Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPP 86-12 SENIOR HOUSING/CATALINA WAY 1986 PREfl ISE PLAN TENTATIVE TRACT ZONE CHANGE PARCEL MAP�?��t—�' 3 VARIANCE co t : REFER TO:.- APPLICANT: LOCAT ION : - REQUE=ST:_ —_ EXISTING ZONE:— PREPARATION PROGRESS DATE BY COMMENTS APPLICATION RECEIVED LEGAL. PUBLICATION SENT NOTICES SENT FIELD INVESTIGATION DEPTS.. NOTIFIED BUILDING; ENGINEERING FIRE_ POLICE RECREATION & PARKS SCHOOL DISTRICT T DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS FLOOD CONTROL PRELIMINARY MEETING _ a STAFF REPORT FINAL PLAN APPROVAL PRECI:3E PLAN (6) LANDSCAPING PLAN (5) PLAN. DIRECTOR MOD16) HEARINGS & ACTIONS DATE ACTION VOTE REVIEW BOARD HEARING PC. HEARING PUBLISHED P.C:. PUBLIC HEARING APPLICANT NOTIFIED C.C. PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE NO. RESOLUTION NO. . EFFECTIVE DATE RECORDED FOR DATA- BANK ZONING MAP CORRECTED i a `J MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION AUGUST 5, 1986 V1 . CONSENT CALENDAR A. Case No. PMW 6 8)- L & T DEVELOPMENT, Applicant Request for approval of a parcel map waiver consolidating three lots into one for development of a senior apartment project. B. Case No. PMW 86-18 - DICK GLOVER, Applicant Request for approval of a parcel map waiver to consolidate two lots into one. Action• Moved by Commissioner Downs, seconded by Commissioner Wood, approving the consent calendar by minute motion. Carried 5-0 VII. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Case No. CUP 86-3 - LIVING DESERT RESERVE, Applicant Request for approval of a 6500 sq . ft . educational building within a public institution zone on the east side of Portola south of Haystack. Mr. Joy indicated that the architectural commission had granted preliminary approval of the plans and that staff was recommending approval of the conditional use permit. Chairman Crites opened the public hearing and asked the applicant to address the commission. MR. JOHN OUTCAULT, architect. 74-133 El Paseo, explained that he had reviewed the staff report and had no objection to the conditions of approval . He indicated that the building would be an addition to the existing buildings and that it would enhance to appearance of the site. Chairman Crites asked if anyone wished to speak in FAVOR or OPPOSITION to the proposed project. Hearing no one the public hearing was closed. 2 } CITY OF PALM DESERT DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT TO: PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: AUGUST 5, 1986 CASE NO: PMW 86-8 REQUEST: Approval of a parcel map waiver to consolidate three lots into one for development of a senior apartment project. APPLICANT: L & T DEVELOPMENT 74-133 El Paseo, Suite R Palm Desert, CA 92260 1. BACKGROUND: A. DESCRIPTION OF SITE: The property is located in the R-2 S.O. zone at the southwest corner of Catalina Way and San Carlos Avenue. 11. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A. GENERAL: The applicant wishes to consolidate three lots to provide sufficient area for siting of 20 units of senior apartments. This type of project is consistent with the Senior Overlay zoning. Project has previously been approved as PP 86-12. III. RECOMMENDATION: Staff feels this request is acceptable and recommends approval by minute motion. A. Proper permits and approvals to be obtained prior to any construction. IV. ATTACHMENTS• A. Application. Prepared by Reviewed and Approved by CS/tm r ORDINANCE NO. 463 A ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT RELATING TO LOWER INCOME RENTAL CONTROL FOR A 20 UNIT SENIOR CITIZEN APARTMENT PROJECT LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF CATALINA WAY AND SAN CARLOS AVENUE. CASE NO. DA 86-2 WHEREAS. the City Council of the City of Palm Desert. California. did on the 24th day of April . 1986, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider the request of L 8 T DEVELOPMENT CO. for approval of a development agreement relating to the affordable housina requirements for a 20 unit conventional senior housing project on the southwest corner of Catalina Way and San Carlos Avenue. WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard. said city council did find the following facts and reasons to exist to justify their actions: 1 . The proposed development agreement satisfies the intent and purpose of the Senior Housina Overlay and the General Plan Housing Element. 2. The development furthers the general welfare by requiring the construction of needed senior housing affordable by low and moderate income senior citizen households. NOW. THEREFORE. BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of Palm Desert. California, as follows: 1 . That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the commission in this case: 2. That DA 86-2 Exhibit "A" is hereby approved. 3. The City Clerk of the it,, of Palm Desert. California. is hereby directed to oubli .h — is ordinance in the Palm Desert Post, a newspaper of genera ! r nlarion. published and circulated in the City of Palm Desert . -s1irornia, and shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days .3�rer its adoption. ORDINANCE NO. 463 PASSED. APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert City Council . held on this 8th day of May. 1986, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: BENSON, SNYDER, WILSON & KELLY NOES: NONE ABSENT: JACKSON ABSTAIN: NONE9,f-,er i ; / G( RICHA KELLY, a or ATTEST: SHEILA R. GILD AN. City Clef City of Palm Desert. Calif nia /dig 2 ORDINANCE NO. 463 Is obtained from HUD. If in the future, more relevant data is made available specifically applicable to senior citizens by (HUD) or other officially recognized agencies, such data shall become the basis of this agreement. Agreement 1 . DEVELOPER has been conditionally granted permission by the CITY to construct 20 rental conventional senior housing units on the PROPERTY by Precise Plan/Conditional Use Permit 86-12 Planning Commission Resolution No. As a condition of said approval DEVELOPER hereby agrees to reserve and make affordable four studio units for lower Income senior citizen households. 2. Monthly rents for the AFFORDABLE SENIOR UNITS shall not exceed 30% of the maximum gross monthly income as shown for lower income households in Exhibit "2". 3. The DEVELOPER or his assigned management agent shall be responsible for determining eligibility of prospective tenants. Prior to opening the project the DEVELOPER shall submit for approval a plan to the CITY describing the procedure for determining and enforcing eligibility requirements. This plan shall include annual qualification by all eligible households and a annual audit at the DEVELOPERS'S cost by the 5 ORDINANCE NO. 463 CITY or Its assigned agents determining compliance with all aspects of this agreement. 4. The DEVELOPER shall not discriminate on the basis of race, creed, sex or national origin. 5. The provisions of this agreement shall run with, burden and bind the DEVELOPER and his successors. The prowislons hereof shall be enforceable by appropriate legal action brought by the CITY. In the event legal action is brought to enforce any provision hereof, the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorney's fees together with other legally allowable costs. 6. This agreement shall be reviewed by the CITY planning commission every 6 months, at which time the applicant or his successor shall be required to demonstrate good faith compliance with the terms of the agreement. If as a result of this review, the commission finds and determines, on the basis of substantial evidence, that the applicant has not complied in good faith with terms or conditions of the agreement, It shall recommend to the city council that the agreement be modified or terminated. If the city council concurs with the planning commission recommendation the agreement shall be modified or terminated. Proceeding before the city council shall be a noticed public hearing. If at the time of the hearings substantial Improvements have not yet occurred on the site, termination 6 ORDINANCE NO. 463 IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have executed this Agreement the year and date first above written. THE CITY OF PALM DESERT By, J By L a T DEVELOPMENT CO. (Notarized) By ATTEST: SHEILA R. GIL!LIGAN, Cl, ,0 Clerk City of Palm Desert, 'Callfornla c STATE OF CALIFORNIA n COUNTYOF Iss G on - ��"� �� .brtore -.the undersigned a Notary Funnc in and for O _ m said State,personally appeared t �'' i c - a iI personally known to me(or proved tome on the basis of sans o, factory evidence)to be the persons)whose names)is/are suit .9 scribed to the within Instrument and acknowledged to me that - a he/she/they executed the same. iY ro WITNESS my hand and official seal. i y Signature (This area for official notarial seaq ORDINANCE NO. 463 of the AGREEMENT will also involve revocation of all previous approvals and permits associated herewith. if substantial improvements are already In place and modifications acceptable to the CITY cannot be negotiated then enforcement of provisions of this agreement shall be pursued through legal action per No. 5 of this AGREEMENT. 7. The AGREEMENT shall be construed according to the laws of the State of California. If any portion of the AGREEMENT is for any reasons held to be unenforceable, such determination shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions. 8. Each of the parties hereto covenants and agrees that it has the legal capacity to make the AGREEMENTS herein contained, that each AGREEMENT Is binding upon that party and that this AGREEMENT is executed by a duly authorized official acting In his official capacity. 9. The terms of this agreement shall remain in force as long as the PROJECT remains in existence. 7 n ORDINANCE NO. 463 EXHIBIT Of" Legal Description Parcel 1 The east 112 of Lot 24 Palma Village Groves per map book 20 Page 51 Riverside County. Parcel 2 & 3 The portion of Lot 24 of Palma Village Groves per map book 20 Page 51 , Riverside County. 9 t ORDINANCE ND. 463 EXHIBIT "2" AFFORDABLE HOUSING INCOME AND RENT SCHEDULE - 1986 Income Rent Lower - $15,000 Lower - $375 10 ORDINANCE NO. 463 " EXHIBIT •A• L 11 T DEVELOPMENT COMPANY AFFORDABLE SENIOR HOUSING DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT This agreement, made as of this 25th day of March , 1988 between the City of Palm Desert, a California municipal corporation (hereinafter "CITY") and L S T Development Co. , (hereinafter "DEVELOPER") provides: Recitals 1 . DEVELOPER is owner of certain real property located within the City of Palm Desert, California. which property is described in Exhibit 1, attached hereto and made a part hereof (hereinafter "PROPERTY") . DEVELOPER has applied for and been granted approval of a precise plan/conditional use permit (PP/CUP 86- 12) to construct 20 conventional senior housing units on the PROPERTY. 2. As a condition of said approval , CITY and DEVELOPER have agreed that 20% of units associated with the project be set aside for lower Income occupants subject to restrictions necessary to insure the continued occupancy of Bald units by lower Income senior citizen households. These units shall hereafter be referred to as "AFFORDABLE SENIOR UNITS." 3 1 ORDINANCE NO. 463 3. DEVELOPER and CITY desire to further memorialize and implement the conditions of said approval and do hereby agree to the following terms and conditions. 4. As used herein, the following terms shall be defined as: A. SENIOR CITIZEN HOUSEHOLD - Maximum two person household of which one member is 62 years of age or older. B. CONVENTIONAL SENIOR HOUSING - Rental or ownership units designed and restricted to healthy ambulatory senior citizens who remain capable of performing most activities associated with Independent daily life. Other than having smaller units and possessing design features and recreational amenities more compatible with a less active lifestyle conventional senior housing resembles standard housing. C. LOWER INCOME SENIOR CITIZEN HOUSEHOLD - Senior Citizen Households whose gross income does not exceed 80% of the median Income for a one person household for Riverside County based upon financial and demographic data received from the United States Department of Housing and Community Development (HUD) or its successor agency. This information is included in Exhibit '12" and shall be up dated automatically as current data 4 F Z S-VNtt was prepared from P�jcAff'-ata only and does sent a survey of erty shown hereon.has been approved upon the expressed condition that building permits shall not be issued for any develop - SCALE I"= 50' ment within this adjustment plat until necessary dedica- tions if any have occurred . 0' 25' 50' 100' 150, 200' CATALI NA _ WAY a N.89044'00"E. 218. 58' a R W 30' w O Q • co i 0) `� 31 �g to - b N a �, O o N o v O Z ILI P v��0 to z QP °O of O z , 3 P L 30' o N.890 44'00"E. 118.00' m 3 0 O O in p O Z to 00 O O Z PL _ 100.58' _ N.890 44'00"E 627- 113 -08 627- 113-09 PORTION 24 CATALINA WAY & SAN CARLOS AVE. 627- 1 13- 10 Lot No.s Street name A.P. No.s AD - -TMENT PLAT- CITY OF PALM DESERT Pre (dr6d_ ter~: ��� Applicant: Approved by JA-m S?D. FEIRO � L.S. L & T DEVELOPMENT 7 Ig({ ► WXC1)K17A i 74- 133 EL PASEO DIRECTOR OF(PUBLIC WORKS PAN. DESERT, CA. 9 Fj SUITE K RCE NO. 25320 (619 3 1 ice@ PALM DESERT , CA. 92260 7-3 1'6 CE 414�i ` DATE P M W 8 6 — 8 DATE 4 i LEGAL DESCRIPTION A PORTION OF THE EAST HALF OF LOT 24 OF PALMA VILLAGE GROVES AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOR 20 PAGE 51 OF MAPS , IN THE OFFICE OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY RECORDER, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING WHICH IS THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 24; - THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT, 218. 58 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY AND PARALLEL WITH THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT, 281.15 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT, 100.58 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY AND PARALLEL WITH THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT, 85.15 FEET TO A POINT WHICH IS 196.00 FEET FROM THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT AND 118. 00 FEET FROM THE EAST LINE OF SAID . LOT; THENCE EASTERLY AND PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT, 118.00 FEET, TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG TIME EAST LINE OF SAID LOT, 196.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. CITY OF PALM DESERT TRANSMITTAL LETTER I. TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council I1 . REQUEST: Approval of Development Agreement specifying terms for lower income rent controls for 20% of a 20 unit senior housing project to be located at the southwest corner of Catalina Way and San Carlos. III.- APPLICANT: L 8 T DEVELOPMENT 74-133 E1 Paseo, Suite 9 Palm Desert, CA 92260 IV. CASE NO: DA 86-2 V. _ DATE: April 24, 1986 VI. CONTENTS: A. Staff Recommendation B. Discussion C. Draft Ordinance D. Planning Commission Minutes involving Case No. PP/CUP 86-12, DA 66-2 E. Planning Commission Resolution No. 1133 F. Planning Commission Staff Report dated April 1 , 1986. G. Related maps and/or exhibits --------------------------------------------------------------------------- A. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Waive further reading and pass to second reading. 0. DISCUSSION: On April 1 . 1986, the planning commission approved a precise plan for a 20 unit senior housing project on 1,8 acres at the southwest corner of Catalina Way and San Carlos Avenue. Presently six older rental units and one single family home exist on the property. The home and five of the rental units will be completely remodeled, one unit will be demolished and 14 additional units will be constructed under the age 62 minimum provisions of the senior overlay. The senior overlay requires that 10% of the project be reserved and made affordable by lower income households and 10% by median moderate income households. The applicant has agreed to forgo the moderate income units and provide all 20% (4 units) at the lower income rate. Four large 631 square foot studios would be controlled. Under the existing schedule J STAFF REPORT DA 86-2 maximum rents would be $375/month with a maximum income of $15,000/year. The terms of the controls are described in the development agreement and are similar to those of past projects. Prepared by Reviewed and Approved by /dig 2 .I MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION APRIL 1 , 1986 Action: Moved by Commissioner Downs, seconded by Commissioner Wood, adopting the findings as presented by staff. Carried 5-0. Moved by Commissioner Downs, seconded by Commissioner Wood, adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 1131 , approving PP 86-10, subject to conditions. Carried 5-0. E. Case Nos. PP 86-12, CUB and DA 86-2 - L 8 T DEVELOPMENT, Applicant Request for approval of a negative declaration of environmental impact , precise plan , conditional use permit, and development agreement for a 20 unit senior citizen apartment project on 1 .8 acres within the R-2 senior overlay zone at the southwest corner of Catalina Way and San Carlos Avenue. Mr. Drell outlined the salient points of the staff report and recommended approval . Chairman Crites opened the public testimony and asked if the applicant wished to address the commission. MR. FRANZ TIRRE, applicant, stated that he has a remodel program that should increase the attractiveness of the neighborhood and discussed the development agreement requirements. Chairman Crites asked if anyone present wished to speak in FAVOR or OPPOSITION to the proposed. MR. DAN HOYER spoke in favor of the project and asked for and received clarification regarding minimum age and possible conversion to something other than senior housing. Mr. Drell indicated that it would require an amendment to the conditional use permit and stated that the project would have to be physically changed. Chairman Crites closed the public testimony. 9 i I 1 r l� MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION APRIL 1, 1986 Commissioner Richards indicated that this project complied with what had. been envisioned for this area. Action: Moved by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner Erwood, adopting the findings as presented by staff. Carried 5-0. Moved by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner Erwood, adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 1132, approving PP 86-12 and CUP 86-12, subject to conditions. Carried 5-0. Moved by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner Erwood, adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 1133, recommending approval of DA 86-2 to city council . Carried 5-0. F. Case Nos. GPA 86-1, C/Z 86-2 and PP 86-7 - G.K. RANNEY, INC. AND PALM DESERT GARDENS, Applicants Request for approval of a general plan amendment from medium density residential (5-7 du/ac) , date palm preserve to high .density residential (7- 18 du/ac) , a zone change from open space, natural factors overlay to R-3 (3) (3,000 square foot land area per du) , and a precise plan to allow construction of 468 two story residential units on 39 acres located at the northeast corner of Fred Waring Drive and Deep Canyon Road. j Mr. Joy outlined the salient i points of the staff report and the reasons for the recommendation of denial , noting that only one-eighth of the surrounding property would be compatible with two story development and that the city d i d not need more rental housing in the city at the present time. It was suggested that a motion for denial be made. After discussion, the attorney recommended that the commission listen to the presentation from the applicant. Chairman Crites opened the public testimony and asked the applicant to address the commission. i MR. ROBERT RICCIARDI , 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane, explained why he was asking for this project and outlined why it would be suitable for the area. He also gave a slide presentation 10 ORDINANCE NO. A ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT RELATING TO LOWER INCOME RENTAL CONTROL FOR A 20 UNIT SENIOR CITIZEN APARTMENT PROJECT LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF CATALINA WAY ,,AND SAN CARLOS AVENUE. CASE NO. DA 86-2 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 24th day of April , 1986, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider the request of L & T DEVELOPMENT CO. for approval of a development agreement relating to the affordable housing requirements for a 20 unit conventional senior housing project on the southwest corner of Catalina Way and San Carlos Avenue. WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said' city council did find the following facts and reasons to exist to justify their actions: 1 . The proposed development agreement satisfies the intent and purpose of the Senior Housing Overlay and the General Plan Housing Element. 