Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPost-Meeting Agenda Package - StudySession_Sep12_2024 PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL, SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE PALM DESERT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, HOUSING AUTHORITY, AND BOARD OF LIBRARY TRUSTEES STUDY SESSION MEETING STUDY SESSION POST-MEETING AGENDA Thursday, September 12, 2024 2:00 p.m. Council Chamber, City Hall 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, California NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the purpose of the Study Session is to review the items listed on the agenda. No action will be taken. This is a joint meeting of the Palm Desert City Council, Successor Agency to the Palm Desert Redevelopment Agency, Palm Desert Housing Authority, and Palm Desert Board of Library Trustees. Pursuant to Assembly Bill 2449, this meeting may be conducted as a hybrid meeting allowing public access via teleconference or in person, and up to two Councilmembers may attend remotely. WATCH THE MEETING LIVE: Watch the City Council meeting live at the City’s website: https://palmdesert.zoom.us/ or on the City's YouTube Channel. OPTIONS FOR PARTICIPATING IN THIS MEETING: Send your comments by email to: CouncilMeetingComments@palmdesert.gov. Emails received prior to 10:00 a.m. on the day of the City Council meeting will be made part of the record and distributed to the City Council. Emails will not be read aloud at the meeting. Pages 1.CALL TO ORDER - STUDY SESSION 2.STUDY SESSION TOPICS 2.a UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE INTRODUCTION 3 2.b POLICY DISCUSSION ON PROPOSED TEXT AMENDMENTS TO PALM DESERT MUNICIPAL CODE TITLE 26, (SUBDIVISIONS) AND TITLE 27 (GRADING) 25 2.c PROPOSED TEXT AMENDMENT TO PALM DESERT MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 2.18 BUILDING BOARD OF APPEALS 45 2.d DRAFT POLICY CLRK-002: THREATS OF VIOLENCE DIRECTED TOWARDS COUNCIL MEMBERS AND CANDIDATES, AND CONSIDERATION OF FIREARMS RESTRICTIONS ON CITY PROPERTY 53 3.ADJOURNMENT 4.PUBLIC NOTICES NOTE: Pursuant to Assembly Bill 2449, this meeting may be conducted by teleconference. Study Session is accessible in person or on the City’s website: www.palmdesert.gov under the Council Agenda link at the top of the page. Agenda Related Materials: Pursuant to Government Code §54957.5(b)(2) the designated office for inspection of records in connection with this meeting is the Office of the City Clerk, Palm Desert Civic Center, 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert. Staff reports for all agenda items considered in open session, and documents provided to a majority of the legislative bodies are available for public inspection at City Hall and on the City’s website at www.palmdesert.gov by clicking “Council Agenda” at the top of the page. Americans with Disabilities Act: It is the intention of the City of Palm Desert to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) in all respects. If, as an attendee or a participant at this meeting, or in meetings on a regular basis, you will need special assistance beyond what is normally provided, the City will attempt to accommodate you in every reasonable manner. Please contact the Office of the City Clerk, (760) 346-0611, at least 48 hours prior to the meeting to inform us of your needs and to determine if accommodation is feasible. AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING I, Níamh M. Ortega, Assistant City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert, do hereby certify, under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California, that the foregoing agenda for the Palm Desert City Council, Successor Agency for the Palm Desert Redevelopment Agency, and Housing Authority, was posted on the City Hall bulletin board and City website www.palmdesert.gov no less than 72 hours prior to the meeting. /S/ Níamh M. Ortega Assistant City Clerk City Council Study Session 2 Page 1 of 1 CITY OF PALM DESERT STAFF REPORT MEETING DATE: September 12, 2024 PREPARED BY: Nick Melloni, AICP, Principal Planner SUBJECT: STUDY SESSION: UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE INTRODUCTION RECOMMENDATION: Provide feedback on the presentation by Clarion Associates on the Unified Development Code Update and direct to staff to form a City Council Subcommittee for the Update. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: On June 27, 2024, the City Council awarded a contract to Clarion Associates to develop a Unified Development Code for the City of Palm Desert (PD UDC). Currently, land development regulations are located within, but not limited to, Title 24 Environmental and Conservation, Title 25 Zoning, Title 26 Subdivisions, Title 27 Grading, and Title 28 Flood Damage Prevention. A Unified Development Code (UDC) combines traditional zoning and subdivision ordinances, as well as other City regulations such as grading, design review, and stormwater management, into a single document. The intent of combining these regulations is to streamline and coordinate development processes by removing inconsistencies and outdated development policies. Part of the scope of the PD UDC includes initial project meetings wi th City staff and local stakeholders. Clarion Associates has prepared a presentation to introduce the project to the City Council. Staff recommends the City Council appoint two members of the City Council to an Ad Hoc Subcommittee to review public drafts of the various work products throughout the entire project. A companion staff report regarding these appointments is listed on the September 12, 2024, Action Calendar. Legal Review: This report has been reviewed by the City Attorney’s office. FINANCIAL IMPACT: There is no financial impact related to this item. ATTACHMENT: 1. Presentation 3 4 CITY OF PALM DESERT Unified Development Code Project Kickoff September 2024 5 PROJECT TEAM 6 CLARION ASSOCIATES •National consulting practice with 30+ years experience •Multi-disciplinary: Planners, attorneys, landscape architects •Offices in Denver and Chapel Hill •Focus on plan implementation and user-friendly codes •Award-winning, innovative codes integrating traditional and form-based approaches •Recent California experience: Berkeley, Pasadena, Long Beach, Sacramento County Palm Desert, California I Unified Development Code 7 PROJECT TEAM Project Manager Matt Goebel Project Principal Jenny Baker Graphics & Marketing Holly White Project Associate Maggie Squyer Palm Desert, California I Unified Development Code 8 IMPLEMENTING THE PLAN Palm Desert, California I Unified Development Code 9 ABOUT THE PROJECT 10 PROJECT TIMELINE Consolidated Draft 4 Unified Development Code Adoption 1 Project Orientation 2 Issue Identification and Zoning Code Analysis 3 Draft New Unified Development Code Initial Project Meetings Public Participation Plan Background Document Review Zoning Districts & Uses Development Standards Administration & Procedures Signs Public Hearings & Workshops Final UDC Project Branding Initial Committee Meetings Zoning Code Analysis Annotated Outline Testing Sept-Oct 2024 Nov 2024-Jan 2025 Feb 2025-Jun 2026 July-Sept 2026 Palm Desert, California I Unified Development Code 11 CODE ASSESSMENTS Palm Desert, California I Unified Development Code 12 CODE ASSESSMENTS Main report Detailed supporting table Palm Desert, California I Unified Development Code 13 LISTENING TO THE PUBLIC Stakeholder input •Residents •Development community •Other stakeholders •City staff Arrange in-person participation and virtual opportunities Design online survey and other digital interactive