HomeMy WebLinkAboutCVAG Active Transportation Plan (2016)Prepared by:
Michael Baker International
9755 Clairemont Mesa Blvd., San Diego, CA 92124
858.614.5000 ▪ www.mbakerintl.com
AT
P
ACTIVE
TRANSPORTATION
PLAN
This page intentionally left blank
This page intentionally left blank
Page i
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION
Process ............................................................................... 1-2
Public Outreach .................................................................... 1-2
Meetings with Local Jurisdictions ......................................... 1-2
Plan Organization ............................................................... 1-2
CHAPTER 2. PLANNING CONTEXT
Introduction ....................................................................... 2-1
CV Link Conceptual Master Plan .......................................... 2-2
Neighborhood Electric Vehicle (NEV) Plan ............................ 2-3
Whitewater River, Coachella Canal, and Dillon Road ............ 2-4
Riverside County Trails Plan for the Coachella Valley ........... 2-4
City of Indio 2009 Trails Feasibility Study ............................. 2-4
Complete Streets Act of 2008 .............................................. 2-4
Assembly Bill 32 – The Global Warming Solutions Act .......... 2-4
Senate Bill 375 .................................................................... 2-4
Senate Bill 99 ...................................................................... 2-5
CHAPTER 3. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
Introduction ....................................................................... 3-1
Goal 1: Bicycle Transportation ............................................. 3-1
Page ii
Goal 1 Objectives: ................................................................. 3-2
Objective A ___________________________________ 3-2
Objective B ___________________________________ 3-2
Objective C ___________________________________ 3-3
Objective D ___________________________________ 3-3
Objective E ___________________________________ 3-4
Objective F____________________________________ 3-4
Objective G ___________________________________ 3-4
Goal 2: The Pedestrian Realm .............................................. 3-5
Goal 2 Objectives: ................................................................. 3-5
Objective A ___________________________________ 3-5
Objective B ___________________________________ 3-5
Objective C ___________________________________ 3-5
Objective D ___________________________________ 3-6
CHAPTER 4. LOCAL BICYCLE PLANS
Introduction ....................................................................... 4-1
Bicycle Commuting ............................................................. 4-3
Consistency with Other Transportation, Air Quality, Energy
Plans .................................................................................. 4-3
Local and Regional Bikeway and Transportation Plans......... 4-3
Regional Air Quality and Energy Plan Consistency ............... 4-4
Whitewater River Bike Path .................................................. 4-4
Coachella Valley Link (CV Link) Conceptual Master Plan ...... 4-4
Neighborhood Electric Vehicle (NEV) Plan ............................ 4-4
Bicycle Crash Analysis ......................................................... 4-4
Definitions .......................................................................... 4-6
Bike Paths – Class I Bikeways ................................................ 4-6
Bike Lanes – Class II Bikeways ............................................... 4-6
Bike Routes – Class III Bikeways ............................................ 4-7
Colored Bike Lanes................................................................ 4-7
Buffered Bike Lanes .............................................................. 4-7
Protected Bike Lanes ............................................................ 4-8
Greenback Sharrows ............................................................. 4-8
Paved Multipurpose Paths .................................................... 4-9
Sidewalk Paths ...................................................................... 4-9
NEV Paths ............................................................................. 4-9
NEV Lanes ............................................................................. 4-9
Golf Cart Paths ...................................................................... 4-9
Golf Cart/Bike Paths ........................................................... 4-10
Golf Cart/Bike Routes ......................................................... 4-10
City of Blythe Bicycle Plan ................................................. 4-11
Land Use ............................................................................. 4-11
Bikeways ............................................................................. 4-14
Bicycle Parking .................................................................... 4-18
Links to Other Transportation Modes ................................ 4-18
Bicycle Amenities ................................................................ 4-18
Bicycle Safety Education and Police Enforcement ............. 4-18
Wayfinding Signage ............................................................ 4-18
Past Expenditures for Bicycle Facilities ............................... 4-18
Maintenance Policies .......................................................... 4-18
Other Related Policies ........................................................ 4-18
Coordination with Neighboring Jurisdictions ..................... 4-18
Future Financial Needs ....................................................... 4-18
Grant Reporting Policies ..................................................... 4-18
City of Cathedral City Bicycle Plan ...................................... 4-19
Land Use ............................................................................. 4-19
Bikeways ............................................................................. 4-22
Bicycle Parking .................................................................... 4-27
Links to Other Transportation Modes ................................ 4-27
Page iii
Bicycle Amenities ................................................................ 4-27
Bicycle Safety Education and Police Enforcement .............. 4-27
Wayfinding Signage ............................................................. 4-28
Past Funding for Bicycle Facilities ....................................... 4-28
Maintenance Policies .......................................................... 4-28
Other Related Policies ......................................................... 4-28
Coordination with Neighboring Jurisdictions ...................... 4-28
Future Financial Needs ....................................................... 4-29
Grant Reporting Policies ..................................................... 4-29
City of Coachella Bicycle Plan ............................................ 4-31
Land Use .............................................................................. 4-31
Bikeways ............................................................................. 4-34
Bicycle Parking .................................................................... 4-39
Links to Other Transportation Modes ................................. 4-39
Bicycle Amenities ................................................................ 4-39
Bicycle Safety Education and Police Enforcement .............. 4-39
Wayfinding Signage ............................................................. 4-40
Past Funding for Bicycle Facilities ....................................... 4-40
Maintenance Policies .......................................................... 4-40
Other Related Policies ......................................................... 4-40
Coordination with Neighboring Jurisdictions ...................... 4-40
Future Financial Needs ....................................................... 4-40
Grant Reporting Policies ..................................................... 4-40
City of Desert Hot Springs Bicycle Plan ............................... 4-41
Land Use .............................................................................. 4-41
Bikeways ............................................................................. 4-44
Bicycle Parking .................................................................... 4-49
Links to Other Transportation Modes ................................. 4-49
Bicycle Amenities ................................................................ 4-49
Bicycle Safety Education and Police Enforcement .............. 4-49
Wayfinding Signage ............................................................ 4-50
Past Expenditures for Bicycle Facilities ............................... 4-50
Maintenance Policies .......................................................... 4-51
Other Related Policies ........................................................ 4-51
Coordination with Neighboring Jurisdictions ..................... 4-51
Future Financial Needs ....................................................... 4-51
Grant Reporting Policies ..................................................... 4-51
City of Indian Wells Bicycle Plan ........................................ 4-53
Land Use ............................................................................. 4-53
Bikeways ............................................................................. 4-56
Bicycle Parking .................................................................... 4-60
Links to Other Transportation Modes ................................ 4-60
Bicycle Amenities ................................................................ 4-60
Bicycle Safety Education and Police Enforcement ............. 4-60
Wayfinding Signage ............................................................ 4-60
Past Funding for Bicycle Facilities ....................................... 4-60
Coordination with Neighboring Jurisdictions ..................... 4-60
Maintenance Policies .......................................................... 4-60
Other Related Policies ........................................................ 4-61
Future Financial Needs ....................................................... 4-61
Grant Reporting Policies ..................................................... 4-61
City of Indio Bicycle Plan ................................................... 4-63
Land Use ............................................................................. 4-63
Bikeways ............................................................................. 4-66
Bicycle Parking .................................................................... 4-71
Links to Other Transportation Modes ................................ 4-71
Bicycle Amenities ................................................................ 4-71
Bicycle Safety Education and Police Enforcement ............. 4-72
Wayfinding Signage ............................................................ 4-72
Past Funding for Bicycle Facilities ....................................... 4-72
Page iv
Maintenance Policies .......................................................... 4-72
Other Related Policies ......................................................... 4-72
Coordination with Neighboring Jurisdictions ...................... 4-72
Future Financial Needs........................................................ 4-73
Grant Reporting Policies ..................................................... 4-73
City of La Quinta Bicycle Plan ............................................ 4-75
Land Use .............................................................................. 4-75
Bikeways.............................................................................. 4-78
Bicycle Parking .................................................................... 4-83
Links to Other Transportation Modes ................................. 4-83
Bicycle Amenities ................................................................ 4-84
Bicycle Safety Education and Police Enforcement .............. 4-84
Wayfinding Signage ............................................................. 4-84
Past Expenditures for Bicycle Facilities ............................... 4-84
Maintenance Policies .......................................................... 4-84
Other Related Policies ......................................................... 4-84
Coordination with Neighboring Jurisdictions ...................... 4-84
Future Financial Needs........................................................ 4-85
Grant Reporting Policies ..................................................... 4-85
City of Palm Desert Bicycle Plan ......................................... 4-87
Land Use .............................................................................. 4-87
Bikeways.............................................................................. 4-90
Bicycle Parking .................................................................... 4-96
Links to Other Transportation Modes ................................. 4-96
Bicycle Amenities ................................................................ 4-97
Bicycle Safety Education and Police Enforcement .............. 4-97
Wayfinding Signage ............................................................. 4-97
Past Expenditures for Bicycle Facilities ............................... 4-97
Maintenance Policies .......................................................... 4-97
Other Related Policies ......................................................... 4-98
Coordination with Neighboring Jurisdictions ..................... 4-98
Future Financial Needs ....................................................... 4-98
Grant Reporting Policies ..................................................... 4-98
City of Palm Springs Bicycle Plan........................................ 4-99
Land Use ............................................................................. 4-99
Bikeways ........................................................................... 4-104
Bicycle Parking .................................................................. 4-119
Links to Other Transportation Modes .............................. 4-120
Bicycle Amenities .............................................................. 4-120
Bicycle Safety Education and Police Enforcement ........... 4-120
Wayfinding Signage .......................................................... 4-121
Past Expenditures for Bicycle Facilities ............................. 4-121
Maintenance Policies ........................................................ 4-121
Other Related Policies ...................................................... 4-121
Coordination with Neighboring Jurisdictions ................... 4-121
Future Financial Needs ..................................................... 4-121
Grant Reporting Policies ................................................... 4-121
City of Rancho Mirage Bicycle Plan .................................. 4-123
Land Use ........................................................................... 4-123
Bikeways ........................................................................... 4-126
Bicycle Parking .................................................................. 4-131
Links to Other Transportation Modes .............................. 4-131
Bicycle Amenities .............................................................. 4-131
Bicycle Safety Education and Police Enforcement ........... 4-131
Wayfinding Signage .......................................................... 4-131
Past Expenditures for Bicycle Facilities ............................. 4-132
Maintenance Policies ........................................................ 4-132
Other Related Policies ...................................................... 4-132
Coordination with Neighboring Jurisdictions ................... 4-132
Future Financial Needs ..................................................... 4-132
Page v
Grant Reporting Policies ................................................... 4-132
Unincorporated Riverside County Bicycle Plan ................. 4-133
Land Use ............................................................................ 4-133
Bikeways ........................................................................... 4-144
Bicycle Parking .................................................................. 4-164
Links to Other Transportation Modes ............................... 4-165
Bicycle Amenities .............................................................. 4-165
Bicycle Safety Education and Police Enforcement ............ 4-165
Wayfinding Signage ........................................................... 4-166
Past Expenditures for Bicycle Facilities ............................. 4-166
Maintenance Policies ........................................................ 4-166
Other Related Policies ....................................................... 4-166
Coordination with Neighboring Jurisdictions .................... 4-166
Future Financial Needs ..................................................... 4-166
Grant Reporting Policies ................................................. 4-1661
CHAPTER 5. REGIONAL BIKEWAY PLAN
Introduction ....................................................................... 5-1
Bikeway Plan ...................................................................... 5-1
ATP Corridors ........................................................................ 5-2
Regional Significance ............................................................ 5-2
ATP Regional Network .......................................................... 5-2
CHAPTER 6. PEDESTRIAN
IMPROVEMENTS TO MAJOR TRANSIT HUBS
Introduction ....................................................................... 6-1
A. Palm Canyon Drive at Baristo Road, Palm Springs ............ 6-2
A1. Palm Canyon Drive and Tahquitz Canyon Way ............... 6-4
A2. Palm Canyon Drive and Arenas Road ............................. 6-5
A3. Palm Canyon Drive and Baristo Road ............................. 6-6
A4. Baristo Road and Belardo Road ...................................... 6-7
A5. Palm Canyon Drive and Ramon Road ............................. 6-8
A6. Palm Canyon Drive and Camino Parocela and Indian
Canyon Drive ................................................................... 6-9
A7. Indian Canyon Drive and Ramon Road ......................... 6-10
A8. Indian Canyon Drive and Baristo Road ......................... 6-11
A9. Indian Canyon Drive and Arenas Road ......................... 6-12
A10. Indian Canyon Drive and Tahquitz Canyon Way ........ 6-13
B. Baristo Road at Farrell Drive, Palm Springs .................... 6-14
B1. Baristo Road and Farrell Drive ...................................... 6-16
B2. Farrell Drive and Tahquitz Canyon Way ....................... 6-17
B3. Baristo Road and El Cielo Road ..................................... 6-17
B4. Baristo Road and Civic Drive ......................................... 6-18
B5. Baristo Road and Compadre Road ............................... 6-19
B6. Baristo Road and the Palm Springs High School
Entrance ........................................................................ 6-20
B7. Baristo Road and Cerritos Drive/Pavilion Way ............. 6-20
B8. Farrell Drive and Ramon Road ...................................... 6-21
C. B Street at Buddy Rogers Avenue, Cathedral City ........... 6-22
C1. B Street and Buddy Rogers Avenue .............................. 6-24
C2. Van Fleet Street/Monty Hall Drive and Palm Canyon
Drive .............................................................................. 6-25
C3. Palm Canyon Drive and Buddy Rogers Avenue ............ 6-26
C4. Palm Canyon Drive and Cathedral Canyon Drive ......... 6-27
D. Town Center Way at Hahn Road, Palm Desert ............... 6-28
D1. Highway 111 and Monterey Avenue ............................ 6-30
D2. Monterey Avenue and Hahn Road ............................... 6-31
D3. Town Center Way and Hahn Road ............................... 6-32
D4. Monterey Avenue and Fred Waring Drive ................... 6-33
Page vi
D5. Fred Waring Drive and Town Center Way .................... 6-34
D6. Highway 111 and Town Center Way ............................ 6-35
Summary .......................................................................... 6-36
CHAPTER 7. FUNDING SOURCES
Introduction ....................................................................... 7-1
Federal Funding Programs ................................................... 7-1
MAP-21 ................................................................................. 7-1
Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) ..................... 7-2
Transportation, Community, And System Preservation
Program (TCSP) ............................................................... 7-3
Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF) ......................... 7-3
Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) ................... 7-3
Rivers, Trails, And Conservation Assistance
Program (RTCA) ............................................................... 7-3
State Funding Programs ...................................................... 7-4
Active Transportation Program ............................................. 7-4
Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) ................................................. 7-4
Assembly Bill (AB) 2766 Subvention Program ...................... 7-5
Transportation Planning Grant Program ............................... 7-5
Local Funding ...................................................................... 7-6
Measure A ............................................................................. 7-6
Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) ................... 7-6
CHAPTER 8. DESIGN GUIDANCE
Introduction ....................................................................... 8-1
Bicycle Design Guidelines .................................................... 8-1
Class I Bike Path Facilities Design Recommendations ........... 8-2
Class II Bike Lane Facilities Design Recommendations ......... 8-3
Colored Bike Lanes ................................................................ 8-5
Buffered Bike Lanes .............................................................. 8-5
Class III Bike Routes .............................................................. 8-6
Sharrows ............................................................................... 8-6
Greenback Sharrows ............................................................. 8-8
Colored Pavement Treatments ............................................. 8-8
Wayfinding ............................................................................ 8-9
Legal Status ........................................................................... 8-9
Bikeway Intersections ....................................................... 8-10
Bikeway Markings at Intersections ..................................... 8-11
Bike Signal Heads ................................................................ 8-11
Bicycle Signal Detection ...................................................... 8-11
Bike Boxes ........................................................................... 8-12
Bicycle Countdowns ............................................................ 8-12
Leading Bicycle Intervals ..................................................... 8-12
Two-Stage Turn Queue Boxes............................................. 8-13
Protected Intersections ...................................................... 8-13
Bicycle Parking .................................................................... 8-14
Pedestrian Design Guidelines ............................................ 8-16
Intersection Type Guidance ................................................ 8-17
Audio Pedestrian Signal ...................................................... 8-18
Advance Stop Bar ................................................................ 8-19
Advance Yield Line .............................................................. 8-20
Countdown Signal ............................................................... 8-21
Crosswalk Markings ............................................................ 8-22
Curb Extension .................................................................... 8-23
Curb Ramp .......................................................................... 8-24
Intersection Geometry Modification .................................. 8-25
Lighting ............................................................................... 8-26
Median ................................................................................ 8-27
Midblock Crossing ............................................................... 8-28
Page vii
Neighborhood Traffic Circle ................................................ 8-29
Pedestrian Crossing Island .................................................. 8-30
Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon ................................................... 8-31
Raised Crosswalk ................................................................. 8-32
Rectangular Rapid-Flash Beacon ......................................... 8-33
Reduced Curb Radius .......................................................... 8-34
Right-Turn Channelization Island ........................................ 8-35
Roundabout ........................................................................ 8-36
Scramble Phase ................................................................... 8-38
Signs .................................................................................... 8-39
Speed Feedback Sign ........................................................... 8-40
Access Management ........................................................... 8-41
Streetscape Feature ............................................................ 8-42
Sidewalk Design ................................................................ 8-43
Frontage Zone ..................................................................... 8-43
Pedestrian Zone .................................................................. 8-43
Furniture Zone .................................................................... 8-44
Curb Zone ............................................................................ 8-44
Other Sidewalk Guidelines .................................................. 8-44
Land Use ........................................................................... 8-45
Residential Neighborhoods ................................................. 8-45
Activity Centers ................................................................... 8-46
Transit Oriented Districts .................................................... 8-47
Neighborhood Edges ........................................................... 8-47
Urban Neighborhoods ......................................................... 8-47
Workplace Districts ............................................................. 8-47
Special Campuses ................................................................ 8-47
General Guidelines .............................................................. 8-51
LIST OF TABLES
4-1. Per Mile Costs
4-2. Bicycle Crash Analysis
4-3. City of Blythe Proposed Bikeway Projects
4-4. City of Cathedral City Existing Bikeways
4-5. City of Cathedral City Proposed Bikeway Projects
4-6. Proposed Bus Stop Locations for Bike Racks and/or Bike
Lockers in Cathedral City
4.7. City of Coachella Existing Bikeways
4-8. City of Coachella Proposed Bikeway Projects
4-9. Proposed Bus Stop Locations for Bike Racks and/or Bike
Lockers in Coachella
4-10. City of Desert Hot Springs Existing Bikeways
4-11. City of Desert Hot Springs Proposed Bikeway Projects
4.12 Proposed Bus Stop Locations for Bike Racks and/or Bike
Lockers in Desert Hot Springs
4.13 Past Expenditures for Bicycle Projects in Desert Hot
Springs
4-14. City of Indian Wells Existing Bikeways
4-15. City of Indian Wells Proposed Bikeway Projects
4.16 Proposed Bus Stop Locations for Bike Racks and/or Bike
Lockers in Indian Wells
4-17. City of Indio Existing Bikeways
4-18. City of Indio Proposed Bikeway Projects
4.19 Proposed Bus Stop Locations for Bike Racks and/or Bike
Lockers in Indio
4-20. City of La Quinta Existing Bikeways
4-21. City of La Quinta Proposed Bikeway Projects
Page viii
4.22 Proposed Bus Stop Locations for Bike Racks and/or Bike
Lockers in La Quinta
4-23. City of Palm Desert Existing Bikeways
4-24. City of Palm Desert Proposed Bikeway Projects
4-25. Proposed Bus Stop Locations for Bike Racks and/or Bike
Lockers in Palm Desert
4-26. City of Palm Springs Existing Bikeways
4-27. City of Palm Springs Proposed Bikeway Projects
4-28. Bicycle Parking Facility Locations in Palm Springs
4-29. Proposed Locations for New Bicycle Parking in Palm
Springs
4-30. Proposed Bus Stop Locations for Bike Racks and/or Bike
Lockers in Palm Springs
4-31. City of Rancho Mirage Existing Bikeways
4-32. City of Rancho Mirage Proposed Bikeway Projects
4-33. Proposed Bus Stop Locations for Bike Racks and/or Bike
Lockers in Rancho Mirage
4-34. County of Riverside Existing Bikeways
4-35. County of Riverside Proposed Bikeway Projects
4-36. Proposed Bus Stop Locations for Bike Racks and/or Bike
Lockers in Unincorporated Riverside County
5-1. Regional Bikeway/NEV
5-2. Regional Bikeway/NEV Costs
6-1. Four Major Transit Transfer Points
6-2. Proposed Pedestrian Improvements by City
6-3. Proposed Transit Stop Bike Amenities by City
8-1. Minimum Widths
LIST OF FIGURES
2-1. CV Link Conceptual Master Plan
2-2. CVAG NEV Network Concept
4-1. City of Blythe Land Use
4-2. City of Blythe Crash Map
4-3. City of Blythe Local Network
4-3a. City of Blythe Local Network with ATP IDs
4-4. City of Cathedral City Land Use
4-5. City of Cathedral City Crash Map
4-6. City of Cathedral City Local Network
4-6a. City of Cathedral City Local Network with ATP IDs
4-7. City of Coachella Land Use
4-8. City of Coachella Crash Map
4-9. City of Coachella Local Network
4-9a. City of Coachella Local Network with ATP IDs
4-10. City of Desert Hot Springs Land Use
4-11. City of Desert Hot Springs Crash Map
4-12. City of Desert Hot Springs Local Network
4-12a. City of Desert Hot Springs Local Network with ATP IDs
4-13. City of Indian Wells Land Use
4-14. City of Indian Wells Crash Map
4-15. City of Indian Wells Local Network
4-15a. City of Indian Wells Local Network with ATP IDs
4-16. City of Indio Land Use
4-17. City of Indio Crash Map
4-18. City of Indio Local Network
4-18a. City of Indio Local Network with ATP IDs
4-19. City of La Quinta Land Use
4-20. City of La Quinta Crash Map
Page ix
4-21. City of La Quinta Local Network
4-21a. City of La Quinta Local Network with ATP IDs
4-22. City of Palm Desert Land Use
4-23. City of Palm Desert Crash Map
4-24. City of Palm Desert Local Network
4-24a. City of Palm Desert Local Network with ATP IDs
4-25. City of Palm Springs Land Use
4-26a-c. City of Palm Springs Crash Map
4-27a-c. City of Palm Springs Local Network
4-27d-f. City of Palm Springs Local Network with ATP IDs
4-28. City of Rancho Mirage Land Use
4-29. City of Rancho Mirage Crash Map
4-30. City of Rancho Mirage Local Network
4-30a. City of Rancho Mirage Local Network with ATP IDs
4-31a-d. Unincorporated Riverside County Land Use
4-32. County of Riverside – East Land Use
4-33a-d. Unincorporated Riverside County Crash Map
4-34. County of Riverside – East Crash Map
4-35a-e. Unincorporated Riverside County Local Network
4-35f-i. Unincorporated Riverside County Local Network with
ATP IDs
4-36a. County of Riverside – East Local Network with ATP IDs
5-1. City of Blythe – Regionally Significant ATP Facilities
5-1a. City of Blythe –
Regionally Significant ATP with Facility ID
5-2. City of Cathedral City - Regionally Significant ATP
Facilities
5-2a. City of Cathedral City –
Regionally Significant ATP with Facility ID
5-3. City of Coachella - Regionally Significant ATP Facilities
5-3a. City of Coachella –
Regionally Significant ATP with Facility ID
5-4. City of Desert Hot Springs - Regionally Significant ATP
Facilities
5-4a. City of Desert Hot Springs –
Regionally Significant ATP with Facility ID
5-5. City of Indian Wells - Regionally Significant ATP Facilities
5-5a. City of Indian Wells –
Regionally Significant ATP with Facility ID
5-6. City of Indio - Regionally Significant ATP Facilities
5-6a. City of Indio –
Regionally Significant ATP with Facility ID
5-7. City of La Quinta - Regionally Significant ATP Facilities
5-7a. City of La Quinta –
Regionally Significant ATP with Facility ID
5-8. City of Palm Desert - Regionally Significant ATP Facilities
5-8a. City of Palm Desert –
Regionally Significant ATP with Facility ID
5-9a-c. City of Palm Springs - Regionally Significant ATP Facilities
5-9d-f. City of Palm Springs –
Regionally Significant ATP with Facility ID
Page x
5-10. City of Rancho Mirage - Regionally Significant ATP
Facilities
5-10a. City of Rancho Mirage –
Regionally Significant ATP with Facility ID
5-11a-e. Unincorporated Riverside County- Regionally
Significant ATP Facilities
5-11f-j. Unincorporated Riverside County –
Regionally Significant ATP with Facility ID
6-A. Pedestrian Improvements to Major Transit Hubs: Palm
Springs
6-B. Pedestrian Improvements to Major Transit Hubs: Palm
Springs
6-C. Pedestrian Improvements to Major Transit Hubs:
Cathedral City
6-D. Pedestrian Improvements to Major Transit Hubs: Palm
Desert
Page 1-1
The Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG)
recognizes the value of providing opportunities for local residents
and visitors to bicycle for transportation and recreation and to have
attractive opportunities to walk to transit stops, as well as to
encourage people to use neighborhood electric vehicles (NEVs).
Such opportunities help reduce auto trips, improve the
environment, promote healthy lifestyles, and create livable
communities. As this Active Transportation Plan (Plan or ATP) is
implemented, it will transform the Coachella and Palo Verde
Valleys into places where more people use a bicycle to get to work,
to school, or to the store. The ATP will bring more recreational
opportunities to valley residents. In the long run, Plan
implementation will create a full network of bikeways serving
nearly every neighborhood. It will improve pedestrian access to the
five major transit hubs in the Coachella Valley. It will expand
opportunities to use NEVs around town and along the Whitewater
River. The Plan will enhance the reputation of the Coachella and
Palo Verde Valleys as tourist meccas. Future tourists may be able to
pick up a bicycle at their hotel and ride for fun, to restaurants, and
even to the area’s spectacular canyons. More children will be able
to ride a bicycle safely to school. Many retirees will experience
enhanced lifestyles as their bicycling options expand.
Page 1-2
This Active Transportation Plan updates the Non-Motorized
Transportation Plan for bikeways that was first completed in 2001,
then updated in 2010. It revises the regional bikeway plan as well as
bicycle plans for each jurisdiction. The bicycle plans will keep each
city and the County of Riverside eligible for various bikeway funds.
Palm Springs, Cathedral City, and Palm Desert will also improve
their chances of receiving funds for the pedestrian improvements
around the five major SunLine Transit transfer points in this Plan.
Those points are:
South Palm Canyon Drive at Baristo Road in Palm Springs
Baristo Road at Farrell Drive in Palm Springs
B Street at Buddy Rogers Avenue in Cathedral City
Town Center Way at Hahn Road in Palm Desert
Plans for all of the facilities contained herein provide opportunities
to include them along with future development.
PROCESS
As an update of the 2001 and 2010 plans, this Plan relied primarily
on information from the local jurisdictions and the general public.
The primary fieldwork that was conducted related to the pedestrian
improvements at the transit hubs.
Public Outreach
A series of workshops was conducted to solicit input from the
general public.
The workshops introduced the planning process for the entire
Coachella and Palo Verde Valleys and gathered both general and
location-specific comments with marked-up maps. Identical
workshops were presented to participants in the western, central,
and eastern Coachella Valley. An additional workshop was held in
the Palo Verde Valley.
Results from the workshops are displayed in Appendix A.
Meetings with Local Jurisdictions
The planning consultant met with each of the cities in the
Coachella Valley, the City of Blythe, and the County of Riverside to
determine what has been constructed since the 2010 plan and to
determine what they would like added in this ATP. The consultant
also met with the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians and the
Torres Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians. The consultant included
the projects suggested by the public for consideration.
The results of the meetings with local jurisdictions determined the
projects that are included in this Plan. Drafts of each local
alternative transportation plan were shared with local jurisdictions,
with feedback incorporated into the final document.
PLAN ORGANIZATION
Chapter 2 describes the planning context with other
related plans that are either completed or in process.
Chapter 3 reiterates and modifies the goals and objectives
from the 2010 Non-Motorized Transportation Plan.
Chapter 4 discusses the individual bicycle plans for each
jurisdiction.
Chapter 5 presents the entire bikeway plan in both the
Coachella and Palo Verde Valleys. It also identifies
coordination between this Plan and the Neighborhood
Electric Vehicle Plan.
Chapter 6 presents the plans for pedestrian improvements
near the major transit hubs.
Page 1-3
Chapter 7 describes eligible funding sources.
Chapter 8 provides design guidance.
The Appendix displays results of the public outreach effort
and of meetings with local jurisdictions.
Page 1-4
This page intentionally left blank
Page 2-1
INTRODUCTION
This Active Transportation Plan (Plan or ATP) takes place within
an active planning environment in the Coachella and Palo Verde
Valleys. It is being produced in conjunction with an update of the
Transportation Project Prioritization Study, the Regional Arterial
Cost Estimate, and the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee
Nexus Study. These efforts will determine future needs for
Coachella Valley and Palo Verde Valley streets, their costs, and the
means of funding them. Since the ATP is produced as part of a
larger effort, the appropriate projects identified in the Plan will be
included as part of the other plans. As a result, appropriate
regionally significant projects will be potentially eligible for the
same funding sources.
The following briefly describe other recent plans that relate to this
Plan. This Active Transportation Plan is produced in such a way as
to ensure consistency among plans.
Page 2-2
CV LINK CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLAN
The Coachella Valley Link (CV Link) Conceptual Master Plan
proposes improvements along the Whitewater River and
connecting alignments that will include a paved path for bicycles,
pedestrians, and low-speed electric vehicles (LSEVs). LSEVs
include electric golf carts and neighborhood electric vehicles
(NEVs) that travel up to 25 miles per hour (mph). The CV Link
project will connect with eight of nine Coachella Valley cities and
three Indian reservations.
The Active Transportation Plan will propose bikeways and NEV
routes that will serve as connectors to the CV Link Conceptual
Master Plan project. The CV Link Conceptual Plan is shown in
Figure 2-1.
Figure 2‐1. CV Link Conceptual Master Plan
Page 2-3
NEIGHBORHOOD ELECTRIC VEHICLE
(NEV) PLAN
CVAG has completed a Neighborhood Electric Vehicle (NEV)
Plan for the Coachella Valley that proposes a network of NEV
routes along surface streets and along rights-of-way that can be
used for paths. Per California Streets and Highways Code Chapter
6, cities in Riverside County may create an NEV plan that identifies
NEV/bicycle routes.
NEVs are permitted to run on streets with speed limits of less than
35 mph. This constraint limits travel within the Coachella Valley, as
a large number of the arterial streets traversing the valley have
speed limits of up to 45 to 55 mph. NEVs are also permitted to
operate on streets that have dedicated lanes with widths of 7 feet or
greater. These lanes can be shared with bicycles. Dedicated off-
road paths along waterways or other continuous rights-of-way may
also be shared with NEVs, if so designated. Generally, off-road
paths are restricted to non-motorized devices but they can be
designated to permit operation of NEVs as well. NEVs may also
share roadways with motor vehicles and bicycles on streets with
speed limits of 35 mph or less as described above. Per another
section of California Streets and Highways Code Chapter 6, the
City of Palm Desert has a golf cart plan that allows the City to
permit golf carts with a special city license on any designated golf
cart/bicycle route or golf cart/bicycle lane. Every on-street
bikeway in Palm Desert also permits golf carts.
This ATP will integrate the NEV Plan along with bikeway
planning. The following map, Figure 2-2, shows the NEV Plan
routes.
Figure 2‐2. CVAG NEV Network Concept
Page 2-4
WHITEWATER RIVER, COACHELLA
CANAL, AND DILLON ROAD
The Coachella Valley Recreation and Parks District and the
Riverside County Regional Park and Open-Space District
contracted with a consultant to develop a more detailed plan for
the following three alignments in Coachella Valley:
Whitewater River
Coachella Canal
Dillon Road
The plan detailed the alignments, bikeway, trail types, and access
points for these three corridors. The bikeway alignments are
included in this Plan. The CV Link Conceptual Master Plan
updates and adds much more detail to the Whitewater River plan.
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRAILS PLAN
FOR THE COACHELLA VALLEY
The Riverside County Regional Park and Open-Space District
incorporated an updated Trails Plan into the County’s 2009
General Plan update. This ATP includes the bikeway alignments
from that plan.
CITY OF INDIO 2009 TRAILS
FEASIBILITY STUDY
In 2009, the City of Indio conducted a Trails Feasibility Study that
planned new bikeways and trails. This ATP includes the bikeways
from that plan.
COMPLETE STREETS ACT OF 2008
In 2008, the State of California adopted the Complete Streets Act
of 2008. The law requires local governments to consider all users in
planning for all streets. Governments must plan for bicyclists,
pedestrians, and transit users as well as for motorists. They also are
required to plan for all ages and physical abilities. Such
accommodations may include sidewalks, bike lanes, crosswalks,
pedestrian crossing improvements, wide shoulders, medians, bus
bulbs, and audible pedestrian signals, among others. As of 2011,
whenever local governments revise their general plan circulation
elements, the provisions of this law take effect. By adopting the
bicycle plans contained in this Plan into their circulation elements,
cities and the County would comply with that part of the law.
ASSEMBLY BILL 32 – THE GLOBAL
WARMING SOLUTIONS ACT
In 2008, the State of California adopted Assembly Bill (AB) 32,
which requires the California Air Resources Board (CARB) to
develop regulations and market mechanisms to reduce California's
greenhouse gas emissions by 25 percent by 2020 and by 80 percent
by 2050 below 1990 levels. By adopting and implementing the
bicycle plans contained in this Plan into their circulation elements,
cities and the County would progress toward these objectives.
SENATE BILL 375
In 2008, the State of California adopted Senate Bill (SB) 375 aimed
at reducing greenhouse gases caused by motor vehicles. The bill
calls on regional governments to develop plans to reduce sprawl
and develop bicycle, pedestrian, and transit transportation modes.
SB 375 offers cities and developers incentives to develop in a more
compact form. By adopting and implementing the bicycle plans
Page 2-5
contained in this ATP into their circulation elements, cities and the
County would progress toward the intent of this law. Cities and the
County can also make progress toward the law’s intent by adopting
“smart growth” strategies in their land use planning to mold new
development into a form that makes new neighborhoods walkable
and bicycle friendly.
SENATE BILL 99
In 2013, the State of California adopted SB 99, updating Chapter 8
of Division 3 of California’s Streets and Highways Code: Active
Transportation Program, which includes:
Section 2380. There is hereby established the Active
Transportation Program in the department for the purpose
of encouraging increased use of active modes of
transportation, such as biking and walking. It is the intent
of the Legislature that the program achieve all of the
following goals:
1. Increase the proportion of trips accomplished by
biking and walking.
2. Increase safety and mobility for non-motorized users.
3. Advance the active transportation efforts of regional
agencies to achieve greenhouse gas reduction goals.
4. Enhance public health, including reduction of
childhood obesity through the use of programs
including, but not limited to, projects eligible for Safe
Routes to School Program funding.
5. Ensure that disadvantaged communities fully share in
the benefits of the program.
6. Provide a broad spectrum of projects to benefit many
types of active transportation users.
Page 2-6
This page intentionally left blank
Page 3-1
INTRODUCTION
These goals and objectives update those from the 2010 Non-
Motorized Transportation Plan. They include the bicycle and
pedestrian elements.
Goals provide the context for the specific objectives and policy
guidelines discussed in the Active Transportation Plan (Plan or
ATP). The goals provide the long-term vision and serve as the
foundation of the Plan. Goals are broad statements of purpose that
do not provide specific action statements, while policy guidelines
provide a bridge between general policies and actual
implementation guidelines, which are provided in the following
sections. As with Plan recommendations, none of the goals or
objectives is funded at this time. This ATP and the goals,
objectives, and policy guidelines herein do not mandate any specific
action by the Coachella Valley Association of Governments or
local jurisdictions. The goals and objectives are meant as guidelines
and are not required actions by the jurisdictions.
GOAL 1: BICYCLE TRANSPORTATION
Provide a friendly environment for bicycling in the Coachella and
Palo Verde Valleys and make bicycling an integral part of the
transportation network by implementing and maintaining a
Page 3-2
connected bikeway network, providing for ancillary facilities, and
encouraging bicycling as a convenient and safe mode of
transportation for all residents and visitors and for those of all skill
levels.
The following objectives address this goal in detail. More detailed
plans for implementation of this goal are contained in the following
sections.
Goal 1 Objectives
Objective A
Implement the Bicycle Transportation Plan, which identifies
existing and future needs and provides specific recommendations
for facilities and programs over the next 20 years.
Objective A Policy Guidelines
1. Encourage local agencies to assign a full- or part-time bicycle
coordinator who could help implement their plans, act as a
liaison to the public, and pursue funding for bicycle facilities
projects.
2. Ensure the compatibility of bicycle planning efforts among
local agencies.
3. Encourage local agencies to update their plans periodically to
reflect new policies and/or requirements for non-motorized
transportation funding.
4. Encourage local agencies to coordinate among all
municipalities, schools, and community organizations to
review and comment on bicycle issues.
5. Encourage local agencies to regularly monitor bicycle-related
crash levels, and seek a per-bicycle-mile reduction over the
next 20 years.
6. Work with local advocacy organizations and other
stakeholders in the process of formulating bicycle master
plans for cities in the CVAG region.
7. Encourage public involvement in the planning and
implementation process by utilizing workshops, surveys, and
other means.
8. Ensure that disadvantaged communities and neighborhoods
have ample opportunity to participate in public involvement.
Objective B
Complete a network of bikeways that is feasible, fundable, and
serves bicyclists’ needs, especially for travel to employment centers,
schools, commercial districts, transit stations, and recreational
destinations.
Objective B Policy Guidelines
1. Seek funding for bikeway projects through current local,
regional, state, and federal funding programs. Encourage
multijurisdictional funding applications.
2. Develop and fund a wayfinding signing system for the
bikeway network.
3. Coordinate with local jurisdictions and developers in the
Coachella and Palo Verde Valleys to ensure that
appropriate opportunities for bicycle connections are
planned, constructed, and maintained.
4. Recognize and accommodate other key activities on
shared-use paths, such as pedestrian and NEV uses.
5. Implement the CV Link Conceptual Master Plan project to
create a long distance cycling corridor as an alternate to
State Route 111 to provide for valley-wide connectivity
Page 3-3
and for long distance commuting and recreational
opportunities for bicyclists of varying skill levels.
6. Provide connections to regional paths that serve adjacent
areas, such as Desert Center and Blythe, the Salton Sea
Basin, the Yucca Valley area, and the San Gorgonio Pass
area.
7. Develop and update a regional map showing all bikeways
in the Coachella and Palo Verde Valleys and identify major
activity centers on it that are accessible via the bikeway
network.
8. Encourage local agencies to adopt standards for
construction of new roadways that incorporate bikeways.
9. Encourage local agencies to seek opportunities to
implement new bikeway types including wide, colored,
buffered, and protected bike lanes to further enhance the
experience of riding on local streets.
Objective C
Maintain and improve the quality, operation, and integrity of the
bikeway network and facilities.
Objective C Policy Guidelines
1. Encourage local agencies to undertake routine
maintenance of the bikeway network and facilities, such as
sweeping bicycle lanes, routinely repairing surfaces, and
replacing signs, as funding and priorities allow.
2. Encourage local agencies to ensure that repair and
construction of transportation facilities minimize
disruption to the cycling environment to the extent
practical.
3. Provide designs that ensure the safety of bicyclists and
others who use shared-use paths.
4. Encourage local agencies to eliminate hazards such as
unsafe drainage grates, poor drainage, dangerous railroad
track crossings, etc.
5. Encourage local agencies to establish or incorporate
advisory committees that meet regularly and address
bicycle issues.
Objective D
Provide short- and long-term bicycle parking in employment and
commercial areas, in multifamily housing, at schools, and at
recreation and transit facilities.
Objective D Policy Guidelines
1. Encourage local agencies to consider adopting zoning code
ordinances or other developer requirements for safe,
secure bicycle parking facilities as part of new development
projects.
2. Fund and encourage local agencies to install short- and
long-term bicycle parking in the public right-of-way.
3. Encourage local agencies to work with area elementary,
middle, and high schools to promote bicycle commuting
and to assist in purchasing and siting long- and short-term
bicycle parking.
4. Encourage local agencies to consider adopting zoning or
developer requirements for clothing lockers and showers
in new buildings.
5. Encourage local agencies to require bicycle parking at
major events to help mitigate traffic and parking impacts.
Page 3-4
6. Fund long- and short-term parking facilities at intermodal
centers, such as at the two Amtrak stations and at major
transit stops.
7. Seek funds to initiate and operate bike-sharing systems.
Objective E
Increase the number of bicycle-transit trips.
Objective E Policy Guidelines
1. Support and promote bicycle use on the SunLine Transit
system in the Coachella Valley.
2. Assist transit providers in maintaining existing bicycle
racks and providing lockers in the transit system to
encourage bicycle use.
3. Encourage local agencies to consider bike rental
opportunities in downtown areas, at key recreation
destinations, and in other locations where visitors are
entering the Coachella and Palo Verde Valleys.
4. Support the development of bike-sharing systems that
connect to recreation destinations and bus stops.
5. Encourage SunLine Transit to monitor bicycle utilization
on transit buses to ensure that adequate capacity is
available for users.
Objective F
Develop and implement education and encouragement plans aimed
at youth, adult cyclists, pedestrians, and motorists. Increase public
awareness of the benefits of bicycling and of available resources
and facilities.
Objective F Policy Guidelines
1. Encourage local agencies to develop adult and youth
bicycle and pedestrian education, encouragement, and
safety programs. These programs could be provided at
schools, senior centers, and recreational areas.
2. Encourage local agencies to market the health benefits of
bicycling.
3. Encourage local agencies to market the natural landscape
and climate as incentives to travel by bicycle, especially for
visitors and recreational riders.
4. Encourage local agencies to educate motorists as to the
rights of bicyclists.
5. Encourage SunLine Transit to educate its bus drivers on
how to interact with bicyclists.
Objective G
Develop and implement a safety program with the development of
shared-use paths.
Objective G Policy Guidelines
1. Coordinate with local law enforcement to create a plan to
regularly patrol shared-use paths.
2. Post a hotline telephone number along paths to provide
security and a quick response to incidents by appropriate
public agencies and services.
3. Encourage local agencies to collaborate with law
enforcement on appropriate designs that enhance the
safety of paths as they are developed.
Page 3-5
GOAL 2: THE PEDESTRIAN REALM
Provide a safe, convenient, and friendly environment for pedestrian
movement in the Coachella and Palo Verde Valleys that includes all
users of the pedestrian environment, such as older adults, children,
persons with disabilities, tourists, and others.
The following objectives address these goals and provide guidelines
for local jurisdictions to follow. More detailed plans for
implementation of these goals and objectives are contained in the
following sections.
Goal 2 Objectives
Objective A
Implement Chapter 6 of the ATP that recommends pedestrian
facilities near five major transit hubs.
Objective A Policy Guidelines
1. Seek funding for pedestrian projects identified in the ATP.
2. Maintain pedestrian projects identified in the ATP.
Objective B
Plan improvements so that people can walk throughout the
Coachella and Palo Verde Valleys.
Objective B Policy Guidelines
1. Develop plans for projects that improve pedestrian
crossings and close missing sidewalk gaps throughout the
Coachella and Palo Verde Valleys.
2. Encourage public involvement in the planning and
implementation process by utilizing workshops, surveys,
and other means.
3. Ensure that disadvantaged communities have ample
opportunity to provide input into planning processes and
that their needs are prioritized.
4. Adopt guidelines and requirements that encourage
developers to plan for pedestrian-friendly designs in new
developments and other future needs of the city.
5. Encourage local jurisdictions to develop and implement
Safe Routes to School plans for all of their schools.
6. Seek funding for planned pedestrian projects.
7. Whenever any modifications are made to streets or
intersections, integrate and prioritize the needs of people
who would walk there.
Objective C
Implement pedestrian designs that encourage walking and
contribute to a positive walking environment for all people.
Objective C Policy Guidelines
1. Encourage local jurisdictions to adopt street design
guidelines and standards that integrate the needs of
pedestrians.
2. Encourage local jurisdictions to adopt sidewalk design
guidelines that include the “four-zone” (curb, furniture,
pedestrian, frontage) system.
3. Encourage local jurisdictions to adopt street network
design standards that require short, interconnected blocks
in new development.
4. All pedestrian facilities and designs should be accessible to
everyone and should meet the standards of the Americans
with Disabilities Act.
Page 3-6
5. Sidewalks should be provided in residential and
commercial areas at a width sufficient to provide adequate
room for comfortable pedestrian movement.
6. Pedestrian activity should be planned and accommodated
in denser commercial districts. This will foster a more
walkable environment for pedestrians.
7. Commercial office buildings should provide for ground-
floor retail to attract pedestrian activity.
8. The main entrances to buildings and retail establishments
should be pedestrian oriented and located on the street,
and parking should be encouraged to be located in the
back of or underneath buildings.
9. Architectural design standards should be adopted for
commercial, retail, and multifamily residential
developments, as well as for commercial signage. Design
review boards could also be created to guide these new
standards.
10. Design standards should be used as a guide for attractive
landscaping and streetscape amenities. These standards
should be aesthetically pleasing, consistent, and compatible
with surrounding designs and uses.
11. Pedestrian amenities, such as street lighting, bus shelters,
street furniture, and refuse receptacles, should be added in
retail districts where they are absent.
12. Encourage farmers’ markets, arts and crafts, and other
events in public spaces.
Objective D
Ensure and enhance the safety of pedestrians at intersections and
other specific locations.
Objective D Policy Guidelines
1. Intersection designs should include crosswalks, adequate
lighting, and other features that enhance the safety of
pedestrians.
2. The number of driveways should be reduced in areas of
the city where there is a high level of pedestrian activity,
such as in a downtown business district.
3. Street lighting should be considered along streets.
4. Raised medians and crossing islands should be considered
when planning for pedestrian street crossings, especially
the crossing of a wide arterial street.
5. Consideration should be given to bulb-outs at intersections
to decrease the distance pedestrians need to travel across
an intersection.
Page 4-1
INTRODUCTION
This section of the Coachella Valley Association of Governments
Active Transportation Plan (ATP or Plan) contains the individual
cities’ bicycle plans and Riverside County’s bicycle plan for the
unincorporated areas of the Coachella and Palo Verde Valleys. The
elements of the plans fulfill the requirements of the Caltrans Active
Transportation Program. Compliance with these requirements and
adoption of this Plan makes jurisdictions eligible to use Active
Transportation Program funding. The requirements for bicycle
plans include the following:
1. Estimate the number of existing and estimated bicycle
trips that will result from plan implementation.
2. Include bicycle crash data.
3. Map and describe existing and proposed land uses.
4. Map and describe existing and proposed bikeways.
5. Map and describe existing and proposed bicycle parking.
6. Describe existing and proposed policies related to bicycle
parking in public locations.
Page 4-2
7. Map and describe existing and proposed bicycle links to
other transportation modes.
8. Describe bicycle and pedestrian wayfinding signage
programs.
9. Describe policies and procedures for maintaining existing
and proposed bicycle facilities.
10. Describe bicycle safety, education, and encouragement
programs.
11. Describe citizen and community involvement.
12. Describe coordination with neighboring jurisdictions.
13. Describe regional-level projects and programs and
priorities.
14. Describe past and future expenditures and bicycle facilities.
15. Develop planning-level cost estimates.
16. Develop an implementation plan and reporting process.
17. Introduce a resolution adopting the plan.
Although each plan is presented individually, the bicycle ridership
forecast and bicycle collision data analysis sections of the plans can
be found at the end of this introductory section. These two
analyses are handled with all the cities and the unincorporated
county areas together in the following two sections.
Each plan contains all the bikeway projects along with their length
and planning-level cost estimates. As noted in Chapter 5, these cost
estimates use average costs per mile. More detailed cost estimates
of each project will need to be conducted later, taking into account
the unique circumstances of each project. For planning purposes,
the per mile costs presented in Table 4-1 will be used.
Table 4-1. Per Mile Costs
Bikeway Type Cost per Mile*
Buffered Bike Lane $100,320
Buffered Bike/NEV Lane $100,320
Bike Lane $79,200
Bike/NEV Lane $79,200
Bike Lanes/Golf Cart Lanes $79,200
Bike Path $950,400
Bike/NEV Path $1,525,920
Bike Path/Golf Cart Path $1,525,920
Bike Route $36,960
Colored, Buffered Bike Lane $158,400
Colored, Buffered Bike/NEV Lane $195,360
Colored Bike Lane $132,000
Colored Bike/NEV Lane $174,240
Double-Colored, Buffered Bike Lane $158,400
Greenback Sharrow $68,640
Widened Existing Bike Lane $36,960
One-Way Cycletrack $844,800
Two-Way Cycletrack $1,071,840
Shared Lane Marking Street $26,400
Wayfinding Signage $5,280
Multipurpose Path/NEV Path $1,135,200
Multipurpose Path/Golf Cart Path $1,135,200
Multipurpose Path $1,092,960
Sidewalk Path/NEV Path $929,280
* Unit costs for CV Link segments are not shown here. They are detailed in the
CV Link Conceptual Master Plan.
The bicycle plans also establish a blueprint for jurisdictions to
implement policies and actions that can make their bicycling
environment friendlier. Bicycling is recognized as a growing mode
of transportation in most cities across the nation, and especially in
California. Whether for recreational or utilitarian trips, bicycling is
becoming more popular. The topography of the Coachella and
Palo Verde Valleys creates a relatively easy environment for
bicycling. Most destinations are accessible over relatively flat
terrain. More challenging routes are also available for the more
experienced recreational cyclist. The region’s climate is very
Page 4-3
conducive to bicycling in the mild winter months, and during the
hot summer months, many bicyclists ride at night when
temperatures are more moderate. Bicyclists in the Coachella and
Palo Verde Valleys could benefit from a more bicycle-friendly
physical environment to make cycling in the valleys a more
enjoyable and efficient mode of transportation for years to come.
The regional bikeways were selected from each of the local
jurisdictional bikeway plans applying the following criteria:
North–south, east–west corridors that traverse two or
more cities
Project segments from the 2015 CVAG TPPS
SunLine Transit routes
Key destinations such as commercial centers, colleges,
high-density residential development, and civic centers
CV Link and connections to it
CV Link segments are illustrated but detailed information and costs
can be found in the CV Link Conceptual Master Plan.
Existing and proposed improvements on tribal lands have been
included in the jurisdictional boundaries in which they are located.
BICYCLE COMMUTING
The ATP sets an objective to reach 5 percent of all trips to be
made by bicycle region-wide. This objective is also applicable to
each of the local jurisdictions. Although it is recognized that it is an
ambitious goal, the objective is achievable with complete
implementation of the ATP. According to the most recent US
Census 2013 American Community Survey estimates, the
percentage of bicycle commuters for each jurisdiction is as follows:
Blythe: 0.2%
Cathedral City: 0.2%
Coachella: 0.1%
Desert Hot Springs: 0.0%
Indian Wells: 0.0%
Indio: 0.3%
La Quinta: 1.4%
Palm Desert: 0.6%
Palm Springs: 0.9%
Rancho Mirage: 0.0%
Riverside County (includes entire county): 0.4%
Other cities in California and across the United States have reached
these the 5 percent goal by implementing the projects
recommended in the ATP.
CONSISTENCY WITH OTHER
TRANSPORTATION, AIR QUALITY, AND
ENERGY PLANS
Local and Regional Bikeway and Transportation
Plans
Since the ATP contains a regional bicycle plan, as well as local
bicycle plans for every jurisdiction, by process, local and regional
efforts are coordinated. Each of the local jurisdictions supplied
input on the ATP, and their comments were incorporated. The
Plan offers local jurisdictions the option to incorporate their bicycle
plans into their general plan circulation elements.
The ATP supports regional transportation goals, including those of
the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC), and the
Page 4-4
Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) put forth by the Southern
California Association of Governments (SCAG).
Regional Air Quality and Energy Plan Consistency
The South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD)
delegates its transportation planning to SCAG through its RTP
document, which identifies goals and objectives that promote
bicycling to reduce air emissions. An emphasis on utilitarian
bicycling, including supporting amenities and infrastructure, is an
important aspect of meeting these goals. Since the ATP contains
bikeways, bicycle parking, links to transit, and amenities, it
encourages utilitarian cycling and is consistent with SCAQMD
efforts.
By encouraging utilitarian bicycling, the ATP will also reduce
energy consumption. Because transportation consumes the largest
portion of consumed energy and many trips are within bicycling
distance, the potential to reduce energy consumption is significant.
Whitewater River Bike Path
The Coachella Valley Recreation and Parks District and the
Riverside County Park and Open-Space District plans for the
Whitewater River include a concept for a bike path the entire
length of the river in the Coachella Valley, with the exception of
several stretches in Rancho Mirage, Palm Desert, and Indian Wells.
The districts concluded that while challenges exist, particularly
where private entities own the land along the river, it may be
feasible to put a bike path along the river through some
cooperative planning efforts or developer agreements. However,
the Cities of Rancho Mirage, Palm Desert, and Indian Wells prefer
to leave such a bike path off their local bicycle plans in these areas,
so they are not shown in the ATP. This preference leaves open
future opportunities for landowners to negotiate with cities
regarding the bike path. The Whitewater River Bike Path was
followed by the Coachella Valley Link (CV Link) Conceptual
Master Plan as subsequently described.
Coachella Valley Link (CV Link) Conceptual
Master Plan
The CV Link Conceptual Master Plan is a 50-mile multimodal
transportation facility that will follow the Whitewater River
Channel. The CV Link will serve the needs of residents throughout
the Coachella Valley, spanning eight of the nine cities and three
tribal governments. The facility serves bicycles, pedestrians, and
low-speed neighborhood electric vehicles (LSEVs). LSEVs include
golf carts and neighborhood electric vehicles (NEVs) that can
travel up to 25 miles per hour. Future route segments include
connections to Desert Hot Springs, Mecca, and the Salton Sea.
The CV Link Conceptual Master Plan and proposed bicycle and
NEV connections to it were incorporated.
Neighborhood Electric Vehicle (NEV) Plan
The Neighborhood Electric Vehicle (NEV) Transportation Plan is
Volume IV of the CV Link Conceptual Master Plan. The NEV
Plan describes the specific duties required of NEV operators, the
current state of NEV development, and the future incorporation of
NEV infrastructure in the Coachella Valley region.
Where sufficient street width exists, bike lanes and NEV lanes
from the NEV Plan were incorporated in the Active
Transportation Plan.
BICYCLE CRASH ANALYSIS
Table 4-2 shows the number and rate of crashes (collisions in
Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System terminology)
involving bicyclists in each city and the unincorporated areas in the
CVAG region for the four most current years for which data is
Page 4-5
available: 2010, 2011, 2012, and 2013. This information was
gathered from the California Highway Patrol’s Transportation
Injury Mapping System (TIMS) website, which provides crash
information by jurisdiction. Population data was obtained from the
2010 U.S. Census. As the table shows, three jurisdictions (Indian
Wells, Palm Desert, and Palm Springs) had bicycle crash rates
higher than the state average. Further research would be needed to
determine the reasons for this higher rate. However, cities with
more cyclists generally have greater numbers of crashes. Further,
Palm Springs likely has many cycling tourists who may not be
familiar with the local environment. No other discernable patterns
emerge from this data.
Blythe, Cathedral City, Coachella, Desert Hot Springs, Indio, La
Quinta, Palm Desert, Palm Springs, and Riverside County have
bicycle safety education programs. Only Indian Wells and Rancho
Mirage do not provide these programs. The Riverside County
Department of Public Health provides bicycle and pedestrian
safety education at public schools in Desert Hot Springs, Cathedral
City, and the unincorporated areas of Thousand Palms, Thermal,
and Mecca through federal Safe Routes to School grant funding.
The police in all of the local jurisdictions enforce traffic laws,
including those impacting bicycles. Since no clear crash pattern
surfaced from the data, no conclusions can be drawn as to whether
bicycle safety education programs or police enforcement has had
any effect on the number of bicyclists involved in crashes.
Crash maps are shown in each local jurisdiction’s plan. Bike crash
data is provided in Table 4-2.
Table 4-2. Bicycle Crash Analysis
Jurisdiction
Number of Bicycle Involved Collisions
Total # of
Bicycle
Collisions
for 4 Years
Average
# of
Bicycle
Collisions
per Year
2010
Census
Population
Collisions per
1000
people/yr.
Index (relative
to state avg.
of 0.35/1000)
2010
(TIMS 2010)
2011
(TIMS 2011)
2012
(TIMS 2012)
2013
(TIMS 2013)
Fatality Injury Fatality Injury Fatality Injury Fatality Injury
Blythe 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 3 0.8 20,817 0.04 0.10
Cathedral City 0 9 0 10 0 6 1 12 38 9.5 51,200 0.19 0.53
Coachella 0 3 1 5 0 0 0 0 9 2.3 40,704 0.06 0.16
Desert Hot
Springs 0 2 1 0 0 4 0 4 11 2.8 25,938 0.11 0.30
Indian Wells 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 3 7 1.8 4,958 0.35 1.01
Indio 0 9 0 9 1 10 0 13 42 10.5 76,036 0.14 0.39
La Quinta 1 7 0 5 0 3 0 2 18 4.5 37,467 0.12 0.34
Palm Desert 0 17 0 16 0 15 0 23 71 17.8 48,445 0.37 1.05
Palm Springs 2 19 0 14 1 28 0 20 84 21.0 44,552 0.47 1.35
Rancho Mirage 0 0 1 2 2 4 0 3 12 3.0 17,218 0.17 0.50
Unincorporated
County 0 3 1 3 0 6 0 2 15 3.8 84,478 0.04 0.13
TOTAL 3 73 4 64 6 75 2 83 310 77.5 451,813 0.17 0.49
Page 4-6
DEFINITIONS
Bike Paths – Class I Bikeways
Class I bikeways are referred to as bike paths, shared-use paths, or
multipurpose trails. They provide for bicycle travel on a paved
right-of-way completely separated from any street or highway.
Other users may also be found on this type of facility (see Design
Guidelines in Chapter 8).
Bike Lanes – Class II Bikeways
A Class II bikeway provides a striped lane for one-way bicycle
travel on a street or highway (see Design Guidelines in Chapter 8).
Page 4-7
Bike Routes – Class III Bikeways
Class III bikeways are referred to as bike routes. A bike route
provides for shared use with pedestrian or motor vehicle traffic
(see Design Guidelines in Chapter 8).
Colored Bike Lanes
Colored bike lanes are simply bike lanes with an approved color
(see Design Guidelines in Chapter 8).
Buffered Bike Lanes
Buffered bike lanes provide a painted area between the bike lane
and either the travel lane or the parking lane. Double-buffered bike
lanes incorporate a painted buffer on both the travel lane and the
parking lane. These bike lanes may also be colored (see Design
Guidelines in Chapter 8).
Page 4-8
Protected Bike Lanes
Protected bike lanes provide a physical barrier between the bike
lane and other lanes. If there is on-street parking, the lane is placed
between the sidewalk and the parking area. Protected bike lanes
may be one-way or two-way. They may also be at the level of the
street, at the level of the sidewalk, or between the two (see Design
Guidelines in Chapter 8).
Greenback Sharrows
Greenback sharrows are a more prominent shared lane marking
than the standard shared lane marking. Prominence may be
achieved through augmentation of the shared lane marking with
side lines, a larger stencil, more frequent placement, and/or paint
underneath (see Design Guidelines in Chapter 8).
Page 4-9
Paved Multipurpose Paths
Paved multipurpose paths are similar to Class I bike paths, but they
are intended for multiple users (bicycles, pedestrians, roller bladers,
and other non-motorized users) and do not meet Caltrans bike
path standards.
Sidewalk Paths
Sidewalk paths are wide sidewalks that can be used by joggers,
pedestrians, bicyclists, and other non-motorized users.
NEV Paths
NEV paths are paved off-street paths that permit use by
neighborhood electric vehicles (NEVs) and low-speed electric
vehicles (LSEVs) such as golf carts, as well as by bicycles and
pedestrians.
NEV Lanes
NEV lanes are striped lanes that permit use by NEVs and LSEVs
such as golf carts, as well as by bicycles.
Golf Cart Paths
Golf cart paths are paved off-street paths that permit use by golf
carts, bicycles, and pedestrians, but not by NEVs.
Page 4-10
Golf Cart/Bike Paths
Golf cart/bike paths are striped lanes that permit use by golf carts,
bicycles, and pedestrians, but not by NEVs.
Golf Cart/Bike Routes
Golf cart/bike routes are signed routes that permit both golf carts
and bicycles.
CITY OF BLYTHE
This page intentionally left blank
Page 4-11
CITY OF BLYTHE BICYCLE PLAN
With a year 2015 population of 18,909 per the California
Department of Finance, Blythe is a small city located in the Palo
Verde Valley adjacent to the Colorado River. The city has a grid
network of arterial streets that connect to the surrounding
agricultural unincorporated areas. The main arterial streets in the
city include Chanslor Way, Hobsonway, 6th, 10th, and 14th
Avenues, De Frain, Lovekin, and Intake Boulevards, Broadway,
and Main and 7th Streets. Most of Blythe’s destinations are located
in the downtown area along Hobsonway, Main Street, and
Broadway.
Land Use
Figure 4-1 shows the current and future land use patterns in Blythe.
The city consists primarily of low- to medium-density residential
and agricultural land uses. Commercial uses are located primarily
along Hobsonway. Future low-density residential is planned for the
undeveloped northeastern portion of the city. Agricultural uses are
planned for the future in many areas in the east and northwestern
portions of Blythe.
2/
1
6
/
2
0
1
6
J
N
M
:
\
M
d
a
t
a
\
1
4
4
8
3
7
\
G
I
S
\
M
X
D
\
A
c
t
i
v
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
\
L
a
n
d
U
s
e
\
C
V
A
G
B
l
y
t
h
e
L
a
n
d
U
s
e
.
m
x
d
CVAG ATP - Land UseCity of Blythe
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG
¯0 21
Miles
CITYNAME
Blythe
Land Use
Single Family Residential
Multi-Family Residential
Mobile Homes and Trailer Parks
General Office
Commercial and Services
Facilities
Education
Industrial
Mixed Commercial and Industrial
Mixed Residential and Commercial
Open Space and Recreation
Agriculture
ARZC Railroad
Colo
r
a
d
o
Riv
e
r
!"`$
CVAG ATP City of Blythe
Land Use
Figure 4-1
CVAG ATP City of BlytheCrash Map
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG, SWITRS Figure 4-2
¯0 21Miles
!"`$
!"`$
Color
a
d
o
Riv
e
r
""Bicycle Fatality XX Pedestrian Injury
""Bicycle Injury Proposed Bicycle FacilitiesExisting Bicycle FacilitiesARZC RailroadNote: SWITRS database does not provide coordinate data for 3 pedestriancrashes, therefore that data is not represented on this map.
YX Pedestrian Fatality
Page 4-14
Bikeways
Existing
Blythe currently has no existing bikeways.
Proposed
The City of Blythe has proposed a number of bikeway projects to
be included in this Plan. The projects are listed in Table 4-3.
Project costs are based on past expenditures for bikeways
throughout California and on feedback received from local
jurisdictions. Costs for individual projects will vary by location and
complexity.
Figure 4-3 shows existing and proposed bikeways, bicycle parking,
and amenities.
Table 4-3. City of Blythe Proposed Bikeway Projects
ID # Street/Path From To Class
Regionally
Significant?
Length
(mi.)
Estimated
Cost
BL01 Colorado River Blythe Northern city limit (6th Ave) Blythe Southern city limit (Parallel with
South end of Riviera Dr)
Bike path No 8.7 $8,562,470
BL02 Hobson Way Blythe Western city limit (2640 feet
west of Buck Blvd)
950 feet east of Summer Dr Colored
bike lanes
No 9.3 $1,227,600
BL03 4th Ave De Frain Blvd. Blythe Eastern city limit (2660 feet west of
N Lovekin Blvd)
Bike lanes No 0.5 $39,600
BL04 Chanslor Way Ehlers Blvd. to Main St El Dorado St to Olive Lake Blvd. Bike lanes No 1.4 $110,880
BL05 Chanslor Way Main St El Dorado St Bike route No 1.1 $40,656
BL06 De Frain Blvd. 4th Ave Blythe Western city limit (860 feet west of
De Frain Blvd)
Bike path No 2.8 $2,755,738
BL07 Lovekin Blvd. 8th Ave Blythe Southern city limit (Commercial St) Bike lanes No 3.3 $261,360
BL08 6th Ave Blythe Western city limit (2220 feet
west of College Dr)
Blythe Eastern city limit (1320 feet east of
De Frain Blvd)
Bike lanes No 2.5 $198,000
BL09 Wells Rd 4th Ave De Frain Blvd. Bike lanes No 1.3 $102,960
BL10 14th Ave Blythe Western city limit (Solano Ave) 7th St/C&D Blvd. Bike routes No 1.1 $40,656
BL11 14th Ave 7th St Intake Blvd. Bike lanes No 1.0 $79,200
BL12 Intake Blvd. 10th Ave 16th St./Seeley Ave Bike lanes No 3.0 $237,600
BL13 Broadway 10th Ave Murphy St Bike lanes No 1.4 $110,880
BL14 Broadway Murphy St Hobsonway Greenback
sharrows
No 0.1 $6,864
BL15 Broadway Hobsonway Blythe Southern city limit (340 feet south
of entrance to Broadway Manor
Apartments)
Bike lanes No 0.6 $47,520
BL16 7th St/C&D Blvd. 10th Ave I-10 Freeway Bike lanes No 1.7 $134,640
BL17 Barnard St AZ&CA Railroad Corridor 2nd St Bike lanes No 0.4 $31,680
Table 4-3, continued
Page 4-15
ID # Street/Path From To Class
Regionally
Significant?
Length
(mi.)
Estimated
Cost
BL18 Barnard St Lovekin Blvd to AZ&CA Railroad
Corridor
2nd St to Tesoro Ln. Bike route No 1.1 $40,656
BL19 C Canal Path 8th Ave at AZ & CA Railroad Corridor .25 miles north of Chanslor Way Bike path No 2.1 $2,066,803
BL20 Quail Run Palo Verde Community College Wells Rd Bike path No 1.4 $1,377,869
BL21A AZ&CA Railroad
Corridor
Blythe Northern city limit (8th Ave) Blythe Southern city limit (690 feet south
of W 14th Ave)
Bike path No 3.2 $3,149,414
BL22 Main St Chanslor Way 14th Ave Bike lanes No 1.0 $79,200
BL23 2nd St Chanslor Way Hobson Way Bike lanes No 0.5 $39,600
BL24 8th Ave Blythe Western city limit (1340 feet
west of De Frain Blvd)
Blythe Eastern city limit (2730 feet east of
Lovekin Blvd)
Bike lanes No 1.8 $142,560
BL25 Olive Lake Blvd. 10th Ave Hobson Way Bike lanes No 1.5 $118,800
BL26 7th St/C&D Blvd. I-10 Freeway Blythe Southern city limit (1330 feet south
of 14th Ave)
Bike route No 0.5 $18,480
BL27 10th Ave Blythe Western city limit (930 feet
west of De Frain Blvd)
Olive Lake Blvd. Bike lanes No 4.2 $332,640
BL28 7th St/C&D Blvd. 10th Ave Hobson Way Bike path No 1.5 $1,476,288
BL29 Arrowhead Blvd. Riverside Ave Blythe Southern city limit (I-10) Bike lanes No 0.8 $63,360
BL30 Hwy 78/Neighbours
Blvd.
Blythe Northern city limit (1330 feet
north of Riverside Ave)
Blythe Southern city limit (200 feet north
of 14th Ave)
Bike lanes No 1.2 $95,040
BL31 Riverside Ave Neighbours Blvd. Arrowhead Blvd. Bike lanes No 1.0 $79,200
RIV134 Ave 8 2630 feet west of N C and D Blvd 5300 feet east of SR-95 Bike lanes No 2.1 $166,320
RIV135 Seeley Ave SR-78 Intake Blvd. Bike lanes No 5.0 $396,000
WSBL Wayfinding Signage $276,000
BPBL Bicycle Parking Program $25,000
TOTAL $23,931,534
Colo
r
a
d
o
Riv
e
r
ARZCRR
ARZC
RR
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG
¯0 21Miles
!"`$
""6""6
""10
""6
""10
""6
""6
""10
""16
""16
""6 ""6
""10 ""6
""16
""16
""16
""1
""6
""6
""6
""6""6
""6
""6
""1
""10
""1
!!3
""17
""6!"`$
CVAG ATP City of BlytheLocal Network
Figure 4-3
"#= Proposed Index
"8"7
"2
"6
"9
"10
"11
"12
"13
"14
"16
"17
"18
"19
"20
"3
"1
"4
Bike path
Bike/NEV pathMultipurpose path
Multipurpose NEV pathBike lane
Bike/NEV lane
Buffered bike laneBuffered bike/NEV lane
Colored bike laneColored bike/NEV lane
Colored buffered bike laneColored buffered bike/NEV lane
Double colored buffered bike lane
Bike routeGreenback sharrows
Bike path (partial)Bike lanes (partial)
Golf path
"21
"22Golf lane
N/A
Proposed Bicycle Facilities Existing Bicycle Facilities
Bike path
Multipurpose path
Sidewalk pathBike lane
Buffered bike lane
Bike route
Greenback sharrowsBike path (partial)
(!#= Existing Index
(!1
(!3
(!6
(!8
(!5
(!16
(!17
(!18
Colored buffered bike lane
Colored buffered bike lane/NEV lane(!12
(!13
Bike lanes (partial)Golf path(!19
(!20
Proposed Transit Bike Parking
Bike Parking
*#Proposed
*#ExistingBike Amenities
*#Proposed
#Existing
*#Bike Locker
##Bike Rack
CVAG ATP Facilities Identifier
City of Blythe
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG
¯0 21
Miles
See CVAG ATP Chapter 4
Table for Facility ID Reference
Figure 4-3a
Proposed Bicycle Facilities
Existing Bicycle Facilities
!!
City of Blythe
Local Network with ATP IDs
Page 4-18
Bicycle Parking
Existing
No existing bicycle parking facilities have been identified in Blythe.
Proposed
The City of Blythe has no requirements for bicycle parking in new
buildings. The City will apply to fund a public bicycle parking
program at retail and civic locations as well as at all schools. Part of
this program will include shelters to shade bicycles from the sun.
Links to Other Transportation Modes
The city is served by Palo Verde Valley Transit buses, all of which
have bicycle racks.
Bicycle Amenities
Although no existing shower and clothing locker facilities have
been identified, the City may pursue these facilities in the future,
but none are planned now. The City of Blythe has no requirements
for bicycle amenities in new buildings.
Bicycle Safety Education and Police Enforcement
The Blythe Police Department provides bicycle safety education to
K–8 students at the schools. Every year, each student attends either
an assembly or a class where this education is provided.
Occasionally, the Police Department holds bicycle rodeos to give
children practice on their bicycles outside. In the bike rodeo
setting, parents also learn about bicycle safety. The Police
Department also gives free bicycle helmets to any child who needs
one. In addition, the City of Blythe won a federal Safe Routes to
School grant, part of which has been used to enhance the bicycle
safety curriculum since 2010. The City will continue to apply for
funding for Safe Routes to School programs.
Wayfinding Signage
The City will seek funds for a citywide bikeway wayfinding signage
program. The wayfinding signage will connect with CV Link and
with downtown.
Past Expenditures for Bicycle Facilities
The City of Blythe has not identified any past expenditures for
bicycle facilities in the past five years.
Maintenance Policies
The City of Blythe maintains the bikeways along with the streets.
Other Related Policies
The City of Blythe has no other related policies.
Coordination with Neighboring Jurisdictions
Since this Plan covers the entire Coachella and Palo Verde Valleys,
the plans of neighboring cities and the unincorporated county were
coordinated to ensure links.
Future Financial Needs
The City of Blythe has the following future financial needs:
Total proposed bikeways 69.1 miles
Total proposed bikeways cost $23,630,534
Bicycle parking program $25,000
Wayfinding signage $276,000
Total capital financial need $23,931,534
Annual bike path maintenance budget
19.7 miles, $197,000/year
Safe Routes to School program $50,000/year
Grant Reporting Policies
The City of Blythe follows specific reporting guidelines for each
grant it receives.
CITY OF CATHEDRAL CITY
This page intentionally left blank
Page 4-19
CITY OF CATHEDRAL CITY
BICYCLE PLAN
With a year 2015 population of 52,903 per the California
Department of Finance, Cathedral City is a city that has undergone
significant residential development over the past 25 years. The city
has a network of arterial streets that connects to its two
neighboring cities, Palm Springs and Rancho Mirage. Arterial
streets include Date Palm and Cathedral Canyon Drives, Vista
Chino and Ramon Roads, and Dinah Shore and East Palm Canyon
Drives. Most of Cathedral City’s destinations are located along the
arterial street network.
Land Use
Figure 4-4 shows the current and future land use patterns in
Cathedral City. The city consists primarily of medium- and low-
density residential, with some existing retail and office uses located
along East Palm Canyon Drive, Ramon Road, and Date Palm
Drive. Some industrial uses are located along Perez Road. Future
residential, industrial, and commercial development is planned near
Interstate 10 (I-10), and both commercial and residential
development is planned for areas in the northern part of the city.
