Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPP 86-45 GAS STATION/HIGHWAY111/DEEP CANYON RD 1989 PRECINSE PLAN ( ►' TENTATIVE TRACT ZONE CI-LANCE PARCEL MAP VARIANCE C.U.P. _ REFER TO: APPLICANT: ' LOCATION : Wz REQUEST: PP.�I o n� - 4 1T n n EXISTING ZONE_ PREPARATION PROGRESS DATE BYJ COMMENTS _APPLICATION RECEIVED LEGAL PUBLICATION SENT NOTICES SENT FIELD INVESTIGATION DEPTS. NOTIFIED q BUILDING ENGINEERING FIRE POLICE RECREATION & PARKS SCHOOL DISTRICT [DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS FLOOD CONTROL j_ �. ` PRELIMINARY MEETING OLA" STAFF REPORT of 2-5 QJ1 FINAL PLAN APPROVAL PRECISE PLAN (6) LANDSCAPING PLAN (5) 12-h tap .PLAN.� DIRECTOR MOD. (6) HEARINGS & ACTIONS DATE ACTION VOTE REVIEW BOARD HEARING - lam .3 - P.C. HEARING. PUBLISHED P.C. PUBLIC HEARING APPLICANT NOTIFIED C.C. PUBLIC HEARING .'; ORDINANCE NO. RESOLUTION NO. EFFECTIVE ' DATE RECORDED FOR DATA- BANK ZONING MAP CORRECTED TD DAT TI •E • AM P FROM M O REA CODE- NUMBER H - M ."O• ,OF 'EXTENSION N +a M s E M ' O PHONED ALL NETURNEDjt WANTSTO f'1 WILL C ALLO WAS INC) URGENT BACK CALL F-U SEE VOU AOAIN AIGNER FORM NO.50-176 � t I TO DATE ��II TIME /qM P /O /O V O PM H FRO Q' AREA CODE ( � r - NO. 2///� / / O ✓ / � N _ _ EST - E A c - - - 0 E Q / T6 SSf00 NED PHONED) UGACI JJ CAATURNED RETURNED SEES •� GIq CALL WAS IN URGENT 4 �� 1-�����f; �tOk"�i�,S �� 1� i �'6� 1t �� �C��-�- ��� :���� y�vt��0. c� , . �G� � . ��3� ���( ���� r �; � � �� r BASH JOHN M DEMOS PETER R BASH GLORIA DEMOS RUTH A 45-466 GARDEN SQUARE DEMOS GEORGE D PALM DESERT, CA 92260 P 0 BOX 1532 625-095-004 PALM DESERT, CA 92260 625-3.62-001 i BASH JOHN M DEMOS PETER R BASH GLORIA PALM DESERT LODGE 45-466 GARDEN SQUARE P 0 BOX 1532 PALM DESERT, CA 92260' PALM DESERT, CA 92260 625=].62-009 L.ESLIE FUND INC 3600 W LAKE AVE GLENVIEW; IL 60025 625-100-015 LESLIE FUND INC 3600 Id LAKE AVE GLENVIEW, IL 60025 67 ,-] 00-076 BRONSTEIN WILLIAM BRONSTEIN ROSALYN F . DRIFTWOOD DR PALM . SPRINGS, CA 92262 615-121-006 - 1 CITY OF PALM DESERT TRANSMITTAL LETTER 1 . TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council 11 . REQUEST: Approval of a negative declaration of environmental impact and a precise plan of design to allow construction of a 168 unit inn, a full service restaurant and a gas station on 10 acres in the PC (4) , S.P. and PR (5) , N S.P. at the northeast corner of Highway III and Deep Canyon Road. III . APPLICANT: Thomas Miller Suncastle Real Estate 11753 San Vincente P.O. Box 1739 Los Angeles, CA 90049 Palm Desert, CA 92261 IV. CASE NO PP 86-45 V. DATE: January 8, 1987 VI . CONTENTS: A. Staff Recommendation. B. Discussion. C. Draft Resolution/Ordinance No. D. Planning Commission Minutes involving Case No. PP 86-45. E. Planning Commission Resolution No. 1194. . F. Planning Commission Staff Report dated December 16, 1986. G. Related maps and/or exhibits. A. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve the findings and adopt Resolution No. B. DISCUSSION: The proposed hotel and restaurant plan provides for an attractive architecture and either meet or exceed municipal code requirements. The gas station portion of the project also meets code requirement. Staff has found that the quality of the architecture of the gas station does not compare to that of the hotel reducing the integrity of the entire project. The three components of the project (hotel , restaurant, gas station) are to reflect each other architecturally, tying the components together in a village style. Staff found that sound information provided by the applicant was inclusive in determining that adjacent residential zones would be free of impact from sound generated at the car wash site. TRAMMITTAL LETTER PP 86-45 JANUARY 8, 1907 Planning commission approved the anA te'll-Irst by a 21 0 Vote, conditioned that the at rhiterture of thr on station wi ! I he modified to reflect that of the hotel : that the car wash may 09 nParated only between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and Anno p.m, ; that the car wash also be built so that the door on the north end of the building hall be closed while the car wash is in operationi and that th- date Palms W, the Wtv be maintained and in the event that a date palm dies or requires removal , it Shall he replacled by a tree approved by city staff , Prepared by I It:5 Reviewed and Approved by Q/tm NOTICE OF DETERMINATION Negative Declaration TO: (X) Clerk of the Board of Supervisors ( ) Secretary for Resources County of Riverside 1416 Ninth St. , Rm 1311 4080 Lemon Street Sacramento, CA 95814 Riverside, CA 92502 FROM: CITY OF PALM DESERT 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 SUBJECT: Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108 or 21152 of the Public Resources Code. Project Title/Common Name: Residence Inn/Mobil, Gas, PP 86-45 Date of Project Approval : February 26, 1987 State Clearinghouse Number ( if submitted) : N/A Contact Person: Catherine Sass Project Location: Northeast, corner of Highway III and Deep Canyon Road. Project Description: Ten acre hotel , restaurant and gas station. This is to advise that the City of Palm Desert has made the following determinations regarding the above described project: 1 . The project ( ) will , (X) will not, have a significant effect on the environment. 2. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared in connection with this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. X A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. A copy of the Negative Declaration .may be examined at the above city hall address. 3. Mitigation measures (X) were, ( ) were not, made a condition of the. approval of the project. 4. A statement of . Overriding Considerations ( ,) was, (X) was not, adopted for this project. Signature Title �M ^ i30ARL)OFSUPERVISORS n IL 1E Date Received for Filing NOV C.9 1 987 Please return date-stamped copy in the enclosed envelope. r.,;Awa.raauwev CLERK of the BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ByCounty of Rive-side,State of California i- MINUTES j PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY - NOVEMBER 49, 1986 7:00 P.M. - CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBER 73-510 FRED HARING DRIVE NO STUDY -SESSION WAS HELD PRIOR TO .THE MEETING: 1. CALL TO ORDER Chairman Crites called the meeting to order at 7:06 p.m. I1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Commissioner Erwood led in the pledge of .allegiance. III. ROLL CALL Members Present: Buford Crites, Chairman Bob Downs Rick F_rwood Jim Richards Carol Whitlock Members Absent: None Staff Present: Ray Diaz Tim Connors " Steve Smith Phil. Drell Catherine Sass Dick Folkers Jonathan Van Moyiand Tonya Monroe IV: APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Consideration of Or_tober .7, 19R6 meeting minutes. Action: ' Moved by "Commissioner Downs , seconded by Commissioner Richards, approving the minutes as submitted. Carried 5-0. V. SUMMARY OF COUNCIL ACTION No summary of city council action was given. i MINUTES" �. PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION NOVEMBER 4, 1986 " VI . CONSENT CALENDAR A. Case No. PP 84-34 PD 1I1, Applicant Request for approval of a time extension to March 1 , 1987 for Case No. PP 84-34., Action: Moved by . Commissioner Downs , seconded by Commissioner Whitlock, approving the consent calendar by minute motion. Carried 5-0. Chairman Crites indicated that commission would reorder the items on the agenda to hear Oral Communications, Miscellaneous Item A, Public Hearings A, E, F, B, C, and D in that order. Commission instructed staff to permanently move oral communications on the agenda format. IX. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS MRS. GLORIA KIRKWOOD, 73-401 Salt Cedar, read a letter submitted to the planning commission regarding Lewis Homes constructing site pads at approximately three feet above their fences and expressing a wish for the, planning commission, city council , and city attorney to 1) review immediately what was approved for the Lewis Homes Construction sites as far as streets, sewers, elevations, and walls are concerned; 2) commission, council , attorney, and staff visit each of the homes this week and observe; 3) construction of the Lewis Homes site pads to stop immediately until all pertinent authorities have had the opportunity to see if the construction has been .done in accordance with approved plans; and 4) a representative from staff and city attorney's office to meet with the homeowners to discuss concerns and personal property losses. MR. GARY MORRIS, 73-285 Salt Cedar, consulting engineer. for the property owners on Salt Cedar Street, formally protested the negative impact that the Lewis Homes development will have on the properties because of: invasion of privacy; inappropriate construction pad elevations, restriction of property owners' view,. creation of an environment. conducive to vandalism and burglaries, and lack of adequate perimeter walls. He requested that city representatives meet with .the property owners to discuss an adequate resolution of the problems. Mr . Diaz stated that " staff has been looking into the issue and indicated that meetings and further investigation, will occur. 2 MINUTES PALM DESERT MANNING COMMISSION PL NOVEMBER 4, 1986: Moved by Commissioner Downs, seconded by Commissioner Whitlock, ' adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 1190, approving PP 86-44 and C/Z 86-7. subject to conditions. Carried 5-0. A FIVE MINUTE RECESS WAS CALLED AT 8: 15 P.M. D. Case No. PP 86-45 - THOMAS MILLER, Applicant Request for approval of a negative declaration of - environmental impact and a precise plan of design to allow construction of 168 unit inn, a full service restaurant and a gas station on 10 acres In the PC (4) S.P. and PR-5 N, S.P. at the northeast corner of Highway Ill and Deep Canyon Road. Ms. Sass outlined the salient points of the staff report and noted that conditions had been added per Hidden Palms homeowners' concerns. Staff recommended approval . Commissioner Downs asked for clarification on the service provided by the gas station market. Ms. Sass replied that small items and soda pop would be provided, but not as furl a service as a convenience store, Chairman Crites asked if. there were any, objections to burying the car wash in a ,berm. Ms. Sass did not see .. any problem. and indicated that architectural commission suggested berming and . noted that it would return to architectural commission for final approval . Chairman Crites opened the public testimony and asked if the applicant to address the commission. MR. SANDY BAUM, 45-800 Deep Canyon, indicated he had been working on site for three years and felt it would be .compatible. He indicated that he had met with Hidden Palms on October 18. Commissioner Downs asked if he had met with any other homeowners besides Hidden Palms. Mr. Baum replied no, but indicated that the recess,gave them an opportunity to review the plans. MR. BOB FOSTER, developer for Residence Inn, stated that the project meets the criteria of zoning and indicated that they were working diligently to meet the requirements of the architectural commission. He noted that there would be 22% building coverage and 50% open space provided. He stated that 9 i MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION NOVEMBER 4. 