platforms https://www.engagepalmdesert.com/development-code Palm Desert, California I Unified Development Code 14 KEY ISSUES 15 IMPLEMENT THE PLANS Does the UDC support the plan’s Guiding Principles? Palm Desert, California I Unified Development Code 16 CLARITY AND ORGANIZATION Palm Desert, California I Unified Development Code 17 ZONING DISTRICTS Review existing zoning districts: ▪Are new districts needed to enable desired development forms? ▪Adjustments to existing districts? ▪Do dimensional standards need to be revised? ▪How well are special districts and overlays working? Palm Desert, California I Unified Development Code 18 USE REGULATIONS Review allowed uses for: ▪New uses that need to be added (data centers, doggie day care, “creator” spaces) ▪Obsolete uses that can be removed ▪Are existing land use conditions working? New ones needed? ▪Updates to permissions ▪Allow more widely, subject to use-specific standards (land use conditions)? ▪Require specific use permit? ▪Change to prohibited Palm Desert, California I Unified Development Code 19 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Address the quality of development, including standards for: ▪Access and connectivity ▪Landscaping and screening ▪Building and site design ▪Outdoor lighting ▪Parking and loading ▪Compatibility and transition (commercial/residential) Palm Desert, California I Unified Development Code 20 REVIEW PROCEDURES Assess whether: •Procedure matches practice? •Standards are adequately detailed to lead to predictable outcomes? •Each procedure has objective approval criteria? •Review procedures are standardized and streamlined?​ Palm Desert, California I Unified Development Code 21 RECOMMENDATION •Staff recommends the City Council appoint two members of the City Council to an Ad Hoc Subcommittee to review public drafts of the various work products throughout the entire project. ​ •A companion staff report for these appointments is listed on the September 12, 2024, action calendar. Palm Desert, California I Unified Development Code 22 QUESTIONS & DISCUSSION Any other questions about the project scope or process? 23 CITY OF PALM DESERT Unified Development Code Project Kickoff September 2024 24 Page 1 of 3 CITY OF PALM DESERT STAFF REPORT MEETING DATE: September 12, 2024 PREPARED BY: Nick Melloni, AICP, Principal Planner SUBJECT: STUDY SESSION: POLICY DISCUSSION ON PROPOSED TEXT AMENDMENTS TO PALM DESERT MUNICIPAL CODE TITLE 26, (SUBDIVISIONS) AND TITLE 27 (GRADING) RECOMMENDATION: Provide feedback on the proposed policy and text amendments to Palm Desert Municipal Code Title 26 (Subdivisions) and Title 27 (Grading). BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: Title 26 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code (“PMDC”) regulates the land subdivision in the city and outlines the procedures for administering and implementing the State Subdivision Map Act (“Map Act"). Title 27 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code establishes minimum requirements for grading and sets forth the procedures for permit issuance and enforcement of grading requirements. Both Titles were originally adopted in 1976 and have been revised on an as - needed basis in response to updates in state legislation or development-related issues. Development Services staff, in collaboration with the City Attorney’s Office, is working on a comprehensive amendment to the Titles to align with current best practices and state law requirements. This update precedes the update for the Unified Development Code (“UDC”) update, which is scheduled for completion in 2026. Staff is seeking input from the City Council on several policy updates related to subdivision and grading procedures and design requirements, as outlined below: POLICY UPDATES TO TITLE 26 SUBDIVISIONS 1. Senate Bill 684 Implementation: In 2023 the California Legislature adopted Senate Bill 684 (SB 684) to streamline the approval process development projects of 10 or fewer residential units on urban lots under 5 acres, as governed by the Subdivision Map Act. SB 684 mandates that the City must ministerially consider, without discretionary review or a public hearing, a parcel map or a tentative and final map for housing development projects that meets specified requirements. Staff recommendation: Expand the discretion of the City Engineer and Development Services Director to approve Tentative Parcel Maps, Conditional Certificates of Compliance, Lot Line Adjustments, and administrative Tract Maps in accordance with SB 684. Additionally, establish the necessary procedures and objective standards to maintain local control under this new legislation. The objective standards would include objective development standards (e.g., setbacks, building heights) that do not conflict with SB 684, 25 City of Palm Desert Study Session – Title 26 Subdivisions and Title 27 Grading Page 2 of 3 objective subdivision standards of the subdivision map act, and objective design standards contained in the City’s Multifamily and Mixed-use Objective Design Standards. POLICY UPDATES TO TITLE 27 GRADING 1. Clarify that no grading permit shall be issued prior to final tract map approval It is standard practice that a grading permit is not issued for a site until the final tract map has been approved by the City Council. However, conflicting provisions in the current code create ambiguity around this process. Staff recommends removing these conflicting provisions to ensure clarity. Staff recommendation: Require that if a final tract map is required or approved for a site, no grading permit shall be issued until the final map has been approved by the City Council. 2. Establish design requirements for grading adjacent to existing development One of the primary purposes of the Grading Ordinance is to ensure that the development of land occurs in a manner most compatible with surrounding areas. In areas where infill development is possible, the absence of clear criteria for compatibility can lead to uncertainty for stakeholders, prolonged discretionary processes, and undesirable development outcomes. To align with the goals and policies of the General Plan, grading elevations and slopes between adjacent developments should be regulated to promote compatibility. Staff Recommendation: Establish a requirement limiting the finished grade and slopes of new developments in relation to the finished elevations of existing developments. Exceptions may be made if a finding is made that the proposed elevation is necessary to protect public health, safety, and welfare, with additional considerations for hillside areas of the City. 3. Control of Building Pad Elevation Currently, Section 27.12.045(C) of the Palm Desert Municipal Code governs the approved building pad elevation of new developments associated with a Tentative Map. This section stipulates that any deviation of more than six inches (6") from the preliminary approval must be reviewed by the Director of Development Services, based on a recommendation from the City Engineer. The Director may also choose to refer the request to the Planning Commission for further consideration at their discretion. Staff recommendation: Remove the six-inch (6”) threshold and require that all deviations in building pad elevation be jointly reviewed and approved by the City Engineer and Director of Development Services. 4. Regulation of Stockpiling Currently, stockpiling is regulated by Palm Desert Municipal Code Section 27.28.155(A). Due to the potential nuisances that can arise from the temporary stockpiling of earthen materials, expanded regulations are recommended to mitigate these issues . 