Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPP 86-09 APARTMENTS/SAN PABLO AVENUE 1986 i 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 June 23, 1987 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION ACTION CASE NO: PP 86-9 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) : DAVE MANOOKIAN. P. 0. Box 2060. Sun Valley, ID 83353. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of revisions to approved landscape plan. LOCATION: Southeast corner of San Pablo and Santa Rosa. ZONE- R-3 S.O. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Upon reviewinq the submitted plans and presentations by staff and by the applicant, the Architectural Commission aranted approval subject to inked changes made on city copy of plans. Date of Action: June 23. 1987 Vote: 4-0 (An appeal of the above action may be made in writinq to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen ( 15) days of the date of the decision. ) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- STAFF COMMENTS: Please read the attached minutes. MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL MEETING JUNE 23, 1987 `a �Y' 2. CASE N0: PP 86-9 6 j0 r— APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) : DAVE MANOOKIAN, P. 0. Box 2060, Sun Valley, ID 83353. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: : Approval of revisions to approved landscape plan. drawings for senior housing project. LOCATION: Southeast corner of San Pablo and Santa Rosa. ZONE: R-3 5.0. .It was moved by Commissioner Cook, seconded by Commissioner McCrea, to grant approval subject to changes marked in ink on the city copy of plans. Copy to be returned to appplicant. Carried 4-0. 3. CASE NO: PP 87-15 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) : CHAZEN CONSTRUCTION, 72-624 El Paseo, Palm Desert. CA 92260. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Final approval of working drawings and landscape plan for seven unit apartment complex. LOCATION: Portola at San Jacinto - south of De Anza Way. ZONE: R-1 (Request for R-2 5.000) It was moved by Commissioner Drury, seconded by Commissioner Cook, to approve the architectural plans subject to a final landscape plan being resubmitted for approval . Carried 4-0. Architectural plans may be submitted to Building Department for plan's check. Building permits may not be issued prior to final approval of landscaping. Landscaping needs more action along the wall , trees increased in size and more plantings, before working drawings are approved. 4. CASE NO: SF 879 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) : ROBERT JOHN KRAUSE, 44-374 Portola, Palm Desert, CA 92260. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of a fence along front property line. LOCATION: 44-574 Portola. one lot north of De Anza Wav6. 3 R I 1 I- = 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 June 9, 1987 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION ACTION CASE NO: PP 86-9 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) : DAVE MANOOKIAN, P. 0. Box 2060, SUN VALLEY, ID 83353 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of revisions to approved landscape plan. LOCATION: Southeast corner of San Pablo and Santa Rosa. ZONE: R-3 S.O. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Upon reviewing the submitted plans and presentations by staff and by the applicant, the Architectural Commission denied the request and suggested resubmission. Date of Action: June 9, 1987 Vote: 5-0 (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen ( 15) days of the date of the decision. ) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ STAFF COMMENTS: Please read the attached minutes. 7 AGENDA ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION JUNE 9, 1987 R vS�oN To LOCATION: North side Fred Waring Drive west of Monterey Avenue between Acacia and Adonis Drive. ZONE: R-2 (proposed change of zone to O.P. ) 7. CASE NO: PP 87-23 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) : DELTA DEVELOPMENT, 18002 Skypark Circle, Irvine, CA 92714 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of a 46, 144 square foot office/industrial complex (single story) . LOCATION: Southeast corner of Cook Street and Hovley Lane. ZONE: S. I . I . Addition of patterned/colored concrete. 2 Substitution of full size heavenly bamboo (Nandina) for Nandina Compacta (dwarf size) which is presently proposed. 8. MISCELLANEOUS: Dave Jenkins - Request for 16 foot single family home building height at 72-651 Homestead Road and 72-711 Homestead Road. III . CASES: A. Final Drawings: 1. CASE NO: PP 86-9 ..APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) : DAVE MANOOKIAN, P. 0. Box 2060, Sun Valley, ID 83353 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of revisions to approved landscape plan. LOCATION: Southeast corner of San Pablo and Santa Rosa. ZONE: R-3 S.O. It was motioned by Commissioner Holden, seconded by Chairman Gregory, to deny approval and to request resubmission. Carried 5-0 3 NOTICE OF DETERMINATION Negative Declaration TO.: (X) Clerk of the Board of Supervisors ( ) Secretary for Resources County of Riverside 1416 Ninth St. , Rm 1311 4080 Lemon Street Sacramento, CA 95814 Riverside, CA 92502 FROM: CITY OF PALM DESERT 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 SUBJECT: Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108 or . .21152 of the Public Resources Code. Project Title/Common Name: Manookian 24 unit apartment-project, PP 86-9 Date of Project Approval : April 1, 1986 State Clearinghouse Number (if submitted) : N/A Contact Person: Steve Smith, Associate Planner Prolect Location: Southeast corner of San Pablo and Santa Rosa Way. Project Description: 24 apartment units. This is to advise that the City of Palm Desert has made the following determinations regarding the above described project: 1. The project ( ) will , (X) will not, have a significant effect on the environment. 2. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared in connection with this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. X A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. A copy of the Negative Declaration may be examined at the above city hall address. 3. Mitigation measures (X) were, ( ) were not, ,made a condition of the approval of the project. 4. A statement of Overriding Considerations ( ) was, (X) was not, adopted for this pro bct. �) BOARO OF SUPS ''" Signa Title 1S FHB 10A7 Date Received for Filing Please return date-stamped copy in the enclosed envelope. � w aa. . , :Ila MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION APRIL 1, 1986 Action: Moved by Commissioner Downs, seconded by Commissioner Wood, adopting the findings as presented by staff. Carried 4-1 (Richards voted no. ) Moved by Commissioner Downs, seconded by Commissioner Wood, adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 1129, recommending approval of DA 84-8A to city council . Carried 4-1 (Richards voted no. ) A FIVE MINUTES RECESS WAS CALLED AT 9: 13 P.M. C. Case No.. P_ P 86 9 - DAVE MANOOKIAN, Applicant Request for approval of a precise plan of design to allow 24 residential units and a negative declaration of environmental impact as it relates thereto, for a 60 ,570 square foot property in the R-3 zone, located at the southeast corner of San Pablo and Santa Rosa. Mr. Diaz outlined the salient points of the staff report and recommended approval . i Chairman Crites opened the public testimony and asked the applicant to address the commission. MR. BERNARD LEUNG, architect, indicated that this was the first project for the north side area. He noted that it was within the setback requirements and outlined some of the amenities. Chairman Crites asked if anyone present wished to speak in FAVOR or OPPOSITION to the proposed. MR. TOM BRANICK, 44-160 San Pablo, felt It was a very good project. He indicated that he had asked for a six foot wall and equipment moved from the property line and noted that this had been done. Chairman Crites closed the public testimony. Action: Moved by Commissioner Downs, seconded by Commissioner Wood, adopting the findings as presented by staff. Carried 5-0. Moved by Commissioner Downs, seconded by Commissioner Wood, adopting 7 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION APRIL 1, 1986 Planning Commission Resolution No. I130, approving PP 86-9, subject to conditions. Carried 5-0. D. Case No. PP 86-10 - DAVE MANOOKIAN, Applicant Request for approval of a precise plan of design to allow 16 residential units and a negative declaration of environmental impact as it relates thereto, for a 40, 758 square foot property in the R-3 zone, located on the west side of San Rafael , 100 feet south of Catalina Way. Mr. Diaz outlined the salient points of the staff report and recommended approval . Chairman Crites opened the public testimony and asked the applicant to address the commission. I MR. BERNARD LEUNG, architect, reviewed the amenities of the project. He indicated that a wall had been built by the neighbor to the south. He stated that he would like to replace the 4' wall to the south with a 6' wall and eliminate any i vacant land between the properties. Chairman Crites asked if anyone present wished to speak in FAVOR or OPPOSITION to the proposed. MS. VERONA STUART, 44-476 San Rafael , asked for clarification regarding setbacks, height, sewer connections, and rental of the property. Mr. Leung clarified these points. MR. DAN HOVER, 44-505 San Carlos, expressed concern for traffic j impacts on Catalina and suggested stop signs for San Rafael and San Carlos. Mr. Diaz informed Mr. Hoyer that the issue of stop signs being warranted would have to be taken to the traffic committee and recommended that he contact the public works department. ' I Chairman Crites closed the public testimony. Chairman Crites felt that 16 residential units would not create an enormous traffic impact and also suggested that Mr. Hoyer talk with the technical traffic committee via the public works department. 8 I � I I 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NOTICE OF ACTION Date: April 3, 1986 DAVE MANOOKIAN BERNARD LEUNG P.O. BOX 2060 73-550 Alessandro Drive Sun Valley, ID 83353 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Re: PP 86-9 The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of April 1 , 1986. APPROVED BY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1130. CARRIED 5-0. Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Community Development, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen ( 15) days of the date of the decision. I f:w' RAMON A. DIAZ, SECR VCMISSION PALM DESERT PLANNING RAD/tm PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1130 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PRECISE PLAN OF DESIGN AND A NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A 24 UNIT APARTMENT PROJECT AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAN PABLO AND SANTA ROSA. CASE NO. PP 86-9 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 1st day of April , 1986 hold a duly notice public hearing to consider the request by DAVE MANOOKIAN for approval of a precise plan of design and negative declaration of environmental impact to allow construction of a 24 unit apartment complex on a 60,570 square foot site at the southeast corner of San Pablo and Santa Rosa. WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedures to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 80-89" in that the director of community development has determined that the project will not have an adverse impact on the environment and a negative declaration has been prepared. WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said commission did find the following facts and reasons to exist to justify the granting of said precise plan of design. 1 . The design of the precise plan will not substantially depreciate J property values in the vicinity. 2. The precise plan will not unreasonably interfere with the use or enjoyment of the property in the vicinity by the occupants thereof for lawful purposes. 3. The precise plan will not endanger the public peace, health, safety or general welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert. California, as follows: 1 . That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the commission, in this case." 2. That approval of Precise Plan 86-9 is hereby granted for reasons subject to the attached conditions. 3. That a negative declaration of environmental impact is hereby certified. 1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1130 PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this lst day of April , 1986 by the following vote to wit: AYES: DOWNS, ERWOOD, RICHARDS, WOOD 8 CRITES NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE BUEORD CRITES, Chairman ATTEST: RAMON A. DIAZ, Secret' /dl 9 2 v PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1130 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO. PP 86-9 Department of Community Development: 1 . The development of the property shall conform substantially with exhibits on file with the department of community development, as modified by the following conditions. 2. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for construction of any uses contemplated by this approval , the applicant shall first complete all the procedural requirements of the city which include, but are not limited to, architectural commission, subdivision process and building permit procedures. 3. Construction of a portion of said project shall commence within one year from the date of final approval unless a time extension is granted, other- wise said approval shall become null , void and of no effect whatsoever. 4. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein which are in addition to all municipal ordinances and state and federal statutes now in force, or which hereafter may be in force. 5. Prior to issuance of. a building permit for construction of any use contem- plated by this approval , the applicant shall first obtain permits and/or clearance from the following agencies: Coachella Valley Water District Palm Desert Architectural Commission City Fire Marshal Riverside County Department of Health Palm Desert Water & Services District Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to the department of building and safety at the time of issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. 6. Location and design of trash enclosures shall be coordinated with Palm Desert Disposal Company. 7. Project to be provided with a minimum six foot high solid masonry wall along perimeter property lines (except for approve openings) or other walls or features as may be acceptable to architectural commission. 3 ' 1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1130 8. That the owner (developer) prior to issuance of building permit, provide evidence to the city that he has paid school mitigation fee ($628/unit) to the Desert Sands Unified School District. Department of Public Works- I. Drainage and signalization fund fees, as required by city ordinance, shall be paid prior to grading permit issuance. 2. Storm drain construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study by the Private engineer that is approved by the department of public works. 3. Full public improvements, including traffic safety lighting, as required by ordinance and the director of public works, shall be installed in accordance with city standards. 4. Improvement plans for water and sewer systems shall be approved by the respective service districts with "as-built" plans submitted to the department of public works prior to the project final . 5. Complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required by ordinance to the city engineer for checking and approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. The engineer shall submit "as-built" plans prior to acceptance of the improvements by the city. 6. All private driveways and parking lots shall be inspected by the engineering department and a standard inspection fee shall be paid prior to grading permit issuance. 7. Landscaping maintenance on San Pablo and Santa Rosa shall be provided by the property owner. 8. Existing utilities running through the center of the project and on Santa Rosa Way shall be undergrounded per each respective utility district's recommendation. 9. Complete grading plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the city engineer for checking and approval prior to issuance of any permits. 10. Dedication of five feet of right-of-way on San Pablo Avenue and Santa Rosa Way shall be done prior to issuance of any permits and approval of plans. 11 . Installation of curb and gutter, matching paving and sidewalk on Santa Rosa Way and sidewalk on San Pablo Avenue. 4 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1130 12. Offsite improvement plans to be approved by public works department and a surety posted to guarantee the required offsite improvements prior to grading permit issuance. 13. Installation of sewers to serve this project. 14. Size, number and location of driveways to public works specifications with only one driveway approach to be allowed to serve this property. 15. Any permit issuance shall be subject to the waiver of parcel map first being approved and recorded. City Fire Marshal : 1 . Install a water system capable of delivering 2500 GPM fire flow from any fire hydrant for a 2 hour duration in addition to domestic supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement. 2. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants so that no point of any building is more than 250 feet from a fire hydrant measured along approved vehicular travel ways. a. exterior surface of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow, and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. b, curbs shall be painted red 15 in either direction from each hydrant, C. hydrants shall not be located closer than 25 feet to any building. 3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and three copies of the water system plan to the fire marshal for review. Upon approval , one copy will be sent to the building department and the original will be returned to the developer. 4. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and approved by the water company with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system in PP 86-9 is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the fire marshal". 5. Prior to delivery of combustible materials to the building site, the required water system shall be installed, operating and delivering the required flow. 6. Additional fire protection requirements may be necessary when the applicant submits specific plans for consideration and approval . 7. All buildings over 5,000 square feet require an approved fire sprinkler. system. 5 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION APRIL 1 . 1986 Action: Moved by Commissioner Downs, seconded by Commissioner Wood, adopting the findings as presented by staff. Carried 4-1 (Richards voted no. ) Moved by Commissioner Downs, seconded by Commissioner Wood, adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 1129, recommending approval of DA 84-8A to city council . Carried 4-1 (Richards voted no. ) A FIVE MINUTES RECESS WAS CALLED AT 9: 13 P.M. C. Case No: PP 86 9- DAVE MANOOKIAN, Applicant Request for approval of a precise plan of design to allow 24 residential units and a negative declaration of environmental impact as it relates thereto, for a 60,570 square foot property in the R-3 zone, located at the southeast corner of San Pablo and Santa Rosa. Mr. Diaz outlined the salient points of the staff report and recommended approval . Chairman Crites opened the public testimony and asked the applicant to address the commission. MR. BERNARD LEUNG, architect, indicated that this was the first project for the north side area. He noted that it was within the setback requirements and outlined some of the amenities. Chairman Crites asked If anyone present wished to speak in FAVOR or OPPOSITION to the proposed. MR. TOM BRANICK, 44-160 San Pablo, felt it was a very good project. He indicated that he had asked for a six foot wall and equipment moved from the property line and noted that this had been done. Chairman Crites closed the public testimony. Action• Moved by Commissioner Downs, seconded by Commissioner Wood, adopting the findings as presented by staff. Carried 5-0. Moved by Commissioner Downs, seconded by Commissioner Wood, adopting 7 ' I J MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION APRIL 1, 1986 Planning Commission Resolution No. 1130, approving PP 86-9, subject to conditions. Carried 5-0. D. Case No. PP 86-10 - DAVE MANOOKIAN, Applicant Request for approval of a precise plan of design to allow 16 residential units and a negative declaration of environmental impact as it relates thereto, for a 40, 758 square foot property in the R-3 zone, located on the west side of San Rafael , 100 feet south of Catalina Way. Mr. Diaz outlined the salient points of the staff report and recommended approval . Chairman Crites opened the public testimony and asked the applicant to address the commission. I MR. BERNARD LEUNG, architect, reviewed the amenities of the project. He indicated that a wall had been built by the neighbor to the south. He stated that he would like to replace the 4' wall to the south with a 6' wall and eliminate any ' vacant land between the properties. Chairman Crites asked if anyone present wished to speak in FAVOR or j OPPOSITION to the proposed. ! MS. VERONA STUART, 44-476 San Rafael , asked for clarification regarding setbacks, height, sewer connections, and rental of the property. Mr. Leung clarified these points. MR. DAN HOYER, 44-505 San Carlos, expressed concern for traffic j impacts on Catalina and suggested stop signs for San Rafael and San Carlos. Mr. Diaz Informed Mr. Hoyer that the issue of stop signs being warranted would have to be taken to the traffic committee and recommended that he contact the public works department. Chairman Crites closed the public testimony. Chairman Crites felt that 16 residential units would not create an enormous traffic impact and also suggested that Mr. Hoyer talk with the technical traffic committee via the public works department. 8 i PROOF OF PUBLICATION This space Is for the County Clerk's Filing Stamp (2015iS CrC.P.) (,%iA l 2 4 1486 STATE OF CALIFORNIA. con"R}fliVl' 1'.iF7JICLS 0_;.ARTatrhl1 County of Riverside D171' OF PALM, O-Mril CITY OF PALM DESERT I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; 1 am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to Proof of Publication of or interested in the above-entitled matter. I CASE NO . PP 86-9 am the principal clerk of the printer of the ................................. """" """ DESERT POST . .................................................... t ,CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE -' - CASE NO.PP W9 ..................................................... 'NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will the held before the a newspaper of general circulation, printed ,MANOOKIAN Planning Commission ofia precise plan desig a allowAVE 24 residential unite and a negative declaration of environmental Impact w - B i—week 1 y 8 relates thereto,for a 60.570 square foot property In the R-3 zone. and published .................................. D rn located et the southeast comer of San Pablo and Santa Rom More Pw- ,kularly described as: .. APN's 627.102-0Ot,627-f02-004,827•t02-0OS _.•_".;pr 1,+'- in the City of ...Paym•De.sar-t............• SAID public hearing will be held on Tuesday,April 1,19m at 7:00 pm County of Riverside, and which news- In the Council Chamber at the Palm Desert City Hall,73-510 Fred War- paper Ing Drive,Palm Desert,California,at which time and place all interested paper has been adjudged a newspaper persons are Invited to attend and be heard.It you cnellengs the prapos- of general circulation by the Superior ad actions in court,you may be limited to raising only those lasuea You s `or someone else raised at the public hearing described In this notice.or Court Of the County Of Riverside, Slate Of ' In written correspondence delivered to the city council Or plane g i commission)at or prior to the public hewing ._- } - " '- ,r -.,. ,. RAMON.A.DIAZ,Secre" Y'. California, under the date of.l0 5 19 6.., g- �fi , ; Palm Desert Pjannl gC ms r IPab D P Mar 21 19861 Case Number .$3658......; thai the notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpareil), has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not In any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: 3/21 .................................................... all in the year 19.86.. 1 certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Datedat.... .................. California.this..�istdaofUr, • y - -., 19 8/6.. Sig;ature Fraa coal@&ar this otam form Mal ao secured Iromr CALIFORNIA NEWSPAPER SERVICE BUREAU, INC. Legal Advertising Clearing House 120 West Second St., Los Angeles. Calif. 90012 Telephone: (213) 625.2541 rlaaw raw Ge rase rol m►usnufloa when Wearing this form. CITY OF PALM DESERT DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission DATE: April 1, 1986 CASE NO: PP 86-9 REQUEST: Approval of a precise plan of design and negative declaration of environmental impact to allow construction of a 24 unit apartment project in the R-3 zone located at the southeast corner of San Pablo and Santa Rosa. APPLICANT: DAVE MANOOKIAN P.O. Box 2060 Sun Valley, Idaho 83353 ARCHITECT: BERNARD LEUNG 73-550 Alessandro Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 1. BACKGROUND: A. DESCRIPTION OF SITE: The property is a flat, vacant 60,570 square foot "L" shaped site. Above ground power lines exist along the north, south and west side of the site. Also, along the west property line adjacent to San Pablo are several large tamarisk trees. Along the south property line around the developed site is a cedar board fence. B. ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE: North: R-3/vacant - formerly Macco Contractors South: R-3/vacant East: R-3/vacant West: R-2/vacant C. GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION: High density residential , 7-16 du/acre as per Palma Village Plan. 11. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A. GENERAL: The project consists of 24 two bedroom apartment units provided in three building utilizing two story structures. "Ten of�the units will be 844 square feet and 14 units will be 833 square feet. STAFF REPORT PP 86-9 The R-3 zone allows one unit for every 2500 square feet of lot area. One building will be located adjacent to San Pablo and along Santa Rosa. A 24 foot driveway along the east property line provides access to parking located at the southeast portion of the property and 2 buildings In this area. B. PARKING: Code requires that a total of at least 48 parking spaces be provided for a 24 unit apartment complex of which at least 24 must be covered. The project provides 48 parking spaces (24 garage spaces and 24 open) . C. ARCHITECTURE/DESIGN: The architecture of the project was considered by the architectural commission at its March 25, 1986 meeting and preliminary approval granted. The building at the corner at San Pablo and Santa Rosa is 2 story with flat roofs and an overall height of 22 feet which is in keeping with the recent code amendments relating to height in the R-3 zone. The other two buildings located adjacent to the access driveway are single story 13 foot high structures. III. ANALYSIS: A. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL OF PRECISE PLAN: 1 . The design of the precise plan will not substantially depreciate property values in the vicinity. Justification: The precise plan as approved will comply with code requirements; architectural plans must be approved by the architectural commission and the project will be the first new development in the area in some time. The project should not substantially depreciate property values in the vicinity. 2. The precise plan will not unreasonably interfere with the use of and enjoyment of property in the vicinity by the occupants thereof for lawful purposes. Justification: The surrounding land in the vicinity is zoned for the same type 2 1, STAFF REPORT PP 86-9 of use as proposed and owners would not be deprived the use of their land. 3. The precise plan will no endanger the public peace, health, safety or general welfare. Justification: The precise plan will comply with ail code requirements and must receive architectural commission approval and will not be detrimental to the pub] is peace, health, safety or general welfare. The plan as submitted complies with code. Commission should review the precise plan and determine its adequacy relative to the required findings. B. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The director of community development has determined that the proposed project will not have an adverse environmental impact on the environment and a negative declaration of environmental impact has been prepared. V1. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends: A. Adoption of the findings. B. Adoption of Resolution No. approving PP $6-9. V. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Draft Resolution 2. Legal Notice 3. Draft Development Agreement 4. Comments from City Departments and Agencies 5. Plans and/or Exhibits Prepared by Reviewed and Approved by /dig 3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PRECISE PLAN OF DESIGN AND A NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A 24 UNIT APARTMENT PROJECT AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAN PABLO AND SANTA ROSA. CASE NO. PP 86-9 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 1st day of April , 1986 hold a duly notice public hearing to consider the request by DAVE MANOOK I AN for approval of a precise plan of design and negative declaration of environmental impact to allow construction of a 24 unit apartment complex on a 60,570 square foot site at the southeast corner of San Pablo and Santa Rosa. WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedures to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 80-89" in that the director of community development has determined that the project will not have an adverse impact on the environment and a negative declaration has been prepared. WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments of ail interested persons desiring to be heard, said commission did find the following facts and reasons to exist to justify the granting of said precise plan of design. 1. The design of the precise plan will not substantially depreciate property values in the vicinity. 2. The precise plan will not unreasonably interfere with the use or enjoyment of the property in the vicinity by the occupants thereof for lawful purposes. 3. The precise plan will not endanger the public peace, health, safety or general welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the commission in this case. 2. That approval of Precise Plan 86-9 is hereby granted for reasons subject to the attached conditions. 3. That a negative declaration of environmental impact is hereby certified. PLANNING COMMISSIOWRESOLUTION 'NO. PASSED, APPROVED and 'ADOPTED at a regular, meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this Ist day of April , 1986, by the following vote to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT, ABSTAIN: BUFORD CRITES, Chairman ATTEST: RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary /dlg 2 PLANNING OOMMISSIONiRESOLUTION NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO. PP 86-9 Department of ComtAmitr Development: 1 . The development of the property shall conform substantially with exhibits on file with the department of community development, as modified by the following conditions. 2. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for construction of any uses contemplated by this approval . the applicant shall first complete all the procedural requirements of the city which include, but are not limited to, architectural commission, subdivision process and building permit procedures. 3. Construction of a portion of said project shall commence within one year from the date of final approval unless a time extension is granted, other- wise said approval shall become null , void and of no effect whatsoever. 4. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein which are in addition to all municipal ordinances and state and federal statutes now in force, or which hereafter may be in force. 5. Prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contem- plated by this approval , the applicant shall first obtain permits and/or clearance from the following agencies: Coachella Valley Water District Palm Desert Architectural Commission City Fire Marshal Riverside County Department of Health Palm Desert Water & Services District Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to the department of building and safety at the time of issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. 6. Location and design of trash enclosures shall be coordinated with Palm Desert Disposal Company. 7. Project to be provided with a minimum six foot high solid masonry wall along perimeter property lines (except for approve openings) or other walls or features as may be acceptable to architectural commission. 3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 8. That the owner (developer) prior to Issuance of building permit, provide evidence to the city that he has paid school mitigation fee ($628/unit) to the Desert Sands Unified School District. Department of Public Works: I. Drainage and signalization fund fees, as required by city ordinance, shall be paid prior to grading permit Issuance. 2. Storm drain construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study by the private engineer that is approved by the department of public works. 3. full public improvements, including traffic safety lighting, as required by ordinance and the director of public works, shall be installed in accordance with city standards. 4. Improvement plans for water and sewer systems shall be approved by the respective service districts with "as-built" plans submitted to the department of public works prior to the project final . 5. Complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required by ordinance to the city engineer for checking and approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. The engineer shall submit "as-built" plans prior to acceptance of the improvements by the city. 6. All private driveways and parking lots shall be inspected by the engineering department and a standard inspection fee shall be paid prior to grading permit issuance. 7. Landscaping maintenance on San Pablo and Santa Rosa shall be provided by the property owner. 8. Existing utilities running through the center of the project and on Santa Rosa Way shall be undergrounded per each respective utility district's recommendation. 9. Complete grading plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the city engineer for checking and approval prior to issuance of any permits. 10. Dedication of five feet of right-of-way on San Pablo Avenue and Santa Rosa Way shall be done prior to issuance of any permits and approval of plans. 11 . Installation of curb and gutter, matching paving and sidewalk on Santa Rosa Way and sidewalk on San Pablo Avenue. 4 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12. Offsite improvement plans to be approved by public works department and a surety posted to guarantee the required offsite improvements prior to grading permit issuance. 13. Installation of sewers to serve this project. 14. Size, number and location of driveways to public works specifications with only one driveway approach to be allowed to serve this property. 15. Any permit issuance shall be subject to the waiver of parcel map first being approved and recorded. City Fire Marshal : 1. Install a water system capable of delivering 2500 GPM fire flow from any fire hydrant for a 2 hour duration in addition to domestic supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow Is measured at the time of measurement. 2. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants so that no point of any building is more than 250 feet from a fire hydrant measured along approved vehicular travel ways. a. exterior surface of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow, and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. b. curbs shall be painted red 15 in either direction from each hydrant. C. hydrants shall not be located closer than 25 feet to any building. 3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and three copies of the water system plan to the fire marshal for review. Upon approval , one copy will be sent to the building department and the original will be returned to the developer. 4. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and approved by the water company with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system in PP 86-9 is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the fire marshal". 5. Prior to delivery of combustible materials to the building site, the required water system shall be Installed, operating and delivering the required flow. 6. Additional fire protection requirements may be necessary when the applicant submits specific plans for consideration and approval . 7. All buildings over 5,,000 square feet require an approved fire sprinkler system. 5 INITIAL STUDY Environmental Evaluation Checklist explanation of "yes" and "maybe" answers, possible mitigation measures and comments. 1. EARTH b. The soil on the site, which is vacant, will be over-covered by virtue of construction, paving and landscaping. This activity of the proposed site would not have a negative impact on the environment and no mitigation measures are necessary. e. This proposal may result in temporary wind erosion of soil due to construction - mitigation of impacts will occur by compliance with city requirements for watering during grading and construction phases. 3. WATER b. This proposal will result in a change in absorption rates, drainage patterns and the rate and amount of surface runoff by virtue of development. Compliance with applicable grading ordinances at time of development will mitigate any adverse impacts. 16. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION a. The 24 units could generate up to 10 trips per unit per day. That would amount to 240 trips per day for the project. Trip distribution will be primarily towards Highway III and Fred Waring from San Pablo and the driveway on Santa Rosa. As mitigation measures, street dedications (where applicable) and street improvements will have to be provided. 17. PUBLIC SERVICES C. The Desert Sands Unified School District has advised the city that it is currently experiencing overcrowding conditions and that to mitigate this problem a school impact mitigation fee of $628 per unit is required. The application has been conditioned to require payment of said fee. 23. LIGHT AND GLARE There may be some new lighting provided for safety, security and aesthetic reasons. Mitigation measures will include utilization of lights designed for the appropriate use and provided with shields where necessary. 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 Pursuant to Title 14, Division 6, Article 7, Section 15083 of the California Administrative Code. NEGATIVE DECLARATION CASE NO: PP 86-9 APPLICANT/PROJECT SPONSOR: DAVE MANOOKIAN P.O. Box 2060 Sun Valley, Idaho 83353 BERNARD LEUNG 73-550 Alessandro Palm Desert, CA 92260 PROJECT DESCRIPTION/LOCATION: Twenty four (24) unit apartment complex at the southeast corner of San Pablo and Santa Rosa. The Director of the Department of Community Development, City of Palm Desert, California, has found that the described project will not have a significant effect on the environment. A copy of the initial study has been attached to document the reasons in support of this finding. Mitigation measures, if any, included in the project to avoid potentially significant effects, may also be found attached. RAMON A. DIAZ, DATE DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT /dlg i „ s •. :.....•. .. CASE No. ENVIRONIIENTAL SERVICES DEPT. INITIAL STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION CHECKLIST NOTE: The availability of data necessary to address the topics listed below shall form the basis of a decision as to whether the application is considered complete for purposes of environmental assessment. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers, possible mitigation measures and comments are provided on attached sheets). Yes Maybe No 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth .conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? — — — b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction, or overcovering of the soil? — — — c. Change in topography or ground surface relief ✓ features? — d. The destruction, covering, or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? _ e. Any -increase in wind or water erosion of _ soils, either on or off the site? V 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors? C. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any change in climate, / either locally or regionally? V Z Yes Maybe No 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: a..Lhanges in currents, 'or the course or / 1'• direction of water movements?. b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? c. Alterations to the 'course or flow of flood waters? d. Alteration of.the direction or rate of / flow of ground waters? 1/ e. Change in the quantity. of_ground waters, either through direct additions or with- drawals, or through interception of an / aquifer by cuts or excavations? f. Reduction in the amount of water other- wise available for public water supplies? — — — 4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, and crops)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, V or endangered species of plants? - c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal _ replenishment of existing species? 5. Animal Life. Will the proposal 'result in: a. Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, or insects)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, / rare, or endangered species of animals? V c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to / the migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration to existing wildlife %. . habitat? - V - f -------------- 3. Yes No 6. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a. Increase inrthe rate of use of any natural ✓ resources? - r — — b. Depletion ofeany non-renewable natural resource? 7. Energy. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial 'amounts of fuel or energy? — — ✓ b. Demand upon existing sources of energy, or re- quire the.deselopment of new sources of energy? V 8. Risk of U settti0oes the proposai .involve a risk of an explosion or the release of i hazardous substances (including, but not, limited to, pesticides, oil, chemicals, or radiation) in ✓ the event of an accident or upset conditions? :c — — — 9. Economic Loss. Will the proposal result in: :1 a: A change in the value of property and improvements endangered by flooding? b. A change in the value of property and improvenentsrexposed to geologic hazards — — beyond accepted corrunity risk standards? 10. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels toethe point at which accepted community noise and vibration levels are exceeded? ;i v 11. Land Use. Willethe proposal result in the a tTa[ion of the present developed or planned land use of an area? - V 12. Open Space. Will the proposal lead to a decrease in theramount of designated open . space? V 13. Population. Will the proposal result in: a. Alteration of` the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human Population of- the Citv? v b. Change in the population distribution by age, income,:2�eligion, racial , or ethnic group, occupational class, household type? l/ M 4. Yes Maybe No 14. Emoloyment. Will the proposal result in additions new long-term Jobs provided, or a change in the number and per cent employed, unemployed, and underemployed? - 15. Housing. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in number and per cent of housing units by type (price or rent range, zoning category, owner-occupied and rental , etc.) relative to demand or to number of families in various income classes in the City? _ b. Impacts on existing housing or creation of a — demand for additional housing? 16. Trans ortation/Circulation. Will the proposal / su t in:Fes a. Generation of additional vehicular• movement? _V b. Effects an existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? _ C. Impact upon existing transportation systems? _ d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation / or movement of people and/or goods? e. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists, or pedestrians? 17. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or resu [ in a need for, new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: / a. Fire protection? 'b. Police protection? c. Schools? d. Parks or other recreational facilities? e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? f. Other governmental services? _ Yes Maybe No 18. Public Fiscal Balance. Will the proposal result in a net change in government fiscal flow (revenues less operating expenditures —and annualized capital expenditures)? V/ 19. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or- natural gas? v b. Communications system? C. Water? d. Sewer or septic tanks? e. Storm water drainage? v f. Solid waste and disposal? 20. Human Health. Will the proposal result in: JL a. The creation of any health hazard or Potential health hazard? b. A change in the level of community health care provided? v - 21. Social Services. Will the proposal result in an increased demand for provision of general social services? 22. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in: a. Obstruction of any scenic vista or view / open to the public? �/ b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive / site open to public view? 1/ c. Lessening of the overall neighborhood - (or area) attractiveness, pleasantness, -- -- � - - and uniqueness? 23. Liaht and Glara. Will the proposal produce new tg t or g are? 24. Archeological/Historical. Will the proposal resu t to an a teratton of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, — — object, or building? . 6. Yes Mavbe No 2 Mandatcry Findings of Sicnificancs. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment or to curtail the diversity in the environment? ✓ b. Oces the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future. ) c. Does the project have impacts which are indi- vidually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact an each resource is relatively small , but where the effect of the total of those impacts an the environment is significant. ) — d. Oces the project have environmental effects Jz which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings , either directly or indirectly? Initial Study Prepared By: ` � INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM City of Palm Desert TO: RAY DIAZ, DIRECTOR COMMUNTIY SERVICES FROM: BRENT CONLEY, CRIME PREVENTION SUBJECT: PP 86-9 DATE: MARCH 6, 1986 Per proposed plans, the entry doors should be of solid core construction, equipped with dead bolt lock and 190 degree viewer to prevent forced entry, and viewing of potential problems. Also, the sliding glass doors and windows should be equipped with locking devices. The addressing to the residences should be clearly marked with 3" lettering and illuminated to allow greater visability. The entire complex needs to be properly illuminated to prevent undetected vehicle and residential entry. This can be accomplished with the use of malibu lighting, accompanied with individual resident lighting. The parking lot area should be illuminated with the use of mercury vapor or conpressure sodium lighting. If there are any questions or comments, contact me at ext: 303. BRENT CONLEY CRIME PREVENTION OFFICER /fr RT%zERSIDI: C`UtrN'r}, 4p1�ofca\rFo9y f FIRE DEPAR'F.kIEN1' I N COOPERATION Wif H THE 111_. H7/ \'T)'.;=i_;�a`�'1v CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY RAY HEBRARD '9t�FMT of ' FIRE CHIEF 210 WEST SAN JACINTO AVENUE FE 6 R Q A Ry 7-11,193 PERRIS,CALIFORNIAN7�F 92370 Raymon Diaz a6�3�7 jf.1t 3183 Planning and Community L� Development Director (- [B 2 S 73510 Fred Waring 1986 Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 COMMUNITY SEmJICES DEPARTMENT CITY OF PALM DESER'i � Reference: pP86-9 Applicant: PAVE MANaaKlAk Dear Mr. Ramon Diaz The following fire protection requirements are in accordance with the Uniform Fire Code and Life Safety Code standards. 1 . Install a water system capable of delivering 2SooGPM fire flow from any fire hydrant for a 2 hour duration in addition to domestic supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement. Fire flow require- ments will depend on built-in fire protection provisions of buildings . 2. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants so that no point of any building is more than 25o feet from a fire hydrant measured along approved vehicular travel ways . a. exterior surface of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow, and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. b. curbs shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. c. hydrants shall not be located closer than 25 feet to any building. 3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and three copies of the water system plan to the Fire Marshal for review. Upon approval , one copy wi11 .be sent to the Building Department and the original will be returned to the developer. 4. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and approved by the water company with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system in PP ?$-9 is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Fire Marshal ." 5. Prior to delivery of combustible materials to the building site, the required water system shall be installed, operating and delivering the required flow. 6. Additional fire protection requirements may be necessary when the applicant submits specific plans for consideration and approval . 7. All buildings over 5o00 square feet require an approved fire sprinkler system. Very truly yours, RAY HEBRARD �yFyi�re� �C�h,AiAef „ / MIKE MCCONNELL Fire Marshal w ATEq ESTABLISHED IN 1918 AS A PUBLIC AGENCY ��STRIC� COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT POST OFFICE BOX 1056•COACHELLA, CALIFORNIA 92236•TELEPHONE(619)398-2651 DIRECTORS OFFICERS RAYMOND R.RUMMONDS,PRESIDENT THOMAS E.LEVY,GENERAL MANAGER-CHIEF ENGINEER TELLIS CODEKAS,VICE PRESIDENT BERNARDINE SUITON,SECRETARY JOHN P.POWELL KEITH H.AINSWORTH,ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER/AUDITOR PAUL W.NICHOLS REDWINE AND SHERRILL,ATTORNEYS THEODORE J.FISH March 3, 1986 File: 0163. 11 Department of Environmental Services City of Palm Desert f' Wt'� 5 1986 Post Office Box 1977 CJflS FUNITv y- Palm Desert, California 92261 Cav:G-z", Cp-PR;,Tg E4T CITY OF FALPa O%uc!dT Gentlemen: Subject: Precise Plan 86-9, Portion of Northeast quarter, Section 20, Township 5 South, Range 6 East, San Bernardino Meridian This area is protected from stormwater flows by a system of channels and dikes, and may be considered safe from stormwater flows except in rare instances. This area is shown to be subject to shallow flooding and is designated Zone AO, depth 1 foot on Federal Flood Insurance rate maps which are in effect at this time. However, we expect the maps to be revised due to the construction of the Palm Valley Stormwater Project. The District will furnish sanitation service to this area in accordance with the current regulations of this District. These regulations provide for the payment of certain fees and charges by the subdivider and said fees and charges are subject to change. This area shall be annexed to Improvement District Nos. 54 and 80 of Coachella Valley Water District for sanitation service. Yours very truly, Tom Levy neral Manager-Chief Engineer CS:ir cc: Riverside County Department of Public Health 46-209 Oasis Street Indio, California 92201 TRUE CONSERVATION Attention: Don Park USE WATER WISELY INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL SE \ j�\t.�f � FROM: DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS FLB 2 7 M6 SUBJECT: ?P gKq-1 corc,lauurn'srn-v1r"^.n,;n:urm:rcr DATE: CIfY OF I ALM Dl.!I 14'1 �&,Zl) I`186 The following should be considered conditions of approval : (D Drainage and signalization fund fees, as required by City ordinance, shall be paid prior to ireeardatlen aF "" 91pa ^4 .44X� permit Issuance) . gradnnqq 2) Drainage f�tllitles shall be provided, per Ordinance No. 210 and the Master Drainage Plan, to the specifications of the Director of Public Works. O3 Storm drain construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study by the private engineer that is approved by the Department of Public Works. _ Full public Improvements, Including traffic safety lighting, - as required by ordinance and the Director of Public Works, [4I shall be Installed in accordance with City standards. / OS Improvement plans for water and sewer systems shall be approved by the respective service districts with "as-built" plans submitted to the Department of Public Works prior to the project final . © Complete Improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the City Engineer . for checking and approval before construction of any Improvements is commenced. The engineer shall submit "as-built" plans prior to the acceptance of ,the Improvements by the City. ihaII a �arly lots All private d I s a In acted by the engineering . department and a standard Inspection fee shall be paid prior to (rPgRr� - the `1"e1 '"e") (An" permit Is- _ n suence) . _ 9�aoli n� a f2e R�L,I.. A, 2rnc�s h I e � BO Landscaping maintenance on Sa._, b� b_ s al be provided by the (property owner). +� nronw . r s k -o4ta icWnrzr round- p i;l J vvk O9 Existing utilities �w � �--�- ., shad be underground- �.� � ed per each respective utility district's recommendation.. S.,"-Ca Resa - WaY 10) Traffic safety striping on - shall be provided to the specifications of the Director of Public Works. A traffic control plan must be submitted to and approved by the Director of Public Works before placing pavement markings. Complete grading plans and specifications shall be submit- ted, as required by ordinance, to the City Engineer for checking and approval prior to Issuance of any permits. . . 