Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Package - StudySession_May28_2026 PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION MEETING AGENDA Thursday, May 28, 2026 2:30 p.m. Council Chamber, City Hall 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, California NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the purpose of the Study Session is to review the items listed on the agenda. No action will be taken. This is a joint meeting of the Palm Desert City Council, Successor Agency to the Palm Desert Redevelopment Agency, Palm Desert Housing Authority, and Palm Desert Board of Library Trustees. Pursuant to Senate Bill 707, this meeting may be conducted as a hybrid meeting allowing public access via teleconference or in person, and up to two Councilmembers may attend remotely. WATCH THE MEETING LIVE: Watch the City Council meeting live at the City’s website: https://palmdesert.zoom.us/ or on the City's YouTube Channel. OPTIONS FOR PARTICIPATING IN THIS MEETING: OPTION 1: IN PERSON Attend in person in the Council Chamber, located at 73510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California 92260. OPTION 2: VIA EMAIL Send your comments by email to: CityClerk@palmdesert.gov. Emails received prior to 10:00 a.m. on the day of the City Council meeting will be made part of the record and distributed to the City Council. Emails will not be read aloud at the meeting. OPTION 3: LIVE VIA ZOOM Access via palmdesert.gov/zoom or zoom.us, click “Join Meeting” and enter Webinar ID 833 6744 9572. OPTION 4: LIVE VIA TELEPHONE Call (213) 338-8477 and enter Meeting ID 833 6744 9572 followed by #. Pages 1.CALL TO ORDER - STUDY SESSION 2.STUDY SESSION TOPICS 2.a Potential Drone as First Responder Program and Real-Time Crime Center 5 RECOMMENDATION: Receive a presentation on a potential Drone as First Responder (DFR) program and Real Time Crime Center (RTCC), discuss public safety benefits and community considerations, and provide feedback to staff regarding whether to continue evaluating the concepts for future City Council consideration. 2.b Dave Erwin Park Project Update – Design Progress, Budget Assessment, and Strategic Options 11 RECOMMENDATION: Receive and discuss an update on the Dave Erwin Park project, including the revised project scope, schedule impacts, updated cost estimates, and potential implementation strategies; and provide direction to staff regarding next steps. 3.ADJOURNMENT City Council Study Session May 28, 2026 2 4.PUBLIC NOTICES NOTE: Pursuant to Senate Bill 707, this meeting may be conducted by teleconference. Study Session is accessible in person or on the City’s website: www.palmdesert.gov under the Council Agenda link at the top of the page. Agenda Related Materials: Pursuant to Government Code §54957.5(b)(2) the designated office for inspection of records in connection with this meeting is the Office of the City Clerk, Palm Desert Civic Center, 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert. Staff reports for all agenda items considered in open session, and documents provided to a majority of the legislative bodies are available for public inspection at City Hall and on the City’s website at www.palmdesert.gov by clicking “Meetings & Agenda” at the top of the page. Americans with Disabilities Act: It is the intention of the City of Palm Desert to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) in all respects. If, as an attendee or a participant at this meeting, or in meetings on a regular basis, you will need special assistance beyond what is normally provided, the City will attempt to accommodate you in every reasonable manner. Please contact the Office of the City Clerk, (760) 346-0611, at least 48 hours prior to the meeting to inform us of your needs and to determine if accommodation is feasible. AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING I, Michelle Nance, Assistant City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert, do hereby certify, under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California, that the foregoing agenda for the Palm Desert City Council, Successor Agency for the Palm Desert Redevelopment Agency, and Housing Authority, was posted on the City Hall bulletin board and City website www.palmdesert.gov no less than 72 hours prior to the meeting. /S/ Michelle Nance Assistant City Clerk City Council Study Session May 28, 2026 3 4 Page 1 City of Palm Desert Staff Report Meeting Date: May 28, 2026 Prepared By: Daniel Hurtado, Public Safety Coordinator Department: City Manager’s Office Subject: Study Session on a Potential Drone as First Responder Program and Real-Time Crime Center Recommendation Receive a presentation on a potential Drone as First Responder (DFR) program and Real Time Crime Center (RTCC), discuss public safety benefits and community considerations, and provide feedback to staff regarding whether to continue evaluati ng the concepts for future City Council consideration. Executive Summary The City of Palm Desert and the Riverside County Sheriff’s Office are continuing to evaluate public safety technologies that may improve emergency response, increase situational awareness, and support the efficient deployment of law enforcement resources. Two related concepts currently under review are a Drone as First Responder (DFR) program and a Real-Time Crime Center (RTCC).  Drone as First Responder (DFR): Allows remotely deployed drones to provide real- time aerial observation of selected incidents before or as deputies and emergency personnel arrive on scene.  Real-Time Crime Center (RTCC): A centralized operational hub to support real-time monitoring, analysis, and coordination using approved public safety systems, including drone feeds, automated license plate reader data, dispatch information, live video, analytics, and other law enforcement tools. Both concepts were reviewed by the Cove Communities Services Commission and the City’s Public Safety Committee each of which supported continued evaluation. This Study Session is intended to gather City Council feedback only. No funding, contracts, or implementation decisions are being requested. City Council direction will help determine whether staff should continue refining program scope, costs, governance structure, privacy safeguards, and operational framework for future consideration. Background A Drone as First Responder is a public safety response model in which a drone is deployed to selected calls for service to provide real-time aerial situational awareness. The technology 5 Page 2 allows authorized personnel, including dispatch, field units, and command staff, to observe conditions at or near an incident before responders arrive or while they are en-route. This capability may support a wide range of incidents, including priority calls for service, missing person searches, stolen vehicles, burglaries, traffic collisions, suspicious activity, fire and