Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
PP 85-38 HOTEL/HIGHWAY 111/FRED WARING 1986
PD blocks Mervyn 's store from site By DANIEL BLUME and Highway 111,adjacent to Goldey's proposed stand against the Fred Waring-Highway 111 Desert Sun Staff Writer site. location. PALM DESERT — Developers hoping to Dozens of residents of the nearby Sandpiper "We remain interested," Chisessi said in a build a Mervyn's department store, already condominium complex protested the proposal telephone interview from Mervyn's head- turned down once by the City Council, are con- last year, complaining that the project would quarters in Hayward. tinuing to run into barriers in their efforts to increase traffic and would not fit with El Chisessi said he sought Snyder's help"in look- locate here. • Pasco's existing upscale image. ing at the site we're interested in,"but stressed, In the latest attempt,a proposal by developer According to Mayor Walter Snyder, the "Nothing officially has been brought before the Bob Goldey of San Diego to build a luxury hotel, increase in traffic that Mervyn's would gen- city." retail shops and a Mervyn's store on a 31-acre erate is again the issue in the latest proposal. Snyder said he would distribute the letter to parcel at Highway 111 and Fred Waring Drive, "The traffic count on(Highway)I11 is already other council members and city staff members at the city's western border,has hit a snag. The. about at its maximum,"Snyder said. to see if the city wants to re-evaluate its pre- Planning Department staff advised Goldey not "With this site,the same problem(as with the liminary advice. to pursue the Mervyn's store at that location site turned down by the council) almost exists. Snyder said the staffs direction to Goldey because the store does not meet zoning require- They admit themselves that over 8,000(vehicle) advising him not to include department stare trips a day would be created by their store." "The city told us that if we want to do this in his application came in part as a result thing,take the Mervyn's out,"Goldey said. Snyder added, "We have three or four other of a council study session in which council mem don't p - The developer complied, explaining, "I laces Mervyn's ought to look at," but declined hers concluded informally that they opposed a want to do battle with them." to specify their locations. Mervyn's at the Goldey site because of the The council turned down another developer's Mervyn's officials, however,apparently have additional traffic it would generate. proposal for a 12.5-acre shopping complex not yet given up on locating a store on the Zoning for the parcel is PC-4(resort commer- anchored by a Mervyn's amid considerable con- 31-acre site. Snyder received a letter from Rod cial),permitting hotels and retail stores,but not troversy last January. That project would have Chisessi, a member of Mervyn's real estate, allowing department stores, according to city been located at the southwest corner of El Paseo staff,last week asking the city to reconsider its planner Phil Drell. Ashida PROOF OF P 11CATION This space is f� a County Clerk's Filing StamP RECEIVED (20I5.5 c.c.P.) 86 FEB 3 Pal 1 49 61TY CLERKS OFFICE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, County of Riverside CITY OF PALM DESERT I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the ageof eighteen years, and not a party to Proof of Publication of or interested in the above-entitled matter. I CASE NO. PP 85-38 am the principal clerk of the printer of the ................................ "" DESERT POST ......................................:........... ............................................ CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE •CASE NO:PP 6538 a newspaper of general circulation, printed NOTICEes rt City GIVEN that a o consider hearing willbb held before DAWNIGOLDhe PAIR Desert City Council to considers request d DAWNrGOLDEY .-• PARTNERSHIP for approval of a precise plan of design for 204,300 ' and ubf fished ..B i'�?e e k l Y................. square last of resort commercial along with a 250 room hotel with 24 p caslia units on property zoned resort commercial(PC.4)for a 32 acre parcel at the southwest corner of Highway 111 and Fred Waring Drive. in the City of .•.P AIR-•P•q.4 PXX............. SAID public hearing will be held on Thursday,February 13.1985 at 7:00 P.M.In the Council Chamber at the Palm Desert City Hell,73-510 Fred County of Riverside, and which news- Waring Drive,Palm Desert,California,at which time and place all In. Paper has been adjudged a newspaper terested persons are invited to attend and be heard. If you challenge the proposed actions in court,you may be limited to raising only those of general circulation by the .Superior Issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in Court of the County of Riverside, Slate of this notice,or In written correspondence delivered to the city councilor planning commission)at,or prior to.the public hearing.SheliaR. lligen,Gry Clark ,b 4. City of Palm Desert,California 19 • California,under the date of.In/A.r f (Pub.D.P.Jan.31,1886) 83658 rn that the notice, -© }lief Alto s.r JI Case Number ................ r ,.;,; rn.zz of which the annexed Is a printed copy (set s l has .. , . in type not smaller than nonparelt), _ t been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not In any rM supplement thereof on the following dates, Ijlt I S to-wit: a? " ':•tC� ,` all in the year 19.8.6.. certify (or declare) under penalty of . :............ nn:o.sn ,r.,,,•,r. perjury that the foregoing Is true and correct. i' P'alm Desert Datedat......................................... Ca[if orniaa], this � 31stdayof...Jan,. 1986 Frco(4p1410l thl6 blare form m�Y b�Ncund Iromr CALIFORNIA NEWSPAPER SERVICE BUREAU, Legal Advertising Clearing House 120 west Second St., Los Angeles, all(- 90012 Telephone: (213) pluurw %GENE AL P roorooff Publlulion y CITY OF PALM DESERT TRANSMITTAL LETTER I. TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council 11. REQUEST: Approval of a negative declaration of environmental impact and precise plan of design for a 204,300 square foot retail commercial shopping center and 250 room plus 24 casitas destination resort hotel on a 32 acre parcel at the southwest corner of Highway Ill and Fred Waring Drive. III. APPLICANT: DAWN/GOLDEY III PARTNERSHIP 4320 La Jolla Village Drive, Suite 250 San Diego, CA 92122 IV. CASE NO: PP 85-38 V. DATE: February 13, 1986 VI. CONTENTS: A. Staff Recommendation B. Discussion C. Draft Resolution No. D. Planning Commission Minutes involving Case No. PP 85-38. E. Planning Commission Resolution No. 1110. F. Planning Commission Staff Report dated December 17, 1985 & January 7, 1986. G. Related maps and/or exhibits. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ A. RECOMMENDATION: Deny the request based on the planning commission denial of the application. B. DISCUSSION: December 17, 1985 the public hearing was held by planning commission. There was no public testimony at the public hearing. Staff had recommended approval subject to a series of revisions (ie: inclusion of Hoames Pool site and access from Fred Waring Drive) . Commission was of the opinion that the city should hold out for a resort type of development which complies with the intent of the PC (4) zone. This plan is 2/3 commercial and 1/3 hotel . Staff was directed to prepare a resolution of denial and present same, with findings, to the next meeting. PP 85-38 January 7, 1986 staff presented the resolution of denial with findings. The applicant requested a one month continuance in order to meet with a sub-committee of planning commission to see if there was any common ground. Commission felt that the proposal was not close to being what the city was looking for. , Commission on a 5-0 vote adopted its resolution no. 1110 denying the application. �f Prepared by Reviewed and Approved by /dlg 1 2 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, DENYING A PRECISE PLAN OF DESIGN AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FOR A 204,300 SQUARE FOOT RETAIL COMMERCIAL SHOPPING CENTER IN CONJUNCTION WITH A 274 UNIT HOTEL DEVELOPMENT INCLUDING A 7,000 SQUARE FOOT RESTAURANT FACILITY AS WELL AS TWO UNSPECIFIED 29,250 SQUARE FOOT BUILDING PADS ON A 32 ACRE SITE AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF HIGHWAY Ill AND FRED WARING DRIVE. CASE NO. PP 85-38 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 13th day of February 1986 hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider the request by DAWN/GOLDEY Ill PARTNERSHIP for above mentioned project. WHEREAS, planning commission did on January 7, 1986 adopt its resolution no. 1110 denying the application. WHEREAS, the planning commission made the following findings to justify its denial of the precise plan. 1 . The proposal as submitted d i d not include the 1 .7 acre Hoams Pool site which should be Included in any development plan for this property. 2. The precise plan as proposed did not included access from Fred Waring Drive, which should be provided. 3. The intent of the present zoning is to provide restaurants and hotels on the site with commercial uses ancillary to the hotels and restaurants. The proposed plan does not meet this intent in that the retail commercial development is completely separate and is the dominant use on the 32 acre site. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1 . That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the city council in this case. 2. That the city council concurs with the findings adopted by planning commission. 3. That Precise Plan 85-38 is hereby denied. 4. That since the project is denied no project exists and, therefore, no further CEQA action is necessary. RESOLUTION NO. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert City Council , held on this day of 1986 by the following vote to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RICHARD KELLY, Mayor ATTEST: SHEILA R. GILLIGAN, City Clerk City of Palm Desert, California /dig 2 �s s - ` 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 January 24. 19B6 CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE CASE NO: PP 85-36 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held before the Palm Desert City Council to consider a request by DAWN/GOLDEY PARTNERSHIP for approval of a precise plan of design for 2D4,300 square feet of resort commer- cial along with a 250 room hotel with 24 casita units on property zoned resort commercial (PC-4) for a 32 acre parcel at the southwest corner of Highway III and Fred Waring Drive. is T t T l I- 7, a_i ,P� cv AHD S.R 2�o V 1 1 1 - . ,J a P.R. 22 — E°P. ' �. _ ... ee d �.., (4), iBRUgH 00 o c RBI o- 001 U) P.C. S P. - �� N — R I Iz,o o i11 I (4), ,- aMpN�ANIiG O _ r 12, 00- u, l RI N a I R-2 SIF' FRED WAR ING DRIVE S IL MIP. 6 SEL P R-I L'..•' ,; ' • •i tiY.i{ llJt�,]I�x fa� ! x crNU1tJ n , ". y,r d.r.'� H 5 J,' SUBJECT PROPERTY 5 fNPh VISIA R�L PG � Z't:j f'J�t�'ri x( •J�TMh,t +ri .t• U •.R_.1 • � :lf. -[ n 14:1 Rrafi {jl,v .4rJ�,f �' W ' • l: , i x rlu�1 P If) 2 ul 1,� • .° •'1' t \'ai j,-. � C a,�-4T�' 9 - RCNCHU fR4C SE ' P.R.-6, S.P. ll{ + 1 o P.C. (3), S.P. ,,.,r SAID public hearing will be held on Thursday, February 13, 1986 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber at the Palm Desert City Hall , 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all Interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. " If you challenge the proposed actions In court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspon- dence delivered to the city council (or planning commission) at, or prior to, the public hearing. PUBLISH: Desert Post Sheila R. Gilligan, City Clerk January 31 , 1986 City of Palm Desert, California i �6-39 MIACTIVID January 27, : 1986 JAN 3 1 1986 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CITY OF PALM DESERT Mayor Kelly and City Council Members City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 Dear Mayor Kelly and City Council Members: On the morning of January 21, 1986, Mayor Kelly and City Manager Bruce Altman met with us to discuss our proposal for the development located at the SWC of Fred Waring Drive and Highway 111. At that time, we exchanged our views regarding the development of this site. We feel that with continued communication, and respect to our economic guidelines, we can compose a master plan that will benefit both the City and us. We, The Dawn Company, have the capabilities to bring together these elements to make this site an asset to the Palm Desert Community. At this time, The Dawn Company would like to request a continuance. We would like to keep the line of communication open-:in order to develop this site to its best possible use. Sincerely, THE DAWN COMPANY �\ Bob Goldey +i : - Partner BG:dm 4320 La Jolla Village Drive Suite 250 San Diego,California 92122 (619)457-1676 - 1 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NOTICE OF ACTION Date: January 9, 1986 DAWN/GOLDEY III PARTNERSHIP 4320 La Jolla Village Drive, Suite 250 San Diego, CA 92122 Re:" PP 85-38 The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of January 7, 1986. DENIED BY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1110. CARRIED 5-0. Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Community Development, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen ( 15) days of the date of the decision. RAMON A. DIAZ, SECk/T PALM DESERT PLANNING MISSION RAD/tm PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1110 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, DENYING A PRECISE PLAN OF DESIGN AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FOR A 204,300 SQUARE FOOT RETAIL COMMERCIAL SHOPPING CENTER IN CONJUNCTION WITH A 274 UNIT HOTEL DEVELOPMENT INCLUDING A 7,000 SQUARE FOOT RESTAURANT FACILITY AS WELL AS TWO UNSPECIFIED 29,250 SQUARE FOOT BUILDING PADS ON A 32 ACRE SITE AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF HIGHWAY III AND FRED WARING DRIVE. CASE NO. PP 85-38 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 17th day of December, 1985, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider the request of DAWN/GOLDEY ill PARTNERSHIP for above mentioned project. WHEREAS, after reviewing the proposed precise plan and considering all testimony and arguments said commission indicated that it could not approve the request and directed staff to prepare a resolution of denial ; WHEREAS, after reviewing the proposed precise plan and considering all testimony and arguments commission did find the following facts and reasons to exist to justify the denial of said precise plan: 1 . The proposal as submitted did not include the 1 .7 acre Hoams Pool site which should be included in any development plan for this property. 2. The precise plan as proposed did not include access from Fred Waring Drive, which should be provided. 3. The intent of the present zoning is to provide restaurants and hotels on the site with commercial uses ancillary to the hotels and restaurants. The proposed plan does not meet this intent in that the retail commercial development is completely separate and is the dominant use on the 32 acre site. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1 . That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the commission in this case; 2. That Precise Plan 85-38 .is hereby denied. 3. That since the project is denied no project exists and, therefore, no further CEQA action is necessary. it PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1110 PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 7th day of January, 1986, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: DOWNS, ERWOOD, RICHARDS, WOOD, AND CRITES NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE BUFORD-CRITES, ' Chairman ATTES / .7' ^ !� RAMON A. DIAZ, Secret 'r /tm 2 > MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION JANUARY 7, 1986 Wood was looking to tear the building down and what the real motive was. Commissioner Wood answered the first part of the question by saying that a veterinary hospital treat dogs and cats and are put in the back of the facility and held there. He felt that it should be away and is against public welfare. He declined comment on the second part of the question. Commissioner Richards asked if he envisioned a noise problem. Commissioner Wood replied that it was one problem. Moved by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner Erwood, adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 1109, approving CUP 85-6, subject to conditions. Carried 4-1 (Commissioner Wood voting no. ) VII1 . MISCELLANEOUS A. Case No. PP 85-38 DAWN/GOLDEY III PARTNERSHIP, Applicant Resolution of denial . Mr. Smith outlined the findings on the resolution and discussed with commission a possible conflict with a future proposal . Commission felt there was no conflict and that a precedent would not be set by passing this resolution. Chairman Crites stated that he had reviewed the tape and discussion on the project and felt comfortable in participating in the discussion. MR. MARK HENSLEY requested a continuance on the basis of the PC (4) zoning. He stated that he would like to work with the city to find some common ground. He requested a one month continuance. Commissioner Richards stated that while he would be willing to serve on a subcommittee to study this case, he did not feel the project was anywhere near what the city was looking for. After further discussion, commission felt that the resolution of denial was appropriate at this time. Action: Moved by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner Erwood, adopting the findings as presented by staff. Carried 5-0. 12 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION JANUARY 7, 1986 Moved by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner Erwood, adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. I110, denying PP 85-38. Carried 5-0'. IX. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS None. X. COMMENTS A. Commission discussed the upcoming joint planning commission/city council meeting for January 24 to discuss sidewalks (Monterey and the wash) , city entrances and zoning, etc. Commission was in favor of a fixed agenda and viewing the sites before the discussion. B. Chairman Crites noted that two meetings ago staff had prepared a graph layout for the senior citizens project and requested that all new proposals be placed in that form. C. Chairman Crites stated that he would like members of the commission to very specifically look at staff reports with an issue in mind: the last four or five meetings there have been a number of times when members of the commission have suggested that staff report have been one-sided or selling jobs or biased and such things as that. He said that if members of the commission feel that it is true, he would appreciate it if members would specifically go to staff with examples of what those issues are so that it is not an on-going problem that the commission ends up with in public hearings. He did not feel it did the commission, staff or the city any good to create the kind of adversary role and a role in which commission continually (appropriately or not) snipe at staff concerning their presentation style on things. He stated that he would like that issue addressed between members of commission and staff to work that out. Commissioner Wood asked how the commission could objectively analyze a report when it has not received all of the evidence. He felt it is not until such time as its presented to the commission and noted that other commissioners bring up points that he may not have thought of or points from public testimony. Chairman Crites felt that it was different than saying that the staff reports themselves are deliberately. one sided in nature. 13 'd I. 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 January 24, 1986 CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE CASE NO: PP 85-38 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held before the Palm Desert City Council to consider a request by DAWN/GOLDEY PARTNERSHIP for approval of a precise plan of design for 204,300 square feet of resort commer- cial along with a 250 room hotel with 24 casita units on property zoned resort commercial (PC-4) for a 32 acre parcel at the southwest corner of Highway III and Fred Waring Drive. e: ',•ICSC;.$ .7i; ..:• .I' ,>i�V' -,_._,-e:--IJ`W-1 11, ,l,V��—•Uµ N - r t t i-11 1= 7� d-� > NR_I 1 Tr— r AHD S_.,P. 2 00 --'L'_' p — AVE 22 oon ' _. 0Je � . :R-I o fA f}liiltll{-.i : PC. A".. ., S.P.:P•.{ { ,h)E,tL:Ir(,�C1'jy'r [• (4)•:1 :4r•' : : !' ___aU, _j_ __ x' I OR I l F NITA N12,000. ' . R- -2 SIP t R_ FRED WARING DRIVE R , I n � I - R1 %a• ; . '�'>,.�.�� I : P. 6 S.P. flu �.•••�.• .,r '�i, 1x✓'l"15), i,�. t.�t:44'� E. 11\.., 1 ,•: � • 1'S�� t ��i<4.di5t��rillt�cY� 1 11r%• .. : ,i (�3.I,�a��L(xi• �tG� 'r.,`{ .. R .I. ^�q `'' ••• •:r•• •' • !r+•iiaN.f1"h�s.+ T PROPERT : r� els,A i:i,•',''•I•.i•: �,•4.J 3tkq 1%/R+}f_FI'ty jf;s`i IMM AMPICU UN:VE EL I'i i,•�••..�.�•.' , .±,% 'GK•'V.L n,tl fi`75;,>: i.-gN2E LEEO e `+i'; ;r ' I••:;• • _ ?`_'tf y%• _ i 4}'"Fu` a^NCNC (PANE^ Ir •ulli/.:. • •' .'; '••� • P.R.-6, S.P. d P.C. (3), S{.P. SAID public hearing will be held on Thursday, February 13, 1986 at 7:00 p.m. In the Council Chamber at the Palm Desert City Hall , 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all Interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. if you challenge the proposed actions in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspon- dence delivered to the city council (or planning commission) at, or prior to, the public hearing. PUBLISH: Desert Post Sheila R. Gilligan, City Clerk January 31 , 1986 City of Palm Desert, California 1 1 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 November 27, 1985 CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE CASE NO. PP 85-38 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by DAWN/GOLDEY PARTNERSHIP :. for approval of a precise plan of design for 204,300 square feet of resort commercial along with a 250 room hotel with 24 casita units on property zoned . "''' resort commercial (PC-4) for a 32 acre parcel at the southwest corner of ':' ! Highway III and Fred Waring Drive. is ,1 i i SAID public hearing will be held on Tuesday, December 17, 1985, at 2:00 p.^I. in the Council Chamber at the Palm Desert Civic Center, 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, . Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all interested persons are ' invited to attend and be heard. If you challenge the proposed actions in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described In this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the planning commission (or city council ) at, or prior to, the public hearing. PUBLISH: Palm Desert Post RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary December 6, 1985 Palm Desert Planning Commission ' ' . INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM City of Palm Desert TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT/PLANNING DATE: JANUARY 7, 1986 SUBJECT: PP 85-38, Dawn/Goldey III Partnership December 17, 1985, planning commission reviewed a request for a 204,300 square foot retail commercial shopping center in conjunction with a 274 unit hotel development including a 7000 square foot restaurant for a 32 acre site at the southwest corner of Highway III and Fred Waring Drive. At that time commission determined that, it could not approve the proposal because it did not comply with the intent of the ordinance and consequently instructed staff to prepare a resolution of denial . Staff has prepared a draft resolution with findings as delineated by commission. Commission should review the resolution and specifically the three findings contained therein. RECOMMENDATION: 1 . That commission formally adopt the findings contained within the draft resolution. 2. That commission adopt Resolution No. , denying PP 85-38. STEVE SMITH, ACTING DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT/PLANNING /tm PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, DENYING A PRECISE PLAN OF DESIGN AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FOR A 204,300 SQUARE FOOT RETAIL COMMERCIAL SHOPPING CENTER IN CONJUNCTION WITH A 274 UNIT HOTEL DEVELOPMENT INCLUDING A 7,000 SQUARE FOOT RESTAURANT FACILITY AS WELL AS TWO UNSPECIFIED 29,250 SQUARE FOOT BUILDING PADS ON A 32 ACRE SITE AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF HIGHWAY III AND FRED WARING DRIVE. CASE NO. PP 85-38 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 17th day of December, 1985, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider the request of DAWN/GOLDEY III PARTNERSHIP for above mentioned project. WHEREAS, after reviewing the proposed precise plan and considering all testimony and arguments said commission indicated that it could not approve the request and directed staff to prepare a resolution of denial ; WHEREAS, after reviewing the proposed precise plan and considering all testimony and arguments commission did find the following facts and reasons to exist to justify the denial of said precise plan: 1 . The proposal as submitted did not include the 1 .7 acre Hoams Pool site which should be included in any development plan for this property. 2. The precise plan as proposed did not include access from Fred Waring Drive, which should be provided. 3. The intent of the present zoning is to provide restaurants and hotels on the site with commercial uses ancillary to the hotels and restaurants. The proposed plan does not meet this intent in that the retail commercial development is completely separate and is the dominant use on the 32 acre site. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1 . That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the commission in this case; 2. That Precise Plan 85-38 is hereby denied. 3. That since the project is denied no project exists and, therefore, no further CEQA action is necessary. PLANNING COMMISSION RcaOLUTION NO. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 7th day of January, 1986, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: BUFORD CRITES, Chairman ATTEST: RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary /tm 2 i ' I CITY OF PALM DESERT DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission DATE: December 17, 1985 CASE NO'S: PP 85-38 REQUEST: Approval of a negative declaration of environmental impact and precise plan of design for a 204,300 square foot retail commercial shopping center and 250 room plus 24 casitas destina- tion resort hotel on a 32 acre parcel at the southwest corner of Highway III and Fred Waring Drive. APPLICANT: DAWN/GOLDEY III PARTNERSHIP 4320 La Jolla Village Drive, Suite 250 San Diego, CA 92122 I. BACKGROUND: A. PREVIOUS PERTINENT CASES (DP 03-80 t VAR 03-80) September 17, 1980 planning commission approved a resort hotel commercial development consisting of 390 units yielding up to 780 rooms, restaurants, retail shops and convention facility. As of March, 1984 the project had not been started and a request for extension of the approval was refused by planning commission. Tract Map No. 4489, Eagle Development Company, a condominium develop- ment was recorded in 1976 and street and utility improvements completed but no units completed. B. CURRENT APPLICANT HISTORY: In October 1985 the applicant submitted a precise plan request for 232, 000 square foot retail commercial center including a 60,000 square foot department store plus a 250 room resort destination hotel with 24 casitas and a change of zone request from PC (4) to PC (2) lie: resort commercial to district commercial ) . The applicant had been advised that a department store was not a listed permitted use in the PC (4) zone. This proposal was referred to a joint sub-committee of city council and planning commission to obtain preliminary input. This joint committee indicated it could not support the proposed zone change. The applicant was advised of this opinion and subsequently amended the application by deleting the department store and reducing the commercial area from 232,000 to 204,000 square feet. 7 I. The negative opinion of the joint sub-committee was based on the likely traffic problems associated with having a department store in this location as well as recollection of certain commitments to the owner of the commercial center on the north side of Fred Waring Drive. C. DESCRIPTION OF SITE: The site is an irregularly shaped piece of property containing 32.4 acres with approximately 1105 feet of frontage on Highway 111 , 550 feet of frontage on Fred Waring Drive and 2125 feet of frontage on Painters Path. Along the fourth side is the Palm Valley Channel . The current proposal does not include the 1 .7 acres Hoams Pool site. D. ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE: North: Across Fred Waring Drive/PC (4) Restaurant Park South: Across Storm Channel/PR-6/Vacant residential West: Across Painters Path/PC-4/Vacant - commercial at base of mountain East: Across Highway III/PC-4/Vacant Commercial E. GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION: , Resort Commercial 11. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A. GENERAL: The request is for approval of a precise plan of design which would include some 204,300 square feet of commercial on approximately 21 acres and a destination resort hotel containing 250 and 24 casita units on approximately 10 acres. The commercial development would be on the northerly two thirds (2/3) of the site. The hotel is to be located along Painters Path and the storm channel . B. PRECISE PLAN: 1 . a. GENERAL The commercial center has been designed in a "U" or horseshoe shape opening toward Highway 111 . Two large tenant units of 38,025 square feet and 30,625 square feet along with medium and smaller sized units are delineated. Two 29,250 square foot building pads are to be located on either side of the entry driveway adjacent to Highway 111 . b. The southerly 10 acres of the site is to be developed with a 250 unit hotel plus 24 casita units. The casitas wi l l be located adjacent to the storm channel . The hotel is oriented 2 toward Painters Path and has access thereto. North of the hotel is a restaurant site, 3 lighted tennis courts, raquet ball courts, tennis clubhouse and a tournament tennis court located over parking area. 2. PARKING AND ACCESS: In accordance with planning commission direction the applicant has limited access to the site. One access point is provided from Highway 111 and this access will be right turn in and right turn out only. . No median break is requested nor would one be permitted. In addition an access to the retail center is provided from Painters Path. Other access points further south on Painters Path provide access to the hotel and restaurant. Staff has some concern that the applicant did not provide for access from Fred Waring Drive. Public works has requested a traffic analysis which would indicate the impacts this development would have on area streets be prepared. This report would aid in signal phasing and indicate any need for additional left turn lanes. Parking has been located throughout the site. The retail commercial portion requests 204,300 square feet plus two building pads each 29,250 square feet. The 204,300 square feet has a parking require- ment of 1124 spaces (ie: 204,300 X 5.5 space/1 ,000 square feet) . The site plan indicates that 1300 spaces are to be provided in this area. This means that 176 spaces are left for development on the pads. Based on 5.5 spaces per 1 ,000 square feet a total of 32,000 square feet of building or 16,000 square feet per pad could be built. Parking for the commercial center is adequate to meet code. The hotel and restaurant part of the site will provide 434 parking spaces. A 274 unit hotel has a code requirement of 302 spaces ( ie: 274 X 1 . 1 spaces) while a 7004 square foot restaurant has a code requirement of 90 spaces. Therefore, total demand is 392 and 434 are provided. 3. LANDSCAPING: The site will be provided with perimeter as well as interior site landscaping. Along the streets, adjacent to the curb will be 4 foot high masonry walls with plants on either side. Further refinement to the landscape plan will be required at time of submission to architectural commission. Staff is satisfied that the landscape areas are of adequate size to allow for an effective landscape statement. 4. ARCHITECTURE: The project is basically spanish in nature. Stucco walls, tile roofing are proposed with extensive use of arches. Most of the 3 7 i I buildings will be 20 feet in height while the large units will be 28 feet. Thirty (30) feet is permitted in the zone. Elevations of the hotel and restaurant have not been provided although it is known that it will be three stories while the casitas will be two stories. The zone permits hotels to be 35 feet where they are setback at least 100 feet from residential property. This site conforms to that criteria. This whole proposal , if approved by planning commission, will require full architectural commission review and approval . 5. EXTERIOR LIGHTING: Parking lot lighting, although not indicated on the site plan, will undoubtedly be requested. This is a very large parking area so some care is required to assure that the lighting is not offensive. The applicant will be required to provide staff with a detailed dot matrix computer generated lighting plan to indicate that adequate yet not excessive lighting, in accordance with the ordinance is attained. B. REQUIRED FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL OF A PRECISE PLAN: I . The design of the precise plan will not substantially depreciate property values in the vicinity. Justification: The use is attractive and acceptable from a design aspect and will not be incompatible with existing and proposed uses in the immediate area. The project complies with all provisions of the zoning ordinance and will be reviewed through the architectural review process to assure a quality project. 2. The precise plan will not unreasonably interfere with the use or enjoyment of property in the vicinity by occupants thereof for lawful purposes. Justification: The surrounding land on three sides is zoned for a compatible type of use and owners would not be deprived the use of their land, nor would they be negatively impacted by traffic due to improvements to adjacent streets and ability to handle increased traffic. The residentially zoned property across the storm channel is vacant and in addition the low intensity casita units are located adjacent to the channel and this will tend to insure that this project will not interfere with the enjoyment of that property. 3. The precise plan will not endanger the public peace, health, safety' or general welfare. 4 7 f Justification: The project is designed in a manner that will not endanger the public peace, health, safety or general welfare due to compliance with code requirements and compatibility with surrounding properties. C. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The director of community development has determined that the project will not have an adverse environmental impact on the environ- ment and a negative declaration of environmental impact has been prepared. D. STAFF CONCERNS: Staff has several concerns which should be addressed. The first concerns the limited uses permitted in the PC (4) zone (see attached copy of permitted uses) . The applicant is proposing 203,400 square feet of commercial space. This seems considerable given the limited permitted uses. It is interesting to note that although a department store is not a delineated permitted use many of the uses found within a department store are permitted in the zone. The zoning ordinance ( ie: Section 25.30.025.D) provides that planning commission may permit other uses which are determined to be similar to those listed. If planning commission were to make this determination then the applicant may wish to reevaluate his project. From the city's point of view, if the use were determined to be within the intent of the ordinance then the other concerns of the sub-committee, namely traffic impacts, could be reviewed. Given that public works depart- ment has required, by its condition #17, preparation of a traffic analysis the impacts of the current proposal could reasonably easily be compared with traffic impacts generated by the earlier application. A very preliminary analysis preformed by the public works staff indicates that the earlier plan would have generated approximately 11 ,758 trips per average weekday while the current commercial proposal would generate 10,338 trips. These trip numbers do not include 2795 trips to the hotel ( ie: 274 rooms X 10.2 trips/day) . Adding these in raises the totals to 13, 133 versus 14,553 trips. These figures do not include the uses which will occupy the two pads nor the restaurant associated with the hotel . Therefore, the large plan, proposing a department store could be expected to generate up to 10.8% more.daiIy trips to the site. 5 One other concern of the sub-committee was that the city had made certain commitments to the developer of the center to the north and a department store was not part of those assurances. The importance of this commitment might be given less emphasis given the ownership of the center has changed. If planning commission is not opposed to a department store and indicates it may make a determination of use to permit a department store then staff would suggest that the present owners of the center as well as operators of the restaurants and businesses in the center to the north be polled on their position relative to a department store on this site. Another issue which came to light relative to this site was that after the public notice was mailed property owners in Sandpiper expressed concern that a bridge over the storm channel would be a part of this plan. There is no proposal to construct a bridge over the storm channel to connect the two portions of Painters Path. Another concern of staff involves the lack of ingress - egress from Fred Waring Drive. It would seem to be advantageous to provide one in this 550 foot stretch of frontage. An access in this area should result in fewer "U" turns being made by west bound Highway ill travellers . This is the type of information which the traffic analysis could address. Another concern of staff involves the 1 .7 acre Hoams Pool property. This property has not been included in this development plan because the applicant has been unable to acquire it. It is staff's position that the development of the subject property should not proceed without including the 1 .7 acre site in that the buildings on the site are substantially below the usual city standard and the access near the bridge is hazardous. Planning staff have discussed the matter with the executive director of the redevelopment agency and if commission so directs that department will begin to look into acquiring the site on behalf of this applicant. ICI. CONCLUSION: There are many potential revisions to the precise plan that has been submitted ( ie: access to Fred Waring Drive and expansion of site to include Hoams Pool site) . In addition, it would appear that the traffic impacts associated with a department store on this site may not be substantially more than those created by the proposed development. The proposed department store use, if planning commission had no objection to it, could be determined to be a similar to use to those permitted in the zone. The revision of the original plan came as a result of input from the sub-committee group. If it is commission's position that there is no way a department store can go on this site then the action of planning 6 Y � commission today would be to approve, deny or approve subject to revisions the plan as presented before you. A resolution with appropriate conditions has been included in the packet. If planning commission wishes to give further consideration to a depart- ment store the case could be continued to allow further study which could include detailed traffic analysis and contact with the owner's and operators at the center to the north. Finally planning commission should, if it so wishes, adopt a minute motion asking the redevelopment agency to attempt to acquire the 1 .7 acre Hoams Pool site to be made a part of this development. IV. ATTACHMENTS: A. Draft Resolution B. Legal Notice C. Negative Declaration and Initial Study D. Comments from City Departments and Agencies E. Plans and Exhibits F. Letters from Adjacent Homeowners G. Copy of permitted uses in PC (4) zone Prepared by Reviewed and Approved by /dlg 7 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PRECISE PLAN OF DESIGN AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FOR A 204,300 SQUARE FOOT RETAIL COMMERCIAL SHOPPING CENTER IN CONJUNCTION WITH A 274 UNIT HOTEL DEVELOPMENT INCLUDING A 7,000 SQUARE FOOT RESTAURANT FACILITY AS WELL AS TWO UNSPECIFIED 29,250 SQUARE FOOT BUILDING PADS ON A 32 ACRE SITE AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF HIGHWAY Ill AND FRED WARING DRIVE. CASE NO. PP 85-38 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 17th day of December, 1985 hold a duly notice public hearing to consider the request by DAWN/GOLDEY Ill PARTNERSHIP for above mentioned project. WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedures to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 80-89" in that the director of community development has determined that the project will not have an adverse impact on the environment and a negative declaration is hereby certified. WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, of all interested person desiring to be heard, said commission did find the following facts and reasons to exist to justify the granting of said precise plan of design. I . The design of the precise plan will not substantially depreciate property values in the vicinity. 2. The precise plan will not unreasonably interfere with the use or enjoyment of the property in the vicinity by the occupants thereof for lawful purposes. 3. The precise plan will not endanger the public peace, health, safety or general welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: I . That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the commission in this case. 2. That approval of Precise Plan 85-38 is hereby granted for reasons subject to the attached conditions. 3. That a negative declaration of environmental impact is hereby certified. I __ i r M PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this day of , 1985 by the following vote to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: BUFORD CRITES, Chairman ATTEST: RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary /dlg 2 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO. PP 85-38 Department of Community Development: 1 . The development of the property shall conform substantially with exhibits on file with the department of community development, as modified by the following conditions. 2. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for construction of any uses contemplated by this approval , the applicant shall first complete all the procedural requirements of the city which include, but are not limited to, architectural review and building permit procedures. 3. Construction of a portion of said project shall commence within two years from the date of final approval unless a time extension is granted, other- wise said approval shall become null , void and of no effect whatsoever. 4. Prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contem- plated by this approval , the applicant shall first obtain permits and/or clearance from the following agencies: Riverside County Department of Health Palm Desert Architectural Commission City Fire Marshal Coachella Valley Water District Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to the department of building and safety at the time of issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. 5. All conditions of the architectural commission shall be met. 6. Adequate trash enclosures to be provided to satisfaction of city and Palm Desert Disposal . 7. All parking areas shall be effectively screened by walls or landscaped berm or combination thereof. 8. All building along Highway III shall be setback 30 feet from new curbline. 9. Street improvements and perimeter landscaping treatment to be completed prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy for first building. 10. Detailed parking lot and building lighting plan shall be submitted to 3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. staff for approval , subject to applicable lighting standards; plan to be prepared by qualified lighting engineer. Department of Public Works: I . Drainage and signalization fund fees, as required by city ordinance, shall be paid prior to recordation of the final map. 2. Drainage facilities shall be provided, per Ordinance 218 and the Master Drainage Plan, to the specifications of the director of public works. 3. Storm drain construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study by the private engineer that is approved by the department of public works. 4. Full public improvements, including traffic safety lighting and street reconstruction, as required by ordinance and the director of public works, shall be installed in accordance with city standards. 5. Complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required by ordinance to the city engineer for checking and approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. The engineer shall submit "as-built" plans prior to acceptance of the improvements by the city. 6. All private driveways and parking lots shall be inspected by the engineering department and a standard inspection fee shall be paid prior to recordation of the final map. 7. Landscaping maintenance on Highway 111 , Fred Waring Drive, Painters Path and along the Palm Valley Storm Channel shall be provided by the property owner. 8. Traffic safety striping on Highway Ill , Fred Waring Drive and Painters Path shall be provided t the specifications of the director of public works and the California Department of Transportation. A traffic control plan must be submitted to and approved by the director of public works and the California Department of Transportation before placing pavement markings. 9. Complete grading plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the city engineer for checking and approval prior to issuance of any permits. 10. Dedication of right-of-way on Highway 111 , Fred Waring Drive and Painters Path shall be done prior to recordation of the final map. 11 . Installation of sidewalk on Highway 111 , Fred Waring Drive and Painters Path. 4 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12. Waiver of access to Highway Ill , Fred Waring Drive and Painters Path except at approve locations shall be granted on the final map. 13. Close unused driveways with full height curb and gutter. 14. Offsite improvement plans to be approved by public works department and a surety posted to guarantee the required offsite improvements prior to recordation of the final map. 15. Full improvement of interior streets based on private street standards as established in accordance with Chapter 26, Section 26.40.040, CPD Code. 16. Installation of one-half landscaped median in Highway 111 and Fred Waring Drive or cash payment for one-half the cost of landscaped median at the option of the director of public works. 17. Traffic analysis to be prepared for the project to address the specific impacts on existing networks (street and intersections) and the proposed mitigation measures recommended for approval by the city and the California Department of Transportation. 18. Size, number and location of driveways to public works specifications with only six driveway approaches to be allowed to service this property. 19. Complete parcel map shall be submitted as required by ordinance to the city engineer for checking and approval and be recorded before issuance of grading permit. 20. Right-of-way dedication and street improvements along Highway Ill shall be in accordance with California Department of Transportation standards and requirements. 21 . Bus turnout shall be provided at the corner of Fred Waring and Highway 111 to the satisfaction of the City of Palm Desert, California Department of Transportation and Sunline Transit Agency. City Fire Marshal : 1 . Install a water system capable of delivering the following: Hotel : 4000 GPM, Casita Units: 2500 GPM, remaining commercial : 3000 GPM fire flow from any fire hydrant for a 3 hour duration in addition to domestic supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement. 2. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants so that no point of any 5 i PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. building is more than 200 feet from a fire hydrant measured along approved vehicular travel ways. a. exterior surface of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow, and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. b. curbs shall be painted red 15 in either direction from each hydrant. C. hydrants shall not be located closer than 25 feet to any building. 3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and three copies of the water system plan to the fire marshal for review. Upon approval , one copy will be sent to the building department and the original will be returned to the developer. 4. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and approved by the water company with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system in PP 85-38 is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the fire marshal". 5. Prior to delivery of combustible materials to the building site, the required water system shall be installed, operating and delivering the required flow. 6. Additional fire protection requirements may be necessary when the applicant submits specific plans for consideration and approval . 7. All fire department sprinkler connections to be within 40' of a fire hydrant and the location approved by the fire marshal . 8. All three story buildings require a fire department standpipe system. 9. Hotel will require a state fire marshal approved fire alarm system. 10. Any portion of the underground parking structure beyond 150' of emergency vehicle access must have a standpipe system so all areas can be reached with 150' of fire hose. 11 . Porte-cochere: 13'6" minimum. 12. All driveway turns are to have a 40' radius minimum. 13. Additional fire protection requirements may be necessary when the applicant submits specific plans for consideration and approval . 14. All buildings over 5,000 square feet require an approved fire sprinkler System. 6 I 1 i \ 6' 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (6191 346-0611 November 27, 1985 CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE CASE NO. PP 65-38 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a publ lc hearing wl II be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by DAWN/GOLDEY PARTNERSHIP :.for approval of a precise plan of design for 204,300 square feet of resort -.:: commercial along with a 25.0 room hotel with 24 caslte units on property zoned resort commercial (PC-4) for a 32 acre parcel at the southwest corner of Highway III and Fred Waring Drive. - i; % \) - '_I�/ Ir" r Fii 1 1 o I N A AHD� SP ,Av � �200 P.R.22 — o D_ PC S.P. �� FI R.I _ ' 12,0 0 ! „ N wANI41JA U 1112 00 R 1 0 S1FP FRED WARING DRIVE ILPC. - R l R-1 _R_i - A,2��3fi 7i tc�Y i. p, (4). P. 6, S.P xNxxe l 'J (?Yjti ter SUBJECT PROPERTY : eVxn vs+a RPC "I, ' \4'11 iA, s�1�Y)x� yts•{at c n 'nmv cN ux vc R11 -m F- R I. ` P.R.-6,S.P. P.C. (3), S.P. I� SAID public hearing will be held on Tuesday, December 17, 1985, at 2:00 p.m. In theCouncil Chamber at the Palm Desert Civic Center, 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all Interested persons are Invited to attend and be heard. If you challenge the proposed actions In court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or In written correspondence delivered to the planning commission (or city council) at, or prior to, the public hearing. PUBLISH- Palm Desert Post - RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary - December 6, 1985 Palm Desert Planning Commission 0 1 �dLIJ� �dl �1 I S7'S�1 �✓V��J`9�1.50 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 NEGATIVE DECLARATION (Pursuant to Title 14, Division 6, Article 7, Section 15083 of the California Administrative Code) Common Project Case No: PP 85-38 Name ( if any) Dawn/Golder Partnership Applicant/Project Sponsor: Dawn/Golder III Partnership, 4320 La Jolla Village Drive Suite 250 San Diego CA, 92122. Project Description/Location: 204,000 square foot retail commercial shopping center and 274 room destination resort hotel at the southwest corner Highway III and Fred Waring Drive. The Director of the Department of Community Development, City of Palm Desert, California, has found that the described project will not have a significant effect on the environment. A copy of the initial study has been attached to document the reasons in support of this finding. Mitigation measures, if any, included in the project to avoid potentially significant effects, may also be found attached. RAMON A. DIAZ DATE Director of Community Development /dlg 1 I INITIAL STUDY CASE NO. PP 85-38 Environmental evaluation checklist comments and possible mitigation measures (categories pertain to attached checklist) . 1 . EARTH - Conditions and Impacts B. The development of the property will result in compaction and overcovering of the existing soil which consists primarily of decomposed granite. C. The site will be graded and the surface relief features changed by paving, planting and construction of buildings. Mitigation Measures: B & C Development of property shall conform with city regulations and ordinances pertaining to grading and drainage. 3. WATER - Conditions and Impacts B. Because of the grading and development anticipated, it can be expected that there will be changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff. Mitigation Measures: B. Same as 1-B & C above. Due to drainage of entire site into Palm Valley Storm Channel , no runoff will be directed to adjacent streets. 9. ECONOMIC LOSS - Conditions and Impacts A. Coachella Valley Water District advises that the area is subject to runoff from the mountains to the west. Mitigation Measures: A. Coachella Valley Water District as well as the city public works department will review the site for adequate storm water protective works prior to any permits being issued. 14. EMPLOYMENT - Conditions and Impact The project will generate new jobs. This employment base will range from store managers, bankers, clerks, apprentices, clerical assistants, gardeners, retailers and the like along with hotel staff. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures necessary. 16. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION - Conditions and Impacts Regional and local access to the site is provided by State Highway 111 . Secondary access is provided from Painters Path. Based upon traffic generation rates of the Institute of Transportation Engineers, the average weekday trip rate per 1000 square feet of gross leasable area would be 50.6 trips for the retail portion and 10.2 trips per day per room in the resort hotel . The current proposal is for 204,300 square feet of retail commercial plus 274 hotel rooms (ie: 250 rooms plus 24 casitas) . Retail Commercial 10,338 trips Hotel 2,795 trips 13, 133 trips A previous proposal to include a 60,000 square foot department store and less ancillary retail space would have resulted in the following trips: Retail Commercial 11 ,758 trips Hotel 2,795 trips 14.553 trips The department of public works is recommending a traffic study be done to determine need for traffic signals, additional phasing, entrance-exit locations and deceleration-acceleration lanes. Results of this study could impact the location of access points to site as well as left turn phasing at the Fred Waring Drive/Highway III intersection. Based on the proposed street improvements on Highway 111 , Fred Waring Drive and Painters Path, the traffic generated by this project can be handled. However, as can be expected peak holiday periods during the "season" with or without this project will generate periods of congestion. The project is designed to comply with applicable off-street parking requirements and, therefore, should not impact adjacent streets. Mitigation Measures: In order to insure adequate traffic capacity and safe circulation, the applicant shall comply with all Caltrans and city requirements and conditions which include, but are not limited to: 1 . Payment of signalization fund fees as per city ordinance. 