HomeMy WebLinkAboutInformational Item Congestion Management Plan INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Richard J. Folkers, Assistant City Manager/Public Works Director
SUBJECT: INFORMATIONAL ITEM: CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PLAN
DATE: October 11 , 1990
Attached is a copy of the Congestion Management Plan for the Riverside
County Transportation Commission. The Public Works Director is one of the three
representatives of this committee For the eastern portion of Riverside County.
At this point in time, the only street that affects the City of Palm Desert
as far as being on the Congestion Management Network is Monterey Avenue with
various portions under the jurisdiction of the Cities of Palm Desert and Rancho
Mirage and the County of Riverside. The state routes of Highways 74 and 111 are
included, but they are under the jurisdiction of the State of California.
/(.9-LC-46)
RICHARD J. FOLKERS, P.E.
RJF/ms
Attachment
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
October 1, 1990
TO: RCTC Technical Advisory Committee
CMP Subcommittee
FROM: James W. Werle, Senior Staff Analyst
THROUGH: Paul Blackwelder, Deputy Executive Director
SUBJECT: Congestion Management Program (CMP) Draft Work Program and Schedule
The Congestion Management Work Program has been revised and detailed. It is comprised
of twelve primary tasks:
1. Initiate Development of CMP Work Program.
2. Designate System of Highways and Roadways.
3. Develop Transportation Modeling Program.
4. Establish Level of Service Criteria.
5. Develop Program to Analyze Land Use Impacts.
6. Develop Methodology for Deficiency Plans.
7. Establish Public Transit and Rail Standards.
8. Develop TDM/Air Quality Elements.
9. Develop Capital Improvement Program (TIP).
10. Develop CMP Compliance and Monitoring Process.
11. CMP Development and Implementation.
12. Submit Draft CMP/TIP to SCAG.
Staff Recommendation
Staff requests the TAC/CMP Subcommittee review and approve the CMP work program.
:jw
attachment
EXHIBIT B
CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
ORGANIZATIONAL CHART
RCTC
(Commission)
VP
W RCOG CVAG
Board Board
RCTC
TAC
Subcommittee comprised of:
TAC - 3 City Reps - Eastern Co.
CM P - 3 City Reps - Western Co.
Subcommittee - County of Riverside
- Caltrans Districts 08 & 11
- WRCOG
- CVAG
- SCAG/CVAG Modeling Staff
- Other City Reps in Attendance
SEPTEMBER 14, 1990
DRAFT WORK PROGRAM
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
PURPOSE:
This Work Program has been prepared to identify Tasks, the Project
Schedule (see Exhibit A) , and Costs associated with development of
a comprehensive Congestion Management Program (CMP) for Riverside
County required by AB 471 (Katz) and AB 1791 (amendments) . The
Work Program will be forwarded to the Riverside County
Transportation Commission (Commission) Technical Advisory Committee
(TAC) CMP Subcommittee, the TAC, and the Commission for review and
approval . Commission staff will be responsible for preparation of
the CMP in conjunction with its consultants, member agency staff,
Caltrans, Districts 08 and 11, other affected agencies, the Western
Riverside County Association of Governments (WRCOG) , and the
Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG) . An
organizational flowchart identifying responsible and affected
agencies is provided in Exhibit B. For purpose of this Work
Program, Commission staff and the consultant comprise the "Project
Team" .
BACKGROUND:
In 1989 , a comprehensive, six-bill Transportation and Passenger
Rail Bond Funding Package known as the Katz-Kopp-Baker-Campbell
Transportation Blueprint for the Twenty-First Century was passed by
the State Legislature. Following negotiations to increase the level
of financing for transportation improvements and revise the Gann
expenditure limit, the bills were signed by the Governor.
The new funding package, including the gas tax increase, was
approved by voters in California in June and provided for the State
Constitutional Amendment to raise the Gann Limit (SCA-1) .
The expenditure package will provide approximately $18 . 5 billion in
new transportation revenues over the next ten years. The package
included a phased increase of a total of nine cents per gallon in
the state diesel and gas tax over the next five years. Collection
of the first five cents of the gas tax increase (Phase 1) , began in
August, 1990.
A principal component of the funding package is AB 471, authored by
Assemblyman Richard Katz (D, Panorama City) , Chairman of the
Assembly Transportation Committee, and AB 1791 (amendments) . The
legislation established a number of new requirements governing the
1
The CMP Lead Agency must designate a system of highways
and roadways to include, at a minimum, all state highways
and principle arterials.
