Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Res 99-92 GPA 99-3 CZ 99-2 PP-CUP 99-7 DA 99-3 Pearl Industriec 10-14-1999
Resolution No. 99-92 CITY OF PALM DESERT DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT TO: Mayor and City Council II. REQUEST: Consideration of an appeal to a decision of the Planning Commission denying a request by Pearl Industries, Inc., for approval of a general plan amendment to add senior overlay, approval of a change of zone from PR-7 (planned residential 7 units per acre) to PR-7 S.O. (planned residential senior overlay), precise plan of design/conditional use permit (including a height exception for the three (3) story portion, development agreement and a negative declaration of environmental impact as it relates to a proposed 250 unit continuing care retirement community, a community center building and a 99 bed skilled nursing facility on 1 3.04 acres on the west side of Fairhaven Drive between Fred Waring Drive and Parkview Drive, 72-650 Fred Waring Drive and 72-755 Parkview Drive. III. APPLICANT/APPELLANT: Pearl Industries Inc. Pearl Industries Inc. 66 Alviso Drive c/o Charles Sweet Camarillo, CA 93010 43-708 Virginia Avenue Palm Desert, CA 9221 1 IV. CASE NOS: GPA 99-3, C/Z 99-2, PP/CUP 99-7 and DA 99-3 V. DATE: October 14, 1999 VI. CONTENTS: A. Staff Recommendation B. Discussion C. Draft Resolution No. 99-92 D. Planning Commission Minutes involving this case E. Planning Commission Resolution No. 1943 F. Planning Commission Staff Report dated September 21 , 1 999 G. Related maps and/or exhibits --AIEETTN AYE A. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: ItikOnTINUED TO 1\ -T.I m.F. U IJC ,e_.irA-i Waive further reading and: PASSED T02NDREADING 1 . Adopt findings; E��Q-�� f3 4 C� -rO R• Lfko.S►.Zi 1.)C9 C(5mryvISS lop.) Fe�. LuT i o ©F (Nu— CO 1 c e S Resolution No. 99-92 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CASE NOS. GPA 99-3, C/Z 99-2, PP/CUP 99-7 AND DA 99-3 OCTOBER 14, 1999 2. Adopt Resolution No. 99-92 denying GPA 99-3, C/Z 99-2, PP/CUP 99-7 and DA 99-3. B. DISCUSSION: 1 . BACKGROUND: a. SITE DESCRIPTION: The property is an irregularly shaped site comprising 13.04 acres generally located on the west side of Fairhaven between Fred Waring Drive and Parkview Drive. The property is generally flat with a slight slope to the southeast and is lightly scattered with native vegetation. The site has never been improved. b. ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE: North: Rancho Mirage/single family residential South: PC(3)/Trader Joe's center East: R-1 and PR-7/single family residential and apartments West: PR-22 AHD/One Quail Place c. SITE ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: The site is currently zoned PR-7 and is designated medium density residential 5-7 units per acre. 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project includes a 99 bed skilled nursing facility and a 250 unit continuing care retirement community which provides individual living and assisted living. The skilled nursing facility is a single story, 18 foot high structure which is located adjacent to Fred Waring Drive. This facility has access from Fred Waring Drive and connects to the rest of the project to the north through an on-site driveway system. The continuing care retirement community building(s) is a three (3) story building 28 feet in height above adjacent curb. The south wing faces toward Fairhaven Drive and the north wing faces toward Parkview Drive. These two 2 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CASE NOS. GPA 99-3, C/Z 99-2, PP/CUP 99-7 AND DA 99-3 OCTOBER 14, 1999 buildings connect at the community center building (42 feet in height above curb line). All of the continuing care structure is at least two stories and 17 feet above curb in height. The three story portion (28 feet in height above curb) has been pushed back from Fairhaven and Parkview and is adjacent to the two story (22 feet in height) One Quail Place. The third story is setback from Fairhaven Drive 120 feet and is setback 1 1 7'/2 feet from Parkview Drive. The main access to the continuing care buildings is from Parkview Drive at the east limit of the property. This access leads to surface parking, to underground parking and a valet drop off area at the community building. At the west end of the site on Parkview and at the north end of Fairhaven Drive gated, emergency vehicle only, access points will be provided. The continuing care portion of the project includes: UNIT TYPE CODE SIZE REQUIREMENT SIZE PROVIDED 154 - 1 bedroom units 500 square feet 826 sq ft and 910 sq ft 90 - 2 bedroom units 700 square feet 1 183 sq ft & 1 220 sq ft 6 - 3 bedroom units N/A 1 640 sq ft 250 Total Units with 98 in the south building and 1 52 units in the north building While the project will provide a common dining room, all units will have their own kitchen. As well, each unit has a full bath and living area. PROJECT DATA a. SKILLED NURSING FACILITY Project Code Standard Setbacks: Front (Fred Waring) 94 feet 32 feet Sides (E/W) 60 feet/20 feet 20 feet Rear 20 feet 20 feet 3 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CASE NOS. GPA 99-3, C/Z 99-2, PP/CUP 99-7 AND DA 99-3 OCTOBER 14, 1999 b. CONTINUING CARE BUILDING Project Code Standard Setbacks: Front (Fairhaven Drive) 60' to 17' section 20' to 18' section 120' to 28' section 120' for 24' section (Parkview Drive 42' to 17' section 32' to 18' section 1 10' to 28' section 120' to 24' section Side (W) 48' 20' Rear 35' 20' Maximum Height Flat Roof 28 feet** (above curb) 22 feet Maximum Coverage 34% 50% Parking* 484: 318 underground 300*** 166 above ground Senior Overlay Intensity**** 561 persons 652 persons * Senior Overlay projects serving persons age 62 and older are required to provide a minimum of one parking space per unit. ** The PR zone and the Senior Overlay district limit maximum height to two (2) stories and 22 feet for flat roofed structures. The building section for the three stories is 33 feet; however, the applicant proposes to lower the building five feet into the ground creating a net height of 28 feet above the adjacent curb. The applicant is seeking an "exception" to the height and number of stories. *** Based on one for each residential unit and one for each two beds in a skilled nursing facility. **** The Senior Overlay zone density is a function of the projected population of the project. Projects in excess of ten acres are permitted a maximum of 50 persons per acre with a minimum age of 62 years (13.04 acres x 50 PPA = 652 persons). This project contains a (99 bed skilled nursing facility 99 persons) + (154 one bedroom units x 1 .75 PPA = 270 persons) + (96 two and three bedroom units x 2.0 PPA = 192 persons) (99 + 270 + 192 = 561 persons). 3. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT, CHANGE OF ZONE AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT: The project will require a general plan land use amendment to add senior housing, change of zone adding the senior overlay and a development agreement. The senior housing designation was designed to provide increased 4 (.1 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CASE NOS. GPA 99-3, C/Z 99-2, PP/CUP 99-7 AND DA 99-3 OCTOBER 14, 1999 density and special development standards to encourage the development of various forms of senior housing. When the senior overlay was created, it was anticipated that senior projects would be requesting densities in excess of 20 units per acre. Due to the significantly lower traffic and other impacts of senior housing, the overlay allows these densities based on a population per acre land use intensity formula. The overlay also requires that senior housing projects include up to 25% affordable housing in exchange for these large density bonuses. For example Hacienda de Monterey, the first project approved under the overlay, received a density increase from R-1 10,000 (three units per acre) to 23 units per acre. Total allowable units increased from 31 to 233. This project if approved would increase the permitted number of units from 91 to 300 units. For projects in excess of 100 units the affordable housing inclusionary requirement mandates 10% moderate income units, 10% low income units and 5% very low income units. Several previous projects were high-end congregate care and assisted living projects providing a wide range of services (meals, recreation, maid service, medical care, etc.) beyond basic housing and it was difficult to determine an appropriate affordable housing cost. As a result, the City and developer of these projects have historically agreed through a development agreement to substitute an in-lieu fee which would be used by the City to subsidize senior housing. In the case of Portofino (Royce International Investments Co., approved in 1999) a $12,000 per required affordable unit was assessed. In this instance the applicant will be allowed to meet the affordability requirement either through a one time payment of $12,000 per affordable unit (i.e., 75 units) or by restricting 30 units for occupancy by moderate income households, 30 units by lower income households and 15 units by very low income households. Staff will further refine these provisions and prepare a draft development agreement if the project gets a go ahead on other issues. 4. STAFF CONCERNS: From the time we received this application staff has had concerns with various aspects of this project. 5 r'-. 'CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CASE NOS. GPA 99-3, C/Z 99-2, PP/CUP 99-7 AND DA 99-3 OCTOBER 14, 1999 a. ACCESS: The project initially had its main access from Fairhaven Drive. This was unacceptable given the recent history of traffic in the Palmdale Estates area. The applicant consequently revised the plan to provide access from Fred Waring Drive and Parkview Drive only. b. BUILDING HEIGHT, NUMBER OF STORIES AND MASS: The PR zone and the senior overlay limit height to two stories and 22 feet for flat roofed structures. The plan originally proposed three stories and 33 feet in height. In an effort to reduce the height impact, the applicant proposed to depress the structure five feet into the ground. The first floor would be five feet below curb height reducing the apparent building height to 28 feet. The applicant eliminated several of the third story units to help break up the roof line and lower the appearance and eliminated the third floor units closest to Fairhaven Drive and Parkview Drive (the project originally had 280 units in the residential portion versus 250 currently proposed). The basic design concept provides a linear building with wing sections extending closest to the streets. This too helps to lower its appearance. The project includes a series of tower elements which are included to help break up the roof line. These architectural projections are 37 feet in height except for the community center building which is 42 feet in height. Municipal Code Section 25.68.300 "B" permits tower elements which do not exceed 10% of the ground area covered by the structure to be erected not more than 25 feet above the height permitted in the base zone (i.e., 22 feet + 25 feet = 47 feet maximum tower height because the towers comprise less than 10% of the covered area). Notwithstanding all the mitigation that the applicant has designed into the project, staff cannot support an "exception" to the height of the building. The City has recently processed height exceptions in the PR zone for the Marriott timeshare at Monterey and Frank Sinatra and for The Courtyard hotel at Frank Sinatra and Cook Street. In both these instances we have many hundreds of feet of separation between 6 • CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CASE NOS. GPA 99-3, C/Z 99-2, PP/CUP 99-7 AND DA 99-3 OCTOBER 14, 1999 existing residences and the proposed buildings. In fact, both projects were located on or adjacent to a golf course. The extensive separation became the finding to support the "exception." The exceptional separation also resulted in neighbors eventually supporting the timeshare project. In this case we do not have hundreds of feet of separation, the site is an infill situation in a developed neighborhood and the neighbors are strongly opposed (see next section of this report and letters attached). On two sides we have single story dwellings and on one side we have One Quail Place which is two story and 22 feet in height. The three story portion while it has been pushed away from the streets is located adjacent to One Quail Place and will be six feet taller. The building mass is further emphasized by its overall length (over 1350 feet in total length) when measured from south end to west end. This proposed 28-foot high structure does not warrant a height "exception." If the city is not prepared to grant the height exception, the remainder of the request becomes moot in that the applicant has advised staff that eliminating all of the third story units would make the project infeasible. If the commission feels that the three story project has merit but does not warrant an "exception" commission should direct staff to prepare an ordinance amendment to permit an increased maximum height limit in the PR zone. Such an amendment would apply citywide. c. LANDSCAPING AND ARCHITECTURE: Staff is concerned that on the east side of the project adjacent to Fairhaven the landscape depth is inadequate to effectively screen the project. The grading plan provides 17 feet from the curb face on Fairhaven to the curb in the parking lot. In this 17 feet there will be an 8-foot sidewalk which only leaves 9 feet to plant. Along Parkview we have 47 feet less the 8-foot sidewalk. Considering that the project is over parked by about 180 spaces, it should be possible to eliminate the 29 parking spaces adjacent to Fairhaven Drive and create a significant landscape buffer. 7 1 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CASE NOS. GPA 99-3, C/Z 99-2, PP/CUP 99-7 AND DA 99-3 OCTOBER 14, 1999 August 24, 1999, the applicant obtained a "conceptual approval" of the building architecture from the ARC with direction to improve it. The applicant revised the plans and it was returned to ARC at its September 14, 1999 meeting. At that time ARC once again was not prepared to grant preliminary approval. ARC felt that while the applicant had taken many steps to mitigate the building height, the architecture was not yet acceptable (see minutes and resolution attached). ARC ultimately concluded that the plans could be made acceptable but before the applicant spends additional funds addressing these architectural concerns the building height issue needs to be resolved. 5. PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY: The commission voted 4-1 to deny the request. The commission indicated that the project needed to be scaled down and to hold to the 22 foot height limit. Other commissioners expressed concern with the proposed 28 foot height, the density and the building mass. Chairperson Jonathan, who voted nay on the resolution of denial, commented that this proposal was "too much", that the third story setback needed to be increased which would decrease the unit count and consequently reduce the density. He also suggested that towers be eliminated and that landscaping be added at the second story level. It should be noted that the commission offered a "continuance" to the applicant. Mr. Sweet declined the "continuance" offer and indicated that if the commission was not prepared to grant approval that he preferred a denial which he could then appeal to the city council. Commission heard testimony from seven people supporting the application. Reasons for supporting the project ranged from the project is needed to serve the community, is well designed, will have ample open space and will provide a significant amount of underground parking. Commission heard testimony from seven persons opposing the project. For the most part the reasons for opposing were as setforth in written correspondence to commission. This included building height, density, building mass, traffic and incompatibility with the adjacent single family neighborhood. One gentleman questioned the appropriateness of putting two very large high density projects adjacent to each other in the same neighborhood. 8 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CASE NOS. GPA 99-3, C/Z 99-2, PP/CUP 99-7 AND DA 99-3 OCTOBER 14, 1999 6. COMMUNITY MEETINGS: In an effort to advise the neighbors of this project the applicant held a community meeting on April 24, 1999. Following the community meeting the city received 31 letters of objection. Areas of concern of the residents can be summarized as follows: a. Excessive Density (14) b. Excessive Traffic (21 ) c. Building Mass (3 story) (16) d. View Blockage (20) e. Incompatible with Neighborhood (14) f. Decrease Property Values (13) g. Noise (7) h. Inconvenience during construction (1 ) Noise of emergency vehicles (1 ) Project unneeded-others available (2) k. Access from Fairhaven Drive (5) As a result of this public input a traffic impact analysis was prepared and the project access was altered. The revised project moved the main access from Fairhaven Drive to Parkview Drive. The access to Fairhaven will be for only emergency vehicles. The traffic report concludes that the project would have "a minimum impact at the studied intersections during the peak hours." Placing the main access on Parkview Drive would add 12 vehicles per hour in the PM peak who would use Parkview to access the site. This amounts to one vehicle every five minutes. In this same PM peak hour ten vehicles are expected to exit the site or one every six minutes. The report concludes that traffic flow on Parkview will remain acceptable. Staff feels that the matter of noise, emergency vehicles and the inconvenience during construction could be addressed through appropriate conditions and existing city ordinances. These will be provided if the project can overcome other concerns. 9 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CASE NOS. GPA 99-3, C/Z 99-2, PP/CUP 99-7 AND DA 99-3 OCTOBER 14, 1999 The other concerns of area residents can be grouped as follows: a. Density of 23 units per acre is incompatible with adjacent single family residential dwellings. b. The building height (28 feet above curb) and mass is incompatible with the neighborhood, will impair views and decrease property values. With respect to the density/intensity of development staff feels that a differently designed project could be acceptable (One Quail Place is 22 units per acre). In the matter of item B staff concurs that a height "exception" to permit 28 feet is not warranted. 7. CONCLUSION: The applicant is proposing a high quality residential ownership project which is a combination of independent living, assisted living and skilled nursing. The project includes 318 underground parking spaces plus surface spaces and provides 184 more spaces than code requires. The units range in size from 824 square feet to 1655 square feet. Even with these pluses the project has one fatal flaw - the building height at 28 feet exceeds the code limit. Staff scheduled this matter before the applicant had obtained the customary "preliminary" approval from ARC. We did this because even if he eventually comes up with an acceptable 28 foot high architectural plan, staff could not support an "exception" to the height limit. At the same time the applicant wanted the opportunity to argue the merits of the project before Planning Commission and City Council. The applicant also requested that we not continue the matter at Planning Commission as this would delay the matter from getting before the City Council. If the City Council feels that this is a desirable project which should be approved, staff requests that the City Council continue the matter to a date certain and refer the matter back to staff for preparation of environmental documentation, resolutions of approval, development agreement and processing of a zoning ordinance amendment to increase the permitted building 10 l0 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CASE NOS. GPA 99-3, C/Z 99-2, PP/CUP 99-7 AND DA 99-3 OCTOBER 14, 1999 height in the Senior Overlay. Such increased building height would apply to all senior projects. 8. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Staff and the Planning Commission have recommended that the project not be approved. If that recommendation is upheld there will be no project and hence no environmental review is necessary. If the City Council directs staff to prepare resolutions of approval, staff will complete all necessary environmental documentation. Prepared by: Steve Smith Reviewed and Approved by: N/ Philip Drell /tm 11 If RESOLUTION NO. 99-92 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, DENYING AN APPEAL BY CHARLIE SWEET ON BEHALF OF PEARL INDUSTRIES INC. TO A DECISION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION DENYING A REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT TO ADD SENIOR OVERLAY, CHANGE OF ZONE FROM PR-7 S.O. (PLANNED RESIDENTIAL SENIOR OVERLAY), PRECISE PLAN OF DESIGN/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (INCLUDING A HEIGHT EXCEPTION FOR THE THREE (3) STORY PORTION), A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AND A NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT AS IT RELATES TO A PROPOSED 250 UNIT CONTINUING CARE RETIREMENT COMMUNITY, A COMMUNITY CENTER BUILDING AND A 99 BED SKILLED NURSING FACILITY ON 13.04 ACRES ON THE WEST SIDE OF FAIRHAVEN DRIVE BETWEEN FRED WARING DRIVE AND PARKVIEW DRIVE, 72-650 FRED WARING DRIVE AND 72-755 PARKVIEW DRIVE. CASE NOS. GPA 99-3, C/Z 99-2, PP/CUP 99-7 AND DA 99-3 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 14th day of October, 1999, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider an appeal by PEARL INDUSTRIES INC. to a decision of the Planning Commission denying the above noted cases; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 21st day of September, 1991 , adopt its Resolution No. 1943 denying the above noted cases; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said City Council did find the following facts and reasons to exist to justify denial of said request: 1 . The proposed building height exceeds that permitted in the PR zone district and the senior overlay district. 2. The building height and mass would not be compatible with the neighborhood into which the project is proposed to be located. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1 . That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the council in this case. 2. That GPA 99-3, C/Z 99-2, PP/CUP 99-7 and DA 99-3 are hereby denied. RESOLUTION NO. 99-92 PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert City Council held on this day of , 1999, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ROBERT A. SPIEGEL, Mayor ATTEST: SHEILA R. GILLIGAN, City Clerk City of Palm Desert, California 2 I � III....... f ' 3/91 ----� f( ' \‘ .\ CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNM co s ,it 1 co • rn c� � Z7 b'� . =='' id:: APPLICATION TO APPEAL m N rn � � - fi0��r N n rn 1 .' l`'"'' /t/ / f ,CT� 0 DECISION OF THE /Ur (Name of Co�rinittee/onunission -° c, Case No.6194 _, Z2-2. Meeting Date: 9 7/ 9-9' /gcci ?9F- , 4 .79 3 , • Name of Appellant y4,/ ��4. .e)��f 7 ha i ,_ ,tie 7/ Address W0 i1'i.-/y/f F."? Phone: @'c )5V5/3 j Approval of a general plan amendment to add senior overlay, approval Description of Application: _ of a change of zone from PR-7 (planned residential 7 units per acre) to PR-7 S.O. (planned residential senior overlay), precise plan of design/conditional use permit (including a height exception for the three (3) story portion, development agreement and a negative declaration of _ environmental impact as it relates to a proposed 256 unit continuing care retirement community, a community center building and a 99 bed Reason for Appeal: skilled nursing facility on i 3.04 acres on the west side of Fairhaven i �����fl�dre, Drive between Fred Waring Drive and Parkview Drive, 72-650 Fred Waring Drive and 72-755 Parkview Drive.��4 SignaturePP of Appellant Date?r22 P/ q FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY • #Date Appeal Filed: (3-".;--- Fee Received: `gyp 2--i - -, ' ;n1i7' Treasurer's Receipt #: ThZi` Received by: Public Hearing Set For: eE A Action taken by the City Council: Date: Sheila R. Gilligan, City Clerk MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: PHIL DRELL DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES DATE: OCTOBER 8, 1999 CASE NO.: GPA 99-3, C/Z 99-2, PP/CUP 99-7 and DA 99-3 SUBJECT: PEARL INDUSTRIES REVISED PLANS I. BACKGROUND On October 6, 1999, the applicant submitted revised architectural plans removing tower elements, reducing the height of the third story by three feet and the two-story element by two feet. As measured from curb height, the two-story element will be 15 feet, and the three- story element will be 25 feet with the community center building reduced from 42 feet to 28 feet. Given the setback of these elements, staff now believes that an exception to the 24-foot height limit can be justified. The revised elevations will be before the Architectural Review Commission on October 12, 1999. Based on the results of that meeting, a revised staff report and recommendation will be presented to Council on the 14th. wp\mem\pearl.rev y From = - 3.29. 1999 03:07 PM P01 9-29-99 Delivered by FAX to 760/341-7098 To: Planning Commission&City Council I City of Palm Desert 73510 Fred Waring Drive,Palm Desert,CA 92260 Tel.#760/346-0611 From: Dr.Harold Cozen Tel.#310/378-5976 1600 Cataluna Place, Palos Verdes Estates, CA 90274 Re: Case Nos. GPA 99-3,C/Z 99-2, PP/CUP 99-7 and DA 99-3 Public Hearing October 14, 1999 Transmittal: This single page Message: I have received the second of two Legal Notices regarding the subject development. Since 1979,we have been the continuous owners of a condominium in Monterey Sands addressed as 72-808 Fleetwood Circle,Palm Desert. We have reviewed the subject development and wish to go on record as strongly objecting to any changes In City of Palm Desert guidelines as they apply to this development,including,but not limited to, changes In zoning,height limits, planned residential units per acre and use. Overall,the project appears to be too dense and overbearing for the site. Signature by fax is deemed equivalent to signature on original document. Signed: Harold Cozen ►r/; ,A ' i • Shirley J.Coz•n pr =t:avgr) powir951.p.,t 2 9 1999 COMMUNITY `'ei.(a:`r;:;:Ni 1 DEPAR MENT CITY Or PALM DESERT • MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 21, 1999 being there with concerns about what Southwest Community Church was doing. He remembered going down their very good legitimate list and putting their feet to the fire and saying they would do this, this and that and they were initially unresponsive and the commission said they would lose their CUP if they didn't respond and they came back and did respond. He remembered nothing but thank you and expressions of appreciation. Where that changed he had no idea, but he felt the comments were undeserved and irresponsible. On a positive note, he was absolutely in favor of the application and would be willing to vote accordingly. Action: It was moved by Commissioner Beaty, seconded by Commissioner Campbell, approving the findings as presented by staff. Motion carried 5-0. It was moved by Commissioner Beaty, seconded by Commissioner Campbell, adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 1942, approving CUP 99-7, subject to conditions. Motion carried 5-0. CHAIRPERSON JONATHAN CALLED A ONE MINUTE RECESS AT 9:33 P.M. G. Case Nos. GPA 99-3, C/Z 99-2, PP/CUP 99-7 and DA 99-3 - PEARL INDUSTRIES INC., Applicant Request for approval of a general plan amendment to add senior overlay, approval of a change of zone from PR-7 (planned residential 7 units per acre) to PR-7 S.O. (planned residential senior overlay), precise plan of design/conditional use permit (including a height exception for the three (3) story portion, development agreement and a negative declaration of environmental impact as it relates to a proposed 256 unit continuing care retirement community, a community center building and a 99 bed skilled nursing facility on 13.04 acres on the west side of Fairhaven Drive between Fred Waring Drive and Parkview Drive, 72-650 Fred Waring Drive and 72-755 Parkview Drive. Mr. Smith noted that plans were on display. He said that commission received the full set of the applicant's plans in their packets. They also received a significant amount of correspondence. As well, they received correspondence 45 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 21, 1999 received after the packets were delivered on Friday and it was faxed today. In addition, material received today was distributed before tonight's meeting. Mr. Smith explained that the property was an irregularly shaped 13 acre site on the west side of Fairhaven. It was generally flat and the site has never been developed. Adjacent to the site to the east and north were single family homes. To the south was the Trader Joe's center and to the west was One Quail Place. The site was currently zoned Planned Residential, seven units per acre and was designated medium density residential, five to seven units per acre in the general plan. He noted that the project includes a 99 bed skilled nursing facility and a 250 unit continuing care retirement community. He noted that it was 250, not 256. He explained that the applicant had revised the plan since the legal notice was sent. The skilled nursing facility was proposed to be located adjacent to Fred Waring Drive. It was a single story, 18 foot high structure and has access from Fred Waring Drive. It connects to the rest of the site via an on-site driveway system. The continuing care component of the project is a three story 28 foot high building. The south wing faces Fairhaven Drive to the east and the north wing faces Parkview Drive. These two buildings connect at the community center building. The community center building contains a tower element that goes to 42 feet in height above the curb line. The rest of the project includes what he would describe as secondary tower elements which were 36 feet in height. All of the continuing care structure was at least two stories in height and 17 feet above the curb height. There was a plan on display that was a site plan highlighted in red and green. The red portion showed the two story elements and the green portion showed the three story 28 foot high portion of the plan. The third story setback from Fairhaven Drive would be 120 feet and the setback from Parkview to the third story element would be 1 17'/2 feet. Main access to the continuing care buildings would be from Parkview Drive at the east limit of the property. This access led to surface parking, to underground parking and a valet drop off at the community building. At the west end of the site on Parkview and on the north end of Fairhaven Drive, gated emergency vehicle only access points would be provided. The table at the bottom of page 2 of the report showed that all the units were considerably in excess of the minimum prescribed by code. The table on page 3 notes that the project meets or exceeds the setback requirements, coverage and parking. The table also noted that the project did not comply with the height limit. The PR zone and the Senior Overlay District limit maximum height to two story and 22 feet for flat roofed structures. The project as shown proposed a net height of 28 feet above the adjacent curb. The applicant was seeking an exception to the 46 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 21, 1999 height and the number of stories. Staff had a series of concerns with the proposal. First, the access. They initially had concerns with the access in that it was originally proposed off of Fairhaven Drive. The plan was amended and proposed access from Parkview Drive and that was acceptable and there was a traffic impact analysis that was provided by the applicant which indicates that access could be provided from Parkview Drive without negatively impacting the flow of traffic on Parkview. Secondly, staff was concerned with the building height, the number of stories and the mass. The PR zone and Senior Overlay limited height to two stories and 22 feet. The plan originally proposed three stories and 33 feet. In an effort to reduce the height, the applicant proposes to depress the structure five feet into the ground. That would put the first floor five feet below curb height, reducing building height to 28 feet above the curb. Additionally, the applicant eliminated several of the third story units to help break up the roof line and that was at the suggestion of the Architectural Review Commission. They also eliminated the third floor units closest to Fairhaven Drive and Parkview Drive. He indicated that when staff first received the proposal, it had 280 units and now they were at 250. Notwithstanding all the mitigation that the applicant has designed into the project, staff could not support an exception to the height of the building. As commission would recall, height exceptions have been granted in the PR zone: to the Marriott timeshare development at Monterey and Frank Sinatra, and for the Courtyard Hotel at Frank Sinatra and Cook Street. In both these instances they have hundreds of feet of separation between existing residences and the proposed buildings. In fact, both projects were located on golf courses. The extensive separation became the finding that supported the exception, both by this commission and by the City Council. In the case of the timeshare development, the exceptional separation resulted in the neighborhood eventually supporting the project. In this case they didn't have hundreds of feet of separation. The site was an infill situation in a developed neighborhood. Staff felt that the proposed 28 foot high structure did not warrant a height exception. Other concerns of staff with the proposal include the landscaping. There wasn't adequate landscaping on the east side of the building adjacent to Fairhaven Drive. There appeared to be a solution to that and the applicant was generally amenable to that were the project to proceed, but he pointed it out that there were concerns with the lack of landscaping there. August 24 the applicant obtained conceptual approval of the architecture from ARC with the direction to improve it. The applicant revised the plans and returned to ARC September 14. At that time ARC once again was not prepared to grant preliminary approval. ARC felt that while the 47 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 21, 1999 applicant had taken many steps to mitigate the building height, the architecture was not yet acceptable. Minutes of that meeting were included with the commission packets. ARC ultimately concluded that the plans could be made acceptable, but before the applicant spent additional funds addressing these architectural concerns, the issue of the building height needed to be resolved. Mr. Smith indicated that the applicant has held at least one meeting with the neighborhood and thought it had been more than that. On April 24, 1999, following that meeting, the city received 31 letters of objection. At the bottom of page 7 of the staff report the issues raised were delineated in those letters of objection. They ranged from excessive density, excessive traffic, building mass, view blockage, incompatible with the neighborhood, decrease in property values, noise, inconvenience during construction, noise of emergency vehicles, project is unneeded when others are available, and at that point the project included access from Fairhaven Drive. The revised project moved the access from Fairhaven to Parkview. The access from Fairhaven would be for emergency vehicles only. The traffic report concluded that the project would have a minimum impact at the studied intersections during the peak hours. The traffic report also concluded that the traffic flow on Parkview would remain acceptable. The other areas of concern of the residents were grouped into two categories. One, that the density at 23 units per acre was incompatible with single family residential dwellings. Two, that the building height 28 feet above curb and the mass was incompatible with the neighborhood, would impair views and decrease property values. With respect to the density intensity issue, One Quail Place next door was 22 units per acre, so it could be done differently. In the matter of item two, staff concurred that the height exception to permit 28 feet was not warranted. In conclusion, staff felt that the applicant was proposing a high quality residential ownership project which is a combination of independent living, assisted living and skilled nursing. The project included 318 underground parking spaces plus surface spaces and provided 184 more parking spaces than required by code. The units ranged in size from 824 square feet to 1 ,655 square feet. Notwithstanding that, staff still came back to the fact that it is too high. At 28 feet it didn't meet code and staff couldn't come up with a reason that it should be granted an exception. If the Planning Commission felt this was a desirable project which should be approved, staff would request that the matter be continued to a date certain and refer the matter back to staff for preparation of the environmental documentation, resolution of approval and development agreement and processing of a zoning ordinance amendment to increase the permitted building height in the Senior Overlay. That building 48 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 21, 1999 height increase would apply to all such projects. Environmentally, staff was recommending that the project not be approved so staff had not given commission the environmental documentation in that without a project, they didn't need to assess it. If the commission wanted to proceed with the project, then staff would come back to them with appropriate environmental documentation at that time. Staff's recommendation was that commission adopt Resolution No. 1943 denying cases GPA 99-3, C/Z 99-2, PP/CUP 99-7 and Development Agreement 99-3. He asked for any questions. Commissioner Campbell asked Mr. Smith of the 184 parking spaces they have that they didn't need, how much land that took up. Mr. Smith said it took up 29 spaces along Fairhaven Drive for sure and took up a small area at the entrance south of Parkview Drive and the rest of them were underground. Commissioner Campbell asked if it would be as long as a city block. Mr. Smith said it was 300 feet per parking space and he was being told about 30,000 square feet or two-thirds of an acre. Chairperson Jonathan asked why there would be an amendment to the zoning ordinance as opposed to just an exception to the ordinance. Mr. Smith said it was because staff could not find a reason to grant the exception to the height. They don't have the separation they had in the other instances. The commission could come up with another reason, but from a staff perspective they couldn't find a finding that would support the height exception. Chairperson Jonathan said he wasn't suggesting that they were going to do that, but if the commission determined that there was a finding for an exception, then they could grant an exception rather than an amendment to the zone. Mr. Smith said that was correct. Mr. Drell said that staff would recommend that the exception identify something unusual and specific to this project and this design because if they didn't then they were in fact creating a zoning ordinance amendment. Chairperson Jonathan said that one possible exception, and he wasn't sure it was, but he thought the applicant had made the point and it was there in the chart, that as a result of the greater setback, the line of site even including the three story was better than it would be being lower than it would be if the project were only two story but closer to the property border and still staying within ordinance. In other words, the implication was that would be the findings. That the line of sight issue resulting from three stories was mitigated through proper and adequate setbacks. He asked if staff and considered that argument. Mr. Smith said he believed he had and they went through a similar discussion when they were 49 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 21, 1999 dealing with the Damone Group where they got the building down, but they were still dealing with the mass of the building. They were talking about a very long building without side yards. If these were single family homes across the street at 20 feet in height, this would have ten feet of side yard setback on each lot so there would be 20 foot view corridors. Chairperson Jonathan opened the public hearing and asked the applicant to address the commission. MR. CHARLIE SWEET, 43-708 Virginia Avenue in Palm Desert, thanked the commission for visiting the site to view their balloon display. As pointed out by Steve Smith, they had the balloons 12 feet too close to the street so it would be setback even further, but they made that adjustment. He thanked Mr. Smith for the nice presentation and felt he hit all the important points. He said he wanted to take this time and opportunity to go through the history of why they selected this site. The continuing care retirement community was certainly well needed in the valley, as it is through most of the nation and the state of California. The site in question was selected primarily because of its great proximity to the local services. The users of the site, those residents, desire the proximity of those services. The facility functions the best and it yielded them a higher quality of life that they look for. And that was the bottom line. When they selected this site they had quite a few issues they had to contend with. They first anticipated the major ingress and egress on Fairhaven Drive and local neighbors certainly expressed their view point to him very clearly. He held a public forum for them at the Palm Desert Board of Realtors and he invited the 65 homes to the east of the subject site. Six of those out of the 65 that were invited appeared and about 70 residents from the city of Rancho Mirage appeared. It was quite obvious that they had many concerns. View was one of them and it was at that point that they decided to drop the grade of the subject site by five feet to mitigate that portion of the altitude concern. They also elected to keep Fairhaven Drive closed and have all the major ingress and egress on Parkview Drive. The traffic study they had completed by RFB as submitted to the City indicates average daily traffic on Parkview Drive of 5,400 cars per 24 hours. That was for both easterly and westerly directions. The study also indicated that at peak hours this project would add about 13 cars per hour from their Parkview driveway and about 11 cars per hour from 50 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 21, 1999 the skilled nursing facility over on Fred Waring. In regards to the altitude of the building, 17 feet from the curb height on the two story structures, 28 feet height from the three stories and as mentioned a little earlier, the architects designed these residential wings in the spirit and in consideration of the height and setbacks of the statutes. They tried to achieve several goals. Number one was to preserve or improve the line of sight, which he believed they did. Number two was economically to have sufficient amount of units so that the job penciled and was economically feasible. If they were to put more units on the surface, they would lose open space, it would degrade the community and would not function well because as they could see on the landscape plan they have numerous onsite drainage facilities. They couldn't go any deeper than five feet and maintain the drainage facilities. They had taken it to the limit there. In their review at Architectural Review, they had a very good idea which he believed they would adopt in regards to the landscaping on Fairhaven. They were so over parked that they could comfortably delete about 29 or 30 spaces on Fairhaven and remove that walled landscape treatment and instead berm that area which would give it a much softer effect to the landscaping on Fairhaven. Fairhaven would remain closed and the berm effect should actually help the neighborhood quite a bit. They also bought a piece of land from the Baptist Church that was 72 feet wide at the northerly portion of their land which connects their skilled nursing facility with the residential buildings. Prior to this project commencing the church was going to go forward and improve their corner and relandscape and rebuild their church parking lot. That would improve that corner as well. They believed this to be the highest and best use of this land. It was very well located for a continuing care retirement community and they thought they had addressed all the issues as best as possible and they had certainly taken into account the community's concerns. In regard to the folks living in Rancho Mirage, he showed a couple of pictures. He showed the 28 foot level of their residential building which was on the north portion of the property and said that this photograph was taken out of the backyard of one of the homes at Ridgeview currently under construction. He said that the roof line would not exceed the existing tree line at One Quail. He showed a similar shot standing at the curb inside the subdivision at Ridgeview and the line was at the 28 foot level. It indicated that the view would not interrupt the tree line. He noted that Mr. Alvarez had the photographs on file. He showed a photo 51 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 21, 1999 at the gate of the Estates in Rancho Mirage and said that it was about 525 feet from their exit gate to their property line. Once again the line delineated the 28 foot high level of the residential building and pointed out the One Quail apartments in the background. Once again, he said it couldn't deter their tree line view. He believed the main issue here was the four feet as they have it proposed, the 28 feet. They were working under the assumption that the maximum was 24 feet and they just learned about that ten days to two weeks ago that 24 feet was if the structure had a pitched roof and 22 for a flat roof. Regardless, they were at the 28 foot height and respectfully requested that it be passed. They have 60 units on the third floor and for the integrity of the project and the benefit of the future residents, they would like to go forward with that. He thanked the commission. Commissioner Finerty asked if Mr. Sweet had ever built a project similar to this. Mr. Sweet said no, he wasn't a builder. He was in the development business and had been involved in the financing and development of other projects like this. Commissioner Finerty asked for an example. Mr. Sweet said a continuing care retirement community in La Jolla, California. Commissioner Finerty asked if Mr. Sweet had an operator. Mr. Sweet said yes, that he was present at the meeting. Mr. Jim Kobika. MR. JIM KOBIKA, Home Place Retirement Communities of America located at 1135 Camino del Mar in Del Mar, respectfully wanted to thank the commission and everyone for staying this evening and hoped they were all present in support of the project. Mr. Kobika said he has been in the business for 15 years as of May of 2000. He has had several thousand residents live in his communities. He understood the client that they service very, very well. He said there were two reasons they decided on this location. One was location as mentioned by Mr. 52 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 21, 1999 Sweet. Their normal community when they first open it up the normal resident was in the age range of 75 years old. About 70% of them were married at the time. What they do is live pretty independently in the main building. Over time, and he has been in the business 15 years so some of the communities that are 15 years old he was still experiencing the residents that originally moved in. What happens to them is that they slow up a bit. When they originally move in they do lots of traveling, they are still going to Europe and enjoying the same things and conveniences that we do. As time marches on, they become slower and some get on a walker. They can't negotiate a step in the building and the elevators were very important. The hallway system was very important because they have a full service restaurant and they enjoy that convenience every day. In order to get there they had to basically walk there every day. In some instances it took them a while to get there because sometimes they were only walking six inches at a time. That is the reason why they wanted to make the building as compact as possible and to help staff along with reasons why they would like to have this in a four story environment and were suffering the consequences of putting it in the ground which frankly they didn't like to do because they believed their residents should have the same quality of life that we deserve. His house wasn't four feet in the ground and they were hoping they wouldn't have to go to that extent, but they have on this project. He understood that they were encroaching on the height, but they were doing it for a good reason. They were doing it because they wanted to keep the hallway systems as short as possible to provide for their residents to have the conveniences and the quality of life they deserve and that was the reason they were asking for some help on the height of this building so that they could reduce the length of the hallways. They loved the site and the demographics, loved the area and would be a good neighbor. They didn't have sound problems or traffic problems, they didn't have a demand on the public services, the Fire Department and had their own security service on site 24 hours around the clock. They had their own nursing station inside the independent building should their be an occurrence. There were no lights or sirens or ambulances running 70 mph down their street at 2:00 a.m. The individual would be stabilized by the 24 hour nursing staff and the ambulance would come without the lights and sirens on in a very respectful manner. They have several conveniences on site, libraries, work out spas, indoor pools, and it was basically a cruise boat 53 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 21, 1999 on land. That was what they believed this particular site demanded and that this area was in need of. They believed this project was exactly what was the correct use of this site. In closing, he wanted to tell a story. Over the weekend he was invited to a wedding. This gentleman had 55 years with a beautiful woman. She passed away and he got remarried over the weekend. He was invited. The man was 78 years old and he was the very same guy that climbed on a ship after Pearl Harbor was bombed and was asked to go to Japan and bomb it and he did that and he was very much like the guys that live in his communities. They are salt of the earth, they've done lots for our lives and his life, and they have actually given it to him for free. He loved him and had a heart for them. He wasn't here because of the financial part of the business. He didn't need to be here and didn't need any more communities. He didn't need any more residents but he loved the business and loved to develop good projects in good areas. That individual whose wedding he went to over the weekend was his Dad. He knew these people and knew them well and they deserved the best. He thanked the commission. Chairperson Jonathan noted that the applicant would have an opportunity for rebuttal. He indicated that there were cards submitted to speak in FAVOR and OPPOSITION. The commission would entertain the comments in favor of the application first. He requested Ken Savage to address the commission. MR. KEN SAVAGE 72-897 Sierra Vista in Palm Desert, said they have lived there for 29 years and happened to live right next to the Town Center. He had been thinking that the buildings in the Town Center have never blocked their view. What blocks their view are the trees on the berm. As a matter of fact, if they looked at the site what blocked the view to the west were the trees that extend considerably above One Quail Place. He understood the height requirements for the buildings, but in reality that was kind of ridiculous because they were really dealing with trees. The thing that impressed him was the use and he couldn't imagine a better use for that property and also the fact that he appreciated about Palm Desert was its diversity. They don't live in an elite community like some of the other communities concede themselves to be. He was thankful that Palm Desert let him live here. He thought it could be open to this kind of a project. He wasn't aware of the conflict of the height and the previous conditions, but he pointed 54 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 21, 1999 out that height of buildings was really insignificant if trees block views and if a view is to be blocked, that was what happened. MR. DOUG WOFFORD stated that he was present as a friend on behalf of Mr. Sweet's project. He said it was a project that was very near and dear to his heart. He informed commission that he has been a chiropractor here for 30 years. He wanted to take a moment to address the commission on what he considered to be the true purpose of the weight of the matter for their decision. In their golden years they have the least representation and were least able to change their lives. Those were the people that would be living here. In his years of practice, he said they were some of the finest people you could meet and most considerate, but they were very frail and couldn't speak for themselves. Mr. Sweet comes along, and he has known Charlie all his life or at least for the last 30 years, and he has always thought about the city of Palm Desert first. He was very concerned about, along with his father Roland. He said this seemed to be a good project. Mr. Wofford said he was concerned as well as the residents that live here how that would effect his street. These were the weights of the commission's consideration tonight. However, from what he has seen on Country Club and other landscaping techniques used, they can overcome a lot of problems including the distance problems with unique architecture. He thought they could compromise and when they do compromise they would know they were doing it not for just a building developer that wants to make money, but for a sincere desire to improve our community and the commission as the government had the ability of making this a better place for our seniors and all concerned. He said his hopes were with the commission in this moment of their consideration. MR. AND MRS. JOHN MCCORMICK, 72-669 Eagle Road Apartment 2 in Palm Desert, stated that he was a friend of Mr. Sweet's and he brought this to him and talked to him about six months ago and what he really liked about it was that everything was really compact and everything was available within itself and they didn't have to go outside the area for any amenities, as well as being able to go across the street to Trader Joe's or to Michael's or the shopping mall. He thought this was a great project for older people and hoped the commission would approve the project. 55 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 21, 1999 MR. JOE WEIBLE, a resident of Silver Spur RV Park on Highway 74, stated that he was also a friend of Mr. Sweet's. He had seen the plans and had discussions of the makeup of the facility. The project appealed to him because he was getting to that age where he thinks about where he is going to end up for the rest of those golden years. He noted that he lives alone at the present time, but a few years down the road he would probably like to be surrounded by a nice place and the health facilities if he needed them. He liked the location very much and spent a lot of time at the library which is close by and the shopping would be convenient. He thought the project would be an asset to the community. MR. KENNY KATZ, 77-587 Ashberry Court in Palm Desert, said he was very new to the area and had been here about a year and a half. He thought it was like living in a paradise. He came out of London and was there for the last 33 years and although they get all the wonderful architecture and some great buildings and wonderful places to move around, it had become congested and ugly and it was undesirable and was happy to end up in a paradise like this one. Every time they drive and go someplace what they see around them is beauty. They were always flabbergasted by the picture postcard nature of the things they see around here. What disturbed him was when they drive along the street and there was a two story office building sitting along the edge and it blocked that view. He had come here to support this project because he has watched changes Charlie has made and coming out of resort development himself, he could appreciate what is going on. One of the most important aspects here, aside from density because that wasn't an issue he could concern himself with, was the view. If they could improve the view and even they go up a little in the middle, but everyone could appreciate what was around them because they haven't blocked it coming out and he thought the project deserved special attention and special consideration. MR. ROLAND SWEET, Charlie's father, stated that unfortunately he no longer lived in Palm Desert, but spent 28 years here. Last year his children prevailed upon him to not live by himself any more and he was living with one of his children. Before that he lived in the Carlotta, a retirement facility in Palm Desert right in the middle of a residential section. One of the things that impressed him about it was that there 56 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 21, 1999 was absolutely no disturbance that he could see to the residents surrounding it because people his age, and he was 90 years old, don't do a lot of hollering, don't get drunk, don't drive fast and they were a very quiet neighborhood. He strongly recommended to the commission this project for three reasons. The first reason was that this was probably the best physical project with the most amenities of any project that he has ever seen and he has seen quite a few of them. He bought the first one of these in Las Vegas, Nevada. So he knew something about it. Since that time he had appraised some of them. This project was going to be extremely deluxe, would have underground parking, valet service, and more amenities than any of the existing facilities, even than the ones under construction. He thought it would be a great asset to the city. He knew there was some concern about the height, but as seen by the diagram, on the west side of the property the trees were higher than the 28 foot building. On the other side there were residential houses, but they were about 120 feet from the closest building on this project. The second reason why he thought this was a good thing was because it would put about $50 million on the tax roll. The third thing was that it would employ about 125 new people who would be an asset to the city. Among those people would be doctors, nurses and it would really be an asset to the city in every way he could think of. He said he was ready for one of these projects himself. MR. JAMES KEERAN, 44-795 San Jose Avenue, said he was a member of the University Baptist Church so they would be neighbors to this project and he listened to people say something about the views and everything else. He agreed that yes, when they first move in they have a view and then they plant a tree and do different things, get their umbrellas out by their pools and all of a sudden views are gone in about five years and he knew the people in Rancho Mirage were concerned about their view. Being an ex-engineer, he looked at it and noticed that most of their houses over there faced east and west. Really their view was the mountain on that side and on the east side they had a wall behind them. He knew they were concerned about views, but he was too. This was just one of those things. They lived down here, enjoyed it and everything else, but he did the same thing. Planted a tree and the next thing he knew his view was gone. His neighbors have all blocked his view but he enjoyed the area he was at and was really in favor of the project because he was getting up to that age and he might have to 57 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 21, 1999 have something like this and he would really appreciate it being here in Palm Desert. Chairperson Jonathan said he would entertain testimony in opposition and asked Ms. Nancy Singer to address the commission. MS. NANCY SINGER, 6 Navato Terrace in The Estates at Rancho Mirage, thanked the commission for the opportunity to speak. She said that they in Rancho Mirage realize that they do not have the standing before the commission that Palm Desert residents might have, but they were Palm Desert's neighbors and were part of Palm Desert's community and Palm Desert was part of their community. There was mention made several times of a community meeting held back in April. They being directly across the street were notified about it. They were the ones who got together those 70 other people in about six hours notice because people were so concerned about this project and they came. They felt that senior housing was a great thing and they weren't opposed to this being senior housing. What they were opposed to was some of the parameters presented here. They were concerned that the project, the way it is presented would be a detriment to the community of both Palm Desert and Rancho Mirage and that immediate area. They agreed with the staff report on the height and felt the height was just too much. There seemed to be a lot said about the 28 feet for the residential part, but not a whole lot had been said about the 42 or 44 feet for the community center, which was a major part of this complex. That was much higher. That hadn't been addressed. They would very happy with a 19 foot high maximum like the steel building at Temple Sinai. They were concerned with the density. They knew that back in May the commission denied a 16 per acre project for senior living at Hovley and Monterey. This project being 23 was an even greater density so they were concerned with that. They were basically concerned with the incompatibility in the neighborhood and the traffic that would be generated. They knew there had been a traffic study done by the developer. She personally talked with the Planning Department for the city of Rancho Mirage, who have also done traffic studies on Parkview and the developers traffic study differs from the traffic study by Rancho Mirage. Rancho Mirage hadn't done one recently. Among things happening right now that they don't believe the developer took into account when he was considering the traffic was 58 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 21, 1999 the fact that there were now two new complexes being built, Ridgeview and White Sun Estates, which comprised an additional 88 homes, the blocking of several streets in the Fairhaven area that the commission approved created more traffic on Parkview. There was a group of homes opposite, she wasn't sure what the area was called, but opposite the Outback Steakhouse on the other side of Parkview where because of a change in the way the street was configured in the Rancho Las Palmas shopping center people were all using Parkview a lot more than they did before. In addition to the residents of this new complex, there would be three shifts of workers. They would all have cars too and would be driving in and out. So there was a lot of traffic to be considered other than the residents who would also have visitors using these areas. They were very concerned with that. Sure they were concerned with their views, but that was not a major concern of theirs. They recognized all the issues that had been brought up on the views, but they were concerned with the compatibility in the neighborhood, with noise and while it was stated that there wouldn't be noise, they all knew there would be noise with that many additional people. They were concerned with the environmental effects of commercial waste. This would be a commercial property, not a residential property. People would be served by staff members who are paid, they would buy into the units but wouldn't really own them because when they move out by whatever means, the units reverted to the owner of the property, they didn't pass them onto their own heirs. This was really more of a commercial project than a residential project. They too were concerned with the quality of life that has been mentioned with the aesthetics in the area. They were concerned with the landscaping along Parkview. Right now the developer of Ridgeview, John Kearney who is a Palm Desert resident, was doing a lot of landscaping on their side of Parkview and from what she saw, this didn't seem to be compatible landscaping so they would have one street with two sides that were incompatible. That didn't speak well for the community and didn't look good for people in the community. That would affect their aesthetics. It was all these issues built into it and while they weren't opposed to senior housing and thought that would be a good use of the property of the area, they were just opposed to some of these parameters that had been presented. She also wanted to add a thank you to the Planning Department and Steve Smith in particular because he had been most 59 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 21, 1999 cooperative in providing them with answers and information and they really appreciated his time and efforts. MS. JUDI ROGERS, 43-840 Fairhaven Drive, stated that she was obviously one of the closest residents to the area and everyone had brought up the tree issue at One Quail Place, which as she understood it and could be wrong, but the trees were diseased and were coming out and would no longer pose a view issue. For this to be allowed in their area, they were already being shut out by Trader Joe's and all of the office complexes, etc. She felt they have been somewhat helped along the way now that their streets were closed off. It had been a tremendous impact to their neighborhood and they no longer experience people parking on their side of the roads and drinking and having parties, etc. She knew that the main issue here was trying to do a new zone, residential Senior Overlay, and she felt that in their area it was just not warranted. All of the others being built, and there were several right now, were being built farther toward Eisenhower Hospital and they were out where there were no residential areas immediately backing into it. The amount of traffic that it would take to make this place work was inconceivable. When they moved in 14 years ago they had a little house on a third of an acre and they expanded the house to 3,000 square feet with a pool and they have a very nice area to live in right in the heart of Palm Desert. They never thought they would make a good real estate investment like that, that they came in too late for all of that, but they were very happy there and they wanted to stay even given the traffic increase on Fred Waring. They knew that was part of their noise problem, but to allow a project of this magnitude would completely disintegrate their property values. They have a wonderful view right now of the Banning Pass area and knew that would be somewhat disfigured and they couldn't stop development and knew that, however, they did really have an issue with the height. The three stories was bad enough, but the towers had to be considered. She didn't care if it wasn't any where near as wide as a three story building, it still was an element that would block their view and add to their noise factor. They weren't opposed to a senior citizen living area. She asked what could be better for their kids to grow up around people that are quiet and lawful. That had nothing to do with it. It had to do with the fact that it is a commercial enterprise and was bound to make quite a bit of money, increase the traffic flow. She felt that Parkview was much 60 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 21, 1999 better able to handle it than Fairhaven, however, neither one was slated for that kind of traffic. She appreciated the commission listening to everyone and they had stayed a long time tonight just to be able to voice their opinion. Some of the ladies with little ones left but there was major neighborhood concern that something like this would be approved with this density in the current proposal. MR. JOHN MARTINEZ stated that he was wearing two hats. One was because he owns the property directly east of the project, an apartment house on three acres of land at one story. He built those ten years ago. The other was as a resident of Palm Desert at 72-777 Fleetwood, directly across the street from the project. He said he didn't hear anything from staff about the 44 foot high towers. He was presented the site plan about three or four months ago and at that time the entrance was off of Fred Waring and Fairhaven. Now he understood that was changed to be off of Parkview. When he built the 26 units ten years ago, staff said to stay with the zone, don't change it. Seven units per acre was all he could get. He even tried a two story and staff wouldn't let him do it. Now things have changed and he understood that, but he thought it should stay with the zone. The applicant said that there were 11 cars an hour on Parkview and he was going to have 120 employees. With all the closing of the existing R-1 property east of him, then Parkview would create more traffic. As to the three stories, he thought that was ridiculous. Here is Parkview with nothing but residents, apartments and housing and single family residents and the entrance to the college. He thought a commercial piece of property like this should not be in a residential area. This was a commercial project and the lady who spoke before him said this also. It is a business and there was no question about that. He thought it would create more noise and there was a lot of traffic on Fred Waring and was why they use Parkview. Again, when they get to the end of Parkview they had Monterey on one side and Highway 1 1 1 . People avoid Fred Waring by going down Parkview. He was against the project with that many units per acre. That was what he was basically against. The applicant said that in April he notified everyone in the immediate area. Unfortunately he was the only one from Fleetwood, 50 units, that was even here today. Most of the people he talked with today didn't even know there was a meeting tonight on this. He didn't know who he notified, but he didn't notify the people that live directly in the area. He 61 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 21, 1999 was against it; not against the project alone, but only against too many units and too high. MS. KATHLEEN HUDGINS, 72-799 Arboleda Drive in Palm Desert, said that she has been a registered nurse for 32 years and this was a business. It was not a residential thing. It was a business. This business was bigger than Eisenhower Medical Center, which was only 240 some beds. This gentleman was proposing 350 some residents. It was going to be a 24 hour a day, three shifts, people coming in, there would have to be lighting at night for the safety of the employees coming and going, which would also impact them. The line of sight and trees was not the issue. It was going to be 24 hours a day bright lights. There was going to be medical waste, needles, syringes, bandages, all of that stuff, and there would be food waste. They were all concerns. She said it was zoned for residential and she believed that the Planning Commission should keep it residential. MR. JERRY ROGERS, 48-840 Fairhaven Drive, said he found it perplexing that the majority of the supporters of this project didn't live in the area. The two that did kind of live in the area were the church, which was not really impacted because they go home and the project remains. There were two other projects in Palm Desert of this caliber and this stature as far as elevation and those were alluded to in the staff report. There was a staff report before commission that recommended denying this project. He concurred with that wholeheartedly. The other thing he wanted to make a point of was that this project area was surrounded by three residential communities. One in Rancho Mirage, One Quail Place and the neighborhood where he lives. There was another area that borders on Fred Waring that was a commercial zoned property where the church was located. Again, sticking this in an infill project right in the middle of a residential area made no sense. MR. ROD MURPHY, 72-764 Arboleda in Palm Desert, said his primary issue was the zone change from R-7 to the Senior Overlay which would allow 91 units versus 300 units, a 280% increase to the zoning as it is now. It was not consistent with the area. The area to the east of it where he lives and where most of the people here that got up to speak tonight live, he wasn't quite sure what the zoning there was, but he 62 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 21, 1999 thought it was an R-3. The height of the building was simply out of the question. It was like sitting an aircraft carrier down along side his house. He has seen the side of an aircraft carrier and he didn't want to see them any more. Regarding the issue of the trees, he went to the Architectural Review and the issue of the trees came up in there and staff had mentioned that those trees would be trimmed or removed because they were the eucalyptus trees which grow very quickly and very tall. His other concern was that there was going to be a restaurant there. That restaurant would require a grease trap and that grease trap would have odors. There would be commercial waste from the restaurant and commercial waste from the hospital as one of the neighbors already mentioned. In essence, he had nothing against a senior home and he would end up there himself sometime, but not there. MR. PAGE QUILLING, 72-845 Arboleda, stated that he lived right down the street from Mr. Murphy. He too was at the Architectural Review process they had last week. He said the pictures were beautiful but they didn't show the back of the buildings which was what they would be looking at. The developer did take him outside and whipped out the blueprints to show him since he was in the building industry also. He thought it looked an awful lot like the Hyatt Grand Champions, probably real effective, but not real good looking. The other thing was even if he thought they could justify doing the Senior Overlay and doing that many units, he didn't think it would be fair to their neighborhood when it was already done to One Quail Place. They would be sticking two projects of that density right next to each other. He thought they actually backed up to each other. That one had already been rezoned and was would be super dense if they did two lots next to each other. He couldn't see it happening. Chairperson Jonathan asked if there were any rebuttal comments. MR. DAVID MOREHEAD, representing Pearl Industries, 81 -088 Highway 1 1 1 in Indio, stated that they were asking for an exception. They were asking for one unit per acre of an exception as far as density went more than Quail Place. There had been comments that this type of density would increase traffic and cause more noise to the neighborhood. Studies had shown, and he was pretty sure of the people 63 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 21, 1999 knowledgeable of this type of facility, that seniors have less impact density wise on a community than a single family residence. Plus there was usually only one or two people per unit versus a family with kids and the noise that comes happily with that. That was the entire purpose and reason for there being a Senior Overlay in the first place. The justification was that it mitigates somewhat the increased noise and traffic because this type of individual didn't use their home in the same manner. A typical situation would be where usage of this property for this project where a couple of different ages where perhaps a gentleman needs more care than his wife and they move into this facility, rather than being on the outskirts of town and having to catch a long shuttle ride, the spouse who may not be needing day to day care but could not drive. That was their purpose in picking this location versus on the outskirts of town where it would be less inconvenient for the people in the surrounding neighborhoods. They were hoping to put in a project that would give 200+ seniors the ability to maintain their dignity of life which he believed they deserved. They weren't asking for anything but were stepping forward with what they deserved. The reason they had the views they have and the city that was laid out the way it is was in large part because of the seniors of which they were trying to design a facility where they could afford to stay in the action so to speak where things are happening downtown. This particular facility would have an immediate draw for what could be called the World War II generation. There was a lot said that could take the remainder of the night about that generation and what they deserve, but he didn't want to elaborate on that. He thought that if they were all lucky enough, they would be in the group that were asking to make the compromise for tonight. They were asking for a four foot compromise for a group of people that very rarely ask for anything from our society. It was a group of people that unlike most other groups that we make compromises for, and deservedly so, handicapped, low income and various other groups. This was a group that we all eventually will be a member of. Because of the fact that this group is not coming with hat in hand and they were coming with income and equity and would be able to add to the community and would not as previously said increase the noise factor. He didn't think it took much if they thought about the type of individual that would be using this they would not be out in the streets with bicycles or causing a lot of traffic via cars. There were some comments about the service side of this business and what that would do to the 64 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 21 , 1999 residents. He said that the infrastructure of the building was designed to have the service entrance to be from Fred Waring along the back side of the property so the neighbors particularly on Fairhaven would not be impacted whatsoever from that. When they were talking with different neighbors about the issue trying to get them to take a look at the fact of the issue, they found very few people that were really interested in seeing the fact that if they designed the building the way they were proposing to design it, the line of sight was enhanced over what the city's normal setback would be designed for. So they weren't really cutting back on a view over what would be improved by regular city zoning. The fact that there was a third floor had brought a lot of misunderstanding to how high the third floor was. They had gone to great expense of lowering their property to make that just four feet and that four feet, they couldn't see from the curb on either side of either Parkview of Fairhaven. They could see the third floor of this property. Lowering it four feet would not make much difference. There was a comment made at the Architectural Review Committee meeting that it was possible that at some distance from the property they would be able to see the third floor and after taking a drive down the street it was hard to find that distance but the further they went from a project such as this the third floor or anything became visible, but it had a tendency as common sense would tell, that that particular aspect of what they were viewing was smaller relative to the background. The further they back up, they would actually see more of the view, more of the mountains, than they would at any other point. The critical point of view blockage would be across the street on either sides of this property. Both from measuring and putting up poles and balloons and that sort of thing, they have proved what the engineers and architects put together. The line of sight was not diminished. It kind of boiled the issue down. If the line of sight was not diminished, what was the issue of height really. The issue of density he believed was mitigated by the fact that the Senior Overlay took into account density and allowed a higher density because the people have less of an impact on the social lives of the surrounding people. He would hate to put this group of people on the outskirts of town and the precedence that would set, both from the standpoint of this city's future as well as the future of them and individuals that would come to need the facility at some point. 