!"`$
AÙ
!"`$
!"`$
2/1
6
/
2
0
1
6
J
N
M
:
\
M
d
a
t
a
\
1
4
4
8
3
7
\
G
I
S
\
M
X
D
\
A
c
t
i
v
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
\
L
a
n
d
U
s
e
\
C
V
A
G
C
c
i
t
y
L
a
n
d
U
s
e
.
m
x
d
CVAG ATP - Land UseCity of Cathedral City
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG
City Limits
Cathedral City
Land Use
Single Family Residential
Multi-Family Residential
Mixed Residential
Commercial and Services
Facilities
Education
Industrial
Transportation, Communications, and Utilities
Mixed Residential and Commercial
Open Space and Recreation
Water
Specific Plan
Undevelopable or Protected Land
Union Pacific Railroad
¯0 21
Miles
CVAG ATP City of Cathedral City
Land Use
Figure 4-4
!"`$
AÙ
!"`$
!"`$
5/2
0
/
2
0
1
6
J
N
M
:
\
M
d
a
t
a
\
1
4
4
8
3
7
\
G
I
S
\
M
X
D
\
A
c
t
i
v
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
\
C
r
a
s
h
M
a
p
s
f
r
o
m
B
r
i
a
n
\
C
V
A
G
A
T
P
C
a
t
h
e
d
r
a
l
C
i
t
y
C
r
a
s
h
B
a
s
i
c
A
T
P
.
m
x
d
CVAG ATP City of Cathedral CityCrash Map
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG, SWITRS Figure 4-5
¯0 21Miles
Note: SWITRS database does not provide coordinate data for 10 pedestriancrashes and 5 bicycle crashes, therefore that data is not represented on this map.
YX Pedestrian Fatality
""Bicycle Fatality XX Pedestrian Injury
""Bicycle Injury Proposed Bicycle FacilitiesExisting Bicycle FacilitiesUnion Pacific Railroad
Page 4-22
Bikeways
Existing
Cathedral City currently has one Class I (bike path) and six Class II
(bike lane) bikeways, totaling 10 miles in length. Table 4-4 lists each
bikeway’s location and length.
Proposed
Cathedral City bikeway projects shown in Table 4-5 are included in
this Plan. Project costs are based on past expenditures for bikeways
throughout California and on feedback received from local
jurisdictions. Costs for individual projects will vary by location and
complexity.
Figure 4-6 shows existing and proposed bikeways, bicycle parking,
and amenities.
Table 4-4. City of Cathedral City Existing Bikeways
ID # Street/Path From To Class
Regionally
Significant?
Length
(mi.)
CC01E Whitewater River (south
Bank)
Cathedral Canyon Dr East of Date Palm Dr Bike path No 0.7
CC02E Vista Chino Rd Cathedral City Western city limit (1160 feet west of
Carmela Dr)
Date Palm Dr Bike lanes Yes 2.0
CC03E 30th Ave Landau Blvd. Santoro Dr Bike lanes Yes 1.5
CC05E Landau Blvd. Vista Chino Rd Ramon Rd Bike lanes Yes 2.3
CC06E Cathedral Canyon Dr Ramon Rd Hwy 111 Bike lanes Yes 2.4
CC07E Victoria Dr Date Palm Dr Plumley Rd Bike lanes Yes 0.5
PG03E Palm Dr Desert Hot Springs City Limit (Camino Aventura) I-10 Bike lanes Yes 2.1
RM107E Da Vall Dr 30th Ave Frank Sinatra Dr Bike path Yes 4.0
RM108E DaVall Dr 30th Ave Frank Sinatra Dr Bike lanes
(partial)
Yes 4.0
RM114E Gerald Ford Dr Plumley Rd Monterey Ave Bike lanes
(partial)
Yes 3.5
RM115E Gerald Ford Dr Plumley Rd Monterey Ave Bike path Yes 3.5
RM124E Plumley Rd Dinah Shore Dr Converse Rd Bike path No 0.8
RM125E Ramon Rd Da Vall Dr Los Alamos Dr Bike lanes
(partial)
Yes 1.0
RM126E Ramon Rd Da Vall Dr Los Alamos Bike path Yes 1.0
Page 4-23
Table 4-5. City of Cathedral City Proposed Bikeway Projects
ID # Street/Path From To Class
Regionally
Significant?
Length
(mi.)
Estimated
Cost
AMCC Diamond Rd San Joaquin Rd Whitewater River Multipurpose Path Yes 0.3 $300,960
CC08 Dinah Shore Dr Cathedral Western city limit
(1450 feet west of Whispering
Palms Trail)
Da Vall Dr Greenback sharrows Yes 2.0 $137,280
CC09 Date Palm Dr Perez Rd Hwy 111 Buffered bike lanes Yes 0.3 $30,096
CC10 Whitewater River and
Abrams-Butler Trails
Whitewater Confluence with
Tahquitz Creek
Country Club Dr Bike path/NEV path Yes 4.1 N/A (CV Link)
CC11 E. Palm Canyon Dr Golf Club Dr. Cathedral Canyon Dr Colored buffered bike lanes Yes 1.3 $205,920
CC13 E. Palm Canyon Dr Cathedral Canyon Dr Date Palm Dr Greenback sharrows Yes 0.5 $34,320
CC14 E. Palm Canyon Dr Date Palm Dr Cathedral City Eastern city
limit (80 feet East of Buddy
Rogers Ave)
Colored buffered bike lanes Yes 0.4 $63,360
CC15 Date Palm Dr Varner Rd Ramon Rd Buffered bike lanes (would
require a road diet where 6
lanes)
Yes 3.2 $321,024
CC16 Date Palm Dr Ramon Rd 35th Ave Buffered bike lanes (would
require a road diet where 6
lanes)/NEV
Yes 1.4 $140,448
CC17 Date Palm Dr 35th Ave Perez Rd Buffered bike lanes (would
require a road diet where 6
lanes)/NEV lanes
Yes 0.9 $90,288
CC18 Perez Rd East Palm Canyon Dr Date Palm Dr Bike lanes Yes 1.1 $87,120
CC19 Cathedral Canyon Dr Ramon Rd Dinah Shore Bike lanes/NEV lanes Yes 1.0 $79,200
CC20 Cathedral Canyon Dr Dinah Shore Dr Whitewater River Multipurpose path/NEV path Yes 0.8 $1,022,208
CC21 Cathedral Canyon Dr Canyon Shores Dr E. Palm Canyon Dr /Hwy
111
Bike path/NEV path Yes 0.6 $1,039,104
CC22 30th Ave Santoro Dr Da Vall Dr Bike lanes Yes 0.5 $39,600
CC23 Landau Blvd. Vista Chino Mihalyo Rd Bike lanes Yes 1.7 $134,640
CC24 Varner Rd Palm Dr Cathedral City Eastern city
limit (6310 feet east of
Date Palm Dr)
Bike lanes Yes 4.6 $364,320
CC25 Long Canyon Path Cathedral City Northern city limit
(1350 feet north of Varner Rd)
I-10 parallel path Bike path Yes 1.8 $1,824,768
CC27 Mihalyo Rd Palm Dr Da Vall Dr Bike lanes No 4.5 $356,400
CC28 Ramon Rd West City Limit (Landau Blvd.) East City Limit (Da Vall Dr) Colored bike lanes Yes 2.0 $264,000
CC29 Gerald Ford Dr Date Palm Dr Cathedral City Eastern city
limit (Plumley Rd)
Colored bike lanes Yes 0.5 $66,000
CC30 Da Vall Dr Varner Rd. Dinah Shore Dr Bike lanes Yes 3.3 $261,360
CC31 McCallum Way Landau Blvd. Avenida Los Ninos Bike lanes/NEV lanes No 0.9 $71,280
CC32 McCallum Way Avenida Los Ninos DaVall Dr Bike lanes Yes 1.1 $87,120
Table 4-5, continued
Page 4-24
ID # Street/Path From To Class
Regionally
Significant?
Length
(mi.)
Estimated
Cost
CCECC Cathedral Canyon
Channel East*
Whitewater River 2 mi. southwest along
Cathedral Canyon Channel
East
Bike lanes/NEV lanes Yes 2.0 $158,400
RM33 Da Vall Dr Ramon Rd Dinah Shore Dr Bike lanes Yes 1.0 $79,200
SJDCC San Joaquin Rd Diamond Rd Southern end of golf course Bike lanes Yes 1.0 $79,200
PG03 Palm Dr Dillon Rd I-10 Fwy. Multipurpose path/NEV path Yes 3.8 $4,602,682
PS167 La Verne Way S. Palm Canyon Dr S. Sunrise Way Buffered bike lanes (with
road diet)
No 1.1 $110,352
PS196 Ramon Rd Gene Autry Trail San Luis Rey Rd Greenback sharrows Yes 0.3 $17,846
PS196A Ramon Rd Gene Autry Trail San Luis Rey Rd Colored bike lanes Yes 0.3 $34,320
PS197 Ramon Rd San Luis Rey Rd Crossley Rd Greenback sharrows Yes 0.2 $16,474
PS197A Ramon Rd San Luis Rey Rd Crossley Rd Colored buffered bike
lanes/NEV lanes
Yes 0.2 $46,886
PS203 San Luis Rey Rd Mission Dr E. Ramon Rd Bike route Yes 0.3 $11,088
PS203A San Luis Rey Rd Mission Dr E. Ramon Rd Buffered bike lanes Yes 0.3 $30,096
PS56 Ramon Rd Crossley Rd Palm Springs East City Limit
(Landau Blvd.)
Greenback sharrows Yes 0.5 $34,320
PS56A Ramon Rd Crossley Rd Palm Springs East City Limit
(Landau Blvd.)
Colored buffered bike lanes Yes 0.5 $79,200
PS61 Whitewater River Vista Chino Tahquitz Creek Bike path/NEV path Yes 4.3 N/A (CV Link)
RIV04 Mountain View Rd 20th Ave Varner Rd Bike lanes Yes 1.3 $102,960
RIV06 Bob Hope Dr Varner Rd Ramon Rd Buffered bike lanes Yes 0.5 $50,160
RIV25 Varner Rd Da Vall Dr Indio western city limit
(1020 feet west of 40th
Ave)
Bike lanes Yes 11.0 $871,200
RM134 DaVall Dr 30th Ave Frank Sinatra Dr Bike lanes (partial)** Yes 4.0 $158,404
RM137 Gerald Ford Dr Plumley Rd Monterey Ave Bike lanes (partial)** Yes 3.5 $139,633
RM148 Ramon Rd Da Vall Dr Los Alamos Dr Bike lanes (partial)** Yes 1.0 $39,628
WSCC Wayfinding Signage $304,000
BPCC Bicycle Parking Program $25,000
TOTAL $14,011,864
!"`$
AÙ
!"`$
!"`$
AÌ
UNION
P
A
C
I
F
I
C
R
R
4/1
7
/
2
0
1
7
J
N
M
:
\
M
d
a
t
a
\
1
4
4
8
3
7
\
G
I
S
\
M
X
D
\
A
c
t
i
v
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
\
A
T
P
C
i
t
y
M
a
p
s
\
L
o
c
a
l
M
X
D
s
F
i
n
a
l
\
L
o
c
a
l
M
a
p
s
N
o
I
D
N
e
w
S
y
m
b
o
l
o
g
y
9
_
1
4
_
1
6
\
C
V
A
G
A
T
P
C
a
t
h
e
d
r
a
l
C
i
t
y
n
o
I
D
U
p
d
a
t
e
.
m
x
d
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG
¯0 21Miles
CVAG ATP City of Cathedral CityLocal Network
Figure 4-6
"#= Proposed Index
"8"7
"2
"6
"9
"10
"11
"12
"13
"14
"16
"17
"18
"19
"20
"3
"1
"4
Bike path
Bike/NEV path
Multipurpose path
Multipurpose NEV path
Bike laneBike/NEV lane
Buffered bike lane
Buffered bike/NEV lane
Colored bike lane
Colored bike/NEV laneColored buffered bike lane
Colored buffered bike/NEV laneDouble colored buffered bike lane
Bike route
Greenback sharrowsBike path (partial)
Bike lanes (partial)Golf path
"21
"22Golf lane
N/A
Proposed Bicycle Facilities Existing Bicycle Facilities
Bike pathMultipurpose path
Sidewalk pathBike lane
Buffered bike lane
Bike route
Greenback sharrows
Bike path (partial)
(!#= Existing Index
(!1
(!3
(!6
(!8
(!5
(!16
(!17
(!18
Colored buffered bike laneColored buffered bike lane/NEV lane(!12
(!13
Bike lanes (partial)
Golf path(!19
(!20
Proposed Transit Bike Parking
Bike Parking
*#Proposed
*#ExistingBike Amenities
*#Proposed
#Existing
*#Bike Locker
##Bike Rack
CVAG ATP Facilities Identifier
City of Cathedral City
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG
¯0 21
Miles
See CVAG ATP Chapter 4
Table for Facility ID Reference
Proposed Bicycle Facilities
Existing Bicycle Facilities
!!
City of Cathedral City
Local Network with ATP IDs
Figure 4-6a
Page 4-27
Bicycle Parking
Existing
Cathedral City has identified several locations where bicycle
parking facilities exist. They are listed below.
City Hall
Several racks in the downtown area
Cathedral City Marketplace Shopping Center
Golden Mile Shopping Center
Canyon Plaza Shopping Center
Cathedral City High School
Rio Vista Elementary School
30th Avenue Soccer Park (north side of 30th Avenue east
of San Eljay Avenue)
Proposed
The City indicates that future bicycle parking facilities will be
sought by working with developers to provide facilities on a case-
by-case basis. Cathedral City will also apply for funding under the
ATP program to assist employers in providing bicycle parking for
their employees. Specific locations identified for proposed bicycle
parking include the following:
Cathedral City Senior Center
Along State Route 111 east of Date Palm Drive in front of
stores and other businesses
Links to Other Transportation Modes
The city is served by SunLine Transit, which has bicycle racks on
every bus in its fleet. The older SunLine bus racks hold two
bicycles, but the new state-of-the-art racks will hold three bicycles
per bus and are very convenient to use for the bicyclist. No transit
stations or park-and-ride facilities currently exist in the city or are
planned in the future.
Bike racks and/or bike lockers are proposed by SunLine Transit at
selected bus stop locations in the city, as shown in Table 4-6.
Table 4-6. Proposed Bus Stop Locations for Bike Racks and/or
Bike Lockers in Cathedral City
Line(s) Street
Cross
Street
Stop
# Direction Position*
Facility
Type
32 Vista
Chino
Landau
Blvd 160 EB NS Bike rack
32 Vista
Chino
Landau
Blvd 167 WB FS Bike rack
31/
111 B St Buddy
Rogers 147 WB NS Bike locker
32 Date
Palm Dr 30th Ave 274 SB FS Bike rack
32 30th
Ave
Date
Palm Dr 278 WB FS Bike rack
30 Date
Palm Dr
Ramon
Rd 517 SB FS Bike rack
30 Ramon
Rd
Date
Palm Dr 596 WB FS Bike rack
* Position refers to the near side (NS) or far side (FS) of the intersection
Bicycle Amenities
The City of Cathedral City currently has identified one shower and
locker facility at City Hall that may be used by employees who
bicycle to work. No other facilities have been identified, and none
are planned in the future.
Bicycle Safety Education and Police Enforcement
Riverside County Department of Public Health won a federal Safe
Routes to School grant in 2011 (Cycle 3) and provided bicycle and
Page 4-28
pedestrian safety education at public schools in Cathedral City. The
grant was used to:
hire a Safe Routes to School coordinator;
conduct safety education assemblies;
host International Walk to School Days, bike rodeos,
Walking School Buses, and Walking Wednesdays events;
provide printed materials and conduct Safe Routes to
School workshops; and
increase law enforcement during school pickup and drop-
off times.
The program also requests donations from local establishments to
provide prizes for students who walk to school. The program
started in federal Fiscal Year 2010–2011.
The Cathedral City Police Department enforces all traffic laws for
bicycles and motor vehicles as part of regular duties. Police officers
ticket violators as they see them. This includes bicyclists who break
traffic laws, as well as motorists who disobey traffic laws and make
the cycling environment more dangerous. The level of enforcement
depends on the availability of officers. The Police Department also
responds to particular needs and problems as they arise. In
addition, the department dispatches a fleet of bicycle-mounted
officers during special events in the city. These officers have had
special training in bicycle safety and assist in enforcing traffic laws.
The Police Department also strictly enforces helmet laws, especially
among young bicyclists.
The City will continue to apply for funds to operate Safe Routes to
School and bicycle safety education programs.
Wayfinding Signage
The City will seek funds for a citywide bikeway wayfinding signage
program. The wayfinding signage will connect with CV Link and
with downtown.
Past Funding for Bicycle Facilities
The City of Cathedral City received two Bicycle Transportation
Account funds totaling $700,000 for a bike path along Whitewater
River between Vista Chino and Ramon Road.
The Riverside County Department of Public Health won a
$500,000 federal Safe Routes to School grant to provide bicycle
and pedestrian safety education at public schools in Cathedral City
and unincorporated Riverside County.
Maintenance Policies
The City of Cathedral City Department of Public Works has an
ongoing program, with restriping done approximately every four
years. The City resurfaces streets, replaces signs, and trims
vegetation as needed.
Other Related Policies
The City of Cathedral City currently has no Safe Routes to School
(SRTS) plan, but the City is in the process of updating its
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Transition Plan and
General Plan Circulation Element. The element will be prepared
with Complete Streets principles and is anticipated to be finished in
2016.
Coordination with Neighboring Jurisdictions
Since this Plan covers the entire Coachella and Palo Verde Valleys,
the plans of neighboring cities and the unincorporated county were
coordinated to ensure links.
Page 4-29
Future Financial Needs
The City of Cathedral City has the following future financial needs:
Total proposed bikeways 75.9 miles
Total proposed bikeways cost $13,682,864
Bicycle parking program $25,000
Wayfinding signage $304,000
Total capital financial need $14,011,864
Annual bike path maintenance budget
1.8 miles, $18,000/year
Annual Safe Routes to School program budget
$50,000/year
Grant Reporting Policies
The City of Cathedral City follows specific reporting guidelines for
each grant it receives.
Page 4-30
This page intentionally left blank
CITY OF C OACHELLA
This page intentionally left blank
Page 4-31
CITY OF COACHELLA BICYCLE PLAN
With a year 2015 population of 43,917 per the California
Department of Finance, Coachella is a small city in the southeast
corner of the Coachella Valley. The city has a grid network of
arterial streets that connect to its neighboring cities, Indio and La
Quinta, as well as to points south along State Routes 86 and 111,
which lead to the Salton Sea and the Imperial Valley. The main
arterial streets in the network include Grapefruit Boulevard/SR
111, Harrison Street, Avenues 50, 52, and 54, and Van Buren and
Tyler Streets. Most of Coachella’s destinations are located along the
arterial street network.
Land Use
Figure 4-7 shows the current and future land use patterns in
Coachella. The city consists primarily of low-density residential,
commercial, and industrial land uses. Most of the industrial uses are
located along the Southern Pacific railway corridor, and most of
the retail commercial is located along Harrison and 6th Streets as
well as along Grapefruit Boulevard/SR 111. Future commercial
development is planned near Interstate 10 and east of the
Whitewater River. A square-mile section of southwestern Coachella
is zoned for agricultural uses.
AVENUE 48
AVENUE
44
DRCARREONBLVD
AIRPORT BLVD
CA
L
H
O
U
N
S
T
AVENUE 52
VA
N
B
U
R
E
N
S
T
52ND AVE
JA
C
K
S
ON
S
T
AVENUE 49
AVENUE 51
AVENUE 54 54TH AVE
AVENUE 52
VAN
BUREN
ST
HA
R
R
I
S
O
N
S
T
HA
R
R
I
S
O
N
S
T
SH
A
D
Y
L
N
TY
L
E
R
S
T
GRA
P
E
F
R
U
I
T
B
L
V
D
GRA
P
E
F
R
U
I
T
B
L
V
D
FR
E
D
E
R
I
C
K
S
T
PO
L
K
S
T
PI
E
R
C
E
S
T
PO
L
K
S
T
TY
L
E
R
S
T
PO
L
K
S
T
AVENUE 50
INDUSTRIAL
WAY
AVENUE
51
!"`$
A¿
A¿AÙ
2/1
6
/
2
0
1
6
J
N
M
:
\
M
d
a
t
a
\
1
4
4
8
3
7
\
G
I
S
\
M
X
D
\
A
c
t
i
v
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
\
L
a
n
d
U
s
e
\
C
V
A
G
C
o
a
c
h
e
l
l
a
L
a
n
d
U
s
e
.
m
x
d
CVAG ATP - Land UseCity of Coachella
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG
City Limits
Coachella
Land Use
Single Family Residential
Multi-Family Residential
Commercial and Services
Facilities
Industrial
Transportation, Communications, and Utilities
Mixed Residential and Commercial
Open Space and Recreation
Union Pacific Railroad¯0 21
Miles
CVAG ATP City of Coachella
Land Use
Figure 4-7
XX
XX XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
""
""
""
""
YX
YX
YX
YX
YX
YX
YX
!"`$
A¿
A¿
AÙ5/2
0
/
2
0
1
6
J
N
M
:
\
M
d
a
t
a
\
1
4
4
8
3
7
\
G
I
S
\
M
X
D
\
A
c
t
i
v
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
\
C
r
a
s
h
M
a
p
s
f
r
o
m
B
r
i
a
n
\
C
V
A
G
A
T
P
C
o
a
c
h
e
l
l
a
C
r
a
s
h
B
a
s
i
c
A
T
P
.
m
x
d
CVAG ATP City of CoachellaCrash Map
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG, SWITRS Figure 4-8
¯0 21Miles SWITRS database does not provide coordinate data for 4 pedestriancrashes and 4 bicycle crashes, therefore that data is not represented on this map.
YX Pedestrian Fatality
""Bicycle Fatality XX Pedestrian Injury
""Bicycle Injury Proposed Bicycle FacilitiesExisting Bicycle FacilitiesUnion Pacific Railroad
Page 4-34
Bikeways
Existing
Coachella currently has four Class II (bike lane) bikeways, totaling
3.4 miles in length. Table 4-7 lists each bikeway’s location and
length.
Proposed
The City of Coachella has proposed over 50 bikeway projects to be
included in this Plan. The projects are listed in Table 4-8. Project
costs are based on past expenditures for bikeways throughout
California and from feedback received from local jurisdictions.
Costs for individual projects will vary by location and complexity.
Figure 4-9 shows existing and proposed bikeways, bicycle parking,
and amenities.
Table 4-7. City of Coachella Existing Bikeways
ID # Street/Path From To Class Regionally Significant? Length (mi.)
COA01E Calhoun St Ave 48 Ave 49 Bike lanes Yes 0.5
COA02E Frederick St Ave 49 ¼ mile south of Ave
52
Bike lanes No 1.7
COA03E Ave 49 Van Buren St Grapefruit Blvd. Bike lanes Yes 0.7
COA04E Ave 51 Van Buren St Harrison Blvd. Bike lanes No 0.5
COA14 6th St Harrison St Grapefruit Blvd. Sidewalk Path No 0.5
COA38 Calhoun St Ave 49 Coachella Southern
city limit (540 feet
south of Sagrado St)
Bike lanes Yes 0.8
COA38AE Calhoun St 1425' North of Ave
50
Ave 50 Bike lanes (southbound) Yes 0.3
Table 4-8. City of Coachella Proposed Bikeway Projects
ID # Street/Path From To Class
Regionally
Significant?
Length
(mi.)
Estimated
Cost
COA02 Frederick St Ave 52 Ave 54 Bike lanes No 1.0 $79,200
COA06 Dillon Rd Ave 44 Harrison Pl Bike lanes Yes 1.5 $118,800
COA08 Harrison St Hwy 111 Ave 54 Buffered bike lanes/NEV lanes Yes 2.2 $220,704
COA09 Shady Lane Orchard St Ave 52 Bike lanes No 0.5 $39,600
COA10 Ave 52 Coachella Western city limit
(Calhoun St)
Harrison St Bike lanes Yes 1.5 $118,800
COA100 Jackson St Ave 48 Ave 49 Bike lanes Yes 0.5 $39,600
COA11 Ave 52 Tripoli Way Tyler St Bike lanes/NEV lanes Yes 0.6 $50,688
COA12 Ave 52 Tyler St Whitewater River Bike lanes Yes 1.2 $95,040
Table 4-8, continued
Page 4-35
ID # Street/Path From To Class
Regionally
Significant?
Length
(mi.)
Estimated
Cost
COA15 1st St Harrison St Grapefruit Blvd. Bike route Yes 0.3 $11,088
COA16 East side of Shady Ln. 9th St Ave 54 Bike path Yes 1.5 $1,476,288
COA18 Hwy 111 Ave 54 3,520' south of Ave 54
(South City Limit)
Buffered bike lanes Yes 0.7 $70,224
COA19 Industrial Way Enterprise Way Polk St Bike lanes No 0.3 $23,760
COA20 Polk St Industrial Way Ave 54 Bike lanes No 0.8 $63,360
COA22 Enterprise Way Ave 52 Ave 54 Bike lanes No 1.0 $79,200
COA23 Ave 51 Coachella Western city limit
(1330 feet west of Van Buren St.)
Van Buren St Bike lanes No 0.2 $15,840
COA24 Shadow View Blvd. Dillon Rd Tyler St Bike lanes Yes 1.2 $95,040
COA25 Bagdad Ave Douma St Grapefruit Blvd. Bike route Yes 1.1 $40,656
COA26 SR-86S Expressway Dillon Rd Coachella Southern city
limit (Airport Blvd)
Bike route No 5.2 $192,192
COA27 Frederick St Ed Mitchell Dr Ave 49 Bike path No 0.5 $492,096
COA29 Ave 49 Jackson St Van Buren St Bike lanes Yes 1.0 $79,200
COA30 Ave 50 Coachella Western city limit
(1010 feet east of Jackson St)
Whitewater River Bike lanes Yes 2.6 $205,920
COA31 Ave 44 Harrison St Dillon Rd Bike lanes Yes 1.0 $79,200
COA32 Whitewater River Tyler St Airport Blvd Bike path/NEV path Yes 4.0 N/A (CV Link)
COA33 Dillon Rd Whitewater River Ave 48 Bike lanes Yes 1.4 $110,880
COA34 Midblock between
Ave 51 and Ave 52
Van Buren St Frederick St Bike path No 0.5 $492,096
COA35 Connector to
Coachella Canal
Polk St 1930 feet west of
Pierce St
Bike path No 2.4 $2,362,061
COA36 Mitchell Dr Grapefruit Blvd. Van Buren St Bike lanes No 0.6 $47,520
COA37 Ave 54 Van Buren St Whitewater River Bike lanes Yes 3.2 $253,440
COA38A Calhoun St San Mateo Ave South City Limit Bike lanes Yes 0.5 $39,600
COA39 Van Buren St Ave 48 Ave 54 Bike lanes Yes 3.0 $237,600
COA40 Polk St Ave 48 Ave 52 Bike lanes Yes 2.0 $158,400
COA41 Tyler St Dillon Rd Vista del Norte Bike path Yes 0.5 $492,096
COA42 Vista del Norte Tyler St Coachella Canal Bike lanes No 0.6 $47,520
COA43 Tyler St Ave 48 Ave 50 Bike lanes Yes 1.0 $79,200
COA44 Tyler St Ave 50 Ave 52 Bike route Yes 1.0 $36,960
COA45 Ave 48 Tyler St Coachella Canal Bike lanes Yes 1.6 $126,720
COA46 Tyler St Grapefruit Blvd. 54th Ave Bike lanes Yes 1.2 $95,040
COA49 Connector to I-10 Ave 50 I-10 Bike lanes Yes 1.1 $87,120
COA50 Pierce St Coachella Northern city limit
(1320 feet north of Ave 55)
Coachella Southern city
limit (Ave 55)
Bike lanes Yes 0.2 $15,840
COA51 Ave 48 Van Buren St Dillon Rd Multipurpose path/NEV path Yes 0.3 $363,370
COA52 Dillon Rd Ave 48 Whitewater River Sidewalk path/NEV path Yes 1.0 $1,030,656
COA68 Ave 48 Jackson St Van Buren St Buffered Bike/NEV lane Yes 1.0 $100,320
Table 4-8, continued
Page 4-36
ID # Street/Path From To Class
Regionally
Significant?
Length
(mi.)
Estimated
Cost
COACC Ave 52* Harrison St Tripoli Way Bike lanes/NEV lanes Yes 0.1 $10,425
DRCC Dillon Rd* Harrison Pl Whitewater River Bike lanes/NEV lanes Yes 0.3 $23,760
H11131 Grapefruit Blvd. Western city limit (Dillon Rd/Ave
48)
Eastern city limit (Ave
54)
Bike lanes Yes 4.4 $348,480
ISDCC3 Access Road Along
East Side of Spotlight
29 Casino*
Just south of I-10 Harrison Pl Bike lanes/NEV lanes Yes 1.1 $87,120
ISDCC4 Harrison Pl Access road along east side of
Spotlight 29 Casino
Dillon Rd Bike lanes/NEV lanes Yes 0.3 $23,760
LECC1 Ave 52 Whitewater River SR-86S Bike lanes Yes 0.2 $15,840
LECC2 Ave 52* SR-86S Eastern end road Bike lanes/NEV lanes Yes 0.2 $15,000
LECC3 Unpaved Road* Ave 52 Future extension to La
Entrada
Bike lanes/NEV lanes Yes 4.7 $375,000
IN52 Ave 44 Monroe St Harrison St Buffered bike lanes Yes 4.0 $401,280
IN52A Ave 45 Monroe St Harrison St Bike lanes Yes 3.2 $256,370
RIV09 Whitewater River Eastern Indio city limits (1340
feet east of Van Buren St)
Tyler St Bike path/NEV path Yes 3.6 N/A (CV Link)
RIV203 Airport Blvd Orange St Buchanan St Bike lanes No 2.5 $198,000
RIV74 Pierce St Ave 52 to Ave 60 Ave 66 to Harrison St Bike lanes Yes 11.9 $942,480
RIV75B Pierce St 1000' North of 55 Ave 55 Ave Bike path No 0.2 $186,400
RIV78 Airport Blvd Monroe St Polk St Bike lanes Yes 5.0 $396,000
RIV84 Ave 54 Harrison St Tyler St Bike path Yes 1.3 $1,279,450
RIV85 Tyler St Ave 54 Airport Blvd. Bike path Yes 1.0 $984,192
RIV86 Tyler St Ave 54 Airport Blvd. Bike lanes Yes 1.0 $79,200
RIV92 Van Buren St 54th Ave Airport Blvd. Bike lanes Yes 1.0 $79,200
WSCOA Wayfinding Signage $398,000
BPCOA Bicycle Parking Program $25,000
TOTAL $15,987,891
*Planned regional active transportation project with assumed facility type for costing purposes.
!"`$
A¿
A¿
AÙ
UNIONPACIFICRR
4/1
7
/
2
0
1
7
J
N
M
:
\
M
d
a
t
a
\
1
4
4
8
3
7
\
G
I
S
\
M
X
D
\
A
c
t
i
v
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
\
A
T
P
C
i
t
y
M
a
p
s
\
L
o
c
a
l
M
X
D
s
F
i
n
a
l
\
L
o
c
a
l
M
a
p
s
N
o
I
D
N
e
w
S
y
m
b
o
l
o
g
y
9
_
1
4
_
1
6
\
C
V
A
G
A
T
P
C
o
a
c
h
e
l
l
a
n
o
I
D
U
p
d
a
t
e
.
m
x
d
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG
¯0 21Miles
"#= Proposed Index
"8"7
"2
"6
"9
"10
"11
"12
"13
"14
"16
"17
"18
"19
"20
"3
"1
"4
Bike path
Bike/NEV path
Multipurpose path Multipurpose NEV path
Bike laneBike/NEV lane
Buffered bike laneBuffered bike/NEV lane
Colored bike lane
Colored bike/NEV laneColored buffered bike lane
Colored buffered bike/NEV laneDouble colored buffered bike lane
Bike route
Greenback sharrowsBike path (partial)
Bike lanes (partial)Golf path
"21
"22Golf lane
N/A
Proposed Bicycle Facilities Existing Bicycle Facilities
Bike pathMultipurpose path
Sidewalk path
Bike lane
Buffered bike lane
Bike route
Greenback sharrowsBike path (partial)
(!#= Existing Index
(!1
(!3
(!6
(!8
(!5
(!16
(!17
(!18
Colored buffered bike laneColored buffered bike lane/NEV lane(!12(!13
Bike lanes (partial)
Golf path(!19
(!20
Proposed Transit Bike Parking
Bike Parking
*#Proposed
*#ExistingBike Amenities
*#Proposed
#Existing
*#Bike Locker
##Bike Rack
CVAG ATP City of CoachellaLocal Network
Figure 4-9
CVAG ATP Facilities Identifier
City of Coachella
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG
¯0 21
Miles
See CVAG ATP Chapter 4
Table for Facility ID Reference
Proposed Bicycle Facilities
Existing Bicycle Facilities
!!
City of Coachella
Local Network with ATP IDs
Figure 4-9a
Page 4-39
Bicycle Parking
Existing
The City of Coachella has identified several locations where bicycle
parking facilities exist. They are listed below.
Rancho Las Flores Park
Bagdouma Park
6th Street (at eight locations between Date Street and
Grapefruit Boulevard)
Proposed
The City plans to put bicycle racks at the following locations:
Schools
City parks
Civic Center/Veteran Park Expansion Project
Corporate Yard
Harrison Boulevard (south of Avenue 49 to Avenue 52)
The City presently has no requirements for bicycle parking in new
buildings. However, the City is considering enacting requirements.
Links to Other Transportation Modes
The City is served by SunLine Transit, which has bicycle racks on
every bus in its fleet. The older SunLine bus racks hold two
bicycles, but the new state-of-the-art racks will hold three bicycles
per bus and are very convenient to use for the bicyclist. No transit
stations or park-and-ride facilities currently exist in the city or are
planned in the future.
Bike racks and/or bike lockers are proposed by SunLine Transit at
selected bus stop locations in the city. These locations are
presented in Table 4-9.
Table 4-9. Proposed Bus Stop Locations for Bike Racks and/or
Bike Lockers in Coachella
Line(s) Street
Cross
Street
Stop
# Direction Position*
Facility
Type
91 Harrison
St
Grapefruit
Blvd 304 SB FS Bike rack
91 Harrison
St
Grapefruit
Blvd 305 NB FS Bike rack
90/91 Harrison
St Ave 50 356 SB FS Bike rack
90/111 Orchard
Ave 5th St 361 NB FS Bike rack
90 Orchard
Ave 5th St 452 SB NS Bike rack
90 Van
Buren St Ave 50 453 NB FS Bike rack
90/91 Harrison
St Ave 50 815 NB NS Bike rack
90 7th St Orchard
Ave 968 EB FS Bike rack
90/111 7th St Orchard
Ave 514 WB NS Bike rack
* Position refers to the near side (NS) or far side (FS) of the intersection
Bicycle Amenities
There are currently no bicycle commuter–related showers or
clothing lockers. The City of Coachella has no requirements for
bicycle amenities in new buildings. However, the City is
considering enacting requirements for showers and clothing lockers
in industrial parks.
Bicycle Safety Education and Police Enforcement
Coachella has not had a bicycle safety education program.
However, the Coachella Valley Association of Governments,
partnering with the Riverside County Department of Public Health
and the Palm Springs Unified School District, won a federal Safe
Routes to School grant to provide bicycle and pedestrian safety
Page 4-40
education at public schools in Coachella. The program started in
2008. The grant was used to:
hire a Safe Routes to School Coordinator;
conduct safety education assemblies;
host International Walk to School Days, bike rodeos,
Walking School Buses, and Walking Wednesdays events;
provide printed materials and conduct Safe Routes to
School workshops; and
increase law enforcement during school pickup and drop-
off times.
The City will continue to apply for funds to operate these
programs.
Wayfinding Signage
The City will seek funds for a citywide bikeway wayfinding signage
program. The wayfinding signage will connect with CV Link and
with downtown.
Past Funding for Bicycle Facilities
The City of Coachella received approximately $2,000,000 in
funding from the Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ)
Improvement Program for traffic signal, bike lane, and electric
vehicle station improvements.
The Riverside County Department of Public Health won a
$496,100 federal Safe Routes to School grant in 2011 to provide
bicycle and pedestrian safety education at public schools in the
Coachella Valley.
Maintenance Policies
The City of Coachella restripes all major arterial and local streets
annually.
Other Related Policies
The City of Coachella has an existing Safe Routes to School (SRTS)
Plan and an updated General Plan Circulation Element that aligns
with Complete Streets principles. The City currently has no
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Transition Plan.
Coordination with Neighboring Jurisdictions
Since this Plan covers the entire Coachella and Palo Verde Valleys,
the plans of neighboring cities and the unincorporated county were
coordinated to ensure links.
Future Financial Needs
The City of Coachella has the following future financial needs:
Total proposed bikeways 99.6 miles
Total proposed bikeways cost $15,564,891
Bicycle parking program $25,000
Wayfinding signage $398,000
Total capital financial need $15,987,891
Annual bike path maintenance budget
7.9 miles, $79,000/year
Annual Safe Routes to School program
budget $50,000/year
Grant Reporting Policies
The City of Coachella follows specific reporting guidelines for each
grant it receives.
CITY OF D ESERT HOT S PRINGS
This page intentionally left blank
Page 4-41
CITY OF DESERT HOT SPRINGS
BICYCLE PLAN
With a year 2015 population of 28,134 per the California
Department of Finance, Desert Hot Springs is located in the
northwestern corner of the Coachella Valley. The city has a small
network of arterial streets that connect to the surrounding
unincorporated areas. The city’s main arterial is Palm Drive, which
serves as the primarily link to Interstate 10 and Palm Springs to the
south. Other arterials include Pierson Boulevard, Hacienda
Avenue, West Drive, Mission Lakes Boulevard, and Two Bunch
Palms Trail. Most of the city’s destinations are located along Palm
Drive and Pierson Boulevard.
Land Use
Figure 4-10 shows the current and future land use patterns in
Desert Hot Springs. The city consists primarily of low-density
residential and resort spa hotel uses. Commercial office and retail
uses are located along Palm Drive and Pierson Boulevard. Some
industrial uses are located in the south central part of the city. New
residential development has sprung up and more is planned in the
western and northern parts of Desert Hot Springs.
A¡
!"`$
!"`$
2/
1
8
/
2
0
1
6
J
N
M
:
\
M
d
a
t
a
\
1
4
4
8
3
7
\
G
I
S
\
M
X
D
\
A
c
t
i
v
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
\
L
a
n
d
U
s
e
\
C
V
A
G
D
e
s
e
r
t
H
o
t
S
p
r
i
n
g
s
L
a
n
d
U
s
e
.
m
x
d
CVAG ATP - Land UseCity of Desert Hot Springs
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG
City Limits
Desert Hot Springs
Land Use
Single Family Residential
Multi-Family Residential
Mobile Homes and Trailer Parks
Commercial and Services
Facilities
Education
Industrial
Transportation, Communications, and Utilities
Open Space and Recreation
Water
Union Pacific Railroad
¯0 21
Miles
CVAG ATP City of Desert Hot Springs
Land Use
Figure 4-10
A¡
!"`$
!"`$
5/2
0
/
2
0
1
6
J
N
M
:
\
M
d
a
t
a
\
1
4
4
8
3
7
\
G
I
S
\
M
X
D
\
A
c
t
i
v
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
\
C
r
a
s
h
M
a
p
s
f
r
o
m
B
r
i
a
n
\
C
V
A
G
A
T
P
D
e
s
e
r
t
H
o
t
S
p
r
i
n
g
s
C
r
a
s
h
B
a
s
i
c
A
T
P
.
m
x
d
CVAG ATP City of Desert Hot SpringsCrash Map
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG, SWITRS Figure 4-11
¯0 21Miles
SWITRS database does not provide coordinate data for 5 pedestriancrashes and 1 bicycle crash, therefore that data is not represented on this map
YX Pedestrian Fatality
""Bicycle Fatality XX Pedestrian Injury
""Bicycle Injury Proposed Bicycle FacilitiesExisting Bicycle FacilitiesUnion Pacific Railroad
Page 4-44
Bikeways
Existing
Desert Hot Springs currently has seven bikeway facilities—four
Class II (bike lane) and three Class II (bike route) bikeways—
totaling 14.8 miles in length. Table 4-10 lists each facility’s location
and length.
Proposed
The City has proposed 34 bikeway projects to be included in this
Plan. The projects are listed in Table 4-11. Project costs are based
on past expenditures for bikeways throughout California and from
feedback received from local jurisdictions. Costs for individual
projects will vary by location and complexity.
Figure 4-12 shows existing and proposed bikeways, bicycle parking,
and amenities.
Table 4-10. City of Desert Hot Springs Existing Bikeways
ID # Street/Path From To Class
Regionally
Significant?
Length
(mi.)
DHS01E Pierson Blvd Indian Ave / N. Indian Canyon Dr Cholla Dr Bike lanes Yes 1.8
DHS02E Palm Dr 250 feet north of Park Ln Desert Hot Springs Southern city limit (Camino
Aventura)
Bike lanes Yes 4.4
DHS03E Little Morongo Rd Pierson Blvd. 1860 feet south of 20th Ave Bike route Yes 1.8
DHS04E Palm Dr Mission Lakes Blvd. Camino Aventura Bike route Yes 2.2
DHS05E Mission Lakes Blvd Little Morongo Rd Palm Dr Bike route Yes 1.5
DHS08E West Dr Mission Lakes Blvd Ironwood Dr Bike lanes Yes 1.0
PG03E Palm Dr Desert Hot Springs City Limit (Camino
Aventura)
I-10 Bike lanes Yes 2.1
Page 4-45
Table 4-11. City of Desert Hot Springs Proposed Bikeway Projects
ID # Street/Path From To Class
Regionally
Significant?
Length
(mi.)
Estimated
Cost
DHS06A Pierson Blvd., Miracle
Hill Rd
Sierra Blvd. to Indian Canyon Rd Cholla Dr to Palm Dr Greenback Sharrows
(Buffered bike lanes with
road diet)
Yes 5.0 $343,200
DHS07 Indian Canyon Dr Desert Hot Springs Northern city
limit (5990 feet north of Mission
Lakes Blvd)
Pierson Blvd. Bike lanes Yes 2.2 $174,240
DHS08 West Dr Desert Hot Springs northern city
limit (650 feet north of Avenida
Jalisco)
15th Ave Bike lanes Yes 3.5 $277,200
DHS09 Worsley Rd Desert Hot Springs Northern city
limit (5110 feet north of Mission
Creek Rd)
Desert Hot Springs
Southern city limit (Pierson
Blvd)
Bike lanes Yes 2.2 $174,240
DHS10 Mountain View Rd Desert View Ave Camino Campanero Bike route Yes 1.3 $48,048
DHS100 Ave 20 N Indian Canyon Dr Palm Dr Bike lanes Yes 4.1 $324,720
DHS11 Palm Dr Cahuilla Ave Camino Aventura Colored bike lanes Yes 1.8 $237,600
DHS12 Palm Dr Mission Lakes Blvd Cahuilla Ave Greenback sharrows Yes 1.2 $82,368
DHS13 8th St West Dr Blind Canyon Bike lanes No 0.2 $15,840
DHS14 Hacienda Ave Cholla Dr West Dr Buffered bike lanes Yes 0.3 $30,096
DHS15 Hacienda Ave Agua Cayendo Rd Long Canyon Rd Bike lanes Yes 1.5 $118,800
DHS16 2 Bunch Palms Trail West Dr Miracle Hill Rd Buffered bike lanes Yes 1.6 $160,512
DHS17 2 Bunch Palms Trail Little Morongo Rd West Dr Bike lanes Yes 1.0 $79,200
DHS18 Blind Canyon 40 feet north of 13th Ave and
595 feet east of Calle De Familia
New schools north of
Mission Lakes Blvd.
Bike path No 0.9 $885,773
DHS19 Flood control channel Blind Canyon Verbena Dr Bike path No 0.7 $688,934
DHS20 North side of
Hacienda Ave
Long Canyon Julius Corsini Elementary
School
Bike path Yes 0.3 $295,258
DHS21 Atlantic Ave 5th St Pierson Blvd. Bike lanes No 0.3 $23,760
DHS22 Ocotillo Rd 2 Bunch Palms Trail Ironwood Dr Bike lanes No 0.3 $23,760
DHS23 Ocotillo Rd Hacienda Dr Ironwood Dr Bike route No 0.3 $11,088
DHS24 Mesquite Ave Hacienda Dr Ocotillo Rd Bike route No 0.4 $14,784
DHS25 Cactus Dr Palm Dr 2 Bunch Palms Trail Bike lanes No 2.1 $166,320
DHS26 Verbena Dr, Ambrosia
Dr, San Ardo Rd
2 Bunch Palms Trail 8th St Bike route No 2.0 $73,920
DHS27 8th St West Dr Verbena Dr Bike route No 1.0 $36,960
DHS28 Mission Springs Park Park Lane through the park Camino Campanero 50 feet
west of Avenida Descanso
Bike path No 0.3 $295,258
DHS29 Little Morongo Rd Augusta Ave Pierson Blvd. Bike route Yes 1.7 $62,832
DHS30 Mission Creek/Molly
Rd
Mission Lakes Blvd. Pierson Blvd. Bike path No 1.2 $1,181,030
DHS31 Mission Lakes Blvd Indian Ave Verbena Dr Buffered bike lanes Yes 4.1 $411,312
Table 4-11, continued
Page 4-46
ID # Street/Path From To Class
Regionally
Significant?
Length
(mi.)
Estimated
Cost
DHS32 SR-62 (Twentynine
Palms Hwy)
Desert Hot Springs northern city
limit (Casa Grande)
Desert Hot Springs
southern city limit (West
Dr)
Bike route No 2.1 $77,616
DHS33 Santa Cruz Rd Desert Hot Springs northern city
limit (Casa Grande)
West Dr Bike route No 1.1 $40,656
DHS34 Desert View Ave West Dr Mountain View Rd Bike route No 2.0 $73,920
DHS35 Desert View Ave Miracle Hill Rd Mountain View Rd Bike path No 0.5 $492,096
DHS36 Mountain View Rd Desert View Ave Hacienda Ave Bike path Yes 0.2 $196,838
DHS37 Mission Creek Trailhead at Twenty Nine Palms
Hwy
Pierson Blvd. Multipurpose path/NEV path Yes 3.3 $3,997,066
PIER01 Pierson Blvd SR-62 N. Indian Canyon Dr Greenback sharrows
(Buffered bike lanes with
road diet)
Yes 2.6 $178,464
PIER03 Pierson Blvd Cholla Dr Palm Dr Greenback sharrows
(Buffered bike lanes with
road diet)
Yes 0.8 $54,912
RIV03 Ave 20 Palm Dr Mountain View Rd Bike lanes Yes 4.1 $324,720
RIV138 Dillon Rd Mission Creek Palm Dr Multipurpose path/NEV path Yes 1.3 $1,574,602
RIV21 Mission Creek Pierson Blvd. Dillon Rd Multipurpose path/NEV path Yes 2.7 $5,935,037
RIV24 Blind Canyon Mission Creek Intersection of 8th St and
Cholla Dr
Bike path No 0.7 $688,934
RIV70 Little Morongo Rd Dillon Rd Ave 20 Bike lanes Yes 1.7 $134,640
RIV05 Indian Ave/ N. Indian
Canyon Dr
Pierson Blvd. I-10 Fwy. Bike lanes Yes 3.9 $308,880
RIV08 Dillon Rd Eastern Palm Springs city limit
(2660 feet east of Karen Ave)
Northern Indio city limit
(7450 feet south of Old
Aqueduct Rd)
Bike lanes Yes 26.8 $2,122,560
PG03 Palm Dr Dillon Rd I-10 Fwy. Multipurpose path/NEV path Yes 3.8 $4,602,682
WSDHS Wayfinding Signage $396,000
BPDHS Bicycle Parking Program $25,000
TOTAL $27,461,675
A¡
!"`$
!"`$
UNION PACIFIC RR
4/1
7
/
2
0
1
7
J
N
M
:
\
M
d
a
t
a
\
1
4
4
8
3
7
\
G
I
S
\
M
X
D
\
A
c
t
i
v
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
\
A
T
P
C
i
t
y
M
a
p
s
\
L
o
c
a
l
M
X
D
s
F
i
n
a
l
\
L
o
c
a
l
M
a
p
s
N
o
I
D
N
e
w
S
y
m
b
o
l
o
g
y
9
_
1
4
_
1
6
\
C
V
A
G
A
T
P
D
e
s
e
r
t
H
o
t
S
p
r
i
n
g
s
n
o
I
D
U
p
d
a
t
e
.
m
x
d
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG
¯0 21Miles
CVAG ATP City of Desert Hot SpringsLocal Network
Figure 4-12
"#= Proposed Index
"8"7
"2
"6
"9
"10
"11
"12
"13
"14
"16
"17
"18
"19
"20
"3
"1
"4
Bike pathBike/NEV path
Multipurpose path Multipurpose NEV path
Bike laneBike/NEV lane
Buffered bike lane
Buffered bike/NEV laneColored bike lane
Colored bike/NEV laneColored buffered bike lane
Colored buffered bike/NEV lane
Double colored buffered bike laneBike route
Greenback sharrowsBike path (partial)
Bike lanes (partial)Golf path
"21
"22Golf lane
N/A
Proposed Bicycle Facilities Existing Bicycle Facilities
Bike pathMultipurpose path
Sidewalk path
Bike lane
Buffered bike lane
Bike route
Greenback sharrows
Bike path (partial)
(!#= Existing Index
(!1
(!3
(!6
(!8
(!5
(!16
(!17
(!18
Colored buffered bike laneColored buffered bike lane/NEV lane(!12
(!13
Bike lanes (partial)
Golf path(!19
(!20
Proposed Transit Bike Parking
Bike Parking
*#Proposed
*#ExistingBike Amenities
*#Proposed
#Existing
*#Bike Locker
##Bike Rack
CVAG ATP Facilities Identifier
City of Desert Hot Springs
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG
¯0 21
Miles
See CVAG ATP Chapter 4
Table for Facility ID Reference
Proposed Bicycle Facilities
Existing Bicycle Facilities
!!
Figure 4-12a
City of Desert Hot Springs
Local Network with ATP IDs
Page 4-49
Bicycle Parking
Existing
The City of Desert Hot Springs has not identified any existing
bicycle parking facilities within the city.
Proposed
The City will initiate a bicycle parking program to put bike racks at:
All schools
Wardman Park
Mission Springs Park
Tedesco Park
City Hall
Downtown
The City currently has no requirements for bicycle parking in new
buildings.
Links to Other Transportation Modes
The City is served by SunLine Transit, which has bicycle racks on
every bus in its fleet. The older SunLine bus racks hold two
bicycles, but the new state-of-the-art racks will hold three bicycles
per bus and are very convenient to use for the bicyclist. No transit
stations or park-and-ride facilities currently exist in the city.
Bike racks and/or bike lockers are proposed by SunLine Transit at
selected bus stop locations in the city. These locations are
presented in the Table 4-12.
Table 4-12. Proposed Bus Stop Locations for Bike Racks and/or
Bike Lockers in Desert Hot Springs
Line(s) Street Cross Street Stop # Direction Position*
Facility
Type
14 Palm Dr Two Bunch
Palms Dr 1 NB NS Bike
rack
14 Palm Dr Hacienda
Ave 2 NB NS Bike
rack
14/15 Palm Dr Hacienda
Ave 5 SB FS Bike
rack
14/15 Palm Dr Buena Vista
Ave 483 SB NS Bike
rack
14 Palm Dr Buena Vista
Ave 621 NB NS Bike
rack
14 Palm Dr Pierson Blvd 763 SB NS Bike
rack
14 Palm Dr Two Bunch
Palms Dr 765 SB FS Bike
rack
14 Palm Dr 1st St 822 NB FS Bike
rack
15 Hacienda
Ave
Don English
Way 859 WB FS Bike
rack
*Position refers to the near side (NS) or far side (FS) of the intersection
Bicycle Amenities
There are currently no bicycle commuter–related amenities such as
showers or clothing lockers. The City will consider adding
requirements for bicycle amenities in new commercial buildings.
Bicycle Safety Education and Police Enforcement
The City of Desert Hot Springs won a $500,000 (Cycle 3) federal
Safe Routes to School grant to provide bicycle and pedestrian
safety education at public schools in Desert Hot Springs. The grant
was used to:
hire a Safe Routes to School coordinator;
conduct safety education assemblies;
Page 4-50
host International Walk to School Days, bike rodeos,
Walking School Buses, and Walking Wednesdays events;
provide printed materials and conduct Safe Routes to
School workshops; and
increase law enforcement during school pickup and drop-
off times.
The program also requests donations from local establishments to
provide prizes for students who walk to school. The program
started in federal Fiscal Year 2010–2011. The City will continue to
apply for funds to operate these programs.
The Desert Hot Springs Police Department enforces all traffic laws
for bicycle and motor vehicles as part of their regular duties.
Officers ticket violators as they see them. This includes bicyclists
who break traffic laws, as well as motorists who disobey traffic laws
and make the cycling environment more dangerous. The level of
enforcement depends on the availability of officers. The Police
Department also responds to particular needs and problems as they
arise.
Wayfinding Signage
The City will seek funds for a citywide bikeway wayfinding signage
program. The wayfinding signage will connect with CV Link and
with downtown.
Past Expenditures for Bicycle Facilities
Table 4-13 reflects the past expenditures for bicycle projects. The
City used its own funds to add bike lanes to Palm Drive from
Camino Aventura to Camino Idilio.
Table 4-13. Past Expenditures for Bicycle Projects in Desert Hot Springs
Project Name Description Funding Source Total Cost Status
8th Street Widening New sidewalks and bike lanes, matched with City funds SB 821 $69,000 Complete
Pierson Boulevard Bike Lanes Bike lanes SB 821 $195,000 Complete
Hacienda Ave Rehabilitation
Project # 2008-08 New bike lane along Hacienda Ave – Palm to West Federal STP -
STPL 5384-004 $278,061.75 Complete
Safe Routes to School – Cycle 8 Pedestrian ADA and safety improvements – various locations State SR2S $461,025.55 Complete
Safe Routes to School – Cycle 9 New sidewalk and pedestrian ADA and safety improvements – 4th St – Cholla to West State SR2S $245,579.00 Complete
Safe Routes to School – Cycle 2 Pedestrian ADA and safety improvements – various locations, new bike lanes along
West from Palm to 8th St , and Two Bunch Palms from West to Miracle Hill Rd Federal SRTS $491,166.77 Complete
Safe Routes to School – Cycle 3 New sidewalk and pedestrian ADA and safety improvements – 4th St – West to Cactus,
and Cactus from 4th St to 8th St Federal SRTS $500,000 Ongoing
Citywide Restriping and Signage Citywide restriping and new bike lanes and signage – various locations Measure A $170,000 Complete
Page 4-51
Maintenance Policies
The City of Desert Hot Springs follows the Pavement Management
Plan, with maintenance done on an as-needed basis. The City
restripes roadways every three years and resurfaces roadways based
on the Pavement Management Plan. Sign replacement is done by
visual inspection every two years, with signs replaced as needed.
Other Related Policies
The City of Desert Hot Spring has a Safe Routes to School (SRTS)
Plan, but does not have an Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
Transition Plan. The City anticipates that its Citywide Bicycle and
Pedestrian Plan will be completed in 2016 and is in the process of
updating its Circulation Element alongside the General Plan update
with a Complete Streets approach.
Coordination with Neighboring Jurisdictions
Since this Plan covers the entire Coachella and Palo Verde Valleys,
the plans of neighboring cities and the unincorporated county were
coordinated to ensure links.
Future Financial Needs
The City of Desert Hot Springs has the following future financial
needs:
Total proposed bikeways 99.1 miles
Total proposed bikeways cost $27,040,675
Bicycle parking program $25,000
Wayfinding signage $396,000
Total capital financial need $27,461,675
Annual Class I bike path maintenance
4.8 miles, $48,000/year
Safe Routes to School Program $50,000/year
Grant Reporting Policies
The City of Desert Hot Springs follows specific reporting
guidelines for each grant it receives.
Page 4-52
This page intentionally left blank
CITY OF I NDIAN WELLS
This page intentionally left blank
Page 4-53
CITY OF INDIAN WELLS BICYCLE PLAN
With a year 2015 population of 5,194 per the California
Department of Finance, Indian Wells is a city primarily of
residential, resort, and golf course communities. The city has a
small network of arterial streets that connect to its two neighboring
cities, Palm Desert and La Quinta. The city’s main arterial is State
Route 111, which is the primary east–west arterial through the city.
Other arterials include Fred Waring Drive, Cook Street, and
Eldorado Drive. Most of Indian Wells’ destinations are located
along SR 111.
Land Use
Figure 4-13 shows the current and future land use patterns in
Indian Wells. The city consists primarily of low-density residential,
golf course communities, and resort uses with some existing
commercial office and retail uses located along SR 111 and at the
Tennis Stadium near Miles Avenue and Washington Street. The
city has no industrial uses. Future commercial development is
planned near State Route 111 and Miles Avenue. The southern
mountains are zoned as undeveloped land.
A±
AÙ
2/
1
6
/
2
0
1
6
J
N
M
:
\
M
d
a
t
a
\
1
4
4
8
3
7
\
G
I
S
\
M
X
D
\
A
c
t
i
v
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
\
L
a
n
d
U
s
e
\
C
V
A
G
I
n
d
i
a
n
W
e
l
l
s
L
a
n
d
U
s
e
.
m
x
d
CVAG ATP - Land UseCity of Indian Wells
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG
CITYNAME
Indian Wells
Land Use
Single Family Residential
Multi-Family Residential
Mixed Residential
General Office
Commercial and Services
Facilities
Open Space and Recreation
Water¯0 21
Miles
CVAG ATP City of Indian Wells
Land Use
Figure 4-13
A±
AÙ
5/2
0
/
2
0
1
6
J
N
M
:
\
M
d
a
t
a
\
1
4
4
8
3
7
\
G
I
S
\
M
X
D
\
A
c
t
i
v
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
\
C
r
a
s
h
M
a
p
s
f
r
o
m
B
r
i
a
n
\
C
V
A
G
A
T
P
I
n
d
i
a
n
W
e
l
l
s
C
r
a
s
h
B
a
s
i
c
A
T
P
.
m
x
d
CVAG ATP City of Indian WellsCrash Map
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG, SWITRS Figure 4-14
¯0 21Miles
SWITRS database does not provide coordinate data for 1 bicycle crash,therefore that data is not represented on this map.
YX Pedestrian Fatality
""Bicycle Fatality XX Pedestrian Injury
""Bicycle Injury Proposed Bicycle FacilitiesExisting Bicycle Facilities
Page 4-56
Bikeways
Existing
Indian Wells currently has several existing bikeways. They include
Class II (bike lane) and Class II (bike route) facilities, totaling 16.5
miles in length. Existing bikeway facilities are listed in Table 4-14.
Proposed
The proposed bikeway projects in Indian Wells are included in this
Plan and are listed in Table 4-15. Project costs are based on past
expenditures for bikeways throughout California and from
feedback received from local jurisdictions. Costs for individual
projects will vary by location and complexity.
Figure 4-15 shows existing and proposed bikeways, bicycle parking,
and amenities.
Table 4-14. City of Indian Wells Existing Bikeways
ID # Street/Path From To Class
Regionally
Significant?
Length
(mi.)
IW01E Cook St Fred Waring Dr Hwy 111 Bike lanes Yes 0.6
IW02E Cook St Hwy 111 Fairway Dr Bike lanes Yes 0.5
IW03E Eldorado Dr Fred Waring Dr Hwy 111 Bike lanes No 0.5
IW04E Eldorado Dr Hwy 111 640 feet north of Fairway Dr Bike lanes No 0.4
IW05E Eldorado Dr North of Fairway Dr Fairway Dr Bike route No 0.1
IW06E Miles Ave Warner Trail Washington St Bike lanes Yes 0.9
IW07E Fairway Dr Cook St Eldorado Dr Bike route No 1.0
IW08E Rancho Palmeras Dr Hwy 111 Fairway Dr Bike route No 0.5
IW09E Miles Ave Hwy 111 Warner Trail Bike route Yes 0.4
IW10E Portola Ave Grapevine St Haystack Rd Bike lanes Yes 0.5
IW11E Hwy 111 Indian Wells Eastern city limit (Brad
Ryland Dr)
Indian Wells Western city limit (540
feet west of Village Center Dr)
Bike route Yes 3.5
IW12E Hovley Ln. Indian Wells Western city limit (140
feet west of Hemingway Ct)
Via Orvieto Bike lanes/Sidewalk path Yes 0.9
IW14E Hwy 111 Indian Wells Western city limit (540
feet west of Village Center Dr)
Cook St Sidewalk path Yes 0.2
PD13E Hovley Ln East Cook St Washington St Bike Lanes Yes 3.1
PD23E Portola Ave Shadow Mountain Dr Mesa View Dr Bike Lanes Yes 2.1
Page 4-57
Table 4-15. City of Indian Wells Proposed Bikeway Projects
ID # Street/Path From To Class
Regionally
Significant?
Length
(mi.)
Estimated
Cost
FPCC Freedom Park Community Connector
(optional connector for Indian Wells)*
Whitewater River Unspecified Bike lanes/NEV lanes Yes 0.9 $75,000
IW16 Left bank Whitewater River Fred Waring Dr Washington St Bike path/NEV path Yes 3.6 N/A (CV Link)
IW17 Cook St Hwy 111 Fairway Dr Bike lanes/NEV lanes Yes 0.5 $39,600
IW18 Eldorado Dr Hwy 111 640 feet north of
Fairway Dr
Bike lanes/NEV lanes No 0.4 $31,680
IW21 Warner Trail Fred Waring Dr Miles Ave Bike route Yes 0.4 $14,784
TGCC Tennis Garden Community Connector
(optional connector for Indian Wells)*
Tennis Garden Miles Ave Bike path/NEV path Yes 0.2 $402,304
LQ23 Washington St La Quinta Northern City Limit Eisenhower Dr Bike lanes Yes 3.1 $245,520
PD61 Whitewater Channel Magnesia Falls Dr Fred Waring Dr Bike path/NEV path Yes 1.6 N/A (CV Link)
WSIW Wayfinding Signage $43,000
BPIW Bicycle Parking Program $250
TOTAL $852,138
*Planned regional active transportation project with assumed facility type for costing purposes.
A±
AÙ
4/1
7
/
2
0
1
7
J
N
M
:
\
M
d
a
t
a
\
1
4
4
8
3
7
\
G
I
S
\
M
X
D
\
A
c
t
i
v
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
\
A
T
P
C
i
t
y
M
a
p
s
\
L
o
c
a
l
M
X
D
s
F
i
n
a
l
\
L
o
c
a
l
M
a
p
s
N
o
I
D
N
e
w
S
y
m
b
o
l
o
g
y
9
_
1
4
_
1
6
\
C
V
A
G
A
T
P
I
n
d
i
a
n
W
e
l
l
s
n
o
I
D
U
p
d
a
t
e
.
m
x
d
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG
¯0 21Miles
Potential CV Link
CVAG ATP City of Indian WellsLocal Network
Figure 4-15
"#= Proposed Index
"8"7
"2
"6
"9
"10
"11
"12
"13
"14
"16
"17
"18
"19
"20
"3
"1
"4
Bike pathBike/NEV path
Multipurpose path Multipurpose NEV path
Bike laneBike/NEV lane
Buffered bike lane
Buffered bike/NEV laneColored bike lane
Colored bike/NEV laneColored buffered bike lane
Colored buffered bike/NEV lane
Double colored buffered bike laneBike route
Greenback sharrowsBike path (partial)
Bike lanes (partial)Golf path
"21
"22Golf lane
N/A
Proposed Bicycle Facilities Existing Bicycle Facilities
Bike pathMultipurpose path
Sidewalk path
Bike lane
Buffered bike lane
Bike route
Greenback sharrows
Bike path (partial)
(!#= Existing Index
(!1
(!3
(!6
(!8
(!5
(!16
(!17
(!18
Colored buffered bike laneColored buffered bike lane/NEV lane(!12
(!13
Bike lanes (partial)
Golf path(!19
(!20
Proposed Transit Bike Parking
Bike Parking
*#Proposed
*#ExistingBike Amenities
*#Proposed
#Existing
*#Bike Locker
##Bike Rack
CVAG ATP Facilities Identifier
City of Indian Wells
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG
¯0 21
Miles
Potential
CV Link
See CVAG ATP Chapter 4
Table for Facility ID Reference
Proposed Bicycle Facilities
Existing Bicycle Facilities
!!
City of Indian Wells
Local Network with ATP IDs
Figure 4-15a
Page 4-60
Bicycle Parking
Existing
The City of Indian Wells has not identified any existing bicycle
parking facilities.
Proposed
The City may put bike racks at City Hall.
The City of Indian Wells has no requirements for bicycle parking in
new buildings, but will consider requirements in new commercial
development.
Links to Other Transportation Modes
The City is served by SunLine Transit, which has bicycle racks on
every bus in its fleet. The older SunLine bus racks hold two
bicycles, but the new state-of-the-art racks will hold three bicycles
per bus and are very convenient to use for the bicyclist. No transit
stations or park-and-ride facilities currently exist in the city.
Bike racks and/or bike lockers are proposed by SunLine Transit at
selected bus stop locations in the city. These locations are
presented in Table 4-16.
Table 4-16. Proposed Bus Stop Locations for Bike Racks and/or
Bike Lockers in Indian Wells
Line(s) Street Cross Street Stop # Direction Position*
Facility
Type
111/53 SR 111 Village
Center Dr 253 EB FS Bike
rack
111/53 SR 111 Village
Center Dr 254 WB NS Bike
rack
111 SR 111 Indian
Wells Ln 544 EB FS Bike
rack
111 SR 111 Indian
Wells Ln 564 WB FS Bike
rack
* Position refers to the near side (NS) or far side (FS) of the intersection
Bicycle Amenities
The City of Indian Wells has no requirements for bicycle amenities
in new buildings.
Bicycle Safety Education and Police Enforcement
Indian Wells currently has no bicycle safety education program, but
the City will seek funds for such a program.
Wayfinding Signage
The City will seek funds for a citywide bikeway wayfinding signage
program. The wayfinding signage will connect with CV Link and
with downtown.
Past Funding for Bicycle Facilities
All existing bikeways were funded from the City’s General Fund.
The City of Indian Wells has a record of a bikeway project that
took place in the early 1990s when an 8-foot-wide Class I bike path
was constructed on the south side of State Route 111 between
Cook Street and Manitou Drive, a distance of approximately 11,500
linear feet. SB 821 funds in the amount of $121,780 were received
from RCTC for this two-phase project. As the City normally would
provide half of the money, the total project cost was $243,560.
Coordination with Neighboring Jurisdictions
Since this Plan covers the entire Coachella and Palo Verde Valleys,
the plans of neighboring cities and the unincorporated county were
coordinated to ensure links.
Maintenance Policies
The City of Indian Wells sweeps all streets weekly and follows a
pavement management program for resurfacing streets. Sign
replacement is on a three-year cycle, with signs replaced on an as-
needed basis.
Page 4-61
NEVs are not prohibited from using the sidewalks, but the
sidewalks are not signed to allow for their use.
Other Related Policies
The City of Indian Wells General Plan was updated in 2013 with a
Complete Streets approach. The City is currently working on an
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Transition Plan.
Future Financial Needs
The City of Indian Wells has the following future financial needs:
Total proposed bikeways 10.8 miles
Total proposed bikeways cost $808,888
Bicycle parking program $250
Wayfinding signage $43,000
Total capital financial need $852,138
Annual Class I bike path maintenance
0.0 miles, $0/year
Safe Routes to School Program $50,000/year
Grant Reporting Policies
The City of Indian Wells follows specific reporting guidelines for
each grant it receives.
Page 4-62
This page intentionally left blank
CITY OF I NDIO
This page intentionally left blank
Page 4-63
CITY OF INDIO BICYCLE PLAN
With a year 2015 population of 84,201 per the California
Department of Finance, Indio is a residential and industrial city
that has undergone much residential development over the past 20
years. The city has a developed grid network of arterial streets that
connect to its two neighboring cities, La Quinta and Coachella, as
well as to the surrounding unincorporated areas. The main arterial
streets in the network include Jefferson, Monroe, and Jackson
Streets, Avenues 42, 46, 48, and 50, State Route 111, Fred Waring
Drive, Indio Boulevard, and Dillon Road. Most of Indio’s
destinations are located along the arterial street network.
Land Use
Figure 4-16 shows the current and future land use patterns in
Indio. The city consists primarily of medium- and low-density
residential with industrial uses being located along Indio Boulevard
and the Southern Pacific rail corridor. Commercial office and retail
uses are located along the SR 111 corridor, along Indio Boulevard,
and on Jackson Street north of Interstate 10. Future commercial
development is planned north of I-10, and residential development
is planned in most other undeveloped areas that are not along the
Indio Boulevard industrial corridor. The area in the northern part
of the city that was recently annexed is currently shown as zoned
for very low-density residential and agricultural uses.
!"`$
!"`$
A¿
AÙ
2/
1
6
/
2
0
1
6
J
N
M
:
\
M
d
a
t
a
\
1
4
4
8
3
7
\
G
I
S
\
M
X
D
\
A
c
t
i
v
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
\
L
a
n
d
U
s
e
\
C
V
A
G
I
n
d
i
o
L
a
n
d
U
s
e
.
m
x
d
CVAG ATP - Land UseCity of Indio
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG
City Limits
Indio
Land Use
Single Family Residential
Multi-Family Residential
Mobile Homes and Trailer Parks
General Office
Commercial and Services
Facilities
Industrial
Transportation, Communications, and Utilities
Mixed Commercial and Industrial
Mixed Residential and Commercial
Open Space and Recreation
Agriculture
Specific Plan
Union Pacific Railroad
¯0 21
Miles
AVENUE 48 OA
S
I
S
ST
AVENUE 44
DRCARREON BLVD
VA
N
B
U
R
E
N
ST
AR
A
B
I
A
S
T
REQUA AVECL
I
N
T
O
N
ST
45TH
AVE
GO
L
F
C
E
N
T
E
R
P
K
W
Y
CA
L
H
O
U
N
ST
INDIOBLVDDATE
AVE
CIVIC CENTERDR
FRED
WARINGDR
EM
E
R
A
L
D
A
V
E
GOLF
CENTER
PKWY CABAZONAVE
JA
C
K
S
O
N
S
T
A¿
AÌ
CVAG ATP City of Indio
Land Use
Figure 4-16
!"`$
!"`$
A¿
AÙ
5/2
0
/
2
0
1
6
J
N
M
:
\
M
d
a
t
a
\
1
4
4
8
3
7
\
G
I
S
\
M
X
D
\
A
c
t
i
v
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
\
C
r
a
s
h
M
a
p
s
f
r
o
m
B
r
i
a
n
\
C
V
A
G
A
T
P
I
n
d
i
o
C
r
a
s
h
B
a
s
i
c
A
T
P
.
m
x
d
CVAG ATP City of IndioCrash Map
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG, SWITRS Figure 4-17
¯0 21Miles
XW
XW
XW
XW
XW
XW
XW
XWXW
XW
XW
XW
XW XW
XWXW
XW
XW
XW
XW
XW XW
XW
XW
XW
XWXWXW
XW
XW
XW
XW
XW XW
XW
XW
XW
XW
XW
XW
XW
XW
XWXW
XW
")
")
")
")
")")
")
")
")
")
")")
")
")
")
")
")
")
")
")
")
")
")
")
")
"
XWXW XW
XW
XW
XW
XW
AVENUE 48 OA
S
I
S
ST
AVENUE44
DRCARREON BLVD
VA
N
B
U
R
E
N
ST
AR
A
B
I
A
S
T
REQUA AVECL
I
N
T
O
N
ST
45TH
AVE
GO
L
F
C
E
N
T
E
R
P
K
W
Y
CA
L
H
O
U
N
ST
INDIOBLVDDATE
AVE
CIVIC CENTERDR
FRED
WARINGDR
EM
E
R
A
L
D
A
V
E
GOLF
CENTER
PKWY CABAZONAVE
JA
C
K
S
O
N
S
T
A¿
AÌ
SWITRS database does not provide coordinate data for 3 pedestriancrashes and 4 bicycle crashes, therefore that data is not represented on this map.
YX Pedestrian Fatality
""Bicycle Fatality XX Pedestrian Injury
""Bicycle Injury Proposed Bicycle FacilitiesExisting Bicycle FacilitiesUnion Pacific Railroad
Page 4-66
Bikeways
Existing
Indio currently has several existing bikeways. They total 25.4 miles
in length. Existing bikeways are listed in Table 4-17.
Proposed
The City of Indio has over 50 proposed bikeway projects to be
included in this Plan, including top priority projects and other long-
term projects. Table 4-18 lists the proposed projects. Project costs
are based on past expenditures for bikeways throughout California
and from feedback received from local jurisdictions. Costs for
individual projects will vary by location and complexity.
Figure 4-18 shows existing and proposed bikeways, bicycle parking,
and amenities.
Table 4-17. City of Indio Existing Bikeways
ID # Street/Path From To Class Regionally Significant? Length (mi.)
IN01AE Jefferson St Indio Blvd. Ave 50 Bike lanes Yes 4.0
IN02E Jefferson St (west side) Ave 38 Ave 39 Bike path Yes 0.5
IN03E Madison St Indio Blvd. Fred Waring Dr Bike lanes Yes 0.6
IN04E Madison St Miles Ave Hwy 111 Bike lanes Yes 1.0
IN05E Clinton St Fred Waring Dr Hwy 111 Bike lanes No 1.5
IN06E Monroe St Ave 40 1000' N of Ave 42 Bike lanes Yes 1.0
IN08E Calhoun St Doctor Carreon Blvd. Ave 48 Bike lanes Yes 0.5
IN09E Ave 41 Monroe St Jackson St Bike lanes No 1.0
IN10E Ave 42 Jackson St Golf Center Pkwy. Bike lanes Yes 1.0
IN11E Doctor Carreon Blvd. Bristol St Calhoun St Bike lanes Yes 0.4
IN12E Fred Waring Dr 600' E of Jefferson St Madison St Bike lanes Yes 0.9
IN13E Golf Center Pkwy. Ave 42 Ave 43 Bike lanes Yes 0.5
IN14E Jackson St 1000' N of Ave 41 800' N of Ave 42 Bike lanes Yes 0.5
IN15E Jackson St I-10 Whitewater River CV Link Bike lanes Yes 0.6
IN17E Ave 40 Madison St Monroe St Bike lanes Yes 1.0
IN18E Ave 46 Madison St Aladdin St Bike lanes Yes 0.8
IN19AE Miles Ave Dune Palms Rd Clinton St Bike lanes Yes 2.0
IN20E Gore St Ave 41 1000' N of Ave 42 Bike lanes No 0.3
IN21E Golf Center Pkwy. I-10 Hwy 111 Bike lanes Yes 0.9
IN22E Monroe St Ave 48 Ave 52 Bike lanes Yes 2.0
IN23E Jackson St Hwy 111 Dr Carreon Blvd Bike lanes Yes 0.5
IN87E Madison St Ave 50 Ave 52 Bike lanes Yes 1.0
JK01E Jackson St Whitewater River Ave 44 Bike lanes Yes 0.4
LQ03E Westward Ho Dr Dune Palms Rd Jefferson St Bike lanes Yes 0.5
Page 4-67
Table 4-18. City of Indio Proposed Bikeway Projects
ID # Street/Path From To Class
Regionally
Significant?
