Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPP 86-29 COMMERCIAL BUILDING/SAN CARLOS AVENUE 1986 PRECISE PLAN � TENTATIVE TRACT ZONE CHANGE PARCEL MAP VARIANCE C.U.E . REFER 'TO: '507- c- , " v 94-11 APPLICANT: �R,441l ' LOCATION : f 1,/ Com^lErz -5An! C'ARLpI 'o-s1[trs'r 0y?);PC REQUEST: ?000 S� - FT, ewAlGar11p'- z'cac-. EXISTING ZONE: _ PREPARATION PROGRESS DATE` BY COMMENTS APPLICATION RECEIVED 5•7�914!6 PJ LEGAL PUBLICATION SENT NOTICES SENT FIELD INVESTIGATION DEPTS. NOTIFIED BUILDING $b PJ ENGINEERING FIRE ' POLICE RECF,'EATION & PARKS SCHOOL. DISTRICT DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS FLOOD CONTROL PRELIMINARY MEETING STAFF REPORT FINAL PLAN APPROVAL PRECISE PLAN (6) LANDSCAPING PLAN (5) PLAN. DIRECTOR MOD. (6) HEARINGS & ACTIONS DATE ACTION VOTE REVIEW BOARD HEARING P.C. HEARING PUBLISHED P.C. PUBLIC HEARING APPLICANT NOTIFIED C.C. PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE NO. RESOLUTION NO. EFFECTIVE DATE RECORDED FOR DATA- BANK ZONING MAP CORRECTED SO PROOF OF PLI*ATION This space Islort 3unty Clerk's Filing Stamp (2015.5 C.C. R1.:'EIVE9 '86 JUN 25 AEI 1113 STATE OF. CALIFORNIA, 6ITY CLERKS OFFICE County of Riverside I am a citizen of the United Stales and a CITY OF PALM DESERT resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to Proof of Publication of or interested in the above-entitled mattec. I am the principal clerk of the printer of the R8S1i.NR...RP..a6.:29............................ DESERT POST .......................... CITY OF PALM DEBEer ............................................... LEM NOME a newspaper of general circulation, printed CASE N0.PP each NOTICE IS HEREBY ONEN that a ptdlo hftft+.'lit be held before the Palm - B i-we Damn r p alpc mill on ofconsoor a rooseat by FRANK GOODMAN few and published ••. 1 .wee...................... wrm o of a 7,000 amrere tam wmmrcal mructure located Ina 6l MOMS at the enumsml corner of San Carlo IS -15 . so deacrbed": in the City of ...Palu�.Deser•t•••••••• Chamber ••••• SAID publichead"I be held Tuesdar.ady I.IBIS.m 7:00 p.m.In this Council at it,Patin Dmmt CIHc Center,7'"10 Fred Warhq D,Ne.Palm Deem, County of Riverside, and which news. Cementer.at which tlme and pace all Interested personal are Imbed to anent and be heard.If you ch&IW a the proposed actions in cam,ymmaybelimbedtoMe- paper has been adjudged a newspaper �a�sei � dattthe�denn�lc rf�mmlm lw d—ribed In of general circulation by the Superior city won elf et for prior to,The Wmia hearing. State of RAMON0.ing COToretary Court of the County of Riverside, palm Demrl Nerminp Cammleebn ' (pub D.P.,lum 20.IBM California,under the date of.10/5 ., 19 64 , Case Number .83658..••••;that the notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpareil), has _ been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-Wit: ......... 6 X 2 I?.................................... all in the year 19.86.. I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated at...P.g�LR.R9@�? F................... California,this...�Axh•dayof.June., 198642 .. .. ..St nature PIN copies of this blank form maY be"cored barn+ CALIFORNIA REASP PER SERVICE C. Legal Advertising Clearing House 120 west second sos Angeles. •Caliif. 90012 Telephone: ( t Please rN IawMMM 14011OfHN d ►rb11u11M. i off IF8:0 � IM®=(:&u0t7V 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NOTICE OF ACTION Date: July 2, 1986 FRANK GOODMAN 77-900 Avenue of the States Palm Desert, CA 92260 Re: PP 68 2 AND PMW 86-11 The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of July 1 , 1986. APPROVED BY ADOPTION OF PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1159 AS AMENDED. CARRIED 5-0. Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Community Development, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen ( 15) days of the date of the decision. f"'Vzewl '" RAMON A. DIAZ, SEC R TA PALM DESERT PLANNING C MISSION RAD/tm PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1159 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PRECISE PLAN OF DESIGN AND PARCEL MAP WAIVER TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A 7, 000 SQUARE FOOT COMMERCIAL BUILDING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ALESSANDRO AND SAN CARLOS. CASE NOS. PP 86-29, PMW 86-11 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 1st day of July, 1986, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider the request of FRANK GOODMAN for above mentioned request; and WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedure for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 80-89," in that the director of community development has determined that the project will not have a significant adverse impact on the environmental and a negative declaration is hereby certified; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said planning commission did find the following facts and reasons to exist to justify granting approval of said precise plan and parcel map waiver: 1 . The design of the precise plan will not substantially depreciate property values in the vicinity. 2. The precise plan will not unreasonably interfere with the use or enjoyment of property in the vicinity by the occupants thereof for lawful purposes. 3. The precise plan will not endanger the public peace, health, safety or general welfare. 4. The planning commission shall grant a waiver, provided that it finds that the proposed consolidation and the resulting parcels comply with applicable requirements as to area, improvements and design, floodwater drainage control , appropriate improved public roads, sanitary disposal facilities, water supply availability environmental - protection and other requirements of this title. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1 . That the above . recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the commission in this case; 2. That approval of Precise Plan 86-29 and Parcel Map Waiver 86-II are hereby granted for reasons subject to the attached conditions. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1159 PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 1st day of July, 1986, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: DOWNS, ERWOOD, RICHARDS, WOOD, AND CRITES NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE Rn CRITES, Chairman ATTEST• RAMON A. DIAZ, Secret v I /tm i i I 2 I I I PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1159 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NOS. PP 86-29, PMW 86-11 Department of Community Development: 1. The development of the property shall conform substantially with exhibits on file with the department of community development/planning, as modified by the following conditions. 2. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein which are in addition to all municipal ordinances and state and federal statutes now in force, or which hereafter may be in force. 