Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPP 86-20 APARTMENTS/SAN PASCUAL AVENUE 1989 PRECISE PLAN TENTATIVE TRACT ZONE:: CHANGE - I PARCEL MAP VARIANCE U.U.P. REFER TO: APPLI(:ANT -- LOCATION REQtJFST EXISTING ZONE PREPARATION PROGRESS DATE BY COMMENTS APPLICATION RECEIVED _ LEGAL PUBLICATION SENT _NOTICES SENT FIELD INVESTIGATION DEPTS. NOTIFIED 13UII-DING ENGINEERING FIRE POLICE RECREATION & PARKS SCHOOL DISTRICT _DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS 17LOOD CONTROL PRELIMINARY MEETING l_- STAFF REPORT FINAL_ PLAN APPROVAL PRECISE PLAN (6) ! = c0-f LANDSCAPING PLAN (5) - t- J - PLAN. DIRECTOR MOD. (6) HEARINGS & ,vACT'IONS T T DATE ACTION VOTE REVIEW BOARD HEARING P.C. _HEARING PUBLISHED P.C. PUBLIC HEARING APPLICANT NOTIFIED C.C. PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE NO. RESOLUTION NO. EFFECTIVE DATE RECORDED FOR DATA- BANK ZONING MAP CORRECTED 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA92260 October 18, 989 TELEPHONE(619)346-0611 ARCHITBCIURAL REVIBA CCK4ESSION ACTICN CASE NO.; PP 86-20 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): AHMANSON CCNMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT, 1173 Parkview Drive, Suite 360, Covina, CA 91724 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Final plan approval for dial building on Pad 9 LOCATION: S.W. Corner of Fred Waring Dr. and Tom Center Way ZONE: P/C (3) S.P. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Upon reviewing the submitted plans and presentations by staff and by the applicant, the architectural cGmiission approved the case by minute motion. Chairman Gregory abstained. Date of Action: October 10, 1989 Vote:,,Carried 3-0-1 (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. ) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ STAFF COMMENTS: Please read the attached minutes. It is your responsibility to submit the plans approved by the architectural ccmnission to the department of building and safety. CONTINUED CASES: In order to be placed on the next meetings agenda, new or revised plans must be submitted no later than 9:00 a.m. the Monday prior to the next meeting. PROOF OF, PUBLICATION This space Is for the`CouriN.Clerk'sFiling Stamp nl,( M O (2o1s.s c.c.P.) '86 nnY 27 8M 8 06 QITY CLERKS OFFICE STATE OF. CALIFORNIA, County of Riverside CITY OF PALM DESERT I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to Proof of Publication of or interested in the above-entitled matter. 1 CASE NO. PP 86-20 am the principal clerk of the printer of the .......................................................... DESERT POST CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE ...............................................:..... CASE NO.PP 86-20 a newspaper of general circulation, printed NOT ICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by BOB COTY B i-week 1 for approval of a five unit apartment project on the northeast corner of and published y Santa Rosa Way and San Pascual Avenue,more particularly described p ...... ......................... as Lot 22 o1 Palm Village Garden Tract in the CityOf P.altu•D"ar•E••••......••• SAID public hearing will be held on Tuesday,June 3.1986 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber at the Palm Desert City Hall.73.510 Fred War. County of Riverside, and Which news- Ing Drive,Palm Desert,California,at which time and place all Interested persons are Invited to attend and be heard.It you challenge the propos- paper has been adjudged a newspaper ad actions In court,you may be limited to raising only those Issues you of general circulation by the Superior or someone'else raised at the public hearing described in this notice,or In written correspondence delivered to the city council(or planning Court of the County of Riverside, State of commission)at.or prior to,the public hearing. Ramon A.Dlaz,Secretary Palm Desert Planning Commission California, under the date of 10/S 19 64 (Pub.D.P.May 23. 1986) Case Number .83658 - that the notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpareil), has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: 5/23 .................................................... all in the year 19.8.6.. I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated at....?.a7m.P.?.S�rx................... California,this..23.rd..dayof...KaX, 1986.• Free copies of this blank form rNy be NCYfee bYm: CALIFORNIA NEWSPAPER SERVICE BUREAU, INC. Legal Advertising Clearing House 120 west Second St., Los Angeles, Calif. 90012 -I Telephone: (213) 625.2541 - FIeeN reeuNt 6 E N E R AL Fr00f of►Yblicallw when ordering this form. =w 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 January 15, 1987 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION ACTION CASE NO: 305 MF APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) : R08 COTY, 2005 Noya, Palos Verdes Estates, CA 90274. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT. Final approval of landscape plan. LOCATION: Northeast corner of San Pascual and Santa Rosa Way. ZONE• R-3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Upon reviewing the submitted plans and presentations by staff and by the applicant, the architectural commission approved this case by minute motion. Date of Action: January 13, 1987 Vote: Carried 4-0 (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen ( 15) days of the date of the decision. ) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ STAFF COMMENTS: Please read the attached minutes. Nl tit nl s PALM Pf Sf.l!I ARCI I I I EC I URAI_ t01f111551()N ]III SOAY - JAHOARY 13, 1987 1 :00 P.N. COMIIUNIIY SERVICES CONFERENCE RUUN 73-510 FRED HARING DRIVE % % % % % % X N % N 4 % % % N 1 . the meeting was called to order al: I :0 0 pm after a one hour study session. Commission Members Current Neetinq Year to Date P1eesent. Absent Present Absent Ron Gregory, Chairman x 1 0 . AI Cook x 1 0 Mary Drury x 0 I Russell McCrea Y. l 0 Rick Holden, AI Let nate x I 0 Staff Present: Steve Smith Catherine Sass Phil Drell Ken Weller Donna Gomez It was moved by ComOssioner Holden, seconded by Cormmissioner McCrea to approve the minutes of December 23, 1986 as written. Carried 4-0 11 . Iloved by Commissioner Cook, seconded by Commissioner McCrea to approve the following cases by minute motion. Carried A-D (Chairman Gregory abstaining on Case No. 321 C) . I . CASE NO: 297 MF APPLICANT AND ADDRESS) : L & T DEVELOPMENI , 80-899 Indio Blvd. , Indio, CA 92201 . NATURE OF PROJE�AITIIUVAL SOUGIIT Final approval of 20 unit senior citizen apartment project. LOCATION: Southwest corner of Catalina Way and San Carlos Avenue. ZONE: R-2 5.0. 2. CASE MO: 286 111` APPLI_CANF (AND AUURE55) : SIAN LITTLF, 72-660 Be] Air-, Palm Desert, CA 92260. NATURE OF PROJECT_/APPROVALSOUGIII : Final approval of plans to add a duplex to a 6 unit apartment Complex.. LOCATIONI: West side of San Rafael , 300 feet north of San Gorgonio. ZONE: R-3 rn rlu 1 Ls ARCIIIIECTIIRAL CON11155ION JANUARY 13, 1961 3. CASE NO: 945 5F APPLICANT LAND ADURESQ_�_ RICK JOHNSON CONSTRUCTION, P.O. Box 2288, Indio, CA 92202. NATURE _orPROJECl/Ar-PROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of 18 foot height on single family res1 der ce. LOCATION: 45-675 Del Coronado Drive (Cook & Fairway) . ZONE: R- I All salient Iry the commission including the fact that the two adjacent residences have pitch roofs. 4. CASE NO: 1271 SA APOILICANT_(ANU AUURESS) : ROBERT PITCUFORD, 73-960 El Pasco, Palm Desert, CA 92260. NATURE OF PR(>JE!�y PROVAL SOUGIII Approval of color change for approved awning. LOCATION: 73-660 El Paseo ZONE: C- 1 Approval is for color change only, no signage has been approved for the awnings. 5. CASE NO: 1283 SA APPLICANI (AND ADDRESS BULLOCKS WILSHIRE, 800 S. Hope Street, Los Angeles, CA. MATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGH: Sign program for Bullock's Wilshire. LOCATION: Palm Desert Town Center ZONE: PC (3) S.P. 6. CASE NO: 1276 SA APPLICANT (/1rID ADDRESS)__ HEATH SIGN COMPANY, 4703 Bengal Street, Dallas, IX 15235 for luny Roma's. 2 MINUIUS ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION JANUARY 13, 1987 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of business identifi- cation sign. LOCATION: 73-155 Highway III ZONE: C-1 S.P. Subject to signage on awning appearing only once on each direction. 7. CASE NO: 1284 SA APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) : PORTALS, 73-280 El Paseo, Palm Desert, CA 92260; MIDORI , 73-759 Highway 111 , Palm Desert, CA 92260. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of replacement awning with signage. LOCATION: 73-759 Highway III ZONE: C-1 S.P. 8. CASE NO: 305 MF APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) : ROB COTY, 2005 Noya, Palos Verdes Estates, CA 90274. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Final approval of landscape plan. LOCATION: Northeast corner of San Pascual and Santa Rosa Way. ZONE: R-3 9. CASE NO• 321 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): TRULY NOLEN, 72-273 Highway 111 , Palm Desert, CA 92260. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of precise plan, architecture and landscape plan. LOCATION: St. Charles Place east of Boardwalk in the Palm Desert Business Center. ZONE: S. I . S.P. 3 i 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 2 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 October 20, 1986 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION ACTION CASE NO• 305 MF APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): ROB COTY, 2005 Noya, Palos Verdes Estates, CA 90274. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Final approval for a five unit apartment project. LOCATION: Northeast corner of San Pascual and Santa Rosa Way. ZONE• R-3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Upon reviewing the submitted plans and presentations by staff and by the applicant, the architectural commission approved this case by minute motion subject to conditions. Date of Action: October 14, 1986 Vote: Carried 4-0 (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen ( 15) days of the date of the decision. ) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ STAFF COMMENTS: Please read the attached minutes. MINUTES PALM DESERT ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION TUESDAY - OCTOBER 14. 1986 1:00 P.M. COMMUNITY SERVICES CONFERENCE ROOM 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE I. The meeting was called to order at 1 :00 pm after a one hour study session. Commission Members Current Meeting Year to Date Present Absent Present Absent Ron Gregory, Chairman X 19 0 Al Cook X 14 5 Mary Drury X 13 6 Charlie Martin X 18 1 Russell McCrea X 15 4 Rick Holden, Alternate X 14 5 Staff Present: Ray Diaz Steve Smith Catherine Sass Ken Weller Donna Gomez It was moved by Commissioner Drury, seconded by Chairman Gregory to approve the minutes of September 23, 1986 as written. Carried 3-0-1 (Commissioner McCrea abstaining) . 11. Moved by Commissioner McCrea, seconded by Commissioner Drury to approve the following cases by minute motion. Carried 4-0 (Chairman Gregory abstained on Birtcher-Dunham case). 1. CASE NO: APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) : BIRTCHER-DUNHAM, 73-080 El Paseo #101 , Palm Desert, CA 92260; RON GREGORY, 73-960 Highway 111 #2, Palm Desert, CA 92260. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Final approval of landscape plans for Birtcher Dunham project. LOCATION: Highway III and Fred Waring Drive. ZONE• PC (4) 2. CASE NO• 312 MF APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) : EDWARDS CONSTRUCTION, 11703 Anabel Avenue, Garden Grove, CA. MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION OCTOBER 14, 1986 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Final approval of working drawings for four-plex. LOCATION: South side of Shadow Mountain west of San Luis Rey. ZONE: R-3 13,000 (3) Approval subject to addition of two foot planters at both garages. 3. CASE NO: 305 MF APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): ROB COTY, 2005 Noya, Palos Verdes Estates, CA 90274. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Final approval for a five unit apartment project. LOCATION: Northeast corner of San Pascual and Santa Rosa Way. ZONE• R-3 Approval subject to the following conditions: I . Relocation of cabana to area that complies with code. 2. Landscape plan to be reviewed and approved by this commission prior to building permit issuance. 3. Commission pointed out that the submitted plans were not prepared by a licensed architect as required. 