26 City of Palm Desert Study Session – Title 26 Subdivisions and Title 27 Grading Page 3 of 3 Staff recommendation: Expand the regulatory requirements for the stockpiling approval by implementing certain measures including: 1. Requiring a dedicated stockpiling permit. 2. Require erosion control plans prepared by a registered civil engineer. 3. Prohibit the acceptance of stockpile permit applications prior to map or project approval, including applicable environmental review 4. Establish criteria to control stockpile placement and mitigate visual impacts. 5. Require applicants enter into an agreement with the City, secured by a cash deposit, to ensure the timely removal or permanent placement of stockpiled material. Based on City Council input, City staff will incorporate these policy modifications and conduct necessary outreach activities before returning with the proposed ordinances. Legal Review: This report has been reviewed by the City Attorney’s office. FINANCIAL IMPACT: There is no financial impact related to this item. ATTACHMENT: 1. Study Session PowerPoint 27 28 Study Session: Subdivisions and Grading PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL SEPTEMBER 12, 2024 9/12/2024 CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION 1 29 Why are we here? ▪Historically, the City has relied on discretionary processes to regulate design and development (Design Review, discretion by staff and Commissions, Precise Plan). ▪Recent state legislation (SB 330 - Housing Crisis Act, Housing Accountability Act, SB 35, SB 9, SB 684) mandates ministerial (i.e., by-right) approvals for certain housing developments ▪Only objective standards are enforceable. ▪Lack of enforceable objective standards can, and has resulted in: ▪Inconsistent outcomes for development ▪Project designs which do not meet decision-maker and resident values and expectations ▪Increased timelines for development review and approval 9/12/2024 CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION 2 30 Objectives Provide input on Staff’s recommended Subdivision and Grading Ordinance Amendments ▪Title 26 – Subdivisions ▪Implement new mandated State Housing Law requirements for administrative tract map approval ▪Establish administrative review procedures for certain actions (Tentative Parcel Maps) ▪Title 27 – Grading ▪Clarify procedures for grading permit issuance ▪Align design requirements with General Plan Policy ▪Implement resident expectations ▪Enhance existing regulations for stockpiling 9/12/2024 CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION 3 31 Policy #1 – Senate Bill 684 Implementation Issue #1: New State Housing Law – Streamlined Subdivision Approval. Aimed at promoting “starter homes” for small lot subdivisions and townhouse/condominium developments. Eligibility: ▪Multifamily zoning ▪Existing parcel less than 5 acres ▪Subdivision creating 10 lots or fewer. ▪Lots that are no smaller than 600 square-feet. Issue #2: Code establish limited framework for administrative approvals. Many mapping actions require Planning Commission approval. Recommendation #1: Establish criteria for SB 684. Expand discretion of the City Engineer and Development Services Director to approve certain mapping actions such as Tentative Parcel Maps. 9/12/2024 CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION 4 32 Policy #2 – Grading Permit Issuance Issue: The ordinance is unclear and conflicting regarding the timing of issuance of a grading permit when a mapping action is involved Typical practice in many jurisdictions is to issue grading permits only after a final map is approved. ▪This ensures grading improvements are guaranteed by agreements and securities Conflicting provision allows interpretation that grading permits can be issued prior to map approval. ▪Less secure for City Recommendation: Require that if a final tract map is required, or approved for a site, no grading permit shall be issued until the final map has been approved by the City Council. 9/12/2024 CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION 5 33 Policy #3 – Design Requirements for Building Pad Elevations Issue: The ordinance contains subjective language regarding “compatibility” of building pad elevations subject to staff discretion. ▪Not enforceable under state mandates. ▪No clear criteria identifying design the City expects ▪Sensitive transition of heights are desired between new development and existing development. Recommendation: Establish a grading pad elevation transition standard for infill developments, adjacent to existing residential. For new infill developments which abut existing (including approved) residential, the finished pad elevation of the new development cannot exceed 5’-0” above the existing finished grade at property line. Exceptions may be permissible for pad elevations necessitated by life safety factors such as drainage, on-site retention, and stability (soils) Exception for “Master Planned” developments. 9/12/2024 CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION 6 34 Policy #3 – Context The Palm Desert Objective Design Standards for Multi-family and Mixed-Use Development adopted in May 2024, established a transition standard for heights of buildings adjoining developments with lower elevations (see below Standards 4.12) In the Coachella Valley, City of La Quinta establishes a grading improvement standard for subdivisions where the building pad elevation differential between lots does not exceed five feet. 9/12/2024 CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION 7 35 9/12/2024 CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION 8 The Enclave at Gerald Ford Drive and Gateway Drive looking south The Enclave at A Street and Gateway Drive looking north Policy #3 – Context 36 9/12/2024 CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION 9 Perimeter Retaining Wall on Dolce Avenue near Gateway Drive looking east Perimeter Retaining Wall on Dolce Avenue moving east towards Cortesia Way Policy #3 – Context 37 9/12/2024 CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION 10 Policy #3 – Context Terraced retaining walls – Gateway Drive Looking northwest toward Dinah Shore Drive Pads below street retaining walls – Gateway Drive Looking northeast towards existing business park 38 9/12/2024 CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION 11 Policy #3 – Context TR 36351 (“Sage”) – Example Transition TR 36351 (“Sage”) – Example Transition – 2:1 Slope – 12’ Grade difference 39 9/12/2024 CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION 12 Policy #3 – Context TR 36351 (“Sage”) – Example Transition TR 36351 (“Sage”) – Example Transition – 2:1 Slope – 15’ Grade difference + 6’ - 7’ block wall 40 9/12/2024 CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION 13 Policy #3 – Context Urban Crossings South property line Monterey Ridge at eastern boundary 41 Policy #4 – Control of building Pad Elevation Issue: PDMC 27.12.045(C) requires pad elevations shown on preliminary grading remain consistent on final plans Deviations of 6” or greater require approval by the City Engineer and Development Services Director. Recommendation – Require any deviation be granted approval by the City Engineer and Development Services Director with ability to forward to the Planning Commission. 