Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPP 84-44 APARTMENTS/SANTA ROSA WAY 1984.PRECBE PLANS ;` ZONE CHANGE VARIANCE U.l. ,R __ REFER, 1-0. TENTATIVE TRACT - PARCEL tv9AI-__ y APPLICANT: LOCATION: i+/. rlbef ,,f Pa s,A A'Ve5 a e.� REQUEST _—_ EXISTING ZONE: — PREPARATION PROGRESS DATE BY COMMENTS APPLICATION RECEIVED q78 �y �✓ LEGAL PUBLICATION SENT" NOTICES SENT FIELD INVESTIGATION DEPTS.TNOTIFIED BUILDING /°./ ENGINEERING FIRE 4 POLICE RECREATION & PARKS SCHOOL DISTRICT DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS FLOOD CONTROL PREI-IMINARY MEETING -_-_ / C v Sq-LAU � STAFF DEPORT FINAL PLAN APPROVAL PRECISE PLAN (6) LANDSCAPING PLAN (5) PLAN. DIRECTOR. MOD. (6) DATE ACTION VOTE _ REVIEW BOARD HEARING PC. HEARING PUBLISHED PC. PUBLIC HEARING APPLICANT NOTIFIED C.C. PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE NO. RESOLUTION NO. EFFECTIVE DATE RECORDED FOR DATA -BANK ZONING MAP CORRECTED MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION NOVEMBER 20, 1984 D. Case Nos. PP 84-44 and PMW 84-16 - WILLIAM SPENCER, Applicant Request for approval of a precise plan of design, negative declaration of environmental impact, and parcel map waiver to consolidate the site into one lot to allow construction of an eight unit apartment project (utilizing 25% density bonus allowed by state law) in the R-2 zone located on the north side of Santa Rosa Way, 200 feet west of San Pascual. Mr. Diaz reviewed the salient points of the staff report. Chairman Crites opened the public testimony and asked the applicant to address the commission. MR. BILL SPENCER, Palm Desert, explained his proposal. Chairman Crites asked if anyone present wished to speak in FAVOR or OPPOSITION to this project. Hearing none, Chairman Crites closed the public testimony. Action: Moved by Commissioner Downs, seconded by Commissioner Wood, to approve the findings as presented by staff. Carried 3-0-1 (Commissioner Richards abstained.) Moved by Commissioner Downs, seconded by Commissioner Wood, to adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 1010, approving PP 84-44 and PMW 84-16. Carried 3-0-1 (Commissioner Richards abstained.) E. Case No. PP 84-45 - COACHELLA VALLEY TV, Applicant Request for approval of a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact and a precise plan of design to allow construction of a 20,650 square foot industrial/administration building on 2.92 acres in the S.I./S.P. (service industrial district with a scenic preservation overlay) zone located on the west side of Cook Street, approximately 650 feet north of 42nd Street. Mr. Diaz explained the staff report and recommended approval. Chairman Crites opened the public testimony and asked the applicant to address the commission. MR. JOHN OUTCAULT, architect, asked for and received clarification on several conditions. Chairman Crites asked if anyone present wished to speak in FAVOR or OPPOSITION to this project. Hearing none, the public testimony was closed. Action: Moved by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner Downs, to approve the findings as presented by staff. Carried 4-0. Moved by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner Downs, to adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 1011, approving PP 84-45, subject to conditions. Carried 4-0. Vill. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS A. PP 84-20, FRANK GOODMAN, Applicant Request for review of the development agreement for property located on the north side of Candlewood, 150 feet east of Portola Avenue. -5- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1010 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PRECISE PLAN OF DESIGN, PARCEL MAP WAIVER AND A NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT AND RECOMMENDING APPROVAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A 8 UNIT APARTMENT PROJECT ON THE NORTH SIDE OF SANTA ROSA WAY 300 FEET WEST OF SAN PASCUAL. CASE NO'S. ( 84-44 and PMW 84-16 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, Calif- ornia, did on the 20th day of November, 1984, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider a request by WILLIAM SPENCER for approval of a precise plan of design, parcel map waiver, negative declaration of environmental impact, and development agreement to allow construction of a 8 unit apartment complex on a 26,476 square foot site on the north side of Santa Rosa Way, 300 feet west of San Pascual. WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedures for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 80-89", in that the director of environmental services has determined that the project will not have a negative impact on the environ- ment and a negative declaration has been prepared. WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said commission did find the following facts and reasons to exist to justify its actions: 1. The design of the precise plan will not substantially depreciate property values in the vicinity. 2. The precise plan will not unreasonably interfere with the use or enjoy- ment of property in the vicinity by the occupants thereof for lawful purposes. 3. The precise plan will not endanger the public peace, health, safety, or general welfare. 4. That the proposed waiver to consolidate two lots into one lot and that resulting parcel complies with applicable requirements as to area, im- provement and design, floodwater drainage control, appropriate improved public roads, sanitary disposal facilities, water supply availability, envir- onmental protection, and other requirements of the municipal code. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the commission in this case. 2. That approval of Precise Plan 84-44 is hereby granted for reasons subject to the attached conditions. 3. That approval of PMW 84-16 is hereby granted. 4. That a negative declaration of environmental impact is hereby approved subject to implementation of the attached conditions. 5. Approval of the Spencer Development Agreement, Exhibit "C" is reco- mmended to the city council. PLANNING RESOLUTION NO. 1010 PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 20th day of November, 1984, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: DOWNS, WOOD & CRITES NOES: NONE ABSENT: ERWOOD ABSTAIN: RICHARDS J 0 BUFO CRITES, Chairman ATTEST: Lwr�- RAMON A. DIAZ, Secr ry Jdlg PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1010 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PP 84-44 and PMW 84-16 Department of Environmental Services: 1. This approval is contingent upon final adoption of the proposed Housing Element to the Palm Desert General Plan, GP A 84-01 and execution of a development agreement. 2. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for construction of any uses con- templated by this approval, the applicant shall first complete all the proce- dural requirements for the city which include, but are not limited to, design review and buidling permits. 3. The development of the property shall conform with all approved exhibits on file with the department of environmental services and to all municipal, state, and federal statutes now in force or which hereafter may be in force. 4. Construction of a portion of said project shall commence within one year from the date of final approval unless a time extension is granted, otherwise said approval shall become null, void and of no effect whatsoever. 5. Prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contem- plated by this approval, the applicant shall first obtain permits and/or clear- ance from the following agencies: Riverside County Department of Health Palm Desert Architectural Commission City Fire Marshal Coachella Valley Water District Palm Desert Water Services District 6. Provisions for mail service shall be coordinated with the Palm Desert Branch, U.S. Postal Service. 7. Location and design of trash enclosures shall be coordinated with Palm Desert Disposal Company. 8. That the owner (developer) prior to issuance of building permit, provide evidence to the city that he has paid school mitigation fee ($628/unit) to the Desert Sands Unified School District. 9. All existing electrical distribution lines, telephone, cable antenna television, and similar wires or cables which are on or adjacent to the property being developed shall be installed underground, if practible as a part of develop- ment from the nearest existing pole not on the property being developed. Department of Public Works: 1. Drainage and signalization fund fees, as required by city ordinance, shall be paid prior to building permit issuance. 2. Drainage facilities shall be provided, per Ordinance No. 218 and the Master Drainage Plan, to the specifications of the director of public works. 3. Storm drain construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study by the private engineer that is approved by the department of public works. 4. Full public improvements, including traffic safety lighting, as required by ordinance and the director of public works, shall be installed in accordance with city standards. 5. Complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the city engineer for checking and approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. The engineer shall submit "as -built" plans prior to the acceptance of the improvements by the city. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1010 Department of Public Works (Continued): 6. Landscaping maintenance on Santa Rosa Way shall be provided by the property owner. 7. Complete grading plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the city engineer for checking and approval prior to issuance of any permits. 8. Dedication of 5 feet of right-of-way on Santa Rosa Way shall be done prior to issuance of any permits and approval of plans. 9. Installation of curb and gutter, matching paving and sidewalk on Santa Rosa. 10. Offsite improvement plans to be approved by public works department and a surety posted to guarantee offsite improvements prior to building permit issuance. 11. Size, number and location of driveways to public works specifications with only one driveway approach to be allowed to serve this property. 12. Parcel map waiver to be recorded prior to the grading permit issuance. City Fire Marshal: 1. Install a water system capable of delivering 2500 GPM fire flow from any fire hydrant for a 2 hour duration in addition to domestic supply. The compu- tation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement. Fire flow requirements will depend on built-in fire protection provisions of buildings., 2. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants so that no point of any building is more than 250 feet from a fire hydrant measured along approved vehicular travel ways. a. Exterior surface of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow, and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. b. Curbs shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. c. Hydrants shall not be located closer than 25 feet to any building. 3. The Water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and approved by the water company with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system in PP 84-44, PMW 84-16 is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Fire Marshal." 4. Prior to delivery of combustible materials to the building site, the required water system shall be installed, operating and delivering the required flow. 5. Wrought iron gate on south elevation to have gates for emergency access. 6. Fire lanes will,' be required. 7. Additional fire protection requirements may be necessary when the applicant submits specific plans for consideration and approval. Palm Desert Water do Services District: 1. Frontage fee of $12.00 per foot will be imposed along Santa Rosa Way. 2. The district will install a li inch water meter at the cost of $1,150. 3. The water service installation chares will be as follows: One 1; inch water meter @ $1,150./each $1,150. Frontage fee of 172 feet @ 2,064/foot 2,064. TOTAL $3,214. Palm Desert Water & Services District (Continued): 4. All fees and other charges must be paid before the installation work will begin. 5. At least one week advance notice should be given. 6. There is an existing fire hydrant on the project site between Lot 5 and Lot 12. The addition of any new fire hydrants or relocation of any existing, if required by the City Fire Marshal would be completed at the owner's expense. The cost of any hydrant improvements would be furnished by the District upon request. 7. A fire sprinkler service connections if fire sprinklers are required by the City Fire Marshal, would be completed at an additional charge and conditions to be determined upon request and according to the district's standards. 8. The district owns and maintains, a 4 inch steel water main which is located on the lot line between Lot 5 and Lot 12. Before the district can give approval more detailed building plans (ie: footing and other foundation plans) will have to be submitted to the district along with a copy of the preliminary title report for the property. The owner will have to make additional improve- ments to the water main to protect it during and after construction. The extent of those improvements will be determined upon receipt of the information requested above. 9. The owner will also sign an agreement with the district releasing the district from responsibility for the removal of improvements hould maintenance or repair on the 4 inch water main be necessary in the future. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1010 EXHIBIT "A" WILLIAM SPENCER AFFORDABLE HOUSINGAGREEMENT This agreement, made as of this _ day of , 1984, between the City of Palm Desert, a California municipal corporation (hereinafter "CITY") and William Spencer, (hereinafter "DEVELOPER") provides: RECITALS 1. DEVELOPER is owner of certain real property located within the City of Palm Desert, California, which property is described in Exhibit 1, attached hereto and made a part hereof (hereinafter "PROPERTY"). DEVELOPER has applied for and been granted a precise plan (PP 84-44) to construct 8 residential rental units on the PROPERTY. 2. As a condition of said approvals, CITY has required that a specified number of units within Precise Plan 84-44 (hereinafter "PROJECT") be set aside for mpderate income occupants subject to restrictions necessary to insure the continued occupancy of said units -by moderate income households. 3. DEVELOPER and CITY desire to further memorialize and implement the conditions of said approval and do hereby agree to the following terms and conditions. AGREEMENT 1. DEVELOPER has been conditionally granted permission by the CITY to construct a total of 8 rental residential units on the PROPERTY by Precise Plan 84-44 and Planning Commission Resolution No. . Asa condition of said approvals DEVELOPER is required, and hereby agrees to reserve for rent 2 units for moderate income households. Hereinafter these 2 units shall be referred to as "AFFORDABLE UNITS". These AFFORDABLE UNITS shall consist of two (2) two bedroom two bath units. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1010 2. As used herein, "moderate income households" shall refer to families or individuals whose gross income does not exceed the Riverside County median income based upon financial and demographic information received from the United States Department of Housing and Community Development (HUD) or its successor agency. This information is contained in "Exhibit 2" and shall be updated automatically as information is obtained from HUD. If in the future more relevant data is made available by other officially recognized agencies, the applicant may request amendment of this agreement to include such data. 3. Rent for AFFORDABLE UNITS shall not exceed 30% of the gross income of moderate income households. The maximum rent for the two (2) two bedroom, two bath units 'shall be based on income figures for 3 person house- holds, resulting in the following maximum initial rents These rents shall be adjusted per Article 2 of this agreement. 2 - 2 bedroom, 2 bath $564 4. The DEVELOPER or his assigned management agent shall be responsible for determining elgibility of prospective tenants. Prior to opening the project the DEVELOPER shall submit for approval a plan to the CITY describing the procedure for determining and enforcing eligibility requirements. This plan shall include annual qualification by all eligible households and a semi- annual audit gat the DEVELOPER'S cost by the ,CITY or its assigned agents determining compliance with all aspects of this agreement. 5. The DEVELOPER shall not discriminate on the basis of race, creed, sex, national origin, or age. The AFFORDABLE UNITS shall be equipped in the same fashion and their exterior shall be identical in quality and desirability as other units in the project. The AFFORDABLE UNITS shall be evenly dispersed throughout the project. The exact location of the AFFORDABLE UNITS shall be changed from time to time as vacancies permit. 6. The DEVELOPER shall maintain the quality of the buildings, ground and recreation facilities consistent with their condition at the time of issuance of certificate of occupancy. The DEVELOPER shall post a $2,500 bond or other satisfactory security assuring the performance of any work the CITY feels is necessary to meetithis requirement in a form satisfactory to the CITY. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1010 7. The term of this agreement shall run for thirty years during which period 2 aforementioned AFFORDABLE UNITS shall be reserved for moderate income households. This agreement has been prepared based on the premise that the PROJECT would be operated as rental housing. 8. the provisions of this agreement shall run with, burden and bind the DEVELOPER and his successors. The provisions hereof shall be enforceable by appropriate legal action brought by the CITY. In the events legal action is brought to enforce any provision hereof, the prevailing party shall be intitled to reasonable attorney's fees together with other legally allowable costs. 9. his agreement shall be reviewed by the CITY planning commission every 6 months, at which time the applicant or his successor shall be required to demonstrate good faith compliance with the terms of the agreement. If as a result of this review, the commission finds and determines, on the basis of substantial evidence, that the applicant has not complied in good faith with terms or conditions of the agreement, it shall recommend to the city council that the agreement be modified or terminated. If the city council concurs with the planning commission recommendation the agreement shall be modified or terminated. Proceeding before the city council shall be a noticed public hearing. If at the time of the hearings substantial improvements have not yet occurred on the site, termination of the AGREEMENT will also involve revocation of all previous approvals and permits associated herewith and the zoning of the property shall revert to the base R-2. If substantial improvements are already,in place and modifications acceptable to the CITY cannot be negotiated, then enforcement of provisions of this agreement shall be pursued through legal action per No. 8 of this AGREEMENT. 10. The AGREEMENT shall be construed according to the laws of the State of California. If any portion of the AGREEMENT is for any reason held to be unenforceable, such determination shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions. 11. Each of the parties hereto covenants and agrees that it has the legal capacity to malfe the AGREEMENTS herein contained, that each AGREEMENT is binding upon that party and that this AGREEMENT is executed by a duly authorized official acting in his offical capacity. PLANNING COMMISSION REOSLUTION NO. 1010 IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have executed this Agreement the year and date first above written. THE CITY OF PALM DESERT By By DEVELOPER By WILLIAM SPENCER (Notarized) ATTEST: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1010 EXHIBIT "I" Property Description Lots 12 and 5 Palma Village Garden, Tract 2 M.B. 022/050 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1010 EXHIBIT 112" Income Limits Median Family Income Persons in the FamEX Riverside/San Bernardino Counties 3 Definition: Moderate Income: $22,562 Households with incomes above 80% of the Median Family Income for the number of persons in the family, but below the median delineated above. CITY OF PALM DESERT STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission DATE: November 20, 1984 CASE NO: P/ 84-44-and PMW 84-16 REQUEST: �A. pppro�val of a precise plan of design, negative declaration of environmental impact, and parcel map waiver to consolidate the site into one lot to allow construction of a 8 unit apartment project (utilizing 25% density bonus allowed by state law) in the R-2 zone located on the north side of Santa Rosa Way 200 feet west of San Pascual. APPLICANT: William Spencer P.O. Box 144 Palm Desert, CA 92261 I. BACKGROUND: A. DESCRIPTION OF SITE: The property is a flat, 26,476 square foot rectangular shaped site. Above ground power lines exist along the north side of the site. Along the south property line around the developed site is a cedar board fence. B. ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE: North: R-2/Vacant South: R-2/Apartments East: R-2/single family dwelling West: R-2/Apartments C. GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION: Medium density residential, 5-7 d.u./acre D. PR03ECT DESCRIPTION: A. (GENERAL The project consists of 8 two bedroom apartment units provided in two buildings utilizing one story structures. Each of the units will be 936 square feet. The R-2 zone allows one unit for every 4,000 square feet of lot area. The three buildings will be located in 2 rows perpendicular to Santa Rosa. A 25 foot driveway provides access to parking located at the west end of the property. B. DENSITY: As stated previously, the R-2 zoning permits one unit for every 4,000 square feet. For this 26,476 square foot lot, 6 units would be permitted. Chapter 4.3 of the State Planning Law (California Code No. 65915) states that should a developer provide at least 25% of the units within a housing project affordable to low or moderate income households, the city shall grant a density bonus or increase of at least 25% over the number of units allowed by the zoning. If the city does not grant the increased density, then it must provide equivalent financial incentives. PP 84-44 and PMW 84-16 Continued November 20, 1984 in this case the density bonus would increase the permitted number of units to 8 units. The additional two units will have to be affordable . to moderate income households (three person households) earning less than $22,562. Maximum rent for these three units initially will be $564.00 per month. A development agreement (draft copy attached) will have to be approved by the city council prior to issuance of any building permits. The increased density will not result in significant negative traffic or aesthetic impacts. C. PARKING: Code requires that a total of at least 16 parking spaces be provided for an 8 unit apartment complex of which at least 8 must be covered. The project provides 16 parking spaces (8 covered and 8 open). The parking as proposed is consistent with the code provisions. D. ARCHITECTURE/DESIGN: More -complete architectural. plans will be reviewed -and must be approved. by the architectural commission. III. ANALYSIS: A. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL OF PRECISE PLAN: 1. The design of the precise plan will not substantially depreciate property values in the vicinity. Response: The precise plan as approved will comply with code requirements; architectural plans must be approved by the architectural commission and the project will be the first new development in the area in some time. The project whould not substantially depreciate property values in the vicinity. 2. The precise plan will not unreasonably interfere with the use of and enjoyment of property in the vicinity by the occupants thereof for lawful purposes. Response: the surrounding land in the vicinity is zoned for the same type of use as proposed, and owners would not be deprived the use of their land. 3. The precise plan will not endanger the public peach, health, safety, or general welfare. Response: The precise plan will comply with all code. requirements and must receive architectural commission approval and will not be detrimental to the public peach, health, safety, or general welfare. The plan as submitted complies with code. Commission should review the precise plan and determine its adequacy relative to the required f indings. B. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL OF PARCEL MAP WAIVER: The required findings for approval are that the proposed waiver and the resulting parcels comply with applicable requirements as to area, improvement and design, floodwater drainage control, appropriate improved public roads, sanitary disposal facilities, water supply avail- ability, environmental protection, and other requirements of the municipal code. These findings can be justified because the project complies with applicable city ordinances and can be serviced adequately by the utilities. PP 84-44 and PMW 84-16 Continued November 20, 1984 C. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The director of environmental services has determined that the proposed project will not have an adverse environmental impact on the environment and a negative declaration of environmental impact has been prepared. IV. RECOMMENDATION: The plan as submitted complies with code. Should commission wish to approve the propsed precise plan, parcel map waiver, and negative declaration of environmental impact, the appropriate action would be: a. Adoption of the findings. b. Adoption of Resolution No. approving PP 84-44 and PMW 84-16. V. ATTACHMENTS: a. Draft Resolution b.. Legal Notice c. Draft Development Agreement d. Comments from city departments and agencies e. Plans and Exhibits (draft development agreement) Prepared by: Reviewed and approved by: r PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PRECISE PLAN OF DESIGN, PARCEL MAP WAIVER AND A NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT AND RECOMMENDING APPROVAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A 8 UNIT APARTMENT PROJECT ON THE NORTH SIDE OF SANTA ROSA WAY 300 FEET WEST OF SAN PASCUAL. CASE NO'S. PP 84-44 and PMW 84-16 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 20th day of November, 1984, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider a request by. WILLIAM SPENCER for approval of a precise plan of design, parcel map waiver, negative declaration of.environmental impact,.. and development agreement to allow construction of a 8 unit apartment complex on a 26,476 square foot site on the north side of Santa Rosa Way, 300 feet west of San Pascual. WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedures for Implementation of the California Evnironmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 80-8911, in that the director. of environmental services has determined that the project will not have a negative impact on the environment and a negative declaration has been prepared. WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said commission did find the following facts and reasons to exist to justify its actions: 1. The design of the precise plan will not substantially depreciate property values in the vicinity. 2. The precise plan will not unreasonably interfere with the use or enjoyment of property in the vicinity by the occupants thereof for lawful purposes. 3. The precise plan will not endanger the public peace, health, safety, or general welfare. 4. That the proposed waiver to consolidate two lots into one lot and that resulting parcel complies with applicable requirements as to area, imp- rovement and design, floodwater drainage control, appropriate improved public roads, sanitary disposal facilities, water supply availability, environmental protection, and other requirements of the municipal code. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, california, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the commission in this case. 2. That approval of Precise Plan 84-44 is hereby granted for reasons subject to the attached conditions. 3. That approval of PMW 84-16 is hereby granted. 4. That a negative declaration of environmental impact is hereby approved subject to implementation of the attached conditions. 5. Approval of the Williams Development Agreement, Exhibit "C" is recommended to the city council. PLANNING RESOLUTION NO. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 20th day of November, 1984, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: BUFORD CRITES, Chairman ATTEST: RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PP 84-44 and PMW 84-16 DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES: 1. This approval is contingent upon final adoption of the proposed Housing Element to the Palm Desert General Plan, GPA 84-01 and execution of a development agreement. 2. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for construction of any uses con- templated by this approval, the applicant shall first complete all the proce- dural requirements for the city which include, but are not limited to, design review and building permits. 3. The development of the property shall conform with all approved exhibits on file with the Department of Environmental Services and to all municipal, state, and federal statutes now in force or which here after may be in force. 4. Construction of a portion of said project shall commence within one year from the date of final approval unless a time extension is granted, otherwise said approval shall become null, void and of no effect whatsoever. 5. Prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contem- plated by this approval, the applicant shall first obtain permits and/or clearance from the following agencies: Riverside County Department of Health Palm Desert Architectural Commission City Fire Marshal Coachella Valley Water District Palm Desert Water Services District 6. Provisions for mail service shall be coordinated with the Palm Desert Branch, U.S. Postal Service. 7. Location and design of trash enclosures shall be coordinated with Palm Desert Disposal Company. S. That the owner (developer) prior to issuance of building permit, provide evidence to the city that he has paid school mitigation fee ($628/unit) to the Desert Sands Unified School District. 9. All existing electrical distribution lines, telephone, cable antenna television, and similar wires or cables which are on or adjacent to the property being developed shall be installed underground, if practible as a part of development from the nearest existing pole not on the property being developed. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS: 1. Drainage and signalization fund fees, as required by city ordinance, shall be paid prior to building permit issuance. 2. Drainage facilities shall be provided, per Ordinance No. 218 and the Master Drainage Plan, to the specifications of the director of public works. 3. Storm drain construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study by the private engineer that is approved by the department of public works. 4. Full public improvements, including traffic safety lighting, as required by ordinance and the director of public works, shall be installed in accordance with city standards. 5. Complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the city engineer for checking and approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. The engineer shall submit "as -built" plans prior to the acceptance of the improvements by the city. PP 84-44 and PMW 84-16 (continued) DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS (Continued) 6. Landscaping maintenance on Santa Rosa Way shall be provided by the property owner. 7. Complete grading plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the city engineer for checking and approval prior to issuance of any permits. 8. Dedication of 5 feet of right-of-way on Santa Rosa Way shall be done prior to issuance of any permits and approval of plans. 9. Installation of curb and gutter, matching paving and sidewalk on Santa Rosa. 10. Offiite improvement plans to be approved by public works department and a surety posted to guarantee offsite improvements prior to building permit issuance. 11. Size, number and location of driveways to public works specification with only. one driveway approach to be allowed.to serve this property. 13._ Parcel. map waiver to be recorded prior to the grading permit issuance. CITY FIRE MARSHAL: 1. Install a water system capable of delivering 2500 GPM fire flow from any fire hydrant for a 2 hour duration in addition to domestic supply. The com- putation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measure- ment. Fire flow requirements will depend on built-in fire protection provisions of buildings. 2. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants so that no point of any building is more than 250 feet from a fire hydrant measured along approved vehicular travel ways. a. Exterior surface of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow, and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. b. Curbs shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. c. Hydrants shall not be located closer than 25 feet to any building. 3. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and approved . by the water company with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system in PP 84-44, PMW 84-16 is in accordance With the requirements prescribed by the Fire Marshal." 4. Prior to delivery of combustible materials to the building site, the required water system shall be installed, operating and delivering the required flow. 5. Wrought iron gate on south elevation to have gates fortemergency access. 6. Fire lanes will be required. 7. Additional fire protection requirements may be necessary when the applicant submits specific plans for consideration and approval. PALM DESERT WATER & SERVICES' DISTRICT: 1. Frontage fee of $12.00 per foot will be imposed along Santa Rosa Way. 2. The district will install a 1; inch water meter at the cost of $19150. 3. The water service installation charges will be as follows: One 1} inch water meter @ $1,150/each $1,150. Frontage fee of 172 feet @ 2,064/foot 2,064. TOTAL $3,214. 4. All fees and other charges must be paid before the installation work will begin. PP 84-44 and!PMW 84-16 (Continued) PALM DESERT WATER do SERVICES DISTRICT (Continued) 5. At least one week advance notice should be given. 6. There is an existing fire hydrant on the project site between Lot 5 and Lot 12. The addition of any new fire hydrants or relocation of any existing, if required by the City Fire Marshal would be completed at the owner's expense. The cost of any hydrant improvements would be furnished by the District upon request. 7. A fire sprinkler service connection, if fire sprinklers are required by the City Fire Marshal, would be completed at an additional charge and conditions to be determined upon request and according to the district's standards. 8. The district owns and maintains a 4 inch steel water main which is. located on the lot line between Lot 5 and Lot 12. Before the district can give approval more detailed building plans (i.e. footing and other foundation plans) will have to be submitted to the district along with a copy of the preliminary title report for the property. The owner will have to make additional improvements to the water main to protect it -during and after construction.. The extent of those improvements will be determined upon receipt of the information requested above. 9. The owner will also sign an agreement with the district releasing the district from responsibility for the removal of improvements should maintenance or repaie on the 4 inch water main be necessary in the future. LEGE October 26, 1984 CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE Case Nos. PP 84-44 and PMW 84-16 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by WILLIAM SPENCER for_ approval of a precise plan of design to allow construction of an eight (8) unit apartment complex and a parcel map waiver to consolidate the existing two (2) lots into one lot for the R-2 zoned property located on the north side of Santa Rosa Way, 300 feet west of San Pascual Avenue, also described as: APN 627-101-026 and 027 SAID Public Hearing will be held on Tuesday, November 20, 1984, at 2:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber at the Palm Desert Civic Center, 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. PUBLISH: Desert Post November 9, 1984 RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary Palm Desert. Planning Commission AM (M9$1100P ®—ap n0MM=M6 =)apses®='�b 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 NEGATIVE DECLARATION (Pursuant to Title 14, Division 6, Article 7, Section 15083, of the California Administrative Code) Common Project Case No: PP 84-44 and PMW 84-16 Name (if any) Spencer Apartment Complex_ Applicant/Project Sponsor: William Spencer, P.O. Box 1449 Palm Desert, CA 92261 Project Description/Location: construction of eilOt (8) apartment units on a 26,476 _ square foot lot. The Director .of the Department of Environmental Services, City of Palm Desert, California, has found that the described project will' not have a significant effect on the environment. A copy of the initial study has been attached to document the -reasons in support of this finding. Mitigation measures, if any, included in the project to avoid potentially significant effects, may also be found attached. RAMON A. DIAZ DATE Director of Environmental Services CASE NO. P & C� i t, .y c--� t ■-� � a. ti r.a,a I♦tr� c- ti f-� r • t . ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DEPT. INITIAL STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION CHECKLIST NOTE: The availability of data necessary to address the topics listed below shall forty the basis of a decision as to whether the application is considered complete for purposes of environmental assessment. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers, possible.mitigation measures and comments are provided on attached sheets). Yes Maybe No 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: , a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction, or overcovering of the soil? c. Change in topography or ground surface relief / features? V d. The destruction, covering, or modification — of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of ✓ soils, either on or off the site? 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? — — b. The creation of objectionable odors? c. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? _ _ 2, Yes Maybe No 3'. Water. Will the proposal result in: a.. .Changes in currents,`or the course or / 1` direction of water'movements? V b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? c. Alterations to the.course or flow of flood waters? d. Alteration of.the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? e. Change in the quantity.of ground waters, either through direct additions or with- drawals, or through interception of an / aquifer by cuts or excavations? _ _ ✓ f. Reduction in the amount of water other- wise -available for public water supplies? 4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of plants. (including trees, shrubs, grass, and crops)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or endangered species of plants? ✓ c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal / replenishment of existing species? S. Animal. Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, or insects)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or endangered species of animals? c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier.to the migration or movement of animals? 3. Yes M�be .. No 6. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in�.the rate of use of any natural / resources? - L/ r b. Depletion ofeany non-renewable natural — — — ;/ resource? 1/ 7. Energy. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? b. Demand upon existing sources of energy, or re- quire the.deaelopment of new sources of energy? S. Risk of Upset tiDoes the proposal involve a rTS_k_­6T an explosion or the release of ' hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, pesticides, oil, chemicals, or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? 9. Economic Loss. Will the proposal result in: a a. A change in the value of property and improvements endangered by flooding? b. A change in the value of property.and improaementsrexposed to geologic hazards / beyond accepted cornnunity risk standards? 10. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing 'noise levels toethe point at which accepted co,nmunity noise and vibration levels are exceeded? i 11. Land Use. Willethe proposal result in the alteration of the present developed or / planned land use of an area? 12. 'Open Space. Will the proposal lead t0 a decrease in the ;amount of designated open / space? 13. Population. Will the proposal result in: a. Alterat•ien 0 the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human / population of -the City? b. Change in the population distribution by age, income,72•eligion, racial, or ethnic / group, occupational class, household type? �/ 4. Yes Maybe. No 14. Emoloymen_t. Will the proposal result in additional new long-term jobs provided,'or a change in the number and per cent employed, unemployed, and underemployed? 15. Housing. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in number and per cent of housing units by type (price or rent range, zoning category, owner -occupied and rental, etc.) relative to .demand or to number of families in various income classes in the City? _ _ b. Impacts on existing housing or creation of a demand for additional housing? 16. Trans ortation/Circulation. Will the proposal / resu t n: a. Generation of additional vehicular movement? b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? _ c. Impact upon existing transportation systems? d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? e. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists, or pedestrians? 17. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for, new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? 'b. Police protection? Schools? c. _ d. Parks or other recreational facilities? _ e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? f. Other governmental services? _ _ 1.. 5. Yes Maybe No 18. Public fiscal Balance. Wiil.the proposal, result in a net change in government fiscal flow (revenues less operating expenditures and annualized capital expenditures)? .19. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a ne�or new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: T. Power or natural gas? b. Communications system? i/ c. Water? d. Sewer or septic tanks? e. Storm water drainage? _ f. Solid waste and disposal? 20. Human Health. Will the proposal result in: ' a. The creation of any health hazard or i " potential health hazard? V b. A change in the level of community health care provided? — — 21. Social Services. Will the proposal result in an increased demand for provision of general / _ social services? — — —V/ 22. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in: a. Obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public? b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive / site open to public view? — — —V/ c. Lessening of the overall neighborhood (or area) attractiveness, pleasantness, and uniqueness? 23. Light and Glare-. Will the proposal produce ne:v light or glare? 24_ Archeolo ical/Historical. Will the proposal re— ltin an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object, or building? r 25. Mandatory Findings of Significance. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of: the environment or to curtail the diversity in the environment? b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental.goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) c. Does the project have impacts which are indi- vidually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) d. Does the project have environmegtal effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Initial Study Prepared By: J . - 6. Yes MLbe No J J I O INITIAL STUDY Environmental Evaluation Checklist explanation of "yes" and "maybe" answers, possible mitigation measures, and comments. 1. EARTH b. The soil on the site, which is vacant, will be over -covered by virtue of construction, paving, and landscaping. This activity of the proposed site would not have a negative impact on the environment and no mitigation measures are necessary. e. This proposal may result in temporary wind erosion of soil due to con- struction -Mitigation of impacts will occur by compliance with city requirements for watering during grading and construction phases. 3. WATER b. This proposal will result in a change in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface runoff by virtue of development. Compliance with. applicable grading ordinances at time of development .. will mitigate any adverse impacts. 11. LAND USE The proposed residential project, while not altering the planned residential land use in the area, is requesting; approval of 25% density bonus as allowed by state laws, Therefore, instead of 6 units, the proposal is for 8 units. No mitigation measures are necessary since the project complies with applicable city codes and would provide some affordable housing. 15. HOUSING a. The proposed project, if approved, will add 2 moderately priced and controlled units to the city's housing supply. A need for mederately priced rental housing was identified in the recently prepared housing element update. 16. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION a. The 8 units could generate up to 10 trips per unit per day. That would amount to 80 trips per day for the project. Trip distribution will be primarily towards Fred Waring from San Pablo and San Pascual from the driveway on Santa Rosa. As mitigation measures, street dedications (where applicable) and street improvements will have to be provided. 17. PUBLIC SERVICES c. The Desert Sands Unified School District has advised the city that it is currently experiencing overcrowding conditions and that to mitigate this problem, a school impact mitigation fee of $628 per unit is required. The application has been conditioned to require payment of said fee. 23. LIGHT AND GLARE There may be some new lighting provided for safety, security, and aesthetic reasons. Mitigation measures will include utilization of lights designed for the appropriate use and provided with shields where necessary. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. EXHIBIT "A" WILLIAM SPENCER AFFORDABLE HOUSING AGREEMENT This agreement, made as of this _ day of , 1984, between the City of Palm Desert, a California municipal corporation (hereinafter "CITY") and William Spencer, (hereinafter "DEVELOPER") provides: RECITALS 1. DEVELOPER is owner of certain real property located within the City of Palm Desert, California, which property is described in Exhibit 1, attached hereto and made a part hereof (hereinafter "PROPERTY"). DEVELOPER has applied for and been granted a precise plan (PP 84-44) to construct 8 residential rental units on the PROPERTY. 2. As a condition of said approvals, CITY has required that a specified number of units within Precise Plan 84-44 (hereinafter "PROJECT") be set aside for moderate income occupants subject to restrictions necessary to insure the continued occupancy of said units by moderate income households. 3. DEVELOPER and CITY desire to further memorialize and implement the conditions of said approval and do hereby agree to the following terms and conditions: AGREEMENT 1. DEVELOPER has been conditionally granted permission by the CITY to construct a total of 8 rental residential units on the PROPERTY by Precise Plan 84-44 and Planning Commission Resolution No. As a condition of said approvals DEVELOPER is required, and hereby agrees to reserve for rent 2 units for moderate income households. Hereinafter these 2 units shall be referred to as "AFFORDABLE UNITS'. These AFFORDABLE UNITS shall consist of two (2) two bedroom two bath units. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO- 2. As used herein, "moderate income households" shall refer to families or individuals whose gross income does not exceed the Riverside County median income based upon financial and demographic information received from the United States Department of Housing and Community Development (HUD) or its successor agency. This information is contained in "Exhibit 2" and shall be updated automatically as information is obtained from HUD. If in the future more relevant data is made available by other officially recognized agencies, the applicant may request amendment of this agreement to include such data. 3. Rent for AFFORDABLE UNITS shall not exceed 30`M of the gross income of moderate income households. The maximum rent for the two (2.) two bedroom, two bath units shall be based on income figures for 3 person house- holds, resulting in the following maximum initial rents. These rents shall be adjusted per Article 2 of this agreement. 2 - 2 bedroom, 2 bath $564 4. The DEVELOPER or his assigned management agent shall be responsible for determining elgibility of prospective tenants. Prior to opening the project the DEVELOPER shall submit for approval a plan to the CITY describing the procedure for determining and enforcing eligibility requirements. This plan shall include annual qualification by all eligible households and a semi- annual auditnat the DEVELOPER'S cost by the: CITY or its assigned agents determining compliance with all aspects of this agreement. 5. The DEVELOPER shall not discriminate on the basis of race, creed, sex, national origin, or age. The AFFORDABLE UNITS shall be equipped in the same fashion and their exterior shall be identical in quality and desirability as other units in the project. The AFFORDABLE UNITS shall be evenly dispersed throughout the project. The exact location of the AFFORDABLE UNITS shall be changed from time to time as vacancies permit. 6. The DEVELOPER shall maintain the quality of the buildings, ground and recreation facilities consistent with their condition at the time of issuance of certificate of occupancy. The DEVELOPER shall post a $2,500 bond or other satisfactory security assuring the performance of .any work the CITY feels is necessary to meet this requirement in a form satisfactory to the CITY. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 7. The term of this agreement shall run for thirty years during which period .2 aforementioned AFFORDABLE UNITS shall be reserved for moderate income households. This agreement has been prepared based on the premise that the PROJECT would be operated as rental housing. 8. The provisions of this agreement shall run with, burden and bind the DEVELOPER and his successors. The provisions hereof shall be enforceable by appropriate legal action brought by the CITY. In the event legal action is brought to enforce any provision hereof, the prevailing party shall be intitled to reasonable attorney's fees together with other legally allowable costs. 9. his agreement shall be reviewed by.the CITY,planning commission every 6 months, at which time the applicant or his successor shall be required to demonstrate good faith compliance with the terms of the agreement. If as a result of this review, the commission finds and determines, on the basis of substantial evidence, that the applicant has not complied in good faith with terms or conditions of the agreement, it shall recommend to the city council that the agreement be modified or terminated. If the city council concurs with the planning commission recommendation the agreement shall be modified or terminated. Proceeding before the city council shall be a noticed public hearing. If at the time of the hearings substantial improvements have not yet occurred on the site, termination of the AGREEMENT will also involve revocation of all previous approvals and permits associated herewith and the zoning of the property shall revert to the base R-2. If substantial improvements are already in place and modifications acceptable to the CITY cannot be negotiated, then enforcement of provisions of this agreement shall be pursued through legal action per No. 8 of this AGREEMENT. 10. The AGREEMENT shall be construed according to the laws of the State of California. If any portion of the AGREEMENT is for any reason held to be unenforceable, such determination shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions. 11. Each of the parties hereto covenants and agrees that it has the legal capacity to make the AGREEMENTS herein contained, that each AGREEMENT is binding upon that party and that this AGREEMENT is executed by a duly authorized official acting in his offical capacity. PLANNING COMMISSION REOSLUTION NO. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have executed this Agreement the year and date first above written. THE CITY OF PALM DESERT (-M By DEVELOPER By WILLIAM SPENCER (Notarized) ATTEST: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. EXHIBIT "I" Property Description Lots 12 and 5 Palma Village Garden, Tract 2 M.B. 022/050 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. Persons in the Fames 3 Def inition: Moderate Income: EXHIBIT nr Income Limits Median Family Income Riverside/San Bernardino Counties $22,562 Households with incomes above 80% of the Median Family Income for the number of persons in the family, but below the median delineated above. Palm 2ederf Water &.erviced A_41rict BOARD OF DIRECTORS: ROBERT C. H. LAWMAN. President R. CLAIR McDONOUGH SHARON K. EPPS PHYLLIS GRIGGS, District Secretary 44.500 PORTOLA AVENUE BOX 161 PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92261 Phone: l6191346338 6 Mr. Ramon Diaz Director, Environmental Services City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, California 92260 Re: Case No. 84-44, PMW 84-16, William Spencer 7-Unit Apartment Complex, Santa Rose Way 300' West of San Pasqual Avenue, Lot 5 Palm -Village Garden Tract No. 2 and Lot 12 Palm Village Garden Tract Dear Mr. Diaz: In response to your letter regarding the above referenced project, we would like to make the following comments: 1. Frontage fee of $12.00 per foot will be imposed along Santa Rosa Way. 2. The District will install a 1k-inch water meter at the cost of $1,150. 3. The water service installation charges will be as follows: One 1}-inch water meter @• $1,150/each $1,150 Frontage Fee of 172 feet @ $12.00/Ft 2,064 TOTAL TF, M -4. All-fees'and other charges must be paid before the installation work will begin. 5. At least one week advance notice should be given. 6. There is an existing fire hydrant on the project site between Lot 5 and Lot 12. The addition of any new fire hydrants or relocation of any existing, if required by the City.Fire Marshall would be completed at the owner's expense. The cost of any hydrant improvements would be furnished by the District upon request. Mr. Ramon Diaz October 11, 1984 Page 2 7. A fire sprinkler service connection, if fire sprinklers are required by the City Fire Marshall, would be completed at an additional charge and conditions to be determined upon request and according to the District's standards. 8. The District owns and maintains a 4-inch steel water main which is located on the lot line between Lot 5 and Lot 12. Before the District.can give approval more detailed building plans (i.e. footing and other foundation plans) will have to be submitted to the District along with a copy of the preliminary title report for the property. The owner will have to make additional improvememts to the water main to protect it during and after construction. The extent of those. improvements will be determined upon receipt of the information requested above. 9. rele sing theer lalso Districtgn an areement with the isrict from responsibility for thetremoval of improvements should maintenance or repair on the 4-inch water main be necessary in the future. If you have any questions in regard to the above, please contact US. Very truly yours, PALM DESERT WATER AND SERVICES DISTRICT ROBERT C.H. LAWMAN, President RCHL:DGS:dm RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT IN COOPERATION WITH THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY RAY HEBRARD FIRE -CHIEF October 15, 1984 2I0 WE: PERRI%CALIFORNIA 92370 TELEPHONE: (714) 657.3183 Ramon Diaz RANCHO MIRAGE FIRE STATIM City of Palm Desert 704=HIGHWAYIII 73-510 Fred Waring Drive RANCHO MIRAGE, CA 9260 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Reference: No. PP 84-44, PMW 84-16, Applicant: William Spencer Dear Mr. Diaz, The following fire protection requirements are in accordance with the Uniform Fire Code and Life Safety Code standards. 1. Install a water system capable of delivering 2500 GPM fire flow from any fire hydrant for a 2 hour duration in addition to domestic supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time ofmeasurement. Fire flow requirements will depend on built-in fire pro- tection provisions of buildings. 2. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants so that no point of any building is more than 250 feet from a fire hydrant measured along approved vehicular travel ways. a. exterior surface of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow, and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. b. curbs shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. c. hydrants shall not be located closer than 25 feet to any building. 3 -The water system plan shall be signed by a'registered civil engineer and approved by the water company with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system in PP 84-44, PMW 84:16 is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Fire Marshal." 4. Prior to delivery of combustible materials to the building site, the required water system shall be installed, operating and delivering the required flow. 5. Wrought iron gate on south elevation to have gates for emergency access. 6. Fire lanes will be required. 7. Additional fire protection requirements may be necessary when the applicant submits specific plans for consideration and approval. dpm Very truly yours, RAY HEBRARD Fire Chief By, fM1IKKEEj`MrCCOINNNEL/LV����� Fire Marshal cc: Bob Mainiero MMI, n ESTABLISHED IN 1910 AS A PUBLIC AGENCY COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT POST OFFICE BOX 1D58 • COACHELLA,. CALIFORNIA 92236 • TELEPHONE (6/9) 398R651 DIRECTORS RAYMOND PI. RUMNONDS, PRESIDENT TEWS CODEXAS, VICE PRESIDENT JOHN P. POWELL - PAUL W. NICHOLS STEVE D. BUXTON OFFICERS ENGINEER E LOWELLO. WEEKS.DEN RAL SERNARDI ESUTTON SECRETARY October 12. 1984 REDONE AND$MERRILL ATTORNEYS File: 0163.11 0421.1 0721.1 Department of Environmental Services City of Palm Desert Post Office Box 1977 Palm Desert, California 92261 Gentlemen: Subject: Precise Plan 84-44 and Parcel Map Waiver 84-16, Portion of NEk. Section 20, T5S, R6E, S.B.M. This area is protected from stormwater flows by a system of channels and dikes, and may be considered safe from stormwater flows except in rare instances. This area is shown to be subject to shallow flooding and is designated Zone AO, depth one foot on Federal Flood Insurance rate maps which are in effect at this time. However, we expect the map to be revised due to the construction of the Palm Valley Stormwater Channel. The District will furnish sanitation service to this area in accordance with the current regulations of this District. This area shall be annexed to Improvement District Nos. 54 and 80.of Coachella Valley Water District for sanitation service. Yours very truly, Lowell 0. Weeks General Manager -Chief Engineer CS:ra cc: Riverside County Department of Public Health, Indio TRUE CONSERVATION USE WATER WISELY INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM City of Palm Desert TO:, Director 'of'Environmental Services FROM: Director of Public Works SUBJECT: PP 84-44 William Spencer DATE: October 5, 1984 The following should be considered conditions of approval: 1) Drainage and signalization fund fees, as required by City ordinance, shall be paid prior to building permit issuance. 2) Drainage facilities shall be provided, per Ordinance No. 218 and the Master Drainage Plan, to the specifications of the Director of Public Works. 3) Storm drain construction shall be contingent upon.a drainage study by the private engineer that is approved by the Department of Public Works. 4-)' Full public improvements, including traffic safety lighting, as required by ordinance and the Director of Public Works, shall be installed in accord- ance witb_Lity-standards. 5) Complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the City Engineer for checking and approval before construc- tion of any improvements is commenced. The engineer shall submit "as -built" plans prior to the acceptance of the improvements by the City. 7) Landscaping maintenance on Santa Rosa Way shall be provided by the property owner. 