Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
PP 16-83 INDUSTRIAL BUILDING/ECLECTIC STREET FILE 3 2001
PRECISE, PLAN L j lbt�''a TENTATIVE TRACT ZONE CHANGE PARCEL MAP_ VAMANCE C.U.P. REFI_R TO: T APPLICANT: LOCAT ION : REQUEST: EXISTING ZONE: PREPARATION PROGRESS DATE BY COMMENTS APPLICATION RECEIVED LEGAL_PUBLICATION SENT NOTICES SENT FIELD INVESTIGATION DEPTS. NOTIFIED BUILDING ENGINEERING FIRE POLICE RECREATION & PARKS SCHOOL DISTRICT K 6 CA 6 DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS FLOOD CONTROL PRELIMINARY MEETING c_ STAFF REPORT FINAL PLAN APPROVAL PRECISE PLAN (6) LANDSCAPING PLAN (5) PLAN. DIRECTOR MOD. (6) HEARINGS & ACTIONS _ DATE ACTION VOTE REVIEW BOARD HEARING P.C. HEARING PUBLISHED PC. PUBLIC HEARING APPLICANT NOTIFIED C.G. PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE NO. RESOLUTION NO. EFFECTIVE DATE _RECORDED FOR DATA BANK ZONING MAP CORRECTED i Gra 14 34.Falk, Dave etal , Falk, Saynot Armored Transport ,lnc. Howard P. Marguleas, et al 1612 W. Pico Blvd.. Ardith B. Marguleas et al " Los Angeles, Ca. 90015 c/o AG Accting Inc. , POB 9110 Bakersfield, Ca. 93389 ,. . 15 Grand Rent A Car Corp. Thomas E. Kyser 555 S. Flower St. , Ste 4140 P.O. Box K Los Angeles, Ca. 90071 Palm Desert, Ca. 92261 2,9,16,17 27. Cook Hovley Street Assoc. Mahoney, Thomas Patrick TR 73640 El Paseo Mahoney, Rhoda Jean TR Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 5 Collins Isle Balboa Island, Ca. 92662 3 --- _ 28. rc U.S. Postal Service Donald K. Oster 850 Cherry Ave. P.O. Box 2853 San Bruno, Ca. 94066 Palm Desert, Ca. 92261 Cook Hovley Street Assoc. Krinnit, Ben b Krinnit, Sally 73861 Rutledge 1479 Blue Jay Way Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 Los Angeles, Ca. 90699 7. 30. Len Non Co. Avriette, Gene b Margaret Y. 47 Signal Hills No. A 69941 Papaya Lane West St. Paul , MN 55118 Cathedral City, Ca. 92234 �)._... .I Yam- 8. 31 . Cook Hovley Street Assoc. Daniel M. b Gloria K. Kelly c/o CAM Const. Daniel R. S Kathleen A. Williams 3285 Date Palm Dr. 48900 Paisano Drive Cathedral City, Ca. 92234 Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 0. 32. ovley Group Groeschel , Charges b Robyn 63 Sierra Way Caine, Brian aim Springs, Ca. 92264 P.O. Box 789 Palm Springs, Ca. 92263 1 33 r ovley Group Prince Loadsman Joint Venture - 8713 Perez Rd. , Unit 1 1030 W. Manchester Blvd. erris, Ca. 92234 Inglewood, Ca. 90301 A � I 2. "aimik*xRaxaxatxatzxJiaikxxSmyxo almer Broad4'sthg4Co. . p .0. Box 368 11 alm �esert, Ca. 92260 , 13• P Desert Mini Warehouse 7?k dba Mini Storage of Palm Desert c/o Marshall L. Morgan 4020 Birch St. , Ste 103 Newport Beach, Ca. 92660 2 •- Gra 14. 34.Falk, Dave eta] , Falk, Saynot Armored Transport Inc. Howard P. Marguleas, et al 1612 W. Pico Blvd. Ardith B. Marguleas et al Los Angeles , Ca. 90015 c/o AG Accting Inc. , POB 91.10 Bakersfield, Ca. 93389 1 . 15. Grand Rent A Car Corp. Thomas E. Kyser 555 S. Flower St. , Ste 4140 P.O. Box K . Los Angeles, Ca. 90071 Palm Desert, Ca. 92261 2,9, 16, 17 27. -- Cook Hovley Street Assoc. Mahoney, Thomas Patrick TR 73640 El Paseo Mahoney, Rhoda Jean TR -Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 5 Collins Isle Balboa Island, Ca. 92662 3 28. U.S . Postal Service Donald K. Oster 850 Cherry Ave. P.O. Box 2853. San Bruno, Ca. 94066 Palm Desert, Ca. 92261 - ----- ------ - 5 29. Cook Hovley Street Assoc. Krinnit , Ben & Krinnit, Sally 73861 Rutledge 1479 Blue Jay Way Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 Los_ Angeles, Ca. 90699 7. 30. Len Non Co. Avriette, Gene & Margaret Y. , 47 Signal Hills No. A 69941 Papaya Lane West St. Paul , MN 55118 Cathedral City, Ca. 92234 8. 31 . Cook Hovley Street Assoc. Daniel M. & Gloria K. Kelly c/o CAM Const . Daniel R. & Kathleen A. Williams 33255 Date Palm Dr. 48900 Paisano Drive . Cathedral City, Ca. 92234 Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 10. Hovley Group Groesc3� 563 Sierra Way _ Caine, Briel , Charges & Robyn Caine, Brian Palm Springs, Ca. 92264 P.O. Box 789 Palm Springs , Ca. 92263 11 . 33. Hovley Group Prince Loadsman Joint Venture 68713 Perez Rd. , Unit 1 1030 W. Manchester Blvd. Perris, Ca. 92234 Inglewood, Ca. 90301 -------------- '12. -- Sltxkam*kxxidaxexeiixaxka*kgxBa�A ?almer Broadcasting Co. 1.0. Box 368 ?alm Desert , Ca. 92260 13. Palm Desert Mini Warehouse 8 dba Mini Storage of Palm Desert c/o Marshall L. Morgan 4020 Birch St . , Ste 103 Newport Beach, Ca. 92660 A Waste Management Company PALM DESERT DISPOSAL EXPANSION 6 GROWTH HISTORY: Palm Desert Disposal began operations in the Coachella Valley during the 1950's. In 1966 Palm Desert Disposal was sold to Fred Brignardello and Gino Scopesi both of whom are still with the company. They sold the company in 1972 to S.C.A. Services, Inc. , who were acquired by the current owners, Waste Management Inc. , the nations leading solid waste hauling company, in September 1985. The mission of Waste Management Inc. , is to be the acknowledged worldwide leader providing comprehensive services of high quality utilizing state of the art systems that are responsive to our customers' needs and which preserve or enhance our environment. In fulfilling this mission, we shall provide a rewarding work environment for our employees, co-operate with all relevant agencies of government and be a responsible neighbor and coporate citizen while increasing shareholder value. Palm Desert Disposal has expanded with the community's needs throughout its history. In 1986 two major acquisitions were achieved, Bill 's Sanitation a portable toilet company now known as Port-O-Let and Coachella Valley Disposal , Inc. a rubbish hauling firm who serviced the city of Indio. In 1987 Palm Desert Disposal completed our "site services" concept with the additional business lines of office trailers, Port-O-Fence and temporary power. CURRENT ACTIVITIES: Palm Desert Disposal currently services the following: 46,011 Residential Customers 6,910 Commercial Bins 1 ,250 Construction Roll-Off Bins 568 Portable Toilet Units 25 Office Trailers Assorted Temporary Fences and Power Pole Jobs Our current .location is centrally located in the Coachella Valley and currently serves the following communities: Palm Desert, Rancho Mirage, Cathedral City, La Quinta, Indian Wells, Indio and unicorporated areas of the county around the Coachella Valley. All the above cities has been serviced from °this location since 1984. THE FUTURE: The aquisition of these subsidiaries in conjunction with the positive growth pattern of the Coachella Valley nesessitate the expansion of the current facilities to allow for an orderly and planned growth of Palm Desert Disposal as well as continuing its policy of providing efficient and competitive "site services" to the communities it serves. As additional communities grow in the valley and surrounding areas it is currently envisioned that Palm Desert Disposal would be able to service the area bordered by Sky Valley to the north, the San Jacinto Mountains to the south, the City of Coachella to the east, and Palm Springs to the west. Any service beyond that area would probably require other facilities. As stated previously Palm Desert Disposal currently services 46,000 residences and 6,900 commercial bins with its rubbish hauling operation. This service is handled by 26 refuse vehicles. We see the growth of the Valley, based on Chamber of Commerce figures and studies, as listed below. CURRM1P POPULATION S wears 15 years PALM DESERT 161500 23 ,700 48,800 RAN(=O MIRAGE 91500 13 ,600 28,100 I3WIO 40,000 57,400 118,400 OTHERS 47,500 68,200 140,500 Based on these population projections an additional 8 residential trucks and 4 commercial trucks would be required in five years and as many as 36 additional residential trucks and 19 co�ercial trucks in IS years. This is based on the assumption that Palm Desert Disposal will continue to service 40.5% of the population and using industry standards of one residential truck servicing 2500 residences and one commercial truck for every 700 bins. The level of construction activity in the Coachella valley is expected to increase over the next 15 years to accommadats the growth projections listed above. It is expected that there will be fluctuations in this projection. The following list shows the required inventory to meet these construction needs. CURRENT 5 Years 15 years Sim 11250 11795 3,700 TRAILERS 25 36 74 TOILETS 560 800 11660 PBCCIII.ITY REQUMMU PTS: The expansion of the Palm Desert Disposal facility at 41-575 Eclectic Street has been planned with the satisfying of neighbor' s concerns as well as maintaining security and traffic flow for efficient and safe operations. It also recognizes the quality of development within the Industrial park and the expansion has been designed to compliment those surrounding facilities. Some of these plans include: 1. An 8 ' high slump stone wall with interior screen walls 2. Upgraded landscaping and concreted throughout 3. Employee parking relocated to expansion a. This is important because it allows the route truck parking to stay within the existing walls of the facility 4. Expansion area uses include: a. Construction services storage b. Enlarged washdown area. c. Sweeper cleanout d. Spare truck storage e. Employee parking area S. Office and maintenance expansion will be on existing property and will blend architectually to the existing facility, with upgraded landscaping. This expansion of the physical property is projected to contain safely and efficiently the 1S year growth pattern indicated previously. i SUMMARY: Palm Desert Disposal is looking to the future and planning to provide trash hauling and temporary construction services to Palm Desert and the surrounding valley with competitive prices and state of the art efficiency as the valley grows. . Palm Desert Disposal is a service oriented company whose growth and success must compliment the needs and requirements of a growing modern community. Palm Desert Disposal works hard to provide community support in enviromental issues and other interests of its people. The expansion of the facility is in an area specifically zoned and set aside by the City to accommadate such service industries as what Palm Desert Disposal provides for the community. Proposed screening will limit visual pollution from surrounding . properties in a positive way. Traffic will not be adversley affected. This expansion is not a health hazard. -,I I I I Y O M DESERI 73-510 PRED WARING DRIVE t '`± PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260-2578 TEL: 760 346—o6i I FAX: 760 341-7o98 info@palm-desert.org October 1 , 2001 Mr. Kermit Martin Waste Management 41-575 Eclectic Street Palm Desert, California 92260 Re: Waste Management Facility Uses at 41-575 Eclectic Street Dear Mr. Martin: The list of uses and services provided at the Eclectic Street facility described in your letter of September 7, 2001, are consistent with those permitted in the Service Industrial zone. There have been no code violations identified or specific complaints received concerning the operation of the facility. Sincerely, Philip Drell Director of Community Development AM (Wod.cM m\c.,6mmn.od) R gs Ie xitY Gx ol[no inv RECEIVED . SCn 14 2001 WASTE MANAGEMENT WIM COMMUNITY DMOPMENT 41.575 Eclectic Street MD Palm Desert,CA92260 CRYOFPAlMOESOEPAItfMENT DESERT (760) 340.5901 September 7, 2001 (760) 340-2732 Fax wwwwmdesert.com Mr. Phil Drell Director of Community Development City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 Dear Phil: This letter is to confirm our discussion of September 6, 2001 concerning added services and activities being performed at our service center in Palm Desert. As you know we provide refuse and recycling collection services to seven cities and Riverside County from our yard at 41-575 Eclectic Street. The following is a list of the different activities we perform at the Palm Desert facility: • Administrative and operating offices • Vehicle maintenance, parking and fueling • Bin and container storage and repair • Port-O-Let storage and maintenance • Collect and transfer recycled materials • Operation of a buy-back center for recycled items • Receive and transfer green waste from local residents and gardeners • Provide a public access CNG fueling station • Provide a center for the collection of household hazardous waste We understand the above activities are permitted by existing use permits and by the service industrial zoning of the site. In view of the added services that have been developed over the last several years of operation at this site, we would appreciate a letter from you confirming that we are operating within the permitted limits at this location. Thank you for meeting with us and for your consideration of this request. Please call me or Frank Orlett at 760-340-5901 if you should have any questions. Sincerely, Lt Martin Director of Government Affairs KMvw RESOLUTION NO . 