Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2025-02-26 CRPC Regular Meeting Agenda Packet CULTURAL RESOURCES PRESERVATION COMMITTEE CITY OF PALM DESERT MEETING AGENDA Wednesday, February 26, 2025 9:00 a.m. Administrative Conference Room, City Hall 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 Pursuant to Assembly Bill 2449, this meeting will be conducted as a hybrid meeting and there will be in-person access to this location. To participate via Zoom, use the following link: https://palmdesert.zoom.us/j/82890728644 or call (213) 338-8477, Zoom Meeting ID: 828 9072 8644 • Written public comment may also be submitted to cityclerk@palmdesert.gov. E-mails received by 5:00 p.m. the day prior to the meeting will be distributed to the Committee. Any correspondence received during or after the meeting will be distributed to the Committee as soon as practicable and retained for the official record. Emails will not be read aloud except as an ADA accommodation. • Pages 1.CALL TO ORDER 2.ROLL CALL 3.NONAGENDA PUBLIC COMMENTS This time has been set aside for the public to address the Cultural Resources Preservation Committee on issues that are not on the agenda for up to three minutes. Speakers may utilize one of the three options listed on the first page of the agenda. Because the Brown Act does not allow the Cultural Resources Preservation Committee to act on items not listed on the agenda, members may briefly respond or refer the matter to staff for a report and recommendation at a future meeting. 4.CONSENT CALENDAR All matters listed on the Consent Calendar are considered routine and may be approved by one motion. The public may comment on any items on the Consent Agenda within the three-minute time limit. Individual items may be removed by the Cultural Resources Preservation Committee for a separate discussion. RECOMMENDATION: To approve the consent calendar as presented. 4.a APPROVAL OF MINUTES 5 RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Minutes of October 23, 2024. 5.CONSENT ITEMS HELD OVER 6.ACTION CALENDAR The public may comment on individual Action Items within the three-minute time limit. Speakers may utilize one of the three options listed on the first page of the agenda. 7.PUBLIC HEARINGS 7.a CONSIDERATION OF A RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL TO DESIGNATE SANDPIPER CIRCLE 4 CONDOMINIUMS AS A HISTORIC LANDMARK DISTRICT (CRPC24-0005) 9 RECOMMENDATION: Make findings and recommend the City of Palm Desert City Council adopt a resolution to designate the Sandpiper Condominiums Circle 4, located south of El Paseo Drive on Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 640-230-002 through 640- 230-027, as a historic district pursuant to Criteria A and E in Palm Desert Municipal Code Section 29.50.010 (CRPC24-0005) 8.INFORMATIONAL REPORTS & COMMENTS 8.a CULTURAL RESOURCES PRESERVATION COMMITTEE MEMBERS 8.b CITY COUNCIL LIAISON 8.c CITY STAFF 8.d ATTENDANCE REPORT 57 9.ADJOURNMENT The next Regular Meeting will be held on March 26, 2025. Cultural Resources Preservation Committee Meeting February 26, 2025 2 10.PUBLIC NOTICES Agenda Related Materials: Pursuant to Government Code §54957.5(b)(2) the designated office for inspection of records in connection with this meeting is the Office of the City Clerk, Palm Desert Civic Center, 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert. Staff reports for all agenda items considered in open session, and documents provided to a majority of the legislative bodies are available for public inspection at City Hall and on the City’s website at www.palmdesert.gov. Americans with Disabilities Act: It is the intention of the City of Palm Desert to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) in all respects. If, as an attendee or a participant at this meeting, or in meetings on a regular basis, you will need special assistance beyond what is normally provided, the City will attempt to accommodate you in every reasonable manner. Please contact the Office of the City Clerk, (760) 346-0611, at least 48 hours prior to the meeting to inform us of your needs and to determine if accommodation is feasible. AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING I hereby certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing agenda for the Cultural Resources Preservation Committee was posted on the City Hall bulletin board and City website not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting. /S/ Monique Lomeli, CMC Senior Deputy Clerk Cultural Resources Preservation Committee Meeting February 26, 2025 3 4 1 CULTURAL RESOURCES PRESERVATION COMMITTEE CITY OF PALM DESERT REGULAR MEETING MINUTES October 23, 2024, 9:00 a.m. Present: Committee Member Paul Clark, Committee Member Don Graybill*, Committee Member Kim Housken, Committee Member David Toltzmann, Chair Rochelle McCune *Committee Member Graybill arrived at 9:02 a.m. Absent: Committee Member Thomas Mortensen, Vice-Chair Linda Vassalli Staff Present: Principal Planner Nick Melloni, Principal Planner Carlos Flores, Recording Secretary Michelle Nance Liaison(s) Present: City Council Liaison, Mayor Pro Tem Jan Harnik 1. CALL TO ORDER A Regular Meeting of the Cultural Resources Preservation Committee was called to order by Chair McCune on October 23, 2024, at 9:00 a.m., in the Administrative Conference Room, City Hall, located at 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California. 2. ROLL CALL 3. NON­AGENDA PUBLIC COMMENTS None. 4. CONSENT CALENDAR Motion by: Vice-Chair Housken Seconded by: Chair McCune To approve the consent calendar as presented. Motion Carried (4 to 0) 4.a APPROVAL OF MINUTES Motion by: Vice-Chair Housken Seconded by: Chair McCune Approve the Minutes of September 25, 2024. Motion Carried 5 2 5. CONSENT ITEMS HELD OVER None. 6. DISCUSSION/ACTION CALENDAR Committee Member Graybill arrived at this time. 6.a DISCUSS ITEMS REQUESTED BY CRPC FROM SEPTEMBER 25, 2024, MEETING Principal Planner Flores, introduced and lead discussions on the following topics; • Modernism Week 2026 presentation; • Educational topics; and • Mills Act updated guidelines. Feedback was provided, no formal action taken on this item. 7. PUBLIC HEARINGS None. 8. INFORMATIONAL REPORTS & COMMENTS 8.a CULTURAL RESOURCES PRESERVATION COMMITTEE MEMBERS City staff responded to inquiries regarding website design. 8.b CITY COUNCIL LIAISON Mayor Pro Tem Harnik expressed gratitude to the Committee for their continued support to the Community. 8.c CITY STAFF Principal Planner Flores, reminded the Committee that November and December meetings have been cancelled and a Special Meeting may be scheduled if business needs arise and provided an update on Avondale designation. 8.d ATTENDANCE REPORT Report provided; no action taken on this item. 9. ADJOURNMENT The Cultural Resources Preservation Committee adjourned at 9:58 a.m. Respectfully submitted, _________________________ Michelle Nance, Deptuy Clerk Recording Secretary 6 3 _________________________ Carlos Flores, Principal Planner Secretary _________________________ DATE APPROVED BY CRPC 7 8 Page 1 of 6 CULTURAL RESOURCES PRESERVATION COMMITTEE CITY OF PALM DESERT STAFF REPORT MEETING DATE: February 26, 2025 PREPARED BY: Carlos Flores, AICP, Principal Planner SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF A RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL TO DESIGNATE SANDPIPER CIRCLE 4 CONDOMINIUMS AS A HISTORIC LANDMARK DISTRICT (CRPC24-0005) RECOMMENDATION: Make findings and recommend the City of Palm Desert City Council adopt a resolution to designate the Sandpiper Condominiums Circle 4, located south of El Paseo Drive on Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 640-230-002 through 640-230-027, as a historic district pursuant to Criteria A and E in Palm Desert Municipal Code Section 29.50.010 (CRPC24-0005) BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The project is a request by Kerry Stern (Applicant) on behalf of Sandpiper to designate the existing