12 Dedication ppf 1 w feet of right-of-way Sa+ Pabb P u2 on �--+-- ems. shall be done prior to Issuance of any permits and approval of plans. ;, 13 Installation of curb and gutter, matching paving and _ sidewalk on Sa. V�a Wa , ;L J " " ^lk - <- Pahl... AVQ,YILw, 14) Waiver of access to except at approved locations shall be granted on the final map. 15) Close unused driveway with full heighth curb and gutter. Z 16 Offslte Improvement, plans to be approved by Public Works ',': . Department and a surety posted to guarantee the requlred ! offslte Improvements prior to - maWn(permit Issuance) . raj r�I 17) FuR ImprZ7vement of Interior streets based on (60' residen tlal ) (private) ( Industrial ) street standards as established In accordance with Chapter 26, Section 26.40.040, C.P.D. : Code. 18) Installation of one-half landscaped median In or cash payment for one-half the cost of landscaped median, at the option of the Director of Public Works. ; 19) Traffic analysis to be prepared for the project to address the specific Impacts on existing networks (street and - Intersections) and the proposed mitigation measures recofi- mended for approval by the City. installation of sewers to serve this project. Its ZI Size, number and location of driveways to Public Works 1 specifications with only gaq .,___ driveway approach(es) to be allowed to serve this property. 22) No (new) requirements. (Original conditions apply) Z3 Any permit Issuance shall be subject to the waiver of /J parcel map first being approved and recorded. _ 24) Complete (parcel ) (tract) map(s) shall be submitted as required by ordinance to the City Engineer for checking and approval and be recorded before Issuance of certificate of occupancy by the Building Department. - ) i (chard J olkers, P.E. RA/RJF , ' i Palm abedert Water & Services eAjtrict 44.500 PORTOLA AVENUE BOX 161 PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92261 BOARD OF DIRECTORS: Phone:(619)346-6338 ROBERT C. H. LAWMAN, President R.CLAIR McDONOUGH SHARON K. EPPS March 7, 1986 PHYLLIS GRIGGS, District Secretary Mr. Ramon Diaz Director, Environmental Services City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, California 92260 Re: Case No. PP 86-9 Dave Manookian, 24-Unit Apartment Complex Lots 1 , 4, and 5, of Palma Village Groves Santa Rosa Way at San Pablo Avenue Dear Mr. Diaz: In response to your letter regarding the above referenced project, we would like to make the following comments: 1 . The property is within the existing boundary of the Palm Desert Water and Services District. 2. The District will provide domestic water service to the property. 3. Frontage fee of $15.00 per foot will be imposed along Santa Rosa Way. 4. The District will install two 1z-inch water meters at a cost of $1 ,350.00 - each. 5. The water service installation charges will be as follows: Two 1?-inch water meter @ $1 ,350.00 $2,700.00 Frontage Fee for 346 feet @ $15.00 /ft 5,190.00 Total $7,890.00 6. An approved 1z-inch backflow prevention device must be installed as part of the plumbing. Mr. Ramon Diaz March 7, 1986 Page Two 7. All fees and meter installation charges must be paid before the installation work will begin. 8. At least one week advance notice should be given. 9. There is an existing fire hydrant at the northeast corner of the project site. Also there is an existing hydrant across San Pablo Avenue to the west which may have to be upgraded. The addition of any fire hydrants, the upgrading, or the relocation of any existing, if required by the City Fire Marshall , would be completed at the owner's expense. 10. A fire sprinkler service connection, if fire sprinklers are required by the City Fire Marshall , would be completed at additional charges and conditions to be determined upon request and according to the District's standards, at the developer's expense. If you have any questions in regard to the above, please contact us. Very truly yours, Robert C.H. Lawman, President cc: Mainiero, Smith and Associates, Inc. INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL SER e C3,3 ' FROM : DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS ��..L 11:dd SUBJECT: ?P oQ_1 COM114UNI,'Y SERVICF;,", Drf?-;RTIVIEiNT DATE: rs13• 2-1 C11Y OF PALIA t±t:URr The following should be considered conditions of approval : © Drainage and signalization fund fees , as required by City ordinance, ' shall be paid prior to tl -- ef the 91PRI permit issuance) . gfAllnnqq 2 ) Drainage fa'filities shall be provided , per Ordinance No. 216 and the Master Drainage Plan , to the specifications of the Director of Public Works, 0Storm drain construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study by the private engineer that is approved by the Department of Public Works . Full public improvements , including traffic safety lighting, as required by ordinance and the Director of Public Works , shall be installed in accordance with City standards . O Improvement plans for water and sewer systems shall be approved by the respective service districts with "as-built" plans submitted to the Department of Public Works prior to the project final . © Complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the City Engineer for checking and approval before construction of any Improvements is commenced . The engineer shall submit "as-built" plans prior to the acceptance of the Improvements by the City. � � ins j � All private ! F sha� l a in ected by the engineering department and a standard inspection fee shall be paid prior to ^,an.y permit is- suance) . 94a Invj © Landscaping maintenance on ��a �i�-+I � �+�Shal i bse j provided by the - ' ^` `^^' (property owner) nn and r our.G�a.proid`t� O9 Existing utilities �� sha l be undergrground- ed per each respective utility district' s recommendation., Santa Ro52 WaY 10 ) Traffic safety striping on shall be provided to the specifications of the Director of Public Works . A traffic control plan must be submitted to and approved by the Director of Public Works before placing pavement markings . 11 Complete grading plans and specifications shall be submit ted , as required by ordinance , to the City Engineer for checking and approval prior to issuance of any permits . . , r 12 Dedication of irp feet of right-of-way on «�'c a .� a shall be done prior to Issuance of any permits and approval of plans . 1 l3 installation of curb and gutter , matching paving and sidewalk on 'rZ a a 1 s,sLa gal b v,., Sam, Ra bl AVQ,,viLw_, 14 ) Waiver of access to except at approved locations shall be granted on the final map. i . 15) Close unused driveway with full heighth curb and gutter . Z 16 Offsite improvement plans to be approved by Public Worksj,' Department and a surety posted to guarantee the required ': offsite improvements prior to , ..,...-..data "e" & I . FRap)^(perrrrrmit issuance) . 17 ) Ful�`�pr0',vement of interior streets based on (60 ' residen tial ) (private ) ( industrial ) street standards as established In accordance with Chapter 26 , Section 26. 40 . 040 , C .P. D.. Code . 18) Installation of one-half landscaped median in or cash payment for one-half the cost of landscaped median ,, at the option of the Director of Public Works . 19) Traffic analysis to be prepared for the project to address the specific Impacts on existing networks (street and Intersections) and the proposed mitigation measures recom- mended for approval by the City. l3 20 Installation of sewers to serve this project. I 2l Size , number and location of driveways to Public Works specifications with only A26g. driveway approach es ) to be allowed to serve this property. 22 ) No ( new) requirements . (Original conditions apply) 23 Any permit issuance shall be subject to the waiver of parcel map first being approved and recorded. 24) Complete (parcel ) (tract) map(s ) shall be submitted as required by ordinance to the City Engineer for checking and approval and be recorded before Issuance of certificate of occupancy by the Building Department . ichard J olkers , P. E . RA/RJF i � i i� CASE NO. i ENVIRON!fENTAL SERVICES DEPT. INITIAL STUDY ENVIRONyiENTAL EVALUATION CHECKLIST NOTE: The availability of data necessary to address the topics listed below shall form the basis of a decision as to whether the application is considered complete for purposes of environmental assessment. ENVIRONIMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers, possible mitigation measures and comments are provided on attached sheets) . Yes Maybe No 1 . Earth. Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? — — — b. Disruptions , displacements , compaction, or overcovering of the soil? — — — c. Change in topography or ground surface relief ✓ features? d. The destruction, covering, or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils , either on or off the site? _ 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air / quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors? — — c. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? i 2r Yes Maybe No 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: a... Changes in currents , 'or the course or 4 direction of water movements? v b. Changes in absorption rates , drainage. patterns, or the rate and amount of v surface water runoff? c. Alterations to the course or flow of — — flood waters? d. Alteration of.the direction or rate of / flow of ground waters? V e. Change in the quantity of- ground waters, I either through direct additions or with- drawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? f. Reduction in the amount of water other- / wise available for public water supplies? 4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of plants (including trees , shrubs , grass , and crops)? V - b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, / or endangered species of plants? 1! c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area , or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? S. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds , land animals including reptiles , or — — insects)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or endangered species of animals? c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier- to / the migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration to existing wildlife j habitat? V r y� 4'' 3. Yes M_ybe No 6. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in .•:the rate of use of any natural / resources? - V r _ b. Depletion ofeany non-renewable natural resource? j 7. Energy. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? — — ✓ b. Demand upon existing sources of energy, or re- quire the.deselopment of new sources of / energy? V Sti — —S. Risk of Upset-.-;Does the proposal .involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not. limited to, pesticides, ail , chemicals, or radiation) in ✓ the event of an accident or upset conditions? 9. Economic Loss. Will the proposal result in: A. a. A change in the value of property and improvements endangered by flooding? t* - — — b. A change in the value of property and improvementsrexposed to geologic hazards _ — beyond accepted community risk standards? 10. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels toethe point at which accepted community noise and vibration levels are / exceeded? i v 11. Land Use. Willethe proposal result in the a tTation of the present developed or planned land use of an area? — 12. Open Space. ' Will the proposal lead to a decrease in theramount of designated open / space? 1/ 13. Population. Will the proposal result in: a. Alteraticn of the location, distribution , density, or growth rate of the human population of- the City? b. Change in the population distribution by age, income,'4-eligion, racial , or ethnic / group, occupational class , household type? — _ ✓_ 4. Yes Maybe No 14. Employment. Will the proposal result in additiona new long-term jobs provided, or a change in the number and per cent employed, unemployed, and underemployed? 15. Housing. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in number and per cent of housing units by type (price or rent range, zoning category, owner-occupied and rental , / etc. ) relative to demand or to number of families in various income classes in the City? _ b. Impacts on existing housing or creation of a — demand for additional housing? 11. Trains o_rtation/Circulation. Will the proposal / result in: a. Generation of additional vehicular movement? V _ b. Effects on existing parking facilities , or demand for new parking? _ c. Impact upon existing transportation systems? d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation / or movement of people and/or goods? _ _ _V/ e. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , / bicyclists, or pedestrians? V 17. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for, new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? b. Police protection? _ _ _✓ c. Schools? d. Parks or other recreational facilities? e. Maintenance of public facilities , including ✓ roads? f. Other governmental services? _ i'~ l Yes Maybe No 18. Public Fiscal Balance. Will the proposal result in a net change in government fiscal flow (revenues less operating expenditures _ and annualized capital expenditures)? 19. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems , or alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or- natural gas? _ _ v b. Communications system? c. Water? d. Sewer or septic tanks? e. Storm water drainage? v f. Solid waste and disposal? 20. Human Health. Will the proposal result in: JL a. The creation of any health hazard or — — potential health hazard? . _ b. A change in the level of community health — care provided? v 21 . Social Services. Will the proposal result in _ an increased denand for provision of general social services? 22. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in: a. Obstruction of any scenic vista or view / open to the public? v b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive --- site open to public view? 1/ c. Lessening of the overall neighborhood (or area) attractiveness, pleasantness,and uniqueness? 