1986 he would work with staff to comply with conditions. Commissioner Richards asked if there was anything unique about this particular Residence Inn. Mr. Foster replied that the Inns are all the same. Commissioner Richards recommended that the applicant study the buildings to the west for tile and arch designs, as well as Hidden Palms architecture. Mr. Foster indicated that he was trying to achieve a design to make most people happy as long as he could retain the basic floor plan. Commissioner Whitlock asked if the gate house provided security. Mr . Foster replied that it .was a registration office. Commissioner Whitlock asked for and received clarification regarding services provided by the restaurant, the usable balcony condition, and air conditioning units. Chairman Crites asked about a provision of a water feature, citing Embassy Suites as an example. Mr. Foster indicated that with the Art in Public Places provision, some kind of detail would be provided. MR. DAVID FLOOD, Santa Monica, described the service station . and car wash services. He indicated that the car wash would only be open during daylight hours . He stated that the buildings would be very, simple in design with a motto of less . Is more. He indicated concurrence with the staff report and asked for approval . Commissioner Richards suggested a more unique village style architecture. Mr. flood replied that a residential look might be inappropriate on a commercial street, would block views, and would be distracting from a simple- looking facility; he felt that a village look would destroy the efficiency of the building. Chairman Crites stated that since this would be .the first building on the highway, the proposed design would not fit in with the city. Mr. Flood indicated that he felt that landscaping was more important, but was willing to respond to the needs of the city. Commissioner Richards suggested that the applicant study the project on Country Club Drive and Monterey Avenue to provide a design that would be compatible with the rest of the city. Chairman Crites asked if anyone .present wished to speak in FAVOR or OPPOSITION to the proposed. MR. GERRIT GOUDSWAARD, 44-755 Deep Canyon, felt that this was a. very difficult corner and that while the hotel would provide a significant improvement, any access onto Deep Canyon would create problems. He also stated that there was no such thing as a .quiet service station and recommended that the car wash be eliminated. Chairman Crites asked the applicant if he was providing blow dryers and If he could provide noise standard 10 MINUTES PALM oEsERT PLANNING commissioN NOVEMBER 4. I98b data. Mr. Flood replied that there were a few blowers inside, but it was basically a drip dry setup and also indicated that he did not have noise data at this time. MR. RICHARD WELBY, Desert Sun Apartments to the west, spoke regarding the access off of Alessandro and the horrendous problems because of narrowness. Mr. Folkers stated that the Intersection of Alessandro and Deep Canyon would be right-turn in and right-turn out of the complex' If a problem develops. Mr. Folkers also stated that ,a super block concept was being studied. Chairman Crites asked Mr. Folkers what he would recommend as a condition of. approval to stipulate this. Mr. Folkers .replied that it was already provided. MR. VIC EFFINGER, 44-539 Sorrento Court, indicated that he was a member of the board of the homeowners association. He stated that he met with Mr.. Foster and advised that he meet with the homeowners in February and he had agreed_ He expressed concern . with traffic in and out onto Deep Canyon and felt that the bushes and trees seriously blocked the view. He stated that the architectural design .of the station did not fit in with their housing development or the other buildings. He also expressed concern over noise from the car wash and-service station. MR. KEN STENDELL , 44-675 Monaco Circle, informed commission that he bought his house two and a half years ago and. has been looking forward to , a project such as this. He expressed concern regarding the grading level to the, north because of drainage, security during construction, suggested an alternate route and location for garbage disposal , indicated that this project should not have a PA system like Embassy Suites that tan be heard on Saturdays and Sundays, the project should comply with the city's 30 foot height requirement, and asked about the gas station business hours . Mr. Flood replied 24 hours. Commissioner Richards .indicated that hours of operation could be limited. Mr. Diaz stated that security during construction could be helped by requiring a fence to screen the construction site and felt that the trash enclosures might be located in the southeast portion of the site. Mr. Diaz indicated that a condition be placed that the PA system have limited hours, indicated that the drainage issue could not be addressed at this time. Mr. Foster replied that someone would be on duty at night and that there should not be a problem with the PA system. He indicated that 11 MINUTES . PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION NOVEMBER 4.. 1986 he was meeting with Haver & Associates and Mr. Folkers to resolve the drainage issue. Commissioner Richards noted that. the cost for hook-up to the . storm drain was a seven figure number. Mr. Foster replied that the city might participate and that there was discussion regarding water retention, Mr. Foster also indicated that there were no plans to change the elevation to effect the homeowners in the rear. Mr. Folkers indicated . that with the increasing concern for elevations, they would look at Hidden Palms' elevation so that there wouldn't be any controversy. Mr. Folkers also concurred that storm drain hook-up was a seven figure number and that negotiations. were under way with Indian Wells, but was moving slowly. He indicated that water would not be a problem to Hidden Palms but indicated that the Las Lagos area was still under study. Commissioner Richards requested more input regarding grading and placing a condition that grading will not be raised more .than one foot . Mr. Folkers replied that this would not be a problem. Commissioner Richards felt the developer or architect should be involved. Commissioner Erwood stated that the concerns were noise, air conditioning units, car wash and recommended that a sound study be done and a study of traffic on Deep Canyon.. He also felt that the design of the gas station could be improved. He felt that the applicant would be a good neighbor and would work with staff. He recommended a two week continuance. Commissioner Whitlock agreed with the two week continuance. Commissioner, Richards noted that the project would be along Highway III and felt that a noise study was not needed and that the air, conditioning units should not be a problem--architectural commission would review them. Regarding traffic, he felt. that public works would work on it and drainage was being studied. Action: Moved by Commissioner Erwood, seconded by Commissioner Whitlock, continuing PP 86-45 to November 18, 1986. Carried 4-1 (Commissioner Richards voting no) . , Commissioner Richards noted that a full Environmental Impact Report had been completed for this area which could provide information. 12 . " MINUTES. PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSIOK ` NOVEMBER 49 1986 X. COMMENTS Mr. Folkers Introduced Jonathan Van Moyland, a new member of public works,. to the planning commission. He explained that Mr. Van Moyland would be the public works liaison to the planning commission. X1. ADJOURNMENT Moved by Commissioner Downs; seconded ,by Commissioner Whitlock, adjourning the meeting. Carried 5-0. The meeting adjourned at.9:50 p.m. Wliec -tar ; RAM A. DIAZ, ATTEST: , BUFORD ITES, Chairman tm - 13 INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM City of Palm Desert TO: CITY MANAGER ANDCITY COUNCIL FROM: DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT/PLANNING DATE: MARCH 12, 1987 SUBJECT: RESOLUTION FOR 'PP. 86-45 APPLICANT:. ;Thomas, Miller Sandy Baum 11753 San Vincente P.O. Box 1739 Los. Angeles, CA 90049 Palm Desert, CA 92261 Attached is a copy of the resolution council requested with the amended conditions. to allow construction of a gas station as part of the Residence Inn project at. the northeast corner of Highway III and .Deep Canyon Road. Staff recommends adoption of the resolution:. RAMON A. IAZ DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT/PLANNING RAD/tm (619) 340-4184 24 Hr. PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, INC. 73-260 El Paseo, Suite 3A, Palm Desert, CA 92260 C� January 5 , 1987 Mr. Ramon A. Diaz , SecretaryL`j�+����q Palm Desert Planning Commission C� City of Palm Desert JAN 7 1987 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, California 92260 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY Of PALM DESERT RE: PP 86-45 Dear Mr. Diaz : Since writing the enclosed letter to you on October 24 , 1986 (Attachment 1) , we have received a letter from Mr . Bob Foster of Banner Associates (Attachment 2) , who appeared before the Board on October 18 , 1986 assuring that "varing amounts of attention" would be given to our concerns. The Association Board of Directors wanted something legally enforceable from the developer that would protect our development' s interests (we. had received verbal assurances from Mr . Soloman when the Embassy Suites development was being proposed and almost none of his assurances were honored) . Mercury Property Management, at the Board ' s direction, contacted a "land-use lawyer" and was told that the instrument we needed was an "Equitable Servitude" document. Pursuing this, Mercury wrote Sandcastle Real Estate (Attachment 3) We've received a response from Banner Associates (Attachment 4) stating that he. could not comply because "as a matter policy and good business practice" . The developer, Mr. Foster, has assured me that as the planning matures he will continue to consult with me.. It should be clear to you that assurances made are not documented in plans or specifications sufficient for review by the Homeowners Association. We request that the assurances be supplied by the developer in the form of detailed plans and spcifications addressing the homeowners concerns and that the developer be required to meet and confer with the undersigned. It was to avoid this process that the Equitable Servitude document was requested. Since Mr. Foster reiterated his assurances , it is only fair that they be supplied to the Homeowners Association in the correct form for a careful review. We assume that Mr. Foster and the property owner, Mr . Thomas Miller are dealing in good faith with you and our Homeowners Association however, without detailed plans and specifications we cannot protect the 211 members of the Association. S ncerely, A w�I ick SmaYt, Ir sident Hidden Palms Homeowners Association Regional Offices Irvine • Rancho Cucamonga • San Clemente • Brentwood South Bay • Downtown Los Angeles • Palm Desert • La Jolla 51[E 7fu � PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, INC. (st s) 340 4184 24 Hr. 73-260 El Paseo, Suite 3A, Palm Desert, CA 92260 October 24, 1986 Mr. Ramon A. Diaz , Secretary I Palm Desert Planning Commission City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, California 92260 RE: PP 86-45 Dear Mr. ,Diaz: A presentation was made to the Board of Directors of Hidden Palms Homeowners Association by the developers of the planned Inn, restaurant and gas station at the corner of Highway 111 and Deep Canyon Road. . The Board of Directors has no objection to the basic concept but would like the following assurances from the developer kept in mind if permission to build is granted. 1. That there be no usable balconies on the North side of their property facing toward Hidden Palms. 