Circle 4 Condominiums (Circle 4) located south of El Paseo, west of Highway 74, east of Edgehill Way, and North of Pitahaya Street, encompassing Assessors Parcel Numbers 640- 230-002 through 640-230-025 and 640-230-027, as a historic district. A total of eleven (11) out of 17 Circles within Sandpiper have received a historical designation, as summarized in Table 1 below. The Circles are ordered by the approximate order in which the building clusters were built. Table 1 – Sandpiper Historic Designation Summary Sandpiper Circle Number Designation Date Circle 1 4/14/2022 Circle 2 2/10/2022 Circle 3 2/10/2022 Circles 5-10 3/23/2017 Circles 11 & 12 5/23/2013 The Cultural Resources Preservation Committee (CRPC) is asked to make a recommendation of approval to the City Council to formally designate a historic district, pursuant to PDMC Chapter 29.50 Historic Districts. Project Description: The Applicant has submitted their nomination application (Attachment 1) which provides a detailed analysis on the proposed designation, complete with justification, historical documentation, findings, and photographs. A summary of the nomination application is below: 9 Cultural Resources Preservation Committee City of Palm Desert CRPC24-0005 Sandpiper Circle 4 Page 2 of 6 Definition The Sandpiper condominium complex (Complex) was developed with a total of 16 full circles and two half circles, originally designed and constructed from 1958-1960 (See Figure 1 below). Circle 4 was completed around 1960 and was meant to represent the start of a western expansion. The entirety of the Complex was constructed with a singular architectural vision where nearly every Circle was built simultaneously with similar materials and design. Figure 1 – Sandpiper Community Boundary The main reasoning behind the proposal is to include Circle 4 to the rest of the approved historic districts within the Complex, as summarized in Table 1. Circle 4 was built with a similar vision, architecture, and materials as the rest of the Complex. The nomination includes the common area, a large pool with a poolside community that is consistent amongst each individual circle within the Complex, and surrounding landscaping. Detached carports were a dded in the 1970s after the development’s 1960 completion and are not a part of this application. Physical Description Circle 4 is a part of the first Circles (1-4) that were originally built and are the only circles with triplexes. Circle 4 has horizontal lines, flat roofs, expansive amounts of glass, clerestory windows, and other characterizing features of mid-century modern architecture that is consistent with the rest of the Complex and with architecture practices of Palm Desert in its time period. Theme 10 Cultural Resources Preservation Committee City of Palm Desert CRPC24-0005 Sandpiper Circle 4 Page 3 of 6 A condominium complex with a “pin -wheel” green belt configuration is a critical theme of Circle 4 and the rest of the Complex, which is a concept derived from 19th century British planner Ebenezer Howard. Each Circle has a pool as a central hub and i s built to emulate a car-free environment with buildings fronting onto a green bel, and streets running along the perimeters instead of interiors, as shown in Figure 2 below. Figure 2 – Aerial View Circle 4 Significance As noted in the application, Palm Desert is known as a center of important mid-century architecture, and Circle 4 represents an excellent intact example of American Modernist architecture. Sandpiper Condominium Circle 4, completed in 1960 by the Los Angeles -based architectural firm of Palmer & Krisel, exhibits numerous stylistic markers that place them directly in the historic context of Palm Desert’s Modern Period. ANALYSIS: Pursuant to PDMC 29.20.010 Definitions, a “historic geographic district” means “any geographic area that possesses a concentration, linkage, or continuity of historic or cultural resources of which fifty percent or more of the total retain integrity and which have been designated as a historic district by the city council or is listed in a county, state or federal register.” The request for designation of any historic district may be initiated by any person, organization or entity and is subsequently referred to the CRPC for their recommendation to the City Council for a final determination. Per PDMC 29.50.010, a d istrict may be designated if it is determined that the district represents a significant and distinguishable entity that at the local level does any of the following: A. Exemplifies or reflects special elements of cultural, social, economic, political, aesthetic, engineering, architectural, or natural history; or B. Is identified with persons or events significant in history; or 11 Cultural Resources Preservation Committee City of Palm Desert CRPC24-0005 Sandpiper Circle 4 Page 4 of 6 C. Embodies distinctive characteristics of a style, type, period, or method of construction, or is a valuable example of the use of indigenous materials or craftsmanship; or D. Represents the work of master builders, designers, or architects; or E. Reflects distinctive examples of community planning or significant development patterns, including those associated with different eras of set tlement and growth, agricultural, or transportation; or F. Conveys a sense of historic and architectural cohesiveness through its design, setting, materials, workmanship or associations; or G. Is an archaeological, paleontological, botanical, geological, topographical, ecological, or geographical resource that has yielded or has the potential to yield important information in history or pre-history. All of the previously designated Circles within Sandpiper noted in Table 1 were designated based on Criteria A and Criteria E listed above. The Applicant has provided justification for approval based off each Criteria listed above, which the CRPC can consider. Staff is recommending approval of the proposed designation based off Criteria A and Criteria E,. A summary of analysis for Criteria A and Criteria E is listed below: Criteria A: Applicant’s Response: Sandpiper Circle 4 exemplifies excellent examples of Mid-Century Modern aesthetics, engineering and architecture. The project exemplifies special elements of culture, social, economic, aesthetic, and architecture, as outlined in the Application. Circle 4 represents an excellent intact example of American Modernist architecture. Sandpiper Condominium Circle 4, completed in 1960 by the Los Angeles-based architectural firm of Palmer & Krisel, exhibits numerous stylistic markers that place them directly in the historic context of Palm Desert’s Modern Period . Circle 4 has horizontal lines, flat roofs, expansive amounts of glass, clerestory windows, and other characterizing features of mid-century modern architecture that is consistent with the rest of the Complex. The Circle layout, complete with a centralized pool and a “pin -wheel” green belt configuration is a critical theme of Circle 4 and the rest of the Complex, which is a concept derived from 19th century British planner Ebenezer Howard. As noted, 11 other Circles within Sandpiper have previously been approved as historic districts based off Criteria A, and Circle #4 has all of the same architectural an d design components as those previously approved. 