23. Licht and Glar3. Will the proposal produce ne:a light or g are? 24. Archeoloaical/Historical . Will the proposal resu t to an a teration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, — — object, or building:' , 6. Yes Maybe No 25. Mandatary Findings of Significance. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade / the quality of the environment or to curtail 1// the diversity in the environment? b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future. ) c. Does the project have impacts which are indi- vidually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small , but where-the effect of / the total of those impacts on the environment is significant. ) d. Does the project have environmental effects / which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings , either directly or indirectly? _ Initial Study Prepared By: SKI Bernard K. K. Leung & Ar -iates L�4�[ 3 O� °�i Q�SEOUMQL A.I.A. ARCHITECT 73-550 Alessandro Dr. Suite 2 PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 DATE JOB NO. 2• (•�•CJ�P (619) 346.4225 ATTENTION TO C07F\JE SMITE c 1-PX OF F'ADI Q F_tiOE Z( C1•��Kt N cz����—T WE ARE SENDING YOU Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: ❑ Shop drawings )< Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ,! h1kykl COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION I 2• \c('6(v ((cuWIT C_7X(! FISQ. VIAECt�22 VLJ�-N (11NC.1_u91VJ(i h 1ROtI 2 •\ a 'g :, -14uio c T of p t2 c�uolw c�, Ior� l 2 .1C('6(a 1(pu)-J CIM F I `Z' \q '8 u 1?2- CU_W9_R_13 L b V S 9' l4,uN rT 6 2 '25'8f- '24 u 1T P V- V% tw rz w PLIC4ti THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submitcopies for distribution ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS 'D((J NV-D AF_''\\OAV 1T' \`.J LC_*)U'111n1(n (DV--) ((0 Ur 1i.V IT c.EYZT- I RED Moe, cx�_)`t-jE o L jtLT_ COPY TO SIGNED: rxoouoT242 I-,anon a.n 01471_ if enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. 627-102-001 627-103-001 627-103-011 Ralph Santopietro Blake Huff Bruce J Reimer PO BOX 1166 4220 Toluca Lake Lane PO BOX 1087 Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 Burbank, CA 91505 Palm Desert, CA 92260 627-102-002 Leonard F Umatun 627-111-001 & 002 & 003 Thomas A Branick 3636 St Elizabeth Road Robert R Mclachlan 6917 Fountain Avenue Glendale, CA 91206 74075 E1 Paseo Los Angeles , CA 90028 627-103-002 Palm Desert , CA 92260 627-102-003 627-103-003 627-111-004 & 015 Oleta Hardisty FE&M Inc, Employee Profit Carl W Kisner 74451 De Anza Way 918 Thompson Avenue 72300 Rancho Road Palm Desert, CA 92260 1 Glendale, CA 91201 Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 I 627-102-006 627-103-004 627-111-006 & 007 Paul F. White Joe Delreal Robert R Mclachlan 77740 Delsware PLace 1457 Bay Point 74075 E1 Paseo Palm Desert, CA 92260 Wilmington, CA 90744 Palm Desert , CA 92260 627-102-007 1 627-103-005 627-111-008 Richard K Raymond Duane R Baker Iraj Naimi Akbar 44185 El Cecardo Drive 4111 Crisp Canyon 82231 Highway 111 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Indio, CA 92201 627-102-008 627-103-006 627-111-009 & 010 David Duro Joel Bruce Reimer Danavon L Horn 44195 El Cercado 73655 Santa Rosa-.Vay #6 PO BOX 1638 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Desert,, CA 92260 Palm Desert, CA 92260 627-102-009 627-103-007 627-111-011 Lyn De Farms Inc Philip J Hartman Ruthella M Gibbons PO Drawer 1119 6592 Burnham 10417 Oletha Lane Blythe, CA 92226 Buena Park, CA 90621 Los Angeles , CA 90077 627-102-010 627-103-008 627-111-012 Ronald D Manning Lynn Nielsen Constanine Coty 44170 E1 Cercado Street 73655 Santa Rosa Way #8 2005 Noya Loace Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palos Verdes Estates , Ea 627-102-011 627-103-009 627-042-015 Naomi H Heale Earl H Laffoon David L Evans PO BOX 654 73655 Santa Rosa Way #9 73445 Santa Rosa Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Desert, CA 92260 627-102-012 627-103-610 David H Stoltzman Stanley Reimer PO BOX 2096 35120 Maria Road Palm Desert, CA 92260 Cathedral City, CA 92260 627-041-015 , 016 & 017 627-042-035 627-101-005 P E Kirkpatrick Ibolya Hideg Sam Montoya Jr P.O. BOX 128 PO BOX 2072 73585 Avenue 44 Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Desert, CA 92260 627-101-006 627-041-032 & 033 &037 627-051-016 Thomas R Cerecedes P E Kirkpatrick Bernard A Rogers 950 Server Avenue PO BOX 128 74163 Parosella Street Los Angeles, CA 90022 Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 Palm Desert, CA 92260 627-101-008 627-041-034 627-051-017 Mr. Jerrl Salyers . Mr & Mrs Jack J Gattenio Arnold W Porsch 14009 Cormuta Avenu PO BOX 910 PO BOX 742 Bellflower, CA 90706 Frasier Park, CA 93225 Palm Desert, CA 92261 627-041-035 Shawn D Huber t 627-101-017Mary E Valdez Mr & Mrs Peter Griffiths . 73465 San Nicholas Avenue 73558 Santa Rosa Way 73460 Santa Rosa Way Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Desert, CPT 92260 627-051-018 627-101-020 627-041-036 & 6M42,014 627-051-019 & 037 Benjamin W Bales City of Palm Desert City of Palm Desert 73578 Santa Rosa Way 45275 Prickley Pear Lane 45275 Prickley Pear Lane Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Desert, CA 92260 627-042-016 627-101-021, 022 & 037 627-051-035 William G Spencer Jack P Einstoss Kenneth Elmer Clark 72770 Homestead Road 722 N Calle Rolph 725BO Moonridge Ln Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Springs , CA 92262 Palm Desert, CA 92260 627-101-033 & 039 627-042-017 627-051-636 Carla B Dickerson Domenic J Mungo Hannah R Gordon 79525 .Mandevelle Road 8935 Bolsa Avenue 9875idor Drive Indio, CA . 92201 Westminster, CA 92683 Los Angeles, CA 90035 627-042-018, 032 & 036 627-101-035 627-101-002 Gordon M. Keenoy City of .Palm Sesert William J Maccabe 72080 Palm Haven Drice 45275 Prickley Pear Lane 2716 castle Heighs P1 i RAncho Mirage,CA 92270 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Los Angeles, CA 90034 627-101-036 627-042-033 627-101-003 Albert Nalick Wilmer K McGregor Stephen B Andrews 347 Peck Drive 5522 Cambria Court 143 Kentucky Ave S E Beverly Hills, CA 90212 San Diego, CA 92120 Washington, D C 20003 1 627-101-038 627-042-034 627-101-004 Tucker Sattley Land Co Darell Little Vee Ching Shaw 74050 San Marino Circle 73450 San Nicholas Avenue 68450 Alcita Road Palm Deserr, CA 92260 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Cathedral City, CA 92234 46-Z75 PRICXLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESLTT, CAUFORNIA SZZS0 ITE-UPHONE (714) 346-0611 ?9F�`.7 CIF B]?IDIlv'G =-R OF MANS '-S IS rI71: AFrM ` AJ EL I A ny =IA71=: Atj A-tk Dr-- jt-S Oij S 2, 6 AtAce, sk-w t c G<na,40 Fri ANT IS r FM =7.. . ❑ ARD ._L-IVBAL MAN= Arm ��xck�.� _] ays= =r-7 AL II 7-4;y-= Arm C T r7n b =ls V.A.C. , 'zr=.' LT-M , t"'.Ia F-r:_Mz= mi1NS Fs �.�"_c'.1m l� C x-=-=— 24 -"%7:-z,GY Q CST."� GF-0nz F-Am DIRECTOR OF BUILDING 6 SAFT_T; Gt:il�Tr off 1 11.mni . 21Dc&=m2v� 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 March 13, 1986 CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE CASE NO. PP 86-9 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by DAVE MANOOKIAN for approval of a precise plan of design to allow 24 residential units and a negative declaration of environmental impact as it relates thereto, for a 60,570 square foot property in the R-3 zone, located at the southeast corner of San Pablo and Santa Rosa, more particularly described as: APN's 627-102-001 627-102-004 627-102-005 COLLEGE OF HE DESERT P� awn — P -- a 3 FRED WARING DRIVE formerly 44thF a - I I I I JR-12 ) ) aN TA R054 yl WAY W "A N A 1 0 5 A i d w - I I I I I F � 'I NI4N '_ .15 AVENUE ` •••• ''•"• — a S ; S.O.----- R-F 1 I'l SUBJECT PROPERTY S. - c4rauNa ®. z o a e UA 0A LU PE AVENUE m 2 S.0 a w - ( ) ) a Z 2 W W _ � QR-1 N H ROYAL j PAL M GHIVE �4 0 S o R-2 (5) w R-2 (5)': R2(5) R-I %'R-1 R=1 i R_I R N o ~ R F)AW fi uSAN 2 GOR GONIO WAY R*I e I .I SAID public hearing will beheld on Tuesday, April I , 1986 at 7:00 p.m. In the Council Chamber at the Palm Desert City Hall , 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. If you challenge the proposed actions In court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the city council (or planning commission) at, or prior to, the public hearing. PUBLISH: Desert Post RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary March 14, 1986 Palm Desert Planning Commission + • ` 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 March 13, 1986 CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE CASE NO. PP 86-9 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by DAVE MANOOKIAN for approval of a precise plan of design to allow 24 residential units and a negative declaration of environmental impact as It relates thereto, for a 60,570 square foot property in the R-3 zone, located at the southeast corner of San Pablo and Santa Rosa, more particularly described as: APN's 627-102-001 627-102-004 627-102-005 SAID public hearing will beheld on Tuesday, April 1 , 1986 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber at the Palm Desert City Hall , 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all interested persons are Invited to attend and be heard. If you challenge the proposed actions in court. you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at 1=he public hearing described in this notice. or in written correspondence delivered to the city council (or planning commission) at, or prior to, the public hearing. PUBLISH: Desert Post RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary March 14, 1986 Palm Desert Planning Commission 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 March 13, 1986 CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE CASE NO. PP 86-9 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by DAVE MANOOKIAN for approval of a precise plan of design to allow 24 residential units and a negative declaration of environmental impact as it relates thereto, for a 60,570 square foot property in the R-3 zone, located at the southeast corner of San Pablo and Santa Rosa, more particularly described as: APN's 627-102-001 627-102-004 627-102-005 SAID public hearing will beheld on Tuesday, April 1 , 1986 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber at the Palm Desert City Hall , 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. If you challenge the proposed actions in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the city council (or planning commission) at, or prior to, the public hearing. PUBLISH: Desert Post RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary March 14, 1986 Palm Desert Planning Commission • ` 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 March 13, 1986 CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE CASE NO. PP 86-9 NOTICE 15 HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by DAVE MANOOKIAN for approval of a precise plan of design to allow 24 residential units and a negative declaration of environmental impact as it relates thereto, for a 60,570 square foot property in the R-3 zone, located at the southeast corner of San Pablo and Santa Rosa, more particularly described as: APN's 627-102-001 627-102-004 627-102-005 i SAID public hearing will beheld on Tuesday, April I , 1986 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber at the Palm Desert City Hall , 73-5I0 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert. California, at which time and place all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. If you challenge the proposed actions In court. you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the city council (or planning commission) at, or prior to. the public hearing. PUBLISH: Desert Post RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary March 14, 1986 Palm Desert Planning Commission �J w ivro s COLLEGE OF rHE DESERT P� HANOHO mRp *R� Ril F 3 FRED WARING DRIVE formerIv 44t F,- a ANTA R 0 S A w WAY c w iln'a J El z ' ; lOSA s a 0. ee N U E S.O. R-1 A i A L I N A WAY SUBJECT PROPERTY S. © 1 w rn - car? LING z o a a UA CALIIPE AVE N UE m 2 S.0 w a w \ " n N ( , R-I , N i Q RUYAL RALM CHIVE ¢ Q' R" f P a J < o R-2 (5) w R. (5): R•2(5) 18,(70 `moo 0 P. a R-1 //R-I .'R_I f R-j N H y o w R z z o SAN f GORG ONIO w —��; µpY a — a .R=1- I�\ R}1 RF =1" CI-I,_S'.P. ° C-I S: P I a CAI $.;e ` ° 1 R' °E + c-I 's.a Q �j ` - -9 y� M --'� 1�� =1.` nAa !C-I, I� � YY O 11 t5 .;M G41yW/ i '�M� , C—I W \Y YY PQVUI w ORIV I _ CI_, SP w I I I I I I C71 C-1 C-'1 C- I, S.P C-I C=1 ar Q R-3 (4) `' z ` R-3 201000( T'JM IEWE 9P° �a` -- R-3(4T s 'P.R.-6 >< L A R REA P. u EO Aj = a r R.- 16 _ R 3(4) R-3 (C.U.P.-1472) R-3(4) = i-3 20 0!00 (3) �(4) � sMApOW M 0 U N T AINN ORIVE SHADOW MOUNTAIN + ! DRIVE R-3 13 000 (3) i ( i I i, R 3! 13,Q00 R-1 IR-1 12, 00 R-1 / JOS H U A TREE STREET HA W L 1 I R-I 12 00 ` RBI 20,000 16 000 _ R-� -( I .• . P.R.- 0^ Q J U N I P E STRE E T (C.U.R 03 73 201000 R-: 20;000 2 I . 0 P N Y O N S T R E E T -R:-t-20-000• 12-12o-000 - - + R�( %�-- C '77 JF R%LK © 2 � 24 Unit 73-510 Fred Waring Dr.. Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 PRECISE PLAN �APPL:QMC H F-CH6:H : Dept.of Planning and Community Development MR. MANOOKIAN Applicant (please print) P. O. BOX 2060 (208) 622-5767 Telephone ,b)alling Address SUN VALLEY IDAHO 83353 City State Zip-Coca REQUEST: (Describe specific nature of approval requested). 24 UNIT APARTMENT PROJECT PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: LOTS #1, 4 AND 5 OF PALM VILLAGE GARDEN TRACT SECTION 20 TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH RANGE 6 EAST S.B.M. ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 627-102-991-7 and 627-102-005-1 and 627-102,-nO4-n EXISTING ZONING R-3 SO - 1 unit/2500 Property Owner Authorization The unaersigneo states that they are the owner ls) of the property described herein and hereby give outhor- izo�r the filing of this application. �JJ/�/ Si hatuurs Dole A'greament absowing ine City of F41m Desert of all Iiooilihes relative to any deed restrictions. 