4. CASE NO: 316 MF APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): DR. G. ROBERT ROGERS, MESA VIEW PARTNERS, 73-261 Highway 111 , Palm Desert, CA 92260. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of redesign of a residential project consisting of one single family residence, one duplex structure and one vacant lot for a future R-I type structure. LOCATION: A triangular shaped parcel directly southeast of the intersection of Mesa View Drive and Highway 74. 2 j MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 17, 1986 i VI. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Case No. PMW 86-10 - PALM DESERT TOWN CENTER, Applicant Request for approval of a lot line adjustment for layer Robinson's store at town center. . Action: Moved by Commissioner Downs, seconded by Commissioner Richards approving the consent calendar by minute motion. i i I VI1. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Continued Case Mos. PP 86-20 and A�3J- ROB COTY, Applicant Request for a five unit apartment project located at the northeast corner of San Pascual and Santa Rosa. Mr. Drell outlined the salient points of the staff report explaining that the main Issues were parking and the east property line. The applicant Is proposing to reduce the side yard setback from 10 feet to five feet on the east property line. The building has been oriented east-west which provides less building on the elevation facing the adjacent property. The parking that was to back onto the street has been deleted. He noted that an additional five foot dedication was required and that this plan provided more architectural advantages and recommended approval . Vice Chairman Erwood opened the public testimony and asked the applicant to address the commission. MR. ROB COTY, 41-557 Armanac Court, Palm Desert, concurred with the staff report and conditions. Commissioner Richards asked the applicant if he had contacted the owner of the adjacent property. Mr. Coty replied that the owner of the adjacent apartments resided out of town and only had a post office box number. Commissioner Richards asked If he had been notified. Mr. Drell replied that he had. Vice Chairman Erwood asked if anyone present wished to speak in FAVOR or OPPOSITION to the proposed. . There being no one, Vice Chairman Erwood closed the public testimony. 2 I MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 17, 1986 i Commissioner Richards expressed concern that the adjacent property owner was not present. Mr. Diaz stated that he had been notified. r Mr. Drell informed commission that the adjacent neighbor built in an R-2 zone with a five foot setback, which would be the same as was proposed for this project. Action: Moved by Commissioner Wood, seconded by Commissioner Downs adopting the findings as presented by staff. Carried 4-0 Moved by Commissioner Wood, seconded by Commissioner Downs adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 1150, approving PP 86-20 and VAR 86-3, subject to conditions. Carried 4-0 B. Case No. VAR 86-2 =' HASSAN ZAREMEJAD, Applicant Request for approval of a side yard setback variance from 30 feet combined to 20 feet for a new house proposed on the east side of Verba Santa, 420 feet north of Ironwood Street. Mr. Joy out iIned the salient points of the staff report, noting that the zoning and setbacks were set prior to city standards. He explained that the applicant was requesting a reduction of the eq 9 side yard setbacks, but informed commission that 20 feet is standard. -He indicated that Mr.' Frank UrrutIa and 'the property owners across the street expressed opposition. Mr. Joy informed ' commission that It was approved by the property owners association and recommended approval . Commissioner Wood asked why staff was over ruling the objections for the setbacks, Mr. Joy replied that a 10,000 square foot lot requires a 20 foot combined setback. Mr. Diaz asked •if Mr. Urruita's property meets the current setback requirements. Mr. Joy replied that he has 23 feet combined which is less than the code requirement of 30 feet. Vice Chairman Erwood opened the public testimony. MR. HASSAN 'ZARENEJAD, owner, stated that the staff report = covered the issues. He indicated that the setback of 30 feet was established for R-3 zoned property. - He explained that a number of these lots have been divided in half, with an 80 foot lot having a 30 foot setback would be difficult. He indicated that he went through the neighborhood and measured some lots the same size 'as hIs. •' -The existing setbacks on these lots ranged I 3 I _ Il 1^ t 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NOTICE OF ACTION June 20, 1986 ROB COTY 2005 Noya Place Palos Verdes Estates, CA RE: PPS 86-20)and VAR 86-3 The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of June 17, 1986. APPROVED BY RESOLUTION NO. 1150 CARRIED 4-0. Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Community Development, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen ( 15) days of the date of the decision J RAMON A. DIAZ, SECRE(jjrRY PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION RAD/dlg PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1150 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PRECISE PLAN AND SIDE YARD VARIANCE TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A FIVE UNIT APARTMENT PROJECT LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SANTA ROSA WAY AND SAN PASCUAL AVENUE. CASE NO: PP 86-20 8 VAR 86-3 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California. did on the 17th day of June. 1986 hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider a request by ROB COTY for approval of a five unit apartment project located on a 13,000 square foot lot within the R-3 S.O. zone at the northeast corner of Santa Rosa Way and San Pascual Avenue. WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedures for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 80-89", in that the director of community develop- ment has determined that the project is a class 3 categorical exemption. WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testi- mony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said planning commission did find the following facts to exist to justify their actions. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL OF PRECISE PLAN: 1 . The proposed use is of higher design quality and of similar intensity and type as surrounding uses and therefore will not depreciate property values in the vicinity. 2. The proposed project will not endanger the public health, safety or general welfare. 3. The proposed project will not interfere with the use or enjoyment of property in the vicinity by occupants thereof for lawful purposes. 4. The project is consistent with the zoning ordinance (except for approved variance) the general plan and specifically implements the neighborhood improvement goals of the Palm Village Specific Plan. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL OF VARIANCE: 1 . The strict enforcement of the ten foot side yard requirement would significantly restrict the livability of the proposed units or result in an alternative design which would be more detrimental to the adjacent property owner. 2. The additional five foot right of way dedication required of this property further restricts site planning alternatives relative to other properties in the vicinity. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1150 3. The strict interpretation of the ordinance in this case would severely restrict the property owners ability to develop the five units allowed by the zone and meet the other goals and objectives of the ordinance. 4. The site plan permitted by the variance allows development of a higher quality project with a net benefit to the public health, safety. and general welfare. NOW. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1 . That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the commission in this case. 2. Precise Plan 86-20 and VAR 86-3 are hereby approved subject to attached conditions. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 17th day of June, 1986 by the following vote, to wit: AYES: DOWNS, RICHARDS, WOOD & ERWOOD NOES: NONE ABSENT: CRITES ABSTAIN: NONE / R TTICK ERWOOD, Vic Chairman A ` /e 1�4 RAMON A. DIAZ. Secretary /dig 2 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1150 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO. PP 86-20 8 VAR 86-3 Department of Community Development• 1 . The development of the property shall conform substantially with exhibits on file with the department of community development, as modified by the following conditions. 2. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein which are in addition to all municipal ordinances and state and federal statutes now in force, or which hereafter may be in force. 3. Construction of a portion of said project shall commence within one year from the date of final approval unless a time extension is granted, other- wise said approval shall become null , void and of no effect whatsoever. 4. Prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contem- plated by this approval , the applicant shall first obtain permits and/or clearance from the following agencies: Riverside County Department of Health Palm Desert Architectural Commission City Fire Marshal Coachella Valley Water District Palm Desert Water and Services District Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to the department of building and safety at the time of issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. 5. Trash provisions shall be approved by applicable trash company and city prior to issuance of building permit. 6. Projects shall pay school impact mitigation fees of $628 per unit or as arranged with the Desert Sands Unified School District. Department of Public Works: 1 . Drainage and signalization fund fees, as required by city ordinance, shall be paid prior to grading permit issuance. 2. Storm drai.n construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study by the private engineer that is approved by the department of public works. 3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1150 3. Full public improvements, including traffic safety lighting, as required by ordinance and the director of public works, shall be installed in accordance with city standards. 4. Complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted. as required by ordinance, to the city engineer for checking and approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. The engineer shall submit "as-built" plans prior to the acceptance of the improvements by the city. 5. All private driveways and parking lots shall be inspected by the engineering department and a standard inspection fee shall be paid prior to grading permit issuance. 6. Landscaping maintenance on San Pascual and Santa Rosa shall be provided by the property owner. 7. Complete grading plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the city engineer for checking and approval prior to issuance of any permits. 8. Dedication of five feet of right-of-way on Santa Rosa and San Pascual shall be done prior to issuance of any permits and approval of plans. 9. Installation of curb, gutter and matching paving and sidewalk on Santa Rosa and sidewalk on San Pascual . 10. Close unused driveway on San Pascual with full height curb and gutter. 11 . Offsite improvement plans to be approved by public works department and a surety posted to guarantee the required offsite improvements prior to grading permit issuance. 12. Size, number and location of driveways to public works specifications with only two driveway approaches to be allowed to serve this property. 13. Only one driveway approach shall be allowed along Santa Rosa with a maximum width of thirty feet. 14. Line of sight across the corner of San Pascual and Santa Rosa shall be forty feet. City Fire Marshal : 1 . Install a water system capable of delivering 2500 GPM fire flow from any fire hydrant for a 2 hour duration in addition to domestic supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating 4 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1150 Pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement. 2. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants so that no point of any building is more than 250 feet from a fire hydrant measured along approved vehicular travel ways. a. exterior surface of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. b. curbs shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. C. hydrants shall not be located closer than 25 feet to any building. 