2. Full public improvements, Including traffic safety lighting and street reconstruction, as required by ordinance and the director of public works, shall be installed in accordance with city standards. 3. Complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the city engineer for checking and approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. The engineer shall submit "as-built" plans prior to the acceptance of the improve- ments by the city. 4. All private driveways and parking lots shall be inspected by the engineering department and a standard inspection fee shall be paid. 5. Traffic safety striping on Highway 111 , Fred Waring Drive and Painters Path shall be provided to the specifications of the director of public works and the California Department of Transportation. A traffic control plan must be submitted to and approved by the director of public works and the California Department of Transpor- tation before placing pavement markings. 6. Dedication of right-of-way on Highway 111 , Fred Waring Drive and painters Path shall be done prior to recordation of the final map. 7. Installation of sidewalk on Highway 111 , Fred Waring Drive and Painters Path. 8. Waiver of access to Highway 111 , Fred Waring Drive and Painters Path except at approved locations shall be granted on the final map. 9. Close unused driveways with full height curb and gutter. 10. Offsite improvement plans to be approved by public works department and a surety posted to guarantee the required offsite improvements prior to recordation of the final map. 11 . Full improvement of interior streets based on private street standards as established in accordance with Chapter 26, Section 26.40.040, CPD Code. 12. Installation of one half landscaped median in Highway III and Fred Waring Drive or cash payment for one half the cost of landscaped median at the option of the director of public works. 13. Traffic analysis to be prepared for the project to address the specific impacts on existing networks (street and intersections) and the proposed mitigation measures recommended for approval by the city and the California Department of Transportation. 14. Size, number and location of driveways to public works specifications with only six driveway approaches to be allowed to serve this property. 15. Complete parcel map shall be submitted as required by ordinance to the city engineer for checking and approval and be recorded before issuance of grading permit. 16. Right-of-way dedication and street improvements along Highway ill shall be in accordance with California Department of Transportation standards and requirements. 17. Bus turnout shall be provided at the corner of Fred Waring Drive and Highway Ill to the satisfaction of the City of Palm Desert and California Department of Transportation and Sunline Transit Agency. 18. PUBLIC FISCAL BALANCE - Conditions and Impacts Construction and operation of the project will result in revenues flowing to the city in the form of construction taxes and fees as well as on going sales tax revenues and transient occupancy tax. Cost of provision of necessary services lie: police, fire etc. ) should not exceed revenue. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures necessary. 23. LIGHT AND GLARE - Conditions and Impacts With the development of the property is can be expected that there will be new lighting systems provided throughout the site. This could create spillover and glare. Mitigation Measures: The lighting systems shall be designed to minimize light spillover and glare and shall comply with city ordinance and be approved prior to installation. r 7 ` CASE NO. ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DEPT. INITIAL STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION CHECKLIST NOTE: The availability of data necessary to address the topics listed below shall form the basis of a decision as to whether the application is considered complete for purposes of environmental assessment. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers, possible mitigation measures and comments are provided on attached sheets) . Yes Maybe No 1 . Earth. Will the proposal result in: , a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? b. Disruptions , displacements , compaction, or overcovering of the soil ? c. Change in topography or ground surface relief / features? d. The destruction, covering, or modification / of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of / soils, either on or off the site? 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors? Yy I c. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or / temperature, or any change in climate, V/ either locally or regionally? _ I r 2. Yes Maybe No 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: a... Changes in currents, "or the course or / direction of water movements? _ b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of — - surface water runoff? c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? d. Alteration of-the direction or rate of / flow of ground waters? e. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or with- drawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? f. Reduction in the amount of water other- wise available for public water supplies? . 4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of plants (including trees , shrubs , grass , and crops)? _ _ b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or endangered species of plants? _ _ c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? 5. Animal. Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds , land animals including reptiles, or insects)? _ b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, / rare, or endangered species of animals? _ _ c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier. to / the migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration to existing wildlife habitat? 3. Yes MnLbe No 6. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in :the rate of use of any natural resources? -r -- - b. Depletion of:any non-renewable natural V/ resource? 0 - - - 7. Energy. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? — b. Demand upon existing sources of energy, or re- quire the.deselopment of new sources of energy? S. Risk of Upset: 'Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, pesticides, oil , chemicals, or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? 9. Economic Loss. Will the proposal result in: :i a. A change in the value of property and improvements endangered by flooding? 1/ t, — — — b. A change in the value of property and improvementsrexposed to geologic hazards beyond accepted community risk standards? — — 10. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels toethe point at which accepted community noise and vibration levels are exceeded? i 11. Land Use. Willethe proposal result in the a t— el—ration of the present developed or / planned land use of an area? 12. Open Space. Will the proposal lead tb a decrease in theramount of designated open / space? V 13. Population. Will the proposal result in: a. Alteration of= the location, distribution, / density, or growth rate of the human V/ population of- the City? b. Change in the population distribution by age, income,-4-eligion, racial , or ethnic group, occupational class , household type? — — — i 4. Yes Maybe No 14. Emoloyment. Will the proposal result in additional new long-term jobs provided, or a change in the number and per cent employed, / unemployed, and underemployed? 15. Housing. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in number and per cent of housing units by type (price or rent range, zoning category, owner-occupied and rental , / etc. ) relative to demand or to number of V/ families in various income classes in the City? b. Impacts on existing housing or creation of a demand for additional housing? 11, Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: / a. Generation of additional vehicular movement? V b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? c. Impact upon existing transportation systems? d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? _ _ _ e. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, / bicyclists, or pedestrians? 17. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for, new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? _ V// b. Police protection? , c. Schools? _ ✓// d. Parks or other recreational facilities? e. Maintenance of public facilities , including roads? _ f. Other governmental services? _ _ ►� e• i ,. 5. Yes Maybe No 18. Public Fiscal Balance. Will the proposal result in a net change in government fiscal flow (revenues less operating expenditures and annualized capital expenditures)? 19. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: a Power or- natural gas? ✓ b. Communications system? c. Water? d. Sewer or septic tanks? e. Storm water drainage? f. Solid waste and disposal? 20. Human Health. Will the proposal result in: a. The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? b. A change in the level of community health care provided? 21. Social Services. Will the proposal result in an increased demand for provision of general social services? 22. Aesthetics . Will the proposal result in: a. Obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public? b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive — — / site open to public view? c. Lessening of the overall neighborhood (or area) attractiveness, pleasantness , --and uniqueness? 23. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce / ne:r light t or glare? V/ 24. Archeo igl/Historical . Will the proposal resu tin an a Iteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object, or building? 0 1 9 ' f. 6. Yes MLbe No 25. Mandatory Findings of Siqnificance. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment or to curtail the diversity in the environment? — — b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? . (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into / the future. ) _ — — c. Does the project have impacts which are indi- vidually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small , but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant. ) — — d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects / on human beings , either directly or indirectly? Initial Study Prepared By: INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES M r FROM: DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS t&Va NOV 21 1985 SUBJECT: PP 85-38 DAWN/GOLDEY III PARTNERSHIP ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DATE : November 21 , 1985 CITY. OF, PALM DESERT The following should be considered conditions of approval : 1 ) Drainage and signalization fund fees , as required by City ordinance , shall be paid prior to recordation of the final map . 2 ) Drainage facilities shall be provided, per Ordinance No . 218 and the Master Drainage Plan , to the specifications of the Director of Public Works . 3 ) Storm drain construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study by the private engineer that is approved by the Department of Public Works . 4) Full public improvements , including traffic safety lighting and street reconstruction ,as required by ordinance and the Director of Public Works , shall be installed in accordance with City standards . 5 ) Complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted , as required by ordinance, to the City Engineer for checking and approval before construction of any improvements is commenced . The engineer shall submit "as-built" plans prior to the acceptance of the improvements by the City. 6) All private driveways and parking lots shall be inspected by the engineering department and a standard inspection fee shall be paid prior to recordation of the final map. 7) Landscaping maintenance on Hwy 111 , Fred Waring Drive , Painters Path , and along the Palm Valley Storm Channel shall be provided by the property owner . 8) Traffic safety striping on Hwy Ill , Fred Waring Dr . and Painters Path shall be provided to the specifications of the Director of Public Works and the Calif . Dept . of Transpor- tation . A traffic control plan must be submitted to and approved by the Director of Public Works and the California Dept . of Transportation before placing pavement markings . I 9) Complete grading plans and specifications shall be submit- ted , as required by ordinance, to the City Engineer for checking and approval prior to issuance of any permits . 10 ) Dedication of right-of-way on Hwy 111 , Fred Waring Dr , & Painters Path shall be done prior to recordation of the final map. 11 ) Installation of sidewalk on Hwy 111 , Fred Waring Dr . 8 Painters Path . 12 ) Waiver of access to Hwy III , Fred Waring Dr . and Painters Path except at approved locations shall be granted on the final map . 13 ) Close unused driveways with full height curb and gutter . 14) Offsite improvement plans to be approved by Public Works Department and a surety posted to guarantee the required offsite improvements prior to recordation of the final map. 15 ) Full improvement of interior streets based on private street standards as established in accordance with Chapter 26 , Section 26 . 40 . 040 , C . P. D . Code . 16) Installation of one-half landscaped median in Hwy III and Fred Waring Dr . or cash payment for one-half the cost of landscaped median at the option of the Director of Public Works . 17 ) Traffic analysis to be prepared for the project to address the specific impacts on existing networks (street and intersections ) and the proposed mitigation measures recom- mended for approval by the City and the California Depart- ment of Transportation . 18) Size , number and location of driveways to Public Works specifications with only six driveway approaches to be allowed to serve this property . 19) Complete parcel map shall be submitted as required by ordinance to the City Engineer for checking and approval and be recorded before issuance of grading permit . 20) Right-of-way dedication and street improvements along Hwy III shall be in accordance with California Department of Transportation standards and requirements . 21 ) Bus turnout shall be provided at the corner of Fred Waring Dr . and Hwy III to the satisfaction of the City of Palm Desert , California Department of Transportation and Sunline Tra nsit Agency. RiJ . lkers , P. E . RA : RJF/ lo INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM �-+ City off Palm Desert TO: JTBu� Srn/7K N 65oc,4rE f LfFNN62 FROM: L-nsEp# S_ Csqur.", Asscw-t-4TF_ SUBJECT: Fp ,i> GENErevTio.� — ,w. xpEy DATE: PA.Z-TNER- /,Owp - Vs.Ne- riic aTr4GN67 IR�r� GFwRiGAle ! �ai c3 7ME Rotb W�wal� �f�r+4 /s pxou,06a� 232, 370 TOTAL SQ. Fr, SO. G 7-aiP AATE PRIZ /000 66z_Fr 232,37cy (31>. G) V Br2,Ps 2oyi 300 T�»/� sez• 'r. 7-ml P XtiTp- PER 000 Sc -r-r. 2v.y. 3oo[sv�� � Ly338 rz,Ps /000 i SUMMARY OF TRIP GENERATION RATES Land Use/Building Type Rhnnntnv Center onn nnn_2oo 999 G. e R ITE Land Use Code 823— Independent Variable—Trips per 1,000 Gross Square Feet of Leasable Area Average Number Average Size of Trip Maximum Minimum Correlation of Independent Rate Rate Rate Coefficient Studies Variable/Study Average Weekday Vehicle Trip Ends Peak A.M. Enter 0. 4 0. 5 1 0 . 2 Hour Between Exit 0. 2 0. 3 0 . 1 of 7 and 9 Total 0 .6 0 . 8 0 . 3 Adjacent P.M. Enter 2 . 1 2 . 7 1.6 Street Between Exit 2. 2 3.0 Traffic 4 and 6 Total 4 . 8 7. 2 Peak A.M. Enter 2 . 0 2 . 6 1. 8 Hour Exit 2. 2 3. 8 (/ of Total Generator P.M. Enter 2 . Exit Total Saturday Vehicle Trip Ends Peak Enter Hour of Exit Generator Total Sunday Vehicle Trip Ends Peak Enter Hour of Exit Generator Total Source Numbers 3 13 14 , 19 , 48 49, 54 59 72 76 v7 78 g$ inn ITE Technical Committee 6A-6—Trip Generation Rates Date: lg75 , 1Q79 Rev. 198P \ G.S.F. = Gross Square Feet of Leasable Area RIVERSIDE COUNTY 1p�E OF CAUo09y' e lta� FIRE DEPARTMENT " TIN L INCOOPERATIONWITH THE \� A�CO Y`H:�,�.�.'�{,-'-I CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY 7� 'R1Fi RSIDE a' RAY HEBRARD rMEMT of f c FIRE CHIEF 210 WEST SAN JACINTO AVENUE ` PERRIS,CALIFORNIA 92370 December 6, 1985 TELEPHONE:(714)657.3183 Ramon Diaz ��� a Planning and Community Development Director DEC b 1985 City of Palm Desert 73510 Fred Waring ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Palm Desert, CA 92260 CITY. pF PALM DESERT, Reference: PP 85-38 Applicant: Dawn/Golden Dear Mr. Diaz, The following fire protection requirements are in accordance with the Uniform Fire Code and Life Safety Code standards. 1. Install a water system capable of delivering the following, Hotel: 4000 GPM, Casitas units: 2500 GPM, remaining commercial 3000 GPM fire flow from any fire hydrant for a 3 hour duration in addition to domestic supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement. 2. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants so that no point of any building is more than 200 feet from a fire hydrant measured along approved vehicular travel ways . a. exterior surface of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow, and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. b. curbs shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. c. hydrants shall not be located closer than 25 feet to any building. 3. Prior to issuance of a building permit , the developer shall furnish the original and three copies of the water system plan to the Fire Marshal for review. Upon approval, one copy will be sent to the Building Department and the original will be returned to the developer. 4. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and approved by the water company with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system in PP 85-38 is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Fire Marshal." 