2. Confirmation of the 124 foot set back from the building line to .the Hidden Palms wall. 3. That a minimum of two rows of existing date palms remain as a barrier between the Hidden Palms wall and the proposed parking area. 4. That additional planting be done under the date palm barrier to a height capable of softening the effect of only seeing the palm tree trunks from 'Hidden Palms. 5 . That they prefer tile to be used at the gas station building, rather than metal. 6 . .That no obtrusive lighting be done on the North side to illuminate the hot water building, parking area or planned amenities. 7. That the trash enclosure be moved -from the Northwest corner for noise and odor consideration. All of the above requests are to help those residents of Hidden Palms along the back wall of the proposed development to maintain the quiet enjoyment of their property. Sincerely, Dick Dick Smart, President HIDDEN PALMS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION Regional Offices Irvine . Rancho Cucamonga • San Clemente • Brentwood South Bay •, Downtown Los Angeles • Palm Desert • La Jolla OCTEL BANNER 3 ,� R�o October 28, 1986 Mr. Dick Smart, President Mr. Vic Hasler, Vice President J� Mr. Vic Effinger, Treasurer Mr. Barry Baricza, Secretary Ms. Dorothy Twigg, Director Hidden Palms Homeowners Association % Mercury Property Management 73-260 El Paseo, Suite 3A Palm Desert, California 92260 Dear Officers, Directors and Friends: I sincerely thank you very much for your time and allowing me to visit your meeting Saturday, October 18 in Palm Desert. Further, I appreciate the positive, constructive position you have taken toward my development. I am confident you will not be disappointed with the =i final product. Among the items discussed which we agreed would receive varying �k amounts of attention are: The North balconies f '. Distance from the property line to building setback Landscaping consideration given to the retaining of trees and additional plantings Sri Light factors involved in putting greens, etc. or amenities ? that might be bordered along your property lines F:Ix, �• N Trash containers and .their location in respect to your property Assurance there are no carports j j It is my understanding you want me to attend your February meeting. 1 I will do so and during the interim period I will report periodically ; and specifically if there are marked changes in our development package. P Y 9 P P 9 $d'"? You are aware I desire and need your cooperation to accomplish this (wt.> development, and I will do my very best to insure that this is a quality development. Again, thank you very much, and I will be seeing you. er Y truly Yours, Bob Foster RCF/kf BANNER " '.. . ASSOCIATES 1900 NO.AMIDON - sk i SUITE 205 - • ... P.O. BOX 4165 WICHITA,KS 67204 (316)838-7701 - PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, INC. (619) 340 4184 24 Hr. 73-260 El Paseo, Suite 3A, Palm Desert,.CA 92260 December 2, -1986 Mr. Sandy Baum Suncastle Real Estate P.O. Box 1739 Palm Desert, California• 92261 RE: HIDDEN PALMS -HOMEOWNERS Dear Mr. Baum: The Board of Directors of. Hidden Palms Homeowners Association would like to know if the owner of the property at the corner of Highway 111 and Deep Canyon would follow up his assurances of the Board's concerns in a legal manner. They would like to have an equitable servitude drawn up by an attorney listing the items of concern talked about at the meeting which the owner assured them would be taken into consideration when building. As you probably know, when the Embassey Suites was in the planning stages the developer made many assurances to the Board and then did not live up to his promises. Rather than go through that again,, they would like a firm committment. Sincerely, Diane Campbell Project Manager DC Regional Offices Irvine • Rancho Cucamonga • San Clemente • Brentwood i South Bay,, • Downtown Los Angeles • Palm Desert • La Jolla BANNER December 10, 1986 Mr. Sandy Baum � Suncastle Real Estate P.O. Box 1739 Palm Desert, California 92261 Re: Hidden Palm homeowners letter of December 2, 1986 Dear Sandy: I have received a copy of the homeowners letter written by Diane Campbell , where they request I enter into equitable servitude in order to satisfy them of complying with previously given assurances. These assurances were given to pro- vide the homeowners comfort about the planned development on the site con- tiguous and South of the homeowners' fee parcel . As a matter of policy and good business practice, I cannot enter into a legal agreement to provide the assurances given, but I firmly believe that the Palm Desert Planning Commission and the City of Palm Desert will insure that I comply with the plan submitted and approved. As you know, I have other masters to serve, including lenders, and I cannot -contract to the Hidden Palm homeowners. It isn't good business to make a contract ' "ithat might require arbitrage +'. But the items of concern and assurances given are as follow: k= (1 ) Unobtrusive lighting on the North side of the project. .. .. . (2) No balconies affording visibility on' the North side of the project '(visibility to Hidden,Palm homeowners'. property) . . (3) No trash pickups along and within certain reasonable distances from the North fence, i.e. the homeowners' property. (4) Individual style heating and air conditioning units. (5) Assurances there will not be any intrusive PA system noise. (6) There will be landscape considerations to retainage of date palms and ' other additional plantings along the North border. h' r BANNER V�'� .. fd - ASSOCIATES - =' 1900 NO:'AMIDON .� . < SUITE 205- _ - PO.BOX 4165 - y' WIC1M KS 67204 i (31 838.7701 n k ¢ Y ". Mr. Sandy Baum A December 10, 1986 Page 2 (7) No "'carports I believe this covers every topic discussed I have written an assurance letter dated October 28 reciting most of these items, and I re-emphasize the assurance. Very truly yours, Bob Foster d; RCF/kf ` i y'F�°1 t a'n -« y't v� :r g12�' t< - � f { '+i t -"e r , �4.'S{ r,": .. _ �,T; i„y �-7 •. 4 L i h t . ,_ c r Cm j P_P 8(o-L4 esNden(.e—My)q 4—Dee-t' • (I CL\nyoyl—�oc,d:_Nex{_�o-E.mk�.sx�=���eS. • . - �• I- - - - -ni�.-home-E:el-��-le_�-nn-o�-1.O_o�.:�6 II' . CvN-o�-01— cor-rie,�-ond�-csc�ni•4e��_ _�c.:ll. �,.:�x�� ►n�-c� • • � • � �'� ��e_who\e calce,�'� � • - I - T�C1�\S-1S-�GVS-off,oAYn�Di�leS�-c�1�h-Uni�.SCirc1-i.n��}�eY, d_in.c�sA. ew_rat.io.v�_ Ocial_�.6bblew�_Q_v�_E W �� � oWS•—r11_iqb -a��c�e1�_b�_co-nn-ec - -i_Sc_ceq ►n 2�M-Q--l.l:�l°tn v� - PJuild i-n p, oc��,S-o_►�_�- -�xt G� cro�uded� Nr - ' . e7a;c� c wk� os w�v, be kocc,F--.. �� •�-�'a��_c�,1Co-v�-rCrvwy a1 0�;1��_enn"s •cov_r f II and-�«vs`o R anot4 er = i e. --Qt„ed slcleu- Y3- - I. K • 1 -�i-5-_l_an.d�c�e��k��utC�_M��C.h-�n.lo��v �s_ . . . au�.d�_,-n�ca�`.�on-i►��o_�n�'�ce-�r��ec.�-w i�h. II � '(v�ort�M�,,�o.r�'• Zc��-c�-(�t.i:��_�p-�sc�l��ure_� e • r \ 4R, or If, ck A, 4, '0- -WLW IN P W1 -4' of 1 �4 A wh ''`,:aaw v y S. F if 71 Ad YA sh, A11 -n Al T Al A A4 7f, 1.z K-W �eyL * P.P7, LID rY .r f Y .1J-PainSrl a -11 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 December, 22, 1986 I . , CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE CASE NO. PP 86-45 I NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearina will be held before the Palm Desert City Council to consider a request by THOMAS MILLER for RESIDENCE INN to construct a 168 unit 'inn, a restaurant and a gas station on the north- east corner of Highway III and Deep Canyon Road, also described as: APN 625-100-004.4, 6 0.15, 016 021 , 022 .Hn IiI SP 1�pll I II I ., -I 1 1 "I III J (l{; .. /•j - 1ao.' e" 'n 5.01 I fig P.R.-3, N I I IR a 47,1113-. xul v; 0 10,00 N ..q-I .. R•1 R I �_1 R71 Rri I •e��l R R-I. I4OS f P I R•I P I n s R I, R I J.000'.P 100 13 00f I:RR 5'1{i i I of I. O R3141J I"L7 C•LS.P. c sr 2i hgilglj's: F.C.(41,R' S.P. R ! Q w t! A -I-9.9 C-I,S.P.1. �: �.Pi Ci;S.R -i,E-1. 9.P. •• C-I,SR aT^ C-I, C-I,SI " .1 3 l41 5 P PC.In)S,P. r. .0 1,SA p_ 1 I C-177F - R, 1 -uPZ/ R-3(41 P.R.-6 RJ1141 - RNJC20,000 (DCOR1R3d Intl a o p R-] (31 R-3 13000 (3) R-3 13,000 (31. R3 J-J R-I 10000 "RT7-r(' as S 0-1 12.000 +., n.oeo +.,, ; P „ s P.. _ R .... -1 20,000 R-I I6,000 "" ?CUPPA_01. 4 POI.` IG�P03-i3 °� R-110.000- - " PL.1 P R-I Rr1 20,000 • q-120,000 1 R I - R-1 R-1 : ..R-L.. .. .. _ .. -•ae,o4o,. : (41 ..... .i' .. 1 R-I OCJOC 0 �]R R1 �R11 R1I. ' R-130,0 , O.S. ,^`.• _ I : 1R • T ; R 30.0 O.S. �1 .. w f ' 4wo ,1� OP � il+o,en w[us on uuls f r •i e;000 O.S. 1�f—�—�-0 -l:•,...r.i+.+M1-M1�.�:�-e.r-.-�__ l •+M1.a,..a�6^1-wpr�..+rn"1. SAID public hearing will be held on Thursday. January 8. 1987 at 7:00 p.m. In the Council Chamber at the Palm Desert City Hall . 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert. California, at which time and place all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. If you challenge the -proposed actions in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else _ raised at' the public hearing described in this notice. or in written correspondence delivered to the city council (or planning commission) at, or Prior to, the public hearing. PUBLISH: Desert Post SHEILA R. GILLIGAN, City Clerk December 26, 1986 City of Palm Desert. California f - 111 . , _ - - - -�-��---��-1•'-ern-.�'i���� •� x ��• t.t• � •l.. 1 . _� II l 1 hh .. fC .: .,. � a 1 /�QY- _. .� R _..' �.y.• .. - • r • r . vt sm • t` C(1� t-<v-1-�J •� F V-C�"�J�-w , _n Ip,_ i�.�— s)_1 ` �. -��+w h• d .s • _Stn Cteesd c� O 1�_.t_ � •s > • I a. .." Y .i'7-r �j. M t 1 1: r� . r. `,�.. - ate. I'' • , +• ' . ., � _ � , _ r _ -� ,�� _ ; ' , w RESIDENCE INN - PP 85-43 Summary of modifications in Review Process 1ST SITE PLAN First Revisions Re uy ested I . Remove one tennis court.2. Create staggered rows of units alI over project, s1miIar to staggering shown on north row of plan. 3. Remove volleyball court from date palm grove. 4. Match landscape setbacks of Embassy Suites .(40 feet) . 5. Use medians and landscaping to provide For better circulation and . integration of entire project .- ' Suggested a fountain and patterned concrete. 6. Problem with sidewalks that Dead to no where. 7. Victorian architecture - problem with inappropriate style, materials (wood) and color selection for desert environment. Needs adequate solar protection. - . 8. . With a 10 foot building separation the linear building design needed to be broken up to avoid visual crowding and monotony. 9. Roof pitch would have to be reduced to meet ordinance requirements of 30 'feet (was 32 feet) . 10. the industrial type of gas station should be replaced by an architecture to match the hotel , creating a village style project . 2ND SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL Further Revisions Requested 1 . A second access to Deep Canyon at the north portion of the site. 2.. The architecture was revised to spanish accents on victorian by addition of the roofs and stucco finish. Directed to go one step further. 3. Meandering sidewalks to be provided around perimeter of the site (gas station) . 4. Reduce number of bays to three to ,allow for a 15 foot landscape setback off Highway 111. 5. Gas station directed to be more compatible. FINAL SUBMITTAL The applicant added additional architectural improvements in the form of trim, mission style windows, and an additional entryway fountain. the gas station removed a bay and otherwise remained unchanged. T. I t - y' • i 1. 5 • i ) ��• � ��/1/�- _�1� � 'rf�Vl/I�11 �.