3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and three copies of the water system plan to the fire marshal for review. Upon approval , one copy will be sent to the building department and the original will be returned to the developer. 4. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and approved by the water company with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system in PP 86-20 is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the fire marshal ". 5. Prior to delivery of combustible materials to the building site, the required water system shall be installed, operating and delivering the required flow. 6. Additional fire protection requirements may be necessary when the applicant submits specific plans for consideration and approval . /dlg 5 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 17, 1986 VI. CONSENT CALENDAR i A. Case No. PMN 86-10 - PALM DESERT TOWN CENTER, Applicant Request for approval of a lot line adjustment for layer Robinson's store at town center. Action: Moved by Commissioner Downs, seconded by Commissioner Richards approving the consent calendar by minute motion. i VII. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Continued Case Nos. PP 86-20 VAR 86-3 - ROB COTY, "Appiicant Request for a five unit apartment project located at the northeast corner of San Pascual and Santa Rosa. Mr. Drell outlined the salient points of the staff report .explaining that the ma i n issues were parking and the east property line. The applicant is proposing to reduce the side yard setback from 10 feet to five feet on the east property .line. The building has been oriented east-west which provides less building on the elevation facing the adjacent property. .The parking that was to back onto the street has been deleted. He noted that an additional five foot dedication was required and that this plan provided more architectural advantages and recommended approval . Vice Chairman Erwood opened the public testimony and asked the applicant to address the commission. MR. ROB COTY, 41-557 Armanac Court, Palm Desert, concurred with the staff report and conditions. Commissioner Richards asked the applicant if he had contacted the owner of the adjacent property. Mr. Coty replied that the owner of the adjacent apartments resided out of town and only had a post office box number. Commissioner Richards asked if he had been notified. Mr. Drell replied that he had. Vice Chairman Erwood asked If anyone present wished to speak In FAVOR or OPPOSITION to the proposed. . There being no one, Vice Chairman Erwood closed the public testimony. 2 I is , MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 17. 1966 I Commissioner Richards expressed concern that the adjacent property owner was not present. Mr. Diaz stated that he had been notified. Mr: Drell Informed commission that the adjacent neighbor built in an R-2 zone with a five foot setback, which would be the same as was proposed for this project. Action.- Roved by Commissioner Wood, seconded by Commissioner Downs adopting the findings as presented by staff. Carried 4-0 Moved by Commissioner Wood, seconded by Commissioner Downs adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 1150, approving PP 86-20 and VAR 86-3, subject to conditions. Carried 4-0 B. Case No. VAR 86-2 - HASSAN ZARENEJAD, Applicant Request for approval of a side yard setback variance from 30 feet combined to 20 feet for a new house proposed on the east side of Verba Santa, 420 feet north of Ironwood Street. Mr. Joy outlined the salient points of the staff report, noting that the zoning and setbacks were set prior to city standards. He explained that the applicant was requesting a reduction of the side yard setbacks, but informed commission that 20 feet is standard. `-='He indicated that Mr.' Frank Urrutia and the property owners across the street expressed opposition. Mr. Joy informed commission that It was approved by the property owners association and recommended approval . Commissioner Wood asked why staff was over ruling the objections for the setbacks. Mr. Joy replied that a 10,000 square foot lot requires a 20 foot combined setback. Mr. Diaz asked -if Mr. Urrulta's property meets the current setback requirements. Mr. Joy replied that he has 23 feet combined which is less than the code requirement of 30 feet. Vice Chairman Erwood opened the public testimony. MR. HASSAN `ZARENEJAD, owner, stated that the staff report = covered the issues. - He indicated that the setback of 30 feet was established for R-3 zoned property. He explained that a . i number of these lots have been divided in half, with an 80 foot " lot having a 30 foot setback would be difficult. He indicated ' that he went through the neighborhood and measured some lots the i same size "as his. The existing setbacks on these lots ranged i 3 i i I ' i CITY OF PALM DESERT DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission DATE: June 17, 1986 CASE NO: PP 86-20 and VAR 86-3 REQUEST: Approval of a precise plan and side yard variance to allow construction of a five unit apartment project within the R-3 zone located on the northeast corner of Santa Rosa Way and San Pascual Avenue. APPLICANT: ROB COTY DAVID DUGDALE 2005 Noya Place 46-618 Madison #42 Palos Verdes Estates, CA Indio, CA 92201 I. BACKGROUND: A. ADJACENT ZONING/LAND USE: North: R-3 S.O./Single family South: R-2 S.O./Multi family East: R-3 S.O./Multi family West: R-3 S.O./Multi family B. PROJECT DATA: Pro.iect Ordinance Requirement Site Area 13,000 sq. ft. (gross) No. of Units 5 5 Unit Mix 4 - 2 bd, I bath, 850 sq. ft. 800 sq. ft. 1 - 2 bd, 2 bath, 1120 sq. ft. Building Height 22 feet 22 feet Building Coverage 31% 50% maximum Landscape Open Space 36% Setbacks - Front 15 feet 15 feet Interior 5 feet 10 feet Street Side 10 feet 10 feet Parking 10 spaces 10 spaces (6 covered) (5 covered) C. ANALYSIS: The project consists of a two story flat roofed southwestern pueblo style building containing five apartments. Parking is located off of San Pascual on the north side of the lot. The current proposal represents a substantial revision of the plan originally presented to the architectural commission. Although the PP 86-20 9 VAR 86-3 original plan was in technical compliance with the zoning ordinance, the architectural commission identified several design problems which necessitated revision of the site plan as well as architecture. The lot, after five foot right of way dedications on both San Pablo and Santa Rosa measures 79.25' (Santa Rosa frontage) X 149' (San Pascual frontage) . In the original design the building's length ran north-south consistent with the length of the lot. This orientation resulted in three problems. 1 . The front of the building facing west, could not be protected from the intense afternoon summer sun. Normally the pueblo style works best with a south exposure where the large overhangs can shade the building and glass during most summer hours. 2. The rear parking area width was restricted forcing three open spaces to be located in the front setback backing out onto Santa Rosa. 3. The property to the east was exposed to the maximum length of two story elevation. The architectural commission recommended that the building be rotated 90% to face south solving the solar exposure problem, providing room in the parking lot for an additional three spaces and reducing the length of the two story elevation facing the adjacent property from 75 feet to 42 feet. The revision was facilitated by reducing the total building length to 64 feet narrowing each unit to 20 feet in width. Unfortunately the new plan requires the granting of a side yard variance reducing the eastern building setback from 10 feet to 5 feet. The situation is further complicated by the additional five foot right of way dedication. The architectural commission felt that the significant overall improvement of the project justified the variance. The benefits to the adjacent property owner of the substantially shorter two story exposure far outweigh the possible sight line benefits of the additional five foot setback. Heavy landscaping will be required to further soften the impact. D. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL OF PRECISE PLAN: 1 . The proposed use is of higher design quality and of similar intensity and type as surrounding uses and therefore will not depreciate property values in the vicinity. 2 PP 86-20 8 VAR 86-3 2. The proposed project will not endanger the public health, safety or general welfare. 3. The proposed project will not interfere with the use or enjoyment of property in the vicinity by occupants thereof for lawful purposes. 4. The project is consistent with the zoning ordinance (except for approved variance) the general plan and specifically implements the neighborhood improvement goals of the Palm Village Specific Plan. E. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL OF VARIANCE: 1 . The strict enforcement of the ten foot side yard requirement would significantly restrict the livability of the proposed units or result in an alternative design which would be more detrimental to the adjacent property owner. 2. The additional five foot right of way dedication required of this property further restricts site planning alternatives relative to other properties in the vicinity. 3. The strict interpretation of the ordinance in this case would severely restrict the property owners ability to develop the five units allowed by the zone and meet the other goals and objectives of the ordinance. 4. The site plan permitted by the variance allows development of a higher quality project with a net benefit to the public health, safety, and general welfare. II1. RECOMMENDATION: Approve findings and adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. approving PP 86-20 and VAR 86-3 subject to conditions. Prepared by� 117 Reviewed and Approved by /dig 3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PRECISE PLAN AND SIDE YARD VARIANCE TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A FIVE UNIT APARTMENT PROJECT LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SANTA ROSA WAY AND SAN PASCUAL AVENUE. CASE NO: PP 86-20 8 VAR 86-3 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 17th day of June, 1986 hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider a request by ROB COTY for approval of a five unit apartment project located on a 13,000 square foot lot within the R-3 S.O. zone at the northeast corner of Santa Rosa Way and San Pascual Avenue. WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedures for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 80-89", in that the director of community develop- ment has determined that the project is a class 3 categorical exemption. WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testi- mony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said planning commission did find the following facts to exist to justify their actions. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL OF PRECISE PLAN: 1 . The proposed use is of higher design quality and of similar intensity and type as surrounding uses and therefore will not depreciate property values in the vicinity. 2. The proposed project will not endanger the public health, safety or general welfare. 3. The proposed project will not interfere with the use or enjoyment of property in the vicinity by occupants thereof for lawful purposes. 4. The project is consistent with the zoning ordinance (except for approved variance) the general plan and specifically implements the neighborhood improvement goals of the Palm Village Specific Plan. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL OF VARIANCE: 1 . The strict enforcement of the ten foot side yard requirement would significantly restrict the livability of the proposed units or result in an alternative design which would be more detrimental to the adjacent property owner. 2. The additional five foot right of way dedication required of this property further restricts site planning alternatives relative to other properties in the vicinity. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3. The strict interpretation t ' n of the ordinance in this case would severely restrict the property owners ability to develop the five it allowed b the zone and meet the other goals and objectives of units a y 9 J the ordinance. 4. The site plan permitted by the variance allows development of a higher quality project with a net benefit to the public health, safety, and general welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1 . That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the commission in this case. 2. Precise Plan 86-20 and VAR 86-3 are hereby approved subject to attached conditions. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 17th day of June, 1986 by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: BUFORD CRITES, Chairman ATTEST: RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary /dlg 2 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. _ CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO. PP 86-20 8 VAR 86-3 . Department of Community Development: 1 . The development of the property shall conform substantially with exhibits on file with the department of community development, as modified by the following conditions. 2. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein which are in addition to all municipal ordinances and state and federal statutes now in force, or which hereafter may be in force. 3. Construction of a portion of said project shall commence within one year from the date of final approval unless a time extension is granted, other- wise said approval shall become null , void and of no effect whatsoever. 4. Prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contem- plated by this approval , the applicant shall first obtain permits and/or clearance from the following agencies: Riverside County Department of Health Palm Desert Architectural Commission City Fire Marshal Coachella Valley Water District Palm Desert Water and Services District Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to the department of building and safety at the time of issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. 5. Trash provisions shall be approved by applicable trash company and city prior to issuance of building permit. 6. Projects shall pay school impact mitigation fees of $628 per unit or as arranged with the Desert Sands Unified School District. Department of Public Works: 1 . Drainage and signalization fund fees, as required by city ordinance, shall be paid prior to grading permit issuance. 2. Storm drain construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study by the private engineer that is approved by the department of public works. 3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. safety lighting, as required 3. Full public improvements, including traffic y g g, q by ordinance and the director of public works, shall be installed in accordance with city standards. 4. Complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the city engineer for checking and approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. The engineer shall submit "as-built" plans prior to the acceptance of the improvements by the city. 5. All private driveways and parking lots shall be inspected by the engineering department and a standard inspection fee shall be paid prior to grading permit issuance. 6. Landscaping maintenance on San Pascual and Santa Rosa shall be provided by the property owner. 7. Complete grading plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the city engineer for checking and approval prior to issuance of any permits. 8. Dedication of five feet of right-of-way on Santa Rosa and San Pascual shall be done prior to issuance of any permits and approval of plans. 9. Installation of curb, gutter and matching paving and sidewalk on Santa Rosa and sidewalk on San Pascual . 10. Close unused driveway on San Pascual with full height curb and gutter. 11 . Offsite improvement plans to be approved by public works department and a surety posted to guarantee the required offsite improvements prior to grading permit issuance. 12. Size, number and location of driveways to public works specifications with only two driveway approaches to be allowed to serve this property. 13. Only one driveway approach shall be allowed along Santa Rosa with a maximum width of thirty feet. 14. Line of sight across the corner of San Pascual and Santa Rosa shall be forty feet. City Fire Marshal : 1. Install a water system capable of delivering 2500 GPM fire flow from any fire hydrant for a 2 hour duration in addition to domestic supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating 4 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement. 2. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants so that no point of any building is more than 250 feet from a fire hydrant measured along approved vehicular travel ways. a. exterior surface of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. b. curbs shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. C. hydrants shall not be located closer than 25 feet to any building. 3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and three copies of the water system plan to the fire marshal for review. Upon approval , one copy will be sent to the building department and the original will be returned to the developer. 4. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and approved by the water company with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system in PP 86-20 is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the fire marshal". 5. Prior to delivery of combustible materials to the building site, the required water system shall be installed, operating and delivering the required flow. 6. Additional fire protection requirements may be necessary when the applicant submits specific plans for consideration and approval . /dig 5 .. .... . . .. ... . .. .. 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 May 16, 1986 CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOVICE CASE NO. PP 86-20 6 VAR 86-3 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing, will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by 808 COTY for approval of a precise plan and side yard variance to allow construction of a five unit apartment project on the northeast corner of Santa Rose Way and San Pascual Avenue, more particularly described as: I Lot 22 of Palm Village Garden Tract RANCHO. ROAD forme r) 44th 4 V F FR D PEL4 SANTA R 0 S A - a WAY 7 U) f � � O - =S.O R-2 S P - . CATALINA - AY 2 4 S.0 z7� ~ SAID public hearing will beheld on Tuesday, June 3, 1986 at 7:00 p.m. In the Council Chamber at the Palm Desert City Hall, 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all Interested persons are Invited to attend and be heard. If you challenge the proposed actions In court, you may be limited to raising only those Issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the city council (or planning commission) at, or prior to, the public hearing. PUBLISH: Desert Post RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary May 23, 1986 Palm Desert Planning Commission CITY OF PALM DESERT MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission FROM: Philip Drell , Associate Planner DATE: June 3, 1986 SUBJECT: PP 86-20, VAR 86-3 APPLICANT: ROB COTY 2005 Noya Palos Verdes Estates, CA 90274 This item, a five unit apartment project for the northeast corner of San Pascual and Santa Rosa was advertized for public hearing on June 3rd. It was reviewed by the architectural commission on May 27 where major revisions were recommended. The applicant has requested a two week continuance to incorporate the architectural commission's recommendations into their plans. RECOMMENDATION: That planning commission grant a two week continuance. Philip Drell: Associate Planner PD/dig PROOF OF PULICATION This space IsforokCou-rtyClerk'sFiling Stamp 1_ LIVED (2ous c.c.P.) '86 !')fly 27 �� 8 p6 EdITY GL�RKB STATE OF. CALIFORNIA, County of Riverside CITY OF PALM DESERT I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to Proof of Publication of or interested in the above-entitled matter. I CASE NO. PP 56-20 am the principal clerk of the printer of the .......................................................... DESERT POST CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE .................................................... CASE NO.PP 8&20 a newspaper of general circulation, printed NOT ICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by BOB COTY for approval of a five unit apartment project on the northeast corner of B i—Week 1 y Santa Rosa Way and San Pascual Avenue,more particularly described and published ................................•• as: Lot 22 of Palm.Vlllage Garden Tract In the City Of ...P.3�tn..D636i•C•••.......... SAID public.hearing will be held on Tuesday,June 3,1985 at 7:00 p.m. Y in the Council Chamber at the Palm Desert City Hall,73.510 Fred War. County of Riverside, and which news- Ing Drive,Palm Desert,California,at which time and place all interested paper has been adjudged a newspaper eeddracctons in are i coin,you to maybe limited to rai and be heard.If sing only thou osetsshe ues you of general circulation by the Superior or someone else raised at the public hearing described In this notice,or in written correspondence delivered to the city council (or planning Court of the County of Riverside, State of commission)at,or prior to,the public hearing. Ramon A Diaz,Secretary California,under the dateof.MZL, lq 6 ' Palm Desert Planning Commission (Pub.D.P.May 23,1986) Case Number . 83658 - that the notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpareil), has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: 5/23 .................................................... all in the year 19.86.. I certify (or declare) under penalty of Rerjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated at....?.aJm.P.1 seF.F................... California,this.23.rd..dayof...Max, 1986„ ign Lure !/ Free copies of this bunt form maybe secured from: CALIFORNIA NEWSPAPER SERVICE BUREAU, INC. Legal Advertising Clearing House 120 West Second St., Los Angeles,-Calif. 90012 Telephone: (213) 625.2541 Plash reauosl 0 E Al E E AL Proof of►IAficalian When"derma this term. MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 3, 1986 landscaping would meet the approval of the neighbor and asked Mr. Leung if he acquiesced to this condition. Mr. Leung answerec affirmatively. Chairman Crites asked if anyone present wished to speak in FAVOR or OPPOSITION to the proposed. There being no one, the public testimony was closed. Commissioner Richards stated tnat while the original plan was much better, he could see no reason to deny the change '-and. moved for approval . Chairman Crites stated that the new Plan was less desirable and felt that basing the, changes on a financial institution was bad planning. Action: Moved by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner Downs, adopting the findings as presented by staff. Carried 2-0-1 (Chairman Crites voted no. ) Moved by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner Downs, adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 1149, approving PP 86-10 (Amendment #1 ) . Carried 2-0-1 (Chairman Crites voted no. ) i B. Case Nos. PP 86-20 nd VAR 86-3 - ROB COTY, Applicant Request for a five unit apartment project located at the northeast corner of San Pascual .and Santa Rosa. Mr. Diaz explained that a continuance was being requested to the meeting of June 17, 1986. Chairman Crites ooened the public testimony and asked if anyone present wished to speak in FAVOR or OPPOSITION to the proposed. There being no on , Chairman Crites requested a motion for continuance. Action: Moved by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner Downs, continuing PP 86-20 and VAR 86-3 to June 17, 1986. Carried 3-0. 4 '� • � G�.��T oil �I1�n. �p ���rPt� 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 June 17, 1986 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION ACTION CASE NO: 305 MF APPLICANT AND ADDRESS) : ROB COTY, 2005 Noya, Palos Verdes Estates, CA 90274. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval for a five unit apartment project. LOCATION: Northeast corner of San Pascual Avenue and Santa Rosa Way. ZONE: R-3 -------------------------------------------------- Upon reviewing the submitted plans and presentations by staff and by the applicant, the architectural commission granted preliminary approval subject to conditions. Date of Action: June 10, 1986 Vote: Carried 5-0 (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen ( 15) days of the date of the decision. ) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ STAFF COMMENTS: Please read the attached minutes. 1, MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION JUNE 10, 1986 Commissioner Cook felt that drive-thru restaurants, with proper integration could work in the city and noted that not every lot could handle a drive-thru restaurant. It was moved by Commissioner Cook, seconded by Commissioner Martin that the commission feels that it would not be inappropriate to have a drive-thru restaurant on this site which had good architecture and landscaping. Motion carried 4-1 (Chairman Gregory opposed) . It was moved by Commissioner Martin, seconded by Commissioner Drury to note the commission's endorsement of the location of the service station on the corner. Carried 5-0. 