Length
(mi.)
Estimated
Cost
CCCC Madison St.* Whitewater River Miles Ave Bike lanes/NEV lanes Yes 1.7 $138,030
CGCPCC2 Golf Center Pkwy.* I-10 Whitewater River Bike lanes/NEV lanes Yes 0.2 $13,464
GCPCC Golf Center Pkwy.* Indio Springs Dr I-10 Bike lanes/NEV lanes
(CV Link)
Yes 0.2 $15,840
IN29 Dillon Rd Northern city limit (7450 feet
south of Old Aqueduct Rd)
Ave 44 Bike Path Yes 0.5 $506,880
IN30 Whitewater River Western Indio city limits (800
feet east of Jefferson St)
Eastern Indio city limits
(1340 feet east of Van
Buren St)
Bike path/NEV path Yes 5.6 N/A (CV Link)
IN31 Miles Ave Clinton St Monroe St Buffered bike lanes Yes 0.5 $50,160
IN32 Miles Ave Dune Palms Clinton St Buffered bike lanes Yes 2.0 $200,640
IN34 Indio Blvd. Jefferson St Dillon Rd Bike lanes Yes 5.1 $403,920
IN37 Jefferson St Ave 38 Varner Rd Bike path Yes 1.4 $1,439,539
IN38 Monroe St Ave 40 I-10 (CV Link) Buffered bike lanes Yes 1.5 $150,480
IN40 Monroe St Whitewater River (CV Link) Fred Waring Dr Buffered bike lanes Yes 0.6 $59,189
IN41 Monroe St Fred Waring Dr Ave 52 Bike lanes Yes 4.0 $312,840
IN42 Jackson St Desert Trace Way Pacific Indio Shopping
Center
Bike lanes Yes 0.7 $51,480
IN43 Jackson St Ave 44 Hwy 111 Bike lanes No 1.0 $79,200
IN44 Jackson St Dr Carreon Blvd Ave 50 Bike lanes Yes 1.5 $121,176
IN46 Jackson St Ave 50 Ave 52 Bike lanes Yes 1.0 $79,200
IN47 Oasis St Indio Blvd. Ave 48 Buffered bike lanes Yes 1.6 $157,502
IN49 Civic Center Dr Oasis St Indio Blvd. Bike route Yes 0.4 $14,784
IN50 Requa Ave Monroe St Indio Blvd. Bike route Yes 1.3 $48,048
IN51 Fred Waring Dr Jefferson St Monroe St Buffered bike lanes Yes 1.0 $100,320
IN52 Ave 44 Monroe St Harrison St Buffered bike lanes Yes 4.0 $401,280
IN52A Ave 45 Monroe St Harrison St Bike lanes Yes 3.2 $256,370
IN53 Gore St Trace St Ave 42 Bike lanes No 0.4 $29,304
IN54A Dune Palms Rd Miles Ave Westward Ho Dr Bike lanes Yes 0.5 $39,600
IN57 Ave 43 Calhoun St Golf Center Pkwy. Bike lanes No 0.3 $23,760
IN58 Doctor Carreon Blvd. Hwy 111 Jackson St Bike lanes Yes 1.5 $118,800
IN59 Clinton St Indio Blvd. Fred Waring Dr Bike lanes No 0.3 $26,136
IN60 Ave 39 Adams St Jefferson St Bike lanes No 1.0 $79,200
IN62 Market St/ Dillon Ave Ave 44 Emerald Ave Bike route No 1.3 $48,048
IN63 Palo Verde Ave Ave 44 Ave 45 Bike route No 0.5 $18,480
IN64 Ave 40/ Fifties Way Varner Rd Monroe St Buffered bike lanes Yes 3.5 $351,120
IN65B Ave 50 Polo Grounds Indio Eastern city limit
(1010 feet east of Jackson
St)
Buffered bike lanes Yes 3.3 $331,056
Table 4-18, continued
Page 4-68
ID # Street/Path From To Class
Regionally
Significant?
Length
(mi.)
Estimated
Cost
IN66 Varner Rd Jefferson St Thousand Palm Canyon
Wash
Bike path Yes 1.6 $1,571,328
IN67 Ave 42 400 Feet East of Madison St Jackson St Buffered bike lanes Yes 1.9 $193,618
IN68 Ave 48 Jefferson St Jackson St Buffered Bike/NEV lane Yes 3.0 $300,960
IN68A Ave 48* Bataan St Dillon Rd Bike lanes/NEV lanes Yes 0.1 $3,960
IN69 Arabia St Hwy 111 Ave 48 Bike route Yes 1.0 $36,960
IN70 Golf Center Pkwy. Ave 42 Ave 44 Bike lanes Yes 1.0 $79,200
IN71 Golf Center Pkwy. Ave 44 Indio Springs Dr Bike lanes/NEV lanes Yes 0.1 $7,920
IN72 Miles Ave Monroe St Oasis St Bike route Yes 0.8 $29,568
IN73 Ave 38 Jefferson St Madison St Bike lanes No 1.0 $79,200
IN74 Adams St Ave 38 Ave 40 Buffered bike lanes No 1.0 $100,320
IN75 Madison St Ave 38 Ave 40 Bike lanes No 1.0 $79,200
IN76 Burr St Indio Blvd. Fred Waring Dr Bike lanes No 0.8 $63,360
IN77 Madison St Miles St Ave 48 Bike lanes Yes 1.6 $122,760
IN79 Kenner Ave Ave 44 (via Saguaro St/
Adobe Rd)
Jackson St Bike route No 1.0 $36,960
IN81 Ave 45/ Van Buren St/
Cabazon Rd
Golf Center Pkwy. Dillon Rd Bike route Yes 1.9 $70,224
IN82 Date Ave Jackson St Indio Blvd. Bike route No 1.7 $62,832
IN83 Calhoun St Hwy 111 Doctor Carreon Blvd. Buffered bike lanes Yes 0.5 $50,160
IN84 Van Buren St Indio Blvd. Ave 48 Bike lanes Yes 0.5 $39,600
IN85 Ave 52 Monroe St Jackson St Bike lanes Yes 1.0 $79,200
ISDCC Indio Springs Dr* Golf Center Pkwy. Access Road along I-10 Bike lanes/NEV lanes Yes 0.8 $63,360
ISDCC2 Access Road Along I-10* Indio Springs Dr Indio East City Limit Bike lanes/NEV lanes Yes 0.9 $73,656
JF01 Jefferson St Indio Blvd Ave 50 Buffered bike lanes Yes 4.0 $401,280
LQ35B Ave 52 Madison St Monroe St Bike lane Yes 1.0 $79,200
LQ42B Madison St Ave 51 Ave 52 Buffered Bike Lanes No 0.5 $50,160
LQ42C Madison St Ave 48 Ave 51/Polo Grounds Buffered bike lanes Yes 1.5 $150,480
LQ55A La Quinta Evac Channel Whitewater River Indio West City Limit Multipurpose path/NEV
path
Yes 0.8 $1,022,208
NICC Jackson St Pacific Indio Shopping Center I-10 Bike lanes Yes 0.1 $7,920
NICC2 Jackson St* I-10 Whitewater River Bike lanes/NEV lanes Yes 0.5 $36,750
SCCC Channel* Whitewater River Extends north (not enough
information in CV
Conceptual Master Plan)
Bike path/NEV path Yes 1.2 $2,023,760
IN55 Westward Ho Dr Dune Palms Rd Jefferson St Bike route Yes 0.5 $18,480
COA06 Dillon Rd Ave 44 Harrison Pl Bike lanes Yes 1.5 $118,800
WSIN Wayfinding Signage $345,000
BPIN Bicycle Parking Program $50,000
TOTAL $13,114,230
*Planned regional active transportation project with assumed facility type for costing purposes.
!"`$
!"`$
A¿
AÙE
AÌ
UNIONPACIFICRR
4/1
7
/
2
0
1
7
J
N
M
:
\
M
d
a
t
a
\
1
4
4
8
3
7
\
G
I
S
\
M
X
D
\
A
c
t
i
v
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
\
A
T
P
C
i
t
y
M
a
p
s
\
L
o
c
a
l
M
X
D
s
F
i
n
a
l
\
L
o
c
a
l
M
a
p
s
N
o
I
D
N
e
w
S
y
m
b
o
l
o
g
y
9
_
1
4
_
1
6
\
C
V
A
G
A
T
P
I
n
d
i
o
n
o
I
D
U
p
d
a
t
e
.
m
x
d
CVAG ATP City of IndioLocal Network
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG Figure 4-18
¯0 21Miles
*#
*#
*#
*#
*#
*#
*#
*#
*#
*#
*#
*#
*#
*#
*#*#
*#
*#
*#
*#
*#
*#
*#
*#*#
*#
*#
*#
*#
*#
*#
AVENUE 48 OA
S
I
S
ST
AVENUE44
DRCARREON BLVD
VA
N
B
U
R
E
N
ST
AR
A
B
I
A
S
T
REQUA AVECL
I
N
T
O
N
ST
45TH
AVE
GO
L
F
C
E
N
T
E
R
P
K
W
Y
CA
L
H
O
U
N
ST
INDIOBLVDDATE
AVE
CIVIC CENTERDR
FRED
WARINGDR
EM
E
R
A
L
D
A
V
E
GOLF
CENTER
PKWY CABAZONAVE
JA
C
K
S
O
N
S
T
""2
""9
""16
""8
""3
""6 ""4
""7""6
""6
""16
""16
""8
""6
""8
""6
""6
""16
""6
""8
""3
""6
""6
""16
""6
""8
""9
""16
""6
""6
!!6
!!6
!!6
!!6
!!6
!!6
!!6
!!6
!!6
!!6
!!6
""8""8
""22
""7
""16
""2
""16
""3
""16
""16
""8!!6
!!6
!!6
!!6
A¿
AÙ
"#= Proposed Index
"8"7
"2
"6
"9
"10
"11
"12
"13
"14
"16
"17
"18
"19
"20
"3
"1
"4
Bike pathBike/NEV path
Multipurpose path Multipurpose NEV path
Bike laneBike/NEV lane
Buffered bike lane
Buffered bike/NEV laneColored bike lane
Colored bike/NEV laneColored buffered bike lane
Colored buffered bike/NEV lane
Double colored buffered bike laneBike route
Greenback sharrowsBike path (partial)
Bike lanes (partial)Golf path
"21
"22Golf laneN/A
Proposed Bicycle Facilities Existing Bicycle Facilities
Bike pathMultipurpose pathSidewalk path
Bike laneBuffered bike lane
Bike route
Greenback sharrows
Bike path (partial)
(!#= Existing Index
(!1
(!3
(!6
(!8
(!5
(!16
(!17
(!18
Colored buffered bike lane
Colored buffered bike lane/NEV lane(!12
(!13
Bike lanes (partial)
Golf path(!19
(!20
Proposed Transit Bike Parking
Bike Parking
*#Proposed
*#ExistingBike Amenities
*#Proposed
#Existing
*#Bike Locker
##Bike Rack
CVAG ATP Facilities Identifier
City of Indio
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG
¯0 21
Miles
IN6
COA51
IN49
IN79
See CVAG ATP Chapter 4
Table for Facility ID Reference
Proposed Bicycle Facilities
Existing Bicycle Facilities
!!
Figure 4-18a
City of Indio
Local Network with ATP IDs
Page 4-71
Bicycle Parking
Existing
The city of Indio has identified locations where bicycle parking
facilities exist. They are listed below.
City Hall
Indio Fashion Mall
Riverside County Administrative Center
City of Indio Teen Center
Miles Avenue between Oasis Street and Towne Street, and
between Towne Street and Smurr Street
Proposed
The City will add bicycle parking at:
All parks
The downtown transportation center
Recreational District facilities
The City Planning Code requires bicycle parking at all new
commercial development. This is also a standard condition of
approval on each development project.
Links to Other Transportation Modes
Indio is served by SunLine Transit, which has bicycle racks on
every bus in its fleet. The older SunLine bus racks hold two
bicycles, but the new state-of-the-art racks will hold three bicycles
per bus and are very convenient to use for the bicyclist. An Amtrak
and Greyhound multimodal transit station is planned on Indio
Boulevard near Jackson Street. No park-and-ride facilities currently
exist in the city or are planned in the future.
Bike racks and/or bike lockers are proposed by SunLine Transit at
selected bus stop locations in the city. These locations are
presented in Table 4-19.
Table 4-19. Proposed Bus Stop Locations for Bike Racks and/or
Bike Lockers in Indio
Line(s) Street
Cross
Street
Stop
# Direction Position*
Facility
Type
111/
80 SR 111
Dr.
Carreon
Blvd
93 EB MB Bike rack
111 SR 111 Monroe
St. 100 WB MB Bike rack
80/54 Monroe
St
Hoover
St 107 NB FS Bike rack
80/54/
81
Monroe
St
Fred
Waring
Dr
321 SB FS Bike rack
81/
111 SR 111 Clinton St 333 WB MB Bike rack
80 Ave 48 Jackson
St 374 WB FS Bike rack
111 SR 111 Monroe
St 550 EB FS Bike rack
81 Ave 44 Jackson
St 790 WB FS Bike rack
54/80/
81/
90/91/
95/
111
SR 111 Flower St 835 EB FS Bike rack
* Position refers to the near side (NS) or far side (FS) of the intersection
Bicycle Amenities
There are currently no bicycle commuter–related showers or
clothing lockers. The City will add amenities at a new park between
Market Street, Avenue 44, and Dillon Avenue.
The City will add showers and clothing lockers downtown.
Page 4-72
The City also has a Transportation Demand Management (TDM)
ordinance that provides credit to developers that preserve 2
percent of the gross floor area for showers and clothing lockers, as
one of 26 TDM options.
Bicycle Safety Education and Police Enforcement
The Riverside County Department of Public Health won a
Riverside County Safe Routes to School plan grant of $500,000 to
provide bicycle and pedestrian safety education at 15 public schools
in Indio. The grant will be used for:
Walk audits and reporting
Bicycle and pedestrian safety
Bike skills and maintenance
The program started in federal Fiscal Year 2015 and will continue
until 2017. The City will continue to apply for funds to operate
these programs.
The Coachella Valley Community Trust funds bicycle safety
education that is delivered by the City Police Department. The
Police Department hands out bicycle safety information at events,
festivals, neighborhood watch meetings, and other community
meetings. If requested by a school or other community
organization, the Police Traffic Team has a bicycle safety
presentation that they give. The Police Department also posts
bicycle safety information on the department website. The Police
Department’s education outreach is expected to continue
indefinitely.
The City will apply for grant funding for Safe Routes to School
programs.
Wayfinding Signage
The City will seek funds for a citywide bikeway wayfinding signage
program. The wayfinding signage will connect with CV Link and
with downtown.
Past Funding for Bicycle Facilities
New bikeways have been incorporated into other street projects,
along with regular maintenance.
The Riverside County Department of Public Health won a
Riverside County Safe Routes to School plan grant of $500,000 to
provide bicycle and pedestrian safety education at public schools in
Indio.
Maintenance Policies
The City of Indio restripes roadways annually and sweeps major
roadways twice a month. The City replaces signs and lighting when
needed.
Street Maintenance spends $24,000 per year citywide on striping
190,000 linear feet of 6-inch white paint and 120 legends. Sign
replacement costs about $800 per month. There is no special
sweeping of bike lanes. Total estimated operations and
maintenance is $33,600 per year for 36 miles of bike and golf cart
lanes.
Other Related Policies
The City of Indio is currently undergoing a General Plan update,
including the Circulation Element. This update will be prepared
with Complete Streets principles.
Coordination with Neighboring Jurisdictions
Since this Plan covers the entire Coachella and Palo Verde Valleys,
the plans of neighboring cities and the unincorporated county were
coordinated to ensure links.
Page 4-73
Future Financial Needs
The City of Indio has the following future financial needs:
Total proposed bikeways 86.2 miles
Total proposed bikeways cost $12,719,230
Bicycle parking program $50,000
Wayfinding signage $345,000
Total capital financial need $13,114,230
Annual Class I bike path maintenance budget
3.5 miles, $35,000/year
Safe Routes to School Program $50,000/year
Grant Reporting Policies
The City of Indio follows specific reporting guidelines for each
grant it receives.
Page 4-74
This page intentionally left blank
CITY OF L A QUINTA
This page intentionally left blank
Page 4-75
CITY OF LA QUINTA BICYCLE PLAN
With a year 2015 population of 39,694 per the California
Department of Finance, La Quinta is a residential and resort city in
the southern portion of the Coachella Valley. The city has a grid
network of arterial streets that connect to its neighboring cities:
Indio, Indian Wells, and Coachella. The main arterial streets in the
network include Fred Waring Drive, Miles Avenue, State Route
111, Avenues 48, 50, and 52, and Washington, Madison, and
Jefferson Streets. Most of La Quinta’s destinations are located
along the arterial street network.
Land Use
Figure 4-19 shows the current and future land use patterns in a
Quinta. The city consists primarily of low- and medium-density
residential, commercial, and golf resort land uses. Most of the retail
and office commercial uses are located along or near SR 111. A
new retail center, called the Village District, has been built near the
Civic Center. Medium-density residential is located in La Quinta
Cove in the west part of the city, and many golf course
communities are located in the central and southern parts of La
Quinta. Undeveloped areas are currently zoned for low-density
residential in the valley areas and agricultural or open space in the
hills.
!"`$
A¿AÙ
A±
AÙ
2/1
6
/
2
0
1
6
J
N
M
:
\
M
d
a
t
a
\
1
4
4
8
3
7
\
G
I
S
\
M
X
D
\
A
c
t
i
v
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
\
L
a
n
d
U
s
e
\
C
V
A
G
L
a
Q
u
i
n
t
a
L
a
n
d
U
s
e
.
m
x
d
CVAG ATP - Land UseCity of La Quinta
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG
City Limits
La Quinta
Land Use
Single Family Residential
Multi-Family Residential
General Office
Commercial and Services
Facilities
Industrial
Mixed Residential and Commercial
Open Space and Recreation
Union Pacific Railroad
¯0 21
Miles
CVAG ATP City of La Quinta
Land Use
Figure 4-19
!"`$
A¿AÙ
A±
AÙ
5/2
0
/
2
0
1
6
J
N
M
:
\
M
d
a
t
a
\
1
4
4
8
3
7
\
G
I
S
\
M
X
D
\
A
c
t
i
v
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
\
C
r
a
s
h
M
a
p
s
f
r
o
m
B
r
i
a
n
\
C
V
A
G
A
T
P
L
a
Q
u
i
n
t
a
C
r
a
s
h
B
a
s
i
c
A
T
P
.
m
x
d
CVAG ATP City of La QuintaCrash Map
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG, SWITRS Figure 4-20
¯0 21Miles
SWITRS database does not provide coordinate data for 2 pedestriancrashes and 1 bicycle crash, therefore that data is not represented on this map.
YX Pedestrian Fatality
""Bicycle Fatality XX Pedestrian Injury
""Bicycle Injury Proposed Bicycle FacilitiesExisting Bicycle FacilitiesUnion Pacific Railroad
Page 4-78
Bikeways
Existing
La Quinta’s existing bikeways total 34 miles in length. Existing
facilities are listed in Table 4-20.
Proposed
Table 4-21 lists the proposed bikeway projects in this Plan for the
City of La Quinta. Project costs are based on past expenditures for
bikeways throughout California and from feedback received from
local jurisdictions. Costs for individual projects will vary by location
and complexity.
Figure 4-21 shows existing and proposed bikeways, bicycle parking,
and amenities.
Table 4-20. City of La Quinta Existing Bikeways
ID # Street/Path From To Class
Regionally
Significant?
Length
(mi.)
AV5201E Ave 52 Eisenhower Dr Monroe St. Bike lanes Yes 2.3
LQ01E Bear Creek Trail Eisenhower Dr Calle Tecate Bike path No 2.7
LQ02E Miles Ave Washington St to Adams St Dune Palms Rd to Jefferson St Bike lanes Yes 1.2
LQ03E Westward Ho Dr Dune Palms Rd Jefferson St Bike lanes Yes 0.5
LQ04E Ave 48 Washington St Jefferson St Bike lanes Yes 1.5
LQ05E Ave 50 1240 feet west of Park Ave Jefferson St Bike lanes Yes 1.0
LQ06E Calle Tampico Eisenhower Dr Washington St Bike lanes Yes 0.8
LQ07E Calle Tampico Washington St Park Ave Bike lanes Yes 0.6
LQ09E Ave 54 Jefferson St Monroe St Bike lanes Yes 2.0
LQ10E Airport Blvd Madison St Monroe St Bike lanes Yes 1.0
LQ11E Ave 58 Madison St Almonte Dr Bike lanes Yes 0.7
LQ12E Ave 60 Madison St La Quinta Eastern city limit (630
feet east of Wyndemere Way)
Bike lanes Yes 1.0
LQ13E Calle Tecate/ Avenida Bermudas Avenida Madero Calle Sinaloa Bike lanes No 2.2
LQ14E Washington St Eisenhower Dr Ave 52 Bike lanes Yes 1.5
LQ15E Eisenhower Dr Avenida Fernando Calle Tampico Bike lanes Yes 0.8
LQ16E Park Ave Ave 50 Calle Tampico Bike lanes No 0.5
LQ17E Adams St Hwy 111 Ave 48 Bike lanes Yes 0.6
LQ18AE Dune Palms Rd Westward Ho Dr Whitewater River Bike lanes Yes 0.3
LQ18BE Dune Palms Rd Hwy 111 Ave 48 Bike lanes Yes 0.5
LQ19E Jefferson St Ave 50 Ave 54 Bike lanes Yes 4.8
LQ20E Madison St Ave 52 Ave 60 Bike lanes Yes 4.1
LQ21E Monroe St Ave 52 Ave 54 Bike lanes Yes 1.0
LQ22E Monroe St Mountain View Ln. Ave 58 Bike lanes Yes 1.6
IN01AE Jefferson St Indio Blvd. Ave 50 Bike lanes Yes 4.0
Page 4-79
Table 4-21. City of La Quinta Proposed Bikeway Projects
ID # Street/Path From To Class
Regionally
Significant?
Length
(mi.)
Estimated
Cost
IN54 Dune Palms Rd Miles Ave Westward Ho Dr Bike lanes/NEV lanes Yes 0.5 $39,600
IN55 Westward Ho Dr Dune Palms Rd Jefferson St Bike route Yes 0.5 $18,480
IN65 Ave 50 Jefferson St Madison St Bike lanes/NEV lanes Yes 1.0 $79,200
IN65A Ave 50 Jefferson St Madison St Multipurpose Path Yes 1.0 $1,292,544
LCCC Ave 58* Madison St Lake Cahuilla Bike lanes/NEV lanes Yes 1.1 $87,120
LQ04 Ave 48 Washington St Jefferson St Bike lanes/NEV lanes Yes 1.5 $118,800
LQ23 Washington St La Quinta Northern City Limit Eisenhower Dr Bike lanes Yes 3.1 $245,520
LQ24A South bank
Whitewater River
West City Limits East City Limits Multipurpose path Yes 1.9 N/A (CV Link)
LQ24B South bank
Whitewater River
West City Limits East City Limits Bike path Yes 1.9 N/A (CV Link)
LQ27 Calle Tampico Eisenhower Dr Washington St Bike lanes/NEV lanes Yes 0.8 $63,360
LQ28 Calle Tampico Washington St Calle Quito Bike lanes Yes 0.1 $7,920
LQ29 Calle Tampico Calle Quito Calle Rondo Bike lanes/NEV lanes Yes 0.2 $15,840
LQ30 Ave 50 Washington St 1240 feet west of Park Ave Bike lanes Yes 0.6 $47,520
LQ32 Eisenhower Dr Calle Tampico Calle Sinaloa Bike route Yes 0.4 $14,784
LQ33 Eisenhower Dr Washington St Avenue 50 Bike route Yes 1.0 $36,960
LQ35 Ave 52 Jefferson St Monroe St Bike lanes/NEV lanes Yes 2.0 $158,400
LQ35A Ave 52 Jefferson St Monroe St Multipurpose path Yes 2.0 $2,585,088
LQ36 Miles Ave Dune Palms Rd Jefferson St Bike lanes/NEV lanes Yes 0.5 $39,600
LQ39 Avenida Bermudas
(Southbound only)
Calle Tampico Calle Sinaloa Bike route No 0.4 $14,784
LQ40 Hwy 111 La Quinta Western city limit
(Brad Ryland Dr)
La Quinta Eastern city limit
(Jefferson St)
Bike lanes Yes 1.7 $134,640
LQ42 Madison St Ave 50 Entrance to Polo Grounds
at south terminus of trail
Multipurpose Path Yes 0.5 $646,272
LQ42A Madison St Ave 50 Entrance to Polo Grounds
at south terminus of trail
Bike lanes/NEV lanes Yes 0.5 $39,600
LQ43 Fred Waring Dr Washington St Adam St Bike lanes Yes 1.0 $79,200
LQ44 Fred Waring Dr
(Southbound Only)
Adam St Dune Palms Rd Buffered bike lanes/NEV
lanes
Yes 0.5 $50,160
LQ45 Fred Waring Dr Dune Palms Rd Jefferson St Bike lanes Yes 0.5 $39,600
LQ46 Ave 50 Eisenhower Dr Washington St Bike route Yes 0.8 $29,568
LQ47 Ave 54 Jefferson St Monroe St Bike lanes/NEV lanes Yes 2.0 $158,400
LQ47A Ave 54 Jefferson St Monroe St Multipurpose path Yes 2.0 $2,585,088
LQ48 Airport Blvd Madison St Monroe St Multipurpose path Yes 1.0 $1,292,544
LQ48A Airport Blvd Madison St Monroe St Bike lanes/NEV lanes Yes 1.0 $79,200
LQ49 Ave 58 Almonte Monroe St Bike lanes/NEV lanes Yes 0.3 $23,760
LQ49A Ave 58 Almonte Monroe St Multipurpose path Yes 0.3 $387,763
Table 4-21, continued
Page 4-80
ID # Street/Path From To Class
Regionally
Significant?
Length
(mi.)
Estimated
Cost
LQ51 Ave 62 Madison St Monroe St Bike lanes/NEV lanes Yes 1.0 $79,200
LQ51A Ave 62 Madison St Monroe St Multipurpose path Yes 1.0 $1,292,544
LQ52 Monroe St Ave 54 Mountain View Ln. Bike lanes/NEV lanes Yes 0.5 $39,600
LQ52A Monroe St Ave 54 Mountain View Ln. Multipurpose path Yes 0.5 $646,272
LQ53 Monroe St Ave 58 Ave 62 Bike lanes/NEV lanes No 2.0 $158,400
LQ53A Monroe St Ave 58 Ave 62 Multipurpose path No 2.0 $2,585,088
LQ54 Park Ave Ave 50 Calle Tampico Bike lanes/NEV lanes No 0.5 $39,600
LQ55 La Quinta Evac
Channel
La Quinta East City Limit Ave 48 Multipurpose path/NEV path Yes 0.4 $556,723
BHCC Blackhawk Way* Adams St Dune Palms Rd Bike lanes/NEV lanes No 0.5 $42,225
MCC Madison St* Ave 52 Ave 58 Bike lanes/NEV lanes Yes 3.0 $237,600
DPRCC Dune Palms Rd* Ave 48 Whitewater River Bike lanes/NEV lanes No 0.2 $18,750
JF01 Jefferson St Indio Blvd Ave 50 Buffered bike lanes Yes 4.0 $401,280
WSLQ Wayfinding Signage $193,000
BPLQ Bicycle Parking Program $25,000
TOTAL $16,726,597
*Planned regional active transportation project with assumed facility type for costing purposes.
!"`$
A¿
AÙ
A±
AÙ
4/1
7
/
2
0
1
7
J
N
M
:
\
M
d
a
t
a
\
1
4
4
8
3
7
\
G
I
S
\
M
X
D
\
A
c
t
i
v
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
\
A
T
P
C
i
t
y
M
a
p
s
\
L
o
c
a
l
M
X
D
s
F
i
n
a
l
\
L
o
c
a
l
M
a
p
s
N
o
I
D
N
e
w
S
y
m
b
o
l
o
g
y
9
_
1
4
_
1
6
\
C
V
A
G
A
T
P
L
a
Q
u
i
n
t
a
n
o
I
D
U
p
d
a
t
e
.
m
x
d
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG
¯0 21Miles
AVENUE 48
MILES AVE
AVENUE 50
EISENHOWER
DR
AD
A
M
S
ST
DU
N
E
PA
L
M
S
RD
WA
S
H
I
N
G
T
O
N
S
T
46TH AVE
""6
!!6
!!5 !!6""6""9 ""8
""22
""4
""7 ""7
""22
""6
""16
""7
""7
""22
""8
""9
""2
""6
""2
""16
""3""1
""6
""8
!!6
!!6
!!5
!!6
!!6
!!6
!!5!!16
!!5
!!6!!6
!!5
!!6
!!6
AVENUE 50
EISENHOWER
DR
AV
E
N
I
D
A
B
E
R
M
U
D
A
S
!!6
!!6!!6
!!6
!!6
!!6
!!6
!!6
!!1 ""6
""6""16
""16
""7 ""7
CVAG ATP City of La QuintaLocal Network
Figure 4-21
"#= Proposed Index
"8"7
"2
"6
"9
"10
"11
"12
"13
"14
"16
"17
"18
"19
"20
"3
"1
"4
Bike path
Bike/NEV path
Multipurpose path Multipurpose NEV path
Bike laneBike/NEV lane
Buffered bike lane
Buffered bike/NEV lane
Colored bike lane
Colored bike/NEV laneColored buffered bike lane
Colored buffered bike/NEV lane
Double colored buffered bike lane
Bike route
Greenback sharrowsBike path (partial)
Bike lanes (partial)
Golf path
"21
"22Golf lane
N/A
Proposed Bicycle Facilities Existing Bicycle Facilities
Bike pathMultipurpose path
Sidewalk path
Bike laneBuffered bike lane
Bike route
Greenback sharrows
Bike path (partial)
(!#= Existing Index
(!1
(!3
(!6
(!8
(!5
(!16
(!17
(!18
Colored buffered bike lane
Colored buffered bike lane/NEV lane(!12
(!13
Bike lanes (partial)
Golf path(!19
(!20
Proposed Transit Bike Parking
Bike Parking
*#Proposed
*#ExistingBike Amenities
*#Proposed
#Existing
*#Bike Locker
##Bike Rack
CVAG ATP Regional Facilities Identifier
City of La Quinta
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG
¯0 21
Miles
46TH A
See CVAG ATP Chapter 5
Table for Facility ID Reference
Proposed Bicycle Facilities
Existing Bicycle Facilities
!!
City of La Quinta
Local Network with ATP IDs
Figure 4-21a
Page 4-83
Bicycle Parking
Existing
The City of La Quinta has identified the following locations of
existing bicycle parking facilities:
Boys and Girls Club of the Coachella Valley
La Quinta Village District
One Eleven La Quinta shopping center
La Quinta Plaza shopping center
Most major shopping centers along State Route 111
La Quinta Resort and Club
Riverside County Fire Department
Library
Sports complex at the end of Park Avenue
La Quinta Park
Fritz Burns Park
La Quinta Museum
All schools
Four rest stops along Bear Creek path
The Wellness Center (formerly La Quinta Senior Center)
Proposed
La Quinta Municipal Code Section 9.50.160 requires bicycle racks
at new nonresidential developments. The requirements vary
according to land use.
Specific locations for proposed bicycle parking include the
following:
City Hall
CV Link
Fred Wolff Bear Creek Nature Preserve (Avenida
Montezuma and Calle Chillon)
Shopping centers along State Route 111
Links to Other Transportation Modes
The City is served by SunLine Transit, which has bicycle racks on
every bus in its fleet. The older SunLine bus racks hold two
bicycles, but the new state-of-the-art racks will hold three bicycles
per bus and are very convenient for bicyclists to use. No transit
stations or park-and-ride facilities currently exist in the city or are
planned in the future.
Bike racks and/or bike lockers proposed by SunLine Transit at
selected bus stop locations in the city are presented in Table 4-22.
Page 4-84
Table 4-22. Proposed Bus Stop Locations for Bike Racks and/or
Bike Lockers in La Quinta
Line(s) Street Cross Street Stop # Direction Position* Facility
Type
70 Adams St SR 111 84 SB FS Bike
locker
70 Avenida
Bermudas
Calle
Tampico 87 NB NS Bike
rack
70 Avenida
Bermudas
Calle
Tampico 88 SB FS Bike
rack
70 Washington
St
Calle
Tampico 298 NB FS Bike
rack
111 SR 111 Washington
St 547 EB FS Bike
rack
111 SR 111 Adams St 561 WB FS Bike
locker
111 SR 111 Adams St 571 EB FS Bike
locker
70 Calle
Tampico
Washington
St 869 WB FS Bike
rack
70 Adams St SR 111 891 NB NS Bike
rack
* Position refers to the near side (NS) or far side (FS) of the intersection
Bicycle Amenities
The following four locations have been identified that provide
showers and clothing lockers for employees and/or patrons:
Boys and Girls Club of the Coachella Valley
La Quinta Resort and Club
Riverside County Fire Department
La Quinta Fitness Center
City Hall
The Wellness Center
Fritz Burns Pool
La Quinta also has a Transportation Demand Management (TDM)
ordinance that requires developers to preserve 2 percent of gross
floor area for showers and clothing lockers.
Bicycle Safety Education and Police Enforcement
The City of La Quinta Police Department holds an annual bicycle
safety fair for youth.
Wayfinding Signage
The City has wayfinding signs for the Village and intends to add
wayfinding signs to direct people to, from, and along the CV Link.
Past Expenditures for Bicycle Facilities
All existing bike lanes have been constructed from development
exactions. Some trails, such as the Bear Creek Trail, have used a
variety of public funds.
Maintenance Policies
The City updates the pavement management plan every five years.
The City applies a pavement management index (PMI) that shows
the results of reflectometer tests assessing reflectivity. The City
prioritizes repaving according to this index and repaves as needed.
All bikeways are repaved and restriped as part of the street. The
City also replaces signs as needed.
Other Related Policies
The City has an Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Transition
Plan and is looking into partnering with the school district to create
a Safe Routes to School (SRTS) Plan.
Coordination with Neighboring Jurisdictions
Since this Plan covers the entire Coachella and Palo Verde Valleys,
the plans of neighboring cities and the unincorporated county were
coordinated to ensure links.
Page 4-85
Future Financial Needs
The City of La Quinta has the following future financial needs:
Total proposed bikeways 48.3 miles
Total proposed bikeways cost $16,508,597
Bicycle parking program $25,000
Wayfinding signage $193,000
Total capital financial need $16,726,597
Annual Class I bike path maintenance budget
1.9 miles, $19,000/year
Safe Routes to School Program $50,000/year
Grant Reporting Policies
The City follows specific reporting guidelines for each grant it
receives.
Page 4-86
This page intentionally left blank
CITY OF PALM DESERT
This page intentionally left blank
Page 4-87
CITY OF PALM DESERT BICYCLE PLAN
With a year 2015 population of 51,053 per the California
Department of Finance, Palm Desert is a multifaceted community
with College of the Desert, regional retail, government agency,
residential, and resort uses. The city has a grid network of arterial
streets that connect to its two neighboring cities, Rancho Mirage
and Indian Wells, as well as to the surrounding unincorporated
areas, such as Bermuda Dunes and Thousand Palms. The main
arterial streets in the network include Gerald Ford, Frank Sinatra,
and Fred Waring Drives, Hovley Lane, Monterey and Portola
Avenues, Cook Street, and State Routes 111 and 74. Most of Palm
Desert’s destinations lie along the arterial street network.
Land Use
Figure 4-22 shows the current and future land use patterns in Palm
Desert. The city consists of low-density residential, civic buildings,
regional retail centers, and resort uses, with most of the commercial
uses located along State Route 111, Monterey Avenue, and El
Paseo. Some industrial uses are located along Cook Street. College
of the Desert is adjacent to the civic center and enrolls students
from around the Coachella Valley. Palm Desert also has art
galleries and the Living Desert Reserve. Future industrial and
commercial development is planned near Interstate 10 in the north
of the city, and residential development is planned for the north
central and eastern areas of Palm Desert. The University of
California, Riverside, and California State University, San
Bernardino, have extension campuses at the intersection of Cook
Street and Gerald Ford Drive.
AÙ
!"`$
!"`$
AÙ
AÙ
?¦
AÙ
2/1
6
/
2
0
1
6
J
N
M
:
\
M
d
a
t
a
\
1
4
4
8
3
7
\
G
I
S
\
M
X
D
\
A
c
t
i
v
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
\
L
a
n
d
U
s
e
\
C
V
A
G
P
a
l
m
D
e
s
e
r
t
L
a
n
d
U
s
e
.
m
x
d
CVAG ATP - Land UseCity of Palm Desert
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG
City Limits
Palm Desert
Land Use
Single Family Residential
Multi-Family Residential
General Office
Commercial and Services
Facilities
Education
Industrial
Transportation, Communications, and Utilities
Mixed Commercial and Industrial
Mixed Residential and Commercial
Open Space and Recreation
Union Pacific Railroad
AÙ
A±
¯0 21
Miles
CVAG ATP City of Palm Desert
Land Use
Figure 4-22
AÙ
!"`$
!"`$
AÙ
AÙ
A±
AÙ
5/2
0
/
2
0
1
6
J
N
M
:
\
M
d
a
t
a
\
1
4
4
8
3
7
\
G
I
S
\
M
X
D
\
A
c
t
i
v
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
\
C
r
a
s
h
M
a
p
s
f
r
o
m
B
r
i
a
n
\
C
V
A
G
A
T
P
P
a
l
m
D
e
s
e
r
t
C
r
a
s
h
B
a
s
i
c
A
T
P
.
m
x
d
CVAG ATP City of Palm DesertCrash Map
Figure 4-23
¯0 21Miles
AÙ
A±
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG, SWITRS
SWITRS database does not provide coordinate data for 3 pedestriancrashes and 13 bicycle crashes, therefore that data is not represented on this map.
YX Pedestrian Fatality
""Bicycle Fatality XX Pedestrian Injury
""Bicycle Injury Proposed Bicycle FacilitiesExisting Bicycle FacilitiesUnion Pacific Railroad
Page 4-90
Bikeways
Existing
Palm Desert currently has many existing bikeways totaling 62.9
miles in length. Existing bikeways are listed in Table 4-23.
All bike lanes are shared bikeway/golf lanes that permit bicycles; all
bike routes allow golf carts.
Proposed
Palm Desert has proposed bikeway projects to be included in this
Plan, divided into top priority projects and other long-term
projects. The projects are listed in Table 4-24. Project costs are
based on past expenditures for bikeways throughout California and
from feedback received from local jurisdictions. Costs for
individual projects will vary by location and complexity.
A bike path along the Whitewater River is a potential future project
for the City. Much of the land along the river is privately owned.
Constructing a bike path along the river would require negotiation
or a developer agreement for this to happen.
Figure 4-24 shows existing and proposed bikeways, bicycle parking,
and amenities.
Table 4-23. City of Palm Desert Existing Bikeways
ID # Street/Path From To Class
Regionally
Significant?
Length
(mi.)
FW04E Fred Waring Dr Indian Wells western city limit (Phyllis
Jackson Ln.)
Eldorado Dr Sidewalk path Yes 1.3
PD01E Dinah Shore Dr Monterey Ave Portola Ave/Gerald Ford Dr Bike Lanes Yes 0.9
PD02E Gateway Dr Dinah Shore Dr Gerald Ford Dr Bike Lanes No 0.9
PD03E Gerald Ford Dr Monterey Ave Cook St Bike Lanes Yes 2.0
PD04E Pacific Ave Gerald Ford Dr College Dr Bike Lanes No 0.3
PD05E College Dr Portola Ave Frank Sinatra Dr Bike Lanes No 1.4
PD06E Technology Dr College Dr Gerald Ford Dr Bike Lanes No 0.1
PD07E Frank Sinatra Dr Monterey Ave Tamarisk Row Dr Bike Lanes Yes 3.3
PD08E Tamarisk Row Dr Frank Sinatra Dr Country Club Dr Bike Lanes Yes 1.4
PD09E Country Club Dr Monterey Ave Cook St Bike Lanes Yes 2.0
PD10E Country Club Dr Cook St Washington St Bike Lanes Yes 3.1
PD11E Oasis Club Dr Country Club Dr Hovley Ln East Bike Lanes Yes 1.0
PD12E Hovley Ln West Monterey Ave Portola Ave Bike Lanes No 1.0
PD13E Hovley Ln East Cook St Washington St Bike Lanes Yes 3.1
PD14E Magnesia Falls Dr Monterey Ave Deep Canyon Rd Bike Lanes Yes 1.5
PD15E Fred Waring Dr San Pascual Ave Deep Canyon Rd Bike Lanes Yes 0.8
PD16E Haystack Rd Hwy 74 Portola Ave Bike Lanes No 1.3
PD17E Mesa View Dr Hwy 74 Portola Ave Bike Lanes Yes 0.8
PD18E Hwy 74 El Paseo Palowet Dr Bike Lanes Yes 3.1
Table 4-23, continued
Page 4-91
ID # Street/Path From To Class
Regionally
Significant?
Length
(mi.)
PD19AE San Pablo Ave El Paseo (El Paseo Shopping & Dining
Center)
Hwy 111 Bike Lanes Yes 0.1
PD19E San Pablo Ave Fred Waring Dr El Paseo (El Paseo Shopping & Dining
Center)
Bike Lanes Yes 0.5
PD20E Portola Ave Dinah Shore Dr Country Club Dr Bike Lanes Yes 2.4
PD21E Portola Ave Country Club Dr Magnesia Falls Dr Bike Lanes Yes 1.5
PD23E Portola Ave Shadow Mountain Dr Mesa View Dr Bike Lanes Yes 2.1
PD24E 35th Ave/Dick Kelly Dr Monterey Ave Dinah Shore Dr Bike Lanes No 0.7
PD25E Cook St Frank Sinatra Dr Fred Waring Dr Bike Lanes Yes 3.0
PD26E Deep Canyon Rd Magnesia Falls Dr Hwy 111 Bike Lanes Yes 1.0
PD27E Eldorado Dr Frank Sinatra Dr Hovley Ln East Bike Lanes No 2.0
PD28E A St Monterey Ave Gateway Dr Bike Lanes No 0.3
PD29E University Park Dr College Dr Cook St Bike Lanes No 0.5
PD30E Park View Dr Hwy 111 Monterey Ave Bike Lanes Yes 0.8
PD31E California Dr/ Ave of the
States
Fred Waring Dr Washington St Bike route No 2.1
PD32E Florida Ave, Elkhorn Trail California Dr Fred Waring Dr Bike route Yes 1.0
PD33E Fairway Dr Portola Ave Cook St Bike route No 1.0
PD34E Warner Trail Hovley Lane East Fred Waring Dr Bike route Yes 1.0
PD35E Whitewater River Deep Canyon Rd Cook St Bike path Yes 0.5
PD36E Michigan Dr Warner Trail Ave of the States Bike route No 0.4
PD37E Painters Path Edgehill Dr El Paseo Bike Lanes No 0.3
PD38E De Anza Way San Carlos Ave Alessandro Dr Bike route No 1.0
PD39E Deep Canyon Rd Hwy 111 Fairway Dr Bike route Yes 0.5
PD40E El Paseo Hwy 111 (West) Hwy 111 (East) Bike route Yes 1.9
PD41E Grapevine St Hwy 74 Portola Ave Bike route No 1.2
PD42E Idaho St Michigan Dr Hovley Ln. (East) Bike route No 0.1
PD43E Plaza Way Hwy 111 El Paseo Bike route No 0.2
PD44E San Gorgonio Way Monterey Ave San Carlos Ave Bike route No 0.5
PD45E San Pablo Ave Magnesia Falls Dr 700' north of Fred Waring Dr Bike route Yes 0.4
PD46E Shadow Mountain Dr Hwy 74 Tumbleweed Ln. Bike route No 0.8
PD47E Shadow Mountain Dr Tumbleweed Ln. Portola Ave Bike route/Golf Cart
route
No 0.8
PD49E Ocotillo Dr El Paseo Shadow Mountain Dr Bike route No 0.6
PD50E Edgehill Dr Painters Path Tierra del Oro Bike route No 0.7
PD51E Town Center Way Fred Waring Dr Hwy 111 Bike route Yes 0.5
PD60E Joshua Tree St San Luis Rey Ave Grapevine St Bike route No 1.0
PD61E Ironwood St Shadow Mountain Dr San Luis Rey Ave Bike route No 0.6
PD62E San Luis Rey Ave Alessandro Dr Ironwood St Bike route No 0.6
SPCCE San Pablo Ave 700' north of Fred Waring Dr Fred Waring Dr Bike route Yes 0.1
Table 4-23, continued
Page 4-92
ID # Street/Path From To Class
Regionally
Significant?
Length
(mi.)
IW02E Cook St Hwy 111 Fairway Dr Bike lanes Yes 0.5
IW10E Portola Ave Grapevine St Haystack Rd Bike lanes Yes 0.5
IW12E Hovley Ln. Indian Wells Western city limit (140
feet west of Hemingway Ct)
Via Orvieto Bike lanes/Sidewalk path Yes 0.9
RM118E Monterey Ave Dinah Shore Dr Country Club Dr Bike lanes Yes 3.1
RM119E Monterey Ave Dinah Shore Dr Frank Sinatra Dr Bike path (partial) Yes 2.1
RM120E Monterey Ave Frank Sinatra Dr Verbania Rd Bike path Yes 1.5
RM122E Parkview Dr Hwy 111 East City Limit Bike lanes Yes 0.6
RM123E Parkview Dr Hwy 111 East City Limit Bike path (partial) Yes 0.6
Page 4-93
Table 4-24. City of Palm Desert Proposed Bikeway Projects
ID # Street/Path From To Class
Regionally
Significant?
Length
(mi.)
Estimated
Cost
DCCC Deep Canyon Rd* Whitewater River Magnesia Falls Dr Bike lanes/NEV lanes Yes 1.0 $77,700
PDFPCC Whitewater River* Unspecified Unspecified connection in CV
Link Conceptual Master Plan
Bike lanes/NEV lanes No 3.6 $285,000
PD55 Portola Ave Magnesia Falls Dr Hwy 111 Colored buffered bike
lanes (with road diet)
Yes 1.8 $285,120
PD56 Mid-Valley Bike Path
(SPRR corridor)
Palm Desert Western city limit
(3250 feet nrothwest of
Monterey Ave)
Palm Desert Eastern city
limit (Washington St)
Bike path Yes 7.0 $7,451,136
PD57 Palm Valley Channel Painters Path Edgehill Dr Multipurpose Path/Golf
Cart Path
Yes 0.7 $867,610
PD57A Palm Valley Channel Edgehill Dr Tierra del Oro Multipurpose Path/Golf
Cart Path
Yes 0.7 $894,305
PD59 College of the Desert/
Civic Center Park Loop
Monterey Ave Magnesia Falls Dr Bike path/Golf Cart Path Yes 1.7 N/A (CV Link)
PD61 Whitewater Channel Magnesia Falls Dr Fred Waring Dr Bike path/NEV path Yes 1.6 N/A (CV Link)
PD62 Gerald Ford Dr Cook St Frank Sinatra Dr Bike lanes Yes 1.0 $79,200
PD66 Portola Ave Shadow Mountain Dr Chicory St Bike lanes/Golf Cart lanes Yes 0.1 $7,920
PD68 Painters Path Bridge over Palm Valley Channel Mike Schuler Trail/Bump'n
Grind Trailhead
Multipurpose Path/Golf
Cart Path
Yes 0.4 $533,914
PD77 Eldorado West Bike
Path
Fred Waring Dr Hovley Lane East Bike path/Golf Cart Path Yes 1.5 $2,750,035
PPCC Painters Path* Palm Valley Channel El Paseo Bike lanes/NEV lanes Yes 0.2 $14,250
PVCC Palm Valley Channel* Parkview Dr Painters Path (approximate) Bike path/NEV path Yes 0.6 $1,181,768
RM27 Monterey Ave Dinah Shore Dr Gerald Ford Dr Bike lanes/Golf Cart lanes Yes 1.0 $79,200
RM138 Joshua Rd Magnesia Falls Dr End of Joshua Rd Bike route Yes 0.5 $18,176
RM145 Monterey Ave Dinah Shore Dr Frank Sinatra Dr Bike path (partial)** Yes 2.1 $1,209,828
RM146 Monterey Ave Verbenia Rd Clancy Ln Bike path Yes 0.3 $267,723
RM152 Parkview Dr Hwy 111 East City Limit Bike path (partial)** Yes 0.6 $328,774
WSPD Wayfinding Signage $104,000
BPPD Bicycle Parking Program $75,000
TOTAL $16,510,659
*Planned regional active transportation project with assumed facility type for costing purposes.
**Bike facilities will not exist on both sides of the road for the complete section under the proposed condition.
AÙ
!"`$
!"`$
A±
AÙ
AÙ
AÙ
UNIONPACIFICRR
4/1
7
/
2
0
1
7
J
N
M
:
\
M
d
a
t
a
\
1
4
4
8
3
7
\
G
I
S
\
M
X
D
\
A
c
t
i
v
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
\
A
T
P
C
i
t
y
M
a
p
s
\
L
o
c
a
l
M
X
D
s
F
i
n
a
l
\
L
o
c
a
l
M
a
p
s
N
o
I
D
N
e
w
S
y
m
b
o
l
o
g
y
9
_
1
4
_
1
6
\
C
V
A
G
A
T
P
P
a
l
m
D
e
s
e
r
t
n
o
I
D
U
p
d
a
t
e
.
m
x
d
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG
¯0 21Miles
!!20
!!16
!!16
!!6
!!5
!!5
!!16
!!20
!!6
!!6
!!16 !!16
!!6
!!16
!!16
!!20 !!20
!!6
!!6
!!6
!!20
!!16
!!16
!!6
!!16
""20
""22
""16
""20
""22
""18
""20
""22
""7
""21
""12
""12
!!1
!!20
!!1
!!6
!!20!!20
!!18
!!20
AÙ
A±
CVAG ATP City of Palm DesertLocal Network
Figure 4-24
"#= Proposed Index
"8"7
"2
"6
"9
"10
"11
"12
"13
"14
"16
"17
"18
"19
"20
"3
"1
"4
Bike pathBike/NEV path
Multipurpose path Multipurpose NEV path
Bike laneBike/NEV lane
Buffered bike lane
Buffered bike/NEV laneColored bike lane
Colored bike/NEV laneColored buffered bike lane
Colored buffered bike/NEV lane
Double colored buffered bike laneBike route
Greenback sharrowsBike path (partial)
Bike lanes (partial)Golf path
"21
"22Golf laneN/A
Proposed Bicycle Facilities Existing Bicycle Facilities
Bike pathMultipurpose pathSidewalk path
Bike laneBuffered bike lane
Bike route
Greenback sharrows
Bike path (partial)
(!#= Existing Index
(!1
(!3
(!6
(!8
(!5
(!16
(!17
(!18
Colored buffered bike lane
Colored buffered bike lane/NEV lane(!12
(!13
Bike lanes (partial)
Golf path(!19
(!20
Proposed Transit Bike Parking
Bike Parking
*#Proposed
*#ExistingBike Amenities
*#Proposed
#Existing
*#Bike Locker
##Bike Rack
CVAG ATP Facilities Identifier
City of Palm Desert
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG
¯0 21
Miles
See CVAG ATP Chapter 4
Table for Facility ID Reference
Proposed Bicycle Facilities
Existing Bicycle Facilities
!!
City of Palm Desert
Local Network with ATP IDs
Figure 4-24a
Page 4-96
Bicycle Parking
Existing
The city of Palm Desert has identified several locations where
bicycle parking facilities exist. They are listed below.
City Hall
College of the Desert
California State University, San Bernardino, extension
campus
University of California, Riverside, extension campus
The Living Desert
Several locations along El Paseo
Monterey Shore Plaza shopping center
Entrepreneur and Enfield Lanes
Post Office
Hovley and Washington Streets
Waring Shopping Center
Palm Desert Town Center
Portola Community Center
All schools
All parks
Proposed
Bicycle parking will be added:
At College of the Desert
Along El Paseo
Along CV Link
At planned trailheads
The City also has a Transportation Demand Management (TDM)
ordinance that requires bicycle parking spaces to equal 5 percent of
auto parking spaces at new commercial developments.
Links to Other Transportation Modes
The City is served by SunLine Transit, which has bicycle racks on
every bus in its fleet. The older SunLine bus racks hold two
bicycles, but the new state-of-the-art racks will hold three bicycles
per bus and are very convenient to use for the bicyclist. No transit
stations or park-and-ride facilities currently exist in the city.
Bike racks and/or bike lockers are proposed by SunLine Transit at
selected bus stop locations in the city. These are presented in Table
4-25.
Table 4-25. Proposed Bus Stop Locations for Bike Racks and/ or
Bike Lockers in Palm Desert
Line(s) Street Cross Street Stop # Direction Position* Facility
Type
111/52/
32
Town Center
Way Hahn 65 NB NS Bike
locker
111/54 Town Center
Way Hahn 67 SB FS Bike
locker
32 Gerald Ford Dr Cook St 205 WB FS Bike
rack
53/111 SR 111 Desert
Crossing 536 EB FS Bike
rack
111 Monterey Ave
San
Gorgonio
Way
778 NB NS Bike
rack
70 Harris Ln Washington
St 839 WB FS Bike
rack
111 SR 111 Monterey
Ave 873 EB FS Bike
rack
32 Dinah
Shore Dr Shoppers Ln 938 WB FS Bike
rack
* Position refers to the near side (NS) or far side (FS) of the intersection
Page 4-97
Bicycle Amenities
Showers and clothing lockers will be available to bicycle
commuters at College of the Desert. The City of Palm Desert
Transportation Demand Management ordinance requires new
nonresidential developments to preserve 2 percent of the gross
floor area ratio for employee locker and shower facilities.
Bicycle Safety Education and Police Enforcement
The Sheriff’s Department has a bicycle safety education program.
The department has a full-time public information officer who
promotes bicycle safety issues to anyone who is interested.
Generally, the department gives the program to elementary school
students in grades 4 through 7. The department provides basic
information about safe riding techniques and the vehicle code.
Parents are encouraged to attend so they can support the safety
message to their children. The Sheriff’s Department gives out
helmets to students who do not have one.
The officer provides a helmet instruction course and shows safety
videos whenever someone wants to view them. Videos are typically
shown at the Sheriff’s Department. Law enforcement officers also
hold a bike rodeo at the Annual Palm Desert Safety Fair. Helmets
are also given out at the bike rodeo.
Palm Desert is applying to become recognized by the League of
American Bicyclists as a Bicycle-Friendly Community. The League
has certified instructors in Palm Desert who plan to go to schools
to host bicycle safety education events.
The County Sheriff’s Department enforces all traffic laws for
bicycles and motor vehicles as part of regular duties in Palm
Desert. Officers ticket violators as they see them. This includes
bicyclists who break traffic laws, as well as motorists who disobey
traffic laws and make the cycling environment more dangerous.
The level of enforcement depends on the availability of officers.
The Sheriff’s Department uses targeted enforcement to encourage
motorists and cyclists to share the road. Officers also respond to
particular needs and problems as they arise. In addition, the
Sheriff’s Department dispatches a fleet of bicycle-mounted officers
in the city. These officers have had special training in bicycle safety
and assist in enforcing traffic laws.
Wayfinding Signage
The City will seek funds for a citywide bikeway wayfinding signage
program. The wayfinding signage will connect with CV Link and
with downtown.
Past Expenditures for Bicycle Facilities
Palm Desert received $2.3 million in Congestion Management and
Air Quality funds for the Mid-Valley Bike Path along the right-of-
way next to the railroad track parallel to I-10. The City has funded
bike lanes from its own General Fund, as well as from other funds.
Since 2001, approximately 23 miles of bike lanes have been added.
The Police Department, which is served under a contract with the
Sheriff’s Department, receives a grant that supports the cost of
presentations at elementary schools.
Maintenance Policies
The City of Palm Desert deals with maintenance on a case-by-case
basis. The City restripes all streets every 12 to 18 months and uses
a pavement management system every five to seven years.
Streetlights are mostly located at signalized intersections. Southern
California Edison maintains streetlight bulbs on a case-by-case
basis and checks signal lights every two years.
Page 4-98
Other Related Policies
The City of Palm Desert is completing a General Plan update that
incorporates a Complete Streets approach. The City currently has
an Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Transition Plan. The
City does not have a Safe Routes to School (SRTS) Plan.
Coordination with Neighboring Jurisdictions
Since this Plan covers the entire Coachella and Palo Verde Valleys,
the plans of neighboring cities and the unincorporated county were
coordinated to ensure links.
Future Financial Needs
The City of Palm Desert has the following future financial needs:
Total proposed bikeways 26.1 miles
Total proposed bikeways cost $16,331,659
Bicycle parking program $75,000
Wayfinding signage $104,000
Total capital financial need $16,510,659
Annual Class I bike path maintenance budget
10.4 miles, $104,000/year
Safe Routes to School Program $50,000/year
Grant Reporting Policies
The City of Palm Desert follows specific reporting guidelines for
each grant it receives.
CITY OF PALM SPRINGS
This page intentionally left blank
Page 4-99
CITY OF PALM SPRINGS BICYCLE PLAN
With a year 2015 population of 46,611 per the California
Department of Finance, Palm Springs is a major tourist destination
city, with resorts and golf communities as well as an established
residential base. The city has a developed grid network of arterial
streets that connect to Cathedral City as well as to the surrounding
unincorporated areas. The main arterial streets in the network
include Vista Chino, Ramon Road, North, South, and East Palm
Canyon Drives, Sunrise Way, Farrell Drive, Racquet Club Road,
and Indian Canyon Drive. Most of the city’s destinations are
located along the arterial street network, especially along Palm
Canyon and Indian Canyon Drives in the downtown retail district.
Land Use
Figure 4-25 shows the current and future land use patterns in Palm
Springs. The city consists primarily of medium- and low-density
residential, with many resort uses near the downtown area.
Commercial office and retail uses are primarily located along
Ramon Road and North and East Palm Canyon Drives, especially
in the downtown area. The city is home to Palm Springs
International Airport, and many industrial uses are located near the
airport. The far northern part of the city contains utility uses, which
include a wind farm for renewable energy. Future residential
development is planned in the northern part of the existing
developed area of the city. College of the Desert plans to open a
new campus near the Whitewater River and Indian Canyon Drive.
Outlying areas are planned for very low-density residential, such as
on Indian reservation land, and undeveloped land.
!"`$
AÙ
!"`$
AÙ
2/
1
9
/
2
0
1
6
J
N
M
:
\
M
d
a
t
a
\
1
4
4
8
3
7
\
G
I
S
\
M
X
D
\
A
c
t
i
v
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
\
L
a
n
d
U
s
e
\
C
V
A
G
P
a
l
m
S
p
r
i
n
g
s
L
a
n
d
U
s
e
.
m
x
d
CVAG ATP - Land UseCity of Palm Springs
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG
City Limits
Palm Springs
Land Use
Single Family Residential
Multi-Family Residential
Mixed Residential
General Office
Commercial and Services
Facilities
Education
Industrial
Transportation, Communications, and Utilities
Mixed Commercial and Industrial
Mixed Residential and Commercial
Open Space and Recreation
Specific Plan
Union Pacific Railroad
¯0 21
Miles
CVAG ATP City of Palm Springs
Land Use
Figure 4-25
?u
!"`$
!"`$
AÌ
5/2
0
/
2
0
1
6
J
N
M
:
\
M
d
a
t
a
\
1
4
4
8
3
7
\
G
I
S
\
M
X
D
\
A
c
t
i
v
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
\
C
r
a
s
h
M
a
p
s
f
r
o
m
B
r
i
a
n
\
C
V
A
G
A
T
P
P
a
l
m
S
p
r
i
n
g
s
N
o
r
t
h
C
r
a
s
h
B
a
s
i
c
A
T
P
.
m
x
d
CVAG ATP City of Palm SpringsCrash Map
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG, SWITRS Figure 4-26a
¯0 21Miles
SAN RAFAEL DR
PALM
CANYON
DR
INDIANCANYON
DR
RACQUET CLUB RD
AVENIDA
CABALLEROS
FARRELL
DR
VISTA CHINO
FRANCIS DR
VIA MI
R
A
L
E
S
T
E
CE
R
R
I
T
O
S
R
D
JOYCEDR
FA
R
R
E
L
L
D
R
VIA ESCUELA
PASEO ELMIRADOR
SU
N
R
I
S
E
W
A
Y
VIA
M
I
R
A
L
E
S
T
E
AÌ
m mSee City of Palm Springs - Center
SWITRS database does not provide coordinate data for 8 pedestriancrashes and 11 bicycle crashes, therefore that data is not represented on this map.
YX Pedestrian Fatality
""Bicycle Fatality XX Pedestrian Injury
""Bicycle Injury Proposed Bicycle FacilitiesExisting Bicycle Facilities
5/2
0
/
2
0
1
6
J
N
M
:
\
M
d
a
t
a
\
1
4
4
8
3
7
\
G
I
S
\
M
X
D
\
A
c
t
i
v
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
\
C
r
a
s
h
M
a
p
s
f
r
o
m
B
r
i
a
n
\
C
V
A
G
A
T
P
P
a
l
m
S
p
r
i
n
g
s
C
e
n
t
e
r
C
r
a
s
h
B
a
s
i
c
A
T
P
.
m
x
d
CVAG ATP City of Palm SpringsCrash Map
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG, SWITRS Figure 4-26b
¯0 21Miles
XW
XW
XW XW
XW XW
XW
XWXW
XW
XW
XW
XW
XW
XW XW
XW
XW
XW
")
")
")
")
")
")
")
")
")
")
INDIA
NCANYON
DR
ALEJO RD
PA
L
M
C
A
N
Y
O
N
DR
BE
L
A
R
D
O
R
D
TAHQUITZ
CANYONWAY
PA
T
E
N
C
I
O
R
D
VINE
A
V
E
CHINO DR
ARENAS RD
BARISTO RD
RAMON RD
MU
S
E
U
M
D
R
BE
L
A
R
D
O
R
D
AMADO RD
BARISTO
RD
AV
E
N
I
D
A
C
A
B
A
L
L
E
R
O
S
CA
L
L
E
E
L
S
E
G
U
N
D
O
CA
L
L
E
E
N
C
I
L
I
A
CA
H
U
I
L
L
A
R
D
AÙ
m mSee City of Palm Springs - South
m mSee City of Palm Springs - North
SWITRS database does not provide coordinate data for 8 pedestriancrashes and 11 bicycle crashes, therefore that data is not represented on this map.
YX Pedestrian Fatality
""Bicycle Fatality XX Pedestrian Injury
""Bicycle Injury Proposed Bicycle FacilitiesExisting Bicycle Facilities
EL
C
I
E
L
O
R
D
PALM CANYON DR
RAMON RD
LA VER
N
E
W
A
Y
BE
L
A
R
D
O
RD
FARRELLDR
CA
M
I
N
O
RE
A
L
BA
R
O
N
A
R
D
CAMINO PAROCELA
SUNNY DUNES RD
GE
N
E
A
U
T
R
Y
T
R
L
MESQUITEAVE
ESCOBA DR
CO
M
P
A
D
R
E
R
D
CAMINO
R
E
A
L
MA
N
Z
A
N
I
T
A
A
V
E
MESQUITE AVE
CA
L
L
E
P
A
L
O
F
I
E
R
R
O
PA
L
M
C
A
N
Y
O
N
D
R
TWIN PALMS DR
AR
A
B
Y
D
R
MURRAY
C
A
N
Y
O
N
D
R
BOGERT TRL
TO
L
E
D
O
AV
E
AVENIDA GRANADA
SUNNY DUNES RD
CR
O
S
S
L
E
Y
R
D
34TH AVE
DINAH SHORE DR
SU
N
R
I
S
E
WA
Y
DEEP WELL RD
AÙ
5/2
0
/
2
0
1
6
J
N
M
:
\
M
d
a
t
a
\
1
4
4
8
3
7
\
G
I
S
\
M
X
D
\
A
c
t
i
v
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
\
C
r
a
s
h
M
a
p
s
f
r
o
m
B
r
i
a
n
\
C
V
A
G
A
T
P
P
a
l
m
S
p
r
i
n
g
s
S
o
u
t
h
C
r
a
s
h
B
a
s
i
c
A
T
P
.
m
x
d
CVAG ATP City of Palm SpringsCrash Map
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG, SWITRS Figure 4-26c
¯0 21Miles
m mSee City of Palm Springs - Center
SWITRS database does not provide coordinate data for 8 pedestriancrashes and 11 bicycle crashes, therefore that data is not represented on this map.
YX Pedestrian Fatality
""Bicycle Fatality XX Pedestrian Injury
""Bicycle Injury Proposed Bicycle FacilitiesExisting Bicycle Facilities
Page 4-104
Bikeways
Existing
Palm Springs currently has numerous bikeways. Several designated
loop routes in the central portion of the city are primarily geared
toward the tourist visitor. These loop routes consist of Class I (bike
paths), Class II (bike lanes), and Class III (bike routes) facilities
totaling 40 miles in length. Existing bicycle and trail facilities are
listed in Table 4-26.
Proposed
The City of Palm Springs has identified a number of proposed
bikeway projects to be included in this Plan. The projects are listed
in Table 4-27. Project costs are based on past expenditures for
bikeways throughout California, as well as discussions with local
jurisdictions. Costs for individual projects will vary by location and
complexity.
Figure 4-27 shows existing and proposed bikeways and parking
facilities, schools, and attractions, which primarily include shopping
centers, government buildings, and other retail districts.
Table 4-26. City of Palm Springs Existing Bikeways
ID # Street/Path From To Class
Regionally
Significant?
Length
(mi.)
PS01E Tahquitz Creek Calle Palo Fierro to
Sunrise Way
Sunny Dunes Rd to
Farrell Dr
Bike path No 1.3
PS02E Palm Canyon Wash Gene Autry Trail Landau Blvd. (Landau
Blvd. Does not extend
this far south) ZP
Bike path No 1.2
PS03E Alejo Rd Belardo Rd N. Palm Canyon Dr Greenback Sharrows No 0.1
PS04E Alejo Rd Via Miraleste N. Farrell Dr Colored buffered bike
lanes (with road diet)
No 1.3
PS05E Alejo Rd N. Farrell Dr N. Civic Dr Bike route No 0.2
PS06E Avenida Caballeros W. Ramon Rd E. Tamarisk Rd Bike lanes Yes 1.3
PS07E Avenida Caballeros E. Vista Chino E. San Rafael Dr Bike lanes Yes 1.0
PS08E Baristo Rd El Cielo Rd S. Avenida Caballeros Bike lanes Yes 1.5
PS09E Belardo Rd W. Alejo Rd W. Amado Rd Sidewalk Path No 0.3
PS09A Belardo Rd W. Alejo Rd W. Amado Rd Greenback sharrows No 0.3
PS104 Calle Encilia E. Alejo Rd E. Arenas Rd Colored buffered bike
lanes
No 0.7
PS10E Belardo Rd W. Tahquitz Canyon
Way
W. Baristo Rd Greenback sharrows No 0.3
PS112 Camino Parocela Gene Autry Trail San Luis Rey Rd Bike lanes No 0.3
PS116 Camino Real E. Mesquite Ave Calle Palo Fierro Greenback sharrows Yes 0.1
PS11E Belardo Rd E. Sunny Dunes Rd S. Palm Canyon Dr Bike lanes Yes 0.8
PS12E Cahuilla Rd E. Tahquitz Canyon Way E. Ramon Rd Bike route No 0.5
Table 4-26, continued
Page 4-105
ID # Street/Path From To Class
Regionally
Significant?
Length
(mi.)
PS137 El Cielo Rd E. Tahquitz Canyon Way E. Ramon Rd Colored buffered bike
lanes
Yes 0.5
PS138 El Cielo Rd E. Ramon Rd E. Sunny Dunes Rd Colored buffered bike
lanes/NEV lanes (with
road diet)
No 0.2
PS139 El Cielo Rd E. Sunny Dunes Rd Escoba Dr Colored buffered bike
lanes (with road diet)
No 0.8
PS13E Calle Encilia E. Arenas Rd Ramon Rd Colored buffered bike
lanes
No 0.4
PS140 Escoba Dr E. Palm Canyon Dr El Cielo Rd Colored buffered bike
lanes
Yes 0.3
PS15E Camino Real Riverside Dr E. Palm Canyon Dr Bike route Yes 0.7
PS16E Camino Real E. Palm Canyon Dr Murray Canyon Dr Bike route Yes 1.4
PS175 Murray Canyon Dr S. Palm Canyon Dr Toledo Ave Buffered bike lanes
(with road diet)
No 1.1
PS18E Civic Dr E. Alejo Rd E. Tahquitz Canyon Way Greenback sharrows Yes 0.7
PS19E E. Palm Canyon Dr S. Sunrise Way Farrell Dr/ Barona Rd Bike route Yes 0.6
PS21E E. Palm Canyon Dr Farrell Dr Golf Club Dr Sidewalk path Yes 2.1
PS22E Farrell Dr E. Vista Chino E. Ramon Rd Bike route Yes 2.1
PS237 Via Escuela N. Sunrise Way N. Gene Autry Trail Greenback sharrows Yes 1.3
PS24E Gene Autry Trail E. Vista Chino E. Ramon Rd Bike route Yes 2.2
PS25E Golf Club Dr 34th Ave E. Palm Canyon Dr Bike lanes Yes 0.9
PS26E Indian Canyon Dr E. Tachevah Dr E. Camino Parocela Bike route Yes 1.6
PS29E Las Palmas Trail: Via Lola, Camino del Corte, Camino
Sur, Camino Cerrito, Camino Norte, Vine Ave,
Stevens Rd, Rose Ave, Crescent Dr, Belardo Rd,
Alejo Rd
Bike route No 2.7
PS30E Mesquite Ave S. Palm Canyon Dr S. Camino Real Bike route Yes 0.4
PS31E Mesquite Ave S. Sunrise Way S. Farrell Dr Bike route Yes 0.6
PS32E Mesquite Ave El Cielo Rd Vella Rd Bike route Yes 0.8
PS33E Ramon Rd S. Palm Canyon Dr S. Indian Canyon Dr Bike route Yes 0.1
PS34E Sunny Dunes Rd Gene Autry Dr Crossley Rd Buffered bike lanes No 0.5
PS35E Sunny Dunes Rd S Belardo Rd S. Camino Real Bike route No 0.6
PS38E Sunny Dunes Rd S. Camino Real S. Sunrise Way Bike lanes No 0.6
PS39E Sunrise Way Vista Chino E. Palm Canyon Dr Sidewalk path Yes 3.0
PS40E Tachevah Dr N. Palm Canyon Rd N. Indian Canyon Dr Bike route Yes 0.1
PS41E Tachevah Dr 1/ 2 way between N.
Indian Canyon Dr and N.
Via Miraleste
N. Via Miraleste Bike lanes No 0.1
PS42E Tachevah Dr N. Via Miraleste N. Avenida Caballeros Bike lanes No 0.3
PS43E Tachevah Dr N. Avenida Caballeros N. Sunrise Way Bike route No 0.5
Table 4-26, continued
Page 4-106
ID # Street/Path From To Class
Regionally
Significant?
Length
(mi.)
PS45E Tahquitz Canyon Way Indian Canyon Dr N. Calle El Segundo Bike route Yes 0.2
PS46E Tahquitz Canyon Way N. Calle El Segundo Avenida Caballeros Colored buffered bike
lanes/NEV lanes
Yes 0.3
PS47E Tahquitz Canyon Way Avenida Caballeros El Cielo Rd Colored buffered bike
lanes
Yes 1.5
PS48E Toledo Ave S. La Verne Way Murray Canyon Dr Colored bike lanes
(with road diet)
No 0.9
PS49E Via Escuela E Via Escuela Hwy 111 Bike route Yes 1.2
PS50E Vista Chino N. Avenida Caballeros N. Sunrise Way Sidewalk path Yes 0.5
PS51E Vista Chino N. Sunrise Way N. Gene Autry Trail Bike route Yes 1.3
PS65 Alejo Rd N. Palm Canyon Rd Indian Canyon Dr Colored buffered bike
lanes/NEV lanes
Yes 0.1
PS66 Alejo Rd Indian Canyon Dr Via Miraleste Greenback sharrows Yes 0.3
PS95 Belardo Rd W. Amado Rd W. Tahquitz Canyon Way Colored buffered bike
lanes
No 0.3
PS98 Belardo Rd W. Baristo Rd W. Ramon Rd Colored buffered bike
lanes (7')
No 0.3
PS99 Belardo Rd W. Ramon Rd E. Sunny Dunes Rd Colored buffered bike
lanes
No 0.3
CC06E Cathedral Canyon Dr Ramon Rd Hwy 111 Bike lanes Yes 2.4
Page 4-107
Table 4-27. City of Palm Springs Proposed Bikeway Projects
ID # Street/Path From To Class
Regionally
Significant?
Length
(mi.)