87-78 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, SETTING REFUSE COLLECTION SERVICE RATES WITHIN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT AND RESCINDING RATES ESTABLISHED UNDER RESOLUTION NO. 86-71 WHEREAS , on the 10th day of September , 1981 , the City of Palm Desert , California , authorized an Exclusive Contract to Perform Refuse Collection Services to Palm Desert Disposal ; and WHEREAS, THEREFORE , BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Palm Desert that effective the Ist day of Julyy_,_ 1987 , Resolution No . 86- 71 is hereby rescinded ; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that effective the Ist day of July . 1987 , the schedule of refuse collection service rates is hereby amended to reflect the following : 1 . Individual Residential Charqes . A . Once weekly pickup - 6 cans , bags or bundles 1 . Curb Service $5 . 90 per month 2 . Walk- In Service 7 . 72 per month B . Each additional can : 1 . Curb Service 3 . 20 per month 2 . Walk- In Service 3 . 80 per month Note : Walk- in service shall not exceed 60 feet from curb . There shall be an additional charge for distance beyond 60 Feet as follows : For each additional 20 feet or part thereof , a charge of 62• cents per unit of 20 foot distance shall be charged . If the distance from the curb to the can is 90 feet , the charge will be $ 1 . 05 additional per month . 2 . Multiple Dwellings : A . Central one- stop location of trash : Curb : I . First Unit $5 . 90 tier, month CITY OF PALM DESE RESOLUTION NO. 87-78 Page 2 Multiple Dwellings - ( Cont ' d ) i 2 . Each Additional Unit 3 . 20 per month Walk- In : I . First Unit 7 . 70 per month 2 . Each Additional Unit 5 . 00 per month B . Other than central location of trash : Curb : 1 . First Unit 5 . 90 per month 2 . Each additional unit 3 . 8U per month Walk- in : 1 . First Unit 7 . 70 per month 2 . Each additional unit 6 . 50 per month 3 . Mobile Home Parks A . Central Building/Walk- In G . 9U per unit Service B . Central Building/Curb 4 . 90 per unit Service 4 . Commercial Rates will be as Follows : Time Two Yard Three Yard Four Yard Per Week Bin Din Bin 1 34 . 40 42 . 90 57 . 40 2 57 . 40 70 . 40 87 . 40 3 60 . 50 99 . 20 119 . 50 4 103 . 3U 124 . 60 151 . 00 5 126 . 30 153 . 50 183 . 80 6 172 . 20 180 . 60 211 . 20 CITY OF PALM DESEF RESOLUTION NO. 87-78 Page 3 Pickup 12 Yard 20 Yard 3i1 Yard 40 Y a i d Per Week Dirt Box Droonff Drppuff_ 1 $ 58 . 50 $56 . 50 $ 79 . 30 $93 . 9U No rental ma i ntenance w i l l be cl):,rgecl for the f i rsl. seven ( 7 ) days . The rate of $ 2 . 50 per day will be charged after the seventh ( 7th ) day . 5 . Special Haul $ 7 . 50 first fifteen minutes of loading time only and $2 . 75 per each additional five minutes . 6 . Bulky Household Items Bulky household ,items that , because of their size or weight ( such as Fur nil: ure , l . V . ' s appliannes , et. c . ) cannot be collected on reoular routes shall be collect - ed based on the Special Haul rate . 7 . Start Fees A $ 10 . 00 restart fee may be charged to all customers who had prior, service . discontinue same and Chen resume service . 8 . Unusual Conditions For collections Iequiririu spFcial equipulelit or olher wise not set forth in Lhi , Agreement , rates may be charged as shall be .screed uuon by the Contractor and the customer . BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a surcharge is here!)v allowed to cover the County of Riverside Waste Disposal gate fee ; and 1 . That Palm Desert, Disp(- 5ai Shall notifv their customers that the surr_harye is added to tllr_ basic Servir'e rake . 2 . That such a surr_hatge h,35 beer) in efFect since Ochr [)er I , 1987 . 3 . That Palm De5er 1: 1) isPo S.ril sha11 cause 1: Ije Pr 2p.ir eCl by an independent: a u d i l', film wiI- Iin 61j days ', ft01 March 31st of every vear I in ..rncial sl,.il: -a(it enl_ clearly indicating the fees Paid to 1: 11e Country of Riverside pursuant to the wa ; te r1igpn _.;31 a.,ite fea program and flip i 1)C1 Pr3$, r1 I eVrnijr rp, o i vPrl- .35 a ern_ ,i Y Of imposing the sufcharo CITY OF PALM DESE.- RESOLUTION NO. 87-78 Page 4 4 . That the surcharge be ad iusLed aftFr the audi t report is furnished to the City according to the amount of revenue generated as compared to the actual cost of disposal plus 10 % for an adrn1nlstrative overhead allowance . Any audit - identified surplus shall be used as a credit For the ensuing fiscal year surcharge revenue account . The City Manager is hereby authorized to negotiate a Fair surcharge based on the information provided . 5 . That the City of Palm Desert shall not include revenue received from the surcharge in gross receipt subject to franchise fees . PASSED , APPROVED and ADOPTED by the CiLy Council of the City of Palm Desert , California . on this 13th day of August , 1987 , by the following vote , to wit : AYES : BENSON , CRITES , SITYDER , WILSON NOES : KELLY ABSENT : NUHE ABSTAIN : NONE RICH RU S . KELLY . MAYOR ATTEST : SHEILA R . GILL GAN , CITY RK CITY OF 'PALM DESERT , CAL F RNIA resoluti i RESOLUTION NO. 87-78 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, SETTING REFUSE COLLECTION SERVICE RATES WITHIN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT AND RESCINDING RATES ESTABLISHED UNDER RESOLUTION NO. 86-71 WHEREAS , on the IOth day of September , 1981 , the City of Palm Desert , California , authorized an Exclusive Contract to Perform Refuse Collection Services to Palm Desert Disposal ; and WHEREAS, THEREFORE , BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Palm Desert that effective the Is day of Jul .._ 1987 , Resolution No. 86-71 is hereby rescinded ; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that effective the 1st day of July , 1987 , the schedule of refuse collection service rates is hereby amended to reflect the following : 1 . Individual Residential Charges A . Once weekly pickup - 6 cans , bags or bundles 1 . Curb Service $5 . 90 per month 2 . Walk- In Service 7 . 72 per month B. Each additional can : 1 . Curb Service 3 . 20 per month 2 . Walk- In Service 3 . 80 per month Note : Walk- in service shall not exceed 60 feet frorn curb . There shall be an additional charge for distance beyond 60 Feet as follows : For each additional 20 feet or part thereof , a charge of 62• cents per unit of 20 foot distance shall be charged . If the distance from the curb to the can is 90 feet , the charge will be $ 1 . 05 additional per month . 2 . Multiple Dwellings : A . Central one- stop location of trash : Curb : 1 . First Unit $ ri . 90 ;per, month CITY OF PALM DESG _ RESOLUTION NO. 87-78 ., Page 2 � I Multiple Dwellings - ( Cont ' d ) i . 2 . Each Additional Unit 3 . 20 per month Walk- In : 1 . First Unit 7 . 70 per month 2 . Each Additional Unit 5 . 00 per month B . Other than central location of trash : Curb : 1 . First Unit 5 . 90 per month 2 . Each additional unit 3 . 80 per month Walk- in : 1 . First Unit 1 . 70 per month 2 . Each additional unit 6 . 50 per month 3 . Mobile Horne Parks A . Central Building/Walk- In 6 . 90 per unit Service B . Central Building/Curb 4 . 90 per unit Service 4 . Commercial Rates will be as follows : Time Two Yard Three Yard Four Yard Per Week Bin Bin Bin 1 34 . 40 42 . 90 57 . 40 2 57 . 40 70 . 40 81 . 40 3 80 . 50 99 . 20 119 . 50 4 103 . 3U 124 . 60 01 . 60 5 126 . 30. 153 . 5n 183 . 80 6 172 . 20 180 . 60 211 . 21) J CIT.Y`OF PALM DESER , RESOLUTION NO. 87-78 Page 3 Pickup 12 Yard 20 Yard 30 Yard 40 Yard Per Week Dirt Box DropoFI' Dropnff Ur�Ouuff 1 $58 . 50 $58 . 50 $ 79 . 3n $93 . 9u No renta l ma i ntenance w i l l be r,l,<irged For the f i r51. seven ( 7 ) days . The rate or h "L . So per d-_iv will be charged after the seventh ( 7th ) day . 5 . Special Haul $ 7 . 50 first fifteen minutes of loading time only and $2 . 75 per each additional Five minutes . 6 . Bulky Household Items 8uIky household items that , because of their size or weight ( such as furniture , f V . ' s auplianres , etc . ) cannot be coIIected on regtiIar r•;utes shall be collect - ed based on the Special Haul rate . 7 . Start Fees A $ 10 . 00 restart fee may be charged to all customers who had Prior' service . discontinue same and r_ I,eri resume set-vice . 8 . Unusual Conditions For collections reguiriug spe i a i e,.ruipmenr. ur of- her wise not set Forth in Lit s Acir , ernent , rates may be charged as shall be acrreed upon by the Contractor and the customer . BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a surcharge is hereLry allowed to cover the County of Riverside Waste Disposal gate fee ; dnd I . That Palm Desert Disposai shall not: ifv their (_ustomers that the surcharge is added to t1,t basic service race . 2 . That such a surcharge has been ir, eFFe(- t since October I , 1987 . 3 . That Palm Desert 1) i ;Po;:iI shall c +use to tje DrerpireII by an 1 ndeoendent and i t f i I w i th i n r; 0 'lays :, Fter _ March 3 t s t of every vear , fin ..rncial ', t..iI: fit Pni c I ear 1 y i nd i rat 1 nu the tees Pa i d to I- lie County of Riverside Pursuant to the wasf. e di So-, ; ;il aite fea program and the i nr�r enSN :I I tvrnlla rr,_e i vP(I .J� a rr';u I t of Impo5 i n a the su r'c ha r�Li CITY OF PALM DESE:. , RESOLUTION NO. 87- 78 Page 4 4 . That the surcharge be ad iusted aftFr- the audi t report is Furnished to the City accord 1nu to the amount of revenue generated as compared to the actual cost of disposal plus 10 % for an administrative overhead allowance . Anv audit- identified surplus shall be used as a c r e d 1 t. for the ensu 1 ng f i sca I year surcharge revenue account . The City Manager is hereby authorized to negotiate a fair surcharge based on the information provided . 5 . That the City of Palm Desert shall not include revenue received from the surcharge in gross receipt subject to franchise fees . PASSED , APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Palm Desert , California , on this 13th day of August , 1987 , by the following vote , to wit : AYES : BENSON , CRITES , SNYDER , WILSON NOES : KELLY ABSENT : NONE ABSTAIN : NONE RICH RD S . KELLY . MAYOR - ATTEST : J VRN�IA SHEILA R . GILL GAN , CITYCITY OF PALM DESERT, CAL resoluti 1. (KMV 0 p uffm Q&ACN 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE(619)346-0611 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NOTICE OF ACTION Date: November 19, 1987 Palm Desert. Disposal Howard Parsell a 41-575 Eclectic Street 4815 Main Street Palm Desert, CA 92260 Yorba Linda, CA 92686 Re: PP 16-83 Amendment #2 The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of November 17, 1987. Approved by adoption of Planning Commission Resolutlon No. 1263. Carried 4-0. Anv appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Community Development, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen ( 15) days of the date of the decision. RAMON A. DIAZ, SECRETP�) PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION RAD/tm PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1263 i A RESO LUI I ON Ill` 11IE PLANN I NG COMM I SS I UH OP I I IL CITY OF PALM DESERT , CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PRECISE PLAN OF DESIGN AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT TO ALLOW A 3.58 ACRE. EXPANSION TO A PARKING AND STORAGE AREA AND ..A SECOND STORY ADDITION TO AN EXISTING STRUCTURE LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF LENNON PLACE BETWEEN ECLECTIC AND CORPORATE WAY. CASE NO: PP 16-83 AMENDMENT #2 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Nesert , California, did on the 17th day of November, 1987, hold a duly neticeci ptjblic hearing to consider the request of PALM DESERT DISPOSAL for approval of a negative declaration and precise plan of design for the above mentioned project; and WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedure For Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 80-89", in that the director of community develop- ment has determined that the project will not have a siranificant ;trlverse impact on the environment and a negative declaration has been prep red, and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persoiis desiring to be heard, said planning commission did find the f0110winQ fart, and reasons to exit to justify granting approval of said precise plan: I . The precise plan is consistent with the intent and purpose of the service industrial zone and the Palm Desert General Plan. 2. The use is Speeifical ly permitted by section 2'�. i4.02U pf the Palin Desert Municipal Code. 3. The project will not endanger the public Peace, health, safety or general welfare. 