( •'. , I/S(/bYli,S�/w n' '� _ R ' I� ' _•' _ .. .. /•jam -5 '- �' c ... .. � � •"� . K. ,. -r - _ � a � — — a -- 7524 GOUDSWAARD GERRIT J WEINSTEIN JOSEPH GOUDSWAARD CARLENE H WEINSTEIN SELMA 44755 DEEP CANYON RD. JOSEPH TR & SELMA TR WEINSTEIN PALM DESERT, CA 92260 607 S HILL ST ' STE 921 -- 625-075-oo6 LOS ANGELES, CA 90014 615-093-003 WOODS BARRIE J TURNER ROGER EBERT MAESCHEN STAN L TURNER MARY STANLEY 44775 DEEP CANYON RD. 1200 QUAIL NO 16o PALM DESERT, CA 92260 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 625-075-007 625-093-005 it THOMAS ELLIS G KENNY MARION L 'HOMAS MARIE N 1 44835 DEEP CANYON RD 6r,i11 LANGLEY CANYON RD PALM DESERT, CA 92260 S/•.LINAS, CA 93907 625-093-oo6 625-093-001 WEINSTEIN JOSEPH PETTINGILL EDWIN B WEINSTEIN SELMA PETTINGELL DORIS JOSEPH TR & SELMA TR WEINSTEIN 44805 DEEP CANYON RD 607 S HILL ST STE 921 PALM DESERT, CA 92260 LOS ANGELES, CA 90014 625-093-007 625-093-001 G TURNER ROGER EBERT BASH JOHN M TURNER MARY SATNLEY BASH GLORIA 1200 QUAIL NO 160 45-466 GARDEN SQUARE NEWPORT BEACH, CA 9266o PALM DESERT, CA 92260 615-093-004 615-095-003 *03- 4�v No I rz� t lK 3A zt A--026 49 40 4, J., F 16, Mobil Oil Corporation February.18., 1.987, AV FLB 191981 Ramon A. Diaz Director of Community Development. Coke URw DEVELpPf;i NT DEP Rin'E{vT City of Palm Desert city i pwpl IESEet 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 RE: PP-86-45 MOBIL STATION DEEP `CANYON'&' I'll PALM DESERT . Dear Mr. Diaz: In the City Council Meeting of February 12, 1987, the members of the Council raised 3 major concerns; (1) the car wash, (2) hours of operation, and (3) items to be sold in the Mobil Mart. In reference to item one, Mobil would be willing to withdraw its application for the car wash if that would help the approval of the project.. Mobil originally proposed a 24-hour operation to best serve the community, The Residence Inn and the late night motoring public. Due to the Council's concerns, I would be willing to propose to Mobil Management that the station be operated 6 to 12. While I can appreciate concerns one might have against operation to midnight, I believe the community will find our operation no more objectionable than the Residence Inn, who has agreed to locate next to us. The extensive landscaping and modern efficient down lighting will prevent any light spillage off of our site, and, of course, we will not have any automotive repair work, just gasoline and snack sales. Since the operation is computer controlled, no bells or noise will be generated from the site. In my opinion, the residents on Deep Canyon, the closest being over 300 feet away, will not be adversely impacted by the station. In fact, the station will be shielded from view by most homes due to The Residence Inn. The operation of the Mobil,Mart will be restricted to items like: (1) Soft drink (10) Hostess & Frito Lay type (2) Chips and Nuts products. (3) Jucie (11) Ice Cream - individual (4) Milk (less than quart, I sizes, pints or smaller. size) (12) Coffee (prepared) (5) Prepared Sandwiches (13) Health & Beauty Aids (Already made) like aspirin or toothpaste. (6) Film & Batteries (14) Automotive supplies like oil (7) Cigarettes & Lighters and maintenance items. (8) Chewing Gum (15) Small bags of ice. (9) Candy & Mints (16) Prepackaged cookies & crackers. Items we will not sell: (1) Beer & Wine (2) Canned goods such as vegatable or fruits (3) Sandwiches which are prepared on site - like Arco's hamburgers. (4) No fresh produce - lettuce or similar (5) No meats - other than Jerky-type snacks The Council was also concerned about the items stacked outside on the porch. I would be willing to have a restriction against outdoor displays. As one can see, the items we wish to sell are not the type of food one would make a trip to the "Mobil station" for, however, the Residence In_ n with their full individual kitchens might find it convenient to buy'some of the items. . This, of" course, would reduce the guests' need to drive to a market. Mobil is very desirous of building a facility that we and the City can be proud of. As you know, we have worked many long and hard hours with the City on station layout, landscaping, architecture and believe Mobil will be an asset to Deep Canyon and Highway 111 and the community. Sincerely, H. Huntsberry Q Senior Real Estate Representative 0677P/mlt n FROM:. Nirliar ;Y. Xtilkers 'WREE OF PUBLIC WORKS EXT. 461 TO. i /Z v`l 7, -,2 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE A G+�OC i PALM DESERT,CA 92260 46 V I . -- �. STAfE:OF QLIFORNIA--BUSINESS, TRANSPORTATI"._..A HOUSING AGENCY GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN, Governor DEVARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 8, P. 0. BOX 231 SAN BERNARDINO, CA. 92402 February 10, 1988 Permit No. 08-87-6-CD-0718 08-RIV-111-38. 02/38. 13 RECEIVED Mr. Thomas Miller ,FED 2 21988 74-390 Highway 111 Palm Desert, . C1A 92260 ENGINEERING DEPARTN1Fr. I Dear Mr. Miller : CITY OF PALM DESERT We have reviewed your plans for widening the highway and providing a driveway and right-turn lanes along the northerly side of Highway 111 between Deep Canyon Road and 600' east in the City of Palm Desert. Signal and Storm Drain plans will be reviewed when they are received. Signing and Striping plans must also be provided. A "No Right-Turn" sign shall be installed in the driveway. The driveway east of Deep Canyon Road, between Parcels 2 and 3, is restricted to right turns only, ingress and egress ; however, this must not be accomplished by placing a raised island in the middle of driveway (Sheet #2) . Any dividing curbs at the driveway must remain outside of State right-of-way. To prohibit left turns at this driveway, a raised median on Highway 111 is required from Deep Canyon Road to the access for the Granada Royal Hotel . It should be noted that this is Condition #14 of the Conditions of Approval for PM 22285. These plans should include the conditioned raised median on Highway 111 . Presently in the conceptual stage of review, is a proposed realignment of Deep Canyon Road at Highway 111 . This plan was presented by the same engineering firm (Charles Haver and Associates ) to receive our input for the City of Palm Desert. The work in these street improvement plans should be coordinated with the proposed Deep Canyon Road realignment project to avoid costly reconstruction of highway or signal improvements. It should be noted that the City' s realignment project proposes to close the North Frontage Road while these plans (Sheet #2) indicates the North Frontage Road to remain open. This should be resolved, hopefully in favor of closing the . Frontage Road, before the permit is issued. The driveway, discussed in the first paragraph of this letter is too wide: We suggest a 40' -wide driveway without the patterned concrete indicated within State right-of-way (Sheet #2) . The northwest corner of Deep Canyon Road and Highway Ill should have a 35' radius on the curb return (assuming the Frontage Road is Mr.. -Thomas Miller Page 2 `February 10, 1988 closed) and the 52' half-width should continue westerly on Highway III for some distance. Again, this should be coordinated with the Deep Canyon realignment project. The cross sections appear acceptable ; however, aggregate base (0. 5' minimum thickness ) should be extended under the proposed curb and gutter on the Typical Section for Highway Ili (Sheet #1 ) . The beginning and ending of overlayment, currently proposed at Stations 1167+55 and 1173+33 should meet the existing pavement at right angles to the highway centerline (Sheet #2) . The plans should have normal general notes indicating : 1 . Encroachment Permit is required from .Caltrans" prior to doing any work within the State highway right-of-way. 2. All work within the highway right-of-way shall be to" State standards. 3. Structural section indicated for highway is for estimating only. Actual section to be determined after grading and appropriate . laboratory- tests. A T. I . of 10. 50 should be used in the design of the highway section. The Class 2 A. B. must extend under the curb "and gutter . The work area must be overlayed so that all longitudinal joints fail on lane lines as directed by the State' s Representative. Any overlayment must begin and end at right angles to the curb. It appears that there may be - some ponding at. the east end of the curb. Please furnish flowline elevations. Since the State does not maintain meandering sidewalks or patterned concrete driveways , we desire that the City provide a letter that . relieves the State from any responsibility for such maintenance. This letter must be submitted before we issue the permit. An environmental document should be submitted for our review. If this information i.s"not received within 45 calendar days from the date of this letter, ,your application will be denied. We will continue processing this application upon receipt of 5-sets of revised plans ( folded 8-1/2" x 1111 ) addressing our comments. If you have technical questions, please call Bill Heasley. at (714) 383-4526. 'Mr . Thomas Miller Page 3 February 10, 1988 Please identify all materials submitted in response to this letter as resubmittal in order to effect more expeditious handling of the same. If possible, please identify all revised plans with a "Revised Plan" stamp showing date of revision. . It is extremely important that the transmittal letters and any other communication include the Caltrans Permit Number.' For questions regarding permit status, please call Pat Spindler at/�(714) 383-4501. S /nc' relYr - -. i A T0N10 E.VCINARES Assistant District Permit Engineer MINUTES OF PHONE CONVERSATION PROJECT: Allies - Palm Desert PROJECT NO. : 88-470 DATE/TIME: 6-1-88/10 a.m. PARTICIPANTS: Katherine Sass (KS) - Palm Desert - Planning Department Jerry Dennehy (JD) - Scheer Braden Architects (SBA) SUMMARY: Discussion of Preliminary approvals required. 1. An Architectural-Design Review process is necessary. Staff,_ ,approual _pr— �eess only: 2. Submittal to include: �o a. application; b. $50.00 fee; C. six sets of bluelines (site, floor, building elevations) , one _ set of colored elevations; and d. agent authorization letter. 3. Review occurs twice a month -- second and fourth Tuesdays. Figure six week process. 4. Footprint, and restaurant use has been previously approved. 5. Exterior elevations should be compatible with approved adjacent hotel , and gas station exterior materials. 6. KS will mail application and necessary submittal information .to SBA. Please review contents of conversation summary at your earliest convenience. Go`ntact=me_, -mmed_iate-y should you differ with account of the dialogue. N0 00re IMV P.A Respectfully Sub ' tted, Gr I-Dt�Yl J Dennehy A roject Architect cc: Particiapnts Dick Powers - Marriott Corporation File • • ' - so2 CAL /98a 7 City of Palm 'Desert Planning :Department 73-510 'Fred Waring Drive a Palm, Desert, . CA 92260 Attention: Katherine .Sass ..,. a 31rlrr�,l,Ir��1;GJl„II r,r:��Gil 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 rt January 20, *1987 ,° nF ttin <..<.- >.rrG filt> iw{tai � -�F y:dy; t.xg,_:j.. 65f � fY::P4•f,..., hY i^a S:t i.� iCr •¢ . _ ., St ' l - , $`�t1' {1.;kq�.} a .� F'#t:.�.i , .