81 Complete grading plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the City Engineer for checking and approval prior to issuance of any permits.. 9) Dedication of 5 feet of right-of-way on Santa Rosa Way shall be done prior to issuance of any permits and approval of plans. 10) Installation of curb and gutter, matching paving and sidewalk on Santa Rosa. 11) Offsite improvement plans to be approved by Public Works Department and a surety posted to guarantee offsite improvements prior to building permit is- suance. 12) Size, number and location of driveways to Public Works specifications with only 1 driveway approach to be allowed to serve this property. 13) Parcel map waiver to be recorded prior to the grading permit issuance. Barry McClellan, P.E. ARC:BM/lo PROOF OF PUr- 1CA►TION (2015.5 C.C.r.) This space Is for County Clerk's Filing Stamp STATE OF CALIFORNIA, County of Riverside I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above -entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of the ............ R�.SFi R7:. P OST................. .............................................. :..... a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published.... Bi-weekly ....................... in the City of ...Rs?�m, Desert County of Riverside, and which news. paper has been adjudged a newspaper of general circulation' by the Superior Court of the County of Riverside, State of California, under the date of„}0(5,, 19.6.4. Case Number AA§58.......; that the notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpareil), has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to -wit: ............11�9/84 ................................. all in the year 19..QA. i Certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated at ....... a....lDesert .m............................ California, this .9th.... day of.Nov; 1984 Sigazure ........ P roe copies of thIS blank Iorrn mar be secured front: CALIFORNIA NEWSPAPER SERVICE BUREAU, INC. Legal Advertising Clearing House 120 west Second St., Los Angeles, Calif. 90012 Telephone: 12131 625.2541 Plea" rpuest Gl NIl AL proof of PuollcNtet wham arderlee this font. n b f rr; m ;T CITY OF PALM DESERTS CD �� ry L" Proof of Publication of cr CASE NOS. PP 8'4-�44 PMW 8'4` 16 land ...............................................1.,:�..... CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE Case Now PPeM1 and PMw a41 e NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN Mel e Publk Hearing will tots hod before the Palm Desert Planning Corn mission to consider a request by WILLIAM SPENCER to, approval of t pesetas plan of design to slow construction of an eight (e) unit apartment complex and a parcel map wallor to consolidate the existing N:o (2) lots Into one lot tot the R.2 zone property located on tin norm side of Santa Rose Wig. 3D0 feel weal of San Pascual - Avenue.ataodewroedes: APN 627-10W28and027 SAID Public Hearing win be hold M Tuesday, November 20, 1984. at 2:00 p.m. lo me Council Chamber at the Palen Desert CNk Center, T3- 510 Fred Waring Drive, Pala Desert, California, at "fell time, and piste all lnbretsted Ferment are Invited to attend and be heard. RAMON A. DVS Secretary Polm Coupon Planning Commtaslon (Pub. O.P. Nov, a. 111114) CITY OF PALM DESERT TRANSMITTAL LETTER TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council REQUEST: Approval of a development agreement, pursuant to Municipal Code Chapter 25:37, specifying terms and conditions for the management of a 8 unit apartment project containing 2 units affordable to moderate income households located on the north side of Santa Rosa Way, 300 feet west of San Pascual. APPLICANT: RELATED CASE NO: DATE: CONTENTS: WILLIAM SPENCER P.O. Box 144 Palm Desert, CA 92261?' PP 84-44 December 27, 1984 A. Staff Recommendation B. Discussion C. Draft Ordinance No. D. Planning Commission Minutes E. Planning Commission Resolution No. 1010 F. Planning Commission Staff Report G. Legal Notice H. California Code Section165915 I. Palm Desert Code Section 25.37 A.' STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Waive further reading and pass to second reading. B. DISCUSSION: This development agreement involves an 8 unit rental project to be developed under the state mandatory density bonus program. The property is entitled to six dwelling units according to code. The applicant, in order to receive a 25% density bonus, has indicated he is prepared to execute the agreement attached to the draft ordinance. The bonus program increases the number of units on the site from 6 to 8. Two of the units will be reserved for moderate income households. Moderate income will be based upon the median income for the county. The agreement contains similar controls as have been applied to past affordable projects. Iq ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT RELATING TO TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF AN 8 UNIT APARTMENT PROJECT CONTAINING 2 UNITS AFFORDABLE BY MODERATE INCOME HOUSEHOLDS. RELATED CASE NO. PP 84-44 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 27th day of December, 1984, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider a request by WILLIAM SPENCER for approval of a development agree- ment specifying terms and conditions for the management of an 8 unit apart- ment project containing 2 "moderate affordable" units to be developed under the density bonus provisions of Section 65915 of the California State Government Code. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, by Resolution No. 1010 has recommended approval; WHEREAS, said application has complied with requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedures to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 80-89", in that the director of environmental services had determined the project has been previously assessed in connection with PP 84-44 for which a negative declaration of environmental impact has been certified. i WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering the testi- mony and arguments of all persons desiring to be heard, said city council did find the following facts to justify its action as described below: 1. The development agreement is consistent with the general plan, zoning ordinance and specifically implements policies contained within the housing element. 2. The proposed agreement complies with Section 65915 of the California Government Code. The City Council of the City of Palm Desert, California, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the city council in this case. 2. That it does hereby approve the Spencer Development Agreement labeled in Exhibit "A". 3. The city clerk is directed to publish this ordinance once in the Palm Desert Post, a newspaper of general circulation, published and circulated in the city of Palm Desert, and shall certify to the passage of adoption of this ordinance, shall submit the agreement to the Riverside County Recorder for recordation, and the same .shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its adoption. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Palm Desert, California, held on the _ day of , 1984, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN:' ATTEST: WALTER H. SNYDER, Mayor SHEILA R. GILLIGAN, City Clerk City of Palm Desert, California a ORDINANCE NO. EXHIBIT "A" WILLIAM SPENCER AFFORDABLE HOUSING AGREEMENT This agreement, made as of this _ day of , 1984, between the City of Palm Desert, a California municipal corporation (hereinafter "CITY") and William Spencer, (hereinafter "DEVELOPER") provides: i Recitals 1. DEVELOPER is owner of certain real property located within the City of Palm Desert, California, which property is described in Exhibit 1, attached hereto and made a part hereof (hereinafter !'PROPERTY"). DEVELOPER has applied for and received approval of a precise plan (PP 84-44) to construct eight residential rental units on the PROPERTY. 2. As a condition of said approvals, CITY has required that a specified number of units within Precise Plan 84-44 (hereinafter "PROJECT") would be set aside for moderate income occupants subject to restrictions necessary to insure the continued occupancy of said units by moderate income households. 3. DEVELOPER and CITY desire to further memorialize and implement the conditions of said approval and do hereby agree to the following terms and conditions. Agreement 1. DEVELOPER has been conditionally granted permission by the CITY to construct eight rental residential units on the PROPERTY by Precise Plan and Planning Commission Resolution No. 1010. As a condition of said approvals DEVELOPER is required, and hereby agrees to reserve for rent two units for moderate income households. Hereinafter these two units shall be referred to as "AFFORDABLE UNITS". These AFFORDABLE UNITS shall consist of 2 two -bedroom units. ORDINANCE NO. 2. As used herein, "moderate income households" shall refer to families or individuals whose gross income is between 80% and 100% of the Riverside County median income based upon financial and demographic information received from the United States Department of Housing and Community Development (HUD) or its successor agency. This information is contained in "Exhibit 2" and shall be updated automatically as information is obtained from HUD. If in the future more relevant data is made available by other officially recognized agencies, the applicant may request amendment of this agreement to include such data. 3. Rent for affordable units shall not exceed 30% of the gross income of moderate income households. The maximum rent for the 2 two bedroom, two bath units shall be based on income figures for three person households, resulting in the following maximum initial rents. This rent shall be adjusted per Article 2 of this agreement. 2 - 2 bedroom, 2 bath $564 4. The DEVELOPER or his assigned management agent shall be responsible for determining elgibility of prospective tenants. Prior to opening the project the DEVELOPER shall submit for approval a plan to the CITY describing the procedure for determining and enforcing eligibility requirements. This plan shall include annual qualification by all eligible households and a semi- annual audit at the DEVELOPER'S cost by the CITY or its assigned agents determining compliance with all aspects of this agreement. 5. The DEVELOPER shall not discriminate on the basis of race, creed, sex, national origin, or age. The AFFORDABLE UNITS shall be equipped in the same fashion and their exterior shall be identical in quality and desirability as other units in the project. The AFFORDABLE UNITS shall be evenly dispersed throughout the project. The exact location of the AFFORDABLE UNITS shall be changed from time to time as vacancies permit. 6. The DEVELOPER shall maintain the quality of the buildings, grounds and recreation facilities consistent with their condition at the time of issuance ORDINANCE NO. of certificate of occupancy. The DEVELOPER shall post a $2,500 bond or other satisfactory security assuring the performance of any work the CITY feels is necessary to meet this requirement in a form satisfactory to the CITY. 7. The term of this agreement shall run for thirty years during which period two aforementioned AFFORDABLE UNITS shall be reserved for moderate income households. This agreement has been prepared based on the premise that the PROJECT will be operated as rental housing. The DEVELOPER or his successor may apply to amend this agreement to allow condominium conversion. The DEVELOPER will be required to conform to all applicable zoning and building regulations. The amendment would include a program to maintain the availability of the AFFORDABLE UNITS for moderate income households throughout the remaining term of the agreement. 8. The provisions of this agreement shall run with, burden and bind. the DEVELOPER and his successors. - The provisions hereof shall be enforceable by appropriate legal action brought by the CITY. In the event legal action is brought to enforce any provision hereof, the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorney's fees together with other legally allowable costs. 9. This agreement shall be reviewed by the CITY planning commission every 6 months, at which time the applicant or his -successor shall be required to demonstrate good faith compliance with the terms of the agreement. If as a result of this review, the commission finds and determines, on the basis of substantial evidence, that the applicant has not complied in good faith with terms or conditions of the agreement, it shall recommend to the city council that the agreement be modified or terminated. If the city council concurs with the planning commission recommendation the agreement shall be modified or terminated. Proceeding before the city council shall be a noticed public hearing. If at the time of the hearings substantial improvements have not yet occurred on the site, termination of the AGREEMENT will also involve revocation of all previous approvals and permits associated herewith and the zoning of the property shall revert to ORDINANCE NO. R-2. If substantial improvements are already in place and modifications acceptable to the CITY cannot be negotiated then enforcement of provisions of this agreement shall be pursued through legal action per No. 8 of this AGREEMENT. 10. The AGREEMENT shall be construed according to the laws of the State of California. If any portion of the AGREEMENT is for any reason held to be unenforceable, such determination shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions. 11. Each of the parties hereto covenants and agrees that it has the legal capacity to make the AGREEMENTS herein contained, that each AGREEMENT is binding upon that. party and that this AGREEMENT is executed by a duly authorized official acting in his official capacity. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have executed this Agreement the year and date first above written. THE CITY OF PALM DESERT DEVELOPER WILLIAM SPENCER (Notarized) ATTEST: ORDINANCE NO. EXHIBIT "1" PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Lots 12 and 5 Palma Village Garden, Tract 2 M.B. 022/050 ORDINANCE NO. EXHIBIT !'2" INCOME LIMITS Persons in the Family 3 Definition: Moderate Income: Median Family Income Riverside/San Bernardino $22,562 Households with incomes above 80% of the Median Family Income for the number of persons in the family, but below the median delineated above. CITY OF PALM DESERT STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission DATE: November 20, 1984 CASE NO: PP 84-44 and PMW 84-16 REQUEST: Approval of a precise plan of design, negative declaration of environmental impact, and parcel map waiver to consolidate the site into one lot to allow construction of a 8 unit apartment project (utilizing 25% density bonus allowed by state law) in the R-2 zone located on the north side of Santa Rosa Way 200 feet west of San Pascual. APPLICANT: William Spencer P.O. Box 144 Palm Desert, CA 92261 I. BACKGROUND: A. DESCRIPTION OF SITE: The property is a flat, 26,476 square foot rectangular shaped site. Above ground power lines exist along the north side of the site. Along the south property line around the developed site is a cedar board fence. B. ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE: North: R-2/Vacant South: R-2/Apartments East: R-2/single family. -dwelling West: R-2/Apartments C. GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION: Medium density residential, 5-7 d.u./acre II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A. (GENERAL The project consists of 8 two bedroom apartment units provided in two buildings utilizing one story structures. Each of the units will be 936 square feet. The R-2 zone allows one unit for every 4,000 square feet of lot area. The three buildings will be located in 2 rows perpendicular to Santa Rosa. A 25 foot driveway provides access to parking located at the west end of the property. B. DENSITY: As stated previously, the R-2 zoning permits one unit for every 4,000 square feet. For this 26,476 square foot lot, 6 units would be permitted. Chapter 4.3 of the State Planning Law (California Code No. 65915) states that should a developer provide at least 25% of the units within a housing project affordable to low or moderate income households, the city shall grant a density bonus or increase of at least 25% over the number of units allowed by the zoning. If the city does not grant the increased density, then it must provide equivalent financial incentives. PP 84-44 and PMW 84-16 Continued November 20, 1984 I'fi•this case the density bonus, would increase the permitted number of units to 8 units. The additional two units will have to be affordable to moderate income households (three person households) earning less than $22,562. Maximum rent for these three units initially will be $564.00 per month. A development agreement (draft copy attached) will have to be approved by the city council prior to issuance of any building permits. The increased density will not result in significant negative traffic or aesthetic impacts. C. PARKING: Code requires that a total of at least 16 parking spaces be provided for an 8 unit:; apartment complex of which at least 8 must be covered. The project provides 16 parking spaces (8 covered and 8 open). ;The, parking as proposed is consistent with the code provisions. D. ARCHITECTURE/DESIGN: More complete architectural plans will be reviewed and must be approved by the architectural commission. III. ANALYSIS: A. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL OF PRECISE PLAN: 1. The design of the precise plan will not substantially depreciate property values in the vicinity. Response: The precise plan as approved will comply with code requirements; architectural plans must be approved by the architectural commission and the project will be the first new development in the area in some time. The project whould not substantially depreciate property values in the vicinity. 2. The precise plan will not unreasonably interfere with the use of and enjoyment of property in the vicinity by the occupants thereof for lawful purposes. Response: the surrounding land in the vicinity is zoned for the same type of use as proposed, and owners would not be deprived the use of their land. 3. The precise plan will not endanger the public peach, health, safety, j or general welfare. Response: The precise plan will comply with all code, requirements and must receive architectural commission approval and will not be detrimental to the public peach, health, safety, or general welfare. The plan as submitted complies with code. Commission should review the precise plan and determine its adequacy relative to the required findings. B. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL OF PARCEL MAP WAIVER: The required findings for approval are that the proposed waiver and the resulting parcels comply with applicable requirements as to area, improvement and design, floodwater drainage control, appropriate improved public roads, sanitary disposal facilities, water supply avail- ability, environmental protection, and other requirements of the municipal code. These findings can be justified because the project complies with applicable city ordinances and can be serviced adequately by the utilities. PP 84-44 and PMW 84-16 Continued November 20, 1984 C. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The director of environmental services has determined that the proposed project will not have an adverse environmental impact on the environment and a negative declaration of environmental impact has been prepared. IV. RECOMMENDATION: The plan as submitted complies with code. Should commission wish to approve the propsed precise plan, parcel map waiver, and negative declaration of environmental impact, the appropriate action would:be: a. Adoption of the findings. b, Adoption of Resolution No. approving PP 84-44 and PMW 84-16. V. ATTACHMENTS: a. Draft Resolution b. Legal Notice c. Draft Development Agreement d. Comments from city departments and agencies e. Plans and Exhibits (draft development agreement) Prepared by::.