4. The use has previously been determined to be 3cr_ept:.9ble at this location. 5. Since the time of the orininal plan apprnval office/industrial projects have been approved in the area . the ornject may be detrimental to some extent on property values taut not: substantially while the use will be low in terms of marking which coulcl benefit the area if parking problems occur. 6. The facility is under county health permit, whirl) protects the health concerns etc. ,PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1263 NOW, THEREFORE, BE If RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert , California, as follows: 1 . Thai the :.jbove recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the commission in this case. 2. That approval of Precise Plan 16-83 Amendment g2 is hereby granted for reasons subject to the attached conditions. 3. That a negative declaration of environmental impact is hereby approved and said negative declaration and initial study, therefore, are attached hereto as exhibit "A" and made a part hereof. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning COMfn15SIOn, held on this 17th day of November, 1987, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: LADLOW, RICHARDS, WHITLOCK, AND ERWOOD NOES: NONE 9 ASSENT: DOWNS ABSTAIN: NONE R 1 CHARD ERWOOD, 0ia i rrnan ATTEST:)) RAt10N P . DIAZ, Secr ta�y4 r /tm 2 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1263 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL _ CASE NO. PP 16-83 Amendment #2 Department of Community Development: 1 . The development of the property shall conform substantially with exhibits on file with the department of community development, as modified by the following conditions. 2. Construction of a portion of said project shall commence within one year from the date of final approval unless an extension of time is granted; otherwise said approval shall become null , void and of no effect whatsoever. 3. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein which are in addition to all municipal ordinances and state and federal statutes now in force, or which hereafter may be in force. 4. Prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contemplated by this approval , the applicant shall first obtain permits and/or clearance from the following agencies: Riverside County Department of Health Palm Desert Architectural Commission City Fire Marshal Coachella Valley Water District Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to the department of building and safety at the time of issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. 5. Applicant agrees to join an assessment district and contribute reasonable assessment fees for future improvements to Cook Street. 6. Applicant to pay applicable fees for Art in Public Places program. 7. Applicant to pay applicable lizard fees. 8. No residential trash trucks to use Lennon Place. 9. Landscaping to be upgraded throughout the site and include interior landscaping where adjacent to private property. 10. Applicant shall pay drainage fees in effect as the time of application, if said fees have not already been paid to the city as part of a previous approvals on this site. 3 PLANNING CONI'IISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1263 II . Applicant shall pay appropriate City of Palm Desert signalization fees in effert. dt IIie Iime, of application. Department of Public Works: I . Complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the city engineer for checking and approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. The engineer shall submit "as-built" plans prior to the acceptance of the improvements by the city. 2. All private driveways and parking lots shall be inspected by the engineering department and a standard inspection fee shall be paid prior to grading permit issuance. 3. Landscaping maintenance on Lennon Place and Corporate Way shall be provided h,,I tho property owner. 4. Complete grading plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the city engineer for checking and approval prior to lssuanr:e „r any I.-„ermits. 5. Offsite iml:nrovement plans to be approved by public works department and a surety posted to guarantee the required offsite improvements prior to grading permit: issuance. 6. Size, number and location of driveways to public works specifications with only one driveway approach from Lennon Place to be allowed to service this property. 7. Original conditions apply as per Planning Commission Resolution for Precise Plan 16-83. 8. Any and all offsite improvements shall be preceded by the approval of plans and the issuance of valid encroachment permits by the department of publis work;. City Fire Marshal : I . Additional fire protection requirements may be necessary when the applicant submits specific plans for consideration and approval . 2. All buildings over 5000 square feet require' an approved fire sprinkler system. /tm 4 s MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION NOVEMBER 17, 1987 Action: Moved by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner Whitlock, continuing PP 87-32 and VAR 87-3 to December I , 1987. Carried 4-0. B. Case No. P 6P 11 83 Amendment #2 - HONARD PARSELL, Applicant Request for approval of a 3.5 acre expansion to a parking and storage area and a second story addition to an existing structure (5400 sq. ft. ) located on the south side of Lennon Place between Eclectic and approximately 500 feet_ east of Corporate Way. Mr. Diaz outlined the salient points of the staff report and reviewed the concerns generated by the last application. He noted that a letter from the Riverside County Health Department had been supplied by the applicant; a letter had been received from George Berkey relaying agreement to the application per compliance with the provision of trees and landscaping; and with the mitigation measures, Mr. Diaz recommended approval . Chairman Erwood opened the public testimony and asked if the applicant wished to address the commission. i MR. GORDON PAULUS, representative, concurred with the staff report and provision of trees and landscaping per Mr. Berkey's letter. He addressed the issues of "port-a-johns" and explained how they would be cleaned before coming onto Palm Desert Disposal 's site. He also discussed the garbage trucks and the process used to clean them. Mr. Paulus read the letter from John Fanning of, the Riverside County Health Department and asked commission for any questions. Chairman Erwood asked if anyone present wished to speak in FAVOR or OPPOSITION.to the proposed. MR. ROGER LANGER, 74-489 Gary, President of Palm Desert Country Club Homeowners Association, explained that the only concerns he had were files and odor and assurance that there would be no transfer station. Chairman Erwood explained that the transfer station was not part of the application. Chairman Erwood closed the public testimony. 4 I _vr MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION NOVEMBER 17. 1987 Commissioner Richards commented on the mitigation measures and felt that the expansion was acceptable. Commissioner Ladlow asked for and received clarification from Mr. Paulus that this expansion was for 15 years. Commissioner Whitlock stated that her concerns had been addressed and was in favor of the expansion. Chairman Erwood felt that the applicant and staff had answered all the questions and concerns from prior meetings and impacts on neighbors, and indicated that the city has adequate ordinances to deal with odor and noise if a problem ever occurs. Action: Moved by Commissioner Ladlow, seconded by Commissioner Whitlock, adopting the findings as presented by staff. Carried 4-0. Moved by Commissioner Ladlow, seconded by Commissioner Whitlock, adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 1263, approving PP 16-83 Amendment #2, subject to conditions. Carried 4-0. Mr. Diaz noted that at the last commission meeting there was discussion regarding land for recreational vehicles to park and noted that two lots are not being used by Palm Desert Disposal for their expansion. He felt that possibly an agreement could be discussed for this use. Mr. Ray Burk of Palm Desert Disposal and Mr. Paulus indicated that they were willing to discuss this possibility. Vlll . MISCELLANEOUS A. Request for determination of Community Development Director's modification. Commission instructed staff that the above request should be brought back as a public hearing item. IX. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS None. S PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1263 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PRECISE PLAN OF DESIGN AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT TO ALLOW A 3.58 ACRE EXPANSION TO A PARKING AND STORAGE AREA AND A SECOND STORY ADDITION TO AN EXISTING STRUCTURE LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF LENNON PLACE BETWEEN ECLECTIC AND CORPORATE WAY. CASE NO: PP 16-83 AMENDMENT #2 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 17th day of November, 1987, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider the request of PALM DESERT DISPOSAL for approval of a negative declaration and precise plan of design for the above mentioned project; and WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedure for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 80-89", in that the director of community develop- ment has determined that the project will not have a significant adverse impact on the environment and a negative declaration has been prepared, and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said planning commission did find the following facts and reasons to exit to justify granting approval of said precise plan: I 1 . The precise plan is consistent with the intent and purpose of the �l service industrial zone and the Palm Desert General Plan. 2. The use is specifically permitted by section 25.34.020 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code. 3. The project will not endanger the public peace, health, safety or general welfare. 4. The use has previously been determined to be acceptable at this location. 5. Since the time of the original plan approval office/industrial projects have been approved in the area. The project may be detrimental to some extent on property values but not substantially while the use will be low in terms of marking which could benefit the area if parking problems occur. 6. The facility is under county health permits which protects the health concerns etc. i i PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1263 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1 . That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the commission in this case. 2. That approval of Precise Plan 16-83 Amendment #2 is hereby granted for reasons subject to the attached conditions. 3. That a negative declaration of environmental impact is hereby approved and said negative declaration and initial study, therefore, are attached hereto as exhibit "A" and made a part hereof. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 17th day of November, 1987, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: LADLOW, RICHARDS, WHITLOCK, AND ERWOOD NOES: NONE ABSENT: DOWNS ABSTAIN: NONE L/� J RICHARD EP.WOOD, Chairman ATTEST:.) RAMON A. DIAZ, Secr to /tm 2 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1263 i CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO. PP 16-83 Amendment #2 Department of Community Development: 1 . The development of the property shall conform substantially with exhibits on file with the department of community development, as modified by the following conditions. 