3. Construction of a portion of said project shall continence within one year from the date of final approval unless an extension of time Is granted; otherwise said approval shall become null , void and of no effect whatsoever. 4. Prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contemplated by this approval , the applicant shall first obtain permits and/or clearance from the following agencies: Palm Desert Architectural Commission Coachella Valley Water District Public Works Department City Fire Marshal Palm Desert Water & Services District Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to the department of building and safety at the time of issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. 5. Applicant shall install a landscaping strip between the parking area and property line, as well as provide large canopy shade trees in the parking lot area. Department of Public Works: 1. Drainage and stgnalization fund fees, as required by city ordinance, shall be paid prior to grading permit Issuance. 2. Storm drain construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study by the private engineer that is approved by the department of public works. 3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1159 3. Full public Improvements, including traffic safety lighting, as required by ordinance and the director of public works, shall be installed in accordance with city standards. 4. Complete Improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the city engineer for checking and approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. The engineer shall submit "as-built" plans prior to the acceptance of the improvements by the city. 5. All private driveways and parking lots shall be inspected by the engineering department and a standard inspection fee shall be paid prior to grading permit issuance. 6. Landscaping maintenance on San Carlos Avenue, Alessandro Drive, and the alley shall be provided by the property owner. 7. Existing utilities in the alley and on the western property line shall be undergrounded per each respective utility district's recommendation. 8. Complete grading plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the city engineer for checking and approval prior to issuance of any permits. 9. , Installation of sidewalk on Alessandro Drive and San Carlos Avenue. 10. Offsite improvement plans to be approved by public works department and a surety posted to guarantee the required offsite improvements prior to grading permit issuance. il . Size, number and location of driveways to public works specifications with only one ( 1) driveway approach to be allowed to serve this property. j12. Any permit issuance shall be subject to the waiver of parcel map first being approved and recorded. 13. Applicant shall complete right-of-way vacation of the southwest corner of San Carlos and Alessandro prior to the issuance of- any permits associated with this project. City Fire Marshal : 1. Install a water system capable of delivering 3000 GPM fire flow from any fire hydrant for a . three hour duration in addition to domestic supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow Is measured at the time of measurement. Fire flow requirements will depend on built-in fire protection provisions of buildings. i 4 i I PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1159 2. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants so that no point of any building is more than 200 feet from a fire hydrant measured along approved vehicular travel ways. a. exterior surfaces of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow, and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. b. curbs shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. C. hydrants shall not be located closer than 25 feet to any building. 3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and two copies of the water system plan to the fire marshal for review. Upon approval , one copy will be sent to the building department, and the original will be returned to the developer. 4. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and approved by the water company, with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system in Case No. PP 86-29 is In accordance with the requirements prescribed by the fire marshal ." 5. Prior to delivery of combustible materials to the building site, the required water system shall be installed, operating, and delivering the required flow. 6. Additional fire protection requirements may be necessary when the applicant submits specific plans for consideration and approval . 7. All buildings over 5000 square feet require an approved fire sprinkler system. 5 aw MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION JULY 1, 1986 Moved by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner Wood, adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 1158, approving PP 86-28 and TT 21718, subject to conditions as amended. Carried 5-0. E. Case Nos 268PP 9 and PMW 86-11 - FRANK GOODMAN, Applicant Request for approval of a 7,000 square foot commercial building at the southwest corner of Alessandro and San Carlos. Mr. Diaz outlined the salient points of the staff report and explained that on condition #9 under public works conditions the words "four feet" should be deleted. I Commissioner Downs did not agree that there could be excessive parking that should be replaced with landscaping. Mr. Diaz explained that he did not believe that necessary parking was being deleted. Chairman Crites opened the public testimony and asked the applicant to address the commission. MR. RICHARD OLIPHANT, 77-900 Avenue of the States, explained that he was representing Mr. Goodman and he felt that the project would be attractive and agreed to the conditions of approval . Commissioner Wood asked for clarification regarding the parking and landscaping. Mr. Oliphant explained that they had extra parking spaces that the ordinance did not require. Chairman Crites stated that he would like to see a large green strip of landscaping provided between the parking area and property line, as well as large canopy shade trees in the parking area. Mr. Oliphant agreed to those items being added as conditions of approval . I Chairman Crites asked if anyone present wished to speak in FAVOR or OPPOSITION to the proposed. There being no one, the public testimony was closed. Action: Moved by Commissioner Downs,. seconded by Commissioner Erwood, adopting the findings as presented by staff. Carried 5-0. 