5. Prior to delivery of combustible materials to the building site, the required water system shall be installed, operating and delivering the required flow. 6. All buildings over 5000 square feet require an N.F.P.A. fire sprinkler system. 7. All fire department sprinkler connections to be within 40' of a fire hydrant and the location approved by the Fire Marshal. 8. All three story buildings require a fire department standpipe system. 9. Hotel will require a State=Fire Marshal approved fire alarm system. 10. Any portion of the underground parking structure beyond .150' of emergency vehicle access must have a standpipe system so all areas can be reached with 150' of fire hose. 11. Porte-cochere: 1316" minimum. 12. All driveway turns are to have a 40' radius minimum. 13. Additional fire protection requirements may be necessary when the applicant submits specific plans for consideration and approval. Very truly yours, RAY HEBRARD Ranger-in-Charge County Fire Chief By&L%k-- (tJ Mike McConnell dpm NA7Eq ESTABLISHED IN 7918 AS A PUBLIC AGENCY ��SiRICS COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT POST OFFICE BOX 1058• COACHELLA, CALIFORNIA 92236•TELEPHONE(619)398-2651 DIRECTORS OFFICERS RAYMOND R.RUMMONDS,PRESIDENT LOW ELL 0.WEEKS,GENERAL MANAGER-CHIEF ENGINEER TELLIS CODEKAS,VICE PRESIDENT BERNARDINE SUTTON,SECRETARY JOHN P.POWELL KEITH H.AINSWORTH,ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGERIAUDITOR PAUL W.NICHOLS REDWINE AND SHERRILL,ATTORNEYS STEVE D.BUXTON November 25, 1981MIM2613 T Department of Environmental Services NOV 2 7 1985 City of Palm Desert Post Office Box 1977 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Palm Desert, California 92261 CITY OF PALM DESERT Gentlemen: Subject: Precise Plan 85-38, Portion of NW'Z, Sec. 19, T5S, R6E, S.B.M. This area is subject to runoff from the mountains to the west. This area is designated Zone B on Federal Flood Insurance rate maps which are in effect at this time. Plans for stormwater protective works shall be submitted to Coachella Valley Water District for review. The District will furnish domestic water and sanitation service to this area in accordance with the current regulations of this District. These regulations provide for the payment of certain fees and charges by the subdivider and said fees and charges are subject to change. This area shall be annexed to Improvement District Nos. 54 and 80 of Coachella Valley Water District for sanitation service. There may be conflicts with existing District facilities. We request the appropriate public agency to withhold the issuance of a building permit until arrangements have been made with the District for the relocation of these facilities. Yours very truly, Lowell 0. Weeks eneral Manager-Chief Engineer CS:ir cc: Riverside County Department of Public Health 46-209 Oasis Street Indio, California 92201 TRUE CONSERVATION Attention: Don Park USE WATER WISELY l _ f ' 46-M PRICXL7 PEAR LANE, PALM DESEF'f, CAUFORNIA S22S0 ITELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 DF 'ZJLDIL�G & SAr?PY T~TS TS Mr A MAN �._Zl KA40 t TO ,�- 'SC�rS RE ANY rTc -� CAN ?s t"Aal AMr_*�NAI. 1Tu1�TIceT Is C 4-"'ys AF T^^r-7j-RAL 1 AN= AND SP �i.'ZCrA.2.71= Qdvr. F.V r1.C. M.=CAL AM H T%S tii Ci 7-. IM G7'� 24 GZ C" s iTL:T LCCl'�'T�.ri:LaQ Q C-ZA-M-" r CRADIIZ ?7r•M DIRECTOR OF BUILDING 6 SAxT_TY .Y ORDINANCE K. 227 1 Page Three EXHIBIT "A" (Continued) . B. Related to Restaurants - Entertainment facilities General offices not exceeding 20% of the gross floor area Appurtenant services and retail shops determined to be available for the con- venience of the patrons of the restaurant or related to the operation of the res- taurants, such as: Art Galleries Automobile Rental Agencies (where five (5) or fewer cars are kept on=site, and no maintenance is performed) Book and Card Shops Clothing and Apparel Shops Convention and Visitors Bureau Gift and Accessories Boutiques (including small antiques) General Medical Care and Services Health, Figure and Exercise Salons and Spas Jewelry Shops Liquor, Beverage and Food Items Shops Luggage Shops Personal Care/Products Shops and Services (including barbering and cosmetology) Sundries Shops (general merchandise) Tour and Ticket Agencies _ Travel Agencies Wearing Item Repair, Tailoring and Cleaning C. Related to Entertainment Facilities - Restaurants Appurtenant services and retail shops determined to be available ) for the convenience of the patrons of the facility and designated as an integral part of the entertain- ment facility D. Similar Uses - The Connmission may permit other uses which it may determine to be similar to those listed above. 3. Section 25.30.240 SHALL READ AS FOLLOWS: 25.30.240 Resort Center Development Standards. The resort center concept is established to provide for the development of low-rise bungalow scale hotel, entertainment, and restaurant facilities with related commercial uses particularly for that area along Highway 111, westerly of the Palm Valley Channel. A development in the PC(4) Zone District shall conform to the following develop- ment standards: A. The minimum site size shall be four (4) acres. B. Hotels shall have a maximum density of thirty (30) units per acre. C. The front yard setback shall be thirty (30) feet.D. The rear yard setback shall be twenty (20) feet.E. The side yard setback shall be fifteen (15) feet. F. The maximum building height shall be thirty (30) feet. G. For hotels, a minimum of forty percent (40%), of the site area shall be developed as usable landscaped open space and outdoor living and recreation area with an adequate irrigation system. If. For other uses, a minimum of twenty percent (20%) of the total site shall be in landscaping. r e ORDINANCE NO '27 _.,l - Page Two EXHIBIT "A" 1. Section 25.30.020 SHALL READ AS FOLLOWS: 25_30_020 Uses permitted by apEoved development plan or . conditional use permit. The following uses are permitted upon approval. A. District Commercial Center (PC2): Such uses include but are not limited to supermarket, professional offices, variety store, drug store, banks, hotel , and restaurants, except drive-in or drive-through; B. Regional Center (PC3): Such uses include but are not limited to supermarket, department stores, banks, variety stores, professional offices, restaurants, except drive-in or drive-through, and general retail uses. C. Resort Center (PC4) Hotels, restaurants, except drive-in or drive-through, entertainment facilities and related commercial uses; D. Specialty Conmrercial Center (PC1): Medical related offices and research facilities, hotel facilities, and ancillary convenience commercial uses. 2. Section 25.30.025 SHALL READ AS FOLLOWS: 25.30.025.Related commercial uses permitted in the Resort Center Zone District. The uses considered to be related commercial uses shall be liberally construed as those uses - customarily connected, associated, and affiliated with the principal uses established for the Resort Center Zone District. The following uses shall be permitted subject to approval as a part of the development plan or conditional use permit: A. Related to Hotels - Restaurants Entertainment facilities Appurtenant services and retail shops determined to be available for the convenience of the guests of the hotel such as: Art Galleries Automobile Rental Agencies (where five (5) or fewer cars are kept ou-site, and no maintenance is performed) Book and Card Shops Clothing and Apparel Shops Convention and Visitors Bureau General Medical Care and Services when provided ancillary to, and in conjunction with the operation of a hotel Gift and Accessories Boutiques (including small antiques) Health, Figure and Exercise Salons and Spas Jewelry shops Liquor, Beverage and Food Items Shops (excluding grocery markets) Luggage Shops Optometrists Office Personal Care/Products Shops and Services (including barbering and cosmetology) - Secretarial Services (including ancillary duplicating services) Sundries Shops (general merchandise) Tour and Ticket Agency Offices Travel Agencies Wearing Item Repair, Tailoring and Cleaning in conjunction with a hotel operation off TF8n T,m 11D®s5®rP-QP 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND CONDMONS OF APPROVAL CASE NON: ---�I%'�/ _ --- -- - -.. ---- APPLICANT: G(JLf Enclosed please find materials describing a project for which the following is being requested: -- -- -�0�✓lJ l�� _ f� ®��/��/ . df- _ Psi tom, _ �� a 3a rxcre av�G -- Lo�+vl�'�1�1�L. d�� Q' ��� �Cd�/� �®`� 1-_ c+.�2r✓G' cc�t` �/ 1� The attached data was prepared by the applicant and is being forwarded to you for comments and recommended conditions of approval. The city is interested in the probable impacts on the environment (including land, air, water, minerals, flora, fauna, noise objects of historical or aesthetic significance) and recommended conditions of approval based on your expertise and area of concern. Your comments and recommended conditions of approval must be received by this office prior to 4:30 p.m. 9F , in order to be discussed by the land division committee. The lad division committee (comprised of director of environmental services, city building official, city engineer, fire marshal and a representative of CVWD) will discuss the comments and recommended conditions of approval and will forward them to the planning commission through the staff report. Any information received by this office after the receipt deadline will not be discussed by the land division committee. Sincerely R MON A. DIAZ DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES - --- RD/lr Attachments PI-EASE R,ETT- PN AAAD WY-ru I^(7�.A%ACk7TC Y Su or tin Data - 1. Name of Appli ant Dawn/Goldey III Partnership 2. This request 's made for property described as: Exact legal description (see attached schedule C) 3. Total area of site: 32.433 acres if more than 1 zone requested, give subtotal for each 4. Existing Zoni g: PC 4 describe here or attach map 5. . Proposed Zoni g: PC 2 descri a here or attach map 6. Assessor's Pa cel No. : 7. The property s located. at Painters Path between Highway III street a dress and Fred Waving Drive and Palm Valle street street Flood Control annel a. The present u e of the property is . vacant 9. General PlanDesignation: 10. The applicant offers the following reasons to justify the request for a Change of Z( Proposed rezone off site from PC4 to PC2 allows for ideal mix of proposed commercial uses and destination hotel uses. There is an extremely strong demand for additional retail shoppi g space in the immediate rezone area. There is only limited retail space available in existing retail centers. The site will also accomodate a major hotel develo nt under a PC2 zone designation. There is also sufficient ro rt zoned PC4 in tie immediate area to absorb projected future demand for hotel development. k k . v 1 t 11. The applican shall submit a minimum of twelve (12) accurate scale drawings of the site (one co ored) and the surrounding area showing: i� - existing streets and property lines - existing tructures - access and utility easements - tOpograph c contours at intervals of not more than two (2) feet. 12. The applicant shall submit a list of all owners of property located within 300 feet of the exterior boundaries of the subject property. The list shall _ be k ncude the name and addressoasnshown onctheolatesthavailablerassessmenthrole�oflthe Riverside County Assessor's Office, 13. The applicant shall submit a completed Environmental Assessment form. 14. The applicant shall provide such additional information as the Director of Environmental Services may require to determine whether the granting of a Change Of Zola would endanger the public health, safety, or general welfare. The application may be filed only by the owner of said property and shall be signed by the owner orb a person with a Power of Attorney, in writing (attached) from the owner authorizing the application or by the Attorney-at-Law for the owner. Indicate your authority be ow: I am the owner of said property. I am the agent for the owner of said property (attach written authorization) . I have a Power of Attorney from the owner authorizing the application I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed at this day of lg 'l :r I 1 In T cY 73-510 FRED WAKING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFOHNIA 92260 TELEPIIONE (619) 346-0611 November 27, 1985 CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE. . I CASE NO. PP 85-38 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a 'public hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by DAWN/GOLDEY PARTNERSHIP :: for approval of a precise plan of design for 204,300 square feet of resort commercial along with a 250 room hotel with 24 caslta units on property zoned resort commercial (PC-4) for a 32 acre parcel at the southwest corner of ;'`'! Highway III and Fred Waring Drive. C1/o r .r.. v V ♦ , ' w 1 "-`'_'1 A. �• T/f u ``' o y,1,I Lr SA V N 'T t t t 1 I-_ d R-1 1_L1J 'k . t i CACTUS AHD S.P t a 2 OC 1 1 , 1 i P. l P.R. 22 FF 1 l�� w A. 1 1 i (4), IRRUSN WCOC O .1 IR it i p PC.;! S.P. _L� L o '' I R I--_ .1210 0' ? ( 11 L 1 I. ... N (4), NITAOQ-'� RL NII N O R r � _ -_ FRED WARING DRIVE '11 p ill tMIT'rl�f Ui 1 ' I P �y•4fvy`+'ti/�r�t� PC. R R A � � .I r ' R-I Ills. ,'i,I+�,'; ' ''♦; Til�tC;r ��^i+7K.{f�1KL�V\. W1 I :' P. p 6 J.P. 1 ' \ ' '/ i •'li i7r�J;'4N�J rat,c!}" i 7IIp` _ . 1 '4 R .I. �A,I,f JE 4RA VISTA A p0 t<Z� l,4 ,y , SUBJECT PROPERTY RBI . ,r,i+ . .♦ )mot {{ y14. ad(it yat1 ' i i '•'•��' \`fl S< }f�Ai),r, �,`\rl i �J2.; ,y p .R-i ., {f. . 'i�.,.'�„I • 1 .}j Tk. I')1 1JCA4i f / LLJ iAMPILU Uh VE 1 V} yw7!- ' C 'n RL1.. II o'!'rii' '�i<� ' ' ri•, t�`.lila ey{'Y <lr} ;i- .y{w d - .- R -I ! •i"i'.I ' ,+e ' ,•Lr �'S? '4+iLr V�-t•71 v Air: , 'I ,� �..�. . . , ♦ems 4 J ry,C E rt't*1 9 �ANCHC CRAA$E 1 1',�i., ,+,;:,lie , �r2^ti'� .{cq Sti• k. 1 i•• li'. t f 5 4 r. / .;•' P.R.-6, S.P. d P.C. (3), S.P. SAID public hearing will be held on Tuesday, December 17, 1985, at 2:00 p.m. In . the Council Chamber at the Palm Desert Civic Center, 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all interested persons are " Invited to attend and be heard. If you challenge the proposed actions in court, you may be limited to raising only those Issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the planning commission (or city council ) att or ' prior to, the public hearing. PUBLISH: Palm Desert Post RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary December 6, 1985 Palm Desert Planning Commission `. ` i I 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 1 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 November 27, 1985 CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE CASE NO. PP 85-38 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by DAWN/GOLDEY PARTNERSHIP for approval of a precise plan of design for 204,300 square feet of resort commercial along with a 250 room hotel with 24 casita units on property zoned resort commercial (PC-4) for a 32 acre parcel at the southwest corner of Highway III and Fred Waring Drive. , SAID public hearing will be held on. Tuesday, December 17, 1985, at 2:00 p.m, in the Council Chamber at the Palm Desert Civic Center, 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. If you challenge the proposed actions in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the planning commission (or city council ) at, or prior to, the public hearing. PUBLISH: Palm Desert Post RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary December 6, 1985 Palm Desert Planning Commission 640-020-004-4 640-150-047 Moller, Paul S. Martin, Purvis & Deva 72235 Painters Path 550 Washington St. #529 Palm Desert, CA 92260 San Diego, CA 92103 640-020-005 640-150-046 Far West Services, Inc. Triphon, Daphne 2701 Alton St. 1713 Sandpiper Irvine, CA 92713 j Palm Desert, CA 92260 640-020-006 640-150-048 Cal West Real Estate Fund 80 Harris Enterprises, Inc.. AUGUST FIN CORP LOS SOMBRAS i 1717 S.W. Madison St. P.O. Box 22630 Portland, OR 97205 Long Beach, CA 90801 640-080-004EX 640-150-049 CVCWD Mathieson, Peter M. P.O. Box 1058 1716 Sandpiper Coachella, CA 92225 Palm Desert, CA 92260 i 640-080-006EX l 640-150-045 CVCWD Magie Davis P.O. Box 1058 1712 Sandpiper Coachella, CA 92225 Palm Desert, CA 92260 i 640-080-002 640-150-044 Moss, Pat & Michael Illinois Forbes 2444 Fair Acres 72221 El Paseo #1711 j St. Louis, MO 63136 Palm Desert, CA 92260 640-080-003-9 640-150-043-1 Moss, Pat & Michael Austin Birsdois 2444 Fair Acres 5301 Malibu Dr. St. Louis, MO 63136 Minn MN 55436 i 640-080-005 640-150-042 H.F. Ahmanson & Co. Westly & Pat Borten 3731 Wilshire Blvd. 2270 Stanly Ave. Los Angeles, CA 90010 JI Signalhill, CA 90806 i ,I _ I 640-110-002 640-150-050 Boler, John W. I Races Equipment Co. j 4001 13th Ave. S. P.O. Box 693 Fargo, ND.58103 San Jose, CA 95106 1 ) 640-110-007 640-150-051 l ! , H.F. Ahmanson& Co. James Wilson 3731 Wilshire Blvd. 1718 Sandpiper Los Angeles, CA 90010 Palm Desert, CA 92260 640-110-001 i I . Hatch, Robert A. P.O. Box 3007 Salt Lake City, UT 84130 640-020-00474 640-150-047 Moller, Paul S. Martin, Purvis & Deva 72235 Painters Path 550 Washington St. #529 Palm Desert, CA 92260 San Diego, CA 92103 640-020-005 640-150-046 Far West Services, Inc. Triphon, Daphne 2701 Alton St. 1713 Sandpiper Irvine, CA 92713 Palm Desert, CA 92260 640-020-006 Cal West Real Estate Fund 80 640-150-048 AUGUST FIN CORP. LOS SOMBRAS Harris Enterprises, Inc. P.O. Box 22630 1717 S.W. Madison St. Long Beach, CA 90801 Portland, OR 97205 640-080-004EX 640-150-049 CVCWD Mathieson, Peter M. P.O. Box 1058 1716 Sandpiper Coachella, CA 92225 Palm Desert, CA 92260 640-080-006EX 640-150-045 CVCWD Magie Davis P.O. Box 1058 1712 Sandpiper Coachella, CA 92225 Palm Desert, CA 92260 640-080-002 640-150-044 Moss, Pat & Michael Illinois Forbes 2444 Fair Acres 72221 E1 Paseo #1711 St. Louis, MO 63136 Palm Desert, CA 92260 640-080-003-9 640-150-043-1 Moss, Pat & Michael Austin Birsdois 2444 Fair Acres 5301 Malibu Dr. St. Louis, MO 63136 Minn, MN 55436 640-080-005 640-150-042 H.F. Ahmanson & Co. Westly & Pat Horten 3731 Wilshire Blvd. 2270 Stanly Ave. Los Angeles, CA 90010 Signalhill, CA 90806 640-110-002 640-150-050 Boler, John W. Races Equipment Co. 4001 13th Ave. S. P.O. Box 693 Fargo, ND 58103 San Jose, CA 9510 640-110-007 640-150-050 H.F. Ahmanson Races Equipment Co. 3731 Wilshire Blvd. P.O. Box 693 Los Angeles, CA 90010 San Jose, CA 95106 640-110-001 0-051 Hatch, Robert A. 640-15 Wilson P.O. Box 3007 James Wilson Salt Lake City, UT 84103 1718 Sandpiper Palm Desert, CA 92260 IRVINE SOILS ENGINEERING,INC, SOIL ENGINEERING A I:N(.INEERING GEOL:G+ January 21, 1981 I Vista Development Corporation Job No: 2109-00 4001 Birch Street Log No: 1-3854 Newport Beach, California 92606 Attention: Mr. Bill Gray SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION , Palm Desert Racquet Club 44th Avenue and Highway ill Palm Desert, California I l Gentlemen: This report presents the results of our Pre1nary Geotechnical 1 Investigation at the subject site. Our inveftiaation was per- formed in December 1980 and January 1981 andlconsisted of field exploration, laboratory testing, review of pertinent maps and literature, geotechnical analysis of the field and laboratory j data, and the preparation of this report. 