Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPP 11-83 INDUSTRIAL BUILDINS/BOARDWALK 1983 PRECISE PLAN _ TENTATIVIt TRACT . -- --- ZONE CHANGE PARCEL MAP VARIANCE U. U. P. -- REFER TO : -.I APPLICANT M o � G E LOCATION 64ST S a� oi- 8o aR � ✓Ac C � � SI' ✓.a titcs c �cE Sr REQUEST Z�� yo 67B A z, S EXISTING ZONE PREPARATION PROGRESS _ DATE BY COMMENTS APPLICATION RECEIVED 715 - I LEGAL PUBLICATION SENT F -14I Pi NOTICES SENT pJ FIELD INVESTIGATION DEPTS . NOTIFIED BUILDING - 1 -93 ENGINEERING FIRE POLICE RECREATION & PARKS SCHOOL DISTRICT DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS FLOOD CONTROL 6-77C SGE �f C'f7 Cdw() PRELIMINARY MEETING m!!�)C PLAVA STAFF REPORT r - FINAL PLAN APPROVAL PRECISE PLAN ( 6) LANDSCAPING PLAN ( 5 ) PLAN . DIRECTOR MOD. (6 ) HEARINGS & ACTIONS DATE ACTION VOTE REVIEW BOARD HEARING PC. HEARING PUBLISHED PC. PUBLIC HEARING APPLICANT NOTIFIED C.C. PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE NO. RESOLUTION NO . EFFECTIVE DATE RECORDED FOR DATA - BANK ZONING MAP CORRECTED I i '}f ,J 1 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 6, 1983 Commissioner Downs commented that this was the nicest project he had seen and approved. Moved by Commissioner Crites, seconded by Commissioner Erwood, to adopt findings as recommended by staff; carried unanimously 5-0. Moved by Commissioner Crites, seconded by Commissioner Downs, to adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 881, recommending to City Council approval of C/Z 04-83; Planning Commission Resolution No. 882 approving TT 18986 and, HDP 01-83 subject to conditions; carried unanimously 5-0. D. CASE NO. CUP 19-83 - PALM DESERT TOWN CENTER ASSOCIATES, APPLICANT Request for approval of a conditional use permit to allow the construction and operation of a car wash and gasoline station at the northwesterly portion of the Palm Desert Town Center adjacent to E1 Paseo in the the PC (3) S.P. zone (regional commercial with a scenic preservation overlay) previously assessed for CEQA purposes. Mr. Diaz reviewed the staff report and noted that three conditions should be added by the director of public works. 1. Complete grading plans and specifications shall be submitted as required by ordinance to the city engineer for checking and approval before construction is commenced. 2. Landscaping maintenance on El Paseo shall be provided by the owners. 3. The southerly driveway shall be reduced from 40-foot width to 30- foot width to provide a separation between the two driveways to comply with city design criteria. Chairman Wood opened the public hearing and asked if the applicant cared to make a presentation. MR. JAY TARANTON, 3666 Kearny Villa Rd., San Diego, concurred with staff's recommendation and requested approval. Commissioner Richards asked Mr. Taranton if they have considered offering services to shopping customers while they do their shopping; and if so, could they provide adequate parking for those cars. Mr. Taranton replied that they are offering that service and would also be providing shuttle service to those customers. Chairman Wood asked if anyone present wished to speak in FAVOR or OPPOSITION to this case; there being none, the public hearing was closed. Moved by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner Downs, to adopt findings as recommended by staff; carried 4-0-1 (Erwood abstaining). Moved by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner Downs, to adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 883 approving CUP 19-83, subject to conditions as amended; carried 4-0-1 (Erwood abstaining). E. CASE NOS. cPP l d PMW 03-83 - JAMES RODGERS, APPLICANT AND PATRICK SHEEHY, ARCHITECT Request for approval of a precise plan of design, parcel map waiver and a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact to allow a lot consolidation to permit construction of two industrial buildings in the S.I., S.P. zone located on the east side of Boardwalk at St. James Place. Mr. Joy reviewed the staff report and recommended approval. -6- l� MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER E, 1983 Chairman Wood opened the public hearing and asked if the applicant cared to make a presentation. MR. PATRICK SHEEHY, 74-215 Highway 111, was present to answer any questions the commission might have. Chairman Wood asked if anyone present wished to speak in FAVOR or OPPOSITION to this case; there being none, the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Downs asked if the fire marshal had any concerns with this project. Mr. Vogt, fire marshal, replied that he had no concerns. Moved by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner Crites, to adopt findings as recommended by staff; carried unanimously 5-0. Moved by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner Downs, to adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 884 approving PP 11-83 and PMW 03-83, subject to conditions; carried unanimously 5-0. VIII MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS A. Interpretation of Sign Ordinance relating to Theaters. Interpretation was made and agreed by commission to allow 25 sq.ft. of signage per theater. IX. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS - NONE X. COMMENTS Chairman Wood expressed his gratitude to former Commissioner Kryder and instructed staff to make a presentation at the next evening meeting. XI. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 9:52 p.m. RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary ATTEST: RALPH B. WOOD, Chairman /lr -7- NOTICE OF DETERMINATION Negative Declaration TO: (X) Office of the County Clerk ( ) Secretary for Resources County of Riverside 1416 Ninth St., Rm 1311 4050 Main Street Sacramento, CA 95814 Riverside, CA 92501 FROM: CITY OF PALM DESERT 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, CA 92260 SUBJECT: Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108 or 21152 of the Public Resources Code. Project Title/Common Name: James Rodgers, 17802 Sky Park Circle #104, Irvine 92714 Date of Project Approval: September 6, 1983 State Clearinghouse Number (if submitted): N/A Contact Person: Stan Sawa, Principal Planner Project Location: East side of Boardwalk at St. James Place Project Description: Two industrial buildings totaling 40,678 Sq.ft. This is to advise that the City of Palm Desert has made the following determinations regarding the above described project: 1. The project ( ) will, (X) will not, have a significant effect on the environment; 2. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared in connection with this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. X A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. A copy of the Negative Declaration may be examined at the above City Hall address. 3. Mitigation measures ( ) were, (X) were not, made a condition of the approval of the project. 4. A statement of Overriding Considerations ( ) was, (X) was not, adopted for this 00 project. k2 CW— 16AL& GTZINC L o1�1.1J11Pr - Signature rtle ' Date Received for Filing 4 A QL OFFICE BOX 1977, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92261 TELEPHONE(619)346-0611 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NOTICE OF ACTION Date: September 7, 1983 James Rodgers Patrick Sheehy, Architect 17802 Sky Park Circle, Ste 104 74-215 Highway 111 Irvine, CA 92714 Palm Desert, CA 92260 R PP 11-83 nd PMW 03-83 The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of September 6, 1983. Approved by Adoption of Resolution No. 884 Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the director of environmental services, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. RAMON A. DIAZ, SECRETARY PLANNING COMMISSION RAD/lcr Enclosure cc: File Coachella Valley Water District y PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 884 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PRECISE PLAN OF DESIGN TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF TWO INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS TOTALING 40,678 SQUARE FEET AND A LOT CONSOLIDATION ON THE EAST SIDE OF BOARDWALK AT ST. JAMES PLACE IN A SERVICE INDUSTRIAL ZONE 1 AND APPROVING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT. CASE NOS. PP 11-83 and PMW 03-83 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 6th day of September, 1983, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider the request of JAMES RODGERS for approval of a precise plan of design and parcel map waiver for the above mentioned project on property more particularly described as: Lots 39 and 40 of TT 13915 WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedures to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 80-8911, in that the director of environmental services has determined that the project will not have a significant adverse impact on the environment and that a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact can be approved therefore. WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said commission did find the following facts and reasons to exist to justify the granting of said precise plan of design and parcel map waiver. 