2. CASE NO: 305 MF APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): ROB COTY, 2005 Noya, Palos Verdes Estates, CA 90274. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval for a five unit apartment project. LOCATION: Northeast corner of San Pascual Avenue and Santa Rosa Way. ZONE: R-3 Mr. Drell explained that the applicant had made some changes that the commission had requested and that he would be requesting a variance for one parking space. Commissioner Cook felt that the plan had improved but thought that the parking problem could be worked out without asking for a variance. Mr. Drell made a suggestion that the wall be replaced with posts which would give extra space to provide additional parking. It was moved by Commissioner Cook, seconded by Commissioner Drury to grant preliminary approval subject to the following conditions. 1 . Consideration for the reduced widths of the main building to provide for the required setbacks. 2. The parking lot layout to be changed to provide spaces required. P 9 Y 9 P P q Motion carried 5-0 5 1 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 June 3, 1986 ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION ACTION CASE NO: 305 MF APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) ROB COTY, 2005 Noya, Palos Verdes Estates, CA 90274. NATURE OF PROJECT 1APPROVAL i SOUGT: Prelimi narY approval apartment for a five unit LOCATION: Northeast corner of San Pascual Ave nue and Santa Rosa Way. ZONE: R-3 ---------------------------------- Upon reviewing the submitted plans and presentations by staff and by the applicant, the architectural commission continued this case for restudy. Date of Action: May 27, 1986 Vote: Carried 5-0 (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen ( 15) days of the date of the decision. ) --------------------------------- STAFF COMMENTS: Please read the attached minutes. MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION MAY 27. 1986 1 . That the height be lowered 6" to comply with code requirements. 2. That additional sun protection be provided for south, east and west elevations. 3. That access from the parking lot be provided to all units. Motion carried 5-0 2. CASE NO: 305 MF APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): ROB COTY, 2005 Noya, Palos Verdes Estates, CA 90274. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval for a five unit apartment project. LOCATION: Northeast corner of San Pascual Avenue and Santa Rosa Way. ZONE: R-3 Mr. Drell explained that there was some concern with the parking spaces backing onto the street. He also felt that some restudy of the east elevation should be done and that the landscape plan was conceptual . Commissioner Martin felt that the project had some good points but thought that the site plan and parking problem needed some restudy. He recommended that the balconies be solid. Commissioner Cook was concerned with a two story building having only a five foot setback from property line. He suggested that the building be situated with a north-south exposure and that the building provide an additional ten feet in the rear parking area. Moved by Commissioner Cook, seconded by Commissioner Holden to continue this item for restudy. Carried 5-0 3. CASE NO: 304 MF APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): HARRY SCHMITZ, P.O. Box 3992, Palm Desert, CA 92260. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of a six unit senior housing apartment project. 7 V AGENDA ITEM NO: III-B-8 DATE: MAY 27, 1986 ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION CASE NO: 305 MF APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) : ROB COTY, 2005 Noya, Palos Verdes Estates, CA 90274. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval for a five unit apartment project. LOCATION: Northeast corner of San Pascual Avenue and Santa Rosa Way. ZONE: R-3 BACKGROUND: Proposal is for a five unit, two story (20 feet) apartment project. Architecture will be southwest pueblo style. Overall architecture concept appears acceptable although east elevation should be enhanced. As is common in small lot apartment projects, applicant has had trouble fitting the required parking in the site. Eight spaces are served by a common driveway. Two open spaces simply back out onto Santa Rosa Way. The projects common recreation area is in the front yard enclosed by a six foot wall on the property line. The plan diverges from ordinance standards in the following areas: 1 . Side yard setback is five feet instead of ten feet. Applicant feels that the additional five feet is better utilized as part of the large common front yard. 2. Two compact 8' X 18' parking spaces have been employed. One of these spaces is located right on the San Pascual property line. Code requires a six foot setback. Applicant proposed to completely screen this space with a six foot block wall . RECOMMENDATION: Indicate conceptual approval of southwestern style but direct applicant to provide additional details for eastern elevation. There is not sufficient landscape detail to review. Provide planning commission with comments concerning overall concept. PD/dlg 1 tx\FIED S Desert Sands Unified School District a BERMUDA DUNES r RANCHO MIRAGE 82-879 HIGHWAY 111 • INDIO, CALIFORNIA 92201-5678• (619) 347-8631 1' INDIAN WELLS H PALM DESERT �b June 30 1986 d` LA OUINTA 'D, INDIO )� Mr. Ramon Diaz , Director Environmental Services City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Drive , Palm Desert, CA 92260 Re : PP 86-20 Applicant , Rob Coty Dear Mr. Diaz : The referenced project will impact Desert Sands Unified School District. Please r q mitigation fees . SinJyo Richard M. Beck Facilities Planner RMB/vmm fte lt ✓ut eI4"Ifol p'Aftl �"s19Pe7MEa; £ar O pp��rrt 77ak0IVED 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNrFIS42b�4 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 MAY 141986 AM PM 7181900010 1112N31415 6 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO(S): PROJECT: APPLICANT: �j [ .� Rdos V C-ti^cues, c (sa Enclosed please find materials describing a project for which the following is eing7 L( requested: /� �e/�C SC NCz - 1 W1 A- The attached data was prepared by the applicant and is being forwarded to you for comments and recommended conditions of approval. The city is interested in the probable impacts on the environment (including land, air, water, minerals, flora, fauna, noise objects of historical or aesthetic significance) and recommended conditions of approval based on your expertise and area of concern. Your comments and recommended conditions of approval must be received by this office prior to 4:30 p.m, ry 6 in order to be discussed by the land division committee. The land di ision' in (comprised of director of environmental services, city building official, city engineer, fire marshal and a representative of CVWD) will discuss the comments and recommended conditions of approval and will forward them to the planning commission through the staff report. Any information received by this office after the receipt deadline will not be discussed by the land division committee. Sincerely, RAMON A. DIAZ DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES RD/lr Attachments PLEASE RETURN MAP WTTH 'lip fp�c tTc 1 CITY OF PALM DESERT DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission DATE: June 17, 1986 CASE NO: PP 86-20 and VAR 86-3 REQUEST: Approval of a precise plan and side yard variance to allow construction of a five unit apartment project within the R-3 zone located on the northeast corner of Santa Rosa Way and San Pascual Avenue. APPLICANT: ROB COTY DAVID DUGDALE 2005 Noya Place. 46-618 Madison #j42 Palos Verdes Estates, CA Indio, CA 92201 1. BACKGROUND: A. ADJACENT ZONING/LAND USE: North: R-3 S.O./Single family South: R-2 S.O./Multi family East: R-3 S.O./Multi family West: R-3 S.O./Multi family B. PROJECT DATA: Project Ordinance Requirement Site Area 13,000 sq. ft. (gross) No. of Units 5 5 Unit Mix 4 - 2 bd, I bath, 850 sq. ft. 800 sq. ft. I - 2 bd, 2 bath, 1120 sq. ft. Building Height 22 feet 22 feet Building Coverage 31% 50% maximum Landscape Open Space 36% Setbacks - Front 15 feet 15 feet Interior 5 feet 10 feet Street Side 10 feet 10 feet Parking 10 spaces 10 spaces (6 covered) (5 covered) C. ANALYSIS: The project consists of a two story flat roofed southwestern pueblo style building containing five apartments. Parking is located off of San Pascual on the north side of the lot. The current proposal represents a substantial revision of the plan originally presented to the architectural commission. Although the 1 { PP 86-20 E VAR 86-3 original plan was in technical compliance with the zoning ordinance, the architectural commission identified several design problems which necessitated revision of the site plan as well as architecture. The lot, after five foot right of way dedications on both San Pablo and Santa Rosa measures 79.25' (Santa Rosa frontage) X 149' (San Pascual frontage) . In the original design the building's length ran north-south consistent with the length of the lot. This orientation resulted in three problems. 1 . The front of the building facing west, could not be protected from the intense afternoon summer sun. Normally the pueblo style works best with a south exposure where the large overhangs can shade the building and glass during most summer hours. 2. The rear parking area width was restricted forcing three open spaces to be located in the front setback backing out onto Santa Rosa. 3. The property to the east was exposed to the maximum length of two story elevation. The architectural commission recommended that the building be rotated 90% to face south solving the solar exposure problem, providing room in the parking lot for an additional three spaces and reducing the length of the two story elevation facing the adjacent property from 75 feet to 42 feet. The revision was facilitated by reducing the total building length to 64 feet narrowing each unit to 20 feet in width. Unfortunately the new plan requires the granting of a side yard variance reducing the eastern building setback from 10 feet to 5 feet. The situation is further complicated by the additional five foot right of way dedication. The architectural commission felt that the significant overall improvement of the project justified the variance. The benefits to the adjacent property owner of the substantially shorter two story exposure far outweigh the possible sight line benefits of the additional five foot setback. Heavy landscaping will be required to further soften the impact. D. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL OF PRECISE PLAN: 1 . The proposed use is of higher design quality and of similar Intensity and type as surrounding uses and therefore will not depreciate property values in the vicinity. 2 J PP 86-20 d VAR 86-3 2. The proposed project will not endanger the public health, safety or general welfare. 3. The proposed project will not interfere with the use or enjoyment of property in the vicinity by occupants thereof for lawful purposes. 4. The project is consistent with the zoning ordinance (except for approved variance) the general plan and specifically implements the neighborhood improvement goals of the Palm Village Specific Plan. E. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL OF VARIANCE: 1 . The strict enforcement of the ten foot side yard requirement would significantly restrict the livability of the proposed units or result in an alternative design which would be more detrimental to the adjacent property owner. 2. The additional five foot right of way dedication required of this property further restricts site planning alternatives relative to other properties in the vicinity. 3. The strict interpretation of the ordinance in this case would severely restrict the property owners ability to develop the five units allowed by the zone and meet the other goals and objectives of the ordinance. 4. The site plan permitted by the variance allows development of a higher quality project with a net benefit to the public health, safety, and general welfare. 