2. Construction of a portion of said project shall commence within one year from the date of final approval unless an extension of time is granted; otherwise said approval shall become null , void and of no effect whatsoever. 3. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein which are in addition to all municipal ordinances and state and federal statutes now in force, or which hereafter may be in force. 4. Prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contemplated by this approval , the applicant shall first obtain permits and/or clearance from the following agencies: Riverside County Department of Health Palm Desert Architectural Commission City Fire Marshal Coachella Valley Water District Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to the department of building and safety at the time of issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. 5. Applicant agrees to join an assessment district and contribute reasonable assessment fees for future improvements to Cook Street. 6. Applicant to pay applicable fees for Art in Public Places program. 7. Applicant to pay applicable lizard fees. 8. No residential trash trucks to use Lennon Place. 9. Landscaping to be upgraded throughout the site and include interior landscaping where adjacent to private property. 10. Applicant shall pay drainage fees in effect as the time of application, if said fees have not already been paid to the city as part of a previous approvals on this site. 3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1263 ll . Applicant shall pay appropriate City of Palm Desert signalization fees in effect at the time of application. Department of Public Works: 1 . Complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the city engineer for checking and approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. The engineer shall submit "as-built" plans prior to the acceptance of the improvements by the city. 2. All private driveways and parking lots shall be inspected by the engineering department and a standard inspection fee shall be paid prior to grading permit issuance. 3. Landscaping maintenance on Lennon Place and Corporate Way shall be provided by the property owner. 4. Complete grading plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the city engineer for checking and approval prior to issuance of any permits. 5. Offsite improvement plans to be approved by public works department and a surety posted to guarantee the required offsite improvements prior to i:.... i grading permit issuance. 6. Size, number and location of driveways to public works specifications with only one driveway approach from Lennon Place to be allowed to service this property. 7. Original conditions apply as per Planning Commission Resolution for Precise Plan 16-83. 8. Any and all offsite improvements shall be preceded by the approval of plans and the issuance of valid encroachment permits by the department of public works. City Fire Marshal : 1 . Additional fire protection requirements may be necessary when the applicant submits specific plans for consideration and approval . 2. All buildings over 5000 square feet require an approved fire sprinkler system. /tm i i 4 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NOTICE OF ACTION Date: November 19, 1987 Palm Desert Disposal Howard Parsell 41-575 Eclectic Street 4815 Main Street Palm Desert, CA 92260 Yorba Linda, CA 92686 Re: PP 16-83 Amendment #2 The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of November 17, 1987. Approved by adoption of Planning Commission Resolution No 1263 Carried 4-0. Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Community Development, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen ( 15) days of the date of the decision. RAMON A. DIAZ, SECRETA� PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION RAD/tm PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1263 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PRECISE PLAN OF DESIGN AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT TO ALLOW A 3.58 ACRE EXPANSION TO A PARKING AND STORAGE AREA AND A SECOND STORY ADDITION TO AN EXISTING STRUCTURE LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF LENNON PLACE BETWEEN ECLECTIC AND CORPORATE WAY. CASE NO: PP 16-83 AMENDMENT #2 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert California , did on the 17th day of November, 1987, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider the request of PALM DESERT DISPOSAL for approval of a negative declaration and precise plan of design for the above mentioned project; and WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedure for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 80-8911, in that the director of community develop- ment has determined that the project will not have a significant adverse impact on the environment and a negative declaration has been prepared, and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said planning commission did find the following facts and reasons to exit to justify granting approval of said precise plan: 1 . The precise plan is consistent with the intent and purpose of the service industrial zone and the Palm Desert General Plan. 2. The use is specifically permitted by section 25.34.020 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code. 3. The project will not endanger the public peace, health, safety or general welfare. 4. The use has previously been determined to be acceptable at this location. 5. Since the time of the original plan approval office/industrial projects have been approved in the area. The project may be detrimental to some extent on property values but not substantially while the use will be low In terms of marking which could benefit the area if parking problems occur. 6. The facility is under county health permits which protects the health concerns etc. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1263 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1 . That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the commission in this case. 2. That approval of Precise Plan 16-83 Amendment #2 is hereby granted for reasons subject to the attached conditions. 3. That a negative 'declaration of environmental impact is hereby approved and said negative declaration and initial study, therefore, are attached hereto as exhibit "A" and made a part hereof. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of - the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 17th day of November, 1987, by the following vote, to wit: i I AYES: LADLOW, RICHARDS, WHITLOCK, AND ERWOOD NOES: NONE ABSENT: DOWNS ABSTAIN: NONE RICHARD ERWOOD, Chairman ATTEST: r RAMON A. DIAZ, Sec r to /tm 2 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1263 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ' CASE NO. PP 16-83 Amendment #2 Department of Community Development: 1 . The development of the property shall conform substantially with exhibits on file with the department of community development, as modified by the following conditions. 2. Construction of a portion of said project shall commence within one year from the date of final approval unless an extension of time is granted; otherwise said approval shall become null , void and of no effect whatsoever. 3. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein which are in addition to all municipal ordinances and state and federal statutes now in force, or which hereafter may be in force. 4. Prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contemplated by this approval , the applicant shall first obtain permits and/or clearance from the following agencies: Riverside County Department of Health Palm Desert Architectural Commission City Fire Marshal Coachella Valley Water District Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to the' department of building and safety at the time of issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. 5. Applicant agrees to join an assessment district and contribute reasonable assessment fees for future improvements to Cook Street. 6. Applicant to pay applicable fees for Art in Public Places program. 7. Applicant to pay applicable lizard fees. 8. No residential trash trucks to use Lennon Place. 9. Landscaping to be upgraded throughout the site and include interior landscaping where adjacent to private property. 10. Applicant shall pay drainage fees in effect as the time of application, if said fees have not already been paid to the city as part of a previous approvals on this site. 3 a PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1263 i 11 . Applicant shall pay appropriate City of Palm Desert signalization fees in effect at the time of application. I Department of Public Works: i I . Complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the city engineer for checking and approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. The engineer shall submit "as-built" plans prior to the acceptance of the improvements by the city. i 2. All private driveways and parking lots shall be inspected by the engineering department and a standard inspection fee shall be paid prior to grading permit issuance. i 3. Landscaping maintenance on Lennon Place and Corporate Way shall be provided by the property owner. l 4. Complete grading plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the city engineer for checking and approval prior to issuance of any permits. 5. Offsite improvement plans to be approved by public works department and a I surety posted to guarantee the required offsite improvements prior to grading permit issuance. 6. Size, number and location of driveways to public works specifications with only one driveway approach from Lennon Place to be allowed to service this property. 7. Original conditions apply as per Planning Commission Resolution for Precise Plan 16-83. B. Any and all offsite improvements shall be preceded by the approval of plans and the issuance of valid encroachment permits by the department of public works. City Fire Marshal : 1 . Additional fire protection requirements may be necessary when the j applicant submits specific plans for consideration and approval . 2. All buildings over 5000 square feet require an approved fire sprinkler system. /tm h 4 jlll � I i , • ,: . ��:� GE.J.-._T i i i l_� CO, cs C hen recorded re' n to: Cook Hovley Streu_ Associates m a E S^ �/ 73-640 E1 Paseo coIoalm Desert, CA 92260 4 W O N it a7 SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR ~ LLi i 00 \. C RECORDER' S USE W a AMENDMENT TO DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS OF CORPORATE CENTRE AT PALM DESERT THIS AMENDMENT is made this 19th day of February, 1986 by COOK HOVLEY STREET ASSOCIATES, A Minnesota General Partnership and COOK CORPORATE CENTER, A California General Partnership, as t� owners of more than seventy-five percent (75%) of the total l� square feet of real estate described in the Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions dated July 22 , 1985 and ,\ recorded in the offices of the County Recorder of Riverside County on July 23 , 1985 at document number 166213 , and previously recorded as document number 161610, hereinafter called the "CC '& R' s" . W I T N E S S E T H: WHEREAS, in order to correct an error in the legal description attached to the CC & R' s as Exhibit "A" , it is necessary to amend the CC & R' s to eliminate Parcel 17 of Parcel Map 17452 from the burden of the CC & R' s; and WHEREAS, the undersigned, as owners of more than seventy-five ( 75%) of the total square footage of the real estate covered by the CC & R' s, .may pursuant to Section 5 . 2 of the CC & R' s amend the same, which amendment is hereby approved by Declarant COOK HOVLEY STREET ASSOCIATES, A Minnesota General Partnership. 1 • of NOW THEREFORE, Declarant and the undersigned hereby c , make the following amendment to the CC & R' s: co C1 1. In order to correct the legal description attached to the CC & R' s as Exhibit "A" , the following legal description is substituted therefore in place of the legal description set forth on Exhibit "A" to the CC & R' s to wit: Parcels 1 through 16 and Parcels 18 through 33 inclusive, together with Lot "F" of Parcel Map 17452 as shown by Parcel Map on file in Book 130, Pages 14 through 17 inclusive of Parcel Maps , records of verside County. The effect of the amendment set forth above is to [eliminate Lot 17 from the legal description set forth on xhibit "A" to the said CC & R' s . 