1. The design of the precise plan will not substantially depreciate property values in the vicinity. 2. The precise plan will not unreasonably interfere with the use or enjoyment of property in the vicinity by the occupants thereof for lawful purposes. 3. The precise plan will not endanger the public peace, health, safety or general welfare. 4. The proposed consolidation and the resulting parcels comply with applicable requirements as to area, improvement and design, floodwater drainage control, appropriate improved public roads, sanitary disposal facilities, water supply availability, environmental protection and other requirements of this title. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the planning commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the commission in this case. 2. That approval of Precise Plan 02-83 and PMW 03-83 is hereby granted for reasons subject to the attached conditions. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert - 1 - PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 884 Planning Commission, held on this 6th day of September, 1983, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: CRITES, DOWNS, ERWOOD, RICHARDS, WOOD NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE RALPH B. WOOD, Chairman ATTEST: RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary /pa I J - 2 - PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 884 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NOS. PP 11-83 and PMW 03-83 Department of Environmental Services: 1. The development of the property shall conform substantially with exhibits on file with the department of environmental services, unless modified by the following conditions. t 2. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein in addition to all municipal ordinances including but not limited to zoning, building and health codes, as well as state and federal statutes now in force, or which may be in force at the time of development. 3. Construction of this project shall commence within one year from the date of approval unless an extension of time is granted; otherwise said approval shall become null and void and of no effect. 4. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for construction the applicant shall obtain any necessary permits and/or clearances from any necessary public agencies including but not limited to: Riverside County Department of Health Palm Desert Architectural Commission City Fire Marshal Coachella Valley Water District Evidence of said permits or clearances shall be presented to the department of building and safety at the time of issuance of a building permit for the project set forth herein. 5. Trash enclosures location and access shall be approved by Palm Desert Disposal Company prior to the issuance of building permits. 6. Wall and landscape treatment shall be so designed as to diffuse the impact of the walls and be approved by the city's architectural commission. Fire Marshal• 7. Install a water system capable of delivering 4000 GPM fire flow for a four (4) hour duration in addition to domestic or other supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement. Built-in fire protection may reduce fire flow requirements. 8. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants so that no point of any building is more than 150 feet from a fire hydrant measured along approved vehicular travel ways. A. Hydrants shall not be located closer than 25 feet to any building. B. Exterior surfaces of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. C. Curbs (if installed) shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. 9. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and three (3) copies of the water system plan to the fire marshal for review. Upon approval, one copy will be sent to the building department and the original will be returned to the developer. - 3 - c� 1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 884 Fire Marshal's Conditions (Continued): 10. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and approved by the water company with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system in Case Number PP 11-83 and PMW 03-83 is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the fire marshal". 11. Prior to delivery of combustible materials to the building site, the required water system shall be installed, operating and delivering the required flow. 12. Fire lanes must be provided with a minimum of 50 foot turning radius around buildings. 13. Trash dumpsters shall not be within 5 feet of walls, building openings or combustible. roof eave lines, unless protected by an approved automatic sprinkler system. 14. Buildings shall be protected by an approved automatic fire sprinkler system. Department of Public Works: 15. Complete grading plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the city engineer for checking and approval before any construction work is commenced. 16. Landscaping maintenance on Boardwalk shall be provided by the owners. 17. Issuance of all permits, excluding stockpile, shall be done after recordation of the necessary parcel map waiver. - 4 - J City of Palm Desert Staff Report TO: Planning Commission DATE: September 6, 1983 CASE NO: PP 11-83 and PMW 03-83 REQUEST: Approval of a precise plan, parcel map waiver and Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact to allow a lot consolidation to permit construction of two industrial buildings totaling 40,678 square feet with associated parking in the S.I., S.P. zone located on the east side of Boardwalk at St. James Place. APPLICANTS: JAMES RODGERS PATRICK SHEEHY, ARCHITECT 17802 Sky Park Circle, Ste. 104 74-215 Highway I I I Irvine, CA 92714 Palm Desert, CA 92260 I. BACKGROUND: A. DESCRIPTION OF SITE The property is a vacant 2.5 acre site in the Palm Desert Business Center zoned service industrial. The site fronts onto Boardwalk and is surrounded by smaller (.33 acre to .45 acre) industrial parcels. The site has been graded; therefore additional grading will be nominal. B. ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE NORTH: S.I./Vacant SOUTH: S.I./Vacant EAST: S.I./Vacant WEST: S.I./Vacant C. GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION: SERVICE INDUSTRIAL ff. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This is the first project submitted for the Palm Desert Business Center which is located at the southeast corner of Cook Street and Hovley Lane. The project involves the consolidation of two lots into one lot. As the attached site plan indicates, the two buildings are parallel to each other and to the street. The majority of the parking area will be located in front of the westernmost building separated from Boardwalk by a thirteen foot wide landscaped strip of property. There are additional parking spaces between the buildings and on the rear portion of the site. The site plan exceeds the minimum landscaping and setback requirements while meeting minimum parking requirements. The site is to be surrounded by a six foot masonry wall while the parking lot design will allow integration of a parking lot with an adjacent parcel. The proposed structures on the site will be single story and measure nineteen feet in height. The architecture of the structures is to be reviewed by the city's architectural commission along with the business center's architectural review process. The proposed landscape plan exceeds the requirement of one fifteen gallon tree for every five parking spaces. The lot consolidation fits into a parcel map waiver category due to the fact that no new lots are being created. - 1 - CASE NOS. PP 11-83 and PMW 03-83 SEPTEMBER 6, 1983 II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION (CONTINUED): During preliminary review of the project the architectural commission raised concern over the twenty-four foot width of the accessways to the rear of the structures. This width is similar to an accessway approved by the design review board for the building at the Cook Street Industrial Park which is completed and fully occupied at this time. Staff investigation did discover a truck parking along this accessway at that site. The site plan for this case; however, should not present these problems since designated parking spaces are shown to the rear of both buildings. III. ANALYSIS: A. FINDINGS NEEDED FOR APPROVAL OF A PARCEL MAP WAIVER: 1. The planning commission shall grant a waiver, provided that it finds that the proposed consolidation and the resulting parcels comply with applicable requirements as to area, improvement and design, floodwater drainage control, appropriate improved public roads, sanitary disposal facilities, water supply availability environmental protection and other requirements of this title. JUSTIFICATION: The consolidation into one parcel for this development will comply with all applicable requirements and will allow one integrated development. B. FINDINGS NEEDED FOR APPROVAL OF THE PRECISE PLAN: 1. The design of the precise plan will not substantially depreciate property values in the vicinity. Justification: The design will utilize the entire 2.5 acre site assuring a well planned totally integrated development. In the design, care has been taken to screen from view service and equipment storage areas. While the development is an industrial facility, care has been taken to assure that its planning and design are well integrated and aesthetically acceptable. 