR THE MARRIOTT SHADOW RIDGE PROJECT LOCATED AT 9003 SHADOW RIDGE ROAD GENERALLY SOUTH OF GERALD FORD DRIVE AND EAST OF MONTEREY AVENUE AND FINDING THE PROJECT IS EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA)” CASE NO. CUP24-0005 (PP/CUP 98-5 Amendment No. 2) With Added Condition 63 Recommendation #1 AGENDA ITEM 8.B6/18/2024 10 Add Condition #3 This amendment shall be contingent upon termination of Development Agreement 98-1 on Designated Remainder Parcel 4, Designated Remainder Parcel 5, and Lot “D” of Tract 28818-1 amended by City Council Resolution No. 24-003. The applicant shall provide written proof of termination of the Development Agreement to the Development Services Department. 64 Page 1 of 14 CITY OF PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MEETING DATE: June 18, 2024 PREPARED BY: Nick Melloni, AICP, Principal Planner REQUEST: CONSIDERATION OF A VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP AND PRECISE PLAN TO DEVELOP A 93-UNIT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVSION WITHIN MARRIOTT SHADOW RIDGE AND FINDING THE PROJECT IS EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) RECOMMENDATION: 1. Adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 2873 entitled, “A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 38866 TO SUBDIVIDE APPROXIMATELY 20.69 - ACRES INTO 93 NUMBERED LOTS, AND 13 LETTERED LOTS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY WITH PRIVATE OPEN SPACE, LANDSCAPE AND VEHICULAR ACCESS LOCATED ON SHADOW RIDGE ROAD GENERALLY SOUTH OF GERALD FORD DRIVE AND EAST OF MONTEREY AVENUE AND FINDING THE PROJECT IS EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA).” CASE NO. VTTM 38866 (TTM23-0005) 2. Adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 2874 entitled, “A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PRECISE PLAN FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 93 UNIT SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION LOCATED ON SHADOW RIDGE ROAD WITHIN THE EXISTING MARRIOTT SHADOW RIDGE DEVELOPMENT, AND FINDING THAT THE PROJECT IS EXEMPT FROM FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT.” CASE NO. PP23-0023 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant, Toll Brothers, has applied for Planning Commission (PC) approval of a Vesting Tentative Tract Map (VTTM) and Precise Plan (PP) for the development of a 93 -lot single-family residential subdivision, as outlined in Section 6.6 of the Second Amendment DA 98 -1 on the vacant 20.69-acre site within the Marriott Shadow Ridge Development located on Assessor Parcel Numbers 694-290-010, -011, 694-320-010, and -011 (Project Site). The approval of CUP24-0005 authorizes the consideration of these applications. The VTTM will subdivide the site into 93 numbered lots for single -family residential use, and 13 lettered lots for gated private streets, and common areas including open space, landscaping and storm water retention. The PP will establish the development standards, preliminary architecture, and preliminary landscape designs for private entry gates, private common area lots, front yard 65 City of Palm Desert – Planning Commission Case Nos. VTTM 38866 / PP23-0023 – Toll Brothers Shadow Ridge Page 2 of 14 typical landscaping, and a fence and wall plan. The project is exempt from further review per the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 as the project is consistent with the Palm Desert General Plan. The proposed improvements comply with applicable development standards for the Planned Residential (PR) Zoning Designation and findings can be made for approval of the project. Adoption of staff recommendation will adopt resolutions approving the VTTM and PP. The decision of the PC is final unless a formal request for appeal is made to the City Council. The Vesting Tentative Tract Map shall only become effective when all requirements of Section 6.6 of the Second Amendment of DA 98-1 have been met. The sale of the property from Marriott to Toll Brothers, Inc. is contingent upon approval of this entitlement. ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION The Design Review for the project (DR23-0023) appeared before the Architectural Review Commission of the City of Palm Desert (ARC) on April 9, 2024, and May 14, 2024. The ARC approved the Design Review on May 14, 2024, in a 6-0 vote with Commissioner Blakeley absent subject to the following conditions: 1. Columns shown on rear porches shall be based off the originally proposed “L” shape and shall be squared off to create a larger mass. 2. Entry wall pilasters shall have stone veneer reverted to precision block or alternate material. These comments have been incorporated as condition of approval on the PP for the project and will be addressed by the Applicant during the building plan reviews. The applicant addressed the ARC conditions on the block wall in an updated Preliminary Landscape Plan dated June 10, 2024. BACKGROUND In December 1998, the Palm Desert City Council approved a Development Agreement (“DA 98 - 1”) with Marriott Ownership Resorts, Inc. (“Marriott”) by Ordinance 888 and approved a Precise Plan/Conditional Use Permit (PP/CUP 98-5) and Tentative Tract Map 28818 as Resolution No. 98-108 for the development of the Marriott Shadow Ridge Golf Club, located on approximately 306 acres at the southeast corner of Monterey Avenue and Gerald Ford Drive . The agreement approved the development of an 18 -hole golf course with approximately 999 timeshare units to be completed in multiple phases. Additionally, under the terms of the agreement, Marriott was required to remit a facilities fee to the City for a period of 20 years. The initial 20-year term of the DA was extended through December 2030 by the first DA amendment adopted under Ordinance No. 1320. Marriott Shadow Ridge is partially developed and has remaining vacant pads in the eastern portions of the development. The original site plan approved by the City for the Marriott Time Shares is shown in Figure 1 for reference purposes as outlined in red. (Continued on next page) 66 City of Palm Desert – Planning Commission Case Nos. VTTM 38866 / PP23-0023 – Toll Brothers Shadow Ridge Page 3 of 14 Figure 1 – Marriott Shadow Ridge Preliminary Site Plan (for Reference Only) In 2020, Marriot approached the City and expressed that the timeshare market is saturated in the Coachella Valley and stated their intent to pursue other options for vacant portions of Shadow Ridge, including the development of single-family homes. In late 2022, Marriott returned to the City with a proposal to convert roughly 20 acres of undeveloped land located on the remainder Parcels 4 and 5, and Lot “D” of TR 28818-1 to 93 single-family homes rather than the remaining timeshare units. Amended Development Agreement On January 25, 2024, the City Council adopted Resolution 24-0003 approving a second amendment of the Development Agreement to facilitate the development of the residential tract on the site by allowing termination of the development agreement on the parcels, subject to conditions. These conditions are specifically outlined in Section 6 Termination, subsection 6.6: a) That Marriot provide a copy of the grant deed showing that the property has been conveyed to Toll Bros, Inc., or a single purpose development entity controlled by Toll Bros, Inc. b) Payment of $1.6 million dollars from the proceeds of the land sale, which will be in lieu of the Weekly Facilities Fee which was to be paid to the City by Marriott for the Shadow Ridge Development. c) That Marriott obtain approval of a modification of the Precise Plan/Conditional Use Permit releasing the Subject Property from the requirements of Resolution No. 98 - 108. Upon satisfaction of the conditions of Subsection 6.6, the Development Agreement may be terminated, and allow the development of the 93 unit residential subdivision on the subject site. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION a) Property Location/Description: The project site is a 20.69-acre property within the 67 City of Palm Desert – Planning Commission Case Nos. VTTM 38866 / PP23-0023 – Toll Brothers Shadow Ridge Page 4 of 14 Marriott Shadow Ridge comprised of four (4) sep arate parcels. Primary and secondary access to the project site is provided from Shadow Ridge Road, a private street which runs through the property and connects to Monterey Avenue to the west, and Gerald Ford Drive to the north. The areas immediately surrounding the site are developed with an 18- hole golf course, and existing timeshares and clubhouse areas are located further beyond to the west and south. The site is vacant and has been rough graded and disturbed in the past. It is currently characterized by scattered desert shrubs and blow sand deposits, with portions of the site being utilized for storage related to the operation of the existing golf course and timeshares near the site. b) Existing Adjacent Uses, General Plan and Zoning: Table 1 – Adjacent Land Use and Designations Existing Uses General Plan Zoning Project Site Time Share Development Resort and Entertainment District (RED) Planned Residential Five (5) dwelling units per acre (PR- 5) North Commercial Retail/Single Family Regional Retail Center/Town Center Neighborhood (TCN) District Planned Commercial (PC-2) / PR South Mobile Home Park Golf Course Resort Neighborhood (GCRN) PR-5 East Vacant TCN Refuge Specific Plan West Vacant – Approved Mixed Use (Cotino) City of Rancho Mirage (Mixed-Use) City of Rancho Mirage Section 31 Specific Plan PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The proposed project is a request to develop the 20-69-acre project site into a subdivision containing 93 single-family detached homes with private streets, open space, and landscape area. The subdivision will be comprised of 93 “numbered” lots for single -family land uses and 13 “lettered” lots to be used for common open space and private streets. Table 2 below provides a land use summary of the development: Table 2 – Land Use Summary Lot Description Proposed Land Use Approximate Area Lots 1 – 93 Residential 15.75-acres Lots “A” – “F” Private Street and Motor Court 3.36-acres Lots “G” – “L” Landscape and Open Space 1.24-acres Lot “M” Master Association Dedication 0.10-acres The zoning designation of the project site is Planned Residential (PR), which requires new residential developments to establish project specific development standards when subdividing a site. These development standards will be specific to the subdivision and future additions to any of the units must comply with the standards. The development has proposed the 68 City of Palm Desert – Planning Commission Case Nos. VTTM 38866 / PP23-0023 – Toll Brothers Shadow Ridge Page 5 of 14 development standards listed in Table 3. The net area of the site (not including right-of-way dedications, will be approximately 17-acres. Table 3 – Proposed Development Standards Development Standard Minimum Proposed Requirement Lot Standards Minimum Lot Area (Square-Feet) 5,500 SF Minimum Lot Width (Feet) 50’-0” Minimum Lot Depth (Feet) 110’-0” Building Standards Front Yard – Living Area (Feet) 10’-0” Front Yard – Garage (Feet) 18’-0” Side Yard - Interior and Street (Feet) 5’-0” Rear Yard (Feet) 10’-0” Maximum Building Height (Feet) 18’-0” Maximum Lot Coverage (Percentage) 52% The 93 residential lots will adhere to a minimum standard dimension of 55’ wide by 110’ deep and minimum parcel area of 5,500-square-feet which is being proposed by the applicant as a part of the project. These lots will vary in size up to a maximum of 10,451-square-feet. The applicant has requested that the allowable maximum height for the development is 18’-0” to allow single-story dwellings. This is taller than the building architecture presented by approximately 3’-0” but is requested to allow projections for future development by future homeowners. Site Plan The site plan (Figure 1) shows the architectural site plan of the project. The units will be located along the proposed main private roadway. A new gate will be installed at the western boundary of the tract. The project includes onsite private open space including passive open space with shade structure, walking paths, and turf area. The rear yards of each unit are fenced with tubular steel “view fencing” with open views towards the golf course. A 4’-6” sidewalk will be provided for pedestrian connection to the Shadow Ridge Golf Club. The typical site plan and floor plan for a Plan Type 1 is provided in Figure 3 showing examples of additional site features such as outdoor living space, swimming pool location, and HVAC location in the side yard. (Continued on next page) 69 City of Palm Desert – Planning Commission Case Nos. VTTM 38866 / PP23-0023 – Toll Brothers Shadow Ridge Page 6 of 14 Figure 2 – Site Plan Overview Architecture The proposed project architecture was approved by the ARC as a part of the Design Review on May 14, 2024. The project will provide three (3) one-story building plans with three (3) options which provide a third car garage, summarized in Table 4 below: Table 3 – Plan Type Summary Plan Type Quantity Floor Area Square-Feet (SF) Maximum Building Height Bedroom Bath 1 1x 31 2,216 SF 2,420 SF 14’-10” (Contemporary) 15’-1” (International) 3 3.5 2 2x 31 - 2,328 SF 2,759 SF 14’-10” (Contemporary) 15’-1” (International) 3 3.5 3 3X 31 - 2,425 SF 2,737 sf 14-10” (Contemporary) 15’-1” (International) 3 3.5 Each plan type will provide a larger “X” option which will feature additional garage area and other floor area. Each plan type will have two styles of architectural treatments including “International” and “Contemporary”. All plan types will have options for additions i ncluding outdoor covered patio space (“Outdoor Living Room”) and Golf Car Garage space, which may be provided depending on the lot size and ability to comply with minimum development standards. The architectural style is generally contemporary and characterized by rectangular massing with flat roofs, with varying rooflines. The exterior material palette consists of stucco and stone veneer which are finished with a neutral color palette comprised of tan, taupe, light grey and dark grey trim colors. The windows along front elevations are typically recessed 1’-0” or are provided overhangs for passive shading. An example “street scene” showing all variations of the project architecture is provided in Figure 3 below. The maximum height of the building architecture presented is 15’-1” below the 18’-0” height limit proposed by the applicant. 70 City of Palm Desert – Planning Commission Case Nos. VTTM 38866 / PP23-0023 – Toll Brothers Shadow Ridge Page 7 of 14 Figure 3 – Street Scene Architecture Landscaping The preliminary landscaping plan provides details on the proposed landscap e palette for common open space areas, front yard typical conditions, and site design for the entry gates, and a fence and wall plan. The design was approved by the ARC as a part of the Design Review approval on May 14, 2024. Landscape Palette Sheets L2.1, L2.2 and L4.3 provide an overview of the live landscape materials proposed in the development which consist of desert appropriate trees and shrubs, succulents, and cacti. Palettes are provided for the common open space and front yard typical condition. Trees include: Arizona Ash, Desert Ironwood, Afghan Pine, Chinese Pistache, Thornless Honey Mesquite and Date Palms. Specimen sizes will range from 24” box up to 36” box for the Thornless Honey 71 City of Palm Desert – Planning Commission Case Nos. VTTM 38866 / PP23-0023 – Toll Brothers Shadow Ridge Page 8 of 14 Mesquite. The Date Palm will be installed at a 10’ brown tr unk height (BTH). The front yard typical landscape plan will generally provide a minimum of two (2) 24” box shade trees in the front yard, in addition to live plantings, and a large accent shrub. Shrubs include: Quail Bush, Bougainvillea, Red Bird of Paradise. Baja Fairy Duster, Orchid Rockrose, and others. Shrubs will generally be installed at a 5-gallon minimum. Inorganic Ground Covers include decomposed granite, crushed rock, and boulders. These will range in size and coarseness and will be arranged in a decorative manner as shown on Sheet L1.1 for the Entry and Open Space Plan. Entry Gates and Monument Sign Detailed preliminary exhibits for the entry gate and entry monument have been provided on sheet L1.1. The entryway paving will be enhanced with interlocking pavers with acid wash concrete bands. The gate itself will be constructed from tubular steel. The monument will provide a 6’-0” tall wall to provide a 30 square-foot area for wall signage. The wall will be constructed from tan split face con crete masonry unit (CMU) with a precision cap and will feature a stone pilaster with a pre-cast cap. The sign copy will feature the community name which will be proposed at a later time; it is expected that the sign copy will be backlit. Fence and Wall Plan A preliminary fence and wall plan is provided on Sheets L3.1 and L3.2 of the landscape plan showing the design detail and locations of walls throughout the community. Generally, walls will be constructed from precision cut or split face CMU with a cap at a height of 6’-0” to 6’-6” or as combination walls consisting of 2’-0” of CMU with 4’-0” tubular steel atop. Decorative pilasters will be provided as endcaps or to break up long wall segments adjoining streets or open space area. The applicant is conditioned to submit a final wall plan to ensure compliance with the ARC conditions imposed on the design review approval. Circulation Primary vehicular access to the project site will be provided by Shadow Ridge Road which extends from Monterey Avenue to the west, through the project site and connecting to Gerald Ford Drive at the north end. The segment of Shadow Ridge Road which bifurcates the site is currently improved as a 20’ wide private drive, paved with asphalt and unimproved shoulders, and is currently used to provide secondary emergency access, and a connection to the Marriott’s golf course maintenance yard at the north end of the site. The proposed project will remove the segment of Shadow Ridge Road within the project site and dedicate and construct private streets ranging in width from 33’ feet wide (curb to curb) and 41’ feet wide (curb to curb) on Lots “A” through “D”. These streets will incorporate easements for Utility and Emergency Access Purposes. A cross section for a portion of Street “A” and “B” is provided below in Figure 3. 72 City of Palm Desert – Planning Commission Case Nos. VTTM 38866 / PP23-0023 – Toll Brothers Shadow Ridge Page 9 of 14 Figure 4 – Private Street Section Two “motor courts” are planned Lots “E” and “F” to provide vehicle access to Lots 22-23, and 29-31. Primary access to the site will be taken through western access point leading to Monterey Avenue. A new gate and vehicle turnaround will be constructed at this location. The northern access point on Gerald Ford will be for emergency access; this existing access point is currently gated, and no modifications are proposed. The Riverside County Fire Marshal’s Office has reviewed the project and approved the proposed access and gate designs. Internal roadways within the project site are proposed without sidewalks due to the inclusion of the privacy gates separating the project from adjoining properties and reduced traffic counts on the private roadway which will have lower traffic due to the trip generation of the project being below 100 trips during peak hour. A pedestrian access gate will be provided at the new entry gate. To facilitate pedestrian access, the proposed project will construct a new sidewalk along the northern side of Shadow Ridge Drive to provide a complete pedestrian connection to Monterey Avenue and the Shadow Ridge existing clubhouse building Community Facilities District (CFD) The applicant plans to form a Community Facilities District (CFD) for the tract area to fund public safety services for the planned community. A condition of approval has been applied to the vesting tentative tract map requiring the applicant to initiate the formation of a community facilities district for services pursuant to the Mello-Roos Act by submitting a petition in the form specified by the City, and Developer shall complete the formation process prior to or concurrent with the approval of the final map. 73 City of Palm Desert – Planning Commission Case Nos. VTTM 38866 / PP23-0023 – Toll Brothers Shadow Ridge Page 10 of 14 ANALYSIS: Development Standards The zoning designation of the project site is Planned Residential (PR) which allows the development of single-family residential as a permitted use with the approval of a Precise Plan by the Palm Desert Planning Commission and Tentative Tract Map in accordance with Palm Desert Municipal Code Section (PDMC) 25.72.030. Development in the PR zoning district is subject to development standards provided under PDMC 25.10.50. It is the purpose and general intent of the PR district to provide for flexibility in development, creative and imaginative design, and the development of parcels of land as coordinated projects involving a mixture of residential densities and housing types, and community facilities. Developments of residential tracts may propose site specific development standards, provided they adhere to minimum criteria identified in the zoning ordinance. The exceptions will be considered by the PC. For the purposes of calculating density for the project, the zoning ordinance requires density be calculated based on Gross Density. Gross Density is the total number of dwelling units permitted on an acre of land exclusive of all existing public streets and right-of-way but including all streets or right-of-way to be developed. The project will develop 93 units on 20.69-acres of land area. Planned Residential Standards PDMC Section 25.10.050(B) establishes general standards for the Planned Residential District regarding density, open space, site specific standards, and open space standards. Below is a general overview of requirements and project compliance with applicable standards:  PDMC 25.10.050(B)(2) Filing Procedure – To initiate the review process, the applicant shall file applications for a change of zone (if needed) to a PR district along with a precise plan, tentative tract/parcel map and supporting environmental documentation. A change of zone is not required as the project is consistent with the existing zoning designation (PR-5) of the site. The applicant has filed applications for a precise plan, vesting tentative tract map, and an Initial Study supporting that the project be found exempt pursuant to CEQA.  PDMC 25.10.050(B)(3) Density – The density of the proposed development is 4.49 dwelling units per acre based on gross density. This is b elow the maximum allowable of 5 dwellings per acre for PR-5 zoning designation and within the allowable density range of up to 10 dwellings per acre for the Resort & Entertainment District Land Use Designation.  PDMC 25.10.050(B)(4) – This section does not apply to the proposed project as the proposed project will not include any affordable housing.  PDMC 25.10.050(B)(5) Development Standards Applicable o Off-street parking – Each unit will provide a minimum of two covered parking spaces within an enclosed garage with a minimum internal dimension of 20’ wide by 20’ deep. This complies with the minimum requirements of two parking spaces for a single-family residential dwelling established by Section 25.46.030(D)(10). Additional parking will be provided as open spaces within driveways and on-street parking within the private community. The standard is met. 74 City of Palm Desert – Planning Commission Case Nos. VTTM 38866 / PP23-0023 – Toll Brothers Shadow Ridge Page 11 of 14 o Utilities – In accordance with the requirements of 25.40.120, there are no existing overhead electrical utilities on the property. Future utility installations will be conditioned to be underground. There may be temporary overhead utility service lines and structures associated with construction, however these would be removed prior to units obtaining a final certificate of occupancy. The standard is met. o Signs – Monument signage is proposed at the project entry. The preliminary location and project design comply with the requirements of PDMC Chapter 25.56 as the monument sign is less than the maximum allowable height of 6’-0” from grade and provides area for future community identification below the maximum allowed area of 40 square-feet as allowed by Table 25.56-1 in PDMC 25.56.070. The standard is met. o Outside Storage – No outside storage is proposed. There is no dedicated lot to provide on-site storage for personal items of residents. The standard does not apply. o Screening – The private yards of the development will be enclosed by solid CMU walls ranging from 6’-0” to 6’-6” feet in height. These walls will provide adequate screening for private items and outdoor storage for future residents. Ground mounted HVAC condensers will be located in side yards and will be screened from view of internal private streets and neighboring properties. The standard is met.  PDMC 25.10.050(B)(6) - Special Standards o Minimum Project Area- The project density is less than 7 dwelling-units-per-acre and has a minimum area greater than 5-acres. The standard is met. o Minimum Project Width – The project density is less than 7 dwelling-units-per-acre and has a minimum width greater than 200 feet. The standard is met. o Minimum Project Perimeter Setback – The project does not adjoin any existing or proposed public streets. The standard does not apply. o Minimum Project Building Coverage – The project density is less than 7 dwelling units per acre and has a maximum coverage of 40%. The maximum building coverage allowed by the development standards is 356,780-square feet of building area which is located on the 93 proposed single-family lots comprising 15.75-acres of the 20.69-acre site. The development standards for the PR district allow a maximum lot coverage of 50%. The proposed development standards will establish a coverage allowance of up to 52% on privately owned residential lots. Though this coverage exceeds the maximum allowable on a per lo t basis, an exception may be granted pursuant to footnote 5 of Table 25.10-3 of PDMC Section 25.10.050 as it provides for an appropriate design for the community and development will be more clustered onto the residential lots. This exception will not result in non-compliance with the 40% maximum project coverage limitation. The standard is met. The exception may be granted. o Minimum Lot Area – The project proposes single-family detached structures. There is no minimum lot standard specified by the ordinance . The project proposed 5,500 square-foot minimum lots and complies with the allowable density range. The standard is met. 75 City of Palm Desert – Planning Commission Case Nos. VTTM 38866 / PP23-0023 – Toll Brothers Shadow Ridge Page 12 of 14 o Minimum Yards – The precise plan and tract map will establish the development standards identified on the project exhibits and summarized in Table 3 of this staff report. The standard is met.  PDMC 25.10.050(B)(7) – Minimum Common Open Space – The project will have internal side yard setbacks of 5’ from the property line and proposes single -story units. The setbacks will provide a minimum 10’ separation between buildings which exceeds the 7’ minimum standard required by the code. The standard is met.  PDMC 25.10.050(B)(8) – Minimum Common Open Space – The project density is less than 7 dwelling units per acre and is required to provide a minimum of 30% of the gross project area as common open space. The project provides 7% open space in the form of landscape area with passive open space amenity. The project does not comply with the minimum open space requirement; however, the development standard may be modified through the precise plan process pursuant to PDMC 25.10.050(B)(15). The proposed project is located in an infill site directly adjacent to an existing timeshare development with access to the timeshare clubhouse and 18 -hole golf course. The development is intended to be a resort-oriented community which will provide future residents access to these amenities through their future association dues. The reduction of onsite open space is justified by providing access to existing open space amenities within the timeshare development which is highly amenities and exceeds the open space area requirement. The standard is met.  PDMC 25.10.050(B)(9) – Building Height – The project will develop single-story buildings at a maximum height of 15’-1” and will not exceed the 40’-0” height limit. The standard is met.  PDMC 25.10.050(B)(11) – Required Width of Private Roads – The private streets within the development will provide on-street parking and road widths ranging from 33’-0” wide with parking on one side of the street, and 41’-0” where parking is provided on both sides. The standard is met. Gated Private Streets The project will provide a new private community gate on Shadow Ridge Road to restrict access into the development to residents only. The 2040 Palm Desert General Plan establishes Land Use Element Policy 3.17 “which strongly discourages the construction of new gated communities except in the Rural or Resort General Plan Designation ”. The project site is designated Resort and Entertainment District by the General Plan Land Use Element and therefore development of a new gated community within this district is consistent with the general plan policy and allowable. Development Agreement 98-1 Pursuant to Development Agreement 98 -1, currently only time shares may be constructed on the site pursuant to Ordinance 888 and Ordinance 1320 which approved the first ame ndment. The second amendment of DA 98-1, approved by City Council Resolution No. 24 -0003 allows for the termination of the development agreement on the 20.69 -acre project site subject to conditions of Subsection 6.6 of Section 6 (Termination). To ensure th at the conditions are met, the resolution for the Vesting Tentative Tract Map requires the applicant to submit written proof of compliance with the conditions of Subsection 6.6 prior to approval of the final map. The conditions are: 76 City of Palm Desert – Planning Commission Case Nos. VTTM 38866 / PP23-0023 – Toll Brothers Shadow Ridge Page 13 of 14 a) That Marriot provide a copy of the grant deed showing that the property has been conveyed to Toll Bros, Inc., or a single purpose development entity controlled by Toll Bros, Inc. b) Payment of $1.6 million dollars from the proceeds of the land sale, which will be in lieu of the Weekly Facilities Fee which was to be paid to the City by Marriott for the Shadow Ridge Development. c) That Marriott obtain approval of a modification of the Precise Plan/Conditional Use Permit releasing the Subject Property from the requirements of Resoluti on No. 98- 108. Planning Commission adoption of Resolution No. 2872 will satisfy condition c). The map final map approval shall be contingent on termination of the Development Agreement on the project site and completion of condition a) and b) of Subsection 6.6. The sale of the property by Marriott to Toll Brothers is contingent upon project approval. Public Input: Public Notification Public noticing was conducted for the June 18, 2024, Planning Commission meeting, per the requirements of PDMC Section 25.60.060 and Government Code Sections 65090 to 65094. A public hearing notice was published on Friday, June 7, 2024, in The Desert Sun newspaper. Notices were mailed to all property owners and occupants within 1,000 feet of the Project Site. No comments by the public were received as of June 11, 2024. On June 5, 2024, between the hours of 6 PM and 7 PM the Applicant held an in -person open house meeting at the Lakeview Room located at the Marriott Shadow Ridge resort, consistent with the City’s Community Engagement requirements. Despite advanced notice and open invitation, no residents attended the meeting. This can be attributed to the separation of the project from existing uses; within 1,000 feet of the project the owners of approximately 23 single - family homeowners were notified in the Dolce Community on Gerald Ford Drive, the Gallery on Gerald Ford Drive, and two homes located on Woodward Drive. Environment Assessment/Environmental Review: City staff has reviewed the Project in accordance with the Cal ifornia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the Project may be found exempt from further environmental review pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 as the project is consistent with the Palm Desert General Plan. An Initial Study (document) was prepared for the project which examined the potential environmental impacts of the project. This document evaluated all CEQA issues contained in the latest Initial Study Checklist form. This document analyzes the proposed project with respect to its compliance with the CEQA, particularly CEQA Guidelines Section 15183, and in the context of consistency with the City of Palm Desert General Plan and its certified Environmental Impact Report (EIR). CEQA Requirements (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et. seq.) and the State CEQA Guidelines require that state and local government agencies evaluate and consider the potential environmental effects of projects over which they have discretionary authority. CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 allows for a streamlined environmental review process for projects, which are 77 City of Palm Desert – Planning Commission Case Nos. VTTM 38866 / PP23-0023 – Toll Brothers Shadow Ridge Page 14 of 14 consistent with the development density established by existing zoning, community plan, or general plan policies for which an EIR was certified, except as might be necessary to examine whether there are project-specific significant effects, which are peculiar to the project or its sites. If the above qualifications are met, as stated in Section 15183(b), “a public agency shall limit its examination of environmental effects to those which the agency determines, in an initial study or other analysis: (1) are peculiar to the project or the parcel on which the project would be located, (2) were not analyzed as significant effects in a prior EIR on the zoning action, general plan, or community plan, with which the project is consistent, (3) are potentially significant off-site impacts and cumulative impacts which were not discussed in the prior EIR prepared for the general plan, community plan or zoning action, or the Project’s CEQA Section 15183 Analysis (4) are previously identified significant effects which, as a result of substantial new information which was not known at the time the EIR was certified, are determined to have a more severe adverse impact than discussed in the prior EIR.” This document has been prepared to satisfy the requirements of CEQA Guidelines Section 15183. It analyzes the potential environmental effects of the proposed project and evaluates whether they were adequately analyzed in a prior EIR such that the above-identified streamlining criteria apply. The project is consistent with the Palm Desert General Plan Update (General Plan Update), for which an EIR (SCH # 2015081020) was certified. The General Plan Update provides a framework for future growth of the City and projects the development reasonably expected to occur during the buildout period. The General Plan Update EIR analyzed the environmental impacts associated with the adoption and implementation of the General Plan Update. The proposed project is permitted in the zoning district where the project site is located and consistent with the land uses, density, and vision of the General Plan Update. The evaluation determined that either no impact or less than significant impacts would be associated with t he project. Findings of Approval: Findings can be made in support of the project under the PDMC. Findings in support of this project are contained in the draft Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 2873 and 2874, attached to this staff report. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Draft Planning Commission Resolution No. 2873 (VTTM) 2. Draft Planning Commission Resolution No. 2874 (PP) 3. Public Hearing Notice 4. Architectural Review Commission Notice of Action for May 14, 2024 5. Project Exhibits a. Vesting Tentative Tract Map 38866 b. Preliminary Grading Plan dated April 19, 2024 c. Preliminary Architectural Exhibits dated April 16, 2024 d. Preliminary Landscaping dated June 10, 2024 6. Notice of Exemption 7. CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 Analysis dated June 2024 78 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2873 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 38866 TO SUBDIVIDE APPROXIMATELY 20.69-ACRES INTO 93 NUMBERED LOTS, AND 13 LETTERED LOTS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY WITH PRIVATE OPEN SPACE, LANDSCAPE AND VEHICULAR ACCESS LOCATED ON SHADOW RIDGE ROAD GENERALLY SOUTH OF GERALD FORD DRIVE AND EAST OF MONTEREY AVENUE AND FINDING THE PROJECT IS EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA). CASE NOS. VTTM 38866 (TTM23-0005) WHEREAS, on December 20, 2023, the applicant, Toll Brothers, filed a formal application with the City of Palm Desert for the approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 38866 (TTM23-0005) to subdivide approximately 20.69 gross acres into 93 single-family residential lots with a minimum lot size of 5,500-square-feet, and lots for private streets, landscape and open space areas, and other related dedications (“Project”) located on the Designated Remainder Parcel 4 and Designated Remainder Parcel 5, and Lot “D” of Tract 28818-1 on Riverside County Assessor Parcel Number(s) 694-290-010, -011, 694-320-010, and -011 (“Project Site”); and WHEREAS, the applicant filed Vesting Tentative Tract Map (“VTTM”) 38866 concurrently with an application for a Precise Plan (PP23-0023) for the proposed site improvements on the Project Site and development standards for the VTTM; and WHEREAS, VTTM 38866 has a General Plan land use designation of Resort and Entertainment Center, and a Zoning Designation of Planned Residential – 5 Dwelling Units per Acre (PR-5); and WHEREAS, the Project Site is subject to the requirements of Development Agreement 98-1 as amended by Palm Desert City Council Resolution No. 24-003; and WHEREAS, the subject VTTM 38866 conforms with the City of Palm Desert 2040 General Plan, Subdivision Ordinance, and Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, under Section 21067 of the Public Resources Code, Section 15367 of the State California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) Guidelines (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 14, § 15000 et seq.), and the City of Palm Desert’s (“City’s”) Local CEQA Guidelines, the City is the lead agency for the Project; and WHEREAS, in accordance with State CEQA Guidelines Section 15063, the City prepared an Initial Study to determine if the Project may have a significant effect on the environment and to evaluate whether an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was required; and WHEREAS, State CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 (Public Resources Code §21083.3), provides that projects which are consistent with a Community Plan, General Plan, or Zoning for which an environmental impact report (EIR) has been certified “shall not require 79 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2873 additional environmental review, except as might be necessary to examine whether there are project specific significant effects which are peculiar to the project or its site;” and WHEREAS, an Environmental Impact Report (SCH # 2015081020) was certified by the City of Palm Desert City Council for the 2040 Palm Desert General Plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the June 18, 2024, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider the request by the Applicant for approval of VTTM 38866; and WHEREAS, at the said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, the Planning Commission did find the following facts and reasons, which are outlined in the staff report exist to justify approval of said request; and WHEREAS, all other legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: SECTION 1. Recitals. The Planning Commission hereby finds that the foregoing recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein as substantive findings of this Resolution. SECTION 2. Findings on Tentative Tract Map. Under PDMC Section 26.20.100(C), the findings for the tentative map are the following: 1. That the density of the proposed subdivision is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. The map has been found to be consistent with the density, lot development standards, and land uses of the General Plan Land Use Designation for the Resort and Entertainment District which permits residential densities of up to 10 dwelling units per acre. The proposed Vesting Tentative Tract Map proposes to develop 93 residential lots on approximately 20.69-acres for a residential density of approximately 4.49 dwelling units per acre which is below the maximum density envisioned by the General Plan Land Use Element and allowable unit count of up to 207 dwelling units on the site. 2. That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. The design and improvement of the subdivision is consistent with the applicable general plan requirements for lot standards, the circulation, and distribution of land uses. The onsite improvements will be completed according to City standards and the specific requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance. The project site provides adequate vehicular and pedestrian circulation to surrounding land uses. 80 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2873 3. That the site is physically suitable for the type of development. The site is physically suitable for the type of residential development as the proposed intensities are consistent with the uses analyzed by the General Plan Environmental Impact Report, envisioned for the Resort and Entertainment District, and allowed by the Planned Residential zoning designation. The site has suitable access, grading, drainage, and zoning to allow the development. Drainage has been analyzed in accordance with City development standards and code requirements. 4. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development. The site is physically suitable for the density of residential development as the proposed intensities are consistent with the densities analyzed by the General Plan Environmental Impact Report, envisioned for the Resort and Entertainment District, and allowed by the Planned Residential zoning designation. The site has suitable access, grading, drainage, and zoning to allow the development. The project is proposing 93 residential dwellings, which is below the 103 residential dwellings allowed by the Zoning Designation on the site, and below the 207 residential dwellings allowed by the General Plan Land Use Designation on the site. 5. That the design of the subdivision or the improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and unavoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. The design of the subdivision and improvements will not cause damage or substantially injure wildlife habitat. The subject property is in an urbanized area of Palm Desert which has been disturbed and is adjacent to major roadways, including Gerald Ford Drive and Monterey Avenue. The site is vacant and surrounded by golf course and timeshare developments. A biological assessment of the site was prepared for the project and did not identify suitable habitats for wildlife that could be damaged or affected as a result of the development of the Project. Ground-disturbing activities for the development of the Project shall comply with the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, as well as preparation of a burrowing owl survey prior to ground-disturbing activities and prior to the removal of vegetation or tree removal shall ensure no habitat is damaged in accordance with Mitigation Measure MM 4.5-1 of the General Plan EIR and recommendations of the Biological Assessment prepared for the project. 6. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause serious health problems. The Project is not located within a hazardous area that would be subject to flooding, liquefaction, landslides, fault zones, or other natural hazards. The Project does not generate adverse effects that would cause public health problems. Ground - disturbing activities are conditioned to prepare plans to control fugitive dust. The access locations to the subdivision have been evaluated in accordance with the 81 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2873 Specific Plan and will not adversely affect public health. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause public health problems. Future building and infrastructure shall be constructed in compliance with applicable Zoning, Building, and Fire codes. SECTION 3. CEQA. The application has complied with the requirements of the “City of Palm Desert Procedure for Implementation of CEQA” Resolution No. 2019-41, in that the Planning Commission finds that the Project is consistent with the approved General Plan and Zoning Ordinance and that other project-specific impacts were evaluated in the Initial Study (15183 Analysis) prepared for the project and that no further environmental review is required under State CEQA Guidelines 15183. CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 allows for a streamlined environmental review process for projects, which are consistent with the development density established by existing zoning, community plan, or General Plan policies for which an EIR was certified, except as might be necessary to examine whether there are project-specific significant effects which are peculiar to the Project or its sites. If the above qualifications are met, as stated in Section 15183(b), “a public agency shall limit its examination of environmental effects to those which the agency determines, in an initial study or other analysis: (1) are peculiar to the Project or the parcel on which the Project would be located, (2) were not analyzed as significant effects in a prior EIR on the zoning action, General Plan or community plan, with which the Project is consistent, (3) are potentially significant off-site impacts, and cumulative impacts which were not discussed in the prior EIR prepared for the General Plan, community plan or zoning action, or the Project’s CEQA Section 15183 Analysis (4) are previously identified significant effects which, as a result of substantial new information, which was not known at the time the EIR was certified, are determined to have a more severe adverse impact than discussed in the prior EIR.” An Initial Study has been prepared to document the findings to satisfy the requirements of CEQA Guidelines Section 15183. It analyzes the potential environmental effects of the proposed Project and evaluates whether they were adequately analyzed in a prior EIR such that the above-identified streamlining criteria apply. The Project is consistent with the Palm Desert General Plan Update (General Plan Update), for which an EIR (SCH No. 2015081020) was certified. The General Plan Update provides a framework for future growth of the City and projects the development reasonably expected to occur during the buildout period. The General Plan Update EIR analyzed the environmental impacts associated with the adoption and implementation of the General Plan Update. The proposed Project is permitted in the zoning district where the Project site is located and consistent with the land uses, density, and vision of the 2040 Palm Desert General Plan; and SECTION 4. Custodian of Records. The documents and materials that constitute the record of proceedings on which these findings are based are located at the City’s office at 73510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, CA 92260. Richard D. Cannone, AICP, the Secretary to the Palm Desert Planning Commission, is the custodian of the record of proceedings. SECTION 5. Project Approval. The Planning Commission approves Vesting Tentative Tract Map 38866, subject to the Conditions of Approval attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and subject to the pad elevation matrix attached hereto as Exhibit “B”. 82 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2873 SECTION 6. Execution of Resolution. The Chairperson of the Planning Commission signs this Resolution, and the Secretary to the Commission shall attest and certify to the passage and adoption thereof. ADOPTED ON June 18, 2024 JOSEPH PRADETTO CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: RICHARD D. CANNONE, AICP SECRETARY I, Richard D. Cannone, AICP, Secretary of the City of Palm Desert Planning Commission, hereby certify that Resolution No. 2873 is a full, true, and correct copy, and was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert on June 18, 2024, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSED: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Palm Desert, California, on June 18, 2024. RICHARD D. CANNONE, AICP SECRETARY 83 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2873 EXHIBIT A CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO. VTTM 38866 (TTM23-0005) PLANNING DIVISION: 1. The development of the property shall conform substantially with exhibits on file with the Development Services Department, as modified by the following conditions. 2. The Applicant agrees that in the event of any administrative, legal, or equitable action instituted by a third party challenging the validity of any of the procedures leading to the adoption of these project approvals for the Project, or the project approvals themselves, the Developer and City each shall have the right, in their sole discretion, to elect whether or not to defend such action. Developer, at its sole expense, shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City (including its agents, officers, and employees) from any such action, claim, or proceeding with counse l chosen by the City, subject to the Developer’s approval of counsel, which shall not be unreasonably denied, and at the Developer’s sole expense. If the City is aware of such an action or proceeding, it shall promptly notify the Developer and cooperate in the defense. The Developer, upon such notification, shall deposit with City sufficient funds in the judgment of the City Finance Director to cover the expense of defending such action without any offset or claim against said deposit to assure that the City expends no City funds. If both Parties elect to defend, the Parties hereby agree to affirmatively cooperate in defending said action and to execute a joint defense and confidentiality agreement in order to share and protect the information under the joint defense privilege recognized under applicable law. As part of the cooperation in defending an action, City and Developer shall coordinate their defense in order to make the most efficient use of legal counsel and to share and protect information. Dev eloper and City shall each have sole discretion to terminate its defense at any time. The City shall not settle any third-party litigation of project approvals without the Developer’s consent, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned, or delayed unless the Developer materially breaches this indemnification requirement. 3. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein, which are in addition to the approved development standards listed in the PDMC, and state and federal statutes now in force. 4. The Vesting Tentative Tract Map shall expire if the map is not recorded within twenty- four (24) months from the effective date of approval, unless an extension of time is granted by the Palm Desert Planning Commission otherwise, said approval shall become null, void, and of no effect whatsoever. 5. The Applicant shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this Vesting Tentative Tract Map. 84 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2873 6. This land division shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act and all requirements of Title 26 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code, unless modified by the conditions listed herein. 7. Prior to map approval, the Applicant shall demonstrate compliance with all conditions of the Second Amendment of Development Agreement 98-1 under Section 6 (Termination) Subsection 6.6 and that the Development Agreement has been terminated on the subject site. The final map shall not be approved until the Development Agreement has been terminated on the subject site. 8. The Applicant shall execute a written acknowledgment to the Planning Division stating acceptance of and compliance with all the Conditions of Approval of Resolution No. 2873 for VTTM 38866, and that the plans submitted are in compliance with the Conditions of Approval. No modifications shall be made to said plans without written approval from the appropriate decision-making body. 9. Prior to map approval, the Applicant shall prepare an exhibit that shows all open space lots within the tract and the entity responsible for the maintenance of each lot. The exhibit shall be reviewed and approved by the Development Services Department. 10. Prior to map approval, the Applicant shall submit a list of proposed street names for the tract. The list shall include a primary preferred name, and two alternate names for each respective street within the tract. 11. Prior to map approval, the Applicant shall establish a homeowners’ association (HOA). The HOA’s responsibility for maintenance shall include but is not limited to maintenance of private amenity areas and open space, landscaping, stormwater retention, and related infrastructure. The final maintenance plan shall include detailed text and illustrative diagrams indicating areas of responsibility for maintenance and shall be subject to approval by the Director of Development Services and City Engineer. 12. All construction documentation shall be coordinated for consistency, including, but not limited to, architectural, structural, mechanical, electrical, plumbing, landscape and irrigation, grading, and street improvement plans. All such plans shall be consistent with the approved entitlement plans on file with the Development Services Department. 13. The Applicant shall be subject to payment of all applicable City fees in effect as of the effective date of this approval. 14. The lot and development standards of VTTM 38866 shall be as follows in the table below: Development Standard Requirement Lot Standards 85 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2873 Minimum Lot Area (Square-Feet) 5,500 SF Minimum Lot Width (Feet) 50’-0” Minimum Lot Depth (Feet) 110’-0” Building Standards Minimum Front Yard – Living Area (Feet) 10’-0” Minimum Front Yard – Garage (Feet) 18’-0” Minimum Side Yard - Interior and Street (Feet) 5’-0” Minimum Rear Yard (Feet) 10’-0” Maximum Building Height (Feet) 18’-0” Maximum Lot Coverage (Percentage) 52% 15. To avoid impacting nesting birds, one of the following must be implemented by the project: Conduct grading and/or ground disturbing activities from September 16 th through January 31st when birds are not likely to be nesting on the site; OR Prior to any ground disturbing activities occurring between February 1st and September 15th, in accordance with the Biological Resource Assessment prepared by Jennings Environmental Dated December 2023 and the recommendations made therein, a qualified Avian Biologist will conduct pre‐construction Nesting Bird Surveys (NBS) no more than 3-days prior to Project‐related disturbance to nestable vegetation to identify any active nests. If no active nests are found, no further action will be required. If an active nest is found, the biologist will set a ppropriate no‐work buffers around the nest which will be based upon the nesting species, its sensitivity to disturbance, nesting stage, and expected types, intensity, and duration of the disturbance. The nests and buffer zones shall be field checked weekl y by a qualified biological monitor. The approved no‐work buffer zone shall be clearly marked in the field, within which no disturbance activity shall commence until the qualified biologist has determined the young birds have successfully fledged and the n est is inactive. Prior to grading permit issuance, the applicant shall submit a fully executed copy of the contract with a qualified Avian Biologist to the Development Services Department. 16. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall pay all applicable Local Development Mitigation Fees required of the development in accordance with the Coachella Valley Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan (CVMSHCP). 17. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the project applicant shall retain a qualified archaeologist and shall submit a fully executed copy of the contract with said qualified archaeologist to the Development Services Department. In the event that potentially significant archaeological materials are encountered during construction and/or any ground-disturbing activities, all work shall be halted in the vicinity of the discovery until the qualified archaeologist can assess the significance and integrity of the find. In the event of any discoveries the Department of Development Services shall be immediately notified. If intact and significant archaeological remains are encountered, the impacts of the project should be mitigated appropriately. 86 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2873 18. The final building pad elevations shall conform to the approved pad elevations for each lot shown in Exhibit B of this Resolution. Deviation from these approved pad elevations may be permitted in accordance with Palm Desert Municipal Code Section 27.12.045 pursuant to Ordinance 1382. 19. The Applicant shall prepare and submitted a written report to the Director of Development Services demonstrating compliance with these conditions of approval, and any mitigation measures required by the Palm Desert General Plan Environmental Impact Report (SCH # 2015081020) as documented in the initial study prepared in support of the CEQA Guidelines 15183 Findings. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 20. In order to maintain certain services provided by the City of Palm Desert, which are impacted by the proposed development, including, but not limited to, police services, fire and ambulance and emergency response services, parks and open space maintenance, lighting and landscape maintenance, administrative fees of the City and any other services permitted under the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended, commencing with Section 53311 of the Government Code (“Act”) as well as costs of administration, operating, and reporting, the Developer shall initiate the formation of a community facilities district for services pursuant to the Act by submitting a petition in the form specified by the City, and Developer shall complete the formation process prior to or concurrent with the approval of the final map. ENGINEERING DIVISION: 21. The following plans, studies, and exhibits are hereby referenced: Shadow Ridge - Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 38866, prepared by Wilson Mikami Corporation and dated April 19, 2024. 22. It is assumed that easements shown on the vesting tentative tract map exhibit are shown correctly and include all the easements that encumber the subject property. A current preliminary title report for the site will be required to be submitted during technical plan review. The applicant shall secure approval from all, if any, easement holders for all grading and improvements, which are proposed over the respective easement or provide evidence that the easement has been relocated, quitclaimed, vacated, abandoned, easement holder cannot be found, or is otherwise of no effect. Should such approvals or alternate actions regarding the easements not be provided and approved by the City, the applicant may be required to amend or revise the proposed site configuration as may be necessary. 23. If the developer chooses to construct the project in phases, a Construction Phasing Plan for the construction of improvements shall be submitted for review and approved by the City Engineer and Director of Development Services Director. Approval of any 87 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2873 request for phasing may be sent to the Planning Commission for consideration as an amendment to this Resolution. 24. All utility extensions within the site shall be placed underground unless otherwise specified or allowed by the respective utility purveyor. 25. Prior to any work within the public right-of-way, the applicant shall obtain an encroachment permit from the City’s Public Works Department. 26. Prior to expiration of the Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 38866, or as extended if applicable, the subdivider shall cause the real property included within the tentative map exhibit, or any part thereof, to be surveyed; and Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 38866 thereof shall be prepared based upon these conditions of approval, and in accordance with the provisions of the Development Agreement, City of Palm Desert Municipal Code Title 26, and the Subdivision Map Act CA Code Section 66410 (et al). 27. The Final Map shall include appropriate easements for streets, public utilities, and emergency access which shall be dedicated on the Final Map. It is understood that the Vesting Tentative Tract Map exhibit correctly shows acceptable centerline elevations, all existing easements, necessary travelled ways, and drainage courses, and that the omission or unacceptability may require that the subdivider amend, revise, or reprocess the tentative map as may be necessary to allow a finding on the final map of substantial conformance by the Director of Development Services or City Engineer. Existing travelled ways and drainage courses shall be perpetuated with the Final Map which shall depict all easements required, and/or identify any existing easement(s) dedicated by separate instrument. 28. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&R's) shall be submitted for review and approved by the City Engineer and City Attorney. The CC&R's shall include, but not be limited to, access easements, reciprocal access, private and/or public utility easements as may be relevant to the project. A. Lot I and L, as shown on the vesting tentative tract map exhibit, shall be for water quality purposes. Appropriate language shall be included in the CC&Rs to identify the mechanism that will be used for the perpetual maintenance of the underground retention system. 29. Prior to final map recordation, the subdivider is responsible for the submittal of improvement plans for all offsite and onsite improvements for review and approval by the City Engineer. In compliance with the Subdivision Map Act, if said improvements are not constructed prior to final map recordation, the subdivider shall guarantee the completion of all improvements required to support the development, within the boundaries of the final map, by executing a Subdivision Improvement Agreement with the City and posting the required security. 30. Prior to final map approval plan, the subdivider shall provide a copy of approved water and sewer plans, by Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD), to the City. Subdivider 88 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2873 shall provide bonding for the improvements as identified in the City’s Municipal Code Chapter 27. 31. Prior to final map approval, in compliance with the Subdivision Map Act, the subdivider shall provide the surveyor’s certification for placement of monuments or provide monument bond in the amount and form compliant with the City’s Municipal Code Chapter 27 and as approved by the City Engineer. 32. Prior to final map recordation, an emergency vehicle access road(s) shall be constructed per Fire Department’s requirements or bonded for as part of the required improvements for the subdivision. 33. Prior to improvement plan approval, the Developer shall guarantee the construction of the following improvements by entering into a public improvement agreement and posting security. The improvements shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to occupancy of the first building: A. Shadow Ridge Road (private) shall be improved to provide an ADA-compliant sidewalk from the project’s southerly/main entrance to the Marriott’s Shadow Ridge Golf Club. Existing accessibility route and curb ramps that are being connected to shall be in conformance with current ADA regulations. B. Street “A” between Shadow Ridge Road (private) and Street “B” (private) shall be a 59-ft-wide private street and shall be improved to provide a 50-ft paved section and a 10-ft raised median with one side of the median being a minimum of 24’ wide curb to curb). Improvements may include, but not limited to, pavement, base, curb and/or gutter, 4-ft sidewalk on the north side, curb ramps, signing, striping, landscaping and irrigation. C. Street “A” between Street “B” (private) and Street “C” (private), Street “B”, and Street “C” shall be 33-ft-wide private streets and shall be improved to provide a 32-ft paved section. Improvements may include, but not limited to, pavement, base, curb and/or gutter, signing, striping. Public Utility Easement (PUE) to be as directed by the Utility Purveyors. 34. Prior to release of related improvement bonds, the applicant shall provide as-built plans for all relevant public facilities, centerline ties and all required monumentation pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act, and certified final plans for all private street improvements. FIRE DEPARTMENT: 35. Prior to Map Recordation - ECS Note-Fire Water Protection: Hydrants, Tanks, or Will Serve Letter ECS map must be stamped by the Riverside County Surveyor with the following note: "Required fire water protection system- fire hydrants and/or water tank, shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate agency prior to any combustible building materials placed on an individual lot. Written certification/will serve letter from the appropriate water company can be provided to indicate that the proper and acceptable fire hydrant system is within the project area." 89 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2873 36. Prior to Map Recordation ECS Note-Water Systems ECS map must be stamped by the Riverside County Surveyor with the following note: "The required public water system improvements, including fire hydrants, shall be installed, and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building material placed on an individual lot." 37. Prior to Map Recordation, ECS Note-Water System Deferred (Alternate) ECS map must be stamped by the Riverside County Surveyor with the following note: "Should the applicant or developer choose to defer the fire protection requirements, an Environmental Constraint Sheet shall be filed with the final map containing the following: Prior to building permit issuance: the applicant or developer shall provide written certification from the appropriate water company that the required fire hydrants are either existing or that financial arrangements have been made to provide them." END OF CONDITIONS 90 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2873 EXHIBIT B APPROVED PAD ELEVATIONS CASE NO. VTTM 38866 (TTM23-0005) Vesting Tentative Tract Map Lot Number Approved Vesting Tentative Tract Map Pad Elevations (NAVD88 EPOCH 1991.5, AUG 1995) 1 305.4 2 305.5 3 305.8 4 306.1 5 306.3 6 306.8 7 306.5 8 306.2 9 306.0 10 305.7 11 305.5 12 305.2 13 305.0 14 305.1 15 305.3 16 305.6 17 305.8 18 306.1 19 306.4 20 306.6 21 306.8 22 307.4 23 307.7 24 307.1 25 307.3 26 307.5 27 307.2 28 306.7 29 307.1 30 307.4 31 307.9 32 306.4 91 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2873 33 306.2 34 306.0 35 305.8 36 305.4 37 305.3 38 304.9 39 304.9 40 304.6 41 306.0 42 306.2 43 306.6 44 306.8 45 307.1 46 307.5 47 307.7 48 308.1 49 308.3 50 308.7 51 308.9 52 309.3 53 309.5 54 309.9 55 310.1 56 310.5 57 310.7 58 311.1 59 311.3 60 311.0 61 310.4 62 307.1 63 306.8 64 306.5 65 306.8 66 307.5 67 307.8 68 308.3 69 308.9 70 309.2 71 309.7 92 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2873 72 310.3 73 310.6 74 311.1 75 311.3 76 311.1 77 310.8 78 310.4 79 310.2 80 309.8 81 309.6 82 309.2 83 309.0 84 308.7 85 308.3 86 307.7 87 307.4 88 307.0 89 306.8 90 306.5 91 306.1 92 305.8 93 304.6 93 94 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2874 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PRECISE PLAN FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 93 UNIT SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION LOCATED ON SHADOW RIDGE ROAD WITHIN THE EXISTING MARRIOTT SHADOW RIDGE DEVELOPMENT, AND FINDING THAT THE PROJECT IS EXEMPT FROM FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT CASE NOS. PP23-0023 WHEREAS, on December 20, 2023, the applicant, Toll Brothers, filed a formal application with the City of Palm Desert for the approval of Precise Plan of design to develop an approximately 20.69 gross acres into 93 single-family residential homes (“Project”) located on the Designated Remainder Parcel 4 and Designated Remainder Parcel 5, and Lot “D” of Tract 28818-1 on Riverside County Assessor Parcel Number(s) 694-290-010, -011, 694-320- 010, and -011 (“Project Site”); and WHEREAS, the applicant filed PP23-0023 concurrently with a Vesting Tentative Tract Map (“VTTM”) 38866 for the proposed site improvements on the Project; and WHEREAS, the Project Site has a General Plan land use designation of Resort and Entertainment Center, and a Zoning Designation of Planned Residential – 5 Dwelling Units per Acre (PR-5); and WHEREAS, the Project Site is subject to the requirements of Development Agreement 98-1 as amended by Palm Desert City Council Resolution No. 24-003; and WHEREAS, the subject precise plan conforms with the City of Palm Desert 2040 General Plan and Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, under Section 21067 of the Public Resources Code, Section 15367 of the State California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) Guidelines (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 14, § 15000 et seq.), and the City of Palm Desert’s (“City’s”) Local CEQA Guidelines, the City is the lead agency for the Project; and WHEREAS, in accordance with State CEQA Guidelines Section 15063, the City prepared an Initial Study to determine if the Project may have a significant effect on the environment and to evaluate whether an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was required; and WHEREAS, State CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 (Public Resources Code §21083.3), provides that projects which are consistent with a Community Plan, General Plan, or Zoning for which an environmental impact report (EIR) has been certified “shall not require additional environmental review, except as might be necessary to examine whether there are project specific significant effects which are peculiar to the project or its site;” and WHEREAS, an Environmental Impact Report (SCH # 2015081020) was certified by the City of Palm Desert City Council for the 2040 Palm Desert General Plan; and 95 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2874 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the June 18, 2024, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider the request by the Applicant for approval of Precise Plan; and WHEREAS, at the said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, the Planning Commission did find the following facts and reasons, which are outlined in the staff report exist to justify approval of said request; and WHEREAS, all other legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: SECTION 1. Recitals. The Planning Commission hereby finds that the foregoing recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein as substantive findings of this Resolution. SECTION 2. Findings on Precise Plan. As required by Palm Desert Municipal Code “PDMC” Section 25.72.030 (E), the Planning Commission makes the following findings to approve the PP: 1. Consideration is given and restrictions are imposed to the extent necessary, given the size and shape of the parcel and the present and proposed zoning and use of the subject property and the surrounding property, to permit the same degree of enjoyment of the subject property, but subject to the same degree of protection of adjoining properties, as would be accorded in normal circumstances by the standard restrictions imposed by Chapter 25.72.030. The project, as conditioned, meets all the requirements of the underlying zoning designation and provides this project the with same allowances that its surrounding properties would be governed by. 2. The proposed precise plan is not found to substantially depreciate property values in the vicinity nor would the plan unreasonably interfere with the use or enjoyment of property in the vicinity by the occupants thereof for lawful purposes or would endanger the public peace, health, safety, or general welfare, as conditioned. 3. The Architectural Review Commission approved a design review on May 14, 2024. SECTION 3. CEQA. The application has complied with the requirements of the “City of Palm Desert Procedure for Implementation of CEQA” Resolution No. 2019-41, in that the Planning Commission finds that the Project is consistent with the approved General Plan and Zoning Ordinance and that other project-specific impacts were evaluated in the Initial Study (15183 Analysis) prepared for the project and that no further environmental review is required under State CEQA Guidelines 15183. CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 allows for a streamlined environmental review process for projects, which are consistent with the development density established by existing zoning, community plan, or General Plan policies for which an EIR was certified, except as might be necessary to examine whether 96 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2874 there are project-specific significant effects which are peculiar to the Project or its sites. If the above qualifications are met, as stated in Section 15183(b), “a public agency shall limit its examination of environmental effects to those which the agency determines, in an initial study or other analysis: (1) are peculiar to the Project or the parcel on which the Project would be located, (2) were not analyzed as significant effects in a prior EIR on the zoning action, General Plan or community plan, with which the Project is consistent, (3) are potentially significant off-site impacts, and cumulative impacts which were not discussed in the prior EIR prepared for the General Plan, community plan or zoning action, or the Project’s CEQA Section 15183 Analysis (4) are previously identified significant effects which, as a result of substantial new information, which was not known at the time the EIR was certified, are determined to have a more severe adverse impact than discussed in the prior EIR.” An Initial Study has been prepared to document the findings to satisfy the requirements of CEQA Guidelines Section 15183. It analyzes the potential environmental effects of the proposed Project and evaluates whether they were adequately analyzed in a prior EIR such that the above-identified streamlining criteria apply. The Project is consistent with the Palm Desert General Plan Update (General Plan Update), for which an EIR (SCH No. 2015081020) was certified. The General Plan Update provides a framework for future growth of the City and projects the development reasonably expected to occur during the buildout period. The Genal Plan Update EIR analyzed the environmental impacts associated with the adoption and implementation of the General Plan Update. The proposed Project is permitted in the zoning district where the Project site is located and consistent with the land uses, density, and vision of the 2040 Palm Desert General Plan; and SECTION 4. Custodian of Records. The documents and materials that constitute the record of proceedings on which these findings are based are located at the City’s office at 73510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, CA 92260. Richard D. Cannone, AICP, the Secretary to the Palm Desert Planning Commission, is the custodian of the record of proceedings. SECTION 5. Project Approval. The Planning Commission hereby approves Case No. PP23-0023, subject to the conditions of exhibit A of this resolution. SECTION 6. Execution of Resolution. The Chairperson of the Planning Commission signs this Resolution, and the Secretary to the Commission shall attest and certify to the passage and adoption thereof. ADOPTED ON June 18, 2024 JOSEPH PRADETTO CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: 97 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2874 RICHARD D. CANNONE, AICP SECRETARY I, Richard D. Cannone, AICP, Secretary of the City of Palm Desert, hereby certify that Resolution No. 2874 is a full, true, and correct copy, and was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert on June 18, 2024, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSED: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Palm Desert, California, on June 18, 2024. RICHARD D. CANNONE, AICP SECRETARY 98 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2874 EXHIBIT A CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO. PP23-0023 PLANNING DIVISION: 1. The development of the property shall conform substantially with exhibits on file with the Development Services Department, except as modified by the following conditions. Any variation from the approved plans must be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division prior to the building permit issuance and may require review and approval by the Architectural Review Commission, Planning Commission, and/or City Council. 2. The Applicant agrees that in the event of any administrative, legal, or equitable action instituted by a third party challenging the validity of any of the procedures leading to the adoption of these project approvals for the Project, or the project approvals themselves, the Developer and City each shall have the right, in their sole discretion, to elect whether or not to defend such action. Developer, at its sole expense, shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City (including its agents, officers, and employees) from any such action, claim, or proceeding with counsel c hosen by the City, subject to the Developer’s approval of counsel, which shall not be unreasonably denied, and at the Developer’s sole expense. If the City is aware of such an action or proceeding, it shall promptly notify the Developer and cooperate in the defense. The Developer, upon such notification, shall deposit with City sufficient funds in the judgment of the City Finance Director to cover the expense of defending such action without any offset or claim against said deposit to assure that the City expends no City funds. If both Parties elect to defend, the Parties hereby agree to affirmatively cooperate in defending said action and to execute a joint defense and confidentiality agreement in order to share and protect the information under the joint defense privilege recognized under applicable law. As part of the cooperation in defending an action, City and Developer shall coordinate their defense in order to make the most efficient use of legal counsel and to share and protect information. Develope r and City shall each have sole discretion to terminate its defense at any time. The City shall not settle any third-party litigation of project approvals without the Developer’s consent, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned, or de layed unless the Developer materially breaches this indemnification requirement. 3. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein, which are in addition to the approved development standards listed in the PDMC, and state and federal statutes now in force. 4. The PP shall expire if construction of the said Project shall not commence within 24 months from the date of approval of the final map for Vesting Tentative Tract Map (VTTM) 38866 approved by Planning Commission Resolution No. 2873, unless an 99 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2874 extension of time is granted by the Palm Desert Planning Commission; otherwise, said approval shall become null, void, and of no effect whatsoever. 5. Prior to the expiration of th is Precise Plan, the applicant may request a one (1) year time extension by filing a written request with the Development Services Department for consideration by the Planning Commission. Any request for an extension shall be noticed and be considered at a public hearing held before the original approval body. 6. The approved PP shall only be modified with written City approval per PDMC Chapter 25.72.030. Any proposed changes to this PP will require an amendment to the application, which may result in a new public hearing. 7. The applicant shall pay all applicable fees in effect at the time of the effective date of approval of this permit. 8. The Applicant shall pay all appropriate park fees per PDMC Section 26.48.06 0. 9. This Project is subject to payment of the City’s Public Art fee. The fee will be applied at the time of a building permit issuance and shall remain in the City’s public art fund. 10. The Applicant shall execute a written acknowledgment to the Planning Di vision stating acceptance of and compliance with all the Conditions of Approval of Resolution No. 2874 and that the plans submitted are in compliance with the Conditions of Approval. No modifications shall be made to said plans without written approval fro m the appropriate decision-making body. 11. The Applicant and/or any successor in interest shall comply with all applicable local, state, and federal laws and regulations. 12. A copy of the herein-listed Conditions of Approval shall be included in the construction documentation package for the Project, which shall be continuously maintained on - site during Project construction. 13. The Applicant shall abide all conditions of approval of Planning Commission Resolution No. 2873. 14. The project comply with all requirements Palm Desert Municipal Code (PDMC) Chapter 9.24 for Noise Control Requirements. 15. All construction documentation shall be coordinated for consistency, including, but not limited to, architectural, structural, mechanical, electrical, plumbing, landscape and irrigation, grading, and street improvement plans. All such plans shall be consistent with the approved entitlement plans on file with the Development Services Department. 100 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2874 16. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for the construction of any use or structure contemplated by this approval, the Applicant shall first obtain permits and/or clearance from the following agencies: Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) City of Palm Desert Public Works Department Riverside County Fire Department City of Palm Desert Land Development Division City of Palm Desert Planning Division City of Palm Desert Building and Safety Division Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to the Building & Safety Division at the time of issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. 17. Prior to permit issuance, the permittee shall prepare and submitted a written report to the Director of Development Services demonstrating compliance with these conditions of approval, and any mitigation measures required by the Palm Desert General Plan Environmental Impact Report (SCH # 2015081020). 18. The Applicant shall provide payment for filing fees for the Notice of Exemption within five (5) days of the Planning Commission approval of this project. 19. Prior to building permit issuance, final lighting plans shall be submitted per PDMC Section 24.16 for any landscape, architectural, street, or other lighting types within the Project area. All exterior lighting sources shall be fully shielded and directed downwards and is subject to approval by the Development Services Department. Luminaries with total lamp lumens above 16,000 lumens shall not be used. Prior to the building permit issuance, the Applicant shall submit plans for outdoor lighting as required by PDMC Section 24.16.030 and include glare ratings and color temperature for all exterior light fixtures. 20. Prior to the building permit issuance, the Applicant shall submit a landscape construction application for approval by the Development Services Department and Coachella Valley Water District for the front yard typical landscaping and common area landscaping. Final landscape and irrigation documents shall be prepared by a landscape architect registered with the State of California and shall be submitted to the Development Services Department and the CVWD for review and approval. All sheets shall be signed by the landscape architect and shall include the license number and the expiration date. The landscape plan shall conform to the preliminary landscape plans prepared as part of this application dated April 17, 2024 and shall include plantings of live landscape material. All plants shall be a minimum of five (5) gallons in size, and all trees shall be a minimum 24 -inch box in size. 101 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2874 A. The Applicant shall submit final landscape construction plans to the Palm Desert Development Services Department for review and acceptance prior to submittal to CVWD. 21. All Project irrigation systems shall function properly, and common area landscaping shall be maintained in a healthy and thriving condition for the life of this permit. The maintenance of common area landscaping and the irrigation system shall be permanently provided for all common areas of the Project site, as well as walkways. Furthermore, the plans shall identify responsibility for the continued maintenance. 22. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy of any residential unit of the tract, the front yard landscaping of said unit shall be completes in accordance with the approved plan. 23. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy of the final unit of the tract, the Project landscape architect shall submit written certification to the Planning Division that all landscaping and irrigation has been installed per the approved landscape plans. 24. The building plans shall be consistent with the approved elevations and exhibits of the preliminary development plans dated April 16, 2024, except as modified by these conditions. Exterior building elevations showing building wall materials, roof types, exterior colors, and appropriate vertical dimensions shall be included in the development construction drawings. 25. The building plans shall abide by the Architectural Review Commission approval of Design Review 23-0023 of the May 14, 2024, approval as summarized in the “Notice of Action” dated May 28, 2024. 26. Prior to building permit issuance, the Applicant shall submit plans for the final design of all site walls, fences and gates subject to review and approval by the Palm Desert Development Services Department. The fence and wall plans shall substantially conform with the Preliminary Fence and Wall exhibit included with the Preliminary Landscape Exhibit dated June 10, 2024 except as modified by Conditions of the Architectural Review Commission approval of May 14, 2024. A. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for any residential unit in the tract, the perimeter walls of the respective lot shall be completed. B. Prior to the issuance of the certificate of occupancy for the final unit of the tract, all site walls, fences, and gates shall be completed. 27. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the final unit of the tract, the applicant shall construct a monument sign at the westerly entrance of the tract. All exterior signage shall comply with Chapter 25.56 of the PDMC and may require approval by the Palm Desert Architectural Review Commission. 102 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2874 28. The Applicant shall construct the pedestrian circulation network as shown on the approved preliminary exhibits including the Preliminary Grading Plan Dated April 19, 2024 and Preliminary Landscaping Exhibit dated Jun e 10, 2024. The pedestrian connections shall, at a minimum comply with building requirements for width and access. 29. All ground-mounted utility structures including, but not limited to, transformers, HVAC equipment, and backflow prevention valves shall be l ocated out of direct view from any public street or adequately screened using landscaping and/or permanent screening devices. 30. The Applicant shall establish a homeowners’ association (HOA). The HOA’s responsibility for maintenance shall include but is not limited to maintenance of private amenity areas and open space, landscaping, stormwater retention, and related infrastructure. The final maintenance plan shall include detailed text and illustrative diagrams indicating areas of responsibility for maintenance and shall be subject to approval by the Director of Development Services and City Engineer. 31. The lot and development standards of the tract shall be as listed below. Any request to amend these standards for the tract shall require an amendment of this Precise Plan. Development Standard Requirement Lot Standards Minimum Lot Area (Square-Feet) 5,500 SF Minimum Lot Width (Feet) 50’-0” Minimum Lot Depth (Feet) 110’-0” Building Standards Minimum Front Yard – Living Area (Feet) 10’-0” Minimum Front Yard – Garage (Feet) 18’-0” Minimum Side Yard - Interior and Street (Feet) 5’-0” Minimum Rear Yard (Feet) 10’-0” Maximum Building Height (Feet) 18’-0” Maximum Lot Coverage (Percentage) 52% 32. Accessory structures within the tract shall be subject to the Accessory Residential Structure Chapter of the Palm Desert Municipal Code Section 25.40.050 established pursuant to Ordinance 1267A. 33. Allowable encroachments shall be subject to the requirements of Palm Desert Municipal Code Section 25.40.030 established pursuant to Ordinance 1393. 34. To avoid impacting nesting birds, one of the following must be implemented by the project: 103 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2874 Conduct grading and/or ground disturbing activities from September 16 th through January 31st when birds are not likely to be nesting on the site; OR Prior to any ground disturbing activities occurring between February 1st and September 15th, in accordance with the Biological Resource Assessment prepared by Jennings Environmental Dated December 2023 and the recommendations made therein, a qualified a qualified Avian Biologist will conduct pre‐construction Nesting Bird Surveys (NBS) no more than 3-days prior to Project‐related disturbance to nestable vegetation to identify any active nests. If no active nests are found, no further action will be required. If an active nest is found, the biologist will set appropriate no ‐ work buffers around the nest which will be based upon the nesting species, its sensitivity to disturbance, nesting stage, and expected types, intensity, and duration of the disturbance. The nests and buffer zones shall be field checked weekly by a qualified biological monitor. The approved no‐work buffer zone shall be clearly marked in the field, within which no disturbance activity shall commence until the qualified biologist has determined the young birds have successfully fledged and the nest is inactive. Prior to grading permit issuance, the applicant shall submit a fully executed copy of the contract with a qualified Avian Biologist to the Development Services Department. 35. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall pay all applicable Local Development Mitigation Fees required of the development in accordance with the Coachella Valley Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan (CVMSHCP). 36. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the project applicant shall retain a qualified archaeologist and shall submit a fully executed copy of the contract with said qualified archaeologist to the Development Services Department. In the event that potentially significant archaeological materials are encountered during construction and/or any ground-disturbing activities, all work shall be halted in the vicinity of the discovery until the qualified archaeologist can assess the significance and integrity of the find. In the event of any discoveries the Department of Development Services shall be immediately notified. If intact and significant archaeological remains are encountered, the impacts of the project should be mitigated appropriately. 37. All concrete driveway aprons within the subdivision shall extend to th e property line. 38. The final building pad elevations shall conform to the approved pad elevations for each lot shown in Exhibit B of Planning Commission Resolution 2873. Deviation from these approved pad elevations may be permitted in accordance with Palm D esert Municipal Code Section 27.12.045 pursuant to Ordinance 1382. ENGINEERING DIVISION: 39. The following plans, studies, and exhibits are hereby referenced: Shadow Ridge Preliminary Grading and Utility Plan, prepared by Wilson Mikami Corporation and dated April 19, 2024. 104 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2874 40. It is understood that the conceptual exhibits correctly show all existing easements, traveled ways, and drainage courses with appropriate Qs, and that ma jor modification with the final plans and reports may require the applicant to process a revised site plan through Planning Commission as directed by the City Engineer. 41. It is assumed that easements shown on the preliminary grading exhibit are shown correctly and include all the easements that encumber the subject property. A current preliminary title report for the site will be required to be submitted during technical plan review. The applicant shall secure approval from all, if any, easement holders for all grading and improvements, which are proposed over the respective easement or provide evidence that the easement has been relocated, quitclaimed, vacated, abandoned, easement holder cannot be found, or is otherwise of no effect. Should such approvals or alternate actions regarding the easements not be provided and approved by the City, the applicant may be required to amend or revise the proposed site configuration as may be necessary. 42. If the developer chooses to construct the project in phases, a Constru ction Phasing Plan for the construction of improvements shall be submitted for review and approved by the City Engineer. 43. All utility extensions within the site shall be placed underground unless otherwise specified or allowed by the respective utility purveyor. 44. Prior to any work within the public right-of-way, the applicant shall obtain an encroachment permit from the City’s Public Works Department. 45. Prior to issuance of grading permit, the applicant shall submit final Grading Plans, at a scale no smaller than 1”=40’, for review and approval by the City Engineer. Final grading plans shall conform to the approved Conceptual Grading Plan, the California Building Code, PDMC Title 27 Grading, and all other relevant laws, rules, and regulations governing grading in the City of Palm Desert. A. The grading plan and hydrology report shall provide for acceptance and proper conveyance of all off -site or on-site drainage flowing onto or through the site. B. Infiltration rates, for purposes of sizing retention facilities in the final hydrology report, shall be no more 2 inches per hour and only if percolation tests are conducted in the field by a licensed geotechnical engineer, validating at least twice this amount. C. Pad elevations, as shown on the conceptual exhibit, are subject to review and modification per Chapter 27 of the PDMC. 46. Prior to grading plan approval, project entrances along Shadow Ridge Road (Private), accessed via Monterey Avenue and Gerald Ford Drive, shall provide the following: 105 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2874 A. A vehicle stacking lane with a minimum length of 60-ft from entry street’s curb face to provide for three car queuing in front of a keypad, gate house or entry devise B. A second entry lane for residents, separate from guests, must be provided if gate is restricted. C. An adequate vehicle turnaround area must be provided in front of the gate if access is denied or not allowed. Design must be approved by the City Engineer. D. A separate pedestrian entry for entrance and exit must be provided and approved by the City Engineer to avoid pedestrian vehicular interaction. E. Adequate signage from a gated entrance that clearly designates any restricted access must be provided and shown on the Street Improvement Plans to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 47. Prior to issuance of grading permit, the applicant shall obtain proper authorization for any work outside the project boundary, including easement(s) for grading, access, and maintenance of proposed offsite slopes. For all other temporary offsite grading, written permission from adjacent property owners shall be submitted prior to grading permit issuance. 48. Installation of full trash capture systems will be required at all new and existing catch basins within the project site to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and included for perpetual maintenance in the Final WQMP. 49. Prior to issuance of grading permit, the applicant shall prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) in conformance with the State’s current Construction Activities Storm Water General Permit. 50. Prior to approval of the grading plans, the applicant shall provide the City Engineer with evidence that a Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed with the State Water Resources Control Board. Such evidence shall consist of a copy of the NOI stamped by the State Water Resources Control Board or the Regional Water Quality Control Board, or a letter from either agency stating that the NOI has been filed. The Waste Discharger’s Identification number (WDID#) shall be noted on the grading plans. 51. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall submit a PM10 application for review and approval. The applicant shall comply with all provisions of PDMC Section 24.12 regarding Fugitive Dust Control. 52. Prior to issuance of grading permit, the applicant shall obtain the relevant permit(s) for the hauling of imported or exported earthwork materials. 106 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2874 53. Prior to issuance of grading permit, a site-specific geotechnical report shall be submitted for review and approval and the Geotechnical Engineer shall approve the grading plans are in conformance to their recommendations and conclusions. 54. It is assumed that the grading and the provisions for water quality management shown on the conceptual grading exhibit and Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan can comply with all requirements for a Final Water Quality Management Plan (F-WQMP), without substantial change from that shown. Prior to approval of the grading plan the applicant shall submit a Final WQMP in conformance with the requirements of the Riverside County Floo d Control and Water Conservation District (RCFC&WCD) Whitewater River Watershed area for approval of the City Engineer. 55. Prior to issuance of grading permit, and in compliance with the City’s Municipal Code Chapter 27.24, the applicant shall enter into an a greement and post financial security to guarantee the safe completion of grading operations and implementation, including as necessary, maintenance of erosion control measures. 56. The applicant shall monitor, supervise, and control all construction related a ctivities, so as to prevent these activities from causing a public nuisance, including but not limited to, insuring strict adherence to the following: A. Removal of dirt, debris, or other construction material deposited on any public street no later than the end of each working day. B. Observance of working hours as stipulated on permits issued by the Land Development Division. C. The construction site shall accommodate onsite parking of all motor vehicles used by persons working at or providing deliveries to the site. D. All dust control measures per PM10 and South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) requirements during the grading operations. Violation of any condition, restriction or prohibition set forth in these conditions shall subject the owner, applicant, developer or contractor(s) to remedy as noted in Section 24.12.070 of the Municipal Code. In addition, the City Engineer may suspend all construction related activities for violation of any condition, restriction or prohibition set forth in these conditions until such time as it has been determined that all operations and activities are in conformance with these conditions. 57. Prior to building permit issuance, the applicant shall record the final map related to VTTM No. 38866. 58. Prior to building permit issuance for the first building, an emergency vehicle access road(s) shall be constructed per Fire Department’s requirements. 107 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2874 59. Prior to building permit issuance, the applicant shall pay all appropriate signalization and impact fees in accordance with the City’s Resolution No. 79-17 and 79-55. 60. Prior to building permit issuance, the project’s Geotechnical Engineer shall certify the completion of grading in conformance with the recommendations of the approved geotechnical report. 61. Prior to building permit issuance, applicant shall provide grading pad or form certification by a licensed Land Surveyor or Civil Engineer of Record in a form approved by the City Engineer. 62. Prior to occupancy for the first building, the applicant shall provide to the City written proof of Coachella Valley Water District acceptance of all relevant water and sewer improvements. 63. Prior to occupancy for the first building, the applicant shall complete all public improvements in conformance with the current City standards, including but no t limited to the following: A. Street improvements, to include any required emergency access routes, completed with, but not limited to, pavement, base, curb and/or gutter repair, sidewalk repairs, driveway approaches, pedestrian ramps, curb ramps, signing, striping, landscaping and irrigation. B. Sewer and water systems C. Undergrounding of all proposed utilities D. Storm drain facilities such as storm drain laterals and catch basins as applicable. BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION: 64. This project shall comply with the latest adopted edition of the following codes: A. California Building Code and its appendices and standards. B. California Residential Code and its appendices and standards. C. California Plumbing Code and its appendices and standards. D. California Mechanical Code and its appendices and standards. E. California Electrical Code. F. California Energy Code. G. California Green Building Standards Code. H. Title 24, California Code of Regulations. I. California Fire Code and its appendices and standards. 65. The Applicant shall coordinate directly with: Riverside County Fire Marshal’s Office CAL FIRE/Riverside County Fire Department 108 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2874 Main: (760) 863-8886 77933 Las Montañas Road, Suite 201 Palm Desert, CA 92211 66. All contractors and subcontractors shall have a current City of Palm Desert Business License before permit issuance per PDMC, Title 5. 67. All contractors and/or owner-builders must submit a valid Certificate of Workers’ Compensation Insurance coverage before the issuance of a building permit per California Labor Code, Section 3700. 68. Address numerals shall comply with Palm Desert Ordinance No. 1351 (PDMC Section 15.28). Compliance with Ordinance 1351 regarding street address location, dimension, a stroke of line, distance from the street, height from grade, height from the street, etc., shall be shown on all architectural building elevations in detail. Any possible obstructions, shadows, lighting, landscaping, backgrounds, or other reasons that may render the building address unreadable shall be addressed during the plan review process. The Applicant may request a copy of Ordinance 1351 or PDMC Section 15.28 from the Building and Safety Division counter staff. FIRE DEPARTMENT: 69. Prior to grading permit issuance, the applicant or developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to the Fire Department for review. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer, containing a Fire Department approval signature block, and shall conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow. Once plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be presented to the Fire Department for signature. 70. Prior to grading permit issuance, the applicant shall submit Precise Grading Plans identifying on-parcel Fire Access Road improvements to all structures in compliance with Fire Department Standards. 71. Prior to building permit issuance, if construction is phased, an approved phasing plan shall be approved by the Fire Department. Each phase shall provide approved access and water supply for fire protection prior to any construction. Contact the Riverside County Fire Marshal’s office for submittal instructions. 72. Prior to building permit issuance, the required water system, including all fire hydrant(s), shall be installed, and accepted by the appropriate water agency and the Riverside County Fire Department prior to any combustible building material placed on an individual lot. Contact the Riverside County Fire Department to inspect the required fire flow, street signs, all weather surface, and all access and/or secondary access. Approved water plans must be at the job site. 109 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2874 73. Prior to permit issuance, submittal of construction plans to the Fire Department will be required. This will require a separate permit application submitted directly to the Fire Department. This shall include a full site plan including all fire apparatus access roads. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when the Fire Department reviews these plans. These conditions will be based on California Fire Code, California Building Code (CBC), and related codes/standards adopted at the time of construction plan submittal. Contact the Riverside County Fire Marshal’s office for submittal instructions. END OF CONDITIONS 110 C I T Y O F P A L M D E S E R T 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260-2578 TEL: 760-346-0611 PLANNING@PALMDESERT.GOV CITY OF PALM DESERT PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE CASE NOs. TTM23-0005 (VTTM 38866) / PP23-0023 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, TO CONSIDER A REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF A VESTING TENTATIVE MAP TO SUBDIVIDE A 20.69-ACRE PROPERTY INTO A 93-UNIT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIALSUBDIVISION AND A PRECISE PLAN FOR THE SITE PLANNING AND ARCHITECTURE FOR THE PROPOSED SINGLE- FAMILY DWELLINGS AND FINDING THE PROJECT IS EXEMPT FROM FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT The City of Palm Desert (City), in its capacity as the Lead Agency for this project and pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), has determined the project to be exempt from further environmental review pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section §15183 – Projects Consistent with a Community Plan or Zoning PROJECT LOCATION: Assessor’s Parcel Numbers (APNs) 694-290-010, -011, 694-320-010, and -011. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The proposal is a request by Toll Brothers (Applicant) approval of a Vesting Tentative Tract Map, and Precise Plan for a proposed residential subdivision within the Marriott Shadow Ridge development located east of Monterey Avenue on Shadow Ridge Road. The project proposes to subdivide a vacant 20.69-acre property within Marriott Shadow Ridge into 93 single-family residential lots, with gated private streets, and private community open space. PUBLIC HEARING: NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, will hold a Public Hearing on Tuesday, June 18, 2024. The Planning Commission meeting begins at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber at 73510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California. Pursuant to Assembly Bill 2449, this meeting may be conducted as a hybrid meeting, allowing public access via teleconference or in person. Options for remote participation will be listed on the Posted Agenda for the meeting at: https://www.palmdesert.gov/connect/committees-and-commissions/planning-commission. PUBLIC REVIEW: Information concerning the project is available for public review in the Development Services – Planning Division office at 73510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California, during regular business hours. Written comments may be submitted to the Planning Commission by letter to the address below or by email at planning@palmdesert.gov. Emails received by 3:00 p.m. prior to the meeting will be distributed to the Commission. Any correspondence received during or after the meeting will be distributed to the Commission as soon as practicable and retained for the official record. Any challenge of the proposed project in court may be limited to raising only those issues raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Division at, or prior, to the public hearing. (Government Code Section 65009[b][2]). Nick Melloni, AICP, Principal Planner City of Palm Desert 73510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 (760) 346-0611, Extension 479 nmellloni@palmdesert.gov PUBLISH: THE DESERT SUN RICHARD D. CANNONE, AICP, SECRETARY June 7, 2024 PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION 111 112 CITY OF PALM DESERT 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260-2578 TEL: 760-346-0611 PLANNING@PALMDESERT.GOV ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION NOTICE OF ACTION May 28, 2024 Toll Brothers Mr. Eric Everhart 350 Commerce, Suite 200 Irvine, CA 92602 Subject: Consideration to approve a Design Review (DR) for a Precise Plan (PP) and Environmental Assessment (EA) to develop a 93-unit single-family residential subdivision on a 20.69-acre property within the existing Marriott Shadow Ridge Development located at Assessor Parcel Nos. 694-290-010, -011, 694-320-010, and -011. The Architectural Review Commission of the City of Palm Desert considered your request and took the following action at its meeting of May 14, 2024: Following discussion, MOTION BY COMMISSIONER MCAULIFFE, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER COLVARD CARRIED 6-0, (COMMISSIONER BLAKELEY ABSENT); to approve Case No. DR23-0023 with the following conditions: 1. Columns shown on rear porches shall be based off the originally proposed “L” shape and shall be squared off to create a larger mass. 2. Entry wall pilasters shall have stone veneer reverted back to precision block or alternate material. Pursuant to Palm Desert Municipal Code Section 25.60.080, any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk, City of Palm Desert, within 15 days of the date of the decision. If you have any questions, please contact Principal Planner, Nick Melloni, at (760) 776-6479 or nmelloni@palmdesert.gov. Sincerely, CARLOS FLORES, SECRETARY ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION cc: File 113 114 STREET 'B'SHEET 3 38 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 39 44 40 41 42 43 46 45 47 48 50 49 53 51 52 54 55 56 57 60 58 59 63 61 62 64 65 66 69 67 68 71 70 72 87 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 88 91 89 90 92 93 B A B B C D G H I J K L E F SHEET 4 SHEET 5 SHEET 6 SHAD O W R I D G E R O A D STREET 'C 'STREET 'A ' STREE T ' C' C C STRE E T ' A ' M TITLE SHEET 1 SHADOW RIDGE VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 38866 SHEET LEGEND LEGEND 2 A INDEX MAP RECORD OWNER: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: GENERAL NOTES: CORPORATION WILSON MIKAMI BASIS OF BEARING:BENCHMARK:VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 38866 SHADOW RIDGE VICINITY MAP PROJECT LOCATION 115 CORPORATION WILSON MIKAMI BASIS OF BEARING:BENCHMARK:VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 38866 SHADOW RIDGE STATISTICAL SUMMARY AND SECTIONSTRACT 38866 - NUMBERED LOTS TRACT 38866 - LETTERED LOTS 2 TRACT 38866 - LAND USE SUMMARY STATISTICAL SUMMARY AND SECTIONS SECTION "A-A" A PORTION OF STREET "A" AND STREET 'B' (PRIVATE STREET) SECTION "C-C" A PORTION OF STREET "C" (PRIVATE STREET) SECTION "C1-C1" A PORTION OF STREET "A" AND STREET "C" (PRIVATE STREET) SECTION "E-E" PRIVATE COURT SECTION "C2-C2" A PORTION OF STREET "B" (PRIVATE STREET) SECTION "B-B" A PORTION OF STREET "A" (PRIVATE STREET) 116 STREET 'C'STREET 'C' STREET 'A'STREET 'A'STREET 'B'S T R E E T ' B ' S.S. D.W. S.S. D.W.S.S.D.W.S.S. D.W. S. D .D.W.S.D.D.W.S.D.S. S .S.D .S.D.S.D.S.D.B- B 2 A-AC1-C12C-C 2 C1-C12E-E2E-E 2 A-A250'52'52'50'50'50' 48' 2' 50' 50' 50' 65' 50'50'139'50'50'10'40'50'50'50'65'85' 31' 50'50'50'50'50'50'50' 51 ' 50'12' 51 '50'5 0 ' 50'3 0 ' 3 '1 7 ' 37' 2'26'11'1'109'9'40'11'37'8'38' 45'16'14'181'14' 1 6 '45'45'5 '34'109'50'50'50'50'110'110'110'110'110'109'110'110'110'110'110'104'104'60'50'50'50'50'50'110'110'50'50'50'50'50'110'111'113'114'116'123'129'136'149'130'82' 118'50'50'50'125' 130' 130' 135' 113' 113'50'50'110'50'50'50'50'50'110'110'110'110'110'110'64'58'133'50'5 0 ' 5 0 ' 5 0 ' 5 0 '165'154'142'131'50'50'5 0 ' 5 0 ' 5 0 '176'176'176'176'23'2 6 ' 2' 50'50'50'50'5'20'26'3 1' 108' 1 3 '5'26'14' 5 ' 3 6 '14'50' 47'3 ' 5 4 '3 4 '10'63' 6 2 '4'31'2' 4'46'21'79'8'43'8 '25'4 0 '87'16'36'40 ' 4 5 '31'10'39'2 2 '51' 66' 8 5 '80'20'33'4'8'8'57' 7 1 '27'1 6 '4'13'3 4 '4'47'CORPORATION WILSON MIKAMI BASIS OF BEARING:BENCHMARK:VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 38866 SHADOW RIDGE INDEX MAP EASEMENT NOTES DW SS SD LEGEND ////// SHEET 3 SHEET 4 SHEET 5 SHE E T 6 SHADOW RIDGE-V.T.T.M. NO. 38866 SEE SHEET 4SEE SHEET 4 117 STREET 'B' D.W. S.D. S.S.A-A210' 41'50'51'50'12'66' 51' 51' 51' 68' 72' 40' 50' 44' 54'50'50'50'50'50'50'50'50' 40'10 '110'64'5 8 '133'50'50'50'50'50'5 1' 5 1 ' 5 1 ' 5 1 '165'154'142'131'120'114'139'169'205'6 8 ' 6 8 ' 6 8 ' 4 5 '50'50'50'50'50'50'176'176'176'176'176'176'176'174'168'157'161'5'5' 8' 16'34'4'CORPORATION WILSON MIKAMI BASIS OF BEARING:BENCHMARK:VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 38866 SHADOW RIDGE INDEX MAP SHEET 4 SHEET 5 SHEET 3 SHE E T 6 SHADOW RIDGE-V.T.T.M. NO. 38866 EASEMENT NOTES DW SS SD LEGEND //////SEE SHEET 3SEE SHEET 5SEE SHEET 3SEE SHEET 5118 STREET 'B' D.W. S.S.A-A250' 31' 4 0 '86'13' 50' 50' 50'50' 50'17'33'50'50'55'55'129'75' 50' 64' 67' 44' 23' 50'50'50'11'39'50'50'50'50'50'44' 54' 50' 16 '34'18'3 2 ' 8' 270 . 1 5 ' 51' 51' 51'205'221'150'152'154'156'157'159'160'160'160'158'148'50'50'50'50'50'50'50'73' 94' 50' 50' 46' 50' 50' 50'2 9 '21'50'50'50'50'50'50'50'31'19 '6 8 ' 68'168'157'161'162'163'164'165'166'167'166'165'165'170'172'161'156'154'4' 8' CORPORATION WILSON MIKAMI BASIS OF BEARING:BENCHMARK:VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 38866 SHADOW RIDGE INDEX MAP SHEET 5 SHEET 3 SHEET 4 SHE E T 6 SHADOW RIDGE-V.T.T.M. NO. 38866 EASEMENT NOTES DW SS SD LEGEND //////SEE SHEET 6SEE SHEET 6SEE SHEET 4SEE SHEET 4119 STREET 'B' D.W. S.S.S.D .A-A2C2-C22129'60'106' 54' 15'42'50'50'50'50'50' 8 '270.15' 2 1 0 '3 0 5 ' 23' 33' 21' 2 8 '31' 5 0 '66' 3 4 '16'50'50'50'50'50'6 '156'154'153'151'149'148'113'135'120'32'112'5 4 ' 47' 4' 2 6 1' 8 '32'CORPORATION WILSON MIKAMI BASIS OF BEARING:BENCHMARK:VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 38866 SHADOW RIDGE INDEX MAP SHEET 5 SHEET 3 SHEET 4 SHE E T 6 SHADOW RIDGE-V.T.T.M. NO. 38866 EASEMENT NOTES DW SS SD LEGEND //////SEE SHEET 5SEE SHEET 5120 DESIGNATED REMAINDER NO. 5DESIGNATED REMA INDERNO. 4LOT ELOT D191522DESIGNATED REMAINDER NO. 4LOT DLOT C1919191415LOT KDESIGNATED REMAINDER NO. 5DESIGNATED REMA INDERNO. 4LOT ELOT D191522DESIGNATED REMAINDER NO. 4LOT DLOT C1919191415LOT KCORPORATION WILSON MIKAMI BASIS OF BEARING:BENCHMARK:VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 38866 SHADOW RIDGE EASEMENT NOTES LEGENDSHADOW RIDGE-V.T.T.M. NO. 38866 121 122 1 3R-5CN 2 2-5IN 3 1-1CN 4 3R-1IN 5 1-4IN 6 1R-1CN 7 2-3CN 8 3R-5CN 9 2-5IN 10 1R-4IN 11 3-1IN 14 2R-5IN 15 3-5CN 16 2R-3CN 17 1-1CN 18 3-1IN 19 2R-5IN 20 3-5CN 21 1-4IN 22 2R-3CN 23 3-1IN 24 2R-5IN 25 1-4IN 26 3R-5CN 27 1-1CN 28 2-3CN 29 3R-1CN 30 1-4IN 31 3-5CN 32 1R-1CN 33 2R-5IN 34 3-5CN 35 1-4IN 36 2R-3CN 37 1-1CN 38 2R-5IN 39 3-1INSTREET 'C'STREET 'C' STREET 'A'C1-C1C5C-C C5 C1-C1C5E-EC5E-E C5 SHADOW RIDGE | TOLL BROTHERS NOTE: SQUARE FOOTAGE MAY VARY BASED ON CALCULATION METHODS PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA Wilson Mikami Corporation 9 Corporate Park, Suite 100, Irvine, CA, 92606 T: (949) 679-0090 | F: (949) 679-0091 WILSON MIKAMICORPORATION4.19.2024 SITE PLAN C1 SHADOW RIDGE VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 38866 SITE PLAN VICINITY MAP INDEX MAP SHEET C1 SHEET C2 SHEET C3 SHT . C 4 PROJECT LOCATION PROPERTY OWNER APPLICANT/CIVIL ENGINEER WILSON MIKAMI CORPORATIONSEE SHEET C2GEOTECHNICAL ARCHITECT TOLL BROTHERS MARRIOTT OWNERSHIP RESORT, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION LGC VALLEY, INC. DW SS SD 1 LEGEND A EASEMENT NOTES 1 3R-5CN 123 13R-5CN22-5IN31-1CN83R-5CN92-5IN101R-4IN113-1IN123R-1IN131-4IN142R-5IN153-5CN162R-3CN1-1CN362R-3CN371-1CN382R-5IN393-1IN40 1-4IN 41 3R-5CN 42 1-1CN 43 3R-1IN 44 2-3CN 45 1-4IN 46 2R-5IN 47 3-5CN 48 1R-1CN 49 2-3CN 93 3-1IN 92 1-1CN 91 2R-3CN 90 1-4IN 89 3-5CN 88 2R-5IN 87 1-1CN 86 2R-3CN 85 3-1IN STREET 'C'STREET 'A'STREET 'A'STREET 'B'STREET 'B'STREET 'C'B-B C5 A-AC5C 1 - C 1 C 5 A-AC5SHADOW RIDGE | TOLL BROTHERS NOTE: SQUARE FOOTAGE MAY VARY BASED ON CALCULATION METHODS PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA Wilson Mikami Corporation 9 Corporate Park, Suite 100, Irvine, CA, 92606 T: (949) 679-0090 | F: (949) 679-0091 WILSON MIKAMICORPORATION4.19.2024 SITE PLAN C2 SHADOW RIDGE VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 38866 SITE PLAN INDEX MAP SHEET C1 SHEET C2 SHEET C3 SHT . C 4 SEE SHEET C3SEE SHEET C1DW SS SD 1 LEGEND A EASEMENT NOTES 1 3R-5CN 124 2.0' 16. 0 ' 2.5' 48 1R-1 C N 49 2-3CN 50 3R-1IN 51 2-5IN 52 1R-4IN 53 2-3CN 54 3R-5CN 55 2-5IN 56 1R-1CN 57 2-3CN 58 3R-1IN 59 1-4IN 60 2R-5IN 61 3-5CN 85 3-1IN 84 1-4IN 83 3-5CN 82 2R-3CN 81 1-1CN 80 2R-5IN 79 3-1IN 78 2R-3CN 77 3-5CN 76 1-4IN 75 2R-5IN 74 3-1IN 73 1-1CN 72 2R-3CN 71 1-4IN 70 3-5 C N 69 2R- 5 I N STREET 'B'A-AC5SHADOW RIDGE | TOLL BROTHERS NOTE: SQUARE FOOTAGE MAY VARY BASED ON CALCULATION METHODS PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA Wilson Mikami Corporation 9 Corporate Park, Suite 100, Irvine, CA, 92606 T: (949) 679-0090 | F: (949) 679-0091 WILSON MIKAMICORPORATION4.19.2024 SITE PLAN C3 SHADOW RIDGE VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 38866 SITE PLAN INDEX MAP SHEET C1 SHEET C2 SHEET C3 SHT . C 4SEE SHEET C2SEE SHEET C4DW SS SD 1 LEGEND A EASEMENT NOTES 1 3R-5CN 125 60 2R-5IN 61 3-5CN 73 1-1CN 72 2R-3C N 71 1-4IN 70 3-5CN 69 2R-5IN 68 1-1CN 67 3-1IN 66 2R-3CN 65 1-4IN 64 3-5CN 63 2R-5IN 62 1R-1IN STREET 'B'A-AC5C2-C2C514.9'41.6'1.5'9.0'1.5'34.4'13.6'6.0'6.0' 2.0' 2.0' 16.0' 2.5'67.0'2.0' 14.5'29.0'1.5'6.0'1.5'35.0'2.5' 16.0'10.0'10.0' 2.0' 11.5'80.0'25.5' 25.1' 0.5' 1.5'11.5'1.5'70.0'2.5' 16.0' 2.5' 3.5' 5.9'11.5'13.2'78.0'23.5'12.0'16.5' PLAN 2 PLAN 1 PLAN 3 69 2R-5IN 68 1-1CN 67 3-1IN SHADOW RIDGE | TOLL BROTHERS NOTE: SQUARE FOOTAGE MAY VARY BASED ON CALCULATION METHODS PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA Wilson Mikami Corporation 9 Corporate Park, Suite 100, Irvine, CA, 92606 T: (949) 679-0090 | F: (949) 679-0091 WILSON MIKAMICORPORATION4.19.2024 SITE PLAN C4 SHADOW RIDGE VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 38866 SITE PLAN INDEX MAP SHEET C1 SHEET C2 SHEET C3 SHT . C 4 TYPICAL BUILDING DIMENSIONSSEE SHEET C3DW SS SD 1 LEGEND A EASEMENT NOTES 1 3R-5CN 126 SHADOW RIDGE | TOLL BROTHERS NOTE: SQUARE FOOTAGE MAY VARY BASED ON CALCULATION METHODS PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA Wilson Mikami Corporation 9 Corporate Park, Suite 100, Irvine, CA, 92606 T: (949) 679-0090 | F: (949) 679-0091 WILSON MIKAMICORPORATION4.19.2024 SHADOW RIDGE VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 38866 CROSS-SECTIONS C5 SECTION "A-A" A PORTION OF STREET "A" AND STREET 'B' (PRIVATE STREET) SECTION "C-C" A PORTION OF STREET "C" (PRIVATE STREET) SECTION "C1-C1" A PORTION OF STREET "A" AND STREET "C" (PRIVATE STREET) SECTION "E-E" PRIVATE COURT SECTION "C2-C2" A PORTION OF STREET "B" (PRIVATE STREET) SECTION "B-B" A PORTION OF STREET "A" (PRIVATE STREET) 127 1 3R 2 2 3 1 4 3R 5 1 7 2 8 3R9 2 10 1R11 3 12 3R 13 1 14 2R 15 3 16 2R 17 1 18 3 19 2R 20 3 21 1 22 2R 23 3 24 2R 25 1 26 3R 27 1 28 2 29 3R 30 1 31 3 32 1R 33 2R34 3 35 1 36 2R37 1 38 2R39 3 40 1 41 3R 42 1 43 3R 44 2 45 1 46 2R 47 3 48 1R 49 2 50 3R 51 2 52 1R 53 2 54 3R 55 2 93 3 92 1 91 2R 90 1 89 3 88 2R 87 1 86 2R 85 3 84 1 83 3 82 2R 81 1 80 2R 79 3 6 1 STREET ' B 'STREET 'A'STRE E T ' C' STREE T ' A'STREET 'C ' STR E E T ' B ' TYPICAL RESIDENCE PARKING STALL DETAIL SHADOW RIDGE | TOLL BROTHERS NOTE: SQUARE FOOTAGE MAY VARY BASED ON CALCULATION METHODS PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA Wilson Mikami Corporation 9 Corporate Park, Suite 100, Irvine, CA, 92606 T: (949) 679-0090 | F: (949) 679-0091 WILSON MIKAMICORPORATION4.19.2024 PARKING PLAN C6 TYPICAL PARALLEL PARKING STALL DETAIL ON-STREET SHADOW RIDGE VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 38866 SEE SHEET C7128 56 1R 57 2 58 3R 59 1 60 2R 61 3 79 3 78 2R 77 3 76 1 75 2R 74 3 73 1 72 2R 71 1 70 3 69 2R 68 1 67 3 66 2R 65 1 64 363 2R62 1R STR E E T ' B ' SHADOW RIDGE | TOLL BROTHERS NOTE: SQUARE FOOTAGE MAY VARY BASED ON CALCULATION METHODS PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA Wilson Mikami Corporation 9 Corporate Park, Suite 100, Irvine, CA, 92606 T: (949) 679-0090 | F: (949) 679-0091 WILSON MIKAMICORPORATION4.19.2024 PARKING PLAN C7 SHADOW RIDGE VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 38866 PARKING PLAN SEE SHEET C6TYPICAL RESIDENCE PARKING STALL DETAIL TYPICAL PARALLEL PARKING STALL DETAIL ON-STREET 129 1 3R 2 2 3 1 4 3R 5 2 6 1R 7 2 8 3R 9 2 10 1R 11 3 12 3R 13 1 14 2R 15 3 16 2R 17 1 18 3 19 2R 20 3 21 1 22 2R 23 3 24 2R 25 1 26 3R 27 1 28 2 29 3R 30 1 31 3 32 1R 33 2R 34 3 35 1 36 2R 37 1 38 2R 39 3 401413R4 2 1 433R44245933921912R901 893882RSTREET 'C'STREET 'C' STREET 'A'STREET 'A'S T R E E T ' B 'STREET 'B'S.S. D.W. S.S. D.W.S.S.D.W.S.S. D.W.S.D.D.W.S.D.D.W.S.D.S.S.S.D .S.D.S.D.S.D.SHADOW RIDGE | TOLL BROTHERS NOTE: SQUARE FOOTAGE MAY VARY BASED ON CALCULATION METHODS PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA Wilson Mikami Corporation 9 Corporate Park, Suite 100, Irvine, CA, 92606 T: (949) 679-0090 | F: (949) 679-0091 WILSON MIKAMICORPORATION4.19.2024 PRELIMINARY GRADING AND UTILITY PLAN C8 VICINITY MAP PROJECT LOCATION INDEX MAP SHEET C8 SHEET C9SHEET C10 SHE E T C 1 1 SHADOW RIDGE-V.T.T.M. NO. 38866 DW SS SD LEGEND 1 A ////// 68 1 SEE SHEET C9 SEE SHEET C9 130 40 1 41 3R 42 1 43 3R 44 2 45 1 46 2R 47 3 48 1R 49 2 93 3 92 1 91 2R 90 1 89 3 88 2R 87 1 86 2R 85 3 84 1 STREET 'B' D.W. S.D. S.S. SHADOW RIDGE | TOLL BROTHERS NOTE: SQUARE FOOTAGE MAY VARY BASED ON CALCULATION METHODS PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA Wilson Mikami Corporation 9 Corporate Park, Suite 100, Irvine, CA, 92606 T: (949) 679-0090 | F: (949) 679-0091 WILSON MIKAMICORPORATION4.19.2024 C9 SHADOW RIDGE VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 38866 INDEX MAP PRELIMINARY GRADING AND UTILITY PLAN SHEET C8 SHEET C9SHEET C10 SHE E T C 1 1 DW SS SD LEGEND 1 A ////// 68 1 SEE SHEET C8SEE SHEET C10SEE SHEET C8SEE SHEET C10SEE SHEET C10131 48 1R 49 2 50 3R 51 2 52 1R 53 2 54 3R 55 2 56 1R 57 2 58 3R 59 1 60 2R 61 3 85 3 84 1 83 3 82 2R 81 1 80 2R 79 3 78 2R 77 3 76 1 75 2R 74 3 73 1 72 2R 71 1 70 3 69 2R STREET 'B' D.W. S.S. SHADOW RIDGE | TOLL BROTHERS NOTE: SQUARE FOOTAGE MAY VARY BASED ON CALCULATION METHODS PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA Wilson Mikami Corporation 9 Corporate Park, Suite 100, Irvine, CA, 92606 T: (949) 679-0090 | F: (949) 679-0091 WILSON MIKAMICORPORATION4.19.2024 C10 SHADOW RIDGE VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 38866 INDEX MAP PRELIMINARY GRADING AND UTILITY PLAN SHEET C8 SHEET C9 SHEET C10 SHE E T C 1 1SEE SHEET C11SEE SHEET C11SEE SHEET C9SEE SHEET C9DW SS SD LEGEND 1 A ////// 68 1 132 71 1 70 3 69 2R 68 1 67 3 66 2R 65 1 64 3 63 2R 62 1R STREET 'B' D.W. S.S.S.D . SHADOW RIDGE | TOLL BROTHERS NOTE: SQUARE FOOTAGE MAY VARY BASED ON CALCULATION METHODS PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA Wilson Mikami Corporation 9 Corporate Park, Suite 100, Irvine, CA, 92606 T: (949) 679-0090 | F: (949) 679-0091 WILSON MIKAMICORPORATION4.19.2024 C11 SHADOW RIDGE VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 38866 INDEX MAP PRELIMINARY GRADING AND UTILITY PLAN SHEET C8 SHEET C9 SHEET C10 SHE E T C 1 1SEE SHEET C10SEE SHEET C10DW SS SD LEGEND 1 A ////// 68 1 133 STREET ' B 'STREET 'A'STRE E T ' C' STRE E T ' A'STREET 'C ' STRE E T ' B ' 1 3R 2 2 3 1 4 3R 5 1 7 2 8 3R9 2 10 1R11 3 12 3R 13 1 14 2R 15 3 16 2R 17 1 18 3 19 2R 20 3 21 1 22 2R 23 3 24 2R 25 1 26 3R 27 1 28 2 29 3R 30 1 31 3 32 1R 33 2R34 3 35 1 36 2R37 1 38 2R39 3 40 1 41 3R 42 1 43 3R 44 2 45 1 46 2R 47 3 48 1R 49 2 50 3R 51 2 52 1R 53 2 54 3R 55 2 93 3 92 1 91 2R 90 1 89 3 88 2R 87 1 86 2R 85 3 84 1 83 3 82 2R 81 1 80 2R 79 3 6 1 ''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''']]SHADOW RIDGE | TOLL BROTHERS NOTE: SQUARE FOOTAGE MAY VARY BASED ON CALCULATION METHODS PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA Wilson Mikami Corporation 9 Corporate Park, Suite 100, Irvine, CA, 92606 T: (949) 679-0090 | F: (949) 679-0091 WILSON MIKAMICORPORATION4.19.2024 CONCEPTUAL WALL PLAN C12 SHADOW RIDGE VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 38866 SEE SHEET C13FENCE & WALL LEGEND ' ] 134 STR E E T ' B ' 56 1R 57 2 58 3R 59 1 60 2R 61 3 79 3 78 2R 77 3 76 1 75 2R 74 3 73 1 72 2R 71 1 70 3 69 2R 68 1 67 3 66 2R 65 1 64 363 2R62 1R ''''''''''''''''''''''''SHADOW RIDGE | TOLL BROTHERS NOTE: SQUARE FOOTAGE MAY VARY BASED ON CALCULATION METHODS PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA Wilson Mikami Corporation 9 Corporate Park, Suite 100, Irvine, CA, 92606 T: (949) 679-0090 | F: (949) 679-0091 WILSON MIKAMICORPORATION4.19.2024 C13 CONCEPTUAL WALL PLAN SEE SHEET C12SHADOW RIDGE VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 38866 FENCE & WALL LEGEND ' ] 135 DESIGNATED REMAINDER NO. 5DESIGNATED REMA INDERNO. 4LOT ELOT D191522DESIGNATED REMAINDER NO. 4LOT DLOT C1919191415LOT KDESIGNATED REMAINDER NO. 5DESIGNATED REMA INDERNO. 4LOT ELOT D191522DESIGNATED REMAINDER NO. 4LOT DLOT C1919191415LOT KSHADOW RIDGE | TOLL BROTHERS NOTE: SQUARE FOOTAGE MAY VARY BASED ON CALCULATION METHODS PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA Wilson Mikami Corporation 9 Corporate Park, Suite 100, Irvine, CA, 92606 T: (949) 679-0090 | F: (949) 679-0091 WILSON MIKAMICORPORATION4.19.2024 EASEMENT NOTES LEGEND EXISTING EASEMENTS C14 SHADOW RIDGE VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 38866 136 137 2'-0"2'-0"2'-0"2'-0"2'-0"2'-0" 5'-0"40'-0"1 1 0 ' - 0 "5 0 ' - 0 "40'-0"18'-0"9'-0"10'-0"20'-0"82'-0"5'-0"15'-0"5'-0"5'-0"40'-0"5'-0"5'-0"9'-0"9'-0"22'-0"24'-6"22'-0"5 0 ' - 0 "5 0 ' - 0 " 5 0 ' - 0 "5 0 ' - 0 "1'-0"1'-0"1'-0"1'-512"1'-512"1'-512"18'-0"18'-0"6"6"6"512"512"SHADOW RIDGE PALM DESERT, CA04-16-20248545TOLL BROTHERS0 1610 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"TOTALGARAGEOUTDOOR LIVINGOPT. GOLF CART GARAGEOPT. EXTENDED OUTDOOR LIVINGPLAN 1XPLAN 1288 SQ. FT.2,216 SF3 BDRM, 3.5 BATH2 - BAY GARAGETOTALGARAGEOUTDOOR LIVINGOPT. GOLF CART GARAGEOPT. EXTENDED OUTDOOR LIVINGPLAN 2X157 SQ. FT.2,328 SF3 BDRM, 3.5 BATH2 - BAY GARAGETOTALGARAGEOUTDOOR LIVINGOPT. GOLF CART GARAGEOPT. EXTENDED OUTDOOR LIVINGPLAN 3X180 SQ. FT.2,425 SF3 BDRM, 3.5 BATH2 - BAY GARAGE432 SQ. FT.183 SQ. FT.395 SQ. FT.2,759 SQ. FT.FLOOR AREA TABLEFLOOR AREA TABLEFLOOR AREA TABLE2,328 SQ. FT.429 SQ. FT.2,216 SQ. FT.188 SQ. FT.718 SQ. FT.2,420 SQ. FT.2,425 SQ. FT.423 SQ. FT.177 SQ. FT.457 SQ. FT.2,737 SQ. FT.OPTIONAL CASITA (TBD)OPTIONAL GOLF CART (TBD)PLAN 2PLAN 3OPTIONAL GOLF CART (TBD)OPTIONAL GOLF CART (TBD)COMPOSITE FLOOR PLANA-02OPTIONAL CASITA (TBD)OPTIONAL CASITA (TBD)138 5'-0"40'-0"1 1 0 ' - 0 "5 0 ' - 0 "5'-0"18'-0"22'-0"20'-0"70'-0"9'-0"POOL (10'-0" x 20'-0")OPT. D R .PRIMARYBATH12'-1" CLG.PRIMARYCLOSET17' L.F.10'-1" CLG.16080 GARAGE DOOR OPT. SUNVAULT ESSOPT. HUB2'-0"2'-0"GARAGE20'-0" x 20'-0"10'-1" CLG.W/H.LAUNDRYROOM8'-3" x 5'-6"10'-1" CLG.288028805'-6" x 3'-0"FREESTANDINGTUB4'-0" x 9'-0"DWPANTRY10'-1" CLG.BEDROOM 211'-2" x 11'-0"12'-1" CLG.48" COOKTOPOVEN/MICRO48" REF.OPT.SHOWER36" VANITY OPT.SHOWER36" VANITY BEDROOM 2 CLOSETBEDROOM 2BATH10'-1" CLG.BEDROOM 3 CLOSETBEDROOM 311'-0" x 11'-0"10'-1" CLG.BEDROOM 3BATH10'-1" CLG.288036" VANITY POWDERROOM10'-1" CLG.COATEVERYDAYENTRY10'-1" CLG.FOYER12'-1" CLG.FLEX ROOM/OPT. OFFICE10'-0" x 12'-0"10'-1" CLG.2880PRIMARYBEDROOM14'-8" x 14'-0"12'-1" CLG.OPT. 48" FIREPLACE9080 SL. DR./ OPT. 20080 SL. DR.OPT. 48" FIREPLACEOUTDOOR LIVING ROOM11'-6" x 25'-0"10'-1" CLG.GREAT ROOM18'-0" x 24'-7"12'-1" CLG.CASUALDINING12'-1" CLG.12'-1" CLG.10-1" CLG.O P T . D R .A/C48" VANITY72" x 48"SHOWEROPT. BARN DR.HIGH WDW.40 8 0HIGH WDW.KITCHEN12'-1" CLG.4'-5"1'-0"6"1'-512"512"PORCH10'-1" CLG.1'-0"1'-512"SHADOW RIDGE PALM DESERT, CA04-16-20248545TOLL BROTHERSPLAN 1 2,216 SQ.FT. (TARGETED FOOTAGE: 2,200 SQ.FT) 0 1610 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"REFLECTSCONTEMPORARYREFLECTSINTERNATIONALA-03139 BEDROOM 211'-2" x 11'-0"12'-1" CLG.BEDROOM 2 CLOSETOUTDOOR LIVING ROOM21'-6" x 25'-0"10'-1" CLG.40 8 0 9080 GARAGE DOORGOLF CARTGARAGE13'-0" x 13'-0"10'-1" CLG.48" FIREPLACE20080 SL. DR.OFFICE10'-0" x 12'-0"10'-1" CLG.OUTDOOR LIVING ROOM12'-0" x 15'-0"10'-1" CLG.OPT. 20080 SL. DR.1'-0"PRIMARYBEDROOM14'-8" x 14'-0"12'-1" CLG.48" FIREPLACESHADOW RIDGE PALM DESERT, CA04-16-20248545TOLL BROTHERSPLAN 1 OPTIONS 0 1610 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"OPTION FIRX0016 - 48" FIREPLACE - PRIMOAT GREAT ROOMOPTION FLPE0011 - OFFICEREPLACES FLEX ROOMOPTION FIRD0007 - EXTERIOR FIREPLACE - 48" LANAI OUTDOOR LIVING ROOMOPTION XXXXXX - 20080 SL. DR.AT GREAT ROOMOPTION XXXXXX - EXTENDED OUTDOORLIVING ROOMOPTION XXXXXX - GOLF CART GARAGEA-04140 OPT. DR.PRIMARYBATH12'-1" CLG.PRIMARYCLOSET24' L.F.10'-1" CLG.16080 GARAGE DOOR OPT. SUNVAULT ESSOPT. HUB2'-0"2'-0"GARAGE20'-0" x 20'-0"10'-1" CLG.LAUNDRYROOM8'-3" x 5'-6"10'-1" CLG.28802880KITCHEN12'-1" CLG.4'-0" x 9'-0"DWPANTRY10'-1" CLG.BEDROOM 211'-2" x 11'-0"12'-1" CLG.48" COOKTOPOVEN/MICRO48" REF.OPT.SHOWER36" VANITY OPT.SHOWER36" VANITY BEDROOM 2 CLOSETBEDROOM 2BATH10'-1" CLG.BEDROOM 3 CLOSETBEDROOM 311'-0" x 11'-0"10'-1" CLG.BEDROOM 3BATH10'-1" CLG.36" VANITY POWDERROOM10'-1" CLG.COATEVERYDAYENTRY10'-1" CLG.FOYER12'-1" CLG.2880PRIMARYBEDROOM14'-8" x 14'-0"12'-1" CLG.OPT. 48" FIREPLACE9080 SL. DR./ OPT. 20080 SL. DR.OPT. 48" FIREPLACEGREAT ROOM18'-0" x 24'-7"12'-1" CLG.CASUALDINING12'-1" CLG.12'-1" CLG.10-1" CLG.O P T . D R .A/C48" VANITY72" x 48"SHOWEROPT. BARN DR. 40 8 0 2880PANTRY10'-1" CLG.BAR10'-1" CLG.OUTDOOR LIVING ROOM11'-6" x 25'-0"10'-1" CLG.GARAGE16'-0" x 10'-0"10'-1" CLG.FLEX ROOM/OPT. OFFICE11'-6" x 10'-0"10'-1" CLG.40'-0"90'-0"W/H.5'-6" x 3'-0"FREESTANDINGTUB48" VANITY4'-5"1'-0"HIGH WDW.HIGH WDW.6"1'-512"512"SHADOW RIDGE PALM DESERT, CA04-16-20248545TOLL BROTHERSPLAN 1X 2,420 SQ.FT. 0 1610 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"A-05141 142 143 144 5'-0"40'-0"5 0 ' - 0 "5'-0"18'-0"9'-0"25'-0"15'-0"67'-0"DW4'-0" x 9'-0"48" VANITY5'-6" x 3'-0"FREESTANDINGTUB48"X72"SHOWEROPT. DR.PRIMARYBATH12'-1" CLG.2880PRIMARYBEDROOM16'-8" x 14'-0"12'-1" CLG.PRIMARYCLOSET19' L.F.10'-1" CLG.OPT. WET BAR 2880W/H.LAUNDRYROOM6'-7" x 5'-6"10'-1" CLG.16080 GARAGE DOOR OPT. SUNVAULT ESSOPT. HUB2'-0"2'-0"GARAGE20'-0" x 20'-0"10'-1" CLG.POOL (10'-0" x 20'-0")PANTRY10'-1" CLG.BEDROOM 211'-2" x 12'-8"12'-1" CLG.BEDROOM 311'-0" x 13'-0"10'-1" CLG.36" VANITYCOAT 36" VANITYBEDROOM 3 CLOSETBEDROOM 3BATH10'-1" CLG.48" COOKTOP2880OPT. 9080 SL.DR.9080 SL.DR.OUTDOOR LIVING ROOM11'-6" x 13'-8"10'-1" CLG.OPT. 48" FIREPLACEFOYER12'-1" CLG.EVERYDAYENTRY10'-1" CLG.POWDERROOM10'-1" CLG.OVEN/MICRO48" REF.KITCHEN12'-1" CLG.GREAT ROOM20'-0" x 18'-0"12'-1" CLG.CASUALDINING11'-2" x 10'-6"10'-1" CLG.OPT. UPPERSA/C2880FLEX ROOM/OPT. OFFICE12'-0" x 11'-3"10'-1" CLG.OPT. BARN DR.36" VANITYBEDROOM 2 CLOSETOPT.SHOWEROPT.SHOWERBEDROOM 212'-8" x 11'-2"10'-1" CLG.10'-1" CLG.40 8 01 1 0 ' - 0 "48" VANITY4'-7"1'-0"HIGH WDW.HIGH WDW.OPT. 48" FIREPLACE1'-512"6"6"16080 GARAGE DOORPORCH10'-1" CLG.1'-0"1'-512"SHADOW RIDGE PALM DESERT, CA04-16-20248545TOLL BROTHERSPLAN 2 2,328 SQ.FT. (TARGETED FOOTAGE: 2,300 SQ.FT) 0 1610 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"REFLECTSCONTEMPORARYREFLECTSINTERNATIONALA-09145 2880OPT. 48" FIREPLACEOUTDOOR LIVING ROOM10'-0" x 25'-0"10'-1" CLG.40 8 0 9080 GARAGE DOORGOLF CARTGARAGE13'-0" x 12'-8"10'-1" CLG.OFFICE12'-0" x 11'-3"10'-1" CLG.288048" FIREPLACE9080 SL. DR.48" FIREPLACE11'-0" x 13'-8"10'-1" CLG.OPT. 9080 SL.DR.1'-0"CASUALDINING11'-2" x 10'-6"10'-1" CLG.SHADOW RIDGE PALM DESERT, CA04-16-20248545TOLL BROTHERSPLAN 2 OPTIONS 0 1610 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"OPTION XXXXXX - EXTENDED OUTDOORLIVING ROOMOPTION XXXXXX - GOLF CART GARAGEOPTION XXXXXX - 9080 SL. DR.AT GREAT ROOMOPTION FIRD0007 - EXTERIOR FIREPLACE - 48" LANAI OUTDOOR LIVING ROOMOPTION FIRX0016 - 48" FIREPLACE - PRIMOAT GREAT ROOMOPTION FLPE0011 - OFFICEREPLACES FLEX ROOMA-10146 DW4'-0" x 9'-0"48" VANITY5'-6" x 3'-0"FREESTANDINGTUB48"X72"SHOWER48" VANITYOPT. DR.PRIMARYBATH12'-1" CLG.2880PRIMARYBEDROOM16'-0" x 14'-0"12'-1" CLG.PRIMARYCLOSET24' L.F.10'-1" CLG.OPT. WET BAR 2880W/H.LAUNDRYROOM5'-6" x 6'-7"10'-1" CLG.16080 GARAGE DOOR OPT. SUNVAULT ESSOPT. HUB2'-0"2'-0"GARAGE20'-0" x 20'-0"10'-1" CLG.PANTRY10'-1" CLG.BEDROOM 211'-2" x 12'-8"12'-1" CLG.BEDROOM 311'-0" x 13'-0"10'-1" CLG.36" VANITY 36" VANITYBEDROOM 3 CLOSETBEDROOM 3BATH10'-1" CLG.48" COOKTOP2880OPT. 9080 SL.DR.9080 SL.DR.OPT. 48" FIREPLACEOUTDOOR LIVING ROOM11'-6" x 13'-8"10'-1" CLG.OPT. 48" FIREPLACEFOYER12'-1" CLG.EVERYDAYENTRY10'-1" CLG.POWDERROOM10'-1" CLG.KITCHEN12'-1" CLG.GREAT ROOM20'-0" x 18'-0"12'-1" CLG.A/C2880MEDIA11'-0" x 13'-9"10'-1" CLG.OPT. BARN DR.36" VANITYBEDROOM 2 CLOSETOPT.SHOWEROPT. SHOWER BEDROOM 212'-8" x 11'-2"10'-1" CLG.10'-1" CLG.40 8 0FLEX ROOM/OPT. OFFICE12'-0" x 13'-2"10'-1" CLG.BAR10'-1" CLG.GARAGE16'-0" x 10'-0"10'-1" CLG.40'-0"101'-0"COATOVEN/MICRO48" REF.4'-7"1'-0"CASUALDINING11'-2" x 10'-6"10'-1" CLG.HIGH WDW.HIGH WDW.6"6"1'-512"SHADOW RIDGE PALM DESERT, CA04-16-20248545TOLL BROTHERSPLAN 2X 0 1610 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 2,759 SQ.FT.A-11147 148 149 150 5'-6" x 3'-0"FREESTANDINGTUBOPT. HUBOPT. SUNVAULT ESS2880OPT. 48" FIREPLACEOVEN/MICRO48" REF.2'-0"2'-0"2880DW9080 SL.DR.GARAGE20'-0" x 20'-0"10'-1" CLG.PRIMARYBATH12'-1" CLG.BEDROOM 211'-6" x 12'-3"12'-1" CLG.BEDROOM 2 CLOSETEVERYDAYENTRY10'-1" CLG.PRIMARYBEDROOM16'-0" x 14'-0"12'-1" CLG.PANTRY10'-1" CLG.KITCHEN12'-1" CLG.CASUALDINING12'-1" CLG. GREAT ROOM18'-9" x 28'-7"12'-1" CLG.OUTDOOR LIVING ROOM12'-0" x 14'-6"10'-1" CLG.60"X126"SHOWERPRIMARYCLOSET20' L.F.10'-1" CLG.48" COOKTOPO P T . D R .4'-0" x 9'-0"A/C90" VANITYLINEN HIGH WNDWSTORAGE10'-1" CLG.36" VANITY FOYER12'-1" CLG.LAUNDRYROOM6'-5" x 6'-0"10'-1" CLG.COAT10'-1" CLG.36" VANITYBEDROOM 2BATH10'-1" CLG.OPT. OFFICE/11'-0" x 12'-9"10'-1" CLG.FLEX ROOM/BEDROOM 3BATH10'-1" CLG.36" VANITYBEDROOM 311'-6" x 12'-5"10'-1" CLG.BEDROOM 3 CLOSET POWDERROOM10'-1" CLG.2880288016080 GARAGE DOOROPT.SHOWEROPT.SHOWEROPT. BARN DR.OPT. 48" FIREPLACE10'-1" CLG.40 8 0 5'-0"40'-0"5 0 ' - 0 "70'-0"5'-0"18'-0"9'-0"10'-0"POOL (10'-0" x 20'-0")12'-0"W/H.1 1 0 ' - 0 "10'-9"1'-0"HIGH WDW.HIGH WDW.HIGH WNDW1'-512"512"22'-0"PORCH10'-1" CLG.16080 GARAGE DOOR 1'-0"1'-512"SHADOW RIDGE PALM DESERT, CA04-16-20248545TOLL BROTHERSPLAN 3 2,425 SQ.FT. (TARGETED FOOTAGE: 2,400 SQ.FT) 0 1610 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"REFLECTSCONTEMPORARYREFLECTSINTERNATIONALA-15151 9080 SL.DR.OUTDOOR LIVING ROOM12'-0" x 38'-0"10'-1" CLG.A/COPT. 48" FIREPLACE40 8 0 9080 GARAGE DOORGOLF CARTGARAGE13'-0" x 12'-8"10'-1" CLG.48" FIREPLACE48" FIREPLACEOFFICE11'-0" x 12'-5"10'-1" CLG.1'-0"SHADOW RIDGE PALM DESERT, CA04-16-20248545TOLL BROTHERSPLAN 3 OPTIONS 0 1610 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"OPTION XXXXXX - GOLF CART GARAGEOPTION XXXXXX - EXTENDED OUTDOORLIVING ROOMOPTION FLPE0011 - OFFICEREPLACES FLEX ROOMOPTION FIRX0016 - 48" FIREPLACE - PRIMOAT GREAT ROOMOPTION FIRD0007 - EXTERIOR FIREPLACE - 48" LANAI OUTDOOR LIVING ROOMA-16152 OPT. HUBOPT. SUNVAULT ESS2 8 8 0 2'-0"2'-0"2880DW9080 SL.DR.GARAGE36'-0" x 20'-0"10'-1" CLG.PRIMARYBATH12'-1" CLG.BEDROOM 211'-6" x 12'-3"12'-1" CLG.BEDROOM 2 CLOSETEVERYDAYENTRY10'-1" CLG.PRIMARYBEDROOM16'-0" x 14'-0"12'-1" CLG.PANTRY10'-1" CLG.KITCHEN12'-1" CLG.OUTDOOR LIVING ROOM12'-0" x 14'-6"10'-1" CLG.W/H.PRIMARYCLOSET20' L.F.10'-1" CLG.O P T . D R . 90" VANITYLINEN10'-1" CLG.36" VANITY FOYER12'-1" CLG.LAUNDRYROOM8'-9" x 6'-0"10'-1" CLG.COAT10'-1" CLG.36" VANITYBEDROOM 2BATH10'-1" CLG.OPT. OFFICE/11'-0" x 12'-9"10'-1" CLG.FLEX ROOM/BEDROOM 3BATH10'-1" CLG.36" VANITYBEDROOM 311'-6" x 12'-5"10'-1" CLG.BEDROOM 3 CLOSETPOWDERROOM10'-1" CLG.288016080 GARAGE DOOROPT.SHOWEROPT. BARN DR.10'-1" CLG.40 8 0 107'-0"40'-0"GAME ROOM15'-9" x 12'-9"10'-1" CLG.OPT. 48" FIREPLACEA/COPT. 48" FIREPLACECASUALDINING12'-1" CLG. GREAT ROOM18'-9" x 28'-7"12'-1" CLG.48" COOKTOP4'-0" x 9'-0"OVEN/MICRO48" REF.STORAGE28805'-6" x 3'-0"FREESTANDINGTUB60"X126"SHOWEROPT.SHOWER10'-9"1'-0"HIGH WDW.HIGH WDW.HIGH WNDWHIGH WNDW1'-512"512"SHADOW RIDGE PALM DESERT, CA04-16-20248545TOLL BROTHERSPLAN 3X 2,737 SQ. FT. 0 1610 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"A-17153 154 155 156 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE EXHIBITSLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PLANNING RESEARCH23011 Moulton Parkway (949) 855-6413 Suite H2 Laguna Hills, CA 92653STAN SMITH ASSOCIATES FAX 830-4465 L1.0 Cover Sheet Date: 6/10/24 L1.0: COVER SHEET L1.1: PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE - ENTRY & OPEN SPACE L1.2: PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE - STREET & ALLEY L2.1 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE MATERIALS L2.2: PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE MATERIALS L3.1: PRELIMINARY FENCE & WALL L4.1: PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE - FRONT YARD TYPICALS L4.2: PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE - FRONT YARD TYPICAL- GOLF CART GARAGE OPTION SHADOW RIDGE VTTM 38866, Palm Desert, CA L5.1: MASTER IRRIGATION METER & SLEEVING L4.3: PRELIMINARY FRONT YARD LANDSCAPE MATERIALS L3.2: PRELIMINARY FENCE & WALL 157 38 1 11 12 13 14 36 37 39 40 41 93 SHADOW RIDGE VTTM 38866, Palm Desert, CA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PLANNING RESEARCH23011 Moulton Parkway (949) 855-6413 Suite H2 Laguna Hills, CA 92653STAN SMITH ASSOCIATES FAX 830-4465 Preliminary Landscape Entry & Open Space L1.1NORTH SCALE: 1" = 30' 0'SHADOW RIDGE ROAD30'15'30'60' ENTRY ELEVATION scale: 1" = 10' ENTRY MONUMENT scale: 1" = 10' TURF SHA D O W R I D G E R O A D Date: 6/10/24 158 ' ' '' ' '' '' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' 4 5 6 7 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 SHADOW RIDGE VTTM 38866, Palm Desert, CA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PLANNING RESEARCH23011 Moulton Parkway (949) 855-6413 Suite H2 Laguna Hills, CA 92653STAN SMITH ASSOCIATES FAX 830-4465 Preliminary Landscape Street & Alley L1.2NORTH SCALE: 1" = 20' 0'20'10'20'40' B A SECTION A-A: Street Section SECTION B-B: Alley Section scale: 1"=10' scale: 1"=10' A B Date: 6/10/24 B B B 159 SHADOW RIDGE VTTM 38866, Palm Desert, CA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PLANNING RESEARCH23011 Moulton Parkway (949) 855-6413 Suite H2 Laguna Hills, CA 92653STAN SMITH ASSOCIATES FAX 830-4465 L2.1 Preliminary Landscape Materials Fraxinus velutina - Arizona Ash Olneya tesota - Desert Ironwood Pinus elderica - Afghan Pine Pistacia chinensis - Chinese Pistache Prosopis glandulosa - Thornless Honey Mesquite Atriplex lentiformis - Quail Bush Bougainvillea sp. Caesalpinia pulcherrima - Red Bird of Paradise Calliandra califonica - Fairy Duster Cistus purpureus - Orchid Rockrose Dalea f. 'Sierra Negra' - Black Dalea Dalea puochra - Indigo Bush Encelia farinosa - Brittlebush Fallugia paradoza - Apache Plume Larrea tridentata - Creosote Bush Leucophyllum c. 'Thunder Cloud' - SIlverleaf Leucophyllum frutescens - Texas Ranger Leucophyllum l. 'RioBravo' - Rio Bravo Sage Leucophyllum z. 'Cimarron' - Blue Ranger Salvia clevelandii - Cleveland Sage Senna artemesiodes - Feathery Cassia Chrysactinia mexicana - Damianita Daisy Lantana 'New Gold' - Lantana Salvia chamaedryoides - Mexican Blue Sage Abronia villosa - Sand Verbena Date: 6/10/24 160 SHADOW RIDGE VTTM 38866, Palm Desert, CA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PLANNING RESEARCH23011 Moulton Parkway (949) 855-6413 Suite H2 Laguna Hills, CA 92653STAN SMITH ASSOCIATES FAX 830-4465 L2.2 Preliminary Landscape Materials Melampodium leucanthum - Blackfoot Daisy Agave americana - Centruy Plant Fouquieria splendens - Ocotillo Phoenix dactylifera - Date Palm Butia capitata - Pindo Palm Cereus hildmannianus - Hildman's Cereus Opuntia basilaris - Beavertail Cactus Stabilized Decomposed Granite - Palm Springs Gold and Apache Brown - coarseness: fine gravel/coarse sand Crushed Rock - California Gold - coarseness: 3/4" size Landscape Boulders - Apache Sunset and Desert SelectCalamagrostis 'Karl Foerster' - Feather Reed Grass Nassella tenuissima - Mexican Feather Grass Apache Brown - coarseness: 3/4" size Desert Spice - 1"-5" size Date: 6/10/24 161 5053515254555657605859636162646566696768717072737475767778798081828384'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''NORTH SCALE: 1" = 40' 0'SHADOW RIDGE VTTM 38866, Palm Desert, CA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PLANNING RESEARCH23011 Moulton Parkway (949) 855-6413 Suite H2 Laguna Hills, CA 92653STAN SMITH ASSOCIATES FAX 830-4465 Preliminary Fence & Wall L3.1 40'20'40'80' SH A D O W R I D G E R O A D DATE: 6/10/24 WALL NOTES: -ALL STUCCO IS TO MATCH MARRIOTT WALLS -ALL STONE VENEER IS TO MATCH MARRIOTT STONE -ALL PRECAST CAPS ARE TO BE NATURAL COLOR -ALL STUCCO IS TO BE SAND FINISH ' ] 162 381234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363739444041424346454748504987848586889189909293]]''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''NORTH SCALE: 1" = 40' 0'SHADOW RIDGE VTTM 38866, Palm Desert, CA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PLANNING RESEARCH23011 Moulton Parkway (949) 855-6413 Suite H2 Laguna Hills, CA 92653STAN SMITH ASSOCIATES FAX 830-4465 Preliminary Fence & Wall L3.2 40'20'40'80' SH A D O W R I D G E R O A D DATE: 6/10/24 ' ] 163 SHADOW RIDGE VTTM 38866, Palm Desert, CA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PLANNING RESEARCH23011 Moulton Parkway (949) 855-6413 Suite H2 Laguna Hills, CA 92653STAN SMITH ASSOCIATES FAX 830-4465 Preliminary Landscape Front Yard Typical L4.1 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 0'4'8'8'16' PLAN 1 PLAN 2R PLAN 3 Date: 6/10/24 164 SHADOW RIDGE VTTM 38866, Palm Desert, CA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PLANNING RESEARCH23011 Moulton Parkway (949) 855-6413 Suite H2 Laguna Hills, CA 92653STAN SMITH ASSOCIATES FAX 830-4465 Preliminary Landscape Front Yard Typical L4.2 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 0'4'8'8'16' PLAN 1 PLAN 2R PLAN 3 Date: 6/10/24 WITH GOLF CART GARAGE WITH GOLF CART GARAGE WITH GOLF CART GARAGE Golf Cart Garage Option 165 SHADOW RIDGE VTTM 38866, Palm Desert, CA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PLANNING RESEARCH23011 Moulton Parkway (949) 855-6413 Suite H2 Laguna Hills, CA 92653STAN SMITH ASSOCIATES FAX 830-4465 L4.3 PreliminaryFront Yard Landscape Materials Chilopsis linearis - Desert Willow Olea sp. - Fruitless Olive Parkinsonia 'AZT' - Thornless palo Verde Stabilized Decomposed Granite - Palm Springs Gold and Apache Brown Crushed Rock (3/4" size) - California Gold Apache Brown Callianda californica - Fairy Duster Fouquieria splendens - Ocotillo Encelia farinosa - Brittlebush Opuntia c. 'Ellisiana' - Elisiana Prickly Pear Agave 'Blue Flame' - Blue Flame Agave Aloe striata - Coral Aloe Chysactinia mexicana - Damiantia Daisy Rosmarinus o. 'Boule' - Rosemary Cordia parviflora - Little-leaf Cordia Muhlenbergia c. 'Regal Mist' - Pink Muhly Lavandula angustifolia - English Lavender Convolvulus cneorum - Bush Morning Glory Penstemon eatonii - Firecracker Penstemon Dalea c. 'Sierra Gold' - DaleaHesperaloe parviflora - Red Yucca Date: 6/10/24 166 38 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 39 40 41 40'20'40'80'SHADOW RIDGE VTTM 38866, Palm Desert, CA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PLANNING RESEARCH23011 Moulton Parkway (949) 855-6413 Suite H2 Laguna Hills, CA 92653STAN SMITH ASSOCIATES FAX 830-4465 Master Irrigation Meter & Sleeving L5.1NORTH SCALE: 1" = 40' 0' Date: 6/10/24 167 168 Notice of Exemption FORM “B” NOTICE OF EXEMPTION TO: Office of Planning and Research P. O. Box 3044, Room 113 Sacramento, CA 95812-3044 FROM: City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 Clerk of the Board of Supervisors or County Clerk County of: Riverside 2724 Gateway Dr, Riverside, CA 92507 1. Project Title: VTTM 28866 (TTM23-0005) / PP23-0023 2. Project Applicant: Toll Brothers 3. Project Location – Identify street address and cross streets or attach a map showing project site (preferably a USGS 15’ or 7 1/2’ topographical map identified by quadrangle name): 9003 Shadow Ridge Road / Assessor Parcel Numbers 694-290-010, -011, 694-320-010, and -011 4. (a) Project Location – City: Palm Desert (b) Project Location – County: Riverside 5. Description of nature, purpose, and beneficiaries of Project: Vesting Tentative Tract Map (VTTM) and Precise Plan (PP) to facilitate the development of a 93-lot single- family residential subdivision of a vacant 20.69-acre site within the existing Marriott Shadow Ridge Development 6. Name of Public Agency approving project: City of Palm Desert 7. Name of Person or Agency undertaking the project, including any person undertaking an activity that receives financial assistance from the Public Agency as part of the activity or the person receiving a lease, permit, license, certificate, or other entitlement of use from the Public Agency as part of the activity: Toll Brothers 8. Exempt status: (check one) (a) Ministerial project. (Pub. Res. Code § 21080(b)(1); State CEQA Guidelines § 15268) (b) Not a project. (c) Emergency Project. (Pub. Res. Code § 21080(b)(4); State CEQA Guidelines § 15269(b),(c)) (d) Categorical Exemption. State type and section number: State CEQA Guidelines §15332 – Class 32 In-fill project (e) Declared Emergency. (Pub. Res. Code § 21080(b)(3); State CEQA Guidelines § 15269(a)) (f) Statutory Exemption. State Code section number: (g) Other. Explanation: Projects Consistent with Community Plan, General Plan, or Zoning - State CEQA Guidelines § 15183 169 Notice of Exemption FORM “B” 9. Reason why project was exempt: CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 allows for a streamlined environmental review process for projects, which are consistent with the development density established by existing zoning, community plan, or general plan policies for which an EIR was certified, except as might be necessary to examine whether there are project- specific significant effects, which are peculiar to the project or its sites. If the above qualifications are met, as stated in Section 15183(b), “a public agency shall limit its examination of environmental effects to those which the agency determines, in an initial study or other analysis: (1) are peculiar to the project or the parcel on which the project would be located, (2) were not analyzed as significant effects in a prior EIR on the zoning action, general plan, or community plan, with which the project is consistent, (3) are potentially significant off-site impacts and cumulative impacts which were not discussed in the prior EIR prepared for the general plan, community plan or zoning action, or the Project’s CEQA Section 15183 Analysis (4) are previously identified significant effects which, as a result of substantial new information which was not known at the time the EIR was certified, are determined to have a more severe adverse impact than discussed in the prior EIR.” An analysis of the project was prepared to satisfy the requirements of CEQA Guidelines Section 15183. It analyzes the potential environmental effects of the proposed project and evaluates whether they were adequately analyzed in a prior EIR such that the above-identified streamlining criteria apply. The project is consistent with the Palm Desert General Plan Update (General Plan Update), for which an EIR (SCH # 2015081020) was certified. The General Plan Update provides a framework for future growth of the City and projects the development reasonably expected to occur during the buildout period. The Genal Plan Update EIR analyzed the environmental impacts associated with the adoption and implementation of the General Plan Update. The proposed project is permitted in the zoning district where the project site is located and consistent with the land uses, density, and vision of the General Plan Update. The evaluation determined that either no impact or less than significant impacts would be associated with the proposed project. The proposed subdivision project is being undertaken in conformity with the approved 2016 General Plan Resort and Entertainment land use designation. The proposed project will be consistent with applicable zoning development standards and the General Plan. There are no substantial changes in the project from those analyzed in the 2016 General Plan EIR. 10. Lead Agency Contact Person: Nick Melloni, Principal Planner Telephone: (760) 346-0611 11. If filed by applicant: Attach Preliminary Exemption Assessment (Form “A”) before filing. 12. Has a Notice of Exemption been filed by the public agency approving the project? ⁭ Yes ⁭ No 13. Was a public hearing held by the lead agency to consider the exemption? ⁭ Yes ⁭ No If yes, the date of the public hearing was: June 18, 2024 Signature: Date: June 18, 2024 Title: Principal Planner ⁭ Signed by Lead Agency ⁭ Signed by Applicant Date Received for Filing: (Clerk Stamp Here) 170 Notice of Exemption FORM “B” Authority cited: Sections 21083 and 21100, Public Resources Code. Reference: Sections 21108, 21152, and 21152.1, Public Resources Code. 171 172 CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15183 ANALYSIS FOR THE SHADOW RIDGE PROJECT IN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, PRECISE PLAN 23-0023 AND VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 38866 Prepared for: City of Palm Desert 73510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, California 92260 Prepared by: Tom Dodson & Associates P.O. Box 2307 San Bernardino, CA 92406 (909) 882-3612 In association with Buchalter, A Professional Corporation JUNE 2024 173 City of Palm Desert Shadow Ridge Project, PP 23-0023/VTTM 38866 SECTION 15183 ANALYSIS TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES Page ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction......................................................................................................................................... 1 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected ....................................................................................... 8 Determination ..................................................................................................................................... 9 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts I. Aesthetics .......................................................................................................................... 10 II. Agricultural and Forestry Resources ................................................................................. 12 III. Air Quality .......................................................................................................................... 14 IV. Biological Resources ......................................................................................................... 22 V. Cultural Resources ............................................................................................................ 26 VI. Energy ................................................................................................................................ 29 VII. Geology and Soils .............................................................................................................. 32 VIII. Greenhouse Gas Emissions .............................................................................................. 35 IX. Hazards and Hazardous Materials .................................................................................... 39 X. Hydrology and Water Quality ............................................................................................. 42 XI. Land Use and Planning ..................................................................................................... 46 XII. Mineral Resources ............................................................................................................. 47 XIII. Noise .................................................................................................................................. 48 XIV. Population and Housing ..................................................................................................... 52 XV. Public Services .................................................................................................................. 53 XVI. Recreation .......................................................................................................................... 55 XVII. Transportation .................................................................................................................... 56 XVIII. Tribal Cultural Resources .................................................................................................. 58 XIX. Utilities and Service Systems ............................................................................................ 59 XX. Wildfire ............................................................................................................................... 61 XXI. Mandatory Findings of Significance ................................................................................... 63 References ......................................................................................................................................... 65 APPENDICES Appendix 1 – Air Quality / GHG / Energy Assessment Appendix 2 – BRA / JD / CVMSHCP Consistency Analysis Appendix 3 – Cultural Resources Assessment Appendix 4 – Geotechnical Investigation Appendix 5 – Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Appendix 6 – Water Quality Management Plan Appendix 7 – Trip Generation Assessment Appendix 8 – Vehicle Miles Traveled Screening Evaluation 174 City of Palm Desert Shadow Ridge Project, PP 23-0023/VTTM 38866 SECTION 15183 ANALYSIS TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES Page iii FIGURES Figure 1 Regional Location Map Figure 2 Site Location Map (USGS) Figure 3 Site Location Map (Aerial) Figure 4 Conceptual Site Plan Figure 5 Proposed Layout Figure IX-1 GeoTracker Figure X-1 City General Plan Flood Hazard Overlay Figure XII-1 Mineral Resource Zone Figure XIII-1 Existing Noise Contours Figure XIII-2 Future Noise Contours Figure XIX-1 Water and Sewer Lines Figure XX-1 Fire Hazard Severity Zones TABLES Table III-1 Maximum Daily Regional Emissions Thresholds .............................................. 15 Table III-2 Overall Regional Construction Emissions Summary ......................................... 18 Table III-3 Total Project Regional Operational Emissions .................................................. 18 Table III-4 Project Localized Construction Impacts ............................................................ 20 Table VIII-1 Total Project Greenhouse Gas Emissions ........................................................ 37 Table XIII-1 Noise Levels of Construction Equipment at 25, 50 and 100 Feet From the Source ............................................................................................. 50 175 City of Palm Desert Shadow Ridge Project, PP 23-0023/VTTM 38866 SECTION 15183 ANALYSIS TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES Page iv LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACROYNMS AAQS Ambient Air Quality Standards AB Assembly Bill ACBCI Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians APE Area of Potential Effect AQMP Air Quality Management Plan BACMs Best Available Control Measures BMPs Best Management Practices BRA Biological Resources Assessment BUOW burrowing owl CAA Clean Air Act CAAA Clean Air Act Amendment CAAQS California Ambient Air Quality Standards CalEEMod California Emissions Estimator Model CARB California Air Resources Board CBC California Building Code CCAR California Climate Action Registry (now called Climate Action Reserve) CDFW California Department of Fish and Wildlife CEQA California Environmental Quality Act CFD Community Facilities District CMP Congestion Management Program CNDDB California Natural Diversity Data Base CNEL Community Noise Equivalent Level CRECs controlled recognized environmental conditions CVMSHCP Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan CVWD Coachella Valley Water District CWA Clean Water Act dB decibel dBA A-weighted decibel DIF Development Impact Fees DTSC Department of Toxic Substances Control EIC Eastern Information Center EIR Environmental Impact Report ESA Environmental Site Assessment FGC Fish & Game Code FTA Federal Transit Association GCC Global Climate Change GHG Greenhouse Gas IS/MND Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration JE Jennings Environmental LOS Level of Service LST Localized Significance Thresholds LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tank 176 City of Palm Desert Shadow Ridge Project, PP 23-0023/VTTM 38866 SECTION 15183 ANALYSIS TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES Page v MBTA Migratory Bird Treaty Act MCEg maximum considered earthquake geometric mean MM Mitigation Measure MMRP Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan MPO Metropolitan Planning Organization MRZ Mineral Resources Zone MWD Metropolitan Water District of Southern California NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standards NAHC Native American Heritage Commission NHPA National Historic Preservation Act NOI Notice of Intent NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NRCS Natural Resources Conservation Services PGA peak ground acceleration PP Precise Plan PR Planned Residential RECs recognized environmental conditions ROW Right-of-Way RTP/SCS Regional Transportation Plan / Sustainable Communities Strategies RWQCB Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAB South Coast Air Basin SCAG Southern California Association of Governments SCAQMD South Coast Air Quality Management District SCE Southern California Edison SLF Sacred Lands File SCH State Clearinghouse SDG significant data aps SIP State Implementation Plan SSAB Salton Sea Air Basin SWPPP Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan SWRCB State Water Resources Control Board TTM Tentative Tract Map USACE U.S. Army Corps of Engineers USFWS U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service USGS U.S. Geological Survey VMT Vehicle Miles Traveled VOC volatile organic compounds VTTM Vesting Tentative Tract Map WoUS Waters of the United States WQMP Water Quality Management Plan 177 City of Palm Desert Shadow Ridge Project, PP 23-0023/VTTM 38866 SECTION 15183 ANALYSIS TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES Page 1 CITY OF PALM DESERT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INTRODUCTION 1. Project Title: Shadow Ridge Project, Precise Plan (PP) 23-0023 and Vesting Tentative Tract Map (VTTM) 38866 2. Lead Agency Name: City of Palm Desert Address: 73510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 3. Contact Person: Mr. Nick Melloni, Principal Planner Phone Number: 760-776-6479 E-mail: nmelloni@palmdesert.gov 4. Project Location: In 1998 the City of Palm Desert approved Marriott Corporation’s proposal to develop the Marriott Shadow Ridge Resort. The City of Palm Desert approved entitlements, including a development agreement, to construct a golf resort an 18-hole golf course (Marriott Shadow Ridge), and up to 999 timeshare units. The Marriott Shadow Ridge Resort occupies a 306-acre site located at the southeast corner of Monterey Avenue and Gerald Ford Drive. Toll Brothers is proposing to acquire approximately 20.69 acres of the 309-acre Marriott Shadow Ridge property (project site) to develop a residential neighborhood adjacent to the Shadow Ridge Resort to develop a golf course/resort residential neighborhood. The 20.69-acre project site was approved for up to 324 timeshare units that will now not be constructed. The project is located in Section 32, T4S, R6E, SBB&M on the Cathedral City 7.5' USGS Topographic map, at Latitude 33° 46' 45" N and Longitude 116° 22' 52.26" W. Figures 1 and 2 illustrate the regional and site location, and Figure 3 is a recent aerial photograph of the site. 5. Project Sponsor’s Toll Brothers Name and Address: 350 Commerce, Suite 200 Irvine, CA 92602 6. General Plan Designation: Resort and Entertainment District 1 7. Zoning Classification: Planned Residential – 5 dwellings per acre (PR-5) 8. Project Description: Shadow Ridge Project, Precise Plan (PP) 23-0023 and Vesting Tentative Tract Map (VTTM) 38866 1 The Development Agreement vests the General Plan land use designation as Low Density Residential. 178 City of Palm Desert Shadow Ridge Project, PP 23-0023/VTTM 38866 SECTION 15183 ANALYSIS TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES Page 2 The proposed project would involve the development of up to 93 single-family detached resort-oriented residences on an approximately 20.69-acre project site within a portion of the existing Marriott Shadow Ridge development within the City of Palm Desert. Implementation of the proposed project would require the City to approve: 1) a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) amendment 2) a Vesting Tentative Tract Map (VTTM) and 3) a Precise Plan (PP). The proposed project for residential development is located on the northeast side of Marriott’s 306-acre Shadow Ridge property on Designated Remainder Parcel Nos. 4, 5, and a portion of Lot D of Tract 28818-1. Refer to Figure 4. In lieu of constructing 324 time-share units, Toll Brothers proposes to develop the 93 single-family detached resort-oriented residences on the project site as shown on Figure 4, the Conceptual Site Plan for the proposed project. The lots vary in size, but are a minimum of 50’ x 110’, or a 5,500 square foot (sf) lots. Toll Brothers envisions the development to include three one-story residential building plans, of 31 units each: • Plan 1 with 3 bedrooms, 3.5 bath rooms, with 2,216 sf • Plan 2 with 3 bedrooms, 3.5 bath rooms, with 2,322 sf • Plan 2 with 3 bedrooms, 3.5 bath rooms, with 2,425 sf Figure 5 shows the proposed layout of these units on the individual lots that would be created if the City approves this PRC section 21083.3/CEQA Guidelines section 15183 analysis and Precise Plan (PP) 23- 0023 and Vesting Tentative Tract Map (VTTM) 38866. Primary access to the project site will be from Shadow Ridge Road off of Monterey Avenue, with secondary access from Shadow Ridge Road off of Gerald Ford Drive. This development will be a gated community, as is the case with the existing Shadow Ridge time share facilities. Gates will be installed at both the north and west entrances to the development. All construction traffic will use Gerald Ford Drive to access the project site. The following text summarizes the actions that will be necessary to develop the 93 single-family residential units included in the Project. • The project site will be mass graded to create the pad on which the residential subdivision will be constructed. Based on preliminary calculations, the project will require an estimated 15,000 cubic yards (CY) of fill to balance grading at the project site. • Prior to initiating mass grading, Toll Brothers will remove the existing storage facilities located at the north end of the property, as shown on Figure 4. These facilities will be demolished prior to initiating site grading. • Within the subdivision Shadow Ridge Road will initially be paved with a width of 33 feet and it will transition to a 41-foot right-of-way (ROW) to facilitate two entrance lanes with the subdivision. Within the subdivision, Shadow Ridge Road will be a private road. The road sections are illustrated on Figure 4. • A new sidewalk will be installed from the intersection of Shadow Ridge Road -north and Shadow Ridge Road-west, west to the access road into Marriott’s Shadow Ridge Golf Club. The sidewalk will be on the north side of the road only, as shown on Figure 4. • The storm drain lines will be installed onsite and directed towards two underground basins. From each basin, an emergency overflow will discharge into the golf course. • Two open space lots will be installed at the intersection of Shadow Ridge Road -north and Shadow Ridge Road-west. They will serve as open space and as bioretention basins to support the Water Quality Management Plan. The underground storage by the Shadow Ridge Road entrance is approximately 48,200 cubic feet, and the underground storage to the north, by lot 64, is estimated to encompass about 11,010 cubic feet. • The proposed project will connect to the existing potable water connections at both the north and south ends of the subdivision. • The wastewater (sewer) connection will be located at the SE corner of the property. • A natural gas line exists in Gerald Ford and will be connected to the residences. • The project will connect to SCE’s electricity distribution system, and the local distribution system will be undergrounded. 179 City of Palm Desert Shadow Ridge Project, PP 23-0023/VTTM 38866 SECTION 15183 ANALYSIS TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES Page 3 Entitlements • Amendment to remove the Project Site from the site’s existing Conditional Use Permit (CUP – Case No. PP/CUP98-5) • A Vesting Tentative Tract Map, VTTM 38866; and • A Precise Plan (PP) PP23-0023 for the Site Plan and Architecture of the proposed homes A Community Facilities District (CFD) and Homeowners Association (HOA) will be established for the project. This analysis provides the necessary information required to analyze the Project’s consistency with the City’s General Plan in accordance with PRC section 21083.3 and Section 15183 of the State CEQA Guidelines. Construction Sequence The anticipated construction sequence is as follows, but may be adjusted to conform to specific conditions at the time of actual construction: 1. Clear and grub; 2. Demolition of existing onsite structures; 3. Preparation of subgrade; 4. Mass-grade site and road beds; 5. Installation of the storm drain systems; 6. Installation of public sewer systems; 7. Installation of public water systems; 8. Installation of private utilities, including water quality infrastructure; 9. Fine grade to prepare for surface improvements; 10. Installation of building foundations; 11. Install curb, gutters, sidewalks and first asphalt lift; 12. Complete construction of buildings; 13. Install landscaping; place final lift of asphalt; and 14. Install roadway signage and striping. The buildings will be developed with a combination of wood framing, and the exterior will be stucco, similar to surrounding structures. Construction is anticipated completed in two phases with the entirety of the horizontal improvements to be completed first. This will include grading and installation of utilities, and development of internal paved roadways. Grading is anticipated to be initiated late-2024. Following grading, installation of private roadways and all infrastructure would be installed in one phase over the entire site. Residential/building construction is anticipated commence in early fourth quarter 2025. Grading will occur via mechanized grading and compaction equipment including, but not limited to the following: front end loader, excavator, loader backhoe, dump truck, forklift, skid steer, mobile crane, bulldozer, grader, roller, water wagon, asphalt compactors, telehandlers, cement trucks, various hand tools traditional to grading operations, etc. For the areas that require paving, such as the new road segments, the asphalt or concrete will be delivered to the site and applied to these areas utilizing a mix of the mechanized equipment such as pavers, mixers, paving equipment, loaders/backhoes, and rollers. It is anticipated that between 20 and 50 construction workers will be on site at any given time during construction, with construction truck trips requiring a maximum of about 30 miles round-trip based on the location of the project site in the context of regional facilities that provide construction materials or receive excess soils. Additional construction details are provided in the Air Quality Technical Appendix. 9. Surrounding land uses and setting: 180 City of Palm Desert Shadow Ridge Project, PP 23-0023/VTTM 38866 SECTION 15183 ANALYSIS TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES Page 4 As shown on Figure 3, the land uses surrounding the project site consist of a mix of uses. • To the north is the Palm Desert Sheriff’s Station compound and Gerald Ford Drive. North of this road is a mix of residential and commercial uses. • East of the site is more of the Shadow Ridge golf course, open space and then other single-family residential uses. • South of the site is the Shadow Ridge golf course. • West of the project site is the Shadow Ridge golf course that transitions to the existing time share units, and Marriott’s Shadow Ridge Golf Club. 10. Other agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or partici- pation agreement.) With the exception of the NPDES compliance, no additional regulatory permits are anticipated. Based on an evaluation of the specific project location, the proposed project will not require any permits from other regulatory agencies to support development of the site as proposed by the Toll Brothers site development applications. The amount of area to be disturbed by the project will be greater than one acre; therefore, the developer will be required to file a Notice of Intent (NOI) for a General Construction permit to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) requirements. The NOI is filed with the State Water Resources Control Board and enforced by the Colorado River Regional Water Quality Control Board. A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) must be implemented in conjunction with construction activities. No other permits or agency requirements have been identified in association with the proposed project. 11. Have California Native American tribes traditionally and cultural affiliated with the project area requested consultation pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21080.3.1? If so, has consultation begun? Note: Conducting consultation early in the CEQA process allows tribal governments, lead agencies, and project proponents to discuss the level of environmental review, identify and address potential adverse impacts to tribal cultural resources, and reduce the potential for delay and conflict in the environmental review process. (See Public Resources Code section 21083.3.2.) Information may also be available from the California Native American Heritage Commission’s Sacred Lands File per Public Resources Code section 5097.96 and the California Historical Resources Information System administered by the California Office of Historic Preservation. Please also note that Public Resources Code section 21082.3(c) contains provisions specific to confidentiality. Consultation was not required because the City concluded that CEQA compliance can be achieved through review and approval of an Exemption pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15183. As a subsequent project approval for implementing the prior General Plan amendment approval, the Project is not required to evaluate impacts beyond those which were required at the time the General Plan EIR was certified. 12. Project CEQA Review Process Previous Environmental Analyses of the Proposed Project Since 1998, the City of Palm Desert prepared and adopted previous environmental analyses that apply to the Marriott Shadow Ridge Resort property and the proposed project site. On December 10, 1998, the City of Palm Desert City Council approved Marriott’s proposal to develop the Marriott Shadow Ridge Resort on the property. The City of Palm Desert approved entitlements, including a development agreement, to construct a golf resort with an 18-hole golf course (Marriott Shadow Ridge), and up to 999-timeshare units. 181 City of Palm Desert Shadow Ridge Project, PP 23-0023/VTTM 38866 SECTION 15183 ANALYSIS TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES Page 5 At that time, the City of Palm Desert adopted a Negative Declaration and found that the Marriott Shadow Ridge project would not have a significant impact on the environment (Reso. No. 98-108). The Marriott Shadow Ridge development agreement, as amended, vested the development of the Marriott Shadow Ridge resort development through December 2030. Most of the Marriott Shadow Ridge resort has been developed since the City’s approval of the resort in 1998, and the resort exists today. Due to the age of the Marriott Shadow Ridge project Negative Declaration, the City is relying upon the 2016 General Plan Update EIR as the applicable prior program level EIR that covered potential environmental impacts associated with the development of the project site. On November 10, 2016, the City of Palm Desert adopted the City of Palm Desert General Plan Update & University Neighborhood Specific Plan (General Plan Update) and certified the program Environmental Impact Report (General Plan EIR), SCH #2015081020. The General Plan Update included the Marriott Shadow Ridge resort as an existing condition in 2016 EIR and contemplated the buildout of the resort as an approved condition under the adopted General Plan which was vested under the prior development agreement. The General Plan Update focused on key areas of the City, including the Highway 111 corridor/city center and the University Neighborhood Specific Plan and retained many of the other adopted land uses as was the case with the Marriott Shadow Ridge resort. The planning horizon is 25 years and the General Plan Update enabled the City to keep the prior adopted General Plan policies in effect. The General Plan Update was a comprehensive update. The PRC section 21083.3/Section 15183 analysis (identified as the “Section 15183 analysis” in this document) outlines the project’s consistency with the General Plan. The General Plan Update EIR is available for review at the City’s Offices (73-510 Fred Waring Drive). The prior Program General Plan Update EIR confirmed that all environmental impacts resulting from the implementation of the General Plan Update would be less than significant with the imposition of appropriate mitigation, with the exception of Greenhouse Gas and limited Transportation impacts, which were identified as a significant and unavoidable impact. The Program General Plan Update EIR is incorporated into this document in its entirety by this reference. The type and intensity of use proposed as part of the proposed project is consistent with the development anticipated, analyzed, and approved as part of the adopted General Plan Update and evaluated in the General Plan Update EIR. A copy of the General Plan Update EIR is available for review at the Palm Desert City Hall, at 73-510 Fred Waring Drive. The City’s 2016 General Plan EIR analyzed future growth under Chapter 4.13 Population, Employment, and Housing pages 4.13-1 through 4.13-10. Table 4.13-2 (page 4.13-3) forecasts a population of 61,691 by year 2040. In 2016, the City had a population of 52,231 with an average household size of 2.10 persons (U.S. Census Bureau, Quick Facts). The proposed Project would replace 324 timeshare units with 93 single-family detached dwellings and could add 195 people (permanent residents) to the City. On average the City would add about 400 persons per year from 2016 through 2040, and the estimated 195 persons associated with a fully occupied Project represents less than ½ of one year’s forecast population growth through 2040. Project-Specific Environmental Review Section 15183(a) of the CEQA Guidelines states that, “projects that are consistent with the development density established by the existing zoning, community plan or general plan policies for which an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was certified shall not require additional environmental review, except as may be necessary to examine whether there are project-specific significant effects that are peculiar to the project or its site.” The analysis in the following Initial Study/CEQA Checklist provides an assessment of whether the Project qualifies for streamlined review under CEQA Guidelines Section 15183. It evaluates the potential environmental impacts of the Project in relation to the impacts identified in the General Plan Update EIR. The analysis determines whether the potential impacts of the Project were fully evaluated and disclosed in 182 City of Palm Desert Shadow Ridge Project, PP 23-0023/VTTM 38866 SECTION 15183 ANALYSIS TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES Page 6 the prior EIR for the General Plan Update, and whether uniformly applied development policies or standards as identified in the General Plan Update EIR would apply to the Project. It also determines whether the Project would have significant effects on the environment that may be peculiar to the Project or the site. This CEQA Checklist incorporates by reference the discussion and analysis of all potential environmental impact topics as presented in the General Plan Update EIR. This CEQA Checklist provides an analysis in support of a determination of whether the Project would result in: • an equal or less severe impact than previously identified in the Specific Plan EIR, or • new impacts, or a substantial increase in the severity of a significant impact as disclosed in the prior General Plan Update EIR If the severity of a potential impact of the Project would be the same as or less than the severity of the impact as described in the General Plan Update EIR, the checkbox for “Equal or Less Severe” is checked. If the checkbox is marked as “New or Substantial Increase in Severity”, that would indicate that the Project’s impacts are either: • peculiar to the Project or the Project site, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines §15183(b)(1), • not identified in the prior EIR, per CEQA Guidelines §15183(b)(2), including off-site and cumulative impacts, per CEQA Guidelines §15183(b)(3), or • due to substantial new information that was not known at the time the General Plan Update EIR was certified, per CEQA Guidelines §15183(b)(4) In such a circumstance, an MND or a new EIR would be required for the Project, focused on those topics that might be indicated as new or substantially more severe effects. Whereas this document provides substantial evidence that the Project is consistent with the development assumptions of the Specific Plan and the General Plan, the Project is eligible for consideration of CEQA streamlining pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21083.3 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15183. The City of Palm Desert prepared a program-level EIR for the General Plan Update (“General Plan Update EIR”) that applies to the Project and its site, and that Program EIR provides programmatic environmental review of new residential development that is consistent with the General Plan, such as the Project. As noted in the Project Description above, the City of Palm Desert approved the Marriott Shadow Ridge Resort project in June 1998. The City complied with CEQA at that time by preparing and approving a “Subsequent” Initial Study/Negative Declaration that tiered from the North Sphere Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report. Because of lack of availability of original supporting documents and the age of these documents, the City relied on the August 2016 General Plan Update and University Neighborhood Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report (SCH#2015081020, EIR) for the environmental analysis required by section 21083.3/CEQA Guidelines section 15183. The General Plan Update EIR incorporated the Marriott Shadow Ridge Resort project as a project consistent with the updated City General Plan and the General Plan Update EIR therefore provides a cumulative impact evaluation of the City assuming the whole of the 1998 project (18-hole golf course, 999 unit timeshare resort, restaurant, clubhouse, pro shop, golf school, sales center and maintenance facility on the approximate 309 acres) would be developed. The proposed project VTTM 38866 and PP23-0023, envisions a single-family residential resort development of 93 residential units that will replace 324 timeshare units on approximately 20.69 acres of the Resort property. Thus, the analysis presented in this Section 15183 document compares the environmental impact findings of the General Plan Update EIR with the Resort built-out with 324 timeshare units with the specific impacts of developing 93 single-family residences and the infrastructure required to support these units. 183 City of Palm Desert Shadow Ridge Project, PP 23-0023/VTTM 38866 SECTION 15183 ANALYSIS TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES Page 7 Environmental Review Process 1.1 Project Consistent With a Community Plan, General Plan, or Zoning PRC Section 21083.3 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 provides, “projects that are consistent with the development density established by existing zoning, community plan or general plan policies for which an EIR was certified shall not require additional environmental review, except as might be necessary to examine whether there are project-specific significant effects which are peculiar to the project or its site”. These CEQA provisions streamline the environmental review of certain types of projects, and reduce the need to prepare further environmental studies. CEQA Section 21083.3 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 apply to projects that are consistent with a community plan adopted as part of a General Plan, a zoning action which zoned or designated the parcel on which the Project would be located to accommodate a particular density of development, or the General Plan of a local agency. CEQA Guidelines section 15183(i)(2) states that, “consistent means that the density of the proposed project is the same or less than the standard expressed for the involved parcel in the general plan, community plan or zoning action for which an EIR has been certified, and that the project complies with the density-related standards contained in that plan or zoning. Where the zoning ordinance refers to the general plan or community plan for its density standard, the project shall be consistent with the applicable plan”. An EIR must have been certified by the Lead Agency for the community plan, the zoning action or the General Plan, for these provisions to apply. Section 15183(a) of the CEQA Guidelines provides that, in approving a project meeting these requirements, “a public agency shall limit its examination of environmental effects to those impacts that the agency determines, in an Initial Study or other analysis: • are peculiar to the project or the parcel on which the project would be located, • are not analyzed as significant effects in a prior EIR on the zoning action, General Plan or community plan, • are potentially significant off-site impacts and cumulative impacts that were not discussed in the prior EIR prepared for the general plan, community plan or zoning action, or • are previously identified significant effects which, as a result of substantial new information which was not known at the time the prior EIR was certified, are determined to have a more severe adverse impact than discussed in the prior EIR” When reviewing the environmental effects of the Project pursuant to these provisions, an effect of the Project on the environment shall not be considered peculiar to the Project if uniformly applied development policies or standards have been previously adopted by the City. A finding must have been made that the applicable development policies or standards will substantially mitigate environmental effects when applied to future projects, unless substantial new information shows that the policies or standards will not substantially mitigate the environmental effect. The finding shall be based on substantial evidence, which need not include an EIR. This Initial Study/CEQA Checklist includes information to determine whether the Project is consistent with the development density established by existing zoning and the General Plan Update. The CEQA Checklist also examines whether the potential impacts of the Project have already been addressed in the City of Palm Desert General Plan Update, or whether the Project may have Project-specific significant effects which are peculiar to the Project or its site. 1.2 Potential for Additional Environmental Review The provisions of CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 for projects that are consistent with a Community Plan or zoning would not apply to the Project if it were inconsistent with the development density established 184 City of Palm Desert Shadow Ridge Project, PP 23-0023/VTTM 38866 SECTION 15183 ANALYSIS TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES Page 8 by the Palm Desert General Plan and applicable zoning regulations. These CEQA provisions would not apply if the Project would have Project-specific significant environmental effects that are peculiar to the Project or its site, or if the Project would result in new or more severe significant environmental effects than were previously addressed in the prior Palm Desert General Plan Update EIR (also referred to as the “Prior EIR” or the Program EIR” in this analysis). Under such circumstances, the Project would trigger preparation of a Mitigated Negative Declaration or an Environmental Impact Report (EIR). This Initial Study fully analyzes the environmental impacts of the Project to determine the most appropriate approach for CEQA documentation of the Project in light of the certified General Plan Update EIR and provides substantial evidence to support the conclusion that the Project is exempt from further CEQA review pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15183. 185 City of Palm Desert Shadow Ridge Project, PP 23-0023/VTTM 38866 SECTION 15183 ANALYSIS TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES Page 9 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Aesthetics Agriculture and Forestry Resources Air Quality Biological Resources Cultural Resources Geology / Soils Greenhouse Gas Emissions Hazards & Hazardous Materials Hydrology & Water Quality Land Use / Planning Mineral Resources Noise Population / Housing Public Services Recreation Transportation Tribal Cultural Resources Utilities / Service Systems Wildfire Mandatory Findings of Significance 186 City of Palm Desert Shadow Ridge Project, PP 23-0023/VTTM 38866 SECTION 15183 ANALYSIS TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES Page 10 Reasons why the Project is exempt: Aesthetics Would the Project: General Plan EIR Findings Relationship to General Plan EIR Findings: Project Conclusions: Equal or Less Severe New or Substantial Increase in Severity Applicable Standards and Requirements Resulting Level of Significance a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista LTS with MM  ☐ - LTS b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including but not limited to trees, and rock outcroppings LTS with MM  ☐ - LTS c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings LTS  ☐ - LTS d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area LTS  ☐ - LTS SUBSTANTIATION Background The General Plan Update EIR evaluated potential aesthetic impacts on a City-wide basis on pages 4.1-1 through 4.1-11. The same four issues identified above were evaluated and determined to result in a less than significant impact on the City’s environment, including cumulative impacts, without mitigation. This finding acknowledged that future development under the General Plan would alter the existing aesthetic environment within the City, but based on implementation of the General Plan update policies and programs, and compliance with the Palm Desert Municipal Code the impact of these potential changes would be less than significant. Replacing time share units with 93 single family homes would result in impacts to scenic resources would be less than significant and would not result in a substantially greater or new significant impact. Project specific findings for these aesthetic issues are presented in the following evaluation. a. Less Than Significant Impact – Adverse impacts to scenic vistas can occur in one of two ways. First, an area itself may contain existing scenic vistas that would be altered by new development. A review of the PP23-0023/VTTM 38866 site determined that there are no scenic vistas/values located internally within the area proposed for the development of the proposed project. The project site is located near the existing City Sheriff’s Station (north) and Marriott’s Shadow Ridge Golf Club clubhouse (west) and nearby two-story time share units (west), and adjacent to the Shadow Ridge Golf Course (surrounds the project site). Refer to the aerial photo in Figure 3. The remaining vacant desert habitat east of the site contains the same vegetation that is currently found within the project site. The development of the PP23-0023/VTTM 38866, Single-Family Residential Project, will not impact any important scenic vistas/ values within the project area. 187 City of Palm Desert Shadow Ridge Project, PP 23-0023/VTTM 38866 SECTION 15183 ANALYSIS TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES Page 11 A scenic vista impact can also occur when a scenic vista can be viewed from the project area or immediate vicinity and a proposed development may interfere with the view to a scenic vista. A scenic vista impact can also occur when a scenic vista can be viewed from the project area or immediate vicinity and a proposed development may interfere with the existing view to a scenic vista. The City of Palm Desert General Plan indicates that the natural scenic resources identified in the General Plan EIR consist of views to the mountain ranges to the north (San Bernardino), southwest (San Jacinto) and south-southeast (Santa Rosa). The Project site is oriented in an area in which these important visual features are already compromised by the ongoing mixed development in the area surrounding the project site. These interrupted foreground views indicate that development at this site would not add substantially to interruption of any important public views in any direction once developed. By complying with height limitations, required building setbacks, placing electric utilities underground, and appropriate scale landscaping, the use of desert colors and tones as required by the City’s Development Code, the proposed Project would have a less than significant impact on scenic vistas or scenic values at this site without any mitigation. This is consistent with the City General Plan EIR finding for this issue. b. Less Than Significant Impact – The project site consists of a highly disturbed native desert habitat with no distinctive features, such as trees or rock outcrops. The site has no distinctive topographic feature that visually distinguish the site. The site is essentially uniformly lacking in elevation change due to its location on the alluvial deposits in the project area. The site has been designated for resort- oriented development under both the prior General Plan and the current Palm Desert General Plan. No roadways within the vicinity of the project site are considered eligible for official designation as a County or State Scenic Highways. No other scenic resources are located within the project site, and as such, there are no important scenic resources within the site that would be damaged as a result of development of the proposed project. Therefore, there is a less than significant potential to damage a scenic onsite resource and no mitigation is required. c. Less Than Significant Impact – The PP23-0023/VTTM 38866, Single-Family Residential site is located within an urbanizing area on the north side of the City of Palm Desert. The City of Palm Desert has indicated that development of the project site with resort-oriented residential uses can be considered with the Resort and Entertainment use designation and the PR-5 zoning classification. By developing this vacant site in accordance with City General Plan and design guidelines, this single- family residential use, the visual character of this site will be converted to a suburban resort oriented visual setting consistent with nearby time-share residential uses. With the City’s design elements mandated and incorporated in the proposed project, implementation will be consistent with the surrounding urban setting and the potential aesthetic impacts to the site will result in a less than significant adverse aesthetic impact. This is consistent with the City General Plan EIR finding for this issue. d. Less Than Significant Impact – The implementation of the proposed project will create new sources of light during the occupancy phase of the project. Light and glare from interior and exterior building lighting, safety and security slighting, and vehicular traffic accessing the site will generate new light once the site is occupied. The proposed project must be developed in accordance with the City’s Development Code and General Plan. The General Plan EIR discusses the City’s requirements for maximum height of exterior lighting, the number of fixtures anticipated along roadways and the intensity of light, which would ensure that any building or exterior lighting would not significantly impact adjacent uses. Thus, the proposed project will not introduce a new source of light into the project area, and the City’s standard design requirements can limit the lighting impacts to the project site. Based on this finding, the potential lighting-related impacts of this proposed project would be less than or equivalent to the impacts previously disclosed for the original Shadow Ridge Resort. As noted above, the General Plan EIR concluded that all potential aesthetic impacts would cause a less than significant adverse impact through implementation of the City’s aesthetic design requirements. Based on this finding, the proposed project’s implementation will not contribute to a project specific or cumulatively 188 City of Palm Desert Shadow Ridge Project, PP 23-0023/VTTM 38866 SECTION 15183 ANALYSIS TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES Page 12 considerable adverse aesthetic impact. The proposed 93-unit residential subdivision would have less massing and greater landscaping than the approved 324-unit timeshare development included in the resort development. The project would not result in any peculiar impacts or any new significant impacts that were not identified in the General Plan EIR. The type and intensity of use proposed as part of the proposed project is consistent with the development anticipated, analyzed, and approved as part of the adopted General Plan Update and evaluated in the General Plan Update EIR. Accordingly, no further review is required. Thus, the modified project will have approximately the same visual appearance as the approved project. The proposed implementation of the modified project is not forecast to cause any new or peculiar significant negative alteration of any aesthetic or visual impacts when compared to the 2016 EIR, nor will the project result in any off-site or cumulative impact. No new or greater negative aesthetic impacts will result from implementing the modified project. Approval of the modified project does not result in any new significant impacts or in a substantial increase in the severity of the impacts evaluated in the EIR. Agriculture and Forestry Resources Would the Project: General Plan EIR Findings Relationship to General Plan EIR Findings: Project Conclusions: Equal or Less Severe New or Substantial Increase in Severity Applicable Standards and Requirements Resulting Level of Significance a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? No impact  ☐ - No impact b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use or a Williamson Act contract? No impact  ☐ - No impact c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g))? No impact  ☐ - No impact d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? No impact  ☐ - No impact e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? No impact  ☐ - No impact 189 City of Palm Desert Shadow Ridge Project, PP 23-0023/VTTM 38866 SECTION 15183 ANALYSIS TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES Page 13 SUBSTANTIATION Background The General Plan Update EIR evaluated potential agricultural and forestry impacts on a City-wide basis on pages 4.2-1 through 4.2-7. The same five issues identified above were evaluated and concluded to pose no adverse impact on the City’s environment, including cumulative impacts, without mitigation. According to the General Plan Technical Background Report (TBR), the Planning Area, which is made up of the City boundary and the Sphere of Influence, does not contain any land designated for agricultural uses or land zoned for agricultural uses. Small areas designated within the Planning Area may contain historically farmed areas, but these areas are no longer in production and have been designated for other uses. There are no forestry resources located within the City. Therefore, the General Plan EIR concluded no impact under the five issues above and a less than significant impact cumulatively for both topics under this issue within the City. The project would not result in any new significant impacts or in a substantial increase in the severity of the less than significant impacts identified in the General Plan EIR. Project specific findings regarding agriculture and timber issues are presented in the following evaluation. a-e. No Impact – The project site has not historically been used for agriculture or timber (forestry) management purposes. Accordingly, the City has not designated this site nor zoned this site for agricultural use or timber management, as the General Plan designation and Zoning classifications are both in support of Resort and Entertainment land uses, including these new resort-oriented residences. This indicates that the City intends for the project site to be developed for a use that would suit this land use designation/zoning classification which it has assigned this project site. Therefore, given that the City does not identify the project site for agricultural use, and that no Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland or Farmland of Statewide Importance has been identified within the project site, implementation of the proposed project and conversion of the project site to the proposed single-family residential uses will not pose any significant adverse impact to or conflict with agricultural resources or values. No mitigation is required. Similarly, the project site is not located within forest land, timberland or timberland zoned for Timberland Production. Therefore, the proposed project will not conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g)). No adverse impacts are anticipated and no mitigation is required. The City General Plan EIR concluded that all potential agricultural and forestry impacts would cause no adverse impacts with no mitigation. Based on this finding, the proposed project’s implementation is determined to not contribute to a less than significant cumulatively considerable adverse agricultural and forestry impacts within the City. The project would not result in any significant impacts peculiar to the project or parcel, or in a substantial increase in the severity of the less than significant impacts agriculture and forestry impacts identified in the General Plan EIR. The type and intensity of use proposed as part of the proposed project is consistent with the development anticipated, analyzed, and approved as part of the adopted General Plan Update and evaluated in the General Plan Update EIR. Thus, constructing 93 single family homes instead of 324 time share units would not cause any significant change in conclusions regarding agricultural and forestry resources when compared to the 2016 EIR. No peculiar or greater negative agricultural or forestry resource impacts will result from implementing the modified project. Approval of the modified project does not result in any new significant impacts or in a substantial increase in the severity of the impacts evaluated in the EIR that would render Section 15183 inapplicable to the project. 190 City of Palm Desert Shadow Ridge Project, PP 23-0023/VTTM 38866 SECTION 15183 ANALYSIS TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES Page 14 Air Quality Would the Project: General Plan EIR Findings General Plan EIR Findings: Project Conclusions: Equal or Less Severe New or Substantial Increase in Severity Applicable Standards and Requirements Resulting Level of Significance a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan LTS  ☐ - LTS b) Violate an air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation SU  ☐ LTS c) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations LTS  ☐ - LTS d) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people LTS  ☐ - LTS e) Greenhouse gas emissions SU  ☐ - LTS SUBSTANTIATION: The following information is provided based on a study titled “Shadow Ridge Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas & Energy Assessment,” prepared by Urban Crossroads dated March 12, 2024 and provided as Appendix 1 to this Section 15183 analysis. Background The General Plan Update EIR evaluated potential air quality impacts on a City-wide basis on pages 4.3-1 through 4.3.23. The same four issues identified above were evaluated and concluded to pose a less than significant impact on the City’s environment, including cumulative impacts, without mitigation. This finding acknowledged that future development under the General Plan would alter the existing air emissions from future development within the City, but based on implementation of the General Plan update policies and programs, compliance with the Palm Desert Municipal Code, and compliance with South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Rules and Regulations, the impact of these potential future emissions would be less than significant. Project specific findings on these air quality issues are presented in the following evaluation. Air Quality Setting SALTON SEA AIR BASIN (SSAB) The Project site is located within the Salton Sea Air Basin (SSAB) within the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). The SSAB (also referred to herein as “the Basin”) is aligned in a north-west-southwest orientation stretching from Banning Pass to the Mexican border. The regional climate, as well as the temperature, wind, humidity, precipitation, and amount of sunshine significantly influence the air quality in the Basin. The climate of the Coachella Valley is a continental, desert-type climate, with hot summers, mild winters, and very little annual rainfall. Precipitation is less than six inches annually and occurs mostly in the winter months from active frontal systems and in the late summer months from thunderstorms. Almost all of the annual rainfall comes from the fringes of mid-latitude storms from late November to early April with summers often being completely dry. Temperatures exceed 100 degrees Fahrenheit (°F), on average, for four months each year, with daily highs near 110 °F during July and August. 191 City of Palm Desert Shadow Ridge Project, PP 23-0023/VTTM 38866 SECTION 15183 ANALYSIS TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES Page 15 Summer nights are cooler with minimum temperatures in the mid-70s. During the winter season, daytime highs are quite mild, but the dry air is conducive to nocturnal radiational cooling, with early morning lows around 40 °F. The Coachella Valley and adjacent areas are exposed to frequent gusty winds. The flat terrain of the valley and strong temperature differentials, created by intense solar heating, produce moderate winds and deep thermal convection. Wind speeds exceeding 31 miles per hour (mph) occur most frequently in April and May. On an annual basis, strong winds (greater than 31 mph) are observed 0.6 percent of the time and speeds of less than 6.8 mph account for more than one-half of the observed winds. Prevailing winds are from the northwest through southwest, with secondary flows from the southeast. The strongest and most persistent winds typically occur immediately to the east of Banning Pass, which is noted as a wind power generation resource area. Aside from this locale, the wind conditions in the remainder of the Coachella Valley are geographically distinct. Stronger winds tend to occur closer to the foothills. Less frequently, widespread gusty winds occur over all areas of the Valley. Portions of the SSAB experience surface inversions almost every day of the year. Inversions in the SSAB are attributed to strong surface heating, but are usually broken, allowing pollutants to disperse more easily. Weak surface inversions are caused by cooling of air in contact with the cold surface of the earth at night. In the valleys and low-lying areas, this condition is intensified by the addition of cold air flowing downslope from the hills and pooling on the valley floor. In addition, inversions in the SSAB caused by the presence of the Pacific high-pressure cell can cause the air mass aloft to sink. As the air descends, compressional heating warms the air to a temperature higher than the air below. This subsidence inversion can act as a nearly impenetrable lid to the vertical mixing of pollutants. These inversions can persist for one or more days, causing air stagnation and the buildup of pollutants. Subsidence inversions are common from November through June and are relatively absent from July through October. Within the Project area, there is a natural sand migration process, called “blowsand,” that has direct and indirect effects on air quality. Blowsand produces particulate matter (PM10) in two ways: (1) by direct particle erosion and fragmentation as natural PM10, and (2) by secondary effects, as sand deposits on road surfaces. Also, where water has already receded around the Salton Sea, the surface areas contain a salty mix of sediments that can change from a hardened salt crust to a fluffy soft layer of dust depending upon the season. Exposed sediments could elevate PM10 levels throughout the region. Almost 120,000 acres of Salton Sea lakebed could be exposed as inflows to the Sea decrease in future years. Local communities may be affected by 60,000 potentially dust-blowing acres, which will future cause PM10 levels to rise. Please refer to Appendix 1 for a discussion of Criteria Air Pollutants and air quality regulations (federal state and local) that apply to the project area/site. AIR QUALITY REGIONAL EMISSIONS THRESHOLDS The SCAQMD has developed regional significance thresholds for criteria pollutants, as summarized in Table III-1. The SCAQMD’s CEQA Air Quality Significance Thresholds (March 2023) indicate that any projects in the Salton Sea Air Basin (SSAB) with daily emissions that exceed any of the indicated thresholds should be considered as having an individually and cumulatively significant air quality impact. Table III-1 MAXIMUM DAILY REGIONAL EMISSIONS THRESHOLDS Pollutant Construction Operations NOX 100 lbs/day 55 lbs/day VOC 75 lbs/day 55 lbs/day PM10 150 lbs/day 150 lbs/day PM2.5 55 lbs/day 55 lbs/day SOX 150 lbs/day 150 lbs/day CO 550 lbs/day 550 lbs/day 192 City of Palm Desert Shadow Ridge Project, PP 23-0023/VTTM 38866 SECTION 15183 ANALYSIS TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES Page 16 lbs/day – Pounds Per Day a. Less Than Significant Impact ‒ The Project site is located within the SSAB and is subject to SCAQMD’s 2022 AQMP and the 2003 CV PM10 SIP. The SCAQMD has jurisdiction over an approximately 10,743 square-mile area consisting of the four-county Basin and the Los Angeles County and Riverside County portions of what use to be referred to as the Southeast Desert Air Basin. In these areas, the SCAQMD is principally responsible for air pollution control, and works directly with the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), county transportation commissions, local governments, as well as state and federal agencies to reduce emissions from stationary, mobile, and indirect sources to meet state and federal ambient air quality standards. Currently, these state and federal air quality standards are exceeded in most parts of the SSAB. In response, the SCAQMD has adopted a series of AQMPs to meet the state and federal ambient air quality standards. AQMPs are updated regularly in order to more effectively reduce emissions, accommodate growth, and to minimize any negative fiscal impacts of air pollution control on the economy. In December 2022, the SCAQMD released the Final 2022 AQMP (2022 AQMP). The 2022 AQMP continues to evaluate current integrated strategies and control measures to meet the CAAQS, as well as explore new and innovative methods to reach its goals. Some of these approaches include utilizing incentive programs, recognizing existing co-benefit programs from other sectors, and developing a strategy with fair-share reductions at the federal, state, and local levels (13). Similar to the 2016 AQMP, the 2022 AQMP incorporates scientific and technological information and planning assumptions, including the 2020-2045 RTP/SCS, a planning document that supports the integration of land use and transportation to help the region meet the federal CAA requirements (14). The Project’s consistency with the AQMP is determined using the 2022 AQMP as discussed below. SCAG adopted the 2020-2045 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (2020-2045 RTP/SCS), a planning document that supports the integration of land use and transportation to help the region meet the federal metropolitan planning organization (MPO) requirements under the Sustainable communities and Climate Protection Act. The proposed Project would be developed in accordance with all applicable rules and regulations contained in those plans. Criteria for determining consistency with the AQMP are defined in Chapter 12, Section 12.2 and Section 12.3 of the 1993 CEQA Handbook (18). These indicators are discussed below. The proposed Project will not result in an increase in the frequency or severity of existing air quality violations or cause or contribute to new violations or delay the timely attainment of air quality standards or the interim emissions reductions specified in the AQMP. The violations under this criterion refer to the CAAQS and NAAQS. CAAQS and NAAQS violations would occur if regional or localized significance thresholds were exceeded. As evaluated, the Project’s regional and localized construction and operational-source emissions would not exceed applicable regional significance thresholds. Therefore, the Project is determined to be consistent with the first criterion. As such, a less than significant impact is forecast consistent with the prior General Plan Update EIR analysis, and the Project would not result in a substantially greater impact compared to the EIR analysis. The Project will not exceed the assumptions in the AQMP based on the years assigned to the Project build-out phase. The 2022 AQMP demonstrates that the applicable ambient air quality standards can be achieved within the timeframes required under federal law. Growth projections from local general plans adopted by cities in the district are provided to the SCAG, which develops regional growth forecasts, which are then used to develop future air quality forecasts for the AQMP. Development consistent with the growth projections in the General Plan is considered to be consistent with the AQMP. 193 City of Palm Desert Shadow Ridge Project, PP 23-0023/VTTM 38866 SECTION 15183 ANALYSIS TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES Page 17 Peak day emissions generated by construction activities are largely independent of land use assignments, but rather are a function of development scope and maximum area of disturbance. Irrespective of the site’s land use designation, development of the site to its maximum potential would likely occur, with disturbance of the entire site occurring during construction activities. As such, when considering that no emissions thresholds will be exceeded, a less than significant impact would result. The General Plan designates the Project site as Low Density Residential and Planned Residential (PR-5) zoning uses. The “Low Density Residential” land use designation allows single family residential uses and the existing CUP that governs the Resort provides for a range of entertainment and resort destination uses that require large amounts of land that draws visitors to the City such as hotels, sports and theme park facilities (15). The Planned Residential District (PR-5) zoning district provides for flexibility in residential development, by encouraging creative and imaginative design, and the development of parcels of land as coordinated projects involving a mixture of residential densities (4.0—40.0 du/ac), mixed housing types, and community facilities. The district is characterized as providing for the optimum integration of urban and natural amenities within developments and is organized around formal, walkable, and highly connected streetscapes. Under the existing entitlements, up to 324 time share units can and were proposed to be developed on the Project’s 20.69-acre site. The proposed Project includes the development of 93 single family detached residential dwelling units. The Project’s proposed uses substantially lower than what is authorized to be constructed and the City has indicated that these proposed units are consistent with the site’s land use designation and zoning designation and a general plan and zoning amendment will not be required. The Project is determined to be consistent with the second criterion. As the proposed Project is consistent with the site’s land use and zoning designation, would not exceed any applicable regional or local thresholds, and would not result in or cause NAAQS or CAAQS violations, the Project is therefore consistent with the AQMP and a less than significant impact is forecast. The project would not result in any new significant impacts or in a substantial increase in the severity of the less than significant impacts identified in the General Plan EIR. b. Less Than Significant Impact – The CAAQS designate the Project site as nonattainment for O3, PM10, and PM2.5 while the NAAQS designates the Project site as nonattainment for O3 and PM2.5. The SCAQMD published a report on addressing cumulative impacts from air pollution. This analysis assumes that individual projects that do not generate operational or construction emissions that exceed the SCAQMD’s recommended daily thresholds for project-specific impacts would also not cause a cumulatively considerable increase in emissions for those pollutants for which SSAB is in nonattainment, and, therefore, would not be considered to have a significant, adverse air quality impact. Individual project-related construction and operational emissions would not exceed SCAQMD thresholds for project-specific impacts and would not be considered cumulatively considerable. The estimated maximum daily construction emissions without mitigation are summarized on Table III-2. Detailed construction model outputs are presented in Attachment A of Appendix 1. Under the assumed scenarios, emissions resulting from the Project construction will not exceed thresholds established by the SCAQMD for emissions of any criteria pollutant and under this circumstance no mitigation is required. However, SCAQMD seeks to minimize emissions of pollutants that contribute to nonattainment. Therefore, even though the impact is less than significant, the proposed Project must implement fugitive dust and NOx controls as required by SCAQMD rules and regulation to reduce particulates and pollutants that contribute to ozone consistent with the General Plan Update EIR. 194 City of Palm Desert Shadow Ridge Project, PP 23-0023/VTTM 38866 SECTION 15183 ANALYSIS TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES Page 18 Table III-2 OVERALL REGIONAL CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS SUMMARY Source Emissions (lbs/day) VOC NOX CO SOX PM10 PM2.5 Summer 2024 1.03 7.87 13.30 0.02 0.99 0.46 2025 2.67 2.77 5.78 0.01 0.71 0.24 2026 2.66 2.67 5.52 0.01 0.70 0.23 2027 2.64 2.60 5.29 0.01 0.70 0.23 Winter 2024 4.23 42.94 33.97 0.08 8.95 4.00 2025 2.86 28.10 23.50 0.07 6.57 2.52 2026 2.64 2.81 4.24 0.01 0.71 0.24 2027 2.63 2.71 4.09 0.01 0.70 0.23 2028 2.62 2.64 3.94 0.01 0.70 0.23 Maximum Daily Emissions 4.23 42.94 33.97 0.08 8.95 4.00 SCAQMD Regional Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55 Threshold Exceeded? NO NO NO NO NO NO 1PM10 and PM2.5 source emissions reflect 3x daily watering per SCAQMD Rule 403 for fugitive dust. Operational activities associated with the Project would result in emissions of CO, VOCs, NOX, SOX, PM10, and PM2.5. Operational related emissions are expected from the following primary sources: area source emissions, energy source emissions, and mobile source emissions. The Project related operational air quality impacts derive primarily from vehicle trips generated by the Project. Trip characteristics available from the Trip Generation Assessment was utilized in this analysis. The estimated operation-source emissions from the Project are summarized on Table III-3. Detailed operation model outputs are presented in Attachment A of Appendix 1. As shown on Table III-3, operational- source emissions would not exceed the applicable SCAQMD regional thresholds for emissions of any criteria pollutant and no mitigation is required. Table III-3 TOTAL PROJECT REGIONAL OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS Source Emissions (lbs/day) VOC NOX CO SOX PM10 PM2.5 Summer Mobile Source 3.21 3.41 35.77 0.09 7.88 2.04 Area Source 5.53 1.44 5.88 0.01 0.11 0.11 Energy Source 0.05 0.84 0.36 0.01 0.07 0.07 Total Maximum Daily Emissions 8.79 5.68 42.01 0.11 8.06 2.22 SCAQMD Regional Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55 Threshold Exceeded? NO NO NO NO NO NO 195 City of Palm Desert Shadow Ridge Project, PP 23-0023/VTTM 38866 SECTION 15183 ANALYSIS TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES Page 19 Source Emissions (lbs/day) VOC NOX CO SOX PM10 PM2.5 Winter Mobile Source 2.63 3.70 23.97 0.08 7.88 2.04 Area Source 5.07 1.39 0.59 0.01 0.11 0.11 Energy Source 0.05 0.84 0.36 0.01 0.07 0.07 Total Maximum Daily Emissions 7.75 5.93 24.91 0.09 8.06 2.22 SCAQMD Regional Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55 Threshold Exceeded? NO NO NO NO NO NO Construction activities are not anticipated to cause dust emissions to exceed SCAQMD CEQA thresholds. Nevertheless, emissions minimization through enhanced dust control measures is recommended for use because of the non-attainment status of the air basin. Similarly, ozone precursor emissions (ROG and NOx) during construction are calculated to be below SCAQMD CEQA thresholds. However, because of the regional non-attainment for photochemical smog, the use of reasonably available control measures provided in SCAQMD rules and regulations will be incorporated into the project design consistent with the General Plan EIR. and include: Appendix 1 also contains a comparative evaluation of the proposed project (93 single-family residences) with the approved project (324 timeshare units) and the comparative data are provided in Table 8 and 9 of the Appendix. The proposed Project will generate substantially less air emissions than the existing approved project for the site. The project would not result in any new significant impacts or in a substantial increase in the severity of air quality impacts identified in the General Plan EIR, and no further review is required. c. Less Than Significant Impact – For this project, the appropriate SRA for the Local Significance Thresholds (LSTs) analysis is the SCAQMD Coachella Valley monitoring station (SRA 30). LSTs apply to CO, NO2, PM10, and PM2.5. The SCAQMD produced look-up tables for projects less than or equal to 5 acres in size. The SCAQMD’s screening look-up tables are utilized in determining localized impacts. It should be noted that since the look-up tables identify thresholds at only 1 acre, 2 acres, and 5 acres, linear regression has been utilized to determine localized significance thresholds. Consistent with SCAQMD guidance, the LST thresholds presented in Appendix 1 were calculated by interpolating the threshold values for the Project’s disturbed acreage. The acres disturbed is based on the equipment list and days in the demolition, site preparation, and grading phase according to the anticipated maximum number of acres a given piece of equipment can pass over in an 8-hour workday. The equipment-specific grading rates are summarized in the CalEEMod user’s guide, Appendix A: Calculation Details for CalEEMod. It should be noted that the disturbed area per day is representative of a piece of equipment making multiple passes over the same land area. In other words, one Rubber Tired Dozer can make multiple passes over the same land area totaling 0.5 acres in a given 8-hour day. Appendix A of the CalEEMod User Manual only identifies equipment-specific grading rates for Crawler Tractors, Graders, Rubber Tired Dozers, and Scrapers. For analytical purposes, emissions associated with peak, site preparation, and grading activities are considered for purposes of localized significance thresholds (LSTs) since this phase represents the maximum localized emissions that would occur. The Project’s construction activities could disturb a maximum of approximately, 0.5 acre per day for site preparation, and 3 acres per day for grading activities. Any other construction phases of development would result in lesser emissions and consequently lesser impacts. The analysis performed in Appendix 1 uses the methodology included in the SCAQMD Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology (LST Methodology). The SCAQMD has established 196 City of Palm Desert Shadow Ridge Project, PP 23-0023/VTTM 38866 SECTION 15183 ANALYSIS TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES Page 20 that impacts to air quality are significant if there is a potential to contribute or cause localized exceedances of the federal and/or state ambient air quality standards (NAAQS/CAAQS). Collectively, these are referred to as Localized Significance Thresholds (LSTs). The SCAQMD established LSTs in response to the SCAQMD Governing Board’s Environmental Justice Initiative I-4. LSTs represent the maximum emissions from a project that will not cause or contribute to an exceedance of the most stringent applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard at the sensitive receptor. The SCAQMD states that lead agencies can use the LSTs as another indicator of significance in its air quality impact analyses. The SCAQMD recommends that the nearest sensitive receptor be considered when determining the Project’s potential to cause an individual or cumulatively significant impact. The nearest land use where an individual could remain for 24 hours to the Project site has been used to determine localized construction and operational air quality impacts for emissions of PM10 and PM2.5 (since PM10 and PM2.5 thresholds are based on a 24-hour averaging time). The nearest receptor used for evaluation of localized impacts of PM10 and PM2.5 is location R1 represented by the Marriott Shadow Ridge building at 9001 Shadow Ridge Rd, approximately 386 feet (118 meters) north of the Project site. As such, for evaluation of localized PM10 and PM2.5, a 118-meter distance will be used. Receptors in the project study area shown on Exhibit 2 of Appendix 1. As previously stated, and consistent with LST Methodology, the nearest industrial/commercial use to the Project site is used to determine construction and operational LST air impacts for emissions of NOX and CO as the averaging periods for these pollutants are shorter (8 hours or less) and it is reasonable to assume that an individual could be present at these sites for periods of one to 8 hours. The nearest receptor used for evaluation of localized impacts of NOx and CO is location R5 represented by Marriott's Shadow Ridge I-The Villages at 10938 West Pico Boulevard, approximately 710 feet (216 meters) east of the Project site. As such, for evaluation of localized NOx and CO, a 216-meter distance will be used. Table III-4 identifies the localized impacts at the nearest receptor location in the vicinity of the Project. Outputs from the model runs for construction LSTs are provided in Attachment A of Appendix 1. For analytical purposes, emissions associated with peak site preparation and grading activities are considered for purposes of LSTs since these phases represents the maximum localized emissions that would occur. Any other construction phases of development that overlap would result in lesser emissions and consequently lesser impacts than what is disclosed herein. As shown in Table 5, emissions resulting from the construction will not exceed the numerical thresholds of significance established by the SCAQMD for any criteria pollutant. Thus, a less than significant impact would occur for localized project-related construction-source emissions and no mitigation is required. The project would not result in any new significant impacts or in a substantial increase in the severity of air quality impacts identified in the General Plan EIR. Table III-4 PROJECT LOCALIZED CONSTRUCTION IMPACTS On-Site Emissions Emissions (lbs/day) NOX CO PM10 PM2.5 Site Preparation Maximum Daily Emissions 10.38 8.42 2.17 1.30 SCAQMD Localized Threshold 234 2,678 83 26 Threshold Exceeded? NO NO NO NO Grading Maximum Daily Emissions 30.20 24.32 6.09 2.50 SCAQMD Localized Threshold 361 4,778 104 36 197 City of Palm Desert Shadow Ridge Project, PP 23-0023/VTTM 38866 SECTION 15183 ANALYSIS TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES Page 21 Threshold Exceeded? NO NO NO NO The proposed project consists of 93 single family detached residential dwelling units. According to SCAQMD LST methodology, LSTs would apply to the operational phase of a proposed project, if the project includes stationary sources, or attracts mobile sources that may spend long periods queuing and idling at the site (e.g., transfer facilities and warehouse buildings). The proposed Project does not include such uses, and thus, due to the lack of significant stationary source emissions, no LST analysis is needed for operations. Please refer to Appendix 1 for a discussion of other potential local air polluting situations, such as Carbon Monoxide (CO). d. Less Than Significant Impact – The potential for the Project to generate objectionable odors has also been considered. Land uses generally associated with odor complaints include: • Agricultural uses (livestock and farming) • Wastewater treatment plants • Food processing plants • Chemical plants • Composting operations • Refineries • Landfills • Dairies • Fiberglass molding facilities The proposed Project does not contain land uses typically associated with emitting objectionable odors. Potential odor sources associated with the proposed Project may result from construction equipment exhaust and the application of asphalt and architectural coatings during construction activities and the temporary storage of typical solid waste (refuse) associated with the proposed Project’s (long-term operational) uses. Standard construction requirements would minimize odor impacts from construction. The construction odor emissions would be temporary, short-term, and intermittent in nature and would cease upon completion of the respective phase of construction and is thus considered less than significant. It is required that Project-generated refuse be stored in covered containers and removed at regular intervals in compliance with the solid waste regulations. The proposed Project would also be required to comply with SCAQMD Rule 402 to prevent occurrences of public nuisances. Therefore, odors associated with the proposed Project construction and operations would be less than significant and no mitigation is required. The type and intensity of use proposed as part of the proposed project is consistent with the development anticipated, analyzed, and approved as part of the adopted General Plan Update and evaluated in the General Plan Update EIR. The project would not result in any impacts peculiar to the project or parcel or impacts that were not analyzed in the General Plan EIR, or result in any potentially significant offsite or cumulative impacts. Thus, approval of new project entitlements for the modified project does not result in any new significant air quality impacts or in a substantial increase in the severity of the impacts evaluated in the EIR that that would render Section 15183 inapplicable to the project. Biological Resources Would the Project: General Plan EIR Findings General Plan EIR Findings: Project Conclusions: Equal or Less Severe New or Substantial Increase in Severity Applicable Standards and Requirements Resulting Level of Significance 198 City of Palm Desert Shadow Ridge Project, PP 23-0023/VTTM 38866 SECTION 15183 ANALYSIS TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES Page 22 a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service LTS with MM  ☐ LTS with MM b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service LTS with MM  ☐ LTS with MM c) Have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means LTS with MM  ☐ LTS with MM d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites LTS with MM  ☐ LTS with PR e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance LTS  ☐ VMC Chapter 10.12 LTS with PR f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan No Impact  ☐ - No Impact SUBSTANTIATION: The following information is provided based on a study titled “Biological Resources Assessment, Jurisdictional Delineation, and CVMSHCP Consistency Analysis for the Shadow Ridge Development, City of Palm Desert, Riverside County, California” (BRA) prepared by Jennings Environ- mental dated November 2023 and provided as Appendix 2. Background The General Plan Update EIR evaluated potential biological resource impacts on a City-wide basis on pages 4.5-1 through 4.5-29. The same six issues identified above were evaluated and concluded to pose a less than significant impact on the City’s environment, including cumulative impacts, without mitigation. This finding acknowledged that future development under the General Plan could adversely impact sensitive biological resources located within the City boundary, but based on implementation of the General Plan update policies and programs, and compliance with the CVMSHCP and other state and federal regulations, the impact of these potential changes to the environment would be less than significant. 199 City of Palm Desert Shadow Ridge Project, PP 23-0023/VTTM 38866 SECTION 15183 ANALYSIS TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES Page 23 Project specific findings on these Biological Resource issues are presented in the following evaluation. BRA Findings The BRA reached the following findings regarding biological resources based on the research and field survey of the site. HABITAT The habitat on-site consists of sparse vegetation with a mixture of Brittle bush scrub (Encelia farinosa Shrubland Alliance) and bare ground. Table 1 in Appendix D of Appendix 2 contains a list of all plants found on-site. The site is disturbed with evidence of past material storage and current material storage. Also, the site is surrounded by a developed golf course. There was also evidence of human disturbance in the form of foot traffic and tire marks. WILDLIFE Species observed or otherwise detected on or in the vicinity of the project site during the surveys included; mourning dove (Zenaida macroura) and common raven (Corvus corax). Table 1 in Appendix D of Appendix 2 contains a list of all animal species found on-site. SPECIAL STATUS SPECIES Desert Tortoise No suitable habitat for desert tortoises exists within the Project site or surrounding area. There are no documented desert tortoise occurrences within the Project site or the surrounding area, and this species is not expected to occur within the Project area. Additionally, the Project site is outside of the Designated Critical Habitat for this species. Therefore, no potential direct or indirect impacts on desert tortoise can be identified, and presence/absence surveys for this species are not warranted or recommended. Burrowing owl (BUOW) Based on the October 2023 field survey, the site does not contain suitable habitat for this species. No burrowing owls were observed during the site visit. No burrows of any kind were located within the Project site. No portion of the Project site showed any evidence of past or present BUOW activity. No feathers, whitewash, or castings were found and no suitable burrow surrogate species are present on-site. Therefore, no suitable habitat exists on-site, and no focused surveys are required. Coachella Valley Fringe-toed Lizard The sand sheets and sand dunes preferred by the Coachella Valley fringe-toed lizard do not exist on site. The site is completely surrounded by development and is not subject to the historical wind regimes this species prefers. Additionally, as mentioned above, the soils on-site have been altered by the current and historical stockpiling from the Shadow Ridge Facility. Therefore, there is no suitable habitat for this species and this species is considered absent from the site. NESTING BIRDS The Project site and immediate surrounding area does contain habitat suitable for nesting birds. As such the Project is subject to the following nesting bird regulations. Migratory Bird Treaty Act The Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918. This Act implements four international conservation treaties that the U.S. entered into with Canada in 1916, Mexico in 1936, Japan in 1972, and Russia in 1976. It is intended to ensure the sustainability of populations of all protected migratory bird species. The Act has been amended with the signing of each treaty, as well as when any of the treaties were amended, such as with Mexico in 1976 and Canada in 1995. The Act prohibits the take (including killing, capturing, selling, trading, and transport) of protected migratory bird species without prior authorization by the Department of Interior U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Suitable habitat for nesting birds does exist on the property. 200 City of Palm Desert Shadow Ridge Project, PP 23-0023/VTTM 38866 SECTION 15183 ANALYSIS TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES Page 24 California Fish and Game Code The Project site is also subject to Sections 3503 and 3503.5 of the Fish and Game Code. Section 3503 states, “It is unlawful to take, possess, or needlessly destroy the nest or eggs of any bird, except as otherwise provided by this code or any regulation made pursuant thereto”. And Section 3503.5 states, “It is unlawful to take, possess, or destroy any birds in the orders Falconiformes or Strigiformes (birds-of-prey) or to take, possess, or destroy the nest or eggs of any such bird except as otherwise provided by this code or any regulation adopted pursuant thereto”. Suitable habitat for nesting birds exists on the property. JURISDICTIONAL WATERS Waters of the United States and Waters of the State The USACE has the authority to permit the discharge of dredged or fill material in Waters of the U.S. (WOUS) under Section 404 CWA. While the Regional Water Quality Board has authority over the discharge of dredged or fill material in Waters of the State under Section 401 CWA as well as the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act. The Project area was surveyed with 100 percent visual coverage and no drainage features were present on site that met the definition for WOUS. As such, the subject parcel does not contain any wetlands, Waters of the U.S., or Waters of the State. Fish and Game Code Section 1602 - State Lake and/or Streambed The CDFW asserts jurisdiction over any drainage feature that contains a definable bed and bank or associated riparian vegetation. The Project area was surveyed with 100 percent visual coverage and no definable bed or bank features exist on the project site. As such, the subject parcel does not contain any areas under CDFW jurisdiction. WETLANDS NWI maps did not identify portions within the Project site as a Riverine/Riparian system. Additionally, none of the requirements for wetland designation (hydric vegetation, hydric soils, and/or wetland hydrology) were present on site. As such, there are no wetlands currently present on the project site. CVMSHCP CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS The entire subject parcel falls within the boundaries of the CVMSHCP. However, the project site is not located within a Conservation Area (Figure 4 in Appendix A of Appendix 2). As such, there are no conservation requirements for the Project under the CVMSHCP. However, every Project completed within the boundaries of the CVMSHCP is required to pay a Development Impact Fee to the City or County, depending on location, prior to obtaining permits. Because the Project is within the boundaries of the CVMSHCP, it will be required to submit this fee to the City. The amount of the fee will be determined by the City. a. Less Than Significant Impact – Implementation of the project has a potential for a significant adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the CDFW or USFWS. The project site is vacant, containing very limited habitat that can support special status species. This habitat will be eliminated by the proposed project, but no special status species or supporting habitat exist on the project site that will be adversely impacted by the project’s implementation. The Biological Resources Assessment (BRA) provided as Appendix 2 to this Section 15183 analysis supports this finding. Therefore, under this issue a finding of less than significant adverse impact is appropriate. b. No Impact – According to the data gathered by Jennings Environmental (JE) in the BRA, no federally protected riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community occur within the project footprint. JE assessed the project site for the presence of any state and/or federal jurisdictional waters. The result of the jurisdictional waters assessment is that there are no riparian habitat or other sensitive habitats 201 City of Palm Desert Shadow Ridge Project, PP 23-0023/VTTM 38866 SECTION 15183 ANALYSIS TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES Page 25 located within the project site. Therefore, the project will not impact riparian or sensitive habitat. No mitigation is required. c. No Impact – According to the data gathered by JE in the BRA, no federally protected wetlands occur within the project footprint. JE assessed the project area of potential impact for the presence of any state and/or federal jurisdictional waters. The result of the jurisdictional waters assessment is that there are no wetland or non-wetland WOTUS or waters of the State potentially subject to regulation by the USACE under Section 404 of the CWA, the RWQCB under Section 401 of the CWA and/or Porter Cologne Water Quality Control Act, or the CDFW under Section 1602 of the FGC, respectively. Therefore, the project will not impact and jurisdictional waters and no state or federal jurisdictional waters permitting will be required. Thus, implementation of the proposed project will have no potential to impact any federally protected wetlands through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means. No mitigation is required. d. Less Than Significant Impact – Based on the field survey of the project site, the project will not substantially interfere with the movement of any native resident or migratory species or with established native or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native nursery sites. However, the State does protect all migratory and nesting native birds. Suitable habitat exists on the site to support bird nesting. Thus, the project area may include locations that function as nesting locations for native birds. To prevent interfering with native bird nesting (wildlife nursery), the project will comply with federal and state regulations regarding protection of nesting birds which is consistent with the General Plan Update EIR. e. No Impact – Please refer to the discussion under issue IV(a) above. Based on the field survey, the project footprint does not contain any biological resources that are protected by local policies or ordinances. Thus, there is no potential for significant adverse impacts to locally protected biological resources. Thus, impacts under this issue are considered less than significant with no mitigation required. f. Less Than Significant Impact - The entire subject parcel falls within the boundaries of the CVMSHCP. However, the project site is not located within a Conservation Area (Figure 4 in Appendix A of Appendix 2). As such, there are no conservation requirements for the Project under the CVMSHCP. However, every Project completed within the boundaries of the CVMSHCP is required to pay a Development Impact Fee to the City or County, depending on location, prior to obtaining permits. Because this Project is within the boundaries of the CVMSHCP, it will be required to submit this fee to the City consistent with the General Plan EIR. The amount of the fee will be determined by the City. With payment of this standard fee and implementation of regulations to protect nesting birds, the project’s contribution to cumulative impacts will be less than cumulatively considerable. The EIR determined that implementation of the General Plan would result in less than significant impacts to biological resources after implementation of mitigation measures. Mitigation Measure 4.5-1 (EIR p. 4.5- 24 to 4.5-25) was provided to reduce potential impacts to sensitive species and habitats by requiring applicants of future development projects that disturb undeveloped land to prepare and submit biological resources surveys and, as applicable, obtain permits and authorizations from relevant federal and state agencies to address and minimize potential project-related impacts on sensitive species and habitats, nesting birds (burrowing owl), jurisdictional waters, and wetlands. Based on a careful review of the 2016 data and the lack of any native biological resources on the project site, there are no sensitive biological resources and development of the modified project would have no adverse impact to such resources. The type and intensity of use proposed as part of the proposed project is consistent with the development anticipated, analyzed, and approved as part of the adopted General Plan Update and evaluated in the General Plan Update EIR. Thus, approval of the modified project does not result in any new significant impacts peculiar to the project or property, or in a substantial increase in the severity of the impacts evaluated in the EIR, or result in any offsite or cumulative impacts not discussed in the prior EIR that would render Section 15183 inapplicable to the project. 