12 Cultural Resources Preservation Committee City of Palm Desert CRPC24-0005 Sandpiper Circle 4 Page 5 of 6 Criteria E: Applicant’s Response: The concept of a condominium, where the ownership of a building or property is a shared entity is a relatively modern phenomenon, although communal living is not. Th e first “condominium” was built in the United States in 1960 in Salt Lake City, Utah. The concept grew in popularity and by the end of the decade condominiums were present in all 50 states. The site planning at Sandpiper is a pin-wheel configuration around a central hub (in this case the pool) and its greenbelt concept draws from 19th century British planner Ebenezer Howard’s Garden City. Howard’s concept envisioned a world where the best of city and rural life is combined to create a utopian environment. He espoused the need for green belts, in an effort to reduce congestion and to create a healthy environment in which to live. Palmer & Krisel expands this idea by creating an environment free from cars, a popular symbol of urban distress. Their site planning re-examines not only urban but suburban living. Palmer & Krisel deftly sited all vehicular roads and carports on the perimeter of each circle. Their buildings turn their “fronts” away from the street. The “front porch” no longer faces the street but is moved to look onto the green belt. In this, the pool becomes the “new street scape”: the new social gathering place for the complex. Beginning in 1956 with their first Palm Springs tract, Twin Palms, Krisel, the firm's lead designer for desert houses, and Alexander Homes, the home developer used variation of orientation and roofline, integration of indoor and outdoor living, and careful use of standardized elements to make modernist design affordable enabling an affordable 2nd home for the escape from th e city. This popularized this post-and-beam architectural style in the Coachella Valley. Alexander houses and similar homes feature low-pitched roofs, wide eaves, open-beamed ceilings, and floor-to-ceiling windows. The houses facilitated indoor-outdoor living in the desert with sheltered patios and pools and in some cases breezeways clerestory windows improved air circulation while bringing light into the house. The interior designs included flexible room dividers to adapt the floor plan to the owners' preferences. The response provided by the Applicant provides satisfactory evidence towards meeting the requirements of Criteria E. Additionally, 11 other Circles within Sandpiper have previously been approved as historic districts based off Criteria E, and Circle #4 has all of the same components as those previously approved. Public Input Pursuant to the requirements of PDMC Section 25.40.060, a ten-day (10) notice of this hearing was posted in The Desert Sun on February 14, 2025, and mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the subject properties. At the time of preparation of this report, no comments were received. 13 Cultural Resources Preservation Committee City of Palm Desert CRPC24-0005 Sandpiper Circle 4 Page 6 of 6 Environment Review: Designation of a historic district is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15060(c)(2), the general exemption rule, of the CEQA Guidelines as the proposed project will not result in any foreseeable indirect change in the environment. The project is also exempt under CEQA Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) as the activity is not considered a project as defined under Guidelines Section 15378 as has no potential for resulting in any indirect or direct physical changes to the environment. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Sandpiper Circle #4 Nomination Application 2. Public Hearing Notice 14 1 Sandpiper Condominiums Circle 4 Historic District Nomination Prepared by Kerry Stern 2024 15 2 Acknowledgements The author would like to recognize the help and contributions of: Rebecca Xenos Darren Shay Rochelle McCune Christi Van Cleve Karen Porter and Sandpiper Condominiums 1, 2 and 3 for leading the way and sharing their applications And to architect William Krisel, AIA A pioneer of Mid-Century Modernism whose vision and determination made Sandpiper a reality. 16 3 Table of Contents Introduction 4 Historic District Cultural Resources Nomination Application 5 Historic District Cultural Resources Nomination Application—Expanded Entries 7 1. Definition 7 2. Boundary Description 7 3. Boundary Justification 8 4. Physical Description (and History) 8 5. Theme 9 6. Period of Significance 9 7. Narrative of Statement of Significance 10 8. Additional Information 11 A. Bibliography 11 B. Other Sources 12 C. Photographs 12 Appendix A. Action Items 13 Appendix B. Sandpiper Condominiums Circle 4 APNs 14 Appendix C. Sandpiper Condominiums Tract Map Circle 4 15 Appendix D. Krisel Site Plan Circle 4 16 Appendix E. Sandpiper Community Map 17 Appendix F. Integrity Analysis 18 Appendix G. Specific Responses to Historic District Designation 21 Appendix H. Historical Documentation 26 Appendix I. Floor Plans and Unit Photos 30 Appendix J. Pool and Ramada 33 Appendix K. Grounds 35 Appendix L. Historic Olive Trees 37 Appendix M. Decorative Concrete Block 38 17 4 Introduction On April 6, 2023, the board of directors of the Palm Springs Garden Apartments #4, commonly known as Circle 4, voted to seek historic designation through the City of Palm Desert. (Appendix A). An Ad-Hoc Committee was appointed to pursue the application on behalf of the Association. A motion was made to appoint owners Christi Van Cleve, Karen Porter and Rebecca Xenos to the committee. Due to extenuating circumstances, this committee was unable to complete the project. On June 22, 2024, the Board appointed Kerry Stern to complete the historic portion of the application. This nomination seeks to have the City designate Sandpiper Condominiums Circle 4 with historic status, joining the existing Historic District #4 which already encompasses the rest of the Sandpiper Condominiums complex. Circles 1-4 of Sandpiper Condominiums, constructed between 1958 and 1960, saw architect William Krisel create a template for affordable, modernist architecture in a desert environment that would earn him national acclaim. The design elements and language that Krisel developed in the original four circles would go on to be utilized in the design of subsequent Circles as they were built out in the 1960’s. Sandpiper Circle 4 has been part of several modern home tours, including those conducted during Modernism Week. “To WINTER in the desert playground of the Palm Springs area has been the dream of all who know California. Now the dream can come true in a simple and interesting manner. On the highway at Palm Desert, midway between Palm Springs and Indio, is The Sandpiper –the ultimate in desert living…these luxury homes, built on an own-your-own basis are now well into their fourth cluster. They provide every privacy and every facility from beautiful enclosed patio gardens to built-in electric kitchens—all combined with the finest in resort hotel service and maintenance. Without a care in the world one may revel in desert sunshine, invigorating clear air, in interesting mountains and wide stretches of golden sand.” Pictorial California, 1960 18 5 19 6 20 7 Historic District Cultural Resources Nomination Application—Expanded Entries 1. Definition There are 17 Circles within the Sandpiper Condominium complex with sixteen full Circles (each with a pool) and two half Circles (each with a pool). In Circles 1 through 4, the original Sandpiper Circles designed by Palmer & Krisel (1958-1960), three attached condominium units comprised a building, and eight buildings comprised a Circle. The units are typically mirror images of each other joined at the common wall, with some minor variations designed to add visual interest such as varying heights in the original four Circles. The Circle numbers indicated the approximate order in which the building clusters were built. Circle 4 was completed around 1960 and represented the start of a western expansion. The ramada was in a triangular shape and was skillfully placed into the landscape. Many of the Sandpiper owners by now were coming from Southern California and using their units as weekend getaways. The Sandpiper was no longer limited to winter use as originally conceived. 