10 -•s MINUTES 14 PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION JULY 1, 1986 Moved by Commissioner Downs, seconded by Commissioner Erwood, adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 1159, approving PP 86-29 and PMW 86-11 , subject to conditions as amended. Carried 5-0. G. Case No. ZOA 86-4 - CITY OF PALM DESERT, Applicant Request for approval of an amendment requiring a conditional use permit for convenience stores and liquor selling establishments in all zones. Mr. Diaz explained that the ordinance had been revised as commission requested and noted that the condition regarding hours of operation had been deleted. Staff recommended approval . Commissioner Wood noted that he was in favor of anything that would tighten up convenience store operation. Commissioner Erwood asked if this ordinance would apply to existing businesses. Mr. Diaz replied no, only businesses coming in after the ordinance was adopted. Commissioner Downs asked that if a business changed ownership it would then be subject to this ordinance. Mr. Diaz replied no. Mr. Diaz explained that if a nuisance was determined, It would come under a different code section. i Chairman Crites asked if anyone present wished to speak in FAVOR or OPPOSITION to the proposed. There being no one, the public testimony was closed. j Action: Moved by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner Downs, adopting the findings as presented by staff. Carried 5-0. Moved by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner Downs, adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 1160, recommending approval of ZOA 86-4 to city council . Carried 5-0. H. Case No. ZOA 86-5 - CITY OF PALM DESERT, Applicant Request for approval of an amendment adding section 25 .86. 015 and amending sections 25.30.220, 25.30.230, and 25.30.240 to identify developments which would require city council 11 i PROOF OF PUB ATION Thisspacelsfort` lounty Clerk's Filing Stamp (201S.5 C.C.P. i EIV[8 '86 JUN 25 AM 1113 STATE OF. CALIFORNIA, tdITY GL RKS 01=l 10E County of Riverside 1 am a citizen of the United States and a CITY OF PALM DESERT resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to Proof of Publication of or interested in the above entitled matter. I R8S>+.NR...RP..R5.:z9 am the principal clerk of the printer of the ............................ .....DESERT.POST............................ CITY OF PALM DESERT ..............................................:..... LEGAL NOTICE a general of newspaper al circulation, printed CASE NO.PIP 8&29 9 NOTICE IS HEREBY OIYEN that a public hearing wgl sa held bet"a*Palm B i—week 1 y Darter panning Comme°m"io consider a request by Fawn GOODMAN he eo and published .................................. bP`�uthweesttco at a 7'memoffSSanCe�rlos and commercial r`oN�dezrmeaastm»etme APN'S 627-152-004;5 N SAID public hearing wil be held Tueadry.July 1,1955,at 7:00 P.M.in the Cancs in the City Of ...Pala.D BSA r.t............. Chamber at the helm Deem CWk Careful.73510 Fred Werhg Orkin,Palm Deem. County of Riverside, and which news- Californiard5fyoh""' and pace all engeth proposedacttw sm°c'rn,�m"befirnl to ftedtoftend ni� he heeM.II you challenge the paper has been adjudged a newspaper Ing ony fte,issues you or someone aim rallied at the Public hearing described In -this mike,or In whim correepmndemoe dea!erod to the panning coriimi6alm(Or of general circulation by the Superior city council)at m pkr to,the public hearing. RAMON A.DIAZ,Secretary Court of the County of Riverside, State of Palm Desert Planning Commisson (Pub D.P.June 20,1986) California,under the date of.l 0/S., 19 64 , Case Number .8 36 58......; that the notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpareil), has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not In any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: .........6 X�y.................................... all in the year 19.86.. 1 certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated at.... .................. California,this...4Rxb.day of.Juna,-19 S6 . Si nature FIN copies al this slant lots,mad be secured Items - CALIFORNIA N EAUPAPER SERVICE Legal Advertising Clearing House 120 west secona st.. Los Angeles,Calif. 90012 Telephone: (213) 625.2541 IIUNfad when etch RlM this term.lNellcatlN, Southern California Edison Company 74000 HIGHWAY 111 PALM DESERT. CALIFORNIA 92260 KERMIT MARTIN July 14, 1986 AREA MANAGER Phil Joy Palm Desert Planning Department 73510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert , California 92260 Dear Mr. 'Joy : We have reviewed your request for an estimate of the cost of converting the existing overhead distribution lines to an underground system in the block between De Anza Way and San Pablo Avenue . This project would involve about 910 feet of line at an estimated cost of $72 , 800 . The above estimate does not include any charges by General Telephone Company or by Coachella Valley Television Company. Also, costs to convert existing overhead service by individual property owners are not included in our estimate . Please let me know if you should need additional information. Sincerely , //L Kermit Martin KOM;k �fo-a Abu cc: sill Leonesio jUL 1 4 1906 COMMUNITY D V PALMENT 0,,,RTMENT -'� So 50SC38 �3.6' 33.'a60 3�'S lV 1p / 35 55 800 I - � I c 31 -0---- :C .+C-•' 330'0599, I I , • �11 P. '8 ,0 3 •0 iO I '3: 0 5 Q 5 ,0 960 p— © 3- - _ TT �• 33563o m 4 n 38 I7 No u` J 3 o - o :�;�'i��-- •-1 3: o 393a5 45 (. z� •i0i )L 668 `. �. `� - - •V- 0-"'_ - o - / 33 56CIVT PI - - i10. . _ I ----- --- - 9/O 01� ao pen _ z180,n _ I o 35 a 55 PCE �33z 30�--- I CITY OF PALM DESERT DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT TO: PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: JULY 1 , 1986 CASE NOS: PP 86-29, PMW 86-11 REQUEST: Approval of a 7 ,000 square foot commercial building at the southwest corner of Alessandro and San Carlos. APPLICANT: FRANK GOODMAN 77-900 Avenue of the States Palm Desert, CA 92260 I. BACKGROUND: The site is adjacent to the project currently under construction undertaken by the same applicant and across the street from the Wise Athletic Club and a two-story office building recently construction by Frank Urrutia. If . DISCUSSION- The project is intended to be a replica of the structure the applicant has under construction presently to create a complex. The site was previously approved for a two-story structure with more landscaping surrounding the building so that this application has the same general site plan except that the building footprint is larger while the parking number is the same. The architectural commission reviewed the plan at their meeting June 24 and recommended shifting the building slightly to create more landscaping between the street and structure and eliminating some excess parking with landscaping, partially in response to the concerns raised by Frank Urrutia. PROJECT DATA: Requirement Provision Front Setback 5' 5' Side Setbacks & Rear 0' , 5' & 0' 50' , 5' & 25' Max. Building Height 30' 17.5' Parking Spaces 25' 32' STAFF REPORT CONTINUED PP 86-29, PNW 86-11 111. ANALYSIS: A. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL OF A PARCEL MAP WAIVER: 1 . The planning commission shall grant a waiver, provided that it finds that the proposed consolidation and the resulting parcels comply with applicable requirements as to area, improvements and design, floodwater drainage control , appropriate improved public roads, sanitary disposal facilities, water supply availability environmental protection and other requirements of this title. Justification: The consolidation into one parcel for this development will comply with all applicable requirements and will allow one integrated development. B. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL OF PRECISE PLAN: 1 . The design of the precise plan will not substantially depreciate property values in the vicinity. Justification: The design of the use can be attractive and will be compatible with other uses existing in the vicinity. 2. The precise plan wi l l not unreasonably interfere with the use of or enjoyment of property in the vicinity of the occupants thereof for lawful purposes. Justification: The surrounding land in the vicinity is zoned for the same type of use as proposed and owners would not be deprived the use of their land. 3. The precise plan will not endanger the public peace, health, safety or general welfare. Justification: The precise plan complies with all code requirements and will not be detrimental to the public peace, health, safety or general welfare. Staff feels the findings for approval can be justified for this precise plan. 2 STAFF REPORT CONTINUED PP 86-29, PMN 86-11 B. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The director of environmental services has determined that the proposed project will not have an adverse impact on the environment and a negative declaration of environmental impact has been prepared. IV. 'RECOMMENDATION: Staff feels the proposed project is acceptable and recommends: A. Adoption of the findings. B. Adoption of Planning Commission Resolution No. approving PP 86-29 and PMW 86-11 , subject to conditions. V. ATTACHMENTS: A. Draft resolution. B. Legal notice. C. Attachments. Prepared by Reviewed and Approved by PJ/tm 3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PRECISE PLAN OF DESIGN AND PARCEL MAP WAIVER TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A 7, 000 SQUARE FOOT COMMERCIAL BUILDING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ALESSANDRO AND SAN CARLOS. CASE NOS. PP 86-29, PMW 86-I1 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 1st day of July, 1986, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider the request of FRANK GOODMAN for above mentioned request; and WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedure for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 80-89, " in that the director of community development has determined that the project will not have a significant adverse impact on the environmental and a negative declaration is hereby certified; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said planning commission did find the following facts and reasons to exist to justify granting approval of said precise plan and parcel map waiver: 1 . The design of the precise plan will not substantially depreciate property values in the vicinity. 2. The precise plan will not unreasonably interfere with the use or enjoyment of property in the vicinity by the occupants thereof for lawful purposes. 3. The precise plan will not endanger the public peace, health, safety or general welfare. 4. The planning commission shall grant a waiver, provided that it finds that the proposed consolidation and the resulting parcels comply with applicable requirements as to area, improvements and design, floodwater drainage control , appropriate improved public roads, sanitary disposal facilities, water supply availability environmental protection and other requirements of this title. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1 . That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the commission in this case; 2. That approval of Precise Plan 86-29 and Parcel Map Waiver 86-11 are hereby granted for reasons subject to the attached conditions. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 1st day of Jam, 1986, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: BUFORD CRITES, Chairman ATTEST: RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary /tm 2 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE MOS. PP 86-29, PMW 86-11 Department of Community Development: I . The development of the property shall conform substantially with exhibits on file with the department of community development/planning, as modified by the following conditions. 2. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein which are in addition to all municipal ordinances and state and federal statutes now in force, or which hereafter may be in force. 3. Construction of a portion of said project shall commence within one year from the date of final approval unless an extension of time is granted; otherwise said approval shall become null , void and of no effect whatsoever. 4. Prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contemplated by this approval , the applicant shall first obtain permits and/or clearance from the following agencies: Palm Desert Architectural Commission Coachella Valley Water District Public Works Department City Fire Marshal Palm Desert Water S Services District Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to the department of building and safety at the time of issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. Department of Public Works: 1 . Drainage and signalization fund fees, as required by city ordinance, shall be paid prior to grading permit issuance. 2. Storm drain construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study by the private engineer that is approved by the department of public works. 3. Full public improvements, including traffic safety lighting, as required by ordinance and the director of public works, shall be installed in accordance with city standards. 3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 4. Complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the city engineer for checking and approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. The engineer shall submit "as-built" plans prior to the acceptance of the improvements by the city. 5. All private driveways and parking lots shall be inspected by the engineering department and a standard inspection fee shall be paid prior to grading permit issuance. 6. Landscaping maintenance on San Carlos Avenue, Alessandro Drive, and the alley shall be provided by the property owner. 7. Existing utilities in the alley and on the western property line shall be undergrounded per each respective utility district's recommendation. 8. Complete grading plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the city engineer for checking and approval prior to issuance of any permits. 9. Installation of four foot sidewalk on Alessandro Drive and San Carlos Avenue. 10. Offsite improvement plans to be approved by public works department and a surety posted to guarantee the required offsite improvements prior to grading permit issuance. II . . Size, number and location of driveways to public works specifications with only one ( 1 ) driveway approach to be allowed to serve this property. 12. Any permit issuance shall be subject to the waiver of parcel map first being approved and recorded. 