Traffic LOS Standards:
The methodology for measuring LOS must be that contained
in Circular 212 or the most recent version of the Highway
Capacity Manual unless the CMP agency approves the use of
another method determined to be consistent with the
Highway Capacity Manual; and
Minimum traffic standards must be set no lower than LOS
"E" for any segment or intersection on the CMP system,
unless the current LOS is lower (i.e. "F") .
Land Use Impact Analysis:
- The CMP must include a program to analyze the impact of
land use decisions by jurisdictions on the regional
transportation system, including an estimate of costs to
mitigate those impacts; and
- The CMP agency is to provide a uniform database on
traffic impacts "for use in a countywide transportation
computer model" . The CMP agency will approve the
computer models used within its jurisdiction -- modeling
methodology and data bases must be consistent with those
of the regional planning agency.
Deficiency Plans:
- AB 471 and AB 1791 provide for the development of
Deficiency Plans. The bills state that a city or county
may designate as deficient those individual segments or
intersections which do not meet the established level of
service standards, if prior to the designation at a
noticed public hearing, the city or county has adopted a
Deficiency Plan. The bills also identify the minimum
requirements for the content of Deficiency Plans.
Transit Service Standards:
- Must be established for service frequency (i.e.
headways) , routing, and coordination among multiple
transit agencies operating within the CMP jurisdiction.
Trip Reduction and Travel Demand Element:
3
PREPARATION OF THE DRAFT CMP
The tasks associated with preparation of the Draft CMP shall be
undertaken by the Project Team unless otherwise specified. Given
the expertise of various local, regional, and state agency staffs
within Riverside County, task responsibilities will be divided
among the Project Team and other agencies. All tasks and subtasks
shall be documented, technical policy issues shall be addressed, as
necessary, and the Draft CMP shall be prepared. Major policy
issues shall be reviewed by the TAC CMP Subcommittee, the WRCOG,
and CVAG, and then forwarded to the TAC and Commission for review
and approval .
TASK 1: DESIGNATION OF THE CMP LEAD AGENCY
AB 471 and AB 1791 direct each county to designate a CMP Lead
Agency to develop and monitor the CMP. The CMP Lead Agency can
either be the County Transportation Commission, or another public
agency, as designated by resolutions adopted by the county board of
supervisors and the city councils of a majority of the cities
representing a majority of the population in the incorporated areas
of the county. The county and the cities can, if they agree,
designate an existing public agency or form a new agency to develop
and monitor the CMP.
The Commission discussed alternatives for designating existing
agencies or creating a new agency to act as the CMP Lead Agency on
June 11, 1990 and forwarded letters requesting support of the
designation of the Commission to the County of Riverside and each
of the cities.
TASK 2 : DESIGNATION OF THE SYSTEM OF HIGHWAYS AND ROADWAYS
AB 471 and AB 1791 require development of a CMP to establish
traffic level of service (LOS) standards for a system of highways
and roadways designated by the CMP Lead Agency. This system shall
include, at a minimum, all state highways and principal arterials,
both new (to be implemented during the STIP cycle) , and existing
facilities. Once designated, no component of the system can be
removed.
To meet the requirements of this task, responsibility for research,
data compilation, and technical analysis will be assumed by the
Project Team. The resulting analysis shall be incorporated into
the Draft CMP.
Task 2 . 1: Develop criteria to select the System of Highways
5
development of the Future Year RIVSAN subregional
traffic model which also incorporates the CMP
System of Highways and Roadways designated in Task
2 .
Task 3 . 4 : SCAG/RCTC and CVAG will be responsible for
development of the Future Year CVATS subregional
traffic model which also incorporates the CMP
System of Highways and Roadways designated in Task
2 .