Estimated
Cost
DL02 Dillon Rd Palm Springs Western city limit
(990 feet west of Diablo Rd)
Eastern city limit (2660 feet
east of Karen Ave)
Bike lanes Yes 1.5 $118,800
PS100 Belardo Rd E. Sunny Dunes Rd S. Palm Canyon Dr Colored buffered bike
lanes
Yes 0.8 $126,720
PS101 Bogert Trail S. Palm Canyon Dr Palm Spring City limit (210
feet south of Avenida Sevilla)
Bike route No 1.8 $66,528
PS102 Calle El Segundo E. Alejo Rd E. Amado Rd Buffered bike lanes No 0.3 $30,096
PS103 Calle El Segundo E. Amado Rd Ramon Rd Buffered Bike Lanes / NEV
lanes (with road diet)
No 0.8 $80,256
PS106 Calle Palo Fierro E. Ramon Rd N. Riverside Dr Bike route No 0.3 $11,088
PS107 Calle Palo Fierro E. Mesquite Rd Ave Granada Bike route No 1.6 $59,136
PS111 Camino Parocela El Cielo Rd Gene Autry Trail Bike route No 0.5 $18,480
PS113 Camino Real Ramon Rd N. Riverside Dr Bike route No 0.4 $14,784
PS114 Camino Real S. Riverside Dr San Lorenzo Rd Greenback sharrows Yes 0.1 $6,864
PS115 Camino Real San Lorenzo Rd E. Mesquite Ave Greenback sharrows Yes 0.1 $6,864
PS117 Camino Real Calle Palo Fierro E. Palm Canyon Dr Greenback sharrows Yes 0.4 $27,456
PS118 Camino Real E. Palm Canyon Dr E. La Verne Way Buffered bike lanes (with
road diet)
Yes 0.5 $50,160
PS120 Cerritos Dr Joyce Dr Amado Rd Bike route No 2.2 $81,312
PS122 Civic Dr E. Tahquitz Canyon Way E. Baristo Rd Bike route Yes 0.3 $11,088
PS123 Compadre Rd E. Mesquite Ave Sonora Rd Bike route No 0.3 $11,088
PS124 Crossley Rd E. Ramon Rd 34th Ave Buffered bike lanes (with
road diet)
Yes 1.1 $110,352
PS128 Dinah Shore Dr Gene Autry Trail East Palm Springs City Limit
(1450 feet west of
Whispering Palms Trail)
Colored buffered bike
lanes
Yes 1.0 $158,400
PS130 E. Palm Canyon Dr S. Palm Canyon Dr S. Indian Trail Bike route Yes 0.4 $14,784
PS131 E. Palm Canyon Dr S. Indian Trail Farrell Dr Bike route Yes 1.2 $44,352
PS141 Escoba Dr El Cielo Rd End Bike route No 0.3 $11,088
PS142 Farrell Dr E. Joyce Rd E. Racquet Club Dr Bike route Yes 0.5 $18,480
PS143 Farrell Dr E. Racquet Club Dr E. Vista Chino Bike route Yes 0.5 $18,480
PS144 Farrell Dr E. Tahquitz Canyon Way Baristo Rd Bike route Yes 0.3 $11,088
PS144A Farrell Dr Baristo Rd E Ramon Rd Bike route Yes 0.3 $11,088
PS145 Farrell Dr E. Ramon Rd Tahquitz Creek Trail Double colored buffered
bike lanes (with road diet)
Yes 0.2 $31,680
PS145A Farrell Dr Tahquitz Creek Trail E. Palm Canyon Dr Double colored buffered
bike lanes (with road diet)
Yes 0.8 $126,720
PS146 Francis Dr N. Indian Canyon Dr N. Farrell Dr Bike route No 1.5 $55,440
PS256 Garnet Ave* Garnet Rd Indian Canyon Dr Bike lanes/NEV lanes No 2.4 $190,080
Table 4-27, continued
Page 4-108
ID # Street/Path From To Class
Regionally
Significant?
Length
(mi.)
Estimated
Cost
PS147 Gene Autry Trail I-10 E. Via Escuela Buffered bike lanes (add 4'
buffer)
Yes 2.1 $210,672
PS147A Gene Autry Trail I-10 Overpass Whitewater River Multipurpose path/NEV
path
Yes 2.1 $2,683,296
PS148 Gene Autry Trail E. Via Escuela E. Vista Chino Bike route Yes 0.3 $11,088
PS149 Gene Autry Trail E. Vista Chino Palm Springs Air Museum Bike path Yes 0.8 $805,167
PS149A Gene Autry Trail Palm Springs Air Museum 0.6 mi south of Gene Autry
Trail/south end of golf
course
Bike path Yes 0.6 $610,184
PS149B Gene Autry Trail 0.6 mi south of Gene Autry
Trail/south end of golf course
Tahquitz Creek Channel Bike path Yes 1.8 $1,786,281
PS149C Gene Autry Trail Tahquitz Creek Channel 600' south of Tahquitz Creek
Channel
Bike path Yes 0.1 $119,698
PS149D Gene Autry Trail 600' south of Tahquitz Creek
Channel
E. Palm Canyon Dr Bike path Yes 0.5 $528,046
PS251 Gene Autry Trail E. Vista Chino Palm Springs Air Museum Bike route Yes 0.8 $29,568
PS252 Gene Autry Trail Palm Springs Air Museum 0.6 mi south of Gene Autry
Trail/south end of golf
course
Bike route Yes 36.0 $1,330,560
PS253 Gene Autry Trail 0.6 mi south of Gene Autry
Trail/south end of golf course
Tahquitz Creek Channel Bike route Yes 1.8 $66,528
PS254 Gene Autry Trail Tahquitz Creek Channel 600' south of Tahquitz Creek
Channel
Bike route Yes 0.1 $3,696
PS255 Gene Autry Trail 600' south of Tahquitz Creek
Channel
E. Palm Canyon Dr Bike route Yes 0.5 $18,480
PS153 Hermosa Dr E. Tachevah Dr E. Arenas Rd Bike route No 1.2 $44,352
PS249 Hermosa Dr* Baristo Channel Ramon Rd Bike lanes/NEV lanes No 0.1 $7,920
PS155 Indian Canyon Dr I-10 Amtrak Station Buffered bike lanes (add 4'
buffer)
Yes 0.8 $80,256
PS155A Indian Canyon Dr Amtrak Station Whitewater River Buffered bike lanes (add 4'
buffer)
Yes 1.4 $140,448
PS155B Indian Canyon Dr Whitewater River Sunrise Pkwy Buffered bike lanes (add 4'
buffer)
Yes 0.0 $2,006
PS156 Indian Canyon Dr Sunrise Pkwy. San Rafael Dr Bike lanes (with road diet) Yes 0.7 $55,440
PS157 Indian Canyon Dr San Rafael Dr E. Alejo Rd Greenback sharrows Yes 2.1 $144,144
PS163 Indian Canyon Dr E. Alejo Rd E. Camino Parocela Bike route Yes 1.1 $40,656
PS165 Joyce Rd N. Sunrise Way N. Farrell Dr Bike route No 0.5 $18,480
PS166 Kirk Douglas Way/
Airport
E. Tahquitz Canyon Way E. Ramon Rd Bike route Yes 1.6 $59,136
PS167 La Verne Way S. Palm Canyon Dr S. Sunrise Way Buffered bike lanes (with
road diet)
No 1.1 $110,352
Table 4-27, continued
Page 4-109
ID # Street/Path From To Class
Regionally
Significant?
Length
(mi.)
Estimated
Cost
PS168 Mesquite Ave West End S. Belardo Rd Bike route Yes 0.3 $11,088
PS169 Mesquite Ave S. Belardo Rd S. Palm Canyon Dr Bike route Yes 0.1 $3,696
PS170 Mesquite Ave S. Palm Canyon Dr S. Sunrise Way Bike route Yes 1.0 $36,960
PS172 Mesquite Ave S. Sunrise Way S. Farrell Dr Double colored buffered
bike lanes (with road diet)
Yes 0.6 $95,040
PS173 Mesquite Ave El Cielo Rd S. Gene Autry Trail Greenback sharrows Yes 1.1 $75,504
PS176 N. Palm Canyon Palm Springs North City Limit
(3270 feet north of Overture Dr)
Vista Chino Bike route Yes 5.3 $195,888
PS177 N. Palm Canyon Vista Chino Alejo Rd Greenback sharrows Yes 1.0 $68,640
PS180 N./ S. Palm Canyon Rd Alejo Rd Ramon Rd Bike route Yes 1.2 $44,352
PS248 Palm Canyon Wash* S. Toledo Ave Gene Autry Bike lanes/NEV lanes No 2.4 $190,080
PS181 Paseo El Mirador N. Via Miraleste N. Sunrise Way Bike route No 0.8 $29,568
PS184 Racquet Club Dr N. Palm Canyon Dr N. Indian Canyon Dr Bike route Yes 0.3 $11,088
PS185 Racquet Club Dr N. Indian Canyon Dr N. Farrell Dr Bike route No 1.5 $55,440
PS186 Racquet Club Rd,
Cardillo Ave, Via
Escuela, Via Norte,
Vista Chino, Via
Monte Vista
N. Palm Canyon Dr Crescent Dr Bike route Yes 2.5 $92,400
PS187 Ramon Rd S. Palm Canyon Dr S. Indian Canyon Dr Greenback sharrows Yes 0.1 $6,864
PS188 Ramon Rd S. Indian Canyon Dr Calle Palo Fierro Greenback sharrows Yes 0.2 $13,728
PS190 Ramon Rd Calle Palo Fierro S. Avenida Caballeros Greenback sharrows Yes 0.3 $20,592
PS191 Ramon Rd S. Avenida Caballeros Hermosa Dr Greenback sharrows Yes 1.1 $75,504
PS191A Ramon Rd Hermosa Dr Baristo Channel Greenback sharrows Yes 0.2 $13,728
PS191B Ramon Rd Baristo Channel S. Farrell Dr Greenback sharrows Yes 0.6 $41,184
PS193 Ramon Rd S. Farrell Dr El Cielo Rd Greenback sharrows Yes 0.4 $27,456
PS194 Ramon Rd El Cielo Rd Gene Autry Trail Greenback sharrows Yes 1.0 $68,640
PS196 Ramon Rd Gene Autry Trail San Luis Rey Rd Greenback sharrows Yes 0.3 $17,846
PS196A Ramon Rd Gene Autry Trail San Luis Rey Rd Colored bike lanes Yes 0.3 $34,320
PS197 Ramon Rd San Luis Rey Rd Crossley Rd Greenback sharrows Yes 0.2 $16,474
PS197A Ramon Rd San Luis Rey Rd Crossley Rd Colored buffered bike
lanes/NEV lanes
Yes 0.2 $46,886
PS198 S. Palm Canyon Dr W. Ramon Rd E. Camino Parocela Bike route Yes 0.2 $7,392
PS199 S. Palm Canyon Dr E. Camino Parocela Morongo Rd Bike route Yes 0.6 $22,176
PS200 S. Palm Canyon Dr Morongo Rd E. Palm Canyon Dr Bike route Yes 0.2 $7,392
PS201 S. Palm Canyon Dr E. Palm Canyon Dr Murray Canyon Dr Colored buffered bike
lanes (with road diet)
No 1.6 $253,440
PS201A S. Palm Canyon Dr Murray Canyon Dr Palm Springs South City Limit
(Acanto Dr)
Colored buffered bike
lanes (with road diet)
No 0.6 $95,040
PS202A S. Palm Canyon Dr* Palm Springs South City Limit
(Acanto Dr)
Indian Canyons (38500 S
Palm Canyon Dr)
Bike lanes/NEV lanes No 0.7 $55,440
Table 4-27, continued
Page 4-110
ID # Street/Path From To Class
Regionally
Significant?
Length
(mi.)
Estimated
Cost
PS203 San Luis Rey Rd Mission Dr E. Ramon Rd Bike route Yes 0.3 $11,088
PS203A San Luis Rey Rd Mission Dr E. Ramon Rd Buffered bike lanes Yes 0.3 $30,096
PS204 San Luis Rey Rd E. Ramon Rd Sunny Dunes Rd Buffered bike lanes/NEV
lanes
No 0.3 $30,096
PS205 San Rafael Dr N. Palm Canyon Rd N. Virginia Rd Buffered bike lanes (with
road diet)
No 0.4 $40,128
PS206 San Rafael Dr N. Virginia Rd Indian Canyon Dr Bike route No 0.3 $11,088
PS207 San Rafael Dr N. Indian Canyon Dr N. Sunrise Way Buffered bike lanes (with
road diet)
No 1.0 $100,320
PS209 Sunny Dunes Rd S. Palm Canyon Dr Calle Palo Fierro Buffered bike lanes No 0.2 $20,064
PS210 Sunny Dunes Rd El Cielo Rd Gene Autry Trail Bike route No 1.0 $36,960
PS211 Sunrise Way Whitewater River E. San Rafael Dr Buffered bike lanes Yes 0.6 $60,192
PS212 Sunrise Way E. San Rafael Dr E. Vista Chino Buffered bike lanes (with
road diet)
Yes 1.0 $100,320
PS213 Sunrise Way E. Vista Chino E. Tamarisk Rd Colored buffered bike
lanes
Yes 0.8 $126,720
PS214 Sunrise Way E. Tamarisk Rd E. Alejo Rd Colored bike lanes Yes 0.3 $39,600
PS215 Sunrise Way E. Alejo Rd E. Palm Canyon Dr Colored buffered bike
lanes
Yes 2.1 $332,640
PS218 Tachevah Dr N. Palm Canyon Rd N. Indian Canyon Dr Bike lane (with road diet) Yes 0.1 $7,920
PS219 Tachevah Dr N. Indian Canyon Dr 1/ 2 way to N. Via Miraleste Bike lane (remove center-
turn lane)
No 0.1 $7,920
PS220 Tachevah Dr 1/ 2 way between N. Indian
Canyon Dr and N. Via Miraleste
N. Via Miraleste Buffered bike lanes
(remove center-turn lane)
No 0.1 $10,032
PS221 Tachevah Dr N. Via Miraleste N. Avenida Caballeros Buffered bike lanes
(remove center-turn lane)
No 0.3 $30,096
PS223 Tachevah Dr N. Paseo de Anza N. Sunrise Way Colored bike lanes (6'-7') No 0.1 $13,200
PS224 Tachevah Dr N. Sunrise Way Cerritos Dr Buffered bike lanes No 0.3 $30,096
PS225 Tachevah Dr Cerritos Dr N. Farrell Dr Bike route No 0.3 $11,088
PS226 Tahquitz Canyon Way N. Museum Dr N. Indian Canyon Dr Colored bike lanes Yes 0.3 $39,600
PS228 Tahquitz Canyon Way N. Indian Canyon Dr N. Calle El Segundo Greenback sharrows Yes 0.2 $13,728
PS231 Tamarisk Rd N. Palm Canyon Dr N. Farrell Dr Bike route Yes 1.7 $62,832
PS246 Tramway Rd West End of Tramway Rd (Aerial
Tram)
Hwy 111 Two-way multipurpose
path
No 3.7 $4,454,208
PS236 Twin Palms Dr S. Palm Canyon Dr S. La Verne Way Bike route No 1.0 $36,960
PS238 Via Miraleste E. Francis Dr E. Vista Chino Greenback sharrows No 0.8 $54,912
PS239 Via Miraleste E. Vista Chino E. Tachevah Dr Colored buffered bike
lanes
No 0.5 $79,200
PS240 Via Miraleste E. Tachevah Dr E. Tamarisk Rd Colored bike lanes No 0.3 $39,600
PS241 Via Miraleste E. Tamarisk Rd E. Alejo Rd Greenback sharrows No 0.3 $20,592
Table 4-27, continued
Page 4-111
ID # Street/Path From To Class
Regionally
Significant?
Length
(mi.)
Estimated
Cost
PS242 Vista Chino N. Palm Canyon Rd N. Indian Canyon Dr Colored buffered bike
lanes
Yes 0.1 $15,840
PS243 Vista Chino N. Indian Canyon Dr N. Sunrise Way Double colored buffered
bike lanes
Yes 1.0 $158,400
PS244 Vista Chino N. Sunrise Way Cerritos Rd Greenback sharrows Yes 0.3 $20,592
PS245 Vista Chino Cerritos Rd Gene Autry Trail Bike route Yes 1.0 $36,960
PS245A Vista Chino Gene Autry Trail Palm Springs Eastern city
limit
Bike route Yes 0.7 $25,872
PS53 Hwy 111 Haugen-Lehmann Way Gap between Palm Springs
city limit in northwest (3560
feet east of Tipton Rd)
Bike route Yes 3.8 $140,448
PS54 Ave 20 Diablo Rd N. Indian Canyon Dr Bike lanes Yes 2.0 $158,400
PS56 Ramon Rd Crossley Rd Palm Springs East City Limit
(Landau Blvd.)
Greenback sharrows Yes 0.5 $34,320
PS56A Ramon Rd Crossley Rd Palm Springs East City Limit
(Landau Blvd.)
Colored buffered bike
lanes
Yes 0.5 $79,200
PS58 Chino Wash Hwy 111/ Chino Wash Gene Autry Trail Bike path/NEV path Yes 4.5 N/A (CV Link)
PS59 Gene Autry/ Via
Escuela
Chino Wash Whitewater River Bike path/NEV path Yes 0.2 N/A (CV Link)
PS60 Whitewater River Via Escuela Vista Chino Bike path/NEV path Yes 0.3 N/A (CV Link)
PS61 Whitewater River Vista Chino Tahquitz Creek Bike path/NEV path Yes 4.3 N/A (CV Link)
PS62 Tahquitz Creek Trail Belardo Rd Whitewater River Bike path/NEV path Yes 6.0 N/A (CV Link)
PS63 34th Ave Crossley Rd Whitewater River Bike route No 0.5 $18,480
PS70 Amado Rd N. Belardo Rd N. Calle El Segundo Colored bike lanes Yes 0.4 $52,800
PS72 Amado Rd N. Calle El Segundo N. Avenida Caballeros Colored bike lanes/ NEV
lanes
No 0.3 $52,272
PS73 Amado Rd N. Avenida Caballeros N. Hermosa Dr Colored bike lanes No 0.3 $39,600
PS74 Amado Rd N. Hermosa Dr N. Sunrise Way Buffered bike lanes No 0.3 $30,096
PS75 Amado Rd N. Sunrise Way N. Farrell Dr Bike route No 0.6 $22,176
PS76 Araby Rd E. Palm Canyon Dr Murray Canyon Dr Bike route Yes 0.4 $14,784
PS77 Arenas Rd S. Cahuilla Rd S. Palm Canyon Dr Buffered bike lanes (with
road diet)
Yes 0.1 $10,032
PS78 Arenas Rd S. Palm Canyon Dr S. Indian Canyon Dr Colored bike lanes Yes 0.1 $13,200
PS79 Arenas Rd S. Indian Canyon Dr S. Calle Encilia Buffered bike lanes (with
road diet)
No 0.1 $10,032
PS80 Arenas Rd S. Calle Encilia S. Calle El Segundo Buffered bike lanes (with
road diet)
No 0.1 $10,032
PS81 Arenas Rd S. Calle El Segundo S. Avenida Caballeros Buffered bike lanes (with
road diet)
No 0.3 $30,096
PS82 Arenas Rd S. Avenida Caballeros N. Hermosa Dr Buffered bike lanes (with
road diet)
No 0.3 $30,096
Table 4-27, continued
Page 4-112
ID # Street/Path From To Class
Regionally
Significant?
Length
(mi.)
Estimated
Cost
PS83 Avenida Granada S. Palm Canyon Dr S. Camino Real Bike route No 0.4 $14,784
PS84 Avenida Caballeros W. Ramon Rd E. Tahquitz Canyon Way Buffered bike lanes (with
road diet)
Yes 0.5 $50,160
PS85 Avenida Caballeros E. Tahquitz Canyon Way E. Amado Rd Buffered bike lanes/NEV
lanes (with road diet)
Yes 0.2 $20,064
PS86 Avenida Caballeros E. Amado Rd E. Tachevah Dr Buffered bike lanes (with
road diet)
Yes 0.8 $80,256
PS88 Avenida Caballeros E. Tachevah Dr E. Paseo El Mirador Colored buffered bike
lanes (with road diet)
Yes 0.2 $31,680
PS89 Avenida Caballeros E. Paseo El Mirador E. San Rafael Dr Buffered bike lanes (with
road diet)
Yes 1.3 $130,416
PS91 Baristo Rd El Cielo Rd Sunrise Way Colored buffered bike
lanes (with road diet)
Yes 1.0 $158,400
PS91A Baristo Rd Sunrise Way Ave. Caballeros Bike lanes (with road diet) Yes 0.5 $39,600
PS92 Barona Rd E. Palm Canyon Dr Sandcliff Rd Bike route Yes 0.1 $3,696
PS93 Barona Rd Sandcliff Rd South end Bike route Yes 0.5 $18,480
PS259 Baristo Channel N. Indian Canyon Rd Hermosa Dr Bike path/NEV path No 0.8 $1,385,472
PS258 Baristo Channel Ramon Rd Tahquitz Creek Trail Bike path/NEV path No 0.4 $692,736
PS257 Chino Wash* Tramway Rd Hwy 111 Bike Path No 1.7 $1,723,392
CC10 Whitewater River and
Abrams-Butler Trails
Whitewater Confluence with
Tahquitz Creek
Country Club Dr Bike path/NEV path Yes 4.1 N/A (CV Link)
RIV58 Tipton Rd,
Whitewater Cutoff
Hwy 111 I-10/ SR-62 connector Bike lanes No 1.1 $87,120
RIV05 Indian Ave/ N. Indian
Canyon Dr
Pierson Blvd. I-10 Fwy. Bike lanes Yes 3.9 $308,880
WSPS Wayfinding Signage $832,000
BPPS Bicycle Parking Program $75,000
TOTAL $24,670,213
*Planned regional active transportation project with assumed facility type for costing purposes.
A¡
!"`$
!"`$
AÙ
UNION PACIFIC RR
4/1
7
/
2
0
1
7
J
N
M
:
\
M
d
a
t
a
\
1
4
4
8
3
7
\
G
I
S
\
M
X
D
\
A
c
t
i
v
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
\
A
T
P
C
i
t
y
M
a
p
s
\
L
o
c
a
l
M
X
D
s
F
i
n
a
l
\
L
o
c
a
l
M
a
p
s
N
o
I
D
N
e
w
S
y
m
b
o
l
o
g
y
9
_
1
4
_
1
6
\
C
V
A
G
A
T
P
P
a
l
m
S
p
r
i
n
g
s
N
o
r
t
h
n
o
I
D
U
p
d
a
t
e
.
m
x
d
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG
¯0 21Miles
SAN RAFAEL DR
PALM
CANYON
DR
INDIANCANYON
DR
RACQUET CLUB RD
AVENIDA
CABALLEROS
FARRELL
DR
VISTA CHINO
FRANCIS DR
VIA MI
R
A
L
E
S
T
E
CE
R
R
I
T
O
S
R
D
JOYCEDR
FA
R
R
E
L
L
D
R
VIA ESCUELA
PASEO ELMIRADOR
SU
N
R
I
S
E
W
A
Y
VI
A
M
I
R
A
L
E
S
T
E
""12
""12
""16
""2""6
""1
""17
""16
""16
""8
""16
""17
""16
!!5
!!16
!!17
!!16
!!6
!!16
""16
!!5
AÙ
m mSee City of Palm Springs - Center CVAG ATP City of Palm SpringsLocal Network
Figure 4-27a
"#= Proposed Index
"8"7
"2
"6
"9
"10
"11
"12
"13
"14
"16
"17
"18
"19
"20
"3
"1
"4
Bike pathBike/NEV path
Multipurpose path Multipurpose NEV path
Bike laneBike/NEV lane
Buffered bike lane
Buffered bike/NEV laneColored bike lane
Colored bike/NEV laneColored buffered bike lane
Colored buffered bike/NEV lane
Double colored buffered bike laneBike route
Greenback sharrowsBike path (partial)
Bike lanes (partial)Golf path
"21
"22Golf laneN/A
Proposed Bicycle Facilities Existing Bicycle Facilities
Bike pathMultipurpose pathSidewalk path
Bike laneBuffered bike lane
Bike route
Greenback sharrows
Bike path (partial)
(!#= Existing Index
(!1
(!3
(!6
(!8
(!5
(!16
(!17
(!18
Colored buffered bike lane
Colored buffered bike lane/NEV lane(!12
(!13
Bike lanes (partial)
Golf path(!19
(!20
Proposed Transit Bike Parking
Bike Parking
*#Proposed
*#ExistingBike Amenities
*#Proposed
#Existing
*#Bike Locker
##Bike Rack
4/1
7
/
2
0
1
7
J
N
M
:
\
M
d
a
t
a
\
1
4
4
8
3
7
\
G
I
S
\
M
X
D
\
A
c
t
i
v
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
\
A
T
P
C
i
t
y
M
a
p
s
\
L
o
c
a
l
M
X
D
s
F
i
n
a
l
\
L
o
c
a
l
M
a
p
s
N
o
I
D
N
e
w
S
y
m
b
o
l
o
g
y
9
_
1
4
_
1
6
\
C
V
A
G
A
T
P
P
a
l
m
S
p
r
i
n
g
s
C
e
n
t
e
r
n
o
I
D
U
p
d
a
t
e
.
m
x
d
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG
¯0 21Miles
*#
*#
*#
*#
*#
*#
*#
*#
*#
*#
*#
*#
*#
*#
*#
*#*#
*#
*#
*#
*#
*#
*#
*#
*#
*#
*#
*#
INDIA
NCANYON
DR
ALEJO RD
PA
L
M
C
A
N
Y
O
N
DR
BE
L
A
R
D
O
R
D
TAHQUITZ
CANYONWAY
PA
T
E
N
C
I
O
R
D
VINE
A
V
E
CHINO DR
ARENAS RD
BARISTO RD
RAMON RD
MU
S
E
U
M
D
R
BE
L
A
R
D
O
R
D
AMADO RD
BARISTO
RD
AV
E
N
I
D
A
C
A
B
A
L
L
E
R
O
S
CA
L
L
E
E
L
S
E
G
U
N
D
O
CA
L
L
E
E
N
C
I
L
I
A
CA
H
U
I
L
L
A
R
D
""16 ""16
""16
""10
""17 ""17
""8
""10
""6
""17
""8
""9
""8
""11
""8
""17
""10
""8
""22
""9
!!16
!!16 !!12!!16
!!17
!!17
!!12
!!12
!!12
!!16
!!16
!!12
!!16
!!6!!16
""10
""8
!!12
!!17
!!13
!!6
!!12
!!13
!!17!!17
AÙ
m mSee City of Palm Springs - North
m mSee City of Palm Springs - South CVAG ATP City of Palm SpringsLocal Network
Figure 4-27b
"#= Proposed Index
"8"7
"2
"6
"9
"10
"11
"12
"13
"14
"16
"17
"18
"19
"20
"3
"1
"4
Bike pathBike/NEV path
Multipurpose path Multipurpose NEV path
Bike laneBike/NEV lane
Buffered bike lane
Buffered bike/NEV laneColored bike lane
Colored bike/NEV laneColored buffered bike lane
Colored buffered bike/NEV lane
Double colored buffered bike laneBike route
Greenback sharrowsBike path (partial)
Bike lanes (partial)Golf path
"21
"22Golf laneN/A
Proposed Bicycle Facilities Existing Bicycle Facilities
Bike pathMultipurpose pathSidewalk path
Bike laneBuffered bike lane
Bike route
Greenback sharrows
Bike path (partial)
(!#= Existing Index
(!1
(!3
(!6
(!8
(!5
(!16
(!17
(!18
Colored buffered bike lane
Colored buffered bike lane/NEV lane(!12
(!13
Bike lanes (partial)
Golf path(!19
(!20
Proposed Transit Bike Parking
Bike Parking
*#Proposed
*#ExistingBike Amenities
*#Proposed
#Existing
*#Bike Locker
##Bike Rack
AÙ
4/1
7
/
2
0
1
7
J
N
M
:
\
M
d
a
t
a
\
1
4
4
8
3
7
\
G
I
S
\
M
X
D
\
A
c
t
i
v
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
\
A
T
P
C
i
t
y
M
a
p
s
\
L
o
c
a
l
M
X
D
s
F
i
n
a
l
\
L
o
c
a
l
M
a
p
s
N
o
I
D
N
e
w
S
y
m
b
o
l
o
g
y
9
_
1
4
_
1
6
\
C
V
A
G
A
T
P
P
a
l
m
S
p
r
i
n
g
s
S
o
u
t
h
n
o
I
D
U
p
d
a
t
e
.
m
x
d
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG
¯0 21Miles
m mSee City of Palm Springs - Center
CVAG ATP City of Palm SpringsLocal Network
Figure 4-27c
"#= Proposed Index
"8"7
"2
"6
"9
"10
"11
"12
"13
"14
"16
"17
"18
"19
"20
"3
"1
"4
Bike pathBike/NEV path
Multipurpose path Multipurpose NEV path
Bike laneBike/NEV lane
Buffered bike lane
Buffered bike/NEV laneColored bike lane
Colored bike/NEV laneColored buffered bike lane
Colored buffered bike/NEV lane
Double colored buffered bike laneBike route
Greenback sharrowsBike path (partial)
Bike lanes (partial)Golf path
"21
"22Golf lane
N/A
Proposed Bicycle Facilities Existing Bicycle Facilities
Bike pathMultipurpose path
Sidewalk path
Bike lane
Buffered bike lane
Bike route
Greenback sharrows
Bike path (partial)
(!#= Existing Index
(!1
(!3
(!6
(!8
(!5
(!16
(!17
(!18
Colored buffered bike laneColored buffered bike lane/NEV lane(!12
(!13
Bike lanes (partial)
Golf path(!19
(!20
Proposed Transit Bike Parking
Bike Parking
*#Proposed
*#ExistingBike Amenities
*#Proposed
#Existing
*#Bike Locker
##Bike Rack
!"`$
CVAG ATP Facilities Identifier
City of Palm Springs - North
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG
¯0 21
Miles
RACQUET CLUB RD
VISTA CHINO
FRANCIS DR
JOYCEDR
VIA ESCUELA
PS88
PS185
PS206
PS242
m mSee City of Palm Springs - CenterSee CVAG ATP Chapter 4
Table for Facility ID Reference
Proposed Bicycle Facilities
Existing Bicycle Facilities
!!
City of Palm Springs - North
Local Network with ATP IDs
Figure 4-27d
PS114
PS115
PS218
PS78
PS187
PS226
PS149
PS80PS77 PS82
PS191B
PS131
PS231
CVAG ATP Facilities Identifier
City of Palm Springs - Center
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG
¯0 21
Miles
!
!
! !!!
!
!!!!
! !!!
!
!
!
!!
!
!!
!
!
!
!!
! !!
! !
! !!!! !!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
ALEJO RD
PS106
PS113PS198
PS78
PS187
PS177 PS157 PS241
PS226
PS79
PS91A
PS80PS77
PS82
m mSee City of Palm Springs - North
m mSee City of Palm Springs - SouthSee CVAG ATP Chapter 4
Table for Facility ID Reference
Proposed Bicycle Facilities
Existing Bicycle Facilities
!!
City of Palm Springs - Center
Local Network with ATP IDs
Figure 4-27e
CVAG ATP Facilities Identifier
City of Palm Springs - South
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG
¯0 21
Miles
m mSee City of Palm Springs - Center
See CVAG ATP Chapter 4
Table for Facility ID Reference
Proposed Bicycle Facilities
Existing Bicycle Facilities
!!
City of Palm Springs - South
Local Network with ATP IDs
Figure 4-27f
Page 4-119
Bicycle Parking
Existing
The City of Palm Springs has identified several locations where
bicycle parking facilities exist. They are listed in Table 4-28.
Table 4-28. Bicycle Parking Facility Locations in Palm Springs
Location Address
Cheeky’s 622 N Palm Canyon Dr
James O. Jesse Center 480 W Tramview Rd
Wellwood Murray Library 100 S Palm Canyon Dr
101 S Palm Canyon Dr
119 N Palm Canyon Dr
1345 N Palm Canyon Dr
140 S Palm Canyon Dr
1414 N Palm Canyon Dr
1414 N Palm Canyon Dr
Hacienda 1555 S Palm Canyon Dr
158 Tahquitz Canyon Way
1584 S Palm Canyon Dr
1695 N Sunrise Way
Stater Brothers 1717 E Vista Chino
Kaiser Grill 205 S Palm Canyon Dr
235 S Palm Canyon Dr
245 S Palm Canyon Dr
2465 E Palm Canyon Dr
256 S Palm Canyon Dr
268 N Palm Canyon Dr
Convention Center 277 N Avenida Caballeros
285 S Palm Canyon Dr
James O Jesse Center 480 W Tramview Rd
500 S Palm Canyon Dr
515 N Palm Canyon Dr
Nature's 555 S Sunrise Way
707 N Palm Canyon Dr
810 N Farrell Dr
Sunrise Park
Demuth Park
Ruth Hardy Park
Location Address
Sunrise Marketplace Shopping Center
Smoke Tree Village Center Shopping Center
City Hall and other City buildings
Desert Hospital
Leisure Center
Police Department
Palm Springs Mall
Riverside County Administrative Center
Palm Springs International Airport
Main Branch Library
Amado Park
Desert Inn Fashion Plaza Mall
Starbucks Café
Plaza Parking Lot
Department of Motor Vehicles
Lower Tram Station
Office building on the southeast corner of
Ramon Road and Paseo Dorotea
Proposed
The City proposed to add new bicycle parking to the locations
listed in Table 4-29.
Table 4-29. Proposed Locations for New Bicycle Parking in
Palm Springs
Location Address
Azul 369 N Palm Canyon Dr
Antique Gallery Palm Springs 505 E Industrial Place
Shops at Palm Springs Marketplace 1717 E Vista Chino, #B
Plaza Investment Company 194 S Indian Canyon
John Wessman 555 S Sunrise Way, #301
Rim Rock Plaza 4711 B Unit Sunny Dunes
Plaza Racquet Club 1300 E Baristo
Kerson Gallery 2699 N Palm Canyon Dr
David Bell Enterprises 370 W San Rafael
The City currently has no requirements or plans for bicycle parking
in new buildings.
Page 4-120
Links to Other Transportation Modes
Palm Springs is served by SunLine Transit, which has bicycle racks
on every bus in its fleet. These state-of-the-art bike racks can carry
up to two bicycles per bus and are very convenient to use for the
bicyclist. An Amtrak station is located near Indian Canyon Drive in
the northern part of the city, and a Greyhound bus station is
located near the downtown area. Bicycle parking is planned at both
locations.
Bike racks and/or bike lockers are proposed by SunLine Transit at
selected bus stop locations in the city. These locations are listed in
Table 4-30.
Bicycle Amenities
Shower and clothing lockers exist at Sunrise Park. The new College
of the Desert campus will have bicycle amenities. The City
currently has no requirements for bicycle amenities in new
buildings.
Bicycle Safety Education and Police Enforcement
Palm Springs has not had a bicycle safety education program.
However, the Coachella Valley Association of Governments,
partnering with the Riverside County Department of Public Health
and the Palm Springs Unified School District, has won a federal
Safe Routes to School grant to provide bicycle and pedestrian
safety education at public schools in Palm Springs. The program
started in federal Fiscal Year 2010–2011.
Table 4-30. Proposed Bus Stop Locations for Bike Racks and/or Bike Lockers in Palm Springs
Line(s) Street Cross Street Stop # Direction Position* Facility Type
111 E Palm Canyon Dr Gene Autry Trail 15 EB FS Bike rack
24 Tahquitz Canyon Way Civic Dr 29 WB FS Bike rack
14/30/111 Palm Canyon Dr Baristo Rd 128 SB FS Bike locker
14 Gene Autry Trail E Vista Chino 490 SB NS Bike locker
24 Avenida Caballeros Vista Chino 496 NB FS Bike rack
24 Vista Chino Avenida Caballeros 609 EB FS Bike rack
14 Gene Autry Trail Vista Chino 614 NB FS Bike locker
111 Palm Canyon Dr Gene Autry Trail 667 WB FS Bike rack
14/30/24 Baristo Rd Farrell Dr 780 WB MB Bike locker
14/24/30 Baristo Rd Farrell Dr 889 EB NS Bike locker
* Position refers to the near side (NS) or far side (FS) of the intersection
Page 4-121
Wayfinding Signage
The City will seek funds for a citywide bikeway wayfinding signage
program. The wayfinding signage will connect with CV Link and
with downtown.
Past Expenditures for Bicycle Facilities
Palm Springs had one project funded with SB 821 funds in 1996.
This project was for a bike lane and signage project for all city
bikeways in the amount of $79,000. In the early 1990s, Palm
Springs received $383,000 from Measure A and SB 821 funds for a
bicycle bridge over Palm Canyon Wash.
Palm Springs also received a $140,000 MSRC grant for parking,
education, outreach, maps and signage.
Maintenance Policies
The City of Palm Springs maintains bike paths as part of the streets
on an as-needed basis. Bike paths are maintained by the Parks and
Recreation Department.
Other Related Policies
The City of Palm Springs has a Safe Routes to School (SRTS) Plan.
Coordination with Neighboring Jurisdictions
Since this Plan covers the entire Coachella and Palo Verde Valleys,
the plans of neighboring cities and the unincorporated county were
coordinated to ensure links.
Future Financial Needs
The City of Palm Springs has the following future financial needs:
Total proposed bikeways 172.6 miles
Total proposed bikeways cost $23,763,213
Bicycle parking program $75,000
Wayfinding signage $832,000
Total capital financial need $24,670,213
Annual Class I bike path maintenance budget
5.5 miles, $55,000/year
Safe Routes to School Program $50,000/year
Grant Reporting Policies
The City of Palm Springs follows specific reporting guidelines for
each grant it receives.
Page 4-122
This page intentionally left blank
CITY OF R ANCHO MIRAGE
This page intentionally left blank
Page 4-123
CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE
BICYCLE PLAN
With a year 2015 population of 17,889 per the California
Department of Finance, Rancho Mirage is made up of primarily
resort communities. The city has a grid network of arterial streets
that connect to the neighboring cities of Cathedral City and Palm
Desert, as well as to surrounding unincorporated areas. The city’s
main arterial streets include State Route 111, Da Vall and Bob
Hope Drives, Monterey Avenue, Ramon Road, and Dinah Shore,
Gerald Ford, Frank Sinatra, and Country Club Drives. Most of the
city’s destinations are located along SR 111.
Land Use
Figure 4-28 shows the current and future land use patterns in
Rancho Mirage. The city consists primarily of low- and very low-
density residential and resort uses. Commercial office and retail
uses are located along SR 111. Golf communities are located
throughout the city.
AÙ
!"`$
!"`$
AÙ
2/1
6
/
2
0
1
6
J
N
M
:
\
M
d
a
t
a
\
1
4
4
8
3
7
\
G
I
S
\
M
X
D
\
A
c
t
i
v
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
\
L
a
n
d
U
s
e
\
C
V
A
G
R
a
n
c
h
o
M
i
r
a
g
e
L
a
n
d
U
s
e
.
m
x
d
CVAG ATP - Land UseCity of Rancho Mirage
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG
City Limits
Rancho MirageLand UseSingle Family Residential
Multi-Family Residential
Mobile Homes and Trailer ParksGeneral Office
Commercial and Services
FacilitiesEducation
Transportation, Communications, and Utilities
Mixed Residential and CommercialOpen Space and Recreation
Union Pacific Railroad¯0 21Miles
AÙ
!"`$
!"`$
AÙ
5/2
0
/
2
0
1
6
J
N
M
:
\
M
d
a
t
a
\
1
4
4
8
3
7
\
G
I
S
\
M
X
D
\
A
c
t
i
v
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
\
C
r
a
s
h
M
a
p
s
f
r
o
m
B
r
i
a
n
\
C
V
A
G
A
T
P
R
a
n
c
h
o
M
i
r
a
g
e
C
r
a
s
h
B
a
s
i
c
A
T
P
.
m
x
d
CVAG ATP City of Rancho MirageCrash Map
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG, SWITRS Figure 4-29
¯0 21Miles
SWITRS database does not provide coordinate data for 1 pedestriancrash and 1 bicycle crash, therefore that data is not represented on this map.
YX Pedestrian Fatality
""Bicycle Fatality XX Pedestrian Injury
""Bicycle Injury Proposed Bicycle FacilitiesExisting Bicycle FacilitiesUnion Pacific Railroad
Page 4-126
Bikeways
Existing
Rancho Mirage currently has several existing bikeways, totaling
21.1 miles in length, as listed in Table 4-31.
Proposed
The City has proposed the bikeway projects listed in Table 4-32 to
be included in this Plan. Project costs are based on past
expenditures for bikeways throughout California and from
feedback received from local jurisdictions. Costs for individual
projects will vary by location and complexity.
Figure 4-30 shows existing and proposed bikeways, bicycle parking,
and amenities.
Table 4-31. City of Rancho Mirage Existing Bikeways
ID # Street/Path From To Class
Regionally
Significant?
Length
(mi.)
RM101E Bob Hope Dr Ramon Rd Hwy 111 Bike lanes (partial) Yes 5.5
RM102E Bob Hope Dr Dinah Shore Dr Gerald Ford Dr Bike path Yes 1.0
RM103E Bob Hope Dr Frank Sinatra Dr Hwy 111 Bike path Yes 2.4
RM104E Country Club Dr Hwy 111 Monterey Ave Bike lanes (partial) Yes 2.6
RM105E Country Club Dr Hwy 111 Whitewater River Bike path Yes 0.4
RM106E Country Club Dr Whitewater River Monterey Ave Bike path Yes 2.2
RM107E Da Vall Dr 30th Ave Frank Sinatra Dr Bike path Yes 4.0
RM108E DaVall Dr 30th Ave Frank Sinatra Dr Bike lanes (partial) Yes 4.0
RM109E Dinah Shore Dr Plumley Rd Monterey Ave Bike lanes (partial) Yes 3.6
RM110E Dinah Shore Dr Plumely Rd Monterey AVe Bike path Yes 3.6
RM111E Frank Sinatra Dr Hwy 111 Monterey Ave Bike lanes (partial) Yes 3.3
RM112E Frank Sinatra Dr Hwy 111 Whitewater River Bike path Yes 0.3
RM113E Frank Sinatra Dr Da Vall Dr Monterey Ave Bike path Yes 3.0
RM114E Gerald Ford Dr Plumley Rd Monterey Ave Bike lanes (partial) Yes 3.5
RM115E Gerald Ford Dr Plumley Rd Monterey Ave Bike path Yes 3.5
RM116E Hwy 111 North City Limit South City Limit Bike path Yes 4.2
RM117E Los Alamos Dr Ramon Rd Dinah Shore Dr Bike path No 1.0
RM118E Monterey Ave Dinah Shore Dr Country Club Dr Bike lanes Yes 3.1
RM119E Monterey Ave Dinah Shore Dr Frank Sinatra Dr Bike path (partial) Yes 2.1
RM120E Monterey Ave Frank Sinatra Dr Verbania Rd Bike path Yes 1.5
RM121E Morningside Dr Country Club Dr Frank Sinatra Dr Bike lanes No 1.0
RM122E Parkview Dr Hwy 111 East City Limit Bike lanes Yes 0.6
RM123E Parkview Dr Hwy 111 East City Limit Bike path (partial) Yes 0.6
RM124E Plumley Rd Dinah Shore Dr Converse Rd Bike path No 0.8
RM125E Ramon Rd Da Vall Dr Los Alamos Dr Bike lanes (partial) Yes 1.0
RM126E Ramon Rd Da Vall Dr Los Alamos Bike path Yes 1.0
Table 4-31, continued
Page 4-127
ID # Street/Path From To Class
Regionally
Significant?
Length
(mi.)
RM127E Rattler Rd Street s/o Rancho Mirage High
School
Ramon Rd Bike path No 0.3
RM128E Vista Dunes Rd Frank Sinatra Dr Country Club Dr Bike lanes No 1.0
RM129E Whitewater River (Butler-Abrams
Trail)
Frank Sinatra Dr Country Club Dr Bike path Yes 1.3
Page 4-128
Table 4-32. City of Rancho Mirage Proposed Bikeway Projects
ID # Street/Path From To Class
Regionally
Significant?
Length
(mi.)
Estimated
Cost
RM130 Bob Hope Dr Ramon Rd Hwy 111 Bike lanes (partial)** Yes 5.5 $219,644
RM131 Bob Hope Dr Gerald Ford Dr Frank Sinatra Dr Bike path Yes 1.0 $1,090,941
RM132 Bob Hope Dr Country Club Dr Torremolinos Dr Bike route Yes 1.2 $44,078
RM133 Country Club Dr Hwy 111 Monterey Ave Bike lanes (partial)** Yes 2.6 $101,242
RM134 DaVall Dr 30th Ave Frank Sinatra Dr Bike lanes (partial)** Yes 4.0 $158,404
RM135 Dinah Shore Dr Plumley Rd Monterey Ave Bike lanes (partial)** Yes 3.6 $141,534
RM136 Frank Sinatra Dr Hwy 111 Monterey Ave Bike lanes (partial)** Yes 3.3 $128,806
RM137 Gerald Ford Dr Plumley Rd Monterey Ave Bike lanes (partial)** Yes 3.5 $139,633
RM138 Joshua Rd Magnesia Falls Dr End of Joshua Rd Bike route Yes 0.5 $18,176
RM139 La Paz Rd Thompson Rd Los Reyes Dr Bike route No 0.3 $11,408
RM140 Los Alamos Dr Ramon Rd Dinah Shore Dr Bike lanes No 1.0 $79,568
RM141 Los Alamos Rd RR ROW Ramon Rd Bike lanes No 0.7 $52,294
RM142 Los Alamos Rd Gerald Ford Dr Sunny Ln Bike route No 0.4 $13,998
RM143 Los Reyes Dr Sunny Ln La Paz Rd Bike route No 0.4 $14,102
RM144 Magnesia Falls Dr Gardess Rd Joshua Rd Bike route Yes 1.0 $36,661
RM145 Monterey Ave Dinah Shore Dr Frank Sinatra Dr Bike path (partial)** Yes 2.1 $1,209,828
RM146 Monterey Ave Verbenia Rd Clancy Ln Bike path Yes 0.3 $267,723
RM147 Railroad Alignment West City Limit East City Limit Bike path No 1.9 $1,989,776
RM148 Ramon Rd Da Vall Dr Los Alamos Dr Bike lanes (partial)** Yes 1.0 $39,628
RM149 Rattler Rd North City Limit Street s/o Rancho Mirage High
School
Bike path No 0.2 $264,557
RM150 Sunny Ln Da Vall Dr Los Reyes Bike route No 1.0 $36,970
RM151 Thompson Rd La Paz Rd Frank Sinatra Dr Bike route No 0.2 $9,212
RM152 Parkview Dr Hwy 111 East City Limit Bike path (partial)** Yes 0.6 $328,774
WSRM Wayfinding Signage $144,000
BPRM Bicycle Parking Program $25,000
TOTAL $6,565,955
**Bike facilities will not exist on both sides of the road for the complete section under the proposed condition.
AÙ
!"`$
!"`$
AÙ
UNION
P
A
C
I
F
I
C
R
R
4/1
7
/
2
0
1
7
J
N
M
:
\
M
d
a
t
a
\
1
4
4
8
3
7
\
G
I
S
\
M
X
D
\
A
c
t
i
v
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
\
A
T
P
C
i
t
y
M
a
p
s
\
L
o
c
a
l
M
X
D
s
F
i
n
a
l
\
L
o
c
a
l
M
a
p
s
N
o
I
D
N
e
w
S
y
m
b
o
l
o
g
y
9
_
1
4
_
1
6
\
C
V
A
G
A
T
P
R
a
n
c
h
o
M
i
r
a
g
e
n
o
I
D
U
p
d
a
t
e
.
m
x
d
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG
¯0 21Miles
CVAG ATP City of Rancho MirageLocal Network
Figure 4-30
"#= Proposed Index
"8"7
"2
"6
"9
"10
"11
"12
"13
"14
"16
"17
"18
"19
"20
"3
"1
"4
Bike path
Bike/NEV path
Multipurpose path
Multipurpose NEV path
Bike laneBike/NEV lane
Buffered bike lane
Buffered bike/NEV lane
Colored bike lane
Colored bike/NEV laneColored buffered bike lane
Colored buffered bike/NEV laneDouble colored buffered bike lane
Bike route
Greenback sharrowsBike path (partial)
Bike lanes (partial)Golf path
"21
"22Golf lane
N/A
Proposed Bicycle Facilities Existing Bicycle Facilities
Bike pathMultipurpose path
Sidewalk pathBike lane
Buffered bike lane
Bike route
Greenback sharrows
Bike path (partial)
(!#= Existing Index
(!1
(!3
(!6
(!8
(!5
(!16
(!17
(!18
Colored buffered bike laneColored buffered bike lane/NEV lane(!12
(!13
Bike lanes (partial)
Golf path(!19
(!20
Proposed Transit Bike Parking
Bike Parking
*#Proposed
*#ExistingBike Amenities
*#Proposed
#Existing
*#Bike Locker
##Bike Rack
CVAG ATP Facilities Identifier
City of Rancho Mirage
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG
¯0 21
Miles
See CVAG ATP Chapter 4
Table for Facility ID Reference
Proposed Bicycle Facilities
Existing Bicycle Facilities
!!
City of Rancho Mirage
Local Network with ATP IDs
Figure 4-30a
Page 4-131
Bicycle Parking
Existing
The City of Rancho Mirage has bicycle parking at the following
locations:
City Hall
The River shopping center
The library
Eisenhower Medical Center
Albertson’s at the southwest corner of Country Club Drive
and Monterey Avenue
Whitewater Park
Monterey Market Place
Pavilions shopping center at the southwest corner of
Gerald Ford Drive and Bob Hope Drive
At the activity center at the southwest corner of Dinah
Shore Drive and Monterey Avenue
Proposed
New bicycle parking will be added by the property owners at the
intersection of Dinah Shore Drive and Bob Hope Drive and at the
casino at the intersection of Ramon Road and Bob Hope Drive.
The City also requires bicycle parking by ordinance in new office
and commercial developments. One bicycle rack is required for
every 40 auto parking spaces.
Links to Other Transportation Modes
The City is served by SunLine Transit, which has bicycle racks on
every bus in its fleet. The older SunLine bus racks hold two
bicycles, but the new state-of-the-art racks will hold three bicycles
per bus and are very convenient to use for the bicyclist. No transit
stations or park-and-ride facilities currently exist in the city, nor are
any planned.
Bike racks and/or bike lockers are proposed by SunLine Transit at
selected bus stop locations in the city, as listed in Table 4-33.
Table 4-33. Proposed Bus Stop Locations for Bike Racks and/or
Bike Lockers in Rancho Mirage
Line(s) Street Cross Street Stop # Direction Position* Facility
Type
53 Bob
Hope Dr Hospital 582 NB FS Bike
rack
111 SR 111 Mirage
Cove Dr 643 EB FS Bike
rack
111 SR 111 Rancho Las
Palmas 650 EB NS Bike
rack
111 SR 111 Rancho Las
Palmas 659 WB NS Bike
rack
111 SR 111 Mirage
Cove Dr 663 WB FS Bike
rack
32 Dinah
Shore Dr
Shoppers
Lane 939 EB FS Bike
rack
* Position refers to the near side (NS) or far side (FS) of the intersection
Bicycle Amenities
Rancho Mirage has no bicycle commuter–related showers or
clothing lockers. The City currently has no requirements for bicycle
amenities.
Bicycle Safety Education and Police Enforcement
There are no bicycle safety education or special police enforcement
programs in Rancho Mirage.
Wayfinding Signage
The City has no plans for wayfinding signage.
Page 4-132
Past Expenditures for Bicycle Facilities
All previous bikeways have been funded by the City’s General
Fund or from development impact fees. The City does not keep
direct records of expenditures.
Maintenance Policies
The City of Rancho Mirage does an annual inspection of all
roadways and makes repairs as needed. The City also inspects
properties fronting the roadways and sends requests to property
owners for repairs.
Class II (bike lanes) bikeways are maintained under the pavement
management plan. The City conducts surveys once every five years
to determine what maintenance needs to be done.
Inventory is conducted to check for sign replacement and
restriping. The City maintained an average of 80 on the Pavement
Condition Index.
Other Related Policies
The City of Rancho Mirage has a Safe Routes to School (SRTS)
Plan. Both schools in the city have had improvements completed.
Coordination with Neighboring Jurisdictions
Since this Plan covers the entire Coachella and Palo Verde Valleys,
the plans of neighboring cities and the unincorporated county were
coordinated to ensure links.
Future Financial Needs
The City of Rancho Mirage has the following future financial
needs:
Total proposed bikeways 36.1 miles
Total proposed bikeways cost $6,396,955
Bicycle parking program $25,000
Wayfinding signage $144,000
Total capital financial need $6,565,955
Annual Class I bike path maintenance budget
3.4 miles, $34,000/year
Safe Routes to School Program $50,000/year
Grant Reporting Policies
The City of Rancho Mirage follows specific reporting guidelines for
each grant it receives.
U NINCORPORATED
RI V ERSIDE COUNTY
This page intentionally left blank
Page 4-133
UNINCORPORATED RIVERSIDE
COUNTY BICYCLE PLAN
For the purposes of this Active Transportation Plan, areas of the
Coachella and Palo Verde Valleys that fall outside existing city
boundaries are referred to as unincorporated Riverside County. In
the Coachella Valley, this area is bounded by the Little San
Bernardino Mountains and Joshua Tree National Park to the north,
the Santa Rosa Mountains to the south, Verbenia Avenue to the
west, and the hills just east of Indio and Coachella. Some of the
main arterials in this area include State Routes 62, 111, and 86,
Dillon Road, Monroe, Van Buren, Fillmore, and Pierce Streets,
Avenues 52, 54, 58, 62, and 66, and Airport Boulevard. According
to the California Department of Finance and the CVAG website,
in 2010 the unincorporated area of Riverside County had a
population of 317,307, with 84,478 residents living within the
CVAG boundary.
The Palo Verde Valley is bounded by the Main Diversion Dam to
the north, the Imperial County line to the south, the Colorado
River to the east, and Palo Verde Mesa to the west. In this area,
some of the main arterial streets include State Route 78 and US
Route 95, Hobsonway, 4th, 6th, 10th, 14th, and 18th Avenues, and
De Frain, Neighbours, Lovekin, Intake, and Olive Lake
Boulevards. Most of the roads in the unincorporated areas are two-
lane rural roads with pavement widths that vary between 24 and 28
feet. Some roads have paved shoulders, but most do not. State
highways, such as State Routes 111, 62, 86, 78, and US Route 95
tend to have widened shoulders.
Land Use
Figures 4-31 and 4-32 show the current and future land use
patterns in the unincorporated areas of the Coachella and Palo
Verde Valleys. Most of the unincorporated areas have existing
agricultural or open space land uses. Several small urbanized areas
include some commercial, industrial, and residential uses. Some of
these small locations are labeled on the map and include Thousand
Palms, Bermuda Dunes, Thermal, Mecca, North Shore, Ripley, and
Mesa Verde. A large area of medium- and low-density residential
land uses is located in North Palm Springs and Sky Valley. Some
commercial uses are located along SR 111 south of Thermal, and
industrial uses are located in North Palm Springs, north of Rancho
Mirage, and near Thermal. The checkerboard pattern of land use
and zoning corresponds with the pattern of Indian reservation land
in the western part of the Coachella Valley. Indian land is zoned
for low-density residential, and the alternating mile squares are
zoned for agricultural or open space uses.
A¡
!"`$
!"`$
!"`$
4/1
5
/
2
0
1
6
J
N
M
:
\
M
d
a
t
a
\
1
4
4
8
3
7
\
G
I
S
\
M
X
D
\
A
c
t
i
v
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
\
L
a
n
d
U
s
e
\
C
V
A
G
A
T
P
R
i
v
e
r
s
i
d
e
C
o
u
n
t
y
N
o
r
t
h
L
a
n
d
U
s
e
.
m
x
d
CVAG ATP - LAND USECounty of Riverside - North
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG
¯0 21Miles
AÙ
City Limits
County of RiversideLand UseSingle Family ResidentialMulti-Family Residential
Mixed Residential
Commercial and ServicesFacilities
Industrial
Open Space and Recreation
Water
Undevelopable or Protected LandUnion Pacific Railroad
m mSee County of Riverside - Northeast
AÌ
!"`$
!"`$
!"`$
AÌ
AÌ
4/1
5
/
2
0
1
6
J
N
M
:
\
M
d
a
t
a
\
1
4
4
8
3
7
\
G
I
S
\
M
X
D
\
A
c
t
i
v
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
\
L
a
n
d
U
s
e
\
C
V
A
G
A
T
P
R
i
v
e
r
s
i
d
e
C
o
u
n
t
y
N
o
r
t
h
E
a
s
t
L
a
n
d
U
s
e
.
m
x
d
CVAG ATP - LAND USECounty of Riverside - Northeast
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG
¯0 21Miles
City LimitsCounty of RiversideLand Use
Single Family Residential
Multi-Family ResidentialMixed Residential
General OfficeCommercial and ServicesFacilities
Industrial
Mixed Residential and Commercial
Open Space and Recreation
WaterUndevelopable or Protected Land
Union Pacific Railroad
m mSee County of Riverside - Center
m mSee County of Riverside - North
!"`$
!"`$
A¿AÙ
A¿
AÙ
AÙ
4/1
5
/
2
0
1
6
J
N
M
:
\
M
d
a
t
a
\
1
4
4
8
3
7
\
G
I
S
\
M
X
D
\
A
c
t
i
v
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
\
L
a
n
d
U
s
e
\
C
V
A
G
A
T
P
R
i
v
e
r
s
i
d
e
C
o
u
n
t
y
C
e
n
t
e
r
L
a
n
d
U
s
e
.
m
x
d
CVAG ATP - LAND USECounty of Riverside - Center
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG
¯0 21Miles
City LimitsCounty of RiversideLand Use
Single Family Residential
Multi-Family ResidentialMixed Residential
General Office
Commercial and ServicesFacilities
Industrial
Mixed Residential and CommercialOpen Space and Recreation
AgricultureWater
Undevelopable or Protected Land
Union Pacific Railroad
m mSee County of Riverside - North
m mSee County of Riverside - South
4/1
5
/
2
0
1
6
J
N
M
:
\
M
d
a
t
a
\
1
4
4
8
3
7
\
G
I
S
\
M
X
D
\
A
c
t
i
v
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
\
L
a
n
d
U
s
e
\
C
V
A
G
A
T
P
R
i
v
e
r
s
i
d
e
C
o
u
n
t
y
S
o
u
t
h
L
a
n
d
U
s
e
.
m
x
d
CVAG ATP - LAND USECounty of Riverside - South
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG
¯0 21Miles
SALTON SEA
A¿AÙ
City LimitsCounty of RiversideLand Use
Single Family Residential
Multi-Family ResidentialMixed Residential
Commercial and ServicesFacilitiesIndustrial
Mixed Residential and Commercial
Open Space and Recreation
Agriculture
WaterUndevelopable or Protected Land
Union Pacific Railroad
m mSee County of Riverside - Center
Color
a
d
o
Riv
e
r
LO
V
E
K
I
N
BL
V
D
20THAVE
BR
O
A
D
W
A
Y
S
HOBSON WAY
10TH AVE
SEELEY AVE
14TH AVE
DEFRAIN
BLVD
INTAKE
BLVD
AR
R
O
W
H
E
A
D
BL
V
D 18THAVE
RIVERSIDEAVE
6THAVE
DST15TH AVE
ST
E
P
H
E
N
S
O
N
BL
V
D
MIDLANDRD
5THAVE
4THAVE
8THAVE
2NDAVE
ME
G
I
N
AV
E
7THAVEDA
V
E
S
T
BU
C
K
BL
V
D
9THAVE
ODENWAY
3RDAVE
KE
I
M
B
L
V
D
11THAVE
CVAG ATP - Land UseCounty of Riverside - East
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG
¯0 21Miles
!"`$
IÄ
A¸
City LimitsCounty of RiversideLand UseSingle Family ResidentialMixed Residential
Commercial and Services
FacilitiesIndustrial
Open Space and Recreation
AgricultureUndevelopable or Protected Land
ARZC Railroad
A¡
!"`$
!"`$
!"`$
5/2
0
/
2
0
1
6
J
N
M
:
\
M
d
a
t
a
\
1
4
4
8
3
7
\
G
I
S
\
M
X
D
\
A
c
t
i
v
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
\
C
r
a
s
h
M
a
p
s
f
r
o
m
B
r
i
a
n
\
C
V
A
G
A
T
P
R
i
v
e
r
s
i
d
e
C
o
u
n
t
y
N
o
r
t
h
C
r
a
s
h
B
a
s
i
c
A
T
P
.
m
x
d
CVAG ATP Unincorporated Riverside CountyCrash Map
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG Figure 4-33a
¯0 21Miles
AÙ
m mSee County of Riverside - Northeast
SWITRS database does not provide coordinate data for X pedestriancrashes and Y bicycle crashes, therefore that data is not represented on this map
YX Pedestrian Fatality
""Bicycle Fatality XX Pedestrian Injury
""Bicycle Injury Proposed Bicycle FacilitiesExisting Bicycle FacilitiesUnion Pacific Railroad
AÌ
!"`$
!"`$
!"`$
AÌ
AÌ
5/2
0
/
2
0
1
6
J
N
M
:
\
M
d
a
t
a
\
1
4
4
8
3
7
\
G
I
S
\
M
X
D
\
A
c
t
i
v
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
\
C
r
a
s
h
M
a
p
s
f
r
o
m
B
r
i
a
n
\
C
V
A
G
A
T
P
R
i
v
e
r
s
i
d
e
C
o
u
n
t
y
N
o
r
t
h
E
a
s
t
C
r
a
s
h
B
a
s
i
c
A
T
P
.
m
x
d
CVAG ATP Unincorporated Riverside CountyCrash Map
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG, SWITRS Figure 4-33b
¯0 21Miles
m mSee County of Riverside - Center
m mSee County of Riverside - North
YX Pedestrian Fatality
""Bicycle Fatality XX Pedestrian Injury
""Bicycle Injury Proposed Bicycle FacilitiesExisting Bicycle FacilitiesUnion Pacific Railroad
!"`$
!"`$
A¿AÙ
A¿
AÙ
AÙ
5/2
0
/
2
0
1
6
J
N
M
:
\
M
d
a
t
a
\
1
4
4
8
3
7
\
G
I
S
\
M
X
D
\
A
c
t
i
v
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
\
C
r
a
s
h
M
a
p
s
f
r
o
m
B
r
i
a
n
\
C
V
A
G
A
T
P
R
i
v
e
r
s
i
d
e
C
o
u
n
t
y
C
e
n
t
e
r
C
r
a
s
h
B
a
s
i
c
A
T
P
.
m
x
d
CVAG ATP Unincorporated Riverside CountyCrash Map
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG, SWITRS Figure 4-33c
¯0 21Miles
YX Pedestrian Fatality
""Bicycle Fatality XX Pedestrian Injury
""Bicycle Injury Proposed Bicycle FacilitiesExisting Bicycle FacilitiesUnion Pacific Railroad
m mSee County of Riverside - Northeast
m mSee County of Riverside - South
XW
XW
XW
")
")
")
WhitewaterRiver
CoachellaCanal
66TH AVE
62ND AVE
PI
E
R
C
E
S
T
VA
N
B
U
R
E
N
S
T
CA
L
H
O
U
N
S
T
60TH AVE
HA
R
R
I
S
O
N
S
T
61ST AVE
64TH AVE
63RD AVE
LIN
C
O
L
N
S
T
65TH AVE
JO
H
N
S
O
N
S
T
68TH AVE
GR
A
N
T
S
T
70TH AVEJO
H
N
S
O
N
S
T
LI
N
C
O
L
N
S
T
HA
Y
E
S
S
T
GA
R
F
I
E
L
D
S
T
AR
T
H
U
R
S
T
68TH AVE
DA
L
E
K
I
L
E
R
R
D
65TH AVE
69TH AVE
CL
E
V
E
L
A
N
D
S
T
VA
N
D
E
R
V
E
E
R
R
D
FI
L
L
M
O
R
E
S
T
COAC
H
E
L
L
A
C
A
N
A
L
R
D
PO
L
K
S
T
74TH AVE
HAR
R
I
S
O
N
S
T
81ST AVE
82ST AVE
84ST AVE
JO
H
N
S
O
N
S
T
PARKSIDE DR
SALTON SE
A
T
R
A
I
L
COAC
H
E
L
L
A
C
A
N
A
L
R
D
VA
N
B
U
R
E
N
S
T
PO
L
K
ST
62ND AVE
TY
L
E
R
S
T
HARR
I
S
O
N
S
T
BOX C
A
N
Y
O
N
R
D
BU
C
H
A
N
A
N
S
T
PI
E
R
C
E
S
T
5/2
0
/
2
0
1
6
J
N
M
:
\
M
d
a
t
a
\
1
4
4
8
3
7
\
G
I
S
\
M
X
D
\
A
c
t
i
v
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
\
C
r
a
s
h
M
a
p
s
f
r
o
m
B
r
i
a
n
\
C
V
A
G
A
T
P
R
i
v
e
r
s
i
d
e
C
o
u
n
t
y
S
o
u
t
h
C
r
a
s
h
B
a
s
i
c
A
T
P
.
m
x
d
CVAG ATP Unincorporated Riverside CountyCrash Map
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG, SWITRS Figure 4-33d
¯0 21Miles
SALTON SEA
A¿AÙ
YX Pedestrian Fatality
""Bicycle Fatality XX Pedestrian Injury
""Bicycle Injury Proposed Bicycle FacilitiesExisting Bicycle FacilitiesUnion Pacific Railroad
m mSee County of Riverside - Center
Color
a
d
o
Riv
e
r
LO
V
E
K
I
N
BL
V
D
20THAVE
BR
O
A
D
W
A
Y
S
HOBSON WAY
10TH AVE
SEELEY AVE
14TH AVE
DEFRAIN
BLVD
INTAKE
BLVD
AR
R
O
W
H
E
A
D
BL
V
D 18THAVE
RIVERSIDEAVE
6THAVE
DST15TH AVE
ST
E
P
H
E
N
S
O
N
BL
V
D
MIDLANDRD
5THAVE
4THAVE
8THAVE
2NDAVE
ME
G
I
N
AV
E
7THAVEDA
V
E
S
T
BU
C
K
BL
V
D
9THAVE
ODENWAY
3RDAVE
KE
I
M
B
L
V
D
11THAVE
CVAG ATP Unincorporated Riverside CountyCrash Map
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG, SWITRS Figure 4-34
¯0 21Miles
!"`$
IÄ
A¸
YX Pedestrian Fatality
""Bicycle Fatality XX Pedestrian Injury
""Bicycle Injury Proposed Bicycle FacilitiesExisting Bicycle FacilitiesARZC Railroad
Page 4-144
Bikeways
Riverside County currently has existing bikeway facilities stretching
over 23.2 miles, as listed in Table 4-34.
The County of Riverside has the proposed bikeway projects
included in Table 4-35.
Figure 4-35 shows existing and proposed bikeways and parking
facilities. Most of the projects are proposed on rural two-lane roads
with pavement widths of 24–28 feet. There are three primary
options for improving these roads and upgrading them to
accommodate bicycle lanes or establishing Class III bike routes.
The options for rural roads are listed below.
Since SR 111 is a high priority project, costs were
calculated to include 8 feet of additional asphalt.
Designate the routes as Class III bike route facilities with
signage, and provide safety signage advising motorists of
the presence of bicyclists on the road. Accelerated
maintenance schedules could also be implemented along
these routes.
Widen the roadway to 36–40 feet either to include wide
shoulders for a Class III bike route or to install Class II
bike lanes.
When the surrounding areas is developed, incorporate bike
lanes or wide shoulders for a Class III bike route facility
into the design of the roadway so that the road is widened
to a sufficient width to accommodate a bicycle facility.
Table 4-34. County of Riverside Existing Bikeways
ID # Street/Path From To Class
Regionally
Significant?
Length
(mi.)
MN05E Monroe St Mountain View Ln. Airport Blvd Bike lanes Yes 0.6
PG03E Palm Dr Desert Hot Springs City Limit (Camino
Aventura)
I-10 Bike lanes Yes 2.1
DHS01E Pierson Blvd Indian Ave / N. Indian Canyon Dr Cholla Dr Bike lanes Yes 1.8
DHS03E Little Morongo Rd Pierson Blvd. 1860 feet south of 20th Ave Bike route Yes 1.8
DHS05E Mission Lakes Blvd Little Morongo Rd Palm Dr Bike route Yes 1.5
DHS08E West Dr Mission Lakes Blvd Ironwood Dr Bike lanes Yes 1.0
LQ21E Monroe St Ave 52 Ave 54 Bike lanes Yes 1.0
LQ22E Monroe St Mountain View Ln. Ave 58 Bike lanes Yes 1.6
PD08E Tamarisk Row Dr Frank Sinatra Dr Country Club Dr Bike Lanes Yes 1.4
RM101E Bob Hope Dr Ramon Rd Hwy 111 Bike lanes (partial) Yes 5.5
RM109E Dinah Shore Dr Plumley Rd Monterey Ave Bike lanes (partial) Yes 3.6
RM110E Dinah Shore Dr Plumely Rd Monterey AVe Bike path Yes 3.6
RM117E Los Alamos Dr Ramon Rd Dinah Shore Dr Bike path No 1.0
RM127E Rattler Rd Street s/o Rancho Mirage High School Ramon Rd Bike path No 0.3
IN01AE Jefferson St Indio Blvd. Ave 50 Bike lanes Yes 4.0
Page 4-145
Table 4-35. County of Riverside Proposed Bikeway Projects
ID # Street/Path From To Class
Regionally
Significant?
Length
(mi.)
Estimated
Cost
IN65C Ave 50 Jefferson St Indio Eastern city limit
(1010 feet east of
Jackson St)
Bike Lanes Yes 1.0 $79,200
IN85 Ave 52 Monroe St Jackson St Bike lanes Yes 1.0 $79,200
ISDCC3 Access Road Along East
Side of Spotlight 29
Casino*
Just south of I-10 Harrison Pl Bike lanes/NEV lanes Yes 1.1 $87,120
RCBCC Bridge Access Across I-
10*
Vista del Norte Unpaved path along
southern side of I-10
Bike lanes/NEV lanes Yes 0.1 $6,000
RCCCC Access Road Along I-
10*
County/City limit Vista del Norte Bike lanes/NEV lanes Yes 0.3 $20,625
RCUCC Unpaved path along
southern side of I-10*
Bridge Access 0.2 mi along path Bike lanes/NEV lanes Yes 0.3 $26,250
RIV90B Ave 62 Buchanan St Coachella Canal Bike path Yes 3.0 $2,952,576
RIV06 Bob Hope Dr Varner Rd Ramon Rd Buffered bike lanes Yes 0.5 $50,160
COA32 Whitewater River Tyler St Airport Blvd Bike path/NEV path Yes 4.0 N/A (CV Link)
RIV09 Whitewater River Eastern Indio city limits
(1340 feet east of Van
Buren St)
Tyler St Bike path/NEV path Yes 3.6 N/A (CV Link)
RIV32 Whitewater River Airport Blvd Salton Sea Bike path/NEV path Yes 11.1 N/A (CV Link)
DHS37 Mission Creek Trailhead at Twenty Nine
Palms Hwy
Pierson Blvd. Multipurpose path/NEV
path
Yes 3.3 $3,997,066
PG03 Palm Dr Dillon Rd I-10 Fwy. Multipurpose path/NEV
path
Yes 3.8 $4,602,682
COA06 Dillon Rd Ave 44 Harrison Pl Bike lanes Yes 1.5 $118,800
DL02 Dillon Rd Palm Springs Western city
limit (990 feet west of
Diablo Rd)
Eastern city limit (2660
feet east of Karen Ave)
Bike lanes Yes 1.5 $118,800
IN29 Dillon Rd Northern city limit (7450
feet south of Old Aqueduct
Rd)
Ave 44 Bike Path Yes 0.5 $506,880
RIV08 Dillon Rd Eastern Palm Springs city
limit (2660 feet east of
Karen Ave)
Northern Indio city limit
(7450 feet south of Old
Aqueduct Rd)
Bike lanes Yes 26.8 $2,122,560
CC24 Varner Rd Palm Dr Cathedral City Eastern
city limit (6310 feet east
of Date Palm Dr)
Bike lanes Yes 4.6 $364,320
COA51 Ave 48 Van Buren St Dillon Rd Multipurpose path/NEV
path
Yes 0.3 $363,370
COA52 Dillon Rd Ave 48 Whitewater River Sidewalk path/NEV path Yes 1.0 $1,030,656
Table 4-35, continued
Page 4-146
ID # Street/Path From To Class
Regionally
Significant?
Length
(mi.)
Estimated
Cost
LQ44 Fred Waring Dr
(Southbound Only)
Adam St Dune Palms Rd Buffered bike lanes/NEV
lanes
Yes 0.5 $50,160
LQ45 Fred Waring Dr Dune Palms Rd Jefferson St Bike lanes Yes 0.5 $39,600
HR02 Harrison St Ave 54 Airport Blvd. Bike route Yes 1.0 $36,960
H11102 Hwy 111 Gap between Palm Springs
city limit in northwest
(3560 feet east of Tipton
Rd)
Gap between Palm
Springs city linit in
northwest (3270 feet
north of Overture Dr)
Buffered bike lanes Yes 1.1 $110,352
H11130 Indio Blvd. I-10 Indio Eastern city limit
(Dillon Rd/Ave 48)
Buffered bike lanes Yes 1.3 $130,416
H11132 Hwy 111 3,520' south of Ave 54 Ave 58 Buffered bike lanes Yes 1.8 $180,576
H11133 Hwy 111 Ave 58 Parkside Dr Bike route Yes 15.6 $576,576
PS176 N. Palm Canyon Palm Springs North City
Limit (3270 feet north of
Overture Dr)
Vista Chino Bike route Yes 5.3 $195,888
PS53 Hwy 111 Haugen-Lehmann Way Gap between Palm
Springs city limit in
northwest (3560 feet
east of Tipton Rd)
Bike route Yes 3.8 $140,448
RIV05 Indian Ave/ N. Indian
Canyon Dr
Pierson Blvd. I-10 Fwy. Bike lanes Yes 3.9 $308,880
IN46 Jackson St Ave 50 Ave 52 Bike lanes Yes 1.0 $79,200
JK06 Jackson St Ave 52 Airport Blvd Bike lanes Yes 2.0 $158,400
LQ52 Monroe St Ave 54 Mountain View Ln. Bike lanes/NEV lanes Yes 0.5 $39,600
LQ52A Monroe St Ave 54 Mountain View Ln. Multipurpose path Yes 0.5 $646,272
BL01 Colorado River Blythe Northern city limit
(6th Ave)
Blythe Southern city
limit (Parallel with
South end of Riviera Dr)
Bike path No 8.7 $8,562,470
BL02 Hobson Way Blythe Western city limit
(2640 feet west of Buck
Blvd)
950 feet east of
Summer Dr
Colored bike lanes No 9.3 $1,227,600
BL04 Chanslor Way Ehlers Blvd. to Main St El Dorado St to Olive
Lake Blvd.