2. The precise plan will not unreasonably interfere with the use or enjoyment of property in the vicinity of the occupants thereof for lawful purposes. Justification: The development is located in an industrial park and the use proposed is compatible with any potential uses in the area. The design of the facility with limited access points and service areas in the center of the project, assure that adjacent property can be used for the purposes they have been zoned. 3. The precise plan will not endanger the public peace, health, safety or general welfare. Justification: The plan meets or exceeds all code requirements and care has been taken in its design to assure that during its operation the facility will not impact surrounding areas. - 2 - CASE NOS. PP 11-83 and PMW 03-83 SEPTEMBER 6, 1983 C. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The director of environmental services has determined that the proposed project will not have a significant adverse impact on the environment and that a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact should be approved as meeting the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended. IV. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the following: 1. Approval of findings. 2. Approval of Planning Commission Resolution No. , approving PMW 03-83 and PP 11-83 as conditioned. "A resolution of the planning commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, approving a precise plan of design to allow the construction of two industrial buildings, totaling 40,678 square feet and a lot consolidation and approving a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact therefore." V. ATTACHMENTS: A. Resolution B. Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact C. Precise Plan and Elevations Prepared by: Reviewed and approved by: , '' it-, /pa - 3 - PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PRECISE PLAN OF DESIGN TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF TWO INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS TOTALING 40,678 SQUARE FEET AND A LOT CONSOLIDATION ON THE EAST SIDE OF BOARDWALK AT ST. JAMES PLACE IN A SERVICE INDUSTRIAL ZONE AND APPROVING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT. CASE NOS. PP 11-83 and PMW 03-83 WHEREAS, the planning commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 6th day of September, 1983, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider the request of JAMES RODGERS for approval of a precise plan of design and parcel map waiver for the above mentioned project on property more particularly described as: t Lots 39 and 40 of TT 13915 WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements'of the "City of Palm Desert Procedures to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 80-89", in that the director of environmental services has determined that the project will not have a significant adverse impact on the environment and that a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact can be approved therefore. WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said commission did find the following facts and reasons to exist to justify the granting of said precise plan of design and parcel map waiver. 1. The design of the precise plan will not substantially depreciate property values in the vicinity. 2. The precise plan will not unreasonably interfere with the use or enjoyment of property in the vicinity by the occupants thereof for lawful purposes. 3. The precise plan will not endanger the public peace, health, safety or general welfare. 4. The proposed consolidation and the resulting parcels comply with applicable requirements as to area, improvement and design, floodwater drainage control, appropriate improved public roads, sanitary disposal facilities, water supply availability, environmental protection and other requirements of this title. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the planning commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the commission in this case. 2. That approval of Precise Plan 02-83 and PMW 03-83 is hereby granted for reasons subject to the attached conditions. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert - 1 - PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. Planning Commission, held on this 6th day of September, 1983, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RALPH B. WOOD, Chairman ATTEST: RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretart RAD/pa - 2 - PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NOS. PP 11-83 and PMW 03-83 Department of Environmental Services: 1. The development of the property shall conform substantially with exhibits on file with the department of environmental services, unless modified by the following conditions. 2. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein in addition to all municipal ordinances including but not limited to zoning, building and health codes, as well as state and federal statutes now in force, or which may be in force at the time of development. 3. Construction of this project shall commence within one year from the date of approval unless an extension of time is granted; otherwise said approval shall become null and void and of no effect. 4. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for construction the applicant shall obtain any necessary permits and/or clearances from any necessary public agencies including but not limited to: Riverside County Department of Health Palm Desert Architectural Commission City Fire Marshal Coachella Valley Water District Evidence of said permits or clearances shall be presented to the department of building and safety at the time of issuance of a building permit for the project set forth herein. 5. Trash enclosures location and access shall be approved by Palm Desert Disposal Company prior to the issuance of building permits. 6. Wall and landscape treatment shall be so designed as to diffuse the impact of the walls and be approved by the city's architectural commission. Fire Marshal: 7. Install a water system capable of delivering 4000 GPM fire flow for a four (4) hour duration in addition to domestic or other supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement. Built-in fire protection may reduce fire flow requirements. 8. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants so that no point of any building is more than 150 feet from a fire hydrant measured along approved vehicular travel ways. A. Hydrants shall not be located closer than 25 feet to any building. B. Exterior surfaces of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. C. Curbs (if installed) shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. 9. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer_ shall furnish the original and three (3) copies of the water system plan to the fire marshal for review. Upon approval, one copy will be sent to the building department and the original will be returned to the developer. - 3 - PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. Fire Marshal's Conditions (Continued): 10. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and approved by the water company with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system in Case Number PP 11-83 and PMW 03-83 is in accordance with the . requirements prescribed by the fire marshal". 11. Prior to delivery of combustible materials to the building site, the required water system shall be installed, operating and delivering the required flow. 12. Fire lanes must be provided with a minimum of 50 foot turning radius around buildings. 13. Trash dumpsters shall not be within 5 feet of walls, building openings or combustible roof eave lines, unless protected by an approved automatic sprinkler system. 14. Buildings shall be protected by an approved automatic fire sprinkler system. Department of Public Works: 15. Complete grading plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the city engineer for checking and approval before any construction work is commenced. 16. Landscaping maintenance on Boardwalk shall be provided by the owners. 17. Issuance of all permits, excluding stockpile, shall be done after recordation of the necessary parcel map waiver. - 4 - ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES AUGUST 9, 1983 B. Preliminary Plans: 1. CASE NO: 191 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): JAMES E. RODGERS, 17802 Sky Park Circle, Ste. 104, Irvine, CA 92714 and PATRICK A. SHEEHY, ARCHITECT, 74-215 Highway 111, Palm Desert, CA 92260. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of plans to construct two 2 multitenant industrial buildings. LOCATION: East side of Boardwalk Street opposite end of St. James Place Cook Street Business Center). ZONE: S.I., S.P. Mr. Smith stated that this application was a request for preliminary approval of two multitenant industrial buildings in the Cook Street Business Center, both buildings would have the same elevations. A precise plan application will be undergoing review by the planning commission at which time the parking, circulation and other matters will be reviewed. The commissioners indicated the building was acceptable aesthetically and found no problem with the elevations but felt that the planning commission should be apprised of their concerns regarding parking and circulation for the building. They recommended that the driveway between the buildings be set back from the rear of the front building and adequate protection should be installed to protect the buildings from cars and trucks parking and backing into the spaces. Other concerns were that there was not not enough room for trucks to unload and load without creating a circulation problem and that the plans should be changed to reflect the grade change at the rear of the building. A representative of Patrick A. Sheehy Architects indicated that the parking lot layout was no different from the parking lots of other buildings on Joni Drive. Tenants requiring loading and unloading of trucks will be assigned to the units in the rear of the building where more loading space is provided. Commissioner Cook stated that the buildings on Joni Drive were in the County. He was skeptical that the uses in the front building would not require loading and unloading from the driveway. Commissioner Cook asked if a study had been made to see if the access areas could be in a central court. The representative replied that if they had a central court, they would have ingress and egress problems. On a motion by Commissioner Cook, seconded by Commissioner Martin, preliminary approval was granted subject to staff apprising the planning commission of the commission's concerns at the time of precise plan submission and the following two conditions as listed in the staff report: 1. Construction plans shall be submitted for approval to the city fire marshal prior to issuance of building permits. All conditions shall be made a part of construction and no certificate of occupancy shall be issued until completed. d - 2 - CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE PP 11-33, PMW 03-83 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by JAMES RODGERS for approval of a precise plan of design, parcel map waiver and Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact to allow a lot consolidation to permit construction of two industrial buildings totaling 40,678 square feet with associated parking located on a 2.5 acre site in a service industrial zone on the east side of Boardwalk at St. James Place, more particularly described as: A.P.N. 632-060-018 and 632-060-019 VE^DO_♦ i{ETA X YAJ I • \\ /i'lOBO RIO \ I 110 _/ /Wqh i / ♦♦i/ I I `` / /cC'♦! VIA UMAj , I -, 1 /},/ \�\ VIA�EOJ 1 LANE v PROJECT Y I�\\`\ ,��/ �Y \ \gyp ♦ \ I I SITE0 St JAMES RL > `�\ \ B / ( �o • . T V (;/ A M DI FIR EA i wn-w COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE • uArnlR DRIVE e • e VEL1E WAY w Q J V AT Z 4 e r W � Q Q 5700 LANE J OXI DRIVE I I O SAID public hearing will be held on September 6, 1983, at 7:00 p.m. in the council chambers in the Palm Desert City Hall, 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. Ramon Diaz, Secretary Palm Desert Planning Commission PUBLISH: Desert Post August 26, 1983 t SCUTHERN CALIFCPNIA 'j 9QS i COMPANY 3700 CENTRAL AVENUE • RIVERSIDE. CALIFORNIA R. W. RIDDELL Esstem Division Meiling Address: P.0. BOX 2200, RIVERSIDE. CALIFORNIA 92510 Distribution Planning Supervisor July 22, 1983 Location of Nearest Gas Main: In Cook St. , within subject area. City of Palm Desert P. 0. Box 1977 Palm Desert, CA 92261 Gentlemen: Re: PP 11-83 and PMW 03-83 This letter is not to be interpreted as a contractual commitment to serve the proposed project; but only as an information service. Its intent is to notify you that the Southern California Gas Company has facilities in the area where the above named project is proposed. Gas service to the project could be pro- vided from an existing main without any significant impact on the environment. The service would be in accordance with the Company's policies and extension rules on file with the California Public Utilities Commission at the time con- tractual arrangements are made. The availability of natural gas service, as set forth in this letter, is based upon present conditions of gas supply and regulatory policies. As a public utility, the Southern California Gas Company is under the jurisdiction of the California Public Utilities Commission. We can also be affected by actions of federal regulatory agencies. Should these agencies take any action which affects gas supply or the condition under which service is available, gas ser- vice will be provided in accordance with revised conditions. We have developed several programs which are available, upon request, to provide assistance in selecting the most effective applications of energy conservation techniques for a particular project. If you desire further information on any of our energy conservation programs, please contact our Area Market Services Manager, P. O. Box 6226, San Bernardino, CA 92417, phone (714) 884-9411. lap- R.R. W. Riddel CR:ds i,L SE-'diCES ESTABLISHED IN 1918 AS A PUBLIC AGENCY COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT POST OFFICE BOX 1058 • COACHELLA, CALIFORNIA 92236 • T=_LEPHONE5 1 398-2651 (619) DIRECTORS OFFICERS RAYMOND R.SUMMON DS,PRESIDENT LOWELL 0.WEEKS,GENERAL MANAGER-CHIEF ENGINEER TELLIS COOEKAS,VICE PRESIDENT BERNARDINE SUTTON.SECRETARY JOHN P.POW ELL VICTOR B.HARDY,AUDITOR PAUL W.NICHOLS REDWINE AND SHERRILL,ATTORNEYS STEVE D.BUXTON July 27, 1983 File: 0163. 11 0421. 1 0721. 1 Department of Environmental Services ',- _.. City of Palm Desert Post Office Box 1977 Palm Desert, California 92261 Gentlemen: Subject: PP 11-83 and PMW 03-83 Portion of Southwest quarter, Section 10, Township 5 South, Range 6 East San Bernardino Meridian This area lies on the sandy area in the northern portion of Palm Desert and is considered safe from stormwater flows except in rare instances. The District will furnish domestic water and sanitation service to this area in accordance with the current regulations of this District. There may be conflicts with existing District facilities. We request the appropriate public agency to withhold the issuance of a building permit until arrangements have been made with the District for the relocation of these facilities. Yours very truly, Lowell 0. Weeks General Manager-Chief Engineer CS:ra cc: Riverside County Department of Public Health, Indio TRUE CONSERVATION USE WATER WISELY I � r July 21, S9i RANCHO MIRAGE FIRE STATIC i 0fQ,.W 70-800 Highway 111 Rancho Mirage, CA 92Z7t, Ramon A. Diaz - �"" Director of Environmental Services 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, CA 92260 Reference: Case No. PP 11-83 and PMW 03-83 Applicant - James Rodgero, Boardwalk and St. James Place Dear Mr. Diaz: Prior to construction of any of the proposed buildings, the following conditions must be met: 1. Install a water system capable of delivering 4000 GPM fire flow for a four (4) hour duration in addition to domestic or other supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement. Built-in fire protection may reduce fire flow requirements. 2. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants so that no point of any building is more than 150 feet from a fire hydrant measured along approved vehicular travel ways. A. Hydrants shall not be located closer than 25 feet to any building. B. Exterior surfaces of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow, and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. C. Curbs (if installed) shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. 3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and three (3) copies of the water system plan to the Fire Marshal for review. Upon approval, one copy will be sent to the Building Department, and the original will be returned to the developer. 4. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer, and approved by the water company, with the following certification: " I certify that the design of the water system in Case Number PP 11-83 and PMW 03-83 is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Fire Marshal." 