65 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 21, 1999 Chairperson Jonathan closed the public hearing and asked for commission comments. Commissioner Finerty thanked all the residents for coming out and participating in the process. This was what made it easier for them to make a decision. She appreciated all the talk about World War II and they couldn't be talking to a more patriotic person than herself, however, tonight it wasn't about appreciating what they did for our generation, it was about keeping the standards set forth in the city of Palm Desert to ensure our quality of life. She concurred with Nurse Hudgins with regard to this being more commercial than residential. It is a 24 hour a day operation. She has been in Manor Care and Hacienda de Monterey and was quite familiar with what takes place at these facilities. She also believed that a three story structure was out of place in this community that is surrounded by all residential uses and that 28 feet high for the building and the 42 foot parapet was not the direction she would like to see the city go in. She would really like to hold our standards to the 22 and 24 feet and that it was really important. Therefore, she was opposed to the project. Commissioner Campbell also thanked everyone for being present and thought it was a great project and was in a good location close to all the shopping areas and so forth for the residents that would be living there. As far as the traffic on Parkview, she didn't think there would be an impact in any way. She didn't feel there was a problem with the view for the residents at The Estates in Rancho Mirage, especially after seeing the picture of their gate coming out of their community, they weren't even fronting on the project. The only thing she did have a problem with was the change of zone. She would hate to go ahead and have approved this project for what it is because then they would have a precedent to have the same approval in other areas of the city. If the project could be scaled down, she would be the first one to go ahead and say yes, go ahead with it. This was why she was asking about the over parking the project has. They have 2.3 acres of land that would be available if they removed some of the extra parking. If there was any way that they could go ahead and remove the third story. That would really be her only problem, just really the change of zone and the height. Otherwise, it was a great project and she wouldn't have a problem with having it in that location. Commissioner Lopez said this was a very difficult one for him personally. He said he had driven around the area and walked the area in the last week 66 3"6 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 21, 1999 looking at all the different aspects of this location. He appreciated everyone taking the time and was personally impressed that a 90 year old man could stay up later than he could. He walked in the back yards of the homes that are being built across the street and reviewed the views from the backs of those yards and it had been difficult. He too had a problem with the height and the mass as he walked about and envisioned what would be there. He thought the concept was great and knew that he would be in it someday and was looking for a place for his Mom, but he did have a problem with the overall height and the location as it currently exists. He would have to go along with staff on this situation. Commissioner Beaty shared Commissioner Lopez's struggle. He purchased his home right across the street from The Carlotta. The Carlotta was already there. He thought the concerns about traffic and so forth were unfounded. The only real impact they notice is the service vehicles and it sounded like that had been taken care of by relocating the service drive, but he would concur with his fellow commissioners on the density issue and height issue. Chairperson Jonathan said he was a little bit on the fence with this one. He could see the pros and cons and would start off saying that in general, he was very strongly opposed to anything that would have a detrimental impact on our views and our sense of open space in the desert. He thought that was an endearing quality that brought many people to the desert and adds to our quality of life. The ability to just drive down the street. The thing we take for granted, when we drive down the street and we can see mountains and blue sky and not look at cement. There were a couple of projects that have occurred recently that kind of reminded him that they had to be very careful to guard this particular resource. One of them was the gallery on Highway 74 and he thought it would turn out okay, but it did have a strong impact initially and they were working on it, but it reminded him of that because it did take away some view. The other one was the building on Fred Waring that was two story, was within ordinance, but was very close to where we drive along on Fred Waring. Instead of seeing the open space, they were seeing cement. That kind of left him with mixed feelings because on the other hand he didn't want to have the view eliminated, but on the other hand the line of sight analysis to him was very persuasive because it told him that even though they have a third story, because of the setback they would actually see more of the mountains and sky. So he was a little bit torn as to which is best. One thing for sure, and they all tended to be guilty of this, was they wouldn't just have 67 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 21, 1999 an empty vacant lot there forever. Something would go there and that something would mean they weren't just looking at the trees by One Quail Place and weren't just looking at the mountains. They were going to see some form of cement. He tried to evaluate what they were getting as opposed to what they might get down the line. He thought what they were being presented with was a little bit too much, but not a whole lot off and he thought this project was right for the area for the reasons that were enumerated by the applicant, but he thought there was a little bit too much and there were certain mitigations that could take place if the applicant wanted to that might make this a livable compromise for everyone. The kinds of things that would make it livable for him would be one, a greater setback of the three story portion, which mean the elimination of some of the units. That may then still justify the project or not, he didn't know that and that was up to the applicant, but basically what he was saying was less green on the map. If the green, which represented the three story portion was to be pushed back sufficiently then they would have an even better line of sight because the three story was even further back and it also meant less units because there were less units on the third story. The two very valid concerns that resonated with him which was density and height would be accommodated by eliminating some of the third story units and pushing the third story back some amount. He didn't know where that green line should end, but thought it was part of the mitigation that could take place. That was number one. Number two, he agreed that the aesthetic features, the cupolas--the round thing above the dining area and the towers that go up to 42 feet with some 36 foot ancillary towers, he would like to find some other architectural feature that kept everything at no higher than 28 feet. He could almost be made to live with the 28 feet, but 42 feet was way too much in his opinion. Since those features were there for visual and aesthetic purposes, he thought they could be eliminated and maybe made up for in some other way that didn't exceed 28 feet. Thirdly, he would suggest additional landscaping on top of the second story so that the third story, what they were looking at when they did see the third story from wherever, was not cement but actually green stuff. They could put some trees and pots on the second story roof or have something hanging vines from the third story, but at least if he was going to look at third story, he would rather be looking at green stuff than cement. He thought if they combined all three of these, they might have a situation that accommodates from his standpoint the desire to have a project like this in that area while at the same time accommodating the needs and very legitimate concerns of the surrounding residents. He didn't know if that was doable or 68 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 21, 1999 economically feasible, but from a Planning standpoint he thought he would need to see that before he could give approval. In its present state he too could not support it, but on the other hand he would be in favor of a continuance to give the applicant an opportunity to answer some of the very legitimate concerns that have been brought up, at least to examine if it's feasible or to make a determination that no, it isn't and then go from there. He didn't know if that was in order or if he was in the minority, but that was his opinion. Commissioner Finerty stated that it was her understanding that the applicant wanted the commission to move this project forward to deal with the height issue so that they could go ahead and appeal or get it to the city council for their approval. Chairperson Jonathan said that either way, it could either be denied or even if it was approved, the continuance would give staff time to prepare the appropriate documents. He didn't see approval here tonight and saw either denial or continuance. Mr. Smith thought the question should be directed to the applicant to see if he would like a continuance to address the issues which commission raised. Mr. Sweet said their preference was not a continuance, but a denial. Commissioner Finerty said she would move to approve the findings as presented by staff. Action: It was moved by Commissioner Finerty, seconded by Commissioner Campbell, approving the findings as presented by staff. Motion carried 4-1 (Chairperson Jonathan voted no). It was moved by Commissioner Finerty, seconded by Commissioner Campbell, adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 1943, denying GPA 99-3, C/Z 99-2, PP/CUP 99-7 and DA 99-3. Motion carried 4-1 (Chairperson Jonathan voted no). Chairperson Jonathan wished the applicant luck and thanked everyone for being at the meeting at such a late hour. 69 CITY OF PALM DESERT DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission DATE: September 21 , 1999 CASE NOS: GPA 99-3, C/Z 99-2, PP/CUP 99-7 and DA 99-3 REQUEST: Approval of a general plan amendment to add senior overlay, approval of a change of zone from PR-7 (planned residential 7 units per acre) to PR-7 S.O. (planned residential senior overlay), precise plan of design/conditional use permit (including a height exception for the three (3) story portion, development agreement and a negative declaration of environmental impact as it relates to a proposed 256 unit continuing care retirement community, a community center building and a 99 bed skilled nursing facility on 13.04 acres on the west side of Fairhaven Drive between Fred Waring Drive and Parkview Drive, 72-650 Fred Waring Drive and 72-755 Parkview Drive. APPLICANT: Pearl Industries Inc. Pearl Industries Inc. 66 Alviso Drive c/o Charles Sweet Camarillo, CA 93010 43-708 Virginia Avenue Palm Desert, CA 92211 I. BACKGROUND: A. SITE DESCRIPTION: The property is an irregularly shaped site comprising 13.04 acres generally located on the west side of Fairhaven between Fred Waring Drive and Parkview Drive. The property is generally flat with a slight slope to the southeast and is lightly scattered with native vegetation. The site has never been improved. B. ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE: North: Rancho Mirage/single family residential South: PC(3)/Trader Joe's center East: R-1 and PR-7/single family residential and apartments West: PR-22 AHD/One Quail Place STAFF REPORT CASE NOS. GPA 99-3, C/Z 99-2, PP/CUP 99-7 AND DA 99-3 SEPTEMBER 21, 1999 C. SITE ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: The site is currently zoned PR-7 and is designated medium density residential 5-7 units per acre. II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project includes a 99 bed skilled nursing facility and a 250 unit (applicant reduced number of units after legal notice was mailed) continuing care retirement community which provides individual living and assisted living. The skilled nursing facility is a single story, 18 foot high structure which is located adjacent to Fred Waring Drive. This facility has access from Fred Waring Drive and connects to the rest of the project to the north through an on-site driveway system. The continuing care retirement community building(s) is a three (3) story building 28 feet in height above adjacent curb. The south wing faces toward Fairhaven Drive and the north wing faces toward Parkview Drive. These two buildings connect at the community center building (42 feet in height above curb line). All of the continuing care structure is at least two stories and 17 feet above curb in height. The three story portion (28 feet in height above curb) has been pushed back from Fairhaven and Parkview and is adjacent to the two story (22 feet in height) One Quail Place. The third story is setback from Fairhaven Drive 120 feet and is setback 1 17'/z feet from Parkview Drive. The main access to the continuing care buildings is from Parkview Drive at the east limit of the property. This access leads to surface parking, to underground parking and a valet drop off area at the community building. At the west end of the site on Parkview and at the north end of Fairhaven Drive gated, emergency vehicle only, access points will be provided. The continuing care portion of the project includes: UNIT TYPE CODE SIZE REQUIREMENT SIZE PROVIDED 154 - 1 bedroom units 500 square feet 826 sq ft and 910 sq ft 90 - 2 bedroom units 700 square feet 1 183 sq ft & 1220 sq ft 6 - 3 bedroom units N/A 1640 sq ft 250 Total Units* with 98 in the south building and 152 units in the north building 2 STAFF REPORT CASE NOS. GPA 99-3, C/Z 99-2, PP/CUP 99-7 AND DA 99-3 SEPTEMBER 21 , 1999 *Note: Applicant reduced number of total units after legal notice was mailed. While the project will provide a common dining room, all units will have their own kitchen. As well, each unit has a full bath and living area. PROJECT DATA A. SKILLED NURSING FACILITY Project Code Standard Setbacks: Front (Fred Waring) 94 feet 32 feet Sides (E/W) 60 feet/20 feet 20 feet Rear 20 feet 20 feet B. CONTINUING CARE BUILDING Setbacks: Front (Fairhaven Drive) 60' to 1 7' section 20' to 1 8' section 120' to 28' section 120' for 24' section (Parkview Drive 42' to 1 7' section 32' to 18' section 1 10' to 28' section 120' to 24' section Side (W) 48' 20' Rear 35' 20' Maximum Height Flat Roof 28 feet* * (above curb) 22 feet Maximum Coverage 34% 50% Parking* 484: 318 underground 300* * * 1 66 above ground Senior Overlay Intensity* ** * 561 persons 652 persons * Senior Overlay projects serving persons age 62 and older are required to provide a minimum of one parking space per unit. ** The PR zone and the Senior Overlay district limit maximum height to two (2) stories and 22 feet for flat roofed structures. The building section for the three stories is 33 feet; however, the applicant proposes to lower the building five feet into the ground creating a net height of 28 feet above the adjacent curb. The applicant is seeking an "exception" to the height and number of stories. 3 STAFF REPORT CASE NOS. GPA 99-3, C/Z 99-2, PP/CUP 99-7 AND DA 99-3 SEPTEMBER 21 , 1999 *** Based on one for each residential unit and one for each two beds in a skilled nursing facility. * ** * The Senior Overlay zone density is a function of the projected population of the project. Projects in excess of ten acres are permitted a maximum of 50 persons per acre with a minimum age of 62 years (13.04 acres x 50 PPA = 652 persons). This project contains a (99 bed skilled nursing facility 99 persons) + (154 one bedroom units x 1 .75 PPA = 270 persons) + (96 two and three bedroom units x 2.0 PPA = 192 persons) (99 + 270 + 192 = 561 persons). III. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT, CHANGE OF ZONE AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT: The project will require a general plan land use amendment to add senior housing, change of zone adding the senior overlay and a development agreement. The senior housing designation was designed to provide increased density and special development standards to encourage the development of various forms of senior housing. When the senior overlay was created, it was anticipated that senior projects would be requesting densities in excess of 20 units per acre. Due to the significantly lower traffic and other impacts of senior housing, the overlay allows these densities based on a population per acre land use intensity formula. The overlay also requires that senior housing projects include up to 25% affordable housing in exchange for these large density bonuses. For example Hacienda de Monterey, the first project approved under the overlay, received a density increase from R-1 10,000 (three units per acre) to 23 units per acre. Total allowable units increased from 31 to 233. This project if approved would increase the permitted number of units from 91 to 300 units. For projects in excess of 100 units the affordable housing inclusionary requirement mandates 10% moderate income units, 10% low income units and 5% very low income units. Several previous projects were high-end congregate care and assisted living projects providing a wide range of services (meals, recreation, maid service, medical care, etc.) beyond basic housing and it was difficult to determine an appropriate affordable housing cost. As a result, the City and developer of these projects have historically agreed through a development agreement to substitute an in-lieu fee which would be used by the City to subsidize senior housing. In the case 4 STAFF REPORT CASE NOS. GPA 99-3, C/Z 99-2, PP/CUP 99-7 AND DA 99-3 SEPTEMBER 21, 1999 of Portofino (Royce International Investments Co., approved in 1999) a $12,000 per required affordable unit was assessed. In this instance the applicant will be allowed to meet the affordability requirement either through a one time payment of $12,000 per affordable unit (i.e., 75 units) or by restricting 30 units for occupancy by moderate income households, 30 units by lower income households and 15 units by very low income households. Staff will further refine these provisions and prepare a draft development agreement if the project gets a go ahead on other issues. IV. STAFF CONCERNS: From the time we received this application staff has had concerns with various aspects of this project. A. ACCESS: The project initially had its main access from Fairhaven Drive. This was unacceptable given the recent history of traffic in the Palmdale Estates area. The applicant consequently revised the plan to provide access from Fred Waring Drive and Parkview Drive only. B. BUILDING HEIGHT, NUMBER OF STORIES AND MASS: The PR zone and the senior overlay limit height to two stories and 22 feet for flat roofed structures. The plan originally proposed three stories and 33 feet in height. In an effort to reduce the height impact, the applicant proposed to depress the structure five feet into the ground. The first floor would be five feet below curb height reducing the apparent building height to 28 feet. The applicant eliminated several of the third story units to help break up the roof line and lower the appearance and eliminated the third floor units closest to Fairhaven Drive and Parkview Drive (the project originally had 280 units in the residential portion versus 250 currently proposed). The basic design concept provides a linear building with wing sections extending closest to the streets. This too helps to lower its appearance. 5 STAFF REPORT CASE NOS. GPA 99-3, C/Z 99-2, PP/CUP 99-7 AND DA 99-3 SEPTEMBER 21, 1999 The project includes a series of tower elements which are included to help break up the roof line. These architectural projections are 37 feet in height except for the community center building which is 42 feet in height. Municipal Code Section 25.68.300 "B" permits tower elements which do not exceed 10% of the ground area covered by the structure to be erected not more than 25 feet above the height permitted in the base zone (i.e., 22 feet + 25 feet = 47 feet maximum tower height because the towers comprise less than 10% of the covered area). Notwithstanding all the mitigation that the applicant has designed into the project, staff cannot support an "exception" to the height of the building. The City has recently processed height exceptions in the PR zone for the Marriott timeshare at Monterey and Frank Sinatra and for The Courtyard hotel at Frank Sinatra and Cook Street. In both these instances we have many hundreds of feet of separation between existing residences and the proposed buildings. In fact, both projects were located on or adjacent to a golf course. The extensive separation became the finding to support the "exception." The exceptional separation also resulted in neighbors eventually supporting the timeshare project. In this case we do not have hundreds of feet of separation, the site is an infill situation in a developed neighborhood and the neighbors are strongly opposed (see next section of this report and letters attached). On two sides we have single story dwellings and on one side we have One Quail Place which is two story and 22 feet in height. The three story portion while it has been pushed away from the streets is located adjacent to One Quail Place and will be six feet taller. The building mass is further emphasized by its overall length (over 1350 feet in total length) when measured from south end to west end. This proposed 28-foot high structure does not warrant a height "exception." If the city is not prepared to grant the height exception, the remainder of the request becomes moot in that the applicant has advised staff that eliminating all of the third story units would make the project infeasible. If the commission feels that the three story project has merit but does not warrant an "exception" commission should direct staff to prepare an ordinance 6 STAFF REPORT CASE NOS. GPA 99-3, C/Z 99-2, PP/CUP 99-7 AND DA 99-3 SEPTEMBER 21, 1999 amendment to permit an increased maximum height limit in the PR zone. Such an amendment would apply citywide. C. LANDSCAPING AND ARCHITECTURE Staff is concerned that on the east side of the project adjacent to Fairhaven the landscape depth is inadequate to effectively screen the project. The grading plan provides 17 feet from the curb face on Fairhaven to the curb in the parking lot. In this 17 feet there will be an 8-foot sidewalk which only leaves 9 feet to plant. Along Parkview we have 47 feet less the 8-foot sidewalk. Considering that the project is over parked by about 180 spaces, it should be possible to eliminate the 29 parking spaces adjacent to Fairhaven Drive and create a significant landscape buffer. August 24, 1999, the applicant obtained a "conceptual approval" of the building architecture from the ARC with direction to improve it. The applicant revised the plans and it was returned to ARC at its September 14, 1999 meeting. At that time ARC once again was not prepared to grant preliminary approval. ARC felt that while the applicant had taken many steps to mitigate the building height, the architecture was not yet acceptable (see minutes and resolution attached). ARC ultimately concluded that the plans could be made acceptable but before the applicant spends additional funds addressing these architectural concerns the building height issue needs to be resolved. V. COMMUNITY MEETINGS In an effort to advise the neighbors of this project the applicant held a community meeting on April 24, 1999. Following the community meeting the city received 31 letters of objection. Areas of concern of the residents can be summarized as follows: A. Excessive Density (14) B. Excessive Traffic (21 ) C. Building Mass (3 story) (16) D. View Blockage (20) E. Incompatible with Neighborhood (14) F. Decrease Property Values (13) G. Noise (7) 7 STAFF REPORT CASE NOS. GPA 99-3, C/Z 99-2, PP/CUP 99-7 AND DA 99-3 SEPTEMBER 21, 1999 H. Inconvenience during construction (1 ) Noise of emergency vehicles (1 ) J. Project unneeded-others available (2) K. Access from Fairhaven Drive (5) As a result of this public input a traffic impact analysis was prepared and the project access was altered. The revised project moved the main access from Fairhaven Drive to Parkview Drive. The access to Fairhaven will be for only emergency vehicles. The traffic report concludes that the project would have "a minimum impact at the studied intersections during the peak hours." Placing the main access on Parkview Drive would add 12 vehicles per hour in the PM peak who would use Parkview to access the site. This amounts to one vehicle every five minutes. In this same PM peak hour ten vehicles are expected to exit the site or one every six minutes. The report concludes that traffic flow on Parkview will remain acceptable. Staff feels that the matter of noise, emergency vehicles and the inconvenience during construction could be addressed through appropriate conditions and existing city ordinances. These will be provided if the project can overcome other concerns. The other concerns of area residents can be grouped as follows: A. Density of 23 units per acre is incompatible with adjacent single family residential dwellings. B. The building height (28 feet above curb) and mass is incompatible with the neighborhood, will impair views and decrease property values. With respect to the density/intensity of development staff feels that a differently designed project could be acceptable (One Quail Place is 22 units per acre). In the matter of item B staff concurs that a height "exception" to permit 28 feet is not warranted. VI. CONCLUSION: The applicant is proposing a high quality residential ownership project which is a combination of independent living, assisted living and skilled nursing. The project includes 318 underground parking spaces plus surface spaces and provides 184 more 8 L"� 1 STAFF REPORT CASE NOS. GPA 99-3, C/Z 99-2, PP/CUP 99-7 AND DA 99-3 SEPTEMBER 21, 1999 spaces than code requires. The units range in size from 824 square feet to 1655 square feet. Even with these pluses the project has one fatal flaw - the building height at 28 feet exceeds the code limit. Staff scheduled this matter before the applicant had obtained the customary "preliminary" approval from ARC. We did this because even if he eventually comes up with an acceptable 28 foot high architectural plan, staff could not support an "exception" to the height limit. At the same time the applicant wanted the opportunity to argue the merits of the project before Planning Commission and City Council. The applicant also requested that we not continue the matter as this would delay the matter from getting before the City Council. Therefore, staff is providing Planning Commission with a resolution of denial due to the height of the building(s). If the Planning Commission feels that this is a desirable project which should be approved, staff requests that the Planning Commission continue the matter to a date certain and refer the matter back to staff for preparation of environmental documentation, resolutions of approval, development agreement and processing of a zoning ordinance amendment to increase the permitted building height in the Senior Overlay. Such increased building height would apply to all senior projects. VII. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Staff is recommending that the project not be approved. If that recommendation is upheld there will be no project and hence no environmental review is necessary. If the Planning Commission or City Council direct staff to prepare resolutions of approval, staff will complete all necessary environmental documentation. VIII. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends: A. Adoption of the findings. 9 STAFF REPORT CASE NOS. GPA 99-3, C/Z 99-2, PP/CUP 99-7 AND DA 99-3 SEPTEMBER 21, 1999 B. Adoption of Planning Commission Resolution No. , denying GPA 99-3, C/Z 99-2, PP/CUP 99-7 and DA 99-3. IX. ATTACHMENTS: A. Draft resolution B. Legal notice C. Comments from city departments and other agencies D. Plans and exhibits E. Letters of objection received from neighbors Prepared by ,' Steve Smith Y , I Reviewed and Approved by / I '-y Phil Drell /tm 10 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, DENYING A REQUEST BY PEARL INDUSTRIES INC. FOR APPROVAL OF A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT TO ADD SENIOR OVERLAY, CHANGE OF ZONE FROM PR-7 S.O. (PLANNED RESIDENTIAL SENIOR OVERLAY), PRECISE PLAN OF DESIGN/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (INCLUDING A HEIGHT EXCEPTION FOR THE THREE (3) STORY PORTION), A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AND A NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT AS IT RELATES TO A PROPOSED 250 UNIT CONTINUING CARE RETIREMENT COMMUNITY, A COMMUNITY CENTER BUILDING AND A 99 BED SKILLED NURSING FACILITY ON 13.04 ACRES ON THE WEST SIDE OF FAIRHAVEN DRIVE BETWEEN FRED WARING DRIVE AND PARKVIEW DRIVE, 72-650 FRED WARING DRIVE AND 72-755 PARKVIEW DRIVE. CASE NOS. GPA 99-3, C/Z 99-2, PP/CUP 99-7 AND DA 99-3 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 21st day of September, 1999, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider the request of PEARL INDUSTRIES INC. for approval of the above noted cases; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said Planning Commission did find the following facts and reasons to exist to justify denial of said request: 1 . The proposed building height exceeds that permitted in the PR zone district and the senior overlay district. 2. The building height and mass would not be compatible with the neighborhood into which the project is proposed to be located. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1 . That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the commission in this case. 2. That GPA 99-3, C/Z 99-2, PP/CUP 99-7 and DA 99-3 are hereby denied. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 21 st day of September, 1999, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: SABBY JONATHAN, Chairperson ATTEST: PHILIP DRELL, Secretary Palm Desert Planning Commission 2 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 14, 1999 MINUTES 8. CASE NO.: PP 99-7 and C/Z 9-2 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): PEARL INDUSTRIES, INC. , c/o Charlie Sweet, 43-703 Virginia Avenue, Palm Desert, CA 92211 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of revised plans for 256 senior residential units, community center and 99-bed skilled nursing facility on 13.04 acres LOCATION: West side of Fairhaven between Fred Waring and Parkview ZONE: PR-7 to be rezoned PR-7 SO (Senior Overlay) Mr. Smith reported that the Commission previously considered this project and gave conceptual, and the applicant has submitted revised plans. The key issue is the appropriateness of height and massing. Pursuant to the Code, the height limit is 22 feet. The original plans called for 33-foot sections, and to mitigate the height issue, the applicant has added articulation to the building and lowered the site by five feet so that the three- story elements will now be 28 feet above the adjacent curbs on Fairhaven and Parkview. This case is scheduled for review by the Planning Commission next Tuesday. Staff cannot support a height exception in this case, and requests that the Commission take a position on the appropriateness of the height of the building in the portions where it exceeds 22 feet. The area to the west is occupied by two-story apartments (One Quail Place), which is 22 feet in height with a flat roof. The area to the north is occupied by single-story residences ranging from 16 to 18 feet in height. The area to the east is occupied by single-story, single-family residences of approximately 16 feet in height. Chairman Gregory asked if the corner of the three-story elements have been lowered as was previously suggested, to which Mr. Sweet replied that exterior finishes and canopies have been added. The density of the project has been reduced by four residential units in order to break up the third-story roofline. The project setback exceeds the code requirements, and the site has been lowered by five feet; so as one stands at the curb, it is not possible to see the third floor because of the way the building is stepped back. 8 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 14, 1999 MINUTES Chairman Gregory noted that there is a situation on Fred Waring and Fairhaven regarding landscape screening, and asked how the applicant intends to handle that matter, to which Mr. Sweet replied that a lot of peninsula planters will be installed on the inside, and he is doing his best on the outside. Mr. Smith stated that the project is considerably over-parked for a senior assisted living facility; so it may be advisable to eliminate parking on the Fairhaven side. Mr. Sweet agreed that the facility is over-parked, and indicated that because these types of facilities typically do not have enough storage space, it may become necessary in the future to use some of the parking area for storage spaces. Chairman Gregory noted that if the configuration is changed, it would be possible to have a berm on the front, which would reduce the appearance of the building height. Mr. Smith pointed out that the neighbors' issues have focused on density and height. Commissioner Urrutia asked if the applicant has considered the possibility of reducing the building mass, to which Mr. Sweet responded affirmatively, and indicated that it is not possible to go lower due to the subterranean parking and retention basins. Judy Rogers, 43-840 Fairhaven, stated that her chief concern is the density. She has a 180-degree view from her home which will be impacted by this project. The project density will affect property values in the area, and the project will create additional noise due to traffic from waste haulers and food service personnel. She is also afraid this project will lead to the re-opening of Fairhaven. Mr. Sweet remarked that he stood in Ms. Rogers' driveway this morning and noted that one would only able to see a portion of the third story of this project, and added that the view of the mountains is blocked by Eucalyptus trees at One Quail Place Apartments. 9 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 14, 1999 MINUTES Jay Cody, the project architect, pointed out that the service road comes from Fred Waring and goes along the back of the project. Rod Murphy, a resident of Arboleta, indicated that his chief concerns are the project density and the height. Page Quilling, 72-845 Arboleta, commented that the proposed buildings look nice, but he is opposed to the density and the three-story height. Commissioner O'Donnell commented that texture has been added to the architecture, which is good, but the fabric canopies don't do it for him. He has a problem with the three-story elements because they are too high. He feels that the buildings are too horizontal. He believes there is room for this project to incorporate changes, and the architecture has been improved on the community center and the skilled nursing facility, but the architectural detail has not been extended to the residential units, which are stark in contrast to the other buildings. Commissioner Van Vliet agreed with Commissioner O'Donnell's comments and indicated that the architecture of the residential units is stark, and the fabric awnings are not a long-term solution to that problem. He believes the architecture needs additional work, and added that he also has a problem with the height. Commissioner Urrutia stated that he would not have a problem with three-, four- or even five-story buildings as long as the design is sensitive to the height. The community center is terraced back such that it doesn't give the appearance of being a three-story building, even though it is. The skilled nursing facility is also well designed. Architectural interest has been added to the residential units with a combination of flat and pitched roofs, but the three-story elements are a problem due to the massing. In order to alleviate concerns regarding the three-story elements and reduce the appearance of the height, he would suggest that they also be stepped back in the same manner as the community center; however, this will mean eliminating more of the residential units. David Morehead of Pearl Industries asked for the Commission's input on the idea of dispersing the tower elements through the residential units, to which Commissioner Urrutia replied that he is not certain that will work. 10 569 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 14, 1999 MINUTES Commissioner Urrutia stated that he is not opposed to the type of architecture being proposed, but the problem with this type of architecture is that it amplifies the three-story elements because it is more massive. Mr. Smith commented that staffs position on the height is that if the Planning Commission indicates it is a good project and it should proceed forward, then staff will suggest that it be referred back to staff for a code change to increase the 22-foot height limit in the PR zone. Chairman Gregory felt that this project is not ready for preliminary approval, although it is moving closer to that point, and the project definitely has architectural possibilities. Commissioner O'Donnell stated that the key to the height issue is having the appropriate design, but an appropriate design has not yet been developed. Commissioner Urrutia clarified that the density issue is totally separate from the architecture in this project. Mr. Murphy commented that the buildings are beautiful, but the density and height issues will influence the architecture. Action: Chairman Gregory moved, seconded by Commissioner Urrutia, to continue the case with the understanding that the architectural concerns can potentially be addressed, and likely will be, and that there is no benefit in the applicant pursuing this project further until the height issue and other Planning Commission related issues are resolved. The motion carried 4-0, with Commissioners Connor and Holden absent. 11 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION AUGUST 24, 1999 AGENDA Action: Commissioner O'Donnell moved, seconded by Commissioner Urrutia, to deny the request on the basis that the proposed architecture did not blend in shopping center architecture. The motion carried 5-0, with Commissioner Holden abstaining. 3. CASE NO.: PP 99-7 and C/Z 9-2 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): PEARL INDUSTRIES, INC. , c/o Charlie Sweet, 43-703 Virginia Avenue, Palm Desert, CA 92211 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of plans for 256 senior residential units, community center and 99-bed skilled nursing facility on 13.04 acres LOCATION: West side of Fairhaven between Fred Waring and Parkview ZONE: PR-7 to be rezoned PR-7 SO (Senior Overlay) Mr. Smith reported that the project includes a 99-bed skilled nursing facility. This single-story, 18-foot high structure is located on the portion of the site fronting Fred Waring Drive. Parking is located between Fred Waring and the building and along the east side of the building. Public Works Department advises that an eight-foot wide sidewalk will be installed along Fred Waring Drive. This will leave 10 feet available between the back of the sidewalk and the parking lot for screening (two feet of the 10 feet will essentially be unusable due to vehicle overhang.) The landscape plan shows six California Fan Palms and associated shrubs. The skilled nursing facility will be a stucco building with minimal windows and a tile roof. The rest of the project includes two residential buildings and a community center building. The north building faces Parkview while the south building faces Fairhaven. The two buildings connect at the community center building. 12 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION AUGUST 24, 1999 AGENDA The two residential buildings are a blend of two- and three-story buildings (see Sheet 6 of plans). The two-story element has been placed adjacent to the streets, while the three-story sections abut One Quail Place to the west. Parking is provided at ground level and in a subterranean parking structure. This subterranean parking frees up much of the site for open space (see landscape plan). The maximum permitted height in the PR zone is 22 feet for a two-story flat- roofed structure. The applicant has requested a zone change to permit the three-story building. The elevation plans shows the two-story buildings at 22 feet in height and the three-story building 33 feet in height. In order to mitigate the building height, the grading plan shows the first floor being lowered five feet below the adjacent curb height on Fairhaven and Parkview. This lowers the buildings to 17 feet and 28 feet above adjacent curb height. The building architecture provides a contemporary look utilizing stucco and a flat roof system. The community center building has a sloped tile roof. As of the writing of this report, staff had not had an opportunity to review the material sample board, but staff has been assured that one will be available for the Commission's review. The texture and color will be critical with a building of this size and mass. The site plan provides a building with a series of projections (units). This results in areas of substantial landscape open space followed by building sections which come to 60 feet from Fairhaven. This area is then occupied by 45 feet of asphalt, five feet of planter area east of the parking spaces and 10 feet of landscaping between the driveway and the building. Staff questions the adequacy of the landscape screening between Fairhaven and the parking lot. Staff would note that the parking lot surface is 4.5 feet below Fairhaven. 13 Jrct ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION AUGUST 24, 1999 AGENDA The north building landscaping has greater depth. The closest building is 38 feet from Parkview. There is no parking in this setback area; hence, a greater area to landscape. The Fire Marshal has requested that 20-foot wide access be provided around the west and south sides of this north building. This can be accomplished, but at the expense of landscaping. It is likely that the building will be moved north seven to eight feet (minimum setback for Parkview is 32 feet). This would free up seven to eight fee of landscaping in the south area adjacent to Quail Place. The west side yard is another matter. The grading plan shows this as a 30-foot wide area, while the landscape plan shows a 40-foot setback. Whichever it is will be reduced by a 20-foot access drive for fire purposes. This should be taken into account in the Commission's review. Staff has a major concern with the three-story aspect of this project and the height exception necessary for this project to proceed (i.e., a 28-foot high structure versus 22 feet permitted for flat-roofed structures). The three-story, 28-foot buildings will be adjacent to two-story, 22 foot buildings at Quail Place with minimum landscape setbacks. This is difficult to rationalize or justify. Staff recommends that the Architectural Review Commission review the plans for architectural and landscape adequacy. Charlie Sweet, the applicant, noted that the proposed buildings create a better line of site, and added that the project will provide more parking spaces than required by the code. Chairman Gregory asked about the slope of the property, to which Mr. Sweet replied that the natural slope is approximately one foot from northwest to southeast, and added that the three-story buildings will be 28 feet above the grade of the curb, and the proposed colors are soft earth tones. Commissioner O'Donnell commented that the proposed community center building has some architectural style, but the rest of the project architecture is very stark and lacking in style. He would be concerned about the overall building heights and mass, and would prefer that the severity of the stark buildings be softened with architectural detail. 14 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION AUGUST 24, 1999 AGENDA Mr. Sweet noted that three or four different textures will be used on the exterior; however, he does not want to spend $100,000 more on architecture, to which Commissioner O'Donnell replied that the buildings definitely need architectural detail, and Commissioner Urrutia agreed. David Morehead of Pearl Industries commented that the Commission's input is needed, which is why the architecture proposed is rather bland. Don Gittelson of Palm Desert asked why the access has been changed, to which Mr. Sweet replied that it was changed in response to objections from the neighbors. Commissioner Van Vliet emphasized that the architectural revisions should not be minor in nature, because these buildings need major architectural changes, i.e., more undulation and detail. Action: Commissioner Holden moved, seconded by Commissioner Urrutia, to grant conceptual approval. The motion carried 5-0. 4. APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): TIM BARTLETT for NEVADA BOB'S, 73- 382 Salt Cedar Street, Palm Desert, CA 92260 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of final landscape plans for retail building LOCATION: 74-111 Highway 111 (southeast corner of Highway 111 and Portola Avenue) ZONE: C-1 Mr. Bartlett presented the revised landscape plans. Action: Commissioner Holden moved, seconded by Commissioner O'Donnell to grant final approval of the landscape plans. The motion carried 4-0, with Commissioners Connor and Urrutia abstaining. 15 SITE DESCRIPTION The subject property is easily accessible from major east/west arterial roads connecting the entire Coachella Valley. Bounded by Fred Waring Drive , Parkview Drive, and Fairhaven Drive,the site is in the heart of the Palm Desert commercial district. The City of Palm Desert has long been considered to be the center of the valley, a midpoint of culture and commerce between Palm Springs and Coachella. The entrance to the project will be located on Fairhaven Drive, providing a serene and quite neighborhood for the subject. Fred Waring Drive is a high volume, major through-fare from which the project will have visibility without the associated noise and congestion. The site is large enough to accommodate the planned 274 unit for senior living as well as recreational facilities including a pool, spa, fitness room,televising lounge, and outdoor gardens. PROXIMITY TO SHOPPING, MEDICAL CARE,CULTURAL,AND SUPPORT SERVICES The property is arguably the finest senior housing site in the Coachella Valley. It is located : • a few short blocks from highway 111, the major arterial highway bisecting the valley. • across the street from the fire and paramedic station. • walking distance to the Bob Hope Cultural Center, College of The Desert, Palm Desert Civic Center, and the Civic Center Park with it's golf driving range. • across the street from a shopping center and The Towne Center Regional Shopping Mall • close to additional shopping and to the premier upscale boutique shops on El Paseo • within a five minute drive ( two and 1/2 miles) of Eisenhower Medical Center, on of the premier medical facilities with 24 hour emergency services • nearby the Joslyn Senior Center with it's attendant senior facilities, including lawn bowling, etc. • walking distance to five well known restaurants and coffee shops !� ) April 12, 1999 Re: Proposed Senior Housing Complex Dear Homeowner, Pearl Industries, Inc., the developers of the proposed PASEO VILLAGE Senior housing complex, would like to invite you to a town hall meeting on Saturday, April 24th, 1999 at the Palm Desert Board of Realtors conference room located at 44-475 Monterey Ave., Palm Desert. The meeting will commence at 2PM and will be hosted by the Commonwealth Land Title Company. Refreshments will be available. (soft drinks, coffee and snack foods) The meeting is designed to introduce all area residents to PASEO VILLAGE which is a proposed senior housing complex to be located on about 13 acres bounded by Fred Waring Dr., Parkview and Fairhaven Dr. (the vacant land east of One Quail Place). The project will provide amenities to senior residents including independent living, assisted living and a skilled nursing facility on site. The facility will be state of the art in all respects and, we believe, will be a valued and non-intrusive neighbor. Historically, senior housing facilities have proven to be excellent neighbors in that they do not adversely impact an area in any way, i.e., Hacienda De Monterey across from the Palm Desert Towne Center on Monterey Ave. and The Carlotta on Carlotta Drive in Palm Desert. Traffic to and from will be via Fred Waring and Fairhaven Drives only. Additionally, seniors are valued members of the community in that they do not impact school systems or other City services. All parking, both resident and employee, will be off street and contained within the walled complex. The meeting will include a presentation of the site plan and architectural plans as well as an explanation of the amenities for the residents of PASEO VILLAGE and answers to any questipns you may have. We look forward to seeing you on the 24th. Sincerely, Pearl Industries, Inc. (Local phone # 345-1397) Paseo Village, a Continuing Care Retirement Community; A "For Profit" Facility RECEIVED SEP 0 8 1999 Development Concept COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF PALM DESERT Today people are living longer and enjoying healthier lives after what is believed to be the "Retirement Age". The time comes when children are raised and gone from the home, when the house gets too large with too much yard to care for, and seniors begin to think of "retirement". These seniors begin to look for a setting in which to spend the balance of their lives. The amenities they seek include household care and meal preparation, tight security and a range of recreational facilities which are immediately at hand without undo travel or effort. Here their remaining lifetime can be lived out in a comfortable, friendly home-like atmosphere. There are many well known Country Clubs and established "retirement communities" such as Del Webb "Sun Cities" in the Coachella Valley, but these are designed primarily for active and healthy seniors. When the time comes that illness or injury occurs, there are many excellent nursing homes, but each of these facilities requires substantial, sometimes life-threatening, relocation and often traumatic readjustment of lifestyle and companions. All people as they age become aware of coming changes in health and ability to fully care for themselves. "The Continuing Care Retirement Community bridges the gap between active retirement and the necessity to change life style as age and physical condition dictate. Paseo Village will provide, in one community, 3 levels of living, eliminating the probability of drastic change of location. The project also provides quality living accomodations, assistance with living and, most import- antly, segregation from neighbors and friends is eliminated. The 3 types of living provided by Paseo Village are summarized as follows: Residential Living: This first level of living is in spacious dwellings of excellent quality, where many forms of recreation and entertainment are immediately at hand, and in a country club-like atmosphere. The proposed Lk facility relieves the residents of dwelling maintenance. Only very minimum interior housekeeping is required, as maid service takes care of cleaning. Linens are furnished and laundered. Full kitchens are provided in each dwelling, but the excellent onsite dining room service reduces the need to prepare meals, except as the resident desires. All utilities, except for telephone, are paid. Each dwelling has an emergency response system; 24 hour security is provided. Vehicle parking is available in the building with valet service if required. Activity programs are established and supervised. Other amenities include a library, chapel, beauty salon, barber shop, café, Arts and crafts room, gym, pools and spas, card/game rooms and conference rooms. The outdoors if fully landscaped. Assisted Living: This second level of living provided by the project provides supplementary services in any degree for those who can no longer manage in a fully independent manner, but do not require extensive services. The Assisted Living service provides any or all of the following: Daily monitoring distribution of medicine Physical therapy bedside assistance Assisted ambulance special diets Physician services other such assistance Skilled Nursing: This is the 3rd level of living at Paseo Village. In addition to the general project amenities, the following is also provided: 1) Skilled nursing under Physician's supervision 2) Gerontologist, psychologist, Neurologist & Orthopedics 3) Physical therapy 4) Rehabilitation and speech pathology services 5) Care in daily activity such as dressing, walking, bathing, eating and bathroom use. With this three- tier service available in one location, living at Paseo Village will provide full lifetime services. Description of Improvements: Paseo Village will consist of two (2) residential buildings(South Bldg. 194,784 sq. feet, North Bldg. 301,038 sq. feet), attached by the Community Center(62,480 sq. feet), recreation and service building (all two and three stories above grade; the existing grade of the land will be dropped 5' below the current curb line so that the two story structures will be 17' above existing curb and the three story structures 28' above existing curb). Adjacent to, and fronting on Fred Waring Dr., is the Assisted Living/Skilled Nursing Building(47,166 sq. feet), a 99 bed single story facility. This building is a hollow square shape, with central atrium containing a solarium, gazebo and fountain, with large landscaped areas including park benches and outdoor sunshine and recreation areas. The basement of the residential living and community center buildings contain the vehicle garage and parking area with 285 subterranean parking stalls. 199 open surface parking spaces are provided at the Community Center main entry and Skilled Nursing facility. Residential Buildings will consist of 250 dwelling units with the mix as follows: 154 one bedroom units 90 two bedroom units 6 three bedroom units These units will range in size from 824 square feet to 1655 square feet. Paseo Village residents will purchase their dwelling units for cash; the sale proceeds will retire all construction debt and the facility will then remain debt free. Each Owner/Resident will be a member of the "Master Trust" which owns the facility for the life of the resident(s). Rebate programs are available to all residents in the event they move from Paseo Village for any reason. However, in the event of any unforeseen changes in the financial markets, licensing/operation programs pertaining to Senior residential living or any other issues beyond the Owners' control, Paseo Village may be operated and function as a senior rental facility in lieu of an "ownership" facility. Additionally, both the residential portion of Paseo Village and the Skilled Nursing Facility will be owned and operated by separate legal entities. Palm Desert, CA 92260 9/7/99 Palm Desert Planning Commission, City Of Palm Desert, F?F C 4'ED 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, �' " $ �999 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Oi,4MUNITY GEVELOPW:NT DEPARTMENT • Attention : Mr Philip Drell cm OF PALM DE,ERT Dear Mr Drell, I am writing in response to legal notice case number C/Z 99-2 and PP/CUP 99-7, involving the request by Pearl Industries Inc for zoning changes for their proposed continuing care retirement community on Fairhaven Drive between Parkview Drive and Fred Waring Drive. Unfortunately I will not be available to attend the public hearing, but would like to take this opportunity to put into writing my absolute opposition to their proposed request for a height exception for a three story portion. This would severely detract from the aesthetics of the area, and have a definite negative impact on the way this district is developing. In addition, I must record in writing my extreme and vehement opposition to any thoughts whatsoever to the previous proposal to have the main entrance for the facility on Fairhaven Drive itself As a father with three young children who regularly ride bikes and walk around the neighborhood, it would not only be a dangerous proposition, but would destroy a well established residential area, and one in which many houses are currently being improved. Palm Desert is a jewel, and extreme care should be taken in considering a development of this size. Thank you for your consideration. Yours sincerely, wr Andrew C. Palmer D F Middleton PhD CID Kathleen Hudgins RN MBA - to rn rn Palm Desert CA 92260 r"- - rn September 13, 1999 Cl) City Council City of Palm Desert 73510 Fred Waring DR RECEIVE[ Palm Desert CA 92260 SEP 14 1999 Subject: Case Nos. C/Z 99-2 and PP/CUP 99-7 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CfTY OF PALM DESERT Dear Honorable Council Members: We oppose the zoning changes proposed for the construction of a three story continuing care retirement community, a community center, and a skilled nursing facility. We are in the health care profession, and we believe that the proposed construction more closely resembles a hospital, not a residential plan. We believe the construction of this hospital will result in a number of problems for those of us living nearby. 1. There will be three shift changes per day, seven days a week, 52 weeks per year. Most hospitals change shifts at about 7:00 am, 3:00 pm, and 11:00 pm. This means constant traffic through our neighborhoods as staff arrive and depart, are called in or sent home, arrive late or leave early, and so on. There is a school bus stop located at Fairhaven and Arboleda, and there almost certainly will be safety issues between children, school buses, and speeding cars. In addition, our own safety will be threatened. 2. During the day, there will be a stream of deliveries for food service, laundry and uniform service, housekeeping supplies, medical supplies, packages, furniture, equipment, and so forth. Again, this results in threatened safety to our neighborhood, as well as increased noise and air pollution. 3. A large volume of waste will require storage and disposal. As evidenced by waste storage I have observed at Trader Joe's, local restaurants, and the Casa de Monterey retirement hospital, this will be a messy operation, with an increase in rats, flies, roaches, and other vermin and vectors. These critters will propagate throughout our neighborhood, again threatening our safety and health. In addition, medical waste, such as bloody bandages, used needles, and discarded instruments, will be inappropriately disposed with other trash, becoming scattered around our neighborhood and threatening our health and safety. 4. By the nature of the population, there will be frequent emergency vehicle traffic in and out of the hospital. at all hours. This traffic will further threaten our safety and security, as well as disrupting sleep. For these reasons, we believe it would be more appropriate to locate the hospital in an industrial or commercial zone, not a residential zone. While residences built here will also cause more traffic, noise, pollution, and waste problems, they would not cause problems in the same magnitude as a hospital. Finally, the exception to permit a three story building should be rejected. Such a building would further reduce the sight lines from the properties in this area, causing a decline in property values, as well as our quality of life. We therefore urge the council to help the builder find a more appropriate location for a hospital. Respectfully submitted, MR. 8 MIZ 3. RONALD J. MAYLE RANC1-10 MIRAC,'L, CA 92270 September 10, 1999 RECERF+.rt Mr. Philip Drell, Secretary SEP 14 1999 Palm Desert Planning Commission ,pMMUNITYBEIIELUt'MENTDEPARTAfENT City of Palm Desert Cm OF PALM DESERT 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 Ref: City of Palm Desert Legal Notice Case Nos. C/Z 99-2 and PP/CUP 99-7 Dear Mr. Drell: Thank you for the opportunity to respond to the above referenced case. I am going to try to return home in time to attend the September 21st hearing, but in case I am unable to do so, I wish to submit my written comments. We are residents of The Estates at Rancho Mirage, which is located across the street from the subject property. We are very upset about this proposed development. We are very much opposed to the zoning changes that would necessary for this project to move ahead. I strongly feel it would be very unfair to the residents in our community to approve these changes. We have invested in our homes assuming that whatever construction was approved for this vacant land would be in keeping with current zoning requirements and would be compatible with the neighborhood. We certainly never dreamed that anything could be approved that would so dramatically change the number of housing units per acre that would be permitted on this property. The absolute worst part of this proposal would be the construction of a three-story building. This would totally destroy the view, which was an important factor in our decision to buy in this community. This is not to mention the increased traffic and congestion that would be generated on the surrounding streets. There would be another ramification in this matter, which I feel, could be disastrous for our community. The developer at Ridgeview Estates, immediately across the street from the subject property, has homes for sale that are to start in the $300,000 price range. I believe the proposed project would make it impossible to market these homes. This is bad news for everyone in the neighborhood, Rancho Mirage and Palm Desert alike! It simply does not seem possible that this proposed project would be in anyone's best interest, except perhaps, the developer. We hope that you will think about the residents that live in the neighborhood as you consider this project. Again, thank you for the opportunity to express our views regarding this matter that is so important to us! Sincerely, Ron and Sharron Mayle CC: Nancy Singer, Estates at Rancho Mirage Homeowners Association RECEIVED SEP 14 1999 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF PALM DESERT Palm Desert Planning Commission September 9, 1999 City of Palm Desert Philip Drell, Secretary 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, California 92260 Re: Case Nos. C/Z 99-2 and PP/CUP 99-7 Dear Mr. Drell, My wife and I own a home at 16 Vistara Drive, Rancho Mirage, CA. Although we are not residents of Palm Desert we are directly across Parkview Drive from the project proposed by Pearl Industries, Inc. We attended an informational presentation by Pearl Industries, Inc. in May of this year. We wrote to the Palm Desert Planning Commission, the Palm Desert City Council and Rancho Mirage Planning Commission expressing our opposition to this project. Our objections include the zone change to increase the unit density, the increase in traffic on Parkview Drive, the need for 24-hour staff traffic in and out of the facility. Also delivery and emergency vehicle traffic. Sirens are part of this type of"skilled nursing facility" and are not a welcome feature in a quiet residential neighborhood. Finally, a three-story building is not in keeping with a residential neighborhood and it will totally obscure the view from the North side of Parkview Drive. We respectfully request that you deny the request by Pearl Industries, Inc. Sincere) Edward A Tol rd Rancho Mirage, CA 92 70 CI'. .' OF R J IBC 0 MIL _ _GC Nr B'Frt w=r, April 27, 1999 Via Fax and Mail Ai--" , - ) c:M-19 CITY OF PALM DESERT Attn: Steve Smith, Planning Manager v `: 73510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260-2578 RE: C/Z99-2 and PP99-7 Paseo Village proposed east of One Quail Place on Parkview Drive. Dear Steve. Thank you for routing the proposed project plans to our department. We appreciate the opportunity to comment. The project is on the boundary between our jurisdictions and if not designed compatible with the neighborhood it has the potential to impact residential uses across Parkview Drive in Rancho Mirage. Such is the case with the project as proposed. The plans indicate that a zone change is necessary,presumably to allow the project to take advantage of reduced parking requirements, smaller units and higher density. We do not object to the use and these standards as Rancho Mirage has 3 similar projects currently under construction. We must object however to the proposed height. At 3 stories and 30 to 40 feet tall we believe the project is not compatible with land uses across the street in Rancho Mirage. The residential projects across the street are 3 to 5 units per acre, single story residential. The homes under construction across Parkview Drive will be in the $300,000 range. I realize that the H-shaped building provides large setbacks from Parkview, and it appears no direct vehicle access is proposed there. But the size and bulk of the project is out of scale with the surrounding community, in our opinion, and needs to be reduced in land use intensity. The need for under-building parking highlights the point that the size of the project is too large for the site. There are two story apartments to the west and one story apartments to the east. Maybe a good transition would be development that includes both one and two story elements. It is likely your department has already had such discussions with the developer. Please advise us if the project is redesigned or will be scheduled for ARC or Planning Commission. Sincerely, i ..4....42______, Randy Bynder Senior Planner A01111i3TRATiOh GOMir iUl1i T V D'JCLOPMCriT 11(1Afic€ HOUSING AUTHORITY PUBLIC LIBRARY PUBLIC WORK; Te!.(760)324-4511 Tel. (760)328-2266 Tel.(760)770-3207 Tel (760)770-3212 Tel (760)341-7323 Tel.(760)770-322,: Fax.(760)324-8830 Fax.(760)324-9851 Fax.(760)324-0528 Fax.(760)770.3261 Fax. (760)341-5213 Fax.(760)770-3261 69-825 HIGHWAY 111 /RANCHO MIRAGE,CA 92270 April 15. 