Bike lanes No 1.4 $110,880
BL06 De Frain Blvd. 4th Ave Blythe Western city
limit (860 feet west of
De Frain Blvd)
Bike path No 2.8 $2,755,738
BL08 6th Ave Blythe Western city limit
(2220 feet west of College
Dr)
Blythe Eastern city limit
(1320 feet east of De
Frain Blvd)
Bike lanes No 2.5 $198,000
Table 4-35, continued
Page 4-147
ID # Street/Path From To Class
Regionally
Significant?
Length
(mi.)
Estimated
Cost
BL21A AZ&CA Railroad
Corridor
Blythe Northern city limit
(8th Ave)
Blythe Southern city
limit (690 feet south of
W 14th Ave)
Bike path No 3.2 $3,149,414
BL24 8th Ave Blythe Western city limit
(1340 feet west of De Frain
Blvd)
Blythe Eastern city limit
(2730 feet east of
Lovekin Blvd)
Bike lanes No 1.8 $142,560
BL26 7th St/C&D Blvd. I-10 Freeway Blythe Southern city
limit (1330 feet south of
14th Ave)
Bike route No 0.5 $18,480
BL27 10th Ave Blythe Western city limit
(930 feet west of De Frain
Blvd)
Olive Lake Blvd. Bike lanes No 4.2 $332,640
BL30 Hwy 78/Neighbours
Blvd.
Blythe Northern city limit
(1330 feet north of
Riverside Ave)
Blythe Southern city
limit (200 feet north of
14th Ave)
Bike lanes No 1.2 $95,040
BL31 Riverside Ave Neighbours Blvd. Arrowhead Blvd. Bike lanes No 1.0 $79,200
CC30 Da Vall Dr Varner Rd. Dinah Shore Dr Bike lanes Yes 3.3 $261,360
COA21 West side of Southern
Pacific RR corridor
Coachella Northern city
limit (Ave 48)
Coachella Southern city
limit (3520 feet south of
Ave 54)
Bike path Yes 4.4 $4,330,445
COA26 SR-86S Expressway Dillon Rd Coachella Southern city
limit (Airport Blvd)
Bike route No 5.2 $192,192
COA35 Connector to Coachella
Canal
Polk St 1930 feet west of Pierce
St
Bike path No 2.4 $2,362,061
COA37 Ave 54 Van Buren St Whitewater River Bike lanes Yes 3.2 $253,440
COA39 Van Buren St Ave 48 Ave 54 Bike lanes Yes 3.0 $237,600
COA50 Pierce St Coachella Northern city
limit (1320 feet north of
Ave 55)
Coachella Southern city
limit (Ave 55)
Bike lanes Yes 0.2 $15,840
DHS06A Pierson Blvd., Miracle
Hill Rd
Sierra Blvd. to Indian
Canyon Rd
Cholla Dr to Palm Dr Greenback Sharrows
(Buffered bike lanes with
road diet)
Yes 5.0 $343,200
DHS08 West Dr Desert Hot Springs
northern city limit (650
feet north of Avenida
Jalisco)
15th Ave Bike lanes Yes 3.5 $277,200
DHS10 Mountain View Rd Desert View Ave Camino Campanero Bike route Yes 1.3 $48,048
DHS13 8th St West Dr Blind Canyon Bike lanes No 0.2 $15,840
DHS18 Blind Canyon 40 feet north of 13th Ave
and 595 feet east of Calle
De Familia
New schools north of
Mission Lakes Blvd.
Bike path No 0.9 $885,773
Table 4-35, continued
Page 4-148
ID # Street/Path From To Class
Regionally
Significant?
Length
(mi.)
Estimated
Cost
DHS20 North side of Hacienda
Ave
Long Canyon Julius Corsini
Elementary School
Bike path Yes 0.3 $295,258
DHS29 Little Morongo Rd Augusta Ave Pierson Blvd. Bike route Yes 1.7 $62,832
DHS31 Mission Lakes Blvd Indian Ave Verbena Dr Buffered bike lanes Yes 4.1 $411,312
IN34 Indio Blvd. Jefferson St Dillon Rd Bike lanes Yes 5.1 $403,920
IN64 Ave 40/ Fifties Way Varner Rd Monroe St Buffered bike lanes Yes 3.5 $351,120
IN74 Adams St Ave 38 Ave 40 Buffered bike lanes No 1.0 $100,320
IN81 Ave 45/ Van Buren St/
Cabazon Rd
Golf Center Pkwy. Dillon Rd Bike route Yes 1.9 $70,224
IN84 Van Buren St Indio Blvd. Ave 48 Bike lanes Yes 0.5 $39,600
IN86 Eastside Dr Madison St Monroe St Bike lanes No 1.2 $91,080
LQ23A Washington St Palm Desert city limit (80
feet North of Country Club
Dr)
La Quinta Northern City
Limit
Greenback sharrows Yes 1.5 $102,960
LQ51 Ave 62 Madison St Monroe St Bike lanes/NEV lanes Yes 1.0 $79,200
LQ51A Ave 62 Madison St Monroe St Multipurpose path Yes 1.0 $1,292,544
LQ53 Monroe St Ave 58 Ave 62 Bike lanes/NEV lanes No 2.0 $158,400
LQ53A Monroe St Ave 58 Ave 62 Multipurpose path No 2.0 $2,585,088
PD56 Mid-Valley Bike Path
(SPRR corridor)
Palm Desert Western city
limit (3250 feet nrothwest
of Monterey Ave)
Palm Desert Eastern city
limit (Washington St)
Bike path Yes 7.0 $7,451,136
RIV12 Hwy 111* Future Extension to Mecca-
North Shore
Salton Sea State Park Bike Path Yes 18.0 $17,708,000
RIV200A Ave 20 Wall Rd Diablo Rd Bike lanes Yes 0.3 $23,760
RM130 Bob Hope Dr Ramon Rd Hwy 111 Bike lanes (partial)** Yes 5.5 $219,644
RM135 Dinah Shore Dr Plumley Rd Monterey Ave Bike lanes (partial)** Yes 3.6 $141,534
RM140 Los Alamos Dr Ramon Rd Dinah Shore Dr Bike lanes No 1.0 $79,568
RM141 Los Alamos Rd RR ROW Ramon Rd Bike lanes No 0.7 $52,294
PIER01 Pierson Blvd SR-62 N. Indian Canyon Dr Greenback sharrows
(Buffered bike lanes with
road diet)
Yes 2.6 $178,464
RIV15A Ramon Rd Bob Hope Dr Washington St Bike lanes Yes 4.8 $380,160
RIV139 Olive St Center St South of Church St Bike lane/NEV lane Yes 0.1 $7,920
RIV140 Olive St South of Church St Thermal Ball Park Bike route Yes 0.1 $3,696
RIV202 Center St Polk St Olive St Bike lanes Yes 0.1 $7,920
WR01 Ramon Rd/Washington
St
Ramon Rd Palm Desert city limit
(580 feet North of
Country Club Dr)
Bike lanes Yes 5.2 $411,840
RIV200 Ave 20 Worsley Rd Wall Rd Bike lanes Yes 0.8 $61,776
RIV201 Worsley Rd Ave 20 Pierson Blvd. Bike lanes Yes 1.8 $142,560
Coachella Valley
Table 4-35, continued
Page 4-149
ID # Street/Path From To Class
Regionally
Significant?
Length
(mi.)
Estimated
Cost
RIV203 Airport Blvd Orange St Buchanan St Bike lanes No 2.5 $198,000
RIV78 Airport Blvd Monroe St Polk St Bike lanes Yes 5.0 $396,000
DHS100 Ave 20 N Indian Canyon Dr Palm Dr Bike lanes Yes 4.1 $324,720
RIV100 Hayes St Hwy 111 Salton Sea Trail Bike lanes No 0.8 $63,360
RIV101 Polk St Ave 62 Ave 66 Bike path Yes 2.0 $1,968,384
RIV103 Dale Killer Rd Ave 64 Ave 66 Bike path No 1.0 $984,192
RIV104 Dale Killer Rd Ave 64 Ave 66 Bike lanes No 1.0 $79,200
RIV105 Garfield St Coachella Canal Salton Sea Trail Bike lanes No 3.5 $277,200
RIV106 Arthur St Ave 66 Ave 70 Bike path No 1.8 $1,771,546
RIV107 Arthur St Coachella Canal Salton Sea Trail Bike lanes No 2.7 $213,840
RIV108 Lincoln St Ave 66 Ave 68 Bike path No 1.0 $984,192
RIV109 Lincoln St Ave 66 Ave 68 Bike lanes No 1.0 $79,200
RIV11 Salton Sea Trail Whitewater River Cleveland St Bike path No 6.3 $6,200,410
RIV110 Ave 68 Hayes St Arthur St Bike lanes No 2.0 $158,400
RIV111 Ave 70 Lincoln St Cleveland St Bike lanes No 6.0 $475,200
RIV112 Ave 70 Arthur St Cleveland St Bike path No 1.0 $984,192
RIV113 Cleveland St Ave 70 Salton Sea Trail Bike path No 0.5 $492,096
RIV114 Cleveland St Ave 70 Hwy 111 Bike lanes No 0.5 $39,600
RIV115 Vander Veer Rd Coachella Canal Hwy 111 Bike lanes No 1.8 $142,560
RIV116 Parkside Dr Coachella Canal Salton Sea Trail Bike lanes No 2.5 $198,000
RIV141 Martinez Rd Ave 66 Polk St Bike lanes No 0.8 $63,360
RIV17 70th Ave 86th Ave Imperial County limit Bike route No 16.6 $613,536
RIV18 I-10 parallel Whitewater River Garnet Ave Bike path No 1.0 $984,192
RIV19 Palm Canyon Wash Palm Springs city limit (290
feet southwest of Corsica
Ct)
South Palm Canyon Dr Bike path No 0.5 $492,096
RIV20 Long Canyon Wash Joshua Tree National Park Cathedral City city limit
(1680 feet south of
Moon Ranch Rd)
Bike path Yes 5.2 $5,117,798
RIV22 Coachella Canal Coachella city limit (Ave
52)
Parkside Dr Bike path No 16.0 $15,747,072
RIV24 Blind Canyon Mission Creek Intersection of 8th St
and Cholla Dr
Bike path No 0.7 $688,934
RIV28 Mid-way between
Monroe and Jackson
Streets
Ave 52 Ave 54 Bike path No 1.2 $1,181,030
RIV29 Mid-way between
Jackson and Van Buren
Streets
Ave 58 Ave 64 Bike path No 2.0 $1,968,384
RIV30 Midway between Polk
St and Fillmore St
Ave 60 Ave 65 Bike path No 3.0 $2,952,576
Table 4-35, continued
Page 4-150
ID # Street/Path From To Class
Regionally
Significant?
Length
(mi.)
Estimated
Cost
RIV33 Ave 51 Jackson St Eastern city limit (1360
feet east of Calhoun St)
Bike lanes No 0.8 $63,360
RIV34 Ave 58 Monroe St to Harrison St
and
Fillmore St to Buchanan
St
Bike lanes Yes 4.9 $388,080
RIV35 Ave 58 SR-86 Buchanan St Bike path Yes 1.6 $1,574,707
RIV36 Ave 60 La Quinta city limit (1320
feet west of Monroe St)
Lincoln St Bike lanes Yes 8.6 $681,120
RIV37 Ave 60 Polk St to Whitewater
River
Pierce to Lincoln St Bike path Yes 3.1 $3,050,995
RIV38 Ave 61 Whitewater River Coachella Canal Bike lanes No 4.1 $324,720
RIV39 Ave 61 Lincoln St Coachella Canal Bike path No 1.5 $1,476,288
RIV40 Ave 63 Harrison St Fillmore St Bike path No 3.0 $2,952,576
RIV41 Ave 63 Harrison St Fillmore St Bike lanes No 3.0 $237,600
RIV42 Ave 64 Monroe St to Van Buren St Pierce St to Coachella
Canal
Bike lanes No 11.7 $926,640
RIV43 Ave 64 Harrison St Pierce St and to Ave 66 Bike path No 5.5 $5,413,056
RIV44 Ave 65 Polk St to Pierce St Lincoln St to Johnson St Bike lanes No 3.0 $237,600
RIV45 Ave 65 Polk St Pierce St Bike path No 2.0 $1,968,384
RIV46 Ave 66, Box Canyon Rd Jackson St 470 feet east of Painted
Canyon Rd
Bike lanes No 13.2 $1,045,440
RIV47 Ave 66 East of Tyler St to Polk St Whitewater River to
Lincoln St and to 1480
feet east of Arthur Rd
Bike path No 8.6 $8,464,051
RIV48 Ave 68 Polk St to Fillmore St Buchanan St to Arthur
St
Bike lanes No 7.0 $554,400
RIV49 Ave 69 Fillmore St Pierce St Bike lanes No 1.0 $79,200
RIV50 Ave 70 Harrison St to Cleveland St Vander Veer Rd to
Coachella Canal
Bike lanes No 13.1 $1,037,520
RIV51 Ave 70 Arthur St Cleveland St Bike path No 1.0 $984,192
RIV52 Ave 74 Fillmore St Pierce St Bike lanes No 1.0 $79,200
RIV53 Ave 81 Johnson St Pierce St Bike lanes No 3.0 $237,600
RIV54 Ave 82 Ave 81 Johnson St Bike lanes No 2.0 $158,400
RIV55 Ave 84 SR-86S Johnson St Bike lanes No 0.8 $63,360
RIV56 Cleveland St Hwy 111 Salton Sea north shore
path
Bike lanes No 0.6 $47,520
RIV57 Railroad Ave Cabazon Haugen Lehman Way Bike lanes No 3.9 $308,880
RIV58 Tipton Rd, Whitewater
Cutoff
Hwy 111 I-10/ SR-62 connector Bike lanes No 1.1 $87,120
RIV60 Fillmore St Airport Blvd. to Ave 58 Hwy 111 to Ave 74 Bike lanes No 9.9 $784,080
RIV61 Fillmore St Ave 62 to Ave 64 Ave 65 to Ave66 Bike path No 1.5 $1,476,288
RIV62 1000 Palms Canyon Rd Dillon Rd Ramon Rd Bike lanes Yes 4.7 $372,240
Table 4-35, continued
Page 4-151
ID # Street/Path From To Class
Regionally
Significant?
Length
(mi.)
Estimated
Cost
RIV64 Desert Cactus Dr Airport Blvd. Ave 58 Bike lanes No 0.7 $55,440
RIV65 Harrison St Airport Blvd. 70th Ave Bike route Yes 18.2 $672,672
RIV66 Jackson St Ave 52 to Ave 60 Ave 64 to Ave 66 Bike lanes Yes 5.0 $396,000
RIV67 Johnson St Ave 62 to Salton Sea Trail Ave 81 to Ave 84 Bike lanes No 6.1 $483,120
RIV68 Lincoln St Ave 60 Whitewater River Bike lanes No 4.9 $388,080
RIV69 Lincoln St Ave 60 Salton Sea Trail Bike path No 5.0 $4,920,960
RIV71 Long Canyon Rd Desert Hot Springs city
limit (1320 feet north of
Camino Zangri)
Dillon Rd Bike lanes Yes 1.5 $118,800
RIV72 Monroe St Ave 62 Ave 64 Bike lanes Yes 1.0 $79,200
RIV73 Mountain View Rd Desert Hot Springs city
limit (1330 feet north of
Louisan St)
Dillon Rd Bike route Yes 0.2 $7,392
RIV74 Pierce St Ave 52 to Ave 60 Ave 66 to Harrison St Bike lanes Yes 11.9 $942,480
RIV75A Pierce St 52 Ave 60 Ave Bike path No 4.0 $3,936,768
RIV75B Pierce St 1000' North of 55 Ave 55 Ave Bike path No 0.2 $186,400
RIV75C Pierce St Ave 52 1000' North of 55 Ave Bike path No 0.2 $186,400
RIV76 Ave 58/ Ave 61
diagonal path
Ave 58/ Hwy 86 Ave 60/ Ave 65 diagonal
path
Bike path No 2.5 $2,460,480
RIV77 Ave 60/ Ave 65
diagonal path
Ave 60 Ave 63 Bike path No 2.5 $2,460,480
RIV79 16th Ave Windhaven Dr Worsley Rd Bike Route No 2.4 $2,362,061
RIV79A Painted Hills Rd Whitewater Cutoff 16th Ave Bike path No 2.4 $2,362,061
RIV81 SR-62 Dillon Rd to Desert Hot
Springs city limit (Pierson
Blvd)
Desert Hot Springs city
limit (2570 feet north of
Mission Creek Rd) to 3.2
miles north of Mission
Creek Rd
Bike route No 5.2 $192,192
RIV82 Mountain View Rd Dillon Rd Cathedral City city limit
(410 feet north of
Varner Rd)
Bike lanes Yes 2.5 $198,000
RIV83 Ave 54 Monroe St Van Buren St Bike lanes Yes 2.0 $158,400
RIV84 Ave 54 Harrison St Tyler St Bike path Yes 1.3 $1,279,450
RIV85 Tyler St Ave 54 Airport Blvd. Bike path Yes 1.0 $984,192
RIV86 Tyler St Ave 54 Airport Blvd. Bike lanes Yes 1.0 $79,200
RIV87 Tyler St Ave 64 Ave 65 Bike path No 0.5 $492,096
RIV88 Tyler St Ave60 Ave 66 Bike lanes No 3.0 $237,600
RIV89 Ave 62 Monroe St Coachella Canal Bike lanes Yes 11.0 $871,200
RIV90 Ave 62 Monroe St Whitewater River Bike path Yes 6.4 $6,298,829
RIV91 Hammond Rd Lincoln St Ave 70 Bike lanes No 3.9 $308,880
RIV92 Van Buren St 54th Ave Airport Blvd. Bike lanes Yes 1.0 $79,200
Table 4-35, continued
Page 4-152
ID # Street/Path From To Class
Regionally
Significant?
Length
(mi.)
Estimated
Cost
RIV93 Buchanan St Airport Blvd. Ave 60 Bike lanes No 2.0 $158,400
RIV94 Buchanan St Airport Blvd. Ave 60 Bike path No 2.0 $1,968,384
RIV95 Grant St Ave 62 Hammond Rd Bike lanes No 3.5 $277,200
RIV96 Grant St Ave 62 Hammond Rd Bike path No 3.5 $3,444,672
RIV97 Grant St Hwy 111 Salton Sea Trail Bike lanes No 1.7 $134,640
RIV98 Grant St Hwy 111 Salton Sea Trail Bike path No 1.7 $1,673,126
RIV99 Hayes St Ave 64 Ave 70 Bike lanes No 3.0 $237,600
RIV102B Polk St Center St Ave 70 Bike lanes Yes 6.7 $530,640
BSCC Buchanan St Ave 60 Ave 62 Bike lanes No 1.0 $79,200
RIV90A Ave 62 Whitewater River Buchanan St Bike path Yes 1.5 $1,476,288
RIV21 Mission Creek Pierson Blvd. Dillon Rd Multipurpose path/NEV
path
Yes 2.7 $5,935,037
RIV04 Mountain View Rd 20th Ave Varner Rd Bike lanes Yes 1.3 $102,960
RIV25 Varner Rd Da Vall Dr Indio western city limit
(1020 feet west of 40th
Ave)
Bike lanes Yes 11.0 $871,200
RIV102A Polk St Airport Blvd. Center St Multipurpose path/NEV
path
Yes 0.3 $363,370
RIV78D Airport Blvd Polk St Whitewater River Multipurpose path/NEV
path
Yes 0.5 $605,616
RIV80 SR-86 parallel Airport Blvd Hwy 111 Bike Route No 10.9 $402,864
RIV59 Wall Rd, Garnet Ave West end of Garnet Ave Ave 20 Bike lanes No 1.1 $87,120
BPRIV01 Bicycle Parking Program $10,000
WSRIV01 Wayfinding Signage $2,964,000
Palo Verde Valley
RIV117 Colorado River Clark Ranch Rd to Northern
Blythe city limit (6th Ave)
Southern Blythe city
limit (700 feet east of
southern end of Riviera
Dr) to Imperial County
line (38th Ave)
Bike path No 22.2 $21,849,062
RIV118 US-95 north end of Palo Verde
Valley (3.5 miles south of
Cotton Tail Ln)
Blythe city limit (10th
Ave)
Bike lanes No 5.2 $411,840
RIV119 Hobsonway, Blackrock
Rd
Mesa Dr Blythe city limit (2640
feet west of Buck Blvd)
Bike lanes No 2.0 $158,400
RIV120 Riverside Ave Arrowhead Blvd. Blythe city limit (Ehlers
Blvd)
Bike lanes No 1.5 $118,800
RIV121 Ave 6 Blythe city limit (2680 feet
east of Lovekin Blvd)
C&D Blvd. Bike path No 2.0 $1,968,384
RIV122 Ave 6 1 mile east of De Frain
Blvd.
Olive Lake Blvd. Bike lanes No 3.5 $277,200
Table 4-35, continued
Page 4-153
ID # Street/Path From To Class
Regionally
Significant?
Length
(mi.)
Estimated
Cost
RIV123 Ave 10 Neighbours Blvd. Blythe city limit (880
feet west of De Frain
Blvd)
Bike lanes No 1.8 $142,560
RIV124 Ave 14 Neighbours Blvd. Solano Ave Bike lanes No 2.9 $229,680
RIV125 Ave 18 SR-78 Intake Blvd. Bike lanes No 5.0 $396,000
RIV126 Intake Blvd. Seeley Ave Ave 18 Bike lanes No 1.0 $79,200
RIV127 AZ & CA Railroad Arlington Mine Rd Blythe city limit (Ave 8) Bike path No 20.5 $20,175,936
RIV128 Main Canal Ave 8 Colorado River Bike path No 10.1 $9,940,339
RIV129 7th St/C&D Blvd. Ave 6 to Ave 10 Blythe city limit (1320
feet south of 11th Ave)
to Ave 18
Bike lanes No 3.8 $300,960
RIV130 Canal Path Neighbours Blvd. Blythe city limit (1300
feet west of De Frain
Blvd)
Bike path No 1.0 $984,192
RIV131 Lovekin Blvd. Ave 4 to Blythe city limit
(8th Ave)
Blythe city limit
(Commercial St) to Ave
18
Bike lanes No 3.8 $300,960
RIV132 Hwy 78 I-10 Ave 18 Bike lanes No 2.8 $221,760
RIV133 Ave 4 Blythe city limit (2700 feet
east of De Frain Blvd)
US-95 Bike lanes No 2.5 $198,000
RIV134 Ave 8 2630 feet west of N C and
D Blvd
5300 feet east of SR-95 Bike lanes No 2.1 $166,320
RIV135 Seeley Ave SR-78 Intake Blvd. Bike lanes No 5.0 $396,000
RIV136 Arrowhead Blvd. Ave 10 to Riverside Ave I-10 Fwy. to Ave 18 Bike lanes No 3.3 $261,360
RIV137 De Frain Blvd. Blythe city limit (I-10) Ave 18 Bike lanes No 2.3 $182,160
TOTAL $272,222,092
*Planned regional active transportation project with assumed facility type for costing purposes.
A¡
!"`$
!"`$
!"`$
UNIONPACIFICRR
4/1
7
/
2
0
1
7
J
N
M
:
\
M
d
a
t
a
\
1
4
4
8
3
7
\
G
I
S
\
M
X
D
\
A
c
t
i
v
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
\
A
T
P
C
i
t
y
M
a
p
s
\
L
o
c
a
l
M
X
D
s
F
i
n
a
l
\
L
o
c
a
l
M
a
p
s
N
o
I
D
N
e
w
S
y
m
b
o
l
o
g
y
9
_
1
4
_
1
6
\
C
V
A
G
A
T
P
R
i
v
e
r
s
i
d
e
C
o
u
n
t
y
N
o
r
t
h
n
o
I
D
U
p
d
a
t
e
.
m
x
d
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG
¯0 21Miles
m mSee County of Riverside - Northeast
AÙ
CVAG ATP City of Unincorporated Riverside CountyLocal Network
Figure 4-35a
"#= Proposed Index
"8"7
"2
"6
"9
"10
"11
"12
"13
"14
"16
"17
"18
"19
"20
"3
"1
"4
Bike pathBike/NEV path
Multipurpose path Multipurpose NEV path
Bike laneBike/NEV lane
Buffered bike lane
Buffered bike/NEV laneColored bike lane
Colored bike/NEV laneColored buffered bike lane
Colored buffered bike/NEV lane
Double colored buffered bike laneBike route
Greenback sharrowsBike path (partial)
Bike lanes (partial)Golf path
"21
"22Golf laneN/A
Proposed Bicycle Facilities Existing Bicycle Facilities
Bike pathMultipurpose pathSidewalk path
Bike laneBuffered bike lane
Bike route
Greenback sharrows
Bike path (partial)
(!#= Existing Index
(!1
(!3
(!6
(!8
(!5
(!16
(!17
(!18
Colored buffered bike lane
Colored buffered bike lane/NEV lane(!12
(!13
Bike lanes (partial)
Golf path(!19
(!20
Proposed Transit Bike Parking
Bike Parking
*#Proposed
*#ExistingBike Amenities
*#Proposed
#Existing
*#Bike Locker
##Bike Rack
AÌ
!"`$
!"`$
!"`$
AÙ
AÙ
UNIONPACIFICRR
4/1
7
/
2
0
1
7
J
N
M
:
\
M
d
a
t
a
\
1
4
4
8
3
7
\
G
I
S
\
M
X
D
\
A
c
t
i
v
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
\
A
T
P
C
i
t
y
M
a
p
s
\
L
o
c
a
l
M
X
D
s
F
i
n
a
l
\
L
o
c
a
l
M
a
p
s
N
o
I
D
N
e
w
S
y
m
b
o
l
o
g
y
9
_
1
4
_
1
6
\
C
V
A
G
A
T
P
R
i
v
e
r
s
i
d
e
C
o
u
n
t
y
N
o
r
t
h
E
a
s
t
n
o
I
D
U
p
d
a
t
e
.
m
x
d
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG
¯0 21Miles
m mSee County of Riverside - North
m mSee County of Riverside - Center CVAG ATP City of Unincorporated Riverside CountyLocal Network
Figure 4-35b
"#= Proposed Index
"8"7
"2
"6
"9
"10
"11
"12
"13
"14
"16
"17
"18
"19
"20
"3
"1
"4
Bike path
Bike/NEV path
Multipurpose path
Multipurpose NEV path
Bike laneBike/NEV lane
Buffered bike lane
Buffered bike/NEV lane
Colored bike lane
Colored bike/NEV laneColored buffered bike lane
Colored buffered bike/NEV laneDouble colored buffered bike lane
Bike route
Greenback sharrowsBike path (partial)
Bike lanes (partial)Golf path
"21
"22Golf lane
N/A
Proposed Bicycle Facilities Existing Bicycle Facilities
Bike pathMultipurpose path
Sidewalk pathBike lane
Buffered bike lane
Bike route
Greenback sharrows
Bike path (partial)
(!#= Existing Index
(!1
(!3
(!6
(!8
(!5
(!16
(!17
(!18
Colored buffered bike laneColored buffered bike lane/NEV lane(!12
(!13
Bike lanes (partial)
Golf path(!19
(!20
Proposed Transit Bike Parking
Bike Parking
*#Proposed
*#ExistingBike Amenities
*#Proposed
#Existing
*#Bike Locker
##Bike Rack
!"`$
!"`$
A¿
AÙ
A¿
AÙ
AÙ
UNIO
N
P
A
C
I
F
I
C
R
R
4/1
7
/
2
0
1
7
J
N
M
:
\
M
d
a
t
a
\
1
4
4
8
3
7
\
G
I
S
\
M
X
D
\
A
c
t
i
v
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
\
A
T
P
C
i
t
y
M
a
p
s
\
L
o
c
a
l
M
X
D
s
F
i
n
a
l
\
L
o
c
a
l
M
a
p
s
N
o
I
D
N
e
w
S
y
m
b
o
l
o
g
y
9
_
1
4
_
1
6
\
C
V
A
G
A
T
P
R
i
v
e
r
s
i
d
e
C
o
u
n
t
y
C
e
n
t
e
r
n
o
I
D
U
p
d
a
t
e
.
m
x
d
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG
¯0 21Miles
m mSee County of Riverside - Northeast
m mSee County of Riverside - South CVAG ATP City of Unincorporated Riverside CountyLocal Network
Figure 4-35c
"#= Proposed Index
"8"7
"2
"6
"9
"10
"11
"12
"13
"14
"16
"17
"18
"19
"20
"3
"1
"4
Bike path
Bike/NEV path
Multipurpose path Multipurpose NEV path
Bike laneBike/NEV lane
Buffered bike lane
Buffered bike/NEV lane
Colored bike lane
Colored bike/NEV laneColored buffered bike lane
Colored buffered bike/NEV lane
Double colored buffered bike lane
Bike route
Greenback sharrowsBike path (partial)
Bike lanes (partial)
Golf path
"21
"22Golf lane
N/A
Proposed Bicycle Facilities Existing Bicycle Facilities
Bike pathMultipurpose path
Sidewalk path
Bike laneBuffered bike lane
Bike route
Greenback sharrows
Bike path (partial)
(!#= Existing Index
(!1
(!3
(!6
(!8
(!5
(!16
(!17
(!18
Colored buffered bike lane
Colored buffered bike lane/NEV lane(!12
(!13
Bike lanes (partial)
Golf path(!19
(!20
Proposed Transit Bike Parking
Bike Parking
*#Proposed
*#ExistingBike Amenities
*#Proposed
#Existing
*#Bike Locker
##Bike Rack
*#
*#
*#*#*#*#
*#
##
##
##
WhitewaterRiver
CoachellaCanal
66TH AVE
62ND AVE
PI
E
R
C
E
S
T
VA
N
B
U
R
E
N
S
T
CA
L
H
O
U
N
S
T
60TH AVE
HA
R
R
I
S
O
N
S
T
61ST AVE
64TH AVE
63RD AVE
LIN
C
O
L
N
S
T
65TH AVE
JO
H
N
S
O
N
S
T
68TH AVE
GR
A
N
T
S
T
70TH AVEJO
H
N
S
O
N
S
T
LI
N
C
O
L
N
S
T
HA
Y
E
S
S
T
GA
R
F
I
E
L
D
S
T
AR
T
H
U
R
S
T
68TH AVE
DA
L
E
K
I
L
E
R
R
D
65TH AVE
69TH AVE
CL
E
V
E
L
A
N
D
S
T
VA
N
D
E
R
V
E
E
R
R
D
FI
L
L
M
O
R
E
S
T
COAC
H
E
L
L
A
C
A
N
A
L
R
D
PO
L
K
S
T
74TH AVE
HAR
R
I
S
O
N
S
T
81ST AVE
82ST AVE
84ST AVE
JO
H
N
S
O
N
S
T
PARKSIDE DR
SALTON SEA
T
R
A
I
L
COAC
H
E
L
L
A
C
A
N
A
L
R
D
VA
N
B
U
R
E
N
S
T
PO
L
K
ST
62ND AVE
TY
L
E
R
S
T
HARR
I
S
O
N
S
T
BOX C
A
N
Y
O
N
R
D
BU
C
H
A
N
A
N
S
T
PI
E
R
C
E
S
T
""6
""6
""1
""6
""1
""1
""6
""6
""6
""1
""1
""6
""1
""1
""1
""6
""1
""6
""6
""6
""1
""1
""1
""16 ""6""1
""6
""6
""6
""1
""1
""6
""6
""1
""6
""6
""1
""6
""6
""1
""1
""1
""1 ""6
""1
""16
""6
""1
""1
""6""6
""6""6
""6
""6
""6
""6
""6
""6
""1
""6
""16
""1
""6
""1
""1
""16
""2
""6
""1 ""1
""6""6""6
""16
""1
""1 ""1
""6
""22
""16""6
""6
""6
""6
""6
""6
""6
""16""16
""6
""6
UNIONPACIFICRR
4/1
7
/
2
0
1
7
J
N
M
:
\
M
d
a
t
a
\
1
4
4
8
3
7
\
G
I
S
\
M
X
D
\
A
c
t
i
v
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
\
A
T
P
C
i
t
y
M
a
p
s
\
L
o
c
a
l
M
X
D
s
F
i
n
a
l
\
L
o
c
a
l
M
a
p
s
N
o
I
D
N
e
w
S
y
m
b
o
l
o
g
y
9
_
1
4
_
1
6
\
C
V
A
G
A
T
P
R
i
v
e
r
s
i
d
e
C
o
u
n
t
y
S
o
u
t
h
n
o
I
D
U
p
d
a
t
e
.
m
x
d
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG
¯0 21Miles
SALTON SEA
A¿AÙ
m mSee County of Riverside - Center
"#= Proposed Index
"8"7
"2
"6
"9
"10
"11
"12
"13
"14
"16
"17
"18
"19
"20
"3
"1
"4
Bike pathBike/NEV path
Multipurpose path Multipurpose NEV path
Bike laneBike/NEV lane
Buffered bike lane
Buffered bike/NEV laneColored bike lane
Colored bike/NEV laneColored buffered bike lane
Colored buffered bike/NEV lane
Double colored buffered bike laneBike route
Greenback sharrowsBike path (partial)
Bike lanes (partial)Golf path
"21
"22Golf lane
N/A
Proposed Bicycle Facilities Existing Bicycle Facilities
Bike pathMultipurpose path
Sidewalk path
Bike lane
Buffered bike lane
Bike route
Greenback sharrows
Bike path (partial)
(!#= Existing Index
(!1
(!3
(!6
(!8
(!5
(!16
(!17
(!18
Colored buffered bike laneColored buffered bike lane/NEV lane(!12
(!13
Bike lanes (partial)
Golf path(!19
(!20
Proposed Transit Bike Parking
Bike Parking
*#Proposed
*#ExistingBike Amenities
*#Proposed
#Existing
*#Bike Locker
##Bike Rack
CVAG ATP City of Unincorporated Riverside CountyLocal Network
Figure 4-35d
Color
a
d
o
Riv
e
r
LO
V
E
K
I
N
BL
V
D
20THAVE
BR
O
A
D
W
A
Y
S
HOBSON WAY
10TH AVE
SEELEY AVE
14TH AVE
DEFRAIN
BLVD
INTAKE
BLVD
AR
R
O
W
H
E
A
D
BL
V
D 18THAVE
RIVERSIDEAVE
6THAVE
DST15TH AVE
ST
E
P
H
E
N
S
O
N
BL
V
D
MIDLANDRD
5THAVE
4THAVE
8THAVE
2NDAVE
ME
G
I
N
AV
E
7THAVEDA
V
E
S
T
BU
C
K
BL
V
D
9THAVE
ODENWAY
3RDAVE
KE
I
M
B
L
V
D
11THAVE
ARZCRR
AR
Z
C
R
R
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG
¯0 21Miles
!"`$
IÄ
A¸
CVAG ATP City of Unincorporated Riverside CountyLocal Network
Figure 4-35e
"#= Proposed Index
"8"7
"2
"6
"9
"10
"11
"12
"13
"14
"16
"17
"18
"19
"20
"3
"1
"4
Bike path
Bike/NEV path
Multipurpose path
Multipurpose NEV path
Bike laneBike/NEV lane
Buffered bike lane
Buffered bike/NEV lane
Colored bike lane
Colored bike/NEV laneColored buffered bike lane
Colored buffered bike/NEV laneDouble colored buffered bike lane
Bike route
Greenback sharrowsBike path (partial)
Bike lanes (partial)Golf path
"21
"22Golf lane
N/A
Proposed Bicycle Facilities Existing Bicycle Facilities
Bike pathMultipurpose path
Sidewalk pathBike lane
Buffered bike lane
Bike route
Greenback sharrows
Bike path (partial)
(!#= Existing Index
(!1
(!3
(!6
(!8
(!5
(!16
(!17
(!18
Colored buffered bike laneColored buffered bike lane/NEV lane(!12
(!13
Bike lanes (partial)
Golf path(!19
(!20
Proposed Transit Bike Parking
Bike Parking
*#Proposed
*#ExistingBike Amenities
*#Proposed
#Existing
*#Bike Locker
##Bike Rack
CVAG ATP Facilities Identifier
County of Riverside - North
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG
¯0 21
Miles
m mSee County of Riverside - Northeast
See CVAG ATP Chapter 4
Table for Facility ID Reference
Proposed Bicycle Facilities
Existing Bicycle Facilities
!!
Unincorporated Riverside County - North
Local Network with ATP IDs
Figure 4-35f
A
!$
CVAG ATP Facilities Identifier
County of Riverside - Northeast
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG
¯0 21
Miles
m mSee County of Riverside - North
m mSee County of Riverside - Center
See CVAG ATP Chapter 4
Table for Facility ID Reference
Proposed Bicycle Facilities
Existing Bicycle Facilities
!!
Unincorporated Riverside County - Northeast
Local Network with ATP IDs
Figure 4-35g
CVAG ATP Facilities Identifier
County of Riverside - Center
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG
¯0 21
Miles
m mSee County of Riverside - Northeast
m mSee County of Riverside - South
See CVAG ATP Chapter 4
Table for Facility ID Reference
Proposed Bicycle Facilities
Existing Bicycle Facilities
!!
Figure 4-35h
Unincorporated Riverside County - Center
Local Network with ATP IDs
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!!!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!!!!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!!!
!
!
!
RIV116
RIV36
RIV52
RIV54
RIV68
RIV56
60TH AVE
61ST AVE
64TH AVE
63RD AVE
65TH AVE
68TH AVE
70TH AVE
68TH AVE
65TH AVE
69TH AVE
74TH AVE
81ST AVE
82ST AVE
84ST AVE
PARKSIDE DR
62ND AVE
CVAG ATP Facilities Identifier
County of Riverside - South
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG
¯0 21
Miles
SALTON SEA
m mSee County of Riverside - Center
See CVAG ATP Chapter 4
Table for Facility ID Reference
Proposed Bicycle Facilities
Existing Bicycle Facilities
!!
Unincorporated Riverside County - South
Local Network with ATP IDs
Figure 4-35i
CVAG ATP Facilities Identifier
County of Riverside - East
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG
¯0 21
Miles
See CVAG ATP Chapter 4
Table for Facility ID Reference
Proposed Bicycle Facilities
Existing Bicycle Facilities
!!
County of Riverside - East
Local Network with ATP IDs
Figure 4-36a
Page 4-164
Bicycle Parking
Existing
Riverside County has bicycle parking at schools in the Desert Sands
Unified School District. Bicycle parking has been identified at the
following schools:
Martin Van Buren Elementary School, 47733 Van Buren
Street, Indio
Theodore Roosevelt Elementary School, 83200 Dr.
Carreon Blvd., Indio
Thomas Jefferson Middle School, 83-089 Highway 111,
Indio
Indio High School, 81750 Avenue 46, Indio
Dr. Carreon Academy, 47368 Monroe Street, Indio
Herbert Hoover Elementary School, 44300 Monroe Street,
Indio
Indio Middle School, 81195 Miles Avenue, Indio
Lyndon B. Johnson Elementary School, 44640 Clinton
Street, Indio
Carrillo Ranch Elementary School, 43775 Madison Street,
Indio
John Kennedy Elementary School, 45100 Clinton Street,
Indio
James Madison Elementary School, 80845 Avenue 46,
Indio
Amelia Earhart Elementary School, 45250 Dune Palms
Road. Indio
John Glenn Middle School, 79655 Miles Avenue, Indio
Desert Ridge Academy, 79-767 Avenue 39, Indio
Shadow Hills High School, 39,225 Jefferson Street, Indio
Amidtad High School, 83501 Dillon Avenue, Indio
Andrew Jackson Elementary School, 82-850 Kenner
Street, Indio
Colonel Mitchell Paige Middle School, 43495 Palm Royale
Drive, La Quinta
La Quinta High School, 79255 Westward Ho Drive, La
Quinta
Harry Truman Elementary School, 78870 Avenue 50, La
Quinta
La Quinta Middle School, 78900 Avenue 50, La Quinta
John Adams Elementary School, 50800 Desert Club Drive,
La Quinta
Benjamin Franklin Elementary School, 77800 Calle
Tampico, La Quinta
Horizon School, 43-300 Palm Royale Drive, La Quinta
Summit High School, 43-330 Palm Royale Drive, La
Quinta
Gerald Ford Elementary School, 44210 Warner Trail,
Indian Wells
Palm Desert High School, 74910 Aztec Road, Palm Desert
Ronald Reagan Elementary School, 39800 Liberty Drive,
Palm Desert
James Carter Elementary School, 74251 E. Hovley Lane,
Palm Desert
Palm Desert Charter Middle School, 74200 Rutledge Way,
Palm Desert
Abraham Lincoln Elementary School, 74100 Rutledge
Way, Palm Desert
Page 4-165
George Washington Charter School, 45768 Portola
Avenue, Palm Desert
James Monroe Elementary School, 42100 Yucca Lane,
Bermuda Dunes
Dwight Eisenhower Elementary School, 83-391 Dillon
Avenue, Unincorporated County
Proposed
The County of Riverside proposes bicycle parking facilities at:
Parks
Schools
High-density residential areas
Public buildings
Lake Cahuilla
Maclnyre
Mayflower
Links to Other Transportation Modes
The unincorporated areas of the county in the Coachella Valley are
served by SunLine Transit, which has bicycle racks on every bus in
its fleet. The older SunLine bus racks hold two bicycles, but the
new state-of-the-art racks will hold three bicycles per bus and are
very convenient to use for the bicyclist. No public transit operator
currently provides transit services in the Palo Verde Valley. No
transit stations or park-and-ride facilities currently exist in the
unincorporated areas of the Coachella and Palo Verde Valleys.
Bike racks and/or bike lockers are proposed by SunLine Transit at
selected bus stop locations in unincorporated portions of the
CVAG region. The locations are presented in Table 4-36.
Table 4-36. Proposed Bus Stop Locations for Bike Racks and/or
Bike Lockers in Unincorporated Riverside County
Line(s) Street Cross
Street
Stop
# Direction Position* Facility
Type
32 Ramon Rd Shelter Dr 427 WB FS Bike
rack
32 Ramon Rd Varner Rd 429 EB FS Bike
rack
91/95 Lincoln St Gardenia
Ct 867 NB NS Bike
rack
91/95 Lincoln St 63rd Ave 979 NB FS Bike
rack
* Position refers to the near side (NS) or far side (FS) of the intersection
Bicycle Amenities
There are currently no bicycle commuter–related showers or
clothing lockers in the unincorporated areas. The County currently
has no requirements for bicycle amenities in new buildings.
Bicycle Safety Education and Police Enforcement
The Riverside County Department of Public Health won a federal
Safe Routes to School grant to provide bicycle and pedestrian
safety education at multiple schools in Mecca, Thermal, and
Thousand Palms. The grant was used to:
hire a Safe Routes to School Coordinator;
conduct safety education assemblies;
host International Walk to School Days, bike rodeos,
Walking School Buses, and Walking Wednesdays events;
provide printed materials;
conduct Safe Routes to School workshops; and
increase law enforcement during school pickup and drop-
off times.
Page 4-166
The program also requests donations from local establishments to
provide prizes for students who walk to school. The program
started in federal Fiscal Year 2010–2011 and has been completed.
The County will continue to apply for funds to operate these
programs.
Wayfinding Signage
The County may seek funds for a citywide bikeway wayfinding
signage program. The wayfinding signage will connect with CV
Link and with downtown.
Past Expenditures for Bicycle Facilities
A Class I bike lane bicycle facility is located in the Coachella Valley
along Palm Drive between the Desert Hot Springs city limit and
Interstate 10. There are no records as to how this bike lane was
funded.
Maintenance Policies
The County of Riverside inspects and sweeps the Santa Ana River
Class I bike paths weekly. Future maintenance of the bike paths
depends on the outcome of the Riverside County Comprehensive
Trails Plan that is now in process.
On-street striping is done with regular road maintenance.
Roadways are resurfaced when funds are available, approximately
every 20 years.
Other Related Policies
The County of Riverside has no other related policies.
Coordination with Neighboring Jurisdictions
Since this Plan covers the entire Coachella and Palo Verde Valleys,
the plans of neighboring cities and the unincorporated county were
coordinated to ensure links.
Future Financial Needs
The County of Riverside has the following future financial needs:
Total proposed bikeways 741.0 miles
Total proposed bikeways cost $269,248,092
Bicycle parking program $10,000
Wayfinding signage $2,888,000
Total capital financial need $272,222,092
Annual Class I bike path maintenance
212.7 miles, $2,127,000/year
Safe Routes to School Program $50,000/year
Grant Reporting Policies
The County of Riverside follows specific reporting guidelines for
each grant it receives.
Page 5-1
INTRODUCTION
This chapter presents the regional bikeway plan with integration of
the Coachella Valley Link (CV Link) Conceptual Master Plan and
neighborhood electric vehicle (NEV) lanes as proposed in the
Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG) NEV Plan.
Cities in the Coachella Valley have constructed a variety of bikeway
types and accommodations for golf carts. This Active
Transportation Plan (ATP or Plan) will follow the definitions of
the different types of facilities as described below.
BIKEWAY PLAN
The planning effort described in Chapter 1 yielded a
comprehensive network of bikeways of all types in the Coachella
and Palo Verde Valleys. The ATP includes all active transportation
projects that have been planned in the region or forwarded by
member jurisdictions. It is necessary to distinguish the ATP
projects that can be utilized by users throughout the region from
the projects that benefit the local transportation system. Regional
significance was approved by the Technical Planning
Subcommittee (TPS) to include active transportation project
corridors that coincide with regional arterials in the Transportation
Page 5-2
Project Prioritization Study (TPPS) or meet a minimum number of
other conditions, including traversing multiple jurisdictions,
interaction with transit lines, connections to key destinations, or
providing direct access to the CV Link or its community connector
extensions.
ATP Corridors
For the purposes of this report, ATP projects were combined into
corridors that defined a continual facility for users. Some corridors
are simply projects combined along the same street, while others
are on different streets that create a continuous linear route. It is
important to make corridors for the regional significance
assessment process, so that there aren’t gaps in a regional network,
should some ATP projects within a corridor qualify for regional
significance while others do not.
Regional Significance
The regional bikeways were prioritized from each of the local
jurisdictional bikeway plans applying the following criteria to the
ATP corridors:
Project segments along roadways identified in the CVAG
TPPS are considered regional through transitive property
Or if two of the following four criteria are met for an ATP
corridor:
Corridor traverses two or more cities in a north–south or
east–west direction
Corridor connects to SunLine Transit route stops
Corridor connects key destinations such as commercial
centers, colleges, high-density residential development,
civic centers
Corridor ties directly into the CV Link or its planned
extensions
If one ATP project within a corridor meets the regional
significance conditions, the entire corridor was considered qualified
for regional significance.
Table 5-1 lists the primary regional corridors for the Coachella
Valley that meet regional significance criteria. The table lists the
major corridors for the region, although many other qualifying
regional corridors on shorter segments do not appear on this table.
ATP Regional Network
Table 5-2 lists all of the regional bikeways and their costs in the
Coachella Valley, and the following maps illustrate the regional
bikeways.
The following tables and maps display the regional network by
facility type. They also depict the facilities that exist and those that
are planned. These facilities will have high priority in
implementation and funding. They will be eligible for regional
funds that are identified.
Please note: CV Link project costs are designated with “N/A.”
These costs are reflected in the CV Link Master Conceptual Plan
and are not included in the project costs for the regional bikeway
plan.
Table 5-1. Regional Bikeway/NEV
Street/Corridor From To Jurisdictions Traversed
CV Link Hwy 111 Visitor Center Airport Blvd (south of
Coachella)
Palm Springs, Cathedral City, Rancho Mirage, Palm Desert, Indian Wells, La
Quinta, Indio, Coachella, and Unincorporated County (East Native Lands)
Desert Hot Springs Future Regional Extension Trailhead at TwentyNine Palms
Hwy Whitewater River Unincorporated County, Desert Hot Springs, Palm Springs, and Cathedral
City
East Valley Community Connectors Washington St Whitewater River Indio, Coachella, La Quinta, and Unincorporated County
Dillon Rd Hwy 62 Ave 48 Palm Springs, Unincorporated County, Indio, Coachella, and Desert Hot
Springs
Pierson Blvd Hwy 62 Palm Dr Desert Hot Springs and Unincorporated County
Hwy. 111 (Also: N Palm Canyon, E Vista Chino,
Gene Autry Trail, Indio Blvd, Grapefruit Blvd)Hwy 111: Haugen-Lehmann Way Hwy 111: Imperial County
Line
Coachella, Unincorporated County, Palm Springs, Cathedral City, Rancho
Mirage, Palm Desert, Indian Wells, La Quinta, and Indio
Dillon Rd/Ave 20/Mountain View Rd/Varner
Rd/Ave 42 Hwy 62 Golf Center Pkwy Unincorporated County, Palm Springs, Desert Hot Springs, Cathedral City,
and Indio
Vista Chino Gene Autry Trail Date Palm Dr Cathedral City
Ramon Rd Palm Canyon Dr Washington St Palm Springs, Cathedral City, and Unincorporated County
Dinah Shore Dr Hwy 111 Gerald Ford Dr Palm Springs and Cathedral City
Fred Waring Dr/Monroe St/Ave 44 Hwy 111 Dillon Rd La Quinta, Unincorporated County, Indio, and Coachella
Ave 50 Washington St Hwy 111 La Quinta and Unincorporated County
Ave 52 Eisenhower Dr Hwy 111 Indio, Unincorporated County, La Quinta, and Coachella
Airport Blvd Monroe St Hwy 111 Unincorporated County and Coachella
Indian Ave/N. Indian Canyon Dr Pierson Blvd Ramon Rd Unincorporated County, Desert Hot Springs, and Palm Springs
Palm Dr/N. Gene Autry Trail Pierson Blvd E. Vista Chino Desert Hot Springs and Palm Springs
N. Sunrise Way E. Vista Chino E. Palm Canyon Dr Palm Springs
Date Palm Dr Varner Rd Hwy 111 Cathedral City
Portola Ave Dinah Shore Dr Hwy 111 Palm Desert
Washington St Ramon Rd Ave 52 Unincorporated County
Jefferson St Fred Waring Dr Ave 52 Indio and La Quinta
Monroe St Whitewater Wash Airport Blvd Indio, La Quinta, and Unincorporated County
Jackson St Whitewater Wash Airport Blvd Indio and Unincorporated County
Harrison St Hwy 111 Airport Blvd Coachella and Unincorporated County
Table 5-2. Regional Bikeway/NEV Costs
ID #Street/Corridor From To Jurisdictions Traversed Miles Bikeway Type Costs
CV Link Hwy 111 Visitor Center Airport Blvd (south of Coachella)
Palm Springs, Cathedral City, Palm Desert,
Indian Wells, La Quinta, Indio, Coachella,
and Unincorporated County (East Native
Lands)
N/A* (CV Link)
*Refer to CV Link Conceptual Master Plan for Details
Desert Hot Springs Future
Regional Extension Trailhead at TwentyNine Palms Hwy Whitewater River Unincorporated County, Desert Hot
Springs, Palm Springs, and Cathedral City 13.20 $18,792,682
DHS37 Mission Creek Trailhead at Twenty Nine Palms Hwy Pierson Blvd.Desert Hot Springs and Unincorporated
County 3.30 Multipurpose path/NEV path $3,997,066
PG03 Palm Dr Dillon Rd I-10 Fwy.Unincorporated County, Cathedral City, and
Desert Hot Springs 3.80 Multipurpose path/NEV path $4,602,682
PS147A Gene Autry Trail I-10 Overpass Whitewater River Palm Springs 2.10 Multipurpose path/NEV path $2,683,296
RIV138 Dillon Rd Mission Creek Palm Dr Desert Hot Springs 1.30 Multipurpose path/NEV path $1,574,602
RIV21 Mission Creek Pierson Blvd.Dillon Rd Desert Hot Springs and Unincorporated
County 2.70 Multipurpose path/NEV path $5,935,037
East Valley Community
Connectors Washington St Whitewater River Indio, Coachella, La Quinta, and
Unincorporated County $3,496,997
COA51 Ave 48 Van Buren St Dillon Rd Coachella and Unincorporated County 0.30 Multipurpose path/NEV path $363,370
COA52 Dillon Rd Ave 48 Whitewater River Coachella and Unincorporated County 1.00 Sidewalk path/NEV path $1,030,656
COA68 Ave 48 Jackson St Van Buren St Coachella 1.00 Buffered Bike/NEV lane $100,320
IN68 Ave 48 Jefferson St Jackson St Indio 3.00 Buffered Bike/NEV lane $300,960
IN68A Ave 48*Bataan St Dillon Rd Indio 0.05 Unspecified connection in CV Link
Conceptual Master Plan $3,960
LQ04 Ave 48 Washington St Jefferson St La Quinta 1.50 Bike lanes/NEV lanes $118,800
LQ55 La Quinta Evac Channel La Quinta East City Limit Ave 48 La Quinta 0.40 Multipurpose path/NEV path $556,723
LQ55A La Quinta Evac Channel Whitewater River Indio West City Limit Indio 0.80 Multipurpose path/NEV path $1,022,208
Dillon Rd Hwy 62 Ave 48 Palm Springs, Unincorporated County,
Indio, Coachella, and Desert Hot Springs $2,867,040
COA06 Dillon Rd Ave 44 Harrison Pl Coachella, Unincorporated County, and Indio 1.50 Bike lanes $118,800
DL02 Dillon Rd Palm Springs Western city limit (990 feet
west of Diablo Rd)
Eastern city limit (2660 feet east of Karen
Ave)Palm Springs and Unincorporated County 1.50 Bike lanes $118,800
RIV08 Dillon Rd Eastern Palm Springs city limit (2660 feet
east of Karen Ave)
Northern Indio city limit (7450 feet south of
Old Aqueduct Rd)
Unincorporated County and Desert Hot
Springs 26.80 Bike lanes $2,122,560
IN29 Dillon Rd Northern city limit (7450 feet south of Old
Aqueduct Rd)Ave 44 Indio and Unincorporated County 0.50 Bike Path $506,880
Pierson Blvd Hwy 62 Palm Dr Desert Hot Springs and Unincorporated
County $233,376
PIER01 Pierson Blvd SR-62 N. Indian Canyon Dr Desert Hot Springs and Unincorporated
County 2.60 Greenback sharrows (Buffered bike
lanes with road diet)$178,464
PIER03 Pierson Blvd Cholla Dr Palm Dr Desert Hot Springs 0.80 Greenback sharrows (Buffered bike
lanes with road diet)$54,912
*Planned regional active transportation project with assumed facility type for costing purposes.
Table 5-2. Regional Bikeway/NEV Costs
ID #Street/Corridor From To Jurisdictions Traversed Miles Bikeway Type Costs
Hwy. 111 (Also: N Palm Canyon,
E Vista Chino, Gene Autry Trail,
Indio Blvd, Grapefruit Blvd)
Hwy 111: Haugen-Lehmann Way Hwy 111: Imperial County Line
Coachella, Unincorporated County, Palm
Springs, Cathedral City, Rancho Mirage,
Palm Desert, Indian Wells, La Quinta, and
Indio
$2,550,768
CC11 E. Palm Canyon Dr Golf Club Dr.Cathedral Canyon Dr Cathedral City 1.30 Colored buffered bike lanes $205,920
CC13 E. Palm Canyon Dr Cathedral Canyon Dr Date Palm Dr Cathedral City 0.50 Greenback sharrows $34,320
CC14 E. Palm Canyon Dr Date Palm Dr Cathedral City Eastern city limit (80 feet East
of Buddy Rogers Ave)Cathedral City 0.40 Colored buffered bike lanes $63,360
H11102 Hwy 111 Gap between Palm Springs city limit in
northwest (3560 feet east of Tipton Rd)
Gap between Palm Springs city linit in
northwest (3270 feet north of Overture Dr)Unincorporated County 1.10 Buffered bike lanes $110,352
H11130 Indio Blvd.I-10 Indio Eastern city limit (Dillon Rd/Ave 48) Unincorporated County 1.30 Buffered bike lanes $130,416
H11131 Grapefruit Blvd.Western city limit (Dillon Rd/Ave 48)Eastern city limit (Ave 54)Coachella 4.40 Bike lanes $348,480
H11132 Hwy 111 3,520' south of Ave 54 Ave 58 Unincorporated County 1.80 Buffered bike lanes $180,576
H11133 Hwy 111 Ave 58 Parkside Dr Unincorporated County 15.60 Bike route $576,576
LQ40 Hwy 111 La Quinta Western city limit (Brad Ryland Dr)La Quinta Eastern city limit (Jefferson St)La Quinta 1.70 Bike lanes $134,640
PS176 N. Palm Canyon Palm Springs North City Limit (3270 feet
north of Overture Dr)Vista Chino Palm Springs and Unincorporated County 5.30 Bike route $195,888
PS177 N. Palm Canyon Vista Chino Alejo Rd Palm Springs 1.00 Greenback sharrows $68,640
PS242 Vista Chino N. Palm Canyon Rd N. Indian Canyon Dr Palm Springs 0.10 Colored buffered bike lanes $15,840
PS243 Vista Chino N. Indian Canyon Dr N. Sunrise Way Palm Springs 1.00 Double colored buffered bike lanes $158,400
PS244 Vista Chino N. Sunrise Way Cerritos Rd Palm Springs 0.30 Greenback sharrows $20,592
PS245 Vista Chino Cerritos Rd Gene Autry Trail Palm Springs 1.00 Bike route $36,960
PS245A Vista Chino Gene Autry Trail Palm Springs Eastern city limit Palm Springs 0.70 Bike route $25,872
PS53 Hwy 111 Haugen-Lehmann Way Gap between Palm Springs city limit in
northwest (3560 feet east of Tipton Rd)Palm Springs and Unincorporated County 3.80 Bike route $140,448
PS130 E. Palm Canyon Dr S. Palm Canyon Dr S. Indian Trail Palm Springs 0.40 Bike route $14,784
PS131 E. Palm Canyon Dr S. Indian Trail Farrell Dr Palm Springs 1.20 Bike route $44,352
PS180 N./ S. Palm Canyon Rd Alejo Rd Ramon Rd Palm Springs 1.20 Bike route $44,352
Dillon Rd/Ave 20/Mountain
View Rd/Varner Rd/Ave 42 Hwy 62 Golf Center Pkwy
Unincorporated County, Palm Springs,
Desert Hot Springs, Cathedral City, and
Indio
$3,911,266
CC24 Varner Rd Palm Dr Cathedral City Eastern city limit (6310 feet
east of Date Palm Dr)Cathedral City and Unincorporated County 4.60 Bike lanes $364,320
IN66 Varner Rd Jefferson St Thousand Palm Canyon Wash Indio 1.55 Bike path $1,571,328
RIV04 Mountain View Rd 20th Ave Varner Rd Unincorporated County and Cathedral City 1.30 Bike lanes $102,960
RIV25 Varner Rd Da Vall Dr Indio western city limit (1020 feet west of
40th Ave)Unincorporated County and Cathedral City 11.00 Bike lanes $871,200
DHS100 Ave 20 N Indian Canyon Dr Palm Dr Desert Hot Springs and Unincorporated
County 4.10 Bike lanes $324,720
IN67 Ave 42 400 Feet East of Madison St Jackson St Indio 1.93 Buffered bike lanes $193,618
PS54 Ave 20 Diablo Rd N. Indian Canyon Dr Palm Springs 2.00 Bike lanes $158,400
RIV03 Ave 20 Palm Dr Mountain View Rd Desert Hot Springs 4.10 Bike lanes $324,720
*Planned regional active transportation project with assumed facility type for costing purposes.
Table 5-2. Regional Bikeway/NEV Costs
ID #Street/Corridor From To Jurisdictions Traversed Miles Bikeway Type Costs
Ramon Rd Palm Canyon Dr Washington St Palm Springs, Cathedral City, and
Unincorporated County $1,127,174
CC28 Ramon Rd West City Limit (Landau Blvd.)East City Limit (Da Vall Dr) Cathedral City 2.00 Colored bike lanes $264,000
PS187 Ramon Rd S. Palm Canyon Dr S. Indian Canyon Dr Palm Springs 0.10 Greenback sharrows $6,864
PS188 Ramon Rd S. Indian Canyon Dr Calle Palo Fierro Palm Springs 0.20 Greenback sharrows $13,728
PS190 Ramon Rd Calle Palo Fierro S. Avenida Caballeros Palm Springs 0.30 Greenback sharrows $20,592
PS191 Ramon Rd S. Avenida Caballeros Hermosa Dr Palm Springs 1.10 Greenback sharrows $75,504
PS191B Ramon Rd Baristo Channel S. Farrell Dr Palm Springs 0.60 Greenback sharrows $41,184
PS193 Ramon Rd S. Farrell Dr El Cielo Rd Palm Springs 0.40 Greenback sharrows $27,456
PS194 Ramon Rd El Cielo Rd Gene Autry Trail Palm Springs 1.00 Greenback sharrows $68,640
PS196 Ramon Rd Gene Autry Trail San Luis Rey Rd Palm Springs and Cathedral City 0.26 Greenback sharrows $17,846
PS196A Ramon Rd Gene Autry Trail San Luis Rey Rd Palm Springs and Cathedral City 0.26 Colored bike lanes $34,320
PS197 Ramon Rd San Luis Rey Rd Crossley Rd Palm Springs and Cathedral City 0.24 Greenback sharrows $16,474
PS197A Ramon Rd San Luis Rey Rd Crossley Rd Palm Springs and Cathedral City 0.24 Colored buffered bike lanes/NEV lanes $46,886
PS56 Ramon Rd Crossley Rd Palm Springs East City Limit (Landau Blvd.)Palm Springs and Cathedral City 0.50 Greenback sharrows $34,320
PS56A Ramon Rd Crossley Rd Palm Springs East City Limit (Landau Blvd.)Palm Springs and Cathedral City 0.50 Colored buffered bike lanes $79,200
RIV15A Ramon Rd Bob Hope Dr Washington St Unincorporated County 4.80 Bike lanes $380,160
Dinah Shore Dr Hwy 111 Gerald Ford Dr Palm Springs and Cathedral City $295,680
CC08 Dinah Shore Dr Cathedral Western city limit (1450 feet west
of Whispering Palms Trail)Da Vall Dr Cathedral City 2.00 Greenback sharrows $137,280
PS128 Dinah Shore Dr Gene Autry Trail East Palm Springs City Limit (1450 feet west
of Whispering Palms Trail)Palm Springs 1.00 Colored buffered bike lanes $158,400
Fred Waring Dr/Monroe St/Ave
44 Hwy 111 Dillon Rd La Quinta, Unincorporated County, Indio,
and Coachella $926,930
IN51 Fred Waring Dr Jefferson St Monroe St Indio 1.00 Buffered bike lanes $100,320
IN52 Ave 44 Monroe St Harrison St Indio and Coachella 4.00 Buffered bike lanes $401,280
LQ43 Fred Waring Dr Washington St Adam St La Quinta 1.00 Bike lanes $79,200
LQ44 Fred Waring Dr (Southbound
Only)Adam St Dune Palms Rd La Quinta and Unincorporated County 0.50 Buffered bike lanes/NEV lanes $50,160
LQ45 Fred Waring Dr Dune Palms Rd Jefferson St La Quinta and Unincorporated County 0.50 Bike lanes $39,600
IN52A Ave 45 Monroe St Harrison St Indio and Coachella 3.24 Bike lanes $256,370
Ave 50 Washington St Hwy 111 La Quinta and Unincorporated County $1,450,944
IN65 Ave 50 Jefferson St Madison St La Quinta 1.00 Bike lanes/NEV lanes $79,200
IN65A Ave 50 Jefferson St Madison St La Quinta 1.00 Multipurpose Path $1,292,544
IN65C Ave 50 Jefferson St Indio Eastern city limit (1010 feet east of
Jackson St)Unincorporated County 1.00 Bike Lanes $79,200
Ave 52 Eisenhower Dr Hwy 111 Indio, Unincorporated County, La Quinta,
and Coachella $3,020,688
COA10 Ave 52 Coachella Western city limit (Calhoun St)Harrison St Coachella 1.50 Bike lanes $118,800
IN85 Ave 52 Monroe St Jackson St Indio and Unincorporated County 1.00 Bike lanes $79,200
LQ35 Ave 52 Jefferson St Monroe St La Quinta 2.00 Bike lanes/NEV lanes $158,400
LQ35A Ave 52 Jefferson St Monroe St La Quinta 2.00 Multipurpose path $2,585,088
LQ35B Ave 52 Madison St Monroe St Indio 1.00 Bike lane $79,200
Airport Blvd Monroe St Hwy 111 Unincorporated County and Coachella $396,000
RIV78 Airport Blvd Monroe St Polk St Unincorporated County and Coachella 5.00 Bike lanes $396,000
*Planned regional active transportation project with assumed facility type for costing purposes.
Table 5-2. Regional Bikeway/NEV Costs
ID #Street/Corridor From To Jurisdictions Traversed Miles Bikeway Type Costs
Indian Ave/N. Indian Canyon Dr Pierson Blvd Ramon Rd Unincorporated County, Desert Hot
Springs, and Palm Springs $549,120
PS156 Indian Canyon Dr Sunrise Pkwy.San Rafael Dr Palm Springs 0.70 Bike lanes (with road diet)$55,440
PS157 Indian Canyon Dr San Rafael Dr E. Alejo Rd Palm Springs 2.10 Greenback sharrows $144,144
PS163 Indian Canyon Dr E. Alejo Rd E. Camino Parocela Palm Springs 1.10 Bike route $40,656
RIV05 Indian Ave/ N. Indian Canyon Dr Pierson Blvd.I-10 Fwy.Unincorporated County, Desert Hot Springs,
and Palm Springs 3.90 Bike lanes $308,880
Palm Dr/N. Gene Autry Trail Pierson Blvd E. Vista Chino Desert Hot Springs and Palm Springs $541,728
DHS11 Palm Dr Cahuilla Ave Camino Aventura Desert Hot Springs 1.80 Colored bike lanes $237,600
DHS12 Palm Dr Mission Lakes Blvd Cahuilla Ave Desert Hot Springs 1.20 Greenback sharrows $82,368
PS147 Gene Autry Trail I-10 E. Via Escuela Palm Springs 2.10 Buffered bike lanes (add 4' buffer)$210,672
PS148 Gene Autry Trail E. Via Escuela E. Vista Chino Palm Springs 0.30 Bike route $11,088
N. Sunrise Way E. Vista Chino E. Palm Canyon Dr Palm Springs $498,960
PS213 Sunrise Way E. Vista Chino E. Tamarisk Rd Palm Springs 0.80 Colored buffered bike lanes $126,720
PS214 Sunrise Way E. Tamarisk Rd E. Alejo Rd Palm Springs 0.30 Colored bike lanes $39,600
PS215 Sunrise Way E. Alejo Rd E. Palm Canyon Dr Palm Springs 2.10 Colored buffered bike lanes $332,640
Date Palm Dr Varner Rd Hwy 111 Cathedral City $581,856
CC09 Date Palm Dr Perez Rd Hwy 111 Cathedral City 0.30 Buffered bike lanes $30,096
CC15 Date Palm Dr Varner Rd Ramon Rd Cathedral City 3.20 Buffered bike lanes (would require a
road diet where 6 lanes)$321,024
CC16 Date Palm Dr Ramon Rd 35th Ave Cathedral City 1.40 Buffered bike lanes (would require a
road diet where 6 lanes)/NEV $140,448
CC17 Date Palm Dr 35th Ave Perez Rd Cathedral City 0.90 Buffered bike lanes (would require a
road diet where 6 lanes)/NEV lanes $90,288
Portola Ave Dinah Shore Dr Hwy 111 Palm Desert $285,120
PD55 Portola Ave Magnesia Falls Dr Hwy 111 Palm Desert 1.80 Colored buffered bike lanes (with road
diet)$285,120
Washington St Ramon Rd Ave 52 Unincorporated County $411,840
WR01 Ramon Rd/Washington St Ramon Rd Palm Desert city limit (580 feet North of
Country Club Dr)Unincorporated County 5.20 Bike lanes $411,840
Jefferson St Fred Waring Dr Ave 52 Indio and La Quinta $401,280
JF01 Jefferson St Indio Blvd Ave 50 Indio and La Quinta 4.00 Buffered bike lanes $401,280
Monroe St Whitewater Wash Airport Blvd Indio, La Quinta, and Unincorporated
County $998,712
IN41 Monroe St Fred Waring Dr Ave 52 Indio 3.95 Bike lanes $312,840
LQ52 Monroe St Ave 54 Mountain View Ln.La Quinta and Unincorporated County 0.50 Bike lanes/NEV lanes $39,600
LQ52A Monroe St Ave 54 Mountain View Ln.La Quinta and Unincorporated County 0.50 Multipurpose path $646,272
Jackson St Whitewater Wash Airport Blvd Indio and Unincorporated County $358,776
IN44 Jackson St Dr Carreon Blvd Ave 50 Indio 1.53 Bike lanes $121,176
IN46 Jackson St Ave 50 Ave 52 Indio and Unincorporated County 1.00 Bike lanes $79,200
JK06 Jackson St Ave 52 Airport Blvd Unincorporated County 2.00 Bike lanes $158,400
Harrison St Hwy 111 Airport Blvd Coachella and Unincorporated County $257,664
COA08 Harrison St Hwy 111 Ave 54 Coachella 2.20 Buffered bike lanes/NEV lanes $220,704
HR02 Harrison St Ave 54 Airport Blvd.Unincorporated County 1.00 Bike route $36,960
*Planned regional active transportation project with assumed facility type for costing purposes.
Table 5-2. Regional Bikeway/NEV Costs
ID #Street/Corridor From To Jurisdictions Traversed Miles Bikeway Type Costs
Other Connectors $13,196,522
AMCC Air Museum Community
Connector: Diamond Rd San Joaquin Rd Whitewater River Cathedral City 0.25 Multipurpose Path $300,960
SJDCC Air Museum Community
Connector: San Joaquin Rd Diamond Rd Southern end of golf course Cathedral City 1.00 Bike lanes $79,200
PS155 Amtrak Station Community
Connector: Indian Canyon Dr I-10 Amtrak Station Palm Springs 0.80 Buffered bike lanes (add 4' buffer)$80,256
PS155A Amtrak Station Community
Connector: Indian Canyon Dr Amtrak Station Whitewater River Palm Springs 1.40 Buffered bike lanes (add 4' buffer)$140,448
PS155B Amtrak Station Community
Connector: Indian Canyon Dr Whitewater River Sunrise Pkwy Palm Springs 0.02 Buffered bike lanes (add 4' buffer)$2,006
COA30 Ave 50-Polo Grounds
Community Connector: Ave 50
Coachella Western city limit (1010 feet east
of Jackson St)Whitewater River Coachella 2.60 Bike lanes $205,920
IN65B Ave 50-Polo Grounds
Community Connector: Ave 50 Polo Grounds Indio Eastern city limit (1010 feet east of
Jackson St)Indio 3.30 Buffered bike lanes $331,056
LECC1 Ave 52-La Entrada Community
Connector: Ave 52 Whitewater River SR-86S Coachella 0.20 Bike lanes $15,840
LECC2 Ave 52-La Entrada Community
Connector: Ave 52*SR-86S Eastern end road Coachella 0.19 Unspecified connection in CV Link
Conceptual Master Plan $15,000
LECC3 Ave 52-La Entrada Community
Connector: Unpaved Road*Ave 52 Future extension to La Entrada Coachella 4.73 Unspecified connection in CV Link
Conceptual Master Plan $375,000
CGCPCC2 Casino Loop Community
Connector: Golf Center Pkwy.*I-10 Whitewater River Indio 0.17 14' shared use path on one side (CV
Link)$13,464
DRCC Casino Loop Community
Connector: Dillon Rd*Harrison Pl Whitewater River Coachella 0.30 Bike lanes (CV Link)$23,760
GCPCC Casino Loop Community
Connector: Golf Center Pkwy.*Indio Springs Dr I-10 Indio 0.20 Bike lanes/NEV lanes (CV Link)$15,840
ISDCC Casino Loop Community
Connector: Indio Springs Dr*Golf Center Pkwy.Access Road along I-10 Indio 0.80
Multipurpose Path (14' shared-use
path on one side) Note: Proposed
bikeway class for the Casino Loop
Community Connector was listed in
the CV Link Conceptual Master Plan.
This is subject to a feasibility study, as
explained in the CV Link Conceptual
Master Plan.
$63,360
*Planned regional active transportation project with assumed facility type for costing purposes.
Table 5-2. Regional Bikeway/NEV Costs
ID #Street/Corridor From To Jurisdictions Traversed Miles Bikeway Type Costs
ISDCC2
Casino Loop Community
Connector: Access Road Along I-
10*
Indio Springs Dr Indio East City Limit Indio 0.93
Multipurpose Path (14' shared-use
path on one side) Note: Proposed
bikeway class for the Casino Loop
Community Connector was listed in
the CV Link Conceptual Master Plan.
This is subject to a feasibility study, as
explained in the CV Link Conceptual
Master Plan.