- ✓YS,451 LYr!s, r�- . .. s. V7_`t:� '- _ _ Mr. Dick Smart, President 'Hidden•Palms Homeowners Association 73-260 E1 Paseo, Suite .3At ; Pa lm. Desert, CA 92260iI„ c.i+ ,.r. .;fLes' ;tray b� In force. _ Dear Mr. Smart: ? Enclosed pleaser,findtthe conditionsof,approval for; precise. plan86-45�known as the ,Residence.Inn. . , v1 rx , Please note that ,the concerns, of the Hidden Palms property owners were addressed throughCommunity;t ,Deve t,lopmen conditions 8 a-g as part of the projects approval . ' i',s, .F We hope thIs .. InformatIon addresses the concerns of your January 5, 1987 correspondence. Sincerely, C Catherine Sass Assistant Planner Am s , s- Mobil Oil Corporation 1255 CORPORATE CENTER DRIVE MONTEREY PARK,CALIFORNIA 91754 7611 February 4, 1987 City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Dr. Palm Desert, CA 92260 RE: HIGHWAY 111 & DEEP CANYON PALM DESERT City Council Members : T In the January 9, City Council meeting, some questions were raised regarding the proposed service station/Mobil mart/carwash development. The major concerns as I recall were visual impact on the neighbors to the north, night operation and concern about the noise generated from the carwash. At the scheduled hearing of February 12, Mobil will have computer enhanced exhibits showing the view of the facilities from Alessandro and from 200 feet further north on Deep Canyon. I think you will be able to agree that the visual impact will be minimal. The widening of Deep Canyon, the extensive landscaping and berming along Deep Canyon and the more than 40 feet of set back of the carwash from Deep Canyon will minimize any concern one might have, P To help you visualize the location of the structures I have arranged for the carwash and gasoline facility to be staked off on the lot. This will be done on February 9 and should give you a feel for how far away from Deep Canyon the improvements will be placed. ° The night operation concern should be alleviated due to the location of the facilities as mentioned above. The lighting is all designed to focus down and will have little spillage onto adjacent property. The carwash noise as explained by Ryco Carwash Co. will be similar to the existing street noise: Also Mobil will only operate the carwash during daylight hours and will install automatic doors which will close when the wash is in operation. I think you will find that the noise will not be a problem. Should you wish to see a similar operation of the proposed facility, Mobil has just opened a Mobil mart/carwash at Date Palm and Ramon. This facility is similar to the subject except for architecture, layout and the carwash does not have automatic doors. i Sincerely, J. H. Huntsberry Sr. Real Estate Representative 1131T/1 - I Page 2 cc: Barrie J. Woods 44775 Deep Canyon Palm Desert, CA 92260 Marion Kenny 44835 Deep Canyon Palm Desert, CA 92260 Gerrit J. Goodswaard 44755 Deep Canyon Palm Desert, CA 92260 Bruce Pettingell 44805 Deep Canyon Palm' Desert, CA 92260 1131T/2 JHH/cad GOODWIN JERRY I HIDDEN PALMS HOMEOWNERS ASSN GOODWIN MERILYN D 0 BOX 792 C/O JERRY I GOODWIN DODGE INC RANCHO MIRAGE CA 92270 11.10 W. ORANGETHORPE AVE h25-420-065 FULLERTON CA 92633 . 625-420-037 I JOHNSON MERVIN B PALM DESERT CONTINENTAL INN INC 400 N TUSTON STE 231. 11350 EXECUTIVE DR STE 125 SANTA ANA . CA 92705 SAN DIEGO CA 92121 625-420-038 6;'7-11 �0-Oh2 ADLFP GEORGE ADI ER LARRY C/O LARRY ADLER 200 , ? COMMUNITY ST U3 CANOGA PARK CA 91306 625-/120-039 LEGGFT"I C PETER LEGGFTT CAROL M 73L' 1°1 I-AS .PALMAS i FUI_I_.ERTON CA 92635 i25-112f.i-_040 � I l AI K i NS R I CHARD E 7OC. S BERENDO ST I.OS ANGELES CA 90005 • rye . . . 4 .♦ ,M Y- ; : T 0 , `y.• . * 1 [ 1-9�—.�.�V a v. 1. • • l .- .. - t' r� i�e � y •� { r« l - 1, � n . f LA4 ^ ; a r " I GG i 4 � • jj� - y r - III�LLLIII'!!! 'r UI br, cr ♦., >. ✓ • C PALM DESERT RESIDENCE INN POTENTIAL PLANT LIST BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE CONDITION TREES Magnolia grandiflora Southern Magnolia 30 in. Box Melaleuca laucadendra Cajeput Tree 15 gal. Cont. Schinus terebinthifolius Brazilian Peppertree 24 in. Box Quercus ilex Holly Oak 24 in. Box Pyrus calleryana 'Bradford' Bradford Pear 24 in. Box Prunus cerasifera ' Atro' Purple Leaf Plum 15 gal. Cont. Chamaerops humilis Mediterranean. Fan 24 in. Box Palm Washingtonia filifera " California Fan Palm 24--in. Box Arecastrum anacardioides Queen Palm 24 in. Box -- P Date Palm ----- -15 ..gal...:._..-_ Cant.. Phoenix robeni Pygmy 24 in. Box Cupaniopsis anacardioides Carrotwood 15 gal. Cont. Podocarpus macrophillus. Yew Pine 15 gad. Cont. Ficus Benjamina Weeping Fig Quercus suber : . Cork Oak 24 .in. Box . Brachychiton populneus. Bottle-.,Tree 24 in: Box Rhus lancea African Sumac 15 gal.. Cont. Cercidium microphyllum Littleleaf .Palo 24 in. Box Verde - Prosopis glandulosa Honey Mesquite 24 in. Box SHRUBS Caesalphinia gilliesii Yellow Bird of 5 gal. Cont. Paradise Callistemon phoenicelus Bottlebrush 5 gal. Cont. Raphiolepis indica Indian Hawthorne 5 gal. Cont. Nerium oleander Oleander 5 gal. Cont. Pittosporum tobira 'Var. ' Wheelers Dwarf 5 gal. Cont. Mockorange Nandina domestica Heavenly Bamboo 5 gal. Cont. Cont. Abelia grandiflora ' Sherwood' Sherwood Abelia 5 gal. Bougainvillea spectabilis Bougainvillea 5 gal. Cont. Carissa grandiflora Natal Plum 5 gal. Cont. Euryops pectinatus Golden Shrub Daisy 1 gal. Cont. Grevillea ' Pink Pearl' Greyillea 5 gal. Cont. Hibiscus rosa-sinensis Chinese Hibiscus 15 gal. Cont. Lantana montevidensis Weeping lantana 1 gal. Cont. Xylosma congestum ' Compacta' Xylosma 5 gal. Cont. Dodonaea viscosa ' Purpurea' Purple Hopseed Bush 5 gal. Cont. GROUND COVER Agapanthus africianus Dwf. Lily of the 1 gal. Cont. Nile Hedra helix ' Hahn' s ' Hahn' s Ivy Flats Liriope 1 gal. Cont. Liriope spicata Verbena Flats Verbena peruviana 1 gal. Cont._ Asparagus densiflorus ' Spr. ' Sprengeri Fern Flats Gazania rigens Gazania Cont. Fortnight Lily 1 gal. Dietes bicolor 1 gal. Cont. Rosmarinus officinalis Rosemary 1 gal. Cont. Trachelospermum jasminoides Star Jasmine 4"pots . 8" ctrs. Annuals TURF Hybrid Bermuda Seed/Sod (over seed with annual rye in winter) GENERAL IRRIGATION NOTES: -: < -- 1. ) The irrigation system shall be a permanent and fully automatic -- system. _ 2 . ) Turf areas and ground cover/shrub beds shall be irrigated on separate irrigation zones to provide watering of materials on- zones need basis : Irrigation techniques .._ shall be oriented - toward water conservancy as. much as possible. STENDELL KENNETH JAMES SINEATH WALLACE B STENDELL DEBRA LYNN 10651 MONACO CIR. P 0 BOX . 3352 PALM DESERT CA 92260 PALM DESERT CA 922.6] 625-0 0-032 425-020-027 i I CLARK BEVERLY A GOLDSTEIN DONALD B AA671 MONACO CIR GOLDSTFIN GLENDA PALM DESERT CA 92260 FRANKEL LEO 05-420-028 F.RANKEL REBECCA - 5977 SYCAMORE RIALTO , CA 92370 625-IJ2 33 i RICHARDSON DOUGLAS 14 STEVENS RICHARD B RICHARDSON SYLVIA G STEVENS VIRGINIA C 31] ' N 91RD . ST P _0 BOX 2!171 SANQ ANA CA `s%7QI ' CASPER WY 82602 625 L';j-0>9 62 5-1-12n-O VI i FRI ;CC JFFFLRY B SHERMAN ALEX FRI5;0 JOY(E F 1091 HILLHAVEN DR 60561 MONACO CIR � � SANTA ANA CA - 92701) - PALM DESERT. CA 92260 625-020-035 026-- 09-03f) MICHAUD WI. LL ,IAM J ANGLEMYFR DEWIN MICHAUiD MARIBETH A � � ANGLEHYFR DOROTHY P 0 BOX, 05in ].;_ . I SANDY HILL DR INCLINE VILLIAGE NV 891.150 WEST COVINA CA 91791 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO BIRD WILL.IAM J C S REENDERS ASST COMPTROLLER BIRD PATRICIA H P 0 BOX 800 ELFELT LAWRENCE D ROSEMEAD CA 92260 ELFELT THEDA 625-161-01.2 C/O LAWRENCE D .ELFELT 3555 NEW HAVEN PASADENA CA 911.07 625-1120-02? � I ARGYROS JOHN HACKER WFSLEY D ARGYROS DIONISIOS HACKER. KERRY V ARGYROS GEORGE 8714 PORTAFTNO PL 3205 CLAREM0RE ST 14HITTIER CA 906Q3 LONG BEACH CA 90809 625-420-02L1 625-161-014 i FUTTERMAN MORTON L JONES WILLTS C : 1UTTERMAN DIANE G JONES GERTRUDF L DAUER ALAN D JONES L.OUIE A DAUER MELINDA P- C/O LOUIE A JONES 5614 AR3ELA 901 E . MA.DISON ST e/HITTIER CA 92260 , WASHINGTON IA j2353 �� 1.12o-d19 625-420-n24 I P1ACOMBER ANN K BARLOW WAYNE E 11aY)Q MONROE ST 2949 CENTURY DARK E -7.1.00 INO10 CA q?? 1] OS ANGELES CA O0( '(' 6�'S- 42u-0.20 62 I LARSON ALBERT T SHUI_IIS THOMAS G LARSON . KSENTA SHULI- IS MARION M 1.17 E BAYFRONT 4116RT MONACO CTR BALBOA ISLAND CA - g266, PALM DESERT -CA 9226n 6,�5-420-021 62, _1.12o-n?6 SEiRFRT JACK C WEINSTEIN JOSEPH SEIBERT VIRGINIA A WEINSTEIN SELMA 3175 FLETCHER OR JOSEPH TR 6 SELMA TR WEINSTEIN ATHFRTON,CA 96025 607 S HILL ST STE 921 625-075-001 LOS ANGELES CA 90014 625-093-002 MAP,PUJO CHRIS H MARRUJO ADFLINE 43870 N JACKSON ST DATELAND MUTUAL WATER CO INDIO,CA 92201 C/O DEEP CANYON GROVE 525-075-002 74700 HIGHWAY 111 PALM DESERT CA 9226o 625-100-011 ORTFGA FRANK A ORTEGA SOLEDAD L DEEP CANYON GROVE 44655 DEEP CANYON RD 74700 HICH14AY 111 PALM DESERT,CA 922.60 PALM DESERT CA 92260 625-075-003 625-100-01-8 LOPEZ MARIO R LOPEZ DORA A DEEP CANYON GROVE 3636 CROOKED CREEK DR 74700 HIGHWAY 111 DIAMOND BAR, CA 91766 , PALM DESERT CA 9226o 625-075-oo4 625-100-028 GOUDSWAARD GERRIT J DEEP CANYON GROVE GOUDSWAARD CARLENE. H 74700 HIGHWAY 111 44755 DEEP CYN PALM DESERT CA 9226o PALM DESERT, CA 92260 625-100-030 625-075-005 GOUDSWAARD GERRIT J WEINSTEIN JOSEPH GOUDSWAARD CARLENE H WEINSTEIN SELMA 44755 DEEP CANYON RD . JOSEPH TR £, SELMA TR WEINSTEIN PALM DESERT, CA 92260 607 S HILL ST STE 921 625-075-oo6 LOS ANGELES, CA 9R014 615-093-003 WOODS BARRIE J TURNER ROGER. EBERT MAESCHEN STAN L TURNER MARY STANLEY 44775 DEEP CANYON RD . 1200 nUAIL NO 16o PALM DESERT, CA 9226o NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 625-075-007 625-093-005 n THOMAS ELLIS G KENNY MARION L THOMAS MARIE N 44835 DEEP CANYON RD 6911 LANGLEY CANYON RD PALM DESERT, CA 92260 SALINAS, CA 93907 625-093-oo6 625-093=001 WEINSTEIN JOSEPH PETTINGILL EDWIN B WEINSTEIN SELMA PETTINGELL DORIS JOSEPH TR 6 SELMA TR •WEINSTEIN 44805 DEEP CANYON RD 607 S HILL ST STE 921 PALM DESERT, CA 92260 LOS ANGELES, CA 90014 625-093-007 625-093-001 TURNER ROGER EBERT BASH JOHN M TURNER MARY SATNLEY BASH GLORIA 1200 QUAIL NO 160 45-466 GARDEN SnUARE NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 . PALM DESERT, CA 92260 615-093-004 615-095-003 .TIATEq ESTABLISHED IN 1918 AS A PUBLIC AGENCY �TST RICE COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT POST OFFICE BOX 1058•COACHELLA,CALIFORNIA 92236•TELEPHONE(619)398-2651 DIRECTORS OFFICERS 1 RAYMOND R.RUMMONDS,PRESIDENT THOMAS E.LEVY,GENERAL MANAGER-CHIEF ENGINEER TELLIS CODEKAS,VICE PRESIDENT BERNARDINE SUTTON,SECRETARY JOHN P.POWELL KEITH H.AINSWORTH,ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGERIAUDITOR PAUL W.NICHOLS REDMNE AND SHERRILL,ATTORNEYS THEODORE J.FISH October 13, 1986 0163.1 OCT 17 1986 Department of Environmental Services COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMEiJT City Of Palm Desert - CITY OF PALM DESERT 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, California 92260 i Gentlemen: Subject: Precise Plan 86-43, -Portion of Northeast Quarter of Section 21, Township 5 South, Range 6 East, San Bernardino Meridian This area is protected from stormwater flows by a system of channels and dikes, and may be considered safe from stormwater flows except in rare instances. This area is designated Zone B on Federal Flood Insurance rate maps which are in effect at this time. The District will furnish domestic water and sanitation service to this area in accordance with the current regulations of this ,District. , ,These�regulations provide for the payment of certain fees and charges by the subdivider and said fees and charges are subject to change. This area shall be'lannexed 'to ?Improvement District Nos. .54 and+80 of Coachella . Valley Water DistrictJfor'sanitation service. - There may be conflicts with existing District facilities. We request the appropriate public agency to withhold the issuance of a building permit until arrangements have been made with the District for the relocation of these facilities. "Yours ver truly,g� / Tom L y General Manager-Chief Engineer CS:gh cc: Don Park Riverside County Department of Public Health, Indio TRUE CONSERVATION USE WATER WISELY r sS. a � �� • i . 'ma's ', �� �rr.i �,. v` "'r��I �.1 • V� ,e...•' S �i ..e} ,r •Y r . y.�t. .r�� •a r'n.f '<" ,�-; .}�' :L M .,¢- ram ' l �� ■■" r t�+ Sal, • .`� ti. ` r-.���1/J/�'�rU� •:j ram r rr: �', �... t ♦ �" r"r ' IJ -. r.