HomeMy WebLinkAboutCoachella Valley Mountains Conservancy Land Acquisition CTY COHJNCIL ACTION:
APPROVED DENIE]
RECEIVED OTHERS B0OnS1
MEETIMG DATE On&A-461 COC� iTIA
d-^n � �51 0L0 1`
AYES: LNI A t p \V �ji J� u�'��511�, c'rv� 1 \
NOES: �Mo U MEMORANDUM
ABSENT: v rJciY� _
ABSTAIN: CITY OF—PALM DESERT
VERIFIED BY: 1311 za- L40
Original on File with City Clerk' s Office
o: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
City Manager Bruce Altman
From: Buford A. Crites
Councilman
Date: January 9, 1993
Re: COACHELLA VALLEY MOUNTAINS CONSERVANCY LAND ACQUISITION
Attached is a letter from the staff of the Coachella Valley
Mountains Conservancy noting a possible opportunity for the
Conservancy to acquire lands via the Riverside County Assessor' s
Office for property available through non-payment of taxes.
These lands would be acquired from the Conservancy by the Federal
Bureau of Land Management, which would net the Conservancy a
monetary profit which would be used for staffing and operational
purposes.
Acquisition from the Conservancy by the BLM may take up to one
year, and the Conservancy is requesting a loan of approximately
$65, 000. 00 for a period of one year from the City of Palm Desert
to facilitate the acquisition and transfer of these lands. The
Conservancy is willing to pay what interest the City would
receive on the funds from present investment of said dollars. I
believe that it would be a good investment to assist the
Conservancy in accomplishing their mandate of acquiring mountain
land.
The action requested is for the Mayor to sign, if appropriate,
documents as necessary to accomplish the acquisition. For your
information, I have also attached a copy of "Milestones In The
Mountains Conservation Effort" .
BAC:phs
attachments: as noted
BUFORD,A. CRITES
COUNC LMAN
COACHELLA VALLEY MOUNTAINS CONSERVANCY
In partnership to protect our mountain heritage
Governing Board February 4, 1993
City of Cathedral City
City of Coachella
City of Desert Hot Springs
City of Indian wells TO: Buford
City of Indio FROM: Bill
City of La Quinta
City of Palm Desert
City of Palm Springs Could you sign the enclosed and send them out in the mail?
City of Rancho Mirage
Governor's Appointee I've also enclosed a copy of the Shadowrock letter for your files.
State Senate Appointee
State Assembly Appointee
Riverside CountySupervisor On the tax defaulted parcels,in case I don't get a chance to discuss this on the phone
Districtiii with you,there wasn't sufficient authorization given from the Conservancy yesterday
Riverside CountySupervisor for me to send the necessary resolution to the Tax Collector,and I didn't want to press
District IV
Agua Caliente Band the issue given the lack of quorum and the debate over whether it was an emergency
of Caituilla Indians item,etc. The back up plan is to have either the Regional Park and Open Space District
Statepartment of
Parks d Recreation or the Riverside Land Conservancy act on the Conservancy's behalf and include the
Bureau of Land Management parcels in their requests to have parcels removed from the public auction sale. The real
U.S.Forest Service key is whether we can come up with the money to buy the parcels. BLM will buy two
Wildlife ConserDepartment
ation Board of the parcels back from us,but they have to wait a year before title is considered clear
State Department of
Fish and Game on a tax default purchase like this, so what we're looking at is a one year loan from
someone of about$66,000. The prime candidate is MRC as Rick Daniels has
previously indicated an interest in doing something significant for the Conservancy. I
am sending him a letter asking whether MRC might make us the loan. If they will,we •
could pay it back after BLM buys the parcels from us,and the Conservancy would still
stand to make some money since BLM would pay fair market value based on an
appraisal,whereas we would only pay 50% of what the Tax Collector assumes the cash
PPS
value of the property to be. Ergo,we should at least double our money. The worst case ,
scenario is that the parcels get redeemed before we can buy them; then we would incur
about$400-$500 in incidental costs which we couldn't recover. I'm enclosing
information on the parcels in question and the resolution which we did not adopt
• yesterday just as background material. Let me know if you have any problems with my
pursuing this.
P.O. Box 2855 • Palm Desert, CA 92261-2855 • 619-776-5026
I
RESOLUTION 93-03 OF THE GOVERNING BOARD
OF THE COACHELLA VALLEY MOUNTAINS CONSERVANCY
ADOPTED IN REGULAR SESSION
FEBRUARY 3, 1993
WHEREAS,the Coachella Valley Mountains Conservancy was established by the State of
California on September 17, 1990, to acquire and hold in open space, mountainous lands
surrounding the Coachella Valley,for the protection of natural and cultural resources and
the public's enjoyment thereof;and
WHEREAS,these mountainous lands,including the San Jacinto, Santa Rosa,and Little
San Bernardino Mountains,provide critical habitat for diverse wildlife species,including
the peninsular bighorn sheep and numerous other sensitive,rare,threatened,and
endangered species;and
WHEREAS, Assessor's Parcel Numbers 669270002-4, 686110012-3, and
745330016-9 are located within the Conservancy's boundaries[see attached map],and
their purchase for any purpose other than resource conservation could result in adverse
impacts to their wildlife,scenic,and cultural resource values;
NOW,THEREFORE,be it resolved in regular session of the Governing Board of the
Coachella Valley Mountains Conservancy that the Conservancy objects to the public sale of
the parcels identified above and further described in Exhibit A,hereby incorporated by
reference;and,
FURTHER,the Conservancy hereby offers to purchase said properties through a
Chapter 8 Agreement of Sale at the prices shown in Exhibit A,or at any lower cost which
might subsequently be determined by the Treasurer-Tax Collector;and
FURTHER,the Conservancy hereby agrees to pay the cost of giving notice,and
recognizes that this cost is not included in the purchase price identified in Exhibit A;and
FURTHER,the Conservancy's purpose in acquiring the land would be to hold it in open
space for the protection of its environmental,anthropological,cultural,scientific,
educational,recreational,scenic,and wildlife resources in accordance with Division 23.5
(commencing with Section 33500) of the Public Resources Code.