$73,656
ISDCC3
Casino Loop Community
Connector: Access Road Along
East Side of Spotlight 29 Casino*
Just south of I-10 Harrison Pl Coachella and Unincorporated County 1.10
Multipurpose Path (14' shared-use
path on one side) NOTE: Proposed
bikeway class for the Casino Loop
Community Connector was listed in
the CV Link Conceptual Master Plan.
This is subject to a feasibility study, as
explained in the CV Link Conceptual
Master Plan.
$87,120
ISDCC4 Casino Loop Community
Connector: Harrison Pl
Access road along east side of Spotlight 29
Casino Dillon Rd Coachella 0.30
Multipurpose Path (14' shared-use
path on one side) NOTE: Proposed
bikeway class for the Casino Loop
Community Connector was listed in
the CV Link Conceptual Master Plan.
This is subject to a feasibility study, as
explained in the CV Link Conceptual
Master Plan.
$23,760
RCBCC
Casino Loop Community
Connector: Bridge Access Across
I-10*
Vista del Norte Unpaved path along southern side of I-10 Unincorporated County 0.08 Multipurpose Path (14' shared-use
path on one side) (CV Link)$6,000
RCCCC
Casino Loop Community
Connector: Access Road Along I-
10*
County/City limit Vista del Norte Unincorporated County 0.26 Multipurpose Path (14' shared-use
path on one side) (CV Link)$20,625
RCUCC
Casino Loop Community
Connector: Unpaved path along
southern side of I-10*
Bridge Access 0.2 mi along path Unincorporated County 0.33 Multipurpose Path (14' shared-use
path on one side) (CV Link)$26,250
CCECC
Cathedral Canyon Cove
Community Connector:
Cathedral Canyon Channel East*
Whitewater River 2 mi. southwest along Cathedral Canyon
Channel East Cathedral City 2.00 Unspecified connection in CV Link
Conceptual Master Plan $158,400
COA11 Coachella City Center
Community Connector: Ave 52 Tripoli Way Tyler St Coachella 0.64 Bike lanes/NEV lanes $50,688
COA12 Coachella City Center
Community Connector: Ave 52 Tyler St Whitewater River Coachella 1.20 Bike lanes $95,040
COACC Coachella City Center
Community Connector: Ave 52*Harrison St Tripoli Way Coachella 0.13 Unspecified connection in CV Link
Conceptual Master Plan $10,425
RIV90A
College of the Desert East Valley
Campus Community Connector:
Ave 62
Whitewater River Buchanan St Unincorporated County 1.50 Bike path $1,476,288
*Planned regional active transportation project with assumed facility type for costing purposes.
Table 5-2. Regional Bikeway/NEV Costs
ID #Street/Corridor From To Jurisdictions Traversed Miles Bikeway Type Costs
DCCC Deep Canyon Road Community
Connector: Deep Canyon Rd*Whitewater River Magnesia Falls Dr Palm Desert 0.98
On-street LSEV/Bike Lanes (Note:
Proposed bikeway class for the Deep
Canyon Road Community Connector
was listed in the CV Link Conceptual
Master Plan. This is subject to a
feasibility study, as explained in the
CV Link Conceptual Master Plan.)
$77,700
PS191A
Downtown Palm Springs
Community Connector: Ramon
Rd
Hermosa Dr Baristo Channel Palm Springs 0.20 Greenback sharrows $13,728
FPCC
Freedom Park Community
Connector: Freedom Park
Community Connector (optional
connector for Indian Wells)*
Whitewater River Unspecified Indian Wells 0.95 Unspecified connection in CV Link
Conceptual Master Plan $75,000
IW21 Gerald Ford School Community
Connector: Warner Trail Fred Waring Dr Miles Ave Indian Wells 0.40 Bike route $14,784
LCCC Lake Cahuilla Community
Connector: Ave 58*Madison St Lake Cahuilla La Quinta 1.10 Unspecified connection in CV Link
Conceptual Master Plan $87,120
LQ42 Lake Cahuilla Community
Connector: Madison St Ave 50 Entrance to Polo Grounds at south terminus
of trail La Quinta 0.50 Multipurpose Path $646,272
LQ42A Lake Cahuilla Community
Connector: Madison St Ave 50 Entrance to Polo Grounds at south terminus
of trail La Quinta 0.50 Bike lanes/NEV lanes $39,600
MCC Lake Cahuilla Community
Connector: Madison St*Ave 52 Ave 58 La Quinta 3.00 Unspecified connection in CV Link
Conceptual Master Plan $237,600
CCCC
Madison-Polo Grounds
Community Connector: Madison
St.*
Whitewater River Miles Ave Indio 1.74 Unspecified connection in CV Link
Conceptual Master Plan $138,030
IN77
Madison-Polo Grounds
Community Connector: Madison
St
Miles St Ave 48 Indio 1.55 Bike lanes $122,760
LQ42C
Madison-Polo Grounds
Community Connector: Madison
St
Ave 48 Ave 51/Polo Grounds Indio 1.50 Buffered bike lanes $150,480
NICC North Indio Community
Connector: Jackson St Pacific Indio Shopping Center I-10 Indio 0.10 Bike lanes $7,920
NICC2 North Indio Community
Connector: Jackson St*I-10 Whitewater River Indio 0.46 Unspecified connection in CV Link
Conceptual Master Plan $36,750
PS144A
Palm Springs High School
Community Connector: Farrell
Dr
Baristo Rd E Ramon Rd Palm Springs 0.30 Bike route $11,088
PS145
Palm Springs High School
Community Connector: Farrell
Dr
E. Ramon Rd Tahquitz Creek Trail Palm Springs 0.20 Double colored buffered bike lanes
(with road diet)$31,680
PD57 Palm Valley Channel Community
Connector : Palm Valley Channel Painters Path Edgehill Dr Palm Desert 0.65 Multipurpose Path/Golf Cart Path $867,610
PD57A Palm Valley Channel Community
Connector : Palm Valley Channel Edgehill Dr Tierra del Oro Palm Desert 0.67 Multipurpose Path/Golf Cart Path $894,305
*Planned regional active transportation project with assumed facility type for costing purposes.
Table 5-2. Regional Bikeway/NEV Costs
ID #Street/Corridor From To Jurisdictions Traversed Miles Bikeway Type Costs
PD68 Palm Valley Channel Community
Connector : Painters Path Bridge over Palm Valley Channel Mike Schuler Trail/Bump'n Grind Trailhead Palm Desert 0.40 Multipurpose Path/Golf Cart Path $533,914
PPCC Palm Valley Channel Community
Connector : Painters Path*Palm Valley Channel El Paseo Palm Desert 0.18 Unspecified connection in CV Link
Conceptual Master Plan $14,250
PVCC
Palm Valley Channel Community
Connector : Palm Valley
Channel*
Parkview Dr Painters Path (approximate)Palm Desert 0.62 Unspecified connection in CV Link
Conceptual Master Plan $1,181,768
SCCC
Sun City Shadow Hills
Community Connector:
Channel*
Whitewater River Extends north (not enough information in CV
Conceptual Master Plan)Indio 1.17 Unspecified connection in CV Link
Conceptual Master Plan $2,023,760
TGCC
Tennis Garden Community
Connector: Tennis Garden
Community Connector (optional
connector for Indian Wells)*
Tennis Garden Miles Ave Indian Wells 0.21 Unspecified connection in CV Link
Conceptual Master Plan $402,304
RIV102A Thermal Town Center
Community Connector: Polk St Airport Blvd.Center St Unincorporated County 0.30 Multipurpose path/NEV path $363,370
RIV102B Thermal Town Center
Community Connector: Polk St Center St Ave 70 Unincorporated County 6.70 Multipurpose path/NEV path $530,640
RIV139 Thermal Town Center
Community Connector: Olive St Center St South of Church St Unincorporated County 0.10 Bike lane/NEV lane $7,920
RIV140 Thermal Town Center
Community Connector: Olive St South of Church St Thermal Ball Park Unincorporated County 0.10 Bike route $3,696
RIV202
Thermal Town Center
Community Connector: Center
St
Polk St Olive St Unincorporated County 0.10 Bike lanes $7,920
RIV78D
Thermal Town Center
Community Connector: Airport
Blvd
Polk St Whitewater River Unincorporated County 0.50 Multipurpose path/NEV path $605,616
DHS09 Worsley Road Community
Connector: Worsley Rd
Desert Hot Springs Northern city limit (5110
feet north of Mission Creek Rd)
Desert Hot Springs Southern city limit
(Pierson Blvd)Desert Hot Springs 2.20 Bike lanes $174,240
RIV200 Worsley Road Community
Connector: Ave 20 Worsley Rd Wall Rd Unincorporated County 0.78 Bike lanes $61,776
RIV201 Worsley Road Community
Connector: Worsley Rd Ave 20 Pierson Blvd.Unincorporated County 1.80 Bike lanes $142,560
Other Notable Street Corridors $92,535,332
RIV62 1000 Palms Canyon Rd Dillon Rd Ramon Rd Unincorporated County 4.70 Bike lanes $372,240
COA15 1st St Harrison St Grapefruit Blvd.Coachella 0.30 Bike route $11,088
DHS16 2 Bunch Palms Trail West Dr Miracle Hill Rd Desert Hot Springs 1.60 Buffered bike lanes $160,512
DHS17 2 Bunch Palms Trail Little Morongo Rd West Dr Desert Hot Springs 1.00 Bike lanes $79,200
CC22 30th Ave Santoro Dr Da Vall Dr Cathedral City 0.50 Bike lanes $39,600
LQ48 Airport Blvd Madison St Monroe St La Quinta 1.00 Multipurpose path $1,292,544
LQ48A Airport Blvd Madison St Monroe St La Quinta 1.00 Bike lanes/NEV lanes $79,200
PS70 Amado Rd N. Belardo Rd N. Calle El Segundo Palm Springs 0.40 Colored bike lanes $52,800
IN69 Arabia St Hwy 111 Ave 48 Indio 1.00 Bike route $36,960
*Planned regional active transportation project with assumed facility type for costing purposes.
Table 5-2. Regional Bikeway/NEV Costs
ID #Street/Corridor From To Jurisdictions Traversed Miles Bikeway Type Costs
PS76 Araby Rd E. Palm Canyon Dr Murray Canyon Dr Palm Springs 0.40 Bike route $14,784
PS78 Arenas Rd S. Palm Canyon Dr S. Indian Canyon Dr Palm Springs 0.10 Colored bike lanes $13,200
PS77 Arenas Rd S. Cahuilla Rd S. Palm Canyon Dr Palm Springs 0.10 Buffered bike lanes (with road diet)$10,032
RIV200A Ave 20 Wall Rd Diablo Rd Unincorporated County 0.30 Bike lanes $23,760
IN64 Ave 40/ Fifties Way Varner Rd Monroe St Indio and Unincorporated County 3.50 Buffered bike lanes $351,120
COA31 Ave 44 Harrison St Dillon Rd Coachella 1.00 Bike lanes $79,200
IN81 Ave 45/ Van Buren St/ Cabazon
Rd Golf Center Pkwy.Dillon Rd Indio and Unincorporated County 1.90 Bike route $70,224
COA45 Ave 48 Tyler St Coachella Canal Coachella 1.60 Bike lanes $126,720
COA29 Ave 49 Jackson St Van Buren St Coachella 1.00 Bike lanes $79,200
LQ30 Ave 50 Washington St 1240 feet west of Park Ave La Quinta 0.60 Bike lanes $47,520
LQ46 Ave 50 Eisenhower Dr Washington St La Quinta 0.80 Bike route $29,568
RIV83 Ave 54 Monroe St Van Buren St Unincorporated County 2.00 Bike lanes $158,400
RIV84 Ave 54 Harrison St Tyler St Unincorporated County and Coachella 1.30 Bike path $1,279,450
COA37 Ave 54 Van Buren St Whitewater River Coachella and Unincorporated County 3.20 Bike lanes $253,440
LQ47 Ave 54 Jefferson St Monroe St La Quinta 2.00 Bike lanes/NEV lanes $158,400
LQ47A Ave 54 Jefferson St Monroe St La Quinta 2.00 Multipurpose path $2,585,088
RIV34 Ave 58 Monroe St to Harrison St and Fillmore St to Buchanan St Unincorporated County 4.90 Bike lanes $388,080
RIV35 Ave 58 SR-86 Buchanan St Unincorporated County 1.60 Bike path $1,574,707
LQ49 Ave 58 Almonte Monroe St La Quinta 0.30 Bike lanes/NEV lanes $23,760
LQ49A Ave 58 Almonte Monroe St La Quinta 0.30 Multipurpose path $387,763
RIV36 Ave 60 La Quinta city limit (1320 feet west of
Monroe St)Lincoln St Unincorporated County 8.60 Bike lanes $681,120
RIV37 Ave 60 Polk St to Whitewater River Pierce to Lincoln St Unincorporated County 3.10 Bike path $3,050,995
RIV89 Ave 62 Monroe St Coachella Canal Unincorporated County 11.00 Bike lanes $871,200
RIV90 Ave 62 Monroe St Whitewater River Unincorporated County 6.40 Bike path $6,298,829
RIV90B Ave 62 Buchanan St Coachella Canal Unincorporated County 3.00 Bike path $2,952,576
LQ51 Ave 62 Madison St Monroe St La Quinta and Unincorporated County 1.00 Bike lanes/NEV lanes $79,200
LQ51A Ave 62 Madison St Monroe St La Quinta and Unincorporated County 1.00 Multipurpose path $1,292,544
PS84 Avenida Caballeros W. Ramon Rd E. Tahquitz Canyon Way Palm Springs 0.50 Buffered bike lanes (with road diet)$50,160
PS85 Avenida Caballeros E. Tahquitz Canyon Way E. Amado Rd Palm Springs 0.20 Buffered bike lanes/NEV lanes (with
road diet)$20,064
PS86 Avenida Caballeros E. Amado Rd E. Tachevah Dr Palm Springs 0.80 Buffered bike lanes (with road diet)$80,256
PS88 Avenida Caballeros E. Tachevah Dr E. Paseo El Mirador Palm Springs 0.20 Colored buffered bike lanes (with road
diet)$31,680
PS89 Avenida Caballeros E. Paseo El Mirador E. San Rafael Dr Palm Springs 1.30 Buffered bike lanes (with road diet)$130,416
COA25 Bagdad Ave Douma St Grapefruit Blvd.Coachella 1.10 Bike route $40,656
PS91 Baristo Rd El Cielo Rd Sunrise Way Palm Springs 1.00 Colored buffered bike lanes (with road
diet)$158,400
PS91A Baristo Rd Sunrise Way Ave. Caballeros Palm Springs 0.50 Bike lanes (with road diet)$39,600
PS92 Barona Rd E. Palm Canyon Dr Sandcliff Rd Palm Springs 0.10 Bike route $3,696
PS93 Barona Rd Sandcliff Rd South end Palm Springs 0.50 Bike route $18,480
PS100 Belardo Rd E. Sunny Dunes Rd S. Palm Canyon Dr Palm Springs 0.80 Colored buffered bike lanes $126,720
RIV06 Bob Hope Dr Varner Rd Ramon Rd Unincorporated County and Cathedral City 0.50 Buffered bike lanes $50,160
RM130 Bob Hope Dr Ramon Rd Hwy 111 Rancho Mirage and Unincorporated County 5.55 Bike lanes (partial)$219,644
*Planned regional active transportation project with assumed facility type for costing purposes.
Table 5-2. Regional Bikeway/NEV Costs
ID #Street/Corridor From To Jurisdictions Traversed Miles Bikeway Type Costs
RM131 Bob Hope Dr Gerald Ford Dr Frank Sinatra Dr Rancho Mirage 1.02 Bike path $1,090,941
RM132 Bob Hope Dr Country Club Dr Torremolinos Dr Rancho Mirage 1.19 Bike route $44,078
COA38A Calhoun St San Mateo Ave South City Limit Coachella 0.50 Bike lanes $39,600
IN83 Calhoun St Hwy 111 Doctor Carreon Blvd. Indio 0.50 Buffered bike lanes $50,160
LQ27 Calle Tampico Eisenhower Dr Washington St La Quinta 0.80 Bike lanes/NEV lanes $63,360
LQ28 Calle Tampico Washington St Calle Quito La Quinta 0.10 Bike lanes $7,920
LQ29 Calle Tampico Calle Quito Calle Rondo La Quinta 0.20 Bike lanes/NEV lanes $15,840
PS114 Camino Real S. Riverside Dr San Lorenzo Rd Palm Springs 0.10 Greenback sharrows $6,864
PS115 Camino Real San Lorenzo Rd E. Mesquite Ave Palm Springs 0.10 Greenback sharrows $6,864
PS117 Camino Real Calle Palo Fierro E. Palm Canyon Dr Palm Springs 0.40 Greenback sharrows $27,456
PS118 Camino Real E. Palm Canyon Dr E. La Verne Way Palm Springs 0.50 Buffered bike lanes (with road diet)$50,160
CC19 Cathedral Canyon Dr Ramon Rd Dinah Shore Cathedral City 1.00 Bike lanes/NEV lanes $79,200
CC21 Cathedral Canyon Dr Canyon Shores Dr E. Palm Canyon Dr /Hwy 111 Cathedral City 0.60 Bike path/NEV path $1,039,104
CC20 Cathedral Canyon Dr Dinah Shore Dr Whitewater River Cathedral City 0.80 Multipurpose path/NEV path $1,022,208
IN49 Civic Center Dr Oasis St Indio Blvd.Indio 0.40 Bike route $14,784
PS122 Civic Dr E. Tahquitz Canyon Way E. Baristo Rd Palm Springs 0.30 Bike route $11,088
COA49 Connector to I-10 Ave 50 I-10 Coachella 1.10 Bike lanes $87,120
IW17 Cook St Hwy 111 Fairway Dr Indian Wells 0.50 Bike lanes/NEV lanes $39,600
RM133 Country Club Dr Hwy 111 Monterey Ave Rancho Mirage 2.56 Bike lanes (partial)$101,242
PS124 Crossley Rd E. Ramon Rd 34th Ave Palm Springs 1.10 Buffered bike lanes (with road diet)$110,352
CC30 Da Vall Dr Varner Rd.Dinah Shore Dr Cathedral City and Unincorporated County 3.30 Bike lanes $261,360
RM33 Da Vall Dr Ramon Rd Dinah Shore Dr Cathedral City 1.00 Bike lanes $79,200
RM134 DaVall Dr 30th Ave Frank Sinatra Dr Rancho Mirage and Cathedral City 4.00 Bike lanes (partial)$158,404
COA33 Dillon Rd Whitewater River Ave 48 Coachella 1.40 Bike lanes $110,880
RM135 Dinah Shore Dr Plumley Rd Monterey Ave Rancho Mirage and Unincorporated County 3.57 Bike lanes (partial)$141,534
IN58 Doctor Carreon Blvd.Hwy 111 Jackson St Indio 1.50 Bike lanes $118,800
IN54 Dune Palms Rd Miles Ave Westward Ho Dr La Quinta 0.50 Bike lanes/NEV lanes $39,600
IN54A Dune Palms Rd Miles Ave Westward Ho Dr Indio 0.50 Bike lanes $39,600
COA16 East side of Shady Ln.9th St Ave 54 Coachella 1.50 Bike path $1,476,288
LQ32 Eisenhower Dr Calle Tampico Calle Sinaloa La Quinta 0.40 Bike route $14,784
LQ33 Eisenhower Dr Washington St Avenue 50 La Quinta 1.00 Bike route $36,960
PD77 Eldorado West Bike Path Fred Waring Dr Hovley Lane East Palm Desert 1.45 Bike path/Golf Cart Path $2,750,035
PS145A Farrell Dr Tahquitz Creek Trail E. Palm Canyon Dr Palm Springs 0.80 Double colored buffered bike lanes
(with road diet)$126,720
PS142 Farrell Dr E. Joyce Rd E. Racquet Club Dr Palm Springs 0.50 Bike route $18,480
PS143 Farrell Dr E. Racquet Club Dr E. Vista Chino Palm Springs 0.50 Bike route $18,480
PS144 Farrell Dr E. Tahquitz Canyon Way Baristo Rd Palm Springs 0.30 Bike route $11,088
RM136 Frank Sinatra Dr Hwy 111 Monterey Ave Rancho Mirage 3.25 Bike lanes (partial)$128,806
PS149 Gene Autry Trail E. Vista Chino Palm Springs Air Museum Palm Springs 0.80 Bike path $805,167
PS149A Gene Autry Trail Palm Springs Air Museum 0.6 mi south of Gene Autry Trail/south end
of golf course Palm Springs 0.60 Bike path $610,184
PS149B Gene Autry Trail 0.6 mi south of Gene Autry Trail/south end
of golf course Tahquitz Creek Channel Palm Springs 1.80 Bike path $1,786,281
PS149C Gene Autry Trail Tahquitz Creek Channel 600' south of Tahquitz Creek Channel Palm Springs 0.10 Bike path $119,698
PS149D Gene Autry Trail 600' south of Tahquitz Creek Channel E. Palm Canyon Dr Palm Springs 0.50 Bike path $528,046
PS251 Gene Autry Trail E. Vista Chino Palm Springs Air Museum Palm Springs 0.80 Bike route $29,568
*Planned regional active transportation project with assumed facility type for costing purposes.
Table 5-2. Regional Bikeway/NEV Costs
ID #Street/Corridor From To Jurisdictions Traversed Miles Bikeway Type Costs
PS252 Gene Autry Trail Palm Springs Air Museum 0.6 mi south of Gene Autry Trail/south end
of golf course Palm Springs 36.00 Bike route $1,330,560
PS253 Gene Autry Trail 0.6 mi south of Gene Autry Trail/south end
of golf course Tahquitz Creek Channel Palm Springs 1.80 Bike route $66,528
PS254 Gene Autry Trail Tahquitz Creek Channel 600' south of Tahquitz Creek Channel Palm Springs 0.10 Bike route $3,696
PS255 Gene Autry Trail 600' south of Tahquitz Creek Channel E. Palm Canyon Dr Palm Springs 0.50 Bike route $18,480
CC29 Gerald Ford Dr Date Palm Dr Cathedral City Eastern city limit (Plumley Rd)Cathedral City 0.50 Colored bike lanes $66,000
PD62 Gerald Ford Dr Cook St Frank Sinatra Dr Palm Desert 1.00 Bike lanes $79,200
RM137 Gerald Ford Dr Plumley Rd Monterey Ave Rancho Mirage and Cathedral City 3.53 Bike lanes (partial)$139,633
IN70 Golf Center Pkwy.Ave 42 Ave 44 Indio 1.00 Bike lanes $79,200
IN71 Golf Center Pkwy.Ave 44 Indio Springs Dr Indio 0.10 Bike lanes/NEV lanes $7,920
DHS14 Hacienda Ave Cholla Dr West Dr Desert Hot Springs 0.30 Buffered bike lanes $30,096
DHS15 Hacienda Ave Agua Cayendo Rd Long Canyon Rd Desert Hot Springs 1.50 Bike lanes $118,800
RIV65 Harrison St Airport Blvd.70th Ave Unincorporated County 18.20 Bike route $672,672
COA18 Hwy 111 Ave 54 3,520' south of Ave 54 (South City Limit)Coachella 0.70 Buffered bike lanes $70,224
RIV12 Hwy 111*Future Extension to Mecca-North Shore Salton Sea State Park Unincorporated County 17.99 Unspecified connection in CV Link
Conceptual Master Plan $17,708,000
DHS07 Indian Canyon Dr Desert Hot Springs Northern city limit (5990
feet north of Mission Lakes Blvd)Pierson Blvd.Desert Hot Springs 2.20 Bike lanes $174,240
IN34 Indio Blvd.Jefferson St Dillon Rd Indio and Unincorporated County 5.10 Bike lanes $403,920
RIV66 Jackson St Ave 52 to Ave 60 Ave 64 to Ave 66 Unincorporated County 5.00 Bike lanes $396,000
COA100 Jackson St Ave 48 Ave 49 Coachella 0.50 Bike lanes $39,600
IN42 Jackson St Desert Trace Way Pacific Indio Shopping Center Indio 0.65 Bike lanes $51,480
IN37 Jefferson St Ave 38 Varner Rd Indio 1.42 Bike path $1,439,539
RM138 Joshua Rd Magnesia Falls Dr End of Joshua Rd Rancho Mirage and Palm Desert 0.49 Bike route $18,176
PS166 Kirk Douglas Way/ Airport E. Tahquitz Canyon Way E. Ramon Rd Palm Springs 1.60 Bike route $59,136
CC23 Landau Blvd.Vista Chino Mihalyo Rd Cathedral City 1.70 Bike lanes $134,640
RIV70 Little Morongo Rd Dillon Rd Ave 20 Desert Hot Springs 1.70 Bike lanes $134,640
DHS29 Little Morongo Rd Augusta Ave Pierson Blvd.Desert Hot Springs and Unincorporated
County 1.70 Bike route $62,832
CC25 Long Canyon Path Cathedral City Northern city limit (1350 feet
north of Varner Rd)I-10 parallel path Cathedral City 1.80 Bike path $1,824,768
RIV71 Long Canyon Rd Desert Hot Springs city limit (1320 feet north
of Camino Zangri)Dillon Rd Unincorporated County 1.50 Bike lanes $118,800
RIV20 Long Canyon Wash Joshua Tree National Park Cathedral City city limit (1680 feet south of
Moon Ranch Rd)Unincorporated County 5.20 Bike path $5,117,798
RM144 Magnesia Falls Dr Gardess Rd Joshua Rd Rancho Mirage 0.99 Bike route $36,661
CC32 McCallum Way Avenida Los Ninos DaVall Dr Cathedral City 1.10 Bike lanes $87,120
PS168 Mesquite Ave West End S. Belardo Rd Palm Springs 0.30 Bike route $11,088
PS169 Mesquite Ave S. Belardo Rd S. Palm Canyon Dr Palm Springs 0.10 Bike route $3,696
PS170 Mesquite Ave S. Palm Canyon Dr S. Sunrise Way Palm Springs 1.00 Bike route $36,960
PS172 Mesquite Ave S. Sunrise Way S. Farrell Dr Palm Springs 0.60 Double colored buffered bike lanes
(with road diet)$95,040
PS173 Mesquite Ave El Cielo Rd S. Gene Autry Trail Palm Springs 1.10 Greenback sharrows $75,504
PD56 Mid-Valley Bike Path (SPRR
corridor)
Palm Desert Western city limit (3250 feet
nrothwest of Monterey Ave)
Palm Desert Eastern city limit (Washington
St)Palm Desert and Unincorporated County 7.00 Bike path $7,451,136
IN31 Miles Ave Clinton St Monroe St Indio 0.50 Buffered bike lanes $50,160
IN32 Miles Ave Dune Palms Clinton St Indio 2.00 Buffered bike lanes $200,640
IN72 Miles Ave Monroe St Oasis St Indio 0.80 Bike route $29,568
*Planned regional active transportation project with assumed facility type for costing purposes.
Table 5-2. Regional Bikeway/NEV Costs
ID #Street/Corridor From To Jurisdictions Traversed Miles Bikeway Type Costs
LQ36 Miles Ave Dune Palms Rd Jefferson St La Quinta 0.50 Bike lanes/NEV lanes $39,600
DHS31 Mission Lakes Blvd Indian Ave Verbena Dr Desert Hot Springs and Unincorporated
County 4.10 Buffered bike lanes $411,312
RIV72 Monroe St Ave 62 Ave 64 Unincorporated County 1.00 Bike lanes $79,200
IN38 Monroe St Ave 40 I-10 (CV Link)Indio 1.50 Buffered bike lanes $150,480
IN40 Monroe St Whitewater River (CV Link)Fred Waring Dr Indio 0.59 Buffered bike lanes $59,189
RM145 Monterey Ave Dinah Shore Dr Frank Sinatra Dr Rancho Mirage and Palm Desert 2.05 Bike path (partial)$1,209,828
RM146 Monterey Ave Verbenia Rd Clancy Ln Rancho Mirage and Palm Desert 0.25 Bike path $267,723
RM27 Monterey Ave Dinah Shore Dr Gerald Ford Dr Palm Desert 1.00 Bike lanes/Golf Cart lanes $79,200
RIV73 Mountain View Rd Desert Hot Springs city limit (1330 feet north
of Louisan St)Dillon Rd Unincorporated County 0.20 Bike route $7,392
RIV82 Mountain View Rd Dillon Rd Cathedral City city limit (410 feet north of
Varner Rd)Unincorporated County 2.50 Bike lanes $198,000
DHS10 Mountain View Rd Desert View Ave Camino Campanero Desert Hot Springs and Unincorporated
County 1.30 Bike route $48,048
DHS36 Mountain View Rd Desert View Ave Hacienda Ave Desert Hot Springs 0.20 Bike path $196,838
DHS20 North side of Hacienda Ave Long Canyon Julius Corsini Elementary School Desert Hot Springs and Unincorporated
County 0.30 Bike path $295,258
IN47 Oasis St Indio Blvd.Ave 48 Indio 1.57 Buffered bike lanes $157,502
RM152 Parkview Dr Hwy 111 East City Limit Rancho Mirage and Palm Desert 0.56 Bike path (partial)$328,774
CC18 Perez Rd East Palm Canyon Dr Date Palm Dr Cathedral City 1.10 Bike lanes $87,120
RIV74 Pierce St Ave 52 to Ave 60 Ave 66 to Harrison St Unincorporated County and Coachella 11.90 Bike lanes $942,480
COA50 Pierce St Coachella Northern city limit (1320 feet
north of Ave 55)Coachella Southern city limit (Ave 55)Coachella and Unincorporated County 0.20 Bike lanes $15,840
DHS06A Pierson Blvd., Miracle Hill Rd Sierra Blvd. to Indian Canyon Rd Cholla Dr to Palm Dr Desert Hot Springs and Unincorporated
County 5.00 Greenback Sharrows (Buffered bike
lanes with road diet)$343,200
RIV101 Polk St Ave 62 Ave 66 Unincorporated County 2.00 Bike path $1,968,384
COA40 Polk St Ave 48 Ave 52 Coachella 2.00 Bike lanes $158,400
PD66 Portola Ave Shadow Mountain Dr Chicory St Palm Desert 0.10 Bike lanes/Golf Cart lanes $7,920
PS184 Racquet Club Dr N. Palm Canyon Dr N. Indian Canyon Dr Palm Springs 0.30 Bike route $11,088
PS186
Racquet Club Rd, Cardillo Ave,
Via Escuela, Via Norte, Vista
Chino, Via Monte Vista
N. Palm Canyon Dr Crescent Dr Palm Springs 2.50 Bike route $92,400
RM148 Ramon Rd Da Vall Dr Los Alamos Dr Rancho Mirage and Cathedral City 1.00 Bike lanes (partial)$39,628
IN50 Requa Ave Monroe St Indio Blvd.Indio 1.30 Bike route $48,048
PS198 S. Palm Canyon Dr W. Ramon Rd E. Camino Parocela Palm Springs 0.20 Bike route $7,392
PS199 S. Palm Canyon Dr E. Camino Parocela Morongo Rd Palm Springs 0.60 Bike route $22,176
PS200 S. Palm Canyon Dr Morongo Rd E. Palm Canyon Dr Palm Springs 0.20 Bike route $7,392
PS203 San Luis Rey Rd Mission Dr E. Ramon Rd Palm Springs and Cathedral City 0.30 Bike route $11,088
PS203A San Luis Rey Rd Mission Dr E. Ramon Rd Palm Springs and Cathedral City 0.30 Buffered bike lanes $30,096
COA24 Shadow View Blvd.Dillon Rd Tyler St Coachella 1.20 Bike lanes $95,040
PS211 Sunrise Way Whitewater River E. San Rafael Dr Palm Springs 0.60 Buffered bike lanes $60,192
PS212 Sunrise Way E. San Rafael Dr E. Vista Chino Palm Springs 1.00 Buffered bike lanes (with road diet)$100,320
PS218 Tachevah Dr N. Palm Canyon Rd N. Indian Canyon Dr Palm Springs 0.10 Bike lane (with road diet)$7,920
PS226 Tahquitz Canyon Way N. Museum Dr N. Indian Canyon Dr Palm Springs 0.30 Colored bike lanes $39,600
PS228 Tahquitz Canyon Way N. Indian Canyon Dr N. Calle El Segundo Palm Springs 0.20 Greenback sharrows $13,728
PS231 Tamarisk Rd N. Palm Canyon Dr N. Farrell Dr Palm Springs 1.70 Bike route $62,832
RIV85 Tyler St Ave 54 Airport Blvd.Unincorporated County and Coachella 1.00 Bike path $984,192
RIV86 Tyler St Ave 54 Airport Blvd.Unincorporated County and Coachella 1.00 Bike lanes $79,200
COA41 Tyler St Dillon Rd Vista del Norte Coachella 0.50 Bike path $492,096
*Planned regional active transportation project with assumed facility type for costing purposes.
Table 5-2. Regional Bikeway/NEV Costs
ID #Street/Corridor From To Jurisdictions Traversed Miles Bikeway Type Costs
COA44 Tyler St Ave 50 Ave 52 Coachella 1.00 Bike route $36,960
COA46 Tyler St Grapefruit Blvd.54th Ave Coachella 1.20 Bike lanes $95,040
COA43 Tyler St Ave 48 Ave 50 Coachella 1.00 Bike lanes $79,200
RIV92 Van Buren St 54th Ave Airport Blvd.Unincorporated County and Coachella 1.00 Bike lanes $79,200
COA39 Van Buren St Ave 48 Ave 54 Coachella and Unincorporated County 3.00 Bike lanes $237,600
IN84 Van Buren St Indio Blvd.Ave 48 Indio and Unincorporated County 0.50 Bike lanes $39,600
LQ23 Washington St La Quinta Northern City Limit Eisenhower Dr La Quinta and Indian Wells 3.10 Bike lanes $245,520
LQ23A Washington St Palm Desert city limit (80 feet North of
Country Club Dr) La Quinta Northern City Limit Unincorporated County 1.50 Greenback sharrows $102,960
DHS08 West Dr Desert Hot Springs northern city limit (650
feet north of Avenida Jalisco)15th Ave Desert Hot Springs and Unincorporated
County 3.50 Bike lanes $277,200
COA21 West side of Southern Pacific RR
corridor Coachella Northern city limit (Ave 48)Coachella Southern city limit (3520 feet
south of Ave 54)Unincorporated County 4.40 Bike path $4,330,445
IN55 Westward Ho Dr Dune Palms Rd Jefferson St La Quinta and Indio 0.50 Bike route $18,480
Pedestrian Improvement Projects $8,002,450
PEDA01 Palm Canyon Drive and Tahquitz
Canyon Way N/A - Intersection Project Palm Springs Intersection
Project Intersection Project $245,700
PEDA02 Palm Canyon Drive and Arenas
Road N/A - Intersection Project Palm Springs Intersection
Project Intersection Project $245,700
PEDA03 Palm Canyon Drive and Baristo
Road N/A - Intersection Project Palm Springs Transit Hub Transit Hub $245,700
PEDA04 Baristo Road and Belardo Road N/A - Intersection Project Palm Springs Intersection
Project Intersection Project $163,800
PEDA05 Palm Canyon Drive and Ramon
Road N/A - Intersection Project Palm Springs Intersection
Project Intersection Project $245,700
PEDA06
Palm Canyon Drive and Camino
Parocela and Indian Canyon
Drive
N/A - Intersection Project Palm Springs Intersection
Project Intersection Project $245,700
PEDA07 Indian Canyon Drive and Ramon
Road N/A - Intersection Project Palm Springs Intersection
Project Intersection Project $245,700
PEDA08 Indian Canyon Drive and Baristo
Road N/A - Intersection Project Palm Springs Intersection
Project Intersection Project $245,700
PEDA09 Indian Canyon Drive and Arenas
Road N/A - Intersection Project Palm Springs Intersection
Project Intersection Project $327,600
PEDA10 Indian Canyon Drive and
Tahquitz Canyon Way N/A - Intersection Project Palm Springs Intersection
Project Intersection Project $327,600
PEDB00A Farrell Drive Tahquitz Canyon Way Ramon Road Palm Springs
New
Pedestrian
Level Street
Lighting
New Pedestrian Level Street Lighting $316,800
PEDB00B Baristo Road Sunrise Way El Cielo Road Palm Springs
New
Pedestrian
Level Street
Lighting
New Pedestrian Level Street Lighting $633,600
PEDB00C Baristo Road (South Side)El Cielo Road Farrell Drive Palm Springs
New
Sidewalks,
Curbs, and
Gutters
New Sidewalks, Curbs, and Gutters $199,950
PEDB00D Baristo Road (North Side)Pavilion Way 320' East Palm Springs New
Sidewalks New Sidewalks $21,000
PEDB01 Baristo Road and Farrell Drive N/A - Intersection Project Palm Springs Transit Hub Transit Hub $327,600
*Planned regional active transportation project with assumed facility type for costing purposes.
Table 5-2. Regional Bikeway/NEV Costs
ID #Street/Corridor From To Jurisdictions Traversed Miles Bikeway Type Costs
PEDB02 Farrell Drive and Tahquitz
Canyon Way N/A - Intersection Project Palm Springs Intersection
Project Intersection Project $81,900
PEDB03 Baristo Road and Cielo Road N/A - Intersection Project Palm Springs Intersection
Project Intersection Project $163,800
PEDB04 Baristo Road and Civic Drive N/A - Intersection Project Palm Springs Intersection
Project Intersection Project $81,900
PEDB05 Baristo Road and Compadre
Road N/A - Intersection Project Palm Springs Intersection
Project Intersection Project $81,900
PEDB06 Baristo Road and the Palm
Springs High School Entrance N/A - Intersection Project Palm Springs Intersection
Project Intersection Project $163,800
PEDB07 Baristo Road and Cerritos
Drive/Pavilion Way N/A - Intersection Project Palm Springs Intersection
Project Intersection Project $245,700
PEDB08 Farrell Drive and Ramon Road N/A - Intersection Project Palm Springs Intersection
Project Intersection Project $81,900
PEDC00A Buddy Rogers Ave. Palm Canyon Drive B Street Cathedral City New
Sidewalks New Sidewalks $95,200
PEDC00B B Street (North Side)Bus Shelter Further East Cathedral City New
Sidewalks New Sidewalks $6,000
PEDC00C W. Buddy Rogers Ave (east side)Palm Canyon Drive Buddy Rogers Ave (becomes George
Montgomery Ave north of Palm Canyon Dr)Cathedral City New
Sidewalks New Sidewalks $18,000
PEDC00D W. Buddy Rogers Ave (west
side)Palm Canyon Drive Lalo Guerrero Cathedral City New
Sidewalks New Sidewalks $9,000
PEDC00E Palm Canyon Drive (North Side)Buddy Rogers Ave Cathedral Canyon Dr Cathedral City New
Sidewalks New Sidewalks $36,000
PEDC01 B Street and Buddy Rogers
Avenue N/A - Intersection Project Cathedral City Transit Hub Transit Hub $245,700
PEDC02 Van Fleet Street/Monty Hall
Drive and Palm Canyon Drive N/A - Intersection Project Cathedral City Intersection
Project Intersection Project $163,800
PEDC03 Palm Canyon Drive and Buddy
Rogers Avenue N/A - Intersection Project Cathedral City Intersection
Project Intersection Project $81,900
PEDC04 Palm Canyon Drive and
Cathedral Canyon Drive N/A - Intersection Project Cathedral City Intersection
Project Intersection Project $81,900
PEDD00A Fred Waring Drive Highway 111 San Pablo Avenue Palm Desert
New
Pedestrian
Level Street
Lighting
New Pedestrian Level Street Lighting $726,000
PEDD00B Town Center Way Highway 111 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert
New
Pedestrian
Level Street
Lighting
New Pedestrian Level Street Lighting $222,000
PEDD00C Highway 111 Fred Waring Drive Monterey Ave.Palm Desert
New
Pedestrian
Level Street
Lighting
New Pedestrian Level Street Lighting $570,000
PEDD00D Monterey Avenue Highway 111 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert
New
Pedestrian
Level Street
Lighting
New Pedestrian Level Street Lighting $316,800
PEDD01 Highway 111 and Monterey
Avenue N/A - Intersection Project Palm Desert Intersection
Project Intersection Project $81,900
*Planned regional active transportation project with assumed facility type for costing purposes.
Table 5-2. Regional Bikeway/NEV Costs
ID #Street/Corridor From To Jurisdictions Traversed Miles Bikeway Type Costs
PEDD02 Monterey Avenue and Hahn
Road N/A - Intersection Project Palm Desert Intersection
Project Intersection Project $81,900
PEDD03 Town Center Way and Hahn
Road N/A - Intersection Project Palm Desert Transit Hub Transit Hub $81,900
PEDD04 Monterey Avenue and Fred
Waring Drive N/A - Intersection Project Palm Desert Intersection
Project Intersection Project $81,900
PEDD05 Fred Waring Drive and Town
Center Way N/A - Intersection Project Palm Desert Intersection
Project Intersection Project $81,900
PEDD06 Highway 111 and Town Center
Way N/A - Intersection Project Palm Desert Intersection
Project Intersection Project $81,900
Total:$157,688,905
*Planned regional active transportation project with assumed facility type for costing purposes.
Colo
r
a
d
o
Riv
e
r
ARZCRR
ARZC
R
R
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG
¯0 21Miles
!"`$
!"`$
CVAG ATP City of BlytheRegionally Significant ATP Facilities
Figure 5-1
"#= Proposed Index
"8"7
"2
"6
"9
"10
"11
"12
"13
"14
"16
"17
"18
"19
"20
"3
"1
"4
Bike path
Bike/NEV pathMultipurpose path
Multipurpose NEV pathBike lane
Bike/NEV lane
Buffered bike laneBuffered bike/NEV lane
Colored bike laneColored bike/NEV lane
Colored buffered bike laneColored buffered bike/NEV lane
Double colored buffered bike lane
Bike routeGreenback sharrows
Bike path (partial)Bike lanes (partial)
Golf path
"21
"22Golf lane
N/A
Proposed Bicycle Facilities Existing Bicycle Facilities
Bike path
Multipurpose path
Sidewalk pathBike lane
Buffered bike lane
Bike route
Greenback sharrowsBike path (partial)
(!#= Existing Index
(!1
(!3
(!6
(!8
(!5
(!16
(!17
(!18
Colored buffered bike lane
Colored buffered bike lane/NEV lane(!12
(!13
Bike lanes (partial)Golf path(!19
(!20
Proposed Transit Bike Parking
Bike Parking
*#Proposed
*#ExistingBike Amenities
*#Proposed
#Existing
*#Bike Locker
##Bike Rack
Colo
r
a
d
o
Riv
e
r
ARZCRR
ARZC
R
R
CVAG ATP City of BlytheRegionally Significant ATP with Facility ID
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG
¯0 21Miles
!"`$
!"`$
See CVAG ATP Chapter 4 Table for Facility ID Reference
Proposed Bicycle Facilities
Existing Bicycle Facilities
!!
Figure 5-1a
!"`$
AÙ
!"`$
!"`$
UNION
P
A
C
I
F
I
C
R
R
4/1
8
/
2
0
1
7
J
N
M
:
\
M
d
a
t
a
\
1
4
4
8
3
7
\
G
I
S
\
M
X
D
\
A
c
t
i
v
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
\
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
S
i
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
c
e
\
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
A
T
P
C
i
t
y
F
i
g
u
r
e
s
4
_
1
2
_
1
6
\
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
B
i
k
e
w
a
y
M
a
p
s
w
i
t
h
C
l
a
s
s
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
F
i
n
a
l
\
C
V
A
G
A
T
P
C
a
t
h
e
d
r
a
l
C
i
t
y
n
o
I
D
R
S
C
l
a
s
s
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
.
m
x
d
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG
¯0 21Miles
CVAG ATP City of Cathedral CityRegionally Significant ATP Facilities
Figure 5-2
"#= Proposed Index
"8"7
"2
"6
"9
"10
"11
"12
"13
"14
"16
"17
"18
"19
"20
"3
"1
"4
Bike path
Bike/NEV path
Multipurpose path
Multipurpose NEV path
Bike laneBike/NEV lane
Buffered bike lane
Buffered bike/NEV lane
Colored bike lane
Colored bike/NEV laneColored buffered bike lane
Colored buffered bike/NEV laneDouble colored buffered bike lane
Bike route
Greenback sharrowsBike path (partial)
Bike lanes (partial)Golf path
"21
"22Golf lane
N/A
Proposed Bicycle Facilities Existing Bicycle Facilities
Bike pathMultipurpose path
Sidewalk pathBike lane
Buffered bike lane
Bike route
Greenback sharrows
Bike path (partial)
(!#= Existing Index
(!1
(!3
(!6
(!8
(!5
(!16
(!17
(!18
Colored buffered bike laneColored buffered bike lane/NEV lane(!12
(!13
Bike lanes (partial)
Golf path(!19
(!20
Proposed Transit Bike Parking
Bike Parking
*#Proposed
*#ExistingBike Amenities
*#Proposed
#Existing
*#Bike Locker
##Bike Rack
!"`$
AÙ
!"`$
!"`$
UNION
P
A
C
I
F
I
C
R
R
4/1
8
/
2
0
1
7
J
N
M
:
\
M
d
a
t
a
\
1
4
4
8
3
7
\
G
I
S
\
M
X
D
\
A
c
t
i
v
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
\
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
S
i
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
c
e
\
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
A
T
P
C
i
t
y
F
i
g
u
r
e
s
4
_
1
2
_
1
6
\
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
B
i
k
e
w
a
y
M
a
p
s
w
i
t
h
I
D
F
i
n
a
l
\
C
V
A
G
A
T
P
C
a
t
h
e
d
r
a
l
C
i
t
y
I
D
.
m
x
d
CVAG ATP City of Cathedral CityRegionally Significant ATP with Facility ID
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG
¯0 21Miles
See CVAG ATP Chapter 4 Table for Facility ID Reference
Proposed Bicycle Facilities
Existing Bicycle Facilities
!!
Figure 5-2a
!"`$
A¿
A¿
AÙ
UNIONPACIFICRR
4/1
8
/
2
0
1
7
J
N
M
:
\
M
d
a
t
a
\
1
4
4
8
3
7
\
G
I
S
\
M
X
D
\
A
c
t
i
v
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
\
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
S
i
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
c
e
\
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
A
T
P
C
i
t
y
F
i
g
u
r
e
s
4
_
1
2
_
1
6
\
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
B
i
k
e
w
a
y
M
a
p
s
w
i
t
h
C
l
a
s
s
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
F
i
n
a
l
\
C
V
A
G
A
T
P
C
o
a
c
h
e
l
l
a
n
o
I
D
R
S
C
l
a
s
s
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
.
m
x
d
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG
¯0 21Miles
"#= Proposed Index
"8"7
"2
"6
"9
"10
"11
"12
"13
"14
"16
"17
"18
"19
"20
"3
"1
"4
Bike path
Bike/NEV path
Multipurpose path Multipurpose NEV path
Bike laneBike/NEV lane
Buffered bike laneBuffered bike/NEV lane
Colored bike lane
Colored bike/NEV laneColored buffered bike lane
Colored buffered bike/NEV laneDouble colored buffered bike lane
Bike route
Greenback sharrowsBike path (partial)
Bike lanes (partial)Golf path
"21
"22Golf lane
N/A
Proposed Bicycle Facilities Existing Bicycle Facilities
Bike pathMultipurpose path
Sidewalk path
Bike lane
Buffered bike lane
Bike route
Greenback sharrowsBike path (partial)
(!#= Existing Index
(!1
(!3
(!6
(!8
(!5
(!16
(!17
(!18
Colored buffered bike laneColored buffered bike lane/NEV lane(!12(!13
Bike lanes (partial)
Golf path(!19
(!20
Proposed Transit Bike Parking
Bike Parking
*#Proposed
*#ExistingBike Amenities
*#Proposed
#Existing
*#Bike Locker
##Bike Rack
CVAG ATP City of CoachellaRegionally Significant ATP Facilities
Figure 5-3
!"`$
A¿
A¿
AÙ
UNIO
N
P
A
C
I
F
I
C
R
R
4/1
8
/
2
0
1
7
J
N
M
:
\
M
d
a
t
a
\
1
4
4
8
3
7
\
G
I
S
\
M
X
D
\
A
c
t
i
v
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
\
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
S
i
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
c
e
\
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
A
T
P
C
i
t
y
F
i
g
u
r
e
s
4
_
1
2
_
1
6
\
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
B
i
k
e
w
a
y
M
a
p
s
w
i
t
h
I
D
F
i
n
a
l
\
C
V
A
G
A
T
P
C
o
a
c
h
e
l
l
a
I
D
.
m
x
d
CVAG ATP City of CoachellaRegionally Significant ATP with Facility ID
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG
¯0 21Miles
See CVAG ATP Chapter 4 Table for Facility ID Reference
Proposed Bicycle Facilities
Existing Bicycle Facilities
!!
Figure 5-3a
A¡
!"`$
!"`$
UNION PACIFIC RR
4/1
8
/
2
0
1
7
J
N
M
:
\
M
d
a
t
a
\
1
4
4
8
3
7
\
G
I
S
\
M
X
D
\
A
c
t
i
v
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
\
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
S
i
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
c
e
\
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
A
T
P
C
i
t
y
F
i
g
u
r
e
s
4
_
1
2
_
1
6
\
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
B
i
k
e
w
a
y
M
a
p
s
w
i
t
h
C
l
a
s
s
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
F
i
n
a
l
\
C
V
A
G
A
T
P
D
e
s
e
r
t
H
o
t
S
p
r
i
n
g
s
n
o
I
D
R
S
C
l
a
s
s
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
.
m
x
d
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG
¯0 21Miles
CVAG ATP City of Desert Hot SpringsRegionally Significant ATP Facilities
Figure 5-4
"#= Proposed Index
"8"7
"2
"6
"9
"10
"11
"12
"13
"14
"16
"17
"18
"19
"20
"3
"1
"4
Bike pathBike/NEV path
Multipurpose path Multipurpose NEV path
Bike laneBike/NEV lane
Buffered bike lane
Buffered bike/NEV laneColored bike lane
Colored bike/NEV laneColored buffered bike lane
Colored buffered bike/NEV lane
Double colored buffered bike laneBike route
Greenback sharrowsBike path (partial)
Bike lanes (partial)Golf path
"21
"22Golf lane
N/A
Proposed Bicycle Facilities Existing Bicycle Facilities
Bike pathMultipurpose path
Sidewalk path
Bike lane
Buffered bike lane
Bike route
Greenback sharrows
Bike path (partial)
(!#= Existing Index
(!1
(!3
(!6
(!8
(!5
(!16
(!17
(!18
Colored buffered bike laneColored buffered bike lane/NEV lane(!12
(!13
Bike lanes (partial)
Golf path(!19
(!20
Proposed Transit Bike Parking
Bike Parking
*#Proposed
*#ExistingBike Amenities
*#Proposed
#Existing
*#Bike Locker
##Bike Rack
A¡
!"`$
!"`$
UNION PACIFIC RR
4/1
8
/
2
0
1
7
J
N
M
:
\
M
d
a
t
a
\
1
4
4
8
3
7
\
G
I
S
\
M
X
D
\
A
c
t
i
v
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
\
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
S
i
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
c
e
\
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
A
T
P
C
i
t
y
F
i
g
u
r
e
s
4
_
1
2
_
1
6
\
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
B
i
k
e
w
a
y
M
a
p
s
w
i
t
h
I
D
F
i
n
a
l
\
C
V
A
G
A
T
P
D
e
s
e
r
t
H
o
t
S
p
r
i
n
g
s
I
D
.
m
x
d
CVAG ATP City of Desert Hot SpringsRegionally Significant ATP with Facility ID
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG
¯0 21Miles
See CVAG ATP Chapter 4 Table for Facility ID Reference
Proposed Bicycle Facilities
Existing Bicycle Facilities
!!
Figure 5-4a
A±
AÙ
4/1
8
/
2
0
1
7
J
N
M
:
\
M
d
a
t
a
\
1
4
4
8
3
7
\
G
I
S
\
M
X
D
\
A
c
t
i
v
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
\
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
S
i
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
c
e
\
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
A
T
P
C
i
t
y
F
i
g
u
r
e
s
4
_
1
2
_
1
6
\
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
B
i
k
e
w
a
y
M
a
p
s
w
i
t
h
C
l
a
s
s
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
F
i
n
a
l
\
C
V
A
G
A
T
P
I
n
d
i
a
n
W
e
l
l
s
n
o
I
D
R
S
C
l
a
s
s
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
.
m
x
d
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG
¯0 21Miles
Potential CV Link
CVAG ATP City of Indian WellsRegionally Significant ATP Facilities
Figure 5-5
"#= Proposed Index
"8"7
"2
"6
"9
"10
"11
"12
"13
"14
"16
"17
"18
"19
"20
"3
"1
"4
Bike pathBike/NEV path
Multipurpose path Multipurpose NEV path
Bike laneBike/NEV lane
Buffered bike lane
Buffered bike/NEV laneColored bike lane
Colored bike/NEV laneColored buffered bike lane
Colored buffered bike/NEV lane
Double colored buffered bike laneBike route
Greenback sharrowsBike path (partial)
Bike lanes (partial)Golf path
"21
"22Golf lane
N/A
Proposed Bicycle Facilities Existing Bicycle Facilities
Bike pathMultipurpose path
Sidewalk path
Bike lane
Buffered bike lane
Bike route
Greenback sharrows
Bike path (partial)
(!#= Existing Index
(!1
(!3
(!6
(!8
(!5
(!16
(!17
(!18
Colored buffered bike laneColored buffered bike lane/NEV lane(!12
(!13
Bike lanes (partial)
Golf path(!19
(!20
Proposed Transit Bike Parking
Bike Parking
*#Proposed
*#ExistingBike Amenities
*#Proposed
#Existing
*#Bike Locker
##Bike Rack
A±
AÙ
4/1
8
/
2
0
1
7
J
N
M
:
\
M
d
a
t
a
\
1
4
4
8
3
7
\
G
I
S
\
M
X
D
\
A
c
t
i
v
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
\
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
S
i
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
c
e
\
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
A
T
P
C
i
t
y
F
i
g
u
r
e
s
4
_
1
2
_
1
6
\
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
B
i
k
e
w
a
y
M
a
p
s
w
i
t
h
I
D
F
i
n
a
l
\
C
V
A
G
A
T
P
I
n
d
i
a
n
W
e
l
l
s
I
D
.
m
x
d
CVAG ATP City of Indian WellsRegionally Significant ATP with Facility ID
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG
¯0 21Miles
Potential CV Link
See CVAG ATP Chapter 4 Table for Facility ID Reference
Proposed Bicycle Facilities
Existing Bicycle Facilities
!!
Figure 5-5a
!"`$
!"`$
A¿
AÙE
AÌ
4/1
8
/
2
0
1
7
J
N
M
:
\
M
d
a
t
a
\
1
4
4
8
3
7
\
G
I
S
\
M
X
D
\
A
c
t
i
v
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
\
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
S
i
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
c
e
\
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
A
T
P
C
i
t
y
F
i
g
u
r
e
s
4
_
1
2
_
1
6
\
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
B
i
k
e
w
a
y
M
a
p
s
w
i
t
h
C
l
a
s
s
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
F
i
n
a
l
\
C
V
A
G
A
T
P
I
n
d
i
o
n
o
I
D
R
S
C
l
a
s
s
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
.
m
x
d
CVAG ATP City of IndioRegionally Significant ATP Facilities
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG Figure 5-6
¯0 21Miles
""2
""9
""16
""8
""3
""6 ""4
""7
""8
""16
""8 ""8 ""6
""6
""3""6
""16
""6
""6
""16
""6
""16
""8
""6
""9
""16
""6""6 !!6
!!6
!!6
!!6
!!6
!!6
!!6
!!6
""16
""8""8
""22
""7
""2
""8
""3
!!6
!!6 !!6
!!6
!!6
A¿
AÙ
"#= Proposed Index
"8"7
"2
"6
"9
"10
"11
"12
"13
"14
"16
"17
"18
"19
"20
"3
"1
"4
Bike pathBike/NEV path
Multipurpose path Multipurpose NEV path
Bike laneBike/NEV lane
Buffered bike lane
Buffered bike/NEV laneColored bike lane
Colored bike/NEV laneColored buffered bike lane
Colored buffered bike/NEV lane
Double colored buffered bike laneBike route
Greenback sharrowsBike path (partial)
Bike lanes (partial)Golf path
"21
"22Golf laneN/A
Proposed Bicycle Facilities Existing Bicycle Facilities
Bike pathMultipurpose pathSidewalk path
Bike laneBuffered bike lane
Bike route
Greenback sharrows
Bike path (partial)
(!#= Existing Index
(!1
(!3
(!6
(!8
(!5
(!16
(!17
(!18
Colored buffered bike lane
Colored buffered bike lane/NEV lane(!12
(!13
Bike lanes (partial)
Golf path(!19
(!20
Proposed Transit Bike Parking
Bike Parking
*#Proposed
*#ExistingBike Amenities
*#Proposed
#Existing
*#Bike Locker
##Bike Rack
!"`$
!"`$
AÙE
A¿
UNIONPACIFICRR
4/1
8
/
2
0
1
7
J
N
M
:
\
M
d
a
t
a
\
1
4
4
8
3
7
\
G
I
S
\
M
X
D
\
A
c
t
i
v
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
\
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
S
i
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
c
e
\
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
A
T
P
C
i
t
y
F
i
g
u
r
e
s
4
_
1
2
_
1
6
\
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
B
i
k
e
w
a
y
M
a
p
s
w
i
t
h
I
D
F
i
n
a
l
\
C
V
A
G
A
T
P
I
n
d
i
o
I
D
.
m
x
d
CVAG ATP City of IndioRegionally Significant ATP with Facility ID
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG
¯0 21Miles
!
!
!!
!
!!
!!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
AVENUE 48 OA
S
I
S
ST
AVENUE44
DRCARREON BLVD
VA
N
B
U
R
E
N
ST
AR
A
B
I
A
S
T
REQUA AVECL
I
N
T
O
N
ST
45TH
AVE
GO
L
F
C
E
N
T
E
R
P
K
W
Y
CA
L
H
O
U
N
ST
INDIOBLVDDATE
AVE
CIVIC CENTERDR
FRED
WARINGDR
EM
E
R
A
L
D
A
V
E
GOLF
CENTER
PKWY CABAZONAVE
JA
C
K
S
O
N
S
T
IN
4
1
IN30
IN58
IN68
IN81
IN34
IN
4
7
IN52
IN
6
9
IN
4
4
IN
4
3
IN52A
IN72
IN50
!(H1113
0
COA68IN
8
4
IN51
IN31
IN
8
3
ISDC
C
IN
4
0
IN49
IN
7
0
CO
A
3
9
CO
A
1
0
0
GCPC
C
2
GCPC
C
COA51
!(
IN
7
1
!(IN32
RIV09
ISDC
C
2
IN68A
A¿
AÙ
See CVAG ATP Chapter 4 Table for Facility ID Reference
Proposed Bicycle Facilities
Existing Bicycle Facilities
!!
Figure 5-6a
!"`$
A¿
AÙ
A±
AÙ
4/1
7
/
2
0
1
7
J
N
M
:
\
M
d
a
t
a
\
1
4
4
8
3
7
\
G
I
S
\
M
X
D
\
A
c
t
i
v
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
\
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
S
i
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
c
e
\
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
A
T
P
C
i
t
y
F
i
g
u
r
e
s
4
_
1
2
_
1
6
\
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
B
i
k
e
w
a
y
M
a
p
s
w
i
t
h
C
l
a
s
s
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
F
i
n
a
l
\
C
V
A
G
A
T
P
L
a
Q
u
i
n
t
a
n
o
I
D
R
S
C
l
a
s
s
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
.
m
x
d
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG
¯0 21Miles
AVENUE 48
MILES AVE
AVENUE 50
EISENHOWER
DR
AD
A
M
S
ST
DU
N
E
PA
L
M
S
RD
WA
S
H
I
N
G
T
O
N
S
T
46TH AVE
""6""9 ""8
!!6
!!5 !!6
!!6
!!6
!!5
!!6
!!6
!!6
!!5!!16
!!5
!!6!!6
!!5
!!6
!!6
""22
""4
""7 ""7
""6
""16
""7
""7
""8
""9
""2
""6
""2
""16 ""6
""3""1
""6
""8
AVENUE 50
EISENHOWER
DR
AV
E
N
I
D
A
B
E
R
M
U
D
A
S
!!6!!6
!!6
!!6
!!6
!!6
""6
""6
""16
""16
""7
CVAG ATP City of La QuintaRegionally Significant ATP Facilities
Figure 5-7
"#= Proposed Index
"8"7
"2
"6
"9
"10
"11
"12
"13
"14
"16
"17
"18
"19
"20
"3
"1
"4
Bike path
Bike/NEV path
Multipurpose path Multipurpose NEV path
Bike laneBike/NEV lane
Buffered bike lane
Buffered bike/NEV lane
Colored bike lane
Colored bike/NEV laneColored buffered bike lane
Colored buffered bike/NEV lane
Double colored buffered bike lane
Bike route
Greenback sharrowsBike path (partial)
Bike lanes (partial)
Golf path
"21
"22Golf lane
N/A
Proposed Bicycle Facilities Existing Bicycle Facilities
Bike pathMultipurpose path
Sidewalk path
Bike laneBuffered bike lane
Bike route
Greenback sharrows
Bike path (partial)
(!#= Existing Index
(!1
(!3
(!6
(!8
(!5
(!16
(!17
(!18
Colored buffered bike lane
Colored buffered bike lane/NEV lane(!12
(!13
Bike lanes (partial)
Golf path(!19
(!20
Proposed Transit Bike Parking
Bike Parking
*#Proposed
*#ExistingBike Amenities
*#Proposed
#Existing
*#Bike Locker
##Bike Rack
!"`$
A¿
AÙ
A±
AÙ
UNION P
A
C
I
F
I
C
R
R
4/1
8
/
2
0
1
7
J
N
M
:
\
M
d
a
t
a
\
1
4
4
8
3
7
\
G
I
S
\
M
X
D
\
A
c
t
i
v
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
\
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
S
i
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
c
e
\
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
A
T
P
C
i
t
y
F
i
g
u
r
e
s
4
_
1
2
_
1
6
\
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
B
i
k
e
w
a
y
M
a
p
s
w
i
t
h
I
D
F
i
n
a
l
\
C
V
A
G
A
T
P
L
a
Q
u
i
n
t
a
I
D
.
m
x
d
CVAG ATP City of La QuintaRegionally Significant ATP with Facility ID
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG
¯0 21Miles
See CVAG ATP Chapter 5 Table for Facility ID Reference
Proposed Bicycle Facilities
Existing Bicycle Facilities
!!
Figure 5-7a
AÙ
!"`$
!"`$
A±
AÙ
AÙ
AÙ
UNIONPACIFICRR
4/1
8
/
2
0
1
7
J
N
M
:
\
M
d
a
t
a
\
1
4
4
8
3
7
\
G
I
S
\
M
X
D
\
A
c
t
i
v
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
\
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
S
i
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
c
e
\
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
A
T
P
C
i
t
y
F
i
g
u
r
e
s
4
_
1
2
_
1
6
\
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
B
i
k
e
w
a
y
M
a
p
s
w
i
t
h
C
l
a
s
s
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
F
i
n
a
l
\
C
V
A
G
A
T
P
P
a
l
m
D
e
s
e
r
t
n
o
I
D
R
S
C
l
a
s
s
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
.
m
x
d
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG
¯0 21Miles
""20
""22
""16
""20
""22
""18
""20
!!20
!!16
!!16
!!6
!!5
!!5
!!16
!!20
!!6
!!6
!!6
!!20 !!20
!!6
!!6
!!6
!!20
!!6
!!16
!!1
!!20
!!1
!!20!!20
!!18
""7
""21
""12
""12AÙ
A±
CVAG ATP City of Palm DesertRegionally Significant ATP Facilities
Figure 5-8
"#= Proposed Index
"8"7
"2
"6
"9
"10
"11
"12
"13
"14
"16
"17
"18
"19
"20
"3
"1
"4
Bike pathBike/NEV path
Multipurpose path Multipurpose NEV path
Bike laneBike/NEV lane
Buffered bike lane
Buffered bike/NEV laneColored bike lane
Colored bike/NEV laneColored buffered bike lane
Colored buffered bike/NEV lane
Double colored buffered bike laneBike route
Greenback sharrowsBike path (partial)
Bike lanes (partial)Golf path
"21
"22Golf laneN/A
Proposed Bicycle Facilities Existing Bicycle Facilities
Bike pathMultipurpose pathSidewalk path
Bike laneBuffered bike lane
Bike route
Greenback sharrows
Bike path (partial)
(!#= Existing Index
(!1
(!3
(!6
(!8
(!5
(!16
(!17
(!18
Colored buffered bike lane
Colored buffered bike lane/NEV lane(!12
(!13
Bike lanes (partial)
Golf path(!19
(!20
Proposed Transit Bike Parking
Bike Parking
*#Proposed
*#ExistingBike Amenities
*#Proposed
#Existing
*#Bike Locker
##Bike Rack
AÙ
!"`$
!"`$
A±
AÙ
AÙ
AÙ
UNIONPACIFICRR
4/1
8
/
2
0
1
7
J
N
M
:
\
M
d
a
t
a
\
1
4
4
8
3
7
\
G
I
S
\
M
X
D
\
A
c
t
i
v
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
\
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
S
i
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
c
e
\
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
A
T
P
C
i
t
y
F
i
g
u
r
e
s
4
_
1
2
_
1
6
\
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
B
i
k
e
w
a
y
M
a
p
s
w
i
t
h
I
D
F
i
n
a
l
\
C
V
A
G
A
T
P
P
a
l
m
D
e
s
e
r
t
I
D
.
m
x
d
CVAG ATP City of Palm DesertRegionally Significant ATP with Facility ID
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG
¯0 21Miles
AÙ
A±
See CVAG ATP Chapter 4 Table for Facility ID Reference
Proposed Bicycle Facilities
Existing Bicycle Facilities
!!
Figure 5-8a
A¡
!"`$
!"`$
AÙ
UNION PACIFIC RR
4/1
7
/
2
0
1
7
J
N
M
:
\
M
d
a
t
a
\
1
4
4
8
3
7
\
G
I
S
\
M
X
D
\
A
c
t
i
v
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
\
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
S
i
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
c
e
\
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
A
T
P
C
i
t
y
F
i
g
u
r
e
s
4
_
1
2
_
1
6
\
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
B
i
k
e
w
a
y
M
a
p
s
w
i
t
h
C
l
a
s
s
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
F
i
n
a
l
\
C
V
A
G
A
T
P
P
a
l
m
S
p
r
i
n
g
s
N
o
r
t
h
n
o
I
D
R
S
C
l
a
s
s
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
.
m
x
d
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG
¯0 21Miles
SAN RAFAEL DR
PALM
CANYON
DR
INDIANCANYON
DR
RACQUET CLUB RD
AVENIDA
CABALLEROS
FARRELL
DR
VISTA CHINO
FRANCIS DR
VIA MI
R
A
L
E
S
T
E
CE
R
R
I
T
O
S
R
D
JOYCEDR
FA
R
R
E
L
L
D
R
VIA ESCUELA
PASEO ELMIRADOR
SU
N
R
I
S
E
W
A
Y
VI
A
M
I
R
A
L
E
S
T
E
""12
!!5
!!16
!!17
!!16
!!6
!!16
""16
""16
""2""6 ""1
""16
""8
""17
!!5
AÙ
m mSee City of Palm Springs - Center CVAG ATP City of Palm SpringsRegionally Significant ATP Facilities
Figure 5-9a
"#= Proposed Index
"8"7
"2
"6
"9
"10
"11
"12
"13
"14
"16
"17
"18
"19
"20
"3
"1
"4
Bike pathBike/NEV path
Multipurpose path Multipurpose NEV path
Bike laneBike/NEV lane
Buffered bike lane
Buffered bike/NEV laneColored bike lane
Colored bike/NEV laneColored buffered bike lane
Colored buffered bike/NEV lane
Double colored buffered bike laneBike route
Greenback sharrowsBike path (partial)
Bike lanes (partial)Golf path
"21
"22Golf laneN/A
Proposed Bicycle Facilities Existing Bicycle Facilities
Bike pathMultipurpose pathSidewalk path
Bike laneBuffered bike lane
Bike route
Greenback sharrows
Bike path (partial)
(!#= Existing Index
(!1
(!3
(!6
(!8
(!5
(!16
(!17
(!18
Colored buffered bike lane
Colored buffered bike lane/NEV lane(!12
(!13
Bike lanes (partial)
Golf path(!19
(!20
Proposed Transit Bike Parking
Bike Parking
*#Proposed
*#ExistingBike Amenities
*#Proposed
#Existing
*#Bike Locker
##Bike Rack
4/1
8
/
2
0
1
7
J
N
M
:
\
M
d
a
t
a
\
1
4
4
8
3
7
\
G
I
S
\
M
X
D
\
A
c
t
i
v
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
\
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
S
i
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
c
e
\
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
A
T
P
C
i
t
y
F
i
g
u
r
e
s
4
_
1
2
_
1
6
\
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
B
i
k
e
w
a
y
M
a
p
s
w
i
t
h
C
l
a
s
s
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
F
i
n
a
l
\
C
V
A
G
A
T
P
P
a
l
m
S
p
r
i
n
g
s
C
e
n
t
e
r
n
o
I
D
R
S
C
l
a
s
s
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
.
m
x
d
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG
¯0 21Miles
*#
*#
*#
*#
*#
*#
*#
*#
*#
*#
*#
*#
*#
*#
*#
*#*#
*#
*#
*#
*#
*#
*#
*#
*#
*#
*#
*#
INDIA
NCANYON
DR
ALEJO RD
PA
L
M
C
A
N
Y
O
N
DR
BE
L
A
R
D
O
R
D
TAHQUITZ
CANYONWAY
PA
T
E
N
C
I
O
R
D
VINE
A
V
E
CHINO DR
ARENAS RD
BARISTO RD
RAMON RD
MU
S
E
U
M
D
R
BE
L
A
R
D
O
R
D
AMADO RD
BARISTO
RD
AV
E
N
I
D
A
C
A
B
A
L
L
E
R
O
S
CA
L
L
E
E
L
S
E
G
U
N
D
O
CA
L
L
E
E
N
C
I
L
I
A
CA
H
U
I
L
L
A
R
D
!!13
!!6
!!13
!!16
!!16 !!12!!16
!!17
!!16
!!6
!!16
""16
""10
""17
""8
""6
""17
""9
""8
""17
""10
""8
""16
AÙ
m mSee City of Palm Springs - North
m mSee City of Palm Springs - South CVAG ATP City of Palm SpringsRegionally Significant ATP Facilities
Figure 5-9b
"#= Proposed Index
"8"7
"2
"6
"9
"10
"11
"12
"13
"14
"16
"17
"18
"19
"20
"3
"1
"4
Bike pathBike/NEV path
Multipurpose path Multipurpose NEV path
Bike laneBike/NEV lane
Buffered bike lane
Buffered bike/NEV laneColored bike lane
Colored bike/NEV laneColored buffered bike lane
Colored buffered bike/NEV lane
Double colored buffered bike laneBike route
Greenback sharrowsBike path (partial)
Bike lanes (partial)Golf path
"21
"22Golf laneN/A
Proposed Bicycle Facilities Existing Bicycle Facilities
Bike pathMultipurpose pathSidewalk path
Bike laneBuffered bike lane
Bike route
Greenback sharrows
Bike path (partial)
(!#= Existing Index
(!1
(!3
(!6
(!8
(!5
(!16
(!17
(!18
Colored buffered bike lane
Colored buffered bike lane/NEV lane(!12
(!13
Bike lanes (partial)
Golf path(!19
(!20
Proposed Transit Bike Parking
Bike Parking
*#Proposed
*#ExistingBike Amenities
*#Proposed
#Existing
*#Bike Locker
##Bike Rack
AÙ
4/1
7
/
2
0
1
7
J
N
M
:
\
M
d
a
t
a
\
1
4
4
8
3
7
\
G
I
S
\
M
X
D
\
A
c
t
i
v
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
\
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
S
i
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
c
e
\
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
A
T
P
C
i
t
y
F
i
g
u
r
e
s
4
_
1
2
_
1
6
\
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
B
i
k
e
w
a
y
M
a
p
s
w
i
t
h
C
l
a
s
s
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
F
i
n
a
l
\
C
V
A
G
A
T
P
P
a
l
m
S
p
r
i
n
g
s
S
o
u
t
h
n
o
I
D
R
S
C
l
a
s
s
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
.
m
x
d
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG
¯0 21Miles
m mSee City of Palm Springs - Center
CVAG ATP City of Palm SpringsRegionally Significant ATP Facilities
Figure 5-9c
"#= Proposed Index
"8"7
"2
"6
"9
"10
"11
"12
"13
"14
"16
"17
"18
"19
"20
"3
"1
"4
Bike pathBike/NEV path
Multipurpose path Multipurpose NEV path
Bike laneBike/NEV lane
Buffered bike lane
Buffered bike/NEV laneColored bike lane
Colored bike/NEV laneColored buffered bike lane
Colored buffered bike/NEV lane
Double colored buffered bike laneBike route
Greenback sharrowsBike path (partial)
Bike lanes (partial)Golf path
"21
"22Golf lane
N/A
Proposed Bicycle Facilities Existing Bicycle Facilities
Bike pathMultipurpose path
Sidewalk path
Bike lane
Buffered bike lane
Bike route
Greenback sharrows
Bike path (partial)
(!#= Existing Index
(!1
(!3
(!6
(!8
(!5
(!16
(!17
(!18
Colored buffered bike laneColored buffered bike lane/NEV lane(!12
(!13
Bike lanes (partial)
Golf path(!19
(!20
Proposed Transit Bike Parking
Bike Parking
*#Proposed
*#ExistingBike Amenities
*#Proposed
#Existing
*#Bike Locker
##Bike Rack
A¡
!"`$
!"`$
AÙ
UNION PACIFIC RR
4/1
8
/
2
0
1
7
J
N
M
:
\
M
d
a
t
a
\
1
4
4
8
3
7
\
G
I
S
\
M
X
D
\
A
c
t
i
v
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
\
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
S
i
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
c
e
\
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
A
T
P
C
i
t
y
F
i
g
u
r
e
s
4
_
1
2
_
1
6
\
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
B
i
k
e
w
a
y
M
a
p
s
w
i
t
h
I
D
F
i
n
a
l
\
C
V
A
G
A
T
P
P
a
l
m
S
p
r
i
n
g
s
N
o
r
t
h
I
D
.
m
x
d
CVAG ATP City of Palm Springs - NorthRegionally Significant ATP with Facility ID
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG
¯0 21Miles
SAN RAFAEL DR
PALM
CANYONDR
INDIANCANYON
DR
RACQUET CLUB RD
AVENIDA
CABALLEROS
FARRELL
DR
VISTA CHINO
FRANCIS DR
VI
AMIR
A
L
E
S
T
E
CE
R
R
I
T
O
S
R
D
JOYCEDR
FA
R
R
E
L
L
D
R
VIA ESCUELA
PASEO ELMIRADOR
SU
N
R
I
S
E
W
A
Y
VIA
M
I
R
A
L
E
S
T
E
!(
PS58
PS
1
4
2
PS
8
9
PS
1
5
7
PS88
PS
1
4
3
PS
1
5
6
PS184
PS
2
1
1
PS
2
1
2
PS
2
1
3
PS242 PS244PS243
PS
1
5
5
B
AÙ
m mSee City of Palm Springs - CenterSee CVAG ATP Chapter 4 Table for Facility ID Reference
Proposed Bicycle Facilities
Existing Bicycle Facilities
!!