13. Applicant shall complete right-of-way vacation of the southwest corner of San Carlos and Alessandro prior to the issuance of any permits associated with this project. City Fire Marshal : 1 . Install a water system capable of delivering 3000 GPM fire flow from any fire hydrant for a three hour duration in addition to domestic supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement. Fire flow requirements will depend on built-in fire protection provisions of buildings. 4 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants so that no point of any building is more than 200 feet from a fire hydrant measured along approved vehicular travel ways. a. exterior surfaces of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow, and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. b. curbs shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. C. hydrants shall not be located closer than 25 feet to any building. 3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and two copies of the water system plan to the fire marshal for review. Upon approval , one copy will be sent to the building department, and the original will be returned to the developer. 4. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and approved by the water company, with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system in Case No. PP 86-29 is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the fire marshal ." 5. Prior to delivery of combustible materials to the building site, the required water system shall be installed, operating, and delivering the required flow. 6. Additional fire protection requirements may be necessary when the applicant submits specific plans for consideration and approval . 7. All buildings over 5000 square feet require an approved fire sprinkler system. 5 ^sM t 5�_ " 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 June 12, 191-16 CITY DF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE CASE NO. PP 86-29 N01 IIE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held before the Palm lesert Planning Commission to consider a request by FRANK GOODMAN for approval of a 7,1100 square foot commercial structure located in a C-1 zone at the southwest corner of San Carlos and Alessandro, also described as: A.P.N.'S 627-152-004, 5. 6 6 ,,A, „ ante Jena IB�QQQ�o' 14,QQ Y 2 (511 R2 (5) R2(5)� ry W R'3' " A o R1. Rrl . � ! y R=1 R= w4, — --- 14000 ' __ R_3 R'I w,po R I C-I C-I r..._... z r R3 (4) L LN1 { z1 777777 C'I;Ii..R i GI C 1C-I,IIS.,. . E PROJECT LOCATION W' Q a b M A V 11 ' il � C-I S.P. C-I S P L... . ..i .iC-I� 1 � vaq 'L� ' 1111 � A S—E C� _� _ E 0 C -7- 1 11 C-I L7f I C—I . SAID puhl is hearing will be held on Tuesday, July I, 1986, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber at the Palm Desert Civic Center, 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all interested persons are Invited to attend and be heard. If you challenge the proposed actions In court, you Inay be limited to raising only those Issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the planning commission (or city council) at, or prior to, the Public hearing. PUBLISH: Palm Desert Post RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary . . Jung 20, 1986 Palm Desert Planning Commission CITY OF PALM DESERT INTEROFFICE MEMO TO: Phil Joy FROM: Brent Conley RE: PP86-29-86-11 Date: June 4, 1986 Per plot plan proposed, recommendation to move trees or shrubbery from window, allowing view of exterior by employees. Addressing of the business should be of contrasting colors and at least 6 ' in height . The exterior doors should be equipped with the dead bolt locks and the latch guards to prevent forced entry. Emphasis to exterior lighting should be addressed to allow adequate lighting for both employees and tenants safety. This standard should conform to Palm Desert Planning standards. Questions or comments, please contact me at ext. 303 . Brent Conley Crime Prevention Officers BC/rrt PR1C.(L 2E:R L.AN PALy C�c ;, ;, LFCRfiIA 92'�0 r.V 5 iT�==?!iCNB (714) Z46 II • LOfd,N;;�,llI OL':FLOP!,�P,T D[rYlt(�V1'_'Idi CITY OF PpL,,, OE Ri "i t) 7, . =uw r .t -- C2:=TIC C.;N ?,�A-- , 1 rm iErd_7... ARr--�-^r��—,7e'�I.. L�F,Iv� ?,ITD =-M= IS l:. 1%iVYY1�'.lAi7 LAM CC1lr.-�L1��U . 246 Q•=7�.. �v�D�T�i� ?�5 l pC�l C— CAJ TAU &4 O�I3=0TOR OF BUILD INC 6 ARCHITECTURE• PLANNING •INTERIORS June 24, 1985 Palm Desert Design Review Board and Palm Desert Planning Commission City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Dr . Palm Desert , CA 92260 Re: Case No . PP 86-29 Gentlemen : I am the owner of the new office building immediately north of the above subject proposed project and after reviewing the drawings of this project have three areas of main concern . 1 . The proposed building will contain roof top air conditioning units which could be visible from our second floor offices . Since our building was established prior to the proposed project , the developer should be concerned about what his neighbors are going to see . To my north is a group of apartments which contain roof top units and are very visible , however , they were built many years ago and fall under a pre -existing condition . I feel , however , that all new development should be respectful of this type of situation and include proper design to mitigate this concern . 2. The proposed building was specified to contain a "snow-coat" roof coating which is white . My concern is that there is a great deal of reflection with "white" and we do not want problems with glare , looking down from the second floor . 3 . The proposed building is located immediately against the sidewalk with very little landscaping . In contrast , our building is set back 15 ' from the property line allowing for better landscaping and softening of the building. Although the proposed property is zoned C-1 , I feel the transition to R-3 (which is our present zoning ) should be a compromise between zero setback and our 151 . A larger setback will allow for better landscaping to soften the massiveness of their building . I also feel their landscaping plan is very minimal in quantity and sizes , and additional trees could be utilized for shading in their parking area . Two years ago I approached the city with the idea of building on our site and I was encouraged by City officials to do so . I feel strongly now as I did then , that this " side " of the highway deserves better . I felt strong enough about that to invest our time and monies in establishing what we hoped would become . an 73-550 ALESSANDRO DRIVE • SUITE I • PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 • 619-341-2555 June 24 , 1986 Palm Desert Design Review Board and Palm Desert Planning Commission Re : Case No . PP 86-29 Page Two example of how new development could upgrade the north side . With the addition of our building and the Wise ' s Athletic Club , we feel this is a beginning of what could be a good development pattern . I strongly urge the City Design Review Board and the City Planning Commission to look at this as an opportunity to require good development , with good design and good landscaping . The lack of creativity is no excuse to allowing a compromised development . This city deserves better . Sincerely , LRRUTIA ARCHITECTS Fra ci g J . Urrutia , A. I .A. /s vrrutin MMMOUN% ARCHITECTURE•PLANNING•INTERIORS June 24 , 1985 Palm Desert Design Review Board and Palm Desert Planning Commission City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Dr . Palm Desert , CA 92260 Re: Case No . PP 86-29 Gentlemen : I am the owner of the new office building immediately north of the above subject proposed project and after reviewing the drawings of this project have three areas of main concern . 