5. Prior to delivery of combustible materials to the building site, the required water system shall be installed, operating and delivering the required flow. July 21, , — RANCHO MIRAGE FIRE STATIC' 70.800 Highway ill - ' Rancho Mirage, CA 92= Ramon A. Diaz Director of Environmental Services 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, CA 92260 Reference: Case No. PP 11-83 and PMW 03-83 Applicant - James Rodgero, Boardwalk and St. James Place Dear Mr. Diaz: Prior to construction of any of the proposed buildings, the following conditions must be met: 1. Install a water system capable of delivering 4000 GPM fire flow for a four (4) hour duration in addition to domestic or other supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement. Built-in fire protection may reduce fire flow requirements. ts so t no oint of ny 2 issmore thanr150e feet nfrom uae fire rhydrant nmeasured aalong papproved avehi ng cular travel ways. A. Hydrants shall not be located closer than 25 feet to any building. B. Exterior surfaces of hydrant barrels and heads shall b painted chrome yellow, and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted C. Curbs (if installed) shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. 3, prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and three (3) copies of the water system plan to the Fire Deprshal t, for review. Upon approval, one copy will be sent to the Building artme and the original will be returned to the developer. 4. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer, and approved by the water company, with the following certification: " I certify that the design of the water system in Case Number PP 11-83 and PMW 03-83 is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Fire Marshal." 5. Prior to delivery of combustible materials to the building site, the required water system shall be installed, operating and delivering the required flow. Ramon A. Diaz 7/21/83 Dir. of Environmental Serv. Page 2. Ref: Case No. PP 11-83 and PMW 03-83 Applicant - James Rodgero, Boardwalk & St. James P1. 6. Fire lanes must be provided with a minimum of 50 foot turning radius around buildings. 7. Trash dumpsters shall not be within 5 feet of walls, building openings or combustible roof eave lines, unless protected by an approved automatic sprinkler system. 8. Buildings shall be protected by an approved automatic fire sprinkler system. Sincerely, DAVID L. FLAKE County Fire C ief Eric L. Vo Fire Mars to cc: Jim Zimmerman CVWD 46-M PRICXL7 PEAR LANE, PALM OESE.n CAUFORNIA 92260 TELEPMCNE (714) 346-0e11 DEPAZM?r OF BU=ING & SAFETY PREL.Tr1IlVPAY SEzT 4 OF PLANS SffiS IS Mr A PLAN Cc1ECZI DEVELOP:'=: PP 11-83 8 PMW 03-83 Boandiva,P-k Indu6tt at Zone Remove ptcpvtu Z-ne in cent2t, an. pn-ovide -requited 5.lnewaU pnctection. BEFORE ANY F=M CQ-S'M= CAN BE FADE, ADDITIONAL IrIFTJRh'A= IS t� FaFt RE�IZFSJ. . . vQ CCb1Pl.:M ARGi JRAI. DRAFTIl4G5 AM SPF.�L IC?.T iS ® COMPLELE =''CZTRAL DRAWING ACID CAILZ4a2 IS =,IFr F'T'r' H.V.A.C. , r r ZC=CAL AND FL:Pe= FLANS & SPSCZFIC?.TZONS j� r Frf =z 24 =a c .A=N LCCII`eTLA= 0 C3A2 = GAME PLANS C= Hand tcapp ,tequ,J ement ,6 / Ju,2u 19, 1983 JOE AI C41�iRJ, SR. ATE DI. CIOR OF BUILDING & SAFETY CASE Y0. EfT9'IR0PTtiE:TT�I. SEAV I CES DEPT. IYITIAL STQ"1i Y EYi PIE0`73LE AL EVALTTATICIT C=CZLIST NOTE: The availability of data necessary to address the topics listed below shall form the basis of a decision as to whether the application is considered complete for purposes of environmental assessment. ENVIR01VENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and 'maybe" answers , possible mitigation measures and comments are provided on attached sheets) . Yes Maybe No 1 . Earth. Will the proposal result in: , a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic. substructures? b. Oisruptions, displacements , compaction, or overcovering of the sail? c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? d. The destruction, covering, or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? JG e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? v 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? _ Ii b. The creation of objectionable odors? c. Alteration of air movement, moisture , or temperature, or any change in climate, / either locally or regionally? Yes Maybe INC 3. Water, dill the proposal result in: a... Changes. in currents , "or the course or 1 ` direction of water' movements? v "` . b. Changes in-abscratIOn r`at_s , drainage patterns, or the rate and- amount ct surface water runoff? C. Altc w to to the Course or flow of — — floodd waters? d. Alteration of.the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? e. Change in the quantity of ground wat_rs, 1 either- through direct additions or with- drawals, or through inta:-action of an / aquifer by cuts or excavations? (/ f. Reduction in the amount of water other- i wise available for public water supplies? 4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of plants (including trees , shrubs , grass , and Craps )? /. b. Reduc:'cn of the nLarzters of any unique, rare, or endangered species of plants? c. Introduction of new species of plants into —L! an area , or in a barrier to the normal / replenishment of existing species? v 5. Animal. life. ,dill the proposal result in: a. Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds , land animals including reptiles , or / insects)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, / rare, or endangered species of animals? _ C. Introduction of new species of animals Into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movenent of animals? d. Oeter'aration to exis`?ng vildlife hab ha+? t 3. Yes Mt be Plc S. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in -the rate of use of any natural / resources? _ v b. repletion of any non-renewable natural — — resource? 7. Enercy. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? b. Oemand upon existing sources of energy, or re- quire the.deselopment of new sources of — energy? 8. Risk of Uoset. - Odes the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous subs~a noes (including, but not limited to, pesticides , ail , chemicals, or radiation) in / the event of an accident or upset conditions? —{,�/ 9. E^onorri c Loss. Will the proposal result in: a. A change in the value of property and improvements endangered by flooding? b. A change in the value of property and improvements exposed to geologic hazards / beyond accepted C=munity risk standards? 10. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels to the point at which ac-zpted community eed noise and vibration levels are ex — — exceeded? (� 11. Land Use. Will -the proposal result in the alteration of the present developed ar / planned land use of an area? _ (/ 12. Ocen Soace. Will the proposal lead to a decrease in the amount of designated open space? 12. Population. Will the proposal result in: a. Alteration or the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human / population or the city? _ v b. Change in the population distribution by age, income, religion, racial , or ethnic group, occupational class , household type? 4. Yes Maybe No 14. Employment. Will the proposal result in additiona new long-term jobs provided, or a / change in the number and per cant employed, unemployed, and underemployed? IS. Housing. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in number and per cant of housing units by type (price or rent range, zoning category, owner-occupied and rental , etc. ) relative to demand or to number of families in various income classes in the City? b. Impacts on existing housing or creation of a demand for additional housing? 16. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: / a. Generation of additional vehicular movement? !/ b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? c. Impact upon existing transportation systems? _ (� d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation (/or movement of people and/or goods? _ e. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , — Y bicyclists , or pedestrians? 17. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon , or resu 7 in a need for, new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? b. Police protection? c. Schools? d. Parks or other recreational facilities? !/ e. Maintenance of public facilities , including roads? f. Other governmental seraicas? Yes Maybe No 18. Public Fiscal Balance. Will the proposal result in a net change in government fiscal flow (revenues less operating expenditures and annualized capital expenditures)? _ 19. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? b. Communications system? c. Water? d. Sever or septic tanks? (� e. Storm water drainage? v f. Solid waste and disposal? 20. Human Health. Will the proposal result in: a. The creation of any health hazard or Potential health hazard? v b. A change in the level of community health care provided? L� 21. Social Services. Will the proposal result in an increased demand for provision of general social services? 22. Aesthetics . Will the proposal result in: a. Obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public? b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? c. Lessening of the overall neighborhood (or area ) attractiveness, pleasantness , and uniqueness? v 22. Licht and Glaris. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? 