Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPP 16-83 INDUSTRIAL BUILDING/ECLECTIC WAY FILE 2 1988 tom` SE PLAN { O` CHANGE TENTATIVE TRACT___-__- r op1ANCE PARCEL MAP 1 ` L,.aF I lk PREPARATION PROGRESS ;"lli ;ATION RECEIVED BY C-O MENTS PUBLICATION - "ES SENT =_D INVESTIGATION "S. NOTIFIED _DING ;INEERING r. �r'-REATION & PARKS SCHOOL DISTRICT DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS FLOOD CONTROL _ I PRELIMINARY MEETING --�C -7 STAFF REPORT FNAL PLAN AtPROVAL PRECISE PLAN (6) LANDSCAPIN PLAN (5) PLAN. DIRECVR MOD. (6) HEARINGS & ACTIONS DATE ACTION VOTE REVIEW BOARD HEARING PC, HEARING PUBLISHED PC. PUBLIC HEARING APPLICANT NOTIFIED CC. PUBLIC HEARING ---------------- ORDINANCE NO. RFSOLUTION NO. -------- EFFECTIVE DATE K -ORDED FOR DATA•BAN ? NING MAP CORRECTED 9 ..m CASE NO. YV 16-83 6 P[Iw 06-83 of. Y ENVIRONIIENTAL SERVICES DEPT. INITIAL STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION CHECKLIST NOTE: The availability of data necessary to address the topics listed below she II form the basis of a decision as to whether the application is considered complete for purposes of environmental assessment. ENVIROtMENTAL IMPACTS - (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers, possible mitigation measures and comments are provided on attached sheets). , Yes Maybe No 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? - b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction, or _ overcovering of the soil? C. Change in topography or ground surface relief / features? d. The destruction, covering., or modification — of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of / soils, either on or off the site? _ _ L/ 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? _ _ LI - b. The creation of objectionable odors? L� c. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? _ p, - " Yes Maybe No 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: 4- Changes in currents, 'or the course or ✓ i` direction of water'movements? b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? i c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? d. Alteration of.the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? _ _ e. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or with- drawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? _ _ _ f. Reduction in the amount of water other- L/ wise available for public water supplies? _ 4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, and crops)? _ b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, ✓ or endangered species of plants? c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal ✓ replenishment of existing species?S. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, or insects)? _ b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or endangered species of animals? _ _ _ c. Introduction of new species of animals / into an area, or result in a barrier to ✓ the migration or movement of animals? _ ._ d. Deterioration to existing wildlife habitat? 3. Yes Maybe No 6. Natural Resources.. Will the proposal result in: / a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? r — — b. Depletion ofeany non-renewable natural resource? 7 7. Energy. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel .or energy? b. Demand upon existing sources of energy, or re- quire the.development of new sources of energy? sti — 8. Risk of U set:tiDoes the proposal involve a ' risk o an explosion or the release of' hazardous substances (including, but not limited / to, pesticides, oil, chemicals, or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? 1c 9. Economic Loss. Will the proposal result in: a - a. A change in the value of property and - 1/ improvements endangered by flooding? t. b. A change in the value of property and / improyementsrexposed to geologic hazards beyond accepted community risk standards? _ _ 10. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing - n levels toethe point at which accepted / community noise and vibration levels are exceeded? A e - 11. Land Use. Will ethe proposal result in the - a iteration of the present developed or v • planned land use of an area? 12. Open Space. Will the proposal lead to a / decrease in the:amount of designated open space? 13. population. Will the proposal result in: a. Alteraticn O the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human V Population of- the City? b. Change in the population distribution by age, income,7}eligion, racial, or ethnic v group, occupational class, household type? _ . 4 - Yes Maybe No 14. Emolo ment. Will the proposal result in additional new long-term Jobs provided, or a / change in the number and per cent employed, v unemployed, and underemployed? 15. Housing, Will the proposal result in: A. Change in number and per cent of housing units by type (price or rent range, zoning category, owner-occupied and rental, etc.) relative to demand or to number of families in various income classes in the City? b. Impacts on existing housing or creation of a -✓ demand for additional housing? 16. Transoortation/Circulation. Will the proposal / resu t tn: a. Generation of additional vehicular movement? b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or / demand for new parking? c. Impact upon existing transportation systems? d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation / or mcvement of people and/or goods? e. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, - bicyclists, or pedestrians? 17. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, o— rat in a need for, new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? 'b. Police protection? _ _ c. Schools? ._ _ _ 7 d. Parks or other recreational facilities? e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? f. Other governmental services? 1 PP 16-83 AMENDMENT #1 The parking and storage area is designed to match the existing area with a 8 foot slump stone wall and landscaping to screen. The architectural commission has specified that the landscaping be increased for the existing facilities also. The new landscaping staff will be concentrating to screen equipment that exceeds the 8 foot height of the wall instead of the wall itself. The two lots on Lennon Place would require sidewalk since they're not in the Corporate Industrial , however staff feels they are not necessary here since one of the lots has already been landscaped and the one remaining would be by itself. The south portion of the storage area is devoted to employee parking and will be asphalt as will be the remainder of the site. The two westernmost lots call for future development which will be reviewed as expanded storage area as part of this application with any new buildings to be reviewed at a later date. The plans call for access onto Lennon Place via a 50 foot wide driveway, since the gates to the yard will invariably be open all day the applicant has presented plans for a secondary offset screen wall with extra landscaping to further screen the yard. Approximately a year ago the disposal company acquired a chemical toilet rental business (Port-O-Let) that 15 also headquartered at this location. These facilities are under county permit and must be flushed out prior to storage. At time of application the applicant inquired about a transfer station. Since these plans for expansion don't hinge on the transfer station this matter will be dealt with at a later date through the conditional use permit process. III. ANALYSIS: A. Project meets all applicable zoning standards. The following precise plan findings must be made. 1 . The precise plan is consistent with the intent and purpose of the service industrial zone and the Palm Desert General Plan. 2. The project' s design will not depreciate or unreasonably interfere with the use or enjoyment of property in the vicinity. 3. The project will not endanger the public peace, health, safety or general welfare. 1 �J% The use has previously been determined to be acceptable at this • location. 2 PP 16-83 AMENDMENT #1 i1 I'll Since the time of the original plan approval office/industrial d projects have been approved in the area. The project may be detrimental to some extent on property values but not substantially while the use will be low in terms of plarking which could benefit the area if parking problems occur. 11 i,6A The facility is under county health permits which protects the health concerns etc. B. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The director of community development has determined the project will have no significant environmental impact and a negative declaration is recommended for certification. IV. RECOMMENDATION: Approve findings and adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. _ approving PP 16-83 Amendment #1 subject to conditions. V. ATTACHMENTS: A. Draft Resolution B. Legal Notice Prepared by /•fir✓/ - 2 Reviewed and Approved by /dlg 3 r. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PRECISE PLAN OF DESIGN AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT TO ALLOW A SEVEN ACRE EXPANSION TO A PARKING AND STORAGE AREA AND A SECOND STORY ADDITION TO AN EXISTING STRUCTURE LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF LENNON PLACE BETWEEN ECLECTIC AND CORPORATE WAY. CASE NO: PP 16-83 AMENDMENT !1 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 5th day of May, 1987 hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider the request of PALM DESERT DISPOSAL for approval of a negative declaration and precise plan of design for the above mentioned project. WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedure for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 80-89", in that the director of community develop- ment has determined that the project will have no environmental impact and a negative declaration has been prepared. WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said planning commission did find the following facts and reasons to exit to justify granting approval of said precise plan: 1 . The precise plan is consistent with the intent and purpose of the service industrial zone and the Palm Desert General Plan. 2. The project's design will not depreciate or unreasonably interfere with the use or enjoyment of property in the vicinity. 3. The project will not endanger the public peace, health, safety or general welfare. 4. The use has previously been determined to be acceptable at this location. 5. Since the time of the original plan approval office/industrial projects have been approved in the area. The project may be detrimental to some extent on property values but not substantially while the use will be low in terms of marking which could benefit the area if parking problems occur. 6. The facility is under county health permits which protects the health concerns etc. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1 . That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the commission in this case. RESOLUTION NO. 2. That approval of Precise Plan 16-83 Amendment #1 hereby granted for reasons subject to the attached conditions. 3. That a negative declaration of environmental impact is hereby approved. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 5th day of Mom, 1987, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RICHARD ERWOOD, Chairman ATTEST: RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary /dig 2 i RESOLUTION No. i I CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE No. PP 16-83 Amendment #1 Department of Community Development: I . The development of the property shall conform substantially with exhibits on file with the department of community development, as modified by the following conditions. 2. Construction of a portion of said project shall commence within one year from the date of final approval unless an extension of time is granted; otherwise said approval shall become null , void and of no effect whatsoever. 3. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein which are in addition to all municipal ordinances and state and federal statutes now in force, or which hereafter may be in force. 4. Prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contemplated by this approval , the applicant shall first obtain permits and/or clearance from the following agencies: Riverside County Department of Health Palm Desert Architectural Commission City Fire Marshal Coachella Valley Water District Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to the department of building and safety at the time of issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. S. Applicant agrees to pay reasonably fees for future improvements to Cook Street. 6. Applicant to pay applicable fees for Art in Public Places program. Department of Public Works: 1 . Complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the city engineer for checking and approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. The engineer shall submit "as-built" plans prior to the acceptance of the improvements by the city. 2. All private driveways and parking lots shall be inspected by the 3 I RESOLUTION NO. engineering department and a standard inspection fee shall be paid prior to grading permit issuance. 3. Landscaping maintenance on Lennon Place and Corporate Way shall be provided by the property owner. 4. Complete grading plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the city engineer for checking and approval prior to issuance of any permits. 5. Offsite improvement plans to be approved by public works department and a surety posted to guarantee the required offsite improvements prior to grading permit issuance. 6. Size. number and location of driveways to public works specifications with only two driveway approaches to be allowed to service this property. 7. Original conditions apply as per Planning Commission Resolution for Precise Plan 16-83. 8. Any and all offsite improvements shall be preceded by the approval of plans and the issuance of valid encroachment permits by the department of public works. 9. Applicant shall secure reciprocal ingress and egress access easements from the owner of parcels 18. 19, 20, 1 and 2. City Fire Marshal : I . Additional fire protection requirements may be necessary when the applicant submits specific plans for consideration and approval . 2. All buildings over 5000 square feet require an approved fire sprinkler system. /dlg 4 CITY OF PALM DESERT DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission DATE: May 5. 1987 CASE NO: PP 16-83 Amendment #1 REQUEST: Approval of a seven acre expansion to a parking and storage area and a second story addition to an existing structure (5400 square feet) for a trash hauling and disposal company with a negative declaration of environmental impact located on the south side of Lennon Place between Eclectic and Corporate Way. APPLICANT: PALM DESERT DISPOSAL HOWARD PARCELL 41575 Eclectic Street 4815 Main Street Palm Desert, CA 92260 Yorba Linda, CA 92686 I. BACKGROUND: The seven acre expansion consists of five lots fronting on Lennon Place rough graded with curb and gutter. The three westernmost of which being within the Corporate Industrial Park landscaped along the street frontage and the easternmost two not included in this association, on of which presently being utilized for storage and employee parking. The existing facilities approved by the planning commission 11/15/83 comprise 3.2 acres at the southwest corner of Eclectic Street and Lennon Place. also outside the jurisdiction of the industrial park. The site is surrounded by S. I . zoning to the north, across Lennon, by five separate office/ industrial projects which have been recently completed or nearing completion, one of which includes a 3,000 square foot restaurant (Gretta's) at the northwest corner of Eclectic and Lennon; to the south extending east to west by a vacant lot. Armored Transport building, cement truck wash-out facility, two vacant lots and a landscape and irrigation supply facility; to the east by Eclectic Street and a mini-warehouse project; and to the west by Corporate Way and three vacant lots with approved plans for a two story office/industrial project. If . PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The plan as submitted primarily consists of two main parts. The building addition will make the existing building entirely two story with the exception of a small single story building addition the applicant is contemplating in the rear. The existing single story building can not structurally hold a second floor so the addition will be tied directly to the ground straddling the ground floor. The architectural commission has approved these plans. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. j i PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert. Planning Commission, held on this 16th day of June, 1987, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RICHARD ERWOOD, Chairman ATTEST: RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary /tm 2 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, DENYING APPROVAL OF PRECISE PLAN 16-83 AMENDMENT #1 LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF LENNON PLACE BETWEEN ECLECTIC AND CORPORATE WAY. CASE NO. PP 16-83 Amendment 41 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 5th day of May, 1987, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider the request of PALM DESERT DISPOSAL for a negative declaration of environmental impact and approval of a seven acre expansion to existing parking and storage facilities and a second story 5400 square foot addition to an existing structure; and WHEREAS, said public hearing was continued to June 2, 1987, in order to permit the applicant to prepare for the commission a report identifying the long range plans of applicant relating to trash collection and other activities within the valley; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said planning commission did find the following facts and reasons to justify their actions, as described below: 1 . Palm Desert Disposal was unable to provide to the commission's satisfaction the information requested on May 5, 1987. 2. Without said information a majority of the commission was unable to properly determined if the proposed expansion was appropriately designed to address the concerns voiced by adjoining property owners and the property owners association. 3. Because positive findings could not be met a majority of the commission felt that approval of the request should not be granted. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning .Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1 . The requested Precise Plan Amendment is denied approval , and development or construction of any part thereof is also denied. CITY OF PALM DESERT P.O. BOX 1977 PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92261 EXHIBIT 'A' TO APPLICATION TO APPEAL DECISION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO THE DENIAL ON CASE NO. PP-16-83, AMEND. #1 The City Planning Staff recommended approval of our application subject to conditions to be imposed on the development for the protection of adjacent property owners. Those conditions were acceptable to us. The staff also recommended approval of a Negative Declaration. The Commission vote of denial appeared to be motivated by an alleged failure on the part of our consultants to supply adequate data to give projections of future growth. we and the consultants believed that they had reasonably complied with those requests. However, we have found nothing in the Palm Desert Planning Code which requires such data in order to obtain the approval of our present application. we believe the majority vote of the Commission was unreasonable and arbitrary and we request the City Council review this matter and overturn that decision and grant our application. J CITY OF PALM DESERT P.O. BOX 1977 PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92261 APPLICATION TO APPEAL DECISION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO THE DENTAL ON CASE NO. PP-16-83, AMEND. i1 PALM DESERT DISPOSAL, INC. Name of Appellant P.O. BOX 3876, PALM DESERT, CA 92261-3876 324-1741 Address Phone Appealing decision of(date of meeting) JUNE 16, 1987 , ±982 regarding application of (if same as Appellant, write "Same" 9AMR for (description of application) _ EXPANSION OF EXISTING FACILTTY AND INSTALLATTnN nn STnaaaR AREA ON LAND ADJACENT TO EXISTING FACIr.ITY Reasons for Appeal: SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "A" FOR OFFICE USE ONLY // Date Appeal filed: �o -���� PALM D Tfrk SAL, INC. Fee Received: ti7/J Public Hearing set fors By fSignature ApRaymond P. Bue, General Manager -Director of Environmental Services Date: JUNE 22. 1987 cc: Appellant Department of Environmental Services File (Complete and distribute after Public Hearing) COUNCIL ACTION cc: Appellant Dept./Environmental Services City Clerk Date: RESOLUTION NO. Department of Public Works: I . Complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the city engineer for checking and approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. The engineer shall submit "as-built" plans prior to the acceptance of the improvements by the city. 2. All private driveways and parking lots shall be inspected by the engineering department and a standard inspection fee shall be paid prior to grading permit issuance. 3. Landscaping maintenance on Lennon Place and Corporate Way shall be provided by the property owner. 4. Complete grading plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the city engineer for checking and approval prior to issuance of any permits. . 5. Offsite improvement plans to be approved by public works department and a surety posted to guarantee the required offsite improvements prior to grading permit issuance. 6. Size, number and location of driveways to public works specifications with only one driveway approach from Lennon Place to be allowed to service this property. 7. Original conditions apply as per Planning Commission Resolution for Precise Plan 16-83. 8. Any and all offsite improvements shall be preceded by the approval of plans and the issuance of valid encroachment permits by the department of public works. 9. Applicant shall secure reciprocal ingress and egress access easements from the owner of parcels 18, 1 and 2. City Fire Marshal : 1 . Additional fire protection requirements may be necessary when the applicant submits specific plans for consideration and approval . 2. All buildings over 5000 square feet require an approved fire sprinkler system. /hs 4 1 ° RESOLUTION NO. ° CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO. PP 16-83 Amendment #1 nepartment of Community Development: 1 . The development of the property shall conform substantially with exhibits on file with the department of community development, as modified by the following conditions. 2. Construction of a portion of said project shall commence within one year from the date of final approval unless an extension of time is granted; otherwise said approval shall become null , void and of no effect whatsoever. 3. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein which are In addition to all municipal ordinances and state and federal statutes now In force, or which hereafter may be in force. 4. Prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contemplated by this approval , the applicant shall first obtain permits and/or clearance from the following agencies: Riverside County Department of Health Palm Desert Architectural Commission City Fire Marshal Coachella Valley Water District Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to the department of building and safety at the time of issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. 5. Applicant agrees to pay reasonably fees for future improvements to Cook Street. 6. Applicant to pay applicable fees for Art in Public Places program. 7. Applicant to pay applicable lizard fees. 8. No residential trash trucks to use Lennon Place. 9. Landscaping to be upgraded throughout the site and include interior landscaping where adjacent to private property. 3 1 RESOLUTION ND. 2. That approval of Precise Plan 16-83 Amendment #1 is hereby granted for reasons subject to the attached conditions. 3. That a negative declaration of environmental impact is hereby approved. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert City Council , held on this 23rd day of July, 1987, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RICHARD KELLY, Mayor ATTEST: - SHEILA GILLIGAN, City Clerk City of Palm Desert, CA /hs 2 73-510 rnED WAnING DnIVE,PALM DE:rMIr,CALIronNIA 02200 j TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 April 17, 1987 1 CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE CASE NO. PP 16-83 Amendment ql NOTICE 15 HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing wlII be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by HOWARD PARSELL (for Palm Desert Disposal) for approval of a seven acre expansion to a parking and storage area and a second story addition to an existing structure (5400 square feet) for a trash hauling and Disposal company with a negative declaration of environmental Impact located on the south side of Lennon Place between Eclectic and Corporate Way, more particularly described as: APN's 624-290-038 (existing) 624-290-018 thru 020, 040 and 041 ' `l ' - r rt—.NOVLEY - \ oe ee� �sY t � � � •nI" ©/xtJ^ \ Ita>L 40 /! ,.! 4 /♦ 4 ®± R I � l! C S '1 a9 q h J.ri 4 t,w 0.9fIL` Q 4 ISr r./O AC 11 C .o .a>/6c. 0 le R r ] • ! , i .4 .. �. LENNON v �lr Yl � 0 C p�.1 VC , t:6JC. a - �r r \ a ] • - vC.SI.L ISL.• 4 S.> ,aan. .> .oe f ass o/ a.cN or seer a a,./r] ...,�eiee .,,,/.e ../ �9 /O .fa 42 ND e.-.a9-ar`.c-c A%_.. /6[15 ( SAID public hearing will be held on Tuesday, May S. 1987 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber at the Palm Desert City Hall, 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert. California, at which time and place all interested persons are Invited to attend and be heard. If you challenge the proposed actions in court, you may be limited to raising only those Issues you or someone else ,raised at the public hearing described in this notice. or In written correspondence delivered to the city council (or planning commission) at, or Prior to, the public hearing. PUBLISH: Desert Post RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary April 24, 1987 Palm Desert Planning Commission RESOLUTION NO. _ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PRECISE PLAN OF DESIGN AMENDMENT TO ALLOW A 4. 74 ACRE EXPANSION TO A PARKING STORAGE AREA AND A SECOND STORY ADDITION TO AN EXISTING STORAGE FOR A TRASH HAULING AND DISPOSAL COMPANY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF LENNON PLACE BETWEEN ECLECTIC AND CORPORATE WAY. CASE NO: PP 16-83 AMENDMENT #1 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 23rd day of July, 1987, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider the request of PALM DESERT DISPOSAL for approval of the above mentioned request; and WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedure for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 80-89". in that the director of community develop- ment has determined that the project will not have a significant impact on the environment and a negative declaration is hereby certified, and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said planning commission did find the following facts and reasons to exit to justify granting approval of said precise plan: 1 . The use has previously been determined to be acceptable at this location. 2. Since the time of the original plan approval office/industrial projects have been approved in the area. The project may be detrimental to some extent on property values but not substantially while the use will be low in terms of marking which could benefit the area if parking problems occur. 3. The facility is under county health permits which protects the health concerns etc. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1 . That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the commission in this case: l PD Disposal official calls expansion denial unfair By J.REZENDES-HERRICK Desert Sun Staff Writer Two disposal firms charged with fixing high prices in LA operate locally PALM DESERT — Criticism of p expansion plans by Palm Desert Compiled from staff and wire reports the $15 billion hauling industry across the Chamblee, 63, of Lakewood, a former Waste Disposal — rejected last week by the Planning Commission ee are LOS ANGELES — Two of three disposal country,The New York Times reported today. Management official; Ishkan Gordian, 43, of unwarranted, company officials companies charged in what authorities said A department spokesman, Mark Sheehan, Glendale and George Osepian,68,of Torrance, said. was a conspiracy to fix prices and keep costs told the newspaper that federal grand juries both officials of Western Waste;and John Mar- -We didn't foresee these kinds of artificially high in Los Angeles operate in the in 11 cities were studying the industry for derosian, 54, of Reseda, an official of System concerns," said General Manager Coachella Valley. price-fixing activities. Disposal Service Inc. Raymond Burke. "The Planning A criminal complaint filed here names Waste Management Inc. in 1986 had solid Gordian on Tuesday denied that there was Commission just flat-out denied it Waste Management of California Inc., which waste services revenues of about$1.57 billion, any price fixing and said that all the allega- and we feel that's a little bit does business in the valley as Palm Desert making it the largest waste disposal company tions were untrue. Osepian and Marderosian unfair." Disposal Co. and has contracts with Indio, in the country. said they were unaware of the criminal The firm sought to expand its Palm Desert,Rancho Mirage, Cathedral City, William Plunkett, a spokesman at Waste charges so they refused comment.There were existing site on the northwest cor- Indian Wells and La Quinta; Western.Waste Management's headquarters outside Chicago, no telephone listings for Scott and Chamblee. ner of Eclectic Way and Lennon Industries, which provides trash collection in said, "Waste Management has more than 400 According to the criminal complaint, the Plane in the Corporate Center Coachella;and Angeles Hudson Co. divisions.While we take any alleged infraction defendants unlawfully conspired to divide the industrial Park and add a floor to "This is a pervasive and longstanding illegal of the law very seriously,those isolated infrac- market for commercial solid waste disposal its current single story office build- practice we have in Southern California in the tions are just that,alleged and isolated." services among competitors and to fix prices ing trash-hauling industry," Los Angeles District Richard Haft, vice president of Western for those services. The proposal was denied 3-2 on Attorney Ira Reiner said Tuesday of the com- Waste, also disputed the allegations, saying, June 2 with commissioners Jim plaints. "We've been in business over 30 years and it's "Everybody pays for this," Reiner said. Richards, Faith Ladlow and Carol The three companies and five of their offi- a highly competitive industry and we compete "Every business that is squeezed by these Whitlock voting against the plan. cials were charged with operating an illegal with everybody." conspirators passes on that initial cost to the The expansion was needed for cartel for hauling commercial waste. They No one could be reached for comment in consumers. So whether you go to a restaurant additional parking and storage to could be fined up to $1 million and lose telephone calls placed before business hours and order dinner or to the dry cleaners to meet the rapidly growing demands their right to do business in California if today to Western Waste Industries and Angeles have your suit cleaned, wherever you go, you for refuse service.Burke said. convicted,Reiner said. Hudson Inc. are paving for the fact that this illegal cartel "We've got two acres with trucks The charges were filed as the U.S. Justice Also charged were Wiley Scott, 32, of Pasa- has been squeezing businesses for a very long parked on top of trucks," he said. Department investigated pricing practices in dena, a Waste Management official; Clifford time." "We could operate that way for the next five years but it's not safe or efficient.It's not a professional way George Berkey owns a real estate haulers could deposit refuse at the "It's an industrial zone for indus- legs or just being very lazy. They of doing business." firm in the industrial park and disposal site that would latter be trial uses," said Ramon Diaz, the had to fumble through to tell me But the plan's critics cited other serves on the Corporate Center hauled to the dump by company city's director of community devel- how many trucks they have." concerns, including the portable Property Owners Association board trucks. opment and planning. "What's Burke countered, "I guess Mr. toilet operation acquired by the dis- of directors. He said the trash ser. That has been eliminated from more industrial than a storage Richards was looking for a fancy, posal company a year ago. vice falls short of the office building the disposal company's application, yard?" glossy report. If the Planning Com- "Logically, this doesn't seem to atmosphere the association Burke said. Richards noted his concerns were mission didn't feel that we supplied he the place for that kind of opera- desires. "Obviously, that is not a good directed at what he called the com- enough data, they should have con- on;"said Eleanor Falk,owner of a "We don't want to get known for place for(a transfer station)and we pany's "very shoddy presentation." tinued(the hearing)." nearby 40-acre parcel zoned for our offices being on Corporate Way realize that now,"he said."That's a During the May 5 meeting,the com- While Richards recognized the single-family residences and right next to the dump," he said. dead issue. We're not attempting mission asked the firm to present neighbors' concerns, he added, "I mobile homes. "They keep their "They have large trucks coming out anything like that but they're still projections on the business' growth don't have that much sympathy. I trucks overnight loaded with gar- of there at a fairly good clip.But it's trying to raise the public on it." and needs during the next 10 to 15 liken it to moving in next door to a bage. You have porta-potties going not a question of vehicle counts — The city's planning staff found years. guy raising skunks. You know he's up and down the road all day long. it's what those vehicles are." little fault with the proposal, how- "They were ill-prepared to pres- raising skunks. You don't come up There's no question you have to be Critics have also blasted a trans- ever, and Commission members enl their case(last week)," he said. three years later when he's suc- concerned with health considera- fer station where gardners, land- Rick Erwood and Bob Downs "As we questioned them more. I cessful and say you don't want to be Lions and aesthetics." scapers and other small trash endorsed the expansion. couldn't tell if they were pulling our next door to a guy raising skunks." CITY OF PALM DESERT 73-510 FRED WARING DR. PALM DESERT, CA 92260 -- (619) 346-0611 LICENSE APPLICATION OWNER NAME Waste Management, Inc. TITLE DRA Palm Desert nisposat PHONE ( 619 ) 340-2113 / (312)654-8800 TAX I.D. /SOC.SEC. NO. 95-2222-974 OWNER ADD. 3003 Butterfield Road Oak Brook Illinois 60521 No. Street Suite City State Zip '+ BUS. NAME: Port-O-Let International PHONE ( 619 ) 340-2113/342-4402 BUS. ADDR: 41-575 Eclectic Street Palm T)Pcprt Cnlifnrnin 99260 No. Street Suite City State Zip TYPE OF BUS. Chemical Toilet Rental RESALE NO. SR EHC 23-787041 CONTR. NO. -- CONTRACTOR CLASS. EXPIRATION DATE --------r-----/'- OWNERSHIPTYPE: - CORPORATION Corporation XXX PART BUSINESS OPENING DATE: 0.7 / 01 / 86 PARTNERS/OFFICERS (TWO REQUIRED) NAME: Raymond P. Burke TITLE General Mnnagpr PHONE ( 619 140-9113 NAME: Dan Doughtery TITLE Controller PHONE (619 ) 340-2111 BUSINESS MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 3876 Palm Desert California 92260-3876 P.O.BOX NO. Street Suite City State Zip DECALS REQUIRED: 7 NOS. Seven,. BOOKS KEPT ON: FISCAL YEAR xxx CALENDAR YEAR APPROXIMATE GROSS RECEIPTS/COMMISSIONS$ 10P000100 (FINANCE RING) BASE FEE $ 60.00 PENALTY $ T TALDUE $ 60,00 1 hereby certify that all information supplied by me is corre4anylicit the County, State,or Federal Government issued to me are in full force and effect. SIGNEDTITLE: Qt: 1 DATE: (OFFICE USE ONLY) MUNICIPAL COD MT CERTIFICATE NO. IN CITY OUT OF CITY ASSESS/IMPR. DIST: YES 0 BUS. CLASS CODE C2� � ACCOUNT NO. �U1 0917, 869. 81 1 • 6000al / .. ._i, i� e \J _- �:� -- ;�. . _ _ _ . - ...-T-_ `;- „.� T`^' "J_ _ .. .. _ � -._ a 7. a _ F Y� _ �4 =' �� r�l� ��,�_ A IM1, �Z �...k f � �G L'Q;uw OO 1P J^ �EbI11SLTi1 ��s OINK i I 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 July 2. 1987 CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE CASE NO. PP 16.83, AMENDMENT #1 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held before the Palm Desert City Council to consider PALM DESERT DISPOSAL'S appeal of a Planning Commission denial for plans of a 4.74 acre expansion to a parking/storage area and a 5400 square foot second story addition to an existing structure for a trash hauling and disposal company with a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact located in a service industrial zone on the south side of Lennon Place between Eclectic and Corporate Way, also described as A.P.N.'s 624-290-038 (existing facility) and 624-290-018. 640 8 041 (expansion). PC.4.Sc//4, Sc C 9, 7. c .c 03 PCP C/rY CF PAL,H CESEPr Cdi-l" Old h0VLEY 1 C4 -Ly- .; } °�T� �%v`r s.rs zz cae tw.w a•���< P� . Ja s ru r..l wl I. GI �=n:, � ue r. uo a .e • �S uvri y�.J, ° a`i y<„' ate•` .>/, r. ,• e ry ,.. .. <., N' ' L WON feY /•r/ JJ V I 4 ..,,or.. a .:. .' ,- c:r- or en.