2. The development furthers the general welfare by requiring the construction of needed senior housing affordable by low and moderate income senior citizen households. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1 . That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the commission in this case: 2. That DA 86-2 Exhibit "A" is hereby approved. 3. The City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert, California, is hereby directed to publish this ordinance in the Palm Desert Post, a newspaper of general circulation, published and circulated in the City of. Palm Desert, California, and shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its adoption. ORDINANCE NO. _ PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert City Council , held on this day of 1986, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RICHARD KELLY, Mayor ATTEST: SHEILA R. GILLIGAN, City Clerk City of Palm Desert, California /dlg 2 ORDINANCE NO. _ EXHIBIT "A" L S T DEVELOPMENT COMPANY AFFORDABLE SENIOR HOUSING DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT This agreement, made as of this _ day of , 1986 between the City of Palm Desert, a California municipal corporation (hereinafter "CITY") and L S T Development Co. , (hereinafter "DEVELOPER") provides: Recitals 1 . DEVELOPER is owner of certain real property located within the City of Palm Desert, California, which property is described in Exhibit 1 , attached hereto and made a part hereof (hereinafter "PROPERTY") . DEVELOPER has applied for and been granted approval of a precise plan/conditional use permit (PP/CUP 86- 12) to construct 20 conventional senior housing units on the PROPERTY. 2. As a condition of said approval , CITY and DEVELOPER have agreed that P0% of units associated with the project be set aside for lower income occupants subject to restrictions necessary to insure the continued occupancy of said units by lower income senior citizen households. These units shall hereafter be referred to as "AFFORDABLE SENIOR UNITS." 3 ORDINANCE NO. _ 3. DEVELOPER and CITY desire to further memorialize and implement the .conditions of said approval and do hereby agree to the following terms and conditions. 4. As used herein, the following terms shall be defined as: A. SENIOR CITIZEN HOUSEHOLD - Maximum two person household of which one member is 62 years of age or older. B. CONVENTIONAL SENIOR HOUSING - Rental or ownership units designed and restricted to healthy ambulatory senior citizens who remain capable of performing most activities associated with independent daily life. Other than having smaller units and possessing design features and recreational amenities more compatible with a less active lifestyle conventional senior housing resembles standard housing. C. LOWER INCOME SENIOR CITIZEN HOUSEHOLD - Senior Citizen Households whose gross income does not exceed 80% of the median income for a one person household for Riverside County based upon financial and demographic data received from the United States Department of Housing and Community Development (HUD) or its successor agency. This information is included in Exhibit 112" and shall be up dated automatically as current data 4 ORDINANCE NO. is obtained from HUD. If in the future, more relevant data is made available specifically applicable to senior citizens by (HUD) or other officially recognized agencies, such data shall become the basis of this agreement. Agreement 1 . DEVELOPER has been conditionally granted permission by the CITY to construct 20 rental conventional senior housing units on the PROPERTY by Precise Plan/Conditional Use Permit 86-12 Planning Commission Resolution No. As a condition of said approval DEVELOPER hereby agrees to reserve and make affordable four studio units for lower income senior citizen households. 2. Monthly rents for the AFFORDABLE SENIOR UNITS shall not exceed 30% of the maximum gross monthly income as shown for lower income households in Exhibit "2". 3. The DEVELOPER or his assigned management agent shall be responsible for determining eligibility of prospective tenants. Prior to opening the project the DEVELOPER shall submit for approval a plan to the CITY describing the procedure for determining and enforcing eligibility requirements. This plan shall include annual qualification by all eligible households and a annual audit at the DEVELOPERS'S cost by the 5 ORDINANCE NO. CITY or its assigned agents determining compliance with all aspects of this agreement. 4. The DEVELOPER shall not discriminate on the basis of race, creed, sex or national origin. 5. The provisions of this agreement shall run with, burden and bind the DEVELOPER and his successors. The provisions hereof shall be enforceable by appropriate legal action brought by the CITY. In the event legal action is brought to enforce any provision hereof, the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorney's fees together with other legally allowable costs. 6. This agreement shall be reviewed by the CITY planning commission every 6 months, at which time the applicant or his successor shall be required to demonstrate good faith compliance with the terms of the agreement. If as a result of this review, the commission finds and determines, on the basis of substantial evidence, that the applicant has not complied in good faith with terms or conditions of the agreement, it shall recommend to the city council that the agreement be modified or terminated. If the city council concurs with the planning commission recommendation the agreement shall be modified or terminated. Proceeding before the city council shall be a noticed public hearing. If at the time of the hearings substantial improvements have not yet occurred on the site, termination 6 ORDINANCE NO. of the AGREEMENT will also involve revocation of all previous approvals and permits associated herewith. If substantial improvements are already in place and modifications acceptable to the CITY cannot be negotiated then enforcement of provisions of this agreement shall be pursued through legal action per. No. 5 of this AGREEMENT. 7. The AGREEMENT shall be construed according to the laws of the State of California. If any portion of the AGREEMENT is for any reasons held to be unenforceable, such determination shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions. 8. Each of the parties hereto covenants and agrees that it has the legal capacity to make the AGREEMENTS herein contained, that each AGREEMENT is binding upon that party and that this AGREEMENT is executed by a duly authorized official acting in his official capacity. 9. The terms of this agreement shall remain in force as long as the PROJECT remains in existence. 7 ORDINANCE NO. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have executed this Agreement the year and date first above written. THE CITY OF PALM DESERT By By L 8 T DEVELOPMENT CO. (Notarized) By ATTEST: SHEILA R. GILLIGAN, City Clerk City of Palm Desert, California /dlg 8 ORDINANCE NO. EXHIBIT "I" Legal Description Parcel I The east 112 of Lot 24 Palma Village Groves per map book 20 page 51 Riverside County. Parcel 2 & 3 The portion of Lot 24 of Palma Village Groves per map book 20 page 51 , Riverside County. 9 A ORDINANCE NO. _ EXHIBIT "2" AFFORDABLE HOUSING INCOME AND RENT SCHEDULE - 1986 Income Rent Lower - $15,000 Lower - $375 10 NOTICE OF DETERMINATION NEGATIVE DECLARATION TO: (X) Clerk of the Board of Supervisors ( ) Secretary for Resources County of Riverside 1416 Ninth St. Rm 1311 4080 Lemon Street Sacramento, CA 95814 Riverside, CA 92502 FROM: City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 SUBJECT: Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108 or 21152 of the public resources code. Project Title/Common Name: PP 86-12 Date of Project Approval : May 8, 1986 State Clearinahouse Number (if submitted) : Contact Person: Philip Drell Project Location: Southwest corner of Catalina Way and San Carlos Avenue. Project Description: 20 unit senior housing apartments on .8 acres. . This is to advise that the City of Palm Desert has made the following determinations regarding the above described project: 1. The project ( ) will , (X) will not, have a significant effect on the environment. 2. An environmental impact report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. A copy of the environmental impact report may be examined at the above city hall address. X A negative declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. A copy of the negative declaration may be examined at the above city hall address. 3. Mitigation measures (X) were, ( ) were not, made a condition of the approval of the project. 4. A statement of overriding considerations ( ) was, (X) was not, adopted for this project. � // (3OAF0 OF SUPERVISOR? l u n' dig4nate Title MAY 19 1986 CLCRK4t cAunt M 4w wOF3G OF e of ca w..j t:ounty M giversitle,State 01 Gliimda Date Received for Filing '-W� G'kr:n+ ^,Assis'an'. Please return date-stamped copy in the enclosed envelope. r%FIEa It i \������ cSo y RERMUDA DUNES r Desert Sands Unified School District RANCHO MIRAGE 82-879 HIGHWAY 111 • INDIO, CALIFORNIA 92201-5678 • 1619) 347-8631 INDIAN WELLS �+ PALM DESERT a April 3 , 1986 ,P LA QUINTA INDIO y° US� WY) 'D 1-9 APR 8 1986 Mr. Phil Drell Associate Planner COMMUNITY OCKLOFh1ENi DEPARTMENT CITY OF"FALM DESERI City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert , CA 92260 Re : PP 86-12 ; Senior Citizen Apartments L & T Development Co . School Mitigation Fees Dear Phil : In order to waive school mitigation fees for a project such as the one referenced above, we would need the assurance that the project could not be converted to general housing unless fees could be collected at the time of conversion. This assurance could be in the form of a use permit requirement for future conversion or a senior citizen overlay zone, etc . We request that you provide us with suitable assurance and we will recommend waiv'ng the fees . Since yo s G � , ichard M. eck ��� Facilities Planner RMB/vmm 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NOTICE OF ACTION August 6, 1986 L 8 T DEVELOPMENT 74-133 E1 Paseo Suite R Palm Desert, CA 92260 RE: PMW 86-8 The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of August 5, 1986. APPROVED BY MINUTE MOTION CARRIED 5-0. Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Community Development, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen ( 15) days of the date of the decisio RAMON A. DIAZ, SECARY PALM DESERT PLANN1111111777777G COMMISSION PAD/dlg Y. n t• PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1132 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT, PRECISE PLAN OF DESIGN AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A 20 UNIT SENIOR CITIZEN APARTMENT PROJECT ON 1 . 18 ACRES AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF CATALINA WAY AND SAN CARLOS AVENUE. CASE NOS. PP 86-12 AND CUP 86-12 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the Ist day of April , 1986, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider the request of L 8 T DEVELOPMENT CO. for approval of a negative declaration of environmental impact, precise plan and conditional use permit to remodel six existing units and construct 14 additional units under provisions of the Senior Housing Overlay zoning ordinance chapter 25.52. WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedure for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 80-89," in that the director of community development has determined that the project will not have a significant impact on the environment and a negative declaration has been prepared. WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be . heard, said planning commission did find the following facts to exist to justify their actions: 1 . The design of the precise plan and conditional use permit will not depreciate property values in the vicinity. The improvements to existing older development, the development of 14 new units and the senior citizen restrictions will upgrade the area and improve neighborhood appearance. 2. The precise plan and conditional use permit will not unreasonably interfere with the use or enjoyment of property int he vicinity nor will it endanger public peace, health, safety or general welfare. Senior housing generates lower impacts than alternative residential uses. 3. The project specifically implements neighborhood improvement, housing rehabilitation, and senior housing goals of the Palm Desert General Plan Housing Element and Palma Village Specific Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1 . That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the commission in this case; PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1132 2. That approval of Precise Plan/Conditional Use Permit 86-12 is on file in the department of community development is hereby approved for reasons subject to the attached conditions. 3. A negative declaration of, environmental impact is hereby approved. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this lst day of April , 1986, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: DOWNS, ERWOOD, RICHARDS, WOOD 8 CRITES NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE UFl RITES, Chairman ATTEST• RAMON A. DIAZ, Secret /tm 2 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1132 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NOS. PP 86-12 AND CUP 86-12 Department of-Community Development: I . This approval shall be contingent upon approval and execution of DA 86-2. 2. The development of the property shall conform substantially with exhibits on file with the department of community development/planning, as modified by the following conditions. 3. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein which are in addition to all municipal ordinances and state and federal statutes now in force, or which hereafter may be in force. 4. Construction of a portion of said project shall commence within one year from the date of final approval unless an extension of time is granted; otherwise said approval shall become null , void and of no effect whatsoever. 5. Prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contemplated by this approval , the applicant shall first obtain permits and/or clearance from the following agencies: Palm Desert Architectural Commission Coachella Valley Water District Riverside County Department of Health City Fire Marshal Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to the department of building and safety at the time of issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. 6. Trash provisions shall be approved by applicable trash company and city prior to issuance of building permit. 7. The minimum age for project occupant shall be 62. B. Project sponsor must post a maintenance bond, letter of credit or cash deposit for the life of the project equivalent to' 25% of the annual maintenance budget for the project, plus reserves for major repair and replacement. 9. If project is ever converted to standard family housing, all requirements of the base R-2 zone would have to be met in addition to payment of $628/unit school impact mitigation fees to the Desert Sands Unified School District. 3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1132 Department of Public Works: 1 . Drainage and signalization fund fees, as required by city ordinance, shall be paid prior to grading permit issuance. 2. Storm drain construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study by the private engineer that is approved by the department of public works. 3. Full public improvements, including traffic safety lighting as required by ordinance and the director of public works, shall be installed in. accordance with city standards. 4. Improvement plans for water and sewer systems shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the city engineer for checking and approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. The engineer shall submit "as built" plans prior to the acceptance of the improvements by the city. 5. Complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the city engineer for checking and approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. The engineer shall submit "as-built" plans submitted to the department of public works prior to the project final . 6. All private driveways and parking lots shall be inspected by the engineering department and a standard inspection fee shall be paid prior to grading permit issuance. 7. Landscaping maintenance on Catalina Way and San Carlos Avenue shall be provided by the property owner. 8. Complete grading plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the city engineer for checking and approval prior to issuance of any permits. 9. Dedication of five feet of right-of-way on Catalina Way shall be done prior to issuance of any permits and approval of plans. 10. Installation of six foot sidewalk on Catalina Way and San Carlos Avenue. 11 . Close unused driveway with full height curb and gutter. 12. Offsite improvement plans to be approved by public works department and a surety posted to guarantee the required offsite improvements prior to grading permit issuance. 13. Installation of sewers to serve this project. 4 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1132 14. Size, number and location of driveways to public works specifications with only three (3) driveway approaches to be allowed to serve this property. 15. Any permit issuance shall be subject to the waiver of parcel map first being approved and recorded. Fire Marshal : I . Install a water system capable of delivering 2500 GPM fire flow from any fire hydrant for a two hour duration in addition to domestic supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement. Fire flow requirements will depend on built-in fire protection provisions of buildings. 2. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants so that no point of any building is more than 250 feet from a fire hydrant measured along approved vehicular travel ways. a. exterior surfaces of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow, and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. b. curbs shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. C. hydrants shall not be located closer than 25 feet to any building. 3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and two copies of the water system plan to the fire marshal for review. Upon approval , one copy will be sent to the building department, and the original will be returned to the developer. 4. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and approved by the water company, with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system in Case No. PP 86-12 is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the fire marshal ." 5. Prior to delivery of combustible materials to the building site, the required water system shall be installed, operating, and delivering the required flow. 6. Additional fire protection requirements may be necessary when the applicant submits specific plans for consideration and approval . 7. Provide sprinkler system or standpipe for all areas beyond 150' Of vehicular access. 5 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1133 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT RELATING TO LOWER INCOME RENTAL CONTROL FOR A 20 UNIT SENIOR CITIZEN APARTMENT PROJECT LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF CATALINA WAY AND SAN CARLOS AVENUE. CASE NO. DA 86-2 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the Ist day of April , 1986, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider the request of L & T DEVELOPMENT CO. for approval of a development agreement relating to the affordable housing requirements for a 20 unit conventional senior housing project on the southwest corner of Catalina Way and San Carlos Avenue. WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said planning commission did find the following facts and reasons to exist to justify their actions: 1 . The proposed development agreement satisfies the intent and purpose of the Senior Housing Overlay and the General Plan Housing Element. 2. The development furthers the general welfare by requiring the construction of needed senior housing affordable by low and moderate Income senior citizen households. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1 . That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the commission in this case; 2. That approval of DA 86-2 Exhibit "A". is hereby recommended to the city council . PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this Ist day of April , 1986, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: DOWNS, ERWOOD, RICHARDS, WOOD, AND CRITES NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE _ ABSTAIN: NONE BbFORi ATT I'RITES, Chairman ` U RAMON A. DIAZ, Sec et PLANNING COMMISSION Rk:k&UT1ON NO. 1133 EXHIBIT "A" L R T DEVELOPMENT COMPANY - AFFORDABLE SENIOR HOUSING DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT This agreement, made as of this day of , 1986 between the City of Palm Desert, a California municipal corporation (hereinafter "CITY") and L 8 T Development Co. , (hereinafter "DEVELOPER") provides: Recitals 1 . DEVELOPER is owner of certain real property located within the City of Palm Desert, California, which property is described in Exhibit I , attached hereto and made a part hereof (hereinafter "PROPERTY"). DEVELOPER has applied for and been granted approval of a precise plan/conditional use permit (PP/CUP 86-12) to construct 20 conventional senior housing units on the PROPERTY. 2. As a condition of said approval , CITY and DEVELOPER have agreed that 20% of units associated with the project be set aside_ for lower income occupants subject to restrictions necessary to insure the continued occupancy of said units by lower income senior citizen households. These units shall hereafter be referred to as "AFFORDABLE SENIOR UNITS." 2 i PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1133 3. DEVELOPER and CITY desire to further memorialize and implement the conditions of said approval and do hereby agree to the following terms and conditions. 4. As used herein, the following terms shall be defined as: A. SENIOR CITIZEN HOUSEHOLD - Maximum two person household of which one member is 62 years of age or older. B. CONVENTIONAL SENIOR HOUSING. - Rental or ownership units designed - and restricted to healthy ambulatory senior citizens who remain capable of performing most activities associated with independent daily life. Other than having smaller units and possessing design features and recreational amenities more compatible with a less active lifestyle conventional senior housing resembles standard housing. C. LOWER INCOME SENIOR CITIZEN HOUSEHOLD - Senior Citizen Households whose gross income does not exceed 80% of the median Income for a one person household for Riverside County based upon financial and demographic data received from the United States Department of Housing and Community Development (HUD) or its successor agency. This information is included in 3 i PLANNING COMMISSION I.-.,OLUTION NO. 1133 Exhibit "2" and shall be up dated automatically as current data is obtained from HUD. If in the future, more relevant data is made available specifically applicable to senior citizens by (HUD) or other officially recognized agencies, such data shall become the basis of this agreement. Agreement 1 . DEVELOPER has been conditionally granted permission by the CITY to construct 20 rental conventional senior housing units on the PROPERTY by Precise Plan/Conditional Use Permit 86-12 Planning Commission Resolution No. As a condition of said approval DEVELOPER hereby agrees to reserve and make affordable four studio units for lower income senior citizen households. 2. Monthly rents for the AFFORDABLE SENIOR UNITS shall not exceed 30% of the maximum. gross monthly income as shown for lower income households in Exhibit "2". . 3. The DEVELOPER or his assigned management agent shall be responsible for determining eligibility of prospective tenants. Prior to opening the project the DEVELOPER shall submit for approval a plan to the CITY describing the procedure for determining and enforcing eligibility requirements . This plan shall include annual qualification by all 4 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION No. 1133 eligible households and a annual audit at the DEVELOPERS'S cost by the CITY or its assigned agents determining compliance with all aspects of this agreement. 4. The DEVELOPER shall not discriminate on the basis of race, creed, sex or national origin. 5. The provisions of this agreement shall run with, burden and bind the DEVELOPER and his successors. The provisions hereof shall be enforceable by appropriate legal action brought by the CITY. In the event legal action is brought to enforce any provision hereof, the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorney's fees together with other legally allowable costs. i 6. This agreement shall be reviewed by the CITY planning commission every 6 months, at which time the applicant or his successor shall be required to demonstrate good faith compliance with the terms of the agreement. If as a result of this review, the commission finds and determines, on the basis of substantial evidence, that the applicant has not complied in good faith with terms or conditions of the agreement, it shall recommend to the city council that the agreement be modified or terminated. If the city council concurs with the planning commission recommendation the agreement shall be modified or terminated. Proceeding before the city council shall be a noticed public hearing. If at the time of the hearings 5 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1133 substantial improvements have not yet occurred on the site, termination of the AGREEMENT will also involve revocation of all previous approvals and permits associated herewith. if substantial improvements are already in place and modifications acceptable to the CITY cannot be negotiated then enforcement of provisions of this agreement shall be pursued through legal action per No. 6 of this AGREEMENT. 7. The AGREEMENT shall be construed according to the laws of the State of California. If any portion of the AGREEMENT is for any reasons held to be unenforceable, such determination shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions. 8. Each of the parties hereto covenants and agrees that it has the legal capacity to make the AGREEMENTS herein contained, that each AGREEMENT is binding upon that party and that this AGREEMENT is executed by a duly authorized official acting in his official capacity. 9. The terms of this agreement shall remain in force as long as the PROJECT remains in existence. 6 f PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1133 IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have executed this Agreement the year and date first above written. THE CITY OF PALM DESERT By BY L & T DEVELOPMENT CO. (Notarized) BY ATTEST: SHEILA R. GILLIGAN, City Clerk City of Palm Desert, California /tm 7 PLANNING COMMISSION Rt,,.d_UTION No. 1133 EXHIBIT "I" Legal Description Parcel 1 The east 1/2 of Lot 24 Palma Village Groves per map book 20 page 51 Riverside County. Parcel 2 8 3 The portion of Lot 24 of Palma Village Groves per map book 20 page 51 , Riverside County. B PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1133 EXHIBIT "2" AFFORDABLE HOUSING INCOME AND RENT SCHEDULE - 1986 Income Rent Lower - $15,000 Lower - $375 i i 9 . e CITY OF PALM DESERT DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT TO: PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: APRIL 1 , 1986 CASE NOS: PP 86-12, CUP 86-12 AND DA 86-2 REQUEST: Approval of a negative declaration of environmental Impact, precise, conditional use permit, and development agreement for a 20 unit senior citizen apartment project on 1 .8 acres within the R-2,—senior overlay zone at the southwest corner of Catalina Way and San Carlos Avenue. APPLICANT: L 8 T DEVELOPMENT 74-133 El Paseo, Suite 9 Palm Desert, CA 92260 1. BACKGROUND: A. ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE: NORTH: R-2 S.O./VACANT SOUTH: R-2 S.O./DUPLEX EAST: R-2 S.O./VACANT WEST: R-2 S.O./MIXED SINGLE FAMILY AND MULTI FAMILY B. PALMA VILLAGE SPECIFIC PLAN DESIGNATION: Senior housing. C. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The project will not generate significant adverse Impacts. The Desert Sands Unified School District has informed the city that Impact fees would be required if the age 62 limitation was ever removed. A draft negative declaration has been prepared. 11. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Presently 6 older rental units and one single family home exist on the property. The home and five of the rental units will be completely remodeled, one unit will be demolished and 14 additional units will be constructed under the age 62 minimum provisions of the senior overlay. STAFF REPORT CONTINUED ^'- PROJECT DATA Proiect Ordinance Requirement Project area 1 . 18 acres Unit mix 5 2 bd 1000 sq. ft. 800 sq. ft. min. l 1 bd 605 sq. ft. 600 sq. ft. min. 14 studio 631 sq. ft. 450 sq. ft. min. Total units 20 Project Population 29.25 35.4 maximum Intensity Population/acre 24.8 30 maximum Building Height 15 feet 24 feet Interior Setbacks 5' to 15, S' - 9' Front Setbacks 15 feet 15 feet Parking 30 spaces 20 spaces ( 17 covered 13 uncovered) Building Coverage 34% 50% maximum Landscaped Open Space 51% Recreational Amenities 1 swimming pool i spa Ill. ANALYSIS: The proposal complies with all applicable standards of the R-2 and Senior Overlay zones. . The project implements two important goals of the Palma Village Plan: 1 ) The upgrading of older housing; 2) The construction of new senior housing. The senior overlay requires that 10% of the project be reserved and made affordable by lower income households and 10% by median moderate income households. The applicant has agreed to forge the moderate income units and provide all 20% (4 units) at the lower income rate. Four large 631 square foot studios would be controlled. Under the existing schedule maximum rents would be $375/month with a maximum income of $15,000/year. The terms of the controls are described in the development agreement and are similar to those of past projects. FINDINGS: 1 . The design of the precise plan and conditional use permit will not depreciate property values in the vicinity. The improvements to existing older development, the development of 14 new units and the senior citizen restrictions will upgrade the area and improve neighborhood appearance. 2 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NOS. PP 86-12 AND CUP 86-12 Department of Camiunity Development: 1. This approval shall be contingent upon approval and execution of DA 86-2. 2. The development of the property shall conform substantially with exhibits on file with the department of community development/planning, as modified by the following conditions. 3. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein which are in addition to all municipal ordinances and state and federal statutes now in force, or which hereafter may be in force. 4. Construction of a portion of said project shall commence within one year from the date of final approval unless an extension of time is granted; otherwise said approval shall become null , void and of no effect whatsoever. 5. Prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contemplated by this approval , the applicant shall first obtain permits and/or clearance from the following agencies: Palm Desert Architectural Commission Coachella Valley Water District Riverside County Department of Health City Fire Marshal Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to the department of building and safety at the time of issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. 6. Trash provisions shall be approved by applicable trash company and city prior to issuance of building permit. 7. The minimum age for project occupant shall be 62. 8. Project sponsor must post a maintenance bond, letter of credit or cash deposit for the life of the project equivalent to 25% of the annual maintenance budget for the project, plus reserves for major repair and replacement. 9. If project is ever converted to standard family housing, all requirements of the base R-2 zone would have to be met in addition to payment of $628/unit school impact mitigation fees to the Desert Sands Unified School District. 3 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 Pursuant to Title 14, Division 6, Article 7, Section 15083, of the California Administrative Code. NEGATIVE DECLARATION CASE NOS: PP 86-12, CUP 86-12 and DA 86-2 APPLICANT/PROJECT SPONSOR: L & T DEVELOPMENT, 74-133 El Paseo, Suite 9, Palm Desert, CA 92260. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/LOCATION: 20 unit senior citizen apartment project on 1 .8 acres within the R-2 senior overly zone at the southwest corner of Catalina Way and San Carlos Avenue. The Director of the Department of Community Development, City of Palm Desert, California, has found that the described project will not have a significant effect on the environment. A copy of the Initial Study has been attached to document the reasons in support of this finding. Mitigation measures, if any, included in the project to avoid potentially significant effects, may also be found attached. ---------------------------------------- RAMON A. DIAZ DATE DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT /tm CASE NO. ENVIA0 IT-IENTAL SERVICES DEPT. INITIAL STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION CHECKLIST NOTE: The availability of data necessary to address the topics listed below shall form the basis of a decision as to whether the application is considered complete for purposes of environmental assessment. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers , possible mitigation measures and comments are provided on attached sheets). Yes Maybe No 1 . Earth. Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in _ _✓ geologic substructures? b. Disruptions, displacements , compaction, or overcovering of the soil ? c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? d. The destruction, covering, or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? _ b. The creation of objectionable odors? c. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? i 2, Yes Maybe No 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: 4... Changes in currents, "or the course or S direction of water movements? b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? d. Alteration of -the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? e. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or with- drawals, or through interception of an - aquifer by cuts or excavations? f. Reduction in the amount of water other- wise available for public.water supplies? - - c,- 4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass , and crops)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or endangered species of plants? — — c. introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? 5. Animal: Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, . land animals including reptiles, or insects)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or endangered species of animals? — . c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to / the migration or movement of animals? — — d. Deterioration to existing wildlife habitat? 4 I ( 3. Yes Mbe No 6. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in :the rate of use of any natural resources? r b. Depletion of:any non-renewable natural resource? 7. Energy. Will proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? — — i b. Demand upon existing sources of energy, or re- quire the-development of new sources of energy? v 8. Risk of Upset4Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, pesticides, oil , chemicals , or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? — 9. Economic Loss. Will the proposal result in: a. A change in the value of property and improvements endangered by flooding? — b. A change in the value of property and improvementsrexposed to geologic hazards beyond accepted community risk standards? 10. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels toethe point at which accepted community noise and vibration levels are exceeded? 11. Land Use. Willethe proposal result in the a tTeration of the present developed or planned land use of an area? 12. Open Space. Will the proposal lead to a decrease in theramount of designated open space? 13. Population. Will the proposal result in: a. Alteration of� the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of the City? b. Change in the population distribution by r aye, income, -'religion, racial , or ethnic group, occupational class, household type? 4. Yes Maybe No 14. Emoloyment. Will the proposal result in additional new long-term jobs provided, or a change in the number and per cent employed, unemployed, and underemployed? _ 15. Housing. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in number and per cent of housing units by type (price or rent range, zoning category, owner-occupied and rental , etc. ) relative to demand or to number of families in various income classes in the City? _ b. Impacts on existing housing or creation of a demand for additional housing? 16. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a. Generation of additional vehicular movement? b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? c/ c. Impact upon existing transportation systems? d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? e. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists, or pedestrians? 17. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect - upon, or result in a need for, new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? 'b. Police protection? c. Schools? _ _ d. Parks or other recreational facilities? _ e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? _ f. .Other governmental services? _ _ _ 5. Yes Maybe No Y 18. Public Fiscal Balance. Will the proposal result in a net change in government fiscal flow (revenues less operating expenditures and annualized capital expenditures)? 19. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? b. Communications system? i c. Water? d. Sewer or septic tanks? e. Storm water drainage? v f. Solid waste and disposal? 20. Human Health. Will the proposal result in: a. The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? b. A change in the level of community health care provided? j 21. Social Services. Will the proposal result in an increased demand for provision of general social services? 22. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in: a. Obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to .the public? b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? — — �/- c. Lessening of the overall neighborhood (or area) attractiveness, pleasantness, and uniqueness? 23.' Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? _ L/ 24. Arch�eolo ical/Historical . Will the proposal result in an a tee rat on of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object, or building? 6. Yes MaLbe No 25. Mandatory Findings of Significance. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment or to curtail the diversity in the environment? b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental _goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future" }- _ c. Does the project have impacts which are indi- vidually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small , but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant. ) d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Initial Study Prepared By: r \� _ I r 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 PIn 'h I4, 1986 CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE CASE NO. PP 86-12 and DA 86-2 11NICE. 15 HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held before the Palm 1e55rrt Planning Commission to consider a request by TIRRE/LIPPMAN for approval �„ a Negative Declaration of Environmental import. Precise Plan and Development - Acuerment for a 20 unit senior citizen apartment project on 1 .8 acres at the -,J hwest corner of Catalina Way and San Carlos Avenue, more particularly _ rh�;cribed as: APN 627-113-008, 009 8 010 �ffVI FI uRANCHO R Rat aL11 i , 3 177 tormerly 441h AVE. ) 1Y P J W 3 A N TA 0 S 4LXF i Z �F ENV a S. J S.O. R- S P AY S0. ' CATA LI NA :: AY m w-o S.0 LL I L a w - o � z Z W w � � Ltldd) �% R- 1 R`I 'OLY LHIvE - ? Is o00 ,? 14 0 -r (5)22 R-2(5)� �_w R � CLJ = �� Rrt I ,z� _4 %7y- 7/ - Uum a i � � SAIU public hearing will beheld on Tuesday. April 1. 1986 at 7:00 p.m. in rho Council Chamber at the Palm Desert City Hall. 73-510 Fred Waring Drive. Palm Desert. California, at which time and place all Interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. If you challenge the proposed actions in court. you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described In this notice, or in written ,irespondence delivered to the city council (or planning commission) at, or prior to, the public hearing. P'HBLISH: Desert Post RAMON A. DIAZ. Secretary March 21. 