202 City of Palm Desert Shadow Ridge Project, PP 23-0023/VTTM 38866 SECTION 15183 ANALYSIS TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES Page 26 Cultural Resources Would the Project: General Plan EIR Findings General Plan EIR Findings: Project Conclusions: Equal or Less Severe New or Substantial Increase in Severity Applicable Standards and Regulations Resulting Level of Significance a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to Section 15064.5 LTS with MM  ☐ Mitigation Measures 4.4- 1 through -5 16 USC §470 et. seq. CEQA Health and Safety Code § 7050.5 Public Resources Code § 5097.5(a) California Code of Regulations § 4308 LTS with MM b) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries LTS  ☐ 16 USC §470 et. seq. CEQA American Indian Religious Freedom Act Native American Graves and Repatriation Act of 1990 Health and Safety Code § 7050.5 Public Resources Code § 5097.5(a) California Code of Regulations § 4308 LTS c) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource LTS with MM  ☐ Mitigation Measure 4.4- 7 LTS d) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource of site or unique geologic feature LTS with MM  ☐ Mitigation Measure 4.4- 8 through -11 LTS SUBSTANTIATION: The following information is provided based on a study titled “Cultural Resources Assessment for the Shadow Ridge Project, Tentative Tract Map (TTM) 28818-1, City of Palm Desert, Riverside County, California,” prepared by Mojave Archaeological Consulting, LLC dated November 2023 and provided as Appendix 3. Background 203 City of Palm Desert Shadow Ridge Project, PP 23-0023/VTTM 38866 SECTION 15183 ANALYSIS TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES Page 27 The General Plan Update EIR evaluated potential cultural resource impacts on a City-wide basis on pages 4.6-1 through 4.6-14. The same three issues identified above were evaluated and concluded to pose a less than significant impact on the City’s environment, including cumulative impacts, with implementation of four mitigation measures. Tribal Cultural Resources were also evaluated under this topic in the General Plan EIR, but TCR issues are evaluated separately within this Section 15183 analysis. The EIR Cultural Resources finding acknowledged that future development under the General Plan could adversely impact cultural resources located within the City boundary, but based on implementation of the General Plan update policies and programs, and compliance with the four General Plan mitigation measures, the impact of these potential changes to the environment would be less than significant. Project specific findings on these Cultural Resource issues are presented in the following evaluation. Report Summary Toll Brothers proposes to develop a 20.69-acre site for a residential gated community. The project site is located within Marriot’s 306-acre Shadow Ridge property. Toll Brothers plans to develop 93 single-family resort-oriented residences. The residences will each range in size from 2,216 square feet to 2,425 square feet and will be situated on variable sized lots that will be a minimum of 5,500 square feet if the City approves the Tentative Tract Map (VTTM 38866). In addition to the construction of 93 homes, the project will include the removal of an existing storage facility, road paving, storm drain and sidewalk installation, the construction of two open space lots that will serve as bioretention basins, and the installation of utilities and wastewater connections. The project site is in Coachella Valley, in the City of Palm Desert, southeast of Monterey Avenue and Gerald Fort Drive on the USGS Topo 7.5-minute map for Cathedral City, CA, within Section 32, Township 4 South, and Range 6 East. This report describes the methods and results of the cultural resources investigation of the project area, which included a records search and literature review, a Sacred Lands File (SLF) search with the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), and an intensive pedestrian survey of the 20.69-acre project site. The purpose of the investigation was to provide the City of Palm Desert with the information and analysis necessary to determine the potential for the proposed project to impact “historical resources” and “archaeological resources” under CEQA. The records search performed by the Eastern Information Center (EIC) of the California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS), included a 0.5-mile-wide buffer (study area), and indicated eight previous cultural resources investigations and no cultural resources are documented within the 0.5-mile study area. Of the previous investigations, none have covered any portion of the project site. No cultural resources have been previously documented within the 20.69-acre project site. The SLF search with the NAHC was completed with negative results. Mojave Archaeological Consulting conducted an intensive pedestrian survey of the project site on 20 November 2023. An Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians (ACBCI) Cultural Resources Analyst also participated in the field survey. No cultural resources, either historic or prehistoric, were located during the survey. The negative findings of the survey and the project area’s previously disturbed environmental setting indicate that buried archaeological deposits are unlikely. Considering these findings, Mojave Archaeological Consulting recommends to the City of Palm Desert that the proposed project will have no impact on historical or archaeological resources. No further cultural resources work or monitoring measures are recommended necessary for the proposed project activities. However, in the event that buried cultural materials are encountered during construction, all work should be halted in the vicinity of the discovery and a qualified archaeologist should be contacted to assess the significance and integrity of the find in accordance with standard measures for the treatment of human remains. If intact and significant archaeological remains are encountered, the impacts of the project should be mitigated appropriately and any such discoveries, and subsequent evaluation and treatment, should be documented in a cultural resources report. Additionally, Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5, CEQA Statute & Guidelines Section 15064.5(e), and PRC Section 5097.98 mandate the process to be followed in 204 City of Palm Desert Shadow Ridge Project, PP 23-0023/VTTM 38866 SECTION 15183 ANALYSIS TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES Page 28 the event of an accidental discovery of human remains. Finally, if the project area is expanded to include areas not covered by this survey or other recent cultural resource assessments in the study area, additional cultural resource investigations may be required. a&b. Less Than Significant Impact – CEQA establishes that "a project that may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource is a project that may have a significant effect on the environment" (PRC §21084.1). "Substantial adverse change," according to PRC §5020.1(q), "means demolition, destruction, relocation, or alteration such that the significance of a historical resource would be impaired." Per the above discussion and definition, no historical or archaeological sites or isolates were recorded within the project boundaries; thus, none of them requires further consideration during this study. The resort exists and the property has been disturbed. In light of this information and pursuant to PRC §21084.1, the following conclusions have been reached for the project: • No historical resources or archaeological resources within or adjacent to the project area have any potential to be disturbed as they are not within the proposed area in which the facilities will be constructed and developed, and thus, the project as it is currently proposed will not cause a substantial adverse change to any known historical resources. • No further cultural resources investigation is necessary for the proposed project unless construction plans undergo such changes as to include areas not covered by this study. However, since demolition and earth moving activities are required to support the proposed project, General Plan EIR mitigation measure, MM 4.6-2d would be incorporated into the project. The potential for impacts to cultural resources from implementation of the proposed Project are less than significant. No additional mitigation is required. c. Less Than Significant Impact – As noted in the discussion above, no available information suggests that human remains may occur within the Area of Potential Effect (APE) and the potential for such an occurrence is considered very low. Human remains discovered during the project will need to be treated in accordance with the provisions of HSC §7050.5 and PRC §5097.98, which is mandatory. State law (Section 7050.5 of the Health and Safety Code) as well as local laws requires that the Sheriff’s Station, County Sheriff and Coroner’s Office receive notification if human remains are encountered. Compliance with these laws is considered adequate mitigation for potential impacts, and as such the potential for impact to discovery and treatment of human remains would be less than significant level. The project would not result in any new significant impacts or in a substantial increase in the severity of biological resource impacts identified in the General Plan EIR and no further review is required. Thus, the proposed modified project represents a comparable condition relative to the previous findings for cultural resource impacts when compared to the original EIR evaluation. Approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map 38866 does not result in any new significant impacts peculiar to the project or property, a substantial increase in the severity of the impacts evaluated in the EIR, or potentially significant off-site or cumulative impacts that would render Section 15183 inapplicable to the project. Geology and Soils Would the Project: General Plan EIR Findings General Plan EIR Findings: Project Conclusions: Equal or Less Severe New or Substantial Increase in Severity Applicable Standards and Requirements Resulting Level of Significance 205 City of Palm Desert Shadow Ridge Project, PP 23-0023/VTTM 38866 SECTION 15183 ANALYSIS TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES Page 29 a) Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury or death, involving: i. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault ii. Strong seismic ground shaking iii. seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction iv. Landslides LTS  ☐ California Building Code Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act Seismic Hazards Mapping Act National Hazards Disclosure Act LTS with MM b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? LTS  ☐ California Building Code National Hazards Disclosure Act LTS with MM c) be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence , liquefaction or collapse? LTS  ☐ California Building Code National Hazards Disclosure Act LTS with MM d) Be located on expansive soil as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), or other soils conditions creating substantial direct or indirect risks to life or property? LTS  ☐ California Building Code National Hazards Disclosure Act LTS with MM e) Have soils that are incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? No Impact  ☐ - No Impact SUBSTANTIATION: The following information is provided based on a study titled “Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Report for the Proposed Shadow Ridge Residential Development, Tract 14670 City of Palm Desert, California” prepared by LGC Valley, Inc. Geotechnical Consulting dated November 10, 2023 and provided as Appendix 4. Background The General Plan Update EIR evaluated potential geology and soil resource impacts on a City-wide basis on pages 4.7-1 through 4.6-12. The same six issues identified above were evaluated and concluded to pose a less than significant impact on the City’s environment, including cumulative impacts, with no required General Plan mitigation measures. The General Plan identified several policies and programs in place to control Geology and Soil potential adverse impacts. These include the California Building Code, Palm Desert Municipal Code (Section 25.28.110 and Chapter 24.20); requirements to obtain geotechnical investigations within Zones of Required Investigation and implement site specific mitigation; the City’s Municipal Code and General Plan Policies address certain geology and soil issues; Stormwater Management is addressed by Chapter 24.20 of the Municipal Code; and use of site-specific paleontological 206 City of Palm Desert Shadow Ridge Project, PP 23-0023/VTTM 38866 SECTION 15183 ANALYSIS TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES Page 30 studies with mitigation identified. Based on these General Plan and existing City programs, the General Plan EIR concluded that all potential geology and soil impacts, including cumulative impacts, will be less than significant without General Plan mitigation measures and the Project would not result in a new significant impact or in a substantial increase in the severity of geology and soils impacts. Project specific findings on these Geology and Soil are presented in the following evaluation. a. (i) Ground Rupture No Impact – Based on a review of published geologic maps, the geotechnical report concluded that the subject site is not located within an Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone (Hart and Bryant, 1997) and no active faults are mapped projecting through the subject site. The possibility of damage due to ground rupture from earthquake fault rupture is considered very low since active faults are not known to cross the site. (ii) Strong Seismic Ground Shaking Less Than Significant Impact– The following findings were reached in Appendix 4 regarding seismic groundshaking. The maximum probable earthquake is the maximum earthquake likely to occur given the known tectonic framework at the site. The San Andreas Fault is located approximately four miles northeast of the site and is considered to have the most significant effect at the site. Section 1803.5.12 of the 2022 California Building Code (CBC) states that the maximum considered earthquake geometric mean (MCEg) Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) should be used for geotechnical evaluations. The PGAm for the site is equal to 0823 g. A deaggregation of the PGA based on a 2,475-year return period indicates that an earthquake magnitude of 7.49 at a distance of approximately 4.7 miles from the site would contribute the most to this ground motion. The City will require the project be developed in accordance with the measures outlined in Chapter 4 of the Geotechnical Report. (iii) Seismic-related Ground Failure Including Liquefaction Less Than Significant Impact – Based on the finding in the Geotechnical Report (Appendix 4), the site is not exposed to significant liquefaction potential due to the depth of the groundwater table. As such and based on the site assessment, liquefaction potential is considered very low to nil. (iv) Landslides No Impact – Based on the relatively flat nature of the site and the Geotechnical Reports review of the geologic literature pertinent to the site, there are no indications of landslides close to or within the limits of the site. b. Less Than Significant Impact – The project site is vacant with disturbed, non-native vegetation coverage; the site has been historically vacant and undeveloped. City grading standards, best management practices and the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) are required to control the potentially significant erosion hazards from disturbing the site from construction through future occupancy. The topography is generally level with a shallow slope from north to south. During project construction when soils are exposed, a potential for temporary soil erosion may occur, but project grading would be managed through the preparation and implementation of a SWPPP during construction. A WQMP will be required to implement best management practices to achieve concurrent water quality controls after construction is completed and the project is occupied. As a result, TTM 22818-1 would not cause substantial soil erosion or sedimentation. 207 City of Palm Desert Shadow Ridge Project, PP 23-0023/VTTM 38866 SECTION 15183 ANALYSIS TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES Page 31 c. Less Than Significant Impact – The geotechnical study determined that the project site would not be subject to landslides, liquefaction or collapse based on the site geology. The site will experience some limited subsidence, but the amount of differential subsidence was concluded to be a less than significant impact. Based on these data, overall soil or geologic instability will be less than significant. d. No Impact – The geotechnical study determined that the project site soil and alluvium contain no expansive material. Thus, there is no potential adverse impact. e. No Impact – The proposed project will collect and deliver municipal wastewater to a Wastewater Treatment Plant. Thus, there is no potential adverse impact to soils from use of septic tanks or alternative subsurface wastewater disposal systems. f. Less Than Significant Impact ‒ The potential for discovering paleontological resources during development of the project is considered low based on the young alluvial sediments underlying the project site. No unique geologic features are known or suspected to occur on or beneath the site. However, because paleontological resources are located beneath the surface and can only be discovered as a result of ground disturbance activities. Management of any paleontological resources will occur in accordance with City General Plan goals and policies which are protective of such resources. The impact is less than significant. No additional mitigation is required. The level of potential geology and soil impacts for this project are fully consistent with the findings of the General Plan EIR and no further review is required. Based on the preceding findings, the proposed modified project will not contribute to new or greater geology or soil impacts to human beings. The type and intensity of use proposed as part of the proposed project is consistent with the development anticipated, analyzed, and approved as part of the adopted General Plan Update and evaluated in the General Plan Update EIR. Approval of Tentative Tract Map Vesting 38866 does not result in any new significant impacts peculiar to the project or property, a substantial increase in the severity of direct or indirect geology and soil impacts to humans evaluated in the 2016 EIR, or any new offsite or cumulative impacts that would render Section 15183 inapplicable to the project. Greenhouse Gas Emissions Would the Project: General Plan EIR Findings General Plan EIR Findings: Project Conclusions: Equal or Less Severe New or Substantial Increase in Severity Applicable Standards and Regulations Resulting Level of Significance a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? LTS  ☐ - LTS b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? LTS  ☐ - LTS SUBSTANTIATION: The following information is provided based on a study titled “Shadow Ridge Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas & Energy Assessment,” prepared by Urban Crossroads dated January 18, 2024 and provided as Appendix 1 to this Section 15183 analysis. Background 208 City of Palm Desert Shadow Ridge Project, PP 23-0023/VTTM 38866 SECTION 15183 ANALYSIS TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES Page 32 The General Plan Update EIR evaluated potential Greenhouse Gas impacts on a City-wide basis on pages 4.4-1 through 4.4.28. The same two issues identified above were evaluated and concluded to pose a less than significant impact on the City’s environment, including cumulative impacts, without mitigation. This finding acknowledged that future development under the General Plan would alter the existing GHG emissions from future development within the City, and based on the detailed analysis in the General Plan EIR, concluded that GHG impacts would be significant and unavoidable. No mitigation measures were identified because the City incorporated the mitigation into an extensive set of General Plan Policies. Based on implementation of the General Plan Update policies and programs, compliance with the Palm Desert Municipal Code, and compliance with South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Rules and Regulations, the impact of these potential future emissions would remain significant. Regarding conflicts with plans and policies, the integration and implementation of the policies in the General Plan Update ensures that the Plan can be implemented consistent with the General Plan. Project specific findings regarding greenhouse gas emissions are presented in the following evaluation. Greenhouse Gas (GHG) History Global climate change (GCC) is the change in average meteorological conditions on the earth with respect to temperature, precipitation, and storms. The majority of scientists believe that the climate shift taking place since the Industrial Revolution is occurring at a quicker rate and magnitude than in the past. Scientific evidence suggests that GCC is the result of increased concentrations of GHGs in the earth’s atmosphere, including carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), and fluorinated gases. The majority of scientists believe that this increased rate of climate change is the result of GHGs resulting from human activity and industrialization over the past 200 years. An individual project like the proposed Project evaluated in this memo cannot generate enough GHG emissions to affect a discernible change in global climate. However, the proposed Project may participate in the potential for GCC by its incremental contribution of GHGs combined with the cumulative increase of all other sources of GHGs, which when taken together constitute potential influences on GCC. Because these changes may have serious environmental consequences, this Section 15183 analysis will evaluate the potential for the proposed Project to have a significant effect upon the environment as a result of its potential contribution to the greenhouse effect. GCC refers to the change in average meteorological conditions on the earth with respect to temperature, wind patterns, precipitation and storms. Global temperatures are regulated by naturally occurring atmospheric gases such as water vapor, CO2, N2O, CH4, hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6). These particular gases are important due to their residence time (duration they stay) in the atmosphere, which ranges from 10 years to more than 100 years. These gases allow solar radiation into the earth’s atmosphere, but prevent radiative heat from escaping, thus warming the earth’s atmosphere. GCC can occur naturally as it has in the past with the previous ice ages. Gases that trap heat in the atmosphere are often referred to as GHGs. GHGs are released into the atmosphere by both natural and anthropogenic activity. Without the natural GHG effect, the earth’s average temperature would be approximately 61 degrees Fahrenheit (°F) cooler than it is currently. The cumulative accumulation of these gases in the earth’s atmosphere is considered to be the cause for the observed increase in the earth’s temperature. For the purposes of this analysis, emissions of CO2, CH4, and N2O were evaluated because these gases are the primary contributors to GCC from development projects. Although there are other substances such as fluorinated gases that also contribute to GCC, these fluorinated gases were not evaluated as their sources are not well-defined and do not contain accepted emissions factors or methodology to accurately calculate these gases. Appendix 1 contains a discussion of the various regulations that affect greenhouse gas management. Please refer to Appendix 1 for a discussion of these regulations. However, the discussion of local, 209 City of Palm Desert Shadow Ridge Project, PP 23-0023/VTTM 38866 SECTION 15183 ANALYSIS TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES Page 33 SCAQMD, management considerations govern the determination of significance for GHG emissions and it is repeated here to guide reviewers in the analytical approach for this issue. SCAQMD is the agency responsible for air quality planning and regulation in the SSAB. The SCAQMD addresses the impacts to climate change of projects subject to SCAQMD permit as a lead agency if they are the only agency having discretionary approval for the project and acts as a responsible agency when a land use agency must also approve discretionary permits for the project. The SCAQMD acts as an expert commenting agency for impacts to air quality. This expertise carries over to GHG emissions, so the agency helps local land use agencies through the development of models and emission thresholds that can be used to address GHG emissions. In 2008, SCAQMD formed a Working Group to identify GHG emissions thresholds for land use projects that could be used by local lead agencies in the SSAB. The Working Group developed several different options that are contained in the SCAQMD Draft Guidance Document – Interim CEQA GHG Significance Threshold, that could be applied by lead agencies. The working group has not provided additional guidance since release of the interim guidance in 2008. The SCAQMD Board has not approved the thresholds; however, the Guidance Document provides substantial evidence supporting the approaches to significance of GHG emissions that can be considered by the lead agency in adopting its own threshold. The current interim thresholds consist of the following tiered approach: • Tier 1 consists of evaluating whether or not the project qualifies for any applicable exemption under CEQA. • Tier 2 consists of determining whether the project is consistent with a GHG reduction plan. If a project is consistent with a qualifying local GHG reduction plan, it does not have significant GHG emissions. • Tier 3 consists of screening values, which the lead agency can choose, but must be consistent with all projects within its jurisdiction. A project’s construction emissions are averaged over 30 years and are added to the project’s operational emissions. If a project’s emissions are below one of the following screening thresholds, then the project is less than significant: o Residential and commercial land use: 3,000 metric ton of CO2 equivalent (MTCO2e/yr) o Industrial land use: 10,000 MTCO2e/yr o Based on land use type: residential: 3,500 MTCO2e/yr; commercial: 1,400 MTCO2e/yr; or mixed use: 3,000 MTCO2e/yr • Tier 4 has the following options: o Option 1: Reduce Business-as-Usual (BAU) emissions by a certain percentage; this percentage is currently undefined. o Option 2: Early implementation of applicable AB 32 Scoping Plan measures o Option 3: 2020 target for service populations (SP), which includes residents and employees: 4.8 MTCO2e per SP per year for projects and 6.6 MTCO2e per SP per year for plans; o Option 3, 2035 target: 3.0 MTCO2e per SP per year for projects and 4.1 MTCO2e per SP per year for plans • Tier 5 involves mitigation offsets to achieve target significance threshold. The SCAQMD’s interim thresholds used the Executive Order S-3-05-year 2050 goal as the basis for the Tier 3 screening level. Achieving the Executive Order’s objective would contribute to worldwide efforts to cap CO2 concentrations at 450 ppm, thus stabilizing global climate. SCAQMD only has authority over GHG emissions from development projects that include air quality permits. At this time, it is unknown if the project would include stationary sources of emissions subject to SCAQMD permits. Notwithstanding, if the Project requires a stationary permit, it would be subject to the applicable SCAQMD regulations. SCAQMD Regulation XXVII, adopted in 2009 includes the following rules: 210 City of Palm Desert Shadow Ridge Project, PP 23-0023/VTTM 38866 SECTION 15183 ANALYSIS TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES Page 34 • Rule 2700 defines terms and post global warming potentials. • Rule 2701, Southern California (SoCal) Climate Solutions Exchange, establishes a voluntary program to encourage, quantify, and certify voluntary, high quality certified GHG emission reductions in the SCAQMD. • Rule 2702, GHG Reduction Program created a program to produce GHG emission reductions within the SCAQMD. The SCAQMD will fund projects through contracts in response to requests for proposals or purchase reductions from other parties. Thus, for purposes of this analysis, if Project-related GHG emissions do not exceed the 3,000 MTCO2e per year threshold, then Project-related GHG emissions would clearly have a less-than-significant impact pursuant to Threshold GHG-1. On the other hand, if Project-related GHG emissions exceed 3,000 MTCO2e per year, the Project would be considered a substantial source of GHG emissions. a. Less Than Significant Impact – The estimated GHG emissions for the Project are summarized on Table VIII-1. The estimated GHG emissions include emissions from Carbon Dioxide (CO2), Methane (CH4), Nitrous Oxide (N2O), and Refrigerants (R). As shown on Table III-1, the Project would generate a total of approximately 1,832.76 MTCO2e/yr. More importantly, the proposed Project (93 residential units) will generate substantially less emissions than the 324 units that were previously approved for the project site, an estimated 70 percent less than the time-shared units. Table VIII-1 TOTAL PROJECT GHG EMISSIONS Source Emission (lbs/day) CO2 CH4 N20 R Total CO2E Annual construction-related emissions amortized over 30 years 18.72 4.72E-04 9.47E-04 1.44E-02 19.03 Mobile Source 1409.43 0.05 0.06 1.65 1431.49 Area Source 21.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 21.61 Energy Source 311.89 0.03 0.00 0.00 313.17 Water 16.64 0.12 0.00 0.00 20.68 Waste 7.59 0.76 0.00 0.00 26.55 Refrigerants 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 Total CO2e (All Sources) 1,832.76 A numerical threshold for determining the significance of GHG emissions in the SSAB has not been established by the SCAQMD for projects where it is not the lead agency. As an interim threshold based on guidance provided in the CAPCOA CEQA and Climate Change handbook, the City has opted to use a non-zero threshold approach based on Approach 2 of the handbook. Threshold 2.5 (Unit-Based Thresholds Based on Market Capture) establishes a numerical threshold based on capture of approximately 90% of emissions from future development. The latest threshold developed by SCAQMD using this method is 3,000 MTCO2e/yr for all projects. The Project would result in approximately 1,832.76 MTCO2e/yr; the proposed Project would not exceed the SCAQMD’s numeric threshold of 3,000 MTCO2e/yr. Thus, the Project would result in a less than significant impact with respect to GHG emissions, and it would not cause a substantially greater impact compared to the approved resort project and the analysis reflected in the General Plan EIR. This finding is based on the fact that the General Plan incorporated GHG emissions from the 324-unit project, and the proposed Project reduces the City’s GHG emissions relative to the forecast within the General Plan EIR. Appendix 1 also contains a comparative evaluation of the proposed project (93 single-family residences) with the approved project (324 timeshare units) regarding GHG emissions and the 211 City of Palm Desert Shadow Ridge Project, PP 23-0023/VTTM 38866 SECTION 15183 ANALYSIS TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES Page 35 comparative data are provided in Table 11 and 12 of the Appendix. The proposed project will generate substantially less GHG emissions than the existing approved project for the site. b. Less Than Significant Impact – Pursuant to 15604.4 of the CEQA Guidelines, a lead agency may rely on qualitative analysis or performance-based standards to determine the significance of impacts from GHG emissions. In November 2022, CARB released the Final 2022 Scoping Plan Update, which identifies the State’s progress towards the statutory 2030 target, while providing a path towards carbon neutrality and reduce greenhouse gases emissions by 85% below 1990 levels by 2045. Recent studies show that the State’s existing and proposed regulatory framework will allow the State to reduce its GHG emissions level to 40% below 1990 levels by 2030. The Project would not conflict with any of the 2022 Scoping Plan elements as any regulations adopted would apply directly or indirectly to the Project. Finally, the Project is consistent with the general plan land use designation, density, building intensity, and applicable policies specified for the Project area in SCAG's Sustainable Community Strategy/ Regional Transportation Plan, which pursuant to SB 375 calls for the integration of transportation, land-use and housing policies to plan for achievement of the GHG-emissions target for the region. Thus, a less than significant impact related to GHG emissions from Project construction and operation would occur and because it no mitigation is required, the impact is less than significant and the Project would not result in a new significant impact or in a substantial increase in the severity of GHG impacts. The type and intensity of use proposed as part of the proposed project is consistent with the development anticipated, analyzed, and approved as part of the adopted General Plan Update and evaluated in the General Plan Update EIR. Approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map 38866 does not result in any new significant impacts peculiar to the project or property, result in a substantial increase in the severity of the GHG impacts evaluated in the 2016 EIR, or result in any new offsite or cumulative impacts that were not identified in the EIR, that would render Section 15183 inapplicable to the project. Hazards and Hazardous Materials Would the Project: General Plan EIR Findings General Plan EIR Findings: Project Conclusions: Equal or Less Severe New or Substantial Increase in Severity Applicable Standards and Requirements Equal or Less Severe a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials LTS  ☐ Federal Hazardous Materials Transport Act Federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act California Building Code LTS 212 City of Palm Desert Shadow Ridge Project, PP 23-0023/VTTM 38866 SECTION 15183 ANALYSIS TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES Page 36 b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment LTS with MM  ☐ Federal Hazardous Materials Transport Act RCRA Federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act California Building Code LTS c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school LTS  ☐ Federal Hazardous Materials Transport Act RCRA Federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act California Building Code LTS d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment LTS with MM  ☐ Federal Hazardous Materials Transport Act RCRA Federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act California Building Code LTS with PR e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area No Impact  ☐ - No Impact f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, result in a safety No Impact  ☐ - No Impact 213 City of Palm Desert Shadow Ridge Project, PP 23-0023/VTTM 38866 SECTION 15183 ANALYSIS TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES Page 37 hazard for people residing or working in the project area g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan LTS  ☐ Federal Hazardous Materials Transport Act LTS with PR h) Expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires LTS with MM  ☐ California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection Strategic Plan California Building Code California Fire Code LTS with PR i) Due to the geography of the area, there would be inadequate two-way radio system coverage for public health and safety agencies LTS with MM  ☐ - LTS with PR j) The likelihood that the Valley Fever fungus may be present increases with the number of the above factors applicable to the project site LTS with MM  ☐ - LTS with PR SUBSTANTIATION: The following information is provided based on a study titled “Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Shadow Ridge Road, Palm Desert, California,” prepared by Hillman Consulting, dated October 2023 and provided as Appendix 5. Background The General Plan Update EIR evaluated potential Hazards and Hazardous Material impacts on a City-wide basis on pages 4.8-1 through 4.8.18. The same seven issues identified above were evaluated and concluded to pose either no impact or a less than significant impact on the City’s environment, including cumulative impacts, without mitigation. Based on a review of the various data bases, the City does not have any known areas of contamination. The analysis in the General Plan EIR also assumed that all future and existing development in the Planning Area complies with applicable laws, regulations, design standards, and plans. This finding acknowledged that future development under the General Plan would result in an increase in the transport, use and disposal from future development within the City, and based on the detailed analysis in the General Plan EIR, concluded that based on implementation of federal and state rules and regulations for handling hazardous materials and wastes and City General Plan policies no mitigation measures would be required. Based on implementation of the General Plan Update policies and programs and enforcement of existing federal and state programs, the impact of these potential future handlers of hazardous materials and wastes would remain a less than significant impact. Regarding wildfire hazards, more people are likely to be exposed to wildfire hazards, but the integration and implementation of the policies in the General Plan Update ensures that wildfire hazards can be controlled to a less than significant impact. Project specific findings on these hazardous materials issues are presented in the following evaluation. Project-Specific Summary 214 City of Palm Desert Shadow Ridge Project, PP 23-0023/VTTM 38866 SECTION 15183 ANALYSIS TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES Page 38 Hillman Consulting performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment in accordance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Practice E 1527-21 for the Shadow Ridge Project site. The assessment has revealed no recognized environmental conditions (RECs), controlled recognized environmental conditions (CRECs) or significant data gaps (SDGs) in connection with the project site. In summary, the following findings were reached: • No RECS were identified. • No CRECs Were identified • No SDGs were identified • No historical RECS were identified on the site. Based on the preceding findings, Hillman Consulting concluded that no additional environmental actions, remediations, or investigations are warranted. Hillman Consulting determined the site to be environmentally suitable for Toll Brothers planned residential development. Residential development would result in less impacts that resort development. a. Less Than Significant Impact – The proposed project includes onsite activities that will need the routine transport of hazardous materials, such as vehicle and emergency generator fuel, and other chemicals used for landscape management. During future occupancy, the small quantities of household hazardous waste do not pose a significant impact to people or the environment for release into the environment in an uncontrolled manner. The project’s mandatory Storm Water Pollution Prevent Plan (SWPPP) and Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) ensure that no unremediated contamination will be created at the project site. b. Less Than Significant Impact – The proposed project may create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment during construction. The proposed project will involve site grading and building construction that will require some use of heavy equipment during construction. Thus, without the implementation of standard practices implemented for the management of hazardous materials through the SWPPP or erosion control plan during construction there is a potential for accidental release of petroleum products in sufficient quantity to pose a significant hazard to people and the environment. The following standard measure is incorporated into the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) prepared for the project to assure that the project complies with the General Order. All accidental spills or discharge of hazardous material during construction and future operating activities greater than a few gallons will be handled in compliance with applicable federal, State, and local regulations regarding cleanup and disposal of the contaminant released. The contaminated waste will be collected and disposed of at a licensed disposal or treatment facility in accordance with the SWPPP or Erosion Control Plan. During future occupancy the volume of hazardous materials maintained by future residents will be household quantities that do not generally pose a significant hazard to the environmental or humans when used properly, i.e., in accordance with label on containers. c. Less Than Significant Impact ‒ The project site is not located within one-quarter mile of any public school. The project is adjacent to a golf course and surrounding single-family residential uses, including time-share units. The proposed project is not anticipated to store large quantities of hazardous materials or wastes or emit hazardous emissions. No handling of acutely hazardous materials is anticipated. Based on this information, implementation of the project will not emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school. Impacts under this issue are considered less than significant. No mitigation is required. d. No Impact – The project site has been previously disturbed and continues to support operations that currently support golf course operations. The proposed development will include mass grading of the project site to provide level surfaces upon which to install the new residential structures. The 215 City of Palm Desert Shadow Ridge Project, PP 23-0023/VTTM 38866 SECTION 15183 ANALYSIS TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES Page 39 project will not be located on a site that is included on a list of hazardous materials sites that are currently under remediation. According to the Phase I ESA report finding, which provides information regarding Leaking Underground Storage Tanks (LUST) and Department of Toxic Substance Control (DTSC) cleanup sites (refer to Figure IX-1)), there are no open historic RECs on the property. Therefore, there is a low potential for the project to encounter contaminated locations at the project site. Project construction and operation of the site to support residential uses will have a less than significant potential to create a significant hazard to the area population, onsite employees, or to the environment from its implementation under this issue. No mitigation is required. e. Less Than Significant Impact ‒ The project site is located over five miles from the Palm Springs and Bermuda Dunes Airports. The project site is located totally outside of the any overlay hazard area associated with either Airport. Given that the proposed project is located outside of any Airport influence area, the potential for the project to result in a safety hazard for people working in the project area is negligible. Therefore, construction and operation of the project at this location would result in less than significant potential safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area as a result of proximity to a public airport or private airstrip. No mitigation is required. f. Less Than Significant Impact – The proposed project has a minimal potential to interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. The nearest emergency evacuation routes are Monterey Avenue, Fred Waring Drive and Interstate-10. The proposed project will be constructed entirely within the boundaries of the project site and Shadow Ridge Road, with most improvements on the adjacent roadway. Due to the limited volume of traffic maintenance of access to the existing developed areas should not require a construction traffic management plan. g. Less Than Significant Impact – The project site contains a limited fuel load and the potential wildland fire hazard is identified as being moderate to low. The proposed project is required to, and will incorporate, the most current fire protection designs to support the City’s requirements, including an adequate water supply for fire flow and fighting purposes. Given the type of project proposed and ready access to emergency evacuation routes, exposure to wildfire would have a limited potential to substantially damage human or man-made equipment (vehicles) as they could be removed from the area prior to or during a wildfire. As a result, the potential for loss of life and structures is considered to be a less than significant impact without mitigation. The site-specific findings are consistent with the finding within the General Plan EIR and the proposed project will be reduced in size and scope relative to the resort use considered in the General Plan EIR. Thus, a less than significant impact related to hazards from Project construction and operation would occur. The impact is less than significant and the Project would not result in a new significant impact or in a substantial increase in the severity of hazard related impacts. The type and intensity of use proposed as part of the proposed project is consistent with the development anticipated, analyzed, and approved as part of the adopted General Plan Update and evaluated in the General Plan Update EIR. Thus, approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map 38866 does not result in any new significant impacts peculiar to the project or property, in a substantial increase in the severity of hazard impacts to humans evaluated in the 2016 EIR, or significant new offsite or cumulative impacts that would render Section 15183 inapplicable to the project. Hydrology and Water Quality 216 City of Palm Desert Shadow Ridge Project, PP 23-0023/VTTM 38866 SECTION 15183 ANALYSIS TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES Page 40 Would the Project: General Plan 2040 EIR Findings General Plan 2040 EIR Findings: Project Conclusions: Equal or Less Severe New or Substantial Increase in Severity Applicable Standards and Requirements Resulting Level of Significance a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or groundwater quality. LTS  ☐ CWC § 13000 et seq. SWRCB Construction General Permit Coachella Valley Regional Stormwater Permit LTS b) Substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin LTS  ☐ CWC § 13000 et seq. California Water Conservation Act of 2009 SVMC Chapter 11.54 SVMC Chapter 16.71 Coachella Valley Water Quality Management Plan LTS c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation, substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding, create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems; or impede or redirect flood flows LTS  ☐ CWC § 13000 et seq. SWRCB Construction General Permit Coachella Valley Regional Stormwater Permit LTS with PR d) In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk release of pollutants due to project inundation No Impact  ☐ - No Impact e) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan LTS  ☐ - LTS SUBSTANTIATION: The following information is provided based on a study titled “Project Specific Water Quality Management Plan, For Vesting Tentative Tract 38866,” prepared by Wilson Mikami Corporation, dated October 2023 and provided as Appendix 6. Background 217 City of Palm Desert Shadow Ridge Project, PP 23-0023/VTTM 38866 SECTION 15183 ANALYSIS TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES Page 41 The General Plan Update EIR evaluated potential Hydrology and Water Quality impacts on a City-wide basis on pages ________. The same 10 issues identified above were evaluated and concluded to pose either no impact or a less than significant impact on the City’s environment, including cumulative impacts, without mitigation. This finding acknowledged that future development under the General Plan would result in an increase in impervious surfaces and potential conflict with exposure to significant flood hazards. Based on implementation of the General Plan Update policies and programs and enforcement of existing rules, regulations and enforcement of grading, erosion control and flood control regulations, the impact of these potential future hydrology and water quality impacts would remain a less than significant impact. Project specific findings on these hydrology and water quality issues are presented in the following evaluation. a. Less Than Significant Impact – The proposed project is located within a developed area within the Whitewater River watershed, which is within the Colorado River Regional Water Quality Control Board’s (RWQCB) jurisdiction. The Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) is responsible for the water supply to the City of Palm Desert. CVWD currently pumps potable water supplies from groundwater in the Indio Subbasin of the Coachella Valley and purchases water from the State Water Project and Colorado River to meet water demand within its service area, when available. CVWD is required to meet potable water quality requirements of the Division of Drinking Water, State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB), as well as the California Department of Public Health. Typically, the three main sources of potential violation of water quality standards or waste discharge requirements are from generation of municipal wastewater, generation of stormwater runoff, and potential random discharges of pollutants, such as accidental spills. Municipal wastewater is delivered to CVWD’s Water Reclamation Plant No. 10 (Cook Street), through the CVWD’s sewer collection system within the City of Palm Desert. Plant No. 10 treats about 15 million gallons of wastewater per day (MDG) and currently meets the RWQCB waste discharge requirements. To address stormwater and accidental spills within this environment, any new project must ensure that site development implements a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP). These Plans implement Best Management Practices (BMPs) that control potential sources of water pollution in stormwater runoff that could violate any standards or discharge requirements during construction (short term) and future occupancy (long term). Implementation of the project specific BMPs through the SWPPP and WQMP can ensure that project-related after development surface runoff meets discharge requirements over the short- and long-term. Appendix 6 provides the WQMP required under the Phase II Small MS4 General Permit for the Coachella Valley. The WQMP provided specific stormwater runoff permit BMPs requirements for capturing, retaining, and treating on site stormwater (in two bioretention basins) once the residential subdivision has been developed. Because the project site currently consists of pervious surfaces, the project has identified onsite drainage that will generally be directed to the two onsite bioretention basins that will be installed to handle the two-year 24-hour storm event and mitigate the difference between the Pre- and Post- 100-year volume of stormwater runoff. The WQMP prepared for the project includes measures to minimize urban runoff from impacting receiving waters to the Maximum Extent Practicable (MEP). This is a requirement of the County and City, which enforces the RWQCB’s measure to protect the watershed. These measures include development of two bioretention basins that will collect and treat runoff generated within the project site to further accommodate surface runoff to avoid impacts to receiving waters. The SWPPP specifies the BMPs that the project will implement during construction activities to ensure that all potential water pollutants of concern are prevented, minimized, and/or otherwise appropriately treated prior to being discharged from the subject property in accordance with NPDES requirements. With implementation of these mandatory plans and their BMPs, and the measures 218 City of Palm Desert Shadow Ridge Project, PP 23-0023/VTTM 38866 SECTION 15183 ANALYSIS TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES Page 42 described above, the development of the PP23-0023/VTTM 38866 Project is not forecast to cause a violation of any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements, and there are no new significant or substantially greater water quality impacts. b. Less Than Significant Impact – Implementation of the proposed project will not substantially deplete groundwater supplies that would substantially affect the water availability for existing or planned land uses or biological resources. Given that the project does not require extensive excavation, the potential to intercept groundwater during grading of both the project site and utility infrastructure alignments is considered to be less than significant. The groundwater basin would not be physically altered or impacted as a result of the proposed project. The design of the drainage and retention facilities of the proposed project would offset much of the loss of the existing pervious surface at the site. The PP23-0023/VTTM 38866 Project is a single-family residential project that will consist of 93 new single-family residences. The project would be supplied with water by CVWD that uses groundwater in Coachella Valley and purchases water from Metropolitan Water District of Southern California to offset any potential overdraft due to its water supply activities. As outlined in the Utilities section of this document, the CVWD’s 2020 Coachella Valley Regional Urban Water Management Plan (2021) identifies sufficient water resources to meet demand in its service area under current and future conditions, including during extended drought. The anticipated available water supply within CVWD’s service area is anticipated to be greater than the regional demand for water in the future, which indicates that CVWD has available capacity to serve the proposed project without significant adverse impacts on area groundwater basins. While the development of the project may result in a slight reduction in the amount of surface runoff recharge associated with natural runoff, this reduction is expected to be substantially off-set/replaced by infiltration from the onsite bioretention basins. The development of the project will, therefore, not substantially interrupt the existing percolation of the site, or any flow of groundwater under the project site. Impacts to groundwater resources are forecast to be less than significant from implementing the PP23-0023/VTTM 38866 Project. Also, note that the 93 proposed residences will consume less water that the 324 Time share units approved under a prior entitlement. No mitigation is required. c i. Result in substantial erosion or siltation onsite or offsite? Less Than Significant Impact – Based on the WQMP provided in Appendix 6, the proposed project is not anticipated to significantly change the volume of flows downstream of the project site, and would not be anticipated to change the amount of surface water in any water body in an amount that could initiate a new cycle of erosion or sedimentation downstream of the project site. The onsite drainage system is designed to capture the forecast incremental increase in runoff from the project site associated with project development. Onsite flows will be captured in the proposed onsite biofiltration basins. If discharged, treated surface runoff will be discharged in conformance with County and City requirements to the adjacent open space on the Golf Course. Thus, the downstream drainage system will not be substantially altered given the control of future surface runoff from the project site; the potential for downstream erosion or sedimentation will be controlled to a less than significant impact level. ii. Substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding onsite or offsite? Less Than Significant Impact – The proposed project will not alter the existing drainage discharged downstream of the project site. The drainage patterns onsite will be modified to capture stormwater runoff but will maintain the existing offsite downstream drainage system on the Golf Course through control of future discharges from the site, which would prevent flooding onsite or offsite from occurring. Thus, the implementation of onsite drainage improvements and applicable requirements 219 City of Palm Desert Shadow Ridge Project, PP 23-0023/VTTM 38866 SECTION 15183 ANALYSIS TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES Page 43 will ensure that stormwater runoff will not substantially increase the rate or volume of runoff in a manner that would result in flooding on- or off-site. Impacts under this issue are considered less than significant with no mitigation required. iii. Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? Less Than Significant Impact – As indicated above, the project will not substantially create or contribute runoff water that would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater capacity, or provide substantial additional sources of polluted water, particularly because the site plan includes water quality control BMPs that will collect and treat on-site runoff. The project includes the implementation of a SWPPP and WQMP which will ensure that discharge of polluted material does not occur or is remediated in the event of an accidental spill. At present, the site is mostly pervious and runoff is either retained on site or is directed into a downstream collection area on the Golf Course; therefore, with the development of the site as proposed and through development of the planned onsite drainage system, runoff from the site would be managed more efficiently than that which exists at present. Thus, the implementation of onsite drainage improvements and applicable requirements will ensure that that drainage and stormwater will not create or contribute runoff that would exceed the capacity of existing or planned offsite stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. Impacts under this issue are considered less than significant with implementation of mitigation. iv. Impede or redirect flood flows? Less Than Significant Impact – According to the City General Plan Flood Hazard Overlay (Figure 9-3, Draft Technical Background Report), the proposed development area of the project is not located in a 100-year or 500-year flood hazard area. Furthermore, development of this site is not anticipated to redirect or impede flood flow at the project site, particularly given that surface flows on site will be directed to the onsite drainage features which will be capable of intercepting the incremental increase in the 100-year flow rate from the project site or otherwise be detained on site and discharged in conformance with San Bernardino County requirements. Therefore, impacts are considered less than significant comparable to the original project and no mitigation is required. d. No Impact – Please refer to response IX(c) above. The proposed development area of the project is not located within a flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zone. The project is located more than 70 miles from the Pacific Ocean, which eliminates the potential for a tsunami to impact the project area. Additionally, a seiche would not occur within the vicinity of the project because no lakes or enclosed bodies of water exist near or upstream of the site that could be impacted by such an event. Finally, according to Figure 9-3 of the technical study, the proposed project is located outside of the area of inundation related to the Whitewater River channel. As such, the proposed project would have no significant potential to risk exposure to flood hazards, tsunami, or seiche zone. e. Less Than Significant Impact – Please refer to the discussion under issue X(b) above. The CVWD’s 2020 Coachella Valley Regional Urban Water Management Plan (2021) identifies sufficient water resources to meet demand in its service area under current and future conditions, including during extended drought, without damage to the groundwater basin. The CVWD replaces short-term that is used to purchase additional water supplied through the State Water Project or the Colorado River. Furthermore, compliance with the State water conservation measures is enforced through CVWD. As such, it is not anticipated that the proposed TTM 28828-1 Project would have a significant potential to conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan. The findings presented above are fully consistent with the General Plan EIR and the proposed project will result in overall reduction of hydrology and water quality impacts presented in the General Plan 220 City of Palm Desert Shadow Ridge Project, PP 23-0023/VTTM 38866 SECTION 15183 ANALYSIS TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES Page 44 EIR. The impact is less than significant and the Project would not result in a new significant impact or in a substantial increase in the severity of hydrology and water quality impacts. Site conditions have not changed since 2016. The type and intensity of use proposed as part of the proposed project is consistent with the development anticipated, analyzed, and approved as part of the adopted General Plan Update and evaluated in the General Plan Update EIR. Thus, the proposed modified project will not cause or contribute to site specific or cumulative hydrology or water quality impacts at this location. Approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map 38866 does not result in any significant impacts peculiar to this project or parcel, result in a substantial increase in the severity of the hydrology/water quality impacts evaluated in the EIR, or in any new offsite or cumulative impacts that would render Section 15183 inapplicable to the project. Land Use and Planning Would the Project: General Plan EIR Findings General Plan EIR Findings: Project Conclusions: Equal or Less Severe New or Substantial Increase in Severity Applicable Standards and Requirements Resulting Level of Significance a) Physically divide an established community LTS  ☐ - LTS b) Cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect LTS  ☐ - LTS SUBSTANTIATION: Palm Desert General Plan and Draft Technical Background Report Background The General Plan Update EIR evaluated potential land use and planning impacts on a City-wide basis on pages 4.10-1 through 4.10.13. The EIR evaluated the two issues identified above and included an evaluation of the General Plan’s land use consistency with the CVMSHCP. All impacts would not result in significant impacts as with the original project, including cumulative growth impacts, without mitigation. This finding acknowledged that future development under the General Plan would alter the existing land use designations and to meet regional planning requirements from future development within the City, and based on the detailed analysis in the General Plan EIR, concluded that such impact would not require any mitigation measures to achieve a less than significant impact, just compliance with General Plan Goals and Policies. No mitigation measures were identified because the City incorporated the mitigation into an extensive set of General Plan Policies. Based on implementation of the General Plan Update policies and programs and the incorporation of changes to the Palm Desert Municipal Code, the impact of potential future development (City build-out) was determined to be a less than significant impact. Project specific findings on these land use issues are presented in the following evaluation. a. Less Than Significant Impact – The project area might be considered an infill development. To the north of the proposed residential subdivision is the City Sheriff’s Station adjacent to Gerald Ford Drive. East of the subdivision site along Shadow Ridge Drive is golf course which transitions to another single-family residential subdivision. To the south is the golf course. To the west is golf course, the Shadow Ridge Golf Clubhouse, and time-share residences. The proposed Shadow Ridge subdivision will replace the originally approved 324 time share units on the property that was considered in the General Plan EIR. The project will amend the CUP to eliminate the project site from 221 City of Palm Desert Shadow Ridge Project, PP 23-0023/VTTM 38866 SECTION 15183 ANALYSIS TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES Page 45 the Resort CUP. The proposed project will not physically divide the Shadow Ridge community; instead, it will complete the community and diversify the uses within it. Potential impacts for the project are considered less than significant and would be less than the impacts associated with the resort project included in the General Plan EIR. b. Less than Significant Impact – The proposed project will not cause any significant impacts if it is approved and implemented. For all environmental impact categories, potential impacts from implementing the proposed project have been determined to be less than significant without mitigation or, in some instances, after implementing specific mitigation measures. All proposed mitigation measures will be implemented by the applicant under either conditions of approval or under the City’s implementation of the project-specific Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) required by the General Plan EIR for which this Section 15183 analysis relies upon. Thus, based on a review of the Section 15183 analysis, the proposed project will not cause any significant impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purposed of avoiding or mitigating any environmental effects. This finding is consistent with the findings in the General Plan EIR. Potential impacts for the project are considered less than significant and would be less than the impacts associated with the resort project included in the General Plan EIR. The type and intensity of use proposed as part of the proposed project is consistent with the development anticipated, analyzed, and approved as part of the adopted General Plan Update and evaluated in the General Plan Update EIR. Thus, the land use and planning impacts from the modified project will be comparable or less than originally envisioned for the site, and will also result in a less than significant land use and planning impact due to the reduction to 93 residential units. Approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map 38866 does not result in significant impacts peculiar to the project or property, result in a substantial increase in the severity of the land use and planning impacts evaluated in the 2016 EIR, or result in offsite or cumulative impacts that would render Section 15183 inapplicable to the project. Mineral Resources Would the Project: General Plan 2040 EIR Findings General Plan 2040 EIR Findings: Project Conclusions: Equal or Less Severe New or Substantial Increase in Severity Applicable Standards and Requirements Resulting Level of Significance a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state No Impact  ☐ - No Impact b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan No Impact  ☐ - No Impact SUBSTANTIATION: Palm Desert General Plan and Draft Technical Background Report Background The General Plan Update EIR evaluated potential mineral resource impacts on a City-wide basis on pages 4.11-1 through 4.11.13. The EIR evaluated the two issues identified above and all impacts were concluded 222 City of Palm Desert Shadow Ridge Project, PP 23-0023/VTTM 38866 SECTION 15183 ANALYSIS TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES Page 46 to pose a less than significant impact on the any mineral resources that may occur within the City including cumulative impacts, without mitigation. This finding acknowledged that future development under the General Plan could include mineral resource development, but based on the detailed analysis in the General Plan EIR, concluded that such impact would not require any mitigation measures to achieve a less than significant impact. No mitigation measures were identified because the City incorporated the mitigation into a set of General Plan Policies. Based on implementation of the General Plan Update policies and programs and incorporation, the impact of potential future development under the General Plan Update would be a less than significant impact on mineral resources. a. No Impact – The City General Plan Draft Technical Background Report provides a map depicting Mineral Resource Zones in the City of Palm Desert. The data in Chapter 11 indicates that the whole of the City is identified as being in Mineral Resource Zones (MRZ) 3a and 3b, which indicates that the proposed project area is not located within an area containing identified mineral resources (Figure 11-1), but may contain some mineral resources, such as aggregate materials. Based on the actual development in the surrounding area, it appears that no aggregated resources have been encountered in the project area. Therefore, the development of the site is not anticipated to result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state. No impacts are anticipated and no mitigation is required. b. No Impact – As indicated above, the proposed project site does not contain any signs of known mineral resources delineated by the County or the City, and is currently surrounded by a mix of golf course recreational uses and recreational time-share units. The project site is designated for recreational residential uses (PR-5) on the City General Plan. As such, the use of the proposed project site for a comparable residential use would not result in the loss of any available locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan, as no such delineations of this site have occurred. No impacts under this issue are anticipated and no mitigation is required. The findings for the project site regarding mineral resources is consistent with the General Plan EIR findings. The type and intensity of use proposed as part of the proposed project is consistent with the development anticipated, analyzed, and approved as part of the adopted General Plan Update and evaluated in the General Plan Update EIR. The project would not result in a new significant impact or in a substantial increase in the severity of the prior impacts identified in the General Plan Update EIR. Approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map 38866 does not result in any new significant impacts peculiar to the project or property, result in a substantial increase in the severity of the mineral resource impacts evaluated in the 2016 EIR, or result in any new offsite or cumulative impacts that would render Section 15183 inapplicable to the project. Noise and Vibration Would the Project: General Plan EIR Findings General Plan EIR Findings: Project Conclusions: Equal or Less Severe New or Substantial Increase in Severity Applicable Standards and Requirements Resulting Level of Significance a) Generate a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies LTS with MM  ☐ - LTS with MM 223 City of Palm Desert Shadow Ridge Project, PP 23-0023/VTTM 38866 SECTION 15183 ANALYSIS TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES Page 47 b) Generate excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels LTS  ☐ - No Impact c) For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels No Impact  ☐ - No Impact SUBSTANTIATION: Palm Desert General Plan Technical Background Report; Palm Desert General Plan Environmental Impact Report (GPEIR); and Palm Desert General Plan. All reports published and finalized in 2016. Background The General Plan Update EIR evaluated potential noise impacts on a City-wide basis on pages 4.12-1 through 4.9.32. The General Plan EIR evaluated the same issues, but under six questions, rather than three, and concluded future City noise would change, but with implementation of mitigation for construction noise sources the future development would pose a less than significant impact on the City’s environment, including cumulative impacts. This finding acknowledged that future development under the General Plan would result in an increase in noise sources (construction, traffic, and stationary sources and aircraft) and potential conflict with exposure to significant noise. Based on implementation of the General Plan Update policies and programs and enforcement of existing rules, including the City’s Noised Ordinance, the impact of potential greater noise generation in the City would be a less than significant impact. Project specific findings on these noise issues are presented in the following evaluation. Noise Setting Noise is generally described as unwanted sound. The proposed project consists of a single-family residential subdivision that will be developed within an approximate 20.7-acre site. The project is located in a mixed suburban-recreation portion of the City of Palm Desert (City). The project site consists of vacant land containing disturbed native and non-native vegetation, consistent with the remnants of the rural desert character that can be found throughout undeveloped parcels within the City. The primary existing noise sources consist of the primary adjacent roadways, Monterey Avenue to the west and Gerald Ford Drive to the north. There are residential sensitive noise receptors located in close proximity to the project site, to the west and east, and Marriott’s Shadow Ridge Golf Resort and course surround the project site. The unit of sound pressure ratio to the faintest sound detectable to a person with normal hearing is called a decibel (dB). Sound or noise can vary in intensity by over one million times within the range of human hearing. A logarithmic loudness scale, similar to the Richter scale for earthquake magnitude, is therefore used to keep sound intensity numbers at a convenient and manageable level. The human ear is not equally sensitive to all sound frequencies within the entire spectrum. Noise levels at maximum human sensitivity from around 500 to 2,000 cycles per second are factored more heavily into sound descriptions in a process called “A-weighting,” written as “dBA.” Leq is a time-averaged sound level; a single-number value that expresses the time-varying sound level for the specified period as though it were a constant sound level with the same total sound energy as the time- varying level. Its unit is the decibel (dB). The most common averaging period for Leq is hourly. Because community receptors are more sensitive to unwanted noise intrusion during more sensitive evening and nighttime hours, state law requires that an artificial dBA increment be added to quiet time noise 224 City of Palm Desert Shadow Ridge Project, PP 23-0023/VTTM 38866 SECTION 15183 ANALYSIS TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES Page 48 levels. The State of California has established guidelines for acceptable community noise levels that are based on the Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) rating scale (a 24-hour integrated noise measurement scale). The guidelines rank noise land use compatibility in terms of "normally acceptable," "conditionally acceptable," and "clearly unacceptable" noise levels for various land use types. The State Guidelines, Land Use Compatibility for Community Noise Exposure, single-family homes are "normally acceptable" in exterior noise environments up to 60 dB CNEL and "conditionally acceptable" up to 70 dB CNEL based on this scale. Schools, libraries and churches are "normally acceptable" up to 70 dB CNEL, as are office buildings and business, commercial and professional uses with some structural noise attenuation. In the City 65 dBA is identified as the outdoor threshold of noise significance. a. Less Than Significant Impact – As noted above, the background noise level at the project site is dominated by traffic noise from two roadways near the project site and the general proximity to the I- 10 Freeway and railroad corridor. Refer to Figures XIII-1 and XIII-2 which show current (2016) and future (2040) forecast noise contours. Based on the proposed project site location, the site is currently located outside of any of the 70 and 65 dBA Ldn noise contours from these noise sources, and is also located outside of the 60 dBA Ldn noise contour under the existing background noise setting. The site appears to just be exposed to the 60 dBA Ldn noise contour on the northern portion of the site in the 2040 noise contour forecast (Figure XIII-2). Based on these data and since there are no other major noise sources in the project area, the project site will not be exposed to noise levels greater than the City’s 65 dBA noise significance threshold now or in the forecast future. In terms of the future site development under the proposed project, the reduced size of this project, compared to up to 324 approved time share units, will result in a substantial reduction in activity from the 20.7-acre site. Traffic will increase on Shadow Ridge Road with the proposed development (forecast is for 848 trips per day), but the increase will be consistent the continued operation of the Road as a local street. When fully developed, the proposed residential subdivision is forecast to function with typical background noise levels for a residential subdivision of between 50-55 dBA CNEL. Thus, future noise levels within the proposed project are forecast to be less than significant and lower than the levels associated with the resort. Short-Term Noise Short-term construction noise impacts associates with the proposed project will occur in phases, dominated by earth moving equipment and small structural construction equipment. The earth- moving sources are the noisiest type of equipment typically ranging from 75 to 90 dB at 50 feet from the source. Refer to Table XIII-1 below, which shows construction equipment noise levels at 25, 50 and 100 feet from the noise source. Table XIII-1 NOISE LEVELS OF CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AT 25, 50 AND 100 FEET (in dBA LEQ) FROM THE SOURCE Equipment Noise Levels at 25 feet Noise Levels at 50 feet Noise Levels at 100 feet Earthmoving Front Loader 85 79 73 Backhoes 86 80 74 Dozers 86 80 74 Tractors 86 80 74 Scrapers 91 85 79 Trucks 91 85 79 Material Handling Concrete Mixer 91 85 79 225 City of Palm Desert Shadow Ridge Project, PP 23-0023/VTTM 38866 SECTION 15183 ANALYSIS TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES Page 49 Equipment Noise Levels at 25 feet Noise Levels at 50 feet Noise Levels at 100 feet Concrete Pump 88 82 76 Crane 89 83 77 Derrick 94 88 82 Stationary Sources Pumps 82 79 70 Generator 84 78 72 Compressors 87 81 75 Other Saws 84 78 72 Vibrators 82 76 70 Source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency “Noise” However, the City exempts construction activity on private properties that are determined by the director of building and safety to be essential to the completion of the project (Municipal Code Chapter 13.01.060[9]). Specifically, the City of Palm Desert exempts construction noise between the hours of 7:00 am to 5:30 pm weekdays, and 8:00 am to 5 pm on Saturdays, but does not contain quantified noise level limits for construction activities. The regulatory exemption reflects the City’s acknow- ledgment that construction noise is a necessary part of new development and does not create an unacceptable public nuisance when conducted during the least noise sensitive hours of the day. Thus, construction noise is considered a common necessity for new development. Therefore, through compliance with the City’s noise standards, and the General Plan Noise Element, short-term construction impacts may expose persons to noise in excess of standards established by the City. The City accepts this circumstance and has found (General Plan EIR) that during daylight construc- tion hour this is an acceptable public nuisance. However, the General Plan also recommends the implementation of mitigation to control noise to the extent feasible (page 4.12-17 of the General Plan EIR which measures have been included in the project. The project construction will implement the General Plan noise mitigation measures during construction. No new mitigation is required. Thus, based on the existing noise circumstances within the vicinity of the project (roadway noise), short-term noise impacts are considered less than significant. With the implementation of the General Plan’s construction noise management measures, the proposed project would have a less than significant potential to result in generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of a project. No new mitigation is required. b. Less Than Significant Impact – Vibration is the periodic oscillation of a medium or object. The rumbling sound caused by vibration of room surfaces is called structure borne noises. Sources of groundborne vibrations include natural phenomena (e.g., earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, sea waves, landslides) or human-made causes (e.g., explosions, machinery, traffic, trains, construction equipment). Vibration sources may be continuous or transient. Vibration is often described in units of velocity (inches per second), and discussed in decibel (dB) units in order to compress the range of numbers required to describe vibration. Vibration impacts related to human development are generally associated with activities such as train operations, construction, and heavy truck movements. The FTA Assessment states that in contrast to airborne noise, ground-borne vibration is not a common environmental problem. Although the motion of the ground may be noticeable to people outside structures, without the effects associated with the shaking of a structure, the motion does not 226 City of Palm Desert Shadow Ridge Project, PP 23-0023/VTTM 38866 SECTION 15183 ANALYSIS TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES Page 50 provoke the same adverse human reaction to people outside. Within structures, the effects of ground- borne vibration include noticeable movement of the building floors, rattling of windows, shaking of items on shelves or hanging on walls, and rumbling sounds. FTA Assessment further states that it is unusual for vibration from sources such as buses and trucks to be perceptible, even in locations close to major roads. However, some common sources of vibration are trains, trucks on rough roads, and construction activities, such as blasting, pile driving, and heavy earth-moving equipment. The Federal Transit Association (FTA) guidelines identify a level of 80 VdB for sensitive land uses. This threshold provides a basis for determining the relative significance of potential project related vibration impacts. The proposed project does not involve any construction activities that are inherently high in vibrations, such as pile driving or large grading equipment in close proximity to existing structures or residences. Given that there are no vibration sensitive receptors located within about 386 feet of the project site, temporary vibration levels associated with project construction are forecast to be less than significant. Furthermore, annoyance‐related impacts would be short‐term and would only occur during site grading and exterior construction activities. Due to the size of the project site, and the lack of any operational uses that would include vibration, the proposed project will not expose people to generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels during occupancy. c. No Impact – No private airports are located in the vicinity of the project. The closest public airport is the Bermuda Dunes Airport, which is located approximately 7 miles southeast of the project site; the PP23-0023/VTTM 38866 Project is not located within the Bermuda Dunes Airport Planning Area and Airport Safety Review Area due to the distance from this existing airport. Additionally, the proposed project is located outside of the Airport’s noise impact area. Therefore, because the proposed project is located outside of the Airport’s noise impact area, the proposed project would have no potential to expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels from nearby airport activity. No mitigation is required. The type and intensity of use proposed as part of the proposed project is consistent with the development anticipated, analyzed, and approved as part of the adopted General Plan Update and evaluated in the General Plan Update EIR. Thus, from a noise perspective the proposed modified project site will have a comparable noise impact relative to the originally approved project. Approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map 38866 does not result in any new significant impacts peculiar to the project or property, result in a substantial increase in the severity of noise impacts evaluated in the 2016 EIR, or result in new offsite or cumulative impacts that would render Section 15183 inapplicable to the project. Population and Housing Would the Project: General Plan 2040 EIR Findings General Plan 2040 EIR Findings: Project Conclusions: Equal or Less Severe New or Substantial Increase in Severity Applicable Standards and Requirements Resulting Level of Significance a) Induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure) LTS  ☐ - LTS b) Displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere No Impact  ☐ - No Impact 227 City of Palm Desert Shadow Ridge Project, PP 23-0023/VTTM 38866 SECTION 15183 ANALYSIS TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES Page 51 SUBSTANTIATION: Palm Desert General Plan and Draft Technical Background Report Background The General Plan Update EIR evaluated potential population and housing impacts on a City-wide basis on pages 4.13-1 through 4.13.9. The EIR evaluated the two issues identified above and, all impacts were concluded to pose no impact or a less than significant impact on the City’s population, employment and housing environment, including cumulative impacts, without mitigation. This finding acknowledged that future development under the General Plan would lead to growth, but the amount of growth accommodated would be consistent with regional forecasts. Based on the detailed analysis in the General Plan EIR, it concluded that such impact would not require any mitigation measures to achieve a less than significant impact. No mitigation measures were identified because the City incorporated the mitigation into an extensive set of General Plan Policies. Based on implementation of the General Plan Update policies and programs, the impact of potential future development would be a less than significant impact. Project specific findings on these land use issues are presented in the following evaluation. a. Less Than Significant Impact – The Shadow Ridge development consists of 93 single-family, detached residential units. The project area was originally proposed to construct about 300 time share units, but the Marriott Company concluded that market changes would no longer support these types units and chose to work with Toll Brothers to support establishment of a new residential subdivision on the property. Based on the General Plan EIR and the Draft Technical Background Report, the City households (2016) was 2.16 residents per residential unit. The population estimate for Palm Desert in 2016 was 49,335 and the current (2023) California Department of Finance estimate is 50,615, an increase over the seven-year period of 1,280 persons, or about new 183 residents per year. The forecast by the City in its General Plan is that there would be 61,691 residents in the City by 2040; the population forecast by the Southern California Association of Governments was approximately the same (See Table 4.13-3 of the General Plan DEIR). Based on average growth over the 24-year period (2016-2040), the amount of population growth would be about 515 persons per year. At buildout, the proposed project could add up to 201 new residents to the City based on 2.16 residents per dwelling unit, but this is no greater than the number of temporary residents associated with the 324 time share units being replace. Toll Brothers anticipates that the 93 units will be absorbed by the market over a period of about two years. Based on this assumption, the proposed project would generate about 100 new residents per year. Given the historic growth rate between 2016 and 2023, the proposed project’s incremental addition to the City’s population would not induce a substantial unplanned amount of population growth within the City of Palm Desert. Also, due to the infill nature of this project, it will not contribute indirectly to significant growth inducement. No mitigation is required and the potential impacts are consistent (less than) the assumptions contained in the General Plan EIR. b. No Impact – The project site is currently undeveloped and therefore, it will not displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing. No adverse impact will occur under this issue from implementing the proposed project. The type and intensity of use proposed as part of the proposed project is consistent with the development anticipated, analyzed, and approved as part of the adopted General Plan Update and evaluated in the General Plan Update EIR. Approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map 38866 does not result in any new significant impacts peculiar to the project or property, result in a substantial increase in the severity of population or housing impacts evaluated in the 2016 EIR, or result in any new offsite or cumulative impacts that would render Section 15183 inapplicable to the project. Total population impact would likely be less under the modified project. 228 City of Palm Desert Shadow Ridge Project, PP 23-0023/VTTM 38866 SECTION 15183 ANALYSIS TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES Page 52 Public Services Would the Project: General Plan EIR Findings Relationship to General Plan EIR Findings: Project Conclusions: Equal or Less Severe New or Substantial Increase in Severity Applicable Standards and Requirements Resulting Level of Significance Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: a) Fire Protection LTS  ☐ LTS b) Police Protection LTS  ☐ LTS c) Schools and Libraries LTS  ☐ LTS d) Parks LTS  ☐ LTS e) Other public facilities? LTS  ☐ LTS SUBSTANTIATION: Palm Desert General Plan EIR and Draft Technical Background Report Background The General Plan Update EIR evaluated potential public service issue impacts on a City-wide basis on pages 4.14-1 through 4.14.49. Chapter 4.14 of the General Plan EIR includes the evaluation of Public Services (all of the above) and the evaluation of certain utilities (water, wastewater and solid waste). The General Plan EIR evaluated the same public service issues as listed above, and concluded future City public services (fire, law enforcement, schools, parks and libraries) would have to expand based on future growth, with no mitigation measures, and would pose a less than significant impact on the City’s ability to provide services, including cumulative impacts. Based on implementation of the General Plan Update policies and actions and enforcement of existing rules, including the City’s requirement to conduct CEQA review for each future project, potential impacts under this issue were concluded to be a less than significant impact. Thus, the impact of increasing potential demand for public services in the City would be a less than significant impact. Project specific findings on these public service issues are presented in the following evaluation. a. Less Than Significant Impact – The City General Plan EIR ant the Draft Technical Background Report provide an excellent summary of the public services infrastructure in the City. The net result is that the City’s fire protection services have a very good rating ISO rating of 3, on a scale of 1 through 10, with 1 being the highest. The City has three Fire Stations manned by the Riverside County Fire 229 City of Palm Desert Shadow Ridge Project, PP 23-0023/VTTM 38866 SECTION 15183 ANALYSIS TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES Page 53 Department, with an additional three stations located in Indian Wells and Rancho Mirage capable of responding to a fire, if necessary, as part pf a regional fire protection program. The nearest fire station is located at the corner of Country Club and Portola Avenue, about two-miles distant. In 2016 the City was maintaining an average response time of 3.6 minutes, with 86.2% of responses less than five minutes. According to the fire protection findings in the General Plan EIR, both project specific and cumulative impacts to this system are less than significant based on implementation of General Plan Policies (Safety Element (4) Utilities and Services Element (7)) which require maintaining updated Development Impact Fees (DIF) to reflect changing conditions within the City. The addition of this small residential development with approximately 200 new residents is also not forecast to require any new fire protection facilities. As DIF and review of the development to install current fire protection equipment in the new homes are mandatory programs for new development, the proposed project can be implemented without significant adverse impacts on the City’s fire protection system. b. Less Than Significant Impact – The City General Plan EIR ant the Draft Technical Background Report provide an excellent summary of the public services infrastructure in the City. The net result is that the City’s law enforcement protection services have been maintained at General Plan’s preferred ratio of sworn officers per 1,000 population at a ratio of 1.5 officers or better. The increase of the City’s population by 1,280 since 2016 would have required a minimum of one additional sworn officers in the City. The proposed project’s approximate 200 potential new residents is not sufficient to create demand for additional law enforcement personnel. The City’s sheriff’s station is located at the southeast corner of Gerald Ford and Shadow Ridge Road, approximately one-quarter mile from the proposed subdivision. In 2016 the City was maintaining an average response for priority 1 calls were about six minutes, with average responses about 15.35 minutes. According to the law enforcement protection findings in the General Plan EIR, both project specific and cumulative impacts to this system are less than significant based on implementation of General Plan Policies (Utilities and Services Element (4)) which require maintaining updated Development Impact Fees (DIF) to reflect changing conditions within the City. As DIF and review of the development to install current home protection designs in the new homes are mandatory programs for new development, the proposed project can be implemented without significant adverse impacts on the City’s law enforcement system. c. Less Than Significant Impact – The City of Palm Desert is served by two school districts, the Desert Sands Unified School District and the Palm Springs Unified School District. Desert Sands serves the core of City and Palm Springs serves the northern and southern portions of the City. There are four elementary schools, 1 charter elementary, 1 middle school and 1 high school. There are also numerous private schools and post-secondary schools located in the City. The proposed project will add 93 new single-family residences to the City and based on the average number of persons per dwelling unit, the proposed project is forecast to generate about 201 new residents. The General Plan EIR indicates that approximately 0.39 students will be generated per dwelling unit, or a total of about 78 new students. The General Plan EIR concluded that project specific and cumulative impacts on the school system would be less than significant with payment of school fees mandated by the State. Thus, school system impacts are forecast to be less than significant with any additional mitigation. d. Less Than Significant Impact – The City of Palm Desert partners with the Desert Recreation District to provide park and recreation programs and activities. According to the General Plan EIR the City operated 163 acres of parkland; three municipally-owned golf courses; and provided access to 23,060 acres of open space and a total of 6,834 acres of golf course in 2016. At that time the City had approximately 3.23 acres of parkland per resident, with a goal of 6.25 acres of parkland (mini - parks, neighborhood parks and community parks) per resident. Based on the site-specific studies of the project site, the site does not have any significant natural features onsite that could or should be preserved from development and retain as park or open space. Based on the assumed 201 potential residents, the future residents will require about 20% of the 6.25 acres of park or recreational facilities. 230 City of Palm Desert Shadow Ridge Project, PP 23-0023/VTTM 38866 SECTION 15183 ANALYSIS TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES Page 54 This equates to approximately 1.25 acres of park or recreational space and consistent with the City’s park fee ordinance, the project will be responsible for the payment of standard park fees in accordance with City General Plan Policies. e. Less Than Significant Impact – The General Plan EIR identifies several other services that could be required future residents of the proposed project, but only one topic was evaluated, Library resources. The following evaluation focuses solely on library resources. The City’s policy is to ensure adequate library resources are available for residents and students of the City. However, based on the adequacy library services/resources in the City in 2016, the General Plan EIR concluded that the future population growth within the would not exceed the capacity of library services/resources. Based on these findings, the proposed project will not place a significant project specific or cumulative demand on library services. The type and intensity of use proposed as part of the proposed project is consistent with the development anticipated, analyzed, and approved as part of the adopted General Plan Update and evaluated in the General Plan Update EIR. Therefore, the proposed modified project will result in a similar less than significant contribution to demand for public services and recreation facilities. Approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map 38866 does not result in any new significant impacts peculiar to the property or project, result in a substantial increase in the severity of public service and recreation facility impacts evaluated in the 2016 EIR, or result in offsite or cumulative impacts that would render Section 15183 inapplicable to the project. Recreation Would the Project: General Plan EIR Findings Relationship to General Plan EIR Findings: Project Conclusions: Equal or Less Severe New or Substantial Increase in Severity Applicable Standards and Requirements Resulting Level of Significance a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? LTS  ☐ LTS b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? LTS  ☐ LTS SUBSTANTIATION: Palm Desert General Plan EIR and Draft Technical Background Report Background The General Plan Update EIR evaluated potential recreation issue impacts on a City-wide basis on pages 4.14-17 through 4.14.23. Chapter 4.14 of the General Plan EIR includes the evaluation of Public Services (all of the above) and the evaluation of certain utilities (water, wastewater and solid waste). The General Plan EIR evaluated recreation issues as one of the Public Services, and concluded future City parks and recreation services would have to expand based on future growth, with no mitigation measures, and would pose a less than significant impact on the City’s ability to provide services, including cumulative impacts. Based on implementation of the General Plan Update policies and actions and enforcement of existing rules, including the City’s requirement to conduct CEQA review for each future project, potential impacts 231 City of Palm Desert Shadow Ridge Project, PP 23-0023/VTTM 38866 SECTION 15183 ANALYSIS TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES Page 55 under this issue were concluded to be a less than significant impact. Thus, the impact of increasing potential demand for recreation facilities and services in the City would be a less than significant impact. Project specific findings on these public service issues are presented in the following evaluation. a. Less Than Significant – As outlined in Section XV.d, the proposed project has the potential to increase demand for recreation programs and facilities. To remain consistent with the City General Plan’s recreation policies, the project will pay park fees in accordance with the City’s standard park fee requirements. b. Less Than Significant Impact – The proposed project does not include any recreational facilities that could cause a significant adverse physical effect on the environment. Impacts under this issue will be less than significant. Approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map 38866 does not result in any new significant impacts peculiar to the property to the project, result in a substantial increase in the severity of recreation impacts evaluated in the 2016 EIR, or result in new offsite or cumulative impacts that would render Section 15183 inapplicable to the project. Transportation Would the Project: General Plan 2040 EIR Findings General Plan 2040 EIR Findings: Project Conclusions: Equal or Less Severe New or Substantial Increase in Severity Applicable Standards and Requirements Resulting Level of Significance a) Conflict with a program, plan, ordinance or policy assessing the circulation system, including transit, roadways, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities SU  ☐ N/A LTS b) Conflict with or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3, subsection (b) re: VMT LTS  ☐ - LTS c) Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature LTS  ☐ - LTS d) Result in inadequate emergency access LTS  ☐ - LTS SUBSTANTIATION: The following information is provided based on two studies titled “Shadow Ridge Trip Generation Assessment” prepared by Urban Crossroads dated November 22, 2023 (provided in Appendix 7) and “Shadow Ridge Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Screening Evaluation,” prepared by Urban Crossroads dated November 21, 2023 (provided in Appendix 8). Background The General Plan Update EIR evaluated potential transportation impacts on a City-wide basis on pages 4.15-1 through 4.15-67. The General Plan EIR evaluated the same issues, but under eight separate questions, rather than four. The General Plan EIR concluded that one of the 8 issues would be significant and unavoidable, specifically conflict with Caltrans traffic study guidelines, which establish LOS C as he performance standard (intersection of Monterey and the I-10 east bound off-ramp). For the remainder of the issues, the General Plan EIR concluded future City intersections and roadway segments would change, 232 City of Palm Desert Shadow Ridge Project, PP 23-0023/VTTM 38866 SECTION 15183 ANALYSIS TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES Page 56 but would pose a less than significant impact on the City’s environment, including cumulative impacts. This finding acknowledged that future development under the General Plan would result in an increase in traffic related to forecast development. Based on implementation of the General Plan Update policies and programs and enforcement of future CEQA review of individual projects, the impact of potential greater traffic generation in the City would be a less than significant impact. This included a discussion of Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) contained in the EIR, which concluded that future VMT would not exceed anticipated future City thresholds (refer to page 4.15-65 of the General Plan EIR. Project specific findings on these transportation issues are presented in the following evaluation. a. Less Than Significant Impact – The trip generation for this project has been evaluated in the context of the existing approved project. The project site was previously approved for development of 324 timeshare units in 1998. In Appendix 7 Urban Crossroads compares the trip generation for the proposed 93 single family residences to the trips that were forecast for the timeshare units in the 1998 traffic study. Table XVII-1 (Table 3 from Appendix 7) indicates that the approved project would generate 2,796 daily trips compared to the 878 trips. The reductions in trips are summarized on Table XVII-1 of Appendix 7. The trip generation data indicate that AM Peak Hour trips will be 65 trips and PM Peak Hour trips will be 87 trips. According to the trip generation study the proposed project will generate less than 100 peak hour trips and it is also anticipated to contribute fewer than 50 peak hour trips during both peak hours to any off-site intersection. Based on the analysis in Appendix 8, additional peak hour traffic operations analysis is not required based on the County’s Guidelines, which the City of Palm Desert utilizes for evaluation. Thus, the proposed project will have a less than significant adverse impact or conflict with the area circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities. b. Less Than Significant Impact – CEQA presently (since 2020) requires all lead agencies to adopt Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) as the measure for identifying transportation impacts for land use projects. The City utilizes the County’s methodology for determining VMT impacts, which includes project specific VMT screening procedures. Based on the analysis in Appendix 8, the proposed project meets the Small Project and the Map-Based screening criteria and is therefore determined to have a less than significant adverse VMT impact. c. Less Than Significant Impact – The proposed project will not be altering the alignment of Shadow Ridge Road, but will be installing new gates and improving the paved roadway. Therefore, the potential to create roadway hazards due to a geometric design feature or incompatible uses will not occur. Thus, the proposed project will have a less than significant adverse impact on this issue. d. Less Than Significant Impact – The proposed project will include roadway construction on Shadow Ridge Road. Such construction can negatively impact emergency access to the project site and the existing Shadow Ridge facilities. The project includes a construction traffic control plan as part of the construction management plan. Elements of the plan should include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: • Develop circulation and detour plans, if necessary, to minimize impacts to local street circulation. Use haul routes minimizing truck traffic on local roadways to the extent possible. • To the extent feasible, and as needed to avoid adverse impacts on traffic flow, schedule truck trips outside of peak morning and evening commute hours. • Install traffic control devices as specified in Caltrans’ Manual of Traffic Controls for Construction and Maintenance Work Zones where needed to maintain safe driving conditions. Use flaggers and/or signage to safely direct traffic through construction work zones. • For roadways requiring lane closures that would result in a single open lane, maintain alternate one-way traffic flow and utilize flagger-controls. • Coordinate with facility owners or administrators of sensitive land uses such as police and fire stations, hospitals, and schools. Provide advance notification to the facility owner or operator of the timing, location, and duration of construction activities. 233 City of Palm Desert Shadow Ridge Project, PP 23-0023/VTTM 38866 SECTION 15183 ANALYSIS TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES Page 57 • all disturbances to public roadways will be repaired in a manner that complies with the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction (green book) or other applicable City of Victorville standard design requirements. Upon implementation of a construction traffic management plan, any potential conflict with emergency access will be considered reduced to a less than significant impact in the short term, i.e., project construction. There will be no long-term conflicts with emergency access. Thus, any impacts are considered less than significant with implementation of mitigation. No additional mitigation is required. Based on a comparison of the project specific Transportation findings, the proposed project is fully consistent with the General Plan EIR findings and will actually reduce the overall trip generation within the City compared to the approved analysis in the General Plan EIR. No further review is required. The type and intensity of use proposed as part of the proposed project is consistent with the development anticipated, analyzed, and approved as part of the adopted General Plan Update and evaluated in the General Plan Update EIR. Approval of Precise Plan 23-0023 and Vesting Tentative Tract Map 38866 does not result in any new significant impacts that are peculiar to the project or property, result in a substantial increase in the severity of traffic and circulation impacts evaluated in the 2016 EIR, or result in significant offsite or cumulative impacts that would render Section 15183 inapplicable to the project. Tribal Cultural Resources Would the Project: Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is: General Plan EIR Findings General Plan 2040 EIR Findings: Project Conclusions: Equal or Less Severe New or Substantial Increase in Severity Applicable Standards and Regulations Resulting Level of Significance a) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k), or No Impact  ☐ - No Impact b) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1 In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe. No Impact  ☐ - No Impact SUBSTANTIATION A Tribal Resources is defined in the Public Resources Code section 21074 and includes the following: 234 City of Palm Desert Shadow Ridge Project, PP 23-0023/VTTM 38866 SECTION 15183 ANALYSIS TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES Page 58 • Sites, features, places, cultural landscapes, sacred places, and objects with cultural value to a California Native American Tribe that are either of the following: included or determined to be eligible for inclusion in the California Register of Historical Resources or included in a local register of historical resources as defined in subdivision (k) of Section 5020.1; • A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Section 5024.1 for the purpose of this paragraph, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resources to a California American tribe; • A cultural landscape that meets the criteria of subdivision (a) is a tribal cultural resource to the extent that the landscape is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape; • A historical resource described in Section 21084.1, a unique archaeological resource as defined in subdivision (g) of Section 21083.2, or a “non-unique archaeological resource” as defined in subdivision (h) of Section 21083.2 may also be a tribal resource if it conforms with the criteria of subdivision (a). a. No Impact – Consultation was completed as part of the General Plan EIR. See Cultural Resources. b. No Impact – Consultation was completed as part of the General Plan EIR. See Cultural Resources. The type and intensity of use proposed as part of the proposed project is consistent with the development anticipated, analyzed, and approved as part of the adopted General Plan Update and evaluated in the General Plan Update EIR. Approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map 38866 does not result in any new significant impacts peculiar to the project or property, result in a substantial increase in the severity of tribal cultural resource impacts (evaluated in the 2016 EIR; see Cultural Resources), or result in any offsite or cumulative impacts that would render Section 15183 inapplicable to the project. Utilities and Service Systems Would the Project: General Plan EIR Findings General Plan EIR Findings: Project Conclusions: Equal or Less Severe New or Substantial Increase in Severity Applicable Standards and Requirements Resulting Level of Significance a) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry and multiple dry years LTS  ☐ - LTS b) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments LTS  ☐ - LTS c) Generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals LTS  ☐ - LTS 235 City of Palm Desert Shadow Ridge Project, PP 23-0023/VTTM 38866 SECTION 15183 ANALYSIS TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES Page 59 SUBSTANTIATION: Palm Desert General Plan EIR; Draft Technical Background Report; and 2020 Coachella Valley Regional Urban Water Management Plan Background The General Plan Update EIR evaluated potential utilities and service system s issue impacts on a City- wide basis on pages 4.14-26 through 4.14.49. Chapter 4.14 of the General Plan EIR includes the evaluation of Public Services and the evaluation of certain utilities (water, wastewater, stormwater drainage, and solid waste). No analysis was provided in the General Plan EIR of private utilities in that serve the City, including electricity, natural gas, and telecommunication facilities, but all of these utilities are already adjacent to the site for the proposed project and connection to these utilities results in minimal physical changes in the environment. The General Plan EIR concluded future City utilities and service systems would have to expand to meet future growth in the City, with no mitigation measures, and would pose a less than significant impact on the ability to provide utilities services, including cumulative impacts. Based on implementation of the General Plan Update policies and actions and enforcement of existing rules, including the City’s requirement to conduct CEQA review for each future project, potential impacts under this issue were concluded to be a less than significant impact. Thus, the impact of increasing potential demand for utilities and service systems in the City would be a less than significant impact. Project specific findings on these public service issues are presented in the following evaluation. a. Less Than Significant Impact – The proposed project’s connections to the utility infrastructure will all occur in close proximity of the proposed project. The connection to Southern California Edison (SCE) will occur at SCE’s existing facilities on Lot 67. Other dry utilities, such as Frontier, Charter and Southern California Gas will accessed near the intersection of Gerald Ford and Shadow Ridge. Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD or District) will provide water and sewer lines that will be accessed from either or both the north and south, as shown on Figure XIX-1. Stormwater will be managed onsite with bioretention basins and any stormwater discharge from the property will be discharged to the bioretention area of the adjacent Shadow Ridge Golf Course. Solid waste will be collected by Burrtec under its contract with the City. No major relocation or construction of any new infrastructure will be required to support this small, 93-unit subdivision. This finding, combined with the minimal impacts from constructing and occupying this proposed project results in a less than significant impact from its implementation. b. Less Than Significant Impact – Two documents were reviewed to determine whether sufficient water supplies will be available in the future. The Draft Technical Background Report summarizes water supply information for the City of Palm Desert, while the 2020 Coachella Valley Regional Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) addresses the cumulative demand for water supplied by all the water agencies in the Coachella Valley. One extraneous factor affects per capita water demand in the project area, City of Palm Desert and CVWD service area. The Coachella Valley region has a large seasonal population (winter) that distorts water use per capita and there are a lot of second homes in the Valley that are not occupied by City residents. With this understanding, the Draft Technical Background Report to the City General Plan identified water use in Palm Desert in 2015 as 28,899 acre-feet, or about 0.57acre-feet per year per capita. Assuming this value remains correct for 2024, the addition of an estimated 201 new residents from the project would increase water demand within the City by about 115 acre-feet per year. The CVWD serves a much larger area than just the City of Palm Desert in the Coachella Valley. Within its service area the gross water usage in acre-feet/year (AFY) between 2020 and 2045 is shown on Table 4-10 of the UWMP as ranging between 109,300 AFY (2020 and 164,966 AFY (2045). The findings for available water supply under specific scenarios is summarized on Table 4-24. The data indicate that CVWD has a sufficient water supply to meet demand under average year, single-dry year, and multiple dry years (up to five). Based on the analysis in the referenced documents, the proposed project and cumulative impacts regarding water supply will be a less than significant impact. 236 City of Palm Desert Shadow Ridge Project, PP 23-0023/VTTM 38866 SECTION 15183 ANALYSIS TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES Page 60 c. Less Than Significant Impact – The General Plan EIR evaluated wastewater generation and capacity and concluded that at full buildout there would be adequate wastewater treatment capacity to meet the increase in wastewater generation with an increase of 11,905 residents. The proposed project with 93 new residential units will replace the approximately 300 time-share units previously approved for the project site, a reduction in potential wastewater generation of about 69%. This cumulative increase, evaluated on page 4.14-35 of the EIR, was determined to be a less than significant impact based on the overall increase not being a substantial increase over existing capacity, but also a City Policy requiring future projects, such as the Shadow Ridge Subdivision, to pay development impact fees and connections fees to fund potential future expansion o water reclamation plans in the CVWD’s jurisdiction. The proposed project is forecast to generate an estimated 46,230 gallons per day. This increase is considered to be less than significant for the reasons outlined in the preceding analysis. d&e. Less Than Significant Impact – The General Plan EIR concluded that buildout of the General Plan would not result in a significant impact on solid waste disposal capacity or meeting compliance with solid waste regulations based on implementation of existing solid waste management programs and General Plan Policies. This was based on buildout of the City to its maximum population. As noted in the previous utility discussions, the proposed project will reduce the number of occupiable units that could be constructed at the project site from approximately 300 to 93 units. The EIR cites a value of 0.41 tons of waste generated per unit per year. This equates to about 38.13 tons of waste generated per year by the proposed project. This volume of waste can be compared to the EIR conclusion that 12,874.41 of total new solid waste generation would be cumulatively less than significant within the City at buildout. Through implementation of existing City solid waste management programs and General Plan Policies, the potential impact of the proposed project will be less than significant. The type and intensity of use proposed as part of the proposed project is consistent with the development anticipated, analyzed, and approved as part of the adopted General Plan Update and evaluated in the General Plan Update EIR. Thus, approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map 38866 does not result in any new significant impacts peculiar to the project or property, result in a substantial increase in the severity of utility and service impacts that were identified in the EIR, or result in offsite or cumulative impacts that render Section 15183 inapplicable to the project. Utility systems have grown since the 2016 evaluation, but capacity of each utility system has expanded accordingly. Wildfire Would the Project: General Plan EIR Findings General Plan EIR Findings: Project Conclusions: Equal or Less Severe New or Substantial Increase in Severity Applicable Standards and Requirements Resulting Level of Significance a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? LTS  ☐ - LTS b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of wildfire? LTS  ☐ - LTS 237 City of Palm Desert Shadow Ridge Project, PP 23-0023/VTTM 38866 SECTION 15183 ANALYSIS TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES Page 61 c) Require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment? LTS  ☐ - LTS d) Expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes? LTS  ☐ - LTS SUBSTANTIATION: Palm Desert General Plan EIR; and Draft Technical Background Report Background The General Plan Update EIR evaluated potential issue impacts on a City-wide basis on page 4.8-15 in the Hazards Section of the General Plan EIR. The General Plan EIR evaluated the wildfire issue, and concluded future City growth would expose more people to wildfire hazards, with no mitigation measures, and would pose a less than significant impact on the City’s exposure to wildfire hazards. Based on implementation of the General Plan Update policies and actions and enforcement of existing rules, including the City’s requirement to conduct CEQA review for each future project, potential wildfire impacts under this issue were concluded to be a less than significant impact. Thus, the impact of increasing potential exposure to wildfire hazards in the City would be a less than significant impact. Project specific findings on these public service issues are presented in the following evaluation. a. Less Than Significant Impact – The proposed project is located on Shadow Ridge Road, an important local roadway but not considered a road that is essential to provide City-wide emergency responses or evacuations. During construction, the proposed project will interfere with the flow of traffic, including emergency responses during construction activities on Shadow Ridge Road and possibly on Gerald Ford where it intersects with Shadow Ridge. To ensure effective management of traffic flow in general, and emergency vehicle access specifically, during construction, the applicant shall prepare and have the City approve a traffic management plan which is consistent with the General Plan policies. With implementation of this General Plan requirement potential impacts under this issue will be less than significant. b. Less Than Significant Impact – The project site is located within the “Urban Unzoned” area of wildfire hazards based on Figure 8.2 of the Draft Technical Background Report. Due to the site’s location at some distance from any high fire hazard severity areas and on essentially flat land, the potential for the development the potential to expose project occupants to pollutants or uncontrolled spread of a wildfire is minimal, i.e., less than significant. c. No Impact – The infrastructure that will be installed in support of the proposed project will all occur within already disturbed areas and will not exacerbate wildfire risk or cause any temporary or ongoing significant impact to the environment. d. No Impact – The project site is not exposed to significant risks due to the site’s flat topography; lack of exposure to flood hazards. As a result, no adverse impacts to people or structures will result from implementing the proposed project. The project site is not located in a high or severe wildfire hazard area. The findings above are consistent with the findings in the General Plan EIR. The type and intensity of use proposed as part of the proposed 238 City of Palm Desert Shadow Ridge Project, PP 23-0023/VTTM 38866 SECTION 15183 ANALYSIS TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES Page 62 project is consistent with the development anticipated, analyzed, and approved as part of the adopted General Plan Update and evaluated in the General Plan Update EIR. Approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map 38866 does not result in any new significant impacts peculiar to the project or property, result in a substantial increase in the severity of wildfire impacts (evaluated in the 2016 EIR; see Hazards), or result in any offsite or cumulative impacts that would render Section 15183 inapplicable to the project. Mandatory Findings of Significance Would the Project: General Plan EIR Findings General Plan EIR Findings: Project Conclusions: Equal or Less Severe New or Substantial Increase in Severity Applicable Standards and Requirements Resulting Level of Significance a) Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? LTS  ☐ - LTS b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable” means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? LTS  ☐ - LTS c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? LTS  ☐ - LTS The analysis in this Section 15183 analysis and the findings reached indicate that the proposed project can be implemented without causing any new project specific or cumulatively considerable potential or unavoidable significant adverse environmental impacts. All of the findings in this analysis indicate that the proposed project can be developed and be fully consistent with the findings of the General Plan EIR. No mitigation is required to control a few potential environmental impacts of the proposed project to a less than significant impact level, because existing regulations or City policies full offset these impacts without imposing mitigation measures. The following findings are based on this analysis of all environmental topics and the implementation of the mitigation measures identified in the previous text and summarized following this section. a. Less Than Significant Impact– The project has no potential to cause a significant impact to any biological or cultural resources. The project has been identified as having no potential to degrade the quality of the natural environment, substantially reduce habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal 239 City of Palm Desert Shadow Ridge Project, PP 23-0023/VTTM 38866 SECTION 15183 ANALYSIS TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES Page 63 community, or reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal. The project requires implementation of General Plan policies or existing laws and regulations to control significant biological resource impacts from occurring as a result of implementation of the project. Based on the data contained in the Cultural Resources Report (Appendix 3), the potential for impacting cultural resources is low, particularly with the extensive General Plan measures that shall be implemented to minimize impacts due to accidental exposure of subsurface cultural resources. The Cultural Resources Report determined that no cultural resources of importance were found at the project site upon field review and a review of previous reports performed for this area, so it is not anticipated that any resources could be affected by the project because no cultural resources exist. b. Less Than Significant Impact – The project has eighteen (18) potential impacts that are individually limited, but may be cumulatively considerable that have all been addressed in the General Plan EIR. The issues of Air Quality, Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Geology and Soils, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, Hydrology and Water Quality, Noise, Public Services (parks), Transportation, Tribal Cultural Resources, and Wildfire require compliance with General Plan policies and measures, but not any new mitigation measures are required to reduce impacts to a less than significant level and ensure that cumulative effects are not cumulatively considerable. The project is not considered growth-inducing, as defined by State CEQA Guidelines, as it would develop fewer new residences than currently authorized. All other environmental issues were found to have no significant project specific and cumulative impacts without implementation of mitigation. The potential cumulative environmental effects of implementing the proposed project have been determined to be less than considerable, and thus, would have a less than significant cumulative impact. c. Less Than Significant Impact – The project will achieve long-term benefit to the approved Marriott Resort project by developing one of the last remaining undeveloped portions of the site after 26 years. The short-term impacts associated with the project, which are mainly construction-related impacts, are less than significant with implementation of existing rules, regulations and General Plan policies. The issues of Air Quality, Geology and Soils, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, Hydrology and Water Quality, and Noise require the implementation of these requirements to reduce human impacts to a less than significant level. All other environmental issues were found to have no significant impacts on humans without implementation of mitigation. The potential for direct human effects from implementing the proposed project have been determined to be less than significant. Conclusion This document evaluated all CEQA issues contained in the latest Initial Study Checklist form. The evaluation determined that either no impact or less than significant impacts would be associated with the issues of Aesthetics, Agricultural and Forestry Resources, Energy. Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Land Use and Planning, Mineral Resources, Population/Housing, and Utilities and Service Systems, Air Quality, Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Geology and Soils, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, Hydrology and Water Quality, Noise, Public Services (Parks), Transportation, and Wildfire. The type and intensity of use proposed as part of the proposed project is consistent with the development anticipated, analyzed, and approved as part of the adopted General Plan Update and evaluated in the General Plan Update EIR. There are no new significant impacts peculiar to the project or property. Additionally, the project will not result in a substantial increase in the severity of the impacts previously evaluated for the development of the Shadow Ridge resort project in the General Plan EIR. Table Compliance with CEQA Section 15183 240 City of Palm Desert Shadow Ridge Project, PP 23-0023/VTTM 38866 SECTION 15183 ANALYSIS TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES Page 64 Environmental Resource Topic (b)(1) Impacts potentially peculiar to the project or parcel? (b)(2) Impacts analyzed as significant effects in a prior EIR on the zoning action, general plan or community plan, with which the project is consistent? (b)(3) Potentially significant off-site or cumulative impacts not discussed in the prior EIR? (b)(4) Substantial new information showing a more severe adverse impact than in the prior EIR? (c) Impact is not peculiar to parcel or project, has been addressed as a significant effect in the prior EIR, or can be substantially mitigated by the imposition of uniformly applied development policies or standards? Aesthetics No Yes No No Yes Agriculture & Forestry Resources No Yes No No Yes Air Quality No Yes No No Yes Biological Resources No Yes No No Yes Cultural Resources No Yes No No Yes Geology & Soils No Yes No No Yes Greenhouse Gas Emissions No Yes No No Yes Hazards & Hazardous Materials No Yes No No Yes Hydrology & Water Quality No Yes No No Yes Land Use & Planning No Yes No No Yes Mineral Resources No Yes No No Yes Noise No Yes No No Yes Population & Housing No Yes No No Yes Public Services No Yes No No Yes Recreation No Yes No No Yes Transportation No Yes No No Yes Utilities & Service Systems No Yes No No Yes Wildfire No Yes No No Yes 241 City of Palm Desert Shadow Ridge Project, PP 23-0023/VTTM 38866 SECTION 15183 ANALYSIS TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES Page 65 __________ Note: Authority cited: Sections 21083 and 21083.05, Public Resources Code. Reference: Section 65088.4, Gov. Code; Sections 21080(c), 21080.1, 21080.3, 21083, 21083.05, 21083.3, 21093, 21094, 21095, and 21151, Public Resources Code; Sundstrom v. County of Mendocino,(1988) 202 Cal.App.3d 296; Leonoff v. Monterey Board of Supervisors, (1990) 222 Cal.App.3d 1337; Eureka Citizens for Responsible Govt. v. City of Eureka (2007) 147 Cal.App.4th 357; Protect the Historic Amador Waterways v. Amador Water Agency (2004) 116 Cal.App.4th at 1109; San Franciscans Upholding the Downtown Plan v. City and County of San Francisco (2002) 102 Cal.App.4th 656. Revised 2019 Authority: Public Resources Code sections 21083 and 21083.09 Reference: Public Resources Code sections 21073, 21074, 21080.3.1, 21080.3.2, 21082.3/ 21084.2 and 21084.3 242 City of Palm Desert Shadow Ridge Project, PP 23-0023/VTTM 38866 SECTION 15183 ANALYSIS TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES Page 66 REFERENCES City of Palm Desert General Plan adopted November 10, 2016 ECORP Consulting, Inc., “Final Program Environmental Impact Report for Coachella Valley Water District Sanitation Master Plan Update 2020” dated November 2022 Hillman Consulting, “Phase I Environmental Site Assessment” dated October 4, 2023 Jennings Environmental, LLC, “Biological Resources Assessment, Jurisdictional Delineation, and CVMSHCP Consistency Analysis for the Shadow Ridge Development, City of Palm Desert, Riverside County, California” dated December 2023 LGC Valley, Inc., Geotechnical Consulting, “Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Report for the Proposed Shadow Ridge Residential Development, Tract 14670, City of Palm Desert, California” dated November 10, 2023 Michael Baker International, “City of Palm Desert General Plan Update & University Neighborhood Specific Plan, Draft Environmental Impact Report” dated August 2016 Mojave Archaeological Consulting, LLC, “Cultural Resources Assessment for Shadow Ridge Project TTM 28818-1” dated December 2023 Urban Crossroads, “Shadow Ridge Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas & Energy Assessment” dated March 12, 2024 Urban Crossroads, “Shadow Ridge Trip Generation Assessment” dated November 22, 2023 Urban Crossroads, “Shadow Ridge Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Screening Evaluation” dated November 21, 2023 Water Systems Consulting, Inc., “2020 Coachella Valley Regional Urban Water Management Plan” dated June 30, 2021 Wilson Mikami Corporation, “Project Specific Water Quality Management Plan for Vesting Tentative Tract 38866” dated October 12, 2023 243 City of Palm Desert Shadow Ridge Project, PP 23-0023/VTTM 38866 SECTION 15183 ANALYSIS TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES FIGURES 244 FIGURE 1 Tom Dodson & Associates Environmental Consultants Regional Location Map 245 FIGURE 2 Tom Dodson & Associates Environmental Consultants Site Location Map (USGS) Site Location 246 FIGURE 3 Tom Dodson & Associates Environmental Consultants Site Location Map (Aerial) 247 FIGURE 4 Tom Dodson & Associates Environmental Consultants CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN 248 FIGURE 5 Tom Dodson & Associates Environmental Consultants PROPOSED LAYOUT 249 FIGURE IX-1 Tom Dodson & Associates Environmental Consultants GeoTracker 250 SOURCE: City of Palm Desert General Plan, Adopted November 2016 FIGURE X-1 Tom Dodson & Associates Environmental Consultants CITY GENERAL PLAN FLOOD HAZARD OVERLAY 251 SOURCE: City of Palm Desert General Plan Update, DEIR, August 2016 FIGURE XII-1 Tom Dodson & Associates Environmental Consultants MINERAL RESOURCE ZONE 252 SOURCE: City of Palm Desert General Plan Update, DEIR, August 2016 FIGURE XIII-1 Tom Dodson & Associates Environmental Consultants EXISTING NOISE CONTOURS 253 SOURCE: City of Palm Desert General Plan Update, DEIR, August 2016 FIGURE XIII-2 Tom Dodson & Associates Environmental Consultants FUTURE NOISE CONTOURS 254 SOURCE: Wilson Mikami Corporation FIGURE XIX-1 Tom Dodson & Associates Environmental Consultants WATER AND SEWER LINES 255 SOURCE: City of Palm Desert General Plan, November 2016 FIGURE XX-1 Tom Dodson & Associates Environmental Consultants FIRE HAZARD SEVERITY ZONES 256 City of Palm Desert Shadow Ridge Project, PP 23-0023/VTTM 38866 SECTION 15183 ANALYSIS TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES APPENDIX 1 257 DATE: March 12, 2024 TO: Tom Dodson, Tom Dodson & Associates FROM: Haseeb Qureshi Ali Dadabhoy JOB NO: 15742-02 AQ, GHG & EA Assessment SHADOW RIDGE AIR QUALITY, GREENHOUSE GAS & ENERGY ASSESSMENT Tom Dodson, Urban Crossroads, Inc. is pleased to provide the following Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas & Energy Assessment for the Shadow Ridge (Project), which is located at 9003 Shadow Ridge Road which is east of Monterey Avenue and north of Frank Sinatra Drive in the City of Palm Desert. PROJECT OVERVIEW The Project is the remaining Parcel 4 and Parcel 5 of Tract 28818-1 on the Shadow Ridge Golf Course. It is our understanding that the Project consists of 93 single family detached residential dwelling units (see Exhibit 1). The proposed Project is anticipated to have an opening year of 2028. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Results of the assessment indicate that the Project would result in a less than significant impact with respect to air quality, greenhouse gases and energy and no mitigation is required. 258 Tom Dodson, Tom Dodson & Associates March 12, 2024 Page 2 of 38 Appendix 1 (15742-02 AQ, GHG & EA Assessment).docx EXHIBIT 1: PROJECT’S TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 259 Tom Dodson, Tom Dodson & Associates March 12, 2024 Page 3 of 38 Appendix 1 (15742-02 AQ, GHG & EA Assessment).docx PROJECT AIR QUALITY IMPACTS AIR QUALITY SETTING SALTON SEA AIR BASIN (SSAB) The Project site is located within the Salton Sea Air Basin (SSAB) within the jurisdiction of the SCAQMD. The SSAB (also referred to herein as “the Basin”) is aligned in a north -west-southwest orientation stretching from Banning Pass to the Mexican border. The regional climate, as well as the temperature, wind, humidity, precipitation, and amount of sunshine significantly influence the air quality in the Basin. The climate of the Coachella Valley is a continental, desert-type climate, with hot summers, mild winters, and very little annual rainfall. Precipitation is less than six inches annually and occurs mostly in the winter months from active frontal systems and in the late summer months from thunderstorms. Almost all of the annual rainfall comes from the fringes of mid-latitude storms from late November to early April with summers often being completely dry. Temperatures exceed 100 degrees Fahrenheit (°F), on average, for four months each year, with daily highs near 110 °F during July and August. Summer nights are cooler with minimum temperatures in the mid-70s. During the winter season, daytime highs are quite mild, but the dry air is conducive to nocturnal radiational cooling, with early morning lows around 40 °F. The Coachella Valley and adjacent areas are exposed to frequent gusty winds. The flat terrain of the valley and strong temperature differentials, created by intense solar heating, produce moderate winds and deep thermal convection. Wind speeds exceeding 31 miles per hour (mph) occur most frequently in April and May. On an annual basis, strong winds (greater than 31 mph) are observed 0.6 percent of the time and speeds of less than 6.8 mph account for more than one- half of the observed winds. Prevailing winds are from the northwest through southwest, with secondary flows from the southeast. The strongest and most persistent winds typically occur immediately to the east of Banning Pass, which is noted as a wind power generation resource area. Aside from this locale, the wind conditions in the remainder of the Coachella Valley are geographically distinct. Stronger winds tend to occur closer to the foothills. Less frequently, widespread gusty winds occur over all areas of the Valley. Portions of the SSAB experience surface inversions almost every day of the year. Inversions in the SSAB are attributed to strong surface heating, but are usually broken, allowing pollutants to disperse more easily. Weak surface inversions are caused by c ooling of air in contact with the cold surface of the earth at night. In the valleys and low-lying areas, this condition is intensified by the addition of cold air flowing downslope from the hills and pooling on the valley floor. In addition, inversions in the SSAB caused by the presence of the Pacific high-pressure cell can cause the air mass aloft to sink. As the air descends, compressional heating warms the air to a temperature higher than the air below. This subsidence inversion can act as a nearly impenetrable lid to the vertical mixing of pollutants. These inversions can persist for one or more days, causing air stagnation and the buildup of pollutants. Subsidence inversions are common from November through June and are relatively absent from July through October. 260 Tom Dodson, Tom Dodson & Associates March 12, 2024 Page 4 of 38 Appendix 1 (15742-02 AQ, GHG & EA Assessment).docx Within the Project area, there is a natural sand migration process, called “blowsand,” that has direct and indirect effects on air quality. Blowsand produces particulate matter (PM 10) in two ways: (1) by direct particle erosion and fragmentation as natural PM 10, and (2) by secondary effects, as sand deposits on road surfaces. Also, where water has already receded around the Salton Sea, the surface areas contain a salty mix of sediments that can change from a hardened salt crust to a fluffy soft layer of dust depending upon the season. Exposed sediments could elevate PM10 levels throughout the region. Almost 120,000 acres of Salton Sea lakebed could be exposed as inflows to the Sea decrease in future years. Local communities may be affected by 60,000 potentially dust-blowing acres, which will cause PM10 levels to rise. Criteria Pollutants Both the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the California Air Resources Board (CARB) have established ambient air quality standards for common pollutants. These ambient air quality standards are levels of contaminants representing safe levels that avoid specific adverse health effects associated with each pollutant. The ambient air quality standards cover what are called “criteria” pollutants because the health and other effects of each pollutant are described in criteria documents. The six criteria pollutants are ozone (O3) (precursor emissions include NOx and reactive organic gases (ROG), CO, particulate matter (PM), nitrogen dioxide (NO 2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), and lead. Areas that meet ambient air quality standards are classified as attainment areas, while areas that do not meet these standards are classified as nonattainment areas. The Riverside County portion of the SSAB is designated as a nonattainment area for the federal O3 and PM2.5 standards and is also a nonattainment area for the state standards for O3, PM10, and PM2.5. Sensitive Receptor Locations Some people are especially sensitive to air pollution and are given special consideration when evaluating air quality impacts from projects. These groups of people include children, the elderly, and individuals with pre-existing respiratory or cardiovascular illness. Structures that house these persons or places where they gather are defined as “sensitive receptors”. These structures typically include uses such as residences, hotels, and hospitals where an individual can remain for 24 hours. Consistent with the LST Methodology, the nearest land use where an individual could remain for 24 hours to the Project site has been used to determine construction and operational air quality impacts for emissions of PM10 and PM2.5, since PM10 and PM2.5 thresholds are based on a 24-hour averaging time. Receptors in the Project study area are described below. All distances are measured from the Project site boundary to the outdoor living areas (e.g., backyards) or at the building façade, whichever is closer to the Project site. Receptors in the Project study area are shown on Exhibit 2 under the Localized Construction Emissions section later in the report. • Receptor R1 represents Marriott Shadow Ridge building at 9001 Shadow Ridge Rd, approximately 386 feet north of the Project site. • Receptor R2 represents the Riverside County Sheriff Department at 73705 Gerald Ford Dr, approximately 555 feet northeast of the Project site. 261 Tom Dodson, Tom Dodson & Associates March 12, 2024 Page 5 of 38 Appendix 1 (15742-02 AQ, GHG & EA Assessment).docx • Receptor R3 represents the existing residence at 73500 Woodward Dr, approximately 1,028 feet southeast of the Project site. • Receptor R4 represents the Mariott Shadow Ridge at 1600 Fairway Dunes Dr, approximately 747 feet west of the Project site. • Receptor R5 represents Marriott's Shadow Ridge I-The Villages at 10938 West Pico Boulevard, approximately 710 feet east of the Project site. REGULATORY BACKGROUND FEDERAL REGULATIONS The EPA is responsible for setting and enforcing the national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for O3, CO, NOX, SO2, PM10, and lead (Pb) (5). The EPA has jurisdiction over emissions sources that are under the authority of the federal government including aircraft, locomotives, and emissions sources outside state waters (Outer Continental Shelf). The EPA also establishes emission standards for vehicles sold in states other than California. Automobiles sold in California must meet the stricter emission requirements of CARB. The Federal Clean Air Act (CAA) was first enacted in 1955 and has been amended numerous times in subsequent years (1963, 1965, 1967, 1970, 1977, and 1990). The CAA establishes the federal air quality standards, the NAAQS, and specifies future dates for achieving compliance (6). The CAA also mandates that each state submit and implement state implementation plans (SIPs) for local areas not meeting these standards. These plans must include pollution control measures that demonstrate how the standards will be met. The 1990 amendments to the CAA that identify specific emission reduction goals for areas not meeting the NAAQS require a demonstration of reasonable further progress toward attainment and incorporate additional sanctions for failure to attain or to meet interim milestones. The sections of the CAA most directly applicable to the development of the Project site include Title I (Non-Attainment Provisions) and Title II (Mobile Source Provisions) (7) (8). Title I provisions were established with the goal of attaining the NAAQS for the following criteria pollutants O3, NO2, SO2, PM10, CO, PM2.5, and Pb. The NAAQS were amended in July 1997 to include an additional standard for O3 and to adopt a NAAQS for PM2.5. Mobile source emissions are regulated in accordance with Title II provisions. These provisions require the use of cleaner burning gasoline and other cleaner burning fuels such as methanol and natural gas. Automobile manufacturers are also required to reduce tailpipe emissions of hydrocarbons and NOX. NOX is a collective term that includes all forms of NOX which are emitted as byproducts of the combustion process. CALIFORNIA REGULATIONS CARB The CARB, which became part of the California EPA (CalEPA) in 1991, is responsible for ensuring implementation of the California Clean Air Act (AB 2595), responding to the federal CAA, and for regulating emissions from consumer products and motor vehicles. AB 2595 mandates 262 Tom Dodson, Tom Dodson & Associates March 12, 2024 Page 6 of 38 Appendix 1 (15742-02 AQ, GHG & EA Assessment).docx achievement of the maximum degree of emissions reductions possible from vehicular and other mobile sources in order to attain the state ambient air quality standards by the earliest practical date. The CARB established the California ambient air quality s tandards (CAAQS) for all pollutants for which the federal government has NAAQS and, in addition, establishes standards for SO 4, visibility, hydrogen sulfide (H2S), and vinyl chloride (C2H3Cl). However, at this time, H2S and C2H3Cl are not measured at any monitoring stations in the SSAB because they are not considered to be a regional air quality problem. Generally, the CAAQS are more stringent than the NAAQS (1) (2). Local air quality management districts, such as the SCAQMD, regulate air emissions from stationary sources such as commercial and industrial facilities. All air pollution control districts have been formally designated as attainment or non-attainment for each CAAQS. Serious non-attainment areas are required to prepare Air Quality Management Plans (AQMP) that include specified emission reduction strategies in an effort to meet clean air goals. These plans are required to include: • Application of Best Available Retrofit Control Technology to existing sources; • Developing control programs for area sources (e.g., architectural coatings and solvents) and indirect sources (e.g. motor vehicle use generated by residential and commercial development); • A District permitting system designed to allow no net increase in emissions from any new or modified permitted sources of emissions; • Implementing reasonably available transportation control measures and assuring a substantial reduction in growth rate of vehicle trips and miles traveled; • Significant use of low emissions vehicles by fleet operators; • Sufficient control strategies to achieve a 5% or more annual reduction in emissions or 15% or more in a period of three years for ROGs, NOX, CO and PM10. However, air basins may use alternative emission reduction strategy that achieves a reduction of less than 5% per year under certain circumstances. AQMP Currently, the NAAQS and CAAQS are exceeded in most parts of the SSAB. In response, the SCAQMD has adopted a series of AQMPs to meet the state and federal ambient air quality standards (3). The Coachella Valley PM10 State Implementation Plan (CVSIP) establishes additional controls needed to demonstrate expeditious attainment of the PM10 standards in the Coachella Valley, located in the Salton Sea Air Basin. This area which is under South Coast AQMD's jurisdiction has been designated as a serious non-attainment area for PM10. AQMPs are updated regularly in order to more effectively reduce emissions, accommodate growth, and to minimize any negative fiscal impacts of air pollution control on the economy. A detailed discussion on the AQMP and Project consistency with the AQMP is provided on Page 13. 263 Tom Dodson, Tom Dodson & Associates March 12, 2024 Page 7 of 38 Appendix 1 (15742-02 AQ, GHG & EA Assessment).docx APPLICABLE REGULATORY REQUIRMENTS SCAQMD Rules that are currently applicable during construction activity for this Project include but are not limited to Rule 403 (Fugitive Dust), Rule 445 (Wood Burning Devices), and Rule 1113 (Architectural Coatings) (4) (5) (6). SCAQMD Rule 403 This rule is intended to reduce the amount of particulate matter entrained in the ambient air as a result of anthropogenic (human-made) fugitive dust sources by requiring actions to prevent and reduce fugitive dust emissions. Rule 403 applies to any activity or human-made condition capable of generating fugitive dust and requires best available control measures to be applied to earth moving and grading activities. This rule is intended to reduce PM 10 emissions from any transportation, handling, construction, or storage activity that has the potential to generate fugitive dust. PM10 suppression techniques are summarized below. • Portions of a construction site to remain inactive longer than a period of three months will be seeded and watered until grass cover is grown or otherwise stabilized. • All onsite roads will be paved as soon as feasible or watered periodically or chemically stabilized. • All material transported offsite will be either sufficiently watered or securely covered to prevent excessive amounts of dust. • The area disturbed by clearing, grading, earthmoving, or excavation operations will be minimized at all times. • Where vehicles leave a construction site and enter adjacent public streets, the streets will be swept daily or washed down at the end of the workday to remove soil tracked onto the paved surface. SCAQMD Rule 445 This rule is intended to reduce the emission of particulate matter from wood -burning devices. The Project is required to comply with SCAQMD Rule 445, which prohibits the use of wood burning stoves and fireplaces in new development. SCAQMD Rule 1113 This rule serves to limit the volatile organic compound (VOC) content of architectural coatings used on projects in the SCAQMD. Any person who supplies, sells, offers for sale, or manufactures any architectural coating for use on projects in the SCAQMD must comply with the current VOC standards set in this rule. METHODOLOGY In May 2022, the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA) in conjunction with other California air districts, including SCAQMD, released the latest version of the CalEEMod Version 2022.1.1.21. The purpose of this model is to calculate construction-source and operational-source criteria pollutant (VOCs, NOX, SOX, CO, PM10, and PM2.5) and GHG emissions from direct and indirect sources; and quantify applicable air quality and GHG reductions achieved 264 Tom Dodson, Tom Dodson & Associates March 12, 2024 Page 8 of 38 Appendix 1 (15742-02 AQ, GHG & EA Assessment).docx from mitigation measures (7). Accordingly, the latest version of CalEEMod has been used for this Project to determine construction and operational air quality and greenhouse gas emissions. Standards of Significance The criteria used to determine the significance of potential Project-related air quality impacts are taken from the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines (CEQA Guidelines) (14 CCR §§15000, et seq.). Based on these thresholds, a project would result in a significant impact related to air quality if it would (8): • Threshold 1: Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan. • Threshold 2: Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is in non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard. • Threshold 3: Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. • Threshold 4: Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people. AIR QUALITY REGIONAL EMISSIONS THRESHOLDS The SCAQMD has developed regional significance thresholds for criteria pollutants, as summarized at Table 1 (9).The SCAQMD’s CEQA Air Quality Significance Thresholds (March 2023) indicate that any projects in the Salton Sea Air Basin (SSAB) with daily emissions that exceed any of the indicated thresholds should be considered as having an individually and cumulatively significant air quality impact. TABLE 1: MAXIMUM DAILY REGIONAL EMISSIONS THRESHOLDS Pollutant Construction Operations NOX 100 lbs/day 55 lbs/day VOC 75 lbs/day 55 lbs/day PM10 150 lbs/day 150 lbs/day PM2.5 55 lbs/day 55 lbs/day SOX 150 lbs/day 150 lbs/day CO 550 lbs/day 550 lbs/day lbs/day – Pounds Per Day AIR QUALITY LOCALIZED EMISSIONS THRESHOLDS For this Project, the appropriate SRA for the LST analysis is the SCAQMD Coachella Valley monitoring station (SRA 30). LSTs apply to CO, NO2, PM10, and PM2.5. The SCAQMD produced look- up tables for projects less than or equal to 5 acres in size. The SCAQMD’s screening look-up tables are utilized in determining localized impacts. It should be noted that since the look-up tables identify thresholds at only 1 acre, 2 acres, and 5 acres, linear regression has been utilized to determine localized significance thresholds. Consistent with SCAQMD guidance, the thresholds 265 Tom Dodson, Tom Dodson & Associates March 12, 2024 Page 9 of 38 Appendix 1 (15742-02 AQ, GHG & EA Assessment).docx presented in Table 2 were calculated by interpolating the threshold values for the Project’s disturbed acreage. The acres disturbed is based on the equipment list and days in the demolition, site preparation, and grading phase according to the anticipated maximum number of acres a given piece of equipment can pass over in an 8-hour workday. The equipment-specific grading rates are summarized in the CalEEMod user’s guide, Appendix A: Calculation Details for CalEEMod (10). It should be noted that the disturbed area per day is representative of a piece of equipment making multiple passes over the same land area. In other words, one Rubber Tired Dozer can make multiple passes over the same land area totaling 0.5 acres in a given 8-hour day. Appendix A of the CalEEMod User Manual only identifies equipment-specific grading rates for Crawler Tractors, Graders, Rubber Tired Dozers, and Scrapers. For analytical purposes, emissions associated with peak, site preparation, and grading activities are considered for purposes of localized significance thresholds (LSTs) since this phase represents the maximum localized emissions that would occur. The Project’s construction activities could disturb a maximum of approximately, 0.5 acre per day for site preparation, and 3 acres per day for grading activities. Any other construction phases of development would result in lesser emissions and consequently lesser impacts than what is disclosed herein. As such, Table 2 presents thresholds for localized construction emissions. TABLE 2: MAXIMUM DAILY LOCALIZED EMISSIONS THRESHOLDS Source Activity Emissions (lbs/day) NOx CO PM10 PM2.5 Construction Site Preparation 234 lbs/day 2,678 lbs/day 77 lbs/day 23 lbs/day Grading 361 lbs/day 4,778 lbs/day 99 lbs/day 32 lbs/day 1Source of localized significance threshold (LSTs) is provided on page 13. REGIONAL CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS SUMMARY The estimated maximum daily construction emissions without mitigation are summarized on Table 3. Detailed construction model outputs are presented in Attachment A. Under the assumed scenarios, emissions resulting from the Project construction will not exceed thresholds established by the SCAQMD for emissions of any criteria pollutant and no mitigation is required. TABLE 3: OVERALL REGIONAL CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS SUMMARY Source Emissions (lbs/day) VOC NOX CO SOX PM10 PM2.5 Summer 2024 1.03 7.87 13.30 0.02 0.99 0.46 2025 2.67 2.77 5.78 0.01 0.71 0.24 2026 2.66 2.67 5.52 0.01 0.70 0.23 2027 2.64 2.60 5.29 0.01 0.70 0.23 266 Tom Dodson, Tom Dodson & Associates March 12, 2024 Page 10 of 38 Appendix 1 (15742-02 AQ, GHG & EA Assessment).docx Source Emissions (lbs/day) VOC NOX CO SOX PM10 PM2.5 Winter 2024 4.23 42.94 33.97 0.08 8.95 4.00 2025 2.86 28.10 23.50 0.07 6.57 2.52 2026 2.64 2.81 4.24 0.01 0.71 0.24 2027 2.63 2.71 4.09 0.01 0.70 0.23 2028 2.62 2.64 3.94 0.01 0.70 0.23 Maximum Daily Emissions 4.23 42.94 33.97 0.08 8.95 4.00 SCAQMD Regional Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55 Threshold Exceeded? NO NO NO NO NO NO 1PM10 and PM2.5 source emissions reflect 3x daily watering per SCAQMD Rule 403 for fugitive dust. REGIONAL OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS Operational activities associated with the Project would result in emissions of CO, VOCs, NOX, SOX, PM10, and PM2.5. Operational related emissions are expected from the following primary sources: area source emissions, energy source emissions, and mobile source emissions, The Project related operational air quality impacts derive primarily from vehicle trips generated by the Project. Trip characteristics available from the Shadow Ridge Trip Generation Assessment was utilized in this analysis (11). The estimated operation-source emissions from the Project are summarized on Table 4. Detailed operation model outputs are presented in Attachment A. As shown on Table 4, operational- source emissions would not exceed the applicable SCAQMD regional thresholds for emissions of any criteria pollutant and no mitigation is required. TABLE 4: TOTAL PROJECT REGIONAL OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS Source Emissions (lbs/day) VOC NOX CO SOX PM10 PM2.5 Summer Mobile Source 3.21 3.41 35.77 0.09 7.88 2.04 Area Source 5.53 1.44 5.88 0.01 0.11 0.11 Energy Source 0.05 0.84 0.36 0.01 0.07 0.07 Total Maximum Daily Emissions 8.79 5.68 42.01 0.11 8.06 2.22 SCAQMD Regional Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55 Threshold Exceeded? NO NO NO NO NO NO 267 Tom Dodson, Tom Dodson & Associates March 12, 2024 Page 11 of 38 Appendix 1 (15742-02 AQ, GHG & EA Assessment).docx Source Emissions (lbs/day) VOC NOX CO SOX PM10 PM2.5 Winter Mobile Source 2.63 3.70 23.97 0.08 7.88 2.04 Area Source 5.07 1.39 0.59 0.01 0.11 0.11 Energy Source 0.05 0.84 0.36 0.01 0.07 0.07 Total Maximum Daily Emissions 7.75 5.93 24.91 0.09 8.06 2.22 SCAQMD Regional Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55 Threshold Exceeded? NO NO NO NO NO NO SENSITIVE RECEPTORS The analysis uses the methodology included in the SCAQMD Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology (LST Methodology) (12). The SCAQMD has established that impacts to air quality are significant if there is a potential to contribute or cause localized exceedances of the federal and/or state ambient air quality standards (NAAQS/CAAQS). Collectively, these are referred to as Localized Significance Thresholds (LSTs). The SCAQMD established LSTs in response to the SCAQMD Governing Board’s Environmental Justice Initiative I-41. LSTs represent the maximum emissions from a project that will not cause or contribute to an exceedance of the most stringent applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard at the sensitive receptor. The SCAQMD states that lead agencies can use the LSTs as another indicator of significance in its air quality impact analyses. The SCAQMD recommends that the nearest sensitive receptor be considered when determining the Project’s potential to cause an individual or cumulatively significant impact. The nearest land use where an individual could remain for 24 hours to the Project site has been used to determine localized construction and operational air quality impacts for emissions of PM 10 and PM2.5 (since PM10 and PM2.5 thresholds are based on a 24-hour averaging time). The nearest receptor used for evaluation of localized impacts of PM10 and PM2.5 is location R1 represented by the Marriott Shadow Ridge building at 9001 Shadow Ridge Rd, approximately 386 feet (118 meters) north of the Project site. As such, for evaluation of localized PM10 and PM2.5, a 118-meter distance will be used. Receptors in the Project study area shown on Exhibit 2. As previously stated, and consistent with LST Methodology, the nearest industrial/commercial use to the Project site is used to determine construction and operational LST air impacts for emissions of NOX and CO as the averaging periods for these pollutants are shorter (8 hours or less) and it is reasonable to assume that an individual could be present at these sites for periods 1 The purpose of SCAQMD’s Environmental Justice program is to ensure that everyone has the right to equal protection from air pollution and fair access to the decision-making process that works to improve the quality of air within their communities. Further, the SCAQMD defines Environmental Justice as “…equitable environmental policymaking and enforcement to protect the health of all residents, regardless of age, culture, ethnicity, gender, race, socioeconomic status, or geographic location, from the health effects of air pollution.” 268 Tom Dodson, Tom Dodson & Associates March 12, 2024 Page 12 of 38 Appendix 1 (15742-02 AQ, GHG & EA Assessment).docx of one to 8 hours. The nearest receptor used for evaluation of localized impacts of NOx and CO is location R5 represented by Marriott's Shadow Ridge I-The Villages at 10938 West Pico Boulevard, approximately 710 feet (216 meters) east of the Project site. As such, for evaluation of localized NOx and CO, a 216-meter distance will be used. EXHIBIT 2: SENSITIVE RECEPTOR LOCATIONS 269 Tom Dodson, Tom Dodson & Associates March 12, 2024 Page 13 of 38 Appendix 1 (15742-02 AQ, GHG & EA Assessment).docx LOCALIZED CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS Table 5 identifies the localized impacts at the nearest receptor location in the vicinity of the Project. Outputs from the model runs for construction LSTs are provided in Attachment A. For analytical purposes, emissions associated with peak site preparation and grading activities are considered for purposes of LSTs since these phases represents the maximum localized emissions that would occur. Any other construction phases of development that overlap would result in lesser emissions and consequently lesser impacts than what is disclosed herein. As shown in Table 5, emissions resulting from the construction will not exceed the numerical thresholds of significance established by the SCAQMD for any criteria pollutant. Thus, a less than significant impact would occur for localized Project-related construction-source emissions and no mitigation is required. TABLE 5: PROJECT LOCALIZED CONSTRUCTION IMPACTS On-Site Emissions Emissions (lbs/day) NOX CO PM10 PM2.5 Site Preparation Maximum Daily Emissions 10.38 8.42 2.17 1.30 SCAQMD Localized Threshold 234 2,678 83 26 Threshold Exceeded? NO NO NO NO Grading Maximum Daily Emissions 30.20 24.32 6.09 2.50 SCAQMD Localized Threshold 361 4,778 104 36 Threshold Exceeded? NO NO NO NO LOCALIZED OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS The proposed project consists of 93 single family detached residential dwelling units . According to SCAQMD LST methodology, LSTs would apply to the operational phase of a proposed project, if the project includes stationary sources, or attracts mobile sources that may spend long periods queuing and idling at the site (e.g., transfer facilities and warehouse buildings). The proposed project does not include such uses, and thus, due to the lack of significant stationary source emissions, no LST analysis is needed for operations. AIR QUALITY IMPACTS – CONSISTENCY WITH THRESHOLD NO. 1 Would the Project conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? The Project site is located within the SSAB and is subject to SCAQMD’s 2022 AQMP and the 2003 CV PM10 SIP. The SCAQMD has jurisdiction over an approximately 10,743 square-mile area consisting of the four-county Basin and the Los Angeles County and Riverside County portions of what use to be referred to as the Southeast Desert Air Basin. In these areas, t he SCAQMD is principally responsible for air pollution control, and works directly with the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), county transportation commissions, local governments , as 270 Tom Dodson, Tom Dodson & Associates March 12, 2024 Page 14 of 38 Appendix 1 (15742-02 AQ, GHG & EA Assessment).docx well as state and federal agencies to reduce emissions from stationary, mobile, and indirect sources to meet state and federal ambient air quality standards. Currently, these state and federal air quality standards are exceeded in most parts of the SSAB. In response, the SCAQMD has adopted a series of AQMPs to meet the state and federal ambient air quality standards. AQMPs are updated regularly in order to more effectively reduce emissions, accommodate growth, and to minimize any negative fiscal impacts of air pollution control on the economy. In December 2022, the SCAQMD released the Final 2022 AQMP (2022 AQMP). The 2022 AQMP continues to evaluate current integrated strategies and control measures to meet the CAAQS, as well as explore new and innovative methods to reach its goals. Some of these approaches include utilizing incentive programs, recognizing existing co-benefit programs from other sectors, and developing a strategy with fair-share reductions at the federal, state, and local levels (13). Similar to the 2016 AQMP, the 2022 AQMP incorporates scientific and technological information and planning assumptions, including the 2020-2045 RTP/SCS, a planning document that supports the integration of land use and transportation to help the region meet the federal CAA requirements (14). The Project’s consistency with the AQMP will be determined using the 2022 AQMP as discussed below. SCAG adopted the 2020-2045 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (2020- 2045 RTP/SCS), a planning document that supports the integration of land use and transportation to help the region meet the federal metropolitan planning organization (MPO) requirements under the Sustainable communities and Climate Protection Act. The proposed Project would be developed in accordance with all applicable rules and regulations contained in those plans . Criteria for determining consistency with the AQMP are defined in Chapter 12, Section 12.2 and Section 12.3 of the 1993 CEQA Handbook (18). These indicators are discussed below. The proposed Project will not result in an increase in the frequency or severity of existing air quality violations or cause or contribute to new violations or delay the timely attainment of air quality standards or the interim emissions reductions specifi ed in the AQMP. The violations under this criterion refer to the CAAQS and NAAQS. CAAQS and NAAQS violations would occur if regional or localized significance thresholds were exceeded. CAAQS and NAAQS violations would occur if regional or localized significance thresholds were exceeded. As evaluated, the Project’s regional and localized construction and operational-source emissions would not exceed applicable regional significance thresholds. As such, a less than significant impact is expected. On the basis of the preceding discussion, the Project is determined to be consistent with the first criterion. The Project will not exceed the assumptions in the AQMP based on the years of Project build - out phase. The 2022 AQMP demonstrates that the applicable ambient air quality standards can be achieved within the timeframes required under federal law. Growth projections from local general plans adopted by cities in the district are provided to the SCAG, which develops re gional growth forecasts, which are then used to develop future air quality forecasts for the AQMP. Development 271 Tom Dodson, Tom Dodson & Associates March 12, 2024 Page 15 of 38 Appendix 1 (15742-02 AQ, GHG & EA Assessment).docx consistent with the growth projections in City of Palm Desert General Plan is considered to be consistent with the AQMP. Peak day emissions generated by construction activities are largely independent of land use assignments, but rather are a function of development scope and maximum area of disturbance. Irrespective of the site’s land use designation, development of the s ite to its maximum potential would likely occur, with disturbance of the entire site occurring during construction activities. As such, when considering that no emissions thresholds will be exceeded, a less than significant impact would result. The City of Palm Desert General Plan land use designates the Project site as “Resort & Entertainment” and Planned Residential (PR-5) zoning uses. The “Resort & Entertainment” land use designation allows for up to 10 dwelling unit per acre and provides for a range of entertainment and resort destination uses that require large amounts of land that draws visitors to the City such as hotels, sports and theme park facilities (15). The Planned Residential District (PR-5) zoning use allows for the district is to provide for flexibility in residential development, by encouraging creative and imaginative design, and the development of parcels of land as coordinated projects involving a mixture of residential densities (4.0—40.0 du/ac), mixed housing types, and community facilities. The district is characterized as providing for the optimum integration of urban and natural amenities within developments and is organized around formal, walkable, and highly connected streetscapes. (16) The Project includes the development of 93 single family detached residential dwelling units. The Project’s proposed uses are consistent with the site’s land use designation and zoning designation and a general plan and zoning amendment will not be required. On the basis of the preceding discussion, the Project is determined to be consistent with the second criterion. As the proposed Project is consistent with site’s land use and zoning designation, would not exceed any applicable regional or local thresholds, and would not result in or cause NAAQS or CAAQS violations, the Project is therefore considered to be consistent with the AQMP and a less than significant impact is expected. AIR QUALITY IMPACTS – CONSISTENCY WITH THRESHOLD NO. 2 Would the Project result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is in non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard? The CAAQS designate the Project site as nonattainment for O 3, PM10, and PM2.5 while the NAAQS designates the Project site as nonattainment for O 3 and PM2.5. The SCAQMD has published a report on how to address cumulative impacts from air pollution: White Paper on Potential Control Strategies to Address Cumulative Impacts from Air Pollution (17). In this report the SCAQMD clearly states (Page D-3): “…the SCAQMD uses the same significance thresholds for project specific and cumulative impacts for all environmental topics analyzed in an Environmental Assessment or EIR. The only case where the significance thresholds for project specific and cumulative impacts differ is the 272 Tom Dodson, Tom Dodson & Associates March 12, 2024 Page 16 of 38 Appendix 1 (15742-02 AQ, GHG & EA Assessment).docx Hazard Index (HI) significance threshold for TAC emissions. The project specific (project increment) significance threshold is HI > 1.0 while the cumulative (facility-wide) is HI > 3.0. It should be noted that the HI is only one of three TAC emission significance thresholds considered (when applicable) in a CEQA analysis. The other two are the maximum individual cancer risk (MICR) and the cancer burden, both of which use the same significance thresholds (MICR of 10 in 1 million and cancer burden of 0.5) for project specific and cumulative impacts. Projects that exceed the project-specific significance thresholds are considered by the SCAQMD to be cumulatively considerable. This is the reason project-specific and cumulative significance thresholds are the same. Conversely, projects that do not exceed the project-specific thresholds are generally not considered to be cumulatively significant.” Therefore, this analysis assumes that individual projects that do not generate operational or construction emissions that exceed the SCAQMD’s recommended daily thresholds for project- specific impacts would also not cause a cumulatively considerable increase in emissions for those pollutants for which SSAB is in nonattainment, and, therefore, would not be considered to have a significant, adverse air quality impact. Alternatively, individual project-related construction and operational emissions that exceed SCAQMD thresholds for project-specific impacts would be considered cumulatively considerable. Construction Impacts The Project‐specific evaluation of emissions presented in the preceding analysis demonstrates that proposed Project construction-source air pollutant emissions would not result in exceedances of regional thresholds. Therefore, the proposed Project construction-source emissions would be considered less than significant on a project-specific and cumulative basis. Operational Impacts The Project‐specific evaluation of emissions presented in the preceding analysis demonstrates that proposed Project operational-source air pollutant emissions would not result in exceedances of regional thresholds. Therefore, the proposed Project operational-source emissions would be considered less than significant on a project-specific and cumulative basis. AIR QUALITY IMPACTS – CONSISTENCY WITH THRESHOLD NO. 3 Would the expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? The potential impact of Project-generated air pollutant emissions at sensitive receptors has also been considered. Results of the LST analysis indicate that the Project will not exceed the SCAQMD localized significance thresholds during construction. Therefore, sensitive receptors would not be exposed to substantial pollutant concentrations during Project construction. Additionally, the Project will not exceed the SCAQMD localized significance thresholds during operational activity. Therefore, sensitive receptors would not be exposed to substantial pollutant concentrations as the result of Project operations. 273 Tom Dodson, Tom Dodson & Associates March 12, 2024 Page 17 of 38 Appendix 1 (15742-02 AQ, GHG & EA Assessment).docx CO “HOT SPOT” ANALYSIS As discussed below, the Project would not result in potentially adverse CO concentrations or “hot spots.” An adverse CO concentration, known as a “hot spot”, would occur if an exceedance of the state one-hour standard of 20 ppm or the eight-hour standard of 9 ppm were to occur. It has long been recognized that CO hotspots are caused by vehicular emissions, primarily when idling at congested intersections. In response, vehicle emissions standards have become increasingly stringent in the last twenty years. Currently, the allowable CO emissions standard in California is a maximum of 3.4 grams/mile for passenger cars (there are requirements for certain vehicles that are more stringent). With the turnover of older vehicles, introduction of cleaner fuels, and implementation of increasingly sophisticated and efficient emissions control technologies, CO concentration in the SSAB is now designated as attainment. To establish a more accurate record of baseline CO concentrations affecting the SSAB, a CO “hot spot” analysis was conducted in 2003 for four busy intersections in Los Angeles at the peak morning and afternoon time periods2. This “hot spot” analysis did not predict any exceedance of the 1-hour (20.0 ppm) or 8-hour (9.0 ppm) CO standards, as shown on Table 6. TABLE 6: CO MODEL RESULTS Intersection Location CO Concentrations (ppm) Morning 1-hour Afternoon 1-hour 8-hour Wilshire Boulevard/Veteran Avenue 4.6 3.5 3.7 Sunset Boulevard/Highland Avenue 4 4.5 3.5 La Cienega Boulevard/Century Boulevard 3.7 3.1 5.2 Long Beach Boulevard/Imperial Highway 3 3.1 8.4 Notes: Federal 1-hour standard is 35 ppm and the deferral 8-hour standard is 9.0 ppm. Based on the SCAQMD's 2003 AQMP and the 1992 Federal Attainment Plan for Carbon Monoxide (1992 CO Plan), peak carbon monoxide concentrations in the SSAB were a result of unusual meteorological and topographical conditions and not a result of traffic volumes and congestion at a particular intersection. As evidence of this, for example, of the 8.4 ppm 8-hr CO concentration measured at the Long Beach Blvd. and Imperial Hwy. intersection (i.e., the highest CO generating intersection within the “hot spot” analysis), only 0.7 ppm was attributable to the traffic volumes and congestion at this intersection; the remaining 7.7 ppm were due to the ambient air measurements at the time the 2003 AQMP was prepared (18). In contrast, an adverse CO concentration, known as a “hot spot”, would occur if an exceedance of the state one -hour standard of 20 parts per million (ppm) or the eight-hour standard of 9 ppm were to occur. The ambient 1-hr and 8-hr CO concentration within the Project study area is estimated to be 1.1 ppm and 0.5 ppm, respectively (data from Coachella Valley 1 monitoring station for 2022). Therefore, even if the traffic volumes for the proposed Project were ten times the traffic volumes 2 The CO “hot spot” analysis conducted in 2003 is the most current study used for CO “hot spot” analysis in the SSAB. 274 Tom Dodson, Tom Dodson & Associates March 12, 2024 Page 18 of 38 Appendix 1 (15742-02 AQ, GHG & EA Assessment).docx generated at the Long Beach Blvd. and Imperial Hwy. intersection, due to the on-going improvements in ambient air quality and vehicular emissions controls, the Project would not be capable of resulting in a CO “hot spot” at any study area intersections. As noted above, only 0.7 ppm were attributable to the traffic volumes and congestion at one of the busiest intersections in the SSAB. Therefore if these traffic volumes were multiplied by ten times, it could be expected that the CO attributable to traffic would increase tenfold as well, resulting in 7 ppm – even if this were added to either the 1-hour or 8-hour CO concentrations within the Project study area, this would result in 8.5 ppm and 7.6 ppm for the 1-hr and 8-hr timeframes, respectively. Neither of which would exceed the applicable 1-hr standard of 20 ppm or the 8-hr standard of 9 ppm. Similar considerations are also employed by other Air Districts when evaluating potential CO concentration impacts. More specifically, the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) concludes that under existing and future vehicle emission rates, a given project would have to increase traffic volumes at a single intersection by more than 44,000 vehicles per hour (vph)—or 24,000 vph where vertical and/or horizontal air does not mix —in order to generate a significant CO impact (19). Traffic volumes generating the CO concentrations for the “hot spot” analysis is shown on Table 7. The busiest intersection evaluated was that at Wilshire Boulevard and Veteran Avenue, which had AM/PM traffic volumes of 8,062 vph and 7,719 vph respectivel y (18). TABLE 7: CO MODEL RESULTS Intersection Location Peak Traffic Volumes (vph) Eastbound (AM/PM) Westbound (AM/PM) Southbound (AM/PM) Northbound (AM/PM) Total (AM/PM) Wilshire Boulevard/Veteran Avenue 4,954/2,069 1,830/3,317 721/1,400 560/933 8,062/7,719 Sunset Boulevard/Highland Avenue 1,417/1,764 1,342/1,540 2,304/1,832 1,551/2,238 6,614/5,374 La Cienega Boulevard/Century Boulevard 2,540/2,243 1,890/2,728 1,384/2,029 821/1,674 6,634/8,674 Long Beach Boulevard/Imperial Highway 1,217/2,020 1,760/1,400 479/944 756/1,150 4,212/5,514 AIR QUALITY IMPACTS – CONSISTENCY WITH THRESHOLD NO. 4 Would the Project result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people? The potential for the Project to generate objectionable odors has also been considered. Land uses generally associated with odor complaints include: • Agricultural uses (livestock and farming) • Wastewater treatment plants • Food processing plants • Chemical plants • Composting operations • Refineries 275 Tom Dodson, Tom Dodson & Associates March 12, 2024 Page 19 of 38 Appendix 1 (15742-02 AQ, GHG & EA Assessment).docx • Landfills • Dairies • Fiberglass molding facilities The Project does not contain land uses typically associated with emitting objectionable odors. Potential odor sources associated with the proposed Project may result from construction equipment exhaust and the application of asphalt and architectural coatings during construction activities and the temporary storage of typical solid waste (refuse) associated with the proposed Project’s (long-term operational) uses. Standard construction requirements would minimize odor impacts from construction. The construction odor emissions would be temporary, short-term, and intermittent in nature and would cease upon completion of the respective phase of construction and is thus considered less than significant. It is expected that Project-generated refuse would be stored in covered containers and removed at regular intervals in compliance with the solid waste regulations. The proposed Project would also be required to comply with SCAQMD Rule 402 to prevent occurrences of public nuisances. Therefore, odors associated wit h the proposed Project construction and operations would be less than significant and no mitigation is required (20). APPROVED REGIONAL OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS The site was previously evaluated for 324 timeshare units, which Marriott no longer intends to develop due to the existing inventory levels and reduced demand. The estimated operation- source emissions from the Approved Project are summarized on Table 8. Detailed operation model outputs for the Approved Project are presented in Attachment B. TABLE 8: APPROVED PROJECT REGIONAL OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS Source Emissions (lbs/day) VOC NOX CO SOX PM10 PM2.5 Summer Mobile Source 12.67 13.93 140.73 0.31 25.00 6.49 Area Source 9.93 5.56 20.60 0.04 0.44 0.44 Energy Source 0.10 1.71 0.73 0.01 0.14 0.14 Total Maximum Daily Emissions 22.70 21.19 162.06 0.36 25.58 7.07 SCAQMD Regional Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55 Threshold Exceeded? NO NO NO NO NO NO 276 Tom Dodson, Tom Dodson & Associates March 12, 2024 Page 20 of 38 Appendix 1 (15742-02 AQ, GHG & EA Assessment).docx Source Emissions (lbs/day) VOC NOX CO SOX PM10 PM2.5 Winter Mobile Source 10.06 15.18 93.48 0.28 25.00 6.49 Area Source 8.25 5.37 2.29 0.03 0.43 0.43 Energy Source 0.10 1.71 0.73 0.01 0.14 0.14 Total Maximum Daily Emissions 18.42 22.26 96.50 0.32 25.57 7.07 SCAQMD Regional Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55 Threshold Exceeded? NO NO NO NO NO NO NET OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS – COMPARISON TO APPROVED PROJECT As shown in Table 9, the Proposed Project is anticipated to generate less emissions per day for pollutants of VOC, NOX, CO, SOX, PM10, and PM2.5 as compared to emissions generated by the Approved Project. TABLE 9: PROJECT NET REGIONAL OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS Source Emissions (lbs/day) VOC NOX CO SOX PM10 PM2.5 Summer Proposed Project 8.79 5.68 42.01 0.11 8.06 2.22 Approved Project 22.70 21.19 162.06 0.36 25.58 7.07 Net Emissions (Proposed - Approved) -13.91 -15.51 -120.05 -0.25 -17.52 -4.85 Winter Proposed Project 7.75 5.93 24.91 0.09 8.06 2.22 Approved Project 18.42 22.26 96.50 0.32 25.57 7.07 Net Emissions (Proposed - Approved) -10.67 -16.33 -71.58 -0.23 -17.51 -4.85 PROJECT GHG ANALYSIS CLIMATE CHANGE SETTING Global climate change (GCC) is the change in average meteorological conditions on the earth with respect to temperature, precipitation, and storms. The majority of scientists believe that the climate shift taking place since the Industrial Revolution is occurring at a quicker rate and magnitude than in the past. Scientific evidence suggests that GCC is the result of increased concentrations of GHGs in the earth’s atmosphere, including carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), and fluorinated gases. The majority of scientists believe that this 277 Tom Dodson, Tom Dodson & Associates March 12, 2024 Page 21 of 38 Appendix 1 (15742-02 AQ, GHG & EA Assessment).docx increased rate of climate change is the result of GHGs resulting from human activity and industrialization over the past 200 years. An individual project like the proposed Project evaluated in this memo cannot generate enough GHG emissions to affect a discernible change in global climate. However, the proposed Project may participate in the potential for GCC by its incremental contribution of GHGs combined with the cumulative increase of all other sources of GHGs, which when taken together constitute potential influences on GCC. Because these changes may have serious environmental consequences, this memo will evaluate the potential for the proposed Project to have a significant effect upon the environment as a result of its potential contribution to the greenhouse effect. GCC refers to the change in average meteorological conditions on the earth with respect to temperature, wind patterns, precipitation and storms. Global temperatures are regulated by naturally occurring atmospheric gases such as water vapor, CO 2, N2O, CH4, hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6). These particular gases are important due to their residence time (duration they stay) in the atmosphere, which ranges from 10 years to more than 100 years. These gases allow solar radiation into the earth’s atmosphere, but prevent radiative heat from escaping, thus warming the earth’s atmosphere. GCC can occur naturally as it has in the past with the previous ice ages. Gases that trap heat in the atmosphere are often referred to as GHGs. GHGs are released into the atmosphere by both natural and anthropogenic activity. Without the natural GHG effect, the earth’s average temperature would be approximately 61 degrees Fahren heit (°F) cooler than it is currently. The cumulative accumulation of these gases in the earth’s atmosphere is considered to be the cause for the observed increase in the earth’s temperature. For the purposes of this analysis, emissions of CO2, CH4, and N2O were evaluated because these gases are the primary contributors to GCC from development projects. Although there are other substances such as fluorinated gases that also contribute to GCC, these fluorinated gases were not evaluated as their sources are not well-defined and do not contain accepted emissions factors or methodology to accurately calculate these gases. REGULATORY SETTING Executive Order S-3-05 Former California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger announced on June 1, 2005, through Executive Order S-3-05, the following reduction targets for GHG emissions: • By 2010, reduce GHG emissions to 2000 levels. • By 2020, reduce GHG emissions to 1990 levels. • By 2050, reduce GHG emissions to 80% below 1990 levels. The 2050 reduction goal represents what some scientists believe is necessary to reach levels that will stabilize the climate. The 2020 goal was established to be a mid -term target. Because this is an executive order, the goals are not legally enforceable for local governments or the private sector. 278 Tom Dodson, Tom Dodson & Associates March 12, 2024 Page 22 of 38 Appendix 1 (15742-02 AQ, GHG & EA Assessment).docx Assembly Bill (AB) 32 The California State Legislature enacted AB 32, which requires that GHGs emitted in California be reduced to 1990 levels by the year 2020. “GHGs” as defined under AB 32 include CO 2, CH4, N2O, hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6). Since AB 32 was enacted, a seventh chemical, nitrogen trifluoride, has also been added to the list of GHGs. CARB is the state agency charged with monitoring and regulating sources of GHGs. Pursuant to AB 32, CARB adopted regulations to achieve the maximum technologically feasible and cost- effective GHG emission reductions. AB 32 states the following: “Global warming poses a serious threat to the economic well-being, public health, natural resources, and the environment of California. The potential adverse impacts of global warming include the exacerbation of air quality problems, a reduction in the quality and supply of water to the state from the Sierra snowpack, a rise in sea levels resulting in the displacement of thousands of coastal businesses and residences, damage to marine ecosystems and the natural environment, and an increase in the incidences of infectious diseases, asthma, and other human health-related problems.” CARB approved the 1990 GHG emissions level of 427 million metric ton of CO 2 equivalent per year (MMTCO2e) on December 6, 2007 (21). Therefore, emissions generated in California in 2020 are required to be equal to or less than 427 MMTCO 2e. Emissions in 2020 in a “business as usual” (BAU) scenario were estimated to be 596 MMTCO 2e, which do not account for reductions from AB 32 regulations (22). At that level, a 28.4% reduction was required to achieve the 427 MMTCO2e 1990 inventory. In October 2010, CARB prepared an updated BAU 2020 forecast to account for the recession and slower forecasted growth. The forecasted inventory without the benefi ts of adopted regulation is now estimated at 545 MMTCO 2e. Therefore, under the updated forecast, a 21.7% reduction from BAU is required to achieve 1990 levels (23). Progress in Achieving AB 32 Targets and Remaining Reductions Required The State has made steady progress in implementing AB 32 and achieving targets included in Executive Order S-3-05. The progress is shown in updated emission inventories prepared by CARB for 2000 through 2012 (24). The State has achieved the Executive Order S-3-05 target for 2010 of reducing GHG emissions to 2000 levels. As shown below, the 2010 emission inventory achieved this target. • 1990: 427 MMTCO2e (AB 32 2020 target) • 2000: 463 MMTCO2e (an average 8% reduction needed to achieve 1990 base) • 2010: 450 MMTCO2e (an average 5% reduction needed to achieve 1990 base) CARB has also made substantial progress in achieving its goal of achieving 1990 emissions levels by 2020. As described earlier in this section, CARB revised the 2020 BAU inventory forecast to account for new lower growth projections, which resulted in a new lower reduction from BAU to achieve the 1990 base. The previous reduction from 2020 BAU needed to achieve 1990 levels was 28.4% and the latest reduction from 2020 BAU is 21.7%. • 2020: 545 MMTCO2e BAU (an average 21.7% reduction from BAU needed to achieve 1990 base) 279 Tom Dodson, Tom Dodson & Associates March 12, 2024 Page 23 of 38 Appendix 1 (15742-02 AQ, GHG & EA Assessment).docx Senate Bill (SB) 32 On September 8, 2016, Governor Jerry Brown signed the SB 32 and its companion bill, AB 197. SB 32 requires the state to reduce statewide GHG emissions to 40% below 1990 levels by 2030, a reduction target that was first introduced in Executive Order B -30-15. The new legislation builds upon the AB 32 goal of 1990 levels by 2020 and provides an intermediate goal to achieving S-3- 05, which sets a statewide GHG reduction target of 80% below 1990 levels by 2050. AB 197 creates a legislative committee to oversee regulators to ensure that CARB not only responds to the Governor, but also the Legislature (25). AB 197 A condition of approval for SB 32 was the passage of AB 197. AB 197 requires that CARB consider the social costs of GHG emissions and prioritize direct reductions in GHG emissions at mobile sources and large stationary sources. AB 197 also gives the California legislature more oversight over CARB through the addition of two legislatively appointed members to the CARB Board and the establishment a legislative committee to make recommendations about CARB programs to the legislature. Executive Order B-55-18 and SB 100 Executive Order B-55-18 and SB 100. SB 100 and Executive Order B-55-18 were signed by Governor Brown on September 10, 2018. Under the existing RPS, 25% of retail sales are required to be from renewable sources by December 31, 2016, 33% by December 31, 2020, 40% by December 31, 2024, 45% by December 31, 2027, and 50% by December 31, 2030. SB 100 raises California’s RPS requirement to 50% renewable resources target by December 31, 2026, and to achieve a 60% target by December 31, 2030. SB 100 also requires that retail sellers and local publicly owned electric utilities procure a minimum quantity of electricity products from eligible renewable energy resources so that the total kilowatt hours of those products sold to their retail end-use customers achieve 44% of retail sales by December 31, 2024, 52% by December 31, 2027, and 60% by December 31, 2030. In addition to targets under AB 32 and SB 32, Executive Order B - 55-18 establishes a carbon neutrality goal for the state of California by 2045; and sets a goal to maintain net negative emissions thereafter. The Executive Order directs the California Natural Resources Agency (CNRA), California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA), the Department of Food and Agriculture (CDFA), and CARB to include sequestration targets in the Natural and Working Lands Climate Change Implementation Plan consistent with the carbon neutrality goal. Title 24 California Code of Regulations (CCR) California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 24 Part 6: The California Energy Code was first adopted in 1978 in response to a legislative mandate to reduce California’s energy consumption. The standards are updated periodically to allow consideration and possible incorporation of new energy efficient technologies and methods. CCR, Title 24, Part 11: California Green Building Standards Code (CALGreen) is a comprehensive and uniform regulatory code for all residential, commercial, and school buildings that went in effect on August 1, 2009, and is administered by the California Building Standards Commission. 280 Tom Dodson, Tom Dodson & Associates March 12, 2024 Page 24 of 38 Appendix 1 (15742-02 AQ, GHG & EA Assessment).docx CALGreen is updated on a regular basis, with the most recent approved update consisting of the 2022 California Green Building Code Standards that became effective on January 1, 20233. As construction of the Project is anticipated to be completed in 2028, it is presumed that the Project would be required to comply with the Title 24 standards in place at that time. SCAQMD SCAQMD is the agency responsible for air quality planning and regulation in the SSAB. The SCAQMD addresses the impacts to climate change of projects subject to SCAQMD permit as a lead agency if they are the only agency having discretionary approval for the project and acts as a responsible agency when a land use agency must also approve discretionary permits for the project. The SCAQMD acts as an expert commenting agency for impacts to air quality. This expertise carries over to GHG emissions, so the agency helps local land use agencies through the development of models and emission thresholds that can be used to address GHG emissions. In 2008, SCAQMD formed a Working Group to identify GHG emissions thresholds for land use projects that could be used by local lead agencies in the SSAB. The Working Group developed several different options that are contained in the SCAQMD Draft Guidance Document – Interim CEQA GHG Significance Threshold, that could be applied by lead agencies. The working group has not provided additional guidance since release of the interim guidance in 2008. The SCAQMD Board has not approved the thresholds; however, the Guidance Document provides substantial evidence supporting the approaches to significance of GHG emissions that can be considered by the lead agency in adopting its own threshold. The current interim thresholds consist of the following tiered approach: • Tier 1 consists of evaluating whether or not the project qualifies for any applicable exemption under CEQA. • Tier 2 consists of determining whether the project is consistent with a GHG reduction plan. If a project is consistent with a qualifying local GHG reduction plan, it does not have significant GHG emissions. • Tier 3 consists of screening values, which the lead agency can choose, but must be consistent with all projects within its jurisdiction. A project’s construction emissions are averaged over 30 years and are added to the project’s operational emissions. If a project’s emissions are below one of the following screening thresholds, then the project is less than significant: o Residential and commercial land use: 3,000 metric ton of CO2 equivalent (MTCO2e/yr) o Industrial land use: 10,000 MTCO2e/yr o Based on land use type: residential: 3,500 MTCO2e/yr; commercial: 1,400 MTCO2e/yr; or mixed use: 3,000 MTCO2e/yr • Tier 4 has the following options: 3 The 2022 California Green Building Standard Code will be published July 1, 2022. 281 Tom Dodson, Tom Dodson & Associates March 12, 2024 Page 25 of 38 Appendix 1 (15742-02 AQ, GHG & EA Assessment).docx o Option 1: Reduce Business-as-Usual (BAU) emissions by a certain percentage; this percentage is currently undefined. o Option 2: Early implementation of applicable AB 32 Scoping Plan measures o Option 3: 2020 target for service populations (SP), which includes residents and employees: 4.8 MTCO2e per SP per year for projects and 6.6 MTCO2e per SP per year for plans; o Option 3, 2035 target: 3.0 MTCO2e per SP per year for projects and 4.1 MTCO2e per SP per year for plans • Tier 5 involves mitigation offsets to achieve target significance threshold. The SCAQMD’s interim thresholds used the Executive Order S -3-05-year 2050 goal as the basis for the Tier 3 screening level. Achieving the Executive Order’s objective would contribute to worldwide efforts to cap CO2 concentrations at 450 ppm, thus stabilizing global climate. SCAQMD only has authority over GHG emissions from development projects that include air quality permits. At this time, it is unknown if the project would include stationary sources of emissions subject to SCAQMD permits. Notwithstanding, if the Project re quires a stationary permit, it would be subject to the applicable SCAQMD regulations. SCAQMD Regulation XXVII, adopted in 2009 includes the following rules: • Rule 2700 defines terms and post global warming potentials. • Rule 2701, Southern California (SoCal) Climate Solutions Exchange, establishes a voluntary program to encourage, quantify, and certify voluntary, high quality certified GHG emission reductions in the SCAQMD. • Rule 2702, GHG Reduction Program created a program to produce GHG emission reductions within the SCAQMD. The SCAQMD will fund projects through contracts in response to requests for proposals or purchase reductions from other parties. SCAQMD is the agency responsible for air quality planning and regulation in the SSAB. The SCAQMD addresses the impacts to climate change of projects subject to SCAQMD permit as a lead agency if they are the only agency having discretionary approval for the project and acts as a responsible agency when a land use agency must also approve discretionary permits for the project. The SCAQMD acts as an expert commenting agency for impacts to air quality. This expertise carries over to GHG emissions, so the agency helps local land use agencies through the development of models and emission thresholds that can be used to address GHG emissions. GHG IMPACTS Standards of Significance According to the CEQA Guidelines Appendix G thresholds, to determine whether impacts from GHG emissions are significant. Would the project: • Threshold 1: Generate GHG emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? 282 Tom Dodson, Tom Dodson & Associates March 12, 2024 Page 26 of 38 Appendix 1 (15742-02 AQ, GHG & EA Assessment).docx • Threshold 2: Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of GHGs? The evaluation of an impact under CEQA requires measuring data from a project against both existing conditions and a “threshold of significance.” For establishing significance thresholds, the Office of Planning and Research’s amendments to the CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.7(c) state “[w]hen adopting thresholds of significance, a lead agency may consider thresholds of significance previously adopted or recommended by other public agencies, or recommended by experts, provided the decision of the lead agency to adopt such thresholds is supported by substantial evidence.” CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.4(a) further states, “. . . A lead agency shall have discretion to determine, in the context of a particular project, whether to: (1) Use a model or methodology to quantify greenhouse gas emissions resulting from a project, and which model or methodology to use . . .; or (2) Rely on a qualitative analysis or performance -based standards.” CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.4 provides that a lead agency should consider the following factors, among others, in assessing the significance of impacts from greenhouse gas emissions: • Consideration #1: The extent to which the project may increase or reduce greenhouse gas emissions as compared to the existing environmental setting. • Consideration #2: Whether the project emissions exceed a threshold of significance that the lead agency determines applies to the project. • Consideration #3: The extent to which the project complies with regulations or requirements adopted to implement a statewide, regional, or local plan for the reduction or mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions. Such regulations or requirements must be adopted by the relevant public agency through a public review process and must reduce or mitigate the project’s incremental contribution of greenhouse gas emissions. In determining the significance of impacts, the lead agency may consider a project’s consistency with the State’s long-term climate goals or strategies, provided that substantial evidence supports the agency’s analysis of how those goals or strategies address the project’s incremental contribution to climate change and its conclusion that the project’s incremental contribution is not cumulatively considerable . Discussion on Establishment of Significance Thresholds Based on the foregoing guidance, the City of Palm Desert has elected to rely on compliance with a local air district threshold in the determination of significance of Project-related GHG emissions. Specifically, the City has selected the interim 3,000 MTCO2e per year threshold recommended by SCAQMD staff for residential and commercial sector projects against which to compare Project - related GHG emissions. The 3,000 MTCO2e per year threshold is based on a 90 percent emission “capture” rate methodology. Prior to its use by the SCAQMD, the 90 percent emissions capture approach was one of the options suggested by the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA) in their CEQA & Climate Change white paper (2008). A 90 percent emission capture rate means that unmitigated GHG emissions from the top 90 percent of all GHG-producing projects within a 283 Tom Dodson, Tom Dodson & Associates March 12, 2024 Page 27 of 38 Appendix 1 (15742-02 AQ, GHG & EA Assessment).docx geographic area – the SSAB in this instance – would be subject to a detailed analysis of potential environmental impacts from GHG emissions, while the bottom 10 percent of all GHG -producing projects would be excluded from detailed analysis. A GHG significance threshold based on a 90 percent emission capture rate is appropriate to address the long-term adverse impacts associated with global climate change because medium and large projects will be required to implement measures to reduce GHG emissions, while small projects, which are generally infill development projects that are not the focus of the State’s GHG reduction targets, are allowed to proceed. Further, a 90 percent emission capture rate sets the emission threshold l ow enough to capture a substantial proportion of future development projects and demonstrate that cumulative emissions reductions are being achieved while setting the emission threshold high enough to exclude small projects that will, in aggregate, contrib ute approximate 1 percent of projected statewide GHG emissions in the Year 2050 (26). In setting the threshold at 3,000 MTCO2e per year, SCAQMD researched a database of projects kept by the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR). That database contained 798 projects, 87 of which were removed because they were very large projects and/or outliers that would skew emissions values too high, leaving 711 as the sample population to use in determining the 90th percentile capture rate. The SCAQMD analysis of the 711 projects within the sample population combined commercial, residential, and mixed-use projects. Emissions from each of these projects were calculated by SCAQMD to provide a consistent method of emissions calculations across the sample population and from projects within the sample population. In calculating the emissions, the SC AQMD analysis determined that the 90th percentile ranged between 2,983 to 3,143 MTCO2e per year. The SCAQMD set their significance threshold at the low-end value of the range when rounded to the nearest hundred tons of emissions (i.e., 3,000 MTCO2e per year) to define small projects that are considered less than significant and do not need to provide further analysis. The City understands that the 3,000 MTCO2e per year threshold for residential/commercial uses was proposed by SCAQMD a decade ago and was adopted as an interim policy; however, no permanent, superseding policy or threshold has since been adopted. The 3,000 MTCO2e per year threshold was developed and recommended by SCAQMD, an expert agency, based on substantial evidence as provided in the Draft Guidance Document – Interim CEQA Greenhouse Gas Significance Threshold (2008) document and subsequent Working Group meetings (latest of which occurred in 2010). SCAQMD has not withdrawn its support of the interim threshold and all documentation supporting the interim threshold remains on the SCAQMD website on a page that provides guidance to CEQA practitioners for air quality analysis (and where all SCAQMD significance thresholds for regional and local criteria pollutants and toxic air contaminants also are listed). Further, as stated by SCAQMD, this threshold “uses the Executive Order S -3-05 goal [80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050] as the basis for deriving the screening level” and, thus, remains valid for use in 2022 (26). Lastly, this threshold has been used for hundreds, if not thousands of GHG analyses performed for projects located within the SCAQMD jurisdiction. Thus, for purposes of analysis in this analysis, if Project-related GHG emissions do not exceed the 3,000 MTCO2e per year threshold, then Project-related GHG emissions would clearly have a less- than-significant impact pursuant to Threshold GHG-1. On the other hand, if Project-related GHG emissions exceed 3,000 MTCO2e per year, the Project would be considered a substantial source of GHG emissions. 284 Tom Dodson, Tom Dodson & Associates March 12, 2024 Page 28 of 38 Appendix 1 (15742-02 AQ, GHG & EA Assessment).docx GHG IMPACTS – CONSISTENCY WITH THRESHOLD NO. 1 Would the Project have the potential to generate direct or indirect GHG emissions that would result in a significant impact on the environment? PROJECT GHG EMISSIONS The estimated GHG emissions for the Project are summarized on Table 10. The estimated GHG emission include emissions from Carbon Dioxide (CO2), Methane (CH4), Nitrous Oxide (N2O), and Refrigerants (R). As shown on Table 10, the Project would generate a total of approximately 1,832.76 MTCO2e/yr. TABLE 10: TOTAL PROJECT GHG EMISSIONS Source Emission (lbs/day) CO2 CH4 N20 R Total CO2E Annual construction-related emissions amortized over 30 years 18.72 4.72E-04 9.47E-04 1.44E-02 19.03 Mobile Source 1409.43 0.05 0.06 1.65 1431.49 Area Source 21.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 21.61 Energy Source 311.89 0.03 0.00 0.00 313.17 Water 16.64 0.12 0.00 0.00 20.68 Waste 7.59 0.76 0.00 0.00 26.55 Refrigerants 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 Total CO2e (All Sources) 1,832.76 A numerical threshold for determining the significance of GHG emissions in the SSAB has not been established by the SCAQMD for projects where it is not the lead agency . As an interim threshold based on guidance provided in the CAPCOA CEQA and Climate Change handbook, the City has opted to use a non-zero threshold approach based on Approach 2 of the handbook. Threshold 2.5 (Unit-Based Thresholds Based on Market Capture) establishes a numerical threshold based on capture of approximately 90% of emissions from future development. The latest threshold developed by SCAQMD using this method is 3,000 MTCO2e/yr for all projects (27). The Project would result in approximately 1,832.76 MTCO2e/yr; the proposed Project would not exceed the SCAQMD’s numeric threshold of 3,000 MTCO2e/yr. Thus, the Project would result in a less than significant impact with respect to GHG emissions. GHG IMPACTS – CONSISTENCY WITH THRESHOLD NO. 2 Would the Project have the potential to conflict with any applicable plan, policy or regulation of an agency adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of GHGs? Pursuant to 15604.4 of the CEQA Guidelines, a lead agency may rely on qualitative analysis or performance-based standards to determine the significance of impacts from GHG emissions (28). 285 Tom Dodson, Tom Dodson & Associates March 12, 2024 Page 29 of 38 Appendix 1 (15742-02 AQ, GHG & EA Assessment).docx In November 2022, CARB released the Final 2022 Scoping Plan Update, which identifies the State’s progress towards the statutory 2030 target, while providing a path towards carbon neutrality and reduce greenhouse gases emissions by 85% below 1990 levels by 2045. Recent studies show that the State’s existing and proposed regulatory framework will allow the State to reduce its GHG emissions level to 40% below 1990 levels by 2030 (29). The Project would not conflict with any of the 2022 Scoping Plan elements as any regulations adopted would apply directly or indirectly to the Project. Finally, the Project is consistent with the general plan land use designation, density, building intensity, and applicable policies specified for the Project area in SCAG's Sustainable Community Strategy/Regional Transportation Plan, which pursuant to SB 375 calls for the integration of transportation, land-use and housing policies to plan for achievement of the GHG-emissions target for the region. Thus, a less than significant impact related to GHG emissions from Project construction and operation would occur and no mitigation is required. APPROVED PROJECT GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS The site was previously evaluated for 324 timeshare units, which Marriott no longer intends to develop due to the existing inventory levels and reduced demand. The estimated GHG emissions from the Approved Project are summarized on Table 11. Detailed operation model outputs for the Approved Project are presented in Attachment B. TABLE 11: APPROVED PROJECT GHG EMISSIONS Source Emission (lbs/day) CO2 CH4 N2O R Total CO2e Mobile Source 4,626.45 0.18 0.22 7.75 4,703.86 Area Source 81.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 81.47 Energy Source 733.98 0.07 0.00 0.00 737.14 Water 14.05 0.43 0.01 0.00 27.86 Waste 21.39 2.14 0.00 0.00 74.83 Refrigerants 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.41 0.41 Total CO2e (All Sources) 5,625.57 NET GHG EMISSIONS – COMPARISON TO APPROVED PROJECT The estimated net GHG emissions for the Project land uses are summarized in Table 12. As shown in Table 12, the Project would result in approximately a net decrease of 3,792.81 MTCO2e/yr; the Proposed Project would not exceed the SCAQMD’s numeric threshold of 3,000 MTCO2e/yr. Thus, the Project would result in a less than significant impact with respect to GHG emissions. 286 Tom Dodson, Tom Dodson & Associates March 12, 2024 Page 30 of 38 Appendix 1 (15742-02 AQ, GHG & EA Assessment).docx TABLE 12: PROJECT NET GHG EMISSIONS Emission Source Total CO2e Proposed Project 1,832.76 Approved Project 5,625.57 Net Emissions (Proposed – Approved) -3,792.81 PROJECT ENERGY ANALYSIS Standards of Significance Appendix F of the State CEQA Guidelines (30), states that the means of achieving the goal of energy conservation includes the following: • Decreasing overall per capita energy consumption; • Decreasing reliance on fossil fuels such as coal, natural gas, and oil; and • Increasing reliance on renewable energy sources. According to Appendix F, the analysis should include a description of energy conservation measures included as part of the project and should consider whether a project would result in inefficient, wasteful and unnecessary consumption of energy. In compliance with Appendix F and Appendix G of the State CEQA Guidelines (31), this report analyzes the project’s anticipated energy use during construction and operations to determine if the Project would: • Result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation; or • Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency Emission Factors Model Vehicle fuel efficiencies for light-duty-auto vehicles (LDA), light-duty-trucks (LDT1), and light-duty- trucks (LDT2) were estimated using information generated within the 2021 version of the EMFAC developed by the California Air Resources Board (CARB). EMFAC2021 is a mathematical model that was developed to calculate emission rates, fuel consumption, and VMT from motor vehicles that operate on highways, freeways, and local roads in California and is commonly used by CARB to project changes in future emissions from on-road mobile sources (32). EMFAC2021 was run for the LDA, LDT1, and LDT2 vehicle class within the California Riverside (SS) sub-area for the 2024 through 2028 calendar years. Data from EMFAC2021 is shown in Attachment C. CONSTRUCTION ENERGY DEMANDS CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT ELECTRICITY USAGE ESTIMATES The 2024 National Construction Estimator identifies a typical power cost per 1,000 sf of construction per month of $2.66, which was used to calculate the Project’s total construction power cost (33). 287 Tom Dodson, Tom Dodson & Associates March 12, 2024 Page 31 of 38 Appendix 1 (15742-02 AQ, GHG & EA Assessment).docx Based on Table 13, the total power cost of the on-site electricity usage during the construction of the Project is estimated to be approximately $159,698.03. As shown on Table 14, the total electricity usage from on-site Project construction related activities is estimated to be approximately 1,190,352 kWh. TABLE 13: PROJECT CONSTRUCTION POWER COST Land Use Power Cost (per 1,000 SF of building per month of construction) Total Building Size (1,000 SF) Construction Duration (months) Project Construction Power Cost Single Family Residential $2.66 215.853 46 $26,411.77 Landscape $2.66 1,089.296 46 $133,286.26 TOTAL PROJECT CONSTRUCTION POWER COST $159,698.03 TABLE 14: PROJECT CONSTRUCTION ELECTRICITY USAGE Land Use Cost per kWh1 Project Construction Electricity Usage (kWh) Single Family Residential $0.16 165,074 Landscape $0.13 1,025,279 TOTAL PROJECT CONSTURCTION ELECTRICTY USAGE (kWh) 1,190,352 1Assumes the Project will be under the Standard Residential and GS-1 General Service Rate under Southern California Edison CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT FUEL ESTIMATES As presented in Table 15, Project construction activities would consume an estimated 22,646 gallons of diesel fuel. Project construction would represent a “single ‐event” diesel fuel demand and would not require on‐going or permanent commitment of diesel fuel resources for this purpose. CONSTRUCTION WORKER FUEL ESTIMATES With respect to estimated VMT, the construction worker trips would generate an estimated 651,385 VMT. Based on CalEEMod methodology, it is assumed that 50% of all vendor trips are from LDA, 25% are from LDT1, and 25% are from LDT2. Data regarding Project related construction worker trips were based on CalEEMod defaults for the land use type and project location which are also utilized within the air quality assessment and CalEEMod outputs contained herein. As shown on Table 16, it is estimated that 23,430 gallons of fuel will be consumed related to construction worker trips during full construction of the proposed Project. Project construction worker trips would represent a “single‐event” gasoline fuel demand and would not require on‐ going or permanent commitment of fuel resources for this purpose. 288 Tom Dodson, Tom Dodson & Associates March 12, 2024 Page 32 of 38 Appendix 1 (15742-02 AQ, GHG & EA Assessment).docx TABLE 15: PROJECT CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT FUEL CONSUMPTIONS ESTIMATES Activity/Duration Duration (Days) Equipment HP Rating Quantity Usage Hours Load Factor HP-hrs/day Total Fuel Consumption (gal. diesel fuel) Site Preparation 6 Rubber Tired Dozers 367 1 8 0.4 1,174 381 Grading 28 Graders 148 1 8 0.41 485 735 Scrapers 423 2 8 0.48 3,249 4,917 Rubber Tired Dozers 367 1 8 0.4 1,174 1,777 Building Construction 849 Forklifts 82 1 8 0.2 131 6,021 Generator Sets 14 2 8 0.74 166 7,607 Paving 25 Pavers 81 1 8 0.42 272 368 Paving Equipment 89 2 8 0.36 513 693 Rollers 36 1 8 0.38 109 148 CONSTRUCTION FUEL DEMAND (GALLONS DIESEL FUEL) 22,646 289 Tom Dodson, Tom Dodson & Associates March 12, 2024 Page 33 of 38 Appendix 1 (15742-02 AQ, GHG & EA Assessment).docx TABLE 16: CONSTRUCTION WORKER FUEL CONSUMPTION ESTIMATES Year Construction Activity Duration (Days) Worker Trips/Day Trip Length (miles) VMT Average Vehicle Fuel Economy (mpg) Estimated Fuel Consumption (gallons) 2024 LDA Site Preparation 6 2 18.5 222 31.15 7 Grading 28 5 18.5 2,590 31.15 83 LDT1 Site Preparation 6 1 18.5 111 23.65 5 Grading 28 3 18.5 1,554 23.65 66 LDT2 Site Preparation 6 1 18.5 111 23.77 5 Grading 28 3 18.5 1,554 23.77 65 2025 LDA Building Construction 849 17 18.5 267,011 32.28 8,273 Paving 25 5 18.5 2,313 32.28 72 LDT1 Building Construction 849 9 18.5 141,359 24.14 5,855 Paving 25 3 18.5 1,388 24.14 57 LDT2 Building Construction 849 9 18.5 141,359 24.44 5,784 Paving 25 3 18.5 1,388 24.44 57 2026 LDA Architectural Coating 175 4 18.5 12,950 33.27 389 LDT1 Architectural Coating 175 2 18.5 6,475 24.65 263 LDT2 Architectural Coating 175 2 18.5 6,475 25.09 258 2027 LDA Architectural Coating 261 4 18.5 19,314 34.21 565 LDT1 Architectural Coating 261 2 18.5 9,657 25.16 384 LDT2 Architectural Coating 261 2 18.5 9,657 25.69 376 290 Tom Dodson, Tom Dodson & Associates March 12, 2024 Page 34 of 38 Appendix 1 (15742-02 AQ, GHG & EA Assessment).docx 2028 LDA Architectural Coating 175 4 18.5 12,950 35.09 369 LDT1 Architectural Coating 175 2 18.5 6,475 25.68 252 LDT2 Architectural Coating 175 2 18.5 6,475 26.25 247 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION WORKER FUEL CONSUMPTION 23,430 CONSTRUCTION VENDOR/HAULING FUEL ESTIMATES With respect to estimated VMT, the construction vendor trips would generate an estimated 101,718 VMT. It is assumed that 50% of all vendor trips are from medium-heavy duty trucks (MHDT) and 50% of vendor trips are from heavy-heavy duty trucks (HHDT). As shown on Table 17, it is estimated that 14,938 gallons of fuel will be consumed related to construction vendor trips (medium duty trucks) during full construction of the Project. Project construction vendor trips would represent a “single‐event” diesel fuel demand and would not require on‐going or permanent commitment of diesel fuel resources for this purpose. TABLE 17: CONSTRUCTION VENDOR FUEL CONSUMPTION ESTIMATES Year Construction Activity Duration (Days) Worker Trips/Day Trip Length (miles) VMT Average Vehicle Fuel Economy (mpg) Estimated Fuel Consumptio n (gallons) 2024 HHDT (Hauling) Grading 28 27 20 15,120 6.19 2,441 2025 MHDT Building Construction 849 5 10.2 43,299 7.67 5,642 HHDT (Vendor) Building Construction 849 5 10.2 43,299 6.32 6,855 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION WORKER FUEL CONSUMPTION 14,938 CONSTRUCTION ENERGY DEMANDS SUMMARY Construction equipment use of fuel would not be atypical for the type of construction proposed because there are no aspects of the Project’s proposed construction process that are unusual or energy-intensive, and Project construction equipment would conform to the applicable CARB emissions standards, acting to promote equipment fuel efficiencies. CCR Title 13, Title 13, Motor Vehicles, section 2449(d)(3) Idling, limits idling times of construction vehicles to no more than 5 minutes, thereby precluding unnecessary and wasteful consumption of fuel due to unproductive idling of construction equipment. Best Available Control Measures (BACMs) inform construction equipment operators of this requirement. 291 Tom Dodson, Tom Dodson & Associates March 12, 2024 Page 35 of 38 Appendix 1 (15742-02 AQ, GHG & EA Assessment).docx With regard to construction worker trips, the 2022 IEPR released by the CEC has shown that fuel efficiencies are getting better within on and off-road vehicle engines due to more stringent government requirements. As supported by the preceding discussions, Project construction energy consumption would not be considered inefficient, wasteful, or otherwise unnecessary. OPERATIONAL ENERGY DEMANDS Proposed Project Transportation Energy Demands Energy that would be consumed by Project‐generated traffic is a function of total VMT and estimated vehicle fuel economies of vehicles accessing the Project site. The VMT per vehicle class can be determined by the vehicle fleet mix and the total VMT. As with worker and vendors trips, operational vehicle fuel efficiencies were estimated using information generated within EMFAC2021 developed by CARB (32). As summarized on Table 18 the Project will result in a 3,960,351 annual VMT and an estimated annual fuel consumption of 158,532 gallons of fuel. TABLE 18: PROJECT-GENERATED VEHICLE TRAFFIC ANNUAL FUEL CONSUMPTION Vehicle Type Average Vehicle Fuel Economy (mpg) Annual VMT Estimated Annual Fuel Consumption (gallons) LDA 35.09 1,803,944 51,402 LDT1 25.68 155,250 6,045 LDT2 26.25 970,606 36,970 MDV 21.67 645,074 29,768 LHDT1 18.02 107,205 5,948 LHDT2 16.29 31,797 1,952 MHDT 8.10 43,194 5,330 HHDT 6.79 104,313 15,360 OBUS 6.17 2,216 359 UBUS 5.55 1,770 319 MCY 43.36 73,859 1,703 SBUS 6.77 5,101 753 MH 6.11 16,020 2,622 TOTAL (ALL VEHICLES) 3,960,351 158,532 Proposed Project Energy Demands As shown on Table 19, the Project operational energy demands are estimated to result in a 3,307,481 kBTU/year of natural gas; and 868,550 kWh/year of electricity. Natural gas would be supplied to the Project by Southern California Gas; electricity would be supplied by Southern California Edison. 292 Tom Dodson, Tom Dodson & Associates March 12, 2024 Page 36 of 38 Appendix 1 (15742-02 AQ, GHG & EA Assessment).docx TABLE 19: PROJECT ANNUAL OPERATIONAL ENERGY DEMAND SUMMARY Land Use Natural Gas Demand (kBTU/year) Electricity Demand (kWh/year) Single Family Residential 3,307,481 868,550 TOTAL PROJECT ENERGY DEMAND 3,307,481 868,550 OPERATIONAL ENERGY DEMANDS SUMMARY The Project proposes conventional residential uses reflecting contemporary energy efficient/energy conserving designs and operational programs. The Project does not propose uses that are inherently energy intensive and the energy demands in total would be comparable to other residential land use projects of similar scale and configuration. The Project will comply with the applicable Title 24 standards which will ensure that the Project energy demands would not be inefficient, wasteful, or otherwise unnecessary. The Project would not cause or result in the need for additional energy producing or transmission facilities. The Project would not engage in wasteful or inefficient uses of energy and aims to achieve energy conservations goals within the State of California. As supported by the preceding analyses, Project operations would not result in the inefficient, wasteful, or unnecessary consumption of energy. ENERGY IMPACT 1 Would the Project result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation? Impact Analysis A significant impact would occur if the proposed Project would result in the inefficient, wasteful, or unnecessary use of energy. Construction Based on CalEEMod estimations within the modeling output files used to estimate GHG emissions associated with future development projects under the General Plan, construction-related vehicle trips would result in approximately 651,385 VMT and consume an estimated 23,430 gallons of gasoline and diesel combined during future development projects construction phases. Additionally, on-site construction equipment would consume an estimated 22,646 gallons of diesel fuel. Limitations on idling of vehicles and equipment and requirements that equipment be properly maintained would result in fuel savings. California Code of Regulations, Title 13, Sections 2449 and 2485, limit idling from both on-road and off-road diesel-powered equipment and are enforced by the ARB. Additionally, given the cost of fuel, contractors and owners have a strong financial incentive to avoid wasteful, inefficient, and unnecessary consumption of energy during construction. Due to the temporary nature of construction and the financial incentives for developers and contractors to use energy-consuming resources in an efficient manner, the construction phase of the proposed project would not result in wasteful, inefficient, and unnecessary consumption 293 Tom Dodson, Tom Dodson & Associates March 12, 2024 Page 37 of 38 Appendix 1 (15742-02 AQ, GHG & EA Assessment).docx of energy. Therefore, the construction-related impacts related to electricity and fuel consumption would be less than significant. Operation Electricity and Natural Gas Operation of the proposed project would consume energy as part of building operations and transportation activities. Building operations would involve energy consumption for multiple purposes including, but not limited to, building heating and cooling, ref rigeration, lighting, and electronics. Based on CalEEMod energy use estimations, operations for the Project would result in approximately 868,550 kWh of electricity and 3,307,481 kBTU/year of natural gas annually. Future development projects would be designed and constructed in accordance with the City’s latest adopted energy efficiency standards, which are based on the California Title 24 energy efficiency standards. Title 24 standards include a broad set of energy conservation requirements that apply to the structural, mechanical, electrical, and plumbing systems in a building. For example, the Title 24 Lighting Power Density requirements define the maximum wattage of lighting that can be used in a building based on its square footage. Title 24 standards are widely regarded as the most advanced energy efficiency standards, would help reduce the amount of energy required for lighting, water heating, and heating and air conditioning in buildings and promote energy conservation. Fuel Operational energy would also be consumed during vehicle trips associated with future development projects envisioned under the proposed project. Fuel consumption would be primarily related to vehicle use by residents, visitors, and employees associated wi th future development projects. Based on CalEEMod energy use estimations, project -related vehicle trips would result in approximately 3,960,351 VMT and consume an estimated 158,532 gallons of gasoline and diesel combined, annually (see Attachment C). The existing transportation facilities and infrastructure would provide future visitors and employees associated with the Project access to a mix of land uses in close proximity to the Project, thus further reducing fuel consumption demand. As such, operational-related transportation fuel consumption would not result in a significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources. Therefore, the operational impact related to vehicle fuel consumption would be less than significant. ENERGY IMPACT 2 Would the Project conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency? Impact Analysis A significant impact would occur if the proposed Project would conflict with or obstruct a State or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency. 294 Tom Dodson, Tom Dodson & Associates March 12, 2024 Page 38 of 38 Appendix 1 (15742-02 AQ, GHG & EA Assessment).docx Construction As discussed previously, the proposed project would result in energy consumption through the combustion of fossil fuels in construction vehicles, worker commute vehicles, and construction equipment, and the use of electricity for temporary buildings, lighting, and other sources. California Code of Regulations Title 13, Sections 2449 and 2485, limit idling from both on - road and off-road diesel-powered equipment and are enforced by the ARB. The proposed project would comply with these regulations. There are no policies at the local level applicable to energy conservation specific to the construction phase. Thus, it is anticipated that construction of the proposed project would not conflict with any applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing energy use or increasing the use of renewable energy. Therefore, construction-related energy efficiency and renewable energy standards consistency impacts would be less than significant. Operation California’s Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) establishes a goal of renewable energy for local providers to be 44 percent by 2040. Similarly, the State is promoting renewable energy targets to meet the 2022 Scoping Plan greenhouse gas emissions reduction s. As discussed in Section 5.1, above, the Project would result in approximately 868,550 kWh of electricity and 3,307,481 kBTU/year of natural gas annually. Future development projects would be designed and constructed in accordance with the City’s latest adopted energy efficiency standards, which are based on the California Title 24 energy efficiency standards. Title 24 standards include a broad set of energy conservation requirements that apply to the structural, mechanical, electrical, and plumbing systems in a building. For example, the Title 24 Lighting Power Density requirements define the maximum wattage of lighting that can be used in a building based on its square footage. Title 24 standards are widely regarded as the most advanced energy efficiency standards, would help reduce the amount of energy required for lighting, water heating, and heating and air conditioning in buildings and promote energy conservation. Compliance with the aforementioned mandatory measures would ensure that future development projects would not conflict with any applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing energy use or increasing the use of renewable energy. Therefore, operational energy efficiency and renewable energy standards consistency impacts would be less than significant. APPROVED PROJECT OPERATIONAL ENERGY DEMANDS The site was previously evaluated for 324 timeshare units, which Marriott no longer intends to develop due to the existing inventory levels and reduced demand . Net Transportation Energy Demands – Comparison to Approved Project The estimated transportation energy demands from the Approved Project are summarized on Table 20 and are based on CalEEMod defaults. 295 Tom Dodson, Tom Dodson & Associates March 12, 2024 Page 39 of 38 Appendix 1 (15742-02 AQ, GHG & EA Assessment).docx TABLE 20: NET-GENERATED VEHICLE TRAFFIC ANNUAL FUEL CONSUMPTION Vehicle Type Annual VMT Estimated Annual Fuel Consumption (gallons) Proposed Project 3,960,351 158,532 Approved Project 11,963,633 527,686 Net All Vehicles (Proposed – Approved) -8,003,282 -369,154 Net Energy Demands – Comparison to Approved Project The estimated energy demands from the Approved Project are summarized on Table 21 and are based on CalEEMod defaults. TABLE 21: NET ANNUAL OPERATIONAL ENERGY DEMAND SUMMARY Vehicle Type Natural Gas Demand (kBTU/year) Electricity Demand (kWh/year) Proposed Project 3,307,481 868,550 Approved Project 6,755,619 2,374,642 Net Energy Demand (Proposed – Approved) -3,448,138 -1,506,092 AIR QUALITY, GREENHOUSE GAS, & ENERGY CONCLUSION Results of the assessment indicate that the Project is not anticipated to result in a significant impact during construction or operational activities associated with air quality, greenhouse gas and energy and no mitigation is required. 296 Appendix 1 (15742-02 AQ, GHG & EA Assessment).docx REFERENCES 1. Air Resources Board. California Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS). [Online] 2009. [Cited: April 16, 2018.] http://www.arb.ca.gov/research/aaqs/caaqs/caaqs.htm. 2. Environmental Protection Agency. National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). [Online] 1990. https://www.epa.gov/environmental-topics/air-topics. 3. Southern California Association of Governments. 2016-2040 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy. [Online] April 2016. http://scagrtpscs.net/Documents/2016/final/f2016RTPSCS.pdf. 4. South Coast Air Quality Management District. RULE 403. FUGITIVE DUST. [Online] https://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/rule-book/rule-iv/rule-403.pdf?sfvrsn=4. 5. —. RULE 445. Wood-Burning Devices. [Online] http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/rule- book/rule-iv/rule-445.pdf. 6. —. RULE 1113. Architectural Coatings. [Online] http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default - source/rule-book/reg-xi/r1113.pdf. 7. California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA). California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod). [Online] May 2022. www.caleemod.com. 8. State of California. 2020 CEQA California Environmental Quality Act. 2020. 9. South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). SCAQMD Air Quality Significance Thresholds. [Online] https://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default- source/ceqa/handbook/south-coast-aqmd-air-quality-significance-thresholds.pdf. 10. California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA). Appendix A: Calculation Details for CalEEMod. CalEEMod. [Online] http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default- source/caleemod/02_appendix-a2016-3-2.pdf?sfvrsn=6. 11. Urban Crossroads, Inc. Shadow Ridge Trip Generation Assessment . 2023. 12. South Coast Air Quality Management District. Localized Significance Thresholds Methodology. s.l. : South Coast Air Quality Managment District, 2003. 13. —. Final 2016 Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP). [Online] March 2017. http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/clean-air-plans/air-quality-management- plans/2016-air-quality-management-plan/final-2016- aqmp/final2016aqmp.pdf?sfvrsn=11. 14. Southern California Association of Governments. 2020-2045 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy. [Online] September 2020. https://scag.ca.gov/sites/main/files/file-attachments/0903fconnectsocal- plan_0.pdf?1606001176. 15. City of Palm Desert. City of Palm Desert General Plan. [Online] 2016. chrome- extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.palmdesert.gov/home/sh owpublisheddocument/17192/636302002115270000. 297 Appendix 1 (15742-02 AQ, GHG & EA Assessment).docx 16. —. Palm Desert, California Municipal Code. [Online] 2023. https://library.qcode.us/lib/palm_desert_ca/pub/municipal_code/item/title_25- chapter_25_10-25_10_020. 17. Goss, Tracy A and Kroeger, Amy. White Paper on Potential Control Strategies to Address Cumulative Impacts from Air Pollution. [Online] South Coast Air Quality Management District, 2003. http://www.aqmd.gov/rules/ciwg/final_white_paper.pdf. 18. South Coast Air Quality Management District. 2003 Air Quality Management Plan. [Online] 2003. https://www.aqmd.gov/home/air-quality/clean-air-plans/air-quality-mgt- plan/2003-aqmp. 19. Bay Area Air Quality Management District. [Online] http://www.baaqmd.gov/. 20. South Coast Air Quality Management District. RULE 402 NUISANCE. [Online] http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/rule-book/rule-iv/rule-402.pdf. 21. California Air Resources Board. GHG 1990 Emissions Level & 2020 Limit. California Air Resources Board. [Online] https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/ghg-2020-limit. 22. —. Climate Change Draft Scoping Plan. 2008. 23. —. STATUS OF SCOPING PLAN RECOMMENDED MEASURES. [Online] [Cited: September 19, 2019.] https://ww3.arb.ca.gov/cc/scopingplan/status_of_scoping_plan_measures.pdf. 24. —. First Update to the Climate Change Scoping Plan. 2014. 25. California Legislative Information. Senate Bill No. 32. [Online] September 8, 2016. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201520160SB32. 26. South Coast Air Quality Management District. Interim CEQA GHG Significnace Threshold for Stationary Sources, Rules and Plans. Diamond Bar : s.n., 2008. 27. —. Interim CEQA GHG Threshold for Stationary Sources, Rules and Plans. [Online] December 5, 2008. http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/greenhouse- gases-(ghg)-ceqa-significance-thresholds/ghgboardsynopsis.pdf. 28. Association of Environmental Professionals. 2018 CEQA California Environmental Quality Act. 2018. 29. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. California's Policies Can Significantly Cut Greenhouse Gas Emissions through 2030. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. [Online] January 22, 2015. http://newscenter.lbl.gov/2015/01/22/californias -policies- can-significantly-cut-greenhouse-gas-emissions-2030/. 30. State of California. California Environmental Quality Act Guideline, California Public Resources Code, Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3,. 31. Association of Environmental Professionals. 2019 CEQA California Environmental Quality Act. 2019. 32. California Department of Transportation. EMFAC Software. [Online] http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/env/air/pages/emfac.htm. 298 Appendix 1 (15742-02 AQ, GHG & EA Assessment).docx 33. Pray, Richard. 2024 National Construction Estimator. Carlsbad : Craftsman Book Company, 2024. 299 Appendix 1 (15742-02 AQ, GHG & EA Assessment).docx ATTACHMENT A CALEEMOD PROPOSED PROJECT EMISSIONS MODEL OUTPUTS 300 Appendix 1 (15742-02 AQ, GHG & EA Assessment).docx ATTACHMENT B CALEEMOD APPROVED PROJECT EMISSIONS MODEL OUTPUTS 301 Appendix 1 (15742-02 AQ, GHG & EA Assessment).docx ATTACHMENT C EMFAC2021 302 City of Palm Desert Shadow Ridge Project, PP 23-0023/VTTM 38866 SECTION 15183 ANALYSIS TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES APPENDIX 2 303 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT, JURISDICTIONAL DELINEATION, AND CVMSHCP CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS FOR THE SHADOW RIDGE DEVELOPMENT, CITY OF PALM DESERT, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: Tom Dodson & Associates 2150 North Arrowhead Avenue San Bernardino, California 92405 Prepared by: Jennings Environmental, LLC 35414 Acacia Ave. Yucaipa, CA 92399 909-534-4547 December 2023 304 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT, JURISDICTIONAL DELINEATION, AND CVMSHCP CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS FOR THE SHADOW RIDGE DEVELOPMENT, CITY OF PALM DESERT, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Contents SECTION 1.0 - INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 PROJECT LOCATION ............................................................................................................................................. 3 1.2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ........................................................................................................................................ 3 2.0 – METHODOLOGY .................................................................................................................................................... 3 2.1 LITERATURE REVIEW ........................................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 SOILS .................................................................................................................................................................... 4 2.3 BIOLOGICAL RECONNAISSANCE-LEVEL SURVEY .................................................................................................. 4 2.4 JURISDICTIONAL FEATURES ................................................................................................................................. 4 2.5 COACHELLA VALLEY MULTIPLE SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (CVMSHCP) ....................................... 5 2.6 VEGETATION ........................................................................................................................................................ 6 2.7 WILDLIFE .............................................................................................................................................................. 6 SECTION 3.0 – RESULTS ................................................................................................................................................. 6 3.1 LITERATURE REVIEW RESULTS ............................................................................................................................. 6 3.1.1 SOILS ............................................................................................................................................................ 6 3.1.2 JURISDICTIONAL WATERS ............................................................................................................................ 7 3.1.3 HYDROLOGY AND HYDROLOGIC CONNECTIVITY ......................................................................................... 7 3.1.4 SPECIAL STATUS SPECIES BACKGROUND ..................................................................................................... 8 3.1.5 CVMSHCP ..................................................................................................................................................... 9 3.2 FIELD STUDY RESULTS ......................................................................................................................................... 9 3.2.1 HABITAT ....................................................................................................................................................... 9 3.2.2 WILDLIFE .................................................................................................................................................... 10 3.2.3 SPECIAL STATUS SPECIES ............................................................................................................................ 10 3.2.4 NESTING BIRDS........................................................................................................................................... 10 3.2.5 JURISDICTIONAL WATERS .......................................................................................................................... 11 3.2.6 WETLANDS ................................................................................................................................................. 11 3.3 CVMSHCP CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS ................................................................................................................... 11 SECTION 4.0 - CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................................................... 11 Section 5 – REFERENCES .............................................................................................................................................. 14 Appendix A - Figures .................................................................................................................................................... 15 Appendix B - Photos .................................................................................................................................................... 20 Appendix C – Regulatory Framework .......................................................................................................................... 25 Appendix D – Tables .................................................................................................................................................... 32 305 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT, JURISDICTIONAL DELINEATION, AND CVMSHCP CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS FOR THE SHADOW RIDGE DEVELOPMENT, CITY OF PALM DESERT, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Jennings Environmental Page | 3 SECTION 1.0 - INTRODUCTION Jennings Environmental, LLC (Jennings) was retained by Tom Dodson and Associates (TDA) to conduct a literature review and reconnaissance-level survey for the proposed Shadow Ridge Development (Project) in the city of Palm Desert. The survey identified vegetation communities, the potential for the occurrence of special status species, or habitats that could support special status wildlife species, and recorded all plants and animals observed or detected within the Project boundary. This biological resources assessment is designed to address the potential effects of the proposed project on designated critical habitats and/or any species currently listed or formally proposed for listing as endangered or threatened under the federal Endangered Species Act (ESA) and the California Endangered Species Act (CESA) or species designated as sensitive by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) or the California Native Plant Society (CNPS). Information contained in this document is in accordance with accepted scientific and technical standards that are consistent with the requirements of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and CDFW. Additionally, the site was surveyed for any drainage features that would meet the definition of the Waters of the US (WOUS), Waters of the State (WOS), or CDFW jurisdiction. Additionally, the project is located within the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (CVMSHCP). As such, this report also contains the results of the consistency analysis performed for the Project site. 1.1 PROJECT LOCATION The Project is approximately 20.6 acres and is generally located within Section 32, Township 4 South, Range 6 East, and is depicted on the Cathedral City U.S. Geological Survey’s (USGS) 7.5-minute topographic map. More specifically the Project is located on the southeast corner of the intersection of Gerald Ford Drive and Monterey Ave. (APNs 694-290-010 & 011 and 694-320-010 & 011), within the city of Palm Desert, Riverside County, California. The Project site is part of a phased development for the Marriott’s Shadow Ridge facility. The site is surrounded by the Shadow Ridge Golf Course. (Figures 1 and 2 in Appendix A). 1.2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Project is to subdivide the parcels into 93 lots and construct single-family homes. Access to the site will be provided by the existing paved road, Shadow Ridge Road. Additional improvements include the construction of a pedestrian walkway and drainage system along Shadow Ridge Road proceeding west to the existing pedestrian walkway at the Club House. 2.0 – METHODOLOGY 2.1 LITERATURE REVIEW Prior to performing the field survey, existing documentation relevant to the Project site was reviewed. The most recent records of the California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) managed by CDFW (CDFW 2023), the USFWS Critical Habitat Mapper (USFWS 2023), and the California Native Plant Society’s Electronic Inventory (CNPSEI) of Rare and Endangered Vascular Plants of California (CNPS 2023) were reviewed for the following quadrangles containing and surrounding the Project site: Cathedral City and 306 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT, JURISDICTIONAL DELINEATION, AND CVMSHCP CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS FOR THE SHADOW RIDGE DEVELOPMENT, CITY OF PALM DESERT, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Jennings Environmental Page | 4 Myoma, USGS 7.5-minute quadrangles. The Myoma quad was included in this search due to the site’s proximity to its border. These databases contain records of reported occurrences of federal- or state- listed endangered or threatened species, California Species of Concern (SSC), or otherwise special status species or habitats that may occur within or in the immediate vicinity of the Project site. These sources include: • California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) managed by CDFW (CDFW 2023) • USFWS Critical Habitat Mapper (USFWS 2023) • California Native Plant Society’s Electronic Inventory (CNPSEI) of Rare and Endangered Vascular Plants of California (CNPS 2023) • U.S. Fish and Wildlife (USFWS) threatened and endangered species occurrence GIS overlay; • USGS National Map; • Calwater Watershed Maps • USFWS Designated Critical Habitat Maps • Coachella Valley MSHCP Overlays (2023) 2.2 SOILS Before conducting the surveys, soil maps for Riverside County were referenced online to determine the types of soil found within the Project site. Soils were determined in accordance with categories set forth by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Soil Conservation Service and by referencing the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Web Soil Survey (USDA 2023). 2.3 BIOLOGICAL RECONNAISSANCE-LEVEL SURVEY Jennings biologist, Gene Jennings, conducted the general reconnaissance survey within the Project site to identify the potential for the occurrence of special status species, vegetation communities, or habitats that could support special status wildlife species. The surveys were conducted on foot, throughout the Project site between 0730 and 0930 hours on October 27, 2023. Weather conditions during the survey included temperatures ranging from 60.1 to 65.2 degrees Fahrenheit, with no cloud cover, no precipitation, and 2.3 to 4.6 mile-per-hour winds. Photographs of the Project site were taken to document existing conditions (Appendix B). 