1 00 BY MY SIGNATURE.,00N THIS YAGRE"erNT, Adoltvee ythhe Carl doff bPalm me p t at all liabilities liasdribe re rradinganyydeed restrictions hc r / t Si ature Dote Applicants Signature z/-- i Lure Date (FOR STAFF USE ONLY) Environmental Status. Accepted by: ❑ Ministerial Act E.A. No. (� (J ❑ Categorical Exemption CASE H( o 96 ❑ Negative Declaration ❑ Other Referenda Case No. rwinorreen�semicaiArs s.r-ez ASL Consulting Engineers To: ,L7�i//9%� �!//9G) 4 P-/SSOC , Date z— /3 - Brri Job No. /3/4L Attention: Title of Project 10/C//9OG (A✓J 2`7` G//'l/ 4P �rOj P c f We are 1 r Enclosing _ !�/��/ �./•✓ pLJMe'CS �7S Requesting J f��p�ius (y!l>p Sending you via / / h7 Z24Gls Returning Remarks: ❑ Corporate Office ❑ 1201 East Warner Avenue ❑ 2045 East Tahquitz-McCallum Way 3280 East Foothill Boulevard, Suite 160 Santa Ana, California 92705-5456 Palm Springs, California 92262-7003 Pasadena, California 911 0 7-319 7 (714)979-1761 (619)320-4220 (818)792-3096• (213)682-2178 CERTIFIED PROPERTY ObadERS' LIST AFFIDAVIT STATE OF CAL IFORIIA ) CCUi9TY OF RIVERSIDE ) CITY OF PALM DESERT ) I, Chicago Title Insurance hereby certify that the attached list contains the names and addresses of all persons to whom all property is assessed as they appear on the latest available assess- ment role of the County within the area described on the attached application and for a distance of three hundred (300) feet from the exterior boundaries of the property described on the attached application. I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. (signed) (date) T. 5S, R. 6E. II , TR.A. OW-OOP a''�l • d Jb 0/0-OV. N//2 WIN JW.. Zo, T. SS., R. ! II INMM.M r1 / JL JJ II >s Jf 7 /I ® MI Y r• 1 J O K K /I N It N� K 0 I.Irr1 J ✓ j I J JIw 4 I f I 10 ZRA V. ® 1 ® 0 ® Drt • © O� i tr 1 it wffll O A � 01 JMAAW J r .I IY /p f. O /bf lO' AV M 4/ M O / 0 O ✓ Ow � ® J Iwr/ JN M tro m l/t l/7 _ rr•I ® ® ®rl ® 0 ® �O, © r r r l.0 pI AM tr/ fi to M .wE r © O Jw AV /// JM J+ im Jf AML- r/M IM r• M S" Adw Yip ar/M O 627-041-015 , 016 & 017 627-042-035 627-101-005 P E Kirkpatrick Ibolya Hideg Sam Montoya Jr P. O. BOX 128 PO BOX 2072 73585 Avenue 44 Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Desert , CA 92260 627-041-032 & 933 &037 627-101-006 627-051-016 Thomas R Cerecedes P E Kirkpatrick Bernard A Rogers 950 Server Avenue PO BOX 128 74163 Parosella Street Los Angeles , CA 90022 Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 Palm Desert , CA 92260 627-101-008 627-041-034 627-051-017 Mr. Jerrl Salyers Mr & Mrs Jack J Gattenio Arnold W Porsch 14009 Cormuta Avenu_ PO BOX 910 PO BOX 742 Bellflower, CA 90706 Frasier Park, CA 93225 Palm Desert, CA 92261 627-041-035 627-101-017 Shawn D Huber Mary E Valdez Mr & Mrs Peter Griffiths 73465 San Nicholas Avenue 73558 Santa Rosa Way 73460 Santa Rosa Way Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Desert , CA 92260 Palm Desert, CA 92260 627-051-018 627-041-036 & 62}042-014 627-101-020 627-051-019 & 037 Benjamin W Bales City of Palm Desert City of Palm Desert 73578 Santa Rosa Way 45275 Prickley Pear Lane 45275 Prickley Pear Lane Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Desert , CA 92260 627-042-016 627-101-021, 022 & 037 627-051-035 William G Spencer Jack P Einstoss Kenneth Elmer Clark 72770 Homestead Road 722 N Calle Rolph 72580 Moonridge Ln Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Springs , CA 92262 Palm Desert, CA 92260 627-101-033 & 039 627-042-017 627-051-036 Carla B Dickerson Domenic J Mungo Hannah R Gordon 79525 Mandevelle Road 8935 Bolsa Avenue 9875idor Drive Indio, CA 92201 Westminster, CA 92683 Los Angeles , CA 90035 627-042-018, 032 & 036 627-101-035 627-101-002 Gordon M. Keenoy City of Palm Sesert William J Maccabe 72080 Palm Haven Drice 45275 Prickley Pear Lane 2716 =Castle Heighs P1 RAncho Mirage, CA 92270 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Los Angeles , CA 90034 627-042-033 627-101-036 627-101-003 Albert Nalick Wilmer K McGregor Stephen B Andrews 347 Peck Drive 5522 Cambria Court 143 Kentucky Ave S E Beverly Hills , CA 90212 San Diego , CA 92120 Washington, D C 20003 627-042-034 627-101-038 627-101-004 Tucker Sattley Land Co Darell Little Vee Ching Shaw 74050 San Marino Circle 73450 San Nicholas Avenue 68450 Alcita Road Palm Deserr, CA 92260 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Cathedral City, CA 92234 627-102-001 627-103-001 627-103-011 Ralph Santopietro Blake Huff Bruce J Reimer . PO BOX 1166 4220 Toluca Lake Lane PO BOX 1087 Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 Burbank, CA 91505 Palm Desert, CA 92260 627-102-002 Leonard F Umatun 627-111-001 & 002 & 003 Thomas A Branick 3636 St Elizabeth Road Robert R Mclachlan 6917 Fountain Avenue Glendale, CA 91206 74075 E1 Paseo Los Angeles , CA 90028 627-103-002 Palm Desert , CA 92260 627-102-003 627-103-003 627-111-004 & 015 Oleta Hardisty FE&M Inc, Employee Profit Carl W Kisner 74451 De Anza Way 918 Thompson Avenue 72300 Rancho Road Palm Desert , CA 92260 Glendale, CA 91201 Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 627-102-006 627-103-004 627-111-006 & 007 Paul F. White Joe Delreal Robert R Mclachlan 77740 Delsware PLace 1457 Bay Point 74075 E1 Paseo Palm Desert, CA 92260 Wilmington, CA 90744 Palm Desert , CA 92260 627-102-007 627-103-005. 627-111-008 Richard K Raymond Duane R Baker Iraj Naimi Akbar 44185 E1 -Cecardo Drive 4111 Crisp Canyon 82231 Highway 111 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Sherman Oaks , CA 91403 Indio, CA 92201 627-102-008 627-103-006 627-111-009 & 010 Joel Bruce Reimer David El C 73655 Santa Rosa-..Way #6 POnBOXn1638orn 44195 es rt, CAO Palm Desert CA 92260 Palm Desert, CA .92260 � Palm Desert, CA 92260 627-102-.009 627-103-007 627-111-011 Lyn De Farms Inc Philip J Hartman Ruthella M Gibbons PO Drawer 1119 6592 Burnham , 10417 Oletha Lane Blythe, CA 92226 Buena Park, CA 90621 Los Angeles , CA 90077 627-103-008 627-102-010 627-111-012 Ronald D Manning Lynn Nielsen Constanine Coty 44170 E1 . Cercado Street 73655 Santa Rosa Way #8 2005 Noya Loace Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palos Verdes Estates , Ea 627-102-011 627-103-009 627-042-015 Naomi H Heale Earl H .Laffoon David L Evans PO BOX .654 73655 Santa Rosa Way #9 73445 Santa Rosa Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Desert, CA 92260 627-162-012 627-103-010 David H Stoltzman Stanley Reimer PO BOX 2096 35120 Maria Road Palm Desert, CA 92260 Cathedral. City, CA 92260" 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CAL19ORNIA 92260 — i TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO(.S): iJIr ri; — PROJECT: APPLICANT: �f3Ue MRA100KIRN � U • Fox 2O6o Suh/ Ui9CLey 833S3 Enclosed Please fir.:, materials describing a proje requested: ct for which the following is being /�yPro✓A� or- /9 Iveq eTioov� l�cc��i�TJoiv o ir/��v�,�pi✓�, ,Perri�9� rVe 40 2 y CC � �,o a c 7-M e ster vo r � egT �✓b�e.r � 5a urh`�*.4sT Go�Gfl e�c o 5ay J'�-v6Lo �y 005� 005. The attached data was m e prepared by the applicant and is being forwarded to you for s interested the probable comments and recommended. conditions of approval. The city i impacts on the environment (including land, air, water, minerals, flora, fauna, noise objects of historical or aesthetic significance) and recommended conditions of approval based on your expertise and area of concern. Your comments a nd recomrr,ehded conditions of approval must be received by this office prior to 5.30 fl.m. _ommi;tee. The Is — , in order to be discussed by the land division id division committee (comprised of director of environmental services, city building official, city engineer, fire marshal and a representative of CVWD) -ill discuss the comments-and recommended conditions of approval and will forward them to the Planning :ornrnission through the staff report. Any information received by this office after ;he receipt deadline: will not be discussed by the land division committee. DIAZ ��C'>s'y.✓��E� o ��✓tee-^.�� ,�!S ECTOP :iERVICES RD!L Attachments CASE NO�� - % Environmental Assessment Form TO THE APPLICANT: Your cooperation in completing this form and supplying the information requested will expedite City review of your application pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. The City is required to make an environmental assessment on all projects which it exercises discretionary approval over. Applications submitted will not be considered complete until all information necessary to make the environmental assessment is complete. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1 . Name, address, and telephone number of owner, applicant or project sponsor: A9AME A1AY400KIA" Zo6 622 s i67 BOY 2060 1>,4 Ho f3 3 353 2. Name, address and telephone number of person to be contacted con- cerning the project (such as architect, engineer, or other repre- sentative) : /2T�q�2/, 73 S5O LESSJ%J40V DR SO/7C-2d A&Z'" 4co 2l0O 3. Common name of project (if any) : 2-4- J/,#VJ A-F4V7-A4ENT 4. Project location (street address or general location) : S.f . Co XL 0 ,- Ste,/ PAat6 i S,4.#,r A X6SA 5. Precise legal description of property (lot and tract number, or meets & bounds) : 'Cn� 4 X S fr4LAv1 - /1 B 2 ?/523 Cu ! >E 2i y.E,�ssDit . 6. Proposed use of the site (project for which the form is filed; describe the total undertaking, not just the current application approval being sought) : 70 peoylD 2 >/tiTs o� rN,r�le 2 C7��c�/ 1EPQ/LTjZfE1�✓lt vViTr/ F/>tc CAJ2 �A/1 &,eC Fog- &&L-s lcl�tf. 7. Relationship to a larger project or series of projects (describe how this project relates to other activities, phases,, and develop- ments planned, or now underway) : 22—fiS &4 EL7`�rV/cam P� ljui/7F cOn.f�[�-r� /N OME f}f®(� 8. List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, to go forward, including those required by the City, Regional , State and Federal agencies (indicate sub- sequent approval agency name, and type of approval required) : ST�,�T /M �'/EWTEylT GfiwO , i/1 ,i7E S-O ChL �s a Cec ��i San/ Pu f3GcG rfE.N774 M4,,tf6 Rtac_ . EXISTING CONDITIONS • 9. Project site area: 666419,4- 5 1-3q pG (Size of property in sq. ft. or acreage) Present zoning: Q • 3 Sp (Proposed zoning) :_ e10ll General Plan land use designation: /Z D 2 Q 12. Existing use of the project site: ygGE ti-T _ 13. Existing use on adjacent properties : (Example - North, Sho South, Single Family Dwellings; East, Vacant, etc. ), pping Center; 9�D2Ti-t —S 2g,�,T iJK Is 126SA - EAST— d/-C,otq-T SOci'9 ti V(JG1�v� Y •AI�SY' — S7P�.E."1� � /� IP/S�LYwtfft�T f-{tOVS 14. Site topography (describe 7 170 Sty ►AIL �CO l�o vLYt=� 15. Are there any natural or manmade drainage channels through or adjacent to the property? NO_K YES 16. Grading (estimate number of cubic yards of dirt being moved) : 17. List the number, size and type of trees being removed: (`0 ter- - 18. Describe any cultural , historic, or scenic aspects of the project site: i 19. Residential Project (if not residential do NOT answer) A. Number and type of dwelling units (Specify no. of bedrooms ) : °L4—y wl$S 2 1S1EO va Z "-M4 B. Schedule of unit sizes : R-P. Lt 44� Ste_ PLA r,4 _ 38 Sf C. Number of stories 0 2 Height e e t. `L 410 �( D. Largest single buildjng (sq. ft. ) (hgt. ) +L.0.0 iy E. Type of household size expected (population projection for the project) : 40 PE%KOcJZ - F. Describe the number and type of recreational facilities : DM F SW MA WAJ(, G� 1>6 0 t_ _ CA S IPA S(t N 1D ECIGS G. Is there any night lighting of the project: C-%&yZ-6E N L-! G+4-rC H. Range of sal pries or rents : $ $ 2 to $ $g00 "'V . I. Percent of total project devoted to: Building . . . . . . . . . . . ,a Paving, including streets. . . . . . . . . . . o Landscaping, Open, Recreation Area . . . . . . 48 - 4 % 20. Commercial , Industrial , Institutional or Other Project: A. Type of use(s) and major function(s) (if offices , specify type & number): B. [lumber of square feet in total building area : C. Number of stories Height feet. D. Largest single building (Sq. Ft. ) (Hgt. ) E. Number of square feet in outdoor storage area: F. Total number of required parking spaces number provided ' G. Hours of operation: H. Maximum number of clients, patrons , shoppers, etc. , at one time: I. Maximum number of employees at one time: J. If patron seating is involved, state the number: K. Is there any night lighting of the project: Yes No L. Percent of total project devoted to: Building . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . % Paving, including streets. . . . . . . . . . Landscaping and Open Space (Recreation). . % Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects : Discuss below all items checked yes (attach additional sheets as necessary) . YES NO 21 . Change in existing features of hillsides , or substantial alteration of ground contours. 22. Change in the dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in the project vicinity. 23. Subject to or resulting in soil errosion by wind or flooding. 24. Change in ground water quality or quantity, or alteration of existing drainage patterns. 25 Change in existing noise or vibration level in the vicinity. Subject to roadway or airport noise (has the required acoustical report been submitted?) 26. Involves the use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives. 27. Involves the use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy. 28. Changes the demand for municipal services (police, fire, sewage, etc. ) 29. Changes the demand for utility services , beyond those presently available or planned in the near future. 30. Significantly affects any unique or natural features, including mature trees. 31 . Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or public land or public roads. 