9/12/2024 CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION 14 42 Policy #5 – Stockpiling Regulation Issue: City has existing standards for stockpiling. Expanded regulations will result in improved clarity of process and City expectations. Recommendation: Implement best practice regulations for stockpiling ◦Dedicated Stockpile permit ◦Erosion control ◦Timing of stockpile (6 months) ◦Criteria for placement and visual impact ◦Securities and agreements for removal or permanent placement 9/12/2024 CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION 15 43 Questions and discussion 9/12/2024 CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION 16 44 Page 1 of 2 CITY OF PALM DESERT STAFF REPORT MEETING DATE: September 12, 2024 PREPARED BY: Richard D. Cannone, AICP, Development Services Director SUBJECT: STUDY SESSION: PROPOSED TEXT AMENDMENT TO PALM DESERT MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 2.18 BUILDING BOARD OF APPEALS RECOMMENDATION: Provide feedback on proposed text amendments to the Palm Desert Municipal Code Chapter 2.18, Building Board of Appeals. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: A recent appeal of the Building Official’s application of the Building Code related to emergency egress to the Building Board of Appeals, and subsequent appeal of the Building Board of Appeal’s decision to City Council, uncovered an inconsistency regarding what can be appealed. The Building Board of Appeals, is the body that hears appeals on decisions made by the Building Official; however, it does not include language prohibiting an appeal of a ministerial action or an action that does not involve the exercise of administrative discretion or personal judgment, as is the case with appeals that go directly to City Council. To resolve this inconsistency and provide a general clean-up of PDMC Chapter 2.18, staff proposes the following amendments: 1. Clarify Appeal Procedures: The strict enforcement of a building code standard by the Building Official would no longer be appealable, because it does not include any discretion or personal judgement and would align the procedures with appeals that go directly to City Council. 2. Board Membership Requirement: Require that members possess a thorough understanding of the California Building Code and related city regulations and ordinances. 3. Clarify Decision Authority: Include a new section to clarify the following: a. The Building Board of Appeals has no authority to waive requirements of any code, which is consistent with California Building Code Section 113.2. b. The Building Board of Appeals shall either approve, approve with modifications, or deny the appeal, and shall specify any conditions or limitations imposed. c. The decision of the Building Board of Appeals shall be final, and a written decision shall be sent to the appellant informing them that they may file an appeal with the California Building Standards Commission (CBSC) pursuant to California Administrative Code Section 1-303(a). This appeal procedure allows an individual to file an appeal directly to CBSC, and not in conjunction with the City. The CBSC is not obligated to act on or consider the appeal and may choose to either review or reject it. Given the technical nature of the California Building Code, the intent of the proposed amendment is two-fold, it establishes a realistic expectation of what can be appealed and streamlines the 45 City of Palm Desert Building Board of Appeals Code Amendment Page 2 of 2 appeal process so that should an individual wish to appeal the Building Board of Appeals , the matter can be directly appealed to the CBSC. If the appeal of the Building Board is heard by City Council, a ruling in favor of the appellant would most likely require consideration by CBSC before the action is final. Legal Review: This report has been reviewed by the City Attorney’s office. FINANCIAL IMPACT: There is no financial impact related to this item. ATTACHMENT: 1. Presentation 46 BUILDING BOARD OF APPEALS CODE UPDATE CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION SEPTEMBER 12, 2024 47 Purpose The purpose of the proposed update is two-fold: 1.Establish a realistic expectation of what can be appealed. 09/12/2024 STUDY SESSION -BUILDING BOARD OF APPEALS 2 2.Streamline the appeal process. •Building Board of Appeals (BBA) final decision •Appeal of BBA may be appealed to the California Building Standards Commission 48 Recommendation 1.Clarify Appeal Procedures The strict enforcement of a building code standard by the Building Official would no longer be appealable. o Aligns with the appeal procedures for City Council Cannot appeal a ministerial decision that does not involve the exercise of administrative discretion or personal judgment. 2.Update Board Membership Requirement Require that members possess a thorough understanding of the California Building Code and related city regulations and ordinances. 09/12/2024 STUDY SESSION -BUILDING BOARD OF APPEALS 3 49 Recommendation 3.Clarify Decision Authority BBA has no authority to waive requirements of any code, which is consistent with California Building Code Section 113.2. BBA shall either approve, approve with modifications, or deny the appeal, and shall specify any conditions or limitations imposed. BBA decision shall be final, and a written decision shall be sent to the appellant informing them that they may file an appeal with the CBSC pursuant to California Administrative Code Section 1-303(a). o This appeal procedure allows an individual to file an appeal directly to CBSC, and not in conjunction with the City. o The CBSC is not obligated to act on or consider the appeal and may choose to either review or reject it. 09/12/2024 STUDY SESSION -BUILDING BOARD OF APPEALS 4 50 Discussion 09/12/2024 STUDY SESSION -BUILDING BOARD OF APPEALS 5 51 52 Page 1 of 2 CITY OF PALM DESERT STAFF REPORT MEETING DATE: August 22, 2024 PREPARED BY: Anthony J. Mejia, City Clerk SUBJECT: STUDY SESSION: DRAFT POLICY CLRK-002: THREATS OF VIOLENCE DIRECTED TOWARDS COUNCIL MEMBERS AND CANDIDATES, AND CONSIDERATION OF FIREARMS RESTRICTIONS ON CITY PROPERTY RECOMMENDATION: 1. Provide feedback on the draft Policy CLRK-002: Threats of Violence directed towards Council Members and Candidates. 2. Provide feedback on whether staff should explore the development of an ordinance that prohibits all firearms, including those held by Concealed Weapon Permit holders, on City property. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The proposed Policy CLRK-002 was developed to establish formal protocols for handling and responding to threats of violence directed toward Council Members and Candidates. This policy includes procedures for reporting threats, involving law enforcement, and ensuring confidentiality. The policy comes in response to recent threats directed at a Council Member. While these threats have gained public attention, the City is committed to handling them discreetly, in compliance with legal guidelines and best practices for public safety. The key provisions of Policy CLRK-002 include: 1. Immediate Reporting: Council Members, Candidates, and staff must immediately report any threats to the City Manager and law enforcement. 2. Law Enforcement Involvement: Law enforcement will assess the risk and determine the necessary actions, including potential investigations and protective measures. 3. Confidentiality: All details of the threats will be kept confidential and shared only with necessary personnel to ensure the safety of those involved. 4. Facility Access Control: Guidelines are established to limit unauthorized access to City Hall during off-hours to minimize vulnerabilities. 5. Training: Regular training will be conducted for relevant staff and officials to ensure preparedness for handling threats. 