2.4 JURISDICTIONAL FEATURES A general assessment of jurisdictional waters regulated by the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), and CDFW was conducted for the proposed Project area. Pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, USACE regulates the discharge of dredged and/or fill material into waters of the United States. The State of California (State) regulates the discharge of material into waters of the State pursuant to Section 401 of the Clean Water Act and the California Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act (California Water Code, Division 7, §13000 et seq.). Pursuant to Division 2, Chapter 6, Sections 1600-1602 of the California Fish and Game Code, CDFW regulates all substantial diversions, obstructions, or changes to the natural flow or bed, channel, or bank of any river, stream, or lake, which supports fish or wildlife. The initial assessment was conducted by a desktop survey through the USGS National Hydrography Dataset for hydrological connectivity. Additional assessment 307 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT, JURISDICTIONAL DELINEATION, AND CVMSHCP CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS FOR THE SHADOW RIDGE DEVELOPMENT, CITY OF PALM DESERT, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Jennings Environmental Page | 5 findings are discussed in Sections 3.1.2 and 3.2.5. A discussion of the regulatory framework is provided in Appendix C. 2.5 COACHELLA VALLEY MULTIPLE SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (CVMSHCP) The CVMSHCP is a regional multi-agency conservation plan that provides for the long-term conservation of approximately 240,000 acres of open space and 27 plant and animal species in the Coachella Valley. The stated overall goal of the CVMSHCP is, “… to enhance and maintain biological diversity and ecosystem processes while allowing future economic growth.” The CVMSHCP balances environmental protection and economic development objectives in the plan area and simplifies compliance with endangered species laws. The Plan is subdivided according to specific resource conservation goals that have been organized according to geographic areas defined as Conservation Areas that serve as natural habitat for covered species. These areas are identified as Core, Essential, or Other Conserved Habitat for special-status plant, invertebrate, amphibian, reptile, bird, and mammal species, Essential Ecological Process Areas, and Biological Corridors and Linkages. For each Conservation Area, Conservation Objectives and required measures are articulated for conserving Core Habitat for covered species, Essential Ecological Processes necessary to maintain habitat viability, Biological Corridors, and Linkages as needed, and the less common Conserved Natural Communities. Conservation Goals are managed within the Conservation Areas as a Reserve System. The Conservation Goals of the CVMSHCP Reserve System are: - Represent native ecosystem types or natural communities across their natural range of variation in a system of conserved areas. - Maintain or restore self-sustaining populations or metapopulations of the species included in the Plan to ensure permanent Conservation so that Take Authorization can be obtained for currently Listed Species (animal species) and Non-listed Species can be covered in case they are listed in the future. - Sustain ecological and evolutionary processes necessary to maintain the functionality of the conserved natural communities and Habitats for the species included in the Plan. - Maximize connectivity among populations and avoid Habitat fragmentation within Conservation Areas to conserve biological diversity, ecological balance, and connected populations of Covered Species. - Minimize adverse impacts from OHV use, illegal dumping, edge effects, exotic species, and other disturbances in accordance with the Management and Monitoring Programs. - Manage the Conservation Areas adaptively to be responsive to short-term and long-term environmental change and new science. Under the CVMSHCP, a Take Authorization, except for three of the covered species, is allowed for covered activities in accordance with the federal Endangered Species Act (ESA) and the California Natural Community Conservation Planning Act. Covered activities include development permitted or approved by local permittees, which includes new projects approved pursuant to county and city general plans. Take activities are limited within Conservation Areas. Mitigation for the impacts of development on the covered species and their habitats is through payment of a fee to the City of Desert Hot Springs which is in turn used by the Coachella Valley Conservation 308 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT, JURISDICTIONAL DELINEATION, AND CVMSHCP CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS FOR THE SHADOW RIDGE DEVELOPMENT, CITY OF PALM DESERT, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Jennings Environmental Page | 6 Commission to minimize and mitigate impacts of the Taking and provide for the conservation of the covered and non-covered species through the acquisition and maintenance of habitat. 2.6 VEGETATION All plant species observed within the Project site were recorded. Vegetation communities within the Project site were identified, qualitatively described, and mapped onto a high-resolution imagery aerial photograph. Plant communities were determined in accordance with the Manual of California Vegetation, Second Edition (Sawyer et al. 2009). Plant nomenclature follows that of The Jepson Manual, Second Edition (Baldwin et al. 2012). A comprehensive list of the plant species observed during the survey is provided in Appendix D. 2.7 WILDLIFE All wildlife and wildlife signs observed and detected, including tracks, scat, carcasses, burrows, excavations, and vocalizations, were recorded. Additional survey time was spent in those habitats most likely to be utilized by wildlife (native vegetation, wildlife trails, etc.) or in habitats with the potential to support state- and/or federally listed or otherwise special-status species. Notes were made on the general habitat types, species observed, and the conditions of the Project site. A comprehensive list of the wildlife species observed during the survey is provided in Appendix D. SECTION 3.0 – RESULTS 3.1 LITERATURE REVIEW RESULTS According to the CNDDB, CNPSEI, and other relevant literature and databases, 33 sensitive species including 7 listed species and 1 sensitive habitat, have been documented in the Cathedral City and Myoma quads. This list of sensitive species and habitats includes any State and/or federally-listed threatened or endangered species, CDFW-designated Species of Special Concern (SSC), and otherwise Special Animals. “Special Animals” is a general term that refers to all of the taxa the CNDDB is interested in tracking, regardless of their legal or protection status. This list is also referred to as the list of “species at risk” or “special status species.” The CDFW considers the taxa on this list to be those of greatest conservation need. An analysis of the likelihood for the occurrence of all CNDDB and CNPSEI sensitive species documented in the Cathedral City and Myoma quads is provided in Table 2, in Appendix D. This analysis takes into account species range as well as documentation within the vicinity of the project area and includes the habitat requirements for each species and the potential for their occurrence on the site, based on required habitat elements and range relative to the current site conditions. 3.1.1 SOILS After a review of the USDA Soil Conservation Service and by referencing the USDA NRCS Web Soil Survey (USDA 2023), it was determined that the Project site is located within the Riverside County, Coachella Valley Area, California (Area CA680). The Project site contains two (2) soil types: 309 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT, JURISDICTIONAL DELINEATION, AND CVMSHCP CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS FOR THE SHADOW RIDGE DEVELOPMENT, CITY OF PALM DESERT, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Jennings Environmental Page | 7 Myoma fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes (MaB). This soil is somewhat excessively drained with a high to very high capacity to transmit water. This soil consists of windblown sandy alluvium, typically ranges in elevations around -200 to 1,800 feet above mean sea level (amsl), and is considered prime farmland if irrigated. Myoma fine sand, 5 to 15 percent slopes (MaD). This soil is somewhat excessively drained with a high to very high capacity to transmit water. This soil consists of windblown sandy alluvium, typically ranges in elevations around -200 to 1,800 feet above mean sea level (amsl), and is considered prime farmland if irrigated. Although the soils on-site were historically mapped, the site shows signs of significant disturbance. Tire tracks and pedestrian tracks were visible along the entire site. The southern portion of the site is currently being used as a materials stockpile location and portions of the northern area showed signs of past material storage. The Shadow Ridge facility is currently storing vegetation, rocks, dirt, and other materials related to the daily operations of the facility. Therefore, although the site was historically mapped as Myoma fine sands, the soils within portions of the site are no longer qualified as such. 3.1.2 JURISDICTIONAL WATERS Aerial imagery of the site was examined and compared with the surrounding USGS 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle maps to identify drainage features within the survey area as indicated by topographic changes, blue-line features, or visible drainage patterns. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Water Program “My Waters” data layers were also reviewed to determine whether any hydrologic features and wetland areas had been documented within the vicinity of the site. Similarly, the Soil maps from the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) - Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Web Soil Survey (USDA 2023) were reviewed to identify the soil series on-site and to check if they have been identified regionally as hydric soils. Upstream and downstream connectivity of waterways (if present) was reviewed in the field, on aerial imagery, and topographic maps to determine jurisdictional status. No obvious signs of jurisdictional features were observed during the literature review. 3.1.3 DESIGNATED CRITICAL HABITAT The site is not located within or adjacent to any USFWS-designated Critical Habitat. No further action is required. 3.1.4 HYDROLOGY AND HYDROLOGIC CONNECTIVITY Hydrologically, the project site is located within the Indio Hydrologic Sub-Area (HSA 719.47), as identified on the Calwater Watershed maps. This area comprises a 540,057-acre drainage area within the larger Upper Whitewater River Hydrologic Area (Hydrologic Unit Code [HUC10] 1810020106) (CalTrans, 2023). The Upper Whitewater River watershed in Cathedral City is bordered to the north by the Black Rock Springs- Coyote Well and Quail Wash watersheds, to the east by the Upper Pinto Wash and Middle Whitewater River watersheds, to the south by the Deep Canyon watershed, and to the west by the Palm Canyon Wash and Headwaters Whitewater River watershed (Figure 3 in Appendix A). 310 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT, JURISDICTIONAL DELINEATION, AND CVMSHCP CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS FOR THE SHADOW RIDGE DEVELOPMENT, CITY OF PALM DESERT, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Jennings Environmental Page | 8 3.1.5 SPECIAL STATUS SPECIES BACKGROUND Desert Tortoise (Gopherus agassizii) The desert tortoise is a State and federally listed threatened species. Throughout its range, it is threatened by habitat loss, domestic grazing, predation, collections, and increased mortality rates. The desert tortoise is typically found in creosote bush scrub. They are most often found on level or sloped ground where the substrate is firm but not too rocky. Tortoise burrows are typically found at the base of shrubs, in the sides of washes and hillsides. Because a single tortoise may have many burrows distributed throughout its home range, it is not possible to predict the exact numbers of individuals on a site based upon burrow numbers. In 1992 the US Bureau of Land Management issued the California Statewide Desert Tortoise Management Policy which included categorizing habitat into three levels of classification. The management goal for Category I areas is to maintain stable, viable populations and to increase the population where possible. The management goal for Category II areas is to maintain stable, viable populations. The management goal for Category III areas is to limit population declines to the extent feasible. In April 1993, the BLM amended the CDCA plan to delineate these three categories of desert tortoise habitat on public lands. Although habitat categories apply only to public lands administered by the BLM, regulatory agencies typically determine habitat compensation ratios based on the nearest BLM habitat categories. With the adoption of the West Mojave Plan, all lands that are outside Desert Wildlife Management Areas, including the subject parcel, are characterized as Category 3 Habitat, which is the lowest priority management area for viable populations of the desert tortoise. Burrowing owl (BUOW) {Athene cunicularia} The BUOW is a state and federal SSC. This owl is a mottled, brownish and sand-colored, dove-sized raptor, with large, yellow eyes, a rounded head lacking ear tufts, white eyebrows, and long legs compared to other owl species. It is a ground-dwelling owl typically found in arid prairies, fields, and open areas where vegetation is sparse and low to the ground. The BUOW is heavily dependent upon the presence of mammal burrows, with ground squirrel burrows being a common choice, in its habitat to provide shelter from predators, inclement weather, and to provide a nesting place. They are also known to make use of human-created structures, such as cement culverts and pipes, for burrows. BUOW spends a great deal of time standing on dirt mounds at the entrance to a burrow or perched on a fence post or other low to the ground perch from which they hunt for prey. BUOW frequently hunt by hovering in place above the ground and dropping on their prey from above. They feed primarily on insects such as grasshoppers, June beetles, and moths, but will also take small rodents, birds, and reptiles. They are active during the day and night but are considered a crepuscular owl; generally observed in the early morning hours or at twilight. The breeding season for BUOW is February 1 through August 31. Up to 11, but typically 7 to 9, eggs are laid in a burrow, abandoned pipe, or other subterranean hollows where incubation is complete in 28-30 days. Young BUOW fledges in 44 days. The BUOW is considered a migratory species in portions of its range, which includes western North America from Canada to Mexico, and east to Texas and Louisiana. BUOW populations in California are considered to be sedentary or locally migratory. 311 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT, JURISDICTIONAL DELINEATION, AND CVMSHCP CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS FOR THE SHADOW RIDGE DEVELOPMENT, CITY OF PALM DESERT, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Jennings Environmental Page | 9 Throughout its range, the BUOW is vulnerable to habitat loss, predation, vehicular collisions, and destruction of burrow sites, and the poisoning of ground squirrels (Grinnell and Miller 1944, Zarn 1974, Remsen 1978). BUOW has disappeared from significant portions of their range in the last 15 years and, overall, nearly 60% of the breeding groups of owls known to have existed in California during the 1980s had disappeared by the early 1990s (Burrowing Owl Consortium 1993). The BUOW is not listed under the state or federal Endangered Species Act but is considered both a federal and state Species of Special Concern. The BUOW is a migratory bird protected by the international treaty under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918 and by State law under the California Fish and Game Code (CDFG Code #3513 & #3503.5). Coachella Valley Fringe-toed Lizard (Uma inornata) The Coachella Valley fringe-toed lizard is restricted to fine, wind-blown sand of dunes, flats, riverbanks and washes in the Coachella Valley. This species is found in creosote bush scrub and other sparse scrub habitats with suitable sandy soils. They occur from near sea level up to 1600 feet elevation in suitable habitat. This species is active at temperatures between 95° to 110° F. The Coachella Valley fringe-toed lizard is especially adapted to live in sand dunes. It has fringes on the rear toes that enable it to move easily and swiftly on loose sand. In addition, the Coachella Valley fringe-toed lizard hides from predators by “swimming”, or rapidly digging down and through loose sand to bury itself. It has a countersunk jaw to prevent sand from entering its mouth when it burrows. This historical distribution of this species includes the former sand dunes in the Coachella Valley. This distribution has contracted due to residential and commercial development in the Valley areas below the Pass. This species is now found only in the non-developed sand dunes of the upper Coachella Valley south of Interstate 10, and sand dunes north of the Interstate 10 freeway. Loss of habitat to development and fragmentation of large dune areas have severely restricted the range and population numbers of this species. The Coachella Valley fringe-toed lizard is listed as threatened by the USFWS and endangered by the CDFW. 3.1.6 CVMSHCP Prior to the field visit, the CVMSHCP website and databases were searched. This includes the CVMSHCP plan itself and any relevant protocol survey requirements. The database also includes a mapping program that contains site-specific information related to criteria cell location, special survey areas for plants and animals, and vegetation mapping. 3.2 FIELD STUDY RESULTS 3.2.1 HABITAT The habitat on-site consists of sparse vegetation with a mixture of Brittle bush scrub (Encelia farinosa Shrubland Alliance) and bare ground. Table 1 in Appendix D contains a list of all plants found on-site. The site is disturbed with evidence of past material storage and current material storage. Also, the site is surrounded by a developed golf course. There was also evidence of human disturbance in the form of foot traffic and tire marks. 312 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT, JURISDICTIONAL DELINEATION, AND CVMSHCP CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS FOR THE SHADOW RIDGE DEVELOPMENT, CITY OF PALM DESERT, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Jennings Environmental Page | 10 3.2.2 WILDLIFE Species observed or otherwise detected on or in the vicinity of the project site during the surveys included; mourning dove (Zenaida macroura) and common raven (Corvus corax). Table 1 in Appendix D contains a list of all animal species found on-site. 3.2.3 SPECIAL STATUS SPECIES Desert Tortoise No suitable habitat for desert tortoises exists within the Project site or surrounding area. There are no documented desert tortoise occurrences within the Project site or the surrounding area, and this species is not expected to occur within the Project area. Additionally, the Project site is outside of the Designated Critical Habitat for this species. Therefore, no potential direct or indirect impacts on desert tortoise can be identified, and presence/absence surveys for this species are not warranted or recommended. Burrowing owl (BUOW) Based on the October 2023 field survey, the site does not contain suitable habitat for this species. No burrowing owls were observed during the site visit. No burrows of any kind were located within the Project site. No portion of the Project site showed any evidence of past or present BUOW activity. No feathers, whitewash, or castings were found and no suitable burrow surrogate species are present on- site. Therefore, no suitable habitat exists on-site, and no focused surveys are required. Coachella Valley Fringe-toed Lizard The sand sheets and sand dunes preferred by the Coachella Valley fringe-toed lizard do not exist on site. The site is completely surrounded by development and is not subject to the historical wind regimes this species prefers. Additionally, as mentioned above, the soils on-site have been altered by the current and historical stockpiling from the Shadow Ridge Facility. Therefore, there is no suitable habitat for this species and this species is considered absent from the site. 3.2.4 NESTING BIRDS The Project site and immediate surrounding area does contain habitat suitable for nesting birds. As such the Project is subject to the following nesting bird regulations. Recommendations for avoidance and minimization are in section 4. Migratory Bird Treaty Act The Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918. This Act implements four international conservation treaties that the U.S. entered into with Canada in 1916, Mexico in 1936, Japan in 1972, and Russia in 1976. It is intended to ensure the sustainability of populations of all protected migratory bird species. The Act has been amended with the signing of each treaty, as well as when any of the treaties were amended, such as with Mexico in 1976 and Canada in 1995. The Act prohibits the take (including killing, capturing, selling, trading, and transport) of protected migratory bird species without prior authorization by the Department of Interior U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 313 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT, JURISDICTIONAL DELINEATION, AND CVMSHCP CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS FOR THE SHADOW RIDGE DEVELOPMENT, CITY OF PALM DESERT, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Jennings Environmental Page | 11 California Fish and Game Code The Project site is also subject to Sections 3503 and 3503.5 of the Fish and Game Code. Section 3503 states, “It is unlawful to take, possess, or needlessly destroy the nest or eggs of any bird, except as otherwise provided by this code or any regulation made pursuant thereto”. And Section 3503.5 states, “It is unlawful to take, possess, or destroy any birds in the orders Falconiformes or Strigiformes (birds-of- prey) or to take, possess, or destroy the nest or eggs of any such bird except as otherwise provided by this code or any regulation adopted pursuant thereto”. 3.2.5 JURISDICTIONAL WATERS Waters of the United States and Waters of the State The USACE has the authority to permit the discharge of dredged or fill material in Waters of the U.S. (WOUS) under Section 404 CWA. While the Regional Water Quality Board has authority over the discharge of dredged or fill material in Waters of the State under Section 401 CWA as well as the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act. The Project area was surveyed with 100 percent visual coverage and no drainage features were present on site that met the definition for WOUS. As such, the subject parcel does not contain any wetlands, Waters of the U.S., or Waters of the State. Fish and Game Code Section 1602 - State Lake and/or Streambed The CDFW asserts jurisdiction over any drainage feature that contains a definable bed and bank or associated riparian vegetation. The Project area was surveyed with 100 percent visual coverage and no definable bed or bank features exist on the project site. As such, the subject parcel does not contain any areas under CDFW jurisdiction. 3.2.6 WETLANDS NWI maps did not identify portions within the Project site as a Riverine/Riparian system. Additionally, none of the requirements for wetland designation (hydric vegetation, hydric soils, and/or wetland hydrology) were present on site. As such, there are no wetlands currently present on site. 3.3 CVMSHCP CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS The entire subject parcel falls within the boundaries of the CVMSHCP. However, the project site is not located within a Conservation Area (Figure 4 in Appendix A). As such, there are no conservation requirements for the Project under the CVMSHCP. However, every Project completed within the boundaries of the CVMSHCP is required to pay a Development Impact Fee to the City or County, depending on location, prior to obtaining permits. Because this Project is within the boundaries of the CVMSHCP, it will be required to submit this fee to the City. The amount of the fee will be determined by the City. SECTION 4.0 - CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the literature review and personal observations made in the immediate vicinity, no State and/or federally-listed threatened or endangered species are documented/or expected to occur within the Project site. Additionally, no plant species with the California Rare Plant Rank (CRPR) of 1 or 2 were observed on-site or documented/expected to occur on-site. 314 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT, JURISDICTIONAL DELINEATION, AND CVMSHCP CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS FOR THE SHADOW RIDGE DEVELOPMENT, CITY OF PALM DESERT, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Jennings Environmental Page | 12 Jurisdictional Delineation There are no streams, channels, washes, or swales that meet the definitions of Section 1600 of the State of California Fish and Game Code (FGC) under the jurisdiction of the CDFW, Section 401 (“Waters of the State” ) of the Clean Water Act (CWA) under the jurisdiction of the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), or “Waters of the United States” (WoUS) as defined by Section 404 of the CWA under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) within the subject parcel. Therefore, no permit from any regulatory agency will be required. Nesting Birds Since there is some habitat within the Project site and adjacent area that is suitable for nesting birds in general, the following mitigation measure should be implemented. Nesting bird nesting season generally extends from February 1 through September 15 in southern California and specifically, March 15 through August 31 for migratory passerine birds. To avoid impacts to nesting birds (common and special status) during the nesting season, a qualified Avian Biologist will conduct pre-construction Nesting Bird Surveys (NBS) no more than 3-days prior to Project-related disturbance to nestable vegetation to identify any active nests. If no active nests are found, no further action will be required. If an active nest is found, the biologist will set appropriate no-work buffers around the nest which will be based upon the nesting species, its sensitivity to disturbance, nesting stage, and expected types, intensity, and duration of the disturbance. The nests and buffer zones shall be field-checked weekly by a qualified biological monitor. The approved no-work buffer zone shall be clearly marked in the field, within which no disturbance activity shall commence until the qualified biologist has determined the young birds have successfully fledged and the nest is inactive. CVMSHCP The Project is considered consistent with the CVMSHCP as long as the Local Development Mitigation Fees are paid to the City, prior to obtaining permits. The following mitigation measure is recommended. Prior to construction and issuance of any grading permit, the City of Palm Desert shall ensure compliance with the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (CVMSHCP) and its associated Implementing Agreement and shall ensure that payment of the CVMSHCP Local Development Mitigation Fee for the proposed Project is remitted to the Coachella Valley Conservation Commission. I hereby certify that the statements furnished herein, and in the attached exhibits present data and information required for this analysis to the best of my ability, and the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. This report was prepared in accordance with professional requirements and standards. Fieldwork conducted for this assessment was performed by me. I certify that I have not signed a non-disclosure or consultant confidentiality agreement with the project proponent and that I have no financial interest in the project. 315 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT, JURISDICTIONAL DELINEATION, AND CVMSHCP CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS FOR THE SHADOW RIDGE DEVELOPMENT, CITY OF PALM DESERT, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Jennings Environmental Page | 13 Please do not hesitate to contact me at 909-534-4547 should you have any questions or require further information. Sincerely, Gene Jennings Principal/Regulatory Specialist Appendices: Appendix A – Figures Appendix B – Site Photos Appendix C – Regulatory Framework Appendix D – Tables 316 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT, JURISDICTIONAL DELINEATION, AND CVMSHCP CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS FOR THE SHADOW RIDGE DEVELOPMENT, CITY OF PALM DESERT, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Jennings Environmental Page | 14 Section 5 – REFERENCES Baldwin, B.G., D.H. Goldman, D.J. Keil, R. Patterson, and T.J. Rosatti, and D.H. Wilken (editors) 2012 The Jepson Manual: Vascular Plants of California, Second Edition. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA. Barbour, M.G., J.H. Burk, W.D. Pitts, F.S. Gilliam, and M.W. Schwartz. 1999 Terrestrial Plant Ecology, Third Edition. Addison Wesley Longman, Inc. Menlo Park, CA. California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) 2023 California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB). RareFind Version 3.1.0. Database Query, California USGS 7.5 minute quadrangles. Wildlife and Habitat Data Analysis Branch. [Accessed November 2023] California Department of Fish and Game. 1995. Staff report on burrowing owl mitigation. Memo from C.F. Raysbrook, Interim Director to Biologist, Environmental Services Division, Department of Fish and Game. Sacramento, CA. California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG). 2012. Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation. State of California Natural Resources Agency. March 7, 2012. California Department of Transportation. Water Quality Planning Tool. http://svctenvims.dot.ca.gov/wqpt/wqpt.aspx (Accessed November 2023) California Native Plant Society (CNPS) 2020 Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants (online edition, v8-03 0.39). Rare Plant Scientific Advisory Committee, California Native Plant Society, Sacramento, California. Website http://www.rareplants.cnps.org; [Accessed November 2023]. Sawyer, J.O., Jr., T. Keeler-Wolf, J. Evens 2009 A Manual of California Vegetation, Second Edition. California Native Plant Society, Sacramento, CA. U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) 2023 Soil Survey Staff, Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture. Official Soil Series Descriptions [Online Edition]. Website https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/WebSoilSurvey.aspx [Accessed November 2023]. 317 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT, JURISDICTIONAL DELINEATION, AND CVMSHCP CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS FOR THE SHADOW RIDGE DEVELOPMENT, CITY OF PALM DESERT, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Jennings Environmental Page | 15 Appendix A - Figures 318 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT, JURISDICTIONAL DELINEATION, AND CVMSHCP CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS FOR THE SHADOW RIDGE DEVELOPMENT, CITY OF PALM DESERT, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Jennings Environmental Page | 16 319 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT, JURISDICTIONAL DELINEATION, AND CVMSHCP CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS FOR THE SHADOW RIDGE DEVELOPMENT, CITY OF PALM DESERT, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Jennings Environmental Page | 17 320 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT, JURISDICTIONAL DELINEATION, AND CVMSHCP CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS FOR THE SHADOW RIDGE DEVELOPMENT, CITY OF PALM DESERT, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Jennings Environmental Page | 18 321 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT, JURISDICTIONAL DELINEATION, AND CVMSHCP CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS FOR THE SHADOW RIDGE DEVELOPMENT, CITY OF PALM DESERT, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Jennings Environmental Page | 19 322 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT, JURISDICTIONAL DELINEATION, AND CVMSHCP CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS FOR THE SHADOW RIDGE DEVELOPMENT, CITY OF PALM DESERT, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Jennings Environmental Page | 20 Appendix B - Photos 323 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT, JURISDICTIONAL DELINEATION, AND CVMSHCP CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS FOR THE SHADOW RIDGE DEVELOPMENT, CITY OF PALM DESERT, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Jennings Environmental Page | 21 Photo 1 – Center of site, facing south. Photo 2 – Center of site, facing northeast. 324 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT, JURISDICTIONAL DELINEATION, AND CVMSHCP CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS FOR THE SHADOW RIDGE DEVELOPMENT, CITY OF PALM DESERT, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Jennings Environmental Page | 22 Photo 3 – Center of site, facing north. Photo 4 – Center of site, facing northeast. 325 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT, JURISDICTIONAL DELINEATION, AND CVMSHCP CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS FOR THE SHADOW RIDGE DEVELOPMENT, CITY OF PALM DESERT, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Jennings Environmental Page | 23 Photo 5 – Material stockpile in the northern section of site. Photo 6 – Material stockpile in the southern section of site. 326 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT, JURISDICTIONAL DELINEATION, AND CVMSHCP CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS FOR THE SHADOW RIDGE DEVELOPMENT, CITY OF PALM DESERT, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Jennings Environmental Page | 24 Photo 7 – Material stockpile in the southern section of site. Photo 8 – Proposed location of 4 foot sidewalk. 327 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT, JURISDICTIONAL DELINEATION, AND CVMSHCP CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS FOR THE SHADOW RIDGE DEVELOPMENT, CITY OF PALM DESERT, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Jennings Environmental Page | 25 Appendix C – Regulatory Framework 328 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT, JURISDICTIONAL DELINEATION, AND CVMSHCP CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS FOR THE SHADOW RIDGE DEVELOPMENT, CITY OF PALM DESERT, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Jennings Environmental Page | 26 1.1 FEDERAL JURISDICTION 1.1.1 United States Army Corps of Engineers Activities within inland streams, wetlands, and riparian areas in California are regulated by agencies at the federal, state, and regional levels. At the federal level, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Regulatory Program regulates activities within wetlands and waters of the US pursuant to Section 404 of the Federal Clean Water Act (CWA). At the state level, the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) regulates activities within the bed, bank, and associated habitat of a stream under the Fish and Game Code §§ 1600– 1616. The California State Water Resources Board (SWRB) delegates authority at the regional level to Regional Water Quality Control Boards (RWQCB) that are responsible for regulating discharge into waters of the US under Section 401 of the federal CWA and waters of the State under the California Porter-Cologne Water Quality Act. The CWA was implemented to maintain and restore the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the Waters of the United States (33 Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] Part 328 Section 328.3). “Waters of the US” are defined as follows: § 328.3 Definitions. For the purpose of this regulation these terms are defined as follows: (a) Waters of the United States means: (1) Waters which are: (i) Currently used, or were used in the past, or may be susceptible to use in interstate or foreign commerce, including all waters which are subject to the ebb and flow of the tide; (ii) The territorial seas; or (iii) Interstate waters, including interstate wetlands; (2) Impoundments of waters otherwise defined as waters of the United States under this definition, other than impoundments of waters identified under paragraph (a)(5) of this section; (3) Tributaries of waters identified in paragraph (a)(1) or (2) of this section: (i) That are relatively permanent, standing or continuously flowing bodies of water; or (ii) That either alone or in combination with similarly situated waters in the region, significantly affect the chemical, physical, or biological integrity of waters identified in paragraph (a)(1) of this section; (4) Wetlands adjacent to the following waters: (i) Waters identified in paragraph (a)(1) of this section; or (ii) Relatively permanent, standing or continuously flowing bodies of water identified in paragraph (a)(2) or (a)(3)(i) of this section and with a continuous surface connection to those waters; or 329 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT, JURISDICTIONAL DELINEATION, AND CVMSHCP CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS FOR THE SHADOW RIDGE DEVELOPMENT, CITY OF PALM DESERT, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Jennings Environmental Page | 27 (iii) Waters identified in paragraph (a)(2) or (3) of this section when the wetlands either alone or in combination with similarly situated waters in the region, significantly affect the chemical, physical, or biological integrity of waters identified in paragraph (a)(1) of this section; (5) Intrastate lakes and ponds, streams, or wetlands not identified in paragraphs (a)(1) through (4) of this section: (i) That are relatively permanent, standing or continuously flowing bodies of water with a continuous surface connection to the waters identified in paragraph (a)(1) or (a)(3)(i) of this section; or (ii) That either alone or in combination with similarly situated waters in the region, significantly affect the chemical, physical, or biological integrity of waters identified in paragraph (a)(1) of this section. (b) The following are not ‘‘waters of the United States’’ even where they otherwise meet the terms of paragraphs (a)(2) through (5) of this section: (1) Waste treatment systems, including treatment ponds or lagoons, designed to meet the requirements of the Clean Water Act; (2) Prior converted cropland designated by the Secretary of Agriculture The exclusion would cease upon a change of use, which means that the area is no longer available for the production of agricultural commodities. Notwithstanding the determination of an area’s status as prior converted cropland by any other Federal agency, for the purposes of the Clean Water Act, the final authority regarding Clean Water Act jurisdiction remains with EPA; (3) Ditches (including roadside ditches) excavated wholly in and draining only dry land and that do not carry a relatively permanent flow of water; (4) Artificially irrigated areas that would revert to dry land if the irrigation ceased; (5) Artificial lakes or ponds created by excavating or diking dry land to collect and retain water and which are used exclusively for such purposes as stock watering, irrigation, settling basins, or rice growing; (6) Artificial reflecting or swimming pools or other small ornamental bodies of water created by excavating or diking dry land to retain water for primarily aesthetic reasons; (7) Waterfilled depressions created in dry land incidental to construction activity and pits excavated in dry land for the purpose of obtaining fill, sand, or gravel unless and until the construction or excavation operation is abandoned and the resulting body of water meets the definition of waters of the United States; and (8) Swales and erosional features (e.g., gullies, small washes) characterized by low volume, infrequent, or short duration flow. (c) In this section, the following definitions apply: 330 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT, JURISDICTIONAL DELINEATION, AND CVMSHCP CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS FOR THE SHADOW RIDGE DEVELOPMENT, CITY OF PALM DESERT, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Jennings Environmental Page | 28 (1) Wetlands means those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or ground water at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. Wetlands generally include swamps, marshes, bogs, and similar areas. (2) Adjacent means bordering, contiguous, or neighboring. Wetlands separated from other waters of the United States by man-made dikes or barriers, natural river berms, beach dunes, and the like are ‘‘adjacent wetlands.’’ (3) High tide line means the line of intersection of the land with the water’s surface at the maximum height reached by a rising tide. The high tide line may be determined, in the absence of actual data, by a line of oil or scum along shore objects, a more or less continuous deposit of fine shell or debris on the foreshore or berm, other physical markings or characteristics, vegetation lines, tidal gages, or other suitable means that delineate the general height reached by a rising tide. The line encompasses spring high tides and other high tides that occur with periodic frequency but does not include storm surges in which there is a departure from the normal or predicted reach of the tide due to the piling up of water against a coast by strong winds such at those accompanying a hurricane or other intense storm. (4) Ordinary high water mark means that line on the shore established by the fluctuations of water and indicated by physical characteristics such as clear, natural line impressed on the bank, shelving, changes in the character of soil, destruction of terrestrial vegetation, the presence of litter and debris, or other appropriate means that consider the characteristics of the surrounding areas. (5) Tidal waters means those waters that rise and fall in a predictable and measurable rhythm or cycle due to the gravitational pulls of the moon and sun. Tidal waters end where the rise and fall of the water surface can no longer be practically measured in a predictable rhythm due to masking by hydrologic, wind, or other effects. (6) Significantly affect means a material influence on the chemical, physical, or biological integrity of waters identified in paragraph (a)(1) of this section. To determine whether waters, either alone or in combination with similarly situated waters in the region, have a material influence on the chemical, physical, or biological integrity of waters identified in paragraph (a)(1) of this section, the functions identified in paragraph (c)(6)(i) of this section will be assessed and the factors identified in paragraph (c)(6)(ii) of this section will be considered: (i) Functions to be assessed: 331 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT, JURISDICTIONAL DELINEATION, AND CVMSHCP CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS FOR THE SHADOW RIDGE DEVELOPMENT, CITY OF PALM DESERT, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Jennings Environmental Page | 29 (A) Contribution of flow; (B) Trapping, transformation, filtering, and transport of materials (including nutrients, sediment, and other pollutants); (C) Retention and attenuation of floodwaters and runoff; (D) Modulation of temperature in waters identified in paragraph (a)(1) of this section; or (E) Provision of habitat and food resources for aquatic species located in waters identified in paragraph (a)(1) of this section; (ii) Factors to be considered: (A) The distance from a water identified in paragraph (a)(1) of this section; (B) Hydrologic factors, such as the frequency, duration, magnitude, timing, and rate of hydrologic connections, including shallow subsurface flow; (C) The size, density, or number of waters that have been determined to be similarly situated; (D) Landscape position and geomorphology; an (E) Climatological variables such as temperature, rainfall, and snowpack. 1.2 STATE JURISDICTION The State of California (State) regulates discharge of material into waters of the State pursuant to Section 401 of the CWA as well as the California Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act (Porter-Cologne; California Water Code, Division 7, §13000 et seq.). Waters of the State are defined by Porter-Cologne as “any surface water or groundwater, including saline waters, within the boundaries of the state” (Water Code Section 13050(e)). Waters of the State broadly includes all waters within the State’s boundaries (public or private), including waters in both natural and artificial channels. 1.2.1 Regional Water Quality Control Board Under Porter-Cologne, the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) and the local Regional Water Quality Control Boards (RWQCB) regulate the discharge of waste into waters of the State. Discharges of waste include “fill, any material resulting from human activity, or any other ‘discharge’ that may directly or indirectly impact ‘waters of the state.’” Porter-Cologne reserves the right for the State to regulate activities that could affect the quantity and/or quality of surface and/or groundwaters, including isolated wetlands, within the State. Wetlands were defined as waters of the State if they demonstrated both wetland hydrology and hydric soils. Waters of the State determined to be jurisdictional for these purposes require, if impacted, waste discharge requirements (WDRs). 332 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT, JURISDICTIONAL DELINEATION, AND CVMSHCP CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS FOR THE SHADOW RIDGE DEVELOPMENT, CITY OF PALM DESERT, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Jennings Environmental Page | 30 When an activity results in fill or discharge directly below the OHWM of jurisdictional waters of the United States (federal jurisdiction), including wetlands, a CWA Section 401 Water Quality Certification is required. If a proposed project is not subject to CWA Section 401 certification but involves activities that may result in a discharge to waters of the State, the project may still be regulated under Porter-Cologne and may be subject to waste discharge requirements. In cases where waters apply to both CWA and Porter-Cologne, RWQCB may consolidate permitting requirements to one permit. 1.2.2 California Department of Fish and Wildlife Pursuant to Division 2, Chapter 6, Sections 1600-1602 of the California Fish and Game Code, the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) regulates all diversions, obstructions, or changes to the natural flow or bed, channel, or bank of any river, stream, or lake, which supports fish or wildlife. CDFW defines a “stream” (including creeks and rivers) as “a body of water that flows at least periodically or intermittently through a bed or channel having banks and supports fish or other aquatic life. This includes watercourses having surface or subsurface flow that supports or has supported riparian vegetation” (California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Section 1.72). The jurisdiction of CDFW may include areas in or near intermittent streams, ephemeral streams, rivers, creeks, dry washes, sloughs, blue-line streams that are indicated on USGS maps, watercourses that may contain subsurface flows, or within the flood plain of a water body. CDFW’s definition of “lake” includes “natural lakes or man-made reservoirs.” CDFW limits of jurisdiction typically include the maximum extents of the uppermost bank-to-bank distance and/or the outermost extent of riparian vegetation dripline, whichever measurement is greater. In a CDFW guidance of stream processes and forms in dryland watersheds (Vyverberg 2010), streams are identified as having one or more channels that may all be active or receive water only during some high flow event. Subordinate features, such as low flow channels, active channels, banks associated with secondary channels, floodplains, and stream-associated vegetation, may occur within the bounds of a single, larger channel. The water course is defined by the topography or elevations of land that confine a stream to a definite course when its waters rise to their highest level. A watercourse is defined as a stream with boundaries defined by the maximal extent or expression on the landscape even though flow may otherwise be intermittent or ephemeral. Artificial waterways such as ditches (including roadside ditches), canals, aqueducts, irrigation ditches, and other artificially created water conveyance systems also may be under the jurisdiction of CDFW. CDFW may claim jurisdiction over these features based on the presence of habitat characteristics suitable to support aquatic life, riparian vegetation, and/or stream- dependent terrestrial wildlife. As with natural waterways, the limit of CDFW jurisdiction of 333 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT, JURISDICTIONAL DELINEATION, AND CVMSHCP CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS FOR THE SHADOW RIDGE DEVELOPMENT, CITY OF PALM DESERT, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Jennings Environmental Page | 31 artificial waterways includes the uppermost bank-to-bank distance and/or the outermost extent of riparian vegetation dripline, whichever measurement is greater. CDFW does not have jurisdiction over wetlands but has jurisdiction to protect against a net loss of wetlands. CDFW supports the wetland criteria recognized by USFWS; one or more indicators of wetland conditions must exist for wetlands conditions to be considered present. The following is the USFWS accepted definition of a wetland: Wetlands are lands transitional between terrestrial and aquatic systems where the water table is usually at or near the surface or the land is covered by shallow water. For purposes of this classification, wetlands must have one or more of the following three attributes: (1) at least periodically, the lands supports hydrophytes, (2) the substrate is predominantly undrained hydric soil; and (3) the substrate is nonsoil and is saturated withwater or covered by shallow water at some time during the growing season of each year (Cowardin et al. 1979). In A Clarification of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s Wetland Definition (Tiner 1989), the USFWS definition was further clarified “that in order for any area to be classified as wetland by the Service, the area must be periodically saturated or covered by shallow water, whether wetland vegetation and/or hydric soils are present or not; this hydrologic requirement is addressed in the first sentence of the definition.” When considering whether an action would result in a net loss of wetlands, CDFW will extend jurisdiction to USFWS-defined wetland conditions where such conditions exist within the riparian vegetation that is associated with a stream or lake and does not depend on whether those features meet the three-parameter USACE methodology of wetland determination. If impacts to wetlands under the jurisdiction of CDFW are unavoidable, a mitigation plan will be implemented in coordination with CDFW to support the CDFW policy of “no net loss” of wetland habitat. 334 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT, JURISDICTIONAL DELINEATION, AND CVMSHCP CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS FOR THE SHADOW RIDGE DEVELOPMENT, CITY OF PALM DESERT, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Jennings Environmental Page | 32 Appendix D – Tables 335 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT, JURISDICTIONAL DELINEATION, AND CVMSHCP CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS FOR THE SHADOW RIDGE DEVELOPMENT, CITY OF PALM DESERT, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Jennings Environmental Page | 33 Table 1. Species Observed On-Site Common Name Scientific Name Plants Brittlebush Encelia farinosa Schismus grass Schismus sp. Asian mustard Brassica tournefortii Dyebush Psorothamnus emoryi Salt cedar Tamarix ramosissima Common burrowbush Ambrosia dumosa Arrowweed Pluchea sericea Red sand verbena Abronia maritima Blue gum Eucalyptus globulus Chuckwalla’s delight Bebbia juncea Mesquite Prosopis glandulosa Rush milkweed Asclepias subulata Hairy sand verbena Abronia villosa Birds Anna’s hummingbird Calypte anna Costa’s hummingbird Calypte costae White-crowned sparrow Zonotrichia leucophrys Mourning dove Zenaida macroura House finch Haemorhous mexicanus Lesser roadrunner Geococcyx velox Say’s phoebe Sayornis saya Common raven Corvus corax Mammals Desert cottontail Sylvilagus audubonii 336 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT, JURISDICTIONAL DELINEATION, AND CVMSHCP CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS FOR THE SHADOW RIDGE DEVELOPMENT, CITY OF PALM DESERT, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Jennings Environmental Page | 34 Table 2 – CNDDB and CNPSEI Potential to Occur for the Cathedral City and Myoma quads Scientific Name Common Name Federal/State Status Other Status Habitat Potential to Occur Abronia villosa var. aurita chaparral sand-verbena None, None G5T2?, S2, 1B.1 Chaparral, coastal scrub, desert dunes. Sandy areas. -60-1570 m. Suitable habitat for this species does not occur on site. As such, this species is considered absent from the Project site. Astragalus hornii var. hornii Horn's milk- vetch None, None GUT1, S1, 1B.1 Meadows and seeps, playas. Lake margins, alkaline sites. 75-350 m. Suitable habitat for this species does not occur on site. As such, this species is considered absent from the Project site. Astragalus lentiginosus var. coachellae Coachella Valley milk- vetch Endangered, None G5T1, S1, 1B.2 Sonoran desert scrub, desert dunes. Sandy flats, washes, outwash fans, sometimes on dunes. 35-695 m. Suitable habitat for this species does not occur on site. As such, this species is considered absent from the Project site. Astragalus tricarinatus triple-ribbed milk-vetch Endangered, None G2, S2, 1B.2 Joshua tree woodland, Sonoran desert scrub. Hot, rocky slopes in canyons and along edge of boulder-strewn desert washes, with Larrea and Encelia. 455-1585 m. Suitable habitat for this species does not occur on site. As such, this species is considered absent from the Project site. Athene cunicularia burrowing owl None, None G4, S2, CDFW- SSC Open, dry annual or perennial grasslands, deserts, and scrublands characterized by low- growing vegetation. Subterranean nester, dependent upon burrowing mammals, most notably, the California ground squirrel. Suitable habitat for this species does not occur on site. As such, this species is considered absent from the Project site. 337 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT, JURISDICTIONAL DELINEATION, AND CVMSHCP CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS FOR THE SHADOW RIDGE DEVELOPMENT, CITY OF PALM DESERT, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Jennings Environmental Page | 35 Scientific Name Common Name Federal/State Status Other Status Habitat Potential to Occur Chaetodipus fallax pallidus pallid San Diego pocket mouse None, None G5T3T4, S3S4 Desert border areas of San Diego, Riverside, San Bernardino, and Los Angeles counties in desert wash, desert scrub, desert succulent scrub, pinyon-juniper, etc. Sandy, herbaceous areas, usually in association with rocks or coarse gravel. Suitable habitat for this species does not occur on site. As such, this species is considered absent from the Project site. Cyprinodon macularius desert pupfish Endangered, Endangered G1, S1 Desert ponds, springs, marshes and streams in Southern California. Can live in salinities from freshwater to 68 ppt; can withstand temps from 9 - 45 C and dissolved oxygen levels down to 0.1 ppm. Suitable habitat for this species does not occur on site. As such, this species is considered absent from the Project site. Desert Fan Palm Oasis Woodland Desert Fan Palm Oasis Woodland None, None G3, S3.2 Riparian woodland This habitat type does not occur on-site. Dinacoma caseyi Casey's June beetle Endangered, None G1, S1 Found only in two populations in a small area of southern Palm Springs. Found in sandy soils; the females live underground and only come to the ground surface to mate. Suitable habitat for this species does not occur on site. As such, this species is considered absent from the Project site. Dipodomys merriami collinus Earthquake Merriam's kangaroo rat None, None G5T2?, S2 Known only from San Diego and Riverside counties. Associated with riversidean sage scrub, chaparral, and non-native grassland. Need sandy loam substrates for digging of burrows. Suitable habitat for this species does not occur on site. As such, this species is considered absent from the Project site. 338 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT, JURISDICTIONAL DELINEATION, AND CVMSHCP CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS FOR THE SHADOW RIDGE DEVELOPMENT, CITY OF PALM DESERT, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Jennings Environmental Page | 36 Scientific Name Common Name Federal/State Status Other Status Habitat Potential to Occur Empidonax traillii extimus southwestern willow flycatcher Endangered, Endangered G5T2, S3 Riparian woodlands in Southern California. Suitable habitat for this species does not occur on site. As such, this species is considered absent from the Project site. Eremothera boothii ssp. boothii Booth's evening- primrose None, None G5T4, S3, 2B.3 Joshua tree woodland, pinyon and juniper woodland. 285-2290 m. Suitable habitat for this species does not occur on site. As such, this species is considered absent from the Project site. Euphorbia abramsiana Abrams' spurge None, None G4, S2, 2B.2 Mojavean desert scrub, Sonoran desert scrub. Sandy sites. -45- 1445 m. Suitable habitat for this species does not occur on site. As such, this species is considered absent from the Project site. Euphorbia arizonica Arizona spurge None, None G5, S3, 2B.3 Sonoran desert scrub. Sandy soils. 150-900 m. Suitable habitat for this species does not occur on site. As such, this species is considered absent from the Project site. Euphorbia platysperma flat-seeded spurge None, None G3, S1, 1B.2 Mojavean desert scrub, desert dunes. Sandy places or shifting dunes. Possibly a waif in California; more common in Arizona and Mexico. 60-960 m. Suitable habitat for this species does not occur on site. As such, this species is considered absent from the Project site. Falco mexicanus prairie falcon None, None G5, S4, CDFW- WL Inhabits dry, open terrain, either level or hilly. Breeding sites located on cliffs. Forages far afield, even to marshlands and ocean shores. Suitable habitat for this species does not occur on site. As such, this species is considered absent from the Project site. 339 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT, JURISDICTIONAL DELINEATION, AND CVMSHCP CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS FOR THE SHADOW RIDGE DEVELOPMENT, CITY OF PALM DESERT, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Jennings Environmental Page | 37 Scientific Name Common Name Federal/State Status Other Status Habitat Potential to Occur Lanius ludovicianus loggerhead shrike None, None G4, S4, CDFW- SSC Broken woodlands, savannah, pinyon-juniper, Joshua tree, and riparian woodlands, desert oases, scrub and washes. Prefers open country for hunting, with perches for scanning, and fairly dense shrubs and brush for nesting. Suitable habitat for this species does not occur on site. As such, this species is considered absent from the Project site. Lasiurus xanthinus western yellow bat None, None G4G5, S3, CDFW-SSC Found in valley foothill riparian, desert riparian, desert wash, and palm oasis habitats. Roosts in trees, particularly palms. Forages over water and among trees. Suitable habitat for this species does not occur on site. As such, this species is considered absent from the Project site. Macrobaenetes valgum Coachella giant sand treader cricket None, None G1G2, S2 Known from the sand dune ridges in the vicinity of Coachella Valley. Population size regulated by amount of annual rainfall; some spots favor permanent habitation where springs dampen sand. Suitable habitat for this species does not occur on site. As such, this species is considered absent from the Project site. Nemacaulis denudata var. gracilis slender cottonheads None, None G3G4T3?, S2, 2B.2 Coastal dunes, desert dunes, Sonoran desert scrub. In dunes or sand. -45-745 m. Suitable habitat for this species does not occur on site. As such, this species is considered absent from the Project site. Neotoma lepida intermedia San Diego desert woodrat None, None G5T3T4, S3S4, CDFW-SSC Coastal scrub of Southern California from San Diego County to San Luis Obispo County. Moderate to dense canopies preferred. They are particularly abundant in rock outcrops, rocky cliffs, and slopes. Suitable habitat for this species does not occur on site. As such, this species is considered absent from the Project site. 340 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT, JURISDICTIONAL DELINEATION, AND CVMSHCP CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS FOR THE SHADOW RIDGE DEVELOPMENT, CITY OF PALM DESERT, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Jennings Environmental Page | 38 Scientific Name Common Name Federal/State Status Other Status Habitat Potential to Occur Oliarces clara cheeseweed owlfly (cheeseweed moth lacewing) None, None G1G3, S2 Inhabits the lower Colorado River drainage. Found under rocks or in flight over streams. Larrea tridentata is the suspected larval host. Suitable habitat for this species does not occur on site. As such, this species is considered absent from the Project site. Perognathus longimembris bangsi Palm Springs pocket mouse None, None G5T2, S1, CDFW-SSC Desert riparian, desert scrub, desert wash and sagebrush habitats. Most common in creosote-dominated desert scrub. Rarely found on rocky sites. Occurs in all canopy coverage classes. Suitable habitat for this species does not occur on site. As such, this species is considered absent from the Project site. Petalonyx linearis narrow-leaf sandpaper- plant None, None G4, S3?, 2B.3 Mojavean desert scrub, Sonoran desert scrub. Sandy or rocky canyons. -30-1090 m. Suitable habitat for this species does not occur on site. As such, this species is considered absent from the Project site. Phrynosoma mcallii flat-tailed horned lizard None, None G3, S3, CDFW- SSC Restricted to desert washes and desert flats in central Riverside, eastern San Diego, and Imperial counties. Critical habitat element is fine sand, into which lizards burrow to avoid temperature extremes; requires vegetative cover and ants. Suitable habitat for this species does not occur on site. As such, this species is considered absent from the Project site. Polioptila californica californica coastal California gnatcatcher Threatened, None G4G5T3Q, S2, CDFW-SSC Obligate, permanent resident of coastal sage scrub below 2500 ft in Southern California. Low, coastal sage scrub in arid washes, on mesas and slopes. Not all areas classified as coastal sage scrub are occupied. Suitable habitat for this species does not occur on site. As such, this species is considered absent from the Project site. 341 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT, JURISDICTIONAL DELINEATION, AND CVMSHCP CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS FOR THE SHADOW RIDGE DEVELOPMENT, CITY OF PALM DESERT, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Jennings Environmental Page | 39 Scientific Name Common Name Federal/State Status Other Status Habitat Potential to Occur Selaginella eremophila desert spike- moss None, None G4, S2S3, 2B.2 Sonoran desert scrub, chaparral. Shaded sites, gravelly soils; crevices or among rocks. 225-1570 m. Suitable habitat for this species does not occur on site. As such, this species is considered absent from the Project site. Stemodia durantifolia purple stemodia None, None G5, S2, 2B.1 Sonoran desert scrub. Sandy soils; mesic sites. 35-385 m. Suitable habitat for this species does not occur on site. As such, this species is considered absent from the Project site. Stenopelmatus cahuilaensis Coachella Valley jerusalem cricket None, None G1G2, S2 Inhabits a small segment of the sand and dune areas of the Coachella Valley, in the vicinity of Palm Springs. Found in the large, undulating dunes piled up at the north base of Mt San Jacinto. Suitable habitat for this species does not occur on site. As such, this species is considered absent from the Project site. Toxostoma lecontei Le Conte's thrasher None, None G4, S3 Desert resident; primarily of open desert wash, desert scrub, alkali desert scrub, and desert succulent scrub habitats. Commonly nests in a dense, spiny shrub or densely branched cactus in desert wash habitat, usually 2-8 feet above ground. Suitable habitat for this species does not occur on site. As such, this species is considered absent from the Project site. Uma inornata Coachella Valley fringe- toed lizard Threatened, Endangered G1Q, S1 Limited to sandy areas in the Coachella Valley, Riverside County. Requires fine, loose, windblown sand (for burrowing), interspersed with hardpan and widely-spaced desert shrubs. Suitable habitat for this species does not occur on site. As such, this species is considered absent from the Project site. 342 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT, JURISDICTIONAL DELINEATION, AND CVMSHCP CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS FOR THE SHADOW RIDGE DEVELOPMENT, CITY OF PALM DESERT, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Jennings Environmental Page | 40 Scientific Name Common Name Federal/State Status Other Status Habitat Potential to Occur Xerospermophilus tereticaudus chlorus Palm Springs round-tailed ground squirrel None, None G5T2Q, S2, CDFW-SSC Restricted to the Coachella Valley. Prefers desert succulent scrub, desert wash, desert scrub, alkali scrub, and levees. Prefers open, flat, grassy areas in fine-textured, sandy soil. Density correlated with winter rainfall. Suitable habitat for this species does not occur on site. As such, this species is considered absent from the Project site. Xylorhiza cognata Mecca-aster None, None G2, S2, 1B.2 Sonoran desert scrub. Steep canyon slopes, in sandstone and clay. 20-305 m. Suitable habitat for this species does not occur on site. As such, this species is considered absent from the Project site. 343 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT, JURISDICTIONAL DELINEATION, AND CVMSHCP CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS FOR THE SHADOW RIDGE DEVELOPMENT, CITY OF PALM DESERT, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Jennings Environmental Page | 41 Coding and Terms E = Endangered T = Threatened C = Candidate FP = Fully Protected SSC = Species of Special Concern R = Rare State Species of Special Concern: An administrative designation given to vertebrate species that appear to be vulnerable to extinction because of declining populations, limited acreages, and/or continuing threats. Raptor and owls are protected under section 3502.5 of the California Fish and Game code: “It is unlawful to take, possess or destroy any birds in the orders Falconiformes or Strigiformes or to take, possess or destroy the nest or eggs of any such bird.” State Fully Protected: The classification of Fully Protected was the State's initial effort in the 1960's to identify and provide additional protection to those animals that were rare or faced possible extinction. Lists were created for fish, mammals, amphibians and reptiles. Fully Protected species may not be taken or possessed at any time and no licenses or permits may be issued for their take except for collecting these species for necessary scientific research and relocation of the bird species for the protection of livestock. Global Rankings (Species or Natural Community Level): G1 = Critically Imperiled – At very high risk of extinction due to extreme rarity (often 5 or fewer populations), very steep declines, or other factors. G2 = Imperiled – At high risk of extinction due to very restricted range, very few populations (often 20 or fewer), steep declines, or other factors. G3 = Vulnerable – At moderate risk of extinction due to a restricted range, relatively few populations (often 80 or fewer), recent and widespread declines, or other factors. G4 = Apparently Secure – Uncommon but not rare; some cause for long-term concern due to declines or other factors. G5 = Secure – Common; widespread and abundant. ? = Uncertainty in the exact status of an element (could move up or down one direction from current rank) Subspecies Level: Taxa which are subspecies or varieties receive a taxon rank (T-rank) attached to their G-rank. Where the G-rank reflects the condition of the entire species, the T-rank reflects the global situation of just the subspecies. For example: the Point Reyes mountain beaver, Aplodontia rufa ssp. phaea is ranked G5T2. The G-rank refers to the whole species range i.e., Aplodontia rufa. The T-rank refers only to the global condition of ssp. phaea. State Ranking: S1 = Critically Imperiled – Critically imperiled in the State because of extreme rarity (often 5 or fewer populations) or because of factor(s) such as very steep declines making it especially vulnerable to extirpation from the State. S2 = Imperiled – Imperiled in the State because of rarity due to very restricted range, very few populations (often 20 or fewer), steep declines, or other factors making it very vulnerable to extirpation from the State. S3 = Vulnerable – Vulnerable in the State due to a restricted range, relatively few populations (often 80 or fewer), recent and widespread declines, or other factors making it vulnerable to extirpation from the State. S4 = Apparently Secure – Uncommon but not rare in the State; some cause for long-term concern due to declines or other factors. S5 = Secure – Common, widespread, and abundant in the State. California Rare Plant Rankings (CNPS List): 1A = Plants presumed extirpated in California and either rare or extinct elsewhere. 1B = Plants rare, threatened, or endangered in California and elsewhere. 2A = Plants presumed extirpated in California, but common elsewhere. 2B = Plants rare, threatened, or endangered in California, but more common elsewhere. 3 = Plants about which more information is needed; a review list. 4 = Plants of limited distribution; a watch list. Threat Ranks: .1 = Seriously threatened in California (over 80% of occurrences threatened / high degree and immediacy of threat) .2 = Moderately threatened in California (20-80% occurrences threatened / moderate degree and immediacy of threat) .3 = Not very threatened in California (less than 20% of occurrences threatened / low degree and immediacy of threat or no current threats known) 344 City of Palm Desert Shadow Ridge Project, PP 23-0023/VTTM 38866 SECTION 15183 ANALYSIS TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES APPENDIX 3 345 Mojave Archaeological Consulting, LLC December 2023 CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT FOR THE SHADOW RIDGE PROJECT TENTATIVE TRACT MAP (TTM) 28818-1 CITY OF PALM DESERT RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA FOR SUBMITTAL TO: CITY OF PALM DESERT 73510 FRED WARING DRIVE PALM DESERT, CA 92260 PREPARED FOR: Tom Dodson and Associates 2150 North Arrowhead Avenue San Bernardino, CA 92405 PREPARED BY: Michelle Hart, M.A. Mojave Archaeological Consulting, LLC PO Box 271 Joshua Tree, CA 92252 346 Mojave Archaeological Consulting, LLC December 2023 Document Details Document Title Cultural Resources Assessment for the Shadow Ridge Project, Tentative Tract Map (TTM) 28818-1 Document Subtitle City of Palm Desert, Riverside County, California Date 15 December 2023 Author Michelle Hart, M.A. Consulting Firm Mojave Archaeological Consulting, LLC For Submittal to City of Palm Desert Prepared for Tom Dodson and Associates USGS Quadrangle 7.5-minute Cathedral City, California; Section 32, T4S R6E, San Bernardino Baseline and Meridian 347 Cultural Resources Assessment for the Shadow Ridge Project, Tentative Tract Map (TTM) 28818-1 December 2023 Page i ABSTRACT ABSTRACT At the request of Tom Dodson and Associates, Mojave Archaeological Consulting, LLC, conducted a cultural resources investigation for the proposed Shadow Ridge Project, in the City of Palm Desert, Riverside County, California. This report is prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as part of the Initial Study for the project. Pursuant to the provisions of CEQA and state and local CEQA guidelines, the City of Palm Desert is the Lead Agency for the proposed project. Toll Brothers proposes to develop a 20.69-acre site for a residential gated community. The project site is located within Marriot’s 306-acre Shadow Ridge property. Toll Brothers plans to develop 93 single-family resort-oriented residences. The residences will each range in size from 2,216 square feet to 2,425 square feet and will be situated on variable sized lots that will be a minimum of 5,500 square feet if the City approves the Tentative Tract Map (TTM 28818-1). In addition to the construction of 93 homes, the project will include the removal of an existing storage facility, road paving, storm drain and sidewalk installation, the construction of two open space lots that will served as bioretention basins, and the installation of utilities and wastewater connections. The project site is in Coachella Valley, in the City of Palm Desert, southeast of Monterey Avenue and Gerald Fort Drive on the USGS Topo 7.5-minute map for Cathedral City, CA, within Section 32, Township 4 South, and Range 6 East. This report describes the methods and results of the cultural resources investigation of the project area, which included a records search and literature review, a Sacred Lands File (SLF) search with the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), and an intensive pedestrian survey of the 20.69-acre project site. The purpose of the investigation was to provide the City of Palm Desert with the information and analysis necessary to determine the potential for the proposed project to impact “historical resources” and “archaeological resources” under CEQA. The records search performed by the Eastern Information Center (EIC) of the California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS), included a 0.5-mile-wide buffer (study area), and indicated eight previous cultural resources investigations and no cultural resources are documented within the 0.5-mile study area. Of the previous investigations, none have covered any portion of the project site. No cultural resources have been previously documented within the 20.69-acre project site. The SLF search with the NAHC was completed with negative results. Mojave Archaeological Consulting conducted an intensive pedestrian survey of the project site on 20 November 2023. An Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians (ACBCI) Cultural Resources Analyst also participated in the field survey. No cultural resources, either historic or prehistoric, were located during the survey. The negative findings of the survey and the project area’s previously disturbed environmental setting indicate that buried archaeological deposits are unlikely. Considering these findings, Mojave Archaeological Consulting recommends to the City of Palm Desert that the proposed project will have no impact on historical or archaeological resources. No further cultural resources work or monitoring measures are recommended necessary for the proposed project activities. However, in the event that buried cultural materials are encountered during construction, all work should be halted in the vicinity of the discovery and a qualified archaeologist should be contacted to assess the significance and integrity of the find. If intact and significant archaeological remains are encountered, the impacts of the project should be mitigated appropriately and any such discoveries, and subsequent evaluation and treatment, should be documented in a cultural resources report. Additionally, Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5, CEQA Statute & Guidelines Section 15064.5(e), and PRC Section 5097.98 mandate the process to be followed in the event of an accidental discovery of human remains. Finally, if the project area is expanded to include areas not covered by this survey or other recent cultural resource assessments in the study area, additional cultural resource investigations may be required. 348 Cultural Resources Assessment for the Shadow Ridge Project, Tentative Tract Map (TTM) 28818-1 December 2023 Page ii CONTENTS CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Overview ............................................................................................................................................... 1 2 SITE DESCRIPTION .......................................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Current Site Use ................................................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Topography and Geology ..................................................................................................................... 5 2.3 Local Climate and Ecology ................................................................................................................... 5 3 CULTURAL PERSPECTIVE .............................................................................................................. 8 3.1 Prehistoric Chronology ......................................................................................................................... 8 3.1.1 Terminal Pleistocene (12,000 to 10,000 cal B.P.) ................................................................ 8 3.1.2 Paleo-Indian Complex .......................................................................................................... 8 3.1.3 Early Holocene (10,000 to 8500 cal B.P.) ............................................................................ 9 3.1.4 Lake Mojave Complex ......................................................................................................... 9 3.1.5 Middle Holocene (8500 to 4000 cal B.P.) ............................................................................. 9 3.1.6 The Pinto Complex .............................................................................................................. 9 3.1.7 Late Holocene (4000 cal B.P. to Contact) .......................................................................... 10 3.1.8 The Gypsum Complex (4000 to 1800 B.P.) ....................................................................... 10 3.1.9 The Rose Spring Complex (1800 to 900 B.P.) ................................................................... 10 3.1.10 The Late Prehistoric Period (900 B.P. to Contact) ............................................................. 11 3.2 Ethnographic Setting .......................................................................................................................... 12 3.3 Historical Setting ................................................................................................................................. 12 4 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ....................................................................................................... 14 4.1 California Environment Quality Act ..................................................................................................... 14 4.2 California Register of Historical Resources Criteria of Evaluation ...................................................... 14 4.3 Regulations Concerning Discovery of Human Remains ..................................................................... 15 4.4 Senate Bill 18 ...................................................................................................................................... 16 4.5 Assembly Bill 52 ................................................................................................................................. 16 5 METHODS ........................................................................................................................................ 18 5.1 Literature and Records Search ........................................................................................................... 18 5.2 Sacred Lands File Search and Native American Outreach ................................................................. 18 5.3 Field Methods ..................................................................................................................................... 19 6 RESULTS ......................................................................................................................................... 20 6.1 Previous Investigations ....................................................................................................................... 20 6.2 Previously Identified Resources .......................................................................................................... 20 6.3 Newly Recorded Resources – Intensive Pedestrian Inventory Results .............................................. 20 7 CONCLUSION AND MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS ....................................................... 20 8 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................................. 22 349 Cultural Resources Assessment for the Shadow Ridge Project, Tentative Tract Map (TTM) 28818-1 December 2023 Page iii CONTENTS SACRED LANDS FILE SEARCH AND TRIBAL CORRESPONDENCE List of Plates and Figures Figure 1 Project Area Vicinity…..……………………………………………………………………….2 Figure 2 Project Location…………………………….......................................................................3 Figure 3 Project Area…………………………………………………………………………………….4 Plates 1 to 4 Project Area and Setting ……………………………........................................................6 List of Tables Table 6.1-1 Previous Surveys within 0.5-Mile of the Project Area…………………………………....20 Acronyms and Abbreviations ACBCI Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians B.P. before present ca. circa cal calibrated years CCR California Code of Regulations CCS cryptocrystalline silica CEQA California Environmental Quality Act CHRIS California Historical Resources Information System cm centimeter CRHR California Register of Historical Resources DPR California Department of Parks and Recreation EIC Eastern Information Center GLO General Land Office GPS Global Positioning System m meter NAHC Native American Heritage Commission NPS National Park Service OHP Office of Historic Preservation PRC Public Resources Code SLF Sacred Lands Files USGS United States Geological Survey 350 Cultural Resources Assessment for the Shadow Ridge Project, Tentative Tract Map (TTM) 28818-1 December 2023 Page 1 INTRODUCTION 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Overview Toll Brothers proposes to develop a residential gated community at a 20.69-acre site located within Marriot’s Shadow Ridge property. Project plans include the construction of 93 single-family resort- oriented residences. The residences will range in size from 2,216 square feet to 2,425 square feet and will be situated lots that will be a minimum of 5,500 square feet if the City approves the Tentative Tract Map (TTM 28818-1). The project will also include the removal of an existing storage facility, road paving, storm drain and sidewalk installation, the construction of two open space lots that will served as bioretention basins, and the installation of utilities and wastewater connections. The 20.69-acre project site includes APN’s 694-290-010, 694-290-011, 694-320-010, 694-320-011 and is situated southeast of Monterey Avenue and Gerald Fort Drive in Palm Desert, Riverside County. Currently, the site consists of mostly vacant land, bisected by paved Shadow Ridge Road, with an existing small storage facility located on the north end of the property. The Shadow Ridge golf course surrounds the property to the east, south, and west. Single-family residences are also present to the east and time share units, Marriot’s Shadow Ridge Golf Club, and parking areas are present to the northwest. The Palm Desert Police Department compound is located north of the site. The project is subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Initial technical studies to evaluate the potential environmental impacts of the project include a Phase I cultural resources assessment of the project site. Tom Dodson and Associates retained Mojave Archaeological Consulting, LLC, to conduct the cultural resources investigation for project compliance with CEQA. The City of Palm Desert is the Lead Agency for compliance with CEQA. Michelle Hart, M.A, served as Principal Investigator for the current study. Ms. Hart initiated records searches with the Eastern Information Center (EIC) and the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), and completed background research, survey fieldwork, and report writing. Claritsa Duarte, Cultural Resources Analyst representing the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indian’s Tribal Historic Preservation Office, participated in the field survey. EIC staff completed the archaeological records search. This report presents a site description (Section 2); the cultural context, which provides a review of the prehistoric and historic background for the project area (Section 3); the regulatory framework that mandates consideration of cultural resources in project planning (Section 4); the methods used in the field survey and resource evaluation (Section 5); the results of the study (Section 6); conclusions and recommendations (Section 7); and references cited (Section 8). 351 Cultural Resources Assessment for the Shadow Ridge Project, Tentative Tract Map (TTM) 28818-1 December 2023 Page 2 INTRODUCTION Figure 1: Project Vicinity 352 Cultural Resources Assessment for the Shadow Ridge Project, Tentative Tract Map (TTM) 28818-1 December 2023 Page 3 INTRODUCTION Figure 2: Project Location, USGS 7.5’ Topographic Quadrangle: Cathedral City, CA 353 Cultural Resources Assessment for the Shadow Ridge Project, Tentative Tract Map (TTM) 28818-1 December 2023 Page 4 INTRODUCTION Figure 3: Project Area on NAIP Aerial Imagery (Data Source: USGS Earth Explorer) 354 Cultural Resources Assessment for the Shadow Ridge Project, Tentative Tract Map (TTM) 28818-1 December 2023 Page 5 SITE DESCRIPTION 2 SITE DESCRIPTION 2.1 Current Site Use The project site consists of mostly vacant land. The Shadow Ridge golf course surrounds the property to the east, south, and west. Single-family residences are also present to the east. Time share units, Marriot’s Shadow Ridge Golf Club, and parking areas are present to the northwest. The Palm Desert Police Department compound is located just north of the site. The project site bisected by paved northeast to southwest-trending Shadow Ridge Road. A short north to south-trending asphalt paved road is located is located on the south side of the property; along the road are several recently disturbed areas with piles of mulch, gravel, and other landscaping materials. Several small unimproved dirt roads also cross the site, providing access to the surrounding golf course from Shadow Ridge Road. A temporary small storage facility with shipping containers is located on the north end of the property. The entirety of the site appears to have been previously graded and contoured using heavy equipment. Buried to semi- buried PVC irrigation pipe and sprinkler heads are present throughout the site. 2.2 Topography and Geology The project area is in Palm Desert, within the Coachella Valley. The Coachella Valley is at the junction of three natural geomorphic provinces—the Transverse Ranges, the Peninsular Ranges, and the Colorado Desert. It is at the northernmost extent of the Salton Trough which results from tectonic activity of the San Andreas fault, which lies at the northeastern side of the Coachella Valley. Elevations on the Coachella Valley floor range from 1600-feet above sea level, near Palm Springs, to 250-feet below sea level at the Salton Sink. The project area lies at an elevation of approximately 300-feet and is relatively flat. The area is surrounded on the southwest by the Santa Rosa Mountains, by the San Jacinto Mountains to the west, the Little San Bernardino Mountains to the east, and San Gorgonio Mountain to the north. U SGS geological maps define the project area and surrounding vicinity as part of the Salton Sea hydrologic unit. It is comprised of Holocene and Quaternary surficial alluvial sand and gravel valley deposits (USGS 2023). The project area is dominated by a dunal surface with loose fine-to-medium grained sands, and small granitic and quartzite gravels. Organic horizons appear to be absent. During the field survey, cut banks, rodent burrows, and areas of disturbance demonstrated homogenous and unconsolidated sands . 2.3 Local Climate and Ecology Palm Desert has a very dry desert climate with less than three inches of average precipitation annually. High temperatures in the summer are very hot and can exceed 110-degrees Fahrenheit, with temperatures rarely dropping below 80-degrees. Winters are comparatively mild with lows averaging 40- 60-degrees. Vegetation in the general vicinity of the project area is dominated by the creosote bush scrub community which consists of a variety of shrubs, cacti, and grasses (Sawyer 1994; Vasek and Barbour 1977). Common plant species include creosote bush (Larrea tridentata), Mormon tea (Ephedra californica, Ephedra nevadensis), brittlebush (Encelia farinosa) white bursage (Ambrosia dumosa), littleleaf ratany (Krameria erecta), cholla (Cylindropuntia bigelovii), beavertail prickly pear cacti (Opuntia basilaris) and galleta grass (Hilaria rigida). The region also provides habitat for a variety of fauna including bobcat, desert kit fox, jackrabbits, cottontail rabbits, desert kangaroo rats, ground squirrels, bighorn sheep, coyote, Gambel’s quail, desert tortoise, rattlesnakes, and other species. 355 Cultural Resources Assessment for the Shadow Ridge Project, Tentative Tract Map (TTM) 28818-1 December 2023 Page 6 SITE DESCRIPTION Plate 1: Overview of the project site with paved Shadow Ridge Road visible, view to the northeast. Plate 2: Storage area at north end of project site, view to the north. 356 Cultural Resources Assessment for the Shadow Ridge Project, Tentative Tract Map (TTM) 28818-1 December 2023 Page 7 SITE DESCRIPTION Plate 3: Recently disturbed area and piles of landscaping materials at southwest end of project site, view towards the northeast. Plate 4: Overview of project site with Shadow Ridge Road visible, view to the southwest. 357 Cultural Resources Assessment for the Shadow Ridge Project, Tentative Tract Map (TTM) 28818-1 December 2023 Page 8 CULTURAL PERSPECTIVE 3 CULTURAL PERSPECTIVE The following presents a cultural context for the project vicinity. This overview addresses the broader perspective of prehistoric and historic use in the area and is based upon numerous past reports and synthesis that summarize the history of human occupation in the California desert. This context is summarized from recent reports, as well as cultural frameworks from several decades of past regional archaeological research, including that of Cambell (1931), Rogers (1929, 1939), Schaefer (1994), Schaefer and Laylander (2007), Sutton et al. (2007); Warren (1980, 1984); Warren and Crabtree (1986), and Wilke (1978) among others, as cited below. 3.1 Prehistoric Chronology One of the most commonly cited prehistoric cultural frameworks for the California desert was proposed by Claude Warren (1980, 1984; Warren and Crabtree 1986). Warren’s outline for human occupation in the California desert divided prehistory into five distinct archaeological periods. Warren associated these periods with changes in climate related to the terminal Pleistocene and Holocene epoch s. These include Lake Mojave, Pinto, Gypsum, and Late Prehistoric periods. Some studies have asserted the presence of archaeological assemblages dating to periods earlier than Lake Mojave; however, as discussed by Warren and Crabtree (1986), the validity of these studies is controversial, and they have little or no relationship to later cultural developments in the region. Sutton et al. (2007) expanded on Warren’s framework and use the term “complex” to emphasize cultural rather than temporal association, deferring temporal association to the term “period,” which they associate with geologic time. Subdivisions of th is cultural framework proposed by Sutton et al. (2007) include hypothetical “Pre-Clovis” and “Paleo-Indian” complexes, and the Lake Mojave, Pinto, Dead Man Lake, Gypsum, Rose Spring, and Late Prehistoric complexes. 3.1.1 Terminal Pleistocene (12,000 to 10,000 cal B.P.) During the Terminal Pleistocene, glaciers retreated under comparatively warm conditions and vegetation and animals began to move to higher elevations. Paleoenvironmental and geomorphologic investigations indicate that the climate, vegetation, and landscape across the North American continent, including the inland Southern California region, changed dramatically at the end of the Pleistocene. The climate changed from wet and cool conditions to a drier and warmer regime (Anderson 2001). In general terms, the desert interior may have been more ecologically productive and more attractive to prehistoric groups than the inland areas farther to the west and south during the Early Holocene (ca. 10,000–8000 B.P.). 3.1.2 Paleo-Indian Complex To date, the Paleo-Indian complex within the California desert is represented exclusively by the Clovis material culture; however, the relationship with later stemmed points is also a consideration. Some early research has proposed the theory of two different traditions relating to interior and coastal adaptation during the Late Pleistocene to Early Holocene transition. Based on work in the Panamint Valley, Davis (1970) posited the theory of “Paleo-Desert,” a geographic distinction from Paleo-Indian sites of the “Paleo-Coastal” tradition. In the Paleo-Desert geographic region, Paleo-Indian sites are generally located along the shorelines of ancient pluvial lakes (Davis 1970). One common theme among nearly all known Paleo-Indian complex sites in North America is the tool assemblage, which includes fluted spear points, typically made from fine-grained lithic material. Fluted points, defined as a component of the Clovis material culture in California, have been found throughout most of the state from coastal est uary environments to ancient Pleistocene lakeshores, which are now in desert areas. Near the area of Cajon Pass in nearby San Bernardino County, at least five sites that contained fluted projectile points have been identified. These sites suggest an early occupation of approximately 12,000 B.P., which corresponds to 358 Cultural Resources Assessment for the Shadow Ridge Project, Tentative Tract Map (TTM) 28818-1 December 2023 Page 9 CULTURAL PERSPECTIVE the “hypothetical Pre-Clovis” (pre-10,000 B.P.) complex (Sutton et al. 2007). In addition to fluted points, the Paleo-Indian tool assemblage was composed mainly of scrapers, burins, awls, and choppers, which were used for processing animals and other food resources. 3.1.3 Early Holocene (10,000 to 8500 cal B.P.) During the Early Holocene, a changing climate altered the distribution of flo ral and faunal communities. Human economic activities of the Early Holocene were focused on the pluvial lakes and their environs where people could fish, take waterfowl and their eggs, harvest aquatic plants and mollusks, and hunt for large and small game. A small number of ground stone artifacts suggest limited grinding of hard seeds, representing a shift to a more diversified and generalized economy (Sutton 1996). Milling slabs and manos for seed processing are rare in Early Holocene sites relative to their abundance in late r periods, suggesting the milling of vegetation seems not to have been very important (Grayson 2011). A high incidence of imported materials (including marine shell) evidences wider spheres of interaction than what was seen previously. As interpreted by Sutton et al. (2007), collectively, the data indicate a “forager-like” strategy organized around relatively small social units. 3.1.4 Lake Mojave Complex Ground stone implements in the material culture are seen in low frequency during this time, from which limited hard seed grinding activities can be inferred. This has been interpreted as representative of a shift toward a more diversified and generalized economy (Sutton 1996; Sutton et al. 2007). The high incidence of non-local materials and marine shell is interpreted as wider spheres of interaction than previously seen. Cultural materials dating from this complex encompass the Playa cultures, as described by Rogers (1939), the San Dieguito complex (Warren 1967), and the Lake Mojave complex (Warren and Crabtree 1986). This phase is considered ancestral to the Early Archaic cultures of the Pinto complex. Campbell et al. (1937) describe Lake Mojave assemblages as including Lake Mojave series projectile points (leaf- shaped, long-stemmed points with narrow shoulders) and Silver Lake points (short-bladed, stemmed points with distinct shoulders). Other diagnostic items include flaked stone crescents; abundant bifaces; and a variety of large, well-made scrapers, gravers, perforators, and heavy core tools (Sutton et al. 2007). 3.1.5 Middle Holocene (8500 to 4000 cal B.P.) During the Middle Holocene, climatic conditions were warmer and drier than during the Ice Age or Early Holocene. Terms including “Altithermal,” “Hypsithermal,” and “Mid-Holocene Climatic Optimum” have been proposed since the 1940s to refer to the long periods of sustained drought. Lake levels declined ; marshes, streams, and other wetland habitat dried up; the range of xeric shrublands expanded ; and hardwood vegetation communities retreated to higher elevations. The cumulative result was that the land’s carrying capacity for wildlife and humans declined substantially. Some parts of the Desert West may have been abandoned by people for long periods, while other areas witnessed a marked reduction of population density (Grayson 2011). 3.1.6 The Pinto Complex The Pinto complex represents a broad continuity in the use of flaked stone technology, including less reliance on obsidian and cryptocrystalline silicates (CCS), as well as the prevalence of ground stone implements in the material culture, which distinguishes this complex from the earlier Lake Mojave complex (Sutton et al. 2007). Warren (1984) proposed that cultural adaptation to the changing desert environment between 7500 and 5000 B.P. may account for the material characteristics of the Pinto complex, which gradually replaced those of the Lake Mojave complex. The age and catalysts for the technological adaptations noted in the Pinto complex remain a topic of dispute. Sutton et al. (2007) cite work conducted at the military installations of Fort Irwin and Twentynine Palms that produced radiocarbon 359 Cultural Resources Assessment for the Shadow Ridge Project, Tentative Tract Map (TTM) 28818-1 December 2023 Page 10 CULTURAL PERSPECTIVE dates as early as 8820 B.P. associated with Pinto complex assemblages. These dates push back the beginnings of the complex as coincidental with the Lake Mojave complex. The Pinto complex is marked by the appearance of Pinto-series projectile points, which are characterized as thick, and shouldered with expanding stem and concave bases. Pinto points were typically produced by percussion reduction, and demonstrate limited pressure retouch. Other characteristics of the Pinto assemblage are bifacial and unifacial core tools, and an increase in milling stones. 3.1.7 Late Holocene (4000 cal B.P. to Contact) Current archaeological data indicate there may have been a hiatus of occupation within the inland desert regions between the Middle and Late Holocene periods, as few sites have been found that date between 5000 and 4000 B.P. It is believed that climatic changes during this period resulted in hotter and drier conditions, which may have led to the abandonment of the region for approximately 1,000 years when people migrated to areas with more suitable climates (Sutton et al. 2007). 3.1.8 The Gypsum Complex (4000 to 1800 B.P.) Technologically, the artifact assemblage of the Gypsum complex was similar to that of the preceding Pinto complex, although new tools were added either as innovations or “borrowed” from other cultures as adaptations to the desert environment. Gypsum complex sites are characterized by medium- to large- stemmed and corner-notched projectile points (these include Elko series, Humboldt Concave Base, and Gypsum styles). In addition, rectangular-based knives, flake scrapers, and occasionally, large scraper planes, choppers, hammerstones, handstones, and milling tools become relatively comm on, and the mortar and pestle appear for the first time. It is believed that ritual activities became important, evidenced by split-twig figurines and petroglyphs depicting hunting scenes. Finally, increased contact with neighboring groups likely provided the desert occupants important storable foodstuffs during less productive seasons or years, in exchange for high-quality lithic materials such as obsidian and CCS. Archaeological assemblages attributed to the Gypsum complex have been radiocarbon dated to roughly 4000 to 1800 B.P. The Gypsum complex is characterized by population increases and broadening economic activities. While hunting continued to be an important subsistence focus, the processing of plant foods took on greater importance. It is suggested that because of these new adaptive mechanisms, the increase in aridity during the Late Gypsum complex (after ca. 2500 B.P.) had relatively little consequence on the distribution and increase in human populations (Warren 1984; Warren and Crabtree 1986). While open camp sites remain common, the use of rock shelters appears to have increased at this time. Base camps with extensive midden development are a prominent site type in well-watered valleys and near concentrated subsistence resources (Warren and Crabtree 1986). Additionally, evidence of potential ritualistic behavior during this time exists through the presence of rock art, quartz crystals, and paint pigments (Sutton et al. 2007). Rock art motifs suggest that bighorn sheep hunting was important during the Gypsum complex (Grant et al. 1968). The faunal remains of bighorn sheep and deer, rabbits and hares, rodents, and reptiles are reported from Gypsum complex sites in the California desert (Hall and Basgall 1994). The archaeological record suggests there was a major population increase within the California desert ca. 3000 to 2300 B.P. (Gilreath and Hildebrandt 1991; Sutton 1988). A shift in subsistence orientation and mobility near the end of the Gypsum complex is suggested, with increased emphasis on the hunting of smaller mammals, possibly coinciding with the introduction of bow and arrow technology (Basgall et al. 1986; Sutton 1996). 3.1.9 The Rose Spring Complex (1800 to 900 B.P.) The Rose Spring complex is characterized by small projectile points, including Eastgate and Rose Spring types. These smaller projectile point types appear to mark the introduction of a bow and arrow technology 360 Cultural Resources Assessment for the Shadow Ridge Project, Tentative Tract Map (TTM) 28818-1 December 2023 Page 11 CULTURAL PERSPECTIVE and the decline of the atlatl and spear (Sutton 1996). Flaked stone knives, drills, bone awls, pipes, various milling implements, and marine shell ornaments are also characteristic of the Rose Spring complex, as is the prevalent use of obsidian. Sutton (1996) notes that Rose Spring complex sites are common in the California desert and are often found near springs, washes, and lakeshores. Subsistence practices during the Rose Spring complex appear to have shifted to the exploitation of medium and small game, including rabbits and rodents, with a decreased emphasis on large game. At the Rose Spring archaeological site, numerous bedrock milling features, including mortar cups and slicks, are associated with rich midden deposits, indicating that the milling of plant foods had bec ome an important activity. In addition, evidence of permanent living structures is found during this time (Sutton et al. 2007). Warren (1984) asserts that the Rose Spring complex was marked by strong regional cultural developments especially in the Southern California desert regions, which were heavily influenced by technology and style originating from the lower Colorado River area. Warren (1984) divided the Rose Spring (Saratoga Springs) into several regionally distinct cultural developments deduced from pottery types and projectile point styles (Warren 1984). Cultural change derived from influences from lower Colorado River groups is evidenced by the introduction of Buff and Brown Ware pottery and Cottonwood and Desert Side-notched projectile points. The initial date for this influence remains unknown; however, it does appear that by 1200 to 1000 B.P., inland desert regions were heavily influenced by lower Colorado River peoples. This influence apparently continued well after the Rose Spring period (Warren 1984). 3.1.10 The Late Prehistoric Period (900 B.P. to Contact) The majority of sites in the Colorado Desert date to the Late Prehistoric Period. Late Prehistoric Period sites contain a significantly different cultural assemblage than that seen in the preceding archaeological complexes. Characteristic artifacts of the Late Prehistoric period include Desert-series projectile points (Desert Side-notched and Cottonwood Triangular), Brownware and Buffware ceramics, incised stones, and shell beads (Warren and Crabtree 1986). Milling implements (manos, milling slabs, mortars and pestles) are generally found in higher frequency in association with this period along with the increased use of CCS material. Evidence of large occupation sites, representing semi-permanent and permanent villages, characterizes Late Prehistoric settlement patterns. The Late Prehistoric period marks an era of increased linguistic complexity within the California desert. The northern part of the Salton Trough (Salton Sea and Coachella Valley) was occupied by ancestors of the Takic-speaking Cahuilla, who also occupied the adjacent Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains. (Schaefer and Laylander 2007). Regional cultural developments established during the preceding Rose Spring complex continued with some modifications. In the Colorado Desert and southeastern Mojave Desert, Brown and Buff Ware pottery first appears on the lower Colorado River at about 1200 B.P., and spreads across the California deserts by about 1100 B.P. (Warren 1984). Associated with the diffusion of this pottery were Desert Side-notched and Cottonwood Triangular projectile points dating to about 850 to 800 B.P., suggesting a continued spread of influence from Southwestern and Colorado River groups. The presence of Lake Cahuilla, a large freshwater lake, which last occupied the Salton Basin of the Colorado Desert Region during the Late Prehistoric period, was a likely catalyst in the spread of cultural traditions and technological advances throughout the California desert region. Large multi-seasonal residential bases were occupied along the Lake Cahuilla shorelines when it was present within the Coachella Valley. These sites contain abundant fish and waterfowl bone, as well as shell form freshwater shellfish. Faunal remains demonstrate the exploitation of both lowland and upland resources and floral remains indicate use of the sites across all four seasons. These large lakeshore sites were likely occupied during various stands of Lake Cahuilla between A.D. 1,200 and 1,680. The presence and desiccation of the lake is also marked by various episodes of fish trap construction. Groupings of fish trap rock alignments are found along Lake Cahuilla shorelines to the west and northwest of the present-day Salton Sea (Wilke 1978; Warren 1984). 361 Cultural Resources Assessment for the Shadow Ridge Project, Tentative Tract Map (TTM) 28818-1 December 2023 Page 12 CULTURAL PERSPECTIVE 3.2 Ethnographic Setting The project area is located in the Colorado Desert, in an area that was occupied by the Cahuilla . The Cahuilla territory included an area of over 2,400 square miles bound to the north by the San Bernadino Mountains, to the east by the Orocopia Mountains, to the west by the Santa Ana River, the San Jacinto plain, and the eastern slopes of the Palomar Mountains, and to the south by the Chocolate Mountains and Borrego Springs. Other groups reportedly also intermittently used or traveled to the area. Territories and resources were often shared, and neighboring tribes had regular interaction. The diversity of the terrain and climate of the area provided the Cahuilla with a wide variety of food resources, and they are known to have utilized more than 500 native and nonnative plants (Bean and Saubel 1972). Staple foods included acorns, mesquite pods, pinyon nuts, and various types of cacti, as well as seeds, fruits and berries, tubers, roots and greens. Agriculture was also practiced to some extent and crops such as corn, beans, squash , and melons were cultivated at some permanent villages. Rabbits and other small mammals provided meat, and fish, migratory birds, and marshland plants were exploited during high stands of Lake Cahuilla. Structures ranged from small brush shelters to more substantial dome-shaped and rectangular buildings. Permanent villages were situated near reliable water sources such as canyons which contained springs, and along the Whitewater River (Bean 1978). The Cahuilla also dug walk-in wells on alluvial fans (Bean 1972). During the 1770’s, at the time of initial contact with Europeans, the Cahuilla are reported to have numbered around 6,000, though some Cahuilla report the number was closer to 15,000. The Cahuilla largely maintained political, economic, and religious autonomy until 1877 when the U.S. government established Indian reservations in the region and missionaries came to the area. During this period many traditional cultural practices were prohibited. Today there are nine Cahuilla nations in southern California, with approximately 3,000 enrolled members. The nine Cahuilla nations include the Augustine Band of Cahuilla, Torres Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians, Cabazon Band of Mission Indians, Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians, Morongo Band of Mission Indians, Cahuilla Band of Mission Indians, Ramona Band of Cahuilla Indians, Santa Rosa Band of Mission Indians and Los Coyotes Band of Cahuilla Indians. 3.3 Historical Setting During early historic periods, the Coachella and Imperial Valley region remained relatively unknown to Euro-Americans (Wilke 1978). In 1823 to 1825, a series of expeditions to the area were led by Jose Romero, Jose Maria Estudillo, and Romualdo Pacheco in search of a travel route to Yuma (Johnston 1987). Some of the earliest detailed documentation of the area comes from the travel logs of geologis t William Blake and his party. Blake was tasked by the United States Congress to lead the Pacific Railroad Survey of the Far West from 1853 to 1856. Observations of the expedition were compiled and published as a series of government reports. The 1856 Southern California Volume includes detailed observations of desert geology, water sources, and flora, as well as documentation of the party’s interactions with local indigenous groups, including the Cahuilla. By the 1860’s several travel routes had been established, most of which followed existing Native trails. These routes included the Cocomaricopa Trail, which became known as the Bradshaw Trail (Gunther 1984; Ross 1992). The Bradshaw Trail served as the main transportation corridor between coastal southern California and the Colorado River until the completion of the Southern Pacific Railroad in 1877. Euro-American settlement in the Coachella valley began with the completion of the railroad and the establishment of railroad stations. Further booms to settlement came as land was opened for claims under the Homestead Act of 1862 which allowed for anyone above the age of 21 to claim up to 160 acres. The Act was open to 30 states, including California, between 1863 and 1976. For a homesteader to receive a land patent, the individual had to demonstrate actively working to make improvements to the property for 5 years; for veterans, this process only took 3 years. After the establishment period, a land 362 Cultural Resources Assessment for the Shadow Ridge Project, Tentative Tract Map (TTM) 28818-1 December 2023 Page 13 CULTURAL PERSPECTIVE patent was granted to the homesteader. Desert homesteading increased during the 1920s when returned World War I veterans, particularly those who were suffering from tuberculosis and the effects of mustard gas exposure, came to the desert seeking the therapeutic benefits of a warm, dry climate. The popularity of desert homesteading again increased following World War II and into the mid-century, as urban and suburban dwellers of the more populated areas of southern California sought recreational activities a nd weekend getaways in the desert. The Small Tract Act of 1938 was a desert homestead program in which 5 acres of land could be purchased for $10 per acre and permitted for recreational residence purposes. By 1955, approximately 25,000 5-acre homestead permits had been issued in the rural desert areas. Agriculture was established as a dominant economic activity in Palm Desert and the wider Coachella Valley area due to the development of underground water sources including artisanal wells. In the early 1900’s the date palm was introduced to the Coachella Valley and became the primary agricultural crop. During this period, Palm Desert was known as Palm Village. Beginning in the 1930’s a few homes were built and lots were sold in the area. In 1943, General Patton established an Army maintenance camp and motor pool on Portola Avenue at the location that would eventually become the El Paseo shopping district (Conrad 2022). Residential development connected to the Army maintenance camp began in the early 1940’s, and in 1948 the Palm Desert Corporation began to further develop real estate in the area. The city changed its name to Palm Desert in 1951, and following additional population growth during the post- war period, the community was incorporated as the City of Palm Desert in 1973. 363 Cultural Resources Assessment for the Shadow Ridge Project, Tentative Tract Map (TTM) 28818-1 December 2023 Page 14 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK 4 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK The project requires review and approval from the City of Palm Desert and is subject to the requirements of CEQA. The CEQA Statute & Guidelines (Association of Environmental Professionals 2021) direct lead agencies to determine whether a project will have a significant impact on historical resources. Under CEQA, a cultural resource is considered “historically significant” is a “historical resource” if it is included in a local register of historical resources, listed in or determined eligible for listing on the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR), or meets the requirements for listing on the CRHR under any one of the criteria of historical significance (see Section 4.2). Compliance with CEQA’s cultural resource provisions typically involves several steps. Archival research and field surveys are conducted, and identified cultural resources are inventoried and evaluated in prescribed ways. A prehistoric and historical archaeological site, standing structure, building, or object deemed by the lead agency to be a historical resource must be considered in project planning and development. A project with an impact that may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource is a project that may have a significant impact on the environment. The lead agency is responsible for identifying potentially feasible measures to avoid, minimize, or mitigate significant impacts in the significance of historical resources. 4.1 California Environment Quality Act The CEQA Statute & Guidelines include procedures for identifying, analyzing, and disclosing potential adverse impacts to historical resources, which include all resources listed in or formal ly determined eligible for the CRHR, or local registers. CEQA further defines a “historical resource” as a resource that meets any of the following criteria of historical significance: ◼ A resource listed, or determined to be eligible by the State Historical Resources Commission for listing, in the CRHR (Public Resources Code [PRC] Section 5024.1, Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations (CCR) Section 4850 et seq.) ◼ A resource included in a local register of historical resources, as defined in PRC Section 5020.1(k), public agencies must treat any such resource as significant unless the preponderance of evidence demonstrates that it is not historically or culturally significant. ◼ A resource identified as significant (i.e., rated 1-5) in a historical resource survey meeting the requirements of PRC Section 5024.1(g) (California Department of Parks and Recreation [DPR] 523 Form), unless the preponderance of evidence demonstrates that it is not historically or culturally significant. ◼ Any object, building, structure, site, area, place, record, or manuscript that a lead agency determines to be historically significant or significant in the architectural, engineering, scientific, economic, agricultural, educational, social, political, military, or cultural annals of California, provided the determination is supported by substantial evidence in light of the whole record. Generally, a resource is considered “historically significant” if it meets the criteria for listing on the CRHR (PRC Section 5024.1, Title 14 CCR Section 4852), as outlined below. 4.2 California Register of Historical Resources Criteria of Evaluation Under CEQA, a resource may be considered “historically significant” if it meets one or more of the following criteria: 1. It is associated with events or patterns of events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of local or regional history, or the cultural heritage of California; or 364 Cultural Resources Assessment for the Shadow Ridge Project, Tentative Tract Map (TTM) 28818-1 December 2023 Page 15 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK 2. It is associated with the lives of persons important in our past; or 3. It embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of a master, or possesses high artistic values; or 4. It has yielded, or has the potential to yield, information important in prehistory or history. The fact that a resource is not listed, or determined eligible for listing , in the CRHR, not included in a local register of historical resources (pursuant to PRC Section 5020.1(k)), or identified in an historical resources survey (meeting the criteria in PRC Section 5024.1(g)) does not preclude a lead agency from determining that the resource may be a historical resource as defined in PRC Section 5020.1(j) or 5024.1 4.3 Regulations Concerning Discovery of Human Remains Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5‐7055 California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5‐7055 requires that, in the event of discovery or recognition of any human remains in any location other than a dedicated cemetery, there shall be no further excavation or disturbance of the site or any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent remains until the coroner of the county in which the human remains are discovered has determined that the remains are not subject to the provisions of Section 27491 of the Government Code or any other related provisions of law concerning investigation of the circumstances, manner and cause of any death, and the recommendations concerning the treatment and disposition of the human remains have been made to the person responsible for the excavation, or to his or her authorized representative, in the manner provided in PRC Section 5097.98. The coroner shall make his or her determination within two working days from the time the person responsible for the excavation, or his or her authorized representative, notifies the coroner of the discovery or recognition of the human remains. If the coroner determines that the remains are not subject to his or her authority and if the coroner recognizes the human remains to be those of a Native American or has reason to believe that they are those of a Native American, they should contact the NAHC by telephone within 24 hours. California Public Resources Code Section 5097.98 This code mandates that the lead agency adhere to the following regulations when a project results in the identification or disturbance of Native American human remains: a) Whenever the Native American Heritage Commission receives notification of a discovery of Native American human remains from a county coroner pursuant to subdivision (c) of Section 7050.5 of the Health and Safety Code, it shall immediately notify those persons it believes to be most likely descended from the deceased Native American. The descendants may, with the permission of the owner of the land or his or her authorized representative, inspect the site of the discovery of the Native American remains and may recommend to the owner or the person responsible for the excavation work means for treating or disposing of, with appropriate dignity, the human remains and any associated grave goods. The descendants shall complete their inspection and make their recommendation within 24 hours of their notification by the commission. The recommendation may include the scientific removal and nondestructive analysis of human remains and items associated with Native American burials. b) Whenever the Native American Heritage Commission is unable to identify a descendent, or the descendent identified fails to make a recommendation, or the landowner or his or her authorized representative rejects the recommendation of the descendent, and the mediation provided for in subdivision (k) of Section 5097.94 fails to provide measures acceptable to the landowner, the landowner or his or her authorized representative shall reinter the human remains and items associated with Native 365 Cultural Resources Assessment for the Shadow Ridge Project, Tentative Tract Map (TTM) 28818-1 December 2023 Page 16 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK American burials with appropriate dignity on the property, in a location not subject to further subsurface disturbance. c) Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 5097.9, the provisions of this section, including those actions taken by the landowner or his or her authorized representative to implement this section, and any action taken to implement an agreement developed pursuant to subdivision (l) of Section 5097.94, shall be exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act [Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000)]. d) Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 30244, the provisions of this section, including those actions taken by the landowner or his or her authorized representative to implement this section, and any action taken to implement an agreement developed pursuant to subdivision (1) of Section 5097.94, shall be exempt from the requirements of the California Coastal Act of 1976 [Division 20 (commencing with Section 30000)]. 4.4 Senate Bill 18 Senate Bill 18 requires cities and counties to notify and consult with California Native American Tribes about proposed local land use planning decisions for the purpose of protecting Tribal cultural resources. Senate Bill 18 stipulates that, as of March 2005, cities and counties must send any proposals for revisions or amendments to general plans and specific plans to those California Native American Tribes that are on the NAHC’s contact list and have traditional lands located within the city or county’s j urisdiction. Cities and counties must also conduct consultations with these tribes prior to adopting or amending their general plans or specific plans or designating land as open space. 4.5 Assembly Bill 52 Assembly Bill 52 was enacted to guarantee that Tribal cultural resources are protected to the largest extent possible throughout the development process. Tribal cultural resources are defined by PRC Section 21074 as follows: (1) Sites, features, places, cultural landscapes, sacred places, and objects with cultural value to a California Native American tribe that are either of the following: (A) Included or determined to be eligible for inclusion in the California Register of Historical Resources. (B) Included in a local register of historical resources as defined in subdivision (k) of Section 5020.1. (2) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Section 5024.1 for the purposes of this paragraph, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe. (3) A cultural landscape that meets the criteria of subdivision (a) is a tribal cultural resource to the extent that the landscape is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape. (4) A historical resource described in Section 21084.1, a unique archaeological resource as defined in subdivision (g) of Section 21083.2, or a “nonunique archaeological resource” as defined in subdivision (h) of Section 21083.2 may also be a tribal cultural resource if it conforms with the criteria of subdivision (a). If Tribal cultural resources are identified within a project area, impacts must be avoided or mitigated to the extent feasible. Assembly Bill 52 protects these resources by requiring that lead agencies seek Tribal consultation prior to the release of any CEQA documentation. Lead agencies must notify Tribes 366 Cultural Resources Assessment for the Shadow Ridge Project, Tentative Tract Map (TTM) 28818-1 December 2023 Page 17 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK traditionally and culturally affiliated with a potential project area within 14 days of a development application being complete. Upon this initial notification, tribes would confirm consultation within 30 days of notification if consultation is deemed necessary. 367 Cultural Resources Assessment for the Shadow Ridge Project, Tentative Tract Map (TTM) 28818-1 December 2023 Page 18 METHODS 5 METHODS The study was conducted in accordance with the California Office of Historic Preservation (OHP) Archaeological Resource Management Reports Guidelines (California OHP 1990), the Guidelines For Archaeological Research Designs (California OHP 1991), and The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and Guidelines for Archeology and Historic Preservation [48 Federal Register 44716-44740] (NPS 1983). 5.1 Literature and Records Search A literature and records search was requested from the Eastern Information Center (EIC) of the California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS) on 12 October 2023. The results of the records search were received on 16 November 2023 and are summarized in Section 6. Additionally, maps and aerial imagery were reviewed to determine the historic land uses in the study area. Available early map sources included General Land Office (GLO) survey plat maps for T4S R6E dating to 1856, 1915 and 1944 (glorecords.blm.gov, accessed 08 December 2023). In 1856, a southeast to northwest trending “Indian Trail” is depicted approximately 2.5 miles northeast of the project site, and in 1944 a reservoir is located less than one mile northwest of the project site. No structures, roads, or other features of historical interest are shown within or in close proximity to the project location on the GLO plat maps. USGS topographic quadrangle maps dating from 1944 to 1988, and aerial imagery dating from 1959, 1972, 1975, 1977, and the 1980’s through 2000’s were reviewed (earthexplorer.usgs.gov and neteronline.com, accessed 08 December 2023). The Union Pacific Railroad and the US 99 highway (later bypassed by the I-10) are depicted by 1944 approximately 0.5-miles east of the project site. Several date farms and residences were also present by 1944 approximately one-mile west and southwest of the project location. By 1959, many small tract homesteads were constructed in the eastern quadrants of Section 32, all of which are located east of, and outside of the project site. In 1972, a north to south- aligned tree windbreak, presumably salt cedar (tamarisk), is within Section 32, immediately east of the project site, on the western edge of the homestead tracts; these trees are visible in aerial imagery through 1996. By 1973 a golf course and trailer park are constructed a short distance south of the project area on Section 33. Major paved roads including Monterey Avenue, Frank Sinatra Drive, and Gerald Ford Drive are present by 1996. By 2002, most of Section 32, which includes the project site, is visibly developed with the Marriot Shadow Ridge Resort. The golf course and other infrastructure immediately surrounds the site. The project site itself appears to have been cleared of native vegetation and potentially graded and contoured at the time of the golf course and resort construction sometime after 1998. 5.2 Sacred Lands File Search and Native American Outreach Mojave Archaeological Consulting contacted the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) on 12 October 2023, requesting a review of their Sacred Lands Files (SLF) to determine if any known Native American cultural properties (e.g., cultural resources, traditional use or gathering areas, places of religious or sacred activity) are present within or adjacent to the project site. The NAHC responded on 30 November 2023, stating the SLF search results were negative but also suggested contacting Native American tribes who may have knowledge of cultural resources in the area. Outreach letters were sent to nearby Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians, the Augustine Band of Cahuilla Indians, and the Torres - Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians. The Augustine Band of Cahuilla Indians responded that they are unaware of any specific cultural resources that may be affected by the proposed proje ct, but requested their office be contacted immediately should any cultural resources be discovered during the development of the project. The Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians (ACBCI) responded that the project area is not located within the boundaries of the ACBCI Reservation, however, it is within the Tribe’s Traditional Use Area. They stated that a records check of the ACBCI registry indicated the project site has not been 368 Cultural Resources Assessment for the Shadow Ridge Project, Tentative Tract Map (TTM) 28818-1 December 2023 Page 19 METHODS surveyed for cultural resources. The ACBCI THPO requested a cultural resources inventory of the project site by a qualified archaeologist prior to any development activities in th e area, and also requests a copy of the records search with associated survey reports and site records from the information center and copies of any cultural resource documentation (report and site records) generated in connection with the project. ACBCI also responded by email to an invitation to participate in fieldwork to survey the property. A sample outreach letter and copies of Tribal response letters received to date are provided in Appendix A. Compliance with Tribal notification and consultation under Assembly Bill 52 is the responsibility of the Lead Agency (City of Palm Desert) under CEQA and the results of the NAHC SLF search and Native American contact list are also included in Appendix A to assist with government-to-government consultation requirements under Assembly Bill 52. 5.3 Field Methods With the participation of Claritsa Duarte, Cultural Resources Analyst representing the ACBCI Tribal Historic Preservation Office, Mojave Archaeological Consulting’s Principal Investigator Michelle Hart performed an intensive pedestrian field survey of the project area on 20 November 2023. The survey began at the western edge of the project site and was completed from southwest to northeast along parallel linear transects spaced 15-meters apart. The entirety of the 20.69-acre project site was systematically surveyed in this manner. A handheld Global Positioning System (GPS) receiver, digital topographic maps, and aerial imagery were used to ensure intensive coverage. To assess the potential for buried cultural deposits, soil profiles were examined along road cuts, rodent burrows, previously excavated and disturbed areas, and other natural and artificial exposures. No cultural resource, either prehistoric or historic, were identified during the survey. Ground surface visibility was generally very good (approximately 80-to-90%) throughout the project area, dependent on the density of vegetation cover and level of recent ground disturbance. 369 Cultural Resources Assessment for the Shadow Ridge Project, Tentative Tract Map (TTM) 28818-1 December 2023 Page 20 RESULTS 6 RESULTS 6.1 Previous Investigations A CHRIS literature and records search was performed by the EIC, which included a 0.5-mile-wide buffer (study area). The results of the search were received on 14 November 2023. A total of seven cultural resource surveys have been previously conducted within the 0.5-mile study area (Tables 6.1-1 and 6.1- 2). None of these previous investigations covered any portion of the project area, which has not been previously surveyed. Table 6.1-1: Previous Surveys within 0.5-Mile of the Project Area Number Year Author(s) Title RI-01122 1981 Christopher E. Drover Environmental Impact Evaluation: Archaeological Assessment of the Proposed Extensions of the Monterey and 34th Avenues Near Thousand Palms, California RI-07440 2007 Sanka, M. Jennifer Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment Palm Desert Sheriff Station, Project FM08250003764, Palm Desert, Riverside County, California RI-09279 2015 Bai Tang, Ben Kerridge, Daniel Ballester, and Nina Gallardo Phase I Historical/Archaeological Resources Survey: Santa Rosa Golf Club and Catavina Property, City of Palm Desert, Riverside County, California RI-09889 2016 Bai Tang and Michael Hogan Phase I Historical/Archaeological Resources Survey Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 694-300-001, -002, -005, -014, -015, and 694-310- 002, -003, -006, -007, City of Palm Desert, Riverside County, California RI-10275 2017 Brian F. Smith A Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for the Portola Avenue and Frank Sinatra Drive Property, City of Palm Desert, Riverside County, California RI-10820 2018 L. Porras and B. Vargas Phase I Cultural Study for the Coachella Valley Water District Non- Potable Connections Project No. 17-04981 RI-11011 2018 Bai Tang and Michael Hogan Historical/Archaeological Resources Survey Report, Tower Market Project, CUP 18804/TPM 37486, City of Rancho Mirage, Riverside County, California 6.2 Previously Identified Resources No cultural resources have been previously documented within the project area or the 0.5-mile study area. 6.3 Newly Recorded Resources – Intensive Pedestrian Inventory Results An intensive pedestrian inventory of the project area was completed 20 November 2023 with n egative results. No cultural resources, either prehistoric or historic, were identified within the project area. 7 CONCLUSION AND MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS Mojave Archaeological Consulting, LLC has prepared this cultural resources assessment on behalf of Tom Dodson and Associates for the construction of the Shadow Ridge Project, Tentative Tract Map (TTM) 28818-1, in the City of Palm Desert, Riverside County, California. The site consists of 370 Cultural Resources Assessment for the Shadow Ridge Project, Tentative Tract Map (TTM) 28818-1 December 2023 Page 21 CONCLUSION AND MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS approximately 20.69-acres (APN’s 694-290-010, 694-290-011, 694-320-010, 694-320-011), on Shadow Ridge Road, within Marriott’s 306-acre Shadow Ridge property, located at the southeast corner of Monterey Avenue and Gerald Ford Drive. In accordance with CEQA, to determine the potential for the proposed project to impact historical/archaeological resources eligible for or listed on the CRHR, Mojave Archaeological Consulting’s assessment included a records search and literature review, an SLF search with the NAHC, and an intensive archaeological survey of the 20.69-acre project area. The literature and records search performed by the EIC, including a 0.5-mile-wide buffer, indicated that no cultural resources, either prehistoric or historic, have been previously documented within the 0.5-mile study area. The SLF search with the NAHC was completed with negative results. Mojave Archaeological Consulting conducted an intensive pedestrian survey on 20 November 2023 with negative results. No cultural resources were identified within the project area during the survey. The geological context of the project setting and previous disturbance of the site suggests that intact and significant buried archaeological deposits are unlikely. Additionally, all data from this investigation indicate that there was no historical use of the property. Considering these findings, Mojave Archaeological Consulting recommends to the City of Palm Desert that the proposed project will have no impact on historical or archaeological resources. No further cultural resources work or monitoring measures are recommended necessary for the proposed project activities. However, in the event that potentially significant archaeological materials are encountered during construction, all work must be halted in the vicinity of the discovery until a qualified archaeologist c an assess the significance and integrity of the find. If intact and significant archaeological remains are encountered, the impacts of the project should be mitigated appropriately. Any such discoveries, and subsequent evaluation and treatment, should be documented in a cultural resource s report, which would be submitted to the EIC for archival purposes. Additionally, Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5, CEQA Statute & Guidelines Section 15064.5(e), and PRC Section 5097.98 mandate the process to be followed in the event of a discovery of human remains. Finally, if the project area is expanded to include areas not covered by this survey or other recent cultural resource investigations in the study area, additional cultural resource investigat ions may be required. 371 Cultural Resources Assessment for the Shadow Ridge Project, Tentative Tract Map (TTM) 28818-1 December 2023 Page 22 REFERENCES 8 REFERENCES Ainsworth, Ed 1955 Five Acres of Heaven: Story of the Great American Desert. Homer H. Boelter Lithography, Los Angeles, California. Altschul, Jeffrey H., William C. Johnson, and Matthew A. Sterner 1989 The Deep Creek Site (CA-SBR-176): A Late Prehistoric Base Camp in the Mojave River Forks Region, San Bernardino County, California. Statistical Research Technical Series 22. Coyote Press, Salinas, California. Anderson, R. Scott 2001 The Paleoenvironment of Diamond and Domenigoni Valleys. Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, Eastside Reservoir Project Final Report of Archaeological Investigations, Vol. V, Susan K. Goldberg, general editor, pp. 353–396. Applied EarthWorks, Inc., Hemet, California. Arnold, J.E., A.Q. Duffield, R.S. Greenwood, R.P. Hampson, and T.M. Van Bueren with contributions by B.E. Lander 1987 Archaeological Resources of the Seven Oaks Dam Project, Upper Santa Ana River Locality. On file with the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, Los Angeles District, Los Angeles, California. Association of Environmental Professionals 2021 2021 CEQA Statute & Guidelines. https://www.califaep.org/docs/CEQA_Handbook_2021.pdf. Basgall, M.E., K.R. McGuire, and A.J. Gilreath 1986 Archaeological Test Excavations at CA-INY-30; A Multi-Component Prehistoric Site Near Lone Pine, Inyo County, California. On file at the California Department of Transportation, Sacramento. Basgall, Mark E., and D.L. True 1985 Crowder Canyon Archaeological Investigations, San Bernardino County, Volumes 1 and 2, CA-SBr-421 and CA-SBr-713. Prepared by Far West Anthropological Research Group, Inc. Bean, Lowell J. 1978 . Cahuilla. In California, edited by Robert F. Heizer, pp. 575–587. Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 8, William Sturdevant, general editor. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. Bean, Lowell J., and Sylvia B. Vane (editors) 1978 Persistence and Power: A Study of Native American Peoples in the Sonoran Desert and the Devers-Palo Verde High Voltage Transmission Line, by Lowell John Bean, Henry F. Dobyns, M. Kay Martin, Richard W. Stoffle, Sylvia Brakke Vane, and David M. White. Cultural Systems Research, Inc., Menlo Park, California. Bettinger, Robert L., and Martin A. Baumhoff 372 Cultural Resources Assessment for the Shadow Ridge Project, Tentative Tract Map (TTM) 28818-1 December 2023 Page 23 REFERENCES 1982 The Numic Spread: Great Basin Cultures in Competition. American Antiquity 47(3):485–503. California Office of Historic Preservation (California OHP) 1990 Archaeological Resource Management Reports Guidelines. 1991 Guidelines For Archaeological Research Designs. 1995 Instructions for Recording Historical Resources. Cambell, Elizabeth 1931 An Archaeological Survey of the Twenty-Nine Palms Region. Southwest Museum Papers no. 7. Southwest Museum, Los Angeles. Campbell, E.W.C., W.H. Campbell, E. Antevs, C.A. Amsden, J.A. Barbieri, and F.D. Bode 1937 The Archaeology of Pleistocene Lake Mojave . Southwest Museum Papers 11. Los Angeles, California. Conrad, Tracy 2022 Palm Desert’s storied origins now collected, curated by namesake historical society. The Desert Sun. https://www.desertsun.com/story/life/entertainment/people/2020/06/28/palm- deserts-history-which-began-henderson-brothers-now-collected-and- curated/3271791001/ Davis, E.L. 1970 Archaeology of the North Basin of Panamint Valley, Inyo County, California. Nevada State Museum Anthropological Papers 15:83–141, Carson City. Gilreath, A.J., and W.R. Hildebrandt 1991 National Register of Historic Places Registration Form: Sugarloaf Archaeological District, United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Washington, D.C. Grant, Campbell, James W. Baird, and J. Kenneth Pringle 1968 Rock drawings of the Coso Range, Inyo County, California. Maturango Museum Publication 4. China Lake, California. Grayson, Donald K. 2011 The Great Basin: A Natural Prehistory University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles. Hall, Matt C., and M.E. Basgall 1994 Lessons to Learn from Newberry/Gypsum Period Archaeology of the Mojave Desert. In Kelso Conference Papers 1987-1992: A Collection of Papers and Abstracts from the First Five Kelso Conferences on the Prehistory of the Mojave Desert, edited by G.D. Everson and J. S. Schneider, pp. 84–94. Museum of Anthropology Occasional Papers in Anthropology No. 4, California State University, Bakersfield. Harrington, J.P. 1986 The Papers of John Peabody Harrington in the Smithsonian Institution, 1907–1957, Vol. 3: Native American History, Language, and Culture of Southern California/Basin. Krause International Publications, White Plains, New York. 373 Cultural Resources Assessment for the Shadow Ridge Project, Tentative Tract Map (TTM) 28818-1 December 2023 Page 24 REFERENCES Kimball, Monique E. 2014 Guide to Historic Artifacts. Copy on file with the author. Kroeber, A.L. 1925 Handbook of the Indians of California. Bulletin 78 of the Bureau of American Ethnology of the Smithsonian Institution, Government Printing Office, Washington. D.C. Madsen, David B and David Rhode 1994 Across the West. Human Population Movement and the Expansion of the Numa. David. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City. National Park Service (NPS) 1983 The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and Guidelines for Archeology and Historic Preservation (48 Federal Register 44716-44740). Norris, Robert M. and Webb, Robert W. 1976 Geology of California. Originally published by Wiley, New York. Pigniolo, Andrew R. 2004 Points, Patterns, and People: Distribution of the Desert Side-Notched Point in San Diego County. Proceedings of the Society for California Archaeology 14:27–39. Ramon, Dorothy, and Eric Elliott 2000 Wayta' Yawa'. Morongo Indian Reservation, Banning, California: Malki Museum Press. Rogers, M.J. 1939 Early Lithic Industries of the Lower Basin of the Colorado River and Adjacent Desert Areas. San Diego Museum of Man Papers 3. San Diego, California. Ross, Delmer G. 1992 Gold Road to La Paz: An Interpretive Guide to the Bradshaw Trail. Tales of the Mojave Road Publishing Company, Essex, California. Sawyer, J.O. 1994 Draft Series Descriptions of California Vegetation. California Native Plant Society, Sacramento. Schaefer, Jerry 1994 The Challenge of Archaeological Research in the Colorado Desert Region: Recent Approaches and Discoveries. Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology 16(1): 60-80. Smith, Gerald 1963 Archaeological Survey of the Mojave River Area and Adjacent Regions . San Bernardino County Museum Association, San Bernardino, California. Stringfellow, Kim 2009 Jackrabbit Homestead: Tracing the Small Tract Act in the Southern California Landscape, 1938-2008. University of Chicago Press, and The Center for American Places at Columbia College, Chicago. 374 Cultural Resources Assessment for the Shadow Ridge Project, Tentative Tract Map (TTM) 28818-1 December 2023 Page 25 REFERENCES Strong, William Duncan 1929 Aboriginal Society in Southern California. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology 26(1):1–358. Berkeley. Sutton, Mark Q. 1981 Archaeology of the Antelope Valley, Western Mojave Desert, California. 1988 An Introduction to the Archaeology of the Western Mojave Desert, California. Coyote Press Archives of California Prehistory 14. Coyote Press, Salinas, California. 1996 The Current Status of Archaeological Research in the Mojave Desert. Journal of California and Great Basin Archaeology 18(2):221–257. Sutton, Mark Q., M.E. Basgall, J.K. Gardner, and M.W. Allen 2007 Advances in Understanding the Mojave Desert Prehistory. In California Prehistory Colonization, Culture and Complexity, edited by T. L. Jones and K. A. Klar, pp. 229–245. Altamira Press, Lanham, Maryland. Sutton, Mark Q., and David D. Earle 2017 The Desert Serrano of the Mojave River. Pacific Coast Archaeological Society Quarterly 53(2&3):1-61. Sutton, Mark Q., Joan S. Schneider, and Robert M. Yohe 1993 The Siphon Site (CA-SBR-6580): A Millingstone Horizon Site in Summit Valley, California. Quarterly of the San Bernardino County Museum Association 40(3). Thomas, Tiffany Ann 2011 A Landscape Approach to Late Prehistoric Settlement and Subsistence Patterns in the Mojave Sink. Master’s thesis, Department of Anthropology, University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Thompson, D.G. 1929 The Mojave Desert Region, California: A Geographic, Geologic, and Hydrologic Reconnaissance. U.S. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 578, pp. 559–568. U.S. Department of the Interior, Geological Survey. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington D.C. United States Geological Survey (USGS) 2023 Geologic maps of US states, electronic document, https://mrdata.usgs.gov/geology/state/. Van Devender, T.R., and W.G. Spaulding 1979 Development of Vegetation and Climate in the Southwestern United States. Science 204:701–710. Vasek, F.C., and M.G. Barbour 1977 Mojave Desert Scrub Vegetation. In Terrestrial Vegetation of California. Edited by Michael G. Barbour and Jack Major, pp. 835 –867. John Wiley and Sons, NY. Wallace, W.J. 375 Cultural Resources Assessment for the Shadow Ridge Project, Tentative Tract Map (TTM) 28818-1 December 2023 Page 26 REFERENCES 1955 A Suggested Chronology for Southern California Coastal Archaeology. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 11:214–230. Warren, Claude N. 1967 The San Dieguito Complex: A Review and Hypothesis. American Antiquity 32(2):168– 185. 1984 The Desert Region. In California Archaeology, edited by M. Moratto, pp. 339–430. Academic Press, Orlando, Florida. Warren, Claude N., Martha Knack, and Elizabeth von Till Warren 1980 The Archaeology and Archaeological Resources of the Amargosa –Mojave Basin Planning Units. In A Cultural Resources Overview for the Amargosa–Mojave Basin Planning Units. U.S. Bureau of Land Management, Cultural Resources Publications, Anthropology–History, Riverside, California. Warren, Claude N., and Robert H. Crabtree 1986 Prehistory of the Southwestern Area. In Great Basin, edited by Warren L. D’Azevedo, pp. 183–193. Handbook of North American Indians, Vol. 11, William C. Sturtevant, general editor. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. Wells, Stephen G., Roger Y. Anderson, Leslie D. McFadden, William J. Brown, Yehouda Enzel, and J. L. Miossec 1989 Late Quaternary Paleohydrology of the Eastern Mojave Drainage, Southern California: Quantitative Assessment of the Late Quaternary Hydrologic Cycle in Large Arid Watersheds. New Mexico Water Resources Research Institute Report 242:1–253. Wilke, Phillip J. 1978 Late Prehistoric Human Ecology at Lake Cahuilla Coachella Valley California. Contributions of the Archaeological Research Facility, Department of Anthropology, University of California Berkely. Wilke, Phillip J. and David L. Weide 1976 Background to Prehistory of the Yuha Desert Region. Ballena Press Anthropological Papers No. 5. Menlo Park, California. 376 SACRED LANDS FILE SEARCH AND TRIBAL CORRESPONDENCE 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 City of Palm Desert Shadow Ridge Project, PP 23-0023/VTTM 38866 SECTION 15183 ANALYSIS TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES APPENDIX 4 387 28532 Constellation Road  Valencia  CA 91355  (661) 702-8474  Fax (661) 702-8475 LGC Valley, Inc. Geotechnical Consulting PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT FOR THE PROPOSED SHADOW RIDGE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, TRACT 14670 CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA Dated: November 10, 2023 Project No. 223011-01 Prepared For: Toll Brothers 350 Commerce, Suite 200 Irvine, CA 92602 388 28532 Constellation Road  Valencia  CA 91355  (661) 702-8474  Fax (661) 702-8475 LGC Valley, Inc. Geotechnical Consulting November 10, 2023 Project No. 223011-01 Mr. Eric Everhart Toll Brothers 350 Commerce, Suite 200 Irvine, California 92602 Subject: Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Report for the Proposed Shadow Ridge Residential Development, Tract 146701, City of Palm Desert, California In accordance with your request, LGC Valley, Inc. (LGC) has performed a preliminary geotechnical investigation for a proposed residential development located within the Shadow Ridge Golf Resort located in the city of Palm Desert, California. The purpose of our investigation was to provide geotechnical investigation and percolation testing for a proposed residential development, evaluate the conceptual site development plan, geotechnical conditions, review geotechnical and geologic data and maps pertinent to the site, and prepare a report indicating our findings, conclusions, opinions, and recommendations for site development. This report presents the results of our subsurface investigation, and geotechnical analysis of the collected data, grading construction and other relevant geotechnical aspects of the project, and provides our conclusions, opinions including recommendations for stormwater infiltration design and recommendations with respect to site development. Based on the results of our geotechnical evaluation and review, it is our opinion that the proposed site development is feasible from a geotechnical standpoint, provided the recommendations included in this report are incorporated into the project plans and specifications, and followed during site grading and construction. LGC has reviewed the laboratory test data, procedures and results performed by Environmental Geotechnology Laboratory, Inc. (EGL), with respect to the subject site and concurs with and accepts responsibility as geotechnical engineer of record for their work (laboratory testing). If you have any questions regarding our report, please contact this office. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service. Respectfully submitted, LGC VALLEY, INC. Basil Hattar, GE 2734 Matthew Hawley, CEG 2122 Principal Engineer President BIH/MCH Distribution: (1) Addressee Via Email 389 Project No. 223011-01 Page i November 10, 2023 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose and Scope of Services ...................................................................................... 1 1.2 Site and Project Description ........................................................................................... 2 1.3 Subsurface Investigation and Laboratory Testing .......................................................... 2 2.0 GEOTECHNICAL CONDITIONS ........................................................................................ 4 2.1 Regional and Local Geology ......................................................................................... 4 2.2 Site-Specific Geology .................................................................................................... 4 2.2.1 Artificial Fill .................................................................................................... 4 2.2.2 Quaternary Alluvium (Qal) .............................................................................. 5 2.3 Geologic Structure ......................................................................................................... 5 2.4 Landslides ...................................................................................................................... 5 2.5 Groundwater .................................................................................................................. 5 2.6 Surface Water ................................................................................................................ 5 2.7 Seismicity, Faulting and Related Effects ...................................................................... 6 2.7.1 Seismicity ......................................................................................................... 6 2.7.2 Seismic Design Criteria .................................................................................... 6 2.7.3 Faulting ............................................................................................................. 7 2.7.4 Shallow Ground Rupture .................................................................................. 8 2.7.5 Liquefaction and Dry Sand Settlement ............................................................ 8 2.7.6 Seismically Induced Settlements ..................................................................... 8 2.7.7 Tsunamis and Seiches....................................................................................... 9 2.8 Settlement .................................................................................................................... 10 2.9 Slope Stability ............................................................................................................. 10 2.10 Laboratory Testing ...................................................................................................... 10 2.11 Percolation Testing ...................................................................................................... 11 3.0 CONCLUSIONS .................................................................................................................... 11 4.0 RECOMMENDATIONS ....................................................................................................... 13 4.1 Site Earthwork ............................................................................................................. 13 4.1.1 Site Preparation ............................................................................................... 15 4.1.2 Removal and Recompaction ............................................................................ 13 4.1.3 Shrinkage/Bulking .......................................................................................... 16 4.1.4 Temporary Excavation Stability ...................................................................... 16 390 TABLE OF CONTENTS (Cont’d) Section Page Project No. 223011-01 Page ii November 10, 2023 4.1.5 Fill Backfill and Compaction .......................................................................... 17 4.1.6 Trench Backfill and Compaction ..................................................................... 17 4.2 Foundations ................................................................................................................. 15 4.2.1 General ........................................................................................................... 15 4.2.2 Bearing Capacity ............................................................................................ 18 4.2.3 Post-Tension Foundations ............................................................................... 19 4.2.4 Mat Foundations ............................................................................................. 21 4.2.5 Foundation Settlement .................................................................................... 21 4.3 Lateral Earth Pressures for Retaining Walls ................................................................... 21 4.4 Preliminary Pavement Recommendations ................................................................... 22 4.5 Corrosivity to Concrete and Metal ............................................................................... 24 4.6 Nonstructural Concrete Flatwork ................................................................................. 24 4.7 Swimming Pool .......................................................................................................... 25 4.8 Control of Surface Water and Drainage Control .......................................................... 26 4.9 Construction Observation and Testing ......................................................................... 26 5.0 LIMITATIONS ...................................................................................................................... 27 391 Project No. 223011-01 Page iii November 10, 2023 LIST OF TABLES, APPENDICES AND ILLUSTRATIONS Tables Table 1 – Seismic Design Parameters (Page 7) Table 2 – Preliminary Geotechnical Parameters for Post-Tension Slab Design (Page 20) Table 3 – Lateral Earth Pressures for Retaining Walls (Page 22) Table 4 – Preliminary Pavement Design Sections (Page 22) Table 5 – Nonstructural Concrete Flatwork (Page 25) Figures Figure 1 – Site Location Map (Page 3) Figure 2 – Geotechnical Map (rear of text) Figure 3 – Retaining Wall Drainage Detail (rear of text) Figure 4 – Geotechnical Guidelines for Swimming Pool Construction (rear of text) Appendices Appendix A – References Appendix B – Test Pit Logs, Boring Logs and Percolation Test Results Appendix C – Laboratory Testing Results Appendix D – Seismically Induced Dry Sand Settlement Analysis Appendix E – General Earthwork and Grading Specifications for Rough Grading 392 Project No.223011-01 Page 1 November 10, 2023 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Purpose and Scope of Services The purpose of this investigation was to identify and evaluate the existing geologic and geotechnical conditions at the site and provide preliminary geotechnical design criteria. Recommendations for grading construction, preliminary foundation design for the proposed structures, stormwater infiltration design and other relevant aspects of the proposed development are included herein to address the identified site geotechnical conditions. This report includes the results of our site exploration, laboratory testing, and engineering evaluation, and provides our conclusions, opinions and recommendations with respect to site development. These items plus other geotechnical conditions are discussed and addressed within this document. Our scope of services for preparation of this document included:  Review of available geotechnical reports, geologic maps and other documents relevant to the site (Appendix A).  Perform a site visit to evaluate the existing conditions and mark the geotechnical boring locations.  A subsurface investigation including the excavation, sampling, and logging of seven test pits, three small-diameter exploratory borings and four percolation borings. The test pits are labeled TP-1 through TP-7, and the borings are labeled B-LGC-1 through B-LGC-3 and LGC PT-1 through LGC PT-4. Logs of the test pits and borings are presented in Appendix B, and their approximate locations are depicted on the Geotechnical Map (Figure 2). All of the excavations were sampled and logged under the supervision of a licensed geologist from our firm. The borings were excavated to evaluate the general characteristics of the subsurface conditions on the site including classification of site soils, determination of depth to groundwater, and to obtain representative soil samples.  Laboratory testing of representative soil samples obtained during our subsurface investigation (Appendix C).  Perform geotechnical analyses and evaluation of the data.  Preparation of this report presenting our findings, conclusions, opinions and recommendations with respect to the evaluated geologic and geotechnical conditions at the site. 393 Project No.223011-01 Page 2 November 10, 2023 1.2 Site and Project Description The subject site is located southeast of the intersection of Gerald Ford Drive and Monterey Avenue in the City of Palm Desert. The site is within the Shadow Ridge Resort, located on both sides of the U-shaped Shadow Ridge Drive which is an interior private drive within the resort (Figure 1, Site Location Map). Two entrances lead into the site, one off Monterey Avenue and the other off Gerald Ford Drive. Based on our review of the development plans as prepared by Wilson Mikami Corporation (WMC) the project civil engineer-of-record, the site currently consists of an elongated stretch of open land that is roughly cut into individual pads for 93 single family homes surrounded by the Shadow Ridge Golf Course. It is our understanding that the proposed development will consist of one to two-story single-family residences with small parks/open space atop buried water quality basins to account for storm water flows. Associated concrete flatwork, utilities and driveways are also a part of the plan. Future grading of the site is anticipated to consist of minor design cuts and fills to achieve finish grades. Appurtenant structures, storm water filtration systems, landscaping, and associated utilities will also be constructed to support the new development. 1.3 Subsurface Investigation and Laboratory Testing Our subsurface investigation was performed on March 30, 2022, October 3, 2023, and November 6, 2023 and consisted of seven test pits (performed in 2022), three hollow stem auger borings (B-LGC-1 through B-LGC-3) and four percolation borings (LGC PT-1 through LGC PT-4) which were recently excavated in 2023. The test pits were generally excavated to depths not exceeding five feet in depth. The geotechnical borings were excavated to depths ranging from approximately 31.5 feet to 51.5 feet below the existing grade. Percolation borings were excavated to varying depths based on the design as prepared by WMC; percolation well depths ranged from approximately 12 to 17 feet below the existing grade. The approximate locations of the explorations are shown on the Geotechnical Map (Figure 2). The site has not been evaluated by the State of California to determine whether it is within a seismic hazard area for fault rupture, liquefaction potential or the potential for seismically induced landsliding. However, based on our site investigation and review of local and regional geologic literature, the site has a very low to nil potential for any of the above seismically induced conditions. To further our study, LGC also evaluated the seismically induced dry sand settlement, consolidation potential and hydro-collapse potential of site soils along with determining the overall characteristics of site soils as outlined herein. During the subsurface investigation, representative bulk and relatively undisturbed samples were collected for laboratory testing. Laboratory testing was performed by EGLAB, Inc. (EGL). Laboratory testing was performed on representative soil samples and included moisture and density tests, maximum density and optimum moisture content, grain size distribution, Atterberg Limits, expansion, direct shear, consolidation, collapse, and corrosion testing. A summary of the test procedures and printouts of the laboratory test results are presented in Appendix C. The moisture and density test results are presented on the boring logs included in Appendix B. 394 Project No.223011-01 Page 3 November 10, 2023 Site Location Map 395 Project No.223011-01 Page 4 November 10, 2023 2.0 GEOTECHNICAL CONDITIONS 2.1 Regional and Local Geology The subject site is located in the north-central Coachella Valley of southern California. The valley is a structurally down-dropped depression caused by the interaction of nearby active faults including the San Jacinto and San Andres faults located approximately 20 miles and 4 miles from the site, respectively. Generally, the valley is filled with hundreds of feet alluvium with dense hard bedrock types far below. In the near surface, the site is composed of Holocene to Pleistocene age alluvium deposited in an alluvial valley and stream channel environment where particles are derived mainly from igneous rocks of the San Jacinto Mountains. Locally, wind-blown sand creating dunes mantle the alluvium. The site is located within the northeastern portion of the Cathedral City USGS 7.5’ Quadrangle. Based on this map, the closest mountain ranges are the San Jacinto Mountains and the Little San Bernardino Mountains and San Bernardino Mountains, located several miles to the south, northeast and northwest, respectively. 2.2 Site-Specific Geology The subject site is composed of artificial fill over Quaternary-age undifferentiated dune sand/alluvium. Both the fill and the underlying alluvium consist of layers of brown to gray-brown silty sand to the maximum explored depth of approximately 51.5 feet. Groundwater was not encountered. 2.2.1 Artificial Fill A thin layer of artificial fill that ranges from approximately 1 to 2 feet in thickness was encountered in our explorations. Based on the results of our subsurface investigation, the fill is composed primarily of light gray to light grey-brown silty sand that is dry to damp and loose to medium dense. Based on weathering, a general lack of moisture, and a generally loose nature when dry, site fill is not considered suitable for support of proposed structures. 2.2.2 Quaternary Alluvium (Qal) Quaternary alluvium or dune sand was encountered at the ground surface and beneath all fills encountered across the site. As encountered, these soils generally consisted of light grey- brown to brown, dry to moist, and medium dense to very dense silty sands to sands to the maximum explored depth of approximately 51.5 feet. 2.3 Geologic Structure The site is composed of a thin layer of artificial fill over Quaternary alluvium to considerable depth. The alluvium is interpreted as generally massive with some poorly-defined, gradational to abrupt lithologic changes between soil types. Due to the depth of site bedrock and the relatively flat nature of the site, the geologic structure of alluvium and site bedrock is not considered relevant for this study. 396 Project No.223011-01 Page 5 November 10, 2023 2.4 Landslides Based on the relatively flat nature of the site and our review of the geologic literature pertinent to the site, there are no indications of landslides close to or within the limits of the site. 2.5 Groundwater Groundwater was not encountered in our geotechnical test pits or borings. Review of data compiled by the State of California Department of Water Resources indicates that groundwater is likely between 150 and 200 feet below the ground surface. In general, groundwater levels in alluvium fluctuate with seasonal variations and local zones of perched groundwater may occur within the near-surface deposits when precipitation is high. Based on the current design of an at grade development, and that groundwater was not encountered, we do not anticipate that the site excavations will encounter groundwater during construction. 2.6 Surface Water Based on our review of local maps, sheet flow is to the east and southeast. Surface water runoff relative to project design is the purview of the project civil engineer and should be directed away from planned structures. 2.7 Seismicity, Faulting and Related Effects 2.7.1 Seismicity The main seismic parameters to be considered when discussing the potential for earthquake- induced damage are the distances to the causative faults, earthquake magnitudes, and expected ground accelerations. We have performed site-specific analysis based on these seismic parameters for the site and the onsite geologic conditions. The results of our analysis discuss in terms of the potential seismic events that could be produced by the maximum probable earthquakes. A maximum probable earthquake is the maximum earthquake likely to occur given the known tectonic framework. The San Andres Fault is located approximately 4 miles northeast of the site, based on the California Geological Survey Map (CDMG, 1974) and Google Earth Pro interactive map with distances to faults and is considered to have the most significant effect at the site. 2.7.2 Seismic Design Criteria The site seismic characteristics were evaluated per the guidelines set forth in Chapter 16, Section 1613 of the 2019 California Building Code (CBC) and ASCE 7-16. Representative site coordinates for the subject site of latitude 33.7808º N and longitude -116.3816º W were utilized in our analyses. The maximum considered earthquake (MCE) spectral response accelerations (SMS and SM1) and adjusted design spectral response acceleration parameters (SDS and SD1) for Site Class D are provided in the following Table 1. 397 Project No.223011-01 Page 6 November 10, 2023 Table 1 Seismic Design Parameters Selected Parameters from 2022 CBC, Section 1613 - Earthquake Loads Seismic Design Values Site Class per Chapter 20 of ASCE 7 D Risk-Targeted Spectral Acceleration for Short Periods (SS) 1.719g Risk-Targeted Spectral Accelerations for 1-Second Periods (S1) 0.711g Site Coefficient Fa per Table 1613.3.3(1) 1.0 Site Coefficient Fv per Table 1613.3.3(2) 1.7 Site Modified Spectral Acceleration for Short Periods (SMS) for Site Class D [Note: SMS = FaSS] 1.719g Site Modified Spectral Acceleration for 1-Second Periods (SM1) for Site Class D [Note: SM1 = FvS1] 1.209g Design Spectral Acceleration for Short Periods (SDS) for Site Class D [Note: SDS = (2/3)SMS] 1.146g Design Spectral Acceleration for 1-Second Periods (SD1) for Site Class D [Note: SD1 = (2/3)SM1] 0.806g Seismic Design Category (per Section 1613.2.5) D Section 1803.5.12 of the 2022 CBC (per Section 11.8.3 of ASCE 7) states that the maximum considered earthquake geometric mean (MCEG) Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) should be used for geotechnical evaluations. The PGAM for the site is equal to 0.823 g (USGS, 2013). A deaggregation of the PGA based on a 2,475-year average return period indicates that an earthquake magnitude of 7.49 at a distance of approximately 7.57 km (4.7 mi) from the site would contribute the most to this ground motion (USGS, 2014). 2.7.3 Faulting Based on our review of published geologic maps, the subject site is not located within an Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone (Hart and Bryant, 1997) and no active faults are mapped projecting through the subject site. The possibility of damage due to ground rupture from earthquake fault rupture is considered very low since active faults are not known to cross the site. 398 Project No.223011-01 Page 7 November 10, 2023 Secondary effects of seismic shaking resulting from large earthquakes on the major faults in the southern California region, which may affect the site, include soil liquefaction and dynamic settlement. Other secondary seismic effects include shallow ground rupture and seiches and tsunamis. In general, these secondary effects of seismic shaking are a possibility throughout the Southern California region and are dependant on the distance between the site and causative fault and the onsite geology. The major active fault that could produce these secondary effects is the San Andres Fault located within approximately four miles north of the site. Other active faults that may result in shaking to the site include the San Jacinto fault, and several other named faults that are associated with the San Andreas fault, among others. A discussion of liquefaction and these secondary effects is provided in the following sections. 2.7.4 Shallow Ground Rupture Shallow ground rupture due to active faulting is not likely to occur on site due to the distance from likely seismic events. Therefore, this phenomenon is not considered a significant hazard, although it is a possibility at any site. 2.7.5 Liquefaction and Dry Sand Settlement Liquefaction is a seismic phenomenon in which loose, saturated, granular soils behave similarly to a fluid when subject to high-intensity ground shaking. Liquefaction occurs when three general conditions exist: 1) shallow groundwater; 2) low density non-cohesive (granular) soils; and 3) high-intensity ground motion. Liquefaction is typified by a buildup of pore-water pressure in the affected soil layer to a point where a total loss of shear strength occurs, causing the soil to behave as a liquid. Studies indicate that saturated, loose to medium dense, near surface cohesionless soils exhibit the highest liquefaction potential, while dry, dense, cohesionless soils and cohesive soils exhibit low to negligible liquefaction potential. Based on our review of the site, especially with regard to depth to groundwater which is located well below 50 feet from the ground surface, liquefaction and related seismic effects are not considered a threat to the site. During a strong seismic event, seismically induced settlement can occur within loose to moderately dense, dry or saturated granular soil. Settlement caused by ground shaking is often non-uniformly distributed, which can result in differential settlement. Based on the encountered sandy soils on site that were found to be medium dense to dense in the upper 50 feet, there is a potential for dry sand settlement to occur in the dry, loose to moderately dense granular soils. 2.7.6 Seismically-Induced Settlement During a strong seismic event, seismically-induced settlement can occur within loose to moderately dense, dry or saturated granular soil. Settlement caused by ground shaking is often non-uniformly distributed, which can result in differential settlement. Based on the results of the dry sand settlement analysis, we estimate the amount of total seismically-induced settlement possible for the design site conditions is up to approximately two inches. We estimated the induced settlements based on the procedures proposed by Tokimatsu and Seed (1987). 399 Project No.223011-01 Page 8 November 10, 2023 The calculations estimated the total seismically-induced settlement. Differential settlements due to lateral heterogeneities in the soil profile would likely be only a fraction of the total, we conclude that the differential settlements would be buffered by the remedial recommendations provided herein. Based on the publication, Recommended Procedures for Implementation of DMG Special Publication 117, Guidelines for Analyzing and Mitigating Liquefaction in California, from case studies and field measurements after seismic event including the 1994 Northridge Earthquake, it can be concluded that the differential settlement at level ground sites with natural soils are expected to be small even if total settlements are large. However, for design purposes differential settlement should be assumed to be approximately one-half of the total settlement. Based on the above, the estimated differential settlement that should be considered in site development is approximately 1-inch. 2.7.7 Tsunamis and Seiches Based on the elevation of the proposed development at the site with respect to sea level and its distance from large open bodies of water, the potential of seiche and/or tsunami is considered to be nil. 2.8 Settlement Several components of settlement were considered in evaluating the total settlement at the site including seismic settlement of the underlying alluvium, hydro-collapse settlement of alluvium, and settlement of foundations due to foundation loads. Hydro-collapse potential of the underlying alluvium was evaluated based upon available geotechnical data including in-situ densities and hydro-collapse test results. Hydro-collapse potential of the underlying materials is considered negligible (i.e. less than 0.7%). Hence, the hydro-consolidation settlement potential of the underlying alluvium is considered negligible. As previously discussed, seismic settlement of the alluvium at the site was evaluated and is expected to be on the order of approximately up to 2 inches, or less. Seismic settlement of engineered compacted fill is assumed to be negligible. Therefore, differential seismic induced settlements of up to 1.0 inch should be considered in the foundation design. This seismic settlement should be added to other settlement components due to static loads. Structures planned at the site are expected to be of conventional wood-frame construction, and the loads on the footings are not expected to exceed 1,500± lb/ft2. Foundation settlements due to static column loads are expected to be minor, on the order of 1-inch, or less. 2.9 Slope Stability No significant permanent slopes currently exist onsite or are planned for the subject site, therefore slope stability is not considered an issue with respect to site development. 400 Project No.223011-01 Page 9 November 10, 2023 2.10 Laboratory Testing Laboratory testing of the onsite soils was performed on representative samples obtained from the borings and included moisture and density tests, maximum density and optimum moisture content, grain size distribution, Atterberg Limits, expansion, direct shear, consolidation, collapse, and corrosion testing. Laboratory testing was performed by EGLAB, Inc. (EGL). LGC has reviewed the laboratory test data, procedures and results performed by EGL with respect to the subject site and concurs with and accepts responsibility as geotechnical engineer of record for their work (laboratory testing). A discussion of the tests performed, and printout of the laboratory test results are presented in Appendix C. The moisture and density test results are presented on the boring logs in Appendix B. Preliminary expansion potential testing of the upper site soils indicated expansion index of 0, “Non Expansive” (per ASTM D4829). Sulfate testing indicated soluble sulfate content of 0.002 percent (“Negligible” per ACI 318R-14 Table 19.3.1.1). A corrosion suite (pH, resistivity, and chloride content) was also performed on a sample obtained from the geotechnical boring to estimate the corrosion potential of onsite soils. The resistivity tests resulted in a minimum resistivity of 16,000 ohm-centimeters, a pH of 7.81, and chloride content of 185 ppm. Test results are provided in Appendix C. These results/assumptions should be confirmed at the completion of site grading. 2.11 Percolation Testing Our percolation/infiltration field-testing study was performed in general accordance with Appendix B - Infiltration Testing Guidelines of the Riverside County Whitewater River Region Stormwater Quality Best Management Practice, Design Handbook for Low Impact Development (RCFCWCD, 2014). The percolation/infiltration study was performed on November 6 through 8, 2023 such that the soils being tested at the bottom of the borings/test holes were at the designed bottom elevation of the proposed storm water basins at the site. The approximate locations of the percolation tests are presented on Figure 2. Our percolation/infiltration study consisted of the excavation of four 8-inch diameter borings to depths ranging from approximately 11 to 12.5 feet below the existing ground surface, presoaking prior to the percolation/infiltration testing, followed by percolation testing in accordance with the deep percolation test procedures presented in Appendix B - Section 2.3 of the Riverside County Whitewater River Region Stormwater Quality Best Management Practice, Design Handbook for Low Impact Development. Based on our geologic logging of the soil cuttings from the borings/test holes, the soils encountered in all four borings/test holes consisted of silty fine to medium grain sand. After excavation of the test borings, 2-inches of washed pea gravel was placed in the bottom of the holes and a 2-inch diameter PVC pipe consisting of 5 feet of slotted pipe (at the bottom) and solid pipe was placed in the hole. Washed pea gravel was placed in the lower approximately 6 feet of the hole to minimize scour and caving of the boring bottom and sidewalls in the zone of percolation testing. Prior to the start of the percolation testing, based on the soils of the borings/test holes consisting of “sandy soils containing little or no clay”, the test holes were presoaked for a minimum of 2 hours by maintaining a constant water level of approximately 4 to 5 feet above the bottom of the boring/test hole. 401 Project No.223011-01 Page 10 November 10, 2023 Upon completion of the presoaking, the percolation tests were performed in general accordance with Section 2.3 - Percolation Tests, Deep Percolation (Depths 10-40 feet) procedures (RCFCWCD, 2014). The initial percolation testing of all four borings/test holes indicated that significantly greater than 6-inches of water seeped away in two consecutive 25-minute test periods (in actuality, more than 6 inches of water seeped away in less than 5 minutes). Consequently, the percolation testing was conducted in accordance with the “sandy soils” procedure at each of the four borings/test holes by filling the holes with clear water (at a water height of at least 5 times the radius of the borehole) and measuring the water drop at 5-minute intervals (as the water completely seeped away prior to the standard 10 minute interval). After each 5-minute interval, the holes were refilled to a water height of at least 5 times the radius of the borehole and measured at least 12 times over a one-hour period. The measurement of the last 5-minute period was then used to determine the percolation rate for each of the borings/test holes. Adjustment of the obtained percolation test results to an “infiltration rate” was performed utilizing the Porchet Method. The percolation testing indicated “unadjusted” infiltration rates ranging from 13.7 to 19.8 inches per hour at the locations tested. The results of the testing are provided in Appendix B. Based on Table 1 - Infiltration Testing Requirements of the Riverside County Whitewater River Region Stormwater Quality Best Management Practice, Design Handbook for Low Impact Development that indicated a factor-of-safety of equal or greater than 3 for Testing Option 2 (percolation testing with a minimum of four tests with at least two per BMP location); an “adjusted” infiltration rate of 4.5 inches per hour for the Storm Drain Basin adjacent to Lot 65 and an “adjusted” infiltration rate of 6.5 inches per hour for the Storm Drain Basin adjacent to Lot 12 should be assumed in the design of the basins. 402 Project No.223011-01 Page 11 November 10, 2023 3.0 CONCLUSIONS Based on the results of our geotechnical evaluation and review, it is our opinion that the proposed site development is feasible from a geotechnical standpoint, provided the following recommendations included in this report are incorporated into the project plans and specifications, and followed during site grading and construction. Our geotechnical conclusions are as follows:  The site is not located within an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone (Hart, 1997).  Groundwater was not encountered in our geotechnical test pits or borings and is interpreted to be far below the ground surface.  The site is not evaluated for a potential for liquefaction due to the depth of the groundwater table. As such and based on our site assessment, liquefaction potential is considered very low to nil.  Total static and seismically induced settlements of up to 3 inches with differential settlements of up to 1.5 inches in 30 feet should be considered in the foundation design.  Based on the subsurface exploration and our review, the site is underlain by a thin layer of undocumented artificial fill over alluvium. The existing fill and alluvial soils are considered potentially compressible/collapsible in the upper approximately three feet.  The anticipated site excavation and the proposed construction will not have an adverse impact on the adjacent properties.  Active or potentially active faults are not known to exist on the site. The closest active fault is the San Andreas fault located approximately four miles from the site.  Structures should be designed to be supported by a post-tension or mat slab foundation system designed to account for the anticipated static and seismic settlements.  Laboratory test results of the onsite soils indicate non-expansive soils (very low expansion potential category).  Laboratory test results of the onsite soils indicate negligible soluble sulfate contents and should be considered negligible to mildly corrosive to metals.  Laboratory test results of the onsite soils indicate a negligible potential of hydro-collapse underlying the recommended remedial removals.  The onsite soils below recommended remedial grading/excavation depths have a low potential for static settlement (i.e., slightly compressible).  From a geotechnical perspective, the existing onsite soils are suitable for use as fill, provided they are relatively free from rocks (larger than 6 inches in maximum dimension), construction debris, and organic material. Our percolation testing conclusions are as follows:  Based on the results of our evaluation and percolation testing, on-site soils located within 7 to 12 feet below the existing grade at the approximate locations of the proposed infiltration systems are considered to be suitable for water infiltration provided the system meets the following guidelines.  Based upon the relative density of the on-site soils as encountered during our investigations, any water infiltration from a proposed infiltration well is not anticipated to result in settlement or hydro- collapse to the soils underlying the site and therefore will not negatively impact any adjacent structures or improvements. 403 Project No.223011-01 Page 12 November 10, 2023  Based on data presented in this report for the percolation rate of representative onsite soils, it is our opinion that the percolation rate measured in Percolation Test Hole PT-1 through PT-4 are representative of the onsite soils within the vicinity of those locations. The measured percolation rates range from 491 to 670 inches per hour.  Using the Porchet method and a factor of safety of 3, the “unadjusted” infiltration rates range from 13.7 to 19.8 inches per hour.  The stormwater system design should apply the necessary correction factors, based on the chosen stormwater infiltration system. Infiltration facilities require a minimum soil infiltration rate of 0.5 in/hr. If the rate exceeds 2.4 in/hr, then the runoff should be fully treated in an upstream BMP prior to infiltration to protect the groundwater quality.  Any proposed infiltration system should be set-back a minimum of 10 feet from the property line.  Proposed stormwater infiltration systems are not anticipated to adversely impact soil structure interaction, provided that the percolation area is setback a minimum of 10 feet from any building or wall foundations.  Groundwater was not encountered. As such, infiltration is not within ten feet of a known groundwater table.  The infiltration facility shall be designed to overflow to the golf course in the event that the drainage capacity is exceeded or in case of future failure to adequately infiltrate.  The proper use and maintenance of the drainage systems are critical to maintain the useful design life per the guidelines set forth by the drain manufacturer.  The proposed stormwater infiltration will not have an adverse effect to the proposed site development from a liquefaction standpoint. 404 Project No.223011-01 Page 13 November 10, 2023 4.0 RECOMMENDATIONS 4.1 Site Earthwork We anticipate that earthwork at the site will consist of site preparation, removal of any existing pavement area, followed by remedial removals and site grading followed by construction of slab-on- grade type foundations for the proposed residential structures, installation of utilities, subsequently followed by paving/pouring of driveways and streets. We recommend that earthwork onsite be performed in accordance with the recommendations herein, the City of Palm Desert, and the General Earthwork and Grading Specifications for Rough Grading included in Appendix E. In case of conflict, the recommendations in the following sections shall supersede those included as part of Appendix E. 4.1.1 Site Preparation Prior to grading areas to receive structural fill or engineered structures, all ground surfaces should be cleared of obstructions, any existing debris and stripped of vegetation. Heavy vegetation and debris should be removed and properly disposed of offsite. All debris from any demolition activities (including removal of the existing asphaltic concrete) at the site should also be removed and disposed off-site or blended into site fill within street areas at concentrations no greater than 25 percent of the soil volume. Holes or depressions resulting from the removal of buried obstructions should be replaced with compacted fill. Following remedial removals, areas to receive fill should be scarified to a minimum depth of 12 inches, brought to a near-optimum moisture condition, and recompacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction (based on American Standard of Testing and Materials [ASTM] Test Method D1557). 4.1.2 Removal and Recompaction As discussed in Section 2.2, the upper portion of the site is underlain by potentially compressible/collapsible or unsuitable soils (i.e. existing fills and alluvium), which may settle under the addition of water, under the surcharge of fill and/or foundation loads. Compressible materials not removed by the planned grading should be excavated to competent material and replaced with compacted fill soils. We anticipate removals on the site to be on the order of approximately 3 feet below existing grade or a minimum of 2-feet below proposed footing bottom elevations, whichever is deeper, to remove unsuitable fills and alluvium; however, localized, deeper removals should be anticipated where deemed necessary by the geotechnical consultant based on observations during grading. Removal bottoms should be scarified to a minimum depth of 12 inches, brought to at least optimum-moisture content, and recompacted to a minimum 90 percent relative compaction. The fill prism beneath the building footings should extend downward at a 1:1 (horizontal to vertical) slope from the outside edge of the footing bottoms. The removals should extend to the entire pad to account for any future structures. In general, the intent of the remedial removals is to remove all undocumented fills, and unsuitable alluvium. 405 Project No.223011-01 Page 14 November 10, 2023 Compressible materials, within areas planned to support pavement or other appurtenant structures outside of the proposed building footprints, should be excavated to competent material and replaced with compacted fill soils. We anticipate these removals on the site to be on the order of approximately 3 feet below existing grade; however, localized, deeper removals should be anticipated where deemed necessary by the geotechnical consultant based on observations during grading. Removal bottoms should be scarified to a minimum depth of 12 inches, brought to at least optimum-moisture content, and recompacted. All remedial grading is to be within grading limits. Based on our site review and subsurface excavations, groundwater is not anticipated to be encountered during site excavation. From a geotechnical perspective, material that is removed may be placed as fill provided the material is relatively free from rocks (greater than 6 inches in maximum dimension), organic material and construction debris, is moisture-conditioned or dried (as needed) to obtain above-optimum moisture content, and then recompacted prior to additional fill placement or construction. 4.1.3 Shrinkage/Bulking Based on the site soils, bulking is not anticipated at the site. The preliminary estimated shrinkage factors of approximately 5 to 10 percent for the alluvium and existing fill may be used for consideration of earthwork calculations. These are preliminary rough estimates which will vary with depth of removal, stripping losses, field conditions at the time of grading, etc. In addition, handling losses are not included in the estimates. 4.1.4 Temporary Excavation Stability In general, all excavations should be performed in accordance with project plans, specifications, and all Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) requirements. Excavations should be laid back or shored in accordance with OSHA requirements before personnel or equipment are allowed to enter. Soil conditions should be mapped and frequently checked by a representative of LGC to verify conditions are as anticipated. The contractor shall be responsible for providing the “competent person” required by OSHA standards to evaluate soil conditions. Close coordination with the geotechnical engineer should be maintained to facilitate construction while providing safe excavations. Excavation safety is the responsibility of the contractor. Temporary excavations maybe cut vertically up to five feet. Excavations over five feet should be slot-cut, shored, or cut no steeper than 1H: 1V (horizontal, H: vertical, V) slope gradient. Surface water should be diverted away from the exposed cut, and not be allowed to pond on top of the excavations. Temporary cuts should not be left open for an extended period of time. Planned temporary conditions should be reviewed by the geotechnical consultant of record in order to reduce the potential for sidewall failure. The geotechnical consultant may provide recommendations for controlling the length of sidewall exposed. 406 Project No.223011-01 Page 15 November 10, 2023 4.1.5 Fill Placement and Compaction From a geotechnical perspective, the onsite soils are suitable for use as compacted fill, provided they are screened of large, oversized rocks, organic material, and construction debris. Areas prepared to receive structural fill and/or other surface improvements should be scarified to a minimum depth of 6 inches, brought to at least optimum-moisture content, and recompacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction (based on ASTM Test Method D1557). The optimum lift thickness to produce a uniformly compacted fill will depend on the type and size of compaction equipment used. In general, fill should be placed in uniform lifts generally not exceeding 8 inches in loose thickness. Placement and compaction of fill should be performed in accordance with local grading ordinances under the observation and testing of the geotechnical consultant. In general, oversized material shall not be placed within 10 vertical feet of finish grade or within 2 feet of future utilities or underground construction. Rebar should be removed from concrete rubble prior to burial or mixing with fill. Oversize material may be incorporated into design fills in accordance with our standard grading details. If possible, import soils should contain not contain oversized materials and have a low expansion potential. 4.1.6 Trench Backfill and Compaction The onsite soils may generally be suitable as trench backfill provided, they are screened of oversized rocks, any other deleterious materials and organic matter. Trench backfill should be compacted in uniform lifts (generally not exceeding 8 inches in compacted thickness) by mechanical means to at least 90 percent relative compaction (per ASTM Test Method D1557). If trenches are shallow and the use of conventional equipment may result in damage to the utilities; clean sand, having sand equivalent (SE) of 30 or greater, should be used to bed and shade the utilities. On-site soils have an SE of 70 and are considered suitable to be used as bedding and shading for the pipes. Sand backfill should be densified. The densification may be accomplished by jetting or flooding and then tamping to ensure adequate compaction. A representative from LGC should observe, probe, and test the backfill to verify compliance with the project specifications. 4.2 Foundations 4.2.1 General Preliminary recommendations for foundation design and foundation construction are presented herein. When the structural loads for the proposed structures are known they should be provided to our office to verify the recommendations presented herein. The following foundation recommendations are provided for support of anticipated at grade residential structures: post-tension, and Mat slab foundations, for use as needed. For preliminary design purposes a low expansion potential should be considered for design. The as- 407 Project No.223011-01 Page 16 November 10, 2023 graded soil conditions should be verified as the completion of grading. The information and recommendations presented in this section are not meant to supersede design by the project structural engineer or civil engineer specializing in the structural design nor impede those recommendations by a corrosion consultant. Should conflict arise, modifications to the foundation design provided herein can be provided. 4.2.2 Bearing Capacity Shallow foundations may be designed for a maximum allowable bearing capacity of 1,500 lb/ft2 (gross), for continuous footings a minimum of 12 inches wide and 12 inches deep, and spread footings 24 inches wide and 18 inches deep, into certified compacted fill. A factor of safety greater than 3 was used in evaluating the above bearing capacity value. This value maybe increased by 300 psf for each additional foot in depth and 150 psf for each additional foot of width to a maximum value of 3,000 psf. Bearing values indicated above are for total dead loads and frequently applied live loads. The above vertical bearing may be increased by one-third for short durations of loading which will include the effect of wind or seismic forces. Lateral forces on footings may be resisted by passive earth resistance and friction at the bottom of the footing. Foundations may be designed for a coefficient of friction of 0.35, and a passive earth pressure of 250 lb/ft2/ft to a maximum value of 2,500 psf. The passive earth pressure incorporates a factor of safety of greater than 1.5. The above passive pressure may be increased by one-third for short durations of loading which will include the effect of wind or seismic forces. Lateral passive resistance is based on the assumption that backfill next to the foundations is properly compacted. All footing excavations should be cut square and level as much as possible, and should be free of sloughed materials including sand, rocks and gravel, and trash debris. Subgrade soils should be pre-moistened for the very low to low expansion potential. These allowable bearing pressures are applicable for level (ground slope equal to or flatter than 5H:1V) conditions only. 4.2.3 Post-Tension Foundations Based on the site geotechnical conditions and provided the remedial recommendations provided herein are implemented, the site may be considered suitable for the support of the anticipated structures using a post-tensioned slab-on-grade foundation system for very low to low expansion potential (0-50 Expansion Index). The following section summaries our recommendations for the foundation system. The post-tension parameters provided in the following table are based on the expansion potential only, and do not incorporate any increase for static and seismically induced differential settlements. Static and differential settlements of up to 1.5 inches in 30 feet should also be considered in the foundation design. 408 Project No.223011-01 Page 17 November 10, 2023 TABLE 2 Preliminary Geotechnical Parameters for Post-Tensioned Foundation Design Parameter Value Expansion Classification (Assumed to be confirmed at the completion of grading): Very Low to Low Expansion Thornthwaite Moisture Index (From Figure 3.3): -20 Constant Soil Suction (From Figure 3.4): PF 3.6 Center Lift Edge moisture variation distance (from Figure 3.6), em: Center lift, ym: Very Low To Low 9.0 feet 0.30 inches Edge Lift Edge moisture variation distance (from Figure 3.6), em: Edge lift, ym: Very Low to Low 5.2 feet 0.61 inches Soluble Sulfate Content for Design of Concrete Mix in Contact with Site Soils in Accordance with American Concrete Institute standard 318, Section 4.3: Negligible Exposure (Based on preliminary testing – needs to be confirmed at the completion of grading) Corrosivity of Earth Materials to Ferrous Metals: Mildly Corrosive Modulus of Subgrade Reaction, k (assuming presaturation as indicated below): 150 pci (high) Additional Recommendations: 1. Presaturate slab subgrade to at least 1.2 times optimum moisture, to minimum depths of 12 inches below ground surface, respectively for very low to low expansion potentials. 2. Install an underslab moisture/vapor barrier. The underslab moisture retarder (i.e. an equivalent capillary break method) should consist of a 15-mil thick polyolefin (or equivalent) in conformance with ASTM E 1745 Class A material underlain by a minimum 1-inch of sand, as needed. The sand layer requirements above the vapor barrier are the purview of the foundation engineer/structural engineer, and should be provided in accordance with ACI Publication 302 “Guide for Concrete Floor and Slab Construction”. These recommendations must be confirmed (and/or altered) by the foundation engineer, based upon the performance expectations of the foundation. Ultimately, the design of the moisture retarder system and recommendations for concrete placement and curing are the purview of the foundation engineer, in consideration of the project requirements provided by the architect and developer. 3. Minimum perimeter foundation embedment below finish grade for moisture cut off should be 18 inches. 4. Minimum slab thickness should be 5 inches. * The above sand and Visqueen recommendations are traditionally included with geotechnical foundation recommendations although they are generally not a major factor influencing the geotechnical performance of the foundation. The sand and Visqueen requirements are the purview of the foundation engineer/corrosion engineer (in accordance with ACI Publication 302 “Guide for Concrete Floor and Slab Construction”) and the homebuilder to ensure that the concrete cures more evenly than it would otherwise, is protected from corrosive environments, and moisture penetration of through the floor is acceptable to future homeowners. Therefore, the above recommendations may be superseded by the requirements of the previously mentioned parties. 409 Project No.223011-01 Page 18 November 10, 2023 4.2.4 Mat Foundation A mat foundation can be used for support of proposed residential buildings. An allowable soil bearing pressure of 1,000 psf may be used for the design of the mat at the surface under the slab area. The allowable bearing value is for total dead loads and frequently applied live loads and may be increased by one-third for short durations of loading which will include the effect of wind or seismic forces. A coefficient of vertical subgrade reaction, k, of 150 pounds per cubic inch (pci) may be used to evaluate the pressure distribution beneath the mat foundation. The magnitude of total and differential settlements of the mat foundation will be a function of the structural design and stiffness of the mat. Resistance to lateral loads can be provided by friction acting at the base of foundations and by passive earth pressure. Foundations may be designed for a coefficient of friction of 0.35. Coordination with the structural engineer will be required in order to ensure structural loads are adequately distributed throughout the mat foundation to avoid localized stress concentrations resulting in potential settlement. The foundation plan should be reviewed by LGC to confirm preliminary estimated total and differential static settlements. 4.2.5 Foundation Settlement Based on our current understanding of the project, the results of our site investigation and the recommended remedial grading with shallow foundations embedded into compacted fills or competent native soils, we estimate the post-construction static settlement of the site to be 1- inch with a differential settlement of approximately of 0.5-inches in 30 feet. Post-construction settlements should also include the estimated differential seismically induced dry sand settlements of 1-inch in 30 feet. Total static and seismic differential settlement of 1.5-inches in 30 feet should be considered in the design. 4.3 Lateral Earth Pressures for Retaining Walls The following lateral earth pressures may be used for the design of any future site retaining walls, if any. Due to the sandy nature of onsite soils, we recommend site retaining walls be backfilled with select onsite soils or clean sand having a sand equivalence of greater than 30. Select soils should consist of clean, granular soils (less than 15 percent passing the No. 200 sieve) of very low expansion potential (expansion index 20 or less based on U.B.C. 18-2). Site soils are considered suitable for wall backfill and meet the above criteria. The recommended lateral pressures for clean sand or approved select soils for level or sloping backfill are presented in Table 3. 410 Project No.223011-01 Page 19 November 10, 2023 TABLE 3 Lateral Earth Pressures for Retaining Walls Conditions Equivalent Fluid Weight (pcf) Level Backfill 2:1 Backfill Sloping Upwards Approved Select Material Approved Select Material Active 35 50 At Rest 55 80 Passive 250  For design purposes, the recommended equivalent fluid pressure for each case for walls founded above the static ground water and backfilled with approved select soils is provided in Table 3. The equivalent fluid pressure values assume free-draining conditions. If conditions other than those assumed above are anticipated, the equivalent fluid pressure values should be provided on an individual-case basis by the geotechnical engineer. Surcharge loading effects from the adjacent structures should be evaluated by the geotechnical and structural engineers. Retaining wall structures should be provided with appropriate drainage and appropriately waterproofed. The outlet pipe should be sloped to drain to a suitable outlet. Typical wall drainage design is illustrated on Figure 3. It should be noted that the recommended subdrain does not provide protection against seepage through the face of the wall and/or efflorescence. Efflorescence is generally a white crystalline powder (discoloration) that results when water, which contains soluble salts, migrates over a period of time through the face of a retaining wall and evaporates. If such seepage or efflorescence is undesirable, retaining walls should be waterproofed to reduce this potential. For sliding resistance, a friction coefficient of 0.35 may be used at the concrete and soil interface. Wall footings should be designed in accordance with structural considerations. Refer to Sections 4.2.2 for allowable soil bearing. 4.4 Preliminary Pavement Recommendations Asphaltic Concrete Based on a preliminary design R-value of 35, we recommend the following preliminary minimum street sections for Traffic Indices of 5, 6, and 7 (Table 4). These recommendations should be confirmed with R-value testing of representative near-surface soils at the completion of grading. Final street sections should be confirmed by the project civil engineer based upon the projected Traffic Index. In addition, additional sections can be provided based on other traffic indices. Table 4 Preliminary Pavement Design Sections Assumed Traffic Index 6 7 R-Value Subgrade 35 35 AC Thickness 4 inches 5 inches Base Thickness 6 inches 7 inches 411 Project No.223011-01 Page 20 November 10, 2023 The aggregate base material should conform to the specifications for Crushed Aggregate Base or Crushed Miscellaneous Base (Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction –SSPWC Section 200-2). The subgrade should achieve a minimum relative compaction of 90 percent. The base material should be compacted to achieve a minimum relative compaction of 95 percent. Base and subgrade materials should be moisture-conditioned to a relatively uniform moisture content at or slightly over optimum. Portland Cement Concrete Pavement Portland Cement Concrete Pavement (PCCP) may be designed using a minimum of 6-inches of Portland cement concrete over 6-inches of compacted aggregate base. The modulus of rupture of the concrete should be a minimum of 500 pounds per square inch (psi) at 28 days. Contraction joints should be placed at maximum 15-foot spacing. Where the outer edge of a concrete pavement connects to an asphalt pavement, the concrete slab should be thickened by 50 percent at a taper not to exceed a slope of 1 in 10. This section is only applicable for passenger car driveway areas and should be thickened if heavy truck loading is anticipated. In addition, additional sections can be provided based on other desired anticipated traffic loadings. The aggregate base material should conform to the specifications for Crushed Aggregate Base or Crushed Miscellaneous Base (Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction –SSPWC Section 200-2). The subgrade should achieve a minimum relative compaction of 90 percent. The base material should be compacted to achieve a minimum relative compaction of 95 percent. Base and subgrade materials should be moisture-conditioned to a relatively uniform moisture content at or slightly over optimum. Vehicular Concrete Pavers Vehicular pavers are typically 3-1/8 inches in thickness and are underlain by 1-inch of sand. Based on ASCE 58-10 for interlocking pavers, considering a Traffic Index (TI) of 6 and an R-value of 35 for the subgrade soils, we recommend the following base section underlying the proposed pavers. The proposed pavers and sand should be underlain by a minimum of 12-inches of aggregate base. As an alternative interlocking pavers and sand bedding can also be placed directly on the design asphaltic concrete base course over aggregate base, considering a TI of 6, or can be placed on a minimum of 6-inches of concrete over competent native. The design pavement sections provided herein are considered suitable to support the imposed loads from a fire apparatus. The aggregate base material should conform to the specifications for Crushed Aggregate Base or Crushed Miscellaneous Base (Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction –SSPWC Section 200-2). The subgrade should achieve a minimum relative compaction of 90 percent per ASTM- D1557. The base material should be compacted to achieve a minimum relative compaction of 95 percent. Base and subgrade materials should be moisture-conditioned to a relatively uniform moisture content at or slightly over optimum. 412 Project No.223011-01 Page 21 November 10, 2023 4.5 Corrosivity to Concrete and Metal The National Association of Corrosion Engineers (NACE) defines corrosion as “a deterioration of a substance or its properties because of a reaction with its environment.” From a geotechnical viewpoint, the “environment” is the prevailing foundation soils and the “substances” are the reinforced concrete foundations or various buried metallic elements such as rebar, piles, pipes, etc., which are in direct contact with or within close vicinity of the foundation soil. In general, soil environments that are detrimental to concrete have high concentrations of soluble sulfates and/or pH values of less than 5.5. ACI 318R-14 Table 19.3.2.1, provides specific guidelines for the concrete mix design when the soluble sulfate content of the soils exceeds 0.1 percent by weight or 1,000 ppm. The minimum amount of chloride ions in the soil environment that are corrosive to steel, either in the form of reinforcement protected by concrete cover, or plain steel substructures such as steel pipes or piles, is 500 ppm per California Test 532. Based on site soil testing, the onsite soils are classified as having a negligible sulfate exposure condition in accordance with ACI 318R-14 Table 19.3.2.1. As a preliminary recommendation due to results of sulfate content testing, concrete in contact with onsite soils should be designed in accordance with ACI 318R-14 Table 19.3.2.1 for the negligible category. It is also our opinion that onsite soils should be preliminarily considered mildly corrosive to buried metals. The client and/or other members of the design team should consider this potential as they determine necessary. LGC is not a corrosion consultant and does not provide recommendations related to corrosion. 4.6 Nonstructural Concrete Flatwork Concrete Flatwork Concrete flatwork (such as walkways, patios, entryways, etc.) have a high potential for cracking due to changes in soil volume related to soil-moisture fluctuations because these slabs are typically much thinner than foundation slabs and are not reinforced with the same dynamic as foundation elements. To reduce the potential for excessive cracking and lifting, concrete should be designed in accordance with the minimum guidelines outlined below in Table 5. These guidelines will reduce the potential for irregular cracking and promote cracking along construction joints, but will not eliminate all cracking or lifting. Thickening the concrete and/or adding additional reinforcement will further reduce cosmetic distress. The following Table 5 is provided, as necessary. 413 Project No.223011-01 Page 22 November 10, 2023 TABLE 5 Nonstructural Concrete Flatwork Minimum Thickness (in.) 4 Presaturation Presoak to 12 inches Reinforcement No. 3 at 24 inches on centers or 6x6 No. 6 x No. 6 WWM Crack Control Joints Saw cut or deep open tool joint to a minimum of 1/3 the concrete thickness Maximum Joint Spacing 5 feet 4.7 Swimming Pool Proposed pools (if any) and associated improvements should be constructed in accordance with the attached Figure 4, Geotechnical Guidelines for Swimming Pool Construction. Pool excavation will occur in newly placed compacted fills and is anticipated to be relatively uniform. Consideration should be given to the low expansion potential of onsite soils in design of the pool, and associated decking. The pool/spa should be designed using a minimum lateral equivalent fluid pressure of 60 pounds per cubic foot (pcf). Also, concrete in contact with onsite soils should be designed in accordance with the So/negligible category of ACI 318R Table 19.3.2.1. Due to inherent differences in supporting capacity and expansive potential of different layers of the alluvium/fill, it is undesirable to have structures partially supported on soils having different geotechnical characteristics or materials having different engineering characteristics. If a cut/fill transition or expansive soil condition exists, the cut portion of the transition or expansive soil should be excavated (usually impractical for pool/spa construction), or the pool/spa can be designed with additional reinforcement and/or a thicker shell in order to cope with potential differences in supporting capacity and expansive potential. Excavation and subsequent fill placement for pool including the placement of drains, outlets, water- proofing, etc. should be performed under the observation and testing of a geotechnical consultant. Observation and testing should be performed by the geotechnical consultant during pool excavation to verify that the exposed soil conditions are consistent with the design assumptions. Concrete flatwork adjacent to the pool should be a minimum of 5 inches thick reinforced with No. 3 rebar at 24-inches on center each way with a 12-inch deep perimeter cut-off footing. Construction joints or weakened plane joints should be provided in all flatwork to a minimum depth of 1.5 inches at frequent internals (5 feet or less). The concrete slab should be underlain by a minimum of 4 inches of clean sand or base. Presoaking of the subgrade should be performed to a minimum depth of 12 inches. The subgrade should be inclined so that any moisture that seeps through cracks in the concrete due to irrigation, rain, or pool splash will be directed away from the pool. 414 Project No.223011-01 Page 23 November 10, 2023 4.8 Control of Surface Water and Drainage Control Positive drainage of surface water away from structures is very important. No water should be allowed to pond adjacent to buildings. Positive drainage may be accomplished by providing drainage away from buildings at a gradient of at least 2 percent for a distance of at least 5 feet, and further maintained by a swale or drainage path at a gradient of at least 1 percent. Where necessary, drainage paths may be shortened by use of area drains and collector pipes. Planters with open bottoms adjacent to buildings should be avoided. Planters should not be designed adjacent to buildings unless provisions for drainage, such as catch basins, liners, and/or area drains, are made. Overwatering must be avoided. 4.9 Construction Observation and Testing The recommendations provided in this report are based on limited subsurface observations and geotechnical analysis. The interpolated subsurface conditions should be checked in the field during construction by a representative of LGC. Geotechnical observation and testing should be performed by the geotechnical consultant during site excavations, subgrade for slab/foundation, backfill of utility trenches, preparation of any subgrade and placement of aggregate base, or when any unusual soil conditions are encountered at the site. Grading plans, foundation plans, and final project drawings should be reviewed by this office prior to construction. 415 Project No.223011-01 Page 24 November 10, 2023 5.0 LIMITATIONS Our services were performed using the degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised, under similar circumstances, by reputable engineers and geologists practicing in this or similar localities. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the conclusions and professional advice included in this report. The samples taken and submitted for laboratory testing, the observations made and the in-situ field testing performed are believed representative of the entire project; however, soil and geologic conditions revealed by excavation may be different than our preliminary findings. If this occurs, the changed conditions must be evaluated by the project soils engineer and geologist and design(s) adjusted as required or alternate design(s) recommended. This report is issued with the understanding that it is the responsibility of the owner, or of his/her representative, to ensure that the information and recommendations contained herein are brought to the attention of the architect and/or project engineer and incorporated into the plans, and the necessary steps are taken to see that the contractor and/or subcontractor properly implements the recommendations in the field. The contractor and/or subcontractor should notify the owner if they consider any of the recommendations presented herein to be unsafe. The findings of this report are valid as of the present date. However, changes in the conditions of a property can and do occur with the passage of time, whether they be due to natural processes or the works of man on this or adjacent properties. In addition, changes in applicable or appropriate standards may occur, whether they result from legislation or the broadening of knowledge. Accordingly, the findings of this report may be invalidated wholly or partially by changes outside our control. 416 Project No. 223011-01 Page A-1 November 10, 2023 APPENDIX A References American Concrete Institute, 1985, Manual of Concrete Practice, Parts 1 and 2. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), 2017, Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, ASCE/SEI 7-16, 2017. ASCE 7 Hazard Tool, https://asce7hazardtool.online/ California Building Standards Commission, 2022, California Building Code, California Code of Regulations Title 24, Volumes 1 and 2, dated July 2022. California Geological Survey, 1997, Guidelines for Evaluating and Mitigating Seismic Hazards in California, dated March 13, 1997, SP 117. Dibble, Thomas W., 2004, Geologic Map of the Palm Springs Quadrangle, Riverside County, California, Dibblee Geology Center Map #DF-123. Hart, E. W., and Bryant, W.A., 1997, Fault-Rupture Hazard Zones in California, Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act with Index to Earthquake Fault Zone Maps: California Division of Mines and Geology, SP 42. Ishihara, K., 1985, “Stability of Natural Deposits During Earthquakes”. Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering. A.A. Bakema Publishers, Rotterdam, Netherlands. Post-Tensioning Institute, 2006, Design of Post Tensioned Slabs-on-ground, Third Addition, Addendum 1 dated May 2007, and Addendum 2 Dated May 2008. Pradel, D., 1998, “Procedure to Evaluate Earthquake Induced Settlements in Dry Sandy Soils”, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 124, No. 4, April 1998. Sadigh, K., Chang, C.-Y., Egan, J.A., Makdisi, F., and Youngs, R.R. (1997), "Attenuation Relations for Shallow Crustal Earthquakes Based on California Strong Motion Data," Seismological Research Letters, Vol. 68, No. 1, pp. 180-189. Seed, H.B., Tokimatsu, K., Harder, L.F., and Chungh, R.M., 1985, “Influence of SPT Procedures in Soil Liquefaction Resistance Evaluations,” Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 111, No. 12, December 1985. Southern California Earthquake Center, 1999, Recommended Procedures for Implementation of DMG Special Publication 117 Guidelines for Analyzing and Mitigating Liquefaction in California, dated March 1999. 417 Project No. 223011-01 Page A-2 November 10, 2023 APPENDIX A References (cont.) Tokimatsu, Kohji, and Seed, H.B., “Evaluation of Settlements in Sands Due to Earthquake Shaking,” Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 113, No. 8, August 1987. United States Geological Survey (USGS), 2008a, “2008 National Seismic Hazard Maps – Fault Parameters” Retrieved December 17, 2013, from: http://geohazards.usgs.gov/cfusion/hazfaults_search/hf_search_main.cfm ______, 2008b, “2008 Interactive Deaggregations (Beta),” Retrieved December 12, 2013, from: https://geohazards.usgs.gov/deaggint/2008/ ______, 2013, U.S. Seismic Design Maps, Retrieved December 12, 2013, from: http://geohazards.usgs.gov/designmaps/us/batch.php#csv 418 Project No. 223011-01 Page B-1 November 10, 2023 APPENDIX B Boring Logs and Percolation Test Results 419 Project No. 223011-01 Page C-1 November 10, 2023 APPENDIX C Laboratory Testing Results by EGLAB, Inc. Laboratory testing was performed by EGLAB, Inc. The laboratory testing program was directed towards providing quantitative data relating to the relevant engineering properties of the soils. Samples considered representative of site conditions were tested in general accordance with American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) procedure and/or California Test Methods (CTM), where applicable. The following summary is a brief outline of the test type and the results are presented on the following pages. LGC has reviewed the laboratory test data, procedures and results performed by EGLAB, Inc. (EGL) with respect to the subject site and concurs with and accepts responsibility as geotechnical engineer of record for their work (laboratory testing). Moisture and Density Determination Tests: Moisture content (ASTM D2216) and dry density determinations (ASTM D2937) were performed on relatively undisturbed samples obtained from the test borings and/or trenches. The results of these tests are presented in the boring logs. Where applicable, only moisture content was determined from undisturbed or disturbed samples. Soil Classification: Soils were classified according the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) in accordance with ASTM Test Methods D2487 and D2488. This system uses relies on the Atterberg Limits and grain size distribution of a soil. The soil classifications (or group symbol) are shown on the laboratory test data, and boring logs. Expansion Index: The expansion potential of selected samples were evaluated by the Expansion Index Test, U.B.C. Standard No. 18-2 and/or ASTM D4829. Specimens are molded under a given compactive energy to approximately the optimum moisture content and approximately 50 percent saturation or approximately 90 percent relative compaction. The prepared 1-inch-thick by 4-inch-diameter specimens are loaded to an equivalent 144 psf surcharge and are inundated with tap water until volumetric equilibrium is reached. Maximum Density Tests: The maximum dry density and optimum moisture content of typical materials were determined in accordance with ASTM D1557. Atterberg Limits: The liquid and plastic limits (“Atterberg Limits”) were determined in accordance with ASTM Test Method D4318 for engineering classification of fine-grained material. Chloride Content: Chloride content was tested in accordance with Caltrans Test Method (CTM) 422. Soluble Sulfates: The soluble sulfate contents of selected samples were determined by standard geotechnical methods (CTM 417). The soluble sulfate content is used to determine the appropriate cement type and maximum water-cement ratios. Minimum Resistivity and pH Tests: Minimum resistivity and pH tests were performed in general accordance with CTM 643 and standard geochemical methods. The electrical resistivity of a soil is a measure of its resistance to the flow of electrical current. As a results of soil’s resistivity decreases corrosivity increases. 420 Project No. 223011-01 Page C-2 November 10, 2023 Consolidation: Consolidation tests were performed on selected, relatively undisturbed ring samples (Modified ASTM Test Method D2435). Samples (2.42 inches in diameter and 1 inch in height) were placed in a consolidometer and increasing loads were applied. The samples were allowed to consolidate under “double drainage” and total deformation for each loading step was recorded. The percent consolidation for each load step was recorded as the ratio of the amount of vertical compression to the original sample height Grain Size Distribution: Representative samples were dried, weighed, and soaked in water until individual soil particles were separated (per ASTM D421) and then washed on a No. 200 sieve. The portion retained on the No. 200 sieve was dried and then sieved on a U.S. Standard brass sieve set in accordance with ASTM D422 (CTM 202). Hyrdo-consolidation: Hydro-consolidation tests (collapse) were performed on selected, relatively undisturbed ring samples (ASTM D4546). Samples were placed in a consolidometer and a load approximately equal to the in-situ overburden pressure was applied. Water was then added to the sample and the percent hydro-consolidation under the applied load was measured. The percent for the load was calculated as the ratio of the amount of vertical deformation to the original sample height. The percent hydroconsolidation is presented is the following graphs. Direct Shear: Direct shear tests were performed on selected remolded and/or undisturbed samples, which were soaked for a minimum of 24 hours under a surcharge equal to the applied normal force during testing. After transfer of the sample to the shear box, and reloading the sample, pore pressures set up in the sample due to the transfer were allowed to dissipate for a period of approximately 1 hour prior to application of shearing force. The samples were tested under various normal loads, a motor-driven, strain-controlled, direct-shear testing apparatus at a strain rate of less than 0.001 to 0.5 inch per minute (depending upon the soil type). R-Value: The resistance R-value was determined by the ASTM D2844 for base, subbase, and basement soils. The samples were prepared and exudation pressure and R-value were determined. The graphically determined R-value at exudation pressure of 300 psi is reported in Appendix __. These results were used for pavement design purposes. Sand Equivalent: The sand equivalent (SE) of a selected samples were determined in accordance with ASTM D2419. The sand equivalent results are used to determine the applicability of material for use as backfill and to assess whether flooding or jetting is a suitable compaction method. 421 Project No. 223011-01 Page D-1 November 10, 2023 APPENDIX D Seismically Induced Dry Sand Settlement Analysis 422 LGC Valley, Inc. General Earthwork and Grading Specifications Page 1 of 6 APPENDIX E LGC VALLEY, INC. General Earthwork and Grading Specifications For Rough Grading 1.0 General 1.1 Intent: These General Earthwork and Grading Specifications are for the grading and earthwork shown on the approved grading plan(s) and/or indicated in the geotechnical report(s). These Specifications are a part of the recommendations contained in the geotechnical report(s). In case of conflict, the specific recommendations in the geotechnical report shall supersede these more general Specifications. Observations of the earthwork by the project Geotechnical Consultant during the course of grading may result in new or revised recommendations that could supersede these specifications or the recommendations in the geotechnical report(s). 1.2 The Geotechnical Consultant of Record: Prior to commencement of work, the owner shall employ a qualified Geotechnical Consultant of Record (Geotechnical Consultant). The Geotechnical Consultant shall be responsible for reviewing the approved geotechnical report(s) and accepting the adequacy of the preliminary geotechnical findings, conclusions, and recommendations prior to the commencement of the grading. Prior to commencement of grading, the Geotechnical Consultant shall review the "work plan" prepared by the Earthwork Contractor (Contractor) and schedule sufficient personnel to perform the appropriate level of observation, mapping, and compaction testing. During the grading and earthwork operations, the Geotechnical Consultant shall observe, map, and document the subsurface exposures to verify the geotechnical design assumptions. If the observed conditions are found to be significantly different than the interpreted assumptions during the design phase, the Geotechnical Consultant shall inform the owner, recommend appropriate changes in design to accommodate the observed conditions, and notify the review agency where required. The Geotechnical Consultant shall observe the moisture-conditioning and processing of the subgrade and fill materials and perform relative compaction testing of fill to confirm that the attained level of compaction is being accomplished as specified. The Geotechnical Consultant shall provide the test results to the owner and the Contractor on a routine and frequent basis. 423 LGC Valley, Inc. General Earthwork and Grading Specifications Page 2 of 6 1.3 The Earthwork Contractor: The Earthwork Contractor (Contractor) shall be qualified, experienced, and knowledgeable in earthwork logistics, preparation and processing of ground to receive fill, moisture-conditioning and processing of fill, and compacting fill. The Contractor shall review and accept the plans, geotechnical report(s), and these Specifications prior to commencement of grading. The Contractor shall be solely responsible for performing the grading in accordance with the project plans and specifications. The Contractor shall prepare and submit to the owner and the Geotechnical Consultant a work plan that indicates the sequence of earthwork grading, the number of “equipment” of work and the estimated quantities of daily earthwork contemplated for the site prior to commencement of grading. The Contractor shall inform the owner and the Geotechnical Consultant of changes in work schedules and updates to the work plan at least 24 hours in advance of such changes so that appropriate personnel will be available for observation and testing. . The Contractor shall not assume that the Geotechnical Consultant is aware of all grading operations. The Contractor shall have the sole responsibility to provide adequate equipment and methods to accomplish the earthwork in accordance with the applicable grading codes and agency ordinances, these Specifications, and the recommendations in the approved geotechnical report(s) and grading plan(s). If, in the opinion of the Geotechnical Consultant, unsatisfactory conditions, such as unsuitable soil, improper moisture condition, inadequate compaction, insufficient buttress key size, adverse weather, etc., are resulting in a quality of work less than required in these specifications, the Geotechnical Consultant shall reject the work and may recommend to the owner that construction be stopped until the conditions are rectified. It is the contractor’s sole responsibility to provide proper fill compaction. 2.0 Preparation of Areas to be Filled 2.1 Clearing and Grubbing: Vegetation, such as brush, grass, roots, and other deleterious material shall be sufficiently removed and properly disposed of in a method acceptable to the owner, governing agencies, and the Geotechnical Consultant. The Geotechnical Consultant shall evaluate the extent of these removals depending on specific site conditions. Earth fill material shall not contain more than 1 percent of organic materials (by volume). No fill lift shall contain more than 10 percent of organic matter. Nesting of the organic materials shall not be allowed. If potentially hazardous materials are encountered, the Contractor shall stop work in the affected area, and a hazardous material specialist shall be informed immediately for proper evaluation and handling of these materials prior to continuing to work in that area. 424 LGC Valley, Inc. General Earthwork and Grading Specifications Page 3 of 6 As presently defined by the State of California, most refined petroleum products (gasoline, diesel fuel, motor oil, grease, coolant, etc.) have chemical constituents that are considered to be hazardous waste. As such, the indiscriminate dumping or spillage of these fluids onto the ground may constitute a misdemeanor, punishable by fines and/or imprisonment, and shall not be allowed. The contractor is responsible for all hazardous waste relating to his work. The Geotechnical Consultant does not have expertise in this area. If hazardous waste is a concern, then the Client should acquire the services of a qualified environmental assessor. 2.2 Processing: Existing ground that has been declared satisfactory for support of fill by the Geotechnical Consultant shall be scarified to a minimum depth of 6 inches. Existing ground that is not satisfactory shall be overexcavated as specified in the following section. Scarification shall continue until soils are broken down and free from oversize material and the working surface is reasonably uniform, flat, and free from uneven features that would inhibit uniform compaction. 2.3 Overexcavation: In addition to removals and overexcavations recommended in the approved geotechnical report(s) and the grading plan, soft, loose, dry, saturated, spongy, organic-rich, highly fractured or otherwise unsuitable ground shall be overexcavated to competent ground as evaluated by the Geotechnical Consultant during grading. 2.4 Benching: Where fills are to be placed on ground with slopes steeper than 5:1 (horizontal to vertical units), the ground shall be stepped or benched. Please see the Standard Details for a graphic illustration. The lowest bench or key shall be a minimum of 15 feet wide and at least 2 feet deep, into competent material as evaluated by the Geotechnical Consultant. Other benches shall be excavated a minimum height of 4 feet into competent material or as otherwise recommended by the Geotechnical Consultant. Fill placed on ground sloping flatter than 5:1 shall also be benched or otherwise overexcavated to provide a flat subgrade for the fill. 2.5 Evaluation/Acceptance of Fill Areas: All areas to receive fill, including removal and processed areas, key bottoms, and benches, shall be observed, mapped, elevations recorded, and/or tested prior to being accepted by the Geotechnical Consultant as suitable to receive fill. The Contractor shall obtain a written acceptance from the Geotechnical Consultant prior to fill placement. A licensed surveyor shall provide the survey control for determining elevations of processed areas, keys, and benches. 3.0 Fill Material 3.1 General: Material to be used as fill shall be essentially free from organic matter and other deleterious substances evaluated and accepted by the Geotechnical Consultant prior to placement. Soils of poor quality, such as those with unacceptable gradation, high expansion potential, or low strength shall be placed in areas acceptable to the Geotechnical Consultant or mixed with other soils to achieve satisfactory fill material. 425 LGC Valley, Inc. General Earthwork and Grading Specifications Page 4 of 6 3.2 Oversize: Oversize material defined as rock, or other irreducible material with a maximum dimension greater than 8 inches, shall not be buried or placed in fill unless location, materials, and placement methods are specifically accepted by the Geotechnical Consultant. Placement operations shall be such that nesting of oversized material does not occur and such that oversize material is completely surrounded by compacted or densified fill. Oversize material shall not be placed within 10 vertical feet of finish grade or within 2 feet of future utilities or underground construction. 3.3 Import: If importing of fill material is required for grading, proposed import material shall meet the requirements of Section 3.1. The potential import source shall be given to the Geotechnical Consultant at least 48 hours (2 working days) before importing begins so that its suitability can be determined and appropriate tests performed. 4.0 Fill Placement and Compaction 4.1 Fill Layers: Approved fill material shall be placed in areas prepared to receive fill (per Section 3.0) in near-horizontal layers not exceeding 8 inches in loose thickness. The Geotechnical Consultant may accept thicker layers if testing indicates the grading procedures can adequately compact the thicker layers. Each layer shall be spread evenly and mixed thoroughly to attain relative uniformity of material and moisture throughout. 4.2 Fill Moisture Conditioning: Fill soils shall be watered, dried back, blended, and/or mixed, as necessary to attain a relatively uniform moisture content at or slightly over optimum. Maximum density and optimum soil moisture content tests shall be performed in accordance with the American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM Test Method D1557-91). 4.3 Compaction of Fill: After each layer has been moisture-conditioned, mixed, and evenly spread, it shall be uniformly compacted to not less than 90 percent of maximum dry density (ASTM Test Method D1557-91). Compaction equipment shall be adequately sized and be either specifically designed for soil compaction or of proven reliability to efficiently achieve the specified level of compaction with uniformity. 4.4 Compaction of Fill Slopes: In addition to normal compaction procedures specified above, compaction of slopes shall be accomplished by backrolling of slopes with sheepsfoot rollers at increments of 3 to 4 feet in fill elevation, or by other methods producing satisfactory results acceptable to the Geotechnical Consultant. Upon completion of grading, relative compaction of the fill, out to the slope face, shall be at least 90 percent of maximum density per ASTM Test Method D1557-91. 426 LGC Valley, Inc. General Earthwork and Grading Specifications Page 5 of 6 4.5 Compaction Testing: Field tests for moisture content and relative compaction of the fill soils shall be performed by the Geotechnical Consultant. Location and frequency of tests shall be at the Consultant's discretion based on field conditions encountered. Compaction test locations will not necessarily be selected on a random basis. Test locations shall be selected to verify adequacy of compaction levels in areas that are judged to be prone to inadequate compaction (such as close to slope faces and at the fill/bedrock benches). 4.6 Frequency of Compaction Testing: Tests shall be taken at intervals not exceeding 2 feet in vertical rise and/or 1,000 cubic yards of compacted fill soils embankment. In addition, as a guideline, at least one test shall be taken on slope faces for each 5,000 square feet of slope face and/or each 10 feet of vertical height of slope. The Contractor shall assure that fill construction is such that the testing schedule can be accomplished by the Geotechnical Consultant. The Contractor shall stop or slow down the earthwork construction if these minimum standards are not met. 4.7 Compaction Test Locations: The Geotechnical Consultant shall document the approximate elevation and horizontal coordinates of each test location. The Contractor shall coordinate with the project surveyor to assure that sufficient grade stakes are established so that the Geotechnical Consultant can determine the test locations with sufficient accuracy. At a minimum, two grade stakes within a horizontal distance of 100 feet and vertically less than 5 feet apart from potential test locations shall be provided. 5.0 Subdrain Installation Subdrain systems shall be installed in accordance with the approved geotechnical report(s), the grading plan, and the Standard Details. The Geotechnical Consultant may recommend additional subdrains and/or changes in subdrain extent, location, grade, or material depending on conditions encountered during grading. All subdrains shall be surveyed by a land surveyor/civil engineer for line and grade after installation and prior to burial. Sufficient time should be allowed by the Contractor for these surveys. 6.0 Excavation Excavations, as well as over-excavation for remedial purposes, shall be evaluated by the Geotechnical Consultant during grading. Remedial removal depths shown on geotechnical plans are estimates only. The actual extent of removal shall be determined by the Geotechnical Consultant based on the field evaluation of exposed conditions during grading. Where fill-over-cut slopes are to be graded, the cut portion of the slope shall be made, evaluated, and accepted by the Geotechnical Consultant prior to placement of materials for construction of the fill portion of the slope, unless otherwise recommended by the Geotechnical Consultant. 427 LGC Valley, Inc. General Earthwork and Grading Specifications Page 6 of 6 7.0 Trench Backfills 7.1 The Contractor shall follow all OHSA and Cal/OSHA requirements for safety of trench excavations. 7.2 All bedding and backfill of utility trenches shall be done in accordance with the applicable provisions of Standard Specifications of Public Works Construction. Bedding material shall have a Sand Equivalent greater than 30 (SE>30). The bedding shall be placed to 1 foot over the top of the conduit and densified by jetting. Backfill shall be placed and densified to a minimum of 90 percent of maximum from 1 foot above the top of the conduit to the surface. 7.3 The jetting of the bedding around the conduits shall be observed by the Geotechnical Consultant. 7.4 The Geotechnical Consultant shall test the trench backfill for relative compaction. At least one test should be made for every 300 feet of trench and 2 feet of fill. 7.5 Lift thickness of trench backfill shall not exceed those allowed in the Standard Specifications of Public Works Construction unless the Contractor can demonstrate to the Geotechnical Consultant that the fill lift can be compacted to the minimum relative compaction by his alternative equipment and method. 428 City of Palm Desert Shadow Ridge Project, PP 23-0023/VTTM 38866 SECTION 15183 ANALYSIS TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES APPENDIX 5 429 PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT MAKING A BETTER FUTURE FOR ALL THE COMMUNITIES WE TOUCH Shadow Ridge Road Palm Desert, California 92211 PREPARED FOR: TOLL BROTHERS 350 COMMERCE, SUITE 200 IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92602 HILLMANN PROJECT NUMBER: C3-9749 OCTOBER 4, 2023 430 October 4, 2023 Ms.Aylene Chu Toll Brothers 350 Commerce, Suite 200 Irvine, California 92602 RE:Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Shadow Ridge Road Palm Desert, California 92211 Hillmann Project No:C3-9749 Dear Ms.Aylene Chu: Hillmann Consulting LLC has completed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment at the above referenced site. This assessment was performed in conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM E1527-21, which is the latest version of the E1527 standard published by the ASTM. We appreciate the opportunity to provide environmental consulting services. If you have any questions concerning this report, or if we can assist you in any other matter, please contact our office at (714) 634-9500. Sincerely, Hillmann Consulting LLC Gabriela Cyrulik Ryan Terwilliger Project Manager Regional Manager 431 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 1.1 Executive Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 1.2 Findings, Opinions and Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 1.3 Business Environmental Risks / Non-ASTM Scope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 2.0 GENERAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 2.1 Purpose and Scope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 2.2 Property Location/Legal Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 2.3 Data Gaps . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 2.4 ESA Report Component Dates/Viability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 2.5 User Reliance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 2.6 Significant Assumptions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 2.7 General Limitations and Exceptions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 3.0 USER PROVIDED INFORMATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 3.1 Prior Environmental Reports/Documentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 3.2 User Responsibilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 4.0 RECORDS REVIEW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 4.1 Environmental Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 4.2 Historical Research . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 5.0 INTERVIEWS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 5.1 Interviews with Owners, Operators and Occupants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 5.2 Interviews with State and/or Local Government Officials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 6.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 6.1 Methodology and Limiting Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 6.2 General Site Setting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 6.3 Site Features and Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 7.0 BUSINESS ENVIRONMENTAL RISKS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 7.1 Asbestos-Containing Material (ACM). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 7.2 Lead-Based Paint . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 7.3 Radon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 7.4 Mold/Microbial Damage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 7.5 NWI Mapped Wetlands . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 7.6 Lead in Drinking Water . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 8.0 REFERENCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 APPENDIX A Site Diagram/Vicinity Map APPENDIX B Site Photographs APPENDIX C Questionnaires / User Provided Information APPENDIX D Regulatory Records Documentation APPENDIX E Historical Records Documentation APPENDIX F Other Documents / Lab Results APPENDIX G Project Personnel Qualifications Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Shadow Ridge Road, Palm Desert, California -iii-C3-9749 432 LIST OF ACRONYMS/ABBREVIATIONS Hillmann may use the following abbreviations and acronyms for common terminology described in our report. Not all abbreviations or acronyms may be applicable to this report: AOC -Area of Concern AST -Above Ground Storage Tank ASTM -American Society for Testing Materials BER -Business Environmental Risk CERCLA -Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act CERCLIS -Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Information System CESQG -Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator COC -Chemicals of Concern CORRACTS -Corrective Action Sites CREC -Controlled Recognized Environmental Condition DEC -Department of Environmental Conservation DEP -Department of Environmental Protection DHS -Department of Health Services DNPL -Delisted National Priority List DOB -Department of Buildings DOH -Department of Health DOT -Department of Transportation EPA -Environmental Protection Agency ERNS -Emergency Response Notification System FD -Fire Department FOI/FOIA/FOIL -Freedom of Information / Freedom of Information Act / Freedom of Information Letter HVAC -Heating Ventilation & Air Conditioning HREC -Historical Recognized Environmental Condition IAQ -Indoor Air Quality ISRA -Industrial Site Recovery Act LBP -Lead-Based Paint LCP -Lead-Containing Paint LQG -Large Quantity Generator LTANK -Leaking Storage Tank LUST -Leaking Underground Storage Tank SDS/MSDS -Safety Data Sheet / Material Safety Data Sheet NA -Not Applicable NFA -No Further Action NFRAP -No Further Remedial Actions Planned NPDES -National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NPL -National Priorities List OPRA -Open Public Records Act PAH -Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon PCE -Perchloroethylene RAO -Response Action Outcome RCRA -Resource Conservation and Recovery Act RCRIS -Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System REC -Recognized Environmental Concern SDG -Significant Data Gap SEMS -Superfund Enterprise Management System SRP -Site Remediation Program SQG -Small Quantity Generator SVOC -Semi-Volatile Organic Compound TCE -Trichloroethylene TSDF -Treatment Storage and/or Disposal Facility UST -Underground Storage Tank VEC -Vapor Encroachment Condition VOC -Volatile Organic Compound Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Shadow Ridge Road, Palm Desert, California -1-C3-9749 433 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Executive Summary Hillmann Consulting LLC (Hillmann) has performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) of Shadow Ridge Road, Palm Desert, California (the Subject Property) in accordance with our contracted scope of work and the ASTM Standard Practice E 1527-21 for Phase I Environmental Site Assessments and All Appropriate Inquiries (AAI) Final Rule 40 CFR Part 312. This section contains a summary of findings, opinions and conclusions made by this assessment. However, this section, alone, does not constitute the complete assessment.The report must be read in its entirety. Summary of Project Details Primary Street Address:Shadow Ridge Road City:Palm Desert County:Riverside State:California Tax ID/Parcel Number:694320010; 694290010; 694320011; 694290011 Property Owner:Marriott Ownership Resorts, Inc. Zoning Designation:Planned Residential Approx. Property Area:18.74 Buildings:None Approx. Building Size:NA Approx. Year Built:NA Commercial Occupants:NA Current Use:Undeveloped/Vacant Land, and storage for Marriott's Shadow Ridge and golf course Site Visit Personnel:Ms. Amada Lagunas Site Contact/Company:Aylene Chu /Toll Brothers Site Escort/Company:Unescorted Inspection Date:September 21, 2023 Weather Conditions:82° F /Sunny Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Shadow Ridge Road, Palm Desert, California -2-C3-9749 434 Findings Summary Table Assessment Subject No REC REC CREC HREC SDG Rpt.Ref. Regulatory Records Review:4.1 Historical Records Review:4.2 Bulk Petroleum Storage:6.3 On-Site Operations:6.3 On-Site Haz-Mat Storage/Use/Spills:6.3 Transformers/Hydraulic Systems:6.3 Waste Discharges:6.3 Interviews:5.0 Adjoining/Surrounding Area:4.0 6.2 Prior Env. Reports/User Provided Info:3.0 1.2 Findings, Opinions and Conclusions Recognized Environmental Conditions & Significant Data Gaps Hillmann has performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment in accordance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Practice E 1527-21 of the Subject Property as described in Section 2.2 of this report. Any additions to, exceptions to, or deletions from this practice are also described in Section 2 of this report.This assessment has revealed no recognized environmental conditions (RECs), controlled recognized environmental conditions (CRECs) or significant data gaps (SDGs) in connection with the Subject Property. RECOGNIZED ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS No RECs were identified. CONTROLLED RECOGNIZED ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS No CRECs were identified. SIGNIFICANT DATA GAPS No SDGs were identified. RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the finding of no RECs, CRECs, or SGDs, it is the professional opinion of Hillmann Consulting that no additional environmental actions, remediations, or investigations are warranted. Hillmann Consulting has determined this site to be environmentally suitable for Toll Brothers planned residential development. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Shadow Ridge Road, Palm Desert, California -3-C3-9749 435 Historical Recognized Environmental Conditions (HRECs) If identified,historical recognized environmental conditions (HRECs) in connection with the Subject Property are described below: HISTORICAL RECOGNIZED ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS No HRECs were identified. De Minimis and Other Environmental Conditions If identified,de minimis and other environmental conditions are described below: OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS / DE MINIMIS CONDITIONS The Subject Property appears to be utilized for residential lot purposes. Additionally, the northern portion of the Subject Property is currently used as a golf course and for maintenance storage by Marriott's Shadow Ridge Construction Administration Department. This use will be vacated and the buildings will be demolished in favor of the planned residential for the site. Based on the details provided above, a REC is not suspected in connection with the Subject Property. Environmental Professional Statement I/We declare that, to the best of my professional knowledge and belief, I/we meet the definition of Environmental professional as defined in § 312.10 of 40 C.F.R. 312. I/we have the specific qualifications based on education, training and experience to assess a property of the nature, history and setting of the subject property. I/We have developed and performed all appropriate inquiries in conformance with the standards and practices set forth in 40 C.F.R. Part 312. Ryan Terwilliger Environmental Professional Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Shadow Ridge Road, Palm Desert, California -4-C3-9749 436 1.3 Business Environmental Risks / Non-ASTM Scope Hillmann has performed a limited review of the following potential Business Environmental Risks (BER), also known as “Non-ASTM Scope concerns”, in accordance with the contracted scope of work scope for this assessment. BER is defined by ASTM E1527-21 as “a risk which can have a material environmental or environmentally-driven impact on the business associated with the current or planned use of a parcel of commercial real estate, not necessarily limited to those environmental issues required to be investigated in this practice.” The following is a summary of findings for the limited review of potential BERs, where applicable, as per the contracted scope of work and limitations outlined in Section 2. For a more detailed discussion of the findings and contracted scope of work, please see the referenced report section. Subject Findings Not Appl. Rpt. Ref. Asbestos No buildings were present at the Property.7.1 Lead Paint No residential buildings were present at the Property.7.2 Radon Property is located in the USEPA radon designation Zone 2 or 'moderate risk' area for radon. 7.3 Mold/ Microbial Damage  7.4 NWI Wetlands A review of NWI Wetlands Mapper did not indicate regulated wetland areas on the Property. 7.5 Lead in Drinking Water Potable water service at the Subject Property is provided by a utility connection with Coachella Valley Water District.A recently published water quality report from the utility indicated compliance with USEPA water quality standards for lead in drinking water. 7.6 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Shadow Ridge Road, Palm Desert, California -5-C3-9749 437 2.0 GENERAL 2.1 Purpose and Scope This assessment was conducted utilizing generally accepted Phase I ESA industry standards in accordance with the ASTM Standard Practice E 1527-21. The ASTM describes these methodologies as representing good commercial and customary practice for conducting an environmental site assessment of a parcel of commercial real estate with respect to the range of contaminants within the scope of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) (42 U.S.C. § 9601) and petroleum products. This practice is intended to permit a user to satisfy one of the requirements to qualify for the innocent landowner, contiguous property owner or bona fide prospective purchaser limitations on CERCLA liability (“landowner liability protections,” or “LLPs”): that is, the practice that constitutes all appropriate inquiries into the previous ownership and uses of the Subject Property consistent with good commercial and customary practice as defined at 42 U.S.C. §9601(35) (B). The goal of the processes established by ASTM E1527-21 is to identify recognized environmental conditions in connection with the Subject Property. The term recognized environmental condition (REC) is defined by ASTM E1527-21 as “(1) the presence of hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at the subject property due to a release to the environment; (2) the likely presence of hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at the subject property due to a release or likely release to the environment; or (3) the presence of hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at the subject property under conditions that pose a material threat of a future release to the environment.” The term controlled recognized environmental condition (CREC) is a type of recognized environmental condition and defined by ASTM E1527-21 as a “recognized environmental condition affecting the subject property that has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority or authorities with hazardous substances or petroleum products allowed to remain in place subject to implementation of required controls (for example, activity and use limitations or other property use limitations).” The term historical recognized environmental condition (HREC) is defined as a “previous release of hazardous substances or petroleum products affecting the subject property that has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority or authorities and meeting unrestricted use criteria established by the applicable regulatory authority or authorities without subjecting the subject property to any controls (for example, activity and use limitations or other property use limitations).” The ASTM E1527-21 standard has clarified that a historical recognized environmental condition is not a recognized environmental condition. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Shadow Ridge Road, Palm Desert, California -6-C3-9749 438 The term de minimis condition is defined by the ASTM, “…a condition related to a release that generally does not present a threat to human health or the environment and that generally would not be the subject of an enforcement action if brought to the attention of appropriate governmental agencies.” A condition determined to be a de minimis condition is not REC nor a CREC. The chief components of this assessment are generally described as follows: ▪A non-invasive visual reconnaissance of the Subject Property and adjoining properties in accordance with ASTM guidelines for evidence of RECs. ▪Interviews of past and present owners and occupants and state and local government officials, seeking information related to the potential presence of RECs at the Subject Property. ▪A review of standard physical record sources for available topographic, geologic and groundwater data. ▪A review of standard historical record sources, such as fire insurance maps, city directories, aerial photographs, prior reports and interviews, etc., to determine prior uses of the Subject Property from the present, back to the Subject Property ’s first developed use, or back to 1940, whichever is earlier. ▪A review of standard environmental record sources including federal and state environmental databases, and additional environmental record sources, to identify potential regulatory concerns with the Subject Property, adjoining properties and properties located within the surrounding area. An evaluation of environmental or other regulatory compliance matters is excluded from the scope of this assessment. These methodologies are described as representing good commercial and customary practice for conducting an Environmental Site Assessment of a property for the purpose of identifying recognized environmental conditions. Business Environmental Risks/Non-ASTM Scope Considerations In accordance with our contract agreement, Hillmann may have addressed the following potential environmental subject matters that are outside of the requirements of the ASTM E1527-21 standard: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Shadow Ridge Road, Palm Desert, California -7-C3-9749 439 ▪Asbestos-Containing Materials (ACM):A cursory non-intrusive visual screening for the presence of suspect ACM within the accessed areas of buildings built prior to 1990 on the Subject Property. If the Subject Property contains buildings built in 1990 or later, the contracted scope of work excludes a cursory non-intrusive visual screening or any other level of evaluation for suspect ACM; however, the exclusion for buildings built ≥1990 should not be interpreted to suggest that any such buildings are free of ACM or would not warrant evaluation of building materials for ACM prior to disturbance. It is emphasized that this cursory non-intrusive visual screening does not constitute an asbestos survey/ inspection of the premises. An asbestos survey/inspection should be sought by the report User(s) if a greater certainty is desired regarding ACM and potential asbestos hazards at the Subject Property. Furthermore, a review of regulatory compliance matters pertaining to asbestos is excluded from the scope of work. ▪Lead-Based Paint (LBP):A cursory non-intrusive visual screening of the condition of painted surfaces in the accessed areas of residential buildings/units built prior to 1980 on the Subject Property. If the Subject Property contains buildings built in 1980 or later, the contracted scope of work excludes any cursory non-intrusive visual screening or other level of evaluation for suspect LPB; however, the scope of work exclusion for building built ≥1980 should not be interpreted to suggest that any such buildings are free of LPB or other lead hazards. It is emphasized that this cursory non-intrusive visual screening does not constitute a comprehensive survey for LBP or potential lead hazards. A comprehensive inspection should be sought by the report User(s) if more certainty is desired regarding LBP at the Subject Property. Furthermore, a review of regulatory compliance matters pertaining to lead-based paint is excluded from the scope of work. ▪USEPA Designated Radon Potential:Review of general non-site specific data published by the USEPA regarding the Radon Zone classification for the area of the Subject Property. ▪Mold/Microbial Damage:A cursory non-intrusive visual screening within the accessed areas of buildings on the Subject Property for evidence of systemic microbial problems, including visible mold growth, water damaged building materials or musty odors. It is emphasized that this cursory non-intrusive visual screening does not constitute a comprehensive survey for moisture/mold/microbial damage. A more comprehensive inspection should be sought by the report User(s) if more certainty is desired regarding the potential for moisture/mold/microbial damages at the Subject Property. ▪NWI Wetlands:The Subject Property has been reviewed for jurisdictional wetlands using the National Wetlands Inventory-Wetland Mapper to determine whether mapped federal wetlands have been indicated on the Subject Property. Any further evaluation or legal delineation of regulated wetlands areas is excluded from the scope of work. It is also emphasized that a field delineation of regulated wetlands by a qualified professional Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Shadow Ridge Road, Palm Desert, California -8-C3-9749 440 would be warranted to more fully determine the presence or absence of regulated wetlands at the Subject Property. ▪Lead in Drinking Water:Review of the potential for elevated levels of lead in the drinking water by determining the source of the drinking water supply and a review of available testing or compliance data reports. 2.2 Property Location/Legal Description Property location and legal description details are described as follows: Primary Street Address:Shadow Ridge Road City:Palm Desert County:Riverside State:California Tax ID/Parcel Number:694320010; 694290010; 694320011; 694290011 Approx. Land Area:18.74 Apprx. Latitude/Longitude:North 33.7817210 degrees/West 116.3811460 degrees Additional Details (if appl.)N/A Property Owner:Marriott Ownership Resorts, Inc. Zoning Designation:Planned Residential 2.3 Data Gaps A data gap is defined by the ASTM as a lack of or inability to obtain information required by this practice despite good faith efforts by the environmental professional to gather such information. A data gap is only significant if other information and/or professional experience raises reasonable concerns involving the data gap and the ability to determine the presence or absence of recognized environmental conditions. The following table summarizes data gaps encountered during the assessment as well as a discussion of their significance. Data Gap: Significant (Yes/No)?Discussion Historical records data failure No Records gaps exceeding five years were encountered; however, no significant site use changes are suspected during these intervals. Response to agency records requests not received as of date of report. No Any additional information indicative of a REC will be forwarded upon receipt. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Shadow Ridge Road, Palm Desert, California -9-C3-9749 441 2.4 ESA Report Component Dates/Viability The ASTM E1527-21 standard states that an environmental site assessment (ESA) is presumed to be viable when it is conducted within 180 days prior to the date of acquisition of the Subject Property (or, for transactions not involving an acquisition such as a lease or refinance, the date of the intended transaction). Specifically, all of the following components must be conducted or updated within 180 days prior to the date of acquisition or prior to the date of the transaction. The following table summarizes the component completion dates: ESA Component Completion Date Interviews:September 28, 2023 Env. Lien Search:(excluded from scope) Government Records Review:September 20, 2023 Visual Inspections:September 21, 2023 Env. Professional Declaration:October 4, 2023 2.5 User Reliance This report is for the exclusive use of Toll Brothers and additional relying entities, if any, named on the front cover. No additional individuals or entities shall be permitted to rely upon any data, interpretation, reports or other information or documentation contained in this report, without first obtaining the consent of Toll Brothers; and without obtaining written consent from Hillmann in the form of a reliance agreement/letter. Hillmann may, in its sole discretion, withhold its consent to additional reliance and/or Hillmann may condition consent for reliance upon payment of a fee or other conditions. 2.6 Significant Assumptions The following significant assumptions are made: ▪The site operations at the time of the site visit are assumed to reflect typical site conditions relative to potential environmental conditions and that no concealment of environmental conditions or releases by site owners or occupants has occurred. Likewise, it is assumed that no areas of the Subject Property with potential environmental concerns or RECs were concealed or otherwise not reported, intentionally or unknowingly, by the Subject Property owners/occupants and/or site escort at the time of the site visit. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Shadow Ridge Road, Palm Desert, California -10-C3-9749 442 ▪For the purpose of estimating the approximate direction of groundwater flow in the absence of site-specific groundwater data, unless indicated otherwise, an assumption has been made that the gradient of groundwater flow follows the surface topography of the Subject Property and immediate surrounding area. 2.7 General Limitations and Exceptions Limitations The report turnaround time specified by the contract agreement for this assessment may present a limitation to the availability of pertinent regulatory agency records. Such limitations, if encountered, would be further specified in Section 4.1. Significant limitations related to the condition or accessibility of the Subject Property at the time of the site reconnaissance, if encountered, are reported in Section 6.1. Other Exceptions or Deletions No other exceptions or deletions from the ASTM Standard E 1527-21 are reported. Special Terms and Conditions This Phase I Environmental Site Assessment has been prepared using reasonable efforts in each phase of its work to identify recognized environmental conditions associated with hazardous substances, wastes and petroleum products at the Subject Property.Findings within this report are based on information collected from observations made on the day of the site reconnaissance and from reasonably ascertainable information obtained from governing public agencies and private sources. This report is not definitive and should not be assumed to be a complete or specific definition of the conditions above or below grade.Information in this report is not intended to be used as a construction document and should not be used for demolition, renovation, site development, redevelopment, or other construction purposes.No representation or warranty is made that the past or current operations at the Subject Property are, or have been, in compliance with all applicable federal, state and local laws, regulations and codes. Findings, conclusions and recommendations presented in this report are based on visual observations of the Subject Property, interviews conducted, the records reviewed, information provided by the Client, and/or a review of readily available and supplied drawings and documents. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Shadow Ridge Road, Palm Desert, California -11-C3-9749 443 No warranty or guarantee is made of the accuracy or completeness of information that was obtained from ostensibly knowledgeable individuals, regulatory agency representatives or other secondary sources, including information obtained during the assessment, whether written, graphic or verbal, provided by the Subject Property contact(s) or as shown on any documents reviewed or received from the Subject Property contact, owner or agent, or government agency source. Independent verification of the accuracy or completeness of all information reviewed or received during the course of this assessment is not made and excluded from the scope of work for this assessment. Regardless of the findings stated in this report, Hillmann is not responsible for consequences or conditions arising from facts that were concealed, withheld or not fully disclosed at the time the assessment was conducted. This report does not warrant against future operations or conditions, nor does it warrant against operations or conditions present of a type or at a location not investigated. The regulatory database report provided is based on an evaluation of the data collected and compiled by a contracted data research company.Hillmann can neither warrant nor guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information obtained from the regulatory database report provider during the course of this assessment. Subsurface conditions may differ from the conditions implied by the surface observations and can only be reliably evaluated through intrusive techniques. Reasonable efforts have been made during this assessment to identify aboveground and underground storage tanks and ancillary equipment. Reasonable efforts are limited to information gained from visual observation of largely unobstructed areas, recorded database information held in public record and available information gathered from interviews. Such methods may not identify surficial and subsurface features that may have been hidden from view due to parked automobiles and other vehicles, snow cover, vegetative growth, pavement, construction or debris pile storage or incorrect information from sources. No guarantee, explicit or implied, is made that the records pertaining to historical ownership or occupancy which were reviewed represent a comprehensive or precise delineation of past Property ownership or tenancy for legal purposes. The ASTM E1527-21 standard states that recommendations are not required to be included in a Phase I ESA report; however, further that recommendations are an additional service that may be useful in the User ’s analysis of landowner liability protections or business environmental risks; and that the User should consider whether recommendations for additional inquiries or other services are desired. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Shadow Ridge Road, Palm Desert, California -12-C3-9749 444 Recommended response actions offered in Section 1.3, if any, are provided as an option to the Client, and may have taken into account the Client’s relation to the Subject Property and/or their intended purpose of this assessment. If included, it is not intended by Hillmann to represent the only course(s) of action, or inaction, to take. Furthermore, it is emphasized that additional response actions may become advisable depending on the outcome of the initial action(s) taken. Hillmann advises that Client and any additional authorized relying parties as specified on the report Cover and Section 2.5, or via letter of reliance extension, undertake consultation with legal counsel familiar with environmental and real estate law would be beneficial to the decision making process for the type and timing of a response action to identified RECs or Business Environmental Risks, if any. Due to the limited nature of our review of potential Business Environmental Risks, the User(s) of the report should consider whether to take additional action(s) to further define, properly manage and/or mitigate potential BERs. The User(s) assumes responsibility for business decisions that it makes utilizing information in the report provided by Hillmann. Hillmann shall not be responsible for any conclusions, interpretations and/or decisions of the User(s). In the event of any conflict between the terms and conditions of this report and the terms and conditions of the consulting services agreement for this project, the consulting services agreement shall control. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Shadow Ridge Road, Palm Desert, California -13-C3-9749 445 3.0 USER PROVIDED INFORMATION The term “User ” is defined by ASTM as the party seeking to use Practice E1527 to complete an environmental site assessment of the Subject Property; specifically, the entity or entities named on the front cover to which the report has been addressed. 3.1 Prior Environmental Reports/Documentation Phase I Environmental Site Assessment,APNs: 694-320-010, 694-290-010, 694-320-011, 694-290-011, Shadow Ridge Road, Palm Desert, California 92211; prepared by Hillmann Consulting and dated April 19, 2022. Project Number C3-8984. The Subject Property is utilized as undeveloped residential lots and a maintenance area of the golf course. No Recognized Environmental Conditions (RECs) were identified. No Controlled Recognized Environmental Conditions (CRECs) were identified. No Historical Recognized Environmental Conditions (HRECs) were identified. 3.2 User Responsibilities A User Questionnaire was provided to the User to assist in gathering information, as detailed below, that is required for disclosure during the assessment to meet All Appropriate Inquiry requirements. If completed and returned to Hillmann, a copy of the Questionnaire has been included in Appendix C.A completed questionnaire was not returned to Hillmann. Question:Yes/No:Detail: 1. Search of Land Title and Judicial Records:Has the User performed a search of land title records and judicial records for environmental liens and/or Activity and Use Limitations (AULs) filed or recorded against the Subject Property? NR No Repsonse 1.a. If yes to Question 1:Did the search identify any environmental liens or Activity and Use Limitations (AUL), such as engineering controls, land use restrictions or institutional controls that are in place at the Subject Property and/or have been filed or recorded against the Subject Property under federal, tribal, state or local law? NR Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Shadow Ridge Road, Palm Desert, California -14-C3-9749 446 Question:Yes/No:Detail: 1.b. If yes to Question 1:Has the User provided the result of the search of land title and judicial records to Hillmann? NR 2. Specialized knowledge or experience of the person seeking to qualify for the LLP:Do you have any specialized knowledge or experience related to the Subject Property or nearby properties? For example, are you involved in the same line of business as the current or former occupants of the Subject Property or an adjoining property so that you would have specialized knowledge of the chemicals and processes used by this type of business? NR 3. Relationship of the purchase price to the fair market value of the Subject Property if it were not contaminated:Does the purchase price being paid for this property reasonably reflect the fair market value of the Subject Property? If you conclude that there is a difference, have you considered whether the lower purchase price is because contamination is known or believed to be present at the Subject Property? NR 4. Commonly Known or Reasonably Ascertainable Information:Are you aware of commonly known or reasonably ascertainable information about the Subject Property that would help the environmental professional to identify conditions indicative of releases or threatened releases? For example: 4.a.Do you know the past uses of the Subject Property?NR 4.b.Do you know of specific chemicals that are present or were once present at the Subject Property? NR 4.c.Do you know of spills or other chemical releases that have taken place at the Subject Property? NR 4.d.Do you know of any environmental cleanups that have taken place at the Subject Property? NR 5. The degree of obviousness of the presence or likely presence of contamination at the Subject Property, and the ability to detect the contamination by appropriate investigation:Based on your knowledge and experience related to the Subject Property are there any obvious indicators that point to the presence or likely presence of releases at the Subject Property? NR 6. Litigation, Administrative Proceedings, Government Notices:As the User of this ESA, do you have knowledge of (1) any pending, threatened, or past litigation relevant to hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or from the Subject Property; (2) any pending, threatened, or past administrative proceedings relevant to hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on or from the Subject Property; and (3) any notices from any governmental entity regarding any possible violation of environmental laws or possible liability relating to hazardous substances or petroleum products. NR 7. User ’s Reason/Purpose for Performing Phase I ESA:Residential Development Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Shadow Ridge Road, Palm Desert, California -15-C3-9749 447 4.0 RECORDS REVIEW 4.1 Environmental Information Physical Setting Source Discussion USGS 7.5 minute Topo Map: The Subject Property lies at an elevation of approximately 307 feet above mean sea level. An interpretation of topographic contour lines as well as a review of the EDR Geocheck-General Topographic Gradient suggested terrain sloping downward towards the south-southeast.The closest down gradient water body is a freshwater pond on the adjacent golf course, located approximately 200 feet to the northwest. USDA Soil Data: (EDR GeoCheck) The soil type at the Subject Property is classified as "Myoma".This soil type is described as fine sand with high infiltration rates and somewhat excessively drained. Geologic Data: (EDR GeoCheck) The geologic formation in the vicinity of the Property is described as a stratified sequence of the Cenozoic Era, Quaternary System, and Quaternary Series. Prior Env. Reports: (Section 3.2) Prior environmental reports reviewed as part of this assessment, as detailed in Section 3.1, did not provide additional pertinent detail of physical setting. Additional Sources/ Data: No additional physical setting sources or data was obtained. Groundwater Flow Discussion: Based on a review of the above information as well as observation of the site, the direction of shallow groundwater flow at the site is inferred to bebe towards the south-southeast. Federal, State and Tribal Environmental Record Sources Standard government records were obtained and reviewed primarily via a third-party regulatory database report, titled EDR Radius Map™ Report, prepared by Environmental Data Resources of Shelton, CT. The report provided government records from the standard environmental resources and within minimum search distances specified by Section 8.2.2-Table 2 of the ASTM E1527-21; and were reviewed for the purpose of identifying potential RECs in connection with the Subject Property. Additional detail of the source and significance of the regulatory databases can be found in the regulatory database report in Appendix E. Hillmann has also included discussion of records pertaining to the Subject Property from other government record sources not specifically listed under Table 2, as applicable. Reported distances for adjoining property listings, if applicable, are approximate and indicative of the presence of a public roadway or right-of-way between the adjoining site and Property. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Shadow Ridge Road, Palm Desert, California -16-C3-9749 448 The reported gradients have been estimated based on a number of factors including but not necessarily limited to field observation, review of topographic maps, database listing details and/or site specific geo-technical data. Limited analysis of the details of on-site, adjoining and vicinity database sites was conducted to identify potential sources of sub-surface vapor encroachment. This review was based on elements of the ASTM “Standard Guide for Vapor Encroachment Screening on Property Involved in Real Estate Transactions” (ASTM E 2600-15); and also on elements of “Methodology for Identifying the Area of Concern Around a Property Potentially Impacted by Vapor Migration from Nearby Contaminated Sources” (Buonicore, 2011-S-103-AWMA). Vicinity database sites pertaining to non-petroleum product releases within 1,760 feet of the Subject Property in the up-gradient direction, 365 feet of the Subject Property in the cross gradient direction and 100 feet of the Subject Property in the down gradient direction; and vicinity database sites pertaining to petroleum product releases within 528 feet of the Subject Property in the up-gradient direction, 165 feet of the Subject Property in the cross gradient direction and 100 feet of the Subject Property in the down gradient direction were reviewed to identify active contamination sites with the potential to affect subsurface vapor conditions at the Subject Property. The potential for vapor encroachment was considered in assessing whether or not a REC exists in connection with the Subject Property when reviewing applicable sites within those distances. Regulatory database sites with active petroleum or non-petroleum releases that are considered to constitute a vapor encroachment condition (VEC) to the Subject Property, if any, are identified and discussed in this section. The EDR Radius Map report is attached in Appendix D. Subject Property Listings The following listings of the Subject Property were identified: Name/Address:No Subject Property listings. Database(s): Data Discussion: REC Discussion: VEC Discussion: Adjoining Property Listings The following adjoining property listings were identified. Name/Address:No adjoining property listings. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Shadow Ridge Road, Palm Desert, California -17-C3-9749 449 Database(s): Dist./Dir./Gradient: Data Discussion: REC Discussion: VEC Discussion: Surrounding Area Findings The following is a discussion of non-adjoining sites identified as located within the ASTM specified search distance surrounding the Subject Property. In order to keep this discussion informative and concise, discussion(s) is/are provided of the listed site(s) for each database category that appears most likely to impact the Subject Property based on distance, area topography and/or regulatory status. Listings of sites within the applicable search distances not specifically discussed below were reviewed and concluded not to be RECs in connection with the Subject Property or VECs based on various factors including distance, area topography, known or inferred groundwater flow direction and/or regulatory status. Federal - NPL ASTM Search Distance:1-mile Number of listings within ASTM Search Distance:0 Notable Listing:No listings were identified within the search distance. Dist/Dir/Gradient: Details: REC Discussion: VEC Discussion: Federal - Delisted NPL ASTM Search Distance:1/2-mile Number of listings within ASTM Search Distance:0 Notable Listing:No listings were identified within the search distance. Dist/Dir/Gradient: Details: REC Discussion: VEC Discussion: Federal - SEMS ASTM Search Distance:1/2-mile Number of listings within ASTM Search Distance:0 Notable Listing:No listings were identified within the search distance. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Shadow Ridge Road, Palm Desert, California -18-C3-9749 450 Dist/Dir/Gradient: Details: REC Discussion: VEC Discussion: Federal - SEMS Archive ASTM Search Distance:1/2-mile Number of listings within ASTM Search Distance:0 Notable Listing:No listings were identified within the search distance. Dist/Dir/Gradient: Details: REC Discussion: VEC Discussion: Federal - CORRACTS ASTM Search Distance:1-mile Number of listings within ASTM Search Distance:0 Notable Listing:No listings were identified within the search distance. Dist/Dir/Gradient: Details: REC Discussion: VEC Discussion: Federal - RCRA-TSD ASTM Search Distance:1/2-mile Number of listings within ASTM Search Distance:0 Notable Listing:No listings were identified within the search distance. Dist/Dir/Gradient: Details: REC Discussion: VEC Discussion: State/Tribal - Superfund & Hazardous Waste Sites ASTM Search Distance:1-mile Number of listings within ASTM Search Distance:2 Notable Listing:Palm Elementary/Middle School Dist/Dir/Gradient:1,582 ft / North / Up Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Shadow Ridge Road, Palm Desert, California -19-C3-9749 451 Details:The ENVIROSTOR listing indicated a School Investigation site type,with a "No Action Required" status as of November 23, 2003.A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment was conducted on October 8, 2003,by MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc., and indicated that no recognized environmental conditions (RECs) were found and recommended a no further investigation of the site. REC Discussion:Based on the details provided above, a REC is not suspected in connection with the Subject Property. VEC Discussion:Based on the reviewed data, a VEC is not suspected. State/Tribal - Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal ASTM Search Distance:1/2-mile Number of listings within ASTM Search Distance:0 Notable Listing:No listings were identified within the search distance. Dist/Dir/Gradient: Details: REC Discussion: VEC Discussion: State/Tribal - Leaking Storage Tanks ASTM Search Distance:1/2-mile Number of listings within ASTM Search Distance:0 Notable Listing:No listings were identified within the search distance. Dist/Dir/Gradient: Details: REC Discussion: VEC Discussion: State/Tribal - Voluntary Cleanup Sites ASTM Search Distance:1/2-mile Number of listings within ASTM Search Distance:0 Notable Listing:No listings were identified within the search distance. Dist/Dir/Gradient: Details: REC Discussion: VEC Discussion: State/Tribal - Brownfields ASTM Search Distance:1/2-mile Number of listings within ASTM Search Distance:0 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Shadow Ridge Road, Palm Desert, California -20-C3-9749 452 Notable Listing:No listings were identified within the search distance. Dist/Dir/Gradient: Details: REC Discussion: VEC Discussion: Unmapped/Orphan List Sites Hillmann has also reviewed a list of unmapped sites (a.k.a. “Orphan List” sites) indicated by the database report. Unmapped sites that were identified as falling within an applicable specific search distance or warranting discussion have either been discussed in the preceding tables or are detailed below: Name/Address:None Database(s): Dist./Dir./Gradient: Data Discussion: REC Discussion: VEC Discussion: Additional Environmental Record Sources Requests have been submitted to local, municipal and state agencies for pertinent records pertaining to the Subject Property, particularly with regard to potential environmental concerns such as petroleum storage tanks, storage and usage of hazardous substances and petroleum products, and/or known or suspected environmental contamination. Where applicable, internet research of government environmental regulatory databases was also conducted, as well as a general cursory internet search of the Subject Property address, for information indicative of a REC. The following table summarizes the findings of the research: Source Type of Request Outcome City of Palm Desert FOI request A response was received stating that no records were found. Riverside County Fire Department FOI request No response was received prior to report issuance. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Shadow Ridge Road, Palm Desert, California -21-C3-9749 453 Source Type of Request Outcome CA DTSC Envirostor database (www.envirostor.d tsc.ca.gov/public/) Online search Hillmann searched online for records pertaining to the Property. No records pertaining to the property were found. CA GeoTracker database (geotracker.water boards.ca.gov/) Online search Hillmann searched online for records pertaining to the Property. No records pertaining to the property were found. www.realquest.co m Online search Hillmann reviewed available on-line records pertaining to the Property. No information indicative of a REC was identified. South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) FOI request No response was received prior to report issuance. 4.2 Historical Research Historical records have been compiled and analyzed for historical property information and developing a history of previous uses of the Subject Property, adjoining properties and surrounding area. These records were reviewed for the purpose of identifying the likelihood of past uses having led to RECs in connection with the Subject Property. The historical record sources listed below have been sought with the objective to document past uses of the Subject Property from the present back to the Subject Property’s first developed use, or back to 1940, whichever is earlier. The term “developed use” includes agricultural use, placement of fill dirt and other uses that do not involve structures. Hillmann has sought to review historical records in minimum intervals of five years. Fire Insurance Maps A Certified Sanborn Map Report was obtained from EDR for a review of published historical fire insurance maps for the Subject Property and surrounding area. The following is a summary of site uses and notable details depicted by the available maps: Year(s)Subject Property Adjoining Properties (no coverage) A copy of the Certified Sanborn Map Report is attached in Appendix E. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Shadow Ridge Road, Palm Desert, California -22-C3-9749 454 City Directories An EDR City Directory Abstract report was reviewed for data of prior occupants of the Subject Property ’s street address. The following is a generalized summary of the findings of city directory research for past occupants of the Subject Property. Subject Property Use(s)/Occupant(s)Years Marriott Ownership Resorts Sundt Construction Southern California - 7400 Shadow Ridge Road 2005 The EDR City Directory Abstract report was also reviewed for listings of prior occupants of the adjoining properties. The following is a generalized summary of the findings of city directory research for past occupants of the adjoining properties: Adjoining Property Use(s)/Occupant(s)Years Marriott Shadow Ridge / Marriott Golf Academy - 9002 Shadow Ridge Road 2005, 2010, 2020 A copy of the EDR City Directory report is attached in Appendix E. Historical Topographic Maps Historical topographic maps of the Property and vicinity obtained from an EDR Historical Topographic Map report (as attached in Appendix E) have been reviewed. Additionally, Historical Topographic Maps were reviewed from Historicalaerials.com. The following interpretation of land usage was made by review of the maps: Year(s)Subject Property Adjoining Properties 1904, 1941, 1944, 1947, 1957,1958, 1960, 1964, 1972,1973, 1975, 1977, 1978, 1981, 1982, 1988 The Subject Property is depicted as undeveloped land. The adjoining properties are depicted as undeveloped land. 2012, 2015, 2018, 2021 Shadow Ridge Road is depicted going through the Subject Property. Shadow Ridge Road is depicted going through the north and west adjoining properties.The south and east adjoining properties remain unchanged. If obtained, copies of historical aerial photographs have been included in Appendix E. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Shadow Ridge Road, Palm Desert, California -23-C3-9749 455 Historical Aerial Photographs Historical aerial photographs of the Property and vicinity obtained from an EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package report, as attached in Appendix E, were reviewed. Additionally, Historical Aerial Photographs were reviewed from Historicalaerials.com. The following interpretation of land usage was made by review of the aerial photographs: Year(s)Subject Property Adjoining Properties 1953, 1959, 1965, 1972, 1977, 1979, 1984 The Subject Property appears to be undeveloped land. The adjoining properties and surroundings appear to be undeveloped land. 1996 The Subject Property remains unchanged.Developed roads appear to the north and west. 2002, 2005, 2009, 2012, 2014, 2016, 2018, 2020 A developed road appears going through the Subject Property. The southern portion of the Subject Property appears to remain undeveloped land. The northern portion appears to be developed with a couple of structures or possibly storage containers associated with the golf course and Marriott's Shadow Ridge surrounding the Subject Property. A developed road appears to be going through the north and west adjoining properties. Additionally, the adjoining properties surrounding the Subject Property appear to be a golf course. If obtained, copies of historical aerial photographs have been included in Appendix E. EDR High-Risk Historical Records The EDR Radius Map™ report, which is discussed in greater detail in Section 4.1 and attached in Appendix D,provided a search of proprietary databases of potential historical high-risk uses at or in the vicinity of the Subject Property. These databases include EDR Hist Cleaner – a database of property addresses with records of historical occupancy by suspected cleaners businesses; EDR Hist Auto – a database of property addresses with records of historical occupancy by potential automotive gas/filling stations and repair facilities; and EDR MGP- a proprietary database of sites historically occupied by manufactured gas plants and related facilities. EDR Database On-site Listings Adjoining/Off-site Listings EDR Hist Cleaner: (on-site/adjoining only) None None Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Shadow Ridge Road, Palm Desert, California -24-C3-9749 456 EDR Database On-site Listings Adjoining/Off-site Listings EDR Hist Auto: (on-site/adjoining only) None None EDR MGP: (1-mile distance) None None Petroleum/Natural Gas Well Review The historical record sources and the California Geologic Energy Management Division (CalGEM) online mapping application were reviewed for records of historic petroleum and/or natural gas wells at the Subject Property. No record of any historical petroleum/natural gas wells at or adjoining the Property was identified. Additional Historical Data Where applicable, the following additional pertinent historical data was obtained: Interviews/ Anecdotal: No additional pertinent historical data was obtained. Local Gov ’t Records:No additional pertinent historical data was obtained. Prior Env. Reports:Prior environmental reports reviewed as part of this assessment, as detailed in Section 3.1, did not provide additional pertinent detail of historical site usage. Site Observations:Indications of historic uses of the Property or adjoining properties were not observed during the site reconnaissance. Other Sources:No additional pertinent historical data was obtained. Summary of Identified Historical Uses The following table presents a summary of the types and approximate date ranges of identified prior uses of the Subject Property: Date Range Subject Property Use(s) Unk to 1996 Undeveloped land 2002 to Present Undeveloped land throughout and structures and/or storage containers associated with the golf course and Marriott's Shadow Ridge on the northern portion of the Property. The following table presents a summary of the types of identified prior uses of the adjoining properties: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Shadow Ridge Road, Palm Desert, California -25-C3-9749 457 Date Range Adjoining Property Use(s) Unk to 1996 Undeveloped land 2002 to Present Marriott's Shadow Ridge and golf course Historical Records Data Failure The ASTM E1527-21 standard defines data failure as failure to achieve the historical research objective even after reviewing the standard historical sources that are reasonably ascertainable and likely to be useful. The objective is to identify all obvious uses of the Subject Property from the present, back to the Subject Property ’s first developed use, or back to 1940, whichever is earlier. Furthermore, records of historical use/conditions were sought in intervals no less than approximately five years, unless the Subject Property conditions appear unchanged over a longer interval. In encountered, data failure and its significance as a data gap is discussed below: Objective Met?Detail Significant? First developed use/ date determined? No No indication of any prior use or development of the Property was identified; however, development of the adjoining properties was identified, circa 2000s. No Record sources at 5-year intervals back to 1940 or first developed use? No Historical record gaps exceeding five years were encountered. However, significant site-use changes or undiscovered site uses appear unlikely to have occurred during the record gaps. No All obvious prior uses identified? Yes See Summary of Identified Past Uses of this section. N/A Please refer to Section 2.3 for additional discussion of data gaps and their significance to the findings of the assessment. Historical Uses REC Discussion The review of historical records did not indicate evidence of a REC in connection with the Subject Property. The Subject Property has remained undeveloped land. Several structures and/or storage containers are present on the northern portion of the Subject Property, which could possibly be associated with Marriott's Shadow Ridge and golf course. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Shadow Ridge Road, Palm Desert, California -26-C3-9749 458 5.0 INTERVIEWS 5.1 Interviews with Owners, Operators and Occupants Property Owner Property Owner Contact Name Affiliation Interview Type Date Marriott Ownership Resorts, Inc. Jake Hayward Employee (on behalf of owner) Questionnaire 09/28/23 An environmental questionnaire for information pertinent to the assessment was forwarded via email and completed, as attached in Appendix C. Pertinent information, where applicable, is referenced in the appropriate sections of this report. Key Site Manager/Operator Name Company/Title Yrs @ Site Interview Type Date (none) Occupant(s) Name Company/Title Yrs @ Site Interview Type Date (none) Prior Owners/Operators/Occupant(s) Name Company/Title Yrs @ Site Interview Type Date (none) Neighboring Property Owner(s)/Occupant(s) Name Company/Title Yrs @ Site Interview Type Date (none) The Subject Property was not an abandoned property with evidence of unauthorized uses or uncontrolled access; therefore, interviews with adjoining or nearby property owners or occupants were not conducted. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Shadow Ridge Road, Palm Desert, California -27-C3-9749 459 5.2 Interviews with State and/or Local Government Officials State and/or local governmental officials have been interviewed to obtain information of potential RECs in connection with the Subject Property. Many government agencies and their officials require submittal of written request for records in order to respond. The details in Section 4.1 list the various state and local government agencies contacted as part of this assessment, and the outcome of each inquiry. In addition, the details of regulatory database research in Section 4.1 may have included detail of interviews with officials pertinent to government records review and identification of RECs. Additional interview of government officials not previously detailed in Sections 4.1 are discussed below, if applicable. Name Agency Name/Title Interview Type (none) Interview Outcome/Findings: No additional local/state government officials were interviewed. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Shadow Ridge Road, Palm Desert, California -28-C3-9749 460 6.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE 6.1 Methodology and Limiting Conditions A site reconnaissance was conducted to collect information and make observations to help identify RECs in connection with the Subject Property. This included visual and/or physical observations of the Subject Property and its structures, adjoining properties as viewed from the Subject Property boundaries and the surrounding area based on visual observations from adjoining public thoroughfares and accessed Subject Property structures. Subject property building exteriors were observed at ground level, unless otherwise indicated. Where applicable, building interiors were accessed and observed to the extent they were made safely accessible with the cooperation of the site escort. Site Inspection Personnel: Ms. Amada Lagunas Property Escort/ Company: Unescorted Inspection Date:September 21, 2023 Weather Conditions:82° F /Sunny Significant Inaccessible Areas No significant areas of the Property inaccessible at the time of the inspection were noted. Significant Limiting Site Conditions No significant limiting site conditions were noted at the time of the site reconnaissance. 6.2 General Site Setting Site and Vicinity Characteristics Abutting Roadways:Shadow Ridge Road through the Subject Property Current Property Use:Undeveloped/Vacant Land, and storage for Marriott's Shadow Ridge and golf course Evidence of Past Property Uses: None observed Evidence of Past Adjoining Property Uses: None observed Surrounding Area Uses: Recreational Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Shadow Ridge Road, Palm Desert, California -29-C3-9749 461 Current Adjoining Property Uses Dir Street Address Description N, S, W, E 9002 Shadow Ridge Road Marriott's Shadow Ridge Golf Club W 9003 Shadow Ridge Road Marriott's Shadow Ridge I-The Villages Topographic Characteristics Terrain:Flat to gently sloping Direction of Downward Slope: South-southeast On-site Water Bodies:None observed Other Significant Features: None observed General Description of Structures and Improvements Buildings:None Approx. Building Size:NA Approx. Year Built:NA Number of Stories:NA Subgrade Levels:NA Exterior Ground Cover:Asphalt roads, dirt and sand natural groundcover Ancillary Structures:Two mobile trailers associated with Marriott's Construction Administration Sources of Heating and Cooling: The mobile trailers contained A/C units;two (2) storage containers contained A/C units (likely used as offices) Potable Water/Sewage Disposal: Coachella Valley Water District 6.3 Site Features and Conditions Storage/Usage of Hazardous Substances and Petroleum Products The following approximate number of containers, and general description of their contents, capacity, container types and storage conditions, were observed to be stored and/or used at the Subject Property: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Shadow Ridge Road, Palm Desert, California -30-C3-9749 462 Occupant Substance Qty/Container Type Storage Conditions (none) Bulk Petroleum/Hazardous Material Storage Tanks If identified or suspected, storage tanks for bulk petroleum or hazardous material storage are described as follows: AST/UST Product Capacity Construction Year Installed Status Location/Notes No storage tanks were identified. <<Insert WordBank item>> Strong, Pungent or Noxious Odors and their Sources No strong, pungent or noxious odors were noted at the Subject Property. Standing Surface Water/Pools & Sumps No standing water, pools or sumps containing liquids likely to be hazardous substances or petroleum products were noted. Drums, Totes and Intermediate Bulk Containers No hazardous substance or petroleum product drums were noted. Unidentified Substance Containers No unidentified substance containers suspected of containing hazardous substance or petroleum product were noted. PCBs in Oil Filled Electrical/Hydraulic Equipment No oil-filled electrical or hydraulic equipment was identified at the Subject Property. It is noted that identification of PCB containing fluorescent light ballasts, caulk, paint, or other materials located inside and are part of the building or structure is outside of the scope of the ASTM E1527-21 standard and this assessment. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Shadow Ridge Road, Palm Desert, California -31-C3-9749 463 Stains or Corrosion on Floors, Walls or Ceilings Hillmann was unable to access building interiors to inspect for staining of floors, walls or ceilings. Drains and Sumps No floor drains or sumps were noted at the Subject Property. Pits/Ponds/Lagoons No pits, ponds or lagoons were identified in connection with waste treatment or disposal. Stained Soil, Pavement/Stressed Vegetation No stained soil, pavement or stressed vegetation was observed. Overgrown vegetation was observed on the southern portion of the Subject Property. On-Site Solid Waste Disposal/Fill Material The following evidence of on-site disposal of trash, construction debris, demolition debris or other solid waste was observed: Hillmann observed several soil piles located on the southern portion of the Subject Property. The soil piles appeared to be a mixture of soil and gravel and appears to be associated with Marriott's Shadow Ridge and the golf course.As the gravel piles appear to be standard construction material, the gravel pile does not indicate a REC in connection with the Subject Property. Waste Water No sanitary sewer discharges were identified at the Subject Property. Storm water runoff at the Subject Property is discharged off-site to local streams/drainage systems via overland flow. No additional waste water discharges were identified at the Subject Property. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Shadow Ridge Road, Palm Desert, California -32-C3-9749 464 Septic Systems/Cesspools A septic system was observed in the rear of one of the mobile trailers. No further information was obtained regarding the septic system. Wells No wells (including any dry wells, irrigation wells, injection wells, abandoned wells, or other wells) were identified at the Subject Property. Railroad Spurs No railroad spurs were identified on the Subject Property. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Shadow Ridge Road, Palm Desert, California -33-C3-9749 465 7.0 BUSINESS ENVIRONMENTAL RISKS In accordance with the contract agreement for this assessment, Hillmann has performed cursory reviews of several potential Business Environmental Risks (also known as “Non-Scope Considerations”). The ASTM E1527-21 standard defines the term business environmental risk (BER) as, “a risk which can have a material environmental or environmentally-driven impact on the business associated with the current or planned use of a parcel of commercial real estate, not necessarily limited to those environmental issues required to be investigated in this practice.” 7.1 Asbestos-Containing Material (ACM) The contracted scope of work included a cursory visual screening of the accessed portions of buildings at the Subject Property built prior to 1990 for suspect asbestos containing materials (ACM). The information provided in this section, where applicable, is limited to identification of potential suspect materials in the readily accessible and observed areas of the building, and their general condition. This is not intended to be a comprehensive survey for the presence of ACM, and no testing has been conducted. No buildings built prior to 1990 were present at the Property. 7.2 Lead-Based Paint The contracted scope of work included a cursory visual screening of the condition of painted surfaces in the accessed areas of residential buildings/units built prior to 1980. This is not intended to constitute a comprehensive survey for LBP or potential lead hazards, and no testing has been conducted. No residential buildings were present at the Property. 7.3 Radon Data compiled by the USEPA, as summarized by the regulatory database report, indicated that the Subject Property is located in an area classified as Zone 2 or 'moderate risk'. area for radon.Radon testing was not included in the scope of this assessment. 7.4 Mold/Microbial Damage The contracted scope of work included a cursory visual screening of the accessed areas of the building for evidence of significant damage to building materials and finishes as result of moisture intrusion and/or mold/microbial growth. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Shadow Ridge Road, Palm Desert, California -34-C3-9749 466 Given the absence of building structures at the Property, mold/microbial growth is not considered to be a significant environmental concern. 7.5 NWI Mapped Wetlands The National Wetlands Inventory online Wetland Mapper was reviewed for indications of jurisdictional wetlands at or immediately adjoining the Subject Property. The scope of work for this assessment excluded a visual determination of regulated wetlands at the Subject Property. It is emphasized that, regardless of the data reviewed via the NWI Wetlands Mapper, a field delineation of regulated wetlands by a qualified professional would be warranted to determine the presence or absence of regulated wetlands at the Subject Property. A review of NWI Wetlands Mapper did not indicate regulated wetland areas on the Property. 7.6 Lead in Drinking Water The scope of work for this assessment included a review of the potential for elevated levels of lead in drinking water by determining the source of the drinking water supply and a review of available compliance or testing data.Potable water service at the Subject Property is provided by a utility connection with the Coachella Valley Water District. A recently published water quality report from the utility indicated compliance with USEPA water quality standards for lead in drinking water. A copy of the report has been attached to Appendix F. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Shadow Ridge Road, Palm Desert, California -35-C3-9749 467 8.0 REFERENCES ASTM International, “Designation E1527-21 Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process”; ASTM, West Conshohocken, PA, 2021. ASTM International, “Designation E2600-15-Standard Guide for Vapor Encroachment Screening on Property Involved in Real Estate Transaction”, ASTM, West Conshohocken, PA, 2015. United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), “EPA Map of Radon Zones by U.S. County, EPA 402/F19/004”,www.epa.gov/radon/epa-map-radon-zones, 2019 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service – National Wetlands Inventory, “Wetlands Mapper ”, fwsprimary.wim.usgs.gov/wetlands/apps/wetlands-mapper/2023 Environmental Data Resources Inc. (EDR), “The EDR Radius Map™ Report with GeoCheck®”, EDR, Sheldon, CT, 2023. EDR, “The EDR-City Directory Abstract”, EDR, Sheldon, CT, 2023. EDR, “The EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package”, EDR, Sheldon, CT, 2023. EDR, “Certified Sanborn Map Report”, EDR, Sheldon, CT, 2023. EDR, “EDR Historical Topo Map Report with QuadMatch™”, EDR, Sheldon, CT, 2023. Buonicore A., “Methodology for Identifying the Area of Concern Around a Property Potentially Impacted by Vapor Migration from Nearby Contaminated Sources, Paper 2011-A301-AWMA”, The Buonicore Group, Milford, CT, 2011. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Shadow Ridge Road, Palm Desert, California -36-C3-9749 468 APPENDIX A Site Diagram/Vicinity Map 469 470 471 APPENDIX B Site Photographs 472 1.View of maintenance/storage area utilized by the golf course and Marriott's Shadow Ridge 2.View of maintenance/storage area 3.Maintenance/storage area 4.Rear view of the mobile trailers 5.View of septic system located next to mobile trailers 6.View of the Construction Administration trailer - 7400 Shadow Ridge Road SITE PHOTOGRAPHS Shadow Ridge Road Palm Desert, California Project No.C3-9749 473 7.View of a pad-mounted transformer located at the maintenance/storage area 8.Maintenance/storage area facing north 9.View of the southern portion of the Subject Property 10.View of the Subject Property facing north 11.View of a storage container on the southern portion 12.Golf course to the south and surrounding the Subject Property SITE PHOTOGRAPHS Shadow Ridge Road Palm Desert, California Project No.C3-9749 474 13.View of soil/gravel mounds on the southern portion 14.View of the entrance to the Subject Property 15.Golf course to the east and surrounding the Subject Property 16.Golf course to the west and surrounding the Subject Property SITE PHOTOGRAPHS Shadow Ridge Road Palm Desert, California Project No.C3-9749 475 APPENDIX C Questionnaires / User Provided Information 476 Environmental Health & Safety | Due Diligence & Remediation Management | Construction Services Making a better future for all the communities we touch. www.HillmannConsulting.com PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT APNs: 694-320-010, 694-290-010, 694-320-011, 694-290-011 Shadow Ridge Road Palm Desert, California 92211 Prepared For: Toll Brothers 725 Town and Country Road, Suite 200 Orange, California 92868 April 19, 2022 Hillmann Project Number C3-8984 477 Environmental Health & Safety | Due Diligence & Remediation Management | Construction Services Making a better future for all the communities we touch. www.HillmannConsulting.com April 19, 2022 Ms. Aylene Chu Toll Brothers 725 Town and Country Road, Suite 200 Orange, California 92868 RE: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Shadow Ridge Road Palm Desert, California 92211 Hillmann Project No: C3-8984 Dear Ms. Chu: Hillmann Consulting LLC has completed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment of the above referenced property. This assessment was performed in conformance with our contract agreement and the scope and limitations of ASTM Practice E1527-21, which is the latest version of the E1527 standard published by the ASTM. We appreciate the opportunity to provide environmental due diligence services. If you have any questions concerning this report, or if we can assist you in any other matter, please contact our office at 714-634-9500. Sincerely, Hillmann Consulting, LLC Gabriela Cyrulik Ryan Terwilliger Project Manager Western Operations Manager 478 Hillmann Consulting LLC Phase I Environmental Site Assessment -i- Hillmann Project No. C3-8984 Shadow Ridge Road, Palm Desert, California TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 FINDINGS, OPINIONS, AND CONCLUSIONS ........................................................................ 1 1.1 Summary of Project Details ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Findings Summary Table ............................................................................................................................. 2 1.3 Findings, Opinions and Conclusions ............................................................................................................ 2 1.4 Business Environmental Risks / Non-ASTM Scope .................................................................................... 4 2.0 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Purpose and Scope ....................................................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Property Location/Legal Description ........................................................................................................... 7 2.3 Data Gaps ..................................................................................................................................................... 8 2.4 ESA Report Component Dates/Viability ...................................................................................................... 8 2.5 User Reliance ............................................................................................................................................... 8 2.6 Significant Assumptions .............................................................................................................................. 9 2.7 General Limitations and Exceptions ............................................................................................................ 9 3.0 USER PROVIDED INFORMATION ........................................................................................ 12 3.1 Environmental Lien and Activity and Use Limitation (AUL) Search ........................................................ 12 3.2 Prior Environmental Reports/Documentation ............................................................................................ 12 3.3 User Responsibilities .................................................................................................................................. 12 3.4 User’s Reason for Performing Phase I ESA ............................................................................................... 13 4.0 RECORDS REVIEW ................................................................................................................... 14 4.1 Environmental Information ........................................................................................................................ 14 4.2 Historical Research .................................................................................................................................... 18 5.0 INTERVIEWS .............................................................................................................................. 23 5.1 Interviews with Owners, Operators and Occupants ................................................................................... 23 5.2 Interviews with State and/or Local Government Officials ......................................................................... 24 6.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE ........................................................................................................ 25 6.1 Methodology and Limiting Conditions ...................................................................................................... 25 6.2 General Site Setting .................................................................................................................................... 25 6.3 Site Features and Conditions ...................................................................................................................... 26 7.0 BUSINESS ENVIRONMENTAL RISKS .................................................................................. 29 7.1 Asbestos-Containing Material (ACM) ....................................................................................................... 29 7.2 Lead-Based Paint........................................................................................................................................ 29 7.3 Radon ......................................................................................................................................................... 29 7.4 Mold/Microbial Damage ............................................................................................................................ 29 7.5 NWI Mapped Wetlands .............................................................................................................................. 29 7.6 Lead in Drinking Water .............................................................................................................................. 30 8.0 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................. 31 9.0 APPENDICES .............................................................................................................................. 32 Appendix A Site Diagram/Vicinity Map Appendix B Site Photographs Appendix C Questionnaires / User Provided Information Appendix D Historical Records Documentation Appendix E Regulatory Records Documentation Appendix F Other Documents / Lab Results Appendix G Project Personnel Qualifications 479 Hillmann Consulting LLC Phase I Environmental Site Assessment -ii- Hillmann Project No. C3-8984 Shadow Ridge Road, Palm Desert, California List of Abbreviations/Acronyms Hillmann may use the following abbreviations and acronyms for common terminology described in our report. Not all abbreviations or acronyms may be applicable to this report: ACM – Asbestos Containing Material AOC – Area of Concern AST – Aboveground Storage Tank ASTM – American Society for Testing Materials BER – Business Environmental Risk CEA – Classification Exception Area CERCLA – Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act CERCLIS – Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Information System CESQG – Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator COC – Chemicals of Concern CORRACTS – Corrective Action Sites CREC – Controlled Recognized Environmental Condition DEC – Department of Environmental Conservation DEP – Department of Environmental Protection DHS – Department of Health Services DNPL – Delisted National Priority List DOB – Department of Buildings DOH – Department of Health DOT – Department of Transportation DTSC – Department of Toxic Substances Control ENG – Engineering EPA – Environmental Protection Agency ERNS – Emergency Response Notification System FD – Fire Department FOI/FOIA/FOIL – Freedom of Information / Freedom of Information Act / Freedom of Information Letter HVAC – Heating Ventilation & Air Conditioning HREC – Historic Recognized Environmental Condition IAQ – Indoor Air Quality ISRA – Industrial Site Recovery Act LBP – Lead-Based Paint LCP – Lead-Containing Paint LQG – Large Quantity Generator LTANK – Leaking Storage Tank LUST – Leaking Underground Storage Tank SDS/MSDS – Safety Data Sheet / Material Safety Data Sheet NA – Not Applicable NFA – No Further Action NFRAP – No Further Remedial Actions Planned NPDES – National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NPL – National Priority List OER – Office of Environmental Remediation OPRA – Open Public Records Act PAH – Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon PCE – Perchloroethylene RAO – Response Action Outcome RCRA – Resource Conservation and Recovery Act RCRIS – Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System REC – Recognized Environmental Condition RWQCB – Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD – South Coast Air Quality Management District SDG – Significant Data Gap SEMS – Superfund Enterprise Management System SRP – Site Remediation Program SQG – Small Quantity Generator SVOC – Semi-Volatile Organic Compound TCE – Trichloroethylene TSDF – Treatment Storage and/or Disposal Facility UST – Underground Storage Tank VEC – Vapor Encroachment Condition VOC – Volatile Organic Compound 480 Hillmann Consulting LLC Phase I Environmental Site Assessment -1- Hillmann Project No. C3-8984 Shadow Ridge Road, Palm Desert, California 1.0 FINDINGS, OPINIONS, AND CONCLUSIONS Hillmann Consulting, LLC (Hillmann) performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) of Shadow Ridge Road, Palm Desert, California (the Subject Property). The assessment has been conducted in accordance with our contracted scope of work and the ASTM Standard Practice E1527-21 for Phase I Environmental Site Assessments and All Appropriate Inquiries (AAI) Final Rule 40 CFR Part 312. This section contains a summary of findings, opinions and conclusions made by this assessment. However, this section, alone, does not constitute the complete assessment. The report must be read in its entirety. 1.1 Summary of Project Details Primary Street Address: Shadow Ridge Road City: Palm Desert County: Riverside State: California Tax ID/Parcel Number: 694-320-010, 694-290-010, 694-320-011, 694-290-011 Property Owner: Marriot Ownership Resorts Inc. Zoning Designation: Planned Residential Approx. Property Area: 18.74 acres Buildings: NA Approx. Building Size: NA Approx. Year Built: NA Commercial Occupants: NA Current Use: Golf course / undeveloped land Inspected By: Gabriela Cyrulik Site Contact/Company: Aylene Chu / Toll Brothers Site Escort/Company: Unescorted Inspection Date: April 12, 2022 Weather Conditions: Sunny, 72 degrees F 481 Hillmann Consulting LLC Phase I Environmental Site Assessment -2- Hillmann Project No. C3-8984 Shadow Ridge Road, Palm Desert, California 1.2 Findings Summary Table Assessment Subject No REC REC CREC HREC SDG Rpt. Ref. Property Regulatory Records Review: X 4.3 Property Historical Records Review: X 4.2 Bulk Petroleum Storage: X 6.3 On-Site Operations: X 6.3 On-Site Haz-Mat Storage/Use/Spills: X 6.3 Transformers/Hydraulic Systems: X 6.3 Waste Discharges: X 6.3 Interviews: X 5.0 Adjoining & Nearby Properties: X 4.3 6.2 Prior Env. Reports/User Provided Info: X 3.0 1.3 Findings, Opinions and Conclusions Recognized Environmental Conditions & Significant Data Gaps Hillmann has performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment in accordance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Practice E1527-21 of the Subject Property as described in Section 2.2 of this report. Any additions to, exceptions to, or deletions from this practice are also described in Section 2 of this report. This assessment has revealed the following recognized environmental conditions (RECs), controlled recognized environmental conditions (CRECs) and/or significant data gaps (SDGs) in connection with the Subject Property: RECOGNIZED ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS No RECs were identified. CONTROLLED RECOGNIZED ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS (CRECs) No CRECs were identified. SIGNIFICANT DATA GAPS (SDGs) No SDGs were identified. Historical Recognized Environmental Conditions (HRECs) This assessment has revealed the following historical recognized environmental conditions (HRECs) in connection with the Subject Property: 482 Hillmann Consulting LLC Phase I Environmental Site Assessment -3- Hillmann Project No. C3-8984 Shadow Ridge Road, Palm Desert, California HISTORICAL RECOGNIZED ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS No HRECs were identified. De Minimis and Other Environmental Conditions The following de minimis and other environmental conditions were identified: OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS / DE MINIMIS CONDITIONS The Subject Property is utilized as undeveloped residential lots and a maintenance area for the golf course. Environmental Professional Statement I/We declare that, to the best of my professional knowledge and belief, I/we meet the definition of Environmental professional as defined in § 312.10 of 40 C.F.R. 312. I/we have the specific qualifications based on education, training and experience to assess a property of the nature, history and setting of the subject property. I/We have developed and performed all appropriate inquiries in conformance with the standards and practices set forth in 40 C.F.R. Part 312. _______________________________ Ryan Terwilliger Environmental Professional 483 Hillmann Consulting LLC Phase I Environmental Site Assessment -4- Hillmann Project No. C3-8984 Shadow Ridge Road, Palm Desert, California 1.4 Business Environmental Risks / Non-ASTM Scope Hillmann has performed a limited review of the following potential Business Environmental Risks (BER), also known as “Non-ASTM Scope concerns”, in accordance with the contracted scope of work scope for this assessment. BER is defined by ASTM E1527-21 as “a risk which can have a material environmental or environmentally-driven impact on the business associated with the current or planned use of a parcel of commercial real estate, not necessarily limited to those environmental issues required to be investigated in this practice.” The following is a summary of findings for the limited review of potential BERs, where applicable, as per the contracted scope of work and limitations outlined in Section 2. For a more detailed discussion of the findings and contracted scope of work, please see the referenced report section. BUSINESS ENVIRONMENTAL RISKS / NON-ASTM SCOPE Subject Findings Not Appl. Rpt. Ref. Asbestos X 7.1 Lead Paint X 7.2 Radon Property is located in the USEPA radon designation Zone 2 or 'moderate risk' area for radon. 7.3 Mold / Microbial Damage X 7.4 NWI Wetlands The review did not indicate regulated wetland areas on the Property. 7.5 Lead in Drinking Water Potable water service at the Subject Property is provided by a utility connection with Coachella Valley Water District. No water quality testing data for the on-site potable well was provided by the Property contact. 7.6 484 Hillmann Consulting LLC Phase I Environmental Site Assessment -5- Hillmann Project No. C3-8984 Shadow Ridge Road, Palm Desert, California 2.0 INTRODUCTION 2.1 Purpose and Scope This assessment was conducted utilizing generally accepted Phase I ESA industry standards in accordance with the ASTM Standard Practice E1527-21. The ASTM describes these methodologies as representing good commercial and customary practice in the United States of America for conducting an environmental site assessment of a parcel of commercial real estate with respect to the range of contaminants within the scope of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) (42 U.S.C. § 9601) and petroleum products. As such, this practice is intended to permit a user to satisfy one of the requirements to qualify for the innocent landowner, contiguous property owner or bona fide prospective purchaser limitations on CERCLA liability (hereinafter, the “landowner liability protections,” or “LLPs”): that is, the practice that constitutes all appropriate inquiries into the previous ownership and uses the property consistent with good commercial and customary practice as defined at 42 U.S.C. §9601(35) (B). The goal of the processes established by ASTM E1527-21 is to identify recognized environmental conditions in connection with the Subject Property. The term recognized environmental condition (REC) is defined by ASTM E1527-21 as “(1) the presence of hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at the subject property due to a release to the environment; (2) the likely presence of hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at the subject property due to a release or likely release to the environment; or (3) the presence of hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at the subject property under conditions that pose a material threat of a future release to the environment.” The term controlled recognized environmental condition is a type of recognized environmental condition and defined by ASTM E1527-21 as a “recognized environmental condition affecting the subject property that has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority or authorities with hazardous substances or petroleum products allowed to remain in place subject to implementation of required controls (for example, activity and use limitations or other property use limitations).” The term historical recognized environmental condition is defined as a “previous release of hazardous substances or petroleum products affecting the subject property that has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority or authorities and meeting unrestricted use criteria established by the applicable regulatory authority or authorities without subjecting the subject property to any controls (for example, activity and use limitations or other property use limitations).” The ASTM E1527-21 standard has clarified that a historical recognized environmental condition (HREC) is not a recognized environmental condition (REC). The term de minimis condition is defined by the ASTM, “…a condition related to a release that generally does not present a threat to human health or the environment and that generally would not be the subject of an enforcement action if brought to the attention of appropriate governmental agencies.” A condition determined to be a de minimis condition is not REC nor a CREC. The chief components of this assessment are generally described as follows: 485 Hillmann Consulting LLC Phase I Environmental Site Assessment -6- Hillmann Project No. C3-8984 Shadow Ridge Road, Palm Desert, California • A non-invasive visual reconnaissance of the Subject Property and adjoining properties in accordance with ASTM guidelines for evidence of RECs. • Interviews of past and present owners and occupants and state and local government officials, seeking information related to the potential presence of RECs at the Subject Property. • A review of standard physical record sources for available topographic, geologic and groundwater data. • A review of standard historic record sources, such as fire insurance maps, city directories, aerial photographs, prior reports and interviews, etc., to determine prior uses of the Subject Property from the present, back to the Subject Property’s first developed use, or back to 1940, whichever is earlier. • A review of standard environmental record sources including federal and state environmental databases, and additional environmental record sources, to identify potential regulatory concerns with the Subject Property, adjoining properties and properties located within the surrounding area. An evaluation of environmental or other regulatory compliance matters is excluded from the scope of this assessment. These methodologies are described as representing good commercial and customary practice for conducting an Environmental Site Assessment of a property for the purpose of identifying recognized environmental conditions. Business Environmental Risks/Non-ASTM Scope Considerations In accordance with our contract agreement, Hillmann may have addressed the following potential environmental subject matters that are outside of the requirements of the ASTM E1527-21 standard: Asbestos-Containing Materials (ACM): A cursory non-intrusive visual screening for the presence of suspect ACM within the accessed areas of buildings built prior to 1990 on the Subject Property. If the Subject Property contains buildings built in 1990 or later, the contracted scope of work excludes a cursory non-intrusive visual screening or any other level of evaluation for suspect ACM; however, the exclusion for buildings built ≥1990 should not be interpreted to suggest that any such buildings are free of ACM or would not warrant evaluation of building materials for ACM prior to disturbance. It is emphasized that this cursory non-intrusive visual screening does not constitute an asbestos survey/inspection of the premises. An asbestos survey/inspection should be sought by the report User(s) if a greater certainty is desired regarding ACM and potential asbestos hazards at the Subject Property. Furthermore, a review of regulatory compliance matters pertaining to asbestos is excluded from the scope of work. Lead-Based Paint (LBP): A cursory non-intrusive visual screening of the condition of painted surfaces in the accessed areas of residential buildings/units built prior to 1980 on the Subject Property. If the Property contains buildings built in 1980 or later, the contracted scope of work excludes any cursory non-intrusive visual screening or other level of evaluation for suspect LPB; 486 Hillmann Consulting LLC Phase I Environmental Site Assessment -7- Hillmann Project No. C3-8984 Shadow Ridge Road, Palm Desert, California however, the scope of work exclusion for building built ≥1980 should not be interpreted to suggest that any such buildings are free of LPB or other lead hazards. It is emphasized that this cursory non- intrusive visual screening does not constitute a comprehensive survey for LBP or potential lead hazards. A comprehensive inspection should be sought by the report User(s) if more certainty is desired regarding LBP at the Subject Property. Furthermore, a review of regulatory compliance matters pertaining to lead-based paint is excluded from the scope of work. USEPA Designated Radon Potential: Review of general non-site specific data published by the USEPA regarding the Radon Zone classification for the area of the Subject Property. Mold/Microbial Damage: A cursory non-intrusive visual screening within the accessed areas of buildings on the Subject Property for evidence of systemic microbial problems, including visible mold growth, water damaged building materials or musty odors. It is emphasized that this cursory non-intrusive visual screening does not constitute a comprehensive survey for moisture/mold/microbial damage. A more comprehensive inspection should be sought by the report User(s) if more certainty is desired regarding the potential for moisture/mold/microbial damages at the Subject Property. NWI Wetlands: The Property has been reviewed for jurisdictional wetlands using the National Wetlands Inventory Wetland Mapper (http://wetlandsfws.er.usgs.gov/NWI/download.html) to determine whether mapped federal wetlands have been indicated on the Subject Property. Any further evaluation or legal delineation of regulated wetlands areas is excluded from the scope of work. It is also emphasized that a field delineation of regulated wetlands by a qualified professional would be warranted to more fully determine the presence or absence of regulated wetlands at the Subject Property. Lead in Drinking Water: Review of the potential for elevated levels of lead in the drinking water by determining the source of the drinking water supply and a review of available testing or compliance data reports. 2.2 Property Location/Legal Description Property location and legal description details are described as follows: Primary Street Address: Shadow Ridge Road City: Palm Desert County: Riverside State: California Tax ID/Parcel Number: 694-320-010, 694-290-010, 694-320-011, 694-290-011 Approx. Land Area: 18.74 acres Apprx. Latitude/Longitude: North 33.781496 degrees/West 116.381727 degrees Additional Details (if appl.): NA Property Owner: Marriot Ownership Resorts Inc. 487 Hillmann Consulting LLC Phase I Environmental Site Assessment -8- Hillmann Project No. C3-8984 Shadow Ridge Road, Palm Desert, California Zoning Designation: Planned Residential 2.3 Data Gaps A data gap is defined by the ASTM as a lack of or inability to obtain information required by this practice despite good faith efforts by the environmental professional to gather such information. A data gap is only significant if other information and/or professional experience raises reasonable concerns involving the data gap and the ability to determine the presence or absence of recognized environmental conditions. The following table summarizes data gaps encountered during the assessment as well as a discussion of their significance. Data Gap: Significant (Yes/No)? Discussion Historical records data failure No Record gaps exceeding five years were encountered; however, no significant site use changes are suspected during these intervals. Response to agency records requests not received as of date of report. No Any additional information indicative of a REC will be forwarded upon receipt. 2.4 ESA Report Component Dates/Viability The ASTM E1527-21 standard states that an environmental site assessment (ESA) is presumed to be viable when it is conducted within 180 days prior to the date of acquisition of the subject property (or, for transactions not involving an acquisition such as a lease or refinance, the date of the intended transaction). Specifically, all of the following components must be conducted or updated within 180 days prior to the date of acquisition or prior to the date of the transaction. The following table summarized the component completion dates: ESA Component Completion Date Interviews April 12, 2022 Env Lien Search (excluded from scope) Government Records Review March 29, 2022 Visual Inspections April 12, 2022 Env. Professional Declaration April 19, 2022 2.5 User Reliance This report is for the exclusive use of Toll Brothers and additional relying entities, if any, named on the front cover. No additional individuals or entities shall be permitted to rely upon any data, interpretation, reports or other information or documentation contained in this report, without first obtaining the consent of Toll Brothers; and without obtaining written consent from Hillmann in the form of a reliance agreement/letter. Hillmann may, in its sole discretion, withhold its consent to additional reliance and/or Hillmann may condition consent for reliance upon payment of a fee or other conditions, but in any event, any 488 Hillmann Consulting LLC Phase I Environmental Site Assessment -9- Hillmann Project No. C3-8984 Shadow Ridge Road, Palm Desert, California individual or entity seeking the right to rely must agree to be bound by the provisions of a contract agreement with Hillmann. 2.6 Significant Assumptions The following significant assumptions are made: • The site operations at the time of the site visit are assumed to reflect typical site conditions relative to potential environmental conditions and that no concealment of environmental conditions or releases by site owners or occupants has occurred. Likewise, it is assumed that no areas of the Subject Property with potential environmental concerns or RECs were concealed or otherwise not reported, intentionally or unknowingly, by the Subject Property owners/occupants and/or site escort at the time of the site visit. • For the purpose of estimating the approximate direction of groundwater flow in the absence of site specific groundwater data, unless indicated otherwise, an assumption has been made that the gradient of groundwater flow follows the surface topography of the Subject Property and immediate surrounding area. 2.7 General Limitations and Exceptions Limitations The report turnaround time specified by the contract agreement for this assessment may present a limitation to the availability of pertinent regulatory agency records. Such limitations, if encountered, would be further specified in Section 4.1. Significant limitations related to the condition or accessibility of the Subject Property at the time of the site reconnaissance, if encountered, are reported in Section 6.1. Other Exceptions or Deletions No other exceptions or deletions from the ASTM Standard E1527-21 are reported. Special Terms and Conditions This Phase I Environmental Site Assessment has been prepared using reasonable efforts in each phase of its work to identify recognized environmental conditions associated with hazardous substances, wastes and petroleum products at the Subject Property. Findings within this report are based on information collected from observations made on the day of the site reconnaissance and from reasonably ascertainable information obtained from governing public agencies and private sources. This report is not definitive and should not be assumed to be a complete or specific definition of the conditions above or below grade. Information in this report is not intended to be used as a construction document and should not be used for demolition, renovation, site development, redevelopment, or other construction purposes. No representation or warranty is made that the past 489 Hillmann Consulting LLC Phase I Environmental Site Assessment -10- Hillmann Project No. C3-8984 Shadow Ridge Road, Palm Desert, California or current operations at the Subject Property are, or have been, in compliance with all applicable federal, state and local laws, regulations and codes. Findings, conclusions and recommendations presented in this report are based on visual observations of the Subject Property, interviews conducted, the records reviewed, information provided by the Client, and/or a review of readily available and supplied drawings and documents. Information obtained during the assessment, whether written, graphic or verbal, provided by the Subject Property contact(s) or as shown on any documents reviewed or received from the Subject Property contact, owner or agent, or government agency source; is assumed to be accurate except as specifically stated otherwise in this report. Independent verification of the accuracy or completeness of all information reviewed or received during the course of this assessment is not made and excluded from the scope of work for this assessment. No warranty or guarantee is made of the accuracy or completeness of information that was obtained from ostensibly knowledgeable individuals, regulatory agency representatives or other secondary sources. Regardless of the findings stated in this report, Hillmann is not responsible for consequences or conditions arising from facts that were concealed, withheld or not fully disclosed at the time the assessment was conducted. This report does not warrant against future operations or conditions, nor does it warrant against operations or conditions present of a type or at a location not investigated. The regulatory database report provided is based on an evaluation of the data collected and compiled by a contracted data research company. Hillmann can neither warrant nor guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information obtained from the regulatory database report provider during the course of this assessment. Subsurface conditions may differ from the conditions implied by the surface observations and can only be reliably evaluated through intrusive techniques. Reasonable efforts have been made during this assessment to identify aboveground and underground storage tanks and ancillary equipment. Reasonable efforts are limited to information gained from visual observation of largely unobstructed areas, recorded database information held in public record and available information gathered from interviews. Such methods may not identify surficial and subsurface features that may have been hidden from view due to parked automobiles and other vehicles, snow cover, vegetative growth, pavement, construction or debris pile storage or incorrect information from sources. No guarantee, explicit or implied, is made that the records pertaining to historical ownership or occupancy which were reviewed represent a comprehensive or precise delineation of past Property ownership or tenancy for legal purposes. The ASTM E1527-21 standard states that recommendations are not required to be included in a Phase I ESA report; however, further that recommendations are an additional service that may be useful in the User’s analysis of landowner liability protections or business environmental risks; and that the User should consider whether recommendations for additional inquiries or other services are desired. 490 Hillmann Consulting LLC Phase I Environmental Site Assessment -11- Hillmann Project No. C3-8984 Shadow Ridge Road, Palm Desert, California Recommended response actions offered in Section 1.3, if any, are provided as an option to the Client, and may have taken into account the Client’s relation to the Subject Property and/or their intended purpose of this assessment. If included, it is not intended by Hillmann to represent the only course(s) of action, or inaction, to take. Furthermore, it is emphasized that additional response actions may become advisable depending on the outcome of the initial action(s) taken. Hillmann advises that Client and any additional authorized relying parties as specified on the report Cover and Section 2.5, or via letter of reliance extension, undertake consultation with legal counsel familiar with environmental and real estate law would be beneficial to the decision making process for the type and timing of a response action to identified RECs or Business Environmental Risks, if any. Due to the limited nature of our review of potential Business Environmental Risks, the User(s) of the report should consider whether to take additional action(s) to further define, properly manage and/or mitigate potential BERs. The User(s) assumes responsibility for business decisions that it makes utilizing information in the report provided by Hillmann. Hillmann shall not be responsible for any conclusions, interpretations and/or decisions of the User(s). In the event of any conflict between the terms and conditions of this report and the terms and conditions of the consulting services agreement for this project, the consulting services agreement shall control. 491 Hillmann Consulting LLC Phase I Environmental Site Assessment -12- Hillmann Project No. C3-8984 Shadow Ridge Road, Palm Desert, California 3.0 USER PROVIDED INFORMATION The term “User” is defined by ASTM as the party seeking to use Practice E1527 to complete an environmental site assessment of the Subject Property; specifically, the entity or entities named on the front cover to which the report has been addressed. 3.1 Environmental Lien and Activity and Use Limitation (AUL) Search The User did not provide Hillmann with the results of an environmental lien and AUL search for the subject property. No environmental liens or AULs were indicated by the search. 3.2 Prior Environmental Reports/Documentation No prior environmental reports/documentation were provided. 3.3 User Responsibilities Section 6 of the ASTM E1527-21 standard describes certain tasks required to be performed by the report User in order to qualify for landowner liability protections to CERCLA liability. To assist the report User to meet these requirements, the ASTM E1527-21 standard recommends a questionnaire of inquiries (User Questionnaire) specified in 40 CFR 312.25, 312.28, 312.29, 312.30, and 312.31 be provided to the original report User. Hillmann has been informed by the User that, as a prospective lender, they have declined to complete the User Questionnaire. Question: Yes/No: Detail: Environmental liens that are filed or recorded against the property: Did a search of recorded land title records identify any environmental liens filed or recorded against the property under federal, tribal, state or local law? NR No Response Activity and use limitations that are in place on the property or that have been filed or recorded against the property: Did a search of recorded land title records (or judicial records where appropriate, identify any AULs, such as engineering controls, land use restrictions or institutional controls that are in place at the property and/or have been filed or recorded against the property under federal, tribal, state or local law? NR Specialized knowledge or experience of the person seeking to qualify for the LLP: Do you have any specialized knowledge or experience related to the property or nearby properties? For example, are you involved in the same line of business as the current or former occupants of the property or an adjoining property so that you would have specialized knowledge of the chemicals and processes used by this type of business? NR Relationship of the purchase price to the fair market value of the property if it were not contaminated: Does the purchase price being paid for this property reasonably reflect the fair market value of the property? If you conclude that there is a difference, have you considered whether the lower NR 492 Hillmann Consulting LLC Phase I Environmental Site Assessment -13- Hillmann Project No. C3-8984 Shadow Ridge Road, Palm Desert, California Question: Yes/No: Detail: purchase price is because contamination is known or believed to be present at the property? Commonly Known or Reasonably Ascertainable Information: Are you aware of commonly known or reasonably ascertainable information about the property that would help the environmental professional to identify conditions indicative of releases or threatened releases? For example, -Do you know the past uses of the property? NR -Do you know of specific chemicals that are present or were once present at the property? NR -Do you know of spills or other chemical releases that have taken place at the property? NR -Do you know of any environmental cleanups that have taken place at the property? NR The degree of obviousness of the presence or likely presence of contamination at the property, and the ability to detect the contamination by appropriate investigation: Based on your knowledge and experience related to the property are there any obvious indicators that point to the presence or likely presence of releases at the property? NR Litigation/Administrative Proceedings/Government Notices As the User of this ESA, do you have knowledge of (1) any pending, threatened, or past litigation relevant to hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or from the property; (2) any pending, threatened, or past administrative proceedings relevant to hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on or from the property; and (3) any notices from any governmental entity regarding any possible violation of environmental laws or possible liability relating to hazardous substances or petroleum products. NR NR-no response 3.4 User’s Reason for Performing Phase I ESA The User did not indicate the purpose of the assessment. In accordance with ASTM E1527-13, it is assumed that the Phase I ESA was being performed in order to qualify for landowner liability protection to CERCLA liability. 493 Hillmann Consulting LLC Phase I Environmental Site Assessment -14- Hillmann Project No. C3-8984 Shadow Ridge Road, Palm Desert, California 4.0 RECORDS REVIEW 4.1 Environmental Information Physical Setting Source Discussion USGS 7.5 minute Topographic Map Data: (EDR Geocheck- Physical Setting Source Addendum) The Property lies at an elevation of approximately 307 feet above mean sea level. An interpretation of topographic contour lines as well as a review of the EDR Geocheck- General Topographic Gradient suggested terrain sloping downward towards the south- southeast. The closest down gradient water body is a freshwater pond on the adjacent golf course, located approximately 200 feet to the northwest. USDA SCS Soil Data: (EDR Geocheck-Physical Setting Source Addendum) The soil type at the Subject Property is classified as “Myoma.” This soil type is described as fine sand with high infiltration rates. Geologic Data: (EDR Geocheck-Physical Setting Source Addendum) The geologic formation in the vicinity of the Property is described as a stratified sequence of the Cenozoic Era, Quaternary System, and Quaternary Series. Prior Env. Reports: (Section 3.2) No prior environmental reports were obtained. Additional Sources/ Data: No additional physical setting sources or data was obtained. Groundwater Flow Discussion: Based on a review of the above information as well as observation of the site, the direction of shallow groundwater flow at the site is inferred to be towards the south-southeast. Federal, State and Tribal Environmental Record Sources Standard government records were obtained and reviewed primarily via a third-party regulatory database report, titled EDR Radius Map™ Report, prepared by Environmental Data Resources of Shelton, CT. The report provided government records from the standard environmental resources and within minimum search distances specified by Section 8.2.2-Table 2 of the ASTM E1527-21; and were reviewed for the purpose of identifying potential RECs in connection with the Subject Property. Additional detail of the source and significance of the regulatory databases can be found in the regulatory database report in Appendix E. Hillmann has also included discussion of records pertaining to the Subject Property from other government record sources not specifically listed under Table 2, as applicable. Reported distances for adjoining property listings, if applicable, are approximate and indicative of the presence of a public roadway or right-of-way between the adjoining site and Property. The reported gradients have been estimated based on a number of factors including but not necessarily limited to field observation, review of topographic maps, database listing details and/or site specific geo-technical data. Limited analysis of the details of on-site, adjoining and vicinity database sites was conducted to identify potential sources of sub-surface vapor encroachment. This review was based on elements of the ASTM “Standard Guide for Vapor Encroachment Screening on Property Involved in Real Estate Transactions” (ASTM E 2600-15); and also on elements of “Methodology for Identifying the Area of Concern Around a Property Potentially Impacted by Vapor Migration from Nearby Contaminated Sources” (Buonicore, 2011-S-103-AWMA). Vicinity database sites pertaining to 494 Hillmann Consulting LLC Phase I Environmental Site Assessment -15- Hillmann Project No. C3-8984 Shadow Ridge Road, Palm Desert, California non-petroleum product releases within 1,760 feet of the Subject Property in the up-gradient direction, 365 feet of the Subject Property in the cross gradient direction and 100 feet of the Subject Property in the down gradient direction; and vicinity database sites pertaining to petroleum product releases within 528 feet of the Subject Property in the up-gradient direction, 165 feet of the Subject Property in the cross gradient direction and 100 feet of the Subject Property in the down gradient direction were reviewed to identify active contamination sites with the potential to affect subsurface vapor conditions at the subject property. The potential for vapor encroachment was considered in assessing whether or not a REC exists in connection with the Subject Property when reviewing applicable sites within those distances. Regulatory database sites with active petroleum or non-petroleum releases that are considered to constitute a vapor encroachment condition (VEC) to the Subject Property, if any, are identified and discussed in this section. The EDR Radius Map report is attached in Appendix E. Property Listings The following listings of the Subject Property were identified: Name/Address: None identified Database(s): Data Discussion: REC Discussion: VEC Discussion: Adjoining Property Listings The following adjoining property listings were identified. Name/Address: None identified Database(s): Distance in feet: Direction: Gradient: Data Discussion: REC Discussion: VEC Discussion: Surrounding Area Findings The following is a discussion of non-adjoining sites identified as located within the ASTM specified search distance surrounding the Subject Property. In order to keep this discussion informative and concise, discussion(s) is/are provided of the listed site(s) for each database category that appears most likely to impact the Subject Property based on distance, area topography and/or regulatory status. Listings of sites within the applicable search distances not specifically discussed below were reviewed and concluded not to be RECs in connection with the Subject Property or VECs based on various factors including distance, area topography, known or inferred groundwater flow direction and/or regulatory status. 495 Hillmann Consulting LLC Phase I Environmental Site Assessment -16- Hillmann Project No. C3-8984 Shadow Ridge Road, Palm Desert, California Federal NPL # of sites: 0 Search Distance: 1-mile Notable Listing: None Distance in feet: Direction: Gradient: Data Discussion: REC Discussion: VEC Discussion: Federal Delisted NPL # of sites: 0 Search Distance: 1-mile Notable Listing: None Distance in feet: Direction: Gradient: Data Discussion: REC Discussion: VEC Discussion: Federal SEMS # of sites: 0 Search Distance: ½-mile Notable Listing: None Distance in feet: Direction: Gradient: Data Discussion: REC Discussion: VEC Discussion: Federal SEMS-ARCHIVE # of sites: 0 Search Distance: ½-mile Notable Listing: None Distance in feet: Direction: Gradient: Data Discussion: REC Discussion: VEC Discussion: Federal CORRACTS # of sites: 0 Search Distance: 1-mile Notable Listing: None Distance in feet: Direction: Gradient: Data Discussion: REC Discussion: VEC Discussion: Federal RCRA-TSD # of sites: 0 Search Distance: ½-mile Notable Listing: None Distance in feet: Direction: Gradient: Data Discussion: REC Discussion: VEC Discussion: State/Tribal SUPERFUND & HAZARDOUS WASTE # of sites: 2 Search Distance: 1-mile Notable Listing: Palm Elementary/Middle School / Gerald Ford Dr/Monterey Ave Distance in feet: 511 Direction: N Gradient: Up Data Discussion: The ENVIROSTOR listing indicated the site is on the School Investigation program. A status of “No Action Required” is indicated. No contaminants were found after a Phase I and site 496 Hillmann Consulting LLC Phase I Environmental Site Assessment -17- Hillmann Project No. C3-8984 Shadow Ridge Road, Palm Desert, California inspections. Hillmann reviewed the EnviroStor website which indicated the n o action required determination was provided on 11/21/2003. Based on the findings from the investigation at the site and the distance relative to the Property, a REC is not suspected in connection with the Property. REC Discussion: Based on the details provided above, a REC is not suspected in connection with the Property. VEC Discussion: Based on the available data, a VEC is not suspected. State/Tribal LANDFILL/SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL # of sites: 0 Search Distance: ½-mile Notable Listing: None Distance in feet: Direction: Gradient: Data Discussion: REC Discussion: VEC Discussion: State/Tribal LEAKING STORAGE TANKS # of sites: 0 Search Distance: ½-mile Notable Listing: None Distance in feet: Direction: Gradient: Data Discussion: REC Discussion: VEC Discussion: State/Tribal VOLUNTARY CLEANUP SITES # of sites: 0 Search Distance: ½-mile Notable Listing: None Distance in feet: Direction: Gradient: Data Discussion: REC Discussion: VEC Discussion: State/Tribal BROWNFIELD SITES # of sites: 0 Search Distance: ½-mile Notable Listing: None Distance in feet: Direction: Gradient: Data Discussion: REC Discussion: VEC Discussion: UNMAPPED/ORPHAN LIST SITES Hillmann has also reviewed a list of unmapped sites (a.k.a. “Orphan List” sites) indicated by the database report. Unmapped sites that were identified as falling within an applicable specific search distance or warranting discussion have either been discussed in the preceding tables or are detailed below: Notable Listings: None 497 Hillmann Consulting LLC Phase I Environmental Site Assessment -18- Hillmann Project No. C3-8984 Shadow Ridge Road, Palm Desert, California Additional Environmental Record Sources Requests have been submitted to local, municipal and state agencies for pertinent records pertaining to the Subject Property, particularly with regard to potential environmental concerns such as petroleum storage tanks, storage and usage of hazardous substances and petroleum products, and/or known or suspected environmental contamination. Where applicable, internet research of government environmental regulatory databases was also conducted, as well as a general cursory internet search of the Subject Property address, for information indicative of a REC. The following table summarizes the findings of the research: Source Type of Request Outcome City of Palm Desert FOI request Hillmann searched online for records pertaining to the Property. No records pertaining to the property were found. Riverside County Fire Department FOI request A response was received stating that no records were found. CA DTSC FOI request A response was received stating that no records were found. Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) FOI request No response was received prior to report issuance. South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) FOI request No response was received prior to report issuance. EPA Envirofacts Online search Hillmann searched online for records pertaining to the Property. No records pertaining to the property were found. CA GeoTracker database (geotracker.waterboa rds.ca.gov/) Online search Hillmann searched online for records pertaining to the Property. No records pertaining to the property were found. CA DTSC Envirostor database (www.envirostor.dts c.ca.gov/public/) Online search Hillmann searched online for records pertaining to the Property. No records pertaining to the property were found. CA SWRCB Online search Hillmann searched online for records pertaining to the Property. No records pertaining to the property were found. www.realquest.com Online search Hillmann searched online for records pertaining to the Property. No records pertaining to the property were found. Pertinent records referenced in the above table have been included in Appendix F. 4.2 Historical Research Historical records have been compiled and analyzed for historical property information and developing a history of previous uses of the subject property, adjoining properties and surrounding area. These records were reviewed for the purpose of identifying the likelihood of past uses having led to RECs in connection with the subject property. The historical record sources listed below have been sought with the objective to document past uses of the subject property from the present back to the subject property’s first developed use, or 498 Hillmann Consulting LLC Phase I Environmental Site Assessment -19- Hillmann Project No. C3-8984 Shadow Ridge Road, Palm Desert, California back to 1940, whichever is earlier. The term “developed use” includes agricultural use, placement of fill dirt and other uses that do not involve structures. Hillmann has sought to review historical records in minimum intervals of five years. Fire Insurance Maps A Certified Sanborn Map Report was obtained from EDR for a review of published historic fire insurance maps for the Subject Property and surrounding area. The following is a summary of site uses and notable details depicted by the available maps: Year(s) Prop/Adj Depicted Use(s) Notable Details (No Coverage) Property: Adjoining: A copy of the Certified Sanborn Map Report is attached in Appendix D. City Directories An EDR City Directory Abstract report was reviewed for data of former occupants of the Subject Property’s street address. The following is a generalized summary of the findings of city directory research for past occupants of the Subject Property. Property Use(s) / Occupant(s): Years None identified The EDR City Directory Abstract report was also reviewed for listings of historic occupants of the adjoining properties. The following is a general summary of listings of historic adjoining property occupants: Adjoining Properties Use and/or Occupant(s) Years Marriott’s Shadow Ridge 2005 - 2017 A copy of the EDR City Directory report is attached in Appendix D. Historical Topographic Maps Historical topographic maps of the Property and vicinity obtained from an EDR Historical Topographic Map report (as attached in Appendix D) have been reviewed. The following interpretation of land usage was made by review of the maps: Year(s) Summary 1904, 1941, 1944, 1947, 1958, 1972, 1978, 1981 Property: Undeveloped land Adjoining: Undeveloped land 499 Hillmann Consulting LLC Phase I Environmental Site Assessment -20- Hillmann Project No. C3-8984 Shadow Ridge Road, Palm Desert, California Year(s) Summary 2012 Property: Shadow Ridge Road is depicted through the Property Adjoining: Roads are depicted If obtained, copies of historical topographic maps have been included in Appendix D. Historical Aerial Photographs Historical aerial photographs of the Property and vicinity obtained from an EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package report, as attached in Appendix D, were reviewed. The following interpretation of land usage was made by review of the aerial photographs: Year(s) Summary of Interpretation 1953, 1959, 1965, 1972, 1984 Property: Undeveloped land Adjoining: Undeveloped land 1996 Property: Undeveloped land Adjoining: Roads are depicted to the north and west 2002, 2005, 2009, 2012, 2016 Property: Undeveloped land on the southern portion of the Property; a few structures and/or storage containers to the north associated with the adjoining golf course Adjoining: Marriot’s Shadow Ridge to the west; golf course surrounding the Property If obtained, copies of historical aerial photographs have been included in Appendix D. EDR High-Risk Historical Records The EDR Radius Map™ report, which is discussed in greater detail in Section 4.1 and attached in Appendix E, provided a search of proprietary databases of potential historical high-risk uses at or in the vicinity of the Subject Property. These databases include EDR Historic Cleaners – a database of property addresses with records of historical occupancy by suspected cleaners businesses; EDR Historic Auto – a database of property addresses with records of historical occupancy by potential automotive gas/filling stations and repair facilities; and EDR MGP- a database of sites historically occupied by manufactured gas plants and related facilities. EDR Database On-site Listings: Adjoining/Off-Site Listings Historic Cleaners: (on-site/adjoining only) None None Historic Auto: (on-site/adjoining only) None None MGP: (1-mile distance) None None Petroleum/Natural Gas Well Review The historical record sources and the California Geologic Energy Management Division (CalGEM) online mapping application were reviewed for records of historic petroleum and/or natural gas wells at the Subject Property. No record of any historical petroleum/natural gas wells at or adjoining the Property was identified. 500 Hillmann Consulting LLC Phase I Environmental Site Assessment -21- Hillmann Project No. C3-8984 Shadow Ridge Road, Palm Desert, California Additional Historical Data Where applicable, the following additional pertinent historical data was obtained: Interviews/Anecdotal: No additional pertinent historical data was obtained. Local Gov’t Records: No additional pertinent historical data was obtained. Prior Env. Reports: (Section 3.2) Not applicable; no prior reports were provided. Site Observations: Indications of historic uses of the Property or adjoining properties were not observed during the site reconnaissance. Other Sources: No additional pertinent historical data was obtained. Summary of Identified Historic Uses The following table presents a summary of the types and approximate date ranges of identified prior uses of the Subject Property: Property Date Range Use Unk to 2000s Undeveloped land 2000s to present Maintenance area for Marriott’s Shadow Ridge and golf course The following table presents a summary of the types of identified prior uses of the adjoining properties: Adjoining Properties Date Range Use Unk to 2000s Undeveloped land 2000s to present Marriott’s Shadow Ridge and golf course Historical Records Data Failure The ASTM E1527-21 standard defines data failure as failure to achieve the historical research objective even after reviewing the standard historical sources that are reasonably ascertainable and likely to be useful. The objective is to identify all obvious uses of the property from the present, back to the property’s first developed use, or back to 1940, whichever is earlier. Furthermore, records of historic use/conditions were sought in intervals no less than approximately five years, unless the property conditions appear unchanged over a longer interval. In encountered, data failure and its significance as a data gap is discussed below: Objective Met? Detail Significant? First developed use/date determined? Yes The earliest documented use of the Property was buildings for Marriott’s Shadow Ridge resort circa 2000s. No Record sources at 5-year intervals back to 1940 or first developed use? No Historical record gaps exceeding five years were encountered. However, significant site-use changes or undiscovered site uses appear unlikely to have occurred during the record gaps. No 501 Hillmann Consulting LLC Phase I Environmental Site Assessment -22- Hillmann Project No. C3-8984 Shadow Ridge Road, Palm Desert, California All obvious prior uses identified? Yes See Summary of Identified Past Uses of this section. NA Please refer to Section 2.3 for additional discussion of data gaps and their significance to the findings of the assessment. Historic Uses REC Discussion The review of historical records did not indicate evidence of a REC in connection with the Property. 502 Hillmann Consulting LLC Phase I Environmental Site Assessment -23- Hillmann Project No. C3-8984 Shadow Ridge Road, Palm Desert, California 5.0 INTERVIEWS 5.1 Interviews with Owners, Operators and Occupants Current Owner Property Owner Contact Name Affiliation Interview Type Marriot Ownership Resorts Inc. NA NA Email/questionnaire Interview Date: Interview Outcome/Findings: An environmental questionnaire for information pertinent to the assessment was forwarded to property ownership. However, a completed questionnaire was never received. Key Site Manager/Operator Name Company/Title Yrs @ Site Interview Type NA NA NA Interview Date: Interview Outcome/Findings: Occupant(s) Name Company/Title Yrs @ Site Interview Type NA NA NA Interview Date: Interview Outcome/Findings: Prior Owners/Operators/Occupants Name Company/Title Yrs @ Site Interview Type NA NA Interview Date: Interview Outcome/Findings: 503 Hillmann Consulting LLC Phase I Environmental Site Assessment -24- Hillmann Project No. C3-8984 Shadow Ridge Road, Palm Desert, California No prior owners, operators or occupants were interviewed. Neighboring Property Owner/Occupants Name Company/Title Yrs at site Interview Type NA NA Interview Date: Interview Outcome/Findings: The Property was not an abandoned property with evidence of unauthorized uses or uncontrolled access; therefore, interviews with adjoining or nearby property owners or occupants were not conducted. 5.2 Interviews with State and/or Local Government Officials State and/or local governmental officials have been interviewed to obtain information of potential RECs in connection with the subject property. Many government agencies and their officials require submittal of written request for records in order to respond. The details in Section 4.1 list the various state and local government agencies contacted as part of this assessment, and the outcome of each inquiry. In addition, the details of regulatory database research in Section 4.1 may have included detail of interviews with officials pertinent to government records review and identification of RECs. Additional interview of government officials not previously detailed in Sections 4.1 are discussed below, if applicable. Name Agency Name/Title Interview Type NA NA Interview Outcome/Findings: No additional local/state government officials were interviewed. 504 Hillmann Consulting LLC Phase I Environmental Site Assessment -25- Hillmann Project No. C3-8984 Shadow Ridge Road, Palm Desert, California 6.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE 6.1 Methodology and Limiting Conditions A site reconnaissance was conducted to collect information and make observations to help identify RECs in connection with the subject property. This included visual and/or physical observations of the subject property and its structures, adjoining properties as viewed from the Subject Property boundaries and the surrounding area based on visual observations from adjoining public thoroughfares and accessed subject property structures. Subject property building exteriors were observed at ground level, unless otherwise indicated. Where applicable, building interiors were accessed and observed to the extent they were made safely accessible with the cooperation of the site escort. Site Inspection Personnel: Ms. Gabriela Cyrulik Property Escort/Company: Unescorted Inspection Date: April 12, 2022 Weather Conditions: Sunny, 72 degrees F Significant Inaccessible Areas No significant areas of the Property inaccessible at the time of the inspection were noted. Significant Limiting Site Conditions No significant limiting site conditions were noted at the time of the site reconnaissance. 6.2 General Site Setting Site and Vicinity Characteristics Abutting Roadways: Shadow Ridge Road through the Property Current Property Use: Maintenance area for Marriott’s Shadow Ridge resort Evidence of Past Property Uses: None observed Evidence of Past Adjoining Property Uses: None observed Surrounding Area Uses: Recreational, commercial 505 Hillmann Consulting LLC Phase I Environmental Site Assessment -26- Hillmann Project No. C3-8984 Shadow Ridge Road, Palm Desert, California Current Adjoining Property Uses Dir Street Address Description N NA Marriott’s Shadow Ridge resort W 9002 Shadow Ridge Road Marriott’s Shadow Ridge resort NE 73705 Gerald Ford Dr Golf course S NA Marriott’s Shadow Ridge resort No visual observations indicative of a potential environmental concern were noted on the adjoining properties. Topographic Characteristics Terrain: Flat to gently sloping Direction of Downward Slope: Towards the south-southeast On-site Water Bodies: None observed Other Significant Features: None observed General Description of Structures and Improvements Buildings: NA Approx. Building Size: NA Approx. Year Built: NA Number of Stories: NA Basement/Subgrade Levels: NA Exterior Ground Cover: Asphalt parking lot, grass lawn/landscaping Ancillary Structures: One portable structure for Marriott’s Constructure Administration Sources of Heating & Cooling: No heating or cooling systems were present at the Subject Property. Potable Water/Sewage Disposal: Municipal utility connections 6.3 Site Features and Conditions Storage/Usage of Hazardous Substances and Petroleum Products The following approximate number of containers, and general description of their contents, capacity, container types and storage conditions, were observed to be stored and/or used at the subject property: 506 Hillmann Consulting LLC Phase I Environmental Site Assessment -27- Hillmann Project No. C3-8984 Shadow Ridge Road, Palm Desert, California Occupant Substance Qty/Container Type Storage Conditions (none) Bulk Petroleum/Hazardous Material Storage Tanks The following storage tanks for bulk petroleum or hazardous material storage were identified or reported to be present; or are suspected to be present based on visual observations: AST/ UST Product Capacity Construction Year Installed Status Location/Notes (none) Strong, Pungent or Noxious Odors and their Sources No strong, pungent or noxious odors were noted at the Subject Property. Standing Surface Water/Pools & Sumps No standing water, pools or sumps containing liquids likely to be hazardous substances or petroleum products were noted. Drums, Totes and Intermediate Bulk Containers No hazardous substance or petroleum product drums were noted. Unidentified Substance Containers No unidentified substance containers suspected of containing hazardous substance or petroleum product were noted. PCBs in Oil Filled Electrical/Hydraulic Equipment No oil-filled electrical or hydraulic equipment was identified at the Subject Property. It is noted that identification of PCB containing fluorescent light ballasts, caulk, paint, or other materials located inside and are part of the building or structure is outside of the scope of the ASTM E1527-21 standard and this assessment. Stains or Corrosion on Floors, Walls or Ceilings HIllmann was unable to access building interiors to inspect for staining of floors, walls or ceilings. Drains and Sumps No floor drains or sumps were noted at the Subject Property. 507 Hillmann Consulting LLC Phase I Environmental Site Assessment -28- Hillmann Project No. C3-8984 Shadow Ridge Road, Palm Desert, California Pits/Ponds/Lagoons No pits, ponds or lagoons were identified in connection with waste treatment or disposal. Stained Soil, Pavement/Stressed Vegetation No stained soil, pavement or stressed vegetation was observed. On-Site Solid Waste Disposal/Fill Material No evidence of on-site disposal of trash, construction debris, demolition debris or other solid waste was observed. Waste Water No sanitary sewer discharges were identified at the Subject Property. Storm water runoff at the Subject Property is discharged off-site to local streams/drainage systems via overland flow. No additional waste water discharges were identified at the Subject Property. Septic Systems/Cesspools No septic systems or cesspools were identified at the Subject Property. Wells No wells (including any dry wells, irrigation wells, injection wells, abandoned wells, or other wells) were identified at the Subject Property. Railroad Spurs No railroad spurs were identified on the Subject Property. 508 Hillmann Consulting LLC Phase I Environmental Site Assessment -29- Hillmann Project No. C3-8984 Shadow Ridge Road, Palm Desert, California 7.0 BUSINESS ENVIRONMENTAL RISKS In accordance with the contract agreement for this assessment, Hillmann has performed cursory reviews of several potential Business Environmental Risks (also known as “Non-Scope Considerations”). The ASTM E1527-21 standard defines the term business environmental risk (BER) as, “a risk which can have a material environmental or environmentally-driven impact on the business associated with the current or planned use of a parcel of commercial real estate, not necessarily limited to those environmental issues required to be investigated in this practice.” 7.1 Asbestos-Containing Material (ACM) The contracted scope of work included a cursory visual screening of the accessed portions of buildings at the Subject Property built prior to 1990 for suspect asbestos containing materials (ACM). The information provided in this section, where applicable, is limited to identification of potential suspect materials in the readily accessible and observed areas of the building, and their general condition. This is not intended to be a comprehensive survey for the presence of ACM, and no testing has been conducted. No buildings built prior to 1990 were present at the Property. 7.2 Lead-Based Paint The contracted scope of work included a cursory visual screening of the condition of painted surfaces in the accessed areas of residential buildings/units built prior to 1980. This is not intended to constitute a comprehensive survey for LBP or potential lead hazards, and no testing has been conducted. No residential buildings were present at the Property. 7.3 Radon Data compiled by the USEPA, as summarized by the regulatory database report, indicated that the Subject Property is located in an area classified as Zone 2 or 'moderate risk' area for radon. Radon testing was not included in the scope of this assessment. 7.4 Mold/Microbial Damage The contracted scope of work included a cursory visual screening of the accessed areas of the building for evidence of significant damage to building materials and finishes as result of moisture intrusion and/or mold/microbial growth. Given the absence of building structures at the Property, mold/microbial growth is not considered to be a significant environmental concern. 7.5 NWI Mapped Wetlands The National Wetlands Inventory online Wetland Mapper (https://www.fws.gov/wetlands /data/mapper.html) was reviewed for indications of jurisdictional wetlands at or immediately 509 Hillmann Consulting LLC Phase I Environmental Site Assessment -30- Hillmann Project No. C3-8984 Shadow Ridge Road, Palm Desert, California adjoining the Subject Property. The scope of work for this assessment excluded a visual determination of regulated wetlands at the Subject Property. It is emphasized that, regardless of the data reviewed via the NWI Wetlands Mapper, a field delineation of regulated wetlands by a qualified professional would be warranted to determine the presence or absence of regulated wetlands at the Subject Property. The review did not indicate regulated wetland areas on the Property. 7.6 Lead in Drinking Water The scope of work for this assessment included a review of the potential for elevated levels of lead in drinking water by determining the source of the drinking water supply and a review of available compliance or testing data. Potable water service at the Property is provided by a utility connection with Coachella Valley Water District. No water quality testing data for the on-site potable well was provided by the Property contact. 510 Hillmann Consulting LLC Phase I Environmental Site Assessment -31- Hillmann Project No. C3-8984 Shadow Ridge Road, Palm Desert, California 8.0 REFERENCES ASTM E1527-21-Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process; ASTM International, 2021 ASTM E12600-15-Standard Guide for Vapor Encroachment Screening on Property Involved in Real Estate Transaction, ASTM International, 2015 EDR Radius Map Report, and historical record reports discussed in Section 4, Environmental Data Resources Methodology for Identifying the Area of Concern Around a Property Potentially Impacted by Vapor Migration from Nearby Contaminated Sources; A. Buonicore, 2011 511 Hillmann Consulting LLC Phase I Environmental Site Assessment -32- Hillmann Project No. C3-8984 Shadow Ridge Road, Palm Desert, California 9.0 APPENDICES Appendix A Site Diagram / Vicinity Map Appendix B Site Photographs Appendix C Questionnaires / User Provided Information Appendix D Historical Records Documentation Appendix E Regulatory Records Documentation Appendix F Other Documents / Lab Results Appendix G Project Personnel Qualifications 512 Hillmann Consulting LLC Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Hillmann Project No. C3-8984 Shadow Ridge Road, Palm Desert, California APPENDIX A MAPS / DIAGRAMS 513 Figure 1: Site Vicinity Map N Shadow Ridge Road Palm Desert, California SCALE: (NOT TO SCALE) PROJECT No.: C3-8984 Property 514 Figure 2: Site Diagram N Shadow Ridge Road Palm Desert, California SCALE: (NOT TO SCALE) PROJECT No.: C3-8984 Property 515 Hillmann Consulting LLC Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Hillmann Project No.: C3-8984 Shadow Ridge Road, Palm Desert, California APPENDIX B SITE PHOTOGRAPHS 516 Site Photographs - Page 1 SITE PHOTOGRAPHS View of the southeast corner of the Subject Property View of the southwest corner of the Subject Property Dirt pile on the southern boundary of the Subject Property Dirt pile on the southern boundary of the Subject Property View of the Subject Property facing north View of the Subject Property facing northeast PHASE I ESA - SITE PHOTOGRAPHS Shadow Ridge Road, Palm Desert, California Project No.: C3-8984 517 Site Photographs - Page 2 SITE PHOTOGRAPHS View of the storage units on the Subject Property to the north View of the Subject Property facing south View of the storage containers and other miscellaneous products on the Subject Property to the north View of the storage containers on the Subject Property to the north View of the Subject Property facing northwest Adjoining golf course PHASE I ESA - SITE PHOTOGRAPHS Shadow Ridge Road, Palm Desert, California Project No.: C3-8984 518 Hillmann Consulting LLC Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Hillmann Project No.: C3-8984 Shadow Ridge Road, Palm Desert, California APPENDIX C QUESTIONNAIRES/USER PROVIDED DOCUMENTATION 519 THIS SECTION INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 520 Hillmann Consulting LLC Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Hillmann Project No.: C3-8984 Shadow Ridge Road, Palm Desert, California APPENDIX D HISTORICAL RECORDS DOCUMENTATION 521 The EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package C3-8984 Shadow Ridge Road Palm Desert, CA 92211 Inquiry Number: March 30, 2022 6917909.8 6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor Shelton, CT 06484 Toll Free: 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.com 522 2016 1"=500'Flight Year: 2016 USDA/NAIP 2012 1"=500'Flight Year: 2012 USDA/NAIP 2009 1"=500'Flight Year: 2009 USDA/NAIP 2005 1"=500'Flight Year: 2005 USDA/NAIP 2002 1"=500'Acquisition Date: January 01, 2002 USGS/DOQQ 1996 1"=500'Acquisition Date: January 01, 1996 USGS/DOQQ 1984 1"=500'Flight Date: August 24, 1984 USDA 1972 1"=500'Flight Date: August 17, 1972 USDA 1965 1"=500'Flight Date: August 31, 1965 USGS 1959 1"=500'Flight Date: June 06, 1959 USDA 1953 1"=500'Flight Date: September 19, 1953 USDA EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package 03/30/22 C3-8984 Site Name:Client Name: Hillmann Environmental Co. Shadow Ridge Road 1745 W Orangewood Avenue Palm Desert, CA 92211 Orange, CA 92868-0000 EDR Inquiry #6917909.8 Contact:Alyssa Berry Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR) Aerial Photo Decade Package is a screening tool designed to assist environmental professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDR’s professional researchers provide digitally reproduced historical aerial photographs, and when available, provide one photo per decade. Search Results: Year Scale Details Source When delivered electronically by EDR, the aerial photo images included with this report are for ONE TIME USE ONLY. Further reproduction of these aerial photo images is prohibited without permission from EDR. For more information contact your EDR Account Executive. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2022 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. 6917909 8-page 2 523 6917909.8 2016 = 500'524 6917909.8 2012 = 500'525 6917909.8 2009 = 500'526 6917909.8 2005 = 500'527 6917909.8 2002 = 500'528 6917909.8 1996 = 500' Subject boundary not shown because it exceeds image extent or image is not georeferenced.529 6917909.8 1984 = 500'530 6917909.8 1972 = 500'531 6917909.8 1965 = 500'532 6917909.8 1959 = 500'533 6917909.8 1953 = 500'534 C3-8984 Shadow Ridge Road Palm Desert, CA 92211 Inquiry Number: 6917909.5 March 31, 2022 The EDR-City Directory Image Report 6 Armstrong Road Shelton, CT 06484 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.comEnvironmental Data Resources IncEnvironmental Data Resources IncEnvironmental Data Resources IncEnvironmental Data Resources Inc 535 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION Executive Summary Findings City Directory Images Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction orforecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2020 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. 536 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DESCRIPTION Environmental Data Resources, Inc.’s (EDR) City Directory Report is a screening tool designed to assist environmental professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDR’s City Directory Report includes a search of available city directory data at 5 year intervals. RECORD SOURCES EDR's Digital Archive combines historical directory listings from sources such as Cole Information and Dun & Bradstreet. These standard sources of property information complement and enhance each other to provide a more comprehensive report. EDR is licensed to reproduce certain City Directory works by the copyright holders of those works. The purchaser of this EDR City Directory Report may include it in report(s) delivered to a customer. Reproduction of City Directories without permission of the publisher or licensed vendor may be a violation of copyright. RESEARCH SUMMARY The following research sources were consulted in the preparation of this report. A check mark indicates where information was identified in the source and provided in this report. Year Target Street Cross Street Source 2017 þ þ EDR Digital Archive 2014 þ þ EDR Digital Archive 2010 þ þ EDR Digital Archive 2005 þ ¨EDR Digital Archive 2000 ¨¨Haines Criss-Cross Directory 1995 ¨¨Haines Criss-Cross Directory 1990 ¨¨Haines Criss-Cross Directory 1985 ¨¨Haines Criss-Cross Directory 1980 ¨¨Haines Criss-Cross Directory 1976 ¨¨Haines Criss-Cross Directory 1971 ¨¨Haines Criss-Cross Directory 6917909-5 Page 1 537 FINDINGS TARGET PROPERTY STREET Shadow Ridge Road Palm Desert, CA 92211 Year CD Image Source SHADOW RIDGE RD 2017 pg A2 EDR Digital Archive 2014 pg A4 EDR Digital Archive 2010 pg A6 EDR Digital Archive 2005 pg A7 EDR Digital Archive 2000 -Haines Criss-Cross Directory Street not listed in Source 1995 -Haines Criss-Cross Directory Street not listed in Source 1990 -Haines Criss-Cross Directory Street not listed in Source 1985 -Haines Criss-Cross Directory Street not listed in Source 1980 -Haines Criss-Cross Directory Street not listed in Source 1976 -Haines Criss-Cross Directory Street not listed in Source 1971 -Haines Criss-Cross Directory Street not listed in Source 6917909-5 Page 2 538 FINDINGS CROSS STREETS Year CD Image Source MONTEREY AVE 2017 pg. A1 EDR Digital Archive 2014 pg. A3 EDR Digital Archive 2010 pg. A5 EDR Digital Archive 2005 -EDR Digital Archive Target and Adjoining not listed in Source 2000 -Haines Criss-Cross Directory Target and Adjoining not listed in Source 1995 -Haines Criss-Cross Directory Target and Adjoining not listed in Source 1990 -Haines Criss-Cross Directory Target and Adjoining not listed in Source 1985 -Haines Criss-Cross Directory Street not listed in Source 1980 -Haines Criss-Cross Directory Street not listed in Source 1976 -Haines Criss-Cross Directory Street not listed in Source 1971 -Haines Criss-Cross Directory Street not listed in Source 6917909-5 Page 3 539 City Directory Images 540 - MONTEREY AVE EDR Digital Archive 6917909.5 Page: A1 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 2017 34180 PANERA BREAD 34220 SAMS CLUB VERIZON WIRELESS 34300 FIREHOUSE SUBS DESERT GATEWAY CENTER INTERSTATE BATTERIES STARBUCKS STARBUCKS COFFEE SWISS DONUTS 34340 WELLS FARGO BANK 34380 MATHIS BROTHERS FURNITURE CO 34420 BANK OF AMERICA BANK OF AMERICA FINANCIAL CENTER 34460 DESERT GATEWAY DENTAL GROUP PROLO FAMILY PALM DESERT LLC 34500 AT&T WIFI SERVICES DAVI NAILS FIRSTSIGHT VISION SERVICES HAIRWORKS MCDONALDS REDBOX VERIZON WIRELESS WALMART WALMART SUPERCENTER 34540 DEL TACO 34580 EL RANCHITO TACO SHOP GAMESTOP MATHNASIUM MIRAGE NAILS & SPA SUPERCUTS SZ PROSPERITY INVESTMENTS INC 34620 EL POLLO LOCO 34660 99 CENTS ONLY STORES 34700 MOUNTAIN VIEW TIRE 34740 RENTACENTER 34750 ASHLEY FURNITURE HOMESTORE 34860 AUTOZONE 34900 PETSMART 34940 KOHLS 35900 24 HOUR 7 DAY EMERGENCY LOCKSMITH LOWES 541 - SHADOW RIDGE RD EDR Digital Archive 6917909.5 Page: A2 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 2017 9003 ATM MARRIOTTS SHADOW RIDGE ITHE VILLAG 542 - MONTEREY AVE EDR Digital Archive 6917909.5 Page: A3 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 2014 34220 SAMS CLUB 34260 PHO VU TMOBILE TMOBILE PALM DESERT 34300 INTERSTATE ALL BATTERY CENTER STARBUCKS COFFEE 34340 WELLS FARGO WELLS FARGO BANK 34380 CALIFORNIA PATIO 34420 BANK OF AMERICA 34500 FIRSTSIGHT VISION SERVICES HAIRWORKS VZW AT WALMART 05096 PALM DESERT 34540 DEL TACO 34580 EL RANCHITO TACO SHOP GAMESTOP MATHNASIUM MIRAGE NAILS & SPA SUPERCUTS SZ PROSPERITY INVESTMENTS INC UNITED WIRELESS OF DESERT 34620 EL POLLO LOCO 34700 MOUNTAIN VIEW TIRE 34740 RENTACENTER 34750 ASHLEY FURNITURE HOMESTORE 34900 BANFIELD THE PET HOSPITAL PETSMART PETSMART PET GROOMING 34940 KOHLS 35900 24 HOUR 7 DAY EMERGENCY LOCKSMITH LOWES LOWES HOME IMPROVEMENT 543 - SHADOW RIDGE RD EDR Digital Archive 6917909.5 Page: A4 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 2014 9003 FCTI MARRIOTTS SHADOW RIDGE II THE ENCL 544 - MONTEREY AVE EDR Digital Archive 6917909.5 Page: A5 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 2010 34220 RADIO SHACK KIOSK SAMS CLUB SAMS CLUB BAKERY SAMS CLUB OPTICAL CTR SAMS CLUB PHARMACY SAMS CLUB PHOTO CTR SAMS CLUB TIRE & BATTERY 34260 TMOBILE YELLOW BASKET CHARBROILER 34300 GO WIRELESS QUIZNOS STARBUCKS 34340 WELLS FARGO BANK 34380 PAYLESS SHOE SOURCE 34420 BANK OF AMERICA 34460 DESERT GATEWAY DENTAL GROUP 34500 DA VI NAILS HAIRWORKS JACKSON HEWITT TAX SVC WALMART SUPERCENTER 34540 DEL TACO 34580 GAMESTOP SUPERCUTS 34620 EL POLLO LOCO 34740 ASHLEY FURNITURE HOMESTORE RENTACENTER 34900 PETSMART 34940 KOHLS DEPARTMENT STORE 35900 LOWES 545 - SHADOW RIDGE RD EDR Digital Archive 6917909.5 Page: A6 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 2010 9002 MARRIOTTSHADOW RIDGE 9003 MARRIOTT 546 - SHADOW RIDGE RD EDR Digital Archive 6917909.5 Page: A7 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 2005 7400 MARRIOTT OWNERSHIP RESORTS SUNDT CNSTRSOUTHERN CAL 9000 MARRIOTT VACATION CLUB INTL 9002 MARRIOTT SHADOW RIDGE 9003 MARRIOTT SHDW RIDG MARKETPLACE 547 EDR Historical Topo Map Report Inquiry Number: 6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor Shelton, CT 06484 Toll Free: 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.com with QuadMatch™ C3-8984 Shadow Ridge Road Palm Desert, CA 92211 March 29, 2022 6917909.4 548 EDR Historical Topo Map Report EDR Inquiry # Search Results: P.O.# Project: Maps Provided: Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. page- Coordinates: Latitude: Longitude: UTM Zone: UTM X Meters: UTM Y Meters: Elevation: Contact: Site Name: Client Name: 2018 2015 2012 1978, 1981 1975 1972 1958 1947 1944 1941 1904 03/29/22 C3-8984 Hillmann Environmental Co. Shadow Ridge Road 1745 W Orangewood Avenue Palm Desert, CA 92211 Orange, CA 92868-0000 6917909.4 Alyssa Berry EDR Topographic Map Library has been searched by EDR and maps covering the target property location as provided by Hillmann Environmental Co. were identified for the years listed below. EDR’s Historical Topo Map Report is designed to assist professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDRs Historical Topo Map Report includes a search of a collection of public and private color historical topographic maps, dating back to the late 1800s. NA 33.781496 33° 46' 53" North C3-8984 -116.381727 -116° 22' 54" West Zone 11 North 557242.37 3738100.85 307.55' above sea level This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2022 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. 6917909 4 2 549 page Topo Sheet Key This EDR Topo Map Report is based upon the following USGS topographic map sheets. - 2018 Source Sheets 2018 Cathedral City 7.5-minute, 24000 2018 Myoma 7.5-minute, 24000 2015 Source Sheets 2015 Cathedral City 7.5-minute, 24000 2015 Myoma 7.5-minute, 24000 2012 Source Sheets 2012 Cathedral City 7.5-minute, 24000 2012 Myoma 7.5-minute, 24000 1978, 1981 Source Sheets 1978 Myoma 7.5-minute, 24000 Aerial Photo Revised 1972 1981 Cathedral City 7.5-minute, 24000 Aerial Photo Revised 1978 6917909 4 3 550 page Topo Sheet Key This EDR Topo Map Report is based upon the following USGS topographic map sheets. - 1975 Source Sheets 1975 Cathedral City 7.5-minute, 24000 Aerial Photo Revised 1975 1972 Source Sheets 1972 Myoma 7.5-minute, 24000 Aerial Photo Revised 1972 1972 Cathedral City 7.5-minute, 24000 Aerial Photo Revised 1972 1958 Source Sheets 1958 Cathedral City 7.5-minute, 24000 Aerial Photo Revised 1956 1958 Myoma 7.5-minute, 24000 Aerial Photo Revised 1956 1947 Source Sheets 1947 THOUSAND PALMS 15-minute, 50000 6917909 4 4 551 page Topo Sheet Key This EDR Topo Map Report is based upon the following USGS topographic map sheets. - 1944 Source Sheets 1944 Edom 15-minute, 62500 Aerial Photo Revised 1941 1941 Source Sheets 1941 Edom 15-minute, 62500 Aerial Photo Revised 1941 1904 Source Sheets 1904 Indio 30-minute, 125000 6917909 4 5 552 Historical Topo Map page SITE NAME: ADDRESS: CLIENT: This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). - EW SW S SE NW N NE 2018 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 C3-8984 Shadow Ridge Road Palm Desert, CA 92211 Hillmann Environmental Co. TP, Cathedral City, 2018, 7.5-minute NE, Myoma, 2018, 7.5-minute 6917909 4 6 553 Historical Topo Map page SITE NAME: ADDRESS: CLIENT: This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). - EW SW S SE NW N NE 2015 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 C3-8984 Shadow Ridge Road Palm Desert, CA 92211 Hillmann Environmental Co. TP, Cathedral City, 2015, 7.5-minute NE, Myoma, 2015, 7.5-minute 6917909 4 7 554 Historical Topo Map page SITE NAME: ADDRESS: CLIENT: This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). - EW SW S SE NW N NE 2012 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 C3-8984 Shadow Ridge Road Palm Desert, CA 92211 Hillmann Environmental Co. TP, Cathedral City, 2012, 7.5-minute NE, Myoma, 2012, 7.5-minute 6917909 4 8 555 Historical Topo Map page SITE NAME: ADDRESS: CLIENT: This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). - EW SW S SE NW N NE 1978, 1981 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 C3-8984 Shadow Ridge Road Palm Desert, CA 92211 Hillmann Environmental Co. TP, Cathedral City, 1981, 7.5-minute NE, Myoma, 1978, 7.5-minute 6917909 4 9 556 Historical Topo Map page SITE NAME: ADDRESS: CLIENT: This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). - EW SW S SE NW N NE 1975 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 C3-8984 Shadow Ridge Road Palm Desert, CA 92211 Hillmann Environmental Co. TP, Cathedral City, 1975, 7.5-minute 6917909 4 10 557 Historical Topo Map page SITE NAME: ADDRESS: CLIENT: This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). - EW SW S SE NW N NE 1972 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 C3-8984 Shadow Ridge Road Palm Desert, CA 92211 Hillmann Environmental Co. TP, Cathedral City, 1972, 7.5-minute NE, Myoma, 1972, 7.5-minute 6917909 4 11 558 Historical Topo Map page SITE NAME: ADDRESS: CLIENT: This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). - EW SW S SE NW N NE 1958 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 C3-8984 Shadow Ridge Road Palm Desert, CA 92211 Hillmann Environmental Co. TP, Cathedral City, 1958, 7.5-minute NE, Myoma, 1958, 7.5-minute 6917909 4 12 559 Historical Topo Map page SITE NAME: ADDRESS: CLIENT: This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). - EW SW S SE NW N NE 1947 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 C3-8984 Shadow Ridge Road Palm Desert, CA 92211 Hillmann Environmental Co. TP, THOUSAND PALMS, 1947, 15-minute 6917909 4 13 560 Historical Topo Map page SITE NAME: ADDRESS: CLIENT: This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). - EW SW S SE NW N NE 1944 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 C3-8984 Shadow Ridge Road Palm Desert, CA 92211 Hillmann Environmental Co. TP, Edom, 1944, 15-minute 6917909 4 14 561 Historical Topo Map page SITE NAME: ADDRESS: CLIENT: This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). - EW SW S SE NW N NE 1941 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 C3-8984 Shadow Ridge Road Palm Desert, CA 92211 Hillmann Environmental Co. TP, Edom, 1941, 15-minute 6917909 4 15 562 Historical Topo Map page SITE NAME: ADDRESS: CLIENT: This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). - EW SW S SE NW N NE 1904 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 C3-8984 Shadow Ridge Road Palm Desert, CA 92211 Hillmann Environmental Co. TP, Indio, 1904, 30-minute 6917909 4 16 563 Certified Sanborn® Map Report Inquiry Number: 6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor Shelton, CT 06484 Toll Free: 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.com C3-8984 Shadow Ridge Road Palm Desert, CA 92211 March 29, 2022 6917909.3 564 Certified Sanborn® Map Report Certified Sanborn Results: Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. page- The Sanborn Library includes more than 1.2 million fire insurance maps from Sanborn, Bromley, Perris & Browne, Hopkins, Barlow and others which track historical property usage in approximately 12,000 American cities and towns. Collections searched: Library of Congress University Publications of America EDR Private Collection The Sanborn Library LLC Since 1866™ Limited Permission To Make Copies Sanborn® Library search results Contact:EDR Inquiry # Site Name: Client Name: Certification # PO # Project 03/29/22 Shadow Ridge Road C3-8984 Hillmann Environmental Co. 1745 W Orangewood Avenue Palm Desert, CA 92211 6917909.3 Orange, CA 92868-0000 Alyssa Berry The Sanborn Library has been searched by EDR and maps covering the target property location as provided by Hillmann Environmental Co. were identified for the years listed below. The Sanborn Library is the largest, most complete collection of fire insurance maps. The collection includes maps from Sanborn, Bromley, Perris & Browne, Hopkins, Barlow, and others. Only Environmental Data Resources Inc. (EDR) is authorized to grant rights for commercial reproduction of maps by the Sanborn Library LLC, the copyright holder for the collection. Results can be authenticated by visiting www.edrnet.com/sanborn. The Sanborn Library is continually enhanced with newly identified map archives. This report accesses all maps in the collection as of the day this report was generated. 9DFB-4154-8A75 NA UNMAPPED PROPERTY C3-8984 This report certifies that the complete holdings of the Sanborn Library, LLC collection have been searched based on client supplied target property information, and fire insurance maps covering the target property were not found. Certification #: 9DFB-4154-8A75 Hillmann Environmental Co. (the client) is permitted to make up to FIVE photocopies of this Sanborn Map transmittal and each fire insurance map accompanying this report solely for the limited use of its customer. No one other than the client is authorized to make copies. Upon request made directly to an EDR Account Executive, the client may be permitted to make a limited number of additional photocopies. This permission is conditioned upon compliance by the client, its customer and their agents with EDR's copyright policy; a copy of which is available upon request. This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2022 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. 6917909 3 2 565 Hillmann Consulting LLC Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Hillmann Project No.: C3-8984 Shadow Ridge Road, Palm Desert, California APPENDIX E REGULATORY RECORDS DOCUMENTATION 566 FORM-LBC-CCA ®kcehCoeG htiw tropeR ™paM suidaR RDE ehT 6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor Shelton, CT 06484 Toll Free: 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.com C3-8984 Shadow Ridge Road Palm Desert, CA 92211 Inquiry Number: 06917909.2r March 29, 2022 567 SECTION PAGE Executive Summary ES1 Overview Map 2 Detail Map 3 Map Findings Summary 4 Map Findings 9 Orphan Summary 24 Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking GR-1 GEOCHECK ADDENDUM Physical Setting Source Addendum A-1 Physical Setting Source Summary A-2 Physical Setting SSURGO Soil Map A-5 Physical Setting Source Map A-8 Physical Setting Source Map Findings A-10 Physical Setting Source Records Searched PSGR-1 TC06917909.2r Page 1 Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2020 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. TABLE OF CONTENTS 568 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC06917909.2r EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR). The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA’s Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments (E1527-21), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments for Forestland or Rural Property (E 2247-16), the ASTM Standard Practice for Limited Environmental Due Diligence: Transaction Screen Process (E 1528-14) or custom requirements developed for the evaluation of environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate. TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION ADDRESS SHADOW RIDGE ROAD PALM DESERT, CA 92211 COORDINATES 33.7814960 - 33ˆ 46’ 53.38’’Latitude (North): 116.3817270 - 116ˆ 22’ 54.21’’Longitude (West): Zone 11Universal Tranverse Mercator: 557243.7UTM X (Meters): 3737907.0UTM Y (Meters): 307 ft. above sea levelElevation: USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY 12002826 CATHEDRAL CITY, CATarget Property Map: 2018Version Date: 12002866 MYOMA, CANortheast Map: 2018Version Date: AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY IN THIS REPORT 20140521, 20140519Portions of Photo from: USDASource: 569 06917909.2r Page 2 6 UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHO GERALD FORD DRIVE/PO ENVIROSTOR, SCH Lower 4089, 0.774, ENE 5 PALM ELEMENTARY/MIDD GERALD FORD DRIVE/MO ENVIROSTOR, SCH Lower 1563, 0.296, NNE A4 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, 73705 GERALD FORD DR RCRA NonGen / NLR Lower 946, 0.179, NNE A3 PALM DESERT SHERIFFS 73705 GERALD FORD DR CERS TANKS, CERS Lower 946, 0.179, NNE A2 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE 73705 GERALD FORD DR AST Lower 946, 0.179, NNE A1 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE 73705 GERALD FORD DR CERS TANKS, CERS Lower 946, 0.179, NNE MAPPED SITES SUMMARY Target Property Address: SHADOW RIDGE ROAD PALM DESERT, CA 92211 Click on Map ID to see full detail. MAP RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.) ID DATABASE ACRONYMS ELEVATION DIRECTIONSITE NAME ADDRESS 570 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC06917909.2r EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS The target property was not listed in any of the databases searched by EDR. DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES No mapped sites were found in EDR’s search of available ("reasonably ascertainable ") government records either on the target property or within the search radius around the target property for the following databases: STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Lists of Federal NPL (Superfund) sites NPL National Priority List Proposed NPL Proposed National Priority List Sites NPL LIENS Federal Superfund Liens Lists of Federal Delisted NPL sites Delisted NPL National Priority List Deletions Lists of Federal sites subject to CERCLA removals and CERCLA orders FEDERAL FACILITY Federal Facility Site Information listing SEMS Superfund Enterprise Management System Lists of Federal CERCLA sites with NFRAP SEMS-ARCHIVE Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive Lists of Federal RCRA facilities undergoing Corrective Action CORRACTS Corrective Action Report Lists of Federal RCRA TSD facilities RCRA-TSDF RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal Lists of Federal RCRA generators RCRA-LQG RCRA - Large Quantity Generators RCRA-SQG RCRA - Small Quantity Generators RCRA-VSQG RCRA - Very Small Quantity Generators (Formerly Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators) Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries LUCIS Land Use Control Information System 571 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC06917909.2r EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 US ENG CONTROLS Engineering Controls Sites List US INST CONTROLS Institutional Controls Sites List Federal ERNS list ERNS Emergency Response Notification System Lists of state- and tribal (Superfund) equivalent sites RESPONSE State Response Sites Lists of state and tribal landfills and solid waste disposal facilities SWF/LF Solid Waste Information System Lists of state and tribal leaking storage tanks LUST Geotracker’s Leaking Underground Fuel Tank Report INDIAN LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land CPS-SLIC Statewide SLIC Cases Lists of state and tribal registered storage tanks FEMA UST Underground Storage Tank Listing UST Active UST Facilities INDIAN UST Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land Lists of state and tribal voluntary cleanup sites VCP Voluntary Cleanup Program Properties INDIAN VCP Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing Lists of state and tribal brownfield sites BROWNFIELDS Considered Brownfieds Sites Listing ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists US BROWNFIELDS A Listing of Brownfields Sites Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites WMUDS/SWAT Waste Management Unit Database SWRCY Recycler Database HAULERS Registered Waste Tire Haulers Listing INDIAN ODI Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands DEBRIS REGION 9 Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations ODI Open Dump Inventory IHS OPEN DUMPS Open Dumps on Indian Land Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites US HIST CDL Delisted National Clandestine Laboratory Register 572 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC06917909.2r EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 HIST Cal-Sites Historical Calsites Database SCH School Property Evaluation Program CDL Clandestine Drug Labs CERS HAZ WASTE CERS HAZ WASTE Toxic Pits Toxic Pits Cleanup Act Sites US CDL National Clandestine Laboratory Register PFAS PFAS Contamination Site Location Listing AQUEOUS FOAM Former Fire Training Facility Assessments Listing Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks SWEEPS UST SWEEPS UST Listing HIST UST Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database CA FID UST Facility Inventory Database Local Land Records LIENS Environmental Liens Listing LIENS 2 CERCLA Lien Information DEED Deed Restriction Listing Records of Emergency Release Reports HMIRS Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System CHMIRS California Hazardous Material Incident Report System LDS Land Disposal Sites Listing MCS Military Cleanup Sites Listing SPILLS 90 SPILLS 90 data from FirstSearch Other Ascertainable Records FUDS Formerly Used Defense Sites DOD Department of Defense Sites SCRD DRYCLEANERS State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing US FIN ASSUR Financial Assurance Information EPA WATCH LIST EPA WATCH LIST 2020 COR ACTION 2020 Corrective Action Program List TSCA Toxic Substances Control Act TRIS Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System SSTS Section 7 Tracking Systems ROD Records Of Decision RMP Risk Management Plans RAATS RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System PRP Potentially Responsible Parties PADS PCB Activity Database System ICIS Integrated Compliance Information System FTTS FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) MLTS Material Licensing Tracking System COAL ASH DOE Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data COAL ASH EPA Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List PCB TRANSFORMER PCB Transformer Registration Database RADINFO Radiation Information Database HIST FTTS FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing DOT OPS Incident and Accident Data 573 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC06917909.2r EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 CONSENT Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees INDIAN RESERV Indian Reservations FUSRAP Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program UMTRA Uranium Mill Tailings Sites LEAD SMELTERS Lead Smelter Sites US AIRS Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem US MINES Mines Master Index File ABANDONED MINES Abandoned Mines FINDS Facility Index System/Facility Registry System UXO Unexploded Ordnance Sites DOCKET HWC Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing ECHO Enforcement & Compliance History Information FUELS PROGRAM EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing CA BOND EXP. PLAN Bond Expenditure Plan Cortese "Cortese" Hazardous Waste & Substances Sites List CUPA Listings CUPA Resources List DRYCLEANERS Cleaner Facilities EMI Emissions Inventory Data ENF Enforcement Action Listing Financial Assurance Financial Assurance Information Listing HAZNET Facility and Manifest Data ICE ICE HIST CORTESE Hazardous Waste & Substance Site List HWP EnviroStor Permitted Facilities Listing HWT Registered Hazardous Waste Transporter Database MINES Mines Site Location Listing MWMP Medical Waste Management Program Listing NPDES NPDES Permits Listing PEST LIC Pesticide Regulation Licenses Listing PROC Certified Processors Database Notify 65 Proposition 65 Records UIC UIC Listing UIC GEO UIC GEO (GEOTRACKER) WASTEWATER PITS Oil Wastewater Pits Listing WDS Waste Discharge System WIP Well Investigation Program Case List MILITARY PRIV SITES MILITARY PRIV SITES (GEOTRACKER) PROJECT PROJECT (GEOTRACKER) WDR Waste Discharge Requirements Listing CIWQS California Integrated Water Quality System CERS CERS NON-CASE INFO NON-CASE INFO (GEOTRACKER) OTHER OIL GAS OTHER OIL & GAS (GEOTRACKER) PROD WATER PONDS PROD WATER PONDS (GEOTRACKER) SAMPLING POINT SAMPLING POINT (GEOTRACKER) WELL STIM PROJ Well Stimulation Project (GEOTRACKER) MINES MRDS Mineral Resources Data System HWTS Hazardous Waste Tracking System EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records EDR MGP EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants 574 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC06917909.2r EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7 EDR Hist Auto EDR Exclusive Historical Auto Stations EDR Hist Cleaner EDR Exclusive Historical Cleaners EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives RGA LF Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List RGA LUST Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank SURROUNDING SITES: SEARCH RESULTS Surrounding sites were identified in the following databases. Elevations have been determined from the USGS Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity should be field verified. Sites with an elevation equal to or higher than the target property have been differentiated below from sites with an elevation lower than the target property. Page numbers and map identification numbers refer to the EDR Radius Map report where detailed data on individual sites can be reviewed. Sites listed in bold italics are in multiple databases. Unmappable (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis. STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Lists of state- and tribal hazardous waste facilities ENVIROSTOR: The Department of Toxic Substances Control’s (DTSC’s) Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program’s (SMBRP’s) EnviroStor database identifes sites that have known contamination or sites for which there may be reasons to investigate further. The database includes the following site types: Federal Superfund sites (National Priorities List (NPL)); State Response, including Military Facilities and State Superfund; Voluntary Cleanup; and School sites. EnviroStor provides similar information to the information that was available in CalSites, and provides additional site information, including, but not limited to, identification of formerly-contaminated properties that have been released for reuse, properties where environmental deed restrictions have been recorded to prevent inappropriate land uses, and risk characterization information that is used to assess potential impacts to public health and the environment at contaminated sites. A review of the ENVIROSTOR list, as provided by EDR, and dated 10/25/2021 has revealed that there are 2 ENVIROSTOR sites within approximately 1 mile of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ PALM ELEMENTARY/MIDD GERALD FORD DRIVE/MO NNE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.296 mi.) 5 18 Facility Id: 33650015 Status: No Action Required UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHO GERALD FORD DRIVE/PO ENE 1/2 - 1 (0.774 mi.) 6 21 Facility Id: 33650018 Status: No Action Required 575 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC06917909.2r EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 8 Lists of state and tribal registered storage tanks AST: A listing of aboveground storage tank petroleum storage tank locations. A review of the AST list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there is 1 AST site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE 73705 GERALD FORD DR NNE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.179 mi.) A2 12 Database: AST, Date of Government Version: 07/06/2016 ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks CERS TANKS: List of sites in the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) Regulated Site Portal which fall under the Aboveground Petroleum Storage and Underground Storage Tank regulatory programs. A review of the CERS TANKS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 10/18/2021 has revealed that there are 2 CERS TANKS sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE 73705 GERALD FORD DR NNE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.179 mi.) A1 9 PALM DESERT SHERIFFS 73705 GERALD FORD DR NNE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.179 mi.) A3 13 Other Ascertainable Records RCRA NonGen / NLR: RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste. A review of the RCRA NonGen / NLR list, as provided by EDR, and dated 02/28/2022 has revealed that there is 1 RCRA NonGen / NLR site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, 73705 GERALD FORD DR NNE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.179 mi.) A4 15 576 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC06917909.2r EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 9 There were no unmapped sites in this report. 577 EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.200240 3 2 0 2802 8 0 2 40320 32028 0 280 2 8040 240 28 0280280 24 0 24 0 20 0 2 00578 EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc. 2 4 0 579 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search TargetDistance Total Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Lists of Federal NPL (Superfund) sites 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000NPL 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Proposed NPL 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000NPL LIENS Lists of Federal Delisted NPL sites 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Delisted NPL Lists of Federal sites subject to CERCLA removals and CERCLA orders 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500FEDERAL FACILITY 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SEMS Lists of Federal CERCLA sites with NFRAP 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SEMS-ARCHIVE Lists of Federal RCRA facilities undergoing Corrective Action 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000CORRACTS Lists of Federal RCRA TSD facilities 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500RCRA-TSDF Lists of Federal RCRA generators 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA-LQG 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA-SQG 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA-VSQG Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500LUCIS 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US ENG CONTROLS 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US INST CONTROLS Federal ERNS list 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001ERNS Lists of state- and tribal (Superfund) equivalent sites 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000RESPONSE Lists of state- and tribal hazardous waste facilities 2 NR 1 1 0 0 1.000ENVIROSTOR Lists of state and tribal landfills and solid waste disposal facilities 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SWF/LF TC06917909.2r Page 4 580 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search TargetDistance Total Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted Lists of state and tribal leaking storage tanks 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500LUST 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN LUST 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500CPS-SLIC Lists of state and tribal registered storage tanks 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250FEMA UST 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250UST 1 NR NR NR 1 0 0.250AST 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250INDIAN UST Lists of state and tribal voluntary cleanup sites 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500VCP 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN VCP Lists of state and tribal brownfield sites 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500BROWNFIELDS ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US BROWNFIELDS Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500WMUDS/SWAT 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SWRCY 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001HAULERS 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN ODI 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500DEBRIS REGION 9 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500ODI 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500IHS OPEN DUMPS Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001US HIST CDL 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000HIST Cal-Sites 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250SCH 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001CDL 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250CERS HAZ WASTE 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Toxic Pits 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001US CDL 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500PFAS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPAQUEOUS FOAM Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250SWEEPS UST 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250HIST UST 2 NR NR NR 2 0 0.250CERS TANKS TC06917909.2r Page 5 581 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search TargetDistance Total Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250CA FID UST Local Land Records 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001LIENS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001LIENS 2 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500DEED Records of Emergency Release Reports 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001HMIRS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001CHMIRS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001LDS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001MCS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001SPILLS 90 Other Ascertainable Records 1 NR NR NR 1 0 0.250RCRA NonGen / NLR 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000FUDS 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000DOD 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SCRD DRYCLEANERS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001US FIN ASSUR 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001EPA WATCH LIST 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.2502020 COR ACTION 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001TSCA 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001TRIS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001SSTS 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000ROD 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001RMP 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001RAATS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001PRP 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001PADS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001ICIS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001FTTS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001MLTS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001COAL ASH DOE 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500COAL ASH EPA 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001PCB TRANSFORMER 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001RADINFO 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001HIST FTTS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001DOT OPS 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000CONSENT 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000INDIAN RESERV 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000FUSRAP 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500UMTRA 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001LEAD SMELTERS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001US AIRS 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250US MINES 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250ABANDONED MINES 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001FINDS 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000UXO 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001DOCKET HWC 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001ECHO TC06917909.2r Page 6 582 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search TargetDistance Total Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250FUELS PROGRAM 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000CA BOND EXP. PLAN 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500Cortese 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250CUPA Listings 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250DRYCLEANERS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001EMI 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001ENF 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001Financial Assurance 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001HAZNET 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001ICE 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500HIST CORTESE 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000HWP 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250HWT 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250MINES 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250MWMP 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001NPDES 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001PEST LIC 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500PROC 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Notify 65 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001UIC 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001UIC GEO 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500WASTEWATER PITS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001WDS 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250WIP 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001MILITARY PRIV SITES 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001PROJECT 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001WDR 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001CIWQS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001CERS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001NON-CASE INFO 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001OTHER OIL GAS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001PROD WATER PONDS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001SAMPLING POINT 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001WELL STIM PROJ 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001MINES MRDS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPHWTS EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000EDR MGP 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.125EDR Hist Auto 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.125EDR Hist Cleaner EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001RGA LF 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001RGA LUST 6 0 1 1 4 0 0- Totals -- TC06917909.2r Page 7 583 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search TargetDistance Total Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted NOTES: TP = Target Property NR = Not Requested at this Search Distance Sites may be listed in more than one database TC06917909.2r Page 8 584 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 6.95, Section(s) 25508(a)(1) HSC 6.95 25508(a)(1) - California Health and Safety Code, ChapterCitation: 08-21-2019Violation Date: County of Riverside Fleet ServicesSite Name: 108469Site ID: CERS,Violation Source: HMRRPViolation Program: Riverside County Department of Env HealthViolation Division: http://cers.calepa.ca.gov. the statewide information management system at Owner/operator shall submit all required Business Plan sections into system. Specifically, Plans and Inventory. CORRECTIVE ACTION: Business Plan was submitted into the statewide information management Returned to compliance on 09/17/2019. OBSERVATION: An incompleteViolation Notes: quantities. storing/handling a hazardous material at or above reportable Failure to complete and electronically submit a business plan whenViolation Description: 6.95, Section(s) 25508(a)(1) HSC 6.95 25508(a)(1) - California Health and Safety Code, ChapterCitation: 08-21-2019Violation Date: County of Riverside Fleet ServicesSite Name: 108469Site ID: CERS,Violation Source: APSAViolation Program: Riverside County Department of Env HealthViolation Division: Returned to compliance on 12/18/2020.Violation Notes: a statement as to whether the SPCC Plan will be amended. once every five years, document the completion of the review, and sign Failure to complete a review and evaluation of the SPCC Plan at leastViolation Description: 6.67, Section(s) 25270.4.5 (a) HSC 6.67 25270.4.5 (a) - California Health and Safety Code, ChapterCitation: 08-21-2019Violation Date: County of Riverside Fleet ServicesSite Name: 108469Site ID: Violations: Chemical Storage FacilitiesCERS Description: 10330120CERS ID: 108469Site ID: PALM DESERT, CA 92211City,State,Zip: 73705 GERALD FORD DRAddress: COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE FLEET SERVICESName: CERS: Aboveground Petroleum StorageCERS Description: 10330120CERS ID: 108469Site ID: PALM DESERT, CA 92211City,State,Zip: 73705 GERALD FORD DRAddress: COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE FLEET SERVICESName: CERS TANKS: 946 ft. Site 1 of 4 in cluster A 0.179 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 298 ft. 1/8-1/4 PALM DESERT, CA 92211 NNE CERS73705 GERALD FORD DR N/A A1 CERS TANKSCOUNTY OF RIVERSIDE FLEET SERVICES S123499029 TC06917909.2r Page 9 585 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedEntity Title: County Of Riverside-Fleet ServicesEntity Name: Parent CorporationAffiliation Type Desc: ,Affiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Darrell WhiteakerEntity Name: Document PreparerAffiliation Type Desc: (951) 358-5055,Affiliation Phone: 92503Affiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: RiversideAffiliation City: 4065 County Circle Drive, Room 104Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Riverside Cnty Env HealthEntity Name: CUPA DistrictAffiliation Type Desc: Affiliation: CERS,Eval Source: APSAEval Program: Riverside County Department of Env HealthEval Division: Not reportedEval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: YesViolations Found: 08-21-2019Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEval Program: Riverside County Department of Env HealthEval Division: Not reportedEval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: YesViolations Found: 08-21-2019Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: Evaluation: CERS,Violation Source: HMRRPViolation Program: Riverside County Department of Env HealthViolation Division: certified on at least an annual basis. at http://cers.calepa.ca.gov. Business plans shall be reviewed and updated business plan in the statewide information management system management system. CORRECTIVE ACTION: Owner/Operator shall submit an business plan certification was observed in the statewide information Returned to compliance on 09/17/2019. OBSERVATION: No complete annualViolation Notes: date. business plan is complete and accurate on or before the annual due Failure to annually review and electronically certify that theViolation Description: COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE FLEET SERVICES (Continued) S123499029 TC06917909.2r Page 10 586 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation ,Affiliation Phone: 92509Affiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: RiversideAffiliation City: 5293 Mission BlvdAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Darrell StephenEntity Name: Environmental ContactAffiliation Type Desc: (951) 955-4650,Affiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: County of Riverside, Fleet ServicesEntity Name: OperatorAffiliation Type Desc: ,Affiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Automotive Service SupervisorEntity Title: Darrell WhiteakerEntity Name: Identification SignerAffiliation Type Desc: ,Affiliation Phone: 92501Affiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: RiversideAffiliation City: 4293 Orange StAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Mailing AddressEntity Name: Facility Mailing AddressAffiliation Type Desc: (951) 955-4659,Affiliation Phone: 92509Affiliation Zip: United StatesAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: RiversideAffiliation City: 5293 Mission BlvdAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: County of Riverside, Fleet ServicesEntity Name: Legal OwnerAffiliation Type Desc: ,Affiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE FLEET SERVICES (Continued) S123499029 TC06917909.2r Page 11 587 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation (951) 955-4658,Affiliation Phone: 92509Affiliation Zip: United StatesAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: RiversideAffiliation City: 5293 Mission BlvdAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: County of Riverside, Fleet ServicesEntity Name: Property OwnerAffiliation Type Desc: COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE FLEET SERVICES (Continued) S123499029 Not reportedEPAID: Not reportedProperty Owner Country: Not reportedProperty Owner Zip Code: Not reportedProperty Owner Stat : Not reportedProperty Owner City: Not reportedProperty Owner Mailing Address: Not reportedProperty Owner Phone: Not reportedProperty Owner Name: United StatesOwner Country: Not reportedOwner Zip Code: Not reportedOwner State: 73705 Gerald Ford DrOwner Mail Address: 9519554650Owner Phone: 9519554650Operator Phone: County of Riverside Fleet ServicesOperator Name: 92509Mailing Address Zip Code: CAMailing Address State: RiversideMailing Address City: 5293 Mission BlvdMailing Address: Not reportedFax: 9519554650Phone: County of Riverside Fleet ServicesBusiness Name: Not reportedFacility ID: 10330120CERSID: Not reportedTotal Gallons: County of Riverside Fleet ServicesOwner: Not reportedCertified Unified Program Agencies: PALM DESERT,92211City/Zip: 73705 GERALD FORD DRAddress: COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE FLEET SERVICESName: AST: 946 ft. Site 2 of 4 in cluster A 0.179 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 298 ft. 1/8-1/4 PALM DESERT, CA 92211 NNE 73705 GERALD FORD DR N/A A2 ASTCOUNTY OF RIVERSIDE FLEET SERVICES A100419064 TC06917909.2r Page 12 588 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEval Program: Riverside County Department of Env HealthEval Division: diesel for back-up generator. A routine inspection was conducted on this date. Facility storesEval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: YesViolations Found: 07-02-2019Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: CERS,Eval Source: APSAEval Program: Riverside County Department of Env HealthEval Division: Not reportedEval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 07-02-2019Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: Evaluation: CERS,Violation Source: HMRRPViolation Program: Riverside County Department of Env HealthViolation Division: Submit photos to this department. Signs shall be posted on the entrance door to the generator room. research chemical safety data sheets and post proper NFPA-704 signs. signs were not posted. CORRECTIVE ACTION: Owner/operator shall Returned to compliance on 08/09/2019. OBSERVATION: Required NFPA-704Violation Notes: Ordinance Business Plan Program - Operations/Maintenance - General LocalViolation Description: Un-SpecifiedCitation: 07-02-2019Violation Date: Palm Desert Sheriffs-Central Plant (PD2207)Site Name: 521316Site ID: Violations: Chemical Storage FacilitiesCERS Description: 10789489CERS ID: 521316Site ID: PALM DESERT, CA 92211City,State,Zip: 73705 GERALD FORD DRAddress: PALM DESERT SHERIFFS-CENTRAL PLANT (PD2207)Name: CERS: Aboveground Petroleum StorageCERS Description: 10789489CERS ID: 521316Site ID: PALM DESERT, CA 92211City,State,Zip: 73705 GERALD FORD DRAddress: PALM DESERT SHERIFFS-CENTRAL PLANT (PD2207)Name: CERS TANKS: 946 ft. Site 3 of 4 in cluster A 0.179 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 298 ft. 1/8-1/4 PALM DESERT, CA 92211 NNE CERS73705 GERALD FORD DR N/A A3 CERS TANKSPALM DESERT SHERIFFS-CENTRAL PLANT (PD2207) S124437532 TC06917909.2r Page 13 589 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation RiversideAffiliation City: 3133 Misison Inn Ave.Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Mailing AddressEntity Name: Facility Mailing AddressAffiliation Type Desc: ,Affiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Laura BallesterosEntity Name: Document PreparerAffiliation Type Desc: ,Affiliation Phone: 92507Affiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: RiversideAffiliation City: 3133 Mission Inn Ave.Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Laura BallesterosEntity Name: Environmental ContactAffiliation Type Desc: ,Affiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Development SpecialistEntity Title: Laura BallesterosEntity Name: Identification SignerAffiliation Type Desc: (951) 358-5055,Affiliation Phone: 92503Affiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: RiversideAffiliation City: 4065 County Circle Drive, Room 104Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Riverside Cnty Env HealthEntity Name: CUPA DistrictAffiliation Type Desc: Affiliation: -116.378640Longitude: 33.785870Latitude: Center of a facility or station.,Ref Point Type Desc: Not reportedCoord Name: 10789489Program ID: APSAEnv Int Type Code: Palm Desert Sheriffs-Central Plant (PD2207)Facility Name: 521316Site ID: Coordinates: PALM DESERT SHERIFFS-CENTRAL PLANT (PD2207) (Continued) S124437532 TC06917909.2r Page 14 590 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation (951) 955-0911,Affiliation Phone: 92507Affiliation Zip: United StatesAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: RiversideAffiliation City: 3133 Mission Inn Ave.Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: County of RiversideEntity Name: Property OwnerAffiliation Type Desc: (951) 955-4850,Affiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, EDAEntity Name: OperatorAffiliation Type Desc: ,Affiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Riverside County FMEntity Name: Parent CorporationAffiliation Type Desc: (951) 955-0911,Affiliation Phone: 92507Affiliation Zip: United StatesAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: RiversideAffiliation City: 3133 Mission Inn Ave.Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: County of Riverside (PD2207)Entity Name: Legal OwnerAffiliation Type Desc: ,Affiliation Phone: 92507Affiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: PALM DESERT SHERIFFS-CENTRAL PLANT (PD2207) (Continued) S124437532 CAC003154038EPA ID: PALM DESERT, CA 92211Handler City,State,Zip: 73705 GERALD FORD DRIVEHandler Address: COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, FACILITIES MANAGEMENTHandler Name: 20211222Date Form Received by Agency: RCRA NonGen / NLR: 946 ft. Site 4 of 4 in cluster A 0.179 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 298 ft. 1/8-1/4 PALM DESERT, CA 92211 NNE 73705 GERALD FORD DRIVE CAC003154038 A4 RCRA NonGen / NLRCOUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, FACILITIES MANAGEMENT 1027081943 TC06917909.2r Page 15 591 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoTSDFs Only Subject to CA under Discretionary Auth Universe: NoTSDFs Potentially Subject to CA Under 3004 (u)/(v) Universe: NoNon-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe: NoSubject to Corrective Action Universe: NoCorrective Action Workload Universe: No202 GPRA Corrective Action Baseline: Not reportedClosure Workload Universe: Not reportedPost-Closure Workload Universe: Not reportedPermit Progress Universe: Not reportedPermit Workload Universe: Not reportedPermit Renewals Workload Universe: Not on the Baseline2018 GPRA Renewals Baseline: Not on the Baseline2018 GPRA Permit Baseline: Not reportedTreatment Storage and Disposal Type: NoCommercial TSD Indicator: Not reportedSub-Part K Indicator: NHazardous Secondary Material Indicator: Not reportedFederal Facility Indicator: ---Active Site State-Reg Handler: Not reportedActive Site State-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: Not reportedActive Site Converter Treatment storage and Disposal Facility: Not reportedActive Site Fed-Reg Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility: NoFederal Universal Waste: NoUniversal Waste Destination Facility: NoUniversal Waste Indicator: NoOff-Site Waste Receipt: NoUnderground Injection Control: NoSmelting Melting and Refining Furnace Exemption: NoSmall Quantity On-Site Burner Exemption: NoRecycler Activity with Storage: NoTransfer Facility Activity: NoTransporter Activity: NoMixed Waste Generator: NoImporter Activity: NoShort-Term Generator Activity: OtherOperator Type: LAURA BALLESTEROSOperator Name: OtherOwner Type: COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, FACILITIES MANOwner Name: RIVERSIDE, CA 92507Mailing City,State,Zip: 3133 MISSION INN AVEMailing Address: Not reportedState District: Not reportedState District Owner: Not reportedActive Site Indicator: Not reportedAccessibility: Not reportedBiennial Report Cycle: Not reportedNon-Notifier: Not a generator, verifiedFederal Waste Generator Description: Not reportedLand Type: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact Title: LBALLESTEROS@RIVCO.ORGContact Email: Not reportedContact Fax: 951-955-9619Contact Telephone: RIVERSIDE, CA 92507Contact City,State,Zip: 3133 MISSION INN AVEContact Address: LAURA BALLESTEROSContact Name: COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, FACILITIES MANAGEMENT (Continued) 1027081943 TC06917909.2r Page 16 592 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoSpent Lead Acid Battery Importer: NoRecognized Trader Exporter: NoRecognized Trader Importer: NoLarge Quantity Handler of Universal Waste: Not reportedState District Owner: Not a generator, verifiedFederal Waste Generator Description: COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, FACILITIES MANAGEMENTHandler Name: 20211222Receive Date: Historic Generators: Not reportedOwner/Operator Email: Not reportedOwner/Operator Fax: Not reportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 951-955-9619Owner/Operator Telephone: RIVERSIDE, CA 92507Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 3133 MISSION INN AVEOwner/Operator Address: Not reportedDate Ended Current: Not reportedDate Became Current: OtherLegal Status: LAURA BALLESTEROSOwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: Not reportedOwner/Operator Email: Not reportedOwner/Operator Fax: Not reportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 951-955-9619Owner/Operator Telephone: RIVERSIDE, CA 92507Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 3133 MISSION INN AVEOwner/Operator Address: Not reportedDate Ended Current: Not reportedDate Became Current: OtherLegal Status: COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, FACILITIES MANOwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: Handler - Owner Operator: NoSub-Part P Indicator: NoManifest Broker: NoRecycler Activity Without Storage: NoExporter of Spent Lead Acid Batteries: NoImporter of Spent Lead Acid Batteries: NoRecognized Trader-Exporter: NoRecognized Trader-Importer: 20211222Handler Date of Last Change: Not reportedFinancial Assurance Required: NoSignificant Non-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe: NoAddressed Significant Non-Complier Universe: NoUnaddressed Significant Non-Complier Universe: NoSignificant Non-Complier Universe: Not reportedFull Enforcement Universe: Not reportedOperating TSDF Universe: N/AGroundwater Controls Indicator: N/AHuman Exposure Controls Indicator: NoInstitutional Control Indicator: NoEnvironmental Control Indicator: No NCAPS rankingCorrective Action Priority Ranking: COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, FACILITIES MANAGEMENT (Continued) 1027081943 TC06917909.2r Page 17 593 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No Evaluations FoundEvaluations: Evaluation Action Summary: No Violations FoundViolations: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: OTHER GENERAL GOVERNMENT SUPPORTNAICS Description: 92119NAICS Code: List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions: NoElectronic Manifest Broker: NoNon Storage Recycler Activity: YesCurrent Record: NoSpent Lead Acid Battery Exporter: COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, FACILITIES MANAGEMENT (Continued) 1027081943 Alternate NameAlias Type: PALM SPRINGS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICTAlias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: PALM ELEMENTARY/MIDDLE SCHOOLAlias Name: NMAPotential Description: NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: NONE SPECIFIED No Contaminants foundPotential COC: NONEPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -116.3797Longitude: 33.7892Latitude: School DistrictFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt Req: NORestricted Use: Not reportedSpecial Program: 28Senate: 42Assembly: Southern California Schools & Brownfields OutreachDivision Branch: Shahir HaddadSupervisor: Not reportedProgram Manager: DTSCLead Agency: DTSCRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: 24Acres: SchoolSite Type Detailed: School InvestigationSite Type: 404494Site Code: 11/21/2003Status Date: No Action RequiredStatus: 33650015Facility ID: PALM DESERT, CA 92211City,State,Zip: GERALD FORD DRIVE/MONTEREY AVENUEAddress: PALM ELEMENTARY/MIDDLE SCHOOLName: ENVIROSTOR: 1563 ft. 0.296 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 295 ft. 1/4-1/2 PALM DESERT, CA 92211 NNE SCHGERALD FORD DRIVE/MONTEREY AVENUE N/A 5 ENVIROSTORPALM ELEMENTARY/MIDDLE SCHOOL S118756738 TC06917909.2r Page 18 594 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSpecial Program Status: 28Senate: 42Assembly: 404494Site Code: Southern California Schools & Brownfields OutreachDivision Branch: Shahir HaddadSupervisor: Not reportedProject Manager: * DTSCLead Agency Description: DTSCLead Agency: DTSCCleanup Oversight Agencies: NONational Priorities List: 24Acres: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt. Req.: SchoolSite Type Detail: School InvestigationSite Type: 33650015Facility ID: PALM DESERT, CA 92211City,State,Zip: GERALD FORD DRIVE/MONTEREY AVENUEAddress: PALM ELEMENTARY/MIDDLE SCHOOLName: SCH: Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: Not reportedComments: 11/21/2003Completed Date: Phase 1Completed Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 11/12/2003Completed Date: Site Inspections/Visit (Non LUR)Completed Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 11/26/2003Completed Date: Cost Recovery Closeout MemoCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 33650015Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 404494Alias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: PALM SPRINGS USD-PALM ELEM/MID SCHOOLAlias Name: PALM ELEMENTARY/MIDDLE SCHOOL (Continued) S118756738 TC06917909.2r Page 19 595 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: Not reportedComments: 11/21/2003Completed Date: Phase 1Completed Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 11/12/2003Completed Date: Site Inspections/Visit (Non LUR)Completed Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 11/26/2003Completed Date: Cost Recovery Closeout MemoCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 33650015Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 404494Alias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: PALM SPRINGS USD-PALM ELEM/MID SCHOOLAlias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: PALM SPRINGS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICTAlias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: PALM ELEMENTARY/MIDDLE SCHOOLAlias Name: NMAPotential Description: NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: NONE SPECIFIED, No Contaminants foundPotential COC: NONEPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -116.3797Longitude: 33.7892Latitude: School DistrictFunding: NORestricted Use: 11/21/2003Status Date: No Action RequiredStatus: PALM ELEMENTARY/MIDDLE SCHOOL (Continued) S118756738 TC06917909.2r Page 20 596 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedComments: 04/19/2004Completed Date: Phase 1Completed Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 05/03/2004Completed Date: Cost Recovery Closeout MemoCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 33650018Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 404493Alias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOLAlias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: PALM SPRINGS USD-UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOLAlias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: PALM SPRINGS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICTAlias Name: NMAPotential Description: NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: NONE SPECIFIED No Contaminants foundPotential COC: NONEPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -116.3679Longitude: 33.7887Latitude: School DistrictFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt Req: NORestricted Use: Not reportedSpecial Program: 28Senate: 42Assembly: Southern California Schools & Brownfields OutreachDivision Branch: Yolanda GarzaSupervisor: Not reportedProgram Manager: DTSCLead Agency: DTSCRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: 34Acres: SchoolSite Type Detailed: School InvestigationSite Type: 404493Site Code: 04/19/2004Status Date: No Action RequiredStatus: 33650018Facility ID: PALM DESERT, CA 92211City,State,Zip: GERALD FORD DRIVE/PORTOLA AVENUEAddress: UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOLName: ENVIROSTOR: 4089 ft. 0.774 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 184 ft. 1/2-1 PALM DESERT, CA 92211 ENE SCHGERALD FORD DRIVE/PORTOLA AVENUE N/A 6 ENVIROSTORUNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL S118756741 TC06917909.2r Page 21 597 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Cost Recovery Closeout MemoCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 33650018Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 404493Alias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOLAlias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: PALM SPRINGS USD-UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOLAlias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: PALM SPRINGS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICTAlias Name: NMAPotential Description: NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: NONE SPECIFIED, No Contaminants foundPotential COC: NONEPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -116.3679Longitude: 33.7887Latitude: School DistrictFunding: NORestricted Use: 04/19/2004Status Date: No Action RequiredStatus: Not reportedSpecial Program Status: 28Senate: 42Assembly: 404493Site Code: Southern California Schools & Brownfields OutreachDivision Branch: Yolanda GarzaSupervisor: Not reportedProject Manager: * DTSCLead Agency Description: DTSCLead Agency: DTSCCleanup Oversight Agencies: NONational Priorities List: 34Acres: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt. Req.: SchoolSite Type Detail: School InvestigationSite Type: 33650018Facility ID: PALM DESERT, CA 92211City,State,Zip: GERALD FORD DRIVE/PORTOLA AVENUEAddress: UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOLName: SCH: Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL (Continued) S118756741 TC06917909.2r Page 22 598 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: Not reportedComments: 04/19/2004Completed Date: Phase 1Completed Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 05/03/2004Completed Date: UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL (Continued) S118756741 TC06917909.2r Page 23 599 ORPHAN SUMMARYCityEDR IDSite NameSite AddressZipDatabase(s)Count: 0 records.NO SITES FOUNDTC06917909.2r Page 24600 To maintain currency of the following federal and state databases, EDR contacts the appropriate governmental agency on a monthly or quarterly basis, as required. Number of Days to Update:Provides confirmation that EDR is reporting records that have been updated within 90 days from the date the government agency made the information available to the public. STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Lists of Federal NPL (Superfund) sites NPL: National Priority List National Priorities List (Superfund). The NPL is a subset of CERCLIS and identifies over 1,200 sites for priority cleanup under the Superfund Program. NPL sites may encompass relatively large areas. As such, EDR provides polygon coverage for over 1,000 NPL site boundaries produced by EPA’s Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC) and regional EPA offices. Date of Government Version: 01/25/2022 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/03/2022 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/22/2022 Number of Days to Update: 19 Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 03/02/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/11/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly NPL Site Boundaries Sources: EPA’s Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC) Telephone: 202-564-7333 EPA Region 1 EPA Region 6 Telephone 617-918-1143 Telephone: 214-655-6659 EPA Region 3 EPA Region 7 Telephone 215-814-5418 Telephone: 913-551-7247 EPA Region 4 EPA Region 8 Telephone 404-562-8033 Telephone: 303-312-6774 EPA Region 5 EPA Region 9 Telephone 312-886-6686 Telephone: 415-947-4246 EPA Region 10 Telephone 206-553-8665 Proposed NPL: Proposed National Priority List Sites A site that has been proposed for listing on the National Priorities List through the issuance of a proposed rule in the Federal Register. EPA then accepts public comments on the site, responds to the comments, and places on the NPL those sites that continue to meet the requirements for listing. Date of Government Version: 01/25/2022 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/03/2022 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/22/2022 Number of Days to Update: 19 Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 03/02/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/11/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly NPL LIENS: Federal Superfund Liens Federal Superfund Liens. Under the authority granted the USEPA by CERCLA of 1980, the USEPA has the authority to file liens against real property in order to recover remedial action expenditures or when the property owner received notification of potential liability. USEPA compiles a listing of filed notices of Superfund Liens. TC06917909.2r Page GR-1 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 601 Date of Government Version: 10/15/1991 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/02/1994 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/30/1994 Number of Days to Update: 56 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4267 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned Lists of Federal Delisted NPL sites Delisted NPL: National Priority List Deletions The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) establishes the criteria that the EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e), sites may be deleted from the NPL where no further response is appropriate. Date of Government Version: 01/25/2022 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/03/2022 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/22/2022 Number of Days to Update: 19 Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 03/02/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/11/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Lists of Federal sites subject to CERCLA removals and CERCLA orders FEDERAL FACILITY: Federal Facility Site Information listing A listing of National Priority List (NPL) and Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) sites found in the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) Database where EPA Federal Facilities Restoration and Reuse Office is involved in cleanup activities. Date of Government Version: 05/25/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/24/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/20/2021 Number of Days to Update: 88 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-8704 Last EDR Contact: 12/29/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/11/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies SEMS: Superfund Enterprise Management System SEMS (Superfund Enterprise Management System) tracks hazardous waste sites, potentially hazardous waste sites, and remedial activities performed in support of EPA’s Superfund Program across the United States. The list was formerly know as CERCLIS, renamed to SEMS by the EPA in 2015. The list contains data on potentially hazardous waste sites that have been reported to the USEPA by states, municipalities, private companies and private persons, pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). This dataset also contains sites which are either proposed to or on the National Priorities List (NPL) and the sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL. Date of Government Version: 01/25/2022 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/03/2022 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/22/2022 Number of Days to Update: 19 Source: EPA Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 03/02/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/25/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Lists of Federal CERCLA sites with NFRAP SEMS-ARCHIVE: Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive TC06917909.2r Page GR-2 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 602 SEMS-ARCHIVE (Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive) tracks sites that have no further interest under the Federal Superfund Program based on available information. The list was formerly known as the CERCLIS-NFRAP, renamed to SEMS ARCHIVE by the EPA in 2015. EPA may perform a minimal level of assessment work at a site while it is archived if site conditions change and/or new information becomes available. Archived sites have been removed and archived from the inventory of SEMS sites. Archived status indicates that, to the best of EPA’s knowledge, assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list the site on the National Priorities List (NPL), unless information indicates this decision was not appropriate or other considerations require a recommendation for listing at a later time. The decision does not necessarily mean that there is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that. based upon available information, the location is not judged to be potential NPL site. Date of Government Version: 01/25/2022 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/03/2022 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/22/2022 Number of Days to Update: 19 Source: EPA Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 03/02/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/25/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Lists of Federal RCRA facilities undergoing Corrective Action CORRACTS: Corrective Action Report CORRACTS identifies hazardous waste handlers with RCRA corrective action activity. Date of Government Version: 02/28/2022 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/02/2022 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/17/2022 Number of Days to Update: 15 Source: EPA Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 03/02/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/04/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Lists of Federal RCRA TSD facilities RCRA-TSDF: RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Transporters are individuals or entities that move hazardous waste from the generator offsite to a facility that can recycle, treat, store, or dispose of the waste. TSDFs treat, store, or dispose of the waste. Date of Government Version: 02/28/2022 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/02/2022 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/17/2022 Number of Days to Update: 15 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 03/02/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/04/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Lists of Federal RCRA generators RCRA-LQG: RCRA - Large Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Large quantity generators (LQGs) generate over 1,000 kilograms (kg) of hazardous waste, or over 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 02/28/2022 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/02/2022 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/17/2022 Number of Days to Update: 15 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 03/02/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/04/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC06917909.2r Page GR-3 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 603 RCRA-SQG: RCRA - Small Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Small quantity generators (SQGs) generate between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 02/28/2022 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/02/2022 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/17/2022 Number of Days to Update: 15 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 03/02/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/04/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly RCRA-VSQG: RCRA - Very Small Quantity Generators (Formerly Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators) RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Very small quantity generators (VSQGs) generate less than 100 kg of hazardous waste, or less than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 02/28/2022 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/02/2022 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/17/2022 Number of Days to Update: 15 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 03/02/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/04/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries LUCIS: Land Use Control Information System LUCIS contains records of land use control information pertaining to the former Navy Base Realignment and Closure properties. Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/16/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2022 Number of Days to Update: 84 Source: Department of the Navy Telephone: 843-820-7326 Last EDR Contact: 02/07/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/23/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies US ENG CONTROLS: Engineering Controls Sites List A listing of sites with engineering controls in place. Engineering controls include various forms of caps, building foundations, liners, and treatment methods to create pathway elimination for regulated substances to enter environmental media or effect human health. Date of Government Version: 11/19/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/19/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/14/2022 Number of Days to Update: 87 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-0695 Last EDR Contact: 02/23/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/06/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies US INST CONTROLS: Institutional Controls Sites List A listing of sites with institutional controls in place. Institutional controls include administrative measures, such as groundwater use restrictions, construction restrictions, property use restrictions, and post remediation care requirements intended to prevent exposure to contaminants remaining on site. Deed restrictions are generally required as part of the institutional controls. Date of Government Version: 11/19/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/19/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/14/2022 Number of Days to Update: 87 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-0695 Last EDR Contact: 02/23/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/06/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC06917909.2r Page GR-4 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 604 Federal ERNS list ERNS: Emergency Response Notification System Emergency Response Notification System. ERNS records and stores information on reported releases of oil and hazardous substances. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2022 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/10/2022 Number of Days to Update: 9 Source: National Response Center, United States Coast Guard Telephone: 202-267-2180 Last EDR Contact: 03/22/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/04/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Lists of state- and tribal (Superfund) equivalent sites RESPONSE: State Response Sites Identifies confirmed release sites where DTSC is involved in remediation, either in a lead or oversight capacity. These confirmed release sites are generally high-priority and high potential risk. Date of Government Version: 10/25/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/14/2022 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 01/25/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/09/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Lists of state- and tribal hazardous waste facilities ENVIROSTOR: EnviroStor Database The Department of Toxic Substances Control’s (DTSC’s) Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program’s (SMBRP’s) EnviroStor database identifes sites that have known contamination or sites for which there may be reasons to investigate further. The database includes the following site types: Federal Superfund sites (National Priorities List (NPL)); State Response, including Military Facilities and State Superfund; Voluntary Cleanup; and School sites. EnviroStor provides similar information to the information that was available in CalSites, and provides additional site information, including, but not limited to, identification of formerly-contaminated properties that have been released for reuse, properties where environmental deed restrictions have been recorded to prevent inappropriate land uses, and risk characterization information that is used to assess potential impacts to public health and the environment at contaminated sites. Date of Government Version: 10/25/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/14/2022 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 01/25/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/09/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Lists of state and tribal landfills and solid waste disposal facilities SWF/LF (SWIS): Solid Waste Information System Active, Closed and Inactive Landfills. SWF/LF records typically contain an inve ntory of solid waste disposal facilities or landfills. These may be active or i nactive facilities or open dumps that failed to meet RCRA Section 4004 criteria for solid waste landfills or disposal sites. Date of Government Version: 11/08/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/09/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/28/2022 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery Telephone: 916-341-6320 Last EDR Contact: 02/08/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/23/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Lists of state and tribal leaking storage tanks TC06917909.2r Page GR-5 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 605 LUST REG 6L: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Case Listing For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database. Date of Government Version: 09/09/2003 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/10/2003 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/07/2003 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Lahontan Region (6) Telephone: 530-542-5572 Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 6V: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Case Listing Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Inyo, Kern, Los Angeles, Mono, San Bernardino counties. Date of Government Version: 06/07/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/07/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/29/2005 Number of Days to Update: 22 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Victorville Branch Office (6) Telephone: 760-241-7365 Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 1: Active Toxic Site Investigation Del Norte, Humboldt, Lake, Mendocino, Modoc, Siskiyou, Sonoma, Trinity counties. For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database. Date of Government Version: 02/01/2001 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/28/2001 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/29/2001 Number of Days to Update: 29 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board North Coast (1) Telephone: 707-570-3769 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 2: Fuel Leak List Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, Napa, San Francisco, San Mateo, Santa Clara, Solano, Sonoma counties. Date of Government Version: 09/30/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/20/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/19/2004 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region (2) Telephone: 510-622-2433 Last EDR Contact: 09/19/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/02/2012 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 3: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Database Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Monterey, San Benito, San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara, Santa Cruz counties. Date of Government Version: 05/19/2003 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/19/2003 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/02/2003 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Coast Region (3) Telephone: 805-542-4786 Last EDR Contact: 07/18/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/31/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 4: Underground Storage Tank Leak List Los Angeles, Ventura counties. For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database. Date of Government Version: 09/07/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/07/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/12/2004 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Los Angeles Region (4) Telephone: 213-576-6710 Last EDR Contact: 09/06/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/19/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 5: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Database Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Alameda, Alpine, Amador, Butte, Colusa, Contra Costa, Calveras, El Dorado, Fresno, Glenn, Kern, Kings, Lake, Lassen, Madera, Mariposa, Merced, Modoc, Napa, Nevada, Placer, Plumas, Sacramento, San Joaquin, Shasta, Solano, Stanislaus, Sutter, Tehama, Tulare, Tuolumne, Yolo, Yuba counties. TC06917909.2r Page GR-6 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 606 Date of Government Version: 07/01/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/22/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/31/2008 Number of Days to Update: 9 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region (5) Telephone: 916-464-4834 Last EDR Contact: 07/01/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 7: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Case Listing Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Imperial, Riverside, San Diego, Santa Barbara counties. Date of Government Version: 02/26/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/26/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/24/2004 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Colorado River Basin Region (7) Telephone: 760-776-8943 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 8: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks California Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region (8). For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database. Date of Government Version: 02/14/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/15/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/28/2005 Number of Days to Update: 41 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region (8) Telephone: 909-782-4496 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 9: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Report Orange, Riverside, San Diego counties. For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database. Date of Government Version: 03/01/2001 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/23/2001 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/21/2001 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Diego Region (9) Telephone: 858-637-5595 Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/09/2012 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST: Leaking Underground Fuel Tank Report (GEOTRACKER) Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) Sites included in GeoTracker. GeoTracker is the Water Boards data management system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater. Date of Government Version: 12/06/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/07/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/23/2022 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: see region list Last EDR Contact: 03/08/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/20/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN LUST R6: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in New Mexico and Oklahoma. Date of Government Version: 10/12/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2022 Number of Days to Update: 85 Source: EPA Region 6 Telephone: 214-665-6597 Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R7: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Iowa, Kansas, and Nebraska Date of Government Version: 10/12/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2022 Number of Days to Update: 85 Source: EPA Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7003 Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC06917909.2r Page GR-7 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 607 INDIAN LUST R8: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah and Wyoming. Date of Government Version: 10/12/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2022 Number of Days to Update: 85 Source: EPA Region 8 Telephone: 303-312-6271 Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R9: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Arizona, California, New Mexico and Nevada Date of Government Version: 10/12/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2022 Number of Days to Update: 85 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 415-972-3372 Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R10: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Alaska, Idaho, Oregon and Washington. Date of Government Version: 10/12/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2022 Number of Days to Update: 85 Source: EPA Region 10 Telephone: 206-553-2857 Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R5: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land Leaking underground storage tanks located on Indian Land in Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin. Date of Government Version: 10/12/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2022 Number of Days to Update: 85 Source: EPA, Region 5 Telephone: 312-886-7439 Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R4: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Florida, Mississippi and North Carolina. Date of Government Version: 05/28/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/22/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/20/2021 Number of Days to Update: 90 Source: EPA Region 4 Telephone: 404-562-8677 Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R1: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land A listing of leaking underground storage tank locations on Indian Land. Date of Government Version: 04/28/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/11/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021 Number of Days to Update: 88 Source: EPA Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1313 Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies CPS-SLIC: Statewide SLIC Cases (GEOTRACKER) Cleanup Program Sites (CPS; also known as Site Cleanups [SC] and formerly known as Spills, Leaks, Investigations, and Cleanups [SLIC] sites) included in GeoTracker. GeoTracker is the Water Boards data management system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater. Date of Government Version: 12/06/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/07/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/23/2022 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 03/08/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/20/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC06917909.2r Page GR-8 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 608 SLIC REG 1: Active Toxic Site Investigations The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 04/03/2003 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/07/2003 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/25/2003 Number of Days to Update: 18 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region (1) Telephone: 707-576-2220 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SLIC REG 2: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 09/30/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/20/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/19/2004 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region (2) Telephone: 510-286-0457 Last EDR Contact: 09/19/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/02/2012 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SLIC REG 3: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 05/18/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/15/2006 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Coast Region (3) Telephone: 805-549-3147 Last EDR Contact: 07/18/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/31/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SLIC REG 4: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 11/17/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/18/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2005 Number of Days to Update: 47 Source: Region Water Quality Control Board Los Angeles Region (4) Telephone: 213-576-6600 Last EDR Contact: 07/01/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SLIC REG 5: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 04/01/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/05/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/21/2005 Number of Days to Update: 16 Source: Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region (5) Telephone: 916-464-3291 Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SLIC REG 6V: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 05/24/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/25/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/16/2005 Number of Days to Update: 22 Source: Regional Water Quality Control Board, Victorville Branch Telephone: 619-241-6583 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned TC06917909.2r Page GR-9 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 609 SLIC REG 6L: SLIC Sites The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 09/07/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/07/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/12/2004 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Lahontan Region Telephone: 530-542-5574 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SLIC REG 7: SLIC List The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 11/24/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/29/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2005 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: California Regional Quality Control Board, Colorado River Basin Region Telephone: 760-346-7491 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SLIC REG 8: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 04/03/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/03/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/14/2008 Number of Days to Update: 11 Source: California Region Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region (8) Telephone: 951-782-3298 Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SLIC REG 9: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 09/10/2007 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/11/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/28/2007 Number of Days to Update: 17 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Diego Region (9) Telephone: 858-467-2980 Last EDR Contact: 08/08/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/21/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned Lists of state and tribal registered storage tanks FEMA UST: Underground Storage Tank Listing A listing of all FEMA owned underground storage tanks. Date of Government Version: 10/14/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/01/2022 Number of Days to Update: 88 Source: FEMA Telephone: 202-646-5797 Last EDR Contact: 02/07/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies MILITARY UST SITES: Military UST Sites (GEOTRACKER) Military ust sites Date of Government Version: 12/06/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/07/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/23/2022 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 03/08/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/20/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC06917909.2r Page GR-10 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 610 UST: Active UST Facilities Active UST facilities gathered from the local regulatory agencies Date of Government Version: 12/06/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/07/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/23/2022 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: SWRCB Telephone: 916-341-5851 Last EDR Contact: 03/08/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/20/2022 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually UST CLOSURE: Proposed Closure of Underground Storage Tank (UST) Cases UST cases that are being considered for closure by either the State Water Resources Control Board or the Executive Director have been posted for a 60-day public comment period. UST Case Closures being proposed for consideration by the State Water Resources Control Board. These are primarily UST cases that meet closure criteria under the decisional framework in State Water Board Resolution No. 92-49 and other Board orders. UST Case Closures proposed for consideration by the Executive Director pursuant to State Water Board Resolution No. 2012-0061. These are cases that meet the criteria of the Low-Threat UST Case Closure Policy. UST Case Closure Review Denials and Approved Orders. Date of Government Version: 12/01/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/07/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2022 Number of Days to Update: 85 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-327-7844 Last EDR Contact: 03/08/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/20/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies AST: Aboveground Petroleum Storage Tank Facilities A listing of aboveground storage tank petroleum storage tank locations. Date of Government Version: 07/06/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/12/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/19/2016 Number of Days to Update: 69 Source: California Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 916-327-5092 Last EDR Contact: 03/10/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/27/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R4: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 4 (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee and Tribal Nations) Date of Government Version: 05/28/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/22/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/20/2021 Number of Days to Update: 90 Source: EPA Region 4 Telephone: 404-562-9424 Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R6: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 6 (Louisiana, Arkansas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Texas and 65 Tribes). Date of Government Version: 10/12/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2022 Number of Days to Update: 85 Source: EPA Region 6 Telephone: 214-665-7591 Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R5: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 5 (Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 04/06/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/11/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021 Number of Days to Update: 88 Source: EPA Region 5 Telephone: 312-886-6136 Last EDR Contact: 02/09/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC06917909.2r Page GR-11 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 611 INDIAN UST R10: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 10 (Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, Washington, and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 10/12/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2022 Number of Days to Update: 85 Source: EPA Region 10 Telephone: 206-553-2857 Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R7: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 7 (Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, and 9 Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 10/12/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2022 Number of Days to Update: 85 Source: EPA Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7003 Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R8: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 8 (Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, Wyoming and 27 Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 10/12/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2022 Number of Days to Update: 85 Source: EPA Region 8 Telephone: 303-312-6137 Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R9: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 9 (Arizona, California, Hawaii, Nevada, the Pacific Islands, and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 10/12/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2022 Number of Days to Update: 85 Source: EPA Region 9 Telephone: 415-972-3368 Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R1: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 1 (Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont and ten Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 10/14/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2022 Number of Days to Update: 85 Source: EPA, Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1313 Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies Lists of state and tribal voluntary cleanup sites INDIAN VCP R1: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 1. Date of Government Version: 07/27/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/29/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2016 Number of Days to Update: 142 Source: EPA, Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1102 Last EDR Contact: 03/16/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/04/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC06917909.2r Page GR-12 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 612 INDIAN VCP R7: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Lisitng A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 7. Date of Government Version: 03/20/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/22/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/19/2008 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: EPA, Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7365 Last EDR Contact: 07/08/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/20/2009 Data Release Frequency: Varies VCP: Voluntary Cleanup Program Properties Contains low threat level properties with either confirmed or unconfirmed releases and the project proponents have request that DTSC oversee investigation and/or cleanup activities and have agreed to provide coverage for DTSC’s costs. Date of Government Version: 10/25/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/14/2022 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 01/25/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/09/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Lists of state and tribal brownfield sites BROWNFIELDS: Considered Brownfieds Sites Listing A listing of sites the SWRCB considers to be Brownfields since these are sites have come to them through the MOA Process. Date of Government Version: 12/15/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/16/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/03/2022 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-323-7905 Last EDR Contact: 03/21/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/04/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists US BROWNFIELDS: A Listing of Brownfields Sites Brownfields are real property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant. Cleaning up and reinvesting in these properties takes development pressures off of undeveloped, open land, and both improves and protects the environment. Assessment, Cleanup and Redevelopment Exchange System (ACRES) stores information reported by EPA Brownfields grant recipients on brownfields properties assessed or cleaned up with grant funding as well as information on Targeted Brownfields Assessments performed by EPA Regions. A listing of ACRES Brownfield sites is obtained from Cleanups in My Community. Cleanups in My Community provides information on Brownfields properties for which information is reported back to EPA, as well as areas served by Brownfields grant programs. Date of Government Version: 02/23/2022 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/10/2022 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/10/2022 Number of Days to Update: 0 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-2777 Last EDR Contact: 03/15/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/27/2022 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites WMUDS/SWAT: Waste Management Unit Database Waste Management Unit Database System. WMUDS is used by the State Water Resources Control Board staff and the Regional Water Quality Control Boards for program tracking and inventory of waste management units. WMUDS is composed of the following databases: Facility Information, Scheduled Inspections Information, Waste Management Unit Information, SWAT Program Information, SWAT Report Summary Information, SWAT Report Summary Data, Chapter 15 (formerly Subchapter 15) Information, Chapter 15 Monitoring Parameters, TPCA Program Information, RCRA Program Information, Closure Information, and Interested Parties Information. TC06917909.2r Page GR-13 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 613 Date of Government Version: 04/01/2000 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/10/2000 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/10/2000 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-227-4448 Last EDR Contact: 01/24/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/09/2022 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SWRCY: Recycler Database A listing of recycling facilities in California. Date of Government Version: 12/06/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/07/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/23/2022 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: Department of Conservation Telephone: 916-323-3836 Last EDR Contact: 03/08/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/20/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly HAULERS: Registered Waste Tire Haulers Listing A listing of registered waste tire haulers. Date of Government Version: 09/14/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/11/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/23/2021 Number of Days to Update: 12 Source: Integrated Waste Management Board Telephone: 916-341-6422 Last EDR Contact: 02/17/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/23/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN ODI: Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands Location of open dumps on Indian land. Date of Government Version: 12/31/1998 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/03/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/24/2008 Number of Days to Update: 52 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-308-8245 Last EDR Contact: 01/24/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/09/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies DEBRIS REGION 9: Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations A listing of illegal dump sites location on the Torres Martinez Indian Reservation located in eastern Riverside County and northern Imperial County, California. Date of Government Version: 01/12/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/07/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/21/2009 Number of Days to Update: 137 Source: EPA, Region 9 Telephone: 415-947-4219 Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned ODI: Open Dump Inventory An open dump is defined as a disposal facility that does not comply with one or more of the Part 257 or Part 258 Subtitle D Criteria. Date of Government Version: 06/30/1985 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/09/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/17/2004 Number of Days to Update: 39 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 06/09/2004 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned IHS OPEN DUMPS: Open Dumps on Indian Land A listing of all open dumps located on Indian Land in the United States. Date of Government Version: 04/01/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/06/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015 Number of Days to Update: 176 Source: Department of Health & Human Serivces, Indian Health Service Telephone: 301-443-1452 Last EDR Contact: 01/28/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/09/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC06917909.2r Page GR-14 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 614 Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites US HIST CDL: National Clandestine Laboratory Register A listing of clandestine drug lab locations that have been removed from the DEAs National Clandestine Laboratory Register. Date of Government Version: 11/16/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/18/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2022 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: Drug Enforcement Administration Telephone: 202-307-1000 Last EDR Contact: 02/23/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/06/2022 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned HIST CAL-SITES: Calsites Database The Calsites database contains potential or confirmed hazardous substance release properties. In 1996, California EPA reevaluated and significantly reduced the number of sites in the Calsites database. No longer updated by the state agency. It has been replaced by ENVIROSTOR. Date of Government Version: 08/08/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/03/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/24/2006 Number of Days to Update: 21 Source: Department of Toxic Substance Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 02/23/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/25/2009 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SCH: School Property Evaluation Program This category contains proposed and existing school sites that are being evaluated by DTSC for possible hazardous materials contamination. In some cases, these properties may be listed in the CalSites category depending on the level of threat to public health and safety or the environment they pose. Date of Government Version: 10/25/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/14/2022 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 01/25/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/09/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly CDL: Clandestine Drug Labs A listing of drug lab locations. Listing of a location in this database does not indicate that any illegal drug lab materials were or were not present there, and does not constitute a determination that the location either requires or does not require additional cleanup work. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2019 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/20/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/08/2021 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-255-6504 Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies TOXIC PITS: Toxic Pits Cleanup Act Sites Toxic PITS Cleanup Act Sites. TOXIC PITS identifies sites suspected of containing hazardous substances where cleanup has not yet been completed. Date of Government Version: 07/01/1995 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/30/1995 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/26/1995 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-227-4364 Last EDR Contact: 01/26/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/27/2009 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned CERS HAZ WASTE: CERS HAZ WASTE List of sites in the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) Regulated Site Portal which fall under the Hazardous Chemical Management, Hazardous Waste Onsite Treatment, Household Hazardous Waste Collection, Hazardous Waste Generator, and RCRA LQ HW Generator programs. TC06917909.2r Page GR-15 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 615 Date of Government Version: 10/18/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/19/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/12/2022 Number of Days to Update: 85 Source: CalEPA Telephone: 916-323-2514 Last EDR Contact: 01/19/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly US CDL: Clandestine Drug Labs A listing of clandestine drug lab locations. The U.S. Department of Justice ("the Department") provides this web site as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites. In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry and does not guarantee its accuracy. Members of the public must verify the accuracy of all entries by, for example, contacting local law enforcement and local health departments. Date of Government Version: 11/16/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/18/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2022 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: Drug Enforcement Administration Telephone: 202-307-1000 Last EDR Contact: 02/23/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/06/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PFAS: PFAS Contamination Site Location Listing A listing of PFAS contaminated sites included in the GeoTracker database. Date of Government Version: 12/06/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/07/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/23/2022 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 03/08/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/20/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies AQUEOUS FOAM: Former Fire Training Facility Assessments Listing Airports shown on this list are those believed to use Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF), and certified by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) under Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 139 (14 CFR Part 139). This list was created by SWRCB using information available from the FAA. Location points shown are from the latitude and longitude listed on the FAA airport master record. Date of Government Version: 02/20/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/10/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/25/2022 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-341-5455 Last EDR Contact: 03/11/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/20/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks SWEEPS UST: SWEEPS UST Listing Statewide Environmental Evaluation and Planning System. This underground storage tank listing was updated and maintained by a company contacted by the SWRCB in the early 1990’s. The listing is no longer updated or maintained. The local agency is the contact for more information on a site on the SWEEPS list. Date of Government Version: 06/01/1994 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/07/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/11/2005 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/03/2005 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned HIST UST: Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database The Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database is a historical listing of UST sites. Refer to local/county source for current data. Date of Government Version: 10/15/1990 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/25/1991 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/12/1991 Number of Days to Update: 18 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-341-5851 Last EDR Contact: 07/26/2001 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned TC06917909.2r Page GR-16 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 616 SAN FRANCISCO AST: Aboveground Storage Tank Site Listing Aboveground storage tank sites Date of Government Version: 11/04/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/24/2022 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: San Francisco County Department of Public Health Telephone: 415-252-3896 Last EDR Contact: 01/28/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/16/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies CA FID UST: Facility Inventory Database The Facility Inventory Database (FID) contains a historical listing of active and inactive underground storage tank locations from the State Water Resource Control Board. Refer to local/county source for current data. Date of Government Version: 10/31/1994 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/05/1995 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/1995 Number of Days to Update: 24 Source: California Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 916-341-5851 Last EDR Contact: 12/28/1998 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned CERS TANKS: California Environmental Reporting System (CERS) Tanks List of sites in the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) Regulated Site Portal which fall under the Aboveground Petroleum Storage and Underground Storage Tank regulatory programs. Date of Government Version: 10/18/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/19/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/12/2022 Number of Days to Update: 85 Source: California Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 916-323-2514 Last EDR Contact: 01/19/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Local Land Records LIENS: Environmental Liens Listing A listing of property locations with environmental liens for California where DTSC is a lien holder. Date of Government Version: 02/24/2022 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/25/2022 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/09/2022 Number of Days to Update: 12 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 02/24/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/13/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies LIENS 2: CERCLA Lien Information A Federal CERCLA (’Superfund’) lien can exist by operation of law at any site or property at which EPA has spent Superfund monies. These monies are spent to investigate and address releases and threatened releases of contamination. CERCLIS provides information as to the identity of these sites and properties. Date of Government Version: 01/25/2022 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/03/2022 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/22/2022 Number of Days to Update: 19 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-6023 Last EDR Contact: 03/02/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/11/2022 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually DEED: Deed Restriction Listing TC06917909.2r Page GR-17 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 617 Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program Facility Sites with Deed Restrictions & Hazardous Waste Management Program Facility Sites with Deed / Land Use Restriction. The DTSC Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program (SMBRP) list includes sites cleaned up under the program’s oversight and generally does not include current or former hazardous waste facilities that required a hazardous waste facility permit. The list represents deed restrictions that are active. Some sites have multiple deed restrictions. The DTSC Hazardous Waste Management Program (HWMP) has developed a list of current or former hazardous waste facilities that have a recorded land use restriction at the local county recorder’s office. The land use restrictions on this list were required by the DTSC HWMP as a result of the presence of hazardous substances that remain on site after the facility (or part of the facility) has been closed or cleaned up. The types of land use restriction include deed notice, deed restriction, or a land use restriction that binds current and future owners. Date of Government Version: 11/30/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/30/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/16/2022 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: DTSC and SWRCB Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 02/28/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/13/2022 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Records of Emergency Release Reports HMIRS: Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System Hazardous Materials Incident Report System. HMIRS contains hazardous material spill incidents reported to DOT. Date of Government Version: 12/15/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/16/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/10/2022 Number of Days to Update: 84 Source: U.S. Department of Transportation Telephone: 202-366-4555 Last EDR Contact: 03/21/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/04/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly CHMIRS: California Hazardous Material Incident Report System California Hazardous Material Incident Reporting System. CHMIRS contains information on reported hazardous material incidents (accidental releases or spills). Date of Government Version: 09/30/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/19/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/12/2022 Number of Days to Update: 85 Source: Office of Emergency Services Telephone: 916-845-8400 Last EDR Contact: 01/19/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually LDS: Land Disposal Sites Listing (GEOTRACKER) Land Disposal sites (Landfills) included in GeoTracker. GeoTracker is the Water Boards data management system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater. Date of Government Version: 12/06/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/07/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/23/2022 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: State Water Qualilty Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 03/08/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/20/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly MCS: Military Cleanup Sites Listing (GEOTRACKER) Military sites (consisting of: Military UST sites; Military Privatized sites; and Military Cleanup sites [formerly known as DoD non UST]) included in GeoTracker. GeoTracker is the Water Boards data management system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater. Date of Government Version: 12/06/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/07/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/23/2022 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 03/08/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/20/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC06917909.2r Page GR-18 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 618 SPILLS 90: SPILLS90 data from FirstSearch Spills 90 includes those spill and release records available exclusively from FirstSearch databases. Typically, they may include chemical, oil and/or hazardous substance spills recorded after 1990. Duplicate records that are already included in EDR incident and release records are not included in Spills 90. Date of Government Version: 06/06/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/03/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/22/2013 Number of Days to Update: 50 Source: FirstSearch Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned Other Ascertainable Records RCRA NonGen / NLR: RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer Regulated RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste. Date of Government Version: 02/28/2022 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/02/2022 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/17/2022 Number of Days to Update: 15 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 03/02/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/04/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FUDS: Formerly Used Defense Sites The listing includes locations of Formerly Used Defense Sites properties where the US Army Corps of Engineers is actively working or will take necessary cleanup actions. Date of Government Version: 10/26/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/16/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2022 Number of Days to Update: 84 Source: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Telephone: 202-528-4285 Last EDR Contact: 02/15/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/30/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies DOD: Department of Defense Sites This data set consists of federally owned or administered lands, administered by the Department of Defense, that have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres of the United States, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Date of Government Version: 06/07/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/13/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/09/2022 Number of Days to Update: 239 Source: USGS Telephone: 888-275-8747 Last EDR Contact: 03/02/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/25/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies FEDLAND: Federal and Indian Lands Federally and Indian administrated lands of the United States. Lands included are administrated by: Army Corps of Engineers, Bureau of Reclamation, National Wild and Scenic River, National Wildlife Refuge, Public Domain Land, Wilderness, Wilderness Study Area, Wildlife Management Area, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Bureau of Land Management, Department of Justice, Forest Service, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Park Service. Date of Government Version: 04/02/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/11/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/06/2019 Number of Days to Update: 574 Source: U.S. Geological Survey Telephone: 888-275-8747 Last EDR Contact: 01/07/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022 Data Release Frequency: N/A SCRD DRYCLEANERS: State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing The State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners was established in 1998, with support from the U.S. EPA Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation. It is comprised of representatives of states with established drycleaner remediation programs. Currently the member states are Alabama, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Wisconsin. TC06917909.2r Page GR-19 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 619 Date of Government Version: 01/01/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/03/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/07/2017 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 615-532-8599 Last EDR Contact: 02/08/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/23/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies US FIN ASSUR: Financial Assurance Information All owners and operators of facilities that treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste are required to provide proof that they will have sufficient funds to pay for the clean up, closure, and post-closure care of their facilities. Date of Government Version: 12/13/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/17/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/17/2022 Number of Days to Update: 90 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-1917 Last EDR Contact: 03/21/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/04/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly EPA WATCH LIST: EPA WATCH LIST EPA maintains a "Watch List" to facilitate dialogue between EPA, state and local environmental agencies on enforcement matters relating to facilities with alleged violations identified as either significant or high priority. Being on the Watch List does not mean that the facility has actually violated the law only that an investigation by EPA or a state or local environmental agency has led those organizations to allege that an unproven violation has in fact occurred. Being on the Watch List does not represent a higher level of concern regarding the alleged violations that were detected, but instead indicates cases requiring additional dialogue between EPA, state and local agencies - primarily because of the length of time the alleged violation has gone unaddressed or unresolved. Date of Government Version: 08/30/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/21/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/17/2014 Number of Days to Update: 88 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 617-520-3000 Last EDR Contact: 02/01/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/16/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly 2020 COR ACTION: 2020 Corrective Action Program List The EPA has set ambitious goals for the RCRA Corrective Action program by creating the 2020 Corrective Action Universe. This RCRA cleanup baseline includes facilities expected to need corrective action. The 2020 universe contains a wide variety of sites. Some properties are heavily contaminated while others were contaminated but have since been cleaned up. Still others have not been fully investigated yet, and may require little or no remediation. Inclusion in the 2020 Universe does not necessarily imply failure on the part of a facility to meet its RCRA obligations. Date of Government Version: 09/30/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/08/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 73 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-308-4044 Last EDR Contact: 02/03/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/16/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies TSCA: Toxic Substances Control Act Toxic Substances Control Act. TSCA identifies manufacturers and importers of chemical substances included on the TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory list. It includes data on the production volume of these substances by plant site. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/17/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/10/2020 Number of Days to Update: 85 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-260-5521 Last EDR Contact: 03/18/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/27/2022 Data Release Frequency: Every 4 Years TRIS: Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System Toxic Release Inventory System. TRIS identifies facilities which release toxic chemicals to the air, water and land in reportable quantities under SARA Title III Section 313. TC06917909.2r Page GR-20 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 620 Date of Government Version: 12/31/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/14/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/04/2020 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-0250 Last EDR Contact: 02/18/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/30/2022 Data Release Frequency: Annually SSTS: Section 7 Tracking Systems Section 7 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, as amended (92 Stat. 829) requires all registered pesticide-producing establishments to submit a report to the Environmental Protection Agency by March 1st each year. Each establishment must report the types and amounts of pesticides, active ingredients and devices being produced, and those having been produced and sold or distributed in the past year. Date of Government Version: 10/18/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/20/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2022 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4203 Last EDR Contact: 01/19/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022 Data Release Frequency: Annually ROD: Records Of Decision Record of Decision. ROD documents mandate a permanent remedy at an NPL (Superfund) site containing technical and health information to aid in the cleanup. Date of Government Version: 01/25/2022 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/03/2022 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/22/2022 Number of Days to Update: 19 Source: EPA Telephone: 703-416-0223 Last EDR Contact: 03/02/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/13/2022 Data Release Frequency: Annually RMP: Risk Management Plans When Congress passed the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, it required EPA to publish regulations and guidance for chemical accident prevention at facilities using extremely hazardous substances. The Risk Management Program Rule (RMP Rule) was written to implement Section 112(r) of these amendments. The rule, which built upon existing industry codes and standards, requires companies of all sizes that use certain flammable and toxic substances to develop a Risk Management Program, which includes a(n): Hazard assessment that details the potential effects of an accidental release, an accident history of the last five years, and an evaluation of worst-case and alternative accidental releases; Prevention program that includes safety precautions and maintenance, monitoring, and employee training measures; and Emergency response program that spells out emergency health care, employee training measures and procedures for informing the public and response agencies (e.g the fire department) should an accident occur. Date of Government Version: 10/20/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/12/2021 Number of Days to Update: 7 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-8600 Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies RAATS: RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System RCRA Administration Action Tracking System. RAATS contains records based on enforcement actions issued under RCRA pertaining to major violators and includes administrative and civil actions brought by the EPA. For administration actions after September 30, 1995, data entry in the RAATS database was discontinued. EPA will retain a copy of the database for historical records. It was necessary to terminate RAATS because a decrease in agency resources made it impossible to continue to update the information contained in the database. Date of Government Version: 04/17/1995 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/03/1995 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/07/1995 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4104 Last EDR Contact: 06/02/2008 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/01/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned TC06917909.2r Page GR-21 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 621 PRP: Potentially Responsible Parties A listing of verified Potentially Responsible Parties Date of Government Version: 01/25/2022 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/03/2022 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/25/2022 Number of Days to Update: 22 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-6023 Last EDR Contact: 03/02/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/16/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PADS: PCB Activity Database System PCB Activity Database. PADS Identifies generators, transporters, commercial storers and/or brokers and disposers of PCB’s who are required to notify the EPA of such activities. Date of Government Version: 01/20/2022 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/20/2022 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/25/2022 Number of Days to Update: 64 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-0500 Last EDR Contact: 01/07/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022 Data Release Frequency: Annually ICIS: Integrated Compliance Information System The Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) supports the information needs of the national enforcement and compliance program as well as the unique needs of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program. Date of Government Version: 11/18/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/23/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2017 Number of Days to Update: 79 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2501 Last EDR Contact: 12/29/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FTTS: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) FTTS tracks administrative cases and pesticide enforcement actions and compliance activities related to FIFRA, TSCA and EPCRA (Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act). To maintain currency, EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis. Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009 Number of Days to Update: 25 Source: EPA/Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances Telephone: 202-566-1667 Last EDR Contact: 08/18/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned FTTS INSP: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) A listing of FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) inspections and enforcements. Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009 Number of Days to Update: 25 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-1667 Last EDR Contact: 08/18/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned MLTS: Material Licensing Tracking System MLTS is maintained by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and contains a list of approximately 8,100 sites which possess or use radioactive materials and which are subject to NRC licensing requirements. To maintain currency, EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis. Date of Government Version: 07/29/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/24/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/19/2021 Number of Days to Update: 87 Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission Telephone: 301-415-7169 Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC06917909.2r Page GR-22 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 622 COAL ASH DOE: Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data A listing of power plants that store ash in surface ponds. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/30/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/22/2022 Number of Days to Update: 84 Source: Department of Energy Telephone: 202-586-8719 Last EDR Contact: 02/28/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/13/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies COAL ASH EPA: Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List A listing of coal combustion residues surface impoundments with high hazard potential ratings. Date of Government Version: 01/12/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/05/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/11/2019 Number of Days to Update: 251 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 02/28/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/13/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies PCB TRANSFORMER: PCB Transformer Registration Database The database of PCB transformer registrations that includes all PCB registration submittals. Date of Government Version: 09/13/2019 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/06/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2020 Number of Days to Update: 96 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-0517 Last EDR Contact: 02/04/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/16/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies RADINFO: Radiation Information Database The Radiation Information Database (RADINFO) contains information about facilities that are regulated by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations for radiation and radioactivity. Date of Government Version: 07/01/2019 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/23/2019 Number of Days to Update: 84 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-343-9775 Last EDR Contact: 03/28/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/11/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly HIST FTTS: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing A complete administrative case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated. Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2501 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2007 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned HIST FTTS INSP: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Inspection & Enforcement Case Listing A complete inspection and enforcement case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated. TC06917909.2r Page GR-23 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 623 Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2501 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2008 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned DOT OPS: Incident and Accident Data Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Incident and Accident data. Date of Government Version: 01/02/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/28/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/17/2020 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Telephone: 202-366-4595 Last EDR Contact: 01/24/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/08/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly CONSENT: Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees Major legal settlements that establish responsibility and standards for cleanup at NPL (Superfund) sites. Released periodically by United States District Courts after settlement by parties to litigation matters. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/14/2022 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/25/2022 Number of Days to Update: 70 Source: Department of Justice, Consent Decree Library Telephone: Varies Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies BRS: Biennial Reporting System The Biennial Reporting System is a national system administered by the EPA that collects data on the generation and management of hazardous waste. BRS captures detailed data from two groups: Large Quantity Generators (LQG) and Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2019 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/02/2022 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/25/2022 Number of Days to Update: 23 Source: EPA/NTIS Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 03/02/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/04/2022 Data Release Frequency: Biennially INDIAN RESERV: Indian Reservations This map layer portrays Indian administered lands of the United States that have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/14/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2017 Number of Days to Update: 546 Source: USGS Telephone: 202-208-3710 Last EDR Contact: 01/04/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually FUSRAP: Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program DOE established the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) in 1974 to remediate sites where radioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) operations. Date of Government Version: 07/26/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/27/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/22/2021 Number of Days to Update: 87 Source: Department of Energy Telephone: 202-586-3559 Last EDR Contact: 01/31/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/16/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies UMTRA: Uranium Mill Tailings Sites Uranium ore was mined by private companies for federal government use in national defense programs. When the mills shut down, large piles of the sand-like material (mill tailings) remain after uranium has been extracted from the ore. Levels of human exposure to radioactive materials from the piles are low; however, in some cases tailings were used as construction materials before the potential health hazards of the tailings were recognized. TC06917909.2r Page GR-24 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 624 Date of Government Version: 08/30/2019 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/28/2020 Number of Days to Update: 74 Source: Department of Energy Telephone: 505-845-0011 Last EDR Contact: 02/17/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/30/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies LEAD SMELTER 1: Lead Smelter Sites A listing of former lead smelter site locations. Date of Government Version: 01/25/2022 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/03/2022 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/22/2022 Number of Days to Update: 19 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-8787 Last EDR Contact: 05/03/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/11/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies LEAD SMELTER 2: Lead Smelter Sites A list of several hundred sites in the U.S. where secondary lead smelting was done from 1931and 1964. These sites may pose a threat to public health through ingestion or inhalation of contaminated soil or dust Date of Government Version: 04/05/2001 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/27/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/02/2010 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: American Journal of Public Health Telephone: 703-305-6451 Last EDR Contact: 12/02/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned US AIRS (AFS): Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem (AFS) The database is a sub-system of Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS). AFS contains compliance data on air pollution point sources regulated by the U.S. EPA and/or state and local air regulatory agencies. This information comes from source reports by various stationary sources of air pollution, such as electric power plants, steel mills, factories, and universities, and provides information about the air pollutants they produce. Action, air program, air program pollutant, and general level plant data. It is used to track emissions and compliance data from industrial plants. Date of Government Version: 10/12/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/03/2017 Number of Days to Update: 100 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-2496 Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/08/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually US AIRS MINOR: Air Facility System Data A listing of minor source facilities. Date of Government Version: 10/12/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/03/2017 Number of Days to Update: 100 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-2496 Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/08/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually MINES VIOLATIONS: MSHA Violation Assessment Data Mines violation and assessment information. Department of Labor, Mine Safety & Health Administration. Date of Government Version: 03/21/2022 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/22/2022 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/25/2022 Number of Days to Update: 3 Source: DOL, Mine Safety & Health Admi Telephone: 202-693-9424 Last EDR Contact: 03/14/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/13/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly US MINES: Mines Master Index File Contains all mine identification numbers issued for mines active or opened since 1971. The data also includes violation information. TC06917909.2r Page GR-25 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 625 Date of Government Version: 11/02/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/22/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/14/2022 Number of Days to Update: 84 Source: Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration Telephone: 303-231-5959 Last EDR Contact: 02/23/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/06/2022 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually US MINES 2: Ferrous and Nonferrous Metal Mines Database Listing This map layer includes ferrous (ferrous metal mines are facilities that extract ferrous metals, such as iron ore or molybdenum) and nonferrous (Nonferrous metal mines are facilities that extract nonferrous metals, such as gold, silver, copper, zinc, and lead) metal mines in the United States. Date of Government Version: 05/06/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/27/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/13/2020 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: USGS Telephone: 703-648-7709 Last EDR Contact: 02/24/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/06/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies US MINES 3: Active Mines & Mineral Plants Database Listing Active Mines and Mineral Processing Plant operations for commodities monitored by the Minerals Information Team of the USGS. Date of Government Version: 04/14/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/08/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/13/2011 Number of Days to Update: 97 Source: USGS Telephone: 703-648-7709 Last EDR Contact: 02/24/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/06/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies ABANDONED MINES: Abandoned Mines An inventory of land and water impacted by past mining (primarily coal mining) is maintained by OSMRE to provide information needed to implement the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA). The inventory contains information on the location, type, and extent of AML impacts, as well as, information on the cost associated with the reclamation of those problems. The inventory is based upon field surveys by State, Tribal, and OSMRE program officials. It is dynamic to the extent that it is modified as new problems are identified and existing problems are reclaimed. Date of Government Version: 12/14/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/15/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/10/2022 Number of Days to Update: 85 Source: Department of Interior Telephone: 202-208-2609 Last EDR Contact: 03/04/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/20/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FINDS: Facility Index System/Facility Registry System Facility Index System. FINDS contains both facility information and ’pointers’ to other sources that contain more detail. EDR includes the following FINDS databases in this report: PCS (Permit Compliance System), AIRS (Aerometric Information Retrieval System), DOCKET (Enforcement Docket used to manage and track information on civil judicial enforcement cases for all environmental statutes), FURS (Federal Underground Injection Control), C-DOCKET (Criminal Docket System used to track criminal enforcement actions for all environmental statutes), FFIS (Federal Facilities Information System), STATE (State Environmental Laws and Statutes), and PADS (PCB Activity Data System). Date of Government Version: 11/04/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/22/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/25/2022 Number of Days to Update: 95 Source: EPA Telephone: (415) 947-8000 Last EDR Contact: 02/28/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/13/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly UXO: Unexploded Ordnance Sites A listing of unexploded ordnance site locations Date of Government Version: 12/31/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/11/2022 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/14/2022 Number of Days to Update: 34 Source: Department of Defense Telephone: 703-704-1564 Last EDR Contact: 01/11/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/25/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC06917909.2r Page GR-26 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 626 ECHO: Enforcement & Compliance History Information ECHO provides integrated compliance and enforcement information for about 800,000 regulated facilities nationwide. Date of Government Version: 01/01/2022 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/04/2022 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2022 Number of Days to Update: 6 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2280 Last EDR Contact: 01/04/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly DOCKET HWC: Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing A complete list of the Federal Agency Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Facilities. Date of Government Version: 05/06/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/21/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/11/2021 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-0527 Last EDR Contact: 02/22/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/06/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies FUELS PROGRAM: EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing This listing includes facilities that are registered under the Part 80 (Code of Federal Regulations) EPA Fuels Programs. All companies now are required to submit new and updated registrations. Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/01/2022 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: EPA Telephone: 800-385-6164 Last EDR Contact: 02/17/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/30/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly CA BOND EXP. PLAN: Bond Expenditure Plan Department of Health Services developed a site-specific expenditure plan as the basis for an appropriation of Hazardous Substance Cleanup Bond Act funds. It is not updated. Date of Government Version: 01/01/1989 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/27/1994 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/02/1994 Number of Days to Update: 6 Source: Department of Health Services Telephone: 916-255-2118 Last EDR Contact: 05/31/1994 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned CORTESE: "Cortese" Hazardous Waste & Substances Sites List The sites for the list are designated by the State Water Resource Control Board (LUST), the Integrated Waste Board (SWF/LS), and the Department of Toxic Substances Control (Cal-Sites). Date of Government Version: 12/16/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/16/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/03/2022 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: CAL EPA/Office of Emergency Information Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 03/21/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/04/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly CUPA LIVERMORE-PLEASANTON: CUPA Facility Listing list of facilities associated with the various CUPA programs in Livermore-Pleasanton Date of Government Version: 05/01/2019 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/14/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/17/2019 Number of Days to Update: 64 Source: Livermore-Pleasanton Fire Department Telephone: 925-454-2361 Last EDR Contact: 02/08/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/23/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies DRYCLEANERS: Cleaner Facilities A list of drycleaner related facilities that have EPA ID numbers. These are facilities with certain SIC codes: power laundries, family and commercial; garment pressing and cleaner’s agents; linen supply; coin-operated laundries and cleaning; drycleaning plants, except rugs; carpet and upholster cleaning; industrial launderers; laundry and garment services. TC06917909.2r Page GR-27 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 627 Date of Government Version: 08/27/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/01/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/19/2021 Number of Days to Update: 79 Source: Department of Toxic Substance Control Telephone: 916-327-4498 Last EDR Contact: 02/07/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/13/2022 Data Release Frequency: Annually DRYCLEAN SOUTH COAST: South Coast Air Quality Management District Drycleaner Listing A listing of dry cleaners in the South Coast Air Quality Management District Date of Government Version: 11/17/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/18/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/07/2022 Number of Days to Update: 81 Source: South Coast Air Quality Management District Telephone: 909-396-3211 Last EDR Contact: 02/17/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/06/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies DRYCLEAN AVAQMD: Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District Drycleaner Listing A listing of dry cleaners in the Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District. Date of Government Version: 11/29/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/29/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/14/2022 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District Telephone: 661-723-8070 Last EDR Contact: 02/24/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/13/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies EMI: Emissions Inventory Data Toxics and criteria pollutant emissions data collected by the ARB and local air pollution agencies. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2019 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/10/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/27/2021 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: California Air Resources Board Telephone: 916-322-2990 Last EDR Contact: 03/18/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/27/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies ENF: Enforcement Action Listing A listing of Water Board Enforcement Actions. Formal is everything except Oral/Verbal Communication, Notice of Violation, Expedited Payment Letter, and Staff Enforcement Letter. Date of Government Version: 11/10/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/11/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/03/2022 Number of Days to Update: 84 Source: State Water Resoruces Control Board Telephone: 916-445-9379 Last EDR Contact: 03/03/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies Financial Assurance 1: Financial Assurance Information Listing Financial Assurance information Date of Government Version: 10/05/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/06/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/29/2021 Number of Days to Update: 84 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-255-3628 Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies Financial Assurance 2: Financial Assurance Information Listing A listing of financial assurance information for solid waste facilities. Financial assurance is intended to ensure that resources are available to pay for the cost of closure, post-closure care, and corrective measures if the owner or operator of a regulated facility is unable or unwilling to pay. Date of Government Version: 11/18/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/19/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/07/2022 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: California Integrated Waste Management Board Telephone: 916-341-6066 Last EDR Contact: 02/17/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/23/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC06917909.2r Page GR-28 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 628 HAZNET: Facility and Manifest Data Facility and Manifest Data. The data is extracted from the copies of hazardous waste manifests received each year by the DTSC. The annual volume of manifests is typically 700,000 - 1,000,000 annually, representing approximately 350,000 - 500,000 shipments. Data are from the manifests submitted without correction, and therefore many contain some invalid values for data elements such as generator ID, TSD ID, waste category, and disposal method. This database begins with calendar year 1993. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2019 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/15/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/02/2020 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: California Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 916-255-1136 Last EDR Contact: 01/07/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022 Data Release Frequency: Annually ICE: ICE Contains data pertaining to the Permitted Facilities with Inspections / Enforcements sites tracked in Envirostor. Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/03/2022 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: Department of Toxic Subsances Control Telephone: 877-786-9427 Last EDR Contact: 02/15/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/30/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly HIST CORTESE: Hazardous Waste & Substance Site List The sites for the list are designated by the State Water Resource Control Board [LUST], the Integrated Waste Board [SWF/LS], and the Department of Toxic Substances Control [CALSITES]. This listing is no longer updated by the state agency. Date of Government Version: 04/01/2001 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/22/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/08/2009 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 01/22/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned HWP: EnviroStor Permitted Facilities Listing Detailed information on permitted hazardous waste facilities and corrective action ("cleanups") tracked in EnviroStor. Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/03/2022 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 02/15/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/30/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly HWT: Registered Hazardous Waste Transporter Database A listing of hazardous waste transporters. In California, unless specifically exempted, it is unlawful for any person to transport hazardous wastes unless the person holds a valid registration issued by DTSC. A hazardous waste transporter registration is valid for one year and is assigned a unique registration number. Date of Government Version: 01/03/2022 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/04/2022 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/18/2022 Number of Days to Update: 73 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-440-7145 Last EDR Contact: 01/04/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly MINES: Mines Site Location Listing A listing of mine site locations from the Office of Mine Reclamation. Date of Government Version: 12/06/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/07/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/23/2022 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: Department of Conservation Telephone: 916-322-1080 Last EDR Contact: 03/08/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/20/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC06917909.2r Page GR-29 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 629 MWMP: Medical Waste Management Program Listing The Medical Waste Management Program (MWMP) ensures the proper handling and disposal of medical waste by permitting and inspecting medical waste Offsite Treatment Facilities (PDF) and Transfer Stations (PDF) throughout the state. MWMP also oversees all Medical Waste Transporters. Date of Government Version: 11/18/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/30/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/17/2022 Number of Days to Update: 79 Source: Department of Public Health Telephone: 916-558-1784 Last EDR Contact: 02/28/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/13/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies NPDES: NPDES Permits Listing A listing of NPDES permits, including stormwater. Date of Government Version: 11/09/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/09/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/27/2022 Number of Days to Update: 79 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-445-9379 Last EDR Contact: 02/08/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/23/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PEST LIC: Pesticide Regulation Licenses Listing A listing of licenses and certificates issued by the Department of Pesticide Regulation. The DPR issues licenses and/or certificates to: Persons and businesses that apply or sell pesticides; Pest control dealers and brokers; Persons who advise on agricultural pesticide applications. Date of Government Version: 11/30/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/30/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/17/2022 Number of Days to Update: 79 Source: Department of Pesticide Regulation Telephone: 916-445-4038 Last EDR Contact: 02/28/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/13/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PROC: Certified Processors Database A listing of certified processors. Date of Government Version: 11/29/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/29/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/11/2022 Number of Days to Update: 74 Source: Department of Conservation Telephone: 916-323-3836 Last EDR Contact: 03/08/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/20/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly NOTIFY 65: Proposition 65 Records Listings of all Proposition 65 incidents reported to counties by the State Water Resources Control Board and the Regional Water Quality Control Board. This database is no longer updated by the reporting agency. Date of Government Version: 12/13/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/14/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/03/2022 Number of Days to Update: 79 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-445-3846 Last EDR Contact: 03/09/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/26/2022 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned UIC: UIC Listing A listing of wells identified as underground injection wells, in the California Oil and Gas Wells database. Date of Government Version: 12/03/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/07/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/24/2022 Number of Days to Update: 79 Source: Deaprtment of Conservation Telephone: 916-445-2408 Last EDR Contact: 03/08/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/20/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC06917909.2r Page GR-30 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 630 UIC GEO: Underground Injection Control Sites (GEOTRACKER) Underground control injection sites Date of Government Version: 12/06/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/07/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/23/2022 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: State Water Resource Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 03/08/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/20/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies WASTEWATER PITS: Oil Wastewater Pits Listing Water officials discovered that oil producers have been dumping chemical-laden wastewater into hundreds of unlined pits that are operating without proper permits. Inspections completed by the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board revealed the existence of previously unidentified waste sites. The water boards review found that more than one-third of the region’s active disposal pits are operating without permission. Date of Government Version: 02/11/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2021 Number of Days to Update: 90 Source: RWQCB, Central Valley Region Telephone: 559-445-5577 Last EDR Contact: 01/07/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies WDS: Waste Discharge System Sites which have been issued waste discharge requirements. Date of Government Version: 06/19/2007 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/20/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/29/2007 Number of Days to Update: 9 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-341-5227 Last EDR Contact: 02/11/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/30/2022 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned WIP: Well Investigation Program Case List Well Investigation Program case in the San Gabriel and San Fernando Valley area. Date of Government Version: 07/03/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/21/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/03/2009 Number of Days to Update: 13 Source: Los Angeles Water Quality Control Board Telephone: 213-576-6726 Last EDR Contact: 03/16/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/04/2022 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned MILITARY PRIV SITES: Military Privatized Sites (GEOTRACKER) Military privatized sites Date of Government Version: 12/06/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/07/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/23/2022 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 03/08/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/20/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies PROJECT: Project Sites (GEOTRACKER) Projects sites Date of Government Version: 12/06/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/07/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/23/2022 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 03/08/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/20/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies WDR: Waste Discharge Requirements Listing In general, the Waste Discharge Requirements (WDRs) Program (sometimes also referred to as the "Non Chapter 15 (Non 15) Program") regulates point discharges that are exempt pursuant to Subsection 20090 of Title 27 and not subject to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act. Exemptions from Title 27 may be granted for nine categories of discharges (e.g., sewage, wastewater, etc.) that meet, and continue to meet, the preconditions listed for each specific exemption. The scope of the WDRs Program also includes the discharge of wastes classified as inert, pursuant to section 20230 of Title 27. TC06917909.2r Page GR-31 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 631 Date of Government Version: 12/06/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/07/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/23/2022 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-341-5810 Last EDR Contact: 03/08/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/20/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly CIWQS: California Integrated Water Quality System The California Integrated Water Quality System (CIWQS) is a computer system used by the State and Regional Water Quality Control Boards to track information about places of environmental interest, manage permits and other orders, track inspections, and manage violations and enforcement activities. Date of Government Version: 11/30/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/30/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/16/2022 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-794-4977 Last EDR Contact: 02/28/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/13/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies CERS: CalEPA Regulated Site Portal Data The CalEPA Regulated Site Portal database combines data about environmentally regulated sites and facilities in California into a single database. It combines data from a variety of state and federal databases, and provides an overview of regulated activities across the spectrum of environmental programs for any given location in California. These activities include hazardous materials and waste, state and federal cleanups, impacted ground and surface waters, and toxic materials Date of Government Version: 10/18/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/19/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/12/2022 Number of Days to Update: 85 Source: California Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 916-323-2514 Last EDR Contact: 01/19/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies NON-CASE INFO: Non-Case Information Sites (GEOTRACKER) Non-Case Information sites Date of Government Version: 12/06/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/07/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/23/2022 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 03/08/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/20/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies OTHER OIL GAS: Other Oil & Gas Projects Sites (GEOTRACKER) Other Oil & Gas Projects sites Date of Government Version: 12/06/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/07/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/23/2022 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 03/08/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/20/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies PROD WATER PONDS: Produced Water Ponds Sites (GEOTRACKER) Produced water ponds sites Date of Government Version: 12/06/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/07/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/23/2022 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 03/08/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/20/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies SAMPLING POINT: Sampling Point ? Public Sites (GEOTRACKER) Sampling point - public sites TC06917909.2r Page GR-32 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 632 Date of Government Version: 12/06/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/07/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/23/2022 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 03/08/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/20/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies WELL STIM PROJ: Well Stimulation Project (GEOTRACKER) Includes areas of groundwater monitoring plans, a depiction of the monitoring network, and the facilities, boundaries, and subsurface characteristics of the oilfield and the features (oil and gas wells, produced water ponds, UIC wells, water supply wells, etc?) being monitored Date of Government Version: 12/06/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/07/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/23/2022 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 03/08/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/20/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies PCS INACTIVE: Listing of Inactive PCS Permits An inactive permit is a facility that has shut down or is no longer discharging. Date of Government Version: 11/05/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/06/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/06/2015 Number of Days to Update: 120 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-2496 Last EDR Contact: 12/29/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually PCS: Permit Compliance System PCS is a computerized management information system that contains data on National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit holding facilities. PCS tracks the permit, compliance, and enforcement status of NPDES facilities. Date of Government Version: 07/14/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/05/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2011 Number of Days to Update: 55 Source: EPA, Office of Water Telephone: 202-564-2496 Last EDR Contact: 12/29/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually MINES MRDS: Mineral Resources Data System Mineral Resources Data System Date of Government Version: 04/06/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/21/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/24/2019 Number of Days to Update: 3 Source: USGS Telephone: 703-648-6533 Last EDR Contact: 02/24/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/06/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies HWTS: Hazardous Waste Tracking System DTSC maintains the Hazardous Waste Tracking System that stores ID number information since the early 1980s and manifest data since 1993. The system collects both manifest copies from the generator and destination facility. Date of Government Version: 07/13/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/14/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/06/2021 Number of Days to Update: 84 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-324-2444 Last EDR Contact: 01/28/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies PCS ENF: Enforcement data No description is available for this data TC06917909.2r Page GR-33 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 633 Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/05/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/06/2015 Number of Days to Update: 29 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-2497 Last EDR Contact: 12/29/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records EDR MGP: EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants The EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plant Database includes records of coal gas plants (manufactured gas plants) compiled by EDR’s researchers. Manufactured gas sites were used in the United States from the 1800’s to 1950’s to produce a gas that could be distributed and used as fuel. These plants used whale oil, rosin, coal, or a mixture of coal, oil, and water that also produced a significant amount of waste. Many of the byproducts of the gas production, such as coal tar (oily waste containing volatile and non-volatile chemicals), sludges, oils and other compounds are potentially hazardous to human health and the environment. The byproduct from this process was frequently disposed of directly at the plant site and can remain or spread slowly, serving as a continuous source of soil and groundwater contamination. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A Source: EDR, Inc. Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned EDR Hist Auto: EDR Exclusive Historical Auto Stations EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential gas station/filling station/service station sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR’s opinion, include gas station/filling station/service station establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to gas, gas station, gasoline station, filling station, auto, automobile repair, auto service station, service station, etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR’s HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A Source: EDR, Inc. Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies EDR Hist Cleaner: EDR Exclusive Historical Cleaners EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential dry cleaner sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR’s opinion, include dry cleaning establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to dry cleaners, cleaners, laundry, laundromat, cleaning/laundry, wash & dry etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR’s HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A Source: EDR, Inc. Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives TC06917909.2r Page GR-34 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 634 RGA LF: Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List The EDR Recovered Government Archive Landfill database provides a list of landfills derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled from Records formerly available from the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery in California. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/13/2014 Number of Days to Update: 196 Source: Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies RGA LUST: Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank The EDR Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank database provides a list of LUST incidents derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled from Records formerly available from the State Water Resources Control Board in California. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/30/2013 Number of Days to Update: 182 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies COUNTY RECORDS ALAMEDA COUNTY: CS ALAMEDA: Contaminated Sites A listing of contaminated sites overseen by the Toxic Release Program (oil and groundwater contamination from chemical releases and spills) and the Leaking Underground Storage Tank Program (soil and ground water contamination from leaking petroleum USTs). Date of Government Version: 01/09/2019 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/11/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/05/2019 Number of Days to Update: 53 Source: Alameda County Environmental Health Services Telephone: 510-567-6700 Last EDR Contact: 12/28/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually UST ALAMEDA: Underground Tanks Underground storage tank sites located in Alameda county. Date of Government Version: 12/28/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/28/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/18/2022 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: Alameda County Environmental Health Services Telephone: 510-567-6700 Last EDR Contact: 12/28/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually AMADOR COUNTY: CUPA AMADOR: CUPA Facility List Cupa Facility List Date of Government Version: 11/01/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/02/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/24/2022 Number of Days to Update: 83 Source: Amador County Environmental Health Telephone: 209-223-6439 Last EDR Contact: 01/28/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/16/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies BUTTE COUNTY: TC06917909.2r Page GR-35 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 635 CUPA BUTTE: CUPA Facility Listing Cupa facility list. Date of Government Version: 04/21/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/25/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/09/2017 Number of Days to Update: 106 Source: Public Health Department Telephone: 530-538-7149 Last EDR Contact: 12/28/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned CALVERAS COUNTY: CUPA CALVERAS: CUPA Facility Listing Cupa Facility Listing Date of Government Version: 12/28/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/28/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/18/2022 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: Calveras County Environmental Health Telephone: 209-754-6399 Last EDR Contact: 03/17/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/04/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly COLUSA COUNTY: CUPA COLUSA: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list. Date of Government Version: 04/06/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/23/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/10/2020 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: Health & Human Services Telephone: 530-458-0396 Last EDR Contact: 01/28/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/16/2022 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually CONTRA COSTA COUNTY: SL CONTRA COSTA: Site List List includes sites from the underground tank, hazardous waste generator and business plan/2185 programs. Date of Government Version: 10/22/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/19/2022 Number of Days to Update: 85 Source: Contra Costa Health Services Department Telephone: 925-646-2286 Last EDR Contact: 01/24/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/09/2022 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually DEL NORTE COUNTY: CUPA DEL NORTE: CUPA Facility List Cupa Facility list Date of Government Version: 10/01/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/02/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/24/2022 Number of Days to Update: 83 Source: Del Norte County Environmental Health Division Telephone: 707-465-0426 Last EDR Contact: 01/24/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/09/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies EL DORADO COUNTY: TC06917909.2r Page GR-36 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 636 CUPA EL DORADO: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility list. Date of Government Version: 11/30/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/01/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/16/2022 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: El Dorado County Environmental Management Department Telephone: 530-621-6623 Last EDR Contact: 02/07/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/09/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies FRESNO COUNTY: CUPA FRESNO: CUPA Resources List Certified Unified Program Agency. CUPA’s are responsible for implementing a unified hazardous materials and hazardous waste management regulatory program. The agency provides oversight of businesses that deal with hazardous materials, operate underground storage tanks or aboveground storage tanks. Date of Government Version: 06/28/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/21/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/03/2022 Number of Days to Update: 72 Source: Dept. of Community Health Telephone: 559-445-3271 Last EDR Contact: 12/21/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/11/2022 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually GLENN COUNTY: CUPA GLENN: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 01/22/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/24/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/14/2018 Number of Days to Update: 49 Source: Glenn County Air Pollution Control District Telephone: 830-934-6500 Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned HUMBOLDT COUNTY: CUPA HUMBOLDT: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility list. Date of Government Version: 08/12/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/12/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/08/2021 Number of Days to Update: 88 Source: Humboldt County Environmental Health Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 02/11/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/30/2022 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually IMPERIAL COUNTY: CUPA IMPERIAL: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list. Date of Government Version: 10/18/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/20/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/12/2022 Number of Days to Update: 84 Source: San Diego Border Field Office Telephone: 760-339-2777 Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies INYO COUNTY: TC06917909.2r Page GR-37 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 637 CUPA INYO: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list. Date of Government Version: 04/02/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/03/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/14/2018 Number of Days to Update: 72 Source: Inyo County Environmental Health Services Telephone: 760-878-0238 Last EDR Contact: 02/11/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/30/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies KERN COUNTY: CUPA KERN: CUPA Facility List A listing of sites included in the Kern County Hazardous Material Business Plan. Date of Government Version: 11/10/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/12/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/02/2022 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: Kern County Public Health Telephone: 661-321-3000 Last EDR Contact: 01/28/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/16/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies UST KERN: Underground Storage Tank Sites & Tank Listing Kern County Sites and Tanks Listing. Date of Government Version: 11/10/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/12/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/02/2022 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: Kern County Environment Health Services Department Telephone: 661-862-8700 Last EDR Contact: 01/28/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/16/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly KINGS COUNTY: CUPA KINGS: CUPA Facility List A listing of sites included in the county’s Certified Unified Program Agency database. California’s Secretary for Environmental Protection established the unified hazardous materials and hazardous waste regulatory program as required by chapter 6.11 of the California Health and Safety Code. The Unified Program consolidates the administration, permits, inspections, and enforcement activities. Date of Government Version: 12/03/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/26/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/14/2021 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: Kings County Department of Public Health Telephone: 559-584-1411 Last EDR Contact: 03/24/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/30/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies LAKE COUNTY: CUPA LAKE: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 11/04/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/24/2022 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: Lake County Environmental Health Telephone: 707-263-1164 Last EDR Contact: 01/10/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/25/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies LASSEN COUNTY: TC06917909.2r Page GR-38 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 638 CUPA LASSEN: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 07/31/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/21/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/09/2020 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: Lassen County Environmental Health Telephone: 530-251-8528 Last EDR Contact: 03/10/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies LOS ANGELES COUNTY: AOCONCERN: Key Areas of Concerns in Los Angeles County San Gabriel Valley areas where VOC contamination is at or above the MCL as designated by region 9 EPA office. Date of Government Version: 3/30/2009 Exide Site area is a cleanup plan of lead-impacted soil surrounding the former Exide Facility as designated by the DTSC. Date of Government Version: 7/17/2017 Date of Government Version: 03/30/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/31/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/23/2009 Number of Days to Update: 206 Source: N/A Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 03/10/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/27/2022 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned HMS LOS ANGELES: HMS: Street Number List Industrial Waste and Underground Storage Tank Sites. Date of Government Version: 10/14/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/19/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/13/2022 Number of Days to Update: 86 Source: Department of Public Works Telephone: 626-458-3517 Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually LF LOS ANGELES: List of Solid Waste Facilities Solid Waste Facilities in Los Angeles County. Date of Government Version: 10/08/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/08/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/29/2021 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: La County Department of Public Works Telephone: 818-458-5185 Last EDR Contact: 01/11/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/25/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies LF LOS ANGELES CITY: City of Los Angeles Landfills Landfills owned and maintained by the City of Los Angeles. Date of Government Version: 01/01/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/18/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/10/2021 Number of Days to Update: 81 Source: Engineering & Construction Division Telephone: 213-473-7869 Last EDR Contact: 01/07/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/25/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies LOS ANGELES AST: Active & Inactive AST Inventory A listing of active & inactive above ground petroleum storage tank site locations, located in the City of Los Angeles. Date of Government Version: 06/01/2019 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/25/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/22/2019 Number of Days to Update: 58 Source: Los Angeles Fire Department Telephone: 213-978-3800 Last EDR Contact: 03/23/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/04/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC06917909.2r Page GR-39 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 639 LOS ANGELES CO LF METHANE: Methane Producing Landfills This data was created on April 30, 2012 to represent known disposal sites in Los Angeles County that may produce and emanate methane gas. The shapefile contains disposal sites within Los Angeles County that once accepted degradable refuse material. Information used to create this data was extracted from a landfill survey performed by County Engineers (Major Waste System Map, 1973) as well as historical records from CalRecycle, Regional Water Quality Control Board, and Los Angeles County Department of Public Health Date of Government Version: 10/12/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/13/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2022 Number of Days to Update: 83 Source: Los Angeles County Department of Public Works Telephone: 626-458-6973 Last EDR Contact: 01/07/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/25/2022 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LOS ANGELES HM: Active & Inactive Hazardous Materials Inventory A listing of active & inactive hazardous materials facility locations, located in the City of Los Angeles. Date of Government Version: 04/19/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/17/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/28/2021 Number of Days to Update: 11 Source: Los Angeles Fire Department Telephone: 213-978-3800 Last EDR Contact: 03/21/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/04/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies LOS ANGELES UST: Active & Inactive UST Inventory A listing of active & inactive underground storage tank site locations and underground storage tank historical sites, located in the City of Los Angeles. Date of Government Version: 04/19/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/17/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/14/2021 Number of Days to Update: 89 Source: Los Angeles Fire Department Telephone: 213-978-3800 Last EDR Contact: 03/21/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/04/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies SITE MIT LOS ANGELES: Site Mitigation List Industrial sites that have had some sort of spill or complaint. Date of Government Version: 05/26/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/09/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2021 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: Community Health Services Telephone: 323-890-7806 Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/24/2022 Data Release Frequency: Annually UST EL SEGUNDO: City of El Segundo Underground Storage Tank Underground storage tank sites located in El Segundo city. Date of Government Version: 01/21/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/19/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/10/2017 Number of Days to Update: 21 Source: City of El Segundo Fire Department Telephone: 310-524-2236 Last EDR Contact: 01/07/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/25/2022 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned UST LONG BEACH: City of Long Beach Underground Storage Tank Underground storage tank sites located in the city of Long Beach. Date of Government Version: 04/22/2019 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/23/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/27/2019 Number of Days to Update: 65 Source: City of Long Beach Fire Department Telephone: 562-570-2563 Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC06917909.2r Page GR-40 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 640 UST TORRANCE: City of Torrance Underground Storage Tank Underground storage tank sites located in the city of Torrance. Date of Government Version: 02/02/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/28/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/13/2021 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: City of Torrance Fire Department Telephone: 310-618-2973 Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually MADERA COUNTY: CUPA MADERA: CUPA Facility List A listing of sites included in the county’s Certified Unified Program Agency database. California’s Secretary for Environmental Protection established the unified hazardous materials and hazardous waste regulatory program as required by chapter 6.11 of the California Health and Safety Code. The Unified Program consolidates the administration, permits, inspections, and enforcement activities. Date of Government Version: 08/10/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/12/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/23/2020 Number of Days to Update: 72 Source: Madera County Environmental Health Telephone: 559-675-7823 Last EDR Contact: 02/11/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/30/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies MARIN COUNTY: UST MARIN: Underground Storage Tank Sites Currently permitted USTs in Marin County. Date of Government Version: 09/26/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/04/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/02/2018 Number of Days to Update: 29 Source: Public Works Department Waste Management Telephone: 415-473-6647 Last EDR Contact: 03/23/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/11/2022 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually MENDOCINO COUNTY: UST MENDOCINO: Mendocino County UST Database A listing of underground storage tank locations in Mendocino County. Date of Government Version: 09/22/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/18/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/22/2021 Number of Days to Update: 4 Source: Department of Public Health Telephone: 707-463-4466 Last EDR Contact: 02/17/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/06/2022 Data Release Frequency: Annually MERCED COUNTY: CUPA MERCED: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility list. Date of Government Version: 11/24/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/29/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/11/2022 Number of Days to Update: 74 Source: Merced County Environmental Health Telephone: 209-381-1094 Last EDR Contact: 02/11/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/30/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies MONO COUNTY: TC06917909.2r Page GR-41 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 641 CUPA MONO: CUPA Facility List CUPA Facility List Date of Government Version: 02/22/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/02/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/19/2021 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: Mono County Health Department Telephone: 760-932-5580 Last EDR Contact: 03/17/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/06/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies MONTEREY COUNTY: CUPA MONTEREY: CUPA Facility Listing CUPA Program listing from the Environmental Health Division. Date of Government Version: 10/04/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/06/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/29/2021 Number of Days to Update: 84 Source: Monterey County Health Department Telephone: 831-796-1297 Last EDR Contact: 03/24/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/11/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies NAPA COUNTY: LUST NAPA: Sites With Reported Contamination A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in Napa county. Date of Government Version: 01/09/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/11/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2017 Number of Days to Update: 50 Source: Napa County Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 707-253-4269 Last EDR Contact: 02/17/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/06/2022 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned UST NAPA: Closed and Operating Underground Storage Tank Sites Underground storage tank sites located in Napa county. Date of Government Version: 09/05/2019 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/09/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/31/2019 Number of Days to Update: 52 Source: Napa County Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 707-253-4269 Last EDR Contact: 02/17/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/06/2022 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned NEVADA COUNTY: CUPA NEVADA: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility list. Date of Government Version: 10/26/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/27/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/20/2022 Number of Days to Update: 85 Source: Community Development Agency Telephone: 530-265-1467 Last EDR Contact: 01/24/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/09/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies ORANGE COUNTY: IND_SITE ORANGE: List of Industrial Site Cleanups Petroleum and non-petroleum spills. TC06917909.2r Page GR-42 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 642 Date of Government Version: 10/08/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/04/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/24/2022 Number of Days to Update: 81 Source: Health Care Agency Telephone: 714-834-3446 Last EDR Contact: 01/31/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/16/2022 Data Release Frequency: Annually LUST ORANGE: List of Underground Storage Tank Cleanups Orange County Underground Storage Tank Cleanups (LUST). Date of Government Version: 10/08/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/02/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/24/2022 Number of Days to Update: 83 Source: Health Care Agency Telephone: 714-834-3446 Last EDR Contact: 01/31/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/16/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly UST ORANGE: List of Underground Storage Tank Facilities Orange County Underground Storage Tank Facilities (UST). Date of Government Version: 10/29/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/29/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/20/2022 Number of Days to Update: 83 Source: Health Care Agency Telephone: 714-834-3446 Last EDR Contact: 10/29/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/16/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PLACER COUNTY: MS PLACER: Master List of Facilities List includes aboveground tanks, underground tanks and cleanup sites. Date of Government Version: 12/01/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/02/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/25/2022 Number of Days to Update: 85 Source: Placer County Health and Human Services Telephone: 530-745-2363 Last EDR Contact: 02/24/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/13/2022 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually PLUMAS COUNTY: CUPA PLUMAS: CUPA Facility List Plumas County CUPA Program facilities. Date of Government Version: 03/31/2019 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/23/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/26/2019 Number of Days to Update: 64 Source: Plumas County Environmental Health Telephone: 530-283-6355 Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies RIVERSIDE COUNTY: LUST RIVERSIDE: Listing of Underground Tank Cleanup Sites Riverside County Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Sites (LUST). Date of Government Version: 09/29/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/30/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/14/2021 Number of Days to Update: 75 Source: Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 951-358-5055 Last EDR Contact: 03/14/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/27/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC06917909.2r Page GR-43 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 643 UST RIVERSIDE: Underground Storage Tank Tank List Underground storage tank sites located in Riverside county. Date of Government Version: 09/29/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/30/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/15/2021 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 951-358-5055 Last EDR Contact: 03/14/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/27/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SACRAMENTO COUNTY: CS SACRAMENTO: Toxic Site Clean-Up List List of sites where unauthorized releases of potentially hazardous materials have occurred. Date of Government Version: 06/18/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/28/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/14/2021 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: Sacramento County Environmental Management Telephone: 916-875-8406 Last EDR Contact: 12/29/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/11/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly ML SACRAMENTO: Master Hazardous Materials Facility List Any business that has hazardous materials on site - hazardous material storage sites, underground storage tanks, waste generators. Date of Government Version: 08/02/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/04/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/02/2021 Number of Days to Update: 90 Source: Sacramento County Environmental Management Telephone: 916-875-8406 Last EDR Contact: 12/29/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/11/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SAN BENITO COUNTY: CUPA SAN BENITO: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 11/04/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/24/2022 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: San Benito County Environmental Health Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 01/28/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/16/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY: PERMITS SAN BERNARDINO: Hazardous Material Permits This listing includes underground storage tanks, medical waste handlers/generators, hazardous materials handlers, hazardous waste generators, and waste oil generators/handlers. Date of Government Version: 12/01/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/02/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/17/2022 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: San Bernardino County Fire Department Hazardous Materials Division Telephone: 909-387-3041 Last EDR Contact: 01/31/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/16/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SAN DIEGO COUNTY: TC06917909.2r Page GR-44 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 644 HMMD SAN DIEGO: Hazardous Materials Management Division Database The database includes: HE58 - This report contains the business name, site address, business phone number, establishment ’H’ permit number, type of permit, and the business status. HE17 - In addition to providing the same information provided in the HE58 listing, HE17 provides inspection dates, violations received by the establishment, hazardous waste generated, the quantity, method of storage, treatment/disposal of waste and the hauler, and information on underground storage tanks. Unauthorized Release List - Includes a summary of environmental contamination cases in San Diego County (underground tank cases, non-tank cases, groundwater contamination, and soil contamination are included.) Date of Government Version: 11/30/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/30/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/16/2022 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: Hazardous Materials Management Division Telephone: 619-338-2268 Last EDR Contact: 02/28/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/13/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly LF SAN DIEGO: Solid Waste Facilities San Diego County Solid Waste Facilities. Date of Government Version: 10/01/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/23/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2021 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: Department of Health Services Telephone: 619-338-2209 Last EDR Contact: 02/25/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies SAN DIEGO CO LOP: Local Oversight Program Listing A listing of all LOP release sites that are or were under the County of San Diego’s jurisdiction. Included are closed or transferred cases, open cases, and cases that did not have a case type indicated. The cases without a case type are mostly complaints; however, some of them could be LOP cases. Date of Government Version: 07/22/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/19/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/13/2022 Number of Days to Update: 86 Source: Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 858-505-6874 Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies SAN DIEGO CO SAM: Environmental Case Listing The listing contains all underground tank release cases and projects pertaining to properties contaminated with hazardous substances that are actively under review by the Site Assessment and Mitigation Program. Date of Government Version: 03/23/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/15/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/09/2010 Number of Days to Update: 24 Source: San Diego County Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 619-338-2371 Last EDR Contact: 02/24/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/13/2022 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY: CUPA SAN FRANCISCO CO: CUPA Facility Listing Cupa facilities Date of Government Version: 02/03/2022 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/04/2022 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/11/2022 Number of Days to Update: 7 Source: San Francisco County Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 415-252-3896 Last EDR Contact: 01/28/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/16/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies LUST SAN FRANCISCO: Local Oversite Facilities A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in San Francisco county. TC06917909.2r Page GR-45 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 645 Date of Government Version: 09/19/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/19/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2008 Number of Days to Update: 10 Source: Department Of Public Health San Francisco County Telephone: 415-252-3920 Last EDR Contact: 01/28/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/16/2022 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned UST SAN FRANCISCO: Underground Storage Tank Information Underground storage tank sites located in San Francisco county. Date of Government Version: 11/10/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/11/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/02/2022 Number of Days to Update: 83 Source: Department of Public Health Telephone: 415-252-3920 Last EDR Contact: 01/28/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/16/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY: UST SAN JOAQUIN: San Joaquin Co. UST A listing of underground storage tank locations in San Joaquin county. Date of Government Version: 06/22/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/26/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/11/2018 Number of Days to Update: 15 Source: Environmental Health Department Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 03/10/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/27/2022 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: CUPA Facility List Cupa Facility List. Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/16/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/03/2022 Number of Days to Update: 79 Source: San Luis Obispo County Public Health Department Telephone: 805-781-5596 Last EDR Contact: 02/11/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/23/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies SAN MATEO COUNTY: BI SAN MATEO: Business Inventory List includes Hazardous Materials Business Plan, hazardous waste generators, and underground storage tanks. Date of Government Version: 02/20/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/20/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/24/2020 Number of Days to Update: 64 Source: San Mateo County Environmental Health Services Division Telephone: 650-363-1921 Last EDR Contact: 03/11/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/20/2022 Data Release Frequency: Annually LUST SAN MATEO: Fuel Leak List A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in San Mateo county. Date of Government Version: 03/29/2019 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/29/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/29/2019 Number of Days to Update: 61 Source: San Mateo County Environmental Health Services Division Telephone: 650-363-1921 Last EDR Contact: 03/02/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/20/2022 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually SANTA BARBARA COUNTY: TC06917909.2r Page GR-46 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 646 CUPA SANTA BARBARA: CUPA Facility Listing CUPA Program Listing from the Environmental Health Services division. Date of Government Version: 09/08/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/09/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/07/2011 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: Santa Barbara County Public Health Department Telephone: 805-686-8167 Last EDR Contact: 02/11/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/30/2022 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SANTA CLARA COUNTY: CUPA SANTA CLARA: Cupa Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 11/19/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/22/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/07/2022 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 408-918-1973 Last EDR Contact: 02/11/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/30/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies HIST LUST SANTA CLARA: HIST LUST - Fuel Leak Site Activity Report A listing of open and closed leaking underground storage tanks. This listing is no longer updated by the county. Leaking underground storage tanks are now handled by the Department of Environmental Health. Date of Government Version: 03/29/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/30/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/21/2005 Number of Days to Update: 22 Source: Santa Clara Valley Water District Telephone: 408-265-2600 Last EDR Contact: 03/23/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/22/2009 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST SANTA CLARA: LOP Listing A listing of leaking underground storage tanks located in Santa Clara county. Date of Government Version: 03/03/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/05/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/18/2014 Number of Days to Update: 13 Source: Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 408-918-3417 Last EDR Contact: 02/17/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/06/2022 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SAN JOSE HAZMAT: Hazardous Material Facilities Hazardous material facilities, including underground storage tank sites. Date of Government Version: 11/03/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/26/2021 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: City of San Jose Fire Department Telephone: 408-535-7694 Last EDR Contact: 02/24/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/16/2022 Data Release Frequency: Annually SANTA CRUZ COUNTY: CUPA SANTA CRUZ: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility listing. Date of Government Version: 01/21/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/22/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/23/2017 Number of Days to Update: 90 Source: Santa Cruz County Environmental Health Telephone: 831-464-2761 Last EDR Contact: 02/11/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/30/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies SHASTA COUNTY: TC06917909.2r Page GR-47 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 647 CUPA SHASTA: CUPA Facility List Cupa Facility List. Date of Government Version: 06/15/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/19/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/09/2017 Number of Days to Update: 51 Source: Shasta County Department of Resource Management Telephone: 530-225-5789 Last EDR Contact: 02/11/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/30/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies SOLANO COUNTY: LUST SOLANO: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in Solano county. Date of Government Version: 06/04/2019 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/06/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/13/2019 Number of Days to Update: 68 Source: Solano County Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 707-784-6770 Last EDR Contact: 02/24/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/13/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly UST SOLANO: Underground Storage Tanks Underground storage tank sites located in Solano county. Date of Government Version: 09/15/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/16/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/09/2021 Number of Days to Update: 84 Source: Solano County Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 707-784-6770 Last EDR Contact: 02/24/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/13/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SONOMA COUNTY: CUPA SONOMA: Cupa Facility List Cupa Facility list Date of Government Version: 07/02/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/06/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2021 Number of Days to Update: 8 Source: County of Sonoma Fire & Emergency Services Department Telephone: 707-565-1174 Last EDR Contact: 03/16/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/04/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies LUST SONOMA: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Sites A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in Sonoma county. Date of Government Version: 06/30/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/30/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/24/2021 Number of Days to Update: 86 Source: Department of Health Services Telephone: 707-565-6565 Last EDR Contact: 03/16/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/04/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly STANISLAUS COUNTY: CUPA STANISLAUS: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 11/09/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/11/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/02/2022 Number of Days to Update: 83 Source: Stanislaus County Department of Ennvironmental Protection Telephone: 209-525-6751 Last EDR Contact: 01/10/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/25/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies SUTTER COUNTY: TC06917909.2r Page GR-48 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 648 UST SUTTER: Underground Storage Tanks Underground storage tank sites located in Sutter county. Date of Government Version: 11/23/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/29/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/11/2022 Number of Days to Update: 74 Source: Sutter County Environmental Health Services Telephone: 530-822-7500 Last EDR Contact: 02/24/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/13/2022 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually TEHAMA COUNTY: CUPA TEHAMA: CUPA Facility List Cupa facilities Date of Government Version: 01/13/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/14/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/06/2021 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: Tehama County Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 530-527-8020 Last EDR Contact: 03/08/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/16/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies TRINITY COUNTY: CUPA TRINITY: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 10/18/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/20/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/13/2022 Number of Days to Update: 85 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 760-352-0381 Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies TULARE COUNTY: CUPA TULARE: CUPA Facility List Cupa program facilities Date of Government Version: 04/26/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/28/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/13/2021 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: Tulare County Environmental Health Services Division Telephone: 559-624-7400 Last EDR Contact: 01/28/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/16/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies TUOLUMNE COUNTY: CUPA TUOLUMNE: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 04/23/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/25/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/25/2018 Number of Days to Update: 61 Source: Divison of Environmental Health Telephone: 209-533-5633 Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies VENTURA COUNTY: TC06917909.2r Page GR-49 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 649 BWT VENTURA: Business Plan, Hazardous Waste Producers, and Operating Underground Tanks The BWT list indicates by site address whether the Environmental Health Division has Business Plan (B), Waste Producer (W), and/or Underground Tank (T) information. Date of Government Version: 09/29/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/13/2022 Number of Days to Update: 79 Source: Ventura County Environmental Health Division Telephone: 805-654-2813 Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly LF VENTURA: Inventory of Illegal Abandoned and Inactive Sites Ventura County Inventory of Closed, Illegal Abandoned, and Inactive Sites. Date of Government Version: 12/01/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/01/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/19/2012 Number of Days to Update: 49 Source: Environmental Health Division Telephone: 805-654-2813 Last EDR Contact: 03/23/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/11/2022 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST VENTURA: Listing of Underground Tank Cleanup Sites Ventura County Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Sites (LUST). Date of Government Version: 05/29/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/24/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/31/2008 Number of Days to Update: 37 Source: Environmental Health Division Telephone: 805-654-2813 Last EDR Contact: 02/07/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/23/2022 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned MED WASTE VENTURA: Medical Waste Program List To protect public health and safety and the environment from potential exposure to disease causing agents, the Environmental Health Division Medical Waste Program regulates the generation, handling, storage, treatment and disposal of medical waste throughout the County. Date of Government Version: 09/29/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/21/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/13/2022 Number of Days to Update: 84 Source: Ventura County Resource Management Agency Telephone: 805-654-2813 Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly UST VENTURA: Underground Tank Closed Sites List Ventura County Operating Underground Storage Tank Sites (UST)/Underground Tank Closed Sites List. Date of Government Version: 11/29/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/07/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/24/2022 Number of Days to Update: 79 Source: Environmental Health Division Telephone: 805-654-2813 Last EDR Contact: 03/08/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/20/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly YOLO COUNTY: UST YOLO: Underground Storage Tank Comprehensive Facility Report Underground storage tank sites located in Yolo county. Date of Government Version: 12/27/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/04/2022 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/18/2022 Number of Days to Update: 73 Source: Yolo County Department of Health Telephone: 530-666-8646 Last EDR Contact: 03/24/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/11/2022 Data Release Frequency: Annually YUBA COUNTY: TC06917909.2r Page GR-50 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 650 CUPA YUBA: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility listing for Yuba County. Date of Government Version: 10/26/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/27/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/20/2022 Number of Days to Update: 85 Source: Yuba County Environmental Health Department Telephone: 530-749-7523 Last EDR Contact: 01/24/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/09/2022 Data Release Frequency: Varies OTHER DATABASE(S) Depending on the geographic area covered by this report, the data provided in these specialty databases may or may not be complete. For example, the existence of wetlands information data in a specific report does not mean that all wetlands in the area covered by the report are included. Moreover, the absence of any reported wetlands information does not necessarily mean that wetlands do not exist in the area covered by the report. CT MANIFEST: Hazardous Waste Manifest Data Facility and manifest data. Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a tsd facility. Date of Government Version: 11/11/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/12/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/01/2022 Number of Days to Update: 81 Source: Department of Energy & Environmental Protection Telephone: 860-424-3375 Last EDR Contact: 02/11/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/23/2022 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned NJ MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/10/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/16/2019 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 01/07/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2022 Data Release Frequency: Annually NY MANIFEST: Facility and Manifest Data Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a TSD facility. Date of Government Version: 01/01/2019 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/29/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/19/2022 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: Department of Environmental Conservation Telephone: 518-402-8651 Last EDR Contact: 01/28/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/09/2022 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PA MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 06/30/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/19/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/10/2019 Number of Days to Update: 53 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 717-783-8990 Last EDR Contact: 01/10/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/25/2022 Data Release Frequency: Annually RI MANIFEST: Manifest information Hazardous waste manifest information Date of Government Version: 12/31/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/30/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2022 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 401-222-2797 Last EDR Contact: 02/14/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/30/2022 Data Release Frequency: Annually TC06917909.2r Page GR-51 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 651 WI MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 05/31/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/19/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/03/2019 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: Department of Natural Resources Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 03/02/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/20/2022 Data Release Frequency: Annually Oil/Gas Pipelines Source: Endeavor Business Media Petroleum Bundle (Crude Oil, Refined Products, Petrochemicals, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty Gases (Miscellaneous)) N = Natural Gas Bundle (Natural Gas, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty Gases (Miscellaneous)). This map includes information copyrighted by Endeavor Business Media. This information is provided on a best effort basis and Endeavor Business Media does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its fitness for any particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of Endeavor Business Media. Electric Power Transmission Line Data Source: Endeavor Business Media This map includes information copyrighted by Endeavor Business Media. This information is provided on a best effort basis and Endeavor Business Media does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its fitness for any particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of Endeavor Business Media. Sensitive Receptors: There are individuals deemed sensitive receptors due to their fragile immune systems and special sensitivity to environmental discharges. These sensitive receptors typically include the elderly, the sick, and children. While the location of all sensitive receptors cannot be determined, EDR indicates those buildings and facilities - schools, daycares, hospitals, medical centers, and nursing homes - where individuals who are sensitive receptors are likely to be located. AHA Hospitals: Source: American Hospital Association, Inc. Telephone: 312-280-5991 The database includes a listing of hospitals based on the American Hospital Association’s annual survey of hospitals. Medical Centers: Provider of Services Listing Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Telephone: 410-786-3000 A listing of hospitals with Medicare provider number, produced by Centers of Medicare & Medicaid Services, a federal agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Nursing Homes Source: National Institutes of Health Telephone: 301-594-6248 Information on Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes in the United States. Public Schools Source: National Center for Education Statistics Telephone: 202-502-7300 The National Center for Education Statistics’ primary database on elementary and secondary public education in the United States. It is a comprehensive, annual, national statistical database of all public elementary and secondary schools and school districts, which contains data that are comparable across all states. Private Schools Source: National Center for Education Statistics Telephone: 202-502-7300 The National Center for Education Statistics’ primary database on private school locations in the United States. Daycare Centers: Licensed Facilities Source: Department of Social Services Telephone: 916-657-4041 Flood Zone Data: This data was obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). It depicts 100-year and 500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. It includes the National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) which incorporates Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) data and Q3 data from FEMA in areas not covered by NFHL. Source: FEMA Telephone: 877-336-2627 Date of Government Version: 2003, 2015 TC06917909.2r Page GR-52 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 652 NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. State Wetlands Data: Wetland Inventory Source: Department of Fish and Wildlife Telephone: 916-445-0411 Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map Source: U.S. Geological Survey STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION Â© 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material. TC06917909.2r Page GR-53 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 653 TC06917909.2r Page A-1 geologic strata. of the soil, and nearby wells. Groundwater flow velocity is generally impacted by the nature of the Groundwater flow direction may be impacted by surface topography, hydrology, hydrogeology, characteristics 2. Groundwater flow velocity. 1. Groundwater flow direction, and Assessment of the impact of contaminant migration generally has two principle investigative components: forming an opinion about the impact of potential contaminant migration. EDR’s GeoCheck Physical Setting Source Addendum is provided to assist the environmental professional in 2018Version Date: 12002866 MYOMA, CANortheast Map: 2018Version Date: 12002826 CATHEDRAL CITY, CATarget Property Map: USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP 307 ft. above sea levelElevation: 3737907.0UTM Y (Meters): 557243.7UTM X (Meters): Zone 11Universal Tranverse Mercator: 116.381727 - 116ˆ 22’ 54.22’’Longitude (West): 33.781496 - 33ˆ 46’ 53.39’’Latitude (North): TARGET PROPERTY COORDINATES PALM DESERT, CA 92211 SHADOW RIDGE ROAD C3-8984 TARGET PROPERTY ADDRESS ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE ADDENDUM® 654 TC06917909.2r Page A-2 should be field verified. on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity Source: Topography has been determined from the USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated SURROUNDING TOPOGRAPHY: ELEVATION PROFILES Elevation (ft)Elevation (ft)TP TP 0 1/2 1 Miles✩Target Property Elevation: 307 ft. North South West East272278281287291294298301304307311314314310304281266245223307307307304301304307310311307309307307297290279267254236General SSEGeneral Topographic Gradient: TARGET PROPERTY TOPOGRAPHY should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, Surface topography may be indicative of the direction of surficial groundwater flow. This information can be used to TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION collected on nearby properties, and regional groundwater flow information (from deep aquifers). sources of information, such as surface topographic information, hydrologic information, hydrogeologic data using site-specific well data. If such data is not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary to rely on other Groundwater flow direction for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION INFORMATION ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® 655 TC06917909.2r Page A-3 Not Reported GENERAL DIRECTIONLOCATION GROUNDWATER FLOWFROM TPMAP ID hydrogeologically, and the depth to water table. authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, groundwater flow direction as determined flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted by environmental professionals to regulatory EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System to provide data on the general direction of groundwater AQUIFLOW® Search Radius: 1.000 Mile. Not found Status: 1.25 miles Search Radius: Site-Specific Hydrogeological Data*: * ©1996 Site-specific hydrogeological data gathered by CERCLIS Alerts, Inc., Bainbridge Island, WA. All rights reserved. All of the information and opinions presented are those of the cited EPA report(s), which were completed under a Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) investigation. contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should of groundwater flow direction in the immediate area. Such hydrogeologic information can be used to assist the Hydrogeologic information obtained by installation of wells on a specific site can often be an indicator HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION YES - refer to the Overview Map and Detail MapCATHEDRAL CITY NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY NWI Electronic Data CoverageNWI Quad at Target Property FEMA FIRM Flood data06065C1615G Additional Panels in search area:FEMA Source Type FEMA FIRM Flood data06065C1595G Flood Plain Panel at Target Property FEMA Source Type FEMA FLOOD ZONE and bodies of water). Refer to the Physical Setting Source Map following this summary for hydrologic information (major waterways contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should Surface water can act as a hydrologic barrier to groundwater flow. Such hydrologic information can be used to assist HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® 656 TC06917909.2r Page A-4 Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994). of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - a digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology ROCK STRATIGRAPHIC UNIT GEOLOGIC AGE IDENTIFICATION Stratifed SequenceCategory:CenozoicEra: QuaternarySystem: QuaternarySeries: QCode: (decoded above as Era, System & Series) at which contaminant migration may be occurring. Geologic information can be used by the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the relative speed GEOLOGIC INFORMATION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY move more quickly through sandy-gravelly types of soils than silty-clayey types of soils. characteristics data collected on nearby properties and regional soil information. In general, contaminant plumes to rely on other sources of information, including geologic age identification, rock stratigraphic unit and soil using site specific geologic and soil strata data. If such data are not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary Groundwater flow velocity information for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional GROUNDWATER FLOW VELOCITY INFORMATION ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® 657 EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc. 2 1 0 1/16 1/8 1/4 Miles 658 TC06917909.2r Page A-6 Somewhat excessively drainedSoil Drainage Class: excessively drained sands and gravels. Class A - High infiltration rates. Soils are deep, well drained toHydrologic Group: fine sandSoil Surface Texture: MyomaSoil Component Name: Soil Map ID: 2 7.9 Max: 9 Min: Min: 42 Max: 141 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED and Sand. Clayey Gravel 200), Silty, or passing No. pct. or less materials (35 Granularsand59 inches18 inches 2 7.9 Max: 9 Min: Min: 42 Max: 141 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED and Sand. Clayey Gravel 200), Silty, or passing No. pct. or less materials (35 Granularfine sand18 inches 0 inches 1 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) > 0 inchesDepth to Watertable Min: > 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min: HighCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Hydric Status: Partially hydric Somewhat excessively drainedSoil Drainage Class: excessively drained sands and gravels. Class A - High infiltration rates. Soils are deep, well drained toHydrologic Group: fine sandSoil Surface Texture: MyomaSoil Component Name: Soil Map ID: 1 in a landscape. The following information is based on Soil Conservation Service SSURGO data. for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Soil Conservation Service (SCS) leads the National Cooperative Soil DOMINANT SOIL COMPOSITION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® 659 TC06917909.2r Page A-7 No Wells Found FEDERAL USGS WELL INFORMATION LOCATION FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID 1.000State Database Nearest PWS within 1 mileFederal FRDS PWS 1.000Federal USGS WELL SEARCH DISTANCE INFORMATION SEARCH DISTANCE (miles)DATABASE opinion about the impact of contaminant migration on nearby drinking water wells. professional in assessing sources that may impact ground water flow direction, and in forming an EDR Local/Regional Water Agency records provide water well information to assist the environmental LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS 7.9 Max: 9 Min: Min: 42 Max: 141 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED and Sand. Clayey Gravel 200), Silty, or passing No. pct. or less materials (35 Granularsand59 inches18 inches 2 7.9 Max: 9 Min: Min: 42 Max: 141 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED and Sand. Clayey Gravel 200), Silty, or passing No. pct. or less materials (35 Granularfine sand18 inches 0 inches 1 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) > 0 inchesDepth to Watertable Min: > 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min: HighCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Hydric Status: Partially hydric ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® 660 TC06917909.2r Page A-8 1/2 - 1 Mile SECADDW0000009475 5 1/2 - 1 Mile SSWCADDW0000010423 4 1/2 - 1 Mile SSWCADDW0000009925 3 1/4 - 1/2 Mile NNWCADDW0000012586 2 1/4 - 1/2 Mile NNECADDW0000011521 1 STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION LOCATION FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID Note: PWS System location is not always the same as well location. No PWS System Found FEDERAL FRDS PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM INFORMATION LOCATION FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® 661 EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.200240240 3202 802 8 0 2 4020 320 3 2 0 2 8 0 280 2 80240 240 28 0280280 24 0 24 0 20 0 2 00CA 662 TC06917909.2r Page A-10 Not ReportedGeoTracker Data: date=&global_id=&assigned_name=3310001-217&store_num= https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=DHS&samp_Groundwater Quality Data: Not ReportedGAMA PFAS Testing: WELL 4612-1Other Name: Department of Health ServicesSource: MUNICIPALWell Type: 3310001-217Well ID: 4 SSW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower CADDW0000010423CA WELLS Not ReportedGeoTracker Data: date=&global_id=&assigned_name=3310001-178&store_num= https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=DHS&samp_Groundwater Quality Data: Not ReportedGAMA PFAS Testing: WELL 4611-1Other Name: Department of Health ServicesSource: MUNICIPALWell Type: 3310001-178Well ID: 3 SSW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower CADDW0000009925CA WELLS Not ReportedGeoTracker Data: date=&global_id=&assigned_name=3310001-210&store_num= https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=DHS&samp_Groundwater Quality Data: Not ReportedGAMA PFAS Testing: WELL 4613-1Other Name: Department of Health ServicesSource: MUNICIPALWell Type: 3310001-210Well ID: 2 NNW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher CADDW0000012586CA WELLS Not ReportedGeoTracker Data: date=&global_id=&assigned_name=3310001-216&store_num= https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=DHS&samp_Groundwater Quality Data: Not ReportedGAMA PFAS Testing: WELL 4614-2Other Name: Department of Health ServicesSource: MUNICIPALWell Type: 3310001-216Well ID: 1 NNE 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Lower CADDW0000011521CA WELLS Map ID Direction Distance Elevation EDR ID NumberDatabase ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® 663 TC06917909.2r Page A-11 Not ReportedGeoTracker Data: date=&global_id=&assigned_name=3310001-200&store_num= https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=DHS&samp_Groundwater Quality Data: Not ReportedGAMA PFAS Testing: WELL 5676-2Other Name: Department of Health ServicesSource: MUNICIPALWell Type: 3310001-200Well ID: 5 SE 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower CADDW0000009475CA WELLS Map ID Direction Distance Elevation EDR ID NumberDatabase ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® 664 TC06917909.2r Page A-12 0%0%100%1.700 pCi/LBasement 0%0%100%0.450 pCi/LLiving Area - 2nd Floor 0%0%100%0.117 pCi/LLiving Area - 1st Floor % >20 pCi/L% 4-20 pCi/L% <4 pCi/LAverage ActivityArea Number of sites tested: 12 Federal Area Radon Information for RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CA : Zone 3 indoor average level < 2 pCi/L. : Zone 2 indoor average level >= 2 pCi/L and <= 4 pCi/L. Note: Zone 1 indoor average level > 4 pCi/L. Federal EPA Radon Zone for RIVERSIDE County: 2 01092211 ______________________ > 4 pCi/LNum TestsZipcode Radon Test Results State Database: CA Radon AREA RADON INFORMATION GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS RADON ® 665 TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model (DEM) Source: United States Geologic Survey EDR acquired the USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model in 2002 and updated it in 2006. The 7.5 minute DEM corresponds to the USGS 1:24,000- and 1:25,000-scale topographic quadrangle maps. The DEM provides elevation data with consistent elevation units and projection. Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map Source: U.S. Geological Survey HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION Flood Zone Data: This data was obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). It depicts 100-year and 500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. It includes the National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) which incorporates Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) data and Q3 data from FEMA in areas not covered by NFHL. Source: FEMA Telephone: 877-336-2627 Date of Government Version: 2003, 2015 NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. State Wetlands Data: Wetland Inventory Source: Department of Fish and Wildlife Telephone: 916-445-0411 HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION AQUIFLOW Information SystemR Source: EDR proprietary database of groundwater flow information EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System (AIS) to provide data on the general direction of groundwater flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted to regulatory authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, hydrogeologically determined groundwater flow direction and depth to water table information. GEOLOGIC INFORMATION Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - A digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994). STATSGO: State Soil Geographic Database Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) leads the national Conservation Soil Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns in a landscape. Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed (SSURGO) soil survey maps. SSURGO: Soil Survey Geographic Database Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Telephone: 800-672-5559 SSURGO is the most detailed level of mapping done by the Natural Resources Conservation Service, mapping scales generally range from 1:12,000 to 1:63,360. Field mapping methods using national standards are used to construct the soil maps in the Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database. SSURGO digitizing duplicates the original soil survey maps. This level of mapping is designed for use by landowners, townships and county natural resource planning and management. TC06917909.2r Page PSGR-1 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED 666 LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS FEDERAL WATER WELLS PWS: Public Water Systems Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water Telephone: 202-564-3750 Public Water System data from the Federal Reporting Data System. A PWS is any water system which provides water to at least 25 people for at least 60 days annually. PWSs provide water from wells, rivers and other sources. PWS ENF: Public Water Systems Violation and Enforcement Data Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water Telephone: 202-564-3750 Violation and Enforcement data for Public Water Systems from the Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) after August 1995. Prior to August 1995, the data came from the Federal Reporting Data System (FRDS). USGS Water Wells: USGS National Water Inventory System (NWIS) This database contains descriptive information on sites where the USGS collects or has collected data on surface water and/or groundwater. The groundwater data includes information on wells, springs, and other sources of groundwater. OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION Groundwater Ambient Monitoring & Assessment Program State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-341-5577 The GAMA Program is Californias comprehensive groundwater quality monitoring program. GAMA collects data by testing the untreated, raw water in different types of wells for naturally-occurring and man-made chemicals. The GAMA data includes Domestic, Monitoring and Municipal well types from the following sources, Department of Water Resources, Department of Heath Services, EDF, Agricultural Lands, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Department of Pesticide Regulation, United States Geological Survey, Groundwater Ambient Monitoring and Assessment Program and Local Groundwater Projects. Water Well Database Source: Department of Water Resources Telephone: 916-651-9648 California Drinking Water Quality Database Source: Department of Public Health Telephone: 916-324-2319 The database includes all drinking water compliance and special studies monitoring for the state of California since 1984. It consists of over 3,200,000 individual analyses along with well and water system information. California Oil and Gas Well Locations Source: Dept of Conservation, Geologic Energy Management Division Telephone: 916-323-1779 Oil and Gas well locations in the state. California Earthquake Fault Lines Source: California Division of Mines and Geology The fault lines displayed on EDR’s Topographic map are digitized quaternary fault lines prepared in 1975 by the United State Geological Survey. Additional information (also from 1975) regarding activity at specific fault lines comes from California’s Preliminary Fault Activity Map prepared by the California Division of Mines and Geology. RADON State Database: CA Radon Source: Department of Public Health Telephone: 916-210-8558 Radon Database for California TC06917909.2r Page PSGR-2 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED 667 Area Radon Information Source: USGS Telephone: 703-356-4020 The National Radon Database has been developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and is a compilation of the EPA/State Residential Radon Survey and the National Residential Radon Survey. The study covers the years 1986 - 1992. Where necessary data has been supplemented by information collected at private sources such as universities and research institutions. EPA Radon Zones Source: EPA Telephone: 703-356-4020 Sections 307 & 309 of IRAA directed EPA to list and identify areas of U.S. with the potential for elevated indoor radon levels. OTHER Airport Landing Facilities: Private and public use landing facilities Source: Federal Aviation Administration, 800-457-6656 Epicenters: World earthquake epicenters, Richter 5 or greater Source: Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration California Earthquake Fault Lines: The fault lines displayed on EDR’s Topographic map are digitized quaternary fault lines, prepared in 1975 by the United State Geological Survey. Additional information (also from 1975) regarding activity at specific fault lines comes from California’s Preliminary Fault Activity Map prepared by the California Division of Mines and Geology. STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION Â© 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material. TC06917909.2r Page PSGR-3 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED 668 Hillmann Consulting LLC Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Hillmann Project No.: C3-8984 Shadow Ridge Road, Palm Desert, California APPENDIX F OTHER DOCUMENTS 669 Your water is our promise. | CVWD.org Water Quality Report provides details about CVWD’s drinking water. Pages 4 – 7 CVWD partners with Desert Arc on new recycling program. Page 9 CVWD continues commitment to disadvantaged communities completing three projects. Page 10 ANNUAL REVIEW2020 – 21 670 10 10 111 111 S22 86 86S 62 74 GENERAL DISTRICT BOUNDARY DIRECTORIAL BOUNDARIES HIGHWAYS COACHELLA CANAL STORMWATER CHANNEL REPLENISHMENT FACILITIES MAP NOT TO SCALE CREATED 2014 LAKE CAHUILLALAKE CAHUILLA COACHELLA CANAL123 MILESCOACHELLA CANAL123 MILES LA QUINTALA QUINTA COACHELLACOACHELLA PALMSPRINGSPALMSPRINGS PALMDESERTPALMDESERT RANCHOMIRAGERANCHOMIRAGE CATHEDRALCITYCATHEDRALCITY DESERTHOTSPRINGS DESERTHOTSPRINGS INDIAN WELLS INDIAN WELLS SALTON SEA INDIOINDIO DIVISION 2DIVISION 2 DIVISION 1DIVISION 1 DIVISION 3DIVISION 3 DIVISION 5DIVISION 5 DIVISION 4DIVISION 4 BOARD OF DIRECTORS John Powell Jr. Board President | Division Three Cástulo R. Estrada Board Vice President | Division Five John Aguilar | Division One Anthony Bianco | Division Two Peter Nelson | Division Four SENIOR ADMINISTRATIONJim Barrett General Manager Robert Cheng Assistant General Manager Dan Charlton Assistant General Manager Sylvia Bermudez Clerk of the Board DEPARTMENT HEADSSteve Bigley Director of Environmental Services Scott Burritt Director of Service Katie Evans Director of Communications and Conservation Scott Hunter Director of Human Resources Geoffrey Kiehl Director of Finance Luis Maciel Director of Information Systems Carrie Oliphant Director of Engineering MAIN SWITCHBOARD (760) 398-2651 CUSTOMER SERVICE(760) 391-9600 PAYMENT ADDRESS P.O. Box 5000 Coachella, CA 92236 CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS P.O. Box 1058 Coachella, CA 92236 OFFICES 75-515 & 75-525 Hovley Lane East | Palm Desert 51-501 Tyler St. | Coachella ESTABLISHED IN 1918, the Coachella Valley Water District is a government agency run by a five-member Board of Directors, elected to represent the five divisions within CVWD’s service area. The directors serve four-year terms. BOARD MEETINGS are open to the public and generally held on the second and fourth Tuesday of each month at 8 a.m. at district offices. The first meeting of the month is typically held in Palm Desert and the second is held in Coachella. To confirm meeting details, call the District or view the meeting agenda on the website at www.cvwd.org . THE WATER QUALITY REPORT on pages 4 – 7 is mailed to all bill payers who request it (payers within the District’s domestic water boundary who request it in accordance with state law). The Annual Review is produced by CVWD’s Outreach & Education staff. Cover photo courtesy of Ferguson Pape Baldwin Architects. 671 CVWD | 1 This past year has presented all of us with many challenges as we’ve navigated through the COVID-19 pandemic. For many, this year included some type of loss. Our hearts go out to everyone who has been impacted. Throughout this challenging year, as always, CVWD remains committed to ensuring the reliability and high quality of all our water services. You can depend upon that promise. Part of that commitment, and our dedication to transparency, is displayed in this year’s Annual Review and Water Quality Report. The Domestic Water Quality Summary on pages 4 – 7 provides important information about the high quality of your drinking water. The rest of this publication provides an overview of some of the past year’s accomplishments and a look ahead at CVWD’s constant effort to innovate and prepare for the future: • CVWD continues to encourage conservation of our most precious resource. Conservation programs are outlined on page 8. A new partnership with the nonprofit group Desert Arc to recycle irrigation controllers is described on page 9. • We continue to seek funding to help disadvantaged communities in the east valley that currently do not have clean drinking water and reliable water treatment systems. Through the Disadvantaged Communities Infrastructure Task Force, we identify the communities most in need and seek federal and state funds to add these communities to our system. That ongoing effort is described on page 10. • Studies continue to show that CVWD’s replenishment programs are successful and help protect our precious aquifer. You can read more about replenishment on page 3. • CVWD offers nonpotable water options to customers for irrigation purposes. This important water supply is explained on page 12. As always, our commitment remains steadfast: Your water is our promise. Sincerely, Jim Barrett A MESSAGE FROM CVWD'S MISSION STATEMENT To meet the water-related needs of the people through dedicated employees, providing high-quality water at a reasonable cost. General Manager 672 2 CVWD’s new Critical Support Services (CSS) building was one of three projects nationwide receiving the National Award of Merit in the water/wastewater category from the Design-Build Institute of America (DBIA). The institute states that the award “showcases not only an extraordinary project, but also how the project team went well above and beyond achieving cost, schedule and quality goals, demonstrating unique applications of design-build best practices.” In addition to CVWD, the award recognized the work of design-build firm, Swinerton, architect Ferguson Pape Baldwin Architects, Engineer SWS Engineering Inc., and specialty contractors McParlane & Associates. The CSS Building, the newest building on the CVWD Palm Desert campus, houses four operation centers to ensure CVWD will always be able to provide reliable water service to customers. CVWD also was recognized this year for its Operating and Capital Improvement Budget for fiscal year 2021. It received a Distinguished Budget Presentation Award from the Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada (GFOA). CVWD has received GFOA awards for the past nine years beginning fiscal year ending June 30, 2012. To receive the award, CVWD satisfied nationally recognized guidelines for effective budget presentation. These guidelines are designed to assess how an entity’s budget serves as a policy document, a financial plan, an operations guide, and a communications device. Budget documents must be rated “proficient” in all four categories, and in the 14 mandatory criteria within those categories, to receive the award. SOME OTHER KEY ACCOMPLISHMENTS: • COVID-19 Response: The District has maintained service throughout the COVID-19 emergency, the Board of Directors suspended late penalties on customers' bills and CVWD continues to assist customers with economic hardship through the Help2Others program. • Land Subsidence Slows: A new USGS report shows efforts by CVWD to replenish local aquifers have led to stable land surface elevations in most of the region. • Reliable drinking water: Westside Elementary School in Thermal was connected to the CVWD system. The school had relied on an unreliable onsite well and had no fire protection. • Less groundwater use: A pump station replacement lessens reliance on groundwater and provides an alternative to large irrigation users throughout the City of La Quinta. • Employee health: The American Heart Association presented CVWD with a Gold level recognition for the employee wellness program and employee health. CVWD Draws Praise for New Critical Support Services Building, Budget Report Critical Support Services Building Control Room Environmental Services Laboratory Photos courtesy of Ferguson Pape Baldwin Architects. CVWD's Operating and Capital Improvement Budget for Fiscal Year 2020 – 21 673 CVWD | 3 Federal Report Shows Increasing Groundwater Levels in the Coachella Valley Coachella Valley Groundwater Basin Profile: The graphic above represents the Coachella Valley Groundwater Basin, a.k.a. “The Aquifer." A report by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) shows that efforts by CVWD to replenish local aquifers in the Coachella Valley have been effective, leading to stable land surface elevations in most of the Coachella Valley. Areas with land subsidence identified in prior studies are now stable, uplifting, or experiencing substantial slowing of subsidence. CVWD partners with Coachella Water Authority, Desert Water Agency, Indio Water Authority, and Mission Springs Water District to manage groundwater in the Coachella Valley. The study shows that CVWD’s commitment to these partnerships and the sustainability of the aquifer that supplies most of our drinking water is a success story, said Jim Barrett, General Manager of CVWD. “The results clearly demonstrate a reversal in trends of groundwater-level declines during previous decades. This is good news for the long-term health of the aquifers.” The USGS report identified three initiatives by CVWD that have been most effective in improving groundwater conditions in some of the historically most overdrafted areas of the valley. Since 2009, the initiatives are providing Colorado River water through the Mid-Valley Pipeline project to reduce groundwater pumping; budget-based, tiered water rates in place that have contributed to conservation; and aquifer replenishment at the Thomas E. Levy Groundwater Replenishment Facility. CVWD began importing water to the Coachella Valley in 1949 to help reduce groundwater pumping. To collect data for the study, Global Positioning System (GPS) surveying and interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) methods were used to analyze the vertical land- surface changes in the Coachella Valley. The study found that water levels in wells throughout the valley showed longer- term stability or rising groundwater levels since about 2010. These results mark a reversal in trends of groundwater-level declines during the preceding decades. CVWD and the USGS have been investigating subsidence since 1996 in response to concerns that pumping of groundwater was leading to groundwater-level declines that also could trigger land subsidence. In addition to supplying drinking water, groundwater has been a major source of water for agricultural, recreational and municipal use in the Coachella Valley since the early 1920s. The full report, Detection and Measurement of Land Subsidence and Uplift Using Global Positioning System Surveys and Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar, Coachella Valley, California, 2010–17, can be viewed at pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/sir20205093. Palm Desert Groundwater Replenishment Facility F a u l t Snow Colorado River Water Replenishment pond Privatewell Communitywell Rain SnowRain + Snowmelt Aquifer Unsaturated Zone RecycledWater Bedrock Aqueduct/Canal Subsurface Inflows 674 CVWD | 54 | CVWD This annual report communicates the results of CVWD’s water quality monitoring. The State Water Resources Control Board Division of Drinking Water (DDW) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) require routine and comprehensive monitoring of CVWD’s drinking water supply. CVWD’S COMMITMENT Coachella Valley Water District is committed to delivering high quality drinking water. Water is delivered to customers from wells drilled into the Coachella Valley’s groundwater basin. Highly trained employees routinely monitor CVWD’s public water systems and collect drinking water samples that are tested at CVWD’s state-certified laboratory. A few specialized tests are performed by other certified laboratories. In addition to the detected constituents listed in the table on pages 6 – 7, CVWD’s Water Quality staff monitors for more than100 other regulated and unregulated chemicals that are not detected during this monitoring. CVWD is governed by a locally elected, five-member board of directors that generally meets in public session at8 am, on the second and fourth Tuesdays of each month. Meeting locations rotate between CVWD’s Coachella office at 51-501 Tyler St.and the Steve Robbins Administration Building at 75-515 Hovley Lane Eastin Palm Desert. Call CVWD to confirm meeting time, date and location. SENSITIVE POPULATIONS Some people may be more vulnerable to contaminants in drinking water than the general population. Immuno-compromisedpersons such as persons with cancer undergoing chemotherapy, persons who have undergone organ transplants, people with HIV/AIDS or other immune system disorders, some elderly, and infants can be particularly at risk from infections. These people should seek advice about drinking water from their health care providers. USEPA/Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines on appropriatemeans to lessen the risk of infection by Cryptosporidium (a microbial pathogen found in surface water throughout the United States) and other microbial contaminants are available from the Safe Drinking Water Information Hotline 1-800-426-4791 or epa.gov/ground-water-and-drinking-water. Call Safe Drinking Water Information Hotline to obtain updated link if needed. NATURALLY OCCURRING ELEMENTS Arsenic While all of CVWD’s domestic water supply meets state and federal standards for arsenic, drinking water supplied to some service areas does contain low levels of naturally occurring arsenic. The arsenic standard balances the current understanding of arsenic’s possible health effects against the costs of removing arsenic from drinking water. USEPA continues to research the health effects of low levels of arsenic, which is a mineral known to cause cancer in humans at high concentrations and is linked to other health effects such as skin damage and circulatory problems. All drinking water delivered by CVWD last year complied with the 10 microgram per liter (ug/L) maximum contaminant level (MCL). Radon Radon is a naturally occurring, radioactive gas — a byproduct of uranium — that originates underground but is found in the air. Radon moves from the ground into homes primarily through cracks and holes in their foundations. While most radon enters the home through soil, radon from tap water typically is less than two percent of the radon in indoor air. The USEPA has determined that breathing radon gas increases an individual’s chances of developing lung cancer, and has proposed an MCL of 300 picoCuries per liter (pCi/L) for radon in drinking water. This proposed standard is far less than the 4,000 pCi/L in water that is equivalent to the radon level found in outdoor air. The radon level in CVWD wells ranges from none detected to 460 pCi/L, significantly lower than that found in the air you breathe. POTENTIAL CONTAMINANTS About Nitrate Nitrate (as nitrogen) in drinking water at levels above 10 milligrams per liter (mg/L) is a health risk for infants younger than six months. High nitrate levels in drinking water can interfere with the capacity of the infant’s blood to carry oxygen, resulting in serious illness; symptoms include shortness of breath and blueness of skin. Nitrate (as nitrogen) in drinking water levels above 10 milligrams per liter (mg/L) may also affect the ability of blood to carry oxygen in other individuals, such as pregnant women and those with certain enzyme deficiencies. If you are caring for an infant or you are pregnant, you should ask for advice from your health care provider. Wells that confirm with nitrate levels (as nitrogen) above 10 mg/L are removed from service. ABOUT LEAD If present, elevated levels of lead can cause serious health problems, especially for pregnant women and young children. Lead in drinking water is primarily from materials and components associated with service lines and home plumbing. Responsibility CVWD is responsible for providing high quality drinking water, but cannot control the variety of materials used in customer plumbing components. Tip When your water has been sitting for several hours, you can minimize the potential for lead exposure by flushing your tap for 30 seconds before using water for drinking or cooking. You can capture this flushed water in a container and use it for watering plants. Resource Information If you are concerned about lead in your water, you may wish to have your water tested. Information on lead in drinking water, testing methods, and steps you can take to minimize exposure is available from the Safe Drinking Water Information Hotline (1-800-426-4791) or at epa.gov/lead. As noted, all drinking water served by CVWD comes from groundwater wells. DDW requires water agencies to state: “the sources of drinking water (both tap water and bottled water) include rivers, lakes, streams, ponds, reservoirs, springs and wells.As water travels over the surface of the land or through the ground, it dissolves naturally occurring minerals and, in some cases, radioactive material, and can pick up substances resulting from the presence of animals or from human activity.” CONTAMINANTS THAT MAY BE PRESENT IN SOURCE WATER INCLUDE: Microbial contaminants, such as viruses and bacteria, that may come from sewage treatment plants, septic systems, agricultural livestock operations and wildlife. Inorganic contaminants, such as salts and metals, that can be naturally occurring or result from urban stormwater runoff, industrial or domestic wastewater discharges, oil and gas production, mining or farming. Pesticides and herbicides that may come from a variety of sources such as agriculture, urban stormwater runoff and residential uses. Organic chemical contaminants, including synthetic and volatile organic chemicals, that are byproducts of industrial processes and petroleum production, and can also come from gas stations, urban stormwater runoff and septic systems. Radioactive contaminants that can be naturally occurring or be the result of oil and gas production and mining activities. In order to ensure that tap water is safe to drink, USEPA and DDW prescribe regulations that limit the amount of certain contaminants in water provided by public water systems. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration regulations and California law also establish limits for contaminants in bottled water that must provide the same protection for public health. “Drinking water, including bottledwater, may reasonably be expectedto contain at least small amounts of some contaminants. The presence of contaminants does not necessarily indicate that water poses a health risk. More information about contaminants and potential health effects can be obtained by calling the USEPA’s Safe Drinking Water Information Hotline (1-800-426-4791) or the National Radon Hotline (1-800-767-7236).” Additionally, the USEPA’s health advisories tables are available atepa.gov/dwstandardsregulations/2018-drinking-water-standards-and-advisory-tables. DRINKING WATER SOURCEWATER ASSESSMENTS: CVWD has conducted source water assessments that provide information about the vulnerability of CVWD wells to contamination. In 2002, CVWD completed a comprehensive source water assessment that evaluated all groundwater wells supplying the CVWD’s six public water systems. An assessment is performed on each new well added to CVWD’s system. Groundwater from these CVWD wellsis considered vulnerable to activities associated with urban and agricultural uses. Urban land uses include the following activities: known contaminant plumes, dry cleaners, underground storage tanks, septic systems, automobile gas stations (including historic), automobile repair shops, historic waste dumps/landfills, illegal/unauthorized dumping, sewer collection systems and utility stations’ maintenance areas. Agricultural land uses include the following activities: irrigation/agricultural wells, irrigated crops, pesticide/fertilizer/petroleum and transfer areas. The following activities have been associated with detected contaminants: known contaminant plumes, dry cleaners and irrigated crops. CVWD is committed to supplying high quality drinking water from CVWD’s wells to our communities. DEFINITIONS & ABBREVIATIONS AL or Regulatory Action Level The concentration of a contaminant which, if exceeded, triggers treatment or other requirements which a water system must follow. MCL or Maximum Contaminant Level The highest level of a contaminant that is allowed in drinking water. Primary MCLs are set as close to public health goals or maximum contaminant level goals as economically and technologically feasible. Secondary MCLs are set to protect the odor, taste and appearance of drinking water. MCLG or Maximum Contaminant Level Goal Level of a contaminant in drinking water below which there is no known or expected risk to health. MCLGs are set by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. mg/L — Milligrams per liter (parts per million or ppm) One mg/L is equivalent to 1 second in 11.5 days. MRDL or Maximum Residual Disinfectant Level The highest level of a disinfectant allowed in drinking water. There is convincing evidence that addition of a disinfectant is necessary for control of microbial contaminants. MRDLG or Maximum Residual Disinfectant Level Goal The level of a drinking water disinfectant below which there is no known or expected risk to health. MRDLGs do not reflect the benefits of the use of disinfectants to control microbial contaminants. N/A — Not applicable The government has not set a Public Health Goal, Maximum Contaminant Level Goal or Maximum Contaminant Level for this substance. ND — None detected ng/L — Nanograms per liter (parts per trillion or ppt) One ng/L is equivalent to 1 second in 32,000 years. NL or Notification Level Health based advisory level established by the DDW for chemicals in drinking water that lack maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) as stated by DDW. NTU — Nephelometric turbidity units Measurement of suspended material pCi/L — picoCuries per liter For uranium, one pCi/L is equivalent to 1 second in 21 years. PDWS or Primary Drinking Water Standard MCLs and MRDLs for contaminants that affect health along with their monitoring and reporting requirements, and water treatment requirement. PHG or Public Health Goal Level of a contaminant in drinking water below which there is no known or expected risk to health. Public Health Goals are set by the California Environmental Protection Agency. ug/L—Micrograms per liter (parts per billion or ppm) One ug/L is equivalent to 1 second in 32 years. uS/cm — Microsiemens per centimeter 5675 CVWD | 76 WHAT’S IN MY WATER? CVWD analyzed more than 18,000 water samples last year to monitor the water quality of drinking water delivered to its customers. Every year, CVWD is required to analyze a select number of these samples for more than 100 regulated and unregulated substances. This table lists those substances that were detected in CVWD’s three service areas. Brown boxes indicate the substance was not detected (ND), existing data is no longer reportable or there is no available data. The data on the chart summarizes results of the most recent monitoring completed between 2011 and 2020. CVWD did not have any Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) violations in 2020. TO READ THIS TABLE: First, determine your service area by referring to footnotes 2, 3 and 4 on the opposite page. Then move down the corresponding column, comparing the detection level of each chemical or other contaminant with the Public Health Goal (PHG), Maximum Contaminant LevelGoal (MCLG) and MCL. For example, if you live in La Quinta and want to know the level of fluoride detected in your service area, you would look down the Cove Communities column and stop at the fluoride row. The average fluoride level in that service area is 0.5 mg/L with the range of results varying between not detected and 1.0 mg/L. Compare these values to the MCL in the third column. Fluoride levels in this water comply with the MCL of 2.0 mg/L. The range can show a level above the MCL and still comply with the drinking water standard when compliance is based on average levels found in each water source or water system. FOOTNOTES: (1) Values with this footnote have fixed Secondary MCLs, remaining values are Primary MCLs unless identified otherwise. (2) Cove Communities includes the communities of Rancho Mirage, Thousand Palms, Palm Desert, Indian Wells, La Quinta, Mecca, Bombay Beach, North Shore, Hot Mineral Spa; and portions of Bermuda Dunes, Cathedral City, Indio, Oasis, Riverside County, Thermal, and Valerie Jean. (3) ID No. 8 includes the communities of Indio Hills, Sky Valley; and select areas within and adjacent to Desert Hot Springs. (4) ID No. 11 includes the communities of Desert Shores, Salton Sea Beach and Salton City. (5) This constituent is monitored for aesthetics such as taste and odor. A fixed consumer acceptance contaminant level has not been established for this constituent. (6) The reported average represents the highest running annual average based on distribution monitoring. (7) Results from 2020 unregulated contaminant monitoring rule (UCMR4) testing for five Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) are included in Cove Community data. CVWD performed this monitoring at select CVWD domestic facilities in Cove Communities. (8) California’s Chromium-6 drinking water MCL became effective on July 1, 2014. The Cr6 MCL was invalidated and withdrawn in 2017. (9) The reported values are 90th percentile levels for samples collected from faucets in water user homes. (10) The reported average represents the highest locational running annual average (LRAA) based on distribution system monitoring. (11) Systems that collect 40 or more samples per month (Cove Communities): 5.0% of monthly samples are positive. Systems that collect less than 40 samples per month (ID No. 8 and ID No. 11): 1 positive monthly sample. (12) All water systems are required to comply with the California Total Coliform Rule and the Federal Revised Total Coliform Rule. The USEPA anticipates greater public health protection as the new rule requires water systems that are vulnerable to microbial contamination to identify and fix problems. (13) In 2020, USEPA required unregulated contaminant monitoring (identified as UCMR4) for select CVWD domestic facilities in Cove Communities. (14) Unregulated contaminants are those for which USEPA and DDW have not established drinking water standards. The purpose of unregulated contaminant monitoring is to assist both regulatory agencies in determining the occurrence of unregulated contaminants in drinking water and whether further regulation is warranted. (15) Results from 2020 unregulated contaminant monitoring rule (UCMR4) testing for six Haloacetic Acids (HAABr6). CVWD performed this monitoring at select CVWD domestic facilities in Cove Communities. (16) Results from 2020 unregulated contaminant monitoring rule (UCMR4) testing for nine Haloacetic Acids (HAA9). CVWD performed this monitoring at select CVWD domestic facilities in Cove Communities. MORE INFORMATION: To receive a summary of CVWD’s source water assessments or additional water quality data or clarification, call CVWD’s Water Quality Division at (760) 398-2651. Complete copies of source water assessments may be viewed at CVWD’s office at75-525 Hovley Lane East, Palm Desert, CA 92211. Este informe contiene información muy importante sobre su agua potable. Tradúzcalo ó hable con alguien que lo entienda bien. También puede llamar al CVWD al número de teléfono (760) 398-2651 ó vaya a cvwd.org/CCR/Spanish2021. Note: Above statement fulfills California Code of Regulations’ requirement in section 64481(I). DETECTED PARAMETER, UNITS PHG or (MCLG)MCL(1) COVE COMMUNITIES(2) RANGE (AVERAGE) ID NO. 8(3) RANGE (AVERAGE) ID NO. 11(4) RANGE (AVERAGE) MCL VIOLATION? (YES/NO) MAJOR SOURCE(S) stisoped larutan fo noisorEoN)DN( 9.6-DN01400.0L/gµ ,cinesrA stisoped larutan fo noisorEoN)DN( 1.0-DN12L/gm ,muiraB A/NL/gm ,edirolhC 500;6001,5 6.6-130 (21)9.1-27 (15)270-620 (450)No Leaching from natural deposits Chlorine (as Cl 2), mg/L(6)MRDLG=4 MRDL=4.0 ND-3.0 (0.51)ND-1.7 (0.74)ND-2.1 (0.73)No Result of drinking water chlorination d larutan fo noisorEoN)71( 32-21)DN( 12-DN05)001(L/gµ ,muimorhC eposits Chromium-6, µg/L(8)0.02 N/A ND-22 (8.7)stisoped larutan fo noisorEoN)61( 02-41 Copper, mg/L(9) [homes tested/sites exceeding AL]0.3 AL=1.3 0.11 [51/0] 0.14 [21/0] 0.15 [20/0]No Internal corrosion of household plumbing fo gnihcaeLoN)DN( 05-DN0027.1L/gn ,)PCBD( enaporporolhcomorbiD banned nematocide which may still be present in soils isorEoN)8.0( 2.1-6.0)5.0( 6.0-4.0)5.0( 0.1-DN0.21L/gm ,ediroulF on of natural deposits Gross Alpha Particle Activity, pCi/L (0)15 ND-15 (ND)ND-7.9 (4.7)ND-4.6 (ND)No Erosion of natural deposits Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), µg/L (7,10)noitanirolhc retaw gniknird fo tcudorp-yBoN)96.0( 11-DN06A/N Hardness (as CaCO3), mg/L 7.6-320 (120)68-220 (140)330-520 (430)No Erosion of natural deposits 9.4-5.2)5.1( 5.2-9.0)4.1( 0.9-DN0101L/gm ,)negortiN sa( etartiN (3.9)No Leaching of fertilizer, animal wastes or natural deposits A/Nstinu ,dlohserht sa rodO 3(1)slairetam cinagro gnirrucco yllarutaNoN)DN( 0.2-DN pH, units 7.7-9.1 (8.1)8.0-8.1 (8.1)7.6-7.7 (7.7)No Physical characteristic stisoped larutan fo noisorEoN)DN( 1.5-DN0503L/gµ ,muineleS Sodium, mg/L 18-110 (31)56-84 (71)67-260 (160)No Erosion of natural deposits A/Nmc/Sµ ,ecnatcudnoC cificepS 1,600;2,2001,5 230-1,100 (400)530-870 (630)1,700-3,000 (2,100)No Substances that form ions when in water A/NL/gm ,etafluS 500;6001,5 ND-270 (51)130-250 (170)340-360 (350)No Leaching from natural deposits Total Coliform Bacteria, positive samples/month (0)5% or 1(11, 12) tnemnorivne eht ni tneserp yllarutaNoN)DN( %7.0-DN A/NL/gm ,sdiloS devlossiD latoT 1,000;1,5001,5 130-720 (250)330-570 (410)1,000-1,700 (1,300)No Leaching from natural deposits Total Trihalomethanes, µg/L (10)N/A 80 ND-22 (17)2.3-20 (11)2.1-14 (8.1)No By-product of drinking water chlorination A/NUTN ,ytidibruT 5(1)stisoped larutan morf gnihcaeLoN)DN( 3.0-DN)DN( 8.1-DN )6.2( 9.2-4.2)4.4( 3.6-9.1 )2.5( 31-DN0234.0L/iCp ,muinarU No Erosion of natural deposits Bromide, µg/L(14)stisoped larutan fo noisorEoN)85( 061-52 Germanium, µg/L(14)stisoped larutan fo noisorEoN)DN( 53.0-DN Haloacetic Acids (HAA6Br), µg/L (14, 15)noitanirolhc retaw gniknird fo tcudorp-yBoN)7.1( 4.9-DN Haloacetic Acids (HAA9), µg/L (14, 16)noitanirolhc retaw gniknird fo tcudorp-yBoN)9.2( 81-DN A/NL/gµ ,esenagnaM 50(1)stisoped larutan fo noisorEoN)DN( 6.1-DN CVWD 2021 Domestic Water Quality Summary (Covering the reporting period January - December 2020) N/A N/A N/A 2020 UNREGULATED CONTAMINANT MONITORING(13) N/A N/A N/A N/A 676 8 | CVWD Visit cvwd.org/rebates for current program details, eligibility requirements, or to apply for rebates and discounts. For questions, call (760) 398-2651 and ask for Water Management. WATER-USEDOs & DON’Ts Applying water to outdoorlandscaping during and within 48 hours after measureablerainfall is prohibited. Irrigating ornamental turf on public street medians is prohibited. Applying water to outdoor landscapes so that runoff flows onto adjacent property and non-irrigated areas such as sidewalks and roadways is prohibited. Using a hose without a shut-off nozzlewhen washing your vehicle or windows is prohibited. Broken sprinklers shall be repaired within 24 hours of notification and leaks will berepaired as soon as practical. Hotels and motels shall provide guests with the option of choosing not to have towels and linens laundered daily. Eating and drinking establishments may serve water only upon request.This includes, but is not limited to, restaurants, hotels, cafes, cafeterias,and bars. Refer to cvwd.org/WaterUse for a complete list. Since July 2020 CVWD invested over $2.85 million to fund rebate and incentive programs that support permanent reductions in water use, part of the ongoing commitment to preserve the long-term health of the groundwater basin. Customers saved over 2.5 billion gallons of water in 2020 and reduced water use by 20% compared to 2013.Since 2009, customers have converted 19.2 million square feet of grass to desert-friendly landscaping through our turf rebate programs, saving an estimated 20,881 acre-feet of water. HOA customers in golf course communities, including pumper and non-potable, participated in two limited-run grant funded programs through December 2019 and converted nearly 250,000 square feet of grass to desertscape. HOA and commercial customers since 2017 have upgraded the hardware on over 877,000 square feet of irrigated landscape to more efficient drip irrigation. The district has awarded outdoor program rebates to more than 7,800 customers. And, CVWD customers have claimed over 10,000 high-efficiency toilet rebates since 2012. Rebates & Discounts CVWD offers rebate programs designed to reduce indoor and outdoor water use for residential, HOA and commercial customers. Most programs require pre-approval. Customers can receive: • $150 rebate for residents installing a high-efficiency washing machine. • $125 rebate for residents installing a hot water recirculating pump. • $100 rebate plus the $10 recycling fee for residents installing high-efficiency toilets. Commercial establishments can receive rebates for half the cost of installing water-efficient toilets. • Free updated indoor water conservation kits for residential customers. • $2 per square foot of turf removed up to 10,000 square feet for residential and 25,000 square feet per project for HOA and commercial customers. • Free installed smart controllers for residents and refunds of 75% of the cost for HOA and commercial customers. • $4 for each installed high-efficiency rotary nozzle for residential, HOA and commercial customers. • $0.50 per square foot rebate for HOA and commercial customers to improve their irrigation system. CONSERVATION 677 9 CVWD has joined with the nonprofit organization Desert Arc to create a program to recycle irrigation controllers that are being replaced with more efficient models. Under the program, CVWD will ask customers participating in the district’s irrigation controller program if they want to recycle their old controllers. The donated old controllers will be collected and recycled by Desert Arc, which provides job training and other services to people with developmental and intellectual disabilities in the Coachella Valley and Morongo Basin areas. “We are excited to work with Desert Arc,” said Katie Evans, Director of Communication and Conservation for CVWD. “Our customers who are already taking advantage of our conservation rebate program to save water and money can feel even better knowing that the old controllers are being recycled by such a valued organization.” “Since its founding in 1959, Desert Arc’s mission is to enhance the lives and create opportunities for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities,” said Richard Balocco, President/CEO of Desert Arc. “Desert Arc is dedicated to social innovation and has created a variety of enterprises such as its Recycling and Shredding Divisions, which are integral to our cause. Our nonprofit organization is committed to implementing eco-friendly business practices by providing these critical and environmentally friendly business services to area companies and individuals alike. We are very pleased to work in partnership with CVWD on this sustainability program.” CVWD Water Management Technician Chris Thomas developed the idea for the collaboration with Desert Arc. He looked at other options for recycling but found that programs sent the devices out of state for recycling. Angelique Ontiveros, Desert Arc’s Director of Business Services, said Desert Arc trains and employs adults with disabilities, while taking into account each client’s unique needs and abilities, enabling them to learn job skills through collecting, processing, and recycling of materials. “This can take the form of picking up a big load of cardboard and inserting it into a baler, or diligently disassembling an old computer to uncover electrical components,” she said. “There are 35 people with disabilities currently working at Desert Arc’s Indio Recycling Center on a full-time basis.” The rebate program provides CVWD residential customers free smart, weather-based irrigation controllers that automatically adjust the irrigation system’s run time based on weather data. CVWD will install and program the controller, free of charge, for eligible customers. Use of a smart controller adjusts watering based on weather. CVWD, Desert Arc partner on new recycling program I thought, let’s do this locally for a win-win,” Chris said. “The devices are getting recycled and the initiative is providing job opportunities to people with disabilities.” CVWD, Desert Arc Partner on New Recycling Program “ Desert Arc meets Water Management Technician Chris Thomas (right) to collect smart controllers for recycling. 678 10 CVWD used construction grants to fund three projects to bring safe, reliable domestic water and fire protection to two Disadvantaged Communities and one elementary school in the Eastern Coachella Valley. Many of these communities rely on private wells and are not connected to the CVWD system. CVWD cannot use ratepayer funds to connect the communities but can seek grants for this work. The California State Water Resources Control Board awarded the water system consolidation grants as part of the Safe and Affordable Funding for Equity and Resiliency Drinking Water Program. ALL THREE PROJECTS ARE NOW COMPLETE: Oasis Gardens Mobile Home Park – This project connected approximately 160 mobile homes to CVWD’s system. The project installed a 125-foot long pipeline, a backflow device, and a fire hydrant to provide fire protection service to the community. Thermal Mutual – Thirty-eight residential properties were linked to a failing 50-year-old well and families experienced low water pressure and sand in their plumbing. The project installed approximately 2,000 feet of 8-inch pipeline in the streets. Westside Elementary School – The private, on-site well at this school in Thermal for nearly 500 K-6 students had no redundancy or back-up power. The project installed an offsite 1,350-foot pipeline for improved water supply reliability and fire flow. CVWD’s efforts to assist communities in the east valley are guided by the Disadvantaged Communities Infrastructure Task Force, which CVWD founded in 2017 to seek grant funding for important infrastructure projects. The Infrastructure Task Force is comprised of representatives from local disadvantaged communities, government agencies and non-profit organizations committed to working on short- term and long-term solutions to ensure that all regional disadvantaged communities benefit. PAYING YOUR BILL Online with a credit card Customers can view bills and pay them online using a credit card. Visit the Pay My Bill section at cvwd.org. Automatic electronic payment Your monthly payment can be automatically deducted from your checking account. To submit your request online, please visit the Pay My Bill section at cvwd.org. Should you have any questions, call Customer Service at (760) 391-9600. Electronic notification when bill is due Save paper by enrolling in our electronic notification program and be notified by e-mail when your new bill is available to view online. To submit your request online, please visit the Pay My Bill section at cvwd.org. Pay by phone To pay by phone, call the CVWD automated system 24/7 at (760) 391-9600. Visa, Mastercard, Discover and American Express are accepted. Pay by mail Mailed payments should be sent to P.O. Box 5000, Coachella, CA 92236. Pay in person Payment with a customer service representative is available in both our Palm Desert and Coachella locations during business hours: 8am – 5pm Palm Desert | 75-525 Hovley Lane East & Coachella | 51-501 Tyler St. Drop boxes are also available at offices in Palm Desert and Coachella. The Palm Desert drop box is open 24 hours a day. Offices are currently closed for walk-in services. Check cvwd.org for updates on offices opening. CVWD Continues Commitment to East Valley, Disadvantaged Communities Thermal Mutual ceremonial wellshut-off with Director Cástulo Estradaand Assemblymember Eduardo Garcia Construction begins at Westside Elementary School 10 679 11 Coachella Valley Water District’s relationship with stormwater protection dates to the early years of the District. A local stormwater district was organized in 1915, three years prior to the formation of CVWD. The two agencies merged in 1937. Today, CVWD’s stormwater system contains approximately 170 miles of regional flood protection facilities within its boundaries. The backbone of this system conveys storm runoff and snow melt through the valley in a 50- mile long channel that runs from the Whitewater area north of Palm Springs and flows southeast through the Coachella Valley to the Salton Sea. This main channel was built to withstand a 100-year flood, or about 39,000 cubic feet per second of stormwater flow. From Palm Springs to Point Happy (near Washington Street in La Quinta) the channel is referred to as the Whitewater River Stormwater Channel, as this reach follows the natural flow path of the Whitewater River Wash (which is stabilized now through improvements and operational maintenance). The reach from Point Happy to the Salton Sea is referred to as the Coachella Valley Stormwater Channel. This reach is manmade and controls the storm flows in defined flow paths that historically meandered unpredictably. Of note this fiscal year, CVWD and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency signed a $59 million loan to help pay for two projects that will reduce flood risk in the Coachella Valley and protect life and property. The low-interest loan was available through the federal Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act. With this loan and other available funds, CVWD expects to substantially complete both projects in 2023. The first project, the Coachella Valley Stormwater Channel Improvement Project, will increase the capacity of two miles of the storm channel between Avenue 54 and Avenue 58. The second project, the North Indio Flood Control Project, will convey flows from the existing channels in Sun City Palm Desert through 3.3 miles of new channels to the existing channels in Sun City Shadow Hills and ultimately to the Coachella Valley Stormwater Channel. This project is a key component in stormwater management for the communities north of Interstate 10, which include North Cathedral City, Thousand Palms, and North Indio. It is expected to remove flood insurance requirements for residents in the area. With the installation of this second project, the pending FEMA certification of the East Side Dike, the upcoming Thousand Palms Flood Control Project, and the North Cathedral City Flood Control Project, over 10,000 acres of land is planned to be protected from flood hazards emanating from three major watersheds that drain over 448 square miles of mountain terrain. To learn more about how CVWD provides stormwater protection to 590 square miles in the Coachella Valley, and other District services, go to cvwd.org/mypromise. CVWD partners with United Way of the Desert to provide the Help2Others Customer Assistance Program, which provides bill pay assistance for eligible water customers. Customers who meet eligibility requirements can receive a one-time credit of $100 on their water bills. Customers can reapply for the credit every 12 months. To make a donation with a credit card, visit unitedwayofthedesert.org/help2others, or mail a check designated to “CVWD Help2Others” to United Way of the Desert: United Way of the Desert CVWD Customer Assistance Program PO Box 13210 | Palm Desert, CA 92255 For more information about the program, visit cvwd.org/H2OHelp. stormwater protection North Indio Regional Flood Control Project 680 12 | CVWD Use of recycled and other nonpotable water sources helps to alleviate overdraft of the aquifer and increased the ability of CVWD to balance the supply of water with demand. Increasing the supply and use of nonpotable water is a key component of CVWD’s long-range water management plans. Those plans to reduce demand on the aquifer emphasize conservation, groundwater replenishment and using recycled and imported water for golf and farm irrigation and large landscape customers. CVWD recycles about three billion gallons of wastewater every year using an advanced multistep process that filters solids, organic materials, chemicals, and germs. Two of the District’s five wastewater reclamation plants treat water that is safe for golf course and landscape irrigation and 41 other uses approved by the State of California. Recycled water is a safe alternative when state guidelines with strict water quality standards are followed and it is used for its intended purpose. CVWD reclamation plants meet these standards by analyzing recycled water samples daily, monthly, quarterly, and annually. The Coachella Valley is home to 120 golf courses. Of the 105 courses in CVWD’s jurisdiction, more than half use nonpotable water for irrigation, either all Colorado River water or a blend of Colorado River water and recycled water. The amount of recycled wastewater produced is not enough to meet the needs of year-round golf course irrigation. Most of the valley’s recycled water is produced in the winter when the population increases. Yet, golf course irrigation water demand is highest in the summer when the population decreases. In 2009, CVWD took a major step to increase the nonpotable water supply for golf courses in the mid-valley area and to reduce demand on the aquifer by completing the Mid-Valley pipeline Project. It brings Colorado River water to the district’s largest reclamation plant in Palm Desert to supplement the recycled water supply. To encourage less water consumption, CVWD offers rebates to golf courses that replace turf with desert friendly, drought tolerant landscaping. Over the last six years, 26 courses received $1,761,212 in rebates from this grant-funded program. Always looking for paths to more water savings and to reduce the groundwater overdraft, CVWD has applied for two Clean Water State Revolving Fund Loans that would extend nonpotable water services to 16 customers and pay for a delivery pipeline. For more, visit cvwd.org/ourpromise. CVWD RECYCLED AND OTHER NONPOTABLE WATER USE CONTINUES TO GROW within CVWD boundaries use a nonpotable blend of recycled water and Colorado River water for irrigation. GOLF COURSES17.5 within CVWD boundaries use only imported Colorado River water delivered from the Coachella Canal or the Mid-Valley Pipeline. GOLF COURSES36.5 to switch from groundwater to nonpotable supplies in the future. ADDITIONAL golf courses plan41 acre-feet of nonpotable water was used in 2020 which made a like amount of groundwater available for drinking and other potable purposes. 41,101 26 golf courses removed over the last six years, resulting in a water savings of more than 956 acre-feet per year. ACRESOF TURF165.42 Aeration basins at Water Reclamation Plant 10 Numbers show success ofCVWD PROGRAMS 681 13 SERVICE INFORMATION Population Served 300,000 Active Accounts 1 110,899 Average Daily Demand 79.4 MGD Total Water Delivered 88,911 AF SYSTEM INFORMATION Active Wells 97 Total Daily Well Pumping Capacity 244 MGD Distribution Reservoirs 64 Storage Capacity 153.2 MG Distribution Piping System 2,025 Miles DOMESTIC (DRINKING) WATER SERVICE AREA 381,479 ACRES SYSTEM INFORMATION Stormwater Channels 17 Length of Whitewater River/ 50 MilesCoachella Stormwater Channel Length of all Regional 169 MilesFlood Protection Facilities STORMWATER PROTECTION Replenishment facilities 4 Replenishment from 175,491 AFimported water Imported supply since 4,444,730 AF1973 through 2020 GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT In cooperation with Desert Water Agency Total on-farm drains 2,298 Miles Acreage with farm drains 37,425 Acres District open drains 21 Miles District pipe drains 166 Miles AGRICULTURAL DRAINAGE SERVICE INFORMATION Active Accounts 24 Average Daily Flow 18 MGD SYSTEM INFORMATION Wastewater Reclamation Plants 2 Total Daily Tertiary Capacity 17.5 MGD Distribution Piping System 31 Miles BLENDED, MVP, RECYCLED WATER 2 SERVICE INFORMATION Irrigable Acres for Service 77,103 Active Accounts 1,305 Total Water Delivered 343,941 AF Average Daily Demand 942 AF Maximum Daily Demand 1,537 AF SYSTEM INFORMATION Reservoirs 2 Storage Capacity 1,361 AF Distribution System 485 Miles Pumping Plants 16 Length of Canal 123 Miles CANAL WATER 1 The number of active service connections excludes fire service. 2 Blended: Recycled water blended with Colorado River water MVP: Colorado River water accessed from the Mid-Valley Pipeline Recycled: Reclaimed wastewater from Wastewater Reclamation Plants 7 and 10 MG: Million gallons | MGD: Million gallons per day | AF: Acre feet SERVICE INFORMATION Population Served 262,217 Active Accounts 96,932 Average Daily Flow 16.58 MGD SYSTEM INFORMATION Wastewater Reclamation Plants 5 Total Daily Plant Capacity 33.1 MGD Collection Piping System 1,159 Miles WASTE WATER $$69,100,025,61769,100,025,617 combined assessed valuation for property within the CVWD service boundaries as of 6/30/2021. full-time & 2 part-time employees budgeted as of 6/30/2021556688 Oasis Reservoir, 60 acre-feet 2020NUMBERSBY THE 682 Printed on recycled paper IRRIGATION GUIDE Adjust your irrigation timer monthly according to the Watering Guide below Individual watering times may vary due to soil and other conditions. Gradually reduce the amount of water you’re using to find an adequate amount for your situation without being wasteful. January 0.7 gal/days, 2 days/week 14 gal/day, 2 days/week 3 min/day, 5 days/week 7 min/day, 5 days/week February 0.9 gal/day, 3 days/week 21 gal/day, 3 days/week 5 min/day, 5 days/week 13 min/day, 5 days/week March 0.9 gal/day, 4 days/week 16 gal/day, 4 days/week 7 min/day, 5 days/week 18 min/day, 5 days/week April 1.0 gal/day, 5 days/week 17 gal/day, 5 days/week 10 min/day, 7 days/week 22 min/day, 7 days/week May 0.9 gal/day, 6 days/week 18 gal/day, 6 days/week 12 min/day, 7 days/week 27 min/day, 7 days/week June 0.9 gal/day, 7 days/week 18 gal/day, 7 days/week 14 min/day, 7 days/week 30 min/day, 7 days/week July 0.9 gal/day, 7 days/week 18 gal/day, 7 days/week 13 min/day, 7 days/week 30 min/day, 7 days/week August 0.9 gal/day, 6 days/week 17 gal/day, 6 days/week 12 min/day, 7 days/week 27 min/day, 7 days/week September 1.0 gal/day, 5 days/week 18 gal/day, 5 days/week 10 min/day, 7 days/week 22 min/day, 7 days/week October 0.9 gal/day, 4 days/week 16 gal/day, 4 days/week 7 min/day, 7 days/week 14 min/day, 7 days/week November 0.7 gal/day, 3 days/week 14 gal/day, 3 days/week 4 min/day, 7 days/week 10 min/day, 7 days/week December 0.7 gal/day, 2 days/week 14 gal/day, 2 days/week 3 min/day, 5 days/week 6 min/day, 5 days/week WATEREFFICIENT SHRUBS WATEREFFICIENT TREES GRASS ON SPRAY SYSTEM GRASS ON ROTARY SYSTEM COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT P.O. Box 1058 Coachella, CA 92236 (760) 398-2651 | cvwd.org A NOTE ABOUT THE CROP REPORT The crop report covering the reporting period from Jan. – Dec. 2020 will be released in a separate document Dec. 2021. 683 3/29/22, 10:59 AM GeoTracker https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/map/?CMD=runreport&myaddress=9003+Shadow+Ridge+Rd%2C+Palm+Desert%2C+CA+92211 1/1 500 m Map data ©2022 GeoTracker  Home  Contact UsSearch for a Project Search for an Address  Download Data  Tools LEGEND - CHOOSE MORE SITES LUST Cleanup Sites - REMOVE Cleanup Program Sites - REMOVE Military Cleanup Sites - REMOVE Military Privatized Sites - REMOVE Military UST Sites - REMOVE Signies a Closed Site ACTIVE MAP COVERAGES: • Military Bases -   - REMOVE Sites Shown on Map: 21 Total Sites  0 Open Sites  21 Closed Sites  1 Sites w/Water Quality Data  LIST SITES VISIBLE ON MAP 684 1 Alyssa Berry From:Records, RRU@CALFIRE <RRURecords@fire.ca.gov> Sent:Thursday, March 31, 2022 2:21 PM To:Alyssa Berry Subject:FW: Public Records Request Good morning, Please see response to your records request below. Thank you, Wanda Scandrick OAII 88 E. Rider St. Perris, CA 92571 Office Number: (951)943-4970 Fax Number: (951)657-5143 From: Reinertson, Kevin@CALFIRE <Kevin.Reinertson@fire.ca.gov> Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2022 10:38 AM To: Records, RRU@CALFIRE <RRURecords@fire.ca.gov> Subject: RE: Public Records Request Good morning, The Office of the County Fire Marshal has no records for the APN provided. However, the APN provided is located in the incorporated City of Palm Desert, please contact the City of Palm Desert City Clerk for the records requested. Additionally, Riverside County Environmental Health is the CUPA for the County, I recommend contacting them for the requested information. https://www.rivcoeh.org/OurServices/HazardousMaterials. or by mail at: Department of Environmental Health P.O. Box 7909 Riverside, CA 92513, 7909 (888) 722-4234 Thank you, Kevin Reinertson Deputy Fire Marshal/Office of the Fire Marshal 685 2 CAL FIRE/Riverside County Fire Department Direct: 951-955-5273 | Main: 951-955-4777 From: Records, RRU@CALFIRE Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2022 11:05 AM To: Reinertson, Kevin@CALFIRE <Kevin.Reinertson@fire.ca.gov> Subject: FW: Public Records Request Good morning, Please see records request below. Thank you Wanda Scandrick OAII 88 E. Rider St. Perris, CA 92571 Office Number: (951)943-4970 Fax Number: (951)657-5143 From: Alyssa Berry <aberry@hillmanngroup.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2022 7:58 AM To: Records, RRU@CALFIRE <RRURecords@fire.ca.gov> Subject: Public Records Request Warning: this message is from an external user and should be treated with caution. Please see the attached public records request Thank you, Alyssa Berry Environmental Technician Hillmann Consulting, LLC 6 Fortune Drive, Suite 301 Billerica, MA 01821 Office: (978) 362-0448 Cell: (714) 438-9946 aberry@hillmanngroup.com www.HillmannConsulting.com 686 3 Your Property. Our Priority. Please consider the environment before printing this email. 687 Printed on Recycled Paper March 29, 2022 Alyssa Berry Hillmann Consulting, LLC aberry@hillmanngroup.com Public Records Request Number: 1-032922-05 Location(s): APNs: 694320010, 694290010; 694320011, & 694290011 Palm Desert, CA 92211 Dear Requestor: On March 29, 2022 the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) received your email of the same date requesting records under the Public Records Act. We were unable to locate an address in the county database using the APNs provided and we are unable to search our records using APNs as our databases do not include this information. If you have a specific address or cross streets, please let us know. A large number of our records are available on EnviroStor, an online database that provides non-confidential, public access to DTSCs data management system. It tracks our cleanup, permitting, enforcement, and investigation efforts at hazardous waste facilities and sites with known or suspected contamination issues. EnviroStor is available 24/7, 365 days a year. The data reflects the latest updates as they are entered in the system. Access it from your computer or smartphone, the local library – anywhere Internet access is available. Just go to www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov. You’ll find a step-by-step tour of EnviroStor under the "How to Use EnviroStor" menu on the website. If you have any questions or would like further information regarding your request, please contact me at 916-255-4159 or via email at PubReqAct@dtsc.ca.gov. Sincerely, Choua Her Choua Her Regional Records Coordinator 688 Your Property. Our Priority. 1745 W. Orangewood Avenue, Suite 110, Orange, CA 92868 Telephone (714) 634-9500 Fax: (714) 634-9507 www.HillmannConsulting.com March 29, 2022 State of California Department of Toxic Substances Control Region 4 – Cypress Regional Office 5796 Corporate Avenue Cypress, CA 90630-4732 Phone (714) 484-5337 Fax (714) 484-5318 PubReqAct@dtsc.ca.gov RE: DTSC Files: Shadow Ridge Road APN: 694320010; 694290010; 694320011 ;694290011 (See map attached) Palm Desert, California 92211 Dear Sir/Madam: Hillmann Consulting, LLC is conducting an environmental investigation of the above referenced property. Under the Freedom of Information Act, we are requesting any information your office has regarding this property. If any records are located, we would like to obtain copies or schedule a file review. If no records are available, please contact me to confirm. Thank you. Sincerely, Alyssa Berry Environmental Technician Hillmann Consulting, LLC aberry@hillmanngroup.com 689 G:\CityClrk\Templates\PAR-Fillable Revised 2/1/22 Official Use Only Documents Produced by: Date:Time: CITY OF PALM DESERT 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, California 92260 info@cityofpalmdesert.org Ph: (760) 346-0611 / Fax: (760) 340-0574 Request for Public Records Completion of this document is suggested for all records requests. In accordance with City Council Resolution No. 08-24, the following fees apply: 15¢ per page for standard reproduction of documents of a size 8½” x 14” or less, 35¢ per page for copying documents from microfilm, $1.00 per page for copying documents of a size 11" x 17" to blueprint-size, actual cost for reproduction of oversize documents or those requiring special processing, actual postage charges, if applicable, and actual cost for third-party retrieval of offsite records, if applicable. For compilation of electronic data/information extraction, the requester may be required to bear the full and actual clerical costs incurred by the City for this purpose. The City Clerk’s Office will make every effort to produce documents immediately upon request; however, there are times when work schedules make it impossible to do so. A member of the City Clerk’s Office will contact you within 10 days of your request to advise when the records will be available. Your cooperation is very much appreciated. Date of Request: Time: Description of Document(s) Requested: (Attach additional sheets if necessary.) Requested by: Name Address Phone Number(s) 3/29/22 Hillmann Consulting, LLC is conducting an environmental investigation of the above referenced property. Under the Freedom of Information Act, we would like to request any information your office has regarding these properties including records of violation, complaints etc. If any records are located, we would like to obtain copies or schedule a file review. If no records are available, please contact me to confirm. Thank you for your assistance. Shadow Ridge Rd APN :694320010; 694290010; 694320011; 694290011 Alyssa Berry 1745 W Orangewood Ave Suite 201, Orange, CA 714-438-9946 690 Your Property. Our Priority. 1745 W. Orangewood Avenue, Suite 110, Orange, CA 92868 Telephone (714) 634-9500 Fax: (714) 634-9507 www.HillmannConsulting.com March 29, 2022 State of California Regional Water Quality Control Board – Santa Ana Region (8) 3737 Main Street, Suite #500 Riverside, CA 92501-3339 Phone (951) 782-4130 Fax (951) 781-6288 FileReview8@waterboards.ca.gov RE: Environmental Files: Shadow Ridge Road APN: 694320010; 694290010; 694320011 ;694290011 (See map attached) Palm Desert, California 92211 Dear RWQCB: Hillmann Consulting, LLC is conducting an environmental investigation of the above referenced property. Under the Freedom of Information Act, we are requesting any information your office has regarding this property. If any records are located, we would like to obtain copies or schedule a file review. If no records are available, please contact me to confirm. Thank you. Sincerely, Alyssa Berry Environmental Technician Hillmann Consulting, LLC aberry@hillmanngroup.com 691 Your Property. Our Priority. 1745 W. Orangewood Avenue, Suite 110, Orange, CA 92868 Telephone (714) 634-9500 Fax: (714) 634-9507 www.HillmannConsulting.com March 29, 2022 Riverside County Fire Department 210 West San Jacinto Avenue Perris, CA 92570 Phone (951) 940-6900 Fax (951) 940-6910 rrurecords@fire.ca.gov RE: Underground Storage Tank/Hazardous Materials Files: Shadow Ridge Road APN: 694320010; 694290010; 694320011 ;694290011 (See map attached) Palm Desert, California 92211 Dear Sir/Madam: Hillmann Consulting, LLC is conducting an environmental investigation of the above referenced property. Under the Freedom of Information Act, we are requesting any information your office has regarding this property. If any records are located, we would like to obtain copies or schedule a file review. If no records are available, please contact me to confirm. Thank you. Sincerely, Alyssa Berry Environmental Technician Hillmann Consulting, LLC aberry@hillmanngroup.com 692 3/29/22, 10:32 AM RealQuest.com ® - Report https://pro.realquest.com/jsp/report.jsp?&action=confirm&type=getreport&recordno=0&reportoptions=0&1648564338899&1648564338901 1/2 Property Detail Report For Property Located At : ,, CA Owner Information Owner Name:MARRIOTT OWNERSHIP RESORTS INC Mailing Address:1200 BARTOW RD #40, LAKELAND FL 33801-5901 C045 C/O PROP TAX Vesting Codes:/ / Location Information Legal Description:11.01 ACRES IN POR W 1/4 OF SEC 32 T4S R6E FOR TOTAL DESCRIPTION SEE ASSESSORS MAPS County:RIVERSIDE, CA APN:694-320-011 Census Tract / Block:449.22 / 1 Alternate APN:694-320-011 Township-Range-Sect:4S-6E-32 Subdivision: Legal Book/Page:Map Reference:/ Legal Lot:Tract #: Legal Block:School District:PALM SPRINGS Market Area:322 School District Name:PALM SPRINGS Neighbor Code:Munic/Township:CITY OF PALM DESERT Owner Transfer Information Recording/Sale Date:/Deed Type: Sale Price:1st Mtg Document #: Document #: Last Market Sale Information Recording/Sale Date:/1st Mtg Amount/Type:/ Sale Price: 1st Mtg Int. Rate/Type: / Sale Type:1st Mtg Document #: Document #:2nd Mtg Amount/Type:/ Deed Type:2nd Mtg Int. Rate/Type:/ Transfer Document #:Price Per SqFt: New Construction:Multi/Split Sale: Title Company: Lender: Seller Name: Prior Sale Information Prior Rec/Sale Date:/Prior Lender: Prior Sale Price:Prior 1st Mtg Amt/Type:/ Prior Doc Number:Prior 1st Mtg Rate/Type:/ Prior Deed Type: Property Characteristics Year Built / Eff:/Total Rooms/Offices Garage Area: Gross Area:Total Restrooms:Garage Capacity: Building Area:Roof Type:Parking Spaces: Tot Adj Area:Roof Material:Heat Type: Above Grade:Construction:Air Cond: # of Stories:Foundation:Pool: Other Improvements:Building Permit Exterior wall:Quality: Basement Area:Condition: Site Information Zoning:>Acres:>11.01 County Use:>HOMESITE/10-49.9 ACRES (A24) Lot Area:>479,596 Lot Width/Depth:> x State Use:>R07 Land Use:>RESIDENTIAL ACREAGE Res/Comm Units:> /Water Type:> Site Influence:>Sewer Type:> 693 3/29/22, 10:32 AM RealQuest.com ® - Report https://pro.realquest.com/jsp/report.jsp?&action=confirm&type=getreport&recordno=0&reportoptions=0&1648564338899&1648564338901 2/2 Tax Information Total Value:$866,406 Assessed Year:2021 Property Tax:$11,376.86 Land Value:$866,406 Improved %:Tax Area:018333 Improvement Value:Tax Year:2021 Tax Exemption: Total Taxable Value:$866,406 694 3/29/22, 10:23 AM RealQuest.com ® - Report https://pro.realquest.com/jsp/report.jsp?&action=confirm&type=getreport&recordno=0&reportoptions=0&1648563799487&1648563799488 1/2 Property Detail Report For Property Located At : ,, CA Owner Information Owner Name:MARRIOTT OWNERSHIP RESORTS INC Mailing Address:1200 BARTOW RD #40, LAKELAND FL 33801-5901 C045 C/O PROP TAX Vesting Codes:/ / Location Information Legal Description:3.48 ACRES IN POR NW 1/4 OF SEC 32 T4S R6E FOR TOTAL DESCRIPTION SEE ASSESSORS MAPS County:RIVERSIDE, CA APN:694-320-010 Census Tract / Block:449.22 / 1 Alternate APN:694-320-010 Township-Range-Sect:4S-6E-32 Subdivision: Legal Book/Page:Map Reference:/ Legal Lot:Tract #: Legal Block:School District:PALM SPRINGS Market Area:322 School District Name:PALM SPRINGS Neighbor Code:Munic/Township:CITY OF PALM DESERT Owner Transfer Information Recording/Sale Date:/Deed Type: Sale Price:1st Mtg Document #: Document #: Last Market Sale Information Recording/Sale Date:/1st Mtg Amount/Type:/ Sale Price: 1st Mtg Int. Rate/Type: / Sale Type:1st Mtg Document #: Document #:2nd Mtg Amount/Type:/ Deed Type:2nd Mtg Int. Rate/Type:/ Transfer Document #:Price Per SqFt: New Construction:Multi/Split Sale: Title Company: Lender: Seller Name: Prior Sale Information Prior Rec/Sale Date:/Prior Lender: Prior Sale Price:Prior 1st Mtg Amt/Type:/ Prior Doc Number:Prior 1st Mtg Rate/Type:/ Prior Deed Type: Property Characteristics Year Built / Eff:/Total Rooms/Offices Garage Area: Gross Area:Total Restrooms:Garage Capacity: Building Area:Roof Type:Parking Spaces: Tot Adj Area:Roof Material:Heat Type: Above Grade:Construction:Air Cond: # of Stories:Foundation:Pool: Other Improvements:Building Permit Exterior wall:Quality: Basement Area:Condition: Site Information Zoning:>Acres:>3.48 County Use:>HOMESITE/1-4.9 ACRES (AP7) Lot Area:>151,589 Lot Width/Depth:> x State Use:>R07 Land Use:>RESIDENTIAL ACREAGE Res/Comm Units:> /Water Type:> Site Influence:>Sewer Type:> 695 3/29/22, 10:23 AM RealQuest.com ® - Report https://pro.realquest.com/jsp/report.jsp?&action=confirm&type=getreport&recordno=0&reportoptions=0&1648563799487&1648563799488 2/2 Tax Information Total Value:$273,840 Assessed Year:2021 Property Tax:$3,655.94 Land Value:$273,840 Improved %:Tax Area:018333 Improvement Value:Tax Year:2021 Tax Exemption: Total Taxable Value:$273,840 696 3/29/22, 10:32 AM RealQuest.com ® - Report https://pro.realquest.com/jsp/report.jsp?&action=confirm&type=getreport&recordno=0&reportoptions=0&1648564367802&1648564367802 1/2 Property Detail Report For Property Located At : ,, CA Owner Information Owner Name:MARRIOTT OWNERSHIP RESORTS INC Mailing Address:1200 BARTOW RD #40, LAKELAND FL 33801-5901 C045 C/O PROP TAX Vesting Codes:/ / Location Information Legal Description:1.04 ACRES IN POR NW 1/4 OF SEC 32 T4S R6E FOR TOTAL DESCRIPTION SEE ASSESSORS MAPS County:RIVERSIDE, CA APN:694-290-011 Census Tract / Block:449.22 / 1 Alternate APN:694-290-011 Township-Range-Sect:4S-6E-32 Subdivision: Legal Book/Page:Map Reference:/ Legal Lot:Tract #: Legal Block:School District:PALM SPRINGS Market Area:322 School District Name:PALM SPRINGS Neighbor Code:Munic/Township:CITY OF PALM DESERT Owner Transfer Information Recording/Sale Date:/Deed Type: Sale Price:1st Mtg Document #: Document #: Last Market Sale Information Recording/Sale Date:/1st Mtg Amount/Type:/ Sale Price: 1st Mtg Int. Rate/Type: / Sale Type:1st Mtg Document #: Document #:2nd Mtg Amount/Type:/ Deed Type:2nd Mtg Int. Rate/Type:/ Transfer Document #:Price Per SqFt: New Construction:Multi/Split Sale: Title Company: Lender: Seller Name: Prior Sale Information Prior Rec/Sale Date:/Prior Lender: Prior Sale Price:Prior 1st Mtg Amt/Type:/ Prior Doc Number:Prior 1st Mtg Rate/Type:/ Prior Deed Type: Property Characteristics Year Built / Eff:/Total Rooms/Offices Garage Area: Gross Area:Total Restrooms:Garage Capacity: Building Area:Roof Type:Parking Spaces: Tot Adj Area:Roof Material:Heat Type: Above Grade:Construction:Air Cond: # of Stories:Foundation:Pool: Other Improvements:Building Permit Exterior wall:Quality: Basement Area:Condition: Site Information Zoning:>Acres:>1.04 County Use:>HOMESITE/1-4.9 ACRES (AP7) Lot Area:>45,302 Lot Width/Depth:> x State Use:>R07 Land Use:>RESIDENTIAL ACREAGE Res/Comm Units:> /Water Type:> Site Influence:>Sewer Type:> 697 3/29/22, 10:32 AM RealQuest.com ® - Report https://pro.realquest.com/jsp/report.jsp?&action=confirm&type=getreport&recordno=0&reportoptions=0&1648564367802&1648564367802 2/2 Tax Information Total Value:$81,828 Assessed Year:2021 Property Tax:$1,152.68 Land Value:$81,828 Improved %:Tax Area:018333 Improvement Value:Tax Year:2021 Tax Exemption: Total Taxable Value:$81,828 698 3/29/22, 10:25 AM RealQuest.com ® - Report https://pro.realquest.com/jsp/report.jsp?&action=confirm&type=getreport&recordno=0&reportoptions=0&1648563910268&1648563910269 1/2 Property Detail Report For Property Located At : ,, CA Owner Information Owner Name:MARRIOTT OWNERSHIP RESORTS INC Mailing Address:1200 BARTOW RD #40, LAKELAND FL 33801-5901 C045 C/O PROP TAX Vesting Codes:/ / Location Information Legal Description:3.21 ACRES IN POR NW 1/4 OF SEC 32 T4S R6E FOR TOTAL DESCRIPTION SEE ASSESSORS MAPS County:RIVERSIDE, CA APN:694-290-010 Census Tract / Block:449.22 / 1 Alternate APN:694-290-010 Township-Range-Sect:4S-6E-32 Subdivision: Legal Book/Page:Map Reference:/ Legal Lot:Tract #: Legal Block:School District:PALM SPRINGS Market Area:322 School District Name:PALM SPRINGS Neighbor Code:Munic/Township:CITY OF PALM DESERT Owner Transfer Information Recording/Sale Date:/Deed Type: Sale Price:1st Mtg Document #: Document #: Last Market Sale Information Recording/Sale Date:/1st Mtg Amount/Type:/ Sale Price: 1st Mtg Int. Rate/Type: / Sale Type:1st Mtg Document #: Document #:2nd Mtg Amount/Type:/ Deed Type:2nd Mtg Int. Rate/Type:/ Transfer Document #:Price Per SqFt: New Construction:Multi/Split Sale: Title Company: Lender: Seller Name: Prior Sale Information Prior Rec/Sale Date:/Prior Lender: Prior Sale Price:Prior 1st Mtg Amt/Type:/ Prior Doc Number:Prior 1st Mtg Rate/Type:/ Prior Deed Type: Property Characteristics Year Built / Eff:/Total Rooms/Offices Garage Area: Gross Area:Total Restrooms:Garage Capacity: Building Area:Roof Type:Parking Spaces: Tot Adj Area:Roof Material:Heat Type: Above Grade:Construction:Air Cond: # of Stories:Foundation:Pool: Other Improvements:Building Permit Exterior wall:Quality: Basement Area:Condition: Site Information Zoning:>Acres:>3.21 County Use:>HOMESITE/1-4.9 ACRES (AP7) Lot Area:>139,828 Lot Width/Depth:> x State Use:>R07 Land Use:>RESIDENTIAL ACREAGE Res/Comm Units:> /Water Type:> Site Influence:>Sewer Type:> 699 3/29/22, 10:25 AM RealQuest.com ® - Report https://pro.realquest.com/jsp/report.jsp?&action=confirm&type=getreport&recordno=0&reportoptions=0&1648563910268&1648563910269 2/2 Tax Information Total Value:$252,593 Assessed Year:2021 Property Tax:$3,379.78 Land Value:$252,593 Improved %:Tax Area:018333 Improvement Value:Tax Year:2021 Tax Exemption: Total Taxable Value:$252,593 700 Hillmann Consulting LLC Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Hillmann Project No.: C3-8984 Shadow Ridge Road, Palm Desert, California APPENDIX G PROJECT PERSONNEL QUALIFICATIONS 701 17 4 5 W . O r a n g ew o o d A v e n u e Su it e 2 0 1 O r a n ge , C A 9 28 6 8 g c y r u l i k @ h i l l m a n n c o ns u l t i n g.c om C O N T A C T I N F O R M A T I O N B .S . Ge o g r a ph y a n d M i n o t i n E n v i r o n m e nt al Sc i e n c e M o n t c la i r S t a t e U n i v e r si t y , M o n t c l air , N J E n v i r o n m e n t a l T e c h n i c i a n E n v i r o n m e n t a l H e a l t h & S a f e t y G A B R I E L A C Y R U L I K P R O F E S S I O N A L E X P E R I E N C E M s . C y r u l i k i s a n E n v i r o n m e n t a l T e c h n i c i a n f o r o u r S o u t h e r n C a l i f o r n i a O f f i c e . M s . C y r u l i k h a s s u p e r v i s e d w o r k p r a c t i c e s a n d c o n t r o l s i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h j o b s p e c i f i c a t i o n s , c u r r e n t E P A , O S H A , a n d s t a t e r e g u l a t i o n s f o r a s b e s t o s a b a t e m e n t p r o j e c t s i n s c h o o l s , a s w e l l a s c o m m e r c i a l , i n d u s t r i a l , p u b l i c , a n d m u l t i -f a m i l y r e s i d e n t i a l b u i l d i n g s . A s a n E n v i r o n m e n t a l T e c h n i c i a n , M s . C y r u l i k p e r f o r m s q u a l i t y a s s u r a n c e a i r s a m p l i n g f o r a s b e s t o s , l e a d , a n d m o l d a b a t e m e n t p r o j e c t s . S h e i s a l s o r e s p o n s i b l e f o r p e r f o r m i n g a i r a n d s u r f a c e h a z a r d m a t e r i a l s t e s t i n g , a n d p o t a b l e a n d n o n -p o t a b l e w a t e r s a m p l i n g . S h e r e g u l a r l y p e r f o r m s I n d o o r A i r Q u a l i t y A s s e s s m e n t s a s w e l l f o r s e v e r a l h i g h -p r o f i l e c l i e n t s . A d d i t i o n a l l y , M s . C y r u l i k i s s k i l l e d a t p e r f o r m i n g P h a s e I e n v i r o n m e n t a l s i t e a s s e s s m e n t s a n d t r a n s a c t i o n s c r e e n s t o m e e t e n v i r o n m e n t a l d u e d i l i g e n c e r e q u i r e m e n t s u n d e r C E R C L A . 7 1 4 -3 9 2-5 9 2 0 E D U C A T I O N W I T H H I L L M A N N S I N C E 2 0 1 9 R E L E V A N T P R O J E C T E X P E R E I N C E T i s h m a n S p e y e r P r o p e r t i e s , n a t i o n w i d e H i l l m a n n h a s b e e n p r o v i d i n g t h e c o m p l e t e e n v i r o n m e n t a l p r o g r a m f o r T i s h m a n S p e y e r ’s p r o p e r t i e s s i n c e 1 9 8 7 . O u r s e r v i c e s i n c l u d e : p h a s e I e n v i r o n m e n t a l s i t e a s s e s s m e n t s , a s b e s t o s s u r v e y s , a i r m o n i t o r i n g , b i d a d m i n i s t r a t i o n , O &M p r o g r a m s , i n d u s t r i a l h y g i e n e , a n d i n d o o r a i r q u a l i t y p r o g r a m s . M s . C y r u l i k f u n c t i o n s a s a n I n d u s t r i a l H y g i e n i s t o n t h i s c o n t r a c t , w h i c h i s o n g o i n g , a n d p e r f o r m s I n d o o r A i r Q u a l i t y A s s e s s m e n t s . B r o o k f i e l d P r o p e r t i e s , v a r i o u s l o c a t i o n s S i n c e 1 9 8 7 , H i l l m a n n h a s p e r f o r m e d i n d u s t r i a l h y g i e n e , m i c r o b i a l , i n d o o r a i r q u a l i t y , a s b e s t o s s u r v e y s , p r o j e c t d e s i g n i n v e s t i g a t i o n s , p r o j e c t m a n a g e m e n t , b u l k s a m p l i n g a n d a n a l y s i s , a n d g e o t e c h n i c a l s e r v i c e s i n n u m e r o u s b u i l d i n g s i n t h e N e w Y o r k a n d L o s A n g e l e s m e t r o p o l i t a n a r e a s . M s . C y r u l i k i s a n I n d u s t r i a l H y g i e n i s t o n t h i s c o n t r a c t . C E R T I F I C A T I O N S O S HA 1 0 -h r C o n s t r u c t i o n S a fe t y & He al t h C A DP H L e a d S a m p l i n g T e c h nic i a n C er t i f i e d i n F i re & S mo k e R e s to r a t i o n 702 17 4 5 W . O r a n g ew o o d A v e n u e Su it e 2 0 1 O r a n ge , C A 9 28 6 8 j t e r w i l l i g e r @ h i l l m a n n c o ns u l t i n g.c o m C O N T A C T I N F O R M A T I O N B .S . E n vi r o n m en t a l S c i e nc e , U n i v e r s i t y o f So u t h er n C a l i f or n i a , L o s A ng e l e s, C A O p e r a t i o n a l M a n a g e r , W e s t C o a s t J . R Y A N T E R W I L L I G E R P R O F E S S I O N A L E X P E R I E N C E M r . T e r w i l l i g e r i s r e s p o n s i b l e f o r b u s i n e s s o p e r a t i o n s , f i s c a l m a n a g e m e n t a n d f i e l d s t a f f m a n a g e m e n t f o r H i l l m a n n ’s C a l i f o r n i a O f f i c e . H e a l s o p e r f o r m s a s b e s t o s s u r v e y s a n d i n v e s t i g a t i o n s t o i d e n t i f y a s b e s t o s a n d l e a d m a t e r i a l s a s s o c i a t e d w i t h o c c u p a t i o n a l h a z a r d s . H e s u p e r v i s e s w o r k p r a c t i c e s a n d c o n t r o l s i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h j o b s p e c i f i c a t i o n s , c u r r e n t E P A , O S H A a n d S t a t e R e g u l a t i o n s f o r A s b e s t o s r e m e d i a t i o n p r o j e c t s i n c o m m e r c i a l , i n d u s t r i a l a n d m u l t i -f a m i l y r e s i d e n t i a l b u i l d i n g s . M r . T e r w i l l i g e r p e r f o r m s I A Q , m o l d a n d m o i s t u r e i n v e s t i g a t i o n s i n c o m m e r c i a l , i n d u s t r i a l a n d r e s i d e n t i a l f a c i l i t i e s n a t i o n w i d e . H e a l s o p e r f o r m s a w a r e n e s s t r a i n i n g f o r a s b e s t o s , l e a d a n d m i c r o b i a l a g e n t s . M r . T e r w i l l i g e r p r o v i d e s l i t i g a t i o n s u p p o r t c o n s u l t a t i o n . (5 5 9 ) 9 0 5 -6 7 44 E D U C A T I O N C E R T I F I C A T I O N S C a l -O S H A C e r t i fi e d A s b e s t o s C o n s u l t a nt C D P H A cc r e d i t ed L e a d I n sp e c t o r /As se s s o r/ P ro j e c t M on i t o r C A C e r t i fie d Sit e S u r v e i l l an c e T ec hn i c i a n O S HA 4 0 - H r H A Z WO P E R W I T H H I L L M A N N S I N C E 2 0 1 6 R E C E N T P R O J E C T E X P E R I E N C E T i s h m a n S p e y e r P r o p e r t i e s , V a r i o u s l o c a t i o n s : H i l l m a n n h a s p r o v i d e d t h e c o m p l e t e e n v i r o n m e n t a l p r o g r a m f o r T i s h m a n S p e y e r ’s p r o p e r t i e s s i n c e 1 9 8 7 . O u r s e r v i c e s i n c l u d e e n v i r o n m e n t a l h e a l t h a n d s a f e t y , i n d u s t r i a l h y g i e n e , p h a s e I e n v i r o n m e n t a l s i t e a s s e s s m e n t s , a s b e s t o s s u r v e y s , a i r m o n i t o r i n g , b i d a d m i n i s t r a t i o n , O &M p r o g r a m s a n d i n d o o r a i r q u a l i t y p r o g r a m s o n v a r i o u s c o m m e r c i a l , i n d u s t r i a l a n d m u l t i - f a m i l y r e s i d e n t i a l p r o p e r t i e s . M r . T e r w i l l i g e r i s a n E n v i r o n m e n t a l S c i e n t i s t o n t h i s c o n t r a c t , c o n d u c t i n g o n -s i t e e n v i r o n m e n t a l s e r v i c e s i n c l u d i n g p h a s e I s i t e a s s e s s m e n t s a n d N P D E S w a t e r q u a l i t y t e s t i n g . W e s t f i e l d – E n v i r o n m e n t a l P r o g r a m , V a r i o u s l o c a t i o n s : S i n c e 2 0 0 0 , H i l l m a n n h a s b e e n p r o v i d i n g a n e n v i r o n m e n t a l p r o g r a m e n c o m p a s s i n g e n v i r o n m e n t a l h e a l t h a n d s a f e t y , P h a s e I e n v i r o n m e n t a l s i t e a s s e s s m e n t s , a s b e s t o s a n d l e a d s u r v e y s , a i r m o n i t o r i n g , b i d a d m i n i s t r a t i o n a n d O &M p r o g r a m s , i n d u s t r i a l h y g i e n e a n d i n d o o r a i r q u a l i t y p r o g r a m s , a n d h a z a r d o u s m a t e r i a l s a s s e s s m e n t s o n t h e i r m a l l p r o p e r t i e s t h r o u g h o u t t h e c o u n t y . M r . T e r w i l l i g e r i s a n E n v i r o n m e n t a l S c i e n t i s t o n t h i s c o n t r a c t p e r f o r m i n g i n d u s t r i a l h y g i e n e s e r v i c e s t h a t i n c l u d e i n d o o r a i r q u a l i t y m o n i t o r i n g , P h a s e I e n v i r o n m e n t a l s i t e a s s e s s m e n t s , a s b e s t o s a n d l e a d s u r v e y s . B r o o k f i e l d O f f i c e P r o p e r t i e s , V a r i o u s s i t e s , C A : H i l l m a n n h a s b e e n p r o v i d i n g h a z a r d o u s m a t e r i a l s s u r v e y s , d e v e l o p m e n t a b a t e m e n t s p e c i f i c a t i o n s , a n d m a n a g i n g t h e o v e r s i g h t a c t i v i t i e s 703 R E C E N T P R O J E C T E X P E R I E N C E C O N T I N U E D d u r i n g t h e a b a t e m e n t a t v a r i o u s B r o o k f i e l d o w n e d s i t e s t h r o u g h o u t C a l i f o r n i a . M r . T e r w i l l i g e r f u n c t i o n s a s a P r o j e c t M a n a g e r f o r t h i s c o n t r a c t . C a l i f o r n i a D e p a r t m e n t o f T r a n s p o r t a t i o n , C e n t r a l V a l l e y a n d N o r t h e r n C A : H i l l m a n n h a s b e e n p e r f o r m i n g a s b e s t o s a n d L e a d - b a s e d P a i n t S u r v e y s f o r t h e C a l i f o r n i a D e p a r t m e n t o f T r a n s p o r t a t i o n . P e r f o r m e d c o m p r e h e n s i v e a s b e s t o s c o n t a i n i n g m a t e r i a l s a n d l e a d -b a s e d p a i n t s u r v e y s o f r e s i d e n t i a l a n d c o m m e r c i a l b u i l d i n g s t h a t w e r e s l a t e d f o r d e m o l i t i o n a n d g e n e r a t e d r e p o r t o f f i n d i n g s i n o r d e r t o a i d t h e D e p a r t m e n t o f T r a n s p o r t a t i o n (D O T ) i n f a c i l i t a t i n g t h e r o a d i m p r o v e m e n t p r o g r a m s a n d b u i l d i n g r e n o v a t i o n s t h r o u g h o u t t h e C e n t r a l V a l l e y a r e a . A l s o , d u r i n g t h e a b a t e m e n t o f a s b e s t o s f r o m D O T o w n e d b u i l d i n g s , p r o v i d e d c o n t r a c t o r o v e r s i g h t a n d a i r m o n i t o r i n g s e r v i c e s f o r r e g u l a t o r y c o m p l i a n c e . V e r i z o n , V a r i o u s S i t e s , C A : H i l l m a n n c o n d u c t e d h a z a r d o u s m a t e r i a l s s u r v e y s , d e v e l o p m e n t a b a t e m e n t s p e c i f i c a t i o n s , a n d p r o j e c t m o n i t o r i n g d u r i n g a b a t e m e n t a t v a r i o u s V e r i z o n o w n e d s i t e s t h r o u g h o u t C a l i f o r n i a . M r . T e r w i l l i g e r f u n c t i o n e d a s t h e P r o j e c t M a n a g e r . P u b l i c S t o r a g e , L o s A n g e l e s , C A : H i l l m a n p r e f o r m e d c o m p r e h e n s i v e a s b e s t o s , l e a d -b a s e d p a i n t a n d u n i v e r s a l w a s t e m a t e r i a l s s u r v e y o f c o m m e r c i a l a n d i n d u s t r i a l b u i l d i n g s t h r o u g h o u t S o u t h e r n C a l i f o r n i a . H a z a r d o u s m a t e r i a l s s u r v e y s w e r e c o n d u c t e d p r i o r t o r e n o v a t i o n f o r t h e s t o r a g e u n i t s . M r . T e r w i l l i g e r d e v e l o p e d a b a t e m e n t s p e c i f i c a t i o n s a n d m a n a g e d t h e a b a t e m e n t a c t i v i t i e s d u r i n g t h e r e n o v a t i o n s o f t h e b u i l d i n g s . H e f u n c t i o n e d a s t h e P r o j e c t M a n a g e r o n t h i s c o n t r a c t . 704 Your Property. Our Priority. Making a better future for all the communities we touch. www.HillmannConsulting.com PHASE I ESA - ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE Instructions: This questionnaire should be completed by the property owner, or representative(s) designated by the owner as being most knowledgeable of the physical characteristics, site use history and environmental condition of the subject property. Please complete, sign at bottom of page 5, and return to Hillmann via email, or in person during the site inspection. Hillmann contact name: __________________ Email:________________@hillmannconsulting.com Document Request/Environmental Report Disclosure: Copies of existing environmental reports and other documents pertinent to the environmental condition of the Property are requested for review. This includes, but is not necessarily limited to, the following types of documents. • Environmental assessments (Phase I ESA, Transaction screen ESA, Preliminary Assessments, etc.) • Subsurface or water testing: (Phase II, site investigation, subsurface testing, drinking water, groundwater monitoring, etc.) • Site remediation documents, and any associated regulatory correspondences • Petroleum storage tank testing/closure reports, and any associated regulatory documents. • Building survey/inspection/testing reports for asbestos, lead, mold or radon; any associated O&M documents • Environmental permits/registrations/certifications (bulk petroleum, waste discharge, emissions, potable wells, etc.). • Environmental/health/fire code regulatory violations or citations Property Details Street address(es) City, ST ZIP: Property ownership entity and primary contact person: (name/company/ph#/email): Tax ID: (block/lot or APN) Contact’s affiliation to owner: (if other than the owner) Property size: (acres or SF) Questionnaire completed by: (if different than above) Total bldg. area: No. of years at, or familiar, with the Property: Number of residential units If residential: No. of years-current ownership: Date(s) of bldg construction: Prior owner name/contact info: (if owned <5 yrs) Current Non-Residential Occupants & Type of Use (For facilities with ≥ 10 non-residential occupants, please provide a copy of the latest rent roll in lieu of completing the table below) Occupant Name: Type of Use: NAICS # (if known) Appx # yrs at Property Amada Lagunas alagunas 9003 Shadow Ridge Road Palm Desert, Riverside County, CA 92211 Jake Hayward/Marriott Ownership Resorts, Inc./(407) 513-6976/Jacob.Hayward@vacationclub. com (PIN/APN) 694320011, (PIN/APN) 694320010, (PIN/APN) 694290010, (PIN/APN) 694290011 Employee 0 N/a 0 705 Phase I ESA-EQ Page 2 of 5 Revised 04/30/2020 Utilities and Services: Type Yes No NA Name of Provider Type Yes No NA Name of Provider Water: Fuel Oil: Sewer: HVAC Maint: Power: Elev Maint: Nat Gas: Septic Maint: Pest Control: Pool Maint: Please answer each question. Check “D/K” for “Don’t Know”. Additional space for comments/details is provided on Page 5. Previous Environmental Investigations 1. Have any previous environmental investigations (see list on Page 1) been performed at the Property? If YES, please briefly elaborate below and forward copies of the report(s): Yes No D/K Property & Adjoining Usage 2. To the best of your knowledge, is the Property or any adjoining property currently occupied or formerly occupied for industrial purposes? If YES, please elaborate below: Property: Yes No D/K Adj. Property: Yes No D/K 3. Is the property or any adjoining property currently used, or have they ever been used, as a gasoline filling station, dry cleaning facility, automotive service/repair shop, auto body repair shop, commercial printing facility, photo development laboratory shop, junkyard, landfill, or as a waste treatment, storage disposal, recycling or processing facility? If YES, please elaborate below: Property: Yes No D/K Adj. Property: Yes No D/K 4. Have any hazardous substances or petroleum products, unidentified waste materials, tires, automotive or industrial batteries, or any other waste materials been dumped above grade, buried and/or burned on the property? Yes No D/K Bulk Storage Tanks 5. Are there currently, or have there been previously, any registered or unregistered above ground or underground storage tanks located at the Property? If YES, please provide number, size, age of tanks, permits, closure reports, regulatory agency correspondence, and related information. Currently: Yes No D/K Previously: Yes No D/K 6. Are there currently, or have there been previously, any vent pipes, or access ways indicating a fill pipe protruding from the ground on the property or adjacent to any structure located on the property? If YES, please elaborate below: Currently: Yes No D/K Previously: Yes No D/K 7. Are there currently, or have there been previously, any leakage of hazardous substances or petroleum products from above ground or underground storage tank systems at the Property? If YES, please elaborate below: Currently: Yes No D/K Previously: Yes No D/K Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD)X Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD)X Southern California Edison (SCE)X X X x x x x x X X X X X X X 706 Phase I ESA-EQ Page 3 of 5 Revised 04/30/2020 Spills, Releases, Wastes 8. Are there currently, or have there been previously, any waste discharges on or adjacent to the property, other than storm water or into a municipal sanitary sewer system? If YES, please elaborate below: Currently: Yes No D/K Previously: Yes No D/K 9. Are there currently, or have there been previous, any septic systems, dry wells or leach fields on the property? If YES, please elaborate below: Currently: Yes No D/K Previously: Yes No D/K 10. Are there currently, or have there been previously, any flooring, drains or walls located within the facility that are, or have been, stained by substances (or, in the case of drains, used for) other than water or are emanating foul odors? If YES, please elaborate below: Currently: Yes No D/K Previously: Yes No D/K 11. Are there currently, or have there been previously, any spills or releases of hazardous substances or petroleum products within the building(s) or on the exterior of the Property? If YES, please elaborate below: Currently: Yes No D/K Previously: Yes No D/K 12. Has any non-native and/or contaminated fill material been deposited on the Property? If YES, please elaborate below: Yes No D/K 13. Have any current or former property occupants generated hazardous wastes or other wastes (such as waste oil, or medical wastes) that required non-conventional storage, handling and/or disposal methods? If YES, please indicate type of waste and the name of the waste handling contractor: Yes No D/K Transformers/Hydraulic Equipment 14. Are any power transformers, capacitors, oil-filled switchgear or hydraulic equipment present at the Property? If YES, please elaborate below; and indicate approximate age and ownership: Yes No D/K 15. If hydraulic equipment is present, indicate approximate age of equipment & ownership: Regulatory Disclosure 16. Have there been any environmental liens or governmental notification or involvement relating to past or current use or disposal of hazardous substances with respect to the property of any facility or structure located on the property? If YES, please elaborate below: Yes No D/K 17. If the property is served by a private well or non-public water system, have contaminants been identified in the well or system that exceed guidelines applicable to the water system, or has the well been designated as contaminated by any government environmental/health agency? (If YES, please elaborate below. If not applicable, please check NO) Yes No D/K x x X X X X X X x x X x X 707 Phase I ESA-EQ Page 4 of 5 Revised 04/30/2020 18. Is there any environmental litigation, administrative action or cleanup action involving the property related to a release or threatened release of any hazardous substance or petroleum product? If YES, please elaborate below: Yes No D/K 19. Are you aware of testing of any environmental media (soil, groundwater, surface water, etc.) at the property which identified levels of contaminants in excess of regulatory standards and/or cleanup guidelines? If YES, please elaborate below: Yes No D/K Additional Environmental/Building Conditions 20.a. Has testing of building materials for asbestos ever been conducted at the Property? If YES, please forward a copy of test results and/or survey reports: Yes No D/K 20.b. Are any asbestos containing materials known to be present at the Property? If YES, please elaborate: Yes No D/K 20.c. Is there an Asbestos Operations & Maintenance (O&M) program in place? If YES, please forward a copy. Yes No D/K 21.a. Has lead paint testing/risk assessment ever been conducted at the Property? If YES, please forward a copy of test results. Yes No D/K 21.b. Is lead-based paint known to be present at the Property? If YES, please elaborate: Yes No D/K 21.c. Is there a lead paint Operations & Maintenance (O&M) (or equivalent) program in place? If YES, please forward a copy. Yes No D/K 21.d. For any residential buildings built prior to 1987, has any testing for lead in drinking water been performed? If YES, please provide a copy of all test results. Yes No D/K 21.e. If Yes to 23.d., has any lead testing of drinking water indicated results exceeding 15 parts per billion (or microgram per liter)? If YES, please elaborate and forward documentation of any mitigation performed to reduce lead concentration in drinking water. Yes No D/K 22.a. Has radon testing ever been conducted at the Property? If YES, please forward a copy of test results. Yes No D/K 22.b. Are there any radon mitigations systems at the Property? If YES, please provide details of the systems including the most recent service records. Yes No D/K 23.a. Are there any problems with water intrusion, water damaged surfaces or excessive mold growth within the buildings? If YES, please elaborate: Yes No D/K 23.b. Is there a Moisture Control (or Mold Management) Program in place If YES, please forward a copy. Yes No D/K 24.a. Are any pest control, pesticides or herbicides products utilized or applied at the Property? If YES, please elaborate. Yes No D/K 24.b. If Yes to 24.a., are all products applied by licensed pest control contractor? If YES, provide company name and any applicable license #s if available. If NO, please describe what products are utilized, who applies them and/or how they are applied or utilized. Yes No D/K X x X X X X X X X X X X X X 708 Phase I ESA-EQ Page 5 of 5 Revised 11/16/2020 Additional Details/Comments: For any questions that warrant further elaboration, please use the following space as necessary, and/or provide documentation along with the completed questionnaire: Certification I, ________________________, state to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, that all of the facts stated in response to the questions and requests for information contained in this Environmental Questionnaire are true. Signature: ________________________________ Date: _______________________ Title: ____________________________________ On behalf of: ___________________________________________ (name of entity) Jake Hayward Manager Feasibility & Planning Marriott Ownership Resort, Inc. 709 APPENDIX D Regulatory Records Documentation 710 FORM-LBC-CCA ®kcehCoeG htiw tropeR ™paM suidaR RDE ehT 6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor Shelton, CT 06484 Toll Free: 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.com Shadow Ridge Road Shadow Ridge Road Palm Desert, CA 92211 Inquiry Number: 07449983.2r September 20, 2023 711 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE Executive Summary ES1 Overview Map 2 Detail Map 3 Map Findings Summary 4 Map Findings 9 Orphan Summary 25 Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking GR-1 GEOCHECK ADDENDUM Physical Setting Source Addendum A-1 Physical Setting Source Summary A-2 Physical Setting SSURGO Soil Map A-5 Physical Setting Source Map A-8 Physical Setting Source Map Findings A-10 Physical Setting Source Records Searched PSGR-1 Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, LLC. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. This Report is provided on an "AS IS", "AS AVAILABLE" basis. NO WARRANTY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, LLC AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES, AFFILIATES AND THIRD PARTY SUPPLIERS DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, OF ANY KIND OR NATURE, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THIS REPORT OR ANY OF THE DATA AND INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THIS REPORT, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES REGARDING ACCURACY, QUALITY, CORRECTNESS, COMPLETENESS, COMPREHENSIVENESS, SUITABILITY, MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, TITLE, NON-INFRINGEMENT, MISAPPROPRIATION, OR OTHERWISE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, LLC OR ITS SUBSIDIARIES, AFFILIATES OR THIRD PARTY SUPPLIERS BE LIABLE TO ANYONE FOR ANY DIRECT, INCIDENTAL, INDIRECT, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR OTHER DAMAGES OF ANY TYPE OR KIND (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO LOSS OF PROFITS, LOSS OF USE, OR LOSS OF DATA) INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THIS REPORT. Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels, or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only an assessment performed by a qualified environmental professional can provide findings, opinions or conclusions regarding the environmental risk or conditions in, on or at any property. Copyright 2023 by Environmental Data Resources, LLC. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, LLC, or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, LLC or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. TC07449983.2r Page 1 712 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC07449983.2r EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR). The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA’s Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments (E1527 - 21), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments for Forestland or Rural Property (E2247 - 16), the ASTM Standard Practice for Limited Environmental Due Diligence: Transaction Screen Process (E1528 - 22) or custom requirements developed for the evaluation of environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate. TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION ADDRESS SHADOW RIDGE ROAD PALM DESERT, CA 92211 COORDINATES 33.7817210 - 33˚ 46’ 54.19’’Latitude (North): 116.3811460 - 116˚ 22’ 52.12’’Longitude (West): Zone 11Universal Tranverse Mercator: 557297.3UTM X (Meters): 3737932.5UTM Y (Meters): 307 ft. above sea levelElevation: USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY 12002826 CATHEDRAL CITY, CATarget Property Map: 2018Version Date: 12002866 MYOMA, CANortheast Map: 2018Version Date: AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY IN THIS REPORT 20200416Portions of Photo from: USDASource: 713 07449983.2r Page 2 6 UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHO GERALD FORD DRIVE/PO ENVIROSTOR, SCH Lower 4049, 0.767, ENE 5 PALM ELEMENTARY/MIDD GERALD FORD DRIVE/MO ENVIROSTOR, SCH Lower 1582, 0.300, North A4 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, 73705 GERALD FORD DR RCRA NonGen / NLR Lower 937, 0.177, NNE A3 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE 73705 GERALD FORD DR CERS TANKS, CERS Lower 937, 0.177, NNE A2 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE 73705 GERALD FORD DR AST Lower 937, 0.177, NNE A1 PALM DESERT SHERIFFS 73705 GERALD FORD DR CERS TANKS, CERS Lower 937, 0.177, NNE MAPPED SITES SUMMARY Target Property Address: SHADOW RIDGE ROAD PALM DESERT, CA 92211 Click on Map ID to see full detail. MAP RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.) ID DATABASE ACRONYMS ELEVATION DIRECTIONSITE NAME ADDRESS 714 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC07449983.2r EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS The target property was not listed in any of the databases searched by EDR. DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES No mapped sites were found in EDR’s search of available ("reasonably ascertainable ") government records either on the target property or within the search radius around the target property for the following databases: STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Lists of Federal NPL (Superfund) sites NPL National Priority List Proposed NPL Proposed National Priority List Sites NPL LIENS Federal Superfund Liens Lists of Federal Delisted NPL sites Delisted NPL National Priority List Deletions Lists of Federal sites subject to CERCLA removals and CERCLA orders FEDERAL FACILITY Federal Facility Site Information listing SEMS Superfund Enterprise Management System Lists of Federal CERCLA sites with NFRAP SEMS-ARCHIVE Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive Lists of Federal RCRA facilities undergoing Corrective Action CORRACTS Corrective Action Report Lists of Federal RCRA TSD facilities RCRA-TSDF RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal Lists of Federal RCRA generators RCRA-LQG RCRA - Large Quantity Generators RCRA-SQG RCRA - Small Quantity Generators RCRA-VSQG RCRA - Very Small Quantity Generators (Formerly Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators) Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries LUCIS Land Use Control Information System 715 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC07449983.2r EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 US ENG CONTROLS Engineering Controls Sites List US INST CONTROLS Institutional Controls Sites List Federal ERNS list ERNS Emergency Response Notification System Lists of state- and tribal (Superfund) equivalent sites RESPONSE State Response Sites Lists of state and tribal landfills and solid waste disposal facilities SWF/LF Solid Waste Information System Lists of state and tribal leaking storage tanks LUST Geotracker’s Leaking Underground Fuel Tank Report INDIAN LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land CPS-SLIC Statewide SLIC Cases Lists of state and tribal registered storage tanks FEMA UST Underground Storage Tank Listing UST Active UST Facilities INDIAN UST Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land Lists of state and tribal voluntary cleanup sites INDIAN VCP Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing VCP Voluntary Cleanup Program Properties Lists of state and tribal brownfield sites BROWNFIELDS Considered Brownfieds Sites Listing ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists US BROWNFIELDS A Listing of Brownfields Sites Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites WMUDS/SWAT Waste Management Unit Database SWRCY Recycler Database HAULERS Registered Waste Tire Haulers Listing INDIAN ODI Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands ODI Open Dump Inventory DEBRIS REGION 9 Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations IHS OPEN DUMPS Open Dumps on Indian Land Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites US HIST CDL Delisted National Clandestine Laboratory Register 716 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC07449983.2r EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 HIST Cal-Sites Historical Calsites Database SCH School Property Evaluation Program CDL Clandestine Drug Labs Toxic Pits Toxic Pits Cleanup Act Sites CERS HAZ WASTE California Environmental Reporting System Hazardous Waste US CDL National Clandestine Laboratory Register Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks SWEEPS UST SWEEPS UST Listing HIST UST Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database CA FID UST Facility Inventory Database Local Land Records LIENS Environmental Liens Listing LIENS 2 CERCLA Lien Information DEED Deed Restriction Listing Records of Emergency Release Reports HMIRS Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System CHMIRS California Hazardous Material Incident Report System LDS Land Disposal Sites Listing MCS Military Cleanup Sites Listing SPILLS 90 SPILLS 90 data from FirstSearch Other Ascertainable Records FUDS Formerly Used Defense Sites DOD Department of Defense Sites SCRD DRYCLEANERS State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing US FIN ASSUR Financial Assurance Information EPA WATCH LIST EPA WATCH LIST 2020 COR ACTION 2020 Corrective Action Program List TSCA Toxic Substances Control Act TRIS Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System SSTS Section 7 Tracking Systems ROD Records Of Decision RMP Risk Management Plans RAATS RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System PRP Potentially Responsible Parties PADS PCB Activity Database System ICIS Integrated Compliance Information System FTTS FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) MLTS Material Licensing Tracking System COAL ASH DOE Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data COAL ASH EPA Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List PCB TRANSFORMER PCB Transformer Registration Database RADINFO Radiation Information Database HIST FTTS FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing DOT OPS Incident and Accident Data CONSENT Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees INDIAN RESERV Indian Reservations 717 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC07449983.2r EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 FUSRAP Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program UMTRA Uranium Mill Tailings Sites LEAD SMELTERS Lead Smelter Sites US AIRS Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem US MINES Mines Master Index File ABANDONED MINES Abandoned Mines FINDS Facility Index System/Facility Registry System DOCKET HWC Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing ECHO Enforcement & Compliance History Information UXO Unexploded Ordnance Sites FUELS PROGRAM EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing PFAS NPL Superfund Sites with PFAS Detections Information PFAS FEDERAL SITES Federal Sites PFAS Information PFAS TSCA PFAS Manufacture and Imports Information PFAS RCRA MANIFEST PFAS Transfers Identified In the RCRA Database Listing PFAS ATSDR PFAS Contamination Site Location Listing PFAS WQP Ambient Environmental Sampling for PFAS PFAS NPDES Clean Water Act Discharge Monitoring Information PFAS ECHO Facilities in Industries that May Be Handling PFAS Listing PFAS ECHO FIRE TRAINING Facilities in Industries that May Be Handling PFAS Listing PFAS PART 139 AIRPORT All Certified Part 139 Airports PFAS Information Listing AQUEOUS FOAM NRC Aqueous Foam Related Incidents Listing PFAS PFAS Contamination Site Location Listing AQUEOUS FOAM Former Fire Training Facility Assessments Listing CA BOND EXP. PLAN Bond Expenditure Plan Cortese "Cortese" Hazardous Waste & Substances Sites List CUPA Listings CUPA Resources List DRYCLEANERS Cleaner Facilities EMI Emissions Inventory Data ENF Enforcement Action Listing Financial Assurance Financial Assurance Information Listing ICE Inspection, Compliance and Enforcement HIST CORTESE Hazardous Waste & Substance Site List HWP EnviroStor Permitted Facilities Listing HWT Registered Hazardous Waste Transporter Database HAZNET Facility and Manifest Data MINES Mines Site Location Listing MWMP Medical Waste Management Program Listing NPDES NPDES Permits Listing PEST LIC Pesticide Regulation Licenses Listing PROC Certified Processors Database Notify 65 Proposition 65 Records HAZMAT Hazardous Material Facilities UIC UIC Listing UIC GEO UIC GEO (GEOTRACKER) WASTEWATER PITS Oil Wastewater Pits Listing WDS Waste Discharge System WIP Well Investigation Program Case List MILITARY PRIV SITES MILITARY PRIV SITES (GEOTRACKER) PROJECT PROJECT (GEOTRACKER) WDR Waste Discharge Requirements Listing CIWQS California Integrated Water Quality System CERS CERS NON-CASE INFO NON-CASE INFO (GEOTRACKER) OTHER OIL GAS OTHER OIL & GAS (GEOTRACKER) 718 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC07449983.2r EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7 PROD WATER PONDS PROD WATER PONDS (GEOTRACKER) SAMPLING POINT SAMPLING POINT (GEOTRACKER) WELL STIM PROJ Well Stimulation Project (GEOTRACKER) BIOSOLIDS ICIS-NPDES Biosolids Facility Data HWTS Hazardous Waste Tracking System PFAS TRIS List of PFAS Added to the TRI MINES MRDS Mineral Resources Data System EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records EDR MGP EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants EDR Hist Auto EDR Exclusive Historical Auto Stations EDR Hist Cleaner EDR Exclusive Historical Cleaners EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives RGA LF Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List RGA LUST Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank SURROUNDING SITES: SEARCH RESULTS Surrounding sites were identified in the following databases. Elevations have been determined from the USGS Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity should be field verified. Sites with an elevation equal to or higher than the target property have been differentiated below from sites with an elevation lower than the target property. Page numbers and map identification numbers refer to the EDR Radius Map report where detailed data on individual sites can be reviewed. Sites listed in bold italics are in multiple databases. Unmappable (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis. STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Lists of state- and tribal hazardous waste facilities ENVIROSTOR: The Department of Toxic Substances Control’s (DTSC’s) Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program’s (SMBRP’s) EnviroStor database identifes sites that have known contamination or sites for which there may be reasons to investigate further. The database includes the following site types: Federal Superfund sites (National Priorities List (NPL)); State Response, including Military Facilities and State Superfund; Voluntary Cleanup; and School sites. EnviroStor provides similar information to the information that was available in CalSites, and provides additional site information, including, but not limited to, identification of formerly-contaminated properties that have been released for reuse, properties where environmental deed restrictions have been recorded to prevent inappropriate land uses, and risk characterization information that is used to assess potential impacts to public health and the environment at contaminated sites. A review of the ENVIROSTOR list, as provided by EDR, and dated 04/24/2023 has revealed that there are 719 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC07449983.2r EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 8 2 ENVIROSTOR sites within approximately 1 mile of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ PALM ELEMENTARY/MIDD GERALD FORD DRIVE/MO N 1/4 - 1/2 (0.300 mi.) 5 19 Status: No Action Required Facility Id: 33650015 UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHO GERALD FORD DRIVE/PO ENE 1/2 - 1 (0.767 mi.) 6 22 Status: No Action Required Facility Id: 33650018 Lists of state and tribal registered storage tanks AST: A listing of aboveground storage tank petroleum storage tank locations. A review of the AST list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there is 1 AST site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE 73705 GERALD FORD DR NNE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.177 mi.) A2 13 Database: AST, Date of Government Version: 07/06/2016 ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks CERS TANKS: List of sites in the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) Regulated Site Portal which fall under the Aboveground Petroleum Storage and Underground Storage Tank regulatory programs. A review of the CERS TANKS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 04/17/2023 has revealed that there are 2 CERS TANKS sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ PALM DESERT SHERIFFS 73705 GERALD FORD DR NNE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.177 mi.) A1 9 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE 73705 GERALD FORD DR NNE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.177 mi.) A3 13 Other Ascertainable Records RCRA NonGen / NLR: RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste. A review of the RCRA NonGen / NLR list, as provided by EDR, and dated 07/24/2023 has revealed that there is 1 RCRA NonGen / NLR site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. 