2. In all other respects the said CC & R' s shall remain the same and no further amendment is intended nor shall same be inferred from this document other than the elimination of Parcel 17 from the burden of the CC & R' s. THIS AMENDMENT is made and entered into by Declarant and the undersigned as of the day and year first above written. COOK HOVLEY STREET ASSOCIATES, A Minnesota General `Partnership By GEORGE P. BERK Y, Managing Pa er COOK CORPORATE CENTER, A California General �ar,=E rrship By ` ROBERT RISHWAIN, Managing Partner STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) SS TV COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) On February 19, 1986, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared GEORGE P. BERKEY, known to me to be the Managing Partner of the partnership that executed the within instrument, and acknowledge to me that such partnership executed the same. Witness my hand and official seal. OFFICIAL SEAL • SUSAN CHESTER Notary Public-California LOS ANGELES COUNTY c My Comm.Exp.Jan.28,19M STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) SS COUNTY OF On February ,:(p , 1986 , before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared ROBERT RISHWAIN, personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the Managing Partner of the partnership that executed the within instrument, and acknowledge to me that such partnership executed the same. Witness my hand and official seal. AFPIGIALSEAL r CAROI_YN QUIJRLVO NOTARY PUSLIC-CALIFORNIA SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY ily COM W$$tatt EYARE$DCI 26.1lSS v� �JNTY OF RIVERSIDE - DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 3575-I I.MSTREET MOLL (POST OFFICE BOX 1370)- RIVERSIDE, CJL 92502 EMMU J.G.On..MI 7UPW� Di t d NeaX� July 21 , 1987 T , Mr. Ray Burke, Manager $�:� �' Palm Desert Disposal =� Palm Desert, CA NOV 1 7 1987 _ RE: PROPOSED EXPANSION OF FACILITIES COMMUII"I' DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OP PALM DESERT Dear Mr. Burke: This is to inform you that the Department of Health, Environmental Health Services supports your efforts of expanding your facilities to accommodate the growth needs to your refuse collection company. Your past cooperation with this Department and eagerness to comply with all requests indicates the dedication your company has to environmental quality matters and service to the public. The maintenance of your vehicles and cleanliness of your operation has been found to be in compliance with the provisions of Title 14 California Administrative Code and County Ordinance 513 regulating the collection, transportation and disposal of trash and garbage in Riverside County. We appreciate the positive working relationship with your company which assures the communities and public we both serve the highest quality refuse disposal services. Very truly yours, 1� "Fanning Wealth John M. Faanning Director, Environmen JMF:RVS:jwh 4•p!Jlp CITY OF PALM DESERT DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission DATE: November 17, 1987 CASE NO: PP 16-83 Amendment #2 REQUEST: Palm Desert Disposal requests approval of a 3.5 acre expansion to a parking and storage area and a 5400 square foot second story addition to an existing structure. The project site is located on the south side of Lennon Place between Eclectic and approximately 500 feet east of Corporate Way. APPLICANT: Palm Desert Disposal Howard Parcel ] 41-575 Eclectic Street 4815 Main Street Palm Desert, CA 92260, Yorba Linda, CA 92686 I. DISCUSSION: A. HISTORY: Palm Desert Disposal located their operation and headquarters in this industrially zoned and developed area in 1983. Additional land was acquired for future expansion, a total of seven additional acres, were acquired. Earlier this year a precise plan application requesting expansion onto these seven acres was requested. The request was denied. The applicant has filed a request to expand his storage area onto about 3.6 acres. B. DESCRIPTION OF SURROUNDING AREA: The site is surrounded by service industrial zoning. North of the site, across Lennon Place, five office industrial projects have been approved. South of the site are a vacant lot, armored transport service facility, a cement truck washout area, two vacant lots and a mini-warehouse project. C. ZONING AND PROPOSED USE: The site is zoned S. I . (service industrial ) and has been so zoned since its annexation into the city. Section 25.34. 100 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code sets forth the purpose of the S. I , zone. it states in part: "The intent and purpose of the service industrial district is to allow for the manufacture, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT PP 16-83 AMENDMENT #2 NOVEMBER 17, 1987 distribution, and service thereof of products intended for local usage within Palm Desert, its sphere of influence and surrounding cove communities." The service area of Palm Desert Disposal is principally the communities of Palm Desert, Rancho Mirage, Cathedral City, La Quinta, Indian Wells, Indio and unincorporated areas in the Coachella Valley. It may be argued that the service area is no larger and in many instances smaller then that of other firms located in the S. I . zone. Section 25.34.020 Permitted Uses for the service industrial zone lists the following: 1 . Equipment maintenance and storage facilities. 2. Maintenance facilities (bulk laundering, janitorial , etc. ) 3. Mortuaries. 4. Pest control facilities. 5. Preparation of foodstuffs (no processing) e.g. baking, bottling, etc. 6. Production of home and office decor accessories. 7. Public utility and public service facilities. 8. Support facilities for local construction, renovation and installation of related equipment. 9. Uses customarily related to any of the uses listed in this section. 10. Completely screened vehicle service and storage facilities. 11 . Warehouse or storage facilities. The proposed use could fall under any one of six uses listed as permitted in the zone. I . Equipment maintenance and storage facilities. 2. Maintenance facilities (bulk laundering, janitorial , etc. ) 7. Public utility and public service facilities. 8. Support facilities for local construction, renovation and installation of related equipment. 9. Uses customarily related to any of the uses listed in this section. 10. Completely screened vehicle service and storage facilities. The applicant proposes to expand his existing maintenance and storage facilities which were previously approved by the city. The use can be categorized as a public utility in that it is franchised and regulated by the city. 2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT PP 16-83 AMENDMENT #2 NOVEMBER 17, 1987 Items to be stored on the site include portable toilets, construction trash bins, fencing, barricades and other things used by the construction industry. Finally, trash and refuse collection is a use that is customarily related to any of the other uses identified as permitted. The question, therefore, is not whether the requested expansion is a permitted use--for clearly it is, as setforth in the code adopted in 1975 and reaffirmed when the applicant's present operations were approved in 1983. The issue is one of how the proposed facility is designed and does that design meet the required findings setforth in chapter 25.73 Precise Plan of the Palm Desert Municipal Code. Those findings are setforth in section 25. 73 . 013 approval or rejection considerations: "A . . . . consideration shall be given and restrictions shall be imposed to the extent necessary, in view of the size and shape of the parcel and the present and proposed zoning and use of the subject property and the surrounding property, to permit the same degree of enjoyment of the subject property, but subject the same degree of protection of adjoining properties, as would be accorded in normal circumstances by the standard restrictions imposed by this chapter. The standard restrictions imposed in the various zones by this chapter. . .are intended as minimum restrictions necessary in normal circumstances to prevent substantial depreciation of property values in the vicinity, unreasonable interference with the use and enjoyment of property in the vicinity by the occupants thereof for lawful purposes and the protection of the public peace, health, safety and - general welfare. "Normal circumstances" are extended to refer the case of a permitted case upon a lot of a normal size and shape surrounded by property in the same zone as the lot in question." The proposed use is a permitted use as has been stated earlier. The site is question exceeds the lot specifications in the S. I . zone, which requires a minimum lot area of 20,000 square feet with minimum depth and width of 100 feet; the parcels in question are 165.29 and 3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT PP 16-83 AMENDMENT #2 NOVEMBER 17, 1987 170.81 feet wide respectively, thus have a combined width of 336 feet and their depth is 463.90. The proposed perimeter screening exceeds the requirements of the S. I . zone setforth in section 25.34. 170 which requires a minimum wall height between five and seven feet, the proposed slumpstone exterior wall will be eight feet in height. In addition, views into the yard at the entry shall be screened by a planter and eight foot wall located in the yard approximately twenty feet from the driveway. The plan also creates 93 employee parking stalls in the expansion area and places the trash truck parking in their existing area, thus reducing traffic on Lennon Place. D. PREVIOUS APPLICATIONS: PP 16-83 amendment #1 which was denied included a parcel which was located in the Corporate Way Property Owners Association area. This application restricts the project to the two parcels immediately adjacent to the existing Palm Desert Disposal Operation and were taken out of the property owner's CC&R's by the group which developed the Corporate Center. There was at that time discussion between the applicant and the property owner' s association relating to the question of permissibility of the proposed use, and this is a question which these two groups must resolve. The new application reduces the area of the proposed expansion by 1 . 16 acres and eliminates the question of permissibility and CC&R regulations. During the first hearings questions were raised relating to odors and health impacts. The present operations have received total clearance from the Riverside County Health Department. The question of traffic generation was also raised during the first application. As stated previously, the streets can accommodate the traffic generated by this industrial use. In addition, the dividing of the areas and entrances between employee vehicles, truck parking and storage assures that there will not be an undue concentration at any given point in time of traffic generated by this use either in its present or expanded condition. The issue of aesthetics were also discussed previously. The applicant has been required to increase his landscaping throughout the site and completely screen the storage area from street visibility. 4 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT PP 16-83 AMENDMENT #2 NOVEMBER 17, 1987 E. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: During the previous application requests for a complete environmental impact report were made. It was staff's recommendation that a negative declaration of environmental impact met the legal and intended requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act. Staff recommends that a negative declaration of environmental impact be certified on this application. The basis of this recommendation is the initial study hereto attached and the fact that there is no evidence that the project could have a significant adverse impact on the environment that has not been mitigated by the conditions of approval identified in the initial study. 11. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the following: A. Adoption of the findings; B. Adoption of Planning Commission Resolution No. approving PP 16-83 Amendment #2, subject to conditions. 111. ATTACHMENTS: A. Draft resolution. 8. Initial study. C. Comments from city departments and other agencies. D. Negative declaration. E. Legal notice. F. Plans and ex bits. Prepared by J Reviewed and Approved by /tm 5 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PRECISE PLAN OF DESIGN AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT TO ALLOW A 3.58 ACRE EXPANSION TO A PARKING AND STORAGE AREA AND A SECOND STORY ADDITION TO AN EXISTING STRUCTURE LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF LENNON PLACE BETWEEN ECLECTIC AND CORPORATE WAY. CASE NO: PP 16-83 AMENDMENT #2 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 17th day of November, 1987, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider the request of PALM DESERT DISPOSAL for approval of a negative declaration and precise plan of design for the above mentioned project; and WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedure for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 80-89", in that the director of community develop- ment has determined that the project will not have a significant adverse impact on the environment and a negative declaration has been prepared, and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said planning commission did find the following facts and reasons to exit to justify granting approval of said precise plan: 1 . The precise plan is consistent with the intent and purpose of the service industrial zone and the Palm Desert General Plan. 2. The use is specifically permitted by section 25.34.020 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code. 3. The project will not endanger the public peace, health, safety or general welfare. 4. The use has previously been determined to be acceptable at this location. 5. Since the time of the original plan approval office/industrial projects have been approved in the area. The project may be detrimental to some extent on property values but not substantially while the use will be low in terms of marking which could benefit the area if parking problems occur. 6. The facility is under county health permits which protects the health concerns etc. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: I . That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the commission in this case. 2. That approval of Precise Plan 16-83 Amendment #2 is hereby granted for reasons subject to the attached conditions. 3. That a negative declaration of environmental impact is hereby approved and said negative declaration and initial study, therefore, are attached hereto as exhibit "A" and made a part hereof. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 17th day of November, 1987, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT'.- ABSTAIN: RICHARD ERWOOD, Chairman ATTEST: RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary /tm 2 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO. PP 16-83 Amendment #2 Department of Community Development: 1 . The development of the property shall conform substantially with exhibits on file with the department of community development, as modified by the following conditions. 2. Construction of a portion of said project shall commence within one year from the date of final approval unless an extension of time is granted; otherwise said approval shall become null , void and of no effect whatsoever. 3. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein which are in addition to all municipal ordinances and state and federal statutes now in force, or which hereafter may be in force. 4. Prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contemplated by this approval , the applicant shall first obtain permits and/or clearance from the following agencies: Riverside County Department of Health Palm Desert Architectural Commission City Fire Marshal Coachella Valley Water District Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to the department of building and safety at the time of issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. 5. Applicant agrees to join an assessment district and contribute reasonable assessment fees for future improvements to Cook Street. 6. Applicant to pay applicable fees for Art in Public Places program. 7. Applicant to pay applicable lizard fees. 8. No residential trash trucks to use Lennon Place. 9. Landscaping to be upgraded throughout the site and include interior landscaping where adjacent to private property. 10. Applicant shall pay drainage fees in effect as the time of application, if said fees have not already been paid to the city as part of a previous approvals on this site. 3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11 . Applicant shall pay appropriate City of Palm Desert s i gna I i zat 1 on fees in effect at the time of application. Department of Public Works: 1 . Complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the city engineer for checking and approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. The engineer shall submit "as-built" plans prior to the acceptance of the improvements by the city. 2. All private driveways and parking lots shall be inspected by the engineering department and a standard inspection fee shall be paid prior to grading permit issuance. 3. Landscaping maintenance on Lennon Place and Corporate Way shall be provided by the property owner. A. Complete grading plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the city engineer for checking and approval prior to issuance of any permits. 5. Offsite improvement plans to be approved by public works department and a surety posted to guarantee the required offsite improvements prior to grading permit issuance. 6. Size, number and location of driveways to public works specifications with only one driveway approach from Lennon Place to be allowed to service this property. 7. Original conditions apply as per Planning Commission Resolution for Precise Plan 16-83. 8. Any and all offsite improvements shall be preceded by the approval of plans and the issuance of valid encroachment permits by the department of public works. City Fire Marshal : 1 . Additional fire protection requirements may be necessary when the applicant submits specific plans for consideration and approval . 2. All buildings over 5000 square feet require an approved fire sprinkler system. Am 4 CASE; INO I"NVTg0N4SE14TAL SERVICES DEFT . INITIAL STUDY ENVI:ROI4B4ENTAL EVALUATIOI! CHECKLIST' NOTE: The availability of data necessary to address the topics listed below shall form the basis of a decision as to whether the application is considered complete for purposes of environmental assessment. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers , possible mitigation measures and comments are provided on attached sheets) . Yes Maybe No 1 . Earth. Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in x geologic substructures? b. Disruptions , displacements , compaction, or �( overcovering of the soil ? c. Change in topography or ground surface relief I features? d. The destruction, covering ., or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Any increase in wind or• water erosion of soils , either on or off the site? 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors? c . Alteration of air movement , moisture , or temperature , or• any change in climate , �y either locally or regionally? /A 2 Yes Maybe No 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements? b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of — — surface water runoff? c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? — — d. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? e. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or with- drawals , or through interception, of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? f. Reduction in the amount of water other- wise available for public water supplies? _ 4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of plants (including trees , shrubs , grass , and crops )? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or endangered species of plants? c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area , or in a barrier to the normal X replenishment of existing species? 5. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds , land animals including reptiles , or insects)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, ` rare, or endangered species of animals? u c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? _ d. Deterioration to existing wildlife habitat? I� 3. Yes Maybe No 6. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a . Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? 41 b. Depletion of any non-renewable natural resource? X 7. Energy. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? _ b. Demand upon existing sources of energy, or re- quire the development of new sources of K energy? 8. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, pesticides , oil , chemicals , or radiation) in �1 the event of an accident or upset conditions? _ '\ 9. Economic Loss . Will the proposal result in: a . A change in the value of property and r � improvements endangered by flooding? _ b. A change in the value of property and improvements exposed to geologic hazards beyond accepted community risk standards? _ 10. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels to the point at which accepted community noise and vibration levels are exceeded? 11 . Land Use. Will the proposal result in the a t-l—eration of the present developed or planned land use of an area? 12. Open SYdce. Will the proposal lead to a decrease in the amount of designated open space? 13. Pcjulation. Will the proposal result in: a. Alteration of the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of the City? �\ b. Change in the population distribution by age , income, religion, racial , or- ethnic group, occupational class , household type? 5. Yes nbe No 18. Public Fiscal Balance. Will the proposal result in a ret change in government fiscal flow (revenues less operating expenditures and annualized capital `expenditures)? 19. Utilities . Will the proposal result in a need for new systems , or alterations to the following utilities : a . Power or natural gas? b. Communications system? — k c. Water? — — d. Sewer or septic tanks? k e. Storm water drainage? f. Solid waste and disposal ? X 20. Human Health. Will the proposal result in: — a. The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? b. A change in the level of cormwnity health care provided? SG 21 . Social Services . Will the proposal result in an increased demand for provision of general social services? 22. Aesthetics . Will the proposal result in: a. Obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public? b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? c. Lessening of the overall neighborhood (or area ) attractiveness , pleasantness , and uniqueness? 23. Limit and Glare. Will the proposal produce new Ti-git or glare? 24. ArcheolDr cal/Historical . Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or, historical site, structure, Object , or building) — �/ 4. Yes Maybe No 14. Employment. Will the proposal result in additional new long-term jobs provided , or a change in the number and per cent employed, unemployed , and underemployed? 15. Housing. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in number and per cent of housing units by type (price or rent range, zoning category, owner-occupied and rental , etc. ) relative to demand or to number of families in various income classes in the City? _ — b. Impacts on existing housing or creation of a 1. demand for additional housing? I'. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in : a . Generation of additional vehicular movement? b. Effects on existing parking facilities , or demand for new parking? c. Impact. upon existing transportation systems? — d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? e. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists, or pedestrians? 