6. Public Communication: The City Manager or designee, in coordination with law enforcement, will handle any necessary public communication regarding threats, ensuring that investigations and individual safety are not compromised. The policy is aligned with the City’s Workplace Violence Prevention Plan (WVPP) and complies with state regulations, including SB 553, which mandates proactive measures for preventing workplace violence. 53 City of Palm Desert Policy on Threats of Violence Directed Towards Council Members and Candidates Page 2 of 2 In response to recent events, City staff researched California laws and found that California Penal Code Section 171b prohibits individuals from bringing or possessing firearms and other specified weapons into state or local public buildings. Additionally, Palm Desert Municipal Code Chapter 2.52 (Workplace Policies) prohibits City employees from possessing firearms or other weapons on City property. However, these provisions do not explicitly prohibit holders of Concealed Weapon Permits from carrying concealed firearms on City property. Due to the heightened security concerns from recent events, staff is seeking direction on whether to further research the possibility of enacting an ordinance that would prohibit all firearms, including those carried by CWP holders, on City property. Legal Review: This report has been reviewed by the City Attorney’s Office. FINANCIAL IMPACT: There is no financial impact associated with this action. ATTACHMENT: 1. Policy CLRK-002, Threats of Violence Directed Towards Council Members and Candidates 54 CITY OF PALM DESERT ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES Subject THREATS OF VIOLENCE DIRECTED TOWARD COUNCILMEMBERS AND CANDIDATES Policy No. CLRK-002 Date Approved: Amended: Approved by Resolution No. 2024-____ Authored by Anthony J. Mejia, City Clerk I. PURPOSE To establish a protocol for responding to threats of violence received by or directed toward Council Members and Candidates. II. SCOPE This policy applies to all City staff and officials who may become aware of threats of violence directed at Council Members or Candidates. This policy supplements the Workplace Violence Prevention Plan which would otherwise exclude candidates. III. DEFINITIONS A. Candidate: An individual who has filed the necessary paperwork and is actively campaigning for election to the Palm Desert City Council, in compliance with applicable election laws and regulations. B. Confidentiality: The obligation to keep all details related to threats, investigations, and protective measures private and to share such information only with authorized individuals as necessary for the safety and security of Council Members, Candidates, and City personnel. C. Council Member: An individual currently serving in an elected capacity on the City Council of Palm Desert. D. Law Enforcement Authorities: This refers to any local, state, or federal agency responsible for enforcing laws and protecting public safety. This may include the local police department, sheriff’s office, or other agencies involved in investigating and responding to threats. E. Threat of Violence - Any verbal or written statement, including, but not limited to, texts, electronic messages, social media messages, or other online posts, or any behavioral or physical conduct, that conveys an intent, or that is reasonably perceived to convey an intent, to cause physical harm or to place someone in fear of physical harm, and that serves no legitimate purpose. F. Workplace Violence Prevention Plan (WVPP): A policy adopted by the City of Palm Desert designed to prevent and respond to incidents of violence in the workplace, ensuring the safety and well-being of employees. This plan is referenced in conjunction with this policy but excludes Candidates. 55 Administrative Procedures Manual CLRK-002 Citywide Records Management Policy Page 2 of 3 IV. POLICY A. Responsibilities of Council Members and Candidates: 1. Reporting Threats of Violence: Any Council Member or Candidate who perceives, experiences, or believes there is a threat to their safety must immediately report the threat to the City Manager and law enf orcement authorities. This includes threats made in person, through electronic communications, or via other means. 2. Basic Due Diligence: Council Members and Candidates are responsible for taking basic safety precautions in the event of a threat, such as: a. Notifying law enforcement immediately if the threat appears imminent. b. Avoiding public appearances or activities that may increase risk until guidance from law enforcement is received. c. Keeping a record of any threatening communications or actions, including written or digital communications, recordings, or eyewitness statements, to assist in any investigation. 3. Cooperation with Law Enforcement: Council Members and Candidates must fully cooperate with law enforcement in the investigation and assessment of any threats of violence. This includes providing all relevant details and following any recommended safety measures. 4. Confidentiality: Council Members and Candidates must also maintain the confidentiality of the investigation and avoid sharing details about t he threat with unauthorized individuals, unless advised otherwise by law enforcement. 5. Facility Access Control: a. Council Members are prohibited from inviting members of the public into City Hall after hours or on weekends without a special exception from the City Manager. This restriction is intended to reduce vulnerabilities during times when staff and law enforcement presence may be limited. b. Family members or guests of Council Members may be permitted to visit their offices or take brief tours of City Hall, but entry into employee-only areas is strictly prohibited unless authorized by the City Manager. Guests must remain under the direct supervision of the Council Member while on City premises . B. Training: The City shall provide regular training to relevant staff and officials on recognizing, reporting, and responding to threats of violence, specifically including those directed toward Council Members and Candidates. This training should include scenarios and best practices to ensure preparedness. This training is to be conducted in alignment with the City’s Workplace Violence Prevention Plan (WVPP) to ensure comprehensive safety measures across all departments, as mandated by SB 553. 56 Administrative Procedures Manual CLRK-002 Citywide Records Management Policy Page 3 of 3 C. Immediate Reporting: Any City employee, official, or individual who becomes aware of a threat of violence directed at a Council Member or Candidate must report the threat as soon as reasonably possible to the City Manager and local law enforcement authorities. The report should include all available details of the threat, including the nature of the threat, how it was received, and any identifying information about the person making the threat. D. Law Enforcement Involvement: The City Manager or designee will ensure that the threat is communicated to law enforcement and/or appropriate personnel for assessment and appropriate action. Law enforcement will determine the level of risk and take necessary steps to protect the Council Member or Candidate, which may include monitoring, investigation, or providing protective services. E. Confidentiality: The identity of the Council Member or Candidate and the details of the threat shall be kept confidential, shared only on a need-to-know basis with law enforcement and key City officials. F. Communication: The City Manager or designee, in consultation with law enforcement, will guide the Council Member or Candidate on appropriate steps to take, including any changes to their public schedule or activities. Any public communication about the threat will be handled by the City Manager or designee in coordination with law enforcement, ensuring that the information released does not compromise the investigation or the safety of the individual involved. G. Policy Updates and Amendments: This policy may be amended or updated as needed to reflect changes in the law, organizational structure, or operational needs. It shall be reviewed periodically to ensure alignment with the City’s WVPP and compliance with applicable state laws, including SB 553. All amendments shall be approved by the City Manager and communicated to relevant staff. H. Effective Date: This policy is effective immediately and shall remain in effect until amended or rescinded by the City Manager or City Council. 