720 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC07449983.2r EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 9 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, 73705 GERALD FORD DR NNE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.177 mi.) A4 17 EPA ID:: CAC003154038 EPA ID:: CAC003199253 721 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC07449983.2r EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 10 There were no unmapped sites in this report. 722 EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.200240 3 2 0 2802 8 0 2 40320 32028 0 280 2 8040 240 28 0280280 24 0 24 0 20 0 2 00723 EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc. 2 4 0 724 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search TargetDistance Total Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Lists of Federal NPL (Superfund) sites 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000NPL 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Proposed NPL 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000NPL LIENS Lists of Federal Delisted NPL sites 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Delisted NPL Lists of Federal sites subject to CERCLA removals and CERCLA orders 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500FEDERAL FACILITY 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SEMS Lists of Federal CERCLA sites with NFRAP 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SEMS-ARCHIVE Lists of Federal RCRA facilities undergoing Corrective Action 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000CORRACTS Lists of Federal RCRA TSD facilities 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500RCRA-TSDF Lists of Federal RCRA generators 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA-LQG 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA-SQG 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA-VSQG Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500LUCIS 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US ENG CONTROLS 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US INST CONTROLS Federal ERNS list 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001ERNS Lists of state- and tribal (Superfund) equivalent sites 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000RESPONSE Lists of state- and tribal hazardous waste facilities 2 NR 1 1 0 0 1.000ENVIROSTOR Lists of state and tribal landfills and solid waste disposal facilities 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SWF/LF TC07449983.2r Page 4 725 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search TargetDistance Total Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted Lists of state and tribal leaking storage tanks 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500LUST 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN LUST 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500CPS-SLIC Lists of state and tribal registered storage tanks 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250FEMA UST 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250UST 1 NR NR NR 1 0 0.250AST 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250INDIAN UST Lists of state and tribal voluntary cleanup sites 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN VCP 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500VCP Lists of state and tribal brownfield sites 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500BROWNFIELDS ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US BROWNFIELDS Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500WMUDS/SWAT 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SWRCY 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001HAULERS 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN ODI 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500ODI 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500DEBRIS REGION 9 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500IHS OPEN DUMPS Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001US HIST CDL 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000HIST Cal-Sites 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250SCH 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001CDL 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Toxic Pits 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250CERS HAZ WASTE 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001US CDL Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250SWEEPS UST 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250HIST UST 2 NR NR NR 2 0 0.250CERS TANKS 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250CA FID UST Local Land Records 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001LIENS TC07449983.2r Page 5 726 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search TargetDistance Total Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001LIENS 2 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500DEED Records of Emergency Release Reports 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001HMIRS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001CHMIRS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001LDS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001MCS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001SPILLS 90 Other Ascertainable Records 1 NR NR NR 1 0 0.250RCRA NonGen / NLR 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000FUDS 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000DOD 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SCRD DRYCLEANERS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001US FIN ASSUR 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001EPA WATCH LIST 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.2502020 COR ACTION 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001TSCA 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001TRIS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001SSTS 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000ROD 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001RMP 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001RAATS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001PRP 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001PADS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001ICIS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001FTTS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001MLTS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001COAL ASH DOE 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500COAL ASH EPA 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001PCB TRANSFORMER 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001RADINFO 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001HIST FTTS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001DOT OPS 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000CONSENT 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000INDIAN RESERV 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000FUSRAP 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500UMTRA 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001LEAD SMELTERS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001US AIRS 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250US MINES 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250ABANDONED MINES 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001FINDS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001DOCKET HWC 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001ECHO 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000UXO 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250FUELS PROGRAM 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250PFAS NPL 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250PFAS FEDERAL SITES 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250PFAS TSCA TC07449983.2r Page 6 727 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search TargetDistance Total Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250PFAS RCRA MANIFEST 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250PFAS ATSDR 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250PFAS WQP 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250PFAS NPDES 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250PFAS ECHO 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250PFAS ECHO FIRE TRAINING 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250PFAS PART 139 AIRPORT 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250AQUEOUS FOAM NRC 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250PFAS 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250AQUEOUS FOAM 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000CA BOND EXP. PLAN 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500Cortese 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250CUPA Listings 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250DRYCLEANERS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001EMI 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001ENF 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001Financial Assurance 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001ICE 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500HIST CORTESE 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000HWP 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250HWT 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001HAZNET 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250MINES 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250MWMP 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001NPDES 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001PEST LIC 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500PROC 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Notify 65 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250HAZMAT 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001UIC 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001UIC GEO 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500WASTEWATER PITS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001WDS 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250WIP 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001MILITARY PRIV SITES 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001PROJECT 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001WDR 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001CIWQS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001CERS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001NON-CASE INFO 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001OTHER OIL GAS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001PROD WATER PONDS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001SAMPLING POINT 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001WELL STIM PROJ 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001BIOSOLIDS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001HWTS 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250PFAS TRIS 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250MINES MRDS EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000EDR MGP TC07449983.2r Page 7 728 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search TargetDistance Total Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.125EDR Hist Auto 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.125EDR Hist Cleaner EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001RGA LF 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001RGA LUST 6 0 1 1 4 0 0- Totals -- NOTES: TP = Target Property NR = Not Requested at this Search Distance Sites may be listed in more than one database TC07449983.2r Page 8 729 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 6.67, Section(s) 25270.4.5(a) HSC 6.67 25270.4.5(a) - California Health and Safety Code, ChapterCitation: 07-28-2022Violation Date: Palm Desert Sheriffs-Central Plant (PD2207)Site Name: 521316Site ID: CERS,Violation Source: HMRRPViolation Program: Riverside County Department of Env HealthViolation Division: 3 years from the date of the training. retained and be made available for inspection for a minimum period of shall provide training to all employees. Documentation shall be observed/provided during inspection. CORRECTIVE ACTION: Owner/operator Returned to compliance on 07/28/2022. OBSERVATION: No training recordsViolation Notes: records for a minimum of three years. hazardous material or failure to document and maintain training safety procedures in the event of a release or threatened release of a Failure to provide initial and annual training to all employees inViolation Description: 6.95, Section(s) 25505(a)(4) HSC 6.95 25505(a)(4) - California Health and Safety Code, ChapterCitation: 07-28-2022Violation Date: Palm Desert Sheriffs-Central Plant (PD2207)Site Name: 521316Site ID: CERS,Violation Source: APSAViolation Program: Riverside County Department of Env HealthViolation Division: Returned to compliance on 07/28/2022.Violation Notes: a statement as to whether the SPCC Plan will be amended. once every five years, document the completion of the review, and sign Failure to complete a review and evaluation of the SPCC Plan at leastViolation Description: 6.67, Section(s) 25270.4.5 (a) HSC 6.67 25270.4.5 (a) - California Health and Safety Code, ChapterCitation: 07-28-2022Violation Date: Palm Desert Sheriffs-Central Plant (PD2207)Site Name: 521316Site ID: Violations: Chemical Storage FacilitiesCERS Description: 10789489CERS ID: 521316Site ID: PALM DESERT, CA 92211City,State,Zip: 73705 GERALD FORD DRAddress: PALM DESERT SHERIFFS-CENTRAL PLANT (PD2207)Name: CERS: Aboveground Petroleum StorageCERS Description: 10789489CERS ID: 521316Site ID: PALM DESERT, CA 92211City,State,Zip: 73705 GERALD FORD DRAddress: PALM DESERT SHERIFFS-CENTRAL PLANT (PD2207)Name: CERS TANKS: 937 ft. Site 1 of 4 in cluster A 0.177 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 298 ft. 1/8-1/4 PALM DESERT, CA 92211 NNE CERS73705 GERALD FORD DR N/A A1 CERS TANKSPALM DESERT SHERIFFS-CENTRAL PLANT (PD2207) S124437532 TC07449983.2r Page 9 730 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation YesViolations Found: 07-28-2022Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEval Program: Riverside County Department of Env HealthEval Division: diesel for back-up generator. A routine inspection was conducted on this date. Facility storesEval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: YesViolations Found: 07-02-2019Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: CERS,Eval Source: APSAEval Program: Riverside County Department of Env HealthEval Division: Not reportedEval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 07-02-2019Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: CERS,Eval Source: APSAEval Program: Riverside County Department of Env HealthEval Division: Not reportedEval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: YesViolations Found: 07-28-2022Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: Evaluation: CERS,Violation Source: HMRRPViolation Program: Riverside County Department of Env HealthViolation Division: Submit photos to this department. Signs shall be posted on the entrance door to the generator room. research chemical safety data sheets and post proper NFPA-704 signs. signs were not posted. CORRECTIVE ACTION: Owner/operator shall Returned to compliance on 08/09/2019. OBSERVATION: Required NFPA-704Violation Notes: Ordinance Business Plan Program - Operations/Maintenance - General LocalViolation Description: Un-SpecifiedCitation: 07-02-2019Violation Date: Palm Desert Sheriffs-Central Plant (PD2207)Site Name: 521316Site ID: CERS,Violation Source: APSAViolation Program: Riverside County Department of Env HealthViolation Division: Returned to compliance on 07/28/2022.Violation Notes: 5. Contents of the SPCC Plan. control laws, rules, and regulations. 4. General facility operations. discharges. 2. Discharge procedure protocols. 3. Applicable pollution personnel: 1. Operation and maintenance of equipment to prevent Failure to provide the following training to all oil-handlingViolation Description: PALM DESERT SHERIFFS-CENTRAL PLANT (PD2207) (Continued) S124437532 TC07449983.2r Page 10 731 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: RiversideAffiliation City: 4065 County Circle Drive, Room 104Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Riverside Cnty Env HealthEntity Name: CUPA DistrictAffiliation Type Desc: (951) 955-4850,Affiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, EDAEntity Name: OperatorAffiliation Type Desc: ,Affiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Development SpecialistEntity Title: Laura BallesterosEntity Name: Identification SignerAffiliation Type Desc: ,Affiliation Phone: 92501Affiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: RiversideAffiliation City: 3450 14th Street, Second FloorAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Laura BallesterosEntity Name: Environmental ContactAffiliation Type Desc: Affiliation: -116.378640Longitude: 33.785870Latitude: Center of a facility or station.,Ref Point Type Desc: Not reportedCoord Name: 10789489Program ID: APSAEnv Int Type Code: Palm Desert Sheriffs-Central Plant (PD2207)Facility Name: 521316Site ID: Coordinates: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEval Program: Riverside County Department of Env HealthEval Division: the emergency generator on site. sheriff’s station with an aboveground diesel storage tank that powers A routine inspection was conducted on todays date. The facility is aEval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: PALM DESERT SHERIFFS-CENTRAL PLANT (PD2207) (Continued) S124437532 TC07449983.2r Page 11 732 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation (951) 955-0911,Affiliation Phone: 92501Affiliation Zip: United StatesAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: RiversideAffiliation City: 3450 14th Street, Second FloorAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: County of RiversideEntity Name: Property OwnerAffiliation Type Desc: ,Affiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Riverside County FMEntity Name: Parent CorporationAffiliation Type Desc: (951) 955-0911,Affiliation Phone: 92501Affiliation Zip: United StatesAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: RiversideAffiliation City: 3450 14th Street, Second FloorAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: County of Riverside (PD2207)Entity Name: Legal OwnerAffiliation Type Desc: ,Affiliation Phone: 92501Affiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: RiversideAffiliation City: 3450 14th Street, Second FloorAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Mailing AddressEntity Name: Facility Mailing AddressAffiliation Type Desc: ,Affiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Laura BallesterosEntity Name: Document PreparerAffiliation Type Desc: (951) 358-5055,Affiliation Phone: 92503Affiliation Zip: PALM DESERT SHERIFFS-CENTRAL PLANT (PD2207) (Continued) S124437532 TC07449983.2r Page 12 733 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedEPAID: Not reportedProperty Owner Country: Not reportedProperty Owner Zip Code: Not reportedProperty Owner Stat : Not reportedProperty Owner City: Not reportedProperty Owner Mailing Address: Not reportedProperty Owner Phone: Not reportedProperty Owner Name: United StatesOwner Country: Not reportedOwner Zip Code: Not reportedOwner State: 73705 Gerald Ford DrOwner Mail Address: 9519554650Owner Phone: 9519554650Operator Phone: County of Riverside Fleet ServicesOperator Name: 92509Mailing Address Zip Code: CAMailing Address State: RiversideMailing Address City: 5293 Mission BlvdMailing Address: Not reportedFax: 9519554650Phone: County of Riverside Fleet ServicesBusiness Name: Not reportedFacility ID: 10330120CERSID: Not reportedTotal Gallons: County of Riverside Fleet ServicesOwner: Not reportedCertified Unified Program Agencies: PALM DESERT,92211City/Zip: 73705 GERALD FORD DRAddress: COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE FLEET SERVICESName: AST: 937 ft. Site 2 of 4 in cluster A 0.177 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 298 ft. 1/8-1/4 PALM DESERT, CA 92211 NNE 73705 GERALD FORD DR N/A A2 ASTCOUNTY OF RIVERSIDE FLEET SERVICES A100419064 Chemical Storage FacilitiesCERS Description: 10330120CERS ID: 108469Site ID: PALM DESERT, CA 92211City,State,Zip: 73705 GERALD FORD DRAddress: COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE FLEET SERVICESName: CERS: Aboveground Petroleum StorageCERS Description: 10330120CERS ID: 108469Site ID: PALM DESERT, CA 92211City,State,Zip: 73705 GERALD FORD DRAddress: COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE FLEET SERVICESName: CERS TANKS: 937 ft. Site 3 of 4 in cluster A 0.177 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 298 ft. 1/8-1/4 PALM DESERT, CA 92211 NNE CERS73705 GERALD FORD DR N/A A3 CERS TANKSCOUNTY OF RIVERSIDE FLEET SERVICES S123499029 TC07449983.2r Page 13 734 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Routine inspection conducted. The facility is a fueling station withEval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 03-17-2023Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: Evaluation: CERS,Violation Source: HMRRPViolation Program: Riverside County Department of Env HealthViolation Division: http://cers.calepa.ca.gov. the statewide information management system at Owner/operator shall submit all required Business Plan sections into system. Specifically, Plans and Inventory. CORRECTIVE ACTION: Business Plan was submitted into the statewide information management Returned to compliance on 09/17/2019. OBSERVATION: An incompleteViolation Notes: quantities. storing/handling a hazardous material at or above reportable Failure to complete and electronically submit a business plan whenViolation Description: 6.95, Section(s) 25508(a)(1) HSC 6.95 25508(a)(1) - California Health and Safety Code, ChapterCitation: 08-21-2019Violation Date: County of Riverside Fleet ServicesSite Name: 108469Site ID: CERS,Violation Source: APSAViolation Program: Riverside County Department of Env HealthViolation Division: Returned to compliance on 12/18/2020.Violation Notes: a statement as to whether the SPCC Plan will be amended. once every five years, document the completion of the review, and sign Failure to complete a review and evaluation of the SPCC Plan at leastViolation Description: 6.67, Section(s) 25270.4.5 (a) HSC 6.67 25270.4.5 (a) - California Health and Safety Code, ChapterCitation: 08-21-2019Violation Date: County of Riverside Fleet ServicesSite Name: 108469Site ID: CERS,Violation Source: HMRRPViolation Program: Riverside County Department of Env HealthViolation Division: certified on at least an annual basis. at http://cers.calepa.ca.gov. Business plans shall be reviewed and updated business plan in the statewide information management system management system. CORRECTIVE ACTION: Owner/Operator shall submit an business plan certification was observed in the statewide information Returned to compliance on 09/17/2019. OBSERVATION: No complete annualViolation Notes: date. business plan is complete and accurate on or before the annual due Failure to annually review and electronically certify that theViolation Description: 6.95, Section(s) 25508(a)(1) HSC 6.95 25508(a)(1) - California Health and Safety Code, ChapterCitation: 08-21-2019Violation Date: County of Riverside Fleet ServicesSite Name: 108469Site ID: Violations: COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE FLEET SERVICES (Continued) S123499029 TC07449983.2r Page 14 735 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedEntity Title: Ray EspinosaEntity Name: Document PreparerAffiliation Type Desc: (951) 358-5055,Affiliation Phone: 92503Affiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: RiversideAffiliation City: 4065 County Circle Drive, Room 104Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Riverside Cnty Env HealthEntity Name: CUPA DistrictAffiliation Type Desc: ,Affiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: County Of Riverside-Fleet ServicesEntity Name: Parent CorporationAffiliation Type Desc: Affiliation: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEval Program: Riverside County Department of Env HealthEval Division: Not reportedEval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: YesViolations Found: 08-21-2019Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: CERS,Eval Source: APSAEval Program: Riverside County Department of Env HealthEval Division: Not reportedEval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 03-17-2023Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: CERS,Eval Source: APSAEval Program: Riverside County Department of Env HealthEval Division: Not reportedEval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: YesViolations Found: 08-21-2019Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: CERS,Eval Source: HMRRPEval Program: Riverside County Department of Env HealthEval Division: at the time of inspection. an aboveground storage tank storing gasoline. No violations observed COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE FLEET SERVICES (Continued) S123499029 TC07449983.2r Page 15 736 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation (951) 600-6591,Affiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: County of Riverside, Fleet ServicesEntity Name: OperatorAffiliation Type Desc: ,Affiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Automotive Service SupervisorEntity Title: Ray EspinosaEntity Name: Identification SignerAffiliation Type Desc: ,Affiliation Phone: 92501Affiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: RiversideAffiliation City: 4293 Orange St.Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Ray EspinosaEntity Name: Environmental ContactAffiliation Type Desc: (951) 955-4659,Affiliation Phone: 92501Affiliation Zip: United StatesAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: RiversideAffiliation City: 4293 Orange St.Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: County of Riverside, Fleet ServicesEntity Name: Legal OwnerAffiliation Type Desc: ,Affiliation Phone: 92501Affiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: RiversideAffiliation City: 4293 Orange StAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Mailing AddressEntity Name: Facility Mailing AddressAffiliation Type Desc: ,Affiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE FLEET SERVICES (Continued) S123499029 TC07449983.2r Page 16 737 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation (951) 955-4659,Affiliation Phone: 92501Affiliation Zip: United StatesAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: RiversideAffiliation City: 4293 Orange St.Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: County of Riverside, Fleet ServicesEntity Name: Property OwnerAffiliation Type Desc: COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE FLEET SERVICES (Continued) S123499029 NoFederal Universal Waste: NoUniversal Waste Destination Facility: NoUniversal Waste Indicator: NoOff-Site Waste Receipt: NoUnderground Injection Control: NoSmelting Melting and Refining Furnace Exemption: NoSmall Quantity On-Site Burner Exemption: NoRecycler Activity with Storage: NoTransfer Facility Activity: NoTransporter Activity: NoMixed Waste Generator: NoImporter Activity: NoShort-Term Generator Activity: OtherOperator Type: Laura BallesterosOperator Name: OtherOwner Type: County Of Riverside, Facilities ManOwner Name: RIVERSIDE, CA 92507Mailing City,State,Zip: 3133 MISSION INN AVEMailing Address: Not reportedState District: Not reportedState District Owner: Not reportedActive Site Indicator: Not reportedAccessibility: Not reportedBiennial Report Cycle: Not reportedNon-Notifier: Not a generator, verifiedFederal Waste Generator Description: Not reportedLand Type: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact Title: LBALLESTEROS@RIVCO.ORGContact Email: Not reportedContact Fax: 951-955-9619Contact Telephone: RIVERSIDE, CA 92507Contact City,State,Zip: 3133 MISSION INN AVEContact Address: LAURA BALLESTEROSContact Name: CAC003154038EPA ID: PALM DESERT, CA 92211Handler City,State,Zip: 73705 GERALD FORD DRIVEHandler Address: County Of Riverside, Facilities ManagementHandler Name: 20211222Date Form Received by Agency: RCRA Listings: 937 ft. Site 4 of 4 in cluster A 0.177 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 298 ft. 1/8-1/4 PALM DESERT, CA 92211 NNE 73705 GERALD FORD DRIVE CAC003199253 A4 RCRA NonGen / NLRCOUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, FACILITIES MANAGEMENT 1027081943 TC07449983.2r Page 17 738 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 20211222Receive Date: Historic Generators: Not reportedOwner/Operator Email: Not reportedOwner/Operator Fax: Not reportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 951-955-9619Owner/Operator Telephone: RIVERSIDE, CA 92507Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 3133 MISSION INN AVEOwner/Operator Address: Not reportedDate Ended Current: Not reportedDate Became Current: OtherLegal Status: LAURA BALLESTEROSOwner/Operator Name: OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator: Not reportedOwner/Operator Email: Not reportedOwner/Operator Fax: Not reportedOwner/Operator Telephone Ext: 951-955-9619Owner/Operator Telephone: RIVERSIDE, CA 92507Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: 3133 MISSION INN AVEOwner/Operator Address: Not reportedDate Ended Current: Not reportedDate Became Current: OtherLegal Status: COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, FACILITIES MANOwner/Operator Name: OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator: Handler - Owner Operator: NoSub-Part P Indicator: NoManifest Broker: NoRecycler Activity Without Storage: NoExporter of Spent Lead Acid Batteries: NoImporter of Spent Lead Acid Batteries: NoRecognized Trader-Exporter: NoRecognized Trader-Importer: 20211222Handler Date of Last Change: Not reportedFinancial Assurance Required: NoSignificant Non-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe: NoAddressed Significant Non-Complier Universe: NoUnaddressed Significant Non-Complier Universe: NoSignificant Non-Complier Universe: N/AGroundwater Controls Indicator: N/AHuman Exposure Controls Indicator: NoInstitutional Control Indicator: NoEnvironmental Control Indicator: No NCAPS rankingCorrective Action Priority Ranking: NoNon-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe: NoSubject to Corrective Action Universe: No202 GPRA Corrective Action Baseline: Not on the Baseline2018 GPRA Renewals Baseline: Not on the Baseline2018 GPRA Permit Baseline: Not reportedSub-Part K Indicator: NHazardous Secondary Material Indicator: Not reportedFederal Facility Indicator: ---Active Site State-Reg Handler: COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, FACILITIES MANAGEMENT (Continued) 1027081943 TC07449983.2r Page 18 739 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No Evaluations FoundEvaluations: Evaluation Action Summary: No Violations FoundViolations: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: OTHER GENERAL GOVERNMENT SUPPORTNAICS Description: 92119NAICS Code: List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions: NoElectronic Manifest Broker: NoNon Storage Recycler Activity: YesCurrent Record: NoSpent Lead Acid Battery Exporter: NoSpent Lead Acid Battery Importer: NoRecognized Trader Exporter: NoRecognized Trader Importer: NoLarge Quantity Handler of Universal Waste: Not reportedState District Owner: Not a generator, verifiedFederal Waste Generator Description: COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, FACILITIES MANAGEMENTHandler Name: COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, FACILITIES MANAGEMENT (Continued) 1027081943 NONEPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -116.3797Longitude: 33.7892Latitude: School DistrictFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt Req: NORestricted Use: Not reportedSpecial Program: 19Senate: 47Assembly: Southern California Schools & Brownfields OutreachDivision Branch: Shahir HaddadSupervisor: Not reportedProgram Manager: DTSCLead Agency: DTSCRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: 24Acres: SchoolSite Type Detailed: School InvestigationSite Type: 404494Site Code: 11/21/2003Status Date: No Action RequiredStatus: 33650015Facility ID: PALM DESERT, CA 92211City,State,Zip: GERALD FORD DRIVE/MONTEREY AVENUEAddress: PALM ELEMENTARY/MIDDLE SCHOOLName: ENVIROSTOR: 1582 ft. 0.300 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 295 ft. 1/4-1/2 PALM DESERT, CA 92211 North SCHGERALD FORD DRIVE/MONTEREY AVENUE N/A 5 ENVIROSTORPALM ELEMENTARY/MIDDLE SCHOOL S118756738 TC07449983.2r Page 19 740 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation * DTSCLead Agency Description: DTSCLead Agency: DTSCCleanup Oversight Agencies: NONational Priorities List: 24Acres: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt. Req.: SchoolSite Type Detail: School InvestigationSite Type: 33650015Facility ID: PALM DESERT, CA 92211City,State,Zip: GERALD FORD DRIVE/MONTEREY AVENUEAddress: PALM ELEMENTARY/MIDDLE SCHOOLName: SCH: Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: Not reportedComments: 11/21/2003Completed Date: Phase 1Completed Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 11/12/2003Completed Date: Site Inspections/Visit (Non LUR)Completed Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 11/26/2003Completed Date: Cost Recovery Closeout MemoCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 33650015Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 404494Alias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: PALM SPRINGS USD-PALM ELEM/MID SCHOOLAlias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: PALM SPRINGS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICTAlias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: PALM ELEMENTARY/MIDDLE SCHOOLAlias Name: NMAPotential Description: NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: NONE SPECIFIED No Contaminants foundPotential COC: PALM ELEMENTARY/MIDDLE SCHOOL (Continued) S118756738 TC07449983.2r Page 20 741 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: Not reportedComments: 11/21/2003Completed Date: Phase 1Completed Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 11/12/2003Completed Date: Site Inspections/Visit (Non LUR)Completed Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 11/26/2003Completed Date: Cost Recovery Closeout MemoCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 33650015Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 404494Alias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: PALM SPRINGS USD-PALM ELEM/MID SCHOOLAlias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: PALM SPRINGS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICTAlias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: PALM ELEMENTARY/MIDDLE SCHOOLAlias Name: NMAPotential Description: NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: NONE SPECIFIED, No Contaminants foundPotential COC: NONEPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -116.3797Longitude: 33.7892Latitude: School DistrictFunding: NORestricted Use: 11/21/2003Status Date: No Action RequiredStatus: Not reportedSpecial Program Status: 19Senate: 47Assembly: 404494Site Code: Southern California Schools & Brownfields OutreachDivision Branch: Shahir HaddadSupervisor: Not reportedProject Manager: PALM ELEMENTARY/MIDDLE SCHOOL (Continued) S118756738 TC07449983.2r Page 21 742 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedComments: 05/03/2004Completed Date: Cost Recovery Closeout MemoCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 04/19/2004Completed Date: Phase 1Completed Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 33650018Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 404493Alias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOLAlias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: PALM SPRINGS USD-UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOLAlias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: PALM SPRINGS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICTAlias Name: NMAPotential Description: NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: NONE SPECIFIED No Contaminants foundPotential COC: NONEPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -116.3679Longitude: 33.7887Latitude: School DistrictFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt Req: NORestricted Use: Not reportedSpecial Program: 19Senate: 47Assembly: Southern California Schools & Brownfields OutreachDivision Branch: Yolanda GarzaSupervisor: Not reportedProgram Manager: DTSCLead Agency: DTSCRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: 34Acres: SchoolSite Type Detailed: School InvestigationSite Type: 404493Site Code: 04/19/2004Status Date: No Action RequiredStatus: 33650018Facility ID: PALM DESERT, CA 92211City,State,Zip: GERALD FORD DRIVE/PORTOLA AVENUEAddress: UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOLName: ENVIROSTOR: 4049 ft. 0.767 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 184 ft. 1/2-1 PALM DESERT, CA 92211 ENE SCHGERALD FORD DRIVE/PORTOLA AVENUE N/A 6 ENVIROSTORUNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL S118756741 TC07449983.2r Page 22 743 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Phase 1Completed Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 33650018Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 404493Alias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOLAlias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: PALM SPRINGS USD-UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOLAlias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: PALM SPRINGS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICTAlias Name: NMAPotential Description: NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: NONE SPECIFIED, No Contaminants foundPotential COC: NONEPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -116.3679Longitude: 33.7887Latitude: School DistrictFunding: NORestricted Use: 04/19/2004Status Date: No Action RequiredStatus: Not reportedSpecial Program Status: 19Senate: 47Assembly: 404493Site Code: Southern California Schools & Brownfields OutreachDivision Branch: Yolanda GarzaSupervisor: Not reportedProject Manager: * DTSCLead Agency Description: DTSCLead Agency: DTSCCleanup Oversight Agencies: NONational Priorities List: 34Acres: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt. Req.: SchoolSite Type Detail: School InvestigationSite Type: 33650018Facility ID: PALM DESERT, CA 92211City,State,Zip: GERALD FORD DRIVE/PORTOLA AVENUEAddress: UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOLName: SCH: Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL (Continued) S118756741 TC07449983.2r Page 23 744 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: Not reportedComments: 05/03/2004Completed Date: Cost Recovery Closeout MemoCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 04/19/2004Completed Date: UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL (Continued) S118756741 TC07449983.2r Page 24 745 ORPHAN SUMMARYCityEDR IDSite NameSite AddressZipDatabase(s)Count: 0 records.NO SITES FOUNDTC07449983.2r Page 25746 To maintain currency of the following federal and state databases, EDR contacts the appropriate governmental agency on a monthly or quarterly basis, as required. Number of Days to Update:Provides confirmation that EDR is reporting records that have been updated within 90 days from the date the government agency made the information available to the public. STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Lists of Federal NPL (Superfund) sites NPL: National Priority List National Priorities List (Superfund). The NPL is a subset of CERCLIS and identifies over 1,200 sites for priority cleanup under the Superfund Program. NPL sites may encompass relatively large areas. As such, EDR provides polygon coverage for over 1,000 NPL site boundaries produced by EPA’s Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC) and regional EPA offices. Date of Government Version: 06/22/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/06/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/24/2023 Number of Days to Update: 18 Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 09/01/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/09/2023 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly NPL Site Boundaries Sources: EPA’s Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC) Telephone: 202-564-7333 EPA Region 1 EPA Region 6 Telephone 617-918-1143 Telephone: 214-655-6659 EPA Region 3 EPA Region 7 Telephone 215-814-5418 Telephone: 913-551-7247 EPA Region 4 EPA Region 8 Telephone 404-562-8033 Telephone: 303-312-6774 EPA Region 5 EPA Region 9 Telephone 312-886-6686 Telephone: 415-947-4246 EPA Region 10 Telephone 206-553-8665 Proposed NPL: Proposed National Priority List Sites A site that has been proposed for listing on the National Priorities List through the issuance of a proposed rule in the Federal Register. EPA then accepts public comments on the site, responds to the comments, and places on the NPL those sites that continue to meet the requirements for listing. Date of Government Version: 06/22/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/06/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/24/2023 Number of Days to Update: 18 Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 09/01/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/09/2023 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly NPL LIENS: Federal Superfund Liens Federal Superfund Liens. Under the authority granted the USEPA by CERCLA of 1980, the USEPA has the authority to file liens against real property in order to recover remedial action expenditures or when the property owner received notification of potential liability. USEPA compiles a listing of filed notices of Superfund Liens. TC07449983.2r Page GR-1 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 747 Date of Government Version: 10/15/1991 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/02/1994 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/30/1994 Number of Days to Update: 56 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4267 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned Lists of Federal Delisted NPL sites Delisted NPL: National Priority List Deletions The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) establishes the criteria that the EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e), sites may be deleted from the NPL where no further response is appropriate. Date of Government Version: 06/22/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/06/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/24/2023 Number of Days to Update: 18 Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 09/01/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/09/2023 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Lists of Federal sites subject to CERCLA removals and CERCLA orders FEDERAL FACILITY: Federal Facility Site Information listing A listing of National Priority List (NPL) and Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) sites found in the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) Database where EPA Federal Facilities Restoration and Reuse Office is involved in cleanup activities. Date of Government Version: 03/26/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/28/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/30/2023 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-8704 Last EDR Contact: 06/23/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/09/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies SEMS: Superfund Enterprise Management System SEMS (Superfund Enterprise Management System) tracks hazardous waste sites, potentially hazardous waste sites, and remedial activities performed in support of EPA’s Superfund Program across the United States. The list was formerly know as CERCLIS, renamed to SEMS by the EPA in 2015. The list contains data on potentially hazardous waste sites that have been reported to the USEPA by states, municipalities, private companies and private persons, pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). This dataset also contains sites which are either proposed to or on the National Priorities List (NPL) and the sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL. Date of Government Version: 06/22/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/06/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/24/2023 Number of Days to Update: 18 Source: EPA Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 09/01/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/23/2023 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Lists of Federal CERCLA sites with NFRAP SEMS-ARCHIVE: Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive TC07449983.2r Page GR-2 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 748 SEMS-ARCHIVE (Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive) tracks sites that have no further interest under the Federal Superfund Program based on available information. The list was formerly known as the CERCLIS-NFRAP, renamed to SEMS ARCHIVE by the EPA in 2015. EPA may perform a minimal level of assessment work at a site while it is archived if site conditions change and/or new information becomes available. Archived sites have been removed and archived from the inventory of SEMS sites. Archived status indicates that, to the best of EPA’s knowledge, assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list the site on the National Priorities List (NPL), unless information indicates this decision was not appropriate or other considerations require a recommendation for listing at a later time. The decision does not necessarily mean that there is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that. based upon available information, the location is not judged to be potential NPL site. Date of Government Version: 06/22/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/06/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/24/2023 Number of Days to Update: 18 Source: EPA Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 09/01/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/23/2023 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Lists of Federal RCRA facilities undergoing Corrective Action CORRACTS: Corrective Action Report CORRACTS identifies hazardous waste handlers with RCRA corrective action activity. Date of Government Version: 07/24/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/31/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/14/2023 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: EPA Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 07/31/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/02/2023 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Lists of Federal RCRA TSD facilities RCRA-TSDF: RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Transporters are individuals or entities that move hazardous waste from the generator offsite to a facility that can recycle, treat, store, or dispose of the waste. TSDFs treat, store, or dispose of the waste. Date of Government Version: 07/24/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/31/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/14/2023 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 07/31/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/02/2023 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Lists of Federal RCRA generators RCRA-LQG: RCRA - Large Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Large quantity generators (LQGs) generate over 1,000 kilograms (kg) of hazardous waste, or over 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 07/24/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/31/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/14/2023 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 07/31/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/02/2023 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC07449983.2r Page GR-3 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 749 RCRA-SQG: RCRA - Small Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Small quantity generators (SQGs) generate between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 07/24/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/31/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/14/2023 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 07/31/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/02/2023 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly RCRA-VSQG: RCRA - Very Small Quantity Generators (Formerly Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators) RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Very small quantity generators (VSQGs) generate less than 100 kg of hazardous waste, or less than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 07/24/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/31/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/14/2023 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 07/31/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/02/2023 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries LUCIS: Land Use Control Information System LUCIS contains records of land use control information pertaining to the former Navy Base Realignment and Closure properties. Date of Government Version: 05/25/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/31/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/24/2023 Number of Days to Update: 54 Source: Department of the Navy Telephone: 843-820-7326 Last EDR Contact: 08/02/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/20/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies US ENG CONTROLS: Engineering Controls Sites List A listing of sites with engineering controls in place. Engineering controls include various forms of caps, building foundations, liners, and treatment methods to create pathway elimination for regulated substances to enter environmental media or effect human health. Date of Government Version: 05/22/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/23/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/24/2023 Number of Days to Update: 62 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-0695 Last EDR Contact: 08/21/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies US INST CONTROLS: Institutional Controls Sites List A listing of sites with institutional controls in place. Institutional controls include administrative measures, such as groundwater use restrictions, construction restrictions, property use restrictions, and post remediation care requirements intended to prevent exposure to contaminants remaining on site. Deed restrictions are generally required as part of the institutional controls. Date of Government Version: 05/22/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/23/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/24/2023 Number of Days to Update: 62 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-0695 Last EDR Contact: 08/21/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC07449983.2r Page GR-4 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 750 Federal ERNS list ERNS: Emergency Response Notification System Emergency Response Notification System. ERNS records and stores information on reported releases of oil and hazardous substances. Date of Government Version: 06/12/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/20/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/14/2023 Number of Days to Update: 55 Source: National Response Center, United States Coast Guard Telephone: 202-267-2180 Last EDR Contact: 06/20/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/02/2023 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Lists of state- and tribal (Superfund) equivalent sites RESPONSE: State Response Sites Identifies confirmed release sites where DTSC is involved in remediation, either in a lead or oversight capacity. These confirmed release sites are generally high-priority and high potential risk. Date of Government Version: 04/24/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/25/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/13/2023 Number of Days to Update: 79 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 07/25/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/06/2023 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Lists of state- and tribal hazardous waste facilities ENVIROSTOR: EnviroStor Database The Department of Toxic Substances Control’s (DTSC’s) Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program’s (SMBRP’s) EnviroStor database identifes sites that have known contamination or sites for which there may be reasons to investigate further. The database includes the following site types: Federal Superfund sites (National Priorities List (NPL)); State Response, including Military Facilities and State Superfund; Voluntary Cleanup; and School sites. EnviroStor provides similar information to the information that was available in CalSites, and provides additional site information, including, but not limited to, identification of formerly-contaminated properties that have been released for reuse, properties where environmental deed restrictions have been recorded to prevent inappropriate land uses, and risk characterization information that is used to assess potential impacts to public health and the environment at contaminated sites. Date of Government Version: 04/24/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/25/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/13/2023 Number of Days to Update: 79 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 07/25/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/06/2023 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Lists of state and tribal landfills and solid waste disposal facilities SWF/LF (SWIS): Solid Waste Information System Active, Closed and Inactive Landfills. SWF/LF records typically contain an inve ntory of solid waste disposal facilities or landfills. These may be active or i nactive facilities or open dumps that failed to meet RCRA Section 4004 criteria for solid waste landfills or disposal sites. Date of Government Version: 05/08/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/08/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/31/2023 Number of Days to Update: 84 Source: Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery Telephone: 916-341-6320 Last EDR Contact: 08/08/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/20/2023 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Lists of state and tribal leaking storage tanks TC07449983.2r Page GR-5 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 751 LUST REG 6L: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Case Listing For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database. Date of Government Version: 09/09/2003 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/10/2003 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/07/2003 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Lahontan Region (6) Telephone: 530-542-5572 Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 9: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Report Orange, Riverside, San Diego counties. For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database. Date of Government Version: 03/01/2001 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/23/2001 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/21/2001 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Diego Region (9) Telephone: 858-637-5595 Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/09/2012 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 8: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks California Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region (8). For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database. Date of Government Version: 02/14/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/15/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/28/2005 Number of Days to Update: 41 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region (8) Telephone: 909-782-4496 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 7: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Case Listing Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Imperial, Riverside, San Diego, Santa Barbara counties. Date of Government Version: 02/26/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/26/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/24/2004 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Colorado River Basin Region (7) Telephone: 760-776-8943 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 5: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Database Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Alameda, Alpine, Amador, Butte, Colusa, Contra Costa, Calveras, El Dorado, Fresno, Glenn, Kern, Kings, Lake, Lassen, Madera, Mariposa, Merced, Modoc, Napa, Nevada, Placer, Plumas, Sacramento, San Joaquin, Shasta, Solano, Stanislaus, Sutter, Tehama, Tulare, Tuolumne, Yolo, Yuba counties. Date of Government Version: 07/01/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/22/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/31/2008 Number of Days to Update: 9 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region (5) Telephone: 916-464-4834 Last EDR Contact: 07/01/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 4: Underground Storage Tank Leak List Los Angeles, Ventura counties. For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database. Date of Government Version: 09/07/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/07/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/12/2004 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Los Angeles Region (4) Telephone: 213-576-6710 Last EDR Contact: 09/06/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/19/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned TC07449983.2r Page GR-6 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 752 LUST REG 3: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Database Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Monterey, San Benito, San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara, Santa Cruz counties. Date of Government Version: 05/19/2003 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/19/2003 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/02/2003 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Coast Region (3) Telephone: 805-542-4786 Last EDR Contact: 07/18/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/31/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 2: Fuel Leak List Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, Napa, San Francisco, San Mateo, Santa Clara, Solano, Sonoma counties. Date of Government Version: 09/30/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/20/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/19/2004 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region (2) Telephone: 510-622-2433 Last EDR Contact: 09/19/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/02/2012 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST: Leaking Underground Fuel Tank Report (GEOTRACKER) Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) Sites included in GeoTracker. GeoTracker is the Water Boards data management system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater. Date of Government Version: 06/05/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/05/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/28/2023 Number of Days to Update: 84 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: see region list Last EDR Contact: 09/06/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/18/2023 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly LUST REG 6V: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Case Listing Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Inyo, Kern, Los Angeles, Mono, San Bernardino counties. Date of Government Version: 06/07/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/07/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/29/2005 Number of Days to Update: 22 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Victorville Branch Office (6) Telephone: 760-241-7365 Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 1: Active Toxic Site Investigation Del Norte, Humboldt, Lake, Mendocino, Modoc, Siskiyou, Sonoma, Trinity counties. For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database. Date of Government Version: 02/01/2001 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/28/2001 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/29/2001 Number of Days to Update: 29 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board North Coast (1) Telephone: 707-570-3769 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned INDIAN LUST R6: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in New Mexico and Oklahoma. Date of Government Version: 04/26/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/09/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2023 Number of Days to Update: 66 Source: EPA Region 6 Telephone: 214-665-6597 Last EDR Contact: 07/17/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/30/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R10: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Alaska, Idaho, Oregon and Washington. TC07449983.2r Page GR-7 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 753 Date of Government Version: 04/20/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/09/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2023 Number of Days to Update: 66 Source: EPA Region 10 Telephone: 206-553-2857 Last EDR Contact: 07/17/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/30/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R5: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land Leaking underground storage tanks located on Indian Land in Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin. Date of Government Version: 04/14/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/09/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2023 Number of Days to Update: 66 Source: EPA, Region 5 Telephone: 312-886-7439 Last EDR Contact: 07/17/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/30/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R8: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah and Wyoming. Date of Government Version: 04/19/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/09/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2023 Number of Days to Update: 66 Source: EPA Region 8 Telephone: 303-312-6271 Last EDR Contact: 07/17/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/30/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R4: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Florida, Mississippi and North Carolina. Date of Government Version: 04/20/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/09/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2023 Number of Days to Update: 66 Source: EPA Region 4 Telephone: 404-562-8677 Last EDR Contact: 05/09/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/30/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R1: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land A listing of leaking underground storage tank locations on Indian Land. Date of Government Version: 04/20/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/09/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2023 Number of Days to Update: 66 Source: EPA Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1313 Last EDR Contact: 07/17/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/30/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R7: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Iowa, Kansas, and Nebraska Date of Government Version: 04/25/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/09/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2023 Number of Days to Update: 66 Source: EPA Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7003 Last EDR Contact: 07/17/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/30/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R9: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Arizona, California, New Mexico and Nevada Date of Government Version: 04/19/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/09/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2023 Number of Days to Update: 66 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 415-972-3372 Last EDR Contact: 07/17/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/30/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC07449983.2r Page GR-8 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 754 CPS-SLIC: Statewide SLIC Cases (GEOTRACKER) Cleanup Program Sites (CPS; also known as Site Cleanups [SC] and formerly known as Spills, Leaks, Investigations, and Cleanups [SLIC] sites) included in GeoTracker. GeoTracker is the Water Boards data management system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater. Date of Government Version: 06/05/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/05/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/28/2023 Number of Days to Update: 84 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 09/06/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/18/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies SLIC REG 1: Active Toxic Site Investigations The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 04/03/2003 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/07/2003 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/25/2003 Number of Days to Update: 18 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region (1) Telephone: 707-576-2220 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SLIC REG 2: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 09/30/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/20/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/19/2004 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region (2) Telephone: 510-286-0457 Last EDR Contact: 09/19/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/02/2012 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SLIC REG 3: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 05/18/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/15/2006 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Coast Region (3) Telephone: 805-549-3147 Last EDR Contact: 07/18/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/31/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SLIC REG 4: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 11/17/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/18/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2005 Number of Days to Update: 47 Source: Region Water Quality Control Board Los Angeles Region (4) Telephone: 213-576-6600 Last EDR Contact: 07/01/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SLIC REG 5: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 04/01/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/05/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/21/2005 Number of Days to Update: 16 Source: Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region (5) Telephone: 916-464-3291 Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned TC07449983.2r Page GR-9 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 755 SLIC REG 6V: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 05/24/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/25/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/16/2005 Number of Days to Update: 22 Source: Regional Water Quality Control Board, Victorville Branch Telephone: 619-241-6583 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SLIC REG 6L: SLIC Sites The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 09/07/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/07/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/12/2004 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Lahontan Region Telephone: 530-542-5574 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SLIC REG 7: SLIC List The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 11/24/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/29/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2005 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: California Regional Quality Control Board, Colorado River Basin Region Telephone: 760-346-7491 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SLIC REG 8: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 04/03/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/03/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/14/2008 Number of Days to Update: 11 Source: California Region Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region (8) Telephone: 951-782-3298 Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SLIC REG 9: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 09/10/2007 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/11/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/28/2007 Number of Days to Update: 17 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Diego Region (9) Telephone: 858-467-2980 Last EDR Contact: 08/08/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/21/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned Lists of state and tribal registered storage tanks FEMA UST: Underground Storage Tank Listing A listing of all FEMA owned underground storage tanks. Date of Government Version: 03/08/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/09/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/30/2023 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: FEMA Telephone: 202-646-5797 Last EDR Contact: 06/27/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/16/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC07449983.2r Page GR-10 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 756 MILITARY UST SITES: Military UST Sites (GEOTRACKER) Military ust sites Date of Government Version: 06/05/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/05/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/28/2023 Number of Days to Update: 84 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 09/06/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/18/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies UST: Active UST Facilities Active UST facilities gathered from the local regulatory agencies Date of Government Version: 06/05/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/05/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/28/2023 Number of Days to Update: 84 Source: SWRCB Telephone: 916-341-5851 Last EDR Contact: 09/06/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/18/2023 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually UST CLOSURE: Proposed Closure of Underground Storage Tank (UST) Cases UST cases that are being considered for closure by either the State Water Resources Control Board or the Executive Director have been posted for a 60-day public comment period. UST Case Closures being proposed for consideration by the State Water Resources Control Board. These are primarily UST cases that meet closure criteria under the decisional framework in State Water Board Resolution No. 92-49 and other Board orders. UST Case Closures proposed for consideration by the Executive Director pursuant to State Water Board Resolution No. 2012-0061. These are cases that meet the criteria of the Low-Threat UST Case Closure Policy. UST Case Closure Review Denials and Approved Orders. Date of Government Version: 05/31/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/02/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/23/2023 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-327-7844 Last EDR Contact: 09/06/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/18/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies AST: Aboveground Petroleum Storage Tank Facilities A listing of aboveground storage tank petroleum storage tank locations. Date of Government Version: 07/06/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/12/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/19/2016 Number of Days to Update: 69 Source: California Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 916-327-5092 Last EDR Contact: 09/07/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/25/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R10: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 10 (Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, Washington, and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 04/20/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/09/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2023 Number of Days to Update: 66 Source: EPA Region 10 Telephone: 206-553-2857 Last EDR Contact: 07/17/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/30/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R9: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 9 (Arizona, California, Hawaii, Nevada, the Pacific Islands, and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 04/19/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/09/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2023 Number of Days to Update: 66 Source: EPA Region 9 Telephone: 415-972-3368 Last EDR Contact: 07/17/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/30/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC07449983.2r Page GR-11 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 757 INDIAN UST R4: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 4 (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee and Tribal Nations) Date of Government Version: 04/20/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/09/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2023 Number of Days to Update: 66 Source: EPA Region 4 Telephone: 404-562-9424 Last EDR Contact: 07/17/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/30/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R7: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 7 (Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, and 9 Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 04/25/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/09/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2023 Number of Days to Update: 66 Source: EPA Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7003 Last EDR Contact: 07/17/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/30/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R1: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 1 (Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont and ten Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 04/20/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/09/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2023 Number of Days to Update: 66 Source: EPA, Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1313 Last EDR Contact: 07/17/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/30/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R5: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 5 (Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 04/14/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/09/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2023 Number of Days to Update: 66 Source: EPA Region 5 Telephone: 312-886-6136 Last EDR Contact: 07/17/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/30/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R6: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 6 (Louisiana, Arkansas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Texas and 65 Tribes). Date of Government Version: 04/26/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/09/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2023 Number of Days to Update: 66 Source: EPA Region 6 Telephone: 214-665-7591 Last EDR Contact: 07/17/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/30/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R8: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 8 (Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, Wyoming and 27 Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 04/20/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/09/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2023 Number of Days to Update: 66 Source: EPA Region 8 Telephone: 303-312-6137 Last EDR Contact: 07/17/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/30/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC07449983.2r Page GR-12 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 758 Lists of state and tribal voluntary cleanup sites VCP: Voluntary Cleanup Program Properties Contains low threat level properties with either confirmed or unconfirmed releases and the project proponents have request that DTSC oversee investigation and/or cleanup activities and have agreed to provide coverage for DTSC’s costs. Date of Government Version: 04/24/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/25/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/13/2023 Number of Days to Update: 79 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 07/25/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/06/2023 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN VCP R1: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 1. Date of Government Version: 07/27/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/29/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2016 Number of Days to Update: 142 Source: EPA, Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1102 Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/01/2024 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN VCP R7: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Lisitng A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 7. Date of Government Version: 03/20/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/22/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/19/2008 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: EPA, Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7365 Last EDR Contact: 07/08/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/20/2009 Data Release Frequency: Varies Lists of state and tribal brownfield sites BROWNFIELDS: Considered Brownfieds Sites Listing A listing of sites the SWRCB considers to be Brownfields since these are sites have come to them through the MOA Process. Date of Government Version: 06/14/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/14/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/06/2023 Number of Days to Update: 84 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-323-7905 Last EDR Contact: 06/14/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/02/2023 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists US BROWNFIELDS: A Listing of Brownfields Sites Brownfields are real property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant. Cleaning up and reinvesting in these properties takes development pressures off of undeveloped, open land, and both improves and protects the environment. Assessment, Cleanup and Redevelopment Exchange System (ACRES) stores information reported by EPA Brownfields grant recipients on brownfields properties assessed or cleaned up with grant funding as well as information on Targeted Brownfields Assessments performed by EPA Regions. A listing of ACRES Brownfield sites is obtained from Cleanups in My Community. Cleanups in My Community provides information on Brownfields properties for which information is reported back to EPA, as well as areas served by Brownfields grant programs. Date of Government Version: 04/06/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/13/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/19/2023 Number of Days to Update: 6 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-2777 Last EDR Contact: 08/30/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/25/2023 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually TC07449983.2r Page GR-13 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 759 Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites WMUDS/SWAT: Waste Management Unit Database Waste Management Unit Database System. WMUDS is used by the State Water Resources Control Board staff and the Regional Water Quality Control Boards for program tracking and inventory of waste management units. WMUDS is composed of the following databases: Facility Information, Scheduled Inspections Information, Waste Management Unit Information, SWAT Program Information, SWAT Report Summary Information, SWAT Report Summary Data, Chapter 15 (formerly Subchapter 15) Information, Chapter 15 Monitoring Parameters, TPCA Program Information, RCRA Program Information, Closure Information, and Interested Parties Information. Date of Government Version: 04/01/2000 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/10/2000 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/10/2000 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-227-4448 Last EDR Contact: 07/19/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/06/2023 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SWRCY: Recycler Database A listing of recycling facilities in California. Date of Government Version: 06/02/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/02/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/23/2023 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: Department of Conservation Telephone: 916-323-3836 Last EDR Contact: 09/06/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/18/2023 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly HAULERS: Registered Waste Tire Haulers Listing A listing of registered waste tire haulers. Date of Government Version: 11/16/2022 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/22/2022 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/13/2023 Number of Days to Update: 83 Source: Integrated Waste Management Board Telephone: 916-341-6422 Last EDR Contact: 08/29/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/20/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN ODI: Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands Location of open dumps on Indian land. Date of Government Version: 12/31/1998 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/03/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/24/2008 Number of Days to Update: 52 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-308-8245 Last EDR Contact: 07/19/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/06/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies DEBRIS REGION 9: Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations A listing of illegal dump sites location on the Torres Martinez Indian Reservation located in eastern Riverside County and northern Imperial County, California. Date of Government Version: 01/12/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/07/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/21/2009 Number of Days to Update: 137 Source: EPA, Region 9 Telephone: 415-947-4219 Last EDR Contact: 07/11/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/30/2023 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned ODI: Open Dump Inventory An open dump is defined as a disposal facility that does not comply with one or more of the Part 257 or Part 258 Subtitle D Criteria. Date of Government Version: 06/30/1985 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/09/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/17/2004 Number of Days to Update: 39 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 06/09/2004 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned TC07449983.2r Page GR-14 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 760 IHS OPEN DUMPS: Open Dumps on Indian Land A listing of all open dumps located on Indian Land in the United States. Date of Government Version: 04/01/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/06/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015 Number of Days to Update: 176 Source: Department of Health & Human Serivces, Indian Health Service Telephone: 301-443-1452 Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/13/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites US HIST CDL: National Clandestine Laboratory Register A listing of clandestine drug lab locations that have been removed from the DEAs National Clandestine Laboratory Register. Date of Government Version: 05/22/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/23/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/10/2023 Number of Days to Update: 48 Source: Drug Enforcement Administration Telephone: 202-307-1000 Last EDR Contact: 08/21/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2023 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned HIST CAL-SITES: Calsites Database The Calsites database contains potential or confirmed hazardous substance release properties. In 1996, California EPA reevaluated and significantly reduced the number of sites in the Calsites database. No longer updated by the state agency. It has been replaced by ENVIROSTOR. Date of Government Version: 08/08/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/03/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/24/2006 Number of Days to Update: 21 Source: Department of Toxic Substance Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 02/23/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/25/2009 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SCH: School Property Evaluation Program This category contains proposed and existing school sites that are being evaluated by DTSC for possible hazardous materials contamination. In some cases, these properties may be listed in the CalSites category depending on the level of threat to public health and safety or the environment they pose. Date of Government Version: 04/24/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/25/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/13/2023 Number of Days to Update: 79 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 07/25/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/06/2023 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly CDL: Clandestine Drug Labs A listing of drug lab locations. Listing of a location in this database does not indicate that any illegal drug lab materials were or were not present there, and does not constitute a determination that the location either requires or does not require additional cleanup work. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/30/2022 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/09/2023 Number of Days to Update: 71 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-255-6504 Last EDR Contact: 09/15/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/13/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies CERS HAZ WASTE: California Environmental Reporting System Hazardous Waste List of sites in the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) Regulated Site Portal which fall under the Hazardous Chemical Management, Hazardous Waste Onsite Treatment, Household Hazardous Waste Collection, Hazardous Waste Generator, and RCRA LQ HW Generator programs. TC07449983.2r Page GR-15 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 761 Date of Government Version: 04/17/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/18/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/11/2023 Number of Days to Update: 84 Source: CalEPA Telephone: 916-323-2514 Last EDR Contact: 07/18/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/30/2023 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TOXIC PITS: Toxic Pits Cleanup Act Sites Toxic PITS Cleanup Act Sites. TOXIC PITS identifies sites suspected of containing hazardous substances where cleanup has not yet been completed. Date of Government Version: 07/01/1995 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/30/1995 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/26/1995 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-227-4364 Last EDR Contact: 01/26/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/27/2009 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned US CDL: Clandestine Drug Labs A listing of clandestine drug lab locations. The U.S. Department of Justice ("the Department") provides this web site as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites. In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry and does not guarantee its accuracy. Members of the public must verify the accuracy of all entries by, for example, contacting local law enforcement and local health departments. Date of Government Version: 05/22/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/23/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/10/2023 Number of Days to Update: 48 Source: Drug Enforcement Administration Telephone: 202-307-1000 Last EDR Contact: 08/21/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2023 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks SWEEPS UST: SWEEPS UST Listing Statewide Environmental Evaluation and Planning System. This underground storage tank listing was updated and maintained by a company contacted by the SWRCB in the early 1990’s. The listing is no longer updated or maintained. The local agency is the contact for more information on a site on the SWEEPS list. Date of Government Version: 06/01/1994 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/07/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/11/2005 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/03/2005 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned HIST UST: Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database The Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database is a historical listing of UST sites. Refer to local/county source for current data. Date of Government Version: 10/15/1990 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/25/1991 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/12/1991 Number of Days to Update: 18 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-341-5851 Last EDR Contact: 07/26/2001 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SAN FRANCISCO AST: Aboveground Storage Tank Site Listing Aboveground storage tank sites Date of Government Version: 04/28/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/28/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2023 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: San Francisco County Department of Public Health Telephone: 415-252-3896 Last EDR Contact: 07/26/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/13/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC07449983.2r Page GR-16 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 762 CA FID UST: Facility Inventory Database The Facility Inventory Database (FID) contains a historical listing of active and inactive underground storage tank locations from the State Water Resource Control Board. Refer to local/county source for current data. Date of Government Version: 10/31/1994 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/05/1995 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/1995 Number of Days to Update: 24 Source: California Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 916-341-5851 Last EDR Contact: 12/28/1998 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned CERS TANKS: California Environmental Reporting System (CERS) Tanks List of sites in the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) Regulated Site Portal which fall under the Aboveground Petroleum Storage and Underground Storage Tank regulatory programs. Date of Government Version: 04/17/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/18/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/06/2023 Number of Days to Update: 79 Source: California Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 916-323-2514 Last EDR Contact: 07/18/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/30/2023 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Local Land Records LIENS: Environmental Liens Listing A listing of property locations with environmental liens for California where DTSC is a lien holder. Date of Government Version: 06/06/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/07/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/25/2023 Number of Days to Update: 79 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 08/22/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/11/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies LIENS 2: CERCLA Lien Information A Federal CERCLA (’Superfund’) lien can exist by operation of law at any site or property at which EPA has spent Superfund monies. These monies are spent to investigate and address releases and threatened releases of contamination. CERCLIS provides information as to the identity of these sites and properties. Date of Government Version: 06/22/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/06/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/24/2023 Number of Days to Update: 18 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-6023 Last EDR Contact: 09/01/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/09/2023 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually DEED: Deed Restriction Listing Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program Facility Sites with Deed Restrictions & Hazardous Waste Management Program Facility Sites with Deed / Land Use Restriction. The DTSC Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program (SMBRP) list includes sites cleaned up under the program’s oversight and generally does not include current or former hazardous waste facilities that required a hazardous waste facility permit. The list represents deed restrictions that are active. Some sites have multiple deed restrictions. The DTSC Hazardous Waste Management Program (HWMP) has developed a list of current or former hazardous waste facilities that have a recorded land use restriction at the local county recorder’s office. The land use restrictions on this list were required by the DTSC HWMP as a result of the presence of hazardous substances that remain on site after the facility (or part of the facility) has been closed or cleaned up. The types of land use restriction include deed notice, deed restriction, or a land use restriction that binds current and future owners. Date of Government Version: 05/25/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/25/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/14/2023 Number of Days to Update: 81 Source: DTSC and SWRCB Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 08/29/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/11/2023 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Records of Emergency Release Reports TC07449983.2r Page GR-17 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 763 HMIRS: Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System Hazardous Materials Incident Report System. HMIRS contains hazardous material spill incidents reported to DOT. Date of Government Version: 03/19/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/21/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/30/2023 Number of Days to Update: 70 Source: U.S. Department of Transportation Telephone: 202-366-4555 Last EDR Contact: 06/20/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/02/2023 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly CHMIRS: California Hazardous Material Incident Report System California Hazardous Material Incident Reporting System. CHMIRS contains information on reported hazardous material incidents (accidental releases or spills). Date of Government Version: 04/15/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/28/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2023 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: Office of Emergency Services Telephone: 916-845-8400 Last EDR Contact: 07/18/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/30/2023 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually LDS: Land Disposal Sites Listing (GEOTRACKER) Land Disposal sites (Landfills) included in GeoTracker. GeoTracker is the Water Boards data management system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater. Date of Government Version: 06/05/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/05/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/25/2023 Number of Days to Update: 81 Source: State Water Qualilty Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 09/06/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/18/2023 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly MCS: Military Cleanup Sites Listing (GEOTRACKER) Military sites (consisting of: Military UST sites; Military Privatized sites; and Military Cleanup sites [formerly known as DoD non UST]) included in GeoTracker. GeoTracker is the Water Boards data management system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater. Date of Government Version: 06/05/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/05/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/25/2023 Number of Days to Update: 81 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 09/06/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/18/2023 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SPILLS 90: SPILLS90 data from FirstSearch Spills 90 includes those spill and release records available exclusively from FirstSearch databases. Typically, they may include chemical, oil and/or hazardous substance spills recorded after 1990. Duplicate records that are already included in EDR incident and release records are not included in Spills 90. Date of Government Version: 06/06/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/03/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/22/2013 Number of Days to Update: 50 Source: FirstSearch Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned Other Ascertainable Records RCRA NonGen / NLR: RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer Regulated RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste. TC07449983.2r Page GR-18 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 764 Date of Government Version: 07/24/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/31/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/14/2023 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 07/31/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/02/2023 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FUDS: Formerly Used Defense Sites The listing includes locations of Formerly Used Defense Sites properties where the US Army Corps of Engineers is actively working or will take necessary cleanup actions. Date of Government Version: 05/08/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/16/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/10/2023 Number of Days to Update: 55 Source: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Telephone: 202-528-4285 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/27/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies DOD: Department of Defense Sites This data set consists of federally owned or administered lands, administered by the Department of Defense, that have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres of the United States, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Date of Government Version: 06/07/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/13/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/09/2022 Number of Days to Update: 239 Source: USGS Telephone: 888-275-8747 Last EDR Contact: 07/10/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/23/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies FEDLAND: Federal and Indian Lands Federally and Indian administrated lands of the United States. Lands included are administrated by: Army Corps of Engineers, Bureau of Reclamation, National Wild and Scenic River, National Wildlife Refuge, Public Domain Land, Wilderness, Wilderness Study Area, Wildlife Management Area, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Bureau of Land Management, Department of Justice, Forest Service, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Park Service. Date of Government Version: 04/02/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/11/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/06/2019 Number of Days to Update: 574 Source: U.S. Geological Survey Telephone: 888-275-8747 Last EDR Contact: 07/05/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/16/2023 Data Release Frequency: N/A SCRD DRYCLEANERS: State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing The State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners was established in 1998, with support from the U.S. EPA Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation. It is comprised of representatives of states with established drycleaner remediation programs. Currently the member states are Alabama, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Wisconsin. Date of Government Version: 07/30/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/03/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2023 Number of Days to Update: 7 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 615-532-8599 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/20/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies US FIN ASSUR: Financial Assurance Information All owners and operators of facilities that treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste are required to provide proof that they will have sufficient funds to pay for the clean up, closure, and post-closure care of their facilities. Date of Government Version: 06/19/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/20/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/14/2023 Number of Days to Update: 55 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-1917 Last EDR Contact: 06/20/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/02/2023 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC07449983.2r Page GR-19 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 765 EPA WATCH LIST: EPA WATCH LIST EPA maintains a "Watch List" to facilitate dialogue between EPA, state and local environmental agencies on enforcement matters relating to facilities with alleged violations identified as either significant or high priority. Being on the Watch List does not mean that the facility has actually violated the law only that an investigation by EPA or a state or local environmental agency has led those organizations to allege that an unproven violation has in fact occurred. Being on the Watch List does not represent a higher level of concern regarding the alleged violations that were detected, but instead indicates cases requiring additional dialogue between EPA, state and local agencies - primarily because of the length of time the alleged violation has gone unaddressed or unresolved. Date of Government Version: 08/30/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/21/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/17/2014 Number of Days to Update: 88 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 617-520-3000 Last EDR Contact: 07/31/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/13/2023 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly 2020 COR ACTION: 2020 Corrective Action Program List The EPA has set ambitious goals for the RCRA Corrective Action program by creating the 2020 Corrective Action Universe. This RCRA cleanup baseline includes facilities expected to need corrective action. The 2020 universe contains a wide variety of sites. Some properties are heavily contaminated while others were contaminated but have since been cleaned up. Still others have not been fully investigated yet, and may require little or no remediation. Inclusion in the 2020 Universe does not necessarily imply failure on the part of a facility to meet its RCRA obligations. Date of Government Version: 09/30/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/08/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 73 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-308-4044 Last EDR Contact: 08/03/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/13/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies TSCA: Toxic Substances Control Act Toxic Substances Control Act. TSCA identifies manufacturers and importers of chemical substances included on the TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory list. It includes data on the production volume of these substances by plant site. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/14/2022 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/24/2023 Number of Days to Update: 283 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-260-5521 Last EDR Contact: 09/15/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/25/2023 Data Release Frequency: Every 4 Years TRIS: Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System Toxic Release Inventory System. TRIS identifies facilities which release toxic chemicals to the air, water and land in reportable quantities under SARA Title III Section 313. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/16/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/02/2023 Number of Days to Update: 75 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-0250 Last EDR Contact: 08/18/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/27/2023 Data Release Frequency: Annually SSTS: Section 7 Tracking Systems Section 7 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, as amended (92 Stat. 829) requires all registered pesticide-producing establishments to submit a report to the Environmental Protection Agency by March 1st each year. Each establishment must report the types and amounts of pesticides, active ingredients and devices being produced, and those having been produced and sold or distributed in the past year. Date of Government Version: 04/17/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/18/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/10/2023 Number of Days to Update: 83 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4203 Last EDR Contact: 07/18/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/30/2023 Data Release Frequency: Annually TC07449983.2r Page GR-20 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 766 ROD: Records Of Decision Record of Decision. ROD documents mandate a permanent remedy at an NPL (Superfund) site containing technical and health information to aid in the cleanup. Date of Government Version: 06/22/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/06/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/24/2023 Number of Days to Update: 18 Source: EPA Telephone: 703-416-0223 Last EDR Contact: 09/01/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/11/2023 Data Release Frequency: Annually RMP: Risk Management Plans When Congress passed the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, it required EPA to publish regulations and guidance for chemical accident prevention at facilities using extremely hazardous substances. The Risk Management Program Rule (RMP Rule) was written to implement Section 112(r) of these amendments. The rule, which built upon existing industry codes and standards, requires companies of all sizes that use certain flammable and toxic substances to develop a Risk Management Program, which includes a(n): Hazard assessment that details the potential effects of an accidental release, an accident history of the last five years, and an evaluation of worst-case and alternative accidental releases; Prevention program that includes safety precautions and maintenance, monitoring, and employee training measures; and Emergency response program that spells out emergency health care, employee training measures and procedures for informing the public and response agencies (e.g the fire department) should an accident occur. Date of Government Version: 04/27/2022 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/04/2022 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/10/2022 Number of Days to Update: 6 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-8600 Last EDR Contact: 06/12/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/30/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies RAATS: RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System RCRA Administration Action Tracking System. RAATS contains records based on enforcement actions issued under RCRA pertaining to major violators and includes administrative and civil actions brought by the EPA. For administration actions after September 30, 1995, data entry in the RAATS database was discontinued. EPA will retain a copy of the database for historical records. It was necessary to terminate RAATS because a decrease in agency resources made it impossible to continue to update the information contained in the database. Date of Government Version: 04/17/1995 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/03/1995 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/07/1995 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4104 Last EDR Contact: 06/02/2008 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/01/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned PRP: Potentially Responsible Parties A listing of verified Potentially Responsible Parties Date of Government Version: 06/22/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/06/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/24/2023 Number of Days to Update: 18 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-6023 Last EDR Contact: 09/01/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/13/2023 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PADS: PCB Activity Database System PCB Activity Database. PADS Identifies generators, transporters, commercial storers and/or brokers and disposers of PCB’s who are required to notify the EPA of such activities. Date of Government Version: 03/20/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/04/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/09/2023 Number of Days to Update: 66 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-0500 Last EDR Contact: 07/07/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/16/2023 Data Release Frequency: Annually TC07449983.2r Page GR-21 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 767 ICIS: Integrated Compliance Information System The Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) supports the information needs of the national enforcement and compliance program as well as the unique needs of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program. Date of Government Version: 11/18/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/23/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2017 Number of Days to Update: 79 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2501 Last EDR Contact: 06/27/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/16/2023 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FTTS: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) FTTS tracks administrative cases and pesticide enforcement actions and compliance activities related to FIFRA, TSCA and EPCRA (Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act). To maintain currency, EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis. Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009 Number of Days to Update: 25 Source: EPA/Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances Telephone: 202-566-1667 Last EDR Contact: 08/18/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned FTTS INSP: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) A listing of FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) inspections and enforcements. Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009 Number of Days to Update: 25 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-1667 Last EDR Contact: 08/18/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned MLTS: Material Licensing Tracking System MLTS is maintained by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and contains a list of approximately 8,100 sites which possess or use radioactive materials and which are subject to NRC licensing requirements. To maintain currency, EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis. Date of Government Version: 03/15/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/21/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/30/2023 Number of Days to Update: 70 Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission Telephone: 301-415-7169 Last EDR Contact: 07/12/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/30/2023 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly COAL ASH DOE: Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data A listing of power plants that store ash in surface ponds. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/14/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/10/2023 Number of Days to Update: 87 Source: Department of Energy Telephone: 202-586-8719 Last EDR Contact: 09/01/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/11/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies COAL ASH EPA: Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List A listing of coal combustion residues surface impoundments with high hazard potential ratings. Date of Government Version: 01/12/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/05/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/11/2019 Number of Days to Update: 251 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 08/28/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/11/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC07449983.2r Page GR-22 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 768 PCB TRANSFORMER: PCB Transformer Registration Database The database of PCB transformer registrations that includes all PCB registration submittals. Date of Government Version: 09/13/2019 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/06/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2020 Number of Days to Update: 96 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-0517 Last EDR Contact: 08/03/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/13/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies RADINFO: Radiation Information Database The Radiation Information Database (RADINFO) contains information about facilities that are regulated by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations for radiation and radioactivity. Date of Government Version: 07/01/2019 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/23/2019 Number of Days to Update: 84 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-343-9775 Last EDR Contact: 06/22/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/09/2023 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly HIST FTTS: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing A complete administrative case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated. Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2501 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2007 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned HIST FTTS INSP: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Inspection & Enforcement Case Listing A complete inspection and enforcement case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated. Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2501 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2008 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned DOT OPS: Incident and Accident Data Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Incident and Accident data. Date of Government Version: 01/02/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/28/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/17/2020 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Telephone: 202-366-4595 Last EDR Contact: 07/25/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/06/2023 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly CONSENT: Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees Major legal settlements that establish responsibility and standards for cleanup at NPL (Superfund) sites. Released periodically by United States District Courts after settlement by parties to litigation matters. TC07449983.2r Page GR-23 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 769 Date of Government Version: 03/31/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/20/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/10/2023 Number of Days to Update: 81 Source: Department of Justice, Consent Decree Library Telephone: Varies Last EDR Contact: 06/27/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/16/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies BRS: Biennial Reporting System The Biennial Reporting System is a national system administered by the EPA that collects data on the generation and management of hazardous waste. BRS captures detailed data from two groups: Large Quantity Generators (LQG) and Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/09/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/20/2023 Number of Days to Update: 11 Source: EPA/NTIS Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 07/31/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/02/2023 Data Release Frequency: Biennially INDIAN RESERV: Indian Reservations This map layer portrays Indian administered lands of the United States that have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/14/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2017 Number of Days to Update: 546 Source: USGS Telephone: 202-208-3710 Last EDR Contact: 07/05/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/16/2023 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually FUSRAP: Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program DOE established the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) in 1974 to remediate sites where radioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) operations. Date of Government Version: 03/03/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/03/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/09/2023 Number of Days to Update: 98 Source: Department of Energy Telephone: 202-586-3559 Last EDR Contact: 07/26/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/13/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies UMTRA: Uranium Mill Tailings Sites Uranium ore was mined by private companies for federal government use in national defense programs. When the mills shut down, large piles of the sand-like material (mill tailings) remain after uranium has been extracted from the ore. Levels of human exposure to radioactive materials from the piles are low; however, in some cases tailings were used as construction materials before the potential health hazards of the tailings were recognized. Date of Government Version: 08/30/2019 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/28/2020 Number of Days to Update: 74 Source: Department of Energy Telephone: 505-845-0011 Last EDR Contact: 08/10/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/27/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies LEAD SMELTER 1: Lead Smelter Sites A listing of former lead smelter site locations. Date of Government Version: 06/22/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/06/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/24/2023 Number of Days to Update: 18 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-8787 Last EDR Contact: 09/01/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/09/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies LEAD SMELTER 2: Lead Smelter Sites A list of several hundred sites in the U.S. where secondary lead smelting was done from 1931and 1964. These sites may pose a threat to public health through ingestion or inhalation of contaminated soil or dust TC07449983.2r Page GR-24 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 770 Date of Government Version: 04/05/2001 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/27/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/02/2010 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: American Journal of Public Health Telephone: 703-305-6451 Last EDR Contact: 12/02/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned US AIRS (AFS): Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem (AFS) The database is a sub-system of Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS). AFS contains compliance data on air pollution point sources regulated by the U.S. EPA and/or state and local air regulatory agencies. This information comes from source reports by various stationary sources of air pollution, such as electric power plants, steel mills, factories, and universities, and provides information about the air pollutants they produce. Action, air program, air program pollutant, and general level plant data. It is used to track emissions and compliance data from industrial plants. Date of Government Version: 10/12/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/03/2017 Number of Days to Update: 100 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-2496 Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/08/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually US AIRS MINOR: Air Facility System Data A listing of minor source facilities. Date of Government Version: 10/12/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/03/2017 Number of Days to Update: 100 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-2496 Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/08/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually MINES VIOLATIONS: MSHA Violation Assessment Data Mines violation and assessment information. Department of Labor, Mine Safety & Health Administration. Date of Government Version: 04/03/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/04/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/09/2023 Number of Days to Update: 66 Source: DOL, Mine Safety & Health Admi Telephone: 202-693-9424 Last EDR Contact: 07/05/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/20/2023 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly US MINES: Mines Master Index File Contains all mine identification numbers issued for mines active or opened since 1971. The data also includes violation information. Date of Government Version: 05/01/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/24/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/24/2023 Number of Days to Update: 61 Source: Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration Telephone: 303-231-5959 Last EDR Contact: 08/22/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2023 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually US MINES 2: Ferrous and Nonferrous Metal Mines Database Listing This map layer includes ferrous (ferrous metal mines are facilities that extract ferrous metals, such as iron ore or molybdenum) and nonferrous (Nonferrous metal mines are facilities that extract nonferrous metals, such as gold, silver, copper, zinc, and lead) metal mines in the United States. Date of Government Version: 01/07/2022 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/24/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/17/2023 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: USGS Telephone: 703-648-7709 Last EDR Contact: 08/24/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC07449983.2r Page GR-25 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 771 US MINES 3: Active Mines & Mineral Plants Database Listing Active Mines and Mineral Processing Plant operations for commodities monitored by the Minerals Information Team of the USGS. Date of Government Version: 04/14/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/08/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/13/2011 Number of Days to Update: 97 Source: USGS Telephone: 703-648-7709 Last EDR Contact: 08/24/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies ABANDONED MINES: Abandoned Mines An inventory of land and water impacted by past mining (primarily coal mining) is maintained by OSMRE to provide information needed to implement the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA). The inventory contains information on the location, type, and extent of AML impacts, as well as, information on the cost associated with the reclamation of those problems. The inventory is based upon field surveys by State, Tribal, and OSMRE program officials. It is dynamic to the extent that it is modified as new problems are identified and existing problems are reclaimed. Date of Government Version: 06/13/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/14/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/14/2023 Number of Days to Update: 61 Source: Department of Interior Telephone: 202-208-2609 Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/18/2023 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FINDS: Facility Index System/Facility Registry System Facility Index System. FINDS contains both facility information and ’pointers’ to other sources that contain more detail. EDR includes the following FINDS databases in this report: PCS (Permit Compliance System), AIRS (Aerometric Information Retrieval System), DOCKET (Enforcement Docket used to manage and track information on civil judicial enforcement cases for all environmental statutes), FURS (Federal Underground Injection Control), C-DOCKET (Criminal Docket System used to track criminal enforcement actions for all environmental statutes), FFIS (Federal Facilities Information System), STATE (State Environmental Laws and Statutes), and PADS (PCB Activity Data System). Date of Government Version: 05/04/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/25/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/24/2023 Number of Days to Update: 60 Source: EPA Telephone: (415) 947-8000 Last EDR Contact: 08/29/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/11/2023 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly UXO: Unexploded Ordnance Sites A listing of unexploded ordnance site locations Date of Government Version: 11/09/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/20/2022 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2023 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: Department of Defense Telephone: 703-704-1564 Last EDR Contact: 07/06/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/23/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies ECHO: Enforcement & Compliance History Information ECHO provides integrated compliance and enforcement information for about 800,000 regulated facilities nationwide. Date of Government Version: 03/25/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/31/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/09/2023 Number of Days to Update: 70 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2280 Last EDR Contact: 06/29/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/16/2023 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly DOCKET HWC: Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing A complete list of the Federal Agency Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Facilities. TC07449983.2r Page GR-26 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 772 Date of Government Version: 05/06/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/21/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/11/2021 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-0527 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies FUELS PROGRAM: EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing This listing includes facilities that are registered under the Part 80 (Code of Federal Regulations) EPA Fuels Programs. All companies now are required to submit new and updated registrations. Date of Government Version: 05/15/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/17/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/10/2023 Number of Days to Update: 54 Source: EPA Telephone: 800-385-6164 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/27/2023 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PFAS NPL: Superfund Sites with PFAS Detections Information EPA’s Office of Land and Emergency Management and EPA Regional Offices maintain data describing what is known about site investigations, contamination, and remedial actions under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) where PFAS is present in the environment. Date of Government Version: 06/07/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/08/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/09/2023 Number of Days to Update: 1 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-8895 Last EDR Contact: 07/05/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/16/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies PFAS FEDERAL SITES: Federal Sites PFAS Information Several federal entities, such as the federal Superfund program, Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Transportation, and Department of Energy provided information for sites with known or suspected detections at federal facilities. Date of Government Version: 03/30/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/30/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/07/2023 Number of Days to Update: 8 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-272-0167 Last EDR Contact: 07/05/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/16/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies PFAS TSCA: PFAS Manufacture and Imports Information EPA issued the Chemical Data Reporting (CDR) Rule under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) and requires chemical manufacturers and facilities that manufacture or import chemical substances to report data to EPA. EPA publishes non-confidential business information (non-CBI) and includes descriptive information about each site, corporate parent, production volume, other manufacturing information, and processing and use information. Date of Government Version: 03/30/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/30/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/09/2023 Number of Days to Update: 71 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-272-0167 Last EDR Contact: 07/05/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/16/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies PFAS RCRA MANIFEST: PFAS Transfers Identified In the RCRA Database Listing To work around the lack of PFAS waste codes in the RCRA database, EPA developed the PFAS Transfers dataset by mining e-Manifest records containing at least one of these common PFAS keywords: PFAS, PFOA, PFOS, PERFL, AFFF, GENX, GEN-X (plus the VT waste codes). These keywords were searched for in the following text fields: Manifest handling instructions (MANIFEST_HANDLING_INSTR), Non-hazardous waste description (NON_HAZ_WASTE_DESCRIPTION), DOT printed information (DOT_PRINTED_INFORMATION), Waste line handling instructions (WASTE_LINE_HANDLING_INSTR), Waste residue comments (WASTE_RESIDUE_COMMENTS). Date of Government Version: 03/30/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/30/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/02/2023 Number of Days to Update: 33 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-272-0167 Last EDR Contact: 07/05/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/16/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC07449983.2r Page GR-27 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 773 PFAS ATSDR: PFAS Contamination Site Location Listing PFAS contamination site locations from the Department of Health & Human Services, Center for Disease Control & Prevention. ATSDR is involved at a number of PFAS-related sites, either directly or through assisting state and federal partners. As of now, most sites are related to drinking water contamination connected with PFAS production facilities or fire training areas where aqueous film-forming firefighting foam (AFFF) was regularly used. Date of Government Version: 06/24/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/17/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/08/2022 Number of Days to Update: 601 Source: Department of Health & Human Services Telephone: 202-741-5770 Last EDR Contact: 07/19/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/06/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies PFAS WQP: Ambient Environmental Sampling for PFAS The Water Quality Portal (WQP) is a part of a modernized repository storing ambient sampling data for all environmental media and tissue samples. A wide range of federal, state, tribal and local governments, academic and non-governmental organizations and individuals submit project details and sampling results to this public repository. The information is commonly used for research and assessments of environmental quality. Date of Government Version: 03/30/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/30/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/02/2023 Number of Days to Update: 33 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-272-0167 Last EDR Contact: 07/05/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/16/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies PFAS NPDES: Clean Water Act Discharge Monitoring Information Any discharger of pollutants to waters of the United States from a point source must have a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The process for obtaining limits involves the regulated entity (permittee) disclosing releases in a NPDES permit application and the permitting authority (typically the state but sometimes EPA) deciding whether to require monitoring or monitoring with limits. Caveats and Limitations: Less than half of states have required PFAS monitoring for at least one of their permittees and fewer states have established PFAS effluent limits for permittees. New rulemakings have been initiated that may increase the number of facilities monitoring for PFAS in the future. Date of Government Version: 03/30/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/30/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/07/2023 Number of Days to Update: 8 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-272-0167 Last EDR Contact: 07/05/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/16/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies PFAS ECHO: Facilities in Industries that May Be Handling PFAS Listing Regulators and the public have expressed interest in knowing which regulated entities may be using PFAS. EPA has developed a dataset from various sources that show which industries may be handling PFAS. Approximately 120,000 facilities subject to federal environmental programs have operated or currently operate in industry sectors with processes that may involve handling and/or release of PFAS. Date of Government Version: 03/30/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/30/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/03/2023 Number of Days to Update: 4 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-272-0167 Last EDR Contact: 07/05/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/16/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies PFAS ECHO FIRE TRAINING: Facilities in Industries that May Be Handling PFAS Listing A list of fire training sites was added to the Industry Sectors dataset using a keyword search on the permitted facilitys name to identify sites where fire-fighting foam may have been used in training exercises. Additionally, you may view an example spreadsheet of the subset of fire training facility data, as well as the keywords used in selecting or deselecting a facility for the subset. as well as the keywords used in selecting or deselecting a facility for the subset. These keywords were tested to maximize accuracy in selecting facilities that may use fire-fighting foam in training exercises, however, due to the lack of a required reporting field in the data systems for designating fire training sites, this methodology may not identify all fire training sites or may potentially misidentify them. TC07449983.2r Page GR-28 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 774 Date of Government Version: 03/30/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/30/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/03/2023 Number of Days to Update: 4 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-272-0167 Last EDR Contact: 07/05/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/16/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies PFAS PART 139 AIRPORT: All Certified Part 139 Airports PFAS Information Listing Since July 1, 2006, all certified part 139 airports are required to have fire-fighting foam onsite that meet military specifications (MIL-F-24385) (14 CFR 139.317). To date, these military specification fire-fighting foams are fluorinated and have been historically used for training and extinguishing. The 2018 FAA Reauthorization Act has a provision stating that no later than October 2021, FAA shall not require the use of fluorinated AFFF. This provision does not prohibit the use of fluorinated AFFF at Part 139 civilian airports; it only prohibits FAA from mandating its use. The Federal Aviation Administration?s document AC 150/5210-6D - Aircraft Fire Extinguishing Agents provides guidance on Aircraft Fire Extinguishing Agents, which includes Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF). Date of Government Version: 03/30/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/30/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/03/2023 Number of Days to Update: 4 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-272-0167 Last EDR Contact: 07/05/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/16/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies AQUEOUS FOAM NRC: Aqueous Foam Related Incidents Listing The National Response Center (NRC) serves as an emergency call center that fields initial reports for pollution and railroad incidents and forwards that information to appropriate federal/state agencies for response. The spreadsheets posted to the NRC website contain initial incident data that has not been validated or investigated by a federal/state response agency. Response center calls from 1990 to the most recent complete calendar year where there was indication of Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF) usage are included in this dataset. NRC calls may reference AFFF usage in the ?Material Involved? or ?Incident Description? fields. Date of Government Version: 04/27/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/27/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/02/2023 Number of Days to Update: 5 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-272-0167 Last EDR Contact: 07/06/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/16/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies PFAS: PFAS Contamination Site Location Listing A listing of PFAS contaminated sites included in the GeoTracker database. Date of Government Version: 06/02/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/02/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/23/2023 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 09/06/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/18/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies AQUEOUS FOAM: Former Fire Training Facility Assessments Listing Airports shown on this list are those believed to use Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF), and certified by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) under Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 139 (14 CFR Part 139). This list was created by SWRCB using information available from the FAA. Location points shown are from the latitude and longitude listed on the FAA airport master record. Date of Government Version: 06/02/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/02/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/23/2023 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-341-5455 Last EDR Contact: 09/06/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/18/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies CA BOND EXP. PLAN: Bond Expenditure Plan Department of Health Services developed a site-specific expenditure plan as the basis for an appropriation of Hazardous Substance Cleanup Bond Act funds. It is not updated. TC07449983.2r Page GR-29 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 775 Date of Government Version: 01/01/1989 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/27/1994 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/02/1994 Number of Days to Update: 6 Source: Department of Health Services Telephone: 916-255-2118 Last EDR Contact: 05/31/1994 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned CORTESE: "Cortese" Hazardous Waste & Substances Sites List The sites for the list are designated by the State Water Resource Control Board (LUST), the Integrated Waste Board (SWF/LS), and the Department of Toxic Substances Control (Cal-Sites). Date of Government Version: 06/14/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/14/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/06/2023 Number of Days to Update: 84 Source: CAL EPA/Office of Emergency Information Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 06/14/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/02/2023 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly CUPA LIVERMORE-PLEASANTON: CUPA Facility Listing list of facilities associated with the various CUPA programs in Livermore-Pleasanton Date of Government Version: 03/31/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/08/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/31/2023 Number of Days to Update: 84 Source: Livermore-Pleasanton Fire Department Telephone: 925-454-2361 Last EDR Contact: 08/10/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/20/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies DRYCLEAN SACRAMENTO METO DIST: Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management DistrictDrycleaner Facility Listing A listing of drycleaner facility locations, for the Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District. Date of Government Version: 04/25/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/28/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/19/2023 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District Telephone: 916-874-3958 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/11/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies DRYCLEANERS: Cleaner Facilities A list of drycleaner related facilities that have EPA ID numbers. These are facilities with certain SIC codes: power laundries, family and commercial; garment pressing and cleaner’s agents; linen supply; coin-operated laundries and cleaning; drycleaning plants, except rugs; carpet and upholster cleaning; industrial launderers; laundry and garment services. Date of Government Version: 08/27/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/01/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/19/2021 Number of Days to Update: 79 Source: Department of Toxic Substance Control Telephone: 916-327-4498 Last EDR Contact: 08/22/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/11/2023 Data Release Frequency: Annually DRYCLEAN FEATHER RIVER DIST: Feather River Air Quality Management District Drycleaner Facility Listing A listing of drycleaner facility locations, for the Feather River Air Quality Management District. Date of Government Version: 03/08/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/09/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/05/2023 Number of Days to Update: 88 Source: Feather River Air Quality Management District Telephone: 530-634-7659 Last EDR Contact: 06/08/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/11/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies DRYCLEAN SAN DIEGO CO DIST: San Diego County Air Pollution Control District Drycleaner Facility Listing A listing of drycleaner facility locations, for the San Diego County Air Pollution Control District. Date of Government Version: 02/01/2019 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/01/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/01/2023 Number of Days to Update: 1461 Source: San Diego County Air Pollution Control District Telephone: 858-586-2616 Last EDR Contact: 08/08/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/11/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC07449983.2r Page GR-30 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 776 DRYCLEAN SAN JOAQ VAL DIST: San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District District Drycleaner Facility Listing A listing of drycleaner facility locations, for the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District. Date of Government Version: 05/24/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/30/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/21/2023 Number of Days to Update: 83 Source: San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District Telephone: 559-230-6001 Last EDR Contact: 05/11/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/11/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies DRYCLEAN EAST KERN DIST: Eastern Kern Air Pollution Control District District Drycleaner Facility Listing A listing of drycleaner facility locations, for the Eastern Kern Air Pollution Control District. Date of Government Version: 01/12/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/26/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2023 Number of Days to Update: 79 Source: Eastern Kern Air Pollution Control District Telephone: 661-862-9684 Last EDR Contact: 04/25/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/11/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies DRYCLEAN IMPERIAL CO DIST: Imperial County Air Pollution Control District Drycleaner Facility Listing A listing of drycleaner facility locations, for the Imperial County Air Pollution Control District Date of Government Version: 04/25/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/26/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2023 Number of Days to Update: 79 Source: Imperial County Air Pollution Control District Telephone: 442-265-1800 Last EDR Contact: 04/25/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/11/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies DRYCLEAN MENDO CO DIST: Mendocino County Air Quality Management District Drycleaner Facility Listing A listing of drycleaner facility locations, for the Mendocino County Air Quality Management District. Date of Government Version: 04/27/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/28/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2023 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: Mendocino County Air Quality Management District Telephone: 707-463-4354 Last EDR Contact: 04/25/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/11/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies DRYCLEAN MOJAVE DESERT DIST: Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District Drycleaner Facility Listing A listing of drycleaner facility locations, for the Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District. Date of Government Version: 04/26/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/27/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2023 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District Telephone: 760-245-1661 Last EDR Contact: 04/25/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/11/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies DRYCLEAN MONTEREY BAY DIST: Monterey Bay Air Quality Management District Drycleaner Facility Listing A listing of drycleaner facility locations, for the Monterey Bay Air Quality Management District. Date of Government Version: 04/25/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/26/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2023 Number of Days to Update: 79 Source: Monterey Bay Air Quality Management District Telephone: 831-647-9411 Last EDR Contact: 04/25/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/11/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies DRYCLEAN SHASTA CO DIST: Shasta County Air Quality Management District District Drycleaner Facility Listing A listing of drycleaner facility locations, for the Shasta County Air Quality Management District. Date of Government Version: 04/26/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/27/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2023 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: Shasta County Air Quality Management District Telephone: 530-225-5674 Last EDR Contact: 04/25/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/11/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC07449983.2r Page GR-31 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 777 DRYCLEAN YOLO-SOLANO DIST: Yolo-Solano Air Quality Management District Drycleaner Facility Listing A listing of drycleaner facility locations, for the Yolo-Solano Air Quality Management District. Date of Government Version: 04/25/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/27/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2023 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: Yolo-Solano Air Quality Management District Telephone: 530-757-3650 Last EDR Contact: 04/25/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/11/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies DRYCLEAN AVAQMD: Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District Drycleaner Listing A listing of dry cleaners in the Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District. Date of Government Version: 05/22/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/24/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/14/2023 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District Telephone: 661-723-8070 Last EDR Contact: 08/22/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/11/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies DRYCLEAN PLACER CO DIST: Placer County Air Quality Management District Drycleaner Facility Listing A listing of drycleaner facility locations, for the Placer County Air Quality Management District. Date of Government Version: 05/15/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/17/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/14/2023 Number of Days to Update: 89 Source: Placer County Air Quality Management District Telephone: 530-745-2335 Last EDR Contact: 05/11/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/11/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies DRYCLEAN BAY AREA DIST: Bay Area Air Quality Management District Drycleaner Facility Listing Bay Area Air Quality Management District Drycleaner Facility Listing. Date of Government Version: 02/20/2019 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/30/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/01/2023 Number of Days to Update: 1432 Source: Bay Area Air Quality Management District Telephone: 415-516-1916 Last EDR Contact: 07/25/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/11/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies DRYCLEAN BUTTE CO DIST: Butte County Air Quality Management DistrictDrycleaner Facility Listing Butte County Air Quality Management DistrictDrycleaner Facility Listing. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/23/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/01/2023 Number of Days to Update: 1469 Source: Butte County Air Quality Management District Telephone: 530-332-9400 Last EDR Contact: 07/13/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/11/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies DRYCLEAN CALAVERAS CO DIST: Calaveras County Environmental Management Agency Drycleaner Facility Listing A listing of drycleaner facility locations, for the Calaveras County Environmental Management Agency. Date of Government Version: 06/17/2019 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/19/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/01/2023 Number of Days to Update: 1412 Source: Calaveras County Environmental Management Agency Telephone: 209-754-6399 Last EDR Contact: 04/24/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/16/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies DRYCLEAN GRANT: Grant Recipients List Assembly Bill 998 (AB 998) established the Non-Toxic Dry Cleaning Incentive Program to provide financial assistance to the dry cleaning industry to switch from systems using perchloroethylene (Perc), an identified toxic air contaminant and potential human carcinogen, to non-toxic and non-smog forming alternatives. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/04/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/01/2023 Number of Days to Update: 816 Source: California Air Resources Board Telephone: 916-323-0006 Last EDR Contact: 07/24/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/06/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC07449983.2r Page GR-32 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 778 DRYCLEAN LAKE CO DIST: Lake County Air Quality Management District Drycleaner Facility Listing A listing of drycleaner facility locations, for the Lake County Air Quality Management District, Date of Government Version: 04/29/2019 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/07/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/01/2023 Number of Days to Update: 1455 Source: Lake County Air Quality Management District Telephone: 707-263-7000 Last EDR Contact: 05/11/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/11/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies DRYCLEAN NO COAST UNIFIED DIST: North Coast Unified Air Quality Management District Drycleaner Facility Listing A listing of drycleaner facility locations, for the North Coast Unified Air Quality Management District. Date of Government Version: 11/30/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/19/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/01/2023 Number of Days to Update: 1473 Source: North Coast Unified Air Quality Management District Telephone: 707-443-3093 Last EDR Contact: 04/25/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/11/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies DRYCLEAN NO SIERRA DIST: Northern Sierra Air Quality Management District Drycleaner Facility Listing A listing of drycleaner facility locations, for the Northern Sierra Air Quality Management District, Date of Government Version: 05/07/2019 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/07/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/01/2023 Number of Days to Update: 1455 Source: Northern Sierra Air Quality Management District Telephone: 530-274-9350 Last EDR Contact: 04/25/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/11/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies DRYCLEAN NO SONOMA CO DIST: Norther Sonoma County County Air Pollution Control District Drycleaner Facility Listing A listing of drycleaner facility locations, for the Northern Sonoma County Air Pollution Control District., Date of Government Version: 04/17/2019 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/17/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/01/2023 Number of Days to Update: 1475 Source: Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District Telephone: 707-433-5911 Last EDR Contact: 04/25/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/11/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies DRYCLEAN SANTA BARB CO DIST: Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District Drycleaner Facility Listing A listing of drycleaner facility locations, for the Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District. Date of Government Version: 02/19/2019 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/17/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/01/2023 Number of Days to Update: 1475 Source: Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District Telephone: 805-961-8867 Last EDR Contact: 04/25/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/11/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies DRYCLEAN SAN LUIS OB CO DIST: San Luis Obispo County Air Pollution Control District Drycleaner Facility Listing A listing of drycleaner facility locations, for the San Luis Obispo County Air Pollution Control District. Date of Government Version: 04/23/2019 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/25/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/01/2023 Number of Days to Update: 1467 Source: San Luis Obispo County Air Pollution Control District Telephone: 805-781-5756 Last EDR Contact: 07/25/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/11/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies DRYCLEAN TEHAMA CO DIST: Tehama County Air Pollution Control District Drycleaner Facility Listing A listing of drycleaner facility locations, for the Tehama County Air Pollution Control District. Date of Government Version: 04/24/2019 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/24/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/01/2023 Number of Days to Update: 1468 Source: Tehama County Air Pollution Control District Telephone: 530-527-3717 Last EDR Contact: 04/25/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/11/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC07449983.2r Page GR-33 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 779 DRYCLEAN VENTURA CO DIST: Drycleaner Facility Listing A listing of drycleaner facility locations, for the Ventura County Air Pollution Control District. Date of Government Version: 04/16/2019 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/17/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/01/2023 Number of Days to Update: 1475 Source: Ventura County Air Pollution Control District Telephone: 805-645-1421 Last EDR Contact: 07/25/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/11/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies DRYCLEAN SOUTH COAST: South Coast Air Quality Management District Drycleaner Listing A listing of dry cleaners in the South Coast Air Quality Management District Date of Government Version: 05/17/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/09/2023 Number of Days to Update: 83 Source: South Coast Air Quality Management District Telephone: 909-396-3211 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies DRYCLEAN AMADOR: Amador Air District Drycleaner Facility Listing A listing of drycleaner facility locations, for the Amador Air Quality Management District Date of Government Version: 04/26/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/27/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/13/2023 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: Amador Air Quality Management District Telephone: 209-257-0112 Last EDR Contact: 04/24/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/11/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies DRYCLEAN GLENN CO DIST: Glenn County Air Pollution Control District Drycleaner Facility Listing A listing of drycleaner facility locations, for the Glenn County Air Pollution Control District. Date of Government Version: 05/02/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/03/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/25/2023 Number of Days to Update: 83 Source: Glenn County Air Pollution Control District Telephone: 530-934-6500 Last EDR Contact: 05/03/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/11/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies EMI: Emissions Inventory Data Toxics and criteria pollutant emissions data collected by the ARB and local air pollution agencies. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/09/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/30/2023 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: California Air Resources Board Telephone: 916-322-2990 Last EDR Contact: 09/15/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/25/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies ENF: Enforcement Action Listing A listing of Water Board Enforcement Actions. Formal is everything except Oral/Verbal Communication, Notice of Violation, Expedited Payment Letter, and Staff Enforcement Letter. Date of Government Version: 04/17/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/18/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/06/2023 Number of Days to Update: 79 Source: State Water Resoruces Control Board Telephone: 916-445-9379 Last EDR Contact: 07/18/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/30/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies Financial Assurance 1: Financial Assurance Information Listing Financial Assurance information Date of Government Version: 01/11/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/17/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/04/2023 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-255-3628 Last EDR Contact: 09/13/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/30/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC07449983.2r Page GR-34 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 780 Financial Assurance 2: Financial Assurance Information Listing A listing of financial assurance information for solid waste facilities. Financial assurance is intended to ensure that resources are available to pay for the cost of closure, post-closure care, and corrective measures if the owner or operator of a regulated facility is unable or unwilling to pay. Date of Government Version: 05/04/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/25/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/16/2023 Number of Days to Update: 83 Source: California Integrated Waste Management Board Telephone: 916-341-6066 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/20/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies ICE: Inspection, Compliance and Enforcement Contains data pertaining to the Permitted Facilities with Inspections / Enforcements sites tracked in Envirostor. Date of Government Version: 05/15/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/16/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/09/2023 Number of Days to Update: 85 Source: Department of Toxic Subsances Control Telephone: 877-786-9427 Last EDR Contact: 08/14/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/27/2023 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly HIST CORTESE: Hazardous Waste & Substance Site List The sites for the list are designated by the State Water Resource Control Board [LUST], the Integrated Waste Board [SWF/LS], and the Department of Toxic Substances Control [CALSITES]. This listing is no longer updated by the state agency. Date of Government Version: 04/01/2001 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/22/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/08/2009 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 01/22/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned HWP: EnviroStor Permitted Facilities Listing Detailed information on permitted hazardous waste facilities and corrective action ("cleanups") tracked in EnviroStor. Date of Government Version: 05/15/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/16/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/09/2023 Number of Days to Update: 85 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 08/14/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/27/2023 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly HWT: Registered Hazardous Waste Transporter Database A listing of hazardous waste transporters. In California, unless specifically exempted, it is unlawful for any person to transport hazardous wastes unless the person holds a valid registration issued by DTSC. A hazardous waste transporter registration is valid for one year and is assigned a unique registration number. Date of Government Version: 06/29/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/29/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/19/2023 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-440-7145 Last EDR Contact: 06/29/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/16/2023 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly HAZNET: Facility and Manifest Data Facility and Manifest Data. The data is extracted from the copies of hazardous waste manifests received each year by the DTSC. The annual volume of manifests is typically 700,000 - 1,000,000 annually, representing approximately 350,000 - 500,000 shipments. Data are from the manifests submitted without correction, and therefore many contain some invalid values for data elements such as generator ID, TSD ID, waste category, and disposal method. This database begins with calendar year 1993. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/05/2022 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/19/2022 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: California Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 916-255-1136 Last EDR Contact: 07/07/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/16/2023 Data Release Frequency: Annually TC07449983.2r Page GR-35 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 781 MINES: Mines Site Location Listing A listing of mine site locations from the Office of Mine Reclamation. Date of Government Version: 06/02/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/02/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/23/2023 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: Department of Conservation Telephone: 916-322-1080 Last EDR Contact: 09/06/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/18/2023 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly MWMP: Medical Waste Management Program Listing The Medical Waste Management Program (MWMP) ensures the proper handling and disposal of medical waste by permitting and inspecting medical waste Offsite Treatment Facilities (PDF) and Transfer Stations (PDF) throughout the state. MWMP also oversees all Medical Waste Transporters. Date of Government Version: 05/08/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/25/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/16/2023 Number of Days to Update: 83 Source: Department of Public Health Telephone: 916-558-1784 Last EDR Contact: 08/29/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/11/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies NPDES: NPDES Permits Listing A listing of NPDES permits, including stormwater. Date of Government Version: 05/08/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/08/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/31/2023 Number of Days to Update: 84 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-445-9379 Last EDR Contact: 08/08/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/20/2023 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PEST LIC: Pesticide Regulation Licenses Listing A listing of licenses and certificates issued by the Department of Pesticide Regulation. The DPR issues licenses and/or certificates to: Persons and businesses that apply or sell pesticides; Pest control dealers and brokers; Persons who advise on agricultural pesticide applications. Date of Government Version: 05/25/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/25/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/16/2023 Number of Days to Update: 83 Source: Department of Pesticide Regulation Telephone: 916-445-4038 Last EDR Contact: 08/29/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/11/2023 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PROC: Certified Processors Database A listing of certified processors. Date of Government Version: 06/02/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/02/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/23/2023 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: Department of Conservation Telephone: 916-323-3836 Last EDR Contact: 09/06/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/18/2023 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly NOTIFY 65: Proposition 65 Records Listings of all Proposition 65 incidents reported to counties by the State Water Resources Control Board and the Regional Water Quality Control Board. This database is no longer updated by the reporting agency. Date of Government Version: 06/06/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/07/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/25/2023 Number of Days to Update: 79 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-445-3846 Last EDR Contact: 09/07/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/25/2023 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned TC07449983.2r Page GR-36 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 782 SAN JOSE HAZMAT: Hazardous Material Facilities Hazardous material facilities, including underground storage tank sites. Date of Government Version: 11/03/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/26/2021 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: City of San Jose Fire Department Telephone: 408-535-7694 Last EDR Contact: 07/26/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/13/2023 Data Release Frequency: Annually SANTA CRUZ CO SITE MITI: Site Mitigation Listing Sites may become contaminated with toxic chemicals through illegal dumping or disposal, from leaking underground storage tanks, or through industrial or commercial activities.The goal of the site mitigation program is to protect the public health and the environment while facilitating completion of contaminated site clean-up projects in a timely manner. Date of Government Version: 12/03/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/23/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/13/2023 Number of Days to Update: 20 Source: Santa Cruz Environmental Health Services Telephone: 831-454-2761 Last EDR Contact: 08/09/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/27/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies UIC: UIC Listing A listing of wells identified as underground injection wells, in the California Oil and Gas Wells database. Date of Government Version: 06/02/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/02/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/23/2023 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: Deaprtment of Conservation Telephone: 916-445-2408 Last EDR Contact: 09/06/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/18/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies UIC GEO: Underground Injection Control Sites (GEOTRACKER) Underground control injection sites Date of Government Version: 06/05/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/05/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/28/2023 Number of Days to Update: 84 Source: State Water Resource Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 09/06/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/18/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies WASTEWATER PITS: Oil Wastewater Pits Listing Water officials discovered that oil producers have been dumping chemical-laden wastewater into hundreds of unlined pits that are operating without proper permits. Inspections completed by the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board revealed the existence of previously unidentified waste sites. The water boards review found that more than one-third of the region’s active disposal pits are operating without permission. Date of Government Version: 02/11/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2021 Number of Days to Update: 90 Source: RWQCB, Central Valley Region Telephone: 559-445-5577 Last EDR Contact: 07/07/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/16/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies WDS: Waste Discharge System Sites which have been issued waste discharge requirements. Date of Government Version: 06/19/2007 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/20/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/29/2007 Number of Days to Update: 9 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-341-5227 Last EDR Contact: 08/09/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/27/2023 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned TC07449983.2r Page GR-37 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 783 WIP: Well Investigation Program Case List Well Investigation Program case in the San Gabriel and San Fernando Valley area. Date of Government Version: 07/03/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/21/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/03/2009 Number of Days to Update: 13 Source: Los Angeles Water Quality Control Board Telephone: 213-576-6726 Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/01/2024 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned MILITARY PRIV SITES: Military Privatized Sites (GEOTRACKER) Military privatized sites Date of Government Version: 06/05/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/05/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/28/2023 Number of Days to Update: 84 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 09/06/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/18/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies PROJECT: Project Sites (GEOTRACKER) Projects sites Date of Government Version: 06/05/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/05/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/28/2023 Number of Days to Update: 84 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 09/06/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/18/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies WDR: Waste Discharge Requirements Listing In general, the Waste Discharge Requirements (WDRs) Program (sometimes also referred to as the "Non Chapter 15 (Non 15) Program") regulates point discharges that are exempt pursuant to Subsection 20090 of Title 27 and not subject to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act. Exemptions from Title 27 may be granted for nine categories of discharges (e.g., sewage, wastewater, etc.) that meet, and continue to meet, the preconditions listed for each specific exemption. The scope of the WDRs Program also includes the discharge of wastes classified as inert, pursuant to section 20230 of Title 27. Date of Government Version: 06/02/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/02/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/23/2023 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-341-5810 Last EDR Contact: 09/06/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/18/2023 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly CIWQS: California Integrated Water Quality System The California Integrated Water Quality System (CIWQS) is a computer system used by the State and Regional Water Quality Control Boards to track information about places of environmental interest, manage permits and other orders, track inspections, and manage violations and enforcement activities. Date of Government Version: 05/25/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/25/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/14/2023 Number of Days to Update: 81 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-794-4977 Last EDR Contact: 08/29/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/11/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies CERS: CalEPA Regulated Site Portal Data The CalEPA Regulated Site Portal database combines data about environmentally regulated sites and facilities in California into a single database. It combines data from a variety of state and federal databases, and provides an overview of regulated activities across the spectrum of environmental programs for any given location in California. These activities include hazardous materials and waste, state and federal cleanups, impacted ground and surface waters, and toxic materials TC07449983.2r Page GR-38 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 784 Date of Government Version: 04/17/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/18/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/06/2023 Number of Days to Update: 79 Source: California Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 916-323-2514 Last EDR Contact: 07/18/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/30/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies NON-CASE INFO: Non-Case Information Sites (GEOTRACKER) Non-Case Information sites Date of Government Version: 06/05/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/05/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/28/2023 Number of Days to Update: 84 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 09/06/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/18/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies OTHER OIL GAS: Other Oil & Gas Projects Sites (GEOTRACKER) Other Oil & Gas Projects sites Date of Government Version: 06/05/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/05/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/28/2023 Number of Days to Update: 84 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 09/06/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/18/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies PROD WATER PONDS: Produced Water Ponds Sites (GEOTRACKER) Produced water ponds sites Date of Government Version: 06/05/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/05/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/28/2023 Number of Days to Update: 84 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 09/06/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/18/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies SAMPLING POINT: Sampling Point ? Public Sites (GEOTRACKER) Sampling point - public sites Date of Government Version: 06/05/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/05/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/28/2023 Number of Days to Update: 84 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 09/06/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/18/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies WELL STIM PROJ: Well Stimulation Project (GEOTRACKER) Includes areas of groundwater monitoring plans, a depiction of the monitoring network, and the facilities, boundaries, and subsurface characteristics of the oilfield and the features (oil and gas wells, produced water ponds, UIC wells, water supply wells, etc?) being monitored Date of Government Version: 06/05/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/05/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/28/2023 Number of Days to Update: 84 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 09/06/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/18/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies HWTS: Hazardous Waste Tracking System DTSC maintains the Hazardous Waste Tracking System that stores ID number information since the early 1980s and manifest data since 1993. The system collects both manifest copies from the generator and destination facility. Date of Government Version: 04/13/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/18/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/10/2023 Number of Days to Update: 83 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-324-2444 Last EDR Contact: 06/27/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/16/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC07449983.2r Page GR-39 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 785 PFAS TRIS: List of PFAS Added to the TRI Section 7321 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (NDAA) immediately added certain per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) to the list of chemicals covered by the Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) under Section 313 of the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA) and provided a framework for additional PFAS to be added to TRI on an annual basis. Date of Government Version: 06/07/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/08/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/09/2023 Number of Days to Update: 1 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-0250 Last EDR Contact: 07/05/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/16/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies PCS ENF: Enforcement data No description is available for this data Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/05/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/06/2015 Number of Days to Update: 29 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-2497 Last EDR Contact: 06/27/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/16/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies PCS: Permit Compliance System PCS is a computerized management information system that contains data on National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit holding facilities. PCS tracks the permit, compliance, and enforcement status of NPDES facilities. Date of Government Version: 07/14/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/05/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2011 Number of Days to Update: 55 Source: EPA, Office of Water Telephone: 202-564-2496 Last EDR Contact: 06/27/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/16/2023 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned BIOSOLIDS: ICIS-NPDES Biosolids Facility Data The data reflects compliance information about facilities in the biosolids program. Date of Government Version: 07/16/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/18/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/28/2023 Number of Days to Update: 41 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-4700 Last EDR Contact: 07/18/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/30/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies MINES MRDS: Mineral Resources Data System Mineral Resources Data System Date of Government Version: 08/23/2022 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/22/2022 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/28/2023 Number of Days to Update: 98 Source: USGS Telephone: 703-648-6533 Last EDR Contact: 08/24/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records EDR MGP: EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants The EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plant Database includes records of coal gas plants (manufactured gas plants) compiled by EDR’s researchers. Manufactured gas sites were used in the United States from the 1800’s to 1950’s to produce a gas that could be distributed and used as fuel. These plants used whale oil, rosin, coal, or a mixture of coal, oil, and water that also produced a significant amount of waste. Many of the byproducts of the gas production, such as coal tar (oily waste containing volatile and non-volatile chemicals), sludges, oils and other compounds are potentially hazardous to human health and the environment. The byproduct from this process was frequently disposed of directly at the plant site and can remain or spread slowly, serving as a continuous source of soil and groundwater contamination. TC07449983.2r Page GR-40 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 786 Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A Source: EDR, Inc. Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned EDR Hist Auto: EDR Exclusive Historical Auto Stations EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential gas station/filling station/service station sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR’s opinion, include gas station/filling station/service station establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to gas, gas station, gasoline station, filling station, auto, automobile repair, auto service station, service station, etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR’s HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A Source: EDR, Inc. Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies EDR Hist Cleaner: EDR Exclusive Historical Cleaners EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential dry cleaner sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR’s opinion, include dry cleaning establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to dry cleaners, cleaners, laundry, laundromat, cleaning/laundry, wash & dry etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR’s HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A Source: EDR, Inc. Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives RGA LF: Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List The EDR Recovered Government Archive Landfill database provides a list of landfills derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled from Records formerly available from the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery in California. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/13/2014 Number of Days to Update: 196 Source: Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies RGA LUST: Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank The EDR Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank database provides a list of LUST incidents derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled from Records formerly available from the State Water Resources Control Board in California. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/30/2013 Number of Days to Update: 182 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies TC07449983.2r Page GR-41 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 787 COUNTY RECORDS ALAMEDA COUNTY: CS ALAMEDA: Contaminated Sites A listing of contaminated sites overseen by the Toxic Release Program (oil and groundwater contamination from chemical releases and spills) and the Leaking Underground Storage Tank Program (soil and ground water contamination from leaking petroleum USTs). Date of Government Version: 01/09/2019 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/11/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/05/2019 Number of Days to Update: 53 Source: Alameda County Environmental Health Services Telephone: 510-567-6700 Last EDR Contact: 06/27/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/16/2023 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually UST ALAMEDA: Underground Tanks Underground storage tank sites located in Alameda county. Date of Government Version: 06/27/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/28/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/14/2023 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: Alameda County Environmental Health Services Telephone: 510-567-6700 Last EDR Contact: 06/27/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/16/2023 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually AMADOR COUNTY: CUPA AMADOR: CUPA Facility List Cupa Facility List Date of Government Version: 04/27/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/27/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/13/2023 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: Amador County Environmental Health Telephone: 209-223-6439 Last EDR Contact: 07/26/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/13/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies BUTTE COUNTY: CUPA BUTTE: CUPA Facility Listing Cupa facility list. Date of Government Version: 04/21/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/25/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/09/2017 Number of Days to Update: 106 Source: Public Health Department Telephone: 530-538-7149 Last EDR Contact: 06/27/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/16/2023 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned CALVERAS COUNTY: CUPA CALVERAS: CUPA Facility Listing Cupa Facility Listing Date of Government Version: 06/27/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/28/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/14/2023 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: Calveras County Environmental Health Telephone: 209-754-6399 Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/01/2024 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly COLUSA COUNTY: TC07449983.2r Page GR-42 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 788 CUPA COLUSA: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list. Date of Government Version: 04/06/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/23/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/10/2020 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: Health & Human Services Telephone: 530-458-0396 Last EDR Contact: 07/26/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/13/2023 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually CONTRA COSTA COUNTY: SL CONTRA COSTA: Site List List includes sites from the underground tank, hazardous waste generator and business plan/2185 programs. Date of Government Version: 04/03/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/20/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/10/2023 Number of Days to Update: 81 Source: Contra Costa Health Services Department Telephone: 925-646-2286 Last EDR Contact: 07/19/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/06/2023 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually DEL NORTE COUNTY: CUPA DEL NORTE: CUPA Facility List Cupa Facility list Date of Government Version: 05/10/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/10/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/31/2023 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: Del Norte County Environmental Health Division Telephone: 707-465-0426 Last EDR Contact: 08/02/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/06/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies EL DORADO COUNTY: CUPA EL DORADO: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility list. Date of Government Version: 08/08/2022 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/09/2022 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/01/2022 Number of Days to Update: 23 Source: El Dorado County Environmental Management Department Telephone: 530-621-6623 Last EDR Contact: 07/19/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/06/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies FRESNO COUNTY: CUPA FRESNO: CUPA Resources List Certified Unified Program Agency. CUPA’s are responsible for implementing a unified hazardous materials and hazardous waste management regulatory program. The agency provides oversight of businesses that deal with hazardous materials, operate underground storage tanks or aboveground storage tanks. Date of Government Version: 06/28/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/21/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/03/2022 Number of Days to Update: 72 Source: Dept. of Community Health Telephone: 559-445-3271 Last EDR Contact: 06/29/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/09/2023 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually GLENN COUNTY: TC07449983.2r Page GR-43 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 789 CUPA GLENN: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 01/22/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/24/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/14/2018 Number of Days to Update: 49 Source: Glenn County Air Pollution Control District Telephone: 830-934-6500 Last EDR Contact: 07/11/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/30/2023 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned HUMBOLDT COUNTY: CUPA HUMBOLDT: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility list. Date of Government Version: 08/12/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/12/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/08/2021 Number of Days to Update: 88 Source: Humboldt County Environmental Health Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 08/09/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/27/2023 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually IMPERIAL COUNTY: CUPA IMPERIAL: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list. Date of Government Version: 04/12/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/14/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/28/2023 Number of Days to Update: 75 Source: San Diego Border Field Office Telephone: 760-339-2777 Last EDR Contact: 07/11/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/30/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies INYO COUNTY: CUPA INYO: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list. Date of Government Version: 04/02/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/03/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/14/2018 Number of Days to Update: 72 Source: Inyo County Environmental Health Services Telephone: 760-878-0238 Last EDR Contact: 08/09/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/27/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies KERN COUNTY: CUPA KERN: CUPA Facility List A listing of sites included in the Kern County Hazardous Material Business Plan. Date of Government Version: 07/26/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/27/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/09/2023 Number of Days to Update: 13 Source: Kern County Public Health Telephone: 661-321-3000 Last EDR Contact: 07/26/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/13/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies UST KERN: Underground Storage Tank Sites & Tank Listing Kern County Sites and Tanks Listing. TC07449983.2r Page GR-44 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 790 Date of Government Version: 07/26/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/27/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/03/2023 Number of Days to Update: 7 Source: Kern County Environment Health Services Department Telephone: 661-862-8700 Last EDR Contact: 07/26/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/13/2023 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly KINGS COUNTY: CUPA KINGS: CUPA Facility List A listing of sites included in the county’s Certified Unified Program Agency database. California’s Secretary for Environmental Protection established the unified hazardous materials and hazardous waste regulatory program as required by chapter 6.11 of the California Health and Safety Code. The Unified Program consolidates the administration, permits, inspections, and enforcement activities. Date of Government Version: 12/03/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/26/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/14/2021 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: Kings County Department of Public Health Telephone: 559-584-1411 Last EDR Contact: 08/09/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/27/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies LAKE COUNTY: CUPA LAKE: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 04/26/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/27/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/31/2023 Number of Days to Update: 34 Source: Lake County Environmental Health Telephone: 707-263-1164 Last EDR Contact: 07/06/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/23/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies LASSEN COUNTY: CUPA LASSEN: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 07/31/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/21/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/09/2020 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: Lassen County Environmental Health Telephone: 530-251-8528 Last EDR Contact: 07/11/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/30/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies LOS ANGELES COUNTY: AOCONCERN: Key Areas of Concerns in Los Angeles County San Gabriel Valley areas where VOC contamination is at or above the MCL as designated by region 9 EPA office. Date of Government Version: 3/30/2009 Exide Site area is a cleanup plan of lead-impacted soil surrounding the former Exide Facility as designated by the DTSC. Date of Government Version: 7/17/2017 Date of Government Version: 03/30/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/31/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/23/2009 Number of Days to Update: 206 Source: N/A Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 09/07/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/25/2023 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned TC07449983.2r Page GR-45 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 791 HMS LOS ANGELES: HMS: Street Number List Industrial Waste and Underground Storage Tank Sites. Date of Government Version: 06/21/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/28/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/14/2023 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: Department of Public Works Telephone: 626-458-3517 Last EDR Contact: 06/27/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/16/2023 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually LF LOS ANGELES: List of Solid Waste Facilities Solid Waste Facilities in Los Angeles County. Date of Government Version: 04/10/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/11/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/26/2023 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: La County Department of Public Works Telephone: 818-458-5185 Last EDR Contact: 07/10/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/23/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies LF LOS ANGELES CITY: City of Los Angeles Landfills Landfills owned and maintained by the City of Los Angeles. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2022 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/12/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/29/2023 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: Engineering & Construction Division Telephone: 213-473-7869 Last EDR Contact: 07/06/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/23/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies LOS ANGELES AST: Active & Inactive AST Inventory A listing of active & inactive above ground petroleum storage tank site locations, located in the City of Los Angeles. Date of Government Version: 06/01/2019 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/25/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/22/2019 Number of Days to Update: 58 Source: Los Angeles Fire Department Telephone: 213-978-3800 Last EDR Contact: 09/19/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/01/2024 Data Release Frequency: Varies LOS ANGELES CO LF METHANE: Methane Producing Landfills This data was created on April 30, 2012 to represent known disposal sites in Los Angeles County that may produce and emanate methane gas. The shapefile contains disposal sites within Los Angeles County that once accepted degradable refuse material. Information used to create this data was extracted from a landfill survey performed by County Engineers (Major Waste System Map, 1973) as well as historical records from CalRecycle, Regional Water Quality Control Board, and Los Angeles County Department of Public Health Date of Government Version: 01/10/2022 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/12/2022 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/04/2022 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: Los Angeles County Department of Public Works Telephone: 626-458-6973 Last EDR Contact: 07/13/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/23/2023 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LOS ANGELES HM: Active & Inactive Hazardous Materials Inventory A listing of active & inactive hazardous materials facility locations, located in the City of Los Angeles. Date of Government Version: 06/20/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/22/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/09/2023 Number of Days to Update: 48 Source: Los Angeles Fire Department Telephone: 213-978-3800 Last EDR Contact: 06/22/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/02/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC07449983.2r Page GR-46 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 792 LOS ANGELES UST: Active & Inactive UST Inventory A listing of active & inactive underground storage tank site locations and underground storage tank historical sites, located in the City of Los Angeles. Date of Government Version: 06/20/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/22/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/12/2023 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: Los Angeles Fire Department Telephone: 213-978-3800 Last EDR Contact: 06/22/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/02/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies SITE MIT LOS ANGELES: Site Mitigation List Industrial sites that have had some sort of spill or complaint. Date of Government Version: 03/02/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/18/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/07/2023 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: Community Health Services Telephone: 323-890-7806 Last EDR Contact: 07/20/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/30/2023 Data Release Frequency: Annually UST EL SEGUNDO: City of El Segundo Underground Storage Tank Underground storage tank sites located in El Segundo city. Date of Government Version: 01/21/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/19/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/10/2017 Number of Days to Update: 21 Source: City of El Segundo Fire Department Telephone: 310-524-2236 Last EDR Contact: 07/05/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/23/2023 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned UST LONG BEACH: City of Long Beach Underground Storage Tank Underground storage tank sites located in the city of Long Beach. Date of Government Version: 04/22/2019 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/23/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/27/2019 Number of Days to Update: 65 Source: City of Long Beach Fire Department Telephone: 562-570-2563 Last EDR Contact: 07/11/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/30/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies UST TORRANCE: City of Torrance Underground Storage Tank Underground storage tank sites located in the city of Torrance. Date of Government Version: 04/12/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/02/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/13/2023 Number of Days to Update: 42 Source: City of Torrance Fire Department Telephone: 310-618-2973 Last EDR Contact: 07/11/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/30/2023 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually MADERA COUNTY: CUPA MADERA: CUPA Facility List A listing of sites included in the county’s Certified Unified Program Agency database. California’s Secretary for Environmental Protection established the unified hazardous materials and hazardous waste regulatory program as required by chapter 6.11 of the California Health and Safety Code. The Unified Program consolidates the administration, permits, inspections, and enforcement activities. Date of Government Version: 08/10/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/12/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/23/2020 Number of Days to Update: 72 Source: Madera County Environmental Health Telephone: 559-675-7823 Last EDR Contact: 08/09/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/27/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies MARIN COUNTY: TC07449983.2r Page GR-47 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 793 UST MARIN: Underground Storage Tank Sites Currently permitted USTs in Marin County. Date of Government Version: 09/26/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/04/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/02/2018 Number of Days to Update: 29 Source: Public Works Department Waste Management Telephone: 415-473-6647 Last EDR Contact: 06/21/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/09/2023 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually MENDOCINO COUNTY: UST MENDOCINO: Mendocino County UST Database A listing of underground storage tank locations in Mendocino County. Date of Government Version: 09/22/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/18/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/22/2021 Number of Days to Update: 4 Source: Department of Public Health Telephone: 707-463-4466 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2023 Data Release Frequency: Annually MERCED COUNTY: CUPA MERCED: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility list. Date of Government Version: 02/15/2022 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/17/2022 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2022 Number of Days to Update: 83 Source: Merced County Environmental Health Telephone: 209-381-1094 Last EDR Contact: 07/25/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/27/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies MONO COUNTY: CUPA MONO: CUPA Facility List CUPA Facility List Date of Government Version: 02/22/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/02/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/19/2021 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: Mono County Health Department Telephone: 760-932-5580 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies MONTEREY COUNTY: CUPA MONTEREY: CUPA Facility Listing CUPA Program listing from the Environmental Health Division. Date of Government Version: 10/04/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/06/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/29/2021 Number of Days to Update: 84 Source: Monterey County Health Department Telephone: 831-796-1297 Last EDR Contact: 07/19/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/09/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies NAPA COUNTY: TC07449983.2r Page GR-48 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 794 LUST NAPA: Sites With Reported Contamination A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in Napa county. Date of Government Version: 01/09/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/11/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2017 Number of Days to Update: 50 Source: Napa County Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 707-253-4269 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2023 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned UST NAPA: Closed and Operating Underground Storage Tank Sites Underground storage tank sites located in Napa county. Date of Government Version: 09/05/2019 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/09/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/31/2019 Number of Days to Update: 52 Source: Napa County Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 707-253-4269 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2023 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned NEVADA COUNTY: CUPA NEVADA: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility list. Date of Government Version: 05/04/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/05/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/25/2023 Number of Days to Update: 81 Source: Community Development Agency Telephone: 530-265-1467 Last EDR Contact: 07/19/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/06/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies ORANGE COUNTY: IND_SITE ORANGE: List of Industrial Site Cleanups Petroleum and non-petroleum spills. Date of Government Version: 05/15/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/31/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/09/2023 Number of Days to Update: 9 Source: Health Care Agency Telephone: 714-834-3446 Last EDR Contact: 07/31/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/13/2023 Data Release Frequency: Annually LUST ORANGE: List of Underground Storage Tank Cleanups Orange County Underground Storage Tank Cleanups (LUST). Date of Government Version: 05/15/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/31/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/09/2023 Number of Days to Update: 9 Source: Health Care Agency Telephone: 714-834-3446 Last EDR Contact: 07/31/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/13/2023 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly UST ORANGE: List of Underground Storage Tank Facilities Orange County Underground Storage Tank Facilities (UST). Date of Government Version: 04/01/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/14/2023 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: Health Care Agency Telephone: 714-834-3446 Last EDR Contact: 08/03/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/13/2023 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PLACER COUNTY: TC07449983.2r Page GR-49 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 795 MS PLACER: Master List of Facilities List includes aboveground tanks, underground tanks and cleanup sites. Date of Government Version: 08/26/2022 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/29/2022 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/15/2022 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: Placer County Health and Human Services Telephone: 530-745-2363 Last EDR Contact: 07/31/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/11/2023 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually PLUMAS COUNTY: CUPA PLUMAS: CUPA Facility List Plumas County CUPA Program facilities. Date of Government Version: 03/31/2019 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/23/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/26/2019 Number of Days to Update: 64 Source: Plumas County Environmental Health Telephone: 530-283-6355 Last EDR Contact: 07/11/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/30/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies RIVERSIDE COUNTY: LUST RIVERSIDE: Listing of Underground Tank Cleanup Sites Riverside County Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Sites (LUST). Date of Government Version: 04/10/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/12/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/28/2023 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 951-358-5055 Last EDR Contact: 09/07/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/25/2023 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly UST RIVERSIDE: Underground Storage Tank Tank List Underground storage tank sites located in Riverside county. Date of Government Version: 04/10/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/12/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/13/2023 Number of Days to Update: 62 Source: Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 951-358-5055 Last EDR Contact: 09/07/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/25/2023 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SACRAMENTO COUNTY: CS SACRAMENTO: Toxic Site Clean-Up List List of sites where unauthorized releases of potentially hazardous materials have occurred. Date of Government Version: 11/07/2022 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/21/2022 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/16/2023 Number of Days to Update: 85 Source: Sacramento County Environmental Management Telephone: 916-875-8406 Last EDR Contact: 06/29/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/09/2023 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly ML SACRAMENTO: Master Hazardous Materials Facility List Any business that has hazardous materials on site - hazardous material storage sites, underground storage tanks, waste generators. Date of Government Version: 11/07/2022 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/09/2022 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/01/2023 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: Sacramento County Environmental Management Telephone: 916-875-8406 Last EDR Contact: 06/29/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/09/2023 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SAN BENITO COUNTY: TC07449983.2r Page GR-50 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 796 CUPA SAN BENITO: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 05/02/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/04/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/25/2023 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: San Benito County Environmental Health Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 07/26/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/13/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY: PERMITS SAN BERNARDINO: Hazardous Material Permits This listing includes underground storage tanks, medical waste handlers/generators, hazardous materials handlers, hazardous waste generators, and waste oil generators/handlers. Date of Government Version: 05/09/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/10/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/01/2023 Number of Days to Update: 83 Source: San Bernardino County Fire Department Hazardous Materials Division Telephone: 909-387-3041 Last EDR Contact: 07/26/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/13/2023 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SAN DIEGO COUNTY: HMMD SAN DIEGO: Hazardous Materials Management Division Database The database includes: HE58 - This report contains the business name, site address, business phone number, establishment ’H’ permit number, type of permit, and the business status. HE17 - In addition to providing the same information provided in the HE58 listing, HE17 provides inspection dates, violations received by the establishment, hazardous waste generated, the quantity, method of storage, treatment/disposal of waste and the hauler, and information on underground storage tanks. Unauthorized Release List - Includes a summary of environmental contamination cases in San Diego County (underground tank cases, non-tank cases, groundwater contamination, and soil contamination are included.) Date of Government Version: 05/25/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/25/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/16/2023 Number of Days to Update: 83 Source: Hazardous Materials Management Division Telephone: 619-338-2268 Last EDR Contact: 08/29/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/11/2023 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly LF SAN DIEGO: Solid Waste Facilities San Diego County Solid Waste Facilities. Date of Government Version: 04/04/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/05/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/27/2023 Number of Days to Update: 83 Source: Department of Health Services Telephone: 619-338-2209 Last EDR Contact: 07/11/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/30/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies SAN DIEGO CO LOP: Local Oversight Program Listing A listing of all LOP release sites that are or were under the County of San Diego’s jurisdiction. Included are closed or transferred cases, open cases, and cases that did not have a case type indicated. The cases without a case type are mostly complaints; however, some of them could be LOP cases. Date of Government Version: 07/22/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/19/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/13/2022 Number of Days to Update: 86 Source: Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 858-505-6874 Last EDR Contact: 07/11/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/30/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC07449983.2r Page GR-51 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 797 SAN DIEGO CO SAM: Environmental Case Listing The listing contains all underground tank release cases and projects pertaining to properties contaminated with hazardous substances that are actively under review by the Site Assessment and Mitigation Program. Date of Government Version: 03/23/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/15/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/09/2010 Number of Days to Update: 24 Source: San Diego County Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 619-338-2371 Last EDR Contact: 08/22/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/11/2023 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY: CUPA SAN FRANCISCO CO: CUPA Facility Listing Cupa facilities Date of Government Version: 04/28/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/28/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2023 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: San Francisco County Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 415-252-3896 Last EDR Contact: 07/26/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/13/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies LUST SAN FRANCISCO: Local Oversite Facilities A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in San Francisco county. Date of Government Version: 09/19/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/19/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2008 Number of Days to Update: 10 Source: Department Of Public Health San Francisco County Telephone: 415-252-3920 Last EDR Contact: 07/26/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/13/2023 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned UST SAN FRANCISCO: Underground Storage Tank Information Underground storage tank sites located in San Francisco county. Date of Government Version: 04/28/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/28/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/03/2023 Number of Days to Update: 5 Source: Department of Public Health Telephone: 415-252-3920 Last EDR Contact: 07/26/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/13/2023 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SAN FRANCISO COUNTY: SAN FRANCISCO MAHER: Maher Ordinance Property Listing a listing of properties that fall within a Maher Ordinance, for all of San Francisco Date of Government Version: 04/11/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/13/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/11/2023 Number of Days to Update: 89 Source: San Francisco Planning Telephone: 628-652-7483 Last EDR Contact: 07/18/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/30/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY: UST SAN JOAQUIN: San Joaquin Co. UST A listing of underground storage tank locations in San Joaquin county. Date of Government Version: 06/22/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/26/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/11/2018 Number of Days to Update: 15 Source: Environmental Health Department Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 09/07/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/25/2023 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY: TC07449983.2r Page GR-52 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 798 CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: CUPA Facility List Cupa Facility List. Date of Government Version: 05/10/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/11/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/31/2023 Number of Days to Update: 81 Source: San Luis Obispo County Public Health Department Telephone: 805-781-5596 Last EDR Contact: 08/09/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/27/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies SAN MATEO COUNTY: BI SAN MATEO: Business Inventory List includes Hazardous Materials Business Plan, hazardous waste generators, and underground storage tanks. Date of Government Version: 02/20/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/20/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/24/2020 Number of Days to Update: 64 Source: San Mateo County Environmental Health Services Division Telephone: 650-363-1921 Last EDR Contact: 09/08/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/18/2023 Data Release Frequency: Annually LUST SAN MATEO: Fuel Leak List A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in San Mateo county. Date of Government Version: 03/29/2019 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/29/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/29/2019 Number of Days to Update: 61 Source: San Mateo County Environmental Health Services Division Telephone: 650-363-1921 Last EDR Contact: 08/29/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/18/2023 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually SANTA BARBARA COUNTY: CUPA SANTA BARBARA: CUPA Facility Listing CUPA Program Listing from the Environmental Health Services division. Date of Government Version: 09/08/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/09/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/07/2011 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: Santa Barbara County Public Health Department Telephone: 805-686-8167 Last EDR Contact: 08/09/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/27/2023 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SANTA CLARA COUNTY: CUPA SANTA CLARA: Cupa Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 05/10/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/11/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/31/2023 Number of Days to Update: 81 Source: Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 408-918-1973 Last EDR Contact: 08/09/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/27/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies HIST LUST SANTA CLARA: HIST LUST - Fuel Leak Site Activity Report A listing of open and closed leaking underground storage tanks. This listing is no longer updated by the county. Leaking underground storage tanks are now handled by the Department of Environmental Health. Date of Government Version: 03/29/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/30/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/21/2005 Number of Days to Update: 22 Source: Santa Clara Valley Water District Telephone: 408-265-2600 Last EDR Contact: 03/23/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/22/2009 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned TC07449983.2r Page GR-53 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 799 LUST SANTA CLARA: LOP Listing A listing of leaking underground storage tanks located in Santa Clara county. Date of Government Version: 03/03/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/05/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/18/2014 Number of Days to Update: 13 Source: Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 408-918-3417 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2023 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SANTA CRUZ COUNTY: CUPA SANTA CRUZ: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility listing. Date of Government Version: 01/21/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/22/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/23/2017 Number of Days to Update: 90 Source: Santa Cruz County Environmental Health Telephone: 831-464-2761 Last EDR Contact: 08/09/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/27/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies SHASTA COUNTY: CUPA SHASTA: CUPA Facility List Cupa Facility List. Date of Government Version: 06/15/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/19/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/09/2017 Number of Days to Update: 51 Source: Shasta County Department of Resource Management Telephone: 530-225-5789 Last EDR Contact: 08/09/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/27/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies SOLANO COUNTY: LUST SOLANO: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in Solano county. Date of Government Version: 06/04/2019 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/06/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/13/2019 Number of Days to Update: 68 Source: Solano County Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 707-784-6770 Last EDR Contact: 08/22/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/11/2023 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly UST SOLANO: Underground Storage Tanks Underground storage tank sites located in Solano county. Date of Government Version: 09/15/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/16/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/09/2021 Number of Days to Update: 84 Source: Solano County Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 707-784-6770 Last EDR Contact: 08/22/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/11/2023 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SONOMA COUNTY: CUPA SONOMA: Cupa Facility List Cupa Facility list TC07449983.2r Page GR-54 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 800 Date of Government Version: 07/02/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/06/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2021 Number of Days to Update: 8 Source: County of Sonoma Fire & Emergency Services Department Telephone: 707-565-1174 Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/01/2024 Data Release Frequency: Varies LUST SONOMA: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Sites A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in Sonoma county. Date of Government Version: 06/30/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/30/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/24/2021 Number of Days to Update: 86 Source: Department of Health Services Telephone: 707-565-6565 Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/01/2024 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly STANISLAUS COUNTY: CUPA STANISLAUS: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 02/08/2022 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/10/2022 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2022 Number of Days to Update: 83 Source: Stanislaus County Department of Ennvironmental Protection Telephone: 209-525-6751 Last EDR Contact: 07/05/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/23/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies SUTTER COUNTY: UST SUTTER: Underground Storage Tanks Underground storage tank sites located in Sutter county. Date of Government Version: 08/03/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/24/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/12/2023 Number of Days to Update: 19 Source: Sutter County Environmental Health Services Telephone: 530-822-7500 Last EDR Contact: 08/22/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/11/2023 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually TEHAMA COUNTY: CUPA TEHAMA: CUPA Facility List Cupa facilities Date of Government Version: 05/11/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/11/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/31/2023 Number of Days to Update: 81 Source: Tehama County Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 530-527-8020 Last EDR Contact: 07/26/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/13/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies TRINITY COUNTY: CUPA TRINITY: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 04/12/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/13/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/28/2023 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 760-352-0381 Last EDR Contact: 07/11/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/30/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies TULARE COUNTY: TC07449983.2r Page GR-55 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 801 CUPA TULARE: CUPA Facility List Cupa program facilities Date of Government Version: 10/07/2022 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/07/2022 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/21/2022 Number of Days to Update: 75 Source: Tulare County Environmental Health Services Division Telephone: 559-624-7400 Last EDR Contact: 07/26/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/13/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies TUOLUMNE COUNTY: CUPA TUOLUMNE: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 04/23/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/25/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/25/2018 Number of Days to Update: 61 Source: Divison of Environmental Health Telephone: 209-533-5633 Last EDR Contact: 07/11/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/30/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies VENTURA COUNTY: BWT VENTURA: Business Plan, Hazardous Waste Producers, and Operating Underground Tanks The BWT list indicates by site address whether the Environmental Health Division has Business Plan (B), Waste Producer (W), and/or Underground Tank (T) information. Date of Government Version: 03/27/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/25/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2023 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: Ventura County Environmental Health Division Telephone: 805-654-2813 Last EDR Contact: 07/17/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/30/2023 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly LF VENTURA: Inventory of Illegal Abandoned and Inactive Sites Ventura County Inventory of Closed, Illegal Abandoned, and Inactive Sites. Date of Government Version: 12/01/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/01/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/19/2012 Number of Days to Update: 49 Source: Environmental Health Division Telephone: 805-654-2813 Last EDR Contact: 06/21/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/09/2023 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST VENTURA: Listing of Underground Tank Cleanup Sites Ventura County Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Sites (LUST). Date of Government Version: 05/29/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/24/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/31/2008 Number of Days to Update: 37 Source: Environmental Health Division Telephone: 805-654-2813 Last EDR Contact: 08/02/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/20/2023 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned MED WASTE VENTURA: Medical Waste Program List To protect public health and safety and the environment from potential exposure to disease causing agents, the Environmental Health Division Medical Waste Program regulates the generation, handling, storage, treatment and disposal of medical waste throughout the County. Date of Government Version: 03/27/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/21/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/07/2023 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: Ventura County Resource Management Agency Telephone: 805-654-2813 Last EDR Contact: 07/17/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/30/2023 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC07449983.2r Page GR-56 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 802 UST VENTURA: Underground Tank Closed Sites List Ventura County Operating Underground Storage Tank Sites (UST)/Underground Tank Closed Sites List. Date of Government Version: 05/26/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/02/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/14/2023 Number of Days to Update: 12 Source: Environmental Health Division Telephone: 805-654-2813 Last EDR Contact: 09/06/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/18/2023 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly YOLO COUNTY: UST YOLO: Underground Storage Tank Comprehensive Facility Report Underground storage tank sites located in Yolo county. Date of Government Version: 04/03/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/18/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/13/2023 Number of Days to Update: 56 Source: Yolo County Department of Health Telephone: 530-666-8646 Last EDR Contact: 06/21/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/09/2023 Data Release Frequency: Annually YUBA COUNTY: CUPA YUBA: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility listing for Yuba County. Date of Government Version: 05/04/2023 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/04/2023 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/25/2023 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: Yuba County Environmental Health Department Telephone: 530-749-7523 Last EDR Contact: 07/19/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/06/2023 Data Release Frequency: Varies OTHER DATABASE(S) Depending on the geographic area covered by this report, the data provided in these specialty databases may or may not be complete. For example, the existence of wetlands information data in a specific report does not mean that all wetlands in the area covered by the report are included. Moreover, the absence of any reported wetlands information does not necessarily mean that wetlands do not exist in the area covered by the report. CT MANIFEST: Hazardous Waste Manifest Data Facility and manifest data. Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a tsd facility. Date of Government Version: 11/16/2022 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/16/2022 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/06/2023 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: Department of Energy & Environmental Protection Telephone: 860-424-3375 Last EDR Contact: 08/08/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/20/2023 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned NJ MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/10/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/16/2019 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/27/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/16/2023 Data Release Frequency: Annually TC07449983.2r Page GR-57 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 803 NY MANIFEST: Facility and Manifest Data Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a TSD facility. Date of Government Version: 01/01/2019 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/29/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/19/2022 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: Department of Environmental Conservation Telephone: 518-402-8651 Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/06/2023 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PA MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 06/30/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/19/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/10/2019 Number of Days to Update: 53 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 717-783-8990 Last EDR Contact: 07/06/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/23/2023 Data Release Frequency: Annually RI MANIFEST: Manifest information Hazardous waste manifest information Date of Government Version: 12/31/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/30/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2022 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 401-222-2797 Last EDR Contact: 08/10/2022 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/27/2023 Data Release Frequency: Annually WI MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 05/31/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/19/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/03/2019 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: Department of Natural Resources Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 08/30/2023 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/18/2023 Data Release Frequency: Annually Oil/Gas Pipelines Source: Endeavor Business Media Petroleum Bundle (Crude Oil, Refined Products, Petrochemicals, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty Gases (Miscellaneous)) N = Natural Gas Bundle (Natural Gas, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty Gases (Miscellaneous)). This map includes information copyrighted by Endeavor Business Media. This information is provided on a best effort basis and Endeavor Business Media does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its fitness for any particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of Endeavor Business Media. Electric Power Transmission Line Data Source: Endeavor Business Media This map includes information copyrighted by Endeavor Business Media. This information is provided on a best effort basis and Endeavor Business Media does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its fitness for any particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of Endeavor Business Media. Sensitive Receptors: There are individuals deemed sensitive receptors due to their fragile immune systems and special sensitivity to environmental discharges. These sensitive receptors typically include the elderly, the sick, and children. While the location of all sensitive receptors cannot be determined, EDR indicates those buildings and facilities - schools, daycares, hospitals, medical centers, and nursing homes - where individuals who are sensitive receptors are likely to be located. AHA Hospitals: Source: American Hospital Association, Inc. Telephone: 312-280-5991 The database includes a listing of hospitals based on the American Hospital Association’s annual survey of hospitals. Medical Centers: Provider of Services Listing Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Telephone: 410-786-3000 A listing of hospitals with Medicare provider number, produced by Centers of Medicare & Medicaid Services, a federal agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. TC07449983.2r Page GR-58 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 804 Nursing Homes Source: National Institutes of Health Telephone: 301-594-6248 Information on Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes in the United States. Public Schools Source: National Center for Education Statistics Telephone: 202-502-7300 The National Center for Education Statistics’ primary database on elementary and secondary public education in the United States. It is a comprehensive, annual, national statistical database of all public elementary and secondary schools and school districts, which contains data that are comparable across all states. Private Schools Source: National Center for Education Statistics Telephone: 202-502-7300 The National Center for Education Statistics’ primary database on private school locations in the United States. Daycare Centers: Licensed Facilities Source: Department of Social Services Telephone: 916-657-4041 Flood Zone Data: This data was obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). It depicts 100-year and 500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. It includes the National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) which incorporates Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) data and Q3 data from FEMA in areas not covered by NFHL. Source: FEMA Telephone: 877-336-2627 Date of Government Version: 2003, 2015 NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2002, 2005, 2010 and 2015 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. State Wetlands Data: Wetland Inventory Source: Department of Fish and Wildlife Telephone: 916-445-0411 Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map Source: U.S. Geological Survey STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION © 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material. TC07449983.2r Page GR-59 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 805 TC07449983.2r Page A-1 geologic strata. of the soil, and nearby wells. Groundwater flow velocity is generally impacted by the nature of the Groundwater flow direction may be impacted by surface topography, hydrology, hydrogeology, characteristics 2. Groundwater flow velocity. 