•. . r . • . � f ••� r y .' i 1• •(fir, w, - %; ,<, �\•''•�. nC � -r Y � �• N RI CHARD P, ;STEINKE �� '� P. 0, Box 1126 FEB 1 61988 YO RB A LI N DA, CA 92 686 M.AlAUNITY OuEtOPMEHI OEFARiWtff LITY OF MM DESERT FEBRUARY 12, 1988 STEPHEN R. SMITH, ASSOCIATE PLANNER CITY OF PALM DESERT 73-510 FRED WARING -DRIVE PALM DESERT, CA 92-260 RE RIVERSIDE COUNTY. PARCEL No , 625-100-006, AS IT RELATES TO y PALM DESERT PP 86-45, 168 UNIT RESIDENCE INN DEAR JMR , SMITH : AS YOU KNOW, .WE NOW HAVE TWICE REVIEWED THE TENTATIVE PLANS FOR THE PROPOSED 168 UNIT RESIDENCE INN AT THE N, E . CORNER OF HWY 111 AND DEEP CANYON, WE FIND THAT OUR PARCEL (WE ACQUIRED OWNERSHIP OF APN 625-100-006 ON FEBRUARY 2ND) IS USED IN ALL APPLICATIONS FOR USE, IN ALL LEGAL NOTICES, AND IN THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN AS PREPARED BY THE PROJECT ARCHITECT, DAVID L, HOFFMAN , PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT OUR PARCEL IS INCORRECTLY SIZED ( IT .IS TWENTY- FIVE FEET SQUARE) , AND INCORRECTLY PLACED IN THE PLANS WHICH YOU HAVE ON FILE , WE KNOW THAT THESE POINTS MAY BE MUTE, AS WE UNDERSTAND THAT THE PROJECT HAS BEEN SHELVED, BUT IF IT IS REVIVED, WE WISH ALL CONCERNED TO KNOW THAT CHANGES WILL BE REQUIRED, T KS FOR YOUR CO SIDERATIONS , T GARDS, DICK STEINKE . CC: THOMAS MILLER,' BROWN-MILLER DEV, CO, SANDY BAUM, SUNCASTLE REAL ESTATE 1 RESOLUTION NO. 87-15 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PRECISE PLAN OF DESIGN TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A GAS STATION AS PART OF THE RESIDENCE iNN PROJECT WITHIN 10 ACRES iN THE PC (4) S.P. AND PR-5 N, S.P. ZONE AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF HIGHWAY Ill AND DEEP CANYON ROAD. CASE NO. PP 86-45 Amendment 42 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 8th day of January, 1987, hold a duly noticed public hearing and continued public hearing on February., 26 to consider the request of THOMAS MILLER for the above described project; and WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedure for implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 80-89, " in that the director of community development has, determined that the project will not, have a significant environmental impact and a negative declaration i.s hereby certified; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of, all Interested persons desiring to be heard, said city council did find the following facts and reasons to exist to justify granting approval of said precise plan: 1 . The design of the precise plan will not substantially depreciate property values in the vicinity. 2. The precise plan will not unreasonably interfere with the use or enjoyment of property in the vicinity_ by the occupants thereof for lawful -purposes. 3. The precise plan will not endanger the public peace, health, safety . or general welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the .City of .Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1 . That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the commission in this. case;. 2. That approval of Precise Plan 86-45 Amendment #1 is hereby granted for reasons subject to the attached conditions. RESOLUTION NO. 87-I5 K i PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert City "Council , held on this 12th day of March, 1987, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: BENSON, CRITES, SNYDER, WILSON, AND KELLY NOES: NONE . ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE- RICRKRG S. KELLY, Mayor 7 ST: SHE ILA R. GIL AN, City rk CS/tm 2 4 ARESOLUTION NO. 87-15 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO. PP 86-45 Amendment #2 Department of Community Development: I . The development of the property shall conform substantially with exhibits on file with the department of community development/planning, as modified by the following conditions. 2. Construction of a ,portion of said project shall commence within one year from the date of final approval unless an extension of time is .granted; otherwise said approval shall become null , void and of no effect whatsoever. 3. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein . which are in addition to all municipal ordinances and state and federal statutes now in force, or which hereafter may in force. 4. Prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contemplated by this approval , the applicant shall first obtain permits .and/or clearance from the following agencies: Coachella Valley Water District Palm Desert Architectural Commission City Fire Marshal Public Works Department Palm Desert Water & Services District Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to the department of building and safety at the time of Issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. 5. The hotel shall provide solid-core or steel -doors equipped with dead bolt locks, door viewers and latch guards. 6. The addressing of the rooms should use even numbers to the left and odd numbers to the right to assist emergency vehicles in locating rooms. 7. Access to Highway III must be approved by Caltrans and City of Palm Desert Public Works department. 8. The requested assurances from the developer by the Hidden Palms Homeowners Association will become conditions of approval , and have been expressed as follows: 3 I RESOLUTION NO. 87-I5 a. That there be no usable balconies on the north side of their property facing toward Hidden Palms. b. A 90 foot setback from the building line to the Hidden Palms wall will be provided on the northern property line. C. That a minimum of two rows of existing date palms remain as a barrier between the Hidden Palms wall and the proposed parking area. d. That additional planting be done under the date palm barrier to a height capable of softening the effect of only seeing the palm tree trunks from Hidden Palms. e. That the be used at the gas station building, rather than metal . f. That no obtrusive lighting be done on the north side to, illuminate the hot- water building, parking area or planned amenities. g. That . the trash enclosure be moved from the northwest corner for noise and odor consideration. 9. Handicap parking stalls shall be distributed appropriately throughout entire site. 10. Detailed. parking lot and building .lighting plan shall be submitted to staff for approval , subject to applicable lighting standards,. pIan to be prepared by a qualified lighting engineer. II . Three to 3.5 foot mounding shall be provided to sufficiently screen parking lot areas .from streets. 12. Trash provisions shall be approved ,by applicable trash company and city prior to Issuance of building permit. 13. All roof-mounted mechanical equipment shall. be screened from all sides with materials similar to building walls. 14. Project shall be subject to art in public places fee per Ordinance No. 473. 15. A parcel map filing shall create parcels to the satisfaction of the director of community development. ' 16. The architecture of the future restaurant shall be compatible with the hotel . 17. All on-site utilities, Including cable television, shall be placed 4 RESOLUTION NO. 87-15 undergroundand shall be completely concealed from view except certain . appurtenances as may be approved 'by. the director of. community development. 18. Only delivery diesel trucks built after. 1974 shall be used. 19. All conditions of the architectural commission shall be met. 20. The precise plan will contain and 'provide all items delineated in the staff report dated December 16„ 1986. 21 . Decorative walls shall be compatible with adjacent developments. 22. The service station shall .be redesigned to be more compatible with the Residence inn to reflect 'the concerns identified by the staff report dated December 16, 1986. 23. The. date palms on the site .shall be maintained. in the event that a date palm dies or requires removal , 1t shall be replaced by a tree approved by city staff. Department of Public Works: 1 . Drainage and signalization fund fees, as required by city ordinance, shall be paid. prior to grading permit issuance. 2. Drainage facilities shall be provided, per Ordinance No. 218 and the Master Drainage Plan, to the specifications of the director of public works. 3. Storm drain construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study by the private engineer that is approved by the department of public works. 4. Pull public improvements, including traffic safety lighting, as required by ordinance and the director of public works, shall be Installed in accordance with city standards. 5. Complete improvement plans and 'specifications shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the city engineer for checking and approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. The engineer shall submit "as-built" plans prior to the acceptance of, the improvements by the city. 6. A.11 private driveways and parking lots shall be inspected by the engineering department and a standard inspection fee shall be paid prior to grading permit Issuance. 7. Landscaping maintenance. on Highway lit and Deep Canyon Road shall be provided by the property owner. 5 RESOLUTION NO. 87-15 8. Existing utilities on Highway III and . Deep Canyon Road shall, be undergrounded per each respective utility district's recommendation. Af• determined to be unfeasible applicant shall agree to participate in any future utility undergrounding. district: 9. Traffic safety striping on Highway 111 and Deep Canyon Road shall be . provided to the specifications of the director of public works. A traffic. control plan must be submitted to. and approved by the, di rector of public works before placing pavement markings'. 10. Complete grading plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the director of public works for checking and approval prior to issuance of any permits. 11 . Dedication of 55/58 feet of right-of-way on Highway 111 and Deep Canyon shall be done prior to issuance of any permits and approval of plans. 12. installation of curb and gutter, matching paving and 8 foot meandering sidewalk on Highway Ill and Deep Canyon Road. 13. offstte improvement plans to be approved by public works department and a surety posted to guarantee the required offstte improvements prior to grading permit issuance. 14. installation of one-half landscaped median in Highway Ill or cash payment for one-half the, cost of- landscaped median at the opt ion .of the director of public works.. 15: Traffic analysis to the prepared for the project to address the specific impacts on existing networks (street and intersections) and the proposed mitigation measures recommended for approval by the city. 16. Size, number and locatiom of driveways to public works specifications with only, three driveway approaches to be allowed to serve this property. 17. Complete parcel map shall be submitted as required by ordinance to the director of public works for checking and approval and be recorded before issuance of any permits. 18. Any and all .off-site improvements shall be preceded by the approval .of plans and the issuance of valid encroachment permit(s) by the department of public works. 19. A complete preliminary soils investigation, conducted by a registered soils engineer, shall be submitted to and approved by the department of public works prior to issuance of the grading permit. 6 RESOLUTiON .NO. 87-15 i 20. Access to Highway ill shall be restricted through raised medians, to right turn Ingress and egress and approved by Caltrans. 21 . A secondary access, 24 feet wide, shall be provided on Deep Canyon Road at the project's north boundary. 22. Applicant shall provide for bus turnout on Highway ill to the satisfaction of the director of public works and Sunline Transit Agency. 