emergency medical support, approved special events, and other public safety needs. A DFR program is intended to supplement, not replace, deputies, fire personnel, emergency medical services, dispatch judgment, or standard response protocols. It provides additional operational tool to support assessments about hazards, access points, suspect or patient locations, crowd size, traffic impacts, and resource needs. The RTCC concept is a related but separate concept. It functions as a centralized hub where authorized personnel can monitor, evaluate, and coordinate public safety information in real time. This may include drone feeds, automated license plate reader data, dispatch information, live video sources, investigative tools, dashboards, and other approved public safety information systems. Over the past several months, the Riverside County Sheriff’s Office has tested and evaluated multiple drone vendors and platforms within Palm Desert. This local review is intended to compare operational performance under actual Palm Desert conditions, including heat, wind, coverage, connectivity, response time, software usability, and overall reliability. At the April 22, 2026, Cove Communities Services Commission meeting, the Commission discussed the Drone as First Responder and Real-Time Crime Center concepts and the opportunity for each Cove community to independently evaluate the technology within its jurisdiction. Following the discussion, the Commission voted to proceed with bringing the item to each respective City Council for further evaluation. At the May 12, 2026 City of Palm Desert Public Safety Committee, the Committee reviewed the concepts and supported continued evaluation for Palm Desert. Analysis Drone as First Responder (DFR) The Sheriff’s Office evaluation focused on operational reliability, field performance, and overall suitability for Palm Desert conditions. Key evaluation areas include:  Wind performance and flight stability  Heat tolerance and battery performance  Launch reliability and response time  Cellular, radio, and video performance in areas with limited connectivity  Mapping, live-streaming, and software usability  Vendor support, training, maintenance, and service expectations  Operational coverage of major corridors, commercial areas, neighborhoods, trails, washes, and open space 6 Page 3 The program may enhance public safety by providing real-time aerial information before responders arrive on scene. This supports improved situational awareness, faster hazard identification, and more effective resource deployment. It may also improve deputy and public safety, increase operational efficiency, and enhance coordination across Palm Desert, neighboring Cove communities , and the Riverside County Sheriff’s Office. Real-Time Crime Center (RTCC) A Real-Time Crime Center would complement a DFR program by providing a centralized environment where authorized personnel can monitor, analyze, and coordinate public safety information in real time. While not required for a DFR program, an RTCC would enhance the overall effectiveness by enabling coordination of drone feeds with other data sources and public safety systems. This may improve situational awareness during active incidents, major events, and regional emergencies. Potential RTCC functions may include:  Monitoring Drone as First Responder operations  Supporting dispatch and field units during priority calls  Reviewing automated license plate reader information  Supporting major events and planned operations  Coordinating live video and public safety camera feeds (where authorized)  Providing real-time information to command staff and field personnel  Supporting investigations and emergency incidents Potential benefits include improved coordination, faster information sharing, better integration of existing technologies, and more efficient use of public safety resources. Further analysis is required before any recommendation . Key considerations include governance, staffing, data access, privacy protections, public transparency, cost sharing, facility needs, technology integration, and long-term maintenance. Staff is seeking City Council feedback only. If directed to proceed, staff will return with a detailed program proposal, including scope, costs, funding options, governance framework, and any required agreements. Appointed Body Recommendation At the April 22, 2026, Cove Communities Services Commission meeting, the Commission voted to proceed with bringing the Drone as First Responder and Real -Time Intelligence Center concepts to each respective City Council for further e valuation. At the May 12, 2026, City of Palm Desert Public Safety Committee meeting, the Committee reviewed the program concept and supported continued evaluation for Palm Desert. 7 Page 4 Environmental Review This action is not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act because it is an administrative, organizational, procedural, fiscal, or informational activity that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment. Legal Review This report has been reviewed by the City Attorney’s Office. Financial Impact There is no financial impact associated with receiving the presentation and providing feedback . No funding authorization, contract approval, or program implementation is requested. The presentation includes preliminary, non-binding cost estimates for informational purposes to support Council discussion regarding potential future public safety technology investments. These estimates are subject to change based on final program design, scope, coverage area, procurement approach, and whether services are implemented independently or through a regional partnership model. At this time, the estimated costs under consideration are approximately:  Drone as First Responder (DFR) program: approximately $4.3 million over five years (or roughly $847,000 annually) depending on final configuration and deployment model.  Real Time Crime Center (RTIC): approximately $1.2 million in estimated implementation and/or early operational costs, subject to refinement based on s ystem architecture, staffing assumptions, and integration requirements. These figures represent the estimated total program cost for the Cove Communities, including Indian Wells, Palm Desert, and Rancho Mirage. They are provided solely to inform policy discussion and do not represent a final cost obligation for any individual city. No funding source has been identified or committed. Any future consideration of implementation would require separate Council approval, identification of funding, approval of rel ated agreements, and a final cost-share model between the three cities, either through the Cove funding formula or another agreed-upon allocation method. Attachments 1. PowerPoint Presentation to be distributed prior to the meeting 8 Page 5 Conflict of Interest Awareness Checklist Note: This checklist is informational only and does not constitute a legal determination. Each Councilmember remains responsible for identifying, disclosing, and evaluating any disqualifying interests under the Political Reform Act and applicable FPPC regulations. 