1999 Mr. Philip Drell Director of Community Development ��, �� 2 v City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Drive .DE.,; '�� Palm Desert, CA 92260-2578 Dear Mr. Drell: On April 12, 1999, I was informed by letter about a proposed senior housing complex, namely Paseo Village, that would be constructed on approximately 13 acres bounded by Fred Waring, Fairhaven Drive, Parkview and the Quail One apartment complex. Let me start by indicating that I am not opposed to development or the underlying concept of this project. In fact, because I have been involved in the financial management of a major Southern California municipality for the last twelve years, I am very sensitive to the economic benefits a project of this nature brings to a City and its residents. However, as a property owner in an area directly adjacent to this proposed complex and a member of the Palma Village neighborhood, I do have many concerns related to this project as it is currently presented. TRAFFIC FLOW- As the project was explained to me, the main and only entrance to the project would be via Fairhaven Drive at San Juan. This would funnel all traffic for this proposed complex onto residential streets which were not designed for traffic flow of this nature. In fact about one year ago, numerous streets including Fairhaven Drive were barricaded to stop the excessive traffic cutting through our neighborhood trying to avoid the Monterey/Fred Waring Intersection. This project would eliminate the commendable effort made by City officials and the neighborhood committee to reach a compromise and close the streets to through traffic. This project would escalate the traffic well beyond reasonable levels. The developers of the project down play the traffic issue indicating that the vast majority of the traffic will come from service providers and employees because the residents, by and large, are not mobile because of their age. I took it upon myself to sit at the entrance of Hacienda De Monterey, another facility in Palm Desert similar but smaller than the one proposed here, and counted the number of cars entering and exiting the facility. While not very scientific, in a 30 minute time frame 57 cars exited or entered the facility. So in a normal business day, one could expect 800 to 1,000 cars and trucks traveling down Fairhaven Drive. a residential street. to enter this facility. page 2 The project is bounded by both Fred Waring and Parkview which are main arterial streets designed to handle heavy traffic activity. It seems very logical that these two streets would be used as the main entrances into this complex, not a residential street such as Fairhaven Drive. HEIGHT OF FACILITY-Upon reviewing the site plan it is very apparent that the proposed height of the complex at three stories is onerous and does not comply with past and hopefully future City requirements. To my knowledge there are only two structures in Palm Desert that have been approved at that height, the Marriot Desert Springs and the new Marriot Timeshare project. Both of these projects are located in non-residential, non-core commercial zones with very large set backs, via golf courses or green belts, to preserve the aesthetics of the surrounding area and the community. A three story structure, located 50 feet from the curb face of Fairhaven Drive does not seem consistent with past City architectural approvals. At the most a two story structure, similar to the existing facility height at Quail One with the main buildings centered on the property to provide as much set back as possible, is a reasonable alternative. To put it simply, this project would be similar to approving a three story, 300 room hotel without the normal financial (sales tax and transient occupancy tax) benefits and aesthetic enhancements ...right in the middle of a residential area. All without enough land to do it properly. AESTHETICS OF THE FACILITY- Cursory review of the site plan indicates very large and unattractive buildings with numerous parking areas. From a lay persons point of view, the site will be very high density buildings with many parking spaces underground and adjacent. The developer has indicated they plan extensive landscaping which seems difficult to understand since a high percentage of the site will be building structure and asphalt. Additionally, my understanding of the current zoning on the property allows seven living units per acre. This complex would have approximately 275 living units which triples the current zoning restrictions. PRIVACY ISSUE- With the planned traffic flow on Fairhaven Drive and the proposed building height of the complex, the value of my single family residence located on the corner of Fairhaven Drive and Arboleda will be negatively and dramatically impacted. Because of the anticipated increase in traffic and a three story facility being placed 150 to 200 feet from by residence, my family's privacy is severely compromised as well as my ability to sell this property in the future. I would think this would be true of other members of the neighborhood as well. page 3 In closing, I am not opposed to a project of this nature nor its location. The City of Palm Desert is the jewel of the Coachella Valley. Through outstanding management and creativity, the quality of life for all of its residents has been enhanced. Along with that creativity comes responsibility for land use issues. This project, in its current state with extremely high density, increased traffic in residential areas and the onerous height and design of the structures, does not blend well with the existing residential and commercial activities in the surrounding area. I do not want to let this opportunity pass without telling you how much I appreciated Steve Smith taking the time to discuss this project with me on April 14. While I do not have the need to frequent Palm Desert City Hall on a regular basis, if Steve is an example of the caliber of employee in your department, the City is in very good hands. Thank you in advance for your consideration of my issues regarding this project. Please feel free to call me if you need more information. Sincerely/ & Ju i ers Palm Desert, CA 92260 Mr. Philip Drell Director of Community Development (vlM _ 3 1999 City of Palm Desert nautdirr EEVELLIPMENT DEPARTi,i-N 1 73 -5 1 0 Fred Waring Drive CRY OF FAUA DESERT Palm Desert, CA 92260-2578 Dear Mr. Drell: On April 12, 1999, 1 was informed by letter about a proposed senior housing complex, namely Paseo Village, that would be constructed on approximately 13 acres bounded by Fred Waring, Fairhaven Drive, Parkview and the Quail One apartment complex. Let me start by indicating that I am not opposed to development or the underlying concept of this project. , I am very sensitive to the economic benefits a project of this nature brings to a City and its residents. However, as a property owner directly adjacent to this proposed complex and a member of the Palma Village neighborhood, I do have many concerns related to this project as it is currently presented. As a resident in a wheelchair this raises some concerns for me. When these streets where accessible to through traffic their was several occasion I was almost hit by cars passing through. Also, I have dogs which I take out for walks and I feel very unsafe knowing there are no sidewalks and if the barricades are removed then the high volume of traffic will resume and with that in mind I am very opposed of the opening of the barricade for through traffic. TRAFFIC FLOW- As the project was explained to me, the main and only entrance to the project would be via Fairhaven Drive at San Juan. This would funnel all traffic for this proposed complex onto residential streets which were not designed for traffic flow of this nature. In fact about one year ago, numerous streets including Fairhaven Drive were barricaded to stop the excessive traffic cutting through our neighborhood trying to avoid the Monterey/Fred Waring Intersection. This project would eliminate the commendable effort made by City officials and the neighborhood committee to reach a compromise and close the streets to through traffic. This project would escalate the traffic well beyond reasonable levels. The developers of the project down play the traffic issue indicating that the vast majority of the traffic will come from service providers and employees because the residents,by and large, are not mobile because of their age. I took it upon myself to sit at the entrance of Hacienda De Monterey, another facility in Palm Desert similar but smaller than the one proposed here, and counted the number of cars entering and exiting the facility. While not very scientific, in a 30 minute time frame 57 cars exited or entered the facility. So in a normal business day, one could expect 800 to 1,000 cars and trucks traveling down Fairhaven Drive, a residential street, to enter this facility. The project is bounded by both Fred Waring and Parkview which are main arterial streets designed to handle heavy traffic activity. It seems very logical that these two streets would be used as the main entrances into this complex,not a residential street such as Fairhaven Drive. PRIVACY ISSUE-With the planned traffic flow on Fairhaven Drive and the proposed building height of the complex, the value of my single family residence located on the w,ij1 be negatively and dramatically impacted. Because o t e anticipatedincrease m affic and a three story facility being placed 150 to 200 feet from by residence, my family's privacy is severely compromised as well as my ability to sell this property in the future. I would think this would be true of other members of the neighborhood as well. In closing, I am not opposed to a project of this nature nor its location. The City of Palm Desert is the jewel of the Coachella Valley),. Through outstanding management and creativity, the quality of life for all of its residents has been enhanced. Along with that creativity comes responsibility for land use issues. This project, in its current state with extremely high density, increased traffic in residential areas and the onerous height and design of the structures, does not blend well with the existing residential and commercial activities in the surrounding area. Thank you in advance for your consideration of my issues regarding this project. Please feel free to call me if you need more information. -, n Sincerely. . t,04. f (4,.. k-11 ` Christa&Douglas Remer Palm Desert, CA 1l • FLF.f..:Pr.ivr,r APR 2 0 1999 ,t)Pi,_.C / 'f 99 COMMUNITY CEVELOPI,17.3T DEPARTMEti 1 CITY 01.PALM DESERT I ...: (.1/V'ed..,el-L -I., 24-‘ i '•-iii,y44: ' L..- ,,,,e1c-c. 4- 1••••'` _ _ .) ;1• 4-e- l',C-: e t 4:1,71- _ /icy /i;1-1.‘");‘, t-()-6 Z-Z 4?-e- • /-46-e_ i/4.). , ) I i 1"-- 1 • /a //•' ,:e . -:',!,&_,.-th /a/e- a iy/,,ye/_170-,i e_'',/i.x.-(-e e•-- ,, 7--- _ _, -i,/Ziet i:& _ e3 t ..,.e .6! _„41/i'e- A.4/' , di.) 4-4/1.-•4d 77 C i v _.— I i.._.. . . •j•i , ;44. L., c-:,- ,_-.azz/./z _-,-, .;17 E.ev--te-•-4- ‘ Y --- , - (..,, ' • • i 1 I, - -- -; /4 d,ze , _,64-, _.--29 ie-•-2 Zc,. ie,4,,/ti-i . 4e_i - t _;46 ee.. / et-,7; (-?.24:-ii; d A 'I- ,./4/./(ieverL- i - /1- . tc'14' - 7.1-r:Ite-e- (::.ji-d1Z 1•1::- i4 1) : ._. /5. 1/'.:.--Z;.t_A2--- a / , ,; i • „. , ‘.1 - ' '. , ,.. i- ,. // /i i:.-4 (._ 4 i 1...c.‘-‘,C -"_) , , '"e.'2..-- A ,-7.‘c C i..1 i:W12e/ i L-I ,. . . 1 ii:1,44 _ e:' .Si icy ---.-7/tedifiZekft•,) \ . , ? A ll A.,...:‘,..le 1 •_, , ( • A P R 2 7 1999 vvNnw'hITY L.Citi-CYL._iI ijc"r1iilmci4l CITY OF FAIN DESERT Palm Desert Planning Commission April 26,1999 Palm Desert City Hall 73510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 To whom it may concern: We attended an informational meeting Saturday, April 24th concerning the Senior Living Apartments, Community Center and Care Facility as proposed by Pearl Industries Inc. This structure is to be located on 13 acres between Parkview and Fred Waring Drive. This is a residential neighborhood, a three-story building of this type does not belong. It would seriously restrict the view of the hills to the south of Palm Desert thus having a negative effect on the property values for the Ridgeview and Estates at Rancho Mirage Developments. Although we were told that the entrance to the facility would be on Fairhaven we're concerned that this will be changed to Parkview thus drastically increasing the traffic flow. A project of this size, 276 living units, a 99 bed care center with a staff of 25 to 30 people working three shifts does not belong in a area presently zoned for 7 living units per acre. We respectfully request you deny their request to change the zoning and build on this parcel of land. Sincerely, ),, Edward and Loreen Tolford Rancho Mirage,-CA 92270 n-i',' 0 2/ n 9JJ 4 � yT DE9h1RT 4r"" G'frir01 ?WA DESERT Palm Desert Planning Commission April 26,1999 Palm Desert City Hall 73510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 To whom it may concern: We attended an informational meeting Saturday, April 24`h concerning the Senior Living Apartments, Community Center and Care Facility as proposed by Pearl Industries Inc. This structure is to be located on 13 acres between Parkview and Fred Waring Drive. This is a residential neighborhood, a three-story building of this type does not belong. It would seriously restrict the view of the hills to the south of Palm Desert thus having a negative effect on the property values for the Ridgeview and Estates at Rancho Mirage Developments. Although we were told that the entrance to the facility would be on Fairhaven we're concerned that this will be changed to Parkview thus drastically increasing the traffic flow. A project of this size, 276 living units, a 99 bed care center with a staff of 25 to 30 people working three shifts does not belong in a area presently zoned for 7 living units per acre. We respectfully request you deny their request to change the zoning and build on this parcel of land. Sincerely, Chuck and Carol Dauterman Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 APR-21-99 WED 01 :32 PM ASAP PROCESS 7603417884 P. 01 APRIL 21 , 1999 MR. PHILIP DRELL DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PALM DESERT CITY PALM DESERT, CA. 92260 DEAR MR. DRELL, OUR FAMILY IS EXTREMELY OPPOSED TO THE SENIOR CARE FACILITY THAT PEARL INDUSTRIES IS PROPOSING ON THE RESIDENTIAL LAND BOUNED BY FAIRHAVEN, PARKVIEW, FRED WARING AND QUAIL PLACE. WE PURCHASED OUR HOME 3-99 BECAUSE OF THE MINIMAL TRAFFIC ALLOWED THROUGH THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND THE VIEW. JUST AS THE NAME IMPLYS A COMPLEX OF 300 UNITS AND THREE STORIES HIGH, IS AN INDUSTRY, AND SHOULD NOT BE IN OUR RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD. SINCF Y, LINDA HUGHES PALM DESERT, CA. 92260 151 RECEIVED - APR 2 6 1999 Pc&)4-2A- i Jir, • ;,OMMUN( rry OEPOPOi=iJ c DEP►iR7MENT 0 _ ? 3 •7 f OF PALM DESERT 67 Z,Z (Vjt.a„A.C), / f 71 72,6,0 , ,, t, j_iti-i-c �� I 6,kil Tz2 G/A) r 14/1 ,z_i-ot--(1-- (Y-rd- vt-:- d'llit, Y ` i r ' 4L__,--// d/ l 1i ' A--4.__.) 3.1 )2a____,Q_ S--i,----(-_ -) -,, ,mac,, It..�r i 4---;-,,sz:#- - -1-- , __,Lct-t,4- e_e44,_4_/2 .67_ _<y0--OLAI't-ej- ' j41 7/1-Ci: _4)---4--fOr—Q_I,C -L-4,\J ea-A-LA- )1,,C- -1(7 61,►'V„ 7.L'L - 1 - ZLZ"7-NC7k IA Ci 4---(tA--- -'4- 45) ,)/1. .}zA e__y\j2- Zi-0-'fr‘ ed--- i6L--6:Al-e_- _-t---v----a-----' z-1-1--"j4-d al *P----t w. -9, W v 7A__,,_16z_j,--)--)---- v . ie_ &t ,,--vit--1 / 1 CT j -) Svi9-.)7.-" Ct.--tit- t,-ciL__-' 4_,t,1-1.1-4s/) . .•//..2 7/9y R- ..r.:FivErt, .,_,,, • ,,,,,,_,i. r-..) 70-- g# t:4-6,4&qadiz. ( drezy> Al''k 2 7 1999 4.4UNITYLEVELOPht::AT LiFkirikiEtils crryjc*FAAiriliNT Zat. a.7-711,e ,AirlilMil-e4, awg)6 12,0d(r.L- / il A., 4 tca;fe-e-ei-/--/15?-1-667c.#_9 a1c#, • .; It ee,, . • je.4A1..-e4 C. e-e, 4 - — e_ *" ita" / l. / ,-•''.4 -42-11-&01,)--L-,1,/f)'.2- .c ,k cc_ i -72; .1./ ._e._ • ,-- ,9---c---_ -iter,‘ / 4_,eze-e____e":11ta, ,./.-t• W-- a 0. 47:tilk_k_fize_e___ i _ :•_) '.(ii -(_--"t-- -A-62.z71-e --12_,- f-- -4.1--y Z4Z-71)-C_. • 04;v1-11 ..1-/Le (-44 i - 2"/ 2-fig-, e__ Ai-et d ,ad-/q74, kY at- li'' 1 j(j-Zeei CO-/ ;:tee't-e-, V6L--- 4*-7•0 ie4--- 6: i . '. ' ›iel/e-• Ke it-fa /6--t:L" c4--ji - (‘'' W -e - /, L-‹_ , e--Atz „.,. • /_ J.A.Howick 6 Vistara Drive Rancho Mirage CA 92270 41 5 2 7 1999 Josef/ Rosli Riemhofer vvtainti NI Pt LCVv:L':c'ie,..;1 Crrnf{1u1Li: CITY Or FALM E)E;ERT Apr.25.1999 City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Dr. Palm Desert, CA 92260 - 2578 Attn.: Planing Commission and Steve Smith, Planning Manager Ref: Senior Housing and Nursing Facility-Park View Dr. and Fred Waring Dr. After long and careful consideration and assurance regarding zoning laws, we decided to make Rancho Mirage,joining Palm Desert, the place for our final retirement residence; away from big city noise and anxiety. Only to find out, after 16 months living in the Estates at Rancho Mirage, that there is planing under way to drop a colossus of a building, in the midst of residential zoning. In our opinion, this is a most inappropriate location for this type of building, given the established residential areas of both Cities. Traffic and noise are certain to increase, while highly priced views and investment values will diminish. In conclusion, we would like to register our strongest objection, and appeal to the wisdom of the Palm Desert Planing Commission, not to betray the surrounding residential communities. Sincerely - ,-Off PaineWebber Incorporated 74--10 Highwac l I I Palm Desert.CA 92260-38 760 568-18 31 800 669-1775 May 6, 1999 Palm Desert Planning Commission PaineWebber Palm Desert City Hall 73-510 Fred Waring Dr. REC,FAVF.T Palm Desert, CA. 92260 fv1NY 1 0 1999 COMM;1Nl?Y CEM^PK7.1T L [, ryry^ CITY C; i'i;f�q�i: T T .,: Dear Sirs, My wife and I would like to voice our opposition to the proposed development between Fred Waring and Park View on 13 acres directly south of our home at the Estates of Rancho Mirage. Over 30 of my neighbors joined us at a meeting held by the developer of an assisted living facility (99 units) and 276 apartments. We voiced our opposition along with many Palm Desert residents who live close by. We understand the area is zoned residential for 7 homes per acre and we would like the city to approve only that type of development. The density, height of buildings, increased traffic and adverse effect on our home values are all concerns for us as they are to the new projects next to our community. Those include Ridgeview and White Sun Estates. Thank you for your time and consideration. Since ly, ) . ; , Mr. & Mrs. Warren C. Overman Rancho Mirage, CA. 92270 CC: Steve Smith Randy Bynder Mike Karls May 3 , 1999 r=r,.=11,fFn Planning Commission '''.'j - 5 1999 City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Drive C � I1' Palm Desert, Ca . 92260 MY PALM SER7 �i�;`r�T JEoER. Dear Commissioners: I do not believe that the project proposed by Pearl Industries called Paseo Village will be compatible with the neighboring residential areas , namely Palm Dell Estates . My objections are the elevations that are proposed , the additional traffic that will be created in an already over-loaded area , the suggested re-opening of Fairhaven Drive and any over-head street or parking lot lighting. When that area is developed ,Please do not permit anything to be built with elevations higher than One Quail Place . Please do not allow over-head street and/or parking lot lighting and please do require addequate landscape "screening" for the structures . Finally, as those of you that are familiar with our neighborhood may recall , a lot of time and energy was expended by both City personel and myself and my neighbors in reaching a compromise of street closures in the neighborhood to reduce "cut-Thru" traffic. The City Council voted to PERMANENTLY close two streets- Adonis and Fairhaven Drives . Nothing has changed in our neighborhood to make us amenable to increasing the traffic again. Whatever is built on that parcel and whenever it is built, all access to the project should be from Fred Waring and/or Parkview. Thank you for your timetand please ,help us protect our neighborhood . Respectfully, sqL1-6-4-06E49 Sharon Howard 43866 Adonis Drive Palm Desert , Ca . 92260 cc; City Council Traffic Dept . to Arline &Marvin Norman R E C E RV F l Rancho Mirage, Ca.92270 N t — 6 1999 COUV N ,i1r'5.74 ncn cm ci FI�Lrn LIL3,7 April 29, 1999 Palm Desert Planning Commission 73510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 To Whom It May Concern: We purchased our home for several reasons, one being that we wished to live in a residential zoning area . We were told this would be maintained. At the present time, there is a proposal to change the 13 acre site on Parkview to a zoning allowing 276 senior units, plus an assisted living facility. As homeowners at The Estates at Rancho Mirage, we would like to express our opposition to this proposed project. This project would need 2 zoning variances, one to accommodate the increased density and resulting traffic that we would be subjected to, and another to allow for a 3 story building that would result in a loss of view and beauty that we were assured would remain as it was when we bought our home, under the current zoning laws. Please do not allow these zoning variances to disturb our peaceful existence. Sine ely, Arline and Marvin Norman cc: Steve Smith, Planning Dept.,City of Palm Desert, 73510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert,CA. 92260 cc: Randy Bynder,Planning Dept. City of Rancho Mirage, 69825 Highway 111 Rancho Mirage, Ca. 92270 cc: Mike Karls 4 Pristina Court n'1'11n 744 Danforth Terrace Sunnyvale, CA 94087 May 5, 1999 ;999 Palm Desert Planning Commission '' UN►TyCE«too Palm Desert City Hall crn,cF F L,..44;P�°^ ENT 73510 Fred Waring Drive --c1-T Palm Desert, CA 92260 Re: 3-Story High Density Complex between Fred Waring and Park View proposed by Pearle Development in Palm Desert, facing Rancho Mirage Ladies and Gentlemen: We are writing to protest the above plan. We have just purchased property at Ridgeview Development on Mesquite Ridge Lane in Rancho Mirage. To our dismay,we learned just a few days ago that Pearle Development is planning a huge, high density complex right across the street, which would not only affect our view,but decrease the value of our property. We understand this property is zoned for single-family homes at this time. Please DO NOT change this! We are moving from the Bay Area to get away from the high density and are seeking a more quiet and clean air life. Please do not let Palm Desert/Rancho Mirage become another Bay Area. There is plenty of space around Palm Springs area that could accommodate a complex such as this in an area that does not affect single-family home residents. Please take this into consideration for the good of the Palm Desert/Rancho Mirage community in that particular area. Sincerely, , , Frank and Heidi Boynton cc: Steve Smith, Planning Dept. - Palm Desert Randy Bynder Planning Dept. - Rancho Mirage John Kearney - Ridgeview Development, Rancho Mirage April 30 , 1999 CElVE1 `.r - 3 1999 Cif'v P,:i?e DESER'. Palm Desert Planning Commission 73510 Fred Waring Dr. Palm Desert , CA 92270 Dear Planning Commission : We currently live in the ESTATES AT RANCHO MIRAGE, and have since 1997 . We oppose any zoning change that would allow the construction of Senior Apartments , especially at a three story level . We don ' t deny the possible need for an assisted living facility, but why in the middle of a designated res- idential area? Currently, RIDGEVIEW ESTATES is under construction for private homes directly across the street and WHITE SUN homes is also in close proximity, and under construction . We purchased here with the knowledge the area zoning was for residential use only. We expect it to stay so. The developer knew the zoning when said property was purchased . Any attempt to change such zoning, as to gain approval to do so, vc=.'1,5 in our opinion, and many others as well , an act of deception. We urge the denial of any request for zoning redesignation. Sincerely, n1 Don & Dorothy Lillard Dick & Dixie Blanpied cc: Steve Smith Randy Bynder Mike Karl ANNA POLANSKY RANCHO MIRAGE, CA 92270 ECEA! :► 3196.. C: ,. April 29, 1999 Palm Desert Planning Commission 73510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 To The Planning Commission, The proposed zoning change on the 13 acre parcel on Parkview and Fred Waring is not needed in our neighborhood. I am an 90 year old resident of the Estates and would support additional senior housing if it was needed. But, I know it is not. Many of my friends live in these type of complexes and they have a choice of many from which to choose. The additional traffic, undesirable high rise buildings and lack of need for these facilities in our neighborhood are just some of my objections to this project. When a city adopts a General Plan and people buy their property based upon the stated intentions of the city, it is wrong to negatively change your commitment to residential zoning that is compatible to the neighborhood. I hope that you will vote "NO" on this project and any others that benefit only the pockets of the developers, rather than the community. Sincerely, Anna Polansky ``3i 90 p. EILEEN& PAUL SNYDERC er!Hy _ RANCHO MIRAGE, CA 92270 coMu m,otopl Fab, April 29, 1999 Palm Desert Planning Commission 73510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 To Planning Commission Members, There is a proposal in front of you to change the 13 acre site on Parkview to a zoning which would allow 276 senior units,plus a 99 bed assisted living facility. As a homeowner in the Estates at Rancho Mirage, directly across the street from the proposed complex, I would like to state my opposition to this project. At the present time, homes are being built in front of the Estates. These homes will range in cost from the mid$300,000. Our homes are in the high$200,000. The construction of Ridgeview and the Estates has enhanced the neighborhood,both in looks and density. We take great pride in our complex and feel that high density projects such as the one being considered for the previously mentioned parcel, are inconsistent with the traffic patterns,needs of the community and Palm Desert's general plan. The apartment complex on Parkview is home to many families with young school-age children and teenagers. Their need for uninterrupted sleep and safe playing areas would be negatively impacted by high traffic,the noise of emergency vehicles and the coming and going of the large staff and visitors that come with a project of the size being proposed. The traffic on Parkview and Fred Waring would be negatively impacted and new bottle-necks created by the increase of vehicles traveling these streets. There is sufficient senior housing and assisted living being built in our communities to meet the needs of our community. The new Eisenhower complex, the new Marriott senior complex,the new complex being built on Country Club,the Hacienda complex and those across from the Joslyn Center make up a very large number of high-density senior communities within a five mile radius of The Estates and are more than one neighborhood should be expected to absorb. Please,do not approve this application. Retain the residential zoning that we were told would be maintained. Let these developers find a neighborhood where there is greater need and appropriate zoning, rather than allowing them to profit by a change that will have a tremendous negative impact on our neighborhood. Sincerely, c ti1 t'- I , ' Lt -, -- / y�i. -7 L Eileen and Paul Snyder • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Joan and Fred Wanke r ., April 29, 1999 T - 3 ..ry i'y CiirYO F; Palm Desert Planning Commission Palm Desert City Hall 73510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 RE: 13 acre site directly across from the Estates at Rancho Mirage on Park View for proposed 276 senior apartments Dear Planning Commission: We oppose this project on the basis of the density, the traffic it would generate, the loss of views that we paid for, and the incompatibility with the neighborhood. It is our feeling that a building of this size would cut off the view we now enjoy and could cause a great deal of traffic and noise due to the type of facility being planned. Furthermore, the land is currently zoned for 7 housing units per acre, or a total of 91 for that property . . . a big difference in density between 91 houses and 276 senior apartments. Quail One Place is a 2-story building, however, it sits in a hole so it appears like a 1-story structure. A 3-story structure would be completely out of character in this neighborhood. Please take a good look around this area to see the type of structures that are in existence now and base your decision on what this will do to the home owners in this area. Sincerely, \&k Joan and Fred Wanke cc: Steve Smith, Palm Desert Planning Department Randy Bynder, Rancho Mirage Planning Department Mike Karls, President Homeowners Association Mr, er Mrs. Fred Wanke • _ - 3 1999 C E„E:r:PM:..4f f. DEF'i:ftl CITY 0; PALM,DESERT April 30, 1999 Palm Desert Planning Commission Palm Desert City Hall 73510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 RE: 13 acre site directly across from the Estates at Rancho Mirage on Park View ... 276 senior apartments proposed Dear Planning Commission: I strongly oppose this project on the basis of the density, the traffic it would generate, the loss of views that we paid for, and the incompatibility with the neighborhood. It is my feeling that a building of this size would cut off the view we now enjoy and could cause a great deal of traffic and noise due to the type of facility being planned. Quail One Place is a 2-story building, however, it sits in a hole so it appears like a 1-story structure. Please take a good look around this area to see the type of structures that are in existence now and base your decision on what this will do to the home owners in this area. I feel the presentation as it stands now is detrimental to the value of my property. Sincerely, Maryann Poi cc: Steve Smith, Palm Desert Planning Department Randy Bynder, Rancho Mirage Planning Department Mike Karls, President Homeowners Association Maryann Poi Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 93 frl fi Y - 3 1999 CCFl,4wi r April 28 1999 Palm Desert Planning Commission Palm Desert City Hall 73-510 Fred Warring Drive Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 Dear Sir: This letter is to inform you that my wife and I strongly object to the building project on Park View in Rancho Mirage by the Ridge View Construction people. This project will certainly block out the view that we paid for, will generate heavier traffic and will be incompatible with the neighborhood. Please take a serious consideration to our objection for building all these facilities. Sincerely, Rev. and Mrs. James Tavlarides F1)-CtA0,L,j l_ Ll F r/1f 61'1,1 fi Rev.&Mrs.James Tavlarides Rancho Mirage.CA.92270 3 1999 28 April 1999 Rancho Mirage, CA x,irY CITY To: Palm Desert Planning Commission Subject: Proposal for 276 Senior Apartments plus 99 bed assisted living on Parkview across the street from Estates At Rancho Mirage. The proposal does address the increasing need of such facility to accommodate the preponderant `senior population' of the valley communities. However its planned location may not be appropriate because of the interest of others: ****The cities of Palm Desert and Rancho Mirage are divided by the `thru-way' Parkview. ****The interest of the owners of the developed property in both cities. ****The interest of the single housing units under construction or development in the $300,000 plus range at"Ridgeview"and " tr IldX, fu y / The current zone designation of the present 13 acres provides for 7 housing units per acre. This designation was not only significant to me when buying at"Estates At Rancho Mirage"but was a matter of record for the evaluation of value for transaction preceding mine in adjacent areas in both cities as well as those that followed. It is a given that zoning designations may be modified for sufficient cause and community benefit. Since, my property interest is in your area of influence but under control of City of Rancho Mirage, I do not know how or if my interest will have any weight in your deliberations. In summary the planned project: IS NOT COMPATABILE TO EXISTING NEIGHBORHOOD! Will influence property value(negatively)! I'll appreciate your consideration. • HENRY AADAMS, CC: Steve Smith,PD Planning Department Randy Byndcr, RM Planning Department Mike Karts,President The Estates At Rancho Mirage Home Owners Association Don Gittelson,Prelude Development Company,PD t6. Ron and Sharron Mayle 10 Novato Terrace . Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 - 3191:9 April 27, 1999 Palm Desert Planning Commission Palm Desert City Hall 73510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 Dear Commissioners: While we do not reside in the city of Palm Desert, we have very major concerns about an issue that we think is extremely important to us in Rancho Mirage as well as our Palm Desert neighbors that are right next door. For that reason, I trust that you will give this letter your utmost consideration. We were very upset when we heard, quite by accident, about the proposed development for the 13-acre site on Parkview Drive, west of College of the Desert. We are residents of The Estates at Rancho Mirage, which is located across the street from this property. We understand that this proposal would necessitate zoning changes that would dramatically change the number of housing units per acre that would be permitted on this property. I further understand that if this proposal is approved, buildings up to three stories high could be constructed. I strongly feel it would be very unfair to the residents in our community to approve these zoning changes. We have invested in our homes assuming that whatever construction was approved for this vacant land would be in keeping with current zoning requirements and would be compatible with the neighborhood. We certainly never dreamed that anything could be built on this property that would totally destroy the view, which was an important factor in our decision to buy in this community. This is not to mention the increased traffic and congestion that would be generated on the surrounding streets. There would be another ramification in this matter, which I feel, could be disastrous for our community. The developer at Ridgeview Estates, immediately across the street from the subject property, has begun construction on homes that are to start in the $300,000 price range. I believe the proposed project would make it impossible to market these homes. This is bad news for everyone in the neighborhood, Rancho Mirage and Palm Desert alike! "I Based on what I understand about this proposed project, it simply does not seem possible that it would be in the best interest of anyone, except perhaps, the developer. We hope that you will think about the residents that live in the neighborhood as you consider this proposed project. I would like to thank you in advance for your positive consideration in this matter that is so important to us! Sincerely, e,�Zst,t tsi Ron and Sharron Mayle CC: Steve Smith, Palm Desert Planning Dept. Randy Bynder, Rancho Mirage Planning Dept. Mike Karis, Estates at R.M. Homeowners Assn. RUSSELL & IIALINA MOCH RANCHO MIRAGE, CA 92270 -aye April 28, 1999 Palm Desert Planning Commission Palm Desert City Hall 73510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 Gentlemen: Re: Proposed Parkview Drive development We are opposed to the above project for several reasons: 1. The proposed density is unbelievable! 276 apartments with one, two and three bedrooms...with an additional 99 bed assisted living facility is unconscionable. Talk about a greedy developer. 2. The noise generated by this new `community' would drastically change our current quiet neighborhood to one reminiscent of the urban environment from which we moved. 3. And the traffic!!! Per the developer, there would be 25 - 30 staff for each shift, and there would be three shifts. Their vehicles, plus daily delivery trucks, transportation for 500 - 1,000 potential residents, and ambulances on a regular basis would create a plethora of traffic. 4. The proposed height of the buildings would certainly not be in keeping with the current surroundings. Three stories - with an additional dome - would definitely impact any existing views we now have. 5. Devaluation of our property is a major consideration for us. In view of the negative impact to surrounding residents and the environment, we strongly urge you to turn down the development of this community. Please feel free to call us on this matter at any time. Thank you. Sincerely, AAA-Gell• WrzZ Russell S Moch alina A Moch Cc Steve Smith, Palm Desert Planning Department Randy Bynder, Rancho Mirage Planning Department Mike Karls, The Estates at Rancho Mirage Homeowners Association ( r,117:r'i--Fy - 3 1999 • Rancho Mirage, CA/ 02270 April 27/99 Palm Desert Planning Commission Palm Desert City Hall 73510 Fred Waring Dr . Palm Desert , CA/ 92260 Gentlemen : We bought a home in the Estates at Rancho Mirage after checking with both Rancho Mirage and Palm Desert City plans to determine what future projects would be built in this area. The 13 acre site on Park View Drive directly across from the entrance to the Estates at Rancho Mirage was zoned for seven housing units per acre. (91 total units) It has come to our attention that a developer is attempting to have the zoning changed to accommodate his proposal for a three storey ,high density senior apartment and assisted living facility on these 13 acres . This is not acceptable to those of us who have invested in homes in this area. There is currently considerable traffic on Park View because of student traffic into the college and a development housing hundreds of people would quickly require a traffic light on Park View . Homeowners who paid thousands of dollars for view lots facing south, would have their views totally blocked by any high buildings . This is simply not right and we do register our opposition to this proposed development . Sincerely , 217 Lanny & Eleanor Browne Estates at Rancho Mirage cc : Steve Smith, P .D. Planning Commission Randy Bynder, R.M. Planning Commission Mike Karls, Assn . President zoyce B. smueL 3 7999 ca one nooato teRRacE Rancho rnfRage "Y C. , Jr cal icorznta, 922 70 April 28,1999 Palm Desert Planning Commission, Palm Desert City Hall 73510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, CA, 92260 SUBJECT: OPPOSITION TO PROPOSED PASEO VILLAGE PROJECT. I am a homeowner in The Estates Of Rancho Mirage. The entrance to our subdivision is off of Parkview. I purchased my home two years ago . The quiet location and lovely views were a part of my reason for selecting this house. The proposed Paseo Village Project would destroy the lovely atmosphere we are enjoying here and would do severe damage to our property values. I understand that the property is zoned for 7 housing units per acre. I stongly object to the increased density that is proposed and object even more to the idea of three story buildings. Thank you for your attention. Sinc rely, fit, / �• • ce Samuel cc: Randy Bynder Mike Karls (OO P.c tv t, 4-28-99 3 1999 Palm Desert Planning `"CIT yof Commission: `'��=' a n.7�,4 7�.�r Att Steve Smith As a recently retired new homeowner in the Estates at Rancho Mirage, we oppose the development of 276 senior apartments on the 13 acre site located on Park View Drive. This development will increase traffic, noise, and the loss of views that we paid dearly for. We moved to Rancho Mirage for the advertised peace and quiet in a fine desert community. We have planned our retirement for years and therefore a senior, bed assisted, living facility directly across the street from our home is not acceptable. Sincerely, Mr. & Mrs. R.J. Martin Rancho Mirage, CA 1C r•a_r, 4pi i1.27, 1997 Palm Desert Planning Commission Palm Desert City Hall 73510 Fred Waring Drive ':999 Palm Desert, Ca 92260 _ C1T Dear Planning Commission: We are writing this letter to the developers proposal for the 13 acre site directly across Parkview Dr. from our entry road to The Estates at Rancho Mirage. We were unaware of the meeting Saturday morning. His proposal for 276 senior apartments of one, two, and three bedrooms plus common areas plus a 99 bed assisted living facility, with the height up to three stories. This would require a zoning change, as the land is currently zoned for 7 housing units per acre, or a total of 91 for the property. We are opposed to his project, on the basis of the density, the traffic it would generate, the loss of the views we paid for, and the incompatibility with the neighborhood. Sincerely \ , ., 3 (-N1)(:)./Ani, Robert Al Keane Jr. & Elizabeth A. Keane Rancho Mirage, Ca. 92270 cc: Steve Smith, Palm Desert Planning Department Randy Bynder, Rancho Mirage Planning Department Mike Karls, President Board of Directors, The Estates at Rancho Mirage roL F 'CF�ts qa April 27, 1999 Palm Desert Planning Commission A P! 2 9 1999 73510 Fred Waring Drive c"`"`"�r�: !' :" _,; r;;�,�;��rr Palm Desert, CA 92260 Cix C 1.;11i oE3«r Dear Commissioners: We are in opposition to the proposed Paseo Village project. We attended a community meeting called by the developer, Charley Sweet, on Saturday, April 24. We live directly across Parkview from the proposed site, yet were not notified about the meeting. Mr. Sweet did not present anything that was supported by the approximately 45 attendees at the meeting. He met with total opposition. We oppose the project for a number of reasons. First is the incompatibility with the neighborhood, both in Palm Desert and Rancho Mirage. When asked by one attendee if he would compensate the neighbors for the loss in property value that they would encounter due to his proposed development, he in essence acknowledged the loss. The senior citizen project he proposes is totally out of keeping with the single family residences and Quail apartments in the neighborhood. We oppose the project due to the significant increase in traffic that it will cause. Parkview is already used as a cut through between Highway 111 and Monterey and there are currently 85 additional homes being built that will use Parkview as their main street. The density proposed for Paseo Village will strangle the area. We oppose the zoning change that the developer will seek. The thirteen acre site is currently zoned for a maximum of 91 housing units, yet he proposes 276 apartments plus 99 units of assisted living, for a total of 375. That is over a 300% increase. And he proposes all this in three story buildings that will significantly decrease or eliminate the views that many people in this area, both in Palm Desert and Rancho Mirage, have paid dearly for. Whatever development goes on to this 13 acre parcel should not be any higher than the highest point of the One Quail apartments. Please deny this project. erely, l'eAcci7L`rl ward and an Smger Terrace, Rancho Mirage c: Steve Smith, Palm Desert Planning Department Randy Bynder, Rancho Mirage Planning Department Mike Karis, President, The Estates I83 April 26, 1999 Edward D. &Charlotte A. Quimby The Estates c; i�u iTY LEVELOP -aT D: .:+� Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 CRY Oh PALM DESERT Palm Desert Planning Commission Palm Desert City Hall 73510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 k 2 9 1999 Re: Paseo Village Palm Desert, CA GG ;:U it CEVELOGI :41 IMENT p�Fr.'s CITY Ot PALM DESERT Gentlemen: Please accept this letter as my formal expression of opposition to Paseo Village, a proposed senior living development in Palm Desert, CA. My understanding is that the current zoning allows the property to be used for 91 housing units and the proposed development will contain approximately 400 housing units. I believe that a development with the proposed density will have a negative impact on and is not compatible with the existing residential property nearby. Further, my belief was that I could rely on the existing zoning remaining in effect when I purchased my property in "The Estates of Rancho Mirage" last year. I would appreciate it if you would include me on the mailing list for all pertinent information regarding this proposed development. VeryI� ' truly� yours, Lx Edward D. Quimby Cc: Steve Smith, Planning Department ✓ City of Palm Desert 73510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 Randy Bynder, Planning Department City of Rancho Mirage 69825 Highway 111 Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 Mike Karls 4 Pristina Court Rancho Mirage, 92270 fOL Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 April 28, 1999 Fr::::```'""_A Palm Desert Planning Commission Palm Desert City Hall APR ti y , ;9 73510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 CCnii,;.Ji iT;E "�c :. : uci,.i irnei,i CITY 0r FAIli ui 3EAT Gentlepersons: As a homeowner of the Estates at Rancho Mirage, across from Park View Ave. and Marbrissa, I wish to ask that further consideration be given to the proposed senior appartment complex and assisted living facility. It certainly will impact the traffic congestion, and in my opinion is not compatible with the neighborhood. Thank you for your consideration. Sinc e y yours, r Charles E. Leeper cc to Steve Smith Randy Bynder Mike Karts Wednesday,April 28,1999 America Online:Desertcel Page: 1 r DC Rancho Mirage,CA 92270 APR 2 9 1999 �irM, !tllY CEYELOPL::fT DEPhRTMEtd'f April 29, 1999 CITY Ot PALM DESERT Palm Desert Planning Commission Palm Desert City Hall 73510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 Dear Sir or Madam: As residents of The Estates at Rancho Mirage, we are writing to express our opposition to the proposed development across the street from us on Parkview near Monterey. The proposed 3-story structure is totally incompatible with the type of single-story, single-family dwellings that are built or being built on Parkview. Not only would it ruin our view of the mountains, but would decrease the value of our property. It would also greatly increase the population density and increase traffic on Parkview. We are urging you not to approve this senior housing development nor change the zoning. We strongly favor single-family houses to be built on that property and that they be of equal to or of greater value($300,000+)than the two developments being built adjacent to us—Ridgeview and White Sun. Thank you for you attention to this matter. Please send us notice of any meetings or decisions that are made regarding this parcel of land. Sincerely, cL James F. Scheer and Joan Davidson-Scheer ! O ta Mr. & Mrs. J.B. McLachlan F .'C F I V IE D Rancho Mirage, Ca. 92270. ; 1999 April 28, 1999 CW,nU 4r cm c; L _. Mr. Stephen R. Smith, Planning Manager, City of Palm Desert, 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, Ca. 92260-2578. Dear Mr. Smith: Re: Proposed development on Park View Drive by Pearl Industries Inc. of Camarillo. We are full time residents of The Estates at Rancho Mirage community, which is located directly across the street from the proposed development. This letter is to notify you of our very strong objections to this development as currently proposed. At a meeting on Saturday, April 24th, at the Palm Desert Board of Realtors' office, Pearl Industries representatives, Mr. Sweet and Mr. Pennington gave a brief verbal overview. Also, there were various plan drawings and elevations on display showing a very large three storey structure. Our primary objections are as follows: The scope and size of the project 276 dwelling units comprised of one, two and three bedroom units and a 99 unit Care facility will have a negative environmental impact on the existing adjacent residential communities. A negative impact on our property values due to the undesirability of the population density within a residential community. The three storey structures will block the views of the residents of The Estates at Rancho Mirage. Park View Drive is already experiencing increased traffic flows due to the construction of the Ridgeview and White Sun developments now in progress. The traffic flow will become very heavy on Park View when the homeowners move into these developments. While we realise the developers have a right to build on their property, it should not be to the detriment of the residents of the existing communities. Whatever is built there should meet the current zoning density requirements for residential units to be compatible with the adjacent communities. We request your serious consideration of these objections during the planning and approval process. 1O1 Further, please advise us of any scheduled Planning Commission meetings regarding this development, so that we may participate in the decisions which will affect our community. Sincerely yours, 11%c �llzti. ,7 James B. McLachlan. Betty McLachlan. cc: Mr. Mike Karls, President, The Estates, HOA. Mr. Randal K. Bynder, Senior Planner Rancho Mirage Community Development � p� APR-28-99 09= 31 FROM=CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE ID= 7803249851 PAGE 1/1 C Y O RAMC O MI 1GC z? -,7;<„,-- AU 7/ © 2 8 1999 „vmr.;uNiTY LEVELr;?;. 41 DE'r.,Fi7ni2M' CITY Of'PALM DESERT April 27, 1999 Via Fax and Mail CITY OF PALM DESERT Attn: Steve Smith,Planning Manager 73510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260-2578 RE: C/Z99-2 and PP99-7 Paseo Village proposed east of One Quail Place on Parkview Drive. Dear Steve, Thank you for routing the proposed project plans to our department. We appreciate the opportunity to comment The project is on the boundary between our jurisdictions and if not designed compatible with the neighborhood it has the potential to impact residential uses across Parkview Drive in Rancho Mirage. Such is the case with the project as proposed The plans indicate that a zone change is necessary,presumably to allow the project to take advantage of reduced parking requirements,smaller units and higher density. We do not object to the use and these standards as Rancho Mirage has 3 similar projects currently under construction. We must object however to the proposed height. At 3 stories and 30 to 40 feet tall we believe the project is not compatible with Iand uses across the street in Rancho Mirage. The residential projects across the street are 3 to 5 units per acre, single story residential_ The homes under construction across Parkview Drive will be in the$300,000 range. I realize that the H-shaped building provides large setbacks from Parkview,and it appears no direct vehicle access is proposed there. But the size and bulk of the project is out of scale with the surrounding community, in our opinion,and needs to be reduced in land use intensity. The need for under-building parking highlights the point that the size of the project is too large for the site. There are two story apartments to the west and one story apartments to the east. Maybe a good transition would be development that includes both one and two story elements. It is likely your department has already had such discussions with the developer. Please advise us if the project is redesigned or will be scheduled for ARC or Planning Commission. Sincerely, i ...4.1%:2--,---- Randy Bader Senior Planner 4DM711STQATUTI COMMUNITY DENCLOPMertT HnanCE HOUSIT1C AUTHORITY PUBLIC URARY Tel_(760)324-4511 Tel.(760)328-2266 Tol.(760)770-3207 Tel.(760)770-3210 Tel.(760)341.7323 Tel.(760) 3224 Eax_(760)324-8830 Fax.(760)324-9851 Fax (760)324-0528 Fax (760)770-3261 Fax.(760)341-5213 Fax.(760)770-3261 �< 69-825 HIGHWAY 111 /RANCHO MIRAGE,CA 92270 rc56, RIVERSIDE COUNTY LARRY D. SMITH, SHERIFF irt,l'AVRIA, p- 4=2.1 sh 73-520 FRED WARING DRIVE • PALM DESERT, CA 92260 • (760) 836-1600 PROUDLY SERVING AS THE PALM DESERT POLICE DEPARTMENT April 15, 1999 City of Palm Desert Planning Department 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, Cal. 92260 Attention Steve Smith Re: PP 99-7 Change of Zoning Paseo Village (280 Senior Residential Units and 97 Bed Skilled Facility) Dear Mr. Smith The Sheriffs Department has no objections to the proposed change of zoning for a 280 Senior Residential Unit and 97 Bed Skilled Nursing Facility. We appreciate the opportunity to comment on the project from a law enforcement point of view. Sincerely, La p. Smith, Sheriff Dan Miller, Captain Palm Desert Station Commander 1 ``/ ESTABLISHED IN 1918 AS A PUBLIC AGENCY °ISTR%Ct " 11 1999 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT POST OFFICE BOX 1058•COACHELLA,CALIFORNIA 92236•TELEPHONE(760)ggg-k4-1,0; DIRECTORS OFFICERS TELLIS CODEKAS, PRESIDENT THOMAS E.LEVY,GENERAL MANAGER-CHIEF ENGINEER RUSSELL KITAHARA, VICE PRESIDENT BERNARDINE SUTTON,SECRETARY JOHN W. McFADDEN May 7, 1999 OWEN McCOOK,ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER JOHN P. POWELL, Jr. REDWINE AND SHERRILL,ATTORNEYS DOROTHY M. NICHOLS File: 0163.1 Department of Community Development City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, California 92260 Gentlemen: Subject: Plot Plan 99-7, Change of Zone 99-2, Portion of the Southeast Quarter of Section 18, Township 5 South, Range 6 East, San Bernardino Meridian This area is protected from regional stormwater flows by a system of channels and dikes, and may be considered safe from regional stormwater flows except in rare instances. This area is designated Zone B on Federal Flood Insurance rate maps which are in effect at this time. The district will furnish domestic water and sanitation service to this area in accordance with the current regulations of this district. These regulations provide for the payment of certain fees and charges by the subdivider and said fees and charges are subject to change. This area shall be annexed to Improvement District Nos. 54 and 80 of the district for sanitation service. The district requires laundromats and commercial establishments with laundry facilities to install a lint trap. The size of the lint trap will be determined by the Riverside County Environmental Health Department and approved by the district. Installation of the lint trap will be inspected by the district. TRUE CONSERVATION USE WATER WISELY Department of Community Development -2- May 7, 1999 City of Palm Desert Plans for grading, landscaping and irrigation systems shall be submitted to the district for review. This review is for ensuring efficient water management. If you have any questions please call Joe Cook, planning engineer, extension 292. Yours very truly, Tom Levy General Manager-Chief Engineer cc: Don Park Riverside County Department of Public Health 46-209 Oasis Street Indio, California 92201 JEC:j 1\eng\sw\may\pp99-7 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT RIVERSIDE COUNTY APR 2 8 1999 cAIIFORNIA taw—. rh C FIRE DEPARTMENT C%."4 pE tROIEcr-49r IN COOPERATION WITH TF, J� l COUNTY F CfT`!0• ` F,'.L�r!tE.ic- •'� �" CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY c Ai ''r.-. RIVERSIDk...,..;- AND FIRE PROTECTION D GLEN J.NEWMAN F FIRE CHIEF 1., RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE 210 WEST SAN JACINTO AVENUE C`� COVE FIRE MARSHAL PERRIS,CALIFORNIA 92370 70-801 HWY 111 TELEPHONE:(714)657.3183 RANCHO MIRAGE,CA 92270 (619) 346-1870 To: S7 VG SAA I Ty REF: pp yQ ,7 If circled, underlined_or noted, condition applies to project 1 . With respect to the conditions of approval regarding the above referenced plan check, the Fire Department recommends the following fire protection measures be provided in accordance with City Municipal Code, NFPA, UFC, and UBC and/or recognized Fire Protection Standards: The Fire Department is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commercial buildings per Uniform Fire Code Sec. 10 . 301C. 2. A fire flow of 1500 gpm for a 1 hour duration at 20 psi residual 0 operating pressure must be available before any combustible material is placed on the job site. le, Provide , or show there exists a water system_,capable of providing a potential gallon per minute flow of '— 3000- The actual fire flow available from any one hydrant connected to any given water main shall be 1500 GPM for two hours duration at 20 PSI residual operating pressure. 41IPThe required fire flow shall be available from a Super hydrant(s) ( 6" x 4" x 2-1/2" x 2-1/2" ) , located not less than 25' nor more than L 150' limmeNmmiliaL from any portion of the building(s) as measured along approved vehicular travelways. Hydrants installed below 3000' elevation shall be of the "wet barrel" type. 5. A combination of on-site and off-site Super fire hydrants ( 6"x4"x2- 1/2"x2-1/2" ) will be required, located not less than 25' or more than 200' single family, 165' multifamily, and 150 ' commercial from any portion of the building(s) as measured along approved vehicular travelways. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s ) in the system. iiJ (9/ Provide written certification from the appropriate water company having jurisdiction that hydrant(s) will be installed and will produce the required fire flow, or arrange field inspection by the Fire Department prior to request for final inspection. 7. Prior to the application for a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and two copies of the water system plan to the County Fire Department for review. No building permit shall be issued until the water system plan has been approved by the County Fire Chief . Upon approval , the original will be returned. One copy will be sent to the responsible inspecting authority. Plans shall conform to fire hydrant types, location and spacing, and the system shall meet the fire flow requirements. Plans shall be signed by a Registered Civil Engineer and may be signed by the local water company with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Riverside County Fire Department. " "System has been designed to provide a minimum gallon per minute flow of 1500, 2500, 3000 . " 8. The required fire flow may be adjusted at a later point in the permit process to reflect changes in design, construction type, area separations, or built-in fire protection measures such as a fully fire sprinklered building. 9. Please be advised the proposed project may not be feasible since the existing water mains will not meet the required fire flows. Please check with the water company prior to obtaining an approval from the Planning or Building Department. 10. Comply with Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations, adopted January 1 , 1990 , for all occupancies. Install a complete fire sprinkler system per NFPA 13 . The post indicator valve and fire department connection shall be located to the front, not less than 25' from the building and within 50' of an approved hydrant. This applies to all buildings with 3000 square feet or more building area as measured by the building footprint, including overhangs which are sprinklered per NFPA 13 . The building area of additional floors is added in for a cumulative total . Exempted are one and two family dwellings. aV2. Install a fire alarm (water flow) as required by the Uniform Building Code 3803 for sprinkler system. Install tamper alarms on all supply and control valves for sprinkler systems. � (y E .)4. Certain designated areas will be required to be maintained as fire lanes vv and shall be clearly marked by painting and/or signs approved by the Fire Marshal . C:0 pi. Install a fire alarm as required by the Uniform Building Code and/or Uniform Fire Code. Minimum requirement is UL central station monitoring of sprinkler system per NFPA 71 and 72. Alarm plans are required for all UL central station monitored systems, systems where any interior devices are required or used. (U.F.C. 14-103(a) ) 01A. Install portable fire extinguishers per NFPA, Pamphlet #10, but not less than 2A10BC in rating. Fire extinguishers must not be over 75' walking distance. In addition to the above, a 40BC fire extinguisher is required for commercial kitchens. I . Install a Hood/Duct automatic fire extinguishing system if operating a commercial kitchen including, but not limited to, deep fryers, grills, charbroilers or other appliances which produce grease laden vapors or smoke. NFPA 96 , 17, 17a. 17. Install a dust collecting system as per the Uniform Building Code, Section 910a and Uniform Fire Code Section 76 . 102 , if conducting an operation that produces airborne particles. A carpenter or woodworking shop is considered one of several industrial processes requiring dust collection. @ )iff. All buildings shall be accessible by an all-weather roadway extending to within 150 ' of all portions of the exterior walls of the first story. - - - - - - -- - -_"'"".L g9 11W•L-a - -...---._--. - - - ----...�....a mo���' +-}, ,A o�� Dead-end roads in excess of 150' shall be provided w th a minimum 45' radius turn-around ( 55' in industrial developments) . Fountains or garden islands placed in the middle of these turn-arounds shall not exceed a 5' radius or 10' diameter. City standards may be more restrictive. 19. The minimum width of interior driveways for multi-family or apartment complexes shall be: a. 24 feet wide when serving less than 100 units, no parallel parking, carports or garages allowed on one side only. b. 28 feet wide when serving between 100 and 300 units; carports or garages allowed on both sides, no parallel parking. c. 32 feet wide when serving over 300 units or when parallel parking is allowed on one side. d. 36 feet wide when parallel parking is allowed on both sides. IX. Whenever access into private property is controlled through use of gates, barriers, guard houses or similar means, provision shall be made to facilitate access by emergency vehicles in a manner approved by the Fire Department. All controlled access devices that are power operated shall have a Knox Box over-ride system capable of opening the gate when activated by a special key located in emergency vehicles. - - - - - . - - - - +.,. , ... Vas a__..ref All controlled access devices that are not power operated shall also be approved by the Fire Department. Minimum opening width shall be 16' with a minimum vertical clearance of 13'6" . 21. A dead end single access over 500' in length will require a secondary access, sprinklers or other mitigative measure approved by the Fire Marshal. Under no circumstances shall a single dead end access over 1300 feet be accepted. 22. A second access is required. This can be accomplished by two main access points from main roadway or an emergency gated access into an adjoining development. 23. Contact the Fire Department for a final inspection prior to occupancy. This project may require licensing and/or review by State agencies. Applicant should prepare a letter of intent detailing the proposed usage to facilitate case review. Contact should be made with the Office of the State Fire Marshal (818-960-6441 ) for an opinion and a classification of occupancy type. This information and a copy of the letter of intent should be submitted to the Fire Department so that proper requirements may be specified during the review process. Typically this applies to educational , day care, institutional , health care, etc. 25. All new residences/dwellings are required to have illuminated residential addresses meeting both City and Fire Department approval . Shake shingle roofs are no longer permitted in the Cities of Indian Wells , Rancho Mirage or Palm Desert. 6)". Commercial buildings shall have illuminated addresses of a size approved by the city. ric yi. All fire sprinkler systems , fixed fire suppression systems and alarm plans must be submitted separately for approval prior to construction. Subcontractors should contact the Fire Marshal's office for submittal requirements. 020 . Conditions subject to change with adoption of new codes , ordinances , laws , or when building permits are not obtained within twelve months . All questions regarding the meaning of these conditions should be referred to the Fire Department, Coves Fire Marshal , at Phone ( 619 ) 346-1870 or the Fire Marshal 's office at 70-801 Highway 111 (Rancho Mirage Fire Station) , Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 . OTHER: f� F,tk SPKtivIlL t'K SIST-Ck1 M45 IevcLv CUSS I S i 71KDPik's PtV a.Wci 11 V' C9 — < L. C. 1' (10 Sincerely, MIKE HARRIS Chief by MIKE MC CONNELL Coves Fire Marshal bbm STAFF REPORT ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION AUGUST 24, 1999 CASE NO.: PP 99-7 and C/Z 9-2 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): PEARL INDUSTRIES, INC. , c/o Charlie Sweet, 43-703 Virginia Avenue, Palm Desert, CA 92211 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of plans for 256 senior residential units, community center and 99-bed skilled nursing facility on 13.04 acres. LOCATION: West side of Fairhaven between Fred Waring and Parkview ZONE: PR-7 to be rezoned PR-7 SO (Senior Overlay) DISCUSSION: The project includes a 99-bed skilled nursing facility. This single-story, 18-foot high structure is located on the portion of the site fronting Fred Waring Drive. Parking is located between Fred Waring and the building and along the east side of the building. Public Works Department advises that an eight-foot wide sidewalk will be installed along Fred Waring Drive. This will leave 10 feet available between the back of the sidewalk and the parking lot for screening (two feet of the 10 feet will essentially be unusable due to vehicle overhang.) The landscape plan shows six California Fan Palms and associated shrubs. The skilled nursing facility will be a stucco building with minimal windows and a tile roof. The rest of the project includes two residential buildings and a community center building. The north building faces Parkview while the south building faces Fairhaven. The two buildings connect at the community center building. The two residential buildings are a blend of two- and three-story buildings (see Sheet 6 of plans). The two-story element has been placed adjacent to the streets, while the three- story sections abut One Quail Place to the west. Parking is provided at ground level and in a subterranean parking structure. This subterranean parking frees up much of the site for open space (see landscape plan). 1 1) ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION AUGUST 24, 1999 CASE NO: PP 99-7 The maximum permitted height in the PR zone is 22 feet for a two-story flat-roofed structure. The applicant has requested a zone change to permit the three-story building. The elevation plans shows the two-story buildings at 22 feet in height and the three-story building 33 feet in height. In order to mitigate the building height, the grading plan shows the first floor being lowered five feet below the adjacent curb height on Fairhaven and Parkview. This lowers the buildings to 17 feet and 28 feet above adjacent curb height. The building architecture provides a contemporary look utilizing stucco and a flat roof system. The community center building has a sloped tile roof. As of the writing of this report, staff had not had an opportunity to review the material sample board, but staff has been assured that one will be available for the Commission's review. The texture and color will be critical with a building of this size and mass. The site plan provides a building with a series of projections (units). This results in areas of substantial landscape open space followed by building sections which come to 60 feet from Fairhaven. This area is then occupied by 45 feet of asphalt, five feet of planter area east of the parking spaces and 10 feet of landscaping between the driveway and the building. Staff questions the adequacy of the landscape screening between Fairhaven and the parking lot. Staff would note that the parking lot surface is 4.5 feet below Fairhaven. The north building landscaping has greater depth. The closest building is 38 feet from Parkview. There is no parking in this setback area; hence, a greater area to landscape. The Fire Marshal has requested that 20-foot wide access be provided around the west and south sides of this north building. This can be accomplished, but at the expense of landscaping. It is likely that the building will be moved north seven to eight feet (minimum setback for Parkview is 32 feet). This would free up seven to eight fee of landscaping in the south area adjacent to Quail Place. The west side yard is another matter. The grading plan shows this as a 30-foot wide area, while the landscape plan shows a 40-foot setback. Whichever it is will be reduced by a 20-foot access drive for fire purposes. This should be taken into account in the Commission's review. CONCLUSION: Staff has a major concern with the three-story aspect of this project and the height exception necessary for this project to proceed (i.e., a 28-foot high structure versus 22 feet permitted for flat-roofed structures). The three-story, 28-foot buildings will be adjacent to two-story, 22 foot buildings at Quail Place with minimum landscape setbacks. This is difficult to rationalize or justify. 2 IIat ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION AUGUST 24, 1999 CASE NO: PP 99-7 RECOMMENDATION: That the Architectural Review Commission review the plans for architectural and landscape adequacy. wp\sr\pp99-7.arc 3 INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Department of Community Development/Planning Attention: Steve Smith FROM: Richard J. Folkers, Asst. City Manager/Public Works Director SUBJECT: P.P. 99-07, C/Z 99-02; PEARL INDUSTRIES INC. /CHARLES SWEET DATE: September 3, 1999 The following should be considered conditions of approval for the above-referenced project: (1) Drainage fees in accordance with Palm Desert Municipal Code Section 26.49 and Ordinance No. 653 shall be paid prior to issuance of any permits associated with this project. (2) Drainage facilities shall be provided in accordance with Section 26.49 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code and the Master Drainage Plan. Drainage facility construction required for this project shall be contingent upon a drainage study prepared by a registered civil engineer that is reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works prior to start of construction. (3) Signalization fees, in accordance with City of Palm Desert Resolution Nos. 79-17 and 79-55, shall be paid prior to issuance of any permits associated with this project. (4) The project shall be subject to Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fees (TUMF). Payment of said fees shall be at the time of building permit issuance. (5) A complete preliminary soils investigation, conducted by a registered soils engineer, shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Department of Public Works prior to the issuance of a grading permit. (6) Applicant shall comply with the provisions of Municipal Code Section 24.08, Transportation Demand Management. (7) Any and all offsite improvements shall be preceded by the approval of plans and the issuance of valid encroachment permits by the Department of Public Works. (8) As required under Palm Desert Municipal Code Section 26.28, and in accordance with Sections 26.40 and 26.44, complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted to the Director of Public Works for checking and approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. Offsite improvement plans to be approved by the Public Works Department and a surety posted to guarantee the installation of required offsite improvements prior to permit issuance. (9) All public and private improvements shall be inspected by the Department of Public Works and a standard inspection fee shall be paid prior to issuance of any permits associated with this project. (10) Landscape installation on the property frontages shall be water efficient in nature and maintenance shall be provided by the property owner. (11) Applicant shall comply with the provisions of Municipal Code Section 24.12, Fugitive Dust Control and Section 24.20 Stormwater Management and Discharge Control. (12) The location and permitted movements of all project entry points shall be subject to the review and approval of the Director of Public Works and shall include right turn only ingress/egress for the Fred Waring Drive access points and full access for the Parkview Drive access points. The proposed Fairhaven Drive access points shall be limited to emergency use only. (13) In accordance with Palm Desert Municipal Code Section 26.44, complete grading plans/site improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted to the Director of Public Works for checking and approval prior to issuance of any permits. In addition to all standard engineering design parameters, the plan shall address appropriate circulation-related issues. (14 Proposed building pad elevations are subject to review and modification in accordance with Chapter 27 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code. (15) Prior to start of construction, the applicant shall submit a Waiver of Parcel Map application for lot line adjustment. (16) As required under the Palm Desert Code, all existing overhead utilities shall be converted to underground in accordance with the respective utility company recommendation. (17) Prior to start of construction, the applicant shall submit satisfactory evidence to the Director of Public Works of intended compliance with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination (NPDES) General Permit (Permit # CAS000002) for storm water discharges associated with construction activity. (18) All traffic impact mitigation measures identified in the project Traffic Impact Study prepared by Robert Bein, William Frost and Associates and approved by the city shall be considered conditions of approval for the project. R CHARD J. FOLKERS,'P.E. (pplans\pp9907.cnd) 4., /� ©12� o 'E_CD Dee ' `, ��-y'• 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE(619)346-0611 RENOTICE CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE CASE NOS. GPA 99-3, C/Z 99-2, PP/CUP 99-7 AND DA 99-3 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by PEARL INDUSTRIES, INC., for approval of a general plan amendment to add senior overlay, change of zone from PR-7 (planned residential 7 units per acre) to PR-7 S.O. (planned residential senior overlay), precise plan of design/conditional use permit (including a height exception for the three (3) story portion), a development agreement and a negative declaration of environmental impact as it relates to a proposed 256 unit continuing care retirement community, a community center building and a 99 bed skilled nursing facility on 13.04 acres on the west side of Fairhaven Drive between Fred Waring Drive and Parkview Drive, 72-650 Fred Waring Drive and 72-755 Parkview Drive. . -,,A 1 . i ] // i--,:-A .1 I ! ! ' • • '• ' ' ' • ' • —1 6 /di -T�� ,_.- ; 1 (:nl LF(; ... , __ _ _ . . , . ..,..:2222__ . .,, c 1 I J , �- ,� _ li 1--) r i P�� • 0,p. $Ij alm,�.•� P. VI.P.R. 11% , P •X.-(3) W*a�n. P.R.-22 \ ai mll L UlS.P. - AHD \ ' �ieie cc_, = '. *,i limo- tilu.. `J--, 1 -t \ rRt.% RARING CRIVE I r- ilt—r I A7 W ell. Subject Property ` '- , ram.ki IIIIIIIIII:�IJ! 7111,=Na,� P.C.-(3) IIlII!1I111II�I �II gyp/ _�� < IIIIIII1fiMAI �)` �� S.P. P::::,.. IIIIIriniM1 Will= ®�•� U Sp..� 4 :IMINIMU N11 • ♦ ! : � a -IIIIIIIIIIIIMIt "0 e." 4 ``� P.C.-(3) t'"'"` �' -- o( flUUuIuUU1lUIlUIiU • SAID public hearing will be held on Tuesday, September 21,1999, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber at the Palm Desert Civic Center, 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. Written comments concerning all items covered by this public hearing notice shall be accepted up to the date of the hearing. Information concerning the proposed project and/or negative declaration is available for review in the Department of Community Development at the above address between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. If you challenge the proposed actions in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission at, or prior to, the public hearing. PUBLISH: Desert Sun PHILIP DRELL, Secretary September 11, 1999 Palm Desert Planning Commission 1 )-t-k OdI/sd > $ C(k2 $ . e5 F �. Ste' CNN CCDO° sue' 010- ooj. RECEIVED S E P 16 1999 ;OMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT / CITY OF PALM DESERT yoevt.7%- �/„0"----. ,4, ,b,./..), , , d.,,,,,, fL/ J .f: '("4".."/1 copi''r :of re . , .)",„ - ,A(., , , . . 4._ ,/1 sgfi.' .4(b . .,/ 277 . ,z-ii.i if '14" Gvd , _ iva.,eg i , i Oter Joe H. Weible r7l'' ‘: i000l US Highway 74 /r l�Palm Desert,CA 92280-8225 4 : -; cctievl�ae - CI11Z�o L i llq9 ..�`. 5t , du-L(0w, �e L & r - , 1 ww5-ear Pr%co VJ LLA GC `to a_ PAM t Atiltdt4s. Z be4 Cf,J - Prf'J ea- w, b2 �� 4 a �a,�(s�' as yet 8w► 6:75 aAA-01 �t ts' r p&avu .02gsic,r. pasED viu-me m , ; ��/5 �,t�jYY1 J / i . I 6-4fild:14(4A- / , CHARLES MOFFETT AND BOBBIE HART WE HAVE SEEN THE PASEO VILLAGE PROJECT AND REQUEST YOU APPROVE THE PROJECT SEPT. 21, 1999. RECEIVED C SEP 21 1999 GG+MMUNIT1 DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CRY OF PALM DESERT Thursday,September 16,1999 America Online:BNSHart Page: 1 DESERT CARPET AND TILE 73-241 Highway 111 3E Palm Desert CA 92260 (760) S68-4109 „w...-- RECEWED SEP 21 1999 9/17/99 L,oMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF PALM DESERT Re: PASEO VILLAGE, a proposed continuing care retirement center Dear City Council: I am a Palm Desert resident and business owner and am familiar with the 3- story planned project at Fred Waring Drive and Fairhaven Drive. I understand the proposed height will exceed to some degree the current limits, but I think the project is well planned, much needed. I know there is some concern from neighbors to the North in rancho Mirage, but from the plans I have seen this project does not block any significant views and actually is less obstructed of views than if the building was constructed to current height limits. I also understand this project will generate no level of traffic that will cause problems on Fairhaven. With our aging population we need this project in our City. Please approve it as proposed. Thank You. c Diane Ausilio, Owner r o C) rri co 0 rrl BettyC o Z n. urnerman *1 1 � ,Q mac .� Zo y"��v3/4.Q 9--)Edee, \pa421-49 se.)-t-gar zL wJ 6;_a_w_11 Zke— r-44•A; • " A--.