57 58 CITY OF PALM DESERT CITY MANAGER’S OFFICE INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM Date: September 12, 2024 To: Honorable Mayor and Councilmembers From: Anthony J. Mejia, City Clerk Subject: City Council Meeting of September 12, 2024 Below you will find questions received from the Mayor or Councilmembers and answers provided by City staff regarding tonight’s City Council meeting: ITEM 2d: STUDY SESSION: DRAFT POLICY CLRK-002: THREATS OF VIOLENCE DIRECTED TOWARDS COUNCIL MEMBERS AND CANDIDATES, AND CONSIDERATION OF FIREARMS RESTRICTIONS ON CITY PROPERTY Attached is an updated draft of Policy CLRK-002, which now includes a provision requiring that this policy be distributed to candidates and Council Members during orientation meetings. Additionally, an Incident Response Checklist has been developed to offer comprehensive guidance on responding to threats of violence directed toward these individuals. ITEM 13a: APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, AND HOUSING AUTHORITY MINUTES Please find attached an update to the City Council meeting minutes from August 22, 2024, for your review and approval (Redline on Pages 13 and 15 of the minutes). ITEM 14a: DIRECTION ON A RESOLUTION BEING CONSIDERED AT THE LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES’ GENERAL ASSEMBLY MEETING Q1: Are there any existing rules or regulations where state legislators currently face more stringent standards than local officials, such that pursuing equal treatment could result in additional restrictions being placed on local officials? A1: Yes, there are several areas where state legislators currently face more stringent regulations than local officials, which could result in additional restrictions being placed on local officials if equal treatment is pursued: 1. Legislative Transparency and Reporting: The California Legislature is subject to Article IV, Section 7 of the California Constitution, which mandates that the proceedings of the Legislature must be open and public, with limited exceptions. However, there are additional transparency and reporting requirements placed specifically on the Legislature through laws like the Legislative Open Records Act (LORA), which mandates public access to legislative records. While local officials are subject to the Public Records Act (PRA), LORA applies specifically to the Legislature, and certain records, such as those related to public employee salary data or budgeting, may have stricter public disclosure requirements for state officials. 59 09/12/2024 Question & Answer Memo Page 2 of 3 2. Campaign Contribution Reporting: Under California's Political Reform Act, state legislators face stricter reporting and disclosure requirements for campaign contributions, including higher penalties for violations compared to local officials. State candidates and officeholders are subject to more frequent and detailed reporting for contributions over certain thresholds, which must be disclosed within shorter timeframes than those required for many local officials. 3. Conflict of Interest Rules (Form 700): Both state and local officials are required to file financial disclosures (Form 700), but state legislators are subject to stricter scrut iny under Government Code Section 87100, which prohibits state lawmakers from making or participating in governmental decisions in which they have a financial interest. While local officials also file Form 700s, state officials may face additional investigation or higher penalties for non-compliance due to increased public scrutiny and enforcement mechanisms overseen by the Fair Political Practices Commission (FPPC). 4. Restrictions on Lobbying: State legislators are subject to lobbying disclosure laws under the Lobbyist Registration Act, which imposes stricter limitations and reporting requirements for gifts, donations, and contacts made by lobbyists. These rules are generally more detailed and restrictive than those applied to local officials, where lobbying activities are less regulated unless specifically adopted by a city or county ordinance. 5. Legislative Reform Act of 1990: This Act imposes term limits on members of the California Legislature. State Senators can serve a maximum of 12 years, whether in the Assembly or the Senate, while local officials in many cities and counties may not have the same term limit restrictions, unless a local law or charter specifies them. ITEM 14b: APPOINTMENTS TO AN AD HOC CITY COUNCIL SUBCOMMITTEE ON THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE Q1: How will the proposed subcommittee's work align with or differ from the work being done by the downtown zoning subcommittee? A1: The Ad Hoc Subcommittee on the Unified Development Code (UDC) is focused on reviewing and streamlining procedures while modernizing and ensuring consistency with regulations from multiple areas (such as zoning, landscaping, subdivisions, grading, and environmental issues) into a single cohesive document. While the downtown zoning subcommittee focuses more specifically on zoning-related issues within the downtown area, the UDC subcommittee will cover a broader range of regulations citywide, including zoning, but also other development-related policies and procedures. The two subcommittees may have some overlapping areas of interest, particularly when downtown-specific zoning regulations are integrated into the UDC, but their scope of work differs significantly. Q2: Considering that three Council members are currently up for re-election, would it be prudent to consider postponing this appointment until after the election? A2: Given the potential for disruption if members are not re-elected and the relatively short time until the election, it may be prudent to defer the appointment until after the election. This ensures stability in the subcommittee's composition and reduces the need for reappointments, allowing the subcommittee to work more effectively and continuously. Additionally, deferring these appointments will not delay the overall timeline of the project. 60 09/12/2024 Question & Answer Memo Page 3 of 3 ITEM 14c: CONSIDERATION OF A SPONSORSHIP REQUEST FOR THE TOUR DE PALM SPRINGS IN COACHELLA VALLEY Q1: Do we have specific cost estimates for law enforcement, traffic control plans, barricades, and road closures? Additionally, does the proposed $30,000 sponsorship fully cover or exceed these anticipated costs? A1: We do not currently have specific cost estimates for law enforcement, barricades, or road closures. To accurately assess these costs, a traffic control plan for the Palm Desert start needs to be developed. Once this plan is finalized, we will obtain quotes for its implementation and estimate the public safety services required. While it is anticipated that the $30,000 sponsorship will be sufficient to cover or closely match the projected costs, it's worth noting that Palm Springs incurred $113,000 for similar services at this year’s event, though their start and event area were significantly larger. 