1. Site-Specific Property Interest Does this item involve a project site or other identifiable real property? ☐ Yes ☒ No If yes, identify the project site: Councilmembers should consider whether they own, lease, or hold interests in real property within 1,000 feet of the project site. (Gov. Code § 87103(b); FPPC Reg. 18702.2). 2. SB 1439 / Gov. Code § 84308 Applicability (Campaign Contributions) Does this item involve a license, permit, other entitlement for use, or a contract or franchise agreement that is not competitively bid, a labor agreement, or a personal employment contract? ☐ Yes ☒ No If yes, identify the applicant(s), appellant(s), party, or participant(s): Councilmembers should review campaign contributions re ceived within the prior 12 months from parties or participants to the proceeding and must not accept contributions over $500 from those parties for 12 months following the final decision. (Gov. Code § 84308). 9 10 Page 1 City of Palm Desert Staff Report Meeting Date: May 28, 2026 Prepared By: Ryan Lamb, Senior Project Manager Shawn Muir, Community Services Manager Department: Capital Projects and Public Works Subject: Dave Erwin Park Project Update – Design Progress, Budget Assessment, and Strategic Options Recommendation Receive and discuss an update on the Dave Erwin Park project, including the revised project scope, schedule impacts, updated cost estimates, and potential implementation strategies; and provide direction to staff regarding next steps. Executive Summary Staff and the project design team will provide an update on the Dave Erwin Park project, including current design progression, schedule impacts, and revised cost estimates. Since approval of the conceptual design in April 2025, additional infrastructure coordination, environmental requirements, stormwater-related improvements, and operational needs have expanded the project scope and affected the anticipate project budget and schedule. The presentation will include an overview of the updated project elements, revised cost estimates, value engineering opportunities, and potential phased implementation strategies. Staff is seeking City Council feedback and direction regarding the preferred implementation approach. Need for Action As design development has progressed, additional technical, infrastructure environmental, and operational requirements have been identified that were not fully defined during the conceptual design phase, resulting in impacts to the project schedule and overall budget. Staff is providing this update so the City Council has a clear understanding of the project status, revised cost estimates, and potential implementation strategies, and to obtain direction regarding the next phase of project development. Background On April 24, 2025, the City Council approved the Concept Design for the new community park located on Dinah Shore Drive in North Palm Desert, as well as the park name, Dave Erwin Park. At that time, the conceptual design included an estimated construction cost of approximately $19 million (excluding soft costs), with construction documents anticipated to be completed and the construction anticipated to begin construction in early 2026. 11 Page 2 Following approval of the concept design, the City’s design consultant, Interwest, determined that an updated topographic survey would be required before construction docum ents could proceed. The survey was completed in August 2025 in accordance with the City’s procurement procedures. Analysis Schedule Impact: Several factors have affected the project schedule, including:  Coordination with the Palm Villas at Millenium development regarding entry points and gate access, as the approved Palm Villas design did not align with the park plans  Coordination with a neighboring property owner regarding abandonment of an existing drainage easement  Retention basin design requirements at the east end of the park  Right-of-way acquisition associated with the east entry  Additional environmental studies These coordination, environmental, and infrastructure-related issues extended the design development phase and delayed completion of construction documents by approximately 12 months. Following City Council direction regarding the preferred project scope and implementation strategy, staff will finalize the revised project schedule, including anticipated timelines for completion of final design, construction bidding, and construction commencement, subject to completion of remaining right-of-way acquisition and permitting activities. Addressing these items during the design phase is intended to reduce potential construction conflicts, redesign efforts, and future change orders during project implementation. Budget Evaluation: The April 24, 2025, Staff Report identified an estimated construction cost of approximately $19 million based on the project’s conceptual design phase. As a conceptual Rough O rder of Magnitude (ROM) estimate, the figure was intended to reflect preliminary direct construction trade costs and did not yet incorporate full project delivery components typically refined during later design phases, including design and engineering, permitting, construction management, contingencies, escalations, insurance, bonding, administrative costs, and contractor overhead and profit. When these standard project delivery costs are incorporated, the original conceptual project estimate equates to an estimated total project cost of approximately $31 million. As design development progressed, additional project elements were identified to support the park’s function as a stormwater retention facility, address operational needs, and accommodate infrastructure improvements not fully defined during conceptual planning. These refinements increased the estimated direct construction cost to approximately $24 million, resulting in an updated total project cost estimate of approximately $37.5 million. 