<Y�- Q�jJ ij r Reviewed and approved by: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PRECISE PLAN OF DESIGN, PARCEL MAP WAIVER AND A NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT AND RECOMMENDING APPROVAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A 8 UNIT APARTMENT PROJECT ON THE NORTH SIDE OF SANTA ROSA WAY 300 FEET WEST OF SAN PASCUAL. CASE NO'S. PP 84-44 and PMW 84-16 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 20th day of November, 1984, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider a request by WILLIAM SPENCER for approval of a precise plan of design, parcel map waiver, negative declaration of environmental impact, and development agreement to allow construction of a 8 unit apartment complex on a 26,476 square foot site on the north side of Santa Rosa Way, 300 feet west of San Pascual. WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedures for Implementation of the California Evnironmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 80-89", in that the director of environmental services has determined that the project will not have a negative impact on the environment and a negative declaration has been prepared. WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said commission did find the following facts and reasons to exist to justify its actions: 1. The design of the precise plan will not substantially depreciate property values in the vicinity. 2. The precise plan will not unreasonably interfere with the use or enjoyment of property in the vicinity by the occupants thereof for lawful purposes. 3. The precise plan will not endanger the public peace, health, safety, or general welfare. 4. That the proposed waiver to consolidate two lots into one lot and that resulting parcel complies with applicable requirements as to area, imp- rovement and design, floodwater drainage control, appropriate improved public roads, sanitary disposal facilities, water supply availability, environmental protection, and other requirements of the municipal code. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, california, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the commission in this case. 2. That approval of Precise Plan 84-44 is hereby granted for reasons subject to the attached conditions. 3. That approval of PMW 84-16 is hereby granted. 4. That a negative declaration of environmental impact is hereby approved subject to implementation of the attached conditions. 5. Approval of the Williams Development Agreement, Exhibit "C" is recommended to the city council. PLANNING RESOLUTION NO. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular -meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 20th day of November, 1984, by the following vote, to wit: 7AtY"'EiS: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: BUFORD CRITES, Chairman ATTEST: RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PP 84-44 and PMW 84-16 DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES: 1. This approval is contingent upon final adoption of the proposed Housing Element to the Palm Desert General Plan, GPA 84-01 and execution of a development agreement. 2. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for construction of any uses con- templated by this approval, the applicant shall first complete all the proce- dural requirements for the city which include, but are not limited to, design review and building permits. 3. The development of the property shall conform with all approved exhibits on file with the Department of Environmental Services and to all municipal, state, and federal statutes now in force or which here after may be in force. 4. Construction of a portion of said project shall commence within one year from the date of final approval unless a time extension is granted, otherwise said approval shall become null, void and of no effect whatsoever. j5. Prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contem- plated by this approval, the applicant shall first obtain permits and/or clearance from- the following agencies: Riverside County Department of Health Palm Desert Architectural Commission City Fire Marshal Coachella Valley Water District Palm Desert Water Services District 6. Provisions for mail service shall be coordinated with the Palm Desert Branch, U.S. Postal Service. 7. Location and design of trash enclosures shall be coordinated with Palm Desert Disposal Company. 8. That. _the.,owner (developer) prior to issuance of building permit, provide evidence to the city that he has paid school mitigation fee ($628/unit) to the Desert Sands Unified School District. 9. All existing electrical distribution lines, telephone, cable antenna television, and similar wires or cables which are on or adjacent to the property being developed shall be installed underground, if practible as a part of development. from the nearest existing pole not on the property being developed. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS: 1. Drainage and signalization fund fees, as required by city ordinance, shall be paid prior to building permit issuance. 2. Drainage facilities shall be provided, per Ordinance No. 218 and the Master Drainage Plan, to the specifications of the director of public works. 3. Storm drain construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study by the private engineer that is approved by the department of public works. 4. Full public improvements, including traffic safety lighting, as required by ordinance and the director of public works, shall be installed in accordance with city standards. 5. Complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the city engineer for checking and approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. The engineer shall submit "as -built" plans prior to the acceptance of the improvements by the city. e PP 84-44 and PMW 84-16 (continued) DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS (Continued) 6. Landscaping maintenance on Santa Rosa Way shall be provided by the property owner. 7. Complete grading plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the city engineer for checking and approval prior to issuance of any permits. 8. Dedication of 5 feet of right-of-way on Santa Rosa Way shall be done prior to issuance of any permits and approval of plans., 9. Installation of curb and gutter, matching paving and sidewalk on Santa Rosa. 10. Offsite improvement plans to be approved by public works department and a surety posted to guarantee offsite improvements prior to building permit issuance. 11. Size, number and location of driveways to public works specification with only one driveway approach to be allowed to serve this property. 13. Parcel map waiver to be recorded prior to the grading permit issuance. CITY FIRE MARSHAL: 1. Install a water system capable of delivering 2500 GPM fire flow from any fire hydrant for a 2 hour duration in addition to domestic supply. The com- putation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measure- ment. Fire flow requirements will depend on built-in fire protection provisions of buildings. 2. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants so that no point of any building is more than 250 feet from a fire hydrant measured along approved vehicular travel ways. a. Exterior surface of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow, and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. b. Curbs shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. c. Hydrants shall not be located closer than 25 feet to any building. 3. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and approved by the water company with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system in PP 84-44, PMW 84-16 is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Fire Marshal." 4. Prior to delivery of combustible materials to the building site, the required water system shall be installed, operating and delivering the required flow. 5. Wrought iron gate on 'south elevation to have gates forremergency access. 6. Fire lanes will be required. 7. Additional fire protection requirements may be necessary when the applicant submits specific plans for consideration and approval. PALM DESERT WATER & SER.VICES: DISTRICT: 1. Frontage fee of $12.00 per foot will be imposed along Santa Rosa Way. 2. The district will;dnstall a 1}'inch water meter at the cost of $1,150. 3. The water service installation charges will be as follows: One 12' inch water meter @ $1,150/each $1,150. Frontage fee of 172 feet 2,064/foot 2,064. TOTAL $3,214. 4. All fees and other charges must be paid before the installation work will begin. PP 84-44 anddPMW 84-16 (Continued)' PALM DESERT WATER & SERVICES DISTRICT 5. At least one week advance notice should be given. 6. There is an existing fire hydrant on the project site between Lot 5 and Lot 12. The addition of any new fire hydrants or relocation of any existing, if required by the City Fire Marshal would be completed at the ownen's expense. The cost of any hydrant improvements would be furnished by the District upon request. 7. A fire sprinkler service connection, if fire sprinklers are required by the City Fire Marshal, would be completed at an additional charge and conditions to be determined upon request and according to the district's standards. 8. 'Pie district owns and maintains a 4 inch steel water main which isAocated on the lot line between Lot 5 and Lot 12. Before the district can give approval more detailed building plans (i.e. footing and other foundation plans) will have to be submitted to the district along with a copy of the preliminary title report for the property. The owner will have to make additional improvements to the water main to protect it during and after construction. The extent of those improvements, willl be determined upon receipt of the information requested above. 9. The owner will also sign an agreement with the diistrict releasing the district from responsibility for the removal of improvements should maintenance or repair on the 4 inch water main be necessary in the future. LEGE October 26, 1984 CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE Case Nos. PP 84-44 and PMW 84-16 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by WILLIAM SPENCER for approval of a precise plan of design to allow construction of an eight (8) unit apartment complex -and a parcel map waiver to consolidate the existing two (2) lots into one lot for the R-2 zoned property located on thenorth side of Santa Rosa Way, 300 feet west of San Pascual Avenue, also described as: APN 627-101-026 and 027 SAID Public Hearing will be held on Tuesday, November 20, 1984, at 2:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber at the Palm Desert Civic Center, 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. PUBLISH: Desert Post November 9, 1984 AM RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary Palm Desert. Planning Commission 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 NEGATIVE DECLARATION (Pursuant to Title 14, Division 6, Article 7, Section 15083, of the California Administrative Code) Common Project Case No: PP 84-44 and PMW 84-16 Name (if any) Spencer Apartment Complex Applicant/Project Sponsor: William Spencer, P.O. Box 144, Palm Desert, CA 92261 Project Description/Location: construction of eight (8) apartment units on a 26,476 square foot lot. The Director,./of the Department of Environmental Services, City of Palm Desert, California, has found that the described project will not have a significant effect on the environment. A copy of the initial study has been attached to document the-r6asons in support of this finding. Mitigation measures, if any, included in the project to avoid potentially significant effects, may also be found attached. RAMON A. DIAZ DATE Director of Environmental Services CASE NO.PPQy_yyf�� ENVII2ON?:IENTAL SERVICES DEPT. INITIAL STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION CHECKLIST NOTE: The availability of data necessary to address the topics listed below shall form:, the basis of a decision as to whether the application is considered complete for purposes of environmental assessment. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers, possible mitigation measures and comments are provided on attached sheets). . , . Yes Maybe No 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? — -- -- b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction, or �/ overcovering of the soil? — — -- c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? d. The destruction, covering,, or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of ` soils, either on or off the site? l/ 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: — — a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors? c. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? 2, Yes Maybe No 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: a... Changes in currents,'or the course or 1' direction / of water movements? b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? c. Alterations to the.course or flow of flood waters? V d. Alteration of -the direction or rate of _ flow of ground waters? _ e. Change in the quantity.of ground waters, either through direct additions or with- drawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? f. Reduction in the amount of water other- - wise available for public water supplies? ✓ 4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: i a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of plants. (including trees, shrubs, grass, and crops)? V b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or endangered species of plants? , J c. Introduction of new species of plants into area, in a barrier to the normal re replenishmeme nt of existing species? 5. Animal. Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, or insects)? / V b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, — — rare, or endangered species of animals? c. Introduction of new species of animals _ into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration to existing wildlife M 10 11 12 13 6. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in�.the rate of use of any natural resources? - r b. Depletion ofeany non-renewable natural resource? 7. Enervv. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? b. Demand upon existing sources of energy, or re- quire the -development of new sources of energy? ' sti Risk of Upset:?;Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of, hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, pesticides, oil, chemicals, or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? 'c Economic :i Will the proposal result in: a. A change in the value of property and improvements endangered by flooding? t' b. A change in the value of property.and 1mproverientsrexposed to geologic hazards beyond accepted community risk standards? Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels toethe point at which accepted community noise and vibration levels are exceeded? Land Use. Willethe proposal result in the a tT eration of the present developed or Planned land use of an area? iRen Space. Will the proposal lead to a decrease in the;amount of designated open space? Population. Will the proposal result in: a. Alterat.ien Of the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human Population of -the Citv? b. Change in the population distribution by age, income,-4•eligion, racial, or ethnic group, occupational class, household type? V V 3. No 1/ V 4. Yes Maybe No 14. Emoloyment. Will the proposal result in additional new long-term jobs provided, or a change in the number and per cent employed, unemployed, and underemployed? v 15. Ho us ing. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in number and per cent of housing units by type (price or rent range, zoning category, owner -occupied and rental, etc.) relative to .demand or to number of / -families in various income classes in the City? 1/ b. Impacts on existing housing or creation of a / demand for additional housing? 16. Trans ortation/Circulation. Will the proposal / result a. Generation of additional vehicular movement? b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? C. Impact upon existing transportation systems? _ d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? — e. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, / bicyclists, or pedestrians? 17. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect _ _ _✓ upon, or result in a need for, new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? b. Police protection? c. Schools? ,L d. Parks or other recreational facilities? e. Maintenance of public facilities, including / roads? f. Other governmental services? _ _ ✓ 18. Public Fiscal Balance. Will the proposal result 1n a net change in government fiscal flow (revenues less operating expenditures and annualized capital expenditures)? 19. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: -.—Power or natural gas. b. Communications system? C. Water? d. Sewer or septic tanks? e. Storm water drainage? f. Solid waste and disposal? 20. Huma�th. Will the proposal result in: a. The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? b. A change in the level of community health care provided? 21. Social Services. Will the proposal result in an increased denand for provision of general social services? 22. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in: a. Obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public? b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? c. Lessening of the overall neighborhood (or area) attractiveness, pleasantness, and uniqueness? 23. Light and Glares. Will the new light or glare? proposal produce 2.4_. cheolo ical/Historical. Will the proposalresu in n�a teionof a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object, or building' 5. Yes Maybe No IN 1L_ V r Yes 25. Mandatory Findings of Significance. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of, the environment or to curtail the diversity in the environment? b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) c. Does the project have impacts which are indi- vidually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Initial Study Prepared By: __4 1'c * 55 OC / ,c Co l `l K Ct 11 aLt a No J I INITIAL STUDY Environmental Evaluation Checklist explanation of "yes" and "maybe" answers, possible mitigation measures, and comments. 1. EARTH b. The soil on the site, which is vacant, will be over -covered by virtue of construction, paving, and landscaping. This activity of the proposed site would not have a negative impact on the environment and no mitigation measures are necessary. e. This proposal may result in temporary wind erosion of soil due to con- struction -Mitigation of impacts will occur by compliance with city requirements for watering during grading and construction phases. 3. WATER b. This proposal will result in a change in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface runoff by virtue of development. Compliance with applicable grading ordinances at time of development will mitigate any adverse impacts. 11. LAND USE The proposed residential project, while not altering the planned residential land use in the area, is requesting; approval of 25% density bonus as allowed by state law:7i Therefore, instead of 6 units, the proposal is for 8 units. No mitigation measures are necessary since the project complies with applicable city codes and would provide some affordable housing. 15. HOUSING .a. The proposed project, if approved, will add 2 moderately priced and controlled units to the city's housing supply. A need for mederately priced rental housing was identified in the recently prepared housing element update. 16. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION a. The 8 units could generate up to 10 trips per unit per day. That would amount to 80 trips per day for the project. Trip distribution will be primarily towards Fred Waring from San Pablo and San Pascual from the driveway on Santa Rosa. As mitigation measures, street dedications (where applicable) and street ,improvements will have to be provided. 17. PUBLIC SERVICES c. The Desert Sands Unified School District has advised the city that it is currently experiencing overcrowding conditions and that to mitigate this problem, a school impact mitigation fee of $628 per unit is required. The application has been conditioned to require payment of said fee. 23: LIGHT AND GLARE There may be some new lighting. provided for safety, security, and aesthetic reasons. Mitigation measures will include utilization of lights designed for the appropriate use and provided with shields where_ necessary. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. EXHIBIT "A" WILLIAM SPENCER AFFORDABLE HOUSING AGREEMENT This agreement, made as of this _ day of . , 1984, between the City,of Palm Desert, a California municipal corporation (hereinafter "CITY',)' and William Spencer, (hereinafter "DEVELOPER") provides: RECITALS 1 DEVELOPER is owner of certain real property located within the City of Palm Desert, California, which property is described in Exhibit 1, attached hereto and made a part hereof (hereinafter "PROPERTY"). DEVELOPER has applied for and been granted a precise plan (PP 84-44) to construct 8 residential rental units on the PROPERTY. 2. As a condition of said approvals, CITY has required that a specified number of units within Precise Plan 84-44 (hereinafter "PROJECT") be set aside for moderate income occupants subject to restrictions necessary to insure the continued occupancy of said units -by moderate income households. 3., DEVELOPER and CITY desire to further memorialize and implement the conditions of said approval and do hereby agree to the following terms and conditions: AGREEMENT 1. DEVELOPER has been conditionally granted permission by.the CITY to construct a total of 8 rental residential units on the PROPERTY by Precise Plan 84-44 and Planning Commission Resolution No. As a condition of said approvals DEVELOPER is required, and hereby agrees to reserve for rent 2 units for moderate income households. Hereinafter these 2 units shall be referred to as "AFFORDABLE'°UNITS". These AFFORDABLE UNITS shall consist of two (2) two bedroom two bath units. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2. As used herein, "moderate income households" shall refer to families or individuals whose gross income does not exceed the Riverside County median income based upon financial and demographic information received from the United States Department of Housing and Community Development (HUD) or its successor agency. This information is contained in "Exhibit 2" and shall be updated automatically as information is obtained from HUD. If in the future more relevant data is made available by other officially recognized agencies, the applicant may request amendment of this agreement to include such data. 3. Rent for AFFORDABLE UNITS shall not exceed 30% of the gross income of moderate income households. The maximum rent for the two (2) two bedroom, two bath units 'shall be based on income figures for 3 person house- holds, resulting in the following maximum initial rents.=. These rents shall be adjusted per Article 2 of this agreement. 2 - 2 bedroom, 2 bath $564 4. The DEVELOPER or his assigned management agent shall be responsible for determining elgibility of prospective tenants. Prior to opening the project the DEVELOPER shall submit for approval a plan to the CITY describing the procedure for determining and enforcing eligibility requirements. This plan shall include annual qualification by all eligible households and a semi- annual audit.7at the DEVELOPER'S cost by the ,CITY or its assigned agents determining compliance with all aspects of this agreement. 5. The DEVELOPER shall not discriminate on the basis of race, creed, sex, national origin, or age. The AFFORDABLE UNITS shall be equipped in the same fashion and their exterior shall be identical in quality and desirability as other units in the project. The AFFORDABLE UNITS shall be evenly dispersed throughout the project. The exact location of the AFFORDABLE UNITS shall be changed from time to time as vacancies permit. 6. The DEVELOPER shall maintain the quality of the buildings, ground and recreation facilities consistent with their condition at the time of issuance of certificate of occupancy. The DEVELOPER shall post a $2,500 bond or other satisfactory security assuring the performance of any work the CITY feels is necessary to meetithis requirement in a form satisfactory to the CITY. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 7. The term of this agreement shall run for thirty years during which period 2 aforementioned AFFORDABLE UNITS shall be reserved for moderate income households. This agreement has been prepared based on the premise that the PROJECT would be operated as rental housing. 8. The provisions of this agreement shall run with, burden and bind the DEVELOPER and his successors. The provisions hereof shall be enforceable by appropriate legal action brought by the CITY. In the event legal action is brought to enforce any provision hereof, the prevailing party shall be intitled to reasonable attorney's fees together with other legally allowable costs. 9. :'his agreement shall be reviewed by the CITY planning commission every 6 months, at which time the applicant or his successor shall be required to demonstrate good faith compliance with the terms of the agreement. If as a result of this review, the commission finds and determines, on the basis of substantial evidence, that the applicant has not complied in good faith with terms or conditions of the agreement, it shall recommend to the city council that the agreement be modified or terminated. If the city council concurs with the planning commission recommendation the agreement shall be modified or terminated. Proceeding before the city council shall be a noticed public hearing. If at the time of the hearings substantial improvements have not yet occurred on the site, termination of the AGREEMENT will also involve revocation of all previous approvals and permits associated herewith and the zoning of the property shall revert to the base R-2. If substantial improvements are already;in place and modifications acceptable to the CITY cannot be negotiated, then enforcement of provisions of this agreement shall be pursued through legal action per No. 8 of this AGREEMENT. 10. The AGREEMENT shall be construed according to the laws of the State of California. If any portion of the AGREEMENT is for any reason held to be unenforceable, such determination shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions. 11. Each of the parties hereto covenants and agrees that it has the legal capacity to. make the AGREEMENTS herein contained, that each AGREEMENT is binding upon that party and that this AGREEMENT is executed by a duly authorized official acting in his offical capacity. PLANK NGCOMMISSION REOSLUTION NO.-11 IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have executed this Agreement the year and date first above written. THE CITY OF PALM DESERT By By DEVELOPER By WILLIAM SPENCER (Notarized) ATTEST:. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. EXHIBIT "1" Property Description Lots 12 and 5 Palma Village Garden, Tract 2 M.B. 022/050 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. r Persons in the Family; 3 Definition: Moderate Income: EXHIBIT "2" Income Limits Median Family Income Riverside/San Bernardino Counties $22,562 Households with incomes above 80% of the Median Family Income for the number of persons in the family, but below the median delineated above. Palm cA.4erf Water & Serviced A.41rid BOARD OF DIRECTORS: ROBERT C. H. LAWMAN, President R. CLAIR McDONOUGH SHARON K. EPPS PHYLLIS GRIGGS. District Secretary 44.500 PORTOLA AVENUE BOX 161 PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92261 Mr. Ramon Diaz Director, Environmental Services City of Palm Desert 73-5,10 Fred Waring'Drive' Palm Desert, California 92260 Re: Case No. 84-44, PMW 84-16, William Spencer 7-Unit Apartment Complex, Santa Rose Way , 300' West of San Pasqual Avenue, Lo.t 5 Palm Village Garden Tract No. 2 and Lot 12 Palm Village Garden Tract Dear Mr. Diaz: Phone: (619) 346-6338 In response to your letter regarding the above referenced project, we would like to make the following comments: 1. Frontage fee of $12.00 per foot will be imposed along Santa Rosa Way. 2.' The District will install a li-inch water meter at the cost of $1,150. 3. The water service installation charges will be as follows: One li-inch water meter @ $1,150/each $1,150 Frontage Fee of 172 feet @ $12.00/Ft 2,064 .TOTAL $3,214 4. All--fees'and other charges must be paid before the installation work will begin. 5. At least one week advance notice should be given. 6. There is an existing fire hydrant on the project site between Lot 5 and Lot 12. The addition of any new fire hydrants or relocation of any existing, if required by the City Fire Marshall would be completed at the owner's expense. The cost of any hydrant improvements would be furnished by the District upon request. Mr. Ramon Diaz October 11, 1984 Page 2 7. A fire sprinkler service connection, if fire sprinklers are required by the City Fire Marshall, would be completed at an additional charge and conditions to be determined upon request and according to the District's standards. 8. The District owns and maintains a 4-inch steel water main which is located on the lot line between Lot 5 and Lot 12. Before the District.can give approval more detailed building plans (i.e. footing and other foundation plans) will have to be submitted to the District along with a copy of the preliminary title report for the property. The owner will have to make additional improvememts to the water main to protect it during and after construction. The extent of those improvements will be determined upon receipt of the information requested above. 9. The owner will also sign an agreement with the District releasing the District from responsibility for the removal of improvements should maintenance or repair on the 4-inch water main be necessary in the future. If you have any questions in regard to the above, please contact US. Very truly yours, PALM DESERT WATER AND SERVICES DISTRICT ROBERT C.H. LAWMAN, President RCHL:DGS:dm RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT IN COOPERATION WITH THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY RAY HEBRARD FIRE CHIEF October 15, 1984 210 W EST SAN JACINTO AVENUE PERRIS, CALIFORNIA 92370 TELEPHONE: (714) 657,3183 Ramon Diaz RANCHO MIRAGE FIRE STATIC* City of Palm Desert 70-800 HIGHWAY 111 73-510 Fred Waring Drive RANCHO MIRAGE, CA 92i7Q Palm Desert, CA 92260 Reference: No. PP 84-44, PMW 84-16, Applicant: William Spencer Dear Mr. Diaz, The following fire protection requirements are in accordance with the Uniform Fire Code and Life Safety Code standards. 1. Install a water system capable of delivering 2500 GPM fire flow from any fire hydrant for a 2 hour duration in addition to domestic supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement. Fire flow requirements will depend on built-in fire pro- tection provisions of buildings. 2. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants so that no point of any building is more than 250 feet from a fire hydrant measured along approved vehicular travel ways. a. exterior surface of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow, and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. b. curbs shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. c. hydrants shall not be located closer than 25 feet to any building. 3 - The water system plan shall be signed by a'registered civil engineer and approved by the water company with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system in PP 84-44, PMW 84-16 is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Fire Marshal." 4. Prior to delivery of combustible materials to the building site, the required water system shall be installed, operating and delivering the required flow. 5. Wrought iron gate on south elevation to have gates for emergency access. 6. Fire lanes will be required. 7. Additional fire protection requirements may be necessary when the applicant submits specific plans for consideration and approval. Very truly yours, RAY HEBRARD Fire Chief By, MIKE MCCONNELL dpm Fire Marshal cc: Bob Mainiero PDWSD a ESTABLISHED IN 1918 AS A PUBLIC AGENCY COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT POST OFFICE BOX 1058 • COACHELLA, CALIFORNIA 92236 • TELEPHONE (619) 398-2651 DIRECTORS OFFICERS RAYMOND R. RUMMONDS, PRESIDENT LOW ELL 0. WEEKS, GENERAL MANAGER -CHIEF ENGINEER TELLIS CODEKAS, VICE PRESIDENT October 12, 1984 BERNARDINE SUTTON, SECRETARY JOHN P. POWELL REDWINE AND SHERRILL, ATTORNEYS PAUL W. NICHOLS STEVE D. BUXTON Department of Environmental Services City of Palm Desert Post Office Box 1977 Palm Desert, California 92261 Gentlemen: File: 0163.11 0421.1 0721.1 Subject: Precise Plan 84-44 and Parcel Map Waiver 84-16, Portion of NEB, Section 20, T5S, R6E, S.B.M. This area is protected from stormwater flows by a system of channels and dikes, and may be considered safe from stormwater flows except in rare instances. This area is shown to be subject to shallow flooding and is designated Zone AO, depth one foot on Federal Flood Insurance rate maps which.are in effect at this time. However, we expect the map to be revised due to the construction of the Palm Valley Stormwater Channel. The District will furnish sanitation service to this area in accordance with the current regulations of this District. This area shall be annexed to Improvement District Nos. 54 and 80 of Coachella Valley Water District for sanitation service. Yours very truly, C�,.lj1,L,1�iLC� Lowell 0. Weeks General Manager -Chief Engineer CS:ra cc: Riverside County Department of Public Health, Indio TRUE CONSERVATION USE WATER WISELY INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM City of Palm Desert TO: Director of Environmental Services FROM: Director of Public Works SUBJECT: PP 84-44 William Spencer DATE: October 5, 1984 The following should be_considered conditions of approval: 1) Drainage and signalization fund fees, as required by City ordinance, shall be paid prior to building permit issuance. 2) Drainage facilities shall be provided, per Ordinance No. 218 and the Master Drainage Plan, to the specifications of the Director of Public Works. .3) Storm drain construction shall be contingent upon.a drainage study by the private engineer that is approved by the Department of Public Works. 4)' Full public improvements, including traffic safety lighting, as required by ordinance and the Director of Public Works, shall be installed in accord- ance with-_City.standards. 5) Complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the City Engineer for checking and approval before construc- tion of any improvements is commenced. The engineer shall submit "as -built" plans prior to the acceptance of the improvements by the City. 7) Landscaping maintenance on Santa Rosa Way shall be provided by the property owner. 1.81 Complete grading .plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the City Engineer for checking and approval prior to issuance of any permits. 9) Dedication of 5 feet of right-of-way on Santa Rosa Way shall be done prior to issuance of any permits and approval of plans. 10) Installation of curb and gutter, matching paving and sidewalk on Santa Rosa. 11) Offsite improvement plans to be approved by Public Works Department and a surety posted to guarantee offsite improvements prior to building permit is- suance. 12) Size, number and location of driveways to Public Works specifications with only 1 driveway approach to be allowed to serve this property. 13) Parcel map waiver to be recorded prior to the grading permit issuance. Barry McClellan, P.E ARC:BM/lo phis plat was'` reparedYfraari'', record data only and dogs^!r.; � not represent`a surveyof� r,' the prooerty shown:hereon:,�'- 4b- This mao has been approve+! upon the expressed Conditioa �I that building pemits'.shail not be issued for any develop-. t� ` men't within this adjusWent pSat until necessary dedita Mons if any 'have o cmed • � 1 M PALMS �VILLAOE -� 1: PALM• VILL'A :QARDEWr yT."CT N0.2, , tiQ JRDEN� _-TRH ;22% 0; ' r•: �Ide•i c�G'L,'nt if,f Ik-4�i aA�dd�C '��t M W ni A a oil ' 6 8 12 i a o , w� o z, ' L �� U)7. . �•'sntEai _ - 25� V4.,„'SANT& .RASA WAY, '81T�, sso,Iaa•' i ti' LOCATION MAP W Q J LOT,' 12�,P.V O.TRACT� 627-101-027 LOTS, P. V.'0': Tf1; ,2 SANTA� RQ 'A WAY' 62T�101-025 Lot Nb.S, - 'Stri4t- flame. AR 'Nas AQ`JUS`T'MEN- _ PLA7 City . of:-PalrrE _ D:esert r Preperid by;Applicdnti: Approved by: WkLj1,*- SPENCE1c - .I?`0� BOX, 1441 a. } DIRECTOR'OF PUBIJC WORKS' :PALM ' DESERT, CALIF. RCE Na 2945S ' . . Iva DATE _LEGE October 26, 1984 CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE Case Nos. PP 84-44 and PMW 84-16 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by WILLIAM SPENCER for approval of a precise plan of design to allow construction of an eight (8) unit apartment complex --and a parcel map waiver to consolidate the existing two (2) lots into one lot for the R-2 zoned property located on the north side of Santa Rosa Way, 300 feet west of San Pascual Avenue, also described as: APN 627-101-026 and 027 SAID Public Hearing will be held on Tuesday, November 20, 1984, at 2:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber at the Palm Desert Civic Center, 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. PUBLISH: Desert Post November 9, 1984 AM RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary Palm Desert. Planning Commission INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM City of Palm Desert TO: Director of Environmental Services FROM: Director of Public Works SUBJECT: PP 84-44 William Spencer The following should be considered conditions of approval: DATE: October 5, 1984 1) Drainage and signalization fund fees, as required by City ordinance, shall be paid prior to building permit issuance. 2) Drainage facilities shall be provided, per Ordinance No. 218 and the Master Drainage Plan, to the specifications of the Director of Public Works. -3) Storm drain construction shall be contingent upon.a drainage study by the private engineer that is approved by the Department of Public Works. 4)" Full public improvements, including traffic safety lighting, as required by ordinance and the Director of Public Works, shall be installed in accord- ance with City standards. 5) Complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the City Engineer for checking and approval before construc- tion of any improvements is commenced. The engineer shall submit "as -built" plans prior to the acceptance of the improvements by the City. (p 7) Landscaping maintenance on Santa Rosa Way shall be provided by the property owner. 81 Complete grading plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the City Engineer for checking and approval prior to issuance of any permits. 9) Dedication of 5 feet of right-of-way on Santa Rosa Way shall be done prior to issuance of any permits and approval of plans. YO) Installation of curb and gutter, matching paving and sidewalk on Santa Rosa. 11) Offsite improvement plans to be approved by Public Works Department and a surety posted to guarantee offsite improvements prior to building permit is- suance. 12) Size, number and location of driveways to Public Works specifications with only 1 driveway approach to be allowed to serve this property. :j° A 13) Parcel map waiver to be recorded prior to the grading permit issuance Barry McClellan, P.E. ARC:BM/lo r) Palm Adlerf UVafer & Serviced A.4trict 44.500 PORTOLA AVENUE BOX 161 PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92261 BOARD OF DIRECTORS: ROBERT C. H. LAWMAN, President R. CLAIR McDONOUGH rst SHARON K. EPPS PHYLLIS GRIGGS, District Secretary Mr. Ramon Diaz Director, Environmental Services City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, California 92260 Re: Case No. 84-44, PMW 84-16, William Spencer 7-Unit Apartment Complex, Santa Rose Way 300' West of San Pasqual Avenue, Lot 5 Palm Village Garden Tract No. 2 and Lot 12 Palm Village Garden Tract Dear Mr. Diaz: Phone: (619) 346.6336 In response to your letter regarding the above referenced project, we would like to make the following comments: 1. Frontage fee of $12.00 per foot will be imposed along Santa Rosa Way. 2. The District will install a 1z-inch water meter at the cost of $1,150. 3. The water service installation charges will be as follows: One 1?-inch water meter @ $1,150/each $1,150 Frontage Fee of 172 feet @ $12.00/Ft 2;064 .TOTAL 3,214 4. All fees'and other charges must be paid before the installation work will begin. 5. At least one week advance notice should be given. 