• ;l;car . .....or ...,...r.I r..,.., �9!:O 42.Y0 C7 � SAID pub] IC hearing will be held on Thursday. July 23, 1987 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber at the Palm Desert City Hall, 73-510 Fred Waring Drive. Palm Desert, Cal lfornia, at which time.and place all Interested persons are Invited to attend and be heard. if you challenge the proposed actions in court, you may be limited to raising only those Issues you or someone else raised at the pub] IC hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the city council (or planning commission) at, or Prior to, the Public hearing. PUBLISH: Desert Post SHEILA R. GILLIGAN. City Clerk July 10, 1987 City of Palm Desert. CA ,, ♦ r CITY OF PALM DESERT TRANSMITTAL LETTER 1. TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council II. REQUEST: Appeal of a Planning Commission denial for a 4.74 acre expansion to a parking/storage area and a 5400 square foot second story addition to an existing structure for a trash hauling and disposal company located in a S. I . zone on the south side of Lennon Place between Eclectic and Corporate Way. III. APPLICANT: PALM DESERT DISPOSAL HOWARD PARCELL 41575 Eclectic Street 4815 Main Street Palm Desert, CA 92260 Yorba Linda, CA 92686 IV. CASE NO: PP 16-83, Amendment #1 V. DATE: July 23, 1987 V1. CONTENTS: A. Staff recommendation B. Discussion C. Draft Resolution/Ordinance No. D. Planning Commission Minutes involving Case No. E. Planning Commission staff report dated F. Related maps and/or exhibits. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ A. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve Request by adoption of Resolution No. B. DISCUSSION: The original request consisted of a 7 acre expansion In addition to the second story addition to their existing structure. The expansion acreage was reduced after a Planning Commission continuance and a meeting with adjacent property owners. Staff feels that through proper landscaping the expansion will not be significantly detrimental to adjacent properties and has felt that it would not significantly impact the environment as compared to the existing facility. /hs JRG ENTERPRISES, INC. OBA TAYLOR ENGINEERING CO. NIGEL MATHIESON EXECLMVE VICE PREwoEivr April 29 , 1987 Commissioner Raymond Diaz Planning Commission City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 RE: Palm Desert Disposal Paln to build transfer station Dear Mr. Diaz : Corporate Center of Palm Desert represents over 1/3 of the industrial complex off of Cook Street. As President and on behalf of the association, I wish to object to the proposed building of a transfer station to handle additional trash on property included in our association. This is contrary to our Association CC & R' s that refer to "prohibited uses" section 4. 2 (H) page 11 and "nuisances" section 4. 3 page 12. Also as property owner with a building on Lennon Street, directly opposite an entrance used by Palm Desert Disposal trucks, trucks are creating a cover of dust and debris which gets strewn all over the road directly in front of our business office. In addition there is no wall built surrounding the property mentioned. It is my understanding that over 6 months ago the Planning Commisioner Diaz informed Palm Desert Disposal by letter that they were to errect a wall and to date this has not been done. I would also like to point out that the wall adjoining the area in question is not sufficiently high. Trucks behind this wall are clearly visible since in many cases they are 4 to 5 feet above the top of the wall . Your consideration and inforcement on these matters is requested. Members of our association are concerned that depreciation of there property values will occur if Palm Desert Disposal does not comply to building codes Sincerely, Nigb1 Mathieson President cc: Rick Erwoods Jim Richards Bob Downs Carol Whitlock Faith Ladlow 88-825 PEREZ RD., NO. 7 • CATHEDRAL CITY, CA. 92234 0 1818) 324-9488 . -�'-,BANK' of YUCCA VALLEY May 1, 1987 City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Psalm Desert,' CA -92260 ATTN: Rick Erwood, -Planning Commission Re:, Proposed Disposal Transfer Station Dear Mr. Erwood: The Bank of Yucca Valley, as lender of record in major construction projects within this development, is very much opposed to the disposal station proposition. We have committed, and are currently negntiating,large sums of money in this area, based upon the CC & R' s and general plan in effect. A disposal transfer station would be detrimental to the area and to the owners who have invested huqe amounts of money in good faith in your community. Very truly yours, r Keith C. Robbins, President KCR/llp 7272 JOSHUA LANE, YUCCA VALLEY, CA 92284 (619) 365-6371 MEMBER FDIC AND THE HI-DESERT COMMUNITIES ®PALM DESERT 41-501 Corporate Way DIALYSIS Palm Desert, California 92280 CENTER (619) 346-7588 • 346-6252 May 4, 1987 Palm Desert Planning Commission City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, Ca. , 92260 Attention: Mr. Rick Erwood Dear Commissioner: It has been brought to our attention that the Palm Desert Disposal proposes to build a transfer station to handle additional trash on property included in our Association. This is contrary to the recorded CC&R's of this Association. We are naturally concerned for both health and aesthetic reasons about having a disposal transfer station so close to the Palm Desert Dialysis Center. Respectfully submitted, Palm Desert Dialysis Center `A. x, ad-n- Liz Ramirez, R.N. , Administrator r i i April 30, 1987 City of Palm Desert Planning Commission 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 Attention: Rick Erwood Planning Commissioner Dear Mr. Erwood, I am very concerned with Palm Desert Disposals plans for a Transfer Station in the Cook Corporate Center on Lennon Place. This is in violation of our recorded CC & R's. The area is being developed into an upgraded Commercial/Industrial area . Tenants and owner users include Decorators, Realtors, The Dialysis Center, Contractors and Designers. I feel the idea of a Rubbish Transfer Station and expanded facilities for Palm Desert Disposal contradicts the ideas and esthetics of our Industrial Park. Expansion in violation of the CC & R (prohibitive uses Section 4.2 (h) would result in needless litigation involving the City and the other involved parties. Lets continue to upgrade our area. Regards, Bermuda Partners Kerry A. Meier 4 MAY 1987 ;1JA TO THE MEMBERS OF THE PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION: iMAY 5 1987 I, ELYNOR FALK, PERSONALLY WENT TO THE GARBAGE BUSINESS ON MONDAY�JMA1�"4,= 9r 1987, AT 5:30 A.M.. THE MEN WERE FIRING UP THEIR EQUIPMENT AND LEAVING U FOR COLLECTIONS. I HEARD, I SAW, AND I SMELLED THE POLLUTANTS MENTIONED , IN MY PARTNER'S LETTER, AND I AGREE WITH EVERYTHING THAT MR. MARGULF.AS HAS STATED. I ASKED ONE OF THE MEN HOW MANY TRUCKS THEY OPERATED AND HE ESTIMATED ABOUT 80. IT IS HARD FOR ME TO BELIEVE THAT THIS EXPANSION IS FOR ONLY ADDITIONAL STORAGE. AT ANY RATE, THEIR STORAGE YARD APPEARED ADEQUATE TO ME. THERE WAS PLENTY OF ROOM NEXT To THE OUTHOUSES AND"HONEY WAGONS"TO PARK MORE TRUCKS. SO I WOULD ASK, WHAT EXACTLY DO THEY NOW HAVE IN MIND AND WHAT IS IT THAT THEY ARE PLANNING TO DO IN THE FUTURE THAT THEY NEED 7 ACRES OF LAND? I WAS PUZZLED BY THE VARIOUS PIECES OF EQUIPMENT AND BUILDINGS THAT I OBSERVED AT THE GARBAGE COMPANY'S PLACE OF BUSINESS AND SO NATURALLY THE QUESTION COMES TO MIND, WHAT EXACTLY DO THEY DO, WHAT IS THEIR BUSINESS NOW, AND WHAT IS IT EXPECTED TO BE IN THE FUTURE? MR. HOWARD MARGULEAS, MY PARTNER, WHO HEADS UP AN INTERNATIONAL AGRIBUSINESS COMPANY CALLED SUN WORLD INTERNATIONAL, HAS BEEN PLANNING 7O MOVE HIS CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS FROM BAKERSFIEID TO THE VALLEY REGION. IN VIEW OF THE FINE DEVELOPMENTS AROUND 42ND AND CORPORATE WAY, I HAVE BEEN TRYING TO CONVINCE HIM TO LOCATE HIS OFFICES ON OUR 40 ACRES AA70INING THE CORPORATE CENTER BUSINESS PARK. HUNDREDS OF PEOPLE WOULD HAVE BEEN TRANSFERRED FROM OTHER PLACES TO HEADQUARTER AT THIS LOCATION. THESE HIGH QUALITY PEOPLE AND THEIR FAMILIES WOULD HAVE BEEN AN ASSET TO THE CITY OF PAIM DESERT. IT IS A KNOWN FACT THAT PEOPLE WANT TO LOCATE CLOSE TO THEIR PLACE OF EMPLOY- MENT. IF THE PLANNERS OF THIS CITY DON'T EXERT ENOUGH FARSIGHTEDNESS TO REALIZE THAT ENLARGING THIS GARBAGE COMPANY IN THE CENTER OF THE FINEST i April 29 , 1987 Rick Erwood Planning Commission City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert CA 92260 Please be advised that as a property owner in the Corporate Centre Industrial Park, I am opposed to any expansion by Palm Desert Disposal. The existing operation of the disposal company has a detrimental effect on the surrounding property and certainly should not be expanded. Sincerely, A S .Y. Kimball SYK: sdm cc : Jim Richards Bob Downs Carol Whitlock Faith Ladlow r ` HOWARO P. MARGULEAS P. o. Box 1028 _ COACHELLA. CA 92236 619-398-6181 4 May 1987 Palm Desert Planning Commission City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 Attention Commission Members: As a member of Bob Hope Cultural Center Board of Trustees and its Executive Committee, a member of the Eisenhower Medical Center Board of Trustees, a member of the Boys Clubs of America National Board, and I will become Chairman of the Board of Directors of the California Chamber of Commerce in September, I would like to express the following. I mention the above affiliations for the sole purpose of clearly identifying that I am a civic minded person interested and deeply concerned with the ongoing welfare and permanent well-being of our desert oammunity. I will be in New York at the time of your hearing, therefore, I have asked Art McKay to present my thoughts on the subject of case #PP16-83, amendment #1. I unequivocally state I am not opposed to progress and readily appreciate and realize full well the importance of all the services vital to the well-being of our oc mimity. With great civic pride I have watched the development of such high quality properties as the Desert Springs Marriott hotel and the many newly designed attractive buildings in the Corporate Center Park. The possibility of allowing a garbage business to now become the major landmark of this other- wise outstanding development causes great concern and apprehension -- in fact, it is absolutely offensive. The developer of the industrial park and representatives of the City of Palm Desert persuaded my partner, Elynor Falk, and myself to donate to the city (at no renumeration to us) an additional 20 feet on the 42nd Street frontage, creating an improved alignment for the existing road. This free gift on our part today represents approximately $100,000. We agreed to the developer's and the city's request in our desire to be good citizens and because we are conscientious and truly care about the area. We most certainly would not have made the donation if we would have been told that this gift was to facilitate the expansion of a garbage business. If this application goes forward -- we want the gift of our land back! A full scale E.I.R. should be required in any case. This report should include the effect that this garbage expansion proposal would have on each individual's property enccl>passing the entire area and the further effect it would have on each individual's business in the existing tract. It should certainly include the effect the expansion would have on property such as ours on 42nd and Corporate Way which is presently zoned for multiple MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING CCnffSSION 5 MAY 1987 - PAGE TWO BY: ELYNOR FALK DEVELOPMENT IN THE AREA WILL AUTOMATICALLY CANCEL THE BENEFITS THAT COULD HAVE RESULTED, IT WILL BE A TRAGEDY. THERE IS SOMETHING ELSE THAT I WOULD LIKE TO MENTION AND THAT IS THAT I HAVE FOUND OUT THAT MONEY AND SERVICES ARE TRADED BETWEEN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT AND THIS GARBAGE C -IPANY. IT APPEARS TO ME THAT THERE CAN BE A CONFLICT OF INTEREST IN THE CITY'S STAFF ENCOURAGING THIS EXPANSION BY RECCM�NIDING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION. I DON'T FEEL THAT ALL THE FACTS REGARDING AN E.I.R. OR A NEGATIVE DECLARATION CAN BE FAIRLY CONSIDERED BY PEOPLE WHO DO BUSINESS TOGETHER. I ASK THAT THE MIBERS OF THE PLANNING 00NWSSION REPUDIATE THE STAFFS NEGATIVE DECIARATION RECOMMENDATION AND REQUIRE A FULL SCALE PROFESSIONAL E.I.R. IF THERE IS THE SLIGHTEST CHANCE THAT THIS EXPANSION REQUEST WILL HAVE FURTHER CONSIDERATION. YOURS TRULY, EL R FALK ' OWNER OF 40 ACRES ON 42ND AND CORPORATE VaY Palm Desert Planning Comni.ssion 4 May 1987 -- Page TP%n housing. I am sure the health department should be involved in evaluating the air, noise and sanitary.conditions. Consideration should be given by the garbage campany to moving the existing location of their company to a lesser dense area. One has only to drive by the garbage company and look through the chain link fence as the business exists today. It is certainly not a very pleasant experience to view property on which millions have been spent to beautify, and then, to come upon the dozens upon dozens of garbage trucks lined up along the chain link fence. Addi- tionally, the hundreds of outhouses located in the garbage company's yard as well as the"honey wagons"that service people who have trouble with their septic tanks are clearly evident. It is my opinion that all of those lumbering awkward garbage trucks would create a safety hazard in the immediate vicinity both caning and going. At the very least they would disturb the aesthetics of the area. Based upon the present zoning that we have on our 40 acre property, it would create a great disturbance to the population of the mobile ham park and would adversely affect our property values. I strongly urge you to dec this expansio permit. Yours truly and Marguleas HPM/kh MINUTES PALM DESERT FLA,:r:i;:G �rliii551GN APRIL 21 , 1907 I Moved by Commis Bioner Rii_har,as, seconded by COrrfT,issloner Downs, adopting Planning G_,mmission Resolution No. 1218, approving PM 22499 suL'J jest to cored i t i c,i as amen,_!ej. Carried 5-0. IX. MISCELLANEOUS A. Case No. PP 16-83 Amendment #1 - PALM DESERT DISPOSAL, Applicant Request for clarification of use for the Palm Desert Disposal transfer station located on the south side of Lennon Place., between Eclectic and Corporate Way. Mr. Diaz explained that the applicant would be before the commission on May 5 under public hearing, but wished for clarification on the permitting of a transfer station. Mr. Raymond Burke of Palm Desert Disposal reviewed the request and felt there was a definite need for this facility. Mr . Diaz suggested a one-day tour of the Anaheim facility. Commissioner Richards requested additional written information in lieu of a tour. Mr. George Berkey, Boardmernber of Corporate Center Property Owners Association, felt there was a need for this type of facility, but requested an alternate site. Commissioner Richards stated that he would 1 i ke to hear a detailed report at a public_ hearing and Commissioner Downs stated that he would like to see the transfer station use proposed under a conditional use Permit at any location. Mr. Diaz recommended that Mr. Burke talk to adjacent property owners prior to the May 5 public hearing, Action: Commission determined that more information was needed and felt that a conditional use permit rnight be appropriate. X. COMMENTS None. IU I I SCHLECHT, SHEVLIN & SHOENBERGER JA ME$ M. SC HLECMT A LAW CORPORATION TELEPHONE 16191 320-7161 I JOHN C SHEVLIN LAWYERS TELECORIER 16191 323-1756 . JON A. SHOENBERGER POST OFFICE BOX 1906 JOEL 5. MILIBAND DANIEL T. JOHN50N 601 EAST TAHOUIT2 WAV• SUITE 100 IN REPLY RE.ER TO •', JOSEPH A. GIBBS PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA 9 2 2 6 3-1906 NIPP IAN LYONS' BONNIE GARLAND GU55 CRAIG ERICRSEN 'ALSO ADMITTED IN STATE OE w'ASNIN.TON _� E June 10 , 1987 Z. City of Palm Desert City Hall o 73-510 Fred Waring Drive !I-IN i 0 1987 — Palm Desert, CA 92260 -711 Ll MNG 1111 VL•uv ..1 .: '.!r nlMffl, —� ' (I(; 'J, vaLM UE itk( Attn: City Clerk RE: NOTICE OF APPEAL TO CITY COUNCIL OF A PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION Gentlemen: This letter is intended as a Notice of Appeal pursuant to the Palm Desert City Code from a decision of the Palm Desert Planning Commission in Case No. PP-16-83 , Amendment No. 1, with the applicant as Palm Desert Disposal Company. At a hearing of the Commission on June 2 , 1987 by a vote of three to two, the Commission denied our client' s application for an expansion of its existing facility and installation of a storage area on land it owns immediately adjacent to its existing facility in Palm Desert. The City Planning Staff recommended approval of our client ' s application subject to conditions to be imposed on the development for the protection of adjacent property owners . Those conditions were acceptable to our client. The staff also recommended approval of a Negative Declaration. The Commission vote of denial appeared to be motivated by an alleged failure on the part of our applicant ' s consultants to supply adequate data to give projections of future growth. The applicant' s consultants believed that they had reasonably complied with those requests. However, we would wish to point out there is nothing we have found in the Palm Desert Planning Code which requires such data in order to obtain the approval of our present application. we believe the majority vote of the Commission was unreasonable and arbitrary as it applies to our client and we request the City Council review this matter and overturn that decision and grant our client' s application. 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NOTICE OF ACTION Date: May 6, 1987 Howard Parcel ] Palm Desert Disposal 4815 Main Street 41575 Eclectic Street. Yorba Linda, CA 92686 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Re: PP 16-83 AMENDMENT #1 ' The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of May 5, 1987. CONTINUED TO JUNE 2, 1987. CARRIED 5-0. Any appeal of the above .action may be made in writing to the Director of Community Development, City Of Palm Desert , within fifteen ( 15) days of the date of the decision. RAMON A. DIAZ, SECRETFy� PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION RAD/tm /J a PC Iron a private mobile home resort 42500 Portola Avenue Palm Desert, California 92260 (619) 346-5481 1�57 June 17, City of Palm Desert Ramon A. Diaz, Secretary Palm Desert Planning Commission J 73510 Fred Waring 1 Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 Dear Sirs: We in Portola Country Club have just been informed of the request of Palm Desert Disposal to expand their facilities on the south side of Lennon Place between Eclectic and Corporate Way. We wish to go on record as being opposed to this expansion. Several of our Board Members and Homeowners have inspected the site. We were not aware that the Disposal Company had been allowed in there previously (11-15-83) and are storing some trucks and rental (Port-o-lets) toilets at the present time. We do know that there has been a great increase in biting flies and we are sure that unless stringent rules are placed on the Disposal Company we can expect more. Sincerely, PORTOLA C TRY CLUB HOMEOWNE SSOCIATION III Roger V. an ner U/ President CC: BOD SENTINEL SCHLECHT, SHEVLIN & OENBERGER i A LAW CORPORATION LAWYERS June 10 , 1987 Page 2 When this has been put on an agenda for the City Council for a hearing, we would appreciate receiving notice as early as possible. Thank you for your cooperation. h trully yoyS, S M. SCHLECHT JMS/ct 28/49 '" cc: Raymond P. Burke J U N VG 10041 RENO NV 06-01 0'i49P PE)T� TG b i v .'�JEa8 688 2 l�lt'sE/VT 7 •`.--r—_ ' ' - HFS SA - bF• PDT M-F J U N 2 1987 �2:S1_2 06/OS/87 ;m'nV n J�l4,lIALPj`___ 4_oae�. " F Pr ICS IF'MRNCZ CSP _1�375826S FRS TDRN TORRANCE CA 51 U6-01 09- EST PMS PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION RPT DLY MGM, DLR IMMY 9AM, DLR ATTN. PLANNING DEPT 7 -510 FRED WEARING OR F•ALM DESERT CA 92260 14E ARE OWNERS OF A COMMERCIAL BUILDING AT 74-804 JONI DRIVE PALM DESERT AND ARE STRONGLY OPPOSED TO THE PLAN OF THE PALM DESERT DISPOSAL TO OPERATE A TRANSFER STATION IN THE VALLEY INDUSTRIAL PARK AREA. THE PROPOSED TRANSFER STATION WOULD CERTAINLY DISTROY PROPERTY VALUES IN THE Y. I .F. AREA. YOURS TRULY LOUIS AND KENNETH SILVER 1v!:� VIA LOS ALTO$ REDONDO BEACH CA 90277 21::4 EST 0e5.1 17 : 16 P Q 1 0 5-Sl RENO NV 06-01 1r'7P PDT RENA -, 6 ] 9 S6@ 6E3 1 AGENT TC D RANCHO MIRAGE CA 9 AM TO 6 PM PDT '� �I ) TO Be a 4-04242,S152 06/01/87 Li% tied J - ICS IPMRNCZ CSP 2136-76i l71 FRB TDRN LYNWOODFlMq 'CA' 61 .OE,�O1 p612P EST CITY PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION RPT DLY MGM, DLR CITY OF PALM q .92F. 73-510 FRED WARING DR PALM DESERT _Cp 4226C1 - . --- DEAR.- PLANNING COMMISSION T- AS AN OWNER ON INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL PROPERTY IN VALLEY INDUSTRIAL PAR, I AM OPPOSED TO PALM DESERT WASTE DISPOSAL OPERATING A TRANSFER STATION AS PART OF THEIR EXPANSION. THIS WOULD ONLY WORK AGAINST ALL THE DEVELOPMENT AND PROGRESS THAT PALM DESERT IS GETTING IN THIS AREA. I URGE YOU TO TURN DOWN THIS EXPANSION. YOURS VERY TRULY, BEN KRINITT (FTLBAR FURNITURE MFG CO) 282S BUTLER AVE LYNWOOD CA 90262 1816 EST (EX/1'468) . ® LOAN o SID �. ASSOCIATION �'•� � 4185 Harrison Boulevard P.O.Box 9608 _J`,•N;2I MFNT, Ogden, Utah 84409 May 29 , 1987 T (901)627-IBIO EN G,. f A,0A p`SER John B.Goddard Gnairman of Inc©lord Mr . Richard J. Folkers - P .E. Director of Public Works City Engineer City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fedwearing Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 Re: Northside Country Club Drive, Lots 26 & 27 Dear Mr . Folkers : The purpose of this letter is to express our strong objection to the Kelly Ordinance #416 requiring a contribution by us for the widening of Country Club Drive. Ever since the purpose for which we originally acquired the property no longer existed, we have tried to sale it . The City of Palm Desert has frustrated and effectively thwarted our efforts to do so. First , we were assessed $38 , 642 . 88 for an extension of several streets in Palm Desert that in no way affected our property, nor did it in any way increase our property value . Why are you not assessing all of these properties in the area to improve Country Club Drive? Why are you discriminating against the owners on Country Club by expecting them to pay for the improvements on other properties as well as their own. Second, a pending real estate contract failed to consummate when Palm Desert declared a building moratorium. Other perspective purchasers are not willing to enter into bona fide contracts until the moratorium is lifted. Third, you now request that we approve an additional assessment for the purpose of widening County Club Drive with the acknowledged condition that "it is not the intent of the city council to have full frontage improvements , ultimate street widening, curb, gutter , sidewalk, etc . constructed as a part of this process . The intent is only to have essential street widening so that two lanes are provided west bound on Country Club Drive, a major city thoroughfare. This is not only an expensive way of improving the property, but also a questionable one . Mr . Richard J. Folkers Page 2 Your letter indicates your actions would be beneficial to us in four ways : 1 . "The property when developed would be conditioned to construct these improvements . " While this is true, it would not be done on a piece meal basis which is certainly the most expensive way of improving property. 2 . "The construction will be completed for a cost at today' s dollars at a more economical scale. " This too is not true for you have failed to take into consideration the loss of interest earned on the assessed dollars. It is likely to result in being one of the most expensive ways from our point of view. 3 . "These improvements increase the value of your property. " We take exception to this, it only increases the cost . 4 . "The safety and condition of the city streets are increased, and the irregular width of the street can and does cause problems for the motoring public in Palm Desert . " We agree with this contention, but as we indicated before; why aren' t other properties being assessed to accomplish this when our property was assessed the $38 , 642 . 88 for improving these other properties . It is our opinion the moratorium should be lifted to allow the present property owners the opportunity of developing their properties without suffering economic losses before the City of Palm Desert imposes further assessments against them. While you have given us an engineer ' s estimate, you have not given us a total amount for the job nor have you indicated how the cost is being prorated among the other property owners. In summary, we are extremely opposed to the assessment while the moratorium is still on, and greatly disturbed by what appears to be flagrant discrimination against the owners on Country Club Drive. Very truly yours , <� John B . Goddard Chairman of the Board JBG :kb J RG ENTERPRISES, INC. OBA TAYLOR ENGINEERING CO. NIOEL MATHIESON EXECUTIVE VICE PREGIOENT April 29 , 1987 Commissioner Jim Richards Planning Commission City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fr.e.d.Wari.ng Drive Palm Desert , CA 92260 RE: Palm Desert Disposal Plan to build transfer station Dear Mr. Richards : Corporate Center of Palm Desert represents over 1/3 of the industrial complex off of Cook Street. As President and on behlaf of the association, I wish to object to the proposed building of a transfer station to handle additional trash on property included in our association. This is contrary to our Association CC & R' s that refer to "prohibited uses" section 4. 2 (H) page 11 and "nuisances" section 4 . 3 page 12. Also as property owner with a building on Lennon Street, directly opposite an entrance used by Palm Desert Disposal trucks , trucks are creating a cover of dust and debris which gets strewn all over the . road directly in front of our business office. In addition there is no wall built surrounding the property mentioned. It is my understanding that over 6 months ago the Palnning Commisioner Diaz informed Palm Desert Disposal by letter that they were to errect a wall and to date this has not been done. I would also like to point out that the wall adjoining the area in question is not sufficiently nigh. Trucks behind this wall are clearly visible since in many cases they are 4 to 5 feet above the top of the walla Your consideration and inforcement on these matters is requested. Members of our association are concerned that depreciation of there property values will occur if Palm Desert Disposal does. not comply to building codes . SincerelV,-. " •`-�` Nigel Mathieson President 99-626 PEREZ RO., NO. 7 • CATHEDRAL CITY, CA. 9121234 • [619) 3E4-9466 BANK of YUCCA VALLEY May 1 , 1987 City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Drive - Palm Desert, rn 922(;n ATTN: Rick Erwood, Planning Commission Re: Proposed Disposal Transfer Station Dear Mr. Erwood: - The Bank of Yucca Valley, as lender of record in major construction projects within this development, i.s very much opposed to the disposal station proposition. We have committed, and are currently negot-iating,large sums of money in •'� this area, based upon the CC & R' s and general plan in effect. A disposal transfer station would be detrimental to the area and to the owners who have invested huge amounts of money in good faith in your community. Very truly yours, Keith C. Robbins, President KCR/llp i 7272 JOSHUA LANE, YUCCA VALLEY, CA 92284 (619)365-6371 MEMBER FDIC AND THE HI-DESERT COMMUNITIES April 30, 1987 City of Palm Desert Planning Commission 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 Attention: Rick Erwood Planning Commissioner Dear Mr. Erwood, I am very concerned with Palm Desert Disposals plans for a Transfer Station in the Cook Corporate Center on Lennon Place. This is in violation of our recorded CC & R's. The area is being developed into an upgraded Commercial/Industrial area . Tenants and owner users include Decorators, Realtors, The Dialysis Center, Contractors and Designers. I feel the idea of a Rubbish Transfer Station and expanded facilities for Palm Desert Disposal contradicts the ideas and esthetics of our Industrial Park. Expansion in violation of the CC & R (prohibitive uses Section 4.2 (h) would result in needless litigation involving the City and the other involved parties. Lets continue to upgrade our area. Regards, Bermuda Partners i Kerry A. Meier PALM DESERT 41-501 Corporate Way DIALYSIS Palm Desert, California 92260 CENTER (619) 346-7588 • 346-6252 May 4, 1987 Palm Desert Planning Corrmission City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, Ca. , 92260 Attention: Mr. Rick Erwood Dear Conmissioner: It has been brought to our attention that the Palm Desert Disposal proposes to build a transfer station to handle additional trash on property included in our Association. This is contrary to the recorded CC&R's of this Association. We are naturally concerned for both health and aesthetic reasons about having a disposal transfer station so close to the Palm Desert Dialysis Center. Respectfully submitted, Palm Desert Dialysis Center x, apt. Liz Ramirez, R.N. , Administrator April 29 , 1987 Rick Erwood Planning Commission City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert CA 92260 Please be advised that as a property owner in the Corporate Centre Industrial Park, I am opposed to any expansion by Palm Desert Disposal . The existing operation of the disposal company has a detrimental effect on the surrounding property and certainly should not be expanded. Sincerely, S.Y. Kimball SYK: sdm cc: Jim Richards Bob Downs Carol Whitlock Faith Ladlow CITY OF PALM DESERT DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission DATE: April 21 , 1987 SUBJECT: Clarification of use for Palm Desert Disposal Transfer Station. RECOMMENDATION: Initiate zoning ordinance amendment classifying transfer station as a conditional use in the service industrial zone. DISCUSSION: Palm Desert Disposal has plans for a three acre expansion to their maintenance, storage and headquarters facility on Eclectic. The commission previously approved these uses through the original plans on November 15, 1983. The refuse company is proposing to provide a facility where the public may bring rubbish to and haul it to the landfill . Palm Desert Disposal has indicated that it's expansion plans do not hinge on the transfer station and would encourage the decision makers to tour similar facilities in the Riverside area. Other options would be for the commission to classify the use as permitted in the 5. 1 . zone or prohibit the use in the city since the S. I . zone would probably be the most appropriate. Prepared by Reviewed and Approved by � /dig Ilia FURNITURE MANUFACTURING July 13, 1987 Y City Council City Of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Dr. Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 Dear City Council: I am an owner of two commercial buildings on Joni Dr. and one office building between Velie Way and 42nd St. in the Industrial Park. The expansion and addition of a Transfer Station for Palm Desert Disposal could only result in reverse progress. Since I will be out of the Country during the Public Hearing I am appealing The Honorable City Council to deny the appeal so that the high quality development of the area can continue forward. Your T y, l : 14 Ben n3�£' President it 2828 Butler Avenue Lynwood CA 90262 213 636-1171/638-4206 l • 1 PACIFIC EQUIPMENT & IRRIGATION, INC. COMMERCIAL CONSUMER IRRIGATION INDUSTRIAL EOUIPMENT SALES&SERVICt May 1, 1987 Rick Erwood City of Palm Desert Planning Commission 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 29960 Dear Mr. Erwood: Over a year ago our Company purchased Lot 21 on the corner of 42nd Avenue and Corporate Way to construct our new branch facility for the distribution of Toro products. This site was selected by us partially because of the tight Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions of the Corporate Center at Palm Desert. This is in view of the high-quality image that our Company and product commands in our effort to service our customers, predominently consisting of the golf course industry. We spent almost a year willingly complying with those C. C. & R. 's, and the tight restrictions imposed upon us by the City of Palm Desert. We are now informed that Palm Desert Disposal is requesting that they be given the right to build a transfer station to handle additional trash on property included in our association. This is contrary to the recorded C. C. & R's; specifically, "Prohibitive Uses" Section 4.2 (H) , Page 11, and "Nuisances" Section 4.3, Page 12. A copy is attache d for your reference. We object strenuously to this request and urge you to help support us in enforcing the C. C. & R's. Further, the planned expansion of Palm Desert Disposal is virtually isolating our facility and surrounding us by a waste disposal container parking lot on one side and a cement plant on another. We object to the obvious implications of this, i .e. noise, traffic, odor, and drive-by image to name a few. We ask that you consider our situation, investment and need for a location with a favorable image. TCro - A,i Pr in:! i Y H 3 P 1.1. II d F: & 1'1 L.i ✓,g.,.rr,r..,, I , <-.._..ig I i 'gin,. • .... p., ,. :�,•i` � . ., r ... ,i , Main Office: 19515 East Walnut Drive N. • .Industry, California • (818) 912-8533 • (714) 594-5811 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 6000, Industry, California 91748-0800 Branch Office: 74773 Joni Drive • Palm Desert, California 92260 • (619) 340-3392 Page 2 Mr. Erwood Plam Desert City Hall Planning Commission May 1, 1987 I will be present at the planned public hearing scheduled for Tuesday, Y May 5, 1987 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber at Palm Desert City Hall , to state my concerns regarding this issue. Your support and consideration for our interest in maintaining a high quality industrial park will be greatly appreciated. Sincerely, PACIFIC EQUIPMENT & IRRIGATION, INC. Denn ' D. i Pr sident DDS:pf cc: Jim Richards Bob Downs Carol Whitlock Faith Ladlow i AVIS RENT A CAR SYSTEM. LICENSEE/ .ND RENT A CAR CORP., 3400 TAHOUITZ. SUITE 2u_ PALM SPRINGS.CA 92262 (619)327-1353 LICENSEE May 1, 1987 Palm Desert Planning Conudssioner Mr. Rick Erwood City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 Re: PALM DESERT DISPOSAL/TRANSFER STATION Dear Mr. Erwood: When Grand Rent A Car Corporation chose the property on Hovley Lane for purchase it was due in a large degree to the protection received within the Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions of the Corporate Centre at Palm Desert. The proposal by the Palm Desert Disposal to build a Transfer Station to handle additional trash on property is contrary to the following sections of the CCR: "Prohibitive Uses", Section 4.2 (h) , Page 11 "Nuisances", Section 4.3, page 12 As we have invested a substantial amount of money just in the property alone, my disapproval will not only be in the form of this letter but will also be expressed at the Planning Commission meeting May 5, 1987. T tfully, /, Dick M. L. Crane District Manager DMLC/aa b&— PAMICIA (CORKY) LARSON C UNTY SuperV180r, Fourth Di8trlct or RIVERS .. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE June 1, 1987 ij Mr. Ramon Diaz City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Dr. Palm Desert, CA 92260 Dear Ray: In regard to PP 16-83, Amendment #1 : Elynor Falk informs me that I have been quoted as supporting the transfer station as proposed by Palm Desert Disposal Company, and has asked that I write to you to clarify any possible misunderstanding in that regard. I am not aware of Palm Desert Disposal's plans, and I neither support nor oppose the proposed transfer station. I am not opposed to transfer stations per se, if they are properly located, consistent with surrounding land use, and do not cause a nuisance to adjoining property owners. However, I want to make certain that you and the Planning Commission are aware that 1 have not seen any plans, nor have I given any specific endorsement to any transfer station within the jurisdiction of the City of Palm Desert. Sincerely, PATRICIA A. LARSON cc: Elynor Falk Palm Desert Disposal PAL:rr District Office: 46209 Oasis 6treel.P.O.Draver t330.Indio.California 92202.(619)342.8211.(619)345-1072 SCHLECHT, SHEVLIN & SHOENBERGER JAMES M. SCHLECHT A LAW CORPORATION TELEPHONE 16191 320-1I61 JOHN C. SHEVLIN LAWYERS TELECOPIER Ifi191 323-I)SB JON A. SHOENSERGER POST OFFICE BOX 1906 JOEL 5, MILIBAND DANIEL T.JOHNSON SOP EAST TAMOUITZ WAY, SUITE 100 IN R"Lv REFER TO JOSEPH A. GIBBS - PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA 92263-1906 NIPP PAN LYONS' RONNIE GARLAND GU55 CRAIG ERICNSEN 'ALSO ADMITTED IN STATE OF RnSNINGTON _ June 2 , 1987 City of Palm Desert ISELIVERED City Hall 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 Attn: Ray Diaz RE: PALM DESERT DISPOSAL Dear Mr. Diaz : This letter will confirm our prior discussions wherein we indicated we represent Palm Desert Disposal. On their behalf , we object to any requirement of doing an environmental impact report on their present application. We understand the concerns of the adjacent property owners but we believe those concerns can readily be addressed by the City imposing such conditions as it deems reasonable to its approval of our client ' s application. Our client purchased property in an industrial zoned subdivision. If the City requires an environmental impact report for our client' s application, it would seem that the City would have to do the same thing for all other applications in this industrial tract. That would be just as unreasonable as we believe it is unreasonable to impose such a condition on our client. We urge the adoption of a negative declaration with such mitigation conditions as the City Planning Commission feels reasonable . Thank you for your cooperation. V ry truly yours , � ES M. SCHLECHT S/ct /36 Raymond P. Burke 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 April 21 , 1987 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION ACTION CASE NO: PP 16-83 Amendment #I APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) : PALM DESERT DISPOSAL, 41575 Eclectic Street, Palm Desert, CA 92260; HOWARD PARCELL, 4815 Main Street, Yorba Linda, CA 92686. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of expansion to parking and storage area and a second story addition. LOCATION: South side of Lennon Place between Eclectic and Corporate Way. ZONE: S. I . ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Upon reviewing the submitted plans and presentations by staff and by the applicant, the architectural commission granted conceptual approval . \1 Date of Action: April 14, 1987 Vote: Carried 4-0 (An appeal of the above action may be. made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen ( 15) days of the date of the decision. ) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ STAFF COMMENTS: Please read the attached minutes. CITY OF PALM DESERT INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Phil Joy FROM: Brent Conley RE: PP16-83 Amend #1 DATE: April 10, 1987 The lighting in the complex is extremely important for the security of the facility. The complex should be illuminated with the use of mercury vapor lighting to at least 2 foot candle, particularly by the new second story entrance. The exterior door should be made of steel construction, equipped with dead bolts and latch guards to prevent forcible entry. Brent Conley Crime Prevention Officer BC/rrt Page two. . . HANDICAPPED: Site requirements per handicapp standards. PARKING: ❑ Show number of stalls required. ❑ Revise parking stall locations to allow main entry access. 13 Show international logo, loading and unloading zone requirements. M Ramp from parking lot to sidewalk not shown on plans. BUILDING ACCESS: ❑ Coors shall be minimum 32" clear in width. ❑ Provide 18" space on the swing side of doors. ❑ On plans, show height of all bathroom accessories. ❑ Handicapp bathroom layout does not conform to current standards. Before further comments can be made, additional plans and specifications are needed for review. The following plans must be submitted to the Department of Building & Safety for plan review: Architectural Drawings and Details. Structural Drawings and Calculations. Complete Electrical. Mechanical and Plumbing Plans and Specifications. Title 24 Energy Conservation Documentation Forms. Q COMMENTS: LLER PRINCIPAL PLANS EXAMINER 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 Date DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING AND SAFETY PRELIMINARY REVIEW OF PLANS THIS IS NOT A PLAN/CHECK! DEVELOPMENT: The comnepts below are based on the following assumptions and code groups: 1985 Uniform Building Cade 1985 Uniform Plumbing Code 1985 Uniform Mechanical Code 1964 National Electrical Code Title 24 Handlcapp / Accessibility Standards Title 24 Energy Conservation Standards Title 24 Multi-Family Adaptability Standards Code Assumption: Building Classification Type of Construction Sprinklered Allowable Floor Area: ��Q Basic Allowable L," J 6 � Setbacks ;JAL) Sprinklered Multi-Story Factor Total Allowable Sq.Ft. �blt I CHECKLIST 14667-_ ❑ Plans shall be prepared by a licensed California architect. Show current number on plans. Jjr ❑ Submit a list of features proposed that show compliance to the multi- family handlcapp regulations. Use a maximum cap of $740.00 per adapt- able dwelling unit. FINISHED AGENDA PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION APRIL 21 , 1987 Moved by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner Downs, adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 1218, approving PM 22499 subject to conditions as amended. Carried 5-0. IX. MISCELLANEOUS A. Case No. PP 16-83 Amendment #1 - PALM DESERT DISPOSAL, Applicant Request for clarification of use for the Palm Desert Disposal transfer station located on the south side of Lennon Place, between Eclectic and Corporate Way. Action: Commission determined that more information was needed and felt that a conditional use permit be appropriate. X. COMMENTS None. XI. ADJOURNMENT . Moved by Chairman Erwood, seconded by Commissioner Downs, adjourning the meeting. Carried 5-0. The meeting was adjourned at 9: 17 p.m. /tm 5 6. Yes MLbe No 25. Mandatory Findings of Significance. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment or to curtail the diversity in the environment? b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a / relatively brief, definitive period of time J while long-term impacts will endure well into J the future.) c. Does the project have impacts which are indi- vidually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Initial Study Prepared By: p`�41fi/ r�sc e(�(aTTi- Yes Maybe No 18. Public Fiscal Balance. Will the proposal result in a net change in government fiscal flow (revenues less operating expenditures and annualized capital expenditures)? _ 19. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: a-. Power or natural gas? b. Communications system? _ / c. Water? �L7� d. Sewer or septic tanks? �/ e. Storm water drainage? f. Solid waste and disposal? 1/ 20. Human Health. Will the proposal result in: a. The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? (/ b. A change in the level of community health care provided? 21. Social Services. Will the proposal result in an increased denand for.provision of general / social services? - _ ✓ 22. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in: / a. Obstruction of any scenic vista or view V open to the public? b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? - c. Lessening of the overall neighborhood / (or area) attractiveness, pleasantness, ✓/ and uniqueness? 23. Liaht and Glara. Will the proposal produce new fight or g are? 24. Archeolocnu ala/Hisrtaorioal. Ni11 the proposal tin [ires n of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, ((II object, or building? MIWUTES REGULAR PALM DESERT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING JULY 23 , 1987 Mayor Kelly declared the public hearing open and Invited testimony in FAVOR of or OPPOSED to this request . None was offered . He declared the public hearing closed . Councilman Crites moved to , by Minute Motion , authorize staff to issue permits for The Foundation for the Retarded of the Desert and Temple Sinai - Jewish Community Center of Palm Desert . Motion was seconded by Benson and carried by unanimous vote of the Council . C . REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF ASSESSMENT AGAINST CERTAIN PROPERTIES FOR THE ABATEMENT OF DANGEROUS BUILDINGS . Mr . Ortega briefly reviewed the staff report , noting that the amounts to be assessed included a 257E administrative fee . He added that Mr . Pat Conlon , Director of Building 8 Safety, was available to answer any questions . Mayor Kelly declared the public hearing open and invited testimony in FAVOR of or OPPOSED to this request . None was offered . He declared the public hearing closed . Councilman Crites moved to waive further reading and adopt Resolution No. 87-73 , assessing charges for abatements on Parcel Numbers 653- 370- 024-8 and 627- 071 - 005- 6 . Motion was seconded by Snyder and carried by unanimous vote of the Council . D . APPEAL OF A PLANNING COMMISSION DENIAL FOR A 4 . 74 ACRE EXPANSION TO A PARKING/STORAGE AREA AND A 5 , 400 SQ . FT. SECOND STORY ADDITION TO AN EXISTING STRUCTURE FOR A TRASH HAULING AND DISPOSAL COMPANY LOCATED IN AN 5 . 1 . ZONE ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF LENNON PLACE BETWEEN ECLECTIC AND CORPORATE WAY - PALM DESERT DISPOSAL AND HOWARD PARCELL , APPLICANTS . Mr . Diaz reviewed the staff report , noting that part of the reason for Planning Commission denial of the original request for a seven acre expansion and second story addition was the lack of certain information . He said staff was now recommending that the matter , with the additional information , be returned to the Planning Commission for review and recommendation to the Council . He added that what was being applied for was an expansion of an existing egipment maintenance and storage facility , not a transfer station . Upon question by Councilman Crites , Mr . Diaz responded that he felt this was additional significant Information 13 MtNJTES REGULAR PALM DESERT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING JULY 23, 1987 which had been received since Planning Commission consideration . Councilman Snyder agreed that the matter should be returned to the Planning Commission if this information was not available when the denial was made . Mayor Kelly declared the public hearing open and invited testimony in FAVOR of this request . MR . GORDON PAULUS , 37-711 Peacock Circle , Rancho Mirage , stated he was a planning consultant representing Palm Desert Disposal . He said the additional information requested by the Planning Commission were ten- and 15- year projections of growth , and he would be -prepared to explain these projections if the matter was sent back to the Commission . "Mayor Kelly invited testimony in OPPOSITION to this request . The following were opposed because it would adversely affect adjacent property owners , would not service the Palm Desert sphere and Cove Communities , would negatively impact the environment (noise and air pollution ) , was a health hazard to the public , was not compatible with existing development , and would increase the traffic in that area : MR . GEORGE BERKEY , Board of Directors for the Cook Corporate Center . MRS . ELEANOR FALK, property owner within 300 feet of the proposed project . Mayor Kelly declared the public hearing closed . Council Comments/Questions : Snyder : The Planning Commission should have the opportunity to consider the additional information if it was vital to the decision that was made . However , if the Council does not consider that Information to be vital , the matter would not be sent back to the Commission . Councilman Crites moved to send this matter back - to the Planning Commission with the additional information which was not available at the time of the Commission ' s consideration . Motion died for lack of a second . 14 ''MINZITES ` REGULAR PALM DESERT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING JULY 23, 1987 Benson : Although an Environmental Impact Report had been done on this project , felt it would be appropriate to have one prepared for the entire development in that area . Kelly : What is the additional information which was not available to the Planning Commission? Mr . Diaz responded that the information was ten- and 15- year projections as to growth and needs ( i . e . , how many trucks they will have ) as well as some letters of clearance from Riverside County Health Department . He stated , however , that objections raised at this meeting had nothing to do with those projections . He added that Council could deny this appeal if it felt it had enough information . Crites : Still felt it should be sent back to the Planning Commission to consider the additional data relative to these growth projections . Councilmember Benson moved to , by Minute Motion , uphold the Planning Commission decision and deny the appeal . Motion was seconded by Kelly and carried by a 3- 1 vote , with Councilman Crites voting NO . E . REQUEST FOR AUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED WITH NORTH SiDE COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE KELLY ORDINANCE WIDENING . Mr . John Wohimuth , Administrative Assistant , stated that the purpose of this public hearing was to allow property owners the opportunity to indicate their support of or opposition to this project . He said a letter of opposition had been received from United Savings & Loan Association , which owns two five-acre parcels fronting Country Club Drive ( attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit "A" ) . He added that the other property owners hade been notified , and several had voiced either opposition or support . He said two property owners , CTK and Cook Partners , had already signed preliminary agreements and were basically in support of the project . Mayor Kelly declared the public hearing open and invited testimony in FAVOR of this request . None was offered . He invited testimony in OPPOSITION to this request . MR . STORMY DAYTON THEOPHiLUS , 34-645 Judy Lane , Cathedral City , stated that his family had lived at 72-450 Cholla Drive for many years . He agreed there was a need to widen 15 PLANNING COHIIISSI(1 'l RES01_UTI0N N0. 1234 A RE50LUTION OF THE PLANNING UNIMISS10N OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, DENYING APPROVAL OF PRECISE PLAN 16-03 AMENOME.NT #1 LOCATED ON 111F SOUTH SIDE O1 LENNON PLACE DLIVILEN ECI_LCFIC AND CORPORATE WAY. CASE N0. PP 16-B3 Am_endment_j l_ WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 5th day of May, 1987, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider the request of PALM DESERT DISPOSAL_ for a negative declaration of environmental impact and approval of a seven acre expansion to existing parking and storage facilities and a second story 5400 square foot addition to an existing structure; and WHEREAS, said public hearing was continued to June 2, I907, in order to permit the applicant to prepare for the connnission a report identifying the long range plans of applicant relating to trash collection and other activities within the valley; and WHEREAS, at said public, hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said planning commission did find the following facts and reasons to Justify their actions, as described below: 1 . Palm Desert Disposal was unable to provide to the commisslon,s satisfaction the information requested on May 5, 1907. 2. Without said information a majority of the commission was unable to properly determined if the proposed expansion was appropriately designed to address the concerns voiced by adjoining property owners and the property owners association. 3. Because positive findings could not he met a majority of the commission felt that approval of the request should not be granted. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1 . The requested Precise Plan Amendment is denied approval , and development or construction of any part thereof is also denied. PLANNAG COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1234 PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Cormnission, held on this 16th day of _June, 1987, by the fol1 owl rig vote, to wit: AYES: LAUOW, RICHARDS. AND WHI ROCK NOES: ERWOOD ABSENT: DOWNS ABSTAIN: NONE RICHARD ERWOOD, Chairman ATTEST: RAh1ON A. UTAZss Sec reta5! /tm M•i NUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 16, 1987 some mitigation might need to be imposed and directed public works to work with the developer. Action: Moved by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner Whitlock, adopting the findings as presented by staff. Carried 4-0. Moved by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner Whitlock, adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 1233, approving TT 22622, subject to conditions as amended. Carried 4-0. VIII . MISCELLANEOUS A. Continued Case No: 'PVT Amendment #1 - 11OWARD PARCELL, PALM DESERT DISPOSAL, Appi-i-carit Request for adoption of a resolution of denial prepared per commission direction. Action: Moved by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner Whitlock, adopting the findings 'as present. Carried 3-1 (Chairman Erwood voted no. ) Moved by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner Whitlock, adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 1234, denying PP 16-83 Amendment #1 . Carried 3-1 (Chairman Erwood voted no. ) IX. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS None. X. COMMENTS None. 6 z¢� 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NOTICE OF ACTION Date: June 3, 1987 Palm Desert Disposal Mr. Howard Parcel ] 41-575 Eclectic Street 41-575 Eclectic Street Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Re: PP 16-83 Amendment #1 The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of June 2, 1987. PLANNING COMMISSION DIRECTED STAFF TO PREPARE A RESOLUTION OF DENIAL. CARRIED 3-2 (CHAIRMAN ERWOOD AND COMMISSIONER DOWNS VOTED NO). Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Community Development, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen ( 15) days of the date of the decision. RAMON A. DIAZ, SECRE RY PALM DESERT PLANNING C SSION RAD/tm J 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NOTICE OF ACTION Date: June 19, 1987 Palm Desert Disposal 41-575 Eclectic Street Palm Desert, CA 92260 Re: PP 16-83 Amendment #1 The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of June 16, 1987. COMMISSION ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 1234 DENYING PP 16-83 AMENDMENT #I. CARRIED 3-1 (CHAIRMAN ERWOOD VOTED NO, COMMISSION DOWNS WAS ABSENT.) Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Community Development, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen ( 15) days of the date of the decision.. RAM ON A. DIAZ, SEeEl PALM DESERT PLANNIISSION RAD/tm MIN4TES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 2, 1987 Chairman Erwood opened the public testimony and asked if the applicant wished to address the commission. There being no response, Chairman Erwood asked if anyone present wished to speak in FAVOR or OPPOSITION to the proposed. There being no one, the public testimony was closed. Action: Moved by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner Whitlock, adopting the findings as presented by staff. Carried 5-0. Moved by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner Whitlock, adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 1232, approving PP 87-18. , Carried 5-0. J. Continued Case No 16-83/ Amendment #1 - HOWARD PARCELL, PALM DESERT DISPOSAL, Applicant Request for approval of a seven acre expansion to a parking and storage area and a second story addition to an existing structure (5400 square feet) for a trash hauling and disposal company with a negative declaration of environmental impact located on the south side of Lennon Place between Eclectic and Corporate Way. Mr. Diaz reviewed the previous hearing and outlined the salient points of the staff report. He noted that two telegrams in opposition and a letter from Supervisor Larson expressing neutrality were received. Mr. Diaz stated that there was no application for a transfer station and indicated that a transfer station could not be made compatible with existing development in the area. Staff recommended approval of the proposal , subject to the conditions and added a condition #10 that the wall along Lennon Drive which screens the proposed expanded area shall be eight feet in height and landscaped in such a manner to screen the area above the wall so that it will not be visible. Mr. Diaz stated that the City of Palm Desert as a city had trash picked up at its public facilities as part of the franchise fee. Commissioner Whitlock asked what the expansion area would be specifically used for. Chairman Erwood opened the public testimony to allow the applicant to address this issue. 12 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 2, 1987 MR. HOWARD PARCELL, representative, stated that they had prepared a 15 year master plan. He indicated that the expansion would be used for a service bay addition for vehicle servicing, a wash area, chemical storage, and other uses such as dumpster storage. He indicated that complete perimeter screening would be provided. He concurred with the eight foot wall and the extra landscaping for screening the outside storage. MR. BURK, Palm Desert Disposal , indicated that the portable toilets are cleaned dry and then brought to the facility and no extra changing of liquids occurs. He stated that the city code compliance department checked for odors problems and did not find any smell except within five feet of the sump area. Fie indicated that the sump area where the trucks are washed could be cleaned every day to eliminate any odors. He stated that the property with the chain link fence was purchased in December of 1985 from George Berkey; he knew that the parcel was in the CC&R's and then a few months later the property was thrown out of the CCBR' s . A year later Mr. Berkey also handled a transaction of a larger parcel and they sat down and discussed the expansion and transfer station with him then. Mr. Burk also indicated that it would mostly be small trucks using the facility. He noted that construction was a large part of the business and that they store power poles and fencing so that everything is available and convenient to the construction industry at one place. Commissioner Ladlow asked about screening of portable toilets from the second floor. Mr. Burk indicated that it could be done. Commissioner Richards noted that the transfer station was not part of the request, but felt that if the transfer station was needed the applicant should consider a different site. Mr. Burk replied that it was only an idea and they would not do it if the city was opposed. Commissioner Whitlock asked the applicant how many trash bins would be added and how long the bins keep trash. Mr. Burk replied that it would take 250 businesses to add one truck. He Indicated that trash trucks did not keep trash over night except on occasion and a certain amount was allowed. Commissioner Whitlock indicated that she had observed the site and noted that several bins were filled with trash with the lids open and attracted plenty of flies and creates a nuisance. He stated that he has never had a complaint about odor or flies and indicated that trash bins not covered was not normal . Commissioner Ladlow asked if the flies could be sprayed or covers used. Mr. Burk indicated that tarps are used as covers for 13 ,M i NU'I`E 5 PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 2, 1987 trucks and noted that there were no complaints prior to the plans for expansion and stated that if any existing problem is brought to his attention he would correct it immediately. Chairman Erwood asked if anyone present wished to speak in FAVOR or OPPOSITION to the proposed. MR. GEORGE BERKEY, Corporate Center Property Owners Director, noted that staff did not feel there would be a detriment to the property values and asked how many trucks it would take to make it substantial . He felt that the smaller vehicles are different from trash trucks and thought that this facility serves Cathedral City, Indian Wells and Rancho Mirage, as well as Palm Desert. He also felt that this facility would continue to be the garbage collection center because of the investment the owner has there, but stated that now was the time to look at a second location in a less impacted area. MR. DICK CRANE, Palm Springs Avis Manager, spoke in opposition because the had purchased property in the area and expressed concern regarding property value. Commissioner Richards noted that the commission let a higher quality business into the service industrial area and now they are opposing service industrial uses which probably have less of an Impact than office uses. MS. ELYNOR FALK', P.O. Box 1025 Coachella, stated that after meeting with Mr. Diaz she decided to look at the city file for Palm Desert Disposal , which is public knowledge, and read a letter dated February 20 in which Palm Desert Disposal asked about a transfer station. She indicated that the danger of a transfer station has been very real and not just a rumor. She recommended an environmental impact report be done and was glad that someone else had noticed the odor and flies in the area. Ms. Falk went through the environmental assessment form that was submitted and felt that too much information was left out or incorrect. She indicated that it would be too bad if Palm Desert were to be known as the center of the garbage area If Edom Hill and the Indio dump eventually close. She felt that this development changes the entire atmosphere of the area. Chairman Erwood asked how far away Ms. Falk's property was from the proposal . Ms. Falk replied that it must be within the 300 foot radius. Chairman Erwood asked Ms. Falk how many times she had complained about odor and flies prior to the notice of expansion. 14 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 2, 1987 She replied none, but stated that she had not been in the area often until recently. She asked the city to hire an expert to complete an environmental impact report and settle this matter. Mr. Diaz commented on the letter of February and reiterated that a transfer station was not being requested. He also stated that this property was covered by the CC&R's and then was taken out later. Mr. Berkey informed commission that the lots in the CC&R's was a mistake. Mr. Diaz noted that the property was taken out after the applicant purchased it. Chairman Erwood asked Mr. Berkey how many times he complained about the odors and flies prior to the noticing of expansion. Mr. Berkey replied none, but that the expansion was what he was questioning. The commission and the applicant further discussed the plans and Commissioner Richards felt more concrete information was needed. Mr. Burk noted that a noise study was also done by Mr. Frank Allen and the level was found to be acceptable. Mr. Jim Schlect, 801 Tahquitz in Palm Springs, stated that his concern was to address the issue of an environmental impact report for this type of facility. He stated that a negative declaration was acceptable to staff and indicated that the tenants met the requirements . He indicated that the master plan showed the projections for 15 years. Commissioner Richards felt that an environmental impact report was not necessary, but indicated that the applicant needed to provide more information. Chairman Erwood clarified this by asking how many trucks would be added in five years and ten years. Mr. Burk stated that. the Coachella Valley is running out of room at -the existing facilities and this would have to be considered, but felt the plan they submitted was sufficient for 15 years. Commissioner Richards felt more specific information should have been submitted with exact numbers. After further discussion, commission determined that the plan and information provided by the applicant was not sufficient. Action: Moved by Commissioner Downs , seconded by Commissioner Richards, by minute motion, rescinding a previous commission direction that staff prepare an amendment to the ordinance to allow transfer stations within the service industrial zone with a conditional use permit. Carried 5-0. 15 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 2, 1987 Moved by Commissioner ,Richards, seconded by Commissioner Whitlock, directing staff to prepare a resolution of denial based on insufficient information to base a decision. Carried 3-2 (Chairman Erwood and Commissioner Downs voted no) . MR. SCHLECT addressed the commission and asked for a continuance so that the applicant could provide more information. Commission stated that the applicant could appeal to the city council and present the information to them. Vlll . ORAL COMMUNICATIONS None. IX. MISCELLANEOUS None. X. COMMENTS None. XI . ADJOURNMENT Moved by Commissioner Downs , seconded by Commissioner Whitlock, adjourning the meeting. Carried 5-0. The meeting was adjourned at 11 :07 p.m. '{ e 'q RAMON A. DIAZ,' Secr to ATTEST: RICHARD ERWOOD, Chairman /tm 16 CITY OF PALM DESERT DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT TO: PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: JUNE 2, 1987 CASE NO: PP 16-83 Amendment #1 REQUEST: Approval of a 4.74 acre expansion to a parking and storage area and a second story addition to an existing structure (5400 square feet) for a trash hauling and disposal company with a negative declaration of environmental impact located on the south side of Lennon Place. between Eclectic and Corporate Way. APPLICANT: PALM DESERT DISPOSAL HOWARD PARCELL 41575 Eclectic Street 4815 Main Street Palm Desert, CA 92260 Yorba Linda, CA 92686 I. DISCUSSION: This matter was continued from the meeting of May 5, 1987. ' Since that time staff has met with the applicant twice and then for approximately 2 112 hours with: the applicant and their attorney; the industrial park's president and their attorney; and other adjacent property owners both from within and outside the park. The applicant indicated that he is deleting two of the three lots within the association area decreasing the acreage in the application from 7 to 4.74. He also indicated that he would restrict the residential disposal trucks from using the Lennon Place entry, while staff noted the architectural commission's requirement that the landscaping be increased throughout the site and include trees inside the wall of the storage area when adjacent to private property to form a solid canopy above the 8 foot wall to screen the facility from the street and a partial canopy from adjacent property with the intent being that a full canopy will be provided, if needed, when that property develops. The negative comments concerning the project raised at the meeting are listed below with staff's response following. 1 . The use does not meet the intent of S. I . zone by being .of such a large magnitude. Response: Industrialism of a larger magnitude not permitted by the ordinance would refer to the manufacture or distribution of good outside of the area. The project serves only the city and surrounding communities meeting the intent of the code (copy attached) as previously determined by the commission. f r � �I L� I 1 :PC STAFF REPORT PP 16-83 AMENDMENT #1 JUNE 2, 1987 2. Presently the facility generates a considerable amount of dust and how the expansion will affect this. Response: The project will pave and screen the area where the dust is currently being generated. 3. The expansion will generate excessive traffic and the temporary power poles will create traffic hazards when being transported through the industrial park. Response: The power poles are approximately the same length as a semi-truck which are common in an industrial park. The disposal facility would be classified as an industrial use generating 52.4 average daily trips per acre or 248 total while an office generates 240 trips per acre. The office/industrial projects in the area would be an, average of these two figures, 146 A.D.T. per acre or 693 A.D.T. were the acreage used for similar uses as adjacent to it. 4. The existing facility should not be allowed to expand because of odors that presently emanate from it. Response: The application has stepped up the cleaning of dumdsters as they are brought in when odors are present. However this is an existing situation and will be occurring whether or not the expansion is allowed and will be monitored by the City Enforcement Department as they were brought aware of the situation after the plans were submitted. The expansion should also act as a buffer between the existing wash-out facility and other uses to the west. 5. The expansion will depreciate property values in the area. Response: The expansion may not appreciate values in the area if the area were to continue along the office/industrial nature, however the use fits into the industrial classification which the entire subdivision is zoned for while the present facility was operational when the rest of the subdivision was developed so that adjacent property owners know of the disposal companyf presence when they purchased their property. 6. The proposed use violates the CCBR's of the association. 2 *PC STAFF REPORT PP 16-83 AMENDMENT #1 JUNE 2, 1987 Response: The application is now comprised of three lots which were all part of the Corporate Park subdivision. Two of the lots were later deleted from the association while the one westernmost lot remains in the association. It is the city's policy to cooperate with property owners' associations as much as possible, however in this instance it appears that it is a situation between the property owner and the association and the city should review the project independent of the CC&R regulations. Based on these arguments, and the fact that the company is within the city's jurisdiction and might have an outside interest, adjacent property owners requests an E. I .R. Staff feels that an E. I .R. would be appropriate if a transfer station was part of the application since trash would then start being brought to the site by people other than trash handlers and the associated alternatives that would need to be discussed. However, staff feels that a requirement for an E. I .R. can not be justified unless requested by the 'commission 7 for the creation of a storage yard. 11. RECOMMENDATION: Staff feels the project is acceptable and recommends: A. Adoption of the findings from the previous staff report. B. Adoption of Planning Commission Resolution No. approving PP 16-83 Amendment #1 . Prepared by Reviewed and Approved by /tm 3 i b , CITY OF PALM DESERT DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission DATE: May 5, 1987 CASE NO: PP 16-83 Amendment #1 REQUEST: Approval of a seven acre expansion to a parking and storage area and a second story addition to an existing structure (5400 square feet) for a trash hauling and disposal company with a negative declaration of environmental impact located on the south side of Lennon Place between Eclectic and Corporate Way. APPLICANT: PALM DESERT DISPOSAL HOWARD PARCELL 41575 Eclectic Street 4815 Main Street Palm Desert, CA 92260 Yorba Linda, CA 92686 1. BACKGROUND: The seven acre expansion consists of five lots fronting on Lennon Place rough graded with curb and gutter. The three westernmost of which being within the Corporate Industrial Park landscaped along the street frontage and the easternmost two not included in this association, on of which presently being utilized for storage and employee parking. The existing . facilities approved by the planning commission 11/15/83 comprise 3.2 acres at the southwest corner of Eclectic Street and Lennon Place, also outside the jurisdiction of the industrial park. The site is surrounded by S. I . zoning to the north, across Lennon, by five separate office/ industrial projects which have been recently completed or nearing completion, one of which includes a 3,000 square foot restaurant (Gretta's) at the northwest corner of Eclectic and Lennon; to the south extending east to west by a vacant lot, Armored Transport building, cement truck wash-out facility, two vacant lots and a landscape and irrigation supply facility; to the east by Eclectic Street and a mini-warehouse project; and to the west by Corporate Way and three vacant lots with approved plans for a two story office/industrial project. 11 . PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The plan as submitted primarily consists of two main parts. . The building addition will make the existing building entirely two story with the exception of a small single story building addition the applicant is contemplating In the rear. The existing single story building can not structurally hold a second floor so the addition will be tied directly to the ground straddling the ground floor. The architectural commission has approved these plans. PP 16-83 AMENDMENT #1 The parking and storage area Is designed to match the existing area with a 8 foot slump stone wall and landscaping to screen. The architectural 'commission has specified that the landscaping be increased for the existing facilities also. The new landscaping staff will be concentrating to screen equipment that exceeds the 8 foot height of the wall instead of the wall itself. The two lots on Lennon Place would require sidewalk since they're not in the Corporate Industrial , however staff feels they are not necessary here since one of the lots has already been landscaped and the one remaining would be by itself. The south portion of the storage area is devoted to employee parking and will be asphalt as will be the remainder of the site. The two westernmost lots call for future development which will be reviewed as expanded storage area as part of this application with any new buildings to be reviewed at a later date. The plans call for access onto Lennon Place via a 50 foot wide driveway, since the gates to the yard will invariably be open all day the applicant has presented plans for a secondary offset screen wall with extra landscaping to further screen the yard. Approximately a year ago the disposal company acquired a chemical toilet rental business (Port-O-Let) that Is also headquartered at this location. These facilities are under county permit and must be flushed out prior to storage. At time of application the applicant inquired about a transfer station. Since these plans for expansion don't hinge on the transfer station this matter will be dealt with at a later date through the conditional use permit process. Ill . ANALYSIS: A. Project meets all applicable zoning standards. The following precise plan findings must be made. 1 . The precise plan Is consistent with the intent and purpose of the service industrial zone and the Palm Desert General Plan. 2. The project's design will not depreciate or unreasonably interfere with the use or enjoyment of property in the vicinity. 3. The project will not endanger the public peace, health, safety or general welfare. 1 LA& The use has previously been determined to be acceptable at this 1 location. 2 PP 16-83 AMENDMENT #1 rt "tA Since the time of the original plan approval office/industrial 0 projects have been approved in the area. The project may be detrimental to some extent on property values but not substantially while the use will be low in terms of @arking which could benefit the area if parking problems occur. 11 The facility is under county health permits which protects the health concerns etc. B. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The director of community development has determined the project will have no significant environmental impact and a negative declaration is recommended for certification. IV. RECOMMENDATION: Approve findings and adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. approving PP 16-83 Amendment #1 subject to conditions. V. ATTACHMENTS: A. Draft Resolution B. Legal Notice Prepared by Reviewed and Approved by /dlg 3 FINISHED AGENDA PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION APRIL 21 , 1987 Moved by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner Downs, adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 1218, approving PM 22499 subject to conditions as amended. Carried 5-0. IX. MISCELLANEOUS A. Case No. PP 16-83 Amendment #1 - PALM DESERT DISPOSAL, Applicant Request for clarification of use for the Palm Desert Disposal transfer station located on the south side of Lennon Place, between Eclectic and Corporate Way. Action: Commission determined that more information was needed and felt that a conditional use permit be appropriate. X. COMMENTS None. XI. ADJOURNMENT Moved by Chairman Erwood, seconded by Commissioner Downs, adjourning the meeting. Carried 5-0. The meeting was adjourned at 9: 17 p.m. /tm 5 1. 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611n�� — Date 4, "I DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING AND SAFETY PRELIMINARY REVIEW OF PLANS THIS IS NOT A PLAN CHECKI DEVELOPMENT: �9p The comments below are based on the following assumptions and code groups: 1985 Uniform Building Code 1985 Uniform Plumbing Code 1985 Uniform Mechanical Code 1984 National Electrical Code Title 24 Handicapp j Accessibility Standards Title 24 Energy Conservation Standards Title 24 Multi-Family Adaptability Standards Code Assumption: Building Classification ,^�� Type of Construction �t 1 Sprinkiered ' Allowable Floor Area: Basic A 1 I owab I e Setbacks Sprinklered Multi-Story Factor Total Allowable Sq.Ft. fb CHECKLIST ❑ Plans shall be prepared by a licensed California architect. Show current number on plans. Nlto� ❑ Submit a list of features proposed that show compliance to the multi- family handicapp regulations. Use a maximum cap of $740.00 per adapt- able dwelling unit. i Page -two. . . HANDICAPPED: Site requirements per handicapp standards. PARKING: ❑ Show number of stalls required. ❑ Revise parking stall locations to allow main entry access. ❑ Show international logo, loading and unloading zone requirements. ❑ Ramp from parking lot to sidewalk not shown on plans. BUILDING ACCESS: ❑ Doors shall be minimum 32" clear in width. ❑ Provide 18" space on the swing side of doors. ❑ On plans, show height of all bathroom accessories. ❑ Handicapp bathroom layout does not conform to current standards. Before further comments can be made, additional plans and specifications are needed for review. The following plans must be submitted to the Department of Building & Safety for plan review: Architectural Drawings and Details. Structural Drawings and Calculations. Complete Electrical , Mechanical and Plumbing Plans and Specifications. PLTitle 24 Energy Conservation Documentation Forms. COMMENTS: ELLER PRINCIPAL PLANS EXAMINER CITY OF PALM DESERT INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Phil Joy FROM: Brent Conley RE: PP16-83 Amend #1 DATE: April 10, 1987 The lighting in the complex is extremely important for the security of the facility. The complex should be illuminated with the use of mercury vapor lighting to at least 2 foot candle, particularly by the new second story entrance. The exterior door should be made of steel construction, equipped with dead bolts and latch guards to prevent forcible entry. Brent Conley Crime Prevention Officer BC/rrt 73.610 rFIEU VVAnlh(3 DI11VE,PALM UGGEIIf,CALIFUNNIA 9P200 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 " April 17, 1987 CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE CASE NO. PP 16-83 Amendment #1 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by HOWARD PARSELL (for Palm Desert Disposal) for approval of a seven acre expansion to a parking and storage area and a second story addition to an existing structure (5400 square feet) for a trash hauling and disposal company with a negative declaration of environmental Impact located on the south side of Lennon Place between Eclectic and Corporate Way, more particularly described as: APN's 624-290-038 (existing) 624-290-018 thru 020, 040 and 041 •x. +—NOVLEY Y ® V ar• � zO C'' '4u Pa[ o F P♦ � M1 N Ja 4©osYIC; 3 g a s °^2/o.c 'z A AG V' V er� o � I ® I /o� iO o 'r/6 0 leM e,[ J ° • i Lia q M.n sv� � Aa q° YC"isv/ l neeP Poi'J AYC 669C° <°r.a 0 �M1 � N� 1 0-®OSa IC [ ?�. i].a.]e Ufa l A • .. 'l6Jl AG. QS A.,,.e., c♦ ° LENNON - � �ea.c. ' `sR / ids ss v.u[r e' gyp,. �� ; )�,' �• N 1 Q/arS� L` • /xJ A s 0 . I C • m� i i _ SAID public hearing will be held on Tuesday. May 5, 1987 at 7:00 p.m. in a the Council Chamber at the Palm Desert City Hall, 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all interested persons are Invited to attend and be heard. If you challenge the proposed actions in court, you may be limited to raising only those Issues you or someone else .raised at the public hearing described In this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the city council (or planning commisslon) at, or prior to, the public hearing. PUBLISH: Desert Post PAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary April 24, 1987 Palm Desert Planning Commission I I 25 . 34 . 010--25 .34 . 020 Chapter 25 .34 SI SERVICE INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT Sections : 25 . 34 . 010 Purpose . 25 . 34 .020 Permitted uses . 25 . 34 . 030 Conditional uses . 25 . 34 .040 Accessory uses . ( . 25 . 34 . 050 Prohibited uses . I 25 . 34 .060 Provisions for site plan review. 25 . 34 .070 Lot specifications . i ^ 25 . 34 .080 Yards . 25 . 34 . 090 Building height. 25 -34 .100 Off-street parking and loading requirements . 25 .34 .110 Utilities . 25 .34 . 120 Trash handling. 25 . 34 .130 Signs . 25 . 34 . 140 Access . 25 . 34 .150 Outside storage . 25 . 34 . 160 Required landscaping. 25 .34 .170 Perimeter screening. 25 .34 .180 Special standards . i 25 . 34 .010 Purpose . The intent and purpose of the ser- vice industrial district is to allow for the manufacture , distribution and service thereof of products intended for local usage within Palm Desert, its sphere of influence and surrounding cove communities . Industrialism of any larger magnitude would not be in keeping with the intended residen- tial , resort , recreational character of the community , and therefore would not be permitted. (Ord . 96 §1 (part) , 1975 : Exhibit A §25 .20-1) . �� 25 . 34 .020 Permitted uses . The following uses shall be permitted: . -- A: Equipment maintenance and storage facilities B . Maintenance-facilities (bulk n-d'er ni g janitorial , etc . ) ; C . Mortuaries ; I , D. Pest control facilities ; E. Preparation of foodstuffs (no processing) e .g. , ' t baking, bottling, etc . ; . F. Production of home and office decor accessories ; G. Public utility and public service facilities ; H. Support facilities for local construction, renova- tion and installation of related equipment; I . Uses customarily related to any of the uses listed in this section; 353 _ tJ i 04 �Ml�,T olod P.R.-4 9J>. \ The r �i:. \ �/tlo!/ ♦� \` ;♦64\\`\\ \� A I i( II c sa ]Lakes�011ntr �^� cll vv ^ - / ',-- II QI�1 7 E 3 IPRIV.iE Si RCE[31 ti„ 1 ' PA.-4 a b _ / a P.R.-4 LANE Mair rll®tf93 MLOMiNO D¢sa:s+t.Springs �san4 `1_ _ R NNIN6 SPRING T� 1 4 Ea.. [a.,m,r PALMS: P.R.5 s.P. r - �.� /// eo t L ,.� .._ D.S. P.R.-4 Oct 16 q HOVLEY CAW-0 Ham x r ~ � a S. s.P. F - o•l/ i�l `v� P.R.-5 1 / /' O.S. E S.L, S.P. ` 1 s x S.P. \ P.R.-5 A.H.D. P.R.-18 10 n I.+rt f*,•Ern? ' I�1 COUNTY 0' ;ai" II �y e o`O i ; + .Tort ia +v ■ �+ Y !; +oN� oN�„E e \ • COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE r R-1-1A O.S. �L1 I: �i,> `. -PROOF OF PRICATION This space is for life County Clerk's Filing Stamp (201S.5 C.C.P.) STATE OF CALIFORNIA, County of Riverside CITY OF PALM DESERT _ 1 am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; 1 am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to Proof of Publication of or Interested in the above-entitled matter. I CASE No . PP 1 6-83 AMENDMENT 111 , am the principal clerk of the printer of the .......................................................... DESERT POST ......:....................................... ••••••.•••• .................................................... _. CITY OF PALM DESERT ...........................................:.... LEGAL NOTICE CASE NO.PP 1"3 Amendment No.1 a newspaper of general circulation, printed NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held be- fore the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request Bi-weekly by HOWARD PARSELL(for Palm Desert Disposal)for approval of a and published .................................. seven acre expansion to a parking and storage area and a second story addition to an existing structure(5400 square feet)for a trash in the City of .•Palm Desert hauling and disposal company with a negative declaration of en- ........................... vlronmental Impact located on the south side of Lennon Place be. County Of Riverside, and which news- tween Eclectic and Corporate Way, more particularly described as: APN's 624.29D-038(existing)624-290-018 thru 020, 040 and paper has been adjudged a newspaper 041 of general circulation by the Superior SAID public hearing will be held on Tuesday, May 5. 1987 at 7:00 p.m.in the Council Chamber at the Palm Desert City Hall,73-510 Court of the County of Riverside, State of Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all Interested persons are Invited to attend and be heard. If you challenge the proposed actions In court,you may be limited to California, under the date of.. S, 196 4., raising only those Issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice,or in written correspondence de- 8 3 6 58 livered to the city council(or planning commission)at,or prior to, Case Number ................; that the notice, the public hearing. RAMON A.DIAZ.Secretary of which the annexed is a printed copy (set Palm Desert Planning Commission in type not smaller than nonpareil), has (Pub.D.P.Apr.24,1987) been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: 4 ...4..................................... all in the year 19..8.Z. I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing Is true and correct. Dated at.RAln..P.e.ge1•.t..................... California,this..24 th..day of...AP?;-19 „A 77. Sig ature Free copies of this blank form may be secured from: CALIFORNIA NEWSPAPER SERVICE BUREAU, INC. Legal Advertising Clearing House 120 West Second St., Los Angeles, Calif. 90012 Telephone: (213) 625-2541 Please renuaat GENERAL Proof of Publleatlon when orderino this term. �AVIS RENT A CAR SYSTEM, LICENSEE/ JD RENT A CAR CORP.,3400 TAHOUITZ,SUITE 20., ALM SPRINGS.CA 92262(619(327-1353 Cm LICENSEE May 1, 1987 Palm Desert Planning Commissioner Mr. Rick Elwood City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 Re: PALM DESERT DISPOSAL/TRANSFER STATION Dear Mr. Erwood: When Grand Rent A Car Corporation chose the property on Hovley Lane for purchase it was due in a large degree to the protection received within the Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions of the Corporate Centre at Palm Desert. The proposal by the Palm Desert Disposal to build a Transfer Station to handle additional trash on property is contrary to the following sections of the CCR: "Prohibitive Uses", Section 4.2 (h) , Page 11 "Nuisances", Section 4.3, page 12 As we have invested a substantial amount of money just in the property alone, my disapproval will not only be in the form of this letter but will also be expressed at the Planning Commission meeting May 5, 1987. Res tfully, Dick M. L. Crane District Manager DMLC/aa ,i (j) Stockyard or slaughter of animals; V-4 C (k) Smelting of iron, tin, zinc or other ores; (1) Cemeteries; H ti (m) Jail or honor farms. 4. 3 NUISANCES No rubbish or debris of any kind shall be permitted to accumulate upon or adjacent to any site other than normal ac- cumulation and storage of trash in connection with a confined and reasonably prompt trash disposal or pick up program, and no odors shall be permitted to arise therefrom so as to render any site or portion thereof unsanitary, unsightly, offensive or detrimental to any of the property in the vicinity thereof or to the occupants thereof. No nuisance shall be permitted to exist or operate upon any site so as to be offensive or detrimental to any property in the vicinity thereof or to its occupants. 4. 4 MAINTENANCE AND REPAIRS Each site and all improvements thereon shall at all times be constructed, kept and maintained in first-class condition, repair and appearance. All repairs, alterations, replacements or additions to improvements shall be at least equal to the original work in class and quality. Each owner shall also be responsible at all times for de- termining that all improvements and the plans and specifications therefor shall conform and comply in all respects with these re- strictions, all other restrictions of record, all applicable governmental regulations, and all exterior architectural design, location and color specifications as may be approved by Declarant. Each owner shall also adopt and maintain such standards of prop- erty space maintenance, appearance and housekeeping as shall be reasonable and customary for similar operations or enterprises and shall enforce compliance with such standards by all tenants, occupants, or users of space. -12- ri IV. REGULATING OPERATIONS AND USES to �2 0 W 4. 1 PERMITTED USES CD No operation or use of property within Corporate Centre shall be- permitted until the plans and specifications therefor have been submitted and approved in writing by Declarant pur- suant to the procedures in Article III . Unless otherwise specifically prohibited herein, any in- dustrial or commercial operation and use will be permitted if it is performed or carried out entirely within a building that is designed and constructed so that said enclosed operations and uses do not cause or produce a nuisance to adjacent sites, such as but not limited to, unreasonable vibration, sound, electro- mechanical disturbances, radiation, air or water pollution, dust, or emission of odors, toxic or non-toxic matter. All lighting is to be reasonably shielded from adjacent sites. De- clarant may restrict, control, or prohibit any use or uses of any site subject to this Declaration, which Declarant in its sole discretion deems to create a nuisance to adjacent sites or which Declarant deems offensive or detrimental to any other property subject to this Declaration. 4 . 2 PROHIBITED USES The following operations and uses shall not be permitted on any property subject to these restrictions: (a) Residential; (b) Trailer courts; (c) Labor camps; (d) Junk yards; (e) Drilling for and/or the removal of oil, gas or other hydrocarbon substances; (f) Commercial excavation of building or construction materi®ls; C (g) Distillation of bones; (h) Dumping, disposal, incineration or reduction of garbage, sewage, dead animals, or refuse; (i) Fat rendering; -11- PACIFIC EQUIPMENT & IRRIGATION, INC. COMMERCIAL 9 CONSUMER * IRRIGATION INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT 9 SALES&SERVICE May 1, 1987 Rick Erwood City of Palm Desert Planning Commission 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 29960 Dear Mr. Erwood: Over a year ago our Company purchased Lot 21 on the corner of 42nd Avenue and Corporate Way to construct our new branch facility for the distribution of Toro products. This site was selected by us partially because of the tight Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions of the Corporate Center at Palm Desert. This is in view of the high-quality image that our Company and product commands in our effort to service our customers, predominently consisting of the golf course industry. We spent almost a year willingly complying with those C. C. & R. 's, and the tight restrictions imposed upon us by the City of Palm Desert. We are now informed that Palm Desert Disposal is requesting that they be given the right to build a transfer station to handle additional trash on property included in our association. This is contrary to the recorded C. C. & R's; specifically, "Prohibitive Uses" Section 4.2 (H) , Page 11, and "Nuisances" Section 4.3, Page 12. A copy is attache d for your reference. We object strenuously to this request and urge you to help support us in enforcing the C. C. & R's. Further, the planned expansion of Palm Desert Disposal is virtually isolating our facility and surrounding us by a waste disposal container parking lot on one side and a cement plant on another. We object to the obvious implications of this, i .e. noise, traffic, odor, and drive-by image to name a few. We ask that you consider our situation, investment and need for a location with a favorable image. Toro•Amerind/Mackissic• Beeline•Byho•Chicopee•Cushman• Daihatsu• Dedoes• Echo•Fayette•FMC Bean• Foley•Gandy H & R • Holland • K & D Kurb • Keystone • Lely • Lewis • Line King • Mars • McLane • Master • McCulloch • Mitsubishi • Myers Olathe Par-Aide • Peco • PowerTrim • Ryan • snowco Standard Stewart • TurfVac • Vicon • Woods • Vrisimo • Zieman Main Office: 19515 East Walnut Drive N. Industry, California • (818) 912-8533 • (714) 594-5811 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 8000, Industry, California 91748-0800 Branch Office: 74773 Joni Drive • Palm Desert, California 92260 • (619) 340-3392 i Y Page 2 Mr. Erwood Plam Desert City Hall Planning Commission May 1, 1987 I will be present at the planned public hearing scheduled for Tuesday, May 5, 1987 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber at Palm Desert City Hall , to state my concerns regarding this issue. Your support and consideration for our interest in maintaining a high quality industrial park will be greatly appreciated. Sincerely, PACIFIC EQUIPMENT & IRRIGATION, INC. ePresident D, i DDS:pf cc: Jim Richards Bob Downs Carol Whitlock Faith Ladlow A Waste Management Company PALM DESERT DISPOSAL EXPANSION 6 GROWTH HISTORY: Palm Desert Disposal began operations in the Coachella Valley during the 1950 ' s . In '1966. Palm Desert Disposal was sold to Fred Brignardello and Gino Scopesi both of whom are still with the company. They sold the company in 1972 to S.C.A. Services, Inc . , who were acquired by the current owners, Waste Management Inc. , the nations leading solid waste hauling company, in September 1985 . Palm Desert Disposal has expanded with the community' s needs throughout its history. In July 1986, Palm Desert Disposal acquired Bill ' s Sanitation, a portable toilet and septic pumping business, and in September 1986 Coachella Valley Disposal, a rubbish hauling company who serviced the City of Indio. Palm Desert Disposal has also recently expanded its lines of business _ to include temporary fencing, mobile office trailers, and temporary power poles . In 1985 Palm Desert Disposal had 58 collection vehicles, today they have more than one hundred. CURRENT ACTIVITIES: Palm Desert Disposal currently services the following: 46, 011 Residential Customers 6, 910 Commercial Bins 1, 250 Construction Rolloff Bins 568 Portable Toilet Units 25 Office Trailers Assorted Temporary Fences and Power Pole Jobs Palm Desert Disposal is centrally located in the Coachella Valley and currently serves the following communities: Palm Desert, Rancho Mirage,Cathedral City, La Quinta, Indian Wells, Indio and unincorporated areas of the county around the Coachella Valley. THE FUTURE: The aquisition of these subsidiaries in conjunction with the positive growth pattern of the Coachella Valley nesessitate the expansion of the current facilities to allow for an orderly and planned growth of Palm Desert Disposal as well as continuing its policy of providing efficient and competitive services to the communities it serves . J� As additional communities grow in the valley and surrounding areas it is currently envisioned that Palm Desert Disposal would be able to service the area bordered by Sky Valley to the north, the San Jacinto Mountains to the south, the City of Coachella to the east, and Palm Springs to the west. Any service beyond that area would probably require other facilities. As stated previously Palm Desert Disposal currently services 46, 000 residences and 6, 900 commercial bins with its rubbish hauling operation. This service is handled by 26 refuse vehicles. We see the growth of the Valley, based on Chamber of Commerce figures and studies, as listed below. CURRENT POPULATION S: yeazs 15 years PALM DESERT 16 , 500 23 ,700 48,800 RANCHO MIRAGE 91500 13,600 28,100 INDIO 40, 000 57, 400 118, 400 OTHERS 47,500 68,200 140,500 Based on these population projections an additional 8 residential trucks and 4 commercial trucks would be required in five years and as many as 36 additional residential trucks and 19 commercial trucks in 15 years. This is based on the assumption that Palm Desert Disposal will continue to service 40.5% of the population and using industry standards of one residential truck servicing 2500 residences and one commercial truck for every 700 bins. The level of construction activity in the Coachella Valley is expected to increase over the next 15 years to accommadate the growth projections listed above. It is expected that there will be fluctuations in this projection. The following list shows the required inventory to meet these construction needs. CURRENT 5 years 15 years BINS 1, 250 1,795 3 , 700 TRAILERS 25 36 74 TOILETS 560 800 1, 660 FACILITY REQUIREMENTS: The expansion of the Palm Desert Disposal facility at 41-575 Eclectic Street has been planned with the satisfying of neighbor' s concerns as well as maintaining security and traffic flow for efficient and safe operations . It also recognizes the quality of development within the Industrial park and the expansion has been designed to compliment those surrounding facilities. Some of these plans include: 1. An 8 ' high slump stone wall with interior screen walls 2 . Upgraded landscaping and concreted throughout 3 . Employee parking relocated to expansion a. This is important because it allows the route truck parking to stay within the existing walls of the facility 4. Expansion area uses include: a. Construction services storage b. Enlarged washdown area . C. Sweeper cleanout d. Spare truck storage e. Employee parking area 5 . Office and maintenance expansion will be on existing property and will blend architectually to the existing facility, with upgraded landscaping. This expansion of the physical property is projected to contain safely and efficiently the 15 year growth pattern indicated previously. SUMMMY: Palm Desert Disposal is looking to the future and planning to provide trash hauling and temporary construction services to Palm Desert and the surrounding valley with competitive prices and state of the art efficiency as the valley grows. Palm Desert Disposal is a service oriented company whose growth and success must compliment the needs and requirements of a growing modern community. Palm Desert Disposal works hard to provide community support in enviromental issues and other interests of its people. The expansion of the facility is in an area specifically zoned and set aside by the City to accommadate such service industries as what Palm Desert, Disposal provides for the community. . Proposed screening will limit visual pollution from surrounding properties in a positive way. Traffic will not be adversley affected. This expansion is not a health hazard. CITY OF PALM DESERT TRANSMITTAL LETTER 1. TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council II. REQUEST: Appeal of a Planning Commission denial for a 4.74 acre expansion to a parking/storage area and a 5400 square foot second story addition to an existing structure for a trash hauling and disposal company located in a S. I . zone on the south side of Lennon Place between Eclectic and Corporate Way. I1I . APPLICANT: PALM DESERT DISPOSAL HOWARD PARCELL 41575 Eclectic Street 4815 Main Street Palm Desert, CA 92260 Yorba Linda, CA 92686 IV. CASE NO: PP 16-83, Amendment #1 V. DATE: July 23, 1987 V1. CONTENTS: A. Staff recommendation B. Discussion C. Draft Resolution/Ordinance No. D. Planning Commission Minutes involving Case No. E. Planning Commission staff report dated F. Related maps and/or exhibits. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ A. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve Request by adoption of Resolution No. B. DISCUSSION: The original request consisted of a 7 acre expansion in addition to the second story addition to their existing structure. The expansion acreage was reduced after a Planning Commission continuance and a meeting with adjacent property owners. Staff feels that through proper landscaping the expansion will not be significantly detrimental to adjacent properties and has felt that it would not significantly impact the environment as compared to the existing facility. /hs 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE(619) 346-0611 July 2, 1987 CITY OF PALM DESERT ) `LEGAL NOTICE f 1 CASE NO. PP 16.83, AMENDMENT pl NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held before the Palm Desert City Council to consider PALM DESERT DISPOSAL's appeal of a Planning Commission denial for plans of a 4.74 acre expansion to a parking/storage area and a 5400 square foot 'second story addition to an existing structure for a trash hauling and disposal company with a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact located in a service industrial zone on the south side of Lennon Place between Eclectic and Corporate rWay, also described as A.P.N.'s 624-290-038 (existing facility) and 624-290-018, 040 8 041 (expansion). - 9, Z 5S. R.6£. rR'"'c/siciJ PCP.. C/TY CF PALM CESERr G/ana O/3Y/i ` C4 v+� - ¢ 1 4 HI va s..v C eza ae . rvv.w zre�.JJ''"I / orK N a ivi p evr ® 36C j veaa q1/O IC S./01 S./O K. __ M1 ,O „ av9,� vv ♦ yee¢' Por 6St GQ o •®Pub il�\Ov6.9Lv 0.ic». � /_6x. C 69C n' ira'r+Qiivr_ n 9v. // ' s ^ 6. LENNCN ©Leer. I„I � I e z l• .no/+ + •, � c.r. or avrr vs,evr r ..v/rs ...,un I...o>•o .vr �9110 <ev I C7 i SAID public hearing will be held on Thursday, July 23. 1987 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber at the Palm Desert City Hall. 73-510 Fred Waring Orivs. Palm Desert, California, at which t1me. and place all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. If you challenge the proposed actions in court. you may be limited to raising only those Issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the city council (or planning commission) at, or Prior to, the public hearing. PUBLISH: Desert Post SHEILA R. GILLIGAN, City Clerk July 10, 1987 City of Palm Desert, CA ,t 73-510 FRED WARING univis,PALM uE srRr,CALIrONNlA 02260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 - April 17, 1987 - - CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE CASE NO. PP 16-83 Amendment ql NOTICE 15 HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by HOWARD PARSELL (for Palm Desert Disposal) for approval of a seven acre expansion to a parking and storage area and a second story addition to an existing structure (5400 square feet) for a trash hauling and disposal company with a negative declaration of - environmental Impact located on the south side of Lennon Place between Eclectic and Corporate Way, more particularly described as: APN's 624-290-03B (existing) 624-290-018 thru 020, 040 and 041 foQ, 'k r v' .. 1— y--HOVLEY .. . .µ—LN- o®c + .�j utSR e K Np ier Fe 4 >i yry ® _' y 1 4 J nC Q . ©OSa IL; ¢ p r �� AS OOC }r0 L lrOC R I M1 (D e ^, O O O ® ] 0i' 1 0 Og a .i/a OPov po r. 1u-11 _ --LENNON L or J � F, U nt ree ,r o ].ni ©-o.a..n C2oesm. r L. �o �61O : .. 15 _ I i SAID public hearing will be held on Tuesday, May 5, 1987 at 7:00 p.m. In the Council Chamber at the Palm Desert City Hall, 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all interested persons are ' invited to attend and be heard. If you challenge the proposed actions In court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else .raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or In written correspondence delivered to the city council (or planning commission) at, or Prior to, the�publtc hearing. PUBLISH: Desert Post RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary : April 24, 1987 Palm Desert Planning Commission I I'll,orl RT� � Ln a private mobile home resort 42500 Portola Avenue Palm Desert, California 92260 (.619)r346-5481 JUN 2 2 1987 June 17, 1987COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF PALM DESERT City of Palm Desert Ramon A. Diaz, Secretary Palm Desert Planning Commission 73510 Fred Waring Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 Dear Sirs: We in Portola Country Club have just been informed of the request of Palm Desert Disposal to expand their facilities on the south side of Lennon Place between Eclectic and Corporate Way. We wish to go on record as being opposed to this expansion. Several of our Board Members and Homeowners have inspected the site. We were not aware that the Disposal Company had been allowed in there previously (11-15-83) and are storing some trucks and rental (Port-o-lets) toilets at the present time. We do know that there has been a great increase in biting flies and we are sure that unless stringent rules are placed on the Disposal Company we can expect more. Sincerely, PORTOLA C TRY CLUB HOMEOWNE SSOCIATION Roger V. an ner President CC: BOD SENTINEL tit-UN .. 0Z 3T 3 12' 1 VUa•i �,� _^ 1 10041 RENO NV O6-01 0-/4 .. P Iic.�vULI ./ "< -rc 61 q m68 HRS 9A - 6P PDT M-F SUN ?_ 1987 '--- 4-()48+?2--SI52 06/01 f87 co Mu"cif lrt ) Pv".LNl otvaeiMLNi` CALM D[�P[ ICS IPMRNCZ CSP 217-•'755265 FRP TDRN TORRANCE CA 951 u6-01 0922P EST PMS PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION RPT DLY MGM, DLR IMMY 9AM, DLR ATTN. PLANNING DEPT 73-510 FRED WEARING DR, PALM DESERT CA 9'2'260 WE ARE OWNERS OF A COMMERCIAL &UILLrING AT 74-804 JONI DRIVE PALM DESERT AND ARE STRONGLY OPPOSED TO THE FLAN OF THE PALM DESERT DISPOSAL TO OPERATE A TRANSFER STATION IN THE VALLEY INDUSTRIAL PARK AREA. THE PROPOSED TRANSFER STATION WOULD CERTAINLY DISTROY PROPERTY VALUES IN THE V. I .F. AREA. YOURS TRULY LOUIS AND KENNETH SILVER 1;J!5 V i A LOS ALTOS REDONDO BEACH CA 90277 21::4 EST (EX/ 240) , pE` '1 t I ' PO 4 r,R5-1�1 RENO NV 06-01 't'lb P PDT RENA -`• Er 1 Sy ca Ea 1 �G�htT " RANCHO MIRAGE CA 9 AM TO 6 .PM PDT i *'7 i At TO Be 4—t>424<.,5I5a O(1i01 .'67 @2 J - ICS IPMRNCZ CSP -'1_b-•61171 FRB TDRN LYNWObfl "�A;.�,1'„pk��1 0612P EST PMS PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION RP7 DlY MGM, DLFt CITY OF PALM DESERT 7 -510 FRED WARING DR PALM DESERT DEAR PLANNING COMMISSION AS AN OWNER ON INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL PROPERTY IN VA1_LEY INDUSTRIAL PARK I AM OPPOSED TO PALM DESERT. WASTE DISPOSAL OPtRATINU A TRANSFER STATION AS FART OF THEIR. EXPANSION. 7HI5 WOULD ONLY WORK. AGAINST ALL THE DEVELOPMENT AND PROGRESS THAT PALM DESERT IS: VETTING IFJ THIS AREA, I URGE YOU TO TURN YOURS VERY TRULY, DOWN THIS EYPANBION. EZN KRINITT SFILZAR FURNITURE MFG CO) 2828 BUTLER AVE LYNWOOD CA 910262 1816 EST CITY OF PALM DESERT TRANSMITTAL LETTER 1. TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council 11 . REQUEST: Appeal of a Planning Commission denial for a 4.74 acre expansion to a parking/storage area and a 5400 square foot second story addition to an existing structure for a trash hauling and disposal company located in a S. I . zone on the south side of Lennon Place between Eclectic and Corporate Way. Ill. APPLICANT: PALM DESERT DISPOSAL HOWARD PARCELL 41575 Eclectic Street 4815 Main Street Palm Desert, CA 92260 Yorba Linda, CA 92686 1V. CASE NO: PP 86-13, Amendment #1 V. DATE: July 23, 1987 VI. CONTENTS: A. Staff recommendation B. Discussion C. ' Draft Resolution/Ordinance No. D. Planning Commission Minutes involving Case No. E. Planning Commission staff report dated F. Related maps and/or exhibits. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ A. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve Request by adoption of Resolution No. 8. DISCUSSION: The original request consisted of a 7 acre expansion in addition to the second story addition to their existing structure. The expansion acreage was reduced after a Planning Commission continuance and a meeting with adjacent property owners. Staff feels that through proper landscaping the expansion will not be significantly detrimental to adjacent properties and has felt that it would not significantly impact the environment as compared to the existing facility. /hs A MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION APRIL 14, 1987 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of four single story apartments. LOCATION: South side Shadow Mtn. Drive 500 feet west of Portola. ZONE: Commissioner Holden recommended that landscaping other than gravel be used. Commissioner Cook indicated that the garages looked like they would be a tight fit. He stated that they have to be 10 foot clear space. It was moved by Chairman Gregory, seconded by Commissioner Drury to grant preliminary approval subject to the following conditions. 1 . Parking to be design to meet city code. 2. Garages to be at least 10 foot clear space. 3. Building #4 to be pushed back to allow for breezeway between garages. 4. Landscape plan including landscape buffer at refuse area to be submitted for approval . Carried 5-0 3. CASE NO: PP 16-83 Amendment #1 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) : PALM DESERT DISPOSAL, 41575 Eclectic Street, Palm Desert, CA 92260; HOWARD PARCELL, 4815 Main Street, Yorba Linda, CA 92686. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of expansion to parking and storage area and a second story addition. LOCATION: South side of Lennon Place between Eclectic and Corporate Way. ZONE: S. I . Mr. Diaz noted that the applicant needed approval of the property owner's association and that they are required to provide a wall around the trash/storage area. 6 I MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION APRIL 14, 1987 The applicant explained that the property owner's association had no concerns with the building or the wall but they did with the transfer station. It was moved by Commissioner Holden, seconded by Commissioner McCrea to grant conceptual approval . Carried 4-0 4. CASE NO: PP 87-9 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) : FRED VEIGA, 640 N. Tustin Avenue #105, Santa Ana, CA 92705; BILL ROSSWORN, 41530 Woodhaven Drive E, Palm Desert, CA 92260. , NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of two 2-story fourplex apartments. LOCATION: Southwest corner Shadow Hills and Driftwood Drive. ZONE: R-3 Mr. Joy explained that the proposed building is almost identical to existing surrounding buildings and reviewed changes that had been made. Commissioner Cook asked if staff had any concerns with the 10 foot setback from,the curb. Mr. Joy indicated that staff had no concerns and that there was no landscape plan submitted as of yet. It was moved by Commissioner McCrea, seconded by Commissioner Holden to grant preliminary approval subject to a landscape plan being submitted for approval . Carried 5-0 IV. DISCUSSION ITEMS: None V. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: None VI. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 2: 10 p.m. STEVE—S ITH, Asso late Planner /dlg 7 i RESOLUTION NO. , f A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PRECISE PLAN OF DESIGN AMENDMENT TO ALLOW A 4.74 ACRE EXPANSION TO A PARKING STORAGE AREA AND A SECOND STORY ADDITION TO AN EXISTING STORAGE FOR A TRASH HAULING AND DISPOSAL COMPANY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF LENNON PLACE BETWEEN ECLECTIC AND CORPORATE WAY. CASE NO: PP 16-83 AMENDMENT #1 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 23rd day of July, 1987, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider the request of PALM DESERT DISPOSAL for approval of the above mentioned request; and WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedure for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 80-89 in that the director of community develop- ment has determined that the project will not have a significant impact on the environment and a negative declaration is hereby certified, and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said planning commission did find the following facts and reasons to exit to justify granting approval of said precise plan: 1 . The use has previously been determined to be acceptable at this location. 2. Since the time of the original plan approval office/industrial projects have been approved in the area. The project may be detrimental to some extent on property values but not substantially while the use will be low in terms of marking which could benefit the area if parking problems occur. 3. The facility is under county health permits which protects the health concerns etc. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Counci 1 of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1 . That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the commission in this case. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2. That approval of Precise Plan 16-83 Amendment #1 is hereby granted for reasons subject to the attached conditions. 3. That a negative declaration of environmental impact is hereby approved. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert City Council , held on this 23rd day of July, 1987, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RICHARD KELLY, Mayor ATTEST: SHEILA GILLIGAN, City Clerk City of Palm Desert, CA As 2 RESOLUTION NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO. PP 16-83 Amendment #1 Department of Community Development: 1. The development of the property shall conform substantially with exhibits on file with the department of community development, as modified by the following conditions. 