Figure 5-9d
PS2
5
4
PS169
PS77
PS
9
2
PS
8
8
PS
8
9
PS191A
PS
2
0
0
PS
1
4
5
PS
1
4
4
A
PS188 PS191
PS
1
4
4
PS190
PS
2
1
4
PS168
PS
8
5
PS
1
2
2
PS228
PS130
PS70
PS
7
6
PS193
PS61
PS
8
4
PS91A
PS
2
5
5
PS
1
4
9
D
PS
1
1
8
PS
2
1
3
PS172
PS25
2
PS1
4
9
A
PS191B
PS25
3
PS1
4
9
B
PS
8
6
PS
1
4
5
A
PS
1
7
7
PS
1
5
7
PS170
PS
1
8
0
PS91
PS194
PS173
PS
1
6
3
PS131
PS231
PS
2
1
5
PS62
PS1
9
8
SJ
D
C
C
PS
1
1
7
PS
9
3
PS
1
9
9
PS25
1
PS
1
4
9
PS
1
8
6
PS
1
0
0
PS166
PS114
!(PS115
PS218
PS78
PS187
PS226
PS149C
4/1
8
/
2
0
1
7
J
N
M
:
\
M
d
a
t
a
\
1
4
4
8
3
7
\
G
I
S
\
M
X
D
\
A
c
t
i
v
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
\
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
S
i
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
c
e
\
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
A
T
P
C
i
t
y
F
i
g
u
r
e
s
4
_
1
2
_
1
6
\
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
B
i
k
e
w
a
y
M
a
p
s
w
i
t
h
I
D
F
i
n
a
l
\
C
V
A
G
A
T
P
P
a
l
m
S
p
r
i
n
g
s
C
e
n
t
e
r
I
D
.
m
x
d
CVAG ATP City of Palm Springs - CenterRegionally Significant ATP with Facility ID
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG
¯0 21Miles
!
!!!!
!!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!!
! !
! !
!!
!
!!
INDIA
NCANYON
DR
ALEJO RD
PA
L
M
C
A
N
Y
O
N
DR
BE
L
A
R
D
O
R
D
TAHQUITZ
CANYONWAY
PA
T
E
N
C
I
O
R
D
VINE
A
V
E
CHINO DR
ARENAS RD
BARISTO RD
RAMON RD
MU
S
E
U
M
D
R
BE
L
A
R
D
O
R
D
AMADO RD
BARISTO
RD
AV
E
N
I
D
A
C
A
B
A
L
L
E
R
O
S
CA
L
L
E
E
L
S
E
G
U
N
D
O
CA
L
L
E
E
N
C
I
L
I
A
CA
H
U
I
L
L
A
R
D
PS77
PS191PS188
PS190
PS
8
5
PS
8
6
PS228
PS70
PS
8
4
PS
1
8
0
PS
1
6
3
PS198
PS78
PS187
!(PS177 PS157
PS226
!(PS91A
AÙ
m mSee City of Palm Springs - North
m mSee City of Palm Springs - SouthSee CVAG ATP Chapter 4 Table for Facility ID Reference
Proposed Bicycle Facilities
Existing Bicycle Facilities
!!
Figure 5-9e
AÙ
4/1
8
/
2
0
1
7
J
N
M
:
\
M
d
a
t
a
\
1
4
4
8
3
7
\
G
I
S
\
M
X
D
\
A
c
t
i
v
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
\
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
S
i
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
c
e
\
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
A
T
P
C
i
t
y
F
i
g
u
r
e
s
4
_
1
2
_
1
6
\
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
B
i
k
e
w
a
y
M
a
p
s
w
i
t
h
I
D
F
i
n
a
l
\
C
V
A
G
A
T
P
P
a
l
m
S
p
r
i
n
g
s
S
o
u
t
h
I
D
.
m
x
d
CVAG ATP City of Palm Springs - SouthRegionally Significant ATP with Facility ID
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG
¯0 21Miles
m mSee City of Palm Springs - Center
See CVAG ATP Chapter 4 Table for Facility ID Reference
Proposed Bicycle Facilities
Existing Bicycle Facilities
!!
Figure 5-9f
AÙ
!"`$
!"`$
AÙ
UNION
P
A
C
I
F
I
C
R
R
4/1
8
/
2
0
1
7
J
N
M
:
\
M
d
a
t
a
\
1
4
4
8
3
7
\
G
I
S
\
M
X
D
\
A
c
t
i
v
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
\
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
S
i
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
c
e
\
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
A
T
P
C
i
t
y
F
i
g
u
r
e
s
4
_
1
2
_
1
6
\
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
B
i
k
e
w
a
y
M
a
p
s
w
i
t
h
C
l
a
s
s
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
F
i
n
a
l
\
C
V
A
G
A
T
P
R
a
n
c
h
o
M
i
r
a
g
e
n
o
I
D
R
S
C
l
a
s
s
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
.
m
x
d
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG
¯0 21Miles
CVAG ATP City of Rancho MirageRegionally Significant ATP Facilities
Figure 5-10
"#= Proposed Index
"8"7
"2
"6
"9
"10
"11
"12
"13
"14
"16
"17
"18
"19
"20
"3
"1
"4
Bike path
Bike/NEV path
Multipurpose path
Multipurpose NEV path
Bike laneBike/NEV lane
Buffered bike lane
Buffered bike/NEV lane
Colored bike lane
Colored bike/NEV laneColored buffered bike lane
Colored buffered bike/NEV laneDouble colored buffered bike lane
Bike route
Greenback sharrowsBike path (partial)
Bike lanes (partial)Golf path
"21
"22Golf lane
N/A
Proposed Bicycle Facilities Existing Bicycle Facilities
Bike pathMultipurpose path
Sidewalk pathBike lane
Buffered bike lane
Bike route
Greenback sharrows
Bike path (partial)
(!#= Existing Index
(!1
(!3
(!6
(!8
(!5
(!16
(!17
(!18
Colored buffered bike laneColored buffered bike lane/NEV lane(!12
(!13
Bike lanes (partial)
Golf path(!19
(!20
Proposed Transit Bike Parking
Bike Parking
*#Proposed
*#ExistingBike Amenities
*#Proposed
#Existing
*#Bike Locker
##Bike Rack
AÙ
!"`$
!"`$
AÙ
UNION
P
A
C
I
F
I
C
R
R
4/1
8
/
2
0
1
7
J
N
M
:
\
M
d
a
t
a
\
1
4
4
8
3
7
\
G
I
S
\
M
X
D
\
A
c
t
i
v
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
\
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
S
i
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
c
e
\
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
A
T
P
C
i
t
y
F
i
g
u
r
e
s
4
_
1
2
_
1
6
\
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
B
i
k
e
w
a
y
M
a
p
s
w
i
t
h
I
D
F
i
n
a
l
\
C
V
A
G
A
T
P
R
a
n
c
h
o
M
i
r
a
g
e
I
D
.
m
x
d
CVAG ATP City of Rancho MirageRegionally Significant ATP with Facility ID
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG
¯0 21Miles
See CVAG ATP Chapter 4 Table for Facility ID Reference
Proposed Bicycle Facilities
Existing Bicycle Facilities
!!
Figure 5-10a
A¡
!"`$
!"`$
!"`$
UNIONPACIFICRR
4/1
8
/
2
0
1
7
J
N
M
:
\
M
d
a
t
a
\
1
4
4
8
3
7
\
G
I
S
\
M
X
D
\
A
c
t
i
v
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
\
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
S
i
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
c
e
\
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
A
T
P
C
i
t
y
F
i
g
u
r
e
s
4
_
1
2
_
1
6
\
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
B
i
k
e
w
a
y
M
a
p
s
w
i
t
h
C
l
a
s
s
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
F
i
n
a
l
\
C
V
A
G
A
T
P
R
i
v
e
r
s
i
d
e
C
o
u
n
t
y
N
o
r
t
h
n
o
I
D
R
S
C
l
a
s
s
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
.
m
x
d
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG
¯0 21Miles
m mSee County of Riverside - Northeast
AÙ
CVAG ATP Unincorporated Riverside CountyRegionally Significant ATP Facilities
Figure 5-11a
"#= Proposed Index
"8"7
"2
"6
"9
"10
"11
"12
"13
"14
"16
"17
"18
"19
"20
"3
"1
"4
Bike pathBike/NEV path
Multipurpose path Multipurpose NEV path
Bike laneBike/NEV lane
Buffered bike lane
Buffered bike/NEV laneColored bike lane
Colored bike/NEV laneColored buffered bike lane
Colored buffered bike/NEV lane
Double colored buffered bike laneBike route
Greenback sharrowsBike path (partial)
Bike lanes (partial)Golf path
"21
"22Golf laneN/A
Proposed Bicycle Facilities Existing Bicycle Facilities
Bike pathMultipurpose pathSidewalk path
Bike laneBuffered bike lane
Bike route
Greenback sharrows
Bike path (partial)
(!#= Existing Index
(!1
(!3
(!6
(!8
(!5
(!16
(!17
(!18
Colored buffered bike lane
Colored buffered bike lane/NEV lane(!12
(!13
Bike lanes (partial)
Golf path(!19
(!20
Proposed Transit Bike Parking
Bike Parking
*#Proposed
*#ExistingBike Amenities
*#Proposed
#Existing
*#Bike Locker
##Bike Rack
AÌ
!"`$
!"`$
AÌ
AÙ
UNION
P
A
C
I
F
I
C
R
R
4/1
8
/
2
0
1
7
J
N
M
:
\
M
d
a
t
a
\
1
4
4
8
3
7
\
G
I
S
\
M
X
D
\
A
c
t
i
v
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
\
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
S
i
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
c
e
\
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
A
T
P
C
i
t
y
F
i
g
u
r
e
s
4
_
1
2
_
1
6
\
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
B
i
k
e
w
a
y
M
a
p
s
w
i
t
h
C
l
a
s
s
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
F
i
n
a
l
\
C
V
A
G
A
T
P
R
i
v
e
r
s
i
d
e
C
o
u
n
t
y
N
o
r
t
h
E
a
s
t
n
o
I
D
R
S
C
l
a
s
s
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
.
m
x
d
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG
¯0 21Miles
m mSee County of Riverside - North
m mSee County of Riverside - Center CVAG ATP Unincorporated Riverside CountyRegionally Significant ATP Facilities
Figure 5-11b
"#= Proposed Index
"8"7
"2
"6
"9
"10
"11
"12
"13
"14
"16
"17
"18
"19
"20
"3
"1
"4
Bike path
Bike/NEV path
Multipurpose path Multipurpose NEV path
Bike laneBike/NEV lane
Buffered bike lane
Buffered bike/NEV lane
Colored bike lane
Colored bike/NEV laneColored buffered bike lane
Colored buffered bike/NEV lane
Double colored buffered bike lane
Bike route
Greenback sharrowsBike path (partial)
Bike lanes (partial)
Golf path
"21
"22Golf lane
N/A
Proposed Bicycle Facilities Existing Bicycle Facilities
Bike pathMultipurpose path
Sidewalk path
Bike laneBuffered bike lane
Bike route
Greenback sharrows
Bike path (partial)
(!#= Existing Index
(!1
(!3
(!6
(!8
(!5
(!16
(!17
(!18
Colored buffered bike lane
Colored buffered bike lane/NEV lane(!12
(!13
Bike lanes (partial)
Golf path(!19
(!20
Proposed Transit Bike Parking
Bike Parking
*#Proposed
*#ExistingBike Amenities
*#Proposed
#Existing
*#Bike Locker
##Bike Rack
!"`$
!"`$
A¿
AÙ
A¿
AÙ
AÙ
UNIO
N
P
A
C
I
F
I
C
R
R
4/1
8
/
2
0
1
7
J
N
M
:
\
M
d
a
t
a
\
1
4
4
8
3
7
\
G
I
S
\
M
X
D
\
A
c
t
i
v
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
\
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
S
i
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
c
e
\
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
A
T
P
C
i
t
y
F
i
g
u
r
e
s
4
_
1
2
_
1
6
\
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
B
i
k
e
w
a
y
M
a
p
s
w
i
t
h
C
l
a
s
s
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
F
i
n
a
l
\
C
V
A
G
A
T
P
R
i
v
e
r
s
i
d
e
C
o
u
n
t
y
C
e
n
t
e
r
n
o
I
D
R
S
C
l
a
s
s
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
.
m
x
d
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG
¯0 21Miles
m mSee County of Riverside - Northeast
m mSee County of Riverside - South CVAG ATP Unincorporated Riverside CountyRegionally Significant ATP Facilities
Figure 5-11c
"#= Proposed Index
"8"7
"2
"6
"9
"10
"11
"12
"13
"14
"16
"17
"18
"19
"20
"3
"1
"4
Bike path
Bike/NEV path
Multipurpose path Multipurpose NEV path
Bike laneBike/NEV lane
Buffered bike lane
Buffered bike/NEV lane
Colored bike lane
Colored bike/NEV laneColored buffered bike lane
Colored buffered bike/NEV lane
Double colored buffered bike lane
Bike route
Greenback sharrowsBike path (partial)
Bike lanes (partial)
Golf path
"21
"22Golf lane
N/A
Proposed Bicycle Facilities Existing Bicycle Facilities
Bike pathMultipurpose path
Sidewalk path
Bike laneBuffered bike lane
Bike route
Greenback sharrows
Bike path (partial)
(!#= Existing Index
(!1
(!3
(!6
(!8
(!5
(!16
(!17
(!18
Colored buffered bike lane
Colored buffered bike lane/NEV lane(!12
(!13
Bike lanes (partial)
Golf path(!19
(!20
Proposed Transit Bike Parking
Bike Parking
*#Proposed
*#ExistingBike Amenities
*#Proposed
#Existing
*#Bike Locker
##Bike Rack
*#
*#
*#*#*#*#
*#
##
##
##
WhitewaterRiver
CoachellaCanal
66TH AVE
62ND AVE
PI
E
R
C
E
S
T
VA
N
B
U
R
E
N
S
T
CA
L
H
O
U
N
S
T
60TH AVE
HA
R
R
I
S
O
N
S
T
61ST AVE
64TH AVE
63RD AVE
LIN
C
O
L
N
S
T
65TH AVE
JO
H
N
S
O
N
S
T
68TH AVE
GR
A
N
T
S
T
70TH AVEJO
H
N
S
O
N
S
T
LI
N
C
O
L
N
S
T
HA
Y
E
S
S
T
GA
R
F
I
E
L
D
S
T
AR
T
H
U
R
S
T
68TH AVE
DA
L
E
K
I
L
E
R
R
D
65TH AVE
69TH AVE
CL
E
V
E
L
A
N
D
S
T
VA
N
D
E
R
V
E
E
R
R
D
FI
L
L
M
O
R
E
S
T
COAC
H
E
L
L
A
C
A
N
A
L
R
D
PO
L
K
S
T
74TH AVE
HAR
R
I
S
O
N
S
T
81ST AVE
82ST AVE
84ST AVE
JO
H
N
S
O
N
S
T
PARKSIDE DR
SALTON SEA
T
R
A
I
L
COAC
H
E
L
L
A
C
A
N
A
L
R
D
VA
N
B
U
R
E
N
S
T
PO
L
K
ST
62ND AVE
TY
L
E
R
S
T
HARR
I
S
O
N
S
T
BOX C
A
N
Y
O
N
R
D
BU
C
H
A
N
A
N
S
T
PI
E
R
C
E
S
T
""1""1
""1
""1
""16
""6""6
""6
""6
""6
""1
""16
""2
""1
""1 ""1
""22
""6
""6
""6
UNION PACIFIC RR
4/1
8
/
2
0
1
7
J
N
M
:
\
M
d
a
t
a
\
1
4
4
8
3
7
\
G
I
S
\
M
X
D
\
A
c
t
i
v
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
\
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
S
i
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
c
e
\
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
A
T
P
C
i
t
y
F
i
g
u
r
e
s
4
_
1
2
_
1
6
\
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
B
i
k
e
w
a
y
M
a
p
s
w
i
t
h
C
l
a
s
s
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
F
i
n
a
l
\
C
V
A
G
A
T
P
R
i
v
e
r
s
i
d
e
C
o
u
n
t
y
S
o
u
t
h
n
o
I
D
R
S
C
l
a
s
s
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
.
m
x
d
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG
¯0 21Miles
SALTON SEA
A¿AÙ
m mSee County of Riverside - Center
"#= Proposed Index
"8"7
"2
"6
"9
"10
"11
"12
"13
"14
"16
"17
"18
"19
"20
"3
"1
"4
Bike pathBike/NEV path
Multipurpose path Multipurpose NEV path
Bike laneBike/NEV lane
Buffered bike lane
Buffered bike/NEV laneColored bike lane
Colored bike/NEV laneColored buffered bike lane
Colored buffered bike/NEV lane
Double colored buffered bike laneBike route
Greenback sharrowsBike path (partial)
Bike lanes (partial)Golf path
"21
"22Golf lane
N/A
Proposed Bicycle Facilities Existing Bicycle Facilities
Bike pathMultipurpose path
Sidewalk path
Bike lane
Buffered bike lane
Bike route
Greenback sharrows
Bike path (partial)
(!#= Existing Index
(!1
(!3
(!6
(!8
(!5
(!16
(!17
(!18
Colored buffered bike laneColored buffered bike lane/NEV lane(!12
(!13
Bike lanes (partial)
Golf path(!19
(!20
Proposed Transit Bike Parking
Bike Parking
*#Proposed
*#ExistingBike Amenities
*#Proposed
#Existing
*#Bike Locker
##Bike Rack
CVAG ATP Unincorporated Riverside CountyRegionally Significant ATP Facilities
Figure 5-11d
Color
a
d
o
Riv
e
r
LO
V
E
K
I
N
BL
V
D
20THAVE
BR
O
A
D
W
A
Y
S
HOBSON WAY
10TH AVE
SEELEY AVE
14TH AVE
DEFRAIN
BLVD
INTAKE
BLVD
AR
R
O
W
H
E
A
D
BL
V
D 18THAVE
RIVERSIDEAVE
6THAVE
DST15TH AVE
ST
E
P
H
E
N
S
O
N
BL
V
D
MIDLANDRD
5THAVE
4THAVE
8THAVE
2NDAVE
ME
G
I
N
AV
E
7THAVEDA
V
E
S
T
BU
C
K
BL
V
D
9THAVE
ODENWAY
3RDAVE
KE
I
M
B
L
V
D
11THAVE
ARZCRR
ARZC R
R
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG
¯0 21Miles
!"`$
IÄ
A¸
CVAG ATP Unincorporated Riverside CountyRegionally Significant ATP Facilities
Figure 5-11e
"#= Proposed Index
"8"7
"2
"6
"9
"10
"11
"12
"13
"14
"16
"17
"18
"19
"20
"3
"1
"4
Bike path
Bike/NEV path
Multipurpose path
Multipurpose NEV path
Bike laneBike/NEV lane
Buffered bike lane
Buffered bike/NEV lane
Colored bike lane
Colored bike/NEV laneColored buffered bike lane
Colored buffered bike/NEV laneDouble colored buffered bike lane
Bike route
Greenback sharrowsBike path (partial)
Bike lanes (partial)Golf path
"21
"22Golf lane
N/A
Proposed Bicycle Facilities Existing Bicycle Facilities
Bike pathMultipurpose path
Sidewalk pathBike lane
Buffered bike lane
Bike route
Greenback sharrows
Bike path (partial)
(!#= Existing Index
(!1
(!3
(!6
(!8
(!5
(!16
(!17
(!18
Colored buffered bike laneColored buffered bike lane/NEV lane(!12
(!13
Bike lanes (partial)
Golf path(!19
(!20
Proposed Transit Bike Parking
Bike Parking
*#Proposed
*#ExistingBike Amenities
*#Proposed
#Existing
*#Bike Locker
##Bike Rack
A¡
!"`$
!"`$
!"`$
UNION PACIFICRR
4/1
8
/
2
0
1
7
J
N
M
:
\
M
d
a
t
a
\
1
4
4
8
3
7
\
G
I
S
\
M
X
D
\
A
c
t
i
v
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
\
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
S
i
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
c
e
\
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
A
T
P
C
i
t
y
F
i
g
u
r
e
s
4
_
1
2
_
1
6
\
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
B
i
k
e
w
a
y
M
a
p
s
w
i
t
h
I
D
F
i
n
a
l
\
C
V
A
G
A
T
P
R
i
v
e
r
s
i
d
e
C
o
u
n
t
y
N
o
r
t
h
I
D
.
m
x
d
CVAG ATP Unincorporated Riverside CountyRegionally Significant ATP with Facility ID
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG
¯0 21Miles
m mSee County of Riverside - Northeast
AÙ
See CVAG ATP Chapter 4 Table for Facility ID Reference
Proposed Bicycle Facilities
Existing Bicycle Facilities
!!
Figure 5-11f
A
!$
CVAG ATP Unincorporated Riverside County
Regionally Significant ATP with Facility ID
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG
¯0 21
Miles
m mSee County of Riverside - North
m mSee County of Riverside - Center
See CVAG ATP Chapter 4
Table for Facility ID Reference
Proposed Bicycle Facilities
Existing Bicycle Facilities
!!
Figure 5-11fFigure 5-11g
!"`$
!"`$
A¿
AÙ
A¿
AÙ
AÙ
UNIONPACIFICRR
4/1
8
/
2
0
1
7
J
N
M
:
\
M
d
a
t
a
\
1
4
4
8
3
7
\
G
I
S
\
M
X
D
\
A
c
t
i
v
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
\
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
S
i
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
c
e
\
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
A
T
P
C
i
t
y
F
i
g
u
r
e
s
4
_
1
2
_
1
6
\
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
B
i
k
e
w
a
y
M
a
p
s
w
i
t
h
I
D
F
i
n
a
l
\
C
V
A
G
A
T
P
R
i
v
e
r
s
i
d
e
C
o
u
n
t
y
C
e
n
t
e
r
I
D
.
m
x
d
CVAG ATP Unincorporated Riverside CountyRegionally Significant ATP with Facility ID
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG
¯0 21Miles
m mSee County of Riverside - Northeast
m mSee County of Riverside - SouthSee CVAG ATP Chapter 4 Table for Facility ID Reference
Proposed Bicycle Facilities
Existing Bicycle Facilities
!!
Figure 5-11h
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!!!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!!!!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!!!
!
!
!WhitewaterRiver
CoachellaCanal
RI
V
9
9
RIV116
RIV38
RIV
1
1
4
RIV
9
5
RIV
6
1
RI
V
8
7
RIV
1
1
3
RIV36
RIV55
RIV46
RI
V
1
0
0
RIV
1
1
5
RIV52
RIV43
RIV
1
0
9
!(
RI
V
1
0
8
!(
RIV44!(
RIV45 RIV42
RIV
7
4
RI
V
1
0
3
RIV
1
0
4
RI
V
9
4
RIV49
RIV112
!(
RIV
6
9
RIV51RI
V
1
0
5
RIV
9
6
RI
V
9
7
RIV91
RIV39
RIV40
RIV54
RIV7
6
RIV53
RIV
9
8
RIV
1
0
6
RIV37
RIV110
RIV
1
0
7
RIV
6
7
RIV41
!(RIV68
RIV
8
8
RIV50
RIV48
RIV111
RIV47
RIV11
RIV
6
5
RIV89RIV90
RIV22
RIV
8
0
RIV32
H11133
RIV77
RIV141
RIV
6
0
RI
V
3
0
RIV
1
0
1
RIV17
!(
RIV56
RIV
1
0
2
B
RIV90A RIV90B
RIV
9
3
!(RIV
9
3
RIV12
66TH AVE
62ND AVE
PI
E
R
C
E
S
T
VA
N
B
U
R
E
N
S
T
CA
L
H
O
U
N
S
T
60TH AVE
HA
R
R
I
S
O
N
S
T
61ST AVE
64TH AVE
63RD AVE
LIN
C
O
L
N
S
T
65TH AVE
JO
H
N
S
O
N
S
T
68TH AVE
GR
A
N
T
S
T
70TH AVEJO
H
N
S
O
N
S
T
LI
N
C
O
L
N
S
T
HA
Y
E
S
S
T
GA
R
F
I
E
L
D
S
T
AR
T
H
U
R
S
T
68TH AVE
DA
L
E
K
I
L
E
R
R
D
65TH AVE
69TH AVE
CL
E
V
E
L
A
N
D
S
T
VA
N
D
E
R
V
E
E
R
R
D
FI
L
L
M
O
R
E
S
T
COAC
H
E
L
L
A
C
A
N
A
L
R
D
PO
L
K
S
T
74TH AVE
HAR
R
I
S
O
N
S
T
81ST AVE
82ST AVE
84ST AVE
JO
H
N
S
O
N
S
T
PARKSIDE DR
SALTON SEA
T
R
A
I
L
COAC
H
E
L
L
A
C
A
N
A
L
R
D
VA
N
B
U
R
E
N
S
T
PO
L
K
ST
62ND AVE
TY
L
E
R
S
T
HARR
I
S
O
N
S
T
BOX C
A
N
Y
O
N
R
D
BU
C
H
A
N
A
N
S
T
PI
E
R
C
E
S
T
UNIONPACIFICRR
4/1
8
/
2
0
1
7
J
N
M
:
\
M
d
a
t
a
\
1
4
4
8
3
7
\
G
I
S
\
M
X
D
\
A
c
t
i
v
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
\
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
S
i
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
c
e
\
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
A
T
P
C
i
t
y
F
i
g
u
r
e
s
4
_
1
2
_
1
6
\
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
B
i
k
e
w
a
y
M
a
p
s
w
i
t
h
I
D
F
i
n
a
l
\
C
V
A
G
A
T
P
R
i
v
e
r
s
i
d
e
C
o
u
n
t
y
S
o
u
t
h
I
D
.
m
x
d
CVAG ATP Unincorporated Riverside CountyRegionally Significant ATP with Facility ID
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG Figure 5-11i
¯0 21Miles
SALTON SEA
A¿AÙ
m mSee County of Riverside - Center
See CVAG ATP Chapter 4 Table for Facility ID Reference
Proposed Bicycle Facilities
Existing Bicycle Facilities
!!
Color
a
d
o
Riv
e
r
LO
V
E
K
I
N
BL
V
D
20THAVE
BR
O
A
D
W
A
Y
S
HOBSON WAY
10TH AVE
SEELEY AVE
14TH AVE
DEFRAIN
BLVD
INTAKE
BLVD
AR
R
O
W
H
E
A
D
BL
V
D 18THAVE
RIVERSIDEAVE
6THAVE
DST15TH AVE
ST
E
P
H
E
N
S
O
N
BL
V
D
MIDLANDRD
5THAVE
4THAVE
8THAVE
2NDAVE
ME
G
I
N
AV
E
7THAVEDA
V
E
S
T
BU
C
K
BL
V
D
9THAVE
ODENWAY
3RDAVE
KE
I
M
B
L
V
D
11THAVE
ARZCRR
ARZC R
R
CVAG ATP Unincorporated Riverside CountyRegionally Significant ATP with Facility ID
Source: County of Riverside, CVAG
¯0 21Miles
!"`$
IÄ
A¸
See CVAG ATP Chapter 4 Table for Facility ID Reference
Proposed Bicycle Facilities
Existing Bicycle Facilities
!!
Figure 5-11j
Page 6-1
INTRODUCTION
SunLine Transit provides the Coachella Valley with bus service. It
runs 15 lines throughout the valley. There are four locations where
at least two lines meet and passengers can transfer between bus
lines. Table 6-1 shows these locations and the bus lines served by
them. No public transit operator currently provides transit services
in the Palo Verde Valley.
Table 6-1. Four Major Transit Transfer Points
Transfer Point City Bus Lines
A. Palm Canyon Dr. @ Baristo
Rd. Palm Springs 14, 30, 111
B. Baristo Rd. @ Farrell Dr. Palm Springs 14, 30, 24
C. B St. @ Buddy Rogers Ave. Cathedral City 30, 111
D. Town Center Way @ Hahn
Rd. Palm Desert 32, 53, 54,
111, 220
Plans for improving pedestrian access to each of these transfer
points are discussed in the following text.
Page 6-2
A. PALM CANYON DRIVE AT BARISTO ROAD, PALM SPRINGS
Page 6-3
Figure 6-A. Pedestrian Improvements to Major Transit Hubs: Palm Springs
Page 6-4
A1. Palm Canyon Drive and Tahquitz Canyon Way
Existing
Signalized intersection
Curb extensions on the south, east, and west legs
Textured crosswalks
Advance stop lines on all legs
Proposed
Add color to all the crosswalks (4)
Add perpendicular ramps to existing curb extensions (5)
Add countdown signals to all legs (8)
Add audio signals to all legs (8)
Remove push buttons on pedestrian heads (8)
Add leading pedestrian intervals to all legs (4)
Design of this improvement will have to coordinate with design of bikeway or
protected bike lanes on Palm Canyon Drive. All curb extensions would be
moved out to the protective islands as protected bike lanes are installed.
Proposed Improvements for Palm Canyon Drive and Tahquitz
Canyon Way
Page 6-5
A2. Palm Canyon Drive and Arenas Road
Existing
Signalized intersection
Curb extensions on the north, south, and east legs
Transverse-line crosswalks on all legs
Proposed
Add zebra-stripe crosswalks to all legs (4)
Add advance stop lines to north, east, and west legs (3)
Add countdown signals to all legs (8)
Add audio signals to all legs (8)
Remove push buttons on pedestrian heads (8)
Add a protected left turn on the south leg for pedestrians
crossing the east leg (1)
Design of this improvement will have to coordinate with design of bikeway or
protected bike lanes on Palm Canyon Drive. All curb extensions would be
moved out to the protective islands as protected bike lanes are installed.
Proposed Improvements for Palm Canyon Drive and Arenas
Road
Page 6-6
A3. Palm Canyon Drive and Baristo Road
Existing
Signalized intersection
Curb extensions on the north leg
Transverse-line crosswalks on all legs
Countdown signals
Proposed
Add zebra-stripe crosswalks to all legs (4)
Add advance stop lines to north, east, and west legs (3)
Add audio signals to all legs (8)
Remove push buttons on pedestrian heads (8)
Add curb extensions on the east, west, and south
(southeast corner) legs (5)
Add a bus bulb on the south leg on the southwest
corner (1)
Add a protected left turn on the south leg for pedestrians
crossing the east leg (1)
Design of this improvement will have to coordinate with design of bikeway or
protected bike lanes on Palm Canyon Drive. All curb extensions would be
moved out to the protective islands as protected bike lanes are installed.
Proposed Improvements for Palm Canyon Drive and Baristo
Road
Page 6-7
A4. Baristo Road and Belardo Road
Existing
Four-way stop
Proposed
Add zebra-stripe crosswalks to all legs (4)
Add advance stop lines to all legs (4)
Add curb extensions to the east and west legs (4)
Add curb extensions to the north leg on the northeast
corner to cross Belardo Road (1)
Proposed Improvements for Baristo Road and Belardo Road
Page 6-8
A5. Palm Canyon Drive and Ramon Road
Existing
Signalized intersection
Transverse-line crosswalks on all legs
Countdown signals
Protected left turns on the east and west legs
Proposed
Add zebra-stripe crosswalks to all legs (4)
Add advance stop lines to north, east, and west legs (3)
Add audio signals to all legs (8)
Remove push buttons on pedestrian heads (8)
Add curb extensions on the north and south (southeast
corner) legs (3)
Add a bus bulb on the south leg on the southwest
corner (1)
Add a protected left turn on the south leg for pedestrians
crossing the east leg (1)
Design of this improvement will have to coordinate with design of bikeway or
protected bike lanes on Palm Canyon Drive. All curb extensions would be
moved out to the protective islands as protected bike lanes are installed.
Proposed Improvements for Palm Canyon Drive and Ramon
Road
Page 6-9
A6. Palm Canyon Drive and Camino Parocela and
Indian Canyon Drive
Existing
Signalized intersection
Pedestrian crossings only on the east, west, and south legs
Transverse-line crosswalks on all legs
Proposed
Add zebra-stripe crosswalks to all legs (includes a new
marked crosswalk on the north leg) (4)
Add advance stop lines to all legs (4)
Add audio signals to all legs (8)
Add an island on the south leg (1)
Add large curb extensions on the northeast and northwest
corners (2)
Reduce the curb return on the southeast corner (1)
Design of this improvement will have to coordinate with design of bikeway or
protected bike lanes on Palm Canyon Drive and Indian Canyon Drive. All
curb extensions would be moved out to the protective islands as protected bike
lanes are installed.
Proposed Improvements for Palm Canyon Drive and Camino
Parocela and Indian Canyon Drive
Page 6-10
A7. Indian Canyon Drive and Ramon Road
Existing
Signalized intersection
Transverse-line crosswalks on all legs
Proposed
Add zebra-stripe crosswalks to all legs (4)
Add advance stop lines to south, east, and west legs (3)
Add countdown signals to all legs (8)
Add audio signals to all legs (8)
Add curb extensions on the north and south legs (4)
Add protected left turns on the north and west legs for
pedestrians crossing the west and north legs (2)
Design of this improvement will have to coordinate with design of bikeway or
protected bike lanes on Indian Canyon Drive. All curb extensions would be
moved out to the protective islands as protected bike lanes are installed.
Proposed Improvements for Indian Canyon Drive and Ramon
Road
Page 6-11
A8. Indian Canyon Drive and Baristo Road
Existing
T-intersection
Signalized intersection
Transverse-line crosswalks on the south and west legs
Proposed
Add zebra-stripe bicycle/pedestrian crosswalks to the
north and south legs (assumes that the bike path will go in
along the channel on the east side) (2)
Add a zebra-stripe crosswalk to the west leg (1)
Add advance stop lines to south and west legs (2)
Add countdown signals to all legs (6)
Add audio signals to all legs (6)
Design of this improvement will have to coordinate with design of bikeway or
protected bike lanes on Indian Canyon Drive.
Proposed Improvements for Indian Canyon Drive and Baristo
Road
Page 6-12
A9. Indian Canyon Drive and Arenas Road
Existing
Signalized intersection
Countdown signals
Transverse-line crosswalks on the north, south, and west
legs
Concrete crosswalk on the east leg
Curb extensions on the northeast corner of the north leg
and on the southeast corner of the east leg
Proposed
Add zebra-stripe crosswalks to all legs (4)
Add advance stop lines to south, east, and west legs (3)
Add audio signals to all legs (8)
Add curb extensions on the north (northwest corner),
south, and west legs (5)
Design of this improvement will have to coordinate with design of bikeway or
protected bike lanes on Indian Canyon Drive. All curb extensions would be
moved out to the protective islands as protected bike lanes are installed.
Proposed Improvements for Indian Canyon Drive and Arenas
Road
Page 6-13
A10. Indian Canyon Drive and Tahquitz Canyon
Way
Existing
Signalized intersection
Countdown signals
Transverse-line crosswalks on all legs
Proposed
Add zebra-stripe crosswalks to all legs (4)
Add advance stop lines to south, east, and west legs (3)
Add audio signals to all legs (8)
Add curb extensions to all legs (8)
Remove push buttons on pedestrian heads (8)
Design of this improvement will have to coordinate with design of bikeway or
protected bike lanes on Indian Canyon Drive. All curb extensions would be
moved out to the protective islands as protected bike lanes are installed.
Proposed Improvements for Indian Canyon Drive and Tahquitz
Canyon Way
Page 6-14
B. BARISTO ROAD AT FARRELL DRIVE, PALM SPRINGS
Page 6-15
Figure 6-B. Pedestrian Improvements to Major Transit Hubs: Palm Springs
Page 6-16
Farrell Drive from Tahquitz Canyon Way to Ramon Road, and
Baristo Road from Sunrise Way to El Cielo Road
No streetlights exist except at signalized intersections
Add sidewalk-level streetlights (3 miles)
South Side of Baristo Road from El Cielo Road to Farrell Drive
No sidewalks, curb, or gutter
Add sidewalks with curb and gutter (approximately 2,150
feet)
North Side of Baristo Road from Pavilion Way to 320 Feet East
No sidewalks, but curb exists
Add sidewalks (approximately 350 feet)
B1. Baristo Road and Farrell Drive
Existing
Signalized intersection
Yellow ladder crosswalks on all legs
Countdown signals on Farrell Drive
Audio signals
Proposed
Add advance stop lines to all legs (4)
Add countdown signals to the east and west legs (4)
Add protected left turns on all legs (4)
Add a curb extension on the southeast corner to cross
Baristo Road (1)
Replace the right turn lane on the southwest corner with a
wide curb extension to cross Baristo Road (1)
Proposed Improvements for Baristo Road and Farrell Drive
Page 6-17
B2. Farrell Drive and Tahquitz Canyon Way
Existing
Signalized intersection
Protected left turns
Countdown signals
Audio signals
Transverse-line crosswalks
Proposed
Add zebra-stripe crosswalks to all legs (4)
Add advance stop lines to all legs (4)
Add median noses to the east and west legs (2)
Proposed Improvements for Farrell Drive and Tahquitz Canyon
Way
B3. Baristo Road and El Cielo Road
Existing
Signalized intersection
Countdown signals to cross Baristo Road
Audio signals
Transverse-line crosswalks on north, south, and west legs
Proposed
Add zebra-stripe crosswalks to all legs (4)
Add advance stop lines to all legs (4)
Add countdown signals to cross Farrell Drive (4)
Add curb extensions to the north and south legs (2)
Proposed Improvements for Baristo Road and El Cielo Road
Page 6-18
B4. Baristo Road and Civic Drive
Existing
T-intersection
One-way stop for Civic Drive
Proposed
Add a zebra-stripe crosswalk to the north leg (1)
Add an advance stop line to the north leg (1)
Add curb extensions to the north leg (2)
Proposed Improvements for Baristo Road and Civic Drive
Page 6-19
B5. Baristo Road and Compadre Road
Existing
T-intersection
One-way stop for Compadre Road
Yellow ladder crosswalk on west leg
Proposed
Add a zebra-stripe crosswalk to the south leg (1)
Replace the yellow crosswalk on the west leg with a white
zebra-stripe crosswalk (1)
Add an advance stop line to the south leg (1)
Add a curb extension to the northwest corner of the west
leg (1)
Add overhead lighting of this crosswalk (1 set)
Add advance yield lines to the west leg (2)
Add R1-5 signs to the west leg (2)
Add W11-2 signs with W16-P9 and W16-7P plaques to the
west leg (4)
Proposed Improvements for Baristo Road and Compadre Road
Page 6-20
B6. Baristo Road and the Palm Springs High
School Entrance
Existing
Signalized intersection
Countdown signals
Audio signals
Yellow transverse-line crosswalks
Overhead lighting
Proposed
Add zebra-stripe crosswalks to all legs (4)
Add advance stop lines to all legs (4)
Add raised crosswalks to all legs (4)
Proposed Improvements for Baristo Road and the Palm Springs
High School Entrance
B7. Baristo Road and Cerritos Drive/Pavilion Way
Existing
Four-way stop
No marked crosswalks
Proposed Option 1
Replace the four-way stop with a roundabout
Add overhead lighting of the intersection
Proposed Option 2
Add zebra-stripe crosswalks to all legs (4)
Add advance stop lines to all legs (4)
Add curb extensions to the north and south legs (4)
Add overhead lighting
Proposed Improvements for Baristo Road and Cerritos
Drive/Pavilion Way
Page 6-21
B8. Farrell Drive and Ramon Road
Existing
Signalized intersection
Protected left turns
Audio signals
Transverse-line crosswalks
Proposed
Add zebra-stripe crosswalks to all legs (4)
Add advance stop lines to all legs (4)
Add countdown signals to all legs (8)
Proposed Improvements for Farrell Drive and Ramon Road
Page 6-22
C. B STREET AT BUDDY ROGERS AVENUE, CATHEDRAL CITY
Page 6-23
Figure 6-C. Pedestrian Improvements to Major Transit Hubs: Cathedral City
Page 6-24
Missing sidewalks to be added (curbs and gutter exist)
o Buddy Rogers Avenue from Palm Canyon Drive
to B Street on the east side (approximately 540
feet)
o B Street on the north side from the bus shelter to
farther east (approximately 110 feet)
o W. Buddy Rogers Avenue on the east side from
Palm Canyon Drive to Buddy Rogers Avenue
(becomes George Montgomery Avenue north of
Palm Canyon Drive) (approximately 100 feet)
o W. Buddy Rogers Avenue on the west side from
Palm Canyon Drive to Avenue Lalo Guerrero
(approximately 320 feet)
o Palm Canyon Drive on the north side from Buddy
Rogers Avenue to Cathedral Canyon Drive
(approximately 600 feet)
C1. B Street and Buddy Rogers Avenue
Existing
Four-way stop
No marked crosswalks
Proposed
Add zebra-stripe crosswalks to all legs (4)
Add advance stop lines to all legs (4)
Add curb extensions to the north and south legs (4)
Add overhead lighting (4 units)
Proposed Improvements for B Street and Buddy Rogers
Avenue
Page 6-25
C2. Van Fleet Street/Monty Hall Drive and Palm
Canyon Drive
Existing
Signalized intersection
Protected left turns from Palm Canyon Drive
Transverse-line crosswalks on all legs
Proposed
Add zebra-stripe crosswalks to all legs (4)
Add advance stop lines to all legs (4)
Add countdown signals to all legs (8)
Add audio signals all legs (8)
Replace right turn lane on the southwest corner with a
curb extension to cross Palm Canyon Drive (1)
Add islands on the northwest corner in parallel with the
frontage road islands (1 pair)
Proposed Improvements for Van Fleet Street/Monty Hall Drive
and Palm Canyon Drive
Page 6-26
C3. Palm Canyon Drive and Buddy Rogers Avenue
Existing
Signalized intersection
Transverse-line crosswalks on all legs
No curb ramp on the north leg on the east side
Proposed
Add zebra-stripe crosswalks to all legs (4)
Add advance stop lines to all legs (4)
Add countdown signals to all legs (8)
Add audio signals all legs (8)
Add islands on the northwest corner in parallel with the
frontage road islands (1 pair)
Proposed Improvements for Palm Canyon Drive and Buddy
Rogers Avenue
Page 6-27
C4. Palm Canyon Drive and Cathedral Canyon
Drive
Existing
Signalized intersection
Protected left turns from Palm Canyon Drive
Transverse-line crosswalks on all legs
Curb extension on the northwest corner to cross Palm
Canyon Drive
No ADA-compliant curb ramp on southwest corner
Proposed
Add zebra-stripe crosswalks to all legs (4)
Add advance stop lines to all legs (4)
Add countdown signals to all legs (8)
Add audio signals all legs (8)
Replace right turn lane on southwest corner with a curb
extension to cross Palm Canyon Drive (1)
Proposed Improvements for Palm Canyon Drive and Cathedral
Canyon Drive
Page 6-28
D. TOWN CENTER WAY AT HAHN ROAD, PALM DESERT
Page 6-29
Figure 6-D. Pedestrian Improvements to Major Transit Hubs: Palm Desert
Page 6-30
Fred Waring Drive from Highway 111 to San Pablo Avenue
No street lighting except at intersections
Add pedestrian-level street lighting (1.15 miles)
Town Center Way from Highway 111 to Fred Waring Drive
No street lighting except at intersections
Add pedestrian-level street lighting (0.35 mile)
Highway 111 from Fred Waring Drive to Monterey Avenue
No street lighting except at intersections
Add pedestrian-level street lighting (0.9 mile)
Monterey Avenue from Highway 111 to Fred Waring Drive
No street lighting except at intersections
Add pedestrian-level street lighting (0.5 mile)
D1. Highway 111 and Monterey Avenue
Existing
Signalized intersection
Protected left turns
Countdown signals
Audio signals
Transverse-line crosswalks on all legs
Proposed
Add zebra-stripe crosswalks to all legs (4)
Proposed Improvements for SR 111 and Monterey Avenue
Page 6-31
D2. Monterey Avenue and Hahn Road
Existing
Signalized intersection
Protected left turns from Monterey Avenue
Countdown signals
Audio signals
Transverse-line crosswalks on all legs
Proposed
Add zebra-stripe crosswalks to all legs (4)
Proposed Improvements for Monterey Avenue and Hahn Road
Page 6-32
D3. Town Center Way and Hahn Road
Existing
Signalized intersection
Protected left turns from Town Center Way
Countdown signals
Audio signals
Transverse-line crosswalks on all legs
Proposed
Add zebra-stripe crosswalks to all legs (4)
Proposed Improvements for Town Center Way and Hahn Road
Page 6-33
D4. Monterey Avenue and Fred Waring Drive
Existing
Signalized intersection
Protected left turns on all legs
Countdown signals
Audio signals
Transverse-line crosswalks on all legs
Proposed
Add zebra-stripe crosswalks to all legs (4)
Proposed Improvements for Monterey Avenue and Fred
Waring Drive
Page 6-34
D5. Fred Waring Drive and Town Center Way
Existing
Signalized intersection
Protected left turns on all legs
Countdown signals
Audio signals
Transverse-line crosswalks on all legs
Proposed
Add zebra-stripe crosswalks to all legs (4)
Proposed Improvements for Fred Waring Drive and Town
Center Way
Page 6-35
D6. Highway 111 and Town Center Way
Existing
Signalized intersection
Protected left turns
Countdown signals
Audio signals
Transverse-line crosswalks on all legs
Right turn slip lanes on northwest and southwest corners
Proposed
Add zebra-stripe crosswalks to all legs (4)
Proposed Improvements for SR 111 and Town Center Way
Page 6-36
SUMMARY
A summary of the pedestrian improvements proposed around
these major transit hubs is included in Table 6-2, listed by
municipality. Because these improvements are all planned around
regional transit hubs, they are all considered regionally significant
projects.
Table 6-3 lists improvements for bicycle amenities around the
transit stations, listed by municipality.
Table 6-2. Proposed Pedestrian Improvements by City
ID #Street/Path From To Category Length (mi)Existing Condition Proposed Condition
Regionally
Significant?
Estimated
Cost
CATHEDRAL CITY
PEDC00A Buddy Rogers Ave. Palm Canyon Drive B Street New Sidewalks 0.2 Yes $95,200
PEDC00B B Street (North Side)Bus Shelter Further East New Sidewalks 0.0 Yes $6,000
PEDC00C W. Buddy Rogers Ave (east
side)
Palm Canyon Drive Buddy Rogers Ave
(becomes George
Montgomery Ave north of
Palm Canyon Dr)
New Sidewalks 0.1 Yes $18,000
PEDC00D W. Buddy Rogers Ave (west
side)
Palm Canyon Drive Lalo Guerrero New Sidewalks 0.0 Yes $9,000
PEDC00E Palm Canyon Drive (North
Side)
Buddy Rogers Ave Cathedral Canyon Dr New Sidewalks 0.1 Yes $36,000
C1 B Street and Buddy Rogers
Avenue
N/A - Intersection Project Transit Hub 4-way stop;
No marked crosswalks .
Add zebra-stripe crosswalks to all legs (4);
Add advance stop lines to all legs (4);
Add curb extensions to the north and south
legs (4);
Add overhead lighting (4 units).
Yes $245,700
C2 Van Fleet Street/Monty Hall
Drive and Palm Canyon Drive
N/A - Intersection Project Intersection Project Signalized intersection;
Protected left turns from Palm Canyon Dr.
;
Transverse-line crosswalks on all legs.
Add zebra-stripe crosswalks to all legs (4);
Add advance stop lines to all legs (4);
Add countdown signals to all legs (8);
Add audio signals all legs (8);
Replace right-turn lane on the SW corner
with a curb extension to cross Palm Canyon
Dr. (1);
Add islands on the NW corner in parallel
with the frontage road islands (1 pair).
Yes $163,800
C3 Palm Canyon Drive and Buddy
Rogers Avenue
N/A - Intersection Project Intersection Project Signalized intersection;
Transverse-line crosswalks on all legs;
No curb ramp on the north leg on the east
side.
Add zebra-stripe crosswalks to all legs (4);
Add advance stop lines to all legs (4);
Add countdown signals to all legs (8);
Add audio signals all legs (8);
Add islands on the NW corner in parallel
with the frontage road islands (1 pair).
Yes $81,900
C4 Palm Canyon Drive and
Cathedral Canyon Drive
N/A - Intersection Project Intersection Project Signalized intersection;
Protected left turns from Palm Canyon
Dr.;
Transverse-line crosswalks on all legs;
Curb extension on the NW corner to cross
Palm Canyon Dr.;
No ADA-compliant curb ramp on the SW
corner.
Add zebra-stripe crosswalks to all legs (4);
Add advance stop lines to all legs (4);
Add countdown signals to all legs (8);
Add audio signals all legs (8);
Replace right-turn lane on the SW corner
with a curb extension to cross Palm Canyon
Drive (1).
Yes $81,900
CATHEDRAL CITY TOTAL:$737,500
Table 6-2. Proposed Pedestrian Improvements by City
ID #Street/Path From To Category Length (mi)Existing Condition Proposed Condition
Regionally
Significant?
Estimated
Cost
PALM DESERT
PEDD00A Fred Waring Drive Highway 111 San Pablo Avenue New Pedestrian Level
Street Lighting
1.1 No street lighting except at intersections Add pedestrian level street lighting.Yes $726,000
PEDD00B Town Center Way Highway 111 Fred Waring Drive New Pedestrian Level
Street Lighting
0.4 No street lighting except at intersections Add pedestrian level street lighting.Yes $222,000
PEDD00C Highway 111 Fred Waring Drive Monterey Ave.New Pedestrian Level
Street Lighting
0.9 No street lighting except at intersections Add pedestrian level street lighting.Yes $570,000
PEDD00D Monterey Avenue Highway 111 Fred Waring Drive New Pedestrian Level
Street Lighting
0.5 No street lighting except at intersections Add pedestrian level street lighting.Yes $316,800
D1 Highway 111 and Monterey
Avenue
N/A - Intersection Project Intersection Project Signalized intersection;
Protected left turns;
Countdown signals;
Audio signals;
Transverse-line crosswalks on all legs.
Add zebra-stripe crosswalks to all legs (4)Yes $81,900
D2 Monterey Avenue and Hahn
Road
N/A - Intersection Project Intersection Project Signalized intersection;
Protected left turns from Monterey Ave.;
Countdown signals;
Audio signals;
Transverse-line crosswalks on all legs.
Add zebra-stripe crosswalks to all legs (4)Yes $81,900
D3 Town Center Way and Hahn
Road
N/A - Intersection Project Transit Hub Signalized intersection;
Protected left turns from Town Center
Way;
Countdown signals;
Audio signals;
Transverse-line crosswalks on all legs.
Add zebra-stripe crosswalks to all legs (4)Yes $81,900
D4 Monterey Avenue and Fred
Waring Drive
N/A - Intersection Project Intersection Project Signalized intersection;
Protected left turns on all legs;
Countdown signals;
Audio signals;
Transverse-line crosswalks on all legs.
Add zebra-stripe crosswalks to all legs (4)Yes $81,900
Table 6-2. Proposed Pedestrian Improvements by City
ID #Street/Path From To Category Length (mi)Existing Condition Proposed Condition
Regionally
Significant?
Estimated
Cost
D5 Fred Waring Drive and Town
Center Way
N/A - Intersection Project Intersection Project Signalized intersection;
Protected left turns on all legs;
Countdown signals;
Audio signals;
Transverse-line crosswalks on all legs.
Add zebra-stripe crosswalks to all legs (4)Yes $81,900
D6 Highway 111 and Town Center
Way
N/A - Intersection Project Intersection Project Signalized intersection;
Protected left turns;
Countdown signals;
Audio signals;
Transverse-line crosswalks on all legs;
Right-turn slip lanes on NW and SW
corners.
Add zebra-stripe crosswalks to all legs (4)Yes $81,900
PALM DESERT TOTAL:$2,326,200
PALM SPRINGS
A1 Palm Canyon Drive and
Tahquitz Canyon Way
N/A - Intersection Project Intersection Project Signalized intersection;
Curb extensions on the south, east and
west legs;
Textured crosswalks;
Advance stop lines on all legs.
Add color to all the crosswalks (4);
Add perpendicular ramps to existing curb
extensions (5);
Add countdown signals to all legs (8);
Add audio signals to all legs (8);
Remove push buttons on pedestrian heads
(8);
Add leading pedestrian intervals to all legs
(4).
Yes $245,700
A2 Palm Canyon Drive and Arenas
Road
N/A - Intersection Project Intersection Project Signalized intersection;
Curb extensions on the north, south and
east legs;
Transverse-line crosswalks on all legs.
Add zebra-stripe crosswalks to all legs (4);
Add advance stop lines to north, east, and
west legs (3);
Add countdown signals to all legs (8);
Add audio signals to all legs (8);
Remove push buttons on pedestrian heads
(8);
Add a protected left turn on the south leg for
pedestrians crossing the east leg (1).
Yes $245,700
Table 6-2. Proposed Pedestrian Improvements by City
ID #Street/Path From To Category Length (mi)Existing Condition Proposed Condition
Regionally
Significant?
Estimated
Cost
A3 Palm Canyon Drive and Baristo
Road
N/A - Intersection Project Transit Hub Signalized intersection
Curb extensions on the north leg;
Transverse-line crosswalks on all legs;
Countdown signals.
Add zebra-stripe crosswalks to all legs (4);
Add advance stop lines to north, east, and
west legs (3);
Add audio signals to all legs (8);
Remove push buttons on pedestrian heads
(8);
Add curb extensions on the east, west and
south (SE corner) legs (5);
Add a bus bulb on the south leg on the SW
corner (1);
Add a protected left turn on the south leg for
pedestrians crossing the east leg (1).
Yes $245,700
A4 Baristo Road and Belardo Road N/A - Intersection Project Intersection Project 4-way stop Add zebra-stripe crosswalks to all legs (4);
Add advance stop lines to all legs (4);
Add curb extensions to the east and west
legs (4);
Add curb extensions to the north leg on the
NE corner to cross Belardo Rd. (1).
Yes $163,800
A5 Palm Canyon Drive and Ramon
Road
N/A - Intersection Project Intersection Project Signalized intersection;
Transverse-line crosswalks on all legs;
Countdown signals;
Protected left-turns on the east and west
legs.
Add zebra-stripe crosswalks to all legs (4);
Add advance stop lines to north, east, and
west legs (3);
Add audio signals to all legs (8);
Remove push buttons on pedestrian heads
(8);
Add curb extensions on the north and south
(SE corner) legs (3);
Add a bus bulb on the south leg on the SW
corner (1);
Add a protected left turn on the south leg for
pedestrians crossing the east leg (1).
Yes $245,700
A6 Palm Canyon Drive and Camino
Parocela and Indian Canyon
Drive
N/A - Intersection Project Intersection Project Signalized intersection;
Pedestrian crossings only on the east,
west and south legs;
Transverse-line crosswalks on all legs.
Add zebra-stripe crosswalks to all legs (this
includes a new marked crosswalk on the
north leg) (4)
Add advance stop lines to all legs (4);
Add audio signals to all legs (8);
Add an island on the south leg (1);
Add large curb extensions on the NE and NW
corners (2);
Reduce the curb return on the SE corner (1).
Yes $245,700
Table 6-2. Proposed Pedestrian Improvements by City
ID #Street/Path From To Category Length (mi)Existing Condition Proposed Condition
Regionally
Significant?
Estimated
Cost
A7 Indian Canyon Drive and
Ramon Road
N/A - Intersection Project Intersection Project Signalized intersection;
Transverse-line crosswalks on all legs.
Add zebra-stripe crosswalks to all legs (4);
Add advance stop lines to south, east and
west legs (3);
Add countdown signals to all legs (8);
Add audio signals to all legs (8);
Add curb extensions on the north and south
legs (4);
Add protected left turns on the north and
west legs pedestrians crossing the west and
north legs (2).
Yes $245,700
A8 Indian Canyon Drive and
Baristo Road
N/A - Intersection Project Intersection Project T-intersection;
Signalized intersection;
Transverse-line crosswalks on the south
and west legs.
Add zebra-stripe bicycle/pedestrian
crosswalks to the north and south legs
(assumes that the bike path will go in along
the channel on the east side) (2);
Add a zebra-stripe crosswalk to the west leg
(1);
Add advance stop lines to south and west
legs (2);
Add countdown signals to all legs (6);
Add audio signals to all legs (6).
Yes $245,700
A9 Indian Canyon Drive and
Arenas Road
N/A - Intersection Project Intersection Project Signalized intersection;
Countdown signals;
Transverse-line crosswalks on the north,
south and west legs;
Concrete crosswalk on the east leg;
Curb extensions on the NE corner of the
north leg, and on the SE corner of the east
leg.
Add zebra-stripe crosswalks to all legs (4);
Add advance stop lines to south, east and
west legs (3);
Add audio signals to all legs (8);
Add curb extensions on the north (NW
corner), south and west legs (5).
Yes $327,600
A10 Indian Canyon Drive and
Tahquitz Canyon Way
N/A - Intersection Project Intersection Project Signalized intersection;
Countdown signals;
Transverse-line crosswalks on all legs.
Add zebra-stripe crosswalks to all legs (4);
Add advance stop lines to south, east and
west legs (3);
Add audio signals to all legs (8);
Add curb extensions to all legs (8);
Remove push buttons on pedestrian heads
(8).
Yes $327,600
PEDB00A Farrell Drive Tahquitz Canyon Way Ramon Road New Pedestrian Level
Street Lighting
0.5 No street lights except at signalized
intersections.
Add sidewalk level streetlights.Yes $120
PEDB00B Baristo Road Sunrise Way El Cielo Road New Pedestrian Level
Street Lighting
1.0 No street lights except at signalized
intersections.
Add sidewalk level streetlights.Yes $120
PEDB00C Baristo Road (South Side)El Cielo Road Farrell Drive New Sidewalks, Curbs,
and Gutters
0.4 No sidewalks, curb, or gutter.Add sidewalks with curb and gutter.Yes $93
PEDB00D Baristo Road (North Side)Pavilion Way 320' East New Sidewalks 0.1 No sidewalks, but curb exists.Add sidewalks.Yes $60
Table 6-2. Proposed Pedestrian Improvements by City
ID #Street/Path From To Category Length (mi)Existing Condition Proposed Condition
Regionally
Significant?
Estimated
Cost
B1 Baristo Road and Farrell Drive N/A - Intersection Project Transit Hub Signalized intersection;
Yellow ladder crosswalks on all legs;
Countdown signals on Farrell Dr.;
Audio signals .
Add advance stop lines to all legs (4);
Add countdown signals to the east and west
leg (4);
Add protected left turns on all legs (4);
Add a curb extension on the SE corner to
cross Baristo Rd. (1);
Replace the right-turn lane on the SW corner
with a wide curb extension to cross Baristo
Rd. (1).
Yes $327,600
B2 Farrell Drive and Tahquitz
Canyon Way
N/A - Intersection Project Intersection Project Signalized intersection;
Protected left turns;
Countdown signals;
Audio signals;
Transverse-line crosswalks.
Add zebra-stripe crosswalks to all legs (4);
Add advance stop lines to all legs (4);
Add median noses to the east and west legs
(2).
Yes $81,900
B3 Baristo Road and Cielo Road N/A - Intersection Project Intersection Project Signalized intersection;
Countdown signals to cross Baristo Rd.;
Audio signals;
Transverse-line crosswalks on north, south
and west legs.
Add zebra-stripe crosswalks to all legs (4);
Add advance stop lines to all legs (4);
Add countdown signals to cross Farrell Dr.
(4);
Add curb extensions to the north and south
legs (2).
Yes $163,800
B4 Baristo Road and Civic Drive N/A - Intersection Project Intersection Project T-intersection;
1-way stop for Civic Dr..
Add a zebra-stripe crosswalk to the north leg
(1);
Add an advance stop line to the north leg (1);
Add curb extensions to the north leg (2).
Yes $81,900
B5 Baristo Road and Compadre
Road
N/A - Intersection Project Intersection Project T-intersection;
1-way stop for Compadre Rd.;
Yellow ladder crosswalk on west leg.
Add a zebra-stripe crosswalk to the south leg
(1);
Replace the yellow crosswalk on the west leg
with a white zebra-stripe crosswalk (1);
Add an advance stop line to the south leg (1);
Add a curb extension to the NW corner of
the west leg (1);
Add overhead lighting of this crosswalk (1
set);
Add advance yield lines to the west leg (2);
Add R1-5 signs to the west leg (2);
Add W11-2 signs with (W16-P9) and (W16-
7P) plaques to the west leg (4).
Yes $81,900
Table 6-2. Proposed Pedestrian Improvements by City
ID #Street/Path From To Category Length (mi)Existing Condition Proposed Condition
Regionally
Significant?
Estimated
Cost
B6 Baristo Road and the Palm
Springs High School Entrance
N/A - Intersection Project Intersection Project Signalized intersection;
Countdown signals;
Audio signals;
Yellow transverse-line crosswalks;
Overhead lighting.
Add zebra-stripe crosswalks to all legs (4);
Add advance stop lines to all legs (4);
Add raised crosswalks to all legs (4).
Yes $163,800
B7 Baristo Road and Cerritos
Drive/Pavilion Way
N/A - Intersection Project Intersection Project 4-way stop;
No marked crosswalks.
Proposed Option 1:
Replace the 4-way stop with a roundabout;
Add overhead lighting of the intersection.
Proposed Option 2:
Add zebra-stripe crosswalks to all legs (4);
Add advance stop lines to all legs (4);
Add curb extensions to the north and south
legs (4);
Add overhead lighting.
Yes $245,700
B8 Farrell Drive and Ramon Road N/A - Intersection Project Intersection Project Signalized intersection;
Protected left turns;
Audio signals;
Transverse-line crosswalks.
Add zebra-stripe crosswalks to all legs (4);
Add advance stop lines to all legs (4);
Add countdown signals to all legs (8).
Yes $81,900
PALM SPRINGS TOTAL:$3,767,793
Table 6-3. Proposed Transit Stop Bike Amenities by City
ID #Line Street Cross Street Stop #Direction
Position
(NS: Near Side;
FS: Far Side)Amenity Type
CATHEDRAL CITY
BUS_CC06 30 Date Palm Dr.Ramon Rd.517 SB FS Bike Rack
BUS_CC07 30 Ramon Rd.Date Palm Dr.596 WB FS Bike Rack
BUS_CC01 32 Vista Chino Landau Blvd.160 EB NS Bike Rack
BUS_CC02 32 Vista Chino Landau Blvd.167 WB FS Bike Rack
BUS_CC04 32 Date Palm Dr.30th Ave.274 SB FS Bike Rack
BUS_CC05 32 30th Ave.Date Palm Dr.278 WB FS Bike Rack
BUS_CC03 31/ 111 B St.Buddy Rogers 147 WB NS Bike Locker
COACHELLA
BUS_COA05 90 Orchard Ave.5th St.452 SB NS Bike Rack
BUS_COA06 90 Van Buren St.Ave 50 453 NB FS Bike Rack
BUS_COA08 90 7th St.Orchard Ave.968 EB FS Bike Rack
BUS_COA01 91 Harrison St.Grapefruit Blvd.304 SB FS Bike Rack
BUS_COA02 91 Harrison St.Grapefruit Blvd.305 NB FS Bike Rack
BUS_COA04 90/111 Orchard Ave.5th St.361 NB FS Bike Rack
BUS_COA09 90/111 7th St.Orchard Ave.514 WB NS Bike Rack
BUS_COA03 90/91 Harrison St.Ave 50 356 SB FS Bike Rack
BUS_COA07 90/91 Harrison St.Ave 50 815 NB NS Bike Rack
DESERT HOT SPRINGS
BUS_DHS01 14 Palm Dr.Two Bunch Palms Dr.1 NB NS Bike Rack
BUS_DHS02 14 Palm Dr.Hacienda Ave.2 NB NS Bike Rack
BUS_DHS05 14 Palm Dr.Buena Vista Ave.621 NB NS Bike Rack
BUS_DHS06 14 Palm Dr.Pierson Blvd.763 SB NS Bike Rack
BUS_DHS07 14 Palm Dr.Two Bunch Palms Dr.765 SB FS Bike Rack
BUS_DHS08 14 Palm Dr.1St St.822 NB FS Bike Rack
BUS_DHS09 15 Hacienda Ave.Don English Way 859 WB FS Bike Rack
BUS_DHS03 14/15 Palm Dr.Hacienda Ave 5 SB FS Bike Rack
BUS_DHS04 14/15 Palm Dr.Buena Vista Ave.483 SB NS Bike Rack
INDIAN WELLS
Table 6-3. Proposed Transit Stop Bike Amenities by City
ID #Line Street Cross Street Stop #Direction
Position
(NS: Near Side;
FS: Far Side)Amenity Type
BUS_IW03 111 Hwy 111 Indian Wells Ln.544 EB FS Bike Rack
BUS_IW04 111 Hwy 111 Indian Wells Ln.564 WB FS Bike Rack
BUS_IW01 111/53 Hwy 111 Village Center Dr.253 EB FS Bike Rack
BUS_IW02 111/53 Hwy 111 Village Center Dr.254 WB NS Bike Rack
INDIO
BUS_INDIO06 80 Ave 48 Jackson St.374 WB FS Bike Rack
BUS_INDIO08 81 Ave 44 Jackson St.790 WB FS Bike Rack
BUS_INDIO02 111 Hwy 111 Monroe St.100 WB MB Bike Rack
BUS_INDIO07 111 Hwy 111 Monroe St.550 EB FS Bike Rack
BUS_INDIO01 111/ 80 Hwy 111 Dr. Carreon Blvd.93 EB MB Bike Rack
BUS_INDIO09 54/ 80/ 81/ 90/
91/ 95/ 111
Hwy 111 Flower St.835 EB FS Bike Rack
BUS_INDIO03 80/ 54 Monroe St.Hoover St 107 NB FS Bike Rack
BUS_INDIO04 80/ 54/ 81 Monroe St.Fred Waring Dr.321 SB FS Bike Rack
BUS_INDIO05 81/ 111 Hwy 111 Clinton St.333 WB MB Bike Rack
LA QUINTA
BUS_LQ01 70 Adams St.Hwy 111 84 SB FS Bike Locker
BUS_LQ02 70 Avn. Bermudas Calle Tampico 87 NB NS Bike Rack
BUS_LQ03 70 Avn. Bermudas Calle Tampico 88 SB FS Bike Rack
BUS_LQ04 70 Washington St.Calle Tampico 298 NB FS Bike Rack
BUS_LQ08 70 Calle Tampico Washington St.869 WB FS Bike Rack
BUS_LQ09 70 Adams St.Hwy 111 891 NB NS Bike Rack
BUS_LQ05 111 Hwy 111 Washington St.547 EB FS Bike Rack
BUS_LQ06 111 Hwy 111 Adams St.561 WB FS Bike Locker
BUS_LQ07 111 Hwy 111 Adams St.571 EB FS Bike Locker
PALM DESERT
BUS_PD03 32 Gerald Ford Dr.Cook St.205 WB FS Bike Rack
BUS_PD08 32 Dinah shore Dr.Shoppers Ln.938 WB FS Bike Rack
BUS_PD06 70 Harris Ln.Washington St.839 WB FS Bike Rack
Table 6-3. Proposed Transit Stop Bike Amenities by City
ID #Line Street Cross Street Stop #Direction
Position
(NS: Near Side;
FS: Far Side)Amenity Type
BUS_PD05 111 Monterey Ave.San Gorgonio Way 778 NB NS Bike Rack
BUS_PD07 111 Hwy 111 Monterey Ave.873 EB FS Bike Rack
BUS_PD01 111/ 52/ 32 Town Center Way Hahn 65 NB NS Bike Locker
BUS_PD02 111/ 54 Town Center Way Hahn 67 SB FS Bike Locker
BUS_PD04 53/ 111 Hwy 111 Desert Crossing 536 EB FS Bike Rack
PALM SPRINGS
BUS_PS04 14 Gene Autry Tr.E. Vista Chino 490 SB NS Bike Locker
BUS_PS07 14 Gene Autry Tr.Vista Chino 614 NB FS Bike Locker
BUS_PS02 24 Tahquits Cyn Way Civic Dr.29 WB FS Bike Rack
BUS_PS05 24 Avn. Caballeros Vista Chino 496 NB FS Bike Rack
BUS_PS06 24 Vista Chino Avn. Caballeros 609 EB FS Bike Rack
BUS_PS01 111 E. Palm Canyon Dr.Gene Autry Tr.15 EB FS Bike Rack
BUS_PS08 111 Palm Cyn Dr.Gene Autry Tr.667 WB FS Bike Rack
BUS_PS10 14/24/ 30 Baristo Rd.Farell Dr.889 EB NS Bike Locker
BUS_PS03 14/30/ 111 Palm Cyn Dr.Baristo Rd.128 SB FS Bike Locker
BUS_PS09 14/30/ 24 Baristo Rd.Farell Dr.780 WB MB Bike Locker
RANCHO MIRAGE
BUS_RM06 32 Dinah Shore Dr.Shoppers Lane 939 EB FS Bike Rack
BUS_RM01 53 Bob Hope Dr.Hospital 582 NB FS Bike Rack
BUS_RM02 111 Hwy 111 Mirage Cove Dr.643 EB FS Bike Rack
BUS_RM03 111 Hwy 111 Rancho Las Palmas 650 EB NS Bike Rack
BUS_RM04 111 Hwy 111 Rancho Las Palmas 659 WB NS Bike Rack
BUS_RM05 111 Hwy 111 Mirage Cove Dr.663 WB FS Bike Rack
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
BUS_RIV01 32 Ramon Rd.Shelter Dr.427 WB FS Bike Rack
BUS_RIV02 32 Ramon Rd.Varner Rd.429 EB FS Bike Rack
BUS_RIV03 91/95 Lincoln St.Gardenia Ct.867 NB NS Bike Rack
BUS_RIV04 91/95 Lincoln St.63rd Ave.979 NB FS Bike Rack
Page 7-1
INTRODUCTION
A variety of potential funding sources, including local, state,
regional, and federal funding programs, may be used to construct
the proposed bicycle and pedestrian improvements. Most of the
federal and state programs are competitive, and they involve the
completion of extensive applications with clear documentation of
project need, costs, and benefits. Local funding for projects can
come from sources within jurisdictions that compete only with
other projects in each jurisdiction’s budget. A detailed program-by-
program of available funding programs, along with the latest
relevant information, follows.
FEDERAL FUNDING PROGRAMS
MAP-21
The Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act
(MAP--21), passed in June 2012, sets the framework for spending
federal transportation revenue. Bicycle and pedestrian projects are
primarily funded through the Transportation Alternatives Program
(TAP). MAP-21 was intended to be a two-year transportation
spending bill, but it has been extended until Congress reauthorizes
a more permanent source. Accordingly, the following discussion is
subject to change.
Page 7-2
Under MAP-21, bicycling and walking projects are eligible for the
following core programs: National Highway Performance Program
(NHPP), Surface Transportation Program (STP), Highway Safety
Improvement Program (HSIP), and Congestion Mitigation and Air
Quality Improvement (CMAQ), Metropolitan Planning, and
Transportation Alternatives. Transportation Alternatives program
funds are drawn from NHPP, STP, CMAQ, and Metropolitan
Planning and are dedicated funds by and large for bicycling,
walking, and safety for all users. Biking, walking, and trails projects
are also eligible for a handful of other programs such as Scenic
Byways funds, the Transportation, Community, and System
Preservation Program (TCSP), and Tribal High Priority Projects.
The Cardin-Cochran amendment to MAP-21 requires 50 percent
of all program funding to be distributed by population directly to
local metropolitan planning organizations. The rest of the funding
is administered by the states. Thus, MAP-21 funding in California
is administered by the California Department of Transportation
(Caltrans) and the local metropolitan planning organization (MPO).
In the past, the relevant MPO has been the Los Angeles
Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro), but the law may be
interpreted such that the Southern California Association of
Governments (SCAG) will play the role of the local MPO.
Each state has its own method for distributing federal funds.
California folds its Transportation Alternative program funds into
an Active Transportation Program.
More information can be found at:
http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/map21/summaryinfo.cfm
Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)
The HSIP was reauthorized under MAP-21. The program aims to
achieve a significant reduction in traffic fatalities and serious
accidents through the implementation of infrastructure-related
highway safety improvements. These improvements may be on any
public road or publicly owned bicycle and pedestrian pathway or
trail, and can include the use of devices such as traffic signals, curb
extensions, and crosswalks.
MAP-21 allows each state to use HSIP funds for education and
enforcement activities, as long as those activities are consistent with
the state’s Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP). California
completed its SHSP in September 2006 and created an
Implementation Plan in April 2008. MAP-21 also requires states to
focus funds on improvements for pedestrians and the elderly if the
number of crashes among these groups is not below a threshold
level.