32. Results in the dislocation of people. YES 110 33. Generates controversy based on aesthetics or other features of the project. [ ] Additional explanation of "yes" answers attached. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation, to the best of my ability, and that the facts , statements and information presented are true and correct to the best of my,knowledge and belief. Name Print or Type)— For Signature Date INITIAL STUDY FEE: $30. 00 (Make check payable to the City of Palm Desert and sub— mit with this form. ) 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 March 13, 1986 CiTY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE CASE NO. PP 86-9 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by DAVE MANOOKIAN for approval of a precise plan of design to allow 24 residential units and a negative declaration of environmental impact as it relates thereto, for a 60,570 square foot property in the R-3 zone, located at the southeast corner of San Pablo and Santa Rosa, more particularly described as: APN's 627-102-001 627-102-004 627-102-005 COLLEGE OF THE DESERT " r P -- C n 4' ;: i 3 � FRED WARING ')RIVE tormer v 4 th AYE I F j ) m -a�)-FFrrr .1 - ' IIIII -IN TA R 0 5 A w wAY 111 'e w 3AN TA lO SA i O > — Z o C _ v vi r ") - AS AeENUE — R-F A A L , 14 A r.A Y SUBJECT PROPERTY $, w - CATALINA = o Q J S UA L`ALLIPE AVENUE < w 2 ( ) — ) u _ Z � � w p UP QQ'R-I , N L' ROYAL WR PAL M DRIVE 4 IG�VO -�J �? 0 ' P? 0 0 R-2 (5) •2 (5)'. R•2(5) VR . !R-I R`I l ? R-1 0 - N a� ---_ R C Rk " ' J Z Q = u SAN I GORGONIO w WAY 1 �''VO4 n= er1, -� . ot,- R-3 R-I z �-IVV4 1 SAID public hearing will beheld on Tuesday, April 1 , 1986 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber at the Palm Desert City Hall , 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. If you challenge the proposed actions in court. you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the city council (or planning commission) at, or prior to, the public hearing. PUBLISH: Desert Post RAMON A. DIAZ,, Secretary March 14, 1986 Palm Desert Planning Commission t 1 Ezra"-n. u•>:' C. •_A D cly 14) �� /9 6 73.510 FRED WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 NpZ KNVYs I. .636I 95 '< ,I (CIENT GORES .. ICJ da co ~` as 627-101-004 dp o Uee Ching Shaw �--� rr r—cL c4/ r� � � 36 t c Cathedral City, CA 922 `'V�F 'No ((3/r-cI ;36I'5:1.9Ni (�I)'X.N(:� -Cf) FF()fti41AF:la r I V1 GI Santa RosaCm ....- N — -- coFit w L M■.y a _ CY ,may 4 i -s ''1 e. f ` O I 7 t rash I — 1 3 5 7 1 1 13tl .. ��►�►�rlpu�� co 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 T � drive c-r unit yg ew I 2 S O r= _ , / I w a l k i n �. m �� f o 1. .. .,• __ _ -ri .- i ��' � _ kit ' ri t , I E Cc -o m.bed gorCL rn W living in. h _,. /o ng - ��►--yy t • , ar Ir I � , I r dine , b a h -J (J 15 16 1 dine living bath f 2 , Aedrm # g 1 o _ I r t ( tY kit I z _ d b- e rm # 2 — V I T 17 18 , Patio O ! ' 1 (D b ! f I r f• I 1 i ORYdo `�- - Lm i 1 �)` ff�7 i { i �-a `pat r balcony r , 19 20 unit t p,e A ^ , I i ri 4' � L :_,�, t., � , 2� I wer & upper floor 6 n it _ _ o r l ,S c� FLOOR PLAN unit aF� : -� - •� � it type A F LOOR PLANun r,✓;.. I �.-� t . Y '' t' ► E'.1` `, ,3 -- --- -- -- %' ' �'• i _ . , j scale 1 �a•: , •-o,v 44 sg1t living 1 type B � e 1 Uj �,C--D1 E'-471AL 14�C� 938 sgttiiv ng - CO. ® Lu _� . ,. 21 22 _ , _ , _0 : 1-S PRY kF, a. H IGH 24 i KIN - �� � � �NT� • � L-_ � -- G ,-. .,r UCItt e %AN I- 4 - unft ^�� \ moo.;, I �.. IL ' .. » CH CCN C w.,n L _ I r :Cale drwn by nor approved SITE PLAN BUILDING LEGAL SHEET NO LOTS 1 ,4,&5 OF PALM VILLAGE GARDEN TRACT MB 22/50 P— CO OF RIVERSIOE i _ 10 cl Santa Rosa W N CY C • CD It r-�" F•-F l cd-� `-.�L..iJ tom;� ;�-,�.i._y�,//�. :,...e.,. ?��' ?r�� ;•�: � � � Cri to lop C, w , ~ _ r O • 1 , I •■ii _ z -- N i f t : t ca� '..t: - - -- -- --- - - - - N _ 1 +_—_—F - - • -- — op --r rash LANDSCAPEa. SCHEDULE U � IN�I�)pufcL • vf�PE.S ICU , �- conder�lser units � drive ��P,� �� - rt .. '^ built ' I' BOTANICAL NAME �V! iJ I I t UI COMMON NAME SIZE m cricket proof ' �, ,,,MY: ropf drain 8� r . o. + 20-30 Ft. I (z t PHOENIX dact Ilfera m V `_,+ 'e• S Y DATE PALM — 0 --- `' j F,;' - - _ __ 1 LAGERSTROENIIA indica GRAPE MYRTLE 15 Gal. _� __ enclosed garage _E-- 1 wq- . . -- • �., EUCALYPTUS rudis r l ( DESERT GUM EUCALYPTUS 15 Gal. V cQ y_ J m FRAXINU a corvG •• ' _ ,�. � ,, built proof S undel GREEN EVER ASH r'�-.,� ,;t.,. .-...0 `t. P Y R U S k 15 Gal. • u t , a G awakamli EVERGREEN PEARGal.Gj , s� 15 BRACHYCHITON populneus BOTTLE TREE 15 Gal. m 1.= ` ` . 1. • --- � �' --_ ASHI NGTON robustas milli MEXICAN FAN PALM 10 Trun kO EUCALYPTUS citriodora LEMON-SCFNTFD GUM 1`5 Gaf. MCI V f.,y =: S _r tjbs PHOTINA fraseri o r 5 Gal. >roof drain - ^' �- Hlc;H �_ & r. o . W - THEVETIA peruviana (nerefolia) YE LLOW OLEANDER � C.Cott (�-j,�., I .F Gal. p C r i c k e t NERIUM oleander PINK PETITTE OLEANDER 5 Gal. A ( 1 0 v PITTOSPORUM tobira TOBIRO 5 Gal. v ` '"z — — — --- ,� i _ ,�' .'S•, X YLOSNIA congestum 5 Gal. e F - .44 ; . #' R' _.� CARISSA grandifora BOX WOOD BEAUTIES 1 Gal. 10 m RAPHIOLETIS indica INDIA HOWTHORN 0 built p roof I c' I vines TRA j snr noides f�iUti1 STAR JASMINE 5 Gal, [�] b CD - ^ PYRACANTHA graberri 5 Gal. � - - -- — - - - - - --o BOUGAINVILLA brazilensis BOUGAINVILLA (lavender) 5 Gal. cz I 4 / o lawn HYDROSEED COMMON 0) o BERMUDA = `r # ground covers V e r S GAZANIA 1/2 COPPER KING and � 1/2 h11TSlJb'JA YELLOW 18" Ctrs. o V N � •- w y ® LU c v conden er units — z •- - cricket � CL � U �o - - - - - - - - - - -�'_� ; 1 --- - spa -� o ; »I deck o� V A r_ . '"''°'�-.,,. •�►• .. I pool v, date scale drwn by nor approved LANDSCAPE / ROOF PLAN scale : 1 : 20 '- 0" BUILDING LEGAL LOTS l v4m&5 OF PALM VILLAGE GARDEN TRACT SHEET NO MB 22/50 P - 2 CO OF RIVERSIDE b N N �y • r► h� A plastered finish Inset at glazing ', . overhang location of ty is " glazing o condenser uni !a t , °'` ! „ Cm overhang ,, 6t Co �'-, ` ! 1. iA•�•e...: . J '4 '�„ f r P W e . ° , � ky�i !t � j 4: � 4 P , x•l, :;;."`'- P° ,:@ .* ��'` � • '„�•f \,.lt,, w` ^. 1 r,`' *„' a� r� � - e ' .° r � • m , ,. , � .,gas �, ' ' :•� � .r � .dt�.. ,. ,, � Gil * U ° „ • ,. '.: a art •"� C... 7 4 �, , F, �'.„'+.#. � .R ,..y•: a..., ' .. .;':^r,n 1 � 'i,� y+1@1�, .,ye •:7w'•: ,,, 'fir• ,�"..,;�. 4` •..' ,f ;s,.. x. , /'^.::.9:... ...,. .,.: Sa. -' � � 1 ;.:. �ii -`:wc• 'f' 1. *s 1 '\ yN, '`sp4 E• .r a. N I front entry i m north elevation east elevation � �I UNIT TYRE A 6 UNIT 1 STORY I� L r U 0 V � C r b l 1 f • r! T O ' e' a� C� `� T.1 zi A., • Y. t lr ,,' " '` � � �� ..., �, f, ;lf.�." `S ,�r v�, a. 1 I . 4 } i . V W west elevation south elevation � x � Qw � J V 0 Z v --- - -- glazing Inset at glazing ' plas ed finish frontAl r y or . i 4 a1I at bedrmglazing pr �;.,v► 'dam • ` \4�-° t 4 ,# ,� . ' v �; r i • r. • a r a r . �a.r S• 1 do to I north elevation south elevation east elevation west elevation scale UNIT TYPE A 4 UNIT 1 STORY drwn by approved BUILDING r. R .. y . r G. r J _ r Oil' ,9 ISHEET NOw. / i l x .,'.< .1 .): I 1 I I I •1' ` .f .$• f. ..• . .u. ,, ...ti.'L ire.- . .. s 4 P - 3 left side elevation front elevation right side elevation rear elevation ARA GGE N [� N • m M Fy • .► • r m v O • 0 m N v� N CD �/ aD 43 E LT W a Cd r I 4 k i i } ,y" U i � I 1 • i r ! ,t q K F _ 0 r W z O south elevation w east elevation UNIT 2 STURYto UNIT TYPE " B " 14 V j LU x 0 Uj =� -7A d , U f i r : : nrk , b w .k t � a _ I I �., - � ;i;: . !, `� .,. 'tic - c __ ::r.�- _ y h " Z is 41 If west elevation north elevation date scale drwn by approved BUILDING SHEET No P - 4 n N � c Sanl-a—Rosa 4 w N - EXIT , i -- —'o r;�O J p . _ N� O 3'-C- I � ,,w".�41G 4 MF KA--L.� s!N W rn �-�' t-{ic-+4 d5L uM P • AL Of _ u� •E� y „ M • 01 , - ,V 0 0 .. 1 , Co --11, `. b,h�, - _ - ., `� ht,Utz' P f✓ i,., � 1 1 � .. 2 . 4 Ca 2 10 0 . . Am To !:5 �rA 9 P 0 N7 S Z ENO 2 unit B ,direrS RY _ _ - ._ r — ._ w a 1 111 J T1 - m O M•rr in.bod IL WAS 0 — �8 B Q AREA - •ti O - - 1 If -- r i t (__ - ? O ! R QQ �f 1 s5 O J ± eo- H satA I i i► it ,. V REAT10N r4kREA CONIC. r 1. , W•' 1 b* drm fCWA Z72 0 � T (IccX i &) Ii t b`•d r- . ® patio o 40 A c — 1 _ balcony 4 4�A� �4b0.Df�N 3t20 _ • FLOOR Idwer upper• R - s•--- PLAID unit t e *A" FLOOR PLAN unit, type 'OBL" % -Jn - i ,'.`4 $Oslo 1 /8•: V-0 844 sgft tfvl"g ; dtl• aettl�rlA� _} - ! - ��� P,nCE'4rIAL 147t)DCo I 8 CARPCR7K) 1 Wit: , � ��'�.1 �'►c�J�-i�J� 1 1�� i `�`3 . :�•r � _�-- __-_ � r � �,� r T 2 2 t , 0 FE CL 2 , 1--s ORS 0 r. •. . girl cor+c .,io. x x .2 24 •..rs i _- it It *A' , 1 24 �..� cam. Q �! c..A.R�,�T . 0 o 0 Cm eV rilcH CONC T- 24 J �.✓ ; �� � ,ES 1 �, .,, T FE1'� A�.r I�E�r ^ l , 1 (/ / d i a T f -•' drwscale n by G approved no r . SITE PLAN BUILDING • a i` i LEGAL SHEET NO LOTS 1 ,4#&15 OF PALM VILLAGE GARDEN TRAC-r CMG 22/50 � • � i 100 OF RIVER'S.IDE G I < in M: b cl Santa Rosa --- --- a ---------------- •r N l^J F�•C• Imo! , _-----_� \, 3 " �-��q { st t�M(a .K... LD Wvl. _ 'moo t R �"� c�v I r=�N ` O .. t4 ?j-�o• {-�t GN 'SLUM P R LK_ L�-.- ~ M■,1 AL Z .t fi • - v i 1 1`f 0.. -cc �s ' Ca { r2 C►RP0 . . r _. o r wal— — I I t d f n: k#t I an.bo i t•�• r — — — — — — -, Ina wAL� I� - - - - -- ! --- -- ~ f is Q A 1k. Q AREA i '146 --- - � . - r� :. �, y - i� CA R Pry R7z3 _ , ,...,, _ _ #� - �- ►� _ � , , :� ATIC��J AREA Cv,.1GsL -+ r b od r a OR '- 2�2.0 I — i 'entry kit s I , 1 I — 'T 1 — — _ pat 1 o �I a A ' 1�1 1 -s C " T W 10 10 pL A A 2.E)TC'��-1 �4� � -*' � �� � � � I i i r bate on y _1 i 4��DR. 3 FT _ - ---1 � I � Q � unj f a •, ' ~ -4 lower & upper f l �.0 2a FLOOR PLAN unit type A FLOOR PLANunit a : Y -o 1144 : t r t vtng as$ .4tt"V1019 seats � /a' • q t F�3CENrIAL 14�Ck -- — I 8 CAR pb R� { � � Uj JC7 EAT 21 22 j Cl t V 1-S ORY 2 2C -- ,45 30 Ci�1 ' Ht�f-t � I C = `12 ��T � I � � - c ..io.`�... ,.. corn ,zi * � �- �...�.�; unit ty tr _ y -- AZ "t 0, 10 A`( moo` r41GH CONC w.oL 75 d 1 A scale drwin by r _ approved { SITE PLAN � t � - C 1 = 2v --o �� B J uIL�Na LEGALt � SHEEN' W LOTS 9o4s&5 OF PALM VILLAGE DARDEN TRAC%r MIME 22/s0 e �O OF AIVEA�E.ICI�. q�g I n I cl San-ta Rosa N EXI G Co K.,w�•L� �o 5CR N l�l R• I ;_----T \ 3 - 14 t GW SLUM N : F= N ` O � .MCA � • .r Ct 1 q�1 - ------- - -- -- - - _ ✓ i N C q � . Ca f � ` 10 2 1 , b. , R .► .I �. l.. s.. POD \ ` _. __. uni �,zTt - - - _ Y ,... OR I — i wait to in - E B O 4 it A �" O AREA SKI Co 0 1 11 • to_ HIGH "' o R E A Comi - - _ iirAE #k # i r , Ac V � t v kit » Patio A • allo 1 —s 0 a fee A 1 �FC�� 1 �4 � F�" .s, - _ e or, balcony 20 -- 'A' un t aer upper if 1avr �----. -� 77�, ,,�:✓, .; �, Rio 24 ►� o �. T- e, w AFL� JR PLAN unit ty;) 'FLOOR PLAN unit type (, ►4 1 ia•: t •-0' e44 salt llving �e��QEN T'I A 1. 30� � � 8 cAR - .� 1� P� � t W : 41 19 I 22 �a• � C�P� 11C- R �A�I N 2Q24, 48!4 ,. r� - ► 14 1 S ORY C _� RFLKI�A�"I N AREA-�) 272C t 451 — ` z2 o Jc,PF I Z 94. { 24 - �e• 0 C1 ©{ ..fit -- 0 61 C L ' G..., 1 � V I �� I �� / fir^ '1 Lw�/ �'� t —y' �.� -�1 h,� � 1 � ��� �,'v � 1 \��I 1✓1^_ION � � F � � .. 1986 scale drwn by nor approved SITE PLAN--- O a J BUILDING ' A LEGAL SHEET 1 I.OTs 1 ,4s&5 OF PALM VILLAGE DARDEN TRAC`r TIMID tin/so 1CO OF n1vEst!_lon- - 4 :k L 4h \ Y ' ♦ 1 _ \ k fix.. A} I , h , 40 .. 1. .... .___-',__"— .•_! V" r • ,? f �3or'T�-.E TIE To = LYf�T'�� E' x cam. T - 6. T. _ _ I � F F-c.:�)M 24'I { ., - �-'x T.c 15 G—�► . (SEE �'LA► .i _ .,,,_.- �„' .. T� N V1 � i r L-� -_ , k= Z fr; .e�T� III 1 r C , p. - � LANDSCAPE $ CNEDULE t SIZE_. pF ME COMMON NAME 15 t ���� � ../'�'�. .r _'�� fees � '�_. �'�� �i0 t Ga W K — __- _ ! B .J.. cE� T� yp- f.4 �1,7 e ';7 • �-_ _ v 3 FtCUS retusa INDIAN LURAL 15 Gat,/?..F�(30X " wt L...__� • ,' ' r - I 104 PY - 11' Bp pc� 1 "� / pc-. TJ - n� PJjr KAt�11t Evt- I �I JsG -/lkgox . � _ - - _ -� — — - - - - %- -- ! fk cr I . _ - { a `� , , pD F p •. 'd , J r s �jI - 4 p :.AL ,J 4 14 r 2 a, , 4+f , a i , I - 1 _._._ L i /j fraseri1,. - P . __ _ _� _ / �' 1M TI 5 Gal. / � P� k Q r ` �✓ Y , �. T_. T I- . t O� r^� -1"'f- , R, mot.: /( 17 ,. � PH NA t: _ l,_. \ �r'—!�_ r r - 1 -'^ _ .cyC-�.'' ; ` 'TrL.I_._. • '..�—T—'. h X _ _ •7� - , '_ _�"1' .�. - NERIUM oleander (nerefolia) PINK PETITTC OLEANDER 5 Gai , y �' /} t , ___ ------- ~' r '"� pJ Fit✓- 5 Gal.Jobira TOBIRO ' 1 J �-- , „- - a - X YLOSMA congestum ` �JC l. Tom^ f3P '► �O { I R IOLETIS tndtca INDIAN HAWTHORN5 4 f 1 • - _ +r1 Vne ; TRACHELOSPERMUf�1 STAR JASMINE 5 Gal. Jasminoides 0 �� y _ 4 w; r-- _ -- ..y T.-Ni.�: '?-{: r f� t ��! C.-A•�...� �,, i - PYRACANTH I A rat erri 5 Gal. .: t j r r ,, FP BOUGAINVILLA brazilensis SOUGAINVILLA (lavender) 5 Gal. i ►'i 4. \ r 4 C �' I -'--- - -_- ,`,F . IMinj HYDROSEED COMMON s , ( t ._ +0 FBERMUDA LiS . _ i r _ IA n y• 7 GAZAN a 1 l2 COPPER PF'E R KING d LA l.)`,.:�.-�; �I��" FR � - - � h---- -_ - _. _ `; � � 1/2 MITSUWA YELLOW 18" CntrsL. WIN y i 8 y .r V. I r g pi*rl�os 24 9-ox date s - I {�J J SVr < --� �• --- - — -- 8 t ., rwn 74 jk _ - t _ tz aPProvecfQL. � BUILDING, 1 F IF _ Y d b #(LCH. GptMuK. ,,a.P��,OVFD �tAiJ lo�23�a ML I` SHE E T NO L7 �, o��rJl NEVI S-23 87 r( 5-29-37 CM,UTY 1 91) 15 t�Kn p' 'i1 ci Santa Rosa 4 imL Ljl_l p ftpt,.Kl W/..t..t • , • r , " ,� ; ► o I ' r w I } t/ . p r , - r V „ i : � r,' „ '.... ..,.fit:•. Mr� V - - , ry w w ,r , F7�, , , M� r y, f ti w^ / r,A . . r r �i • Rh , , sdx .I ,�►a��o l , ` I � , r ; r... , , wal 2, AM CON r 10 PL I� f� 2.E O M 4 � FT :................ ,.. 20 , _ - • �, - U we A, /n r PLAN! Wilt' ' .:,- .,, n,'., v',., '.' , LOO ,'FLOO , r �: . � : , "Po 1 scats i/S', 1 '-0`. 844 sgtt IIving A, 41 l»b► 11" .~� � + INN 2 2 - ' '4 w 1�.5 Chi �✓ t)17� CoG'�+ 'TC t ., o-HIG�t r , , I ��A k "2j ."21 �,4 4 z� . ► ! 1 r a r. , a i 1 , u , fo r 75 PER1 1 I -�- r, .. I, 1 ' e C' A: Y• , 1 _ „ norSITE PLAN d , s , so IL I .. „ I L& L , a r �•it «"1 � ►11I► �!� P A`L M si Mt, I �'1�t.A C" " ^ a 0 r x�a « r ,w„ rap ©P RIV6R8106 II ,I