2. Construction of a portion of said project shall commence within one year from the date of final approval unless an extension of time is granted; otherwise said approval shall become null , void and of no effect whatsoever. 3. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein which are in addition to all municipal ordinances and state and federal statutes now in force, or which hereafter may be in force. 4. Prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contemplated by this approval , the applicant shall first obtain permits and/or clearance from the following agencies: Riverside County Department of Health Palm Desert Architectural Commission City Fire Marshal Coachella Valley Water District Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to the department of building and safety at the time of issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. 5. Applicant agrees to pay reasonably fees for future improvements to Cook Street. 6. Applicant to pay applicable fees for Art in Public Places program. 7. Applicant to pay applicable lizard fees. 8. No residential trash trucks to use Lennon Place. 9. Landscaping to be upgraded throughout the site and include interior landscaping where adjacent to private property. 3 RESOLUTION NO. Department of Public Works: 1 . Complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the city engineer for checking and approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. The engineer shall submit "as-built" plans prior to the acceptance of the improvements by the city. 2. All private driveways and parking lots shall be inspected by the engineering department and a standard inspection fee shall be paid prior to grading permit issuance. 3. Landscaping maintenance on Lennon Place and Corporate Way shall be provided by the property owner. 4. Complete grading plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the city engineer for checking and approval prior to issuance of any permits. 5. Offsite improvement plans to be approved by public works department and a surety posted to guarantee the required offsite improvements prior to grading permit issuance. 6. Size, number and location of driveways to public works specifications with only one driveway approach from Lennon Place to be allowed to service this property. 7. Original conditions apply as per Planning Commission Resolution for Precise Plan 16-83. 8. Any and all offsite improvements shall be preceded by the approval of plans and the issuance of valid encroachment permits by the department of public works. 9. Applicant shall secure reciprocal ingress and egress access easements from the owner of parcels 18, 1 and 2. City Fire Marshali. 1 . Additional fire protection requirements may be necessary when the applicant submits specific plans for consideration and approval . 2. All buildings over 5000 square feet require an approved fire sprinkler system. /hs 4 I UU r CITY OF PALM DES._.cT P.O. BOX 1977 _ - PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92261 a + a ■ a w a w a a a w + a w ♦ r ■ w + w + • w r r. w a w a + ♦ w APPLICATION TO APPEAL DECISION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO THE DENIAL . ON CASE NO. PP-16-83, AMEND. #1 PALM DESERT DISPOSAL, INC. Name of Appellant P.O. BOX 3876, PALM DESERT, CA 92261-3876 324-1741 Address Phone _ Appealing decision of (date of meeting) JUNE 16, 1987 , 49B2 regarding application of (if same as Appellant, write "Same") cnua for (description of application) EXPANSION OF EXISTING FACILITY AND INSTA7LATION OF cmnRAaR AREA ON LAND ADJACENT TO EXISTZN FACZL.ITY_ Reasons for Appeal: SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "A" FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Date Appeal filed: to ,_2 ', PALM&TDL, INC. Fee Received:Public Hearing set for: BySignat Raymond P. Burke, General Manager Director of Environmental Services Date: JUNE 22, 1982 cc: Appellant Department of Environmental Services File w • a r • a ■ ■ a ■ • : + • ♦ r ■ w a + + r a ■ ■ w ■ + a : ■ a w (Complete and distribute after Public Hearing) COUNCIL ACTION cc: Appellant Dept./Environmental Services City Clerk Date• CITY OF PALM DESERT P.O. BOX 1977 PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92261 EXHIBIT "A" TO APPLICATION TO APPEAL DECISION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO THE DENIAL ON CASE NO. PP-16-83, AMEND. #1 The City Planning Staff recommended approval of our application subject to conditions to be imposed on the development for the protection of adjacent property owners. Those conditions were acceptable to us. The staff also recommended approval of a Negative Declaration. The Commission vote of denial appeared to be motivated by an alleged failure on the part of our consultants to supply adequate data to give projections of future growth. We and the consultants believed that they had reasonably complied with those requests. However, we have found nothing in the Palm Desert Planning Code which requires such data in order to obtain the approval of our present application. We believe the majority vote of the Commission was unreasonable and arbitrary and we request the City Council review this matter and overturn that decision and grant our application. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, DENYING APPROVAL OF PRECISE PLAN 16-83 AMENDMENT #1 LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF LENNON PLACE BETWEEN ECLECTIC AND CORPORATE WAY. CASE NO. PP 16-83 Amendment #1 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 5th day of May, 1987, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider the request of PALM DESERT DISPOSAL for a negative declaration of environmental Impact and approval of a seven acre expansion to existing parking and storage facilities and a second story 5400 square foot addition to an existing structure; and WHEREAS, said public hearing was continued to June 2, 1987, in order to permit the applicant to prepare for the commission a report identifying the long range plans of applicant relating to trash collection and other activities within the valley; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said planning commission did find the following facts and reasons to justify their actions, as described below: 1 . Palm Desert Disposal was unable to provide to the commission's satisfaction the information requested on May 5, 1987. 2. Without said information a majority of the commission was unable to properly determined if the proposed expansion was appropriately designed to address the concerns voiced by adjoining property owners and the property owners association. 3. Because positive findings could not be met a majority of the commission felt that approval of the request should not be granted. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1 . The requested Precise Plan Amendment is denied approval , and development or construction of any part thereof is also denied. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 16th day of June, 1987, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RICHARD ERWOOD, Chairman ATTEST: RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary /tm 2 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 5, 1987 Moved by Commissioner Downs . seconded by Commissioner Whitlock, adopting Planning Commission Resolution No, 1219, approving C/Z 87-5 and ZOA 87-2. Carried5-5-0. B. Case No. PP 16-83 �llmendment #1 - HOWARD PARCELL, PALM DESERT DISPOSAL, Appl-icant Request for approval of a seven acre expansion to a parking and storage area and a second story addition to an existing structure ('3400 square_ feet) for a trash hauling and disposal company with a negative declaration of environmental impact located on the south side of Lennon place between Eclectic and Corporate Way. Mr. Diaz outlined the salient points of the staff report and felt that the use was consistent with the intent of the service industrial zone. Fie suggested staff be directed to prepare a zoning ordinance amendment requiring a conditional use permit for the transfer station, noting that the transfer station use was not before the commission at this time for consideration and recommended approval , Chairman Erwood opened the public testimony and asked if 1.tie applicant wished to address the commission. MR. HOWARD PARCELL , 4815 Main Street, stated that he was present to answer any questions and clarified that on public works condition 46 that they were requesting only one driveway approach on Lennon, not two as indicated, He noted that there were two existing entrances on Eclectic_. Mr. Gaugush amended the condition to read, "Driveway entrance on Lennon Drive shall be limits to one driveway approach to be designed and approved by the publir works department. " is Chairman Erwood asked if anyone present wished to speak in FAVOR, or OPPOSITION to the proposed. MR . RICHARD ROMER , 74-090 El Pasco, stated that he was representing the Corporate venter Property Owners Association. He indicated that the three lots on the west end were subject to the CC&R's of the Corporate Center. He noted that. there had been poor communication between the property owners association, the property owner, and the city. Fie stated that portable toilets and open garbage were violations of the CCBR's. He also discussed the access points rand felt that the existing access on 3 M I,NUTE S PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 5, 1987 Eclectic should be expanded. lie felt there was a direct conflict in the staff report that stated that property values would not be depreciated and precise plan findings #5 of the staff report that states that the project may be detrimental to some extend on property values. He requested that staff take a closer look at the proposed and deny the application. Mr. Diaz indicated that only the three lots facing the center are covered by the association and asked who the applicant acquired the property from. He felt that the person who sold the property was aware of the expansion plans and part of the property owners association. Chairman Erwood felt the Corporate Center went into this with their eyes open. Mr. Romer stated that there was a subsequent buyer in between. Chairman Erwood felt that the city should not be put in the middle of this situation because the city was not part of the CC&R's. After further discussion Mr. Diaz directly asked Mr. Romer if the city would be named in a law suit if the proposal were to be approved. Mr . Romer answered that he could not say at this time. Commissioner Richards outlined the use of the service industrial zone, reviewed the history of the corprn-ate renter's existence and allowance of office uses in this area, and indicated that the service industrial businesses should be protected. MR. GEORGE BERKEY, Corporate Center Property Owners Association, stated that the expansion includes three and one-half acres in the Corporate Center. He indicated that he understood Mr. Richards comments, but felt that many properties in the area sold with the knowledge of the CC&R's. He expressed ronr_ern regarding the applicant ' s ability to effectively mitigate concerns from the expansion. He felt that Eclectic_ should be enlarged to handle the traffic flow and noisy garbage trucks and expressed skepticism regarding staff's determination that property values would not depreciate. He stated that any second floor views would be of trucks and portable tni lets and indicated that the applicant was aware of the association's CC&R's and if the city could not resolve thr- matter, then it would be resolved by the courts. He indicated that many people have invested in this area's property and suggested that the project be approved up to the point where the Corporate Center starts with proper screening and land;caoing and the exclusion of the portion within the CC&R's. Mr. Berkey stated that he felt that if the additional three and one-half acres were approved with the overall part of the project, existing property values would go clown. He stated that Mr. Burke was 4 i MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 5, 1987 informed of the regulations prior to close of esrrnw. He i indicated that the expansion would include 12 additional large trucks which would go out a day and 15Ci small trash truck, going in. He felt that if the expansion were approved, it would just be a step closer to the approval of the transfer station. He j also stated that the landscaping does not cover the wall /trucks now. MR. JAMES RUE, 71-457 Cholla Way, owners of lots 22 and 23, expressed concern regarding property line height and an appropriate wall height to screen his property. He also expressed concern regarding property values. Mr. Parcell indicated that grading plans would be done, but would not screen views from a second story. After further discussion , Commissioner Downs suggested that the office building be approved separately and a readvertisement be done for the rernainding portion. Commissioner Richards noted that at the previous meeting the applicant and staff were directed to provide the commission more material with projection figures as to capacity and length of time before an additional expansion would be required. He also felt that commission should have all the facts on the CC8R's. Chairman Erwood asked commission to consider the fact that a developer was given something he was not entitled to when putting office uses in this area and suggested that developers be made _aware that no office conversions will be permitted in the service industrial zone in the future. MR. BERKEY asked about the expanded use for trash and protection thereof . Mr . Parcell replied that the association' s architectural commission had approved their screen wall . Commissioner Richards indicated that he would like to make a motion continuing this case for one month with the understanding that further continuance would be given if needed. Mr. Parcell concurred with the continuance. MR. ART Mr_KAY, 73-700 Grapevine, representing Mr . Marguleas, read a letter in opposition which heretofore will be made a part hereof as Exhibit "A." MS. ELEANOR FALK, property owner and partner of Mr. Marq_uleas, also read a letter in opposition, which will heretofore be made: part hereof as Exhibit "B. " She also expressed the opinion that since the city does business with Palm Desert Disposal , 5 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 5, 1987 there is a conflict of interest. She felt that an environmental impact report was needed. Chairman Erwood asked if anyone else wished to speak; there being no one, he asked for a motion of continuance. Action- Moved by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner Whitlock, continuing PP 16-83 Amendment #1 to June 2, 1987. Carried 5-0. C.. Case Nos. PP 87-12 and PM 22479 - DAVE MANOOKIAN, Applicant Request for approval of a precise plan of design, parcel map and negative declaration of environmental impact to ronsolidate eight existing lots into three contiouous lots to facilitate construction of a 34 unit. (2 story) apartment project on the R-3 zoned property located at the northeast corner of San Pablo and Catalina Way. Mr . Smith outlined the salient points of the staff report and indicated that the project had received preliminary architectural approval . Staff recommended approval . Chairman Erwood opened the public testimony and asked if the applicant wished to address the commission. MR. BERNIE LEUNG, architect, explained that the project Has a veryc low floor area ratio and described the architecture of the proposed building. Chairman Erwood asked if anyone present wished to speak in FAVOR or OPPOSITION to the proposed. MR. DAVE MANOOKIAN, applicant, indicated that this action would allow him the ability to sell in the future, even though this was not his plan. He noted that this would also allow the other property to have their own pool . Chairman Erwood closed the public testimony. Action: Moved by Commissioner Downs , seconded by Commissioner Picharris, adopting the findings as presented by staff. Carried 9-0. 6 HOWARO P. MARGULEAS P. O. Box 1028 COACHELLA, CA 92236 619-398-6181 4 May 1987 Palm Desert Planning Omission City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 Attention Commission Members: As a member of Bob Hope Cultural Center Board of Trustees and its Executive Committee, a member of the Eisenhower Medical Center Board of Trustees, a member of the Boys Clubs of America National Board, and I will become Chairman of the Board of Directors of the California Chamber of Commerce in September, I would like to express the following. I mention the above affiliations for the sole purpose of clearly identifying that I am a civic minded person interested and deeply concerned with the ongoing welfare and permanent well-being of our desert community. I will be in New York at the time of your hearing, therefore, I have asked Art McKay to present my thoughts on the subject of case #PP16-83, amendment #1. I unequivocally state I am not opposed to progress and readily appreciate and realize full well the importance of all the services vital to the well-being of our community. With great civic pride I have watched the development of such high quality properties as the Desert Springs Marriott hotel and the many newly designed attractive buildings in the Corporate Center Park. The possibility of allowing a garbage business to now became the major landmark of this other- wise outstanding development causes great concern and apprehension -- in fact, it is absolutely offensive. The developer of the industrial park and representatives of the City of Palm Desert persuaded my partner, Elynor Falk, and myself to donate to the city (at no renumeration to us) an additional 20.feet on the 42nd Street frontage, creating an improved alignment for the existing road. This free gift on our part today represents approximately $100,000. We agreed to the developer's and the city's request in our desire to be good citizens and because we are conscientious and truly care about the area. We most certainly would not have made the donation if we would have been told that this gift was to facilitate the expansion of a garbage business. If this application goes forward -= we want the gift of our land back! A full scale E.I.R. should be required in any case. This report should include the effect that this garbage expansion proposal would have on each individual's property encompassing the entire area and the further effect it would have on each individual's business in the existing tract. It should certainly include the effect the expansion would have on property such as ours on 42nd and Corporate Way which is presently zoned for multiple ' Palm Desert Planning Commission 4 May 1987 -- Page Two housing. I an sure the health department should be involved in evaluating the air, noise and sanitary conditions. Consideration should be given by the garbage company to moving the existing location of their company to a lesser dense area. One has only to drive by the garbage company and look through the chain link fence as the business exists today. It is certainly not a very pleasant experience to view property on which millions have been spent to beautify, and then, to came upon the dozens upon dozens of garbage trucks lined up along the chain link fence. Addi- tionally, the hundreds of outhouses located in the garbage company's yard as well as the"honey wagons"that service people who have trouble with their septic tanks are clearly evident. It is my opinion that all of those lumbering awkward garbage trucks would create a safety hazard in the immediate vicinity both coning and going. At the very least they would disturb the aesthetics of the area. Based upon the present zoning that we have on our 40 acre property, it would create a great disturbance to the population of the mobile hone park and would adversely affect our property values. I strongly urge you to dec this expansio permit. Yours truly and Marguleas HPM/kh r" 4 MAY 1987 TO THE MEMBERS OF THE PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION: I, ELYNOR FALK, PERSONALLY WENT TO THE GARBAGE BUSINESS ON MONDAY, MAY 4, 1987, AT 5:30 A.M. . . THE MEN WERE FIRING UP THEIR EQUIPMENT AND LEAVING FOR COLLECTIONS. I HEARD, I SAW, AND I GI'TTE THE POLLUTANTS MENTIONED IN MY PARTNER'S LEZTER, AND I AGREE WITH EVERYTHING THAT MR. MARGULEAS HAS STATED. I ASKED ONE OF THE MEN HOW MANY TRUCKS THEY OPERATED AND HE ESTIMATED ABOUT 80. IT IS HARD FOR ME TO BELIEVE THAT THIS EXPANSION IS FOR ONLY ADDITIONAL STORAGE. AT ANY RATE, THEIR STORAGE YARD APPEARED ADEQUATE TO ME. THERE WAS PLENTY OF ROOM NEXT TO THE OUTHOUSES AND"HONEY WAGONVTO PARK MORE TRUCKS. SO I WOULD ASK, WHAT EXACTLY DO THEY NOW HAVE IN MIND AND WHAT IS IT THAT THEY ARE PLANNING TO DO IN THE FUTURE THAT THEY NEED 7 ACRES OF LAND? I WAS PUZZLED BY THE VARIOUS PIECES OF EQUIPMENT AND BUILDINGS THAT I OBSERVED AT THE GARBAGE COMPANY'S PLACE OF BUSINESS AND SO NATURALLY THE QUESTION COMES TO MIND, WHAT EXACTLY DO THEY DO, WHAT IS THEIR BUSINESS NOW, AND WHAT IS IT EXPECTED TO BE IN THE FUTURE? MR. HOWARD MARGULEAS, MY PARTNER, WHO HEADS UP AN INTERNATIONAL AGRIBUSINESS COMPANY CALLED SUN WORLD INTERNATIONAL, HAS BEEN PLANNING TO MOVE HIS CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS FROM BAKERSFIELD TO THE VALLEY REGION. IN VIEW OF THE FINE DEVELOPMENTS AROUND 42ND AND CORPORATE WAY, I HAVE BEEN TRYING TO CONVINCE HIM TO LOCATE HIS OFFICES ON OUR 40 ACRES ADJOINING THE CORPORATE CENTER BUSINESS PARK. `HUNDREDS OF PEOPLE WOULD HAVE BEEN TRANSFERRED FROM OTHER PLACES TO HEADQUARTER AT THIS LOCATION. THESE.HIGH QUALITY PEOPLE AND THEIR FAMILIES WOULD HAVE BEEN AN ASSET. TO THE CITY OF PALM DESERT. IT IS A KNOWN FACT THAT PEOPLE WANT TO LOCATE CLOSE TO THEIR PLACE OF EMPLOY- MENT. IF THE PLANNERS OF THIS CITY DON'T EXERT ENOUGH FARSIGHTEDNESS TO REALIZE THAT ENLARGING THIS GARBAGE COMPANY IN THE CENTER OF THE FINEST MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION 5 MAY 1987 - PAGE TWO BY: ELYNOR FALK DEVELOPMENT IN THE AREA WILL AUTOMATICALLY CANCEL THE BENEFITS THAT COULD HAVE RESULTED, IT WILL BE A TRAGEDY. THERE IS SOMETHING ELSE THAT I WOULD LIKE TO MENTION AND THAT IS THAT I HAVE FOUND OUT THAT MONEY AND SERVICES ARE TRADED BETWEEN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT AND THIS GARBAGE COMPANY. IT APPEARS TO ME THAT THERE CAN BE A CONFLICT OF INTEREST IN THE CITY'S STAFF ENCOURAGING THIS FXPANSION BY RECOAENDING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION. I DON'T FEEL THAT ALL THE FACTS REGARDING AN E.I.R. OR A NEGATIVE DECLARATION CAN BE FAIRLY CONSIDERED BY PEOPLE WHO DO BUSINESS TOGETHER. I ASK THAT THE MEMBERS OF THE .PLANNING COPMHISSION REPUDIATE THE STAFF'S NEGATIVE DECLARATION RECOMMENDATION AND REQUIRE A FULL SCALE PROFESSIONAL E.I.R. IF THERE IS THE SLIGHTEST CHANCE THAT THIS EXPANSION REQUEST WILL HAVE FURTHER CONSIDERATION. YOURS TRULY, mil/F�Aei� EL R FALK ''5 OWNER OF 40 ACRES ON 42ND AND CORPORATE WAY CITY OF PALM DESERT DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission DATE: May 5, 1987 CASE NO: PP 16-83 Amendment #1 REQUEST: Approval of a seven acre expansion to a parking and storage area and a second story addition to an existing structure (5400 square feet) for a trash hauling and disposal company with a negative declaration of environmental impact located on the south side of Lennon Place between Eclectic and Corporate Way. APPLICANT: PALM DESERT DISPOSAL HOWARD PARCELL 41575 Eclectic Street 4815 Main Street Palm Desert, CA 92260 Yorba Linda, CA 92686 I. BACKGROUND: The seven acre expansion consists of five lots fronting on Lennon Place rough graded with curb and gutter. The three westernmost of which being within the Corporate Industrial Park landscaped along the street frontage and the easternmost two not included in this association, on of which presently being utilized for storage and employee parking. The existing facilities approved by the planning commission 11/15/83 comprise 3.2 acres at the southwest corner of Eclectic Street and Lennon Place, also outside the jurisdiction of the industrial park. The site is surrounded by S. I . zoning to the north, across Lennon, by five separate office/industrial projects which have been recently completed or nearing completion, one of which includes a 3,000 square foot restaurant (Gretta's) at the northwest corner of Eclectic and Lennon; to the south extending east to west by a vacant lot, Armored Transport building, cement truck wash-out facility, two vacant lots and a landscape and irrigation supply facility; to the east by Eclectic Street and a mini-warehouse project; and to the west by Corporate Way and three vacant lots with approved plans for a two story office/industrial project. 1I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The plan as submitted primarily consists of two main parts. The building addition will make the existing building entirely two story with the exception of a small single story building addition the applicant is contemplating in the rear. The existing single story building can not structurally hold a second floor so the addition will be tied directly to the ground straddling the ground floor. The architectural commission has approved these plans. PP 16-83 AMENDMENT #1 The parking and storage area is designed to match the existing area with a 8 foot slump stone wall and landscaping to screen. The architectural commission has specified that the landscaping be increased for the existing facilities also. The new landscaping staff will be concentrating to screen equipment that exceeds the 8 foot height of the wall instead of the wall itself. The two lots on Lennon Place would require sidewalk since they're not in the Corporate Industrial , however staff feels they are not necessary here since one of the lots has already been landscaped and the one remaining would be by itself. The south portion of the storage area is devoted to employee parking and will be asphalt as will be the remainder of the site. The two westernmost lots call for future development which will be reviewed as expanded storage area as part of this application with any new buildings to be reviewed at a later date. The plans call for access onto Lennon Place via a 50 foot wide driveway, since the gates to the yard will invariably be open all day the applicant has presented plans for a secondary offset screen wall with extra landscaping to further screen the yard. Approximately a year ago the disposal company acquired a chemical toilet rental business (Port-O-Let) that is also headquartered at this location. These facilities are under county permit and must be flushed out prior to storage. At time of application the applicant inquired about a transfer station. Since these plans for expansion don't hinge on the transfer station this matter will be dealt with at a later date through the conditional use permit process. Ill . ANALYSIS: A. Project meets all applicable zoning standards. The following precise plan findings must be made. 1 . The precise plan is consistent with the intent and purpose of the service industrial zone and the Palm Desert General Plan. 2. The project's design will not depreciate or unreasonably interfere with the use or enjoyment of property in the vicinity. 3. The project will not endanger the public peace, health, safety or general welfare. The use has previously been determined to be acceptable at this location. 2 PP 16-83 AMENDMENT #1 it "51 Since the time of the original plan approval office/industrial d projects have been approved in the area. The project may be detrimental to some extent on property values but not substantially while the use will be low in terms of Daarking which could benefit the area if parking problems occur. 11 L4!1 The facility is under county health permits which protects the health concerns etc. B. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The director of community development has determined the project will have no significant environmental impact and a negative declaration is recommended for certification. IV. RECOMMENDATION: Approve findings and adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. approving PP 16-83 Amendment #1 subject to conditions. V. ATTACHMENTS: A. Draft Resolution B. Legal Notice Prepared by /96z Reviewed and Approved by /dlg 3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PRECISE PLAN OF DESIGN AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT TO ALLOW A SEVEN ACRE EXPANSION TO A PARKING AND STORAGE AREA .AND A SECOND STORY ADDITION TO AN EXISTING STRUCTURE LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF LENNON PLACE BETWEEN ECLECTIC AND CORPORATE WAY. CASE NO: PP 16-83 AMENDMENT #1 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 5th day of May, 1987 hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider the request of PALM DESERT DISPOSAL for approval of a negative declaration and precise plan of design for the above mentioned project. WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedure for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 80-89", in that the director of community develop- ment has determined that the project will have no environmental impact and a negative declaration has been prepared. WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said planning commission did find the following facts and reasons to exit to justify granting approval of said precise plan: 1 . The precise plan is consistent with the intent and purpose of the service industrial zone and the Palm Desert General Plan. 2. The project's design will not depreciate or unreasonably interfere with the use or enjoyment of property in the vicinity. 3. The project will not endanger the public peace, health, safety or general welfare. 4. The use has previously been determined to be acceptable at this location. 5. Since the time of the original plan approval office/industrial projects have been approved in the area. The project may be detrimental to some extent on property values but not substantially while the use will be low in terms of marking which could benefit the area if parking problems occur. 6. The facility is under county health permits which protects the health concerns etc. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1 . That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the commission In this case. RESOLUTION NO. 2. That approval of Precise Plan 16-83 Amendment #1 hereby granted for reasons subject to the attached conditions. 3. That a negative declaration of environmental impact is hereby approved. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 5th day of May, 1987, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RICHARD ERWOOD, Chairman ATTEST: RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary /dlg 2 RESOLUTION NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO. PP 16-83 Amendment #1 Department of Community Development: 1 . The development of the property shall conform substantially with exhibits on file with the department of community development, as modified by the following conditions. 2. Construction of a portion of said project shall commence within one year from the date of final approval unless an extension of time is granted; otherwise said approval shall become null , void and of no effect whatsoever. 3. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein which are in addition to all municipal ordinances and state and federal statutes now in force, or which hereafter may be in force. 4. Prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contemplated by this approval , the applicant shall first obtain permits and/or clearance from the following agencies: Riverside County Department of Health Palm Desert Architectural Commission City Fire Marshal Coachella Valley Water District Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to the department of building and safety at the time of issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. 5. Applicant agrees to pay reasonably fees for future improvements to Cook Street. 6. Applicant to pay applicable fees for Art in Public Places program. Department of Public Works: 1 . Complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the city engineer for checking and approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. The engineer shall submit "as-built" plans prior to the acceptance of the improvements by the city. 2. All private driveways and parking lots shall be inspected by the 3 RESOLUTION NO. engineering department and a standard inspection fee shall be paid prior to grading permit issuance. 3. Landscaping maintenance on Lennon Place and Corporate Way shall be provided by the property owner. 4. Complete grading plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the city engineer for checking and approval prior to issuance of any permits. 5. Offsite improvement plans to be approved by public works department and a surety posted to guarantee the required offsite improvements prior to grading permit issuance. 6. Size, number and location of driveways to public works specifications with only two driveway approaches to be allowed to service this property. 7. Original conditions apply as per Planning Commission Resolution for Precise Plan 16-83. 8. Any and all offsite improvements shall be preceded by the approval of plans and the issuance of valid encroachment permits by the department of public works. 9. Applicant shall secure reciprocal ingress and egress access easements from the owner of parcels 18, 19, 20, 1 and 2. City Fire Narshal : 1 . Additional fire protection requirements may be necessary when the applicant submits specific plans for consideration and approval . 2. All buildings over 5000 square feet require an approved fire sprinkler system. /dlg 4 l CASE NO. PP 16-83 6 Imo" 1`.•` Pt:W 06-83 _ I dale r e i it�;,, -rAc,/1 y J ENVIRONDiENTAL SERVICES DEPT. ✓ INITIAL STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION CHECKLIST NOTE: The availability of data necessary to address the topics listed below shall form the basis of a decision as to whether the application is considered complete for purposes of environmental assessment. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS - - (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers, possible mitigation measures and comments are provided on attached sheets). Yes Maybe No 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: - - a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in f/ geologic substructures? b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction, or _ overcovering of the soil? C. Change in topography or ground surface relief / features? d. The destruction, covering., or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? - e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of / soils, either on or off the site? 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? _ _ L�/ b. The creation of objectionable odors? I/ C. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any change in climate, - either locally or regionally? Z, ..... - . .. - Yes Maybe No 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: -- a...C.hanges in currents, or the course or - 1 direction of water'movements? b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? i c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? d. Alteration of.the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? e. Change in the quantity of ground waters, I either through direct additions or with- drawals, or through interception of an - aquifer by cuts or excavations? _ _ _ f. Reduction in the amount of water other- ✓ wise available for public water supplies? 4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or . numbers of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, and crops)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, ✓ or endangered species of plants? c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal ✓ replenishment of existing species? 5. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, or insects)? _ Ll b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or endangered species of animals? c. Introduction of new species of animals / into an area, or result in a barrier to ✓ the migration or movement of animals? - .- d. Deterioration to existing wildlife habitat? - - - 3. Yes Abe No 6. Natural Resources. Will the proposal -result in: a. Increase in:the rate of use of any natural - - resources? r —' b. Depletion ofeany non-renewable natural resource? 7. Enemy. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? — b. Demand upon existing sources of energy, or re- quire the.development of new sources of energy? S. Risk of UDset�>..Does the proposal involve a ' risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited / to, pesticides, oil, chemicals, or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? -.d c - - 9. Economic Loss. Will the proposal result in: - a a. A change in thevalue of property and L/ improvements endangered by flooding? t — — b. A change in the value of property and / improvementsrexposed to geologic hazards beyond accepted community risk standards? _ 10. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing - noise levels toethe point at which accepted community noise and vibration levels are exceeded? - :. 11. Land Use. Will ethe proposal result in the a t� eration of the present developed or v planned land use of an area? 12. Open space?Sac e. Will the proposal lead to a / decreasoe in the amount of designated open V - 13. Population. Will the proposal result in: a. Alteration of the location, distribution, density, or grmvth rate of the human l/ Population of- the City? b. Change in the population distribution by age, income,:4-eligion, racial, or ethnic group, occupational class, household type? — 4. Yes Maybe No 14. Emoloyment. Will the proposal result in j additional new long-term jobs provided, or a j change in the number and per cent employed, I unemployed, and underemployed? 