24. Archealoaical/Historical . Will the proposal resu t in an aitaration . of a significant archeological historical site, structure, — — Object, or building? ing' (� 6. Yes Maybe No 25. Mandatory Findinas of Sionificance. a. Oces the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment or to curtail the diversity in the environment b. Oces the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into ; v the future. ) c. Oces the project have impacts which are indi- vidually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small , but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment � ! is significant. ) d. Oces the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects / on human beings , either directly or indirectly? Initial Study Prepared By: y�L v Y f1 Sf7 iFC�ni.✓ET2 fA4A4 DESE7zT Ramon A. Diaz 7/21/83 Dir. of Environmental Serv. Page 2. Ref: Case No. PP 11-83 and PMW 03-83 Applicant - James Rodgero, Boardwalk & St. James P1. 6. Fire lanes must be provided with a minimum of 50 foot turning radius around buildings. 7. Trash dumpsters shall not be within 5 feet of walls, building openings or combustible roof eave lines, unless protected by an approved automatic sprinkler system. 8. Buildings shall be protected by an approved automatic fire sprinkler system. Sincerely, DAVID L. FLAKE County Fire C ief etz'- Eric L. Vo Fire Mars to cc: Jim Zimmerman CVWD 4a-273 PRICXLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CAUFORNIA 92260 TELEPMCNE (714) 346-0611 =A=TL OF BL=rM FIraZZMARY RHV 4 OF PLANTS IIiLS IS WP A PLANT CEM rEVE .CP."-=: PP 11-83 6 PM 03-83 Soc tdiva k IndwSzti.aP Zone Remove pnopu to 2,ine in center, oa pnovide n.equ,i ,ed 5.t ewa,82 p totect i.on. MIME ANY Fm= "*7I5 CAN BE MADE, AIM=- VAL Il`TFC WA= I5 t FAR REZIgIl. . . Q ( 17= AFZEI=C7JRAL MAW= AMID SPEC x CAZ"rCNS rMvrx-rF 5^u 1t'TCTRAL MAWZ.M AND CaCIII2.T IS ® =SP= H.V.A.C. , FS FZMMAT AND FLLT"B= FLANS & SMCgTGATI= OCt-vLEg == 24 mzpm Q=r VA=N Ma2A.E*TrATZC T [= tC342= GBADIM FLANS Q Qg { Handi.capp n.equ,i,tement,5 i / JwZu 19, 1983 JOE AI Q�TO, SR. ➢AT" DI. CTOR OF BUILDING & SAFETY I PROOF OF PUBLICATION (20109 2015.5 CCP) PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF LEGAL NOTICE PP 11 -83 I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years# and not CITY OF PALM DESERT a party to or interested in the LEGAL NOTICE CASE NO. PP 11-83, PMW 03- above entitled matter. I alit the 93 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIV- ENprincipal clerk of the printer beheld hearing will be held before the Palm De- of THE DESERT POSTS sert Planning commission to consider a request by JAMES a newspaper of general clrcula- RODGERS for approval of a precise.plah of design, parcel t.ions printed and published weeks map Walserr and Negative y Declaraf[on Of Environmental in the city of Riversidet County Imp ap-roauowalotaonsou- datiod to permit construction of Riverside) and which newspaper of two industrial buildings to- has been adjudged a newspaper of toling 40,678 square feet with general circulation by the associated parking located on °2.5 acre site in a service in- Superior Court of the Countyof dustribl zone on the east side Of Boardwalk at St. James Riverside, Stale of Cali#orniap Place,scribedmore particulary do- M: under date of October 59 19649 A.P.N. 632-06 i8 and 632-060- Case number 83658; that the held o Pubplicherrngwil °bet notices of which the annexed is 7:00 P.M. in the council cham- ber in�Ybe Palm Desert City Hall, 45-275 Prickly Pear a printed copys has been published Lane, Palm Desert, Califor- nio, at which time and place in each regular and entire issue all interested persons are in- J of said newspaper and not in an vl'�tO Ottentl and be y Raman Diaz supplement thereof on the followingPalm Desert Planning Commission da tes s to-wit : PDP-8/26 08126 91983 T Certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated August 269 1983 at Riversides California ----- ----- _� � --------- CITY OF PALM DESERT CG P eS u CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE PP 11-83, PMW 03-83 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by JAMES RODGERS for approval of a precise plan of design, parcel map waiver and Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact to allow a lot consolidation to permit construction of two industrial buildings totaling 40,678 square feet with associated parking located on a 2.5 acre site in a service industrial zone on the east side of Boardwalk at St. James Place, more particularly described as: A.P.N. 632-060-018 and 632-060-019 _ w V j^DO_ `IOTA NAYA j C(Z i I p'\,\ VIA L`MAJ 1 % `fit VIA LEONI I \ I � LANE PROJECT SITE i s p\`v� ..;♦ 1.\B� r ga�y r 01 n I MEDI ERR EA 0�P \;Z'9 • 42-w-w E COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE - MAY FAIR DRIVE > VELIE WAY a •_ 3 � y A y • Ari ti a • W '^ a • SE00 LANE • J ONI DflIVE I I • SAID public hearing will be held on September 6, 1983, at 7:00 p.m. in the council chambers in the Palm Desert City Hall, 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. Ramon Diaz, Secretary Palm Desert Planning Commission PUBLISH: Desert Post August 26, 1983 INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM City of Palm Desert � `=''� ) '�*� AUG 2 g 1983 TO: Department of Environmental Services ENVIRONiVILWAL SERVICES FROM: Director of Public Works CITY OF PALM DESLRT SUBJECT: PP 11-83 AND PMW 03-83 - JAMES RODGERS DATE:August 26, 1983 The following should be considered as conditions of approval : (1) Complete grading plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the City Engineer for checking and approval before any construc- tion work is commenced. (2) Landscaping maintenance on Boardwalk shall be provided by the owners. (3) Issuance of all permits, excluding stockpile, shall be done after recordation of the necessary parcel map waiver. 7YCC LELLIIN, P.E. BDM/ms e DEPARTMENT OF FIRE PROTECTION �^y IN COOPERATION WITH THE UNTY �' CALIFORNIA DIVISION OF FORESTRY I CO RlVERSlDEr.i., DAVID L. FLAKE P.O. BOX 248 COUNTY FIRE WARDEN 210 WEST SAN JACINTO STREET July 21, Q��9 y' PERRIS, CALIFORNIA 92370 TELEPHONE (714) 657-3183 RANCHO MIRAGE FIRE STATION JU L 2 2 �983 70.800 Highway 111 Rancho Mirage, CA 92z70, Ramon A. Diaz ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CITY OF PALM DE Director of Environmental Services 5ERT 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, CA 92260 Reference: Case No. PP 11-83 and PMW 03-83 Applicant - James Rodgero, Boardwalk and St. James Place Dear Mr. Diaz: Prior to construction of any of the proposed buildings, the following conditions must be met: 1. Install a water system capable of delivering 4000 GPM fire flow for a four (4) hour duration in addition to domestic or other supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement. Built-in fire protection may reduce fire flow requirements. 2. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants so that no point of any building is more than 150 feet from a fire hydrant measured along approved vehicular travel ways. -Zoo A. Hydrants shall not be located closer than]5�feet to any building. B. Exterior surfaces of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow, and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. C. Curbs (if installed) shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. 3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and three (3) copies of the water system plan to the Fire Marshal for review. Upon approval, one copy will be sent to the Building Department, and the original will be returned to the developer. 4. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer, and approved by the water company, with the following certification: " I certify that the design of the water system in Case Number PP 11-83 and PMW 03-83 is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Fire Marshal." 5. Prior to delivery of combustible materials to the building site, the required water system shall be installed, operating and delivering the required flow. Ramon A. Diaz 7/21/83 Dir. of Environmental Serv. Page 2. Ref: Case No. PP 11-83 and PMW 03-83 Applicant - James Rodgero, Boardwalk & St. James Pl. 6. Fire lanes muster be provided with a minimum of 50 foot turning radius around buildings. 7. Trash dumpsters shall not be within 5 feet of walls, building openings or combustible roof eave lines, unless protected by an approved automatic sprinkler system. 8. Buildings shall be protected by an approved automatic fire sprinkler system. Sincerely, DAVID L. FLAKE. County Fire C ief Cy /w 'l Eric L. Vo Fire Mars to cc: Jim Zimmerman CVWD J Southern California Edison Company . _. 