The following information shall be documented in Tasks 3 . 1 through
3 . 4 :
o Describe the models and database(s) currently used in
Riverside County for subregional travel demand
projections (RIVSAN and CVATS) . Describe how these
models incorporate growth and demographic projections;
o Describe other computer models that might be used by
local jurisdictions for specific subareas within the
County, and their relationship to the RIVSAN and CVATS
models, specifically, structure and application. Assess
what criteria would be used to determine subareas;
o Describe the model (s) used by SCAG (GMA 4 Mod J/H) to
project Riverside County growth and traffic, and to
establish the assumptions for transportation improvements
contained in the Regional Mobility Plan (RMP) ;
o Identify and evaluate how both the Riverside County
(RIVSAN and CVATS) and SCAG models project highway and
transit demand, and how mode split is determined, or is
to be determined; and
o Discuss the conflicts and discrepancies between the
Riverside County and SCAG input data, and identify the
policy issues which should be addressed such as trip
reduction, growth management (jobs/housing balance) , and
transportation improvement requirements. Evaluate the
RIVSAN and CVATS models and data base(s) for their
consistency with those used by SCAG.
Task 3. 5: The Project Team, working with SCAG modeling
staff, shall apply the suggested modeling process
to assess land use impacts associated with a recent
development proposal which includes a completed
traffic impact analysis. The results of this
analysis will assist staff in determining the
process through which development proposals should
be evaluated, and the threshold or level of
development which has the potential to impact the
7
implemented on a Countywide basis for the Base Year
which reflects existing and vested development.
Discuss how consistency with the established
standard is to be determined and monitored.
Task 4. 3: Assess how a LOS standard is to be established and
implemented on a Countywide basis for the Future
Year which reflects the Base Year and the Future
Year socioeconomic data bases developed by SCAG,
and the land use factors and socioeconomic data
bases developed for the subregional traffic models.
Discuss how consistency with the established
standard is to be determined and monitored.
Task 4 .4 : Consider alternatives for acquiring traffic count
data. Identify existing count locations and
additional locations along the CMP network where
counts will be necessary. Determine the level and
type of counts which will be necessary to develop
the LOS analysis.
Task 4.5: Discuss how transportation demand management (TDM)
measures designed to reduce vehicle trips and
vehicle miles traveled (VMT) could, in conjunction
with the use of transportation system management
(TSM) measures, affect LOS calculations.
TASK 5: LAND USK COORDINATION
AB 471 and AB 1791 require that the CMP include an element that
analyzes the impacts of land use decisions made by local
jurisdictions on the regional transportation system, and estimates
the costs associated with mitigating those impacts. This program
does, however, exclude local land use decisions pertaining to
proposed developments specified in development agreements entered
into prior to July 10, 1989.
Also excluded from the program are costs associated with mitigating
the impacts of interregional travel. Credit must be provided for
local public and private contributions to improvements on the
regional transportation system. For toll road facilities, however,
such credit can only be provided for contributions which are not
reimbursed from toll revenues or other state or federal funds. The
Commission, as the CMP Lead Agency, will be responsible for
calculating the amount of credit to be provided.
This task is one of the most significant elements of the CMP Work
Program since it focuses on a central objective of AB 471 and AB
9
- Based on the above review, evaluate the
feasibility of developing a standardized
Countywide program for determining land use
impacts and resulting mitigation requirements.
Discuss the cross-jurisdictional coordination
problems that would be involved in project
review, permit processing, and monitoring;
- With respect to monitoring land use and
growth, and determining land use impacts and
resulting mitigation requirements, discuss the
implications of excluding proposed
developments specified in development
agreements entered into prior to July 10,
1989 , and how that would be accomplished; and
- Evaluate the extent to which implementing AB
471 and AB 1791 may necessitate a centralized
land use and transportation planning process
within Riverside County.
Task 5.2 : Develop a program which estimates mitigation costs
and how they are to be implemented and coordinated
Countywide.
Prior to the development of Tasks 5 . 1 and 5. 2 , the Project Team
shall prepare a Policy Options Paper that discusses and presents
recommendations to the TAC CMP Subcommittee on the following
issues:
o What organizational mechanisms can or should be used to
coordinate or centralize the impact assessment and
mitigation requirements of AB 471 and AB 1791 between the
County and its 20 cities? What alternative roles could
be assumed by the Commission as the CMP Lead Agency?
What are the principal adjustments needed to local
planning, zoning and permitting functions, and how might
these be both minimized and accomplished? Can the
existing CEQA process be established to accomplish these
issues?
o Should an explicit process be established requiring each
transit operator to review impacts of land use decisions
on their system' s operating and capital needs?
o What is the potential for integrating the impact analysis
and mitigation requirements under this Task with the
process for meeting the LOS Standard under Task 4?
11
different from those used for LOS calculations
under Task 4 . Develop a process that the
Commission (CMP Lead Agency) could use to review
and approve Deficiency Plans; and
Discuss how Deficiency Plans developed by
individual jurisdictions can be coordinated on a
Countywide basis.