€44j1 tkoteil 'u4 �J jC.Q/� � 4l-r` Betty C. Zimmerman REC IVED -�` SEP 2 01999 t:OMMJNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 'Lf‘e'e;e41: —' CITY OF PALM DESERT RECEIVED SEP 171999 September 15, 1999 GOMMUN CR DEVE Y OF LOPPMPALM NT DRT EPARTMENT Mr. Philip Drell Director of Community Development City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260-2578 Dear Mr. Drell: Last week I was informed by my parents that a senior housing complex would be constructed on about 13 acres in the adjacent lot to our neighborhood. I am not opposed to this type of development, my family and I feel that a structure of this magnitude could develop some problems for the home owners of the Palm Village neighborhood. The height of the facility we believe is too height to be placed in the middle of a residential area. In Palm Desert the only buildings with multiple floors are hotels and they are not that close to a residential area. We do not want to walk outside our home and have to view the backside of a three story building. This also brings up the issue of privacy. This facility will increase the traffic flow and our family's privacy will become compromised. I know the city works well with the community and it will find a way to best address the concerns of its residents. I want to thank you in advance for considering my families issues concerning this project. Sincerely, Vy(A,lAbA--"OZ-/) Monica Lopez Palm Desert, CA 92260 l�` RECE1V E® SEp 17 '999 THE ESTATES AT RANCHO MIRAGE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION comma IT(6E�lELOPIA pESEFit t{T ern GRY QF PAt]A September 10, 1999 Dear Homeowners: Many of you have received a notice from the City of Palm Desert about a public hearing on the proposed senior living center for the vacant land across Parkview from our entrance. The hearing is scheduled for September 21, 1999, and we encourage as many homeowners as would like to attend to do so as a show of support for our concerns. We, as your Board of Directors, are planning to make a precentation to the Palm Desert Planning Commission on our concerns regarding this project. We encourage each of you to provide your input to Mike Karls or Nancy Singer before the meeting, but we respectfully request that you not plan to speak at the meeting so that we can present unified comments to the Commission. We need to be reminded that we are not residents of that city, and as such do not have the standing before the commissioners that Palm Desert residents have. We have reviewed the detailed plans that the developer has submitted so far to the Palm Desert Planning Department and have discussed with the assigned city planner the additional information that has been requested but not yet provided. The developer has plans for 250 senior apartments and a 99 bed assisted living facility on the 13.04 acres. The city considers each apartment to be a living unit and each two beds in the assisted facility to be a living unit, for a total of 300 units, a density of 23 per acre. There are also plans for fairly extensive landscaping, two community pools, a community center with a dining room, and parking for 484 cars of which about two-thirds would be underground. The driveway entrance to the apartments would be on Parkview, approximately across from our fire road at the east end;the driveway entrance to the assisted living facility would be on Fred Waring. The buildings would be two and three stories, with the portions facing Parkview at 17 feet above curb level and two stories tall. Back in April,when we first became aware of this project,twenty-seven of you sent letters to the City of Palm Desert setting out our concerns. Additional letters are not needed. We will address the Commission on our concerns with the traffic that will be generated on Parkview,the safety hazard for seniors with this level of traffic,the height of the buildings,the density of residents, and the incompatibility with the neighborhood. We will not speak about property values, because senior apartments are certainly preferable to low income apartments,to unrestricted apartments in general, and to commercial development. Should you wish to discuss additional issues, please call Mike (836-9483) or Nancy(341-6066). Sincerely, Your Board of Directors R.F. SWEET & ASSOCIATES Real Estate Appraisers Commercial -Industrial -Residential-Agricultural - Eminent Domain -Business Appraisals Serving the Coachella Valley Since 1970 RECEIVED 9/9/99 SEP 17 1999 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF PALM DESERT City Council Members CITY OF PALM DESERT 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert Ca 92260 Re: Paseo Village, a Proposed Continuing Care Retirement Community Located at Fred Waring Drive and Fairhaven Dear City Council Members: My company is familiar with the proposed project currently under your consideration. I understand the project will be a 3-story senior residential facility with a detached single story skilled nursing facility. I also understand the building will be a maximum of 31 fete high and the developer has submitted a grading plan to site the building pads 5 feet below street grade. I think this is consistent with our City's intent to keep building heights within reason and to avoid blocking certain views. I also understand that any new project on this site will increase traffic, as does all new development, but that the impact on traffic will not be significant and not impose a substantial burden on the neighborhood as the street is planned and built for much more traffic than this project would bring. What better use of that parcel than for our increasing senior population....of which I a few years from now will be a part! PLEASE APPROVE THIS PROJECT AS SUBMITTED BY THE DEVELOPER. Respectfully, Rose Sweet, Business Owner and Resident /s 73-241 Highway 111 Suite 3D Palm Desert, CA 92260 (760)346-9401 Telephone (760) 340-9430 Fax RECEIVED Mr. Jack Garner SEP 1 7 1999 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Palm Desert CA 92211 CITY OF PALM DESERT 9/9/99 9/9/99 City Council Members CITY OF PALM DESERT 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert Ca 92260 Re: Paseo Village, a Proposed Continuing Care Retirement Community Located at Fred Waring Drive and Fairhaven Dear City Council Members: I am familiar with the proposed project currently under your consideration. I understand the project will be a 3-story senior residential facility with a detached single story skilled nursing facility. I also understand the building will be a maximum of 31 fete high and the developer has submitted a grading plan to site the building pads 5 feet below street grade. I think this is consistent with our City's intent to keep building heights within reason and to avoid blocking certain views. I also understand that any new project on this site will increase traffic, as does all new development, but that the impact on traffic will not be significant and not impose a substantial burden on the neighborhood as the street is planned and built for much more traffic than this project would bring. What better use of that parcel than for our increasing senior population....of which I am a part! PLEASE APPROVE THIS PROJECT AS SUBMITTED BY THE DEVELOPER. Respectfully, Jack Garner, Resident /rs 9-20-1999 3=27PM FROM P_ 2 ERIN K. GALLAGHER RECEIVED Palm Desert, CA 92260 SEP 2 1 1999 COMMUNITY 1 EVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CfTY OF PALM DESERT September 20, 1999 Via Facsimile 760/341-7098 Mr. Steve Smith Planning Commission City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 In re: City of Palm Desert -Legal Notice Case Nos. GPA 9903, C/Z 99-2,PP/CUP 99-7 and DA 99-3 Dear Mr. Smith: Please allow this correspondence to serve as my written opposition to the request of Pearl Industries, Inc., for approval of a general plan amendment to add senior overlay, change of zone from PR-7 (planned residential 7 units per acre)to PR-7 S.O. (planned residential senior overlay),precise plan of design/conditional use permit(including a height except for the three(3) story portion), a development agreement and a negative declaration of environmental impact as it relates to the proposed 256 unit continuing care retirement community, a community center building and a 99 bed skilled nursing facility on 13.04 acres on the west side of Fairhaven Drive between Fred Waring Drive and Park View Drive. I apologize for not being able to attend this public hearing in person,but would like to offer the following in lieu of my presence at tomorrow night's hearing. Please be aware that I vehemently oppose such a project as this nursing home in my neighborhood. The reasons for my strong and vocal opposition are due to the effects which this particular project and height exception would have upon me and upon my fellow neighbors living in the Palm Dell Estates area of the City of Palm Desert. If this project is approved with its change of planned residential zone and amended height restriction, our neighborhood and way of life would be forever changed,probably destroyed,by the social, environmental and economical impact this project would bring to our neighborhood. 15282.1 15C 9-20-1999 3:27PM FROM P_ 3 The negative ramifications of this project are too numerous and staggering to ignore. The first issue is the change of planned residential zoning from its current PR-7 to PR-7 S.O. This change would amount to the equivalent of having the 13.04 acre location provide housing for a total of 355 residents, or at least 27 residents per acre. What the request fails to acknowledge or take into consideration is the additional amount of necessary on-site medical staff,the required round-the-clock nursing staff, clerical staff, support staff, maintenance staff and patient visitors who would be in constant attendance at this facility. To say that this project would house only 355 assisted care residents is ludicrous and a blatant attempt to show a lower resident ratio than what would factually be attributed to this project. It would be feasible to add at least 100 or more individuals to the total number of residents at this facility. The traffic and activity surrounding this facility would be much more than the normal activity per resident in a purely residential area. The increased vehicular traffic which will be caused has not been adequately stated or determined. This project fails to supply the Planning Commission or the adjoining residents of the City of Palm Desert with the necessary traffic impact report that would account for visitor traffic, employee traffic, emergency vehicle traffic,waste management traffic and the supply vendors who would be using only our single lane residential street. The residents of our neighborhood fought long and hard to recover our streets from constant pass through traffic at the congested intersection from Monterey Avenue and Fred Waring Drive. We have limited access for a reason,we all want our neighborhood to remain safe for our children and free of crime and vehicular traffic that does not belong in our area. Another traffic issue which should be seriously considered is the limited ingress and egress this facility would have due to its location. Fairhaven Drive is a small residential street with only one street to act as its main traffic supplier. The continual flow of traffic from this facility pouring out onto Fairhaven Drive and Park View would be non-stop, 24 hours a day. The route for emergency vehicles to utilize in a life threatening emergency would be circumspect and ill-planned at best due to the distance an emergency vehicle would have to go to transport an assisted care resident suffering a potentially life-threatening stroke, heart attack or seizure. The first seven minutes of response time is all it takes to either save or sacrifice a patient's life. This facility is nowhere near capable of supporting this response. The City of Palm Desert has one fire station location at Town Centre Drive, with one emergency vehicle available to answer calls. Does this facility plan to keep an emergency vehicle and driver on staff to preclude our closest fire station emergency vehicle from being busy all the time and unable to answer calls of our nearby residents? -2- 1 s2$2.1 3f4 9-20-1999 3:28PM FROM P_ 4 A new facility named Wellington Place is built and currently being readied for occupation with the same purpose of assisted care living that this proposed facility is attempting to accommodate. Wellington Place is located on Bob Hope Drive, a newly reconstructed six lane highway, less than two miles from Eisenhower Medical Center. Is our area really in need of another assisted care residence? This is not my only concern. Myprimary objection to this project lies in the attempt by Pearl Industries to gain a height exception for a three(3) story facility. That anyone would attempt to bypass or eliminate a long standing and respected height restriction in our Valley is cause for serious alarm. I can only hope that the Planning Commission takes this attempt seriously and makes an example of this request by flatly denying to discuss this request, and any and all future requests, for any type of height exception presented to it. To preserve the mountain view for over 100 residents in this neighborhood may seem a small request,but the fact that our homes enjoy an economical advantage due to their available mountain view is a larger issue. Our property values would be severely diminished due to the impediment of our view of the mountains. Property owners in Palm Desert enjoy a substantial increase in economic value due to their mountain views, and advertisements for home sales list the added value of these beautiful views. To hamper or eliminate our views based upon a request from a venture which is already ill-suited for this area is an improper taking and a willful wasting of our property values. Another serious economic consideration to be made is the legal aspect of allowing this project a height exception. To allow this exception would open the City's door to an influx of requests for height exceptions that could not be denied without lawsuits and claims of favoritism. A developer could threaten or even sue the City to get a height exception, placing the City in a position to continually have to defend itself due to the threat of legal action because of discrimination or preferential treatment. Is the City of Palm Desert ready to take on the scores of legal suits that would arise if the City granted this height exception and then declined another height exception after allowing this one? The legal ramifications that could arise with this one height exception need to be weighed, as well as the cost of defense of these claims_ There are only two height exceptions in the valley at this time. The Marriott Desert Springs Hotel and the Marriott timeshare resorts. These properties speak for themselves in terms of location, economic contribution and resort draw/use. I do not believe the project proposed by Pearl Industries comes close to being compared with either of those facilities in stature. More importantly, the locations chose for these multi-storied resorts do not interfere with residential areas, and did not constitute an improper wasting of neighboring property values. -3- 152112.1 9-20-1999 3=28PM FROM P. I hope that this letter accurately conveys my personal opinion and concerts for this project and that my fears of our beautiful desert valley,which I have lived in for more than 30 years, will not be allowed to become so congested and over-developed that we can no longer sec the sun set on our beautiful mountains or have the privilege of knowing our neighbors and friends in a safe and quiet neighborhood. S fs .-'-1, yo rs, 4c�' alla cc: Mr. Philip Drell Director of Community Development -4. 15282.1 l William H.Walton 77297 Chocolate Mountain Road Indian Wells,CA 92210 U.S.A. Phone(760)345-2617 Fax(760)360-3578 RECEIVED September 15, 1999 SEP 2 0 1999 Planning Commission COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 73510 Fred Waring CITY OP PALM DESERT Palm Desert, 92260 Re: Paseo Village Dear Planning Commission, I am familiar with the outline of the above proposed project. I have two interested parties, within my family, that have an interest in purchasing two apartments within said project. We urge your approval to the extent of 28 feet in height. 'ncerely, William Hicks Walton t3`� [tut _ -12,),; 4 + RECEIVED --S-(16 OicavA-- DA-jo-- Face, D.E4.,,,s(- 1eq "z--C G SEP 2 0 1999 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT r; n CITY OF PALM DESERT �i`p z"L /l.U' A-L xrif 60, a_ cOt_ct,z5_3 cg, r}5 .7�� 01,\ W-CO- CO }- . Ohkr&_&QQ C c �-�^tom41,41-3) • 0 4eAcrscAl 2 - a.a-t4,4), „P,L.Q_4;jja 0-1)-QA- CL'CQ 1 bre-b-f 7},kAAJ—• Ca's Cf-9 6-0-- 2,4-4 Fa. ak)-et, l'trcu-rttigk ea-4 i D 1 � I � o r RECEIVED SEP 16 1999 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF PALM DESERT PASEO VILLAGE TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT AN ASSISTED LIVING/SKILLED NURSING AND RETIREMENT RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA SEPTEMBER, 1999 I Robert Bein lillian Frost k Associates PROFESSIONAL ENaaf Rs, FLAMERS t SURVEYORS 74-410 Higher 111 Palm Des ert,Ca. 92260 (760) 346-7481 t TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY '7 INTRODUCTION 5 PROJECT LOCATION 5 EXISTING CONDITIONS 7 Existing Peak Hour Level of Service 11 EXISTING PLUS FUTURE CONDITIONS 12 Existing Plus Future Projects Peak Hour Level of Service 13 EXISTING PLUS FUTURE PLUS PROPOSED PROJECT CONDITIONS 14 Project Trip Generation 14 Project Trip Distribution 16 Project Trip Assignment 16 Existing Plus Future Projects Plus Project Peak Hour Level of Service 16 PARKVIEW DRIVE ADT ANALYSIS 17 Existing ADT 17 Existing Plus Future Projects ADT 18 Existing Plus Future Projects Plus Project ADT 18 PARKING DEMAND 20 ONSITE CIRCULATION 24 APPENDIX A - Existing Peak Hour Traffic Count Data Existing Daily Traffic Count Data APPENDIX B - HCM TRAFFIX Calculation Sheets ROBERT BEIN, WILLIAM FROST & ASSOCIATES PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS , PLANNERS & SURVEYORS September 15, 1999 JN 20-100028 Mr. Mark Greenwood, P.E. Transportation Engineer CITY OF PALM DESERT 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, California 92260-2578 SUBJECT: Traffic Impact Analysis Report- Paseo Village City of Palm Desert Dear Mark: Robert Bein, William Frost and Associates (RBF) has completed a traffic impact report for the proposed Paseo Village-Assisted Living/Skilled Nursing and Retirement Residential Community in the City of Palm Desert. This report outlines existing and proposed conditions, potential traffic impacts, parking demand and site circulation generated by the proposed project. Supportive data has been included in the Appendix. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at (760)346-7481. Sincerely, Q.- \ A. O F Carlos Ortiz, P.E., T.E. =' /� `, 7reCP z J m Project Managerrn y NO.57535 NO. 2025 Public Works/Traffic Engineering * • * s �* CfvlL �P �y TAAFOG gTFOF CAUFG TFOF CAL\FGP CC:Bill Dickson,RBF H:\GRP70\PDATA\20100028\Office\W pwin\028STDY.W PD Professional Service Since 1944 74-410 HIGHWAY 111 • PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260-4114 • 760.346.7481 • FAX 760.346.8315 OFFICES LOCATED THROUGHOUT CALIFORNIA. ARIZONA AND NEVADA• WEB SITE www rbf.com 4 a Traffic Impact Analysis Report o Village Continuing Care Retirement Communi September 15, 1999 Page 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Traffic Impact Analysis Report reviews and analyses existing and future traffic conditions, parking demand and on-site circulation for the proposed Paseo Village-Assisted Living/Skilled Nursing and Retirement Residential Community. Below is a summary of our findings. Traffic Impact Analysis Summary Five signalized intersections near the proposed project site were analysed to determine the Level- Of-Service under existing conditions, existing-plus-future projects conditions and existing-plus- future projects-plus-proposed project conditions. The intersections of Highway 111 at Parkview Drive/Painter's Path, Fred Waring Drive at Town Center Way/One Quail Place, Fred Waring Drive at Monterey Avenue, and Monterey Avenue at Parkview Drive/College of the Desert Entrance under existing conditions, existing-plus-future projects conditions and existing-plus-future projects-plus-proposed project conditions are all forecast to operate at an acceptable Level Of Service (LOS) of C or better during the morning and afternoon peak hour. The LOS at the intersection of Fred Waring Drive at Town Center Way/One Ouail Place changed from "B" to "C" during the afternoon peak hour with the addition of the future project traffic and remained at "C" under existing-plus-future projects-plus-proposed project conditions. The intersections of Highway 111 at Fred Waring Drive under existing conditions, existing-plus- future projects conditions and existing-plus-future projects-plus-proposed project conditions is forecast to operate at an acceptable Level Of Service (LOS) of C or better during, the morning peak hour. The LOS at the intersection of Highway 111 at Fred Waring Drive changed from "C" to "D" during the afternoon peak hour with the addition of future projects traffic and remained at "D" under existing-plus-future projects-plus-proposed project conditions, which does not meet the City's performance objective. The LOS remained at "D"since the intersection peak hour volumes were increased by 13 vehicles (or 0.0023%) due to the proposed project. During the afternoon peak hour the intersection of Monterey Avenue at Parkview Drive/College of the Desert Entrance, the LOS changed from "B" to "C" under existing-plus-future projects- plus-proposed project conditions, which it remains acceptable. During the morning peak hour, the delay increased slightly but the LOS remained the same at the intersections under the different scenarios. Based on the analysis, the proposed project trips generated by the Paseo Village-Assisted Living/Skilled Nursing and Retirement Residential Community will have a minimum impact at the studied intersections during the peak hours. JN 20-100028 Traffic Impact Analysis Report- Village Continuing Care Retirement Community September 15, 1999 Page 3 The project traffic will not have an impact on Fairhaven Drive, since the project trips will not be entering/exiting the project site through Fairhaven Drive and the existing street closure will remain. Parkview Drive Analysis Summary Parkview Drive is a two lane roadway. The City of Palm Desert General Plan Transportation Circulation Element indicates that for a two lane road operating at a LOS of"C" the maximum capacity is 10,000 vehicles. Under existing-plus-future projects-plus-project conditions, the forecast ADT on Parkview Drive will be approximately 6,751 which is below the maximum roadway capacity for a two lane road. Therefore, Parkview Drive is forecast to operate at an acceptable LOS (LOS C or better) under existing-plus-future projects-plus-proposed project conditions. Parking Demand Summary The Paseo Village-Assisted Living/Skilled Nursing and Retirement Residential Community will provide a total of 484 parking spaces; which the Retirement Residential Community will provide a combination of above and underground parking for a total of 432 parking spaces and the Assisted Living/Skilled Nursing will provide a total of 52 parking spaces. Based on the City of Palm Desert parking requirements, the total number of parking spaces required is 306. Therefore 178 additional parking spaces will be provided by the proposed project. Residential/employee/guest/valet parking should be designated accordingly. Non-parking areas should be posted with signs or curb face painted red. Valet parking operations must conform to Palm Desert Municipal Code Chapter 10.50 "Valet Parking". On-Site Circulation Summary The proposed Paseo Village-Assisted Living/Skilled Nursing and Retirement Residential Community will have two driveways fronting Fred Waring Drive. The easterly driveway will serve as an entrance and the westerly driveway will serve as an exit. These driveways will serve primarily visitors and employees for the Assisted Living/Skilled Nursing Building. Access to the residential buildings will be allowed by providing an access road easterly of the Assisted Living/Skilled Nursing Building. Another driveway will be provided at Parkview Drive that will serve as an entrance/exit. This driveway will be primarily used by residents living in the Retirement Residential Community and will be located at the east end of the property. JN 20-100028 ( (4 , I Traffic Impact Analysis Report :o Village Continuing Care Retirement Communi September 15, 1999 • Page 4 Two emergency fire access driveways will be provided by the project. One emergency driveway will be located at the west end of the property fronting Park View Drive. Another emergency driveway will be located at Fairhaven Drive. These driveways will be gated and will serve only emergency vehicles. In order to provide adequate circulation within the Retirement Residential Community, on-site traffic circulation shall be allowed in two directions. Proper signage shall be provided at the two main entrances indicating location of specific buildings and designated parking areas. Vehicles entering from both entrances should be allowed to continue to the designated parking and pick-up/drop-off area. Proper signage should be posted indicating pick-up/drop-off area. Pick-up and drop-off locations shall be properly marked. Delivery/trash pick-up trucks shall be allowed to enter/exit from Fred Waring Drive and Parkview Drive. Access road shall accommodate delivery/trash pick-up trucks. Although no access will be provided from Fairhaven Drive, no parking signs shall be posted on the west side of the street fronting the proposed project to discourage usage of the residential streets. The emergency driveway at Fairhaven Drive shall be used for emergency purposes only. Employees or residents shall not be allowed to enter/exit the property at any time. The following items should be considered for the proposed Paseo Village: - Proposed curb returns shall have a minimum radius of 35 feet. - Proper signage and striping shall be provided at the driveways fronting Fred Waring Drive indicating one-way traffic. - Stop sign and right-turn-only sign shall be provided at the westerly driveway fronting Fred Waring Drive. - Stop sign shall be provided at the driveway fronting Parkview Drive. - Parking stalls for disabled persons shall be provided at the front of the Assisted Living/Skilled Nursing Building. - Parking stalls for disabled persons shall be provided at the front of the Community Center Building and for each of the residential buildings. - Assisted Living/Skilled Nursing employee parking shall be provided near the building. - Parking shall not be allowed along the access road. Curb along access road shall be JN 20-100028 • Traffic Impact Analysis Report-F Village Continuing Care Retirement Community September 15. 1999 Page 5 painted red. -No parking signs shall be posted along the west side of Fairhaven Drive fronting the proposed project. - Parkview Drive shall be striped to provide a westbound left turn lane for vehicles entering the proposed project. The following items should also be considered: - Parkway landscaping or monument signing along Fred Waring Drive and Parkview Drive should not impede or restrict the sight distance of vehicles exiting the site. - The proposed emergency driveways at Parkview Drive (west end of the property) and Fairhaven Drive should be used only for emergency purposes only. Proper signs should be posted and the driveway should be gated to prohibit other usage. INTRODUCTION This traffic study analyzes the forecast traffic impact of the proposed Paseo Village-Assisted Living/Skilled Nursing and Retirement Residential Community in the City of Palm Desert (see Vicinity Map). This study also analyzes the proposed parking demand and on-site circulation generated by the proposed project. The City of Palm Desert staff suggested that five existing signalized intersections should be analysed for potential traffic impacts. These are: • Highway 111 and Parkview Drive/Painter's Path • Highway 111 and Fred Waring Drive • Fred Waring Drive and Town Center Way/One Quail Place • Fred Waring Drive and Monterey Avenue • Monterey Avenue and Parkview Drive/College of the Desert Entrance The City of Palm Desert also requested to analyzed Parkview Drive for potential project impacts. PROJECT LOCATION The site for the proposed Paseo Village-Assisted Living/Skilled Nursing and Retirement Residential Community is bounded between Fred Waring Drive, Fairhaven Drive and Parkview Drive in the City of Palm Desert (see Vicinity Map). The proposed Paseo Village-Assisted Living/Skilled Nursing and Retirement Residential JN 20-100028 1'6 i 1 THOUSAND cr PALMS 0 0 NORTH CATHEDRAL NOT TOSCALC RAMON RD CITY \ J Q Q' a_ 0 . GERALD FORD DR o FRANK SINATRA DR 0 1 0 w w 00 0_ > > 0 Q 0 0 COUNTRY ¢ CLUB o DR RANCHO\--,,,, } m W Q 0 MIRAGE m w Cr O HOVELY LN 42ND AVE BERMUDA 0 0 a FRED WARING DR DUNES PROJECT? 0 Z o EL PASEO 111 1n 1n SITE V)© INDIAN 0 PALM WELLS 0 in 0 • DESERT = LA N W LL QUINTA C74-.) I PASEO VILLAGE VICINITY MAP G-14R, Robert Bein lillian Frost t Associates PROFESSIONAL ENGMERS. FLAMERS k 9RVEYCRS 74-410 Highiay 111 Palm 0esert.Ca. 92260 (760) 346-7481 J08 NO. 10-100028 28V 1 CMAP.DWG Traffic Impact Analysis Report-F Village Continuing Care Retirement Community September 15, 1999 Page 6 Community will provide the facilities shown on Table "1". TABLE 1 PASEO VILLAGE ASSISTED LIVING/SKILLED NURSING & RETIREMENT RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY FACILITY NUMBER OF AREA BEDS-UNITS- (Sq. Ft.) SPACES Assisted Living/Skilled 99 Bed 51,466 Nursing Building Residential Buildings 254 500,086 Community Center 62,480 Building Parking Spaces 484 Exhibit "1" shows the proposed Paseo Village-Assisted Living/Skilled Nursing and Retirement Residential Community. The residential buildings will provide one, two and three bedroom units. The unit breakdown are as follows: One bedroom - 158 units Two bedrooms - 90 units Three bedrooms - 6 units The proposed Paseo Village-Retirement Residential Community will provide a combination of above and underground parking. The breakdown of above/underground parking are as follows: Above Parking - 114 spaces Underground Parking - 318 spaces Underground parking will serve primarily residents. The Community Center will use some spaces for valet parking (33 spaces). Each residential building will be provided with an access to the underground parking area. The above parking area adjacent to the residential buildings and the community center will be designated guest parking/employee parking. The parking area fronting the Assisted Living/Skilled Nursing Building will be designated guest parking. Employee parking will be provided adjacent to the building. No underground parking will be provided for the Assisted Living/Skilled Nursing Building. ) JN 20-100028 mor - .1;r I4T.FL 48,4C - - _ dna FM - 4716• t. V?..Gl- ..,.44•0, 'To-rAL - 114,41.61.4)44% k 4u t' F' CO 7 \\-\ �3 `r 6 O 1 i____) —s �S 1 '' ''.. ..r-:‘;',.'-.>'4:::! J 0 � k- 1 y t k O P r�c- 1 Q- �_ 1 (:�� f:;_. ;� F- W Z /14 1 T -T' I > E r 3s1"o m • Z '-'14 \ Asti.w a,.- - , I\ fa: - ..fre- - } �.fig; I o U k.) III El 4 ` nB ovc C .0U140 € wJ6 - to .60 140f1M rIYE.1'fAi. duu.OWG 1e0 -.'•ir" ;a,,. 14012 'A - 1 \ / 11-7 SptNN (1tr4.,oem1AI. pULpR 4 I14 "-.5 - an...0 \V/ *13 A4414 1I4 4 6.JIL'fl44 14 c _ - 484 404l.E4 - � C. ..a. wo 203q . 40rE OaLGcAn .eo....r: I.+gad-O" , _ ' a. a ow. �y.. ►.M�ip OM GWI.IYMT�00011. TT'''��//LL�r�_ ^{•T • EXNIE171.1�l'1. ` ( -,�•r�`fi..y�n'.., • Traffic Impact Analysis Report Village Continuing Care Retirement Communit} September 15, 1999 Page 7 The number of parking spaces that will be provided for the Assisted Living/Skilled Nursing Building are as follows: Above Parking - Guest Parking - 34 spaces Employee Parking - 18 spaces One entrance and one exit only driveway will be provided at Fred Waring Drive. An entrance/exit driveway will be provided at Parkview Drive at the east side of the property. Another driveway will be provided on Parkview Drive for emergency purposes at the west side of the property. Another emergency entrance/exit driveway will be provided at Fairhaven Drive. The proposed emergency driveway at Fairhaven Drive will be used only by emergency vehicles for emergency purposes only. Others will not be allowed to use this driveway. This driveway will remain close at all times to discourage residents, employees and visitors usage of the residential streets adjacent to the proposed project. EXISTING CONDITIONS Highway 111 and Parkview Drive/Painter's Path Highway 111 is a major divided highway that serves various cities and communities from the west to the east of the Coachella Valley. At Parkview Drive/Painter's path, Highway 111 provides a landscaped median, a left turn lane and three through lanes for the northbound and southbound approach. It also provides a northbound right turn lane. Parkview Drive (westbound approach) is a secondary road and is composed of a through-left turn lane and a right turn lane. Painter's Path (eastbound approach) is a secondary road and is composed of a left-through-right turn lane. Currently the intersection is a signalized intersection. The traffic signal provides protected left- turns for only the northbound and southbound traffic. The traffic signal has split phasing for the eastbound and westbound traffic. The posted speed limit on Highway 111 is 50 miles-per-hour (MPH). The posted speed for Parkview Drive is 45 MPH. Pedestrian crossing is allowed at the intersection and on-street parking is not allowed on Highway 111 and Parkview Drive/Painter's Path. JN 20-100028 r �. `` ) r. Traffic Impact Analysis Report D Village Continuing Care Retirement Communii September 15, 1999 Page 8 Highway 111 and Fred Waring Drive Highway 111 is a major divided highway that provides a landscaped median, dual left turn lanes and three through lanes for the northbound and southbound approach. Fred Waring Drive is an east-west arterial road that travels from the city of Palm Desert to the city of Indio. At Highway 111, Fred Waring Drive is composed of dual left turn lanes,two through lanes, and dual right turn lanes for the westbound approach. The eastbound approach is composed of a landscaped median, dual left turn lanes, two through lanes and a right turn lane. The intersection is a signalized intersection and provides protected left-turns for all the approaches. The posted speed limit on Highway 111 is 50 MPH. The posted speed for Fred Waring Drive is 45 MPH. Pedestrian crossing is allowed at the intersection and on-street parking is not allowed on Highway 111 and Fred Waring Drive. A bus stop is provided on Highway 111 north and south of Fred Waring Drive. Fred Waring Drive and Town Center Way/One Quail Place Fred Waring Drive is composed of a left turn lane, two through lanes, and a right turn lane for the westbound and eastbound approach. A landscaped median is provided at the westbound approach. Town Center Way is a divided secondary road and is composed of a landscaped median, a left turn lane, a through lane and a right turn lane. Town Center Way provides access to the Palm Desert Mall. The golf cart northbound route terminates before the intersection. One Quail Place serves as the main entrance to One Quail Place Apartments and is composed of a landscaped median and a left-through-right turn lane. The intersection is a signalized intersection. The traffic signal provides protected left-turns for only the westbound and eastbound traffic. The posted speed for Fred Waring Drive is 45 MPH. The posted speed for Town Center Way is 35 MPH. Pedestrian crossing is allowed at the intersection and on-street parking is not allowed on Fred Waring Drive, Town Center Way and One Quail Place. A bus stop is located on Town Center Way south of Fred Waring Drive. JN 20-100028 • Traffic Impact Analysis Report )Village Continuing Care Retirement Communit_ September 15. 1999 Paee 9 Fred Waring Drive and Monterey Avenue Fred Waring Drive is an arterial road and is composed of dual turn lanes, two through lanes, and a right turn lane for the westbound and eastbound approach. The landscaped median terminates before the entrance to the left turn lanes. Monterey Avenue is an north-south arterial road that travels from north of the Interstate 10 to Highway 111. At the intersection, Monterey Avenue is composed of dual left turn lanes and three through lanes for the northbound and southbound approach. A right turn lane is provided for southbound traffic. The landscaped median terminates before the entrance to the left turn lanes. The intersection is a signalized intersection and provides protected left-turns for all the approaches. The posted speed limit on Fred Waring Drive is 45 MPH. The posted speed for Monterey Avenue is 40 MPH. Pedestrian crossing is allowed at the intersection and on-street parking is not allowed on Fred Waring Drive and Monterey Avenue. The McCallum Theater, College of the Desert and the College and County libraries are located at the northeast quadrant. A bus stop is located on Fred Waring Drive west of Monterey Avenue and on Monterey Avenue south of Fred Waring Drive. Monterey Avenue and Parkview Drive/College of the Desert Entrance Monterey Avenue is composed of dual left turn lanes, two through lanes and a right turn lane for the southbound approach. The landscaped median terminates before the entrance to the dual left turn lanes. The northbound approach provides a left turn lane, two through lanes and a right turn lane with a landscaped median. The College of the Desert (COD) Entrance serves as the main entrance to the COD campus. A landscaped median, a left turn lane and a through-right turn lane is provided for westbound traffic. Parkview Drive is a east-west secondary road that extends from Highway 111 to Monterey Avenue. At the intersection, Parkview Drive is composed of a left turn lane and a through-right turn lane. The posted speed for Monterey Avenue south of Parkview Drive/COD Entrance is 40 MPH. The posted speed for Monterey Avenue north of Parkview Drive/COD Entrance is 45 MPH. TN 20-100028 • Traffic Impact Analysis Report o Village Continuing Care Retirement Communi September 15, 1999 Page 10 The posted speed for Parkview Drive is 45 MPH. A bike lane/golf cart lane is provided on Monterey Avenue north of Parkview Drive/COD Entrance. Pedestrian crossing is allowed at the intersection and on-street parking is not allowed on Monterey Avenue and the COD Entrance. Fairhaven Drive Fairhaven Drive north of Fred Waring Drive is a residential street that extends to Parkview Drive. The City of Palm Desert has closed Fairhaven Drive just north of Fred Waring Drive to disallow non-residents traveling through the residential streets. In the past, motorists were using Fairhaven Drive as an alternate route to avoid the intersection of Fred Waring Drive and Monterey Avenue. Presently, Fairhaven Drive is used primarily by people attending the church located at the northwest quadrant. The driveway to the church parking lot is located on Fairhaven Drive before the road closure. On the other side of the road closure, Fairhaven Drive is primarily used by residents. Fairhaven Drive is stop control at Fred Waring Drive and motorists are allow to travel eastbound or westbound on Fred Waring Drive. Fred Waring Drive provides an eastbound left turn lane at Fairhaven Drive. Parkview Drive Parkview Drive is an east-west secondary road that extends from Highway 111 to Monterey Avenue. East of Monterey Avenue is the main entrance to College of the Desert. Presently, Parkview Drive is a two lane roadway with a striped median. According to the City of Palm Desert General Plan Transportation Circulation Element, Parkview Drive is designated to be a four lane roadway. Existing Peak Hour Turning Movements Counts Existing morning and afternoon peak hour turning movements counts were taken at the intersections to determine the peak hour Level of Service (LOS) at the study intersections. The peak hour turning movements counts were taken on June 1999. Exhibit "2" through Exhibit "6" shows the peak hour turning movement counts for the five studied intersections. The City of Palm Desert Staff provided morning and afternoon peak hour turning movements counts that were taken during February and March of 1999. JN 20-100028 o N NORTH O CD V Nt C) (O ►� o �) Lf� PARK VIEW ) DRIVE 83 112 8 13 29 9 11 26 9 2 4 4 0 o y) >- PEAK HOUR: Q N _ CD AM 8: 00 - 9: 00 PM 4: 00 - 5: 00 PEAK HOUR PM AM TRAFFIC VOLUMES EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES HIGHWAY 111 @ PARK VIEW DRIVE PASEO VILLAGE EXHIBIT "2 " 1113 Robert Rein lillian Frost k Associates PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS, FLAMERS t SURVEYORS 74-HO HighpY 111 Palm Desert,Ca. 92260 (760) 346-7481 JOB NO. 10-100028 EXHIBITA.DWG NORTH In O O N N co N FRED WARING I DRIVE 269 338 50 143 98 21 -� 40 190 117 17 - 70 15 -� N O co >- PEAK HOUR: I N N AM 8: 00 - 9: 00 CD = PM 3: 00 - 4: 00 PEAK HOUR PM AV } TRAFFIC VOLUMES EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES HIGHWAY 111 @ FRED WARING DRIVE PASEO VILLAGE EXHIBIT "3 " G-74q Robert Bein li I I ian Frost k Associates PRQ ESS I Ot k ENGINEERS, FLAMERS k SIRvEYN6 74-410 Higher III Palm Desert,Ca. 92260 (760) 346-7481 JOB NO. 10-100028 EXHIBITA.DWG W U Z Q CC O JZ < LjJ NORTH �Dy I ' U W < 0 O rn O N FRED WARING DRIVE 12 31 � 292 - 431 23 4 133 147 495 201 - 114 56 1 ( I- N CD CO PEAK HOUR: CC w - o Lc) co AM 8: 00 - 9: 00 1-- z w U PM - 4: 30 - 5: 30 z 0 F- PEAK HOUR PM AM - TRAFFIC VOLUMES EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES FRED WARING DRIVE @ TOWN CENTER WAY PASEO VILLAGE EXHIBIT "4 " 94v Robert Belaul in o+ct Aillion,Frost k AstsociatesToas PRorEssrRs su 14 410 Higher 111 Palm Desert,Co. 92260 (760) 346-7481 JOB NO. 10-100028 EXHIBITA.DWG l��l • i • 0 NORTH W N LC) N' Qn z w Qrn oo FRED WARING DRIVE 140 198'` - 410 425 182 54 - 153 199 560 194 - 65 49 I ( LC) N PEAK HOUR: O O) in i N AM 8: 00 - 9: 00 >- PM 5: 00 - 6: 00 w F z 0 PEAK HOUR PM I AM I - TRAFFIC VOLUMES EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES FRED WARING DRIVE @ MONTEREY AVENUE PASEO VILLAGE EXHIBIT "5 " Vi Robert Bein Mi I I ion Frost k Associates PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS. PLANERS k SLRVEYCRS 14-410HigNar III Palm Desert,Co. 92260 (760) 346-7481 JOB NO. 10-100028 EXHIBITA.DWG © tr, NORTH W _;c. .. .co .) z W < co PARK VIEW } I DRIVE 24 91 � - 19 37 84 55 - 14 38 29 77 - 67 56 1 N >-- LU PEAK HOUR: Of AM 8: 00 - 9: 00 z O PM 3: 00 - 4: 00 PEAK HOUR PM I AM } TRAFFIC VOLUMES EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES MONTEREY AVENUE @ PARK VIEW DRIVE PASEO VILLAGE9 �� " -140, Robert &in Killion frost Associates EXHIBIT (J PROrES510NAL ENGIW RS, PIAMERS k SIRVETORS 74-410Hf¢noy 111 Palm Desert,Ca. 92260 (760) 346-7481 JOB NO. 10-100028 EXHIBITA.DWG • Traffic Impact Analysis Report o Village Continuing Care Retirement Communi September 15, 1999 ' Page 11 The February/March 1999 traffic counts were compare with the June 1999 traffic counts to determine if the traffic volumes decreased during the month of June. In the past, traffic volumes during the winter months were typically higher than the summer months. In previous years, more people visited the Coachella Valley during the winter months so traffic during the winter months were higher than the summer months. At the intersections of Highway 111 at Fred Waring Drive and Monterey Avenue at Parkview Drive/COD Entrance, the peak hour traffic volumes were slighter higher during the winter (Exhibit "3" and Exhibit "6"). At the other intersections, the peak hour traffic volumes during the summer months were similar or higher than the winter months. The intersections were analysed using the highest peak hour volumes. EXISTING LEVEL OF SERVICE To determine the existing operating Level of Service (LOS) of the study intersections, the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) analysis methodology for Signalized Intersections was utilized. To describe the quality of the operation of an intersection, a range of LOS from LOS A (little or no delay) to LOS F (extreme delays when traffic volume exceeds the capacity provided) is utilized. LOS is based on the intersection capacity and volume of traffic utilizing the intersection related to vehicular delay experienced by motorists and controlled by stop signs at the intersection. Table 2 summarizes the range of LOS correlated to seconds of delay experience per vehicle at signalized intersections. TABLE 2 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) LOS AVERAGE TOTAL DELAY (SECONDS) A <_ 5.0 B > 5.O and <_ 10.0 C > 15.0 and < 25.0 D > 25.0 and <_ 40.0 E > 40.0 and <_ 60.0 F > 60.0 JN 20-100028 ' Traffic Impact Analysis Report- Village Continuing Care Retirement Communit} September 15, 1999 Page 12 According to City of Palm Desert General Plan Transportation Circulation Element, LOS C is the performance objective. The goal of the City of Palm Desert is to maintain LOS C or better at intersections during peak hour operation. Mitigation is required by the City for projects that cause intersections to operate at LOS D, E or F during the peak hour as a result of project-generated traffic. Utilizing the HCM analysis method for Signalized Intersections, the selected intersections were analysed. Detailed HCM calculation sheets are included in the Appendix. Table 3 summarizes the calculated Level of Service (LOS) for the study intersections under existing conditions. TABLE 3 1999 PEAK HOUR LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) INTERSECTION A.M. A.M. P.M. P.M. DELAY LOS DELAY LOS (sec/veh) (sec/veh) Highway 111 @ Parkview Drive/Painter's 8.8 B 9.4 B Path Highway 1 1 1 @ Fred Waring Drive 19.2 C 22.7 C Fred Waring Drive @ Town Center 13.5 B 14.4 B Way/One Quail Place Fred Waring Drive @ Monterey Avenue 18.9 C 20.3 C Monterey Avenue @ Parkview Drive/ 11.6 B 9.8 B COD Entrance As indicated on Table 3, the analysed intersections are operating at an acceptable LOS (LOS C or better) during the morning and afternoon peak hours. EXISTING-PLUS-FUTURE PROJECTS Based on information provided by the City, a three percent growth rate per year was used to forecast traffic generated by future projects that will impact the studied intersections. The year analysed under future projects is 2010. The peak hour trips forecast to be generated by the future projects were distributed to the street circulation system surrounding the project site. Exhibit "7" through Exhibit "11" shows the morning and afternoon peak hour turning movements traffic volumes for the existing-plus-future projects scenario for the studied intersections. JN 20-100028 0 1-- NORTH '4" c0 to PO N N PARK VIEW J I \ DRIVE 115 155 11 18 40 12 15 36 12 3 6 6 (--. in ao N >- Q CD - 0) 01 CN I CP NI- .-- CD I PEAK HOUR PM AM - - TRAFFIC VOLUMES EXISTING -PLUS- FUTURE PROJECTS TRAFFIC VOLUMES HIGHWAY 111 @ PARK VIEW DRIVE PASEO VILLAGE EXHIBIT "7 " 94? Robert Iot&4inLENGILilian,Frost kAssociatkARYEYaRSes PROFESSPEE7 RR�ERS 74-410 Rigtwy I11 Patin Desert,Ca. 92260 (260) 346-7481 J08 NO. 10-100028 EXHIBITA.DWG • • 0 In ' NORTH CDNt v. M 1- op (13 N FRED WARING .} J i DRIVE \ ----- 372 468 69 198 136 29 ,- 55 263 162 24 97 21 ,----- 1 ( N >- Q 0 CD I PEAK HOUR PM AM - TRAFF I C VOLUMES EXISTING -PLUS- FUTURE PROJECTS TRAFFIC VOLUMES HIGHWAY 111 @ FRED WARING DRIVE PASEO VILLAGE EXHIBIT "8 " CVRobert IO4AL&i Eli,'Ai ItFEF�,I I ion Frost k AssociatkAR4EratSes PROFESS RutFR6 74-410 Highor III Palm Desert,Ca. 92260 (760) 346-7481 JOB NO. 10-100028 EXHIBITA.DWG ♦, .,,- U U z z aw NORTH CY w N ttE2N U w < FRED WARING DRIVE 17 43 404 597 32 6 - 184 203 685 278 158 78 -� c in in re) N (Ni N Z N N w U Z 0 F- PEAK HOUR PM AM - TRAFF I C VOLUMES EXISTING -PLUS- FUTURE PROJECTS TRAFFIC VOLUMES FRED WARING DRIVE @ TOWN CENTER WAY PASEO VILLAGE EXHIBIT "9 " 94,3 Robed Bein Lilian Frost k Associates PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS, FLAMERS k SURVEYORS 14-410 H4lay 111 Palm Desert,Ca. 92260 (760) 346-7481 JOB NO. 10-100028 EXHIBITA.DWG • o. NORTH (7) CV W > r� < L FRED WAKING / DRIVE 194 274 _ - 568 588 252 75 212 275 775 269 - 90 68 1 ( CV CD d LO - O f� r W W I- Z 0 PEAK HOUR PM AM - TRAFF I C VOLUMES EXISTING -PLUS- FUTURE PROJECTS TRAFFIC VOLUMES FRED WARING DRIVE @ MONTEREY AVENUE PASEO VILLAGE EXHIBIT "1 " 9413 Robert Be in lillion Frost t Associates O PROFESSIONAL ENGIAEERS, FLAMERS k SLRYEICRS 74-410 Highpy III Palm Desert,Ca. 92260 (760) 346-7481 JOB NO. 10-100028 EXHIBITA.DWG I , NORTH U t() 110 Z U h co o0 00 CD N PARK VIEW DRIVE 1 33 126 26 51 116 76 19 53 40 107 - 93 78 �\ I ( N OD CD p U H— N z 0 PEAK HOUR PM AM - TRAFF I C VOLUMES EXISTING -PLUS- FUTURE PROJECTS TRAFFIC VOLUMES MONTEREY AVENUE @ PARK VIEW DRIVE PA SEO VILLAGE EXHIBIT "11 " 944 Robert Bein fill ian Frost k Associates PROFESSIONAL EX DEERS, PLANERS k SLEVEYORS 74-410 Highway III Palm Desert,Ca. 92260 (760) 346-7481 JOB NO. 10-100028 EXHIBITA.DWG Traffic Impact Analysis Report )Village Continuing Care Retirement Communit, September 15, 1999 Page 13 EXISTING-PLUS-FUTURE PROJECTS LEVEL OF SERVICE Utilizing the HCM analysis method for Signalized Intersections, the studied intersections were analyzed. Detailed HCM calculation sheets are included in the Appendix. Table 4 summarizes the calculated intersection LOS for the existing-plus-future projects scenario. TABLE 4 EXISTING-PLUS-FUTURE PROJECTS PEAK HOUR LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) INTERSECTION A.M. A.M. P.M. P.M. DELAY LOS DELAY LOS (sec/veh) (sec/veh) Highway 111 @ Parkview Drive/ 9.9 B 10.8 B Painter's Path Highway 111 @ Fred Waring Drive 20.4 C 28.6 D Fred Waring Drive @ Town Center 14.0 B 17.8 C Way/One Quail Place Fred Waring Drive @ Monterey Avenue 18.3 C 21.0 C Monterey Avenue @.Parkview Drive/ 12.1 B 12.0 B COD Entrance As shown on Table 4, the intersections are forecast to operate at an acceptable LOS (LOS C or better) during the morning peak hours under the existing-plus-future projects scenario. Three of the intersections are forecast to operate at an acceptable LOS during the afternoon peak hour under the existing-plus-future projects scenario. Comparing Table "3" and Table "4" it shows that with the addition of the future project traffic there is a slight increase in delay and no change in LOS at three locations during the morning and afternoon peak hours, therefore there is no significant traffic impact at these intersections. The LOS at the intersection of Fred Waring Drive at Town Center Way/One Ouail Place changed from "B" to "C" during the afternoon peak hour with the addition of the future project traffic, which it remains acceptable. The LOS at the intersection of Highway 111 at Fred Waring Drive changed from "C" to "D" during the afternoon peak hour with the addition of the future project traffic, which does not meet the City's performance objective. JN 20-100028 Itp-i Traffic Impact Analysis Report o Village Continuing Care Retirement Communii September 15, 1999 Page 14 EXISTING-PLUS-FUTURE PROJECTS-PLUS-PROPOSED PROJECT CONDITIONS TRIP GENERATION The proposed project will consist of two different type of land use, these are: - Assisted Living/Skilled Nursing (Nursing Home) - Retirement Residential Community The project has been analysed using both land use scenarios accordingly, since each land use will generate different number of trips. To determine the trips to be generated by the proposed Assisted Living/Skilled Nursing and Retirement Residential Community, the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual (6th Edition) trip generation rates were utilized. The trip generation rates for the proposed Assisted Living/Skilled Nursing Building were obtained from the ITE Trip Generation Manual Land Use 620 (Nursing Home). These rates were derived from similar facilities whose primary function is to care for persons who are unable to care for themselves, for example rest homes, chronic care and convalescent homes. The ITE rates are based per number of occupied beds. The trip generation rates for the proposed Retirement Residential Community were obtained from the ITE Trip Generation Manual Land Use 253 (Elderly Housing Attached). These rates were derived from similar facilities that are restricted to senior citizens; contains residential units similar to apartments and condominiums. It may contain special services such as medical facilities, dining facilities and limited retail facilities. The ITE rates are based on number of dwelling units. Table 5 shows the trip generation rates utilized to forecast peak hour trips generated by the proposed Assisted Living/Skilled Nursing Building and Retirement Residential Community. JN 20-100028 Traffic Impact Analysis Report r Village Continuing Care Retirement Communit. September 15, 1999 Page 15 TABLE 5 PASEO VILLAGE ITE TRIP GENERATION RATES LAND USE DAILY A.M. PEAK HOUR P.M. PEAK HOUR IN OUT TOTAL IN OUT TOTAL Assisted Living/ 3.24 .118 .072 .19 .071 .099 .17 Skilled Nursing- 99 Occupied Beds Retirement Residential 3.48 .044 .026 .07 .059 .041 .10 Community- 256 Dwelling Units Table 6 summarizes the forecast peak hour trips to be generated by the proposed project utilizing the trip generation rates shown in Table 5. TABLE 6 PASEO VILLAGE FORECAST PROJECT TRIP GENERATION LAND USE DAILY A.M. PEAK HOUR P.M. PEAK HOUR IN OUT TOTAL IN OUT TOTAL Assisted Living/ 321 12 7 19 7 10 17 Skilled Nursing- 99 Occupied Beds Retirement Residential 891 11 7 18 15 11 26 Community- 256 Dwelling_ Units TOTAL 1212 23 14 37 22 21 43 As indicated on Table 6, the proposed Assisted Living/Skilled Nursing Building and Retirement Residential Community are forecast to generate 37 morning, peak hour trips, 43 afternoon peak hour trips and 1212 daily trips. JN 20-100028 I Traffic Impact Analysis Report o Village Continuing Care Retirement Communi September 15. 1999 Page 16 TRIP DISTRIBUTION The proposed main entrance/exit for the proposed Assisted Living/Skilled Nursing Building will be from Fred Waring Drive, therefore the majority of motorists traveling to the Assisted Living/Skilled Nursing Building will be from Fred Waring Drive. A few motorists will enter/exit from Parkview Drive through the Retirement Residential Community. The proposed main entrance/exit for the Retirement Residential Community will be from Parkview Drive, therefore the majority of residents/visitors traveling to the community will enter/exit via Parkview Drive. A few number of residents/visitors will enter/exit the community from Fred Waring Drive through the access road adjacent to the Assisted Living/Skilled Nursing Building. Project trip distribution percentages generated by the Assisted Living/Skilled Nursing Building is shown on Exhibit "12". Project trip distribution percentages generated by the Retirement Residential Community is shown on Exhibit "13". TRIP ASSIGNMENT Exhibit "14" shows the A.M. and P.M. peak hour trips (inbound and outbound) generated by the Assisted Living/Skilled Nursing Building and Retirement Residential Community. The peak hour trips were distributed to the roadway system surrounding the project site based on the project trip distribution percentages shown on Exhibit "12" and Exhibit "13". Exhibit "15", Exhibit "16", Exhibit "17", Exhibit "18" and Exhibit "19" show the morning and afternoon peak hour turning movements traffic volumes for the existing-plus-future projects-plus proposed project scenario for Highway 111 at Parkview Drive/Painter's Path. Highway 111 at Fred Waring Drive, Fred Waring Drive at Town Center Way/One Quail Place. Fred Waring Drive at Monterey Avenue and Monterey Avenue at Parkview Drive/COD Entrance, respectively. EXISTING-PLUS-FUTURE PROJECTS-PLUS-PROPOSED PROJECT LEVEL OF SERVICE Utilizing the HCM analysis method for Signalised Intersections, the five studied intersections were analyzed. Detailed HCM calculation sheets are included in the Appendix. Table 7 summarizes the calculated intersection LOS for the existing-plus-future projects-plus proposed project scenario. JN 20-100028 W 0 z LiPASEO VILLAGE CONTINUING CARE RETIREMENT COMMUNITY: a N 0 R T H 01 SKILLED NURSING BUILDING (ASSISTED LIVING) >. NOT To xut Li © RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS/COMMUNITY CENTER W I— z 0 M X o \ u) 0 0 010% 010% 0 0 L. L_ 10% 10 105% _! _J 1 -- 0% 07 r 0o% y f 1Qo% �/ 0% 0 PARK VIEW DRIVE 1010/ 1010% Oj 5% --i 0 } r ,//// /// ,/ /r / 1020% O7 } x / / N o 2 / / , PASEO VILLAGE 00 // /, �/ //j,/ O O / / , / / _ / / / , / / O �/ / // / // SAN JUAN / / // / / DRIVE - / / z In in X ,/ / to > ARBOLEDA DRIVE 00 N X / EXISTING Q O L_ 20%0 / / // "ao% I Li I O O / / O aEE L► i 5O/O / / L.L. o FRED WARING DRIVE 1 / / F C20% __05% �% O OqS y�f 45% 10 L A O�/2`0%y O 1`IJ" 15% 10* 1 r— c- 20%0* so%0 60%® % y �Q g o (�� LEGEND: 1010/� O O 0 r I /0� SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION Z 0 A U—TURN PROJECT TRAFFIC AT FAIRHAVEN DRIVE w 0 * LEFT TURN & U—TURN PROJECT TRAFFIC z 3 >- o < ASSISTED LIVING/SKILLED NURSING BUILDING PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES PASEO VILLAGE EXHIBIT "12 " 9B Robert Be in lillion Frost k Associates PRffESSlQUL EVWERS, PLANERS t SLRVFYORS 14-410High.ay Ili Palm Desert,Ca. 92260 (760) 346-7481 JOB NO. 10-100028 BLDG1 .DWG W O Z W Q NORTH PASEO VILLAGE CONTINUING CARE RETIREMENT COMMUNITY: NOT TO xus �— 10 SKILLED NURSING BUILDING (ASSISTED LIVING) W 20 RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS/COMMUNITY CENTER o m X 0 X N O 0 0 20 30% 20 40% 1 L L lox 20 - 2020% 010% -- 1 o% 20 7 r ©° — Oo% 10% �0 PARK VIEW DRIVE 0 030% 2 0% 020%. —1 r , , , / 0 2 / / // / / PASEO VILLAGE N / / / // / 0 ii 3 // / / I / / O / / 04/ / // / // SAN JUAN / / // / DRIVE i // / z o X X / // ExlsnHc Li > ARBOLEDA DRIVE 8I 0 1 5%O / / // CHURCH tn 2� ; OO L— o N / / Q > a L `—010 0 / / o FRED WARING DRIVE L 2010% 11 �SRO / // f 010% f �0S% / 10/ f 10% 2 rn 00, 0 0 % 1 O%�2 * L30% 20 2 0%�-) 010% Op%-A Or t 0 I r �10%0* 05% y X o • o X r LEGEND: 2 i—i 0 0 0 0 w o 0 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION z 0 A U—TURN PROJECT TRAFFIC AT FAIRHAVEN DRIVE z * LEFT TURN & U—TURN PROJECT TRAFFIC 3 >- 0 3 RETIREMENT RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES PASEO VILLAGE EXHIBIT "13 " cv Robert Bein Lilian Frost k Associates PROFESSIONAL MICAS,, FLAMERS k SRYEYORS 14-410 Higheay 111 Polm Desert,Co. 92260 (760) 346-7481 JOB NO. 10-100028 8LDG2.DWG . . . . O W Z W NORTH PASEO VILLAGE CONTINUING CARE RETIREMENT COMMUNITY: NOT TO!CALL >. 10 SKILLED NURSING BUILDING (ASSISTED LIVING) ce LAi 0 RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS/COMMUNITY CENTER o m N in 6 4 Ei 6 6 .—_._. -- M o N N 2 r -- 1 --- 0 1 In NI- 4 3 a - 1Ol�� 1 1 PARK VIEW DRIVE 4. ''a 2 1 i 1 , r // // // / // 0 N / PASEO VILLAGE N /N N / / / / / tel / / / / / / / . / / / // // // 0 / / // / // SAN JUAN / / // / DRIVE // / / `/ /� o ^ / / / -- - / Z N / // EXISTING a ARBOLEDA DRIVE ^ - 1 2- / / // CHURCH == La L_ N N / / Q lY L / / L` o FRED WARING DRIVE 1 1 1 3 3 -J / /// — 4 2 -H 2 1 _ 5 6 I---- 4 5 r 13 10A 2 1 - 1 0 0 0 i t r i 3 6 * 8 9 1 1 ; --- LEGEND: — v — — SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION N In — N M CC LL i - U-TURN PROJECT TRAFFIC AT FAIRHAVEN DRIVE IZ M * LEFT TURN & U-TURN PROJECT TRAFFIC W U Z PM AM —PEAK HOUR PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES 3 >- o3 ASSISTED LIVING/SKILLED NURSING AND RETIREMENT RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY A.M. & P.M. PEAK HOUR PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION PASEO VILLAGE EXHIBIT "14 " 113 Robert Bein liIIion Frost t Associates PROFESSIUTAL ENG1t , PLANERS k SURVEYORS 71-41a Highway 111 Palm Desert,Ca. 92260 (760) 346-7481 JOB NO. 10-100028 BLDG2.DWG 3 NORTH CO cy) OD LO N N PARK VIEW f DRIVE 117 157 11 19 40 12 16 37 13 4 6 6 1 ( if) CD N (NJ OD 01 _ c CD PEAK HOUR EXISTING PM AM -PLUS- TRAFFIC VOLUMES FUTURE PROJECTS -PLUS- PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES HIGHWAY 111 @ PARK VIEW DRIVE PASEO VILLAGE EXHIBIT "15 " All Robert Bein Lilian Frost k Associates — PRffESSIaUL ENGIFEERS, FLAMERS k ARYEYCRS 'I"' 14-41a Higlgiry 111 Palm Desert,Ca. 92260 (760) 345-7481 JOB NO. 10-100028 EXHIB(TA.DWG 0 tp NORTHNrrn CD rn r oo (NJ , r,r) FRED WARING _) 9 l DRIVE 373 470 - 69 198 136 29 58 266 162 24 97 21 ---- 1 ( >- PEAK HOUR EXISTING PM AM - —PLUS— TRAFFIC VOLUMES FUTURE PROJECTS —PLUS— PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES HIGHWAY 111 @ FRED WARING DRIVE PASEO VILLAGE EXHIBIT "16 " Robert &in MiIlion Frost k Associates PROFESSIQ4F1 rJrGlPEFJtS, RAMFRS t 9AVEYORS 74-410 Hi away 111 Palm 0esert,Ca. 92260 (760) 346-7481 • JOB NO. 10-100028 EXHIBITA.DWG • • W U Z Q CC J 1— 0 Z �/� Q W NORTH D — in in 0 W N N U W < 00_ N .t- r` FRED WARING DRIVE 17 43 - 408 602 32 6 .---• 187 209 690 284 - 158 78 Q tn CO N CC PO N (0 I— N N N Z W U Z 0 1— PEAK HOUR EXISTING PM AM -PLUS- TRAFFIC VOLUMES FUTURE PROJECTS -PLUS- PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES FRED WARING DRIVE @ TOWN CENTER WAY PASEO VILLAGE EXHIBIT "17 " 943 Robert Rein Aillion Frost kAssociotes PROFESSIONAL EAGINEfon. root iS k Sociato S 74-410 High.,ill Palm Desert,Co. 92260 (760) 346-7481 JOB NO. 10-100028 EXHIBITA.DWG le • 0 T NORTH LiM rng(70 N Z u_.J > .:r in •-- N LC) co CV FRED WARING } ,) DRIVE 195 275 570 589 252 75 212 275 776 269 - 91 69 --, N d' N CO yr) Lc-) co tr) O ':f- n r•r) UJ CC W F— Z 0 PEAK HOUR EXISTING PM AM - -PLUS— TRAFFIC VOLUMES FUTURE PROJECTS -PLUS- PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES FRED WARING DRIVE @ MONTEREY AVENUE PASEO VILLAGE EXHIBIT "18 " 94/ Robert Rein L(Iian Frost t Associates PoberttQ1AL EHGt I ia ,Frost FRS t OCigR5 74-410 Highway Ill Palm Desert,Ca. 92260 (760) 346-7481 JOB NO. 10-100028 EXHIBITA.DWG l 0 NORTH W c N D co 71 c z W c — co Q a) O N PARK VIEW ) ,,) 1 \ DRIVE 33 126 26 51 120 79 - 19 53 40 107 95 79 in 1 ( CO CO co tI) l_iJ p N `71- 0 PEAK HOUR EXISTING PM AM - -PLUS- TRAFFIC VOLUMES FUTURE PROJECTS -PLUS- PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES MONTEREY AVENUE @ PARK VIEW DRIVE PASEO VILLAGE EXHIBIT "19 '' Robert IOHAL&in ENGI14liHionFR5,Frost t Assoctiates PRffESS ft MEl� 9RVE Z 74-41OHightay 111 Palm Desert,Ca. 92260 (760) 346-7481 JOB NO. 10-100028 EXHIBITA.DWG Traffic Impact Analysis Report• Village Continuing Care Retirement Communiti September 15, 1999 Paec 17 TABLE 7 EXISTING-PLUS-FUTURE PROJECTS-PLUS PROPOSED PROJECT PEAK HOUR LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) INTERSECTION A.M. A.M. P.M. P.M. DELAY LOS DELAY LOS (sec/veh) (sec/veh) Highway 111 @ Parkview Drive/ 10.2 B 10.9 B Painter's Path Highway 111 @ Fred Waring Drive 20.5 C 28.7 D Fred Waring Drive @ Town Center 13.9 B 17.9 C Way/One Quail Place Fred Waring Drive @ Monterey Avenue 18.3 C 21.0 C Monterey Avenue @ Parkview Drive/ 12.1 B 12.1 C COD Entrance As shown on Table 7, the intersections are forecast to operate at an acceptable LOS (LOS C or better) during the morning peak hours under the existing-plus-future projects-plus-proposed project scenario. Three of the intersections are forecast to operate at an acceptable LOS during the afternoon peak hour under the existing-plus-future projects-plus-project scenario. During the afternoon peak hour the intersection of Monterey Avenue at Parkview Drive/COD Entrance the LOS changed from "B" to "C", and the intersection of Highway 111 at Fred Waring Drive the LOS remained at "D", which does not meet the City's performance objective. The intersection of Highway 111 at Fred Waring Drive LOS is "D" under the existing-plus-future projects scenario and remained at "D" under existing-plus-future projects-plus-proposed project scenario during the afternoon peak hour. The LOS remained at "D"since the intersection peak hour volumes were increased by 13 vehicles (or 0.0023%) due to the proposed project. PARKVIEW DRIVE ANALYSIS The City of Palm Desert requested to address the average daily traffic, capacity and Level-Of- Service on Parkview Drive from Highway 111 to Monterey Avenue for the existing, existing- plus-future and existing-plus-future-plus-project conditions. Existing ADT The City of Palm Desert provided March1998 and May 1999 daily traffic volumes for Parkview Drive. Table 8 shows the 1998 and 1999 daily traffic volumes. The existing average daily traffic (ADT) was determined by taking the average of the two volumes. JN 20-100028 1 Traffic Impact Analysis Repor :o Village Continuing Care Retirement Commun September 15. 1999 Page 18 The existing ADT is shown on Table 8. Detailed traffic count data is shown in the Appendix TABLE 8 EXISTING ADT INTERSECTION EB W/B TOTAL DAILY DAILY VOLUMES VOLUMES Highway 111 @ Parkview Drive 742 2239 2981 Monterey Avenue @ Parkview 3148 2630 5778 Drive 1998/1999 ADT 1945 2435 4380 Existing-Plus-Future Projects ADT A three percent growth rate per year was used to forecast traffic generated by future projects that will impact Parkview Drive. The year analysed under future projects is 2010. Table 9 shows the ADT volumes for the existing-plus-future projects conditions for Parkview Drive. TABLE 9 EXISTING-PLUS-FUTURE PROJECTS ADT INTERSECTION E/B W/B TOTAL DAILY DAILY VOLUMES VOLUMES Highway Ill n Parkview Drive 1027 3099 4126 Monterey Avenue @ Parkview 4358 3641 7999 Drive • 2010 ADT 2693 3370 6063 Existing-Plus-Future Projects-Plus-Project ADT As indicated on Table 6, the proposed Assisted Living/Skilled Nursing Building is forecast to generate 321 daily trips and the Retirement Residential Community is forecast to generate 891 daily trips for a total of 1212 daily trips. JN 20-100028 Traffic Impact Analysis Report )Village Continuing Care Retirement Communit September 15. 1999 Page 19 Exhibit 12 indicates that ten percent to the project trips generated by the Assisted Living/Skilled Nursing Building will be traveling via Parkview Drive. Exhibit 13 indicates that seventy percent of the project trips generated by the Retirement Residential Community will be traveling via Parkview Drive. The forecast project ADT on Parkview Drive is shown on Table 10. TABLE 10 PARKVIEW DRIVE FORECAST PROJECT ADT LOCATION E/B W/B TOTAL PARKVIEW DRIVE DAILY DAILY VOLUMES VOLUMES Skilled Nursing/Assisted Living 32 32 64 (10%) Retirement Residential 356 268 624 Community(70%) ADT 388 300 688 As shown on Table 10, the project is forecast to generate approximately 688 trips on Parkview Drive. Table 11 shows the forecast ADT volumes for the existing-plus-future projects-plus-project conditions for Parkview Drive. TABLE 11 EXISTING-PLUS-FUTURE PROJECTS-PLUS-PROJECT ADT INTERSECTION E/B W/B TOTAL DAILY DAILY VOLUMES VOLUMES Highway Ill @ Parkview Drive 2693 3370 6063 Monterey Avenue @ Parkview 388 300 688 Drive ADT 3081 3670 6751 IN 20-100028 I%\ Traffic Impact Analysis Report !o Village Continuing Care Retirement Communi September 15, 1999 Page 20 According to the City of Palm Desert General Plan Transportation Circulation Element, Parkview Drive is a secondary roadway designated to carry 26,000 vehicles when improved to a four lane roadway and operate at a LOS of"C". Presently, Parkview Drive is a two lane roadway. The City of Palm Desert General Plan Transportation Circulation Element indicates that for a two lane road operating at a LOS of"C" the maximum capacity is 10,000 vehicles. As shown on Table 11, under existing-plus-future projects-plus-project conditions, the forecast ADT on Parkview Drive will be approximately 6,751 which is below the maximum roadway capacity for a two lane road. Therefore, Parkview Drive is forecast to operate at an acceptable LOS (LOS C or better) under existing-plus-future projects-plus-proposed project conditions. PARKING DEMAND To determine the number of parking spaces generated by the proposed Assisted Living/Skilled Nursing and Retirement Residential Community, the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Parking Generation Manual (2' Edition) parking generation rates were utilized. The parking generation rates for the proposed Assisted Living/Skilled Nursing Building were obtained from the ITE Parking Generation Manual Land Use 620 (Nursing Home). The trip generation rates for the proposed Retirement Residential Community were obtained from the ITE Parking Generation Manual Land Use 250 (Retirement Community). It should be noted that both generation rates were derived from small number of studies and sample size. Table 12 shows ITE parking generation rates utilized to forecast parking spaces generated by the proposed Assisted Living/Skilled Nursing and Retirement Residential Community. TABLE 12 PASEO VILLAGE ITE PARKING GENERATION RATES LAND USE PARKING RATE Assisted Living!Skilled Nursing- 0.28/Room 99 Occupied Beds Retirement Residential Community- 0.27/Dwelling Unit 256 Dwelling Units JN 20-100028 Traffic Impact Analysis Report- Village Continuing Care Retirement Communit} September 15, 1999 Page 21 Table 13 summarizes the number of parking spaces generated by the proposed project utilizing ITE parking generation rates shown on Table 12. TABLE 13 PASEO VILLAGE FORECAST NUMBER OF PEAK PARKING SPACES LAND USE NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES Assisted Living/Skilled Nursing* - 14 99 Occupied Beds Retirement Residential Community- 69 256 Dwelling Units TOTAL 83 NOTE: *Based on 50 rooms(2 beds per unit) Table 14 shows City of Palm Desert parking requirements for Senior Housing Overlay District. TABLE 14 CITY OF PALM DESERT PARKING GENERATION RATES LAND USE PARKING RATE Assisted Living/Skilled Nursing* - 1/Unit 99 Occupied Beds Retirement Residential Community- 1/Dwelling Unit age 62 and Over, 256 Dwelling,Units NOTE: *Based on 50 rooms(2 beds per unit) Table 15 summarizes the number of parking spaces generated by the proposed project utilizing the City of Palm Desert parking requirements for Senior Housing Overlay District. JN 20-100028 • }4 Traffic Impact Analysis Report )Village Continuing Care Retirement Communit September 15. 1999 Page 22 TABLE 15 PASEO VILLAGE FORECAST NUMBER OF PEAK PARKING SPACES* LAND USE NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES Assisted Living/Skilled Nursing- 99 Occupied Beds 50 (2 beds/unit and 1parking space/unit) Retirement Residential Community- 256 256 Dwelling Units (1 parking space/dwelling unit) TOTAL 306 NOTE: *Based on City of Palm Desert Senior Housing Overlay District Chapter 25.52 The proposed Paseo Village-Retirement Residential Community will provide a combination of above and underground parking. The breakdown of above/underground parking are as follows: Above Parking - 114 spaces Underground Parking - 318 spaces Underground parking will serve primarily residents. The Community Center will use some spaces for valet parking (33 spaces)..Each residential building will be provided with an access to the underground parking area. The above parking area adjacent to the residential buildings and the community center will be designated guest parking/employee parking. The parking area fronting the Assisted Living/Skilled Nursing Building will be designated guest parking. Employee parking will be provided adjacent to the building. No underground parking will be provided for the Assisted Living/Skilled Nursing Building. The number of parking spaces that will be provided for the Assisted Living/Skilled Nursing Building are as follows: Above Parking - Guest Parking - 34 spaces Employee Parking - 18 spaces Based on information provided by Mr. Charlie Sweet, the Assisted Living/Skilled Nursing Building will required approximately 30 employees per day. Assuming three eight-hour shifts per day, and the majority of employees will work from 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. the number of employees on the morning shift will be approximately as follows: - 20 employees JN 20-100028 • ' Traffic Impact Analysis Report• Village Continuing Care Retirement Community September 15, 1999 Page 23 Table 16 summarizes the number of parking spaces to be generated by the employees of the Assisted Living/Skilled Nursing Building. It is estimated that on a eight-hour shift about eighty percent of the employees will drive their own vehicle and twenty percent will travel by another mode of transportation (car pool, bus, etc...). TABLE 16 PASEO VILLAGE ASSISTED LIVING/SKILLED NURSING FORECAST NUMBER OF EMPLOYEE PARKING SPACES LAND USE NUMBER OF EMPLOYEE PARKING SPACES Assisted Living/Skilled Nursing Building- (30 employees/day) 16 80%of 20 employees/8-hour shift with a vehicle Table 17 summarizes the number of parking spaces that will be provided by the project. and the number of parking spaces generated by the proposed Paseo Village-Assisted Living/Skilled Nursing and Retirement Residential Community utilizing ITE parking generation rates, and City of Palm Desert parking requirements. TABLE 17 PASEO VILLAGE FORECAST NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES LAND USE NUMBER OF NUMBER OF NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES PARKING SPACES PARKING SPACES PROVIDED ITE CITY OF PARKING RATES PALM DESERT PARKING RATES Assisted Living/ 52 14 50 Skilled Nursing- 99 Occupied Beds Retirement Residential 432 69 256 Community- 256 Dwelling Units TOTAL 484 83 306 As indicated on Table "17", 484 parking spaces will be provided for the proposed Paseo Village- Assisted Living/Skilled Nursing and Retirement Residential Community. Based on the City of Palm Desert parking requirements, the total number of parking spaces required is 306. Therefore, JN 20-100028 Traffic Impact Analysis Report )Village Continuing Care Retirement Communit September 15. 1999 Page 24 178 additional parking spaces will be provided by the proposed project. As indicated, the Community Center will provide thirty-three spaces for valet parking. The Community Center must comply with the Palm Desert Municipal Code Chapter 10.50 "Valet Parking" for valet parking operations. ON-SITE CIRCULATION The proposed Paseo Village-Assisted Living/Skilled Nursing and Retirement Residential Community will have two driveways fronting Fred Waring Drive. The easterly driveway will serve as an entrance and the westerly driveway will serve as an exit. These driveways will serve primarily visitors and employees for the Assisted Living/Skilled Nursing Building. Access to the residential buildings will be allowed by providing an access road easterly of the Assisted Living/Skilled Nursing Building. Another driveway will be provided at Parkview Drive that will serve as an entrance/exit. This driveway will be primarily used by residents living in the Retirement Residential Community. Emergency fire access driveways will be provided at Park View Drive and at Fairhaven Drive. These driveways will be gated driveways that will serve only emergency vehicles. In order to provide adequate circulation within the Retirement Residential Community, on-site traffic circulation shall be allowed in two directions. Proper signage shall be provided at the two main entrances indicating location of specific buildings and designated parking areas. Vehicles entering from both entrances should be allowed to continue to the designated parking and pick-up/drop-off area. Proper signage should be posted indicating pick-up/drop-off area. Pick-up and drop-off locations shall be properly marked. Delivery/trash pick-up trucks shall be allowed to enter/exit from Fred Waring Drive and Parkview Drive. Access road shall accommodate delivery/trash pick-up trucks. Although no access will be provided from Fairhaven Drive, no parking signs shall be posted on the west side of the street fronting the proposed project to discourage usage of the residential streets. The emergency driveway at Fairhaven Drive shall be used for emergency purposes only. Employees or residents shall not be allowed to enter/exit the property at any time. The following items should be considered for the proposed Paseo Village: - Proposed curb returns shall have a minimum radius of 35 feet. - Proper signage and striping shall be provided at the driveways fronting Fred Waring JN 20-100028 • Traffic Impact Analysis Report- Village Continuing Care Retirement Community September 15. 