6. There is an existing fire hydrant on the project site between Lot 5 and Lot 12. The addition of any new fire hydrants or relocation of any existing, if required by the City Fire Marshall would be completed at the owner's expense. The cost of any hydrant improvements would be furnished by the District upon request. Mr. Ramon Diaz October 11, 1984 Page 2 7. A fire sprinkler service connection, if fire sprinklers are required by the City Fire Marshall, would be completed at an additional charge and conditions to be determined upon request and according to the District's standards. 8. The District owns and maintains a 4-inch steel water main which is located on the lot line between Lot 5 and`Lot 12. Before the District can give approval more detailed building plans (i.e. footing and other foundation plans) will have to be submitted to the District along with a copy of the preliminary title report for the property. The owner will have to make additional improvememts to the water main to protect it during and after construction. The extent of those improvements will be determined upon receipt of the information requested above. 9. The owner will also sign an agreement with the District releasing the District from responsibility for the removal of improvements should maintenance or repair on the 4-inch water main be necessary in the future. If you have any questions in regard to the above, please contact US. Very truly yours, PALM DESERT WATER AND SERVICES DISTRICT ROBERT C.H. LAWMAN, President RCHL:DGS:dm s RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT IN COOPERATION WITH THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY RAY HEBRARD FIRE CHIEF October 15, 1984 Ramon Diaz City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 Reference: No. PP 84-44, PMW 84-16, Applicant Dear Mr. Diaz, 210 WEST SAN JACINTO AVENUE PERRIS, CALIFORNIA 92370 TELEPHONE: (714) 657.3183 RANCHO MIRAGE FIRE STATION 70-800 HIGHWAY 111 RANCHO MIRAGE, CA 9&70 William Spencer The following fire protection requirements are in accordance with the Uniform Fire Code and Life Safety Code standards. 1. Install a water system capable of delivering 2500 GPM fire flow from any fire hydrant for a 2 hour duration in addition to domestic supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement. Fire flow requirements will depend on built-in fire pro- tection provisions of buildings. 2. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants so that no point of any building is more than 250 feet from a fire hydrant measured along approved vehicular travel ways. a;,, exterior surface of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow, � and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. b. curbs shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. c. hydrants shall not be located closer than 25 feet to any building. 3. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and approved by the water company with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system in PP 84-44, PMW 84416 is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Fire Marshal." 4. Prior to delivery of combustible materials to the building site, the required water system shall be installed, operating and delivering the required flow. 5. Wrought iron gate on south elevation to have gates for emergency access. 6. Fire lanes will be required. 7. Additional fire protection requirements may be necessary when the applicant submits specific plans for consideration and approval. Very truly yours, RAY HEBRARD Fire Chief By, MIKE MCCONNELL dpm Fire Marshal cc: Bob Maini_ero PDWSD z ESTABLISHED IN 1918 AS A PUBLIC AGENCY COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT POST OFFICE BOX 1056 • COACHELLA, CALIFORNIA 92236 • TELEPHONE (619) 398-2651 DIRECTORS OFFICERS RAYMOND R. RUMMONDS, PRESIDENT LOWELLO. WEEKS, GENERAL MANAGER -CHIEF ENGINEER TELLISCODEKAS, VICE PRESIDENT October 12, 1984 BERNARDINE SUTTON, SECRETARY JOHN P. POW ELL REDW INE AND SHERRILL, ATTORNEYS PAUL W. NICHOLS STEVE D. BUXTON File: 0163.11 0421.1 0721.1 Department of Environmental Services City of Palm Desert E'":P2CP: hLN p! S, Post Office Box 1977 GtiC OF PA:f,-i Palm Desert, California 92261 Gentlemen: Subject: Precise Plan 84-44 and Parcel Map Waiver 84-16, Portion of NE'k, Section 20, T5S, R6E, S.B.M. This area is protected from stormwater flows by a system of channels and dikes, and may be considered safe from stormwater flows except in rare instances. This area is shown to be subject to shallow flooding and is designated Zone AO, depth one foot on Federal Flood Insurance rate maps which are in effect at this time. However, we expect the map to be revised due to the construction of the Palm Valley Stormwater Channel. The District will furnish sanitation service to this area in accordance with the current regulations of this District. This area shall be annexed to Improvement District Nos. 54 and 80 of Coachella Valley Water District for sanitation service. Yours very truly, .sril.G�L4� , Lowell 0. Weeks General Manager -Chief Engineer CS:ra cc: Riverside County Department of Public Health, Indio TRUE CONSERVATION USE WATER WISELY 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 NEGATIVE DECLARATION (Pursuant to Title 14, Division 6, Article 7, Section 15083, of the California Administrative Code) Common Project Case No: PP 84-44 and PMW 84-16 Name (if any) Spencer Apartment Complex Applicant/Project Sponsor: William Spencer, P.O. Box 144, Palm Desert, CA 92261 Project Description/Location: construction of eight (8) apartment units on a 26,476 foot lot. The Directoryof the Department of Environmental Services, City of Palm Desert, California, has found that the described project will not have a significant effect on the environment. A copy of the initial study has been attached to document the reasons in support of this finding. Mitigation measures, if any, included in the project to avoid potentially significant effects, may also be.found attached. RAMON A. DIAZ DATE Director of Environmental Services l` CASE NO. PP$y_yy+p 0 yv i6 rr� ���E tie r• t. tNVIROn1tXTAL SERVICES DEPT. INITIAL STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION CHECKLIST NOTE: The availability of data necessary to address the topics listed below shall form the basis of a decision as to whether the application is considered complete for purposes of environmental assessment. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers, possible mitigation measures and comments are provided on attached sheets). Yes Maybe No 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: _ a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? — -- — b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction, or overcovering of the soil? — — — c. Change in topography or ground surface relief / features? d. The destruction, covering, or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e. _ Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? t/ 2. Air. _ Will the proposal result in: — a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors? c. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any change in climate, / either locally or regionally? _ _✓ f Zr Yes Maybe No 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: a,...Changes in currents,`or the course or 4- direction of water'movements? b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, the rate and amount of surface water r runoff? c. Alterations to the course or flow of — —; flood waters? d. Alteration of -the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? e. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or with- drawals, or through interception of an / aquifer by cuts or excavations? f. Reduction in the amount of water other- wise available for public water supplies? 4. Plant Life. Will the -proposal result in: r a. Change in the diversity of species, or .numbers of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs,grass, and crops)? I/ b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or endangered species of plants? , c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal / replenishment of existing species? v 5. Animal. Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, or insects)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique; / rare, or endangered species of animals? c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier.to / the migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration to existing wildlife '' habitat? ✓ 6. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in :the rate of use of any natural resources? r b. Depletion ofiany non-renewable natural resource? 7. Energv. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? b. Demand upon existing sources of energy, or re- quire the development of new sources of energy? 8. Risk of Upset_�4"oes the proposal involve a n sk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, pesticides, oil, chemicals, or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? 'c 9. Economic Loss. Will the proposal result in: :i a. A change in the value of property and improvements endangered by flooding? t b. A change in the value of property and improvementsrexposed to geologic hazards beyond accepted community risk standards? 10. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels toethe point at which accepted community noise and vibration levels are exceeded? i 11. Land Use. Willethe proposal result in the iteration of the present developed or planned land use of an area? 12. Open Space. Will the proposal lead to a decrease in theremount of designated open space? 13. Population. Will the proposal result in: a. Alteration 0the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human Population of -the Citv? b. Change in the population distribution by age, income,=religion, racial, or ethnic group, occupational class, household type? 3. Yes Mn1be No V V V V 4. Yes Maybe No 14. Emoloyment. Will the proposal result in additional new long-term jobs provided, or a change in the number and per cent employed, unemployed, and underemployed? 15. Housing. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in number and per cent of housing units by type (price or rent range, zoning category, owner -occupied and rental, etc.) relative to demand or to number of / families in various income classes in the City? b. Impacts on existing housing or creation of a / demand for additional housing? 16. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in. a. Generation of additional vehicular movement? b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? C. Impact upon existing transportation systems? _ — d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? — e. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists, or pedestrians? 17. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for, new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a. fire protection? b. Police protection? c. Schools? d. Parks or other recreational facilities? / e. Maintenance of public facilities, including /✓ roads? _ f. Other governmental services? J S. Yes Maybe No 18. Public Fiscal Balance. Will the proposal result in a net change in government fiscal flow (revenues less operating expenditures and annualized capital expenditures)? 19. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: a: -Power or natural gas? b. Communications system? C. Water? _ ✓ d. Sewer or septic tanks? V/ e. Storm water drainage? f. Solid waste and disposal? J 20. Human Health. Will the proposal result in: a. The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? b. A change in the level of community health care provided? 21. Social Services. Will the proposal result in _ an increased demand for provision of general _ social services? 22. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in: a. Obstruction of any scenic vista or view / open to the public? ✓/ b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? v .c. Lessening of the overall neighborhood (or area) attractiveness, pleasantness, / and uniqueness? ✓ 23. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce ne.v igh-1 t or glare? 24. Archeological/,yistorical. Will the proposal resu t in an a teerat on of a 'significant archeological or historical site, structure, object, or building? 6. Yes aL a No 25. Mandatory Findings of Significance. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment or to curtail the diversity in the environment? b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) c. Does the project have impacts which are indi- vidually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? _ I Initial Study Prepared By: s oC / 77`vCt -- 2 V/ J I October 26, 1984 CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE Case Nos. PP 84-44 and PMW 84-16 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by WILLIAM SPENCER for approval of a precise plan of design to allow construction of an eight (8) unit apartment complex and a parcel map waiver to consolidate the existing two (2) lots into one lot for the R-2 zoned property located on the north side of Santa Rosa Way, 300 feet west of San Pascual Avenue, also described as: APN 627-101-026 and 027 SAID Public Hearing will be held on Tuesday, November 20, 1984, at 2.00 p.m. in the Council Chamber at the Palm Desert Civic Center, 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary Palm Desert Planning Commission PUBLISH: Desert Post November 9, 1984 Am 41 'C--lUtI270 T off 1lPas� �® 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND CONDMONS OF APPROVAL CASE NOW: %?f? �✓ y_ 417 PROJECT: —�— APPLICANT: Enclosed please find materials describing a project for which the following is being requested: /1VI--vamL p� �v1.t'�✓�T/O�/ e,,— /�fAIPT�fJEtiT �.D.ypGCx sr/.P%2dlsv/ZYivcr/ F%✓ �X/ST/n/� my T� /l/OlzTf/ Si�� Of f�y�vi�a X�SA s✓�vy 300 Fc4T .- -q The attached data was prepared by the applicant and is being forwarded to you for comments and recommended conditlons of approval. The city is Interested In the probable impacts on the environment (including land, air, water, minerals, flora, fauna, noise objects of historical or aesthetic significance) and recommended conditions of approval based on your expertise and area of concern. Your comments and recommended conditions of approval must be received by this office prior to S:30 A-m. lQ-/S , in order to be discussed by the land division committee. a land division committee (comprised of director of environmental services, city building official, city engineer, fire marshal and a representative of CVWD) will discuss the comments and recommended conditions of approval and will forward them to the planning commission through the staff report. Any information received by this office after the receipt deadline will not be discussed by the land division committee. Sincerely, RAMON A. DIAZ DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES RD/lr Attachments U tom_ r-- Ln b li 4 ] a 3AV 4 4 oe 7C'nOSdd- N6'S- 1� U>w ' U V V 4 >' o1i .., Nam• 1 6 , • � i m w <U � J y ^If / V m OQ\O � O: o O b b O O ©p b ] F ® Y -�-a t tl ��/�V yr.le, ro.v Q N � N m m V d R 1 J V NVS J," 71I IIf y �11 | i I it .j 'I �i j \� \ � \ e ( I \} \j I f a Ill •e � \ e — / Q � 1 � J I 1 --- --- ---- Fn"["T-. ... - -- e -- _ VWIT I p YN�f-L _ I C fyp[ ISr 30. (xre� ln0 18 nner[ sl. Znixl III N_. II 11x P19i65ort �_-- �y} u s � �r -- InlR o51 11 .CRE I 1 —I J' 9.1 is 6 VNT�, 9 kBuvFTT�A9n o (TV) ^,-./ - ( .J rr sL,LNa— tnx OSCn l2 u[p r s�o' Sc •T'nu _CAL GAS f0_ n cSCR VT OX S1LL'UxlrxL 4nNoF _Snm_ _ wLL>—¢ mrs s. L �x o2r/ so ZONE d Z 4000 _ x„r s eras so:r or unr.. >oes LIL1—sLLF.LJ..iaB A A YiS gF sTNni•se l$9f sort LAApo�r 1L8o 53 (* !1 NC Tern 9x sL SO Ff ne [pum. "-I 'A Pevro weF• AH2 so Fr 215� rccc e o so Fr-Ar9Y, CAfteutlL_(3E0_A l�vAe^ _ AWN— PARx Nb AYq L A lev OV nR. 9 Cityof Palm Desert San Pablo Properties Ltd. Cerecedes, Thomas R. eta 950 Server Ave. 45275 Prickly Pear Lane 400 N. Tustin Ave. # 231 Los Angeles, Ca. 90022 Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 Santa Anay Ca. 92703 1 2 3 Muller, Witold Contreras, Catalina Holt, Otto stal 801 S. Garfield #107 73689 Avenue 44 70966 La Paz Alhambra, Ca. 91801 Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 Rancho Mirage, Ca. 92270 4 5 6 Cordova, Robert I. etal 6 Cadiz 1 / ro� 318Yan Burs William 318 Buren:.Rancho Mirage, Ca. 92270 / // pan Topeka, KS. 66603 7 /y 12 Spencer, William G. stal Davis, Allen F. Jr. etal Manning, Ronald D. P.O. Box 144 881 Calla Paul. 44170 E1 Cercado St. Palm desert, Ca. 92260 Palm Springs, Ca. 92262 Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 10 11 15 Rimer, Karl Fairbanks, Ronald Grey Valdez, Jesse F. etal 5319 Hillmont 73605 Santa Rosa Way 44215 San Pasqual Ave. Los Angeles, Ca. 90041 Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 13 14 18 Stoltzman, David H. etal Anderholt, J. John stal Reimer, Bruce J. P.O. Box 2096 P.O. Box 789 P.O. Box 1087 Palm Desert, Ca. 92261 Palm Desert, Ca. 92261 Palm Springs, Ca. 92262 16 17 21 Gaddis, Martha Wood, Richard J. NALICK, ALBERT 73340 Catalin Way P.O. Box 2193 347 Peek Dr. Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 Palm Desert, Ca. 92261 Beverly Hills, Ca. 19 90212 20 8 /4 e � �^ MAGNESIA FALLS AVENUE e •wseno <..< r. D p � < <n 3 m°a So y D I Por. P4<4 <m `O O 2210ACS q 4TNT �R u y a Poc L4/l •„ 2 5 42441 !ram n oz i LOI J Z. 30Acf La d/ 19O9Acf /6 k � m L4r do 0 } m579Ac I mi revs A� ~ � O�n o�y 0 ba Pa. z ` 97ox 61 `s t ..ee,•o • ''R� �� ip i° 1 011__ dGaII �. a 4O4Ac Gi L -lo /B n "q V 2 I �KRUG AVE ni i 1 SO Ac: v L �i rl y fl • 1 III I RANCHO RD. r r I a r � 0 I. WAR/NG-...... B/r. f�jry 627 ' ' wo• � tV STATEA.,.4TS SUPPORTING THE REQUE5%L PRECISE PLAN (13 Copies) Please state why the proposed precise plan should be approved based upon public necessity, general welfare, or good zoning practice. THE NEED FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING IN THE AREA. .ACT LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF P[.JPERTY (S Copies) PALM VILLAGE GARDEN TRACT UNIT-2 IA T 5 MAP BOOK 022/050 UNIT-2 LOT-i2 MAP Legal Description Approved by: Date: BOOK 022/050 r 5 F. R7 FORK a®. S �PJ2�Gi� Pi.�l liam 5 eneer mnt) 346-5779 - Box 1LLli Palm Desert Telephone re" Palm Desert if. o_puEST' ; Describe specific nature of approval requested I. Const'ruetion of seven a artment units r i PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: alm V Unit-2 Lot-12 MB Unit-2 Lot-12 MB 022/050 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL N0. EXISTING ZONING R-2-4000 -- auMor- The undersigned slates that they are the owner Is) or ization for the fifn� at this application. property 1 hereby gtva semen! absolving the City o! Polm Doss of all liabilities relative to any deed res.ncnv�,.. DO BY MY SIGNATURE ON THIS AGREEMENT, Absolvey be applicabletyoflla me propersert of ty desliaboriiWd�herein.any deed restrictions that Applicant's Signature )R STAFF USE ONLY) Environmental Status ❑ Ministerial Act E.A. No. ❑ Categorical Exemption ❑ Negative Declaration ❑ Other Accepted by: Reference Case No. 9 1 "i 811 - Date 9-13-84 Date ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT RELATING TO TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF AN 8 UNIT APARTMENT PROJECT CONTAINING 2 UNITS AFFORDABLE BY MODERATE INCOME HOUSEHOLDS. RELATED CASE NO. PP 84-44 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 27th day of December, 1984, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider a request by WILLIAM SPENCER for approval of a development agree- ment specifying terms and conditions for the management of an 8 unit apart- ment project containing 2 "moderate affordable" units to be developed under the density bonus provisions of Section 65915 of the California State Government Code. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, by Resolution No. 1010 has recommended approval; WHEREAS, said application has complied with requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedures to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 80-89", in that the director of environmental services had determined the project has been previously assessed in connection with PP 84-44 for which a negative declaration of environmental impact has been certified. WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering the testi- mony and arguments of all persons desiring to be heard, said city council did find the following facts to justify its action as described below: 1. The development agreement is consistent with the general plan, zoning ordinance and specifically implements policies contained within the housing element. 