15. Housing. Will the proposal result in: Q a. Change in number and per cent of housing units by type (price or rent range, { zoning category, owner-occupied and rental, / - etc.) relative to demand or to number of V families in various income classes in the City? i " b. Impacts on existing housing or creation of a ✓ demand for additional housing? IG. Trans gortation/Circulation. Will the proposal .` resu t in: / a. Generation of additional vehicular movement? " b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or / demand for new parking? c. Impact upon existing transportation systems? d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation / or movement of people and/or goods? e. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists, or pedestrians? - - 17. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for, new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: 1 / ' a. Fire protection? 'b. Police protection? C. Schools? _ _ 7 d. Parks or other recreational facilities? _ _ 7 e. Maintenance of public facilities,. including / roads? f. Other governmental services? • Yes Maybe Ho 18. Public fiscal Balance. Will the proposal result in anet change- in government. fiscal / flow (revenues less o V/ perating expenditures . and annualized capital expenditures)? _ 19. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a - need for new systems, or alterations to the 1 following utilities: " - a-. Poweror natural gas? b. Communications system? C. Water? d. Sewer or septic tanks? - 7 e. Storm water drainage? f. Solid waste and disposal? 20. Human Health. Will the proposal result in: a. The creation of any health hazard or / Potential health hazard? (/ b. A change in the level of community health care provided? 21. Social Services. Will the proposal result in - _ an increased denand for provision of general / social services? - J 22. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in: / a. Obstruction of any scenic vista or view V open to the public? b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive J site open to public view? C. Lessening of the overall neighborhood (or area) attractiveness, pleasantness, ✓/ and uniqueness? 23. Liaht and Glara. Will the proposal produce new i—`1 �ght o�glare? 24. Arche oloorical. Will the proposal re su t In ical/Histoan a tera[ion of a significant - archeological or historical site, structure, ((// object, or building? .. { 6. Yes Mbe No 25. Mandatory Findings of Significance. / a. Does the project have the potential to degrade J the quality of the environment or to curtail the diversity in the environment? b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental_goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time J while long-term impacts will endure well into / the future.) c. Does the project have impacts which are indi- vidually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) _ — d. Does the project have environmental effects t✓/// which will cause substantial adverse effects . . - on human beings, either directly or indirectly? _ _ Initial Study Prepared By: �` 4 ,// �ss ee,,Gg-Tt> f FINISHED AGENDA PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION APRIL 21 , 1987 Moved by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner Downs, adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 1218, approving PM 22499 subject to conditions as amended. Carried 5-0. IX. MISCELLANEOUS A. Case No. PP 16-83 Amendment #1 - PALM DESERT DISPOSAL, Applicant Request for clarification of use for the Palm Desert Disposal transfer station located on the south side of Lennon Place, between Eclectic and Corporate Way. Action: Commission determined that more information was needed and felt that a conditional use permit be appropriate. X. COMMENTS None. Xl . ADJOURNMENT Moved by Chairman Erwood, seconded by Commissioner Downs, adjourning the meeting. Carried 5-0. The meeting was adjourned at 9: 17 p.m. /tm 5 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 Date (� DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING AND SAFETY PRELIMINARY REVIEW OF PLANS TH I S r IS NOT A PLAN�gC.H�ECIQ ,\ I DEVELOPMENT: EP The comments below are based on the following assumptions and code groups: 1985 Uniform Building Code 1985 Uniform Plumbing Code 1985 Uniform Mechanical Code 1984 National Electrical Code Title 24 Handicapp / Accessibility Standards Title 24 Energy Conservation Standards Title 24 Multi-Family Adaptability Standards Code Assumption: Building Classification�}-� y Type of Construction !lam 1 Sprinklered Allowable Floor Area: Basic Allowable Setbacks Mao Sprinklered Multi-Story Factora- Total Allowable Sq.Ft. CHECKLIST ❑ Plans shall be prepared by a licensed California architect. Show current number on plans. Nl ❑ Submit a list of features proposed that show compliance to the multi- family handicapp regulations. Use a maximum cap of $740.00 per adapt- able dwelling unit. Page two. . . HANDICAPPED: I Site requirements per handicapp standards. PARKING: i i ❑ Show number of stalls required. ❑ Revise parking stall locations to allow main entry access. ❑ Show international logo, loading and unloading zone requirements. URamp from parking lot to sidewalk not shown on plans. BUILDING ACCESS: ❑ Doors shall be minimum 32" clear in width. ❑ Provide 18" space on the swing side of doors. ❑ On plans, show height of all bathroom accessories. L1 Handicapp bathroom layout does not conform to current standards. Before further comments can be made, additional plans and specifications are needed for review. The following plans must be submitted to the Department of Building 8 Safety for plan review: Architectural Drawings and Details. Structural Drawings and Calculations. Complete Electrical , Mechanical and Plumbing Plans and Specifications. Title 24 Energy Conservation Documentation Forms. COMMENTS: ELLER PRINCIPAL PLANS EXAMINER 9 SCHLECHT, SHEVLIN IS, SHOENBERGER JAMES M. SCHLECHT A LAW CORPORATION TELEPHONE 16191320-JI61 JOHN C. SHEVLIN LAWYERS TELECOPIER (6191 323-175B JON A, SHOENBERGER JOEL S. MILIBAND POST OFFICE BOX 1906 DANIEL T.JOHNSON BOI EAST TAHOUITZ WAY, SUITE 100 IN REPLY REFER TO JOSEPH A. GIBBS PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA 92263-1906 KIPP IAN LYONS' BONNIE GARLAND GUSS CRAIG ERICHSEN ALSO ADMITTED IN STATE OF WgS.MDTON June 10 , 1987 City of Palm Desert �3 ��s V L .._Jo City Hall 73-510 Fred Waring Drive JUN 1 0 1987 Palm Desert, CA 92260 NOY UtYLLVrP1 NI UEYARTMENI' -�--- CCMMU CITY Of PALM DESERT Attn: City Clerk ti RE: NOTICE OF APPEAL TO CITY COUNCIL OF A PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION Gentlemen: This letter is intended as a Notice of Appeal pursuant to the Palm Desert City Code from a decision of the Palm Desert Planning Commission in Case No. PP-16-83, Amendment No. 1, with the applicant as Palm Desert Disposal Company. At a hearing of the Commission on June 2 , 1987 by a vote of three to two, the Commission denied our client' s application for an expansion of its existing facility and installation of a storage area on land it owns immediately adjacent to its existing facility in Palm Desert. The City Planning Staff recommended approval of our client' s application subject to conditions to be imposed on the development for the protection of adjacent property owners. Those conditions were acceptable to our client. The staff also recommended approval of a Negative Declaration. The Commission vote of denial appeared to be motivated by an alleged failure on the part of our applicant ' s consultants to supply adequate data to give projections of future growth. The applicant' s consultants believed that they had reasonably complied with those requests. However, we would wish to point out there is nothing we have found in the Palm Desert Planning Code which requires such data in order to obtain the approval of our present application. We believe the majority vote of the Commission was unreasonable and arbitrary as it applies to our client and we request the City Council review this matter and overturn that decision and grant our client' s application. SCHLECHT, SHEVLIN & OENBERGER. A LAW CORPORATION LAWYERS June 10 , 1987 Page 2 When this has been put on an agenda for the City Council for a hearing, we would appreciate receiving notice as early as possible. Thank you for your cooperation. V ry truly yo s , i74�r JAMES M. SCHLECHT JMS/ct 28/49 cc : Raymond P. Burke CITY OF PALM DESERT INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Phil Joy FROM: Brent Conley RE: PP16-83 Amend #1 DATE: April 10, 1987 The lighting in the complex is extremely important for the security of the facility. The complex should be illuminated with the use of mercury vapor lighting to at least 2 foot candle, particularly by the new second story entrance. The exterior door should be made of steel construction, equipped with dead bolts and latch guards to prevent forcible entry. Brent Conley Crime Prevention Officer BC/rrt a 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 April 21 , 1987 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION ACTION CASE NO: PP 16-83 Amendment #1 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) : PALM DESERT DISPOSAL, 41575 Eclectic Street, Palm Desert, CA 92260; HOWARD PARCELL, 4815 Main Street, Yorba Linda, CA 92686. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of expansion to parking and storage area and a second story addition. LOCATION: South side of Lennon Place between Eclectic and Corporate Way. ZONE: S. I . ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Upon reviewing the submitted plans and presentations by staff and by the applicant, the architectural commission granted conceptual approval . Date of Action: April 14, 1987 Vote: Carried 4-0 (An appeal of the above action may be. made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen ( 15) days of the date of the decision. ) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ STAFF COMMENTS: Please read the attached minutes. SCHLECHT, SHEVLIN S SHOENBERGER JAMES M. SCHLECHT A LAW CORPORATION TELEPHONE (619) 320-7I61 JOHN C. SHEVLIN LAWYERS TELECOPIER (619) 323-1750 JON A. SHOENBERGER J OEL S. MILIBANO POST OFFICE BOX 1906 DANIEL T.JOHNSON BOI EAST TAHOUITZ WAY, SUITE 100 IN REPLY REFER TO JOSEPH A.GIRDS PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA 92263-1906 KIPP IAN LYONS• BONNIE GARLAND SUSS CRAIG ERICKSEN *ALSO ADMITTED IN STATE OF W HINGTON June 2 , 1987 City of Palm Desert WPFEL��E�C../ City Hall JON Z ISO 73-510 Fred Waring Drive OVII:,N10EPAR1MENi Palm Desert, CA 92260 CpMM�N111Tl v PALM OESERT Attn: Ray Diaz RE: PALM DESERT DISPOSAL Dear Mr. Diaz : This letter will confirm our prior discussions wherein we indicated we represent Palm Desert Disposal. On their behalf , we object to any requirement of doing an environmental impact report on their present application. We understand the concerns of the adjacent property owners but we believe those concerns can readily be addressed by the City imposing such conditions as it deems reasonable to its approval of our client' s application. Our client purchased property in an industrial zoned subdivision. If the City requires an environmental impact report for our client' s application, it would seem that the City would have to do the same thing for all other applications in this industrial tract. That would be just as unreasonable as we believe it is unreasonable to impose such a condition on our client. we urge the adoption of a negative declaration with such mitigation conditions as the City Planning Commission feels reasonable. Thank you for your cooperation. U ry truly yours, MES M. SCHLECHT S/ct /36 Raymond P. Burke - IDATRICIA (CORKY) LARSON _c�gNrr Supervisor. Fourth District -rsi-vE.ns' n COUNTY OF DIVEDSIDE June 1, 1987 JUN 2 1987 Mr. Ramon Diaz COMMDRCITYDO1FPALM0DESERTANIMElVi City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Dr. Palm Desert, CA 92260 Dear Ray: In regard to PP 16-83, Amendment #1: Elynor Falk informs me that I have been quoted as supporting the transfer station as proposed by Palm Desert Disposal Company, and has asked that I write to you to clarify any possible misunderstanding in that regard. I am not aware of Palm Desert Disposal's plans, and I neither support nor oppose the proposed transfer station. I am not opposed to transfer stations per se, if they are properly located, consistent with surrounding land use, and do not cause a nuisance to adjoining property owners. However, I want to make certain that you and the Planning Commission are aware that I have not seen any plans, nor have I given any specific endorsement to any transfer station within the jurisdiction of the City of Palm Desert. Sincerely, 64-e-� PATRICIA A. LARSON cc: Elynor Falk Palm Desert Disposal PAL:rr District Office: 46209 Oasis Strcel,P.O.Drawer 1330,Indio.California 92202.(619)342-8211.(619)345-1072 AVIS RENT CAR SYSTEM, LICENSEE, .NO RENT CAR CORP,., 3400 TAHOUITZ,SUITE 2� dALM SPRINGS.CA 92262(619)327-1353 b • CM LICENSEE May 1, 1987 Palm Desert Planning Commissioner Mr. Rick Erwood City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 Re: PALM DESERT DISPOSAL/TRANSFER STATION Dear Mr. Erwood: When Grand Rent A Car Corporation chose the property on Hovley Lane for purchase it was due in a large degree to the protection received within the Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions of the Corporate Centre at Palm Desert. The proposal by the Palm Desert Disposal to build a Transfer Station to handle additional trash on property is contrary to the following sections of the CCR: "Prohibitive Uses", Section 4.2 (h) , Page 11 "Nuisances", Section 4.3, page 12 As we have invested a substantial amount of money just in the property alone, my disapproval will not only be in the form of this letter but will also be expressed at the Planning Commission meeting May 5, 1987. Res tfully, Dick M. L. Crane District Manager U,ff-C/aa PACIFIC EQUIPMENT & IRRIGATION, INC. May 1, 1987 Rick Erwood City of Palm Desert Planning Commission 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 29960 Dear Mr. Erwood: Over a year ago our Company purchased Lot 21 on the corner of 42nd Avenue and Corporate Way to construct our new branch facility for the distribution of Toro products. This site was selected by us partially because of the tight Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions of the Corporate Center at Palm Desert. This is in view of the high-quality image that our Company and product commands in our effort to service our customers, predominently consisting of the golf course industry. We spent almost a year willingly complying with those C. C. & R. 's, and the tight restrictions imposed upon us by the City of Palm Desert. We are now informed that Palm Desert Disposal is requesting that they be given the right to build a transfer station to handle additional trash on property included in our association. This is contrary to the recorded C. C. & R's; specifically, "Prohibitive Uses" Section 4.2 (H) , Page 11, and "Nuisances" Section 4.3, Page 12. A copy is attache d for your reference. We object strenuously to this request and urge you to help support us in enforcing the C. C. & R's. Further, the planned expansion of Palm Desert Disposal is virtually isolating our facility and surrounding us by a waste disposal container parking lot on one.side and a cement plant on another. We object to the obvious implications of this, i .e. noise, traffic, odor, and drive-by image to name a few. We ask that you consider our situation, investment and need for a location with a favorable image. Toro•Amerind/Mackissic• Beeline• Byho•Chicopee• Cushman• Daihatsu• Dedoes• Echo+F2vette• FMC Bean + Foley+ Gandy H & R Holland • K & D Kurb • Keystone • Lely • Lewis Line King • Mars • McLane • Master + McCulloch + Mitsubishi • Myers Olathe Par-Aide • Peco • PowerTrim +. Ryan Snowco Standard • Stewart • Turfvac +- Vi(:o) • vioods • Vrisimo • tiemcr-i Main Office: 19515 East Walnut Drive N. Industry, California • (818) 912-8533 • (714) 594-5811 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 8000, Industry, California 91748-0800 Branch Office: 74773 Joni Drive • Palm Desert, California 92260 • (619) 340-3392 Page 2 Mr. Erwood Plam Desert City Hall Planning Commission May 1, 1987 I will be present at the planned public hearing scheduled for Tuesday, May 5, 1987 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber at Palm Desert City Hall , to state my concerns regarding this issue. Your support and consideration for our interest in maintaining a high quality industrial park will be greatly appreciated. Sincerely, PACIFIC EQUIPMENT & IRRIGATION, INC. enni D. i Pr sident DDS:pf cc: Jim Richards Bob Downs Carol Whitlock Faith Ladlow JRG ENTERPRISES, INC. OBA TAYLOR ENGINEERING CO. NIOEL MATHIEBON EXECUTIVE VICE PRESICENT April 29 , 1987 Commissioner Raymond Diaz trigy 1 �9�� Planning Commission nct+rFy JY::1'rri:. '... :..W,di Cab i City of Palm Desert "'�' `Jeiiv �F i'n1Y5 PE3E"` 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 RE: Palm Desert Disposal Paln to build transfer station Dear Mr. Diaz : Corporate Center of Palm Desert represents over 1/3 of the industrial complex off of Cook Street. As President and on behalf of the association, I wish to object to the proposed building of a transfer station to handle additional trash on property included in our association. This is contrary to our Association CC & R's that refer to "prohibited uses" section 4 . 2 (H) page 11 and "nuisances" section 4. 3 page 12 . Also as property owner with a building on Lennon Street, directly opposite an entrance used by Palm Desert Disposal trucks, trucks are creating a cover of dust and debris which gets strewn all over the road directly in front of our business office. In addition there is no wall built surrounding the property mentioned. It is my understanding that over 6 months ago the Planning Commisioner Diaz informed Palm Desert Disposal by letter that they were to errect a wall and to date this has not been done. I would also like to point out that the wall adjoining the area in question is not sufficiently high. Trucks behind this wall are clearly visible since in many cases they are 4 to 5 feet above the top of the wall . Your consideration and inforcement on these matters is requested. Members of our association are concerned that depreciation of there property values will occur if Palm Desert Disposal does not comply to building codes Sincerely, Nig 1 Ma��Yr thieson President cc: Rick Erwoods Jim Richards Bob Downs Carol Whitlock Faith Ladlow 68-625 PEREZ RD., NO. 7 • CATHEDRAL CITY, CA. 92234 • (619] 324-94BB BANK of YUCCA,VALLEY •"t^ �: .Th\`�`."�.�r^Si 'i. �'V-K�' � tplin � s ��v * e fix. : �°'"3 T'+ ' .`-i, �+Z•_ �; r�:4L' . . May1. 1, 1987 r•;b� I City of Palm Desert v �. �� m, 4` 73�Si0 Fred waning ,Drive. Palm _Sett, CR 92260 'nii ,�xi ••�' cr9o-.:x..-� " "+C1M •',... RTTN: Rick Exwood� Plannina9.Edmmi ssion Re: ProposedDis osal .Transfer: Station - Dear Mr. Erwood: The Bank of YuccatiVailey,�as lender of: record in major construction projects wrthin�,this�development 1s .very-much -opposed to the disposal station proposition. we have committed and,are currently negotiating,large sums of money in. . "t ? {" this area; based upon the 'CC &�R. s�R and general plan in effect n disposal? transfer: state on would 'be'detrimental to the area and Lo - `` the owners whoihave *nvested,huge amounts of money in good faith in your community. «'v' Very truly yours, s 2' 1�12fAii Keith C. Robbins; M ° . F �7 i 7272 JOSHUA LANE YUCCA VALLEY, CA 92284 (619) 365.6371 . MEMBER FDIC AND THE HI-DESERT COMMUNITIES I + � April 30, 1987 City of Palm Desert Planning Commission 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 Attention: Rick Erwood Planning Commissioner Dear Mr. Erwood, I am very concerned with Palm Desert Disposals plans for a Transfer Station in the Cook Corporate Center on Lennon Place. This is in violation of our recorded CC & R's. The area is being developed into an upgraded Commercial/Industrial area . Tenants and owner users include Decorators, Realtors, The Dialysis Center, Contractors and Designers. I feel the idea of a Rubbish Transfer Station and expanded facilities for Palm Desert Disposal contradicts the ideas and esthetics of our Industrial Park. Expansion in violation of the CC & R (prohibitive uses Section 4.2 (h) would result in needless litigation involving the City and the other involved parties. Lets continue to upgrade.our area. I Regards, Bermuda Partners Kerry A. Meier PALM DESERT 41-501 Corporate Way DIALYSIS Palm Desert, California 92260 CENTER (619) 346-7588 • 346-6252 May 4, 1987 Palm Desert Planning Commission City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, Ca. , 92260 Attention: Mr. Rick Erwood Dear Commissioner: It has been brought to our attention that the Palm Desert Disposal proposes to build a transfer station to handle additional trash on property included in our Association. This is contrary to the recorded CC&R's of this Association. We are naturally concerned for both health and aesthetic reasons about having a disposal transfer station so close to the Palm Desert Dialysis Center. Respectfully submitted, Palm /Desert Dialysis Center �3- �°)'^�� icy ��"• Liz Ramirez, R.N. , Administrator I. April 29 , 1987 Rick Erwood Planning Commission City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert CA 92260 Please be advised that as a property owner in the Corporate Centre Industrial Park, I am opposed to any expansion by Palm Desert Disposal . The existing operation of the disposal company has a detrimental effect on the surrounding property and certainly should not be expanded. Sincerely, Y� /o/ S.Y. Kimball SYK: sdm CC : Jim Richards Bob Downs Carol Whitlock Faith Ladlow 4 MAY 1987 � " TO THE MEMBERS OF THE PALM DESERT PLANNING CODM4ISSION: MAY 5 1987 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT I, ELYNOR FALK, PERSONALLY WENT TO THE GARBAGE BUSINESS ON MONDAY-jY RA`MM41ESERT 1987, AT 5:30 A.M. . THE MEN WERE FIRING UP THEIR EQUIPMENT AND LEAVING FOR COLLECTIONS. I HEARD, I SAW, AND I SMELLED THE POLLUTANTS MENTIONED IN MY PARTNER'S ,LE"PTER, AND I AGREE WITH EVERYTHING THAT MR. MARGULEAS HAS STATED. I ASKED ONE OF THE MEN HOW MANY TRUCKS THEY OPERATED AND HE ESTIMATED ABOUT 80. IT IS HARD FOR ME TO BELIEVE THAT THIS EXPANSION IS FOR ONLY ADDITIONAL STORAGE. AT ANY RATE, THEIR STORAGE YARD APPEARED ADEQUATE TO ME. THERE WAS PLENTY OF ROOM NEXT TO THE OUTHOUSES AND"HONEY WAGONS"TO PARK MORE TRUCKS. SO I WOULD ASK, WHAT EXACTLY DO THEY NOW HAVE IN MIND AND WHAT IS IT THAT THEY ARE PLANNING TO DO IN THE FUTURE THAT THEY NEED 7 ACRES OF LAND? I WAS PUZZLED BY THE VARIOUS PIECES OF EQUIPMENT AND BUILDINGS THAT I OBSERVED AT THE GARBAGE COMPANY'S PLACE OF BUSINESS AND SO NATURALLY THE QUESTION COMES TO MIND, WHAT EXACTLY DO THEY DO, WHAT IS THEIR BUSINESS NOW, AND WHAT IS IT EXPECTED TO BE IN THE FUTURE? MR. HOWARD MARGULEAS, MY PARTNER, WHO HEADS UP AN INTERNATIONAL AGRIBUSINESS COMPANY CALLED SUN WORLD INTERNATIONAL, HAS BEEN PLANNING TO MOVE HIS CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS FROM BAKERSFIELD TO THE VALLEY REGION. IN VIEW OF THE FINE DEVELOPMENTS AROUND 42ND AND CORPORATE WAY, I HAVE BEEN TRYING TO CONVINCE HIM TO LOCATE HIS OFFICES ON OUR 40 ACRES ADJOINING THE CORPORATE CENTER BUSINESS PARK. HUNDREDS OF PEOPLE WOULD HAVE SEEN TRANSFERRED FROM OTHER PLACES TO HEADQUARTER AT THIS LOCATION. THESE HIGH QUALITY PEOPLE AND THEIR FAMILIES WOULD HAVE BEEN AN ASSET TO THE CITY OF PALM DESERT. IT IS A KNOWN FACT THAT PEOPLE WANT TO LOCATE CLOSE TO THEIR PLACE OF EMPLOY- MENT. IF THE PLANNERS OF THIS CITY DON'T EXERT ENOUGH FARSIGHTEDNESS TO REALIZE THAT ENLARGING THIS GARBAGE COMPANY IN THE CENTER OF THE FINEST MEMBERS OF THE 'PLANNING COngISSION 5 MAY 1987 - PAGE TWO BY: ELYNOR FALK DEVELOPMENT IN THE AREA WILL AUTOMATICALLY CANCEL THE BENEFITS THAT COULD HAVE RESULTED, IT WILL BE A TRAGEDY. THERE IS SOMETHING ELSE THAT I WOULD LIKE TO MENTION AND THAT IS THAT I HAVE FOUND OUT THAT MONEY AND SERVICES ARE TRADED BETWEEN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT AND THIS GARBAGE COMPANY. IT APPEARS TO ME THAT THERE CAN BE A CONFLICT OF INTEREST IN THE CITY'S STAFF ENCOURAGING THIS EXPANSION BY RECONAMDING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION. I DON'T FEEL THAT ALL THE FACTS REGARDING AN E.I.R. OR A NEGATIVE DECLARATION CAN BE FAIRLY CONSIDERED BY PEOPLE WHO DO BUSINESS TOGETHER. I ASK THAT TEE MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING CO MISSION REPUDIATE THE STAFF's NEGATIVE DECLARATION RECOMENDATION AND 'REQUIRE A FULL SCALE PROFESSIONAL E.I.R. IF THERE IS THE SLIGHTEST CHANCE THAT THIS EXPANSION REQUEST WILL HAVE FURTHER CONSIDERATION. YOURS TRULY, ELYIPR FALK OWNER OF 40 ACRES I ON 42ND AND CORPORATE MAY � q HOWARD P. MARGULEAS P. o. Box 1028 MAY 5 1987 COACHELLA. CA 92236 619-398-6181 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 4 May 1987 CITY Of PALM DESERT Palm Desert Planning Conmission City of Palm.Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 Attention Commission Members: As a member of Bob Hope Cultural Center Board of Trustees and its Executive Committee, a member of the Eisenhower Medical Center Board of Trustees, a Trember of the Boys Clubs of America National Board, and I will became Chairman of the Board of Directors of the California Chamber of Commerce in September, I would like to express the following. I mention the above affiliations for the sole purpose of clearly identifying that I am a civic minded person interested and deeply concerned with the ongoing welfare and permanent well-being of our desert co mlunity. I will be in New York at the time of your hearing, therefore,. I have asked Art McKay to present my thoughts on the subject of case #PP16-83, amendment #1. I unequivocally state I am not opposed to progress and readily appreciate and realize full well the importance of all the services vital to the well-being of our community. With great civic pride I have watched the development of such high quality properties as the Desert Springs Marriott hotel and the many newly designed attractive buildings in the Corporate Center Park. The possibility of allowing a garbage business to now become the major landmark of this other- wise outstanding development causes great concern and apprehension -- in fact, it is absolutely offensive. The developer of the industrial park and representatives of the City of Palm Desert persuaded my partner, Elynor Falk, and myself to donate to the city (at no renuTeration to us) an additional 20. feet on the 42nd Street frontage, creating an improved alignment for the existing road. This free gift on our part today represents approximately $100,000. TAb agreed to the developer's and the city's request in our desire to be good citizens and because we are conscientious and truly care about the area. We most certainly would not have made the donation if we would have been told that this gift was to facilitate the expansion of a garbage business. If this application goes forward -- we want the gift of our land back! A full scale E.I.R. should be required in any case. This report should include the effect that this garbage expansion proposal would have on each individual's property encompassing the entire area and the further effect it would have on, each individual's business in the existing tract. It should certainly include the effect the expansion would have on property such as ours on 42nd and Corporate Way which is presently zoned for multiple Palm Desert Planning Commission 4 May 1987 -- Page Two housing. . I am sure the health department should be involved in evaluating the air, noise and sanitary conditions. Consideration should be given by the garbage company to moving the existing location of their company to a lesser dense area, one has only to drive by the garbage company and look through the chain link fence as the business exists today. It is certainly not a very pleasant experience to view property on which millions have been spent to beautify, and then, to cane upon the dozens upon dozens of garbage trucks lined up along the chain link fence. Addi- tionally, the hundreds of outhouses located in the garbage company's yard as well as the"honey wagons"that service people who have trouble with their septic tanks are clearly evident. It is my opinion that all of those lumbering awkward garbage trucks would create a safety hazard in the immediate vicinity both coming and going. At the very least they would disturb the aesthetics of the area. Based upon the present zoning that we have on our 40 acre property, it would create a great disturbance to the population of the mobile hone park and would adversely affect our property values. I strongly urge you to dec this expansio pe=ut. Yours truly $o and Marguleas HPM/kh tr � • MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION APRIL 21 , 1987 Moved by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner Downs, adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 1218, approving PM 22499 subject to conditions as amended. Carried 5-0. IX. MISCELLANEOUS A. Case No. PP' 6 83 Amendment PALM DESERT DISPOSAL, Applicant Request for clarification of use for the Palm Desert Disposal transfer station located on the south side of Lennon Place, between Eclectic and Corporate Way. Mr. Diaz explained that the applicant would be before the commission on May 5 under public hearing, but wished for clarification on the permitting of a transfer.station. Mr. Raymond Burke of Palm Desert Disposal reviewed the request and felt there was a definite need for this facility. Mr . Diaz suggested a one-day tour of the Anaheim facility. Commissioner Richards requested additional written information in lieu of a tour. Mr. George Berkey, Boardmember of Corporate Center Property Owners Association, felt there was a need for this type of facility, but requested an alternate site. Commissioner Richards stated that he would like to hear a detailed report at a public hearing and Commissioner Downs stated that he would like to see the transfer station use proposed under a conditional use permit at any location. Mr. Diaz recommended that Mr. Burke talk to adjacent property owners prior to the May 5 public hearing. Action: Commission determined that more information was needed and felt that a conditional use permit might be appropriate. X. COMMENTS None. 10 r 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NOTICE OF ACTION Date: May 6, 1987 Howard Parcell Palm Desert Disposal 481'5 Main Street 41575 Eclectic Street Yorba Linda, CA 92686 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Re: QLI6L83 AMENDMENT $�1 The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of May 5, 1987. CONTINUED TO JUNE 2, 1987. CARRIED 5-0. Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Community Development, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen ( 15) days of the date �ooff the decision. RAMON A. DIAZ, SECRET PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION RAD/tm O. When recorded return to: Op Cook Hovley Stree Associates w a " f C cn 9_' 73-6-I El Paseo � Y co x�� Palm ._ sert, CA 92260 o �2 co ° SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR � g \ 00 RECORDER' S USE W a N C�2 W AMENDMENT TO DECLARATION OF COVENANTS , CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS OF CORPORATE CENTRE AT PALM DESERT THIS AMENDMENT is made this 19th day of February, 1986 by COOK HOVLEY STREET ASSOCIATES, A Minnesota General Partnership and COOK CORPORATE CENTER, A California General Partnership, as Imo, owners of more than seventy-five percent (75%) of the total square feet of real estate described in the Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions dated July 22 , 1985 and recorded in the offices of the County Recorder of Riverside County on July 23 , 1985 at document number 166213 , and previously recorded as document number 161610 , hereinafter called the "CC '& R' s" . W I T N E S S E T H: WHEREAS, in order to correct an error in the legal description attached to the CC & R' s as Exhibit "A" , it is necessary to amend the CC & R' s to eliminate Parcel 17 of Parcel Map 17452 from the burden of the CC & R' s ; and . WHEREAS, the undersigned, as owners of more than seventy-five ( 75% ) of the total square footage of the real estate covered by the CC & R' s , may pursuant to Section 5 . 2 of the CC & R' s amend the same, which amendment is hereby approved by Declarant COOK HOVLEY STREET ASSOCIATES, A Minnesota General Partnership. NOW THEREFORE, Declarant and the undersigned hereby . 00 make the following amendment to the CC & R' s : co Cd C7 1 . In order to correct the legal description attached to the CC & R' s as Exhibit "A" , the following legal description is substituted therefore in place of the legal description set forth on Exhibit "A" to the CC & R' s to wit: Parcels 1 through 16 and Parcels 18 through 33 inclusive, together with Lot "F" of Parcel Map 17452 as shown by Parcel Map on file in Book 130, Pages 14 through 17 inclusive of Parcel Maps , records of riverside County. eliminate he effect of the amendment .set forth above is to ot 17 from the legal description set forth on to the said CC & R' s. — 2 . In all other respects the said CC .& R' s shall remain the same and no further amendment is intended nor shall same be inferred from this document other than the elimination of Parcel 17 from the burden of the CC & R' s. THIS AMENDMENT is made and entered into by Declarant and the undersigned as of the day and year first above written. COOK HOVLEY STREET ASSOCIATES, A Minnesota General Partnership By C GEORGE P. BERK Y, Managing Pa er COOK CORPORATE CENTER, A California General. partne)rship By - \ �_- ROBERT RISHWAIN, Managing Partner STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) n ) SS R:v COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) On February 19 , 1986 , before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared GEORGE P. BERKEY, known to me to be the Managing Partner of the partnership that executed the within instrument, and acknowledge to me that such partnership executed the same. Witness my hand and official seal. OFFICIAL SEAL SUSAN CHESTER �^ Notwy Public-California LOS ANGELES COUNTY T— c My Comm.Exp.Jan.28,19M STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) (' ) SS COUNTY OF c On February ;lp 1986 , before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared ROBERT RISHWAIN, personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the Managing Partner of the partnership that executed the within instrument, and acknowledge to me that such partnership executed the same. Witness my hand and official seal OFFICIAL SEAL . ,�y+J� CAROLYN QUIJALt 0 �-t'. T NOTARYPUBLIC-CALIFORNIA �a; . SANJOAQUINCOUNTY MYCOLIWSSIDU EYYIRE5 xT N.1935 vti ROBERT S. RITCHEY AIA d ® ARCHITECTURE • PLANNING INTERIORDESIGN May 6, 1987 Mr . George Berkey) Jr . 41-555 Cook Street : Suite 200 Palm Deserts CA 92260 Regarding Palm Desert Disposal Expansion Project Dear George : Pursuant to our phone conversation today, this letter is intended to clarify ❑ur action regarding the above mentioned project . About a week ago I reviewed the expansion project for the Corporate Center . It should be noted that most ❑f the POD expansion is not within the boundary of the Corporate Center review area . There is only one lot in question and the frontage ❑n Lennon Street which faces the Corporate Center properties . We reviewed the project with that scope in mind and never intended for any of our comments ❑r approvals t❑ include the project as a whole . You are correct in stating that you had never seen the project before . The PDD representative did not have sufficient copies of the plans at the time ❑f rev.:iew to distribute to the City Building Department as well as leave copies with me for my files and to distribute to your office . They did agree to return ASAP additional copies for our files . These have not been received as of yet . With regard to the content - of our review, the following was noted . 1 . The scope of the review only included the landscaping and wall design on the Lennon Street frontage and the entry on to Lennon . 45-120 San Pablo Suite 2D • Palm Desert,California 92260 • (619)340-2496 2 . It was noted to the Agent that the one Corporate Center lot was zoned S—I zone and that it was our interpretation that zone did not allow for disposal yards , and in addit=ion - that the Corporate Center CC&Rs did not allow for a dump either . It was noted to the POD Agent that the Corporate Center was not approving the use, that we were only making comments regarding the landscaping) street entrance & wall design . It was felt that the City Planning Dept . would make a decision with regard to the use since the majority of the property was not located within the Corporate Center boundaries . In talking with Phil Joy of the City Planning Dept . he concurred that our review did not give a blanket approval of the project and was only concerned with the items previously mentioned . He stated that in his staff report . Mr . Joy also stated that he was not in favor of having the entry onto Lennon Street . I agreed with that opinion . 3. Other comments were made with regard to the entry off of Lennon Street . It was felt that an additional screen wall was necessary to effectively screen the Corporate Center properties from seeing the dump site behind . They agreed to do this . Our review was completed while the POD agent was present and he took the plans as noted and stamped to the City for submission for approval . He agreed to return ASAP with our copies . I hope this clarifies our review of the project . As soon as I get copies back from the PDD agent I will forward on to you for your review and comment . ncere y Y rs , Robert S. itchey) AIA Corporate Center Architect cc : Phil Joy) Planning Dept .