1 . The proposed building will contain roof top air conditioning units which could be visible from our second floor offices . Since our building was established prior to the proposed project , the developer should be concerned about what his neighbors are going to see . To my north is a group of apartments which contain roof top units and are very visible , however , they were built many years ago and fall under a pre -existing condition . I feel , however , that all new development should be respectful of this type of situation and include proper design to mitigate this concern . 2. The proposed building was specified to contain a "snow-coat" roof coating which is white . My concern is that there is a great deal of reflection with "white " and we do not want problems with glare , looking down from the second floor . 3 . The proposed building is located immediately against the sidewalk with very little landscaping . In contrast , our building is set back 15 ' from the property line allowing for better landscaping and softening of the building . Although the proposed property is zoned C-1 , I feel the transition to R-3 (which is our present zoning ) should be a compromise between zero setback and our 15 ' . A larger setback will allow for better landscaping to soften the massiveness of their building . I also feel their landscaping plan is very minimal in quantity and sizes , and additional trees could be utilized for shading in their parking area . Two years ago I approached the city with the idea of building on our site and I was encouraged by City officials to do so . I feel strongly now as I did then , that this " side " of the highway deserves better . I felt strong enough about that to invest our time and monies in establishing what we hoped would become an 73-550 ALESSANDRO DRIVE • SUITE 1 • PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 • 619-341-25SS June 24 , 1986 Palm Desert Design Review Board and Palm Desert Planning Commission Re : Case No . PP 86-29 Page Two example of how new development could upgrade the north side . With the addition of our building and the Wise ' s Athletic Club , we feel this is a beginning of what could be a good development pattern . I strongly urge the City Design Review Board and the City Planning Commission to look at this as an opportunity to require good development , with good design and good landscaping . The lack of creativity is no excuse to allowing a compromised development . This city deserves better . Sincerely , URRUTIA ARCHITECTS Fra ci c J . Urrutia , A. I .A. /s CITY OF PALM DESERT INTEROFFICE MEMO TO: Phil Joy FROM: Brent Conley RE: PP86-29-86-11 Date: June 4, 1986 Per plot plan proposed, recommendation to move trees or shrubbery from window, allowing view of exterior by employees. Addressing of the business should be of contrasting colors and at least 6 ' in height . The exterior doors should be equipped with the dead bolt locks and the latch guards to prevent forced entry. Emphasis to exterior lighting should be addressed to allow adequate lighting for both employees and tenants safety. This standard should conform to Palm Desert Planning standards. Questions or comments, please contact me at ext. 303. Brent Conley Crime Prevention Officers BC/rrt cc 4b.-273 PRICXL" PAR LANE, PALM DESK, C.1UFCRN1A 9Z50 111t�1 ? 5 jgT.Z?HONE (714) 346-0611 COMMUNih DEPELUPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF PALM DESERT S S DZ-r A MAN =tit ate: �►.�- . 7m yw n.� mWms Win:. ANY ram. =AA *Ts c N . YAM, rr�r.* z is V.A.C. _:.'"�?C�I. ni'1M _..:.,;1k C._*�*... . 24 Q Q3`r--Z. MADriL- ?*��LS II c /6V& DIRECTOR OF BUIUINC 6 SA___?y �'` INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES FROH: DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS SUBJECT: I pEECrs FI�AfJ �G-2-� FMW g6�1j DATE : --IUNt� The following should be considered conditions of approval : �I Drainage and signalization fund fees , as required by City ordinance , shall be paid prior to ^permit issuance) . 2) Drainage fact/ ties shall be provided , per Ordinance No. 216 and the Master Drainage Plan, to the specifications of the Director of Public Works . (D Storm drain construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study by the private engineer that is approved by the Department of Public Works . �4 Full public Improvements , including traffic safety lighting, as required by ordinance and the Director of Public Works , shall be Installed in accordance with City standards. 5) Improvement plans for water and sewer systems shall be approved by the respective service districts with "as-built" plans submitted to the Department of Public Works prior to the protect final . OComplete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required by ordinance , to the City Engineer for checking and approval before construction of any Improvements is commenced. The engineer shall submit "as-built" plans prior to the acceptance of the Improvements by the City. drltrP�t.at3t��; av+d SJ'c;�-�nnnqq �o't5 U All private shall be lnspect�d by the engineering department and a standard Inspection fee shall be paid prior to (_eeeaedallon permit is- suance) . t� frxlin Cam, k�s A �7! " o y V .. a» �y Landscaping maintenance o <a.,,. r r,.a^^� s all be 8 e provided by the ) (property owner) In ��� W25LP.rn Frr O9 Existing utilities � 'Jn2R.'IP . sh 'I be underg ou d- ed per each respective utility district' s recommendation.: 10 ) Traffic safety striping on shall be provided. to the specifications of the Director of Public Works . A traffic control plan must be submitted to and approved by , the Director of Public Works before placing pavement markings . ll Complete grading plans and specifications shall be submit ted, as required by ordinance , to the City Engineer for checking and approval prior to issuance of any permits . 12 ) Dedication of feet of right-of-way on shall be done prior to Issuance of any permits and approval of plans . j 13 Instal Iation of ,_ v-t 'tom `�#ji�g pavLn -and sidewalk on A N!,s<aa,� flr- a rr4 tea, , Cd-�zss A-V 14 ) Walvetr of access to except at approved locations shall be granted on the final map. I I . 