11 DESCRIPTION OF SITE The subject site consists of approximately .30 acres locate2 at the base of the San Jacinto Mountains within the Coachella Valley in Palm Desert, California. This irregularly-shaped parcel is bounded on the north by 44th Avenue, on the east by State Highway lll,on the south by the Palm Valley Flood Control Channel and on ' the west by Painters Path. The site is relatively level with sur- face drainage generally to the north and east. At the time of our field investigation, no water was present within the flood 1 control channel. The location and geographic relationships of the site. are shown on the Location Map, Figure 1. 1J ' SUBSIDIA14Y OF IRVINE CONSULTING GROUP.I:I•: 18= SKY PARK CIRCLE, SUITE G - iRViNE. CA 92714 9 17141 S40-7733 4a C w.uwon i wa, �y '•+•,• ' '• ',�': A River I ,ti f� • • .• GF A .\ "Y .•Cop ,� I O V R S f F f' Rancho Mrtaga4won •• woo , ` •�• •�• • •• ` - I�� =,alibi 9 . .' w i I ; nw•i : ',``� �`, ,. I \ �. I •' r ' r" q. y_ `•�IN 7f1•lir.w .,'.., ^_ ..�• /• �. �', T :re... / ja • , ' 7. {yam •+ � .� w w �� as ,�, ` r....�..1 ...w a� w. 11i i1. •�. 'i�> '\ •i . a `�• OM', U '\ fin, r01•I L�r •J AL vz- _;,^/�:..%;�"� ;, \�L\ ;i •=`1�_. �'�-,` :•+: ,:' • '� :(;L= • Palm.t,.,, ' :�: il'Sr,A :!(i`. -.t11�. .= `�/S�f�•`• ••'��?�, � � s f''m' 1!. _ f �'� 11`( J' II �4' 7i�s , <t p�„�,�+L�'t ..r�l»«.:1� • ..... ,�.,C 0 u N•5 E •0 2000 soon Adapted from U.S.G.S. 7.5' Rancho Mirage SCALE IN FEET Quadrangle, 1972 LOCATION MAP Joe No: DATE= FIGURE. 109-00 JANUARY 1 81 .,....•.. ..,.. n e•Inlsleenwn Isle. Vista Development Corporation. Job No: 2109-00 January 21, 1981 Log No: 1-3854 Page Two The entirre site was graded in the early 1970's. Grading con- sisted, generally, of cuts and fills of less than 5 feet. As part of our investigation, we reviewed the •Geotechnical Inves- tigation, Proposed Townhouse Development, Tentative Tract 4489, Palm Desert, County of Riverside, California. . .• , dated July 14 , 1972, prepared by Geotechnical Consultants, Inc. we also re- viewed a copy of the Grading Plan for the previous ,site grading, contained in the files of the Department of Building and Safety, County of Riverside. A compaction report for' the grading could not be located. Presently, existing building pads and rough graded streets are present over the entire site. On . the north portion of the site, curbs and gutters; water mains and fire hydrants have been in- stalled. The site is covered,with a sparse to moderate growth of weeds. �.. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT We understand that the site will be developed into a hotel-res- taurant-tennis facility. Rooms and suites will be located in three-story clusters over partial subterranean parking garages. We understand that parking garage subgrade will range from 2 to 5 . feet below.existing site grades. Column loads for these struc- tures are anticipated to be on the order of 300 to 450 kips per square foot with line loads on the order of 3.5 to 4.5 kips per lineal foot. A three-story hotel lobby; health club and restau- rant building is also planned. We understand that this building will be constructed at approximate existing site grades. Antici- pated loads for this building were not available when this report .was prepared but are anticipated to be simular to those for the clusters over parking garages. A single_story, relatively light conference center is also proposed to be constructed at approxi- mate existing site grades. Additional development will consist, Vista Development Corporation Job No: 2109-00 ,.� January 21, 1981 Log Not 1-3854 Page Three generally, of tennis courts and other recreation facilities. We anticipate that grading will consist of cuts and fills with maxi- mum depths of ' 10 feet or less. FIELD EXPLORATION Subsurface conditions were explored by drilling ten borings to depths of . 16 to 81 feet. The approximate locations of the bor- ing$ are shown on the attached Plot Plan, Figure 4. The borings were drilled with a truck-mounted rotary wash auger, Drilling of the test borings was supervised by our. Field Geologist who logged the soils and obtained bulk and undisturbed samples for laboratory testing. LABORATORY TESTING A. Classification Soils were classified visually according to the Unified Soil Classification System. Classification was supplemented by index tests, such as No. 200 Sieve Tests and Sand-Equivalent Tests. Moisture content and dry density determinations were made for each undisturbed sample. Results of mbisture-density determinations, together with classifications, are shown on the Logs of Borings, Figures 5 through 21. Results of No. 200 Sieve Tests, performed in accordance with ASTM: 0 1140-71, are presented on Figure 22, Table 1. Re- sults of Sand-Equivalent Tests, performed in accordance with ASTM: 0 2419-740 are presented on Figure 22, Table 2. Vista Development Corporation Job No: 2109-00 January 21, 1981. Log No: 1-3854 Page Four B. Maximum Dry Density/Optimum Moisture Content The maximum dry density/optimum moisture content relation- ship was determined for typical samples of the on-site soils. The laboratory standard used was ASTM: D 1557-78 . The test results are summarized on Figure .221 Table 3 . C. Sulfate Content Sulfate tests were performed on representative samples of the on-site soils. The test results are summarized on Figure 23, Table 4. D.. R-Value AnR-Value test was performed on a representative sample of the on-site surface soils to provide data for pavement design. The test result is summarized on Figure 23, Table 5. E. Direct Shear Direct shear strength tests were performed on undisturbed and remolded (to 90 percent compaction) samples of the on-site soils. To simulate possi4le adverse field condi- tions, the samples were saturated prior to shearing. A saturating device was used w$ich permitted the samples to absorb moisture while preventing volume change. The test results are presented on Figures 24 through 26. F. Consolidation Consolidation tests were performed on representative undis- turbed samples of the underlying soils to ;help' determine y compressibility characteristics. The samples were saturated Vista Development Corporation Job No: 2109-00 y.� January 21, 1981 Log No: 1-3854 Page Five mid-way through the tests to simulate possible adverse field conditions. The test results are presented on Figures 27 through 31. GEOTECHNICAL SETTING The site is located within the Coachella Valley portion of the Penninsular Ranges Geomorphic Province. Locally, the site is underlain by alluvium, deposited within the valley by the White Water River. The alluvium consists, generally, of medium dense to very dense silty and gravelly sands to the maximum depth ex- plored of 81 feet. The alluvium is overlain across the northern two-thirds of the site by man-made fill soils,discussed previously in thin report. The fill soils consist, generally, of moderately compact silty and gravelly sands. Groundwater.was not�encountered ' in our subsurface exploration. Records provided by the California Department of Water Resources indicate ,that groundwater levels in 1975, in the vicinity of the subject site, were between 140 and 150 feet below the ground 'surface. SEISMICITY The site is considered a seismically active area, as is all of Southern California. There are, however, no active faults on or . adjacent to the site. Seismic risk is considered moderate to high as compared. to some areas of Southern California because of the proximity to active faults and the historic earthquake record. Seismic hazards within the site can be attributable to ground shaking resulting from events on nearby active faults. . Listed on Table I are the active and potentially active faults in the area 1 which can significantly affect the site. Figures 2 and 3 show the geographic relationship of these, faults to the site. i ve r Yv g � g }{ O •��a'"O �,Y je3 » Y ��•�i G YG ch • aen O H i,= A -0 E .9 J Z u CPO �d 5 $ we m .D o "a3=saa3s � � WO J 0 ., " 8arE g . ss as LLI us Sm v�y .'iv ig► n 21 8m s= r Y r V 0 W� m gm� 1:0 s: _� o Q QS.Y •Y Y�rCb S iJ- Z w 3� i Zcr. _ LU 0 " a 3 U LL Nam : 3� o — O »w . . E W J O =3 s s: $ cQ Q s• f 3 � e � .d e z It • GV < 3 .41 �g E ZZ J 3 �• v? e �Q X a as 1st uj $ > � = W , = i $jam W 03 Yt_ = I� i �$l .e C a TCL O = LLI •_. I==Go m a QZLLOCEY . s W — oa og s H 9 � X Y ` O LCY2 SZ a 6q`;` a • $ Y V= _ . 33 i a REGIONAL FAULT MAP KEY fiauRL + Joe N nc:.nn oATL JANUARY teal / lot —� Refer to Figure 2 for Explanation $Gale: t Inch=20 mlles" 1947 Q , .ti »1ti'•.,iiw{tow `ti !�i•rw51• t " p R 0 1 N 0 0A. �t a lost .. �•� Itor 1►+ur. . TMpt„awC s 1949 • /� /:� a �.. Isle . Is '+' r sw� '� � ' ti Mu R SITE—* E less lip 1937 Indus r• Isla ' ~•.tik Yt2 •~•�t auk f�4 ''�tr \ � •� .b My •�� a411 1094 MI "�. yroS , .4K leee M:j N Mia '''� �°i� REGIONAL FAULT MAP 1 FIGURE: Joe No. GATE: N R 19 1 3 3%9.00 lnv�Ne It ENoINfERlNO. IN: n vista Development Corporation Job No: 2109-00 J January 21, 1981 Log No: 1-3854 j Page Six Earthqudke epicenters (exceeding 6 on the Richter Scale of Mag- nitude) within a 50-mile radius of this project, are listed be- low. RICHTER' APPROXIMATE DISTANCE DATE MAGNITUDE SITE TO EPICENTER FAULT 12/25/1899 7+ 40 NE San Jacinto 4/21/1918 6.8 30 W San Jacinto 7/23/1923 6.3 50 NW San Jacinto 3/25/1937 6.0 20 SW San Jacinto . 12/4/1948 6.5 13 N San Andreas . (Mission Creek) 1949 6.0 40 NE Pinto Mountain 12/12/1954 6.2 30 SE 'San Jacinto 1968 6.5 40 SE Coyote Creek EARTHQUAKE EFFECTS A. Settlement of Soils The soils underlying the site consist primarily of granular alluvial materials, which could settle during seismic events. However, the amount of settlement is not considered signi- ficant. Any loose/soft soils will be removed during grading. B. Liquefaction The soils underlying the site have a very low to non-existent potential for liquefaction due to the extreme depth to ground- water. I ' 1 1 i Vista Development Corporation Job No: 2109-00.. ^ January 21, 1981 Log No: 1-3854 1 `,J Page Seven C. Lurching and Shallow Ground Rupture Breaking of the ground due to active faulting is not likely on the site because of the absence of active faults. Crack- ing of the ground due to shaking from distant events is not considered a significant hazard, although it is a possibility at any site. D. Tsunamis The site will not be inundated by a tsunami, due to •its distance from the coast. E. Earthquake Accelerations We have analyzed the possible earthquake accelerations at the site and determined that, for the intended use, the most significant event is a 7.5 Magnitude earthquake on the San. Andreas Fault Zone. The accelerations produced at the site by such an event .would exceed those of events on any other known fault. A Magnitude 7.5 earthquake in close proximity to the site could produce a peak ground acceleration of 0.38g at the site, with the duration of strong motion shaking exceeding 30 seconds. Repeatable high ground accelerations, for this site,' ars estimated to be on the order of 0.25g. De- sign of structures should be- in accordance with governing jurisdictions and standard practices of the Structural En- gineers Association of California. Vista Development Corporation Job- No: 2109-00 ^ January 21, 1901 Log No: 1-3854 t ✓ Page Eight CONCIUSMS AND RECOMMENDATIONS A. General The proposed development, is feasible from a geotechnical standpoint. The grading' and foundation plans should take into account the appropriate soils engineering features of the site. B. Site Grading ' 1. Site Clearing The site should be cleared of existing vegetation and miscellaneous debris. Holes resulting from the re- moval of buried obstructions, such as existing under- ground utilities which extend below finished site grades, should be backfilled with compacted fill. 2. Preparation of Surface Soils The soils below the partial subterranean parking gar- ages and below the three-story hotel lobby, health club and restaurant building and to 5 feet beyond in each direction should be removed to a depth of 3 feet below finished grades. The soils below the conference center and to 5 feet beyond should be removed to a depth of 2 feet below finished grade. 'The soils below the on-grade .tannis courts should be removed to a depth of 1 foot below finished grade. If loons natural soils or moderately compact previously placed fill .soils extend below the proposed depths of • removal, additional removals, down to medium dense ([ natural soils, should •be performed. Vista Development Corporation Job No: 2109-00 January 21, 1981 Log No: 1-3854 Page Nine Prior to fill placement, the exposed natural soils should be scarified to a depth of 1 foot, moistened to near optimum moisture content and compacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction. Alternatively, the soils specified above may be den- sified by surface compaction techniques such as vibra- tory rolling. if vibratory rolling is- selected, a test program should be completed prior to grading to ensure that the desired densification can be achieved utilizing the specific equipment selected by the grad- ing contractor. 3. Compaction and Method*Of Pilling Fill should be moistened or dried* ty near optimum con-. J ditions and compacted in uniform lifts to a'minimum relative compaction of 90 percent based upon ASTM Test U Designation D 1557-78. 4. Material for Pill The existing on-site soil materials are suitable for use as fill. Pill material should, in general, not contain organics or rock fragments greater than, 6- inches in largest dimension. • 5. Shrinkage and Subsidence A volume shrinkage of 20 to 25 percent may be used for P soils placed as. compacted fill. A ground subsidence of 0.2 feet should be used due to recompaction of sur- face soils. I •� J Vista Development Corporation Job No: 2109-00 January 21, 1981 Log No: 1-3854 Page Ten 1 C. Foundations 1. Three-Story Clusters Over Subterranean Garages and Three-Story Hotel Lobby, Health Club and Restaurant k structure ' These structures may be supported on conventional ' continuous and/or. apread footings bearing in approved compacted fill soils. The recommended allowable bear- ing pressures for footings founded at a depth of 2 feet below lowest adjacent finished grade are 2,500 ' pounds per square foot for continuous footings and 3,000 pounds per square foot for square footings. These values are for dead plus live load and may be increased one-third for combinations of vertical and U - . _...._.hcxiIo tat forces. If footings are supported and sized as recommended, total settlement is not expected to exceed one-half-inch and differential settlements are not expected to exceed one-Fourth-inch. 2. Conference Center This structure may be supported on conventional con- tinucus and/or spread footings bearing in approved com- pacted fill soils. The recommended allowable bearing pressure for footings founded at least one foot below lowest adjacent finished grade is 1,500 pounds per square toot for both continuous and spread footings. 4. This value is for dead plus live load and may be in- creased one-third for combinations of vertical and hori- zontal forces. if footings are supported and sized as recommended, total settlement is not expected to exceed one-half-inch and differential settlements are not ex- pected to exceed one-fourth-inch. Vista Development Corporation Job No: 2109-00 January 21, 1981 Log NO: 1=3854 Page Eleven D. Recommended Lateral Pressure A lateral bearing value, cf 300 pounds per square foot per foot of depth and coefficient of friction between concrete and foundation soil o! '0.45 may be assumed. i E. Concrete Slabs-On-Grade Concrete slabs-on-grade -should be designed by the Structural Engineer utilizing a modulus of subgrade reaction of 300 pounds per square inch per inch. Slabs may be placed di- rectly on compacted native soils. Where moisture sensitive floor coverings are planhed, the siabs should be underlain by a 6-mil visqueen moisture bar- iier with 1-inch of clean sand placed between th slab and visqueen. F: Asphaltic Concrete Pavement Based an an x-Value of 52, •the following asphaltic concrete pavement section is recommended for preliminary design pur- poses: 3-inches asphaltic concrete placed in two lifts on compacted native subgrade Pavement subgrade soils should be compacted to at least 95 percent relative compaction to a depth of 12-inches. The pavement section should be confirmed after. grading is com- _ i pleted by additional A-Value tests. G. Type Cement for Construction The existing surface soils are not harmful to concrete con- taining ordinary Type i or Type II cement. i Vista Development Corporation Job No: 2109-00 January 21, 1981 PageNTwelve854 H. estainina walls Retaining walls r6"i'ng `leve1 backfill should be designed for the following soil parameters: EQUIVALENT EQUIVALENT SOIL HLUID'.-PRESSURE (pcf) FLUID PRESSURE (pcf) TYPE (UNRESTRAINED WALLS) (RESTRAINED WALLS) Ono-site soils "'+ ..':': 30 40 Walls which will be subjected- to surcharge loads should be designed for an additional active pressure to be determined by the Soils Engineer after analysis of the proposed wall and particular site conditions. .Walls should be adequately drained to prevent build-up of hydrostatic pressures. Footings should be designed in accor- dance with the previously stated foundation recommendations. -V The use of heavy compaction equipment in close proximity to retained walls can cause excessive wall movement and/or earth pressure in excess of wall designs. This opportunity to be of. service is appreciated. If you have any . questions, please call. very truly yours, IRVINE SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. i Michael Mil or* R.C.E.28110 eGatV;F. Stoney, C.E.G. 38 senior Engineer Principal Geologist Enclosures: Location Map, Figure 1 Regional Fault Map Kay, Figure 2 Regional Fault Map, Figure 3 Plot Plan, Figure 4 Logs of Borings, Figures 5 through 21 Laboratory Test Data, :.Figures 22 through 31 r 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO(S): 5 ___ PROJECT: s APPLICANT: �,Cjj.ULf /�'., /..✓����-_-�.�.