111. RECOMMENDATION: Approve findings and adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. approving PP 86-20 and VAR 86-3 subject to conditions. Prepared byr-� Reviewed and Approved by /dlg 3 i PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PRECISE PLAN AND SIDE YARD VARIANCE TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A FIVE UNIT APARTMENT PROJECT LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SANTA ROSA WAY AND SAN PASCUAL AVENUE. CASE NO: PP 86-20 a VAR 86-3 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 17th day of June, 1986 hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider a request by ROB COTY for approval of a five unit apartment project located on a 13,000 square foot lot within the R-3 S.O. zone at the northeast corner of Santa Rosa Way and San Pascual Avenue. WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedures for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 80-89", in that the director of community develop- ment has determined that the project is a class 3 categorical exemption. WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testi- mony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said planning commission did find the following facts to exist to justify their actions. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL OF PRECISE PLAN: 1 . The proposed use is of higher design quality and of similar intensity and type as surrounding uses and therefore will not depreciate property values in the vicinity. 2. The proposed project will not endanger the public health, safety or general welfare. 3. The proposed project will not interfere with the use or enjoyment of property in the vicinity by occupants thereof for lawful purposes. 4. The project is consistent with the zoning ordinance (except for approved variance) the general plan and specifically implements the neighborhood improvement goals of the Palm Village Specific Plan. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL OF VARIANCE: 1 . The strict enforcement of the ten foot side yard requirement would significantly restrict the livability of the proposed units or result in an alternative design which would be more detrimental to the adjacent property owner. 2. The additional five foot right of way dedication required of this property further restricts site planning alternatives relative to other properties in the vicinity. j PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3. The strict interpretation of the ordinance in this case would severely restrict the property owners ability to develop the five units allowed by the zone and meet the other goals and objectives of the ordinance. 4. The site plan permitted by the variance allows development of a higher quality project with a net benefit to the public health, safety, and general welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT. RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1 . That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the commission in this case. 2. Precise Plan 86-20 and VAR 86-3 are hereby approved subject to attached conditions. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 17th day of June, 1986 by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: BUFORD CRITES, Chairman ATTEST: RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary /dlg 2 , PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO. PP 86-20 8 VAR 86-3 Department of Community Development: 1 . The development of the property shall conform substantially with exhibits on file with the department of community development, as modified by the following conditions. 2. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein which are in addition to all municipal ordinances and state and federal statutes now in force, or which hereafter may be in force. 3. Construction of a portion of said project shall commence within one year from the date of final approval unless a time extension is granted, other- wise said approval shall become null , void and of no effect whatsoever. 4. Prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contem- plated by this approval , the applicant shall first obtain permits and/or clearance from the following agencies: Riverside County Department of Health Palm Desert Architectural Commission City Fire Marshal Coachella Valley Water District Palm Desert Water and Services District Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to the department of building and safety at the time of issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. 5. Trash provisions shall be approved by applicable trash company and city prior to issuance of building permit. 6. Projects shall pay school impact mitigation fees of $628 per unit or as arranged with the Desert Sands Unified School District. Department of Public Works: 1 . Drainage and signalization fund fees, as required by city ordinance, shall be paid prior to grading permit issuance. 2. Storm drain construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study by the private engineer that is approved by the department of public works. 3 u PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3. Full public improvements, including traffic safety lighting, as required by ordinance and the director of public works, shall be installed in accordance with city standards. 4. Complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the city engineer for checking and approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. The engineer shall submit "as-built" plans prior to the acceptance of the improvements by the city. 5. All private driveways and parking lots shall .be inspected by the engineering department and a standard inspection fee shall be paid prior to grading permit issuance. 6. Landscaping maintenance on San Pascual and Santa Rosa shall be provided by the property owner. 7. Complete grading plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the city engineer for checking and approval prior to issuance of any permits. B. . Dedication of five feet of right-of-way on Santa Rosa and San Pascual shall be done prior to issuance of any permits and approval of plans. 9. Installation of curb, gutter and matching paving and sidewalk on Santa Rosa and sidewalk on San Pascual . 10. Close unused driveway on San Pascual with full height curb and gutter. 11 . Offsite improvement plans to be approved by public works department and a surety posted to guarantee the required offslte improvements prior to grading permit issuance. 12. Size, number and location of driveways to public works specifications with only two driveway approaches to be allowed to serve this property. 13. Only one driveway approach shall be allowed along Santa Rosa with a maximum width of thirty feet. 14. Line of sight across the corner of San Pascual and Santa Rosa shall be forty feet. City Fire Marshal : 1 . Install a water system capable of delivering 2500 GPM fire flow from any fire hydrant for a 2 hour duration in addition to domestic supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating 4 u i 1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement. 2. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants so that no point of any building is more than 250 feet from a fire hydrant measured along approved vehicular travel ways. a. exterior surface of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. b. curbs shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. C. hydrants shall not be located closer than 25 feet to any building. 3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and three copies of the water system plan to the fire marshal for review. Upon approval, one copy will be sent to the building department and the original will be returned to the developer. 4. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and approved by the water company with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system in PP 86-20 is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the fire marshal". 5. Prior to delivery of combustible materials to the building site, the required water system shall be installed, operating and delivering the required flow. 6. Additional fire protection requirements may be necessary when the applicant submits specific plans for consideration and approval . /dlg 5 I i ( 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 May 16, 1986 CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOYIcE CASE ND. PP 86-20 8 VAR 86-3 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by 808 COTY for approval of a precise plan and side yard variance to allow construction of a five unit apartment project on the northeast corner of Santa Rosa Way and San Pascual Avenue, more particularly described as: Lot 22 of Palm Village Garden Tract RANCHO ROAD - -3 ( fcrmerlv 44th 4Vr FR D Tel 1 SANTA ROSA ¢ J N F a '- N —ILi F 0 . C A T A L I NA - A y W 2 S.0 W SAID public hearing will beheld on Tuesday, June 3. 1986 at 7:00 p.m. In the Council Chamber at the Palm Desert City Hall, 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all Interested persons are -Invited to attend and be heard. If you challenge the proposed actions In court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described In this notice. or in written correspondence delivered to the city council (or planning commission) at, or prior to, the public hearing. PUBLISH: Desert Post RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretaryli May 23. 1986 Palm Desert Planning Commission 0�� Palm. eUe Water UVater & Serviced 73trict 44.500 PORTOLA AVENUE BOX 161 PALM DESERT, CALIFOR� \1�� BOARD OF DIRECTORS: 1UI fit', �'" �� Phone:(619)346-6338 ROBERT C. H. LAWMAN, President R. CLAIR McDONOUGH MAY 2 SHARON K. EPPS 2 ISSE PHYLLIS GRIGGS, District Secretary COMMUNITY DEVELOWdENT DEPARf14May 20, 1986 CITY Or PALM DESERT Mr. Ramon Diaz Director of Environmental Services City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, California 92260 Re: Case No. PP 86-20 Rob Coty 5-Unit Apartment Complex Lot 22 of Palma Village Garden Tract Santa Rosa Way at San Pascual Avenue Dear Mr. Diaz : In response to your letter regarding the above referenced project, we would like to make the following comments: 1. A frontage fee of $15. 00 per foot will be imposed along San Pascual Avenue. 2. The District will install a lZ-inch water meter and service at a cost of $1 , 350 each. 3. The water service installation charges will be as follows: a. One 11,-inch water meter and service $1, 350 at $1 ,350 each k b. Frontage fee for -144 feet. at $15. 00/foot 2 , 160 TOTAL $3 ,510 4 . All meter installation charges and frontage fees must be paid before installation work will begin. 5 . An approved 1,-inch backflow prevention device must be installed as part of the plumbing. 6. At least one week advance notice should be given prior to service installation. Mr. Ramon Diaz May 20 , 1986 Page Two 7 . The plan indicates that certain improvements are to be located over our existing water main along the northerly property line. The owner shall execute an agreement that provides that if at any time in the future the water main requires repair, the owner shall pay for all costs related to the repair including removal and replacement--6f the-improvements in the vicinity of the required repair. 8 . The addition of any new fire hydrants or the relocation of any existing, if required by the City Fire Marshall, would be completed at an additional cost to be determined upon request. All costs would be paid for by the developer. 9. A fire sprinkler service connection is to be completed at the expense of the developer according to the District' s standard, a copy of which is attached. We request that a copy of the conditions of approval be sent to us. If you have any questions in regard to the above, please contact us. Very truly yours, Robert C. H. Lawman, President RL: sg cc: Mainiero, Smith and Associates, Inc. NOTES 1. Water main to be hot tapped unless approved by the District. 5/9"WATER ME7FRPREC/S/OU F/ERSEY 2 Installation to be done by 7R APPROVED EQUAL (5/ZE DETERM/!EO the developer and inspected ,� WD GUSTALLED 6Y7NE 0/STR/CT) and approved by the B"M,f/ VALVE BOXA 0 COVEe- District 4/ATER AfETER g FgOKS 3RT OR APPkV t1!FD 3G' EOX-BPOOKS PRODLCTS ,UO3 3 The DIStY 't ShOUId e Hi1K Oe,4PPWkLc0 CURB, GUTTER EQUAL, ,4CP TO BE U5ED contacted for all EQUAL. FOE E/5Ee tees and charges. - STREET .� vs - G9TE VAL VE-CL OW 507D,MUEL L ER D-/SO OR 4PPAOVED EQUAL. BR.JSS G4TE VALVES- 5TA,UDARD G/E/GL1T 0A110 GATE VALVE TAPPIM5 SLEEVE BRASS P,'PE ARID 6,e,41RVP,POVEO ECIUAL LATER MA/U F/TTLUGS TAP FOR AL LJA TER METEe P/P/,UG TO BU/LD/,UGEll CF%ECK VAL VE- CM!