2. Boundary Description The Sandpiper Condominium complex is located south of El Paseo Drive, west of California Route 74, east of Edgehill Way and north of Pitahaya Street. Primary entrances to each complex are on El Paseo Drive. Currently, the City’s Historic District #4 comprises Sandpiper Condominiums Circles 1, 2, 3, 5-10 and 11-12. Circles 5-10 and 11 and 12 are in the center of the Sandpiper Condominium Complex. This nomination proposes that Sandpiper Condominiums Circle 4 be added into the Historic District #4. Sandpiper Condominiums Circle 4 is adjacent to Circle 1 (North), Circle 2 (East) and Circle 3 (South). Circles 5-10 are located west of Circle 4. Access to the circle is through the most eastern Gate F off of El Paseo Drive. The specific Assessor Parcel Numbers (APNS) contained in Sandpiper Condominiums Circle 4 are sited in Appendix.B and in total constitute a legal description of the 21 8 proposed new addition to the Sandpiper Historic District #4 and, by extension, the new boundaries of the district. 3. Boundary Justification This nomination is specifically written to include Circle 4 of the Sandpiper Condominium. Unlike some historic districts, which can contain a variety of architectural styles built over an extended period, the Sandpiper Condominium complex represents a concentrated architectural vision with the buildings in each Circle constructed nearly simultaneously, of the same materials, deliberately sited in a coherent plan. Circle 4 is an intrinsic part of this common architectural vision. Included in this historic district nomination is the common area, or courtyard, which is surrounded by the buildings of Circle 4. A pool is in the center of the common area. The pool is surrounded by a large accessible area of landscaping, which serves as a buffer between the pool and the units. A poolside community Ramada was an important part of the original design. The detached carports were added in the 1970s well after the development’s completion in 1960 and are not a part of the application for historic status. 4. Physical Description (and History) Circle 4 is part of the first Circles (1 through 4) designed and constructed of the Sandpiper Condominiums. They were originally built as cooperatives by the construction company of George M. Holstein and Sons along with the Western Land and Capital Company. The architectural firm of Palmer and Krisel was brought on to design the initial phase (Circle 1) of Sandpiper Condominiums and construction was completed in 1958. While Krisel was directly responsible for the designs of Circles 1-14 of the entire Sandpiper complex, Circles 1-4 were the only ones which were triplexes, the rest being duplexes. Circle 4 was completed around 1960. The triplex units are typically mirror images of two styles, Y and X, Y being the taller clerestory window and X the lower roof line, with some minor variations designed to add visual interest such as varying heights in the original four Circles. Each 3-unit pod has 3 different types of kitchens, round (Unit A), square (Unit B) and rectangular (Unit C). The specific Riverside County Assessment Number PIN (Property Identification Numbers) are included in Appendix B for Circle 4. Sandpiper Condominiums Circle 4 is indicative of Mid-Century Modern Architecture because it’s distinctive characteristics such as horizontal lines, flat roofs, expansive amounts of glass, clerestory windows, passive solar features, use of inexpensive, machine-produced materials, masonry, innovative fixtures and state of the art 22 9 appliances echoed that trending style. These embodied the building practices in Palm Desert and the Coachella Valley that were applied to such projects in the 50’ and 60’s. These came on the heels of the earlier Bauhaus and themes and were explored in the Case House Studies of 1945 until 1966. Circle 4 uses the myriads of the concrete block patterns developed specifically for this project. While concrete block was used extensively in construction at this time this block was exclusively designed to set the design theme of the Sandpiper Krisel approach. These distinct designs were personally designed by Krisel himself. Uses of concrete feature block, commercially known as “Shadowal,” and a pierced concrete screen block. 5. Theme The concept of a condominium, where the ownership of a building or property is a shared entity is a modern phenomenon, although communal living is not. The first “condominium” was built in the United States in 1960 in Salt Lake City, Utah. The concept grew in popularity and by the end of the decade condominiums were present in all fifty states. The site planning at Sandpiper is a pin-wheel configuration around a central hub (in this case the pool) and its greenbelt concept draws from 19th century British planner Ebenezer Howard’s Garden City. Howard’s concept envisioned a world where the best of city and rural life is combined to create a utopian environment. He espoused the need for green belts, to reduce congestion and to create a healthy environment in which to live. Palmer & Krisel expands Howard’s tenet by creating an environment free from cars, a popular symbol of urban distress. Their site planning re-examines not only urban but suburban living. Palmer & Krisel deftly sited all vehicular roads and carports on the perimeter of each circle. Their buildings turn their “fronts” away from the street. The “front porch” no longer faces the street but is moved to look onto the green belt. In this, the pool becomes the “new street scape”: the new social gathering place for the complex. 6. Period of Significance The relatively short history of Palm Desert can be organized into three more or less distinct periods that include Prehistory, the Settlement Period, and the Modern Period. It is within the context of the last period that this building will be evaluated. Modern Period (1925-1960s): Located in the central portion of the Coachella Valley, Palm Desert was first developed as an agricultural area of date farms. The Modern 23 10 Period can be considered to have begun with the construction of Coachella Valley’s first “modern” structure, the Paul and Betty Popenoe Cabin designed in 1922 by the Austrian-born American modernist architect Rudolph Schindler (1887-1953). With this building, the area’s then predominant architectural style based on Mexican and Spanish Colonial motifs began to change. The Historical Society of Palm Desert succinctly describes the pre-war and wartime history of the city as follows: In the 1930s a few homes were built and lots sold in a development north of Highway 111 called Palm Village. World War II brought General Patton to Portola Avenue and to the Colorado Desert to train for African warfare; but no one ever dreamed this would become a world-class destination resort. After the conclusion of World War II, tourist-based development began to replace agriculture. The first large-scale development was marked by the opening of Shadow Mountain Resort built by the Henderson brothers (Cliff, Randall, Phil, and Carl). This was f ollowed by development of the “El Paseo” commercial strip, which was a former army maintenance camp. Soon afterwards, Palm Desert quickly developed into a resort destination in parallel with its neighbors Palm Springs and Rancho Mirage. Palm Desert, along with neighboring Palm Springs and Rancho Mirage, are together internationally known as a center of important midcentury architecture. The buildings and site that constitute Sandpiper Condominiums represents an excellent intact example of American Modernist architecture. This midcentury architecture may therefore be viewed as a key component of the historic trend that has come to define the Coachella Valley and one that exemplifies a particular period of the nation, state, or local history. 