Task 6. 3 : Describe a generic range of improvements that a)
might be used to maintain the minimum required LOS
standard at locations of identified deficiencies
(segments or intersections) , and b) those which
would constitute improvements, programs, or actions
that would measurably improve LOS for the entire
designated system.
Task 6. 4 : Develop criteria which can be applied to determine
the impact of neighbor agency projects on other
agency Deficiency Plans.
Prior to the development of Tasks 6. 1 through 6. 4 , the Project Team
shall develop and prepare a Policy Options Paper that discusses and
presents recommendations on the following issues:
o Should the identification of deficiencies and the
development of Deficiency Plans be coordinated on a
Countywide basis? What are the options for establishing
such a process?
o If the process is not coordinated, how should the
Commission respond to cases of reluctance or inaction by
local jurisdictions which could jeopardize Countywide
compliance with CMP requirements?
o What criteria should be used in determining whether to
accept or reject a Deficiency Plan?
Further, assess the extent to which:
o Improvements to measurably improve air quality could be
the same as, or correspond to, those projects in the
Seven-Year CIP that are required to mitigate regional
impacts and conform to air quality mitigation measures.
(See Task 9) .
o Develop programs or actions designed to measurably
improve air quality which are the same as, or correspond
to, those programs or actions which are required of local
governments to implement select Control Measures and
other provisions of the regional Air Quality Management
Plan (AQMP) . (See the AQMP elements of Task 8 . )
13
Task 7.2 : Describe and summarize how the frequency and
routing of bus transit services in the County are
determined, and identify the principal operational
considerations and facility requirements (transit
centers, park-and-ride lots, etc. ) ; and
Develop a process for determining the impact of
transit and rail passenger improvements on the LOS
associated with Deficiency Plans, and on adopted
LOS standards.
Prior to development of Tasks 7 . 1 and 7 . 2 , the Project Team shall
develop and prepare a Policy Options Paper that discusses and
presents recommendations on the following issues:
o Are the operational standards currently used for
determining the frequency and routing of public transit
services within Riverside County adequate for purposes of
meeting AB 471 and AB 1791 requirements? If not, what
changes to these standards should be required?
o How should future countywide rail service, including both
state and private operations, be incorporated into the
CMP?
o How can the SRTPs and the Triennial Performance Audit
process be integrated into the CMP process?
TASK 8: TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT/AIR QUALITY
AB 471 and AB 1791 require that the CMP include a trip reduction
and travel demand element that promotes alternative transportation
methods such as carpools, vanpools, transit, bicycles, and related
park-and-ride lots; improvements in the balance between jobs and
housing; and development of strategies including flexible work
hours and parking management programs.
To meet the requirements of this task, responsibility for research,
data compilation, and technical analysis will be developed by the
Project Team and incorporated into the Draft CMP. Specific tasks
include the following:
Task 8. 1: Evaluate and compare the linkage or interface
between the adopted Air Quality Management Plan
(AQMP) and the CMP requirements under AB 471 and AB
1791. Consideration should be given to the
following AQMP components:
Transportation Demand Management (TDM) -
related Control Measures to be developed
15
o What options should be considered for establishing a TDM
program for purposes of AB 471 and AB 1791. Alternatives
include:
(1) Implementing SCAQMD' s Regulation XV Program as the
principal TDM component for the CMP and integrating
other local programs as appropriate; and
(2) Pursuing adoption of TDM model ordinances by local
governments Countywide, assuring compatibility with
Regulation XV, as required.
o What options should be considered for monitoring and
enforcement of the TDM program under each of the
respective alternatives identified above?
o How can TDM and TSM efforts be monitored to ensure the
mitigation of LOS deficiencies (see Task 6) and land use
impacts (see Task 5) ?
TASK 9 : CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (TIP PROCESS)
STAFF HOURS: 50 COST: $3,210
AB 471 and AB 1791 require the CMP to include a Seven-Year Capital
Improvement Program (CIP) to maintain or improve the traffic level
of service and transit performance standards developed in Task 7 .
Further, they require the CMP mitigate regional transportation
impacts defined in Task 5 in a manner that conforms to
transportation-related vehicle emission air quality mitigation
measures.