/CMC MUELLER A-7WZ.,(5 CZaW e/CN 6EE/E5 /5 /D 64_STEEL Q.P. APP,EOVED EOCL4L (SIZE ['AP/ES) (SIZE VARIES) 1 /O 64 T.9PP%l,G SLEEYE- C4!Cibj2 PIPING (SIZE IARIESJ BdKER SERIES 429 OR APP,ft7VED EQUAL. (SIZE VAR/ES) L_ 51,9-METER FOR 2;3; OR 4" CHECK VAL VE 3/4" METER FOR 6"A.VD B" CHECK ✓QLVF. API`_ItOVED '! V - 1 J-Q rj IRE MARSHAL DATE Malnlero, Smith Cc Associates, Inc. APPRO D BY PALM DESERT /^' / WATER AND SERVICES DISTRICT Owl k f:nuironmenfal lingineenng may`=(�!__..;,'l:.-'---_� 'k� Bunko P.1T m Cen DIS RICT ENGINEER p FIRE SPRINKLER CONNECTION me.T.— W0111uA ways, v3al.Palms cneza�2ao� hTE Z6G6 O STANDARD ,,,,, ,,,,,,,, ,r,im ��n.oa D TE RC E. NO_ t Y - y _ 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NON: PROJECT: APPLICANT: Enclosed please find materials describing a project for which the following is being-7 g7 L( requested: , tee 1Jct,,� � 1_5� G�c 6� �i— l SCfn �e s�L WA-`{ cw,cL''. The attached data was prepared by the applicant and is being forwarded to you for comments and recommended conditions of approval. The city is interested in the probable impacts on the environment (including land, air, water, minerals, flora, fauna, noise objects of historical or aesthetic significance) and recommended conditions of approval based on your expertise and area of concern. Your comments and recommended condit committee. The L ions of approval must be received by this office Prior to 4:30p.m. ) ) , in order to be discussed by the land division ana division I committee (comprised of director of environmental services, city building official, city engineer, fire marshal and a representative of CVWD) will discuss the comments and recommended conditions of approval and will forward them to the planning commission through the staff report. Any information received by this office after the receipt deadline will not be discussed by the land division committee. Sincerely, RAMON A. DIAZ DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES RD/Ir Attachments PLEASE RETURN MAP WITH COMMENTS ERT WATER & SERVICES DISTRICT TIC WATER SYSTEM MAP Q^�1 xn.mea?ss,a¢,seeae.wvc�cwurtr,s..rt au�waew. W r o yn.oyrerz yrYe:r-4oN •. Yili- MANIERO.SNITN AND ASSOCIATES,INC. "> C L AND ENVIRONMENTAL EN GINEERNG PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA ' JUNE 1984 .� . I.. .L i HH I — �. j ....—........... —..—— m .. U6 4z 2,F dray (fir Lane, Peom Does C&22260 . . ENVIROR ASSESSMICi T ti1PPUC TUCH PORN : department ®4 wMmauawaoaaU0 d1m0mOaan ^ TO THE APPLICANT: Your cooperation in completing this form and supplying the information requested will expedite City review of your application pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. The City is required to make an environmental assessment on all projects which it exercises discretionary approval over. Applications submitted will not be considered complete until all information necessary to make the environmental assessment is complete. GENERAL INFORIMTION: 1 . Name, address, and telephone number of owner, applicant or project sponsor: Rob Cot,,. Applicant 2005 Noya Palos Verdes Estates, CA 90274 (213)541-9103 2. Name, address and telephone number of person to be contacted con- cerning the project (such as architect, engineer, or other repre- sentative) : ft� ter at aMMM OW - Dw6 6'47C t6-b/81Aaal:son na42. 2nd:o CA• 9 (ten22o1 l619)347 -So9b 3. Common name of project (if any) : None 4. Project location (street address or general location) : Northeast corner of Santa Rosa Way & San Pasqual 5. Precise legal description of property (lot and tract number,' or meets & bounds): Lot 22 of Palm Village Garden Tract as recorded in Bonk 21 Pages 56-57 of Official Records 6. Proposed use of the site (project for which the form is filed; describe the total undertaking, not just the current application approval being sought) : Apa.,+r' ,r,+s - residential !L NIFKO/ t1 1 t IrlagblMMnrpb, 1 7. Relationship to a larger project or series of projects (describe how this project relates to other activities, phases, and develop- ments planned, or now underway) : None 8. List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, to go forward, including those required by the City, Regional , State and Federal agencies (indicate sub- sequent approval agency name, and type of approval required) : EXISTING CONDITIONS: 9. Project site area: 0.28 ac. + Size of property in sq.-ft. or acreage) 10. Present zoning: R-z (Proposed zoning) : R-2 11 . General Plan land use designation: Med, Density Residential 12. Existing use of the project site: Vacant 13. Existing use on adjacent properties: (Example - North, Shopping Center; South, Single Family Dwellings; East, Vacant, etc. ). north, single family residential; east, ° 3-%w%:+ tits. south, apartments; west, residential 14. Site topography (describe) : Vacant level subdivision lot 15. Are there any natural or manmade drainage channels through or adjacent to the property? NO X YES 16. Grading (estimate number of cubic yards of dirt being moved) : 17. List the number, size and type of trees being removed: No trees on site 18. Describe any cultural , historic, or scenic aspects of the project site: None Env. Assessment 2 19. Residential Project (if not residential do NOT answer) A. Number and type of dwelling units (Specify no- of bedrooms) : S APa merS'}- Vn;+s wA 2- b't'1r00'As Ga.& B. Schedule of unit sizes: UA,4-s 1- 912 set. FI . U has 1344 g -r4 C. Number of stories Z Height 20 feet. D. Largest single building (sq. ft. ) 4 9 9 Z- (hgt. ) ' Z O E. Type of household size expected (population projection for the project) : Sina%les 0.4 GovQ`eS F. Describe the number and type of recreational facilities : and concrete Fia�w�rk -G-c- s,jn -hann not G. Is there any night lighting of the project: y,-.S H. Range of sales prices or rents: $ 4-0 to $ 6 00 I . Percent of total project devoted to: Building . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4v % Paving, including streets. . . . . . . . . . . 3 0 % Landscaping, Open, Recreation Area . . . . . . . S 0 % 3 Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects : Discuss below all items checked yes (attach additional sheets as necessary). YES NO 21 . Change in existing features of hillsides, or substantial alteration of ground contours. X 22. Change in the dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in the project vicinity. X i 23. Subject to or resulting in soil errosion by wind or flooding. X 24. Change in ground water quality or quantity, or alteration of existing drainage patterns. X Lot will be graded for future ap&P+r e,++ aWwiwwWA� 25. Change in existing noise or vibration level in the vicinity. Subject to roadway or airport noise (has the required acoustical report been submitted?) Slight increase in vehicular X traffic due to residential use of the site 26. Involves the use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic substances , flammables or explosives. X 27. Involves the use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy. X 28. Changes the demand for municipal services (police, fire, sewage, etc. ) Due to X residential use of the site the project will create a small increase in the demand for municipal services. 29. Changes the demand for utility services, beyond those presently available or planned in the near future. X 30. Significantly affects any unique or natural features, including mature trees. X 31 . Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or public land or public roads. X 32. Results in the dislocation of people. X 5 YES 140 33. Generates controversy based on aesthetics or other features of the project. X [ J Additional explanation of "yes" answers attached. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation, to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. 2�l�'0,,- CDTY 6z,7)— Name Print or Type For Z/ 9� Signatiare Date �TTT11T O.T.ImV E.on. 6 '' RIVERSIDE COUNTY �4p�E of C44p°q�i9 `1 `• FIREDEPARTMENT IN COOPERATION WITH THE _'"�?r CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY o p tiR IIII'Llrs/DE :,c . RAY HEBRARD '9�yENT of I -- FIRE CHIEF 210 WEST SAN JACINTO AVENUE M� Q9.1 a� . .� PERRIS,CALIFORNIA 92370 S. TELEPHONE:(714)657.3183 Raymon Diaz 1/ D Planning and Community &4 y Development Director 5 1986 73510 Fred Waring COM4:UNITYo,I,Erorr�,r;roEP Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 CITY , EtOPg NT DE rMENr Reference: PPg6-gip Applicant: Ra6 CDTy Dear Mr. Ramon Diaz The following fire protection requirements are in accordance with the Uniform Fire Code and Life Safety Code standards. 1 . Install a water system capable of deliveringZ5u -GPM fire flow from any fire hydrant for a 2 hour duration in addition to domestic supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement. - 2. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants so that no point of any building is _ more than 25o feet from a fire hydrant measured along approved vehicular travel ways . a. exterior surface of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow, and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. b. curbs shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. c. hydrants shall not be located closer than 25 feet to any building. 3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and three copies of the water system plan to the Fire Marshal for review. Upon approval , one copy will be sent to the Building Department and the original will be returned to the developer. 4. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and approved by the water company with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system in PP is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Fire Marshal ." 5. Prior to delivery of combustible materials to the building site, the required water system shall be installed, operating and delivering the required flow. 6. Additional fire protection requirements may be necessary when the applicant submits specific plans for consideration and approval . 7. All buildings over K� square feet require an approved fire sprinkler system. Very truly yours , RAY HEBRARD Fire Chief/ By,rV %L741 l'I MIKE MCCONNELL Fire Marshal J +' INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUMr� ,, TO: DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES � 86 FROM : DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS crrp�`epo ,tDf£JPFRrNfrr SUBJECT: DATE - 1\AAY 2-) vVI-6& The following should be considered conditions of approval : © Drainage and signalization fund fees , as required by City ordinance , shall be paid prior to (a��=rdet-ltsa5=of--the=f- :na1 ma°Is"z=5 btHj:d3 ^Fe r m i t issuance) . fad,MCI 2 ) Drainage faci it ( es shall be provided, per Ordinance No . 218 and the Master Drainage Plan , to the specifications of the Director of Public Works . _ Storm drain construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study by the private engineer that is approved by the , Department of Public Works . ; J4 Full public Improvements , Including traffic safety lighting, as required by ordinance and the Director of Public Works , shall be Installed in accordance with City standards . 5 ) Improvement plans for water and sewer systems shall be approved by the respective service districts with "as-built" plans submitted to the Department of Public Works prior to the project final . O Complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted , as required by ordinance , to the City Engineer for checking and approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. The engineer shall submit "as-built" plans prior. to the acceptance of the improvements by the City. dr:v wJ ! { {ots 07 All privaten 'shail�b 1rt�pected by the engineering department and a standard Inspection fee shall be paid prior to ;( rsrda L f=t':he fLnaF-map1 (:�11YAPerm1t is- suance) . ��iadin� T] I a Sa"`�ha1"f' be 08 Landscaping maintenance on provided by the ssoFa. ian� (property owner ). t:�gAigow =$• 9) Existing utilities on shall be underground- ed per each respective utility district' s recommendation .. 10 ) Traffic safety striping on shall be provided to .the specifications of the Director of Public Works . A traffic control plan must be submitted to and approved by . the Director of Public Works before placing pavement , markings . 11 Complete grading plans and specifications shall be submit- ted , as required by ordinance , to the City Engineer for checking and approval prior to issuance of any permits . 12 Dedicatl �n of � �J feet of right-of-way ,, ,� IZ ` " shall be done Prior to i ssuance of o n 1,, f^- any permits and approval of plans . 13 Installation of curb and gutter , matching paving and s i d e w a 1 k on j si ^ ,ai • al Ci2v �aSCL�• 14 ) Waiver of access to except at approved locations shall be granted on the final map. Sa �a ua l 15 Close unused drivewaynwith full heighth curb and gutter .' 