12 Page 3 Primary project refinements include:  Basin 9B  A sound/flood wall along the north property line  Steps and seating surrounding Basin 9A  Off-site traffic improvements  On-site dry utilities  Off-site dry utilities Item April 2025 Concept Design Estimate Current Updated Estimate Direct construction cost estimate Approximately $19 million Approximately $24 million Total “All-In” cost estimate Approximately $31 million Approximately $37.5 million Estimate basis Rough Order of Magnitude based on Concept Design Refined estimate based on early design and added scope Included costs Direct construction trade costs only Direct construction costs plus added scope items Excluded / additional costs Did not include full project delivery costs such as design, permitting, construction management, contingencies, escalation, insurance, bonding, overhead and profit, and administrative fees Standard project delivery costs included in total project cost estimate Reason for increase Concept-level estimate prepared for early planning Added stormwater, infrastructure, operational, and utility-related scope items While the original estimate was appropriate for early planning purposes, the updated budget reflects the expanded project scope and provides a more complete estimate of the total cost to deliver the complete project. Staff will also present potential value engineering opportunities and phased implementation strategies for City Council consideration to help align the project scope, delivery strategy, and available funding resources. The presentation will also review value engineering opportunities and poten tial phased implementation strategies for City Council consideration, with the goal of aligning the project scope and delivery approach with available resources. Legal Review This report has been reviewed by the City Attorney’s Office. Financial Impact There is no fiscal impact associated with this presentation, as no formal action is being taken at this time. Funding for park design activities has been included in the Fiscal Year 2025-26 Annual Budget and Five-Year Capital Improvement Program Plan. 13 Page 4 Attachments 1. Staff Report approving Concept Design and naming of Dave Erwin Park 2. Presentation to be provided prior to the meeting 14 Page 5 Conflict of Interest Awareness Checklist Note: This checklist is informational only and does not constitute a legal determination. Each Councilmember remains responsible for identifying, disclosing, and evaluating any disqualifying interests under the Political Reform Act and applicable FPPC regulations. 1. Site-Specific Property Interest Does this item involve a project site or other identifiable real property? ☒ Yes ☐ No If yes, identify the project site: The proposed park is located in northern Palm Desert, south of Interstate 10, east of Portola Road, and on Dinah Shore Drive, with Gerald Ford Drive located further south. Councilmembers should consider whether they own, lease, or hold interests in real property within 1,000 feet of the project site. (Gov. Code § 87103(b); FPPC Reg. 18702.2). 2. SB 1439 / Gov. Code § 84308 Applicability (Campaign Contributions) Does this item involve a license, permit, other entitlement for use, or a contract or franchise agreement that is not competitively bid, a labor agreement, or a personal employment contract? ☐ Yes ☒ No If yes, identify the applicant(s), appellant(s), party, or participant(s): Councilmembers should review campaign contributions received within the prior 12 months from parties or participants to the proceeding and must not accept contributions over $500 from those parties for 12 months following the final decision. (Gov. Code § 84308). 15 16 YES: 5 NO: 0 ABSTAIN: 0 CONFLICT: 0 ABSENT: 0 ALL ACTIONS ARE DRAFT PENDING APPROVAL OF THE FINAL MINUTES Minute Action Summary Palm Desert City Council - Regular Meeting Agenda Number:14.a. Title:APPROVE FINAL CONCEPT PLAN AND NAME FOR NORTH PALM DESERT COMMUNITY PARK (PROJECT NO. CPK00002) Date:Thursday, April 24, 2025 Motion by:Councilmember Nestande Seconded by:Councilmember Pradetto Approve the final concept plan for a new community park planned on Dinah Shore in north Palm Desert. YES: 5 NO: 0 ABSTAIN: 0 CONFLICT: 0 ABSENT: 0 Motion Carried Mayor Harnik Councilmember Pradetto Councilmember Nestande Mayor Pro Tem Trubee Councilmember Quintanilla 17 Page 1 of 6 CITY OF PALM DESERT STAFF REPORT MEETING DATE: April 24, 2025 PREPARED BY: Shawn Muir, Community Services Manager SUBJECT: APPROVE FINAL CONCEPT PLAN AND NAME FOR NORTH PALM DESERT COMMUNITY PARK (PROJECT NO. CPK00002) RECOMMENDATION: 1. Approve the final concept plan for a new community park planned on Dinah Shore in north Palm Desert. 2. Approve the Park name “Dave Erwin Park”. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: As part of the Millennium Specific Plan in north Palm Desert, a 27 -acre park was initially proposed to provide outdoor recreational opportunities for local residents. The City of Palm Desert General Plan identifies the need for a park in this area. On February 10, 2022, City staff sought direction from the City Council regarding developing a Request for Proposals (RFP) for the design of the North Sphere Regional Park (NSRP). The City Council directed staff to collaborate with the Parks and Recreation Committee and key community partners—including Family YMCA of the Desert, The Joslyn Center, and the Desert Recreation District—to develop a community-focused park design responsive to programmatic needs. The City Council also emphasized the importance of inclusive public engagement throughout the process. A Parks and Recreation Commission subcommittee was formed and met on March 15, 2022, to discuss the RFP and evaluate the suitability of the original park site. The subcommittee recommended that the city explore expanding the site or relocating the park to better accommodate regional park features. An RFP was subsequently developed and posted. Concurrently, staff identified a need to consider additional or alternate park sites that would accommodate the uses and amenities that may be needed to support the city’s growth. A new site was identified, and the RFP was updated accordingly. On August 25, 2022, a contract was awarded for the design of two north Palm Desert parks: a 27-acre community park on Dinah Shore Drive, and a separate regional sports park near Portola Avenue and Frank Sinatra Drive. The scope includes robust community engagement, full construction documents for the community park, and 30% design plans for the regional park. 78318 City of Palm Desert Approve Final Concept Plan and Name for North Palm Desert Community Park Page 2 of 6 Public Engagement: The planning process featured extensive public engagement efforts, including: Two online surveys Four in-person “Open House” events Focus group meetings with key stakeholders The first conceptual design was presented to the following groups for feedback: Parks and Recreation Committee – 06/06/2023 Architectural Review Commission – 06/13/2023 Cultural Arts Committee – 06/14/2023 Resource Preservation & Enhancement Committee – 06/19/2023 General Public (Zoom HOA Presentation) – 06/20/2023 Planning Commission – 06/20/2023 City Council – 06/22/2023 Parks and Recreation Committee – 11/07/2023 City Council (Initial Approval) – 12/14/2023 Parks and Recreation Committee – 09/16/2024 Further community feedback was gathered during the 2025 Wildflower Festival and a subsequent Open House event on March 22, 2025, following an updated conceptual design. Key Revisions Based on Community Input: The conceptual design was updated to reflect public feedback, including: A 75-foot-wide landscaped buffer along Dinah Shore Drive (from the traffic circle to Gerald Ford Drive) required by the Millennium Specific Plan Development Agreement Relocated primary park access to Dinah Shore Drive Repositioned the main parking lot for improved access to amenities Addition of community-requested features such as disc golf, a community garden, and bocce ball The revised design was presented to the Parks and Recreation Committee on September 16, 2024, where additional comments were received. The design was further modified to reflect those comments in preparation for presentation to the City Council. The design includes the following: Two surface parking lots (250-car and 32-car capacity) Large retention basin Multi-sensory inclusive children’s play area Basketball court Four pickleball courts with wind abatement features Pavilion shelters with BBQ stands Interconnected walking paths Plazas and adaptable garden spaces Large and small dog parks 78419 City of Palm Desert Approve Final Concept Plan and Name for North Palm Desert Community Park Page 3 of 6 Multi-use lawn areas and community garden Disc golf, bocce ball, and outdoor fitness equipment Next Steps: Upon City Council approval of the final conceptual design, the consultant will begin the design development phase, including preparing construction documents. Plan review by City staff is scheduled at the 30%, 60%, and 90% design stages, with final plans expected by November 2025. Permitting is anticipated by December 2025, with construction bids to be advertised in January/February 2026. Construction is projected to begin in March 2026 and take approximately 16–18 months to complete. Estimated Construction Cost: Based on a rough order-of-magnitude estimate reflecting the final concept plan, the total project construction cost is approximately $19 million. Park Feature / Amenity Estimated Construction Cost Retaining basin – precise grading, retaining walls, etc. $1,650,000 Site preparation for construction $805,000 Parking lot and drive aisles $2,872,500 Walking paths, hardscape area, specialty paving designs $3,241,291 Landscape planting, sod and irrigation $3,164,987 Lighting $2,040,000 Children’s Play Area and Ninja Course – Equipment, PIP & Shade Elements 1,825,000 Community Garden $392,500 Restroom Facilities $1,300,000 Sound Wall / Fence (Fronting Railroad and Highway) $717,750 Park Furnishings $989,000 Total $18,998,028 Legal Review: This report has been reviewed by the City Attorney’s Office. Strategic Plan: Parks & Recreation – Priority 1: “Prepare for the financial requirements of maintaining existing parks to the highest level of service. Planning efforts shall also address future costs of replacement and growth of the park’s capital improvement fund.” Parks & Recreation – Priority 2: “Assure a continuing flow of innovative ideas by seeking creative partnerships, ensuring adequate staffing, and encouraging resident input.” Transportation – Priority 1: “Create walkable neighborhoods and areas within Palm Desert that would include residential; retail; services and employment centers; and parks, recreation , and open space to reduce the use of low occupancy vehicles.” Appointed Body Recommendation: At its meeting on June 6, 2023, the Parks and Recreation Committee reviewed a presentation on the community park design and provided initial feedback. Interwest subsequently revised the 78520 City of Palm Desert Approve Final Concept Plan and Name for North Palm Desert Community Park Page 4 of 6 plans to reflect input from both the Committee and the broader community and presented the updated designs to the Committee on November 7, 2023. At that meeting, the Committee voted to approve the revised design and recommended that the City Council consider permitting the use of the park’s fields for organized sports, citing the growing demand for field space. Following further community engagement, an updated conceptual design was presented to the Committee on September 16, 2024. The Committee unanimously voted to advance the design, with two key recommendations: Swap the locations of the playground and sports core to improve visibility and accessibility for families utilizing both the basin and playground areas. Relocate the splash pad to the center of the park to establish it as a focal feature. Both recommendations have been incorporated into the final design. Park Naming Subcommittee On May 14, 2015, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2015 -33, establishing the Parks & Facilities Naming Policy. The policy outlines the following core naming principles: A distinct geographic, environmental, or developmental feature A neighborhood, community, or access street A name of historical significance to the facility A reflection of the community’s ethnic diversity An individual or family who has made significant contributions to the community or facility A major donor or corporate entity The Parks Naming Subcommittee convened on April 30 and September 16, 2024, to discuss naming opportunities for various parks, including five pocket parks in University Park, a future community park, and a planned regional park. In alignment with the naming policy, the subcommittee determined that the community park should be named in honor of an individual who has had a meaningful and lasting impact on the community. After careful consideration, the subcommittee unanimously recommended naming the park after Dave Erwin, the City’s first City Attorney upon its incorporation in 1973. This recommendation was presented to the Parks and Recreation Committee at its January 7, 2025, meeting. The Committee reviewed and approved the proposal, recognizing Mr. Erwin’s enduring contributions to the City and affirming that his legacy reflects the City’s core values and mission. City staff subsequently reached out to Mr. Erwin’s family. His wife expressed her appreciation and called the recognition a great honor. Environment Review: The North Palm Desert Community Park is identified in the City of Palm Desert General Plan, adopted by the City Council on November 10, 2016, and was evaluated for compliance with the 78621 City of Palm Desert Approve Final Concept Plan and Name for North Palm Desert Community Park Page 5 of 6 California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as part of the certified General Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (SCH No. 2015081020). The project is also included in the Millennium Specific Plan, adopted on March 26, 2015, and further analyzed under CEQA through the Millennium Specific Plan Initial Study. The study concluded that the project would not result in any significant environmental effects that are specific to the site or project. As such, the Community Park qualifies for a CEQA exemption under CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 – Projects Consistent with a Community Plan or Zoning. Additional environmental studies—including traffic, noise, air quality, and