���F,�S�-,� Enclosed please find materials describing a project for-which the following Is being requested: — � - - - � Off- _ Psi "c re- ley- S Ccn /4L c aS /C�Dv^� �o to L- c�erc" cti�'1 � 2y The attached data was prepared by-the-applicant-and- is being forwarded to you for comments and recommended conditions of approval. The city is interested in the probable impacts on the environment (including land, air, water, minerals, flora, fauna, noise objects of historical or aesthetic significance) and recommended conditions of approval based on your expertise and area of concern. Your comments and recommended conditions of approval must be received by this office prior to 4:30 p.m. �P� �,tA,g � in order to be discussed by the land division committee. The land division committee (comprised of director of environmental services, city building official, city engineer, fire marshal and a representative of CVWD) will discuss the comments and recommended conditions of approval and will forward them to the planning commission through the staff report. Any information received by this office after the receipt deadline will not be discussed by the land division committee. Sincerely R MON A. DIAZ DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES RD/lr Attachments P1_FACF RETIMM L(AD ,ViTu rnu uv,,rx .i Dawn/Gol'dey III Partnership ��yKam ' -ueas_e arm,I 4320 La Jolla Village Drive Suite 250 619-457-1676 `�mun; _ac•-•• Teleonons San Diego California 92122 :.ry Slate Lo-:cae. -=:j Jescrme saetlfic nature of cocrovcl rsauuted 1. Rezone PC(4) to PC(2) 'cCPERTr DESCRIPTION: See attached.' LSSESSCR'S 1ARC l NO, X157ING ZONING PC(4) -ncs•'. ;-.her LWnor4anon The undenianed roles r t they are Ina aener lsl of me ofOaerty described herein and neleoy give autnar• � i¢allon for I Ili g of this abdication. - L�(j�,��/ ��5 U nature Oats i / agnem enr absolving the City a! Polm Desert of all IICDllirles relative to any deed restrictions, CC BY MY SIGNATURE ON THIS AGREEMENT, ADaolve City of Palm Do"" at all hablllllet regarding any deed restnvions mot rnpv be aWhCaDb b me orogerty described Main. S ig nolUre Date LadbCnl s signature r ��• Signature Date / n, USE ONLY) Environmental Status Accepted by: ❑ Minisnnol act E.A. No. ❑ Negative Declaration CASE LS Hot, - ❑ Crnsr Reference Case No. .K�.Ury Hw'COI.n bibs) •• CERTIFIED PROPERTY OWNERS' LIST AFFIDAVIT n F '' STATE OF LALIFORMA ` ) St F ,h ey F COl1NTY OF VRIVERSIDE ) CITY OF. PALM DESERT ) rt I • IlkF— `� , hereby certify tfi'a;t the; attache list contains the names and addresses of all persons to '-whom. all property is assessed as they appear on the latest•available assess- ment$ role' of the County within the area described on the attached application ano-Tor a distance of three hundred (300) .feet from the exterior boundaries of the 'property described on the attached application. I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. - (signed) i r (date) S 619 452 9209 DCNWiDRWN. . . . . . . 16 cn EXACT LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (S Copies) The land referred to in this policy is situated in the State of California,lCounty of Riverside, City of Palm Desert, and is described alp follows: Lots 1 through 75 inclusive, and Lots A, B and C of Tract 4489-1 as shown by Map on file in Book 79 page 38 through 42, inclusive, of Maps, Records of Riverside County, California. Lots 1 through 175 inclusive, and Lots A, B and C of Tract 4489 as shown by Map on file in Book 83 pages 34 through 40 inclusive, Qf Maps, Records of Riverside County, California. I i i i i i i Legal Description Approved by: i Date: 'I I i S 619 452 9209 DCN1W/DAWN. . . . . . . ...'. _.,.".^.'"^"„","'",'.'.....- "..�,. 02 CASE NO. Environmental Assessment Form TO THE APPLICANTi Your cooperation in completing this form and supplying the information requested will expedite City review of your application pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. The City is required to make an environmental assessment on all projects which it exercises discretionary approval over. Applications submitted will not be considered complete until all information necessary to make the environmental assessment is complete. GENERAL INFOR14AT.ION: 1 . Name, address, and telephone number of owner, applicant or project sponsor: uawn/Goldey III Partnership, 4320 La Jolla Villa& Drive, Suite 250, San Diego, CA. 92122 2. Name, address and telephone number of person to be Contacted con- cerning the project (such as architect, engineer, or other repre- sentati ve) i ,David A. Bateman, Suite 501, Security Building Olyffpia, Washington 98501 3. Common name of project (if any): 4. Project location (street address or general location) : Southwest corner State Highway III and Fred Waring 5. Precise legal description of property (lot and tract number, or meets & bounds) : See attached. 6.. Proposed use of the site (project for which the form is filed; describe the total undertaking, not just the current application approval being sought): Development and operation of a general retail commercial shopping center and destination resort t hfltP1 alnng ' with supporting services. S 619 452 9209 DCNW/DAWN. . . . . . . :. .. . .-.,:<,�.",........:.,:. .,.. . .: 03 7. Relationship to a larger project or series of projects (describe how this P oject relates to other activities, p�h�ases��, and develop- ments plan4led, or now underway) : No known relAgnsFiip.. I 8. List and d scribe any other related permits and other public approvals required f.r this project, to go forward, including those required by the City, Regional , State and Federal agencies (indicate sub- sequent approval agency name, and type of approval required) : pity of Palau Desert Rezone Precise Plan Approval, Building Permits EXISTING C�NOITIONS: 9. Project site area: 32.433 acres Size of property in sq. ft. or acreage 10. Present zoning; PC(4) (Proposed zoning): PC(2) 11 . General Plan land use designation: 12. Existing u}e of the project site: vacant 13. Existing u�e on adjacent properties: (Example —North, Shopping Center; South, Sin le Family Dwellings; East, Vacant, etc. ). North - Lhoing Center; South - Draina e East - Gas 'Station and Vacant; West - Vacant I 14. Site topography (describe) : elat 15. Are there 4ny natural or manmade drainage channels through or Palm Valley Channel adjacent tb the property? NO YES x abutting south property line 16. Grading (e!;timate number of cubic yards of dirt being moved) 45,000 +f- 17. List the n.Umber, size and type of trees being removed: none 18. Describe Oy cultural , historic, or scenic aspects of the project S1 to:--ndn I,nA.,Stppd - I S 619 452 9209 DLNW/DRWH. . . . . . . 19. Residential Project (if not residential do NOT answer) A. Number and type of dwelling units (Specify no. of bedrooms) : B. Schedu a of unit sizes: C. Number of stories Height feet. D. Largest single building (sq. ft. ) (hgt. ) E. Type 01f household size expected (population projection for the project) : F. Descriibe the number and type of recreational facilities: G. II Is th re any night lighting of the project: H. RangeFofsales prices or rents : $ to $ I . Percetotal project devoted to: Build ng . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Pavin , including streets. . . . . . . . . . . . Lands aping, Open, Recreation Area . . . . . . . a eiy co[ yzey DCNWiDPWN. . . . . . . - 05 20. Commercial , I Industrial , Institutional or Other Pro,iect: A. Type o use(s) and major function(s) (if offices, specify type 8 number): Retail cortmercial shopping center and destination resort hotel with support services. B. Number of square feet in total building area: retail - 232,370; hotel complex - 236,240 C. Number of stories 3 Height 35 feet. D. Largest single building (Sq. Ft. ) 60,000 (Hgt. ) 30 E. Numbers of square feet in outdoor storage area: 2,400 F. Total numberof required parking spaces 1,480 , numbet provided 1,491. G. Hours of Operation: Hote 24 hours, retail 9 a.m. to 9 p.m. (?) H. Maxim m, number of clients, patrons , shoppers, etc. , at one time: I . Maxim m number of employees at one time: retail - 450; hotel 50 J. If pa ron seating is involved, state the number: K. Is th re any night lighting of the project: Yes x No L. Perce t of total project devoted to: Buil ing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 % Pavirjg, including streets. . . . . . . . . 53 Land taping and Open Space (Recreation). . 22 X 619 452 9209 DCNU/DAWN. . . . . . . Are the foll wing items applicable to the project or its effects : Discuss belo all items checked yes (attach additional sheets as necessary) . YES NO 21 . Change in a isting features of hillsides, or substanti 1 alteration of ground contours. _ 22. Change in t e dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in the proj ct vicinity. X 23. Subject to r resulting in soil errosion by wind or flooding X 24. Change in g ound water quality or quantity, or alteration f existing drainage patterns. _ 25, Change in a isting noise or vibration level in the vicinit . Subject to roadway or airport noise (has he required acoustical report been submitted?) X 26. Involves t e use or disposal of potentially hazardous aterials, such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives. X 27. Involves t e use of substantial amounts of fuel or en rgy. X 28. Changes th demand for municipal services (police, f re, sewage, etc. ) X 29. Changes th demand for utility services., beyond those pres ntly available or planned in the near futur X 30. Significan ly affects any unique or natural features, including mature trees. X 31 . Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residentiII areas or public land or public roads. X 32. Results il the dislocation of people. X S 619 452 9209 DCNW/DP"". . . . . . . • 0 7'i YES NO 33. Generates co troversy based on aesthetics or other featur s of the project, x [ J Addit onal explanation of "yes" answers attached. SCE. 'iCr1'110N: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above �attach d exhibits present the data and information required Irtis initial valuation, to the best of my ability, and that the , . statements and information presented are true and correct to the r c;y,knowle ge and belief. t Golde III Dawn/Golder III Partnership vme Prin or Type For October 11, 1115 ign to Date INITIAL STUDY FEE: $30.00 (Make check payable to the City of Palm Desert and sub— mit with this form. ) MAP INDEX OVERLAY 6K 640 _ Q) B]F a w F.FF � a h g n T ^' N w i b �O w ='I Ql 00 fIMM.1VLM qp Ir w at I 1 w O //^1I V a ,A ) \ V '4 41sJCr C,/Y ✓mIK fZYrn ,irt li/ dy :..mils P is q I ne ".� •� o w • G g I � V` `• I e k 1 h M1 O f h. J< JJ _ 4 �jIe m 4 � O � �n YJ' GL•, .� � lV N / CCC �O M 99 i + 4G p�C u ti I p oG O la * 9 0 w / I lyi JSill ^ N FF Y M JB��f W ti V b u '! M � SBJ oI n0 w j O I Rwx AN W R Sk' Ciry turn 41 w N POM D"e R.6E Ciry L: ,n d 2 at�/ 4-11 %J• �s v Ba O �L Y a I� n n 0 00 �b O� d A If //9d Ob9V8 dvn 5'&OSS3SSV 8166/ dD{y /aDJvd 9-olpel Nd e*68/ ON /.7Dll 09 -99/f£/ 8W '»'sysiiw £ZLS/ ObW la-?/Od Z-/IZ9 Nd s in tx urc S rx 3'x xrl -„t f0 vff O V �S W , I S 9ii . >V S6 Ji I it gyp' z`h'FLI B /OJ 11, f >0'61r I I ' \ \ / �In IN OOliI IN SP9/'O �u µ D/ Z/ O � J asb n [ /o] X6F0, IP eiy o4 p V 0 / 14f b/ OO,SJxI 0 .� i bKtlM 0 Ft vs 4 b d/ 4 \ 60 o :fivF'e h. I O y v188 \ os os a w \ T�vHrO \ ixoy, r re..w v vsa " 6 AI a�tx��e6pw C 61, ro7 WIN 00 ea aIo 39Y'Y-91 `61 ?39ell V YOd //.. _0P9 6eo -9/0 r8l r L'r FOR SEC.19, T55,R6E TPA 018-006 640 - /5 - - .\,00 d Ad ®5 5 a �I J s° .J > 20 f^� 3 0 15 23dP� ( t je F�q 15 � i �• i 29 „ gt 31 3 O Z O O d 15 6 ♦°a IZ s 13 I a o•° O O 2 .25 � y° � � 1� ° !� 10 N Z4 aw S le ^a OOno . 9 O � � 9 Ye �a. B\ d e eV" Y S 2 y O 4 ''s,'as•w ast aona .rYr - ya � b 0 ye 6 _ ' R5 39158 ( Ig a ♦� 3753 MB63/49-50 Mod No.3882 F4 A.DESSQ4'S MAP SK 640 PG 15 _ MIVERS/CE CaW7Y, CALIF aP — 1 j C� i 26 6 I - sue_ - - { i f i I i I ; I ! . � . li r I Su artin •D ta : 1. . Name of Appli ant Dawn/Goldey III Partnership 2. This request 's made for property described as: Exact ega descript on (see attached schedule C) 3. Tota .1 area Of Site: 32.433 acres f more than 1 zone requested, give su tota for each 4. Existing Zoni g: PC 4 describe ere or attach map 5. . Proposed Zoni g: PC 2 (describe here or attach map 6. Assessor's Pa cel No. : 7. The property s located. at Painters Path between 9 ay III street address and Fred Waving Drive and Palm Valley street street 8. The present use of the property is . vacant Flood control 9. General PlanDesignation: 10. The applicant offers the following reasons to ,justify the request for a Change of Zc Proposed rezo a off site fran P C4 to PC2 allows for id eal mix of proposed camiercial uses and destination hotel uses. There is an extremely stron demand for additional retail shoppi g space in the immediate rezone area. There is onl -Limited retail space available in existing retail centers. The site will also accomodate a major hotel devel ant under a PC2 zone designation. There is also sufficient ro rt zoned PC4 in e immediate area to absorb projected future demand for hotel " development. 5J b .. .. _ may.♦ .. . .. r .pPyJa4rf.LtYly _ i . . il. The applican .sndll submit a minimum of twelve (12) accurate scale drawings of the site (one co ored) and the surrounding area showing: i" - existing itreets and property lines - existing tructures access and utility easements - topograph c contours at intervals of not more than two (2) feet. 12. The applicant shall submit a list of all owners of property located within 300 feet of the exterior boundaries of the subject property. The list shall .be keyed to a map showing the location of these properties and shall include the name and address as shown on the latest available assessment role of the Riverside County Assessor's Office. 13. The applican66 shall submit a completed Environmental Assessment form, 14. The applican shall provide such additional information as the Director of Environmenta i Services may require to determine whether the granting of a Change of Zola would endanger the public health, safety, or general welfare. The application may be filed only by the owner of said property and shall be signed by the owner orb a person with a Power of Attorney, in writing (attached) from the owner authorizing the application or by the Attorney-at-Law for the owner. Indicate your authority be ow: I am the owner of said property. I am the agent for the owner of said property (attach written authorization). I have a Power of Attorney from the owner authorizing the application I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed at this day of 19 S 619 452 9209 D C NW i D A W N. . . . , , , EXACT LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (S Copies) The land re erred to in this policy is situated in the State of California,. County of Riverside, City of Palm Desert, and is described as follows: Lots 1 through 75 inclusive, and Lots A, B and C of Tract 4489-1 as shown by Map on file in Book 79 page 38 through 42, inclusive, of Maps, Records of Riverside County, California. Lots 1 through 175 inclusive, and Lots A, B and C of Tract 4489 as shown by; Map on file in Book 83 pages 34 through 40 inclusive, -f Maps, Records of Riverside County, California. i i I I Legal Descriptiop Approved by1 Date: I J I S 619 452 9209 DCHUz DRWN. EXACT LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (3 Copies) The land r4erred to in this policy is situated in the State of California,! County of Riverside, City of Palm Desert, and is described ap follows: Lots 1 through 75 inclusive, and Lots A, B and C of Tract 4489-1 as shown by Map on file in Book 79 page 38 through 42, inclusive, of Maps, Records of Riverside County, California. Lots 1 through 175 inclusive, and Lots A, B and C of Tract 4489 as shown by Map on file in Book 83 pages 34 through 40 inclusive, . f Maps, Records of Riverside County, California. i I i Legal Description Approved by: Date: I I PALM DESERT CA. 92260 rst�1�/S�tS�LfLS�S 1SO�sv �O2S1b19�S ***CHANGE OF ZONE— DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION Dawn/Goldey III Partnership Appiicont I Pq .. F...11 4320 La Jolla Village Drive, Suite 250 Mailing Address 619-457-1676 San Diego, California 92122 Teieonone City Stdfe — .. 2�0-Ceae REQUEST: (Describe specific nature of approval regVested) Rezone site fran PC(4) to PC (2) PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: See Attached ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 640-090 and 640-100 EXISTING ZONING . PC(4) Property Owner Author' Nan THE UN R IDN(0 STATES AT TNET ARE THE OwNERISI OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN AND HEREBY CITE AU ATIO PO 'We F"JNO Of Ttet APPLICATION, A DA _ ADRECVENT ASSOLVWO THE CITY,OF PAL DESERT CF ALL EIABILITICS RELATIVE TO ANY OEE0 RESTRICTIONe. 100 IBY MY SIONAT N THIS AGREEMENT, ABSOLVE THE CITY Of►ALAI DESERT Of ALL LIABILITIES REa AADIND ANY DEED RES TRICTIONS THAT MAY SE APPUCABLC TO THE FROPERTY DESCRIREO HEREIN. SIONATURC DATE Applicant's Signature - • BIONATUAR OAfE (POR raTTAAIF USE ONLY ENVIRONMENTAL aTATVa ACCUrED eY �L—Jy M AIINTCRIAL ACT C.A. No. lJ CATEGORICAL EALMPTION ���� No. 0 NCCATIVC OCCLARATION ❑ OTM[R _ , . RRFfRCHCC,uSr wn V e Caerna-Sand ing Group 1641 Langley Avenue Irvine, California 92714 714/261-6900 November 21 , 1985 Toni Wood The Dawn Company 4320 LaJolla Village Drive Suite 250 San Diego, CA 92122 RE: PALM DESERT Dear Toni : Please excuse our tardiness in responding to you request for a signature on the enclosed application form concering a change of zone in the City of Palm Desert. Since el , Richard D. Emery Vice President RDE:das Enclosure r PROOF OF PUBLICATION This space Is for the County Clerk's Filing Stamp (2015.5 C.C.P.) V41tld d0 AL\pN� "VG �a1p\r�R10 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, County of Riverside DESERT I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; 1 am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to Proof of Publication of or interested in the above-entitled matter. I CASE NO. PP 85-38 am the principal clerk of the printer of the •••••••••••••••••••••4.................................... DESERT POST . .................................................... .................CITY..OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE— CASE NO.PP 85.38 •......••••'""""""""""""""" I NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held before the a newspaper of general circulation, printed I!I Pelm Desert Planning commission to consider a request by DAWN/GOLDEY PARTNERSHIP for approval of a precise plan of design for 204,300 square feet of resort commercial along with a 250 room ho- B 1—Week 1 eel with 24 casite units on property zoned resort commercial(PC-4)for a and published ........... Y. 32 acre parcel at the southwest corner of Highway Ill end Fred Wer. Ing Drive. in the City Of .