23. All improvements within the State right-of-way shall be constructed to Caltrans standards. 24. Median islands at both project entrances as shown on the project site plan . shall be continuous and extend into driveways far enough to preclude/minimize potential vehicle conflict. 25. If traffic conflicts develop, as determined by the director of public works, at the most southerly driveway on .Deep Canyon Road applicant shall modify drive to restrict movements to right turn ingress/egress only. 26. Access driveways . shall be a minimum of 24 feet for Highway III entry and Deep Canyon exit, and 18 feet for Highway III exit and Deep Canyon entry. 27. Existing signal at Deep Canyon and Highway, 111 shall be modified to the satisfaction of both Caltrans and the City of Palm Desert. City Fire Marshal : 1. install a water system capable of delivering 3000 GPM fire flow from any fire hydrant for a three hour duration in addition to domestic supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement. 2. install Riverside County super fire hydrants so that no point of any building is more than 200 feet from a fire hydrant measured, along approved vehicular travel ways. a. exterior surfaces of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow, and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. b. curbs shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. c. hydrants shall not be located closer than 25 feet to any building. 3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and two copies of the water system plan to the fire marshal for 7. y RESOLUTION NO. 87-15 review. Upon approval , one copy will be sent to the building department, and the original will be returned to the developer. 4. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and approved by the water company, with the following certification: "1 certify that the design of the water system 1n Case No. PP 86-45 Is In accordance with the requirements prescribed by the fire marshal ." 5. Prior to delivery of combustible materials to the building site, the required water system shall be installed, operating, and delivering the required flow. i 6. Additional fire protection requirements may be necessary when the j applicant submits specific plans .for con51deration .and approval . I 7. All building over 5000 square feet require an approved " fIre sprinkler system. B. All three story buildings must have a fire marshal approved fire alarm system. City Council Conditions: 1. There will be no car wash.on the gas station site. ,- 2. The Mobil Mart will be limited in the type of products sold to automotive products normally and customarily associated with the sale of gasoline, snack type foods and soft drinks as specified in Exhibit A. No alcoholic beverages will be sold. 3. Hours of operation will be limited to 6:00 a.m. to 11 :00 p.m. Monday through Sunday. 4. Building permits for. the gas station will not be issued until final inspection for the hotel foundation have occurred. The site may be graded as part of an overall grading .plan encompassing the entire site. 5. There will be no outside storage. 6. There will be no sales promotions of Items sold in the Mobil mart. 7. The exit located to the north on Deep Canyon Road shall be built with 'a crashgate,. designed to serve as a secondary access point should traffic and/or circulation problems arise at the southern egress. 8. The architectural design of the gas station will be reviewed for approval by city council . 8 ' • 1 SW64-E Rough Feasibility Analysis Actuals _ 1 Redlands Lana Linda Sun City PF <--- Pala Desert SF ---> - Total Value Average Unit Size 8,265,569 11,288,783 7,088,500 105,000 105,000 . - D of Lots 1,250 1,250 - 78 98 49 ^ . i COST f3 f �/ �S:T aurc Improvements/lot Fees/lot 11,895 22,177 20,321 16600 / lot 7.500 8.745 12,562 14,510 $ .{g.,-;Go / lot 1o,too f����C ��(2 T« (�y l �. �• - . School Fees - Incl Incl Incl / ' Construction/sq ft. 6.75/ sf 5,938 3,978 37.N 38.84 36.75 / of 45,938 C/./ Pf�(//(/f6 �f^✓l�(-�� �f�l Overhead/lot _ - 3,978 8,372 7,798 8,000 / lot B4O00 - / / ✓ -) Advertising (Z of Total Val) 1.13% 1.28% 1.08% - - 8 0.00% of Val 0 Models (% of Total Val) 2.71% 2.38% 2.85% 0.OOz of Val 0 Closing Costs (Z of Total Val) 4:09% 3.03% 2.36Z 0.00% of Val 0 Financing (% of Total Val) 5.57% 7.08% 5.74% - 5.75% of Val 6,038------------ Total Cast Less Land - 79,488 s�.C1 azs -15x Margin - - - 15,750 Residual Land Value oa LA ) Total Value 105,000 Less: 15% Margin ------------ Maximua Total Cost to Achieve 15% Margin 9,250 Less: Total Cost Less Land 8 - ( 9,250) - " / . ) Residual Land Value ------------ lot_. - - - ___________- ) Times 7 Units/Acre 68,338 / acre • RIVERSIDE COUNTY g1lIFORNI4 FIRE DEPARTMENT 01 e'p PRO FpRFSr °0F\PE ROTFCIIpM y t IN COOPERATION WITH THE s ' S COUNTY kg CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY ` - AND FIRE PROTECTION - p -z• RIVERSIDE::r..,a _ GLEN J.NEWMAN • c FIRE CHIEF RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE 210 WEST SAN JACINTO AVENUE COVE FIRE MARSHAL PERRIS,CALIFORNIA 92370 7 M AGE 1I1 TELEPHONE:(714)657-3183 RANCHOO MIRAGE,CA 92270 (619)346-1870 TO: &eV ar- PAIL 1>11e,1- REF: G46 Sey5A5 /6/ tPFsitr✓CZ >5V tAf&eF- ltt-/I DuocEX�- "5206 If circled, underlined or noted, condition applies to project O1 With respect to the conditions of approval regarding the above referenced plan check, the Fire Department recommends the following fire protection measures be provided in accordance with City Municipal Code, NFPA, UFC, and UBC and/or recognized Fire Protection Standards: The Fire Department is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commercial buildings per Uniform Fire Code Sec. 10. 301C. OZ A fire flow of 1500 gpm for a 1 hour duration at 20 psi residual operating pressure must be available before any combustible material is placed on the job site. 3O Provide, or show there exists a water system capable of providing a potential gallon per minute flow of 1500 for single family , 2500 for multifamily, and 3000 for commercial . The actual fire flow available from any one hydrant connected to any given water main shall be 1500 GPM for two hours duration at 20 PSI residual operating pressure. 4O The required fire flow shall be available from a Super hydrant(s) (611 x 411 x 2-1/211 x 2-1/211 ) , located not less than 25' nor more than 200' single family, 165' multifamily, and 1501. commercial from any portion of the building(s) as measured along approved vehicular travelways. Hydrants installed below 3000' elevation shall be . of the "wet barrel" type. O5 A combination of on-site and off-site Super fire hydrants (6"x4"x2- 1/2"x2-1/2" ) will be required, located not less than 25' or more than 200' single family, 165' multifamily, and 150' commercial from any portion of the building(s) as measured along approved vehicular travelways. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. pamedwmyrledpepe. 6O. Provide written certification from the appropriate water company having jurisdiction that hydrant(s) will be installed and will produce the required fire flow, or arrange field inspection by the Fire Department prior to request for final inspection. ® Prior to the application for a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and two copies of the water system plan to the County Fire Department for review. No building permit shall be issued until the water system plan has been approved by the County Fire Chief. Upon approval , the original will be returned. One copy will be sent to the responsible inspecting authority. Plans shall conform to fire hydrant types, location and spacing, and the system shall meet the fire flow requirements . Plans shall be signed by a Registered Civil Engineer and may be signed by the local water company with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Riverside County Fire Department. " "System has been designed to provide a minimum gallon per minute flow of 1500 , 2500, 3000. " OThe required fire flow may be adjusted at a later point in the permit process to reflect changes in design, construction type, area separations, or built-in fire protection measures such as a fully fire sprinklered building. Please be advised the proposed project may not be feasible since the existing water mains will not meet the required fire flows. Please check with the water company prior to obtaining an approval from the Planning or Building Department. 10 Comply with Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations, adopted January 1 , 1990 , for all occupancies. CW11mC Sze FAc-tLtr" 11 Install a complete fire sprinkler system per NFPA 13. The post indicator valve and fire department connection shall be located to the front, not less than 25' from the building and within 50' of an approved hydrant. This applies to all buildings with 5000 square feet or more building area as measured by the building footprint, including overhangs which are sprinklered per NFPA 13 . The building area of additional floors is added in for a cumulative total. Exempted are one and two family dwellings. G411LDGgQE 12 Install a . fire alarm (water flow) as required by the Uniform Building Code 3803 for sprinkler system. Install tamper alarms on all supply and control valves for sprinkler systems. l 13 Certain designated areas will be required to be maintained as fire lanes and shall be clearly marked by painting and/or signs approved by the Fire Marshal. Ci4ILVC.A9E 14 Install a fire alarm as required by the Uniform Building Code and/or Uniform Fire Code. Minimum requirement is UL central station monitoring of sprinkler system per NFPA 71 and 72 . Alarm plans are required for all UL central station monitored systems, systems where any interior devices are required or used. (U.F..C. 14-103(a) ) �5 Install portable fire extinguishers per NFPA., Pamphlet #10 , but not less than 2A10BC in rating. Fire extinguishers must not be over 75' walking distance. In addition to the above, a 40BC fire extinguisher is required for commercial kitchens . CNIZ�C.,L�Q�? 16 Install a Hood/Duct automatic fire extinguishing system if operating a commercial kitchen including, but not limited to, deep fryers, grills, charbroilers or other appliances which produce grease laden vapors or smoke. NFPA 96 , 17 , 17a. Install a dust collecting system as per the Uniform Building Code, Section 910a and Uniform Fire Code Section 76 . 102 , if conducting an operation that produces airborne particles. A carpenter or woodworking shop is considered one of several industrial processes requiring dust collection. 18 All buildings shall be accessible by an all-weather roadway extending to within 150' of all portions of the exterior walls of the first story. The roadway shall be not less than 24' of unobstructed width and 13 ' 6" of vertical clearance. Where parallel parking is allowed, the roadway shall be 36' wide with parking on both sides, 32' wide with parking on one side. Dead-end roads in excess of 150' shall be provided with a minimum 45' radius turn-around (55' in industrial developments) . Fountains or garden islands placed in the middle of these turn-arounds shall . not exceed a 5' radius or 10' diameter. City standards may be more restrictive. 19 The minimum width of interior driveways for multi-family or apartment complexes shall be: a. 24 feet wide when serving less than 100 units, no parallel parking, carports or garages allowed on one side only. b. 28 feet wide when serving between 100 and 300 units; carports or garages allowed on both sides, no parallel parking. c. 32 feet wide when serving over 300 units or when parallel parking is allowed on one side. d. 36 feet wide when parallel parking is allowed on both sides. 