Applications are submitted electronically and must demonstrate
that the proposed engineering improvements will increase the
safety of the proposed project area. These are calculated in the
application program using Crash Reduction Factors with
accompanying financial values. Project areas that have a prior
history of injuries or fatalities are more likely to be funded.
More information can be found at:
http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LocalPrograms/hsip.htm
Page 7-3
Transportation, Community, and System
Preservation Program (TCSP)
This program is authorized under MAP-21. It provides federal
funding for projects that improve the efficiency of the
transportation system, reduce the impact on the environment, and
generally investigate the relationships between transportation,
community, and system preservation. Eligible projects include
improving conditions for bicycling and walking, better and safer
operations of existing roads, new signals, and development of new
programs. States, MPOs, and local jurisdictions are eligible to apply
for the discretionary grants. Grantees must annually report on the
status of the project and the degree to which the project is attaining
the stated goals. The report must include quantitative and
qualitative assessments. The Federal Highway Administration
(FHWA) solicits a call for grant applications annually.
More information can be found at:
http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/tcsp/index.html
Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF)
The Land and Water Conversation Fund was authorized under
MAP-21. States receive individual allocations of LWCF grant funds
based on a national formula, with state population being the most
influential factor. States initiate a statewide competition for the
amount available annually. The state then receives, scores, and
ranks applications according to certain project selection criteria so
that only the top-ranked projects (up to the total amount available
that year) are chosen for funding. Chosen applications are then
forwarded to the National Park Service for formal approval and
obligation of federal grant monies. Bike paths and recreational trails
are eligible uses of this money. Cities, counties, recreation and park
districts, and any other entity that has the authority to develop or
maintain a public park is eligible to apply. This program is a
reimbursement program, and the applicant is expected to initially
finance the entire project. A one-for-one match is required, and
federal funds cannot be used as a match, except Community
Development Block Grants. The California State Parks
Department administers these state funds.
More information can be found at: http://www.parks.ca.gov
Community Development Block Grants (CDBG)
The CDBG entitlement program allocates annual grants to larger
cities and urban counties to develop viable communities by
providing decent housing, a suitable living environment, and
opportunities to expand economic opportunities, principally for
low- and moderate-income persons. Every year, the local
governments receive federal money for a wide variety of
community improvements in the form of CDBG funds. Bicycle
and pedestrian facilities are eligible uses of these funds. CDBG
funds only pay for projects in areas of economic need. No match is
required.
More information can be found at: www.hud.gov/cdbg
Rivers, Trails, and Conservation Assistance
(RTCA) Program
This program is the community assistance arm of the National
Park Service. RTCA provides technical assistance to communities
in order to preserve open space and develop trails. The assistance
that RTCA provides is not for infrastructure, but rather building
plans, engaging public participation, and identifying other sources
of funding for conservation and outdoor recreation projects.
More information can be found at:
http://www.nps.gov/orgs/rtca/index.htm
http://www.nps.gov/orgs/rtca/apply.htm
Page 7-4
STATE FUNDING PROGRAMS
Active Transportation Program
The Active Transportation Program results from Senate Bill 99,
Chapter 359, and Assembly Bill 101, Chapter 354, that passed and
were signed by Governor Brown. The program’s purpose is to
increase the use of active modes of transportation by funding
projects that improve options.
The program combines the federal TAP funds with former
statewide bicycle, pedestrian, and Safe Routes to School programs.
Program funds are available for design and construction of any
bicycle or pedestrian project, including infrastructure projects,
plans, and non-infrastructure projects. Capital improvements such
as environmental design, right-of-way, and construction are eligible.
The program will fund the following plans, such as the
development of a community wide bicycle, pedestrian, safe routes
to school, or active transportation plan in a disadvantaged
community. It will also fund non-infrastructure projects, including
education, encouragement, and enforcement projects.
The Active Transportation Program increased funding for bicycle
and pedestrian projects. Caltrans has administered two cycles of
programs as of 2015. The funds are distributed through
competitive grants with the following formula:
40 percent to metropolitan transportation organizations in
urban areas with populations greater than 200,000
10 percent to small urban and rural areas with 200,000 or
fewer people
50 percent available statewide in competitive grants
More information can be found at:
http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LocalPrograms/bta/btawebPage.htm
Office of Traffic Safety (OTS)
The California Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) seeks to reduce
motor vehicle fatalities and injuries through a national highway
safety program. Priority areas include police traffic services, alcohol
and other drugs, occupant protection, pedestrian and bicycle safety,
emergency medical services, traffic records, roadway safety, and
community-based organizations.
The OTS provides grants for one to two years. The California
Vehicle Code (Sections 2908 and 2909) authorizes the
apportionment of federal highway safety funds to the OTS
program. Bicycle safety programs are eligible programs for OTS
start-up funds. City and county agencies are eligible to apply, as are
councils of governments. There is no set maximum for grants, and
no match is required; however, contributions of other funds may
make projects more competitive.
More information can be found at:
http://www.ots.ca.gov/Grants/
Page 7-5
Assembly Bill (AB) 2766 Subvention Program
AB 2766 Clean Air Funds are generated by a surcharge on
automobile registration. The South Coast Air Quality Management
District (SCAQMD) allocates 40 percent of these funds to cities
according to their proportion of the South Coast’s population for
projects that improve air quality. The projects are up to the
discretion of the city and may be used for bicycle or pedestrian
projects that could encourage people to bicycle or walk in lieu of
driving. The other 60 percent is allocated through a competitive
grant program that has specific guidelines for projects which
improve air quality. The guidelines vary and funds are often eligible
for a variety of bicycle and pedestrian projects.
The Mobile Source Review Committee administers the
discretionary funds.
In fiscal year 2012–2013, local jurisdictions received the following
amounts from the SCAQMD.
Cathedral City: $62,671
Coachella: $50,550
Desert Hot Springs:
$33,340
Indian Wells: $6,074
Indio: $94,171
La Quinta: $38,378
Palm Desert: $59,678
Palm Springs: $62,500
Rancho Mirage: $21,115
Unincorporated
Riverside County:
$686,813
More information can be found at:
http://www.aqmd.gov/home/programs/local-government/local-
government-detail?title=ab2766-motor-vehicle-subvention-
program
Transportation Planning Grant Program
The Transportation Planning Grant Program has two grant
programs that can aid in the planning and development of bicycle
and pedestrian facilities. The Environmental Justice: Context
Sensitive Planning Grant is to promote the involvement of low-
income and minority groups in the planning of transportation
projects. The program requires a local match of 10 percent with a
5 percent in-kind contribution maximum. The Community Based
Transportation Planning (CBTP) program funds coordinated
transportation and land use planning projects that encourage
community involvement and partnerships. These projects must
support livable and sustainable community concepts. The Office of
Community Planning, part of Caltrans’s Division of Transportation
Planning, is responsible for managing the program and receives
approximately $3 million annually for each program. Grants are
available up to $300,000 for the Community Based Transportation
Planning grant and up to $250,000 for the Environmental Justice
Context Sensitive Planning Grant. MPOs, regional transportation
planning agencies, cities, counties, and transit agencies are all
eligible to apply for funding.
More information can be found at:
http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/tpp/grants.html
Page 7-6
LOCAL FUNDING
Measure A
In 1998, voters approved Measure A, Riverside County’s half-cent
sales tax for transportation. Funds are allocated to each of three
districts—western Riverside County, the Coachella Valley, and the
Palo Verde Valley—in proportion to what they contribute. In 2002,
Measure A was extended by Riverside County voters to fund
transportation improvements through 2039.
Non-motorized transportation projects are not included in a
specific category of funding under Measure A. Individual projects
can be included by each city under the Local Streets and Roads
program’s allocation of funds. Local Streets and Roads funds are
remitted to local jurisdictions on a monthly basis. In order for
individual projects to receive these funds, cities must provide an
annual Maintenance of Effort certification and five-year capital
improvement plan/program (CIP) that lists projects that will be
funded under Measure A. Projects not included in the five-year
CIP would not be eligible for Measure A funding.
Of the $870 million of 20-year Measure A revenues, approximately
$240 million is allocated for the Coachella Valley and $13 million
for the Palo Verde Valley, which may or may not include those for
on-street bicycle facilities. Oftentimes, bicycle lane (Class II)
projects are included as part of larger roadway projects and would
not be called out specifically as a bicycle project.
The Riverside County Transportation Commission administers
Measure A funds. Thirty-five percent of Measure A funds are
distributed to cities and 15 percent is distributed to SunLine
Transit, with the remaining 50 percent administered by CVAG.
Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF)
As part of Measure A, an innovative Transportation Uniform
Mitigation Fee or TUMF was created. Under the TUMF,
developers of residential, industrial, and commercial property pay a
development fee to fund transportation projects that will be
required as a result of the growth the projects create. CVAG
administers the fee program. The TUMF program does not have a
specific category set aside for non-motorized transportation
projects; however, the TUMF Advisory Subcommittee will
recommend whether non-motorized projects should be considered
in the Total Regional Transportation System Cost used in the
TUMF calculations. Eligible projects must be included in a city’s
general plan circulation element.
The Transportation Project Prioritization Study, the Regional
Arterial Cost Estimate, and the TUMF Nexus Study update
guidelines for TUMF funds.
Resurfacing and Repaving
A jurisdiction is able to add bicycle lanes and sharrows when
resurfacing and repaving streets. While other lanes are restriped,
the bike facilities can be painted as well.
New Construction
Future road widening and construction projects are one means of
providing bike lanes. To ensure that roadway construction projects
provide bike lanes where needed, it is important that an effective
review process is in place to ensure new roads meet the standards
and guidelines presented in this plan. Developers may also be
required to dedicate land toward the widening of roadways in order
to provide for enhanced bicycle mobility.
Page 7-7
Benefit Assessment Districts
Bike paths, lanes, parking, and related facilities can be funded as
part of a local benefit assessment district. However, defining the
boundaries of the benefit district may be difficult since the
bikeways will have city-wide, county-wide, or region-wide benefits.
Adopt-A-Path Program
Maintenance of bicycle paths and recreational trails could be paid
for from private funds in exchange for recognition, such as signs
along the path saying “Maintained by [name].” In order for this
funding source to be sustainable, a special account can be set up
for donors to pay into.
General Funds
Cities and counties may spend general funds as they see fit. Any
bicycle, pedestrian, or trails project can be funded completely
through general funds, or general funds can be used as a local
match for grant funds.
Page 7-8
This page intentionally left blank
Page 8-1
INTRODUCTION
A collection of guidelines and standards for bicycle facility design
has been assembled to bring good practices and consistency to the
Coachella Valley region. This chapter is dedicated to discussing the
application of different facility types.
BICYCLE DESIGN GUIDELINES
The following guidelines present the recommended minimum
design standards and other recommended ancillary support items
for bike paths, bike lanes, bike routes, protected bike lanes, colored
bike lanes, buffered bike lanes, and sharrows. Where possible, it
may be desirable to exceed the minimum standards. These
guidelines cover basic concepts. The Caltrans Highway Design
Manual (HDM) contains more detailed standards and guidance in
Chapter 1000 and should be followed. The American Association
of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Guide
for the Development of Bicycle Facilities (2012) and the National
Association of City Transportation Officials (NACTO) Urban
Bikeway Design Guide (2010) may be referenced where the HDM
is silent.
Page 8-2
This section also references the uniform standards and
specifications for traffic control devices in the California Manual
on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (California MUTCD).
Class I Bike Path Facilities Design
Recommendations
All Class I bike paths should conform to the design
guidelines set forth by Caltrans.
Class I bike paths should generally be designed as
separated facilities away from parallel streets. They are
commonly planned along rights-of-way such as waterways,
utility corridors, railroads, and the like that offer
continuous separated riding opportunities.
Class I Bike Path
Both AASHTO and Caltrans recommend against using
most sidewalks for bike paths because of conflicts with
driveways and intersections. Where sidewalks are used as
bike paths, they should be placed along routes with few
driveways and intersections, be properly separated from
the roadway, not contain obstructions (bus stops, signs,
trees, trash receptacles, etc.), and have carefully designed
intersection crossings.
Bike paths should have a minimum of 8 feet of pavement,
with at least 2 feet of unpaved shoulders for
pedestrians/runners, or a separate pathway for
pedestrians/runners where feasible. A pavement width of
12 feet is preferred.
Sidewalk paths and unpaved facilities that are not funded
with federal transportation dollars and that are not
designated as Class I bike paths do not need to be
designed to Caltrans standards.
Class I bike path roadway crossings should be carefully
engineered to accommodate safe and visible crossing for
users. The design needs to consider the width of the
roadway, whether it has a median, and the roadway’s
average daily and peak-hour traffic volumes. Crossings of
low-volume streets may require simple stop signs.
Crossings of streets with average daily traffic (ADT) of
over 15,000 vehicles per hour should be assessed for
signalized crossing, flashing LED beacons, crossing
islands, or other devices. Roundabouts may be a desirable
treatment for a bike path intersecting with roadways where
the bike path is not next to a parallel street.
Lighting should be provided where bicyclists
will likely use the bike path in the late
evening, such as along commuter routes.
Barriers at path entrances to prevent
motorized vehicles from entering, such as
obstacle posts and gates, can obstruct
bicyclists and should be avoided when
possible. Typically, barriers should not be
considered until after it has been
determined that other measures to prevent
motor vehicles from entering have failed,
No Motor
Vehicles
(R5-3 Sign)
Page 8-3
and where the safety and other issues posed by
unauthorized vehicles are more serious than the safety and
access issues posed to path users. Signs and other design
solutions are preferred.
Bike path construction should take into account vertical
requirements and the impacts of maintenance and
emergency vehicles on shoulders.
Class II Bike Lane Facilities Design
Recommendations
The following guidelines should be used when designing Class II
bikeway facilities. HDM Chapter 1000, AASHTO, the California
MUTCD, and the Caltrans Traffic Manual provide these guidelines.
Class II Bike Lane
Class II bike lane facilities should conform to the
minimum design standard of 5 feet in width in the
direction of vehicle travel adjacent to the curb lane. Where
space is available, a width of 6 to 8 feet is preferred,
especially on busy arterial streets, on grades, and adjacent
to parallel parking.
Under certain circumstances, bike lanes may be 4 feet in
width. Situations where this width is permitted include:
o Bike lanes located between through traffic lanes
and right turn pockets at intersection approaches
(as shown on page 8-12)
o Where there is no parking, the gutter pan is no
more than 12 inches wide, and the pavement is
smooth and flush with the gutter pan
o Where there is no curb and the pavement is
smooth to the edge
Bike Lane (R81) and Bike Route (D11-1) signage shall be
posted after every significant intersection along the route
of the bike lane facility. Begin and End (R81A or R81B)
plaques should accompany the Bike Lane sign when
appropriate. The route number shown on the Bike Route
Identification sign should correspond to the latest city or
county bicycle routes and facilities map. The Bike Route
Identification sign can also be used in conjunction with an
arrow plaque (M6 series) in advance of another
approaching bike lane or route to direct bicyclists. If a bike
lane exists where parking is prohibited, No Parking signage
may accompany bike lane signage.
Bike Lane (R81) and Bike Route (D11-1) Signs
Page 8-4
Bike lanes should be striped with a 6-inch-wide solid white
stripe (California MUTCD Detail 39) and should be
dashed (Detail 39A) at an intersection approach. The
length of Detail 39A shall be 100 feet when the block is
short (less than 400 feet) and 200 feet where the block is
longer or vehicle speeds are high (greater than 35 miles per
hour [mph]). The dashed bike lane stripe allows for use of
the bike lane as a right turn pocket for motor vehicles.
Bike Lane Striping and Stencil
At the beginning of each and end of each block and at
approximately 150- to 250-foot intervals, pavement
stencils of a bicycle and arrow shall be used to show the
direction of travel (see left). The stencils at the end of the
block should be placed just before the dashed bike lane
stripe (Detail 39B).
Bike lanes with two stripes are more visible than those
with one and are preferred. The second inside stripe (4-
inch solid white) would differentiate the bike lane from the
parking lane where appropriate.
Where space permits, intersection treatments should
include bike lane pockets, as shown on page 8-12.
At signalized intersections, loops or other means of bicycle
detection should be installed near the limit line in the bike
lane and all vehicle lanes that have detection. Signal timing
and phasing should be set to accommodate bicycle
acceleration speeds. Painted bicycle detector stencils may
be placed at detection zones located within the bike lane to
notify bicyclists where they can actuate the signal.
Where bike lanes terminate, they typically should transition
to a Class III bike route when possible. Cyclists should be
notified through a sign that includes the Bike Lane sign
(R81) with an End plaque (R81B). Shared lane markings
(sharrows) should be placed in the transition zone to help
guide cyclists to the proper place to ride in the lane.
Class III bike route time, distance and destination signs
should help provide continuity.
When bike lanes are to be implemented on existing
roadway surfaces, it is important to identify and remediate
any longitudinal cracking greater than half an inch wide,
vertical deformations such as utility covers that are not
flush, and other conditions that may affect rideability.
Traffic signals can be timed and coordinated for cyclists
(where appropriate).
Page 8-5
Colored Bike Lanes
Green bicycle lanes increase visibility for cyclists. The Federal
Highway Administration (FHA) and the California Traffic Control
Device Committee have approved green bike lanes on an interim
basis per California MUTCD IA-14; Interim Approval for
Optional Use of Green Colored Pavement for Bike Lanes. The
State of California has requested and received approval from the
FHA to implement California MUTCD IA-14 statewide.
Consequently, the cities or the County may implement green bike
lanes without the need to notify the State or the FHA, provided the
California MUTCD guidelines are followed. Green bicycle lanes are
sometimes used as “conflict zone” treatments. They are short lanes
that are used at right turn pockets or driveways to alert right-
turning motorists of the bike lane. Green bicycle lanes can also be
used as a continuous treatment spanning the extended length of a
bike lane corridor.
Green Bicycle Lane
Buffered Bike Lanes
Buffered bike lanes provide a painted divider between the bike lane
and the adjacent travel lane. This additional space can improve the
comfort of cyclists, as they do not have to ride as close to motor
vehicles. Buffered bike lanes can also be used to narrow travel
lanes, which slows traffic. An additional buffer may be used
between parked cars and bike lanes to direct cyclists to ride outside
of the door zone of the parked cars. Buffered bike lanes are most
important in areas with significant parking turnover. Buffered bike
lanes are most appropriate on wide, busy streets. They can be used
on streets where physically separating the bike lanes with protected
bike lanes is undesirable for cost, operational, or maintenance
reasons.
Buffered Bicycle Lane
Buffered Bicycle Lane Schematic
Page 8-6
Class III Bike Routes
Class III bike routes are typically simple signed routes along street
corridors, usually local streets and collectors. With proper route
signage, design, and maintenance, bike routes can be effective in
guiding bicyclists along a route suited for bicycling that does not
have enough roadway space for a dedicated Class II bike lane.
Class III bike routes can be designed in a manner that encourages
bicycle usage, convenience, and safety.
Class III Bike Route
Bike routes can become more useful when coupled with the
following techniques:
Route, directional, and distance signage.
Wide curb lanes.
Shared lane marking stencils painted in the traffic lane
along the appropriate path of where a bicyclist would ride
in the lane.
Accelerated pavement maintenance schedules.
Traffic signals timed and coordinated for cyclists (where
appropriate).
At signalized intersections, loop detectors or other means
of bicycle detection should be installed near the limit lane
in all vehicle lanes that have vehicle detection.
Traffic signals can be timed and coordinated for cyclists
(where appropriate). Signal timing and phasing should be
set to accommodate bicycle acceleration speeds.
Traffic calming measures.
Remediation of longitudinal cracking greater than half an
inch wide, utility covers that are not flush, vertical
deformations, and other conditions that may affect
rideability.
Bike Route (D11-1) signage, as shown on page 8-3, should
be posted after every intersection along the route to
inform bicyclists that the bikeway facility continues and
alert motorists to the presence of bicyclists. Begin and End
plaques (M4-14 and M4-6) should accompany the Bike
Route sign when appropriate. The route number shown on
the Bike Route Identification sign should correspond to
the latest city or county bicycle routes and facilities map.
The Bike Route sign can also be used in conjunction with
an arrow plaque (M6 series) in advance of another
approaching bike route or lane to direct bicyclists. If a bike
route exists where parking is prohibited, No Parking
signage may accompany bike lane signage.
Sharrows
Sharrow stencils are recommended as a way to enhance the
visibility and safety of Class III bike routes. Sharrows (officially
known as shared lane markings) indicate to cyclists the proper
position in which to ride within the travel lane and assist with
wayfinding. Sharrows also alert motorists that the travel lane is to
Page 8-7
be shared with bicyclists. California MUTCD, Section 9C.103(CA)
Shared Roadway Bicycle Markings states, “The shared roadway
bicycle marking shall only be used on a roadway (Class III Bikeway
(Bike Route) or Shared Roadway (No Bikeway Designation).”
When used on streets with on-street parking, sharrows are to be
placed such that the centers of the markings are a minimum of
11 feet from the curb face or edge of paved shoulder on streets
with on-street parallel parking. On streets without on-street parking
which have an outside travel lane that is less than 14 feet wide, the
centers of the sharrows should be at least 4 feet from the face of
the curb.
Door Zone and Sharrow Placement
On two-lane roadways, these minimum distances allow vehicles to
pass bicyclists on the left within the same lane without encroaching
into the opposite lane of traffic. (On multilane roadways, motorists
must change lanes to pass a cyclist.) On streets with on-street
parking, installing sharrows more than 11 feet from the curb will
also move the bicyclist farther from the door zone (see above)
(approximately 4 feet).
Sharrows should be placed in straight lines to encourage the
bicyclist to travel in a straight line. This often means the sharrows
are in the center of the lane, greater than the minimum guideline of
4 or 11 feet from the curb. Sharrows should always be placed
outside the door zone where on-street parking is provided.
Ideally, sharrows should be placed immediately after an intersection
and spaced no more than 150 feet apart on Class III bike routes.
On streets with shared lane markings, they may be spaced up to
250 feet apart. Sharrows should also be placed at the end of each
block approximately 50 feet in advance of the limit line. Placing the
sharrows between tire tracks increases the life of the markings and
decreases long-term maintenance costs.
Sharrow Stencil
Page 8-8
Greenback Sharrows
Some cities highlight sharrows with a square of green paint to make
them more visible. These are called greenback sharrows. The
Federal Highway Administration currently permits experimentation
of greenback sharrows. Cities and the County should use the same
design guidelines as for regular shared lane markings. Sharrows are
likely to be more effective where spaced close together.
Sharrow Marking Greenback Sharrow
Colored Pavement Treatments
Pavement coloring is useful for a variety of applications in
conjunction with bicycle facilities. The primary goal of colored
pavements is to differentiate specific portions of the traveled way,
but colored pavements can also visibly reduce the perceived width
of the street.
Colored pavements are used to highlight conflict areas between
bicycle lanes and turn lanes, especially where bicycle lanes merge
across motor vehicle turn lanes. Colored pavements can be used in
conjunction with shared lane markings (greenback sharrows) in
heavily used commercial corridors where no other provisions for
bicycle facilities are evident.
Colored Bicycle Lanes Schematic
Green Colored Bicycle Lane: Santa Monica, California
While a variety of colored treatments have been used, the Federal
Highway Administration has approved bright green for interim use.
Maintenance of color and surface condition are considerations.
Traditional traffic paints and coatings can become slippery. Long-
life surfaces with good wet skid resistance should be considered.
Greenback Sharrow:
UCLA Campus
Page 8-9
Wayfinding
The ability to navigate through a region is informed by landmarks,
natural features, signs, and other visual cues. Wayfinding is a cost-
effective and highly visible way to improve the bicycling
environment by familiarizing users with the bicycle network,
helping users identify the best routes to destinations, addressing
misperceptions about time and distance, and helping overcome a
barrier to entry for infrequent cyclists (e.g., “interested but
concerned” cyclists).
A bikeway wayfinding system is typically composed of signs
indicating direction of travel, location of destinations, and travel
time/distance to those destinations; pavement markings indicating
to bicyclists that they are on a designated route or bike boulevard
and reminding motorists to drive courteously; and maps providing
users with information regarding destinations, bicycle facilities, and
route options.
Wayfinding Signs: Seattle, Washington
Legal Status
As of the writing of this Plan, a number of the designs discussed
above, including protected intersections, colored bike lanes, bike
boxes, and colored treatments of shared lane markings, have not
yet been fully adopted by the federal MUTCD or AASHTO and
are considered experimental treatments. These devices appear to be
promising improvements in bicycle access and safety, as they have
been widely used in Europe and experimented with in the United
States. Any jurisdiction wishing to use these treatments should
follow the appropriate experimental procedures.
Page 8-10
BIKEWAY INTERSECTIONS
Intersections are junctions at which different modes of
transportation meet and facilities overlap. A well-designed
intersection facilitates the interchange between bicyclists,
pedestrians, motorists, and transit so traffic flows in a safe and
efficient manner. Designs for intersections with bicycle facilities
should reduce conflicts between bicyclists (and other vulnerable
road users) and vehicles by heightening visibility, denoting a clear
right-of-way, and ensuring that the various users are aware of each
other. Intersection treatments can resolve both queuing and
merging maneuvers for bicyclists and are often coordinated with
timed or specialized signals.
Chapter 6 provides general principles of geometric design; all these
recommendations will benefit cyclists. The configuration of a safe
intersection for bicyclists may include additional elements such as
color, signs, medians, signal detection, and pavement markings.
Intersection design should take into consideration existing and
anticipated bicyclist, pedestrian, and motorist movements. In all
cases, the degree of mixing or separation between bicyclists and
other modes is intended to reduce the risk of crashes and increase
bicyclist comfort. The level of treatment required for bicyclists at
an intersection will depend on the bicycle facility type used,
whether bicycle facilities are intersecting, the adjacent street
function, and the adjacent land use.
Bikeway Markings at Intersections
Page 8-11
Bikeway Markings at Intersections
Continuing marked bicycle facilities at intersections (up to the
crosswalk) ensures that separation, guidance on proper positioning,
and awareness by motorists are maintained through these potential
conflict areas. The appropriate treatment for right-turn-only lanes
is to place a bike lane pocket between the right turn lane and the
rightmost through lane. If a full bike lane pocket cannot be
accommodated, a shared bicycle/right turn lane can be installed
that places a standard-width bike lane on the left side of a
dedicated right turn lane. A dashed strip delineates the space for
bicyclists and motorists within the shared lane. This treatment
includes signs advising motorists and bicyclists of proper
positioning within the lane. Sharrows are another option for
marking a bikeway through an intersection where a bike lane
pocket cannot be accommodated.
Bike Lane Markings at Intersections with Right Turn Lanes
Bike Signal Heads
Bicycle signal heads may be installed at signalized intersections to
improve identified safety or operational problems for bicyclists;
they provide guidance for bicyclists at intersections where bicyclists
may have different needs from other road users (e.g., bicycle-only
movements and leading bicycle intervals) or to indicate separate
bicycle signal phases and other bicycle-specific timing strategies. A
bicycle signal should only be used in combination with an existing
conventional or hybrid beacon. In the United States, bicycle signal
heads typically use standard three-lens signal heads in green, yellow,
and red with a stencil of a bicycle.
Bike Signal Head: Long Beach, California
Bicycle Signal Detection
Bicycle detection is used at actuated traffic signals to alert the signal
controller of bicycle crossing demand on a particular approach.
Bicycle detection occurs either through the use of push buttons or
by automated means (e.g., in-pavement loops, video, and
microwave). Inductive loop vehicle detection at many signalized
intersections is calibrated to the size or metallic mass of a vehicle,
meaning that bicycles may often go undetected. The result is that
Page 8-12
bicyclists must either wait for a vehicle to arrive, dismount, and
push the pedestrian button (if available) or cross illegally. Loop
sensitivity can be increased to detect bicycles.
Proper bicycle detection must accurately detect bicyclists (be
sensitive to the mass and volume of a bicycle and its rider) and
provide clear guidance to bicyclists on how to actuate detection
(e.g., what button to push or where to stand).
Bike Boxes
A bike box is a designated area at the head of a traffic lane at a
signalized intersection that provides bicyclists with a safe and
visible way to get ahead of queuing traffic during the red signal
phase. Appropriate locations include:
At signalized intersections with high volumes of bicycles
and/or motor vehicles, especially those with frequent
bicyclist left turns and/or motorist right turns
Where there may be right- or left-turning conflicts
between bicyclists and motorists
Where there is a desire to better accommodate left-turning
bicycle traffic
Where a left turn is required to follow a designated bike
route or boulevard or access a shared-use path, or when
the bicycle lane moves to the left side of the street
When the dominant motor vehicle traffic flows right and
bicycle traffic continues through (such as at a Y
intersection or access ramp)
Bicycle Box: Portland, Oregon
Bicycle Countdowns
Near-side bicycle signals may incorporate a “countdown to green”
display to provide information regarding how much time remains
until the green bicycle indication is shown, enabling riders to push
off as soon as the light turns green.
Leading Bicycle Intervals
Based on the Leading Pedestrian Interval, a Leading Bicycle
Interval (LBI) can be implemented in conjunction with a bicycle
signal head. Under an LBI, bicyclists are given a green signal while
vehicular traffic is held at all red for several seconds, providing a
head start for bicyclists to advance through the intersection. This
treatment is particularly effective in locations where bicyclists are
required to make a challenging merge or lane change (e.g., to access
a left turn pocket) shortly after the intersection, as the LBI would
give them sufficient time to make the merge before being
overtaken by vehicular traffic. This treatment can be used to
enhance a bicycle box.
Page 8-13
Two-Stage Turn Queue Boxes
On right side protected bike lanes, bicyclists are often unable to
merge into traffic to turn left due to physical separation. This
makes the provision of two-stage left turns critical in ensuring
these facilities are functional. The same principles for two-stage
turns apply to both bike lanes and protected bike lanes. While two-
stage turns may increase bicyclist comfort in many locations, this
configuration will typically result in higher average signal delay for
bicyclists because of the need to receive two separate green signal
indications (one for the through street, followed by one for the
cross street) before proceeding.
Two-Stage Turn Queue Box Schematic
Protected Intersections
At some intersections, Holland is using protective treatments for
bicycles similar to protected bike lanes. These intersections have
islands and crosswalks that allow people on bicycles to advance
further in the intersection than motor vehicles and to stay to the
right of motor vehicles. The islands protect bicyclists at the
intersections. These treatments are designed in conjunction with
and next to pedestrian crossings.
Protected Intersections Schematic
Page 8-14
Bicycle Parking
Bicycle parking is not standardized in any state or municipal code.
However, there are preferable types of secure bicycle
accommodations available. Bicycle parking is a critical component
of the network and facilitates bicycle travel, especially for
commuting and utilitarian purposes. The provision of bicycle
parking at every destination ensures that bicyclists have a place to
safely secure their mode of travel. Elements of proper bicycle
parking accommodation are outlined below.
Bike racks provide short-term parking. Bicycle racks
should offer adequate support for the bicycles and should
be easy to lock to. The figures below display a common
inverted-U design that accomplishes these
recommendations.
Inverted-U Bike Racks
A multi-bicycle rack that works well
An innovative concept
where the bike rack itself looks like a bicycle
Page 8-15
Long-term parking should be provided for those needing
all-day storage or enhanced safety. Bicycle lockers offer
good long-term storage, as shown below. Attendant and
automated parking also serves long-term uses.
Bicycle Lockers
Bicycle parking should be clearly identified by signage,
such as shown in the figure below. Signage also identifies
the location of racks and lockers at the entrance to
shopping centers, buildings, and other establishments
where parking may not be provided in an obvious location,
such as near a front door.
Bicycle Parking Sign (Caltrans)
Bicycle parking should be located close to the front door
of buildings and retail establishments in order to provide
for the convenience, visibility, and safety of those who
park their bicycles.
Bicycle lockers should have informational signage,
placards, or stickers placed on or immediately adjacent to
them identifying the procedure for how to use a locker.
This information at a minimum should include the
following:
o Contact information to obtain a locker at City Hall
or other administrating establishment
o Cost (if any) for locker use
o Terms of use
o Emergency contact information
Bicycle lockers should be labeled explicitly as such and not
be used for other types of storage.
Bicycle racks and storage lockers should be bolted tightly
to the ground in a manner that prevents tampering.
Page 8-16
PEDESTRIAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
Walking requires two important features in the built environment:
people must walk along streets and they must get across streets.
Crossing a street should be easy, safe, convenient, and comfortable.
While pedestrian behavior and crossing design affect the street
crossing experience, motorist behavior (whether and how motorists
yield to pedestrians) is the most significant factor in pedestrian
safety.
A number of tools exist to improve pedestrian safety and to make
crossing streets easier and walking along streets more comfortable
and inviting. Effective traffic management can address concerns
about traffic speed and volume. A motorist driving more slowly
has more time to see, react, and stop for a pedestrian. The number
of pedestrians also influences motorists; in general, motorists are
more aware of pedestrians when more people walk.
Providing marked crosswalks is only one of the many possible
engineering measures. According to Charles Zegeer of the
Pedestrian and Bicycle Information Center (PBIC), when
considering how to provide safer crossings for pedestrians, the
question should not be: “Should I provide a marked crosswalk?”
Instead, the question should be: “What are the most effective
measures that can be used to help pedestrians safely cross the
street?” Deciding whether to mark or not mark crosswalks is only
one consideration in creating safe and convenient pedestrian
crossings.
In addition, providing adequate sidewalk width and amenities can
increase pedestrian comfort and safety. Land uses play an
important part in sidewalk design and dictate appropriate widths
for each zone in the pedestrian way.
This section describes the majority of measures available to
improve pedestrian crossings and sidewalks, including marked
crosswalks, raised crossing islands and medians, lighting, sidewalk
design, and streetscape enhancements. The measures are listed for
crossings first, then for sidewalks.
The estimated costs in this section are for planning purposes. They
will vary greatly depending on the existing conditions, design
specifics of the treatment, and local materials and labor costs.
Page 8-17
Intersection Type Guidance
Every location requires tailored design and engineering judgment.
That judgment should follow the guidelines described in each of
the following device sheets, as well as other guidance from the
California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices and other
documents. It is possible, however, to identify the treatments that
are commonly used at different types of intersections. They are as
listed below.
Uncontrolled Crossings (No Signal or Stop Sign)
High-visibility crosswalks
Advance yield lines
Signs
Crossing islands (the most important device at multilane
crossings)
Rectangular rapid-flash beacons
Hybrid beacons
As the number of travel lanes, traffic volume, street width, and
speed increases, more devices are needed. Pedestrians need signals
to cross four-lane crossings with ADTs between 20,000 and 30,000
(or greater); the exact threshold depends on the number of lanes,
speeds, and roadway width.
Stop-Control Crossings
Marked crosswalks (high-visibility crosswalks depending
on traffic volumes, number of lanes, street width, number
of pedestrians, presence of schools nearby)
Advance stop bars
Perpendicular curb ramps with tactile warning devices
Curb extensions where on-street parking exists (depending
on traffic volumes, number of lanes, street width, number
of pedestrians, presence of schools nearby)
Crossing islands (depending on number of travel lanes,
street width, traffic volumes)
Signalized Crossings
Countdown pedestrian signal heads
Advance stop bars
High-visibility crosswalks
Accessible pedestrian signals
Bulb-outs where on-street parking exists
Crossing islands (depending on available space, traffic
volumes, number of lanes, street width, number of
pedestrians, presence of schools nearby)
Page 8-18
Audio Pedestrian Signal
Crossings
Description
A device that communicates information to pedestrians in
nonvisual format such as audible tones, verbal messages, and/or
vibrating surfaces. These signals provide accessibility to those who
have visual impairments. Verbal messages are generally preferred
over tones.
Key Design Features
Provides pedestrian signal information to those who
cannot see the pedestrian signal head across the street
Provides information to pedestrians about the presence
and location of push buttons, if pressing a button is
required to actuate pedestrian timing
Provides unambiguous information about the WALK
indication and which crossing is being signaled
Uses audible beaconing only where necessary
Should install two poles for APS speakers, located close to
the departure location and crosswalk
Ensures accessibility to for push button placement
Benefits
Creates a more accessible pedestrian network
Assists those who are visually impaired
Can contain additional wayfinding information in messages
More accurate judgments of the onset of the WALK
interval
Reduction in crossings begun during DON’T WALK
Reduced delay
Significantly more crossings completed before the signal
changes
Applications
ADA requires newly constructed or altered public facilities
to be accessible, regardless of the funding source
Installed by request along a specific route of travel for a
particular individual or group of individuals who are blind
or visually impaired
Page 8-19
Advance Stop Bar
Crossings
Car stops at advance stop line, prior to crosswalk
Description
A placing of the stop limit line for vehicle traffic at a traffic signal
behind the crosswalk for the added safety of crossing pedestrians.
Key Design Features
Vehicle stop line moved 4 to 6 feet farther back from the
pedestrian crossing
Benefits
Keeps cars from encroaching on crosswalk
Low cost, effective device
Improves visibility of through cyclists and crossing
pedestrians for motorists
Allows pedestrians and motorists more time to assess each
other’s intentions when the signal phase changes
Applications
Can be used at any signalized or stop-controlled
intersection
Presence of advanced stop bar is more important on
roadways with higher speeds (30 mph and greater)
Should be included at all crossings of road with four or
more lanes without a raised median or crossing island that
has an ADT of 12,000
Page 8-20
Advance Yield Line
Crossings
Advance yield line (shark’s teeth)
denotes yield point to motorists
Description
A placing of the yield line (shark’s teeth) for vehicle traffic in
advance of a crosswalk at uncontrolled locations.
Key Design Features
Advanced yield line should be placed 20 to 50 feet in
advance of crosswalks along with “Yield here to
pedestrians” sign placed adjacent to the markings
Benefits
Inexpensive treatment
Improves sight visibility of pedestrians and motorists when
used correctly
Helps reduce potential of multiple-threat crashes
Yielding vehicle does not screen the view of motorists in
the pedestrian’s next lane of travel
Reduces likelihood that vehicle traveling behind yielding
vehicle will cross centerline and strike pedestrian
Applications
Crosswalks on streets with uncontrolled approaches
Right turn slip lane crossings
Midblock marked crosswalks
Presence of advance yield line most important on
multilane streets
Page 8-21
Countdown Signal
Crossings
Pedestrian countdown signal shows there are
12 seconds left to cross before signal will turn
Description
A walk signal that provides a countdown to the next solid “don’t
walk” signal phase in order to provide pedestrians with information
on how much time they have to cross.
Key Design Features
Ensures that signals are visible to pedestrians
When possible, provides a walk interval for every cycle
Pedestrian push buttons must be well positioned and
within easy reach for all approaching pedestrians
Benefits
Indicates appropriate time for pedestrians to cross
Provides pedestrian clearance interval
Applications
Should be placed for each crossing leg at signalized
intersections
Page 8-22
Crosswalk Markings
Crossings
Continental-style marked crosswalk at midblock crossing
is visible from farther away
Description
High-visibility crosswalks—continental, zebra-stripe, piano key, or
ladder style—should be provided at any intersection where a
significant number of pedestrians cross. They are most important
at uncontrolled crossings of multilane streets.
Key Design Features
Locations should be convenient for pedestrian access
Used in conjunction with other measures such as advance
warning signs, markings, crossing islands, and curb
extensions
Place to avoid wear due to tires
Benefits
Indicates preferred pedestrian crossings
Warns motorists to expect pedestrians crossing
Higher visibility than typical lateral-line marked crosswalks
Can be placed to minimize wear and tear (between tire
tracks)
Applications
Enhances all marked crossings
Necessary at marked midblock and uncontrolled crossing
locations
Page 8-23
Curb Extension
Crossings
Curb Extension in Asheville, North Carolina
Description
A segment of sidewalk, landscaping, or curb that is extended into
the street at the corner, and usually associated with crosswalks. A
curb extension typically extends out to align with the edge of the
parking lane. They can be placed at locations where there is no on-
street parking by tapering the extensions to the approach.
Key Design Features
Curb extensions sited at corners or midblock
Extends out to approximately align with parking (typically
1 to 2 feet less than parking lane width)
Reduced effective curb radius
Can be tapered at approach in cases where there is no on-
street parking
Should not block travel or bicycle lanes
Paired with bicycle lanes, curb extensions can increase the
effective curb radius for larger vehicles
Bulb-outs are a type of curb extension that has a distinct
bulb shape that extends into the on-street parking lane
Benefits
Shortens pedestrian crossing
Reduces curb radius, slowing turning vehicles
Provides traffic calming
Improves sight visibility for pedestrians and motorists
Provides space for landscaping, beautification, water
treatment, furnishings, signs, etc.
Often can provide space for perpendicular curb ramps
Applications
Areas with high pedestrian traffic (downtown, mixed-use
areas) where traffic calming is desired
Jurisdiction must evaluate placement on case-by-case basis,
taking into account drainage, signal pole modification, lane
widths, driveways, and bus stops
Page 8-24
Curb Ramp
Crossings
Perpendicular ramps with truncated domes assist sight-
impaired and wheelchair users
Description
A ramp and landing that allows a smooth transition between
sidewalk and street via a moderate slope. The Americans with
Disabilities Act requires wheelchair access at every street corner.
On streets with low traffic volumes and short crossing distances,
diagonal ramps may be acceptable.
Key Design Features
Where feasible, ramps for each crosswalk at an intersection
are preferable
Tactile warnings will alert pedestrians to the
sidewalk/street edge
Curb ramps must have a slope of no more than 1:12 (must
not exceed 25.4 mm/0.3 m (1 in/ft) or a maximum grade
of 8.33 percent), and a maximum slope on any side flares
of 1:10
Benefits
Double curb ramps make the trip across the street shorter
and more direct than diagonal ramps
Provides compliance with ADA when designed correctly
Improves pedestrian accessibility for those in wheelchairs,
with strollers, and for children
Applications
Curb ramps must be installed at all intersections and
midblock locations where pedestrian crossings exist, as
mandated by federal legislation (1973 Rehabilitation Act
and 1990 Americans with Disabilities Act)
Priority locations for curb ramps are in downtown, near
transit stops, schools, parks, and medical facilities, and
near residences with people who use wheelchairs
Page 8-25
Intersection Geometry Modification
Crossings
Description
Geometry sets the basis for how all users traverse intersections and
interact with each other. Intersection skew can create an unfriendly
environment for pedestrians. Skewed intersections are those where
two streets intersect at angles other than right angles. Intersection
geometry should be as close to 90 degrees as possible.
Key Design Features
Consider removing one or more legs from the major
intersection and creating a minor intersection farther
upstream or downstream (if there are more than two
streets intersecting)
Close one or more of the approach lanes to motor vehicle
traffic, while still allowing access for pedestrians and
bicyclists
Introduce pedestrian islands if the crossing distance
exceeds three lanes (approximately 44 feet)
General use, travel lanes, and bike lanes may be striped
with dashes to guide bicyclists and motorists through a
long undefined area
Benefits
Skewed intersections are undesirable
Slows turning vehicles by making angles more acute
Shortens pedestrian crossing distances
Improves sight visibility
Applications
Every reasonable effort should be made to design or
redesign the intersection closer to a right angle
Page 8-26
Lighting
Crossings
Well-lit crosswalk in Denmark
Description
Lighting is important to include at all pedestrian crossing locations
for the comfort and safety of road users. Lighting should be
present at all marked crossing locations. Lighting provides cues to
drivers to expect pedestrians earlier.
Key Design Features
FHWA HT-08-053, The Information Report on Lighting
Design for Mid-block Crosswalks, found that a vertical
illumination of 20 lux in front of the crosswalk, measured
at a height of 5 feet from the road surface, provided
adequate detection distances in most circumstances
Illumination just in front of crosswalks creates optimal
visibility of pedestrians
Crosswalk lighting should provide color contrast from
standard roadway lighting
Benefits
Enhances safety of all roadway users, particularly
pedestrians
Enhances commercial districts
Improves nighttime safety
Applications
Ensure pedestrian walkways and crosswalks are well lit
Use uniform lighting levels
When installing roadway lighting, install on both sides of
wide streets
Consider pedestrian versus vehicular scale for lighting
(each has a different application)
Page 8-27
Median
Crossings
A gap and channelization in this raised median places
pedestrians in correct orientation to cross
Description
Raised medians are the most important, safest, and most adaptable
engineering tool for improving many street crossings. A median is a
continuous raised area separating opposite flows of traffic.
Key Design Features
Raised median with center area for landscaping
Provide frequent breaks in median to assist crossing
pedestrians
Minimum of 6 feet wide, but usually as wide as center turn
lane
Benefits
Separates traffic flows
Slows traffic
Breaks crossings into shorter segments
Provides space for landscaping and beautification
Makes street feel narrower
Allows pedestrians to cross during a gap in one direction
of traffic at a time
Applications
Raised medians and crossing islands are commonly used
between intersections when blocks are long (500 feet or
more in downtowns) and in the following situations:
o Speeds are higher than desired
o Streets are wide
o Traffic volumes are high
o Sight distances are poor
Raised islands have nearly universal applications and
should be placed where there is a need for people to cross
the street
To slow traffic
Page 8-28
Midblock Crossing
Crossings
Midblock crossing in Vancouver, British Columbia
Description
A crosswalk designed at a midpoint between intersections. These
are best suited where there is a long distance (greater than 400 feet)
between crosswalks on retail streets, in front of schools, etc.
Intersections without traffic signals or STOP signs are considered
uncontrolled intersections.
Key Design Features
High-visibility crosswalk marking
Crossing islands, median gap, or short crossing
Advance crossing and crossing signs
Advance yield markings and signs
Signs
Rapid-flash beacons where traffic volumes and street
width merit
Pedestrian-activated signals should be used for streets with
high speeds and volumes
Benefits
Brings both sides of the street closer for pedestrians
Enhances visibility of pedestrians
Informs drivers to expect pedestrians, and directs
pedestrians to cross at specified locations
Deters pedestrians from dashing across street at random
Applications
Decision to mark a crosswalk at an uncontrolled location
should be guided by an engineering study
Consider vehicular volumes and speeds, roadway width
and number of lanes, stopping sight distance and triangles,
distance to the next controlled crossing, nighttime
visibility, grade, origin-destination of trips, left turning
conflicts, and pedestrian volumes
On multilane roadways, marked crosswalks alone are not
recommended under the following conditions: ADT >
12,000 without median; ADT > 15,000 with median; or
speeds > 40 mph. Add devices such as advance stop bar,
crossing islands, etc.
Page 8-29
Neighborhood Traffic Circle
Crossings
Neighborhood traffic circle in Vancouver, British Columbia
Description
Neighborhood traffic circles, sometimes called “mini-circles” are
small circles that are retrofitted into local street intersections to
control vehicle speeds in a neighborhood. Typically, a tree and/or
landscaping are located within the central island to provide
increased visibility of the roundabout and enhance the intersection.
Key Design Features
The design of neighborhood traffic circles is primarily
confined to selecting a central island size to achieve the
appropriate design speed of around 15 to 20 mph
Neighborhood traffic circles should generally have similar
features as roundabouts, including yield-on-entry and
painted or mountable splitter islands
Can replace stop-controlled intersections in residential
areas
Benefits
Creates continuous, slow vehicle speeds
Better for bicyclists than stop controls
Improves traffic flow
Allows space for landscaping and beautification, as well as
stormwater recapture
Reduces crashes
Applications
Neighborhood traffic circles should be used on low-
volume neighborhood streets
Larger vehicles can turn left in front of the central island if
necessary
Curb radius should be tight; may impede some large
vehicles from turning
Landscaped circles often require agreements from adjacent
residents and maintenance
Page 8-30
Pedestrian Crossing Island
Crossings
Pedestrian crossing islands in a downtown
Description
A defined area in the center of the street that is raised and provides
a refuge area for pedestrians crossing a busy street. Can be used at
any street crossing, but most important at uncontrolled crossings
of multilane streets.
Key Design Features
Raised, curbed islands that flank marked crosswalk
Do not block through path
Separate directions of vehicle travel
Benefits
Allows pedestrian to cross one direction of traffic at a time
Slows vehicles
Provides refuge if crossing time is insufficient
Applications
Any bidirectional street with adequate width
Especially important on uncontrolled multilane streets
Page 8-31
Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon
Crossings
Pedestrian hybrid beacon on four-lane street
with high speeds and volumes
Description
A pedestrian hybrid beacon is used to warn and control traffic at an
unsignalized location to help pedestrians cross a street or highway
at a marked crosswalk.
Key Design Features
Minimum of 20 pedestrians per hour is needed to warrant
installation
Should be placed in conjunction with signs, crosswalks,
and advance yield lines to warn and control traffic at
locations where pedestrians enter or cross a street or
highway
Should only be installed at a marked crosswalk
Benefits
Can be used at a location that does not meet traffic signal
warrants or at a location that meets traffic signal warrants
but a decision has been made to not install a traffic control
signal
Additional safety measure and warning device at
uncontrolled location
Remains dark until activated
Applications
Installations should be done according to e MUTCD
Chapter 4F, “Pedestrian Hybrid Beacons.” The California
MUTCD has not yet approved the beacons for use. Local
jurisdictions should follow the formal experimental
process to use these.
Page 8-32
Raised Crosswalk
Crossings
Raised crosswalk on a campus
Description
A crosswalk that has been raised in order to slow motor vehicles
and to enhance the visibility of crossing pedestrians.
Key Design Features
Trapezoidal in shape on both sides, with a flat top where
the pedestrians cross
Level crosswalk area must be paved with smooth materials
Texture or special pavements used for aesthetics should be
placed on the beveled slopes, where they will be seen by
approaching motorists
Often require culverts or another means of drainage
treatment
Benefits
Increases visibility of pedestrian, especially to motorists in
large vehicles
Traffic calming
Continuous level for pedestrians
Applications
Areas with significant pedestrian traffic and where motor
vehicle traffic should move slowly, such as near schools,
on college campuses, in main street retail environments,
and in other similar places
Effective near elementary schools where they raise small
children by a few inches and make them more visible
Page 8-33
Rectangular Rapid-Flash Beacon
Crossings
Rectangular rapid-flash beacons
at uncontrolled crossing location
Description
The beacon uses rectangular-shaped high-intensity LED-based
indications, flashes rapidly in a wig-wag “flickering” flash pattern,
and is mounted immediately between the crossing sign and the
sign’s supplemental arrow plaque.
Key Design Features
Placed at crosswalk and in center median/crossing island
Crosswalk sign with arrow
Wig-wag flickering flash pattern mounted between
crossing sign and arrow pointing to crosswalk
Benefits
Increases motorist compliance to yield to pedestrians
crossing at uncontrolled marked locations
Provides additional visibility to crosswalks
Visible at night and during the day
Applications
Approved for interim use by the California Traffic Control
Device Committee (CTCDC)
Jurisdiction should go through appropriate CTCDC steps
to use
Use of rectangular rapid-flash beacons should be limited to
locations with the most critical safety concerns, such as
pedestrian and school crosswalks at uncontrolled locations
Page 8-34
Reduced Curb Radius
Crossings
Description
The geometry of the corner radius impacts the feel and look of a
street. Tight corner radii create shorter crossing distances and
provide a traffic calming effect.
Key Design Features
Default design vehicle should be the passenger vehicle;
initial corner radius is between 15 and 25 feet
Larger design vehicles should be used only where they are
known to regularly make turns at the intersection (such as
in the case of a truck or bus route)
Design based on the larger design vehicle traveling at near
5 mph or crawl speed
Consider the effect that bicycle lanes and on-street parking
have on the effective radius, increasing the ease with which
large vehicles can turn
Benefits
Slower vehicular turning speeds
Reduces pedestrian crossing distance and crossing time
Better geometry for installing perpendicular ramps for
both crosswalks at each corner
Simpler and more appropriate crosswalk placement that
aligns directly with sidewalks on the other side of the
intersection
Applications
All corners
Page 8-35
Right-Turn Channelization Island
Crossings
Right turn lane in Orlando, Florida
Description
A raised channelization island between the through lanes and the
right turn lane is a good alternative to an overly large corner radius
and enhances pedestrian safety and access. It allows pedestrians to
cross fewer lanes at a time.
Key Design Features
Provides a yield sign for the slip lane
Provides at least a 60-degree angle between vehicle flows
Places the crosswalk across the right turn lane about one
car length back from where drivers yield to traffic on the
other street
Typical layout involves creating an island that is roughly
twice as long as it is wide; the corner radius will typically
have a long radius (150 to 300 feet) followed by a short
radius (20 to 50 feet)
Necessary to allow large trucks to turn into multiple
receiving lanes
Benefits
Allows motorists and pedestrians to judge the right
turn/pedestrian conflict separately
Reduces pedestrian crossing distance, which can improve
signal timing for all users
Balances vehicle capacity and truck turning needs with
pedestrian safety
Provides an opportunity for landscape and hardscape
enhancement
Slows motorists
Applications
Right turn lanes should generally be avoided, as they
increase the size of the intersection, the pedestrian
crossing distance, and the likelihood of right turns on red
by inattentive motorists who do not notice pedestrians on
their right
Heavy volumes of right turns (approximately 200 vehicles
per hour or more)
Page 8-36
Roundabout
Crossings
Single-lane roundabout in La Jolla, California
Description
A roundabout is an intersection design that can replace traffic
signals. Users approach the intersection, slow down, stop and/or
yield to pedestrians in a crosswalk, and then enter a circulating
roadway, yielding to drivers already in the roundabout. The
circulating roadway encircles a central island around which vehicles
travel counterclockwise.
Key Design Features
Deflection encourages slow traffic speeds
Landscaped visual obstruction in the central island
discourages users from entering the roundabout at high
speeds
Central island should not contain attractions
Each leg of a roundabout has a triangular splitter island
that prevents drivers from turning left (the “wrong way”)
Truck apron
Benefits
Reduces conflicts, all forms of crashes, and crash severity
(particularly left-turn and right-angle crashes)
Little to no delay for pedestrians
Improves accessibility for bicyclists
Approximately 30 percent more vehicle capacity than
signals (allowing possible reduction in number of lanes and
roadway width)
Reduces maintenance and operational costs, delay, travel
time, and vehicle queue lengths
Page 8-37
Applications
Before starting the design of a roundabout, it is very important to
determine the following:
Number and type of lane(s) on each approach and
departure as determined by a capacity analysis
Design vehicle for each movement
Presence of on-street bike lanes
Right-of-way and its availability for acquisition if needed
Existence or lack of sidewalks
Approach grade of each approach
Transit, existing or proposed
Roundabouts can be applied at nearly all intersections, but
are more legible for single-lane approaches
Must have adequate space
Page 8-38
Scramble Phase
Crossings
Sign Indicating Pedestrian Scramble Phase
Description
Provides a separate all-direction red phase in the traffic signal to
allow pedestrians to cross linearly and diagonally. They are most
appropriate in retail districts with heavy volumes of both
pedestrians and motor vehicles, and/or many vehicle turning
movements.
Key Design Features
Signs indicating scramble is permitted
Countdown signals
Markings indicating diagonal cross
Allow pedestrians to cross straight and reduces delay
Benefits
Reduces pedestrian delay for those crossing both
directions
Reduces pedestrian-vehicle conflicts by providing an all-
pedestrian crossing phase
Does not necessarily eliminate regular walk phase
Applications
Exclusive pedestrian phases may be used where turning
vehicles conflict with very high pedestrian volumes and
pedestrian crossing distances are short
Should be used in areas with high pedestrian volumes such
as near shopping centers, downtown, university crossings,
turning movements, etc.
Page 8-39
Signs
Crossings
Pedestrian crossing sign indicating
location of marked pedestrian crossing
Description
Signs alert motorists to the presence of crosswalks and pedestrians.
Center signs can help slow traffic. These are placed according to
the California MUTCD.
Key Design Features
Placed with adequate sight distance and according to
MUTCD standards
Should not block pedestrian view or obstruct pathways
Kept free of graffiti and in good condition
Should have adequate nighttime reflectivity
Benefits
Provides important information
Gives motorists advance warning
Regulatory signs require certain driver actions and can be
enforced
Applications
Overuse of signs can create noncompliance and disrespect
Signs should be placed at locations where appropriate to
enforce certain types of behavior
Uncontrolled crossings
Commonly used signs are pedestrian crossing sign in
advance of marked uncontrolled crossing, pedestrian
crossing sign at uncontrolled crossing, and advance yield
signs
Page 8-40
Speed Feedback Sign
Crossings
Description
Alerts motorists when they are going over the speed limit. Speed
feedback signs are most appropriate where motor vehicles
commonly speed and there are pedestrians or bicyclists.
Key Design Features
Must be placed in conjunction with speed limit sign
Should flash SLOW DOWN message if driver is going
above speed limit
Benefits
Heightens awareness of speed limits
Establishes lower speed limit during school crossing times
Alerts drivers of their actual speed and posted speed
Can record traffic counts and speeds
Applications
Place in school zones or corridors where speeding is a
known issue
Page 8-41
Access Management
Sidewalks
Description
Most conflicts between users occur at intersections and driveways.
The presence of many driveways in addition to the necessary
intersections creates many conflicts between vehicles entering or
leaving a street and bicyclists and pedestrians riding or walking
along the street.
Key Design Features
When possible, new driveways should be minimized and
old driveways should be eliminated or consolidated, and
raised medians should be placed to limit left turns into and
out of driveways
Benefits
Number of conflict points is reduced
Pedestrian crossing opportunities are enhanced with a
raised median
Universal access for pedestrians is easier, since the
sidewalk is less frequently interrupted by driveway slopes
Results in more space available for higher and better uses
Improved traffic flow may reduce the need for road
widening
Applications
New development
Redevelopment
Where driveways make sidewalk inaccessible based on
ADA guidelines
Page 8-42
Streetscape Feature
Sidewalks
Street furniture and landscaping in Portland, Oregon
Description
Well-designed walking environments are enhanced by urban design
elements and street furniture, such as benches, bus shelters, trash
receptacles, and water fountains. Landscaping can create a more
beautiful and sustainable environment.
Key Design Features
Street furniture should be carefully placed to create an
unobstructed path and sight lines for pedestrians
Good-quality street furniture will show that the
community values its public spaces and is more cost-
effective in the long run
Include plans for landscape irrigation and maintenance at
the outset
Ensure adequacy of overhead clearances and detectability
of protruding objects for pedestrians who are blind or
visually impaired
Create a theme
Placemaking
Sustainable drainage
Benefits
Enhances the pedestrian environment
Enlivens commercial districts by providing improved
public space
Encourages visitors and residents to walk to destinations
rather than drive
Applications
Focus improvements in downtown areas and commercial
districts
Landscaping should focus on native plants that will not
require excessive watering or maintenance
Shade-giving trees or shelters are important in jurisdictions
that have high temperatures
Page 8-43
SIDEWALK DESIGN
Sidewalks should provide a comfortable space for pedestrians
between the roadway and adjacent land uses. Sidewalks along city
streets are the most important component of pedestrian mobility.
They provide access to destinations and critical connections
between modes of travel, including automobiles, transit, and
bicycles. General provisions for sidewalks include pathway width,
slope, space for street furniture, utilities, trees and landscaping, and
building ingress/egress.
Sidewalks in the public right-of-way are generally constructed of
concrete, with construction details regarding materials, procedures,
and design specified in the Standard Specifications for Public
Works Construction (SSPWC), along with its companion SSPWC
Standard Plans. However, sidewalks may also be constructed of
and maintained with other materials such as rubber, decomposed
granite, or other hard unyielding surface.
Besides pedestrian mobility, sidewalks also add to people’s outdoor
enjoyment of the landscape, the urban forest, and streetscapes.
Sidewalk maintenance is also important since trees and large shrubs
and plant life are common near and around sidewalks, and root
systems sometimes lift sidewalks and create vertical displacements.
These vertical displacements must be controlled and maintained to
a maximum of 1 inch.
Sidewalks include four distinct zones: the frontage zone, the
pedestrian (aka walking) zone, the furniture zone, and the curb
zone. The minimum widths of each of these zones vary based on
street classifications as well as land uses. The table at the end of
this section recommends minimum widths for each zone for
different street types and land uses.
Frontage Zone
The frontage zone is the portion of the sidewalk located
immediately adjacent to buildings. It provides distance from
buildings, walls, fences, or property lines. It includes space for
building-related features such as entryways and accessible ramps. It
can include landscaping as well as awnings, signs, news racks,
benches, and outdoor café seating. In single-family residential
neighborhoods, landscaping typically occupies the frontage zone.
Pedestrian Zone
The pedestrian zone, situated between the frontage zone and the
furniture zone, is the area dedicated to walking and should be kept
clear of all fixtures and obstructions. Within the pedestrian zone,
the Pedestrian Access Route (PAR) is the path that provides
continuous connections from the public right-of-way to building
and property entry points, parking areas, and public transportation.
This pathway is required to comply with ADA guidelines and is
intended to be a seamless pathway for wheelchair and white cane
Page 8-44
users. As such, this route should be firm, stable, and slip-resistant,
and should comply with maximum cross slope (transverse)
requirements (2 percent grade). The walkway grade (longitudinal)
shall not exceed the general grade of the adjacent street. Aesthetic
textured pavement materials (e.g., brick and pavers) are best used in
the frontage and furniture zones, rather than the PAR. The PAR
should be a minimum of 4 feet, but preferably at least 5 feet in
width, to provide adequate space for two pedestrians to
comfortably pass or walk side by side. All transitions (e.g., from
street to ramp or ramp to landing) must be flush and free of
changes in level. The engineer should determine the pedestrian
zone width to accommodate the projected volume of users. In no
case will this zone be less than the width of the PAR.
Noncompliant driveways often present significant obstacles to
wheelchair users. The cross slope on these driveways is often much
steeper than the 2 percent maximum grade. Driveway aprons that
extend into the pedestrian zone can render a sidewalk impassable
to users of wheelchairs, walkers, and crutches. They need a flat
plane on which to rest all four supports (two in the case of
crutches). To provide a continuous PAR across driveways, aprons
should be confined to the furniture and curb zones.
Furniture Zone
The furniture zone is located between the curb line and the
pedestrian zone. The furniture zone should contain all fixtures,
such as street trees, bus stops and shelters, parking meters, utility
poles and boxes, lamp posts, signs, bike racks, news racks, benches,
waste receptacles, drinking fountains, and other street furniture, to
keep the pedestrian zone free of obstructions. In residential
neighborhoods, the furniture zone is often landscaped. Resting
areas with benches and space for wheelchairs should be provided
in high volume pedestrian districts and along blocks with a steep
grade to provide a place to rest for older adults, wheelchair users,
and others who need to catch their breath.
Curb Zone
The curb zone serves primarily to prevent water and cars from
encroaching on the sidewalk. It defines where the area for
pedestrians begins and the area for cars ends. It is the area people
using assistive devices must traverse to get from the street to the
sidewalk, so its design is critical to accessibility.
Other Sidewalk Guidelines
Landscaped buffers or fences should separate sidewalks
from off-street parking lots or off-street passenger loading
areas.
Pedestrian and driver sight distances should be maintained
near driveways. Fencing and foliage near the intersection
of sidewalks and driveways should ensure adequate sight
distance as vehicles enter or exit.
Where no frontage zone exists, driveway ramps usually
violate cross-slope requirements. In these situations,
sidewalks should be built back from the curb at the
driveway as shown in the adjacent photo.
Construction tolerances require less than one quarter inch
vertical displacement between panel levels
Sidewalks should be maintained so that a 1-inch vertical
displacement is not exceeded.
Page 8-45
LAND USE
Sidewalks will vary according to the type of street and land use. A
local street with residences will require different sidewalk
dimensions than an arterial with commercial establishments. The
descriptions below indicate the type of pedestrian activity expected
at each of the specified land uses. Table 8-1 provides specific
minimum requirements for the four sidewalk zones according to
combinations of land use and street classifications.
Residential Neighborhoods
Residential neighborhoods vary greatly and include a mix of
densities, street network types, housing types, and architectural
styles.
Low/Medium-Density Residential
These streets are typically quieter than others and generally do not
carry transit vehicles or high volumes of traffic. Pedestrians require
a pleasant walking environment in these neighborhoods, as well as
to access land uses and transit on nearby streets. Of the four
sidewalk zones, the furniture zone is often the widest to provide
room for street trees.
Medium/High-Density Residential
These streets support greater volumes of pedestrians. Streets with
transit service require good pedestrian links to bus stops. The
pedestrian zone should be wider than in low/medium-density
residential areas.
Page 8-46
Activity Centers
Activity centers are districts or concentrations of development that
are catalyzed by retail and other complementary uses.
Downtown
Downtown serves as the primary activity center, as a place for
commercial, residential, cultural, educational, and civic activity. The
downtown core or main street is a pedestrian-oriented area. This is
where the greatest numbers of pedestrians are encouraged and
expected. The downtown core serves as the retail, restaurant, and
entertainment center of a community. This area will need the
widest sidewalks, the widest crosswalks, the brightest street
lighting, the most furnishings, and other features that will enhance
the pedestrian environment. Of the four sidewalk zones, the
pedestrian and frontage zones will be favored, with a furniture
zone wide enough for street trees.
Regional Center
These areas have retail, office, civic, and recreational uses
concentrated along major streets. Transit service runs along these
streets and pedestrians need buffers from traffic. Of the four
sidewalk zones, the pedestrian and furniture zones are favored.
These sidewalks also should be designed with the understanding
that a significant number of cars will cross sidewalks as they enter
and exit commercial driveways.
Community Center/Neighborhood Center
These are medium-sized centers that act as community shopping
and gathering spaces. They often have grocers, laundromats,
drugstores, and other neighborhood-serving retail establishments.
Sidewalks in neighborhood commercial areas should accommodate
pedestrians walking from residences to stores. Of the four sidewalk
zones, the pedestrian zone should be the widest, with a generous
frontage zone to provide room for features next to buildings such
as newspaper boxes. These sidewalks should also be designed with
the understanding that cars will cross sidewalks as they enter and
exit commercial driveways.
Page 8-47
Transit-Oriented Districts
Transit-oriented districts are the most active and walkable districts
in the city and feature development types of greater intensity.
Sidewalks with wide pedestrian, frontage, and furniture zones best
suit these areas.
Neighborhood Edges
The major vehicle corridors connect employment centers and
mixed-use activity centers. They are primarily commercial, but
represent an opportunity for shift to intensification of residential
uses, streetscape enhancements, and mixed-use development. They
are primarily along arterial and collector streets, and will need large
furniture zones for bus stop areas and shade-giving trees.
Urban Neighborhoods
Urban neighborhoods are moderately intense clusters of
development that contain a mix of uses. The sidewalks along these
streets should support significant pedestrian volumes due to their
integrated nature and higher densities. Of the four sidewalk zones,
the pedestrian and frontage zones will be favored. Transit service
may run along these streets and sidewalks will require buffers from
traffic.
Workplace Districts
Industrial
Industrial streets are zoned for manufacturing, office warehousing,
and distribution. Pedestrian volumes are likely to be lower here
given that these land uses typically employ fewer people per square
foot than general commercial areas. Employees will need good
sidewalks to get to work.
Office Campuses
These streets are home to national and regional offices of financial
institutions, government, large companies, and other uses. Cities
can expect pedestrians during the morning and evening commutes
walking to and from their cars. Visitors will use the sidewalks
throughout the day, and employees will need them during the
lunch hour. The furniture zone should provide adequate buffer
from parking lots.
Special Campuses
Public Facilities
Public facilities streets, particularly streets near schools, libraries,
and civic centers, require special attention and treatment. High
pedestrian volumes are expected during peak times, such as school
pickup and drop-off, and during the morning and evening
commute hours. Sidewalk design should accommodate these peak
travel times and include adequate furniture zones to buffer
pedestrians from the street. Public facilities are located in various
types of streets ranging from local streets to arterials with transit
service.
Page 8-48
Other Campuses
Sidewalks at special campuses at require special consideration given
the different types of development and uses in each campus.
Table 8-1 lists minimum widths for the frontage, pedestrian,
furniture, and curb zones, as well as minimum total widths. These
minimums should not be considered the design width; in many
cases, wider zones will be needed.
Table 8-1. Minimum Widths
Category Land Use Arterial Collector Local
Residential
Neighborhoods
Low/Medium-
Density
Residential
Not applicable
Frontage: 18″
Pedestrian: 5’
Furniture: 4’, 6’–8’ at bus stops and
where large trees are desired
Curb: 6″
Min. Width: 11’
Frontage: 18″
Pedestrian: 5’
Furniture: 4’
Curb: 6″
Min. Width: 11’
Med/High-
Density
Residential
Frontage: 18″
Pedestrian: 6’
Furniture: 5’, 6’–8’ at bus stops
and where large trees are desired
Curb: 6″
Min. Width: 13’
Frontage: 18”
Pedestrian: 6’
Furniture: 5’, 6’-8’ at bus stops and
where large trees are desired
Curb: 6″
Min. Width: 13’
Frontage: 18″
Pedestrian: 6’
Furniture: 4’, 6’-8’ at bus stops
and where large trees are
desired
Curb: 6″
Min. Width: 12’
Activity Centers
Downtown
Frontage: 30″, 8’ with cafe seating
Pedestrian: 6’
Furniture: 5’, 6’–8’ at bus stops
and where large trees are desired
Curb: 6″
Min. Width: 14’
Frontage: 30”, 8’ with cafe seating
Pedestrian: 6’
Furniture: 5’, 6’–8’ at bus stops and
where large trees are desired
Curb: 6″
Min. Width: 14’
Frontage: 30″, 8’ with cafe
seating
Pedestrian: 6’
Furniture: 5’
Curb: 6″
Min. Width: 14’
Regional Centers
Frontage: 18″
Pedestrian: 6’
Furniture: 5’, 6’–8’ at bus stops
and where large trees are desired
Curb: 6″
Min. Width: 13’
Frontage: 18″
Pedestrian: 6’
Furniture: 5’, 6’–8’ at bus stops and
where large trees are desired
Curb: 6″
Min. Width: 13’
Not applicable
Table 8-1, continued
Page 8-49
Category Land Use Arterial Collector Local
Activity Centers
(continued)
Community/
Neighborhood
Centers
Not applicable
Frontage: 18″
Pedestrian: 6’
Furniture: 5’, 6’–8’ at bus stops and
where large trees are desired
Curb: 6”
Min. Width: 13’
Frontage: 18”
Pedestrian: 6’
Furniture: 4’, 6’–8’ at bus stops
and where large trees are
desired
Curb: 6”
Min. Width: 12’
Transit-Oriented
Districts
Frontage: 30”
Pedestrian: 8’
Furniture: 5’, 6’–8’ at bus stops
and where large trees are desired
Curb: 6”
Min. Width: 16’
Frontage: 30”
Pedestrian: 8’
Furniture: 5’, 6’–8’ at bus stops and
where large trees are desired
Curb: 6”
Min. Width: 16’
Frontage: 18”
Pedestrian: 6’
Furniture: 5’, 6’–8’ at bus stops
and where large trees are
desired
Curb: 6”
Min. Width: 13’
Neighborhood
Edges
Frontage: 18”
Pedestrian: 6’
Furniture: 5’, 6’–8’ at bus stops
and where large trees are desired
Curb: 6”
Min. Width: 13’
Frontage: 18”
Pedestrian: 6’
Furniture: 5’, 6’–8’ at bus stops and
where large trees are desired
Curb: 6”
Min. Width: 13’
Frontage: 18”
Pedestrian: 6’
Furniture: 5’, 6’–8’ at bus stops
and where large trees are
desired
Curb: 6”
Min. Width: 12’
Urban
Neighborhoods
Frontage: 30”, 8’ with cafe seating
Pedestrian: 6’–12’
Furniture: 5’, 6’–8’ at bus stops
and where large trees are desired
Curb: 6”
Min. Width: 14’
Frontage: 30”, 8’ with cafe seating
Pedestrian: 6’–12’
Furniture: 4’, 6’–8’ at bus stops and
where large trees are desired
Curb: 6”
Min. Width: 13’
Frontage: 18”
Pedestrian: 6’–12’
Furniture: 4’
Curb: 6”
Min. Width: 12’
Table 8-1, continued
Page 8-50
Category Land Use Arterial Collector Local
Workplace
Districts
Industrial
Frontage: 18”
Pedestrian: 5’
Furniture: 5’
Curb: 18”
Min. Width: 13’
Frontage: 18”
Pedestrian: 5’
Furniture: 4’
Curb: 18”
Min. Width: 12’
Frontage: 18”
Pedestrian: 5’
Furniture: 4’
Curb: 18”
Min. Width: 12’
Office
Campus
Frontage: 18”
Pedestrian: 5’
Furniture: 5’
Curb: 6”
Min. Width: 12’
Frontage: 18”
Pedestrian: 5’
Furniture: 5’
Curb: 6”
Min. Width: 12’
Not applicable
Special
Campuses
Public
Facilities
Frontage: 30”
Pedestrian: 8’
Furniture: 5’, 6’–8’ at bus stops
and where large trees are desired
Curb: 6”
Min. Width: 16’
Frontage: 30”
Pedestrian: 8’
Furniture: 5’, 6’–8’ at bus stops and
where large trees are desired
Curb: 6”
Min. Width: 16’
Frontage: 18”
Pedestrian: 6’
Furniture: 5’, 6’–8’ at bus stops
and where large trees are
desired
Curb: 6”
Min. Width: 13’
Page 8-51
General Guidelines
For those few areas not covered in Table 8-1, the following list
provides general guidelines for sidewalks:
The recommended minimum frontage zone width is 18
inches.
The recommended minimum pedestrian zone width is 5
feet.
The recommended minimum curb zone width is 6 inches,
or 18 inches where pedestrian or freight loading is
expected and may conflict with obstacles in the furniture
zone.
The recommended minimum furniture zone width is 4
feet, and 6 feet to 8 feet where bus stops exist.
Low curbs (3 to 4 inches high) reduce the division between
the traveled way and the sidewalk. They are favored in
areas with significant pedestrian traffic. Low curbs also
improve the geometry and feasibility of providing two
perpendicular curb ramps per corner.
Some judgment may be needed on a case-by-case basis to
establish actual widths of each of the four zones.
Page 8-52
This page intentionally left blank