15) Close unused driveway with full heighth curb and gutter .' : ! lr © offsite improvement, plans to be approved by Public Works ', ; ` ; Department and a surety posted to guarantee the required.; .` o f f s I t e Improvements prior to ' �Cr-pia 'I . ^( � permit issuance) . gqr�in 17 ) Full Improvement of interior streets based on ( 60' residen- tial ) (private ) ( industrial ) street standards as established In accordance with Chapter 26, Section 26 . 40 . 040 , C.P.D. . Code . 18) Installation of one-half landscaped median in or cash payment for one-half the cost of landscaped medians .♦ at the option of the Director of Public Works . 19 ) Traffic analysis to be prepared for the project to address the specific impacts on existing networks (street and intersections ) and the proposed mitigation measures recom- mended for approval by the City. 20 ) installation of sewers to serve this project. O/)Le_ 0Size , number and location pf�d rivewayss to Public Works specifications with only_. driveway approach (es ) .to . be allowed to serve this property, 22) No (new) requirements . (Original conditions apply) ,i 23 Any permit issuance shall be subject to the waiver of parcel map first being approved and recorded. 24) Complete (parcel ) (tract) map ( s ) shall be submitted as required by ordinance to the City Engineer for checking and approval and be recorded before ' issuance of certificate of occupancy by the Building Department. j r i'L ,GAT 5/14 t L Corn Dt/'?" ��1 rfT -ems wfl Y O% SA../ (' r�5 � LPL= � Pn pD lop. To -:rr_/SSvn-Jct ' - OF A—'( ?7/'-,2.-.�/rrS /9'-SSocrl�--rk.a wiTit- TN/•S /2c2r_ci lkers ��� Richard J . Fo , P. E . RA/RJF ' I t t: F } RIVERSIDECOUN" � np`f Of CAL/°yy, FIRE DEPARTMEN L IN COOPERATION WITH THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY o� i RAY HEBRARD 114 I 4'�EMi OF FpP FIRE CF� t` I% \. 210 ESTSAN JACINTO AVENUE �4AlF I6' PWERRIS,CALIFORNIA 92370 Raymon Diaz Ni1 6 1QP6 TELEPHONE:(714)657.3183 I, I Planning and Community Development Director tog"uNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPAKINIM 73510 Fred Waring CITY OF PALM DESERT Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 Reference: PP %;- 2.4 Applicant: FRAAIIq GOGdM4At Dear Mr. Ramon Diaz The following fire protection requirements are in accordance with the Uniform Fire Code and Life Safety Code standards. 1 . Install a water system capable of delivering 3000GPM fire flow from any fire hydrant for a 3 hour duration in addition to domestic supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement. - 2. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants so that no point of any building is more than 200 feet from a fire hydrant measured along approved vehicular travel ways . a. exterior surface of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow, and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. b. curbs shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. c. hydrants shall not be located closer than 25 feet to any building. 3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and three copies of the water system plan to the Fire Marshal for review. Upon approval , one copy will be sent to the Building Department and the original will be returned to the developer. 4. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and approved by the water company with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system in P P 8 6—2-4 is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Fire Marshal ." 5. Prior to delivery of combustible materials to the building site, the required water system shall be installed, operating and delivering the required flow. 6. Additional fire protection requirements may be necessary when the applicant submits specific plans for consideration and approval . 7. All buildings over 5000 square feet require an approved fire sprinkler system. Very truly yours, RAY HEBRARD Fire Chief Chieef By , . ® % MIKE MCCONNELL Fire Marshal 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO(S): --_ P S(o_� S(o—II PROJECT: APPLICANT: FRAn/K GDoDrt�1 _____. Enclosed please find materials describing a project for which the following Is being _ requested:- f]�P�od,4L O� -_-- A 7,_ODa SQ F7: l.�.fi�ERC/AL S71):/cTIJR� . L'ocnTE �ti ?.vE s'Lv F�7'__e�oRn/£7t fILESSAN_DRO ALSOaE�c7P[.aED sj S. _� Y1. 677 L52_-Q�S/� Sd. (o The attached data was prepared by the applicant and is being forwarded to you for comments and recommended conditions of approval. The city is interested in the probable impacts on the environment (including land, air, water, minerals, flora, fauna, noise objects of historical or aesthetic significance) and recommended conditions of approval based on your expertise and area of concern. Your comments and recommended conditions of approval must be received by this office prior to 4:30 p.m. 6- /&-66 , in order to be discussed by the land division committee. The land division committee (comprised of director of environmental services, city building official, city engineer, fire marshal and a representative of CVWD) will discuss the comments and recommended conditions of approval and will forward them to the planning commission through the' staff report. Any information received by this office after the receipt deadline will not be discussed by the land division committee. Sincerely, RAMON A. DIAZ DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES _ RD/Ir Attachments a �-e-/ 0/3-002 TR A. 0/8-OM aa- 090 MR. SW NEkq SEC. 20, T55, R.6 E 14 Y � Y 3 O O 4 O "rem • ' t! )rr J : 6 7 1. . 27 4Q ! } ! /53 .57Ak a n p mia-e-w r++c+v.c�f s o •r-o y.--. 3 n ,.,.. s • n ,r e N ' I = IM I �/ N NA j�/..N ♦. I • I r A i Y I f O W�rf � • M N rr r! N I! i STATE ! HWY ADO' - -- - jcwLv _ DE$ERT _ { 1 �//!lI Nw Lv •r OINI.•.O � T �� , ra NM1IINM1ry.y� QMkM. � I i ,� • \ / l osrYct�s a O OIK � •y . A f tL • (�� IJDKM r1 / K I� 2 asS O C M l! •1 \ O .wm99 + /1ofO I/I/Y� 627-151-003 : 627-152.-00T: Bryan Schools Inc . Jack Thompson 2511 Beverly Blvd 735.10 Highway 111 Los Angeles, CA 9005.7 Palm Desert , CA 92260 . 627-152-008:. 627 151-004 : (pl$ Preston Beaver Gosh n Enterpriseo� 939 Coast Blv. #21F 1515 oister Drive La Jolla, CA 92037 Whittie CA 90603 627-152-012: 627-151-005 : Lyndale Manor Frank. Goodman 45474 Garden Square 77900 Ave of States Palm Desert , CA 92260 Palm Desert , CA 9226o . 627-152-013: 627-151-00.6 and 007: Joseph. Buccino Robert Stewart 34 San Sebastian Road 24081 Windward Drive Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 Laguna Niguel, CA 92677 627-15.1-o0.8 and 009: 627-153-0.11 and 0.12 : Frank Urrutia Jack Wise. 45756 Verba . Santa Drive 73-600. Alessandro Palm Desert , CA 92260 Palm Desert , CA 92260 . 627-.152-0o.1i 627-154-602: Paul Kersten Robert Gagnon 81960 Camelot Way 73612 Highway .111 Indio , CA 9220.1 Palm Desert, CA 92260 627-.152-002: 627.-.154-003i. Bernard Wishy Robert Escudero C/Q EUGENE PARKER 246 N. Saturmino Road 2((yy30.0. Gilmore Palm Springs, CA 92262 Canoga Park , CA 91307, 627-152-003 : 627-.154-o'li: M. H . Libott Luciano Frati 44795 San Pablo #1 47-07.7 Marrakesh Drive Palm Desert , CA 9226.0 Palm Desert , CA 92260 627-1 2-00.4 and 00.5.: Daniel Russie 49240. unrose Palm De ert , CA 92260. 