1999 Page 25 Drive indicating one-way traffic. - Stop sign and right-turn-only sign shall be provided at the easterly driveway fronting Fred Waring Drive. - Stop sign shall be provided at the driveway fronting Parkview Drive. - Parking stalls for disabled persons shall be provided at the front of the Assisted Living/Skilled Nursing Building. - Parking stalls for disabled persons shall be provided at the front of the Community Center Building and for each of the residential buildings. - Assisted Living/Skilled Nursing employee parking shall be provided near the building. - Parking shall not be allowed along the access road. Curb along access road shall be painted red. - No parking signs shall be posted along the west side of Fairhaven Drive fronting the proposed project. - Parkview Drive shall be striped to provide a westbound left turn lane for vehicles entering the proposed project. The following items should also be considered: - Parkway landscaping or monument signing along_ Fred Waring Drive and Parkview Drive should not impede or restrict the sight distance of vehicles exiting the site. - The proposed emergency driveways at Parkview Drive (west end of the property) and Fairhaven Drive should be used only for emergency purposes only. Proper signs should be posted and the driveway should be gated to prohibit other usage. JN 20-100028 4(1 APPENDIX "A " o' EXISTING PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENTS VEHICLE COUNTS FOR: - Highway 111 @ Parkview Drive/Painter's Path - Highway 111 @ Fred Waring Drive - Fred Waring Drive @ Town Center Way/One Quail Place - Fred Waring Drive @ Monterey Avenue - Monterey Avenue @ Parkview Drive/COD Entrance EXISTING DAILY VEHICLE COUNTS FOR: - Highway 111 @ Parkview Drive/Painter's Path - Monterey Avenue @ Parkview Drive/COD Entrance , >• Transportation Studies, Inc. City : Palm Desert 1720 E. Garry Avenue Study Name: H9906062 N/S Direction : Highway 111 Suite 119 Site Code : 00000922 B/W Direction : Park View Drive Santa Ana, CA. 92705 Start Date: 06/23/99 Client : REF & Associates Page : 1 Turning Movements Highway 111 Park View Drive Highway 111 Park View Drive Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Intrvl. Time Right Thru Let_ Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Total 06/23/99 07:00 2 130 5 20 0 1 1 140 0 1 0 1 301 07:15 2 135 5 11 1 2 3 154 0 1 0 0 314 07:30 3 182 11 13 0 0 2 177 0 0 0 2 390 07:45 6 205 13 17 2 1 0 220 0 0 0 1 465 Hour 13 652 34 61 3 4 6 691 0 2 0 4 1470 08:00 4 221 14 19 1 3 1 258 0 2 0 0 523 08:15 5 206 11 19 3 1 3 211 0 0 0 5 464 08:30 2 239 9 24 1 4 3 217 0 0 0 2 501 08:45 2 240 19 21 3 3, 6 221 0 2 2 2 521 Hour 13 906 53 83 8 11 13 907 0 4 2 9 2009 [BREAK] 16:00 7 397 25 34 5 4 6 376 2 0 1 9 866 16:15 10 346 26 23 3 3 7 360 8 2 2 8 798 16:30 14 336 30 28 1 11 9 360 0 1 5 9 804 16:45 15 323 14 27 4 8 8 346 4 1 1 3 754 Hour' 46 1402 95 112 13 26 30 1442 14' 4 9 29 3222 17:00 13 339 32 21 4 5 2 300 3 1 3 7 730 17:15 10 369 25 27 1 6 5 347 3 1 0 9 803 17:30 11 345 34 29 2 5 9 334 9 5 0 5 788 17:45, 7 319 35 20 6 7 4 324 5, 2 4 8 741 Hour 41 1372 126 97 13 23 20 1305 20 9 7 29 3062 Total 113 4332 308 353 37 64 69 4345 34 19 18 71 9763 Apr, 2.3 91.1 6.4 77,7 8.1 14.0 1.5 97.6 0.7 17.5 16.6 65.7 - % Int. 1.1 44.3 3.1 3.6 0.3 0.6 0.7 44.5 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.7 - Transportation Studies, Inc. City : Palm Desert 1720 B. Garry Avenue Study Name: H9906062 N/S Direction : Highway 111 Suite 119 Site Code : 00000922 E/W Direction : Park View Drive Santa Ana, CA. 92705 Start Date: 06/23/99 Client : RBF & Associates Page : 2 Turning Movements Highway 111 Park View Drive Highway 111 Park View Drive Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Intrvl. Time Riaht Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Riaht Thru Left Total Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 07:00 on 06/23/99 to 08:45 on 06/23/99 Time 08:00 08:00 08:00 08:00 Vol. 13 906 53 83 8 11 13 907 0 4 2 9 Pct. 1.3 93.2 5.4 81.3 7.8 10.7 1.4 98.5 0.0 26.6 13.3 60.0 Total 972 102 920 15 High 08:45 08:30 08:00 08:45 Vol. 2 240 19 24 1 4 1 258 0 2 2 2 Total 261 29 259 6 PHF 0.931 0.879 0.888 0.625 Highway 111 13 906 53 999 1971 Park View Drive 21 4— 06/23/99 t_ 83 08:00am 9 08:45ap 8 36 2009 170 2 ^ 11 4 —I, 68 Park View Drive N 1841 T 921 13 907 Highway ill Transportation Studies, Inc. ' City •: Palm Desert 1720 E. Garry Avenue Study Name: H9906062 ' N/S Direction : Highway 111 Suite 119 Site Code : 00000922 E/W Direction : Park View Drive Santa Ana, CA. 92705 Start Date: 06/23/99 Client : RBF & Associates Page : 3 Turning Movements Highway 111 Park View Drive Highway 111 Park View Drive Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Intrvl. Time Right Thru Left, Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Total Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 16:00 on 06/23/99 to 17:45 on 06/23/99 Time 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 Vol. 46 1402 95 112 13 26 30 1442 14 4 9 29 Pct. 2.9 90.8 6.1 74.1 8.6 17.2 2.0 97.0 0.9 9.5 21.4 69.0 Total 1543 151 1486 42 High 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:30 Vol. 7 397 25 34 5 4 6 376 2 1 5 9 Total 429 43 384 15 PHF 0.899 0.877 0.967 0.700 Highway 111 46 1402 95 1583 3126 Park View Drive 73 06/23/99 1= 112 04:00pm 29 '� 04:45pM F--- 13 115 3222 285 9 —> ^ NC- 4 26 -1, -4. 134 Park View Drive N 2918 T f 1432 1442 14 30 Highway 111 1 .,,x 1, Transportation Studies, Inc. • City : Palm Desert 1720 B. Garry Avenue Study Name: E9906058 N/S Direction : Highway 111 Suite 119 Site Code : 00000922 E/W Direction : Fred Waring Drive Santa Ana, CA. 9270S Start Date: 06/23/99 Client : RBF & Associates Page : 1 Turning Movements Highway 111 Fred Waring Drive Highway 111 Fred Waring Drive Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Intrvl Time Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thm Left Total 06/23/99 07:00 1 104 29 35 4 8 10 107 6 1 1 1 307 07:15 5 106 39 44 6 5 S 117 2 1 3 1 334 07:30 2 141 47 61 3 7 4 151 1 1 0 1 419 07:45, 3 193 49 49 6 14 11 202 2 2 3 2 536 Hour 11 544 164 189 19 34 30 577 11 5 7 5 1596 08:00 4 146 42 58 14 16 14 164 9 3 4 2 476 08:15 3 156 58 49 6 10 8 135 7 7 2 4 445 08:30 3 143 36 48 5 15 9 158 5 4 2 1 429 08:45 9 178 50 40 13 13 13 171 8 1 8 5 509 Hour 19 623 186I 195 38 54 44 628 29 15 16 12 1859 [BREAK! 16:00 8 220 92 69 30 47 30 205 10 8 20 22 761 16:15, 24 230 62 48 29 31 25 284 11 14 23 18 799 16:301 14 228 88 58 21 39 36 230 8 12 28 30 792 16:451 14 240 96 60 36 34 32 247 10 11 20 17 817 Hour 60 918 338' 235 116 151 123 966 39 45 91 87 3169 17:00 17 224 87 51 31 45 23 293 10 10 32 26 849 17:151 16 244 103 51 19 36 46 319 7 8 31 11 891 17:30 14 202 821 60 30 38 32 288 11 6 32 20 - 815 17:45 17 210 571 52 37 50 22 270 9 10 36 12 782 Hour 64 880 3291 214 117 169 123 1170 37 34 131 69 ' 3337 Total1 154 2965 1017 833 290 408 320 3341 116 99 245 173 9961 % Apr. 3.7 71.6 24.5 54.4 18.9 26.6 8.4 88.4 3.01 19.1 47.3 33.4 - % Int. 1.5 29.7 10.2 8.3 2.9 4.0 3.2 33.5 1.1 0.9 2.4 1.7 - TTT fitemOTH Zb EZ 6S9 60L EEbT N aniaa 6uzaeM paa3 8EZ "L 9T SS = N TT 8ZS 988T £0T TE we0E:80 6 weSb:LO 1702 -1, 66/EZ/90 .� L9 ani.xa .6uTaeM paaA 80LT T ZL8 S8T ET 8E9 ITT fieMQbiH Z69'0 Ib8'0 EZ8'0 ES8'0 dHd ET S1Z 88 StZ Teloy fi Z l Z ZOZ 11 9T fir 8S 6t E6I E 'IOA SI:80 St:LO 00:80 St:LO 115TH 9E tZL 06Z 9E8 relay 0'SZ S'OE 1'b) I'E 0'T6 8'S 6'81 9'0T E'OL i'ZZ E'9L S'I 'la(1 6 1i 91 EZ 6S9 Z3 SS IE fi0Z SST 8E9 EI 'i°A S3:LO Sb:LO S4:LO Sb:LO amty 66/EZ/90 uo St:60 01 66/EZ/90 uo 00:L0 :Potiad aql io; uotlOasialul aitlug dg stsdieuy nog )(ad ieloy l;aq ni 1gDta 1;a1 nlgy 10ta 1;a1 nigy 1g6ta 1;a1 nigy 146Ta army 'TAIlwI lief$ punogiseg punoggliow punoglsaM punogginoS aATIQ ButleM paid TIT AsAtIETH anuQ Batley paid ITT A Ag6Tg sluamanow 5utuiny Z : abed saletoossy dgg : Nam 66/EZ/90 :aleQ lIalS SOLZ6 'VD 'Pull awes ;ATIQ 6uTIEM paid : uOTIOaiTQ M/a ZZ600000 : 4o0 altS 611 altnS III dexgbtg : uotloaitQ S/H 8509066H :anti ApnlS anuaAY ALM '8 OZLT liasaa lied AiTO •ouI 'satpnis uotleliodsaeiy Transportation Studies, Inc. City : Palm Desert 1720 E. Garry Avenue Study Name: 'H9906058. N/S Direction : Highway 111 Suite 119 Site Code : 00000922 E/W Direction : Fred Waring Drive Santa Ana, CA. 92705 Start Date: 06/23/99 Client : RBF & Associates Page : 3 Turning Movements Highway 111 Fred Waring Drive Highway 111 Fred Waring Drive Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Intrvl. Time Right Thru Left, Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Riaht Thru Left Total Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 16:00 on 06/23/99 to 17:45 on 06/23/99 Time 16:45 16:45 16:45 16:45 Vol. 61 910 368 222 116 153 133 1147 38 35 115 74 Pct. 4.5 67.9 27.4 45.2 23.6 31.1 10.0 87.0 2.8 15.6 51.3 33.0 Total 1339 491 1318 224 High 17:15 16:45 17:15 17:00 Vol. 16 244 103 60 36 34 46 319 7 10 32 26 Total 363 130 372 68 PEP 0.922 0.944 0.885 0.823 Highway 111 61 910 368 1443 4 , 4 T 2782 Fred Waring Drive 215 06/23/99 1- 222 74 05:30pM E-- 116 439 3372 1107 115 / 153 35 1' -÷ 616 Fred Waring Drive N 2416 T 1098 38 1147 133 Highway 111 Transportation Studies, Inc. City : Palm Desert 1720 E. Garry Avenue Study Name: H9906059 N/S Direction : Town Center Way Suite 119 Site Code : 00000922 E/W Direction : Fred Waring Drive Santa Ana, CA. 92705 Start Date: 06/22/99 Client : REF & Associates Page : 1 Turning Movements Town Center Way Fred Waring Drive Town Center Way Fred Waring Drive Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Intrvl. Time Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left, Right Thru Left Total 06/22/99 07:00 3 0 2 1 61 18 11 1 10 18 26 1 152 07:15 1 0 8 2 34 19 9 2 6 5 39 2 127 07:30 2 4 7 2 51 16 14 0 3 8 42 1 150 07:45 3 4 2 2 82 22 8 0 5 9 19 2 178 Hour 9 8 19 7 228 75 42 3 24 40 146 6 607 08:00 3 3 2 5 73 30 27 1 3 10 59 0 216 08:15 3 3 2 4 70 36 13 2 9 8 56 3 209 08:30 3 1 5 3 78 34 19 0 4 17 44 1 209 08:45 0 3 3 0 71 33 26 3 8 21 42 0 210 Hour 9 10 12 12 292 133 85 6 24 56 201 4 844 [BREAK] 16:00 4 3 4 3 95 40 47 7 37 31 112 2 385 16:15 4 0 3 5 72 25 49 9 39 34 119 6 365 16:30 4 3 5 10 107 36 39 3 49 34 135 5 430 16:45 4 2 5 11 112 33 36 8 40 23 107 71 388 Hour' 16 8 17 29 386 134 171 27 165 122 473 20 1568 17:0 2 4 2 4 93 34 34 3 41 29 121 6 373 17:15 5 2 6 6 119 44 52 2 40 28 132 5 441 17:30 3 7 6 4 98 50 38 5 48 33 115- 4 411 17:45, 4 4 5, 8 101 32 38 3 36 19 147 9, 406 Hour 14 17 19 22 411 160 162 13 165 109 515 24 1631 Total 48 43 67 70 1317 502 460 49 378 327 1335 54 4650 % Apr. 30.3 27.2 42.4 3.7 69.7 26.5 51.8 5.5 42.6 19.0 77.7 3.1 - % Int. 1.0 0.9 1.4 1.5 28.3 10.7 9.8 1.0 8.1 7.0 28.7 1.1 - kCIK FeM as;uap uMo1 S8 bZ 9 66T 4 1 4 T 6TE N aniaa buia€M paaj 86Z E— "L 9S CET TOE SEL 1b8 98S Z6Z --+ weSb:80 sy' b we00:80 _ ZT —I, 66/ZZ/98 -4 SZE an!aa suiaeM paaj _ ES 1 T f ZT 6 ZZ 0T r em as;uaol umoI S66'0 LLL'0 0S61 T98'0 Lid 69 LE SIT 6 Te201 0 6S OT 8 E 9Z tE 8L E S I E 'T0A 00:80 Sb:80 OE:80 OE:80 gbr I9Z SIT LE'v IE Tel% S'I 0'LL VIZ 8'OZ Z'S 6'EL FOE 8'99 L'Z L'8E Z'ZE 0'6Z ';od t TOZ 9S 4Z 9 S8 EET Z6Z ZT ZI OT 6 'T0A 00:80 00:80 00:80 00:80 awry 66/ZZ/90 uo S6:80 01 66/ZZ/90 u0 OO:LO :Potlad agi I0; ucTloasIalni aITlug Ag STsLTEUy Inog )(Pad Tnoy 1;a1 nigy 46ra ;;aq nlgy agbtg 1;a7 nlgy 7116r8 7;a1 nlgy 11.16rg army 'TAlluI IIe;S panoglseg punogqpog punogasaM punomnog aATJa burieM paid AEI Nino uAoy anTIQ buTiaN paid AeM Iaauaj uAoy sluamanow butulny l abed salEToossy 4 al! : 7uarTJ 66/ll/90 :ilea 1Ie1S S0LZ6 'YO 'euy ewes aATIQ buTIEM paid : uoTipaITQ M/a ZZ600000 : apo3 airs 6i1 alTnS ,eey Iaivap DMm' : uoraoaiTQ s/N 6S09066H :a®eg dpn1S anaany Lin 'g OlLI liasaa mud : d7?0 'oUI 'sarpnas uotaelIodsaely Transportation Studies, Inc. City Palm Desert 1720 E. Garry Avenue Study Name: H9906059 NIS Direction : Town Center Way _ Suite 119 Site Code : 00000922 E/W Direction : Fred Waring Drive Santa Ana, CA. 92705 Start Date: 06/22/99 Client : RBF & Associates Page : 3 Turning Movements Town Center Way Fred Waring Drive Town Center Way Fred Waring Drive Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Intrvl. Time Richt Thru _,eft_ Right Thru Left Right Thru Left, Right Thru Left Total Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 16:00 on 06/22/99 to 17:45 on 06/22/99 Time 16:30 16:30 16:30 16:30 Vol. 15 11 18 31 431 147 161 16 170 114 495 23 Pct. 34.0 25.0 40.9 5.0 70.7 24.1 46.3 4.6 48.9 18.0 78.3 3.6 Total 44 609 347 632 High 17:15 17:15 17:15 16:30 Vol. 5 2 6 6 119 44 52 2 40 34 135 5 Total 13 169 94 174 PHF 0.846 0.900 0.922 0.908 Town Center Way 11 70 15 18 114 Fred Waring Drive 616 *— 06/22/99 t— 31 04:38pM 23 �` 85:15pM - 431 1248 1632 1283 147 495 /'\ 114 —4• - 674 Fred Waring Drive N 619 El T f 272 16 170 161 Town Center Way Transportation Studies, Inc. City : Palm Desert 1720 E. Garry Avenue Study Name: H990606.0 N/S Direction : Monterey Avenue Suite 119 Site Code : 00000922 H/W Direction : Fred Waring Drive Santa Ana, CA. 92705 Start Date: 06/23/99 Client : REF & Associates Page : 1 Turning Movements Monterey Avenue Fred Waring Drive Monterey Avenue Fred Waring Drive Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Intrvl. Time Right_ Thru Left Richt Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Total 06/23/99 07:00 9 73 27 21 72 27 15 38 8 7 39 8 344 07:15 10 59 29 33 56 34 16 46 8 5 45 14 355 07:30 14 81 25 35 63 25 17 57 6 4 40 18 385 07:45 9 78 31. 53 77 31 24 85 9' 5 60 14 476 Hour 42 291 112 142 268 117 72 226 31' 21 184 54 1560 08:00 20 122 52 41 117 42 37 60 16 6 51 11 575 08:15 24 91 45 34 97 38 25 48 10 18 44 15 489 08:30 22 95 34 37 103 35 27 66 14 10 47 9 499 08:45 30 107 50, 28 93 38 27 59 11, 15 52 19 529 Hour 96 415 181 140 410 153 116 233 51 49 194 54 2092 [BREAK] 16:00 32 102 37 49 87 67 43 121 13 15 115 42 723 16:15 36 112 34 55 85 48 74 152 20 20 122 40 798 16:30 40 114 45 53 92 54 72 115 34 20 125 37 801 16:45 32 110 57 48 107 44, 37 125 18 19 127 27_ 751 Hour 140 438 173' 205 371 213! 226 513 85 74 489 146 3073 17:00 31 102 46 39 92 49 51 147 25 15 139 41 777 17:15 30 113 42 65 110 59 58 147 19 22 162 52 879 17:30 44 133 54 1- 52 114 42 73 118 17 16 135 41 839 j7:45 36 94 53! 42 109 '49 67 147 14 t2 124 48 795 Hour 141 442 195 198 425 199 249 559 75 65 560 182 3290 Total 419 1586 661 685 1474 682 663 1531 242 209 1427 436 10015 o Apr. 15.7 59.4 24.7 24.1 51.8 24.0 27.2 62.8 9.9 10.0 68.8 21.0 - Int. 4.1 15.8 6.6 6.8 14.7 6.8 6.6 15.2 2.4 2.0 14.2 4.3 - Transportation Studies, Inc. City :'Palm Desert 1720 E. Garry Avenue Study Name: H9906060 N/S Direction : Monterey Avenue _ Suite 119 Site Code : 00000922 E/W Direction : Fred Waring Drive Santa Ana, CA. 92705 Start Date: 06/23/99 Client : RBF 6 Associates Page : 2 Turning Movements Monterey Avenue Fred Waring Drive Monterey Avenue Fred Waring Drive Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Intrvl. Time Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Total Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 07:00 on 06/23/99 to 08:45 on 06/23/99 Time 08:00 08:00 08:00 08:00 Vol. 96 415 181 140 410 153 116 233 51 49 194 54 Pct. 13.8 59.9 26.1 19.9 58.3 21.7 29.0 58.2 12.7 16.4 65.3 18.1 Total 692 703 400 297 High 08:00 08:00 08:00 08:45 Vol. 20 122 52 41 117 42 37 60 16 15 52 19 Total 194 200 113 86 PHF 0.891 0.878 0.884 0.863 Monterey Avenue 96 415 181 427 4 T 1119 Fred Waring Drive 557 <— 86/23/99 T-- 140 88:00am 54 08:45aM f- 410 854 2892 1194 194 47 153 49 —T - 491 Fred Waring Drive N 1817 T i 617 233 51 116 Monterey Avenue Transportation Studies, Inc. City : Palm Desert 1720 B. Garry Avenue Study Name: H9906060 N/S Direction : Monterey Avenue Suite 119 Site Code : 00000922 B/W Direction : Fred Waring Drive Santa Ana, CA. 92705 Start Date: 06/23/99 Client : RBF & Associates Page : 3 Turning Movements Monterey Avenue Fred Waring Drive Monterey Avenue Fred Waring Drive Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Intrvl. Time Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Total Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 16:00 on 06/23/99 to 17:45 on 06/23/99 Time 17:00 17:00 17:00 17:00 Vol. 141 442 195 198 425 199 249 559 75 65 560 182 Pct. 18.1 56.8 25.0 24.0 51.7 24.2 28.1 63.3 8.4 8.0 69.3 22.5 Total 778 822 883 807 High 17:30 17:15 17:45 17:15 Vol. 44 133 54 65 110 59 67 147 14 22 162 52 Total 231 234 228 236 PHF 0.841 0.878 0.968 0.854 Monterey Avenue 141 442 195 939 4 1 4 T 1717 Fred Waring Drive 641 <-' 06/23/99 t- 198 182 2` 05:45pM 425 1448 3290 1826 560 ^ „- 199 65 —I, 3 1004 Fred Waring Drive N 1589 4 1 T 14 706 559 ?5 249 Monterey Avenue • Transportation Studies, Inc. ''' City : Palm Desert 1720 E. Garry Avenue Study Name: H9906061 ' N/S Direction : Monterey Avenue Suite 119 Site Code : 00000922 E/W Direction : Park View Drive Santa Ana, CA. 92705 Start Date: 06/24/99 Client : RBF & Associates Page : 1 Turning Movements Monterey Avenue Park View Drive Monterey Avenue Park View Drive Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Intrvl. Time Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Total 06/24/99 07:00 14 101 10 3 1 0 1 60 10 17 8 11 236 07:15 7 81 26 1 0 1 7 58 19 12 9 4 225 07:30 7 106 57 2 4 0 17 71 16 10 32 4 326 07:45 9 96 27 5 0 1 5 109 17, 11 17 17 314 Hour 37 384 120 11 5 2 30 298 62 50 66 36 1101 08:00 16 175 49 10 5 3 11 103 25 19 13 14 443 08:15 14 148 43 9 2 6 2 112 14 13 12 9 384 08:30 13 156 11 6 3 3 4 99 11 14 5 15 340 08:45 9 159 27 5 3 4 4 96 11 5 6 17, 346 Hour 52 638 130 30 13 16 21 410 61 51 36 55 1513 [BREAK] 16:C0( 13 195 5 6 3 1 5 188 16 22 3 16 473 16:151 19 159 3 10 5 4 2 166 221 27 4 18 439 16:30i 18 181 10 15 3 11 5 249 171 12 6 19 546 16:45! 12 136 5 20 8 10 8 193 14 16 1 17 490 Hour! 62 721 231 51 19 26 20 796 69' 77 14 70 1948 17:00 15 164 17 17 2 2 5 197 25 19 8 30 501 17:15i 18 200 8 30 5 5 3 211 8 26 5 24 543 17:30 -16 190 19 15 3 3 3 192 16 23 7 17 504 17:45 18 180 29 5 10 5 9 215 14 15 8 20 528 Hour' 67 734 73 67 20 15 20 815 63 83 28 91 2076 Total 218 2477 346 159 57 59 91 2319 255 261 144 252 6638 Apr. 7.1 81.4 11.3 57,9 20.7 21.4! 3.4 87.0 9.5 39.7 21.9 38.3 - % Int. 3.2 37.3 5.2 2.3 0.8 0.81 1.3 34.9 3.8 3.9 2.1 3.7 - 9_ok Transportation Studies, Inc. City : Palm Desert 1720 B. Garry Avenue Study Name: H9906061' N/S Direction : Monterey Avenue Suite 119 Site Code : 00000922 E/W Direction : Park View Drive Santa Ana, CA. 92705 Start Date: 06/24/99 Client : REF & Associates Page : 2 Turning Movements Monterey Avenue Park View Drive Monterey Avenue Park View Drive Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Intrvl. Time , Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru_ Left Right Thru Lift Total Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 07:00 on 06/24/99 to 08:45 on 06/24/99 Time 08:00 08:00 08:00 08:00 Vol. 52 638 130 30 13 16 21 410 61 51 36 55 Pct. 6.3 77.8 15.8 50.8 22.0 27.1 4.2 83.3 12.3 35.9 25.3 38.7 Total 820 59 492 142 High 08:00 08:00 08:00 08:00 Vol. 16 175 49 10 5 3 11 103 25 19 13 14 Total 240 18 139 46 PHF 0.854 0.819 0.884 0.771 Monterey Avenue 52 638 130 495 1315 Park View Drive 126 06/24/99 t_ 30 08:00am 55 08:45aM - 13 268 1513 246 16 36 51 —* 187 Park View Drive N 1197 ' T r 705 410 61 21 Monterey Avenue Transportation Studies, Inc. ' City ° Palm Desert 1720 B. Garry Avenue Study Name: H9906061 • N/S Direction : Monterey Avenue Suite 119 Site Code : 00000922 B/W Direction : Park View Drive Santa Ana, CA. 92705 Start Date: 06/24/99 Client : RBF & Associates Page : 3 Turning Movements Monterey Avenue Park View Drive Monterey Avenue Park View Drive Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Intrvl. Time Right Thru Left., Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Total Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 16:00 on 06/24/99 to 17:45 on 06/24/91 Time 16:30 16:30 16:30 16:30 Vol. 63 731 40 82 18 28 21 850 64 73 20 90 Pct. 7.5 87.6 4.7 64.0 14.0 21.8 2.2 90.9 6.8 39.8 10.9 49.1 Total 834 128 935 183 High 17:15 17:15 16:30 17:00 Vol. 18 200 8 30 5 5 5 249 17 19 8 30 Total 226 40 271 57 PHF 0.922 0.800 0.862 0.802 Monterey Avenue 63 731 40 1022 1856 Park View Drive 145 06/24/99 t_ 82 04:30pM - 90 85:15pM f- 18 328 2080 209 28 ^ N 28 73 —4, 81 Park View Drive N 1767 4, 1 T 14 832 850 64 21 Monterey Avenue '` A 1 t , - :'Is.i .nd .arw Tia:e1C Say.us.riity Dept. iLL. crud. ,:eba:e S,.•- TDC-8 73-510 Prod Waring Or. Start Daci: 134/22i99 Counted by: P►ln Deser, Ca. 92240 Pilo I.D. : FR_+^wAR7 Page : 1 Vobi cle group 1 Ctace Hwy 111 !Prod Waring Dr 'State Hvy 111 'Fred Wer.rg Dr I Souchbouad 'Westbound 'Northbound r I I J..a.;cbound I I I Lase Thru Right Other I Left Thru Right Cher I Left Thru Right Ocher I Lett Thru Right Ocher I Total Mite 04/22/99 09:00 50 117 2 0 1 9 14 92 0 1 7 229 4 0 1 4 2 4 0 614 C8:15 31 116 4 0 I 7 12 74 0 1 7 111 9 0 I 5 3 5 o f 542 38:10 90 194 9 0 I 11 16 52 0 1 9 168 7 0 I 5 4 3 0 1 578 28745 67 242 5 0 1 13 10 51 0 1 9 219 13 O 1 '! 9 3 0 1 444 i:r Total 228 629 20 0 I 40 SO 269 0 I 32 822 30 0 I 21 17 15 0 1 2370 • BREAK 11:00 115 306 26 0 41 ' 37 75 0 I 9 222 32 0 1 l8 19 8 0 1 910 11:15 97 286 21 0 I 42 30 88 0 1 13 247 29 0 i 21 26 12 0 I 907 11:30 03 301 29 0 I 49 34 114 0 I 15 252 ' 34 0 I 19 26 11 0 I 987 :1:45 91 331 27 0 I 46 41 7S 0 I 23 312 42 0 27 19 15 0 1271 Hr Total 386 1224 103 0 I 140 144 352 0 I 65 1043 137 0 1 45 110 46 0 I 3875 • Eh AK ' 15:00 89 243 21 0 I 37 38 86 C 13 320 33 C 27 31 25 0 966 :4:15 122 288 16 3 I .. 29 75 C 9 311 36 0 I 21 38 17 0 I 1314 15:30 122 248 19 0 I 46 35 77 0 I 23 363 23 C I 19 22 15 0 I 1019 15.4S 123 259 79 0 I tit 47. 100 0 I 15 299 23 0 I 11 26 13 0 I 1037 li: Tmta: 456 1044 75 0 lY0 143 338 0 I 57 1293 125 0 99 117 70 0 4006 -TOTAL. 1070 3097 198 0 I 410 337 959 0 I 154 3163 292 0 I 204 244 131 0 I 14251 :14::. ..nd Watt& Tte::.c tsI maet.ug CapL. atls L.J. . .:azJ:3oid T2C+9. - 73-510 Pied Waring Dr. Sta.t Cite: 04/14/99 • Courted byi Palm Desert. Ca. 62260 Pile Z.D. : PRELIGU! Page . venicle group 1 Onc Ouall Place 'Fred Raring Dr 'Town Center Way (Fred Wring Dr 1 $euGhbound IRestbound INor=h cund 'eastbound I I I 1 1 Lett Thri Right Other I Lzet Thru Right Ocher I Left Thin Riahc ether I :.eft Th_u Right Other 1 Toed Site 04/14/99 ................................................................................^.......... 09:30 6 8 4 0 1 .!S 11 4 0 1 2 3 13 0 1 1 49 13 0 : 236 04:15 8 0 6 0 1 19 77 2 0 13 1 22 0 I 0 S4 12 0 I 231 72:30 2 2 1 0 1 29 76 3 0 10 1 15 0 1 64 27 0 1 230 09:45 4 5 3 n I 52 9N 3 0 1 15 1 24 0 1 2_ F1 2A 0 1 244 iir :0cal 20 15 14 0 1 155 350 12 0 - 37 6 73 0 I 4 2:7 9C 0 I 993 • BR=sK • 11:CC 2 2 3 0 I 54• 117 0 1 51 4 44 0 6 96 36 4 I 421 :1:15 3 0 1 0 1 s7 106 2 0 62 1 61 0 I 3 104 3b 0 1 437 11:30 3 4' 2 1 1 6/ 132 3 0 42 4 49 0 1 4 103 44 0 1 447 11:45 4 2 3 3 1 4: 129 5 0 1 53 3 62 0 1 5 115 30 0 1 461 tir Total 12 8 9 1 I 203 485 12 3 I 214 12 215 0 I 19 418 145 4 I 1756 - 83c.71C - 15:00 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 I 0 15.13 9 . 3 3 59 105 7 C I 54 4 53 0 1 4 1:5 31 0 454 15:33 1C 5 4 0 I 57 123 6 0 56 1 45 0 1 3 143 47 C I 545 15r15 9 3 5 0 I 46 94 6 0 I 51 l 49 n ! 7 13P 26 0 I 436 Rr Tac41 26 9 12 C 152 3:2 19 0 163 6 147 0 I 14 411 134 0 I 1395 16.00 7 3 4 0 37 127 .1 3 I 55 4 53 7 I 7 129 34 0 I 47; :1r Total 7 3 4 0 I 37 137 11 3 I 55 4 53 0 I 3 129 34 0 I 476 •' T?.L• 65 35 39 . I 557 1224 54 0 I 469 23 432 C I 39 1134 363 4 I 4623 1o6 : L,.r And ....tr. Il..r r:.: r.nytrl..criny IN.'rl . ♦•l. ,_..... .,«...,n TDC•i 13.310 Prod Waring Dr. Start ao-....02i_8./99 Caun .d by: Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 Pilc I.D: : MCr"!M ?age _ 1 ' Vehicle group 1 Mc3r 4EY AWL 1 FRED WARINC Da I MCN:SRZY AVE 1 Y3.6: WARSm DR 1 Scuthbound IWeacncund 1Nort!•.bound 13aatbound 1 I I I I Lai- Thra Right Other I Le:: Thru Right CCher 1 Left Thrl Right Other 1 Lef: Thra R:ghc Ocher 1 Tc:41 0aca 02/11/10 08:CC 40 140 15 0 1 45 116 50 0 1 21 109 31 0 1 16 40 8 1 1 532 08:15 34 106 12 0 1 4; 101 33 C 1 10 1C2 2C 0 1 11 643 9 0 I is: 08:30 49 12S 15 1 I 41 89 33 0 1 7 74 22 0 I 12 45 9 0 1 522 09.45 43 153 25 0 I 47 81 44 3 I 14 76 32 0 I 16 49 10 0 I :00 8r 20c41 166 524 67 1 1 171 383 165 3 1 • 52 - 361 105 0 1 55 202 36 _ I 2306 • BREAK • 11:C0 0 0 0 Cl 0. 0 0 0 0 0 O 1 0 0 0 O 1 0 .1:15 47 137 27 1 1 77 ' 134 52 0 1 26 124 23 0 1 49 131 26 0 I 904 11:30 55 179 49 1 1 75 128 4a 1 1 16 131 32 1 1 58 97 14 0 1 884 tl,v, 49 156 42 0 I 37 136 44 n I 28 117 44 n I 44 1.12 20 C ! 919 Mx Tata: 121 522 117 2 1 :39 399 144 1 I 10 372 89 1 I 171 320 60 0 I 2707 12:02 49 213 38 0 I 65 115 43 0 1 21 132 33 0 I 72 122 29 0 I 934 12:15 0 o a 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 C 0 J 0 1 0 0 0 C l 0 12:30 0 0 0 0 l 0 0 0 0 1 C C 0 0 1 C 0 0 0 1 0 12745 C 0 0 C e 0 c C I C 0 0 C c 0 n n l a Hr Tata. 49 219 :a 0 I 65 115 42 0 I 21 13: 33 0 1 72 29 0 934 BREAK • 15:03 3 0 3 0 0 0 C o I 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 I. _0 15:15 42 145 24 0 I 57 147 53 1 I 19 192 39 0 I 59 141 17 0 I 943 15:3J 47 136 30 0 I 63 152 62 3 1 22 133 53 0 1 79 153 25 0 1 1013 15:45 53 .44 :4 0 1 7.7 13C 65 0 I 35 144 1.1 0 I 74 172 23 0 I 1005 Hr Total 148 426 7a 0 :9J 4:.7 134 1 I 30 54: .130 C I 211 471 71 3 I 23:1 14,02 S4 136 33 0 ! 4: 111 41 C r 2. 191 61 C 1 97 167 24 0 I 1032 lir Tn:i Sc 136 33 0 1 61 ___ 6: C I 124 61 0 1 :7 167 24 0 1 1032 =CT.14" 578 1326 333 3 1 'i34 1454 594 5 1 244 1501 413 1 1 596 1222 220 1 1 9940 C:a.r .nd warn Tra__.c 0nginaaring Deist. Si_r Cad. . 1384:S4C. . ' _8 73-510 Fred Waring Cr. Star: Data: 02/17/99 Counted by; P11a Desert, Ca. 12264 F11a Z.D. : MOIT2.RE2 Page : 1 vehicle group 1 MA EREY AVE IPARK VIEW DR 111331=17 AVE 1PARX VIEW DR I Southbouad IWescbound Irorenbound IEeactbounci I I I I 1 Left Thru Right Other I Left Thru Right ether 1 Left T ru Right Other I Lett Thsv Right Other I T0t21 Date 02/17/91 08:00 86 174 19 0 I 4 7 S 0 I 12 114 12 1 1 14 37 18 0 I 503 08:15 25 117 12 0 1 2 4 7 1 I 16 153 12 0 I 14 14 11 0 1 462 00:30 22 114 17 0 I 4 2 5 0 1 13 94 5 0 I 11 6 14 0 1 377 03.45 32 726 15 1 1 4 4 7 C I 19 132 13 0 I 14 20 13 0 I 504 Hr Total. 165 771 63 1 I 14 19 24 1 I 60 493 42 1 1 55 77 56 a I :942 • DREAX • 11:00 0 0 0 0 .I 0• 0 0 0 1 0 a 0 O j 0 0 0 0 1 o 11e15 30 244 14 a I 1.5 18 34 0 i 27 196 7 0 I 23 10 16 0 1 634 11:30 14 249 28 0 I 8 6 11 0 I 13 203 4 1 1 22 3 25 0 1 593 11:45 17 255 17 0 I A 8 9 0 1 17 221 7 1 1 20 4 19 0 I 633 Hr Toca1 61 741 . 59 0 I 31 32 54 0 I 57 626 18 2 I 65 17 60 a I 1130 12:00 16 275 10 0 1 19 8 15 0 I ii 189 6 0 1 13 9 37 0 1 615 12:15 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 1 0 12:30 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 a 0 a 1 0 !.3:45 0 a n 0 1 0 0 n 0 1 2 0 2 3 1 0 0 0 a I 0 ftr Total 15 275 10 0 1 le 8 16 0 18 189 6 0 1 13 9 37 0 1 615 BR4.1X • • 15:00 0- a - 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 a a 0 0 1 . 0 0 0 0 1 0 15:15 20 221 16 0 I 16 12 19 0 I 29 29: :7 a I 26 9 19 0 I 704 15:30 23 213 13 0 I 11 12 23 0 I 25 27i 6 0 I 29 8 26 0 ( 673 15-45 15 251 13 . I' 11 11 23 0 22 132 12 0 I 29 12 22 n I 742 Kr Total 53 685 47 _ I 33 37 91 0 I 75 891 35 0 I 84 29 67 0 I 2.39 16.00 27 229 24 0 10 9 25 0 I 11 120 14 0 I 22 it 25 0 I 748 Kr Total 27 223 24 0 I 10 9 25 0 I 31 320 14 0 I 22 13 25 0 I 74a •T.STAL• 328 2/07 203 2 I 105 210 1 I 241 2512 115 3 1 239 145 245 0 I 1174 EXISTING AM Tue Aug 24, 1999 11:12:12 Page 1-1 PASEO VILLAGE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY EXISTING CONDITIONS AM PEAK Scenario Report Scenario: EXISTING AM Command: EXISTING AM Volume: EXISTING AM Geometry: Default Geometry Impact Fee: Default Impact Fee Trip Generation: Default Trip Generation Trip Distribution: Default Trip Distribution Paths: Default Paths Routes: Default Routes Configuration: EXISTING AM Traffix 7.1.0427 (c) 1998 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RBWF & ASSOC., IRVINE EXISTING AM Tue Aug 24, 1999 11:12:12 Page 2-1 PASEO VILLAGE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY EXISTING CONDITIONS AM PEAK Impact Analysis Report Level Of Service Intersection Base Future Change Del/ V/ Del/ V/ in LOS Veh C LOS Veh C # 1 SR-111/PARK VIEW B 8.8 0.284 B 8.8 0.284 + 0.000 D/V # 2 MONTEREY/PARK VIEW B 11.6 0.357 B 11.6 0.357 + 0.000 D/V # 3 SR-111/FRED WARING C 19.2 0.383 C 19.2 0.383 + 0.000 D/V # 4 TOWN CENTER/FRED WARING B 13.5 0.156 B 13.5 0.156 + 0.000 D/V # 5 MONTEREY/FRED WARING C 18.9 0.295 C 18.9 0.295 + 0.000 D/V Traffix 7.1.0427 (c) 1998 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RBWF & ASSOC., IRVINE ao°1 EXISTING AM Tue Aug 24, 1999 11:12:12 Page 3-1 PASEO VILLAGE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY EXISTING CONDITIONS AM PEAK Level Of Service Computation Report 1994 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #1 SR-111/PARK VIEW Cycle (sec) : 140 Critical Vol./Cap. (X) : 0.284 Loss Time (sec) : 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) : 8.8 Optimal Cycle: 36 Level Of Service: B **********************************************-********************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Lanes: 1 0 3 0 1 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 I II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 5 907 13 53 906 13 9 2 4 11 8 83 Growth Adj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 5 907 13 53 906 13 9 2 4 11 8 83 User Adj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 5 907 13 53 906 13 9 2 4 11 8 83 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 5 907 13 53 906 13 9 2 4 11 8 83 PCE Adj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj : 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol. : 5 998 13 53 997 14 9 2 4 11 8 83 I II II II I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.85 1.00 0.76 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.96 0.96 0.76 Lanes: 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 2.96 0.04 0.60 0.13 0.27 0.58 0.42 1.00 Final Sat. : 1615 5700 1445 1615 5621 79 941 209 418 1056 768 1445 I II II II I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.18 0.0. 0.03 0.18 0.18 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.06 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green Time: 7.0 86.4 86.4 16.2 95.6 95.6 28.4 28.4 28.4 28.4 28.4 28.4 Volume/Cap: 0.06 0.28 0.01 0.28 0.26 0.26 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.28 I II II II I Level Of Service Module: Delay/Veh: 40.9 8.0 6.7 36.8 5.5 5.5 29.0 29.0 29.0 29.1 29.1 30.7 User DelAdj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 40.9 8.0 6.7 36.8 5.5 5.5 29.0 29.0 29.0 29.1 29.1 30.7 DesignQueue: 0 31 0 4 26 0 1 0 0 1 0 5 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.1.0427 (c) 1998 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RBWF & ASSOC., IRVINE EXISTING AM Tue Aug 24, 1999 11:12:12 Page 4-1 PASEO VILLAGE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY EXISTING CONDITIONS AM PEAK Level Of Service Computation Report 1994 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #2 MONTEREY/PARK VIEW Cycle (sec) : 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X) : 0.357 Loss Time (sec) : 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) : 11.6 Optimal Cycle: 39 Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L T - R I II II II I Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 2 0 2 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 I II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 60 493 42 165 771 63 55 77 56 14 19 24 Growth Adj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 60 493 42 165 771 63 55 77 56 14 19 24 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 60 493 42 165 771 63 55 77 56 14 19 24 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 60 493 42 165 771 63 55 77 56 14 19 24 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj : 1.00 1.05 1.00 1.03 1.05 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol. : 60 518 42 170 810 63 55 77 56 14 19 24 I II II II I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 190D 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.85 1.00 0.76 0.85 1.00 0.76 0.74 0.94 0.94 0.48 0.92 0.92 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.58 0.42 1.00 0.44 0.56 Final Sat. : 1615 3800 1445 3230 3800 1445 1411 1034 752 918 772 976 I II II II I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.04 0.14 0.03 0.05 0.21 0.04 0.04 0.07 0.07 0.02 0.02 0.02 Crit Moves: **** **__ **** Green Time: 10.4 63.1 63.1 7.0 59.7 59.7 20.9 20.9 20.9 20.9 20.9 20.9 Volume/Cap: 0.36 0.22 0.05 0.75 0.36 0.07 0.19 0.36 0.36 0.07 0.12 0.12 I II II II I Level Of Service Module: Delay/Veh: 27.5 5.1 4.5 38.4 6.7 5.5 21.1 22.1 22.1 20.5 20.7 20.7 User DelAdj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 27.5 5.1 4.5 38.4 6.7 5.5 21.1 22.1 22.1 20.5 20.7 20.7 DesignQueue: 3 11 1 9 19 1 2 3 3 1 1 1 Traffix 7.1.0427 (c) 1998 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RBWF & ASSOC., IRVINE EXISTING AM Tue Aug 24, 1999 11:12:12 Page 5-1 PASEO VILLAGE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY EXISTING CONDITIONS AM PEAK Level Of Service Computation Report 1994 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #3 SR-111/FRED WARING Cycle (sec) : 140 Critical Vol./Cap. (X) : 0.383 Loss Time (sec) : 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) : 19.2 Optimal Cycle: 46 Level Of Service: C Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 Lanes: 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 2 0 1 2 0 1 0 2 I II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 32 827 30 228 829 20 21 17 15 40 50 269 Growth Adj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 32 827 30 228 829 20 21 17 15 40 50 269 User Adj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 32 827 30 228 829 20 21 17 15 40 50 269 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 32 827 30 228 829 20 21 17 15 40 50 269 PCE Adj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.03 1.10 1.10 1.03 1.10 1.10 1.03 1.05 1.00 1.03 1.00 1.13 Final Vol. : 33 910 33 235 912 22 22 18 15 41 50 304 I II II II I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.76 0.85 1.00 0.76 Lanes: 2.00 2.90 0.10 2.00 2.93 0.07 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 Final Sat. : 3230 5501 199 3230 5566 134 3230 3800 1445 3230 1900 2890 I II II II I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.17 0.17 0.07 0.16 0.16 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.03 0.11 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green Time: 7.0 58.3 58.3 25.6 76.9 76.9 7.0 25.9 25.9 18.1 37.1 37.1 Volume/Cap: 0.20 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.30 0.30 0.14 0.03 0.06 0.10 0.10 0.40 I II II II I Level Of Service Module: Delay/Veh: 41.3 18.5 18.5 32.8 11.0 11.0 41.1 30.2 30.3 34.7 25.1 27.5 User DelAdj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 41.3 18.5 18.5 32.8 11.0 11.0 41.1 30.2 30.3 34.7 25.1 27.5 DesignQueue: 2 43 2 15 33 1 2 1 1 3 3 18 Traffix 7.1.0427 (c) 1998 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RBWF & ASSOC. , IRVINE EXISTING AM Tue Aug 24, 1999 11:12:12 Page 6-1 PASEO VILLAGE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY EXISTING CONDITIONS AM PEAK Level Of Service Computation Report 1994 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #4 TOWN CENTER/FRED WARING Cycle (sec) : 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X) : 0.156 Loss Time (sec) : 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) : 13.5 Optimal Cycle: 82 Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 25 25 7 56 56 Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 I II II II 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 24 6 85 12 10 9 4 201 56 133 292 12 Growth Adj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 24 6 85 12 10 9 4 201 56 133 292 12 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 24 6 85 12 10 9 4 201 56 133 292 12 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 24 6 85 12 10 9 4 201 56 133 292 12 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.05 1.00 1.00 1.05 1.00 Final Vol. : 24 6 85 12 10 9 4 211 56 133 307 12 I II II II I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.81 1.00 0.76 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.85 1.00 0.76 0.85 1.00 0.76 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.39 0.32 0.29 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat. : 1547 1900 1445 620 517 465 1615 3800 1445 1615 3800 1445 I II I I II 1 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.00 0.06 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.06 0.04 0.08 0.08 0.01 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green Time: 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 7.0 25.0 25.0 38.0 56.0 56.0 Volume/Cap: 0.06 0.01 0.21 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.04 0.22 0.16 0.22 0.14 0.01 I II II II I Level Of Service Module: Delay/Veh: 17.0 16.8 17.8 17.1 17.1 17.1 28.0 19.3 18.9 13.6 6.8 6.3 User DelAdj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 17.0 16.8 17.8 17.1 17.1 17.1 28.0 19.3 18.9 13.6 6.8 6.3 DesignQueue: 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 9 2 5 8 0 Traffix 7.1.0427 (c) 1998 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RBWF & ASSOC., IRVINE EXISTING AM Tue Aug 24, 1999 11:12:12 Page 7-1 PASEO VILLAGE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY EXISTING CONDITIONS AM PEAK Level Of Service Computation Report 1994 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #5 MONTEREY/FRED WARING Cycle (sec) : 100 Critical Vo1./Cap. (X) : 0.295 Loss Time (sec) : 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) : 18.9 Optimal Cycle: 46 Level Of Service: C Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 Lanes: 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 2 0 1 2 0 2 0 1 I II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 51 233 116 181 415 96 54 194 49 153 410 140 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 51 233 116 181 415 96 54 194 49 153 410 140 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 51 233 116 181 415 96 54 194 49 153 410 140 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 51 233 116 181 415 96 54 194 49 153 410 140 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.03 1.10 1.10 1.03 1.10 1.00 1.03 1.05 1.00 1.03 1.05 1.00 Final Vol. : 53 256 128 186 457 96 56 204 49 158 431 140 I II II II I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900" 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.85 0.95 0.95 0.85 1.00 0.76 0.85 1.00 0.76 0.85 1.00 0.76 Lanes: 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat. : 3230 3610 1805 3230 5700 1445 3230 3800 1445 3230 3800 1445 I II II II I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.08 0.07 0.02 0.05 0.03 0.05 0.11 0.10 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green Time: 17.7 23.7 23.7 19.3 25.3 25.3 7.0 26.5 26.5 18.5 38.0 38.0 Volume/Cap: 0.09 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.32 0.26 0.25 0.20 0.13 0.26 0.30 0.26 I II II II I Level Of Service Module: Delay/Veh: 22.2 20.3 20.3 22.4 19.6 19.4 28.6 18.5 18.1 22.6 14.1 13.8 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 22.2 20.3 20.3 22.4 19.6 19.4 28.6 18.5 18.1 22.6 14.1 13.8 DesignQueue: 2 11 6 8 19 4 3 8 2 7 15 5 Traffix 7.1.0427 (c) 1998 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RBWF & ASSOC. , IRVINE EXISTING PM Mon Aug 23, 1999 10:12:58 Page 1-1 PASEO VILLAGE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY EXISTING CONDITIONS PM PEAK Scenario Report Scenario: EXISTING PM Command: EXISTING PM Volume: EXISTING PM Geometry: Default Geometry Impact Fee: Default Impact Fee Trip Generation: Default Trip Generation Trip Distribution: Default Trip Distribution Paths: Default Paths Routes: Default Routes Configuration: EXISTING PM Traffix 7.1.0427 (c) 1998 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RBWF & ASSOC., IRVINE l EXISTING PM Mon Aug 23, 1999 10:12:58 Page 2-1 PASEO VILLAGE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY EXISTING CONDITIONS PM PEAK Impact Analysis Report Level Of Service Intersection Base Future Change Del/ V/ Del/ V/ in LOS Veh C LOS Veh C # 1 SR-111/PARK VIEW B 9.4 0.443 B 9.4 0.443 + 0.000 D/V # 2 MONTEREY/PARK VIEW B 9.8 0.375 B 9.8 0.375 + 0.000 D/V # 3 SR-111/FRED WARING C 22.7 0.640 C 22.7 0.640 + 0.000 D/V # 4 TOWN CENTER/FRED WARING B 14.4 0.383 B 14.4 0.383 + 0.000 D/V # 5 MONTEREY/FRED WARING C 20.3 0.505 C 20.3 0.505 + 0.000 D/V Traffix 7.1.0427 (c) 1998 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RBWF & ASSOC. , IRVINE EXISTING PM Mon Aug 23, 1999 10:12:58 Page 3-1 PASEO VILLAGE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY EXISTING CONDITIONS PM PEAK Level Of Service Computation Report 1994 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #1 SR-111/PARK VIEW Cycle (sec) : 140 Critical Vol./Cap. (X) : 0.443 Loss Time (sec) : 9 (Y+R - 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) : 9.4 Optimal Cycle: 36 Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Control: Protected Protected Permitted .Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Lanes: 1 0 3 0 1 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 I II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 14 1442 30 95 1402 46 29 9 4 26 13 112 Growth Adj : 1.00 1.0C 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 14 1442 30 95 1402 46 29 9 4 26 13 112 User Adj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 14 1442 30 95 1402 46 29 9 4 26 13 112 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 14 1442 30 95 1402 46 29 9 4 26 13 112 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj : 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol. : 14 1586 30 95 1542 51 29 9 4 26 13 112 I II II II I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.85 1.00 0.76 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.88 0.88 0.76 Lanes: 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 2.90 0.10 0.69 0.21 0.10 0.67 0.33 1.00 Final Sat. : 1615 5700 1445 1615 5518 182 1027 319 142 1115 557 1445 I II II II I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.28 0.02 0.06 0.28 0.28 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.08 Crit Moves: ***; *.** ..#* Green Time: 7.0 87.9 87.9 18.6 99.5 99.5 24.5 24.5 24.5 24.5 24.5 24.5 Volume/Cap: 0.17 0.44 0.03 0.44 0.39 0.39 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.13 0.13 0.44 I II II II I Level Of Service Module: Delay/Veh: 41.3 8.7 6.4 37.1 5.3 5.3 31.7 31.7 31.7 31.5 31.5 34.2 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 41.3 8.7 6.4 37.1 5.3 5.3 31.7 31.7 31.7 31.5 31.5 34.2 DesignQueue: 1 50 1 6 37 1 2 1 0 2 1 7 Traffix 7.1.0427 (c) 1998 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RBWF & ASSOC., IRVINE j n EXISTING PM Mon Aug 23, 1999 10:12:58 Page 4-1 PASEO VILLAGE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY EXISTING CONDITIONS PM PEAK Level Of Service Computation Report 1994 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #2 MONTEREY/PARK VIEW Cycle (sec) : 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X) : 0.375 Loss Time (sec) : 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) : 9.8 Optimal Cycle: 39 Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 2 0 2 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 I II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 75 891 35 59 685 47 84 29 67 38 37 91 Growth Adj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 75 891 35 59 685 47 84 29 67 38 37 91 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 75 891 35 59 685 47 84 29 67 38 37 91 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 75 891 35 59 685 47 84 29 67 38 37 91 PCE Adj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.05 1.00 1.03 1.05 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol. : 75 936 35 61 719 47 84 29 67 38 37 91 I II II II I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.85 1.00 0.76 0.85 1.00 0.76 0.49 0.90 0.90 0.58 0.89 0.89 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.30 0.70 1.00 0.29 0.71 Final Sat. : 1615 3800 1445 3230 3800 1445 935 517 1193 1105 489 1202 I II II II I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.25 0.02 0.02 0.19 0.03 0.09 0.06 0.06 0.03 0.08 0.08 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green Time: 10.0 64.3 64.3 7.0 61.3 61.3 19.7 19.7 19.7 19.7 19.7 19.7 Volume/Cap: 0.46 0.38 0.04 0.27 0.31 0.05 0.45 0.28 0.28 0.17 0.38 0.38 I II II II I Level Of Service Module: Delay/Veh: 29.0 5.5 4.2 28.6 6.0 5.0 24.1 22.2 22.2 21.6 22.9 22.9 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 29.0 5.5 4.2 28.6 6.0 5.0 24.1 22.2 22.2 21.6 22.9 22.9 DesignQueue: 4 20 1 3 16 1 4 1 3 2 2 4 Traffix 7.1.0427 (c) 1998 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RBWF & ASSOC., IRVINE EXISTING PM Mon Aug 23, 1999 10:12:58 Page 5-1 PASEO VILLAGE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY EXISTING CONDITIONS PM PEAK Level Of Service Computation Report 1994 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection M3 SR-111/FRED WARING Cycle (sec) : 140 Critical Vol./Cap. (X) : 0.640 Loss Time (sec) : 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) : 22.7 Optimal Cycle: 55 Level Of Service: C Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 Lanes: 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 2 0 1 2 0 1 0. 2 I II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 57 1293 125 456 1044 75 98 117 70 190 143 338 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 57 1293 125 456 1044 75 98 117 70 190 143 338 User Adj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 57 1293 125 456 1044 75 98 117 70 190 143 338 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 57 1293 125 456 1044 75 98 117 70 190 143 338 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.03 1.10 1.10 1.03 1.10 1.10 1.03 1.05 1.00 1.03 1.00 1.13 Final Vol. : 59 1422 138 470 1148 83 101 123 70 196 143 382 I II II II I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.85 0.99 0.99 0.85 0.99 0.99 0.85 1.00 0.76 0.85 1.00 0.76 Lanes: 2.00 2.73 0.27 2.00 2.80 0.20 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 Final Sat. : 3230 5144 499 3230 5263 380 3230 3800 1445 3230 1900 2890 I II II II I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.C2 0.28 0.28 0.15 0.22 C.22 0.03 0.03 0.05 0.06 0.08 0.13 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green Time: 7.0 60.4 60.4 31.8 85.1 85.1 7.0 10.0 10.0 25.9 28.9 28.9 Volume/Cap: 0.37 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.36 0.36 0.63 0.45 0.68 0.33 0.37 0.64 I II II II I Level Of Service Module: Delay/Veh: 42.2 20.6 20.6 33.0 8.9 8.9 47.2 41.1 51.7 32.1 31.1 34.5 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 42.2 20.6 20.6 33.0 8.9 8.9 47.2 41.1 51.7 32.1 31.1 34.5 DesignQueue: 4 68 7 29 37 3 8 9 5 13 9 24 Traffix 7.1.0427 (c) 1998 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RBWF & ASSOC., IRVINE V EXISTING PM Mon Aug 23, 1999 10:12:58 Page 6-1 PASEO VILLAGE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY EXISTING CONDITIONS PM PEAK Level Of Service Computation Report 1994 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #4 TOWN CENTER/FRED WARING Cycle (sec) : 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X) : 0.383 Loss Time (sec) : 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) : 14.4 Optimal Cycle: 36 Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 I II I I II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 170 16 161 18 11 15 23 495 114 147 431 31 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 170 16 161 18 11 15 23 495 114 147 431 31 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 170 16 161 18 11 15 23 495 114 147 431 31 Reduce Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 170 16 161 18 11 15 23 495 114 147 431 31 PCE Adj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.05 1.00 1.00 1.05 1.00 Final Vol. : 170 16 161 18 11 15 23 520 114 147 453 31 I II II II I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.74 1.00 0.76 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.85 1.00 0.76 0.85 1.00 0.76 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.41 0.25 0.34 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat. : 1411 1900 1445 641 392 534 1615 3800 1445 1615 3800 1445 I II II II I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.12 0.01 0.11 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.01 0.14 0.08 0.09 0.12 0.02 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green Time: 31.5 31.5 31.5 31.5 31.5 31.5 7.0 35.7 35.7 23.8 52.5 52.5 Volume/Cap: 0.38 0.03 0.35 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.20 0.38 0.22 0.38 0.23 0.04 I II II II I Level Of Service Module: Delay/Veh: 17.5 15.3 17.3 15.6 15.6 15.6 28.5 15.5 14.5 21.0 8.3 7.4 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 17.5 15.3 17.3 15.6 15.6 15.6 28.5 15.5 14.5 21.0 8.3 7.4 DesignQueue: 7 1 6 1 0 1 1 19 4 6 12 1 Traffix 7.1.0427 (c) 1998 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RBWF & ASSOC., IRVINE EXISTING PM Mon Aug 23, 1999 10:12:58 Page 7-1 PASEO VILLAGE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY EXISTING CONDITIONS PM PEAK Level Of Service Computation Report 1994 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #5 MONTEREY/FRED WARING Cycle (sec) : 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X) : 0.505 Loss Time (sec) : 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) : 20.3 Optimal Cycle: 46 Level Of Service: C Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R II II II 1 Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 Lanes: 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 2 0 1 2 0 2 0 1 I II II II i Volume Module: Base Vol: 75 559 249 195 442 141 182 560 65 199 425 198 Growth Adj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 75 559 249 195 442 141 182 560 65 199 425 198 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 75 559 249 195 442 141 182 560 65 199 425 198 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 75 559 249 195 442 141 182 560 65 199 425 198 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.03 1.10 1.10 1.03 1.10 1.00 1.03 1.05 1.00 1.03 1.05 1.00 Final Vol. : 77 615 274 201 486 141 187 588 65 205 446 198 I II II II I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.85 0.95 0.95 0.85 1.00 0.76 0.85 1.00 0.76 0.85 1.00 0.76 Lanes: 2.00 2.08 0.92 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat. : 3230 3746 1669 3230 5700 1445 3230 3800 1445 3230 3800 1445 I II it II I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.16 0.16 0.06 0.09 0.10 0.06 0.15 0.04 0.06 0.12 0.14 Crit Moves• **** **** *-** **** Green Time: 18.5 32.5 32.5 12.3 26.4 26.4 7.0 30.6 30.6 12.6 36.2 36.2 Volume/Cap: 0.13 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.32 0.37 0.83 0.51 0.15 0.51 0.32 0.38 I II II II Level Of Service Module: Delay/Veh: 22.0 17.8 17.8 27.4 19.2 19.7 44.4 18.7 16.3 27.2 15.0 15.5 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 22.0 17.8 17.8 27.4 19.2 19.7 44.4 18.7 16.3 27.2 15.0 15.5 DesignQueue: 4 24 11 10 20 6 10 24 3 10 16 7 Traffix 7.1.0427 (c) 1998 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RBWF & ASSOC. , IRVINE EX + FUTURE AM Wed Sep 1, 1999 19:03:45 Page 1-1, PASEO VILLAGE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY EXISTING + FUTURE PROJECTS AM PEAK Scenario Report Scenario: EX + FUTURE AM Command: EX + FUTURE AM Volume: EX + FUTURE AM Geometry: Default Geometry Impact Fee: Default Impact Fee Trip Generation: Default Trip Generation Trip Distribution: Default Trip Distribution Paths: Default Paths Routes: Default Routes Configuration: EX + FUTURE AM Traffix 7.1.0427 (c) 1998 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RBWF & ASSOC. , IRVINE EX + FUTURE AM Wed Sep 1, 1999 19:03:45 Page 2-1 . PASEO VILLAGE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY EXISTING + FUTURE PROJECTS AM PEAK Impact Analysis Report Level Of Service Intersection Base Future Change Del/ V/ Del/ V/ in LOS Veh C LOS Veh C # 1 SR-111/PARK VIEW B 9.9 0.352 B 9.9 0.352 + 0.000 D/V # 2 MONTEREY/PARK VIEW B 12.1 0.494 B 12.1 0.494 + 0.000 D/V # 3 SR-111/FRED WARING C 20.4 0.532 C 20.4 0.532 + 0.000 D/V # 4 TOWN CENTER/FRED WARING B 14.0 0.222 B 14.0 0.222 + 0.000 D/V # 5 MONTEREY/FRED WARING C 18.3 0.408 'C 18.3 0.408 + 0.000 D/V Traffix 7.1.0427 (c) 1998 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RBWF & ASSOC., IRVINE f . EX + FUTURE AM Wed Sep 1, 1999 19:03:45 Page 3-1• PASEO VILLAGE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY EXISTING + FUTURE PROJECTS AM PEAK Level Of Service Computation Report 1994 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #1 SR-111/PARK VIEW Cycle (sec) : 140 Critical Vol./Cap. (X) : 0.352 Loss Time (sec) : 9 (Y+R - 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) : 9.9 Optimal Cycle: 36 Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound west Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Lanes: 1 0 3 0 1 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 I II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 5 907 13 53 906 13 9 2 4 11 8 83 Growth Adj : 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 Initial Bse: 7 1255 18 73 1254 18 12 3 6 15 11 115 User Adj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 7 1255 18 73 1254 18 12 3 6 15 11 115 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 7 1255 18 73 1254 18 12 3 6 15 11 115 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj : 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol. : 7 1381 18 73 1379 20 12 3 6 15 11 115 I II II II I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.85 1.00 0.766 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.95 0.95 0.76 Lanes: 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 2.96 0.04 0.57 0.14 0.29 0.58 0.42 1.00 Final Sat. : 1615 5700 1445 1615 5619 81 887 222 444 1041 764 1445 I II II II I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.24 0.01 0.05 0.25 0.25 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.08 Crit Moves: ""• .... ..*. Green Time: 7.0 93.6 93.6 7.0 93.6 93.6 30.4 30.4 30.4 30.4 30.4 30.4 Volume/Cap: 0.09 0.36 0.02 0.90 0.37 0.37 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.07 0.07 0.37 I II II II I Level Of Service Module: Delay/Veh: 41.0 6.6 5.0 90.5 6.6 6.6 28.1 28.1 28.1 28.1 28.1 30.5 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 41.0 6.6 5.0 90.5 6.6 6.6 28.1 28.1 28.1 28.1 28.1 30.5 DesignQueue: 1 38 0 5 38 1 1 0 0 1 1 7 Traffix 7.1.0427 (c) 1998 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to R3WF & ASSOC. , IRVINE • EX + FUTURE AM Wed Sep 1, 1999 19:03:45 Page 4-1• PASEO VILLAGE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY EXISTING + FUTURE PROJECTS AM PEAK Level Of Service Computation Report 1994 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #2 MONTEREY/PARK VIEW Cycle (sec) : 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X) : 0.494 Loss Time (sec) : 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) : 12.1 Optimal Cycle: 39 Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 2 0 2 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 I II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 60 493 42 165 771 63 55 77 56 14 19 24 Growth Adj: 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 Initial Bse: 83 682 58 228 1067 87 76 107 78 19 26 33 User Adj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 83 682 58 228 1067 87 76 107 78 19 26 33 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 83 682 58 228 1067 87 76 107 78 19 26 33 PCB Adj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj : 1.00 1.05 1.00 1.03 1.05 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol. : 83 717 58 235 1121 87 76 107 78 19 26 33 I II II II I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.85 1.00 0.76 0.85 1.00 0.76 0.71 0.94 0.94 . 0.37 0.92 0.92 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.58 0.42 1.00 0.44 0.56 Final Sat. : 1615 3800 1445 3230 3800 1445 1343 1033 753 697 770 978 I II II II I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.19 0.04 C.07 0.29 0.06 0.06 0.10 0.10 0.03 0.03 0.03 Crit Moves: •*** .►.* ...* Green Time: 10.4 50.6 50.6 19.5 59.7 59.7 20.9 20.9 20.9 20.9 20.9 20.9 Volume/Cap: 0.49 0.37 0.08 0.37 0.49 0.10 0.27 0.49 0.49 0.13 0.16 0.16 I II II II I Level Of Service Module: Delay/Veh: 29.2 9.8 8.2 22.8 7.6 5.6 21.5 23.4 23.4 20.8 20.9 20.9 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 29.2 9.8 8.2 22.8 7.6 5.6 21.5 23.4 23.4 20.8 20.9 20.9 DesignQueue: 4 21 2 11 27 2 3 5 4 1 1 1 Traffix 7.1.0427 (c) 1998 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RBWF & ASSOC., IRV:NE EX + FUTURE AM Wed Sep 1, 1999 19:03:45 Page 5-1• PASEO VILLAGE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY EXISTING + FUTURE PROJECTS AM PEAK Level Of Service Computation Report 1994 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #3 SR-111/FRED WARING Cycle (sec) : 140 Critical Vol./Cap. (X) : 0.532 Loss Time (sec) : 12 (Y+R - 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) : 20.4 Optimal Cycle: 46 Level Of Service: C Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 Lanes: 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 2 0 1 2 0 2 0 2 I II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 32 827 30 228 829 20 21 17 15 40 50 269 Growth Adj: 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 . 1.38 Initial Bse: 44 1145 42 316 1148 28 29 24 21 55 69 372 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 44 1145 42 316 1148 28 29 24 21 55 69 372 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 44 1145 42 316 1148 28 29 24 21 55 69 372 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj : 1.03 1.10 1.10 1.03 1.10 1.10 1.03 1.05 1.00 1.03 1.05 1.13 Final Vol. : 46 1259 46 325 1262 30 30 25 21 57 73 421 I 11 II II 1 Saturaticr. Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.85 0.99 0.99 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.76 0.85 1.00 0.76 Lanes: 2.00 2.89 0.11 2.00 2.93 0.07 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Final Sat. : 3230 5444 199 3230 5568 132 3230 3800 1445 3230 3800 2890 I II II II I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.23 0.23 0.10 0.23 0.23 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.15 Crit Moves: .... .... .... .... Green Time: 7.0 58.6 58.6 25.5 77.1 77.1 7.0 25.8 25.8 18.1 36.9 36.9 Volume/Cap: 0.28 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.41 0.41 0.19 0.04 0.08 0.14 0.07 0.55 I II II II I Level Of Service Module: Delay/Veh: 41.7 20.1 20.1 34.5 11.9 11.9 41.3 30.3 30.5 34.9 25.0 29.4 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 41.7 20.1 20.1 34.5 11.9 11.9 41.3 30.3 30.5 34.9 25.0 29.4 DesignQueue: 3 61 2 21 47 1 2 2 1 4 4 25 Traffix 7.1.0427 (c) 1998 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RBWF & ASSOC., IRVINE EX + FUTURE AM Wed Sep 1, 1999 19:03:45 Page 6-1. PASEO VILLAGE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY EXISTING + FUTURE PROJECTS AM PEAK Level Of Service Computation Report 1994 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #4 TOWN CENTER/FRED WARING Cycle (sec) : 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X) : 0.222 Loss Time (sec) : 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) : 14.0 Optimal Cycle: 82 Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 25 25 7 56 56 Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 I II II I I I Volume Module: Base Vol: 24 6 85 12 10 9 10 201 56 133 292 12 Growth Adj : 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 Initial Bse: 33 8 118 17 14 12 14 278 78 184 404 17 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 33 8 118 17 14 12 14 278 78 184 404 17 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 33 8 118 17 14 12 14 278 78 184 404 17 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.05 1.00 1.00 1.05 1.00 Final Vol. : 33 8 118 17 14 12 14 292 78 184 424 17 I II II II I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.79 1.00 0.76 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.85 1.00 0.76 0.85 1.00 0.76 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.39 0.33 0.28 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat. : 1496 1900 1445 633 521 447 1615 3800 1445 1615 3800 1445 I II II II I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.00 0.08 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.01 0.08 0.05 0.11 C.11 0.01 Crit Moves: .... .... Green Time: 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 7.0 25.0 25.0 38.0 56.0 56.0 Volume/Cap: 0.08 0.02 0.29 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.12 0.31 0.22 0.30 0.20 0.02 I II II II I Level Of Service Module: Delay/Veh: 17.1 16.8 18.4 17.2 17.2 17.2 28.2 19.7 19.3 14.1 7.0 6.3 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 17.1 16.8 18.4 17.2 17.2 17.2 28.2 19.7 19.3 14.1 7.0 6.3 DesignQueue: 1 0 5 1 1 0 1 12 3 7 11 0 Traffix 7.1.0427 (c) 1998 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RBWF & ASSOC., IRVINE EX + FUTURE AM Wed Sep 1, 1999 19:03:45 Page 7-1. PASEO VILLAGE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY EXISTING + FUTURE PROJECTS AM PEAK Level Of Service Computation Report 1994 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #5 MONTEREY/FRED WARING Cycle (sec) : 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X) : 0.408 Loss Time (sec) : 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) : 18.3 Optimal Cycle: 46 Level Of Service: C Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T R I II II II I Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 Lanes: 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 2 0 1 2 0 2 0 1 I II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 51 233 116 181 415 96 54 194 49 153 410 140 Growth Adj: 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 Initial Bse: 71 323 161 251 574 133 75 269 68 212 568 194 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 71 323 161 251 574 133 75 269 68 212 568 194 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 71 323 161 251 574 133 75 269 68 212 568 194 PCE Adj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.03 1.10 1.10 1.03 1.10 1.00 1.03 1.05 1.00 1.03 1.05 1.00 Final Vol. : 73 355 177 258 632 133 77 282 68 218 596 194 I II II II I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.85 0.95 0.95 0.85 1.00 0.76 0.85 1.00 0.76 0.85 1.00 0.76 Lanes: 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat. : 3230 3613 1802 3230 5700 1445 3230 3800 1445 3230 3800 1445 I II II II I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.10 0.10 0.08 0.11 0.09 0.02 0.07 0.05 0.07 0.16 0.13 Crit Moves: ...♦ .... •... ♦... Green Time: 7.0 23.8 23.8 19.3 36.1 36.1 7.0 26.4 26.4 18.5 37.9 37.9 Volume/Cap: 0.32 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.31 0.26 0.34 0.28 0.18 0.36 0.41 0.35 I II it II I Level Of Service Module: Delay/Veh: 28.9 21.0 21.0 23.1 14.9 14.6 29.0 18.9 18.4 23.2 14.9 14.5 User DelAdj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 28.9 21.0 21.0 23.1 14.9 14.6 29.0 18.9 18.4 23.2 14.9 14.5 DesignQueue: 4 15 8 12 23 5 4 12 3 10 21 7 Traffix 7.1.0427 (c) 1998 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RBWF & ASSOC., IRVINE EX + FUTURE PM Wed Sep 1, 1999 19:06:44 Page 1-1. PASEO VILLAGE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY EXISTING + FUTURE PROJECTS PM PEAK Scenario Report Scenario: EX + FUTURE PM Command: EX + FUTURE PM Volume: EX + FUTURE PM Geometry: Default Geometry Impact Fee: Default Impact Fee Trip Generation: Default Trip Generation Trip Distribution: Default Trip Distribution Paths: Default Paths Routes: Default Routes Configuration: EX + FUTURE PM Traffix 7.1.0427 (c) 1998 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RBWF & ASSOC., IRVINE EX + FUTURE PM Wed Sep 1, 1999 19:06:44 Page 2-1. PASEO VILLAGE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY EXISTING + FUTURE PROJECTS PM PEAK Impact Analysis Report Level Of Service Intersection Base Future Change Del/ V/ Del/ V/ in LOS Veh C LOS Veh C # 1 SR-111/PARK VIEW B 10.8 0.613 B 10.8 0.613 + 0.000 D/V 4 2 MONTEREY/PARK VIEW B 12.0 0.566 B 12.0 0.566 + 0.000 D/V # 3 SR-111/FRED WARING D 28.6 0.886 D 28.6 0.886 + 0.000 D/V # 4 TOWN CENTER/FRED WARING C 17.8 0.393 C 17.8 0.393 + 0.000 D/V # 5 MONTEREY/FRED WARING C 21.0 0.699 C 21.0 0.699 + 0.000 D/V Traffix 7.1.0427 (c) 1998 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RBWF & ASSOC., IRVINE EX + FUTURE PM Wed Sep 1, 1999 19:06:44 Page 3-1. PASEO VILLAGE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY EXISTING + FUTURE PROJECTS PM PEAK Level Of Service Computation Report 1994 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #1 SR-111/PARK VIEW Cycle (sec) : 140 Critical Vol./Cap. (X) : 0.613 Loss Time (sec) : 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) : 10.8 Optimal Cycle: 44 Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II I I II I Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Lanes: 1 0 3 0 1 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 I II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 14 1442 30 95 1402 46 29 9 4 26 13 112 Growth Adj: 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 Initial Bse: 19 1996 42 131 1941 64 40 12 6 36 18 155 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 19 1996 42 131 1941 64 40 12 6 36 18 155 Reduct Vol: 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 19 1996 42 131 1941 64 40 12 6 36 18 155 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol. : 19 2196 42 131 2135 70 40 12 6 36 18 155 I II II II I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 • Adjustment: 0.85 1.00 0.76 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.83 0.83 0.76 Lanes: 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 2.90 0.10 0.69 0.21 0.10 0.67 0.33 1.00 Final Sat. : 1615 5700 1445 1615 5519 181 980 294 147 1051 526 1445 I II II II I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.39 0.03 0.08 0.39 0.39 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.11 Crit Moves: .4.. -••• ,... Green Time: 7.0 88.0 88.0 19.5 99.5 99.5 24.5 24.5 24.5 24.5 24.5 24.5 Volume/Cap: 0.24 0.61 0.05 0.61 0.54 0.54 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.20 0.20 0.61 I II II II i Level Of Service Module: Delay/Veh: 41.6 10.4 6.4 40.6 6.3 6.3 32.2 32.2 32.2 31.9 31.9 37.6 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 41.6 10.4 6.4 40.6 6.3 6.3 32.2 32.2 32.2 31.9 31.9 37.6 DesignQueue: 1 71 1 9 54 2 3 1 0 2 1 10 Traffix 7.1.0427 (c) 1998 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RBWF & ASSOC. , IRV:NE EX + FUTURE PM Wed Sep 1, 1999 19:06:44 Page 4-1• PASEO VILLAGE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY EXISTING + FUTURE PROJECTS PM PEAK Level Of Service Computation Report 1994 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #2 MONTEREY/PARK VIEW Cycle (sec) : 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X) : 0.566 Loss Time (sec) : 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) : 12.0 Optimal Cycle: 39 Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 2 0 2 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 I II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 75 891 35 59 685 47 84 29 67 38 37 91 Growth Adj: 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 Initial Bse: 104 1233 48 82 948 65 116 40 93 53 51 126 User Adj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 104 1233 48 82 948 65 116 40 93 53 51 126 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 104 1233 48 82 948 65 116 40 93 53 51 126 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ' 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.05 1.00 1.03 1.05 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol. : 104 1295 48 84 996 65 116 40 93 53 51 126 I II II II I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.85 1.00 0.76 0.85 1.00 0.76 0.41 0.90 0.90 0.51 0.89 0.89 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.30 0.70 1.00 0.29 0.71 Final Sat. : 1615 3800 1445 3230 3800 1445 782 514 1196 969 487 1204 I II II II I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.06 0.34 0.03 0.03 0.26 0.04 0.15 0.08 0.08 0.05 0.10 0.10 Crit Moves: .... «-.« .... Green Time: 10.0 58.5 58.5 7.0 55.5 55.5 25.5 25.5 25.5 25.5 25.5 25.5 Volume/Cap: 0.64 0.58 0.06 0.37 0.47 0.08 0.58 0.31 0.31 0.21 0.41 0.41 I II II II I Level Of Service Module: Delay/Veh: 33.7 8.7 5.7 29.2 8.8 6.7 24.2 19.6 19.6 19.0 20.4 20.4 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 33.7 8.7 5.7 29.2 8.8 6.7 24.2 19.6 19.6 19.0 20.4 20.4 DesignQueue: 5 33 1 4 26 2 5 2 4 2 2 5 Traffix 7.1.0427 (c) 1998 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RBWF & ASSOC. , IRVINE EX + FUTURE PM Wed Sep 1, 1999 19:06:44 Page 5-1- PASEO VILLAGE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY EXISTING + FUTURE PROJECTS PM PEAK Level Of Service Computation Report 1994 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #3 SR-111/FRED WARING Cycle (sec) : 140 Critical Vol./Cap. (X) : 0.886 Loss Time (sec) : 12 (Y+R - 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) : 26.6 Optimal Cycle: 120 Level Of Service: D Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I it II II I Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 Lanes: 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 2 0 1 2 0 2 0 2 I II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 57 1293 125 456 1044 75 98 117 70 190 143 338 Growth Adj: 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 Initial Bse: 79 1790 173 631 1445 104 136 162 97 263 198 468 User Adj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 79 1790 173 631 1445 104 136 162 97 263 199 468 Reduce Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 79 1790 173 631 1445 104 136 162 97 263 199 468 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.03 1.10 1.10 1.03 1.10 1.10 1.03 1.05 1.00 1.03 1.05 1.13 Final Vol. : 81 1969 190 650 1590 114 140 170 97 271 208 529 I II II II Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.85 0.99 0.99 0.85 0.99 0.99 0.85 1.00 0.76 0.85 1.00 0.76 Lanes: 2.00 2.74 0.26 2.00 2.80 0.20 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Final Sat. : 3230 5146 497 3230 5265 378 3230 3800 1445 3230 3800 2890 I II II II I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.38 0.38 0.20 0.30 C.30 0.04 0.04 0.07 0.08 0.05 0.18 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green Time: 7.0 60.4 60.4 31.8 85.1 85.1 7.0 10.0 10.0 25.9 28.9 28.9 Volume/Cap: 0.50 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.50 0.50 0.87 0.63 0.94. 0.45 0.27 0.89 II II II Level Of Service Module: Delay/Veh: 43.9 26.9 26.9 42.9 10.1 10.1 67.2 44.0 91.6 33.2 30.2 45.5 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 43.9 26.9 26.9 42.9 10.1 10.1 67.2 44.0 91.6 33.2 30.2 45.5 DesignQueue: 6 97 9 41 53 4 10 12 7 18 13 34 Traffix 7.1.0427 (c) 1998 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RBWF 6 ASSOC., IRVINE 2-33 EX + FUTURE PM Wed Sep 1, 1999 19:06:44 Page 6-1• PASEO VILLAGE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY EXISTING + FUTURE PROJECTS PM PEAK Level Of Service Computation Report 1994 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #4 TOWN CENTER/FRED WARING Cycle (sec) : 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X) : 0.393 Loss Time (sec) : 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) : 17.8 Optimal Cycle: 82 Level Of Service: C Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 25 25 7 56 56 Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 I 11 II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 170 16 161 18 11 15 23 495 114 147 431 31 Growth Adj : 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 Initial Bse: 235 22 223 25 15 21 32 685 158 203 597 43 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 235 22 223 25 15 21 32 685 158 203 597 43 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 235 22 223 25 15 21 32 685 158 203 597 43 PCE Adj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.05 1.00 1.00 1.05 1.00 Final Vol. : 235 22 223 25 15 21 32 719 158 203 626 43 I 11 II 11 I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 . 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.72 1.00 0.76 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.85 1.00 0.76 0.85 1.00 0.76 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.41 0.25 0.34 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat. : 1360 1900 1445 635 381 534 1615 3800 1445 1615 3800 1445 I II 11 II I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.17 0.01 0.15 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.02 0.19 0.11 0.13 0.16 0.03 Crit Moves: **** **** +... Green Time: 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 7.0 25.0 25.0 38.0 56.0 56.0 Volume/Cap: 0.62 0.04 0.55 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.28 0.76 0.44 0.33 0.29 0.05 I II II II I Level Of Service Module: Delay/Veh: 22.4 16.9 21.0 17.4 17.4 17.4 28.9 24.9 21.0 14.3 7.5 6.4 User DelAdj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 22.4 16.9 21.0 17.4 17.4 17.4 28.9 24.9 21.0 14.3 7.5 6.4 DesignQueue: 10 1 9 1 1 1 2 32 7 7 16 1 Traffix 7.1.0427 (c) 1998 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RBWF & ASSOC., IRVINE • EX + FUTURE PM Wed Sep 1, 1999 19:06:44 Page 7-1• PASEO VILLAGE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY EXISTING + FUTURE PROJECTS PM PEAK Level Of Service Computation Report 1994 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #5 MONTEREY/FRED WARING Cycle (sec) : 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X) : 0.699 Loss Time (sec) : 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) : 21.0 Optimal Cycle: 59 Level Of Service: C Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 Lanes: 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 2 0 1 2 0 2 0 1 I II II II Volume Module: Base Vol: 75 559 249 195 442 141 182 560 65 199 425 198 Growth Adj : 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 Initial Bse: 104 774 345 270 612 195 252 775 90 275 588 274 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 104 774 345 270 612 195 252 775 90 275 588 274 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 104 774 345 270 612 195 252 775 90 275 588 274 PCE Adj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.03 1.10 1.10 1.03 1.10 1.00 1.03 1.05 1.00 1.03 1.05 1.00 Final Vol. : 107 851 379 278 673 195 259 814 90 284 618 274 I II II II Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.85 0.95 0.95 0.85 1.00 0.76 0.85 1.00 0.76 0.85 1.00 0.76 Lanes: 2.00 2.08 0.92 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat. : 3230 3746 1669 3230 5700 1445 3230 3800 1445 3230 3800 1445 I II II II I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.23 0.23 0.09 0.12 0.13 0.08 0.21 0.06 0.09 0.16 0.19 Crit Moves: "" •`•• `•`• +•*• Green Time: 7.0 32.5 32.5 12.3 37.8 37.8 12.8 30.6 30.6 12.6 30.4 30.4 Volume/Cap: 0.47 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.31 0.36 0.62 0.70 0.20 0.70 0.54 0.62 I II II II Level Of Service Module: Delay/Veh: 30.1 19.9 19.9 30.9 14.2 14.6 28.8 21.1 16.6 30.7 19.1 21.3 User DelAdj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 30.1 19.9 19.9 30.9 14.2 14.6 28.8 21.1 16.6 30.7 19.1 21.3 DesignQueue: 6 34 15 14 24 7 13 33 4 14 25 11 Traffix 7.1.0427 (c) 1998 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RBWF & ASSOC., IRVINE EX+FUT+PROJECT AM Wed Sep 1, 1999 19:09:36 Page 1-1 • PASEO VILLAGE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY EXISTING + FUTURE PROJECTS + PROJECT AM PEAK Scenario Report Scenario: EX+FUT+PROJECT AM Command: EX + FUT + PROJECT AM Volume: EX + FUT + PROJECT AM Geometry: Default Geometry Impact Fee: Default Impact Fee Trip Generation: Default Trip Generation Trip Distribution: Default Trip Distribution Paths: Default Paths Routes: Default Routes Configuration: EX + FUT + PROJECT AM Traffix 7.1.0427 (c) 1998 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RBWF & ASSOC. , IRVINE EX+FUT+PROJECT AM Wed Sep 1, 1999 19:09:36 Page 2-1• PASEO VILLAGE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY EXISTING + FUTURE PROJECTS + PROJECT AM PEAK Impact Analysis Report Level Of Service Intersection Base Future Change Del/ V/ Del/ V/ in LOS Veh C LOS Veh C # 1 SR-111/PARK VIEW B 9.9 0.352 B 10.2 0.354 + 0.319 D/V # 2 MONTEREY/PARK VIEW B 12.1 0.494 B 12.1 0.497 + 0.058 D/V # 3 SR-111/FRED WARING C 20.4 0.532 C 20.5 0.535 + 0.031 D/V # 4 TOWN CENTER/FRED WARING B 13.9 0.216 B 13.9 0.220 + 0.035 D/V # 5 MONTEREY/FRED WARING C 18.3 0.408 C 18.3 0.409 + 0.004 D/V Traffix 7.1.0427 (c) 1998 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RBWF & ASSOC. , IRVINE EX+FUT+PROJECT AM Wed Sep 1, 1999 19:09:36 Page 3-1• PASEO VILLAGE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY EXISTING + FUTURE PROJECTS + PROJECT AM PEAK Level Of Service Computation Report 1994 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #1 SR-111/PARK VIEW Cycle (sec) : 140 Critical Vo1./Cap. (X) : 0.354 Loss Time (sec) : 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) : 10.2 Optimal Cycle: 36 Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Lanes: 1 0 3 0 1 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 I II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 5 907 13 53 906 13 9 2 4 11 8 83 Growth Adj : 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 Initial Bse: 7 1255 18 73 1254 18 12 3 6 15 11 115 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PROJECT: 0 0 2 2 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 Initial Fut: 7 1255 20 75 1256 18 12 4 6 16 11 117 User Adj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 7 1255 20 75 1256 18 12 4 6 16 11 117 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 7 1255 20 75 1256 18 12 4 6 16 11 117 PCE Adj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol. : 7 1381 - 20 75 1382 20 12 4 6 16 11 117 I II II II I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.85 1.00 0.76 C.85 1.00 1.00 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.95 0.95 0.76 Lanes: 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 2.96 0.04 0.55 0.18 0.27 0.59 0.41 1.00 Final Sat. : 1615 5700 1445 1615 5619 81 847 282 423 1070 735 1445 I II II II I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.24 0.01 0.05 0.25 0.25 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.08 Crit Moves: **** .... *.