7. Narrative of Statement of Significance Sandpiper Condominium Circle 4, completed in 1960 by the Los Angeles-based architectural firm of Palmer & Krisel, exhibits numerous stylistic markers that place them directly in the historic context of Palm Desert’s Modern Period. Further, Circle 4 is an excellent example of multi-family residential development in Palm Desert in the mid- 1960s. The 24 units and 8 buildings that comprise Circle 4 reflects a coherent vision of modernist architecture rarely found anywhere else in the United States. The siting of the buildings in Circle 4, and the landscape architecture further reinforce a coherent modernist architectural vision that successfully created a leisure lifestyle of “carefree desert living.” Sandpiper Condominium Circle 4 is significant under the theme of Modern Architecture because it possesses distinctive characteristics that make up the many qualities of the 24 11 style, such as overall horizontality, flat roofs, expansive amounts of glass, clerestory windows, use of inexpensive, machine-produced materials, and masonry. Together, the structures and site are an excellent illustration of their type or period of construction and an important example (within its context) of building practices in Palm Desert and the Coachella Valley at midcentury. Adding to the significance of the Sandpiper Condominium complex, in the late 1950s, and onward, the architectural firm of Palmer & Krisel was quickly recognized as a firm that paid careful attention to the requirements of builders. Specifically, they were remarkably successful in solving the problem of producing superior design while still meeting tight project budgets. This economic system allowed cheaper units which launched the affordable ‘second home’ trend in Southern California. This was a welcome escape from the winter fogs of the coast and the hectic Los Angeles life. Modern highways were being constructed which drastically cut the travel time. In the mid-1950s, Palmer & Krisel began to receive substantial professional recognition for their already burgeoning body of work. This recognition ranged from awards bestowed by the local Southern California chapter of the American Institute of Architects to recognition from the influential National Association of Homebuilders. The firm was also listed as one of the “top 100 firms in the nation” by the seminal Progressive Architecture magazine. The Los Angeles-based firm Palmer & Krisel produced a large and diverse body of work including housing tracts, office high-rises and shopping centers. In all, 40,000 housing units were produced by the firm. 8. Additional Information A. Bibliography Chavkin, Dan. Unseen Midcentury Desert Modern. 2016 Coquelle, Aline. Palm Springs Style. 2005 Faibyshev, Dolly. Palm Springs: Mid-Century Modern. 2010 Kaplan, Wendy. Los Angeles County Museum of Art. California Design 1930-1965: Living in a Modern Way. 2011 Menrad, Chris, ed. William Krisel’s Palm Springs: The Language of Modernism. 2016 Mid Mod Mango website. The Lasting Impact of Mid-Century Architect William Krissel. February 18, 2018 Morazzi, Peter. Palm Springs Paradise: Vintage Photographs from America’s Desert Playground. 2015 Pictorial California, 1960 Roth, Leland M. American Architecture: a history. 2016 Street-Porter, Tim. Palm Springs: A Modernist Paradise. 2018 Sandpiper Palm Desert 1958-1969. Historical Society of Palm Desert. 2013 25 12 B. Other Sources City of Palm Desert website Palm Desert Historical Society Riverside County Assessor’s Office Sandpiper Circle 1 Nomination, 2021 Sandpiper Circle 2 Nomination, 2021 Sandpiper Circle 3 Nomination, 2021 C. Photographs Required documentation photographs of Sandpiper Circle 4 and miscellaneous historical photographs and advertisements are contained in the nomination packet. 26 13 Appendix A. Action Items PALM SPRINGS GARDEN APARTMENTS #4 MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS APRIL 6, 2023 AT 1:00 P.M. THE MEETING WAS HELD AT THE CHISHOLM RESIDENCE Historic Designation Process President Chisholm announced the Board’s intent to seek Historic Designation through the City of Palm Desert. It was noted that Circle 4 is the only Circle that has not sought designation to date. Discussion ensued regarding potential benefits to the Association with the designation, such as tax incentives that may be enjoyed by some owners, as well as the possibility of increased property values. President Chisholm then requested a show of hands of owners present at the meeting that are interested in pursuing Historic Designation for the Association; 14 owners present were in favor and one was opposed. A motion was then made by Paul Chisholm to proceed as an Association with the application process to obtain the Historic Designation through the City of Palm Desert. The motion was seconded by Art Schneidt and carried. The Board then discussed the process, and it was agreed that an Ad-Hoc Committee of members should be appointed to handle the administration needed to pursue the designation on behalf of the Association. Following discussion, a motion was made by Art Schneidt to appoint owners Christi Van Cleve, Karen Porter and Rebecca Xenos to the Ad-Hoc Committee to pursue Historic Designation on behalf of the Association. The motion was seconded by Paul Chisholm and carried. 27 14 Appendix B. Sandpiper Condominiums Circle 4 APNs The specific Riverside County Assessment Number PIN (Property Identification Numbers) are as follows: Unit Address PIN/APN 411 Sandpiper St 640-230-024 412 Sandpiper St 640-230-023 413 Sandpiper St 640-230-025 421 Sandpiper St 640-230-021 422 Sandpiper St 640-230-020 423 Sandpiper St 640-230-022 431 Sandpiper St 640-230-016 432 Sandpiper St 640-230-015 433 Sandpiper St 640-230-014 441 Sandpiper St 640-230-010 442 Sandpiper St 640-230-009 443 Sandpiper St 640-230-008 451 Sandpiper St 640-230-005 452 Sandpiper St 640-230-006 453 Sandpiper St 640-230-007 461 Sandpiper St 640-230-002 462 Sandpiper St 640-230-004 463 Sandpiper St 640-230-003 471 Sandpiper St 640-230-012 472 Sandpiper St 640-230-013 473 Sandpiper St 640-230-011 481 Sandpiper St 640-230-019 482 Sandpiper St 640-230-018 483 Sandpiper St 640-230-017 Circle 4 Common Area 640-230-027 28 15 Appendix C. Sandpiper Condominiums Tract Map Circle 4 29 16 Appendix D. Krisel Site Plan Circle 4 30 17 Appendix E. Sandpiper Community Map Aerial View of Circle 4 31 18 Appendix F. Integrity Analysis INTEGRITY This is the ability of a property to convey its significance. To be listed in the local registry, a property must not only be shown to be significant under the criteria, but also must have integrity. The evaluation of integrity is sometimes a subjective judgment, but it must always be grounded in an understanding of a property's physical features and how they relate to its significance. Historic properties either retain integrity (that is, convey their significance) or they do not. The definition of integrity includes seven aspects or qualities. To retain historic integrity a property will always possess several, and usually most, aspects. The retention of specific aspects of integrity is paramount for a property to convey its significance. Determining which of these aspects are most important to a particular property requires knowing why, where, and when the property is significant. The following sections define the seven aspects and explain how they combine to produce integrity. LOCATION Location is the place where a historic property was constructed or the place where an historic event occurred. The relationship between the property and its location is often important to understanding why the property was created or why something happened. The actual location of a historic property, complemented by its setting, is particularly important in recapturing the sense of historic events and people. Except in rare cases, the relationship between a property and its historic associations is destroyed if the property is moved. Sandpiper Condominiums Circle 4 remains in its original location and therefore qualifies under this aspect. DESIGN Design is the combination of elements that create the form, plan, space, structure, and style of a property. It results from conscious decisions made during the original conception and planning of a property and applies to activities as diverse as community planning, engineering, architecture, and landscape architecture. Design includes such elements as organization of space, proportion, scale, technology, ornamentation, and materials. A property’s design reflects historic functions and technologies as well as aesthetics. It includes such considerations as the structural system; massing; arrangement of spaces; pattern of fenestration; textures and colors of surface materials; type, amount, and style of ornamental detailing. Although the units and site of Sandpiper Condominiums Circle 4 has seen some alterations, the essential characteristics of form, plan, space, structure and style have survived intact. 