✓ City of Palm Desert HOWARD PARSELL COMPANY architecture structural engineering civil engineering 4815 MAIN STREET YORBA LINDA,CALIFORNIA 92686 714-777-3765 April 20, 1987 City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, California 92260 Attn: Ray Diaz Planning Director Re: Palm Desert Disposal Dear Sir: As a result of the Design Review meeting of last week, we are assuming that we were given conceptual approval of our proposal (which consists of site improvements, building addition, landscaping and perimeter screen wall). Will you please provide me with information regarding: 1. Are we required to go before the Planning Commission, and if so, when? 2. Do we need to return to a Design Review meeting? For your information, we will be filing for plan check and permit for a portion of the perimeter screen wall this week. We will also be submitting preliminary landscaping drawings for your review. YAward ly, H Parsell HP/ls 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 May 4, 1987 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION ACTION CASE NO: PP 16-83 Amendment #1 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) : PALM DESERT DISPOSAL, 41575 Eclectic Street, Palm Desert, CA 92260; HOWARD PARCELL, 4815 Main Street, Yorba Linda, CA 92686. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of expansion to parking and storage area and a second story addition. LOCATION: South side of Lennon Place between Eclectic and Corporate Way. ZONE: S. I . ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Upon reviewing the submitted plans and presentations by staff and by the applicant, the architectural commission granted preliminary approval subject to conditions. Date of Action: April 28, 1987 Vote: Carried 4-0 I (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen ( 15) days of the date of the decision. ) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ STAFF COMMENTS: Please read the attached minutes. 1 MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION APRIL 28, 1987 B. Preliminary Plans: 1. CASE NO: PP 16-83 Amendment #1 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) . PALM DESERT DISPOSAL, 41575 Eclectic Street, Palm Desert, CA 92260; HOWARD PARCELL, 4815 Main Street, Yorba Linda, CA 92686. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of expansion to parking and storage area and a second story addition. LOCATION: South side of Lennon Place between Eclectic and Corporate Way. ZONE: S. I . Mr. Joy recommended that a screening wall and landscaping be placed at the Lennon Place entrance if planning commission is to grant approval of said entrance. He indicated that he had questions with the use of the driveway and also the width of 50 feet. Chairman Gregory asked what provisions had been made for solar protection. The applicant explained that they were to have solar treated windows, blinds and a small eve trim. He questioned the maximum height of the roof mounted equipment. Commissioner Holden explained that the equipment has to be screened and kept below the 30 foot maximum height. Chairman Gregory suggested that additional planting areas be provided around the building to give a softening effect. He recommended that the screening area to be provided at the Lennon Place entrance be made broader and landscaping be provided on both sides of the wall . He suggested that taller trees be planted at the rear of the wall and lower planting at the front of the wall . The applicant agreed to address the suggestions of further landscaping around the building and at the screen wall area. It was moved by Commissioner Holden, seconded by Commissioner McCrea to grant preliminary approval with the above discussion to be addressed at final submittal . Carried 4-0 3 u . Z r� IV. REGULATING OPERATIONS AND USES CD. Q (.0 4. 1 PERMITTED USES rN W No operation or use of property within Corporate Centre P � shall be. permitted until the plans and specifications therefor have been submitted and approved in writing by Declarant pur- suant to the procedures in Article III . Unless otherwise specifically prohibited herein, any in- dustrial or commercial operation and use will be permitted if it is performed or carried out entirely within a building that is designed and constructed so that said enclosed operations and uses do not cause or produce a nuisance to adjacent sites, such as but not limited to, unreasonable vibration, sound, electro- mechanical disturbances, radiation, air or water pollution, dust, or emission of odors, toxic or non-toxic matter. All lighting is to be reasonably shielded from adjacent sites. De- clarant may restrict, control, or prohibit any use or uses of any site subject to this Declaration, which Declarant in its sole discretion deems to create a nuisance to adjacent sites or which Declarant deems offensive or detrimental to any other property subject to this Declaration. 4 . 2 PROHIBITED USES The following operations and uses shall not be permitted on any property subject to these restrictions : (a) Residential; (b) Trailer courts; (c) Labor camps; (d) Junk yards; (e) Drilling for and/or the removal of oil , gas or other hydrocarbon substances; (f) Commercial excavation of building or construction materials; (g) Distillation of bones; r (h) Dumping, disposal, incineration or reduction of garbage, sewage, dead animals, or refuse; i - (i) Fat rendering; N (j ) Stockyard or slaughter of animals; O (k) Smelting of iron, tin, zinc or other ores ; CCD (1) Cemeteries; rq M (m) Jail or honor farms. 4. 3 NUISANCES No rubbish or debris of any kind shall be permitted to accumulate upon or adjacent to any site other than normal ac- cumulation and storage of trash in connection with a confined and reasonably prompt trash disposal or pick up program, and no odors shall be permitted to arise therefrom so as to render any site or portion thereof unsanitary, unsightly, offensive or detrimental to any of the property in the vicinity thereof or to the occupants thereof. No nuisance shall be permitted to exist or operate upon any site so as to be offensive or detrimental to any property in the vicinity thereof or to its occupants. 4. 4 MAINTENANCE AND REPAIRS Each site and all improvements thereon shall at all times be constructed, kept and maintained in first-class condition, repair and appearance. All repairs, alterations, replacements or additions to improvements shall be at least equal to the original work in class and quality. Each owner shall also be responsible at all times for de- termining that all improvements and the plans and specifications therefor shall conform and comply in all respects with these re- strictions, all other restrictions of record, all applicable governmental regulations , and all exterior architectural design, location and color specifications as may be approved by Declarant. Each owner shall also adopt and maintain such standards of prop- erty space maintenance, appearance and housekeeping as shall be reasonable and customary for similar operations or enterprises and. shall enforce compliance with such standards by all tenants, occupants, or users of space. -12- RIVERSIDE COUNTY �'�E of CALF°o�� e v^' Gzl FIRE DEPARTMENT `- IN COOPERATION WITH THE , COUNTY «, ` CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY e„ - Rlveesio �A':: ; RAY HEBRARD l�EMT OF `Op�S FIRE CHIEF 210 WESTSAN JACINTO AVENUE PERRIS, 92370 APk�L7,19 ��� �' EtYEItHONEIFORNIA -3183 Ramon Diaz Planning and Community APR 8 1987 Development Director 73510 Fred Waring COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Palm Desert, CA 92260 CITY OF PALM.DESERT Reference:PP I6—%) AMEaO•il ( Applicant: P.V. A SAL Dear Mr. Ramon Diaz The following fire protection requirements are in accordance with the Uniform Fire Code and Life Safety Code standards. 1 . Install a water system capable of delivering)V GPM fire flow from any fire hydrant far a �d hour.duration in addition t domestic supply. The computation shall be based pon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement. 2. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants so that no point of any building .is more than /o— feet from a fire hydrant measured along approved vehicular travel ways. a. exterior surface of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow, and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. b. curbs shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. c. hydrants shall not be located closer than 0.- feet to any. building. 3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and three copies of the water system plan to the Fire Marshal for review. Upon approval , one copy will be sent to the Building Department and the original will be returned to the developer. 4. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and approved by the water company wi h the following certification: "Itcertify that the design of the water system in is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Fire Marshal ." 5. Prior to delivery of combustible materials to the building site, the required water system shall be installed, operating and delivering the required flow. 6. Additional fire protection requirements may be necessary when the applicant submits specific plans for consideration and approval . 7. All buildings overSM square feet require an approved fire sprinkler system. Very truly yours, RAY HEBRARD ,,FF�ime Chief By,114.lM,L C.—X MIKE MCCONNELL Fire Marshal HOWARD PARSELL COMPANY / architecture structural engineering civil engineering 4815 MAIN STREET YORBA LINDA,CALIFORNIA 92686 714-777-3765 J„ �, ;I' S0 => 20 IMP February 20, 1987 t LGf i:F hl` uer'Kd iP: CC1".:"V't'ILYit C� P,i t! iiFS�vi City of Palm Desert ' I 1 73-510 Fred Waring Drive 1dQ, f r- �I•`^ Palm Desert, California, 92260 njw � So�l� Attn: Mr. Ray Diaz " Ae , Planning Department Re: Palm Desert Disposal 41-575 Eclectic Street Dear Sir: As you are aware, Palm Desert Disposal has acquired additional properties adjacent to their existing facility. We are currently planning expansion on these properties. Specifically, we are planning the following : 1 . Construction of a perimeter decorative masonry wall to screen the site from the adjacent streets. The wall will match the existing wall currently surrounding the site. 2. Grading and paving of the new areas to allow employee parking, storage of containers and other items , and possibly the construction of a small transfer stateion. 3• A second floor addition to the existing one story office building. We are currently planning to submit the required development package, including The Precise Plan, The Environmental Assessment Form, The Architectural Review data, and the associated drawings and adjacent property owner information. We were told lay rhP planning staff that if we submit wirhli the naxr week or so that we will be scheduled for the first meeting in April . A7 (continued) HOWARD PARSELL COMPANY architecture structural engineering civil engineering 4815 MAIN STREET YORBA LINDA,CALIFORNIA 92686 714-777-3765 We understand that the proposed transfer station will be of primary concern to your department. We also understand it is imperative that the decorative screen wall be constructed as soon as possible. Consequently, we are proposing the following sequence of events : 1 . Submittal of plans for the screen wall with the goal of obtaining construction permits as soon as possible. It was explained to us that the complete development package (Precise plan , etc.) will not be required for the wall work only. We have included a preliminary site plan showing the wall for your review. If you see no major problems, we will submit detailed 'drawings and engineering calculations for the wall shortly. 2. Submittal of the complete development package the week of February 23• This will include the building addition and the site improvements on the newly acquired properties. Regarding the transfer station , we are concerned about indicating this on our master plan, because we do not want it to delay your review of the office expansion. We request your comments and opinions on this matter, and we also need your comments on our approach outlined above. Please call this office at your convenience. Yours T� Howard Parsell 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NQ.(S) P. /(o-83 AnA� v�.#/ v/ sus L-CIEe7-16 i _ _. �iSPoSALPROJECT: z5�zT APPLICANT:. Lk'C Con Ti cT) y/ 575 ECZecTic 57 y8/5 MA/.✓ 5T. (714) 777 37&5 n-/I1-4 DESE7z7- <'.4 q_2 260 YO1013A LiNDq n4 92Gc56 Enclosed please find materials describing a project for which the following Is being requested_4PPkod4L OF A S�✓E✓. Acrr� Exi�a ✓SiGn/ 70 aAnfiti� q 11D S7-O7746,F AREa AND 9 S£!�✓� STo?y �Dv/Tia✓ To ten[ �XiST in/G 57�✓c7U���SS�0 SQ, �T) rO;P /I TTrASN f/n✓Li✓G q ✓j 7>iS�o,<4 PI/vy ✓/77/ 4 47 Z>tc[.41?4Ti�✓ a� �.✓✓rno r hcv�[ 147>4C7- 15)l47-;e7? cam/ T,5- SO✓771 SDE oV= L,�d✓C),r/ d�GaC� (�aY-� 90 - U/gTyz� oao� 0.57do5 [ rE✓r. Zy,res A.O. LI-ILI The attached data was prepared by the applicant and is being forwarded to you for comments and recommended conditions of approval . The city 1s interested in the probable impacts. on the environment ( including land, air, water, minerals, flora, fauna, noise, objects of historical or aesthetic significance) and recommended conditions of approval based on your expertise and area of concern. � Tze�'aun/ Ar/�✓ io !'�.-�iL _ off, Your comments and recommended conditi0 of approval must be received by this office prior to 4:30 p.m. L/-4.�7 , in order to be discussed by the land division committee. The land division committee (comprised of director of community development, city building official , city engineer, fire marshal , and a representative of CVWD) will discuss the comments and recommended conditions of approval and will forward them to the planning commission through the staff report. Any information received by this office after the receipt deadline will not be discussed by the land division committee. Sincerely, ---------------------------------------- RAMON A. DIAZ DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT/PLANNING /tm Attachments PLEASE RETURN' MAP WITH COMMENTS J RG ENTERPRISES, INC. OBA TAYLOR ENGINEERING CO. NIGEL MATHIESCN EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT April 29 , 1987 Commissioner Jim Richards Planning Commission City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 RE: Palm Desert Disposal Plan to build transfer station Dear Mr. Richards : Corporate Center of Palm .Desert represents over 1/3 of the industrial complex off of Cook Street. As President and on behlaf of the association, I wish to object to the proposed building of a transfer station to handle additional trash on property included in our association. This is contrary to our Association CC & R' s that refer to "prohibited uses" section 4 . 2 (H) page 11 and "nuisances" section 4 . 3 page 12 . Also as property owner with a building on Lennon Street, directly opposite an entrance used by Palm Desert Disposal trucks , trucks are creating a cover of dust and debris which gets strewn all over the . road directly in front of our business office. In addition there is no wall built surrounding the property mentioned. It is my understanding that over 6 months ago the Palnning, Commisioner Diaz informed Palm Desert Disposal by letter that they were to errect a wall and to date this has not been done. I would also like to point out that the wall • adjoining the area in question is not sufficiently high. Trucks behind this wall are clearly visible since in many cases they are 4 to 5 feet above the top of the wall. ' Your consideration and inforcement on these matters is requested. Members of our association are concerned that depreciation of there property values will occur if Palm Desert Disposal does not comply to building codes . Sincerely, Nigel Mathieson President Ea-U--25 PEREZ EEO., N®. 7 0 CATHEDRAL CITY, CA. 92234 0 (S191 3?4-9-asG INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES / �� �Nl_� aIiL �dy FROM: DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS Vl-& SUBJECT: FzE�ls� Pr-�� 16-83 I � ntD1 ,NT APR 81987 DATE: ~���'. � � i �87 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF PALM DESERT The following should be considered conditions of approval : 1 ) Drainage and signalization fund fees , as required by City ordinance , shall be paid prior to ( recordation of the final map) (grading permit issuance) . 2 ) Drainage facilities shall be provided, per Ordinance No . 218 and the Master Drainage Plan , to the specifications of the Director of Public Works . 3) Storm drain construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study by the private engineer that is approved by the Department of Public Works . 4) Full public improvements , including traffic safety lighting, as required by ordinance and the Director of Public Works , shall be installed in accordance with City standards . 5) Improvement plans for water and sewer systems shall be approved by the respective service districts with "as-built" plans submitted to the Department of Public Works prior to the project final . Complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the Director of Public Works for checking and approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. The engineer shall submit "as-built" plans prior to the acceptance of the improvements by the City. 0 All private (444a a" H driveways and parking lots ) shall be inspected by the engineering department and a standard Inspection fee shall be paid prior to a" a ! ap ) (grading permit issuance) . Landscaping maintenance on Lp.nrtiq �II�P ��-,�.�rardWZ. shall be provided by the (property/ owner) . . 9) Existing utilities on shall be undergrounded per each respective utility dis- trict' s recommendation . If determined to be unfeasible applicant shall agree to participate in any future utility undergrounding district . 1. l , 10j Traffic safety striping on th ctor of shall be .provided to the spec ( fica1annmusf bee submitted to Public Works . A traffic control P lacing and approved by the Director of Public Works be ore pavement markings - 11 Complete grading plans and speCtoitheion DirectorlofePubblmct- ted, as required by ordinance , Works for checking and approval prior to issuance of any permits . 12) Dedication of feet of right-prior toay n shall be done issuance of any permits and approval of plans . 13) Installation of curb and gutter , matching paving and sidewalk on except at approved 14) Waiver of access to P. locations shall be granted on the final ma utter . 15) Close unused driveway with full height curb and 9 Offsite improvement plans to be approved by Public Works Posted to guarantee the required Department and a surety P � offsite improvements prior to issuance) . � (grading permit based on en- 17) full improvement Of streets standards as0established in a (Private) n accordance with Chapter 26 , Section 26 . 40 .040 , C .P . Code . or cash payment for one-half the 1g) Installation of one-half landscaped median n the option of the Director of cost of landscaped median at Public Works . 19) Traffic analysis to be prepared for the project to address g networks (street the specific impacts o nP x posed mitigationmeasuresndrecom- intersections) the City . mended for approval by 20) Installation of sewers to serve this project . ork Size, number and location Y f D rive;a s t oaPublichWe)sto be 21 specifications with only — allowed to serve this property . .ar (Original conditions apply 1G_83. Fi3J1 �a1vrno.^ Ft('¢ciSa (2lsrrrnr �m++rvriss�ov, Y 23) Grading permit issuanceappaovedeandbrecordedthe waiver of parcel map first being i r s 244 Complete (panel ) (tract) map ( s) shall b_ submitted as required by ordinance to the Director of Public Works for checking and approval and be recorded before issuance of any permits . 0Anyand all off-site improvements shall be preceded by the 0 approval of plans and the issuance of valid encroachment permit ( s) by the Department of Public Works . 26) A complete preliminary soils investigation , conducted by a registered soils engineer , shall be submitted to and approv- ed by the Department of Public Works prior to issuance of the grading permit . 27 Applicant shall secure reciprocal ingress and egress access easements from the owner(.s4 ofA4_� 1F311EJI20d i a," 2 28) 29) Richard J . Folkers , P .E . RA/RJF Rev . 7/25/86 ( i TO REMOVE rvc zvee �� AREON9 ® � � QCAS. 01 SET ADORE$$INOW � C ;M� 37-821 (4722) 2,PART LABELS , IOAA i10111tA HOLD[YOS(IIYIY IIIXO tOilIR1 31A1 APART 1 15. 33. ,Grand Rent A Car Corp. Thomas E. Kyser Prince Loadsman Joint Venture i 555 S. Flower St., Ste 4140 P.O. Box K 1030 W. Manchester Blvd. j Los Angeles, California 90071 :Palm Desert, California 92261 Inglewood, california 90301 2,9,16,17,20,21,22,23,26. 18: 34. Falk, Dave et al, Falk, Saynor et Cook Hovley Street Assoc. Pacific Equip. & Irrigation Leasing Howard P. Marguleas, et al 73640 El Paseo ;c/o DSJ & S Co. Ardith B. Marguleas et al Palm Desert, California 92260 ;6171 Wimbledon c/o AG Accting Inc., P.O. Box 9110 Riverside, California 92506 Bakersfield, California 93389 ! 3,4. :19. I U.S. Postal Service ;Corporate Way Industrial 850 Cherry Avenue Building Partnership San Bruno, California 94066 P.O. Box 258 Palm Desert, California 92261 i 5,6. 24. Cook Hovley Street Assoc. Gregory, Ronald & Gregory, Marcy 73861 Rutledge 76540 Sweetpea Way Palm Desert, California 92260 Palm Desert, California 92260 7 - -- 25. Len Non Co. Bernard Soloman 47 Signal Hills No. A 74133 Highway 111 West St. Paul, MN 55118 Palm Desert, California 92260 8. 27. Cook Hovley Street Assoc. Mahoney, Thomas Patrick TR c/o CAM Const. - Mahoney, Rhoda Jean TR . 33255 Date Palm Dr. . 5 Collins Isle Cathedral City, California 92234 Balboa Island, California 92662 10. 28. Hovley Group Donald K. Oster 563 Sierra Way ! P.O. Box 2853 Palm Springs, California 92264 ' Palm Desert, California 92261 11 . 29. Hovley Group : Krinnit, Ben & Krinnit, Sally 68713 Perez Rd., Unit 1 11479 Blue Jay Way Perris, California 92234 Los Angeles, California 90699 12. 30. Palmer Broadcasting Co. Avriette, Gene & Margaret Y. P.O. Box 368 69941 Papaya Lane Palm Desert, California 92260 Cathedral City, California 92234 13. Palm Desert Mini Warehouse 31. Daniel M. & Gloria K. Kelly DBA Mini Storage of Palm Desert Daniel R. & Kathleen A. Williams c/o Marshall L. Morgan 48900 Paisano Drive 4020 Birch St., Ste 103 Palm Desert, California 92260 Newport Beach, California 92660 14. 32. Armored -Transport Inc. Groeschel, Charges & Robyn 1612 W. Pico Blvd. Caine, Brian Los Angeles, California 90015 P.O. Box 789 Palm Springs, California 92263 -J CASE N0. Environmental Assessment Form TO THE APPLICANT: Your cooperation in completing this form and supplying the information requested will expedite City review of your application pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. The City is required to make an environmental assessment on all projects which it exercises discretionary °approval over. Applications submitted will not be considered complete until all information necessary to make the environmental assessment is complete. r / M it d GENERAL INFORMATION: 1 . Name, address , and�tele hone number of owner, applicant or project sponsor: XA� Palm Desert Disposal 41- 75 Eclectic Street Palm Desert 2. Name, address and telephone number of person to be contacted con- cerning the project (such as architect, engineer, or other repre- sentative) : Howard Parsell 4815 Main Street Yorba Linda CA 92686 (714) 777-3765 3. Common name of project (if any) : Palm Desert Disposal 4. Project location (street address or general location) : 41-575 Eclectic 5. Precise legal description of property (lot and tract number, or-., meets & bounds) : — Parcels '1,2 & 3 Parcel Map 18831• Parcels 1 & 2 Parcel Map 20112• Parcels 18 19 & 20 Parcel Map 17452 6. Proposed use of the site (project for which the form is filed; describe the total undertaking, not just the current application approval being sought) : offices , shops , parking and site storage for operation of trash hauling and disposal company. 7. Relationship to a larger project or series of projects (describe how this project relates to other activities , phases , and develop- ments planned, or now underway) :. This project is an expansion of existing facilities. 8. List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, to go for;rard, including those required by the City, Regional , State and Federal agencies (indicate sub- sequent approval agency name, and type of approval required) : Building and grading permits E;QSTIilG'COIDITIONS : 9. Project site area: 10.26 A C 10. Present zoning: (Size or property in sq. ft, or acreage) S. I . (Proposed zoning) : S.I. 11 . General Plan land use designation: 12. Existing use of the project site: Offices&_rnaintenanceaho's arkin & storage 13. Existing use on adjacent properties : (Example - North, Sho South, Single Family Dwellings ; East, Vacant, etc. ) , ppin9 Center; East - Mini-storage; North - light industrial; West - Vacant; South - Vacant and light industrial. 14. Site topography (describe) : Site is generally flat , sloping slightly to the soutl4east. = 15. Are there any natural or manmade drainage channels through or adjacent to the property? N-0 xx YES 16. Grading (estimate number of cubic yards of dirt being moved) : Less than 1000 .CY 17. List the number, size and type of trees being removed: None 18. Describe any cultural , historic, or scenic aspects of the project site: - 19. Residential Project (if not residenti 1 do NOT answer) A. Number and type of dwelling unit (Specify no. of bedrooms) : B. Schedule of unit sizes : C. Number of stories Height feet. D. Largest single building (sq. ft. ) (hgt. ) E. Type of household size expected ( opulation projection for the project) : F. Describe the number and type of r creational facilities : G. Is there any night lighting of th project: H. Range of sales prices or rents : $ to $ I . Percent of total project devoted o: Building . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . « Paving, including streets. . . . . . . « Landscaping, Open, Recreation Are . . . . . . o 20. Commercial , Industrial , Institutional or Other Project: A. Type of use(s) and major function(s) ( if offices , specify type & number) : Offices --vPhi�la'�PrdirP-t3ays� maintan ,nrP shnn B. Number of square feet in total building area : 172500 SF C. Number of stories 2 Height 33 feet. D. Largest single building (Sq. Ft. ) 10,200 (Hgt. ) 33ft. E. Number of square feet in outdoor storage area : 240,000 SF F. Total number of required parking spaces 56 number provided 159 G. Hours of operation: 6AM - IOPM H. Maximum number of clients, patrons , shoppers , etc. , at one time: N.A. I. Maximum number of employees at one time: So J. If patron seating is involved, state the number: N.A. K. Is there any night lighting of the project: Yes xx No L. Percent of total project devoted to: Building . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 w .7 Paving, including streets. . . . . . . . . . 95.8 Landscaping and Open Space (Recreation) . 1.5 Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects : Discuss below all items checked yes (attach additional sheets as necessary) . YES NO 21 . Change in existing features of hillsides , ✓ or substantial alteration of ground contours. 22. Change in the dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in the project vicinity. ^✓ 23. Subject to or resulting in soil errosion by wind ✓ or flooding. 24. Change in ground water quality or quantity, or alteration of existing drainage patterns. 25 Change in existing noise or vibration level in the vicinity. Subject to roadway or airport noise (has the required acoustical report been submitted?) ✓. 26. Involves the use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives. 27. Involves the use of substantial amounts of ✓ fuel or energy. 28. Changes the demand for municipal services (police, fire, sewage, etc. ) 29. Changes the demand for utility services , beyond those presently available or planned in the near future. ✓ 30. Significantly affects any unique or natural ✓ features, including mature trees. 31 . Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or public land or public roads. 32. Results in the dislocation of people. ✓ r YES NO 33. Generates controversy based on aesthetics or other features of the project. XX [ ] Additional explanation of "yes" answers attached. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation, to the best of my ability, and that the facts , statements and information presented are true and correct to the best of my,knowledge and belief. Howard Parsell Palm Desert Disposal Name Print or Type For Signature Date INITIAL STUDY FEE: $30. 00 (Make check payable to the City of Palm Desert and sub— mit with this form. ) _ t • r� r�r I 73-510 Fred Waring Dr., Palm Desert, Ca. 92`260 PRECISE PLAN 'uT)L2C A7U(0H FSRH : Dept.of Planning and Community Development Howard Parsell (for Palm Desert Disposal ) Applicant (ptease print) 4815 Hain Street (7 777-3765 Teleononone Mailing Address _ Yorba Linda, CA 92636 City State Zip-Code REQUEST: (Descrtte specific nature of approval requested I. Addition (2nd story) to office building expansion of parking facilities construction of perimeter decorative masonry wall , grading and paving of yard area for parking and storage, ,_ PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Parcels 1 2 & 3 Parcel clap 18831• Parcels 1 & 2 Parcel Map 20112; Parcels 18,19 & 20 Parcel P,lap 17452 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 624-290-38, 624-290-41 , 624-290-40, 624-290-18, 624-290-19 624,290-20 EXISTING ZONING jamign Property Owner Authorizarea that they are the owner(s) at the property described herein and hereby give aurhor- g at this application. x 3 5i natureAgreement abscivmq me 'coilittes relative to any deed restrictions. I DO BY MY SIGNENT, Absolve the City of Palm Desert of all Ilabilittes regarding any deed restrictions Mat may be applicable to the property described herein. x %Y /8'7 iq azure Cate l Applicants Signature Signature Date (FOR STAFF USE ONLY) Environmental Status. Accepted by: ❑ Ministerial Act E.A.No. ❑ Categorical Exemption CAM. RDS ❑ Negative DeGaration ❑ Other Reference Case No. EW'Roft."r Sam,=/Are a-7-62 .] ..:e: r ' f � e GEf1EAAL4 NA AWiO Ott I F I tAT IONS CONCRETE: 2000 psi minimum strength at 28 days. WITl Z�IO.G.EA.W4`r . Control joints in slabs shall be as shown or as directed by the Engineer. ;. REINFORCING STEEL: ASTM A615 Grade 40 unless otherwise indicated. Provide 40 bar N�ry A I�A� A�' � T� 2/Z O��t� -�} �A�... M diameter laps at all splices. I _ I -" ~• � r` p P F�r�Gl= t'o �E. �AfJ �1 t�/' (✓�;1�I t�1`� , %ZiI �O�T"� t�L> —' 15 p�AI A��. FOOTINGS Shali rest on firm, undisturbed natural soil or approved compacted fill j 1�d VID;5- D d� Q ! i��.�s✓��-ate X e(j ►� at a minimum depth indicated on the drawings. Design soil pressure ,� 200 o P f ^i!�I D tr o.d.D t ' Ci r` .. C PRE-ENGINEERED STEEL BUILDiNGS: Shall be rigid frame type and shall conform with I00 -J .�`. provisions of Uniform Building Code. Complete structural calculations and ��+� I U � cc _ shop drawings shall be provided to the engineer for approval . I fz O MASONRY: Bloc.k units shall conform with ASTM C-90. Design is based on f'm 1500 psi . ( 3 W ­_7 CL 12-1 co rr aa_ tp- ; -- owner---- ow •C•� - i I I 4 - - - -- 15 , I , I I + C AL i l A ( I .r - I I I , �, ,„ .. i I I I I I 1 I I � , - -- - - l - �, I - 1`} � '$ i :�,•. 4- � � - � 1 I I I 1 1 I 1 + t 1 � � ( 1 I I I ?e� " ° ���:; F •�. ,_ :'�`' - '`9 � � cc PA L Ail TT t � F UJ rah dal 1, w kvq �g"r„d ,.� „� � '%=',-c"� �=: �;.' . .. ,at e.ses cUvn..r ",L i..ir. , ��.. G.iW� G 1l ] 1 G uG, ( I r�V f'v•�� # g :F,. ` :' �`'% :.r °r; x� /``'^. '"'r' "pz"' ..' �5 ,.ffi ;" � .a }�c't`t,r � N .,. .� ,MnwnarrY}� ti e..re fliQ- i OE\!P, �P 7,. YM f- r ✓ _ �E 1 $,: z`Y I _ fir, , I v , •sP s� iyq (,�OU _ -f X JR - d 4 , . Tx:: ... -. . ._ a ! .- - ,..: , . k. w.,:. .fi yy ^, .. i.r __ _ A� a.,n .•: ,.: .. .: sv" ,,. a.: �' .... ,.. �. .. ,.. ut .9' .,.'.,..IN- i .: fir/ �►� �r� 'A" Z r I � N Cr IM "e•2gt_._1 �fl..wr..h ,...,-r.,:. -r9N tt___7�.---'Ill. 1mV lV. 't,..r� �1I I ' I y - 1. of � �i. ��� � �U�.� 'd'. .�'.,. U .r ,gtU'4 }f „,. <t JE,MwMi �'. I I I ♦ \ .: /� ! C 1l, �'T7+ '— - �yy�V YS5�:0 I Y' r �v♦ - i . � N,317[lY -�•(„ ����t ��..� l /� '- '^ �' ✓ Vt./- ✓TV��L./'L• .. W , �M I' _ _ d N. iI 7: -e � , w,, �; J I x ` r �,� �Q C�.� d�� .. — �_ '` �' _ _.a G U ~ Z co •• 4 •a, �s (/ ♦J ��. ` +/� 7'x V r, i f t I 0 F- �_ - I t� ":���;��' � j ' .,rq,; a� i i � iI I 1 ' i I _ __ - � \7 \ - j -_ N�.N ��G'i,oY.- � _�,e .j`�2 ,'''•, �A'"•'' �` _ :.,' C� to Z _y ; rP.[M dSFRI .t E �1 I y �\` 1 I�� I I ✓�"r \ �- T-'- Cc 0. � � !, _ s - N'._W ��v,L�c �JI�✓ .,. •. � J _ to �,fii "_!t f :F.R' 1` �a __ _�, - - - r�- + ._ Lam-' � ...I:s .���-+��•'� �,. : i-... �.� ` �-.:� � �_ G i'ti. ��� - (/�J \ LL C O. W Rti • 9� __ K,J� f i fit+ cy saV �`'� ,� 1 I 1 x - . �-- - .. - � -` WARtNG :• r •.so R i.• v �� I I 1 I I I I I I �, G t !� N _J Z Co F— Fx -� —�. f �-- Slta Gt G.�. . > ' _ o z W VICINITY MAP I = ���� o k,4 t. S4,4 x I x 1 ► xl _ - w �'�' ( (� a'► � �,� /� G, y I___-� ___�,._ ;-• - -_ _ — ,- - -_ i GAP � � Ada `� Gdr.��-�1� CIS'Y �,' �� f�^�`E^ T f ��' �Z ✓� - - - - mac. © � Lit C.� i0N FO ti I _ - „I i 1 i wy' ►11 �� L �Af aja��FLolb•i '� �� tJf: .. h �ii oltsUJ I` . , 1rEAR Gr T,�;;�. I T I I111 G _�._A'\- O =EE SHEET L ' I e A m a1 .. .. .. ,.. ... ,w-. .�... .r ,. ,... .. __. IN 141 y , U - ll -- �. iw , >we r� - N r:tip Go G ?"E ,I ' � �: � . EX1�IN� 8 I � a G► M: �'* �� LO T J ' i L A �� to 'II\ a w- ke a� Grp �_ CJE NG� ;�. � A -� - -- - r i H `---_ - 41 . A 1723 �-- frX��TG -Ar•J� �!► G ` Z �/C A`� �"o G `+E 1� � �- fy L- `�`''f\;= Ai., �---r d� P. 6/8 0 raCL - -- - LENNON PLACE, OF CM SI T E PLAM ,- , I __ x .. 60 _ Z > Cat 'f •�ME a jIr T v cqI Lj#2-•..' W/y W 1 oo--I v .: ? } X � I I o f Co Cr. II �--Nt�;aL tau G!,�D',.�J �'��. -',s►�K-- � ; Ll- •� r---P -� - T��dV_ rA�i CIA, rr SOUTH ELEVATION 4) (1) (1) %_ 3 � Cu Co 010 -01 m� let v 1 4� NA• N z -. :: .. ,.� - -v.. ..,r. ^. . ...a.v .....- ,.;::,. ... -._... ... .. .. >._ ,. •._. ,.. a .,.... .:: �. .,66 p _. ,.. .. ... .. _.... ,. ,..a-._. _. ._... .r.,- . ..�, G..,... -�U._.., .. fir ..�.. ... .. .::,2! ,. f y� _ >, ». , F m . cZk ttoe :. � 1 a• � .`..• . 9' �. .. i _i... , ^x ..:,.. >.. �. ,... im cc - �! 01 t x,C•' — - - _ 1 Co 4 EASTELEVATION ' 0 S L`L, w a cl: a J U. Q .11 FLOOR P L1'�1 WLL w W : J Z Co I'-C) / < W 02 0 tea . rC x d' . _ - ----- !>tJ1l�2�1<0� I..1 x �tJ!LbING► ! �2 ' VIZ I 2-D a lt .,.. ! w �....; is . L� � � :-. � . q,,.r,:. .'.:." �.�'..: `..�4.'�., � �-.',._ ♦ � � .. 'w1 _ C'. f i � _ r =e re, sy .. N . - .J.:...}�-. '�., N .. e p .a:;z- Lu .r w,....:�:-_.,tom .,,_ .,g�..�.. �.... _ . ��.,�r .hs.-.... ..•, - — .;� - I I I r U) I _ 0 QRaF Ess/0iV ., a oRD T, Pq q�F � CL Z T ' ! `C x . 6i 9 SECTION Aft- tic fill /d , OF CA1. �l0IZT44 OUNDATION PLAM Ir - tom' -- n e R: ai _ r E o46 S L I COL• , Q ' I I C U k ' sLA lv Got^�G2ETE. �� I O I .—� y 8 -+ ----- ---T J 7 r: , W 4 cr) cc rn.5 COD STREET SWEEPER CLEANOUT PLAN � ccU) 138TAIL —Co4GICE-rE N — J APJA T _ _ -� — - -- - -- - -- ---- - --_-- -, -- ------- �A� }C CIV, N " s b --- — 11 .a,. z t ., , . ,. _. r�4.V/ Oc,/� (p.S'M:: A., i � . .,. ,.:o, � .,r;.. , . ,a; .. .. - .," .-:.« .• ,.. .. ,. _. •.r ::,h.. e .-:n, L---- 6 G fax. x: w«} D ,. : ; Lu L� aG. x f.� .J N CZ. a � d r 3,{� SECTION WAL � PAN � - m —_ � �x69 x 8 - I i w w. _ EA. SIDE Go►.; %a 'f- Z ,,J o 04 ui cc n- LL I Ja w 4. wIU cNO� . 0 Z: � B �DETAIL r2 f I I DETAIL 2pe, -- - - - - ---- ..r� Gv t�C� �•L e�G t< � ..; t vl --- .ar • 1 9 a a . .� i ::. .n'1 f4{f .;• n_y,.,, L_:. .. "'�,:3.:#. ,x,:ar,. ,.,m. i-.:: .i•:. '3,�W 4', yc: 1 `Kr - - \ n. n V ram" '� �G � ti 1 • • . • _ � e "• .' -�, "' _ /�I \ 1 h ' d Q V� ate. \ f 4 BIZ. X /� I° \ / ^\ -�` i -- -#a`5 IBC i N F � f aA`G�f :P0 t Lop S - ✓ % : „ �` — --- --- �x<ox Io(ALT5- 16. �r1� 3L� . ! 1 tL'E 2Oii WI1 - LA►P I ' f G 61,4G1e~ FLA. F�.�O�i �JL.Dr$ l tl GONG F3► v k c / L �C �4 I ''nn 2 C�YACx V J 4�oLiG� 6t2oV'r ---A^�5 • , / 4 x ,2 A. 15. ! .2v �. U. �— — — — L — — — — • W f- w / - — { fi I W�� 5 ICv�O.G. -- — - N n, — J -O�G2� ��E•c,� � W - � 1' �LOG K. [■1j L4 4 �.. �� za Io J J- Z -,tad GO N i' I _V r"f' } T p � Q..OF CA 72111-1 r 2 i _ - fit `eo �' I �--- �.� E�2.a'hoc. L • • i .off -O A_' +-ems �A. a`E�r�o'� �. UC.�uR i! l } �1 73 DETAIL I DF- .. TA-IL « �► T'�► I �. D 1�TA I L IDETAIL -.. , - <•1!-* ."!Fr'» '"; x snr!{r++f+°e'•"^ ^,wn: , ...-;r°,#t au,-, -., 'yxx 3`. _ 'a,'k7,.ye .t Y{�": '.w "�.. r4 .. ,ry ° at. 3 _t. ♦e ..'!. .. a, 4^. °i' 'S a,. a c. ,t.T •'p * - ,. . .. t... t 5• �` .-., .. .e ... r' , ?i- '�[' .. .,. .. `%. -. :. .. s S n.f.., x„,.. ,-.._' a Yt .; r n...i....-. .... ... `Y ,•4.r .. ._ n< ::- ,e'.ark .`Y x.a ..'.... , ': "# .r+. .n a •. .. r<., p} .$.:.-.a.. .,... -. tea..xw-.. �+s. .ms.- .. f., '. .. .. . ' T :i .:;". 4 .1^r4 r;•.. , �'. ' - °� _ Z o co { ,o w q 000 \ Wa W 1 ! N 0 T `` U) ' I A Ig N 0 T A PART I CL PART I � mmm it .Z91 170•tII I .� o c o ' ifi I I NOT NOT NOT O .Z R I � � > F y5 �127•�I EASEMENT A A A Z ca co PART PART PA RT l/S E I TI G P R IN " S F x1ST ohs m x L/S L/S N j - - - - -- - - j ;' N W ; PROPOSED ' x S�G� ' j 00000 L/s •� c Er ap SECOND-FLOOR �a� �2�t��_�1.�__ , ,.--� _-,- --,r- --,.------ -� Y� ---- p f�^-- . �--- : ADDITION EXIST c .�(k,t, 1 S oo. 5 SERVICE BAYS �� �ij d� 1 r. — — WKU I Lu -TU MATC_H e?05'TINC� ( Od U I I l � FWU ' EXISTING PARKINGI,1'(UWd� ` l MJD t�'lol-! 174 75 i?4. 7� I�.�. IC.) 5 _ �- -- ---- -- - - - - ' ' c: Z Z c EXIST s Q G Z r+ WELDING W Cc W AREA i !Y a EXISTING i . -j to Y k LL C.L. FENCE J Q i 2 t, • EX. SHOP' P 4 r Fm 1./y'I � !iJ .. .j � � L. �.•, _ s. w ,.., _ _. r-.. � .. ... _ rx._ •wry-- <r•-t N Q �c = h Z r hG ` gZ hG o ' z CD uJ 4. I 4 F� .