To meet the requirements of this task, the CIP requirements shall
be the same as, and accomplished through the RTIP/STIP development
process. The Project Team shall document the procedure in the
Draft CMP. Specific tasks include:
Task 9 . 1: Based on the process for evaluating transportation
improvement projects, develop a proposed Model
Seven-Year CIP, and coordinate the RTIP and CMP
processes; and
Evaluate the level of consistency between the model
Seven-Year CIP (TIP) and SCAG' s Transportation
Conformity Guidelines developed for the regional
Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) . Particular
attention should be given to SCAG' s definition of a
regionally significant project and its
environmental review requirements. Discuss any
problems that may arise regarding SCAG' s
responsibility to make a finding that projects in
17
projected programming for the next several TIP
cycles;
Compare programmed Riverside County projects
against available and projected revenues by source
and category, and estimated net contributions from
projected CMP subventions;
Identify and evaluate what County projects should
be included in the CMP Seven-Year CIP, and factors
involved in making such determinations, such as
local priorities and funding mix; and
Identify the parameters which SCAG would use to
determine that a CMP is consistent with the RMP,
and compatible with other CMPs in the region.
Prior to development of Task 10. 1, the Project Team shall develop
and prepare a Policy Options Paper that discusses and presents
recommendations to the TAC CMP Subcommittee on the following
issues:
o How should Countywide priorities for transportation
improvements be determined and who should make this
determination? Should the CMP identify such projects by
funding source and availability?
o How might conflicting priorities from Caltrans or the
CTC/STIP be resolved?
o How can the problem of a potential finding by SCAG of
inconsistency between the CMP and the RMP be avoided or
resolved, including the possibility that the CMP might be
found incompatible with other programs in the region?
Local Agency Conformance/Monitoring:
AB 471 and AB 1791 require the CMP Lead Agency (Commission) to
monitor implementation of all elements of the CMP, and annually
determine if the County and cities are conforming to the CMP
including LOS standards, trip and travel demand reduction, and land
use impact analyses. Nonconformance may result in the withholding
of local gas tax funds.
For purposes of conformance with LOS standards, the Commission as
the CMP Lead Agency, shall exclude those deficient
segments/intersections that are designated on an approved plan, as
well as impacts from such sources as: interregional travel;
facility construction, rehabilitation or maintenance; freeway ramp
metering; traffic signalization done by the state or multi-
jurisdictional agencies; and traffic generated by the provision of
low income housing.
19
CMP Lead Agency, be utilized to provide traffic data?
o What network of transportation facilities, including the
state system, transit and rail facilities should be
included in the CMP for purposes of monitoring the LOS E
standards?
o Identify how the problems that may exist in coordinating
the monitoring function between multiple jurisdictions
Countywide could be resolved.
o What constitutes nonconformity, and what process or
methods such as peer review or self-certification might
Commission as the CMP Lead Agency use to make a local
conformity finding?
o What steps should be followed if a jurisdiction invokes
local authority and refuses to conform with CMP
requirements?
o Are there options under AB 471 and AB 1791 for the Lead
Agency (Commission) to phase in CMP requirements?
TASK 11: CMP DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION
AB 471 and AB 1791 require that the CMP be developed, adopted and
annually updated. Locally, the program must be developed by the
Commission (CMP Lead Agency) in consultation and cooperation with
SCAG, Caltrans, WRCOG and CVAG, transit operators, Riverside County
and its cities, and the SCAQMD.
This task focuses largely on the procedural, administrative, and
coordination activities related to CMP development, adoption, and
the update process. It also raises numerous policy issues
regarding the linkage to local growth management. To meet the
requirements of this work effort, the Project Team shall process
the Draft CMP consistent with the following tasks:
Task 11. 1: Submit the Draft CMP to the TAC CMP Subcommittee
for review.
Task 11.2 : Upon review of the Draft CMP by the TAC CMP
Subcommittee, distribute the Draft CMP for 30 day
local, and regional review.
Task 11.3: The Project Team shall prepare the Final CMP
incorporating comments, as necessary.
Task 11. 4: Submit the Final Draft CMP to the TAC, WRCOG, and
CVAG for review and approval.
21
TASK 13: FINAL DRAFT CMP
Reports and Exhibits:
Task 13 . 1: The Project Team will prepare a Draft CMP by April,
30 , 1991 which combines all the components
specified in Tasks 1 through 11 into a single
volume. This product shall include any necessary
exhibits, charts, tables, and appendices.