32 19 SETTING Setting is the physical environment of a historic property. Whereas location refers to the specific place where a property was built or an event occurred, setting refers to the character of the place in which the property played its historical role. It involves how, not just where the property is situated, and its relationship to surrounding features and open space. Setting often reflects the basic physical conditions under which a property was built and the functions it was intended to serve. In addition, the way in which a property is positioned in its environment can reflect the designer’s concept of nature and aesthetic preferences. The setting of the Sandpiper Condominiums Circle 4 continues to reflect the architects’ original design relationship of site and structure. MATERIALS Materials are the physical elements that were combined or deposited during a particular period and in a particular pattern or configuration to form a historic property. The choice and combination of materials reveals the preferences of those who created the property and indicates the availability of types of materials and technologies. As mentioned previously, while some of the Sandpiper Condominiums Circle 4 exterior surface materials have been painted, this change does not constitute a significant loss of the physical elements that expressed the design during the building’s period of significance. WORKMANSHIP Workmanship is the physical evidence of the crafts of a particular culture or people during any given period in history or prehistory. It is evidence of artisans’ labor and skill in constructing or altering a building, structure, object, or site. Workmanship can apply to the property as a whole or to its individual components. It can be expressed in vernacular methods of construction and plain finishes or in highly sophisticated configurations and ornamental detailing. It can be based on common traditions or innovative period techniques. Workmanship is important because it furnishes evidence of the technology of a craft, illustrates the aesthetic principles of a historic or prehistoric period, and reveal individual, local, regional, or national applications of both technological practices and aesthetic principles. Examples of workmanship in historic buildings include tooling, carving, painting, graining, turning, and joinery. Within the buildings of Sandpiper Condominiums Circle 4, the workmanship is comprised of integral ornamental detailing reflected in concrete block, glass and aluminum. The property continues to express a high degree of contemporary period workmanship. FEELING Feeling is a property’s expression of the aesthetic or historic sense of a particular period. It results from the presence of physical features that, taken together, convey the property’s historic character. For example, a rural historic district retaining original design, materials, workmanship, and setting will relate to the feeling of agricultural life in the 19th century. When constructed, Sandpiper Condominiums Circle 4 catered to the aspiring upper middle 33 20 class. As such the “feeling” of the buildings necessarily had to exude urbanity albeit it in a more informal resort location. The late 1950s were a sophisticated, open and optimistic time, a feeling still expressed by the design of this building. Accordingly, Sandpiper Condominiums Circle 4 retains the integrity of feeling. ASSOCIATION Association is the direct link between an important historic event or person and a historic property. A property retains association if it is the place where the event or activity occurred and is sufficiently intact to convey that relationship to an observer. Like feeling, association requires the presence of physical features that convey a property’s historic character. For example, a Revolutionary War battlefield whose natural and man-made elements have remained intact since the 18th century will retain its quality of association with the battle. Because feeling and association depend on individual perceptions, their retention alone is never sufficient to support eligibility of a property for the National Register. As previously stated in this nomination, Sandpiper Condominiums Circle 4 is an important example of midcentury residential development in Palm Desert. The buildings and site represent the city’s overall residential development from the 1950s to the 1960s. Accordingly, it continues its association with a pattern of events that have made a meaningful contribution to the community. INTEGRITY SUMMARY: Sandpiper Condominiums Circle 4 appears to be in excellent condition due largely to the use of construction materials suitable for the harsh desert environment. This integrity analysis confirms that the buildings and site of Circle 4 still possess all seven aspects of integrity. While the buildings have undergone numerous minor alterations since construction and some have been enlarged, virtually all the character-defining features survive. The buildings and site retain a high degree of integrity sufficient to qualify them for inclusion in Historic District #4. 34 21 Appendix G. Specific Responses to Historic District Designation Sandpiper Condominiums Circle 4 meets most of the “Historic District Designation Criteria” from Palm Desert Municipal Code Section 29.50.010. A. It exemplifies or reflects special elements of cultural, social, economic, political, aesthetic, engineering, architectural or natural history; or Sandpiper Circle 4 exemplifies excellent examples of Mid-Century Modern aesthetics, engineering and architecture. B. Is identified with persons or events significant in history; or The Post-World War 2 economic boon signaled a life style change rarely seen in history. Massed produced cars, along with cheap gas and oil products, the massive road projects, technical innovations were created during the war. The production new materials, and vast areas of open real estate would change the fabric of the United States. This was the handwriting on the wall as to what was in store for the Southern California cityscape. Water was being brought in to once arid land. Mass produced housing, suburbia and modern city planning, tract housing and a recreational economy with second homes, coffee shops, and resorts was to become the new norm. City shapes would change forever. C. Embodies distinctive characteristics of a style, type, period, or method of construction or is a valuable example of the use of indigenous materials or craftsmanship; or Roof planks became ceilings with exposed beams serving decoratively. Walls that were merely room dividers or screens allowed in more light while making construction of a fullframed wall unnecessary. Forgoing molding and trim created a contemporary look and saved time and money. Open concepts, indoor/outdoor. Minimal amount of lumber, post and beam construction, flat roofs, large sliding glass doors, clerestory windows, aluminum sash, refrigerated air, matched electrical appliances, modern décor, space age kitchens, swimming pools with dramatic angles, exterior walls of concrete steps, varying roof heights, sun-flaps, putting greens, desert and ‘tropical’ planting. Siting for passive solar was becoming recognized for its value in building in inhospitable climates such as the desert. 