1. Groundwater flow direction, and Assessment of the impact of contaminant migration generally has two principle investigative components: forming an opinion about the impact of potential contaminant migration. EDR’s GeoCheck Physical Setting Source Addendum is provided to assist the environmental professional in 2018Version Date: 12002866 MYOMA, CANortheast Map: 2018Version Date: 12002826 CATHEDRAL CITY, CATarget Property Map: USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP 307 ft. above sea levelElevation: 3737932.5UTM Y (Meters): 557297.3UTM X (Meters): Zone 11Universal Tranverse Mercator: 116.381146 - 116˚ 22’ 52.13’’Longitude (West): 33.781721 - 33˚ 46’ 54.20’’Latitude (North): TARGET PROPERTY COORDINATES PALM DESERT, CA 92211 SHADOW RIDGE ROAD SHADOW RIDGE ROAD TARGET PROPERTY ADDRESS ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE ADDENDUM® 806 TC07449983.2r Page A-2 should be field verified. on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity Source: Topography has been determined from the USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated SURROUNDING TOPOGRAPHY: ELEVATION PROFILES Elevation (ft)Elevation (ft)TP TP 0 1/2 1 Miles✩Target Property Elevation: 307 ft. North South West East273278282288291298298301303307311314311307299275261235215307307307304301304309311311307307307304294287274262246229General SSEGeneral Topographic Gradient: TARGET PROPERTY TOPOGRAPHY should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, Surface topography may be indicative of the direction of surficial groundwater flow. This information can be used to TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION collected on nearby properties, and regional groundwater flow information (from deep aquifers). sources of information, such as surface topographic information, hydrologic information, hydrogeologic data using site-specific well data. If such data is not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary to rely on other Groundwater flow direction for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION INFORMATION ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® 807 TC07449983.2r Page A-3 Not Reported GENERAL DIRECTIONLOCATION GROUNDWATER FLOWFROM TPMAP ID hydrogeologically, and the depth to water table. authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, groundwater flow direction as determined flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted by environmental professionals to regulatory EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System to provide data on the general direction of groundwater AQUIFLOW® Search Radius: 1.000 Mile. Not found Status: 1.25 miles Search Radius: Site-Specific Hydrogeological Data*: * ©1996 Site-specific hydrogeological data gathered by CERCLIS Alerts, Inc., Bainbridge Island, WA. All rights reserved. All of the information and opinions presented are those of the cited EPA report(s), which were completed under a Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) investigation. contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should of groundwater flow direction in the immediate area. Such hydrogeologic information can be used to assist the Hydrogeologic information obtained by installation of wells on a specific site can often be an indicator HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION YES - refer to the Overview Map and Detail MapCATHEDRAL CITY NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY NWI Electronic Data CoverageNWI Quad at Target Property FEMA FIRM Flood data06065C1615G Additional Panels in search area:FEMA Source Type FEMA FIRM Flood data06065C1595G Flood Plain Panel at Target Property FEMA Source Type FEMA FLOOD ZONE and bodies of water). Refer to the Physical Setting Source Map following this summary for hydrologic information (major waterways contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should Surface water can act as a hydrologic barrier to groundwater flow. Such hydrologic information can be used to assist HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® 808 TC07449983.2r Page A-4 Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994). of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - a digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology ROCK STRATIGRAPHIC UNIT GEOLOGIC AGE IDENTIFICATION Stratifed SequenceCategory:CenozoicEra: QuaternarySystem: QuaternarySeries: QCode: (decoded above as Era, System & Series) at which contaminant migration may be occurring. Geologic information can be used by the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the relative speed GEOLOGIC INFORMATION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY move more quickly through sandy-gravelly types of soils than silty-clayey types of soils. characteristics data collected on nearby properties and regional soil information. In general, contaminant plumes to rely on other sources of information, including geologic age identification, rock stratigraphic unit and soil using site specific geologic and soil strata data. If such data are not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary Groundwater flow velocity information for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional GROUNDWATER FLOW VELOCITY INFORMATION ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® 809 EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc. 2 1 0 1/16 1/8 1/4 Miles 810 TC07449983.2r Page A-6 Somewhat excessively drainedSoil Drainage Class: excessively drained sands and gravels. Class A - High infiltration rates. Soils are deep, well drained toHydrologic Group: fine sandSoil Surface Texture: MyomaSoil Component Name: Soil Map ID: 2 7.9 Max: 9 Min: Min: 42 Max: 141 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED and Sand. Clayey Gravel 200), Silty, or passing No. pct. or less materials (35 Granularsand59 inches18 inches 2 7.9 Max: 9 Min: Min: 42 Max: 141 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED and Sand. Clayey Gravel 200), Silty, or passing No. pct. or less materials (35 Granularfine sand18 inches 0 inches 1 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) > 0 inchesDepth to Watertable Min: > 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min: HighCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Hydric Status: Partially hydric Somewhat excessively drainedSoil Drainage Class: excessively drained sands and gravels. Class A - High infiltration rates. Soils are deep, well drained toHydrologic Group: fine sandSoil Surface Texture: MyomaSoil Component Name: Soil Map ID: 1 in a landscape. The following information is based on Soil Conservation Service SSURGO data. for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Soil Conservation Service (SCS) leads the National Cooperative Soil DOMINANT SOIL COMPOSITION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® 811 TC07449983.2r Page A-7 No Wells Found FEDERAL USGS WELL INFORMATION LOCATION FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID 1.000State Database Nearest PWS within 1 mileFederal FRDS PWS 1.000Federal USGS WELL SEARCH DISTANCE INFORMATION SEARCH DISTANCE (miles)DATABASE opinion about the impact of contaminant migration on nearby drinking water wells. professional in assessing sources that may impact ground water flow direction, and in forming an EDR Local/Regional Water Agency records provide water well information to assist the environmental LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS 7.9 Max: 9 Min: Min: 42 Max: 141 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED and Sand. Clayey Gravel 200), Silty, or passing No. pct. or less materials (35 Granularsand59 inches18 inches 2 7.9 Max: 9 Min: Min: 42 Max: 141 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED and Sand. Clayey Gravel 200), Silty, or passing No. pct. or less materials (35 Granularfine sand18 inches 0 inches 1 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) > 0 inchesDepth to Watertable Min: > 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min: HighCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Hydric Status: Partially hydric ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® 812 TC07449983.2r Page A-8 1/2 - 1 Mile SECADDW0000009475 5 1/2 - 1 Mile SSWCADDW0000010423 4 1/2 - 1 Mile SSWCADDW0000009925 3 1/4 - 1/2 Mile NNWCADDW0000012586 2 1/4 - 1/2 Mile NNECADDW0000011521 1 STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION LOCATION FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID Note: PWS System location is not always the same as well location. No PWS System Found FEDERAL FRDS PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM INFORMATION LOCATION FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® 813 EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.200240240 3202 802 8 0 2 40320 3 2 0 2 8 0 280 2 80240 240 28 0280280 24 0 24 0 20 0 2 00CA 814 TC07449983.2r Page A-10 Not ReportedGeoTracker Data: date=&global_id=&assigned_name=3310001-217&store_num= https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=DHS&samp_Groundwater Quality Data: Not ReportedGAMA PFAS Testing: WELL 4612-1Other Name: Department of Health ServicesSource: MUNICIPALWell Type: 3310001-217Well ID: 4 SSW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower CADDW0000010423CA WELLS Not ReportedGeoTracker Data: date=&global_id=&assigned_name=3310001-178&store_num= https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=DHS&samp_Groundwater Quality Data: Not ReportedGAMA PFAS Testing: WELL 4611-1Other Name: Department of Health ServicesSource: MUNICIPALWell Type: 3310001-178Well ID: 3 SSW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower CADDW0000009925CA WELLS Not ReportedGeoTracker Data: date=&global_id=&assigned_name=3310001-210&store_num= https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=DHS&samp_Groundwater Quality Data: Not ReportedGAMA PFAS Testing: WELL 4613-1Other Name: Department of Health ServicesSource: MUNICIPALWell Type: 3310001-210Well ID: 2 NNW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher CADDW0000012586CA WELLS Not ReportedGeoTracker Data: date=&global_id=&assigned_name=3310001-216&store_num= https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=DHS&samp_Groundwater Quality Data: Not ReportedGAMA PFAS Testing: WELL 4614-2Other Name: Department of Health ServicesSource: MUNICIPALWell Type: 3310001-216Well ID: 1 NNE 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Lower CADDW0000011521CA WELLS Map ID Direction Distance Elevation EDR ID NumberDatabase ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® 815 TC07449983.2r Page A-11 Not ReportedGeoTracker Data: date=&global_id=&assigned_name=3310001-200&store_num= https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=DHS&samp_Groundwater Quality Data: Not ReportedGAMA PFAS Testing: WELL 5676-2Other Name: Department of Health ServicesSource: MUNICIPALWell Type: 3310001-200Well ID: 5 SE 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower CADDW0000009475CA WELLS Map ID Direction Distance Elevation EDR ID NumberDatabase ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® 816 TC07449983.2r Page A-12 0%0%100%1.700 pCi/LBasement 0%0%100%0.450 pCi/LLiving Area - 2nd Floor 0%0%100%0.117 pCi/LLiving Area - 1st Floor % >20 pCi/L% 4-20 pCi/L% <4 pCi/LAverage ActivityArea Number of sites tested: 12 Federal Area Radon Information for RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CA : Zone 3 indoor average level < 2 pCi/L. : Zone 2 indoor average level >= 2 pCi/L and <= 4 pCi/L. Note: Zone 1 indoor average level > 4 pCi/L. Federal EPA Radon Zone for RIVERSIDE County: 2 01092211 ______________________ > 4 pCi/LNum TestsZipcode Radon Test Results State Database: CA Radon AREA RADON INFORMATION GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS RADON ® 817 TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model (DEM) Source: United States Geologic Survey EDR acquired the USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model in 2002 and updated it in 2006. The 7.5 minute DEM corresponds to the USGS 1:24,000- and 1:25,000-scale topographic quadrangle maps. The DEM provides elevation data with consistent elevation units and projection. Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map Source: U.S. Geological Survey HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION Flood Zone Data: This data was obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). It depicts 100-year and 500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. It includes the National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) which incorporates Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) data and Q3 data from FEMA in areas not covered by NFHL. Source: FEMA Telephone: 877-336-2627 Date of Government Version: 2003, 2015 NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2002, 2005, 2010 and 2015 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. State Wetlands Data: Wetland Inventory Source: Department of Fish and Wildlife Telephone: 916-445-0411 HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION AQUIFLOW Information SystemR Source: EDR proprietary database of groundwater flow information EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System (AIS) to provide data on the general direction of groundwater flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted to regulatory authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, hydrogeologically determined groundwater flow direction and depth to water table information. GEOLOGIC INFORMATION Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - A digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994). STATSGO: State Soil Geographic Database Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) leads the national Conservation Soil Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns in a landscape. Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed (SSURGO) soil survey maps. SSURGO: Soil Survey Geographic Database Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Telephone: 800-672-5559 SSURGO is the most detailed level of mapping done by the Natural Resources Conservation Service, mapping scales generally range from 1:12,000 to 1:63,360. Field mapping methods using national standards are used to construct the soil maps in the Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database. SSURGO digitizing duplicates the original soil survey maps. This level of mapping is designed for use by landowners, townships and county natural resource planning and management. TC07449983.2r Page PSGR-1 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED 818 LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS FEDERAL WATER WELLS PWS: Public Water Systems Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water Telephone: 202-564-3750 Public Water System data from the Federal Reporting Data System. A PWS is any water system which provides water to at least 25 people for at least 60 days annually. PWSs provide water from wells, rivers and other sources. PWS ENF: Public Water Systems Violation and Enforcement Data Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water Telephone: 202-564-3750 Violation and Enforcement data for Public Water Systems from the Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) after August 1995. Prior to August 1995, the data came from the Federal Reporting Data System (FRDS). USGS Water Wells: USGS National Water Inventory System (NWIS) This database contains descriptive information on sites where the USGS collects or has collected data on surface water and/or groundwater. The groundwater data includes information on wells, springs, and other sources of groundwater. OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION Groundwater Ambient Monitoring & Assessment Program State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-341-5577 The GAMA Program is Californias comprehensive groundwater quality monitoring program. GAMA collects data by testing the untreated, raw water in different types of wells for naturally-occurring and man-made chemicals. The GAMA data includes Domestic, Monitoring and Municipal well types from the following sources, Department of Water Resources, Department of Heath Services, EDF, Agricultural Lands, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Department of Pesticide Regulation, United States Geological Survey, Groundwater Ambient Monitoring and Assessment Program and Local Groundwater Projects. Water Well Database Source: Department of Water Resources Telephone: 916-651-9648 California Drinking Water Quality Database Source: Department of Public Health Telephone: 916-324-2319 The database includes all drinking water compliance and special studies monitoring for the state of California since 1984. It consists of over 3,200,000 individual analyses along with well and water system information. California Oil and Gas Well Locations Source: Dept of Conservation, Geologic Energy Management Division Telephone: 916-323-1779 Oil and Gas well locations in the state. California Earthquake Fault Lines Source: California Division of Mines and Geology The fault lines displayed on EDR’s Topographic map are digitized quaternary fault lines prepared in 1975 by the United State Geological Survey. Additional information (also from 1975) regarding activity at specific fault lines comes from California’s Preliminary Fault Activity Map prepared by the California Division of Mines and Geology. RADON State Database: CA Radon Source: Department of Public Health Telephone: 916-210-8558 Radon Database for California TC07449983.2r Page PSGR-2 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED 819 Area Radon Information Source: USGS Telephone: 703-356-4020 The National Radon Database has been developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and is a compilation of the EPA/State Residential Radon Survey and the National Residential Radon Survey. The study covers the years 1986 - 1992. Where necessary data has been supplemented by information collected at private sources such as universities and research institutions. EPA Radon Zones Source: EPA Telephone: 703-356-4020 Sections 307 & 309 of IRAA directed EPA to list and identify areas of U.S. with the potential for elevated indoor radon levels. OTHER Airport Landing Facilities: Private and public use landing facilities Source: Federal Aviation Administration, 800-457-6656 Epicenters: World earthquake epicenters, Richter 5 or greater Source: Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration California Earthquake Fault Lines: The fault lines displayed on EDR’s Topographic map are digitized quaternary fault lines, prepared in 1975 by the United State Geological Survey. Additional information (also from 1975) regarding activity at specific fault lines comes from California’s Preliminary Fault Activity Map prepared by the California Division of Mines and Geology. STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION © 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material. TC07449983.2r Page PSGR-3 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED 820 APPENDIX E Historical Records Documentation 821 EDR Historical Topo Map Report Inquiry Number: 6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor Shelton, CT 06484 Toll Free: 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.com with QuadMatch™ Shadow Ridge Road Shadow Ridge Road Palm Desert, CA 92211 September 20, 2023 7449983.4 822 EDR Historical Topo Map Report EDR Inquiry # Search Results: P.O.# Project: Maps Provided: Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, LLC or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. page- Coordinates: Latitude: Longitude: UTM Zone: UTM X Meters: UTM Y Meters: Elevation: Contact: Site Name: Client Name: 2018 2015 2012 1978, 1981 1975 1972 1958 1947 1944 1941 1904 09/20/23 Shadow Ridge Road Hillmann Environmental Co. Shadow Ridge Road 1745 W Orangewood Avenue Palm Desert, CA 92211 Orange, CA 92868-0000 7449983.4 Amada Lagunas EDR Topographic Map Library has been searched by EDR and maps covering the target property location as provided by Hillmann Environmental Co. were identified for the years listed below. EDR’s Historical Topo Map Report is designed to assist professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDRs Historical Topo Map Report includes a search of a collection of public and private color historical topographic maps, dating back to the late 1800s. NA 33.781721 33° 46' 54" North C3-9749 -116.381146 -116° 22' 52" West Zone 11 North 557296.02 3738126.12 307.16' above sea level This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, LLC. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. This Report is provided on an “AS IS”, “AS AVAILABLE” basis. NO WARRANTY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, LLC AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES, AFFILIATES AND THIRD PARTY SUPPLIERS DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, OF ANY KIND OR NATURE, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THIS REPORT OR ANY OF THE DATA AND INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THIS REPORT, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES REGARDING ACCURACY, QUALITY, CORRECTNESS, COMPLETENESS, COMPREHENSIVENESS, SUITABILITY, MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, TITLE, NON-INFRINGEMENT, MISAPPROPRIATION, OR OTHERWISE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, LLC OR ITS SUBSIDIARIES, AFFILIATES OR THIRD PARTY SUPPLIERS BE LIABLE TO ANYONE FOR ANY DIRECT, INCIDENTAL, INDIRECT, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR OTHER DAMAGES OF ANY TYPE OR KIND (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO LOSS OF PROFITS, LOSS OF USE, OR LOSS OF DATA), ARISING OUT OF OR IN ANY WAY CONNECTED WITH THIS REPORT OR ANY OF THE DATA AND INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THIS REPORT. Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels, or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only an assessment performed by a qualified environmental professional can provide findings, opinions or conclusions regarding the environmental risk or conditions in, on or at any property. Copyright 2023 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. 7449983 4 2 823 page Topo Sheet Key This EDR Topo Map Report is based upon the following USGS topographic map sheets. - 2018 Source Sheets 2018 Cathedral City 7.5-minute, 24000 2018 Myoma 7.5-minute, 24000 2015 Source Sheets 2015 Cathedral City 7.5-minute, 24000 2015 Myoma 7.5-minute, 24000 2012 Source Sheets 2012 Cathedral City 7.5-minute, 24000 2012 Myoma 7.5-minute, 24000 1978, 1981 Source Sheets 1978 Myoma 7.5-minute, 24000 Aerial Photo Revised 1972 1981 Cathedral City 7.5-minute, 24000 Aerial Photo Revised 1978 7449983 4 3 824 page Topo Sheet Key This EDR Topo Map Report is based upon the following USGS topographic map sheets. - 1975 Source Sheets 1975 Cathedral City 7.5-minute, 24000 Aerial Photo Revised 1975 1972 Source Sheets 1972 Myoma 7.5-minute, 24000 Aerial Photo Revised 1972 1972 Cathedral City 7.5-minute, 24000 Aerial Photo Revised 1972 1958 Source Sheets 1958 Cathedral City 7.5-minute, 24000 Aerial Photo Revised 1956 1958 Myoma 7.5-minute, 24000 Aerial Photo Revised 1956 1947 Source Sheets 1947 THOUSAND PALMS 15-minute, 50000 7449983 4 4 825 page Topo Sheet Key This EDR Topo Map Report is based upon the following USGS topographic map sheets. - 1944 Source Sheets 1944 Edom 15-minute, 62500 Aerial Photo Revised 1941 1941 Source Sheets 1941 Edom 15-minute, 62500 Aerial Photo Revised 1941 1904 Source Sheets 1904 Indio 30-minute, 125000 7449983 4 5 826 Historical Topo Map page SITE NAME: ADDRESS: CLIENT: This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). - EW SW S SE NW N NE 2018 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 Shadow Ridge Road Shadow Ridge Road Palm Desert, CA 92211 Hillmann Environmental Co. TP, Cathedral City, 2018, 7.5-minute NE, Myoma, 2018, 7.5-minute 7449983 4 6 827 Historical Topo Map page SITE NAME: ADDRESS: CLIENT: This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). - EW SW S SE NW N NE 2015 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 Shadow Ridge Road Shadow Ridge Road Palm Desert, CA 92211 Hillmann Environmental Co. TP, Cathedral City, 2015, 7.5-minute NE, Myoma, 2015, 7.5-minute 7449983 4 7 828 Historical Topo Map page SITE NAME: ADDRESS: CLIENT: This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). - EW SW S SE NW N NE 2012 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 Shadow Ridge Road Shadow Ridge Road Palm Desert, CA 92211 Hillmann Environmental Co. TP, Cathedral City, 2012, 7.5-minute NE, Myoma, 2012, 7.5-minute 7449983 4 8 829 Historical Topo Map page SITE NAME: ADDRESS: CLIENT: This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). - EW SW S SE NW N NE 1978, 1981 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 Shadow Ridge Road Shadow Ridge Road Palm Desert, CA 92211 Hillmann Environmental Co. TP, Cathedral City, 1981, 7.5-minute NE, Myoma, 1978, 7.5-minute 7449983 4 9 830 Historical Topo Map page SITE NAME: ADDRESS: CLIENT: This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). - EW SW S SE NW N NE 1975 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 Shadow Ridge Road Shadow Ridge Road Palm Desert, CA 92211 Hillmann Environmental Co. TP, Cathedral City, 1975, 7.5-minute 7449983 4 10 831 Historical Topo Map page SITE NAME: ADDRESS: CLIENT: This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). - EW SW S SE NW N NE 1972 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 Shadow Ridge Road Shadow Ridge Road Palm Desert, CA 92211 Hillmann Environmental Co. TP, Cathedral City, 1972, 7.5-minute NE, Myoma, 1972, 7.5-minute 7449983 4 11 832 Historical Topo Map page SITE NAME: ADDRESS: CLIENT: This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). - EW SW S SE NW N NE 1958 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 Shadow Ridge Road Shadow Ridge Road Palm Desert, CA 92211 Hillmann Environmental Co. TP, Cathedral City, 1958, 7.5-minute NE, Myoma, 1958, 7.5-minute 7449983 4 12 833 Historical Topo Map page SITE NAME: ADDRESS: CLIENT: This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). - EW SW S SE NW N NE 1947 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 Shadow Ridge Road Shadow Ridge Road Palm Desert, CA 92211 Hillmann Environmental Co. TP, THOUSAND PALMS, 1947, 15-minute 7449983 4 13 834 Historical Topo Map page SITE NAME: ADDRESS: CLIENT: This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). - EW SW S SE NW N NE 1944 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 Shadow Ridge Road Shadow Ridge Road Palm Desert, CA 92211 Hillmann Environmental Co. TP, Edom, 1944, 15-minute 7449983 4 14 835 Historical Topo Map page SITE NAME: ADDRESS: CLIENT: This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). - EW SW S SE NW N NE 1941 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 Shadow Ridge Road Shadow Ridge Road Palm Desert, CA 92211 Hillmann Environmental Co. TP, Edom, 1941, 15-minute 7449983 4 15 836 Historical Topo Map page SITE NAME: ADDRESS: CLIENT: This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). - EW SW S SE NW N NE 1904 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 Shadow Ridge Road Shadow Ridge Road Palm Desert, CA 92211 Hillmann Environmental Co. TP, Indio, 1904, 30-minute 7449983 4 16 837 Certified Sanborn® Map Report Inquiry Number: 6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor Shelton, CT 06484 Toll Free: 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.com Shadow Ridge Road Shadow Ridge Road Palm Desert, CA 92211 September 20, 2023 7449983.3 838 Certified Sanborn® Map Report Certified Sanborn Results: Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, LLC or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. page- The Sanborn Library includes more than 1.2 million fire insurance maps from Sanborn, Bromley, Perris & Browne, Hopkins, Barlow and others which track historical property usage in approximately 12,000 American cities and towns. Collections searched: Library of Congress University Publications of America EDR Private Collection The Sanborn Library LLC Since 1866™ Limited Permission To Make Copies Sanborn® Library search results Contact:EDR Inquiry # Site Name: Client Name: Certification # PO # Project 09/20/23 Shadow Ridge Road Shadow Ridge Road Hillmann Environmental Co. 1745 W Orangewood Avenue Palm Desert, CA 92211 7449983.3 Orange, CA 92868-0000 Amada Lagunas The Sanborn Library has been searched by EDR and maps covering the target property location as provided by Hillmann Environmental Co. were identified for the years listed below. The Sanborn Library is the largest, most complete collection of fire insurance maps. The collection includes maps from Sanborn, Bromley, Perris & Browne, Hopkins, Barlow, and others. Only Environmental Data Resources Inc. (EDR) is authorized to grant rights for commercial reproduction of maps by the Sanborn Library LLC, the copyright holder for the collection. Results can be authenticated by visiting www.edrnet.com/sanborn. The Sanborn Library is continually enhanced with newly identified map archives. This report accesses all maps in the collection as of the day this report was generated. 7312-4D94-845B NA UNMAPPED PROPERTY C3-9749 This report certifies that the complete holdings of the Sanborn Library, LLC collection have been searched based on client supplied target property information, and fire insurance maps covering the target property were not found. Certification #: 7312-4D94-845B Hillmann Environmental Co. (the client) is permitted to make up to FIVE photocopies of this Sanborn Map transmittal and each fire insurance map accompanying this report solely for the limited use of its customer. No one other than the client is authorized to make copies. Upon request made directly to an EDR Account Executive, the client may be permitted to make a limited number of additional photocopies. This permission is conditioned upon compliance by the client, its customer and their agents with EDR's copyright policy; a copy of which is available upon request. This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, LLC. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. This Report is provided on an “AS IS”, “AS AVAILABLE” basis. NO WARRANTY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, LLC AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES, AFFILIATES AND THIRD PARTY SUPPLIERS DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, OF ANY KIND OR NATURE, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THIS REPORT OR ANY OF THE DATA AND INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THIS REPORT, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES REGARDING ACCURACY, QUALITY, CORRECTNESS, COMPLETENESS, COMPREHENSIVENESS, SUITABILITY, MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, TITLE, NON-INFRINGEMENT, MISAPPROPRIATION, OR OTHERWISE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, LLC OR ITS SUBSIDIARIES, AFFILIATES OR THIRD PARTY SUPPLIERS BE LIABLE TO ANYONE FOR ANY DIRECT, INCIDENTAL, INDIRECT, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR OTHER DAMAGES OF ANY TYPE OR KIND (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO LOSS OF PROFITS, LOSS OF USE, OR LOSS OF DATA), ARISING OUT OF OR IN ANY WAY CONNECTED WITH THIS REPORT OR ANY OF THE DATA AND INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THIS REPORT. Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels, or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only an assessment performed by a qualified environmental professional can provide findings, opinions or conclusions regarding the environmental risk or conditions in, on or at any property. Copyright 2023 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. 7449983 3 2 839 The EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package Shadow Ridge Road Shadow Ridge Road Palm Desert, CA 92211 Inquiry Number: September 21, 2023 7449983.8 6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor Shelton, CT 06484 Toll Free: 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.com 840 2020 1"=500'Flight Year: 2020 USDA/NAIP 2016 1"=500'Flight Year: 2016 USDA/NAIP 2012 1"=500'Flight Year: 2012 USDA/NAIP 2009 1"=500'Flight Year: 2009 USDA/NAIP 2005 1"=500'Flight Year: 2005 USDA/NAIP 2002 1"=500'Acquisition Date: January 01, 2002 USGS/DOQQ 1996 1"=500'Acquisition Date: January 01, 1996 USGS/DOQQ 1984 1"=500'Flight Date: August 24, 1984 USDA 1972 1"=500'Flight Date: August 17, 1972 USDA 1965 1"=500'Flight Date: August 31, 1965 USGS 1959 1"=500'Flight Date: June 06, 1959 USDA 1953 1"=500'Flight Date: September 19, 1953 USDA EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package 09/21/23 Shadow Ridge Road Site Name:Client Name: Hillmann Environmental Co. Shadow Ridge Road 1745 W Orangewood Avenue Palm Desert, CA 92211 Orange, CA 92868-0000 EDR Inquiry #7449983.8 Contact:Amada Lagunas Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR) Aerial Photo Decade Package is a screening tool designed to assist environmental professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDR’s professional researchers provide digitally reproduced historical aerial photographs, and when available, provide one photo per decade. Search Results: Year Scale Details Source When delivered electronically by EDR, the aerial photo images included with this report are for ONE TIME USE ONLY. Further reproduction of these aerial photo images is prohibited without permission from EDR. For more information contact your EDR Account Executive. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice Copyright 2023 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, LLC or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. 7449983 8-page 2 This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, LLC. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. This Report is provided on an “AS IS”, “AS AVAILABLE” basis. NO WARRANTY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, LLC AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES, AFFILIATES AND THIRD PARTY SUPPLIERS DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, OF ANY KIND OR NATURE, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THIS REPORT OR ANY OF THE DATA AND INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THIS REPORT, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES REGARDING ACCURACY, QUALITY, CORRECTNESS, COMPLETENESS, COMPREHENSIVENESS, SUITABILITY, MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, TITLE, NON-INFRINGEMENT, MISAPPROPRIATION, OR OTHERWISE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, LLC OR ITS SUBSIDIARIES, AFFILIATES OR THIRD PARTY SUPPLIERS BE LIABLE TO ANYONE FOR ANY DIRECT, INCIDENTAL, INDIRECT, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR OTHER DAMAGES OF ANY TYPE OR KIND (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO LOSS OF PROFITS, LOSS OF USE, OR LOSS OF DATA), ARISING OUT OF OR IN ANY WAY CONNECTED WITH THIS REPORT OR ANY OF THE DATA AND INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THIS REPORT. Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels, or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only an assessment performed by a qualified environmental professional can provide findings, opinions or conclusions regarding the environmental risk or conditions in, on or at any property. 841 7449983.8 2020 = 500'842 7449983.8 2016 = 500'843 7449983.8 2012 = 500'844 7449983.8 2009 = 500'845 7449983.8 2005 = 500'846 7449983.8 2002 = 500'847 7449983.8 1996 = 500' Subject boundary not shown because it exceeds image extent or image is not georeferenced.848 7449983.8 1984 = 500'849 7449983.8 1972 = 500'850 7449983.8 1965 = 500'851 7449983.8 1959 = 500'852 7449983.8 1953 = 500'853 Shadow Ridge Road Shadow Ridge Road Palm Desert, CA 92211 Inquiry Number: 7449983.5 September 25, 2023 The EDR-City Directory Image Report 6 Armstrong Road Shelton, CT 06484 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.comEnvironmental Data Resources IncEnvironmental Data Resources IncEnvironmental Data Resources IncEnvironmental Data Resources Inc 854 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION Executive Summary Findings City Directory Images Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, LLC. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. This Report is provided on an “AS IS”, “AS AVAILABLE” basis. NO WARRANTY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, LLC AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES, AFFILIATES AND THIRD PARTY SUPPLIERS DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, OF ANY KIND OR NATURE, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THIS REPORT OR ANY OF THE DATA AND INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THIS REPORT, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES REGARDING ACCURACY, QUALITY, CORRECTNESS, COMPLETENESS, COMPREHENSIVENESS, SUITABILITY, MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, TITLE, NON-INFRINGEMENT, MISAPPROPRIATION, OR OTHERWISE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, LLC OR ITS SUBSIDIARIES, AFFILIATES OR THIRD PARTY SUPPLIERS BE LIABLE TO ANYONE FOR ANY DIRECT, INCIDENTAL, INDIRECT, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR OTHER DAMAGES OF ANY TYPE OR KIND (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO LOSS OF PROFITS, LOSS OF USE, OR LOSS OF DATA), ARISING OUT OF OR IN ANY WAY CONNECTED WITH THIS REPORT OR ANY OF THE DATA AND INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THIS REPORT. Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels, or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purpos es only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only an assessment performed by a qualified environmental professional can provide findings, opinions or conclusions regarding the environmental risk or conditions in, on or at any property. Copyright 2023 by Environmental Data Resources, LLC. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, LLC, or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, LLC or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. 855 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DESCRIPTION Environmental Data Resources, Inc.’s (EDR) City Directory Report is a screening tool designed to assist environmental professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities.EDR’s City Directory Report includes a search of available business directory data at approximately five year intervals. RECORD SOURCES The EDR City Directory Report accesses a variety of business directory sources, including Haines, InfoUSA, Polk,Cole, Bresser, and Stewart. Listings marked as EDR Digital Archive access Cole and InfoUSA records. The various directory sources enhance and complement each other to provide a more thorough and accurate report. EDR is licensed to reproduce certain City Directory works by the copyright holders of those works. The purchaser of this EDR City Directory Report may include it in report(s) delivered to a customer. RESEARCH SUMMARY The following research sources were consulted in the preparation of this report. A check mark indicates where information was identified in the source and provided in this report. Year Target Street Cross Street Source 2020 þ þ EDR Digital Archive 2017 þ þ Cole Information 2014 þ þ Cole Information 2010 þ þ Cole Information 2005 þ ¨Cole Information þ ¨Haines Criss-Cross Directory 2000 ¨¨Cole Information 1995 ¨¨Cole Information 1992 ¨¨Cole Information 1990 ¨¨Haines Criss-Cross Directory 1985 ¨¨Haines Criss-Cross Directory 1980 ¨¨Haines Criss-Cross Directory 1976 ¨¨Haines Criss-Cross Directory 1971 ¨¨Haines Criss-Cross Directory 7449983-5 Page 1 856 FINDINGS TARGET PROPERTY STREET Shadow Ridge Road Palm Desert, CA 92211 Year CD Image Source GERALD FORD DR 2000 -Cole Information Target and Adjoining not listed in Source 1995 -Cole Information Target and Adjoining not listed in Source 1992 -Cole Information Target and Adjoining not listed in Source 1990 -Haines Criss-Cross Directory Street not listed in Source 1985 -Haines Criss-Cross Directory Street not listed in Source 1980 -Haines Criss-Cross Directory Street not listed in Source 1976 -Haines Criss-Cross Directory Street not listed in Source 1971 -Haines Criss-Cross Directory Street not listed in Source SHADOW RIDGE RD 2020 pg A4 EDR Digital Archive 2017 pg A6 Cole Information 2014 pg A8 Cole Information 2010 pg A10 Cole Information 2005 pg A11 Cole Information 2000 -Cole Information Street not listed in Source 1995 -Cole Information Street not listed in Source 1992 -Cole Information Street not listed in Source 1990 -Haines Criss-Cross Directory Street not listed in Source 1985 -Haines Criss-Cross Directory Street not listed in Source 1980 -Haines Criss-Cross Directory Street not listed in Source 1976 -Haines Criss-Cross Directory Street not listed in Source 1971 -Haines Criss-Cross Directory Street not listed in Source 7449983-5 Page 2 857 FINDINGS CROSS STREETS Year CD Image Source GERALD FORD DR 2020 pg. A2 EDR Digital Archive 2017 pg. A5 Cole Information 2014 pg. A7 Cole Information 2010 pg. A9 Cole Information 2005 -Haines Criss-Cross Directory Street not listed in Source 7449983-5 Page 3 858 City Directory Images 859 - GERALD FORD DR EDR Digital Archive 7449983.5 Page: A2 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 2020 73700 CITY OF MESA 73705 DESERT HOT SPRINGS SHERIFF INDIAN WELLS SHERIFF LEAPS OF R I NORTH PALM DESERT SHERIFF PALM DESERT POLICE DEPT RANCHO MIRAGE SHERIFF'S DEPT RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF DEPT 74900 ELECTRIC CHARGING STATION HAMPTON INN-PALM DESERT 74950 AMPM ARCO BLUE RHINO 75000 AMERIGAS PROPANE EXCHANGE ATM CIRCLE K 75030 HUB INTERNATIONAL MILAN INSTITUTE-PALM DESERT 75036 ALEXANDER SWAN DENISE NP DIETZ ANDREW C MD KAISER ONCOLOGY PHARMACY #868 KAISER PERMANENTE KAISER PERMANENTE PALM DESERT KAISER PERMANENTE PANORAMA KAISER PERMANENTE PHARMACY KUON JENNIE PALM DESERT MEDICAL OFFICES PEACEHEALTH MEDICAL GROUP 75046 FOOD COURT AT COOK LLC 75048 A M CASTANEDA INC FOUR SEASONS GLOBAL INC PACIFIC PALM DESERT LLC PALM ROYALE COLLECTIVE 75060 AMBROSIA HEALTHCARE INC FEIRO ENGINEERING INC GERKEN DEEANN A C MSN SUNLITE DEVELOPMENT INC 75108 COACHELLA VALLEY COLLECTION COACHELLA VISTA REALTY FNW LLC KEVAWORKS S B R ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC SKY WATCHER STARGAZING TOURS SOS FIRST INSURANCE SVC CORP 75178 BUG GUYS PEST CONTROL DESERT LIGHTING SOLUTIONS GOLD COAST COMMUNITY MGMT MOUNTAIN PEOPLE READY SUSAN'S BRIGHT IDEAS 860 (Cont'd) - GERALD FORD DR EDR Digital Archive 7449983.5 Page: A3 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 2020 75190 PETRALEA LLC PLANET BINGO 75400 ADVANCED HOME CONNECT-ADT AUTH C3 PALM SPRINGS IT'S JUST LUNCH INTL LLC PREMIER BUSINESS PROPERTIES ROCK CHURCH 75410 DUNCAN BRIDGE CTR GLORIOUS LAND CO LLC NAI CAPITAL COMMERCIAL NEIL DYMOTT FRANK MCFALL TRXLR RBF CONSULTING 75430 AUDIOVISIONS M2 GRAPHICS WESTEC ALARM 75450 AIRWAVE COMMUNICATIONS CORP ALL SEASONS A C PLBG & HTG INC BIMBO BAKERIES USA CBIZ PAYROLL EMPLOYER RESOURCE GROUP & INS 861 - SHADOW RIDGE RD EDR Digital Archive 7449983.5 Page: A4 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 2020 9002 MARRIOTT GOLF ACADEMY 9003 MARRIOTT'S VACATION CLUB 862 - GERALD FORD DR Cole Information 7449983.5 Page: A5 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 2017 705 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE 74900 HAMPTON INN 75000 CIRCLE K 75030 MILAN INSTITUTE WEST COAST TURF 75036 AVAILABLE LOCKSMITH JW DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION KAISER PERMANENTE 75048 AM CASTANEDA INC PACIFIC PALM DESERT LLC 75060 SUNLITE DEVELOPMENT INC 75084 CTAPALM DESERT RRC 75108 COACHELLA VALLEY COLLECTION SERVICE FEIRO ENGINEERING INC 75178 AIRPARK TINT BEST DENTAL TOO DESERT ARCHES DESERT LIGHTING SOLUTIONS GOLD COAST ENTERPRISES LABOR READY LACTOLAND US INC SUSANS BRIGHT IDEAS 75399 ENCLAVE CONDOMINIUM RENTALS 75400 GYMNASTICS ACADEMY THE HOME COMFORT USA KELLY PAPER PREMIER BUSINESS PROPERTIES INC ROCK CHURCH 75410 DUNCAN BRIDGE CENTER NAI CAPITAL COMMERCIAL 75430 AUDIO VISIONS BELAIR PATROL SECURITY TRAINING EXPERTS WESTEC ALARM 75450 CBIZ PAYROLL 863 - SHADOW RIDGE RD Cole Information 7449983.5 Page: A6 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 2017 9003 ATM MARRIOTTS SHADOW RIDGE ITHE VILLAG 864 - GERALD FORD DR Cole Information 7449983.5 Page: A7 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 2014 34400 GOLD COAST ENTERPRISES 74900 HAMPTON INN & SUITES 75000 CIRCLE K 75036 AVAILABLE LOCKSMITH JW DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION 75046 GOODYS CAFE 75048 AM CASTANEDA INC DESERT BEST FRIENDS CLOSET PACIFIC PALM DESERT LLC 75060 FEIRO ENGINEERING INC SUNLITE DEVELOPMENT INC 75084 CTAPALM DESERT RRC 75178 BEST DENTAL TOO DESERT ARCHES DESERT LIGHTING SOLUTION GOLD COAST ENTERPRISES LABOR READY LACTOLAND US INC PALM DESERT PRIME PROPERTIES SUSANS BRIGHT IDEAS 75399 ENCLAVE CONDOMINIUM RENTALS 75400 FASTENAL GYMNASTICS ACADEMY THE HUNSAKER & ASSOCIATES KELLY PAPER PREMIER BUSINESS PROPERTIES INC RICCIARDI ROBERT H ROCK CHURCH 75410 NAI CAPITAL COMMERCIAL 75430 AUDIO VISIONS 865 - SHADOW RIDGE RD Cole Information 7449983.5 Page: A8 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 2014 9003 FCTI MARRIOTTS SHADOW RIDGE II THE ENCL 866 - GERALD FORD DR Cole Information 7449983.5 Page: A9 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 2010 74900 HAMPTON INN 74950 AMPM 75000 ON THE RUN 75030 SANTA BARBARA BUSINESS COLLEGE 75046 GOODYS CAFE 75048 CALIFORNIA TEACHERS ASSN 75084 CALIFORNIA TEACHERS ASSN 75178 BRENTWOOD COMMUNITIES REBATH WALKIN BATHTUBS 75400 FASTENAL CO HUNSAKER & ASSOC KELLY PAPER PREMIER BUSINESS PROPERTIES ROBERT H RICCIARDI & ASSOC ROCK CHURCH & WORLD OUTREACH 75430 AUDIOVISIONS 75450 S & S ICE 867 - SHADOW RIDGE RD Cole Information 7449983.5 Page: A10 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 2010 9002 MARRIOTTSHADOW RIDGE 9003 MARRIOTT 868 - SHADOW RIDGE RD Cole Information 7449983.5 Page: A11 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 2005 7400 MARRIOTT OWNERSHIP RESORTS SUNDT CNSTRSOUTHERN CAL 9000 MARRIOTT VACATION CLUB INTL 9002 MARRIOTT SHADOW RIDGE 9003 MARRIOTT SHDW RIDG MARKETPLACE 869 APPENDIX F Other Documents / Lab Results 870 9/20/23, 2:22 PM GeoTracker https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/map/?CMD=runreport&myaddress=9002+shadow+ridge+road%2C+palm+desert%2C+ca 1/1 Map data ©2023 Imagery ©2023 , Airbus, CNES / Airbus, Maxar Technologies, USDA/FPAC/GEO 100 m Report a map error GeoTracker  Home  Contact UsSearch for a Project Search for an Address  Download Data  Tools LEGEND - CHOOSE MORE SITES LUST Cleanup Sites - REMOVE Cleanup Program Sites - REMOVE Military Cleanup Sites - REMOVE Military Privatized Sites - REMOVE Military UST Sites - REMOVE Signies a Closed Site ACTIVE MAP COVERAGES: • Military Bases -   - REMOVE Sites Shown on Map: 0 Total Sites  0 Open Sites  0 Closed Sites  0 Sites w/Water Quality Data  LIST SITES VISIBLE ON MAP 871 1 Amada Lagunas From:Palm Desert City Clerk <palmdesertca@govqa.us> Sent:Thursday, September 28, 2023 8:34 AM To:Amada Lagunas Subject:Public Records Request :: R000270-092023 --- Please respond above this line --- To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet. RE: Public Records Request of September 20, 2023, Reference # R000270-092023 Dear Amada Lagunas, The City of Palm Desert received a public records request from you on September 20, 2023. Your request mentioned: Hillmann Consulting, LLC is conducting an environmental investigation of the above referenced property. Under the Freedom of Information Act, we would like to request any information your office has regarding these properties including records of violation, complaints etc. If any records are located, we would like to obtain copies or schedule a file review. If no records are available, please contact me to confirm. Thank you for your assistance. Shadow Ridge Rd APN :694320010; 694290010; 694320011; 694290011 The City of Palm Desert has reviewed its files and has determined there are no responsive record(s) to your request. However, if you are searching for records regarding hazardous materials, underground/aboveground storage tank or silo permits contact: RIVERSIDE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH Riverside Office 4065 County Circle Drive, Room 104 Riverside, California 92503 Phone: 951.358.5055 Mailing Address: Post Office Box 7909 Riverside, California 92513-7909 Public Records (rivcoeh.org) For questions or additional information, please reply to this email or call me at (760) 346-0611. This concludes the request. Sincerely, 872 2 M. Gloria Sanchez City Clerk's Office To monitor the progress or update this request please log into the Records Request Portal To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.GovQA logo 873 9/20/23, 2:28 PM RealQuest.com ® - Report https://pro.realquest.com/jsp/report.jsp?&client=&action=confirm&type=getreport&mixedReport=yes&from=mapsubjectsearch&recordno=0&reportoptions=0&1695245314391&1/2 Property Detail Report For Property Located At : ,, CA Owner Information Owner Name:MARRIOTT OWNERSHIP RESORTS INC Mailing Address:1200 BARTOW RD #40, LAKELAND FL 33801-5901 C045 C/O PROP TAX Vesting Codes:/ / Location Information Legal Description:3.21 ACRES IN POR NW 1/4 OF SEC 32 T4S R6E FOR TOTAL DESCRIPTION SEE ASSESSORS MAPS County:RIVERSIDE, CA APN:694-290-010 Census Tract / Block:449.22 / 3 Alternate APN:694-290-010 Township-Range-Sect:4S-6E-32 Subdivision: Legal Book/Page:Map Reference:/ Legal Lot:Tract #: Legal Block:School District:PALM SPRINGS Market Area:322 School District Name:PALM SPRINGS Neighbor Code:Munic/Township:CITY OF PALM DESERT Owner Transfer Information Recording/Sale Date:/Deed Type: Sale Price:1st Mtg Document #: Document #: Last Market Sale Information Recording/Sale Date:/1st Mtg Amount/Type:/ Sale Price: 1st Mtg Int. Rate/Type: / Sale Type:1st Mtg Document #: Document #:2nd Mtg Amount/Type:/ Deed Type:2nd Mtg Int. Rate/Type:/ Transfer Document #:Price Per SqFt: New Construction:Multi/Split Sale: Title Company: Lender: Seller Name: Prior Sale Information Prior Rec/Sale Date:/Prior Lender: Prior Sale Price:Prior 1st Mtg Amt/Type:/ Prior Doc Number:Prior 1st Mtg Rate/Type:/ Prior Deed Type:874 9/20/23, 2:28 PM RealQuest.com ® - Report https://pro.realquest.com/jsp/report.jsp?&client=&action=confirm&type=getreport&mixedReport=yes&from=mapsubjectsearch&recordno=0&reportoptions=0&1695245314391&2/2 Property Characteristics Year Built / Eff:/Total Rooms/Offices Garage Area: Gross Area:Total Restrooms:Garage Capacity: Building Area:Roof Type:Parking Spaces: Tot Adj Area:Roof Material:Heat Type: Above Grade:Construction:Air Cond: # of Stories:Foundation:Pool: Other Improvements:Exterior wall:Quality: Basement Area:Condition: Site Information Zoning:Acres:3.21 County Use:HOMESITE/1-4.9 ACRES (AP7) Lot Area:139,828 Lot Width/Depth:x State Use:R07 Land Use:RESIDENTIAL ACREAGE Res/Comm Units:/Water Type: Site Influence:Sewer Type: Tax Information Total Value:$262,796 Assessed Year:2023 Property Tax:$3,454.08 Land Value:$262,796 Improved %:Tax Area:018333 Improvement Value:Tax Year:2022 Tax Exemption: Total Taxable Value:$262,796 875 9/20/23, 2:30 PM RealQuest.com ® - Report https://pro.realquest.com/jsp/report.jsp?&client=&action=confirm&type=getreport&mixedReport=yes&from=mapsubjectsearch&recordno=0&reportoptions=0&1695245405727&1/2 Property Detail Report For Property Located At : ,, CA Owner Information Owner Name:MARRIOTT OWNERSHIP RESORTS INC Mailing Address:1200 BARTOW RD #40, LAKELAND FL 33801-5901 C045 C/O PROP TAX Vesting Codes:/ / Location Information Legal Description:1.04 ACRES IN POR NW 1/4 OF SEC 32 T4S R6E FOR TOTAL DESCRIPTION SEE ASSESSORS MAPS County:RIVERSIDE, CA APN:694-290-011 Census Tract / Block:449.22 / 3 Alternate APN:694-290-011 Township-Range-Sect:4S-6E-32 Subdivision: Legal Book/Page:Map Reference:/ Legal Lot:Tract #: Legal Block:School District:PALM SPRINGS Market Area:322 School District Name:PALM SPRINGS Neighbor Code:Munic/Township:CITY OF PALM DESERT Owner Transfer Information Recording/Sale Date:/Deed Type: Sale Price:1st Mtg Document #: Document #: Last Market Sale Information Recording/Sale Date:/1st Mtg Amount/Type:/ Sale Price: 1st Mtg Int. Rate/Type: / Sale Type:1st Mtg Document #: Document #:2nd Mtg Amount/Type:/ Deed Type:2nd Mtg Int. Rate/Type:/ Transfer Document #:Price Per SqFt: New Construction:Multi/Split Sale: Title Company: Lender: Seller Name: Prior Sale Information Prior Rec/Sale Date:/Prior Lender: Prior Sale Price:Prior 1st Mtg Amt/Type:/ Prior Doc Number:Prior 1st Mtg Rate/Type:/ Prior Deed Type:876 9/20/23, 2:30 PM RealQuest.com ® - Report https://pro.realquest.com/jsp/report.jsp?&client=&action=confirm&type=getreport&mixedReport=yes&from=mapsubjectsearch&recordno=0&reportoptions=0&1695245405727&2/2 Property Characteristics Year Built / Eff:/Total Rooms/Offices Garage Area: Gross Area:Total Restrooms:Garage Capacity: Building Area:Roof Type:Parking Spaces: Tot Adj Area:Roof Material:Heat Type: Above Grade:Construction:Air Cond: # of Stories:Foundation:Pool: Other Improvements:Exterior wall:Quality: Basement Area:Condition: Site Information Zoning:Acres:1.04 County Use:HOMESITE/1-4.9 ACRES (AP7) Lot Area:45,302 Lot Width/Depth:x State Use:R07 Land Use:RESIDENTIAL ACREAGE Res/Comm Units:/Water Type: Site Influence:Sewer Type: Tax Information Total Value:$85,133 Assessed Year:2023 Property Tax:$1,179.86 Land Value:$85,133 Improved %:Tax Area:018333 Improvement Value:Tax Year:2022 Tax Exemption: Total Taxable Value:$85,133 877 9/20/23, 2:26 PM RealQuest.com ® - Report https://pro.realquest.com/jsp/report.jsp?&action=confirm&type=getreport&recordno=0&reportoptions=0&1695245185827&1695245185827 1/2 Property Detail Report For Property Located At : ,, CA Owner Information Owner Name:MARRIOTT OWNERSHIP RESORTS INC Mailing Address:1200 BARTOW RD #40, LAKELAND FL 33801-5901 C045 C/O PROP TAX Vesting Codes:/ / Location Information Legal Description:3.48 ACRES IN POR NW 1/4 OF SEC 32 T4S R6E FOR TOTAL DESCRIPTION SEE ASSESSORS MAPS County:RIVERSIDE, CA APN:694-320-010 Census Tract / Block:449.22 / 4 Alternate APN:694-320-010 Township-Range-Sect:4S-6E-32 Subdivision: Legal Book/Page:Map Reference:/ Legal Lot:Tract #: Legal Block:School District:PALM SPRINGS Market Area:322 School District Name:PALM SPRINGS Neighbor Code:Munic/Township:CITY OF PALM DESERT Owner Transfer Information Recording/Sale Date:/Deed Type: Sale Price:1st Mtg Document #: Document #: Last Market Sale Information Recording/Sale Date:/1st Mtg Amount/Type:/ Sale Price: 1st Mtg Int. Rate/Type: / Sale Type:1st Mtg Document #: Document #:2nd Mtg Amount/Type:/ Deed Type:2nd Mtg Int. Rate/Type:/ Transfer Document #:Price Per SqFt: New Construction:Multi/Split Sale: Title Company: Lender: Seller Name: Prior Sale Information Prior Rec/Sale Date:/Prior Lender: Prior Sale Price:Prior 1st Mtg Amt/Type:/ Prior Doc Number:Prior 1st Mtg Rate/Type:/ Prior Deed Type:878 9/20/23, 2:26 PM RealQuest.com ® - Report https://pro.realquest.com/jsp/report.jsp?&action=confirm&type=getreport&recordno=0&reportoptions=0&1695245185827&1695245185827 2/2 Property Characteristics Year Built / Eff:/Total Rooms/Offices Garage Area: Gross Area:Total Restrooms:Garage Capacity: Building Area:Roof Type:Parking Spaces: Tot Adj Area:Roof Material:Heat Type: Above Grade:Construction:Air Cond: # of Stories:Foundation:Pool: Other Improvements:Exterior wall:Quality: Basement Area:Condition: Site Information Zoning:Acres:3.48 County Use:HOMESITE/1-4.9 ACRES (AP7) Lot Area:151,589 Lot Width/Depth:x State Use:R07 Land Use:RESIDENTIAL ACREAGE Res/Comm Units:/Water Type: Site Influence:Sewer Type: Tax Information Total Value:$284,902 Assessed Year:2023 Property Tax:$3,736.12 Land Value:$284,902 Improved %:Tax Area:018333 Improvement Value:Tax Year:2022 Tax Exemption: Total Taxable Value:$284,902 879 9/20/23, 2:29 PM RealQuest.com ® - Report https://pro.realquest.com/jsp/report.jsp?&client=&action=confirm&type=getreport&mixedReport=yes&from=mapsubjectsearch&recordno=0&reportoptions=0&1695245356215&1/2 Property Detail Report For Property Located At : ,, CA Owner Information Owner Name:MARRIOTT OWNERSHIP RESORTS INC Mailing Address:1200 BARTOW RD #40, LAKELAND FL 33801-5901 C045 C/O PROP TAX Vesting Codes:/ / Location Information Legal Description:11.01 ACRES IN POR W 1/4 OF SEC 32 T4S R6E FOR TOTAL DESCRIPTION SEE ASSESSORS MAPS County:RIVERSIDE, CA APN:694-320-011 Census Tract / Block:449.22 / 4 Alternate APN:694-320-011 Township-Range-Sect:4S-6E-32 Subdivision: Legal Book/Page:Map Reference:/ Legal Lot:Tract #: Legal Block:School District:PALM SPRINGS Market Area:322 School District Name:PALM SPRINGS Neighbor Code:Munic/Township:CITY OF PALM DESERT Owner Transfer Information Recording/Sale Date:/Deed Type: Sale Price:1st Mtg Document #: Document #: Last Market Sale Information Recording/Sale Date:/1st Mtg Amount/Type:/ Sale Price: 1st Mtg Int. Rate/Type: / Sale Type:1st Mtg Document #: Document #:2nd Mtg Amount/Type:/ Deed Type:2nd Mtg Int. Rate/Type:/ Transfer Document #:Price Per SqFt: New Construction:Multi/Split Sale: Title Company: Lender: Seller Name: Prior Sale Information Prior Rec/Sale Date:/Prior Lender: Prior Sale Price:Prior 1st Mtg Amt/Type:/ Prior Doc Number:Prior 1st Mtg Rate/Type:/ Prior Deed Type:880 9/20/23, 2:29 PM RealQuest.com ® - Report https://pro.realquest.com/jsp/report.jsp?&client=&action=confirm&type=getreport&mixedReport=yes&from=mapsubjectsearch&recordno=0&reportoptions=0&1695245356215&2/2 Property Characteristics Year Built / Eff:/Total Rooms/Offices Garage Area: Gross Area:Total Restrooms:Garage Capacity: Building Area:Roof Type:Parking Spaces: Tot Adj Area:Roof Material:Heat Type: Above Grade:Construction:Air Cond: # of Stories:Foundation:Pool: Other Improvements:Exterior wall:Quality: Basement Area:Condition: Site Information Zoning:Acres:11.01 County Use:HOMESITE/10-49.9 ACRES (A24) Lot Area:479,596 Lot Width/Depth:x State Use:R07 Land Use:RESIDENTIAL ACREAGE Res/Comm Units:/Water Type: Site Influence:Sewer Type: Tax Information Total Value:$901,408 Assessed Year:2023 Property Tax:$11,620.56 Land Value:$901,408 Improved %:Tax Area:018333 Improvement Value:Tax Year:2022 Tax Exemption: Total Taxable Value:$901,408 881 Your Property. Our Priority. 1745 W. Orangewood Avenue, Suite 110, Orange, CA 92868 Telephone (714) 634-9500 Fax: (714) 634-9507 www.HillmannConsulting.com September 20, 2023 Riverside County Fire Department 210 West San Jacinto Avenue Perris, CA 92570 Phone (951) 940-6900 Fax (951) 940-6910 rrurecords@fire.ca.gov RE: Underground Storage Tank/Hazardous Materials Files: Shadow Ridge Road APN: 694320010; 694290010; 694320011 ;694290011 (See map attached) Palm Desert, California 92211 Dear Sir/Madam: Hillmann Consulting, LLC is conducting an environmental investigation of the above referenced property. Under the Freedom of Information Act, we are requesting any information your office has regarding this property. If any records are located, we would like to obtain copies or schedule a file review. If no records are available, please contact me to confirm. Thank you. Sincerely, Amada Lagunas Project Manager Hillmann Consulting, LLC alagunas@hillmannconsulting.com 882 1 Amada Lagunas From:LTrapp@aqmd.gov Sent:Friday, September 29, 2023 11:54 AM To:Amada Lagunas Cc:ob_pr_support_docs@aqmd.gov Subject:SCAQMD Public Records Request# 1421424, -- Rejection Letter Amada Lagunas Hillmann Consulting 1745 Orangewood Ave. Orange, California Ref: Request for Records; Control No. 1421424, Received 9/29/2023 RE: NOV'S & COMPLAINTS FOR APN'S: 694320010; 694290010; 694320011; 694290011. FROM 1/1/1915 - 9/29/2023. The District is unable to process your request as submitted because the record you have requested: Cannot be searched by Tract, Lot or Parcel numbers. Please submit with specifics (i.e. Facility I.D. Number, Facility Name, Facility Address, Permit or Application Number) Should you have any questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me at (909) 396-3700, Tuesday through Friday, between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. Sincerely, Lora Trapp For Colleen Paine Public Records Coordinator Information Management 883 9/20/23, 2:03 PM Well Finder https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/doggr/wellfinder/1/1 CalGEM GIS Unit | Geologic Energy Management Division, California Dep 0.3mi0.3mi0.3mi0.3mi0.3mi 9002 shadow ridge road, pal  Show search results for 9002 sh… 33.780974 -116.381328 Degrees + – Well Finder CalGEM GIS Powered by WellSTAR Information 884 885 ANNUAL REVIEW Your water is our promise. | CVWD.org Water Quality Report provides details about CVWD’s drinking water Pages 2 – 5 CVWD's seven areas of service Pages 6 – 12 2022 – 232022 – 232022 – 23 886 CVWD | 1 Coachella Valley Water District has rebounded from a seesaw year. In 2022, with the state facing another dry year, we needed to help our customers reduce their water use. In spring 2022, we took these steps: • Adopted emergency conservation actions • Implemented drought penalties • Increased turf conversion rebates • Stopped replenishment at the Thomas E. Levy Groundwater Replenishment Facility temporarily to reduce reliance on Colorado River water In spring 2023, some of those decisions eased in response to significant rain and record snow in the state. We expect to have a record year of imported water for replenishment as the State Water Project provided CVWD 100% of its allocation. We have been able to renew our strategic planning process after a two-year hiatus due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Supporting our ongoing water efficiency actions implemented over the years, our efforts continue to reduce demands on the Colorado River, keep the groundwater basin in balance, and implement new conservation strategies. Part of that commitment, and our dedication to transparency, is reflected in this 2022-2023 Annual Review and Water Quality Report. The Domestic Water Quality Summary on pages 2 - 5 provides important information about the high quality of your drinking water. CVWD remains committed to ensuring the reliability and high quality of all our water services. In these pages, we offer a comprehensive overview of CVWD’s seven fields of service. As always, our commitment remains steadfast: Your water is our promise. Sincerely, Jim Barrett 10 10 111 111 86 86S 62 74 LAKE CAHUILLALAKE CAHUILLALAKE CAHUILLA COACHELLA CANAL(123 MILES)COACHELLA CANAL(123 MILES)COACHELLA CANAL(123 MILES) LA QUINTALA QUINTALA QUINTA COACHELLACOACHELLACOACHELLA PALMSPRINGSPALMSPRINGSPALMSPRINGS PALMDESERTPALMDESERTPALMDESERT RANCHOMIRAGERANCHOMIRAGERANCHOMIRAGE CATHEDRALCITYCATHEDRALCITYCATHEDRALCITY DESERTHOTSPRINGS DESERTHOTSPRINGS DESERTHOTSPRINGS INDIANWELLSINDIANWELLSINDIANWELLS SALTON SEA INDIOINDIOINDIO DIVISION 2DIVISION 2DIVISION 2 DIVISION 1DIVISION 1DIVISION 1 DIVISION 3DIVISION 3DIVISION 3 DIVISION 5DIVISION 5DIVISION 5 DIVISION 4DIVISION 4DIVISION 4 BOARD OF DIRECTORS John Powell Jr. Board President | Division Three Cástulo R. Estrada Board Vice President | Division Five John Aguilar | Division One Anthony Bianco | Division Two Peter Nelson | Division Four SENIOR ADMINISTRATION Jim Barrett General Manager Robert Cheng Assistant General Manager Dan Charlton Assistant General Manager Sylvia Bermudez Clerk of the Board DEPARTMENT HEADS Scott Burritt Director of Service & Communication Scott Hunter Director of Human Resources Richard Aragon Director of Finance Luis Maciel Director of Information Systems Carrie Oliphant Director of Engineering MAIN SWITCHBOARD (760) 398-2651 CUSTOMER SERVICE (760) 391-9600 PAYMENT ADDRESS P.O. Box 5000 Coachella, CA 92236 CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS P.O. Box 1058 Coachella, CA 92236 OFFICES 75-515 & 75-525 Hovley Lane East | Palm Desert 51-501 Tyler St. | Coachella ESTABLISHED IN 1918, Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) is a government agency run by a five-member Board of Directors elected to represent the five divisions within CVWD’s service area. The directors serve four-year terms. BOARD MEETINGS are open to the public and generally held on the second and fourth Tuesday of each month at 8 a.m. at District offices. The first meeting of the month is typically held in Palm Desert and the second is held in Coachella. To confirm meeting details, call the District or view the meeting agenda on the website at CVWD.org/BoardAgendas. THE WATER QUALITY REPORT on pages 2 – 5 is mailed to all bill payers who request it (payers within the District’s domestic water boundary who request it in accordance with state law). The Annual Review is produced by CVWD’s Communications staff. MISSION STATEMENT To meet the water-related needs of the people through dedicated employees, providing high-quality water at a reasonable cost. Front Cover Photo: Whitewater River Groundwater Replenishment Facility GENERAL DISTRICT BOUNDARY DIRECTORIAL BOUNDARIES HIGHWAYS COACHELLA CANAL STORMWATER CHANNEL REPLENISHMENT FACILITIES MAP NOT TO SCALE UPDATED 2022 GENERAL MANAGERA MESSAGE FROM CVWD'S Whitewater River 887 CVWD | 32 | CVWD This annual report communicates the results of CVWD’s water quality monitoring. The State Water Resources Control Board Division of Drinking Water (DDW) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) require routine and comprehensive monitoring of CVWD’s drinking water supply. CVWD’S COMMITMENT Coachella Valley Water District is committed to delivering high quality drinking water. Water is delivered to customers from wells drilled into the Coachella Valley’s groundwater basin. Highly trained employees routinely monitor CVWD’s public water systems and collect drinking water samples that are tested at CVWD’s state-certified laboratory. A few specialized tests are performed by other certified laboratories. In addition to the detected constituents listed in the table on pages 4 – 5, CVWD’s Water Quality staff monitors for more than100 other regulated and unregulated chemicals that are not detected during this monitoring. CVWD is governed by a locally elected, five-member board of directors who generally meet in public session at8 a.m., on the second and fourth Tuesdays of each month. Meeting locations rotate between CVWD’s Coachella office at 51-501 Tyler St.and the Steve Robbins Administration Building at 75-515 Hovley Lane Eastin Palm Desert. Call CVWD to confirm meeting time, date and location. SENSITIVE POPULATIONS Some people may be more vulnerable to contaminants in drinking water than the general population. Immuno-compromisedpersons, such as persons with cancer undergoing chemotherapy, persons who have undergone organ transplants, people with HIV/AIDS or other immune system disorders, as well as some elderly, and infants, can be particularly at risk from infections. These people should seek advice about drinking water from their health care providers. USEPA/Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines on appropriatemeans to lessen the risk of infection by Cryptosporidium (a microbial pathogen found in surface water throughout the United States) and other microbial contaminants are available from the Safe Drinking Water Information Hotline at 1-800-426-4791 or epa.gov/ground-water-and-drinking-water. Call the Safe Drinking Water Information Hotline to obtain updated link, if needed. NATURALLY OCCURRING ELEMENTS Arsenic While all of CVWD’s domestic water supply meets state and federal standards for arsenic, drinking water supplied to some service areas does contain low levels of naturally occurring arsenic. The arsenic standard balances the current understanding of arsenic’s possible health effects against the costs of removing arsenic from drinking water. USEPA continues to research the health effects of low levels of arsenic, which is a mineral known to cause cancer in humans at high concentrations and is linked to other health effects, such as skin damage and circulatory problems. All drinking water delivered by CVWD last year complied with the 10 microgram per liter (ug/L) maximum contaminant level (MCL). Radon Radon is a naturally occurring, radioactive gas — a byproduct of uranium — that originates underground but is found in the air. Radon moves from the ground into homes primarily through cracks and holes in their foundations. While most radon enters the home through soil, radon from tap water typically is less than two percent of the radon in indoor air. The USEPA has determined that breathing radon gas increases an individual’s chances of developing lung cancer, and has proposed an MCL of 300 picoCuries per liter (pCi/L) for radon in drinking water. This proposed standard is far less than the 4,000 pCi/L in water that is equivalent to the radon level found in outdoor air. The radon level in CVWD wells ranges from none detected to 400 pCi/L, significantly lower than that found in the air you breathe. POTENTIAL CONTAMINANTS About Nitrate Nitrate (as nitrogen) in drinking water at levels above 10 milligrams per liter (mg/L) is a health risk for infants younger than six months. High nitrate levels in drinking water can interfere with the capacity of the infant’s blood to carry oxygen, resulting in serious illness; symptoms include shortness of breath and blueness of skin. Nitrate (as nitrogen) in drinking water levels above 10 milligrams per liter (mg/L) may also affect the ability of blood to carry oxygen in other individuals, such as pregnant women and those with certain enzyme deficiencies. If you are caring for an infant or you are pregnant, you should ask for advice from your health care provider. Wells that confirm with nitrate levels (as nitrogen) above 10 mg/L are removed from service. ABOUT LEAD If present, elevated levels of lead can cause serious health problems, especially for pregnant women and young children. Lead in drinking water is primarily from materials and components associated with service lines and home plumbing. Responsibility CVWD is responsible for providing high-quality drinking water, but cannot control the variety of materials used in customer plumbing components. Tip When your water has been sitting for several hours, you can minimize the potential for lead exposure by flushing your tap for 30 seconds before using water for drinking or cooking. You can capture this flushed water in a container and use it for watering plants. Resource Information If you are concerned about lead in your water, you may wish to have your water tested. Information on lead in drinking water, testing methods, and steps you can take to minimize exposure is available from the Safe Drinking Water Information Hotline (1-800-426-4791) or at epa.gov/lead. As noted, all drinking water served by CVWD comes from groundwater wells. DDW requires water agencies to state: “the sources of drinking water (both tap water and bottled water) include rivers, lakes, streams, ponds, reservoirs, springs, and wells. As water travels over the surface of the land or through the ground, it dissolves naturally occurring minerals and, in some cases, radioactive material, and can pick up substances resulting from the presence of animals or from human activity.” CONTAMINANTS THAT MAY BE PRESENT IN SOURCE WATER INCLUDE: Microbial contaminants, such as viruses and bacteria, that may come from sewage treatment plants, septic systems, agricultural livestock operations and wildlife. Inorganic contaminants, such as salts and metals, that can be naturally occurring or result from urban stormwater runoff, industrial or domestic wastewater discharges, oil and gas production, mining or farming. Pesticides and herbicides that may come from a variety of sources, such as agriculture, urban stormwater runoff, and residential uses. Organic chemical contaminants, including synthetic and volatile organic chemicals, that are byproducts of industrial processes and petroleum production, and can also come from gas stations, urban stormwater runoff, and septic systems. Radioactive contaminants that can be naturally occurring or be the result of oil and gas production and mining activities. In order to ensure that tap water is safe to drink, USEPA and DDW prescribe regulations that limit the amount of certain contaminants in water provided by public water systems. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration regulations and California law also establish limitsfor contaminants in bottled water that must provide the same protectionfor public health. “Drinking water, including bottled water, may reasonably be expected to containat least small amounts of some contaminants. The presence of contaminants does not necessarily indicate that water poses a health risk. More information about contaminants and potential health effects can be obtained by calling the USEPA’s Safe Drinking Water Information Hotline (1-800-426-4791) or the National Radon Hotline (1-800-767-7236).” Additionally, the USEPA’s health advisories tables are available atepa.gov/dwstandardsregulations/2018-drinking-water-standards-and-advisory-tables. DRINKING WATER SOURCEWATER ASSESSMENTS: CVWD has conducted source water assessments that provide information about the vulnerability of CVWD wells to contamination. In 2002, CVWD completed a comprehensive source water assessment that evaluated all groundwater wells supplying the CVWD’s six public water systems. An assessment is performed on each new well added to CVWD’s system. Groundwater from these CVWD wellsis considered vulnerable to activities associated with urban and agricultural uses. Urban land uses include the following activities: known contaminant plumes, dry cleaners, underground storage tanks, septic systems, automobile gas stations (including historic), automobile repair shops, historic waste dumps/landfills, illegal/unauthorized dumping, sewer collection systems, and utility stations’ maintenance areas. Agricultural land uses include the following activities: irrigation/agricultural wells, irrigated crops, pesticide/fertilizer/petroleum, and transfer areas. The following activities have been associated with detected contaminants: known contaminant plumes, dry cleaners, and irrigated crops. CVWD is committed to supplying high-quality drinking water from CVWD’s wells to our communities. DEFINITIONS & ABBREVIATIONS AL or Regulatory Action LevelThe concentration of a contaminant which, if exceeded, triggers treatment or other requirements which a water system must follow. MCL or Maximum Contaminant Level The highest level of a contaminant that is allowed in drinking water. Primary MCLs are set as close topublic health goals or maximum contaminant levelgoals as economically and technologically feasible.Secondary MCLs are set to protect the odor, taste, and appearance of drinking water. MCLG or Maximum Contaminant Level GoalLevel of a contaminant in drinking water below which there is no known or expected risk to health. MCLGs are set by the U.S.Environmental Protection Agency. mg/L — Milligrams per liter (parts per million or ppm) One mg/L is equivalent to 1 second in 11.5 days. MRDL or Maximum Residual DisinfectantLevelThe highest level of a disinfectant allowed in drinking water. There is convincing evidence that addition of a disinfectant is necessary for control of microbial contaminants. MRDLG or Maximum Residual Disinfectant Level GoalThe level of a drinking water disinfectant below which there is no known or expected risk to health. MRDLGs do not reflect the benefits of the use of disinfectants to control microbial contaminants. N/A — Not applicableThe government has not set a Public Health Goal, Maximum Contaminant Level Goal or Maximum Contaminant Level for this substance. ND — None detected ng/L — Nanograms per liter (parts per trillion or ppt)One ng/L is equivalent to 1 second in32,000 years. NL or Notification Level Health based advisory level established by the DDW for chemicals in drinking water that lack maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) as stated by DDW. NTU — Nephelometric turbidity units Measurement of suspended material pCi/L — picoCuries per literFor uranium, one pCi/L is equivalent to1 second in 21 years. PDWS or Primary Drinking Water StandardMCLs and MRDLs for contaminants that affecthealth, along with their monitoring and reporting requirements, and water treatment requirement. PHG or Public Health GoalLevel of a contaminant in drinking water below which there is no known or expected risk to health. Public Health Goals are set by the California Environmental Protection Agency. ug/L—Micrograms per liter (parts per billion or ppm)One ug/L is equivalent to 1 second in 32 years. uS/cm — Microsiemens per centimeter 3888 CVWD | 54 WHAT’S IN MY WATER? CVWD analyzed more than 16,000 water samples last year to monitor the water quality of drinking water delivered to its customers. Every year, CVWD is required to analyze a select number of these samples for more than 100 regulated and unregulated substances. This table lists those substances that were detected in CVWD’s two service areas. Dark grey boxes indicate the substance was not detected (ND), existing data is no longer reportable, or there is no available data. The data on the chart summarizes results of the most recent monitoring completed between 2013 and 2022. CVWD did not have any Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) violations in 2022. TO READ THIS TABLE: First, determine your service area by referring to footnotes 2 and 3 on the opposite page. Then move down the corresponding column, comparing the detection level of each chemical or other contaminant with the Public Health Goal (PHG), Maximum Contaminant Level Goal (MCLG) and MCL. For example, if you live in La Quinta and want to know the level of fluoride detected in your service area, you would look down the Cove Communities column and stop at the fluoride row. The average fluoride level in that service area is 0.6 mg/L with the range of results varying from 0.13 mg/L to 1.0 mg/L. Compare these values to the MCL in the third column. Fluoride levels in this water comply with the MCL of 2.0 mg/L. The range can show a level above the MCL and still comply with the drinking water standard when compliance is based on average levels found in each water source or water system. FOOTNOTES: (1) Values with this footnote have fixed Secondary MCLs, remaining values are Primary MCLs unless identified otherwise. (2) Cove Communities includes the communities of Rancho Mirage, Thousand Palms, Palm Desert, Indian Wells, La Quinta, Mecca, Bombay Beach, North Shore, Hot Mineral Spa; and portions of Bermuda Dunes, Cathedral City, Indio, Oasis, Riverside County, Thermal, Valerie Jean, Desert Shores, Salton Sea Beach and Salton City. (3) ID No. 8 includes the communities of Indio Hills, Sky Valley; and select areas within and adjacent to Desert Hot Springs. (4) This constituent is monitored for aesthetics such as taste and odor. A fixed consumer acceptance contaminant level has not been established for this constituent. (5) The reported average represents the highest running annual average based on distribution monitoring. (6) Although an individual result may exceed the MCL, compliance is determined by using a running annual average. (7) California's Chromium-6 drinking water MCL became effective on July 1, 2014. The Cr6 MCL was invalidated and withdrawn in 2017. (8) The reported values are 90th percentile levels for samples collected from faucets in water user homes. (9) The reported average represents the highest locational running annual average (LRAA), based on distribution system monitoring. (10) Systems that collect 40 or more samples per month (Cove Communities): 5.0% of monthly samples are positive. Systems that collect less than 40 samples per month (ID No. 8): 1 positive monthly sample. (11) All water systems are required to comply with the California Total Coliform Rule and the Federal Revised Total Coliform Rule. The USEPA anticipates greater public health protection as the new rule requires water systems that are vulnerable to microbial contamination to identify and fix problems. (12) In 2020, USEPA required unregulated contaminant monitoring (identified as UCMR4) for select CVWD domestic facilities in Cove Communities. (13) Unregulated contaminants are those for which USEPA and DDW have not established drinking water standards. The purpose of unregulated contaminant monitoring is to assist both regulatory agencies in determining the occurrence of unregulated contaminants in drinking water and whether further regulation is warranted. (14) Results from 2020 unregulated contaminant monitoring rule (UCMR4) testing for six Haloacetic Acids (HAABr6). CVWD performed this monitoring at select CVWD domestic facilities in Cove Communities. (15) Results from 2020 unregulated contaminant monitoring rule (UCMR4) testing for nine Haloacetic Acids (HAA9). CVWD performed this monitoring at select CVWD domestic facilities in Cove Communities. MORE INFORMATION: To receive a summary of CVWD’s source water assessments or additional water quality data or clarification, call CVWD’s Water Quality Division at (760) 398-2651. Complete copies of source water assessments may be viewed at CVWD’s office at 75-525 Hovley Lane East, Palm Desert, CA 92211. Este informe contiene información muy importante sobre su agua potable. Tradúzcalo ó hable con alguien que lo entienda bien. También puede llamar al CVWD al número de teléfono (760) 398-2651 ó vaya aCVWD.org/informeanual2023. Note: Above statement fulfills California Code of Regulations’ requirement insection 64481(I). K:\COMMLEGI\Andrea\Publicaons\AnnualReview\2023\CCR Content\2023 DWQ Summary Table Final 20230329.xlsx Page 1 of 1 DET ECT ED PARAMET ER, UNITS PHG or (MCLG)MCL(1) COVE COMMUNITIES(2) RANGE (AVERAGE) ID NO. 8(3) RANGE (AVERAGE) MCL VIOLATION? (YES/NO) MAJOR SOURCE(S) Arsenic, µg/L 0.004 10 ND-11(6) (ND)No Erosion of natural deposits Barium, mg/L 2 1 ND-0.11 (ND)No Erosion of natural deposits Chloride, mg/L N/A 500;600(1,4)6.3-120 (21)11-31 (17)No Leaching from natural deposits Chlorine (as Cl2), mg/L(5)MRDLG=4 MRDL=4.0 ND-1.9 (0.6)0.1-1.4 (0.9)No Result of drinking water chlorination Chromium, µg/L (100)50 ND-21 (ND)13-22 (17)No Erosion of natural deposits Chromium-6, µg/L(7)0.02 N/A ND-22 (8.5)14-23 (18)No Erosion of natural deposits Copper, mg/L(8) [homes tested/sites exceeding AL]0.3 AL=1.3 0.11 [55/0] 0.10 [21/0]No Internal corrosion of household plumbing Dibromochloropropane (DBCP), ng/L 3 200 ND-50 (ND)No Leaching of banned nematocide which may still be present in soils Fluoride, mg/L 1 2.0 0.13-1.0 (0.6)0.4-0.6 (0.5)No Erosion of natural deposits Gross Alpha Particle Activity (excluding Uranium), pCi/L (0)15 ND-5.4 (ND)ND-4.6 (ND)No Erosion of natural deposits Hardness (as CaCO3), mg/L 7.6-310 (120)72-240 (150)No Erosion of natural deposits Nitrate (as Nitrogen), mg/L 10 10 ND-9.0 (1.1)0.4-0.9 (0.6)No Leaching of fertilizer, animal wastes or natural deposits Odor as threshold, units N/A 3(1)ND-2 (ND)No Naturally occurring organic materials pH, units 6.8-9.1 (7.9)7.6-8.1 (7.8)No Physical characteristic Radium 228, pCi/L 0.019 5 ND-1.2 (ND)No Erosion of natural deposits Sodium, mg/L 18-110 (30)54-89 (70)No Erosion of natural deposits Specific Conductance, µS/cm N/A 1,600;2,200(1,4)240-1,100 (400)530-880 (640)No Substances that form ions when in water Sulfate, mg/L N/A 500;600(1,4)ND-260 (51)140-260 (180)No Leaching from natural deposits Total Coliform Bacteria, positive samples/month (0)5% or 1(10, 11) ND-1.3% (ND)No Naturally present in the environment Total Dissolved Solids, mg/L N/A 1,000;1,500(1,4)130-720 (250)340-610 (430)No Leaching from natural deposits Total Trihalomethanes, µg/L(9)N/A 80 ND-14 (10)1.3-17 (9.2)No By-product of drinking water chlorination Turbidity, NTU N/A 5(1)ND-0.5 (ND)ND-0.11 (ND)No Leaching from natural deposits Uranium, pCi/L 0.43 20 ND-13 (5.2) 2.1-6.1 (4.1)No Erosion of natural deposits Zinc, mg/L N/A 5.0(1)ND-0.4 (ND)No Leaching from natural deposits Bromide, µg/L(13)25-160 (58)No Erosion of natural deposits Germanium, µg/L(13)ND-0.35 (ND)No Erosion of natural deposits Haloacetic Acids (HAA6Br), µg/L(13, 14)ND-9.4 (1.7)No By-product of drinking water chlorination Haloacetic Acids (HAA9), µg/L(13, 15)ND-18 (2.9)No By-product of drinking water chlorination Manganese, µg/L N/A 50(1)ND-1.6 (ND)No Erosion of natural deposits (11) All water systems are required to comply with the California Total Coliform Rule and the Federal Revised Total Coliform Rule. The USEPA anticipates greater public health protection as the new rule requires water systems that are vulnerable to microbial contamination to identify and fix problems. (12) In 2020, USEPA required unregulated contaminant monitoring (identified as UCMR4) for select CVW D domestic facilities in Cove Communities. (13) Unregulated contaminants are those for which USEPA and DDW have not established drinking water standards. The purpose of unregulated contaminant monitoring is to assist both regulatory agencies in determining the occurrence of unregulated contaminants in drinking water and whether further regulation is warranted. (14) Results from 2020 unregulated contaminant monitoring rule (UCMR4) testing for six Haloacetic Acids (HAABr6). CVW D performed this monitoring at select CVW D domestic facilities in Cove Communities. (15) Results from 2020 unregulated contaminant monitoring rule (UCMR4) testing for nine Haloacetic Acids (HAA9). CVW D performed this monitoring at select CVW D domestic facilities in Cove Communities. CVW D 2023 Domestic W ater Quality Summary (Covering the reporting period January - December 2022) N/A N/A N/A 2020 UNREGULATED CONTAMINANT MONITORING(12) N/A N/A N/A N/A FOOTNOTES: (5) The reported average represents the highest running annual average based on distribution monitoring.(10) Systems that collect 40 or more samples per month (Cove Communities): 5.0% of monthly samples are positive. Systems that collect less than 40 samples per month (ID No. 8): 1 positive monthly sample. (2) Cove Communities includes the communities of Rancho Mirage, Thousand Palms, Palm Desert, Indian W ells, La Quinta, Mecca, Bombay Beach, North Shore, Hot Mineral Spa; and portions of Bermuda Dunes, Cathedral City, Indio, Oasis, Riverside County, Thermal, Valerie Jean, Desert Shores, Salton Sea Beach and Salton City. (7) California's Chromium-6 drinking water MCL became effective on July 1, 2014. The Cr6 MCL was invalidated and withdrawn in 2017. (3) ID No. 8 includes the communities of Indio Hills, Sky Valley; and select areas within and adjacent to Desert Hot Springs. (8) The reported values are 90th percentile levels for samples collected from faucets in water user homes. (4) This constituent is monitored for aesthetics such as taste and odor. A fixed consumer acceptance contaminant level has not been established for this constituent. (9))The reported average represents the highest locational running annual average (LRAA) based on distribution system monitoring. 889 7 CVWD’s decades of water management have led to successful increases in groundwater levels. Local water-efficient practices remain a priority. Since 2002, CVWD has developed several long- term planning documents that guide managing valley water resources, including a five-year drought risk assessment and a water shortage contingency plan. Other top issues addressed include water demand projections, seismic risk assessment. and extreme weather assessment. CVWD’s Water Management team works closely with customers to help them become more efficient water users. Conservation programs focus on promoting efficient outdoor water use, since nearly 70% of residential water is used outdoors. Programs include landscape and irrigation rebates, free installation of smart irrigation controllers, free indoor conservation kits for homeowners, and free water brooms and pre- rinse nozzles for commercial customers and homeowner associations. The team also provides on-site conservation reviews or audits to evaluate water use and offers suggestions to improve water use efficiency to meet assigned water budgets. 1. Increased turf conversion rebate from $2/sq.ft. to $3/sq.ft. and collaborated with local cities to contribute matching funds to CVWD customers. Customer participation saw a 326% increase in square feet of turf removed in the first quarter of FY23, compared to the same period in FY22. As of May 2023, the rebate is $2 per square foot. 2. Implemented all water shortage contingency plan Stage 2 demand reduction actions, including reducing outdoor water budgets by 10%, initiating drought penalties and creating procedures to prohibit irrigating nonfunctional turf. Stage 2 is no longer in place. 2022 ACCOMPLISHMENTS CVWD AND CUSTOMERS HAVE CHAMPIONED CONSERVATION PRACTICES 1. CVWD has invested more than $19.5 million since July 2020 to fund rebate and incentive programs supporting permanent water-use reductions. 2. Customers reduced water consumption in 2022 by 13% compared to 2013, a reduction of more than 4.8 billion gallons of water. 3. Customers have converted 23.5 million square- feet of grass to desert-friendly landscaping, saving about 29,195 acre-feet of water since 2009. 4. HOA and commercial customers have converted to drip irrigation systems on more than 1.3 million square-feet of irrigated landscape since 2017. 5. More than 13,000 customers have received rebates for outdoor conservation programs. CONSERVATION Big Rock Golf Course at Indian Springs, Indio. Agriculture is the second largest contributor to the local economy, contributing about $575 million annually and creating roughly 12,000 jobs. Coachella Valley Water District delivers about 260,000 acre-feet of Colorado River water to 77,000 acres of farmland, including double cropping. CVWD imports water through the 123 mile-long Coachella Canal, a branch of the All-American Canal. Irrigation water is delivered through an underground pipeline system built in the 1950s. In 2022, CVWD secured a low-interest federal loan from the Bureau of Reclamation, funded by the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, to replace the 70-year- old aging infrastructure. The irrigation laterals include old, large-diameter concrete pipelines experiencing numerous leaks. The box structures being replaced serve as a point to divert large flow volumes to the various laterals and are at the union of multiple pipelines. AGRICULTURAL IRRIGATION CONSERVATION& Sweet corn THE FIRST PHASE OF THE PROJECT INCLUDES: • 8 irrigation lateral transmission mains, including replacing 15 miles of pipeline serving approximately 7,420 acres of farmland. • 3 division box structure replacements that divide the flow between transmission mainline and lateral pipelines. The division box structures serve together approximately 22,300 acres of farmland. • Replacement of the pipelines increases operational efficiency, improves reliability, enhances water conservation, and improves customer service. EVERY DROP COUNTS Understanding the necessity for conservation, CVWD has implemented these significant actions to reduce water demand and protect water supplies: • Investment in its 500-mile irrigation pipeline delivery system to minimize system losses and metering 100% of properties served, resulting in a 5% system loss, which is low compared to industry standards. • In 1980, the 49 southern miles of the canal were lined, saving more than 132,000 acre-feet of water per year. • Lining the remaining 35-mile section of Coachella Canal in 2006, with San Diego County Water Authority and the San Luis Rey Band of Indians, saves another 26,000 acre-feet annually. • In addition, conservation by customers is necessary to continue successful water management. More than 60% of agricultural customers use drip irrigation, which allows crops to be irrigated efficiently, making valley farmers some of the state’s most efficient agricultural water users. 7 TOP CROPS Dates, Grapes, Bell Peppers, Hemp, Lemon-Lime, Lettuce, and Carrots OTHER LEADING CROPS Artichoke, Sweet Corn, Oriental Vegetables, Cauliflower, Cabbage, Turf Grass, Orange- Tangerine, Broccoli, Okra, Celery, Spinach, Green Bean, Tomatoes, and Strawberries CVWD | 7890 CVWD | 98 | CVWD The Coachella Valley’s annual average rainfall of three inches, along with snowmelt from surrounding mountains, is not nearly enough to replenish the groundwater pumped from the local groundwater basin to meet water needs. To augment the Valley’s water supply, CVWD receives Colorado River water from the Coachella Canal and through exchange of its State Water Project (SWP) allotment. CVWD’s federally contracted supply of Colorado River water is 444,000 acre-feet for 2023. Together Desert Water Agency and CVWD are contracted to receive 194,100 acre- feet per year of State Water Project water. The two Districts receive SWP water through an exchange of Colorado River water with Metropolitan Water District of Southern California. This exchange saves CVWD and DWA from building an estimated multi-billion dollar pipeline to receive SWP water from Northern California. CVWD and Desert Water Agency have worked for decades to eliminate groundwater overdraft through a successful replenishment program and by implementing water management practices that protect supplies for future generations. 2021 and 2022 were among the driest periods in the state’s history, meaning agencies only received 5% of their SWP water supply. Due to significant winter and spring storms, CVWD and DWA are set to receive 100% of their SWP water supply in 2023. The water will be stored in the groundwater basin throughout the year. Three CVWD initiatives have been most effective in improving groundwater conditions: • Budget-based, tiered water rates that contribute to conservation • Colorado River water use through the Mid-Valley Pipeline has reduced groundwater pumping • Replenishing the aquifer at four sites 1. Whitewater River Groundwater Replenishment Facility 2. Mission Creek Groundwater Replenishment Facility 3. Thomas E. Levy Groundwater Replenishment Facility 4. Palm Desert Groundwater Replenishment Facility, Phase I GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT IMPORTED WATER BY THE NUMBERS ACRE-FEET of imported water has been replenished into the aquifer since 1973 at three facilities. 4.56 MILLION of the Coachella Valley’s domestic water supply is GROUNDWATER . 99% ACRE-FEET of water is enough to serve the water needs of families of four in one year. 3 MILLION 6 MILLION 53,953 ACRE-FEET of water was replenished in 2022. Whitewater River Groundwater Replenishment Facility DOMESTIC WATER CVWD is the largest provider of drinking water in the Coachella Valley. That water comes from wells drilled into natural aquifers in the District’s service area (1,000 square miles) stretching from Palm Springs to Salton Sea communities. The aquifers are filled with water, sand, gravel, and clay sediments. Natural layers of these sediments help to filter and protect groundwater served to Coachella Valley communities. Wells pump water into pipes for on-demand delivery to customers. Water that is not immediately used is stored in reservoirs located in secured sites primarily in elevated locations. This allows gravity to provide water pressure. That groundwater requires no or minimal treatment to meet state and federal water quality standards. Employees collect more than 16,000 water samples per year to test for more than 100 regulated and unregulated substances. The District’s state-certified laboratory performs some of the tests while other samples are sent to contracted laboratories. CVWD’s Domestic Water Division oversees daily operations, maintenance and repair of the domestic water system to ensure supply meets demand, pressures are adequate and deliveries comply with water quality standards. Domestic water rates paid by customers offset the costs of providing customer service, operating wells and reservoirs, maintaining pipelines, and replenishing aquifers. As a public water provider, CVWD can only charge its customers for the costs associated with providing water service. The District cannot earn a profit. 2022 SERVICE INFORMATION POPULATION SERVED: ACTIVE ACCOUNTS: AVERAGE DAILY DEMAND: TOTAL WATER DELIVERED: 270,000 81.4 million gallons per day 91,230acre-feet 113,481 2022 SYSTEM INFORMATION ACTIVE WELLS: 94 DAILY WELL PUMP CAPACITY: WATER RESERVOIRS: STORAGE CAPACITY: DISTRIBUTION PIPELINE SYSTEM: 237million gallons per day 171.7 million gallons 2,043miles 67 CVWD's Water Quality Lab in Palm Desert 891 1110 | CVWD Increasing the supply and use of nonpotable water is a key component of CVWD’s long-range water management plans that emphasize conservation, groundwater replenishment, as well as using recycled and imported water for golf, farm, and large landscape irrigation. CVWD collects wastewater from homes and businesses for an advanced multi-step treatment process at two of five wastewater reclamation plants. About 5.47 billion gallons of wastewater are recycled every year using a process that disinfects and filters solids, organic materials, chemicals, and germs. The treated water is approved for 43 beneficial uses including golf course, landscape, and agricultural irrigation. Employees collect and test recycled water samples every day to ensure a safe and beneficial water source. The Mid-Valley Pipeline delivers Coachella Canal water to CVWD’s wastewater reclamation plant in Palm Desert. That system supplements the recycled water supply and allows CVWD to meet the year-round irrigation demand of nonpotable water customers instead of pumping groundwater. In 2022, CVWD delivered 24,533 acre-feet of nonpotable water (including 10,389 acre-feet of recycled water) to nonpotable water customers in the Mid-Valley area. CVWD continues to connect more golf courses each year. The recent nonpotable pipeline expansion project adds four more golf courses including Bermuda Dunes Country Club, Oasis Country Club, Palm Desert Resort Country Club, and Woodhaven Country Club. NONPOTABLE RECYCLED WATER within CVWD boundaries BY THE NUMBERS OUT OF 106 use a nonpotablewater source 54.5 GOLF COURSES use a nonpotable blend of RECYCLED WATER & COLORADO RIVER WATER for irrigation 17.5 GOLF COURSES use ALL COLORADO RIVER WATER from the Coachella Canal or the Mid-Valley Pipeline 36 GOLF COURSES PLAN TO SWITCH from groundwater to nonpotable water in the future 40.5 GOLF COURSES of NONPOTABLE WATER was used in 2022, making the same amount of groundwater available for drinking and other potable purposes 44,034 ACRE-FEET Nonpotable water pipeline connection along East Hovley Lane in Palm Desert FLOOD CONTROL STORMWATER PROTECTION FLOOD CONTROL While the Coachella Valley desert region averages about 3 inches of rain per year, the surrounding mountains are subject to higher rainfall rates. That can result in unpredictable, damaging flash flooding throughout the Valley. Through approximately 169 miles of storm channels, CVWD protects 590 square miles of the Coachella Valley from flooding. The channels convey floodwaters produced by rain and snowmelt from mountain runoff, along with local drainage from the developed and undeveloped lands within cities and the county. Along with the channels, a number of dikes and levees collect flowing floodwater as it pours from mountains onto the Valley floor. The largest of the dike systems collect floodwater runoff along the eastern side of the Coachella Valley. The remainder of the dike systems are mostly located in the Cove Communities. CVWD is responsible for most flood control facilities, but responsibility for streets, bridges, and related infrastructure rests with other levels of government, such as counties and cities. A multi-year project currently under construction will add a 2.5-mile-long series of concrete flood control channels in North Indio that will connect to the Coachella Valley Stormwater Channel. By removing about 2,700 acres of land from a designated Special Flood Hazard Area, FEMA will no longer require residents in this area to carry mandatory flood insurance, once FEMA approves new flood maps. STORMWATER PROTECTION The backbone of the stormwater protection system is the 50-mile-long Whitewater River/Coachella Valley Stormwater Channel. It carries flows from the Whitewater area north of Palm Springs to the Salton Sea. The western half of the channel runs along an alignment until approximately Point Happy in La Quinta. From there, the channel allows the storm flows to continue to the Salton Sea. As the Valley grew, many streets were built to cross the channel. These crossings were intended to provide access for traffic during dry periods. Some cities have invested in bridges to replace these “low water” crossings. In addition, areas previously overlooked as grassy, low-lying neighborhood lots, suddenly fulfill their original design as retention basins. The entire system includes 169 miles of channels and associated facilities built along the natural alignment of dry washes that carry floodwater from the surrounding mountains to the Valley floor. Coachella Valley Stormwater Improvement Project 892 1312 | CVWD SERVICE INFORMATION Population Served 270,000 Active Accounts 1 113,481 Average Daily Demand 81.4 MGD Total Water Delivered 91,230 AF SYSTEM INFORMATION Active Wells 94 Total Daily Well Pumping Capacity 237 MGD Distribution Reservoirs 67 Storage Capacity 171.7 MG Distribution Piping System 2,043 Miles DOMESTIC (DRINKING) WATER SERVICE INFORMATION Service Area 381,479 acres SYSTEM INFORMATION Stormwater Channels 18 Length of Whitewater River/ 50 MilesCoachella Stormwater Channel Length of all Regional 169 MilesFlood Protection Facilities STORMWATER PROTECTION Replenishment facilities 4 Replenishment from 53,953 AFimported water Imported supply since 4,562,483 AF1973 through 2022 GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT In cooperation with Desert Water Agency Total on-farm drains 2,298 Miles Acreage with farm drains 37,425 Acres District open drains 21 Miles District pipe drains 166 Miles AGRICULTURAL DRAINAGE SERVICE INFORMATION Active Accounts 24 Average Daily Flow 18 MGD Total Blended & MVP Water Supplied: 22 MGD SYSTEM INFORMATION Wastewater Reclamation Plants 2 Total Daily Tertiary Capacity 17.5 MGD Distribution Piping System 37 Miles BLENDED, MVP, RECYCLED WATER 2 SERVICE INFORMATION Irrigable Acres for Service 77,121 Active Accounts 1,348 Total Water Delivered 314,978 AF Average Daily Demand 863 AF Maximum Daily Demand 1,470 AF SYSTEM INFORMATION Reservoirs 2 Storage Capacity 1,361 AF Distribution System 485 Miles Pumping Plants 16 Length of Canal 123 Miles CANAL WATER 1 The number of active service connections excludes fire service. 2 Blended: Recycled water blended with Colorado River water MVP: Colorado River water accessed from the Mid-Valley Pipeline Recycled: Reclaimed wastewater from Wastewater Reclamation Plants 7 and 10 SERVICE INFORMATION Population Served 245,000 Active Accounts 103,616 Average Daily Flow 17.05 MGD SYSTEM INFORMATION Wastewater Reclamation Plants 5 Total Daily Plant Capacity 33.1 MGD Collection Piping System 1,170 Miles WASTE WATER MG: Million gallons | MGD: Million gallons per day | AF: Acre-feet BY THENUMBERS 568 full-time & 2 part-time employees budgeted as of 6/30/2023 $78,489,300,953 Combined assessed valuation for property within the CVWD service boundaries as of 6/30/2023 Most CVWD domestic water customers also receive sewer services from the District. The system treated 6.2 billion gallons of wastewater in 2022. The District has the capacity to increase its wastewater treatment as the Coachella Valley’s population grows. About 5.47 billion gallons of collected wastewater is recycled for irrigation on golf courses and other large landscapes. To ensure sewer services for customers, CVWD cleans up to 232 miles of sewer lines every year and inspects up to 71 miles of sewer lines by video per year to prevent leaks and spills. In addition, crews inspect approximately 4,600 manholes every year. The District owns and operates 1,170 miles of pipeline that conveys wastewater to one of five wastewater reclamation plants for treatment. Two of those plants treat wastewater to meet state standards for nonpotable water, which is used by customers for irrigation. Every gallon of recycled water used for outdoor irrigation saves groundwater for potable use by domestic customers. Increasing the supply and use of recycled water is a key component of CVWD’s long-range water management plans. Learn more at cvwd.org/163/Wastewater-Treatment FATS, OILS, GREASE “FLUSHABLE” WIPES, COTTON PADS & SWABS, FACIAL TISSUES PAPER TOWELS COFFEE GRINDS& EGGSHELLS MEDICATIONS HOUSEHOLD CHEMICALS, PAINT, CEMENT, STUCCO OR POOL GROUT SEWER SERVICE WASTEWATER To help keep sewer systems flowing, please DO NOT FLUSH these items or put them down the drain: SYSTEM INFORMATION Total daily plant capacity33.1 MILLION GALLONS collect and transport wastewater to thenearest wastewater reclamation facility LIFT STATIONS27 AVERAGEDAILY FLOW17.05 MILLION GALLONSPER DAY POPULATIONSERVED245,000 Water Reclamation Plant 10 893 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT P.O. Box 1058 Coachella, CA 92236 (760) 398-2651 | cvwd.org PAYING YOUR BILL Payment methods: Visa, MasterCard, American Express, Discover, checking/savings accounts, Amazon Pay, PayPal, and Venmo payments are accepted. Electronic notification when bill is due: Save paper by enrolling in our electronic notification program and be notified by e-mail when your new bill is available to view online. To submit your request online, please visit the Pay My Bill section at CVWD.org. Automatic electronic payment: Your monthly payment can be automatically deducted from your checking account. To submit your request online, please visit the Pay My Bill section at CVWD.org. Should you have any questions, call Customer Service at (760) 391-9600. Online with a credit card: Customers can view bills and pay them online. Visit the Pay My Bill section at CVWD.org. Pay by mail: Mailed payments should be sent to: P.O. Box 5000, Coachella, CA 92236. Pay by phone: To pay by phone, call the CVWD automated system 24/7 at (844) 309-5917 or (760) 391-9600. Customer Service Representatives are available Monday through Friday from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. Pay in person: Payment with a customer service representative is available in both our Palm Desert and Coachella locations during business hours: 8 a.m. to 4 p.m. | Palm Desert: 75-525 Hovley Lane East & Coachella: 51-501 Tyler St. Drop boxes are also available 24 hours a day at offices in Palm Desert and Coachella. Presort Standard U.S. POSTAGE PAID Permit No. 104 Palm Desert, CA 92260 894 APPENDIX G Project Personnel Qualifications 895 7 2 0 2 6 t h S tr ee t Sa c r a m en t o , C A 9 5 8 1 6 j t e r w i l l i g e r @ h i l l m a n n c o ns u l t i n g.c o m C O N T A C T I N F O R M A T I O N B .S . E n vi r o n m en t a l S c i e nc e , U n i v e r s i t y o f So u t h er n C a l i f or n i a , L o s A ng e l e s, C A W e s t C o a s t R e g i o n a l M a n a g e r E n v i r o n m e n t a l H e a l t h & S a f e t y J O H N "R Y A N " T E R W I L L I G E R P R O F E S S I O N A L E X P E R I E N C E M r . T e r w i l l i g e r i s r e s p o n s i b l e f o r b u s i n e s s o p e r a t i o n s , f i s c a l m a n a g e m e n t , a n d f i e l d s t a f f m a n a g e m e n t f o r H i l l m a n n ’s O r a n g e , C A o f f i c e . H e a l s o p e r f o r m s a s b e s t o s s u r v e y s a n d i n v e s t i g a t i o n s t o i d e n t i f y a s b e s t o s a n d l e a d m a t e r i a l s a s s o c i a t e d w i t h o c c u p a t i o n a l h a z a r d s . H e s u p e r v i s e s w o r k p r a c t i c e s a n d c o n t r o l s i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h j o b s p e c i f i c a t i o n s , c u r r e n t E P A , O S H A , a n d S t a t e R e g u l a t i o n s f o r a s b e s t o s r e m e d i a t i o n p r o j e c t s i n c o m m e r c i a l , i n d u s t r i a l a n d m u l t i -f a m i l y r e s i d e n t i a l b u i l d i n g s . M r . T e r w i l l i g e r a l s o p e r f o r m s I A Q a n d m o l d a n d m o i s t u r e i n v e s t i g a t i o n s i n c o m m e r c i a l , i n d u s t r i a l , a n d r e s i d e n t i a l s e t t i n g s n a t i o n w i d e . A d d i t i o n a l l y , h e c o n d u c t s a w a r e n e s s t r a i n i n g o n e n v i r o n m e n t a l t o p i c s s u c h a s a s b e s t o s , l e a d a n d m o l d a n d p r o v i d e s l i t i g a t i o n s u p p o r t c o n s u l t a t i o n . (5 5 9 ) 9 0 5 -6 7 44 E D U C A T I O N C E R T I F I C A T I O N S C a l -O S H A C e r t i fi e d A s b e s t o s C o n s u l t a nt C D P H A cc r e d i t ed L e a d I n sp e c t o r /As se s s o r/ P ro j e c t M on i t o r C A C e r t i fie d Sit e S u r v e i l l an c e T ec hn i c i a n O S HA 4 0 - H r H A Z WO P E R W I T H H I L L M A N N S I N C E 2 0 1 6 R E L E V A N T P R O J E C T E X P E R I E N C E T i s h m a n S p e y e r P r o p e r t i e s | V a r i o u s L o c a t i o n s H i l l m a n n h a s p r o v i d e d t h e c o m p l e t e e n v i r o n m e n t a l p r o g r a m f o r T i s h m a n S p e y e r p r o p e r t i e s s i n c e 1 9 8 7 . O u r s e r v i c e s i n c l u d e e n v i r o n m e n t a l h e a l t h a n d s a f e t y , i n d u s t r i a l h y g i e n e , p h a s e I e n v i r o n m e n t a l s i t e a s s e s s m e n t s , a s b e s t o s s u r v e y s , a i r m o n i t o r i n g , b i d a d m i n i s t r a t i o n , O &M p r o g r a m s a n d i n d o o r a i r q u a l i t y p r o g r a m s o n v a r i o u s c o m m e r c i a l , i n d u s t r i a l a n d m u l t i -f a m i l y r e s i d e n t i a l p r o p e r t i e s . W e s t f i e l d | V a r i o u s L o c a t i o n s S i n c e 2 0 0 0 , H i l l m a n n h a s b e e n p r o v i d i n g a n e n v i r o n m e n t a l p r o g r a m e n c o m p a s s i n g e n v i r o n m e n t a l h e a l t h a n d s a f e t y , p h a s e I e n v i r o n m e n t a l s i t e a s s e s s m e n t s , a s b e s t o s a n d l e a d s u r v e y s , a i r m o n i t o r i n g , b i d a d m i n i s t r a t i o n a n d O &M p r o g r a m s , i n d u s t r i a l h y g i e n e a n d i n d o o r a i r q u a l i t y p r o g r a m s , a n d h a z a r d o u s m a t e r i a l s a s s e s s m e n t s o n t h e i r m a l l p r o p e r t i e s t h r o u g h o u t t h e c o u n t y . B r o o k f i e l d O f f i c e P r o p e r t i e s | V a r i o u s L o c a t i o n s H i l l m a n n h a s b e e n p r o v i d i n g h a z a r d o u s m a t e r i a l s s u r v e y s , d e v e l o p m e n t a b a t e m e n t s p e c i f i c a t i o n s , a n d m a n a g i n g t h e o v e r s i g h t a c t i v i t i e s d u r i n g t h e a b a t e m e n t a c t i v i t i e s a t v a r i o u s B r o o k f i e l d s i t e s t h r o u g h o u t C a l i f o r n i a . V e r i z o n | V a r i o u s L o c a t i o n s H i l l m a n n c o n d u c t e d h a z a r d o u s m a t e r i a l s s u r v e y s , d e v e l o p m e n t a b a t e m e n t s p e c i f i c a t i o n s , a n d p r o j e c t m o n i t o r i n g d u r i n g a b a t e m e n t a t v a r i o u s V e r i z o n l o c a t i o n s t h r o u g h o u t C a l i f o r n i a . 896 R E L E V A N T P R O J E C T E X P E R I E N C E C O N T I N U E D C a l i f o r n i a D e p a r t m e n t o f T r a n s p o r t a t i o n | C e n t r a l V a l l e y & N o r t h e r n C a l i f o r n i a H i l l m a n n h a s b e e n p e r f o r m i n g a s b e s t o s a n d l e a d -b a s e d p a i n t s u r v e y s f o r t h e C a l i f o r n i a D e p a r t m e n t o f T r a n s p o r t a t i o n (D O T ). I N d o i n g s o , w e p e r f o r m c o m p r e h e n s i v e a s b e s t o s c o n t a i n i n g m a t e r i a l s a n d l e a d -b a s e d p a i n t s u r v e y s o f r e s i d e n t i a l a n d c o m m e r c i a l b u i l d i n g s t h a t a r e s l a t e d f o r d e m o l i t i o n a n d g e n e r a t e d a r e p o r t o f f i n d i n g s i n o r d e r t o a i d t h e D O T i n f a c i l i t a t i n g t h e r o a d i m p r o v e m e n t p r o g r a m s a n d b u i l d i n g r e n o v a t i o n s t h r o u g h o u t t h e C e n t r a l V a l l e y a n d N o r t h e r n C a l i f o r n i a a r e a s . A l s o , d u r i n g t h e a b a t e m e n t o f a s b e s t o s f r o m D O T -o w n e d b u i l d i n g s , w e p r o v i d e c o n t r a c t o r o v e r s i g h t a n d a i r m o n i t o r i n g s e r v i c e s f o r r e g u l a t o r y c o m p l i a n c e . P u b l i c S t o r a g e | L o s A n g e l e s , C A H i l l m a n p r e f o r m e d c o m p r e h e n s i v e a s b e s t o s , l e a d -b a s e d p a i n t , a n d u n i v e r s a l w a s t e m a t e r i a l s s u r v e y o f c o m m e r c i a l a n d i n d u s t r i a l b u i l d i n g s t h r o u g h o u t S o u t h e r n C a l i f o r n i a . H a z a r d o u s m a t e r i a l s s u r v e y s w e r e c o n d u c t e d p r i o r t o r e n o v a t i o n . M r . T e r w i l l i g e r d e v e l o p e d a b a t e m e n t s p e c i f i c a t i o n s a n d m a n a g e d t h e a b a t e m e n t o v e r s i g h t d u r i n g t h e r e n o v a t i o n o f t h e b u i l d i n g s . 897 17 4 5 W . O r a n g ew o o d A v e n u e Su it e 2 0 1 O r a n ge , C A 9 28 6 8 g c y r u l i k @ h i l l m a n n c o ns u l t i n g.c om C O N T A C T I N F O R M A T I O N B .S . Ge o g r a ph y a n d M i n o r i n E n vir o nm e n t a l Sc i e n c e M o n t c la i r S t a t e U n i v e r si t y , M o n t c l air , N J E n v i r o n m e n t a l T e c h n i c i a n E n v i r o n m e n t a l H e a l t h & S a f e t y G A B R I E L A C Y R U L I K P R O F E S S I O N A L E X P E R I E N C E M s . C y r u l i k i s a n E n v i r o n m e n t a l T e c h n i c i a n f o r o u r S o u t h e r n C a l i f o r n i a O f f i c e . M s . C y r u l i k h a s s u p e r v i s e d w o r k p r a c t i c e s a n d c o n t r o l s i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h j o b s p e c i f i c a t i o n s , c u r r e n t E P A , O S H A , a n d s t a t e r e g u l a t i o n s f o r a s b e s t o s a b a t e m e n t p r o j e c t s i n s c h o o l s , a s w e l l a s c o m m e r c i a l , i n d u s t r i a l , p u b l i c , a n d m u l t i -f a m i l y r e s i d e n t i a l b u i l d i n g s . A s a n E n v i r o n m e n t a l T e c h n i c i a n , M s . C y r u l i k p e r f o r m s q u a l i t y a s s u r a n c e a i r s a m p l i n g f o r a s b e s t o s , l e a d , a n d m o l d a b a t e m e n t p r o j e c t s . S h e i s a l s o r e s p o n s i b l e f o r p e r f o r m i n g a i r a n d s u r f a c e h a z a r d m a t e r i a l s t e s t i n g , a n d p o t a b l e a n d n o n -p o t a b l e w a t e r s a m p l i n g . S h e r e g u l a r l y p e r f o r m s I n d o o r A i r Q u a l i t y A s s e s s m e n t s a s w e l l f o r s e v e r a l h i g h -p r o f i l e c l i e n t s . A d d i t i o n a l l y , M s . C y r u l i k i s s k i l l e d a t p e r f o r m i n g P h a s e I e n v i r o n m e n t a l s i t e a s s e s s m e n t s a n d t r a n s a c t i o n s c r e e n s t o m e e t e n v i r o n m e n t a l d u e d i l i g e n c e r e q u i r e m e n t s u n d e r C E R C L A . 7 1 4 -3 9 2-5 9 2 0 E D U C A T I O N W I T H H I L L M A N N S I N C E 2 0 1 9 R E L E V A N T P R O J E C T E X P E R I E N C E T i s h m a n S p e y e r P r o p e r t i e s | N a t i o n w i d e H i l l m a n n h a s b e e n p r o v i d i n g t h e c o m p l e t e e n v i r o n m e n t a l p r o g r a m f o r T i s h m a n S p e y e r ’s p r o p e r t i e s s i n c e 1 9 8 7 . O u r s e r v i c e s i n c l u d e : p h a s e I e n v i r o n m e n t a l s i t e a s s e s s m e n t s , a s b e s t o s s u r v e y s , a i r m o n i t o r i n g , b i d a d m i n i s t r a t i o n , O &M p r o g r a m s , i n d u s t r i a l h y g i e n e , a n d i n d o o r a i r q u a l i t y p r o g r a m s . M s . C y r u l i k f u n c t i o n s a s a n I n d u s t r i a l H y g i e n i s t o n t h i s c o n t r a c t , w h i c h i s o n g o i n g , a n d p e r f o r m s I n d o o r A i r Q u a l i t y A s s e s s m e n t s . B r o o k f i e l d P r o p e r t i e s | V a r i o u s L o c a t i o n s H i l l m a n n p e r f o r m s i n d u s t r i a l h y g i e n e , m i c r o b i a l , i n d o o r a i r q u a l i t y , a s b e s t o s s u r v e y s , p r o j e c t d e s i g n i n v e s t i g a t i o n s , p r o j e c t m a n a g e m e n t , b u l k s a m p l i n g a n d a n a l y s i s , a n d g e o t e c h n i c a l s e r v i c e s i n n u m e r o u s b u i l d i n g s i n t h e N e w Y o r k C i t y , N Y a n d L o s A n g e l e s , C A m e t r o p o l i t a n a r e a s . M s . C y r u l i k i s a n I n d u s t r i a l H y g i e n i s t o n t h i s c o n t r a c t . C E R T I F I C A T I O N S O S HA 1 0 -h r C o n s t r u c t i o n S a fe t y & He al t h C A DP H L e a d S a m p l i n g T e c h nic i a n C er t i f i e d i n F i re & S mo k e R e s to r a t i o n 898 City of Palm Desert Shadow Ridge Project, PP 23-0023/VTTM 38866 SECTION 15183 ANALYSIS TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES APPENDIX 6 899 2014 Whitewater River Region WQMP Project Specific Water Quality Management Plan For: Vesting Tentative Tract 38866 9003 Shadow Ridge Road Palm Desert, CA 92211 DEVELOPMENT NO. TRACT 38866 DESIGN REVIEW NO. DESIGN REVIEW NO. Prepared for: Toll Brothers 350 Commerce, Suite 200 Irvine, CA 92602 Telephone: (909) 438-6224 Prepared by: Scott Wilson, Principal Wilson Mikami Corporation 9 Corporate Park, Suite 100 Irvine, CA 92602 Telephone: (949) 679-0090 Original Date Prepared: October 12, 2023 Revision Date(s): 900 901 2014 Whitewater River Region WQMP Vesting Tentative Tract 38866 October 12, 2023 1-i Contents SECTION PAGE I. Project Description ...................................................................................................................... 1 II. Site Characterization ................................................................................................................... 4 III. Pollutants of Concern .................................................................................................................. 6 IV. Hydrologic Conditions of Concern ............................................................................................ 7 V. Best Management Practices ........................................................................................................ 8 V.1 SITE DESIGN BMP CONCEPTS, LID/SITE DESIGN AND TREATMENT CONTROL BMPS ...... 8 V.1.A SITE DESIGN BMP CONCEPTS AND LID/SITE DESIGN BMPS ................................. 10 V.1.B TREATMENT CONTROL BMPS ................................................................................ 16 V.1.C MEASURABLE GOAL SUMMARY ............................................................................. 18 V.2 SOURCE CONTROL BMPS ................................................................................................. 19 V.3 EQUIVALENT TREATMENT CONTROL BMP ALTERNATIVES ............................................ 21 V.4 REGIONALLY-BASED BMPS ............................................................................................. 21 VI. Operation and Maintenance Responsibility for BMPs ......................................................... 22 VII. Funding ....................................................................................................................................... 23 TABLES TABLE 1. POLLUTANT OF CONCERN SUMMARY 6 TABLE 2. BMP SELECTION MATRIX BASED UPON POLLUTANT OF CONCERN REMOVAL EFFICIENCY 9 TABLE 3. IMPLEMENTATION OF SITE DESIGN BMP CONCEPTS 11 TABLE 4. LID/SITE DESIGN BMPS MEETING THE LID/SITE DESIGN MEASURABLE GOAL 15 TABLE 5: TREATMENT CONTROL BMP SUMMARY 17 TABLE 6: MEASURABLE GOAL SUMMARY 18 TABLE 7. SOURCE CONTROL BMPS 19 APPENDICES A. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL B. VICINITY MAP, WQMP SITE PLAN, AND RECEIVING WATERS MAP C. SUPPORTING DETAIL RELATED TO HYDROLOGIC CONDITIONS OF CONCERN (IF APPLICABLE) D. EDUCATIONAL MATERIALS E. SOILS REPORT (IF APPLICABLE) F. STRUCTURAL BMP AND/OR RETENTION FACILITY SIZING CALCULATIONS AND DESIGN DETAILS G. AGREEMENTS – CC&RS, COVENANT AND AGREEMENTS, BMP MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS AND/OR OTHER MECHANISMS FOR ENSURING ONGOING OPERATION, MAINTENANCE, FUNDING AND TRANSFER OF REQUIREMENTS FOR THIS PROJECT-SPECIFIC WQMP H. PHASE 1 ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT – SUMMARY OF SITE REMEDIATION CONDUCTED AND USE RESTRICTIONS I. PROJECT-SPECIFIC WQMP SUMMARY DATA FORM 902 2014 Whitewater River Region WQMP Vesting Tentative Tract 38866 October 12, 2023 1-1 I. Project Description Project Owner: Marriot Ownership Resorts, Inc. a Delaware Company 9002 San Marco Court Orlando, FL 32819 (407) 206-6309 WQMP Preparer: Scott Wilson, Principal 9 Corporate Park, Suite 100 Irvine, CA 92602 (949) 679-0090 Project Site Address: 9003 Shadow Ridge Road Palm Desert, CA 92211 Planning Area/ Community Name/ Development Name: Residences at Shadow Ridge APN Number(s): APN 694-290-010 APN 694-290-011 APN 694-320-010 APN 694- 320-011 Latitude & Longitude: 33.775 LAT, -116.384 LONG Receiving Water: Whitewater River Project Site Size: 20.5 AC Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) Code: N/A Formation of Home Owners' Association (HOA) or Property Owners Association (POA): Y N 903 2014 Whitewater River Region WQMP Vesting Tentative Tract 38866 October 12, 2023 1-2 Additional Permits/Approvals required for the Project: AGENCY Permit required State Department of Fish and Wildlife, Fish and Game Code §1602 Streambed Alteration Agreement Y N State Water Resources Control Board, Clean Water Act (CWA) Section 401 Water Quality Certification Y N US Army Corps of Engineers, CWA Section 404 permit Y N US Fish and Wildlife, Endangered Species Act Section 7 biological opinion Y N Statewide Construction General Permit Coverage Y N Statewide Industrial General Permit Coverage Y N Other (please list in the space below as required) 904 2014 Whitewater River Region WQMP Vesting Tentative Tract 38866 October 12, 2023 1-3 The proposed project includes the development of 93 single family residential units and a park within the existing Shadow Ridge Golf Course Appendix A of this project-specific WQMP includes a complete copy of the final Conditions of Approval. Appendix B of this project-specific WQMP includes: a. A Vicinity Map identifying the project site and surrounding planning areas in sufficient detail; and b. A Site Plan for the project. The Site Plan included as part of Appendix B depicts the following project features:  Location and identification of all structural BMPs, including Source Control, LID/Site Design and Treatment Control BMPs.  Landscaped areas.  Paved areas and intended uses (i.e., parking, outdoor work area, outdoor material storage area, sidewalks, patios, tennis courts, etc.).  Number and type of structures and intended uses (i.e., buildings, tenant spaces, dwelling units, community facilities such as pools, recreation facilities, tot lots, etc.).  Infrastructure (i.e., streets, storm drains, etc.) that will revert to public agency ownership and operation.  Location of existing and proposed public and private storm drainage facilities (i.e., storm drains, channels, basins, etc.), including catch basins and other inlets/outlet structures. Existing and proposed drainage facilities should be clearly differentiated.  Location(s) of Receiving Waters to which the project directly or indirectly discharges.  Location of points where onsite (or tributary offsite) flows exit the property/project site.  Delineation of proposed drainage area boundaries, including tributary offsite areas, for each location where flows exit the project site and existing site (where existing site flows are required to be addressed). Each tributary area should be clearly denoted.  Pre- and post-project topography. Appendix I is a one page form that summarizes pertinent information relative to this project- specific WQMP. 905 2014 Whitewater River Region WQMP Vesting Tentative Tract 38866 October 12, 2023 1-4 II. Site Characterization Land Use Designation or Zoning: Planned Residential Current Property Use: Golf Course Proposed Property Use: Planned Residential Availability of Soils Report: Y N Note: A soils report is required if infiltration BMPs are utilized. Attach report in Appendix E. Phase 1 Site Assessment: Y N Note: If prepared, attached remediation summary and use restrictions in Appendix H. 906 2014 Whitewater River Region WQMP Vesting Tentative Tract 38866 October 12, 2023 1-5 Receiving Waters for Urban Runoff from Site Receiving Waters EPA Approved 303(d) List Impairments Designated Beneficial Uses Proximity to RARE Beneficial Use Designated Receiving Waters Whitewater River DDT, Dieldrin,Indicator Bacteria,Total Ammonia, PCBs (Polychlorinated biphenyls), Toxaphene, Toxicity MUN, AGR, GWR, REC I, REC II, COLD, WILD, POW 5 MILES Coachella Valley Storm Water Channel DDT, Dieldrin,Indicator Bacteria,Total Ammonia, PCBs (Polychlorinated biphenyls), Toxaphene, Toxicity FRSH, REC I, REC II, WARM, WILD, RARE 10 MILES Insert name of 3rd Receiving Water Arsenic, Chloride, Chlorpyrifos, DDT, Enterococcus, Low Dissolved Oxygen, Total Ammonia, Nutrients, Salinity, Toxicity AQUA, IND, REC I, REC II, WARM, WILD, RARE 60 MILES 907 2014 Whitewater River Region WQMP Vesting Tentative Tract 38866 October 12, 2023 1-6 III. Pollutants of Concern Table 1. Pollutant of Concern Summary Pollutant Category Potential for Project and/or Existing Site Causing Receiving Water Impairment Bacteria/Virus P NONE Heavy Metals N NONE Nutrients P NONE Toxic Organic Compounds N NONE Sediment/Turbidity P NONE Trash & Debris P NONE Oil & Grease P NONE Other (specify pollutant): Other (specify pollutant): 908 2014 Whitewater River Region WQMP Vesting Tentative Tract 38866 October 12, 2023 1-7 IV. Hydrologic Conditions of Concern Local Jurisdiction Requires On-Site Retention of Urban Runoff: Yes The project will be required to retain urban runoff onsite in conformance with local ordinance (See Table 6 of the WQMP Guidance document, "Local Land use Authorities Requiring Onsite Retention of Stormwater"). This section does not need to be completed; however, retention facility design details and sizing calculations must be included in Appendix F. No This section must be completed. This Project meets the following condition: Condition A: 1) Runoff from the Project is discharged directly to a publicly-owned, operated and maintained MS4 or engineered and maintained channel, 2) the discharge is in full compliance with local land use authority requirements for connections and discharges to the MS4 (including both quality and quantity requirements), 3) the discharge would not significantly impact stream habitat in proximate Receiving Waters, and 4) the discharge is authorized by the local land use authority. Condition B: The project disturbs less than 1 acre and is not part of a larger common plan of development that exceeds 1 acre of disturbance. The disturbed area calculation must include all disturbances associated with larger plans of development. Condition C: The project's runoff flow rate, volume, velocity and duration for the post-development condition do not exceed the pre-development condition for the 2- year, 24-hour and 10-year 24-hour rainfall events. This condition can be achieved by, where applicable, complying with the local land use authority's on-site retention ordinance, or minimizing impervious area on a site and incorporating other Site- Design BMP concepts and LID/Site Design BMPs that assure non-exceedance of pre-development conditions. This condition must be substantiated by hydrologic modeling methods acceptable to the local land use authority. None: Refer to Section 3.4 of the Whitewater River Region WQMP Guidance document for additional requirements. Supporting engineering studies, calculations, and reports are included in Appendix C. 2 year – 24 hour 10 year – 24 hour Precondition Post-condition Precondition Post-condition Discharge (cfs) Velocity (fps) Volume (cubic feet) Duration (minutes) 909 2014 Whitewater River Region WQMP Vesting Tentative Tract 38866 October 12, 2023 1-8 V. Best Management Practices This project implements Best Management Practices (BMPs) to address the Pollutants of Concern that may potentially be generated from the use of the Choose one: 'project site' or 'project site plus existing site area(s)'. These BMPs have been selected and implemented to comply with Section 3.5 of the WQMP Guidance document, and consist of Site Design BMP concepts, Source Control, LID/Site Design and, if/where necessary, Treatment Control BMPs as described herein. V.1 SITE DESIGN BMP CONCEPTS, LID/SITE DESIGN AND TREATMENT CONTROL BMPS Local Jurisdiction Requires On-Site Retention of Urban Runoff: Yes The project will be required to retain Urban Runoff onsite in conformance with local ordinance (See Table 6 of the WQMP Guidance document, "Local Land use Authorities Requiring Onsite Retention of Stormwater). The LID/Site Design measurable goal has thus been met (100%), and Sections V.1.A and V.1.B do not need to be completed; however, retention facility design details and sizing calculations must be included in Appendix F, and '100%' should be entered into Column 3 of Table 6 below. No Section V.1 must be completed. This section of the Project-Specific WQMP documents the LID/Site Design BMPs and, if/where necessary, the Treatment Control BMPs that will be implemented on the project to meet the requirements detailed within Section 3.5.1 of the WQMP Guidance document. Section 3.5.1 includes requirements to implement Site Design Concepts and BMPs, and includes requirements to address Pollutants of Concern with BMPs. Further, sub-section 3.5.1.1 specifically requires that Pollutants of Concern be addressed with LID/Site Design BMPs to the extent feasible. LID/Site Design BMPs are those BMPs listed within Table 2 below which promote retention and/or feature a natural treatment mechanism; off-site and regionally-based BMPs are also LID/Site Design BMPs, and therefore count towards the measurable goal, if they fit these criteria. This project incorporates LID/Site Design BMPs to fully address the Treatment Control BMP requirement where and to the extent feasible. If and where it has been acceptably demonstrated to the local land use authority that it is infeasible to fully meet this requirement with LID/Site Design BMPs, Section V.1.B (below) includes a description of the conventional Treatment Control BMPs that will be substituted to meet the same requirements. In addressing Pollutants of Concern, BMPs are selected using Table 2 below. 910 2014 Whitewater River Region WQMP Vesting Tentative Tract 38866 October 12, 2023 1-9 Table 2. BMP Selection Matrix Based Upon Pollutant of Concern Removal Efficiency (1) (Sources: Riverside County Flood Control & Water Conservation District Design Handbook for Low Impact Development Best Management Practices, dated September 2011, the Orange County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans, dated May 19, 2011, and the Caltrans Treatment BMP Technology Report, dated April 2010 and April 2008) Pollutant of Concern Landscape Swale2, 3 Landscape Strip2, 3 Biofiltration (with underdrain)2, 3 Extended Detention Basin2 Sand Filter Basin2 Infiltration Basin2 Infiltration Trench2 Permeable Pavement2 Bioretention (w/o underdrain)2, 3 Other BMPs Including Proprietary BMPs4, 6 Sediment & Turbidity M M H M H H H H H Varies by Product5 Nutrients L/M L/M M L/M L/M H H H H Toxic Organic Compounds M/H M/H M/H L L/M H H H H Trash & Debris L L H H H H H L H Bacteria & Viruses (also: Pathogens) L M H L M H H H H Oil & Grease M M H M H H H H H Heavy Metals M M/H M/H L/M M H H H H Abbreviations: L: Low removal efficiency M: Medium removal efficiency H: High removal efficiency Notes: (1) Periodic performance assessment and updating of the guidance provided by this table may be necessary. (2) Expected performance when designed in accordance with the most current edition of the document, "Riverside County, Whitewater River Region Stormwater Quality Best Management Practice Design Handbook". (3) Performance dependent upon design which includes implementation of thick vegetative cover. Local water conservation and/or landscaping requirements should be considered; approval is based on the discretion of the local land use authority. (4) Includes proprietary stormwater treatment devices as listed in the CASQA Stormwater Best Management Practices Handbooks, other stormwater treatment BMPs not specifically listed in this WQMP (including proprietary filters, hydrodynamic separators, inserts, etc.), or newly developed/emerging stormwater treatment technologies. (5) Expected performance should be based on evaluation of unit processes provided by BMP and available testing data. Approval is based on the discretion of the local land use authority. (6) When used for primary treatment as opposed to pre-treatment, requires site-specific approval by the local land use authority. 911 2014 Whitewater River Region WQMP Vesting Tentative Tract 38866 October 12, 2023 1-10 V.1.A SITE DESIGN BMP CONCEPTS AND LID/SITE DESIGN BMPS This section documents the Site Design BMP concepts and LID/Site Design BMPs that will be implemented on this project to comply with the requirements detailed in Section 3.5.1 of the WQMP Guidance document.  Table 3 herein documents the implementation of the Site Design BMP Concepts described in sub-sections 3.5.1.3 and 3.5.1.4.  Table 4 herein documents the extent to which this project has implemented the LID/Site Design goals described in sub-section 3.5.1.1. 912 2014 Whitewater River Region WQMP Vesting Tentative Tract 38866 October 12, 2023 1-11 Table 3. Implementation of Site Design BMP Concepts Included Brief Reason for BMPs Indicated as No or N/A Design Concept Technique Specific BMP Yes No N/A Site Design BMP Concept 1 Minimize Urban Runoff, Minimize Impervious Footprint, and Conserve Natural Areas (See WQMP Section 3.5.1.3) Conserve natural areas by concentrating or clustering development on the least environmentally sensitive portions of a site while leaving the remaining land in a natural, undisturbed condition. Conserve natural areas by incorporating the goals of the Multi- Species Habitat Conservation Plan or other natural resource plans. Preserve natural drainage features and natural depressional storage areas on the site. Maximize canopy interception and water conservation by preserving existing native trees and shrubs, and planting additional native or drought tolerant trees and large shrubs. Use natural drainage systems. Where applicable, incorporate Self-Treating Areas Where applicable, incorporate Self-Retaining Areas Increase the building floor to area ratio (i.e., number of stories above or below ground). Construct streets, sidewalks and parking lot aisles to minimum widths necessary, provided that public safety and a walkable environment for pedestrians are not compromised. Reduce widths of streets where off-street parking is available. Minimize the use of impervious surfaces, such as decorative concrete, in the landscape design. Other comparable and equally effective Site Design BMP concept(s) as approved by the local land use authority (Note: Additional narrative required to describe BMP and how it addresses site design concept). 913 2014 Whitewater River Region WQMP Vesting Tentative Tract 38866 October 12, 2023 1-12 Table 3. Site Design BMP Concepts (continued) Included Brief Reason for Each BMP Indicated as No or N/A Design Concept Technique Specific BMP Yes No N/A Site Design BMP Concept 2 Minimize Directly Connected Impervious Area (See WQMP Section 3.5.1.4) Design residential and commercial sites to contain and infiltrate roof runoff, or direct roof runoff to landscaped swales or buffer areas. Drain impervious sidewalks, walkways, trails, and patios into adjacent landscaping. Incorporate landscaped buffer areas between sidewalks and streets. Use natural or landscaped drainage swales in lieu of underground piping or imperviously lined swales. Where soil conditions are suitable, use perforated pipe or gravel filtration pits for low flow infiltration. Maximize the permeable area by constructing walkways, trails, patios, overflow parking, alleys, driveways, low-traffic streets, and other low- traffic areas with open-jointed paving materials or permeable surfaces such as pervious concrete, porous asphalt, unit pavers, and granular materials. Use one or more of the following: Rural swale system: street sheet flows to landscaped swale or gravel shoulder, curbs used at street corners, and culverts used under driveways and street crossings. Urban curb/swale system: street slopes to curb; periodic swale inlets drain to landscaped swale or biofilter. Dual drainage system: first flush captured in street catch basins and discharged to adjacent vegetated swale or gravel shoulder; high flows connect directly to MS4s. Other comparable and equally effective Site Design BMP concept(s) as approved by the local land use authority (Note: Additional narrative required to describe BMP and how it addresses site design concept). Use one or more of the following for design of driveways and private residential parking areas: Design driveways with shared access, flared (single lane at street), or wheel strips (paving only under the tires). Uncovered temporary or guest parking on residential lots paved with a permeable surface, or designed to drain into landscaping. 914 2014 Whitewater River Region WQMP Vesting Tentative Tract 38866 October 12, 2023 1-13 Table 3. Site Design BMP Concepts (continued) Included Brief Reason for Each BMP Indicated as No or N/A Design Concept Technique Specific BMP Yes No N/A Site Design BMP Concept 2 (cont'd) Minimize Directly Connected Impervious Area (See WQMP Section 3.5.1.4) Other comparable and equally effective Site Design BMP concept(s) as approved by the local land use authority (Note: Additional narrative required to describe BMP and how it addresses site design concept). Use one or more of the following for design of parking areas: Where landscaping is proposed in parking areas, incorporate parking area landscaping into the drainage design. Overflow parking (parking stalls provided in excess of the Permittee's minimum parking requirements) may be constructed with permeable pavement. Other comparable and equally effective Site Design BMP (or BMPs) as approved by the local land use authority (Note: Additional narrative required describing BMP and how it addresses site design concept). 915 2014 Whitewater River Region WQMP Vesting Tentative Tract 38866 October 12, 2023 1-14 Project Site Design BMP Concepts: NA Alternative Project Site Design BMP Concepts: Per Palm Desert Ordinance 1247, developments or redevelopments of one acre or more in size shall be designated to retain the stormwater from a one hundred year, twenty-four hour, duration storm on site. See Appendix F for calculations 916 2014 Whitewater River Region WQMP Vesting Tentative Tract 38866 October 12, 2023 1-15 Table 4. LID/Site Design BMPs Meeting the LID/Site Design Measurable Goal (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) DRAINAGE SUB-AREA ID OR NO. LID/SITE DESIGN BMP TYPE* POTENTIAL POLLUTANTS OF CONCERN WITHIN DRAINAGE SUB-AREA POTENTIAL POLLUTANTS WITHIN SUB- AREA CAUSING RECEIVING WATER IMPAIRMENTS EFFECTIVENESS OF LID/SITE DESIGN BMP AT ADDRESSING IDENTIFIED POTENTIAL POLLUTANTS BMP MEETS WHICH DESIGN CRITERIA? TOTAL AREA WITHIN DRAINAGE SUB-AREA (See Table 2) (Refer to Table 1) (Refer to Table 1) (U, L, M, H/M, H; see Table 2) (Identify as VBMP OR QBMP) (Nearest 0.1 acre) TOTAL PROJECT AREA TREATED WITH LID/SITE DESIGN BMPs (NEAREST 0.1 ACRE) * LID/Site Design BMPs listed in this table are those that completely address the 'Treatment Control BMP requirement' for their drainage sub-area. 917 2014 Whitewater River Region WQMP Vesting Tentative Tract 38866 October 12, 2023 1-16 Justification of infeasibility for sub-areas not addressed with LID/Site Design BMPs Per Palm Desert Ordinance 1247, developments or redevelopments of one acre or more in size shall be designated to retain the stormwater from a one hundred year, twenty-four hour, duration storm on site. See Appendix F for calculations V.1.B TREATMENT CONTROL BMPS Conventional Treatment Control BMPs shall be implemented to address the project's Pollutants of Concern as required in WQMP Section 3.5.1 where, and to the extent that, Section V.1.A has demonstrated that it is infeasible to meet these requirements through implementation of LID/Site Design BMPs. The LID/Site Design BMPs described in Section V.1.A of this project-specific WQMP completely address the 'Treatment Control BMP requirement' for the entire project site (and where applicable, entire existing site) as required in Section 3.5.1.1 of the WQMP Guidance document. Supporting documentation for the sizing of these LID/Site Design BMPs is included in Appendix F. *Section V.1.B does not need to be completed. The LID/Site Design BMPs described in Section V.1.A of this project-specific WQMP do NOT completely address the 'Treatment Control BMP requirement' for the entire project site (or where applicable, entire existing site) as required in Section 3.5.1.1 of the WQMP. *Section V.1.B must be completed. The Treatment Control BMPs identified in this section are selected, sized and implemented to treat the design criteria of VBMP and/or QBMP for all project (and if required, existing site) drainage sub- areas which were not fully addressed using LID/Site Design BMPs. Supporting documentation for the sizing of these Treatment Control BMPs is included in Appendix F. 918 2014 Whitewater River Region WQMP Vesting Tentative Tract 38866 October 12, 2023 1-17 Table 5: Treatment Control BMP Summary (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) DRAINAGE SUB-AREA ID OR NO. TREATMENT CONTROL BMP TYPE* POTENTIAL POLLUTANTS OF CONCERN WITHIN DRAINAGE SUB-AREA POTENTIAL POLLUTANTS WITHIN SUB-AREA CAUSING RECEIVING WATER IMPAIRMENTS EFFECTIVENESS OF TREATMENT CONTROL BMP AT ADDRESSING IDENTIFIED POTENTIAL POLLUTANTS BMP MEETS WHICH DESIGN CRITERIA? TOTAL AREA WITHIN DRAINAGE SUB-AREA (See Table 2) (Refer to Table 1) (Refer to Table 1) (U, L, M, H/M, H; see Table 2) (Identify as VBMP OR QBMP) (Nearest 0.1 acre) TOTAL PROJECT AREA TREATED WITH TREATMENT CONTROL BMPs (NEAREST 0.1 ACRE) 919 2014 Whitewater River Region WQMP Vesting Tentative Tract 38866 October 12, 2023 1-18 V.1.C MEASURABLE GOAL SUMMARY This section documents the extent to which this project has met the measurable goal described in WQMP Section 3.5.1.1 of addressing 100% of the project's 'Treatment Control BMP requirement' with LID/Site Design BMPs. Projects required to retain Urban Runoff onsite in conformance with local ordinance are considered to have met the measurable goal; for these instances, '100%' is entered into Column 3 of the Table. Table 6: Measurable Goal Summary (1) (2) (3) Total Area Treated with LID/Site Design BMPs Total Area Treated with Treatment Control BMPs % of Treatment Control BMP Requirement addressed with LID/Site Design BMPs (Last row of Table 4) (Last row of Table 5) 920 2014 Whitewater River Region WQMP Vesting Tentative Tract 38866 October 12, 2023 1-19 V.2 SOURCE CONTROL BMPS This section identifies and describes the Source Control BMPs applicable and implemented on this project. Table 7. Source Control BMPs BMP Name Check One If not applicable, state brief reason Included Not Applicable Non-Structural Source Control BMPs Education for Property Owners, Operators, Tenants, Occupants, or Employees Activity Restrictions Irrigation System and Landscape Maintenance Common Area Litter Control Street Sweeping Private Streets and Parking Lots Drainage Facility Inspection and Maintenance Structural Source Control BMPs Storm Drain Inlet Stenciling and Signage Landscape and Irrigation System Design Protect Slopes and Channels Provide Community Car Wash Racks Properly Design*: Fueling Areas Residential Developmnt Air/Water Supply Area Drainage Residential Developmnt Trash Storage Areas Residential Developmnt Loading Docks Residential Developmnt Maintenance Bays Residential Developmnt Vehicle and Equipment Wash Areas Residential Developmnt Outdoor Material Storage Areas Residential Developmnt Outdoor Work Areas or Processing Areas Residential Developmnt Provide Wash Water Controls for Food Preparation Areas Residential Developmnt *Details demonstrating proper design must be included in Appendix F. 921 2014 Whitewater River Region WQMP Vesting Tentative Tract 38866 October 12, 2023 1-20 Homeowners association will regulate and maintain Appendix D includes copies of the educational materials (described in Section 3.5.2.1 of the WQMP Guidance document) that will be used in implementing this project-specific WQMP. 922 2014 Whitewater River Region WQMP Vesting Tentative Tract 38866 October 12, 2023 1-21 V.3 EQUIVALENT TREATMENT CONTROL BMP ALTERNATIVES Not Applicable V.4 REGIONALLY-BASED BMPS Not Applicable 923 2014 Whitewater River Region WQMP Vesting Tentative Tract 38866 October 12, 2023 1-22 VI. Operation and Maintenance Responsibility for BMPs Appendix G of this project-specific WQMP includes copies of CC&Rs, Covenant and Agreements, BMP Maintenance Agreement and/or other mechanisms used to ensure the ongoing operation, maintenance, funding, transfer and implementation of the project-specific WQMP requirements. To Be Determined 924 2014 Whitewater River Region WQMP Vesting Tentative Tract 38866 October 12, 2023 1-23 VII. Funding To Be Determined 925 2014 Whitewater River Region WQMP Vesting Tentative Tract 38866 Appendix A Conditions of Approval Planning Commission Resolution Dated Conditions of approval are pending 926 2014 Whitewater River Region WQMP Vesting Tentative Tract 38866 Appendix B Vicinity Map, WQMP Site Plan, and Receiving Waters Map 927 VICINITY MAP PROJECT LOCATION FIGURE 1 928 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 MIKAMI···929 CORPORATIONWILSON MIKAMI930 CORPORATION WILSON MIKAMI 931 932 Date Enter the Area Tributary to this Feature (ATRIB)ATRIB =16.94 acres AIMP =9.24 acres If =0.55 Use the following equation based on the WEF/ASCE Method CBMP = 0.858If 3 ‐ 0.78If 2 + 0.774If + 0.04 CBMP = 0.37 1.25 I = Design Rainfall Intensity, 0.2 in/hr Notes: If = AIMP/ATRIB Calculate the composite Runoff Coefficient, C for the BMP Tributary Area BMP Design Flow Rate ft3/sQBMP = QBMP = CBMP x I x ATRIB Drainage Area Number/Name DMA A Determine the Impervious Area Ratio Determine the Impervious Area within ATRIB (AIMP) Calculate Impervious Area Ratio (If) Designed by K Mikami County/City Case No TBD Company Project Number/Name 10415.00 Shadow Ridge Toll Project Whitewater Watershed BMP Design Flow Rate, QBMP (Rev. 06‐2014) Legend:Required Entries Calculated Cells Company Name Wilson Mikami Corporation 10/5/2023 933 Date Enter the Area Tributary to this Feature (ATRIB)ATRIB =16.94 acres AIMP =9.24 acres If =0.55 Use the following equation based on the WEF/ASCE Method CBMP = 0.858If 3 ‐ 0.78If 2 + 0.774If + 0.04 CBMP = 0.37 Vu = 0.15 VBMP (ft3)= VBMP =9,224 ft 3 (in*ac)/ac Notes: Calculate the composite Runoff Coefficient, C for the BMP Tributary Area 12 (in/ft) Calculate VU, the 80% Unit Storage Volume VU= 0.40 x CBMP VU (in‐ac/ac) x AT (ac) x 43,560 (ft2/ac) Determine the Impervious Area Ratio Company Project Number/Name Calculate Impervious Area Ratio (If) If = AIMP/ATRIB Determine the Impervious Area within ATRIB (AIMP) Whitewater Watershed BMP Design Volume, VBMP (Rev. 06‐2014) Legend: Determine Design Storage Volume, VBMP Calculate the design storage volume of the BMP, VBMP. 10/5/2023 Required Entries Calculated Cells 10415.00 Shadow Ridge Toll Project DMA A Designed by K MIKAMI Company Name WILSON MIKAMI CORP County/City Case No Drainage Area Number/Name 934 Date Enter the Area Tributary to this Feature (ATRIB)ATRIB =3.85 acres AIMP =2.04 acres If =0.53 Use the following equation based on the WEF/ASCE Method CBMP = 0.858If 3 ‐ 0.78If 2 + 0.774If + 0.04 CBMP = 0.36 0.28 I = Design Rainfall Intensity, 0.2 in/hr Notes: If = AIMP/ATRIB Calculate the composite Runoff Coefficient, C for the BMP Tributary Area BMP Design Flow Rate ft3/sQBMP = QBMP = CBMP x I x ATRIB Drainage Area Number/Name DMA B Determine the Impervious Area Ratio Determine the Impervious Area within ATRIB (AIMP) Calculate Impervious Area Ratio (If) Designed by K Mikami County/City Case No TBD Company Project Number/Name 10415.00 Shadow Ridge Toll Project Whitewater Watershed BMP Design Flow Rate, QBMP (Rev. 06‐2014) Legend:Required Entries Calculated Cells Company Name Wilson Mikami Corporation 10/5/2023 935 Date Enter the Area Tributary to this Feature (ATRIB)ATRIB =3.85 acres AIMP =2.04 acres If =0.53 Use the following equation based on the WEF/ASCE Method CBMP = 0.858If 3 ‐ 0.78If 2 + 0.774If + 0.04 CBMP = 0.36 Vu = 0.14 VBMP (ft3)= VBMP =1,957 ft 3 (in*ac)/ac Notes: Calculate the composite Runoff Coefficient, C for the BMP Tributary Area 12 (in/ft) Calculate VU, the 80% Unit Storage Volume VU= 0.40 x CBMP VU (in‐ac/ac) x AT (ac) x 43,560 (ft2/ac) Determine the Impervious Area Ratio Company Project Number/Name Calculate Impervious Area Ratio (If) If = AIMP/ATRIB Determine the Impervious Area within ATRIB (AIMP) Whitewater Watershed BMP Design Volume, VBMP (Rev. 06‐2014) Legend: Determine Design Storage Volume, VBMP Calculate the design storage volume of the BMP, VBMP. 10/5/2023 Required Entries Calculated Cells 10415.00 Shadow Ridge Toll Project DMA B Designed by K MIKAMI Company Name WILSON MIKAMI CORP County/City Case No Drainage Area Number/Name 936 INFILTRATION BMP – Design for Below Grade InﬁltraƟon Basin DMA A Area=16.9 AC Ap=55% VBMP (see worksheet A) =9,224 Ō3 K sat,Measured = 5.5 in/hr T=48 hours max drain Ɵme i. Determine the design inﬁltraƟon rate, Ksat,Design: K Sat,Design = K sat,Measured / FS = (5.5 in/hr)/3 = 1.83 in/hr ii. Determine minimum boƩom inﬁltraƟon, Amin: Amin = VBMP * 12in/Ō K Sat,Design * T Amin = 9224 Ō3 * 12in/Ō 1.83 in/hr * 48 hr Amin = 1,260 Ō2 iii. Determine the Basin Design, DBASIN: DBASIN = V BMP Abasin VBMP = 9,224 Ō3 Abasin= 10,368 Ō2 (see aƩached R‐Tank worksheet)* R‐Tank basin area is oversized to accommodate required detenƟon of 100‐year, 24‐hour storm volume during peak ﬂow condiƟons as well as BMP volume during ﬁrst ﬂush condiƟons. DBASIN = 9,224 Ō3 10,368 Ō2 DBASIN = 0.89 Ō Drain Ɵme = 9224 Ō3 * 12 in/Ō 1.83 in/hr * 10368 Ō2 Drain Ɵme = 5.8 hours 0.89 Ō< 5 max and drains within the required 48 hours therefore, good design 937 INFILTRATION BMP – Design for Below Grade InﬁltraƟon Basin DMA B Area=3.9 AC Ap=53% VBMP (see worksheet A) =1,957 Ō3 K sat,Measured = 5.5 in/hr T=48 hours max drain Ɵme i. Determine the design inﬁltraƟon rate, Ksat,Design: K Sat,Design = K sat,Measured / FS = (5.5 in/hr)/3 = 1.83 in/hr ii. Determine minimum boƩom inﬁltraƟon, Amin: Amin = VBMP * 12in/Ō K Sat,Design * T Amin = 1957 Ō3 * 12in/Ō 1.83 in/hr * 48 hr Amin = 268 Ō2 iii. Determine the Basin Design, DBASIN: DBASIN = V BMP Abasin VBMP = 1957 Ō3 Abasin= 2,075 Ō2 (see aƩached R‐Tank worksheet)* R‐Tank basin area is oversized to accommodate required detenƟon of 100‐year, 24‐hour storm volume during peak ﬂow condiƟons as well as BMP volume during ﬁrst ﬂush condiƟons. DBASIN = 1,957 Ō3 2,075 Ō2 DBASIN = 0.94 Ō Drain Ɵme = 1957 Ō3 * 12 in/Ō 1.83 in/hr * 2,075 Ō2 Drain Ɵme = 6.2 hours 0.94 Ō< 5 max and drains within the required 48 hours therefore, good design 938 2014 Whitewater River Region WQMP Vesting Tentative Tract 38866 Appendix C Supporting Detail Related to Hydrologic Conditions of Concern 939 2014 Whitewater River Region WQMP Vesting Tentative Tract 38866 Appendix D Educational Materials 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 959 960 961 962 963 964 Cleaning and Maintenance Manual Curb Inlet Basket/Round Curb Inlet Basket Maintenance Maintenance: The filter is designed to allow for the use of vacuum removal of captured materials in the filter basket, serviceable by centrifugal compressor vacuum units without causing damage to the filter or any part of the mounting and attachment hardware during normal cleaning and maintenance. Filters can be cleaned and vacuumed from the manhole-opening. Entering the catch basin to clean the filters is not necessary. Maintenance Notes: 1. Bio Clean Environmental Services, Inc. recommends cleaning and maintenance of the Curb Inlet Basket a minimum of two to four times per year or following a significant rain event that would potentially accumulate a large amount of debris to the system. The hydrocarbon boom should be replaced a minimum of twice per year or at each service as needed. 2. Any person performing maintenance activities that require entering the catch basin or handle a toxic substance have completed the proper training as required by OSHA. 3. Remove manhole lid to gain access to inlet filter insert. The filter basket should be located directly under the manhole lid. Under normal conditions, cleaning and maintenance of the Curb Inlet Basket will be performed from above ground surface. 4. Special Note: entry into an underground manhole, catch basin and stormwater vault requires training in an approved Confined Space Entry Program. 5. Remove all trash, debris, organics, and sediments collected by the inlet filter insert. Removal of the trash and debris can be done manually or with the use of a vactor truck. Manual removal of debris may be done by lifting the basket from the shelf and pulling the basket from the catch basin and dumping out the collected debris. 6. Any debris located on the shelf system can be either removed from the shelf or can be pushed into the basket and retrieved from basket. 7. Evaluation of the hydrocarbon boom shall be performed at each cleaning. If the boom is filled with hydrocarbons and oils it should be replaced. Removed boom by cutting plastic ties and remove boom. Attach new boom to basket with plastic ties through pre-drilled holes in basket. 8. Place manhole lid back on manhole opening. 9. Transport all debris, trash, organics and sediments to approved facility for disposal in accordance with local and state requirements. The hydrocarbon boom with adsorbed hydrocarbons is considered hazardous waste and need to be handled and disposed of as hazardous material. Please refer to state and local regulations for the proper disposal of used motor oil/filters. 10. Following maintenance and/or inspection, the maintenance operator shall prepare a maintenance/inspection record. The record shall include any maintenance activities performed, amount and description of debris collected, and condition of filter. The owner shall retain the maintenance/inspection record for a minimum of five years from the date of maintenance. These records shall be made available to the governing municipality for inspection upon request at any time. 11. Any toxic substance or item found in the filter is considered as hazardous material can only be handled by a certified hazardous waste trained person (minimum 24-hour hazwoper). 398 Via El Centro, Oceanside, CA 92058 (760 433-7640 Fax (760) 433-3176 www.biocleanenvironmental.com 965 966 967 968 969 970 971 972 973 974 975 976 977 978 979 980 981 982 983 984 985 986 987 988 989 990 991 992 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 1000 2014 Whitewater River Region WQMP Vesting Tentative Tract 38866 Appendix E Soils Report 1001 2014 Whitewater River Region WQMP Vesting Tentative Tract 38866 Appendix F Structural BMP and/or Retention Facility Sizing Calculations and Design Details 1002 CITY OF PALM DESERT RESIDENCES AT SHADOW RIDGE GOLF COURSE TRACT MAP 38866 PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT Prepared for: Marriott Ownership Resort, Inc., a Delaware corporation 9002 San Marco Court Orlando, FL 32819 October, 2023 Prepared by: WILSON•MIKAMI•CORPORATION 9 CORPORATE PARK•SUITE 100•IRVINE•CA•92606 Phone: (949) 679-0090 Fax: (949) 679-0091 1003 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction Project Description 1 Purpose 1 Methodology 1 Results 2 Conclusion 3 Project Location Map Fig. 1 Project Soils Map Fig. 2 Storm Drain Facilities Exhibit Fig. 3 II. References III. Appendices Appendix A – Proposed Condition Unit Hydrograph for 100-Year 24-Hour Storm event Appendix B – Proposed Condition Hydrology Map Appendix C - Proposed Condition Rational Method Q10 and Q100 Hydrology Appendix D – Flood Routing Calculations Appendix E - Underground Detention System Specifications 1004 I. INTRODUCTION A. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Toll Brothers is proposing the residential development Shadow Ridge Golf Course Residential Development Tract Map No. 38866, a 20.5 acre site within the City of Palm Desert. The site will consist of 93 single family residential units, and a residential park located at the end of Street C in the southwest corner of the proposed development. All streets and storm drain within the proposed development will be private and will be maintained by the Homeowners Association. The existing project site is currently a part of the Shadow Ridge Golf Course. The site has no major storm drain infrastructure but utilizes low flow pipes that discharge into the surrounding golf course lakes. The drainage from the proposed development will be collected within a series of storm drain line tributary to two underground detention systems. The drainage pattern for the proposed condition includes surface flow collected by several catch basin locations within the private drives and streets. Much of the site drains to the south and is collected by Line “A” which runs under private Streets B, C, and a portion of Street A and ultimately discharges to a proposed underground retention system within the park site at the southwest edge of the project. The runoff within the northerly half of the project will be collected and conveyed to a second underground retention basin through two catch basins and a proposed Line “C” which runs under Street A. See figure 3 for a layout of the proposed storm drain facilities. B. PURPOSE: The city of Palm Desert requires all new residential developments that disturb more than 1 acre retain the 100-year 24-hour storm on site. This drainage report is intended to analyze the proposed drainage facilities associated with the project improvements and determine that the 100-year 24-hour storm event can be stored and infiltrated on-site. C. METHODOLOGY: The existing and proposed condition flows were determined utilizing the Advanced Engineering Software (AES) package for Orange County (RATSCX) (ref. 2). The rational method can be used to estimate runoff for smaller developments, ideally less than 1 square mile in area. The projected flow Q (cfs) is based on the product of a runoff coefficient (C), the time averaged rainfall intensity (in/hr) corresponding to the time of concentration, and the drainage area (acres). The AES program has a stored 1005 2 The existing and proposed condition flows were determined utilizing the Advanced Engineering Software (AES) package for Orange County (RATSCX) (ref. 2). The rational method can be used to estimate runoff for smaller developments, ideally less than 1 square mile in area. The projected flow Q (cfs) is based on the product of a runoff coefficient (C), the time averaged rainfall intensity (in/hr) corresponding to the time of concentration, and the drainage area (acres). The AES program has a stored data base of hydrologic parameters specific to the Riverside County area including a data bank of rainfall values and curve numbers based on cover type, quality of cover, and hydrologic soil group. Input parameters include the storm frequency return period, drainage area characteristics of size, shape, and slope, and a runoff coefficient (C) corresponding to the expected land use and soil characteristics. The hydrologic soils group for the project area was determined using the WebSoil data bank. It was determined that the site has a hydrologic soil group A rating, see Figure 2 for hydrological soil map data. The flood volumes were determined using the Civil D program (ref 3), unit hydrograph module. The program utilizes the lag time, tributary area, expected rainfall data, the runoff index, and impervious percentage to determine the overall flood volume expected from the designated storm. The rainfall data was obtained using the NOAA Atlas 14-point precipitation frequency estimates for the Palm Desert Area. This data can be found in Appendix A. D. RESULTS: The Unit Hydrograph input variable and resulting flood volumes for the two major drainage areas, DMA A and DMA B are summarized below. The lag time was taken to be 0.6* Time of Concentration (Tc). DMA Area (ac) Ap (%) Lag Time Flood Volume (CF) Flood Volume (ac-ft) A 16.9 AC 55 0.163 hr 155,235 3.56 B 3.9 AC 53 0.133 hr 34,556 0.79 The calculations are included in Appendix A of this report. The proposed underground detention basin used for this project will be an ACF Environmental R-Tank Stormwater Management Systems, see Appendix E for specifications and details. The tanks will be installed at two locations to service the two major drainage areas. DMA A will have a tank installed underneath the park site. The system will be comprised of a total of 3,431 tanks (stacked 5 high) set at various stages with a capacity of 68,500 CF and a required surface area of 10,360 sf. An expected infiltration rate of 1006 an emergency overflow 12” outfall pipe set at the top of the tank. The results of the flood routing can be found in Appendix D. R-Tank A has a peak elevation of 6.77’ and a total drain time of 64 hours. R-Tank B has a peak elevation of 5.97’ and a total drain time of 64 hours. The flood routing calculations are included in Appendix D of this report. A rational method hydrology analysis was performed on proposed conditions for the 10 and 100-year storm events to determine the peak flows. Proposed Condition Flows (routed through detention facility) Storm Drain Facility Q10 (cfs) Q100 (cfs) Line “A” and Line “B” (DMA A) 14.7 35.6 Line “C” (DMA B) 3.5 8.6 The calculations are included in Appendix C. The proposed hydrology map is included in Appendix B. E. CONCLUSION: These analyses and calculations confirm that the proposed storm drain system is adequate to transport the drainage to the underground detention basin. Additionally, protection of onsite structures will be maintained for the 100-year storm event and the proposed streets and alleys have the capacity to carry the 100-year flow within the limits of the right-of-way. II. REFERENCES 1. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Hydrology Manual, April 1978 2. Advanced Engineering Software (AES) RATSCX, 2016 3. CivilCADD/Civil Design (CivilD) Version 7.0, 2004 1007 VICINITY MAP PROJECT LOCATION FIGURE 1 1008 Hydrologic Soil Group—Riverside County, Coachella Valley Area, California (SHADOW RIDGE, PALM DESERT) Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 9/27/2023 Page 1 of 437377003737800373790037380003738100373820037383003738400373850037386003737700373780037379003738000373810037382003738300373840037385003738600556900557000557100557200557300557400557500557600 557000 557100 557200 557300 557400 557500 557600 33° 47' 11'' N 116° 23' 7'' W33° 47' 11'' N116° 22' 38'' W33° 46' 39'' N 116° 23' 7'' W33° 46' 39'' N 116° 22' 38'' WN Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 11N WGS84 0 200 400 800 1200 Feet 0 50 100 200 300 Meters Map Scale: 1:4,810 if printed on A portrait (8.5" x 11") sheet. Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. FIGURE 2-SOILS MAP 1009 MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION Area of Interest (AOI) Area of Interest (AOI) Soils Soil Rating Polygons A A/D B B/D C C/D D Not rated or not available Soil Rating Lines A A/D B B/D C C/D D Not rated or not available Soil Rating Points A A/D B B/D C C/D D Not rated or not available Water Features Streams and Canals Transportation Rails Interstate Highways US Routes Major Roads Local Roads Background Aerial Photography The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:24,000. Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map measurements. Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL: Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857) Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required. This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Riverside County, Coachella Valley Area, California Survey Area Data: Version 14, Sep 1, 2022 Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000 or larger. Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Mar 15, 2022—May 28, 2022 The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. Hydrologic Soil Group—Riverside County, Coachella Valley Area, California (SHADOW RIDGE, PALM DESERT) Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 9/27/2023 Page 2 of 4 1010 Hydrologic Soil Group Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Acres in AOI Percent of AOI MaB Myoma fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes A 27.5 35.0% MaD Myoma fine sand, 5 to 15 percent slopes A 51.3 65.0% Totals for Area of Interest 78.8 100.0% Description Hydrologic soil groups are based on estimates of runoff potential. Soils are assigned to one of four groups according to the rate of water infiltration when the soils are not protected by vegetation, are thoroughly wet, and receive precipitation from long-duration storms. The soils in the United States are assigned to four groups (A, B, C, and D) and three dual classes (A/D, B/D, and C/D). The groups are defined as follows: Group A. Soils having a high infiltration rate (low runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist mainly of deep, well drained to excessively drained sands or gravelly sands. These soils have a high rate of water transmission. Group B. Soils having a moderate infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of moderately deep or deep, moderately well drained or well drained soils that have moderately fine texture to moderately coarse texture. These soils have a moderate rate of water transmission. Group C. Soils having a slow infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of soils having a layer that impedes the downward movement of water or soils of moderately fine texture or fine texture. These soils have a slow rate of water transmission. Group D. Soils having a very slow infiltration rate (high runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of clays that have a high shrink-swell potential, soils that have a high water table, soils that have a claypan or clay layer at or near the surface, and soils that are shallow over nearly impervious material. These soils have a very slow rate of water transmission. If a soil is assigned to a dual hydrologic group (A/D, B/D, or C/D), the first letter is for drained areas and the second is for undrained areas. Only the soils that in their natural condition are in group D are assigned to dual classes. Rating Options Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition Hydrologic Soil Group—Riverside County, Coachella Valley Area, California SHADOW RIDGE, PALM DESERT Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 9/27/2023 Page 3 of 4 1011 381234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363739444041424346454748504953515254555657605859636162646566696768717072877374757677787980818283848586889189909293CORPORATIONWILSON MIKAMI1012 III. APPENDICES 1013 APPENDIX A PROPOSED CONDITION UNIT HYDROGRAPHS 100-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM EVENT 1014 www.nws.noaa.gov Home Site Map Organization Search NWS All NOAA Go General Information Homepage Progress Reports FAQ Glossary Precipitation Frequency Data Server GIS Grids Maps Time Series Temporals Documents Probable Maximum Precipitation Documents Miscellaneous Publications Storm Analysis Record Precipitation Contact Us Inquiries Data description Data type:Precipitation intensity Units:English Time series type:Partial duration Select location 1) Manually: a) By location (decimal degrees, use "-" for S and W): Latitude: Longitude: Submit b) By station (list of CA stations): Select station c) By address 2) Use map: a) Select location Move crosshair or double click b) Click on station icon Show stations on map Location information: Name: Palm Desert, California, US Latitude: 33.7803° Longitude: -116.3820° Elevation: 304 ft ** * Source: ESRI Maps ** Source: USGS PF tabular PF graphical Supplementary information PDS-based precipitation frequency estimates with 90% confidence intervals (in inches/hour)1 Duration Average recurrence interval (years) 1 2 5 10 25 50 100 200 500 1000 5-min 0.732 (0.600‑0.876) 1.13 (0.936‑1.37) 1.73 (1.44‑2.10) 2.29 (1.90‑2.82) 3.20 (2.54‑4.06) 4.01 (3.12‑5.20) 4.96 (3.76‑6.59) 6.06 (4.48‑8.29) 7.85 (5.56‑11.2) 9.67 (6.61‑14.3) 10-min 0.522 (0.432‑0.630) 0.804 (0.672‑0.978) 1.24 (1.03‑1.51) 1.64 (1.36‑2.02) 2.29 (1.82‑2.91) 2.87 (2.24‑3.73) 3.55 (2.69‑4.72) 4.34 (3.20‑5.95) 5.62 (3.98‑8.03) 6.93 (4.73‑10.2) 15-min 0.420 (0.348‑0.508) 0.648 (0.540‑0.788) 1.00 (0.828‑1.22) 1.33 (1.09‑1.63) 1.85 (1.47‑2.35) 2.32 (1.80‑3.00) 2.86 (2.17‑3.80) 3.50 (2.58‑4.79) 4.53 (3.21‑6.47) 5.59 (3.82‑8.26) 30-min 0.324 (0.270‑0.394) 0.502 (0.418‑0.608) 0.774 (0.642‑0.940) 1.03 (0.846‑1.26) 1.43 (1.14‑1.82) 1.79 (1.40‑2.32) 2.21 (1.68‑2.94) 2.71 (2.00‑3.71) 3.51 (2.48‑5.01) 4.32 (2.95‑6.39) 60-min 0.236 (0.197‑0.286) 0.364 (0.303‑0.442) 0.561 (0.466‑0.683) 0.746 (0.614‑0.915) 1.04 (0.826‑1.32) 1.30 (1.01‑1.69) 1.61 (1.22‑2.14) 1.97 (1.45‑2.69) 2.55 (1.80‑3.64) 3.14 (2.14‑4.64) 2-hr 0.167 (0.139‑0.203) 0.252 (0.210‑0.306) 0.379 (0.315‑0.461) 0.495 (0.408‑0.608) 0.674 (0.536‑0.856) 0.831 (0.647‑1.08) 1.01 (0.765‑1.34) 1.21 (0.893‑1.66) 1.52 (1.08‑2.17) 1.80 (1.23‑2.66) 3-hr 0.134 (0.111‑0.162) 0.200 (0.166‑0.243) 0.298 (0.248‑0.363) 0.387 (0.319‑0.475) 0.523 (0.416‑0.664) 0.640 (0.499‑0.831) 0.771 (0.586‑1.03) 0.921 (0.679‑1.26) 1.15 (0.811‑1.64) 1.34 (0.919‑1.99) NOAA ATLAS 14 POINT PRECIPITATION FREQUENCY ESTIMATES: CA  POINT PRECIPITATION FREQUENCY (PF) ESTIMATES WITH 90% CONFIDENCE INTERVALS AND SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION NOAA Atlas 14, Volume 6, Version 2 Print page Shadow Ridge Rd, Palm Desert, CA, 9 + – 2km 1mi Map Terrain 1015 6-hr 0.091 (0.075‑0.110) 0.135 (0.113‑0.164) 0.201 (0.167‑0.244) 0.259 (0.213‑0.318) 0.348 (0.276‑0.441) 0.423 (0.329‑0.548) 0.506 (0.384‑0.673) 0.600 (0.443‑0.821) 0.741 (0.524‑1.06) 0.862 (0.589‑1.27) 12-hr 0.054 (0.045‑0.065) 0.082 (0.068‑0.099) 0.122 (0.101‑0.149) 0.158 (0.130‑0.195) 0.213 (0.170‑0.271) 0.260 (0.202‑0.337) 0.312 (0.237‑0.415) 0.370 (0.273‑0.506) 0.457 (0.323‑0.653) 0.532 (0.363‑0.787) 24-hr 0.031 (0.028‑0.036) 0.049 (0.043‑0.056) 0.074 (0.065‑0.086) 0.097 (0.085‑0.113) 0.131 (0.111‑0.158) 0.160 (0.133‑0.197) 0.193 (0.156‑0.243) 0.229 (0.181‑0.296) 0.284 (0.215‑0.382) 0.331 (0.243‑0.461) 2-day 0.017 (0.015‑0.020) 0.027 (0.024‑0.031) 0.042 (0.037‑0.048) 0.055 (0.048‑0.064) 0.074 (0.062‑0.089) 0.090 (0.075‑0.111) 0.108 (0.087‑0.136) 0.128 (0.101‑0.165) 0.158 (0.119‑0.212) 0.183 (0.134‑0.255) 3-day 0.012 (0.010‑0.014) 0.019 (0.017‑0.022) 0.029 (0.026‑0.034) 0.038 (0.033‑0.045) 0.052 (0.044‑0.063) 0.063 (0.052‑0.078) 0.076 (0.061‑0.095) 0.090 (0.071‑0.116) 0.110 (0.084‑0.149) 0.128 (0.094‑0.178) 4-day 0.009 (0.008‑0.011) 0.015 (0.013‑0.017) 0.023 (0.020‑0.026) 0.030 (0.026‑0.035) 0.040 (0.034‑0.049) 0.049 (0.041‑0.061) 0.059 (0.048‑0.074) 0.070 (0.055‑0.090) 0.086 (0.065‑0.116) 0.100 (0.073‑0.139) 7-day 0.005 (0.005‑0.006) 0.009 (0.008‑0.010) 0.014 (0.012‑0.016) 0.018 (0.016‑0.021) 0.025 (0.021‑0.030) 0.030 (0.025‑0.037) 0.036 (0.029‑0.046) 0.043 (0.034‑0.055) 0.052 (0.040‑0.071) 0.061 (0.044‑0.085) 10-day 0.004 (0.003‑0.004) 0.006 (0.006‑0.007) 0.010 (0.009‑0.012) 0.013 (0.012‑0.016) 0.018 (0.015‑0.022) 0.022 (0.018‑0.027) 0.027 (0.021‑0.034) 0.032 (0.025‑0.041) 0.039 (0.029‑0.052) 0.045 (0.033‑0.063) 20-day 0.002 (0.002‑0.002) 0.003 (0.003‑0.004) 0.005 (0.005‑0.006) 0.007 (0.006‑0.008) 0.010 (0.008‑0.012) 0.012 (0.010‑0.015) 0.015 (0.012‑0.019) 0.017 (0.014‑0.023) 0.021 (0.016‑0.029) 0.025 (0.018‑0.035) 30-day 0.001 (0.001‑0.001) 0.002 (0.002‑0.003) 0.004 (0.003‑0.004) 0.005 (0.004‑0.006) 0.007 (0.006‑0.009) 0.009 (0.007‑0.011) 0.011 (0.009‑0.014) 0.013 (0.010‑0.017) 0.016 (0.012‑0.022) 0.019 (0.013‑0.026) 45-day 0.001 (0.001‑0.001) 0.001 (0.001‑0.002) 0.003 (0.002‑0.003) 0.004 (0.003‑0.004) 0.005 (0.004‑0.006) 0.007 (0.005‑0.008) 0.008 (0.006‑0.010) 0.010 (0.007‑0.012) 0.012 (0.009‑0.016) 0.014 (0.010‑0.019) 60-day 0.000 (0.000‑0.001) 0.001 (0.001‑0.001) 0.002 (0.002‑0.002) 0.003 (0.002‑0.003) 0.004 (0.003‑0.005) 0.005 (0.004‑0.007) 0.006 (0.005‑0.008) 0.008 (0.006‑0.010) 0.010 (0.007‑0.013) 0.011 (0.008‑0.016) 1 Precipitation frequency (PF) estimates in this table are based on frequency analysis of partial duration series (PDS). Numbers in parenthesis are PF estimates at lower and upper bounds of the 90% confidence interval. The probability that precipitation frequency estimates (for a given duration and average recurrence interval) will be greater than the upper bound (or less than the lower bound) is 5%. Estimates at upper bounds are not checked against probable maximum precipitation (PMP) estimates and may be higher than currently valid PMP values. Please refer to NOAA Atlas 14 document for more information. Estimates from the table in CSV format: Precipitation frequency estimates Submit Main Link Categories: Home | OWP US Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Weather Service Office of Water Prediction (OWP) 1325 East West Highway Silver Spring, MD 20910 Page Author: HDSC webmaster Page last modified: April 21, 2017 Map Disclaimer Disclaimer Credits Glossary Privacy P Abou Career Opportun 1016 U n i t H y d r o g r a p h A n a l y s i s Copyright (c) CIVILCADD/CIVILDESIGN, 1989 - 2018, Version 9.0 Study date 10/06/23 File: SHADRA24100.out ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Riverside County Synthetic Unit Hydrology Method RCFC & WCD Manual date - April 1978 Program License Serial Number 6615 --------------------------------------------------------------------- English (in-lb) Input Units Used English Rainfall Data (Inches) Input Values Used English Units used in output format --------------------------------------------------------------------- TOLL RESIDENCES AT SHADOW RIDGE PALM DESERT DMA A 100-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM VOLUME BY KAM 100623 -------------------------------------------------------------------- Drainage Area = 16.90(Ac.) = 0.026 Sq. Mi. Drainage Area for Depth-Area Areal Adjustment = 16.90(Ac.) = 0.026 Sq. Mi. USER Entry of lag time in hours Lag time = 0.163 Hr. Lag time = 9.78 Min. 25% of lag time = 2.45 Min. 40% of lag time = 3.91 Min. Unit time = 5.00 Min. Duration of storm = 24 Hour(s) User Entered Base Flow = 0.00(CFS) 2 YEAR Area rainfall data: Area(Ac.)[1] Rainfall(In)[2] Weighting[1*2] 16.90 1.18 19.94 100 YEAR Area rainfall data: Area(Ac.)[1] Rainfall(In)[2] Weighting[1*2] 16.90 4.64 78.42 STORM EVENT (YEAR) = 100.00 Area Averaged 2-Year Rainfall = 1.180(In) Area Averaged 100-Year Rainfall = 4.640(In) Point rain (area averaged) = 4.640(In) Areal adjustment factor = 100.00 % Adjusted average point rain = 4.640(In) Sub-Area Data: 1017 Area(Ac.) Runoff Index Impervious % 16.900 32.00 0.550 Total Area Entered = 16.90(Ac.) RI RI Infil. Rate Impervious Adj. Infil. Rate Area% F AMC2 AMC-3 (In/Hr) (Dec.%) (In/Hr) (Dec.) (In/Hr) 32.0 52.0 0.552 0.550 0.279 1.000 0.279 Sum (F) = 0.279 Area averaged mean soil loss (F) (In/Hr) = 0.279 Minimum soil loss rate ((In/Hr)) = 0.139 (for 24 hour storm duration) Soil low loss rate (decimal) = 0.460 --------------------------------------------------------------------- U n i t H y d r o g r a p h DESERT S-Curve -------------------------------------------------------------------- Unit Hydrograph Data --------------------------------------------------------------------- Unit time period Time % of lag Distribution Unit Hydrograph (hrs) Graph % (CFS) --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 0.083 51.125 4.114 0.701 2 0.167 102.249 27.714 4.720 3 0.250 153.374 29.724 5.063 4 0.333 204.499 12.969 2.209 5 0.417 255.624 7.524 1.281 6 0.500 306.748 5.083 0.866 7 0.583 357.873 3.464 0.590 8 0.667 408.998 2.560 0.436 9 0.750 460.123 1.915 0.326 10 0.833 511.247 1.451 0.247 11 0.917 562.372 1.033 0.176 12 1.000 613.497 0.632 0.108 13 1.083 664.622 0.586 0.100 14 1.167 715.746 0.600 0.102 15 1.250 766.871 0.390 0.066 16 1.333 817.996 0.242 0.041 Sum = 100.000 Sum= 17.032 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- The following loss rate calculations reflect use of the minimum calculated loss rate subtracted from the Storm Rain to produce the maximum Effective Rain value Unit Time Pattern Storm Rain Loss rate(In./Hr) Effective (Hr.) Percent (In/Hr) Max | Low (In/Hr) 1 0.08 0.07 0.037 ( 0.494) 0.017 0.020 2 0.17 0.07 0.037 ( 0.492) 0.017 0.020 3 0.25 0.07 0.037 ( 0.490) 0.017 0.020 4 0.33 0.10 0.056 ( 0.488) 0.026 0.030 5 0.42 0.10 0.056 ( 0.486) 0.026 0.030 6 0.50 0.10 0.056 ( 0.484) 0.026 0.030 7 0.58 0.10 0.056 ( 0.482) 0.026 0.030 8 0.67 0.10 0.056 ( 0.481) 0.026 0.030 9 0.75 0.10 0.056 ( 0.479) 0.026 0.030 10 0.83 0.13 0.074 ( 0.477) 0.034 0.040 11 0.92 0.13 0.074 ( 0.475) 0.034 0.040 12 1.00 0.13 0.074 ( 0.473) 0.034 0.040 13 1.08 0.10 0.056 ( 0.471) 0.026 0.030 14 1.17 0.10 0.056 ( 0.469) 0.026 0.030 15 1.25 0.10 0.056 ( 0.467) 0.026 0.030 1018 16 1.33 0.10 0.056 ( 0.466) 0.026 0.030 17 1.42 0.10 0.056 ( 0.464) 0.026 0.030 18 1.50 0.10 0.056 ( 0.462) 0.026 0.030 19 1.58 0.10 0.056 ( 0.460) 0.026 0.030 20 1.67 0.10 0.056 ( 0.458) 0.026 0.030 21 1.75 0.10 0.056 ( 0.456) 0.026 0.030 22 1.83 0.13 0.074 ( 0.454) 0.034 0.040 23 1.92 0.13 0.074 ( 0.453) 0.034 0.040 24 2.00 0.13 0.074 ( 0.451) 0.034 0.040 25 2.08 0.13 0.074 ( 0.449) 0.034 0.040 26 2.17 0.13 0.074 ( 0.447) 0.034 0.040 27 2.25 0.13 0.074 ( 0.445) 0.034 0.040 28 2.33 0.13 0.074 ( 0.444) 0.034 0.040 29 2.42 0.13 0.074 ( 0.442) 0.034 0.040 30 2.50 0.13 0.074 ( 0.440) 0.034 0.040 31 2.58 0.17 0.093 ( 0.438) 0.043 0.050 32 2.67 0.17 0.093 ( 0.436) 0.043 0.050 33 2.75 0.17 0.093 ( 0.435) 0.043 0.050 34 2.83 0.17 0.093 ( 0.433) 0.043 0.050 35 2.92 0.17 0.093 ( 0.431) 0.043 0.050 36 3.00 0.17 0.093 ( 0.429) 0.043 0.050 37 3.08 0.17 0.093 ( 0.427) 0.043 0.050 38 3.17 0.17 0.093 ( 0.426) 0.043 0.050 39 3.25 0.17 0.093 ( 0.424) 0.043 0.050 40 3.33 0.17 0.093 ( 0.422) 0.043 0.050 41 3.42 0.17 0.093 ( 0.420) 0.043 0.050 42 3.50 0.17 0.093 ( 0.419) 0.043 0.050 43 3.58 0.17 0.093 ( 0.417) 0.043 0.050 44 3.67 0.17 0.093 ( 0.415) 0.043 0.050 45 3.75 0.17 0.093 ( 0.413) 0.043 0.050 46 3.83 0.20 0.111 ( 0.412) 0.051 0.060 47 3.92 0.20 0.111 ( 0.410) 0.051 0.060 48 4.00 0.20 0.111 ( 0.408) 0.051 0.060 49 4.08 0.20 0.111 ( 0.406) 0.051 0.060 50 4.17 0.20 0.111 ( 0.405) 0.051 0.060 51 4.25 0.20 0.111 ( 0.403) 0.051 0.060 52 4.33 0.23 0.130 ( 0.401) 0.060 0.070 53 4.42 0.23 0.130 ( 0.400) 0.060 0.070 54 4.50 0.23 0.130 ( 0.398) 0.060 0.070 55 4.58 0.23 0.130 ( 0.396) 0.060 0.070 56 4.67 0.23 0.130 ( 0.394) 0.060 0.070 57 4.75 0.23 0.130 ( 0.393) 0.060 0.070 58 4.83 0.27 0.148 ( 0.391) 0.068 0.080 59 4.92 0.27 0.148 ( 0.389) 0.068 0.080 60 5.00 0.27 0.148 ( 0.388) 0.068 0.080 61 5.08 0.20 0.111 ( 0.386) 0.051 0.060 62 5.17 0.20 0.111 ( 0.384) 0.051 0.060 63 5.25 0.20 0.111 ( 0.383) 0.051 0.060 64 5.33 0.23 0.130 ( 0.381) 0.060 0.070 65 5.42 0.23 0.130 ( 0.379) 0.060 0.070 66 5.50 0.23 0.130 ( 0.378) 0.060 0.070 67 5.58 0.27 0.148 ( 0.376) 0.068 0.080 68 5.67 0.27 0.148 ( 0.374) 0.068 0.080 69 5.75 0.27 0.148 ( 0.373) 0.068 0.080 70 5.83 0.27 0.148 ( 0.371) 0.068 0.080 71 5.92 0.27 0.148 ( 0.369) 0.068 0.080 72 6.00 0.27 0.148 ( 0.368) 0.068 0.080 73 6.08 0.30 0.167 ( 0.366) 0.077 0.090 74 6.17 0.30 0.167 ( 0.364) 0.077 0.090 75 6.25 0.30 0.167 ( 0.363) 0.077 0.090 76 6.33 0.30 0.167 ( 0.361) 0.077 0.090 77 6.42 0.30 0.167 ( 0.360) 0.077 0.090 78 6.50 0.30 0.167 ( 0.358) 0.077 0.090 1019 79 6.58 0.33 0.186 ( 0.356) 0.085 0.100 80 6.67 0.33 0.186 ( 0.355) 0.085 0.100 81 6.75 0.33 0.186 ( 0.353) 0.085 0.100 82 6.83 0.33 0.186 ( 0.352) 0.085 0.100 83 6.92 0.33 0.186 ( 0.350) 0.085 0.100 84 7.00 0.33 0.186 ( 0.348) 0.085 0.100 85 7.08 0.33 0.186 ( 0.347) 0.085 0.100 86 7.17 0.33 0.186 ( 0.345) 0.085 0.100 87 7.25 0.33 0.186 ( 0.344) 0.085 0.100 88 7.33 0.37 0.204 ( 0.342) 0.094 0.110 89 7.42 0.37 0.204 ( 0.340) 0.094 0.110 90 7.50 0.37 0.204 ( 0.339) 0.094 0.110 91 7.58 0.40 0.223 ( 0.337) 0.102 0.120 92 7.67 0.40 0.223 ( 0.336) 0.102 0.120 93 7.75 0.40 0.223 ( 0.334) 0.102 0.120 94 7.83 0.43 0.241 ( 0.333) 0.111 0.130 95 7.92 0.43 0.241 ( 0.331) 0.111 0.130 96 8.00 0.43 0.241 ( 0.330) 0.111 0.130 97 8.08 0.50 0.278 ( 0.328) 0.128 0.150 98 8.17 0.50 0.278 ( 0.327) 0.128 0.150 99 8.25 0.50 0.278 ( 0.325) 0.128 0.150 100 8.33 0.50 0.278 ( 0.324) 0.128 0.150 101 8.42 0.50 0.278 ( 0.322) 0.128 0.150 102 8.50 0.50 0.278 ( 0.321) 0.128 0.150 103 8.58 0.53 0.297 ( 0.319) 0.137 0.160 104 8.67 0.53 0.297 ( 0.318) 0.137 0.160 105 8.75 0.53 0.297 ( 0.316) 0.137 0.160 106 8.83 0.57 0.316 ( 0.315) 0.145 0.170 107 8.92 0.57 0.316 ( 0.313) 0.145 0.170 108 9.00 0.57 0.316 ( 0.312) 0.145 0.170 109 9.08 0.63 0.353 ( 0.310) 0.162 0.190 110 9.17 0.63 0.353 ( 0.309) 0.162 0.190 111 9.25 0.63 0.353 ( 0.307) 0.162 0.190 112 9.33 0.67 0.371 ( 0.306) 0.171 0.200 113 9.42 0.67 0.371 ( 0.304) 0.171 0.200 114 9.50 0.67 0.371 ( 0.303) 0.171 0.200 115 9.58 0.70 0.390 ( 0.301) 0.179 0.210 116 9.67 0.70 0.390 ( 0.300) 0.179 0.210 117 9.75 0.70 0.390 ( 0.298) 0.179 0.210 118 9.83 0.73 0.408 ( 0.297) 0.188 0.220 119 9.92 0.73 0.408 ( 0.296) 0.188 0.220 120 10.00 0.73 0.408 ( 0.294) 0.188 0.220 121 10.08 0.50 0.278 ( 0.293) 0.128 0.150 122 10.17 0.50 0.278 ( 0.291) 0.128 0.150 123 10.25 0.50 0.278 ( 0.290) 0.128 0.150 124 10.33 0.50 0.278 ( 0.288) 0.128 0.150 125 10.42 0.50 0.278 ( 0.287) 0.128 0.150 126 10.50 0.50 0.278 ( 0.286) 0.128 0.150 127 10.58 0.67 0.371 ( 0.284) 0.171 0.200 128 10.67 0.67 0.371 ( 0.283) 0.171 0.200 129 10.75 0.67 0.371 ( 0.282) 0.171 0.200 130 10.83 0.67 0.371 ( 0.280) 0.171 0.200 131 10.92 0.67 0.371 ( 0.279) 0.171 0.200 132 11.00 0.67 0.371 ( 0.277) 0.171 0.200 133 11.08 0.63 0.353 ( 0.276) 0.162 0.190 134 11.17 0.63 0.353 ( 0.275) 0.162 0.190 135 11.25 0.63 0.353 ( 0.273) 0.162 0.190 136 11.33 0.63 0.353 ( 0.272) 0.162 0.190 137 11.42 0.63 0.353 ( 0.271) 0.162 0.190 138 11.50 0.63 0.353 ( 0.269) 0.162 0.190 139 11.58 0.57 0.316 ( 0.268) 0.145 0.170 140 11.67 0.57 0.316 ( 0.267) 0.145 0.170 141 11.75 0.57 0.316 ( 0.265) 0.145 0.170 1020 142 11.83 0.60 0.334 ( 0.264) 0.154 0.180 143 11.92 0.60 0.334 ( 0.263) 0.154 0.180 144 12.00 0.60 0.334 ( 0.261) 0.154 0.180 145 12.08 0.83 0.464 ( 0.260) 0.213 0.251 146 12.17 0.83 0.464 ( 0.259) 0.213 0.251 147 12.25 0.83 0.464 ( 0.257) 0.213 0.251 148 12.33 0.87 0.483 ( 0.256) 0.222 0.261 149 12.42 0.87 0.483 ( 0.255) 0.222 0.261 150 12.50 0.87 0.483 ( 0.254) 0.222 0.261 151 12.58 0.93 0.520 ( 0.252) 0.239 0.281 152 12.67 0.93 0.520 ( 0.251) 0.239 0.281 153 12.75 0.93 0.520 ( 0.250) 0.239 0.281 154 12.83 0.97 0.538 ( 0.248) 0.248 0.291 155 12.92 0.97 0.538 0.247 ( 0.248) 0.291 156 13.00 0.97 0.538 0.246 ( 0.248) 0.292 157 13.08 1.13 0.631 0.245 ( 0.290) 0.386 158 13.17 1.13 0.631 0.244 ( 0.290) 0.388 159 13.25 1.13 0.631 0.242 ( 0.290) 0.389 160 13.33 1.13 0.631 0.241 ( 0.290) 0.390 161 13.42 1.13 0.631 0.240 ( 0.290) 0.391 162 13.50 1.13 0.631 0.239 ( 0.290) 0.392 163 13.58 0.77 0.427 ( 0.237) 0.196 0.231 164 13.67 0.77 0.427 ( 0.236) 0.196 0.231 165 13.75 0.77 0.427 ( 0.235) 0.196 0.231 166 13.83 0.77 0.427 ( 0.234) 0.196 0.231 167 13.92 0.77 0.427 ( 0.233) 0.196 0.231 168 14.00 0.77 0.427 ( 0.231) 0.196 0.231 169 14.08 0.90 0.501 0.230 ( 0.231) 0.271 170 14.17 0.90 0.501 0.229 ( 0.231) 0.272 171 14.25 0.90 0.501 0.228 ( 0.231) 0.273 172 14.33 0.87 0.483 ( 0.227) 0.222 0.261 173 14.42 0.87 0.483 ( 0.226) 0.222 0.261 174 14.50 0.87 0.483 ( 0.224) 0.222 0.261 175 14.58 0.87 0.483 ( 0.223) 0.222 0.261 176 14.67 0.87 0.483 ( 0.222) 0.222 0.261 177 14.75 0.87 0.483 0.221 ( 0.222) 0.262 178 14.83 0.83 0.464 ( 0.220) 0.213 0.251 179 14.92 0.83 0.464 ( 0.219) 0.213 0.251 180 15.00 0.83 0.464 ( 0.218) 0.213 0.251 181 15.08 0.80 0.445 ( 0.216) 0.205 0.241 182 15.17 0.80 0.445 ( 0.215) 0.205 0.241 183 15.25 0.80 0.445 ( 0.214) 0.205 0.241 184 15.33 0.77 0.427 ( 0.213) 0.196 0.231 185 15.42 0.77 0.427 ( 0.212) 0.196 0.231 186 15.50 0.77 0.427 ( 0.211) 0.196 0.231 187 15.58 0.63 0.353 ( 0.210) 0.162 0.190 188 15.67 0.63 0.353 ( 0.209) 0.162 0.190 189 15.75 0.63 0.353 ( 0.208) 0.162 0.190 190 15.83 0.63 0.353 ( 0.207) 0.162 0.190 191 15.92 0.63 0.353 ( 0.206) 0.162 0.190 192 16.00 0.63 0.353 ( 0.205) 0.162 0.190 193 16.08 0.13 0.074 ( 0.204) 0.034 0.040 194 16.17 0.13 0.074 ( 0.202) 0.034 0.040 195 16.25 0.13 0.074 ( 0.201) 0.034 0.040 196 16.33 0.13 0.074 ( 0.200) 0.034 0.040 197 16.42 0.13 0.074 ( 0.199) 0.034 0.040 198 16.50 0.13 0.074 ( 0.198) 0.034 0.040 199 16.58 0.10 0.056 ( 0.197) 0.026 0.030 200 16.67 0.10 0.056 ( 0.196) 0.026 0.030 201 16.75 0.10 0.056 ( 0.195) 0.026 0.030 202 16.83 0.10 0.056 ( 0.194) 0.026 0.030 203 16.92 0.10 0.056 ( 0.193) 0.026 0.030 204 17.00 0.10 0.056 ( 0.192) 0.026 0.030 1021 205 17.08 0.17 0.093 ( 0.191) 0.043 0.050 206 17.17 0.17 0.093 ( 0.190) 0.043 0.050 207 17.25 0.17 0.093 ( 0.190) 0.043 0.050 208 17.33 0.17 0.093 ( 0.189) 0.043 0.050 209 17.42 0.17 0.093 ( 0.188) 0.043 0.050 210 17.50 0.17 0.093 ( 0.187) 0.043 0.050 211 17.58 0.17 0.093 ( 0.186) 0.043 0.050 212 17.67 0.17 0.093 ( 0.185) 0.043 0.050 213 17.75 0.17 0.093 ( 0.184) 0.043 0.050 214 17.83 0.13 0.074 ( 0.183) 0.034 0.040 215 17.92 0.13 0.074 ( 0.182) 0.034 0.040 216 18.00 0.13 0.074 ( 0.181) 0.034 0.040 217 18.08 0.13 0.074 ( 0.180) 0.034 0.040 218 18.17 0.13 0.074 ( 0.179) 0.034 0.040 219 18.25 0.13 0.074 ( 0.179) 0.034 0.040 220 18.33 0.13 0.074 ( 0.178) 0.034 0.040 221 18.42 0.13 0.074 ( 0.177) 0.034 0.040 222 18.50 0.13 0.074 ( 0.176) 0.034 0.040 223 18.58 0.10 0.056 ( 0.175) 0.026 0.030 224 18.67 0.10 0.056 ( 0.174) 0.026 0.030 225 18.75 0.10 0.056 ( 0.173) 0.026 0.030 226 18.83 0.07 0.037 ( 0.173) 0.017 0.020 227 18.92 0.07 0.037 ( 0.172) 0.017 0.020 228 19.00 0.07 0.037 ( 0.171) 0.017 0.020 229 19.08 0.10 0.056 ( 0.170) 0.026 0.030 230 19.17 0.10 0.056 ( 0.169) 0.026 0.030 231 19.25 0.10 0.056 ( 0.169) 0.026 0.030 232 19.33 0.13 0.074 ( 0.168) 0.034 0.040 233 19.42 0.13 0.074 ( 0.167) 0.034 0.040 234 19.50 0.13 0.074 ( 0.166) 0.034 0.040 235 19.58 0.10 0.056 ( 0.165) 0.026 0.030 236 19.67 0.10 0.056 ( 0.165) 0.026 0.030 237 19.75 0.10 0.056 ( 0.164) 0.026 0.030 238 19.83 0.07 0.037 ( 0.163) 0.017 0.020 239 19.92 0.07 0.037 ( 0.162) 0.017 0.020 240 20.00 0.07 0.037 ( 0.162) 0.017 0.020 241 20.08 0.10 0.056 ( 0.161) 0.026 0.030 242 20.17 0.10 0.056 ( 0.160) 0.026 0.030 243 20.25 0.10 0.056 ( 0.160) 0.026 0.030 244 20.33 0.10 0.056 ( 0.159) 0.026 0.030 245 20.42 0.10 0.056 ( 0.158) 0.026 0.030 246 20.50 0.10 0.056 ( 0.158) 0.026 0.030 247 20.58 0.10 0.056 ( 0.157) 0.026 0.030 248 20.67 0.10 0.056 ( 0.156) 0.026 0.030 249 20.75 0.10 0.056 ( 0.156) 0.026 0.030 250 20.83 0.07 0.037 ( 0.155) 0.017 0.020 251 20.92 0.07 0.037 ( 0.154) 0.017 0.020 252 21.00 0.07 0.037 ( 0.154) 0.017 0.020 253 21.08 0.10 0.056 ( 0.153) 0.026 0.030 254 21.17 0.10 0.056 ( 0.153) 0.026 0.030 255 21.25 0.10 0.056 ( 0.152) 0.026 0.030 256 21.33 0.07 0.037 ( 0.151) 0.017 0.020 257 21.42 0.07 0.037 ( 0.151) 0.017 0.020 258 21.50 0.07 0.037 ( 0.150) 0.017 0.020 259 21.58 0.10 0.056 ( 0.150) 0.026 0.030 260 21.67 0.10 0.056 ( 0.149) 0.026 0.030 261 21.75 0.10 0.056 ( 0.149) 0.026 0.030 262 21.83 0.07 0.037 ( 0.148) 0.017 0.020 263 21.92 0.07 0.037 ( 0.148) 0.017 0.020 264 22.00 0.07 0.037 ( 0.147) 0.017 0.020 265 22.08 0.10 0.056 ( 0.147) 0.026 0.030 266 22.17 0.10 0.056 ( 0.146) 0.026 0.030 267 22.25 0.10 0.056 ( 0.146) 0.026 0.030 1022 268 22.33 0.07 0.037 ( 0.145) 0.017 0.020 269 22.42 0.07 0.037 ( 0.145) 0.017 0.020 270 22.50 0.07 0.037 ( 0.144) 0.017 0.020 271 22.58 0.07 0.037 ( 0.144) 0.017 0.020 272 22.67 0.07 0.037 ( 0.144) 0.017 0.020 273 22.75 0.07 0.037 ( 0.143) 0.017 0.020 274 22.83 0.07 0.037 ( 0.143) 0.017 0.020 275 22.92 0.07 0.037 ( 0.142) 0.017 0.020 276 23.00 0.07 0.037 ( 0.142) 0.017 0.020 277 23.08 0.07 0.037 ( 0.142) 0.017 0.020 278 23.17 0.07 0.037 ( 0.141) 0.017 0.020 279 23.25 0.07 0.037 ( 0.141) 0.017 0.020 280 23.33 0.07 0.037 ( 0.141) 0.017 0.020 281 23.42 0.07 0.037 ( 0.141) 0.017 0.020 282 23.50 0.07 0.037 ( 0.140) 0.017 0.020 283 23.58 0.07 0.037 ( 0.140) 0.017 0.020 284 23.67 0.07 0.037 ( 0.140) 0.017 0.020 285 23.75 0.07 0.037 ( 0.140) 0.017 0.020 286 23.83 0.07 0.037 ( 0.140) 0.017 0.020 287 23.92 0.07 0.037 ( 0.139) 0.017 0.020 288 24.00 0.07 0.037 ( 0.139) 0.017 0.020 (Loss Rate Not Used) Sum = 100.0 Sum = 30.4 Flood volume = Effective rainfall 2.53(In) times area 16.9(Ac.)/[(In)/(Ft.)] = 3.6(Ac.Ft) Total soil loss = 2.11(In) Total soil loss = 2.971(Ac.Ft) Total rainfall = 4.64(In) Flood volume = 155234.9 Cubic Feet Total soil loss = 129405.8 Cubic Feet -------------------------------------------------------------------- Peak flow rate of this hydrograph = 6.412(CFS) -------------------------------------------------------------------- ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 24 - H O U R S T O R M R u n o f f H y d r o g r a p h -------------------------------------------------------------------- Hydrograph in 5 Minute intervals ((CFS)) -------------------------------------------------------------------- Time(h+m) Volume Ac.Ft Q(CFS) 0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 0+ 5 0.0001 0.01 Q | | | | 0+10 0.0008 0.11 Q | | | | 0+15 0.0023 0.21 Q | | | | 0+20 0.0041 0.26 VQ | | | | 0+25 0.0064 0.33 VQ | | | | 0+30 0.0092 0.40 VQ | | | | 0+35 0.0122 0.44 VQ | | | | 0+40 0.0153 0.46 VQ | | | | 0+45 0.0186 0.47 VQ | | | | 0+50 0.0220 0.49 VQ | | | | 0+55 0.0257 0.55 V Q | | | | 1+ 0 0.0299 0.60 V Q | | | | 1+ 5 0.0342 0.62 V Q | | | | 1+10 0.0383 0.59 V Q | | | | 1+15 0.0421 0.55 V Q | | | | 1+20 0.0458 0.54 V Q | | | | 1+25 0.0494 0.53 V Q | | | | 1+30 0.0530 0.53 V Q | | | | 1+35 0.0566 0.52 V Q | | | | 1+40 0.0602 0.52 V Q | | | | 1+45 0.0638 0.52 V Q | | | | 1023 1+50 0.0674 0.52 V Q | | | | 1+55 0.0713 0.57 V Q | | | | 2+ 0 0.0756 0.62 V Q | | | | 2+ 5 0.0800 0.64 V Q | | | | 2+10 0.0845 0.65 V Q | | | | 2+15 0.0891 0.66 V Q | | | | 2+20 0.0937 0.67 |VQ | | | | 2+25 0.0983 0.67 |VQ | | | | 2+30 0.1029 0.67 |VQ | | | | 2+35 0.1076 0.68 |VQ | | | | 2+40 0.1127 0.73 |VQ | | | | 2+45 0.1181 0.79 |V Q | | | | 2+50 0.1237 0.81 |V Q | | | | 2+55 0.1293 0.82 |V Q | | | | 3+ 0 0.1350 0.83 |V Q | | | | 3+ 5 0.1408 0.84 |V Q | | | | 3+10 0.1466 0.84 |V Q | | | | 3+15 0.1524 0.85 |V Q | | | | 3+20 0.1583 0.85 |V Q | | | | 3+25 0.1641 0.85 |V Q | | | | 3+30 0.1700 0.85 |V Q | | | | 3+35 0.1759 0.85 |V Q | | | | 3+40 0.1817 0.85 | VQ | | | | 3+45 0.1876 0.85 | VQ | | | | 3+50 0.1935 0.86 | VQ | | | | 3+55 0.1998 0.91 | VQ | | | | 4+ 0 0.2064 0.96 | VQ | | | | 4+ 5 0.2132 0.98 | VQ | | | | 4+10 0.2200 0.99 | VQ | | | | 4+15 0.2269 1.00 | V Q | | | | 4+20 0.2339 1.02 | V Q | | | | 4+25 0.2413 1.07 | V Q | | | | 4+30 0.2490 1.12 | V Q | | | | 4+35 0.2569 1.15 | V Q | | | | 4+40 0.2649 1.16 | V Q | | | | 4+45 0.2729 1.17 | VQ | | | | 4+50 0.2811 1.18 | VQ | | | | 4+55 0.2896 1.24 | VQ | | | | 5+ 0 0.2985 1.29 | V Q | | | | 5+ 5 0.3075 1.30 | V Q | | | | 5+10 0.3159 1.22 | VQ | | | | 5+15 0.3237 1.13 | VQ | | | | 5+20 0.3313 1.10 | VQ | | | | 5+25 0.3390 1.13 | VQ | | | | 5+30 0.3471 1.16 | VQ | | | | 5+35 0.3552 1.19 | VQ | | | | 5+40 0.3637 1.24 | Q | | | | 5+45 0.3726 1.29 | VQ | | | | 5+50 0.3817 1.32 | VQ | | | | 5+55 0.3909 1.33 | VQ | | | | 6+ 0 0.4001 1.34 | VQ | | | | 6+ 5 0.4095 1.36 | VQ | | | | 6+10 0.4191 1.41 | VQ | | | | 6+15 0.4292 1.46 | VQ | | | | 6+20 0.4394 1.49 | VQ | | | | 6+25 0.4498 1.50 | VQ | | | | 6+30 0.4602 1.51 | VQ | | | | 6+35 0.4707 1.53 | VQ | | | | 6+40 0.4816 1.58 | VQ | | | | 6+45 0.4928 1.63 | VQ | | | | 6+50 0.5042 1.66 | VQ | | | | 6+55 0.5158 1.67 | VQ | | | | 7+ 0 0.5273 1.68 | VQ | | | | 1024 7+ 5 0.5390 1.69 | Q | | | | 7+10 0.5507 1.70 | Q | | | | 7+15 0.5624 1.70 | Q | | | | 7+20 0.5741 1.71 | Q | | | | 7+25 0.5862 1.76 | VQ | | | | 7+30 0.5987 1.81 | VQ | | | | 7+35 0.6114 1.84 | VQ | | | | 7+40 0.6245 1.90 | Q | | | | 7+45 0.6380 1.96 | Q | | | | 7+50 0.6517 2.00 | Q | | | | 7+55 0.6659 2.06 | VQ | | | | 8+ 0 0.6806 2.12 | VQ | | | | 8+ 5 0.6955 2.17 | VQ | | | | 8+10 0.7112 2.28 | V Q| | | | 8+15 0.7277 2.40 | VQ| | | | 8+20 0.7446 2.45 | VQ| | | | 8+25 0.7617 2.48 | VQ| | | | 8+30 0.7790 2.51 | V Q | | | 8+35 0.7964 2.53 | V Q | | | 8+40 0.8142 2.59 | VQ | | | 8+45 0.8324 2.65 | VQ | | | 8+50 0.8509 2.68 | VQ | | | 8+55 0.8698 2.75 | VQ | | | 9+ 0 0.8891 2.81 | V|Q | | | 9+ 5 0.9088 2.85 | VQ | | | 9+10 0.9292 2.97 | VQ | | | 9+15 0.9505 3.08 | V Q | | | 9+20 0.9721 3.14 | V Q | | | 9+25 0.9943 3.22 | |VQ | | | 9+30 1.0170 3.29 | |V Q | | | 9+35 1.0400 3.34 | |V Q | | | 9+40 1.0635 3.41 | |V Q | | | 9+45 1.0874 3.48 | | VQ | | | 9+50 1.1117 3.52 | | V Q | | | 9+55 1.1364 3.59 | | V Q | | | 10+ 0 1.1616 3.65 | | VQ | | | 10+ 5 1.1866 3.64 | | VQ | | | 10+10 1.2095 3.33 | | Q | | | 10+15 1.2301 2.99 | |Q V | | | 10+20 1.2497 2.84 | |Q V | | | 10+25 1.2687 2.76 | |Q V | | | 10+30 1.2873 2.70 | Q V | | | 10+35 1.3059 2.70 | Q V | | | 10+40 1.3260 2.91 | |Q V | | | 10+45 1.3476 3.14 | | Q V | | | 10+50 1.3699 3.24 | | Q V | | | 10+55 1.3926 3.29 | | Q V | | | 11+ 0 1.4155 3.33 | | Q V | | | 11+ 5 1.4385 3.34 | | Q V | | | 11+10 1.4613 3.31 | | Q V | | | 11+15 1.4838 3.27 | | Q V | | | 11+20 1.5063 3.26 | | Q V | | | 11+25 1.5287 3.25 | | Q V | | | 11+30 1.5511 3.25 | | Q V | | | 11+35 1.5734 3.24 | | Q V | | | 11+40 1.5950 3.14 | | Q V | | | 11+45 1.6160 3.04 | | Q V | | | 11+50 1.6366 3.00 | | Q V | | | 11+55 1.6575 3.02 | | Q V | | | 12+ 0 1.6785 3.06 | | Q V | | | 12+ 5 1.7000 3.11 | | Q V| | | 12+10 1.7237 3.45 | | Q V| | | 12+15 1.7499 3.81 | | Q V| | | 1025 12+20 1.7772 3.97 | | Q V| | | 12+25 1.8055 4.11 | | Q V | | 12+30 1.8346 4.22 | | Q V | | 12+35 1.8642 4.30 | | Q V | | 12+40 1.8947 4.43 | | Q |V | | 12+45 1.9262 4.57 | | Q |V | | 12+50 1.9581 4.64 | | Q |V | | 12+55 1.9907 4.73 | | Q | V | | 13+ 0 2.0239 4.82 | | Q| V | | 13+ 5 2.0579 4.93 | | Q| V | | 13+10 2.0952 5.42 | | |Q V | | 13+15 2.1359 5.92 | | | Q | | 13+20 2.1784 6.16 | | | Q | | 13+25 2.2218 6.31 | | | VQ | | 13+30 2.2660 6.41 | | | Q | | 13+35 2.3099 6.38 | | | Q | | 13+40 2.3489 5.67 | | | Q V | | 13+45 2.3826 4.89 | | Q| V | | 13+50 2.4140 4.56 | | Q | V | | 13+55 2.4442 4.37 | | Q | V | | 14+ 0 2.4734 4.25 | | Q | V | | 14+ 5 2.5023 4.19 | | Q | V | | 14+10 2.5321 4.32 | | Q | V | | 14+15 2.5630 4.49 | | Q | V | | 14+20 2.5943 4.55 | | Q | V| | 14+25 2.6254 4.52 | | Q | V| | 14+30 2.6562 4.48 | | Q | V| | 14+35 2.6869 4.46 | | Q | V | 14+40 2.7175 4.44 | | Q | V | 14+45 2.7481 4.44 | | Q | V | 14+50 2.7786 4.43 | | Q | |V | 14+55 2.8089 4.39 | | Q | |V | 15+ 0 2.8387 4.33 | | Q | |V | 15+ 5 2.8684 4.31 | | Q | | V | 15+10 2.8976 4.25 | | Q | | V | 15+15 2.9265 4.19 | | Q | | V | 15+20 2.9551 4.15 | | Q | | V | 15+25 2.9832 4.09 | | Q | | V | 15+30 3.0109 4.02 | | Q | | V | 15+35 3.0383 3.97 | | Q | | V | 15+40 3.0641 3.76 | | Q | | V | 15+45 3.0885 3.54 | | Q | | V | 15+50 3.1122 3.44 | | Q | | V | 15+55 3.1355 3.38 | | Q | | V | 16+ 0 3.1586 3.34 | | Q | | V | 16+ 5 3.1807 3.21 | | Q | | V | 16+10 3.1978 2.48 | Q| | | V | 16+15 3.2095 1.71 | Q | | | V | 16+20 3.2189 1.36 | Q | | | V | 16+25 3.2269 1.16 | Q | | | V | 16+30 3.2340 1.03 | Q | | | V | 16+35 3.2403 0.93 | Q | | | V | 16+40 3.2459 0.81 | Q | | | V | 16+45 3.2508 0.71 | Q | | | V | 16+50 3.2552 0.65 | Q | | | V | 16+55 3.2594 0.61 | Q | | | V | 17+ 0 3.2634 0.58 | Q | | | V | 17+ 5 3.2673 0.57 | Q | | | V | 17+10 3.2718 0.65 | Q | | | V | 17+15 3.2769 0.74 | Q | | | V | 17+20 3.2822 0.77 | Q | | | V | 17+25 3.2877 0.80 | Q | | | V | 17+30 3.2933 0.81 | Q | | | V | 1026 17+35 3.2990 0.82 | Q | | | V | 17+40 3.3047 0.83 | Q | | | V | 17+45 3.3105 0.84 | Q | | | V | 17+50 3.3162 0.84 | Q | | | V | 17+55 3.3217 0.79 | Q | | | V | 18+ 0 3.3268 0.74 | Q | | | V | 18+ 5 3.3318 0.72 | Q | | | V | 18+10 3.3367 0.71 | Q | | | V | 18+15 3.3415 0.70 | Q | | | V | 18+20 3.3463 0.70 | Q | | | V | 18+25 3.3511 0.69 | Q | | | V | 18+30 3.3559 0.69 | Q | | | V | 18+35 3.3606 0.68 | Q | | | V | 18+40 3.3649 0.63 | Q | | | V | 18+45 3.3689 0.58 | Q | | | V | 18+50 3.3727 0.55 | Q | | | V | 18+55 3.3761 0.49 |Q | | | V | 19+ 0 3.3791 0.43 |Q | | | V | 19+ 5 3.3819 0.41 |Q | | | V | 19+10 3.3849 0.44 |Q | | | V | 19+15 3.3882 0.48 |Q | | | V | 19+20 3.3916 0.50 |Q | | | V | 19+25 3.3954 0.55 | Q | | | V | 19+30 3.3996 0.61 | Q | | | V | 19+35 3.4039 0.62 | Q | | | V | 19+40 3.4080 0.59 | Q | | | V | 19+45 3.4118 0.55 | Q | | | V | 19+50 3.4154 0.53 | Q | | | V | 19+55 3.4187 0.47 |Q | | | V | 20+ 0 3.4215 0.42 |Q | | | V | 20+ 5 3.4243 0.40 |Q | | | V | 20+10 3.4273 0.43 |Q | | | V | 20+15 3.4305 0.47 |Q | | | V | 20+20 3.4339 0.49 |Q | | | V | 20+25 3.4373 0.50 |Q | | | V | 20+30 3.4408 0.50 | Q | | | V | 20+35 3.4443 0.50 | Q | | | V | 20+40 3.4477 0.51 | Q | | | V | 20+45 3.4512 0.51 | Q | | | V | 20+50 3.4547 0.50 | Q | | | V | 20+55 3.4578 0.45 |Q | | | V | 21+ 0 3.4606 0.40 |Q | | | V | 21+ 5 3.4633 0.39 |Q | | | V | 21+10 3.4662 0.43 |Q | | | V | 21+15 3.4695 0.47 |Q | | | V | 21+20 3.4727 0.48 |Q | | | V | 21+25 3.4758 0.44 |Q | | | V| 21+30 3.4785 0.39 |Q | | | V| 21+35 3.4811 0.38 |Q | | | V| 21+40 3.4840 0.42 |Q | | | V| 21+45 3.4872 0.46 |Q | | | V| 21+50 3.4904 0.47 |Q | | | V| 21+55 3.4935 0.44 |Q | | | V| 22+ 0 3.4961 0.39 |Q | | | V| 22+ 5 3.4988 0.38 |Q | | | V| 22+10 3.5016 0.42 |Q | | | V| 22+15 3.5048 0.46 |Q | | | V| 22+20 3.5081 0.47 |Q | | | V| 22+25 3.5111 0.44 |Q | | | V| 22+30 3.5138 0.39 |Q | | | V| 22+35 3.5164 0.37 |Q | | | V| 22+40 3.5189 0.36 |Q | | | V| 22+45 3.5213 0.36 |Q | | | V| 1027 22+50 3.5238 0.35 |Q | | | V| 22+55 3.5262 0.35 |Q | | | V| 23+ 0 3.5286 0.35 |Q | | | V| 23+ 5 3.5309 0.35 |Q | | | V| 23+10 3.5333 0.34 |Q | | | V| 23+15 3.5357 0.34 |Q | | | V| 23+20 3.5381 0.34 |Q | | | V| 23+25 3.5404 0.34 |Q | | | V| 23+30 3.5428 0.34 |Q | | | V| 23+35 3.5451 0.34 |Q | | | V| 23+40 3.5475 0.34 |Q | | | V| 23+45 3.5498 0.34 |Q | | | V| 23+50 3.5522 0.34 |Q | | | V| 23+55 3.5545 0.34 |Q | | | V| 24+ 0 3.5569 0.34 |Q | | | V| 24+ 5 3.5591 0.33 |Q | | | V| 24+10 3.5607 0.23 Q | | | V| 24+15 3.5616 0.13 Q | | | V| 24+20 3.5622 0.09 Q | | | V| 24+25 3.5627 0.06 Q | | | V| 24+30 3.5630 0.04 Q | | | V| 24+35 3.5632 0.03 Q | | | V| 24+40 3.5634 0.02 Q | | | V| 24+45 3.5635 0.02 Q | | | V| 24+50 3.5636 0.01 Q | | | V| 24+55 3.5636 0.01 Q | | | V| 25+ 0 3.5637 0.01 Q | | | V| 25+ 5 3.5637 0.00 Q | | | V| 25+10 3.5637 0.00 Q | | | V| 25+15 3.5637 0.00 Q | | | V| ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 1028 U n i t H y d r o g r a p h A n a l y s i s Copyright (c) CIVILCADD/CIVILDESIGN, 1989 - 2018, Version 9.0 Study date 10/06/23 File: SHADRB24100.out ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Riverside County Synthetic Unit Hydrology Method RCFC & WCD Manual date - April 1978 Program License Serial Number 6615 --------------------------------------------------------------------- English (in-lb) Input Units Used English Rainfall Data (Inches) Input Values Used English Units used in output format --------------------------------------------------------------------- TOLL RESIDENCES AT SHADOW RIDGE PALM DESERT DMA B 100-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM VOLUME BY KAM 100623 -------------------------------------------------------------------- Drainage Area = 3.90(Ac.) = 0.006 Sq. Mi. Drainage Area for Depth-Area Areal Adjustment = 3.90(Ac.) = 0.006 Sq. Mi. USER Entry of lag time in hours Lag time = 0.133 Hr. Lag time = 7.98 Min. 25% of lag time = 2.00 Min. 40% of lag time = 3.19 Min. Unit time = 5.00 Min. Duration of storm = 24 Hour(s) User Entered Base Flow = 0.00(CFS) 2 YEAR Area rainfall data: Area(Ac.)[1] Rainfall(In)[2] Weighting[1*2] 3.90 1.18 4.60 100 YEAR Area rainfall data: Area(Ac.)[1] Rainfall(In)[2] Weighting[1*2] 3.90 4.64 18.10 STORM EVENT (YEAR) = 100.00 Area Averaged 2-Year Rainfall = 1.180(In) Area Averaged 100-Year Rainfall = 4.640(In) Point rain (area averaged) = 4.640(In) Areal adjustment factor = 100.00 % Adjusted average point rain = 4.640(In) Sub-Area Data: 1029 Area(Ac.) Runoff Index Impervious % 3.900 32.00 0.530 Total Area Entered = 3.90(Ac.) RI RI Infil. Rate Impervious Adj. Infil. Rate Area% F AMC2 AMC-3 (In/Hr) (Dec.%) (In/Hr) (Dec.) (In/Hr) 32.0 52.0 0.552 0.530 0.288 1.000 0.288 Sum (F) = 0.288 Area averaged mean soil loss (F) (In/Hr) = 0.288 Minimum soil loss rate ((In/Hr)) = 0.144 (for 24 hour storm duration) Soil low loss rate (decimal) = 0.480 --------------------------------------------------------------------- U n i t H y d r o g r a p h DESERT S-Curve -------------------------------------------------------------------- Unit Hydrograph Data --------------------------------------------------------------------- Unit time period Time % of lag Distribution Unit Hydrograph (hrs) Graph % (CFS) --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 0.083 62.657 6.101 0.240 2 0.167 125.313 37.989 1.493 3 0.250 187.970 25.591 1.006 4 0.333 250.627 10.999 0.432 5 0.417 313.283 6.472 0.254 6 0.500 375.940 4.098 0.161 7 0.583 438.596 2.850 0.112 8 0.667 501.253 2.009 0.079 9 0.750 563.910 1.364 0.054 10 0.833 626.566 0.790 0.031 11 0.917 689.223 0.731 0.029 12 1.000 751.880 0.628 0.025 13 1.083 814.536 0.377 0.015 Sum = 100.000 Sum= 3.930 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- The following loss rate calculations reflect use of the minimum calculated loss rate subtracted from the Storm Rain to produce the maximum Effective Rain value Unit Time Pattern Storm Rain Loss rate(In./Hr) Effective (Hr.) Percent (In/Hr) Max | Low (In/Hr) 1 0.08 0.07 0.037 ( 0.511) 0.018 0.019 2 0.17 0.07 0.037 ( 0.509) 0.018 0.019 3 0.25 0.07 0.037 ( 0.507) 0.018 0.019 4 0.33 0.10 0.056 ( 0.505) 0.027 0.029 5 0.42 0.10 0.056 ( 0.504) 0.027 0.029 6 0.50 0.10 0.056 ( 0.502) 0.027 0.029 7 0.58 0.10 0.056 ( 0.500) 0.027 0.029 8 0.67 0.10 0.056 ( 0.498) 0.027 0.029 9 0.75 0.10 0.056 ( 0.496) 0.027 0.029 10 0.83 0.13 0.074 ( 0.494) 0.036 0.039 11 0.92 0.13 0.074 ( 0.492) 0.036 0.039 12 1.00 0.13 0.074 ( 0.490) 0.036 0.039 13 1.08 0.10 0.056 ( 0.488) 0.027 0.029 14 1.17 0.10 0.056 ( 0.486) 0.027 0.029 15 1.25 0.10 0.056 ( 0.484) 0.027 0.029 16 1.33 0.10 0.056 ( 0.482) 0.027 0.029 17 1.42 0.10 0.056 ( 0.480) 0.027 0.029 18 1.50 0.10 0.056 ( 0.478) 0.027 0.029 1030 19 1.58 0.10 0.056 ( 0.476) 0.027 0.029 20 1.67 0.10 0.056 ( 0.474) 0.027 0.029 21 1.75 0.10 0.056 ( 0.473) 0.027 0.029 22 1.83 0.13 0.074 ( 0.471) 0.036 0.039 23 1.92 0.13 0.074 ( 0.469) 0.036 0.039 24 2.00 0.13 0.074 ( 0.467) 0.036 0.039 25 2.08 0.13 0.074 ( 0.465) 0.036 0.039 26 2.17 0.13 0.074 ( 0.463) 0.036 0.039 27 2.25 0.13 0.074 ( 0.461) 0.036 0.039 28 2.33 0.13 0.074 ( 0.459) 0.036 0.039 29 2.42 0.13 0.074 ( 0.457) 0.036 0.039 30 2.50 0.13 0.074 ( 0.456) 0.036 0.039 31 2.58 0.17 0.093 ( 0.454) 0.045 0.048 32 2.67 0.17 0.093 ( 0.452) 0.045 0.048 33 2.75 0.17 0.093 ( 0.450) 0.045 0.048 34 2.83 0.17 0.093 ( 0.448) 0.045 0.048 35 2.92 0.17 0.093 ( 0.446) 0.045 0.048 36 3.00 0.17 0.093 ( 0.444) 0.045 0.048 37 3.08 0.17 0.093 ( 0.443) 0.045 0.048 38 3.17 0.17 0.093 ( 0.441) 0.045 0.048 39 3.25 0.17 0.093 ( 0.439) 0.045 0.048 40 3.33 0.17 0.093 ( 0.437) 0.045 0.048 41 3.42 0.17 0.093 ( 0.435) 0.045 0.048 42 3.50 0.17 0.093 ( 0.434) 0.045 0.048 43 3.58 0.17 0.093 ( 0.432) 0.045 0.048 44 3.67 0.17 0.093 ( 0.430) 0.045 0.048 45 3.75 0.17 0.093 ( 0.428) 0.045 0.048 46 3.83 0.20 0.111 ( 0.426) 0.053 0.058 47 3.92 0.20 0.111 ( 0.424) 0.053 0.058 48 4.00 0.20 0.111 ( 0.423) 0.053 0.058 49 4.08 0.20 0.111 ( 0.421) 0.053 0.058 50 4.17 0.20 0.111 ( 0.419) 0.053 0.058 51 4.25 0.20 0.111 ( 0.417) 0.053 0.058 52 4.33 0.23 0.130 ( 0.416) 0.062 0.068 53 4.42 0.23 0.130 ( 0.414) 0.062 0.068 54 4.50 0.23 0.130 ( 0.412) 0.062 0.068 55 4.58 0.23 0.130 ( 0.410) 0.062 0.068 56 4.67 0.23 0.130 ( 0.408) 0.062 0.068 57 4.75 0.23 0.130 ( 0.407) 0.062 0.068 58 4.83 0.27 0.148 ( 0.405) 0.071 0.077 59 4.92 0.27 0.148 ( 0.403) 0.071 0.077 60 5.00 0.27 0.148 ( 0.401) 0.071 0.077 61 5.08 0.20 0.111 ( 0.400) 0.053 0.058 62 5.17 0.20 0.111 ( 0.398) 0.053 0.058 63 5.25 0.20 0.111 ( 0.396) 0.053 0.058 64 5.33 0.23 0.130 ( 0.394) 0.062 0.068 65 5.42 0.23 0.130 ( 0.393) 0.062 0.068 66 5.50 0.23 0.130 ( 0.391) 0.062 0.068 67 5.58 0.27 0.148 ( 0.389) 0.071 0.077 68 5.67 0.27 0.148 ( 0.388) 0.071 0.077 69 5.75 0.27 0.148 ( 0.386) 0.071 0.077 70 5.83 0.27 0.148 ( 0.384) 0.071 0.077 71 5.92 0.27 0.148 ( 0.382) 0.071 0.077 72 6.00 0.27 0.148 ( 0.381) 0.071 0.077 73 6.08 0.30 0.167 ( 0.379) 0.080 0.087 74 6.17 0.30 0.167 ( 0.377) 0.080 0.087 75 6.25 0.30 0.167 ( 0.376) 0.080 0.087 76 6.33 0.30 0.167 ( 0.374) 0.080 0.087 77 6.42 0.30 0.167 ( 0.372) 0.080 0.087 78 6.50 0.30 0.167 ( 0.371) 0.080 0.087 79 6.58 0.33 0.186 ( 0.369) 0.089 0.097 80 6.67 0.33 0.186 ( 0.367) 0.089 0.097 81 6.75 0.33 0.186 ( 0.366) 0.089 0.097 1031 82 6.83 0.33 0.186 ( 0.364) 0.089 0.097 83 6.92 0.33 0.186 ( 0.362) 0.089 0.097 84 7.00 0.33 0.186 ( 0.361) 0.089 0.097 85 7.08 0.33 0.186 ( 0.359) 0.089 0.097 86 7.17 0.33 0.186 ( 0.358) 0.089 0.097 87 7.25 0.33 0.186 ( 0.356) 0.089 0.097 88 7.33 0.37 0.204 ( 0.354) 0.098 0.106 89 7.42 0.37 0.204 ( 0.353) 0.098 0.106 90 7.50 0.37 0.204 ( 0.351) 0.098 0.106 91 7.58 0.40 0.223 ( 0.349) 0.107 0.116 92 7.67 0.40 0.223 ( 0.348) 0.107 0.116 93 7.75 0.40 0.223 ( 0.346) 0.107 0.116 94 7.83 0.43 0.241 ( 0.345) 0.116 0.125 95 7.92 0.43 0.241 ( 0.343) 0.116 0.125 96 8.00 0.43 0.241 ( 0.341) 0.116 0.125 97 8.08 0.50 0.278 ( 0.340) 0.134 0.145 98 8.17 0.50 0.278 ( 0.338) 0.134 0.145 99 8.25 0.50 0.278 ( 0.337) 0.134 0.145 100 8.33 0.50 0.278 ( 0.335) 0.134 0.145 101 8.42 0.50 0.278 ( 0.334) 0.134 0.145 102 8.50 0.50 0.278 ( 0.332) 0.134 0.145 103 8.58 0.53 0.297 ( 0.330) 0.143 0.154 104 8.67 0.53 0.297 ( 0.329) 0.143 0.154 105 8.75 0.53 0.297 ( 0.327) 0.143 0.154 106 8.83 0.57 0.316 ( 0.326) 0.151 0.164 107 8.92 0.57 0.316 ( 0.324) 0.151 0.164 108 9.00 0.57 0.316 ( 0.323) 0.151 0.164 109 9.08 0.63 0.353 ( 0.321) 0.169 0.183 110 9.17 0.63 0.353 ( 0.320) 0.169 0.183 111 9.25 0.63 0.353 ( 0.318) 0.169 0.183 112 9.33 0.67 0.371 ( 0.317) 0.178 0.193 113 9.42 0.67 0.371 ( 0.315) 0.178 0.193 114 9.50 0.67 0.371 ( 0.314) 0.178 0.193 115 9.58 0.70 0.390 ( 0.312) 0.187 0.203 116 9.67 0.70 0.390 ( 0.311) 0.187 0.203 117 9.75 0.70 0.390 ( 0.309) 0.187 0.203 118 9.83 0.73 0.408 ( 0.308) 0.196 0.212 119 9.92 0.73 0.408 ( 0.306) 0.196 0.212 120 10.00 0.73 0.408 ( 0.305) 0.196 0.212 121 10.08 0.50 0.278 ( 0.303) 0.134 0.145 122 10.17 0.50 0.278 ( 0.302) 0.134 0.145 123 10.25 0.50 0.278 ( 0.300) 0.134 0.145 124 10.33 0.50 0.278 ( 0.299) 0.134 0.145 125 10.42 0.50 0.278 ( 0.297) 0.134 0.145 126 10.50 0.50 0.278 ( 0.296) 0.134 0.145 127 10.58 0.67 0.371 ( 0.294) 0.178 0.193 128 10.67 0.67 0.371 ( 0.293) 0.178 0.193 129 10.75 0.67 0.371 ( 0.292) 0.178 0.193 130 10.83 0.67 0.371 ( 0.290) 0.178 0.193 131 10.92 0.67 0.371 ( 0.289) 0.178 0.193 132 11.00 0.67 0.371 ( 0.287) 0.178 0.193 133 11.08 0.63 0.353 ( 0.286) 0.169 0.183 134 11.17 0.63 0.353 ( 0.284) 0.169 0.183 135 11.25 0.63 0.353 ( 0.283) 0.169 0.183 136 11.33 0.63 0.353 ( 0.282) 0.169 0.183 137 11.42 0.63 0.353 ( 0.280) 0.169 0.183 138 11.50 0.63 0.353 ( 0.279) 0.169 0.183 139 11.58 0.57 0.316 ( 0.277) 0.151 0.164 140 11.67 0.57 0.316 ( 0.276) 0.151 0.164 141 11.75 0.57 0.316 ( 0.275) 0.151 0.164 142 11.83 0.60 0.334 ( 0.273) 0.160 0.174 143 11.92 0.60 0.334 ( 0.272) 0.160 0.174 144 12.00 0.60 0.334 ( 0.271) 0.160 0.174 1032 145 12.08 0.83 0.464 ( 0.269) 0.223 0.241 146 12.17 0.83 0.464 ( 0.268) 0.223 0.241 147 12.25 0.83 0.464 ( 0.267) 0.223 0.241 148 12.33 0.87 0.483 ( 0.265) 0.232 0.251 149 12.42 0.87 0.483 ( 0.264) 0.232 0.251 150 12.50 0.87 0.483 ( 0.263) 0.232 0.251 151 12.58 0.93 0.520 ( 0.261) 0.249 0.270 152 12.67 0.93 0.520 ( 0.260) 0.249 0.270 153 12.75 0.93 0.520 ( 0.259) 0.249 0.270 154 12.83 0.97 0.538 0.257 ( 0.258) 0.281 155 12.92 0.97 0.538 0.256 ( 0.258) 0.282 156 13.00 0.97 0.538 0.255 ( 0.258) 0.283 157 13.08 1.13 0.631 0.253 ( 0.303) 0.378 158 13.17 1.13 0.631 0.252 ( 0.303) 0.379 159 13.25 1.13 0.631 0.251 ( 0.303) 0.380 160 13.33 1.13 0.631 0.250 ( 0.303) 0.381 161 13.42 1.13 0.631 0.248 ( 0.303) 0.383 162 13.50 1.13 0.631 0.247 ( 0.303) 0.384 163 13.58 0.77 0.427 ( 0.246) 0.205 0.222 164 13.67 0.77 0.427 ( 0.245) 0.205 0.222 165 13.75 0.77 0.427 ( 0.243) 0.205 0.222 166 13.83 0.77 0.427 ( 0.242) 0.205 0.222 167 13.92 0.77 0.427 ( 0.241) 0.205 0.222 168 14.00 0.77 0.427 ( 0.240) 0.205 0.222 169 14.08 0.90 0.501 0.238 ( 0.241) 0.263 170 14.17 0.90 0.501 0.237 ( 0.241) 0.264 171 14.25 0.90 0.501 0.236 ( 0.241) 0.265 172 14.33 0.87 0.483 ( 0.235) 0.232 0.251 173 14.42 0.87 0.483 ( 0.234) 0.232 0.251 174 14.50 0.87 0.483 ( 0.232) 0.232 0.251 175 14.58 0.87 0.483 0.231 ( 0.232) 0.251 176 14.67 0.87 0.483 0.230 ( 0.232) 0.253 177 14.75 0.87 0.483 0.229 ( 0.232) 0.254 178 14.83 0.83 0.464 ( 0.228) 0.223 0.241 179 14.92 0.83 0.464 ( 0.226) 0.223 0.241 180 15.00 0.83 0.464 ( 0.225) 0.223 0.241 181 15.08 0.80 0.445 ( 0.224) 0.214 0.232 182 15.17 0.80 0.445 ( 0.223) 0.214 0.232 183 15.25 0.80 0.445 ( 0.222) 0.214 0.232 184 15.33 0.77 0.427 ( 0.221) 0.205 0.222 185 15.42 0.77 0.427 ( 0.220) 0.205 0.222 186 15.50 0.77 0.427 ( 0.218) 0.205 0.222 187 15.58 0.63 0.353 ( 0.217) 0.169 0.183 188 15.67 0.63 0.353 ( 0.216) 0.169 0.183 189 15.75 0.63 0.353 ( 0.215) 0.169 0.183 190 15.83 0.63 0.353 ( 0.214) 0.169 0.183 191 15.92 0.63 0.353 ( 0.213) 0.169 0.183 192 16.00 0.63 0.353 ( 0.212) 0.169 0.183 193 16.08 0.13 0.074 ( 0.211) 0.036 0.039 194 16.17 0.13 0.074 ( 0.210) 0.036 0.039 195 16.25 0.13 0.074 ( 0.209) 0.036 0.039 196 16.33 0.13 0.074 ( 0.208) 0.036 0.039 197 16.42 0.13 0.074 ( 0.206) 0.036 0.039 198 16.50 0.13 0.074 ( 0.205) 0.036 0.039 199 16.58 0.10 0.056 ( 0.204) 0.027 0.029 200 16.67 0.10 0.056 ( 0.203) 0.027 0.029 201 16.75 0.10 0.056 ( 0.202) 0.027 0.029 202 16.83 0.10 0.056 ( 0.201) 0.027 0.029 203 16.92 0.10 0.056 ( 0.200) 0.027 0.029 204 17.00 0.10 0.056 ( 0.199) 0.027 0.029 205 17.08 0.17 0.093 ( 0.198) 0.045 0.048 206 17.17 0.17 0.093 ( 0.197) 0.045 0.048 207 17.25 0.17 0.093 ( 0.196) 0.045 0.048 1033 208 17.33 0.17 0.093 ( 0.195) 0.045 0.048 209 17.42 0.17 0.093 ( 0.194) 0.045 0.048 210 17.50 0.17 0.093 ( 0.193) 0.045 0.048 211 17.58 0.17 0.093 ( 0.192) 0.045 0.048 212 17.67 0.17 0.093 ( 0.191) 0.045 0.048 213 17.75 0.17 0.093 ( 0.190) 0.045 0.048 214 17.83 0.13 0.074 ( 0.190) 0.036 0.039 215 17.92 0.13 0.074 ( 0.189) 0.036 0.039 216 18.00 0.13 0.074 ( 0.188) 0.036 0.039 217 18.08 0.13 0.074 ( 0.187) 0.036 0.039 218 18.17 0.13 0.074 ( 0.186) 0.036 0.039 219 18.25 0.13 0.074 ( 0.185) 0.036 0.039 220 18.33 0.13 0.074 ( 0.184) 0.036 0.039 221 18.42 0.13 0.074 ( 0.183) 0.036 0.039 222 18.50 0.13 0.074 ( 0.182) 0.036 0.039 223 18.58 0.10 0.056 ( 0.181) 0.027 0.029 224 18.67 0.10 0.056 ( 0.180) 0.027 0.029 225 18.75 0.10 0.056 ( 0.180) 0.027 0.029 226 18.83 0.07 0.037 ( 0.179) 0.018 0.019 227 18.92 0.07 0.037 ( 0.178) 0.018 0.019 228 19.00 0.07 0.037 ( 0.177) 0.018 0.019 229 19.08 0.10 0.056 ( 0.176) 0.027 0.029 230 19.17 0.10 0.056 ( 0.175) 0.027 0.029 231 19.25 0.10 0.056 ( 0.175) 0.027 0.029 232 19.33 0.13 0.074 ( 0.174) 0.036 0.039 233 19.42 0.13 0.074 ( 0.173) 0.036 0.039 234 19.50 0.13 0.074 ( 0.172) 0.036 0.039 235 19.58 0.10 0.056 ( 0.171) 0.027 0.029 236 19.67 0.10 0.056 ( 0.171) 0.027 0.029 237 19.75 0.10 0.056 ( 0.170) 0.027 0.029 238 19.83 0.07 0.037 ( 0.169) 0.018 0.019 239 19.92 0.07 0.037 ( 0.168) 0.018 0.019 240 20.00 0.07 0.037 ( 0.168) 0.018 0.019 241 20.08 0.10 0.056 ( 0.167) 0.027 0.029 242 20.17 0.10 0.056 ( 0.166) 0.027 0.029 243 20.25 0.10 0.056 ( 0.165) 0.027 0.029 244 20.33 0.10 0.056 ( 0.165) 0.027 0.029 245 20.42 0.10 0.056 ( 0.164) 0.027 0.029 246 20.50 0.10 0.056 ( 0.163) 0.027 0.029 247 20.58 0.10 0.056 ( 0.163) 0.027 0.029 248 20.67 0.10 0.056 ( 0.162) 0.027 0.029 249 20.75 0.10 0.056 ( 0.161) 0.027 0.029 250 20.83 0.07 0.037 ( 0.161) 0.018 0.019 251 20.92 0.07 0.037 ( 0.160) 0.018 0.019 252 21.00 0.07 0.037 ( 0.159) 0.018 0.019 253 21.08 0.10 0.056 ( 0.159) 0.027 0.029 254 21.17 0.10 0.056 ( 0.158) 0.027 0.029 255 21.25 0.10 0.056 ( 0.157) 0.027 0.029 256 21.33 0.07 0.037 ( 0.157) 0.018 0.019 257 21.42 0.07 0.037 ( 0.156) 0.018 0.019 258 21.50 0.07 0.037 ( 0.156) 0.018 0.019 259 21.58 0.10 0.056 ( 0.155) 0.027 0.029 260 21.67 0.10 0.056 ( 0.154) 0.027 0.029 261 21.75 0.10 0.056 ( 0.154) 0.027 0.029 262 21.83 0.07 0.037 ( 0.153) 0.018 0.019 263 21.92 0.07 0.037 ( 0.153) 0.018 0.019 264 22.00 0.07 0.037 ( 0.152) 0.018 0.019 265 22.08 0.10 0.056 ( 0.152) 0.027 0.029 266 22.17 0.10 0.056 ( 0.151) 0.027 0.029 267 22.25 0.10 0.056 ( 0.151) 0.027 0.029 268 22.33 0.07 0.037 ( 0.150) 0.018 0.019 269 22.42 0.07 0.037 ( 0.150) 0.018 0.019 270 22.50 0.07 0.037 ( 0.149) 0.018 0.019 1034 271 22.58 0.07 0.037 ( 0.149) 0.018 0.019 272 22.67 0.07 0.037 ( 0.149) 0.018 0.019 273 22.75 0.07 0.037 ( 0.148) 0.018 0.019 274 22.83 0.07 0.037 ( 0.148) 0.018 0.019 275 22.92 0.07 0.037 ( 0.147) 0.018 0.019 276 23.00 0.07 0.037 ( 0.147) 0.018 0.019 277 23.08 0.07 0.037 ( 0.147) 0.018 0.019 278 23.17 0.07 0.037 ( 0.146) 0.018 0.019 279 23.25 0.07 0.037 ( 0.146) 0.018 0.019 280 23.33 0.07 0.037 ( 0.146) 0.018 0.019 281 23.42 0.07 0.037 ( 0.146) 0.018 0.019 282 23.50 0.07 0.037 ( 0.145) 0.018 0.019 283 23.58 0.07 0.037 ( 0.145) 0.018 0.019 284 23.67 0.07 0.037 ( 0.145) 0.018 0.019 285 23.75 0.07 0.037 ( 0.145) 0.018 0.019 286 23.83 0.07 0.037 ( 0.144) 0.018 0.019 287 23.92 0.07 0.037 ( 0.144) 0.018 0.019 288 24.00 0.07 0.037 ( 0.144) 0.018 0.019 (Loss Rate Not Used) Sum = 100.0 Sum = 29.3 Flood volume = Effective rainfall 2.44(In) times area 3.9(Ac.)/[(In)/(Ft.)] = 0.8(Ac.Ft) Total soil loss = 2.20(In) Total soil loss = 0.715(Ac.Ft) Total rainfall = 4.64(In) Flood volume = 34556.0 Cubic Feet Total soil loss = 31132.0 Cubic Feet -------------------------------------------------------------------- Peak flow rate of this hydrograph = 1.465(CFS) -------------------------------------------------------------------- ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 24 - H O U R S T O R M R u n o f f H y d r o g r a p h -------------------------------------------------------------------- Hydrograph in 5 Minute intervals ((CFS)) -------------------------------------------------------------------- Time(h+m) Volume Ac.Ft Q(CFS) 0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 0+ 5 0.0000 0.00 Q | | | | 0+10 0.0003 0.03 Q | | | | 0+15 0.0006 0.05 Q | | | | 0+20 0.0011 0.06 Q | | | | 0+25 0.0016 0.08 Q | | | | 0+30 0.0023 0.10 Q | | | | 0+35 0.0030 0.10 Q | | | | 0+40 0.0037 0.11 Q | | | | 0+45 0.0045 0.11 Q | | | | 0+50 0.0053 0.11 Q | | | | 0+55 0.0061 0.13 Q | | | | 1+ 0 0.0071 0.14 Q | | | | 1+ 5 0.0081 0.14 Q | | | | 1+10 0.0090 0.13 Q | | | | 1+15 0.0098 0.12 Q | | | | 1+20 0.0106 0.12 Q | | | | 1+25 0.0114 0.12 Q | | | | 1+30 0.0122 0.12 Q | | | | 1+35 0.0130 0.12 Q | | | | 1+40 0.0138 0.11 Q | | | | 1+45 0.0146 0.11 Q | | | | 1+50 0.0154 0.12 Q | | | | 1+55 0.0163 0.13 Q | | | | 2+ 0 0.0173 0.14 Q | | | | 1035 2+ 5 0.0183 0.14 Q | | | | 2+10 0.0193 0.15 Q | | | | 2+15 0.0203 0.15 QV | | | | 2+20 0.0213 0.15 QV | | | | 2+25 0.0224 0.15 QV | | | | 2+30 0.0234 0.15 QV | | | | 2+35 0.0245 0.15 QV | | | | 2+40 0.0256 0.17 QV | | | | 2+45 0.0269 0.18 QV | | | | 2+50 0.0281 0.18 QV | | | | 2+55 0.0294 0.18 QV | | | | 3+ 0 0.0307 0.19 QV | | | | 3+ 5 0.0320 0.19 QV | | | | 3+10 0.0333 0.19 QV | | | | 3+15 0.0346 0.19 QV | | | | 3+20 0.0359 0.19 QV | | | | 3+25 0.0372 0.19 QV | | | | 3+30 0.0385 0.19 QV | | | | 3+35 0.0398 0.19 Q V | | | | 3+40 0.0411 0.19 Q V | | | | 3+45 0.0424 0.19 Q V | | | | 3+50 0.0437 0.19 Q V | | | | 3+55 0.0451 0.21 Q V | | | | 4+ 0 0.0466 0.22 Q V | | | | 4+ 5 0.0481 0.22 Q V | | | | 4+10 0.0497 0.22 Q V | | | | 4+15 0.0512 0.22 Q V | | | | 4+20 0.0528 0.23 Q V | | | | 4+25 0.0545 0.24 Q V | | | | 4+30 0.0562 0.25 |QV | | | | 4+35 0.0580 0.26 |QV | | | | 4+40 0.0598 0.26 |Q V | | | | 4+45 0.0616 0.26 |Q V | | | | 4+50 0.0634 0.27 |Q V | | | | 4+55 0.0653 0.28 |Q V | | | | 5+ 0 0.0674 0.29 |Q V | | | | 5+ 5 0.0694 0.29 |Q V | | | | 5+10 0.0712 0.26 |Q V | | | | 5+15 0.0729 0.25 Q V | | | | 5+20 0.0746 0.24 Q V | | | | 5+25 0.0763 0.25 |Q V | | | | 5+30 0.0781 0.26 |Q V | | | | 5+35 0.0799 0.26 |Q V | | | | 5+40 0.0818 0.28 |Q V | | | | 5+45 0.0838 0.29 |Q V | | | | 5+50 0.0859 0.30 |Q V | | | | 5+55 0.0879 0.30 |Q V | | | | 6+ 0 0.0900 0.30 |Q V | | | | 6+ 5 0.0921 0.30 |Q V | | | | 6+10 0.0943 0.32 |Q V | | | | 6+15 0.0965 0.33 |Q V | | | | 6+20 0.0988 0.33 |Q V | | | | 6+25 0.1011 0.34 |Q V | | | | 6+30 0.1035 0.34 |Q V | | | | 6+35 0.1058 0.34 |Q V | | | | 6+40 0.1083 0.36 |Q V | | | | 6+45 0.1108 0.37 |Q V | | | | 6+50 0.1134 0.37 |Q V | | | | 6+55 0.1159 0.37 |Q V | | | | 7+ 0 0.1185 0.38 |Q V | | | | 7+ 5 0.1211 0.38 |Q V | | | | 7+10 0.1237 0.38 |Q V | | | | 7+15 0.1263 0.38 |Q V | | | | 1036 7+20 0.1290 0.38 |Q V | | | | 7+25 0.1317 0.40 |Q V | | | | 7+30 0.1345 0.41 |Q V | | | | 7+35 0.1373 0.41 |Q V | | | | 7+40 0.1403 0.43 |Q V | | | | 7+45 0.1433 0.44 |Q V | | | | 7+50 0.1464 0.45 |Q V | | | | 7+55 0.1496 0.47 |Q V | | | | 8+ 0 0.1529 0.48 |Q V | | | | 8+ 5 0.1563 0.49 |Q V | | | | 8+10 0.1599 0.52 | Q V | | | | 8+15 0.1636 0.54 | Q V | | | | 8+20 0.1674 0.55 | Q V | | | | 8+25 0.1712 0.56 | Q V | | | | 8+30 0.1751 0.56 | Q V | | | | 8+35 0.1790 0.57 | Q V| | | | 8+40 0.1830 0.58 | Q V| | | | 8+45 0.1871 0.59 | Q V| | | | 8+50 0.1912 0.60 | Q V| | | | 8+55 0.1955 0.62 | Q V| | | | 9+ 0 0.1998 0.63 | Q V | | | 9+ 5 0.2042 0.64 | Q V | | | 9+10 0.2089 0.67 | Q V | | | 9+15 0.2137 0.69 | Q V | | | 9+20 0.2185 0.71 | Q |V | | | 9+25 0.2235 0.73 | Q |V | | | 9+30 0.2286 0.74 | Q |V | | | 9+35 0.2338 0.75 | Q |V | | | 9+40 0.2391 0.77 | Q | V | | | 9+45 0.2444 0.78 | Q | V | | | 9+50 0.2499 0.79 | Q | V | | | 9+55 0.2554 0.81 | Q | V | | | 10+ 0 0.2611 0.82 | Q | V | | | 10+ 5 0.2666 0.81 | Q | V | | | 10+10 0.2715 0.71 | Q | V | | | 10+15 0.2760 0.65 | Q | V | | | 10+20 0.2802 0.62 | Q | V | | | 10+25 0.2844 0.60 | Q | V | | | 10+30 0.2884 0.59 | Q | V | | | 10+35 0.2925 0.60 | Q | V | | | 10+40 0.2971 0.66 | Q | V | | | 10+45 0.3020 0.71 | Q | V | | | 10+50 0.3070 0.73 | Q | V | | | 10+55 0.3121 0.74 | Q | V | | | 11+ 0 0.3172 0.74 | Q | V | | | 11+ 5 0.3223 0.75 | Q | V | | | 11+10 0.3274 0.73 | Q | V | | | 11+15 0.3324 0.73 | Q | V | | | 11+20 0.3374 0.73 | Q | V | | | 11+25 0.3424 0.72 | Q | V | | | 11+30 0.3474 0.72 | Q | V | | | 11+35 0.3523 0.72 | Q | V | | | 11+40 0.3571 0.69 | Q | V | | | 11+45 0.3617 0.67 | Q | V | | | 11+50 0.3662 0.66 | Q | V | | | 11+55 0.3709 0.67 | Q | V | | | 12+ 0 0.3755 0.68 | Q | V | | | 12+ 5 0.3803 0.70 | Q | V| | | 12+10 0.3858 0.80 | Q | V| | | 12+15 0.3918 0.87 | Q | V| | | 12+20 0.3980 0.90 | Q | V | | 12+25 0.4044 0.93 | Q | V | | 12+30 0.4109 0.95 | Q | V | | 1037 12+35 0.4176 0.97 | Q | |V | | 12+40 0.4245 1.00 | Q | |V | | 12+45 0.4316 1.03 | Q | |V | | 12+50 0.4388 1.04 | Q | | V | | 12+55 0.4462 1.07 | Q | | V | | 13+ 0 0.4536 1.09 | Q | | V | | 13+ 5 0.4614 1.12 | Q | | V | | 13+10 0.4701 1.27 | Q | | V | | 13+15 0.4795 1.37 | Q | | V | | 13+20 0.4892 1.41 | Q | | V | | 13+25 0.4992 1.44 | Q | | V | | 13+30 0.5093 1.47 | Q | | V | | 13+35 0.5192 1.44 | Q | | V | | 13+40 0.5275 1.21 | Q | | V | | 13+45 0.5348 1.05 | Q | | V | | 13+50 0.5416 0.99 | Q | | V | | 13+55 0.5481 0.95 | Q | | V | | 14+ 0 0.5545 0.93 | Q | | V | | 14+ 5 0.5609 0.92 | Q | | V | | 14+10 0.5675 0.97 | Q | | V | | 14+15 0.5744 1.00 | Q | | V | | 14+20 0.5814 1.02 | Q | | V| | 14+25 0.5883 1.00 | Q | | V| | 14+30 0.5951 0.99 | Q | | V | 14+35 0.6019 0.99 | Q | | V | 14+40 0.6087 0.99 | Q | | V | 14+45 0.6156 0.99 | Q | | |V | 14+50 0.6224 0.99 | Q | | |V | 14+55 0.6291 0.97 | Q | | |V | 15+ 0 0.6357 0.96 | Q | | | V | 15+ 5 0.6423 0.96 | Q | | | V | 15+10 0.6488 0.94 | Q | | | V | 15+15 0.6552 0.93 | Q | | | V | 15+20 0.6615 0.92 | Q | | | V | 15+25 0.6677 0.90 | Q | | | V | 15+30 0.6738 0.89 | Q | | | V | 15+35 0.6798 0.87 | Q | | | V | 15+40 0.6854 0.81 | Q | | | V | 15+45 0.6907 0.77 | Q | | | V | 15+50 0.6959 0.75 | Q | | | V | 15+55 0.7010 0.74 | Q | | | V | 16+ 0 0.7061 0.74 | Q | | | V | 16+ 5 0.7109 0.70 | Q | | | V | 16+10 0.7142 0.48 |Q | | | V | 16+15 0.7164 0.33 |Q | | | V | 16+20 0.7183 0.26 |Q | | | V | 16+25 0.7198 0.23 Q | | | V | 16+30 0.7212 0.20 Q | | | V | 16+35 0.7225 0.18 Q | | | V | 16+40 0.7236 0.16 Q | | | V | 16+45 0.7245 0.14 Q | | | V | 16+50 0.7254 0.13 Q | | | V | 16+55 0.7263 0.12 Q | | | V | 17+ 0 0.7271 0.12 Q | | | V | 17+ 5 0.7279 0.12 Q | | | V | 17+10 0.7290 0.15 Q | | | V | 17+15 0.7301 0.17 Q | | | V | 17+20 0.7313 0.18 Q | | | V | 17+25 0.7326 0.18 Q | | | V | 17+30 0.7338 0.18 Q | | | V | 17+35 0.7351 0.19 Q | | | V | 17+40 0.7364 0.19 Q | | | V | 17+45 0.7377 0.19 Q | | | V | 1038 17+50 0.7390 0.19 Q | | | V | 17+55 0.7402 0.17 Q | | | V | 18+ 0 0.7413 0.16 Q | | | V | 18+ 5 0.7424 0.16 Q | | | V | 18+10 0.7435 0.16 Q | | | V | 18+15 0.7445 0.16 Q | | | V | 18+20 0.7456 0.15 Q | | | V | 18+25 0.7466 0.15 Q | | | V | 18+30 0.7477 0.15 Q | | | V | 18+35 0.7487 0.15 Q | | | V | 18+40 0.7497 0.14 Q | | | V | 18+45 0.7505 0.13 Q | | | V | 18+50 0.7513 0.12 Q | | | V | 18+55 0.7520 0.10 Q | | | V | 19+ 0 0.7527 0.09 Q | | | V | 19+ 5 0.7533 0.09 Q | | | V | 19+10 0.7540 0.10 Q | | | V | 19+15 0.7547 0.11 Q | | | V | 19+20 0.7555 0.11 Q | | | V | 19+25 0.7563 0.13 Q | | | V | 19+30 0.7573 0.14 Q | | | V | 19+35 0.7583 0.14 Q | | | V | 19+40 0.7591 0.13 Q | | | V | 19+45 0.7600 0.12 Q | | | V | 19+50 0.7608 0.12 Q | | | V | 19+55 0.7615 0.10 Q | | | V | 20+ 0 0.7621 0.09 Q | | | V | 20+ 5 0.7627 0.09 Q | | | V | 20+10 0.7634 0.10 Q | | | V | 20+15 0.7641 0.11 Q | | | V | 20+20 0.7648 0.11 Q | | | V | 20+25 0.7656 0.11 Q | | | V | 20+30 0.7664 0.11 Q | | | V | 20+35 0.7672 0.11 Q | | | V | 20+40 0.7679 0.11 Q | | | V | 20+45 0.7687 0.11 Q | | | V | 20+50 0.7695 0.11 Q | | | V | 20+55 0.7701 0.10 Q | | | V | 21+ 0 0.7707 0.09 Q | | | V | 21+ 5 0.7713 0.09 Q | | | V | 21+10 0.7720 0.10 Q | | | V | 21+15 0.7727 0.11 Q | | | V | 21+20 0.7735 0.11 Q | | | V | 21+25 0.7741 0.09 Q | | | V| 21+30 0.7747 0.09 Q | | | V| 21+35 0.7753 0.08 Q | | | V| 21+40 0.7759 0.10 Q | | | V| 21+45 0.7767 0.10 Q | | | V| 21+50 0.7774 0.11 Q | | | V| 21+55 0.7780 0.09 Q | | | V| 22+ 0 0.7786 0.08 Q | | | V| 22+ 5 0.7792 0.08 Q | | | V| 22+10 0.7799 0.10 Q | | | V| 22+15 0.7806 0.10 Q | | | V| 22+20 0.7813 0.11 Q | | | V| 22+25 0.7820 0.09 Q | | | V| 22+30 0.7825 0.08 Q | | | V| 22+35 0.7831 0.08 Q | | | V| 22+40 0.7836 0.08 Q | | | V| 22+45 0.7842 0.08 Q | | | V| 22+50 0.7847 0.08 Q | | | V| 22+55 0.7853 0.08 Q | | | V| 23+ 0 0.7858 0.08 Q | | | V| 1039 23+ 5 0.7863 0.08 Q | | | V| 23+10 0.7868 0.08 Q | | | V| 23+15 0.7874 0.08 Q | | | V| 23+20 0.7879 0.08 Q | | | V| 23+25 0.7884 0.08 Q | | | V| 23+30 0.7889 0.08 Q | | | V| 23+35 0.7894 0.08 Q | | | V| 23+40 0.7900 0.08 Q | | | V| 23+45 0.7905 0.08 Q | | | V| 23+50 0.7910 0.08 Q | | | V| 23+55 0.7915 0.08 Q | | | V| 24+ 0 0.7921 0.08 Q | | | V| 24+ 5 0.7926 0.07 Q | | | V| 24+10 0.7928 0.04 Q | | | V| 24+15 0.7930 0.02 Q | | | V| 24+20 0.7931 0.01 Q | | | V| 24+25 0.7932 0.01 Q | | | V| 24+30 0.7932 0.01 Q | | | V| 24+35 0.7932 0.00 Q | | | V| 24+40 0.7933 0.00 Q | | | V| 24+45 0.7933 0.00 Q | | | V| 24+50 0.7933 0.00 Q | | | V| 24+55 0.7933 0.00 Q | | | V| 25+ 0 0.7933 0.00 Q | | | V ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 1040 APPENDIX B PROPOSED CONDITION HYDROLOGY MAP 1041 CORPORATIONWILSON MIKAMI1042 APPENDIX C PROPOSED CONDITION RATIONAL METHOD CALCULATIONS 1043 10-YEAR HYDROLOGY 1044 ____________________________________________________________________________ **************************************************************************** RATIONAL METHOD HYDROLOGY COMPUTER PROGRAM BASED ON RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL & WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT (RCFC&WCD) 1978 HYDROLOGY MANUAL (c) Copyright 1982-2016 Advanced Engineering Software (aes) (Rational Tabling Version 23.0) Release Date: 07/01/2016 License ID 1557 Analysis prepared by: Wilson Mikami, Inc 9 CORPORATE PARK, SUITE 100 IRVINE, CA 92606 (949) 679-0090 ************************** DESCRIPTION OF STUDY ************************** * SHADOW RIDGE DEVELOPMENT PALM DESERT * * 10-YEAR POST DEVELOPMENT * * BY KAM 100523 * ************************************************************************** FILE NAME: SHAD.DAT TIME/DATE OF STUDY: 09:05 10/25/2023 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- USER SPECIFIED HYDROLOGY AND HYDRAULIC MODEL INFORMATION: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- USER SPECIFIED STORM EVENT(YEAR) = 10.00 SPECIFIED MINIMUM PIPE SIZE(INCH) = 18.00 SPECIFIED PERCENT OF GRADIENTS(DECIMAL) TO USE FOR FRICTION SLOPE = 0.95 10-YEAR STORM 10-MINUTE INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = 1.640 10-YEAR STORM 60-MINUTE INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = 0.746 100-YEAR STORM 10-MINUTE INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = 3.550 100-YEAR STORM 60-MINUTE INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = 1.610 SLOPE OF 10-YEAR INTENSITY-DURATION CURVE = 0.4396381 SLOPE OF 100-YEAR INTENSITY-DURATION CURVE = 0.4413055 COMPUTED RAINFALL INTENSITY DATA: STORM EVENT = 10.00 1-HOUR INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = 0.753 SLOPE OF INTENSITY DURATION CURVE = 0.4396 RCFC&WCD HYDROLOGY MANUAL "C"-VALUES USED FOR RATIONAL METHOD NOTE: COMPUTE CONFLUENCE VALUES ACCORDING TO RCFC&WCD HYDROLOGY MANUAL AND IGNORE OTHER CONFLUENCE COMBINATIONS FOR DOWNSTREAM ANALYSES *USER-DEFINED STREET-SECTIONS FOR COUPLED PIPEFLOW AND STREETFLOW MODEL* HALF- CROWN TO STREET-CROSSFALL: CURB GUTTER-GEOMETRIES: MANNING WIDTH CROSSFALL IN- / OUT-/PARK- HEIGHT WIDTH LIP HIKE FACTOR NO. (FT) (FT) SIDE / SIDE/ WAY (FT) (FT) (FT) (FT) (n) === ===== ========= ================= ====== ===== ====== ===== ======= 1 30.0 20.0 0.018/0.018/0.020 0.67 2.00 0.0313 0.167 0.0150 GLOBAL STREET FLOW-DEPTH CONSTRAINTS: 1. Relative Flow-Depth = 0.00 FEET as (Maximum Allowable Street Flow Depth) - (Top-of-Curb) 2. (Depth)*(Velocity) Constraint = 6.0 (FT*FT/S) *SIZE PIPE WITH A FLOW CAPACITY GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO THE UPSTREAM TRIBUTARY PIPE.* **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 10.00 TO NODE 11.00 IS CODE = 21 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< ============================================================================ ASSUMED INITIAL SUBAREA UNIFORM DEVELOPMENT IS SINGLE FAMILY (1/4 ACRE) 1045 TC = K*[(LENGTH**3)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**.2 INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = 200.00 UPSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = 306.10 DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = 304.50 ELEVATION DIFFERENCE(FEET) = 1.60 TC = 0.393*[( 200.00**3)/( 1.60)]**.2 = 8.585 10 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = 1.771 SINGLE-FAMILY(1/4 ACRE LOT) RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .6231 SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "A" SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 1.23 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 1.11 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) = 1.23 **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 11.00 TO NODE 12.00 IS CODE = 61 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>COMPUTE STREET FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<< >>>>>(STANDARD CURB SECTION USED)<<<<< ============================================================================ UPSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = 304.50 DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = 302.60 STREET LENGTH(FEET) = 291.00 CURB HEIGHT(INCHES) = 6.0 STREET HALFWIDTH(FEET) = 16.00 DISTANCE FROM CROWN TO CROSSFALL GRADEBREAK(FEET) = 11.00 INSIDE STREET CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) = 0.020 OUTSIDE STREET CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) = 0.020 SPECIFIED NUMBER OF HALFSTREETS CARRYING RUNOFF = 1 Manning's FRICTION FACTOR for Streetflow Section(curb-to-curb) = 0.0150 **TRAVEL TIME COMPUTED USING ESTIMATED FLOW(CFS) = 1.86 STREETFLOW MODEL RESULTS USING ESTIMATED FLOW: STREET FLOW DEPTH(FEET) = 0.32 HALFSTREET FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) = 9.63 AVERAGE FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 1.78 PRODUCT OF DEPTH&VELOCITY(FT*FT/SEC.) = 0.57 STREET FLOW TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 2.73 Tc(MIN.) = 11.31 10 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = 1.569 CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .6973 SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "A" SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 1.16 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 1.27 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 2.3 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 2.49 END OF SUBAREA STREET FLOW HYDRAULICS: DEPTH(FEET) = 0.34 HALFSTREET FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) = 10.93 FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 1.90 DEPTH*VELOCITY(FT*FT/SEC.) = 0.66 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 10.00 TO NODE 12.00 = 491.00 FEET. **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 12.00 TO NODE 13.00 IS CODE = 31 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>COMPUTE PIPE-FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<< >>>>>USING COMPUTER-ESTIMATED PIPESIZE (NON-PRESSURE FLOW)<<<<< ============================================================================ ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 297.10 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 296.90 FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = 21.00 MANNING'S N = 0.012 ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) INCREASED TO 18.000 DEPTH OF FLOW IN 18.0 INCH PIPE IS 5.9 INCHES PIPE-FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 4.98 ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = 18.00 NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE-FLOW(CFS) = 2.49 PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 0.07 Tc(MIN.) = 11.38 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 10.00 TO NODE 13.00 = 512.00 FEET. 1046 **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 13.00 TO NODE 13.00 IS CODE = 81 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>ADDITION OF SUBAREA TO MAINLINE PEAK FLOW<<<<< ============================================================================ 10 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = 1.565 SINGLE-FAMILY(1/4 ACRE LOT) RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .6101 SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "A" SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 1.19 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 1.14 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 3.5 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) = 3.63 TC(MIN.) = 11.38 **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 13.00 TO NODE 14.00 IS CODE = 31 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>COMPUTE PIPE-FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<< >>>>>USING COMPUTER-ESTIMATED PIPESIZE (NON-PRESSURE FLOW)<<<<< ============================================================================ ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 296.90 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 295.60 FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = 54.00 MANNING'S N = 0.012 ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) INCREASED TO 18.000 DEPTH OF FLOW IN 18.0 INCH PIPE IS 5.6 INCHES PIPE-FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 7.71 ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = 18.00 NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE-FLOW(CFS) = 3.63 PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 0.12 Tc(MIN.) = 11.50 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 10.00 TO NODE 14.00 = 566.00 FEET. **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 14.00 TO NODE 14.00 IS CODE = 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE<<<<< ============================================================================ TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 1 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = 11.50 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 1.56 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 3.46 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE = 3.63 **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 15.00 TO NODE 16.00 IS CODE = 21 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< ============================================================================ ASSUMED INITIAL SUBAREA UNIFORM DEVELOPMENT IS SINGLE FAMILY (1/4 ACRE) TC = K*[(LENGTH**3)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**.2 INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = 711.00 UPSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = 311.00 DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = 305.00 ELEVATION DIFFERENCE(FEET) = 6.00 TC = 0.393*[( 711.00**3)/( 6.00)]**.2 = 14.107 10 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = 1.424 SINGLE-FAMILY(1/4 ACRE LOT) RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .6005 SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "A" SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 2.03 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 2.38 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) = 2.03 **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 16.00 TO NODE 17.00 IS CODE = 31 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>COMPUTE PIPE-FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<< 1047 >>>>>USING COMPUTER-ESTIMATED PIPESIZE (NON-PRESSURE FLOW)<<<<< ============================================================================ ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 298.50 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 298.30 FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = 35.00 MANNING'S N = 0.013 ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) INCREASED TO 18.000 DEPTH OF FLOW IN 18.0 INCH PIPE IS 6.3 INCHES PIPE-FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 3.69 ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = 18.00 NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE-FLOW(CFS) = 2.03 PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 0.16 Tc(MIN.) = 14.27 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 15.00 TO NODE 17.00 = 746.00 FEET. **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 17.00 TO NODE 17.00 IS CODE = 81 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>ADDITION OF SUBAREA TO MAINLINE PEAK FLOW<<<<< ============================================================================ 10 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = 1.417 SINGLE-FAMILY(1/4 ACRE LOT) RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .6000 SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "A" SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 2.64 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 2.24 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 5.0 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) = 4.28 TC(MIN.) = 14.27 **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 17.00 TO NODE 18.00 IS CODE = 31 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>COMPUTE PIPE-FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<< >>>>>USING COMPUTER-ESTIMATED PIPESIZE (NON-PRESSURE FLOW)<<<<< ============================================================================ ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 298.30 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 296.30 FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = 400.00 MANNING'S N = 0.013 ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) INCREASED TO 18.000 DEPTH OF FLOW IN 18.0 INCH PIPE IS 10.0 INCHES PIPE-FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 4.27 ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = 18.00 NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE-FLOW(CFS) = 4.28 PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 1.56 Tc(MIN.) = 15.83 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 15.00 TO NODE 18.00 = 1146.00 FEET. **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 18.00 TO NODE 18.00 IS CODE = 81 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>ADDITION OF SUBAREA TO MAINLINE PEAK FLOW<<<<< ============================================================================ 10 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = 1.354 SINGLE-FAMILY(1/4 ACRE LOT) RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .5955 SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "A" SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 1.87 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 1.51 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 6.9 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) = 5.79 TC(MIN.) = 15.83 **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 18.00 TO NODE 18.00 IS CODE = 81 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>ADDITION OF SUBAREA TO MAINLINE PEAK FLOW<<<<< ============================================================================ 10 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = 1.354 SINGLE-FAMILY(1/4 ACRE LOT) RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .5955 SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "A" SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 1.54 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 1.24 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 8.4 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) = 7.03 TC(MIN.) = 15.83 1048 **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 18.00 TO NODE 14.00 IS CODE = 31 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>COMPUTE PIPE-FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<< >>>>>USING COMPUTER-ESTIMATED PIPESIZE (NON-PRESSURE FLOW)<<<<< ============================================================================ ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 296.30 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 295.60 FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = 42.00 MANNING'S N = 0.013 ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) INCREASED TO 18.000 DEPTH OF FLOW IN 18.0 INCH PIPE IS 9.3 INCHES PIPE-FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 7.60 ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = 18.00 NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE-FLOW(CFS) = 7.03 PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 0.09 Tc(MIN.) = 15.92 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 15.00 TO NODE 14.00 = 1188.00 FEET. **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 14.00 TO NODE 14.00 IS CODE = 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE<<<<< >>>>>AND COMPUTE VARIOUS CONFLUENCED STREAM VALUES<<<<< ============================================================================ TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 2 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = 15.92 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 1.35 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 8.43 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE = 7.03 ** CONFLUENCE DATA ** STREAM RUNOFF Tc INTENSITY AREA NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HOUR) (ACRE) 1 3.63 11.50 1.558 3.46 2 7.03 15.92 1.350 8.43 *********************************WARNING********************************** IN THIS COMPUTER PROGRAM, THE CONFLUENCE VALUE USED IS BASED ON THE RCFC&WCD FORMULA OF PLATE D-1 AS DEFAULT VALUE. THIS FORMULA WILL NOT NECESSARILY RESULT IN THE MAXIMUM VALUE OF PEAK FLOW. ************************************************************************** RAINFALL INTENSITY AND TIME OF CONCENTRATION RATIO CONFLUENCE FORMULA USED FOR 2 STREAMS. ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE ** STREAM RUNOFF Tc INTENSITY NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HOUR) 1 8.71 11.50 1.558 2 10.17 15.92 1.350 COMPUTED CONFLUENCE ESTIMATES ARE AS FOLLOWS: PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 10.17 Tc(MIN.) = 15.92 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 11.9 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 15.00 TO NODE 14.00 = 1188.00 FEET. **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 14.00 TO NODE 14.00 IS CODE = 81 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>ADDITION OF SUBAREA TO MAINLINE PEAK FLOW<<<<< ============================================================================ 10 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = 1.350 COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .8390 1049 SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "A" SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 0.35 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.40 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 12.2 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) = 10.57 TC(MIN.) = 15.92 **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 14.00 TO NODE 14.00 IS CODE = 81 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>ADDITION OF SUBAREA TO MAINLINE PEAK FLOW<<<<< ============================================================================ 10 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = 1.350 CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .6867 SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "A" SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 0.43 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.40 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 12.7 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) = 10.97 TC(MIN.) = 15.92 **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 14.00 TO NODE 19.00 IS CODE = 31 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>COMPUTE PIPE-FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<< >>>>>USING COMPUTER-ESTIMATED PIPESIZE (NON-PRESSURE FLOW)<<<<< ============================================================================ ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 295.60 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 295.00 FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = 119.00 MANNING'S N = 0.012 DEPTH OF FLOW IN 21.0 INCH PIPE IS 15.9 INCHES PIPE-FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 5.60 ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = 21.00 NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE-FLOW(CFS) = 10.97 PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 0.35 Tc(MIN.) = 16.27 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 15.00 TO NODE 19.00 = 1307.00 FEET. **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 19.00 TO NODE 19.00 IS CODE = 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE<<<<< ============================================================================ TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 1 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = 16.27 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 1.34 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 12.67 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE = 10.97 **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 10.00 TO NODE 30.00 IS CODE = 21 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< ============================================================================ ASSUMED INITIAL SUBAREA UNIFORM DEVELOPMENT IS CONDOMINIUM TC = K*[(LENGTH**3)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**.2 INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = 278.00 UPSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = 306.10 DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = 304.20 ELEVATION DIFFERENCE(FEET) = 1.90 TC = 0.359*[( 278.00**3)/( 1.90)]**.2 = 9.247 10 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = 1.714 CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .7037 SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "A" SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.64 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.53 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.64 1050 **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 30.00 TO NODE 31.00 IS CODE = 61 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>COMPUTE STREET FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<< >>>>>(STANDARD CURB SECTION USED)<<<<< ============================================================================ UPSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = 304.20 DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = 301.90 STREET LENGTH(FEET) = 227.00 CURB HEIGHT(INCHES) = 6.0 STREET HALFWIDTH(FEET) = 16.00 DISTANCE FROM CROWN TO CROSSFALL GRADEBREAK(FEET) = 11.00 INSIDE STREET CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) = 0.020 OUTSIDE STREET CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) = 0.020 SPECIFIED NUMBER OF HALFSTREETS CARRYING RUNOFF = 1 Manning's FRICTION FACTOR for Streetflow Section(curb-to-curb) = 0.0150 **TRAVEL TIME COMPUTED USING ESTIMATED FLOW(CFS) = 0.98 STREETFLOW MODEL RESULTS USING ESTIMATED FLOW: STREET FLOW DEPTH(FEET) = 0.26 HALFSTREET FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) = 6.46 AVERAGE FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 1.84 PRODUCT OF DEPTH&VELOCITY(FT*FT/SEC.) = 0.47 STREET FLOW TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 2.06 Tc(MIN.) = 11.30 10 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = 1.570 CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .6973 SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "A" SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 0.63 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.69 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 1.2 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 1.33 END OF SUBAREA STREET FLOW HYDRAULICS: DEPTH(FEET) = 0.28 HALFSTREET FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) = 7.48 FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 1.96 DEPTH*VELOCITY(FT*FT/SEC.) = 0.54 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 10.00 TO NODE 31.00 = 505.00 FEET. **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 31.00 TO NODE 19.00 IS CODE = 31 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>COMPUTE PIPE-FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<< >>>>>USING COMPUTER-ESTIMATED PIPESIZE (NON-PRESSURE FLOW)<<<<< ============================================================================ ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 296.80 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 295.00 FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = 23.00 MANNING'S N = 0.012 ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) INCREASED TO 18.000 DEPTH OF FLOW IN 18.0 INCH PIPE IS 2.5 INCHES PIPE-FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 8.76 ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = 18.00 NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE-FLOW(CFS) = 1.33 PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 0.04 Tc(MIN.) = 11.35 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 10.00 TO NODE 19.00 = 528.00 FEET. **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 19.00 TO NODE 19.00 IS CODE = 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE<<<<< >>>>>AND COMPUTE VARIOUS CONFLUENCED STREAM VALUES<<<<< ============================================================================ TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 2 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = 11.35 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 1.57 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 1.16 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE = 1.33 1051 ** CONFLUENCE DATA ** STREAM RUNOFF Tc INTENSITY AREA NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HOUR) (ACRE) 1 10.97 16.27 1.337 12.67 2 1.33 11.35 1.567 1.16 *********************************WARNING********************************** IN THIS COMPUTER PROGRAM, THE CONFLUENCE VALUE USED IS BASED ON THE RCFC&WCD FORMULA OF PLATE D-1 AS DEFAULT VALUE. THIS FORMULA WILL NOT NECESSARILY RESULT IN THE MAXIMUM VALUE OF PEAK FLOW. ************************************************************************** RAINFALL INTENSITY AND TIME OF CONCENTRATION RATIO CONFLUENCE FORMULA USED FOR 2 STREAMS. ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE ** STREAM RUNOFF Tc INTENSITY NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HOUR) 1 8.98 11.35 1.567 2 12.10 16.27 1.337 COMPUTED CONFLUENCE ESTIMATES ARE AS FOLLOWS: PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 12.10 Tc(MIN.) = 16.27 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 13.8 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 15.00 TO NODE 19.00 = 1307.00 FEET. **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 19.00 TO NODE 19.00 IS CODE = 81 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>ADDITION OF SUBAREA TO MAINLINE PEAK FLOW<<<<< ============================================================================ 10 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = 1.337 COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .8389 SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "A" SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 0.09 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.10 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 13.9 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) = 12.20 TC(MIN.) = 16.27 **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 19.00 TO NODE 19.00 IS CODE = 81 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>ADDITION OF SUBAREA TO MAINLINE PEAK FLOW<<<<< ============================================================================ 10 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = 1.337 SINGLE-FAMILY(1-ACRE LOT) RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .4109 SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "A" SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 0.54 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.30 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 14.5 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) = 12.50 TC(MIN.) = 16.27 **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 19.00 TO NODE 20.00 IS CODE = 31 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>COMPUTE PIPE-FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<< >>>>>USING COMPUTER-ESTIMATED PIPESIZE (NON-PRESSURE FLOW)<<<<< ============================================================================ ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 295.00 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 294.70 FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = 60.00 MANNING'S N = 0.012 DEPTH OF FLOW IN 24.0 INCH PIPE IS 15.4 INCHES PIPE-FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 5.88 ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = 24.00 NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE-FLOW(CFS) = 12.50 1052 PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 0.17 Tc(MIN.) = 16.44 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 15.00 TO NODE 20.00 = 1367.00 FEET. **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 20.00 TO NODE 20.00 IS CODE = 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE<<<<< ============================================================================ TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 1 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = 16.44 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 1.33 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 14.46 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE = 12.50 **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 10.00 TO NODE 35.00 IS CODE = 21 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< ============================================================================ ASSUMED INITIAL SUBAREA UNIFORM DEVELOPMENT IS SINGLE FAMILY (1/4 ACRE) TC = K*[(LENGTH**3)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**.2 INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = 327.00 UPSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = 306.10 DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = 304.20 ELEVATION DIFFERENCE(FEET) = 1.90 TC = 0.393*[( 327.00**3)/( 1.90)]**.2 = 11.141 10 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = 1.580 SINGLE-FAMILY(1/4 ACRE LOT) RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .6111 SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "A" SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 1.42 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 1.47 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) = 1.42 **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 35.00 TO NODE 36.00 IS CODE = 61 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>COMPUTE STREET FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<< >>>>>(STANDARD CURB SECTION USED)<<<<< ============================================================================ UPSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = 304.20 DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = 303.00 STREET LENGTH(FEET) = 228.00 CURB HEIGHT(INCHES) = 6.0 STREET HALFWIDTH(FEET) = 16.00 DISTANCE FROM CROWN TO CROSSFALL GRADEBREAK(FEET) = 11.00 INSIDE STREET CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) = 0.020 OUTSIDE STREET CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) = 0.020 SPECIFIED NUMBER OF HALFSTREETS CARRYING RUNOFF = 1 Manning's FRICTION FACTOR for Streetflow Section(curb-to-curb) = 0.0150 **TRAVEL TIME COMPUTED USING ESTIMATED FLOW(CFS) = 1.90 STREETFLOW MODEL RESULTS USING ESTIMATED FLOW: STREET FLOW DEPTH(FEET) = 0.33 HALFSTREET FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) = 10.19 AVERAGE FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 1.64 PRODUCT OF DEPTH&VELOCITY(FT*FT/SEC.) = 0.54 STREET FLOW TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 2.31 Tc(MIN.) = 13.45 10 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = 1.454 CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .6918 SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "A" SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 0.96 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.97 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 2.4 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 2.38 1053 END OF SUBAREA STREET FLOW HYDRAULICS: DEPTH(FEET) = 0.35 HALFSTREET FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) = 11.21 FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 1.73 DEPTH*VELOCITY(FT*FT/SEC.) = 0.61 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 10.00 TO NODE 36.00 = 555.00 FEET. **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 36.00 TO NODE 37.00 IS CODE = 31 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>COMPUTE PIPE-FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<< >>>>>USING COMPUTER-ESTIMATED PIPESIZE (NON-PRESSURE FLOW)<<<<< ============================================================================ ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 297.50 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 297.30 FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = 35.00 MANNING'S N = 0.012 ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) INCREASED TO 18.000 DEPTH OF FLOW IN 18.0 INCH PIPE IS 6.6 INCHES PIPE-FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 4.08 ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = 18.00 NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE-FLOW(CFS) = 2.38 PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 0.14 Tc(MIN.) = 13.60 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 10.00 TO NODE 37.00 = 590.00 FEET. **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 37.00 TO NODE 37.00 IS CODE = 81 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>ADDITION OF SUBAREA TO MAINLINE PEAK FLOW<<<<< ============================================================================ 10 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = 1.447 COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .8404 SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "A" SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 0.04 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.05 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 2.5 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) = 2.43 TC(MIN.) = 13.60 **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 37.00 TO NODE 20.00 IS CODE = 31 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>COMPUTE PIPE-FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<< >>>>>USING COMPUTER-ESTIMATED PIPESIZE (NON-PRESSURE FLOW)<<<<< ============================================================================ ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 297.30 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 294.70 FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = 14.00 MANNING'S N = 0.012 ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) INCREASED TO 18.000 DEPTH OF FLOW IN 18.0 INCH PIPE IS 2.8 INCHES PIPE-FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 14.17 ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = 18.00 NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE-FLOW(CFS) = 2.43 PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 0.02 Tc(MIN.) = 13.61 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 10.00 TO NODE 20.00 = 604.00 FEET. **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 20.00 TO NODE 20.00 IS CODE = 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE<<<<< >>>>>AND COMPUTE VARIOUS CONFLUENCED STREAM VALUES<<<<< ============================================================================ TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 2 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = 13.61 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 1.45 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 2.47 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE = 2.43 1054 ** CONFLUENCE DATA ** STREAM RUNOFF Tc INTENSITY AREA NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HOUR) (ACRE) 1 12.50 16.44 1.331 14.46 2 2.43 13.61 1.446 2.47 *********************************WARNING********************************** IN THIS COMPUTER PROGRAM, THE CONFLUENCE VALUE USED IS BASED ON THE RCFC&WCD FORMULA OF PLATE D-1 AS DEFAULT VALUE. THIS FORMULA WILL NOT NECESSARILY RESULT IN THE MAXIMUM VALUE OF PEAK FLOW. ************************************************************************** RAINFALL INTENSITY AND TIME OF CONCENTRATION RATIO CONFLUENCE FORMULA USED FOR 2 STREAMS. ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE ** STREAM RUNOFF Tc INTENSITY NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HOUR) 1 12.78 13.61 1.446 2 14.74 16.44 1.331 COMPUTED CONFLUENCE ESTIMATES ARE AS FOLLOWS: PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 14.74 Tc(MIN.) = 16.44 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 16.9 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 15.00 TO NODE 20.00 = 1367.00 FEET. **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 15.00 TO NODE 40.00 IS CODE = 21 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< ============================================================================ ASSUMED INITIAL SUBAREA UNIFORM DEVELOPMENT IS SINGLE FAMILY(1/2 ACRE) TC = K*[(LENGTH**3)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**.2 INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = 312.00 UPSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = 311.00 DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = 307.60 ELEVATION DIFFERENCE(FEET) = 3.40 TC = 0.422*[( 312.00**3)/( 3.40)]**.2 = 10.366 10 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = 1.630 SINGLE-FAMILY(1/2 ACRE LOT) RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .5572 SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "A" SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.71 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.78 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.71 **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 40.00 TO NODE 41.00 IS CODE = 61 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>COMPUTE STREET FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<< >>>>>(STANDARD CURB SECTION USED)<<<<< ============================================================================ UPSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = 307.60 DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = 304.50 STREET LENGTH(FEET) = 402.00 CURB HEIGHT(INCHES) = 6.0 STREET HALFWIDTH(FEET) = 16.00 DISTANCE FROM CROWN TO CROSSFALL GRADEBREAK(FEET) = 11.00 INSIDE STREET CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) = 0.020 OUTSIDE STREET CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) = 0.020 SPECIFIED NUMBER OF HALFSTREETS CARRYING RUNOFF = 1 Manning's FRICTION FACTOR for Streetflow Section(curb-to-curb) = 0.0150 **TRAVEL TIME COMPUTED USING ESTIMATED FLOW(CFS) = 1.64 1055 STREETFLOW MODEL RESULTS USING ESTIMATED FLOW: STREET FLOW DEPTH(FEET) = 0.30 HALFSTREET FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) = 8.78 AVERAGE FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 1.84 PRODUCT OF DEPTH&VELOCITY(FT*FT/SEC.) = 0.56 STREET FLOW TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 3.64 Tc(MIN.) = 14.00 10 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = 1.428 SINGLE-FAMILY(1/4 ACRE LOT) RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .6008 SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "A" SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 2.16 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 1.85 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 2.9 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 2.56 END OF SUBAREA STREET FLOW HYDRAULICS: DEPTH(FEET) = 0.34 HALFSTREET FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) = 10.65 FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 2.05 DEPTH*VELOCITY(FT*FT/SEC.) = 0.69 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 15.00 TO NODE 41.00 = 714.00 FEET. **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 41.00 TO NODE 41.00 IS CODE = 81 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>ADDITION OF SUBAREA TO MAINLINE PEAK FLOW<<<<< ============================================================================ 10 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = 1.428 CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .6906 SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "A" SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 0.91 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.90 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 3.9 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) = 3.46 TC(MIN.) = 14.00 ============================================================================ END OF STUDY SUMMARY: TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 3.9 TC(MIN.) = 14.00 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 3.46 ============================================================================ ============================================================================ END OF RATIONAL METHOD ANALYSIS 1056 100-YEAR HYDROLOGY 1057 ____________________________________________________________________________ **************************************************************************** RATIONAL METHOD HYDROLOGY COMPUTER PROGRAM BASED ON RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL & WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT (RCFC&WCD) 1978 HYDROLOGY MANUAL (c) Copyright 1982-2016 Advanced Engineering Software (aes) (Rational Tabling Version 23.0) Release Date: 07/01/2016 License ID 1557 Analysis prepared by: Wilson Mikami, Inc 9 CORPORATE PARK, SUITE 100 IRVINE, CA 92606 (949) 679-0090 ************************** DESCRIPTION OF STUDY ************************** * SHADOW RIDGE DEVELOPMENT PALM DESERT * * 100-YEAR POST DEVELOPMENT * * BY KAM 100523 * ************************************************************************** FILE NAME: SHAD.DAT TIME/DATE OF STUDY: 09:22 10/25/2023 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- USER SPECIFIED HYDROLOGY AND HYDRAULIC MODEL INFORMATION: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- USER SPECIFIED STORM EVENT(YEAR) = 100.00 SPECIFIED MINIMUM PIPE SIZE(INCH) = 18.00 SPECIFIED PERCENT OF GRADIENTS(DECIMAL) TO USE FOR FRICTION SLOPE = 0.95 10-YEAR STORM 10-MINUTE INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = 1.640 10-YEAR STORM 60-MINUTE INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = 0.746 100-YEAR STORM 10-MINUTE INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = 3.550 100-YEAR STORM 60-MINUTE INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = 1.610 SLOPE OF 10-YEAR INTENSITY-DURATION CURVE = 0.4396381 SLOPE OF 100-YEAR INTENSITY-DURATION CURVE = 0.4413055 COMPUTED RAINFALL INTENSITY DATA: STORM EVENT = 100.00 1-HOUR INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = 1.610 SLOPE OF INTENSITY DURATION CURVE = 0.4413 RCFC&WCD HYDROLOGY MANUAL "C"-VALUES USED FOR RATIONAL METHOD NOTE: COMPUTE CONFLUENCE VALUES ACCORDING TO RCFC&WCD HYDROLOGY MANUAL AND IGNORE OTHER CONFLUENCE COMBINATIONS FOR DOWNSTREAM ANALYSES *USER-DEFINED STREET-SECTIONS FOR COUPLED PIPEFLOW AND STREETFLOW MODEL* HALF- CROWN TO STREET-CROSSFALL: CURB GUTTER-GEOMETRIES: MANNING WIDTH CROSSFALL IN- / OUT-/PARK- HEIGHT WIDTH LIP HIKE FACTOR NO. (FT) (FT) SIDE / SIDE/ WAY (FT) (FT) (FT) (FT) (n) === ===== ========= ================= ====== ===== ====== ===== ======= 1 30.0 20.0 0.018/0.018/0.020 0.67 2.00 0.0313 0.167 0.0150 GLOBAL STREET FLOW-DEPTH CONSTRAINTS: 1. Relative Flow-Depth = 0.00 FEET as (Maximum Allowable Street Flow Depth) - (Top-of-Curb) 2. (Depth)*(Velocity) Constraint = 6.0 (FT*FT/S) *SIZE PIPE WITH A FLOW CAPACITY GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO THE UPSTREAM TRIBUTARY PIPE.* **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 10.00 TO NODE 11.00 IS CODE = 21 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< ============================================================================ ASSUMED INITIAL SUBAREA UNIFORM DEVELOPMENT IS SINGLE FAMILY (1/4 ACRE) 1058 TC = K*[(LENGTH**3)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**.2 INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = 200.00 UPSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = 306.10 DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = 304.50 ELEVATION DIFFERENCE(FEET) = 1.60 TC = 0.393*[( 200.00**3)/( 1.60)]**.2 = 8.585 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = 3.797 SINGLE-FAMILY(1/4 ACRE LOT) RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .7077 SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "A" SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 2.98 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 1.11 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) = 2.98 **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 11.00 TO NODE 12.00 IS CODE = 61 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>COMPUTE STREET FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<< >>>>>(STANDARD CURB SECTION USED)<<<<< ============================================================================ UPSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = 304.50 DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = 302.60 STREET LENGTH(FEET) = 291.00 CURB HEIGHT(INCHES) = 6.0 STREET HALFWIDTH(FEET) = 16.00 DISTANCE FROM CROWN TO CROSSFALL GRADEBREAK(FEET) = 11.00 INSIDE STREET CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) = 0.020 OUTSIDE STREET CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) = 0.020 SPECIFIED NUMBER OF HALFSTREETS CARRYING RUNOFF = 1 Manning's FRICTION FACTOR for Streetflow Section(curb-to-curb) = 0.0150 **TRAVEL TIME COMPUTED USING ESTIMATED FLOW(CFS) = 4.49 STREETFLOW MODEL RESULTS USING ESTIMATED FLOW: STREET FLOW DEPTH(FEET) = 0.40 HALFSTREET FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) = 13.93 AVERAGE FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 2.18 PRODUCT OF DEPTH&VELOCITY(FT*FT/SEC.) = 0.88 STREET FLOW TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 2.22 Tc(MIN.) = 10.81 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = 3.430 CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .7575 SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "A" SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 1.16 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 3.01 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 2.3 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 6.00 END OF SUBAREA STREET FLOW HYDRAULICS: DEPTH(FEET) = 0.44 HALFSTREET FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) = 15.63 FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 2.34 DEPTH*VELOCITY(FT*FT/SEC.) = 1.03 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 10.00 TO NODE 12.00 = 491.00 FEET. **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 12.00 TO NODE 13.00 IS CODE = 31 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>COMPUTE PIPE-FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<< >>>>>USING COMPUTER-ESTIMATED PIPESIZE (NON-PRESSURE FLOW)<<<<< ============================================================================ ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 297.10 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 296.90 FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = 21.00 MANNING'S N = 0.012 ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) INCREASED TO 18.000 DEPTH OF FLOW IN 18.0 INCH PIPE IS 9.6 INCHES PIPE-FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 6.28 ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = 18.00 NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE-FLOW(CFS) = 6.00 PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 0.06 Tc(MIN.) = 10.86 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 10.00 TO NODE 13.00 = 512.00 FEET. 1059 **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 13.00 TO NODE 13.00 IS CODE = 81 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>ADDITION OF SUBAREA TO MAINLINE PEAK FLOW<<<<< ============================================================================ 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = 3.422 SINGLE-FAMILY(1/4 ACRE LOT) RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .6962 SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "A" SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 1.19 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 2.84 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 3.5 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) = 8.83 TC(MIN.) = 10.86 **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 13.00 TO NODE 14.00 IS CODE = 31 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>COMPUTE PIPE-FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<< >>>>>USING COMPUTER-ESTIMATED PIPESIZE (NON-PRESSURE FLOW)<<<<< ============================================================================ ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 296.90 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 295.60 FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = 54.00 MANNING'S N = 0.012 ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) INCREASED TO 18.000 DEPTH OF FLOW IN 18.0 INCH PIPE IS 9.1 INCHES PIPE-FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 9.80 ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = 18.00 NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE-FLOW(CFS) = 8.83 PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 0.09 Tc(MIN.) = 10.96 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 10.00 TO NODE 14.00 = 566.00 FEET. **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 14.00 TO NODE 14.00 IS CODE = 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE<<<<< ============================================================================ TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 1 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = 10.96 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 3.41 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 3.46 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE = 8.83 **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 15.00 TO NODE 16.00 IS CODE = 21 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< ============================================================================ ASSUMED INITIAL SUBAREA UNIFORM DEVELOPMENT IS SINGLE FAMILY (1/4 ACRE) TC = K*[(LENGTH**3)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**.2 INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = 711.00 UPSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = 311.00 DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = 305.00 ELEVATION DIFFERENCE(FEET) = 6.00 TC = 0.393*[( 711.00**3)/( 6.00)]**.2 = 14.107 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = 3.050 SINGLE-FAMILY(1/4 ACRE LOT) RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .6833 SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "A" SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 4.96 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 2.38 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) = 4.96 **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 16.00 TO NODE 17.00 IS CODE = 31 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>COMPUTE PIPE-FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<< 1060 >>>>>USING COMPUTER-ESTIMATED PIPESIZE (NON-PRESSURE FLOW)<<<<< ============================================================================ ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 298.50 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 298.30 FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = 35.00 MANNING'S N = 0.013 DEPTH OF FLOW IN 18.0 INCH PIPE IS 10.5 INCHES PIPE-FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 4.65 ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = 18.00 NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE-FLOW(CFS) = 4.96 PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 0.13 Tc(MIN.) = 14.23 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 15.00 TO NODE 17.00 = 746.00 FEET. **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 17.00 TO NODE 17.00 IS CODE = 81 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>ADDITION OF SUBAREA TO MAINLINE PEAK FLOW<<<<< ============================================================================ 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = 3.038 SINGLE-FAMILY(1/4 ACRE LOT) RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .6828 SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "A" SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 2.64 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 5.48 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 5.0 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) = 10.44 TC(MIN.) = 14.23 **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 17.00 TO NODE 18.00 IS CODE = 31 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>COMPUTE PIPE-FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<< >>>>>USING COMPUTER-ESTIMATED PIPESIZE (NON-PRESSURE FLOW)<<<<< ============================================================================ ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 298.30 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 296.30 FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = 400.00 MANNING'S N = 0.013 DEPTH OF FLOW IN 21.0 INCH PIPE IS 16.4 INCHES PIPE-FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 5.17 ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = 21.00 NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE-FLOW(CFS) = 10.44 PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 1.29 Tc(MIN.) = 15.52 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 15.00 TO NODE 18.00 = 1146.00 FEET. **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 18.00 TO NODE 18.00 IS CODE = 81 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>ADDITION OF SUBAREA TO MAINLINE PEAK FLOW<<<<< ============================================================================ 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = 2.924 SINGLE-FAMILY(1/4 ACRE LOT) RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .6785 SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "A" SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 1.87 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 3.71 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 6.9 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) = 14.15 TC(MIN.) = 15.52 **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 18.00 TO NODE 18.00 IS CODE = 81 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>ADDITION OF SUBAREA TO MAINLINE PEAK FLOW<<<<< ============================================================================ 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = 2.924 SINGLE-FAMILY(1/4 ACRE LOT) RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .6785 SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "A" SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 1.54 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 3.06 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 8.4 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) = 17.20 TC(MIN.) = 15.52 **************************************************************************** 1061 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 18.00 TO NODE 14.00 IS CODE = 31 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>COMPUTE PIPE-FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<< >>>>>USING COMPUTER-ESTIMATED PIPESIZE (NON-PRESSURE FLOW)<<<<< ============================================================================ ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 296.30 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 295.60 FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = 42.00 MANNING'S N = 0.013 DEPTH OF FLOW IN 21.0 INCH PIPE IS 15.0 INCHES PIPE-FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 9.32 ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = 21.00 NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE-FLOW(CFS) = 17.20 PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 0.08 Tc(MIN.) = 15.60 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 15.00 TO NODE 14.00 = 1188.00 FEET. **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 14.00 TO NODE 14.00 IS CODE = 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE<<<<< >>>>>AND COMPUTE VARIOUS CONFLUENCED STREAM VALUES<<<<< ============================================================================ TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 2 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = 15.60 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 2.92 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 8.43 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE = 17.20 ** CONFLUENCE DATA ** STREAM RUNOFF Tc INTENSITY AREA NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HOUR) (ACRE) 1 8.83 10.96 3.410 3.46 2 17.20 15.60 2.918 8.43 *********************************WARNING********************************** IN THIS COMPUTER PROGRAM, THE CONFLUENCE VALUE USED IS BASED ON THE RCFC&WCD FORMULA OF PLATE D-1 AS DEFAULT VALUE. THIS FORMULA WILL NOT NECESSARILY RESULT IN THE MAXIMUM VALUE OF PEAK FLOW. ************************************************************************** RAINFALL INTENSITY AND TIME OF CONCENTRATION RATIO CONFLUENCE FORMULA USED FOR 2 STREAMS. ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE ** STREAM RUNOFF Tc INTENSITY NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HOUR) 1 20.92 10.96 3.410 2 24.76 15.60 2.918 COMPUTED CONFLUENCE ESTIMATES ARE AS FOLLOWS: PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 24.76 Tc(MIN.) = 15.60 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 11.9 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 15.00 TO NODE 14.00 = 1188.00 FEET. **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 14.00 TO NODE 14.00 IS CODE = 81 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>ADDITION OF SUBAREA TO MAINLINE PEAK FLOW<<<<< ============================================================================ 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = 2.918 COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .8557 SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "A" SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 0.35 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.87 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 12.2 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) = 25.63 1062 TC(MIN.) = 15.60 **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 14.00 TO NODE 14.00 IS CODE = 81 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>ADDITION OF SUBAREA TO MAINLINE PEAK FLOW<<<<< ============================================================================ 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = 2.918 CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .7448 SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "A" SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 0.43 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.93 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 12.7 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) = 26.57 TC(MIN.) = 15.60 **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 14.00 TO NODE 19.00 IS CODE = 31 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>COMPUTE PIPE-FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<< >>>>>USING COMPUTER-ESTIMATED PIPESIZE (NON-PRESSURE FLOW)<<<<< ============================================================================ ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 295.60 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 295.00 FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = 119.00 MANNING'S N = 0.012 DEPTH OF FLOW IN 30.0 INCH PIPE IS 21.5 INCHES PIPE-FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 7.05 ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = 30.00 NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE-FLOW(CFS) = 26.57 PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 0.28 Tc(MIN.) = 15.88 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 15.00 TO NODE 19.00 = 1307.00 FEET. **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 19.00 TO NODE 19.00 IS CODE = 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE<<<<< ============================================================================ TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 1 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = 15.88 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 2.89 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 12.67 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE = 26.57 **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 10.00 TO NODE 30.00 IS CODE = 21 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< ============================================================================ ASSUMED INITIAL SUBAREA UNIFORM DEVELOPMENT IS CONDOMINIUM TC = K*[(LENGTH**3)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**.2 INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = 278.00 UPSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = 306.10 DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = 304.20 ELEVATION DIFFERENCE(FEET) = 1.90 TC = 0.359*[( 278.00**3)/( 1.90)]**.2 = 9.247 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = 3.675 CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .7629 SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "A" SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 1.49 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.53 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) = 1.49 **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 30.00 TO NODE 31.00 IS CODE = 61 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1063 >>>>>COMPUTE STREET FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<< >>>>>(STANDARD CURB SECTION USED)<<<<< ============================================================================ UPSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = 304.20 DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = 301.90 STREET LENGTH(FEET) = 227.00 CURB HEIGHT(INCHES) = 6.0 STREET HALFWIDTH(FEET) = 16.00 DISTANCE FROM CROWN TO CROSSFALL GRADEBREAK(FEET) = 11.00 INSIDE STREET CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) = 0.020 OUTSIDE STREET CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) = 0.020 SPECIFIED NUMBER OF HALFSTREETS CARRYING RUNOFF = 1 Manning's FRICTION FACTOR for Streetflow Section(curb-to-curb) = 0.0150 **TRAVEL TIME COMPUTED USING ESTIMATED FLOW(CFS) = 2.30 STREETFLOW MODEL RESULTS USING ESTIMATED FLOW: STREET FLOW DEPTH(FEET) = 0.32 HALFSTREET FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) = 9.63 AVERAGE FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 2.20 PRODUCT OF DEPTH&VELOCITY(FT*FT/SEC.) = 0.70 STREET FLOW TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 1.72 Tc(MIN.) = 10.97 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = 3.408 CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .7570 SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "A" SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 0.63 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 1.63 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 1.2 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 3.11 END OF SUBAREA STREET FLOW HYDRAULICS: DEPTH(FEET) = 0.34 HALFSTREET FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) = 10.93 FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 2.37 DEPTH*VELOCITY(FT*FT/SEC.) = 0.82 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 10.00 TO NODE 31.00 = 505.00 FEET. **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 31.00 TO NODE 19.00 IS CODE = 31 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>COMPUTE PIPE-FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<< >>>>>USING COMPUTER-ESTIMATED PIPESIZE (NON-PRESSURE FLOW)<<<<< ============================================================================ ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 296.80 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 295.00 FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = 23.00 MANNING'S N = 0.012 ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) INCREASED TO 18.000 DEPTH OF FLOW IN 18.0 INCH PIPE IS 3.9 INCHES PIPE-FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 11.22 ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = 18.00 NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE-FLOW(CFS) = 3.11 PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 0.03 Tc(MIN.) = 11.00 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 10.00 TO NODE 19.00 = 528.00 FEET. **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 19.00 TO NODE 19.00 IS CODE = 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE<<<<< >>>>>AND COMPUTE VARIOUS CONFLUENCED STREAM VALUES<<<<< ============================================================================ TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 2 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = 11.00 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 3.40 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 1.16 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE = 3.11 ** CONFLUENCE DATA ** STREAM RUNOFF Tc INTENSITY AREA 1064 NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HOUR) (ACRE) 1 26.57 15.88 2.895 12.67 2 3.11 11.00 3.404 1.16 *********************************WARNING********************************** IN THIS COMPUTER PROGRAM, THE CONFLUENCE VALUE USED IS BASED ON THE RCFC&WCD FORMULA OF PLATE D-1 AS DEFAULT VALUE. THIS FORMULA WILL NOT NECESSARILY RESULT IN THE MAXIMUM VALUE OF PEAK FLOW. ************************************************************************** RAINFALL INTENSITY AND TIME OF CONCENTRATION RATIO CONFLUENCE FORMULA USED FOR 2 STREAMS. ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE ** STREAM RUNOFF Tc INTENSITY NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HOUR) 1 21.52 11.00 3.404 2 29.21 15.88 2.895 COMPUTED CONFLUENCE ESTIMATES ARE AS FOLLOWS: PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 29.21 Tc(MIN.) = 15.88 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 13.8 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 15.00 TO NODE 19.00 = 1307.00 FEET. **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 19.00 TO NODE 19.00 IS CODE = 81 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>ADDITION OF SUBAREA TO MAINLINE PEAK FLOW<<<<< ============================================================================ 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = 2.895 COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .8555 SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "A" SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 0.09 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.22 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 13.9 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) = 29.44 TC(MIN.) = 15.88 **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 19.00 TO NODE 19.00 IS CODE = 81 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>ADDITION OF SUBAREA TO MAINLINE PEAK FLOW<<<<< ============================================================================ 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = 2.895 SINGLE-FAMILY(1-ACRE LOT) RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .5439 SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "A" SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 0.54 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.85 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 14.5 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) = 30.29 TC(MIN.) = 15.88 **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 19.00 TO NODE 20.00 IS CODE = 31 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>COMPUTE PIPE-FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<< >>>>>USING COMPUTER-ESTIMATED PIPESIZE (NON-PRESSURE FLOW)<<<<< ============================================================================ ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 295.00 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 294.70 FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = 60.00 MANNING'S N = 0.012 DEPTH OF FLOW IN 30.0 INCH PIPE IS 24.3 INCHES PIPE-FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 7.11 ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = 30.00 NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE-FLOW(CFS) = 30.29 PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 0.14 Tc(MIN.) = 16.02 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 15.00 TO NODE 20.00 = 1367.00 FEET. 1065 **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 20.00 TO NODE 20.00 IS CODE = 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE<<<<< ============================================================================ TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 1 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = 16.02 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 2.88 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 14.46 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE = 30.29 **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 10.00 TO NODE 35.00 IS CODE = 21 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< ============================================================================ ASSUMED INITIAL SUBAREA UNIFORM DEVELOPMENT IS SINGLE FAMILY (1/4 ACRE) TC = K*[(LENGTH**3)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**.2 INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = 327.00 UPSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = 306.10 DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = 304.20 ELEVATION DIFFERENCE(FEET) = 1.90 TC = 0.393*[( 327.00**3)/( 1.90)]**.2 = 11.141 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = 3.385 SINGLE-FAMILY(1/4 ACRE LOT) RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .6950 SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "A" SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 3.46 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 1.47 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) = 3.46 **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 35.00 TO NODE 36.00 IS CODE = 61 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>COMPUTE STREET FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<< >>>>>(STANDARD CURB SECTION USED)<<<<< ============================================================================ UPSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = 304.20 DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = 303.00 STREET LENGTH(FEET) = 228.00 CURB HEIGHT(INCHES) = 6.0 STREET HALFWIDTH(FEET) = 16.00 DISTANCE FROM CROWN TO CROSSFALL GRADEBREAK(FEET) = 11.00 INSIDE STREET CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) = 0.020 OUTSIDE STREET CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) = 0.020 SPECIFIED NUMBER OF HALFSTREETS CARRYING RUNOFF = 1 Manning's FRICTION FACTOR for Streetflow Section(curb-to-curb) = 0.0150 **TRAVEL TIME COMPUTED USING ESTIMATED FLOW(CFS) = 4.60 STREETFLOW MODEL RESULTS USING ESTIMATED FLOW: STREET FLOW DEPTH(FEET) = 0.42 HALFSTREET FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) = 14.67 AVERAGE FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 2.03 PRODUCT OF DEPTH&VELOCITY(FT*FT/SEC.) = 0.85 STREET FLOW TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 1.88 Tc(MIN.) = 13.02 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = 3.160 CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .7511 SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "A" SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 0.96 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 2.28 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 2.4 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 5.74 END OF SUBAREA STREET FLOW HYDRAULICS: DEPTH(FEET) = 0.45 HALFSTREET FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) = 16.00 1066 FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 2.14 DEPTH*VELOCITY(FT*FT/SEC.) = 0.95 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 10.00 TO NODE 36.00 = 555.00 FEET. **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 36.00 TO NODE 37.00 IS CODE = 31 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>COMPUTE PIPE-FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<< >>>>>USING COMPUTER-ESTIMATED PIPESIZE (NON-PRESSURE FLOW)<<<<< ============================================================================ ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 297.50 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 297.30 FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = 35.00 MANNING'S N = 0.012 DEPTH OF FLOW IN 18.0 INCH PIPE IS 10.9 INCHES PIPE-FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 5.11 ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = 18.00 NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE-FLOW(CFS) = 5.74 PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 0.11 Tc(MIN.) = 13.13 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 10.00 TO NODE 37.00 = 590.00 FEET. **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 37.00 TO NODE 37.00 IS CODE = 81 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>ADDITION OF SUBAREA TO MAINLINE PEAK FLOW<<<<< ============================================================================ 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = 3.148 COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .8574 SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "A" SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 0.04 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.11 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 2.5 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) = 5.84 TC(MIN.) = 13.13 **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 37.00 TO NODE 20.00 IS CODE = 31 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>COMPUTE PIPE-FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<< >>>>>USING COMPUTER-ESTIMATED PIPESIZE (NON-PRESSURE FLOW)<<<<< ============================================================================ ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 297.30 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 294.70 FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = 14.00 MANNING'S N = 0.012 ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) INCREASED TO 18.000 DEPTH OF FLOW IN 18.0 INCH PIPE IS 4.3 INCHES PIPE-FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 18.33 ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = 18.00 NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE-FLOW(CFS) = 5.84 PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 0.01 Tc(MIN.) = 13.14 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 10.00 TO NODE 20.00 = 604.00 FEET. **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 20.00 TO NODE 20.00 IS CODE = 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE<<<<< >>>>>AND COMPUTE VARIOUS CONFLUENCED STREAM VALUES<<<<< ============================================================================ TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 2 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = 13.14 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 3.15 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 2.47 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE = 5.84 ** CONFLUENCE DATA ** STREAM RUNOFF Tc INTENSITY AREA NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HOUR) (ACRE) 1 30.29 16.02 2.883 14.46 1067 2 5.84 13.14 3.146 2.47 *********************************WARNING********************************** IN THIS COMPUTER PROGRAM, THE CONFLUENCE VALUE USED IS BASED ON THE RCFC&WCD FORMULA OF PLATE D-1 AS DEFAULT VALUE. THIS FORMULA WILL NOT NECESSARILY RESULT IN THE MAXIMUM VALUE OF PEAK FLOW. ************************************************************************** RAINFALL INTENSITY AND TIME OF CONCENTRATION RATIO CONFLUENCE FORMULA USED FOR 2 STREAMS. ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE ** STREAM RUNOFF Tc INTENSITY NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HOUR) 1 30.69 13.14 3.146 2 35.64 16.02 2.883 COMPUTED CONFLUENCE ESTIMATES ARE AS FOLLOWS: PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 35.64 Tc(MIN.) = 16.02 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 16.9 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 15.00 TO NODE 20.00 = 1367.00 FEET. **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 15.00 TO NODE 40.00 IS CODE = 21 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< ============================================================================ ASSUMED INITIAL SUBAREA UNIFORM DEVELOPMENT IS SINGLE FAMILY(1/2 ACRE) TC = K*[(LENGTH**3)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**.2 INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = 312.00 UPSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = 311.00 DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = 307.60 ELEVATION DIFFERENCE(FEET) = 3.40 TC = 0.422*[( 312.00**3)/( 3.40)]**.2 = 10.366 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = 3.494 SINGLE-FAMILY(1/2 ACRE LOT) RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .6582 SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "A" SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 1.79 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.78 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) = 1.79 **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 40.00 TO NODE 41.00 IS CODE = 61 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>COMPUTE STREET FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<< >>>>>(STANDARD CURB SECTION USED)<<<<< ============================================================================ UPSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = 307.60 DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION(FEET) = 304.50 STREET LENGTH(FEET) = 402.00 CURB HEIGHT(INCHES) = 6.0 STREET HALFWIDTH(FEET) = 16.00 DISTANCE FROM CROWN TO CROSSFALL GRADEBREAK(FEET) = 11.00 INSIDE STREET CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) = 0.020 OUTSIDE STREET CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) = 0.020 SPECIFIED NUMBER OF HALFSTREETS CARRYING RUNOFF = 1 Manning's FRICTION FACTOR for Streetflow Section(curb-to-curb) = 0.0150 **TRAVEL TIME COMPUTED USING ESTIMATED FLOW(CFS) = 4.12 STREETFLOW MODEL RESULTS USING ESTIMATED FLOW: STREET FLOW DEPTH(FEET) = 0.39 HALFSTREET FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) = 12.97 AVERAGE FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 2.29 1068 PRODUCT OF DEPTH&VELOCITY(FT*FT/SEC.) = 0.88 STREET FLOW TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 2.93 Tc(MIN.) = 13.30 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = 3.131 SINGLE-FAMILY(1/4 ACRE LOT) RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .6862 SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "A" SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 2.16 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 4.64 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 2.9 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 6.43 END OF SUBAREA STREET FLOW HYDRAULICS: DEPTH(FEET) = 0.44 HALFSTREET FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) = 15.52 FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 2.55 DEPTH*VELOCITY(FT*FT/SEC.) = 1.11 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 15.00 TO NODE 41.00 = 714.00 FEET. **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 41.00 TO NODE 41.00 IS CODE = 81 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>ADDITION OF SUBAREA TO MAINLINE PEAK FLOW<<<<< ============================================================================ 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HOUR) = 3.131 CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .7503 SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "A" SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 0.91 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 2.14 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 3.9 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) = 8.57 TC(MIN.) = 13.30 ============================================================================ END OF STUDY SUMMARY: TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 3.9 TC(MIN.) = 13.30 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 8.57 ============================================================================ ============================================================================ END OF RATIONAL METHOD ANALYSIS 1069 APPENDIX D FLOOD ROUTING CALCULATIONS THROUGH R-TANK DETENTION BASINS 1070 DMA A 1071 Step 6 - R-Tank Configuration Directions 155,235 ft3 Calculated from previous tabs 6.2 - R-Tank storage volume * 68,500 ft3 Enter design storage volume in R-Tanks 6.3 - R-Tank configuration ** Pent Select Mini, Single, Double, etc from toggle 83.46 inches Exterior height of selected unit 6.4 - R-Tank base area for selected configuration 10,367.4 ft2 Compare to available area (calculation assumes 95% voids in R-Tank) 6.5 - Will R-Tank infiltrate? Yes Select Yes or No from Toggle 6.6 - Measured Infiltration Rate 5.50 inches / hour Enter inches per hour field measured infiltration rate 6.7 - Infiltration Factor of Safety 3.0 Desired infiltration rate factor of safety (min. 1.0, typ. 2.0) 6.8 - Desired treatment time 72 hours Select 24, 48, 72 or 96 hours from Toggle Step 7 (Optional) - Outfall Pipe 7.1 - Outfall pipe size 12 inches Enter outfall pipe size in inches 7.2 - Number of pipes 1 Enter number of outfall pipes or 0 for no pipes 7.3 - Set overflow of outlet pipe at ceiling? Yes 7.4 - Outfall pipe elevation above bottom 0 inches Distance from bottom of tank to pipe invert Step 8 - Evaluation of Results 8.1 - Calculated storage depth 83.43 inches 8.2 - Does R-Tank provide enough storage? Yes 8.3 - Volume infiltrated 100,500 ft3 Calculated total volume infiltrated 8.4 - Water Quality Volume infiltrated? Yes Did the entire WQv Infiltrate? Yes/No 8.5 - Drain Time 64 hours 8.6 - R-Tank drain within desired time?Yes 8.7 - Volume below outlet pipe 0 ft3 Calculated from Steps 6.4 and 7.4 Stormwater Management System Incremental Incremental Incremental Remaining R-Tank Volume to Infiltration Pipe(s) Volume Water Time R-Tank Out Out in R-Tank Elevation (hrs)(ft3) (ft 3) (ft 3) (ft 3)(ft) 0.0 0.2 346 317 0 29 0.00 0.4 541 317 0 253 0.02 0.6 542 317 0 478 0.05 0.8 542 317 0 704 0.07 1.0 543 317 0 930 0.09 1.2 544 317 0 1,157 0.11 1.4 544 317 0 1,384 0.13 1.6 545 317 0 1,612 0.16 1.8 545 317 0 1,841 0.18 2.0 546 317 0 2,070 0.20 2.2 555 317 0 2,309 0.22 2.4 573 317 0 2,566 0.25 2.6 591 317 0 2,840 0.27 2.8 609 317 0 3,133 0.30 3.0 627 317 0 3,444 0.33 3.2 645 317 0 3,772 0.36 3.4 663 317 0 4,119 0.40 3.6 681 317 0 4,484 0.43 3.8 699 317 0 4,867 0.47 4.0 717 317 0 5,267 0.51 4.2 730 317 0 5,680 0.55 4.4 737 317 0 6,100 0.59 4.6 744 317 0 6,527 0.63 4.8 750 317 0 6,961 0.67 5.0 757 317 0 7,401 0.71 5.2 764 317 0 7,848 0.76 5.4 771 317 0 8,303 0.80 5.6 778 317 0 8,764 0.85 5.8 785 317 0 9,231 0.89 6.0 791 317 0 9,706 0.94 6.2 828 317 0 10,217 0.99 6.4 895 317 0 10,796 1.04 6.6 962 317 0 11,442 1.10 6.8 1,030 317 0 12,155 1.17 7.0 1,097 317 0 12,934 1.25 R-TANK DESIGN WORKSHEET * Trial and error. For detention and harvesting applications, enter volume approximately equal to volume in step 6.1. For infiltration or pipe release applications, enter voume less than volume in step 6.1. ** For detention, harvesting, or pipe release applications, entering Triple, Quad, or Pent units will minimize footprint. For infiltration applications, entering Mini, Single, or Double provides more surface area per unit volume and will increase infiltration volume. Yes = valid design, No = larger storage volume required Did R-Tank drain within time selected in 6.8 6.1 - Total Volume Routed to R-Tank Select "Yes" for infiltration/overflow application; Select "No" for detention release. 1072 7.2 1,140 317 0 13,758 1.33 7.4 1,160 317 0 14,601 1.41 7.6 1,180 317 0 15,464 1.49 7.8 1,200 317 0 16,347 1.58 8.0 1,220 317 0 17,249 1.66 8.2 1,359 317 0 18,291 1.76 8.4 1,617 317 0 19,591 1.89 8.6 1,873 317 0 21,147 2.04 8.8 2,114 317 0 22,944 2.21 9.0 2,352 317 0 24,980 2.41 9.2 2,700 317 0 27,363 2.64 9.4 3,157 317 0 30,203 2.91 9.6 4,299 317 0 34,185 3.30 9.8 10,621 317 0 44,490 4.29 10.0 19,739 317 404 63,508 6.13 10.2 5,061 317 1,209 67,043 6.47 10.4 3,943 317 1,658 69,011 6.66 10.6 2,931 317 1,835 69,790 6.73 10.8 2,552 317 1,910 70,116 6.76 11.0 2,279 317 1,919 70,159 6.77 11.2 2,093 317 1,893 70,042 6.76 11.4 1,993 317 1,853 69,866 6.74 11.6 1,894 317 1,801 69,642 6.72 11.8 1,795 317 1,741 69,378 6.69 12.0 1,695 317 1,674 69,082 6.66 12.2 1,614 317 1,604 68,776 6.63 12.4 1,552 317 1,536 68,476 6.60 12.6 1,490 317 1,468 68,181 6.58 12.8 1,428 317 1,402 67,890 6.55 13.0 1,366 317 1,337 67,603 6.52 13.2 1,304 317 1,272 67,318 6.49 13.4 1,242 317 1,207 67,036 6.47 13.6 1,180 317 1,144 66,755 6.44 13.8 1,118 317 1,080 66,476 6.41 14.0 1,056 317 1,017 66,198 6.39 14.2 1,018 317 958 65,942 6.36 14.4 1,006 317 908 65,723 6.34 14.6 994 317 865 65,534 6.32 14.8 981 317 828 65,370 6.31 15.0 969 317 795 65,227 6.29 15.2 956 317 766 65,100 6.28 15.4 944 317 740 64,987 6.27 15.6 931 317 717 64,884 6.26 15.8 919 317 696 64,791 6.25 16.0 907 317 676 64,704 6.24 16.2 894 317 658 64,624 6.23 16.4 882 317 641 64,548 6.23 16.6 869 317 624 64,477 6.22 16.8 857 317 609 64,408 6.21 17.0 844 317 594 64,342 6.21 17.2 832 317 579 64,278 6.20 17.4 820 317 565 64,216 6.19 17.6 807 317 551 64,156 6.19 17.8 795 317 538 64,096 6.18 18.0 782 317 524 64,038 6.18 18.2 770 317 511 63,980 6.17 18.4 758 317 498 63,923 6.17 18.6 745 317 485 63,866 6.16 18.8 733 317 472 63,810 6.15 19.0 720 317 459 63,754 6.15 19.2 708 317 447 63,698 6.14 19.4 695 317 434 63,643 6.14 19.6 683 317 422 63,587 6.13 19.8 671 317 409 63,532 6.13 20.0 658 317 396 63,477 6.12 20.2 646 317 384 63,422 6.12 20.4 633 317 371 63,367 6.11 20.6 621 317 359 63,313 6.11 20.8 609 317 346 63,258 6.10 21.0 596 317 334 63,203 6.10 21.2 584 317 322 63,149 6.09 21.4 571 317 309 63,094 6.09 21.6 559 317 297 63,039 6.08 21.8 546 317 284 62,985 6.08 22.0 534 317 272 62,930 6.07 22.2 522 317 259 62,876 6.06 22.4 509 317 247 62,821 6.06 22.6 497 317 234 62,767 6.05 22.8 484 317 222 62,712 6.05 23.0 472 317 210 62,658 6.04 23.2 459 317 197 62,603 6.04 23.4 447 317 185 62,549 6.03 23.6 435 317 172 62,494 6.03 23.8 422 317 160 62,440 6.02 24.0 410 317 148 62,385 6.02 24.2 80 317 76 62,072 5.99 24.4 80 317 18 61,817 5.96 24.6 35 317 0 61,536 5.94 24.8 0 317 0 61,219 5.90 25.0 0 317 0 60,902 5.87 25.2 0 317 0 60,585 5.84 1073 25.4 0 317 0 60,268 5.81 25.6 0 317 0 59,952 5.78 25.8 0 317 0 59,635 5.75 26.0 0 317 0 59,318 5.72 26.2 0 317 0 59,001 5.69 26.4 0 317 0 58,684 5.66 26.6 0 317 0 58,368 5.63 26.8 0 317 0 58,051 5.60 27.0 0 317 0 57,734 5.57 27.2 0 317 0 57,417 5.54 27.4 0 317 0 57,101 5.51 27.6 0 317 0 56,784 5.48 27.8 0 317 0 56,467 5.45 28.0 0 317 0 56,150 5.42 28.2 0 317 0 55,833 5.39 28.4 0 317 0 55,517 5.35 28.6 0 317 0 55,200 5.32 28.8 0 317 0 54,883 5.29 29.0 0 317 0 54,566 5.26 29.2 0 317 0 54,250 5.23 29.4 0 317 0 53,933 5.20 29.6 0 317 0 53,616 5.17 29.8 0 317 0 53,299 5.14 30.0 0 317 0 52,982 5.11 30.2 0 317 0 52,666 5.08 30.4 0 317 0 52,349 5.05 30.6 0 317 0 52,032 5.02 30.8 0 317 0 51,715 4.99 31.0 0 317 0 51,399 4.96 31.2 0 317 0 51,082 4.93 31.4 0 317 0 50,765 4.90 31.6 0 317 0 50,448 4.87 31.8 0 317 0 50,131 4.84 32.0 0 317 0 49,815 4.80 32.2 0 317 0 49,498 4.77 32.4 0 317 0 49,181 4.74 32.6 0 317 0 48,864 4.71 32.8 0 317 0 48,547 4.68 33.0 0 317 0 48,231 4.65 33.2 0 317 0 47,914 4.62 33.4 0 317 0 47,597 4.59 33.6 0 317 0 47,280 4.56 33.8 0 317 0 46,964 4.53 34.0 0 317 0 46,647 4.50 34.2 0 317 0 46,330 4.47 34.4 0 317 0 46,013 4.44 34.6 0 317 0 45,696 4.41 34.8 0 317 0 45,380 4.38 35.0 0 317 0 45,063 4.35 35.2 0 317 0 44,746 4.32 35.4 0 317 0 44,429 4.29 35.6 0 317 0 44,113 4.25 35.8 0 317 0 43,796 4.22 36.0 0 317 0 43,479 4.19 36.2 0 317 0 43,162 4.16 36.4 0 317 0 42,845 4.13 36.6 0 317 0 42,529 4.10 36.8 0 317 0 42,212 4.07 37.0 0 317 0 41,895 4.04 37.2 0 317 0 41,578 4.01 37.4 0 317 0 41,261 3.98 37.6 0 317 0 40,945 3.95 37.8 0 317 0 40,628 3.92 38.0 0 317 0 40,311 3.89 38.2 0 317 0 39,994 3.86 38.4 0 317 0 39,678 3.83 38.6 0 317 0 39,361 3.80 38.8 0 317 0 39,044 3.77 39.0 0 317 0 38,727 3.74 39.2 0 317 0 38,410 3.70 39.4 0 317 0 38,094 3.67 39.6 0 317 0 37,777 3.64 39.8 0 317 0 37,460 3.61 40.0 0 317 0 37,143 3.58 40.2 0 317 0 36,827 3.55 40.4 0 317 0 36,510 3.52 40.6 0 317 0 36,193 3.49 40.8 0 317 0 35,876 3.46 41.0 0 317 0 35,559 3.43 41.2 0 317 0 35,243 3.40 41.4 0 317 0 34,926 3.37 41.6 0 317 0 34,609 3.34 41.8 0 317 0 34,292 3.31 42.0 0 317 0 33,976 3.28 42.2 0 317 0 33,659 3.25 42.4 0 317 0 33,342 3.22 42.6 0 317 0 33,025 3.19 42.8 0 317 0 32,708 3.15 43.0 0 317 0 32,392 3.12 43.2 0 317 0 32,075 3.09 43.4 0 317 0 31,758 3.06 1074 43.6 0 317 0 31,441 3.03 43.8 0 317 0 31,124 3.00 44.0 0 317 0 30,808 2.97 44.2 0 317 0 30,491 2.94 44.4 0 317 0 30,174 2.91 44.6 0 317 0 29,857 2.88 44.8 0 317 0 29,541 2.85 45.0 0 317 0 29,224 2.82 45.2 0 317 0 28,907 2.79 45.4 0 317 0 28,590 2.76 45.6 0 317 0 28,273 2.73 45.8 0 317 0 27,957 2.70 46.0 0 317 0 27,640 2.67 46.2 0 317 0 27,323 2.64 46.4 0 317 0 27,006 2.60 46.6 0 317 0 26,690 2.57 46.8 0 317 0 26,373 2.54 47.0 0 317 0 26,056 2.51 47.2 0 317 0 25,739 2.48 47.4 0 317 0 25,422 2.45 47.6 0 317 0 25,106 2.42 47.8 0 317 0 24,789 2.39 48.0 0 317 0 24,472 2.36 48.2 0 317 0 24,155 2.33 48.4 0 317 0 23,839 2.30 48.6 0 317 0 23,522 2.27 48.8 0 317 0 23,205 2.24 49.0 0 317 0 22,888 2.21 49.2 0 317 0 22,571 2.18 49.4 0 317 0 22,255 2.15 49.6 0 317 0 21,938 2.12 49.8 0 317 0 21,621 2.09 50.0 0 317 0 21,304 2.05 50.2 0 317 0 20,987 2.02 50.4 0 317 0 20,671 1.99 50.6 0 317 0 20,354 1.96 50.8 0 317 0 20,037 1.93 51.0 0 317 0 19,720 1.90 51.2 0 317 0 19,404 1.87 51.4 0 317 0 19,087 1.84 51.6 0 317 0 18,770 1.81 51.8 0 317 0 18,453 1.78 52.0 0 317 0 18,136 1.75 52.2 0 317 0 17,820 1.72 52.4 0 317 0 17,503 1.69 52.6 0 317 0 17,186 1.66 52.8 0 317 0 16,869 1.63 53.0 0 317 0 16,553 1.60 53.2 0 317 0 16,236 1.57 53.4 0 317 0 15,919 1.54 53.6 0 317 0 15,602 1.50 53.8 0 317 0 15,285 1.47 54.0 0 317 0 14,969 1.44 54.2 0 317 0 14,652 1.41 54.4 0 317 0 14,335 1.38 54.6 0 317 0 14,018 1.35 54.8 0 317 0 13,701 1.32 55.0 0 317 0 13,385 1.29 55.2 0 317 0 13,068 1.26 55.4 0 317 0 12,751 1.23 55.6 0 317 0 12,434 1.20 55.8 0 317 0 12,118 1.17 56.0 0 317 0 11,801 1.14 56.2 0 317 0 11,484 1.11 56.4 0 317 0 11,167 1.08 56.6 0 317 0 10,850 1.05 56.8 0 317 0 10,534 1.02 57.0 0 317 0 10,217 0.99 57.2 0 317 0 9,900 0.95 57.4 0 317 0 9,583 0.92 57.6 0 317 0 9,267 0.89 57.8 0 317 0 8,950 0.86 58.0 0 317 0 8,633 0.83 58.2 0 317 0 8,316 0.80 58.4 0 317 0 7,999 0.77 58.6 0 317 0 7,683 0.74 58.8 0 317 0 7,366 0.71 59.0 0 317 0 7,049 0.68 59.2 0 317 0 6,732 0.65 59.4 0 317 0 6,416 0.62 59.6 0 317 0 6,099 0.59 59.8 0 317 0 5,782 0.56 60.0 0 317 0 5,465 0.53 60.2 0 317 0 5,148 0.50 60.4 0 317 0 4,832 0.47 60.6 0 317 0 4,515 0.44 60.8 0 317 0 4,198 0.40 61.0 0 317 0 3,881 0.37 61.2 0 317 0 3,564 0.34 61.4 0 317 0 3,248 0.31 61.6 0 317 0 2,931 0.28 1075 61.8 0 317 0 2,614 0.25 62.0 0 317 0 2,297 0.22 62.2 0 317 0 1,981 0.19 62.4 0 317 0 1,664 0.16 62.6 0 317 0 1,347 0.13 62.8 0 317 0 1,030 0.10 63.0 0 317 0 713 0.07 63.2 0 317 0 397 0.04 63.4 0 317 0 80 0.01 63.6 0 80 0 0 0.00 63.8 0 0 0 0 0.00 64.0 0 0 0 0 0.00 64.2 0 0 0 0 0.00 64.4 0 0 0 0 0.00 64.6 0 0 0 0 0.00 64.8 0 0 0 0 0.00 65.0 0 0 0 0 0.00 65.2 0 0 0 0 0.00 65.4 0 0 0 0 0.00 65.6 0 0 0 0 0.00 65.8 0 0 0 0 0.00 66.0 0 0 0 0 0.00 66.2 0 0 0 0 0.00 66.4 0 0 0 0 0.00 66.6 0 0 0 0 0.00 66.8 0 0 0 0 0.00 67.0 0 0 0 0 0.00 67.2 0 0 0 0 0.00 67.4 0 0 0 0 0.00 67.6 0 0 0 0 0.00 67.8 0 0 0 0 0.00 68.0 0 0 0 0 0.00 68.2 0 0 0 0 0.00 68.4 0 0 0 0 0.00 68.6 0 0 0 0 0.00 68.8 0 0 0 0 0.00 69.0 0 0 0 0 0.00 69.2 0 0 0 0 0.00 69.4 0 0 0 0 0.00 69.6 0 0 0 0 0.00 69.8 0 0 0 0 0.00 70.0 0 0 0 0 0.00 70.2 0 0 0 0 0.00 70.4 0 0 0 0 0.00 70.6 0 0 0 0 0.00 70.8 0 0 0 0 0.00 71.0 0 0 0 0 0.00 71.2 0 0 0 0 0.00 71.4 0 0 0 0 0.00 71.6 0 0 0 0 0.00 71.8 0 0 0 0 0.00 72.0 0 0 0 0 0.00 72.2 0 0 0 0 0.00 72.4 0 0 0 0 0.00 72.6 0 0 0 0 0.00 72.8 0 0 0 0 0.00 73.0 0 0 0 0 0.00 73.2 0 0 0 0 0.00 73.4 0 0 0 0 0.00 73.6 0 0 0 0 0.00 73.8 0 0 0 0 0.00 74.0 0 0 0 0 0.00 74.2 0 0 0 0 0.00 74.4 0 0 0 0 0.00 74.6 0 0 0 0 0.00 74.8 0 0 0 0 0.00 75.0 0 0 0 0 0.00 75.2 0 0 0 0 0.00 75.4 0 0 0 0 0.00 75.6 0 0 0 0 0.00 75.8 0 0 0 0 0.00 76.0 0 0 0 0 0.00 76.2 0 0 0 0 0.00 76.4 0 0 0 0 0.00 76.6 0 0 0 0 0.00 76.8 0 0 0 0 0.00 77.0 0 0 0 0 0.00 77.2 0 0 0 0 0.00 77.4 0 0 0 0 0.00 77.6 0 0 0 0 0.00 77.8 0 0 0 0 0.00 78.0 0 0 0 0 0.00 78.2 0 0 0 0 0.00 78.4 0 0 0 0 0.00 78.6 0 0 0 0 0.00 78.8 0 0 0 0 0.00 79.0 0 0 0 0 0.00 79.2 0 0 0 0 0.00 79.4 0 0 0 0 0.00 79.6 0 0 0 0 0.00 79.8 0 0 0 0 0.00 1076 80.0 0 0 0 0 0.00 80.2 0 0 0 0 0.00 80.4 0 0 0 0 0.00 80.6 0 0 0 0 0.00 80.8 0 0 0 0 0.00 81.0 0 0 0 0 0.00 81.2 0 0 0 0 0.00 81.4 0 0 0 0 0.00 81.6 0 0 0 0 0.00 81.8 0 0 0 0 0.00 82.0 0 0 0 0 0.00 82.2 0 0 0 0 0.00 82.4 0 0 0 0 0.00 82.6 0 0 0 0 0.00 82.8 0 0 0 0 0.00 83.0 0 0 0 0 0.00 83.2 0 0 0 0 0.00 83.4 0 0 0 0 0.00 83.6 0 0 0 0 0.00 83.8 0 0 0 0 0.00 84.0 0 0 0 0 0.00 84.2 0 0 0 0 0.00 84.4 0 0 0 0 0.00 84.6 0 0 0 0 0.00 84.8 0 0 0 0 0.00 85.0 0 0 0 0 0.00 85.2 0 0 0 0 0.00 85.4 0 0 0 0 0.00 85.6 0 0 0 0 0.00 85.8 0 0 0 0 0.00 86.0 0 0 0 0 0.00 86.2 0 0 0 0 0.00 86.4 0 0 0 0 0.00 86.6 0 0 0 0 0.00 86.8 0 0 0 0 0.00 87.0 0 0 0 0 0.00 87.2 0 0 0 0 0.00 87.4 0 0 0 0 0.00 87.6 0 0 0 0 0.00 87.8 0 0 0 0 0.00 88.0 0 0 0 0 0.00 88.2 0 0 0 0 0.00 88.4 0 0 0 0 0.00 88.6 0 0 0 0 0.00 88.8 0 0 0 0 0.00 89.0 0 0 0 0 0.00 89.2 0 0 0 0 0.00 89.4 0 0 0 0 0.00 89.6 0 0 0 0 0.00 89.8 0 0 0 0 0.00 90.0 0 0 0 0 0.00 90.2 0 0 0 0 0.00 90.4 0 0 0 0 0.00 90.6 0 0 0 0 0.00 90.8 0 0 0 0 0.00 91.0 0 0 0 0 0.00 91.2 0 0 0 0 0.00 91.4 0 0 0 0 0.00 91.6 0 0 0 0 0.00 91.8 0 0 0 0 0.00 92.0 0 0 0 0 0.00 92.2 0 0 0 0 0.00 92.4 0 0 0 0 0.00 92.6 0 0 0 0 0.00 92.8 0 0 0 0 0.00 93.0 0 0 0 0 0.00 93.2 0 0 0 0 0.00 93.4 0 0 0 0 0.00 93.6 0 0 0 0 0.00 93.8 0 0 0 0 0.00 94.0 0 0 0 0 0.00 94.2 0 0 0 0 0.00 94.4 0 0 0 0 0.00 94.6 0 0 0 0 0.00 94.8 0 0 0 0 0.00 95.0 0 0 0 0 0.00 95.2 0 0 0 0 0.00 95.4 0 0 0 0 0.00 95.6 0 0 0 0 0.00 95.8 0 0 0 0 0.00 96.0 0 0 0 0 0.00 Totals 155,235 100,500 54,735 1077 Contact: Project Name: Company: Location: Phone: Email: Step 9.1 - Volume Required Required storage capacity in cubic feet 68,500 cf (from previous Tab Calculations) Required tank volume at 95% voids: 72,105.26 cf Step 9.2 - Number of Units Required Tank Style Tank Height (in)*Number of Tanks Required Square Footage Required Pent 83.46 3368 10,360 *NOTE: Step 9.3 - Configure System Dimensions Enter the limiting dimension to install the system, including required 2-foot perimeter buffer. The worksheet will then show you the width and length in terms of total number of tanks, the footprint of your system, and the footprint of the excavation, assuming a 2-foot perimeter to compact backfill. Limiting Dimension:Width Length available:100 Feet Width available:100 Feet Number of units long: 40 40 Number of units long: 47 47 Number of units wide:85 85 Number of units wide:73 73 Tank Footprint:93.80 Feet Long Tank Footprint:110.22 Feet Long 111.49 Feet Wide 95.75 Feet Wide Excavation Footprint:97.80 Feet Long Excavation Footprint:114.22 Feet Long 115.49 Feet Wide 99.75 Feet Wide Tanks used in selected system: 3431 Contact your ACF representative for a list of all the materials you will need to build this system and estimated unit costs for all items to determine an estimate for the total system including installation. Stormwater Management System R-TANK LAYOUT WORKSHEET KMIKAMI@WILSONMIKAMI.COM 949 679-0090 You will typically want the bottom of the system to be above the water table or hard-pan, keeping in mind you need 18 inches of cover above the system. KRISTEN MIKAMI SHADOW RIDGE RESIDENCES Wilson Mikami Corporation PALM DESERT, CA 1078 DMA B 1079 Step 6 - R-Tank Configuration Directions 34,556 ft3 Calculated from previous tabs 6.2 - R-Tank storage volume * 13,710 ft3 Enter design storage volume in R-Tanks 6.3 - R-Tank configuration ** Pent Select Mini, Single, Double, etc from toggle 83.46 inches Exterior height of selected unit 6.4 - R-Tank base area for selected configuration 2,075.0 ft2 Compare to available area (calculation assumes 95% voids in R-Tank) 6.5 - Will R-Tank infiltrate? Yes Select Yes or No from Toggle 6.6 - Measured Infiltration Rate 5.50 inches / hour Enter inches per hour field measured infiltration rate 6.7 - Infiltration Factor of Safety 3.0 Desired infiltration rate factor of safety (min. 1.0, typ. 2.0) 6.8 - Desired treatment time 72 hours Select 24, 48, 72 or 96 hours from Toggle Step 7 (Optional) - Outfall Pipe 7.1 - Outfall pipe size 12 inches Enter outfall pipe size in inches 7.2 - Number of pipes 1 Enter number of outfall pipes or 0 for no pipes 7.3 - Set overflow of outlet pipe at ceiling? Yes 7.4 - Outfall pipe elevation above bottom 0 inches Distance from bottom of tank to pipe invert Step 8 - Evaluation of Results 8.1 - Calculated storage depth 83.46 inches 8.2 - Does R-Tank provide enough storage? Yes 8.3 - Volume infiltrated 20,128 ft3 Calculated total volume infiltrated 8.4 - Water Quality Volume infiltrated? Yes Did the entire WQv Infiltrate? Yes/No 8.5 - Drain Time 64 hours 8.6 - R-Tank drain within desired time?Yes 8.7 - Volume below outlet pipe 0 ft3 Calculated from Steps 6.4 and 7.4 Stormwater Management System Incremental Incremental Incremental Remaining R-Tank Volume to Infiltration Pipe(s) Volume Water Time R-Tank Out Out in R-Tank Elevation (hrs)(ft3) (ft 3) (ft 3) (ft 3)(ft) 0.0 0.2 80 63 0 17 0.01 0.4 80 63 0 33 0.02 0.6 80 63 0 50 0.02 0.8 80 63 0 66 0.03 1.0 88 63 0 91 0.04 1.2 121 63 0 149 0.07 1.4 121 63 0 206 0.10 1.6 121 63 0 264 0.13 1.8 121 63 0 322 0.16 2.0 122 63 0 380 0.18 2.2 124 63 0 441 0.21 2.4 128 63 0 505 0.24 2.6 132 63 0 573 0.28 2.8 136 63 0 645 0.31 3.0 140 63 0 722 0.35 3.2 144 63 0 802 0.39 3.4 148 63 0 886 0.43 3.6 152 63 0 975 0.47 3.8 156 63 0 1,067 0.51 4.0 160 63 0 1,163 0.56 4.2 162 63 0 1,262 0.61 4.4 164 63 0 1,363 0.66 4.6 166 63 0 1,465 0.71 4.8 167 63 0 1,569 0.76 5.0 169 63 0 1,674 0.81 5.2 170 63 0 1,780 0.86 5.4 172 63 0 1,889 0.91 5.6 173 63 0 1,998 0.96 5.8 175 63 0 2,110 1.02 6.0 176 63 0 2,222 1.07 6.2 184 63 0 2,343 1.13 6.4 199 63 0 2,479 1.19 6.6 214 63 0 2,630 1.27 6.8 229 63 0 2,796 1.35 7.0 244 63 0 2,977 1.43 R-TANK DESIGN WORKSHEET * Trial and error. For detention and harvesting applications, enter volume approximately equal to volume in step 6.1. For infiltration or pipe release applications, enter voume less than volume in step 6.1. ** For detention, harvesting, or pipe release applications, entering Triple, Quad, or Pent units will minimize footprint. For infiltration applications, entering Mini, Single, or Double provides more surface area per unit volume and will increase infiltration volume. Yes = valid design, No = larger storage volume required Did R-Tank drain within time selected in 6.8 6.1 - Total Volume Routed to R-Tank Select "Yes" for infiltration/overflow application; Select "No" for detention release. 1080 7.2 254 63 0 3,167 1.53 7.4 258 63 0 3,362 1.62 7.6 263 63 0 3,561 1.72 7.8 267 63 0 3,765 1.81 8.0 271 63 0 3,973 1.91 8.2 302 63 0 4,212 2.03 8.4 360 63 0 4,508 2.17 8.6 417 63 0 4,862 2.34 8.8 471 63 0 5,269 2.54 9.0 524 63 0 5,729 2.76 9.2 601 63 0 6,267 3.02 9.4 703 63 0 6,906 3.33 9.6 957 63 0 7,800 3.76 9.8 2,364 63 0 10,101 4.87 10.0 4,394 63 1,924 12,507 6.03 10.2 1,127 63 1,126 12,445 6.00 10.4 878 63 837 12,422 5.99 10.6 652 63 607 12,404 5.98 10.8 568 63 512 12,397 5.97 11.0 507 63 449 12,392 5.97 11.2 466 63 406 12,388 5.97 11.4 444 63 382 12,387 5.97 11.6 422 63 360 12,385 5.97 11.8 399 63 338 12,383 5.97 12.0 377 63 316 12,381 5.97 12.2 359 63 297 12,380 5.97 12.4 346 63 283 12,379 5.97 12.6 332 63 269 12,378 5.97 12.8 318 63 256 12,377 5.96 13.0 304 63 242 12,376 5.96 13.2 290 63 228 12,374 5.96 13.4 276 63 214 12,373 5.96 13.6 263 63 200 12,372 5.96 13.8 249 63 186 12,371 5.96 14.0 235 63 173 12,370 5.96 14.2 227 63 164 12,369 5.96 14.4 224 63 161 12,369 5.96 14.6 221 63 158 12,369 5.96 14.8 218 63 155 12,369 5.96 15.0 216 63 152 12,369 5.96 15.2 213 63 150 12,368 5.96 15.4 210 63 147 12,368 5.96 15.6 207 63 144 12,368 5.96 15.8 205 63 141 12,368 5.96 16.0 202 63 139 12,367 5.96 16.2 199 63 136 12,367 5.96 16.4 196 63 133 12,367 5.96 16.6 194 63 130 12,367 5.96 16.8 191 63 128 12,367 5.96 17.0 188 63 125 12,366 5.96 17.2 185 63 122 12,366 5.96 17.4 182 63 119 12,366 5.96 17.6 180 63 117 12,366 5.96 17.8 177 63 114 12,365 5.96 18.0 174 63 111 12,365 5.96 18.2 171 63 108 12,365 5.96 18.4 169 63 105 12,365 5.96 18.6 166 63 103 12,365 5.96 18.8 163 63 100 12,364 5.96 19.0 160 63 97 12,364 5.96 19.2 158 63 94 12,364 5.96 19.4 155 63 92 12,364 5.96 19.6 152 63 89 12,364 5.96 19.8 149 63 86 12,363 5.96 20.0 147 63 83 12,363 5.96 20.2 144 63 81 12,363 5.96 20.4 141 63 78 12,363 5.96 20.6 138 63 75 12,362 5.96 20.8 135 63 72 12,362 5.96 21.0 133 63 70 12,362 5.96 21.2 130 63 67 12,362 5.96 21.4 127 63 64 12,362 5.96 21.6 124 63 61 12,361 5.96 21.8 122 63 58 12,361 5.96 22.0 119 63 56 12,361 5.96 22.2 116 63 53 12,361 5.96 22.4 113 63 50 12,361 5.96 22.6 111 63 47 12,360 5.96 22.8 108 63 45 12,360 5.96 23.0 105 63 42 12,360 5.96 23.2 102 63 39 12,360 5.96 23.4 100 63 36 12,359 5.96 23.6 97 63 34 12,359 5.96 23.8 94 63 31 12,359 5.96 24.0 91 63 28 12,359 5.96 24.2 80 63 17 12,358 5.96 24.4 80 63 17 12,358 5.96 24.6 35 63 0 12,329 5.94 24.8 0 63 0 12,266 5.91 25.0 0 63 0 12,203 5.88 25.2 0 63 0 12,139 5.85 1081 25.4 0 63 0 12,076 5.82 25.6 0 63 0 12,012 5.79 25.8 0 63 0 11,949 5.76 26.0 0 63 0 11,886 5.73 26.2 0 63 0 11,822 5.70 26.4 0 63 0 11,759 5.67 26.6 0 63 0 11,695 5.64 26.8 0 63 0 11,632 5.61 27.0 0 63 0 11,569 5.58 27.2 0 63 0 11,505 5.54 27.4 0 63 0 11,442 5.51 27.6 0 63 0 11,378 5.48 27.8 0 63 0 11,315 5.45 28.0 0 63 0 11,252 5.42 28.2 0 63 0 11,188 5.39 28.4 0 63 0 11,125 5.36 28.6 0 63 0 11,061 5.33 28.8 0 63 0 10,998 5.30 29.0 0 63 0 10,935 5.27 29.2 0 63 0 10,871 5.24 29.4 0 63 0 10,808 5.21 29.6 0 63 0 10,744 5.18 29.8 0 63 0 10,681 5.15 30.0 0 63 0 10,618 5.12 30.2 0 63 0 10,554 5.09 30.4 0 63 0 10,491 5.06 30.6 0 63 0 10,427 5.03 30.8 0 63 0 10,364 4.99 31.0 0 63 0 10,301 4.96 31.2 0 63 0 10,237 4.93 31.4 0 63 0 10,174 4.90 31.6 0 63 0 10,110 4.87 31.8 0 63 0 10,047 4.84 32.0 0 63 0 9,984 4.81 32.2 0 63 0 9,920 4.78 32.4 0 63 0 9,857 4.75 32.6 0 63 0 9,793 4.72 32.8 0 63 0 9,730 4.69 33.0 0 63 0 9,667 4.66 33.2 0 63 0 9,603 4.63 33.4 0 63 0 9,540 4.60 33.6 0 63 0 9,476 4.57 33.8 0 63 0 9,413 4.54 34.0 0 63 0 9,350 4.51 34.2 0 63 0 9,286 4.48 34.4 0 63 0 9,223 4.44 34.6 0 63 0 9,159 4.41 34.8 0 63 0 9,096 4.38 35.0 0 63 0 9,033 4.35 35.2 0 63 0 8,969 4.32 35.4 0 63 0 8,906 4.29 35.6 0 63 0 8,842 4.26 35.8 0 63 0 8,779 4.23 36.0 0 63 0 8,716 4.20 36.2 0 63 0 8,652 4.17 36.4 0 63 0 8,589 4.14 36.6 0 63 0 8,525 4.11 36.8 0 63 0 8,462 4.08 37.0 0 63 0 8,399 4.05 37.2 0 63 0 8,335 4.02 37.4 0 63 0 8,272 3.99 37.6 0 63 0 8,208 3.96 37.8 0 63 0 8,145 3.93 38.0 0 63 0 8,082 3.89 38.2 0 63 0 8,018 3.86 38.4 0 63 0 7,955 3.83 38.6 0 63 0 7,891 3.80 38.8 0 63 0 7,828 3.77 39.0 0 63 0 7,765 3.74 39.2 0 63 0 7,701 3.71 39.4 0 63 0 7,638 3.68 39.6 0 63 0 7,574 3.65 39.8 0 63 0 7,511 3.62 40.0 0 63 0 7,447 3.59 40.2 0 63 0 7,384 3.56 40.4 0 63 0 7,321 3.53 40.6 0 63 0 7,257 3.50 40.8 0 63 0 7,194 3.47 41.0 0 63 0 7,130 3.44 41.2 0 63 0 7,067 3.41 41.4 0 63 0 7,004 3.38 41.6 0 63 0 6,940 3.34 41.8 0 63 0 6,877 3.31 42.0 0 63 0 6,813 3.28 42.2 0 63 0 6,750 3.25 42.4 0 63 0 6,687 3.22 42.6 0 63 0 6,623 3.19 42.8 0 63 0 6,560 3.16 43.0 0 63 0 6,496 3.13 43.2 0 63 0 6,433 3.10 43.4 0 63 0 6,370 3.07 1082 43.6 0 63 0 6,306 3.04 43.8 0 63 0 6,243 3.01 44.0 0 63 0 6,179 2.98 44.2 0 63 0 6,116 2.95 44.4 0 63 0 6,053 2.92 44.6 0 63 0 5,989 2.89 44.8 0 63 0 5,926 2.86 45.0 0 63 0 5,862 2.83 45.2 0 63 0 5,799 2.79 45.4 0 63 0 5,736 2.76 45.6 0 63 0 5,672 2.73 45.8 0 63 0 5,609 2.70 46.0 0 63 0 5,545 2.67 46.2 0 63 0 5,482 2.64 46.4 0 63 0 5,419 2.61 46.6 0 63 0 5,355 2.58 46.8 0 63 0 5,292 2.55 47.0 0 63 0 5,228 2.52 47.2 0 63 0 5,165 2.49 47.4 0 63 0 5,102 2.46 47.6 0 63 0 5,038 2.43 47.8 0 63 0 4,975 2.40 48.0 0 63 0 4,911 2.37 48.2 0 63 0 4,848 2.34 48.4 0 63 0 4,785 2.31 48.6 0 63 0 4,721 2.28 48.8 0 63 0 4,658 2.24 49.0 0 63 0 4,594 2.21 49.2 0 63 0 4,531 2.18 49.4 0 63 0 4,468 2.15 49.6 0 63 0 4,404 2.12 49.8 0 63 0 4,341 2.09 50.0 0 63 0 4,277 2.06 50.2 0 63 0 4,214 2.03 50.4 0 63 0 4,151 2.00 50.6 0 63 0 4,087 1.97 50.8 0 63 0 4,024 1.94 51.0 0 63 0 3,960 1.91 51.2 0 63 0 3,897 1.88 51.4 0 63 0 3,834 1.85 51.6 0 63 0 3,770 1.82 51.8 0 63 0 3,707 1.79 52.0 0 63 0 3,643 1.76 52.2 0 63 0 3,580 1.73 52.4 0 63 0 3,517 1.69 52.6 0 63 0 3,453 1.66 52.8 0 63 0 3,390 1.63 53.0 0 63 0 3,326 1.60 53.2 0 63 0 3,263 1.57 53.4 0 63 0 3,200 1.54 53.6 0 63 0 3,136 1.51 53.8 0 63 0 3,073 1.48 54.0 0 63 0 3,009 1.45 54.2 0 63 0 2,946 1.42 54.4 0 63 0 2,883 1.39 54.6 0 63 0 2,819 1.36 54.8 0 63 0 2,756 1.33 55.0 0 63 0 2,692 1.30 55.2 0 63 0 2,629 1.27 55.4 0 63 0 2,565 1.24 55.6 0 63 0 2,502 1.21 55.8 0 63 0 2,439 1.18 56.0 0 63 0 2,375 1.14 56.2 0 63 0 2,312 1.11 56.4 0 63 0 2,248 1.08 56.6 0 63 0 2,185 1.05 56.8 0 63 0 2,122 1.02 57.0 0 63 0 2,058 0.99 57.2 0 63 0 1,995 0.96 57.4 0 63 0 1,931 0.93 57.6 0 63 0 1,868 0.90 57.8 0 63 0 1,805 0.87 58.0 0 63 0 1,741 0.84 58.2 0 63 0 1,678 0.81 58.4 0 63 0 1,614 0.78 58.6 0 63 0 1,551 0.75 58.8 0 63 0 1,488 0.72 59.0 0 63 0 1,424 0.69 59.2 0 63 0 1,361 0.66 59.4 0 63 0 1,297 0.63 59.6 0 63 0 1,234 0.59 59.8 0 63 0 1,171 0.56 60.0 0 63 0 1,107 0.53 60.2 0 63 0 1,044 0.50 60.4 0 63 0 980 0.47 60.6 0 63 0 917 0.44 60.8 0 63 0 854 0.41 61.0 0 63 0 790 0.38 61.2 0 63 0 727 0.35 61.4 0 63 0 663 0.32 61.6 0 63 0 600 0.29 1083 61.8 0 63 0 537 0.26 62.0 0 63 0 473 0.23 62.2 0 63 0 410 0.20 62.4 0 63 0 346 0.17 62.6 0 63 0 283 0.14 62.8 0 63 0 220 0.11 63.0 0 63 0 156 0.08 63.2 0 63 0 93 0.04 63.4 0 63 0 29 0.01 63.6 0 29 0 0 0.00 63.8 0 0 0 0 0.00 64.0 0 0 0 0 0.00 64.2 0 0 0 0 0.00 64.4 0 0 0 0 0.00 64.6 0 0 0 0 0.00 64.8 0 0 0 0 0.00 65.0 0 0 0 0 0.00 65.2 0 0 0 0 0.00 65.4 0 0 0 0 0.00 65.6 0 0 0 0 0.00 65.8 0 0 0 0 0.00 66.0 0 0 0 0 0.00 66.2 0 0 0 0 0.00 66.4 0 0 0 0 0.00 66.6 0 0 0 0 0.00 66.8 0 0 0 0 0.00 67.0 0 0 0 0 0.00 67.2 0 0 0 0 0.00 67.4 0 0 0 0 0.00 67.6 0 0 0 0 0.00 67.8 0 0 0 0 0.00 68.0 0 0 0 0 0.00 68.2 0 0 0 0 0.00 68.4 0 0 0 0 0.00 68.6 0 0 0 0 0.00 68.8 0 0 0 0 0.00 69.0 0 0 0 0 0.00 69.2 0 0 0 0 0.00 69.4 0 0 0 0 0.00 69.6 0 0 0 0 0.00 69.8 0 0 0 0 0.00 70.0 0 0 0 0 0.00 70.2 0 0 0 0 0.00 70.4 0 0 0 0 0.00 70.6 0 0 0 0 0.00 70.8 0 0 0 0 0.00 71.0 0 0 0 0 0.00 71.2 0 0 0 0 0.00 71.4 0 0 0 0 0.00 71.6 0 0 0 0 0.00 71.8 0 0 0 0 0.00 72.0 0 0 0 0 0.00 72.2 0 0 0 0 0.00 72.4 0 0 0 0 0.00 72.6 0 0 0 0 0.00 72.8 0 0 0 0 0.00 73.0 0 0 0 0 0.00 73.2 0 0 0 0 0.00 73.4 0 0 0 0 0.00 73.6 0 0 0 0 0.00 73.8 0 0 0 0 0.00 74.0 0 0 0 0 0.00 74.2 0 0 0 0 0.00 74.4 0 0 0 0 0.00 74.6 0 0 0 0 0.00 74.8 0 0 0 0 0.00 75.0 0 0 0 0 0.00 75.2 0 0 0 0 0.00 75.4 0 0 0 0 0.00 75.6 0 0 0 0 0.00 75.8 0 0 0 0 0.00 76.0 0 0 0 0 0.00 76.2 0 0 0 0 0.00 76.4 0 0 0 0 0.00 76.6 0 0 0 0 0.00 76.8 0 0 0 0 0.00 77.0 0 0 0 0 0.00 77.2 0 0 0 0 0.00 77.4 0 0 0 0 0.00 77.6 0 0 0 0 0.00 77.8 0 0 0 0 0.00 78.0 0 0 0 0 0.00 78.2 0 0 0 0 0.00 78.4 0 0 0 0 0.00 78.6 0 0 0 0 0.00 78.8 0 0 0 0 0.00 79.0 0 0 0 0 0.00 79.2 0 0 0 0 0.00 79.4 0 0 0 0 0.00 79.6 0 0 0 0 0.00 79.8 0 0 0 0 0.00 1084 80.0 0 0 0 0 0.00 80.2 0 0 0 0 0.00 80.4 0 0 0 0 0.00 80.6 0 0 0 0 0.00 80.8 0 0 0 0 0.00 81.0 0 0 0 0 0.00 81.2 0 0 0 0 0.00 81.4 0 0 0 0 0.00 81.6 0 0 0 0 0.00 81.8 0 0 0 0 0.00 82.0 0 0 0 0 0.00 82.2 0 0 0 0 0.00 82.4 0 0 0 0 0.00 82.6 0 0 0 0 0.00 82.8 0 0 0 0 0.00 83.0 0 0 0 0 0.00 83.2 0 0 0 0 0.00 83.4 0 0 0 0 0.00 83.6 0 0 0 0 0.00 83.8 0 0 0 0 0.00 84.0 0 0 0 0 0.00 84.2 0 0 0 0 0.00 84.4 0 0 0 0 0.00 84.6 0 0 0 0 0.00 84.8 0 0 0 0 0.00 85.0 0 0 0 0 0.00 85.2 0 0 0 0 0.00 85.4 0 0 0 0 0.00 85.6 0 0 0 0 0.00 85.8 0 0 0 0 0.00 86.0 0 0 0 0 0.00 86.2 0 0 0 0 0.00 86.4 0 0 0 0 0.00 86.6 0 0 0 0 0.00 86.8 0 0 0 0 0.00 87.0 0 0 0 0 0.00 87.2 0 0 0 0 0.00 87.4 0 0 0 0 0.00 87.6 0 0 0 0 0.00 87.8 0 0 0 0 0.00 88.0 0 0 0 0 0.00 88.2 0 0 0 0 0.00 88.4 0 0 0 0 0.00 88.6 0 0 0 0 0.00 88.8 0 0 0 0 0.00 89.0 0 0 0 0 0.00 89.2 0 0 0 0 0.00 89.4 0 0 0 0 0.00 89.6 0 0 0 0 0.00 89.8 0 0 0 0 0.00 90.0 0 0 0 0 0.00 90.2 0 0 0 0 0.00 90.4 0 0 0 0 0.00 90.6 0 0 0 0 0.00 90.8 0 0 0 0 0.00 91.0 0 0 0 0 0.00 91.2 0 0 0 0 0.00 91.4 0 0 0 0 0.00 91.6 0 0 0 0 0.00 91.8 0 0 0 0 0.00 92.0 0 0 0 0 0.00 92.2 0 0 0 0 0.00 92.4 0 0 0 0 0.00 92.6 0 0 0 0 0.00 92.8 0 0 0 0 0.00 93.0 0 0 0 0 0.00 93.2 0 0 0 0 0.00 93.4 0 0 0 0 0.00 93.6 0 0 0 0 0.00 93.8 0 0 0 0 0.00 94.0 0 0 0 0 0.00 94.2 0 0 0 0 0.00 94.4 0 0 0 0 0.00 94.6 0 0 0 0 0.00 94.8 0 0 0 0 0.00 95.0 0 0 0 0 0.00 95.2 0 0 0 0 0.00 95.4 0 0 0 0 0.00 95.6 0 0 0 0 0.00 95.8 0 0 0 0 0.00 96.0 0 0 0 0 0.00 Totals 34,556 20,128 14,428 1085 Contact: Project Name: Company: Location: Phone: Email: Step 9.1 - Volume Required Required storage capacity in cubic feet 13,710 cf (from previous Tab Calculations) Required tank volume at 95% voids: 14,431.58 cf Step 9.2 - Number of Units Required Tank Style Tank Height (in)*Number of Tanks Required Square Footage Required Pent 83.46 675 2,076 *NOTE: Step 9.3 - Configure System Dimensions Enter the limiting dimension to install the system, including required 2-foot perimeter buffer. The worksheet will then show you the width and length in terms of total number of tanks, the footprint of your system, and the footprint of the excavation, assuming a 2-foot perimeter to compact backfill. Limiting Dimension:Width Length available:100 Feet Width available:100 Feet Number of units long: 40 40 Number of units long: 10 10 Number of units wide:17 17 Number of units wide:73 73 Tank Footprint:93.80 Feet Long Tank Footprint:23.45 Feet Long 22.30 Feet Wide 95.75 Feet Wide Excavation Footprint:97.80 Feet Long Excavation Footprint:27.45 Feet Long 26.30 Feet Wide 99.75 Feet Wide Tanks used in selected system: 730 Contact your ACF representative for a list of all the materials you will need to build this system and estimated unit costs for all items to determine an estimate for the total system including installation. Stormwater Management System R-TANK LAYOUT WORKSHEET KMIKAMI@WILSONMIKAMI.COM 949 679-0090 You will typically want the bottom of the system to be above the water table or hard-pan, keeping in mind you need 18 inches of cover above the system. KRISTEN MIKAMI SHADOW RIDGE RESIDENCES Wilson Mikami Corporation PALM DESERT, CA 1086 APPENDIX E UNDERGROUND DETENTION SYSTEM SPECIFICATIONS AND R-TANK DETAILS 1087 1088 1089 1090 1091 1092 1093 1094 1095 1096 2014 Whitewater River Region WQMP Vesting Tentative Tract 38866 Appendix G AGREEMENTS – CC&RS, COVENANT AND AGREEMENTS, BMP MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS AND/OR OTHER MECHANISMS FOR ENSURING ONGOING OPERATION, MAINTENANCE, FUNDING AND TRANSFER OF REQUIREMENTS FOR THIS PROJECT-SPECIFIC WQMP 1097 2014 Whitewater River Region WQMP Vesting Tentative Tract 38866 Appendix H PHASE 1 ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT – SUMMARY OF SITE REMEDIATION CONDUCTED AND USE RESTRICTIONS 1098 2014 Whitewater River Region WQMP Vesting Tentative Tract 38866 Appendix I PROJECT-SPECIFIC WQMP SUMMARY DATA FORM 1099 Project-Specific WQMP Summary Data Form Applicant Information Name and Title Mr. Donald Baarman, Authorized Signatory Company Marriott Ownership Resort, Inc., a Delaware Company Phone (949) 622-8455 Email Project Information Project Name (as shown on project application/project-specific WQMP) Vesting Tentative Tract Map 28818-1 Remainder of Lots 4 and 5 Street Address 9003 Shadow Ridge Road Nearest Cross Streets Portola and Shadow Ridge Road Municipality (City or Unincorporated County) Palm Desert Zip Code 92211 Tract Number(s) and/or Assessor Parcel Number(s) APN 694-290-010 through 011, APN 694-320-010 through 011 Other (other information to help identify location of project) Indicate type of project. Priority Development Projects (Use an "X" in cell preceding project type): SF hillside residence; impervious area ≥ 10,000 sq. ft.; Slope ≥ 25% SF hillside residence; impervious area ≥ 10,000 sq. ft.; Slope ≥ 10% & erosive soils Commercial or Industrial ≥ 100,000 sq. ft. Automotive repair shop Retail Gasoline Outlet disturbing > 5,000 sq. ft. Restaurant disturbing > 5,000 sq. ft. X Home subdivision ≥ 10 housing units Parking lot ≥ 5,000 sq. ft. or ≥ 25 parking spaces Date Project-Specific WQMP Submitted October, 2023 Size of Project Area (nearest 0.1 acre) 20.5 ac Will the project replace more than 50% of the impervious surfaces on an existing developed site? Yes Project Area managed with LID/Site Design BMPs (nearest 0.1 acre) 20.5 ac Are Treatment Control BMPs required? no Is the project subject to onsite retention by ordinance or policy? yes Did the project meet the 100% LID/Site Design Measurable Goal? yes Name of the entity that will implement, operate, and maintain the post-construction BMPs Residences at Shadow Ridge homeowner association Contact Name TBD Street or Mailing Address TBD City TBD Zip Code TBD Phone TBD Space Below for Use by City/County Staff Only Preceding Information Verified by (consistent with information in project-specific WQMP) Name: Date: Date Project-Specific WQMP Approved: Data Entered by Name: Date: Other Comments 1100 City of Palm Desert Shadow Ridge Project, PP 23-0023/VTTM 38866 SECTION 15183 ANALYSIS TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES APPENDIX 7 1101 February 15, 2023 Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines Page 4 of 9 SCOPING AGREEMENT FOR TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY This agreement acknowledges the City of Palm Desert requirements for traffic impact analysis of the following project. The analysis must follow Riverside County Transportation Analysis Guidelines for Level of Service Vehicle Miles Traveled dated December 2020 and subsequent revisions. Case No.: Other Related Cases: Project Name: Assessor’s Parcel Number(s): Project Description: Consultant Developer Name: Address: Telephone: Email: A. Trip Generation Source: (ITE Current Edition) Current GP Land Use: Proposed Land Use: Current Zoning: Proposed Zoning: Current Trip Generation Proposed Trip Generation In Out Total In Out Total AM Trips __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ PM Trips __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ Internal Trip Allowance: ___ Yes ___ No ( % Trip Discount) Pass-by Trip Allowance: ___ Yes ___ No ( % Trip Discount) A pass-by trip discount of 25% is allowed for appropriate land uses. The pass-by trips at adjacent study area intersections and project driveways shall be indicated on a report figure. Additional Information (Include attachments as needed): Tract 28818-1 Shadow Ridge Charlene So, Urban Crossroads, Inc. 1133 Camelback St, #8329, Newport Beach 949-861-0177 cso@urbanxroads.com Eric Everhart, Toll Brothers 350 Commerce, Suite 200, Irvine, CA Resort & Entertainment Planned Residential (PR-5) Resort & Entertainment Planned Residential (PR-5) 17 48 65 55 32 878 X X 93 single family residential dwelling units (currently approved for 324 timeshare units) 1102 February 15, 2023 Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines Page 5 of 9 B. Trip Geographic Distribution: N % S % E % W % (attach exhibit for detailed assignment) C. Background Traffic: Project Build-out Year: Annual Ambient Growth Rate: Phase Year(s): Other area projects to be analyzed: Model/Forecast methodology: D. Study intersections: (NOTE: Subject to revision after other projects, trip generation/distribution are determined, or comments from other agencies. Map is required. In general, the minimum area to be studied shall include any intersection of 2 or more “Collector” or higher classification streets, at which the proposed project will add 50 or more peak hour trips, not exceeding a 5-mile radius from the project site. The Public Works Department may require deviation from these requirements based on the location.) 1. 7. 2. 8. 3. 9. 4. 10. 5. 11. 6. 12. E. Study Roadway Segments: (NOTE: Subject to revision after other projects, trip generation/distribution are determined, or comments from other agencies. Map is required. In general, the minimum area to be studied shall include any intersection of 2 or more “Collector” or higher classification streets, at which the proposed project will add 50 or more peak hour trips, not exceeding a 5-mile radius from the project site. The Public Works Department may require deviation from these requirements based on the location.) 1. 7. 2. 8. 3. 9. 4. 10. 5. 11. 6. 12. F. Other Jurisdictional Impacts: Is this project within a one-mile radius of City boundaries? ___ Yes ___ No If so, name of City jurisdiction: G. Site Plan (Please attach reduced copy) H. Existing Conditions: (Traffic count data must be less than 2 years old. Provide traffic count dates if using other than 2-year-old counts. Unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer, counts shall be performed during 7-9 a.m. and 4-6 p.m., midday when nearby schools". Seasonal peak factor may be required to be applied to counts taken during the offseason in the Coachella Valley.) Date(s) of traffic counts: Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable X Rancho Mirage See attached Not Applicable 1103 February 15, 2023 Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines Page 6 of 9 I. Specific issues to be addressed in the Study (in addition to the standard analysis described in the Guideline) (To be filled out by City) (NOTE: If the traffic study states that “a traffic signal is/appears to be warranted” (or similar statement) at an existing unsignalized other specific items to be addressed under existing conditions, 8-hour approach traffic volume information must be submitted in addition to the peak hourly turning movement counts for that intersection. Specific items to be addressed are warrant analysis, site access, on-site circulation, parking, consistency with plans supporting bicycles, pedestrians, and transit, and others. Attach proposed analysis scenarios (years plus proposed forecasting approach) and attach a proposed phasing approach if the project is phased.) Recommended by: Approved Scoping Agreement: Consultant’s Representative Date Department of Development Services Date Department of Public Works Date Scoping Agreement Submitted on: Revised on: The City of Palm Desert reserves the right to use, share, and reproduce the information including, but not limited to, traffic counts, exhibits, and surveys provided in all submitted traffic studies and VMT assessments. Changes to the scope of work, site occupancy or use, square footage, and/or permitted activities may require a resubmittal or amendment to the scoping agreement. *NOTE* Traffic Study Submittal Form and the appropriate fee must be submitted with, or prior to the submittal of this form. Department of Development Services staff will not process the Scoping Agreement prior to receipt of the fee. 11/22/23 11/22/23 1104 DATE: November 22, 2023 TO: Tom Dodson, Tom Dodson & Associates FROM: Charlene So, Urban Crossroads, Inc. JOB NO: 15742-01 TG Memo SHADOW RIDGE TRIP GENERATION ASSESSMENT Urban Crossroads, Inc. is pleased to provide the following Trip Generation Assessment for the Shadow Ridge development (Project), which is located at 9003 Shadow Ridge Road which is east of Monterey Avenue and north of Frank Sinatra Drive in the City of Palm Desert. This trip letter describes the proposed Project trip generation and determines whether any additional traffic operations analysis is required. PROPOSED PROJECT The Project is the remaining Parcel 4 and Parcel 5 of Tract 28818-1 on the Shadow Ridge Golf Course. It is our understanding that the Project consists of 93 single family detached residential dwelling units. The site was previously evaluated in the Marriott’s Desert Springs Villas Traffic Impact Analysis (prepared by Nickerson, Diercks & Associates, dated May 14, 1998, referred to as 1998 Traffic Study). The 1998 Traffic Study evaluated 324 timeshare units, which Marriott no longer intends to develop due to the existing inventory levels and reduced demand. A preliminary site plan for the proposed Project is shown on Exhibit 1. As indicated on Exhibit 1, access to the site will be accommodated via the existing Shadow Ridge Road to Gerald Ford Drive to the north and to Monterey Avenue to the west. 1105 Tom Dodson, Tom Dodson & Associates November 22, 2023 Page 2 of 4 15742-01 TG Memo EXHIBIT 1: PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN 1106 Tom Dodson, Tom Dodson & Associates November 22, 2023 Page 3 of 4 15742-01 TG Memo TRIP GENERATION Trip generation represents the amount of traffic which is both attracted to and produced by a development. Determining traffic generation for a specific project is therefore based upon forecasting the amount of traffic that is expected to be both attracted to and produced by the specific land uses being proposed for a given development. The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual (11th Edition, 2021) has been utilized to calculate the trip generation for both the approved land use and proposed Project for the purposes of this trip generation assessment. APPROVED PROJECT As noted previously, the 1998 Traffic Study evaluated 324 timeshare units, which Marriott no longer intends to develop due to the existing inventory levels and reduced demand. The trip generation rates used for the approved Project are based upon the ITE Trip Generation Manual and are shown on Table 1. The trip generation summary illustrating daily, and peak hour trip generation estimates for the approved Project is shown on Table 1. As shown in Table 1, the approved Project was anticipated to generate a total of 2,796 two-way trips per day with 130 AM peak hour trips and 204 PM peak hour trips. TABLE 1: APPROVED PROJECT TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY PROPOSED PROJECT The proposed Project includes the development of 93 single family detached residential dwelling units. The trip generation rates used for the proposed Project are based upon the ITE Trip Generation Manual and are shown on Table 2. The trip generation summary illustrating daily, and peak hour trip generation estimates for the proposed Project is shown on Table 2. As shown in Table 2, the Project is anticipated to generate a total of 878 two-way trips per day with 65 AM peak hour trips and 87 PM peak hour trips. ITE Land Use Code Units1 In Out Total In Out Total Daily Timeshare 265 DU 0.24 0.16 0.40 0.25 0.38 0.63 8.63 Land Use Quantity Units1 In Out Total In Out Total Daily Approved Project 324 DU 78 52 130 82 122 204 2,796 Source: Trip Generation Manual, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 11th Edition, 2021. 1 DU = Dwelling Units AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour 1107 Tom Dodson, Tom Dodson & Associates November 22, 2023 Page 4 of 4 15742-01 TG Memo TABLE 2: PROJECT TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY TRIP GENERATION COMPARISON Table 3 provides a comparison of the proposed Project (single family detached residential) trip generation to the Approved Project (timeshare). As shown on Table 3, the proposed Project is anticipated to result in a net reduction of 1,918 two-way trips per day with 65 fewer AM peak hour trips and 117 fewer PM peak hour trips. TABLE 3: TRIP GENERATION COMPARISON FINDINGS The City of Palm Desert adheres to the County’s Transportation Analysis Guidelines for Level of Service and Vehicle Miles Traveled (dated December 2020) which has been used to determine whether additional traffic analysis is necessary for the proposed Project. The County’s Guidelines indicate that development projects that generate a net increase of 100 or more peak hour vehicle trips would require the preparation and submittal of a Level of Service (LOS) based Traffic Study. The Project on its own, without taking any credit for existing uses, generates fewer than 100 peak hour trips. The Project is also anticipated to contribute fewer than 50 peak hour trips during the morning and evening peak hours to any off-site intersection. Lastly, the development of the proposed Project results in a net reduction in trips as compared to the Approved Project. As such, additional peak hour traffic operations analysis is not necessary based on the County’s Guidelines. If you have any questions or comments, I can be reached at cso@urbanxroads.com. ITE Land Use Code Units1 In Out Total In Out Total Daily Single Family Detached Residential 210 DU 0.18 0.52 0.70 0.59 0.35 0.94 9.43 Land Use Quantity Units1 In Out Total In Out Total Daily Shadow Ridge Residential 93 DU 17 48 65 55 32 87 878 Source: Trip Generation Manual, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 11th Edition, 2021. 1 DU = Dwelling Units AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Trip Generation Comparison In Out Total In Out Total Daily Approved Project: Timeshare 78 52 130 82 122 204 2,796 Proposed Project: Single Family Residential 17 48 65 55 32 87 878 Net Change in Trips -61 -4 -65 -27 -90 -117 -1,918 Note: Negative trips reflects net reduction in trips from the Approved Project. AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour 1108 City of Palm Desert Shadow Ridge Project, PP 23-0023/VTTM 38866 SECTION 15183 ANALYSIS TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES APPENDIX 8 1109 DATE: November 21, 2023 TO: Tom Dodson, Tom Dodson & Associates FROM: Alex So, Urban Crossroads, Inc. JOB NO: 15742-01 VMT SHADOW RIDGE VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED (VMT) SCREENING EVALUATION Urban Crossroads, Inc. is pleased to provide the following Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Screening Evaluation for the Shadow Ridge (Project), which is located 9003 Shadow Ridge Road in the City of Palm Desert. PROJECT OVERVIEW It is our understanding that the project consists of 93 single family detached lots on the remaining Parcel 4 and 5 of Tract 28818-1 on Shadow Ridge Golf Course. BACKGROUND The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires all lead agencies to adopt VMT as the measure for identifying transportation impacts for land use projects. The City of Palm Desert does not have their own adopted VMT guidelines. City Staff recommends using the Riverside County Transportation Analysis Guidelines for Level of Service Vehicle Miles Traveled (December 2020) (County Guidelines) (1), which documents analytical procedures, screening tools, and impact thresholds for VMT. The County Guidelines were used to prepare this VMT screening evaluation. VMT SCREENING Consistent with County Guidelines, projects should evaluate available screening criteria based on their location and project type to determine if a presumption of a less than significant transportation impact can be made. The following screening criteria are listed in the County Guidelines, and those applicable to the proposed Project (highlighted in bold) were selected for further review: 1110 Tom Dodson, Tom Dodson & Associates November 21, 2023 Page 2 of 3 15742-01 VMT • Small Projects • High Quality Transit Areas (HQTA) • Local Serving Retail (not applicable) • Affordable Housing • Local Essential Service (not applicable) • Map-Based Screening SMALL PROJECTS SCREENING The County Guidelines list two types of screening criteria that may apply to “small projects.” The first is a vehicle trip threshold of 110 trips per day. Trips anticipated to be generated by the Project are estimated based on trip generation rates collected by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition, 2021(3). The Project is anticipated to generate 878 vehicle trip-ends (i.e., includes both inbound and outbound trips) per day that would exceed the 110 daily trip threshold (See Attachment A). Additionally, the County Guidelines also identifies land use projects that are forecasted to generate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions below 3,000 Metric Tons of Carbon Dioxide Equivalent (MTCO2e) per year, which are also estimated to cause a less than significant VMT impact.1 The County Guidelines provides a table for several different land use development types and their CO2e per year emission rates. Based on the County Guidelines 110 single family dwelling units would be equivalent to the 3,000 MTCO2e threshold. Therefore, the Project with its intended development 93 dwelling units would not exceed the 3,000 MTCO2e threshold. Small Projects screening criteria is met. HIGH QUALITY TRANSIT AREAS (HQTA) SCREENING Projects located within a Transit Priority Area (TPA) (i.e., within ½ mile of an existing “major transit stop”2 or an existing stop along a “high-quality transit corridor”3) may be presumed to have a less than significant impact, absent substantial evidence to the contrary. However, the presumption may not be appropriate if a project: • Has a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of less than 0.75. • Includes more parking for use by residents, customers, or employees of the project than required by the jurisdiction (if the jurisdiction requires the project to supply parking). • Is inconsistent with the applicable Sustainable Communities Strategy (as determined by the lead agency, with input from the Metropolitan Planning Organization); or • Replaces affordable residential units with a smaller number of moderate- or high-income residential units. 1 County Guidelines; Page 19. 2 Pub. Resources Code, § 21064.3 (“‘Major transit stop’ means a site containing an existing rail transit station, a ferry terminal served by either a bus or rail transit service, or the intersection of two or more major bus routes with a frequency of service interval of 15 minutes or less during the morning and afternoon peak commute periods.”). 3 Pub. Resources Code, § 21155 (“For purposes of this section, a high-quality transit corridor means a corridor with fixed route bus service with service intervals no longer than 15 minutes during peak commute hours.”). 1111 Tom Dodson, Tom Dodson & Associates November 21, 2023 Page 3 of 3 15742-01 VMT The Project does not intend to develop a FAR of greater than 0.75 to meet the secondary criteria. Therefore, irrespective of the Project’s location to any HQTA, the Project would not qualify for this screening criteria. HQTA screening criteria is not met. AFFORDABLE HOUSING Projects consisting of a high percentage of affordable housing as determined by the Riverside County Planning and Transportation Departments are presumed to have a less than significant impact on VMT as lower-income residents make fewer trips on average. The Project does not intend to develop any deed-restricted income-qualified dwelling units. Affordable Housing screening criteria is not met. MAP-BASED SCREENING County Guidelines note that “residential and office projects that locate in areas with low VMT, and that incorporate similar features (i.e., density, mix of uses, transit accessibility), will tend to exhibit similarly low VMT.” Urban Crossroads has obtained a VMT data table from County Staff for all traffic analysis zones (TAZ) within Riverside County that provides VMT per capita and VMT per employee for the purposes of identifying low VMT areas. The data utilizes the sub-regional Riverside Transportation Analysis Model (RIVTAM) to measure baseline VMT performance for individual TAZ’s and a comparison was made to the applicable impact threshold (e.g., VMT per employee for office or industrial land uses and VMT per capita for residential land uses). Utilizing the RIVTAM Model the TAZ of the Project was identified. The Project resides in TAZ 4672, which is shown to generate 13.6 VMT per capita. The County threshold as identified in the County Guidelines is 15.2 VMT per capita. As such, the Project’s TAZ is located in a low VMT area. Map-Based screening criteria is met. CONCLUSION In summary, the Project meets the Small Project and the Map-Based screening criteria and is therefore determined to have a less than significant VMT impact; no additional VMT analysis is required. If you have any questions, please contact me directly at aso@urbanxroads.com. 1112 15742-01 VMT REFERENCES 1. County of Riverside. Transportation Analysis Guidelines for Level of Service Vehicle Miles Traveled. County of Riverside : s.n., December 2020. 1113 15742-01 VMT ATTACHMENT A PROJECT TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY 1114 15742-01 VMT TABLE A-1: PROJECT TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY ITE Land Use Code Units1 In Out Total In Out Total Daily Single Family Detached Residential 210 DU 0.18 0.52 0.70 0.59 0.35 0.94 9.43 Land Use Quantity Units1 In Out Total In Out Total Daily Shadow Ridge Residential 93 DU 17 48 65 55 32 87 878 Source: Trip Generation Manual, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 11th Edition, 2021. 1 DU = Dwelling Units AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour 1115 1116 SHADOW RIDGE Palm Desert - Planning Commission Meeting June 18, 2024 1117 Toll Brothers is an award-winning Fortune 500 company. As America’s luxury home builder, we build more than homes, we build lasting communities. Trusted since 1967, Toll Brothers embraces an unwavering commitment to quality and customer service. Each Toll Brothers home blends quality materials with superior design to create a dream home that is uniquely the homeowners. 1118 Your Dream Home within a Golf Course Resort SHADOW RIDGE 1119 Shadow Ridge The Site 1120 1121 Gated & Private Luxury Living Shadow Ridge A Residential Community1122 Shadow Ridge Desert Lifestyle Lifestyle Residences Within a Renown Resort 1123 SHADOW RIDGE Timeless Architecture…Quite Luxury Shadow Ridge Architecture 1124 Shadow Ridge Architecture 1125 Shadow Ridge Architecture 1126 Floor PlansShadow Ridge Floor PlansComposite Floor Plans 1127 Shadow Ridge LandscapeLush & Colorful Native Landscape 1128 Shadow Ridge LandscapeNative Landscape / Attention to Detail 1129 Shadow Ridge LandscapeColorful Assortment of Native Landscape 1130 SHADOW RIDGE Peaceful Community Park1131 SHADOW RIDGE Your Golf Course Resort Home1132 Thank you! SHADOW RIDGE 1133 1134 VTTM 38866 and PP23-0023 Toll Brothers –Shadow Ridge PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 18, 2024 6/18/2024 AGENDA ITEM 8.B 1 1135 Project Request Case Nos.: Vesting Tentative Tract Map (VTTM) 38866 (TTM23-0005) & Precise Plan (PP) 23-0023 Project Applicant: Toll Brothers Consideration: Approval Project Description: A residential subdivision within the Marriott Shadow Ridge development located east of Monterey Avenue on Shadow Ridge Road. The project proposes to subdivide a vacant 20.69-acre property within Marriott Shadow Ridge into 93 single-family residential lots, with gated private streets and private community open space. Related Cases: PP/CUP 98-5 Amendment #2 AGENDA ITEM 8.B6/18/2024 2 1136 Project Site Description General Plan Land Use Designation: Resort and Entertainment District (RED) Zoning Designation: Planned Residential – 5 Dwelling Units Per Acre (PR-5) Existing Land Use: Vacant, Timeshare, Golf-course Proposed Use: Single-family – Permitted AGENDA ITEM 8.B6/18/2024 3 Surrounding Area Existing Uses General Plan Zoning North Commercial Retail/Single Family Regional Retail Center/Town Center Neighborhood (TCN) District Planned Commercial (PC-2)/PR South Mobile Home Park Golf Course Resort Neighborhood (GCRN)PR-5 East Vacant TCN Refuge Specific Plan West Vacant – Approved Mixed Use (Cotino) City of Rancho Mirage (Mixed-Use) City of Rancho Mirage Section 31 Specific Plan 1137 Vicinity Map AGENDA ITEM 8.B6/18/2024 4 1138 AGENDA ITEM 8.B6/18/2024 5 1139 Background – Development Agreement Existing Development Agreement 98-1 in Place since 1998 for approval of a 999 unit timeshare development and 18-hole golf course on the site. On January 25, 2024, the City Council adopted a Second Amendment to the DA to establish termination provisions for the DA on the project site. AGENDA ITEM 8.B6/18/2024 6 1140 Background – Architectural Review Commission ARC Approval on May 14, 2024 1.Columns shown on rear porches shall be based off the originally proposed “L” shape and shall be squared off to create a larger mass. 2.Entry wall pilasters shall have stone veneer reverted to precision block or alternate material. Condition #1 to be addressed on final plans Condition #2 incorporated into approved plans AGENDA ITEM 8.B6/18/2024 7 1141 Project Description •Three residential plan types. •Two architectural treatments per plan. •Options on floor plans. •Project specific development standards. AGENDA ITEM 8.B6/18/2024 8 Lot Description Proposed Land Use Approximate Area Lots 1 – 93 Residential 15.75-acres Lots “A” – “F” Private Street and Motor Court 3.36-acres Lots “G” – “L” Landscape and Open Space 1.24-acres Lot “M” Master Association Dedication 0.10-acres Development Standard Minimum Proposed Requirement Lot Standards Minimum Lot Area (Square-Feet) 5,500 SF Minimum Lot Width (Feet) 50’-0” Minimum Lot Depth (Feet) 110’-0” Building Standards Front Yard – Living Area (Feet) 10’-0” Front Yard – Garage (Feet) 18’-0” Side Yard - Interior and Street (Feet) 5’-0” Rear Yard (Feet) 10’-0” Maximum Building Height (Feet) 15’-1” Maximum Lot Coverage (Percentage) 52% and 60% 1142 AGENDA ITEM 8.B6/18/2024 9 N 1143 AGENDA ITEM 8.B6/18/2024 10 1144 6/18/2024 AGENDA ITEM 8.B 11 1145 4/9/2024 AGENDA ITEM 6.A.6 12 1146 4/9/2024 AGENDA ITEM 6.A.6 13 1147 4/9/2024 AGENDA ITEM 6.A.6 14 1148 4/9/2024 AGENDA ITEM 6.A.6 15 1149 4/9/2024 AGENDA ITEM 6.A.6 16 1150 4/9/2024 AGENDA ITEM 6.A.6 17 1151 Analysis Project Complies with applicable development standards AGENDA ITEM 8.B6/18/2024 18 STANDARD PR-5 PROJECT CONFORMS General Requirements Density 5 Dwelling Units Per Acre 4.49-Dwellings Units Per Acre Yes Minimum Project Area 5 acres 20.69-acres Yes Minimum Common Open Space 30% of the net area (5 acres) 7% of the net area (1.24 acres)Exception Allowable1 Maximum Height 40’-0”15’-1” Max Yes Maximum No. of Stories 3 Stories 1 story Yes Parking 2 covered spaces per dwelling 2 covered spaces per dwelling + street parking Yes Proposed Standards Front Yard Setback -10’-0” Living Area 18’-0” Garage Yes Side Yard Setback -5’-0”Yes Street Side Yard Setback -5’-0”N/A Rear Yard Setback -10’-0”Yes Lot Coverage Percentage 50%52%Exception Allowable2 1152 Public Hearing Notices sent to all property owners within 1,000’ of the site. No comments in favor or opposition to the project. AGENDA ITEM 8.B6/18/2024 19 1153 CEQA Project is exempt from further review pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 Project is consistent with the Palm Desert General Plan and Zoning Initial Study prepared which examined the project. AGENDA ITEM 8.B6/18/2024 20 1154 Recommendation #1 AGENDA ITEM 8.B6/18/2024 21 1.Adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 2873 entitled, “A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 38866 TO SUBDIVIDE APPROXIMATELY 20.69- ACRES INTO 93 NUMBERED LOTS, AND 13 LETTERED LOTS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY WITH PRIVATE OPEN SPACE, LANDSCAPE AND VEHICULAR ACCESS LOCATED ON SHADOW RIDGE ROAD GENERALLY SOUTH OF GERALD FORD DRIVE AND EAST OF MONTEREY AVENUE AND FINDING THE PROJECT IS EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA).” CASE NO. VTTM 38866 (TTM23-0005) With Amended Condition 1155 Recommendation #1 AGENDA ITEM 8.B6/18/2024 22 Amend Condition #20 In order to maintain certain services provided by the City of Palm Desert, which are impacted by the proposed development, including, but not limited to, police services, fire and ambulance and emergency response services, parks and open space maintenance, lighting and landscape maintenance, administrative fees of the City and any other services permitted under the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended, commencing with Section 53311 of the Government Code (“Act”) as well as costs of administration, operating, and reporting, the Developer shall initiate the formation of a community facilities district for services pursuant to the Act by submitting a petition in the form specified by the City, and City and Developer shall coordinate to complete the formation process prior to or concurrent with building permit issuance. The special taxes authorized to be levied within the community facilities district shall be levied in accordance with the Rate and Method of Apportionment of Special Tax (“RMA”) attached hereto as Schedule 1. In no event shall the initial Maximum Special Tax for each Assessor’s Parcel of Developed Property in its Base Year exceed $2,200 or increase in subsequent Fiscal Years following the Base Year by more than the Annual Escalation Factor. All capitalized terms used in the preceding sentence shall have the meanings ascribed thereto in the RMA. This condition is subject to confirmation with the City Council. 1156 Recommendation #1 AGENDA ITEM 8.B6/18/2024 23 Amend Condition #14 Development Standard Requirement Lot Standards Minimum Lot Area (Square-Feet)5,500 SF Minimum Lot Width (Feet)50’-0” Minimum Lot Depth (Feet)110’-0” Building Standards Minimum Front Yard – Living Area (Feet)10’-0” Minimum Front Yard – Garage (Feet)18’-0” Minimum Side Yard - Interior and Street (Feet)5’-0” Minimum Rear Yard (Feet)10’-0” Maximum Building Height (Feet)18’-0” Maximum Lot Coverage (Percentage)52% and 60%* • The lot and development standards of VTTM 38866 shall be as follows in the table below: •60% lot coverage on lot #1-4, 7-15, 30 and 32-39 1157 Recommendation #2 AGENDA ITEM 8.B6/18/2024 24 2. Adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 2874 entitled, “A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PRECISE PLAN FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 93 UNIT SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION LOCATED ON SHADOW RIDGE ROAD WITHIN THE EXISTING MARRIOTT SHADOW RIDGE DEVELOPMENT, AND FINDING THAT THE PROJECT IS EXEMPT FROM FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT.” CASE NO. PP23-0023 With Amended Conditions 1158 Recommendation #2 AGENDA ITEM 8.B6/18/2024 25 Amend Condition #31 Development Standard Requirement Lot Standards Minimum Lot Area (Square-Feet)5,500 SF Minimum Lot Width (Feet)50’-0” Minimum Lot Depth (Feet)110’-0” Building Standards Minimum Front Yard – Living Area (Feet)10’-0” Minimum Front Yard – Garage (Feet)18’-0” Minimum Side Yard - Interior and Street (Feet)5’-0” Minimum Rear Yard (Feet)10’-0” Maximum Building Height (Feet)18’-0” Maximum Lot Coverage (Percentage)52% and 60%* • The lot and development standards of VTTM 38866 shall be as follows in the table below: •60% lot coverage on lot #1-4, 7-15, 30 and 32-39 1159 1160 Page 1 of 6 CITY OF PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MEETING DATE: June 18, 2024 PREPARED BY: Carlos Flores, AICP, Principal Planner REQUEST: CONSIDER ADOPTING A NOTICE OF EXEMPTION AND APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR AN OUTDOOR PATIO FOR DINING PURPOSES FOR AN EXISTING RESTAURANT AT 72990 EL PASEO, SUITE 3 RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 287 5 entitled, “A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A NOTICE OF EXEMPTION PURSUANT TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) AND APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) FOR AN OUTDOOR PATIO FOR DINING PURPOSES FOR AN EXISTING RESTAURANT AT 72990 EL PASEO, SUITE 3” BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The proposal is a request by Charissa Farley-Hay (Applicant), for consideration of a Design Review to approve architecture and landscaping for an outdoor patio remodel for “Wildest Restaurant” (Restaurant), located at 72990 El Paseo, Suite #3 (Assessor’s Parcel Number: 640170013), within the Palms to Pines West Shopping Center. The Restaurant occupies the south end of an in-line commercial building (Building) within the Palms to Pines West Shopping Center (Center). The Building has two (2) other commercial tenants and shares parking with four (4) surrounding multi-tenant commercial buildings within the Center. The Restaurant currently utilizes existing parking spaces fo r a temporary outdoor dining area and seeks approval to have a permanent outdoor patio dining area. The proposed project will remove five (5) existing parking spaces and add five (5) new parking spaces, resulting in no net less to parking. The total parking required for the Center is 184 spaces based off uses, including 18 spaces required for this Project. The Center was approved for a total of 27,021 square feet (sf) of retail/bank building and 10,548 sf of restaurant building with and has a total of 166 on-site parking spaces and 18 on-street parking spaces adjacent to the Center. Sheet A- 1.20 of Attachment 3 (Project Plans) provides a parking count with information on how parking is proposed to be shared within the Center. The Architectural Review Commission (ARC) of the City of Palm Desert considered the request and took the following action at its meeting of May 28, 2024: 1161 City of Palm Desert – Planning Commission CUP23-0015 Wildest Restaurant Outdoor Patio Page 2 of 6 Following discussion, MOTION BY CHAIR VUKSIC, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER MCAULIFFE, CARRIED 6-0 (VICE CHAIR MCINTOSH ABSENT); the ARC approved Case No. Design Review 23-0015 with the following conditions: 1. Roll up door shall be further studied and reviewed by staff regarding its maintainability or be replaced with swinging metal doors. 2. A pilaster with the same stone cladding on the building shall be added to the opening at the northeast corner of the patio. 3. Gravel placed in planters adjacent to the parking lot shall match existing parking lot gravel. 4. Shipping container shall be new or like-new condition. All of these conditions have been added as condition s of approval in the draft Resolution No. 2874. Project Description: A. Property Description: The project site is a 1.12-acre parcel within the Center. The Restaurant is located on the south end of the Building, as shown on Exhibit 1. Exhibit 1 – Restaurant Site Plan 1162 City of Palm Desert – Planning Commission CUP23-0015 Wildest Restaurant Outdoor Patio Page 3 of 6 B. Zoning, General Plan, and Adjacent Uses Table 1 – Adjacent Land Use and Designations Existing Uses General Plan Zoning Project Site Existing Commercial Regional Retail Planned Commercial – 3 (P.C.-3), S.P. North Existing Commercial Regional Retail Planned Commercial – 3 (P.C.-3), S.P. South Existing Residential Small Town Neighborhood Planned Residential – 6 (PR-6) East Existing Commercial Regional Retail Planned Commercial – 3 (P.C.-3), S.P. West Existing Commercial Regional Retail Planned Commercial – 3 (P.C.-3), S.P. C. Project Description The Applicant is requesting Design Review approval for a 2,977 square foot (sf) outdoor permanent dining patio which would include: a pergola/trellis, 8’ x 40’ storage container, fireplace, heaters, lighting, pavers, wall, and landscaping on the perimeter and interior of the patio. The total usable area for patio dining purposes would be 2,233 square feet. Architecture The proposal includes construction and installation of a 20’ x 40’ trellis, an 8’ x 40’ container, perimeter walls, and furniture within the patio, including tables, chairs, and a fireplace. Attachment 3 provides details on the proposed architecture of the expansion, which serves to expand the existing Restaurant, and can be summarized below: - Pergola: the Pergola is 10’ in height, 20’ in depth, and 40’ in length. It will be constructed of aluminum painted white installed with six (6) posts and include ceiling fans and heaters, downlights, and be used for dining. The posts will be cladded with stone veneer at a total height of 2’-4” on the post, to match existing building and wood molding. - Container: A container measuring 8’ in height, 8’ in depth, and 40’ in length will be located on the western part of the outdoor patio. The container will be galvanized steel painted white, have a vinyl print design wrapped around it, and include a mounted herb garden wall. The container will include a window, roller doors, and be used for Restaurant storage. - Block wall: A 40” high retaining wall to be constructed of grey and black precision block. The wall will use the combination of colors, offsetting colors by row. - Pavers: The patio will include pavers in graphite, foundry, and linen colors. 1163 City of Palm Desert – Planning Commission CUP23-0015 Wildest Restaurant Outdoor Patio Page 4 of 6 Exhibit 2 - Renderings Landscaping The proposal includes landscaping on the perimeter, interior, and adjacent parking stalls, as shown in exhibit 3. The landscaping palette plan includes trees (pygmy date palms, palo verdes, palo blancos, and laurel figs), shrubs and accents, “Pink Powderpuff” vines, and green car pet natal plum ground cover. Exhibit 3 – Landscaping Plan 1164 City of Palm Desert – Planning Commission CUP23-0015 Wildest Restaurant Outdoor Patio Page 5 of 6 Public Notice: Public Notification Public noticing was conducted for this Planning Commission meeting per the requirements of the Palm Desert Municipal Code (PDMC). A public hearing notice was published a minimum of 10 days before the hearing date on Friday, June 7, 2024, in The Desert Sun newspaper. Notices were mailed to all property owners within 300 feet of the project site. No comments have been received to date. Environmental Assessment/Environmental Review: The application has complied with the requirements of the “City of Palm Desert Procedure for Implementation of CEQA” Resolution No. 2019 -41, in that the Planning Commission finds that the Project is exempt from CEQA per Section 15301 of the State CEQA guid elines as the Project is an Article 19, Section 15301 Existing Facilities (Class 1) project. Class 1 consists of the operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, or minor alteration of existing public or private structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, or topographical features, involving negligible or no expansion of existing or former use. The expansion is in an area where all public services and facilities are available to allow for maximum development permissible in the General Plan and in an area that is not environmentally sensitive. Additionally, the Project is not subject to any of the exceptions for categorical exemptions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2: 1) The Project qualifies as a Class 1 exemption, which is not listed as one of the classes under 15300.2 (A). The Project is not located on a site where it may have an adverse impact on an environmental resource of hazardous or critical concern where designated, precisely mapped, and officially adopted pursuant to law by federal, state, or local agencies. The Project site will not impact designated environmental or biological resources as it is not located within a conservation area as identified by the (MSHCP). 2) The Project will not have a cumulative impact on the environment. There are no other or previous projects that have occurred in succession in the same place, of the same type, to include a cumulative impact. 3) There are no unusual circumstances identified in relation to the proposed use or Projec t site which would result in a significant impact on the environment. The Project site is not located within a flood zone per the latest FEMA Flood Zone Maps. The Project site is located within a Very High area per Fire Hazard Severity Zone maps depicted in Figure 8.5 on Page 119 of the General Plan. The nearest fire station is located less than ½ mile east of the Project site. The Project site is not identified within an Alquist -Priolo Fault Zone per the latest maps on file with the California Department of Conservation; the nearest fault zone is the San Andreas Fault located north of the Palm Desert City Limits. 4) The Project site is located within 300 feet of Highway 74, which is a State Scenic Highway. The project, as condition, will not result in any damage to this scenic resource. The project is proposing an outdoor dining patio with construction limited to an attached trellis, walls, storage, 1165 City of Palm Desert – Planning Commission CUP23-0015 Wildest Restaurant Outdoor Patio Page 6 of 6 and landscaping. The project meets all development standards of the underlying zone and is not proposing a structure height above existing buildings. This proposal is for use of an outdoor area for dining purposes and does not propose any construction that would cause damage to Highway 74. The applicant utilizes landscaping throughout the project site to beautif y the area. 5) Hazardous Waste Site: The Project site has not been identified as a hazardous waste site per maps and databases provided by the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC). 6) The Project site does not contain any structure or title that would designate it as a historical resource. Therefore, the Project will not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource. Findings of Approval: Findings of Approval can be found in draft Resolution No. 2875 (Attachment 1) ATTACHMENTS: 1. Draft Resolution No. 2875 2. Architectural Review Commission Notice of Action 3. Project Plans 4. Public Hearing Notice 5. Draft Notice of Exemption 1166 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2875 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A NOTICE OF EXEMPTION PURSUANT TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) AND APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) FOR AN OUTDOOR PATIO FOR DINING PURPOSES FOR AN EXISTING RESTAURANT AT 72990 EL PASEO, SUITE 3 CASE NO. CUP23-0015 WHEREAS, Charissa Farley-Hay (“Applicant”), submitted a CUP application to construct an outdoor patio for dining purposes at an existing restaurant (Wildest Restaurant) at 72990 El Paseo, Suite 3 (APN 640-170-013) within the Palms to Pines West Shopping Center (“Project”); and WHEREAS, the Project site is currently within the Planned Commercial (PC-3), Scenic Preservation zoning designation and is designated Regional Retail by the Palm Desert General Plan; and WHEREAS, the proposed Project conforms to the General Plan land use designation of Regional Retail and development standards listed in the City’s Zoning Ordinance for the PC-3 zoning district; and WHEREAS, under Section 21067 of the Public Resources Code, Section 15367 of the State CEQA Guidelines (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 14, § 15000 et seq.), and the City of Palm Desert’s (“City’s”) Local CEQA Guidelines, the City is the lead agency for the Project; and WHEREAS, the Project has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedure for Implem entation of CEQA” Resolution No. 2019-41, in that the Director of Development Services has determined that the Project will not have a foreseeable significant impact on the environment and that the Project is eligible for an exemption pursuant to Article 19, Section 15301 Existing Facilities (Class 1); therefore, no further environmental review is necessary at this time; and WHEREAS, the Architectural Review Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 28th day of May 2024, provide Design Review approval of said project, subject to conditions of approval which have been included in this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 18th day of June 2024, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider the request by the Applicant for approval of the above-noted Project request; and WHEREAS, at the said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, the Planning Commission did find the following facts and reasons, which are outlined in the staff report, exist to justify approval of said request: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1167 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2875 2 SECTION 1. Recitals. The Planning Commission hereby finds that the foregoing recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein as substantive findings of this Resolution. SECTION 2. Findings on Conditional Use Permit. Under PDMC Section 25.72.050(F), the findings for the CUP are the following: 1. The proposed location of the conditional use is in accord with the objectives of this title and the purpose of the district in which the site is located. The location of the conditional use is an outdoor expansion area for an existing suite and building that was constructed to meet all applicable standards of the PC- 3 district. All objectives of the title and purposes of the PC-3 district are being met with this CUP as there are no changes to the building itself. The PC-3 district allows for restaurant uses, as is proposed in this project. The project, as conditioned, is designed to meet the purpose of the district in which the site is located. 2. The proposed location of the conditional use and the conditions under which it would be operated or maintained will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or be materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The Project is located in the exterior of an existing commercial building with sufficient parking. Although the project is removing some parking spaces, the applicant has provided documentation on shared parking throughout the site to make up for the loss of parking stalls. The site has been previously designed to meet access, utilities, setbacks, lot coverage, building height, land use, and parking requirements for nonresidential uses. The proposed Project does not pose a conflict regarding land use and can be conditioned to not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or be materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. The proposed conditional use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of this title, except for approved variances or adjustments. The location of the conditional use is an exterior area adjacent to an existing suite that was constructed to meet all applicable standards of the PC-3 district. All objectives of the title and purposes of the PC-3 district are being met with this CUP as there are no changes to the building or site itself. The PC-3 district allows for restaurant uses, as is proposed in this project. The project, as conditioned, is designed to meet the purpose of the district in which the site is located. 4. The proposed conditional use complies with the goals, objectives, and policies of the City’s General Plan The subject property is designated Regional Retail per the General Plan Land Use Element. The Regional Retail land use designation allows restaurant and commercial uses and its intent and purpose is to “provide large-format retail development along with associated restaurant and commercial service activity”. The proposed use is the expansion of an existing and operational restaurant. The 1168 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2875 3 property does not have any applicable specific plans or any other City regulations/standards. Specifically, the following General Plan Goals and policies are being met: Land Use Goal 8 – Economic Development. A diverse, growing, and resilient local economy. Land Use Policy 3.14 – The project would continue to provide access for residents to an existing restaurant and enhance the restaurant. Land Use Policy 4.3 – The project would allow for a wide variety of uses to locate in a Regional Retail district. SECTION 3. CEQA. The application has complied with the requirements of the “City of Palm Desert Procedure for Implementation of CEQA” Resolution No. 2019-41, in that the Planning Commission finds that the Project is exempt from CEQA per Section 15301 of the State CEQA guidelines as the Project is an Article 19, Section 15301 Existing Facilities (Class 1) project. Class 1 consists of the operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, or minor alteration of existing public or private structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, or topographical features, involving negligible or no expansion of existing or former use. The expansion is in an area where all public services and facilities are available to allow for maximum development permissible in the General Plan and in an area that is not environmentally sensitive. Additionally, the Project is not subject to any of the exceptions for categorical exempti ons identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2: 1) The Project qualifies as a Class 1 exemption, which is not listed as one of the classes under 15300.2 (A). The Project is not located on a site where it may have an adverse impact on an environmental resource of hazardous or critical concern where designated, precisely mapped, and officially adopted pursuant to law by federal, state, or local agencies. The Project site will not impact designated environmental or biological resources as it is not located within a conservation area as identified by the (MSHCP). 2) The Project will not have a cumulative impact on the environment. There are no other or previous projects that have occurred in succession in the same place, of the same type, to include a cumulative impact. 3) There are no unusual circumstances identified in relation to the proposed use or Project site which would result in a significant impact on the environment. The Project site is not located within a flood zone per the latest FEMA Flood Zone Maps. The Project site is located within a Very High area per Fire Hazard Severity Zone maps depicted in Figure 8.5 on Page 119 of the General Plan. The nearest fire station is located less than ½ mile east of the Project site. The Project site is not identified within an Alquist-Priolo Fault Zone per the latest maps on file with the California Department of Conservation; the nearest fault zone is the San Andreas Fault located north of the Palm Desert City Limits. 1169 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2875 4 4) The Project site is located within 300 feet of Highway 74, which is a State Scenic Highway. The project, as condition, will not result in any damage to this scenic resource. The project is proposing an outdoor dining patio with construction limited to an attached trellis, walls, storage, and landscaping. The project meets all development standards of the underlying zone and is not proposing a structure height above existing buildings. This proposal is for use of an outdoor area for dining purposes and does not propose any construction that would cause damage to Highway 74. The applicant utilizes landscaping throughout the project site to beautify the area. 5) Hazardous Waste Site: The Project site has not been identified as a hazardous waste site per maps and databases provided by the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC). 6) The Project site does not contain any structure or title that would designate it as a historical resource. Therefore, the Project will not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource. SECTION 4. Project Approval. The Planning Commission hereby recommends approval of CUP23-0015. SECTION 5. Custodian of Records. The documents and materials that constitute the record of proceedings on which these findings are based are located at the City’s office at 73510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, CA 92260. Richard D. Cannone, AICP, the Secretary to the Palm Desert Planning Commission, is the custodian of the record of proceedings. SECTION 6. Execution of Resolution. The Chairperson of the Planning Commission signs this Resolution, and the Secretary to the Commission shall attest and certify to the passage and adoption thereof. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings for approval of the Planning Commission in this case. 2. That the Planning Commission does hereby approve Case No. CUP23-0015, pursuant to the conditions of approval in Exhibit A and the statement of operations in Exhibit B. ADOPTED ON June 18, 2024. JOSEPH PRADETTO CHAIRPERSON 1170 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2875 5 ATTEST: RICHARD D. CANNONE, AICP SECRETARY I, Richard D. Cannone, AICP, Secretary of the City of Palm Desert Palm Commission, hereby certify that Resolution No. 2874 is a full, true, and correct copy, and was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert on June 18, 2024, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSED: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Palm Desert, California, on June ___, 2024. RICHARD D. CANNONE, AICP SECRETARY 1171 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2875 6 EXHIBIT A CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO. CUP23-0015 PLANNING DIVISION: 1. The development of the property shall conform substantially with the approved plans and exhibits on file with the Development Services Department, except as modified by the following conditions. Any variation from the approved plans must be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division prior to building permit issuance and may require review and approval by the ARC, Planning Commission, and/or City Council. 2. The Applicant agrees that in the event of any administrative, legal, or equitable action instituted by a third party challenging the validity of any of the procedures leading to the adoption of these Project Approvals for the Project, or the Project Approvals themselves, the Developer and City each shall have the right, in their sole discretion, to elect whether or not to defend such action. The Developer, at its sole expense, shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City (including its agents, officers, and employees) from any such action, claim, or proceeding with counsel chosen by the City, subject to the Developer’s approval of counsel, which shall not be unreasonably denied, and at the Developer’s sole expense. If the City is aware of such an action or proceeding, it shall promptly notify the Developer and cooperate in the defense. The Developer, upon such notification, shall deposit with City sufficient funds in the judgment of the City Finance Director to cover the expense of defending such action without any offset or claim against said deposit to assure that the City expends no City funds. If both Parties elect to defend, the Parties hereby agree to affirmatively cooperate in defending said action and to execute a joint defense and confidentiality agreement in order to share and protect the information under the joint defense privilege recognized under applicable law. As part of the cooperation in defending an action, City and Developer shall coordinate their defense in order to make the most efficient use of legal counsel and to share and protect information. Developer and City shall each have sole discretion to terminate its defense at any time. The City shall not settle any third-party litigation of Project approvals without the Developer’s consent, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned, or delayed unless the Developer materially breaches this indemnification requirement. 3. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein, which are in addition to the approved development standards listed in the Palm Desert Municipal Code (PDMC), and state and federal statutes now in force, or which hereafter may be in force. 4. The CUP shall expire if construction of the said Project shall not commence within 24 months from the date of final approval unless an extension of time is granted by the Palm Desert Planning Commission; otherwise, said approval shall become null, void, and of no effect whatsoever. 5. All construction documentation shall be coordinated for consistency, including, but not limited to, architectural, structural, mechanical, electrical, plumbing, landscape and 1172 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2875 7 irrigation, grading, and street improvement plans. All such plans shall be consistent with the approved entitlement plans on file with the Development Services Department. 6. The approved CUP shall only be modified with written City approval per PDMC Chapter 25.72.050. Any proposed changes to this CUP will require an amendment to the application, which may require review and approval by the ARC, Planning Commission, and/or City Council. 7. This approval authorizes the operation of a 2,977 square foot outdoor permanent dining patio expansion of the existing “Wildest” restaurant, which includes a pergola/trellis, storage container, fireplace, heaters, lighting, pavers, wall, and landscaping. 8. The use shall operate as an expansion of the adjoining restaurant, consistent with the approved Statement of Operations on file with the Development Services Department and attached as Exhibit B. Any amendments to the proposed hours of operation is subject to the discretion of the Zoning Administrator and shall require a modification of the approved conditions. After-hours use of the facility, other than for routine clean-up maintenance, and deliveries will not be permitted. 9. The Applicant shall execute a written acknowledgment to the Planning Division stating acceptance of and compliance with all the Conditions of Approval of Resolution No. 2874 for CUP23-0015 and that the plans submitted are in compliance with the Conditions of Approval. No modifications shall be made to said plans without written approval from the appropriate decision-making body. 10. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for the construction of any use or structure contemplated by this approval, the Applicant shall first obtain permits and or clearance from the following agencies: Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) Public Works Department Fire Department Building and Safety Division California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control Riverside County Department of Health Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to the Building and Safety Division at the time of issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. 11. A copy of the herein-listed Conditions of Approval shall be included in the construction documentation package for the Project, which shall be continuously maintained on-site during Project construction. 12. Failure to comply with any of these conditions will result in the revocation of this permit subject to PDMC 25.60. 1173 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2875 8 13. The Applicant shall comply with all conditions of approval provided by the City’s Architectural Review Commission on May 28, 2024, as follo ws: A. Roll up door shall be further studied and reviewed by staff regarding its maintainability or be replaced with swinging metal doors. B. A pilaster with the same stone cladding on the building shall be added to the opening at the northeast corner of the patio. C. Gravel placed in planters adjacent to the parking lot shall match existing parking lot gravel. D. Shipping container shall be new or like-new condition. 14. The Applicant shall comply with PDMC Chapter 9.24 for Noise Control Requirements. No loud or disturbing music, sound, or noise shall be detectable from the exterior of the premises. 15. The storage container shall remain consistent with the use and design as presented in this project approval. This includes ensuring the material wrapped around the container remains in good condition and the use remains for storage purposes and not for restaurant operational purposes (such as serving drinks). Any change of design or use shall be submitted to the City’s Development Services department and may require amendment of this Conditional Use Permit. 16. The Applicant shall remove litter from the premises, and adjacent public sidewalks and parking lots daily, and shall keep the areas swept weekly to prevent debris buildup. Trash cans shall be added, and "No Littering" signs shall be posted on the premises. 17. The Applicant shall not permit any loitering on the premises or on property adjacent to the premises. 18. The requirements of PDMC Chapter 8.36 regarding smoking shall be complied with at all times. 19. The Applicant shall submit a landscape plan application for the newly proposed landscaping on the exterior of the project. The proposed landscaping shall be consistent with the preliminary landscape plan provided as part of this Project. 20. The design of the proposed retaining wall is subject to review by the City’s Development Services Department and may require a stucco finish. 21. All permanent and temporary exterior signage shall comply with PDMC 25.56. 22. The Applicant shall provide payment for filing fees for the Notice of Exemption within five (5) days of project approval. LAND DEVELOPMENT 23. The following plans, studies, and exhibits are hereby referenced: Preliminary Grading Plan Lot 5 of Parcel Map 14710 Wildest Restaurant Patio; prepared by Egan Civil, Inc.; dated April 12, 2024. 1174 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2875 9 24. It is understood that the conceptual exhibits correctly show all existing easements, traveled ways, and drainage courses with appropriate Qs, and that major modification with the final plans and reports may require the applicant to process a revised site plan through Planning Commission as directed by the City Engineer. 25. It is assumed that easements shown on the preliminary grading plan shown correctly and include all the easements that encumber the subject property. A current preliminary title report for the site will be required to be submitted during technical pl an review. 26. Prior to building permit, the applicant shall secure approval from all, if any, easement holders for all grading and improvements, which are proposed over the respective easement, including those shown on Instrument No. 08-195654, or provide evidence that the easement has been relocated, quitclaimed, vacated, abandoned, easement holder cannot be found, or is otherwise of no effect. Should such approvals or alternate actions regarding the easements not be provided and approved by the City, the applicant may be required to amend or revise the proposed site configuration as may be necessary. 27. Prior to building permit, the applicant shall submit a final grading plan that includes grading of parking lot, proposed site and patio, and proposed drainage. The grading plans shall be submitted as part of the building plan set and be in conformance with the preliminary grading exhibit. The City Engineer shall approve the final grading as part of the building permit review. 28. Prior to final building permit inspection, the applicant shall schedule an inspection from the City’s Engineering department. The inspection shall verify compliance of the built improvements with the final grading plans requested on these conditions of approval. COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 29. The Applicant will need to send applications to the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) for re-evaluation of the grease interceptor sizing and capacity charges. Application(s) include the Cost Notification Application, Source Control application, and a copy of plumbing and seating plans. RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMANT 30. Fire Department Building Construction Plan Review – Submittal of construction plans to the Fire Department will be required. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when the Fire Department reviews the plans. These conditions will be based on California Fire Code, California Building Code (CBC), and related codes/standards adopted at the time of construction plan submittal. Reference CFC as amended. 31. Fire Sprinkler System – All new commercial areas of the building and structures shall be evaluate for the extension of the existing fire sprinkler system. Reference CFC as amended. 1175 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2875 10 32. Fire Alarm and Detection System – A water flow monitoring system and/or fire alarm system may be required to be extended into the new areas as determined at time of building construction plan review. Reference CFC as amended. END OF CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1176 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2875 11 EXHIBIT B Statement of Operations 1177 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2875 12 1178 C I T Y O F P A L M D E S E R T 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260-2578 TEL: 760-346-0611 PLANNING@PALMDESERT.GOV ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION NOTICE OF ACTION June 4, 2024 Wildest Restaurant and Bar Ms. Charissa Farley – Hay PO Box 14450 Palm Desert, CA 92255 Subject: Consideration to approve a Design Review for the architecture and landscaping associated with an outdoor patio remodel for Wildest Restaurant at 72990 El Paseo, Suite #3 The Architectural Review Commission of the City of Palm Desert considered your request and took the following action at its meeting of May 28, 2024: Following discussion, MOTION BY CHAIR VUKSIC, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER MCAULIFFE, CARRIED 6-0 (VICE CHAIR MCINTOSH ABSENT); to approve Case No. DR23-0015 with the following conditions: 1. Roll up door shall be further studied and reviewed by staff regarding its maintainability or be replaced with swinging metal doors. 2. A pilaster with the same stone cladding on the building shall be added to the opening at the northeast corner of the patio. 3. Gravel placed in planters adjacent to the parking lot shall match existing parking lot gravel. 4. Shipping container shall be new or like-new condition. Pursuant to Palm Desert Municipal Code Section 25.60.080, any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk, City of Palm Desert, within 15 days of the date of the decision. If you have any questions, please contact Principal Planner, Carlos Flores, at (760) 776-6478 or cflores@palmdesert.gov. Sincerely, CARLOS FLORES, SECRETARY ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION cc: File 1179 1180 OUTDOOR PATIO REMODEL FOR WILDEST RESTAURANT 72990 EL PASEO #3 PALM DESERT, CA92260 NO.TITLE A0.00 COVER SHEET & PROJECT INFO 1 PARTIAL SURVEY PLAN 2 PARTIAL SURVEY PLAN A-1.10 OVERALL EXISTING SITE PLAN A-1.20 PARKING COUNT A-1.21 OVERALL NEW SITE PLAN A-1.22 PARTIAL NEW SITE PLAN A-1.23 PARTIAL NEW SITE PLAN 1 PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN L-1 LANDSCAPE PLAN A-1.30 TRASH ENCLOSURE - DETAILS A-1.31 DETAILS A-1.40 SITE SECTIONS A-1.50 SITE ELECTRICAL PLAN A-2.00 MATERIAL BOARD A-2.01 MATERIAL BOARD A-3.00 EXISTING SOUTH EAST VIEW A-3.01 EXISTING SOUTH WEST VIEW A-3.02 EXISTING SOUTH VIEW A-4.00 NEW ESOUTH EAST VIEW A-4.01 NEW SOUTH WEST VIEW A-4.02 NEW SOUTH VIEW A-4.03 NEW WEST VIEW A-4.04 NEW AERIAL VIEW A-4.10 NEW ELEVATIONS AREA CALCULATIONS LOT AREA:1.12 ACRES = 48,787 SQ. FT. = 100% EXISTING BUILDING AREA: 0.22 ACRES = 9,728 SQ.FT.= 19.6% PROPOSED DINING PATIO 0.06 ACRES = 2,977 SQ. FT.= 6.10% LANDSCAPE AREA 0.06 ACRES = 3,277 SQ. FT.= 6.71% ASPHALT AREA 0.75 ACRES = 28,867 SQ. FT.= 59.52% CONCRETE AREA 0.75 ACRES = 3,938 SQ. FT.= 8.07% DESIGN TEAM OWNER / APPLICANT: CHARSSA FARLEY-HAY EL PASEO STE. 3&4 PALM DESERT CA,92260 PH: 760.636.0441 EMAIL: charissa@kaswit.com DESIGNER: ZAYDA BRAUN DESIGNS ZAYDA BRAUN 42920 CABALLEROS DR BERMUDA DUNES, CA 92203 PH: 760.898.4865 EMAIL: zayda@zbraundesigns.com PROJECT DESCRIPTION ADDRESS: 72990 EL PASEO PALM DESERT, CA 92260 APN: 640170013 LEGAL DESCRIPTION 1.12 ACRES NET IN PAR 5 PM 083/022 PM 14710 SUBDIVISIONNAME PM 14710 ACRES 001.12 NET LOTTYPE PARCEL PARCEL 5 RECMAP TYPE PARCEL MAP MAPPLATB 083 MAPPLATP VICINITY MAP CIVIL ENGINEER: BENJAMIN EGAN ENGAN CIVIL INC 46150 COMMERCE ST, SITE. 100 INDIO, CA 92201 PH: 760.404.7663 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: TOM DOCZI TKD ASSOCIATES, INC. 71-711 SAN JACINTO DR, SITE. C RANCHO MIRAGE, CA 92270 SHEET INDEX SITE HIGHWAY 111 MONTEREY DREL PASEOPLAZA WAYN.T.S. A0.00 COVER SHEET & PROJECT INFO. FEBRUARY.29.2024 Sheet: Date: Scale: PATIO REMODEL FOR WILDEST RESTAURANT 72990 EL PASEO #3 PALM DESERT CA,. 92260 z a y d a @ z b r a u n d e s i g n s . c o m 7 6 0 . 8 9 8 . 4 8 6 5 w w w . Z b r a u n d e s i g n s . c o m D E S I G N S 1181 M(251.74)(EG)(251.28)(EG)(252.53)(EG)(252.44)(EG)(252.35)(EG)(252.70)(EG)(251.19)(EG)(250.98)(EG)(249.62)(EG)(249.73)(EG)(249.52)(EG)(248.17)(EG)(250.02)(EG)(251.74)(EG)(252.86)(EG)(251.38)(EG)(249.74)(EG)(252.85)(EG)(WTR) (VLV)(252.73)(EG)(252.85)(EG)(252.75)(EG)(WTR) (VLV)(249.28)(EG)(252.44)(EG)(248.49)(EG)(248.30)(EG)(248.77)(EG)(248.47)(EG)(248.09)(EG)(247.89)(EG)(248.04)(EG)(247.53)(EG)(247.70)(EG)(246.78)(EG)(247.19)(EG)(247.70)(EG)(247.30)(EG)(248.68)(EG)(248.32)(EG)(246.52)(EG)(246.92)(EG)(247.03)(EG)(246.23)(EG)(246.19)(EG)(245.84)(EG)(244.05)(EG)(243.47)(EG)(244.56)(EG)(244.97)(EG)(245.66)(EG)(245.73)(EG)(246.38)(EG)(248.23)(EG)(248.42)(EG)(248.51)(EG)(247.66)(EG)(247.23)(EG)(246.76)(EG)(246.65)(EG)(246.33)(EG)(250.34)(EG)(249.50)(EG)(247.63)(EG)8''SS (247.95RIM) SSMH W (247.15)(EG)(247.25)(EG)(247.27)(EG)(247.23)(EG)(TRASH ENCLOSURE)(250.28)(EG)(250.37)(EG)(250.36)(EG)(250.38)(EG)(250.34)(EG)(250.29)(EG)(250.22)(EG)(250.19)(EG)(250.08)(EG)(250.17)(EG)(250.23)(EG)(250.05)(EG)(249.16)(EG)(249.05)(EG)(247.89)(EG)(247.54)(EG)(248.52)(EG)(247.60)(EG)(246.97)(EG)(249.38)(EG)(246.49)(EG)(246.33)(EG)(245.95)(EG)(249.26)(EG)(248.71)(EG)(247.88)(EG)(252)(251)(250)(249)(250)(253)(253)(251 ) (25 0 ) (253) (253) (251 ) (250)(253)(252)(251)(250)(249)(248)( 2 4 7 ) (2 4 7 )(251)(252)(248)(248)(249)( 2 4 7 ) (2 4 6 ) (247)(246)(245)(244)(TEL C O M ) 4 G (CONCRETE) (ASPHALT) (ASPHALT) (ASPHALT) (ASPHALT) (ASPHALT) (ASPHALT) ( 24" CML/CMC W A T E R M A I N ) ( 8" CML/CMC WA T E R M A I N )8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS(SEWER)G(TELE-MH) 8''SS (SSCO)(GAS PER USA MARKOUT)(ELECTRICAL PER USA MARKOUT)(ELECTRICAL PER USA MARKOUT)(TELECOM PER USA MARKOUT)(ELECTRICAL P E R U S A M A R K O U T ) (ELECTRICAL P E R U S A M A R K O U T ) (TELEC O M P E R U S A M A R K O U T )(TELECOM PER USA MARKOUT)(GAS PER USA MARKOUT)(TELECOM PER USA MARKOUT)(TELECOM PER USA MARKOUT)(FF = 247.0) ( 2 4 6 . 8 8 T C ) ( 2 4 6 . 3 1 F S ) ( 2 4 7 . 0 0 T C ) ( 2 4 6 . 5 6 F S ) ( 2 4 9 . 9 9 T C ) ( 2 4 9 . 5 1 F S ) ( 2 4 9 . 7 0 T C ) ( 2 4 9 . 3 5 F S ) ( 2 4 8 . 7 2 T C ) ( 2 4 8 . 0 0 F S ) ( 2 4 8 . 1 5 T C ) ( 2 4 7 . 8 0 F S ) ( 2 4 7 . 0 3 T C ) ( 2 4 6 . 9 3 F S ) ( 2 4 9 . 8 2 T C ) ( 2 4 9 . 4 5 F S ) ( 2 4 9 . 8 2 T C ) ( 2 4 9 . 4 5 F S ) ( 2 5 1 . 4 9 T C ) ( 2 5 0 . 8 9 F S ) ( 2 4 7 . 0 2 T C ) ( 2 4 6 . 6 5 F S ) ( 2 4 8 . 1 9 T C ) ( 2 4 7 . 8 4 F S ) ( 2 4 8 . 9 1 T C ) ( 2 4 8 . 6 0 F S ) ( 2 4 8 . 1 2 T C ) ( 2 4 7 . 7 6 F S ) ( 2 4 6 . 8 6 T C ) ( 2 4 6 . 4 1 F S ) ( 2 4 6 . 9 6 T C ) ( 2 4 6 . 5 3 I N V ) ( C U R B D R A I N ) ( 2 4 7 . 0 5 T C ) ( 2 4 6 . 7 6 F S ) ( 2 4 6 . 5 1 T C ) ( 2 4 6 . 1 2 F S ) ( 2 4 7 . 0 0 T C ) ( 2 4 6 . 4 0 I N V ) ( C U R B D R A I N ) ( 2 D R A I N S ) ( 2 D R A I N S ) ( 2 4 6 . 5 0 I N V ) ( C U R B D R A I N ) ( 2 D R A I N S ) ( 2 4 7 . 0 1 T C ) (EXISTING BUILDING) (CONCRETE) (CONCRETE)(CONCRETE)(CONCRETE)(SSCO)( 2 4 5 . 6 2 T C ) ( 2 4 5 . 0 8 F S ) ( 2 4 9 . 5 3 T C ) ( 2 4 8 . 9 9 F S ) ( 2 4 7 . 9 8 T C ) ( 2 4 7 . 6 0 F S ) ( 2 5 0 . 0 5 T C ) ( 2 4 9 . 6 1 F S ) ( 2 4 9 . 8 0 T C ) ( 2 4 9 . 4 2 F S ) ( 2 4 8 . 9 9 T C ) ( 2 4 8 . 5 5 F S ) (PLANTER)8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SSPAR C E L 4 10.00'15 20 20 20 14 14 6 . 0 0 ' 1 3 EL PASEO 20.00'1220.00'1220.00'1210 10(N00°29'20"W 270.00')(N00°29'20"W 326.00')(N89°30'40" E 1 2 3 . 0 0 ' )(N00°29'20"W 56.00')(N89°30'40" E 3 3 . 0 0 ' )(88.00')14 SSMH (244.48RIM) M(251.74)(EG)(251.28)(EG)(252.53)(EG)(252.44)(EG)(252.35)(EG)(252.70)(EG)(251.19)(EG)(250.98)(EG)(249.62)(EG)(249.73)(EG)(249.52)(EG)(248.17)(EG)(250.02)(EG)(251.74)(EG)(252.86)(EG)(251.38)(EG)(249.74)(EG)(252.85)(EG)(WTR) (VLV)(252.73)(EG)(252.85)(EG)(252.75)(EG)(WTR) (VLV)(249.28)(EG)(252.44)(EG)(248.49)(EG)(248.30)(EG)(248.77)(EG)(248.47)(EG)(248.09)(EG)(247.89)(EG)(248.04)(EG)(247.53)(EG)(247.70)(EG)(246.78)(EG)(247.19)(EG)(247.70)(EG)(247.30)(EG)(248.68)(EG)(248.32)(EG)(246.52)(EG)(246.92)(EG)(247.03)(EG)(246.23)(EG)(246.19)(EG)(245.84)(EG)(244.05)(EG)(242.82)(EG)(243.47)(EG)(244.56)(EG)(244.97)(EG)(243.78)(EG)(242.67)(EG)(242.55)(EG)(243.58)(EG)(242.39)(EG)(243.30)(EG)(243.33)(EG)(242.30)(EG)(242.23)(EG)(242.18)(EG)(241.93)(EG)(241.80)(EG)(242.19)(EG)(242.94)(EG)(242.35)(EG)(242.25)(EG)(241.93)(EG)(243.08)(EG)(242.86)(EG)(242.92)(EG)(242.59)(EG)(243.41)(EG)(243.71)(EG)(244.76)(EG)(244.07)(EG)(244.07)(EG)(244.43)(EG)(244.50)(EG)(244.79)(EG)(245.66)(EG)(246.41)(EG)(245.73)(EG)(246.38)(EG)(246.43)(EG)(245.88)(EG)(246.47)(EG)(246.16)(EG)(246.22)(EG)(245.91)(EG)(245.27)(EG)(244.20)(EG)(245.93)(EG)(244.49)(EG)(242.73)(EG)(242.34)(EG)(242.98)(EG)(245.62)(EG)(248.23)(EG)(248.42)(EG)(248.51)(EG)(247.66)(EG)(247.23)(EG)(246.76)(EG)(246.65)(EG)(246.33)(EG)(246.05)(EG)(246.07)(EG)(250.34)(EG)(249.50)(EG)(247.63)(EG)(247.95RIM) SSMH W (246.31)(EG)(247.15)(EG)(247.25)(EG)(247.27)(EG)(247.23)(EG)(TRASH ENCLOSURE)(250.28)(EG)(250.37)(EG)(250.36)(EG)(250.38)(EG)(250.34)(EG)(250.29)(EG)(250.22)(EG)(250.19)(EG)(250.08)(EG)(250.17)(EG)(250.23)(EG)(250.05)(EG)(249.16)(EG)(249.05)(EG)(247.89)(EG)(247.54)(EG)(248.52)(EG)(247.60)(EG)(246.97)(EG)(249.38)(EG)(246.49)(EG)(246.33)(EG)(245.95)(EG)(249.26)(EG)(248.71)(EG)(247.88)(EG)SPEED BUMP (25 2) (251)(250)(249)(250)(253 ) (25 3 ) (251) (250) (253) (253) (251) (250)(253)(252)(251)(250)(249)(248)(2 4 7 )(248)(248)(249)( 2 4 7 ) (2 4 6 ) (247) (2 46 ) (245 )(244)(243)(2 4 5 )(245)(244)(243)(244)(243)(244)(243)(244)(245)(242)(243) (244) (24 5) (246)(244)(243)(245)(TELCOM) SSMH (242.30RIM) (X-FRMR) (P5168509) 4 3 (ELEC. ROOM) (FACP) 2 3 WILDEST GREENS 1 FIRE RISER G (CONCRETE) (ASPHALT) (ASPHALT) (ASPHALT) (ASPHALT) (ASPHALT) (ASPHALT) (ASPHALT) (ASPHALT) (ASPHALT) (ASPHALT) (ASPHALT) (ASPHALT) (24" CML/CMC WATER MAIN) (8" CML/CMC WATER MAIN) 8''SS 8''SS 8''SS 8''SS 8''SS 8''SS 8''SS 8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS(SEWER)(SEWER)(SEWER) (S E W E R ) (SEWER ) (S E W E R ) (E L E C T R I C A L P E R U S A M A R K O U T )(ELECTRICAL PER USA MARKOUT)(ELECTRIC A L P E R U S A M A R K O U T )8''SS8''SS8''SS(SEWE R L A T E R A L)GGGG (TELE-MH) (SSCO) (G A S P E R U S A M ARKOU T ) (G A S P ER US A M A R K O U T ) (GAS) (S S CO) (S S CO) (SSCO) (E L E C T RICAL P E R U S A M A R K O U T )(ELEC T R I C A L P E R U S A MARKO U T ) (E L E C T R I C A L P E R USA M A R K O U T ) (TEL E C O M PER U S A M ARK O U T ) (ELECTRICAL PER USA MARKOUT) (ELECTRICAL PER USA MARKOUT) (TELECOM PER US A M A R K O U T )(TEL E C O M P E R U S A MA R K O U T ) (G A S P E R U S A MARK O U T ) (SEWER) (S E W E R ) (E L E C T R I C A L P E R U S A M A R K O U T ) (ELECT R I C A L P E R U S A M A RKOUT)(TEL E C O M P E R U S A MA R K O U T )(TELE C O M PER U S A MAR K O U T ) (TEL E C O M PER U S A M ARK O U T ) (T E L ECO M P E R USA M A R K OUT) (E L E C T R I C A L P E R U S A M A R K O U T ) (E L E C T R I C A L VAULT ) (FF = 247.0) (FF = 247.0) ( 2 4 6 . 8 8 T C ) ( 2 4 6 . 3 1 F S ) (2 4 7 . 0 0 T C ) (2 4 6 . 5 6 F S ) (2 4 6 . 2 0 T C ) (2 4 5 . 3 4 F S ) (2 4 5 . 6 9 T C ) (2 4 5 . 3 2 F S ) (246. 8 4 T C ) (246.3 0 F S ) (2 4 9 . 9 9 T C ) ( 2 4 9 . 5 1 F S ) ( 2 4 9 . 7 0 T C ) ( 2 4 9 . 3 5 F S ) (2 4 8 . 7 2 T C ) (2 4 8 . 0 0 F S ) (2 4 8 . 1 5 T C ) (2 4 7 . 8 0 F S ) (2 4 7 . 0 3 T C ) ( 2 4 6 . 9 3 F S ) (2 4 9 . 8 2 T C ) (2 4 9 . 4 5 F S ) (2 4 9 . 8 2 T C ) (2 4 9 . 4 5 F S ) ( 2 5 1 . 4 9 T C ) (2 5 0 . 8 9 F S ) ( 2 4 6 . 2 2 T C ) (2 4 5 . 4 8 F S ) (2 4 7 . 0 4 T C ) ( 2 4 6 . 5 9 F S ) (2 4 5 . 1 6 T C ) ( 2 4 5 . 3 4 F S ) ( 2 4 7 . 0 2 T C ) (2 4 6 . 6 5 F S ) (2 4 6 . 0 3 T C ) ( 2 4 5 . 8 0 F S ) ( 2 4 8 . 1 9 T C ) (2 4 7 . 8 4 F S ) ( 2 4 8 . 9 1 T C ) (2 4 8 . 6 0 F S ) ( 2 4 8 . 1 2 T C ) (2 4 7 . 7 6 F S ) ( 2 4 6 . 8 6 T C ) (2 4 6 . 4 1 F S ) (2 4 6 . 9 6 T C ) (2 4 6 . 5 3 I N V ) (C U R B D R A I N ) ( 2 4 7 . 0 5 T C ) ( 2 4 6 . 7 6 F S ) ( 2 4 6 . 5 1 T C ) (2 4 6 . 1 2 F S ) (2 4 7 . 0 0 T C ) ( 2 4 6 . 4 0 I N V ) ( C U R B D R A I N ) (2 D R A I N S ) ( 2 D R A I N S ) (2 4 7 . 0 0 T C ) (2 4 6 . 3 5 I N V ) (C U R B D R A I N ) (2 D R A I N S ) (2 4 7 . 0 0 T C ) ( 2 4 6 . 4 5 I N V ) ( C U R B D R A I N ) ( 2 D R A I N S ) ( 2 4 7 . 0 0 T C ) ( 2 4 6 . 6 5 I N V ) (C U R B D R A I N ) (2 D R A I N S ) (2 4 6 )(246)(2 4 7 . 0 8 T C ) (2 4 6 . 6 0 I N V ) (C U R B D R A I N ) (2 D R A I N S ) (2 4 6 . 5 0 I N V ) (C U R B D R A I N ) ( 2 D R A I N S ) ( 2 4 6 . 9 8 T C ) (2 4 6 . 5 6 I N V ) ( C U R B D R A I N ) ( 2 D R A I N S ) (2 4 7 . 0 1 T C ) (EXISTING BUILDING) (EXISTING BUILDING) (CONCRETE) (CONCRETE) (CONCRETE) (CONCRETE) (C O N C R E TE) (C O N C R E T E ) (C O N CRETE)(CONCR E T E ) (C O N C R E T E ) (CONCRE T E ) (C O N C R E T E )(CONCR E T E ) (G R E A S E ) (T R A P ) (S S C O )(SSCO ) ( 2 4 4 . 5 1 T C ) (2 4 4 . 2 7 F S ) ( 2 4 5 . 0 8 T C ) (2 4 4 . 6 0 F S ) (2 4 5 . 6 2 T C ) ( 2 4 5 . 0 8 F S ) ( 2 4 9 . 5 3 T C ) (2 4 8 . 9 9 F S ) ( 2 4 7 . 9 8 T C ) ( 2 4 7 . 6 0 F S ) (2 5 0 . 0 5 T C ) (2 4 9 . 6 1 F S ) ( 2 4 9 . 8 0 T C ) (2 4 9 . 4 2 F S ) (2 4 8 . 9 9 T C ) (2 4 8 . 5 5 F S ) ( 2 4 5 . 5 4 T C ) (2 4 5 . 9 5 F S ) (2 4 4 . 1 0 T C ) (2 4 3 . 9 0 F S ) (2 4 3 . 5 7 T C ) ( 2 4 3 . 3 5 F S ) (PLANTER) (P L A N T E R ) (PLANTER) (SSCO)8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SSPAR C E L 4 PAR C E L 3 PAR C E L 2 PAR C E L 1 10.00'15 10.00'15 20 20 20 14 14 14 14 14 14 6. 0 0 ' 13 6. 0 0 ' 6. 0 0 ' 13 13 6. 0 0 ' 13 PARCEL 5 EL PASEO 20 . 0 0 ' 12 20 . 0 0 ' 12 20 . 0 0 ' 12 10 10 10 10 10 (N00°2 9 ' 2 0 " W 2 7 0 . 0 0 ' ) (1 0 6 . 0 0 ' ) (7 6 . 0 0 ' ) (N89°30'40"E 156.00') (N 0 0 ° 2 9 ' 2 0 " W 326 . 0 0 ' ) (N89°30'40"E 123.00') (N 0 0 ° 2 9 ' 20"W 5 6 . 0 0 ' ) (N89°30'40"E 33.00') (8 8 . 0 0 ' ) 14 UNDER REVIEW SURVEY EXHIBIT 2 1 NO. 8756BENJAMIN DANIEL EGA N PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR STA TE OF CALIFORNIAPO BOX 5282, LA QUINTA, CA 92248-5282EGAN CIVIL, INC.(760) 404-7663 WWW.EGANCIVIL.COMHV-11350.00CU R B A N D SI D E W A L K AW N I N G BUILDINGEDGE OF DIRTED G E O F A S P H .EDGE OF CONC.CONTROL1350.00V-1FIRE HYDRANTPOOLROADSTRIPESPARKINGGUARD RAILWALLRE T A I N I N G FENCEPoolPSTANDPIPEMA N H O L E PIPE LINECATCH BASINVA L V E TA N K DR O P I N L E T VA U L T RAILROADRAIL SIGNALIN T E R C O N T O U R POWER POLEST R E E T L I G H T PO W E R P O L E W /STREET LIGHTMI S C E L L A N E O U SSINGLE TREEINDEX CONTOURTRAFFIC SIGNALGUY WIRESPMHPALMTR E E S SI G N 13401350SYMBOL LEGEND:WALLGUTTERST R I P I N G ROADWAYSBARRIERSPAVEMENT MARKINGSAND SIGNAGERAILROAD AND TRANSITUTILITY (WET)UTILITY (DRY)LANDSCAPINGAND TERRAINPP PPABBREVIATIONS:C/L CENTERLINECOR. CORNERE EASTEG EXISTING GROUNDFL FLOW LINEFS FINISH SURFACEGPS GLOBAL POS. SYSTEMHYD. FIRE HYDRANTIP IRON PIPEMB MAP BOOKMON. MONUMENTN NORTHREF. REFERENCER/W RIGHT-OF-WAYRS RECORD OF SURVEYPMB PARCEL MAP BOOKS SOUTHSEC. SECTIONSD M H S T O R M D R A I N M A N H O L E SS M H S A N . S E W E R M A N H O L E TC T O P O F C U R B TCOL TOP OF COLUMNTW TOP OF WALLVLV. VALVEW WESTWM WATER METER(XX.XX) EXISTING ELEVATION CALLOUTDATE OF FIELD SURVEY: 09/10/2020 & 09/23/2020 & 12/12/2023 BENCHMARK:BASIS OF BEARINGS:RECORD DATA: () DENOTES RECORD DATA PER PARCEL MAP NO. 14710 (PMB 83/22-23) & MEASURED. THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED IN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PARCEL A: PARCEL 5 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 14710, IN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 83, PAGES 22 AND 23 OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. PARCEL B: A NON-EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT FOR PEDESTRIAN, AUTOMOTIVE, INGRESS, EGRESS AND PARKING, AS CONTAINED IN THE DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIONS AND GRANT OF EASEMENTS RECORDED OCTOBER 16, 1979 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 219707 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.INDICATES FOUND 3/4" IRON PIPE WITH PLASTIC PLUG STAMPED"LS 4146", PER PMB 83/22-23BE N C H M A R K : PD # 1 3 9 ELEVATION: 245.597 DATUM: NAVD88DE S C R I P T I O N : 2" B R A S S D I S K S E T F L U S H I N T O P O F C A T C H B A S I N O N W E S T E R L Y S I D E OF H I G H W A Y 7 4 , 1 7 6 F T N O R T H E R L Y O F E C R O F E L P A S E O , 3 . 8 F T W E S T O F C F .BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE OF PARCEL 2, ASSHOWN BY A MAP ON FILE IN PARCEL MAP BOOK 83, PAGES 22 THROUGH 23 INCLUSIVE OFMAPS, RECORDS OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BEING: NORTH89°30'40" EAST.LEGAL DESCRIPTION:BOUNDARY & TOPOGRAPHICSURVEY EXHIBITLOT 5 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 14710 (PMB 83/22-23)PREPARED FOR: EL PASEO WEST PROPERTIES, LLC. C/O MATT JOHNSON 72000 MAGNESIA FALLS DR, STE 4 RANCHO MIRAGE, CA 92270 APN PROPERTY ADDRESS: 72990 EL PASEO PALM DESERT, CA 92260 72990 EL PASEO, PALM DESERT, CA 92260 EL PASEO WEST PROPERTIES, LLCDISCLAIMER: I N F O R M A T I O N S H O W N I S C O M P I L E D S T R I C T L Y FR O M T H E F I E L D S U R V E Y , F I R S T A M E R I C A N T I T L E I N S U R A N C E CO M P A N Y N O . N C S - 1 0 3 0 6 3 8 - O N T 1 D A T E D 9 / 1 1 / 2 0 2 0 A N D PUBLIC RECORDS LIMITED TO OFFICIAL MAPS FILED IN THECOUNTY SURVEYORS OFFICE. THE ABOVE MENTIONED SOURCESARE THE BASIS FOR ALL CONSTRAINTS PLOTTED HEREON. THISMAY NOT BE EXHAUSTIVE AND ADDITIONAL CONSTRAINTS MAYEXIST WHICH ARE NOT DISCLOSED IN THE ABOVE. THE CLIENTIS ADVISED TO CONTACT THE CITY FOR ADDITIONALINFORMATION ON BUILDING DESIGN REGULATIONS.EXHIBIT UPDATED: 03/04/2024 72990 EL PASEO, PALM DESERT, CA, 92260 LOT 5 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 14710 (PMB 83/22-23) BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY EXHIBIT IN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA 640-170-013 SURVEY NOTES:1" = 10' 20200499 MARCH 4, 2024 JO/HA TE/BDE 20200499 SHEETS FILE NO. OF S H E E T JOB NUMBER SCALE DATE FOR:DATE:P.L.S. 8756BE N J A M I N D A N I E L E G A N , P E , P L SDATE BY DESCRIPTION APP'D DATER E V I S I O N SFIELD CREW MAPPING 03/04/202410 5 10 20 30 SCALE: 1"=10' 0 SCALE: 1"=40'MONTEREY AVEHI GH W A Y 1 11 PLAZA WAYEL PASEO HIG H W A Y 7 4 NO T T O S C A L E VICINITY MAP SITEPALM DESERTKEY MAP EASEMENTS: 1. ANY DEFECT, LIEN, ENCUMBRANCE, ADVERSE CLAIM, OR OTHER MATTER THAT APPEARS FOR THE FIRST TIME IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OR IS CREATED, ATTACHES, OR IS DISCLOSED BETWEEN THE COMMITMENT DATE AND THE DATE ON WHICH ALL OF THE SCHEDULE B, PART I-REQUIREMENTS ARE MET. 2. (A) TAXES OR ASSESSMENTS THAT ARE NOT SHOWN AS EXISTING LIENS BY THE RECORDS OF ANY TAXING AUTHORITYTHAT LEVIES TAXES OR ASSESSMENTS ON REAL PROPERTY OR BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS; (B) PROCEEDINGS BY A PUBLIC AGENCY THAT MAY RESULT IN TAXES OR ASSESSMENTS, OR NOTICES OF SUCH PROCEEDINGS, WHETHER OR NOT SHOWN BY THE RECORDS OF SUCH AGENCY OR BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS. 3. ANY FACTS, RIGHTS, INTERESTS, OR CLAIMS THAT ARE NOT SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS BUT THAT COULD BE ASCERTAINED BY AN INSPECTION OF THE LAND OR THAT MAY BE ASSERTED BY PERSONS IN POSSESSION OF THE LAND. 4. EASEMENTS, LIENS OR ENCUMBRANCES, OR CLAIMS THEREOF, NOT SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS. 5. ANY ENCROACHMENT, ENCUMBRANCE, VIOLATION, VARIATION, OR ADVERSE CIRCUMSTANCE AFFECTING THE TITLE THAT WOULD BE DISCLOSED BY AN ACCURATE AND COMPLETE LAND SURVEY OF THE LAND AND NOT SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS. 6. (A) UNPATENTED MINING CLAIMS; (B) RESERVATIONS OR EXCEPTIONS IN PATENTS OR IN ACTS AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE THEREOF; (C) WATER RIGHTS, CLAIMS OR TITLE TO WATER, WHETHER OR NOT THE MATTERS EXCEPTED UNDER (A), (B), OR (C) ARE SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS. 7. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND ASSESSMENTS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2020-2021, A LIEN NOT YET DUE OR PAYABLE. 8. THE LAND LIES WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF PROPOSED COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1, AS DISCLOSED BY A MAP FILED JANUARY 05, 1990 IN BOOK 28, PAGE 75 OF MAPS OF ASSESSMENT AND COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICTS. 9. THE LIEN OF SUPPLEMENTAL TAXES, IF ANY, ASSESSED PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 3.5 COMMENCING WITH SECTION 75 OF THE CALIFORNIA REVENUE AND TAXATION CODE. 10. AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITIES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, RECORDED NOVEMBER 26, 1928 IN BOOK 790 OF DEEDS, PAGE 402. IN FAVOR OF: SOUTHERN SIERRAS POWER COMPANY AFFECTS: AS DESCRIBED THEREIN 11. AN EASEMENT FOR UTILITY AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, RECORDED MAY 11, 1951 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 20201 IN BOOK 1270, PAGE 339 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. IN FAVOR OF: CALIFORNIA ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY AFFECTS: AS DESCRIBED THEREIN THE LOCATION OF THE EASEMENT CANNOT BE DETERMINED FROM RECORD INFORMATION. 12. AN EASEMENT FOR UTILITY AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, RECORDED SEPTEMBER 17, 1958 AS BOOK 2333, PAGE 569 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. IN FAVOR OF: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY AFFECTS: AS DESCRIBED THEREIN THE LOCATION OF THE EASEMENT CANNOT BE DETERMINED FROM RECORD INFORMATION. 13. AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITIES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, RECORDED MAY 14, 1979 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 98333 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. IN FAVOR OF: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY, A CORPORATION AFFECTS: AS DESCRIBED THEREIN 14. THE TERMS, PROVISIONS AND EASEMENT(S) CONTAINED IN THE DOCUMENT ENTITLED DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIONS AND GRANT OF EASEMENTS RECORDED OCTOBER 16, 1979 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 219707 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. 15. AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, RECORDED DECEMBER 11, 1979 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 263220 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. IN FAVOR OF: CAL-AMERICAN INCOME PROPERTY FUND, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY, AN OREGON CORPORATION; HWS PALM DESERT, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; AND CLARE BUILDERS, INC., A CORPORATION AFFECTS: AS DESCRIBED THEREIN 16. A DEED OF TRUST TO SECURE AN ORIGINAL INDEBTEDNESS OF $2,842,000.00 RECORDED JUNE 14, 1989 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 195347 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. DATED: JUNE 13, 1989 TRUSTOR: RPM INVESTMENTS INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION ("RPM"), AMERICAN DEFERRED EXCHANGE CORP., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION ("ADEC"), AND FRANK OEHLBAUM, AS TRUSTEE OF THE FRANK OEHLBAUM TRUST DATED NOVEMBER 9, 1988 TRUSTEE: COLUMBIA FINANCIAL CORPORATION, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION BENEFICIARY: COLUMBIA SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION AFFECTS: THE LAND AND OTHER PROPERTY. A DOCUMENT ENTITLED "TENANT LEASE ASSIGNMENT" RECORDED JUNE 14, 1989 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 195348 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, AS ADDITIONAL SECURITY FOR THE PAYMENT OF THE INDEBTEDNESS SECURED BY THE DEED OF TRUST. 17. A DEED OF TRUST TO SECURE AN ORIGINAL INDEBTEDNESS OF $2,800,000.00 RECORDED OCTOBER 23, 1989 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 367501 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. DATED: OCTOBER 10, 1989 TRUSTOR: FRANK OEHLBAUM, AS TRUSTEE OF THE FRANK OEHLBAUM TRUST DATED NOVEMBER 9, 1988, AN UNDIVIDED 13.5% INTEREST; WILSHIRE-ALEXANDRIA CO., A CALIFORNIA GENERAL PARTNERSHIP, AN UNDIVIDED 36.5% INTEREST; BRANDT AND BRANDT, A PARTNERSHIP, A CALIFORNIA GENERAL PARTNERSHIP, AN UNDIVIDED 50% INTEREST TRUSTEE: FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY BENEFICIARY: THE CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY AFFECTS: THE LAND AND OTHER PROPERTY. A DOCUMENT ENTITLED "ABSOLUTE ASSIGNMENT OF LEASES AND RENTS" RECORDED OCTOBER 23, 1989 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 367502 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, AS ADDITIONAL SECURITY FOR THE PAYMENT OF THE INDEBTEDNESS SECURED BY THE DEED OF TRUST. A DOCUMENT RECORDED JULY 22, 1994 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 291854 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS PROVIDES THAT THE DEED OF TRUST OR THE OBLIGATION SECURED THEREBY HAS BEEN MODIFIED. 18. THE TERMS AND PROVISIONS CONTAINED IN THE DOCUMENT ENTITLED "RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT" RECORDED AUGUST 06, 2003 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2003-597460 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. 19. AN EASEMENT FOR PRESERVING AND MAINTAINING THE EXTERIOR APPEARANCE OF THE PROPERTY AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, RECORDED MARCH 20, 2008 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 08-138234 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. IN FAVOR OF: CITY OF PALM DESERT, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AFFECTS: AS DESCRIBED THEREIN (BLANKET IN NATURE - APPEARS TO BE EXPIRED) 20. THE TERMS AND PROVISIONS CONTAINED IN THE DOCUMENT ENTITLED MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT, EXECUTED BY AND BETWEEN 20 EL PASEO, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AND FRESH & EASY NEIGHBORHOOD MARKET, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, RECORDED APRIL 21, 2008, AS INSTRUMENT NO. INSTRUMENT NO. 08-196564 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. (OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE IS REVIEWING THIS ITEM WITH TITLE FOR POSSIBLE REMOVAL) 21. A DEED OF TRUST TO SECURE AN ORIGINAL INDEBTEDNESS OF $1,980,000.00 RECORDED DECEMBER 15, 2011 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2011-0556148 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. DATED: DECEMBER 13, 2011 TRUSTOR: EL PASEO WEST PROPERTIES, LLC A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY TRUSTEE: FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE COMPANY, A CORPORATION BENEFICIARY: FIRSTBANK ORGANIZED AND EXISTING UNDER THE LAWS OF COLORADO AFFECTS: THE LAND AND OTHER PROPERTY. 22. WATER RIGHTS, CLAIMS OR TITLE TO WATER, WHETHER OR NOT SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS. 23. RIGHTS OF PARTIES IN POSSESSION. 12 13 15 20 10 14 S E E T S H E E T 1 S E E T S H E E T 2 MATCHLINE - SEE SHEET 2 UTILITIES SHOWN ARE BASED ON VISIBLE FEATURES AND USA PAINT MARKOUT. NO POTHOLING WAS PERFORMED AND RECORD PLANS PROVIDED ARE INCOMPLETE. MARKOUT OF THE PRIVATE SEWER AND ASSOCATED IMPROVEMENTS ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE BUIDLING WAS INCOMPLETE, AND RECORD PLANS WERE NOT AVAILABLE. SEWER LINES EXIST THAT ARE NOT SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING. OTHER UTILITIES MAY EXIST THAT ARE NOT SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING. UTILITY NOTE: 1182 8''SS SSMH (244.48RIM)(244.05)(EG)(242.82)(EG)(243.47)(EG)(244.56)(EG)(244.97)(EG)(243.78)(EG)(242.67)(EG)(242.55)(EG)(243.58)(EG)(242.39)(EG)(243.30)(EG)(243.33)(EG)(242.30)(EG)(242.23)(EG)(242.18)(EG)(241.93)(EG)(241.80)(EG)(242.19)(EG)(242.94)(EG)(242.35)(EG)(242.25)(EG)(241.93)(EG)(243.08)(EG)(242.86)(EG)(242.92)(EG)(242.59)(EG)(243.41)(EG)(243.71)(EG)(244.76)(EG)(244.07)(EG)(244.07)(EG)(244.43)(EG)(244.50)(EG)(244.79)(EG)(245.66)(EG)(246.41)(EG)(245.73)(EG)(246.38)(EG)(246.43)(EG)(245.88)(EG)(246.47)(EG)(246.16)(EG)(246.22)(EG)(245.91)(EG)(245.27)(EG)(244.20)(EG)(245.93)(EG)(244.49)(EG)(242.73)(EG)(EG)(242.98)(EG)(245.62)(EG)(246.33)(EG)(246.05)(EG)(246.07)(EG)(246.31)(EG)SPEED BUMP (245)(244)(243)(2 4 5 )(245)(244)(243)(244)(243)(244)(243)(244)(245)(242)(2 4 3 ) (2 4 4 )(245)(24 6 )(244)(243)(245)8''SS SSMH (242.30RIM) (X-FRMR) (P5168509) 4 3 (ELEC. ROOM) (FACP) 2 3 WILDEST GREENS 1 FIRE RISER (ASPHALT) (ASPHALT) (ASPHALT) (ASPHALT) (ASPHALT) (ASPHALT) 8''SS 8''SS 8''SS 8''SS 8''SS 8''SS 8''SS 8''SS 8''SS 8''SS 8''SS 8''SS 8''SS 8''SS 8''SS 8''SS 8''SS 8''SS 8''SS 8''SS 8''SS 8''SS 8''SS 8''SS 8''SS 8''SS 8''SS 8''SS 8''SS 8''SS 8''SS 8''SS 8''SS 8''SS 8''SS 8''SS 8''SS 8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS(SEWER) (SEWER) (SEWER)(SEWER)(SEWER)(ELECTRICAL PER USA MARKOUT)(ELECTRICAL PER USA MARKOUT)(E L E C T R I C A L P E R U S A M A R K O U T )8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS(SEWER LATERAL)GGG(GAS PER USA MARKOUT)(GAS PER USA MARKOUT)(GAS)(SSCO)(SSCO)(SSCO)(ELECTRICAL PER USA MARKOUT)(ELECTRICAL PER USA MARKOUT)(TELECOM PER USA MARKOUT)8''SS8''SS8''SS(SEWER)(SEWER)(ELECTRICAL PER USA MARKOUT)(ELECTRICAL PER USA MARKOUT)(TELECOM PER USA MARKOUT)(TELECOM PER USA MARKOUT)(TELECOM PER USA MARKOUT)(E L E C T R I C A L P E R U S A M A R K O U T )(ELECTRICAL VAULT)(FF = 247.0) (FF = 247.0) ( 2 4 6 . 2 0 T C ) ( 2 4 5 . 3 4 F S ) ( 2 4 5 . 6 9 T C ) ( 2 4 5 . 3 2 F S ) ( 24 6 . 8 4T C ) (2 46 . 3 0 FS ) ( 2 4 6 . 2 2 T C ) ( 2 4 5 . 4 8 F S ) ( 2 4 7 . 0 4 T C ) ( 2 4 6 . 5 9 F S ) ( 2 4 5 . 1 6 T C ) ( 2 4 5 . 3 4 F S ) ( 2 4 7 . 0 2 T C ) ( 2 4 6 . 6 5 F S ) ( 2 4 6 . 0 3 T C ) ( 2 4 5 . 8 0 F S ) ( 2 4 7 . 0 0 T C ) ( 2 4 6 . 4 0 I N V ) ( C U R B D R A I N ) ( 2 4 7 . 0 0 T C ) ( 2 4 6 . 3 5 I N V ) ( C U R B D R A I N ) ( 2 D R A I N S ) ( 2 4 7 . 0 0 T C ) ( 2 4 6 . 4 5 I N V ) ( C U R B D R A I N ) ( 2 D R A I N S ) ( 2 4 7 . 0 0 T C ) ( 2 4 6 . 6 5 I N V ) ( C U R B D R A I N ) ( 2 D R A I N S ) (2 4 6 )(246)( 2 4 7 . 0 8 T C ) ( 2 4 6 . 6 0 I N V ) ( C U R B D R A I N ) ( 2 D R A I N S ) ( 2 4 6 . 5 0 I N V ) ( C U R B D R A I N ) ( 2 D R A I N S ) ( 2 4 6 . 9 8 T C ) ( 2 4 6 . 5 6 I N V ) ( C U R B D R A I N ) ( 2 D R A I N S ) ( 2 4 7 . 0 1 T C ) (EXISTING BUILDING) (EXISTING BUILDING) (CONCRETE) (CONCRETE)(CONCRETE)(CONCRETE)(CONCRETE)(CONCRETE)(CONCRETE)(CONCRETE)(CONCRETE)(CONCRETE)(GREASE)(TRAP)(SSCO)(SSCO)( 2 4 4 . 5 1 T C ) ( 2 4 4 . 2 7 F S ) ( 2 4 5 . 0 8 T C ) ( 2 4 4 . 6 0 F S ) ( 2 4 5 . 6 2 T C ) ( 2 4 5 . 0 8 F S ) ( 2 4 5 . 5 4 T C ) ( 2 4 5 . 9 5 F S ) ( 2 4 4 . 1 0 T C ) ( 2 4 3 . 9 0 F S ) ( 2 4 3 . 5 7 T C ) ( 2 4 3 . 3 5 F S )(PLANTER)(PLANTER) (SSCO)8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SSPAR C E L 3 PAR C E L 2 PAR C E L 1 10.00'15 14 14 14 14 6. 0 0 '136 . 0 0 ' 6. 0 0 '131 3 6 . 0 0 ' 1 3 PARCEL 5 10 10 10 (N00°29'20"W 270.00')(106.00')(76.00')(N89°30'40" E 1 5 6 . 0 0 ' )(N00°29'20"W 326.00')14 SSMH (244.48RIM) M(251.74)(EG)(251.28)(EG)(252.53)(EG)(252.44)(EG)(252.35)(EG)(252.70)(EG)(251.19)(EG)(250.98)(EG)(249.62)(EG)(249.73)(EG)(249.52)(EG)(248.17)(EG)(250.02)(EG)(251.74)(EG)(252.86)(EG)(251.38)(EG)(249.74)(EG)(252.85)(EG)(WTR) (VLV)(252.73)(EG)(252.85)(EG)(252.75)(EG)(WTR) (VLV)(249.28)(EG)(252.44)(EG)(248.49)(EG)(248.30)(EG)(248.77)(EG)(248.47)(EG)(248.09)(EG)(247.89)(EG)(248.04)(EG)(247.53)(EG)(247.70)(EG)(246.78)(EG)(247.19)(EG)(247.70)(EG)(247.30)(EG)(248.68)(EG)(248.32)(EG)(246.52)(EG)(246.92)(EG)(247.03)(EG)(246.23)(EG)(246.19)(EG)(245.84)(EG)(244.05)(EG)(242.82)(EG)(243.47)(EG)(244.56)(EG)(244.97)(EG)(243.78)(EG)(242.67)(EG)(242.55)(EG)(243.58)(EG)(242.39)(EG)(243.30)(EG)(243.33)(EG)(242.30)(EG)(242.23)(EG)(242.18)(EG)(241.93)(EG)(241.80)(EG)(242.19)(EG)(242.94)(EG)(242.35)(EG)(242.25)(EG)(241.93)(EG)(243.08)(EG)(242.86)(EG)(242.92)(EG)(242.59)(EG)(243.41)(EG)(243.71)(EG)(244.76)(EG)(244.07)(EG)(244.07)(EG)(244.43)(EG)(244.50)(EG)(244.79)(EG)(245.66)(EG)(246.41)(EG)(245.73)(EG)(246.38)(EG)(246.43)(EG)(245.88)(EG)(246.47)(EG)(246.16)(EG)(246.22)(EG)(245.91)(EG)(245.27)(EG)(244.20)(EG)(245.93)(EG)(244.49)(EG)(242.73)(EG)(242.34)(EG)(242.98)(EG)(245.62)(EG)(248.23)(EG)(248.42)(EG)(248.51)(EG)(247.66)(EG)(247.23)(EG)(246.76)(EG)(246.65)(EG)(246.33)(EG)(246.05)(EG)(246.07)(EG)(250.34)(EG)(249.50)(EG)(247.63)(EG)(247.95RIM) SSMH W (246.31)(EG)(247.15)(EG)(247.25)(EG)(247.27)(EG)(247.23)(EG)(TRASH ENCLOSURE)(250.28)(EG)(250.37)(EG)(250.36)(EG)(250.38)(EG)(250.34)(EG)(250.29)(EG)(250.22)(EG)(250.19)(EG)(250.08)(EG)(250.17)(EG)(250.23)(EG)(250.05)(EG)(249.16)(EG)(249.05)(EG)(247.89)(EG)(247.54)(EG)(248.52)(EG)(247.60)(EG)(246.97)(EG)(249.38)(EG)(246.49)(EG)(246.33)(EG)(245.95)(EG)(249.26)(EG)(248.71)(EG)(247.88)(EG)SPEED BUMP (25 2) (251)(250)(249)(250)(253 ) (25 3 ) (251) (250) (253) (253) (251) (250)(253)(252)(251)(250)(249)(248)(2 4 7 )(248)(248)(249)( 2 4 7 ) (2 4 6 ) (247) (2 46 ) (245 )(244)(243)(2 4 5 )(245)(244)(243)(244)(243)(244)(243)(244)(245)(242)(243) (244) (24 5) (246)(244)(243)(245)(TELCOM) SSMH (242.30RIM) (X-FRMR) (P5168509) 4 3 (ELEC. ROOM) (FACP) 2 3 WILDEST GREENS 1 FIRE RISER G (CONCRETE) (ASPHALT) (ASPHALT) (ASPHALT) (ASPHALT) (ASPHALT) (ASPHALT) (ASPHALT) (ASPHALT) (ASPHALT) (ASPHALT) (ASPHALT) (ASPHALT) (24" CML/CMC WATER MAIN) (8" CML/CMC WATER MAIN) 8''SS 8''SS 8''SS 8''SS 8''SS 8''SS 8''SS 8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS(SEWER)(SEWER)(SEWER) (S E W E R ) (SEWER ) (S E W E R ) (E L E C T R I C A L P E R U S A M A R K O U T )(ELECTRICAL PER USA MARKOUT)(ELECTRIC A L P E R U S A M A R K O U T )8''SS8''SS8''SS(SEWE R L A T E R A L)GGGG (TELE-MH) (SSCO) (G A S P E R U S A M ARKOU T ) (G A S P ER US A M A R K O U T ) (GAS) (S S CO) (S S CO) (SSCO) (E L E C T RICAL P E R U S A M A R K O U T )(ELEC T R I C A L P E R U S A MARKO U T ) (E L E C T R I C A L P E R USA M A R K O U T ) (TEL E C O M PER U S A M ARK O U T ) (ELECTRICAL PER USA MARKOUT) (ELECTRICAL PER USA MARKOUT) (TELECOM PER US A M A R K O U T )(TEL E C O M P E R U S A MA R K O U T ) (G A S P E R U S A MARK O U T ) (SEWER) (S E W E R ) (E L E C T R I C A L P E R U S A M A R K O U T ) (ELECT R I C A L P E R U S A M A RKOUT)(TEL E C O M P E R U S A MA R K O U T )(TELE C O M PER U S A MAR K O U T ) (TEL E C O M PER U S A M ARK O U T ) (T E L ECO M P E R USA M A R K OUT) (E L E C T R I C A L P E R U S A M A R K O U T ) (E L E C T R I C A L VAULT ) (FF = 247.0) (FF = 247.0) ( 2 4 6 . 8 8 T C ) ( 2 4 6 . 3 1 F S ) (2 4 7 . 0 0 T C ) (2 4 6 . 5 6 F S ) (2 4 6 . 2 0 T C ) (2 4 5 . 3 4 F S ) (2 4 5 . 6 9 T C ) (2 4 5 . 3 2 F S ) (246. 8 4 T C ) (246.3 0 F S ) (2 4 9 . 9 9 T C ) ( 2 4 9 . 5 1 F S ) ( 2 4 9 . 7 0 T C ) ( 2 4 9 . 3 5 F S ) (2 4 8 . 7 2 T C ) (2 4 8 . 0 0 F S ) (2 4 8 . 1 5 T C ) (2 4 7 . 8 0 F S ) (2 4 7 . 0 3 T C ) ( 2 4 6 . 9 3 F S ) (2 4 9 . 8 2 T C ) (2 4 9 . 4 5 F S ) (2 4 9 . 8 2 T C ) (2 4 9 . 4 5 F S ) ( 2 5 1 . 4 9 T C ) (2 5 0 . 8 9 F S ) ( 2 4 6 . 2 2 T C ) (2 4 5 . 4 8 F S ) (2 4 7 . 0 4 T C ) ( 2 4 6 . 5 9 F S ) (2 4 5 . 1 6 T C ) ( 2 4 5 . 3 4 F S ) ( 2 4 7 . 0 2 T C ) (2 4 6 . 6 5 F S ) (2 4 6 . 0 3 T C ) ( 2 4 5 . 8 0 F S ) ( 2 4 8 . 1 9 T C ) (2 4 7 . 8 4 F S ) ( 2 4 8 . 9 1 T C ) (2 4 8 . 6 0 F S ) ( 2 4 8 . 1 2 T C ) (2 4 7 . 7 6 F S ) ( 2 4 6 . 8 6 T C ) (2 4 6 . 4 1 F S ) (2 4 6 . 9 6 T C ) (2 4 6 . 5 3 I N V ) (C U R B D R A I N ) ( 2 4 7 . 0 5 T C ) ( 2 4 6 . 7 6 F S ) ( 2 4 6 . 5 1 T C ) (2 4 6 . 1 2 F S ) (2 4 7 . 0 0 T C ) ( 2 4 6 . 4 0 I N V ) ( C U R B D R A I N ) (2 D R A I N S ) ( 2 D R A I N S ) (2 4 7 . 0 0 T C ) (2 4 6 . 3 5 I N V ) (C U R B D R A I N ) (2 D R A I N S ) (2 4 7 . 0 0 T C ) ( 2 4 6 . 4 5 I N V ) ( C U R B D R A I N ) ( 2 D R A I N S ) ( 2 4 7 . 0 0 T C ) ( 2 4 6 . 6 5 I N V ) (C U R B D R A I N ) (2 D R A I N S ) (2 4 6 )(246)(2 4 7 . 0 8 T C ) (2 4 6 . 6 0 I N V ) (C U R B D R A I N ) (2 D R A I N S ) (2 4 6 . 5 0 I N V ) (C U R B D R A I N ) ( 2 D R A I N S ) ( 2 4 6 . 9 8 T C ) (2 4 6 . 5 6 I N V ) ( C U R B D R A I N ) ( 2 D R A I N S ) (2 4 7 . 0 1 T C ) (EXISTING BUILDING) (EXISTING BUILDING) (CONCRETE) (CONCRETE) (CONCRETE) (CONCRETE) (C O N C R E TE) (C O N C R E T E ) (C O N CRETE)(CONCR E T E ) (C O N C R E T E ) (CONCRE T E ) (C O N C R E T E )(CONCR E T E ) (G R E A S E ) (T R A P ) (S S C O )(SSCO ) ( 2 4 4 . 5 1 T C ) (2 4 4 . 2 7 F S ) ( 2 4 5 . 0 8 T C ) (2 4 4 . 6 0 F S ) (2 4 5 . 6 2 T C ) ( 2 4 5 . 0 8 F S ) ( 2 4 9 . 5 3 T C ) (2 4 8 . 9 9 F S ) ( 2 4 7 . 9 8 T C ) ( 2 4 7 . 6 0 F S ) (2 5 0 . 0 5 T C ) (2 4 9 . 6 1 F S ) ( 2 4 9 . 8 0 T C ) (2 4 9 . 4 2 F S ) (2 4 8 . 9 9 T C ) (2 4 8 . 5 5 F S ) ( 2 4 5 . 5 4 T C ) (2 4 5 . 9 5 F S ) (2 4 4 . 1 0 T C ) (2 4 3 . 9 0 F S ) (2 4 3 . 5 7 T C ) ( 2 4 3 . 3 5 F S ) (PLANTER) (P L A N T E R ) (PLANTER) (SSCO)8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SSPAR C E L 4 PAR C E L 3 PAR C E L 2 PAR C E L 1 10.00'15 10.00'15 20 20 20 14 14 14 14 14 14 6. 0 0 ' 13 6. 0 0 ' 6. 0 0 ' 13 13 6. 0 0 ' 13 PARCEL 5 EL PASEO 20 . 0 0 ' 12 20 . 0 0 ' 12 20 . 0 0 ' 12 10 10 10 10 10 (N00°2 9 ' 2 0 " W 2 7 0 . 0 0 ' ) (1 0 6 . 0 0 ' ) (7 6 . 0 0 ' ) (N89°30'40"E 156.00') (N 0 0 ° 2 9 ' 2 0 " W 326 . 0 0 ' ) (N89°30'40"E 123.00') (N 0 0 ° 2 9 ' 20"W 5 6 . 0 0 ' ) (N89°30'40"E 33.00') (8 8 . 0 0 ' ) 14 UNDER REVIEW UNDER REVIEW 2 72990 EL PASEO, PALM DESERT, CA, 92260 LOT 5 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 14710 (PMB 83/22-23) BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY EXHIBIT IN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA SURVEY EXHIBIT 10 5 10 20 30 SCALE: 1"=10' 0 SCALE: 1"=40'MATCHLINE - SEE SHEET 1 RECORD DATA: () DENOTES RECORD DATA PER PARCEL MAP NO. 14710 (PMB 83/22-23) & MEASURED. PREPARED FOR: EL PASEO WEST PROPERTIES, LLC. C/O MATT JOHNSON 72000 MAGNESIA FALLS DR, STE 4 RANCHO MIRAGE, CA 92270 APN PROPERTY ADDRESS: 72990 EL PASEO PALM DESERT, CA 92260 640-170-013 KEY MAP S E E T S H E E T 1 S E E T S H E E T 2 EASEMENTS: 1. ANY DEFECT, LIEN, ENCUMBRANCE, ADVERSE CLAIM, OR OTHER MATTER THAT APPEARS FOR THE FIRST TIME IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OR IS CREATED, ATTACHES, OR IS DISCLOSED BETWEEN THE COMMITMENT DATE AND THE DATE ON WHICH ALL OF THE SCHEDULE B, PART I-REQUIREMENTS ARE MET. 2. (A) TAXES OR ASSESSMENTS THAT ARE NOT SHOWN AS EXISTING LIENS BY THE RECORDS OF ANY TAXING AUTHORITYTHAT LEVIES TAXES OR ASSESSMENTS ON REAL PROPERTY OR BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS; (B) PROCEEDINGS BY A PUBLIC AGENCY THAT MAY RESULT IN TAXES OR ASSESSMENTS, OR NOTICES OF SUCH PROCEEDINGS, WHETHER OR NOT SHOWN BY THE RECORDS OF SUCH AGENCY OR BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS. 3. ANY FACTS, RIGHTS, INTERESTS, OR CLAIMS THAT ARE NOT SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS BUT THAT COULD BE ASCERTAINED BY AN INSPECTION OF THE LAND OR THAT MAY BE ASSERTED BY PERSONS IN POSSESSION OF THE LAND. 4. EASEMENTS, LIENS OR ENCUMBRANCES, OR CLAIMS THEREOF, NOT SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS. 5. ANY ENCROACHMENT, ENCUMBRANCE, VIOLATION, VARIATION, OR ADVERSE CIRCUMSTANCE AFFECTING THE TITLE THAT WOULD BE DISCLOSED BY AN ACCURATE AND COMPLETE LAND SURVEY OF THE LAND AND NOT SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS. 6. (A) UNPATENTED MINING CLAIMS; (B) RESERVATIONS OR EXCEPTIONS IN PATENTS OR IN ACTS AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE THEREOF; (C) WATER RIGHTS, CLAIMS OR TITLE TO WATER, WHETHER OR NOT THE MATTERS EXCEPTED UNDER (A), (B), OR (C) ARE SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS. 7. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND ASSESSMENTS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2020-2021, A LIEN NOT YET DUE OR PAYABLE. 8. THE LAND LIES WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF PROPOSED COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1, AS DISCLOSED BY A MAP FILED JANUARY 05, 1990 IN BOOK 28, PAGE 75 OF MAPS OF ASSESSMENT AND COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICTS. 9. THE LIEN OF SUPPLEMENTAL TAXES, IF ANY, ASSESSED PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 3.5 COMMENCING WITH SECTION 75 OF THE CALIFORNIA REVENUE AND TAXATION CODE. 10. AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITIES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, RECORDED NOVEMBER 26, 1928 IN BOOK 790 OF DEEDS, PAGE 402. IN FAVOR OF: SOUTHERN SIERRAS POWER COMPANY AFFECTS: AS DESCRIBED THEREIN 11. AN EASEMENT FOR UTILITY AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, RECORDED MAY 11, 1951 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 20201 IN BOOK 1270, PAGE 339 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. IN FAVOR OF: CALIFORNIA ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY AFFECTS: AS DESCRIBED THEREIN THE LOCATION OF THE EASEMENT CANNOT BE DETERMINED FROM RECORD INFORMATION. 12. AN EASEMENT FOR UTILITY AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, RECORDED SEPTEMBER 17, 1958 AS BOOK 2333, PAGE 569 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. IN FAVOR OF: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY AFFECTS: AS DESCRIBED THEREIN THE LOCATION OF THE EASEMENT CANNOT BE DETERMINED FROM RECORD INFORMATION. 13. AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITIES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, RECORDED MAY 14, 1979 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 98333 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. IN FAVOR OF: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY, A CORPORATION AFFECTS: AS DESCRIBED THEREIN 14. THE TERMS, PROVISIONS AND EASEMENT(S) CONTAINED IN THE DOCUMENT ENTITLED DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIONS AND GRANT OF EASEMENTS RECORDED OCTOBER 16, 1979 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 219707 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. 15. AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, RECORDED DECEMBER 11, 1979 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 263220 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. IN FAVOR OF: CAL-AMERICAN INCOME PROPERTY FUND, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY, AN OREGON CORPORATION; HWS PALM DESERT, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; AND CLARE BUILDERS, INC., A CORPORATION AFFECTS: AS DESCRIBED THEREIN 16. A DEED OF TRUST TO SECURE AN ORIGINAL INDEBTEDNESS OF $2,842,000.00 RECORDED JUNE 14, 1989 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 195347 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. DATED: JUNE 13, 1989 TRUSTOR: RPM INVESTMENTS INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION ("RPM"), AMERICAN DEFERRED EXCHANGE CORP., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION ("ADEC"), AND FRANK OEHLBAUM, AS TRUSTEE OF THE FRANK OEHLBAUM TRUST DATED NOVEMBER 9, 1988 TRUSTEE: COLUMBIA FINANCIAL CORPORATION, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION BENEFICIARY: COLUMBIA SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION AFFECTS: THE LAND AND OTHER PROPERTY. A DOCUMENT ENTITLED "TENANT LEASE ASSIGNMENT" RECORDED JUNE 14, 1989 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 195348 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, AS ADDITIONAL SECURITY FOR THE PAYMENT OF THE INDEBTEDNESS SECURED BY THE DEED OF TRUST. 17. A DEED OF TRUST TO SECURE AN ORIGINAL INDEBTEDNESS OF $2,800,000.00 RECORDED OCTOBER 23, 1989 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 367501 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. DATED: OCTOBER 10, 1989 TRUSTOR: FRANK OEHLBAUM, AS TRUSTEE OF THE FRANK OEHLBAUM TRUST DATED NOVEMBER 9, 1988, AN UNDIVIDED 13.5% INTEREST; WILSHIRE-ALEXANDRIA CO., A CALIFORNIA GENERAL PARTNERSHIP, AN UNDIVIDED 36.5% INTEREST; BRANDT AND BRANDT, A PARTNERSHIP, A CALIFORNIA GENERAL PARTNERSHIP, AN UNDIVIDED 50% INTEREST TRUSTEE: FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY BENEFICIARY: THE CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY AFFECTS: THE LAND AND OTHER PROPERTY. A DOCUMENT ENTITLED "ABSOLUTE ASSIGNMENT OF LEASES AND RENTS" RECORDED OCTOBER 23, 1989 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 367502 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, AS ADDITIONAL SECURITY FOR THE PAYMENT OF THE INDEBTEDNESS SECURED BY THE DEED OF TRUST. A DOCUMENT RECORDED JULY 22, 1994 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 291854 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS PROVIDES THAT THE DEED OF TRUST OR THE OBLIGATION SECURED THEREBY HAS BEEN MODIFIED. 18. THE TERMS AND PROVISIONS CONTAINED IN THE DOCUMENT ENTITLED "RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT" RECORDED AUGUST 06, 2003 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2003-597460 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. 19. AN EASEMENT FOR PRESERVING AND MAINTAINING THE EXTERIOR APPEARANCE OF THE PROPERTY AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, RECORDED MARCH 20, 2008 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 08-138234 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. IN FAVOR OF: CITY OF PALM DESERT, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AFFECTS: AS DESCRIBED THEREIN (BLANKET IN NATURE - APPEARS TO BE EXPIRED) 20. THE TERMS AND PROVISIONS CONTAINED IN THE DOCUMENT ENTITLED MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT, EXECUTED BY AND BETWEEN 20 EL PASEO, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AND FRESH & EASY NEIGHBORHOOD MARKET, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, RECORDED APRIL 21, 2008, AS INSTRUMENT NO. INSTRUMENT NO. 08-196564 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. (OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE IS REVIEWING THIS ITEM WITH TITLE FOR POSSIBLE REMOVAL) 21. A DEED OF TRUST TO SECURE AN ORIGINAL INDEBTEDNESS OF $1,980,000.00 RECORDED DECEMBER 15, 2011 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2011-0556148 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. DATED: DECEMBER 13, 2011 TRUSTOR: EL PASEO WEST PROPERTIES, LLC A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY TRUSTEE: FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE COMPANY, A CORPORATION BENEFICIARY: FIRSTBANK ORGANIZED AND EXISTING UNDER THE LAWS OF COLORADO AFFECTS: THE LAND AND OTHER PROPERTY. 22. WATER RIGHTS, CLAIMS OR TITLE TO WATER, WHETHER OR NOT SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS. 23. RIGHTS OF PARTIES IN POSSESSION. 12 13 15 20 10 14 2 NO. 8756BENJAMIN DANIEL EGA N PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR STA TE OF CALIFORNIAPO BOX 5282, LA QUINTA, CA 92248-5282EGAN CIVIL, INC.(760) 404-7663 WWW.EGANCIVIL.COMHV-11350.00CU R B A N D SI D E W A L K AW N I N G BUILDINGEDGE OF DIRTED G E O F A S P H .EDGE OF CONC.CONTROL1350.00V-1FIRE HYDRANTPOOLROADSTRIPESPARKINGGUARD RAILWALLRE T A I N I N G FENCEPoolPSTANDPIPEMA N H O L E PIPE LINECATCH BASINVA L V E TA N K DR O P I N L E T VA U L T RAILROADRAIL SIGNALIN T E R C O N T O U R POWER POLEST R E E T L I G H T PO W E R P O L E W /STREET LIGHTMI S C E L L A N E O U SSINGLE TREEINDEX CONTOURTRAFFIC SIGNALGUY WIRESPMHPALMTR E E S SI G N 13401350SYMBOL LEGEND:WALLGUTTERST R I P I N G ROADWAYSBARRIERSPAVEMENT MARKINGSAND SIGNAGERAILROAD AND TRANSITUTILITY (WET)UTILITY (DRY)LANDSCAPINGAND TERRAINPP PPABBREVIATIONS:C/L CENTERLINECOR. CORNERE EASTEG EXISTING GROUNDFL FLOW LINEFS FINISH SURFACEGPS GLOBAL POS. SYSTEMHYD. FIRE HYDRANTIP IRON PIPEMB MAP BOOKMON. MONUMENTN NORTHREF. REFERENCER/W RIGHT-OF-WAYRS RECORD OF SURVEYPMB PARCEL MAP BOOKS SOUTHSEC. SECTIONSD M H S T O R M D R A I N M A N H O L E SS M H S A N . S E W E R M A N H O L E TC T O P O F C U R B TCOL TOP OF COLUMNTW TOP OF WALLVLV. VALVEW WESTWM WATER METER(XX.XX) EXISTING ELEVATION CALLOUTBENCHMARK:BASIS OF BEARINGS:INDICATES FOUND 3/4" IRON PIPE WITH PLASTIC PLUG STAMPED"LS 4146", PER PMB 83/22-23BE N C H M A R K : PD # 1 3 9 ELEVATION: 245.597 DATUM: NAVD88DE S C R I P T I O N : 2" B R A S S D I S K S E T F L U S H I N T O P O F C A T C H B A S I N O N W E S T E R L Y S I D E OF H I G H W A Y 7 4 , 1 7 6 F T N O R T H E R L Y O F E C R O F E L P A S E O , 3 . 8 F T W E S T O F C F .BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE OF PARCEL 2, ASSHOWN BY A MAP ON FILE IN PARCEL MAP BOOK 83, PAGES 22 THROUGH 23 INCLUSIVE OFMAPS, RECORDS OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BEING: NORTH89°30'40" EAST.BOUNDARY & TOPOGRAPHICSURVEY EXHIBITLOT 5 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 14710 (PMB 83/22-23)72990 EL PASEO, PALM DESERT, CA 92260 EL PASEO WEST PROPERTIES, LLCDISCLAIMER: I N F O R M A T I O N S H O W N I S C O M P I L E D S T R I C T L Y FR O M T H E F I E L D S U R V E Y , F I R S T A M E R I C A N T I T L E I N S U R A N C E CO M P A N Y N O . N C S - 1 0 3 0 6 3 8 - O N T 1 D A T E D 9 / 1 1 / 2 0 2 0 A N D PUBLIC RECORDS LIMITED TO OFFICIAL MAPS FILED IN THECOUNTY SURVEYORS OFFICE. THE ABOVE MENTIONED SOURCESARE THE BASIS FOR ALL CONSTRAINTS PLOTTED HEREON. THISMAY NOT BE EXHAUSTIVE AND ADDITIONAL CONSTRAINTS MAYEXIST WHICH ARE NOT DISCLOSED IN THE ABOVE. THE CLIENTIS ADVISED TO CONTACT THE CITY FOR ADDITIONALINFORMATION ON BUILDING DESIGN REGULATIONS.SURVEY NOTES:1" = 10' 20200499 MARCH 04, 2024 JO/HA TE/BDE 20200499 SHEETS FILE NO. OF S H E E T JOB NUMBER SCALE DATE FOR:DATE:P.L.S. 8756BE N J A M I N D A N I E L E G A N , P E , P L SDATE BY DESCRIPTION APP'D DATER E V I S I O N SFIELD CREW MAPPING 03/04/2024THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED IN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PARCEL A: PARCEL 5 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 14710, IN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 83, PAGES 22 AND 23 OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. PARCEL B: A NON-EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT FOR PEDESTRIAN, AUTOMOTIVE, INGRESS, EGRESS AND PARKING, AS CONTAINED IN THE DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIONS AND GRANT OF EASEMENTS RECORDED OCTOBER 16, 1979 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 219707 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. LEGAL DESCRIPTION:MONTEREY AVEHI GH W A Y 1 11 PLAZA WAYEL PASEO HIG H W A Y 7 4 NO T T O S C A L E VICINITY MAP SITEPALM DESERTUTILITIES SHOWN ARE BASED ON VISIBLE FEATURES AND USA PAINT MARKOUT. NO POTHOLING WAS PERFORMED AND RECORD PLANS PROVIDED ARE INCOMPLETE. MARKOUT OF THE PRIVATE SEWER AND ASSOCATED IMPROVEMENTS ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE BUIDLING WAS INCOMPLETE, AND RECORD PLANS WERE NOT AVAILABLE. SEWER LINES EXIST THAT ARE NOT SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING. OTHER UTILITIES MAY EXIST THAT ARE NOT SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING. UTILITY NOTE: DATE OF FIELD SURVEY: 09/10/2020 & 09/23/2020 & 12/12/2023 EXHIBIT UPDATED: 03/04/2024 1183 8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS 8''SS 8''SS 8''SS 8''SS 8''SS 8''SS 8''SS 8''SS (E)(E)(E)(E)EXISTING RESTAURANT 9,728 SF F.F.±247'-0" (E) (E) D2 D2 D2 D2 D2 D6 D6 D3 D5 D4 D4 D9 D9 D9 D8 D8 (E) ADA PARKINGEL PASEO10 11 12 13 REMAIN DEMO DEMO (E) PATH OF TRAVEL (E) PATH OF TRAVEL EXISTING19'-1012"EXISTING27'-412"EXISTING17'-1012"(E) RAMP (E) STORAGE (E) ELECT. ROOM28'-4 14 " EXISTINGCURB TO CURB4'-1012"EXISTING6'-9"6'-812"5'-9" 5'-41 2"6'-012"28'-5 14"EXISTINGCURB TO CURB153'-7" EXISTING REMAIN D4 PROPERTY LINE 270' PROPERTY LINE 326' PROPERTY LINE 56'PROPERTY LINE123'PROPERTY LINE156'PROPERTY LINE33'10'-0"D2 D2 34'-0"BUILDING TO BUILDING(E)TRASH LOCATION D2 D2 D7 D7 D10 D6 D6 D11 D1 D1 D1 (E)FIRE RISER ROOM D12 D12 DEMO REMAIN D2 AREA TO DE DISTURBED 4,629.5 S.F. D13 (E)GREASE TRAP LOCATION 1/16" - 1'-0" OVERALL E.SITE PLAN FEBRUARY.29.2024 Sheet: Date: Scale: PATIO REMODEL FOR WILDEST RESTAURANT 72990 EL PASEO #3 PALM DESERT CA,. 92260 z a y d a @ z b r a u n d e s i g n s . c o m 7 6 0 . 8 9 8 . 4 8 6 5 w w w . Z b r a u n d e s i g n s . c o m D E S I G N S A-1.10 ACCESSIBILITY STATEMENT ACCESSIBLE ROUTES OF TRAVEL HAVE BEEN PROVIDED BETWEEN ALL BUILDINGS, ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCES TO THE SITE, IN ACCORDANCE WITH C.B.C. CHAPTER 11 AND CALIFORNIA TITLE 24. PATH OF TRAVEL AS INDICATED IS BARRIER-FREE ACCESS WITHOUT ANY ABRUPT VERTICAL CHANGES EXCEEDING 1/2" AT 1:2 MAX. SLOPE, EXCEPT THAT LEVEL CHANGE DOES NOT EXCEED 1/4" VERTICAL. ALL STAMPED CONCRETE SURFACES SHALL COMPLY WITH H/C REQUIREMENTS FOR JOINT WIDTH & DEPTH. FILL ALL JOINTS W/ GROUT/MORTAR IF NECESSARY. ACCESSIBILITY NOTES 1.AT EVERY PRIMARY PUBLIC ENTRANCE, AND AT EVERY MAJOR FUNCTION AREA, ALONG OR LEADING TO AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE OF TRAVEL, THERE IS TO BE A SIGN DISPLAYING THE INTERNATIONAL SYMBOL OF ACCESSIBILITY. SIGNS ARE REQUIRED TO INDICATE THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL TO ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCES AND FACILITIES. 2.ALL WALKS SHALL BE LESS THAN 1:20 (5%) MAX SLOPE UNLESS DESIGNATED AS A RAMP. 3.ANY AND ALL ABRUBT LEVEL CHANGES IN WALKS OR HARDSCAPE ALONG AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE SHALL BE LESS THAN OR EQUAL TO 1/2". IF LEVEL CHANGES ARE GREATER THAN 1/2" THEY MUST COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF CURB RAMPS. 4.ANY OBSTRUCTION THAT OVERHANG A PEDESTRIAN WAY SHALL BE A MIN. OF 80" ABOVE THE WALKING SURFACE AS MEASURED FROM THE BOTTOM OF THE OBSTRUCTION PER CBC SECTION 11B-307 5.REFER TO CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR EXACT LOCATION OF BUILDING PADS, PROPERTY LINES, EXISTING STRUCTURE LOCATIONS, EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS, ETC.. 6.SITE LAYOUT AS SHOWN IS ARCHITECTS INTENT. NOTIFY ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY OF ANY CONFLICTS IN FIELD PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION. 7. PEDESTRIANS SHALL BE PROTECTED DURING CONSTRUCTION, REMODELING AND DEMOLITION ACTIVITIES AS REQUIRED BY CBC CHAPTER 33 AND TABLE 3306.1. SIGNS SHALL BE PROVIDED TO DIRECT PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC. 8. PROVIDE DIRECTIONAL SIGNAGE TO ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE PER 2013 CBC SECT: 11B-216 COORDINATE WITH BUILDING INSPECTOR AT SITE. 1/16"-1'-0" EXISTING SITE PLAN DEMO KEYNOTES EXISTING CURB TO REMAIN. EXISTING CURB TO BE REMOVED. EXISTING ASPHALT TO BE REMOVED, COMPACT SOIL TO RECEIVE NEW SURFACE MATERIAL, REFER TO GRADING PLANS FOR REQUIRED SLOPES AND ELEVATIONS. EXISTING CONCRETE WALL TO BE REMOVED. EXISTING CONCRETE PAD TO BE REMOVED. EXISTING SIDEWALK TO BE REMOVED TO EDGE OF BUILDING. EXISTING PLANTER TO REMAIN. EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED. EXISTING STEEL POST TO BE REMOVED. EXISTING RAMP TO BE REMOVED. EXISTING STORAGE STRUCTURE, CMU BLOCK AND METAL DOORS TO BE REMOVED. EXISTING LIGHT POLE AND FIXTURE TO REMAIN EXISTING COMMUNICATION POLE TO REMAIN IN PLACE D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7 D8 D9 D10 D11 DEMO NOTES 1.IT IS RESPONSIBILITY OF G.C. TO FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS 2.THE DEMOLITION PLANS ARE DERIVED FROM EXISTING BUILDING PLANS AND ARE INTENDED TO REASONABLY REPRESENT EXISTING CONDITIONS. THE DEMOLITION KEYNOTES IDENTIFY SPECIFIC AREAS OF WORK BUT MAY NO BE COMPLETE IN THE IDENTIFICATION OF ALL REMOVALS. IT IS RESPONSIBILITY OF G.C. TO FIELD VERIFY THE ACTUAL CONDITIONS AND COORDINATE DISCREPANCIES WITH ARCHITECT. 3.COORDINATE AND VERIFY WITH OWNER/ LANDLORD ALL ITEMS TO BE SALVAGE. 4.ALL INTERIOR SPACES TO BE STRIPPED AND CLEAR TO RECEIVE NEW FINISHES. PATCH, CLEAN AND PREPARED REMAINING WALLS AND CEILINGS TO RECEIVE NEW FINISHES WHERE NECESSARY. 5.ALL CONSTRUCTION DEBRI AS A RESULT OF DEMOLITION SHALL BE REMOVED FROM SITE AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. DO NOT ACCUMULATE DEBRI ON THE FLOOR OR SITE. 6.THE ARCHITECT HAS NO KNOWLEDGE OF AND SHALL NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY ASBESTOS OR OTHER HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ON JOBSITE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY ISOLATE THE AFFECTED AREA IS ASBESTOS OR OTHER HAZARDOUS MATERIAL ARE DISCOVERED DURING CONSTRUCTION. NOTIFY OWNER FOR FURTHER INSTRUCTION BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH OTHER WORK. 7.IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF G.C. TO COMPLY WITH ALL STANDARD LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL SAFETY REQUIREMENTS FOR DEMOLITION. D12 D13 1184 BUILDING 1APN: 640-170-013AREA: 9,728 S.F.BUILDING 4APN: 640-170-010AREA: 5,687 S.F.BUILDING 3APN: 640-170-011AREA: 4,224 S.F.BUILDING 2APN: 640-170-012AREA: 8,000 S.F.BUILDING 5APN: 640-170-009AREA: 9,933 S.F.010203040506070809101112131415161718192022232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849525354555657585960616263666768697071728384878685919293949596979899100101102103104105113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127135136140141142143144145146147148150151158159160161162163737475767782811061071081091281291301311491521531541641651662150516564798089901111121331341381391571567888110132137155CODES:PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL CODE. TITLE 25 ZONING; CHAPTER25.46 OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING.25.46.080 JOINT USE PARKING: DUAL USE OF PARKING MAY BE ALLOWEDWHERE THE OPERATING HOURS OF THE USES INVOLVED DO NOTOVERLAP. JOINT USE OF PARKING SHALL NO EXCEED 50 PORCENT OF THEREQUIRED SPACES OF ANY USES INVOLVED. THE AGREEMENT FOR THEJOINT USE SHALL BE IN THE FORM OF A RECORDED COVENANT ANDSHALL BE ACCEPTABLE TO THE CITY ATTORNEY. THE APPROVAL FOR THEJOINT USE CAN BE GRANTED ONLY BY THE COMMISION AND SHALLAPPLY EXCLUSIVELY TO THE C-1 AND OP ZONING DISTRICTS. ( ORD.1259 §1,2013).BLDG BANKRESTAURANTRETAILAPROX.BLDG AREABLDG 19,7284,8644,864BLDG 28,0004,0004,000BLDG 34,2244,224BLDG 45,6845,684BLDG 59,9339,933TOTAL4,00010,54823,021PARKING REQUIREMENTS PER CITY OF PALM DESERTORDINANCE 25.46.040 TABLE 25.46.1RETAIL/ BANK 3 PER 1,000 S.F.RESTAURANT 8 PER 1,000 S.F.PARKING CALCULATIONSUSE AREAPARKING REQUIREMENTSRETAIL/BANK27,021 S.F.81RESTAURANT10,548 S.F.85NEW PATIO2,977 S.F.24TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED190EXISTING SPACES 166PARKING SPACES TO BE REMOVED5PARKING SPACES TO BE ADDED 5NEW SPACES PROVIDED 166STREET PARKING SPACES REQUIRED24OWNER IS UTILIZING 25% ON PATIO SPACE FOR STORAGECONTAINER AND CIRCULATION AREAS.USABLE PATIO AREA2,233 S.F.18TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED184EXISTING SPACES 166PARKING SPACES TO BE REMOVED5PARKING SPACES TO BE ADDED 5NEW SPACES PROVIDED 166STREET PARKING SPACES REQUIRED18USABLE PATIO AREA 2,233 S.F.PROPOSE PATIO OPERATING HOURSBRUNCH9:00 AM - 1:30 PM WEEKENDS ONLYDINNER4:30 PM - 10:00 PM TUE-SUNOTHER OPERATING HOURS9:00 AM - 6:00 PM MON-SUN RETAIL9:00 AM - 5:00 PM MON-FRI BANK10:00 AM - 9:00 PM MON-SUN SHOE CITY BLDG. 5SHARE PARKING AT DINNER HOURS:50% RETAIL/BANK = 51/2 = 25.5 ≈ 26 SPACES(EXCLUDING SHOE CITY BUILDING)26 SPACES EXCEEDS THE 18 SPACES OF STREET PARKINGREQUIRED AT 100% CAPACITY OF PATIO USAGE.SHARED PARKING DURING WEEKEND HOURS50% BANK = 12/2 = 6 SPACES6 SPACES IS LESS THAN 18 STREET PARKING REQUIREMENTS AT100% OF PATIO USAGE. THEREFORE 12 STREET PARKING SPACESARE REQUIRED ON WEEKENDS DURING BRUNCH HOURS.FEBRUARY.29.2024Sheet:Date:Scale:PATIO REMODELFORWILDEST RESTAURANT72990 EL PASEO #3PALM DESERT CA,.92260z a y d a @ z b r a u n d e s i g n s . c o m7 6 0 . 8 9 8 . 4 8 6 5w w w . Z b r a u n d e s i g n s . c o mD E S I G N SPARKINGCOUNTA-1.201185 EXISTING RESTAURANT 9,728 SF F.F.±247'-0" (E) ADA PARKINGEL PASEO(E) PATH OF TRAVEL (E) PATH OF TRAVEL EXISTING19'-1012"EXISTING27'-412"EXISTING17'-1012"(E) RAMP (E) ELECT. ROOM 4'-1012"EXISTING6'-9"6'-812"5'-9" 5'-41 2" PROPERTY LINE 270' PROPERTY LINE 326' PROPERTY LINE 56'PROPERTY LINE123'PROPERTY LINE156'PROPERTY LINE33'(E)FIRE RISER ROOM PROPOSED TRASH ENCLOSURE 8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS 8''SS 8''SS 8''SS 8''SS 8''SS 8''SS 8''SS 8''SS PLANTER01 02 03 04 20'X40' PERGOLA 8'X40' CONTAINER 1 A-1.23 EL PASEO(E)GREASE TRAP 2 A-1.23 PLANTER 2 A-1.23 05 PLANTER NEW PATH OF TRAVEL NEW PATH OF TRAVEL NEW PATH OF TRAVEL NEW RAMP NEW PATH OF TRAVEL 18'-0"5'-012"CLEAR 7'-11"EXISTING ±84'-2" EXISTING 7'-9"EXISTING27'-10" EXISTING 19'-61 2" EXISTING 34'-71 2"9'-6" 45'-0" NEW PARKING10'-0"8'-5"8'-7"9'-6"9'-0" TYP.4'-0"6'-0"4'-0"2'-111 2"4'-0"4'-5"4'-0"7'-7"34'-0"(E) BLDG. TO BLDG.25'-10"NEW CURB TO CURB18'-0"25'-7"NEW CURB TO CURB25'-212"NEW CURB TO CURB28'-412"EXISTING CURB TO CURB25'-4"NEW CURB TO CURB(N) PATIO 2,977 SF 5'-0"(N) ADA PARKING 5'-0" CLEAR 25'-2"NEW TRASH ENCLOSURETO CURB1/16" - 1'-0" OVERALL NEW SITE PLAN FEBRUARY.29.2024 Sheet: Date: Scale: PATIO REMODEL FOR WILDEST RESTAURANT 72990 EL PASEO #3 PALM DESERT CA,. 92260 z a y d a @ z b r a u n d e s i g n s . c o m 7 6 0 . 8 9 8 . 4 8 6 5 w w w . Z b r a u n d e s i g n s . c o m D E S I G N S A-1.21 PARKING NOTES MARKING REQUIREMENTS. ALL OPEN PARKING STALLS SHALL BE CLEARLY OUTLINED WITH A MINIMUM 4-INCH WIDE DOUBLE (“HAIRPIN”) LINES ON THE SURFACE OF THE PARKING FACILITY. 25.46.080 JOINT USE PARKING DUAL USE OF PARKING MAY BE ALLOWED WHERE THE OPERATING HOURS OF THE USES INVOLVED DO NOT OVERLAP. JOINT USE OF PARKING SHALL NOT EXCEED 50 PERCENT OF THE REQUIRED SPACES OF ANY USES INVOLVERT. THE AGREEMENT FOR THE JOINT USE SHALL BE IN THE FORM OF A RECORDED COVENANT AND SHALL BE ACCEPTABLE TO THE CITY ATTORNEY. THE APPROVAL FOR THE JOINT USE CAN BE GRANTED ONLY BY THE COMMISSION AND SHALL APPLY EXCLUSIVELY TO THE C-1 AND OP ZONING DISTRICTS. (ORD. 1259 § 1, 2013) 1/16"-1'-0" NEW SITE PLAN 1186 8''SS8''SS8''SS 8''SS 8''SS 8''SS 8''SS SHEET A-1.23SHEET A-1.22SHEETA-1.23SHEETA-1.22PLANTER 7'-11" EXISTING ±84'-2" EXISTING 7'-9" EXISTING19'-61 2" EXISTING 35'-1"9'-6" 45'-0" NEW PARKING18'-4"TYP. MATCH EXISTING STALLSN1 N1 N1 N1 N1 N2 N2 N3N4N4N5 N5 CONCRETE01 02 03 048'-11"9'-6"N6 N6 9'-0" TYP.13'-1"N3 N24'-5"N4 N4 N4 NEW TRASH ENCLOSURE 8'-7"PLANTERNEW PATH OF TRAVEL NEW PATH OF TRAVEL N1N1 N1 N1N2N2 N2 N2 N3 N3 PLANTERN3 05 N4 7'-7" N4N4N4 4'-10"4'-0"CLEAR5'-0"CLEAR5'-0"CLEAREXISTING ELECTRICAL 1 A-1.30 SIM 8'-5"N2 PAVERN10 N10 CONCRETEFIREPLACE 39'-2" N8 NEW PATIO 2,977 SF EXISTING RESTAURANT F.F.± 247'-0"10'-0"12'-4"19'-11"19'-11"24'-25 8"HEATERHEATERHEATERHEATERHEATERHEATERHEATERHEATERN8 PLANTER DRAINN4PLANTERPLANTER PLANTER2'-10" N9N9 36" PA 5'-0"NEW PATH OF TRAVEL4'-0"CLEAR6'-0"3'-6" CLEAR 4'-0" CLEAR 8'-8"8'X40' CONTAINER 36" PA 36" PA N4 20'X40' NEW PERGOLA 6"6"PAVERNEW PATH OF TRAVEL EXISTING PATH OF TRAVEL EXISTING PATH OF TRAVEL NEW PATH OF TRAVEL NEW ADA PARKING NEW ADA PARKING6"5'-0" CLEAR 5 A-1.31 SIM4'-5" CLEARSLOPESLOPE 3'-0"N23'-4"N7 N3 N4 N5 N2 N3 N7 N4 N4 N7 6 A-1.31 TYP 6 A-1.31 TYP 6 A-1.31 TYP 3/16" - 1'-0" PARTIAL NEW SITE PLAN FEBRUARY.29.2024 Sheet: Date: Scale: PATIO REMODEL FOR WILDEST RESTAURANT 72990 EL PASEO #3 PALM DESERT CA,. 92260 z a y d a @ z b r a u n d e s i g n s . c o m 7 6 0 . 8 9 8 . 4 8 6 5 w w w . Z b r a u n d e s i g n s . c o m D E S I G N S A-1.22 PAVERS AREAS LINEN COLORGARD 175 S.F. FOUNDRY COLORGARD 2,613 S.F. GRAPHITE COLORGARD 99 S.F. HARDSCAPE LEGEND MODULINE 6X12 LINEN COLORGARD MODULINE 6X12 FOUNDRY COLORGARD MODULINE 6X12 GRAPHITE COLORGARD CONCRETE, TO MATCH EXISTING 3/16"-1'-0" PARTIAL NEW SITE PLAN NEW KEYNOTES NEW CURB PER CITY STANDARD, REFER TO CIVIL DRAWINGS NEW CONCRETE SIDEWALK TO BE AMIN. OF 4" THICK CONCRETE. FINISH TO MATCH EXISTING. NEW PLANTER, REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLAN NEW TREE, REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLAN NEW 40" HIGH RETAINING WALL TO BE 8"X8"X16" SINGLE CORE (BOTH SIDES) PRECISION BLOCK, COLOR: GREY MW & BLACK 250 MW BY ORCO. NEW ASPHALT SURFACE & CAR STALL STRIPING TO MATCH EXISTING NEW HERB GARDEN BOX PROPOSED HERB GARDEN WALL, MOUNTED ON CONTAINER. NEW 8FT WIDE X 6'8"H CONTAINER ROLLER DOOR TO BE A MIN OF 26" GA. STEEL WITH 5/8" CORRUGATION. PRIMED AND PAINT. PROVIDE WEATHER TIGHT FRAMING KIT, THRESHOLD AND HEADER. CONTAINER AND ROLLER DOORS TO BE COVERED WITH DECORATIVE GRAPHICS AS SHOWN ON MATERIAL BOARD EXISTING LIGHT POLE TO BE PROTECTED DURING CONSTRUCTION. NEW 3FT WIDE X 3FT HIGH CONTAINER STAND ROLL WINDOW TO BE A MIN OF 26" GA. STEEL WITH 5/8" CORRUGATION. PRIMED AND PAINT. PROVIDE WEATHER TIGHT FRAMING KIT, THRESHOLD AND HEADER. CONTAINER AND ROLLER DOORS TO BE COVERED WITH DECORATIVE GRAPHICS AS SHOWN ON MATERIAL BOARD N1 N2 N3 N4 N5 N6 N7 N8 N9 N10 N11 1187 8''SS8 ' ' S S 8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS8''SS 8''SS 8''SS 8''SS 8''SS 8''SS 8''SS SHEET A-1.23SHEET A-1.22SHEETA-1.23SHEETA-1.22SLOPE N1 N1 N1 N1 5'-0"CLEARN2 3'-0"CLEARSLOPE 5 A-1.31 SIM EXISTING RESTAURANT F.F.± 247'-0" EXISTING ELECTRICAL ROOM NEW EXISTING N2 N2 EXISTING FIRE RISER ROOM NEW PATH OF TRAVELNEW PATH OF TRAVEL EXISTING PATH OF TRAVEL NEW PATH OF TRAVEL EXISTING PATH OF TRAVELEXISTING PATH OF TRAVELEXISTING PATH OF TRAVEL EXISTING PATH OF TRAVEL EXISTING PATH OF TRAVEL EXISTING RAMP EXISTING ADA PARKING EXISTING ADA PARKING 5 A-1.31 SIM 4'-0"CLEAR4'-0"CLEARNEW PATH OF TRAVEL 3/16" - 1'-0" PARTIAL NEW SITE PLAN FEBRUARY.29.2024 Sheet: Date: Scale: PATIO REMODEL FOR WILDEST RESTAURANT 72990 EL PASEO #3 PALM DESERT CA,. 92260 z a y d a @ z b r a u n d e s i g n s . c o m 7 6 0 . 8 9 8 . 4 8 6 5 w w w . Z b r a u n d e s i g n s . c o m D E S I G N S A-1.23 HARDSCAPE LEGEND MODULINE 6X12 LINEN COLORGARD MODULINE 6X12 FOUNDRY COLORGARD MODULINE 6X12 GRAPHITE COLORGARD CONCRETE, TO MATCH EXISTING 3/16"-1'-0" PARTIAL NEW SITE PLAN NEW KEYNOTES NEW CURB PER CITY STANDARD, REFER TO CIVIL DRAWINGS NEW CONCRETE SIDEWALK TO BE AMIN. OF 4" THICK CONCRETE. FINISH TO MATCH EXISTING. NEW PLANTER, REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLAN NEW TREE, REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLAN NEW 40" HIGH RETAINING WALL TO BE 8"X8"X16" SINGLE CORE (BOTH SIDES) PRECISION BLOCK, COLOR: GREY MW & BLACK 250 MW BY ORCO. NEW ASPHALT SURFACE & CAR STALL STRIPING TO MATCH EXISTING NEW HERB GARDEN BOX PROPOSED HERB GARDEN WALL, MOUNTED ON CONTAINER. NEW 8FT WIDE X 6'8"H CONTAINER ROLLER DOOR TO BE A MIN OF 26" GA. STEEL WITH 5/8" CORRUGATION. PRIMED AND PAINT. PROVIDE WEATHER TIGHT FRAMING KIT, THRESHOLD AND HEADER. CONTAINER AND ROLLER DOORS TO BE COVERED WITH DECORATIVE GRAPHICS AS SHOWN ON MATERIAL BOARD EXISTING LIGHT POLE TO BE PROTECTED DURING CONSTRUCTION. NEW 3FT WIDE X 3FT HIGH CONTAINER STAND ROLL WINDOW TO BE A MIN OF 26" GA. STEEL WITH 5/8" CORRUGATION. PRIMED AND PAINT. PROVIDE WEATHER TIGHT FRAMING KIT, THRESHOLD AND HEADER. CONTAINER AND ROLLER DOORS TO BE COVERED WITH DECORATIVE GRAPHICS AS SHOWN ON MATERIAL BOARD N1 N2 N3 N4 N5 N6 N7 N8 N9 N10 N11 PAVERS AREAS LINEN COLORGARD 175 S.F. FOUNDRY COLORGARD 2,613 S.F. GRAPHITE COLORGARD 99 S.F. 1188 (248.17)(EG)(247.70)(EG)(247.30)(EG)(248.68)(EG)(246.52)(EG)(246.92)(EG)(246.23)(EG)(246.19)(EG)(245.84)(EG)(244.79)(EG)(245.66)(EG)(246.41)(EG)(245.73)(EG)(246.38)(EG)(245.88)(EG)(248.51)(EG)(247.23)(EG)(246.65)(EG)(246.33)(EG)(246.05)(EG)(249.50)(EG)W(250.05)(249.16)(EG)(249.05)(EG)(247.89)(EG)(247.54)(EG)(248.52)(EG)(247.60)(EG)(246.97)(EG)(249.38)(EG)(246.49)(EG)(246.33)(EG)(249)(248)( 2 4 7 )(248)(249)(247 )(246)(2 4 5 ) (ELEC. ROOM) (FACP) 3 WILDEST GREENS G (ASPHALT) (ASPHALT) (ASPHALT) (ASPHALT)G(TELE-MH) (SSCO)(GAS PER USA MARKOUT)(GAS PER USA MARKOUT)(ELECTRICAL PER USA MARKOUT)(ELECTRICAL PER USA MARKOUT)(TELECOM PER USA MARKOUT)(ELECTRICAL PER U S A M A R K O U T ) (TELEC O M P E R U S A M A R K O U T )(TELECOM PER USA MARKOUT)(GAS PER USA MARKOUT)(TELECOM PER USA MARKOUT)(TELECOM PER USA MARKOUT)(FF = 247.0) ( 2 4 7 . 0 0 T C ) ( 2 4 6 . 5 6 F S ) ( 2 4 8 . 1 5 T C ) ( 2 4 7 . 8 0 F S ) ( 2 4 7 . 0 2 T C ) ( 2 4 6 . 6 5 F S ) ( 2 4 8 . 1 2 T C ) ( 2 4 7 . 7 6 F S ) ( 2 4 6 . 5 1 T C ) ( 2 4 6 . 1 2 F S ) ( 2 4 7 . 0 0 T C ) ( 2 4 6 . 4 0 I N V ) ( C U R B D R A I N ) ( 2 D R A I N S ) (2 4 6 ) ( 2 4 6 . 5 0 I N V ) ( C U R B D R A I N ) ( 2 D R A I N S ) ( 2 4 7 . 0 1 T C ) (EXISTING BUILDING)(CONCRETE)(CONCRETE)(CONCRETE)(SSCO)(SSCO)( 2 4 5 . 6 2 T C ) ( 2 4 5 . 0 8 F S ) ( 2 4 9 . 5 3 T C ) ( 2 4 8 . 9 9 F S ) ( 2 4 7 . 9 8 T C ) ( 2 4 7 . 6 0 F S ) EXISTING RESTAURANT F.F.±247'-0" 247.00FS 246.60FS/TG 247.00FS247.00FS247.00FS 247.00FS 243.80INV 6 " S T O R M D R A I N P I P E @ 1 % 246.40TG 6" STORM DRAIN @ 1 % 246.60FS/TG 246.60FS/TG SLOT DRAIN 244.60INV 244.60INV 248.00TC/TG 244.35INV CLEANOUT CLEANOUT CLEANOUT BUBBLER BOX CONNECT ROOF DRAINS251.33TW 247.00FS 251.33TW 247.00FS 251.33TW 247.00FS 251.33TW 247.00FS 249.80TC 249.42FS 246.95TC 246.45FS 250.00TC 249.50FS 249.00TC 248.50FS 247.00TC 246.50FS JOIN EX. PATIO COVER COLUMN ( T Y P I C A L ) 251.33TW 247.00FS 1.75%± 1.75%±1.75%±1.75%±TO CATCH BASINCULVERT249.05TC 248.55FS(N00°29'20"W 326.00')(N89°30'40"E 3 3 . 0 0 ' ) 01 02 03 04 05 18'9'PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN 72-990 EL PASEO IN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA PROJECT INFO CIVIL ENGINEER: BENJAMIN EGAN EGAN CIVIL INC 46150 COMMERCE ST, STE. 100 INDIO, CA 92201 PHONE: (760) 404-7663 PROJECT DATA: TOTAL LOT AREA: 49,008 SF (1.125 AC) DISTURBED AREA: 4,500 SF (0.103 AC) BUILDING TYPE: PATIO PATIO AREA: 2,990 SQUARE FEET PRIVATE LANDSCAPE AREA: 600 +/- SF PUBLIC LANDSCAPE AREA: N/A EARTHWORK QUANTITIES: RAW CUT: <50 C.Y. RAW FILL: <50 C.Y. IMPORT: 0 C.Y. EXPORT: 0 C.Y. PROJECT: WILDEST RESTAURANT PATIO 72-990 EL PASEO PALM DESERT, CA 92260 APN AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 640-170-013 FEMA FLOOD DATA: TOPOGRAPHIC AND BOUNDARY SURVEY: PROVIDED BY EGAN CIVIL INC. OWNER: APPLICANT REFERENCE DATA: LOT 5 OF PARCEL MAP 14710 APN# 640-170-013 REVISIONS MARK BY DATE ENGINEER CITY DATEAPPR. APPROVED BY: BENJAMIN DANIEL EGAN, R.C.E. NO. 73070 PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECT SUPERVISION OF: DATE: CITY OF PALM DESERT DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS TRAFFIC LANDSCAPE CIVIL PLAN CHECKED BY: 1 OF SHEET CITY FILE NUMBER SHEETS CITY OF PALM DESERT Know what's below.before you dig.Call R FLOOD ZONE: X PANEL: 06065C2207H REV. DATE: APRIL 19, 2017 ZONE DEFINITION: AREA WITH REDUCED FLOOD RISK DUE TO LEVEE PARCEL MAP 14710, PMB 83/22-23 1 PMB 83/ 22-23 LOT 5 OF PARCEL MAP NO 14710 MAP BOOK 83 PAGES 22-23 N.T.S. VICINITY MAP DATE: BASIS OF BEARINGS: BENCHMARK: PD #139 ELEVATION: 245.597 FT DATUM: NGVD88 LOCATION: 2" BRASS DISK SET FLUSH IN TOP OF CATCH BASIN ON WESTERLY SIDE OF HIGHWAY 74, 176 FT NORTHERLY OF ECR OF EL PASEO, 3.8 FT WEST OF CURB FACE ACTING CITY ENGINEER JOHN D. TANNER III, P.E. R.C.E. 60132 EL PASEO WEST PROPERTIES, LLC C/O BILL HAY 49455 COACHELLA DR LA QUINTA, CA 92253 NO. 73070BENJAMIN D A NIEL EGANREGISTERED PRO F E S SIONAL ENGI NEERCI V ILSTATE OF C A LIFORNIAPO BOX 5282, LA QUINTA, CA 92248-5282 EGAN CIVIL, INC. (760) 404-7663 WWW.EGANCIVIL.COM 1. ALL UNDERGROUND FACILITIES, INCLUDING LATERALS, SHALL BE IN PLACE, AND ALL TRENCHES COMPACTED AND TESTED PRIOR TO PAVING. 2. ALL EXISTING OR NEW IMPROVEMENTS, INCLUDING CURB AND GUTTERS, SIDEWALKS, ASPHALT CONCRETE OR P.C.C. PAVING, WHICH ARE BEING JOINED OR MATCHED IN CONNECTION WITH THIS PROJECT SHALL BE JOINED OR MATCHED IN A MANNER SATISFACTORY TO THE CITY ENGINEER, INCLUDING NECESSARY SAWCUTTING, REMOVAL, REPLACEMENT AND CAPPING. 3. NEW OR EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER SHALL BE MARKED AT EVERY 10 FEET WITH A SCORE LINE AND EVERY 50 FEET WITH A CONSTRUCTION EXPANSION JOINT. 4. NEW OR EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER SHALL BE JOINED, MATCHED, OR REPLACED IF DAMAGED, TO A SAWCUT LINE SUCH THAT A MINIMUM LENGTH OF 7 FEET OR CURB AND GUTTER REMAINS IN PLACE AT ALL LOCATIONS. 5. A “TACK COAT” SHALL BE APPLIED BETWEEN PAVEMENT LAYERS, CONCRETE SURFACES AND ON EXISTING PAVEMENT TO BE RESURFACED AT THE RATE OF 0.10 GAL/YD. THE TACK COAT SHALL BE TYPE SS1 ASPHALTIC EMULSION WITH A 60-70 GRADE LIQUID ASPHALT. 6. THE VISCOSITY GRADE OF PAVING ASPHALT SHALL BE AR-4000 OR AS DETERMINED BY THE CITY ENGINEER AT THE TIME OF PAVING. 7. THE FINAL OR SURFACE LAYER OF ASPHALT CONCRETE SHALL NOT BE PLACED UNTIL ALL ON-SITE IMPROVEMENTS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED, INCLUDING ALL EARTHWORK GRADING. 8. MANHOLES AND VALVE BOX FRAMES SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO FINISHED GRADES AFTER COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION TO THE STANDARDS OF THE FACILITY OWNER. 9. ALL EXISTING PAVEMENT WITHIN AND ADJOINING THIS PROJECT SHALL BE EITHER REMOVED OR STRUCTURALLY TESTED TO VERIFY THAT THE STRUCTURAL CAPABILITIES ARE ACCEPTABLE. ALL RESULTS SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE CITY ENGINEER. 10. THE CURB SHALL BE “ETCHED” SHOWING LATERAL LOCATIONS:“S” FOR SEWER,“G” FOR GAS, AND “E” FOR ELECTRICAL. 11. ALL PERMANENT ROADWAY TRAFFIC STRIPING, LEGENDS AND PAVEMENT MARKERS SHALL BE INSTALLED AFTER PERMANENT PAVING. THE TYPE AND LOCATIONS SHALL BE INSTALLED PER PLAN OR AS DIRECTED BY THE CITY ENGINEER. 12. TEMPORARY ROADWAY STRIPING SHALL BE INSTALLED ON ALL UNFINISHED ROADWAY SURFACES AS DIRECTED BY THE CITY ENGINEER. GRADING GENERAL NOTES 1.ALL GRADING TO BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF PALM DESERT GRADING ORDINANCE. 2.THIS PLAN IS FOR GRADING PURPOSES ONLY. ISSUANCE OF A GRADING PERMIT BASED ON THIS PLAN DOES NOT CONSTITUTE APPROVAL OF DRIVEWAY LOCATIONS AND SIZES, PARKING LAYOUT, BUILDING LOCATION, WALL HEIGHTS AND LOCATIONS, OFFSITE DRAINAGE FACILITIES, OR OTHER ITEMS NOT RELATED DIRECTLY TO THE BASIC GRADING OPERATION. 3.A LETTER OF CERTIFICATION FROM THE ENGINEER-OF-WORK STATING THAT THE GRADING IS IN SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE WITH THE APPROVED PLAN AND THAT THE PAD ELEVATION/FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION ARE PER THE APPROVED PLAN, AND A COMPACTION REPORT FROM A SOILS ENGINEER ON ALL FILL AREAS ARE REQUIRED PRIOR TO THE BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE. 4.ALL WALLS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, ISSUED A SEPARATE PERMIT AND BE INSPECTED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING AND SAFETY. THOSE WALLS SHOWN AS RETAINING WALLS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED TO CITY OF PALM DESERT RETAINING WALL STANDARDS OR BE SUPPORTED BY ENGINEERING CALCULATIONS AND DETAILS. 5.THE ENGINEER-OF-WORK SHALL BE NOTIFIED WHEN CONSTRUCTION HAS COMMENCED. 6.IN THE EVENT OF DISCREPANCIES AND/OR DEVIATIONS ARISING DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE ENGINEER-OF-WORK SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DETERMINING AN ACCEPTABLE SOLUTION AND REVISING THE PLANS FOR APPROVAL BY THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS. 7.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL DAMAGES TO ON-SITE, OFF-SITE AND ADJACENT UTILITIES, FACILITIES AND PROPERTIES. 8.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL NECESSARY AND PROPER PRECAUTIONS TO PROTECT ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS FROM ANY AND ALL DAMAGE THAT MAY OCCUR FROM STORM WATER RUNOFF AND/OR DEPOSITION OF DEBRIS RESULTING FROM ANY AND ALL WORK IN CONJUNCTION WITH CONSTRUCTION OF THESE GRADING PLANS. 9.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS (760) 776-6450 AT LEAST 24 HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCING ANY WORK. 10.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE LOCATION AND PROTECTION OF ALL UTILITIES. FOR THE LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES, OR FOR EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE CALL: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1-800-227-2600 THE GAS COMPANY 1-800-227-2600 FRONTIER 1-888-669-9034 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1-760-398-2651 SPECTRUM 1-855-986-4919 11.ALL PROPERTY CORNER MONUMENTS SHALL NOT BE DISTURBED BY THE GRADING OPERATION AND RELATED WORK. ANY MONUMENT WHICH THE CONTRACTOR ANTICIPATES DISTURBING SHALL BE LOCATED AND REFERENCED BY A LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR OR A CIVIL ENGINEER AUTHORIZED TO PRACTICE LAND SURVEYING. ALL MONUMENTS DISTURBED OR REMOVED SHALL BE RESET BY A LICENSED SURVEYOR, OR A CIVIL ENGINEER AUTHORIZED TO PRACTICE LAND SURVEYING, AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. 12.THESE PLANS MAY BE SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND/OR REVISION BY THE CITY OF PALM DESERT DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, IF CONSTRUCTION HAS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 12 MONTHS FROM THE DATE OF APPROVAL BY PUBLIC WORKS. PAVING NOTES DATE OF SURVEY: 9/10/20 AND 9/24/20 LOT 5 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 14710 PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN LOT 5 OF PARCEL MAP NO 14710 (PMB 83/22-23) WILDESET RESTAURANT PATIO MONTEREY AVEHIG HWAY 1 1 1 PLAZA WAYEL PASEO HI G H W A Y 7 4NOT TO SCALESITEPALM DESERTBEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE OF PARCEL 2, AS SHOWN BY A MAP ON FILE IN PARCEL MAP BOOK 83, PAGES 22 THROUGH 23 INCLUSIVE OF MAPS, RECORDS OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BEING:NORTH 89°30'40"EAST. THE QUANTITIES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE FOR THE PURPOSES OF OBTAINING A PERMIT ONLY! THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THEIR OWN QUANTITIES FOR BIDDING PURPOSES! IN YOUR WILDEST GREENS, LLC C/O CHARISSA FARLEY-HAY PO BOX 14450 PALM DESERT, CA 92255 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TOM DOCZI TKD ASSOCIATES, INC. 71-711 SAN JACINTO DR, STE. C RANCHO MIRAGE, CA 92270 SCALE: 1"=10'10 5 10 20 30 SCALE: 1"=10' 0 03/04/2024 PLOT DATE: MARCH 04, 20241189 1190 NEW TRASH ENCLOSURE 8"9'-1"3'-0"9'-1"8"3'-4" CLEAR8'-2"11'-6"4'-0"CLEAR5'-01 4" 5' MIN CLEAR NEW TRASH ENCLOSUREORGANIC CONTAINERS 6" CONCRETE PAD 3'-4"CLEAREXISTING BUILDING 2 A-1.30 1'-8"22'-6"6'-6"CONCRETE PAD 22'-6" 8"5'-21 2" 4A A-1.30 4F A-1.30 4D A-1.30 4B A-1.30 4C A-1.30 4H A-1.30 5'-21 2"4"5'-21 2"5'-21 2"8" 4C A-1.30 4H A-1.30 4F A-1.30 4D A-1.30 4A A-1.30 6'-0"7'-0"24 GA. COATED STEEL ROOF PANEL FASTENED TO STEEL TUBE; BELVEDERE 6" SHORT RIB. MFR: ATAS INTERNATIONAL COLOR: SANDSTONE 06 2X4 STEEL TUBES @48" O.C. CAP ENDS, PRIMED AND PAINTED TO MATCH ROOF METAL PANEL. 4X6 STEEL TUBE; PRIME AND PAINTED TO MATCH ROOF METAL PANEL. 4X4 STEEL COLUMN; PRIME AND PAINTED TO MATCH ROOF METAL PANEL. CUSTOM METAL DOORS, PRIME AND PAINTED TO MATCH ROOF METAL PANEL FINISH GRADE STUCCO FINISH WALL TO DASH FINISH MATCH BUILDING. PAINT COLOR: SW 7043 WORLDLY GREY 1 |" x 2" x _" STL. 4" x 2" x 3/16" STL. TUBE FRAME 4" 4.1 w/ 1/2"~ x 8" ANCHORS @ 4" FROM TOP & 1'-4" O.C.C B CONSIST OF 3/16" THK. STL. PLATE & STL. SUB-CONTR. HINGE SHALL & TO TUBE FRAME, BY MISC. IRON CONT. HINGE WELDED TO JAMB ANGLE FRAME 1" CLR. 2"2" CMU WALL 4" x 4" STEEL COLUMN 1 |" x 2" x |" STL. ANGLE FRAME (MITER & WELD) 2"1"2" SECTION 7" 9" 4" E7"3"ELEVATION D 1/2"~ HOLE FOR PADLOCK 4"X 2" STL. TUBES |" x 2" x |" x 2" LONG 2" x 7" x |" PL. 4" SHOWN FOR CLARITY) 1/4" PLATE 3/4"~ ROD BOTH SIDES (NOT FRAME (MITER & WELD) SECTION OF GATE) OF PAVEMENT CLOSED AND OPEN POSITION PAVEMENT (INSTALL PIPES AT 1"~ x 12" STD. PIPE INTO WASHER, WELD TO ROD TOP4"ELEVATION1'-0"GF CONT. HINGE WELDED TO JAMB & TO TUBE PLATE W/ CASE HARDENED CONT. STEEL PIN. FRAME BY MISC. IRON & STEEL SUB-CONTR. HINGE SHALL CONSIST OF |" THK. STEEL 3" x 2" x 3/16" STEEL TUBE FRAME 4" 4.1 W/ 1/2"~ x 8" ANCHORS @ 4" FROM VERCO TYPE HSB 22 GA. GALV G-60 TOP & 1'-4" O.C. WELDING FOR DECK: ANGLES 6" O.C. SIDE ANGLES 1/2"~ PLUG WELDS TO TOP & BOTTOM BUTTON PUNCH SEAMS @ 12" O.C. 1/2"~ PLUG WELDS @ 12" O.C. TO ELEVATION 4" x 4" STEEL COLUMN ROOF DECK OR EQUAL CONCRETE FOOTING WITH #3 TIEAS @ 12" O.C.3"CLR. 36"2'-0" AND 4-#5 VERTICAL BARS 2"F.F.6116"F.F. F.F.6"E G A 4" x 4" STEEL COLUMN H 4" 4.1 w/ 1/2"~ x 8" ANCHORS @ 4" FROM TOP & 1'-4" O.C. 4" x 2" x 3/16" STL. TUBE FRAME 1 |" x 2" x _" STL. ANGLE FRAME CONT. HINGE WELDED TO JAMB & TO TUBE FRAME, BY MISC. IRON & STL. SUB-CONTR. HINGE SHALL CONSIST OF 3/16" THK. STL. PLATE10"1'-0"6'-0" MAX.2'-6"3"CLR3"3" REVERSE DIRECTION OF HOOK ON EVERY OTHER REBAR 1-#4 CONT. 4" CONCRETE SLAB WHERE OCCURS #4'S @ 24" O.C. VERTICAL 8X8X16 CMU BLOCK BOND BEAM FINISH AS NOTED ON PLANS #4'S @ 32" O.C. HORIZ. 1-#4 CONT. @ TOP FINISH GRADE NOTES: ·DETAIL PER CITY OF PD STANDARDS ·GROUT ONLY CELL CONTAINING REBARDS ·GRADE DIFFERENTIALS OF MORE THAN 6" NOT ALLOWED ·REBAR TO BE CENTERED IN MASONRY CELLS 24" MIN.SLOPESLOPE24 GA. COATED STEEL ROOF PANEL FASTENED TO STEEL TUBE; BELVEDERE 6" SHORT RIB BY ATAS ROOFING. COLOR: SANDSTONE 06 22'-6"8'-6"3'-4"AS NOTED TRASH ENCLOSURE FEBRUARY.29.2024 Sheet: Date: Scale: PATIO REMODEL FOR WILDEST RESTAURANT 72990 EL PASEO #3 PALM DESERT CA,. 92260 z a y d a @ z b r a u n d e s i g n s . c o m 7 6 0 . 8 9 8 . 4 8 6 5 w w w . Z b r a u n d e s i g n s . c o m D E S I G N S A-1.30 1/4"-1'-0" TRASH ENCLOSURE FLOOR PLAN TRASH ENCLOSURE ELEVATION 1/2"-1'-0"2 FREE STANDING BLOCK WALL 1"-1'-0"3 TRASH ENCLOSURE - GATE DETAILS 1-1/2"-1'-0"4 1/4"-1'-0" TRASH ENCLOSURE FLOOR PLAN 1191 B - TRUNCATED DOMES SECTION SCALE: N.T.S. TRUNCATED DOMES PLAN SCALE: N.T.S. TAPERED WHERE EDGES EXPOSED 2.35" APART 1 . 6 7 " A P RO X .2.35"APART0.9"AT BASE.45"AT TOP0.2" HT.B C IF A WALK CROSSES OR ADJOINS A VEHICULAR WAY, AND THE WALKING SURFACES ARE NOT AEPRATED BY CURBS RAILINGS OR OTHER ELEMENTS BETWEEN THE PEDESTRAIN AREAS AND THE VEHICULAR AREAS, THE BOUNDARYBETWEEN THE AREAS SHALL BE DEFINED BY A CONTINUOUS DETECTABLE WARNING WHICH IS 36" WIDE.TRUNCATED DOMES TILE SCALE: N.T.S. A NOTE: 1.RAMP RUNS SHALL HAVE A RUNNING SLOPE NOT STEEPER THAN 1:12 (8.33%). 2.WHERE PROVIDED, CURB RAMP FLARES SHALL NOT BE STEEPER THAN 1:10 (10%). 3.A TURNING SPACE OF 48"X48" MIN. SHALL BE PROVIDED AT THE BOTTOM OF CURB RAMPS. 4.SLOPE OF TURNING SPACE NOT TO EXCEED 1:48 (2%) IN ALL DIRECTIONS. 5.LANDINGS SHALL BE PROVIDED AT THE TOP OF CURB RAMPS. LANDING CLEAR LENGTH SHALL BE 48" MIN. AND CLEAR WIDTH AS WIDE AS THE CURB RAMP. 6.SLOPE AT LANDINGS NOT TO EXCEED 1:48 (2%). 7.CURB RAMPS AND THE FLARED SIDES OF CURB RAMPS SHALL BE LOCATED SO THAT THEY DO NOT PROJECT INTO VEHICULAR TRAFFIC LANES, PARKING SPACES OR PARKING ACCESS AISLES. 8.BOTTOM OF CURB RAMPS TO BE PROVIDED WITH DETECTABLE WARNING. DETECTABLE WARNING. SEE DETAIL A SMOOTH TRANSITION 48" MIN. TOP LANDING RAMP LENGTH AS NEEDED SLOPE 8.33% MAX.48" MIN.WIDTHSIDEWALK CURB SIDEWALK CURB AC PAVEMENT 6'-0" MIN. RAMP LENGTH 48" MIN. CLEAR END CURB RAMP PROFILE END CURB RAMP PARALLEL CURB RAMPDE SLOPE 1.12% MAX. SLOPE 1.12% MAX. 48" MIN. LANDING RAMP WIDTH AS NEEDED RAMP WIDTH AS NEEDED 48" MIN. TOP LANDING 48" MIN. TOP LANDING DETECTABLE WARNING. SEE DETAIL A SMOOTH TRANSITION72" MIN.3'-0"3'-0"6"MORTAR OR MASONRY CAP #4 HORIZONTAL AT TOP OF WALL 2"6" MIN.23 4" TO CENTER OF VERTICAL REINFORCING CMU BLOCK WALL SOLID GROUTED LEVEL BACKFILL NON-EXPANSIVE NATIVE SOIL OR FILL 1'-0"3'-5" MAX.#3 @ 16" GRAVER BACKFILL #3 HORIZONTAL REINFORCING @16" O.C.1'-0" MIN.1'-0"6"10"6"2'-3" 3" TYP CLEAR HEEL TOE #3 CONT.3" CLR.9"2"CLR.3" MAX.#5 REINFORCING W/ STANDARD HOOK @16" O.C. PERFORATED DRAIN PIPE MORTAR KEY OPTIONAL #3 DOWELS W/ STANDAR HOOK @ 16" O.C. #4 REINFORCING W/ STANDARD HOOK @ 16" O.C. 1'-0" MIN. AS NOTED DETAILS FEBRUARY.29.2024 Sheet: Date: Scale: PATIO REMODEL FOR WILDEST RESTAURANT 72990 EL PASEO #3 PALM DESERT CA,. 92260 z a y d a @ z b r a u n d e s i g n s . c o m 7 6 0 . 8 9 8 . 4 8 6 5 w w w . Z b r a u n d e s i g n s . c o m D E S I G N S A-1.31 RAMP DETAILS NTS 5 RETAINING WALL DETAIL NTS 6 1192 8'X40'CONTAINER 8' HEIGHT FIREPLACE 1'-5"(E) GRADE LINE EXISTING BUILDING (E)ELEV. 248.42' (E)ELEV. 247.27' LIVING WALL (E)ELEV. 247.93'2'-6"9'-11"10'-0"44'-11" 20'-0" PROPOSED TRELLIS SYSTEM23'-5"8" (N) CURB 18'-0" EXISTING PARKING STALL HEATER HEATER 247.0' (E) F.F. EXISTING AISLE 2'-10" (N) PLANTER LIVING WALL 3'-5"N1 N2 N5 N8 N8 (N)DRAINING 246.60' SITE DRAINING, REFER TO GRADING PLAN N3 N11 N9 4'-0"6" 6 A-1.31 TYP (E)ELEV. 247.30'(N)T.O.C. 247.00'(N)T.O.C. 247.00' (E)ELEV. 246.84' (E)CONCRETE 247.36' EXISTING BUILDING (E) GRADE LINE 40'-0" PROPOSED TRELLIS SYSTEM (E) GRADE LINE(E) GRADE LINE (E) GRADE LINE PROPOSED TRASH ENCLOSURE FIREPLACE 8'-0" (N)CONTAINER 3'-4"10'-0"(E)T.O.C. 247.54'3'-4"EXISTING AISLE4'-5" (N) PLANTER8"11'-4" CLEAR42'-0"2'-6" CLEAR 18'-0" EXISTING PARKING STALL8"6'-0" (N) PLANTEREXISTING AISLE N1N1 N5 N5 N6 4'-0"6"4'-0"6" N2N3 N11 N2 N3 3 A-1.30 TYP 3 A-1.30 TYP 1/4" - 1'-0" SITE SECTIONS FEBRUARY.29.2024 Sheet: Date: Scale: PATIO REMODEL FOR WILDEST RESTAURANT 72990 EL PASEO #3 PALM DESERT CA,. 92260 z a y d a @ z b r a u n d e s i g n s . c o m 7 6 0 . 8 9 8 . 4 8 6 5 w w w . Z b r a u n d e s i g n s . c o m D E S I G N S A-1.40 SITE SECTION 1/4"-1'-0"1 SITE SECTION 1/4"-1'-0"2 NEW KEYNOTES NEW CURB PER CITY STANDARD, REFER TO CIVIL DRAWINGS NEW CONCRETE SIDEWALK TO BE AMIN. OF 4" THICK CONCRETE. FINISH TO MATCH EXISTING. NEW PLANTER, REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLAN NEW TREE, REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLAN NEW 40" HIGH RETAINING WALL TO BE 8"X8"X16" SINGLE CORE (BOTH SIDES) PRECISION BLOCK, COLOR: GREY MW & BLACK 250 MW BY ORCO. NEW ASPHALT SURFACE & CAR STALL STRIPING TO MATCH EXISTING NEW HERB GARDEN BOX PROPOSED HERB GARDEN WALL, MOUNTED ON CONTAINER. NEW 8FT WIDE X 6'8"H CONTAINER ROLLER DOOR TO BE A MIN OF 26" GA. STEEL WITH 5/8" CORRUGATION. PRIMED AND PAINT. PROVIDE WEATHER TIGHT FRAMING KIT, THRESHOLD AND HEADER. CONTAINER AND ROLLER DOORS TO BE COVERED WITH DECORATIVE GRAPHICS AS SHOWN ON MATERIAL BOARD EXISTING LIGHT POLE TO BE PROTECTED DURING CONSTRUCTION. NEW 3FT WIDE X 3FT HIGH CONTAINER STAND ROLL WINDOW TO BE A MIN OF 26" GA. STEEL WITH 5/8" CORRUGATION. PRIMED AND PAINT. PROVIDE WEATHER TIGHT FRAMING KIT, THRESHOLD AND HEADER. CONTAINER AND ROLLER DOORS TO BE COVERED WITH DECORATIVE GRAPHICS AS SHOWN ON MATERIAL BOARD N1 N2 N3 N4 N5 N6 N7 N8 N9 N10 N11 1193 (E) F.F. 0"2'-4"4"1 1/2"4 1/2"1'-0"6'-0"3"3"5'-2"1"1"2"9'-4"8"10'-0"2"4"2"4X4 POST 7 A-1.41 2'-2" 1" 2" 6 A-1.41 2"1"1" 2'-4" A-1.41 42'-2"17'-6"2'-2"21'-10"2'-2"17'-8"2'-2"17'-8"2'-2" 41'-10" 1'-1"1'-1" A-1.41 5 1'-1"1'-1" 17'-6" 1'-1"1'-1"19'-8"EQ EQEQEQ 1'-1" 17'-8" 1'-1"1'-1" 17'-8" 1'-1" 40'-0" 2"9'-5 1/4" 2" 5 1/2" 2" 9'-2 1/2" 2" 5 1/2" 2" 9'-2 1/2" 2" 5 1/2" 2" 9'-5 1/4" 2"20'-0"2"19'-8"2"9 1/2"4"9 1/2"9 1/2" 4"2"1'-0"1'-0"1'-0"1'-0"1'-0"(E) F.F. 0" B A.2 A 2'-2"2'-2"1'-10"EQEQEQ EQ 1'-10" 4X4 POST STONE VENEER 1"1"1"1'-10"1"1"1"1"1"1"1'-10"1"1"1"2'-4"2'-4"Sheet: Scale: Date: ADU FOR 7 6 0 . 8 9 8 . 4 8 6 5 w w w . Z b r a u n d e s i g n s . c o m z a y d a @ z b r a u n d e s i g n s . co m As indicated A-1.41 PERGOLA DETAILS MAY.21.2024 WILDEST RESTAURANT 72990 EL PASEO #3 PALM DESERT CA. 92260 3ISOMETRIC 1/2" = 1'-0"4COLUMN ELEVATION 1/4" = 1'-0"1PERGOLA FLOOR PLAN 1/4" = 1'-0"2PERGOLA CLG PLAN 1/2" = 1'-0"5COLUMN MATERIALS 1" = 1'-0"6COLUMN SECTION 1" = 1'-0"7COLUMN SECTION. 1194 T-1 T-1 T-1 T-1 T-1 T-1 T-1T-1T-1T-1 T-1T-1T-1 T-2 T-2 T-2 T-2 T-2 T-2 20 AMP DUPLEX BOX EQ.EQ.EQ.EQ.PROPERTY LINE326'TO EXISTING SWITCH AND TIME CLOCK/ PHOTO CELL T-1 FEBRUARY.29.2024 Sheet: Date: Scale: PATIO REMODEL FOR WILDEST RESTAURANT 72990 EL PASEO #3 PALM DESERT CA,. 92260 z a y d a @ z b r a u n d e s i g n s . c o m 7 6 0 . 8 9 8 . 4 8 6 5 w w w . Z b r a u n d e s i g n s . c o m D E S I G N S 1/4" - 1'-0" SITE ELECTRICAL PLAN A-1.50 TYPE:AXIS SERIES DOWN LIGHTS A1-30 WH INPUT: 120 VAC, 60HZ, 50MA MAX 5 WATTS OUTPUT: 36 VDC, 100 MA COMMENTS: DIMMING LIGHTS T-1 CEILING FAN ELECTRICAL LEGEND T-2 CHANDELIER OR PENDANT T-1 RECESSED LIGHT FIXTURE WATER PROOF DUPLEX WALL OUTLET WITH GROUND FAULT CIRCUIT INTERRUPTED (GFCI) SYMBOL CEILING MOUNT HEATER LIGHTING SCHEDULE T-2 TYPE: PENDANT OR CHANDELIER MODEL: CALYPSO SO OUTDOOR ANTIGUA, GUADALUPE AND MARTINIQUE MFR: CONTARDI COMMENTS: CONSULT OWNER PRIOR TYPE: HEATER MODEL: C-SERIES MFR: INFRATECH COMMENTS: 6000 WATTS 1/4"-1'-0" PARTIAL NEW ELECTRICAL PLAN 1195 Sheet: Scale: Date: ADU FOR 7 6 0 . 8 9 8 . 4 8 6 5 w w w . Z b r a u n d e s i g n s . c o m z a y d a @ z b r a u n d e s i g n s . co m A-2.00 MATERIAL BOARD FEBRUARY.29.2024 WILDEST RESTAURANT 72990 EL PASEO #3 PALM DESERT CA. 92260 MATERIAL KEYNOTES A. WALL PAINT (EXISTING) MFR: SHERWIN WILLIAMS COLOR: WORLDLY GRAY SW 7043 LRV: 57 A.1 WALL PAINT (EXISTING) MFR: SHERWIN WILLIAMS COLOR: POISED TAUPE SW 6039 LRV: 22 A.2 TRELLIS PAINT COLOR MFR: SHERWIN WILLIAMS COLOR: AESTHETIC WHITE SW 7035 LRV: 73 B. STONE VENEER TO MATCH EXISTING C. LIGHT FIXTURES MFR: CONTARDI STYLE: CALYPSO MODEL: ANTIGUA, GUADALOUPE AND MARTINIQUE D. CMU BLOCK MFR: ORCO BLOCK COLOR: GRAY MW STYLE: PRECISION BLOCK SINGLE CORE COMMENTS: HORIZONTAL STRIPES USING 2 COLORS, 1 COLOR PER ROW E. CMU BLOCK MFR: ORCO BLOCK COLOR: BLACK 250 MW STYLE: PRECISION BLOCK SINGLE CORE COMMENTS: HORIZONTAL STRIPES USING 2 COLORS, 1 COLOR PER ROW M. COATED STEEL ROOF PANEL MFR: ATAS INTERNATIONAL COLOR: SANDSTONE 06 A B C D E A.1 A.2 M 1196 Sheet: Scale: Date: ADU FOR 7 6 0 . 8 9 8 . 4 8 6 5 w w w . Z b r a u n d e s i g n s . c o m z a y d a @ z b r a u n d e s i g n s . co m A-2.01 MATERIAL BOARD FEBRUARY.29.2024 WILDEST RESTAURANT 72990 EL PASEO #3 PALM DESERT CA. 92260 MATERIAL KEYNOTES F. FIREPLACE EXISTING TO REMAIN G. VYNIL IMAGE MFR: ARTE STYLE: DESERT NIGHT 74062 DIMENSIONS: PANORAMIC COMMENTS: TO WRAP CONTAINER ROLL UP DOORS AND WINDOWS H. PAVER MFR: BELGARD STYLE: MODULINE 6X12 COLOR: GRAPHITE COMMENTS: SEE PLAN A-1.22 FOR PAVER DESIGN I. PAVER MFR: BELGARD STYLE: MODULINE 6X12 COLOR: FOUNDRY COMMENTS: SEE PLAN A-1.22 FOR PAVER DESIGN J. PAVER MFR: BELGARD STYLE: MODULINE 6X12 COLOR: LINEN COMMENTS: SEE PLAN A-1.22 FOR PAVER DESIGN K. METAL PLANTER SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR LOCATION SIZE: 24"X96" L. METAL DOOR 8FT WIDE X 6'8" HEIGHT CONTAINER METAL ROLLER DOOR TO BE COVERED WITH DECORATIVE GRAPHICS, MATERIAL G AS SHOWN ON THIS MATERIAL BOARD. F G H I J K L 1197 Sheet: Scale: Date: ADU FOR 7 6 0 . 8 9 8 . 4 8 6 5 w w w . Z b r a u n d e s i g n s . c o m z a y d a @ z b r a u n d e s i g n s . co m A-3.00 EXISTING SOUTH EAST VIEW FEBRUARY.29.2024 WILDEST RESTAURANT 72990 EL PASEO #3 PALM DESERT CA. 92260 1198 Sheet: Scale: Date: ADU FOR 7 6 0 . 8 9 8 . 4 8 6 5 w w w . Z b r a u n d e s i g n s . c o m z a y d a @ z b r a u n d e s i g n s . co m A-3.01 EXISTING SOUTH WEST VIEW FEBRUARY.29.2024 WILDEST RESTAURANT 72990 EL PASEO #3 PALM DESERT CA. 92260 1199 Sheet: Scale: Date: ADU FOR 7 6 0 . 8 9 8 . 4 8 6 5 w w w . Z b r a u n d e s i g n s . c o m z a y d a @ z b r a u n d e s i g n s . co m A-3.02 EXISTING SOUTH VIEW FEBRUARY.29.2024 WILDEST RESTAURANT 72990 EL PASEO #3 PALM DESERT CA. 92260 1200 Sheet: Scale: Date: ADU FOR 7 6 0 . 8 9 8 . 4 8 6 5 w w w . Z b r a u n d e s i g n s . c o m z a y d a @ z b r a u n d e s i g n s . co m A-4.00 NEW SOUTH EAST VIEW FEBRUARY.29.2024 WILDEST RESTAURANT 72990 EL PASEO #3 PALM DESERT CA. 92260 1201 Sheet: Scale: Date: ADU FOR 7 6 0 . 8 9 8 . 4 8 6 5 w w w . Z b r a u n d e s i g n s . c o m z a y d a @ z b r a u n d e s i g n s . co m A-4.01 NEW SOUTH WEST VIEW FEBRUARY.29.2024 WILDEST RESTAURANT 72990 EL PASEO #3 PALM DESERT CA. 92260 1202 Sheet: Scale: Date: ADU FOR 7 6 0 . 8 9 8 . 4 8 6 5 w w w . Z b r a u n d e s i g n s . c o m z a y d a @ z b r a u n d e s i g n s . co m A-4.02 NEW SOUTH VIEW FEBRUARY.29.2024 WILDEST RESTAURANT 72990 EL PASEO #3 PALM DESERT CA. 92260 1203 Sheet: Scale: Date: ADU FOR 7 6 0 . 8 9 8 . 4 8 6 5 w w w . Z b r a u n d e s i g n s . c o m z a y d a @ z b r a u n d e s i g n s . co m A-4.03 NEW WEST VIEW FEBRUARY.29.2024 WILDEST RESTAURANT 72990 EL PASEO #3 PALM DESERT CA. 92260 1204 Sheet: Scale: Date: TRI-PLEX CONDOMINIUM COMPLEX FOR 7 6 0 . 8 9 8 . 4 8 6 5 w w w . Z b r a u n d e s i g n s . c o m z a y d a @ z b r a u n d e s i g n s . co m A-4.04 NEW AERIAL VIEW FEBRUARY.29.2024 WILDEST RESTAURANT 72990 EL PASEO #3 PALM DESERT CA. 92260 1205 (E) F.F. 0"10'-0"20'-0" TRELLIS SYSTEM CONTAINER 40'-0" 46'-7" NEW PATIO ADDITION N8 N11 N8 N9 N5 (E) F.F. 0" EXISTING BUILDING 3'-4"9'-6"10'-0"9'-4"CONTAINER 8'-0" PROPOSED TRELLIS 40'-0" N5 NEW CURB PER CITY STANDARD, REFER TO CIVIL DRAWINGS NEW CONCRETE SIDEWALK TO BE A MIN. OF 4" THICK CONCRETE. NEW PLANTER, REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLAN. NEW TREE, REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLAN. NEW 40" RETAINING WALL TO BE 8"X8"X16" SINGLE CORE (BOTH SIDES) PRECISION BLOCK, COLOR: GREY MW & BLACK 250 MW BY ORCO. NEW ASPHALT SURFACE & CAR STALL STRIPING TO MATCH EXISTING NEW HERB GARDEN BOX PROPOSED HERB GARDEN WALL, MOUNTED ON CONTAINER. NEW 8FT WIDE X 6'8"H CONTAINER ROLLER DOOR TO BE A MIN OF 26" GA. STEEL WITH 5/8" CORRUGATION. PRIMED AND PAINT. PROVIDE WEATHER TIGHT FRAMING KIT, THRESHOLD AND HEADER. CONTAINER AND ROLLER DOORS TO BE COVERED WITH DECORATIVE GRAPHICS AS SHOWN ON MATERIAL BOARD EXISTING LIGHT POLE TO BE PROTECTED DURING CONSTRUCTION. NEW 3FT WIDE X 3FT HIGH CONTAINER STAND ROLL WINDOW TO BE A MIN OF 26" GA. STEEL WITH 5/8" CORRUGATION. PRIMED AND PAINT. PROVIDE WEATHER TIGHT FRAMING KIT, THRESHOLD AND HEADER. CONTAINER AND ROLLER DOORS TO BE COVERED WITH DECORATIVE GRAPHICS AS SHOWN ON MATERIAL BOARD NEW KEYNOTES N1 N2 N3 N4 N5 N6 N7 N8 N9 N10 N11 Sheet: Scale: Date: ADU FOR 7 6 0 . 8 9 8 . 4 8 6 5 w w w . Z b r a u n d e s i g n s . c o m z a y d a @ z b r a u n d e s i g n s . co m As indicated A-4.10 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS FEBRUARY.29.2024 WILDEST RESTAURANT 72990 EL PASEO #3 PALM DESERT CA. 92260 1/4" = 1'-0"1EAST ELEVATION 1/4" = 1'-0"2SOUTH ELEVATION 1206 C I T Y O F P A L M D E S E R T 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260-2578 TEL: 760-346-0611 INFO@CITYOFPALMDESERT.ORG CITY OF PALM DESERT PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE CASE NO. CUP23-0015 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, TO REVIEW A REQUEST BY CHARISSA FARLEY-HAY TO APPROVE A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION FOR AN OUTDOOR PATIO FOR DINING PURPOSES FOR AN EXISTING RESTAURANT AT 72990 EL PASEO, SUITE 3 The City of Palm Desert (City), in its capacity as the Lead Agency for this project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), finds that the proposed project is categorically exempt under Section 15301 Existing Facilities (Class 1) of the CEQA; therefore no further environmental review is necessary and a Notice of Exemption can be adopted as part of this project . PROJECT LOCATION/DESCRIPTION: PROJECT LOCATION: 72990 El Paseo, Suite #3 (Assessor’s Parcel Number: 640-170-013) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project is a Conditional Use Permit to allow for an existing restaurant to construct an attached, outdoor dining patio area. The plans include architecture and landscaping for the outdoor area including a trellis, storage structure, walls, pavers, and furniture. PUBLIC HEARING: NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, will hold a Public Hearing at its meeting on June 18, 2024. The Planning Commission meeting begins at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber at 73510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California. Pursuant to Assembly Bill 2449, this meeting may be conducted as a hybrid meeting allowing public access via teleconference or in person. Options for remote participation will be listed on the Posted Agenda for the meeting at: https://www.palmdesert.gov/our-city/committees-and- commissions/commission-information. PUBLIC REVIEW: The plans and related documents are available for public review Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. by contacting the project planner, Carlos Flores. Please submit written comments to the Planning Division. If any group challenges the action in court, issues raised may be limited to only those issues raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence at or prior to the Planning Commission hearing. All comments and any questions should be directed to: Carlos Flores, AICP, Principal Planner City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 (760) 776-6478 cflores@palmdesert.gov PUBLISH ONCE: RICHARD D. CANNONE, AICP, SECRETARY JUNE 7, 2024 PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION 1207 1208 Statutory Exemptions. State code number: _______________________________________________ Print Form Notice of Exemption Appendix E From: (Public Agency): ____________________________To: Office of Planning and Research P.O. Box 3044, Room 113 _______________________________________________Sacramento, CA 95812-3044 County Clerk (Address) ___________________________ ___________________________ County of: __________________ Project Title: ____________________________________________________________________________ Project Applicant: ________________________________________________________________________ Project Location - Specific: Project Location - City: ______________________ Project Location - County: Description of Nature, Purpose and Beneficiaries of Project: _____________________ Name of Public Agency Approving Project: _____________________________________________________ Name of Person or Agency Carrying Out Project: ________________________________________________ Exempt Status: (check one): Ministerial (Sec. 21080(b)(1); 15268); Declared Emergency (Sec. 21080(b)(3); 15269(a)); Emergency Project (Sec. 21080(b)(4); 15269(b)(c)); Reasons why project is exempt: Lead Agency Contact Person: ____________________________ Area Code/Telephone/Extension: _______________ If filed by applicant: 1.Attach certified document of exemption finding. 2.Has a Notice of Exemption been filed by the public agency approving the project? Yes No Signature: ____________________________ Date: Signed by Lead Agency Signed by Applicant Authority cited: Sections 21083 and 21110, Public Resources Code. Date Received for filing at OPR: Reference: Sections 21108, 21152, and 21152.1, Public Resources Code. _______________ Categorical Exemption. State type and section number: ____________________________________ ______________________________________________ ______________ Title: _______________________ Revised 2011 City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 Riverside 2724 Gateway Drive Riverside, CA 92507 CUP23-0015 Wildest Restaurant Outdoor Dining Charissa Farley-Hay 72990 El Paseo, Suite #3 (APN: 640-170-013) Palm Desert Riverside The proposal is a request by Charissa Farley-Hay (Applicant), for consideration of a Design Review to approve architecture and landscaping for an outdoor patio remodel for “Wildest Restaurant” (Restaurant), located at 72990 El Paseo, Suite #3 (Assessor’s Parcel Number: 640170013), within the Palms to Pines West Shopping Center. City of Palm Desert City of Palm Desert X Section 15301; Class 1 - Existing Facilities The application has complied with the requirements of the “City of Palm Desert Procedure for Implementation of CEQA” Resolution No. 2019-41, in that the Planning Commission finds that the Project is exempt from CEQA per Section 15301 of the State CEQA guidelines as the Project is an Article 19, Section 15301 Existing Facilities (Class 1) project. Class 1 consists of the operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, or minor alteration of existing public or private structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, or topographical features, involving negligible or no expansion of existing or former use. The expansion is in an area where all public services and facilities are available to allow for maximum development permissible in the General Plan and in an area that is not environmentally sensitive. Additionally, the Project is not subject to any of the exceptions for categorical exemptions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2. Carlos Flores, Principal Planner 7607766478 6/18/2024 Principal Planner n 1209 1210 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 23-0015 Wildest Restaurant PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 18, 2024 1 1211 Project Request Project Applicant: Charissa Farley-Hay, Applicant, is requesting Conditional Use Permit approval for an outdoor patio remodel for the “Wildest Restaurant” located at 72990 El Paseo, Suite #3, within the Palms to Pines West Shopping Center Case Number: CUP 23-0015 Project Description: The project scope requires CUP approval for expansion of the restaurant use and design review for the architecture and landscaping. The project Applicant has applied for a Conditional Use Permit for the project and is currently seeking Planning Commission approval. The Project is for a 2,977 sf outdoor permanent dining patio (2,233 sf of dining area) which would include: -a 20’ x 20’ pergola/trellis, -8’ x 40’ storage container, -fireplace, heaters, lighting, pavers, a wall, and landscaping on the perimeter and interior of the project. 26/18/2024 AGENDA ITEM 8C 1212 Vicinity Map 3 -The Restaurant occupies the south end of a commercial building within the Center. -The Building has two other commercial tenants and shares parking with four surrounding multitenant commercial building. -The restaurant utilizes existing parking spaces for a temporary outdoor dining area and seeks approval for a permanent outdoor dining area. Existing Uses General Plan Zoning Project Site Existing Commercial Regional Retail Planned Commercial –3 (P.C.-3), S.P. North Existing Commercial Regional Retail Planned Commercial –3 (P.C.-3), S.P. South Existing Residential Small Town Neighborhood Planned Residential –6 (PR-6) East Existing Commercial Regional Retail Planned Commercial –3 (P.C.-3), S.P. West Existing Commercial Regional Retail Planned Commercial –3 (P.C.-3), S.P. 6/18/2024 AGENDA ITEM 8C 1213 46/18/2024 AGENDA ITEM 8C 1214 56/18/2024 AGENDA ITEM 8C 1215 66/18/2024 AGENDA ITEM 8C 1216 76/18/2024 AGENDA ITEM 8C 1217 86/18/2024 AGENDA ITEM 8C 1218 96/18/2024 AGENDA ITEM 8C 1219 106/18/2024 AGENDA ITEM 8C 1220 116/18/2024 AGENDA ITEM 8C 1221 126/18/2024 AGENDA ITEM 8C 1222 136/18/2024 AGENDA ITEM 8C 1223 146/18/2024 AGENDA ITEM 8C 1224 156/18/2024 AGENDA ITEM 8C 1225 166/18/2024 AGENDA ITEM 8C 1226 Architectural Review Commission The Architectural Review Commission (ARC)of the City of Palm Desert considered the request and approved Case No.Design Review 23-0015 with the following conditions: 1.Roll up door shall be further studied and reviewed by staff regarding its maintainability or be replaced with swinging metal doors. 2.A pilaster with the same stone cladding on the building shall be added to the opening at the northeast corner of the patio. 3.Gravel placed in planters adjacent to the parking lot shall match existing parking lot gravel. 4.Shipping container shall be new or like-new condition. All of these conditions have been added as conditions of approval in the draft Resolution No.2875. 176/18/2024 AGENDA ITEM 8C 1227 CEQA The application has complied with the requirements of the “City of Palm Desert Procedure for Implementation of CEQA”Resolution No.2019-41,in that the Planning Commission finds that the Project is exempt from CEQA per Section 15301 of the State CEQA guidelines as the Project is an Article 19,Section 15301 Existing Facilities (Class 1)project.Class 1 consists of the operation, repair,maintenance,permitting,leasing,licensing,or minor alteration of existing public or private structures,facilities,mechanical equipment,or topographical features,involving negligible or no expansion of existing or former use.The expansion is in an area where all public services and facilities are available to allow for maximum development permissible in the General Plan and in an area that is not environmentally sensitive. Additionally, the Project is not subject to any of the exceptions for categorical exemptions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2 186/18/2024 AGENDA ITEM 8C 1228 Public Notice -Public noticing was conducted for this Planning Commission meeting per the requirements of the PDMC -A public hearing notice was published on Friday,June 7,2024,in The Desert Sun newspaper and mailed to all property owners within 300 feet of the project site. -No comments in favor or opposition have been received to date. 196/18/2024 AGENDA ITEM 8C 1229 Recommendation Adopt Planning Commission Resolution No.2875 entitled,“A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA,ADOPTING A NOTICE OF EXEMPTION PURSUANT TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA)AND APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP)FOR AN OUTDOOR PATIO FOR DINING PURPOSES FOR AN EXISTING RESTAURANT AT 72990 EL PASEO,SUITE 3” 206/18/2024 AGENDA ITEM 8C 1230 Year 2023 2023 2024 Total Total Month Jun Sep Jan Apr Date 20-Jun 4-Jul 18-Jul 1-Aug 15-Aug 5-Sep 19- 3-Oct 17-Oct 7-Nov 21-Nov 5-Dec 20-Dec 2-Jan 16- 2-Apr 4-Jun DeLuna, Nancy P P P P P P P P P P P - P P P 0 0 Greenwood, John E P P P P P P E P P P - P P P 2 0 Gregory, Ron P P P P P P E P P P P - P P E 2 0 Holt, Lindsay P E P P P P R P E P E - P P P 5 0 Pradetto, Joseph P P P P E E P P P P P - P P P 2 0 Present Absent Excused Remote Study SessionNo - Palm Desert Municipal Code 2.34.010: Twice Monthly: Six unexcused absences from regular meetings in any twelve-month period shall constitute an automatic resignation of members holding office on boards that meet twice monthly. P A E R SS - E - - E - - - P - P - - P - - - P - P - - P - - - P - P - - P - - - P Excused Absences Unexcused Absences6-Feb 20-Feb 5-Mar 19-Mar 16-Apr 7-May 21-May - P - - P - - - P JunJulAugOctNovDecFeb Mar May PLANNING COMMISSION ATTENDANCE REPORT 2024 ROLLING 12-MONTH REPORT 20242023 2023 2023 2023 2023 2024 2024 2024 2024 1231