1986 Palm Desert Planning Commission I` _ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT RELATING TO LOWER INCOME RENTAL CONTROL FOR A 20 UNIT SENIOR CITIZEN APARTMENT PROJECT LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF CATALINA WAY AND SAN CARLOS AVENUE. CASE NO. DA 86-2 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the ist day of April , 1986, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider the request of L 8 T DEVELOPMENT CO. for approval of a deve 1 opment agreement relating to the affordable housing requirements for a 20 unit conventional senior housing project on the southwest corner of Catalina Way and San Carlos Avenue. WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said planning commission did find the following facts and reasons to exist to justify their actions: 1 . The proposed development agreement satisfies the intent and purpose of the Senior Housing Overlay and the General Plan Housing Element. 2. The development furthers the general welfare by requiring the construction of needed senior housing affordable by low and moderate Income senior citizen households. NOW, THEREFORE, BE . IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1 . That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the commission in this case; 2. That approval of DA 86-2 Exhibit "A" is hereby recommended to the city council . PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 1st day of April , 1986, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: BUFORD CRITES, Chairman ATTEST: RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary PAING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CiTY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT, PRECISE PLAN OF DESIGN AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A 20 UNIT SENIOR CITIZEN APARTMENT PROJECT ON 1 . 18 ACRES AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF CATALiNA WAY AND SAN CARLOS AVENUE. CASE NOS. PP 86-12 AND CUP 86-12 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 1st day of April , 1986, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider the request of L S T DEVELOPMENT CO. for approval of a negative declaration of environmental impact, precise plan and conditional use permit to remodel six existing units and construct 14 additional units under provisions of the Senior Housing Overlay zoning ordinance chapter 25.52. WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedure for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 80-89," in that the director of community development has determined that the project will not have a significant impact on the environment and a negative declaration has been prepared. WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all Interested persons desiring to be heard, said planning commission did find the following facts to exist to justify their actions: 1 . The design of the precise plan and conditional use permit will not depreciate property values in the vicinity. The improvements to existing older development, the development of 14 new units and the senior citizen restrictions will upgrade the area and improve neighborhood appearance. 2. The precise plan and conditional use permit will not unreasonably interfere with the use or enjoyment of property int he vicinity nor will it endanger public peace, health, safety or general welfare. Senior housing generates lower impacts than alternative residential uses. 3. The project specifically implements neighborhood improvement, housing rehabilitation, and senior housing goals of the Palm Desert General PLan Housing Element and Palma Village Specific Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1 . That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the commission in this case; PLANNING COMMISSION RExiLUTION NO- 2. That approval of Precise Plan/Conditional Use Permit 86-12 is on file in the department of community development is hereby approved for reasons subject to the attached conditions. 3. A negative declaration of environmental impact is hereby approved. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this ist day of April , 1986, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: BUFORD CRITES, Chairman ATTEST: RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary /tm 2 1 PLANNING COMMISSION REN)LUTION NO. Department of Public Works: 1 . Drainage and signalization fund fees, as required by city ordinance, shall be paid prior to grading permit issuance. 2. Storm drain construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study by the private engineer that is approved by the department of public works. 3. Full pub lic° improvements, including traffic safety lighting as required by ordinance and the director of public works, shall be installed in accordance with city standards. 4. Improvement plans for water and sewer systems shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the city engineer for checking and approval before construction of any improvements Is commenced. The engineer shall submit "as built" plans prior to the acceptance of the improvements by the city. 5. Complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the city engineer for checking and approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. The engineer shall submit "as-built" plans submitted to the department of public works prior to the project final . 6. All private driveways and parking lots shall be inspected by the engineering department and a standard inspection fee shall be paid prior to grading permit issuance. 7. Landscaping maintenance on Catalina Way and San Carlos Avenue shall be provided by the property owner. 8. Complete grading plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the city engineer for checking and approval prior to issuance of any permits. 9. Dedication of five feet of right-of-way on Catalina Way shall be done prior to issuance of any permits and approval of plans. 10. Installation of six foot sidewalk on Catalina Way and San Carlos Avenue. 11. Close unused driveway with full height curb and gutter. 12. Off sIte Improvement plans to be approved by public works department and a surety posted to guarantee the required offsite Improvements prior to grading permit issuance. 13. Installation of sewers to serve this project. 4 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14. Size, number and location of driveways to public works specifications with only three (3) driveway approaches to be allowed to serve this property. 15. Any permit issuance shall be subject to the waiver of parcel map first being approved and recorded. Fire Marshal : 1. Install a water system capable of delivering 2500 GPM fire flow from any fire hydrant for a two hour duration in addition to domestic supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure In the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement. Fire flow requirements will depend on built-in fire protection provisions of buildings. 2. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants so that no point of any building is more than 250 feet from a fire hydrant measured along approved vehicular travel ways. a. exterior surfaces of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow, and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. b. curbs shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. C. hydrants shall not be located closer than 25 feet to any building. 3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and two copies of the water system plan to the fire marshal for review. Upon approval , one copy will be sent to the building department, and the original will be returned to the developer. 4. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and approved by the water company, with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system in Case No. PP 86-12 is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the fire marshal ." 5. Prior to delivery of combustible materials to the building site, the required water system shall be installed, operating, and delivering the required flow. 6. Additional fire protection requirements may be necessary when the applicant submits specific plans for consideration and approval . 7. Provide sprinkler system or standpipe for all areas beyond 150' of vehicular access. 5 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION No. of the AGREEMENT will also involve revocation of all previous approvals and permits associated herewith. If substantial Improvements are already in place and modifications acceptable to the CITY cannot be negotiated then enforcement of provisions of this agreement shall be pursued through legal action per No. 6 of this AGREEMENT. 7. The AGREEMENT shall be construed according to the laws of the State of California. if any portion of the AGREEMENT is for any reasons held to be unenforceable, such determination shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions. 8. Each of the parties hereto covenants and agrees that It has the legal capacity to make the AGREEMENTS herein contained, that each AGREEMENT is binding upon that party and that this AGREEMENT is executed by a duly authorized official acting in his official capacity. 9. The terms of this agreement shall remain in force as long as the PROJECT remains in existence. 6 PLANNING COMMISSION JILUTION NO. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have executed this Agreement the year and date first above written. THE CITY OF PALM DESERT By 8Y L 8 T DEVELOPMENT CO. (Notarized) By ATTEST: SHEILA R. GILLIGAN, City Clerk City of Palm Desert, California /tm 7 PLANNING COMMISSION REbOLUTION NO- EXHIBIT "A" L E T DEVELOPMENT COMPANY AFFORDABLE SENIOR HOUSING DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT This agreement, made as of this _ day of , 1986 between the City of Palm Desert, a California municipal corporation (hereinafter "CITY") and L 8 T Development Co. , (hereinafter "DEVELOPER") provides: Recitals 1 . DEVELOPER is owner of certain real property located within the City of Palm Desert, California, which property is described in Exhibit 1 , attached hereto and made a part hereof (hereinafter "PROPERTY") . DEVELOPER has applied for and been granted approval of a precise plan/conditional use permit (PP/CUP 86- 12) to construct 20 conventional senior housing units on the PROPERTY. 2. As a condition opp f said approval , CITY and DEVELOPER have agreed that 20% of units associated with the project be set aside for lower income occupants subject to restrictions necessary to insure the continued occupancy of said units by lower income senior citizen households. These units shall hereafter be referred to as "AFFORDABLE SENIOR UNITS." 2 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3. DEVELOPER and CITY desire to further memorialize and implement the conditions of said approval and do hereby agree to the following terms and conditions. 4. As used herein, the following terms shall be defined as: A. SENIOR CITIZEN HOUSEHOLD - Maximum two person household of which one member is 62 years of age or older. B. CONVENTIONAL SENIOR HOUSING - Rental or ownership units designed and restricted to healthy ambulatory senior citizens who remain capable of performing most activities associated with independent daily life. Other than having smaller units and possessing design features and recreational amenities more compatible with a less active lifestyle conventional senior housing resembles standard housing. C. LOWER INCOME SENIOR CITIZEN HOUSEHOLD - Senior Citizen Households whose gross income does not exceed 80% of the median Income for a one person household for Riverside County based upon financial and demographic data received from the United States Department of Housing and Community Development (HUD) or its successor agency. This information is included in Exhibit "2" and shall be up dated automatically as current data 3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO- Exhibit "2" and shall be up dated automatically as current data is obtained from HUD. If in the future, more relevant data is made available specifically applicable- to senior citizens by (HUD) or other officially recognized agencies, such data shall become the basis of this agreement. Agreement 1 . DEVELOPER has been conditionally granted permission by the CITY to construct 20 rental conventional senior housing units on the PROPERTY by Precise Plan/Conditional Use Permit 86-12 Planning Commission Resolution No. As a condition of said approval DEVELOPER hereby agrees to reserve and make affordable four studio units for lower income senior citizen households. 2. Monthly rents for the AFFORDABLE SENIOR UNITS shall not exceed 301E of the maximum gross monthly income as shown for lower income households in Exhibit "2". 3. The DEVELOPER or his assigned management agent shall be responsible for determining eligibility of prospective tenants. Prior to opening the project the DEVELOPER shall submit for approval a plan to the CITY describing the procedure for determining and enforcing eligibility requirements. This plan shall include annual qualification by all Cal- i+7 as S PLANNING COMMISSION kcaOLUTION NO. CITY or its assigned agents determining compliance with all aspects of this agreement. 4. The DEVELOPER shall not discriminate on the basis of race, creed, sex or national origin. 5. The provisions of this agreement shall run with, burden and bind the DEVELOPER and his successors. The provisions hereof shall be enforceable by appropriate legal action brought by the CITY. In the event legal action is brought to enforce any provision hereof, the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorney's fees together with other legally allowable costs. 6. This agreement shall be reviewed by the CITY planning commission every 6 months, at which time the applicant or his successor shall be required to demonstrate good faith compliance with the terms of the agreement. If as a result of this review, the commission finds and determines, on the basis of substantial evidence, that the applicant has not complied in good faith with terms or conditions of the agreement, it shall recommend to the city .council that the agreement be modified or terminated. If the city council concurs with the planning commission recommendation the agreement shall be modified or terminated. Proceeding before the city council shall be a noticed public hearing. If at the time of the hearings substantial improvements have not yet occurred on the site, termination 5 r PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. EXHIBIT "1" Legal Description Parcel 1 The east 1/2 of Lot 24 Palma Village Groves per map book 20 page 51 .Riverside County. Parcel 2 & 3 The portion of Lot 24 of Palma Village Groves per map book 20 page 51 Riverside County. 8 PLANNING COMMISSION RtaOLUTION NO. EXHIBIT "2" AFFORDABLE HOUSING INCOME AND RENT SCHEDULE - 1986 Income Rent Lower - $15,000 Lower - $375 9 STAFF REPORT CONTINUED 2. The precise plan and conditional use permit will not unreasonably interfere with the use or enjoyment of property int he vicinity nor will it endanger public peace, health, safety or general welfare. Senior housing generates lower impacts than alternative residential uses. 3. The project specifically implements neighborhood improvement, housing rehabilitation, and senior housing goals of the Palm Desert General Plan Housing Element and Palma Village Specific Plan. [II. RECOMMENDATION: Approve findings and adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. approving PP 86-12 and CUP 86-12, subject to attached conditions. Adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. recommending approval of DA -2 to city council . IV. ATTACHMENTS: 1 . Draft Resolutions 2. Negative Declaration 3. Legal Notice 4. Maps and Exhibits Prepared by s' ` - Reviewed and Approved by /tm 3 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NOTICE OF ACTION Date: April 3, 1986 L & T DEVELOPMENT 74-133 E1 Paseo, Ste. 9 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Re: �PP�86�f1�24 CUP 86-12, and DA 86-2 The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of April 1 , 1986. APPROVED BY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NOS. 1132 AND 1133. CARRIED 5-0. Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Community Development, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen ( 15) days of the date of the decision. RAMON A. DIAZ, SEC TARt'/ PALM DESERT PLANNING MISSION RAD/tm PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1132 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT, PRECISE PLAN OF DESIGN AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A 20 UNIT SENIOR CITIZEN APARTMENT PROJECT ON 1 . 18 ACRES AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF CATALINA WAY AND SAN CARLOS AVENUE. CASE NOS. PP 86-12 AND CUP 86-12 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the Ist day of April , 1986, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider the request of L S T DEVELOPMENT CO. for approval of a negative declaration of environmental impact, precise plan and conditional use permit to remodel six existing units and construct 14 additional units under provisions of the Senior Housing Overlay zoning ordinance chapter 25.52. WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedure for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 80-89," in that the director of community development has determined that the project will not have a significant impact on the environment and a negative declaration has been prepared. WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said planning commission did find the following facts to exist to justify their actions: 1. The design of the precise plan and conditional use permit will not depreciate property values in the vicinity. The improvements to existing older development, the development of 14 new units and the senior citizen restrictions will upgrade the area and improve neighborhood appearance. 2. The precise plan and conditional use permit will not unreasonably interfere with the use or enjoyment of property int he vicinity nor will it endanger public peace, health, safety or general welfare. Senior housing generates lower impacts than alternative residential uses. 3. The project specifically implements neighborhood improvement , housing rehabilitation, and senior housing goals of the Palm Desert General PLan Housing Element and Palma Village Specific Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of- the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1 . That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the commission in this case; PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1132 2. That approval of Precise Plan/Conditional Use Permit 86-12 is On file in the department of community development is hereby approved for reasons subject to the attached conditions. 3. A negative declaration of environmental impact is hereby approved. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 1st day of April , 1986, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: DOWNS, ERWOOD, RICHARDS, WOOD 8 CRITES NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE UFOR�Y RITES, Chairman ATTEST• 4, N'� ,4, m RAMON A. DIAZ, Secret /tm 2 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1132 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NOS. PP 86-12 AND CUP 86-12 Department of Community Development: I . This approval shall be contingent upon approval and execution of DA 86-2. 2. The development of the property shall conform substantially with exhibits on file with the department of community development/planning, as modified by the following conditions. 3. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein which are in addition to all municipal ordinances and state and federal statutes now in force, or which hereafter may be in force. 4. Construction of a portion of said project shall commence within one year from the date of final approval unless an extension of time is granted; otherwise said approval shall become null , void and of no effect whatsoever. 5. Prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contemplated by this approval , the applicant shall first obtain permits and/or clearance from the following agencies: Palm Desert Architectural Commission Coachella Valley Water District Riverside County Department of Health City Fire Marshal Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to the department of building and safety at the time of issuance of a building permit for the, use contemplated herewith. 6. Trash provisions shall be approved by applicable trash company and city prior to issuance of building permit. 7. The minimum age for project occupant shall be 62. 8. Project sponsor must post a maintenance bond, letter of credit or cash deposit for the life of the project equivalent to 25% of the annual maintenance budget for the project, plus reserves for major repair and replacement. 