61 62 CITY OF PALM DESERT ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES Subject THREATS OF VIOLENCE DIRECTED TOWARD COUNCILMEMBERS AND CANDIDATES Policy No. CLRK-002 Date Approved: Amended: Approved by Resolution No. 2024-____ Authored by Anthony J. Mejia, City Clerk I. PURPOSE To establish a protocol for responding to threats of violence received by or directed toward Council Members and Candidates. II. SCOPE This policy applies to all City staff and officials who may become aware of threats of violence directed at Council Members or Candidates. This policy supplements the Workplace Violence Prevention Plan which would otherwise exclude candidates. III. DEFINITIONS A. Candidate: An individual who has filed the necessary paperwork and is actively campaigning for election to the Palm Desert City Council, in compliance with applicable election laws and regulations. B. Confidentiality: The obligation to keep all details related to threats, investigations, and protective measures private and to share such information only with authorized individuals as necessary for the safety and security of Council Members, Candidates, and City personnel. C. Council Member: An individual currently serving in an elected capacity on the City Council of Palm Desert. D. Law Enforcement Authorities: This refers to any local, state, or federal agency responsible for enforcing laws and protecting public safety. This may include the local police department, sheriff’s office, or other agencies involved in investigating and responding to threats. E. Threat of Violence - Any verbal or written statement, including, but not limited to, texts, electronic messages, social media messages, or other online posts, or any behavioral or physical conduct, that conveys an intent, or that is reasonably perceived to convey an intent, to cause physical harm or to place someone in fear of physical harm, and that serves no legitimate purpose. F. Workplace Violence Prevention Plan (WVPP): A policy adopted by the City of Palm Desert designed to prevent and respond to incidents of violence in the workplace, ensuring the safety and well-being of employees. This plan is referenced in conjunction with this policy but excludes Candidates. 63 Administrative Procedures Manual CLRK-002 Citywide Records Management Policy Page 2 of 5 IV. POLICY A. Responsibilities of Council Members and Candidates: 1. Reporting Threats of Violence: Any Council Member or Candidate who perceives, experiences, or believes there is a threat to their safety must immediately report the threat to the City Manager and law enf orcement authorities. This includes threats made in person, through electronic communications, or via other means. 2. Basic Due Diligence: Council Members and Candidates are responsible for taking basic safety precautions in the event of a threat, such as: a. Notifying law enforcement immediately if the threat appears imminent. b. Avoiding public appearances or activities that may increase risk until guidance from law enforcement is received. c. Keeping a record of any threatening communications or actions, including written or digital communications, recordings, or eyewitness statements, to assist in any investigation. 3. Cooperation with Law Enforcement: Council Members and Candidates must fully cooperate with law enforcement in the investigation and assessment of any threats of violence. This includes providing all relevant details and following any recommended safety measures. 4. Confidentiality: Council Members and Candidates must also maintain the confidentiality of the investigation and avoid sharing details about t he threat with unauthorized individuals, unless advised otherwise by law enforcement. 5. Facility Access Control: a. Council Members are prohibited from inviting members of the public into City Hall after hours or on weekends without a special exception from the City Manager. This restriction is intended to reduce vulnerabilities during times when staff and law enforcement presence may be limited. b. Family members or guests of Council Members may be permitted to visit their offices or take brief tours of City Hall, but entry into employee-only areas is strictly prohibited unless authorized by the City Manager. Guests must remain under the direct supervision of the Council Member while on City premises . B. Training: The City shall provide regular training to relevant staff and officials on recognizing, reporting, and responding to threats of violence, specifically including those directed toward Council Members and Candidates. This training should include scenarios and best practices to ensure preparedness. The policy will also be provided during candidate orientations and new Council Member orientations to ensure all individuals are familiar with the procedures and protocols. This training is to be conducted in alignment with the City’s Workplace Violence Prevention Plan (WVPP) to ensure comprehensive safety measures across all departments, as mandated by SB 553. 64 Administrative Procedures Manual CLRK-002 Citywide Records Management Policy Page 3 of 5 C. Immediate Reporting: Any City employee, official, or individual who becomes aware of a threat of violence directed at a Council Member or Candidate must report the threat as soon as reasonably possible to the City Manager and local law enforcement authorities. The report should include all available details of the threat, including the nature of the threat, how it was received, and any identifying information about the person making the threat. Refer to Exhibit A for a step-by-step checklist on the immediate reporting procedures and necessary actions following the receipt of a threat. D. Law Enforcement Involvement: The City Manager or designee will ensure that the threat is communicated to law enforcement and/or appropriate personnel for assessment and appropriate action. Law enforcement will determine the level of risk and take necessary steps to protect the Council Member or Candidate, which may include monitoring, investigation, or providing protective services. E. Confidentiality: The identity of the Council Member or Candidate and the details of the threat shall be kept confidential, shared only on a need-to-know basis with law enforcement and key City officials. F. Communication: The City Manager or designee, in consultation with law enforcement, will guide the Council Member or Candidate on appropriate steps to take, including any changes to their public schedule or activities. Any public communication about the threat will be handled by the City Manager or designee in coordination with law enforcement, ensuring that the information released does not compromise the investigation or the safety of the individual involved. G. Policy Updates and Amendments: This policy may be amended or updated as needed to reflect changes in the law, organizational structure, or operational needs. It shall be reviewed periodically to ensure alignment with the City’s WVPP and compliance with applicable state laws, including SB 553. All amendments shall be approved by the City Manager and communicated to relevant staff. H. Effective Date: This policy is effective immediately and shall remain in effect until amended or rescinded by the City Manager or City Council. 