627-1 2-006 : �( Q Daniel Russie V Nq 49240 S nros.e \9 Palm Des rt , CA 9226o CER=ICA 1ON OF PTZCP=_RTY OWNERS LIST (T o be filled cut 5y applicant) CITY OF PALM DESERT Department of Environmental Services 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, CA 92250 Subjec.• Gentlemen: I, ��� P -w• / /' do hereby certify, under penalty of perjury, that the attached list sets forth the names and addresses of the following persons as they appear on the last equalized assessment roll of the Riverside County Assessor. Sincerely, ALjI Pri ted Marne A dress Phone Number Dated in the City of California. Signature Ff 73-510 Fred Waring Or., Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 ,�yo PRECISE PLAN Dept.of Planning and Community Development APPiKani ( ptaose Prim) ' s Na b n caress iaieonon� e City C/Slate C:ae REQUEST! (Oexrtbe sPxific nature of approval requested J. J PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. ps EXISTING ZONING G- - � Property Owner Authorization The unaenignad states that may are the owner(s) of the property described herein and hereby izatia for file fill fof this application. P p y ��.Y gipv�e autnar- Agreement aosarvin the C, at (Sicnarura q City Oeserr of all Ilaalllnes reiative to any deed resiriellona. 0are r 1 00 8Y MY SIGNATURE THIS AGREEMENT, Absolve the City of Pat, Desert of all liabilities regarding any deed restrictions that may be applicable tothe property described herein. � Signature �I Applicdnis Signature Date Signature ;2 (FOR STAFF USE CNLY7 Environ on I Status ^ Oates Q Ministerial Act - E.A. No. Accepted by: - ❑ � J"Categorical EsempNan ❑ Negative Oeclaration Cn�C ❑ Other `"`'1R0"rears�seaviczsi+rs a"r-ez Reference Case No. �� Z O � U X W W C ~ W Q o — U —j x + J it m i — O 3 Q a 1 : ffi PUBLIC ALLEY , X�C) s Co 13@0) = I17 23 _ 24 24 t i i i i I I 1 i I c11 1 I I / i ! I I .I t t f I W J p - �; ,jt O ILL Q _ Lu , aZ � PROPOSED BUILDING GENERAL ESCROW -snow4' all24 _ l e p } i I'l35 ray 4 i � ; i i2a7 Bay s py28� 1257 12e,7 bAy .L i c a LL U. I - I aLL > co _ / J / / 0 I Ecn cc N1, Mc��^NAY NAL,i. _ �9 t9 t J LL - - 1 f Y -_ .. _.. .+��.•e.�......._-._-........._.-.,....-.._....__..:,..u........r-....n.v......+-v►«_wwrrw.r'.a�-...•wiw.n+.-��..�..�.�.�•ww+•_.++.vww.�,+r�•n..-...+..r.w.w .+ram. ....-...... .._-. ..___,._........... ......,..-_. -_..- _ _ _.. - _.. .. -._. - - _.. - - - - .. -_ .... .. _...-.__.__..r._-• _�___` _ W ♦R R THIS PROJECT GENERAL ESCROW ----- - - � � � 04 o cc ALESSANDRO DRIVE ` O ch w SITE PLAN 111� 10 NORT H k i i . P�TArL.'c� �0L;n DATE NORTH ELEVATION. � ( ALESSANDRO DRIVE) 1 = 10 PROJECT STATISTICS : SITE Af��A - i°1, 24G� -�5'C4 I�oeO I a, FT, (NET) 250 `L5 GA 95 (ZEq`P 7 (�2 cla-g s PAKKINC, Lt'3T FAA N'f: 6,114 S44, rT. SHEET PARKlN�5 L-0T' p1,ANT'INCa : 1,22P �CK , ;-: (15556 of PAVING, IN ORSURPOLAP[NG PARKING I.OT). APPITIONAI.- PLANTING. 1, 1�5 , FT TOTAL PLANTINc>: 2I3G�0 Sa , FT. i r m z ~ � X U W LLI u► — � = am i i L �l t 11. M`7 �. _ -- ' �v ww♦s 4� '1✓ ' I L, F+I.r �.w:.r r_.wew..✓^'e.—•�___r_ ta+w.srn+a. u.c._...-.vr^ _.__.—. r PAINT MET aRs-. WEST ELEVATION , I _ 011 TCMr'�:N SjUCc'; cc o Z � G�, I 1 '4—�1 ti i It �? - ' �.1 _ � W cn W SOUTH ELEVATION 1/4'' - �' - o" � Q a � a LL u. T/P t~T �A, r-�� > 06 Q ---- O . STU G/-t7 ` co (I-AiiA2'nA"c-4gDST�NC") � -i cc o ' --- - (CLEAR SEALS R Z 5TuCa0 � � Q sru c:o LL Cl) C H Q _' _ - ---- r - f�►�PARK gRuVJN IPA iN'( rx 114 � i T �. cC�+ f�`p° , LL i rtrt r, r l {�..1R,...`'x7 ,'� .,.. ,-� "^>, � 6 n ,� a r �. ��`_ (/j{...� ,. '`t n i" �Q" ., „ `�►('�( ;t` � c.. °+.� ;� J(�� yg.�'i i7 l,�} i 11 �i -� �{'.' }�,,. .i .. (i1.. �_ t\ � !i� ��t f' - a °j�"�,•a ,,, .:' � b l„ � +f^., �.1 W" S �. '. 'w, �• 4-; � k � �., ,. �'� , b v A t.� ;f, i;` f•` i To EAST ELEVATION �/4'' = 1 '- NOTE . c, ' " r ALL T U __,. i.; r=.i. _ :►; i T�x � ,) f , I I . DATE 4v {j (' 9k, ti.:: li t II :�., \� 0 '! IV 4 P 1 5dJ I r i � i V m e o r ^, C �Q d C o ( a 4 c Q oA, q Qq 4 b A . D !1 I a I! 6. 1 d V p 0 --- - - U m •y 6 Q a © C "~V'�t�4S.h}'r`'*l��t � r 4. .. �1 � ��1�� � h°,J' .art •,".t ,. .s�+. +,+�,:� 4- n ��, � s�.+�- _5;.,,�1,.4 n , d'`✓' � n ,-,..3�. r5 r'���.;� 'vr �w,+3"' �.""�1"�'�'+"* L-s � ,�' .1�_..__ rya � �.r��:,. '��r�� r���+"), :S� ��'7 t•�11°�-13��y PUAL GLAZED BKoNME 4L., IN69Aty�' ALUM, WIN VOOF- FFdM5�5 �-(YP,). - o� 4 NItJPCN i oCAT{cN' NORTH ELEVATION INTEKCFiAIJ EA B�.E To suIT TENANT E�E� 11FrFN4ENT5 SHEET " 1 Z O � U X W W W MA 416 CL o J ' 1 1 — o J Q „ ,f X PUBLIC ALLEYv Co' t lh @ 0' 1 2 3 4 4-' = li'7f _ 2 _ -- + ?)4 I i �N 1 • !jlJ � j ,� � I I � I � ( � ! ! 1 L I y , r_ J I " } ' r W 1 � i ! - - Z z ,, J PROPOSED BUILDING - -- _ - - W Z 1 ,- --- . 1 3 GENE AL ESCROW Q -- O Q r I--- _---- - - m ui ui W - i 112 y IS8'1 P�a'�' 1287 SAY 1287 � SAY 1287 BOY ' 8►5 8,AYui E a G ui t O 06 { Q O Q � c J —Al ! f 3 N�. h.���ftRY wa�� _ 1 �3� y, MASONa7 INA 11L. , C) I 1 ! 1 Z co I I W1 w i THIS PROJECT i GENERAL ESCROW __ _ wsO cl Q z i M ALESSANDRO DRIVE O w U l SITE PLAN ,1111= 101 NORTH 1 �-- D[ TA I L. v co OP 5, _ T T -r Ma �•� G�N>✓RA ' a i : 1 __-_____ ._�__ DATE - j . NORTH ( ALESSANDRO DRIVE) ELEVAT ION PROJECT STATISTICS : S 1 TE' Agf�A : le, 240 rv�Z . eUiL.►IWC-� AF,F-_A ; 711438 �(Sz . FT, ((S1F S5) g SQ. FT. (NET) 2 5a - 25 cA jZ5 REq`p (�2 cPRS Pt2av+ OED� PA R KI N � 'AV i N'. 8/124 So, T. SHEET PAKKI t4� LOY 'L-AtbtTiW 14-22P � , P� CI5 5°6 of PavING, IN ofz SURRouNPING PAR Kt NG LOT), ADDITIONAL- PLANTIPJG''. 9, !�5 . FT TOTAL PLAN—rl WCG: 2�3�ao Sd. Fl: i m z ►- � W W o� W J 2 4 ,4 elk, , . ! PAINT MET. PPS. WEST ELEVATION , ' - o" Tc M"r'�" GTut::rLL , i Z Qdtb a � 0 G `li �ba >04LC, GC�4 /O� (_ 11k) 0 arc , -- ,v W l ! W SOUTH ELEVATION 14'' = �' - o" � VZ � LL C a U. u. W T/F �T �A, r-; 0 low (Lr+�AEKA�'�AND�T�NEn� j 0 —r L AR S ALE ' � a LL � (LA HA e-iz�,A !'caaN v s�-,o j F-i 5T�c��� a W G K � N AINY > (Tc N}AT,7,H EiKoNzE ALU►vt.) � � o N ST Li V G cr z cc Cl)_ i ! � � r. \w ,, .. � � ..,. ,. .. q •:..� ,- - t • •. -, � a � 1?_: 1_� . �! 1.. . ' •� 'v t °1 ,.. y. - a,.. .w'7..- yj t (� w.,, .:. i y`^.. � � ...1 .� .4 _.. 4 ..� , ..v �.e '.� i ,� 'a` Y' 'w"�,. `riw p I r -�-. --_ r>� ! {�($-yY�� __ —_ �•�,��..` ��'_. _ /STucr-C c _� lo EAST ELEVATION ���.'► � t N07F . . r. Q I A �;a _- �� T% r; _,.I 'i'' T xTJ DATE f o i __ . i i� � ------- .�I � �,�,� ��' � � __ � �• -- - n�� � �y't,d C �v V span I `� j i \� i � 1 --—___�1___- MAI �a �, l�.,q� )j - — ------ -- --- n P .S"ti <,",5 tom. ;'{. - °"� s" :� ..., ,..'+ia..t `t;� `fn`i" ,yy,_ ,a,.� Y,-JG r '�,, „ `i > 'cl ,�1 q —�_ o �Q / --- _.. -.s s� }} 0 �",+ o v 't ,.., � , n �` o •.. «.�3 �''L.3" +��L+,!'�J.�`�, .,��` e^" �..; ��.J" V�"Cl.""?;l,i.S�'� R 4,•�` "+ $ 't �� _._._.._ s.._ �, �__. _ kA'� � �'1y pU,4L GI.AZJ�G BR0Nx.� Gi,." 1HE*MNxE ALUM- WlNp rJ PWF- CP4 NINPO % COCATI - NORTH ELEVATION " A�4 INTEFCHAN-'F-A61-E TO SUiTTD4,pN-T EQaIRr-MEt4 SHEET 10