9. If project is ever converted to standard family housing, all requirements of the base R-2 zone would have to be met in addition to payment of $628/unit school impact mitigation fees to the Desert Sands Unified School District. 3 A PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1132 Department of Public Storks: I . Drainage and signalization fund fees, as required by city ordinance, shall be paid prior to grading permit issuance. 2. Storm drain construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study by the private engineer that is approved by the department of public works. 3. Full public improvements, including traffic safety Iighting as required by ordinance and the director of public works, shall be installed in accordance with city standards. 4. Improvement plans for water and sewer systems shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the city engineer for checking and approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. The engineer shall submit "as built" plans prior to the acceptance of the improvements by the city. 5. Complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the city engineer for checking and approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. The engineer shall submit "as-built" plans submitted to the department of public works prior to the project final . 6. All private driveways and parking lots shall be inspected by the engineering department and a standard inspection fee shall be paid prior to grading permit issuance. 7. Landscaping maintenance on Catalina Way and San Carlos Avenue shall be provided by the property owner. 8. Complete grading plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the city engineer for checking and approval prior to issuance of any permits. 9. Dedication of five feet of right-of-way on Catalina Way shall be done prior to issuance of any permits and approval of plans. 10. Installation of six foot sidewalk on Catalina Way and San Carlos Avenue. 11 . Close unused driveway with full height curb and gutter. 12. Offsite improvement plans to be approved by public works department and a surety posted to guarantee the required offsite improvements prior to grading permit issuance. 13. Installation of sewers to serve this project. 4 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1132 14. Size, number and location of driveways to public works specifications with only three (3 ) driveway approaches to be allowed to serve this property. 15. Any permit issuance shall be subject to the waiver of parcel map first being approved and recorded. Fire Marshal • 1 . Install a water system capable of delivering 2500 GPM fire flow from any fire hydrant for a two hour duration in addition to domestic supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement. Fire flow requirements will depend on built-in fire protection provisions of buildings. 2. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants so that no point of any building is more than 250 feet from a fire hydrant measured along approved vehicular travel ways. a. exterior surfaces of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow, and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. b. curbs shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. C. hydrants shall not be located closer than 25 feet to any building. 3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and two copies of the water system plan to the fire marshal for review. Upon approval , one copy will be sent to the building department, and the original will be returned to the developer. 4. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and approved by the water company, with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system in Case No. PP 86-12 is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the fire marshal ." 5. Prior to delivery of combustible materials to the building site, the required water system shall be installed, operating, and delivering the required flow. 6. Additional fire protection requirements may be necessary when the applicant submits specific plans for consideration and approval . 7. Provide sprinkler system or standpipe for all areas beyond 150' of vehicular access. 5 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1133 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT RELATING TO LOWER INCOME RENTAL CONTROL FOR A 20 UNIT SENIOR CITIZEN APARTMENT PROJECT LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF CATALINA WAY AND SAN CARLOS AVENUE. CASE NO. DA 86-2 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the Ist day of April , 1986, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider the request of L 8 T DEVELOPMENT CO. for approval of a development agreement relating to the affordable housing requirements for a 20 unit conventional senior housing project on the southwest corner of Catalina Way and San Carlos Avenue. WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said planning commission did find the following facts and reasons to exist to justify their actions: 1 . The proposed development agreement satisfies the intent and purpose of the Senior Housing Overlay and the General Plan Housing Element. 2. The development furthers the general welfare by requiring the construction of needed senior housing affordable by low and moderate income senior citizen households. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1 . That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the commission in this case; 2. That approval of DA 86-2 Exhibit "A" is hereby recommended to the city council . PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this lst day of April , 1986, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: DOWNS, ERWOOD, RICHARDS, WOOD, AND CRITES NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE --� ABSTAIN: NONE RF R�CRITES, Chairman ATT RAMON A. DIAZ, Sec et PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1133 ^' EXHIBIT "A" L E T DEVELOPMENT COMPANY AFFORDABLE SENIOR HOUSING DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT This agreement, made as of this _ day of 1986 between the City of Palm Desert, a California municipal corporation (hereinafter "CITY") and L & T Development Co. , (hereinafter "DEVELOPER") provides: Recitals 1 . DEVELOPER is owner of certain real property located within the City of Palm Desert, California, which property is described in Exhibit 1 , attached hereto and made a part hereof (hereinafter "PROPERTY") . DEVELOPER has applied for and been granted approval of a precise plan/conditional use permit (PP/CUP 86-12) to construct 20 conventional senior housing units on the PROPERTY. 2. As a condition of said approval , CITY and DEVELOPER have agreed that 20% of units associated with the project be set aside for lower income occupants subject to restrictions necessary to insure the continued occupancy of said units by lower income senior citizen households. These units shall hereafter be referred to as "AFFORDABLE SENIOR UNITS." 2 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1133 3. DEVELOPER and CITY desire to further memorialize and implement the conditions of said approval and do hereby agree to the following terms and conditions. 4. As used herein, the following terms shall be defined as: A. SENIOR CITIZEN HOUSEHOLD - Maximum two person household of which one member is 62 years of age or older. B. CONVENTIONAL SENIOR HOUSING - Rental or ownership units designed and restricted to healthy ambulatory senior citizens who remain capable of performing most activities associated with independent daily life. Other than having smaller units and possessing design features and recreational amenities more compatible with a less active lifestyle conventional senior housing resembles standard housing. C. LOWER INCOME SENIOR CITIZEN HOUSEHOLD - Senior Citizen Households whose gross income does not exceed 80% of the median income for a one person household for Riverside County based upon financial and demographic data received from the United States Department of Housing and Community Development (HUD) or its successor agency. This information is included in 3 f PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1133 Exhibit "2" and shall be up dated automatically as current data is obtained from HUD. If in the future, more relevant data is made available specifically applicable to senior citizens by (HUD) or other officially recognized agencies, such data shall become the basis of this agreement. Agreement 1 . DEVELOPER has been conditionally granted permission by the CITY to construct 20 rental conventional senior housing units on the PROPERTY by Precise Plan/Conditional Use Permit 86-12 Planning Commission Resolution No. As a condition of said approval DEVELOPER hereby agrees to reserve and make affordable four studio units for lower income senior citizen households. 2. Monthly rents for the AFFORDABLE SENIOR UNITS shalt not exceed 30% of the maximum gross monthly income as shown for lower income households in Exhibit "2". 3. The DEVELOPER or his assigned management agent shall be responsible for determining eligibility of prospective tenants. Prior to opening the project the DEVELOPER shall submit for approval a plan to the C I TY describing the procedure for determining and enforcing eligibility requirements . This plan shall include annual qualification by all 4 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1133 e l i g i b l e househo l ds and a annua l and i t at the DEVELOPERS'S cost by the CITY or its assigned agents determining compliance with all aspects of this agreement. 4. The DEVELOPER shall not discriminate on the basis of race, creed, sex or national origin. 5. The provisions of this agreement shall run with, burden and bind the DEVELOPER and his successors. The provisions hereof shall be enforceable by appropriate legal action brought by the CITY. In the event legal action is brought to enforce any provision hereof, the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorney's fees together with other legally allowable costs. 6. This agreement shall . be reviewed by the CITY planning commission every 6 months, at which time the applicant or his successor shall be required to demonstrate good faith compliance with the terms of the agreement. If as a result of this review, the commission finds and determines, on the basis of substantial evidence, that the applicant has not complied in good faith with terms or conditions of the agreement, it shall recommend to the city council that the agreement be modified or terminated. If the city council concurs with the planning commission recommendation the agreement shall be modified or terminated. Proceeding before the city council shall be a noticed public hearing. If at the time of the hearings 5 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1133 substantial improvements have not yet occurred on the site, termination Of the AGREEMENT will also involve revocation of all previous approvals and permits associated herewith. If substantial improvements are already in place and modifications acceptable to the CITY cannot be negotiated then enforcement of provisions of this agreement shall be pursued through legal action per No. 6 of this AGREEMENT. 7. The AGREEMENT shall be construed according to the laws of the state of California. If any portion of the AGREEMENT is for any reasons held to be unenforceable, such determination shall not affect the val.idity of the remaining portions. 8. Each of the parties hereto covenants and agrees that it has the legal capacity to make the AGREEMENTS herein contained, that each AGREEMENT is binding upon that party and that this AGREEMENT is executed by a duly authorized official acting in his official capacity. 9. The terms of this agreement shall remain in force as long as the PROJECT remains in existence. 6 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1133 IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have executed this Agreement the year and date first above written. THE CITY OF PALM DESERT By By L & T DEVELOPMENT CO. (Notarized) By ATTEST: SHEILA R. GILLIGAN, City Clerk City of Palm Desert, California /tm 7 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1133 EXHIBIT "I" Legal Description Parcel 1 The east 1/2 of Lot 24 Palma Village Groves per map book 20 page 51 Riverside County. Parcel 2 & 3 The portion of Lot 24 of Palma Village Groves per map book 20 page 51 , Riverside County. 8 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1133 EXHIBIT "2" AFFORDABLE HOUSING INCOME AND RENT SCHEDULE - 1986 Income Rent Lower - $15,000 Lower - $375 9 MINUTES Y PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION APRIL 1 , 1986 Action: Moved by Commissioner Downs, seconded by Commissioner Wood, adopting the findings as presented by staff. Carried 5-0. Moved by Commissioner Downs, seconded by Commissioner Wood, adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 1131 , approving PP 86-10, subject to conditions. Carried 5-0. E. Case Nos.P 86-12 CUP 86-12 and DA 86-2 - L 8 T DEVELOPMENT, Applicant- Request for approval of a negative declaration of environmental impact , precise plan , conditional use permit, and development agreement for a 20 unit senior citizen apartment project on 1 .8 acres within the R-2 senior overlay zone at the southwest corner of Catalina Way and San Carlos Avenue. Mr. Drell outlined the salient points of the staff report and recommended approval . Chairman Crites opened the public testimony and asked if the applicant wished to address the commission. i MR. FRANZ TIRRE, applicant, stated that he has a remodel program that should increase the attractiveness of the neighborhood and discussed the development agreement requirements. - Chairman Crites asked if anyone present wished to speak in FAVOR or OPPOSITION to the proposed. MR. DAN HOYER spoke in favor of the project and asked for and received clarification regarding minimum age and possible conversion to something other than senior housing. Mr. Drell indicated that it would require an amendment to the conditional use permit and stated that the project would have to be physically changed. Chairman Crites closed the public testimony. 9 I I MINUTES y PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION APRIL 1, 1986 Commissioner Richards indicated that this project complied with what had been envisioned for this area. Action: Moved by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner Erwood, adopting the findings as presented by staff. Carried 5-0. Moved by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner Erwood, adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 1132, approving PP 86-12 and CUP 86-12, subject to conditions. Carried 5-0. Moved by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner Erwood, adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 1133, recommending approval of DA 86-2 to city council . Carried 5-0. F. Case Nos. GPA 86-1 , C/Z 86-2 and PP 86-7 - G.K. RANNEY, INC. AND PALM DESERT GARDENS, Applicants Request for approval of a general plan amendment from medium density residential (5-7 du/ac) , date palm preserve to high density residential (7-18 du/ac) , a zone change from open space, natural factors overlay to R-3 (3) (3,000 square foot land area per du) , and a precise plan to allow construction of 468 two story residential units on 39 acres located at the northeast j corner of Fred Waring Drive and Deep Canyon j Road. Mr. Joy outlined the salient points of the staff report and the reasons for the recommendation of denial , noting that only one-eighth of the surrounding property would be compatible with two story development and that the city did not need more rental housing in the city at the present time. It was suggested that a motion for denial be made. After discussion, the attorney recommended that the commission listen to the presentation from the applicant. Chairman Crites opened the public testimony and asked the applicant to address the commission. i MR. ROBERT RICCIARDI , 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane, explained why he was asking for this project and outlined why it would be suitable for the area. He also gave a slide presentation i ! 10 i CITY OF PALM DESERT DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT TO: PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: APRIL 11,, �1986 CASE NOS: P 8�P 6-1CUP 86-12 AND DA 86-2 REQUEST: Approval of a negative declaration of environmental impact, precise, conditional use permit, and development agreement for a 20 unit senior citizen apartment project on 1 .8 acres within the R-2, senior overlay zone at the southwest corner of Catalina Way and San Carlos Avenue. APPLICANT: L 8 T DEVELOPMENT 74-133 E1 Paseo, Suite 9 Palm Desert, CA 92260 1. BACKGROUND: A. ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE: NORTH: R-2 S.O./VACANT SOUTH: R-2 S.O./DUPLEX EAST: R-2 S.O./VACANT WEST: R-2 S.O./MIXED SINGLE FAMILY AND MULTI FAMILY B. PALMA VILLAGE SPECIFIC PLAN DESIGNATION: Senior housing. C. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The project will not generate significant adverse impacts. The Desert Sands Unified School District has informed the city that impact fees would be required if the age 62 limitation was ever removed. A draft negative declaration has been prepared. 1I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Presently 6 older rental units and one single family home exist on the property. The home and five of the rental units will be completely remodeled, one unit will be demolished and 14 additional units will be constructed under the age 62 minimum provisions of the senior overlay. i STAFF REPORT CONTINUED PROJECT DATA Pro ect Ordinance Requirement Project area 1 . 18 acres - Unit mix 5 2 bd 1000 sq. ft. 800 sq. ft. min. 1 1 bd 605 sq. ft. 600 sq. ft. min. 14 studio 631 sq. ft. 450 sq. ft. min. Total units ZO Project Population 29.25 35.4 maximum Intensity Population/acre 24.8 30 maximum Building Height 15 feet 24 feet Interior Setbacks 5' to 15' 5' - 9' Front Setbacks 15 feet 15 feet Parking 30 spaces 20 spaces (17 covered 13 uncovered) Building Coverage 34% 50% maximum Landscaped Open Space 51% - Recreational Amenities 1 swimming pool 1 spa III. ANALYSIS: The proposal complies with all applicable standards of the R-2 and Senior Overlay zones. The project Implements two important goals of the Palma Village Plan: 1) The upgrading of older housing; 2) The construction of new senior housing. The senior overlay requires that 10% of the project be reserved and made affordable by lower income households and 10% by median moderate income households. The applicant has agreed to forgo the moderate income units and provide all 20% (4 units) at the lower income rate. Four large 631 square foot studios would be controlled. Under the existing schedule maximum rents would be $375/month with a maximum income of $15,000/year. The terms of the controls are described in the development agreement and are similar to those of past projects. FINDINGS: 1 . The design of the precise plan and conditional use permit will not depreciate property values in the vicinity. The improvements to existing older development, the development of 14 new units and the senior citizen restrictions will upgrade the area and improve neighborhood appearance. 2 STAFF REPORT CONTINUED 2. The precise plan and conditional use permit will not unreasonably interfere with the use or enjoyment of property int he vicinity nor will it endanger public peace, health, safety or general welfare. Senior housing generates lower impacts than alternative residential uses. 3. The project specifically implements neighborhood improvement, housing rehabilitation, and senior housing goals of the Palm Desert General Plan Housing Element and Palma Village Specific Plan. III. RECOMMENDATION: Approve findings and adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. approving PP 86-12 and CUP 86-12, subject to attached conditions. Adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. recommending approval of DA -2 to city council . IV. ATTACHMENTS: 1 . Draft Resolutions 2. Negative Declaration 3. Legal Notice 4. Maps and Exhibits Prepared by� ,Rs Reviewed and Approved by /tm 3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT, PRECISE PLAN OF DESIGN AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A 20 UNiT SENIOR CITIZEN APARTMENT PROJECT ON 1. 