35 22 D. Represents the work of master builders, designers, or architects; or The now-iconic Modern Style was started by German architects and designers who immigrated to the United States post-World War II. The mid-century modern movement in the U.S. was an American reflection of the International and Bauhaus movements, including the works of Gropius, Florence Knoll, Le Corbusier and Ludwig Mies van der Rohe. Although the American component was slightly more organic in form and less formal than the International Style, it is more firmly related to it than any other. Brazilian and Scandinavian architects were also very influential at this time, with a style characterized by clean simplicity and integration with nature. Mid-century architecture was frequently employed in residential structures with the goal of bringing modernism into America's post- war suburbs. Frank Lloyd Wright, Walter Gropius and other master designers/architects tried to bring Modern home design to the masses, but their projects were never constructed on a large scale. To find a midcentury architect who actually brought clean, dramatic design to the middle class, we should look instead to someone like William Krisel, University of Southern California (’49)-trained architect. In an interview, Krisel describes USC in 1945 as a training ground for “a very Modern school.” The site planning at Sandpiper is a pin- wheel configuration around a central hub (in this case the pool) and its greenbelt concept draws from 19th century British planner Ebenezer Howard’s Garden City. Howard’s concept envisioned a world where the best of city and rural life is combined to create a utopian environment. He espoused the need for green belts, in an effort to reduce congestion and to create a healthy environment in which to live. Palmer & Krisel expands Howard’s tenet by creating an environment free from cars, a popular symbol of urban distress. Their site planning re-examines not only urban but suburban living. Palmer & Krisel deftly sited all vehicular roads and carports on the perimeter of each circle. Their buildings turn their “fronts” away from the street. The “front porch” no longer faces the street but is moved to look onto the green belt. In this, the pool becomes the “new street scape”: the new social gathering place for the complex. Although not labeled a master builder, designer or architect, his herculean effort to bring modern home design to the forefront in Southern California, particularly in the Palm Springs area, should be recognized. In the 1950s Krisel helped to nearly double the size of Palm Springs by building 2,500 tract homes that still exist today. He brought over 40,000 total to the greater Southern California area thus cementing the Modern Style to be synonymous with California Style In 1957, The Case Study House series began to showcase homes commissioned by the magazine, Arts and Architecture, and designed by some of the most influential designers and architects of the era in Southern California, including Charles and Ray Eames, Richard Neutra, Pierre Koenig, and Ed Killingsworth. The residences were intended to be relatively 36 23 affordable, replicable houses for post-World War II family living, with an emphasis on “new materials and new techniques in house construction’, much of these gleaned from a recently completed world war. John Entenza of Arts and Architecture invited William Krisel to participate in the Case Study Houses but Krisel could not find any enthusiastic clients at that time. Palmer and Krisel would have been much more well known if they had a house in this project. Julius Shulman would say “He would have been a valued contributor to this.” In reality, Krisel did more to spread the ‘spirit’ of the Case Study House Study by providing affordable mass housing sleekly designed with the modern ethos intact. His first, the Corbin Palms in Woodland Hills, in collaboration with Alexander Construction, brought mass produced sleek urban living to Southern California for one of the first times in a suburb 26 miles from the LA center, unheard of at the time. Krisel actually lived in this tract and commuted to his office in Beverly Hill, a pattern that would become more prevalent as the cities of Southern California grew and matured. Again, according to architectural photographer Julius Shulman, “What Bill Krisel did was bring Modernism to the masses. Krisel packed excellent architecture into houses of modest size, made of modest materials, and he did it on a very thin dime.” At the time, he said, the American Institute of Architects frowned on mass-produced housing, considering the work “not prestigious enough.” Krisel and a handful of others, such as Ain and Eichler, made their names by bringing innovative style to tract developments, a part of the business shunned by the architecture establishment. These prolific Modernists are only lately getting the attention they deserve. “Krisel spoke the language of builders,” says Palm Springs architecture historian Robert Imber. “He understood that the way to their heart was through their wallet.” Krisel analyzed every detail of construction and produced ideas that assured creative license for him and made money for the builder by keeping costs down. “Roof planks became ceilings with exposed beams serving decoratively,” Imber says. “Walls that were merely room dividers or screens allowed in more light while making construction of a full-framed wall unnecessary. Forgoing molding and trim created a contemporary look and saved time and money.” Another Krisel hallmark: He always designed more than the actual building. He created berms, steps, walkways and other hardscaping to balance and enhance his structures. He personally selected all plant material. At USC, Krisel had studied landscape architecture with the legendary Garrett Eckbo. One of the best places to see his merging of architecture and landscape architecture is in the 45-acre Sandpiper Complex. It has remained largely unaltered, making it one of the largest concentrations of intact midcentury architecture anywhere. 37 24 Handling both the architecture and landscape architecture fits Krisel’s philosophy that an architect should take full responsibility for the total design. “The interior and exterior are all really one entity and shouldn’t be done by two different people,” he says. Alan Hess asked the architect if he could explain why Modern design has flourished for more than half a century. Krisel made it clear that Modern Design will continue to do so. “Modernism is not a style, it’s a language,” Krisel declared. “And languages don’t die out; they adapt.” E. Reflects distinctive examples of community planning or significant development patterns, including those associated with different eras of settlement and growth, agricultural, or transportation; or The concept of a condominium, where the ownership of a building or property is a shared entity is a relatively modern phenomenon, although communal living is not. The first “condominium” was built in the United States in 1960 in Salt Lake City, Utah. The concept grew in popularity and by the end of the decade condominiums were present in all 50 states. The site planning at Sandpiper is a pin- wheel configuration around a central hub (in this case the pool) and its greenbelt concept draws from 19th century British planner Ebenezer Howard’s Garden City. Howard’s concept envisioned a world where the best of city and rural life is combined to create a utopian environment. He espoused the need for green belts, in an effort to reduce congestion and to create a healthy environment in which to live. Palmer & Krisel expands this idea by creating an environment free from cars, a popular symbol of urban distress. Their site planning re-examines not only urban but suburban living. Palmer & Krisel deftly sited all vehicular roads and carports on the perimeter of each circle. Their buildings turn their “fronts” away from the street. The “front porch” no longer faces the street but is moved to look onto the green belt. In this, the pool becomes the “new street scape”: the new social gathering place for the complex. Beginning in 1956 with their first Palm Springs tract, Twin Palms, Krisel, the firm's lead designer for desert houses, and Alexander Homes, the home developer used variation of orientation and roofline, integration of indoor and outdoor living, and careful use of standardized elements to make modernist design affordable enabling an affordable 2nd home for the escape from the city. This popularized this post-and-beam architectural style in the Coachella Valley. Alexander houses and similar homes feature low-pitched roofs, wide eaves, open-beamed ceilings, and floor-to-ceiling windows. The houses facilitated indoor-outdoor living in the desert with sheltered patios and pools and in some cases breezeways clerestory windows improved air circulation while bringing light into the house. 