** Green Time: 7.0 93.3 93.3 7.0 93.3 93.3 30.7 30.7 30.7 30.7 30.7 30.7 Volume/Cap: 0.09 0.36 0.02 0.93 0.37 0.37 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.07 0.07 0.37 I II II II I Level Of Service Module: Delay/Veh: 41.0 6.7 5.1 97.1 6.7 6.7 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 30.3 User DelAdj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 41.0 6.7 5.1 97.1 6.7 6.7 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 30.3 DesignQueue: 1 38 1 6 38 1 1 0 0 1 1 7 Traffix 7.1.0427 (c) 1998 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RBWF & ASSOC. , IRVINE EX+FUT+PROJECT AM Wed Sep 1, 1999 19:09:36 Page 4-1' PASEO VILLAGE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY EXISTING + FUTURE PROJECTS + PROJECT AM PEAK Level Of Service Computation Report 1994 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #2 MONTEREY/PARK VIEW Cycle (sec) : 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X) : 0.497 Loss Time (sec) : 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) : 12.1 Optimal Cycle: 39 Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 2 0 2 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 I Volume Module: II II II i Base Vol: 60 493 42 165 771 63 55 77 56 14 19 24 Growth Adj: 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 Initial Bse: 83 682 58 228 1067 87 76 107 78 19 26 33 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PROJECT: 2 0 0 0 1 4 3 0 1 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 85 682 58 228 1068 91 79 107 79 19 26 33 User Adj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 85 682 53 228 1068 91 79 107 79 19 26 33 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 85 682 58 228 1068 91 79 107 79 19 26 33 PCE Adj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj : 1.00 1.05 1.00 1.03 1.05 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol. : 85 717 58 235 1122 91 79 107 79 19 26 33 I II I I II I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.85 1.00 0.76 0.85 1.00 0.76 0.71 0.94 0.94 0.37 0.92 0.92 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.58 0.42 1.00 0.44 0.56 Final Sat. : 1615 3800 1445 3230 3800 1445 1343 1027 759 697 770 978 I II II II I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.19 0.04 0.07 0.30 0.06 0.06 0.10 0.10 0.03 0.03 0.03 Crit Moves: ***- **** **** Green Time: 10.6 50.5 50.5 19.5 59.4 59.4 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 Volume/Cap: 0.50 0.37 0.08 0.37 0.50 0.11 0.28 0.50 0.50 0.13 0.16 0.16 I II II II I Level Of Service Module: Delay/Veh: 29.1 9.8 8.2 22.8 7.7 5.7 21.6 23.4 23.4 20.8 20.9 20.9 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 29.1 9.8 8.2 22.8 7.7 5.7 21.6 23.4 23.4 20.8 20.9 20.9 DesignQueue: 4 21 2 11 27 2 4 5 4 1 1 1 Traffix 7.1.0427 (c) 1998 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RBWF & ASSOC., IRVINE a3� EX+FUT+PROJECT AM Wed Sep 1, 1999 19:09:36 Page 5-1 , PASEO VILLAGE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY EXISTING + FUTURE PROJECTS + PROJECT AM PEAK Level Of Service Computation Report 1994 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #3 SR-111/FRED WARING Cycle (sec) : 140 Critical Vol./Cap. (X) : 0.535 Loss Time (sec) : 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) : 20.5 Optimal Cycle: 46 Level Of Service: C Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L T - R L - T - R L - T - R I it II II I Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 Lanes: 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 2 0 1 2 0 2 0 2 I II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 32 827 30 228 829 20 21 17 15 40 50 269 Growth Adj: 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 Initial Bse: 44 1145 42 316 1148 28 29 24 21 55 69 372 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PROJECT: 0 1 4 2 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 Initial Fut: 44 1146 46 318 1149 28 29 24 21 58 69 373 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 44 1146 46 318 1149 28 29 24 21 58 69 373 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 44 1146 46 318 1149 28 29 24 21 58 69 373 PCE Adj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.03 1.10 1.10 1.03 1.10 1.10 1.03 1.05 1.00 1.03 1.05 1.13 Final Vol. : 46 1260 50 327 1263 30 30 25 21 60 73 422 I II I I II I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.85 0.99 0.99 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.76 0.85 1.00 0.76 Lanes: 2.00 2.89 0.11 2.00 2.93 0.07 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Final Sat. : 3230 5428 215 3230 5568 132 3230 3800 1445 3230 3800 2890 I II II II I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.23 0.23 0.10 0.23 0.23 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.15 Crit Moves: *••. r•.• +•e• r+.+ Green Time: 7.0 58.6 58.6 25.6 77.1 77.1 7.0 25.8 25.8 18.1 36.9 36.9 Volume/Cap: 0.28 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.41 0.41 0.19 0.04 0.08 0.14 0.07 0.55 I II II II I Level Of Service Module: Delay/Veh: 41.7 20.1 20.1 34.5 11.8 11.8 41.3 30.3 . 30.5 35.0 25.0 29.4 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 41.7 20.1 20.1 34.5 11.8 11.8 41.3 30.3 30.5 35.0 25.0 29.4 DesignQueue: 3 61 2 21 47 1 2 2 1 4 4 25 Traffix 7.1.0427 (c) 1998 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RBWF & ASSOC., IRVINE EX+FUT+PROJECT AM Wed Sep 1, 1999 19:09:36 Page 6-1• PASEO VILLAGE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY EXISTING + FUTURE PROJECTS + PROJECT AM PEAK Level Of Service Computation Report 1994 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #4 TOWN CENTER/FRED WARING Cycle (sec) : 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X) : 0.220 Loss Time (sec) : 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) : 13.9 Optimal Cycle: 82 Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 25 25 7 56 56 Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 I II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 24 6 85 12 10 9 4 201 56 133 292 12 Growth Adj : 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 Initial Bse: 33 8 118 17 14 12 6 278 78 184 404 17 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PROJECT: 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 6 0 3 4 0 Initial Fut: 33 8 121 17 14 12 6 284 78 187 408 17 User Adj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 33 8 121 17 14 12 6 284 78 187 408 17 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 33 8 121 17 14 12 6 284 78 187 408 17 PCE Adj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.05 1.00 1.00 1.05 1.00 Final Vol. : 33 8 121 17 14 12 6 298 78 187 429 17 I II II II I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.79 1.00 0.76 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.85 1.00 0.76 0.85 1.00 0.76 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.39 0.33 0.28 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat. : 1496 1900 1445 633 521 447 1615 3800 1445 1615 3800 1445 I II II II I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.00 0.08 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.08 0.05 0.12 0.11 0.01 Crit Moves: .... •... .... Green Time: 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 7.0 25.0 25.0 38.0 56.0 56.0 Volume/Cap: 0.08 0.02 0.30 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.05 0.31 0.22 0.30 0.20 0.02 I II II II I Level Of Service Module: Delay/Veh: 17.1 16.8 18.4 17.2 17.2 17.2 28.0 19.8 19.3 14.1 7.1 6.3 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 17.1 16.8 18.4 17.2 17.2 17.2 28.0 19.8 19.3 14.1 7.1 6.3 DesignQueue: 1 0 5 1 1 0 0 13 3 7 11 0 Traffix 7.1.0427 (c) 1998 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RBWF 6 ASSOC., IRVINE dli\ EX+FUT+PROJECT AM Wed Sep 1, 1999 19:09:36 Page 7-1 • PASEO VILLAGE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY EXISTING + FUTURE PROJECTS + PROJECT AM PEAR Level Of Service Computation Report 1994 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #5 MONTEREY/FRED WARING Cycle (sec) : 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X) : 0.409 Loss Time (sec) : 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) : 18.3 Optimal Cycle: 46 Level Of Service: C Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - .T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I I I II II I Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 Lanes: 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 2 0 1 2 0 2 0 1 I II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 51 233 116 181 415 96 54 194 49 153 410 140 Growth Adj: 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.39 1.38 Initial Bse: 71 323 161 251 574 133 75 269 68 212 568 194 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PROJECT: 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 2 1 Initial Fut: 72 324 161 251 575 134 75 269 69 212 570 195 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 72 324 161 251 575 134 75 269 69 212 570 195 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 72 324 161 251 575 134 75 269 69 212 570 195 PCE Adj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.03 1.10 1.10 1.03 1.10 1.00 1.03 1.05 1.00 1.03 1.05 1.00 Final Vol. : 74 356 177 258 633 134 77 282 69 218 598 195 I II II II I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.85 0.95 0.95 0.85 1.00 0.76 0.85 1.00 0.76 0.85 1.00 0.76 Lanes: 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 . 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat. : 3230 3617 1798 3230 5700 1445 3230 3800 1445 3230 3800 1445 I II II II I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.10 0.10 0.08 0.11 0.09 0.02 0.07 0.05 0.07 0.16 0.13 Crit Moves: +•t. *+•• •44* *44* Green Time: 7.0 23.8 23.8 19.3 36.0 36.0 7.0 26.5 26.5 18.5 38.0 38.0 Volume/Cap: 0.33 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.31 0.26 0.34 0.28 0.18 0.36 0.41 0.36 I II II II I Level Of Service Module: Delay/Veh: 28.9 21.0 21.0 23.1 14.9 14.6 29.0 18.9 18.4 23.2 14.9 14.5 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 28.9 21.0 21.0 23.1 14.9 14.6 29.0 18.9 18.4 23.2 14.9 14.5 DesignQueue: 4 15 8 12 23 5 4 12 3 10 21 7 Traffix 7.1.0427 (c) 1998 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RBWF & ASSOC. , IRVINE EX+FUT+PROJECT PM Wed Sep 1, 1999 19:11:37 Page 1-1- PASEO VILLAGE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY EXISTING + FURTURE PROJECTS + PROJECT PM PEAK Scenario Report Scenario: EX+FUT+PROJECT PM Command: EX + FUT + PROJECT PM Volume: EX + FUT + PROJECT PM Geometry: Default Geometry Impact Fee: Default Impact Fee Trip Generation: Default Trip Generation Trip Distribution: Default Trip Distribution Paths: Default Paths Routes: Default Routes Configuration: EX + FUT + PROJECT PM Traffix 7.1.0427 (c) 1998 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RBWF & ASSOC., IRVINE EX+FUT+PROJECT PM Wed Sep 1, 1999 19:11:37 Page 2-1 - PASEO VILLAGE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY EXISTING + FURTURE PROJECTS + PROJECT PM PEAK Impact Analysis Report Level Of Service Intersection Base Future Change Del/ V/ Del/ V/ in LOS Veh C LOS Veh C # 1 SR-111/PARK VIEW B 10.8 0.613 B 10.9 0.617 + 0.151 D/V # 2 MONTEREY/PARK VIEW B 12.0 0.566 B 12.1 0.568 + 0.119 D/V # 3 SR-111/FRED WARING D 28.6 0.886 D 28.7 0.889 + 0.115 D/V # 4 TOWN CENTER/FRED WARING C 17.8 0.393 C 17.9 0.394 + 0.060 D/V # 5 MONTEREY/FRED WARING C 21.0 0.699 C 21.0 0.700 + 0.017 D/V Traffix 7.1.0427 (c) 1998 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RBWF & ASSOC., IRVINE EX+FUT+PROJECT PM Wed Sep 1, 1999 19:11:37 Page 3-1- PASEO VILLAGE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY EXISTING + FURTURE PROJECTS + PROJECT PM PEAK Level Of Service Computation Report 1994 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #1 SR-111/PAR{ VIEW Cycle (sec) : 140 Critical Vol./Cap. (X) : 0.617 Loss Time (sec) : 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) • 10.9 Optimal Cycle: 44 Level Of Service: B Approach: North Sound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Lanes: 1 0 3 0 1 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 I II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 14 1442 30 95 1402 46 29 9 4 26 13 112 Growth Adj : 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 Initial Bse: 19 1996 42 131 1941 64 40 12 6 36 18 155 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PROJECT: 0 2 2 3 2 0 0 1 0 1 1 2 Initial Fut: 19 1993 44 134 1943 64 40 13 6 37 19 157 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 19 1998 44 134 1943 64 40 13 6 37 19 157 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 19 1998 44 134 1943 64 40 13 6 37 19 157 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj : 1.00 1.13 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol. : 19 2198 44 134 2137 - 70 40 13 6 37 19 157 I II II II I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.85 1.00 0.76 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.84 0.84 0.76 Lanes: 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 2.90 0.10 0.68 0.22 0.10 0.66 0.34 1.00 Final Sat. : 1615 5700 1445 1615 5519 181 963 313 144 1055 542 1445 I II II II I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.39 0.03 0.08 0.39 0.39 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.11 Crit Moves: •+•• Green Time: 7.0 87.5 87.5 18.8 99.3 99.3 24.7 24.7 24.7 24.7 24.7 24.7 Volume/Cap: 0.24 0.62 0.05 0.62 0.55 0.55 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.20 0.20 0.62 I it it II I Level Of Service Module: Delay/Veh: 41.6 10.6 6.6 40.6 6.3 6.3 32.1 32.1 32.1 31.9 31.9 37.6 User DelAdj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 41.6 10.6 6.6 40.6 6.3 6.3 32.1 32.1 32.1 31.9 31.9 37.6 DesignQueue: 1 71 1 9 54 2 3 1 0 2 1 10 Traffix 7.1.0427 (c) 1998 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RBWF & ASSOC., IRVINE -`-‘,'.5r) EX+FUT+PROJECT PM Wed Sep 1, 1999 19:11:37 Page 4-1. PASEO VILLAGE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY EXISTING + FURTURE PROJECTS + PROJECT PM PEAK Level Of Service Computation Report 1994 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #2 MONTEREY/PARK VIEW Cycle (sec) : 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X) : 0.568 Loss Time (sec) : 9 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) : 12.1 Optimal Cycle: 39 Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 2 0 2 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 Volume Module: II I I II Base Vol: 75 891 35 59 685 47 84 29 67 38 37 91 Growth Adj: 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 Initial Bse: 104 1233 48 82 948 65 116 40 93 53 51 126 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PROJECT: 3 0 0 0 0 3 4 0 2 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 107 1233 48 82 948 68 120 40 95 53 51 126 User Adj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 107 1233 48 82 948 68 120 40 95 53 51 126 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 107 1233 48 82 948 68 120 40 95 53 51 126 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj : 1.00 1.05 1.00 1.03 1.05 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol. : 107 1295 48 84 996 68 120 40 95 53 51 126 I II II II I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.85 1.00 0.76 0.85 1.00 0.76 0.42 0.90 0.90 0.51 0.89 0.89 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.30 0.70 1.00 0.29 0.71 Final Sat. : 1615 3800 1445 3230 3800 1445 799 507 1203 969 487 1204 I II II II I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.07 0.34 0.03 0.03 0.26 0.05 0.15 0.08 0.08 0.05 0.10 0.10 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green Time: 10.0 58.3 58.3 7.0 55.3 55.3 25.7 25.7 25.7 25.7 25.7 25.7 Volume/Cap: 0.66 0.58 0.06 0.37 0.47 0.09 0.58 0.31 0.31 0.21 0.41 0.41 I II II II I Level Of Service Module: Delay/Veh: 34.6 8.8 5.8 29.2 8.9 6.8 24.0 19.5 19.5 18.9 20.3 20.3 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 34.6 8.8 5.8 29.2 8.9 6.8 24.0 19.5 19.5 18.9 20.3 20.3 DesignQueue: 5 33 1 4 27 2 5 2 4 2 2 5 Traffix 7.1.0427 (c) 1998 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RBWF & ASSOC. , IRVINE EX+FUT+PROJECT PM Wed Sep 1, 1999 19:11:37 Page 5-1 - PASEO VILLAGE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY EXISTING + FURTURE PROJECTS + PROJECT PM PEAK Level Of Service Computation Report 1994 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #3 SR-111/FRED WARING Cycle (sec) : 140 Critical Vol./Cap. (X) : 0.889 Loss Time (sec) : 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) : 28.7 Optimal Cycle: 122 Level Of Service: D Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 Lanes: 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 2 0 1 2 0 2 0 2 I II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 57 1293 125 456 1044 75 98 117 70 190 143 338 Growth Adj : 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 Initial Bse: 79 1790 173 631 1445 104 136 162 97 263 198 468 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PROJECT: 0 2 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 2 Initial Fut: 79 1792 176 633 1446 104 136 162 97 266 198 470 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 79 1792 176 633 1446 104 136 162 97 266 198 470 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 79 1792 176 633 1446 104 136 162 97 266 198 470 PCE Adj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.03 1.10 1.10 1.03 1.10 1.10 1.03 1.05 1.00 1.03 1.05 1.13 Final Vol. : 81 1971 194 652 1591 114 140 170 97 274 208 531 I II II II I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.85 0.99 0.99 0.85 0.99 0.99 0.65 1.00 0.76 0.85 1.00 0.76 Lanes: 2.00 2.73 0.27 2.00 2.80 0.20 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Final Sat. : 3230 5137 506. 3230 5256 377 3230 3800 1445 3230 3800 2890 I II II II I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.38 0.36 0.20 0.30 0.30 0.04 0.04 0.07 0.08 0.05 0.18 Crit Moves: t". ..... ++'** sre♦ Green Time: 7.0 60.3 60.3 31.8 85.1 85.1 7.0 10.0 10.0 25.9 28.9 28.9 Volume/Cap: 0.50 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.50 0.50 0.87 0.63 0.94 0.46 0.27 0.89 I II II II I Level Of Service Module: Delay/Veh: 43.9 27.0 27.0 43.1 10.1 10.1 67.2 44.0 91.6 33.2 30.2 45.8 User DelAdj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 43.9 27.0 27.0 43.1 10.1 10.1 67.2 44.0 91.6 33.2 30.2 45.8 DesignQueue: 6 97 10 41 53 4 10 12 7 18 13 34 Traffix 7.1.0427 (c) 1998 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RBWF & ASSOC., IRVINE K" v EX+FUT+PROJECT PM Wed Sep 1, 1999 19:11:37 Page 6-1 - PASEO VILLAGE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY EXISTING + FURTURE PROJECTS + PROJECT PM PEAK Level Of Service Computation Report 1994 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #4 TOWN CENTER/FRED WARING Cycle (sec) : 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X) : 0.394 Loss Time (sec) : 9 (Y+R - 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) : 17.9 Optimal Cycle: 82 Level Of Service: C Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 25 25 7 56 56 Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 I II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 170 16 161 18 11 15 23 495 114 147 431 31 Growth Adj: 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 Initial Bse: 235 22 223 25 15 21 32 685 158 203 597 43 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PROJECT: 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 5 0 6 5 0 Initial Fut: 235 22 226 25 15 21 32 690 158 209 602 43 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 235 22 226 25 15 21 32 690 158 209 602 43 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 235 22 226 25 15 21 32 690 158 209 602 43 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.05 1.00 1.00 1.05 1.00 Final Vol. : 235 22 226 - 25 15 21 32 725 158 209 632 43 I II II II I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.72 1.00 0.76 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.85 1.00 0.76 0.85 1.00 0.76 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.41 0.25 0.34 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat. : 1360 1900 1445 635 381 534 1615 3800 1445 1615 3800 1445 I II II II I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.17 0.01 0.16 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.02 0.19 0.11 0.13 0.17 0.03 Crit Moves: **** ***+ Green Time: 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 7.0 25.0 25.0 38.0 56.0 56.0 Volume/Cap: 0.62 0.04 0.56 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.28 0.76 0.44 0.34 0.30 0.05 I II II II I Level Of Service Module: Delay/Veh: 22.4 16.9 21.2 17.4 17.4 17.4 28.9 25.0 21.0 14.4 7.5 6.4 User DelAdj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 22.4 16.9 21.2 17.4 17.4 17.4 28.9 25.0 21.0 14.4 7.5 6.4 DesignQueue: 10 1 9 1 1 1 2 32 7 7 16 1 Traffix 7.1.0427 (c) 1998 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RBWF 6 ASSOC., IRVINE EX+FUT+PROJECT PM Wed Sep 1, 1999 19:11:37 Page 7-1- PASEO VILLAGE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY EXISTING + FURTURE PROJECTS + PROJECT PM PEAK Level Of Service Computation Report 1994 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #5 MONTEREY/FRED WARING Cycle (sec) : 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X) : 0.700 Loss Time (sec) : 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) : 21.0 Optimal Cycle: 59 Level Of Service: C Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I I I II II I Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 Lanes: 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 2 0 1 2 0 2 0 1 I II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 75 559 249 195 442 141 182 560 65 199 425 198 Growth Adj: 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 Initial Bse: 104 774 345 270 612 195 252 775 90 275 588 274 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PROJECT: 1 2 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 Initial Fut: 105 776 345 271 613 195 252 776 91 275 589 275 User Adj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 105 776 345 271 613 195 252 776 91 275 589 275 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 105 776 345 271 613 195 252 776 91 275 589 275 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj : 1.03 1.10 1.10 1.03 1.10 1.00 1.03 1.05 1.00 1.03 1.05 1.00 Final Vol. : 108 853 379 279 674 195 259 815 91 284 619 275 I II II II I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.85 0.95 0.95 0.85 1.00 0.76 0.85 1.00 0.76 0.85 1.00 0.76 Lanes: 2.00 2.08 0.92 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat. : 3230 3749 1666 3230 5700 1445 3230 3800 1445 3230 3800 1445 I II II II I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.23 0.23 0.09 0.12 0.13 0.08 0.21 0.06 0.09 0.16 0.19 Crit Moves• `t.. •.+• +•+• rr.r Green Time: 7.0 32.5 32.5 12.3 37.8 37.8 12.8 30.6 30.6 12.6 30.4 30.4 Volume/Cap: 0.48 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.31 0.36 0.63 0.70 0.21 0.70 0.54 0.63 I II II II I Level Of Service Module: Delay/Veh: 30.1 19.9 19.9 30.9 14.2 14.6 28.8 21.1 16.6 30.7 19.1 21.3 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 30.1 19.9 19.9 30.9 14.2 14.6 28.8 21.1 16.6 30.7 19.1 21.3 DesignQueue: 6 34 15 14 24 7 13 33 4 14 25 11 Traffix 7.1.0427 (c) 1998 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RBWF 6 ASSOC., IRVINE COMMONWEALTH TITLE COMPANY 72-855 Fred Wart ve,Suite A5 I Palm Desert,CA 92260 760-836-3726 I fax 760-341-3215 V Commonwealth September 17, 1999 RECEIVED SEP 2 0 1999 To: City Council Members City of Palm Desert COMMUNITYCEVELOPM:NTDEPARTMENT 73510 Fred Waring Drive CITY OF PALM DESERT Palm Desert, Ca 92260 Re: Paseo Village, a proposed Continuing Care Retirement Community Fred Waring Drive at Fairhaven Drive Dear City Council Members: In researching the surrounding properties of The Fountains at the Carlotta Retirement Center, it is my opinion the property values have not diminished due to their location. The attached property comparables have been comprised from the public documents obtained at the Riverside County Recorder's Office. There have been many sales reported to the Palm Desert MLS Board of Realtors in the last six months and prices are competitive in the current Real Estate market. -Si cerely, Patt Ke ich, Busine Development Representative PK/abm att: t • . ,i :i :f; i ,.55"c h�40i'Aps 1.55E i 'S7 C Q—.0 ;: t hd S irr •n ic3 - ;• ^c; .;!1;at. of tY:` 286I 'C+iti LSZ£G'CN 'r, S -itic; Pia SC'Sd Zi!1'�c c:A i ' c qi-i:; at. ;if', 90i£t •Ch 'Ad e9-59/i9 lid ifiririi f fi/f �1 ' - ERNE-.. i• wail • Z , !,1.1/1". '•.,, a 'tla41 ...s.'\</ 5 , : ievilWV, j 9 i SS" 12'921 SI .i; 9£ r; O f£ O — I / 0 1111 ililStt3Y ; , m r�$ ® • ` I 'S S.i tl S7/Li S II r:q4:+� M7-4r_ib . — • l Yi li. I t t,XI ,, 4 tt!•! Sri IS1,3Y I o 11 m Ss :v 2?'0i ` 6 ^ S{ 1 ray •ia4 •• . , y N S "eve "eCe • N. , Q I i 0Ci = .1 \vi f 's331111010 31IS 0110110S 10 1114S-101 1V301 lIt-at0 A3530 N1Vd JO A113 N31N A101o3 ION AVN S1331Vd S.NOSS3SSV Cc 6:9 911-il0. 39'8"SS'1 Ol'03S .NNONS VIVO 31t l0 /3000330 311 101 9 0 - 0 0-9!6 V 8. 1 O.NOSSY Si 11I11Nr11 ON 'A1N0 S3S0dO04 1113NSS35SV 101 0311d311 Sri OVA SIN! • INS MAP IS Pa. 632- 39 A"a'IANT ^"" o r R. S//2 SEC. /D, I5S.,R 6E. 7R.A. ON-/lJ 6Jt-OJ I1.116 4044, yog .. i .. rDao °1.00� nab ; O ®� ° II n* : � ©: 000 o` R Q N of ` �`• O i e 1: 2 E. N V O QQ C q o1 0 tl ^1 V O O C O• r w I O ° ..9 ,I'..., f y.11 r..° - 1.040`aaz saes sa.» 1 _ l..° Is 1, et a L CARLOTTA . rar•aY4 i DR/YE _ ►-� �•' I ,�r�� ('f wK W .. _ Z L.. >>� O '�.. .y ,.Q;M1l !MA 1w Y... ; (air( �Pe .. - • �p 0o M 1 •• j • b Q _ ® - ® - ® ®= ®' ®e / " L: �� ® "- • slot'© O ®'� ® nl \ MAIM El or. IM.•0 1 -��'.. .. - .. - -. - + ��ti 0 1e.r11.is404.v..i I 1 I I 1 • lot..B 213/34-15 Tract Na 21339 . 1 1 • 1 I 1 i ASSESSOR'S MAP 3..63P PC.J9 i 'fRIYERS/DE COUVT[ CALM 4,. f 1 I MAY 1990 1 1 \-'-r- ---------7----,,,_ , 71,\ • Prope Profile - Riverside LANDAMERICA Prepared For: Acnt Rep: Attention C/S Rep: ****************************************************************************** * * * APN : 632-422-011 Phone : * * Ownerl: ' ,CASTELLANOS TRUST OwnShp: * * Owner2: Pg-Grd: /819-A5 * * Site : 75625 DEMPSEY DR Census: 0449.03 * * : PALM DESERT CA 92211 Zoning: CPS * * Mail : PO BOX 14030 Tract : 25436-00 * * : PALM DESERT CA 92255 Lot/B1: L-0035/ * * Legal : .17 ACRES IN LOT 35 MB 231/067 TR 25436 * * FloodP: 060245 2255 * * * * * * Property Characteristics * * * * * * Use : VAC RESIDENTIAL * * Yr Blt: SqFeet: GarSqF: * * BedBth: Addtnl: GarTyp: * * #Story: Roof CarSqF: * * #Units: Ht/C1 : GarTy2: * * Lotsz : 7,405 FirePl: OutImp: * * Gas Pool StSurf: * * Sewer : View MscBdg: * * Electr: * * Water : * * * * * * Sale/Loan Information * * * * * * Last Trans W/O $: * * SaleDt: 07/30/99 Doc# : 341207 Buyer : ' ,CASTELLANOS TR * * SaleAm: $50, 000 F $/SqFt: Seller: HAMILTON,AARON D * * 1st Td: LoanTy: Lender: * * +Addl: PrevDt: 02/09/96 + Title : FIDELITY NATIONA * * PrevAm: $205,000 F * * * * * * Assessment/Tax Information * * * * Assd : $35,373 Tax : $619.88 * * Land : $35,373 Status: CUR * * Improv: TRA : 018178 * * perc: 0% Exempt: * * TaxYr : 98-99 * * * ****************************************************************************** THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS SOURCED FROM PUBLIC DOCUMENTS AND IS NOT GUARANTEED Copyright (C) 1998 Acxiom Corporation ' Prope Profile - Riverside LANDAMERICA Prepared For: Acnt Rep: Attention C/S Rep: ****************************************************************************** * * * APN : 632-390-011 Phone : * * Owneri: RHODES TRUST OwnShp: * * Owner2: Pg-Grd: /819-A4 * * Site : 41250 CARLOTTA DR Census: 0449.033 * * : PALM DESERT CA 92211 Zoning: CPS * * Mail : 41250 CARLOTTA DR Tract : 21338-00 * * : PALM DESERT CA 92211 Lot/B1: L-0011/ * * Legal : LOT 11 MB 215/034 TR 21338 * * FloodP: 060245 2255 * * * * * * Property Characteristics * * * * * * Use : SINGLE RESIDENCE * * Yr Blt: 1990 SqFeet: 2,562 GarSqF: 621 * * BedBth: 4/2.7 Addtnl: GarTyp: ATTACHED * * #Story: 1 Roof : TILE CarSqF: * * #Units: 1 Ht/C1 : B GarTy2: * * Lotsz : 7,405 FirePl: Y OutImp: * * Gas : DEVELOPED Pool : Y StSurf: YES * * Sewer : DEVELOPED View MscBdg: * * Electr: UNDERGRND * * Water : DEVELOPED * * * * * * Sale/Loan Information * * * * * * Last Trans W/O $: * * SaleDt: 06/28/99 Doc# : 287778 Buyer : RHODES TRUST * * SaleAm: $275,000 F $/SqFt: $107.34 Seller: DEEB,GARY P & KA * * 1st Td: LoanTy: Lender: * * +Addl: PrevDt: Title : COMMONWEALTH LAN * * PrevAm: * * * * * * Assessment/Tax Information * * * * Assd : $293,696 Tax : $3,485.10 * * Land : $79,093 Status: CUR * * Improv: $214,603 TRA : 018175 * * perc: 73% Exempt: * * TaxYr : 98-99 * * * ****************************************************************************** THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS SOURCED FROM PUBLIC DOCUMENTS AND IS NOT GUARANTEED Copyright (C) 1998 Acxiom Corporation Prope Profile - Riverside LANDAMERICA Prepared For: Acnt Rep: Attention C/S Rep: ****************************************************************************** * * * APN : 632-361-011 Phone : * * Ownerl: NEWBY,RICAHRD W & VICTORIA G OwnShp: * * Owner2: Pg-Grd: /819-A5 * * Site : 75712 EASY ST Census: 0449.033 * * : PALM DESERT CA 92211 Zoning: CPS * * Mail : 75712 EASY ST Tract : 21338-01 * * : PALM DESERT CA 92211 Lot/B1: L-0011/ * * Legal : LOT 11 MB 192/075 TR 21338-1 * * FloodP: 060245 2255 * * * * * * Property Characteristics * * * * * * Use : SINGLE RESIDENCE * * Yr Blt: 1989 SqFeet: 1,418 GarSqF: 460 * * BedBth: 3/1.7 Addtnl: GarTyp: ATTACHED * * #Story: 1 Roof : TILE CarSqF: * * #Units: 1 Ht/C1 : B GarTy2: * * Lotsz : 7,405 FirePl: Y OutImp: * * Gas : DEVELOPED Pool : Y StSurf: YES * * Sewer : DEVELOPED View MscBdg: * * Electr: UNDERGRND * * Water : DEVELOPED * * * * * * Sale/Loan Information * * * * * * Last Trans W/O $: * * SaleDt: 05/01/98 Doc# : 172565 Buyer : NEWBY,RICAHRD W * * SaleAm: $147, 000 F $/SqFt: $103.67 Seller: REEVES,ALLISON * * 1st Td: $144,590 LoanTy: FHA/FIX/ Lender: COUNTRYWDE HM LN * * +Addl: PrevDt: 05/17/96 Title : ORANGE COAST TIT * * PrevAm: * * * * * * Assessment/Tax Information * * * * Assd : $93, 956 Tax : $1,358.92 * * Land : $23,950 Status: CUR * * Improv: $70, 006 TRA : 018182 * * perc: 74% Exempt: * * TaxYr : 98-99 * * * ****************************************************************************** THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS SOURCED FROM PUBLIC DOCUMENTS AND IS NOT GUARANTEED Copyright (C) 1998 Acxiom Corporation Prope Profile - Riverside LANDAMERICA Prepared For: Acnt Rep: Attention C/S Rep: ****************************************************************************** * * * APN : 632-361-016 Phone : * * Ownerl: MCILROY,STEVE A & JEANETTE M OwnShp: * * Owner2: Pg-Grd: /819-A5 * * Site : 75685 DOLMAR CT Census: 0449.033 * * : PALM DESERT CA 92211 Zoning: CPS * * Mail : 75685 DOLMAR CT Tract : 21338-01 * * : PALM DESERT CA 92211 Lot/B1: L-0016/ * * Legal : LOT 16 MB 192/075 TR 21338-1 * * FloodP: 060245 2255 * * * * * * Property Characteristics * * * * * * Use : SINGLE RESIDENCE * * Yr Blt: 1990 SqFeet: 2,119 GarSqF: 600 * * BedBth: 3/2.7 Addtnl: GarTyp: ATTACHED * * #Story: 2 Roof : TILE CarSqF: * * #Units: 1 Ht/C1 : B GarTy2: * * Lotsz : 7,840 FirePl: Y OutImp: * * Gas : DEVELOPED Pool StSurf: YES * * Sewer : DEVELOPED View MscBdg: * * Electr: UNDERGRND * * Water : DEVELOPED * * * * * * Sale/Loan Information * * * * * * Last Trans W/O $: * * SaleDt: 04/01/99 Doc# : 137814 Buyer : MCILROY,STEVE A * * SaleAm: $228, 000 F $/SqFt: $107.60 Seller: KIM,SUNG T & KEI * * 1st Td: $216,600 LoanTy: /FIX/ Lender: NORWEST MORTGAGE * * +Addl: PrevDt: 11/23/94 Title : FIRST AMERICAN * * PrevAm: $182, 000 F * * * * * * Assessment/Tax Information * * * * Assd : $203, 938 Tax : $2,769.02 * * Land : $52,617 Status: CUR * * Improv: $151,321 TRA : 018182 * * perc: 749,s Exempt: * * TaxYr : 98-99 * * * ****************************************************************************** THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS SOURCED FROM PUBLIC DOCUMENTS AND IS NOT GUARANTEED Copyright (C) 1998 Acxiom Corporation Prope _ Profile - Riverside LANDAMERICA Prepared For: Acnt Rep: Attention C/S Rep: ****************************************************************************** * * * APN : 632-361-031 Phone : (909) 337-9242 * * Ownerl: WALKER TRUST OwnShp: * * Owner2: Pg-Grd: 203-F4/819-A5 * * Site : 75746 DUVAL CT Census: 0449.033 * * : PALM DESERT CA 92211 Zoning: CPS * * Mail : 45120 SAN PABLO AVE Tract : 21338-01 * * : PALM DESERT CA 92260 Lot/B1: L-0031/ * * Legal : LOT 31 MB 192/075 TR 21338-1 * * FloodP: 060245 2255 * * * * * * Property Characteristics * * * * * * Use : SINGLE RESIDENCE * * Yr Blt: 1990 SqFeet: 1,851 GarSqF: 400 * * BedBth: 3/1.7 Addtnl: GarTyp: ATTACHED * * #Story: 1 Roof : TILE CarSqF: * * #Units: 1 Ht/C1 : B GarTy2: * * Lotsz : 9,583 FirePl: Y OutImp: * * Gas : DEVELOPED Pool : Y StSurf: YES * * Sewer : DEVELOPED View MscBdg: * * Electr: UNDERGRND * * Water : DEVELOPED * * * * * * Sale/Loan Information * * * * * * Last Trans W/O $: * * SaleDt: 11/12/98 Doc# : 490905 Buyer : WALKER TRUST * * SaleAm: $182,500 F $/SqFt: $98.60 Seller: PRICHARD,ANNE-MA * * 1st Td: $100, 000 LoanTy: /FIX/ Lender: FIRST NATL BANK * * +Addl: PrevDt: 06/28/96 Title : ORANGE COAST TIT * * PrevAm: $154,000 * * * * * * Assessment/Tax Information * * * * Assd : $160,221 Tax : $2, 157.68 * * Land : $41,626 Status: CUR * * Improv: $118,595 TRA : 018182 * * perc: 74% Exempt: * * TaxYr : 98-99 * * * ****************************************************************************** THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS SOURCED FROM PUBLIC DOCUMENTS AND IS NOT GUARANTEED Copyright (C) 1998 Acxiom Corporation I ' Prope Profile - Riverside LANDAMERICA Prepared For: Acnt Rep: Attention C/S Rep: ****************************************************************************** * * * APN : 632-390-026 Phone : * * Ownerl: MASON,BRADLEY W & KATHLEEN M OwnShp: JOINT * * Owner2: Pg-Grd: /819-A4 * * Site : 41215 CARLOTTA DR Census: 0449.033 * * : PALM DESERT CA 92211 Zoning: CPS * * Mail : 41215 CARLOTTA DR Tract : 21338-00 * * : PALM DESERT CA 92211 Lot/B1: L-0026/ * * Legal : LOT 26 MB 215/034 TR 21338 * * FloodP: 060245 2255 * * * * * * Property Characteristics * * * * * * Use : SINGLE RESIDENCE * * Yr Blt: 1990 SqFeet: 2, 900 GarSqF: 644 * * BedBth: 4/3 .0 Addtnl: GarTyp: ATTACHED * * #Story: 1 Roof : TILE CarSqF: * * #Units: 1 Ht/C1 : B GarTy2: * * Lotsz : 8,276 FirePl: Y OutImp: * * Gas : DEVELOPED Pool : Y StSurf: YES * * Sewer : DEVELOPED View : FAIRWAY MscBdg: * * Electr: UNDERGRND * * Water : DEVELOPED * * * * * * Sale/Loan Information * * * * * * Last Trans W/O $: * * SaleDt: 04/30/98 Doc# : 170822 Buyer : MASON,BRADLEY W * * SaleAm: $279, 000 F $/SqFt: $96 .21 Seller: BORER TRUST * * 1st Td: $223,200 LoanTy: /FIX/ Lender: HEADLANDS MTG * * +Addl: PrevDt: Title : FIRST AMERICAN * * PrevAm: * * * * * * Assessment/Tax Information * * * * Assd : $275,000 Tax : $3,197.74 * * Land : $70,015 Status: CUR * * Improv: $204,985 TRA : 018175 * * perc: 749‘ Exempt: * * TaxYr : 98-99 * * * ****************************************************************************** THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS SOURCED FROM PUBLIC DOCUMENTS AND IS NOT GUARANTEED Copyright (C) 1998 Acxiom Corporation Prope Profile - Riverside LANDAMERICA Prepared For: Acnt Rep: Attention C/S Rep: ****************************************************************************** * * * APN : 632-390-037 Phone : * * Ownerl: BABCOCK,RANDY & COLLEEN OwnShp: * * Owner2: Pg-Grd: /819-A4 * * Site : 41435 CARLOTTA DR Census: 0449.033 * * : PALM DESERT CA 92211 Zoning: CPS * * Mail : 41435 CARLOTTA DR Tract : 21338-00 * * : PALM DESERT CA 92211 Lot/B1: L-0037/ * * Legal : LOT 37 MB 215/034 TR 21338 * * FloodP: 060245 2255 * * * * * * Property Characteristics * * * * * * Use : SINGLE RESIDENCE * * Yr Blt: 1990 SqFeet: 2,646 GarSqF: 639 * * BedBth: 4/3 .0 Addtnl: GarTyp: ATTACHED * * #Story: 1 Roof : TILE CarSqF: * * #Units: 1 Ht/C1 : B GarTy2: * * Lotsz : 8,276 FirePl: Y OutImp: * * Gas : DEVELOPED Pool : Y StSurf: YES * * Sewer : DEVELOPED View : FAIRWAY MscBdg: * * Electr: UNDERGRND * * Water : DEVELOPED * * * * * * Sale/Loan Information * * * * * * Last Trans W/O $: * * SaleDt: 12/17/98 Doc# : 546896 Buyer : BABCOCK,RANDY & * * SaleAm: $272, 000 F $/SqFt: $102.80 Seller: BROGDON,HELEN B * * 1st Td: $240, 000 LoanTy: /FIX/ Lender: FRANKLIN LOAN * * +Addl: PrevDt: Title : ORANGE COAST TIT * * PrevAm: * * * * * * Assessment/Tax Information * * * * Assd : $245, 000 Tax : $2,862.24 * * Land : $65, 023 Status: CUR * * Improv: $179,977 TRA : 018175 * * perc: 739.5 Exempt: * * TaxYr : 98-99 * * * ****************************************************************************** THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS SOURCED FROM PUBLIC DOCUMENTS AND IS NOT GUARANTEED Copyright (C) 1998 Acxiom Corporation ' Prope Profile - Riverside LANDAMERICA Prepared For: Acnt Rep: Attention C/S Rep: ****************************************************************************** * * * APN : 632-400-002 Phone : (760) 776-1199 * * Ownerl: DAVID,BEVERLY OwnShp: * * Owner2: Pg-Grd: * * Site : 4 BELMONTE DR 92211 Census: 0449.033 * * : PALM DESERT CA 92211 Zoning: CPS * * Mail : 4 BELMONTE DR 92211 Tract : 24539-00 * * : PALM DESERT CA 92211 Lot/B1: L-0002/ * * Legal : .21 ACRES IN LOT 2 MB 222/076 TR 24539 * * FloodP: 060629 0003 * * * * * * Property Characteristics * * * * * * Use : SINGLE RESIDENCE * * Yr Blt: SqFeet: GarSqF: * * BedBth: Addtnl: GarTyp: * * #Story: Roof CarSqF: * * #Units: 1 Ht/C1 : GarTy2: * * Lotsz : 9, 147 FirePl: Outlmp: * * Gas Pool StSurf: * * Sewer : View MscBdg: * * Electr: * * Water : * * * * * * Sale/Loan Information * * * * * * Last Trans W/O $: * * SaleDt: 06/10/98 Doc# : 237608 Buyer : DAVID,BEVERLY * * SaleAm: $234,500 F $/SqFt: Seller: FISHER,NORMAN E * * 1st Td: $211,050 LoanTy: /FIX/ Lender: NORWEST MORTGAGE * * +Addl: PrevDt: 12/16/96 Title : FIRST AMERICAN * * PrevAm: $175,000 F * * * * * * Assessment/Tax Information * * * * Assd : $178,500 Tax : $2,084.68 * * Land : $45,911 Status: CUR * * Improv: $132,589 TRA : 018060 * * perc: 74% Exempt: * * TaxYr : 98-99 * * * ****************************************************************************** THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS SOURCED FROM PUBLIC DOCUMENTS AND IS NOT GUARANTEED Copyright (C) 1998 Acxiom Corporation 1 Prope Profile - Riverside LANDAMERICA Prepared For: Acnt Rep: Attention C/S Rep: ****************************************************************************** * * * APN : 632-400-009 Phone : * * Ownerl: HUTCHINSON TRUST OwnShp: * * Owner2: Pg-Grd: /818-J4 * Site : 18 BELMONTE DR Census: 0449.033 * * : PALM DESERT CA 92211 Zoning: CPS * * Mail : 18 BELMONTE DR Tract : 24539-00 * * : PALM DESERT CA 92211 Lot/B1: L-0009/ * * Legal : .21 ACRES IN LOT 9 MB 222/076 TR 24539 * * FloodP: 060629 0003 * * * * * * Property Characteristics * * * * * * Use : SINGLE RESIDENCE * * Yr Blt: 1992 SqFeet: 2,292 GarSqF: 600 * * BedBth: 3/2.5 Addtnl: GarTyp: ATTACHED * * #Story: 1 Roof : TILE CarSqF: * * #Units: 1 Ht/C1 : B GarTy2: * * Lotsz : 9,147 FirePl: Y OutImp: * * Gas : DEVELOPED Pool : Y StSurf: YES * * Sewer : DEVELOPED View MscBdg: * * Electr: UNDERGRND * * Water : DEVELOPED * * * * * * Sale/Loan Information * * * * * * Last Trans W/O $: * * SaleDt: 07/30/99 Doc# : 341800 Buyer : HUTCHINSON TRUST * * SaleAm: $271,500 F $/SqFt: $118.46 Seller: DICKSON,JAMES C * * 1st Td: LoanTy: Lender: * * +Addl: PrevDt: 04/30/97 Title : ORANGE COAST TIT * * PrevAm: $235,000 F * * * * * * Assessment/Tax Information * * * * Assd : $239,700 Tax : $2,802.98 * * Land : $61,220 Status: CUR * * Improv: $178,480 TRA : 018060 * * perc: 74% Exempt: * * TaxYr : 98-99 * * * ****************************************************************************** THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS SOURCED FROM PUBLIC DOCUMENTS AND IS NOT GUARANTEED Copyright (C) 1998 Acxiom Corporation ' Prope Profile - Riverside LANDAMERICA Prepared For: Acnt Rep: Attention C/S Rep: ****************************************************************************** * * * APN : 632-400-012 Phone : * * Ownerl: CHISHOLM,BRUCE D & JULIETTE T OwnShp: * * Owner2: Pg-Grd: /818-J4 * * Site : 24 BELMONTE DR Census: 0449.033 * * : PALM DESERT CA 92211 Zoning: CPS * * Mail : 24 BELMONTE DR Tract : 24539-00 * * : PALM DESERT CA 92211 Lot/B1: L-0012/ * * Legal : .21 ACRES IN LOT 12 MB 222/076 TR 24539 * * FloodP: 060629 0003 * * * * * * Property Characteristics * * * * * * Use : SINGLE RESIDENCE * * Yr Blt: 1995 SqFeet: 2,240 GarSqF: 493 * * BedBth: 4/2.0 Addtnl: GarTyp: ATTACHED * * #Story: 1 Roof : TILE CarSqF: * * #Units: 1 Ht/C1 : B GarTy2: * * Lotsz : 9,147 FirePl: Y Outlmp: * * Gas : DEVELOPED Pool : Y StSurf: YES * * Sewer : DEVELOPED View MscBdg: * * Electr: DEVELOPED * * Water : DEVELOPED * * * * * * Sale/Loan Information * * * * * * Last Trans W/O $: * * SaleDt: 02/26/99 Doc# : 77228 Buyer : CHISHOLM,BRUCE D * * SaleAm: $265, 000 F $/SqFt: $118.30 Seller: BAGHDASSARIAN,MA * * 1st Td: $251,750 LoanTy: /FIX/ Lender: STANDARD FED BK * * +Addl: PrevDt: 08/01/95 Title : ORANGE COAST TIT * * PrevAm: $208,727 F * * * * * * Assessment/Tax Information * * * * Assd : $216,403 Tax : $2,620.72 * * Land : $41,636 Status: CUR * * Improv: $174,767 TRA : 018060 * * perc: 80% Exempt: * * TaxYr : 98-99 * * * ****************************************************************************** THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS SOURCED FROM PUBLIC DOCUMENTS AND IS NOT GUARANTEED Copyright (C) 1998 Acxiom Corporation Prope Profile - Riverside LANDAMERICA Prepared For: Acnt Rep: Attention C/S Rep: ****************************************************************************** * * * APN : 632-400-023 Phone : * * Ownerl: ZEIGLER,GARTH P & LIBBY E OwnShp: * * Owner2: Pg-Grd: /818-J4 * * Site : 46 SUTTON PL E Census: 0449.033 * * : PALM DESERT CA 92211 Zoning: CPS * * Mail : 46 SUTTON PL E Tract : 24539-00 * * : PALM DESERT CA 92211 Lot/B1: L-0023/ * * Legal : .21 ACRES IN LOT 23 MB 222/076 TR 24539 * * FloodP: 060629 0004 * * * * * * Property Characteristics * * * * * * Use : SINGLE RESIDENCE * * Yr Blt: 1995 SqFeet: 2,240 GarSqF: 493 * * BedBth: 4/2.0 Addtnl: GarTyp: ATTACHED * * #Story: 1 Roof : TILE CarSqF: * * #Units: 1 Ht/C1 : B GarTy2: * * Lotsz : 9, 147 FirePl: Y OutImp: * * Gas : DEVELOPED Pool StSurf: YES * * Sewer : DEVELOPED View MscBdg: * * Electr: DEVELOPED * * Water : DEVELOPED * * * * * * Sale/Loan Information * * * * * * Last Trans W/O $: * * SaleDt: 02/26/99 Doc# : 76198 Buyer : ZEIGLER,GARTH P * * SaleAm: $280, 000 F $/SqFt: $125.00 Seller: KENTON,GEORGE H * * 1st Td: $224, 000 LoanTy: /VAR/ Lender: MERRILL LYNCH CR * * +Addl: $28, 000 PrevDt: 10/18/95 Title : ORANGE COAST TIT * * PrevAm: $230, 000 F * * * * * * Assessment/Tax Information * * * * Assd : $239,292 Tax : $2,798.42 * * Land : $52,023 Status: CUR * * Improv: $187,269 TRA : 018060 * * perc: 7817 Exempt: * * TaxYr : 98-99 * * * ****************************************************************************** THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS SOURCED FROM PUBLIC DOCUMENTS AND IS NOT GUARANTEED Copyright (C) 1998 Acxiom Corporation Prope Profile - Riverside LANDAMERICA Prepared For: Acnt Rep: Attention C/S Rep: ****************************************************************************** * * * APN : 632-400-034 Phone : * * Ownerl: HINTON,GREGORY T & SUSAN R OwnShp: * * Owner2: Pg-Grd: /818-J4 * * Site : 15 BELMONTE DR Census: 0449.033 * * : PALM DESERT CA 92211 Zoning: CPS * * Mail : 15 BELMONTE DR Tract : 24539-00 * * : PALM DESERT CA 92211 Lot/B1: L-0036/ * * Legal : .21 ACRES IN LOT 36 MB 222/076 TR 24539 * * FloodP: 060629 0003 * * * * * * Property Characteristics * * * * * * Use : SINGLE RESIDENCE * * Yr Blt: 1992 SqFeet: 2,132 GarSqF: 620 * * BedBth: 3/2.5 Addtnl: GarTyp: ATTACHED * * #Story: 1 Roof : TILE CarSqF: * * #Units: 1 Ht/C1 : B GarTy2: * * Lotsz : 9, 147 FirePl: Y OutImp: * * Gas : DEVELOPED Pool : Y StSurf: YES * * Sewer : DEVELOPED View MscBdg: * * Electr: UNDERGRND * * Water : DEVELOPED * * * * * * Sale/Loan Information * * * * * * Last Trans W/O $: * * SaleDt: 06/24/99 Doc# : 282391 Buyer : HINTON,GREGORY T * * SaleAm: $257,500 F $/SqFt: $120.78 Seller: WILDE TRUST * * 1st Td: $206, 000 LoanTy: /VAR/ Lender: FRANKLIN LOAN * * +Addl: PrevDt: 08/30/94 Title : ORANGE COAST TIT * * PrevAm: * * * * * * Assessment/Tax Information * * * * Assd : $182, 000 Tax : $2, 157.72 * * Land : $50, 014 Status: CUR * * Improv: $131, 986 TRA : 018060 * * perc: 7296- Exempt: * * TaxYr : 98-99 * * * ****************************************************************************** THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS SOURCED FROM PUBLIC DOCUMENTS AND IS NOT GUARANTEED Copyright (C) 1998 Acxiom Corporation • Prope: Profile - Riverside LANDAMERICA Prepared For: Acnt Rep: Attention C/S Rep: ****************************************************************************** * * * APN : 632-400-055 Phone : * * Ownerl: HOFFMAN,NEAL & MICHELLE OwnShp: * * Owner2: Pg-Grd: /818-J4 * * Site : 7 BELMONTE DR Census: 0449.033 * * : PALM DESERT CA 92211 Zoning: CPS * * Mail : 7 BELMONTE DR Tract : 24539-00 * * : PALM DESERT CA 92211 Lot/B1: L-0087/ * * Legal : .20 ACRES IN LOT 87 MB 222/076 TR 24539 * * FloodP: 060629 0003 * * * * * * Property Characteristics * * * * * * Use : SINGLE RESIDENCE * * Yr Blt: 1995 SqFeet: 2,240 GarSqF: 493 * * BedBth: 4/2.0 Addtnl: GarTyp: ATTACHED * * #Story: 1 Roof : TILE CarSqF: * * #Units: 1 Ht/C1 : B GarTy2: * * Lotsz : 8,712 FirePl: Y OutImp: * * Gas : DEVELOPED Pool : Y StSurf: YES * * Sewer : DEVELOPED View MscBdg: * * Electr: DEVELOPED * * Water : DEVELOPED * * * * * * Sale/Loan Information * * * * * * Last Trans W/O $: * * SaleDt: 06/12/98 Doc# : 241939 Buyer : HOFFMAN,NEAL & M * * SaleAm: $289,000 F $/SqFt: $129.02 Seller: MANKOFF TRUST * * 1st Td: $227,150 LoanTy: /FIX/ Lender: COUNTRYWDE HM LN * * +Addl: $18,500 PrevDt: 04/30/96 Title : ORANGE COAST TIT * * PrevAm: $240,000 * * * * * * Assessment/Tax Information * * * * Assd : $248,239 Tax : $2,976.74 * * Land : $52, 031 Status: CUR * * Improv: $196,208 TRA : 018060 * * perc: 796 Exempt: * * TaxYr : 98-99 * * * ****************************************************************************** THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS SOURCED FROM PUBLIC DOCUMENTS AND IS NOT GUARANTEED Copyright (C) 1998 Acxiom Corporation s Prope Profile - Riverside LANDAMERICA Prepared For: Acnt Rep: Attention C/S Rep: ****************************************************************************** * * * APN : 632-400-065 Phone : * * Ownerl: WEISLER,ARNOLD L & GAIL S OwnShp: * * Owner2: Pg-Grd: /818-J4 * * Site : 25 BELMONTE DR Census: 0449.033 * * : PALM DESERT CA 92211 Zoning: CPS * * Mail : 25 BELMONTE DR Tract : 24539-00 * * : PALM DESERT CA 92211 Lot/B1: L-0031/ * * Legal : .21 ACRES M/L IN POR LOT 30 AND LOT 31 MB 222/076 * * FloodP: 060629 0003 * * * * * * Property Characteristics * * * * * * Use : SINGLE RESIDENCE * * Yr Blt: 1995 SqFeet: 2,648 GarSqF: 590 * * BedBth: 4/2.5 Addtnl: GarTyp: * * #Story: 1 Roof : TILE CarSqF: * * #Units: 1 Ht/C1 : B GarTy2: * * Lotsz : 9,147 FirePl: Y Outlmp: * * Gas Pool StSurf: * * Sewer : View : MscBdg: * * Electr: * * Water : * * * * * * Sale/Loan Information * * * * * * Last Trans W/O $: * * SaleDt: 08/26/98 Doc# : 357483 Buyer : WEISLER,ARNOLD L * * SaleAm: $365,772 F $/SqFt: $138 .13 Seller: WEISLER TRUST * * 1st Td: $285,300 LoanTy: /FIX/ Lender: DOWNEY S&L * * +Addl: PrevDt: 10/31/95 Title : CHICAGO TITLE * * PrevAm: * * * * * * Assessment/Tax Information * * * * Assd : $301,716 Tax : $3,496 .50 * * Land : $52, 047 Status: CUR * * Improv: $249,669 TRA : 018060 * * perc: 829‘ Exempt: * * TaxYr : 98-99 * * * ****************************************************************************** THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS SOURCED FROM PUBLIC DOCUMENTS AND IS NOT GUARANTEED Copyright (C) 1998 Acxiom Corporation ' Prope Profile - Riverside LANDAMERICA Prepared For: Acnt Rep: Attention C/S Rep: ****************************************************************************** * * * APN : 632-400-071 Phone : * * Ownerl: AUEN TRUST OwnShp: * * Owner2: Pg-Grd: * * Site : 52 SUTTON PL E Census: * * : PALM DESERT CA 92211 Zoning: CPS * * Mail : 52 SUTTON PL E Tract : 24539-00 * * : PALM DESERT CA 92211 Lot/B1: L-0026/ * * Legal : .20 ACRES M/L IN POR LOTS 25 & 26 MB 222/076 TR 24 * * FloodP: * * * * * * Property Characteristics * * * * * * Use : SINGLE RESIDENCE * * Yr Blt: SqFeet: GarSqF: * * BedBth: Addtnl: GarTyp: * * #Story: Roof CarSqF: * * #Units: 1 Ht/C1 : GarTy2: * * Lotsz : 8,712 FirePl: Outlmp: * * Gas Pool StSurf: * * Sewer : View MscBdg: * * Electr: * * Water : * * * * * * Sale/Loan Information * * * * * * Last Trans W/O $: * * SaleDt: 04/24/98 Doc# : 159908 Buyer : AUEN TRUST * * SaleAm: $220, 000 F $/SqFt: Seller: WILLIAM J DAKE T * * 1st Td: LoanTy: Lender: * * +Addl: PrevDt: 12/30/97 Title : ORANGE COAST TIT * * PrevAm: * * * * * * Assessment/Tax Information * * * * Assd : $201, 960 Tax : $2,347.02 * * Land : $61,215 Status: CUR * * Improv: $140,745 TRA : 018060 * * perc: 690 Exempt: * * TaxYr : 98-99 * * * ****************************************************************************** THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS SOURCED FROM PUBLIC DOCUMENTS AND IS NOT GUARANTEED Copyright (C) 1998 Acxiom Corporation Prope Profile - Riverside LANDAMERICA Prepared For: Acnt Rep: Attention : C/S Rep: ****************************************************************************** * * * APN : 632-421-001 Phone : * * Ownerl: MACLEAN,MACTAGGART J OwnShp: MRRD MAN S * * Owner2: Pg-Grd: /819-A5 * * Site : 41945 CARLOTTA DR Census: 0449.033 * * : PALM DESERT CA 92211 Zoning: CPS * * Mail : 41945 CARLOTTA DR Tract : 25436-00 * * : PALM DESERT CA 92211 Lot/Bl: L-0001/ * * Legal : .17 ACRES IN LOT 1 MB 231/067 TR 25436 * * FloodP: 060245 2255 * * * * * * Property Characteristics * * * * * * Use : SINGLE RESIDENCE * * Yr Blt: SqFeet: GarSqF: * * BedBth: Addtnl: GarTyp: * * #Story: Roof CarSqF: * * #Units: 1 Ht/C1 : GarTy2: * * Lotsz : 7,405 FirePl: Outlmp: * * Gas Pool StSurf: * * Sewer : View MscBdg: * * Electr: * * Water : * * * * * * Sale/Loan Information * * * * * * Last Trans W/O $: * * SaleDt: 07/07/97 Doc# : 238413 Buyer : MACLEAN,MACTAGGA * * SaleAm: $195, 000 F $/SqFt: Seller: HAMILTON,AARON D * * 1st Td: $175,305 LoanTy: /VAR/ Lender: AMER SAV BK * * +Addl: PrevDt: 02/09/96 + Title : FIDELITY NATIONA * * PrevAm: $205,000 F * * * * * * Assessment/Tax Information * * * * Assd : $195, 000 Tax : $2,527.20 * * Land : $40, 014 Status: CUR * * Improv: $154, 986 TRA : 018178 * * perc: 799s Exempt: * * TaxYr : 98-99 * * * ****************************************************************************** THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS SOURCED FROM PUBLIC DOCUMENTS AND IS NOT GUARANTEED Copyright (C) 1998 Acxiom Corporation 4 , • Prope _ Profile - Riverside LANDAMERICA Prepared For: Acnt Rep: Attention C/S Rep: ****************************************************************************** * * * APN : 632-421-002 Phone : * * Ownerl: MORELAND,KAREN L OwnShp: * * Owner2: Pg-Grd: /819-A5 * * Site : 41955 CARLOTTA DR Census: 0449.033 * * : PALM DESERT CA 92211 Zoning: CPS * * Mail : 41955 CARLOTTA DR Tract : 25436-00 * * : PALM DESERT CA 92211 Lot/B1: L-0002/ * * Legal : .17 ACRES IN LOT 2 MB 231/067 TR 25436 * * FloodP: 060245 2255 * * * * * * Property Characteristics * * * * * * Use : SINGLE RESIDENCE * * Yr Blt: SqFeet: GarSqF: * * BedBth: Addtnl: GarTyp: * * #Story: Roof CarSqF: * * #Units: 1 Ht/C1 : GarTy2: * * Lotsz : 7,405 FirePl: OutImp: * * Gas Pool StSurf: * * Sewer : View MscBdg: * * Electr: * * Water : * * * * * * Sale/Loan Information * * * * * * Last Trans W/O $: 12/02/97 442044 * * SaleDt: 10/31/97 Doc# : 397217 Buyer : MORELAND,KAREN L * * SaleAm: $195,000 F $/SqFt: Seller: HAMILTON,AARON D * * 1st Td: LoanTy: Lender: * * +Addl: PrevDt: 02/09/96 + Title : FIDELITY NATIONA * * PrevAm: $205,000 F * * * * * * Assessment/Tax Information * * * * Assd : $195, 000 Tax : $2,448.50 * * Land : $40, 014 Status: CUR * * Improv: $154, 986 TRA : 018178 * * perc: 79% Exempt: Y * * TaxYr : 98-99 * * * ****************************************************************************** THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS SOURCED FROM PUBLIC DOCUMENTS AND IS NOT GUARANTEED Copyright (C) 1998 Acxiom Corporation ' Prope Profile - Riverside LANDAMERICA Prepared For: Acnt Rep: Attention C/S Rep: ****************************************************************************** * * * APN : 632-422-008 Phone : * * Ownerl: LISTERMANN,BRAD OwnShp: * * Owner2: Pg-Grd: /819-A5 * * Site : 75595 DEMPSEY DR Census: 0449.033 * * : PALM DESERT CA 92211 Zoning: CPS * * Mail : 75595 DEMPSEY DR Tract : 25436-00 * * : PALM DESERT CA 92211 Lot/B1: L-0032/ * * Legal : .17 ACRES IN LOT 32 MB 231/067 TR 25436 * * FloodP: 060629 0004 * * * * * * Property Characteristics * * * * * * Use : SINGLE RESIDENCE * * Yr Blt: 1992 SqFeet: 2,562 GarSqF: 621 * * BedBth: 4/2.7 Addtnl: GarTyp: ATTACHED * * #Story: 1 Roof : TILE CarSqF: * * #Units: 1 Ht/C1 : B GarTy2: * * Lotsz : 7,405 FirePl: Y OutImp: * * Gas : DEVELOPED Pool : Y StSurf: YES * * Sewer : DEVELOPED View MscBdg: * * Electr: UNDERGRND * * Water : DEVELOPED * * * * * * Sale/Loan Information * * * * * * Last Trans W/O $: * * SaleDt: 06/09/99 Doc# : 255235 Buyer : LISTERMANN,BRAD * * SaleAm: $255, 000 F $/SqFt: $99.53 Seller: MEPHAM,ESTHER A * * 1st Td: $216,750 LoanTy: /VAR/ Lender: FREMONT INV & LN * * +Addl: PrevDt: 03/06/97 Title : FIRST AMERICAN * * PrevAm: $ Q * * * * * * Assessment/Tax Information * * * * Assd : $218,280 Tax : $2,744.12 * * Land : $61,206 Status: CUR * * Improv: $157,074 TRA : 018178 * * perc: 71; Exempt: * * TaxYr : 98-99 * * * ****************************************************************************** THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS SOURCED FROM PUBLIC DOCUMENTS AND IS NOT GUARANTEED Copyright (C) 1998 Acxiom Corporation At vol?3mwQNK'I 30 Aq papTnozd arm put szazawrard anocP au; bu!sn passaoo.zd s2r zaodai 5uTmoTto3 auy paazvazrn6 ;ou sT pue szuawnoop otjgnd wo.z3 paoingp sT uoT:Quuo;uT sTUZ }„ i 666T 90: ZE: 60 LT daS Tz3 puno; aiam saTgzadozd buTtp 1Ew Lb a } } } } } } t i } 1 } } 4 4 4 66/6 0.1. 96/6 alBQ airs = i EVZE9"6EZE9 zagwnH Tao.zed } --- 2TzazTap uoaras --- } } Lfii o1 T sp.zooa2 : auTH 9 - swz23 . 'as Q-1*'41 J� 059I-OZE (09L) '9ZZ6 'VD 'SDNI2idS W'IVd :Aq pa.radaad OOZ#xtfM NOXN'dD zLInOHK.L LLL :day :un000v YJIHSWKQ&v i :Aq papTnc.za :ao3 paarda za iff+Fiai}}uit}}+JFii}}gFiisi**********ff}}i4s}}i4 2pTsaaAT21 s zzodey smazsJS ›foTnnsz2Q/woTxa } Y7}}il#}4.I ********}SIG}it}4444*f+i*i Xi}}4A}}}}ii rage 2 -------------------- 9 ) Prc1:632-400-005 Site:10 BELMONTE DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:REYNOLDS,DAVID D & CA Mail:10 BELMONTE DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Zn:CPS Xmpt:Y Sale:$230, 000F Date: 04/04/97 Doc:113448 Yb:1992 Sgft:2,292 Asd:$234,600 Imp:78t Un:1 Ph: Rms: Beds:3 Bchs:2.5 Lotsz:9, 147 Tract:24539-00 Lt:L-0005 Lender: SELLER First Loan: $169, 900 Loan/Rate Type: /FIX 10 ) Prc1:632-400-009 Site:18 BELMONTE DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:HUTCHINSON TRUST Mai1:18 BELMONTE DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Zn:CPS Xmpt: Sale:$271,500F Date: 07/30/99 Doc:341800 Yb:1992 Sqft:2,292 Asd:$239,700 Imp:74V Un:1 Ph: Rms: Beds:3 Bths:2.5 Locsz:9, 147 Tract:24539-00 Lt:L-0009 Lender: First Loan: Loan/Rate Type: 11 ) Prc1:632-400-012 Site:24 BELMONTE DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:CHISHOLM,BRUCE D & JU Mail:24 BELMONTE DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Zn:CPS Xmpt: Sale:$255, 000F Date: 02/26/99 Doc:77228 Yb:1995 Sgft:2,240 Asd:$216,403 Imp:80% Un:1 Ph: Rms: Beds:4 Bths:2.0 Locsz:9,147 Tract:24539-00 Lt:L-0012 Lender: STANDARD FED BK Firs: Loan: $251, 750 Loan/Rate Type: /FIX 12 ) Prc1:632-400-023 Site:46 SUTTON PL E*PALM DESERT CA 92211 • Ownr:ZEIGLER,GARTH P & LIB Mail:46 SUTTON PL E*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Zn:CPS Xmpt: Sale:$280,000F Date: 02/26/99 Doc:76198 Yb:1995 Sqft:2,240 Asd:$239,292 Imp:78% Un:1 Ph: Rms: Beds:4 Bths:2.0 Lotsz:9, 147 Tract:24539-00 Lt:L-0023 Lender: MERRILL LYNCH CR First Loan: $224, 000 Loan/Rate Type: /VAR 13 ) Prc1:632-400-034 Site:15 BELMONTE DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:HINTON,GREGORY T & SU Mail:15 BELMONTE DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Zn:CPS Xmpt: Sale:$257,500F Date: 06/24/99 Doc:282391 Yb:1992 Sqft:2,132 Asd:$182, 000 Imp:72% Un:1 Ph: Rms: Beds:3 Bths:2.5 Lotsz:9, 147 Tract:24539-00 Lt:L-0036 Lender: FRANKLIN LOAN First Loan: $206, 000 Loan/Rate Type: /VAR 14 ) Prc1:632-400-036 Site:*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:PARKS,DAVID G & PAMEL Mail :11 BELMONTE DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Zn:CPS Xmpt: Sale:$289,000F Date: 11/27/96 Doc:451751 Yb: Sqft: Asd:$294,372 Imp:79% Un:1 Ph: Rms: Beds: Bths: Lotsz:11,761 Tracc:24539-00 Lt:L-0038 Lender: NORWEST MORTGAGE First Loan: $230,850 Loan/Rate Type: /FIX 15 ) Prc1:632-400-049 a Site:53 SUTTON PL E*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:MOSCROP,MARK J & WED Mai1:53 SUTTON PL E*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Zn:CPS Xmpt: Sale:$289, 000F Date: 12/18/96 Doc:476388 Yb: Sqft: Asd:$294,678 Imp:72% Un:1 Ph: (760) 341-6684 Rms: Beds: BChs: Lotsz:9,583 Tract:24539-00 Lt:L-0058 Lender: WORLD SAV BK First Loan: $231,100 Loan/Rate Type: /VAR 16 ) Prc1:632-400-050 Site:51 SUTTON PL E*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:NORTHFELT,DONALD W & Mail:51 SUTTON PL E*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Zn:CPS Xmpt:Y Sale:$309, 000F Date: 10/30/96 Doc:416413 Yb: Sqft: Asd:$314, 9766 Imp:70t Un:1 Ph: Rms: Beds: Bths: Lotsz:9,147 Tract:24539-00 LC:L-0059 Lender: BANK OF AMERICA First Loan: $293,300 Loan/Rate Type: /VAR THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS SOURCED FROM PUBLIC DOCUMENTS AND IS NOT GUARANTEED Copyright (C) 1998 Acxiom Corporation Page 3 17 ) Prc1:632-400-055 Site:7 BELMONTE DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:HOFFMAN,NEAL & MICHEL Mail :7 BELMONTE DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Zn:CPS Xmpt: Sale:$289,000F Date: 06/12/98 Doc:241939 Yb:1995 Sgft:2,240 Asd:$248,239 Imp:79% Un:1 Ph: Rms: Beds:4 Bths:2.0 Lctsz:8,712 Tract:24539-00 Lt:L-0087 Lender: COUNTRYWDE HM LN First Loan: $227, 150 Loan/Rate Type: /FIX 18 ) Prc1:632-400-065 Site:25 BELMONTE DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:WEISLER,ARNOLD L & GA Mail:25 BELMONTE DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Zn:CPS Xmpt: Sale:$365,772F Date: 08/26/93 Doc:357483 Yb:1995 Sgft:2,648 Asd:$301,716 Imp:82k Un:1 Ph: Rms: Beds:4 Bths:2.5 Locsz:9, 147 Tract:24539-00 Lt;L-0031 Lender: DOWNEY S&L First Loan: $285,300 Loan/Rate Type: /FIX 19 ) Prc1:632-400-067 Site:47 SUTTON PL E*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:BENNETT,BARBA.RA D ETA Mail:47 SUTTON PL E*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Zn:CPS Xmpt; Sale:$180,000F Date: 12/24/96 Doc:482851 Yb: Sqft: Asd:$193,600 Imp:72i Un:1 Ph: (760) 568-6857 Rms: Beds: Bchs: Lotsz:9,593 Tract:24539-00 Lt:L-0061 Lender: First Loan: Loan/Race Type: 20 ) Prc1:632-400-069 Site:48 SUTTON PL ETPALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:SORENSEN,HENRY Mail:1623 TEMPLE AVE*LONG BEACH CA 90804 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Zn:CPS Xmnt: Sale:$175,000 Date: 11/01/96 Doc:440312 Yb: Sqft: Asd:$178,500 Imp:71W Un:1 Ph; (562)494-4122 Rms: Beds: Bths: Lotsz:8,712 Tract:24539-00 Lt:L-0024 Lender: First Loan: Loan/Rate Type: 21 ) Prc1:632-400-071 Site:52 SUTTON PL E*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:AUEN TRUST Mail:52 SUTTON PL E*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Zn:CPS Xmpt: Sale;$220,000F Date: 04/24/98 Doc:159908 Yb: Sqft: Asd:$201, 960 Imp:69% Un:1 Ph: Rms; Beds: Bths: Lotsz:8,712 Tract:24539-00 Lt:L-0026 Lender: First Loan: Loan/Rate Type: 22 ) Prc1:632-400-072 Site:54 SUTTON PL E*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:DELEO,SHARON I Mail:54 SUTTON PL E*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Zn: Xmpt: Sa1e:$287,000 Date: 10/31/96 Doc:417212 Yb: Sgfc: Asd:$292,740 Imp:72k Un:1 Ph: Rms: Beds: Bths: Lotsz:9,147 Tract:24539-00 Lt:L-0027 Lender: First Loan: Loan/Rate Type: 23 ) Prc1:632-400-078 o Site:89 HUDSON CT*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:DUNCAN,CAROL C ` Mail:89 HUDSON CT*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Zn:CPS Xmpt: Sale:$350, 000F Date: 09/25/98 Doc:411959 Yb: Sqft: Asd:$294, 953 Imp:68% Un:1 Ph: Rms: Beds: Bths: Locsz:9,583 Tract:24539-00 Lt:L-0050 Lender: KEY BANK NA First Loan: $333, 100 Loan/Race Type: /VAR 24 ) Prc1:632-400-080 Site: Ownr:ESHE,GEORGE A & LUCIL Mai1:3 BELMONTE DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Zn:CPS Xmpt: Sale:$263, 000F Dace: 03/13/98 Doc:93436 Yb: Sqft: Asd:$247,350 Imp:79% Un:1 Ph: Rms: Beds: Bths: Lotsz:9,147 Tract:24539-00 Lt:L-0099 Lender: HOME SAV AMERICA First Loan: $170, 950 Loan/Rate Type: /VAR THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS SOURCED FROM PUBLIC DOCUMENTS AND IS NOT GUARANTEED Copyright (C) 1998 Acxiom Corporation 3 il Page 4 25 ) Prc1:632-410-001 Site:56 SUTTON PL E*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:ZIESMANN,KARL E. KATHE Mail:56 SUTTON PL E*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Zn:CPS Xmpt: Sale:$130, 000F Date: 10/31/96 Doc:417210 Yb: Sqft: Asd:$265,200 Imp:69k Un:1 Ph: (760) 568-5392 Rms: Beds: Bths: Lotsz:8,712 Tract:24539-00 Lt:L-0028 Lender: NORWEST MORTGAGE First Loan: $120, 000 Loan/Rate Type: /FIX 26 ) Prc1:632-410-013 Site:66 SUTTON PL E*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:HILLIARD,A K Mail:6511 SENECA RD*SHAWNEE MISSION KS 66208 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Zn:CPS Xmpt: Sale:$239,000F Date: 10/22/96 Doc:403400 Yb:1995 Sgft:2,240 Asd:$243,780 Imp:741 Un:1 Ph: (913) 362-5306 Rms: Beds:4 Bths:2.0 Lotsz:8,712 Tract:24539-00 Lt:L-0066 Lender: FIRSTBANK N A First Loan: $180,000 Loan/Rate Type: /VAR 27 ) Prc1:632-410-019 Sice:78 SUTTON PL StPALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:RODGER PLACE HOLDINGS Mail:78 SUTTON PL S*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Zn:CPS Xntpt: Sale:$235,000F Date: 07/15/98 Doc:291258 Yb:1995 Sqft:2, 002 Asd:$195,595 Imp:79k Un:1 Ph: Rms: Beds:4 Bths:2.0 Lotsz:8,712 Tract:24539-00 Lc:L-0072 Lender: First Loan: Loan/Rate Type: 28 ) Prc1:632-410-036 Site:80 BEEKMAN PL*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:TAFFI,DONALD J & MADE Mail:80 BEEKMAN PL*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Zn:CPS Xmpt: Sale:$363,300F Date: 06/05/98 Doc:231742 Yb:1995 Sgft:2, 648 Asd:$276,500 Imp:70% Un:1 Ph: Rms: Beds:4 Bths:2.5 Lotsz:9,583 Tract:24539-00 Lc:L-0051 Lender: MTG CAPITAL RESO First Loan: $272,250 • Loan/Rate Type: /FIX 29 ) Prc1:632-410-042 Site:55 SUTTON PL E*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:PYLE,STEPHEN S & DELI Mail:55 SUTTON PL E*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Zn: Xmpt:Y Sale:$198,S00F Date: 11/08/96 Doc:430129 Yb: Sqft: Asd:$202, 062 Imp:691 Un:1 Ph: Rms: Beds: Bths: Lotsz:9,712 Tract:24539-00 Lt:L-0057 Lender: FIRST FRANK FIN First Loan: $155, 000 Loan/Rate Type: /FIX 30 ) Prc1:632-410-048 Size:75 SUTTON PL W*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:PROCTOR,LU Mail:75 SUTTON PL W*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Zn:CPS Xmpt:Y Sale:$240,000 Date: 12/01/96 Doc:469167 Yb:1995 Sqft:2,240 Asd:$244,800 Imp:79% Un:1 Ph: Rms: Beds:4 Bths:2.0 Lotsz:10,890 Tract:24539-00 Lt:L-0079 Lender: First Loan: Loan/Rate Type: 31 ) Prc1:632-421-001 I Site:41945 CARLOTTA DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:MACLEAN,MACTAGGART Mail:41945 CARLOTTA DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Zn:CPS Xmpt: Sale:$195,000F Date: 07/07/97 Doc:238413 Yb: Sqft: Asd:$195, 000 Imp:79k Un:1 Ph: Rms: Beds: Bths: Lotsz:7,405 Tract:2543E-00 Lc:L-0001 Lender: AMER SAV BK First Loan: $175,305 Loan/Rate Type: /VAR 32 ) Prc1:632-421-002 Site:41955 CARLOTTA DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:MORELAND,KAREN L Mail:41955 CARLOTTA DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Zn:CPS Xmpt:Y Sale:$195,000F Date: 10/31/97 Doc:397217 Yb: Sqft: Asd:$195, 000 Imp:791 Un:1 Ph: Rms: Beds: Bths: Lotsz:7,405 Tracc:25436-00 Lt:L-0002 Lender; First Loan: Loan/Rate Type: THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS SOURCED FROM PUBLIC DOCUMENTS AND IS NOT GUARANTEED Copyright (C) 1998 Acxiom Corporation Page 5 33 ) Prc1:632-421-004 Site:41950 FREEDOM CT*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:FLEMING,DANIEL W & JE Mail :41960 FREEDOM CT*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Zn:CPS Xmpt: Sale;5218,000F Date: 02/22/99 Doc:68254 Yb:1993 Sgft:2,247 Asd:$177, 908 Imp:76% Un•1 Ph: Rms: Beds:3 Bths:2.0 Lotsz:7,840 Tract:25436-00 Lt:L-0004 Lender: COUNTRYWDE HM LN First Loan: $174,400 Loan/Rate Type: /FIX 34 ) Prc1:632-421-005 Site:41950 FREEDOM CT*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:SCHULZE,KRIS R & CHER Mail:41950 FREEDOM CT*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Zn:CPS Xmpt:Y Sale:$183,000F Date: 12/31/97 Doc:479718 Yb: Sqft: Asd:$183, 000 Imp:78% Un:1 Ph: Rms: Beds: Bths: Lotsz:7,405 Tract:25436-00 Lt:L-0005 Lender: MTG CAPITAL RESO First Loan: $173,850 Loan/Rate Type: /FIX 35 l Prc1:632-421-007 Site:41945 FREEDOM CT*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:ANDERSEN,LEIF & ANNET Mai1:41945 FREEDOM CT*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Zn:CPS Xmpt: Sale:$220,000F Date: 10/30/98 Doc:470088 Yb:1993 Sqft:2,562 Asd:$210,000 Imp:76% Un:1 Ph: Rms: Beds:4 Bths:2.7 Lotsz:7,840 Tract:25436-00 Lc:L-0007 Lender: NEW CENTURY MTG First Loan: $196, 900 Loan/Rate Type: /VAR 36 ) Prc1:632-421-008 Site:41955 FREEDOM CT*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:NEDER,AMANDA Mail:41955 FREEDOM CT*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Zn:CPS Xmpt: Sale:$208,000F Date: 09/13/96 Doc:347626 Yb: Sqft: Asd:$212,160 Imp:80% Un:1 Ph: Rms: Beds: Bths: Lotsz:7,405 Tract:25436-00 Lt:L-0008 Lender: First Loan: Loan/Rate Type: 37 ) Pre1:632-421-009 Site:41965 FREEDOM CT*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:MOSS,SCOTT J ETAL Mail:41965 FREEDOM CT*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Zn:CPS Xmpt: Sale:$210,000F Date: 03/12/97 Doc:82999 Yb: Sqft: Asd:$214,200 Imp:71% Un:1 Ph; (760) 779-9959 Rms: Beds: Bths: Lotsz:7, 840 Tract:25436-00 Lt:L-0009 Lender: BANK OF AMERICA First Loan: $199,500 Loan/Rate Type: /FIX 38 ) Prc1:632-421-015 Site:41955 MAYRN CT*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:CALDWELL,DAVID E Mail:41965 MAYRN CT*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Zn:CPS Xmpt: Sale:$225, 000F Date: 03/27/99 Doc:114467 Yb:1992 Sgft:3,280 Asd:$260,100 Imp:80% Un:1 Ph: Rms: Beds:4 BChs:3.0 Lotsz:7,840 Tract:25436-00 Lt:L-0015 Lender: FIRST PAC FIN First Loan: $180, 000 Loan/Rate Type: /FIX 39 ) Prc1:632-421-017 1 Site:41950 HEMINGWAY CT*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:CARTWRIGHT,WILL_IAM M Mail:41950 HEMINGWAY CT-PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Zn:CPS Xmpt: Sale:$274,000 Date: 09/04/98 Doc:379238 Yb:1992 Sgft:3, 100 Asd:$187,258 Imp:68% Un:1 Ph: Rms: Beds:4 Bths:3 .0 Lotsz:7,840 Tract:25436-00 Lt;L-0017 Lender: MERRILL LYNCH CR First Loan: $274, 000 Loan/Rate Type: /VAR 40 ) Prc1:632-421-019 Site:41945 HEMINGWAY CT*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:THOMAS,ROBERT F Mail:1740 E GARRY AVE 101*SANTA ANA CA 92705 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Zn:CPS Xmpt: Sale:$239, 000 Date: 04/20/98 Doc:150969 Yb:1992 Sgfc:2,562 Asd:$240,000 Imp:70% Un•1 Ph: Rms: Beds:4 Bths:2.7 Lotsz:7,405 Tract:25435-00 Lt:L-0019 Lender: First Loan: Loan/Rate Type: THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS SOURCED FROM PUBLIC DOCUMENTS AND IS NOT GUARANTEED Copyright (C) 1998 Acxiom Corporation Page 6 41 ) Prc1:632-421-023 Site:41985 HEMINGWAY CT+PALM DESERT CA 92211 Owrr:GERHARDT,MATHEW & SHE Mail:41985 HEMINGWAY CT*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Zn:CPS Xmpc: Sale:$210,000 Date: 07/01/97 Doc:233016 Yb:1992 Sqft:3, 100 Asd:$210, 000 Imp:76V Un:1 Ph: Rms: Beds:4 Bths:3.0 Locsz:7, 840 Tract:25436-00 Lt:L-0023 Lender: MORTGAGE CENTER First Loan: $190,800 Loan/Rate Type: /FIX 42 ) Prc1:632-421-024 Site:41995 HEMINGWAY CT*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:MILLHAUSER,JOHN & VEL Mail:41995 HEMINGWAY CT*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Zn:CPS Xmpt: Sale:$179, 00oF Date: 06/26/98 Doc:262789 Yb:1992 Sgft:2,247 Asd:$210,000 Imp:71% Un:1 Ph: Rms: Beds:3 Bths:2.0 Locsz:8,276 Tract:25436-00 Lt:L-0024 Lender: COUNTRYWDE HM LN First Loan: $143,200 Loan/Rate Type: /FIX 43 ) Prc1:632-422-001 Site:75525 DEMPSEY DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:NAKASHIMA,RUTH ETAL Mail:75525 DEMPSEY DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Zn:CPS Xmpc; Sale:$174,000 Date: 10/04/96 Doc:383293 Yb:1992 Sgft:2,247 Asd•$177,480 Imp:77V Un:1 Ph: (760)568-3216 Rms: Beds:3 Bchs:2.0 Lotsz:7,840 Tract:25436-00 Lt:L-0025 Lender: AMER SAV BK First Loan: $130,500 Loan/Rate Type: /VAR 44 ) Prc1:632-422-008 Site:75595 DEMPSEY DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:LISTERMANN,BRAD Mail:75595 DEMPSEY DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Zn:CPS Xmpt: Sale:$255, 000F Date: 06/09/99 Doc:255235 Yb:1992 Sqft:2, 562 Asd:$218,280 Imp:71% Un:1 Ph: Rms: Beds:4 Bths:2.7 Locsz:7,405 Tract:25436-00 Lt:L-0032 Lender: FREMONT INV & LN First Loan: $216,750 Loan/Rate Type: /VAR 45 ) Prc1:632-422-009 Site:75605 DEMPSEY DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:LANDER,ELLIOT B & MAR Mail:75605 DEMPSEY DR=PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Zn:CPS Xmpc: Sale:$229, 000F Date: 04/02/98 Doc:126934 Yb:1992 Sgft:3,100 Asd:$275, 000 Imp:74% Un:1 Ph: Rms: Beds:4 Bths:3 .0 Lotsz:7,405 Tract:25436-00 Lt:L-0033 Lender: HEADLANDS MTG First Loan: $218,400 Loan/Rate Type: /FIX 46 ) Prc1:632-422-010 Site:75615 DEMPSEY DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:MILLOT,VALERIE & ERIC Mail:75615 DEMPSEY DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Zn:CPS Xmpt: Sale:$187, 000F Date: 12/24/98 Doc:558920 Yb:1993 Sgft:2,247 A3d:$198, 196 Imp:79a Un:1 Ph: Rms: Beds:3 Bths:2.0 Lotsz:7,405 Tract:25436-00 Lt:L-0034 Lender: WASHINGTON FSB First Loan: 8140,250 Loan/Rate Type: /VAR 47 ) Prc1:632-422-011 o Site:75625 DEMPSEY DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr: ' ,CASTELLANOS TRUST Mail:PO BOX 14030*PALM DESERT CA 92255 Use:VAC RESIDENTIAL Zn:CPS Xmpt : Sale:$50, 000F Date: 07/30/99 Doc:341207 Yb: Sqft: Asd:$35,373 Im •0t Un: Ph: Rms: Beds: Bths: Lotsz:7,405 Tract:25436-00 LE:L-0035 Lender: First Loan: Loan/Rate Type: THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS SOURCED FROM PUBLIC DOCUMENTS AND IS NOT GUARANTEED Copyright (C) 1998 Acxiom Corporation ********* ,****************t * Acxiom/DataQuick Systems Report t * Riverside **t******************************************* Prepared for: Provided by: LANDAMERICA Account Rep: 777 TAHQUITZ CANYON WAY#200 Prepared by; PALM SPRINGS, CA. 92264 (760) 320-1650 ***t*t*w****t********7* eye***y*******_******w*****.