( � ;'L p . t.uo Ac (. I�o AG Y w ' I U ! � I EXISTINC. TRtJCK PARKING w s� �X1�, , EXIST h' j lhU O`3CIt�111G- DEBRIS BOX N N I STORAGE - - -w (GRAVEL) w w I ll•► EX STI G TRUCK A KIN G (GRAVEL ) 1 - XIST 6'-0" HIGH SLUMP STONE � _ E WALL //` I ' EXIST. FUELING AREA � $IIx�3 �. �io5• Z1 17G? I ,� J, 17" e2 14e. a.7 0 �X��• �,.QNt (-I�I uG— C tcc�t Gx � �o� � n.. _ ; FsT. Gv E5 rLENNON PLACE 8 r 0 __ t /1 F ' p�=1�/L ,D�l�'1%'�,4�..l-} �Ex f<�-.� - ��u�r�ct� : +�.� � ',.�►.1�N = � F„ � ' 0 Q cr � V _P U LA M � 0 - -- _ --- - —_ __ �UILOI►I!a �f F �1.l�// 2��rJC' SF 0 W 1 "= 40 FEET j D SCA-f f�r',r' (o p+�jO S� t; (. �j N 1 CIOn01 W SI-� 10. 21v 1( = 44•�'�Vo `5 o Tin. m J 0 < J i TTt 77 m a. i In 4 0 It AA -- - y� s. .. 4 .{•x r vop "� .. �.v. �.. `�. ,.< : ,,.. .. +.. ... ., .. .< ... ci co -.. # , , .x .- .. ,•: -., -.: , "-...., ,. . �,. a ,.. A,.:J. '+ ' C, y�,gg :-6.s ,v e a A e.. r F s r i i I , 'JLu p; , cc_. s.. •� y r_ _ �,a5:'. ,,P.,- .._,X,.,,*.�^- •. - .- �-Cr..S �s... - t� _ TIE ;: rl T i,i �. � _.. _ 1 � "'i--„>rs;< a �_• t_j _„"1(.�--._----'- ,r',� , {{7-11 i`. _ �Aid t E (� 1� ' :.M� it T"�-._. ._.—_ji - ri- ♦� , l� �F.�-L ���� �� �. `_-�.�-_'� k.y�".' r �•+ C; U ♦. c SOUTH k} CD - N , cc co Al tIt �I CX Y • DY.1 W + O,^ , Cj• ,ram r ' 0 L , it I U) x.. ' _-' .?' , ter»• ., 1K, - ,�{ W � t I • Y I - r 1 t -- i , e _ .-T.�__v...v �✓ '__ _ Fe.� i'{ Skw`i .r. cc W a. - + r rr co U. J , , A ., .. x �g Y2 :y y^v •a - T,•}"off..'.£ r{^'2 y,x• ,. - d S• d . II r n V M ems• W ,t, :; a•...-C"J.$'x:.+..a�.:a.,'�Y4 e1ri.�t-'�.2��.* .: �• :.�5«-a x1�a..� .>="�xit,.xS-..�.wi..F.2 s � fi T.Y. ._.._..�c..fY.r o- -. �..i.. 1 :Y' .te -V - _ '':.'!s.. ! '":' 'k n a a _., °, ... w. .. � f -_ �.. r_ .. x.. •... , -: ,. �: ... r,. a .• .. ` .Yk:;,. . W .•v. .., ^,� � �'; y:4 `. � —�/ I � - ,. , ., s,. >�' :..� •.. .:.�.: .�+I_..:;�.� e-�..,. t.,..,s ..4.•,~.,:. ,•z l-ro. p�;'�"`: �1� �v�� � .-.. {�• -I ._�K e r.,,, �-..,<x, -. �a- .. $' �'' -'`y.' S._ I"�•, �... ..j'�. ;�Gam' � Q y I h .y.:.r ,,, ,.. n y? N,-.'- 7i V- d::..t !l'` ..,. '..y .vi y��{4„ e ry � y , i. :..,4:-' p ¢';..R3.r• k' `.`4q y,Y"�... # t iF_1. h : '2 :: ,.:. ^.,6...,'y.,, mror i,. .,y. 4 w ,uryy,. f .-•.::s ..5. F-_.iq �'}.. !. ,�> f- t • M >- .�by: �.. v-• ,.- .. $h l ---------------- itJ A 4 '1 Rd -i6 it , fi ''I ;t 1 j x i; '''n'ck ,;� Y' ,`+.•Mz" 'ru rrr'3� -.,�.:j �,`': ,j ♦ �'�J'� �`. e t Y y � �. r. �, .fir-.,... .,.. w..a,.a '�p t � •'v' VJ Ia j uu lu� . w 9 0 oc , (nil ; Wft �a Q ' 1Cc40 t I •i �` , e `f , ,�* R JJ{{II 1 1 ., , :, y'+ v.. .«:3 ,,�.fiee - ro..: °.: .. _. ._' •t6;� ... T .. �a- -.. r ..-., , _ .. y• o -... ,fIAJ. , , : ,.,.. .... . - .:."T .., ... .: ._ a :', <.., i..."�d'�$' ? n ,.' .-.. .. ..:.. C `- ,af•. „ -:., -.+' ;^! � _ i " -•.. ., P ::s_ .. ,. � .:.,..: :;L c. ..s t. :. .... F £q P.D.. �. ..: .>, -Y:. J^_,,:. M•,r ,�w¢ ..X`s f �`:-. � :y_ mac. .., 5..a.:,- ,: ll.. .. :, ,. f.:: `. ...:. ,. : .. S•:: E :;;., „_ r . �..... .... •@ -k `.51.[. •`Y,e.'' - .x ,.,..s. ., :,. �. � i.- §g.�Ily ... .; 4 ..'�- ,,:_ ..- .... ,. : .. � .... ,. , „ ,-. <: �• :,....4, •.. '#-.4.„ �. rrie'." :$- ,-�.. +swq"•{ ,�! �e„ ;°.�'T-. .,,e..- ..:.. - I , . ., z .. , : -: •' ,-.ms' .. � n+: , 1... a �.sk•. 'r2 f'ys�� :.F.: 9 f C co E ti r L r - 0a. o O . MM c > Vlei y 1 C ca ` N'U . I CY co f. a s- , , . R , O cc CD 0 .,:f:. ,,,..... ,.,,.,: • ?r, a-..-. - .. .. „. s, ;i: 1 ,fit ,,.:. __ •4:. ou ^ i PAW QLqK aI ; • m r I v n w *` I I I I I � I i I I � «Y .�j�._,, I I ! •+•_ - 'a+ - - " I - Z (:� x ITtsue'' 1 _ co I I I I ( II ,,:._,,.;• ° I I - `4}- "r r r, r •' � I 1 ,v'a' ,.k a.�. O Io., L yy « _. 4 .k �. CCcr :. I .:: . ;,f^.. � _ � _: ,. TOM ,�. '• - �„'_ :.a� �'. _. a�<'�C"''`. i a hy- �. a I V k -,• : ,.. -. ..: i � - T 1 I I I I r� w. d - [ YCr _ r ;,k�,: X-_ -, - - - x , Ln CO ,. r :.. ...`4'" i , ! � I -A- -. -^;-t`�- I , I , y . a .�.. � ., I w •• n .„ � y.R .ka... 4 L1J Ilka :_': .-_•. , f y :•4 ar ({ .�} ,t�.,t r, � ._l ?. .. ... � ♦, � - - iii. ,'•f i<t,5 x fir.y. _ 4 Tom. • 1 y c W Q ' I 1 &i.•g � . i _ _ -2 i r c •.:m. t,r. .7s .,.., -. .' z ..... . ,.!.... : - :+, .5,., :��,•2 ,} ��'�'..r '°� •�d.y� 4 ,. fir,�,, .,. : .;,,s :�E-;�., �+:ss...,. .,.,,...4�,;r+.` ..gym. .:t: N „ : t. ,-s:. �� .. -, ,. „ I •. -. � ... t .. � ... - � : .r. �_, •, _ I I \ -i .. I � 3 - >`..:. ? Y- ^.,. ,.n, .'�xn ,. 'fwx� - r k •.< .,,,�";- °�._. :. .:., .. r I r a i 5,. r t"4 () r I -. L .r c'�._- '..1. _ : �.�_�`., ':,`r•*: ,meµ . ,gyp. .r a �r "r d'�'.-: "2t �'��.s. :� � � .r:: , , _. .. _< .. ,d .�{,�. -i. .. ,. , . --. �: r S, : ,r...; t.-. _ :" �V.►• •5 3� , L fi I' t; ..1 .,1-. .'.: �-, '� _,. ,� :; -. f .3� .. , .1 M,. C -.-� I - � - ♦ ♦. 1t1 , _ T,� �Y .tM��-' .i -i:1` ', ... �,.,r•-. _. ,�Y .s •. S.. _:. :N -: S �., , e..:-.. `.,, .:,.,.,.i � !.: .v. -.. : ...:..: -S. .. ...r ..,,.F.. _l.. :. Y t •. .: (' .. .:: I. ,- ., r 1 .. . _ ��' i I i L L,_ a� � � i - „ ... i•C � • .T- .� .., -. � ik .:. Z .. �« .� r, t.: �. » . . .- t _ I .: ♦ �+ "93 �. -- h•,-. . t 1 _ .,t,>u. 14 .y_ r�4a>, -t -. .�r`�.T I .+� O ,. ;.. •,.rti,»+-.. - ,. T. :.- ' : .� ...r. ,.,........ ,.,, .-. _ a .. •. .: ".. .. •: ...r'i ,r ._. ..-,ped�+r... • . , '. � 1 :. 1. _. - t ._ ..'fa � _ I t � , t ♦ t ,.r 1 t - �y`' �4% _ .;: a , _ 1[:Y' f `•�'1'� _ -'.,;.- ^1 eiR ., .. .. - ♦ ,_ : fit. • -•.+�.. I j ,.. .. .,- a -.-•sr » ...� �. - � hw - a1/�rp'}. � .+1 ;- r w... :♦S .:.. •w ,. ga_ _��,'. '.. a 4 . ,.., u. ... . �.. , -- ,, � 1 .} - - 'y'�::z%' ::- •� ca _. :- __ —_ - -' � I - - «" 'r"';'?�r -.k4.'..�rl �'b r• �"�a,'� � M , ' f�__'q�:A". .. w� -i ar#.e .� t. .. 7 ' „�' , � .. . c :. �` �. a � ., - _�_- - r fi °�' �',. �..��� ,v r �•`__-� ,g",�. I : -r- ,, �. :: ... i'. • �' r. _ �.. _*: `1' ._ ... ri'I ZT.__T..__�-.«T_.�1T1-.' ,.. ,.. . �►.. ,..' •r....r .s:. .^._ _ i. �Y � '}�.�.-o?N� •I 1� ,.z� I� .,. , ..'a»."�, 'fit,:.. t^- .. �. „ -, _ -• _ •, -.. «'` �. .. � a.;.. ..._ i .a-,,.. y . _.. -. a. r. '6..,,..,.-„ ::. t. i' - sr --�--+•,-- �- I "M:L+'. ' � - ..K,�.. -. : .--1- �-,, - r � r.. =3-. !r{{i Af. o- •.�.}y'� 9 � R...4 � �-- T!.,,j , ., _ ---T' Y'" _ _ `L r — - � .l-__ _L 4 '' ' a rl , - r! y io t+ 1 ( 1 1 _ i f AA r f I Q • _ LL ZC/) LU LU LL W o0W 0 W W it a o, Q � ac a a CL a 4 , . r W m - • 3 Iv141 r: At • , • • v . d r - I - ^ s - i�"'a.. - < -.c• —j,'��'7. ,, �-., �f ,' , �'. J+.%- r ~.. a, � _•,? E`-� t:; fit. �f `! 41 44 Iz ti F� eY �• r YY ,�,.,.,.,. • ... x.�--'- _ gas„ � ;��� � "�_ 1,� i{�S'r!� v ._�.� _ �s �} - �.t�.,,_F�fj�• _ - '�-� "- '•fir :,�` ` � �3•. � j rr.� � ��' k '-.�-1 - - — . ,x.:,,;-� 51 . y -41 -- • E'NNON - P. LACE- : t kT c o • • Z 42"'n" 0 cy) kk V)= I r7; 1 rm ca p ul r- 0 co :j Z., Ix .0 NOT Z w cl) NOT M TA icc A PART p A R T cc NOT NOT I i jai NOT e I 1 0 :2 15 SEWER us- 3 U7.Po I J, I EASEMENT A A A L/S PART ev L/S E I T I �G PART PART.1 4P RJIN OVNes, oo 5f s L L/S UJ PROPOSED A" SECOND-FLOOR eA rs A,p L/S EXIST Ki ADDITION SERVICE BAYS f:i�we W/&mrrnev TIT EXISTING PARKING w 1w CJE!�qvle f5k , nP7149" 174 '7* EXIST WELDINGII w AREA EXISTING -C.L. FENCE EX SHOP cc Z . oll PM 2�1 tv- AC t lot;X 4: �k • I J Ll t 4 J, rm 114,51 PM 11452 PM 17 4-rYL 4 I J(o M, t.10 Ac y X 11 4- cr D EXISTINC TRI,ICK PAUING EXIST DEBRIS BOX STORAGE x (GRAVEL) w w C51ST. 5w"r srgs EXISTING TRUCK PARKING (GRAVEL ) WAt-L- SLUMP STONE WALL XIST SW' HIGH EXIST. FUELING AREA c 1'.a" W/ Maim 'Cis, em-7 co IL ,. elu. loot US A CL 0 tn_-- !M Acqf;v Ao \ov/ w &L Trim" LAN' Lk W 0 I"= 40 FEET � A�T�Iµ') JU Q LAIAD SCAf I W7­ 8c7o c� (n w T sly ,� a.4�,q 5� : IQ o cc lco 40 ilT I T _ 1 . ........ookl;,�L lF4 7 1 1 opw ry 4no ... -=.t•.. ., �Lh:: .,, -. .. .... _ .: ..'�' .. _ -.. - :a., _.. ,A. :,. fi.. _: ': k .. .... 4"�`..: � :. rrt. .:R • ... w.... - .. w.,A A � r..'.`'^!a, IMF . t .. ' <- 4� ,- fix• .,! a t r ' : s. ..... .. ... C. - .:: a - . fin.. _ ,. t. _.. •,.,: _." X.; -; ..-'. ., k CO : v , ui a Ir I Are 1. cd 0) �y a 1j: 74 — 1 III • ' I I I ' ' � ' � ' , ' I � f � � I I ! I ' I I ' i S 1J`1I , 1 � 4 ' 1 I : 4 M- � � ' �. l �.,: I , a.:. +. n...� :.. .. G... ,. s• i R �,..,. '�,. h.... ,:... v....M., "1 #:I 'Sys{ I, I � I i I �' �. , '..k k �.,:. � � .,, ,+�4. ,y xr� � .,+• .5::.'r a..y ��'.-f'i 4 r}a.. Aw.t . "�ry",'. "•i-. ref, :. t I I• 1 r I 1 - I L I ! I 1 .. I +ttppp�., - f. � -1 � � t .: � � i 1 I '@....,,.z '?:.....' .' � ':. t ,•::'r:. x y.,: ..�s ,r., ;«'......'. ,2, r.. .�'.q,... .. ... :. .,. � �...: .. ,.. ,.a l I � � I .- _ , 1 � 1 1 � ., li � 4 i � •,�q '� „,x Yam, +d +rk•.:,.. Sr:.G Y;^.. ,. s<.Y... :.- - _ - _ 1 - I { 4 +t..# Y. - I I _ 1 ,,R *;" x. .. :.�.-i.' :m.r" d x„ s_�°n .'r ,;, ....�; „2',:�n... .;,,-a� :�~� .: w sa• rc': i.. �� ?"- �—.tT�-' ( �� .l- _ �•�--�'�'"�— -= —.—.ram I ,-•--lT-�—,__�-r—T i' � _. � / I 1 L 1- 41 IL i ' d CO z 0_ a 0 a F— V ui u. V 0 W InW W y Q 4 a O J a {(D40 , ;s;"--, — r,;. ,,.- +q^ic ..:' -.f F"'�� -,-. -+:S :� '�w•f� ;s-g ;'#�;:''?',7r,�aK.>.;i� a ;,'a::: >?r*n. •le°a` _ ,, a. y , -! ; -. .,, s .. r . > �.. bP, >. i ,$ a 3, .a ... E .. _ ,. .. _ gv,-,&., 'A:y:.. ,♦.. < a ... st. f.. R. z. ,. �,, r +,. "" °i-k'. ..a-"r ,k. t .. .. i M- .,i... - .. Y.,. r. , , a ,. ,.- r.. .:. >' .; ,;F I vV. -e B :l ,'{%.+x'i'!`o- ";T'i ,71 t..,, .. .. : ..k ,y. -_:. a-. :c c. ., , ,1:- a« .. a,.:r_ .,a 3i"�: '#� ..x` r,.. _ v !il... ., _..: : , ".: - : _.w .. ,: ,+ .✓.. ,. ,, - Y, $-ll; m,,-,, "dl:-. Y may,. r: fC r , 1" .. ., , _°4:i'� - ." _. a ".'.. ..., ..,..., r e b m ., i 1A4,,, ' 11;,, _ -t. < 't,,+.. ,: -... ..a ,, .._ {, t, �s.. - s. Zti. .d, ."`#e 00-100 r." ,. .. • � > el -. I +i ;f°:: . .. .i,. I - #. ~} S, tom; t. :.: , .,.:.. : , f , ,- a--.r: .:, ., , ..g .: a q �. IT a,., - j.. 1, I�'v ^y ♦ eaa_. ..t r.. M x_ 1. , ; s£ z. , w3I I-ix - w '"-' p _ i a ' ; as' • ., � ' ,P '£ 3 C t0 T" L. ` t ' s, r ' W. zt , . - .' - Z *4 O C7 Cl) > y ' ��.y Uy I - tb ..I. U) Cr /�� �. V �J t O t' \ k -. W w r _ . ;L F $s, III ... p... a,-,,I >j 'L � y ;,f, - - I - I - 1 -� W. �'i�° il °`. 11 a , , of - • , 4I J 0 S. - _ . ir. ^J: -. - .. - C a _ - � 3: t; ! !�. - . , )', , . I # , AA`` ff Ix _ I _ W ig#d 'j '} t11 h 11 O .� - n < tr r U L.r .. _ y: .: t . �a q�.� - i x ,4,. _.,. 1+{}S _" �� y"i. M � L - W YI +� 4 r•,'f > : - . .. I ,�J . h f . -j .. 4 A.>, - - - 1. , n.. . a . 1.' - _ er' ,- - ,,., _ .,Lisa .fir [ ..a. .x.t x*i�a<. .,�. c 9 ..� w?J-,::,- Y' .4...i - I II,= +c.v ,, ;f .I _ • i . ,. , d. . .: .. 1, :+tic<.' �. .> -+". , e. ,,.. , .,: - �:. •' v o` , s - , . 4.. f c- ;, g ,- , $ i3' x h r J. it �` .4 ~ '^ 1. . - ✓�, "a x• .,�,X__ --" ,A' '°1. •? .y.1 '3' ' :, Wl v -:' ": A ,+ - Y' t • fix.. - y"e If :, W . . - e r<. i p,, ry ,. ._ .. t - f .. f .,. _,q �,-_ ,: P Y IP. f , ..gam : r .. sR t+ L::.1 - .. If r s.rP T s a u ,- f k-.1 3.' f .:.R :;:' '`r;: ..„' t "b„.y.. �Yp 7 7 .•&R:,- si - "'.. ,. _ �- _ _. i ,. .__ . J. < ..;.,,., .. -. %- '�Fra Sat . si'! ,-c' - - § h < v, a. u. ,� r. .,. # . . .. ,gg , j. _ # # z. .,,- , .. >, .. , n .,_,. :, .,,. ,.< .-. a. is , ..- , .l R '�i r>C'k:.< i s tc � # ".• _ .3 jj� « - .._,._ t . _ _ 'i : . .,: , f. -: a :. .. > >,,: ,. . a r < , +:_. S _ , ,.. 'i t.r . r • ,. . .. ' f � , , . , .. , j(.��,, > ... ., : 4 ,r }-:'.,: .. fir` ... _ . <P- ,(i r.. i ,:., . 'Y: , .<. _^i^. . , f . - , �:a { - IP �i...aa+ 44 < h .t_i �_ - k . �, m : , = x z. ,1. ., ys a- 3.. a c. . .. a, R _,, x <t , t. x` I . .: : '.,.. .r. v +,:. :e .. S. .. .f.' --% 5 t >r T. •. i :-3. ' ,. .4. z I , t t � [ - , ;,", � R _ + v : . 44 s _ .:. .._, . , _, �, 1 I.. _ .: ku 5 ,_ •r. , ..,.. • » ;."ic-- s ,-. .. ra a ... f. •t, "zf ,.: . ,..t :' ", i i Ll- I : _ -. xs -Y rT . 1 r -.:1 _ -.as ..t.. Y'_. , <.,. �i Y - 'v , _ : a 7TI- : ,,, r, «.. x I .; _ - .:. , .:. , _ , ,,;: u 1 I : I • 1 , l ,. . I I I i I i �_ i , i 1 1- I . .. - € -.. I I I ( I I I 1 I _ a P I I II , 1. , J I I _ . � , I k , I I i ! E I I . i i I i t , . ,. , 1 I �- I I I I I ( ! , I i ! i I ! I ix! i , 1 -+-r- r 1 i I I 1 I . + I I I 1' f } i i i F i I I I - % I ! ' ,. . I I I � i I , I I I : ( , t ! 1 ( I - - I I t , I z ` f r ii I i ( 1 I a i i I ; I t I j , Ii 1 ' " I I ! I i I , I ! , , j I I I I I +.e b.t t - �: -' Y 1111`,a 1 I 1 i 1 , .y Ii 1 I I I I i z 1 1 ` i ( 1 I i I ". -a. � "s. , ! I I I I I ( I I 11I1 I I , f x,, 1 f ' 1 1 I I f i I , 1 I M Ii 1 r z I I I I I i I i I j•. : �. �p I I I f � , 3 �' I I. w % 1 ,. x ` r r,. i I , 1 1 a w, I , .ate ) :f�: pp _ ?.N ff _ .+I c , _ ��• »a, �.. , .,. » _ x. t ..r - , 1 F I I I f� r ,�. a ,;; r� >. I I I ` � : it ! I ., ,. _ � � . ., �� Irli I I'�, _s. 1 ! I ( 1 1 , 1 r 1 , .t„ ?. .. , .a'., ...... ... ...r. 'i < •d ,. E_ .. :'.`« , v. .,.. I ,I r. I I �, i I ,.. �1 Y ,- s .. :s,. t. _ .F,. ,,, !' ?"., .R.,M, .:.-r-s. , ....,n?..w - *'Ic.... -"', i s , 4 ,:d. 1. :..,:.., ,"&.••,f,�,.. R e;. ., .i`..:.. M R,'6:fy�^�r',...$... ..,d.,. c _<r"r�..kT I I I f 1 - I �. I i _,�__�, I { y, v ,h.:, ..nm ., ,?'If tr: :{<- 5S '...t .-w'9.,h• ",'- _ .t^ f I I , , I 1 4 -.. - , 1 1 < , i �ry,� a�>� y� 4 g $; ; _-...a. >4�J .y.:r _.,i✓l-u.%- _:..,,, tw. As".�"K .1+; L » •`?,v - _ , t • t i I _ - r r � 1 , -- _ �l. 1 r 1 T T }1 — I� i a ' i , t _ 1 rZr Tl T - I - - - T_�_:I - 1 ., y .__ - --� - __�_-. _:..__.1 ..�._.-.T�-t...,-.�-- •� _- -_ T I 1-�1 Y .,*I , ♦,"1�` d A':�W _ll T-..x'.r '{ ••` <,i '!-M _��. r I - --r - - - t _ �_ T_ -1 l I r-- i I I I , :��T- f — .. I -1 . � I I I ! — i ! r 11�- I I f -. ---�-�. - i 1 _ I T T �� --� ` -r � ( _ ���� 1 + 1 I ���{�� I x 1 L ; j - 11 - — ,,l t T�-1— �I ) r 1=1 lr n I , ? /~� , Lt +I I L�' . ,max- '�� �,�tr l �v 7 - 4y�- E- �•� I -=�_I_1�Y _�____,__ I ____- -- -_ _ _ ___ - - - I �� . . . I- 4 - I - 1 - I b . . t , 4 , - t . . pf: , f !: ..-. - . ,Y' r. O - O �, •. ' ° , _ r o_, o, �_ Q . O W c E . - L I I . . - (n V ,�� .�11�L . I . I _ 11 1.�, o-1, ggc I . L �-� i. �,t h. . O - (n c { I - . - uj- . I . - . I.* . . . U) U) �a I - I I I � W rf _ t. I . 0 a , r I - I . 1 1 . I L. I I . I . . I I &, ..1, I 2 , ©' J I I 0I I I . L . I ``� �l . I I CCL Q. . �n . I '- ,. . - - x " I : I I ,-��L . .I I I . . ., I - . I I I 1, I I I . � i -4 1 Ir I I - . I . I . .I I . L I . " ! . ""! I i, L I - 1 ­4 - f . i , I I - I I . 11 I . . I 11 , I , '. . I I . :- 5" , I : L I ,- I I , . ,- _. t • . - I ,i o ws ,. .: - F a-s• . . -. - , y .. f ,.; ,, I � - - - - ✓ .-. - , j - - _ ,.� ,. . j„ ',. y$_,. T an g Vie'•. :,Ttt,�+`r'.'4" .v. - .,S VF,u. 4 •.- ,:- = s-.V. e t a. € F v: r .• .. r , r ,o , 14 Lo r, G TREE a 0 CD `t o I ! NOT i W A � � NOT �MQl Tcc A PA RT i r PART I CL _ •�.� 179. I � cow co i I I I� I NOT NOT NOT � � a„ I � � � I I � � , I I � I I i� � ; I ,. Ova •- �g'� 1 IS SEWER TT 0 C •? . � 3Z7•C� - EASEMENT A A I A 1 .J� e0 v, c� L/S E I TI G P R IN L/S , �1 PART PART PART nsT o+�-� 6sr F-) � SF - - L/S L/S 4 — — ^PROPOSED a 15�� i _ p�Y 1p 41 L/S SECOND-FLOOR ST a� � 6 ADDITION7 4r SERVICEEXISTBAYStc ,s� -- _- =_-=�i ,� � — --a• (�,25o i = W/ Or�� St-Ut•1pK� Wht,t.. I {_' EXISTING PARKING P R�2�D U-- Frl ' AV1* 'ION 17�}.7 4�j I 174 I W 4y 5t�►uh i �' �� -- 114. 715 EXISTAmu— I d WELDING Au M .. AREA _ EXISTING 2lnCr S1= i r f ! 1• - _ ; O H C L FENCE 2 EX SHOP 1 f.. ♦ • • o-,..2 'o-.., � -Wi•.. . >«a. ,..:,, ;. •: k .:. xc ...x.y P &.. ... =s I'..1t1 aiG , ! III ��-''�-�' ���� .I.: �- ���% �h�c� 2 C � I P 1 M I'14�2 p M 1�14 Z. I f'N1 1"145'L , — I•I!o hG .I& Ac z -v A6 Ell S IN TR CK PA KINGEXIST ' DEBRIS I z Z I N LKN D 5CA'�Pl41Gr BOX �. ' STORAGE N N (GRAVEL) w W , I (.A�toSch�tNG— .. ' , �X1�. SwM �3tb}i'E � Pt,At1'('��Z r-- �/ l-�C1•��+�.�tF�Cr' .� ' EX STI G T UC PA KING Wht.i.. (GRAVEL ) Zg � ' F XIST 8-0 HIGH i Cl w 5 / ` SLUMP STONE WALL EXIST. FUELING AREAAL Ii ,1. i�Q. t .Lr ,l, eZ I74 75 148. 37 �X1 �.�N t�1C r p � - , - • 1 ', j I----- �C1ST. 0JF6 f �-LT�-� NON, P IAA � �- ����� ) � I�f1��F1 � �x%�'�•�Vt��..l, r"'�I�F.�� � �ISON R,�c(.� ;I ~ O �-- 11�� C •�. G�� w/�Ts a a - ,. w W anti �s i f r. a .. ;LAN -- , G` ) E w �ult.olu� � zrTp�l►s-� �2,°��o S ( 2. `� °�. ; ram.. = 40 FEET , r , p cc � W 00 A 0. 1(o Ac, 44(o"I Vo 5 f o o 0 1CP40 t REVISIONS BY r`< Kli ,4 VP�GvU,N� �;EP+K G K 1 - j I ,. .... ,"�„ .- � .. "�:., as^ e`knf`:._ ,.:-.yy, .. 2 k5, �.€ �,. , .°Am� "il' •q. fie. .€,. �..� f. W E 9 Q tJ I > q� C� - I I - • . I . O lot , i ( O 72 h d � 1 _ N i• _ I 0 cn 1 I I } I , ti i Irt � �i ��i ril���J�� nVYN `; ,� a i � �• Owe 51,:1 2 NE-W `^ 2- �u�c�1a NEw ► I � � � �. PIT { , I -__ STY L . ' �ayf se 7 7 Sr / : .ire♦ •.T C p� , . ,Y S k ;..... ,` °.4. s..«`, g'• .,,ee.: ..:r :... .X.{. a,.. ".r-. _ -: ply �� rt_ wa _ n 14 s h .., _ > .. y $ .f ,+�+i'•,.:. W...>...,,� air ,. ,. �' ,,r .-:z.,,s:, :, ,. '�.' !. ff A r µy , R I � sf • re � t t i f�l �✓!� ✓LT���v � J���. ✓'(ir.� DRAWN CHECKED DATE I. 9�g SCALE Joe No SHEET NORTH DF SHEETS s.r ,5 s PAINTFD 0M CLEAtIPAINT 1()O,)H J* t ta." a u. a. y t REVISIONS BY 3 I t JAIVR 22 F V ' I t l r r 4 ae , a.. , -. �..�.. .. ., , .. .r ........ , a . ... ._ �ys. W . v..,.... ... :. ems-- ..7 .. -.., • .e. .., r.- ...:. .: a• e.. .. , ,.... v^#'. , �-�,.. .. .. <':� , II[ .:. .., ..,e-.,� i,i x.,.. '4 +� .. ... ,W�.c :P ...... ... ..�..: ._ 1.:• e. , l x,qk.. ,.sFin. "� y,. ►. W :Y. "v u F» Fr , yp mr r q O I �p 32 • p c i a cn p .t .J W N ro w I . Ii I 1 • it IRRIGATION LEGEND SYMBOL DESCRIPTION PSI. RAD.j G.PM. I1501-56- EST '' I '25 ib0�-5 ?�.ErCr 30 ill ii ! i b Z4 A I TO KO 5'1� I2' a i^ ' ir L.r �wi GAS- ��,rrlly �`�c�-Y 'Dr 25 ! ''L� =,� ,5 N=1,0 11) P- , H F PVC GI.A55 200 LATERAL PI P5- ";5 IZE a.5 SHOVv'tJ i ``•+ �-7 PVG sc44 t 4v LATERAL IN 5L15.r--VC (UJDEr% PAS iN�) I �11 i ! ="'•'==a= PVG EL.ZG (ZIGAL NDUIT FoZ GONTRG' 444ZE� UNbE1CPAVII4)-5ZE A5 4HOWN 1 �o � C � I I. �' ----- SIG t,GH , kp MAINLINE PiP� -slzE As s►�vwN Z ll �i G 5GN , 4 LI e IN SLEEVE NGE12. .- I Pe o MAIN N CU ►�G U� t� 1zzm L.AGKFLD-f) ftvENTE.IZ: GX►ki tilt ►4 GATE VALVE; 0I1E!�60 T 113 - LINE-SIZE REMOTE coNTRoL VALVE: RaNg+RD Tao-h ELEcTetG RE#o(5 GoN'(IeDL YhUSL2 �1 ! I � r c CoNTRvL.I,ER, RAIrJBIRD GIG �,A ,v�1 co RraLLEK� i , �� �� ��� �, w I - © �� 8- G. I.•PR1�t�fZAM rt'f r �`ft I r q AL /51 oN Nlie J1 „ y _ . AL «: , �' i ,.. -:r, ".`i:d' :off' ,d.: �+ �-, .< � ?` .+„rt .,,.. '�F 7.: ..� `. " ,. :•-- a+., t�+.r !r x u ' 1471 ... fir+�/ � �/ y[/ Gyy, �j♦.���� 2///1• �yq� { ' ,i:. `' Y/I�I �!� • i'��V�1• (� �/ �D I ` •1� ' »Y"". ' : 4 fi ^y:. } {a {`: r4� r Fix � ,,�, ( r�ri ��� �G -tu R�n��Ir� - N�„< .,/ I� ti �r� tcr�f �12o�t.EK - � �+. � � �•r : EXI� ,,NG t��►� iNE IL Kl:MAJ�., , r�K,r`� EX ,, LG!� c�r� ,) � �a A"a 1 I I I I / i T ORAWN 61 �' �, t CHECKED I i DATE I I I SCALE I ' r is I" IN 11/4 , — F JOB NO SHEET URT�i 12 OF SHEET% •' PRINTED ON CLEARPRINT 1000H q - 4 , v,'S ' " REVISIONS BY i I �GLf?GrE�i �f�� - At'F2D�(,_LO�TiUN GF _�l.O�f�►�D �'��`J' CT�P.i A 1 i p • O • O O • • • O • O • O • O i �• � - - ----- ----- III I � I ��._.- - ------- y s l .:.2,. ..:.. .. x��.:�;r ..,. -.,.......- .,� m. .. ,...c. .; o- ':-r. .fi. g.x,. ►.may .. y I ., .. „v g � ,.. a. , .. �. Al _ r ' Q *c c v � O 0 r a O tLj N i= a , � I • � f` � is o �� �"KDN! -�'S A,1'�A A,I.d►.;t ,,E;�t.ic:>tK Ql.f►��G ;. � 7 / ��• `�`+ F ��"_�� ('•'z;V�Y�� �r Vif y� ✓/ �v t"� (i i��� �'f`J i�� I __ /Xi �' �,�i f II 2, - S Ja: 4 , x$ q� ., +._„ ., a :a. y„,h. .4, rc'•. m^:. ').... , , ,. .. .. ..: ,., ,M .._.._ .,:.. •:'. - ',tea"'_%-. � �� r� V L _ . ` h c a"�•' a - w LEG . , 5 -GALLON Pl41T iK • � -GA.LI.ON PLANT I� PbTEt�) Evutp N G LAB n! /' • PALM '�RE.E TAIWK HT.A6oTEp) I! e6IjERA PARViF�LWt i 1 0 ^wN) DRAWN — — EX 16T NG REE ZT (To WON) � CHECKED / i '• � ': DATE I , i SCALE JOS NO. -4A SHEET NORTH OR amenT8 PRINTED ON CLEARPRINT 1000H x 0 `' REVISIONS BY MaTG N U i tJ� 'a' II 1• k N. v w 00r, ts q 171 a A �ni .. c , - w c o � 0 _ .r oUc o • - _ O >' c°nca -' boo+ • w N m ~ A 0 ' � • ------ -- III. � � i i O • Q ---- - j r '• it y a �G' LAB ` '1'r+�►,i Q ---- � �-� Tau. ---- PaRvIrr, A A r w, x k e; ♦ _ LEGEND &7`"E"l, 15 GAL LO►J Pt,AN T i -- SOX Spez AEA I C51Z� A'6 Pb�t'ED) Q r C a __ 10 G 5 I JC F;p. f'JI.R Y;FGt.�A PALM ^G�i DRAWN vCB�r1N TRt�NK HT•PS NCfLdj ;=:;�,• �}(is ( CHECKED ',! x a.usTR^LA w �t.vwv -- - - -- -- - t NG 1►�EE to wN) 2q N�K►t� ol. f'NG 'SrsTE� Aar��S �/,1JI IWG 6H1�U� (To 1�� DATE SCALE . 4 I k�a _ SHEET , N0R'�I-� L - 4 SHEETS PRINTED AN CLEARPRINT 1000H bF ..,.... ... ...�.r.... ;. mess.. ,qr;, .>:+-_; ,;�•.�;. _,.miss ...- ,;.. z .,_ .. - --- - -... s .... .. k,-n ..N:e 66 i A�VIt•IOfV• ■r - x. IRRIGATION SPECIFICATIONS j - PIANtiMG 3PECIFICAlIUM9 I. SCOPE OF WORA: 1. SCOPE OF WORK: A. Provide all labor, materials, transportation, and maintenance required to furrtish and Install a Complete irrigation system A. General: this work shall consist Of performing finish grading; reed control; soil prepaystioni Plsntln7i and landscap0 I VAGVI.VM� ma►ntenanoml and shall Include furnishing Ill labor, materials, tools, equipment, and any other appurtensn,,e• necessary / 1%'fAhPiP. Ae�et,Y as shown on plans and described hereto. W t ,lY for the coePl•tlon Of th11 project. �.-r- ---s VA`AAS 6. The intent of these plans and specifications IS to provide a sprinkler system complete and operable in an efficient and 1. Chanye-g'-SuDstttutlons, and Extnq: Any extras, rev uton$, or substitutions to the work Shown On the Plans and specified satisfactory manner, providing Complete and even coverage. herein require written approval trot the Owner's Representative prior to installation, e I �1 1i1 ►ii 4 , C. The Contractor shall inspect the site and check all finish grades within the work area to Insure proper soil depth for the C. Verification 91 1111t_►_n9 Condttlons: Contractor shall verify all existing conditions, including Plants to re••in prior to 1 y u JIQ N _ Ll PIM 09. pipes, to check dimensions, and to verify the source and size of rater supply. starting work. Oti ae; R (,p(,AL Gp p� ,-1 �...� �p�� D. Coordination: All irrigation work shall be completed and approved by the Owner's Representative prior to eluting Plant* +_ 1_ I ,y�,_��pD�i_ �Ip�' ��/(� �j{,��j �1,pQ � { D. The Contractor shall pay for all required permits for this mark. my Wore I ' 'iili I� 110'f trls?AEU. ��TZPG'fl.Y a II. MATERIALS: cal - N tJI fI. MATERIALS: �IIi1 /�I LaN�, FiN�N GRA04, k available. O G � L h t their kind a 1 r h t • es lei 1 r<,t ale shall Ot best o A en•rel: All , e�1 Iry A. 6 lJ` A. All materials and equipment shall De of the type and size indicated on the plans unless permission to change is granted by -_--- the Owner's representative. Materials are to be in new and perfect Condition. All materials required but not specified on ! Plants: GNLY) bUNIU f TAf MAIM (,irl� -�/G G�,,A 315 r'�R 1e�rr<, Gold 'mild i=iI�I _� the plans shall be provided by the Contractor. "�n/�GlHee EV IQ FT, INSTAU. MFCZ� �• - �III� - I. All plants shall be healthy, vigorous and of normal growth, free of disease, insects, posts, Andlor tnmir eggs, and ✓Later I CRY ��" �' GO n their containers but not root bound. n n ore, root systems, well filling 1 n for- snail ,ve ealthy, normal Y 9 I'i 8. Plastic pipe and fittings snail De t00i virgin polyvinylchlorlde, well formed, tree of Dusters, cracks, notes, and o sign materials, wrinkles, and dents. 2. Plants shill not be pruned prior to delivery except as authorized in writing by the Owner's Representatlys. O�j� i C. Soil Amendment: shall be composted nitrogen-stabilized redwood or fir shavings. C. Control mire between remote control valves and controller snail be 1/ volt, solid cooper tire, nutoer 11 uF (Minimum -'�J49 ALL, P\1G 056 1 W � �10 . n on the Inns. -� n Preparation* and 'Maintenance' below and p Size), direct-burlal wire (UL-listed). Use white wire for Common, blue for lawn Systems, and black for shrub Systems. D. fertilizer{. shall De specified under 'Soil1 ze�e6 To AL LCW FO)Z E. Mulch: Shall be Kellogg'sG T1otiJ +~ III. INSTALLATION: wIN.-* L CONGRE(�•�IRl d. F. Iron sulfate. shall have A guaranteed analysis of 101 sulfur and tot iron (derived trot both ferric and ferrous Sulfate►. A. General: C. Commercial Fertilizer: shall be granular fertilizer (12-12-12). 1. Do not willfully install the irrigation system as shown on the plans when it is obvious that obstructions, grade Jiff- N. Soil Sulfur_: shall have guaranteed analysis of 99% sulfur. ,�j�! / / ( `�� /� p erences, or measurement discrepancies exist that may not have been considered in the design. Immediately report such N v N �•2 �i,t: I i�ri�� V A4 UL ` �eA K r�11 differences to the Owner's representative. In the event that this notification 13 not performed, the Irrigation Con- III. INSTALlAfiON: E tractor snail assume full responsibility for any revision necessary. A. General: Landscape Work shall be according to the workmanlike standards established for landscape construction and plant- f r , 2. Sprinkler plans are diagrammatic and approximate. All valves shall be located in planting areas. Mainlines and laterals ing. shall be placed in the Sall trench and in planting areas wherever possible. Provide minimum norizontil clearance of 1 1. Underground Obstructions: Contractor is responsible for verifying the locations of all utilities and other underground inches between parallel pipes• obstructions to prevent damage. Notify the Owner's Representative of any conflict between such obstructions and plant V 3. Where trees li ht oles etc., obstruct sprays, piping and sprinkler heads Shall De adjusted and/or relocated as nec- locations. ��/� ""- "sX 9 D r Gn essary for complete coverage. Do not exceed head-spicing shorn. ��'N��w ��R�E �S'1 tG V/�LVE �'JX +��LC�GK. AID /. All equipment shall De installed as detailed on the plans. If the plans or specifications do not thoroughly describe C. Finish Gredinq: the methods to be used, Contractor shall follow manufacturer's installation instructions. 1. All ,rims will be received by the Contractor At substantially within 0.1 foot of finish grade. nl 2. Grad• all lawn and p►anhnq areas to smooth, rsifore levels or slope withoutADruDt changes of surf,ct. Sstl arcs ' B. ExcawIlan 8ackfill• adJ,ant to buildings shall b• gradedto allot free floc of miter to drainm9e devices.3. Finish grade after adding soil amendment and settlement shall be one inch below curbs, headers, and P,yin9 10 lirarsas nd two inches below in lantin areas. utilities prior to trenclll 1. Verifyexact locations of 8114 Tf planting I F F�,G �' �Nf _ �r. r rto i"f f ter of the pipe provide _ '` t I _ h 2. Trenches shall be cut to the required grade to provide uniform support lit o l eiy p pf A D• reed Control: Contractor shall germinate and destroy existing weed seeds before preparing areas for planting. Sufficient / =~ ': over lateral lines and 18 Inches over mainlines, „ 1�y w ,�,� w - / "" 4 minimum coverage of 12 inches 0 e 1 water shall be applied to cause weed seeds to sprout. reeds shall De removed before they set seed. p� �+i t fine macular material with no foreign objects larger t an 1/2 inch. Tamp moist Dackfill to car J TD S��N �S 4 W < " 4' 3. Initial bickfill to be I e g 9 pact and conform to adjacent grades without sunken areas or other irregularities. E., soil Preparation: 1. Trenches under a.c. paving shall De Dackfilled with sand. 1. Cmltivate ail laws and planting areas to a depth of 6 inches. /impose of all �Wis and rocks over 3 inches 1m via. A,{ V/A' ,Ir _ ' I (.�V Vf'�ri _,l: � X f AN5 0 N (,p0� 5. 8ackfill shall be compacted to the same density as adjacent soil. If settlement occurs, Contactor snail make any in 2. soil aeehdeencs shall be (quantities per 1,00o sg.`ft.1: y�/N A AIDt.)N � AlI CL pipes, valves, heads, finish grades, or sod necessary at no extra cost. Y� 2 X 4 ��. aV A q r3� a cu. yds. soil amendment 15 Jos. 12-12-12 fertilizer f1 ,, IIri� �U N D -- - - - - - to C. Pipe: 20 lbs. soil sulfur r'V-�NI.�N�i Q ! , r rs� - - PVG SG I�. i5 �=' . ! �� r _ _ ► �U,Ff. . l�t2AUE L ; Q o c� ap� paving shall be installed and tested prior to paving work. No tees, - e 1. All piping, PVC electrical sleeves, etc., under p 9 3. Spread soil amendments evenly over all areas and till into top 1 inches of sail. �IP�LG -- -i"' _•,� 11 J 4 ells, or other turns in piping allowed under paving. Cap all ends hand-tight prior to backfill. -- E 2. All mainlines shall be capped and pressure-tested at 125 psi for 2 hours. Laterals shall be pressure-tested at system F. Shrum and Tree Planting: /riAl►Jt.Ifl� FI^�IN�t ___ i'. W N design pressure for one nour. Any leaks found shall be corrected by removing the leaking pipe or fittings and replacing with new materials, and then re-testing. All tests shall De observed and approved by Owners Representative and stall 1. Do not commence planting vntil all grading and irrigation work nave been completed. No planting shall be done Om t PILOT WI(� � � nn a extremely hoc, dry, windy or freezing days. be completed prior to backfillinq• 2. Relative positions of all plants is subJect to the approval to the Owner's Representative and may be relocated it 3. Wrap all galvanized pipe and fitting threads with teflon tape. Use pipe compound on PVC threads. his/her direction. h-�+ 3. Planting pits shall be dug trice the diameter of the container and 6 inches deeper than the rootball. 8ackfill fix CZ ^O� IN D. Backflow Preventer: Contractor small verify that backflow prevention devices) specified meets) local Plumbing 6 mealth • shall be as follows: 6 parts by volute rock free on-site soil \ / y code requirements. 4 parts by volume soil amendment ri YA LV� 1 lb. 12-12-12 fertilizer per cu. yd. of six � � E. Sprinkler Heads: 2 lb. iron sulfate per cu. yd° of six 1. Install all heads on double-swing joints. 4. All plants shall be set so that when settled they Dear the site relation to the finish grade as they bore to soil lev- 2. Prior to installing heads, all laterals shall be flushed out with a full head of miter. el before planting. fore an earth berm around each plant. t 3. Sprinkler heads are available in varying degrees of arcs. At each head, Contractor shall provide the are most suited to S. rater each plant immediately after planting. Apply rater in such a canner as to not disturb backfill and In such a quantity that all materials in hole are wet. provide adequate coverage and prevent overspray on walks, buildings, etc. 6. Trees 15-gallon and smaller shall be double-staked with 2-inch diameter lodgWlo stakes lOCAted At the 9090 of the 4. All sprinklers and valves shall be adjusted for complete coverage with minimum overthrow. Adjust all bubblers to rootball. All Dox trees shall be guyed with 3 mire-guys, equally spaced. Remove all nursery stakes and ties. FIND G�A -� � prevent excessive flooding. 7, Vines And espaliers shall be tied to supports as noted on plan using galvanized books and wires, and plastic ties. ,1 p A N RU13 SPRAY D(t S. Risers to sprinkler heads small be set perpendicular to finish grade. Shrub heads shall be installed on 12-lncn risers, 6. Sod Lawn: 0 I N�I4 4�`- risers. Gl�$ -� � 3Ut38L•6R NERD and bubblers on 6-inch cis oo.. 1. Sod shall be as specified on Plan and shall be instilled within 21 hours of harvesting. F. Controller: 2. Sod area shall be rolled lightly and mitered to a depth of 6 inches the day prior to installing sod. Fill or regrado -- any areas as necessary. Lightly miter again just prior to laying sod. i III I � n 2m For_I,AWO 1. I20-volt service and hookup to controller shall De provided by others. 3. Sod shall De laid to a staggered pattern, with tight joints and in the same direction each ties. On slopes, install a r-r`Y HGr'si� c i sod from the bottom up. Protect the newly laid sod by walking on boards as the installer moves upward. Sod on slopes _ 111 i�� r I N KH !�RAGS -T- (�' FOB. 5N RU b N EAl7 � , 2. Automatic controller shall be set plumb, shall De pinned down with wooden pegs. ,�, ,� �p 3, Bundle and tape wires every 10 feet. 1. Roll sod with adequately weighted roller to smooth out sad bed. �JIt� eD L g VALVG j2d �J 1fy'/4(,K G��B, GK klALl w - 4. Wire connections shall be made with Scotch-Lok Wire-Sealing Packs 13576, or approved equal. S. Keep sod thoroughly watered to a depth of 6 inches until established. No foot traffic should be allowed for 2 to 3 reeks After installation. IV. CLEAN-UP: Clean up site as each portion of work progresses. Refuse and excess dirt shall be removed from the site; all milks and paving shall be swept and any damage to others' work shall be repaired. IV. MISCELLANEOUS: - a A. Cleanup: Upon completion of all planting work and before final acceptance, Contractor shall relays all material And deb- ��A� Qom C )Ilx ! _•, Pc ,`� /1 V. INSPECTIONS AS-BUILTS CONTROLLER CHARTS, GUARANTEES: ris resulting from his work. Remove all tags, labels, nursery stakes, and ties from plants. All paved areas shall be F/'rT� `„^�'�1 LAW r -mar 109W H eAD V Lam+ A. All inspections Small be made by Owner's Representative, as follows: (Give 48-hour notice prior to inspection) swept clean and site left in a neat and acceptable condition as approved by Owner's Reprosantitive. a � P�IQAf�S N IPA �� 900 ALL 4441---..•---- � ..1 O p� ,(� \ 1, 1. Guarantees: Contractor shall guarantee all plants, 15-gallon and larger, for a period of one year. All other plants shall 5� r VG �If r e L i J 1. Open trenches. be guaranteed for a period of 90 days. Plants which die or lose more than 30% of their original leaves during this period ,�f� �fw .{� 2. Pressure tests. shall be replaced by the Contractor. Replacements shall be made within 7 days of written notification to Contractor. II+ I ( I r I.AI5AAo �PFi-7 r Z 6T>`LMT ELL 3. Coverage tests. C. Jesoections: The following inspections will be performed by the Owner's Representative (give 48 hours notice): Z 1. Contractor shall furnish to Owner a complete 'as-built' drawing on sepia showing exact locations of all items installed, 1. At completion of soil preparation and finish grading. _ dimensioned In two directions from permanent structures on site including the following items: 2. Plant materials after delivery to site but prior to planting. SIN LiN a II M 3. Plant locations prior to planting. x � 0i� go°STiMr �u- _ �-� q�• s �.� •u a. finish grading prior to lawn installation. ;, <� � ; �� 1. Gate YaIVlS. S. finish construction inspection prior to maintenance. - 2. Routingof all main lines. 6. Final acceptance it the and of the maintenance period. +r, t"" ' v 1,,, m :.�TG l,iNE F11'f1NLa t 3. Connections to existing rater lines ' er D. Maintenance: Al .;. / Routingof control wires. s� Jl .9 t -. .. :a5 ... ,.., ..: �.. :�,k „ - ..ice s..,. ._ .:. ,yi..c.x. ..... ..L.. -,.,_ .+",... , .. .�.r_„, i.,..,, ..-. � s� yr...... + V_ f S. Sprinkler control valves. I , ri f, 1. Entire project shall De smtistactorily maintained for a period of sixty l60),days prior after Fitiil �l. " a 1 ! Pop- �'� 2. Maintenance shall include mitering, reeding, fertilizing, irrigation system iajusueets, disease and pest eontrfl, I '� ��� / ��. � .�( LAWN I U P C. Upon completion and approval of the irrigation as-built, the Irrigation Contractor shall complete the controller chart. toging ,red Swing lawn, and 5ererally performing plant care and establishment sort. �J _ 3. 30 days after planting, fertilize all planting areas with 16-6-e commercial fertilizer it the rate of 6 Jos. Per 1,000 1. The approved is-Dullt Shall be utilized as the chart and reduced (photocopy reduction) for placement of controller SCuar1 G•c IaDDIy per manututur•r's instructions c chart Into controller door. v callout and the area wnich It Covers with a different E. Certification: Prior to final acceptance, written certifications shall De submitted to Crner's Representative for the 04 2. When reduction Is prepared, color each remote control vale LP pastel Color. follorin9: 3. Forward controller chart to Landscape Architect for approval. 1. Quantities of soil Amendments and fertilizers. e 4. Upon approval, hermetically seal the approved controller chart between two pieces of 20 oil. thick plastic. 2. Quantities by species And size of all plant materials. S. Submit completed controller Chart to Landscape Architect for approval. Roy. 1/3/ea 6. Place approved controller chart inside automatic controller door. err' o v � I D. Contractor shalt guarantee irrigation system for one year against defective equipment, installation deficiency, and all _ period Shall cosmetics on date of ftnal acceptance of the Pork. Any problems not related to vandalism. Gwrantse p 2 x¢ RW� H�R ;n operltianal difficulties wnich, in the opinion of the Owner's Representative, are due to interior materials ono/or cork- r!G1� �R�� - 2 2"� LoGZ'aE 1�7LE P►tJ E unship, snail be immediately corrected by the Contractor at no additional cost to owner, LAVV�I GRAD E RF.L '3fAKro4 w/1aD END a E. Contractor shalt Instruct the Owner or nis/her Representative in the operation and maintenance of the system. _ yLLrf11 ! + 4 WIRE � N09b Ir�iG �eJ Oa7AWfV �"1- - _ i.s'(A KFf� To 6 Es 00 TA L1.E ft -1 1 VII. MAINTENANCE: Complete system shall be maintained 60 days after completion of planting. System shall be flushed and automatic _ IN F�tU KE '®w Ff►5 NiOf�J A KLU11 p • _ '' j(;II=.11�-= �"rINJ NEriGLo D T� RbTUK1J y"� controller reset at completion of maintenance period. I TEE, C N E C K E O IIIII_ W Tc UPRIGHT Pas111o►� V �T� I✓CrND1WA, _ _ IL OAT■ 2 GALY, NWIt� I 2x 2 x I$ RwD, 51 2, Pt.A<,E 5TLK6h sot �, Ilinlul -- I ' 4 ' 3D"D,G, rPtVA1LI%Jd W140 ibVFh r= '� ' '$ I►J5pJ,1. �S(AK�1S Q EtxE � SCALE T. w of" RO�o'TpALL 2 NTO �lL iIIJ1 A-t ToP •� �twE!!4 4 4 oT `Vt I ,I c _ r 1 BOLOw "IW 4 MDLE, JO■ NO. f� I �� T �fJ �Iil 'j 0o-M INsvt,L N �:/'�{Tia�. •NEE T LAWN MP-ETS 5HRU� ;�EpW00P H E,40512 MTA I L /srt_r o" TR5 E 5rA4 ICI DE.-1phi L - 15.6i�,,tTRF.�s �o !!k-AL F Ole PRINTED ON CLEARPHINr 1000H v „ r, z , « I I , QJ• ' •Y j CCD wA 04 sA. I Ir A E 4 I ' , i s . A - y -V1: - .. �� r �x �• `r <+,ro t u A x > r� . p M i , r a } SOtnH EtAl ErMO• 4 sca co Q ' 17" 7 71F 0!�w IT r j 0 M f r.1 f Y ' r t - _ sc ^ c , H> E N° n F v a n „ y, , 4 w�, 3 � t t s� �y k'' , i'. m ;rs t o , e k k . � 1 r ~ 7;r 4 ? t ,71, I >, , r , , t i - Biwa - - - - tw p s , r " F { y , , r „ } 3 .« R I `l.J r•� r + a^ , , E I • A. ' O k a x t. I II' 4 { r - NOW monk- : NO T H" ELEVA'`t �: ,P 1111i n, • f Lt— KlakO .,t�L w ' � ! � it "„ • ,w3 � � - - r � t is l f , I I