36-I00 CATHEDRAL CANYON DRIVE CA'I IEDRAL CITY, CALIFORNIA 92234IMF) V�� VV August 2, 1983 AUG - 4 1983 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CITY OF PALM DESERT To : City of Palm Desert Subject : PP 11-83 and PW 03-83 - j. Rodgers(Project Name) Environmental Impact Report Gentlemen: This is to advise that the subject property is located within the service territory of the Southern California Edison Company and that the electric loads of the project are within parameters of projected load growth which Edison is planning to meet in this area. Unless the demand for electrical generating capacity exceeds our estimates, and provided that there are no unexpected outages to major sources of electrical supply , we expect to meet our electri- cal requirements for the next several years. Our total system demand is expected to continue to increase annually; however, excluding . any unforeseen problems , our plans for new generation resources indicate that our ability to serve all customer loads during peak demand periods will be adequate during the decade of the 80 ' s . Current conservation efforts on the part of Edison 's customers has resulted in energy savings . Optimization of conservation measures in this project will contribute to the overall energy savings goal. Very ttruly yours, W. R. Leonesio Customer Service Planner WRL:slt 11 � SCUTHEIRN ALIMYRNIA gas ; COMPANY 3700 CENTRAL AVENUE s RIVERSIDE. CALIFORNIA R. W. RIDDELL Eastern Division Meiling Address: P.O. BOX 2200, RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92516 Distribution Planning Supervisor July 22, 1983 Location of Nearest Gas Main: In Cook St. , within subject area. City of Palm Desert . P. O. Box 1977 Palm Desert, CA 92261 Gentlemen: - - Re: PP 11-83 and PMW 03-83 This letter is not to be interpreted as a contractual commitment to serve the proposed project; but only as an information service. Its intent is to notify you that the Southern California. Gas Company has facilities in the area where the above named project is proposed. Gas service to the project could be pro- vided from an existing main without any significant impact on the environment. The service would be in accordance with the Company's policies and extension rules on file with the California Public Utilities Commission at the time con- tractual arrangements are made. The availability of natural gas service, as set forth in this letter, is based upon present conditions of gas supply and regulatory policies. As a public utility, the Southern California- Gas Company is under the jurisdiction of the California Public Utilities Commission. We can also be affected by actions of federal regulatory agencies. Should these agencies take any action which affects gas supply or the condition under which service is available, gas ser- vice will be provided in accordance with revised conditions. We have developed several programs which are available, upon request, to provide assistance in selecting the most effective applications of energy conservation techniques for a particular project. If you desire further information on any of our energy conservation programs, please contact our Area Market Services Manager, P. O. Box 6226, San Bernardino, CA 92417, phone (714) 884-9411. JUL2 ,g 1083 R. W. Riddel CR:ds EyV'FCN': D`,AL SER':'ICES e 00 I 11 7 5 z ESTABLISHED IN 1918 AS A PUBLIC AGENCY COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT POST OFFICE BOX 1058 • COACHELLA, CALIFORNIA 92236 • TELEPHONE*A4) 398-2651 (619), DIRECTORS OFFICERS RAYMOND R.RUMMONDS,PRESIDENT LOWELLO.WEEKS,GENERAL MANAGER-CHIEF ENGINEER TELLIS CODEKAS,VICE PRESIDENT BERNARDINE SUTTON,SECRETARY JOHN P.POWELL VICTOR B.HARDY,AUDITOR PAUL W.NICHOLS REDWINE AND SHERRILL,ATTORNEYS STEVE D.BUXTON July 27, 1983 File: 0163. 11 Z1" 0421. 1 0721. 1 AUG - ]. 1983 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Department of Environmental ServiegsOF PALM DESERT City of Palm Desert Post Office Box 1977 Palm Desert, California 92261 Gentlemen: Subject: PP 11-83 and PMW 03-83 Portion of Southwest quarter, Section 10, Township 5 South, Range 6 East San Bernardino Meridian This area lies on the sandy area in the northern portion of Palm Desert and is considered safe from stormwater flows except in rare instances. The District will furnish domestic water and sanitation service to this area in accordance with the current regulations of this District. There may be conflicts with existing District facilities. We request the appropriate public agency to withhold the issuance of a building permit until arrangements have been made with the District for the relocation of these facilities. Yours very truly, Lowell 0. Weeks General Manager-Chief Engineer CS:ra cc: Riverside County Department of Public Health, Indio TRUE CONSERVATION USE WATER WISELY 45-V5 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (7I4) 346-0611 DEPAR'IlIENT OF BUILDING & SAFETY PRELUC MRY'REVIEW OF PLANS MLS IS NOT A PLAN C'HiCKI LEVELMM PP 17-83 9 MAW 03-83 Bocycdwat Indu,6t)L a2 Zone COtTgPTlS Remove phopenty Z.ine in centeA, on pnovide hequ,iced �. ewaU ptotecti.on. :ANY' FUMM CMMMM- CAN BE MADE, ADDITIONAL II MW= IS t� FOR REV q. . . Q, COWL= ARCIIiTFLT]M UWUNGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ® CMIFZE STRUCIU:VL DRAWINGS AND CAL01LATMIS ® (XN= H.V.A.C. , FI F1 MIC AL AND PLUMBING PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS CCVI= TITLE 24 f1MM CONSMATION DOCCT7EtMA1ZON Q; COMPLhZ'E GRADING PLANS © a= HandZcapp AequiAements / r July 19, 1983 JOE ALOMINO, SR. DATE, DI CTOR OF BUILDING & SAFETY POST OFFICE BOX 1977, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92261 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO: PP 11-83 and PMW 03-83 APPLICANT:JAMES RODGERS Enclosed please find materials describing a project for which the following is being requested: Approval of a precise plan of design, parcel map waiver and negative declaration of environmental impact to allow a lot consolidation to permit construction of two industrial buildings totaling 40,678 square feet with associated parking located on a 2.5 acre site in a service industrial zone on on the east side of Boardwalk at St. James Place, more particularly described as: A.P.N'S. 632-060-018 and 632-060-01.9 The attached data was prepared by the applicant and is being forwarded to you for comments and recommended conditions of approval. The city is interested in the probable impacts on the natural environment (e.g. water and air pollution), public resources (e.g. demand for schools, hospitals, parks, power generation, sewage treatment, etc.) and site and building plan acceptability. ,Your comments and recommended conditions of approval must be received by this office prior to 4:30 p.m. August 1, 1983, in order to be discussed by the land division committee at their meeting. The land division committee (comprised of director of environmental services, city building official, city engineer, fire marshal and a representative of CVWD) will discuss the comments and recommended conditions of approval and will forward them to the planning commission through the staff report. Any information received by this office after the receipt deadline will not be discussed by the land division committee nor will it be forwarded to the planning commission for consideration. Sincerely, Ramon A. Diaz Director of Environmental Services RAD/pa PLEASE RETURN MAP WITH COMMENTS io (— w � YrI � 1 •' ~ 1 � ( ' N Imo ' ajA 'tea i se..9tcRi _V _ .e Z— < i F' i ti 'f k i-- Palm Desert Business Center Palm Desert, California, County of Riverside TRACT #13,915 r LOT AREAS 1. 101,427 21. 24,905 2. 102,481 22. 21,185 3. 77,343 23. 24,081 - . 1 27 26 2s a �/ 4. 77,390 24. 24,653 k24 5:' 16,875- 25. 24,653 0 1II 23 6. 14,790 26. 24,653 `\ 22 o� ti 7. 14,500 27. 26,216 M , , 29 Y128 8. 14,500 28. 20,315 .9. 14,500 29. 20,498 ` q \31 \� m20 \' ,4 10. 14,500 30-20,904 040I� .4. ° �� 11. 21,500 31. 24,276 L ST.JAMESK. ! a 18 15 12. 17,486 32. 21,047 - - FLotAz 13. 18,674 33. 20,278 14 14. 23,788 34. 20,532 33 n e 15. 54,550 35. 14,930 m� g `Lrx A l - xm 9 O 13� r/ 01 i<�'-� 'm 'm " �1' ,o ,% \ 16. 25,546 36. 14,500 � x,n ; �--FIG � •`.�-�- - 's � 12 S\ 17. 22,323 37. 14,500 i a I ,m ;D /, MEmMSSA°�° _L _ :' 18. 22,116 38. 14,422 ,m y 19. 21,156 39. 53,588 7 ? e n'e 7 io 20. - 53,753 40: 56,842 i 0 �4 Bob Orr Ed Mark (714) 830-8600 INDUSTRIAL WEST, INC. (619) 568-6944 FULLY IMPROVED LOTS FOR SALE Industrial /Office N PALM DESERT BUSINESS CENTER Cook Street, Palm Desert, California { • Lot Sizes - 1/3 acre and UP j • Zoning — Service Industrial/Office • Central Location — Excellent Access .TG IGSgNGE4 SS C Nr O= RAMON R0. Site Location a U 2 / a p y'1'T a a o = F�STgTF'O a p o qN Y FRANK SINATRA DR. m HIGHWAY 111 _ PALM - COUNTRY CLUB DR. SPRINGS W a = CATHEDRAL CITY Q N = RANCHO = o a a _. MIRAGE ° ; PALM FRED WARING DR. BERMUDA DUNES DESERT �a J HIGHWAY 111 P N Gad INDIO INDIAN LA QUINTA WELLS INDUSTRIAL WEST, INC. Bob Orr Ed Mark (714) 830-8600 (619) 568-6944 23030 Lake Forest Drive - Ste. 201 42-700 Bob Hope Dr., Ste. 304 Laguna Hills, CA 92653 Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 _ The information contained here^ '-as been obtained from sources we believe reliable. We c- It, however, assume responsibility for its accuracy. All conditions subject to chang, out notice. ZO/ . ..... e 47PI .51 1 ro. os"/ off' ' ,,,J:3 .t, `® N In tQ LLJ ff 0 of 0 4w-'r rr 0 -9f WOvz/y f di 6. VWI gOd f^2 6f 8� -------------- - cd Mg 1w qvzt Aq 667 IS C-3, TI t3 Zq'o v/v OV9.90 SZ OtY9S 0 ti 917 900 -71 r :� JN�600 NV�Y6F0 %JyYbF`O 4 ot H , - X c qY d`j•y �' : may:.. _ 90 9/ ° 'yy� 9or SF 0 o ENVY/Si7 N a7! 