17 . Public Services . Will the proposal have an effect upon , or result in a need for, new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas : a . Fire protection? SC b. Police protection? x c. Schools? d. Parks or other recreational facilities? e. Maintenance of public facilities , including roads? f. Other governmental services? _ k 6. Yes MLbe No 25. Mandatory Findings of Significance. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment or to curtail v the diversity in the environment? I� b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future. ) - X c. Does the project have impacts which are indi- vidually limited , but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small , but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant. ) d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings , either directly or indirectly? �1 1 Initial Study Prepared By: __ a_N..b._�f ___ INITIAL STUDY EXPLANATION OF INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST CASE NO. PP 16-83 AMENDMENT #2 1 . EARTH a. The project will not result in any major excavation or grading activity that will reach the geologic substructure of the site. b. There will be compaction of soils, which are required as part of the city's construction ordinance relating to paved areas for parking and storage. Compaction is a normal part of any construction activity and does not result in any adverse impact to the environment. (Department of Public Works conditions 1 , 4) C. The topography of the site is relatively flat, there maybe minor changes •on the site to meet city drainage requirement. This will be further discussed under item 3. (Department of Public Works conditions 1 , 2 and 4) d. As stated previously, the site is flat and, therefore, does not contain any unique or physical features. e. If anything, the construction of the wall and paving will reduce wind and water erosion. However, it should be noted that this has not been a problem in the area. 2. AIR a. This is a service industry which responds to demands for an increase in service, which is generated by growth occurring outside of its control . Any significant reduction in air quality is thus generated by the developments that cause the need for trash disposal and other such services rather than the services themselves. In. The activity proposed will not create objectionable odors. If there are odor problems, they are referred to the appropriate agencies for resolution. C. The project is located in an already developed area and encompasses in total only approximately seven acres and, therefore, could not impact air movements or any other climatic conditions. 3. WATER a. If necessary to meet city drainage requirements to protect adjacent properties, the course of water failing on the sight may be altered. This would result in a positive rather than adverse impact on the environment. (Department of Public Works conditions I , 2, and 4) b. The rate of ground absorption will be reduced as the amount of area paved increases and the natural area decreases. This will not result in a significant adverse impact on the environment that cannot INITIAL STUDY PP 16-83 AMENDMENT #2 NOVEMBER 17, 1987 be mitigated because the city's drainage requirements, fees and drainage projects financed by those fees are intended to handle the increased runoff created by this or any development. There is a specific department of community development condition requiring the payment of drainage fees and approval of grading plans. (Department of Community Development condition 10) C. The project site is not subject to flooding. d. The site does not contain any ground water. e. The project will not add to or withdraw from any ground water. As stated previously, none of the activity either during construction or operation will impact or touch the geologic substructure. f. Public water supplies are not impacted by this development. 4. PLANT LIFE a. In order to complete the landscaping needed to meet city requirements, new plants will be introduced on site. However, these plants and shrubs have been introduced into the area previously. b. The site does not contain any rare or endangered species of flora. C. See item 4a. 5. ANIMAL LIFE a-d The site does not serve as habitat for any known animals. Development in the area has already eliminated its usefulness as a wildlife habitat. The applicant is required to pay nearly $1800 as required by the fringe-toed lizard mitigation plan. Though no fringe-toed lizards have been identified on the site, the area is covered by the plan and the applicant will pay the required fee as conditioned in the resolution. (Department of Community Development condition 10) . 6. NATURAL RESOURCES a-d The use of natural resources will be minimal and limited to the ingredients normally found in paving material . 2 INITIAL STUDY PP 16-83 AMENDMENT #2 NOVEMBER 17, 1987 7. ENERGY a-b The project is to develop a storage area, and as such will use minimal amounts of energy after its completion. 8. RISK OF UPSET No chemicals or explosives will be stored on the site. 9. ECONOMIC LOSS a-b The project site is not in an area endangered by flooding. Development of the property will increase its value above that of vacant land. However, the project is not subject to geologic risks beyond accepted community standards, and outside of the wall and second story stucco structure, there are no improvements seriously exposed to geologic hazards. 10. NOISE The project will not increase ambient noise levels beyond the acceptable CNEL. In addition, the dispersal of vehicles will result in a lessening of any noise increase at a given area. The activity is also completely screened by an eight foot masonry wall , which will keep noises from going outside of the project area boundaries. Noise generated by large trucks are to be expected in the industrial area, and their concentration in that area is expected and these areas are established to concentrate industrial development and keep such noises outside of residential and commercial areas. In any event, the noise level of the activity proposed meets the requirements of section 25.34. 130 of the city zoning ordinance. If anytime the noise standards setforth on section 25.34. 180 are exceeded, appropriate legal action can be taken to curtail the activity. (Department of Community Development condition 3) 1l . LAND USE The area is zoned and has been planned for industrial uses. 12. OPEN SPACE The site is not designated for open space use. 3 INITIAL STUDY PP 16-83 AMENDMENT #2 NOVEMBER 17, 1987 13. POPULATION a-b The project is the result of an increase in population that has and will continue to occur. The project does not impact the area's population in terms of its distribution of socio-economic makeup. 14. EMPLOYMENT The proposal will not result in new jobs. However, the expanded growth which has generated the expansion of this service industry may result in new jobs created in this industry. 15. HOUSING The project is a small expansion totaling three acres; thus it will not have significant impact on population, employment or housing. In addition, the city's housing element of the general plan addresses the future housing needs of the city and programs and projects to meet those needs have been established. 16. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION a. Additional vehicular movements will be generated but these are movements that have been contemplated by the planned circulation system in the area. In addition, as stated previously the division of the different types of vehicular movements assures that they will be dispersed, thus making the impact on any area minimal . Furthermore, the applicant will be required to pay appropriate signalization fees to offset the impact of their proposal on the city's circulation system. Therefore, no unmitigated significant adverse traffic impacts are caused by the project. In addition, to join a Cook Street assessment district is required. (Department of Community Development conditions 5 and 11 ) . b. New parking is being created and access facilitated the planned project. c, d, and e The streets are designed to accommodate projected traffic, sidewalks are present where required and bicyclists are discouraged from riding through industrial areas. 17. PUBLIC SERVICES a-f No new governmental services, or expansion of current services, will result from this proposal . 4 INITIAL STUDY PP 16-83 AMENDMENT #2 NOVEMBER 17, 1987 18. PUBLIC FISCAL BALANCE On a one-on-one basis industrial developments have traditionally generated greater revenues than expenditures for government. The applicant is under a franchise agreement with the city which will assure that a positive rather than negative fiscal balance is maintained. 19. UTILITIES All utility purveyors are aware of the project and all have indicated an ability to serve the project. 20. HUMAN HEALTH a-b The entire operation is monitored by the Riverside County Health Department. This project expanding office and storage area will not impact human health. (Department of Community Development condition 4) 21 . SOCIAL SERVICES No state or local social service agency will be required to render services as the result of this project. 22. AESTHETICS a-c The project will be completely screened, meet or exceed all zoning requirements and the requirements of the Palm Desert Architectural Commission; as such it will not result in any significant adverse aesthetic impacts on the environment. (Department of Community Development conditions 1 and 4) 23. LIGHT AND GLARE Security lighting is all that may be added to the new area. Such lighting requires a lighting plan to assure that a spillover does not occur. (Department of Community Development condition 3) 24. ARCHEOLOGICAL/HISTORICAL Throughout the development of the entire industrial area there has not been any evidence found to date that the site has any archeological or historical significance. 5 INITIAL STUDY PP 16-83 AMENDMENT #2 NOVEMBER 17, 1987 25. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a. Based upon the review of items I through 24 it is concluded that the project will not potentially degrade the environment. b. See 25 a. C. As stated, the project will not have any significant, unmitigated adverse environmental impacts. d. For all the reasons stated. 6 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 Pursuant to Title 14, Division 6, Article 7, Section 15083, of the California Administrative Code. ,h NEGATIVE DECLARATION CASE NO: PP 16-83 Amendment #2 f APPLICANT/PROJECT SPONSOR: Palm Desert Disposal 41-575 Eclectic Street Palm Desert, CA 92260, PROJECT DESCRIPTION/LOCATION: A 3 .5 acre expansion to a parking and storage area and a 5400 square foot second story addition to an existing structure on the south side of Lennon Place between Eclectic and approximately 500 feet east of Corporate Way. The Director of the Department of Community Development, City of Palm Desert, California, has found that the described project will not have a significant effect on the environment. A copy of the Initial Study has been attached to document the reasons in support of this finding. Mitigation measures, if any, included in the project to avoid potentially significant effects, may also be Y found attached. y P ---------------------------------------- RAMON A. DIAZ DATE DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT /tm �1 A �I ��llLis"T OO j1 J_;�.3�_C,7i1iL1 .LU���C'�-;7Sim�b 73-5101.1111U WAI111K,LAIN[-,PALtd UESEIIT,CALIrC?HF1A922GO IELEI'11UNE (619) 346-UGI I _--- Octohcr 29, 1907 CITY OF PALM DESERT .. LEGAL NOTICE CASE NO. PP 16-83 Amendment g2 NOTICE IS HERFDY GIVEN that a put,ljr. hearino will be held before the Palm Pesert Plgnning Commission to consider a request by HOWARD PARCELL (for Palm Desert Disposal) for approval of a 3.5 acre expansion to a parking and storage area and a secnnd story addition to an existing structure (9400 square feet) for a 4rnsh hauling and dispo.al company with a negative declaration of environmental impact located on the south side of Lennon Place between Eclectic and approximately 500 feet east of Corporate Way, more particularly described as: APN 624-290-D38 (existing) NOTE: the expanded area is in addition to applicant's existing 3.20 acre headquarters area (total 6.70 +- acres). i o I I 5AII1 puhlic hen?ing will he held on Tuesday, November 17, 1987, at 7:00 P.M. in the Council