18 ACRES AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF CATALINA WAY AND SAN CARLOS AVENUE. CASE NOS. PP 86-12 AND CUP 86-12 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 1st day of April , 1986, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider the request of L & T DEVELOPMENT CO. for approval of a negative declaration of environmental impact, precise plan and conditional use permit to remodel six existing units and construct 14 additional units under provisions of the Senior Housing Overlay zoning ordinance chapter 25.52. WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedure for implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 80-89," in that the director of community development has determined that the project will not have a significant impact on the environment and a negative declaration has been prepared. WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said planning commission did find the following facts to exist to justify their actions: 1 . The design of the precise plan and conditional use permit will not depreciate property values in the vicinity. The improvements to existing older development, the development of 14 new units and the senior citizen restrictions will upgrade the area and improve neighborhood appearance. 2. The precise plan and conditional use permit will not unreasonably interfere with the use or enjoyment of property int he vicinity nor will it endanger public peace, health, safety or general welfare. Senior housing generates lower impacts than alternative residential uses. 3. The project specifically implements neighborhood improvement, housing rehabilitation, and senior housing goals of the Palm Desert General Plan Housing Element and Palma Village Specific Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1 . That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the commission in this case; 1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2. That approval of Precise Plan/Conditional Use Permit 86-12 is on file in the department of community development is hereby approved for reasons subject to the attached conditions. 3. A negative declaration of environmental impact is hereby approved. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 1st day of April , 1986, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: BUFORD CRITES, Chairman ATTEST: RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary /tm 2 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NOS. PP 86-12 AND CUP 86-12 Department of Community Development: 1. This approval shall be contingent upon approval and execution of DA 86-2. 2. The development of the property shall conform substantially with exhibits on file with the department of community development/planning, as modified by the following conditions. 3. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein which are in addition to all municipal ordinances and state and federal statutes now in force, or which hereafter may be in force. 4. Construction of a portion of said project shall commence within one year from the date of final approval unless an extension of time is granted; otherwise said approval shall become null , void and of no effect whatsoever. 5. Prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contemplated by this approval , the applicant shall first obtain permits and/or clearance from the following agencies: Palm Desert Architectural Commission Coachella Valley Water District Riverside County Department of Health City Fire Marshal Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to the department of building and safety at the time of issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. 6. Trash provisions shall be approved by applicable trash company and city prior to issuance of building permit. 7. The minimum age for project occupant shall be 62. 8. Project sponsor must post a maintenance bond, letter of credit or cash deposit for the life of the project equivalent to 25% of the annual maintenance budget for the project, plus reserves for major repair and replacement. 9. If project is ever converted to standard family housing, all requirements of the base R-2 zone would have to be met in addition to payment of $628/unit school impact mitigation fees to the Desert Sands Unified School District. 3 PLANNING COMMISSION REbULUTiON NO. Department of Public Works: 1. Drainage and signalization fund fees, as required by city ordinance, shall be paid prior to grading permit issuance. 2. Storm drain construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study by the private engineer that is approved by the department of public works. 3. Full public improvements, including traffic safety lighting as required by ordinance and the director of public works, shall be installed in accordance with city standards. 4. Improvement plans for water and sewer systems shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the city engineer for checking and approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. The engineer shall submit "as built" plans prior to the acceptance of the improvements by the city, 5. Complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the city engineer for checking and approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. The engineer shall submit "as-built" plans submitted to the department of public works prior to the project final . 6. All private driveways and parking lots shall be inspected by the engineering department and a standard inspection fee shall be paid prior to grading permit issuance. 7. Landscaping maintenance on Catalina Way and San Carlos Avenue shall be provided by the property owner. 8. Complete grading plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the city engineer for checking and approval prior to issuance of any permits. 9. Dedication of five feet of right-of-way on Catalina Way shall be done prior to issuance of any permits and approval of plans. 10. installation of six foot sidewalk on Catalina Way and San Carlos Avenue. 11 . Close unused driveway with full height curb and gutter. 12. Offsite improvement plans to be approved by public works department and a surety posted to guarantee the required offsite improvements prior to grading permit issuance. 13. Installation of sewers to serve this project. 4 �I PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14. Size, number and location of driveways to public works specifications with only three (3) driveway approaches to be allowed to serve this property. 15. Any permit issuance shall be subject to the waiver of parcel map first being approved and recorded. Fire Marshal: 1. install a water system capable of delivering 2500 GPM fire flow from any fire hydrant for a two hour duration in addition to domestic supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement. Fire flow requirements will depend on built-in fire protection provisions of buildings. 2. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants so that no point of any building is more than 250 feet from a fire hydrant measured along approved vehicular travel ways. a. exterior surfaces of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow, and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. b. curbs shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. C. hydrants shall not be located closer than 25 feet to any building. 3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and two copies of the water system plan to the fire marshal for review. Upon approval , one copy will be sent to the building department, and the original will be returned to the developer. 4. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and approved by the water company, with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system in Case No. PP 86-12 is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the fire marshal ." 5. Prior to delivery of combustible materials to the building site, the required water system shall be installed, operating, and delivering the required flow. 6. Additional fire protection requirements may be necessary when the applicant submits specific plans for consideration and approval . 7. Provide sprinkler system or standpipe for all areas beyond I50' of vehicular access. 5 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT RELATING TO LOWER INCOME RENTAL CONTROL FOR A 20 UNIT SENIOR CITIZEN APARTMENT PROJECT LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF CATALINA WAY AND SAN CARLOS AVENUE. CASE NO. DA 86-2 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the .Ist day of April , 1986, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider the request of L 8 T DEVELOPMENT CO. for approval of a development agreement relating to the affordable housing requirements for a 20 unit conventional senior housing project on the southwest corner of Catalina Way and San Carlos Avenue. WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said planning commission did find the following facts and reasons to exist to justify their actions: 1 . The proposed development agreement satisfies the intent and purpose of the Senior Housing Overlay and the General Plan Housing Element. 2. The development furthers the general welfare by requiring the construction of needed senior housing affordable by low and moderate Income senior citizen households. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the commission in this case; 2. That approval of DA 86-2 Exhibit "A" is hereby recommended to the city council . PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this Ist day of April , 1986, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: BUFORD CRITES, Chairman ATTEST: RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. EXHIBIT "A" L 8 T 'DEVELOPMENT COMPANY AFFORDABLE SENIOR HOUSING DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT This agreement, made as of this _ day of , 1986 between the City of Palm Desert, a California municipal corporation (hereinafter "CITY") and L 8 T Development Co. , (hereinafter "DEVELOPER") provides: Recitals 1 . DEVELOPER is owner of certain real property located within the City of Palm Desert, California, which property is described in Exhibit 1 , attached hereto and made a part hereof (hereinafter "PROPERTY"). DEVELOPER has applied for and been granted approval of a precise plan/conditional use permit (PP/CUP 86-12) to construct 20 conventional senior housing units on the PROPERTY. 2. As a condition of said approval , CITY and DEVELOPER have agreed that 20% of units associated with the project be set aside for lower Income occupants subject to restrictions necessary to insure the continued occupancy of said units by lower income senior citizen households. These units shall hereafter be referred to as "AFFORDABLE SENIOR UNITS." 2 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3. DEVELOPER and CITY desire to further memorialize and implement the conditions of said approval and do hereby agree to the following terms and conditions. 4. As used herein, the following terms shall be defined as: A. SENIOR CITIZEN HOUSEHOLD - Maximum two person household of which one member is 62 years of age or older. B. CONVENTIONAL SENIOR HOUSING - Rental or ownership units designed and restricted to healthy ambulatory senior citizens who remain capable of performing most activities associated with Independent daily life. Other than having smaller units and possessing design features and recreational amenities more compatible with a less active lifestyle conventional senior housing resembles standard housing. C. LOWER INCOME SENIOR CITIZEN HOUSEHOLD - Senior Citizen Households whose gross income does not exceed 80% of the median Income for a one person household for Riverside County based . upon financial and demographic data received from the United States Department of Housing and Community Development (HUD) or its successor agency. This information is included in Exhibit 112" and shall be up dated automatically as current data 3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. Exhibit "2" and shall be up dated automatically as current data is obtained from HUD. If in the future, more relevant data is made available specifically applicable to senior citizens by (HUD) or other officially recognized agencies, such data shall become the basis of this agreement. Agreement 1 . DEVELOPER has been conditionally granted permission by the CITY to construct 20 rental conventional senior housing units on the PROPERTY by Precise Plan/Conditional Use Permit 86-12 Planning Commission Resolution No. As a condition of said approval DEVELOPER hereby agrees to reserve and make affordable four studio units for lower income senior citizen households. 2. Monthly rents for the AFFORDABLE SENIOR UNITS shall not exceed 30% of the maximum gross monthly income as shown for lower income households in Exhibit 112". 3. The DEVELOPER or his assigned management agent shall be responsible for determining eligibility of prospective tenants. Prior to opening the project the DEVELOPER shall submit for approval a plan to the CITY describing the procedure for determining and enforcing eligibility requirements. This plan shall Include annual qualification by all 4 PLANNING COMMISSION .REbOLUTION NO. CITY or its assigned agents determining compliance with all aspects of this agreement. 4. The DEVELOPER shall not discriminate on the basis of race, creed, sex or national origin. 5. The provisions of this agreement shall run with, burden and bind the DEVELOPER and his successors. The provisions hereof shall be enforceable by appropriate legal action brought by the CITY. In the event legal action is brought to enforce any provision hereof, the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorney's fees together with other legally allowable costs. 6. This agreement shall be reviewed by the CITY planning commission every 6 months, at which time the applicant or his successor shall be required to demonstrate good faith compliance with the terms of the agreement. If as a result of this review, the commission finds and determines, on the basis of substantial evidence, that the applicant has not complied in good faith with terms or conditions of the agreement, it shall recommend to the city council that the agreement be modified or terminated. If the city council concurs with the planning commission recommendation the agreement shall be modified or terminated. Proceeding before the city council shall be a noticed public hearing. If at the time of the hearings substantial improvements have not yet occurred on the site, termination 5 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. of the AGREEMENT will also involve revocation of all previous approvals and permits associated herewith. If substantial improvements are already In place and modifications acceptable to the CITY cannot be negotiated then enforcement of provisions of this agreement shall be pursued through legal action per No. 6 of this AGREEMENT. 7. The AGREEMENT shall be construed according to the laws of the State of California. If any portion of the AGREEMENT is for any reasons held to be unenforceable, such determination shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions. 8. Each of the parties hereto covenants and agrees that it has the legal capacity to make the AGREEMENTS herein contained, that each AGREEMENT is binding upon that party and that this AGREEMENT is executed by a duly authorized official acting in his official capacity. 9. The terms of this agreement shall remain in force as long as the PROJECT remains in existence. 6 PLANNING COMMISSION RP-AkUTION NO. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have executed this Agreement the year and date first above written. THE CITY OF PALM DESERT By By L 8 T 'OEVELOPMENT CO. (Notarized) By ATTEST: SHEILA R. GILLIGAN, City Clerk City of Palm Desert, California /tm 7 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. EXHIBIT "1" Legal Description Parcel 1 The east 1/2 of Lot 24 Palma Village Groves per map book 20 page 51 Riverside County. Parcel 2 8 3 The portion of Lot 24 of Palma Village Groves per map book 20 page 51 , Riverside County. 8 PLANNING COMMISSION RE�#LUTION NO. EXHIBIT "2" AFFORDABLE HOUSING INCOME AND RENT.SCHEDULE - 1986 Income Rent Lower - $15,000 Lower - $375 9 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 Pursuant to Title 14, Division 6, Article 7, Section 15083, of the California Administrative Code. NEGATIVE DECLARATION CASE NOS: PP 86-12, CUP 86-12 and DA 86-2 APPLICANT/PROJECT SPONSOR: L 9 T DEVELOPMENT, 74-133 El Paseo, Suite 9, Palm Desert, CA 92260. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/LOCATION: 20 unit senior citizen apartment project on 1.8 acres within the R-2 senior overly zone at the southwest corner of Catalina Way and San Carlos Avenue. The Director of the Department of Community Development, City of Palm Desert, California, has found that the described project will not have a significant effect on the environment. A copy of the Initial Study has been attached to document the reasons in support of this finding. Mitigation measures, if any, included in the project to avoid potentially significant effects, may also be found attached. ---------------------------------------- RAMON A. DIAZ DATE DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT /tm CASE NO. ENVI$ONITENTAL SERVICES DEPT. INITIAL STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION CHECKLIST NOTE: The availability of data necessary to address the topics listed below shall form the basis of a decision as to whether the application is considered complete for purposes of environmental assessment. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers, possible mitigation measures and comments are provided on attached sheets). Yes Maybe No 1 . Earth. Will the proposal result in: , — a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? - b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction, or overcovering of the soil? c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? d. The destruction, covering, or modification — of any unique geologic or physical features? e. . Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors? r c. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? 2. Yes Maybe No 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: a;,..Changes in currents, �or the course or direction of water movements? b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? d. Alteration of-the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? v e.. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or with- drawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? ✓ f. Reduction in the amount of water other- wise available for public water supplies? c� 4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or . numbers of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, and crops)? [/ b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or endangered species of plants? — — c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? _r( 5. ' Animal. Life. Will the proposal 'result in: a. Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, . land animals including reptiles, or _. insects)? (� b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or endangered species of animals? _ ®� c. Introduction of new species of animals . into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d Deterioration to existing wildlife habitat? - . 4 - i 3. Yes Mbe No 6. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in .-:the rate of use of any natural resources? b. Depletion of=any non-renewable natural resource? — — v 7. Energy. Will theproposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? b. Demand upon existing sources of energy, or re- quire the.deselopment of new sources of energy? 8. .Risk of Upset:tAoes the proposal involve a = . risk of an explosion or the release of . hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, pesticides , oil , chemicals, or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? -c -- — 9. Economic Loss. Will the proposal result in: a. A change in the value of property and improvements t endangered by flooding? — — — b. A change in the value of property and improvementsrexposed to geologic hazards beyond accepted community risk standards? ✓ 10. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels toe;the point at which accepted community noise and vibration levels are exceeded? a — 11. Land Use. Willethe proposal result in the a er ttation of the present developed or planned land use of an area? 12. Open Space. Will the proposal lead to a _ _ decrease in theramount of designated open space? — — 13. Population. Will the proposal result in: a. Alteration of�' the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human --- population of' the City? - (/ b. Change in the population distribution by age, income,-religion, racial , or ethnic h, group, occupational class , household type? — 4. Yes Maybe No 14. Emoloyment. Will the proposal result in additional new long-term jobs provided, or a change in the number and per cent employed, unemployed, and underemployed? e/ 15. Housing. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in number and per cent of housing units by type (price or rent range, zoning category, owner-occupied and rental , etc. ) relative to demand or to number of families in various income classes in the City? v b. Impacts on existing housing or creation of a demand for additional housing? 11, Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a. Generation of additional vehicular movement? r/ b. Effects on existing parking facilities , or demand for new parking? c. Impact upon existing transportation systems? — d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? e. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists, or pedestrians? t/ 17. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for, new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? ✓ b. Police protection? r/ c. Schools? d. Parks or other recreational facilities? ✓ e. Maintenance of public facilities, including ✓ roads? f. Other governmental services? _ . \ ` 5. Yes Maybe No 18. Public Fiscal Balance. Will the proposal result in a net change in government fiscal flow (revenues less operating expenditures and annualized capital expenditures)? ✓ 19. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? — — ✓ b. Communications system? c. Water? d. Sewer or septic tanks? ✓ e. Storm water drainage? v f. Solid waste and disposal? 20. Human Health. Will the proposal result in: a. The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? ✓ b. A change in the level Of community health care provided? 21. Social Services. Will the proposal result in an increased denand for provision of general _ social services? 22. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in: a. Obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public? b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? c. Lessening of the overall neighborhood . (or area) attractiveness, pleasantness, and uniqueness? 23.' Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce V new light or glare? _ 24. Archeolo ical/Historical . Will the proposal resu t to an a te—T ration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, / object, or building? t/ 6. Yes nL e No 25. Mandatory Findings of Significance. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment or to curtail the diversity in the environment? b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future. ).. c. Does the project have impacts which are indi- vidually limited, but cumulatively considerable? - (A project may impact on two or-more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small , but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant. ) d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings , either directly or indirectly? _ _ Initial Study Prepared B I 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE CASE NO. PP 86-12 and DA 86-2 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by TIRRE/LIPPMAN for approval A a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact, Precise Plan and Development Agreement for a 20 unit senior citizen apartment project on 1.8 acres at the 3,uthwe5t corner of Catalina Way and San Carlos Avenue, more particularly described as: - ARM 627-113-008, 009 8 010 111 -1 , 1 F URANCHO R Ti; = RI 3 tormerly 44th Al IY I Q u SANTA OSA '+ s _ z u _ o w 3 _ E N D S. _ E STIF .O. R- S P A Y S. CATA LINA ;; Ay o L m S.0 a w - a � Z 2 � W I 2 p ?-2 (5) R-2(5) 181p00 ? 14,00 _ ,y �. q_1 — C4 a v Qr N � SAID public hearing will beheld on Tuesday. April i. 1986 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber at the Palm Desert City Hall, 73-510 Fred .Waring Drive. Palm Desert. California, at which time and place all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. If you challenge the proposed actions in court. you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described In this notice, or In written rnrrespondence delivered to the city council for planning commission) at, or prior to, the public hearing. PDDLISH: Desert Post RAMON A. DIAZ. Secretary March 21, 1986 Palm Desert Planning Commission PROOF OF E I >t.aCAT10N ;1 I This space Is for , _ +County Clerk's Filing Stamp , U (2015.5 C.(�.P.) STATE OF CALIFORNIA, 1VAIR 2 4 1986 County of Riverside COMMUMTY SERV;CES DEPARTMENT CITY OF PALM DESERTY Q; p:gLP1 Dc'SE!P 1 1 am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to Proof of Publication of or interested in the above entitled matter. I CASE NO . PP 86-12 and DA 86-2 am the principal clerk of the printer of the ••••••••••••................................ "..... ' DESERTPOST............................ ............................ _ CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE CASE NO.PP 86-12 and DA 862 ................................................ NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held before the a newspaper of general.circulation, printed Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by ` TIRREILIPPMAN for approval of a Negative Declaration of Enviranmerr, , B i.week 1 y '.' tal Impost,Precise Plan and Development Agreement.for a 20 unit seen- and published ...... ......................... ior citizen apartment,project on 1.8 acres at the southwest comer Of 'Catalina Way and San Carics Avenue,more particularly described as 'APN 627-113-008.009&010 in the City Of ...P.altn•.Dose L•t••••........• SAID public hearing will be held on Tuesday.April 1,1986 at 7:00 p.m. y In the Council Chamber In the Palm Desert City Hall,73-510 Fred War- County tY Of Riverside, and which news. -Ing Drive,Palm Desert.California.atwhich it"and place an interested _ paper has been adjudged a newspaper persons are invited to attend and be heard ityou challenge the prwos- of general circulation by the Superior ad actions In court,you may be limited to raising Doty those Issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice,or Court of the County of Riverside, State Of 1n written correspondence delivered to the city council(or planning commission)at.at,'or prior to,the public hearing. - ' 19 RAMON A.DIAZ Secretary California,under thedateof•10 Palm/5 64 , f Desert PlanningCanmisson s .',(Pup D.P.Mar.21 1986) Case Number .$3658.....•; thai the notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpareil), has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: 3/21 .................................................... all in the year 19.8.6.. 1 certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Datedat.... ................ California,this.2lst .dayof.Mar . 1986 S' rat re Fr"coplee al In16 0Ishe form may De secarod from t CALIFORNIA NEWSPAPER SERVICE BUREAU, INC. Legal Advertising Clearing House 120 West Second St., Los Angeles, Calif. 90012 Telephone: (213) 625.2541 PI#6"reaYeel O E If L■AL Proef of Publication when"4141101e DUe farm. ' ) ? RIVERSIDE COUNTY 4 pi CALI,os FIREDEPARTMENT 1_ _ • [t ' IN COOPERATION WITH THE ,�A$ (']'T) _n} CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY a RAY HEBRARD y4r�FMr of °per FIRE . WILWE,ST SAN JACINTO AVENUE /�aRcHil'Q �-`_ )(. _i' �_ p�PERRIS,CALIFORNIA92370 Raymon Diaz r TELEPHONE:(714)657.3183 r. '� Planning and Community iri h 1986 Development Director 73510 Fred Waring C0Mh,;uvrrY $rIl i-r oeva.r•.TrlE;,rr Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 CITY o< P.d.rs DE"!R Reference: PP $6-(2 Applicant: LAT OEVFLQPAIFUt Dear Mr. Ramon Diaz The following fire protection requirements are in accordance with the Uniform Fire Code and Life Safety Code standards. 1 . Install a water system capable of delivering 25opGPM fire flow from any fire hydrant for a 2 hour duration in addition to domestic supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement. Fire flow require- ments will depend on built-in fire protection provisions of buildings. 2. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants so that no point of any building is more than 250 feet from a fire hydrant measured along approved vehicular travel ways. a. exterior surface of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow, and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. b. curbs shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. c. hydrants shall not be located closer than 2- feet to any building. 3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and three copies of the water system plan to the Fire Marshal for review. Upon approval , one copy will .be sent to the Building Department and the original will be returned to the developer. 4. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and approved by the water company with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system in PP S6-12 is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Fire Marshal ." S. Prior to delivery of combustible materials to the building site, the required water system shall be installed, operating and delivering the required flow. 6. Additional fire protection requirements may be necessary when the applicant submits specific plans for consideration and approval . 7. All buildings over * square feet require an approved fire sprinkler system. 8. Provide sprinkler system or standpipe for all areas beyond 150' of vehicular access. Very truly yours , RAY HEBRARD �Fire Chief BY, � MIKE MCCONNELL Fire Marshal F R _ r ' 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 March 14, 1986 CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE CASE NO. PP 86-12 and DA 86-2 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by TIRRE/LIPPMAN for approval of a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact, Precise Plan and Development Agreement for a 20 unit senior citizen apartment project on 1 .8 acres at the southwest corner of Catalina Way and San Carlos Avenue, more particularly described as: APN 627-113-008, 009 & 010 .'�,7txt= ut{L- L+I RANCHO R r- � IL R-t ! a v i 3 -tormeFly 44th J C 1Y a � w SAM1 'A O SATTTI i a � H = 3 o z w o w E N U E < _ a ,6. i S.O. R- S P 1 A Y I s' I _C.ATALINA ajAl' I o ' J E m Q L. aZ Z 2 W !Al M GRIvE 18 000 I 0 2 2 (5): R•2(5) z �, 7,--- Q Co 1 w 14— Z Q z - N a •`. , __( > �+ ri I �1> _ SAID public hearing will beheld on Tuesday, April 1 . 1986 at 7:00 p.m. In the Council Chamber at the Palm Desert City Hall , 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. If you challenge the proposed actions in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the city council (or planning commission) at, or prior to, the public hearing. PUBLISH: Desert Post RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary March 21 , 1986 Palm Desert Planning Commission CASE NO. Environmental Assessment Form TO THE APPLICANT: Your cooperation in completing this form and supplying the information requested will expedite City review of your application pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. The City is required to make an environmental assessment on all projects which it exercises discretionary approval over. Applications submitted will not be considered complete until all information necessary to make the environmental assessment is complete. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1 . Name, address , and telephone number of owner, applicant or project sponsor: T D1-vj-1QpmQnt Company ( 619 ) 568 5808 74-133 F1 PaSeQ S ,i -Q 9 , Palm Desert CA 92260 2. Name, address and telephone number of person to be contacted 'con- cerning the project (such as architect, engineer, or other repre- sentative) :Fran7 Tir- ( 619 ) 568-5808 Z,g7 Z Z3—I{ 74-133 F1 Paseo Suite 9 Palm Desert CA 92260 3. Common name of project (if any) : none 4. Project location (street address or general location) : 44-401 San Carlos 44-431 San Can Carlos - 73-625 Catalina Palm Desert CA 5. Precise legal description of property (lot and tract number, or meets & bounds) :Parcel 1 The east 15 of Lot 24 of Lot 24 Palma Village Groves as per map recorded in Book 20 page 51 of Maps , Riverside County. Parcel 2 That portion of Lot 24 of Palma Villagg Groves in the City of Palm Desert, County of RiverSide,CA, as per map recorded in bcnk 20 pg. 51 of Maps Parcel 3 That portion of Lot 24 Palma Village Groves, Map book 20, Page 51 Maps of Riverside County CA 6. Proposed use of the site (project for which the form is filed; describe the total undertaking, not just the current application approval being sought) : To upgrade existing 7 units ( ex eror) and add additional units as allowed by Senior Overlay Density. Number of units existing old and new 20 7. Relationship to a larger project or series of projects (describe how this project relates to other activities , phases, and develop- ments planned, or now underway) : nnno - rela;-eg + seniors who will have Senior Center Ct facilities nacross fthe rPef fr gnhiprt- Pr + 8. List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, to .go foriard, including those required by the City, Regional , State and Federal agencies (indicate sub- sequent approval agency name, and type of approval required) : none other than agreement with city to rent a percentage of the units-al t nntrolled rpnt (affordable ) I EXISTING CONDITIONS• 9. aroject site area: 51 _ ��R 8� sn f + (Size of property in sq: ft. or acreage) 10. Present zoning: R 2-s-0 (Proposed zoning) : camp 11 . General Plan land use designation: Mult; -Fam; lv xes; rl n ; 1 12. Existing use of the project site: SF and Ma 13. Existing use on adjacent properties : (Example - North, Shopping Center; South, Single Family Dwellings; East, Vacant, etc. ). North, vacant; South, Single family; East vacant; West, apartments (multipule) 14. Site topography (describe) :_flat to gently flowing to nerlmeter ( street-s 15. Are there any natural or manmade drainage channels through or adjacent to the property? NO x YES 16. Grading (estimate number of cubic yards of dirt being moved) : 50 -100 yds . 17. List the number, size and type of trees being removed: ( 2 ) largp Palms ( 7 ) dead grapefruit; ( 9 ) living grapefruit, mature (relocate 1801 of tra remnval both a livingead and et visual. ) 18. Describe any cultural , historic, or scenic aspects of the project site: ( nnnp) As the site existspresently it is extremely ugly which ugly street appearance is the most outstanding teat r 19. Residential Project (if not residential do NOT answer) A. Number and type of dwelling units (Specify no. of bedrooms) : ( 51 2-Radronm• ( 1 ) 1 -Redrnnm Qlait ( 14 ) 4 di ni S B. Schedule of unit S1Ze5 : 9-RPdronmc 1000 co ft 1 Radroom unit- 605 an- ft St-''din ni.:L . 631 f+ C. Number of stories 1 Height 15 feet. D. Largest single building (sq. ft. ) 312n (hgt. ) 15 E. Type of household size expected (population projection for the project) : SinalPc and on�lpc ( ra ) F. Describe the number and type of recreational facilities: Swir,minrt_nnnl and ana • landau ppd walkwaYs G. Is there any night lighting of the project: the front-of each unit H. Range of sales prices or rents : $ 380/month to $ 525/month I. Percent of total project devoted to: Building . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 . 4 Paving, including streets. . . . . . . . . . . 14 . 3 % Landscaping, Open, Recreation Area . . . . . . . 51 . 3 % Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects : Discuss below all items checked yes (attach additional sheets as necessary) . YES NO 21 . Change in existing features of hillsides, or substantial alteration of ground. contours. X 22. Change in the dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in the project vicinity. X 23. Subject to or resulting in soil errosion by wind or flooding. X 24. Change in ground water quality or quantity, or alteration of existing drainage patterns. X 25. Change in existing noise or vibration level in the vicinity. Subject to roadway or airport noise (has the required acoustical report been submitted?) X 26. Involves the use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives. x_ 27. Involves the use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy. X 28. Changes the demand for municipal services (police, fire, sewage, etc. ) X 29. Changes the demand for utility services , beyond those presently available or planned in the near future. x 30. Significantly affects any unique or natural features, including mature trees. X 31 . Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or public land or public roads. X 32. Results in the dislocation of people. r YES NO 33. Generates controversy based on aesthetics or other features of the project. X [ ] Additional explanation of "ves" answers attached. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that. the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation, to the best of m ability, y a slit,/, and that the facts , statements and informat ion presented are true and correct to the be st of my,knowledge and belief. Ti rrp i.i PPman Name Print or Type For r - ate ) igna re ate INITIAL STUDY FEE: $30. 00 (Make check payable to the City of Palm Desert and sub- mit with this form. ) ^ INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Z�(� C�) �)S FROM : DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS IdiNi� �� 1986 SUBJECT: . PP 0Fi-12 r,U*,1Mura!`i'v ;E!zv!i:Er) o{ y,aTr,; 'dr CITY of rA!.!a 0 1;:_a DATE: MRKGN 3I (Gf86 The following should be considered conditions of approval : © Drainage and signalization fund fees , as required by City ordinance , ' shall be paid prior to (r.@G9,-4a+ 18_ Of (bull iRg permit issuance) . gqradi rr�� 2 ) Drainage faciTitie� shall be provided , per Ordinance No. 218 and the Master Drainage Plan, to the specifications of the Director of Public Works . 3� Storm drain construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study by the private engineer that is approved by the Department of Public Works . Full public Improvements , including traffic safety lighting, as required by ordinance and the Director of Public Works , shall be installed In accordance with City standards. OS Improvement plans for water and sewer systems shall be approved by the respective service districts with "as-built" plans submitted to the Department of Public Works prior to the project final . © Complete Improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted , as required by ordinance, to the City Engineer . for checking and approval before construction of any Improvements is commenced. The engineer shall submit "as-built" plans prior to the acceptance of the improvements by the City. olrn V V W aYS a,.ir��: fotr h¢ : 77 All pr i vaten+==-== shall e n ected by the engineering. , department and a standard Inspection fee shall be paid prior to permit is- suance) . 9radl 8� b Landscaping maintenance on ue- S� a l I ee provided by the ( ) (property owner). 9) Existing utilities on shall be underground- ed per each respective utility district' s recommendation. , 10 ) Traffic safety striping on shall be provided to the specifications of the Director of Public Works . A. traffic control plan must be submitted to and approved by , the Director of Public Works before placing pavement markings . 11 Complete grading plans and specifications shall be submit- ted , as required by ordinance , to the City Engineer for checking and approval prior to issuance of any permits . . l2 Dedication of �!ry feet of right-of-way on C �+al�r�a shal I be done prior to issuance of any permits and approval of plans . Installation of eweb -"a -gutter sidewalk on Ga-r- (ivla gk 4 Sa.. ca jay 6Ve.A LZ, 14) Waiver of access to except at approved locations shall be granted on the final map. J 15 ) Close unused driveway with full heighth curb and gutter .' .. © Offsite improvement; plans to be approved by Public Works !: Department and a surety posted to guarantee the required ! ; offsite Improvements prior to inapW permit issuance) . 17) FA imprdvement of interior streets based on (60' residen- tial ) (private) ( industrial ) street standards as established in accordance with Chapter 26, Section 26 . 40 . 040 , C .P.D. : Code . 'I 18) Installation of one-half landscaped median in or cash payment for one-half the cost of landscaped median ;. ; at the option of the Director of Public Works . 19 ) Traffic analysis to be prepared for the project to address the specific Impacts on existing networks (street and ' Intersections ) and the proposed mitigation measures recom- mended for approval by the City. 20 lnstallation of sewers to serve this project . 21 Size, number and location of driveways to Public Works 1 specifications with only fir=, driveway approach (es ) .to be allowed to serve this property. 22) No (new) requirements . (Original conditions apply) ®3 Any permit issuance shall be subject to the waiver of parcel map first being approved and recorded. 