•R ill 79..P.0.$?.1.t ............. SAID public hearing Co will be held on Tuesday, December Civic Kent r. 2:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber at the Palm Desert CMc Center. County of Riverside, and which news- 73-510 Fred Waring Drive,Palm Desert,California.at which time and I place all interested persons are Invited to attend and be heard. if you 1 paper has been adjudged a newspaper challenge the proposed actions In court,you may be limited to raising of general circulation by the .Superior only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing de- scribed in this notice• or in written correspondence delivered to the Court of the County of Riverside, State of planning commission(of city councll)at.or prior MON A.DIAZSeprotery rp Palm Desert Planning Commission California, under the date of•lA/.5.., 19 b4.r (Pub.D.P.Dao.6,1985) Case Number .8,3658 ; that the notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpareil), has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any. supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: 12/6 ...........:........................................ CG all in the year 19..8•S. 1 rr I certify (or declare) under penalty of K O perjury that the foregoing Is true and C,� rT r n � correct. rn F— rn Dated at..,,,,•Pe mlm Desert C o _0 m 4' n 3 O California,this... th dayof•Dec: 1985 c; CO .. rn... .. .. ..... fV $I aiU Crl Free copies of this blank form maybe secured from CALIFORNIA NEWSPAPER SERVICE BUREAU, INC. Legal Advertising Clearing House 120 west Second St., Los Angeles, Calif. 90012 Telephone: (213) 625-2541 Pltass request OE NERAL Prool of Publication when ardainq this term. f _ 5F Mr . Henry Morris August 12, 1985 Page Two AUG 2 91985 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CITY, ,OF, PALM DESERT Royce segments. The initial consumer advertising campaign is shown in the center gatefold of the enclosed Franchise Brochure. This brochure also explains the Royce concept and the various services provided; I am enclosing a Royce Hotel Corporation Uniform Franchise Offer- ing Circular (UFOC) as well as a California State Disclosure, Please have the principal of the project acknowledge the last page of each document and return them to Susan Robie at Royce Hotels Interntional, Inc: His signature does not commit him to anything, it merely acknowledges receipt of the UFOC, as required by federal law. After you have been in receipt of these docu- ments for ten days, we will then be able to begin discussions for a license. I look forward to speaking further with you about your exciting project. In the meantime, if there is anything further I can do for you, please feel free to give me a call. cerely, Stephen L. Selka Encls : Royce Hotel Corporation UFOC California State Disclosure Royce Promotional Package t i ROYCE HOTELS INTERNATIONAL; INC. 16CI Bekadere Road•Swaim Cemrc South•`.Vest Palm Bench,Ronda 334C6•(304)6,S6-}S8S Stephen L. Selka Chief Executive Officer _ RESORTS HOTELS INNS August 12 , 1985 Mr . Henry Morris STUDIO C DESIGN 6635 North Mountainview Drive Scottsdale, AZ 85253 Dear Mr . Morris : I have reviewed your telephone conversation of Friday with Susan Robie. The project in Palm Dessert, California you discussed sounds like it would make an excellent addition to the growing . Royce family. As a little background on Royce... Royce Hotel Corporation is a wholly owned subsidiary of Servico, Inc. Servico owns and operates approximately fifty hotels and is considered to be one of the leading hotel operating companies in the world. Servico began development of the Royce concept over five years ago. The introduction of Royce followed a period of extensive consumer research. Royce recognized that consumer tastes and preferences were changing. A trend towards larger rooms, better restaurants and the desire for more exciting lounge. concepts was developing. Royce was positioned to meet this emerging trend. Royce is a multi-tiered company of resorts, hotels and inns offering luxury rooms and suites, innovative restaurant concepts and high energy entertainment lounges. Royce properties are unique and offer competitive advantages within a given market. . The Royce positioning theme is, "Very, Very Royce." This theme works very, very well in each of our ads and supports each of the Continued , . please. . . i i ROYCE HOTELS INTERNAT'IONALil INC. 1601 Belvedere Road•S.mco Centre South•Nest Palm Beach,Florida 33-kb•(305)6S6-48S8, THE HOTEL �.ARTHURS . WrrH No Rooms t r . . j, I Arthurs, an elegant 131-seat, continental-style (7hey're All Suites!) t restaurant and cocktail lounge, overlooks the colorful pod and reception area, with a breath- taking backdrop of mountains beyond. Each of Royce's 162 suites includes a sitting room, dining area, full kitchen — ' and a balcony or patio, in addition to a large private bedroom and bath. — i II •®5' a r z� Renowned "Designer Of The Year" Larry Seitz, has blended furniture, fabrics and color to t + create a rich, sophisticated atmosphere des- MOUNTAIN MAJESTY I y`_ tined to set a new standard for desert opulence., ' Banquet facilities available. r The Royce definition of total indulgence: Basking your body in warm, dry } --- GOLF AT YOUR DOORsm sunshine while cooling your — 4 r eyes on a view of glistening 1 L'Nms, TOO! snowcapped mountains. ., A. Av I I j � =-: �The purple mountain maj- - SWIM, SPA SUN Your suite is just steps from a championship [PGA rated esty of California's ram- 71.0]golf course.An excellent pro shop with two teaching' bling Santa Rosa moun- The giant, uniquely shaped pool and bubbling hot I pros round out the golfing program at Royce Resort. tains adds a touch of magic r spa are easily accessible from every suite. Pool- For tennis lovers, there are ten courts [7 lightedj, a pro to everything at Royce side snack, beverage and towel service, along shop and tennis lessons. An additional, informal restau Resort Hotel of Palm f, with complimentary use of board games, add to rant, located directly on the golf course, offers hearty Springs. . the luxury: breakfasts and lunches for sports lovers and loafers alike. ROYCE RESOR�r HOTEL MEETING r+Aciuu ES ¢ C A L 1 F O R N- 1 A —. r"oalr 3.316 w11w<fW wsm YERIXE 1 MfEi1M0 :. •-�1 Y �RR YESM A. Airport transport available - A spacious 3,316 square feet have been — - - devoted to very private, beautifully ap- pointed meeting and banquet facilities. A full-time representative is available to help ■ you plan your meetings, right down to the last bubble in your toast-to-success! RYE RESORT HOTEL 34567 Cathedral Canyon Orive, Palm Sprirgs, CA 92264 «►_ ..:: ,�/ty \ —,` (619) 321-9000 RESERVATIONS SEE YOUR PROFESSIONAL TRAVEL AGENT OR i--- CALL TOLL FREE IN CALIFORNIA: (1) 800-223-2149 Ali r � Your professional travel agent is . . . AWAY FROM IT ALL . ... j IN THE HEART OF THE DESERT ,�—•»„^.,- _ _- �` -= 1 PHOTOS BYJ65N POITRAS I' - � - -T I NOIOR VIEW PRESS 1 WMORNEG W250 15 �' ,T Y .. - J i I r � ;, ✓ u � U r ,n q� � i � yl 11 �,�fl , �m a+�^ny ✓vJ� 1) Y a1 ��� � fIf( �,Iul � f 1�`I'll�„V� IT A 'Kll oy� `' ovti S„ !i 4°r li•' „YI\'\��'� -, �/�\S .{J'N� °�' [ f� W7 G0� � y1 n4 G! �� 'h4✓� �Ij�f GARY •I„,m,� n �" {'" J� w!` . . � :�A� d�' ;��w � f n ;, � �"`l iA I � rl��, �I r ����pppp77 ARCHI NELSON ASSOCIATES AFiGHiTE - PALM DESERT RESORT CENTER �.. GTS INGOgPCIq ATE❑ , PCMTECNPE OEYGN P� NING P.meNlx Eos xNCEEes mcm PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA - - - »m yy`.: � �" .. '� ". 1 ".. .-.- - - _ _. � -�. � "'' 'i.Z.'r`+--y�<� c✓'-�.}f�1�s��tm3"���^'--�F-��i=rlc.'+�'.^Z,;�-le. l' "ri-,f � VIEtYoIGE-2�imRf - r / CdIR151DE•�J�mRY VIFiJra OE -34fc'R1' J - `1 � � 2y�ttY I I I ®. II I I 4 � ' 9 1 I � _TEW2Q-'E. �/•� _ -BRIaEer __�G•�-(�Q� I - ftNN tOLLh � _.-.911EE7i< `J _ _Lf fY_FC-CIvE i a, " FLm2 6�U.0. ,. e.a. -W. ru�o tm l-c >ar j fly I �1 - z tt d i Y¢ DUItUlu6'`' r �\._ CCCk.Td1Lt � (LVZT51 QDc �J'rR•f �� :' u� 7 '�`� owwv _ t •'s \\ 91.nNo •f i��� ,. .I Flfill2c �1u6 ,•��R c�..� Z l; '.�• �` i`� 11-¢s ¢I Imo oll � �'• of /wv� EY�T(VIEkyIGE)''/Jv .� •.:. �' ��.. v�r7 �{(�tT�'�--.-.••� ., �h ' y GARY W C9i -2r7Ia2; �`] / �_ � .m•fS F- � � /K .y"°� �'. duck&e¢rcP i i `, - GM('LTriiP ' - YWZ14llrJ �9 �P _ i_� ARGHIARCH NELSON ASSOCIATES i-LO®R PLd,W C®HtlRERF..NCE CENTER Bc 14o EL WINGS? TEGTS IcNCOgPGRATEO; GR®IJPID recrUPE IPNNiN _ PHOENIX l05 L ELES `�C4LE yDi' I. - ... 14- _ .a a 'sue 4 < t . f 0l1tIMiNG 40 les , '=r at PARKING LOT ISLANDS COMMERCIAL CENTER 4 WALK IN AND MEDIANS LANDSCAPED LANDSCAPE AM _ PARKING LOT SURFACE--ASPHALT CONCRETE FRED WARNG DRIVE MERVYN'S 60,000 S. F. GENERAL RETAIL 172,370 S. F. _, .. TOTAL 232,370 S.F. �-1 ,c_ ` _ • . PARKING REQUIRED 1046 " PARKING PROVIDED 1057 p'' k 4' WALL v PARKING CIRCULATION 62% 600,540 S. F. MERVYN S 60,000 S.F. "' LANDSCAPE & OPEN AREA 10% 141,092 S.F. � y-- H�J1ttY LAND�APE AAA WM HACK ,j LANDSCAPEp HOTEL SITE Z � 1RPEI WATER FEATURE HOTEL 168,640 S. F. COUNTRY CLUB REST. 7,040 S. F. ENTRY ._ i. : _ - -- CLUB HOUSE 6,640 S. F. - rrr MAINTENANCE 4,000 S. F. PAD RIGHT OUT , _ A CASITAS 49,920 S. F. 29,300 S.F. TOTAL 236,240 S. F. '., PARKING REQUIRED 434 PARKING PROVIDED 434 WALL-- � w .a • PARKING & CIRCULATION 32% 138,224 S.F. A o %• f='` 27 800 S.F. —HnVY LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPE & OPEN AREA 40% 174,762 S. F. - ' a '.i AREA WITH WALK , a Y ' 4' WALL ,w LANDSC"M way SITE INFORMATION r �► AREA I _ ,,. ." V t _ h ♦ �J, r fir, � t BUILDING COVE ) .r - RAGE (25� 356,290 S F LANDSCAPE & OPEN AREA (22%) 315,854S.F. cvq. 3 SF 01 \ �' ON 53% 738 766 S.F. � , �� PARKING AND CIRCULATION ( ) , } PARCEL, SIZE 32.39 ACRES 1,410,910 S. F. > Y ZONING P.C.( cp - a' rl , Al 1 BOA® ' �, ' oil r ENTRYMAMMANC-✓ ` fi ' ,,� � , - —,--—-- ----✓✓ - E LAUNDRY & bg COMMMARY ot BUILDING , TV41ACE � s POOL ac n ' 9 t 4 7 1F ! CASITAS .. • ." - +]-=ar = • / {/��/��* I} ��\per . alI"1\/A4 G`41iVi11 - �E�ar, 2 RAMP TO ' .µ , » ,, � vRPLExEs PARKING 6 ADS QU js —24 UNITS -: TYPAL PORTS COCHERE PATIO - , r r ' r- IMAYY LANDSCAPED MOTORCOURT EwrRY f Y z s s� W/ l Aft FOUNtAIIAS `f � 1' TIUM SIGNAGE ECT. a Prod raft PARKING p�p}� CARDED & r STALL Ez,�RGr TYPICAL EN ONLY ro ` epee" NORTH VMffY MAP 0 50 100 200 , < r , k' „ ,. , F ., ,..::: _, r.. ,: .... - Mo ". ":. .. - .: „ . rid -osso k,. frank kirk' D e & '.::, >.... a ,, , .... ram.. •.a,. ,. ,...:: ,. x - , V M .N > ow , b"0 am :c _ 'M x .. -.-,. ..r`4 #� ., .-.., , e :i..e, .-a.. -,. Sy N �. '.•.. .. �-:' x.. , ....., ,,b ':,...... h -..A.. .. f. w.. :.-.t.'4 rc •p .,:. 1.a.i . ,.a, c ,....-.- 3 '�...>+� -,.:...#.i_ .,. .. .: - . «<x :... -.' «->•.. ...._ .'L°18 ,..»s... _ R»ay'tl.•"£.:..-.., ,.. ...X`.,.z M•--.-..._,. - -. . __ r. '.,<. _ tr.,r. z..<,...._ �, F..,a.-?',G....•. .u-.-s.__.,.. 4, 1Z 0 TO, NOT" f AM PARIdNG LOT RMANDS 49 WMX W AND ,MEDIANS UMSCAPED COMMERCIAL CENTER FM WMNG DRIW PARMG WT SURFACE-ASPHALT CONCRETE 60,000 S.F. MERVYN'S GENERAL RETAIL 172,370 S. F. Iz TOTAL w" 232,370 S. F. Al PARKING REQUIRED 1046 PARKING PROVIDED 1057 MERWN'S PARKING CIRCULATION 62% 600,540 S.F. 60,000 S.F. HEAVY LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPE & OPEN AREA 10% 141,092 S.F. AM vm WAIX WDSCAPS MAU WM WATIR P%AT%W HOTEL SITE W -1 .9t i po CQ cr) HOTEL 168,640 S. F. lomy COUNTRY CLUB REST. 7,040 S. F. 'Tr: _7 6,640 -9. F. __J MAINTENANCE 4,000 S. F. WHT OUT PAD A 4 29,300 S.F. CASITAS 49,920 S.F. —4, TOTAL 236,240 S. F. PARKING REQUIRED 434 WAM PARKING PROVIDED 434 cx � i *. 4_1 PARKING & CIRCULATION 32% 138,224 S. F. PAD B 27,800 S.F. HEAVY LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPE & OPEN AREA 40% 174,762 S. F. an WITH WALK LANDSCAPE 4' WALL AREA SITE INFORMATION 1A, LANDSCAPE & OPEN AREA (22%) 315,854 S.F. BUILDING COVERAGE (25%) 356,290 S.F. lv� PARKING AND CIRCULATION (53%) 738,766 S. F. PARCEL SIZE 32.39 ACRES 1,410,910 S.F. ZONING P. C. (4) bo 0 BRA MAINTENANCE LAUNDRY COMMISSARY BUIMING 6. POOL CASMAS —STORY TYPWAL 2 RAMP TID 2 BNOROOK 2 PARK= BATH IFOURPIMES —24 UNITS 6 QUADS Polm COCHM TYPICAL ci PA170 ,1A, MA HEAVY LANDSCAPED MOTORCOUNT ENTRY WIVEAGS. YOUNTADIS THEbM SIGNAGE XCT. P PARKING 0 fftd Elft ..,j CARDED & STALL namawy VEHICLE Ony TYPICAL 0 Po" NORTH VICINMY MAP 0 50 100 200 d 00 0, �PR C0111MINift 0 low fun-K 5111 ft� _ 894 jM ek" Of 5. -W AM;- -To �Z A j k , � � f e a _r 7 Jv job 10 a tz AZ Ir Ly Z 17 Y O 17f < W �- ,� � Z Z a Q O 1 J i i W Q J iu ' W w a I � U i co CL W w `I w Q i v { ' -- Lu � C� Z r Q w o w i w w z � �, mow ' • `ri } � f a � O � � c� a. r. I I i '... t. 3• S � '�_. .#'� �, :sr;"..�,tx :'{5. ESQ_ +2 - . 44 y ., _ ., • :.-.r. 'i ,:. � .: �.�. ,�. ..>._ CL cy ram.�., .. xs. ..,.a T ' W 0 k• _ �� � � � p� •� Tom• O } m � W U } PLAN BUILDING� TYPE 8 P AN BUILDING TYPE C - Q r PLAN BUILDING TYPE A A L o m N III Q N D. Va o 9 ------ _ ---- � � rflu08 �- , i ml�l F1 r1i IL 1 ELEVATlt3N BUILDING TYPE A ELEVATION BUILDING TYPE B ELEVATION BUILDING TYPE C tie -, i c CID 41 ,. w� 1 td •(n 14 s : Tv IL AL HIM \�,*Afmilz� s - r y i " � .". - ,i ` __--'_. i - „ " � .:.,. ...- _. , .,... _.-:....<..,..._.. ,-._..... - - --.,-•.ram-'--^--�'a-^-- _ � � � x z •+ w / '- + Lu i Z TYPICAL ELEVATION a W 16 , ,4 ` x Q 4 BRUNING 40 105 SITE INFORMATION NOTES 4' RALK IN ALL PARKING LOT ISLANDS PARCEL SIZE 1,410,910 S.F. LANDSCAPE AREA AND MEDIANS LANDSCAPED BUILDING COVERAGE 328,220 S.F. FRED WARING DRIVE PARKING LOT SURFACE-ASPHALT CONCRETE PARKING & CIRCULATION 593,224 S. F. LANDSCAPE & OPEN AREA 430,966 S. F. PADS d i p. 1`I° HEAVY LANDSCAPE COMMERCIAL SITE AREA WITH WALK PARCEL SIZE BUILDING COVERAGE 204,300 S.F. 915,504 S.F BUILDING-A 68,650 S.F. I BUILDING-B 33,075 S. F. BUILDING -C 10 2,575 S.F. /- PARKING & CIRCULATION 455,000 S.F. r- 1,422 REQ.) -;• / \ RIGHT IN miff OU , 1,300 PROVIDED) vo PAD_A LANDSCAPE & OPEN AREA 256,204 S. F. o 29,250 S.F. W e "- '" /- HOTEL SITE MALL , ty =` 29,250 S.F.. �►� � V_✓A I _ - ` BUILDING COVERAGE 123,920 S.F. ,go /-'/ Ate► .►n�I .AIx HOTEL (MULTI. STORY) 168,640 S.F. 81,280 S.F. LANDSCAPE / `Q o \, 4' WAU COUNTRY CLUB REST. 7,040 S.F. AREA ._. MAINTENANCE 4,000 S.F. CASITAS 49,920 S.F. 24,960 S. F. PARKING & CIRCULATION (434 PROV) 138,224 S.F. ro 1,� � y LANDSCAPE & OPEN AREA 174,672 S.F. "so o � � ff PADS f PAD-A 29,250 S. F. 58,500 S. F. toa��r G o��s� �'S` 6' PAD-B 29,250 S. F. Nbl G 6AL �PCJIIII S. rr �� �,G 000 oil 6 , S. 9� MAINTENANCE •• LAUNDRY do \ IOU ` COMMISSARY BUILDING \ �A POOL do • ?jj,, M � e• TERRACE Cb `` � � � �� �' �,O $ e• CASTfAs Q +'N Q TYPICAL PARTING STORY RAMP TO `cam GQ o� / BATH FOURPLEXES Q 8 QUADS-2a UNITS 2s" FORTE coclERE ,,�C TYPICAL PATIO C s s G WAVY LANDBCAPIW 4. MOTORCOURT ENTRY W/FLAGS, FOUNTAINS THEME SIGNAGE ECT. G , � � 4 PARKING CARDED & ' STALL EMERGENCY TYPICAL VEHICLE ONLY ENTRANCES , P.rk Fred Waring 7 y NORTH EI paboo 0 50 100 200 2 VICINITY MAP SHEET NO. k. frank kirkbride & associates DAWN/GOLDEY PARTNERSHIP PROPOSED COMMERCIAL JOB NO. DATE landscape architects 4320 La Jolla Village Drive CE"NTER and HOTEL 315 6th Ave. S.E. Suite C San Diego, California 92122 SITE PLAN DESIGNED SCALE 4 as.l.a. looe�,, wash►ngton 96503 (206)491 6900 (619) 4 6 7- 16 7 6 PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA DRAWN ADEVELOPMENT Of DAWN/GOLDEY Ill PARTNERSHIP CHECKED c i � A f _ _ R = c 3 u w! 0 < _ s� •t W a �', Ia Q i I s co v) a. 1 . w JI u ujl 4 i C' '0 C to loc � _ h. W w ! ~ `z L7 x¢ ![ i w Q < J Qy �' „_ LL `w •u : •f r �.__-._.__,,—,Sri..+_..,-_ .._........ ..—._...._-..,........ —.—w 1� Lu �� E ^♦ i W � � ! I 1 ? V' Job W i W W z : (1) i W t 1 4 o x� L cc Q CL Au ram o '0 Y 4 Jt!9R CL I ,�'r�, ,a., .. :•«.-c�:Fa. ,-�-r;�. e:.x,.�t�z. -;� 1, s:-::� a -�:,�+E '�r+a .,�. ,�.._ "� -n > N _ CL rh •- r- _Q ! i cm CCo, w Z � t 01 ti PLAN BUILDING TYPE A PLAN BUILDING TYPE B PLAN BUILDING TYPE C -i o 0 z o a CO 1 IN IT � k I IL� 4 10 C6 ELEVATION BUILDING TYPE A ELEVATION BUILDING TYPE B ELEVATION BUILDING TYPE C fr �, co to 10 id 0 _ 10 a TYPICAL ELEVATION z r I M11 I I 1-�. 1E � �2 1 1 ul IL r I r . u ° Z i1 m as < ui {{ { VJ''^^ d 10 1 � i � � IQ r-• 1 J i 1 , QLUw H W LU cc c i cl i i w j W w sf !1 z ■ w Q Q } iCL o t w lo cc tu n �m 'z Lu Lu a O W LLJ Z Li c W i a �C j � ctS I Q w cc CL "W x r �- U :..t#.'. . _._., , . Usk'-- cc b 'i cy } W � Z O qD i A 1� s cG c CD- o W = L) PLAN BUILDING TYPE A PLAN BUILDING TYPE B PLAN BUILDING TYPE C ° 0 o 0 w �. z _ 0 ca µ d co : U. .0 � ° ELEVATION BUILDING TYPE A ELEVATION BUILDING TYPE B ELEVATION BUILDING TYPE C all4� •� �4 TP Y _ - - j I - c i jl! tNNE a • S c 3 --__-_ 1 r o_ 0 a O z TYPICAL ELEVATION ETI Ica W Mi O �ti SRUNING 40 105 SITE INFORMATION NOTES ALL PARKING LOT ISLANDS PARCEL SIZE 1,410,910 S. F. 4' WALK FAiIN AM PARKING MEDIANS LANDSCAPED PARKING LOT SURFACE—ASPHALT CONCRETE BUILDING COVERAGE 328,220 S.F. FRED WARING DRIVE PARKING & CIRCULATION 593,224 S.F. a LANDSCAPE & OPEN AREA 430,966 S.F. - - PADS �c a � G 4' WALL COMMERCIAL SITE HEAVY LANDSCAPE ,� , +�• �� AREA WM WALK PARCEL SIZE BUILDING COVERAGE 204,300 S. F. 915,504 S.F BUILDING—A 68,650 S. F. BUILDING—B 33,075 S. F.- BUILDING —C 102,575 S. F. PARKING & CIRCULATION 455,000 S. F. 1,022 REQ.) „ cj k, /' " \ �1,300 PROVIDED) Miff OUT v PAD-A LANDSCAPE & OPEN AREA 256,204 S.F. o \` 29,250 S.F ' HOTEL SITE WALL - _ ti 4-3�t�E 6,� S.F. . FACE 06 z9,250 S.F. - r al; /- , m BUILDING COVERAGE 123,920 S.F. ARZAHOTEL (MULTI. STORY) 168,640 S.F. 81,280 S.F. 4' WALL COUNTRY CLUB REST. 7,040 S. F. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE 4, 000 S. F. AREA CASITAS 49,920 S.F. 24,960 S. F. PARKING & CIRCULATION (434 PROV) 138,224 S.F. LANDSCAPE & OPEN AREA 174,672 S.F. PAD I "u oo 5 - \ PAD—A 29,250 S.F. 58,500 S. F. Vo ''Go ° p°'S� °' � 60 PAD— B 29,250 S.F. 0")�r�;� �'s�. Qoo �o°o �� X ro o ITO - am Q MAINTENANCE ., LAUNDRY do \ C0MUMARY BUILDING POOL & TERRACE cb 4 . CASITAS TYPICAL 2-STORY �� Q ,��� 4 .` 2 H®ROOIL 2 RAMP TO ' 'SS'04'1 BATH FOURPLKW PARKING 6 QUADS-24 UNITS MIA PORTE COCHERE �„° TYPICAL A cle // PATIO 15 r0 ,� HEAVY LANDSCAPED -� ENTRY WOj�RCOFOUNTAINS THEVE SIGNAGE ECT. S G , co � r.. �9, ' PARKING CARDED & STALL EUMENCY \ �- TYPICAL VEHICLE ONLY ENTRANCES ' Park vy�_ Fr*d Waring � 1 NORTH , EJ Pasco 0 50 100 200 VICINITY MAP t SHEET No. k. frank kirkbride & associates DAWN/GOLDEY PARTNERSHIP PROPOSED COMMERCIAL JOB NO. DATE londscape architects 4320 La Jolla Village Drive CENTER and HOTEL DESIGNED 4315 dth A**. .; 3-E. Suite C 03.1.0. San Diego, California 92122 SITE PLAN SCALE ft k3cW,wavton c >491-69M (619) 467-16�6 PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA . DRAWN or DEVELOPMENT of DAWj=LDEY III PARTNERSHIP CHECKED