HomeMy WebLinkAboutGeneral Plan Public Hearing 02-05-2004 CITY OF PALM DESERT
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
°
ii1, '�.Zo'4 =�-'���: STAFF REPORT
.qo� �a 3y , .
SUBJECT: General Plan Public Hearing Agenda
SUBMITTED BY: Phil Drell, Director of Community Development
DATE: February 5, 2004
I. LAND USE
A. Comparative Land Use Analysis - University Park and existing developed
area south of Frank Sinatra
B. University Park Public Reserve Analysis (If completed.)
C. North 1-10 Planning Area
II. URBAN DESIGN ELEMENT- New program concerning office professional design
standards in residential corridors.
III. CIRCULATION ELEMENT AND TRAFFIC ANALYSIS
IV. OVERVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES, HAZARDS AND PUBLIC
SERVICE ELEMENTS (As time permits.)
V. ADJOURN TO FEBRUARY 19, 2004 AT 2:00 P.M.
Submitted by: Approv .
Phil rell Ho er Cr
Director of Community Development ACM for D lopment Services
Approval:
Car os L. Ort a
City Manager
-s
Cost/Benefit Analysis for the University Park Planning Area, Planning Commission Recommendation
REVENUES
Property Tax(1)
Unit Type New Units Value/Unit Total New Total Tax/County Tax/City
Single Family 2,162 325,000 702,650,000 702,650,000 7,026,500 498,882
Apartments 2,178 75,000 163,350,000 163,350,000 1,633,500 115,979
Commercial Square Feet Total Value Tax/County Tax/City
7,009,245 665,878,275 6,658,783 472,774
Industrial Square Feet Total Value Tax/County Tax/City
3,588,607 269,145,525 2,691,455 191,093
Total Prop Tax , $ 1,278,727
Sales Tax(2)
Gross Square Sales Tax to
Land Use Feet Net Square Feet Per SF Sales($) Total Sales City
Regional 2,990,505 2,840,980 222 631,265,700 6,312,657
Community 406,656 386,323 225 86,918,857 869,189
Neighborhood - - 221 - -
Total Sales Tax $ 7,181,846
Shadow Ridge Fees by Agreement(3)
1000 Rooms - - Total Shadow Ridge Fees $ 2,946,051
Motor Vehicle in lieu fees(4)
Population Per capita($) Fee to City
10,546 45.54 480,274
Total Motor Vehicle Fees $ 480,274
Franchise Fees(4)
Population Per capita ($) Fee to City
10,546 47.82 504,319
Total Franchise Fees $ 504,319
Charges(4)
Population Per capita ($) Fee to City
10,546 78.24 825,135
Total Charges $ 825,135
TOTAL GROSS REVENUES $ 13,216,351
COSTS (5)
Population Per capita ($) Cost to City
10,546 724.72 7,643,042 TOTAL COSTS $ 7,643,042
ANNUAL NET REVENUE $ 5,573,309
REDEVELOPMENT TAX INCREMENT
Total Valuation Total Increment Housing Set-aside Pass-throughs
1,805,953,867 18,075,905 3,615,905 6,781,406 Net Tax Increment to City $ 7,678,594
Notes
(1)Assumes that the City continues to receive 7%of the property tax collected by the County.
(2)Assumes that the City receives 1%of the sales tax revenue.
(3)Based on Development Agreement adopted by City.
(4)Per capita calculations based on 2002 City General Fund revenues and population.See EIR page III-195 and III-196 for details.
(5)Per capita costs are based on 2002 budget General Fund expenditures and population. Includes costs for general government,fire and police.
Job Generation in the University Park Planning Area
Gross SF or
Land Use Rooms Net SF Jobs Generated
C-C Community Commercial 1,450,561 1,378,033 4,593
C-R Regional Commercial 2,990,505 2,840,980 9,470
C-OP Office Professional 273,761 260,073 1,111
M-U Mixed Use 201,737 191,650 639
C-RS Resort Commercial 1,000 1,000 750
Commercial Subtotal - 16,564
B-P Business Park 3,588,607 3,409,177 5,929
Grand Total 22,493
Population Generated within University Parl 10,546
Employed Population (42%) 4,429
Net Jobs Generated 18,063
-
t City of Palm Desert
I
-
4 3.a —?+ 16
^i`
T#-SR
1 — - City Limits -
:Z1111 2? General Plan 2000
z 4
10 I .?I' ,p� ` Planning Commission
i „....ji�qrF y T Recommended Alternative
1� — DINAH- HORE- RN`���0 .�ip -_' ! ' . ' � 1 I t, February 4,2004
j
ye...,,,,e, ,
,
6
, ,.,,
3 • gII'1 ...I -
4 1 — LI In 9
iso ___. 11
i_
z _ il
, _,,,.,
...