lighting analyses—are planned to support and inform the project. Any necessary amendments to the CEQA documentation will be prepared accordingly. A Notice of Exemption (NOE), documenting the project's eligibility under Section 15183, will be filed with the County Clerk upon final approval of the North Palm Desert Community Park. FINANCIAL IMPACT: This project is included in the approved Capital Improvement Project (CIP) List for Fiscal Year 2024-25. Current funding for the design cost totals $1,658,400, which includes comprising 1,008,400 allocated under Account No. 2334670-5000201 and $650,000 under 4514618- 5000913, bond proceeds. The FY 2025–26 Capital Improvement Plan includes a $16 million allocation from the General Fund for the construction of the community park, which was the original estimate. The total estimated construction cost of the project is now $19 million; however, staff will co ntinue to vet this estimate during the finalization of the construction documents. Thereafter, staff will return to the City Council to request an appropriation for the total project cost. Additionally, staff is pursuing grant opportunities to support the project’s construction. Construction documents are expected to be completed by late 2025, at which point the project will be advertised for construction bidding. The table below provides a detailed breakdown of project current costs: Description Current Budget Project Current Cost Current Balance FY 2022/23 - 2334670-5000201 $1,000,000 FY 2022/23 – 2334670-500201 Transfer $8,400 FY 2023/24 - 4514618-5000913 $500,000 FY 2024/25 – 4514618-5000913 $150,000 C43900 – Interwest - Design $1,000,000.00 C43900 – Interwest – Amendment 1 $230,095.00 C43900 – Interwest – Contingency $100,000.00 A43530 – HR Green Consulting – Financial Review $8,400.00 C44810 – Answer Advisory – Surveying $14,876.47 C44820 – Marrs Services – Pre-Construction $178,863.00 Project Total $1,658,400 $1,532,235.47 $126,164.53 CVMC Grant Reimbursement $300,000.00 Project Current Fund Balance $426,164.53 includes cost for North Sphere Regional Park 78722 City of Palm Desert Approve Final Concept Plan and Name for North Palm Desert Community Park Page 6 of 6 ATTACHMENTS: 1. Desert Sun Article – Dave Erwin 2. Final Concept Plan 78823 Longtime Palm Desert City Attorney David Erwin dies Sherry Barkas, The Desert Sun David Erwin, Palm Desert’s attorney since before the city’s incorporation in 1973, has died, his law firm confirmed Monday. Erwin died Saturday, said Denise Nix, spokeswoman for Best Best & Krieger, where Erwin was a partner. He was 81. Dave Erwin was Palm Desert’s first and only city attorney. His long and illustrious association with Palm Desert predates the city’s existence as he helped to draft the documents that led to our incorporation in 1973,” City Manager John Wohlmuth said. “Dave’s 42 years of skillful, loyal and dedicated service to Palm Desert is deeply appreciated by all of us who had the privilege of knowing and working with him is one reason that Palm Desert remains such a uniquely wonderful community.” Mayor Pro Tem Bob Spiegel, currently the longest serving member of the City Council with 21 years, echoed Wohlmuth’s comments. He did an excellent job as our attorney,” Spiegel said. There was never a complaint against him. His (contract) was always renewed by the City Council and there was never anybody who wanted to get rid of him.” Spiegel said Erwin was also a close friend and he had planned to visit Erwin in the hospital Monday afternoon. We would go to lunch together and he would listen to me complain ... but never told me what to do,” Spiegel said. Erwin, who lived in Indian Wells, last attended a City Council meeting on Oct. 8. He died Saturday in a local hospital with his wife, Travis Erwin, and their two grown children, Scott and Stephanie, around him, longtime co -worker and Deputy City Attorney Robert Hargreaves said. Erwin joined Best Best & Krieger in October 1986, working out of its Indian Wells office. Prior to that, he was with the firm of Erwin, Andelson & Eldred as well as Marsh, Moore & Cologne in the Coachella Valley. A 1958 graduate of the University of Oklahoma School of Law, Erwin provided legal services to a variety of cities, including Indio, Indian Wells, Rancho Mirage, Desert Hot Springs, Cathedral City and Needles, according to the Best Best & Krieger website. Although I never had the privilege to work with Dave, our paths crossed frequently as colleagues,” said Steve Quintanilla, city attorney for Rancho Mirage, Desert Hot Springs and Moreno Valley. Dave will be remembered as one of the ‘greats’ among the city attorney community in California. 2178924 He has definitely been a great role model for many city attorneys such as myself. He will be missed by many of us who can only try to follow and fill the huge footprints he has left behind,” Quintanilla said. The City Council will consider appointing Hargreaves to fill Erwin’s spot, city spokesman David Hermann said. The city’s current contract with Best Best & Krieger expires in 2019, he said. Hargreaves and Erwin worked together for 30 years. He was a mentor to a whole generation of attorneys, including myself,” Hargreaves said Monday. He was a very gracious person; very personable and always treated people very well. I think I saw him get mad once.” Erwin, who was also an estate planner, loved being a lawyer and helping people, Hargreaves said, adding that Erwin’s work ethic was unlike that of anyone he’s known. People would come to him with all kinds of problems – mostly legal but others as well – and he would help them work through them,” he said. His health was failing him, but he refused to stop working. He wanted to work until he couldn’t anymore,” Hargreaves said. Erwin grew up in a small town in Oklahoma and moved to the Coachella Valley in the 1950s, Hargreaves said. He was involved in the community, serving on a variety of boards including the Boys & Girls Clubs of Coachella Valley and the Bob Hope Chrysler Classic -- today the CareerBuilder Challenge. Dave was a volunteer on the Board of the Desert Classic Charities and donated his time by giving advice to Eisenhower’s foundation department particularly for planned giving and estate giving. He will be greatly missed,” said Michael Landes, president of the Eisenhower Medical Center Foundation. A memorial service is planned for 10 a.m. Nov. 20 at St. Margaret’s Episcopal Church in Palm Desert and is open to the public. https://www.desertsun.com/story/news/local/palm-desert/2015/11/09/palm-desert-city-attorney- david-erwin-with-best-best--krieg-dies/75465994/ 2279025 79126 79227 CITY OF PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL - UPDATE PRESENTATION COMMUNITY PARK APRIL 24, 2025 COMMUNITY PARK UPDATE PRESENTATION CITY OF PALM DESERT City Council Interwest + Calvin, Giordano & Associates, Inc. 79328 CITY OF PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL - UPDATE PRESENTATION COMMUNITY PARK APRIL 24, 2025 2 Community Park Naming 79429 CITY OF PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL - UPDATE PRESENTATION APRIL 24, 2025COMMUNITYPARK 3 Resolution 2015-33 May 14, 2015, Parks & Facilities Naming Policy Naming Principles: A distinct geographic, environmental or developmental feature A neighborhood, community, or access street A name historical significance to the facility A reflection of the ethnic diversity of the community A person or family who has contributed to the community or facility A significant donor or corporate entity Naming Policy Procedure: Parks and Recreation Committee to review and make a recommendation to City Council City Council final approval 79530 CITY OF PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL - UPDATE PRESENTATION APRIL 24, 2025COMMUNITYPARK 4 2024, Park Naming Subcommittee was formed On January 3, 2025, the Parks and Recreation Committee recommended approval to name the Community Park after Dave Erwin Dave Erwin’s legacy and contributions to the community align with the core values and mission of the parks, making him an ideal namesake for this important public space. Dave Erwin’s family is in support 79631 CITY OF PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL - UPDATE PRESENTATION COMMUNITY PARK APRIL 24, 2025 5 Community Park Final Concept Plan 79732 CITY OF PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL - UPDATE PRESENTATION APRIL 24, 2025COMMUNITYPARK 6 02 01 What are the proposed changes Community feedback 03 Next Steps 79833 CITY OF PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL - UPDATE PRESENTATION COMMUNITY PARK APRIL 24, 2025 7 01 What are the proposed changes 79934 CITY OF PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL - UPDATE PRESENTATION APRIL 24, 2025COMMUNITYPARK 8 WHAT ARE THEPROPOSEDCHANGES01ParkLocationInters ta t e 1 0 Dinah Shore Drive Gerald Ford Drive Frank Sinatra35 CITY OF PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL - UPDATE PRESENTATION APRIL 24, 2025COMMUNITYPARK 9 WHAT ARE THE PROPOSED CHANGES01Key Take-Aways for Advancing to Schematic Design Providing primary access from Dinah Shore Drive; alleviating the access demands on Technology Drive. Ensuring we maintain two readily-accessible points of access and egress for improved safety and emergency response.Locating parking closer to all park amenities. All previously-approved park elements and components are included.Additional features include a second restroom, a community garden, bocce courts, and36 CITY OF PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL - UPDATE PRESENTATION APRIL 24, 2025COMMUNITYPARK 10 WHATARETHEPROPOSED CHANGES014000ftImage © 2025 AirbusImage © 2025 Airbus Image © 2025 Airbus DINAH SHORE DRIVE TECHNOLOGY DRIVE DinahShoreDriveAccessInters ta t e 1 0 Gerald Ford37 CITY OF PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL - UPDATE PRESENTATION APRIL 24, 2025COMMUNITYPARK 11 WHAT ARE THE PROPOSED CHANGES01BIKE RACK STATION SHARROWS EXISTING BIKE & GOLFCART LANESROUNDABOUT 2025Google 2025 Google 2025 Google PROPOSED BIKE & GOLF CART LANES MODIFICATION DIAGRAM Dinah38 CITY OF PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL - UPDATE PRESENTATION APRIL 24, 2025COMMUNITYPARK 12WHAT39 CITY OF PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL - UPDATE PRESENTATION APRIL 24, 2025COMMUNITYPARK 13WHAT40 CITY OF PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL - UPDATE PRESENTATION APRIL 24, 2025COMMUNITYPARK 14WHAT41 CITY OF PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL - UPDATE PRESENTATION APRIL 24, 2025COMMUNITYPARK 15 WHAT ARE THE PROPOSED CHANGES01RR GERALD FORD DR SON N Y B O N O M E M F W Y PLAYGROUND COMMUNITY GARDEN DOG PARKS RESTROOM RESTROOM BOCCE MAINTENANCE YARD POLLINATOR GARDEN PARKING 235 EVENT AREA CLOUD PLAZA - SPLASH PAD EVENT AREA PARKING 32 DISC GOLFPROJECT BOUNDARY EASEMENTS 160 5000 FITNESS & AGILITY EQUIPMENT PICKLEBALL (4) BASKETBALL (1)LAWN AREAREQUIRED LANDSCAPE BUFFER DI N A HS H ORE D R I V E TEXT AMENITIES42 CITY OF PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL - UPDATE PRESENTATION APRIL 24, 2025COMMUNITYPARK 16 WHAT ARE THE PROPOSED CHANGES01RR DINAH SHORE DRGERALD FORDDR SO N N Y B O N O M E M FW Y PROJECT BOUNDARY EASEMENTS 160 5000 LOOP DISTANCE 0.3 MI LOOP DISTANCE 0.5 MI LOOP DISTANCE 0.3 MI LOOP DISTANCE 0. 1 MI PARKING 235 PARKING 32 LOOP DISTANCE 1.1 MI VEHICULAR ACCESS43 CITY OF PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL - UPDATE PRESENTATION APRIL 24, 2025COMMUNITYPARK 17 WHAT ARE THE PROPOSED CHANGES01Parks and Recreation Committee recommendations:Swap the playground and sports core areas to provide better opportunities for families to observe children in both the basin and playground. Relocate the splash pad to the center of the park, making it44 CITY OF PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL - UPDATE PRESENTATION APRIL 24, 2025COMMUNITYPARK 18 WHAT ARE THE PROPOSED CHANGES01GERALD FORD DR SON N Y B O N O M E M F W Y PLAYGROUND COMMUNITY GARDEN DOG PARKS RESTROOM RESTROOM BOCCE MAINTENANCE YARD POLLINATOR GARDEN PARKING 235 EVENT AREA CLOUD PLAZA - SPLASH PAD EVENT AREA PARKING 32 DISC GOLFPROJECT BOUNDARY EASEMENTS 160 5000 FITNESS & AGILITY EQUIPMENT PICKLEBALL (4) BASKETBALL (1)LAWN AREAREQUIRED LANDSCAPE BUFFER DI N A HS H ORE D R I V E PALM PLAZA TEXT AMENITIES TEXT P&45 CITY OF PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL - UPDATE PRESENTATION APRIL 24, 2025COMMUNITYPARK 19 WHAT ARE THE PROPOSED CHANGES01RR REQUIRED LANDSCAPE BUFFER LAWN MALL NEW ACCESS POINT LAWN MALL REQUIRED LANDSCAPE BUFFERFARMERS MARKET46 CITY OF PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL - UPDATE PRESENTATION APRIL 24, 2025COMMUNITYPARK 20WHAT47 CITY OF PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL - UPDATE PRESENTATION APRIL 24, 2025COMMUNITYPARK 21WHAT48 CITY OF PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL - UPDATE PRESENTATION APRIL 24, 2025COMMUNITYPARK 22WHAT49 CITY OF PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL - UPDATE PRESENTATION APRIL 24, 2025COMMUNITYPARK 23WHAT50 CITY OF PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL - UPDATE PRESENTATION APRIL 24, 2025COMMUNITYPARK 24WHAT51 CITY OF PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL - UPDATE PRESENTATION APRIL 24, 2025COMMUNITYPARK 25WHAT52 CITY OF PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL - UPDATE PRESENTATION APRIL 24, 2025COMMUNITYPARK 26WHAT53 CITY OF PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL - UPDATE PRESENTATION APRIL 24, 2025COMMUNITYPARK 27WHAT54 CITY OF PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL - UPDATE PRESENTATION APRIL 24, 2025COMMUNITYPARK 28WHAT55 CITY OF PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL - UPDATE PRESENTATION APRIL 24, 2025COMMUNITYPARK 29WHAT56 CITY OF PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL - UPDATE PRESENTATION APRIL 24, 2025COMMUNITYPARK 30 WHATARETHE PROPOSED57 CITY OF PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL - UPDATE PRESENTATION APRIL 24, 2025COMMUNITYPARK 31 WHATARETHE PROPOSED58 CITY OF PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL - UPDATE PRESENTATION APRIL 24, 2025COMMUNITYPARK 32 WHATARETHE PROPOSED59 CITY OF PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL - UPDATE PRESENTATION APRIL 24, 2025COMMUNITYPARK 33 WHATARETHE PROPOSED60 CITY OF PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL - UPDATE PRESENTATION COMMUNITY PARK APRIL 24, 2025 34 02 Community Feedback 82661 CITY OF PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL - UPDATE PRESENTATION APRIL 24, 2025COMMUNITYPARK 35 COMMUNITY FEEDBACK02Wildflower Festival Booth62 CITY OF PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL - UPDATE PRESENTATION APRIL 24, 2025COMMUNITYPARK 36 COMMUNITY FEEDBACK02Online Survey63 CITY OF PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL - UPDATE PRESENTATION APRIL 24, 2025COMMUNITYPARK 37 COMMUNITY FEEDBACK02Open House64 CITY OF PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL - UPDATE PRESENTATION APRIL 24, 2025COMMUNITYPARK 38 COMMUNITY FEEDBACK02Open House65 CITY OF PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL - UPDATE PRESENTATION APRIL 24, 2025COMMUNITYPARK 39 COMMUNITY FEEDBACK02Key Take-Aways from Community Engagement Overall, residents expressed excitement about the park design.The final plan reflected the community’s preference.Strong community support for disk golf.Strong support for addition of a community garden.Support for lighting, provided there is no organized sports lighting.Support for all proposed activation uses. Some residents would rather not include a basketball court.More shade structures rather than waiting for trees to grow in.No overnight parking.66 CITY OF PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL - UPDATE PRESENTATION COMMUNITY PARK APRIL 24, 2025 40 03 Next Steps 83267 CITY OF PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL - UPDATE PRESENTATION APRIL 24, 2025COMMUNITYPARK 41 NEXT STEPS03GERALD FORD DR SO N N YB O N O M E M F W Y PLAYGROUND COMMUNITY GARDEN DOG PARKS RESTROOM RESTROOM BOCCE MAINTENANCE YARD POLLINATOR GARDEN PARKING 235 EVENT AREA CLOUD PLAZA - SPLASH PAD EVENT AREA PARKING 32 DISC GOLF PROJECT BOUNDARY EASEMENTS160 5000 FITNESS & AGILITY EQUIPMENT PICKLEBALL ( 4)BASKETBALL ( 1)LAWN AREA REQUIRED LANDSCAPE BUFFERDI N A H S H OR E DRI V E PALM PLAZA Recommendation68 CITY OF PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL - UPDATE PRESENTATION APRIL 24, 2025COMMUNITYPARK 42 NEXT STEPS03April 2025 May 2025 May – June 2025 July – Sept 2025 Oct – Nov 2025 December 2025 Jan – Feb 2026 March 2026 Presentation to City Council, Commence preparation of construction plans Commence any necessary CEQA studies/items needed Preparation of 30% Plans Preparation of 60% Plans Preparation of 90% Plans Permitting Bidding and Contractor Selection/ Negotiation Start of Construction Targeted Schedule69 CITY OF PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL - UPDATE PRESENTATION COMMUNITY PARK APRIL 24, 2025 43 Thank you 83570 83671 CITY OF PALM DESERT CITY MANAGER’S OFFICE INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM Date: April 24, 2025 To: Honorable Mayor and Councilmembers From: Anthony J. Mejia, City Clerk Subject: City Council Meeting of April 24, 2025 Below you will find questions received from the Mayor or Councilmembers and answers provided by City staff regarding tonight’s City Council meeting: ITEM 13m: PALM DESERT RECREATIONAL FACILITIES CORPORATION AUDITED FINANCIAL REPORTS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2024 Q: a. What was the source of funding used to eliminate the $1.06 million position deficit? b. How many times has the corporation been in arrears in the past 10 years? c. How many times has the City intervened to eliminate the deficit? c. Is a City contribution of $1.3 million considered typical? A: The Palm Desert Recreation Facilities Corporation (PDRFC) was established to manage the food and beverage (F&B) operations at Desert Willow Golf Course (GC), as the City as owner is not permitted to hold an alcoholic beverage license. PDRFC operates as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit entity and, as such, requires a separate component unit audit to comply with regulatory and tax requirements. Historically, the F&B operations at Desert Willow have reported a net operating loss. A key contributing factor is the annual rent charged by Desert Willow to PDRFC in order to maintain the necessary legal separation for tax purposes—despite the fact that the facility functions operationally as a single unit. Over nearly 30 years, this rent—coupled with the structural requirement to show PDRFC as a distinct entity—has resulted in an accumulated paper loss exceeding $1 million. It is important to note that the overall Desert Willow operations, inclusive of the PDRFC-reported losses, continue to generate positive operating income annually. However, the appearance of a substantial loss within the PDRFC audit has raised concerns among residents, particularly in FY 2023–24. These concerns stem largely from a lack of clarity around the legal distinction between Desert Willow and PDRFC. To improve transparency and better communicate the financial reality to residents—especially those without an accounting background—for FY 2023-24, staff was directed to reflect in the audit(s) the inter-entity transfer that would occur if golf course and F&B operations were accounted for as a single entity (how operations would typically be reflected). In the past, a book entry was not completed but the lease was recognized in the Notes Section of the City’s financials and not clear in the PDRFC financials. The “Transfer from City” reflected in the FY 2023-24 PDRFC Financials are from the Desert Willow Enterprise Fund, not the General 83772 04/24/2025 Question & Answer Memo Page 2 of 2 Fund. While PDRFC exists solely due to licensing requirements, its financial results are inherently tied to and part of the broader Desert Willow operations. ITEM 14a: APPROVE FINAL CONCEPT PLAN AND NAME FOR NORTH PALM DESERT COMMUNITY PARK (PROJECT NO. CPK00002) Q1: What other names were considered for the North Palm Desert Community Park, and could you provide a copy of Resolution 2015-33? A1: Below are the other names that the subcommittee considered. Ernie Hahn Cliff Henderson Buford Crites Hal Rover Option 2 was College Mascots Aztec Park Bulldog Park Bear Park Mustang Park Roadrunner Park Option 3 was Landscape names Acacia Park Lantana Park Ocotillo Park Golden Barrel Park Brittlebush Park Q2: Please provide a copy of Resolution 2015-33. A2: Staff has attached a copy of Resolution 2015-33 for reference. 83873