Task 13 .2 : The Project Team will be required to verify and
defend that all information submitted as services
rendered is accurate and current. Furthermore, the
consultant will be required to document the
source (s) of all compiled information. All
information generated as part of the consultant ' s
or Commission staff ' s work shall become part of the
public record on the project.
Printing Requirements:
Task 13 . 3 : The Commission shall be responsible for printing
the Policy Papers, Technical Memorandums, and the
Draft and Final CMP.
Project Schedule:
Task 13 . 3 : Development of the Draft CMP shall be performed in
accordance with the CMP Work Program Schedule (see
Exhibit A) .
TASK 14 : PROJECT MANAGEMENT
The Primary Consultant shall work with, and under the direction of,
the Commission Project Manager and assigned staff and the
Commission TAC CMP Subcommittee toward preparation of the CMP. The
Program shall be prepared considering technical papers and
alternative policy recommendations to be submitted for review and
approval by the TAC, the COG' s and the Commission.
Management functions will be performed jointly by the TAC CMP
Subcommittee and the Project Team. The TAC CMP Subcommittee will
provide direction in the development of technical components. The
COG' s and Commission will provide direction in matters involving
final policy decisions and relations with other governmental
functions. The Project Team will prepare recommendations for
presentation the TAC CMP Subcommittee and will
be responsible for carrying the work forward to the COG' s and
Commission.
23
CMP SCHEDULE
1990 1991 1992
JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN
PREPARE CMP WORK PROGRAM •••••••••• ••••••••
TASK I Initiate Development of CMP Work Program
1.1 Establish TAC CMP Sub-Committee •
1.2 Develop Tasks/Schedule of Work Activity •••••
1.3 Identify Resonsible Agencies •••••
1.4 Develop Person Year Costa •••
1.5 Document CMP Work Program •••
1.6 Submit Work Program to TAC CMP Sub-Committee •
1.7 Submit Work Program to TAC •
1.8 Submit Work Program to RCTC(Commission) •
PREPARE DRAFT CMP •.••...•..••••••....••••••••••
TASK 2 Designate System of Highways and Roadways
2.1 Define Criteria for Selecting Network •••••
2.2 Select Principal Arterials for Network •••••
2.3 Forward to TAC CMP Sub-Committee for Review •
2.4 Forward to TAC,WRCOG,do CVAG for Review ••••• ••
•
TASK 3 Develop Transportation Modeling Program
3.1 SCAG(DKS)Validate 1987 Base Year RIVSAN ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
Model, Add CMP Network
3.2 SCAG/CVAG Validate 1987 Base Year CVATS Model ••••••••••••••• ••••••••••••••••..•••••••.......t..•*•••
3.3 SCAG(DKS)Develop Future Year Model •••••
3.4 SCAG/CVAG Develop Future Year Model *We
3.5 Apply Models to Assess Land Use Impacts •.....••.•
3.6 Establish Procedures for Funding/Administration ♦...••••••
CMP SCHEDULE
1990 1991 1992
JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN
TASK 9 Develop Capital Improvement Program (TIP)
9.1 Coordinate RTIP and CMP Process •••••••••••••••
TASK 10 Develop CMP Compliance and Monitoring Process
10.1 Develop Process For Consistency •••••
Between the CMP and RTP
2 Develop Process for Local Agency Conformance ••••••••••
with CMP
10.3 Develop process to handle exceptions to LOS standards •••••••••••••••
and impacts from adjacent jurisdictions
LOCAL REVIEW
TASK 1 I CMP development and Implementation •••••••••••••••••••••••
11.1 TAC CMP Sub-Committee Review •
11.2 30 Day Local and Regional Agency Review ••• •••
11.3 Revise Draft CMP Considering 11.1 and 11.2 •••
11.4 Submit Final Draft to TAC, Western COG, •
and CVAG for Review
11.5 Submit Draft CMP to Commission and SCAG for Review •
11.6 Develop TIP Priorities Incorporating CMP Projects •••••
' Submit Final TIP&CMP to Commission for Approval and •
make Air Quality Conformance Finding
REGIONAL(SCAG)REVIEW
TASK 12 Submit Draft CMP/TIP to SCAG •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
11.1 SCAG Executive Committee Adopts RTIP •
11.2 RTIP Submitted to CTC •
11.3 CTC Adopts STIP Aprll 1, 1992