65 Administrative Procedures Manual CLRK-002 Citywide Records Management Policy Page 4 of 5 EXHIBIT A INCIDENT RESPONSE CHECKLIST: THREATS OF VIOLENCE Immediate Reporting (Reporting Party) ☐ Report any threat (verbal, written, electronic, etc.) to the City Manager and law enforcement authorities immediately. ☐ Include all available details in the report (e.g., nature of the threat, how it was received, and any information about the person making the threat). Responsibilities of Council Members and Candidates ☐ Take basic safety precautions (e.g., avoiding public appearances or high -risk activities until guidance is received from law enforcement). ☐ Document any threatening communications or actions to assist investigations. ☐ Do not share details of the threat with unauthorized individuals unless directed otherwise by law enforcement. Risk Assessment and Mitigation (City Manager’s Office) ☐ Ensure law enforcement is requested to conduct a risk assessment. ☐ Review security procedures and any vulnerabilities exposed by the incident. ☐ Conduct a security audit of facilities and adjust access controls, surveillance, or other measures as necessary. Guidance from City Manager and Law Enforcement ☐ The City Manager or designee, in consultation with law enforcement, will advise the Council Member or Candidate on any immediate steps to take, including changes to their public schedule or activities. ☐ Ensure that the Council Member or Candidate is advised on safe transportation options, including escorts if necessary. ☐ Determine whether the Council Member or Candidate should temporarily work remotely or limit exposure at public facilities such as City Hall. ☐ Advise on any necessary changes to communications, such as limiting public access to contact information or social media accounts. ☐ Establish a direct line of communication between the Council Member or Candidate and designated law enforcement personnel for real-time updates and support. Coordination with Legal and Communications Teams (City Manager’s Office) ☐ Coordinate with the legal team to ensure compliance with relevant laws and any potential legal ramifications. ☐ Review any necessary legal filings, restraining orders, or other legal actions that should be taken following the threat. ☐ Collaborate with the City’s Communications Team for a controlled public response, ensuring that messaging aligns with safety and confidentiality protocols. 66 Administrative Procedures Manual CLRK-002 Citywide Records Management Policy Page 5 of 5 Post-Incident Review and Documentation (City Manager’s Office) ☐ Conduct a debriefing with law enforcement, the City Manager, and relevant personnel to review the incident. ☐ Update the City's threat database or incident log with pertinent information to track recurring issues or patterns. ☐ Identify any areas for policy improvement or further training based on the incident. 67 68 CITY OF PALM DESERT STUDY SESSION: THREATS OF VIOLENCE AGAINST CITY COUNCIL AND CANDIDATES SEPTEMBER 12, 2024 69 PURPOSE Establish a protocol for responding to threats directed toward Council Members and Candidates. Ensure coordinated and immediate action to safeguard individuals. Supplements the City’s Workplace Violence Prevention Plan (WVPP), which excludes candidates. 70 ELEMENTS OF THE POLICY Scope Definitions Responsibilities of the Council Members and Candidates Reporting Threats of Violence Basic Due Diligence Cooperation with Law Enforcement Confidentiality Facility Access Control 71 ELEMENTS OF THE POLICY Training Regular Training for City Staff Candidate and New Council Member Orientation Immediate Reporting Law Enforcement Involvement Confidentiality Communication Policy Updates & Amendments 72 INCIDENT RESPONSE CHECKLIST Reporting Party Responsibilities Responsibilities of the Council Member and Candidate Risk Assessment and Mitigation (City Manager’s Office) Guidance from City Manager and Law Enforcement Coordination with Legal and Communication Teams Post-Incident Review and Documentation (City Manager’s Office) 73 CONCEALED WEAPONS CA Penal Code 171b prohibits individuals from bringing or possessing firearms or other specified weapons into state or local public buildings. PDMC 2.52 (Workplace Policies) prohibits City employees from possessing firearms or other weapons on City property. However, the provisions do not explicitly prohibit holders of Concealed Weapon Permits from carrying concealed firearms on City property. 74 CONCEALED WEAPONS QUESTION Should City staff and the City Attorney further research whether the City may enact an ordinance that would prohibit all firearms, including those carried by CWP holders, on City property, particularity at City Hall? 75 76 From:Brad Anderson To:CouncilMeeting Comments; CouncilMeeting Comments; CityClerk Subject:Public Comment - City of Palm Desert (study session) Item: 2.d Date:Thursday, September 12, 2024 2:54:16 AM September 12, 2024 City of Palm Desert City Council / City Hall 73510 Fred Waring Dr. Palm Desert, CA. 92260 Attention: Clerk of the Board/Council Members/City Manager/General Public Re: Written letter to be entered in the Public record and made available for public Inspection for the September 12, 2024, City of Palm Desert Council meeting - Agenda Item: 2.d (Discussion topic: proposed Firearms restrictions) Dear current City Council members, Please review my written statements listed below prior to the city council discussion of study session, agenda Item: 2.d (titled: Draft policy CLRK-002 Firearms restrictions). Please be aware, on many occasions the City of Palm Desert was notified of potential unlawful actions associated with the Citys current restriction to deny residents and guests the opportunity to provide verbal Public testimony (In person or remotely) on any topic listed on the Citys posted study session meeting agenda. It's also been observed that the city council study session meeting agendas has No listed "Non- Agenda" Item printed or considered to be constructed for the public to approach the City Council to voice concerns (petition the government). Please join California's long established Brown Act safeguards, and best practice protocols by allowing people to participate (if they desire) in the Public business at precived open Public meetings (Study Sessions) of the Palm Desert City Council. Please record this strong opposition to "Any" attempt to restrict/eliminate or suspend one's absolute right to legally process a firearm (If desired) within Palm Desert City boundaries. It's reasonable to consider that selected City Council members (and potentially city staff members) have inflation false narratives/claims of threats in a demented attempt to disarm Coachella Valley Resident's and foster unfounded fearmongering techniques among the population to potentially gain political favor. Furthermore, city resources (tax collected dollars) are being expelled through city staff time with constructing such a unconstitutional proposal with the scheduling and conducted "closed to public partispation" precived open Public meeting (Study session) of the very people (City Council) that have forwarded this potentially political maneuver for consideration. The subject of gun control measures are clearly outside the authority and duties of the Palm Desert City Council to perform. With the recent City Council vote to allow city voter's to decide on an increase in sale tax for this November 2024 election ballot - it's critical to remember that the current City Council has failed their residents and businesses by not living 77 within the Citys budget and expelling city resources without consideration for it's growing population. Sincerely, Brad Anderson | Rancho Mirage, CA. 92270 Cc; 78