******T_ W****a**,1* * Farms - 6 line : records I to 12 t * --- Search Criteria --- * Parcel Number 63236 * Sale Date 9/96 TO 9/99 * * * t * w t * * * t * W w t t 12 matching properties were found w t**W**t****Ww********* Fri Sep 17 OB:31:25 1999 ** This information is sourced from public documents and is not guaranteed ** The following report was processed using the above parameters and was provided by of LANDAMERICA • 1 ) Prc1:632-361-004 ,:75707 EASY ST*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:SULLIVAN,WILLIAM A & Mail:7507 EASY STZPALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Zn:CPS Xmpt: Sale:$195, 000 Date: 02/11/99 Doc:55474 Yb:1989 Sgft:2, 119 Asd:$205,000 Imp:68% Un:1 Ph: Rms: Beds:3 Bths:2.7 Lotsz:6,534 Tract:21338-01 Lt:L-0004 Lender: COUNTRYWDE HM LN First Loan: $185,250 Loan/Rate Type: /FIX 2 ) Prc1:632-361-006 Site:75748 EASY ST*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:JACOESON,WARREN & ZOE Mail:75748 EASY ST*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Zn:CPS Xmpt:Y Sale:$155, 000F Dace: 04/30/97 Doc:147051 Yb:1989 Sgft:1,851 Asd:$158,100 Imp:74t Un:1 Ph: Rms: Beds:3 Eths:1.7 Lotsz:6,098 Tract:21338-01 Lt:L-0006 Lender: NORWEST MORTGAGE First Loan: $139,275 Loan/Rate Type: /FIX 3 ) Prc1:632-361-007 Site:75742 EASY ST*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:DRAVIS,NORMAN & CATHE Mail:75742 EASY ST*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Zn:CPS Xmpt:Y Sale:$160,000F Date: 08/26/97 Doc:309870 Yb:1989 Sqft:1,418 Asd:$160,000 Imp:75% Un:1 Ph: Rms: Beds:3 Bths:1.7 Lotsz:6,534 Tract:21338-01 Lt:L-0007 Lender: First Loan: Loan/Rate Type: 4 ) Prc1:632-361-009 Site:75728 EASY ST*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:BERRYHILL,STEVEN M & Mail:75728 EASY ST*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Zn:CPS Xmpt: Sale:$185,000 Date: 07/02/98 Doc:274229 Yb:1989 Sgft:2,119 Asd:$230,986 Imp:72% Un:1 Ph: (760) 773-0367 Rms: Beds:3 Bths:2.7 Lotsz:7, 405 Tract:21338-01 Lt:L-0009 Lender: MISSION HILLS MG First Loan: $175,750 Loan/Rate Type: /FIX 5 ) Prc1:632-361-011 Site:75712 EASY ST*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:NEWBY,RICAHRD W & VIC Mail:75712 EASY ST*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Zn:CPS Xmpt: Sale:$147, 000F Date: 05/01/98 Doc:172565 Yb:1989 Sqft:1,418 Asd:$93,956 Imp:74-a Un:1 Ph: Rms: Beds:3 Bths:1.7 Lotsz:7,405 Tract:21338-01 Lt:L-0011 Lender: COUNTRYWDE HM LN First Loan: $144,590 Loan/Rate Type: FHA/FIX 6 ) Prc1:632-361-012 Site:75706 EASY ST*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:BAKAL,RON & MARY Mail:75706 EASY ST*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Zn:CPS Xmpt:Y Sale:$15, 000P Date: 03/12/97 Doc:82947 Yb:1989 Sgft:2,119 Asd:$239,700 Imp:72% Un:1 Ph: Rms: Beds:3 Bths:2.7 Lotsz:9, 583 Tract:21338-01 Lt:L-0012 Lender: First Loan: Loan/Rate Type: 7 ) Prc1:632-361-016 Site:75685 DOLMAR CT*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:MCILROY,STEVE A & JEA Mai1:75685 DOLMAR CT*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Zn:tPS Xmpt: Sale:$228,000F Date: 04/01/99 Doc:137814 Yb:1990 Sgft:2,119 Asd:$203,938 Imnp:74% Un:1 Ph: Rms: Beds:3 Bths:2.7 Lotsz:7,840 Tract:21338-01 Lt:L-0016 Lender: NORWEST MORTGAGE First Loan: $216,600 Loan/Rate Type: /FIX 8 ) Prc1:632-361-017 Site:75699 DOLMAR CT1rPALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:GROMAN,WILLIAM M & LI Mail:600 DOVER LN*CAMBRIA CA 93428 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Zn:CPS Xmpt: Sale:$225,000F Date: 04/30/99 Doc:184350 Yb:1990 Sgft:2,119 Asd:$256,417 Imp:75% Un:1 Ph: Rms: Beds:3 Bths:2.7 Lotsz:7,840 Tract:21338-01 Lt:L-0017 Lender: FRANKLIN LOAN First Loan: $180, 000 Loan/Rate Type: /FIX THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS SOURCED FROM PUBLIC DOCUMENTS AND IS NOT GUARANTEED Copyright (C) 1998 Acxiom Corporation 3 ) Prc1:632-361-022 ;:75730 DOLMAR CT*PALM DESERT L__ 92211 Ownr:WEBB,TRACY & KIMBERLY Mail:75730 DOLMAR CTWPA.LM DESERT CA 92211 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Zn:CPS Xmpt:Y Sale;$163, 000F Date: 03/12/97 Doc:81910 Yb:1990 Sgft:2,119 Asd:$166,260 Im 75% Un:1 Ph: (760) 340-1823 Rms: Beds:3 Bths:2.7 Lotsz:6, 969 Tract:21338-01 Lt:L-0022 Lender: AMER SAV BK First Loan: $125,000 Loan/Rate Type: /FIX 10 ) Prc1:632-361-031 Site:75746 DUVAL CT*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:WALKER TRUST Mail:45120 SAN PABLO AVE=PALM DESERT CA 92260 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Zn:CPS Xmpt: Sale:$182,500F Date: 11/12/98 Doc:490905 Yb:1990 Sqft:1, 851 Asd:$160,221 Imp:74% Un:1 Ph: (909) 337-9242 Rms: Beds:3 Bths:1.7 Lotsz:9,583 Tract:21338-01 Lt:L-0031 Lender: FIRST NATL BANK First Loan: $100,000 Loan/Rate Type: /FIX 11 ) Prc1:632-361-036 Site:41550 CARLOTTA DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:BUCKLIN,GERALD S & TA Mail:41550 CARLOTTA DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Zn:CPS Xmpt:Y Sale:$190,545F Date: 05/29/97 Doc:188522 Yb:1990 Sgft:2, 119 Asd:$194,412 Imp:73% Un:1 Ph: Rms: Beds:3 Eths:2.7 Lotsz:9,147 Tract:21338-01 Lt:L-0036 Lender: BANK OF AMERICA First Loan: $181, 000 Loan/Rate Type: /FIX 12 ) Prc1:632-361-038 Site:75733 SANDCASTLE LN*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:ELBAUM,MATT & PAMELA Mail:75733 SANDCASTLE LN*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Zn:CPS Xmpt: Sa1e:$195, 000F Date: 06/30/98 Doc:269031 Yb:1989 Sqft:2, 119 Asd:$223,254 Imp:74* Un:1 Ph: Rms: Beds:3 Bths:2.7 Lotsz:7,405 Tract:21338-01 Lt:L-0038 Lender: FRANKLIN LOAN First Loan: $156, 000 Loan/Rate Type: /FIX a THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS SOURCED FROM PUBLIC DOCUMENTS AND IS NOT GUARANTEED Copyright (C) 1998 Acxiom Corporation ********************************************** * Acxiom/DataQuick Systems Report * * * Riverside ********************************************** Prepared for: Provided by: LANDAMERICA Account Rep: 777 TAHQUITZ CANYON WAY#200 Prepared by: PALM SPRINGS, CA. 92264 (760) 320-1650 ****************************************************************************** * Farms - 5 line : records 1 to 94 * * --- Search Criteria --- * New Map Pg-Grid 819-A4 * Sale Date 9/96 TO 9/99 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 94 matching properties were found Thu Sep 16 12 :28:11 1999 ***********************k****************************************************** ** This information is sourced from public documents and is not guaranteed ** The following report was processed using the above parameters and was provided by of LANDAMERICA Page 1 1 ) Prc1:632-030-007 Site:41505 CARLOTTA DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:FOUNTAINS SENIOR PROP Mail:124 E 4TH ST*TULSA OK 74103 Use:AUTO REPAIR SHO Ph: Zn:Rl Sale:$13,309F Date:11/04/98 Loans: Xmpt: Yb: Sqft: Asd:$16,209,58 Imp:96% Un: Doc#:479881 Tr: 00000-00 Lot: P-0003 Bdrms: Bths: Lotsz: 19.40 A 2 ) Prc1:632-041-058 Site:41065 LARGO*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:MAGALDI,JOHN J Mail:41065 LARGO*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn:PR Sale:$85, 000 Date:06/01/97 Loans: Xmpt:Y Yb:1980 Sqft:1, 184 Asd:$86,700 Imp:76% Un:1 Doc#:205962 Tr: 13407-01 Lot: L-0101 Bdrms: 3 Bths: 1.7 Lotsz: 2,613 3 ) Prc1:632-291-044 Site:111 LOOKOUT DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:SANDLER,LOWELL B & TR Mail:111 LOOKOUT DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn:PR Sale:$328,000F Date:07/25/97 Loans:$128,000 Xmpt:Y Yb:1984 Sqft:2,764 Asd:$328, 000 Imp:69% Un:1 Doc#:263956 Tr: 15633-00 Lot: U-0804 Bdrms: 3 Bths: 3 .2 Lotsz: 4,356 4 ) Prc1:632-291-048 Site:103 LOOKOUT DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:STUBBS,JAMES R & DIAN Mail:5621 KIMBALL AVE*CHINO CA 91710 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn:PR Sale:$215, 000F Date:02/19/99 Loans:$161,250 Xmpt: Yb:1983 Sgft:1,368 Asd:$183,600 Imp:77% Un:1 Doc#:66434 Tr: 15633-00 Lot: U-0809 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 1.7 Lotsz: 2,613 5 ) Prc1:632-291-052 Site:95 LOOKOUT DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:LOOKOUT PROP CORP Mail:6550 MARINE CRES*VANCOUVER BC CANADA V6 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn:PR Sale:$215,000F Date:10/31/96 Loans: Xmpt: Yb:1983 Sqft:1,858 Asd:$219,300 Imp:74% Un:1 Doc#:417463 Tr: 15633-00 Lot: U-0813 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 1.7 Lotsz: 3, 049 6 ) Prc1:632-302-051 Site:266 RUNNING SPRINGS DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:HOWITT,RICHARD V & EI Mail:972 CAMINO DEL RIO*SANTA BARBARA CA 93110 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: (805) 681-0717 Zn:PR Sale:$190, 000F Date:08/19/97 Loans: Xmpt: Yb:1983 Sqft:1,368 Asd:$190,000 Imp:73% Un:1 Doc#:297614 Tr: 15633-00 Lot: U-0279 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 1.7 Lotsz: 2,613 7 ) Prc1:632-302-052 Site:268 RUNNING SPRINGS DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:KLECAK,THOMAS R & NAO Mai1:268 RUNNING SPRINGS DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn:PR Sale:$253,636F Date:07/07/99 Loans:$202,500 Xmpt: Yb:1983 Sqft:1,746 Asd:$229,500 Imp:77% Un:1 Doc#:301296 Tr: 15633-00 Lot: U-0280 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 1.7 Lotsz: 2,613 8 ) Prc1:632-303-056 ` Site:190 WAGON WHEEL RD*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:MOWERY,LEE A & MARILY Mail:2221 MARSELINA*TUSTIN CA 92782 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn:PR Sale:$440,000F Date:10/17/97 Loans:$350, 000 Xmpt:Y Yb:1984 Sqft:2,764 Asd:$440, 000 Imp:72% Un:1 Doc#:377693 Tr: 15633-00 Lot: U-0611 Bdrms: 3 Bths: 3 .2 Lotsz: 4,356 9 ) Prc1:632-303-057 Site:192 WAGON WHEEL RD*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:ROBB,LEON G & CAROLE Mail:2270 CANYONBACK RD*LOS ANGELES CA 90049 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: (760) 340-3400 Zn:PR Sale:$375,000F Date:03/18/97 Loans:$150, 000 Xmpt: Yb:1984 Sqft:2,679 Asd:$372,300 Imp:72% Un:1 Doc#:90451 Tr: 15633-00 Lot: U-0612 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 3.0 Lotsz: 4,356 THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS SOURCED FROM PUBLIC DOCUMENTS AND IS NOT GUARANTEED Copyright (C) 1998 Acxiom Corporation Page 2 10 ) Prc1:632-303-080 Site:268 GREEN MOUNTAIN DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:MELCHER,JOHN & BARBAR Mail:60801 BROSTERHOUS RD*BEND OR 97702 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn:PR Sale:$421,000F Date:03/17/98 Loans:$227, 000 Xmpt: Yb:1984 Sqft:2,764 Asd:$129,721 Imp:66% Un:1 Doc#:97270 Tr: 15633-00 Lot: U-0635 Bdrms: 3 Bths: 3 .2 Lotsz: 4,356 11 ) Prc1:632-303-086 Site:280 GREEN MOUNTAIN DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:WISEMAN,L W & FRANCES Mail:1246 W DWYER DR*ANAHEIM CA 92801 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn:PR Sale:$190,000F Date:06/05/97 Loans:$75,000 Xmpt: Yb:1984 Sqft:1,746 Asd:$193,800 Imp:76% Un:1 Doc#:198984 Tr: 15633-00 Lot: U-0641 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 1.7 Lotsz: 2,613 12 ) Prc1:632-304-014 Site:202 GREEN MOUNTAIN DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:MANDEL TRUST Mail:202 GREEN MOUNTAIN DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn:PR Sale:$315,000F Date:06/23/99 Loans: Xmpt: Yb:1984 Sqft:2, 184 Asd:$360,754 Imp:69% Un:1 Doc#:280716 Tr: 15633-00 Lot: U-0594 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 3.0 Lotsz: 3,484 13 ) Prc1:632-304-030 Site:209 WAGON WHEEL RD*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:KROCE,NICHOLAS J & JE Mail:209 WAGON WHEEL RD*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn:PR Sale:$295,000F Date:05/07/99 Loans:$210,000 Xmpt: Yb:1984 Sqft:1,746 Asd:$231,427 Imp:77% Un:1 Doc#:197599 Tr: 15633-00 Lot: U-0610 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 1.7 Lotsz: 2,613 14 ) Prc1:632-304-051 Site:199 GREEN MOUNTAIN DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:KAPLAN,MANNON & SYBIL Mail:12603 SARAH ST*STUDIO CITY CA 91604 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: (760) 340-0897 Zn:PR Sale:$357,500F Date:03/06/98 Loans:$150, 000 Xmpt: Yb:1984 Sqft:2,764 Asd:$347,596 Imp:67% Un:1 Doc#:82012 Tr: 15633-00 Lot: U-0576 Bdrms: 3 Bths: 3.2 Lotsz: 4,356 15 ) Prc1:632-304-052 Site:197 GREEN MOUNTAIN DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:VOGEL TRUST Mail:197 GREEN MOUNTAIN DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn:PR Sale:$350,000F Date:10/27/98 Loans: Xmpt: Yb:1984 Sqft:2,679 Asd:$339,500 Imp:70% Un:1 Doc#:461944 Tr: 15633-00 Lot: U-0577 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 3 .0 Lotsz: 4,356 16 ) Prc1:632-304-053 Site:195 GREEN MOUNTAIN DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:FEDERMAN,JEROLD & BAR Mail:530 LORING AVE*LOS ANGELES CA 90024 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn:PR Sale:$355, 000F Date:07/08/97 Loans:$284,000 Xmpt: Yb:1984 Sqft:2, 184 Asd:$355,000 Imp:77% Un:1 Doc#:239647 Tr: 15633-00 Lot: U-0578 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 3.0 Lotsz: 3,484 17 ) Prc1:632-304-054 O Site:193 GREEN MOUNTAIN DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:JEBEJIAN,GERALD A & S Mail:232 S LINDEN DR*BEVERLY HILLS CA 90212 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: (310) 277-8836 Zn:PR Sale:$130, 000F Date:07/25/97 Loans: Xmpt: Yb:1984 Sqft:2,679 Asd:$324,000 Imp:75% Un:1 Doc#:263205 Tr: 15633-00 Lot: U-0579 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 3 .0 Lotsz: 4,356 18 ) Prc1:632-311-005 Site:280 RUNNING SPRINGS DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:WALTON,HAROLD M Mail:280 RUNNING SPRINGS DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn:PR Sale:$300, 000F Date:10/09/97 Loans:$110, 000 Xmpt:Y Yb:1983 Sqft:2,764 Asd:$300,000 Imp:66% Un:1 Doc#:367592 Tr: 15633-00 Lot: U-0286 Bdrms: 3 Bths: 3 .2 Lotsz: 4,356 THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS SOURCED FROM PUBLIC DOCUMENTS AND IS NOT GUARANTEED Copyright (C) 1998 Acxiom Corporation (.1<476'. eT • Page 3 19 ) Prc1:632-311-008 Site:286 RUNNING SPRINGS DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:NATT,THEODORE M & DIA Mail:19 VIEW RIDGE CIR*LONGVIEW WA 98632 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn:PR Sale:$552,500F Date:12/18/98 Loans: Xmpt: Yb:1983 Sqft:2,764 Asd:$395,000 Imp:74% Un:1 Doc#:549356 Tr: 15633-00 Lot: U-0289 Bdrms: 3 Bths: 3 .2 Lotsz: 4,356 20 ) Prc1:632-311-014 Site:322 RUNNING SPRINGS DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:MAXWELL,NANCY W Mail:322 RUNNING SPRINGS DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn:PR Sale:$212,500F Date:07/29/97 Loans:$85, 000 Xmpt:Y Yb:1984 Sgft:2, 184 Asd:$212,500 Imp:76% Un:1 Doc#:267257 Tr: 15633-00 Lot: U-0297 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 3.0 Lotsz: 3,484 21 ) Prc1:632-311-015 Site:324 RUNNING SPRINGS DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:REESE TRUST Mail:324 RUNNING SPRINGS DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn:PR Sale:$320, 000F Date:04/27/99 Loans: Xmpt: Yb:1984 Sqft:2, 184 Asd:$255, 000 Imp:72% Un:1 Doc#:176402 Tr: 15633-00 Lot: U-0298 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 3 .0 Lotsz: 3,484 22 ) Prc1:632-311-017 Site:330 RUNNING SPRINGS DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:PARKS TRUST Mail:222 MONTEREY RD 1205*GLENDALE CA 91206 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn:PR Sale:$460, 000F Date:08/04/99 Loans: Xmpt: Yb:1984 Sqft:2,764 Asd:$357, 975 Imp:73% Un:1 Doc#:348383 Tr: 15633-00 Lot: U-0301 Bdrms: 3 Bths: 3 .2 Lotsz: 4,356 23 ) Prc1:632-311-026 Site:327 SUNDANCE CIR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:SOLOMON TRUST Mail:2103 RIDGE DR*LOS ANGELES CA 90049 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: (760) 568-3598 Zn:PR Sale:$292, 000F Date:02/26/99 Loans: Xmpt: Yb:1984 Sqft:1, 919 Asd:$255, 000 Imp:74% Un:1 Doc#:76960 Tr: 15633-00 Lot: U-0532 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 3.0 Lotsz: 3,049 24 ) Prc1:632-311-027 Site:325 SUNDANCE CIR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:DENTON TRUST Mail:325 SUNDANCE CIR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn:PR Sale:$330, 000F Date:01/26/99 Loans:$280,000 Xmpt: Yb:1984 Sqft:2,294 Asd:$310,000 Imp:75% Un:1 Doc#:30531 Tr: 15633-00 Lot: U-0533 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 2.5 Lotsz: 3,484 25 ) Prc1:632-311-029 Site:321 SUNDANCE CIR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:ARVIN,THOMAS W & MARY Mail:RR 2 BOX 8*HOMEDALE ID 83628 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn:PR Sale:$235,000F Date:05/07/99 Loans: Xmpt: Yb:1984 Sqft:1,746 Asd:$107, 148 Imp:76% Un:1 Doc#:197586 Tr: 15633-00 Lot: U-0535 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 1.7 Lotsz: 2,613 26 ) Prc1:632-311-031 ° Site:317 SUNDANCE CIR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:DILLON,T E & DONNA L Mail:22176 RIO VISTA DR*CALDWELL ID 83605 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: (208)459-0564 Zn:PR Sale:$215, 000F Date:11/13/98 Loans:$200, 000 Xmpt: Yb:1984 Sqft:2,679 Asd:$336,622 Imp:75% Un:1 Doc#:492922 Tr: 15633-00 Lot: U-0537 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 3.0 Lotsz: 4,356 27 ) Prc1:632-311-033 Site:313 SUNDANCE CIR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:ASPINWALL,DANIEL J & Mail:2025 AUTUMN PL*SAINT PAUL MN 55113 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn:PR Sale:$400, 000F Date:07/07/99 Loans: Xmpt: Yb:1984 Sqft:2,749 Asd:$351,411 Imp:81% Un:1 Doc#:301325 Tr: 15633-00 Lot: U-0539 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 3 .0 Lotsz: 4, 356 THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS SOURCED FROM PUBLIC DOCUMENTS AND IS NOT GUARANTEED Copyright (C) 1998 Acxiom Corporation 0 Page 4 28 ) Prc1:632-311-036 Site:287 GREEN MOUNTAIN DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:HAHN,ALAN C & LINDA Mail:4445 ALTA TUPELO DR*CALABASAS CA 91302 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn:PR Sale:$325, 000F Date:04/16/98 Loans:$260,000 Xmpt: Yb:1984 Sqft:2,184 Asd:$265,500 Imp:73% Un:1 Doc#:147575 Tr: 15633-00 Lot: U-0542 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 3.0 Lotsz: 3,484 29 ) Prc1:632-311-038 Site:283 GREEN MOUNTAIN DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:LEDINGHAM,BRYAN R & G Mail:1480 DUCHESS AVE 1204*W VANCOUVER CANAD Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn:PR Sale:$195,000F Date:04/11/97 Loans:$140, 000 Xmpt: Yb:1983 Sqft:1,520 Asd:$198, 900 Imp:76% Un:1 Doc#:123206 Tr: 15633-00 Lot: U-0544 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 1.7 Lotsz: 3, 049 30 ) Prc1:632-311-043 Site:273 GREEN MOUNTAIN DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:GORMAN,NANCY Mail:2360 PALMER DR*SCHAUMBURG IL 60173 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn:PR Sale:$372,500 Date:12/02/98 Loans: Xmpt: Yb:1984 Sqft:2, 184 Asd:$265,500 Imp:73% Un:1 Doc#:523828 Tr: 15633-00 Lot: U-0549 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 3 .0 Lotsz: 3,484 31 ) Prc1:632-311-047 Site:265 GREEN MOUNTAIN DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:GOTTLIEB,LEON & ARLEN Mail:4601 SENDERO PL*TARZANA CA 91356 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn:PR Sale:$272,500F Date:05/28/98 Loans:$218, 000 Xmpt: Yb:1984 Sqft:2, 184 Asd:$265,500 Imp:73% Un:1 Doc#:217156 Tr: 15633-00 Lot: U-0553 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 3 .0 Lotsz: 3,484 32 ) Prc1:632-311-048 Site:263 GREEN MOUNTAIN DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:HOLLY TRUST Mail:6512 NANCY RD*RANCHO PALOS VERDES CA 90275 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn:PR Sale:$435, 000F Date:02/16/99 Loans: Xmpt: Yb:1984 Sqft:2,679 Asd:$331, 059 Imp:65% Un:1 Doc#:58475 Tr: 15633-00 Lot: U-0554 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 3 .0 Lotsz: 4,356 33 ) Prc1:632-311-053 Site:380 SADDLEHORN TRL*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:BRUCE,DONALD C & BRET Mail:1450 DOROTHEA RD*LA HABRA CA 90631 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn:PR Sale:$272,500F Date:06/18/99 Loans:$210, 000 Xmpt: Yb:1984 Sqft:1,746 Asd:$235, 000 Imp:74% Un:1 Doc#:271423 Tr: 15633-00 Lot: U-0376 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 1.7 Lotsz: 2,613 34 ) Prc1:632-311-056 Site:386 SADDLEHORN TRL*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:STANDISH TRUST Mail:2739 ASHGROVE ST*COLORADO SPRINGS CO 80906 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn:PR Sale:$285, 000F Date:06/04/99 Loans:$228, 000 Xmpt: Yb:1984 Sqft:1,819 Asd:$250, 000 Imp:70% Un:1 Doc#:245700 Tr: 15633-00 Lot: U-0379 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 2.2 Lotsz: 3, 049 35 ) Prc1:632-311-061 ` Site:396 SADDLEHORN TRL*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:OLIVER,NORMA E JR & D Mail:396 SADDLEHORN TRL*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: (760) 776-1093 Zn:PR Sale:$360,000F Date:01/06/97 Loans:$288, 000 Xmpt:Y Yb:1985 Sgft:2,764 Asd:$312,120 Imp:70% Un:1 Doc#:2941 Tr: 15633-00 Lot: U-0384 Bdrms: 3 Bths: 3.2 Lotsz: 4,356 36 ) Prc1:632-311-063 Site:402 SADDLEHORN TRL*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:DALLEY,JAMES S & LOIS Mail:24 CARY LN*BLOOMFIELD CT 06002 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn:PR Sale:$325, 000F Date:11/30/98 Loans: Xmpt: Yb:1984 Sgft:2,216 Asd:$270,300 Imp:81% Un:1 Doc#:517259 Tr: 15633-00 Lot: U-0387 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 3 .0 Lotsz: 3,484 THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS SOURCED FROM PUBLIC DOCUMENTS AND IS NOT GUARANTEED Copyright (C) 1998 Acxiom Corporation Page 5 37 ) Prc1:632-311-065 Site:406 SADDLEHORN TRL*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:ROSS,RONALD R & CAROL Mail:406 SADDLEHORN TRL*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: (760) 345-2429 Zn:PR Sale:$265, 000F Date:07/14/98 Loans:$125, 000 Xmpt: Yb:1986 Sqft:1,819 Asd:$225,487 Imp:70% Un:1 Doc#:289303 Tr: 15633-00 Lot: U-0389 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 2.2 Lotsz: 3,049 38 ) Prc1:632-312-032 Site:310 SUNDANCE CIR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:POLLART,DAVID G & JEA Mail:1150 ALKI AVE SW*SEATTLE WA 98116 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn:PR Sale:$320, 000F Date:03/26/97 Loans:$256, 000 Xmpt: Yb:1985 Sqft:1,837 Asd:$326,400 Imp:78% Un:1 Doc#:100646 Tr: 15633-00 Lot: U-0506 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 1.7 Lotsz: 2,613 39 ) Prc1:632-312-036 Site:318 SUNDANCE CIR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:ROMANOFF,DONALD A & M Mail:19609 LINNET ST*TARZANA CA 91356 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn:PR Sale:$196, 000F Date:10/06/97 Loans: Xmpt: Yb:1985 Sqft:1,746 Asd:$196,000 Imp:69% Un:1 Doc#:363623 Tr: 15633-00 Lot: U-0510 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 1.7 Lotsz: 2,613 40 ) Prc1:632-312-037 Site:320 SUNDANCE CIR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:ROGERS,CLIFFORD M & A Mai1:28840 ROCKLEDGE DR*FARMINGTON MI 48334 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn:PR Sale:$220,000 Date:04/07/98 Loans: Xmpt: Yb:1985 Sqft:1,746 Asd:$223, 046 Imp:72% Un:1 Doc#:131322 Tr: 15633-00 Lot: U-0511 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 1.7 Lotsz: 2,613 41 ) Prc1:632-312-038 Site:322 SUNDANCE CIR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:MACKLIN,CARL H & PATR Mail:5300 ORRVILLE AVE*WOODLAND HILLS CA 91367 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn:PR Sale:$66,500 Date:06/22/99 Loans: Xmpt: Yb:1984 Sqft:2,294 Asd:$244,855 Imp:78% Un:1 Doc#:274877 Tr: 15633-00 Lot: U-0512 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 2.5 Lotsz: 3,484 42 ) Prc1:632-312-041 Site:328 SUNDANCE CIR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:MCCLURE,JOHN Mail:328 SUNDANCE CIR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn:PR Sale:$200,000F Date:08/29/97 Loans:$160,000 Xmpt:Y Yb:1985 Sqft:1,746 Asd:$200, 000 Imp:75% Un:1 Doc#:316107 Tr: 15633-00 Lot: U-0515 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 1.7 Lotsz: 2,613 43 ) Prc1:632-312-043 Site:332 SUNDANCE CIR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:TEMPLETON,MARIAN E Mail:332 SUNDANCE CIR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: (760) 340-6012 Zn:PR Sale:$250, 000F Date:01/15/97 Loans: Xmpt:Y Yb:1984 Sgft:1,819 Asd:$253, 980 Imp:71% Un:1 Doc#:14889 Tr: 15633-00 Lot: U-0517 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 2.2 Lotsz: 3, 049 a 44 ) Prc1:632-312-045 Site:336 SUNDANCE CIR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:STEINMETZ,WILLIAM A & Mail:604 VIA SONOMA*PALOS VERDES PENINSU CA 90274 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn:PR Sale:$325,000F Date:05/19/98 Loans:$260,000 Xmpt: Yb:1984 Sgft:2,216 Asd:$276,036 Imp:84% Un:1 Doc#:200269 Tr: 15633-00 Lot: U-0519 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 3 .0 Lotsz: 3,484 45 ) Prc1:632-312-050 Site:346 SUNDANCE CIR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:GREIG,DOUGLAS J & CAR Mail:1516 STONY CREEK DR*ROCHESTER MI 48307 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn:PR Sale:$800,000F Date:05/24/99 Loans: Xmpt: Yb:1984 Sqft:2,764 Asd:$380,000 Imp:73% Un:1 Doc#:224375 Tr: 15633-00 Lot: U-0524 Bdrms: 3 Bths: 3 .2 Lotsz: 4,356 THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS SOURCED FROM PUBLIC DOCUMENTS AND IS NOT GUARANTEED Copyright (C) 1998 Acxiom Corporation I Page 6 46 ) Prc1:632-312-052 Site:337 SUNDANCE CIR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:ELIASON,DONALD R & KA Mail:PO BOX 219*SAINT GERMAIN WI 54558 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: (715) 542-3665 Zn:PR Sale:$335,000F Date:02/17/98 Loans: Xmpt: Yb:1984 Sqft:2,679 Asd:$347, 126 Imp:80% Un:1 Doc#:53899 Tr: 15633-00 Lot: U-0527 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 3.0 Lotsz: 4,356 47 ) Prc1:632-312-053 Site:335 SUNDANCE CIR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:NIESLEY TRUST Mail:335 SUNDANCE CIR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn:PR Sale:$335, 000F Date:05/19/99 Loans: Xmpt: Yb:1984 Sqft:2,216 Asd:$271,500 Imp:73% Un:1 Doc#:217637 Tr: 15633-00 Lot: U-0528 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 3 .0 Lotsz: 3,484 48 ) Prc1:632-312-054 Site:333 SUNDANCE CIR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:LAMBERT,ROBERT M & KA Mail:2522 WALNUT RD*ORLANDO OK 73073 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn:PR Sale:$375, 000F Date:05/07/98 Loans:$300, 000 Xmpt: Yb:1984 Sqft:2,679 Asd:$339,500 Imp:70% Un:1 Doc#:181078 Tr: 15633-00 Lot: U-0529 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 3.0 Lotsz: 4,356 49 ) Prc1:632-312-059 Site:424 RUNNING SPRINGS DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:EADS,WILLIAM T & DONN Mail:424 RUNNING SPRINGS DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn:CP Sale:$410, 000F Date:05/14/97 Loans:$328,000 Xmpt: Yb:1987 Sqft:2,679 Asd:$418,200 Imp:75% Un:1 Doc#:168617 Tr: 15633-00 Lot: U-0333 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 3.0 Lotsz: 2,613 50 ) Prc1:632-312-060 Site:426 RUNNING SPRINGS DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:CARTER,STEVE & JENNIF Mai1:426 RUNNING SPRINGS DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn:CP Sale:$350, 000F Date:02/19/99 Loans:$280, 000 Xmpt: Yb:1987 Sqft:2,679 Asd:$335, 056 Imp:74% Un:1 Doc#:67059 Tr: 15633-00 Lot: U-0334 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 3 .0 Lotsz: 3, 049 51 ) Prc1:632-312-061 Site:428 RUNNING SPRINGS DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:SHARP,LARRY D & LORRA Mai1:26219 BIRCHFIELD AVE*RANCHO PALOS VERDE 90275 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: (760) 773-0020 Zn:CP Sale:$420,000F Date:12/11/97 Loans:$214,600 Xmpt: Yb:1987 Sqft:2,764 Asd:$420,000 Imp:76% Un:1 Doc#:455463 Tr: 15633-00 Lot: U-0335 Bdrms: 3 Bths: 3.2 Lotsz: 2,613 52 ) Prc1:632-312-078 Site:395 SADDLEHORN TRL*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:SMITH, FREDRICK T Mail:395 SADDLEHORN TRL*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn:CP Sale:$475, 000F Date:01/28/98 Loans: Xmpt:Y Yb:1985 Sqft:2,596 Asd:$334,000 Imp:70% Un:1 Doc#:30200 Tr: 15633-00 Lot: U-0352 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 3.0 Lotsz: 2,613 53 ) Prc1:632-312-080 a Site:387 SADDLEHORN TRL*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:CARLSON TRUST Mail:387 SADDLEHORN TRL*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn:CP Sale:$860, 000F Date:03/06/98 Loans:$600, 000 Xmpt: Yb:1985 Sqft:4,276 Asd:$570, 000 Imp:73% Un:1 Doc#:82004 Tr: 15633-00 Lot: U-0354 Bdrms: 3 Bths: 4 .0 Lotsz: 4,356 54 ) Prc1:632-312-083 Site:377 SADDLEHORN TRL*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:SAMPSON,JOHN J & GAIL Mail:11617 SHOSHONE WAY*DENVER CO 80234 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn:CP Sale:$700, 000F Date:12/02/96 Loans:$650,000 Xmpt: Yb:1986 Sqft:3, 971 Asd:$560,000 Imp:74% Un:1 Doc#:454864 Tr: 15633-00 Lot: U-0357 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 3 .2 Lotsz: 4,356 THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS SOURCED FROM PUBLIC DOCUMENTS AND IS NOT GUARANTEED Copyright (C) 1998 Acxiom Corporation Page 7 55 ) Prc1:632-312-085 Site:369 SADDLEHORN TRL*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:ECKMAN,CHARLES C & TE Mail:619 LAKESIDE DR*FULLERTON CA 92835 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn:CP Sale:$955,000F Date:03/26/99 Loans:$750, 000 Xmpt: Yb:1986 Sqft:3,784 Asd:$480,000 Imp:73% Un:1 Doc#:126187 Tr: 15633-00 Lot: U-0359 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 3.2 Lotsz: 3,484 56 ) Prc1:632-312-086 Site:363 SADDLEHORN TRL*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:BAILEY TRUST Mail:363 SADDLEHORN TRL*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn:CP Sale:$760,000F Date:05/07/99 Loans: Xmpt: Yb:1985 Sqft:3,514 Asd:$495, 000 Imp:73% Un:1 Doc#:197758 Tr: 15633-00 Lot: U-0360 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 3.2 Lotsz: 3,484 57 ) Prc1:632-312-090 Site:372 SADDLEHORN TRL*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:JENKINS,ETHEL J Mail:1820 WILLOW OAK CIR*SALT LAKE CITY UT 84121 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn:CP Sale:$315,000F Date:10/17/97 Loans: Xmpt: Yb:1986 Sqft:2,216 Asd:$315,000 Imp:68% Un:1 Doc#:377574 Tr: 15633-00 Lot: U-0372 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 3 .0 Lotsz: 2,613 58 ) Prc1:632-312-091 Site:374 SADDLEHORN TRL*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:CALDERON,ALBERT & DOR Mail:13331 WESTCOVE DR*LOS ANGELES CA 90049 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: (310) 476-1584 Zn:CP Sale:$310,000 Date:05/21/98 Loans: Xmpt: Yb:1986 Sqft:2,294 Asd:$262,172 Imp:72% Un:1 Doc#:206269 Tr: 15633-00 Lot: U-0373 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 2.5 Lotsz: 2,613 59 ) Prc1:632-312-092 Site:376 SADDLEHORN TRL*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:HOLDEN,HERBERT A & DI Mail:2813 BAYVIEW DR*ALAMEDA CA 94501 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: (760) 837-1567 Zn:CP Sale:$245,000F Date:07/10/97 Loans:$196, 000 Xmpt: Yb:1986 Sqft:1,819 Asd:$245,000 Imp:71% Un:1 Doc#:243345 Tr: 15633-00 Lot: U-0374 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 2.2 Lotsz: 2, 178 60 ) Prc1:632-313-004 Site:366 RUNNING SPRINGS DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:MCCALL,T D & B J Mail:1822 BREAKENRIDGE CT*KAMLOOPS B C CANAD Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn:CP Sale:$210, 000F Date:10/20/98 Loans:$120, 000 Xmpt: Yb:1987 Sqft:1,368 Asd:$46, 042 Imp:52% Un:1 Doc#:451827 Tr: 15633-00 Lot: U-0309 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 1.7 Lotsz: 2,613 61 ) Prc1:632-313-006 Site:370 RUNNING SPRINGS DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:VANPUTTEN,RUTH Mail:7645 TIMBER BLUFF DR SE*ADA MI 49301 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: (616) 676-8185 Zn:CP Sale:$240, 000F Date:04/09/97 Loans:$192,000 Xmpt: Yb:1987 Sqft:1,746 Asd:$244,800 Imp:75% Un:1 Doc#:120470 Tr: 15633-00 Lot: U-0311 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 1.7 Lotsz: 2,613 62 ) Prc1:632-313-010 ° Site:378 RUNNING SPRINGS DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:DILLEY,RONALD L Mail:344 W ARROW HWY*SAN DIMAS CA 91773 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: (909) 394-1985 Zn:CP Sale:$190, 000F Date:01/15/98 Loans: Xmpt: Yb:1987 Sqft:1,746 Asd:$226, 168 Imp:72% Un:1 Doc#:13963 Tr: 15633-00 Lot: U-0315 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 1.7 Lotsz: 2,613 63 ) Prc1:632-313-014 Site:386 RUNNING SPRINGS DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:DESMOND,MEREDITH G Mail:PO BOX 1012*CENTER OSSIPEE NH 03814 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn:CP Sale:$196, 000F Date:12/11/97 Loans: Xmpt: Yb:1987 Sqft:1,368 Asd:$177,500 Imp:71% Un:1 Doc#:455462 Tr: 15633-00 Lot: U-0319 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 1.7 Lotsz: 2,613 THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS SOURCED FROM PUBLIC DOCUMENTS AND IS NOT GUARANTEED Copyright (C) 1998 Acxiom Corporation Page 8 64 ) Prc1:632-313-019 Site:406 RUNNING SPRINGS DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:JACOBS,BARNETT L & SH Mai1:406 RUNNING SPRINGS DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn:CP Sale:$328,000 Date:07/13/98 Loans: Xmpt: Yb:1987 Sqft:2, 184 Asd:$289,500 Imp:73% Un:1 Doc#:287560 Tr: 15633-00 Lot: U-0324 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 3.0 Lotsz: 3,484 65 ) Prc1:632-313-022 Site:412 RUNNING SPRINGS DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:HAGLUND,E A & BARBARA Mail:5433 S QUAIL RIDGE CIR*SPOKANE WA 99223 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: (509) 448-2033 Zn:CP Sale:$315, 000F Date:04/25/97 Loans: Xmpt: Yb:1987 Sqft:2,184 Asd:$294,780 Imp:72% Un:1 Doc#:140565 Tr: 15633-00 Lot: U-0327 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 3 .0 Lotsz: 3,484 66 ) Prc1:632-313-024 Site:416 RUNNING SPRINGS DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:BENNETT,CHARLES A Mail:PO BOX 7000-420*REDONDO BEACH CA 90277 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn:CP Sale:$325,000F Date:04/30/99 Loans:$227,500 Xmpt: Yb:1987 Sqft:2, 184 Asd:$289,500 Imp:73% Un:1 Doc#:184378 Tr: 15633-00 Lot: U-0329 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 3.0 Lotsz: 3,484 67 ) Prc1:632-313-025 Site:418 RUNNING SPRINGS DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:HOBLEY,DONALD N & NAN Mail:6010 SIMSBURY CT*WEST BLOOMFIELD MI 48322 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn:CP Sale:$405,000F Date:07/30/98 Loans: Xmpt: Yb:1987 Sqft:2,764 Asd:$385, 000 Imp:74% Un:1 Doc#:316038 Tr: 15633-00 Lot: U-0330 Bdrms: 3 Bths: 3 .2 Lotsz: 4,356 68 ) Prc1:632-330-004 Site:266 TAVA LN*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:GONZALES,ALFRED R Mail:266 TAVA LN*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn:Rl Sale:$69,000F Date:05/20/98 Loans:$69, 000 Xmpt: Yb:1984 Sgft:991 Asd:$81, 057 Imp:69% Un:1 Doc#:204081 Tr: 19847-01 Lot: L-0004 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 2.0 Lotsz: 1,742 69 ) Prc1:632-330-017 Site:261 TAVA LN*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:PERKINS,JOSEPH A & NA Mail:261 TAVA LN*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn:Rl Sale:$90,000 Date:02/26/99 Loans:$89,862 Xmpt: Yb:1984 Sqft:965 Asd:$81, 057 Imp:69% Un:1 Doc#:76346 Tr: 19847-01 Lot: L-0017 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 2.0 Lotsz: 2, 178 70 ) Prc1:632-330-020 Site:267 TAVA LN*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:EVERETT,ROBERT J Mail:605 17TH ST*MANHATTAN BEACH CA 90266 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn:Rl Sale:$75,000F Date:03/03/97 Loans: Xmpt: Yb:1984 Sqft:965 Asd:$76,500 Imp:73% Un:1 Doc#:70048 Tr: 19847-01 Lot: L-0020 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 2.0 Lotsz: 2, 178 71 ) Prc1:632-330-057 ° Site:457 TAVA LN*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:GREVE,DAVID W & ROSE Mail:14020 ROSECRANS AVE*SANTA FE SPRINGS CA 90670 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn:Rl Sale:$60,000F Date:01/31/97 Loans: Xmpt: Yb:1984 Sqft:991 Asd:$61,200 Imp:75% Un:1 Doc#:35375 Tr: 19847-01 Lot: L-0057 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 2.0 Lotsz: 1,742 72 ) Prc1:632-330-059 Site:453 TAVA LN*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:DEVER,ROBERT P Mail:453 TAVA LN*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: (760) 341-7816 Zn:Rl Sale:$80, 000F Date:09/26/97 Loans:$76, 000 Xmpt:Y Yb:1984 Sqft:1,288 Asd:$80,000 Imp:75% Un:1 Doc#:351484 Tr: 19847-01 Lot: L-0059 Bdrms: 3 Bths: 2.0 Lotsz: 1,742 THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS SOURCED FROM PUBLIC DOCUMENTS AND IS NOT GUARANTEED Copyright (C) 1998 Acxiom Corporation Page 9 73 ) Prc1:632-330-060 Site:451 TAVA LN*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:MARQUER,ANDRE Mail:451 TAVA LN*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn:Rl Sale:$69, 000F Date:06/23/98 Loans:$48,640 Xmpt: Yb:1984 Sqft:991 Asd:$81,057 Imp:69% Un:1 Doc#:255528 Tr: 19847-01 Lot: L-0060 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 2.0 Lotsz: 1,742 74 ) Prc1:632-330-061 Site:410 TAVA LN*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:SYLVESTER,DIANE M Mail:410 TAVA LN*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn:Rl Sale:$69,500F Date:10/21/98 Loans:$69, 124 Xmpt: Yb:1984 Sqft:991 Asd:$65,000 Imp:69% Un:1 Doc#:454312 Tr: 19847-01 Lot: L-0061 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 2.0 Lotsz: 1,742 75 ) Prc1:632-330-067 Site:445 TAVA LN*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:FARRIS,KELLY Mail:445 TAVA LN*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn:Rl Sale:$89,500 Date:03/12/99 Loans: Xmpt: Yb:1984 Sqft:1,288 Asd:$75, 000 Imp:73% Un:1 Doc#:102220 Tr: 19847-01 Lot: L-0067 Bdrms: 3 Bths: 2.0 Lotsz: 2,178 76 ) Prc1:632-330-070 Site:439 TAVA LN*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:FLANNERY,WILLIAM T & Mail:79335 DESERT ROCK CT*LA QUINTA CA 92253 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn:Rl Sale:$77,500F Date:06/18/99 Loans:$67,500 Xmpt: Yb:1984 Sqft:1,288 Asd:$87,293 Imp:71% Un:1 Doc#:271119 Tr: 19847-01 Lot: L-0070 Bdrms: 3 Bths: 2.0 Lotsz: 2, 178 77 ) Prc1:632-330-072 Site:435 TAVA LN*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:AUSTIN,JUDITH J & BRI Mail:41950 HARRISON DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn:Rl Sale:$67, 500F Date:10/24/97 Loans: Xmpt:Y Yb:1984 Sqft:991 Asd:$67,500 Imp:70% Un:1 Doc#:386202 Tr: 19847-01 Lot: L-0072 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 2.0 Lotsz: 2, 178 78 ) Prc1:632-330-078 Site:423 TAVA LN*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:HANCOCK,JOHN I & LOUI Mail:701 CROWN HBR*CORPUS CHRISTI TX 78402 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn:R1 Sale:$79,000 Date:10/01/96 Loans: Xmpt: Yb:1984 Sqft:1,288 Asd:$80, 580 Imp:74% Un:1 Doc#:390321 Tr: 19847-01 Lot: L-0078 Bdrms: 3 Bths: 2.0 Lotsz: 2, 178 79 ) Prc1:632-330-082 Site:415 TAVA LN*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:LUDICK,MEGAN L Mail:415 TAVA LN*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn:R1 Sale:$75, 000F Date:04/28/97 Loans:$74,511 Xmpt: Yb:1984 Sqft:1,288 Asd:$76,500 Imp:73% Un:1 Doc#:144142 Tr: 19847-01 Lot: L-0082 Bdrms: 3 Bths: 2.0 Lotsz: 2, 178 80 ) Prc1:632-361-036 ` Site:41550 CARLOTTA DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:BUCKLIN,GERALD S & TA Mail:41550 CARLOTTA DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: Zn:CP Sale:$190, 545F Date:05/29/97 Loans:$181, 000 Xmpt:Y Yb:1990 Sqft:2,119 Asd:$194,412 Imp:73% Un:1 Doc#:188522 Tr: 21338-01 Lot: L-0036 Bdrms: 3 Bths: 2.7 Lotsz: 9, 147 81 ) Prc1:632-361-038 Site:75733 SANDCASTLE LN*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:ELBAUM,MATT & PAMELA Mail:75733 SANDCASTLE LN*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: Zn:CP Sale:$195, 000F Date:06/30/98 Loans:$156,000 Xmpt: Yb:1989 Sqft:2, 119 Asd:$223,254 Imp:74% Un:1 Doc#:269031 Tr: 21338-01 Lot: L-0038 Bdrms: 3 Bths: 2.7 Lotsz: 7,405 THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS SOURCED FROM PUBLIC DOCUMENTS AND IS NOT GUARANTEED Copyright (C) 1998 Acxiom Corporation Page 10 82 ) Prc1:632-390-008 Site:41310 CARLOTTA DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:GROAT,MICHAEL P & TAM Mail:41321 JAMAICA SANDS DR*INDIO CA 92201 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: Zn:CP Sale:$224, 000F Date:05/05/98 Loans: Xmpt: Yb:1990 Sqft:2,562 Asd:$250, 148 Imp:70% Un:1 Doc#:176163 Tr: 21338-00 Lot: L-0008 Bdrms: 4 Bths: 2.7 Lotsz: 8,276 83 ) Prc1:632-390-011 Site:41250 CARLOTTA DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:RHODES TRUST Mail:41250 CARLOTTA DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: Zn:CP Sale:$275,000F Date:06/28/99 Loans: Xmpt: Yb:1990 Sqft:2,562 Asd:$293,696 Imp:73% Un:1 Doc#:287778 Tr: 21338-00 Lot: L-0011 Bdrms: 4 Bths: 2.7 Lotsz: 7,405 84 ) Prc1:632-390-017 Site:41130 CARLOTTA DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:ENSIGN,JOSEPH D & RUT Mail:41130 CARLOTTA DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: Zn:CP Sale:$250, 000 Date:05/29/98 Loans:$175, 000 Xmpt: Yb:1990 Sqft:2,562 Asd:$264,682 Imp:75% Un:1 Doc#:219181 Tr: 21338-00 Lot: L-0017 Bdrms: 4 Bths: 2.7 Lotsz: 7,405 85 ) Prc1:632-390-026 Site:41215 CARLOTTA DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:MASON,BRADLEY W & KAT Mail:41215 CARLOTTA DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: Zn:CP Sale:$279, 000F Date:04/30/98 Loans:$223,200 Xmpt: Yb:1990 Sgft:2, 900 Asd:$275,000 Imp:74% Un:1 Doc#:170822 Tr: 21338-00 Lot: L-0026 Bdrms: 4 Bths: 3 .0 Lotsz: 8,276 86 ) Prc1:632-390-031 Site:41315 CARLOTTA DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:BAYER,MARK J & CAROL Mail:41315 CARLOTTA DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: Zn:CP Sale:$243, 000F Date:11/26/96 Loans:$142,700 Xmpt:Y Yb:1990 Sqft:2,646 Asd:$247,860 Imp:75% Un:1 Doc#:450969 Tr: 21338-00 Lot: L-0031 Bdrms: 4 Bths: 3 .0 Lotsz: 8,276 87 ) Prc1:632-390-037 Site:41435 CARLOTTA DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:BABCOCK,RANDY & COLLE Mail:41435 CARLOTTA DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: Zn:CP Sale:$272, 000F Date:12/17/98 Loans:$240,000 Xmpt: Yb:1990 Sqft:2,646 Asd:$245,000 Imp:73% Un:1 Doc#:546896 Tr: 21338-00 Lot: L-0037 Bdrms: 4 Bths: 3.0 Lotsz: 8,276 88 ) Prc1:632-390-038 Site:41455 CARLOTTA DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:PARKINSON,DONALD W & Mai1:642 ALONDRA BLVD*CARSON CA 90746 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: Zn:CP Sale:$275, 000F Date:06/01/99 Loans:$125,288 Xmpt: Yb:1990 Sgft:2, 900 Asd:$280, 000 Imp:71% Un:1 Doc#:240326 Tr: 21338-00 Lot: L-0038 Bdrms: 4 Bths: 3 .0 Lotsz: 7,405 89 ) Prc1:632-440-042 Site:17 FLORENCE LN*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:MATHIESON,JUNE G Mail:17 FLORENCE LN*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: Zn:CP Sale:$427,000F Date:05/07/98 Loans:$591,600 Xmpt: Yb:1993 Sqft:3,431 Asd:$380,000 Imp:67% Un:1 Doc#:181051 Tr: 25711-00 Lot: L-0091 Bdrms: 3 Bths: 3.2 Lotsz: 15,246 90 ) Prc1:632-480-022 Site:414 TAVA LN*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:PECK,KENNETH & GWEN Mail:9632 CHEVY CHASE DR*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: (714) 964-8302 Zn: Sale:$94, 000F Date:11/27/96 Loans:$84,600 Xmpt: Yb:1994 Sgft:1,288 Asd:$95,880 Imp:78% Un:1 Doc#:452137 Tr: 19847-03 Lot: L-0022 Bdrms: 3 Bths: 2.0 Lotsz: 1,742 THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS SOURCED FROM PUBLIC DOCUMENTS AND IS NOT GUARANTEED Copyright (C) 1998 Acxiom Corporation Page 11 91 ) Prc1:632-480-032 Site:434 TAVA LN*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:LANGE, PATRICK W & CAT Mail:1919 KELLERTON DR*HACIENDA HEIGHTS CA 91745 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn: Sale:$85,000F Date:12/30/98 Loans:$63, 000 Xmpt: Yb:1992 Sqft:991 Asd:$98,838 Imp:78% Un:1 Doc#:565156 Tr: 19847-03 Lot: L-0032 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 2.0 Lotsz: 1,742 92 ) Prc1:632-480-033 Site:436 TAVA LN*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:CUNNINGHAM,NANCY Mail:436 TAVA LN*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn: Sale:$72,636F Date:06/16/98 Loans:$67,900 Xmpt: Yb:1992 Sqft:991 Asd:$89,414 Imp:76% Un:1 Doc#:245218 Tr: 19847-03 Lot: L-0033 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 2.0 Lotsz: 1,742 93 ) Prc1:632-480-037 Site:444 TAVA LN*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:YUKECH,CHARLES A & CH Mail:21022 SEQUOIA LN*MISSION VIEJO CA 92691 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn: Sale:$92,500F Date:07/30/99 Loans:$74, 000 Xmpt: Yb:1992 Sqft:991 Asd:$62,016 Imp:67% Un:1 Doc#:341164 Tr: 19847-03 Lot: L-0037 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 2.0 Lotsz: 1,742 94 ) Prc1:632-480-038 Site:446 TAVA LN*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:DIVEN,JOSEPH F Mail:446 TAVA LN*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn: Sale:$89, 000F Date:11/05/96 Loans:$71,200 Xmpt:Y Yb:1992 Sqft:1,288 Asd:$90,780 Imp:77% Un:1 Doc#:424581 Tr: 19847-03 Lot: L-0038 Bdrms: 3 Bths: 2.0 Lotsz: 1,742 a THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS SOURCED FROM PUBLIC DOCUMENTS AND IS NOT GUARANTEED Copyright (C) 1998 Acxiom Corporation ********************************************** * Acxiom/DataQuick Systems Report * * * Riverside ********************************************** Prepared for: Provided by: LANDAMERICA Account Rep: 777 TAHQUITZ CANYON WAY#200 Prepared by: PALM SPRINGS, CA. 92264 (760) 320-1650 ****************************************************************************** * Farms - 5 line : records 1 to 80 * * * --- Search Criteria --- * New Map Pg-Grid 819-A5 OR 818-A4 * Sale Date 9/96 TO 9/99 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 80 matching properties were found Wed Sep 15 16:18 :22 1999 ***********************. ****************************************************** ** This information is sourced from public documents and is not guaranteed ** The following report was processed using the above parameters and was provided by of LANDAMERICA Page 1 1 ) Prc1:009-602-449 Site:40990 PAXTON DR 2*RANCHO MIRAGE CA 92270 Ownr:QVALE,BJARNE & HOPE Mail:4067 LADERA VISTA RD*FALLBROOK CA 92028 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn: Sale:$212,500P Date:06/01/97 Loans: Xmpt: Yb:1957 Sqft:1,485 Asd:$216,750 Imp:0% Un:1 Doc#:214721 Tr: - Lot: - Bdrms: 2 Bths: 2.0 Lotsz: 4 .00 A 2 ) Prc1:009-602-450 Site:40990 PAXTON DR 3*RANCHO MIRAGE CA 92270 Ownr:QVALE,BJARNE & HOPE Mail:4067 LADERA VISTA RD*FALLBROOK CA 92028 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn: Sale:$212,500P Date:06/01/97 Loans: Xmpt: Yb:1957 Sqft:1,446 Asd:$143, 022 Imp:0% Un:1 Doc#:214721 Tr: - Lot: - Bdrms: 1 Bths: 2.0 Lotsz: 4 .00 A 3 ) Prc1:009-602-451 Site:40990 PAXTON DR 4*RANCHO MIRAGE CA 92270 Ownr:QVALE,BJARNE & HOPE Mail:4067 LADERA VISTA RD*FALLBROOK CA 92028 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn: Sale:$212, 500P Date:06/01/97 Loans: Xmpt: Yb:1957 Sqft:1, 136 Asd:$114,486 Imp:0% Un:1 Doc#:214721 Tr: - Lot: - Bdrms: 2 Bths: 2 .0 Lotsz: 4 .00 A 4 ) Prc1:009-602-452 Site:40990 PAXTON DR 5*RANCHO MIRAGE CA 92270 Ownr:QVALE,BJARNE & HOPE Mail:4067 LADERA VISTA RD*FALLBROOK CA 92028 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn: Sale:$212, 500P Date:06/01/97 Loans: Xmpt: Yb:1957 Sqft:1,539 Asd:$32,672 Imp:0% Un:1 Doc#:214721 Tr: - Lot: - Bdrms: 2 Bths: 2.0 Lotsz: 4 .00 A 5 ) Prc1:009-602-453 Site:40990 PAXTON DR 6*RANCHO MIRAGE CA 92270 Ownr:QVALE,BJARNE & HOPE Mail:4067 LADERA VISTA RD*FALLBROOK CA 92028 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn: Sale:$212, 500P Date:06/01/97 Loans: Xmpt: Yb:1957 Sqft:1,423 Asd:$34, 994 Imp:0% Un:1 Doc#:214721 Tr: - Lot: - Bdrms: 2 Bths: 2.0 Lotsz: 4 .00 A 6 ) Prc1:009-602-454 Site:40990 PAXTON DR 7*RANCHO MIRAGE CA 92270 Ownr:QVALE,BJARNE & HOPE Mail:4067 LADERA VISTA RD*FALLBROOK CA 92028 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: Zn: Sale:$212,500P Date:06/01/97 Loans: Xmpt: Yb: Sqft: Asd:$155,701 Imp:0% Un:1 Doc#:214721 Tr: - Lot: - Bdrms: Bths: Lotsz: 4.00 A 7 ) Prc1:009-602-455 Site:40990 PAXTON DR 8*RANCHO MIRAGE CA 92270 Ownr:QVALE,BJARNE & HOPE Mail:4067 LADERA VISTA RD*FALLBROOK CA 92028 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: Zn: Sale:$212,500P Date:06/01/97 Loans: Xmpt: Yb: Sqft: Asd:$118, 160 Imp:0% Un:1 Doc#:214721 Tr: - Lot: - Bdrms: Bths: Lotsz: 4 .00 A 8 ) Prc1:009-602-456 ° Site:40990 PAXTON DR 9*RANCHO MIRAGE CA 92270 Ownr:QVALE,BJARNE & HOPE Mail:4067 LADERA VISTA RD*FALLBROOK CA 92028 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn: Sale:$212,500P Date:06/01/97 Loans: Xmpt: Yb:1957 Sgft:1,502 Asd:$118,795 Imp:0% Un:1 Doc#:214721 Tr: - Lot: - Bdrms: 1 Bths: 2.0 Lotsz: 4 .00 A 9 ) Prc1:009-602-457 Site:40990 PAXTON DR 10*RANCHO MIRAGE CA 92270 Ownr:QVALE,BJARNE & HOPE Mail:4067 LADERA VISTA RD*FALLBROOK CA 92028 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn: Sale:$212,500P Date:06/01/97 Loans: Xmpt: Yb:1957 Sgft:1,306 Asd:$112, 955 Imp:75% Un:1 Doc#:214721 Tr: - Lot: - Bdrms: 2 Bths: 2.0 Lotsz: 4 .00 A THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS SOURCED FROM PUBLIC DOCUMENTS AND IS NOT GUARANTEED Copyright (C) 1998 Acxiom Corporation ' Page 2 - 10 ) Prc1:009-602-458 Site:40990 PAXTON DR 11*RANCHO MIRAGE CA 92270 Ownr:QVALE,BJARNE & HOPE Mail:4067 LADERA VISTA RD*FALLBROOK CA 92028 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn: Sale:$212,500P Date:06/01/97 Loans: Xmpt: Yb:1957 Sgft:1,280 Asd:$112, 955 Imp:759s Un:1 Doc#:214721 Tr: - Lot: - Bdrms: 1 Bths: 2.0 Lotsz: 4 .00 A 11 ) Prc1:009-602-459 Site:40990 PAXTON DR 12*RANCHO MIRAGE CA 92270 Ownr:QVALE,BJARNE & HOPE Mail:4067 LADERA VISTA RD*FALLBROOK CA 92028 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn: Sale:$212,500P Date:06/01/97 Loans: Xmpt: Yb:1957 Sqft:1,676 Asd:$39,374 Imp:01,- Un:1 Doc#:214721 Tr: - Lot: - Bdrms: 2 Bths: 2.0 Lotsz: 4 .00 A 12 ) Prc1:009-602-460 Site:40990 PAXTON DR 14*RANCHO MIRAGE CA 92270 Ownr:QVALE,BJARNE & HOPE Mail:4067 LADERA VISTA RD*FALLBROOK CA 92028 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn: Sale:$212,500P Date:06/01/97 Loans: Xmpt: Yb:1957 Sqft:2,428 Asd:$106,445 Imp:0% Un:1 Doc#:214721 Tr: - Lot: - Bdrms: 2 Bths: 2.0 Lotsz: 4 .00 A 13 ) Prc1:009-602-461 Site:40990 PAXTON DR 15*RANCHO MIRAGE CA 92270 Ownr:QVALE,BJARNE & HOPE Mail:4067 LADERA VISTA RD*FALLBROOK CA 92028 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: Zn: Sale:$212,500P Date:06/01/97 Loans: Xmpt: Yb:1957 Sqft:1,446 Asd:$32, 956 Imp:09s Un:1 Doc#:214721 Tr: - Lot: - Bdrms: 1 Bths: 2.0 Lotsz: 4 .00 A 14 ) Prc1:009-602-462 Site:40990 PAXTON DR 16*RANCHO MIRAGE CA 92270 Ownr:QVALE,BJARNE & HOPE Mail:4067 LADERA VISTA RD*FALLBROOK CA 92028 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn: Sale:$212,500P Date:06/01/97 Loans: Xmpt: Yb:1957 Sqft:1,672 Asd:$37, 121 Imp:09s Un:1 Doc#:214721 Tr: - Lot: - Bdrms: 2 Bths: 2 .0 Lotsz: 4 .00 A 15 ) Prc1:009-602-463 Site:40990 PAXTON DR 18*RANCHO MIRAGE CA 92270 Ownr:QVALE,BJARNE & HOPE Mail:4067 LADERA VISTA RD*FALLBROOK CA 92028 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn: Sale:$212,500P Date:06/01/97 Loans: Xmpt: Yb:1957 Sqft:1,668 Asd:$157,810 Imp:78% Un:1 Doc#:214721 Tr: - Lot: - Bdrms: 2 Bths: 2.0 Lotsz: 4 .00 A 16 ) Prc1:009-602-464 Site:40990 PAXTON DR 19*RANCHO MIRAGE CA 92270 Ownr:QVALE,BJARNE & HOPE Mail:4067 LADERA VISTA RD*FALLBROOK CA 92028 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn: Sale:$212,500P Date:06/01/97 Loans: Xmpt: Yb:1957 Sqft:1,662 Asd:$49,346 Imp:0% Un:1 Doc#:214721 Tr: - Lot: - Bdrms: 2 Bths: 2 .0 Lotsz: 4.00 A 17 ) Prc1:632-330-006 % Site:270 TAVA LN*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:PHILLIPS,LLOYD A & HA Mail:270 TAVA LN*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: (760) 346-9179 Zn:Rl Sale:$79,500F Date:09/12/97 Loans: Xmpt: Yb:1984 Sqft:1,288 Asd:$79,500 Imp:749s Un:1 Doc#:332413 Tr: 19847-01 Lot: L-0006 Bdrms: 3 Bths: 2.0 Lotsz: 2, 178 18 ) Prc1:632-330-008 Site:274 TAVA LN*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:WOOD,CINDY H Mail:274 TAVA LN*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn:Rl Sale:$77, 000F Date:03/10/99 Loans:$50, 000 Xmpt: Yb:1984 Sqft:991 Asd:$65, 000 Imp:699s Un:1 Doc#:97382 Tr: 19847-01 Lot: L-0008 Bdrms: 2 Bths : 2 .0 Lotsz: 2, 178 THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS SOURCED FROM PUBLIC DOCUMENTS AND IS NOT GUARANTEED Copyright (C) 1998 Acxiom Corporation Page 3 ' 19 ) Prc1:632-330-021 Site:269 TAVA LN*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:MCGETRICK,MICHAEL S & Mail:26035 MOULTON PKY 208*LAGUNA HILLS CA 92653 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn:Rl Sale:$70,000 Date:07/29/99 Loans:$55,650 Xmpt: Yb:1984 Sqft:965 Asd:$65, 000 Imp:69% Un:1 Doc#:338710 Tr: 19847-01 Lot: L-0021 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 2 .0 Lotsz: 2, 178 20 ) Prc1:632-330-023 Site:273 TAVA LN*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:BARRETT,JACK H & FAIT Mail:56615 KISMET RD*YUCCA VALLEY CA 92284 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: (760) 365-2513 Zn:Rl Sale:$72, 000F Date:06/19/98 Loans: Xmpt: Yb:1984 Sqft:965 Asd:$75,799 Imp:67% Un:1 Doc#:252886 Tr: 19847-01 Lot: L-0023 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 2.0 Lotsz: 2, 178 21 ) Prc1:632-330-035 Site:281 TAVA LN*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:ERICSON TRUST Mail:281 TAVA LN*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn:Rl Sale:$70, 000F Date:11/24/98 Loans : Xmpt: Yb:1984 Sqft:965 Asd:$65, 000 Imp:69% Un:1 Doc#:511034 Tr: 19847-01 Lot: L-0035 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 2.0 Lotsz: 2, 178 22 ) Prc1:632-330-073 Site:356 TAVA LN*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:FAIR,JAMES E & WALLS Mail:356 TAVA LN*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn:Rl Sale:$62, 000F Date:07/25/97 Loans:$43,400 Xmpt: Yb:1984 Sqft:991 Asd:$62, 000 Imp:75% Un:1 Doc#:263815 Tr: 19847-01 Lot: L-0073 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 2 .0 Lotsz: 2, 178 23 ) Prc1:632-330-095 Site:405 TAVA LN*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:KING,RICHARD C Mail:405 TAVA LN*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn:Rl Sale:$80, 000F Date:03/10/99 Loans:$64,000 Xmpt: Yb:1984 Sgft:1,288 Asd:$89,250 Imp:72% Un:1 Doc#:97378 Tr: 19847-01 Lot: L-0095 Bdrms: 3 Bths: 2 .0 Lotsz: 2, 178 24 ) Prc1:632-361-004 Site:75707 EASY ST*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:SULLIVAN,WILLIAM A & Mail:7507 EASY ST*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: Zn:CP Sale:$195, 000 Date:02/11/99 Loans:$185,250 Xmpt: Yb:1989 Sqft:2, 119 Asd:$205, 000 Imp:68% Un: 1 Doc#:55474 Tr: 21338-01 Lot: L-0004 Bdrms: 3 Bths: 2.7 Lotsz: 6,534 25 ) Prc1:632-361-006 Site:75748 EASY ST*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:JACOBSON,WARREN & ZOE Mail:75748 EASY ST*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: Zn:CP Sale:$155, 000F Date:04/30/97 Loans:$139,275 Xmpt:Y Yb:1989 Sgft:1,851 Asd:$158, 100 Imp:74% Un:1 Doc#:147051 Tr: 21338-01 Lot: L-0006 Bdrms: 3 Bths: 1.7 Lotsz: 6, 098 26 ) Prc1:632-361-007 ° Site:75742 EASY ST*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:DRAVIS,NORMAN & CATHE Mail:75742 EASY ST*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: Zn:CP Sale:$160,000F Date:08/26/97 Loans: Xmpt:Y Yb:1989 Sqft:1,418 Asd:$160, 000 Imp:75% Un:1 Doc#:309870 Tr: 21338-01 Lot: L-0007 Bdrms: 3 Bths: 1.7 Lotsz: 6,534 27 ) Prc1:632-361-009 Site:75728 EASY ST*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:BERRYHILL,STEVEN M & Mail:75728 EASY ST*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: (760) 773-0367 Zn:CP Sale:$185, 000 Date:07/02/98 Loans:$175,750 Xmpt: Yb:1989 Sqft:2, 119 Asd:$230, 986 Imp:72% Un:1 Doc#:274229 Tr: 21338-01 Lot: L-0009 Bdrms: 3 Bths: 2 .7 Lotsz: 7,405 THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS SOURCED FROM PUBLIC DOCUMENTS AND IS NOT GUARANTEED Copyright (C) 1998 Acxiom Corporation Page 4 28 ) Prc1:632-361-011 Site:75712 EASY ST*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:NEWBY,RICAHRD W & VIC Mail:75712 EASY ST*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: Zn:CP Sale:$147, 000F Date:05/01/98 Loans:$144,590 Xmpt: Yb:1989 Sgft:1,418 Asd:$93, 956 Imp:74% Un:1 Doc#:172565 Tr: 21338-01 Lot: L-0011 Bdrms: 3 Bths: 1.7 Lotsz: 7,405 29 ) Prc1:632-361-012 Site:75706 EASY ST*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:BAKAL,RON & MARY Mail:75706 EASY ST*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: Zn:CP Sale:$15, 000P Date:03/12/97 Loans: Xmpt:Y Yb:1989 Sqft:2, 119 Asd:$239,700 Imp:72% Un:1 Doc#:82947 Tr: 21338-01 Lot: L-0012 Bdrms: 3 Bths: 2.7 Lotsz: 9,583 30 ) Prc1:632-361-016 Site:75685 DOLMAR CT*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:MCILROY,STEVE A & JEA Mail:75685 DOLMAR CT*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: Zn:CP Sale:$228, 000F Date:04/01/99 Loans:$216,600 Xmpt: Yb:1990 Sqft:2,119 Asd:$203,938 Imp:74% Un:1 Doc#:137814 Tr: 21338-01 Lot: L-0016 Bdrms: 3 Bths: 2 .7 Lotsz: 7,840 31 ) Prc1:632-361-017 Site:75699 DOLMAR CT*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:GROMAN,WILLIAM M & LI Mail:600 DOVER LN*CAMBRIA CA 93428 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: Zn:CP Sale:$225,000F Date:04/30/99 Loans:$180, 000 Xmpt: Yb:1990 Sqft:2,119 Asd:$256,417 Imp:75% Un:1 Doc#:184350 Tr: 21338-01 Lot: L-0017 Bdrms: 3 Bths: 2.7 Lotsz: 7,840 32 ) Prc1:632-361-022 Site:75730 DOLMAR CT*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:WEBB,TRACY & KIMBERLY Mail:75730 DOLMAR CT*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: (760) 340-1823 Zn:CP Sale:$163,000F Date:03/12/97 Loans:$125, 000 Xmpt:Y Yb:1990 Sqft:2, 119 Asd:$166,260 Imp:75% Un:1 Doc#:81910 Tr: 21338-01 Lot: L-0022 Bdrms: 3 Bths: 2.7 Lotsz: 6, 969 33 ) Prc1:632-361-031 Site:75746 DUVAL CT*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:WALKER TRUST Mail:45120 SAN PABLO AVE*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: (909) 337-9242 Zn:CP Sale:$182,500F Date:11/12/98 Loans:$100, 000 Xmpt: Yb:1990 Sqft:1,851 Asd:$160,221 Imp:74% Un:1 Doc#:490905 Tr: 21338-01 Lot: L-0031 Bdrms: 3 Bths: 1.7 Lotsz: 9, 583 34 ) Prc1:632-421-001 Site:41945 CARLOTTA DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:MACLEAN,MACTAGGART J Mail:41945 CARLOTTA DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: Zn:CP Sale:$195,000F Date:07/07/97 Loans:$175,305 Xmpt: Yb: Sqft: Asd:$195,000 Imp:79% Un:1 Doc#:238413 Tr: 25436-00 Lot: L-0001 Bdrms: Bths: Lotsz: 7,405 35 ) Prc1:632-421-002 I Site:41955 CARLOTTA DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:MORELAND,KAREN L Mail:41955 CARLOTTA DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: Zn:CP Sale:$195,000F Date:10/31/97 Loans: Xmpt:Y Yb: Sqft: Asd:$195, 000 Imp:79% Un:1 Doc#:397217 Tr: 25436-00 Lot: L-0002 Bdrms: Bths: Lotsz: 7,405 36 ) Prc1:632-421-004 Site:41960 FREEDOM CT*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:FLEMING,DANIEL W & JE Mail:41960 FREEDOM CT*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: Zn:CP Sale:$218,000F Date:02/22/99 Loans:$174,400 Xmpt: Yb:1993 Sqft:2,247 Asd:$177, 908 Imp:76% Un:1 Doc#:68254 Tr: 25436-00 Lot: L-0004 Bdrms: 3 Bths: 2.0 Lotsz: 7,840 THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS SOURCED FROM PUBLIC DOCUMENTS AND IS NOT GUARANTEED Copyright (C) 1998 Acxiom Corporation Page 5 "37 ) Prc1:632-421-005 Site:41950 FREEDOM CT*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:SCHULZE,KRIS R & CHER Mai1:41950 FREEDOM CT*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: Zn:CP Sale:$183, 000F Date:12/31/97 Loans:$173,850 Xmpt:Y Yb: Sqft: Asd:$183,000 Imp:78% Un:1 Doc#:479718 Tr: 25436-00 Lot: L-0005 Bdrms: Bths: Lotsz: 7,405 38 ) Prc1:632-421-007 Site:41945 FREEDOM CT*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:ANDERSEN,LEIF & ANNET Mail:41945 FREEDOM CT*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: Zn:CP Sale:$220, 000F Date:10/30/98 Loans:$219,900 Xmpt: Yb:1993 Sqft:2,562 Asd:$210,000 Imp:76% Un:1 Doc#:470088 Tr: 25436-00 Lot: L-0007 Bdrms: 4 Bths: 2.7 Lotsz: 7,840 39 ) Prc1:632-421-008 Site:41955 FREEDOM CT*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:NEDER,AMANDA Mail:41955 FREEDOM CT*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: Zn:CP Sale:$208,000F Date:09/13/96 Loans: Xmpt: Yb: Sqft: Asd:$212, 160 Imp:80% Un:1 Doc#:347626 Tr: 25436-00 Lot: L-0008 Bdrms: Bths: Lotsz: 7,405 40 ) Prc1:632-421-009 Site:41965 FREEDOM CT*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:MOSS,SCOTT J ETAL Mail:41965 FREEDOM CT*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: (760) 779-9959 Zn:CP Sale:$210,000F Date:03/12/97 Loans:$199,500 Xmpt: Yb: Sqft: Asd:$214,200 Imp:71% Un:1 Doc#:82999 Tr: 25436-00 Lot: L-0009 Bdrms: Bths: Lotsz: 7,840 41 ) Prc1:632-421-015 Site:41965 MAYRN CT*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:CALDWELL,DAVID E Mai1:41965 MAYRN CT*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: Zn:CP Sale:$225,000F Date:03/27/98 Loans:$180, 000 Xmpt: Yb:1992 Sgft:3,280 Asd:$260, 100 Imp:80% Un:1 Doc#:114467 Tr: 25436-00 Lot: L-0015 Bdrms: 4 Bths: 3 .0 Lotsz: 7,840 42 ) Prc1:632-421-017 Site:41950 HEMINGWAY CT*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:CARTWRIGHT,WILLIAM M Mail:41950 HEMINGWAY CT*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: Zn:CP Sale:$274, 000 Date:09/04/98 Loans:$274, 000 Xmpt: Yb:1992 Sgft:3,100 Asd:$187,258 Imp:68% Un:1 Doc#:379238 Tr: 25436-00 Lot: L-0017 Bdrms: 4 Bths: 3.0 Lotsz: 7,840 43 ) Prc1:632-421-019 Site:41945 HEMINGWAY CT*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:THOMAS,ROBERT F Mail:1740 E GARRY AVE 101*SANTA ANA CA 92705 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: Zn:CP Sale:$239, 000 Date:04/20/98 Loans: Xmpt: Yb:1992 Sqft:2,562 Asd:$240,000 Imp:70% Un:1 Doc#:150969 Tr: 25436-00 Lot: L-0019 Bdrms: 4 Bths: 2 .7 Lotsz: 7,405 44 ) Prc1:632-421-023 ° Site:41985 HEMINGWAY CT*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:GERHARDT,MATHEW & SHE Mail:41985 HEMINGWAY CT*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: Zn:CP Sale:$210,000 Date:07/01/97 Loans:$190,800 Xmpt: Yb:1992 Sgft:3, 100 Asd:$210, 000 Imp:76% Un:1 Doc#:233016 Tr: 25436-00 Lot: L-0023 Bdrms: 4 Bths: 3 .0 Lotsz: 7,840 45 ) Prc1:632-421-024 Site:41995 HEMINGWAY CT*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:MILLHAUSER,JOHN & VEL Mail:41995 HEMINGWAY CT*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: Zn:CP Sale:$179,000F Date:06/26/98 Loans:$143,200 Xmpt: Yb:1992 Sqft:2,247 Asd:$210, 000 Imp:71% Un:1 Doc#:262789 Tr: 25436-00 Lot: L-0024 Bdrms: 3 Bths: 2.0 Lotsz: 8,276 THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS SOURCED FROM PUBLIC DOCUMENTS AND IS NOT GUARANTEED Copyright (C) 1998 Acxiom Corporation Page 6 - 46 ) Prc1:632-422-001 Site:75525 DEMPSEY DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:NAKASHIMA,RUTH ETAL Mai1:75525 DEMPSEY DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: (760) 568-3216 Zn:CP Sale:$174, 000 Date:10/04/96 Loans:$130,500 Xmpt : Yb:1992 Sqft:2,247 Asd:$177,480 Imp:77% Un:1 Doc#:383293 Tr: 25436-00 Lot: L-0025 Bdrms: 3 Bths: 2.0 Lotsz: 7,840 47 ) Prc1:632-422-008 Site:75595 DEMPSEY DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:LISTERMANN,BRAD Mai1:75595 DEMPSEY DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: Zn:CP Sale:$255,000F Date:06/09/99 Loans:$216,750 Xmpt: Yb:1992 Sqft:2,562 Asd:$218,280 Imp:719s Un:1 Doc#:255235 Tr: 25436-00 Lot: L-0032 Bdrms: 4 Bths: 2.7 Lotsz: 7,405 48 ) Prc1:632-422-009 Site:75605 DEMPSEY DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:LANDER,ELLIOT B & MAR Mail:75605 DEMPSEY DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: Zn:CP Sale:$229, 000F Date:04/02/98 Loans:$218,400 Xmpt: Yb:1992 Sgft:3, 100 Asd:$275,000 Imp:7495- Un:1 Doc#:126934 Tr: 25436-00 Lot: L-0033 Bdrms: 4 Bths: 3.0 Lotsz: 7,405 49 ) Prc1:632-422-010 Site:75615 DEMPSEY DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:MILLOT,VALERIE & ERIC Mail:75615 DEMPSEY DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: Zn:CP Sale:$187, 000F Date:12/24/98 Loans:$140,250 Xmpt: Yb:1993 Sqft:2,247 Asd:$198,196 Imp:79% Un:1 Doc#:558920 Tr: 25436-00 Lot: L-0034 Bdrms: 3 Bths: 2.0 Lotsz: 7,405 50 ) Prc1:632-422-011 Site:75625 DEMPSEY DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr: ' ,CASTELLANOS TRUST Mail:PO BOX 14030*PALM DESERT CA 92255 Use:VAC RESIDENTIAL Ph: Zn:CP Sale:$50, 000F Date:07/30/99 Loans: Xmpt: Yb: Sqft: Asd:$35, 373 Imp:0% Un: Doc#:341207 Tr: 25436-00 Lot: L-0035 Bdrms: Bths: Lotsz: 7,405 51 ) Prc1:632-480-004 Site:370 TAVA LN*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:ZIEGLER,DAVID Mail:325 HARTFORD RD*DANVILLE CA 94526 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn: Sale:$94,000F Date:08/02/99 Loans:$75,200 Xmpt: Yb:1992 Sqft:991 Asd:$93,531 Imp:779s Un:1 Doc#:345139 Tr: 19847-03 Lot: L-0004 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 2.0 Lotsz: 1,742 52 ) Prc1:632-480-012 Site:386 TAVA LN*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:LEVIN,DEBORAH R Mail:4457 MOORPARK WAY*NORTH HOLLYWOOD CA 91602 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn: Sale:$83,000F Date:07/07/98 Loans: Xmpt: Yb:1992 Sqft:991 Asd:$86,700 Imp:769s Un:1 Doc#:278434 Tr: 19847-03 Lot: L-0012 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 2.0 Lotsz: 1,742 53 ) Prc1:632-480-013 ` Site:388 TAVA LN*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:WILTON,JOHN T & IRENE Mai1:9250 CARITA RD*SANTEE CA 92071 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: (619)448-3258 Zn: Sale:$80, 000F Date:12/20/96 Loans:$60, 000 Xmpt: Yb:1992 Sqft:991 Asd:$81,600 Imp:759s Un:1 Doc#:478507 Tr: 19847-03 Lot: L-0013 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 2.0 Lotsz: 1,742 54 ) Prc1:632-480-016 Site:394 TAVA LN*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:BYRNE,JULIE H Mail:394 TAVA LN*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn: Sale:$88,000F Date:06/17/99 Loans:$75, 000 Xmpt : Yb:1992 Sqft:991 Asd:$86,353 Imp:75% Un:1 Doc#:267841 Tr: 19847-03 Lot: L-0016 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 2.0 Lotsz: 1,742 THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS SOURCED FROM PUBLIC DOCUMENTS AND IS NOT GUARANTEED Copyright (C) 1998 Acxiom Corporation Page 7 55 ) Prc1:632-480-017 Site:396 TAVA LN*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Ownr:ANSELMO,MICHELLE R Mail:396 TAVA LN*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn: Sale:$98,000F Date:05/27/99 Loans:$97,000 Xmpt: Yb:1994 Sqft:991 Asd:$94,673 Imp:77% Un:1 Doc#:232447 Tr: 19847-03 Lot: L-0017 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 2 .0 Lotsz: 1,742 56 ) Prc1:684-033-004 Site:40230 CLUB VIEW DR*RANCHO MIRAGE CA 92270 Ownr:SARA,RICHARD A Mail:40230 CLUB VIEW DR*RANCHO MIRAGE CA 92270 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: Zn:R1 Sale:$395,000F Date:09/13/96 Loans:$276, 000 Xmpt:Y Yb:1963 Sgft:5, 016 Asd:$402, 900 Imp:78% Un:1 Doc#:347994 Tr: 00000-00 Lot: L-0016 Bdrms: 4 Bths: 3.7 Lotsz: 27,442 57 ) Prc1:684-034-008 Site:40267 CLUB VIEW DR*RANCHO MIRAGE CA 92270 Ownr:MCKAY,RICHARD & KATHL Mail:27532 ELMBRIDGE DR*RANCHO PALOS VERDES 90275 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: Zn:R1 Sale: Date:06/01/97 Loans: Xmpt: Yb: Sqft: Asd:$185,698 Imp:53% Un:1 Doc#:199347 Tr: 00000-00 Lot: L-0009 Bdrms: Bths: Lotsz: 58 ) Prc1:684-040-006 Site:71382 CYPRESS DR*RANCHO MIRAGE CA 92270 Ownr:ENGER,JERRY & GLORIA Mail:15729 W MAPLE DR*GOLDEN CO 80401 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: (303) 277-0590 Zn:Rl Sale:$325, 000F Date:12/31/98 Loans:$244, 017 Xmpt: Yb: Sqft: Asd:$350,000 Imp:64% Un:1 Doc#:571910 Tr: 00000-00 Lot: L-0005 Bdrms: Bths: Lotsz: 59 ) Prc1:684-040-010 Site:71361 CYPRESS DR*RANCHO MIRAGE CA 92270 Ownr:BORNS,ROBERT A Mail:515 ROUND HILL RD*INDIANAPOLIS IN 46260 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: Zn:Rl Sale:$440, 000F Date:03/05/97 Loans: Xmpt: Yb:1954 Sqft:4,448 Asd:$448,800 Imp:77% Un:1 Doc#:74605 Tr: 00000-00 Lot: L-0009 Bdrms: 5 Bths: 3.2 Lotsz: 24,393 60 ) Prc1:684-050-008 Site:40555 SAND DUNE RD*RANCHO MIRAGE CA 92270 Ownr:LEGVOLD,PAUL A Mail:40555 SAND DUNE RD*RANCHO MIRAGE CA 92270 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: Zn:ES Sale:$1,600, 000F Date:04/07/99 Loans:$1,200,000 Xmpt: Yb:1958 Sqft:5, 961 Asd:$434, 983 Imp:83% Un:1 Doc#:147586 Tr: 00000-00 Lot: P-0001 Bdrms: 6 Bths: 4.7 Lotsz: 3 .00 A 61 ) Prc1:684-060-006 Site:40990 PAXTON DR 26*RANCHO MIRAGE CA 92270 Ownr:MATTHEWS TRUST Mail:1106 N CITRUS AVE*COVINA CA 91722 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: Zn:Rl Sale:$151,000F Date:07/14/98 Loans:$120,640 Xmpt: Yb: Sqft: Asd:$110,535 Imp:80% Un:1 Doc#:289347 Tr: 02957-00 Lot: L-0006 Bdrms: Bths: Lotsz: 5,662 62 ) Prc1:684-060-007 ` Site:40990 PAXTON DR 27*RANCHO MIRAGE CA 92270 Ownr:SOWARDS,NORMAN & MARY Mail:1719 FINCH RD*HAYDEN ID 83835 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: Zn:Rl Sale:$165, 000F Date:04/02/99 Loans: Xmpt: Yb: Sqft: Asd:$108,324 Imp:83% Un:1 Doc#:141834 Tr: 02957-00 Lot: L-0007 Bdrms: Bths: Lotsz: 5,662 63 ) Prc1:684-060-008 Site:40990 PAXTON DR 28*RANCHO MIRAGE CA 92270 Ownr:RICHARDS,JOHN M & JOY Mail:10200 GIBSON RD*SEATTLE WA 98145 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: Zn:Rl Sale:$350,000F Date:12/31/98 Loans: Xmpt: Yb: Sqft: Asd:$202,245 Imp:78% Un:1 Doc#:571111 Tr: 02957-00 Lot: L-0008 Bdrms: Bths: Lotsz: 5,662 THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS SOURCED FROM PUBLIC DOCUMENTS AND IS NOT GUARANTEED Copyright (C) 1998 Acxiom Corporation 53° Page 8 '64 ) Prc1:684-071-017 Site:71150 N THUNDERBIRD TER*RANCHO MIRAGE C 92270 Ownr:RUSSO,B R & LINDA Mail:71150 N THUNDERBIRD TER*RANCHO MIRAGE C 92270 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: Zn:SF Sale:$1, 175, 000F Date:02/06/98 Loans:$881,250 Xmpt: Yb:1986 Sqft:6,251 Asd:$1,237,809 Imp:78% Un:1 Doc#:44840 Tr: 02266-00 Lot: L-0004 Bdrms: 4 Bths: 4.0 Lotsz: 65 ) Prc1:684-071-020 Site:71070 N THUNDERBIRD TER*RANCHO MIRAGE C 92270 Ownr:ROUZIE,MARY J Mail:71070 N THUNDERBIRD TER*RANCHO MIRAGE C 92270 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: Zn:ES Sale:$860,000F Date:09/02/98 Loans:$599, 000 Xmpt: Yb: Sqft: Asd:$578,445 Imp:65% Un:1 Doc#:374120 Tr: 02266-00 Lot: L-0007 Bdrms: Bths: Lotsz: 66 ) Prc1:684-071-025 Site:71175 W THUNDERBIRD TER*RANCHO MIRAGE C 92270 Ownr:LOHRER,DALE Mail:8454 HOLLYWOOD BLVD*WEST HOLLYWOOD CA 90069 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: Zn:ES Sale:$650,500F Date:03/05/98 Loans:$503,750 Xmpt: Yb:1982 Sqft:4,715 Asd:$775,000 Imp:80% Un:1 Doc#:79936 Tr: 02266-00 Lot: L-0012 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 4.5 Lotsz: 19, 166 67 ) Prc1:684-071-029 Site:71170 N THUNDERBIRD TER*RANCHO MIRAGE C 92270 Ownr:WIESMANN,MICHAEL J & Mail:71170 N THUNDERBIRD TER*RANCHO MIRAGE C 92270 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: Zn:A2 Sale:$975, 000F Date:02/19/98 Loans:$780,000 Xmpt: Yb:1991 Sqft:5,561 Asd:$1,180,737 Imp:60% Un:1 Doc#:58276 Tr: 02266-00 Lot: L-0003 Bdrms: 4 Bths: 5.0 Lotsz: 24,829 68 ) Prc1:684-072-010 Site:71170 W THUNDERBIRD TER*RANCHO MIRAGE C 92270 Ownr:GLADCAT INV LTD Mail:1651 W BURNSIDE RD*RANCHO MIRAGE CA 92270 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: Zn:ES Sale:$600,000F Date:12/17/96 Loans: Xmpt: Yb: Sqft: Asd:$612,000 Imp:70% Un:1 Doc#:473569 Tr: 02266-00 Lot: L-0027 Bdrms: Bths: Lotsz: 69 ) Prc1:684-081-007 Site:71280 N THUNDERBIRD TER*RANCHO MIRAGE C 92270 Ownr:DE ROSA,ETTORE R & MA Mail:2 CREEKSIDE DR*RANCHO MIRAGE CA 92270 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: (760) 324-8009 Zn:ES Sale:$1,200,000F Date:01/28/98+ Loans:$800, 000 Xmpt: Yb:1984 Sqft:6, 112 Asd:$969,034 Imp:77% Un:1 Doc#:29025 Tr: - Lot: - Bdrms: 3 Bths: 3 .0 Lotsz: 43,560 70 ) Prc1:684-082-009 Site:40505 PAXTON DR*RANCHO MIRAGE CA 92270 Ownr:SAMUELS,RONALD I Mail:1 MISSION CT*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: Zn:ES Sale:$930, 000F Date:06/05/98 Loans:$800, 000 Xmpt: Yb:1979 Sqft:3,546 Asd:$350,000 Imp:71% Un:1 Doc#:231911 Tr: 02266-00 Lot: L-0020 Bdrms: 4 Bths: 3.2 Lotsz: 16,988 71 ) Prc1:684-083-010 ` Site:40500 PAXTON DR*RANCHO MIRAGE CA 92270 Ownr:MEIER,CAROL A Mail:1133 WABIN*MADISON WI 53711 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: Zn:ES Sale:$550, 000F Date:06/25/99 Loans: Xmpt: Yb:1981 Sqft:3,712 Asd:$437,009 Imp:74% Un:1 Doc#:286077 Tr: 02266-00 Lot: L-0036 Bdrms: 4 Bths: 4.2 Lotsz: 18,295 72 ) Prc1:684-531-035 Site:68 LA CERRA DR*RANCHO MIRAGE CA 92270 Ownr:BROOKOVER TRUST Mail:4704 HILLCREST VIEW DR*BOISE ID 83705 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn:PU Sale:$137,000F Date:05/01/98 Loans:$150,000 Xmpt: Yb:1975 Sgft:1,320 Asd:$115,000 Imp:73% Un:1 Doc#:173260 Tr: 05031-00 Lot: U-0243 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 1.7 Lotsz: 1,742 THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS SOURCED FROM PUBLIC DOCUMENTS AND IS NOT GUARANTEED Copyright (C) 1998 Acxiom Corporation Page 9 '73 ) Prc1:684-541-044 Site:149 LA CERRA DR*RANCHO MIRAGE CA 92270 Ownr:GEORGE,JOHN C & ARLEN Mail:149 LA CERRA DR*RANCHO MIRAGE CA 92270 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: (909) 981-3052 Zn:PU Sale:$141, 000F Date:06/30/97 Loans:$100, 000 Xmpt:Y Yb:1975 Sgft:1,581 Asd:$143,820 Imp:78% Un:1 Doc#:231432 Tr: 05031-00 Lot: U-0324 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 1.7 Lotsz: 1,742 74 ) Prc1:684-541-047 Site:152 LA CERRA DR*RANCHO MIRAGE CA 92270 Ownr:BOOTHE,PAUL W & MARJO Mail:11023 SE 24TH PL*BELLEVUE WA 98004 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: (425) 455-4848 Zn:PU Sale:$104, 000F Date:07/01/98 Loans:$102, 000 Xmpt: Yb:1975 Sgft:1,320 Asd:$115, 000 Imp:73% Un:1 Doc#:272258 Tr: 05031-00 Lot: U-0327 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 1.7 Lotsz: 1,306 75 ) Prc1:684-541-048 Site:153 LA CERRA DR*RANCHO MIRAGE CA 92270 Ownr:DAWSON,GERALDINE G Mail:153 LA CERRA DR*RANCHO MIRAGE CA 92270 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn:PU Sale:$154,500F Date:07/29/99 Loans: Xmpt: Yb:1975 Sqft:1,581 Asd:$72,743 Imp:77% Un:1 Doc#:339514 Tr: 05031-00 Lot: U-0328 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 1.7 Lotsz: 1,742 76 ) Prc1:684-541-050 Site:155 LA CERRA DR*RANCHO MIRAGE CA 92270 Ownr:KELLER,ROBERT L & BET Mail:4941 OAKWOOD AVE*LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE C 91011 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: (818) 790-5101 Zn:PU Sale:$112,000F Date:04/01/97 Loans: Xmpt: Yb:1975 Sgft:1,320 Asd:$114,240 Imp:73% Un:1 Doc#:108119 Tr: 05031-00 Lot: U-0330 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 1.7 Lotsz: 1,306 77 ) Prc1:684-541-051 Site:156 LA CERRA DR*RANCHO MIRAGE CA 92270 Ownr:GRAYBOFF, IRA & MARILY Mail:156 LA CERRA DR*RANCHO MIRAGE CA 92270 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: (760) 770-9767 Zn:PU Sale:$112,000F Date:10/30/96 Loans: Xmpt:Y Yb:1975 Sgft:1,320 Asd:$114,240 Imp:73% Un:1 Doc#:416154 Tr: 05031-00 Lot: U-0331 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 1.7 Lotsz: 1,306 78 ) Prc1:684-551-002 Site:159 LA CERRA DR*RANCHO MIRAGE CA 92270 Ownr:CAMERON,PAUL & PATRIC Mail:159 LA CERRA DR*RANCHO MIRAGE CA 92270 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn:PU Sale:$68, 000F Date:06/30/99 Loans:$54,400 Xmpt: Yb:1975 Sqft:854 Asd:$65, 000 Imp:69% Un:1 Doc#:293239 Tr: 05031-00 Lot: U-0334 Bdrms: 1 Bths: 1.5 Lotsz: 1,742 79 ) Prc1:684-551-003 Site:160 LA CERRA DR*RANCHO MIRAGE CA 92270 Ownr:LIPMAN,CLAIRE Mail:160 LA CERRA DR*RANCHO MIRAGE CA 92270 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn:PU Sale:$67, 000F Date:06/30/97 Loans:$67,500 Xmpt:Y Yb:1975 Sgft:854 Asd:$62,220 Imp:67% Un:1 Doc#:231007 Tr: 05031-00 Lot: U-0335 Bdrms: 1 Bths: 1.5 Lotsz: 1,742 80 ) Prc1:690-120-006 ° Site:40990 PAXTON DR 17*RANCHO MIRAGE CA 92270 Ownr:QVALE,BJARNE & HOPE Mail:4067 LADERA VISTA RD*FALLBROOK CA 92028 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn:AO Sale:$212,500P Date:06/01/97 Loans: Xmpt: Yb:1957 Sqft:1,446 Asd:$138,833 Imp:0% Un:1 Doc#:214721 Tr: - Lot: - Bdrms: 1 Bths: 2.0 Lotsz: 4 .00 A THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS SOURCED FROM PUBLIC DOCUMENTS AND IS NOT GUARANTEED Copyright (C) 1998 Acxiom Corporation COMMONWEALTH TITLE COMPANY 72-855 Fred Warn ve, Suite A5 I Palm Desert,CA 92260 760-836-3726 I fax/60-341-3215 Commonwealth September 17, 1999 RECEIVED To: City Council Members SEP 2 0 1999 City of Palm Desert 73510 Fred Waring Drive COMMUNITYCEVELOPMENTDEPARTMENT Cf1Y OF PALM DESERT Palm Desert, Ca 92260 Re: Paseo Village, a proposed Continuing Care Retirement Community Fred Waring Drive at Fairhaven Drive Dear City Council Members: In researching the surrounding properties of the Hacienda de Monterey Retirement Center, it is my opinion the property values have not diminished due to their location. The attached property comparables have been comprised from the public documents obtained at the Riverside County Recorder's Office. Activity and prices are both on the rise and competitive in the current Real Estate market. in- ere y, atty ek'ch, Business Development Representative PK/abm att: ' 62/n�//�725-8-4 _� _06 TCA RPM ENS YIP /S FOR ' thoz / R SI/2 NW//4 SEC 20, T5S, R.6E • ON-079 ASSESSYEN7 PURPOSES afar 018-/55 41/4(!Oe) vkan.,-cav- -. 