24 ) Complete (parcel ) (tract) map( s ) shall be submitted as required by ordinance to the City Engineer for checking and approval and be recorded before issuance of certificate of . occupancy by the Building Department . Richard J olkers , P.E . RA/RJF i ' . I ; iyi Palm a21e-derf Water & Services 2)i3trict 44.500 PORTOLA AVENUE BOX 161 PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92261 BOARD OF DIRECTORS: Phone:(619)346-6338 ROBERT C. H. LAWMAN, President jPi �! {� (A R. CLAIR McDONOUGH v4C..IG �/�_y( V'T 5� SHARON K. EPPS V�•b V l March 7, 1986 MAR j I JJJ PHYLLIS GRIGGS, District Secretary 1986 COMMUNITY SE CITY UE ALIW DESERT TMENT Mr. Ramon Diaz Director, Environmental Services City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, California 92260 Re: Case No. PP 86-12 L & T Development Co. , 20-Unit Senior Citizen Apartment Complex Lot 24 of Palma Village Groves San Carlos Avenue south of Catalina Way Dear Mr. Diaz: In response to your letter regarding the above referenced project, we would like to make the following comments: 1 . The property is within the existing boundary of the Palm Desert Water and Services District. 2. The District will provide domestic water service to the property. 3. Frontage fee of $15.00 per foot will be imposed along San Carlos Avenue. 4. The existing water meters may be utilized. However, in addition, the District will install one lz-inch water meter and 1-inch water meter at a cost of $1 ,350.00 and $650.00 respectively. 5. The water service installation charges will be as follows: One lz-inch water meter @ $1 ,350.00 $1 ,350.00 One 1-inch water meter @ $650.00 650.00 Frontage Fee for 196 feet @ $15.00 /ft 2,940.00 Total $4,940.00 6. An approved 1z-inch backflow prevention device must be installed as part of the plumbing. Mr. Ramon Diaz March 7, 1986 Page Two 7. All fees and meter installation charges must be paid before the installation work will begin. 8. At least one week advance notice should be given. 9. The plan indicates that certain improvements are to be located over our existing water main along the southerly property line. The owner shall execute an agreement that provides that if at any time in the future the water main requires repair, the owner shall pay for all costs related to the repair including removal and replacement of the improvements in the vicinity of the required repair. 10. There are existing fire hydrants located on Catalina Way at the northeast corner of the site and on San Carlos Avenue near the southeast corner of the site. The addition of any new fire hydrants or the relocation would be completed at an additional cost to be determined upon request. All costs would be paid for by the developer. 11 . A fire sprinkler service connection, if fire sprinklers are required by the City Fire Marshall , would be completed at additional charges and conditions to be determined upon request and according to the District's standards, at the developer's expense. If you have any questions in regard to the above, please contact us. Very truly yours, Robert C. H. Lawman, President cc: Mainiero, Smith and Associates, Inc. d.. - 73-510 Fred Waring Dr., Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 PRECISE PLAN i APIPUCA7(CH FCFaH : Dept.of Planning and Community Development Ti re/Lippman Applicant (please print) 74 133 El Paseo, 'c1 ' '-e 9 568-5808 Telephone Mailing Address Palm Dese:_t, CA 92260 City State Zi P-Coca REQUEST: (Describe specific nature of approval requested). To uiDqjrede ex' tiny 7 units and add additional units as allowed by SPnin- Overlay Density Number of units existing units old and new. 20 units SEE ATTACHED FOR COMPLETE PROPERTY DISCRIPTION. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: 44-401 San Carlos - 44-431 San Carlos - 73-625 Catalina, Palm Desert, CA 92260 PARCEL 1 The East h of Lot 24 of Lot 24 Palma Village Groves as per map Z.Ava Tn Boor. 20 paqe of of maps, or rNe _nun Recoraer of said County. PARCEL 2 That portion of Lot 24 of Palma Village Groves, in the City of Palm Desert County of Riverside, State of CA, as per map recorded in Book 201 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 627-113-008-8 627-113-010-9 627-113-009-9 EXISTING ZONING R -2 Multi ul Property owner Authorization The undemigned states mat may are the owner is) of the property described herein and hereby give author- iz for the filing of this application. lure Dat Agreement absolving the City of palm Oesert of all oil es rewtive to any dsea restrictions. 1 DO SY MY SIGN ATUR IS AGREEMENT, Absolve the City of palm Desert of all liabilities regarding any deed restrictions that my be appticable to the property described herein. Signatur Date Applicants Signature S)gna re Dare - ' (FOR STAFF USE ONLY) Environmental Status. Accepted by: ❑ Ministerial Act E.A. No. � (2'� MM /r��/,/�) }�7�� ❑ Categorical Exemption casF. HOD. /'7 ' 6 l ❑ Negative Declaration ^ 7�ti1� ❑ Other Reference Case No. Y rrweasrexru suwcai�m a-:r-et / Property Discription continued: page 51 of Maps, described as follows: PARCEL That portion of Lot 24, Palma Village Groves, as per map in Book 20 Page 51 Maps of Riverside County, CAlifornia. r;� EXHIBIT A PARCEL 1 The East 1/2 of Lot 24 of Lot 24 of Palma Village Groves as per map recorded in Book 20 page 51 of Maps, in the office of the County Recorder of said County. EXCEPTING therefrom that portion described as follows: BEGINNING at the Northeasterly corner of said Lot 24; THENCE Westerly, along the Northerly line of said Lot, 118 feet; THENCE Southerly and parallel with the Easterly line of said Lot, 98 feet; THENCE Easterly and parallel with the Northerly line of said Lot, 118 feet to the Easterly line thereof; THENCE Northerly along the Easterly line of said Lot, 98 feet to the point of beginning. ALSO EXCEPTING that portion described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the Easterly line of said Lot 24, distant Southerly thereon 98 feet from the Northeasterly corner thereof; THENCE Westerly and parallel with the Northerly line of said Lot, 118 feet; THENCE Southerly and parallel with the Easterly line of said Lot 98 feet; THENCE Easterly and parallel with the Northerly line of said Lot, 118 feet to the Easterly line thereof; THENCE Northerly, along the Easterly line of said Lot, 98 feet to the point of beginning. ALSO EXCEPTING that portion described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the Easterly line of said Lot 24, distant Southerly thereon, 196 feet from the Northeasterly corner thereof; THENCE Westerly and parallel with the Northerly line of said Lot, 118 feet; THENCE Southerly and parallel with the Easterly line of said Lot, 86.15 feet to the Southerly line thereof; THENCE Easterly along the Southerly line of said Lot, 118 feet to the Southerly corner thereof; THENCE Northerly along the Easterly line of said Lot, 86.15 feet to the point of. beginning. PARCEL 2 That portion of Lot 24 of Palma Village Groves, in the City of Palm Desert, County of Riverside, State of California, as per map recorded in Book 20 page 51 of Maps, described as follows: BEGINNING at the Northeasterly corner of said Lot 24; THENCE Westerly, on the Northerly line of said Lot, 118.00 feet; THENCE Southerly and parallel with the Easterly line of said lot, 98.00 feet; THENCE Easterly and parallel with the Northerly line of said lot, 118.00 feet of the Easterly line thereof; THENCE Northerly on the Easterly line of said lot 98.00 feet to the point of beginning. a EXHIBIT A (continued) PARCEL 3 That portion of Lot 24, Palma Village Groves, as per map in Book 20, Page 51 Maps of Riverside County, California, described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on Easterly line of aaid Lot 24, distant Southerly thereon 98 feet from Northeasterly corner thereof; THENCE Westerly and parallel with the Northerly line of said Lot 118 feet; THENCE Southerly and parallel with the Easterly line of said Lot 98 feet; THENCE Easterly and parallel with the Northerly line of said lot 118 feet to Easterly line thereof; THENCE Northerly along Easterly line of said Lot 98 feet to point of beginning. OTAVON CORPORATION BUILDERS-DEVELOPERS-R.E.SALES 80-899 INDIO BLVD. INDIO,CA 92201 PK 619-347-4223 FAX.619-342-5212 July 20, 1992 CITY OF PALM DESERT SENIOR PLANNER MR. PHIL DRELL SUBJECT: 73-625 Catalina Way, #21, Palm Desert, CA Dear Phil: Per our telephone conversation this date please be advised that Unit #21 , will be remodeled to conform to the recently completed new units, commencing as soon as plans are approved - estimated start date on or before September 1, 1992. The reason this unit was not remodeled along with the other six older units was because it was occupied, with the tenant moving to a new unit once final was approved. The owners are most interested in upgrading this unit as soon as possible, thereby inorder to complete the project. Sic ly, Fran irre Con c General Contractor FT/hk 73-510 Fred Waring Or., Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 i J E J a \RC I AA? APPUC A70C l F-CRA : Dept.of Planning and Community Development Applicant (phase print) 74 133 60 & :Bt Mmli/p or*" Telephone City State ZLp Coas REQUEST! (Oasatos specific nature of approval requested). 3 PROPERTY OESCRI�}PTIO'N:/ /J ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 6, 7 ' 11 -- �. EXISTING ZONING Property Owner Authorization The undersigned states trot they are ins owner(s) of me property described herein and hereby give author- or the tiling of this application. 115 iature Date Agreement absolving the ClIV114411M Oss all liaollinss reiative to any dead restrictions. 1 00 8Y MY SIGNATURE ON THIS AGREEMENT, Absolve the City of Palm Oesert of all liabilities regarding any dead restrictions that may be applicable to the property described herein. 1 ) ) 5 � Signature Da» Applicants Signature ;Q�� — %� - .7 lS Sig ature Oats (FOR STAFF USE ONLY) Environmental Status Accepted by: ❑ Ministerial Act E.A. No. - ❑ categorical Exemption CUBE Hf Oo, ❑ Negative Declaration ❑ other Reference Case No. a:+.a:aun saysa An H1-ee 627-111-01 j 627-113-008 -009 - 010 627-142-001 Ruthella M. Gibbons Charlotte A. Gfroerer Mr. & Mrs.J.N. Emort 10417 Oletha Lane 73-625 Catalina Way, Apt. 4 3151 Airway Ave. #F200 Los Angeles, CA 90077 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Cost Mesa, CA 92626 627-111-012 627-113-011 627-142-002 & 003 Mr. Constantine Coty Mr. & Mrs. James Hill Ms. Mary L. Hutcheson 2005 Noya P1. ! 44-447 San Carlos Ave. P.O.Box 845 Palos Verdes EstaM U CA Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Desert, CA 92260 627-111-013 & 627-111-014, 627-114-001 627-142-014 City of Palm Desert Mr. Juan F. Ramirez , Jr. Mr. & Mrs. D. Hover 73-510 Fred Waring Dr. 44-491 Portola Ave. 44-505 San Carlos Ave. Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Desert, CA 92260 627-112-006 627-114-002 627-142-012 Michael R. Fife et al Ruth F. Breslow r. & Mrs. W. Tweddle 1455 Via Monte Vista 23777 Mulholland Hwy #8j 44-525 San Carlos Ave. Palm Springs, CA 92262 Calabasas, CA 91302 Palm Desert, CA 92260 627-112-007 627-114-003 27-142-013 Olga E. Holmberg et al Mr. Perry L. Waite 4r. & Mrs. D. McCune 4862 Park Ave. 44-476 San Carlos Ave. 4-515 San Carlos Ave. Cypress CA 90630 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Desert, CA 92260 627-113-001 & 627- 113-002 627-114-005 27-142-015 Mr. & Mrs. Richard L. May Mr. Joe Mantia ' Mr_ .& Mrs. L. F. Isaac 1085 Ravoli Dr. Mr. & Mrs. Frank Clarizio 44-720 San Pablo Pacific Palisades, CA 2025 Winchester Ave. Palm Desert, CA 92260 90272 San Jose, CA 95124 627-113-003 627-114-006 627-143-001 Mr. & Mrs. Roger H. Tacy Mr. & Mrs. J. A. Welsh Jr. Mr. & Mrs. T.G.Hodges 44-430 San Rafael Ave. 32641 Seven Seal Dr. P.O.Box 1533 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Laguna NIgel, CA 92677 Palm Desert, CA 92261 627-113-004 627-114-007 627-143-002 Mr. & Mrs. Arthur Holt Mr. & Mrs. John Tatosian : Mr. Norman J.Landry 44-432 San Rafael Ave. 44-461 San Pasquel Mr.M. H. Russell Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Desert, CA 92260 44-510 San Carlos Ave. :Palm Desert, CA 92260 627-113-005 627-141-011 1627-143-012 Verona Stewert Mr. & Mrs. Elmer J. Paine r.&Mrs. C. F. Imbilli 44-476 San Rafael Ave. 4944 Cass St., Apt 1101 i44-555 San Pasquel Ave Palm Desert, CA 92260 San Deigo, CA, 92109 'Palm Desert. CA 92260 627-113-006 627-141-012 27-143-013 Mr. & Mrs. John Drummond Mr. &. Mrs. Elmer L. Paine Ms. M. E. Moorhead 2800 La Duela Ln. 4944 Cass St. Apt. 1101 3 Perch Carlsbad,^CA 92008 San Deigo, CA 92109 Irvine, CA 92714 100.17' N •00. 11e.00- 0 rr e o ^• o N O EXl5r1hl 2 BEDROOM UNIT 5 C RS de I e In �I 4 - N EXISTING _ _ _ - •o — _ _ __ I BEDROOM UNIT a M Lu b > o ¢Ln i 0 EXISTIND - O -_ ..-.J 2 BEDROCW MIT ¢ I — - -- v , O ul e e M • � � PARKING FOR 23 CARS o N i ^ I I I r- o J Z — _ O •• N BP•IW•00• 118.0 UNIT COUNT FOR SENIOR OVERLAY SITE AREA TABULATIONS BASED ON 55 YEARS AND OLDER EXISTING STRUCTURES = 6.605 S.F. • NEW STRUCTURES = 11.064 S.F. ' S TWO BEDROOM UNITS B 2 OCCUPANTS / UNIT = 10 - TOTAL STRUCTURES = I7,669 S.F. b ry 1 ONE BEDROOM UNIT B 1.75 OCCUPANTS / UNIT = 1.75 PARKING AREAS = 7.335 S.F. 0 14 STUDIO UNITS B 1.25 OCCUPANTS / UNIT = I7.5 O OPEN / LANDSCAPED AREAS = 26.374.87 M TOTAL OCCUPANT COUNT 29.2S TOTAL SITE AREA = S1.376.57 Is'-O IS'-o PARKING TABULATION 2 CARS / TWO BEDROOM UNIT = 5 UNITS x 2 = 10 CARS 1.75 CARS / ONE BEDROOM UNIT = I UNIT x 1.75 = 1.75 CARS 1.25 CARS / STUDIO UNIT = 14 UNITS x 1.25 = 17.50 CARS 0 TOTAL CARS REQUIRED = 28 7S CARS H By!5'02' E l00.1 v _ UNCOVERED SPACES = 13 CARS COVERED SPACES = 17 CARS ^/ S I T E I L A N TOTAL CARS PROVIDED = 30 CARS ------- ------ 17 ' *- - - '- •0F/[:�•;,. :'r✓ \� �f �• rV l - i _ I li _�. ! 71.�" ( a fl Y' �-!�J i�� •1- - a- ,,+ -r'sK \ r i � �/ I 1 ..,� � � I �-P`,�y✓GG,a —+ I - f )., ,'!y"O�t!�tAH • � ,kf 7"FLA •,:. 1 ,',�.��! �`.• j �� I _ � .�,-i, �!• . �/--• I.. S !�-✓ ' I _� -._lf- �,E,�I� � I i`�� ! .-}-, , 1N Wi�'`�k4' i�ri. � �'r. +; �. l � � i i ,1"" .f „ I I i �. S l ; ; Ivi E i -i IJ�I��=,f � ( � %� 3-- ���� �Nr ,• (.• ' � � � .' %�i� i's•i.'; � i �f,.f — �frt�I '_ih. I j -�-gyp- (f•'r.�/wro��,.4 �}, i� � \ E fI `t. X-•yam' �/, iaf VI cil �• s R1n c � , 1 f - i '' \ �"�;.. aL��;; 'Y i '(�•�ifil �j !1U��t?,•'•,i�a`' O �• ;• �• • •. t {i!.Gfk:� ;i'i > i ,. '� '',s�• hT'— Y-�i F ` '-.' xy"y��� / J - _ - .''�"�-. ol AN ITirV�'_.�i,�}'a, ' �•\ ��--- �..,� 51�w j } "+•</% � --� ia+'•,Gv...;":�{� kcal. � � � , ,. .• ! ' © Ali , y � - ( i Nii` rki• ' I � _: ,"[,i r• ix1r'cam G7� � � I p:#ilnvztey ���- �� �,• � +� � Ivy. _ �" - / t 1 - 1' �_A r� �} �.. TK P,J- Atllz� t - �- v `- V3r.;�-�•�� Tom" \� �s ' , . 14 s.:><�. q fj.ntf1LS Y rl:•. ,.,;.. ; .*•- - r I -�/�'�r k -�y M r�s. � _.�.::; _-.----.--"- h� � i' - ---- - - ! ': \ i � Gas✓, � � b '.�1G.f•i G+rPt N pit �1"1,�. - i {�� �� ��, N -------- ..._...- _ - �- ui�tr�f�- ✓ �� ;v�� � � l -F;Y}��t�-sue-, Y i�t�� �- --_ __ .__ -. _... _ ,,,_'. — �f + .t� w • - r - _ ... .— _ _ _.T1C '` • .,.v �t t 1f N"1 -�-Pro G p TPLt ." _ _ 1. - i � '_� � t. ; � a,�iS a '�L'�"+.•C1 r"���P•+' �V!.Y _ _.1E•� � �yOt7 .,.+.'`.. '1 .44 }}- - �L{G)`i-i r.-"�.� �; G-�yt� 2t►�cE ' + � - - - X`�T'.>+6'�t+�,�•{��• �y ;t�:tVir '� Lc ,p .•- .- `. ` - - �, o'z,, ep,vfj I- �G tdr N f�y .�---- -- - _ _ -� . 7 44, ri`r�P �►' .�� - - \ i r _. tom.+:+�rV�. �rtY��Ta ki. �`�.V�• : �► 3• N i =.✓t-�• �f s���!'* TCgr' _ _ , - , 'i �- I�ICILa F'I G� Nf (C ;�E � N�, `�• d7 G► t'fIt lit•}y.� ' �i IW}�{lr,, L/fF► t � ~ :!• f .- `vt�,f•s�a�, •I ,_ I + ,-,Ic•c�+�l;r, I .� (�- ` j__ _•_ N�FtN� �G�__ , fylyV ._ ?N -zG WHO 7 } -- - -_ / Fa F�G if-•2INr;> 4wc�e 44 ' �_:,.r_ � .''r+ j � �_ G t 1!•11�r"Y'4 f" l'+-— � � ' �� b`fib• (�;L4•�(1��G�A. .� ' # r ' ;�' L4 ,) 4tto& 4 .,Ne.� ;; i �,• ;� 1' Lrsi.ory n�lizl�� 1"N� �TMr w :1.•_.�f! y �+ y �� ((/f•ii ..\ 1 :VI - I= 1"r}� ' 119/ft ��•� �.iii!�"_ j tar ��► �' r- �•��w. •_ _ .. ., _ � •X �t1Fi s;�.� I' � � �► � do w�— , , ti a.;, ► • , J or w f Ci NCR r - ,+,�,.,, "c — j i o UQ 'Iry IS!� '+y ,� -• t s • _ ff n �s • e1-l�-Iva �o w CATALINA WAY 0 W A:TITLPI Dl ' W F N a z ¢ 0 100.47' N '00• 118.00' A:114M At • a A:001 Al A:002 At 26'-6- A:003WrS Al "' cc A:004 At .r 1� cn W A 006P Al 14'-0* 12'-6- • 00 p � • O A:004 Al C t _j �{�pp ^• • a N ' ~ Cp e • v X 0 EXISTING m A:1400 At • 2BEDROOM • D_ A:OQ AS e A:03 Al S CARS, cn A:02WI: Al ( ■ A:02NTSDF Al ' • ~ i • e all • In a J W • EXISTINOPOOL �" • o 0 LIVING/DINING SLEEPING CV 1n • 'O /v EXISTIM ■ o N ly •cw LVIT JOB #8520 .,r ti h • �C Mf (A M LIN. -- -- -- -- -- w . I 00 N > 1 s'-o o Q a' I W WASH/ y1 v I oc C� DRYER ( • Ul p KIT . I BATH e v- I EXISTINGB `� ' Q • F— I UNIT L Jo V V 0 cv W Q x-,— r r r Ln CL ct O 7'-9' 9'-9- 9'-0• O � e * LL LIJ 26 -6 ; F— : ~ '�' 00 • Z Q L O PARKING FOR 23 CARS o o o C o Q � u- TYPICAL STUDIO PLAN t In z � --j 'a C F— N Z V SQNDBE:F*0AAG2 OF-STUDIO UNIT = 636 50. FT. _J V) �--. Lu COL.) a v � � � �- o Z > J Ui .. .. Q p LlJ L11 Ul ��r 1 e. • -i , _, 4 Lu w W �o * F- Ln i � Q � Ln Q j • W T COUNT FOR SENIOR O VERL A Y SI TE AREA TABULA T I ONS CW S YEA AND OLDER EXISTING STRUCTURES = 6.608 S.F. = 12.9'i NEW STRUCTURES = It.064 S.F. = 21.V.. 4 s #� umis` ! it OCt�'ANTli / UNIT = 10 TOTAL STRUCTURES = 17.669 S.F. = 34.4% I "� T W 1.75 OCCi�ANYS / UNIT = 1.76 PARKIN AREAS = 7.335 S.F. = 14.3'i. co 14 4"0 " � 1.W ft)"ANTS / UNIT a 17.5 OPEN / LANDSCAPED ANEAS = �.374.d7 = b1.� 0. e TVA1• 000WANT COUNT = 29.28 TOTAL SITE AREA = 81.37f.A7 = 100i 2 10 CARS 8 1#�TS x - A.......,.��w.......� old x 1 #INIT >� 1.78 s 1.76 CARS %ft*a ammem w. %"WAR .r■. s srM•■w•�r•r M�a�A• •rlrr.r - m1 -14 UKT-S >K 1.28 s 17.60 CARS "own`:.■..r,,a Lt.7S CA#S 13 CARS arrrrwwwriw M . = 17 , . CAMS . , `� =. `tAt• .�5' IA = 30 CARS 0 C Fr 07LfAm o • a n ; ., r k ' r -'� ',�'� � •'', \ ,/� �� ' lam}' -`�t vk U', / `-� � � '�,/�'�• � ,��/ T , J r \ r. r +} `` ; \ \gib `\�� i / � �,•� � t\ -\ r { i x \ t\ ut ^ \ t , t ;�. :lam. .� ,Y ,� \}', 1., 11 � •+..'-..e f i,, �\ ;i'/ \.. ,ii - \ --___.._ F. + \ l pC �a i t r y s r \ k .• 4 x r' t • 1 - ' i r jj x , + \ I , " a /1` 1 F{ jj 1 NN 1 f \ f 1 t l a , , s \ F\ \ \ \• �. o`''' — Y F, , I ` ;r " '��" P� S li J ,. �'*-•s l \ ! AAA t'dj � _ • , " 5'`--+'�'.t.� �' ���k ue��L �,\ '� �'✓ /r ^� �� �, � �,�} ..-.-_-f � � � �_ _tea �{ n .�:, _ - � A,rr�2� > ���� \,',\ ,,✓'''ram l , : 3 1 1 • f • f� . Y #fit. • eg 10 r A - lowe rh ot Oil �a 4 ' b � � _j �"' �� _ 5 fir, ��:� ♦ , ems„ � "�� ,,a► � � • <pr 5 s 4*1 } s { Nox r _ M F QD LLj o LU _L _ CY CId LL ui uj Go I •CL a uj uj T 3 k 4 n s " t-•..' �".;'#.. r (�-.• :.. _-. _ k ice` A{ ' Y ti - x f'. - ,$ a� -... ,.. %�"« ., ,?` � ... r- ..,d ,.% .fi• _{ _ - .ae - = his } i - - " :.� .. �, - _ -,_.. .,-.: • 5 -.-ram� . .'.rt. f1. � �.,- ��*.4.. / # !! X Awl _ _ , . � - _ - - ,> .,,, _.. � - >_ ��i! .. �'i•ai� 't�9i;alit. � �_. >< aka- � r x - • An 1• - �14 • s � • � a a _ _ r - _ P y - z �, All �fAL i •ra� ,7 to M r-•- F 4 :1� AkNL AVPWARW �1A, t Ar 0 • �t ���... � �AY AP .. s.44 %r. +...•: S: ;ii .a« ��1\' 'Y►,"i�ll,..o .rrtir. ^,,, 7♦� 'fit".`'« ' .1. .'._..' ,Ili' 10 �./ _�� �alr''„ i • /�' .... 00 00 00 .r, Yra 'f L p '�► „�, �'� '� .. L � ..# / � �, � i. -� -l. _eY/� III �/�•� A- , A.. r tl r •�,, r. I It AW MOB 950 SO. FTw 'ANNE son , :01MIE MEN 14, IN db 00 amm MEN NEM � ., mop ® � MEN domONE ! • • • • • }�. mom do IL RON �m� mom i0 � i r mom ' ams • I ■n M r 1 MEN „I, u " 950 SO. FITS q I w•� q �r, All `I E . a '` ' • I CI lk- i ti It, + �,rIV, -� q�;� lU• -�� "", -' ": _ l I i J��n.'�� �&. �i��� ., ,� amum*mm K�. �;;a +:,� , �p9Rtl k1'NR4�49� .�tr,. , ;r,, N 1f1 W �. I. ,,. '.� » _J�M��gb lA� '- v.._.. Yp y S.yq'p�,, � ,,�:/.I+✓�" �q A.� ' nr.,�- � ».. ri�"'y.� w e,,..ryw„ �� � � - � s , � r� A MO ,.iN W MAp�N'.�.'MN;nkEn ,YIIP�'R y. MW loft — 1 , • r :.V'..: 1 t'n`Ab',s,enwx r ` `f �.,.. ry� � f r _ LLµ a �t ® x I a° "•anti Y : „�W�+„a„�...:..- .M.J R. ,+ , ., 1 ��" t ., " u.:., �� �'°r,.�R:j� ':n a.Nndr✓.w,rWir(�iH's' y . - . A r ANUM 5 I.��m o i li, j ' .r r� Lj •r„.' 11 'A�/� "fir t ', - »:x'�'''r •ay'� �..°�� •7:* n do �"' .,r'.ar'.,wE,� - Ii�IpA'�'AF, S r � 1,• k aw., iJ�lill � ii I I. a f 1 i f a Y V ♦ : a Y I f , C{ r Lei O PW � a r • w ow MF'+Mlri16 16, _w.. _ W � bk I r. I C � a I ; w Y I ® as it 1J .. P M "�F�' ��^e mn�d•.PYM1lMM1'MYIYIM�I^ n+w.c.:.'M�R�W'llil ' �(g�.v„ �pw*nn*+W.aw�emnn�u '. 1� - '�wa.ws�nlnlrlp+ny+.�e�epn► �w :.errnn+rssw.aaen. �1 - ry ., . .- ....._ _.—. ..._..- w...- -•--.._ �r_ __.. - :-.- .Z.S. �T..r 'T w;+- Tom.. T+� }' - _ Np�` T...r��w 11��� �� 1�'___�.��F'T�r `�r'.�rw_"_\� M -ird_'fir_ - a Jil �'' :+wre�zrw � rrrs�w ten• wrrr� r»_� �� � r»s r��. �w it .���. ,��. �. jw y nth,• ' '�k:t °'�, ,� o� :�,,. � ,`. A b w I ,o[ ��'�. aa�m::M7es.;rutrWw'w« ...:M 4tf IYi iJr!^ '-1V1F�.. . aM►i�+''r'N"n,u�,iW11 °,� ,yt 7 .rndilElh� a .I Y - r , .� � .- � �I'�' �. '- A;Ak l5Y W6111�Aio tl( iil _;, . �'R �. ,.,. � • m7 -Poo- y ; AN, moban Ji ! c 1 ; I M ti .,