L'.hamher at the Palm Desert Civic Center, 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Ilesert, California, at which time and pinre all interested persons are invited to att:and and he heard. If you challenge the proposed actions in court, yrnu may he limited to rnlsinn only those Issues you or someone else raised art the Public hearing rlosr,ribed in this notice, or in written correspondenQe delivered to the planning commission (or city council) at, or prior to, the Public hearing. PIIHLISII: Desert Post RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary , 11-06-87 Palm Desert Planning Commission GEORUE BERKEY & ASSOCIATES, INC. COACHELLA VALLEY REAL ESTATE SINCE 1946 November 13, 1987 GEORGE V. BERKEY GEORGE P. BERKEY HAZEL I.WELLS N.ALAN WILLIAMS DUKE BAKER MA LEY , �ti DICK BAXLEY �9d � � NOV 1 3 1987 Mr. Ramon Diaz COM. MutoY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT City of Palm Desert CITY of PALM DESERT Palm Desert, CA 92260 Dear Ray, We have reviewed the new plans submitted by Palm Desert Disposal. We are in agreement with them as long as they plant the same 36" box Australian Willow on Lennon Place along the existing wall for additional screening. The trees there now do not provide any screening. It also seems appropriate to plant them to also tie in with the plan that shows them on the new addition. It appears that approxi- mately 10 trees would be needed on the old wall. Screening is the issue. So with the oleanders on the west wall and the additional 36" box trees on Lennon, we would be in favor of the disposal's plan. Sincerely, George P. Berkey GPB:es 41-555 COOK STREET, SUITE 200 • PALM DESERT. CALIFORNIA 92260 • 619/346-6677 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 Pursuant. to Title 14, Division 6, Article 7, Section 15083, of the California Administrative Code. NEGATIVE DECLARATION CASE NO: PP 16-83 Amendment #2 APPLICANT/PROJECT SPONSOR: Palm Desert Disposal 41-575 Eclectic Street Palm Desert, CA 92260 PROJECT DESCRIPTION/LOCATION: A 3 .5 acre expansion to a parking and storage area and a, 5400 square foot second story addition to an existing structure on the south side of Lennon Place between Eclectic and approximately 500 feet east of Corporate Way. The Director of the Department of Community Development, City of Palm Desert, California, has found that the described project will not have a significant effect on the environment. A copy of the Initial Study has been attached to document the reasons in support of this finding. Mitigation measures, if any, included in the project to avoid potentially significant effects, may also be found attached. ---------------------------------------- RAMON A. DIAZ DATE DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT /tm )G p 2 © USCG F ��05 73-510 Fred Waring Dr., Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 _ P�REGISE PLAN QA7auC H F-CE�N : Dept.of Planning and Comm.Pity, Pie/velopment C'0011*11 i! ELU",� ri DEPARTMENT CITY V PALM DESERT ,, F �141�� 3 AQ -fir F� Appiicant (p:ease print)A•815 Merlµ � Teieonone Honing Aatlress Yorei^ Woo,. CA . City state zip-was REQUEST! (Descrtte specific nature of aPProval rsQuested). r11oN 1µo SrIY) -r grics S01L'c'1M'C exv'Ad4skol OF FA1z1=10 pcGlu 71 LaL6�! i ng 0f_ MASoIsgy scar wAtA-- apkVIMCr 'f VArv1 A& PRCPERTY DESCRIPTION: ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. �G�1' v ` v '�. &14^ `1o4 e �* &24-290,44 - EXISTING ZONING Property Owner Authorization The unaersignea states that they are the owner(s) of the property asscribea herein and hereby give author- jzatton for the filing at this applicatlon. XSignatura Date grea Ant absarvmg ittq City at Poem Desert of all liabilities remove to any aeaa restrictions. 1 DO BY MY SIGNATURE ON THIS AGREEMENT, Absolve the Ciy of Palm Desert at ail liabilities regarding any deed restricttons that may be applicable to the property described herein. Signature Date Applicants Signature ',,signature I, (FOR STAFF USE ONLY) Environmental Status. Accepted by: ❑ Ministerial Act E.A.No. M ❑ Categorical Exemption CISE C1V0a ❑ Negative Declaration ❑ Other Reference Case No. Ef1Y�N0eYaYT1L SUY�C£J/ire 9Hr-e2 I EXPLANATK)N OF ITE S) I THROUGH 10 1. Aoclicant's Environmental Information Form The Environmental Information form must be submitted with the filing o application, so that an environmental determination can be made. Shou Environmental Impact Report be required, the application will not be accept . processed until one has been submitted. 2. Filinz Fee Resolution 79-7 of the City of Palm Desert Municipal Code requires a filin dependent upon the type of development. 3. Application The attached application must be completed as indicated on the form authorization of legal owner to process the Precise Plan. (Notarization) 4. Sucoortine Statements This is to show justification for this application. 5. Legal Description Application will not be considered complete until legal description is approv the Environmental Services Department. (The information from deed of r will suffice) 6. 300-Foot Radius Mao The 300-foot radius map must be prepared to the attached specifications folded to "" x 13" maximum size. 7. Prooerty Owner's List The property owner's list must be typed in duplicate on gummed labels available in the Department of Environmental Services. This list must have the names and mailing addresses of all property owners within or partially within the 300-foot radius map. It must be prepared from the latest equalized assessment rolls of the Riverside County Assessor. All names must be numbered to correspond wit' numbers on the required radius map. The 3rd list does not have to be on gur labels. 8. Precise Plan Precise Plan drawings must be prepared to the following specifications and f to maximum 8Yz" x 13" size. 1. Format A. Title as follows: Name, address, and phone number of applicant. INS T RL'CTICNS FOR FILING A PRECISE PLAN B. North arrow and scale (drawings shall be oriented to the rerth and shall not be less than 1" = 30" in scale, unless approval has been . . granted by the Environmental Services Department to reduce the scale. C. Legend for the plan shall include all the items in Section IV. II. Parcel Specifications A. Fully dimensioned subject parcel boundaries. B. Abutting street information: 1) Name of street(s) Z) Existing and proposed street width(s) and centerlines 3) Parkway width(s) 4) Sidewalk dimensions 5) Access and driveway dimensions 6) Median strips and traffic islands C. Name, location and width of closest intersecting street. . D. Existing contours and water courses, for subject property and adjacent property. E. Location and dimensions of all existing or proposed easements. III. Pr000sed Development and Modification A. All existing and proposed structures and physical features. B. Exterior building dimensions. C. Setbacks with dimensions. D. Distances between buildings. E. Height of structures. F. Treatment of open spaces, including landscaped areas. G. Walls and fences. H. Trash areas. I. Use of building. J. Parkway trees. K. Parking area INSTRUCTICNS FOR FILING A PRECISE PLAN 1. Layout and dimensions of all parking stalls. 2. Dimensions of all access ways, turnaround areas, driveways, alleys, and walks. 3. Off-street loading space and facilities. 4. Surface type. 5. Screening and landscaping (including curbs). L. Proposed grading. IV. Mao Leeend A. Net acreage of parcel. B. Gross floor area for all buildings. C. Percentage of land covered by structures. D. Number of permanent seats, square footage dwelling units (including size of each unit) or whichever is applicable in the computation of the parking requirements. E. Proposed off-street parking. F. Required off-street parking. G. Percentage of landscaping for-total site. 9. Elevation Plans (tvoical Structure) Elevation plans of front, sides, and rear of the proposed developments shall be submitted together with the application. Plans must be drawn to scale and should be large enough to be used for display purposes. Prints to be folded to Uz" x 13" maximum size. CO Co'""SC iUQ _ F'CRI �i _ =CRF _ 3 SAN PED**� 5T, }. 5AWA ST. O 8 + 3 O y6 I CS ., c CIO n r,. �a MO-N �oF- LANF = O RUSSELL_ AVM , T � • Q- G:I:RG;; 1 i Lu J iIme = I .. it.j =; L moo.• K Z-Y i c C'v1,+Z n L:.�' `X FAFL ''' AC�PIr,� ' CZR=ICA i ION OF PROPHR7t C47NER5 LIST (Tc de filled cut by applicant) CITY OF PALM DESERT Department of Environ mental 'services 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, CA 92260 Subje-_t• ��t-M .-�-/�•�E''�T 'plS�+oSM� Gentlemen: 1, tT�W, TAu— do hereby certify, under penalty of perjury, that the attached list sets fomh the names and addresses of the following persons as they appear on the last equalized assessment roll of the Riverside County Assessor. Sincerely, It�WAVO CASe�-t_ Printed Name _ 4 te) Mind ter: : YomA L14PA Gs. ' ` 2-to et2 Accress 11+_ -1113'l� Phone Numcer Dated a 21 in the City of California. 5ignature 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 October 29, 1987 CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE CASE NO. PP 16-83 Amendment #2 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by HOWARD PARCELL (for Palm Desert Disposal ) for approval of a 3.5 acre expansion to a parking and storage area and a second story addition to an existing structure (5400 square feet) for a trash hauling and disposal company with a negative declaration of environmental impact located on the south side of Lennon Place between Eclectic and approximately 500 feet east of Corporate Way, more particularly described as: APN 624-290-038 (existing) NOTE: The expanded area is in addition to applicant's existing 3.20 acre headquarters area (total 6.70 +- acres) . //OVLEY -f-LN.- + gip- I' =5. Y� V'If'J ..•/i• roil N P r 0 J,:la Pr AJ. a a \ .. c it /O on nlO rlea - —F— .<JS '/60O Q 1 Pa, ® e • 1 . / �• mf°.9i Paro /`�P® �/b/r] PVQ/I PO a 'Oe ' ; IJh J.IO I[✓ N; k-LE,VNON . o �lam ?`+;.,�/ �.. ,-.../ ,. may.• � ® � 9..J ua Jc. ` l: c • �el .+. 1°n. 'a •°/ f " un o� °.,w o]ieP. -a ./wnr .....,./. I..,°..a a.. , 9 /0 n=a 42 NO 1 - I SAID public hearing will be held on Tuesday, November 17, 1987, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber at the Palm Desert Civic Center, 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. If you challenge the proposed actions in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the planning commission (or city council ) at, or prior to, the public hearing. PUBLISH: Desert Post RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary II-06-87 Palm Desert Planning Commission mom { A j a I� i I i a i ' us CD it m , CL � .. - — - - ,�,. >_ I r 1}17 T rT- =� ' ,��Y `T 7 iT �^_ T r r , ` `I I ' 1 i � �... � „: F�:�.. ,-i, t r � [ :- ., I k _....: _.1 I .:Ti _ r1.T»7 •---•#�. qi •� T L T1_ - r _ _..•___._ ' "t t ,`. y-. — la� fl-. rYY...I� i.._.1. __ `� ter+-.- C7. ,{.._. _ �- a J 1._.. _�._..1.� �. �.'. _Y -�+ ' _ _ _`T l-.�_i, •I T-_'_T'�'�_.i'f" l�_i' ` r 111 f 3 C r V m SOUTH ELIEVATIION 1 s / I T i Air I � , r i x`r 4 , -r t Olt _ 00 ;T "-Y'4�TjoN s � ` I IF IN �x. X 1 , �{f{'IIryry�I.Ir — 4 " IOWAI 42owl,AL, AFLIF Ll "v ,` #.`�' T }j w ' Q :. w 06- cc o W W � CA 0 � � If 0. 31 t&40 ' 42nd STREF T z �V ti 000-- -- — N 0 T t� NOT MINT 1 Q { A PART PART I I cc C_E Qcoo I I Co�S.Z`I I 170.811 �� ' c o N 0 T N O T N O T I i O ' 15 SEWER 327. ao M A A I = EASEMENT A � __ _ Ifi I f ' E I TI G PAR IN L/S PART PART PART I { r I { 4D 5 5 - j 6-�,T -) s� _ -t t t - - - 13 -- - - — L/S L/S i I I PROPOSED i f I SECOND FLOOR L/S EXIST _/ - ,r_ �, _-,f _,_ _ ;�_-_ --- ilk ADDITION ----_= - - r - ---� w -� - SERVICE BAYS 54oQ S . c�U Lain; I � ����� EXISTING PARKING U ILt* pal jroQ t t oN 1 - r"JG 111 lr9 (it (,� � 7� 114. 7�5 F Y +� r Sri 1J boo EXIST w WELDING AREA 0 { ],-EXISTING C.L. FENCE PA�zc . '� 1 / tX •, # EX. SHOPvin P��• f` , _ 4 1.�160 AG Ac- �.2o kG SO � T C IE Of 6 $ �a a CO �ucl)op F L I .�tc� --/� I.IL ALcr Y 4 a a Ell S I N T R C K PA KING �' ' \`� ---- fit ' 1 f w w Xl Si.ta kW ('l AlAT - Mtn EXISTI G TRUCK PA KI G (GRAVEL ) X I S T _ H K __ i Ire_ W SL*Tr2 \ _tGi 2 SLUM STONE WALL I EXIST. FUELING R r $I!.�I3 1 I�5• ,L l?G#...Y. l 17 �y 174.7E W I q8 87 ems_ . � "04a7 $f SITE PLAN !Sim sUmf_LA�y: � E w 7 v�t.oru� I = 40 FEET > C 'T` 1>t � 12� 4 4 `i 0/1 ;v D 5CAf 146r- LJ 1