38 25 The interior designs included flexible room dividers to adapt the floorplan to the owners' preferences. F. Conveys a sense of historic and architectural cohesiveness through its design, setting, materials, workmanship or associations.” Architect William Krisel of the firm of Palmer & Krisel, has long been given credit for the design and much of the on-site supervision of the Sandpiper Condominium complex. Krisel viewed the architect’s job as being that of the “master designer” responsible for designing projects that were comfortable, cost-effective and memorable. Krisel also believed that architects should have respect for the modernist masters and the principles they espoused, Including a site plan that created a “built-environment” that attempted to combine the best of city and rural life in a utopian environment. G. “Is an archaeological, paleontological, botanical, geological topographical ecological or geographical resource that has yield or has the potential to yield important information in history or pre-history.” This criterion does not apply to this nomination. DESIGNATION CRITERIA SUMMARY: The foregoing evaluation finds Sandpiper Condominiums Circle 4 (both buildings and site) eligible for listing as a Historic District Under Palm Desert Municipal Code Section 29.50.010 paragraphs A, B, C, D, E and F. Additionally, the buildings and site retain a high degree of integrity. 39 26 Appendix H. Historical Documentation Front page news coverage of Sandpiper project announcement (Desert Sun, March 21, 1958) 40 27 Sandpiper advertisement circa 1960 41 28 Sandpiper advertisement circa 1960 42 29 Postcard circa 1960 "These picturesque apartment units a few miles east of Palm Springs provide a perfect winter retreat where one can enjoy the warm winter sun and the lush desert living." 43 30 Appendix I. Floor P lans and Unit Photos Circle 4 "A" Unit Floor Plan Unit 441 44 31 Circle 4 "B" Unit Floorplan Unit 442 45 32 Circle 4 "C" Unit Floorplan Unit 483 46 33 Appendix J. Pool and Ramada 47 34 48 35 Appendix K. Grounds 49 36 50 37 Appendix L. Historic Olive Trees “I don’t think of landscape architecture as a separate activity. I would no more ignore that aspect of design or pass it to someone else than I would leave out the climate control or plumbing.” William Krisel For William Krisel, the harmony of the exterior landscape and gardens with architecture and interior spaces was critical. When looking at the site plan for Circle 4 (Appendix D) a variety of trees, shrubbery, ground cover, and hardscape can be seen. Within the circle, one Olea Europa (European Olive Tree) was placed near each of the eight C units. Four of those original trees have survived and still add to the harmony of the exterior landscape. Unit 473 Unit 423 Unit 433 Unit 483 51 38 Appendix M. Decorative Concrete Block "Decorative concrete block walls were used extensively. The blocks had sculpted patterns and cutouts, and were sometimes indented for further effect when placed. Palmer & Krisel actively configured the detailed placement of many of these patterns for the Sandpiper. The Superlite Concrete Block Company of Calipatria (in the Salton Sea area) supplied the newly designed block, which was named Shadowal." William Krisel's Palm Springs: The Language of Modernism. 2016, edited by Chris Menrad Unit 461 52 39 Unit 443 Unit 462 53 40 Unit 441 Unit 423 54 C I T Y O F P A L M D E S E R T 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260-2578 TEL: 760-776-6483 PLANNING@PALMDESERT.GOV CITY OF PALM DESERT PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE CASE NO. CRPC24-0005 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BEFORE THE CULTURAL RESOURCE PRESERVATION COMMITTEE OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, TO CONSIDER A RECOMMENDATION TO THE PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL FOR THE DESIGNATION OF SANDPIPER CONDOMINIUMS CIRCLE 4, LOCATED SOUTH OF EL PASEO DRIVE AND WEST OF HIGHWAY 74, AS A HISTORIC DISTRICT The City of Palm Desert (City), in its capacity as the Lead Agency for this project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), has determined that the proposed historic landmark district designation is not subject to CEQA pursuant to Guidelines Section 15060(C)(2) and 15060(C)(3) as the project will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment and is not a Project as defined by Section 15378. PROJECT LOCATION: South of El Paseo Drive, west of Highway 74, east of Edgehill Way and north of Pitahaya Street. The following Assessor’s Parcels Numbers (APN) are included: 640 - 230-002 through 640-230-027 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project is a request to designate the existing Sandpiper Circle 4 Condominiums as a local historic district, within the Sandpiper Condominiums development. The Cultural Resources Preservation Committee will make a recommendation to the Palm Desert City Council. PUBLIC HEARING: NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Cultural Resources Preservation Committee of the City of Palm Desert, California, will hold a Public Hearing at its meeting on February 26, 2025. The Cultural Resources Preservation Committee meeting begins at 9:00 a.m. in the Administrative Conference Room at 73510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California. Pursuant to Assembly Bill 2449, this meeting may be conducted as a hybrid meeting allowing public access via teleconference or in person. Options for remote participation will be listed on the Posted Agenda for the meeting at https://www.palmdesert.gov/departments/city-manager-s- office/city-clerk/committee-calendar. PUBLIC REVIEW: The plans and related documents are available for public review Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. by contacting the project planner, Carlos Flores. Please submit written comments to the Planning division. If any group challenges the action in court, issues raised may be limited to only those issues raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence at or prior to the Cultural Resources Preservation Committee hearing. All comments and any questions should be directed to: Carlos Flores, Principal Planner City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 (760) 776-6478 cflores@palmdesert.gov PUBLISH: THE DESERT SUN RICHARD D. CANNONE, AICP, SECRETARY FEBRUARY 14, 2025 CULTURAL RESOURCES PRESERVATION COMMITTEE 55 56 Cultural Resource Preservation Committee Year 2024 2024 2024 2024 2024 2024 2024 2024 2024 2024 Month Oct Sep Aug Jul Jun May Apr Mar Feb Jan Day 23 25 28 24 26 22 24 27 28 24 Clark, Paul P E P - P - - P - A 1 1 Graybill, Don P A P - P - - P - P 1 0 Housken, Kim P P E - P - - P - P 0 1 McCune, Rochelle P P P - P - - P - P 0 0 Mortensen, Thomas A P P - P - - P - P 1 0 Toltzmann, David P P P - P - - P - P 0 0 Vassalli, Linda A P P - P - - P - E 1 1 Palm Desert Municipal Code 2.34.010 Monthly: Three unexcused absences from regular meeting in any twelve-month period shall constitute an automatic resignation of members holding office on boards that meet bimonthly. Please contact the Recording Secretary to discuss any attendance concerns. Total Absences Unexcused Excused 57