'b<v 0 . /r cc IL �'F�• �.. .. u•y-� ' .':pv'�b'SZ% � - •A �,. � 9N'7V6b.04900 l! � d \ � Y yy ""� .Nwezo i xv�vsso rr' -V.'60 89 rz 1 O ,vm T a 3' allbft 1 Q) I 1 A 1 � l NAME AND ADDRESSES OF PROPERTY OWNERS FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON CASE NO. JOB NO. PARCEL NO. NAME ADDRESS 7790�) Avetacv ¢ SrAQs cal 01 fit; �• 1'22(00 roll -S3o _Olo (1 1- 8Qo -oDt a4 ociz 1p►,q -540 i CERTIFIED PROPERTY OWNERS' LIST AFFIDAVIT STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) CITY OF PALM DESERT ) I , _:nAq�S hereby certify that the attached list contains the names and addresses of all persons to whom all property is assessed as they appear on the latest available assess- ment role of the County within the area described on the attached application and for a distance of three hundred (300) feet from the exterior boundaries of the property described on the attached application. I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. (signed) (date) �� i CASE NO. (Kyf.Q�� ( F)ac� 1M®=C&nD 2a Environmental Assessment Form TO THE APPLICANT: Your cooperation in completing this form and supplying\the information requested will expedite City review of your application pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. The City is required to make an environmental assessment on all projects which it exercises discretionary approval over. Applications submitted will not be considered complete until all information necessary to make the environmental assessment is complete. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1 . Name, address, and telephone number of owner, applicant r pro 1`I ect sponsor: 4l7( ,S' l1hl� I1�G � Irl � ��� �T� �S� (�� �f Csa-L! �12 (a�7^�i �j�� •c73C�' 2. Name, address and telephone number of person to be contacted con- cerning the pr jec (such as architect, engineer, or of er repre- sentative) : ►� 830 �7!'S — 2013 ORR — k 3. Common name of project (if any) : '- - 4. Project location/(street address or general location) : 5. Precise legal descri t' n of ropgg,rrt (lot and ract nu ber, or meets & bounds) :�Q/�- c� �o -O/ � 0/�7 /nT P3! IWO *13 q /S 6. Proposed use of the site (project for which the form is filed; describe the total undertaking, not just the current application approval being sought) : l rJ . 7. Relationship to a larger project or series of projects (describe how this project relates to other activities, phases, ao develop- ments planned, or now underway): "{� � IS ,to V(�, 1"�(2S� �l �Fc lie� �l� OUST, K KS w ' s c 1 8. List 'aUESnd describe any'other re ated permits and o'tHer public approvals required for this project, to go forward, including those required by the City, Regional , State and Federal agencies (indicate sub- sequent approval agency name, and type of approval, required) : EXISTING CONDITIONS: X ( 9. Project site area: LOT-S Size of property in sq. ft. or acreage) 10. Present zoning: .S S P (Proposed zoning) : 11 . General Plan land use designation: J� � 'i�;P 12. Existing use of the project site: — 13. Existing use on adjacent properties: (Example - North, Shopping Center; South, Single Family Dwelli�s; East, Vacant, etc. ). �/�cw4tiT 14. Site topography (describe): 6 L'Irzi H T SLOPE _W,RD t So 15. Are there any natural or manmad rainage channels through or adjacent to the property? NO X YES 16. Grading (estimate number of cubic yards of dirt being moved) : 17. List the number, size and type of trees being removed S 18. Describe any cultural , historic, or scenic aspects of the project site: --- 140H E v 19. Residential Project (if not residential do NOT answer) A. Number and type of dwelling units (Specify no. of bedrooms) : B. Schedule of unit sizes: C. Number of stories Height feet. D. Largest single building (sq. ft. ) (hgt. ) E. Type of household size expected (population projection for the project) : F. Describe the number and type of recreational facilities : G. Is there any night lighting of the project: H. Range of sales prices or rents: $ to $ I. Percent of total project devoted to: Building . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . % Paving, including streets. . . . . . . . . . . % Landscaping, Open, Recreation Area . . . . . . . % 20. Commercial Industrial , Institutional or Other Project: A. Type of use(s) and major function(s) (if offices, specify type & number): a(2 6ER nS> GDA<2EES B. Number of square feet in total building area: 401, 0 C. Number of stories Height feet. D. Largest single building (Sq. Ft. ) (H9t• ) E. Number of square feet in outdoor storage area:: 78 �O O F. Total number of req .r d parking spaces Vf 1 number provided ..tt . G. Hours of operation: [J 46l 5 H. Maximum number of clients, patrons , shoppers, etc. , at one time: I . Maximum number of employees at one time: J.. If patron seating is involved, state the number: K. Is there any night lighting of the project: Yes �— No L. Percent of total project devoted to: Building . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-70o Y Paving, including streets. . . . . . . . . .5rev 0 Landscaping and Open Space (Recreation). rJ.� �i5 : . ;y Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects : Discuss below all items checked yes (attach additional sheets as necessary). "y YES N0 21 . Change in existing features of hillsides, or substantial alteration of ground contours. 22. Change in the dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in the project vicinity. 23. Subject to or resulting in soil errosion by wind or flooding. 24. Change in ground water quality or quantity, or alteration of existing drainage patterns. 25. Change in existing noise or vibration level in the vicinity. Subject to roadway or airport noise (has the required acoustical report been submitted?) 26. Involves the use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives. 27. Involves the use of substantial amounts of X fuel or energy. 28. Changes the demand for municipal services Y (police, fire, sewage, etc. ) 29. Changes the demand for utility services , beyond those presently available or planned in the near future. 30. Significantly affects any unique or natural features, including mature trees. 31 . Change in scenic views or vistas from existing y residential areas or public land or public roads. '\ 32. Results in the dislocation of people. 0" YES NO 33. Generates controversy based on aesthetics or other features of the project. [ ] Additional explanation of "yes" answers attached. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation, to the best of my ability, and that the facts , statements and information presented are true and correct to the best of my,knowledge and belief. Name Print or ype For Si atUre Date 0 INITIAL STUDY FEE: $30. 00 (Make check payable to the City of Palm Desert and sub— mit with this form. ) P ZISE PLAN APPLICATION NO. _ TO THE CITY OF PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION: APPLICANT'S NAME: James E. Rodgers owner, purchaser, lessee, representative APPLICANT'S ADDRESS: 17802 Sky Park Circle #104, Irvine, CA 92714 APPLICANT'S PHONE: 714-979-3900 PROJECT COORDINATOR: Patrick Evan Sheehy PHONE: 346-0596 The applicant, James E. Rodgers for the property situated at Lots 39 & 40, Tract 13915, MB 120 30 - intersection of on property zoned as SBya�drlk and St. James Place being legally described on the attached form. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE: gow� NOTARIZATION OF OWNER'S PERMISSION I (we) do hereby certify, under penalty of perjury, that I (we) are the owner(s) of the real property legally described herein and hereby grant permission for which this application is made. MESA DEVELOPMENT 11 �Yf 7/8/83 Arthur F. Ferry (signature) Date Please print name here) 4262 Campus Dr., Suite C Newport Beach, CA 92660 (Address) City STATE OF CALIFORNIA, County of Orange On 8 July 19 83 I before me, the undersigned a Notary Public in and for the State of California with principal office in the County of Orange , personally appeared OFFICIAL D Arthur F. Ferry l D . BECKER known to me to be the person whose name JEAN NOTARY PUBLI CALIF %"'A is subscribed to PRO0.AINGE OCFICEI the within Instrument, and acknowledged to me that OUNTV 84 he executed the same. MY COMMISSION EXP WITNESS my hand and ficial seal. '"" - .. i Signature of Notary: Notary ublic in and for the State of California ,f d[� m+ � VY CITY OF PALM DESERT DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL SCRVIC S EXFiQT NO. CASE NO. . Pl h 3' F r: �4 r r. • i " h- ' t�1 " Sv ly y i 4" W t� s w SUMMARY S f Lu Z co C/) c r, o �q cts k CL uj co uoi ` 't3 CL o o J' _ a _1 c CC<CL no,..PATE 3 PAEPARED FOR JOB NO. $3-07 REVISIONSr JIM RODGERSAl i SHEET NO. r OFF *F -- SUMMARY s.7= iLje-� f� �t7t� / PREPARED FOR JIM RODGERS Ili ll c�Ps'5- sI 57is 5.5% e rr V N W0 N r cr Lu F- Z W U W Z (� 0 F- CO � U Lij +r al (/) a LLI C] a� O o J E L ca 0 Q GATE 4-25-83 JOB NO. 83-07 REVISIONS SHEET NO. OF mm