,, ,
iE 10
I I R-GERALDjIOR D - _ =h-i 11./__O m 11. $ . ..
51 I 1 36 31 J2 33— y ��FrP
1
r Tlci9414
.' ��
e 7
ill ,,,,
e ` \ FRANK*SINATRA R ..<NT
62
Ow
I 3 s =J � � 3 O 110,111
— I - �\ ' 10
t
`A
�' Q tIENJi
nCOUNTRYCLU BDR -- _----- -.-f>'--j--I - I 2 IIK
I O ` _ I
1 11. �� 1�J ~ 5 I 5r� O ?1 V $12 j
1 . HOVLEY LN E _..13- , 1. 1a;1
0 , -
i-
-- -i j _ ' q -- - - - HOVLEY LN E - _
1 . 4."`"k ligr Ilrellet 1 , yr ;, 1 0
i ililifill111111111111111 --- ;11 ' '4
1 i \ 1 cl I MAGNESIA FALLS DR 'R i_ I re I
—
b (i) i i w
----
--PARK-VIEW DR P {{Q I I
__ _T1 } O Q z v' " re or w - a 0 .,L1 !. . 6 , '^ I I CALIFORN' 13 , -
m g 4 FRED WARING DR^ ----------FRED-WARING DR---------'
,,,)
0 v CO , a o i Legend
r:�!! _ —
2d '` ` 1 - I Residential Land Uses
-STATEHWY111' ® ( , MouMamEAates(R-ME)a1dW20ac
MOUNTAIN DR 1-I.,
I r I Desert Estates(R-DE)01 du/10 ac
1 - `.--r" O 1
',--F- , T Hillside Reserve(R-HR)1 du/5 ac
E ch Q 1 w F 1 f Low Density(R-L)0-4 du/ac
/� yQ r Q FAIRWAY DR , 1
h,-, 1 Medium Density(R-M)4-10 du/ac
I
E=GRAPEVINST p I High Densely(R-H)10-22 du/ac
1
J/ �~a, I I Commercial/Industrial/Business Land Uses
■� 4 . , Regional Commeraal(GR)
Jr
`�A�� ' 1 1 1 1 I -Community Commeraal(C-C)
. ... YSTACKaRD.... 1 1 _General Commeraal(C-G)
l'. I I I MI Neighborhood Commercial(C-N)
' - T— I -IL Resort Commercial(C-RS)
w i — — — — — —
Q
.Y/ •e•• Mixed Use(MU)-Commeraal/High Density(R-H)10-22 dWac
I
- MESA VIEW DR 90RT0'•-P' I I Office Professional(COP)
- - j ( I
1 Office Professional(C-OP)/Medium Density(R-M)410 du/ac
oitilliiiiij /.4(....6}-4.L.V
I d i 3 3 3 4 I Office Professional(C-OP)/High Density(R-H)10-22 du/ac
Zr—i 1 j IIn dust a-Business Pak(I-BP)
j I Industrial-Light(I-L)
1 Z
l Other Land Uses
)1 1V� i��.\ ,��\ 1 Public/Quasi-Public Fadfities(PF)
I I I Public Facility/School(PF/S)
I I , 1
- ib �' �\ I I 1 Public Facility/University(PFN)
?. r ---_I------ 11 '.t j 4 , 3 I Open Space-Parks(OS/PP)
I I Open Space-Public Reserves(OS/PR)
• j I I 1 Open Space-Private(OS/PV)
iI i i -Open Space-Waterway(OS/FW)
'—• -— — — + i-Fro sway(FWW)
•
I [IMMO Study Zone(S)
C_—_-1 City Boundary
1_s 1 i 1(
N
, • '" ', , , , ,, ,, ,. , -..,, ,.. , ,, ,, - - •(- t ( I W.-I.
1
0 05 1
- _ Map Prepared on February 4,2004
Alli by the City of Palm Desert