16 Offsite improvement plans to be approved by Public Works ' Department and a surety posted to guarantee the required ! offsite Improvements prior to (T=e-v-or-dat_Lo.n-of-'_the- f nal �Majx)A (permit issuance) . 1 7 ) FRI improvement of Interior streets based on (60' residen tial ) (private ) ( industrial ) street standards as established in accordance with Chapter 26, Section 26.40 . 040 , C. P. D. : Code . i 18) Installation of one-half landscaped median in or cash payment for one the cost of landscaped median ; , at the option of the Director of Public Works . "' 19) TraFfic analysis to be prepared for the project to address the specific Impacts on existing networks ( street and intersections ) and the proposed mitigation measures recom- mended for approval by the City. 20 ) installation of sewers to serve this project . 2t Size , number and location of driveways to Public Works i specifications with only t::uv) driveway approach (es ) to be allowed to serve this property. 22) No (new) requirements . (Original conditions apply) 23 ) Any permit issuance shall be subject to the waiver of parcel map first being approved and recorded. 24) Complete (parcel ) (tract ) map( s ) shall be submitted as required by ordinance to the City Engineer for checking and approval and be recorded before Issuance of certificate of occupancy by the Building Department . ICA - Ichard J . Fol 7err P. E . RA/RJF i i L' ii CE, FICATION OF PROPERTY OWNS. LIST. (To be filled out by applicant) CITY OF PALM DESERT Department of Environmental Services 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, CA 92260 Precise Plan Subject: Lot 22 of Palm Village Garden Tract MB 21/56-57 Gentlemen: I� Rob Coty , do hereby certify, under penalty of perjury, that the attached list sets forth the names and addresses of the following persons as they appear on the last equalized assessment roll of the Riverside County Assessor. Sincerely, Rob Coty Printed Name 2005 Noya Palos Verdes Estates, CA 90274 Address CSIV 3¢/-3i27 (JM) mi-am Phone Number Dated 7/z/�8� in the City of f." 11/XJre7— , California. Signatur ECISE PLAN APPLICATION NO. TO THE CITY OF PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION: APPLICANT'S NAME: R owner, purchaser, lessee, representative APPLICANT'S ADDRESS: 2005 Noya Palos Verdes Estates, CA 9-0274 APPLICANT'S PHONE: (213) 541-9103 PROJECT COORDINATOR: Winos PHONE: The applicant, Rob Coty for the property situated at on property zoned as R-2 , being legally described on the attached form. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE: NOTARIZATION OF OWNER'S PERMISSION I (we) do hereby certify, under penalty of perjury, that I (we) are the owner(s) of the real property legally described herein and hereby grant permission for which this application is madee/' ✓ .4, �' �%' 7 �6 Constantine Coty T Rita Coty (Signature) Date Please print name here 7,0 a.,-- A/0,10 P1,4 c� Address City f�C oS (11'6-fM 'L5rS STATE OF /C�ALIFORNIA', �/County of D5 )66 -5 On i before me, the undersigned a Notary Public in and for the State of California with principal office in the County of LOS An��iES , personally appeared Constantine Coty and Rita Coty, -p,& ably knawi;—�e—me t - -- ,p-ro_ved- to`�me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to bethe-_persons whose names are subscribed t0 the within Instrument, and acknowledged to me that OFFICIAL SEAL NANCY D JACOBS they executed the same. d p NOTARY PUBLIC -CALIFORNIA WITNE55 m hand and offi ial al. y t.CS ANGELES COUNTY My comm. expires JUL 10, 1988 Signature of Notary: Notat�!T in and the State of California STATEMEN SUPPORTING THE REQUESTED i _ CISE PLAN (15 Copies) Please state why the proposed precise plan should be approved based upon public necessity, general welfare, or good zoning practice. The proposed precise plan is required to permit the development of a g unit 49== in accordance with the present zoning of the. parcel.. The units will be developed in a manner comparable to newer projects on Santa Rosa and will be a complement to the general welfare of the neighborhood. EX. ,' LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROF _:TY (5 Copies) Lot 22 of Palm Village Garden Tract as recorded in Book 21 Pages 56-57 of Official Records Legal Description Approved by: Date• 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 May 16, 1986 CITY OF- PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE CASE NO. PP 86-20 E VAR 86-3 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by BOB COTY for approval of a precise plan and side yard variance to allow construction of a five unit apartment project on the northeast corner of Santa Rosa Way and San Pascual Avenue, more particularly described as: Lot 22 of Palm Village Garden Tract I Jul F` RANCHO ROAD Q. _31111111 IT t formeriv 44th 4V� FR D I U _ E. Ell T I i SANTA R 0 SA w J WAY g c - � 3 _ z - 0. o W ri CATALINI! . . - AY .• 2 S.0 �` _ F_ -- W SAID public hearing will beheld on Tuesday, June 3, 1986 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber at the Palm Desert City Hall , 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. If you challenge the proposed actions in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the city council (or planning commission) at, or prior to, the public hearing. PUBLISH: Desert Post RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary May 23, 1986 Palm Desert Planning Commission 1 f (a Pagan, Curtis A. Sontopietro, Ralph Sirois, Lionel 73790 Santa Rosa Way P.O. Box 1 166 5901 Warner Ave Palm Desert, CA. 92260 Rancho Mirage, CA. 92270 Huntington Bch, CA 92647 Holt, Otto Cordova, R. & Assoc. Spencer, Arline 70968 Lo Paz 6 Cadiz P.O. Box 194 Rancho Mirage CA 92270 Rancho Mirage, CA. 92270 Palm Desert, CA. 92260 Davis, Allen Young, James W. Rimer, Karl 881 Colle Paul P.O. Box 394 5319 Hillmont Palm Springs, CA 92262 Topeka, KS. 66603 Los Angeles, CA. 90041 White, John D. Valdez, Jesse F. Wood, Richard J. 73740 Santa Rosa Way 44215 San Pasqua] Ave. P.O. Box 2193 Palm Desert, CA. 92260 Palm Desert, CA. 92260 Palm Desert, CA. 92260 Carel, Lee Koo, Tsair Ming West, Ira 79188 Bog Walk 44050 San Posqual Ave. 17726 Tramonto Dr. Indio, CA. 92201 Palm Desert, CA. 92260 Pcfc. Palisades, CA. 90272 Granillo, Elias Chyz, Ernest J. Huntington, Lewis S. P.O. Box 0874 13630 Collins Dr. 2590 S. Sepulveda Blvd. Palm Springs, CA. 92263 Warren, MI. 48093 Los Angeles, CA. 90064 Weiss, Gerhard W. Palm Desert Investors Samuelson, Gary 74340 De Anza Way 1675 Rollins Rd. 283 C. East 17th St. Palm Desert, CA. 92260 Burlingame, CA. 94010 :osto Mesa, CA. 92627 DKN Association Gfroeder, Alfred M. Ban Pablos Properties Ltd. c/o Mr. Natarojon 73875 Santa Rosa Way 'C Vo MB Johnson Co. 661 N. 4th St. Palm Desert, CA. 92260 400 N. Tustin Ave. Ste 231 Banning, CA. 92260 3onta Ana, CA. 92703 Tachell, Joseph W. Millman, Sally Boyte, Gordon W. P.O. Box 53 13120 Moor Park Apt. 6 5336 Ocana Ave. Redondo Beach, CA. 90277 Sherman Oaks, CA. 91403 1 Lakewood, CA. 90713 Chapman House S & I Management Inc. 50 Lost River Dr. 401 N. Brookhurst Ste 108 Palm Desert, CA, 92260 Anaheim, CA. 92801 MAO�E- `^ U�JI6- cgL � ?�•�US LAA OC6� HU�TI•TfMNK - (ol°s fit"I'IN�iU viRIPIs � - -Rx 1- mac; — 4 xYL � CoN6: U M 3 P��'zP��sTfQt1M I�Mr°�N caF1=1�N U M . road a Ix NO TIVE-E;t;)!L w/ YaCoM?-a -RAt► jj • I _ S ( (`�•I!oL�!s INDiC.'� -- LA N �• �U e`i'o fs U5 'VIRIpISI [AND I34 I LA n I �q C 3 GALL IAN o I NEE-~ U!l.^Tc A I ° MAIO • �+ LAWN , � orul ! I • ! 3 IOL�Is ZIG-o1 Ili I`I o w .s Ucc i ....... .....• ........... ... { Q �x LU I - I F Z A4 I 5MAo-!�I-k:�j 710-U!N U�.- I LAW Nloc; Lew N v I pl o! 3 R1� I eu I a Ng �NOC- 3 r ' - Us 5 E-�e!I _ { % GI T►-f �•TI _I uulIA`N 11— I • • r I I • e* ALL�NDRA I i L-AT��� i i 7 �w 5�c. I �. / • , -- — M -_ ----5 — �i�I SCE s - sl N�N�!s --------- -,--- -- - -_ _ _.___ _.__ _.,._ _ .____.__._. _�.__._.—_ _•. __ _._-.__..__. .._______ _�..:-___. . -- � � �; ' � ��.'' I "..r'`e Dim ^, ��- I - + � _ UT� . I >, � ` '_--!' - !''� -��I � �`--% __ ' ,1 � _ -- --����,� \� / . /` r~� . � -. ceo�!Kp�-r��-►� o �•- �NIr°1 1 J j =Si' M =LI^7`'3 � c�" p,C J r 7 xy �sM� cow_ T J 11 I Imo• i f •!T�= p��K�__ _ -- /°��► ✓ M- .,► -- ....,. 3 TliE�'I� UVI�,N4 1- y I _ 5G.G r t M , - ro y NCky U lb rmba'L t ANd L^Mp I• �E ALe L°�N �� ;O �4R1N rgVl/�Y E ® LUf 07-C7oa•I3 I� �.UR•. F'�F1 µ(ra�lK:�, ?re. .�� 0. V A "(�- iRiTb -^ FepF1 LAWN V 'at k I x�{• !eE►..�W� h . R.D. L Q 9. LAWN 5FHA !L ©;.DhS �.�i!-Uc:T• o��•!e ��-:,}�� W/i�N N IY°��. '� I� x a � L !G;�"I?' I NSD No'.Is MAC�oR �_L ��I� � I. ALL WOK Y Mf17`�I^!� .- L_ IO'N To 1 A_d, TKO" .�!�i11PaiG GY. , -Z I NG3 ,p,! _ ,; y'Q• ' ITV"G W/ ; caALVAN Z� ;�I��+Q ? cS Q s.- . CITE . ~ FORM Lnii g � Z GON T Ut-110"3?,ALL Z-Z-f ! J A.ME MF, of Toi13 b'JI 1,10VAL. _ G r i 1 ` 'S•." A a• CONC, sTF771N6 s'T•oN .. M�cF" �NYh` Ut1i - ~ s N L�NC�'A ' 11L •TRl1NKl �- �l1R`( I►�"ll� I�l1Qit�isl �-" r XYL ►A CoN� UM �• f��'tF.r,�S f��lM I�JMNwcIANdM _ E f road IGG ° Tuzz } I`I.°�i IVE- G�'- i L Off�M7U>s BAN I-R- FINr s OV=e I • I �a�>_I�N lilac' llit� �' _- / �� N=;M ' � { zd, G j 1�Ci• �;RI^la 1 IIC:-I ,t. 4 3 CALL IAN 0RA RU!Lr�Tc`�A I odeE•'�II rl ujLAW N loc — N lel I` OL E-AN DE•RLi • CC � I S�c.r+ Gti I GN !`�a'a'U!N�U� { 741 _ N �{- o!T•RUS Imo. IAWNa/'�,�^. c•K a Rum ��1I K a Nav_c.nv�.- - i I M IRI plot I } Il 7 I 'Y—'ti;'. `- I '1+•-ITS I — I �; __ - 4;1 5 � s a c,AI.L IAN�ra I 1 - e _D� s ... •- /--f---- Cam, I I-•(�-�-- I i --A _ / r r l 1 M �►(, L --I — _ Z 1 l.ANG'E}°� JAG''gRf'�N� 6 •c:, 7 XY!©SMA coli�EE �U F1 5 N=�e►U�( -LAN 6. i�771TF- f I K-� — /°� -- •' ..... �` 3 Thies 71^ �eU VlA" "N 1 NO `0 rr T < �� U MtAN J L^M7 ♦ L U I`^ 07•a'-•1Lu 3 Leo ?• �`!���`�T= <31-1 RIl5 rb�Ce ff R ri !,'°JINN Alegi= �W LUMa�1 01' IJ �. 13 �L�C Ix fWJ hpR•, ? , 3. LAO OljgLL ram- 'llTMJDA� 0' 1 h S •�. ;i L-Uc%T, 0��� 5 'J= W/f�N N Q`, (� r10 L 1(2�11T I NG NO GUN I '"CTCR ALL �NI Ile �T' N I. ALL Wc�K � T`�����; _-�-- ,A+_ �����!e /'�l Y Mf1 I �� M_ _ f ION ID I('I A710N 4 TIM.. SH a c;oN pU IT �� �Gi1=a -40 c'vG W/ LVA( 'Z✓ �'?O !eft='@ . USA M15F-L)-G-� i� .IIMINJM �o�=� QAL. T _ W � 3 W. eel r 1 - I Q IN t �NY� ll J -III a NUS LIA\Nc�� NUL •TRUNKS a �`( f N���s 'viR�olsl 5�c.� arc �.�%• - -- �$ aH IQC?I N� �Ndrl road IkT t►aTcHIN� INDI��'� �e� �a= � / / � L,-_._--__- - -- ____ ,,-� � i -� w/ y�r DF�oM ( LL Ir°�N A (f ?►1 111� / eag^N, FIN FSoVEQ ' 'VIR1016 S{` INN� 1$4 c� i LA _ I 3 G4LL IAN DRA I NACU!Lr1Tc� " i EGG :; • ; . . . � I�; 8 N ENI U M CA-EAN DER s t 1 ,�/ w , , , cc LLJ i 7 � • i v • i r zr —- - _- --- N U) I A4 4 0l;Ruh L j I LA\wry N ------- 1 50 C! 3• Rum' " OQ 77 If I G I �C�PE�� �NUJ Imo-G°� ( 7 , • . ' t it Ps�RM � 5�,c. _ ' �. _'-`*, " \ - � � - ;� ._.____ 5 ���IscJs �• siN -Nsls ----- - �... '♦ c, i ', ,/ '� �� ` - - -- �` - `_ ,\ ,• Now . �!..� '�aU�p�-�� � � �N� -_ -1 _� f 4 , �! i cSO -L^ 7 x !©SMa C%oN� , 5 N_MI J N CL�=-►gN Y - .e. , ; !�";-- - IKIKi 5Yr'�L MANU - L"NM7 (. •,AL; 1�N 'o IN AA/, ♦ LUMP o7•aoa.I3 I� �,J�. FRoN9 D ►N�°�LK�>, "C. s 3. LAO OH- ALL e;r--- MYn)Q I ZI PSt6TM J D*� �U;.DN S ��I�-GYT. G�Y�R �;;:``JED W//�N N Y`�; "�Z•,� � � c rx;T. L K '1 j" 1 N� N O' ' i�N� GIN C.,70� I, ALL WOK .. I°LAn 4 51 L- �,,`! oY,'ti=�!S �!'�•"�c L 1 r` I ! '`�- M =`! FEZ Mh� �o� 70 TIM - .SH N d^L 0s jT-`� ^ti[ - �I pp i 9 LU _ J -7 -77Z-Z-/Z--�-----7--/- -�-k W R. Iry r F ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Lc) J p cv rx o cb r' t 1 - r _ I` 1 1 Y is F Alk io ui lv� 71 Or, VJ t i Via,d, r i , r , t , 1 „ , Y , r _ co E A T E L E V ATl co t ro V co n, 1• i. �1 pq 1 J h, 'N r N .E J,. 1 . , O CD LT --------------- TION �In SOUTH f F 14 rr • i f t i - p ! 4 ru' 4, 1 r . � w i 4q a F'� q4\ rye , 1 i i >< i 77 P,i 1 ( r t { , , , WEST ELEVATIr-) N t f a W . i e 'I J , , _r N r 1' X r4 A - ,. -_.ciwwnnin e+u +weww . ..::. 'we�Y�{ .._ a....�, ut rv.: LL-�w#' .',�•.ir. , L0 a 0 : w (� i } W r Q N ' T V o z 154. O S` ..� : 0 lJL r ' . a co 0 co Alt 75 — Q v, co `µx I i 7 RAS FA AREPc BATH t ��.�k A N(� — C O M �'r�'� ` CV 8 Al ea to _ LUw; 1 KITCI� N , LAUNDRY 1 t uj t �r010 . 4D I , . , Lo PARK i 9 x 20 12 �c is00 --i AP-' 5 DOWNSTAIRS . 1 (n _ f j r r "'� i { 24 x 2 P i _ -------- X co I XP f3ALCOP�1y-UP f3' can�Y — _ ------- A PT S I AND 2 24 x 3$ /%P S 3 AND 4 SQ FT 212 SO F-T , PATI0- DW APT S JPS'TAIRS CM -- jN �� u1 sir r BALCONY � �` BALCONY _ i cM a - ! j PATI O pAT 1 O w. n 11 t I n t F : kj ram_. x`a 4 , r _ i 1 � a•---.. r r I POOL MCC n I s 10 18. ,f. , ,pp ' A r , I 1 s _ - j 2' } TDRIVEWAY � 24' 5F e S DEDICATION LINE ,: r V a . ♦ DRIG, PREP• —LINE k SAN PASC UAL - i di r r x r R. b p , r r f fiI'