2. The proposed agreement complies with Section 65915 of the California Government Code. The City Council of the City of Palm Desert, California, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the city council in this case. 2. That it does hereby approve the Spencer Development Agreement labeled in Exhibit "A". 3. The city clerk is directed to publish this ordinance once in the Palm Desert Post, a newspaper of general circulation, published and circulated in the city of Palm Desert, and shall certify to the passage of adoption of this ordinance, shall submit the agreement to the Riverside County Recorder for recordation, and the same shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its adoption. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Palm Desert, California, held on the day of 1984, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: WALTER H. SNYDER, Mayor r _LEGE NOVEMBER 27, 1984 CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE CASE: SPENCER DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held before the Palm Desert City Council to consider a request by WILLIAM SPENCER for approval of a development agreement specifying terms and conditions for the management of an 8 unit apartment complex which will include 2 units affordable by moderate income households, located on the north side of Santa Rosa Way, 300 feet west of San Pascual, more particularly described as: / APN 627-101-026 and 101-027 SAID public hearing will be held on December 27, 1984, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber at the Palm Desert Civic Center, 73-510 Fred Waging Drive, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. PUBLISH: Desert Post December 14, 1984 SHEILA R. GILLIGAN, City Clerk' - City of Palm Desert, California Y-■ • r•t M' I •• la w �1 �.E1 l��/ " � '� a • r u oaa •• la w •I 91• 91A 0 M ■ t • •1, 01 v vAAkw IaaY'a• •I• 7 r •a �i •• r DIY r:■rY •r • u,tr. u r ■ r ti � i rY r an r•r r • ■ 'ems u I ■' I. M/ QM , SR. OF BUILDING 6 SAFETY 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NON: �, / 9y- 417 PROJECT: APPLICANT:/LL��y� SyEyEE� Enclosed please find materials describing a project for which the following Is being requested: /�/'jd/Ipl�/aL p� �ti.!'.r�✓�/O.t/ O� /! S�!/E2 !/.riiT ��IPT�GJEtiT C�-ypLCx s�.P%2dc�t/,ZYtii� �%✓ �ti�LE f�1 r�J/L�/ TzEsidL�YG� !it/ i� Z �oniE �OG9 TEI� my TE i!%OI?Tf/ Si1� 4F S�tii� R�fq sr/.9j� 3fX� �C4T wESr dF � �� The attached data was prepared by the applicant and is being forwarded to11 you for comments and recommended conditions of approval. The city is Interested In the probable impacts on the environment (including land, air, water, minerals, flora, fauna, noise objects of historical or aesthetic significance) and recommended conditions of approval based on your expertise and area of concern. Your comments and recommended conditions of approval must be received by this office prior to V:30 A-m. l0-/5 , in order to be discussed by the land division committee. a land division committee (comprised of director of environmental services, city building official, city engineer, fire marshal and a representative of CVWD) will discuss the comments and recommended conditions of approval and will forward them to the planning commission through the staff report. Any information received by thls office after the receipt deadline will not be discussed by the land division committee. Sincerely, RAMON A. DIAZ DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES RD/lr Attachments r' j.. 627— /O W.A. /602, 1512. 1L1 � •, ; �/ shK/ , a z POR. N112 N,-//4 SEC. 20, T- 5S., .R- 6E BK 622 - ere erc O f 4 1 4 J I /S /J ca.. e'�xI• ... a .. �O� .. �. Q naa le• /S 1 ? 4 ro 9 B I '7 I 6 J Q 11 16 , /B A �•_ <\JI O 4, T to • •PVGS PVLr-Z •` 1'� u'6 PVL T-71 PV6T .. . ♦ >•o ..r v PVLT PV .I PV.G. - Iiii mwPVG 2 O J Y i O O z (02 /02 5 O O 4 I y MB. 2 151 Po/ma Villoge Groves A(S 2//56-57 Palm Village Garden 7rac/ MB. 22150 I na 2 M8110113-14 Say No. 15384(C.M 29//44-1461 ASSESSOR'S MAP SA'. 627 PC /O f(POKTYAA 9 E�Sr ftf�r$ON VIE Si ELEVf nau - N C ATA F LF VA7 rC A - — --AOOTH ELEVAT, ON 1-111A�l 1-1. �11�1 I-'- --][--Trl- FLj--- \ -jil V�' L L I Ad 0 1 lop 0 � I SANTF N0.5).yr.1—_ _ _ar.ai[a y.T- I — ACAS &A (1-- I ZONE R 1 4000 LAAPORr ALSO zAFr, 1.1w1 PAMN, AY. -I H W. 9—WO1 October 26, 1984 CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE Case Nos. PP 84-44 and PMW 84-16 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by WILLIAM SPENCER for approval. of a precise plan of design to allow construction of an eight (8) unit apartment complex --and a parcel map waiver to consolidate the existing two (2) lots into one lot for the R-2 zoned property located on the north side of Santa Rosa Way, 300 feet west of San Pascual Avenue, also described as: APN 627-101-026 and 027 SAID Public Hearing will be held on Tuesday, November 20, 1984, at 2:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber at the Palm Desert Civic Center, 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary Palm Desert Planning Commission PUBLISH: Desert Post November 9, 1984 Am NOV POST OFFICE BOX.1977, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92261 Fairbanks, Ronald Grey 73605 Santa Rosa W. Palm Desert, CA 92260 INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM _ City of Palm Desert OCT 3 0 19r " TO: Director of Environmental Services ENVIRONMENTAL SE,V.,,,. FROM: Director of Public Works ',Tv of PALM SUBJECT: PP 84-44 William Spencer DATE: October 5, 1984 The following,should be considered conditions of approval: 1) Drainage and signalization fund fees, as required by City ordinance, shall be paid prior to building permit issuance. 2) Drainage facilities shall be provided, per Ordinance.No. 218 and the Master Drainage Plan, to the specifications of the Director of Public Works. 3) Storm drain construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study by the private engineer that is approved by the Department of Public Works. 4) Full public improvements, including traffic safety lighting, as required by ordinance and the Director of Public Works, shall be installed in accord- ance with City standards. 5) Complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the City Engineer for checking and approval before construc- tion of any improvements is commenced. The engineer shall submit "as -built" plans prior to the acceptance of the improvements by the City. 7) Landscaping maintenance on Santa Rosa Way shall be provided by the property owner. 8) Complete grading plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the City Engineer for checking and approval prior to issuance of any permits. 9) Dedication of 5 feet of right-of-way on Santa Rosa Way shall be done prior to issuance of any permits and approval of plans. 10) Installation of curb and gutter, matching paving and sidewalk on Santa Rosa. 11) Offsite improvement plans to be approved by Public Works Department and a surety posted to guarantee offsite improvements prior to building permit is- suance. 12) Size, number and location of driveways to Public Works specifications with only 1 driveway approach to be allowed to serve this property. 13) Parcel map waiver to be recorded prior to the grading permit issuance. B�C 1� n ARC:BM/lo rc.a. laoz.la/z POR. N//2 N/-//4 SEC. 20, T. 5S., .R. 6E. BK 0 aa® P.YG PVa T-2 l•• I y / E F O 6 ® ® l2 / .. ., /0/ t •PVGT • /•/• _ PVGT-2-SA�i4---R8. u'E PY6 T-N O� io3 �cm ' � � �� , �'✓ `etc; Oj ®. \�. � toiAc• O /02 /02 Q sQ ! !z �1 t' MS. M151 Polm ✓illoge Groves // M6 21/56-57 Polm ✓iliage Gorden T7acl M.B. 22150 no. 2 - MH110/13-14 Fxl No. 15364(C.M 291144-146) 577 IT �t © h Q ASSESSOR'S MAP 5K. 627 PC 10 MEMORANDUM CITY OF PALM DESERT TO: Honorable Mavor and Citv Council FROM: Director of Community Development/Planning DATE: September 12, 1985 SUBJECT: PP 84-44 Spencer Development Agreement Mr. Spencer is reauesting an additional 90 day continuance of the action on the development agreement. He is presently reassessing the use of his property relative to the policy recommendations of the Palma Village Specific Plan: specifically the potential for senior housing. RECOMMENDATION: Continue item until November 14. 1985. 1 ORDINANCE NO. EXHIBIT "A" WILLIAM SPENCER AFFORDABLE HOUSING AGREEMENT This agreement, made as of this _ day of 1984, between the City of Palm Desert, a California municipal corporation (hereinafter "CITY") and William Spencer, (hereinafter "DEVELOPER") provides: Recitals 1. DEVELOPER is owner of certain real property located within the City of Palm Desert, California, which property is described in Exhibit 1, attached hereto and made a part hereof (hereinafter "PROPERTY"). DEVELOPER has applied for and received approval of a precise plan (PP 84-44) to construct eight residential rental units on the PROPERTY 2. As a condition of said approvals, CITY has required that one unit within Precise Plan 84-44 (hereinafter "PROJECT") would be set aside for lower income occupants subject to restrictions necessary to insure the continued occupancy of said units by lower income households. 3. DEVELOPER and CITY desire to further memorialize and implement the conditions of said approval and do hereby agree to the following terms and conditions. Agreement 1. DEVELOPER has been conditionally granted permission by the CITY to construct eight rental residential units on the PROPERTY by Precise Plan and Planning Commission Resolution No. 1010. As a condition of said approvals DEVELOPER is required, and hereby agrees to reserve for rent one unit for lower income households. Hereinafter this unit shall be referred to as "AFFORDABLE UNIT". This AFFORDABLE UNIT shall consist of a two bedroom unit. 0 ORDINANCE NO. 2. As used herein, "lower income households" shall refer to families or individuals whose gross income is between 50% and 80% of the Riverside County median income based upon financial and demographic information received from the United States Department of Housing and Community Development (HUD) or its successor agency. This information is contained in "Exhibit 2" and shall be updated automatically as information is obtained from HUD. If in the future more relevant data is made available by other officially recognized agencies, the applicant may request amendment of this agreement to include such data. 3. Rents for the affordable unit shall be based upon 30% of the maximum gross monthly income for households earning 60% of the Riverside County Median. 1 - 2 bedroom $350 4. The DEVELOPER or his assigned management agent shall be responsible for determining elgibility of prospective tenants. Prior to opening the project the DEVELOPER shall submit for approval a plan to the CITY describing the procedure for determining and enforcing eligibility requirements. This plan shall include annual qualification by all eligible households and a semi- annual audit at the DEVELOPER'S cost by the CITY or its assigned agents determining compliance with all aspects of this agreement. 5. The DEVELOPER shall not discriminate on the basis of race, creed, sex, national origin, or age. The AFFORDABLE UNIT shall be equipped in the same fashion and their exterior shall be identical in quality and desirability as other units in the project. The AFFORDABLE UNIT shall be evenly dispersed throughout the project. The exact location of the AFFORDABLE UNIT shall be changed from time to time as vacancies permit. 6. The DEVELOPER shall maintain the quality of the buildings, grounds and recreation facilities consistent with their condition at the time of issuance a ORDINANCE NO. of certificate of occupancy. The DEVELOPER shall post a $2,500 bond or other satisfactory security assuring the performance of any work the CITY feels is necessary to meet this requirement in a form satisfactory to the CITY. 7. The term of this agreement shall run for thirty years during which period the aforementioned AFFORDABLE UNIT shall be reserved for lower income households. This agreement has been prepared based on the premise that the PROJECT will be operated as rental housing. The DEVELOPER or his successor may apply to amend this agreement to allow condominium conversion. The DEVELOPER will be required to conform to all applicable zoning and building regulations. The amendment would include a program to maintain the availability of the AFFORDABLE UNIT for lower income households throughout the remaining term of the agreement. 8. The provisions of this agreement shall run with, burden and bind the DEVELOPER and his successors. The provisions hereof shall be enforceable by appropriate legal action brought by the CITY. In the event legal action is brought to enforce any provision hereof, the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorney's fees together with other legally allowable costs. 9. This agreement shall be reviewed by the CITY planning commission every 6 months, at which time the applicant or his successor shall be required to demonstrate good faith compliance with the terms of the agreement. If as a result of this review, the commission finds and determines, on the basis of substantial evidence, that the applicant has not complied in good faith with terms or conditions of the agreement, it shall recommend to the city council that the agreement be modified or terminated. If the city council concurs with the planning commission recommendation the agreement shall be modified or terminated. Proceeding before the city council shall be a noticed public hearing. If at the time of the hearings substantial improvements have not yet occurred on the site, termination of the AGREEMENT will also involve revocation of all previous approvals and permits associated herewith and the zoning of the property shall revert to ORDINANCE NO. R-2. If substantial improvements are already in place and modifications acceptable to the CITY cannot be negotiated then enforcement of provisions of this agreement shall be pursued through legal action per No. 8 of this AGREEMENT. 10. The AGREEMENT shall be construed according to the laws of the State of California. If any portion of the AGREEMENT is for any reason held to be unenforceable, such determination shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions. 11. Each of the parties hereto covenants and agrees that it has the legal capacity to make the AGREEMENTS herein contained, that each AGREEMENT is binding upon that party and that this AGREEMENT is executed by a duly authorized official acting in his official capacity. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have executed this Agreement the year and date first above written. THE CITY OF PALM DESERT DEVELOPER WILLIAM SPENCER (Notarized) ATTEST: ORDINANCE NO. EXHIBIT "1" PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Lots 12 and 5 Palma Village Garden, Tract 2 M.B. 022/050 ORDINANCE NO. EXHIBIT "2" INCOME LIMITS LOWER INCOME Persons in the Family 80 PERCENT 60 PERCENT Definition: Lower Income: 50 PERCENT $18,700 $14,000 $11,700 Households earning between 50% and 80% of the Riverside County Median. 1'ID' • '11 la •I ■ ■ ■ � � (-/—r (C) �.lJt t' S C Kam{ C�IJ �C _ tfk NS CS�"T 9u � f3%, Mom[ BE= ANY F CMMMS CAN BE KAXE, AD MMIAL WOMM= IS NE= FM mil... fa2-T ARCEMMCTURAL rRAWnES AND SPECg"LCATICNS ®� CMT x-rs SnWCnT-41 DRA M= AND CM rM=lS Cf2m= H.V.A.C. , ELZ=C.AL AND PLIgS= PLANS & SPECMZATM S C IR= T= 24 EI= CCLSFiiVAT=l MCUgMMIZC£Q Q CCbR= G3RAME PLANS •jam Ct�t JOE , SR. ➢ATE D"IRFICTOR OF BUILDING & SAFETY November 17,1985 Planning Commission: City of Palm Desert: Please cancel my application for a development agree- ment with the City of Palm Desert. Thank you. Sine -;rely, j Wile am G. Spencer --ili VAN VNIN b. ki _4m -7. Ap ­1 w" 6�, A ZIC '�qj ml Ulm M I 71 NOW Wli= A _W SAM At '441 lqwl:� , IIII[VA f lillirimb� WIN Uifl ZI II I :.'Al� A Iffi-7 �Arl I 7 "llk"T 'lie 16 1 1 All- 41 W_q I 'A Ia in w �lv 9 1* �! P 400G JLPF ; "l-M A Z 'POW —Mqlmw "AA "I 4AM jbi� 4� 1. t, MW 'Oil Odom IMPOWIMM"7777. 7. ­7 i3ft Ad *"iALfgLl?LhL& a k. -J, X j4� 7­� W MWAMM 4 MOO A T11 07 IL F;;FTjr f. -Vovaj� Aw,� lob am OR mlawo� wool*. — 4k* mi -4W TILE ROOF A. OU S"A rAi*MWM 'NNW 70 �T.77"� Fw7p thoyr Tvwwwmmp�- I - ftllj� VIP N_!� io 49Z A 1 -0 ftgz 51-UGGO UYPIGAL) NMI .1 re. ,3,�N Ar ML lk W -ddlL 50 IV PAM rA YA "Wills A �lvdlo Vj&.l .7o — I M I -,= I -=I — 11 M nj 0 0, loj, = I = 0 1 4 M W "% 0 i IN IF A V __`W A'J,� il VA W=J =.J:4 0 1 vHA = - � � A V_ A 0 =:� r GENERAL NOTES °i 1. All grading to be done in accordance with the City of Pals Drsezt Grading /^E1CiST. iY000 FENCE '1 :� t� Ordinance. r •' f� —a4--- i� .x ._,X - -9 \ P. U.E. Oil 2. This Plan is for grading purposes ONLY. Issuance of a a •' \' 3 N89� 4s'E 86.0o Pv E. NB9 46 'E 86. oa p 9 g purpo grading permit based r on this plan does not constitute approval of driveway locations and sizes, ,cs►� q $ 5' 5' parking layout, building locations, off - site drainage facilities, or other W. M items not related directly.ep the basic grading operation. O j T 2.O r� a PP P :� 3. A letter of certification from the Engineer - of - York stating that the R.W. grading has been completed per the approved plan, and a compaction report --�- -- -_ -* - -mac- from a Soils Engineer on all fill areas are required prior to the building �uRg XO Qp,permit issuance. 5 OPEN/NG Xovv � tor✓' FLow_ FLolf-_ ,p0• T v/ �% 4. All retaining walls shown on these plans that require structural approval x14 (� I ' \(1� ExiST, shall be issued a separate permit and be inspected by the Building Depart- Q% ( LOT BLOCA- WgLL went to construct these malls. 10 5. The issuance of the retaining wall permit must be done PRIOR to issuing . i the Building permit. b. The Engineer of - York shall be notified when construction has commenced.LCT 5 �' ) 7. in the event of discrepancies and/or deviations arising during construction, OEEP�NEO i the Engineer - of - Work shall be responsible for determining an acceptable Foo7"j�yG solution and revising the plans for approval by the Department of Public %�( Works. to �L /O, Q% )) 8. The contractor shall be responsible for all damages to onsite, offsite and FF /0/ , g \ adjacent utilities, facilities, and properties. ~ (0 I 101.3 9. The contractor shall take all notes pope p protect adjacent property owners from any and alldamagethat any occur from storm water runoff and/or deposition of debris resulting from any and all work in conjunction with construction of these grading plans. exI57- 10. The contractor shall notify the Department of Public Yorks (619) 346-0611, �S ryJ m at least 48 hours PRIOR to commencing any work. w BtocK 4 �QP' bT� z6 -- - p / ,I 11. The contractor shall be responsible for the location and protection of all J 6 ` p O 01•6 ` �'' h i utilities. For the location of underground utilities, or for emergency ¢ -cC assistance call: O• I I \ oO Z Ex/5T. WG'X�O FENCE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 346-3720 Q Tb BE REMOYEO� j SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS 347-6187 V GENERAL 71LEPHONE CO. 36 7- 2 711 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 398-2651 PALM DESERT WATER DEPARTMENT 346-6338 W a 2 cOACKELU1 VALLEY TELEVISION 340-2225 12. All property .corners shall be undisturbed by the grading of these improve- � 1 �o � j 1 ��o t . POOL AREq , ments and the contractor shall be responsible for the restoration of all F ( lost of obliterated monuments, as specified by the Subdivision Map Act. COP/NG AT /O/. 6 N p 13. These plans mAy be subject to review and/or revision by the City of Pals / CARA>aRT� Desert Department of Public Works, if construction has not a omminwed within r ( o ) F. F. iol8 ��- ��/.,S �� ;� FF 98.93 12 months from the date of approval by the Director of Public Works. tc � 98.78 LEGEND E Xi S T.o EX is T. EL• E Vg Tien/ L'v PRoPoSEO ELEV. %oo 10=.go.�4>.sEp Co�/ToUR 100 1WR50 MR Y , E77 WALL =- SANTA N 89"44 E Ne9-49"E RVJH (oaf N OTES �-- 2YZ" A. C. O vER A1,Q7 6 O�jJ►• Q3P- M,q.90MIq Y RET. WgZ1_ . , . ... ., �X1577 6~£'4b4rB �GuTTER Q-REDH/ooD HERDER Q-- 2'-0 f'L'C. Gu7-7-ER WAY EARTHWORK CUT: 67 FILL: 11 PREPARED BY: W 7wWwff"AwZ�1 r ' JOSEPH CICCHINI Consulting Civil Engineer (619) 341.2273 72-811 Hwy. 111 Suite 207 PALM DESERT, CA 92260-3316 Ci LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 12, PALM VILLAGE GARDEN TRACT, M.B.21/56-57, LOT 5, PALM VILLAGE GARDEN TRACT N0, 2, M.B. 22/50. ADD E A.P.N. 627-101-0279 627-101-025 BENCH MARK ASSUMED DATUM, ELEVATION 100.00: VICINITY MAP