0/8-/56 It i�u'I S S 'fl"IA'Dar e..s✓4 w✓4 a.r w w e,. Carl wU*a..r O3 [ • r n•.a'• fOs..0 /38.f7 IOe wow/a •••• t Ex. ©/ ,� J• � a 26Ie 0./7lcs • Po:�1 0 tiPt2 / .p0' �T /� ® ® b : b /.76Ae I. 2. 1L 7 • alul.r �' ' h o L _ i fSal >:at,r w . .. r 1.? o g lie ' : ti 06� rmA - ars-/55 /�{��A 4 &o F M s. ! N ,PAY.-7 :W C Z.4, ®z/'. to ht-e-zirP, ; a l s(2r al)s•ar.f @ MI ON IL0 0.Z ® ���fff V 20 ® ® ® ® W` ®• ® 0 O 1 c •' - Ni- • 29 Jn ‘ QV n 39 3. O SAN ANTON/O SAN REMENTE ACT MINA...,,. C/R2E ..JR r L7RCLE L-,:7---- : (---- „...1,4-.- 40 4 6;---;-:a iLw 2.5r.MN..olit PAY 011114 ICU / 6 � Oa© 36 •.i .sr • Aar as -aI .J I c= n/Is or 11 r;sJ .• d O9 ® e • N©062O/7" .• Z 13 O ® aS + 32 ©31 S N ®a - OV•.Ir IS araa v as .i.ear as .. .v as i 6 ®• O 4 ®s O Z r a. 42 ®; a. a. _ // 7 1 a. a. ki. /1 O�O le F a. a N ®�4 n a. .. : 33 j 4 3I y ...OP ..R trar iN .... '% • r• ..r S�r ' ..v w. y �. • } r� II: f . 4/V- (burr f N10 I w as I c✓ r + *MY - 1 r i 1 1 I 1 I i I i r ME 2///6-18 Palma Village unit no.7 ado:R/S 25/22 0R.AI.159//5-/6 Parcel Mop Na 2/895 ASSESSORS Ai4P BK.627 P,ri.06 R/VERSOE COUNTY. CAI IF t..f.. Lsa 3/111r int" 'LIM 0.7 3p'tM3A10 10•9W In:WI SPW S MaS 3S5V SINSOZ vN doff MAI a rr/Nil 6/ I/ • 96//z 97Y ♦a i IMP v..?ref MEN Mir w Lou I ' edgy A 'WAY 9/-9///l 97Y /// A77/H .71 VIJ N loll ,or M• I — ; N't•N ,_P.4 M♦4 . .T/lot if f —^1ra41 aravr •,h ; Jt i tr t.... eN 4 A �•+ ♦,•„ II/IVY ^•i .I.,,, r'�1 ; M tt7ri'�M/l N• M �.. .... ..s.wa►.si f ... �y t i I v SSW riwd•N-, wawa . 2 , NI w I I ' I I r Y e •• w K ill rs�•e/• ♦ r I i / is/ : is ar ' rri : i : 1 ? r.ad •. �' h-•`1 Y-"•1 ,IrK {{ es/ r L;, sr/ : �' e+y'o ' »ird� 'F - p •..,I a-,,, ar, F siu'0 a ��T� a. F =t ...i .4 1. Vl _ .. ` I/ell +— � �i/1 A•Y��i 410 MP u.^rA ••H A377t' �' ... • .•t /10 .077V �_ +iwl wri01 Jeri is %a 0 © ® © 0 ® 0 @ zi O ;i F/, !/ . 9O 9/ 9►i �LOI\% /to s0, sa • ' in Z __ x/ izi K/ 0/ ..,r. 1o' : a tf/ • 9f/ O , O 7 ) Z \ w 4 iM .. i Lf/ S t►I f r►r0.. • \ ., I tr ` • 370&/0 3701110 2 1., O ..... `i ♦� 31N3Y1370 ND'S . �i/••' O/NOMV ND'S O r H Gil ® LI = -' O` er Id/ :. MI 9/3j • 0/7 O EO tI/ RI O O SS/ = O OfI ' TT ih ' , .Z. sT . ' �• 11 ,•Ir •Q to : II/O £100,,, oz, 0 B/ cz, • $z/0 zL0Orf/ = E so 0 :Qi z►/ : ^: r• n m rr. .r.. J O O 1 = • ® . 6l w w Oil O rO �,/ K. ! 0 :O/ .e ..t ,DOI• / � • O • ♦OY w w 71 f• or rat /zi ddI •( ON IN 1� 425 w. lam. _.Ir T. I.. .�/• . I.. P. • . H 4— - r491M. t { 1 I I _N a:vv )01i.t. 1 ..1 :. • 90 ... _ 39 V `S 91 '00;27S //MN 0//S 80d oo e10 z 'del LO-209 r-B-SZ 627-0 r.C.A. v/s-one ,.3 2s-e-rr 0/8-024 POR. N//2 NE//4 SEC 20, T. 5S, R. 6 E, f-, 018-/42 018-/56 0/8-/84 O/8-/93 4't 3b�5t4/1 Qr.gpV AcvG. 11 /. 4j N at.`f'Q J/O.eG b+•�a ..88 ROARS. �x .a• P.KI Aas.fa m-• R.N.Mi ,I.sre e_,,, 0 ,ie Y I Or a 0.2/•t AC ; 0.2/t AC P. TRA 0/e-/36 IA O7 j ' © ''" 5...):,1 :® so se % au7 ..e. e!� po �. �.a b e.• O �.,.. • Pot'i 3A i 1RA3 CP q : ' ®� - r+..s a.+ `^® w L'r0.A6t O.J/As O.Isla 4 /6 p O ~ O./6t Ac y_�\' to !B r mow%-SIr , J V /.s�t O .1� \ cu`«Y4'I fr-I %.r.it 11 3 A C.. g0 2A o 2 // .'.. /S !B :$® . reA © `� • n Po,2 3 ' 0/8tAc 0/8. Ac 77,r7 ti O /© Y o w® /® ED0/7fAcy O./7f� o.ao'k /A / �a `(q.:�J Z e k �fRAO/I•/fl - w� 4 or or ct L\•- (....01.) ,lr..L- .w.ui its.., * .,.. I I .on is c ,..H ,..... •,.,r OP. r\%!rr.,.e1 h P v.G. 4075s.s/I BK. // scG , CATALINA y l.•44'e L S T WAY 1 625 y L.f a �`CF�� {rV{r�� � M , LOT A Y N+. H+1 w+, f4+n Ita. L r 'lG..1" .ar 1..14"4.1. T 5 /"/ i. /00.// w - r,' �'rlf' .L 11 I � LLL 4 !. � �13 is'/' � Olsr otor �4a .. st zs �' `ww 'e a.%� 7•, o.s-,lr 1p o Lefts nrwc.u-..i sa Af ; Ta. a/1.184 A PAOR./ • e(J ; R/71 .30 aas4. O Z 8 r/7l 11.11 rK 6 / °.� 2 :t 3 y # £ 3 , , 7 r O.29jAC.NI rill#s�Jf..b if Z O O O M r, • rin 0m-a 40" 0 0 3 0 O 1 ^ O 3 /wl�n i�n w,-a� ! _ .l7.s. /41.Ca di-47 `j O2 /is./s `. • ;O 7 nslT .i..i �11. IRA/82I v., /Jr-/ L,"r.#' /'� PAR I O.�i A8 O •• .sv-r\�s,rat ICE) - /4 y Jin It 4O O /34 O gkf) a '� /73-a !Fs. O.Q.4-t.4t.y _ O. Act /7..•1 w., /n-,t.,rst t a.— .. ... 3 O 1 0.2/�AC /35 •• ,a*-I 7,Fst 141 a/00 ,J4-s a-/o 6 ® I 7 !/ . O5 O u ,,,..r o O� O Wes /s/-ro ♦s.sr d PARS 0 . s• a• /J/-r/-K.sT M ar ® a! I.s 1 ; : O 0 / e • /li-tz 41-st ti , 0.2/ AG • /J/-rl 44.sf -4.-• /fa to I 4•.a, a... `sa we= 4 JG•' „,.,G o-ar;/1 P.gf r1/1� Is ,2Is7 /al..I P /J/-N lo,Sr 4 • /3/-ls J/sr • /s/-Ji sr,ar MB. 20/5/ Po/mo Vi//ogle Groves PM78/98 99 Parcel Mop /4/63 /a/u kVA! al-/r • ur-.r W./l,If M.B. 25/85 Sun Grove /6 R.S 20/76 Record of Survey PM. 8/6 Traci Na 4832 Do/a , RS.20/55 ASSESSORS MAP SK.627 P6./3 R/VERS/D£ COUNTY, CAL/F. t/NE/967 vw . Prope Profile - Riverside LANDAMERICA Prepared For: Acnt Rep: Attention C/S Rep: ****************************************************************************** * * * APN : 627-092-013 Phone : (307) 672-8182 * * Ownerl: CLARKE,JANIS P OwnShp: * * Owner2: Pg-Grd: 213-B1/848-E1 * * Site : 44790 SAN BENITO CIR Census: 0451.022 * * : PALM DESERT CA 92260 Zoning: R1 * * Mail : 61 EAST LN Tract : 00000-00 * * : SHERIDAN WY 82801 Lot/B1: L-0085/ * * Legal : LOT 85 MB 021/016 PALMA VILLAGE UNIT 7 * * FloodP: 060629 0003 * * * * * * Property Characteristics * * * * * * Use : SINGLE RESIDENCE * * Yr Blt: 1949 SqFeet: 1, 194 GarSqF: 576 * * BedBth: 2/1.0 Addtnl: GarTyp: DETACHED * * #Story: 1 Roof : ROLL COMP CarSqF: * * #Units: 1 Ht/C1 : GarTy2: * * Lotsz : 7,840 FirePl: Y Outlmp: * * Gas : DEVELOPED Pool StSurf: YES * * Sewer : DEVELOPED View MscBdg: * * Electr: DEVELOPED * * Water : DEVELOPED * * * * * * Sale/Loan Information * * * * * * Last Trans W/O $: * * SaleDt: 07/16/98 Doc# : 293675 Buyer : CLARKE,JANIS P * * SaleAm: $90, 000 F $/SqFt: $75.38 Seller: SMITH,JOEL C & R * * 1st Td: $40, 000 LoanTy: /FIX/ Lender: CHASE MANHTN MTG * * +Addl: PrevDt: Title : STEWART TITLE * * PrevAm: * * * * * * Assessment/Tax Information * * * * Assd : $62,500 Tax : $1,198 .46 * * Land : $18,750 Status: CUR * * Improv: $43,750 TRA : 018193 * * perc: 709,5 Exempt: * * TaxYr : 98-99 * * * ****************************************************************************** THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS SOURCED FROM PUBLIC DOCUMENTS AND IS NOT GUARANTEED Copyright (C) 1998 Acxiom Corporation • Prope Profile - Riverside LANDAMERICA Prepared For: Acnt Rep: Attention C/S Rep: ****************************************************************************** * * * APN : 627-091-006 Phone : (503) 392-5803 * * Ownerl: COOPER TRUST OwnShp: * * Owner2: Pg-Grd: 213-B1/848-E1 * * Site : 44787 SAN BENITO CIR Census: 0451.022 * * : PALM DESERT CA 92260 Zoning: R1 * * Mail : 9404 SE SUNCREST DR Tract : 00000-00 * * : PORTLAND OR 97266 Lot/B1: L-0093/ * * Legal : LOT 93 MB 021/016 PALMA VILLAGE UNIT 7 * * FloodP: 060629 0003 * * * * * * Property Characteristics * * * * * * Use : SINGLE RESIDENCE * * Yr Blt: 1992 SqFeet: 1,475 GarSqF: 420 * * BedBth: 3/1.7 Addtnl: GarTyp: ATTACHED * * #Story: 1 Roof : TILE CarSqF: 576 * * #Units: 1 Ht/C1 : B GarTy2: * * Lotsz : 7,840 FirePl: Y OutImp: * * Gas : DEVELOPED Pool : Y StSurf: YES * * Sewer : DEVELOPED View : MscBdg: * * Electr: DEVELOPED * * Water : DEVELOPED * * * * * * Sale/Loan Information * * * * * * Last Trans W/O $: * * SaleDt: 03/15/99 Doc# : 103831 Buyer : COOPER TRUST * * SaleAm: $145, 000 F $/SqFt: $98 .31 Seller: GRENINGER TRUST * * 1st Td: LoanTy: Lender: * * +Addl: PrevDt: 08/02/95 Title : ORANGE COAST TIT * * PrevAm: * * * * * * Assessment/Tax Information * * * * Assd : $72,780 Tax : $1,263 .54 * * Land : $19,571 Status: CUR * * Improv: $53,209 TRA : 018234 * * perc: 73% Exempt: * * TaxYr : 98-99 * * * ****************************************************************************** THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS SOURCED FROM PUBLIC DOCUMENTS AND IS NOT GUARANTEED Copyright (C) 1998 Acxiom Corporation ap'Q • Prope Profile - Riverside LANDAMERICA Prepared For: Acnt Rep: Attention C/S Rep: ****************************************************************************** * * * APN : 627-083-003 Phone : * * Ownerl: DEAN,RONALD G OwnShp: SGLE MAN * * Owner2: Pg-Grd: 213-B1/848-E1 * * Site : 73304 SAN GORGONIO WAY Census: 0451.022 * * : PALM DESERT CA 92260 Zoning: R1 * * Mail : 73304 SAN GORGONIO WAY Tract : 00000-00 * * : PALM DESERT CA 92260 Lot/B1: L-0051/ * * Legal : LOT 51 MB 021/016 PALMA VILLAGE UNIT 7 * * FloodP: 060629 0003 * * * * * * Property Characteristics * * * * * * Use : SINGLE RESIDENCE * * Yr Blt: 1948 SqFeet: 1,150 GarSqF: * * BedBth: 2/1.0 Addtnl: GarTyp: * * #Story: 1 Roof : ROLL COMP CarSqF: * * #Units: 1 Ht/C1 : GarTy2: * * Lotsz : 7,840 FirePl: Y OutImp: * * Gas : DEVELOPED Pool StSurf: YES * * Sewer : DEVELOPED View MscBdg: * * Electr: DEVELOPED * * Water : DEVELOPED * * * * * * Sale/Loan Information * * * * * * Last Trans W/0 $: * * SaleDt: 12/17/96 Doc# : 474693 Buyer : DEAN,RONALD G * * SaleAm: $71,500 F $/SqFt: $62.17 Seller: GANDER,GERARD J * * 1st Td: $71,397 LoanTy: FHA/FIX/ Lender: COUNTRYWDE HM LN * * +Addl: PrevDt: Title : FIRST AMERICAN * * PrevAm: * * * * * * Assessment/Tax Information * * * * Assd : $68,000 Tax : $1,262.94 * * Land : $20,400 Status: CUR * * Improv: $47,600 TRA : 018234 * * perc: 709g Exempt: * * TaxYr : 98-99 * * * ****************************************************************************** THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS SOURCED FROM PUBLIC DOCUMENTS AND IS NOT GUARANTEED Copyright (C) 1998 Acxiom Corporation • Prope Profile - Riverside LANDAMERICA Prepared For: Acnt Rep: Attention C/S Rep: ****************************************************************************** * * * APN : 627-061-029 Phone : * * Ownerl: JACOBS,CHRISTOPHER P & MECAH B OwnShp: * * Owner2 : Pg-Grd: 213-B1/848-E1 * * Site : 44630 SAN CLEMENTE CIR Census: 0451.022 * * : PALM DESERT CA 92260 Zoning: R1 * * Mail : 44630 SAN CLEMENTE CIR Tract : 00000-00 * * : PALM DESERT CA 92260 Lot/B1: L-0037/ * * Legal : LOT 37 MB 021/016 PALMA VILLAGE UNIT 7 * * FloodP: 060629 0003 * * * * * * Property Characteristics * * * * * * Use : SINGLE RESIDENCE * * Yr Blt: 1994 SqFeet: 2,000 GarSqF: 483 * * BedBth: 4/1.7 Addtnl: GarTyp: ATTACHED * * #Story: 1 Roof : TILE CarSqF: * * #Units: 1 Ht/C1 : B GarTy2: * * Lotsz : FirePl: OutImp: * * Gas : DEVELOPED Pool StSurf: YES * * Sewer : DEVELOPED View MscBdg: * * Electr: DEVELOPED * * Water : DEVELOPED * * * * * * Sale/Loan Information * * * * * * Last Trans W/0 $: * * SaleDt: 01/29/99 Doc# : 35716 Buyer : JACOBS,CHRISTOPH * * SaleAm: $148, 000 F $/SqFt: $74 .00 Seller: TUCKER,ROBERT T * * 1st Td: $150, 960 LoanTy: VA/FIX/ Lender: HOMESIDE LENDING * * +Addl: PrevDt: Title : FIDELITY NATIONA * * PrevAm: * * * * * * Assessment/Tax Information * * * * Assd : $114,500 Tax : $1,522.52 * * Land : $34,350 Status: CUR * * Improv: $80, 150 TRA : 018002 * * perc: 70% Exempt: * * TaxYr : 98-99 * * * ****************************************************************************** THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS SOURCED FROM PUBLIC DOCUMENTS AND IS NOT GUARANTEED Copyright (C) 1998 Acxiom Corporation • Prope Profile - Riverside LANDAMERICA Prepared For: Acnt Rep: Attention C/S Rep: ****************************************************************************** * * * APN : 627-061-030 Phone : * * Ownerl: COSDEN,EVAN & SUSAN E OwnShp: * * Owner2: Pg-Grd: 213-B1/848-E1 * * Site : 44650 SAN CLEMENTE CIR Census: 0451.022 * * : PALM DESERT CA 92260 Zoning: R1 * * Mail : 44650 SAN CLEMENTE CIR Tract : 00000-00 * * : PALM DESERT CA 92260 Lot/B1: L-0038/ * * Legal : LOT 38 MB 021/016 PALMA VILLAGE UNIT 7 * * F1oodP: 060629 0003 * * * * * * Property Characteristics * * * * * * Use : SINGLE RESIDENCE * * Yr Blt: 1994 SqFeet: 2,025 GarSqF: 483 * * BedBth: 4/2 .5 Addtnl: GarTyp: ATTACHED * * #Story: 1 Roof : TILE CarSqF: * * #Units: 1 Ht/C1 : B GarTy2: * * Lotsz : FirePl: Y Outlmp: * * Gas : DEVELOPED Pool StSurf: YES * * Sewer : DEVELOPED View MscBdg: * * Electr: DEVELOPED * * Water : DEVELOPED * * * * * * Sale/Loan Information * * * * * * Last Trans W/O $: * * SaleDt: 06/23/98 Doc# : 254799 Buyer : COSDEN,EVAN & SU * * SaleAm: $160, 000 $/SqFt: $79.01 Seller: CARMI, IRAD S & R * * 1st Td: $144,000 LoanTy: /FIX/ Lender: APPLE MTG * * +Addl: PrevDt: 06/16/95 Title : BENEFIT LAND * * PrevAm: $162,000 F * * * * * * Assessment/Tax Information * * * * Assd : $150,000 Tax : $1,851.88 * * Land : $35, 010 Status: CUR * * Improv: $114,990 TRA : 018002 * * perc: 761 Exempt: * * TaxYr : 98-99 * * * ****************************************************************************** THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS SOURCED FROM PUBLIC DOCUMENTS AND IS NOT GUARANTEED Copyright (C) 1998 Acxiom Corporation . Prope Profile - Riverside LANDAMERICA Prepared For: Acnt Rep: Attention C/S Rep: ****************************************************************************** * * * APN : 627-061-022 Phone : * * Ownerl: WEYCKER,SUSAN E OwnShp: * * Owner2 : Pg-Grd: 213-B1/848-E1 * * Site : 73100 SAN GORGONIO WAY Census: 0451.022 * * : PALM DESERT CA 92260 Zoning: R1 * * Mail : 73100 SAN GORGONIO WAY Tract : 00000-00 * * : PALM DESERT CA 92260 Lot/B1: L-0024/ * * Legal : LOT 24 MB 021/016 PALMA VILLAGE UNIT 7 * * F1oodP: 060629 0003 * * * * * * Property Characteristics * * * * * * Use : SINGLE RESIDENCE * * Yr Blt: 1981 SgFeet: 1,344 GarSqF: 576 * * BedBth: 4/2 .0 Addtnl: GarTyp: ATTACHED * * #Story: 1 Roof : ROLL COMP CarSqF: * * #Units: 1 Ht/C1 : B GarTy2: * * Lotsz : 7,840 FirePl: Y OutImp: * * Gas : DEVELOPED Pool StSurf: YES * * Sewer : DEVELOPED View MscBdg: * * Electr: DEVELOPED * * Water : DEVELOPED * * * * * * Sale/Loan Information * * * * * * Last Trans W/O $: * * SaleDt: 10/09/98 Doc# : 439876 Buyer : WEYCKER,SUSAN E * * SaleAm: $90, 000 F $/SqFt: $66.96 Seller: FRIEDRICH,MARILY * * 1st Td: $89, 148 LoanTy: FHA/FIX/ Lender: COUNTRYWDE HM LN * * +Addl: PrevDt: Title : FIDELITY NATIONA * * PrevAm: * * * * * * Assessment/Tax Information * * * * Assd : $87,500 Tax : $958.12 * * Land : $26,250 Status: CUR * * Improv: $61,250 TRA : 018002 * * perc: 70% Exempt: * * TaxYr : 98-99 * * * ****************************************************************************** THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS SOURCED FROM PUBLIC DOCUMENTS AND IS NOT GUARANTEED Copyright (C) 1998 Acxiom Corporation • Prope Profile - Riverside LANDAMERICA Prepared For: Acnt Rep: Attention C/S Rep: ****************************************************************************** * * * APN : 627-071-020 Phone : * * Ownerl: CASTANEDA,LENA G OwnShp: * * Owner2: Pg-Grd: 158-B2/848-El * * Site : 44785 SAN CLEMENTE CIR Census: 0451.022 * * : PALM DESERT CA 92260 Zoning: R1 * * Mail : 44785 SAN CLEMENTE CIR Tract : 00000-00 * * : PALM DESERT CA 92260 Lot/B1: L-0121/ * * Legal : LOT 121 MB 021/016 PALMA VILLAGE UNIT 7 * * FloodP: 060629 0003 * * * * * * Property Characteristics * * * * * * Use : SINGLE RESIDENCE * * Yr Blt: 1972 SqFeet: 1,120 GarSqF: 378 * * BedBth: 2/1.0 Addtnl: GarTyp: ATTACHED * * #Story: 1 Roof : ROLL COMP CarSqF: * * #Units: 1 Ht/C1 : B GarTy2: * * Lotsz : 7, 840 FirePl: OutImp: * * Gas : DEVELOPED Pool StSurf: YES * * Sewer : DEVELOPED View MscBdg: * * Electr: DEVELOPED * * Water : DEVELOPED * * * * * * Sale/Loan Information * * * * * * Last Trans W/O $: * * SaleDt: 12/18/98 Doc# : 550682 Buyer : CASTANEDA,LENA G * * SaleAm: $92, 000 F $/SqFt: $82.14 Seller: DUNBAR,GEOFFREY * * 1st Td: $91,247 LoanTy: FHA/FIX/ Lender: COUNTRYWDE HM LN * * +Addl: $2,760 PrevDt: Title : CHICAGO TITLE * * PrevAm: * * * * * * Assessment/Tax Information * * * * Assd : $73,500 Tax : $1, 173 .66 * * Land : $22,050 Status: CUR * * Improv: $51,450 TRA : 018002 * * perc: 705:5 Exempt: * * TaxYr : 98-99 * * * ****************************************************************************** THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS SOURCED FROM PUBLIC DOCUMENTS AND IS NOT GUARANTEED Copyright (C) 1998 Acxiom Corporation t t • • Prope Profile - Riverside LANDAMERICA Prepared For: Acnt Rep: Attention C/S Rep: ****************************************************************************** * * * APN : 627-082-001 Phone : * * Ownerl: ROSAS,ALFONSO L & ANDREA M OwnShp: * * Owner2: Pg-Grd: 213-B1/848-E1 * * Site : 73275 ROYAL PALM DR Census: 0451.022 * * : PALM DESERT CA 92260 Zoning: R205 * * Mail : 73275 ROYAL PALM DR Tract : 00000-00 * * : PALM DESERT CA 92260 Lot/B1: L-0034/ * * Legal : LOT 34 MB 027/038 ROYAL PALMS ESTATES * * FloodP: 060629 0003 * * * * * * Property Characteristics * * * * * * Use : SINGLE RESIDENCE * * Yr Blt: 1988 SqFeet: 1,608 GarSqF: 484 * * BedBth: 4/1.7 Addtnl: GarTyp: ATTACHED * * #Story: 1 Roof : TILE CarSqF: * * #Units: 1 Ht/Cl : B GarTy2: * * Lotsz : 8,712 FirePl: Y Outlmp: * * Gas : DEVELOPED Pool StSurf: YES * * Sewer : DEVELOPED View MscBdg: * * Electr: DEVELOPED * * Water : DEVELOPED * * * * * * Sale/Loan Information * * * * * * Last Trans W/O $: * * SaleDt: 09/18/98 Doc# : 398386 Buyer : ROSAS,ALFONSO L * * SaleAm: $115, 000 $/SqFt: $71.52 Seller: HUD * * 1st Td: $116,503 LoanTy: FHA/FIX/ Lender: COUNTRYWDE HM LN * * +Addl: PrevDt: 07/01/98 Title : LAWYERS TITLE * * PrevAm: $133, 024 T * * * * * * Assessment/Tax Information * * * * Assd : $99,500 Tax : $1,496 .12 * * Land : $29,850 Status: CUR * * Improv: $69,650 TRA : 018234 * * perc: 70% Exempt: * * TaxYr : 98-99 * * * ****************************************************************************** THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS SOURCED FROM PUBLIC DOCUMENTS AND IS NOT GUARANTEED Copyright (C) 1998 Acxiom Corporation tom: • • Prope Profile - Riverside LANDAMERICA Prepared For: Acnt Rep: Attention C/S Rep: ****************************************************************************** * * * APN : 627-082-003 Phone : (760) 341-5060 * * Ownerl: GIROUX,DANIEL B & LYNDA J OwnShp: * * Owner2: Pg-Grd: 213-B1/848-E1 * * Site : 73305 ROYAL PALM DR Census: 0451.022 * * : PALM DESERT CA 92260 Zoning: R205 * * Mail : PO BOX 3225 Tract : 00000-00 * * : PALM DESERT CA 92261 Lot/B1: L-0032/ * * Legal : LOT 32 MB 027/038 ROYAL PALMS ESTATES * * FloodP: 060629 0003 * * * * * * Property Characteristics * * * * * * Use : 2 OR 3 UNIT RES * * Yr Blt: 1966 SqFeet: 3,276 GarSqF: 483 * * BedBth: 4/4.0 Addtnl: GarTyp: ATTACHED * * #Story: 1 Roof : ROLL COMP CarSqF: * * #Units: Ht/C1 : B GarTy2: * * Lotsz : 8,712 FirePl: Y OutImp: * * Gas : DEVELOPED Pool StSurf: YES * * Sewer : DEVELOPED View MscBdg: * * Electr: DEVELOPED * * Water : DEVELOPED * * * * * * Sale/Loan Information * * * * * * Last Trans W/O $: * * SaleDt: 05/29/97 + Doc# : 187157 Buyer : GIROUX,DANIEL B * * SaleAm: $280,000 F $/SqFt: $85.47 Seller: ANDERSON,RICHARD * * 1st Td: LoanTy: Lender: * * +Addl: PrevDt: Title : FIRST AMERICAN * * PrevAm: * * * * * * Assessment/Tax Information * * * * Assd : $142,800 Tax : $2,157.98 * * Land : $25,505 Status: CUR * * Improv: $117,295 TRA : 018307 * * perc: 821; Exempt: * * TaxYr : 98-99 * * * ****************************************************************************** THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS SOURCED FROM PUBLIC DOCUMENTS AND IS NOT GUARANTEED Copyright (C) 1998 Acxiom Corporation • Prope Profile - Riverside LANDAMERICA Prepared For: Acnt Rep: Attention C/S Rep: ****************************************************************************** * * * APN : 627-082-004 Phone : (760) 341-5060 * * Ownerl: GIROUX,DANIEL B & LYNDA J OwnShp: * * Owner2: Pg-Grd: 213-B1/848-El * * Site : 73315 ROYAL PALM DR A Census: 0451.022 * * : PALM DESERT CA 92260 Zoning: R205 * * Mail : PO BOX 3225 Tract : 00000-00 * * : PALM DESERT CA 92261 Lot/B1: L-0031/ * * Legal : LOT 31 MB 027/038 ROYAL PALMS ESTATES * * FloodP: 060629 0003 * * * * * * Property Characteristics * * * * * * Use : 2 OR 3 UNIT RES * * Yr Blt: 1966 SqFeet: 3,276 GarSqF: 483 * * BedBth: 4/4.0 Addtnl: GarTyp: ATTACHED * * #Story: 1 Roof : ROLL COMP CarSqF: * * #Units: Ht/C1 : B GarTy2: * * Lotsz : 8,712 FirePl: Y OutImp: * * Gas : DEVELOPED Pool : Y StSurf: YES * * Sewer : DEVELOPED View MscBdg: * * Electr: DEVELOPED * * Water : DEVELOPED * * * * * * Sale/Loan Information * * * * * * Last Trans W/O $: * * SaleDt: 05/29/97 + Doc# : 187157 Buyer : GIROUX,DANIEL B * * SaleAm: $280, 000 F $/SqFt: $85.47 Seller: ANDERSON,RICHARD * * 1st Td: LoanTy: Lender: * * +Addl: PrevDt: Title : FIRST AMERICAN * * PrevAm: * * * * * * Assessment/Tax Information * * * * Assd : $142,800 Tax : $2,221.50 * * Land : $25,505 Status: CUR * * Improv: $117,295 TRA : 018307 * * perc: 82% Exempt: * * TaxYr : 98-99 * * * ****************************************************************************** THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS SOURCED FROM PUBLIC DOCUMENTS AND IS NOT GUARANTEED Copyright (C) 1998 Acxiom Corporation • Prope Profile - Riverside LANDAMERICA Prepared For: Acnt Rep: Attention C/S Rep: ****************************************************************************** * * * APN : 627-032-035 Phone : * * Ownerl: LI,YI N OwnShp: * * Owner2: Pg-Grd: 203-B6/848-E1 * * Site : 73150 GUADALUPE AVE Census: 0451.023 * * : PALM DESERT CA 92260 Zoning: R207 * * Mail : 73150 GUADALUPE AVE Tract : 00000-00 * * : PALM DESERT CA 92260 Lot/B1: L-0299/ * * Legal : LOT 299 MB 027/036 PALMA VILLAGE UNIT 12 * * FloodP: 060629 0003 * * * * * * Property Characteristics * * * * * * Use : SINGLE RESIDENCE * * Yr Blt: 1974 SqFeet: 1,510 GarSqF: 460 * * BedBth: 4/1.7 Addtnl: GarTyp: ATTACHED * * #Story: 1 Roof : ROLL COMP CarSqF: * * #Units: 1 Ht/C1 : B GarTy2: * * Lotsz : 7,405 FirePl: OutImp: * * Gas : DEVELOPED Pool StSurf: YES * * Sewer : DEVELOPED View MscBdg: * * Electr: DEVELOPED * * Water : DEVELOPED * * * * * * Sale/Loan Information * * * * * * Last Trans W/O $: * * SaleDt: 08/27/98 Doc# : 360491 Buyer : LI,YI N * * SaleAm: $103,000 $/SqFt: $68.21 Seller: FGREENWALD,KENYO * * 1st Td: $82,400 LoanTy: /FIX/ Lender: EQUITY 123 LLC * * +Addl: PrevDt: Title : ORANGE COAST TIT * * PrevAm: * * * * * * Assessment/Tax Information * * * * Assd : $80,500 Tax : $1,228.44 * * Land : $24, 150 Status: CUR * * Improv: $56,350 TRA : 018208 * * perc: 70% Exempt: * * TaxYr : 98-99 * * * ****************************************************************************** THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS SOURCED FROM PUBLIC DOCUMENTS AND IS NOT GUARANTEED Copyright (C) 1998 Acxiom Corporation • Prope Profile - Riverside LANDAMERICA Prepared For: Acnt Rep: Attention C/S Rep: ****************************************************************************** * * * APN : 627-032-042 Phone : * * Ownerl: REID,DANIEL J OwnShp: * * Owner2: Pg-Grd: 203-B6/848-E1 * * Site : 73250 GUADALUPE AVE Census: 0451.023 * * : PALM DESERT CA 92260 Zoning: R207 * * Mail : 77777 COUNTRY CLUB DR 235 Tract : 00000-00 * * : PALM DESERT CA 92211 Lot/B1: L-0292/ * * Legal : LOT 292 MB 027/036 PALMA VILLAGE UNIT 12 * * FloodP: 060629 0003 * * * * * * Property Characteristics * * * * * * Use : SINGLE RESIDENCE * * Yr Blt: 1984 SqFeet: 1,380 GarSqF: 400 * * BedBth: 4/1.7 Addtnl: GarTyp: ATTACHED * * #Story: 1 Roof : TILE CarSqF: * * #Units: 1 Ht/C1 : B GarTy2: * * Lotsz : 7,405 FirePl: Y OutImp: * * Gas : DEVELOPED Pool : Y StSurf: YES * * Sewer : DEVELOPED View MscBdg: * * Electr: DEVELOPED * * Water : DEVELOPED * * * * * * Sale/Loan Information * * * * * * Last Trans W/O $: * * SaleDt: 07/16/99 Doc# : 319046 Buyer : REID,DANIEL J * * SaleAm: $156,000 F $/SqFt: $113.04 Seller: SCMITT,SYLVIA MA * * 1st Td: $154,814 LoanTy: FHA/FIX/ Lender: NORTH AMER MTG * * +Addl: PrevDt: 04/17/95 Title : FIRST AMERICAN * * PrevAm: $76, 000 P * * * * * * Assessment/Tax Information * * * * Assd : $115,000 Tax : $1,673.22 * * Land : $25, 001 Status: CUR * * Improv: $89, 999 TRA : 018293 * * perc: 78% Exempt: * * TaxYr : 98-99 * * * ****************************************************************************** THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS SOURCED FROM PUBLIC DOCUMENTS AND IS NOT GUARANTEED Copyright (C) 1998 Acxiom Corporation • Prope Profile - Riverside LANDAMERICA Prepared For: Acnt Rep: Attention C/S Rep: ****************************************************************************** * * * APN : 627-062-004 Phone : (562)431-0837 * * Ownerl: PAKIZ,MILAN K ETAL OwnShp: * * Owner2: Pg-Grd: 213-B1/848-E1 * * Site : 44759 SAN ANTONIO CIR Census: 0451.022 * * : PALM DESERT CA 92260 Zoning: R1 * * Mail : 1950 CONQUISTA AVE Tract : 00000-00 * * : LONG BEACH CA 90815 Lot/Bl: L-0016/ * * Legal : LOT 16 MB 021/016 PALMA VILLAGE UNIT 7 * * FloodP: 060629 0003 * * * * * * Property Characteristics * * * * * * Use : SINGLE RESIDENCE * * Yr Blt: 1989 SqFeet: 1,452 GarSqF: 483 * * BedBth: 3/2.0 Addtnl: GarTyp: ATTACHED * * #Story: 1 Roof : TILE CarSqF: * * #Units: 1 Ht/C1 : B GarTy2: * * Lotsz : 7,405 FirePl: Y Outlmp: * * Gas : DEVELOPED Pool : Y StSurf: YES * * Sewer : DEVELOPED View MscBdg: * * Electr: DEVELOPED * * Water : DEVELOPED * * * * * * Sale/Loan Information * * * * * * Last Trans W/O $: 10/14/98 444640 * * SaleDt: 01/17/97 Doc# : 18367 Buyer : PAKIZ,MILAN K ET * * SaleAm: $113,500 F $/SqFt: $78 .17 Seller: PAKIZ,STEVEN L * * 1st Td: $47, 000 LoanTy: /FIX/ Lender: AMER SAV BK * * +Addl: PrevDt: Title : FIDELITY NATIONA * * PrevAm: * * * * * * Assessment/Tax Information * * * * Assd : $115,770 Tax : $1,557.98 * * Land : $30,610 Status: CUR * * Improv: $85, 160 TRA : 018193 * * perc: 73% Exempt: * * TaxYr : 98-99 * * * ****************************************************************************** THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS SOURCED FROM PUBLIC DOCUMENTS AND IS NOT GUARANTEED Copyright (C) 1998 Acxiom Corporation Prope _ Profile - Riverside LANDAMERICA Prepared For: Acnt Rep: Attention C/S Rep: ****************************************************************************** * * * APN : 627-071-021 Phone : * * Ownerl: RIDDLE,FRANKIE OwnShp: * * Owner2 : Pg-Grd: /848-E1 * * Site : 44805 SAN CLEMENTE CIR Census: 0451.022 * * : PALM DESERT CA 92240 Zoning: R1 * * Mail : 44805 SAN CLEMENTE CIR Tract : 00000-00 * * : PALM DESERT CA 92240 Lot/B1: L-0120/ * * Legal : LOT 120 MB 021/016 PALMA VILLAGE UNIT 7 * * FloodP: 060629 0003 * * * * * * Property Characteristics * * * * * * Use : SINGLE RESIDENCE * * Yr Blt: 1981 SqFeet: 1,267 GarSqF: 462 * * BedBth: 2/2.0 Addtnl: GarTyp: ATTACHED * * #Story: 1 Roof : TILE CarSqF: * * #Units: 1 Ht/C1 : B GarTy2: * * Lotsz : 7,405 FirePl: Y Outlmp: * * Gas : DEVELOPED Pool StSurf: YES * * Sewer : DEVELOPED View MscBdg: * * Electr: UNDERGRND * * Water : DEVELOPED * * * * * * Sale/Loan Information * * * * * * Last Trans W/O $: * * SaleDt: 05/21/99 Doc# : 222731 Buyer : RIDDLE,FRANKIE * * SaleAm: $95,500 F $/SqFt: $75.37 Seller: FEDERAL HOME LOA * * 1st Td: $90,350 LoanTy: /FIX/ Lender: COUNTRYWDE HM LN * * +Addl: PrevDt: Title : FIRST AMERICAN * * PrevAm: * * * * * * Assessment/Tax Information * * * * Assd : $77,500 Tax : $1,214.40 * * Land : $23,250 Status: CUR * * Improv: $54,250 TRA : 018002 * * perc: 70% Exempt: * * TaxYr : 98-99 * * * ****************************************************************************** THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS SOURCED FROM PUBLIC DOCUMENTS AND IS NOT GUARANTEED Copyright (C) 1998 Acxiom Corporation Prope Profile - Riverside LANDAMERICA Prepared For: Acnt Rep: Attention C/S Rep: ****************************************************************************** * * * APN : 627-033-003 Phone : * * Ownerl: COX,ROBERT J ETAL OwnShp: * * Owner2: Pg-Grd: 203-B6/848-El * * Site : 73041 GUADALUPE AVE Census: 0451.022 * * : PALM DESERT CA 92260 Zoning: R207 * * Mail : PO BOX 1334 Tract : 00000-00 * * : PALM DESERT CA 92261 Lot/B1: L-0315/ * * Legal : LOT 315 MB 027/036 PALMA VILLAGE UNIT 12 * * FloodP: 060629 0003 * * * * * * Property Characteristics * * * * * * Use : SINGLE RESIDENCE * * Yr Blt: 1979 SqFeet: 1,913 GarSqF: 471 * * BedBth: 2/2.0 Addtnl: 30 GarTyp: ATTACHED * * #Story: 1 Roof : TILE CarSqF: * * #Units: 1 Ht/C1 : B GarTy2: * * Lotsz : 7,405 FirePl: Y Outlmp: * * Gas : DEVELOPED Pool StSurf: YES * * Sewer : NO View MscBdg: * * Electr: DEVELOPED * * Water : DEVELOPED * * * * * * Sale/Loan Information * * * * * * Last Trans W/O $: 01/26/99 29956 * * SaleDt: 12/30/98 Doc# : 565573 Buyer : JOHNSON,RICK E & * * SaleAm: $180, 000 F $/SqFt: $94.09 Seller: SHAVER TRUST * * 1st Td: $135, 000 LoanTy: /VAR/ Lender: FIRST FRANK FIN * * +Addl: PrevDt: 01/27/97 Title : STEWART TITLE * * PrevAm: $ Q * * * * * * Assessment/Tax Information * * * * Assd : $100,000 Tax : $1,375.36 * * Land : $20, 000 Status: CUR * * Improv: $80,000 TRA : 018002 * * perc: 80% Exempt: * * TaxYr : 98-99 * * * ****************************************************************************** THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS SOURCED FROM PUBLIC DOCUMENTS AND IS NOT GUARANTEED Copyright (C) 1998 Acxiom Corporation ********************************************** * Acxiom/DataQuick Systems Report * * * Riverside ********************************************** Prepared for: Provided by: LANDAMERICA Account Rep: 777 TAHQUITZ CANYON WAY#200 Prepared;by: PALM SPRINGS, CA. 92264 (760) 320-1650 ****************************************************************************** * Farms - 5 line : records 1 to 93 * * --- Search Criteria --- * New Map Pg-Grid 848-E1 * Sale Date 9/96 TO 9/99 Ay w e * J * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 93 matching properties were found Wed Sep 15 16 :16 :11 1999 **********************A****************************************************** ** This information is sourced from public documents and is not guaranteed ** The following report was processed using the above parameters and was provided by of LANDAMERICA 1 • Page 1 1 ) Prc1:627-032-024 Site:73040 GUADALUPE AVE*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Ownr:PETERSON,DAWN & LLOYD Mai1:73040 GUADALUPE AVE*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: Zn:R2 Sale:$10, 000P Date:12/30/98 Loans: Xmpt: Yb:1978 Sqft:1,412 Asd:$89, 046 Imp:65% Un:1 Doc#:565173 Tr: 00000-00 Lot: L-0310 Bdrms: 3 Bths: 1.7 Lotsz: 7,405 2 ) Prc1:627-032-025 Site:73050 GUADALUPE AVE*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Ownr:HAYES,SUSAN M Mai1:73050 GUADALUPE AVE*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: Zn:R2 Sale:$80,500F Date:10/10/97 Loans:$72, 930 Xmpt:Y Yb:1977 Sqft:1,412 Asd:$80,500 Imp:62% Un:1 Doc#:369638 Tr: 00000-00 Lot: L-0309 Bdrms: 3 Bths: 1.7 Lotsz: 7,405 3 ) Prc1:627-032-035 Site:73150 GUADALUPE AVE*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Ownr:LI,YI N Mail:73150 GUADALUPE AVE*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: Zn:R2 Sale:$103, 000 Date:08/27/98 Loans:$82,400 Xmpt: Yb:1974 Sgft:1,510 Asd:$80, 500 Imp:70% Un:1 Doc#:360491 Tr: 00000-00 Lot: L-0299 Bdrms: 4 Bths: 1.7 Lotsz: 7,405 4 ) Prc1:627-032-036 Site:73160 GUADALUPE AVE*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Ownr:HERNANDEZ,ELI M & KAT Mail:73160 GUADALUPE AVE*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: (760) 836-3973 Zn:R2 Sale:$85, 000F Date:11/05/97 Loans:$84, 956 Xmpt:Y Yb:1974 Sqft:1,344 Asd:$85, 000 Imp:64% Un:1 Doc#:404061 Tr: 00000-00 Lot: L-0298 Bdrms: 5 Bths: 2.0 Lotsz: 7,405 5 ) Prc1:627-032-042 Site:73250 GUADALUPE AVE*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Ownr:REID,DANIEL J Mail:77777 COUNTRY CLUB DR 235*PALM DESERT C 92211 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: Zn:R2 Sale:$156,000F Date:07/16/99 Loans:$154, 814 Xmpt: Yb:1984 Sgft:1,380 Asd:$115, 000 Imp:78% Un:1 Doc#:319046 Tr: 00000-00 Lot: L-0292 Bdrms: 4 Bths: 1.7 Lotsz: 7,405 6 ) Prc1:627-033-003 Site:73041 GUADALUPE AVE*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Ownr:COX,ROBERT J ETAL Mail:PO BOX 1334*PALM DESERT CA 92261 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: Zn:R2 Sale:$180, 000F Date:12/30/98 Loans:$135, 000 Xmpt: Yb:1979 Sqft:1, 913 Asd:$100, 000 Imp:80% Un:1 Doc#:565573 Tr: 00000-00 Lot: L-0315 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 2.0 Lotsz: 7,405 7 ) Prc1:627-033-006 Site:73071 GUADALUPE AVE*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Ownr:FTB MORTGAGE SERVICES Mail:8001 STEMMONS FWY*DALLAS TX 75247 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: Zn:R2 Sale:$76,449T Date:05/19/99 Loans: Xmpt: Yb:1973 Sqft:816 Asd:$70, 000 Imp:78% Un:1 Doc#:217579 Tr: 00000-00 Lot: L-0318 Bdrms: 3 Bths: 1.0 Lotsz: 7,405 8 ) Prc1:627-033-009 ° Site:73095 GUADALUPE AVE*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Ownr:ZEPEDA,SANTIAGO & ROS Mail:73095 GUADALUPE AVE*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: (760) 340-9518 Zn:R2 Sale:$83, 909F Date:10/31/96 Loans:$83,794 Xmpt:Y Yb:1978 Sgft:1, 141 Asd:$85,578 Imp:64% Un:1 Doc#:419373 Tr: 00000-00 Lot: L-0321 Bdrms: 3 Bths: 1.7 Lotsz: 7,405 9 ) Prc1:627-033-010 Site:73105 GUADALUPE AVE*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Ownr:BURCHETT,RICK L Mail:72929 SONORA DR*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: (760) 341-4091 Zn:R2 Sale:$90, 000F Date:03/25/99 Loans:$72, 000 Xmpt: Yb:1978 Sqft:1, 136 Asd:$82, 000 Imp:70% Un:1 Doc#:123321 Tr: 00000-00 Lot: L-0322 Bdrms : 3 Bths: 1.7 Lotsz: 7,405 THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS SOURCED FROM PUBLIC DOCUMENTS AND IS NOT GUARANTEED Copyright (C) 1998 Acxiom Corporation 3)-\ • Page 2 10 ) Prc1:627-033-014 Site:73145 GUADALUPE AVE*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Ownr:SHANNON,BERNARD W Mai1:73145 GUADALUPE AVE*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: Zn:R2 Sale:$89,500 Date:06/02/99 Loans:$91,290 Xmpt: Yb:1980 Sqft:1,496 Asd:$84, 500 Imp:70% Un:1 Doc#:241899 Tr: 00000-00 Lot: L-0326 Bdrms: 3 Bths: 1.7 Lotsz: 7,405 11 ) Prc1:627-033-019 Site:73225 GUADALUPE AVE*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Ownr:MELENDREZ,PAULINO U & Mai1:73225 GUADALUPE AVE*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: Zn:R2 Sale:$89,500F Date:06/11/99 Loans:$89,315 Xmpt: Yb:1974 Sgft:1, 056 Asd:$75, 000 Imp:80% Un:1 Doc#:258962 Tr: 00000-00 Lot: L-0331 Bdrms: 3 Bths: 2.0 Lotsz: 7,405 12 ) Prc1:627-033-021 Site:73245 GUADALUPE AVE*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Ownr:DAVALOS,ROBERTO & LIZ Mail:73245 GUADALUPE AVE*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: Zn:R2 Sale:$139,000F Date:06/24/99 Loans:$138, 076 Xmpt: Yb:1991 Sgft:1,702 Asd:$135, 000 Imp:70% Un:1 Doc#:281482 Tr: 00000-00 Lot: L-0333 Bdrms: 3 Bths: 2.0 Lotsz: 7,405 13 ) Prc1:627-052-027 Site:73360 GUADALUPE AVE*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Ownr:MARQUEZ,JOSE & OFELIA Mail:73360 GUADALUPE AVE*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: (760) 773-3747 Zn:R2 Sale:$100, 000F Date:03/27/97 Loans:$80,000 Xmpt:Y Yb:1989 Sqft:1,569 Asd:$102,000 Imp:70% Un:1 Doc#:101573 Tr: 00000-00 Lot: L-0283 Bdrms: 3 Bths: 2 .0 Lotsz: 7,405 14 ) Prc1:627-053-002 Site:73271 GUADALUPE AVE*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Ownr:WATESKA,JOSEPH A Mail:73271 GUADALUPE AVE*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: (760) 346-0784 Zn:R2 Sale:$156, 000F Date:11/12/97 Loans:$153, 083 Xmpt: Yb:1993 Sqft:1,475 Asd:$156, 000 Imp:74% Un:1 Doc#:414846 Tr: 00000-00 Lot: L-0335 Bdrms: 3 Bths: 1.7 Lotsz: 7,405 15 ) Prc1:627-053-004 Site:73301 GUADALUPE AVE*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Ownr:EVANS,RICHARD Mail:68269 PASADA RD*CATHEDRAL CITY CA 92234 Use:APARTMNT 4+UNIT Ph: Zn:R2 Sale:$63, 000P Date:04/16/99 Loans:$28,823 Xmpt: Yb: Sqft: Asd:$403,490 Imp:84% Un:9 Doc#:162721 Tr: 00000-00 Lot: L-0338 Bdrms: Bths: Lotsz: 16 ) Prc1:627-061-006 Site:44650 MONTEREY AVE*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Ownr:CY,PD Mai1:76430 HOLLYHOCK DR*PALM DESERT CA 92211 Use:2 OR 3 UNIT RES Ph: Zn:R2 Sale:$160,000F Date:05/15/98 Loans :$363,600 Xmpt: Yb:1965 Sgft:1,540 Asd:$102, 999 Imp:74% Un:1 Doc#:197271 Tr: 00000-00 Lot: L-0002 Bdrms: 4 Bths: 2 .0 Lotsz: 7,405 17 ) Prc1:627-061-007 a Site:44666 MONTEREY AVE*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Ownr:MYERS INV CO Mail:136 S ORANGE ST*GLENDALE CA 91204 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: Zn:R2 Sale:$152, 500F Date:10/09/98 Loans: Xmpt: Yb:1948 Sqft:925 Asd:$16,690 Imp:63% Un:1 Doc#:439064 Tr: 00000-00 Lot: L-0003 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 1.0 Lotsz: 7,405 18 ) Prc1:627-061-021 Site:44732 SAN ANTONIO CIR*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Ownr:LANDER,JEFFREY J Mai1:74225 COVERED WAGON TRL*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: Zn:Rl Sale:$50, 000 Date:01/16/98 Loans:$40, 000 Xmpt : Yb:1973 Sqft:816 Asd:$61,200 Imp:50% Un:1 Doc#:15956 Tr: 00000-00 Lot: L-0023 Bdrms: 3 Bths: 1.0 Lotsz: 7,405 THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS SOURCED FROM PUBLIC DOCUMENTS AND IS NOT GUARANTEED Copyright (C) 1998 Acxiom Corporation • Page 3 - 19 ) Prc1:627-061-022 Site:73100 SAN GORGONIO WAY*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Ownr:WEYCKER,SUSAN E Mail:73100 SAN GORGONIO WAY*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: Zn:R1 Sale:$90, 000F Date:10/09/98 Loans:$89, 148 Xmpt: Yb:1981 Sqft:1,344 Asd:$87,500 Imp:70% Un:1 Doc#:439876 Tr: 00000-00 Lot: L-0024 Bdrms: 4 Bths: 2 .0 Lotsz: 7,840 20 ) Prc1:627-061-024 Site:44735 SAN CLEMENTE CIR*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Ownr:LALIBERTE,MARC E Mail:44735 SAN CLEMENTE CIR*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: Zn:Rl Sale:$97, 000 Date:02/17/99 Loans:$91,490 Xmpt: Yb:1993 Sqft:1,251 Asd:$103,500 Imp:70% Un:1 Doc#:61220 Tr: 00000-00 Lot: L-0026 Bdrms: 3 Bths: 2.0 Lotsz: 7,405 21 ) Prc1:627-061-026 Site:44673 SAN CLEMENTE CIR*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Ownr:ENGSTROM,GLENN H Mail:74880 FAIRWAY DR*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: Zn:Rl Sale:$10,000P Date:07/09/99 Loans:$80, 000 Xmpt: Yb:1955 Sqft:1,321 Asd:$64, 000 Imp:70% Un:1 Doc#:307029 Tr: 00000-00 Lot: L-0028 Bdrms: 3 Bths: 2 .7 Lotsz: 12, 196 22 ) Prc1:627-061-029 Site:44630 SAN CLEMENTE CIR*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Ownr:JACOBS,CHRISTOPHER P Mail:44630 SAN CLEMENTE CIR*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: Zn:Rl Sale:$148, 000F Date:01/29/99 Loans:$150,960 Xmpt: Yb:1994 Sqft:2,000 Asd:$114,500 Imp:70% Un:1 Doc#:35716 Tr: 00000-00 Lot: L-0037 Bdrms: 4 Bths: 1.7 Lotsz: 23 ) Prc1:627-061-030 Site:44650 SAN CLEMENTE CIR*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Ownr:COSDEN,EVAN & SUSAN E Mail:44650 SAN CLEMENTE CIR*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: Zn:Rl Sale:$160,000 Date:06/23/98 Loans:$144, 000 Xmpt: Yb:1994 Sqft:2, 025 Asd:$150, 000 Imp:76% Un:1 Doc#:254799 Tr: 00000-00 Lot: L-0038 Bdrms: 4 Bths: 2.5 Lotsz: 24 ) Prc1:627-061-031 Site:44670 SAN CLEMENTE CIR*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Ownr:HERNANDEZ,JOEL F Mail:44670 SAN CLEMENTE CIR*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: (760) 568-6635 Zn:Rl Sale:$55, 000F Date:06/26/97 Loans :$61, 100 Xmpt:Y Yb:1974 Sgft:1,200 Asd:$66,300 Imp:61% Un:1 Doc#:225063 Tr: 00000-00 Lot: L-0039 Bdrms: 4 Bths: 1.7 Lotsz: 12, 196 25 ) Prc1:627-061-041 Site:44519 SAN ANSELMO AVE*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Ownr:ZIMMERMAN,JOAN D Mail:70881 WINDSOR CIR*RANCHO MIRAGE CA 92270 Use:APARTMNT 4+UNIT Ph: Zn:CP Sale:$133, 000F Date:06/15/98 Loans:$99,750 Xmpt: Yb:1959 Sqft:932 Asd:$212,891 Imp:77% Un: Doc#:243178 Tr: - Lot: - Bdrms: 2 Bths: 1.0 Lotsz: 11,325 26 ) Prc1:627-062-001 ° Site:44684 SAN ANTONIO CIR*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Ownr:SCHULER,BRADFORD W & Mail:520 STONE CANYON WAY*BREA CA 92821 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: Zn:Rl Sale:$60, 000 Date:10/31/97 Loans:$42, 000 Xmpt: Yb:1959 Sqft:828 Asd:$60, 000 Imp:58% Un:1 Doc#:398809 Tr: 00000-00 Lot: L-0013 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 1.0 Lotsz: 7,405 27 ) Prc1:627-062-004 Site:44759 SAN ANTONIO CIR*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Ownr:PAKIZ,MILAN K ETAL Mail:1950 CONQUISTA AVE*LONG BEACH CA 90815 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: (562)431-0837 Zn:Rl Sale:$113,500F Date:01/17/97 Loans:$47,000 Xmpt: Yb:1989 Sqft:1,452 Asd:$115,770 Imp:73% Un:1 Doc#:18367 Tr: 00000-00 Lot: L-0016 Bdrms: 3 Bths: 2.0 Lotsz: 7,405 THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS SOURCED FROM PUBLIC DOCUMENTS AND IS NOT GUARANTEED Copyright (C) 1998 Acxiom Corporation Page 4 28 ) Prc1:627-063-002 Site:44760 SAN CLEMENTE CIR*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Ownr:RABBANIAN,TERESA L Mail:44760 SAN CLEMENTE CIR*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Use:2 OR 3 UNIT RES Ph: (310) 839-1565 Zn:Rl Sale: Date:06/01/97 Loans: Xmpt:Y Yb:1947 Sgft:1,208 Asd:$75,209 Imp:59% Un: Doc#:205685 Tr: 00000-00 Lot: L-0032 Bdrms: 3 Bths: 1.7 Lotsz: 7,405 29 ) Prc1:627-063-006 Site:44651 SAN CLEMENTE CIR*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Ownr:HAMMOND,JOHN R Mail:44651 SAN CLEMENTE CIR*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: (760) 345-1463 Zn:Rl Sale:$75, 000F Date:11/19/97 Loans:$75,000 Xmpt: Yb:1959 Sqft:859 Asd:$75, 000 Imp:60% Un:1 Doc#:425150 Tr: 00000-00 Lot: L-0036 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 1.0 Lotsz: 7,840 30 ) Prc1:627-071-020 Site:44785 SAN CLEMENTE CIR*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Ownr:CASTANEDA,LENA G Mai1:44785 SAN CLEMENTE CIR*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: Zn:Rl Sale:$92, 000F Date:12/18/98 Loans:$94, 007 Xmpt: Yb:1972 Sgft:1, 120 Asd:$73,500 Imp:70% Un:1 Doc#:550682 Tr: 00000-00 Lot: L-0121 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 1.0 Lotsz: 7,840 31 ) Prc1:627-071-021 Site:44805 SAN CLEMENTE CIR*PALM DESERT CA 92240 Ownr:RIDDLE,FRANKIE Mail:44805 SAN CLEMENTE CIR*PALM DESERT CA 92240 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: Zn:R1 Sale:$95,500F Date:05/21/99 Loans:$90,350 Xmpt: Yb:1981 Sgft:1,267 Asd:$77,500 Imp:70% Un:1 Doc#:222731 Tr: 00000-00 Lot: L-0120 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 2.0 Lotsz: 7,405 32 ) Prc1:627-072-001 Site:73081 SAN GORGONIO WAY*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Ownr:QUINN,CHRISTINA Mail:73081 SAN GORGONIO WAY*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: Zn:Rl Sale:$73,500F Date:04/08/98 Loans:$69,825 Xmpt: Yb:1956 Sgft:838 Asd:$70, 000 Imp:78% Un:1 Doc#:133910 Tr: 00000-00 Lot: L-0131 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 1.0 Lotsz: 7, 840 33 ) Prc1:627-073-002 Site:44810 SAN CLEMENTE CIR*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Ownr:TIRADO,ADA L Mail:44810 SAN CLEMENTE CIR*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: Zn:Rl Sale:$94, 000F Date:10/09/97 Loans:$92, 380 Xmpt:Y Yb:1986 Sgft:1,258 Asd:$94, 000 Imp:56% Un:1 Doc#:368677 Tr: 00000-00 Lot: L-0114 Bdrms: 3 Bths: 2.0 Lotsz: 7,405 34 ) Prc1:627-073-004 Site:44831 SAN CLEMENTE CIR*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Ownr:HOFFMANN,WALTER A Mail:44831 SAN CLEMENTE CIR*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: Zn:Rl Sale:$8, 000P Date:12/29/98 Loans: Xmpt: Yb:1959 Sqft:900 Asd:$64,000 Imp:60% Un:1 Doc#:563176 Tr: 00000-00 Lot: L-0110 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 1.0 Lotsz: 7,405 a 35 ) Prc1:627-073-005 Site:44811 SAN CLEMENTE CIR*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Ownr:FRANCO,ALBERTO S & KA Mail:2000 WEST LOOP S 1300*HOUSTON TX 77027 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: Zn:Rl Sale:$89, 000F Date:09/30/97 Loans:$84,455 Xmpt:Y Yb:1983 Sqft:1, 075 Asd:$89, 000 Imp:71% Un:1 Doc#:356191 Tr: 00000-00 Lot: L-0111 Bdrms: 3 Bths: 1.7 Lotsz: 7,405 36 ) Prc1:627-073-006 Site:73221 SAN GORGONIO WAY*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Ownr:CAZARES,CARLOS & MARI Mail:73221 SAN GORGONIO WAY*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: (760) 836-1908 Zn:Rl Sale:$79, 000F Date:08/15/97 Loans:$79, 141 Xmpt:Y Yb:1972 Sqft:1,216 Asd:$79, 000 Imp:74% Un:1 Doc#:294201 Tr: 00000-00 Lot: L-0112 Bdrms: 3 Bths: 1.7 Lotsz: 7,405 THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS SOURCED FROM PUBLIC DOCUMENTS AND IS NOT GUARANTEED Copyright (C) 1998 Acxiom Corporation ja • • 1 Page 5 37 ) Prc1:627-074-001 Site:73255 SAN GORGONIO WAY*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Ownr:HAYES,GARY & MONICA Mail:73255 SAN GORGONIO WAY*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: (760) 346-6464 Zn:Rl Sale:$60, 000F Date:01/09/98 Loans:$56, 900 Xmpt: Yb:1948 Sqft:1, 183 Asd:$66,300 Imp:69% Un:1 Doc#:8042 Tr: 00000-00 Lot: L-0104 Bdrms: 3 Bths: 1.0 Lotsz: 7,840 38 ) Prc1:627-082-001 Site:73275 ROYAL PALM DR*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Ownr:ROSAS,ALFONSO L & AND Mail:73275 ROYAL PALM DR*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: Zn:R2 Sale:$115, 000 Date:09/18/98 Loans:$116,503 Xmpt: Yb:1988 Sgft:1,608 Asd:$99,500 Imp:70% Un:1 Doc#:398386 Tr: 00000-00 Lot: L-0034 Bdrms: 4 Bths: 1.7 Lotsz: 8,712 39 ) Prc1:627-082-003 Site:73305 ROYAL PALM DR*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Ownr:GIROUX,DANIEL B & LYN Mail:PO BOX 3225*PALM DESERT CA 92261 Use:2 OR 3 UNIT RES Ph: (760) 341-5060 Zn:R2 Sale:$280, 000F Date:05/29/97+ Loans: Xmpt: Yb:1966 Sqft:3,276 Asd:$142,800 Imp:82% Un: Doc#:187157 Tr: 00000-00 Lot: L-0032 Bdrms: 4 Bths: 4 .0 Lotsz: 8,712 40 ) Prc1:627-082-004 Site:73315 ROYAL PALM DR A*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Ownr:GIROUX,DANIEL B & LYN Mail:PO BOX 3225*PALM DESERT CA 92261 Use:2 OR 3 UNIT RES Ph: (760) 341-5060 Zn:R2 Sale:$280,000F Date:05/29/97+ Loans: Xmpt: Yb:1966 Sqft:3,276 Asd:$142, 800 Imp:82% Un: Doc#:187157 Tr: 00000-00 Lot: L-0031 Bdrms: 4 Bths: 4.0 Lotsz: 8,712 41 ) Prc1:627-083-003 Site:73304 SAN GORGONIO WAY*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Ownr:DEAN,RONALD G Mail:73304 SAN GORGONIO WAY*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: Zn:Rl Sale:$71,500F Date:12/17/96 Loans:$71,397 Xmpt: Yb:1948 Sqft:1, 150 Asd:$68, 000 Imp:70% Un:1 Doc#:474693 Tr: 00000-00 Lot: L-0051 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 1.0 Lotsz: 7,840 42 ) Prc1:627-091-006 Site:44787 SAN BENITO CIR*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Ownr:COOPER TRUST Mail:9404 SE SUNCREST DR*PORTLAND OR 97266 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: (503) 392-5803 Zn:Rl Sale:$145,000F Date:03/15/99 Loans: Xmpt: Yb:1992 Sqft:1,475 Asd:$72,780 Imp:73% Un:1 Doc#:103831 Tr: 00000-00 Lot: L-0093 Bdrms: 3 Bths: 1.7 Lotsz: 7,840 43 ) Prc1:627-092-001 Site:44785 SAN BENITO CIR*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Ownr:QUILLING, PAGE & SIMON Mail:72845 ARBOLEDA DR*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: (760) 568-2174 Zn:Rl Sale:$67, 000 Date:05/06/97 Loans:$67, 000 Xmpt: Yb:1978 Sqft:1,850 Asd:$91,800 Imp:66% Un:1 Doc#:155361 Tr: 00000-00 Lot: L-0103 Bdrms: 4 Bths: 1.7 Lotsz: 7,840 44 ) Prc1:627-092-002 ` Site:44805 SAN BENITO CIR*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Ownr:ALTMAN,CAROL M Mail:232 SETTLES DR*CATHEDRAL CITY CA 92234 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: Zn:Rl Sale:$55, 000F Date:05/06/98 Loans: Xmpt: Yb:1973 Sqft:816 Asd:$46, 933 Imp:69% Un:1 Doc#:179187 Tr: 00000-00 Lot: L-0102 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 1.0 Lotsz: 7,405 45 ) Prc1:627-092-013 Site:44790 SAN BENITO CIR*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Ownr:CLARKE,JANIS P Mail:61 EAST LN*SHERIDAN WY 82801 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: (307) 672-8182 Zn:Rl Sale:$90, 000F Date:07/16/98 Loans:$40, 000 Xmpt: Yb:1949 Sqft:1, 194 Asd:$62,500 Imp:70% Un:1 Doc#:293675 Tr: 00000-00 Lot: L-0085 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 1.0 Lotsz: 7,840 THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS SOURCED FROM PUBLIC DOCUMENTS AND IS NOT GUARANTEED Copyright (C) 1998 Acxiom Corporation 3�� • f Page 6 46 ) Prc1:627-092-042 Site:44876 SAN BENITO CIR*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Ownr:TAYLOR,CYNTHIA L Mail:44876 SAN BENITO CIR*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: Zn:Rl Sale:$90, 000F Date:01/15/99 Loans:$76,500 Xmpt: Yb:1948 Sgft:1,655 Asd:$100, 000 Imp:75% Un:1 Doc#:18157 Tr: 00000-00 Lot: L-0088 Bdrms: 3 Bths: 1.7 Lotsz: 17,859 47 ) Prc1:627-192-036 Site:73040 EL PASEO*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Ownr:COTTER,JAMES F Mail:1070 GRAVENSTEIN AVE*SEBASTOPOL CA 95472 Use:MISC. COMMERCIA Ph: Zn:Cl Sale:$845, 000F Date:12/10/96 Loans:$500,000 Xmpt: Yb: Sqft: Asd:$1, 033,460 Imp:65% Un: Doc#:466536 Tr: 00000-00 Lot: P-0001 Bdrms: Bths: Lotsz: 48 ) Prc1:627-231-002 Site:73081 EL PASEO*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Ownr:EL PASEO COLLECTION I Mail:73061 EL PASEO 205*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Use:MISC. COMMERCIA Ph: Zn:Cl Sale:$750,000 Date:11/22/96+ Loans:$4,650,000 Xmpt: Yb: Sqft: Asd:$1,807, 912 Imp:78% Un: Doc#:446569 Tr: 00000-00 Lot: L-0002 Bdrms: Bths: Lotsz: 49 ) Prc1:627-231-011 Site:73061 EL PASEO 205*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Ownr:EL PASEO COLLECTION I Mail:73061 EL PASEO 205*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Use:MISC. COMMERCIA Ph: Zn:CP Sale:$750, 000 Date:11/22/96+ Loans:$4,650, 000 Xmpt: Yb: Sqft: Asd:$2, 173,892 Imp:86% Un: Doc#:446569 Tr: 00000-00 Lot: L-0001 Bdrms: Bths: Lotsz: 18,295 50 ) Prc1:627-232-006 Site:73111 EL PASEO*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Ownr:DEBONNE,BERNARD Mail:PO BOX 1935*PALM DESERT CA 92261 Use:MISC. COMMERCIA Ph: Zn:R3 Sale: Date:03/12/99 Loans: Xmpt: Yb: Sqft: Asd:$275,534 Imp:12% Un: Doc#:101083 Tr: 00000-00 Lot: L-0008 Bdrms: Bths: Lotsz: 51 ) Prc1:627-232-009 Site:73111 EL PASEO*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Ownr:SELLAM TRUST Mail:71111 LA PAZ RD*RANCHO MIRAGE CA 92270 Use:MISC. COMMERCIA Ph: Zn:Cl Sale: Date:ll/25/98+ Loans:$4, 000, 000 Xmpt: Yb: Sqft: Asd:$4, 912,373 Imp:80% Un: Doc#:513375 Tr: 00000-00 Lot: L-0003 Bdrms: Bths: Lotsz: 52 ) Prc1:640-131-018 Site:72816 SIERRA VISTA RD*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Ownr:MARINESCU,MIRELA F Mail:72816 SIERRA VISTA RD*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: Zn:Rl Sale:$140, 000F Date:01/28/98 Loans:$119, 000 Xmpt: Yb:1988 Sgft:1,680 Asd:$140, 000 Imp:78% Un:1 Doc#:30649 Tr: 00000-00 Lot: L-0016 Bdrms: 3 Bths: 1.7 Lotsz: 8,712 53 ) Prc1:640-132-016 ° Site:72820 TAMPICO RD*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Ownr:MCMILLAN,KYLA K Mail:72820 TAMPICO RD*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: Zn:Rl Sale:$85, 000 Date:07/10/97 Loans:$77,761 Xmpt:Y Yb:1979 Sgft:1,527 Asd:$117,300 Imp:65% Un:1 Doc#:242131 Tr: 00000-00 Lot: L-0005 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 1.7 Lotsz: 10,454 54 ) Prc1:640-134-003 Site:72883 SIERRA VISTA RD*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Ownr:BARCKLEY,ROBERT L Mail:72883 SIERRA VISTA RD*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: Zn:Rl Sale:$78,500 Date:04/30/99 Loans:$74,300 Xmpt: Yb:1958 Sgft:1,400 Asd:$116,524 Imp:73% Un:1 Doc#:186764 Tr: 00000-00 Lot: L-0032 Bdrms: 4 Bths: 1.7 Lotsz: 12,632 THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS SOURCED FROM PUBLIC DOCUMENTS AND IS NOT GUARANTEED Copyright (C) 1998 Acxiom Corporation Page 7 55 ) Prc1:640-135-004 Site:72878 SIERRA VISTA RD*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Ownr:VILLA,MICHAEL & CYNTH Mail:72878 SIERRA VISTA RD*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: (760) 340-4176 Zn:Rl Sale:$82, 000F Date:07/24/98 Loans:$65,600 Xmpt: Yb:1958 Sgft:1,400 Asd:$43,353 Imp:85% Un:1 Doc#:307791 Tr: 00000-00 Lot: L-0012 Bdrms: 4 Bths: 1.7 Lotsz: 8,712 56 ) Prc1:640-135-006 Site:72880 SIERRA VISTA RD*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Ownr:MORRELLI,GINA A Mail:72880 SIERRA VISTA RD*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: Zn:Rl Sale:$85, 000F Date:01/27/99 Loans:$84,454 Xmpt: Yb:1957 Sgft:1, 140 Asd:$71,400 Imp:57°s Un:1 Doc#:32604 Tr: 00000-00 Lot: L-0011 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 1.0 Lotsz: 10,890 57 ) Prc1:640-135-015 Site:72892 SIERRA VISTA RD*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Ownr:SHARP,RODNEY Mail:72892 SIERRA VISTA RD*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: (760) 568-5385 Zn:Rl Sale:$150,000F Date:05/27/98 Loans:$146,774 Xmpt: Yb:1988 Sqft:1,827 Asd:$172, 100 Imp:819s Un:1 Doc#:214878 Tr: 00000-00 Lot: L-0008 Bdrms: 3 Bths: 2 .0 Lotsz: 10,890 58 ) Prc1:640-135-024 Site:44475 MONTEREY AVE*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Ownr:CALIFORNIA DESERT ASS Mail:44475 MONTEREY AVE*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Use:MISC. COMMERCIA Ph: Zn:CP Sale: Date:10/01/97 Loans: Xmpt: Yb: Sqft: Asd:$469, 914 Imp:789s, Un: Doc#:364792 Tr: 00000-00 Lot: L-0005 Bdrms: Bths: Lotsz: 34,848 59 ) Prc1:640-220-042 Site:72869 EL PASEO 508*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Ownr:TAYLOR,JEFFREY & TOBY Mail:2144 S 1550 E*BOUNTIFUL UT 84010 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: (801)299-9332 Zn:PR Sale:$92,500F Date:03/04/98 Loans:$74, 000 Xmpt: Yb:1962 Sgft:1,300 Asd:$98,838 Imp:789s Un:l Doc#:77645 Tr: 02445-00 Lot: L-0033 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 1.7 Lotsz: 1,306 60 ) Prc1:640-220-044 Site:72873 EL PASEO 510*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Ownr:MASON,PAULA C & TOWNS Mail:14 STALLION RD*RANCHO PALOS VERDES CA 90275 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn:PR Sale: Date:12/01/96 Loans: Xmpt: Yb:1962 Sgft:2, 020 Asd:$85, 913 Imp:591- Un:l Doc#:474902 Tr: 02445-00 Lot: L-0033 Bdrms: 3 Bths: 2.7 Lotsz: 2, 178 61 ) Prc1:640-220-046 Site:72877 EL PASEO 512*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Ownr:ZEISLER,KARL & JOAN C Mail:426 N 2ND ST*ASPEN CO 81611 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: (970) 925-6817 Zn:PR Sale:$103,000F Date:03/31/98 Loans: Xmpt: Yb:1962 Sgft:1,300 Asd:$89,414 Imp:7611- Un:1 Doc#:121083 Tr: 02445-00 Lot: L-0033 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 1.7 Lotsz: 1,306 62 ) Prc1:640-220-047 ° Site:72979 EL PASEO 513*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Ownr:MALONEY,RONALD B & MA Mail:72979 EL PASEO 513*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: (818) 883-4140 Zn:PR Sale:$150,000F Date:05/22/97 Loans: Xmpt:Y Yb:1962 Sgft:1, 804 Asd:$153, 000 Imp:73% Un:l Doc#:181010 Tr: 02445-00 Lot: L-0013 Bdrms: 3 Bths: 1.7 Lotsz: 1,742 63 ) Prc1:640-220-050 Site:72885 EL PASEO 516*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Ownr:ROBERTS,KAREN R Mail:2223 LEAVENWORTH ST*SAN FRANCISCO CA 94133 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn:PR Sale:$75, 000F Date:03/03/97 Loans:$50, 000 Xmpt: Yb:1962 Sgft:1,470 Asd:$77, 171 Imp:519s Un:l Doc#:71193 Tr: 02445-00 Lot: L-0033 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 1.7 Lotsz: 1, 306 THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS SOURCED FROM PUBLIC DOCUMENTS AND IS NOT GUARANTEED Copyright (C) 1998 Acxiom Corporation • , Page 8 64 ) Prc1:640-230-005 Site:72923 EL PASEO 45A*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Ownr:SHINEMAN,TRUBY D & KA Mail:3613 197TH AVENUE CT E*SUMNER WA 98390 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn:PR Sale:$88, 000F Date:06/01/99 Loans:$70,400 Xmpt: Yb:1960 Sqft:1, 075 Asd:$80, 500 Imp:70% Un:1 Doc#:240605 Tr: 03103-00 Lot: L-0100 Bdrms: 1 Bths: 1.7 Lotsz: 1,742 65 ) Prc1:640-230-010 Site:72921 EL PASEO 44A*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Ownr:DIMITROPOULOS,STEVE Mai1:1803 DOUGLAS ST 103*VICTORIA BC CANADA Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn:PR Sale:$1,000F Date:10/15/98 Loans: Xmpt: Yb:1960 Sqft:1, 075 Asd:$70, 000 Imp:71% Un:1 Doc#:446767 Tr: 03103-00 Lot: L-0100 Bdrms: 1 Bths: 1.7 Lotsz: 871 66 ) Prc1:640-230-014 Site:72919 EL PASEO 43C*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Ownr:TWICHELL,E B & KAREN Mail:72919 EL PASEO 43C*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn:PR Sale:$130, 000F Date:11/25/98 Loans: Xmpt: Yb:1960 Sqft:1,514 Asd:$110, 000 Imp:72% Un:1 Doc#:513257 Tr: 03103-00 Lot: L-0100 Bdrms: 1 Bths: 1.7 Lotsz: 1,306 67 ) Prc1:640-230-015 Site:72919 EL PASEO 43B*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Ownr:DEL GROSSO,REGINA A Mail:72919 EL PASEO 43B*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn:PR Sale:$85, 000F Date:03/25/99 Loans:$80,750 Xmpt: Yb:1960 Sqft:1,002 Asd:$76,000 Imp:70% Un:1 Doc#:124226 Tr: 03103-00 Lot: L-0100 Bdrms: 1 Bths: 1.7 Lotsz: 871 68 ) Prc1:640-230-016 Site:72919 EL PASEO 43A*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Ownr:COCHRAN,W G & KAREN J Mail:362 NE DEKALB AVE*BEND OR 97701 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn:PR Sale:$87, 000F Date:12/18/98 Loans: Xmpt: Yb:1960 Sqft:1,075 Asd:$75, 000 Imp:66% Un:1 Doc#:549066 Tr: 03103-00 Lot: L-0100 Bdrms: 1 Bths: 1.7 Lotsz: 871 69 ) Prc1:640-230-021 Site:72927 EL PASEO 42A*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Ownr:DUBNOW,BERNARD & CHAR Mail:23402 MAMMOTH CAVE DR*TWENTYNINE PALMS 92277 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn:PR Sale:$85,500F Date:11/03/98 Loans: Xmpt: Yb:1960 Sqft:1, 075 Asd:$75, 000 Imp:66% Un:1 Doc#:476228 Tr: 03103-00 Lot: L-0100 Bdrms: 1 Bths: 1.7 Lotsz: 871 70 ) Prc1:640-230-022 Site:72927 EL PASEO 42C*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Ownr:WELLINGS,SEFTON R & C Mail:1920 ROCHE HARBOR RD H*FRIDAY HARBOR WA 98250 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: (360) 378-3059 Zn:PR Sale:$120, 000F Date:07/01/98 Loans: Xmpt: Yb:1960 Sqft:1,514 Asd:$96, 900 Imp:73% Un:1 Doc#:272835 Tr: 03103-00 Lot: L-0100 Bdrms: 1 Bths: 1.7 Lotsz: 1,306 71 ) Prc1:640-230-023 ` Site:72929 EL PASEO*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Ownr:CROW,CONSTANCE Mail:25 BRIDPORT ST S MELBO*VICT 3205 AUSTRA Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn:PR Sale:$75, 000F Date:02/04/97 Loans:$55, 000 Xmpt: Yb:1960 Sqft:1, 002 Asd:$76,500 Imp:66% Un:1 Doc#:37984 Tr: 03103-00 Lot: L-0100 Bdrms: 1 Bths: 1.7 Lotsz: 871 72 ) Prc1:640-240-008 Site:72939 EL PASEO 13C*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Ownr:FRELINGHUYSEN,JOSEPH Mail:PO BOX 270*GLADSTONE NJ 07934 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn:PR Sale:$92, 500F Date:04/15/99 Loans:$12, 500 Xmpt: Yb:1959 Sqft:1, 005 Asd:$52, 151 Imp:53% Un:1 Doc#:159763 Tr: 03103-00 Lot: L-0097 Bdrms: 1 Bths: 1.7 Lotsz: 2, 178 THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS SOURCED FROM PUBLIC DOCUMENTS AND IS NOT GUARANTEED Copyright (C) 1998 Acxiom Corporation . Page 9 73 ) Prc1:640-240-012 Site:72941 EL PASEO 16B*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Ownr:HUGHEY,BARBARA Mail:PO BOX 860*SEARCHLIGHT NV 89046 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn:PR Sale:$75,000F Date:04/30/99 Loans: Xmpt: Yb:1959 Sgft:1, 012 Asd:$65, 061 Imp:66% Un:1 Doc#:183737 Tr: 03103-00 Lot: L-0097 Bdrms: 1 Bths: 1.7 Lotsz: 1,742 74 ) Prc1:640-240-016 Site:72945 EL PASEO 12C*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Ownr:STEWART,ROBERT C Mail:259 AGRONNE AVE*LONG BEACH CA 90803 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn:PR Sale:$80, 000F Date:02/04/99 Loans:$59, 900 Xmpt: Yb:1959 Sgft:1,005 Asd:$57,000 Imp:64% Un:1 Doc#:45350 Tr: 03103-00 Lot: L-0097 Bdrms: 1 Bths: 1.7 Lotsz: 1,742 75 ) Prc1:640-240-020 Site:72949 EL PASEO 11B*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Ownr:MC TAGGART,BRIAR Mail:72949 EL PASEO 11B*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn:PR Sale:$75, 000F Date:01/21/99 Loans:$67, 500 Xmpt: Yb:1959 Sgft:1,012 Asd:$85,000 Imp:64% Un:1 Doc#:23945 Tr: 03103-00 Lot: L-0097 Bdrms: 1 Bths: 1.7 Lotsz: 1,742 76 ) Prc1:640-240-021 Site:72949 EL PASEO 11A*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Ownr:CRICHTON,DOLORES C Mail:2021 SW MAIN ST*PORTLAND OR 97205 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn:PR Sale:$74, 000F Date:07/16/99 Loans:$59,200 Xmpt: Yb:1959 Sqft:984 Asd:$50,328 Imp:56% Un:1 Doc#:318270 Tr: 03103-00 Lot: L-0097 Bdrms: 1 Bths: 1.7 Lotsz: 1,742 77 ) Prc1:640-250-003 Site:72955 EL PASEO 26B*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Ownr:PATZNER,PATRICIA Mail:72955 EL PASEO 26B*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn:PR Sale:$88, 000F Date:06/01/98 Loans:$61,600 Xmpt: Yb:1960 Sgft:970 Asd:$75, 000 Imp:70% Un:1 Doc#:222252 Tr: 03103-00 Lot: L-0098 Bdrms: 1 Bths: 1.7 Lotsz: 1,742 78 ) Prc1:640-250-005 Site:72953 EL PASEO 25B*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Ownr:JONES,MARSHA Mail:5034 COOPER PT*OLYMPIA WA 98502 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn:PR Sale:$60,000F Date:04/23/99 Loans:$42, 000 Xmpt: Yb:1960 Sgft:970 Asd:$75,000 Imp:70% Un:1 Doc#:170880 Tr: 03103-00 Lot: L-0098 Bdrms: 1 Bths: 1.7 Lotsz: 1,742 79 ) Prc1:640-250-006 Site:72953 EL PASEO 25C*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Ownr:CARNRICK,CHRISTOPHER Mail:72953 EL PASEO 25C*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn:PR Sale:$99, 000F Date:02/11/99 Loans:$79,200 Xmpt: Yb:1960 Sgft:1,005 Asd:$66,000 Imp:63% Un:1 Doc#:55794 Tr: 03103-00 Lot: L-0098 Bdrms: 1 Bths: 1.7 Lotsz: 1,742 80 ) Prc1:640-250-010 $ Site:72951 EL PASEO 24C*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Ownr:PARKIN,ROBERT W & DON Mail:259 AGRONNE AVE*LONG BEACH CA 90803 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: (760) 773-3312 Zn:PR Sale:$66, 000 Date:11/21/97 Loans: Xmpt: Yb:1960 Sgft:1, 071 Asd:$66, 000 Imp:69% Un:1 Doc#:430152 Tr: 03103-00 Lot: L-0098 Bdrms: 1 Bths: 1.7 Lotsz: 2,178 81 ) Prc1:640-250-011 Site:72951 EL PASEO 24B*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Ownr:HANSON,LINDA L Mail:2185 BUSH ST 310*SAN FRANCISCO CA 94115 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: (415) 567-1899 Zn:PR Sale:$65, 000F Date:06/12/98 Loans: Xmpt: Yb:1960 Sgft:1, 012 Asd:$80, 000 Imp:56% Un:1 Doc#:241405 Tr: 03103-00 Lot: L-0098 Bdrms: 1 Bths: 1.7 Lotsz: 871 THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS SOURCED FROM PUBLIC DOCUMENTS AND IS NOT GUARANTEED Copyright (C) 1998 Acxiom Corporation • Page 10 4 82 ) Prc1:640-250-012 Site:72951 EL PASEO 24A*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Ownr:SULLIVAN,J W Mail:5934 SKYLINE RD S*SALEM OR 97306 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: (503) 391-8922 Zn:PR Sale:$60,000F Date:03/24/97 Loans: Xmpt: Yb:1960 Sqft:963 Asd:$61,200 Imp:66% Un:1 Doc#:96872 Tr: 03103-00 Lot: L-0098 Bdrms: 1 Bths: 1.7 Lotsz: 1,742 83 ) Prc1:640-250-015 Site:72959 EL PASEO 28B*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Ownr:MCKENZIE,ROSS H & YVE Mai1:3127 WESSEX CLOSE*VICTORIA BC CANADA V8 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn:PR Sale:$25,000 Date:09/06/96 Loans: Xmpt: Yb:1960 Sqft:1,012 Asd:$80, 000 Imp:56% Un:1 Doc#:338784 Tr: 03103-00 Lot: L-0098 Bdrms: 1 Bths: 1.7 Lotsz: 1,742 84 ) Prc1:640-250-018 Site:72965 EL PASEO 23A*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Ownr:MILLER,JACQUELINE M Mail:1015 NOTTINGHAM LN*NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: (949) 548-0498 Zn:PR Sale:$66, 000F Date:08/14/98 Loans:$49,500 Xmpt: Yb:1960 Sgft:1,119 Asd:$85,500 Imp:70% Un:1 Doc#:341912 Tr: 03103-00 Lot: L-0098 Bdrms: 1 Bths: 1.7 Lotsz: 2, 178 85 ) Prc1:640-250-021 Site:72961 EL PASEO 21C*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Ownr:CHIARAMONTE,RENEE A Mail:72961 EL PASEO 21C*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn:PR Sale:$75,000F Date:06/11/99 Loans: Xmpt: Yb:1960 Sqft:1,071 Asd:$81,000 Imp:70% Un:1 Doc#:260292 Tr: 03103-00 Lot: L-0098 Bdrms: 1 Bths: 1.7 Lotsz: 1,742 86 ) Prc1:640-260-003 Site:72973 EL PASEO 35B*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Ownr:BROWN,SUSAN Mail:450 MOUNTAIN RD*LAGUNA BEACH CA 92651 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn:PR Sale:$55, 000F Date:06/26/98 Loans:$32, 500 Xmpt: Yb:1960 Sqft:1, 002 Asd:$46,240 Imp:54% Un:1 Doc#:262586 Tr: 03103-00 Lot: L-0099 Bdrms: 1 Bths: 1.7 Lotsz: 1,742 87 ) Prc1:640-260-008 Site:72971 EL PASEO 36A*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Ownr:WEST-PRINZMETAL TRUST Mail:3028 CASTLE HEIGHTS AVE*LOS ANGELES CA 90034 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn:PR Sale:$67, 000F Date:09/01/98 Loans: Xmpt: Yb:1960 Sqft:1, 173 Asd:$65,000 Imp:69% Un:1 Doc#:371078 Tr: 03103-00 Lot: L-0099 Bdrms: 1 Bths: 1.7 Lotsz: 1,742 88 ) Prc1:640-260-009 Site:72971 EL PASEO 36B*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Ownr:STARR,PAUL F Mail:2034 LAKE ISLE DR*EUGENE OR 97401 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: (541) 465-1085 Zn:PR Sale:$70, 000F Date:04/30/98 Loans:$52,500 Xmpt: Yb:1960 Sgft:981 Asd:$55, 979 Imp:61% Un:1 Doc#:170203 Tr: 03103-00 Lot: L-0099 Bdrms: 1 Bths: 1.7 Lotsz: 1,742 89 ) Prc1:640-260-015 ° Site:72969 EL PASEO 37B*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Ownr:HILBER,DALE & NANCY L Mail:37 SANDPIPER ST*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: (760)773-0844 Zn:PR Sale:$70,000F Date:11/13/98 Loans: Xmpt: Yb:1960 Sqft:981 Asd:$46,250 Imp:54% Un:1 Doc#:493228 Tr: 03103-00 Lot: L-0099 Bdrms: 1 Bths: 1.7 Lotsz: 1,742 90 ) Prc1:640-260-016 Site:72979 EL PASEO 32B*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Ownr:SUMNER,SCOTT P ETAL Mail:412 GLENNEYRE ST*LAGUNA BEACH CA 92651 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn:PR Sale:$33, 000P Date:03/13/98 Loans: Xmpt: Yb:1960 Sqft:1,002 Asd:$46,647 Imp:55% Un:1 Doc#:93222 Tr: 03103-00 Lot: L-0099 Bdrms: 1 Bths: 1.7 Lotsz: 1,742 THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS SOURCED FROM PUBLIC DOCUMENTS AND IS NOT GUARANTEED Copyright (C) 1998 Acxiom Corporation 3� Page 11 91 ) Prc1:640-260-024 Site:72981 EL PASEO 31*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Ownr:DUNCA, IDA R Mail:72981 EL PASEO 31*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Use:CONDO-PRIV ENTR Ph: Zn:PR Sale:$80, 000F Date:10/02/98 Loans: Xmpt: Yb:1960 Sqft:984 Asd:$76, 000 Imp:70°s Un:1 Doc#:427742 Tr: 03103-00 Lot: L-0099 Bdrms: 1 Bths: 1.7 Lotsz: 2,178 92 ) Prc1:644-081-002 Site:68256 CALLE CALAMOSO*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Ownr:FARBER,BRIAN P & MARL Mail:11741 WEST ST*GARDEN GROVE CA 92840 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: (714) 663-2406 Zn:R1 Sale:$39, 000F Date:12/30/98 Loans:$27,300 Xmpt: Yb:1958 Sqft:1,418 Asd:$70,300 Imp:869s Un:1 Doc#:565210 Tr: 00000-00 Lot: L-0124 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 2.7 Lotsz: 8,712 93 ) Prc1:644-082-001 Site:68259 CALLE CALMOSO*PALM DESERT CA 92260 Ownr:NORTHUP,JAMES Mail:PO BOX 8188*GREEN VALLEY LAKE CA 92341 Use:SINGLE RESIDENC Ph: Zn:R1 Sale:$27,000F Date:03/03/98 Loans:$21,600 Xmpt: Yb:1958 Sqft:836 Asd:$29,000 Imp:7096 Un:1 Doc#:74814 Tr: 00000-00 Lot: L-0113 Bdrms: 2 Bths: 1.0 Lotsz: 7,405 THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS SOURCED FROM PUBLIC DOCUMENTS AND IS NOT GUARANTEED Copyright (C) 1998 Acxiom Corporation DESERT CARPET AND TILE 73-241 Highway 111 3E Palm Desert CA 92260 (760) 56g-4109 9/1 7/99 Re: PASEO VILLAGE, a proposed continuing care retirement center Dear City Council: I am a Palm Desert resident and business owner and am familiar with the 3- story planned project at Fred Waring Drive and Fairhaven Drive. I understand the proposed height will exceed to some degree the current limits, but I think the project is well planned, much needed. I know there is some concern from neighbors to the North in rancho Mirage, but from the plans I have seen this project does not block any significant views and actually is less obstructed of views than if the building was constructed to current height limits. I also understand this project will generate no level of traffic that will cause problems on Fairhaven. With our aging population we need this project in our City. Please approve it as proposed. Thank You. Diane Ausilio, Owner r N m o c� virri -77 0 3�" 10429 Summer Holly Circle Angeles, Ca. 90077 )ber 1, 1999 RFCEF;VE tr + 4 1999 .Uai;UidiTY EEVELOPMiENT DEPAR T MEN'i Planning Commission &. City Council/City of Palm Desert AINDESERT 73510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 Re: Case Nos. GPA 99-3, C/Z 99-2, PP/CUP 99-7 and DA 99-3 Public Hearing October 14, 1999 Two legal Notices regarding the subject development. Sirs: Since 1979 we have been the continuous owners of a condominium in Monterey Sands addressed as 72845 Fleetwood Circle, Palm Desert, Ca. We have reviewed the subject development and wish to go on record as strongly objecting in any changes in City of Palm Desert guidlines as they apply to this development, including, but not limited to, changes in zoning, height limits, planned residen- tial units per acre and use. Overall, the project appears to be too dense and overbearing for the site. Thank you very much for taking this into consideration. You e y tr y, GC:ec Gle Cozen, al . i 9-29-99 Delivered by FAX to 760/341-7098 - 4 1999 To: Planning Commission &City Council/City of Palm Desert 73510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, CA 92260 Tel. #760/346-0611 LOM UNITYEEVELOPM NTDEPARTfaENI From: Dr. Harold Cozen Tel.#310/378-5976 CITY OF PALM DESERT 1600 Cataluna Place, Palos Verdes Estates, CA 90274 Re: Case Nos. GPA 99-3, C/Z 99-2, PP/CUP 99-7 and DA 99-3 Public Hearing October 14, 1999 Transmittal: This single page Message: I have received the second of two Legal Notices regarding the subject development. Since 1979, we have been the continuous owners of a condominium in Monterey Sands addressed as 72-808 Fleetwood Circle, Palm Desert. We have reviewed the subject development and wish to go on record as strongly objecting to any changes in City of Palm Desert guidelines as they apply to this development, including, but not limited to, changes in zoning, height limits, planned residential units per acre and use. Overall, the project appears to be too dense and overbearing for the site. Signature by fax is deemed equivalent to signature on original document. Signed: Harold Cozen Shirley J. Coz n PDMNT951-part THIS ORIGINAL FAX MAILED 9-30-99 r �� �J LAW OFFICES HARRINGTON, FOXX, DUBROW & CANTER, LLP ORANGE OFFICE ELI 8.DUBROW DAVID R.CATALINO 3 T" O R 1100 TOWN&COUNTRY ROAD 611 WEST SIXTH STR DAVID H.CANTER STEPHEN L.SMITH ���V 1'!�{�T� SUITE 1020 DALE 8.GOLDFARB MARK W.EISENBERG LOS ANGELES, CALII� I 18-31o1 ORANGE,CALIFORNIA 92868-4638 CRAIG F.SEARS BRAD M.ELDER TELEPHONE:(714)973-4595 MARTIN C.KRISTAI MICHAEL W.JACOBS TELEPHONE: 213)489-3222w FACSIMILE:(714)973-7923 EDWARD LEONARD K A. A.RAWERS • ♦ ~r 7� A(i 11 56 MARK A.JUHAS KELLY WARD FACSI • R 16 929 MARK W.FLORY ESTHER HOPKINS SAN DIEGO OFFICE WILLIAM P.FINNEY MARK W.NORMAN DIRECTI 1 LL6��2'//////4������158 401 WEST'A'STREET,SUITE 1150 THOMAS OE.. RUS ANN MICHAEL f1 OC THOMAS O.RUSSEII,III KIRK J.RETZ EMAIL: I t S OFFICE SAN TELEPHONE: NE:CALIFORNIA2 3.555 7903 HENRY A.WIRTA,JR. DANIEL E.KENNEY TELEPHONE:(619)233.5553 MICHAEL F.CRESSEY J.JASON HILL FACSIMILE:(619)233-0005 NANCY J.MINDEL HYDEE J.MULICHAK GARY G.DYE DEANN M.FLORES SAN FRANCISCO OFFICE JOHN C.DEWELL KEVIN P.MCNAMARA BETH ISAACS GOLUB EVAN C.NELSON 650 CALIFORNIA STREET,19TH FLOOR WILLIAM S.HART E.ANN PARRISH SAN FRANCISCO,CALIFORNIA 94108 FRAN4OIS R.FAVRE RASIKA K.DESILVA September29, 1999 TELEPHONE:(415)288.6600 SUSAN A.WATSON MARIANNE FRATIANNEFACSIMILE:(415)288.6618 KEVIN J.GRAY KENNETH H.LEE JEFFREY S.DOGGETT IAN W.MCCALLISTER EDWARD W.LUKAS,JR. KIMBERLY A.SANFORD RICHARD HUNT SAMPSON K.ERIN LENNEMANN KATHLEEN N.RAGER (1901.1952) ANGELA LUI WALSH KIM TUNG LOWELL L.DRYDEN (1909-1967) R.S.HARRINGTON (1913-1983) RICHARD A.FOXX (Retired) OUR FILE NO.: MCK The City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, California 92260 Re: Case No. GPA 99-3, C/Z99-2, PP/CUP99-7 & DA99-3 72-650 Fred Waring Drive and 72-755 Parkview Drive Gentlemen: The undersigned, an owner of property located at 72-793 Fleetwood Circle, Palm Desert, California are in receipt of that certain legal Notice regarding the appeal to a decision of the planning commission denying a request by Pearl Industries, Inc. for approval of a general plan amendment to add senior overlay,change of zone from PR-7 to PR-7S.O.,etc.regarding 13.04 acres on the west side of Fairhaven Drive between Fred Waring Drive and Parkview Drive, 72-650 Fred Waring and 72-755 Parkview Drive, Palm Desert, California. In connection therewith please be advised that I request that the Palm Desert City Council reject and/or deny the appeal to the decision of the Planning Commission in this matter for the following reasons: 1. The proposed project which requests an amendment to the general plan as well as changes in the existing zoning and height limitations is not in the best interests of the community and/or the immediately surrounding property owners. In such regard,the general plan and existing zoning for the City of Palm Desert was enacted after careful examination and study. To amend, alter or overturn such existing plan and zoning should require careful scrutiny and considerable evaluation of the consequences not only to neighboring property owners who have relied on the same but to the impact on city services and streets. Changes should not be made solely by reason of the needs of this project. F:\DOCS\IMICK\Personal\Palm Desert.001 f")"..) 11) . _ LAW OFFICES HARRINGTON, Foxx, DUBROW St CANTER, LLP The City of Palm Desert September 29, 1999 Page 2 2. The proposed project will substantially increase the density on this property thereby resulting in substantial additional traffic on nearby streets and use of public services. In particular, a substantially greater volume of cars and vehicles will be directed onto Parkview Drive, a primarily residential street. 3. The proposed project is not a residential type development but rather a business to be located and operated in a residential area. This is clearly against the best interests of neighboring property owners whose benefit and enjoyment of their property will be substantially impaired by this development. 4. The proposed height of the project exceeds existing height limitations and provides no reasonable basis for exceeding the same. In the event that the city council deems it appropriate to proceed with this development it is suggested that: 1. All entrances and exits to this property be eliminated from Parkview Drive to prevent added street traffic on a primarily residential street. 2. That the height of the project be lowered to comply with existing height limitations. 3. That the density of the proposed development be reduced to comply with existing zoning. 4. That the 99 bed skilled nursing facility be removed from the proposed plan in order that the project does in fact constitute a residential community and not a business. Your consideration of the comments made in this letter would be substantially appreciated. V• ,• 1 y s, MCK:prh Enclosure F:\DOCS\MCK\PERSONAL\Palm Desert.001 0 9