5f- Csp-cep 2�0 Whenever access into private property is controlled through use of gates, barriers, guard houses or similar means, provision shall be made to facilitate access by emergency vehicles in a manner approved by the Fire Department. All controlled access devices that are power operated shall have a radio-controlled over-ride system capable of opening the gate when activated by a special transmitter located in emergency vehicles. Devices shall be equipped with backup power facilities to operate in the event of power failure. All controlled access devices that are not power operated shall also be approved by the Fire Department. Minimum opening width shall be 16' with a minimum vertical clearance of 1316" . One "F" frequency transmitter shall be provided to Fire Marshal for each gate installed. 21 A dead end single access over 500' in length will require a secondary access, sprinklers or other mitigative measure approved by the Fire Marshal. Under no circumstances shall a single dead end access over 1300 feet be accepted. En^6R,6,F 10-1. Au_ss5 s"6u3vJ) Cei.(FlfZrn-}loTcJRPScGC({ 22 A second access is required. This can be accomplished by two main access points from main roadway or an emergency gated access into an adjoining development. c Ups Acvo�/� C.(�{La.ARE CL�3 Contact the Fire Department for a final inspection prior to occupancy. GN6LD�aR� 24. This project may require licensing and/or review by State agencies. Applicant should prepare a letter of intent detailing the proposed usage to facilitate case review. Contact should be made with the Office of the State Fire Marshal (818-960-6441) for an opinion and a classification of occupancy type. This information and a copy of the letter of intent should be submitted to the Fire Department so that proper requirements may be specified during the review process. Typically .this applies to educational , day care, institutional , health care, etc. 25. All new residences/dwellings are required to have illuminated residential addresses meeting both City and Fire Department approval. Shake shingle roofs are no longer permitted in the Cities of Indian Wells, Rancho Mirage or Palm Desert. l�6 Commercial buildings shall have illuminated addresses of a size approved by the city. 27 All fire sprinkler systems, fixed fire suppression systems and alarm plans must be submitted separately for approval prior to construction. Subcontractors should contact the Fire Marshal's office for submittal requirements. 28 Conditions subject to change with adoption of new codes, ordinances, laws, or when building permits are not obtained within twelve months. All questions regarding the meaning of these conditions should be referred to the Fire Department, Coves Fire Marshal , at Phone (619)346-1870 or the Fire Marshal's office at 70-801 Highway ill (Rancho Mirage Fire Station) , Rancho Mirage, CA 92270. OTHER: Tt TUJO E -JTC�N Ar MRI�( Ake ),J �GC�"C�t13LE. `io frlfZE EmJIP�^rlt=ply' 'TilRs� P�?,oty5 . I-�iA1.lE t..3li?-Cb�1S _LJ I I.L I SE6� l o C3� t,,%CR45A5m QLl OC-: lS (•.#isSrJS nR rr,AKIJk- TNErn L)RIVACBt_S.. . Sincerely, GLEN J. NEWMAN County Fire Chief by Cly Chittenden Coves Fire Marshal bbm l� V = o F Ld ira D •I ,,. 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE; PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 . TELEPHONE(619)346-06.11 REQUEST FOR OU44ESIM AND CDmlTIONS ,OF APPROVAL CASE NO(S): PROJECT: (�1 �r R2slPEr�T1+tL 17CVcLaPMGN� APPLICANT: STIS \W 6 p CZTN C RS Zhc. Enclosed please find materials describing a project for which the following is being requested: PLoV\-e✓' 0, U^� �t st�� lc 1.� CL4a-c Pr0 cot INcludth� rec�-eaEtuv 19�LciliE1'es a�ACL0 . C- LLU caves. -4,Zt(r�-VJJ. ©N a3 4cl^GS pvt, {one. fso��n sLcly-- of -t-7rrd- VVO-eln� Dr. I`foC • 2GiX� a-4" GBo1/L- '• f�'Pti7 � �c{^. 061- c)& I The attached data was prepared by the applicant and is being forwarded to you for comments and recommended conditions of approval. The city is interested in the probable impacts on the environment (including land, air, water, minerals, flora, fauna, noise, objects of historical or aesthetic significance) and recommended conditions of approval based on your expertise and area of concern. Your comments and recommended conditions of approval must be received by this office prior to 4:30 p.m. (�� . ;y l0 , to the attention of in order to be consi ered. Sincerely, ---------------------------------------- RAM0N A. DIAZ DIRECTOR OF COM,1UNITY DEVELOPMENT/pLANNIW. Attachment PLEASE RETURN MAP WITH CCUVISfTS ti . � C I�, tit nn ..�n_. 1nn/lff� � . .�: y • , , _ .. '- - s r �.. I .. �r , • � .♦ . ' ram. �. - o J I oV PEW fttzan 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA92260 TELEPHONE(619)346-0611' PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NOTICE OF ACTION Date: February 3, 1988 Suncastle Real Estate Mr. Sandy Batun P.O. Box 1739 Palm Desert, CA 92261 Re: PP 86-45 The Planning Commission of the City of"Palm .Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of February 2, 1988. CONTINUED TO MARCH 15, 1988. CARRIED 5-0. Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Community Development, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. RAMON A. DIAZ, SE or PALM DESERT PLANNiI�G SSION RAD/tm This space.IS unty Clerk's Filing Stamp PROOF OF PUBLwhTION ' (201S.S C.C.P.) STATE OF CALIFORNIA, County of Riverside am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to Proof of Publication of or interested in the above entitled matter. I �irY„Q,F„J'J�(M,p�$,ART............................ am the principal clerk of the printer of the DESERT POST Legal Not•ice•Case.NoJ'P•8G-.45............. .................................................... Pasle Clipping ...........:........................... ... <, CITY OF PALM DESERTi a newspaper of general circulation, printed i LEOAL NOTICE - CASE NO.PP 8645 Bi—weekly NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that A public hearing will be held be- 1 and published ......... ....................... tore the Palm Desert City Council to consider a request by THOMAS MILLER for RESIDENCE INN to construct a 168 unit Inn, F., a restaurant and a gas station on the northeast corner of Highwayw In the City of ...Pa11a.De or.C............ 111 and Deep Canyon Road,also described"as:APN 625w1100004,°.';' 16, County of Riverside, and which news. �3AID pu0blic hearing will be held Thursday,January 8, 1987 et;7 paper has been adjudged a newspaper c`':, 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber at the Palm Desert City Hatt, of general circulation by the Superior ill:`73-510 Fred Waring Drive,Palm Desert,California,at which time„;'F State of and place all interested persons are Invited to Attend and be heard.• r Court of the County of Riverside, It you challenge the proposed actions in court,you may be limlted't4 to raising only those Issues you or someone else raised at the pub-, ..; California,under the date ol• 10/5 19 64 , lic hearing described In this notice or In written correspondence x •.... F" delivered to the City Council(or planning commission)at,of prior l'I hearing. - 8 3 6 5 8 SHEILA R.GILLIGAN, i, to the public that t the notice, Clty Clark Case Number .............. .. �'' i of which the annexed Is a printed copy (set ,Cityof Palm Desert, .s •' 'S California In type not smaller than nonpareil), has (r (Pub.D.P.oea 2s,1986) ., "'; . S . • '''r been published in each regular and entire - Issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: ............1 zafi/.84.............:............... all in the year 19.11b.. I certify (or declare) under penalty of Rerjury that the foregoing . is true and correct. Dated at....?AIR.RMAF.r................... Calif rniatht�s6th dayof...Dec.1 ,986.. ;e; r� iWn- r;" wn Signature )FC re arrrlN N u M lhll blank form mcv Ncwr#d from: f `� I 01,986 pang F CALIFORNIA NEWSPAPER SERVICE a Dept BUREAU, INC. Legal Advertising Clearing House 120 west second St., Los Angeles,Calif. 90012 Telephone: (213) 625.2541 /IUN rNYUt of all MAL Proof 61 Ivkllulloe �hrnNbllh\Ih1Upm. pit,0r OF",PU 41CAfiaOW Yhts spate is far the Bounty Glerkrs Filing stamp -CEIVED STATE OF.CALIFORNIA '8fi OCT 2.9 An 9 15 County of Riverside CITY CLERKS. 0-FICE .CITY �OF� PALM. DESERT am a•citizen of the United States and a - resident of 1he'County aforesaid: 1 ant over the age dkeig'hleen years;and not a.party to Proof of-Publication of 'otinteeestedin.theabove-entilled matter. I CASE NO . PP 86-�4.5 am the principal clerk'ot. the printer of the .••••.•••••••-••......•:............... •••••••••• bESERT 40S2 .. .................................................... •••• ••- . •a - .. i •CITY OF PALM D2£EY4T'�'" - ti- LEGAL NOTICE- ........ F CASE'NO.PP 8845 - a newspaper of general circulation, Orbited, . NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a re- quest by THOMAS MILLER for RESIDENCE INN to constructs r of and published ...............::.................. unit Inn,a restaurant and a gas station on.the norm-east corner of Highway 111 and Deep Canyon Road,also described as: APN 625-106004,006,015.016.021,022 in,the-Cily of ...Pa,1z.J)esar•t............. 1 'SAID,pOlic hearing will be ABld'on Tuesday,November A.1986 at' County of Riverside.` and which news- 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber.at the Palm Desert City Hall„ er h been -adjudged a newspaper 73.510 Fred Waring Drive,Palm Desert,California,at which time. pap as and place all Interested persons are Invited to attend and be heard. of general: circulation by the Superior If you callenge the proposed actions in court,you may be limited to Court-Ob the. County OI :Riverside),State Of raising only those Issues you or someone else raised at the public •, hearing described in this notice, or.in written correspontlence delivered to the city council(or planning commissidn)al,or prior California•_under the date.of,10/S., 19 64, to,the public hearing. RAMON A.DIAZ,Secretary "8 3 65 g - Palm Desert Planning Commission Case Number ..8.3 . 8.....•; tha't,the notice; � � Y(Pub. D.P.Oct.24, 1986) of which the annexed.is a printed copy.(set -- l in type not 'smaller Shan nonparell),,,has been published in .each.regular and entire issue of said newspaper, and not. .in any supplement thereof on the following dates, t0-wit: all in the year 19.8-6.-. I. certify for de;ClareY.:Vnder ;:penalty. of Rerjury that .:the foregoing is true,.and.. corrette­ Dated at:'...?:eJktil.R1'.8:er F...........I......... California,lhis'. 24t,hday o1:..OnT;:, 19.86.. ��- gnat�re Q • P.C."copies Of lhi&4Un%farm mpr be"Cur"from$ CALIFORNIA NEWSPAPER SERVICE ' tSWREAUONC. Legal Advertising Clearing House 120 West Second St., Los Angeles, Calif. 90012 Telephone:, 1213) 625.2541 ._ Plsirs4r"wast OE MENA.LProof of PVl1flC4hw - .When o'Brim this form. (NEV @ d um 2&tan I, 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE(619)346-0611 PIANNIIX' OSE-ZUSSION MEEPING DX7PICE OF ACTION Date: March 29, 1989 Mr. Bob Foster Banner Associates 1900 North Amidon Suite 221 Wichita, KS 67204 Re: PP�B and PM 22285 The Planning Ccumission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of March 21, 1989. PLANNING OCTTIISSICfi APPROVED A ONE-YEAR TIME. EXTENSICN FOR PP 86-45 AND PM 22285 BY naym M7PICN. CARRIED 3-0. Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Ccnm unity Development, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. f)d RAM N A. DIAZ, SEC PALM DESERT PLANNING i4SSION RAD/tm cc: Coachella Valley Water District Public Works Department Building & Safety Department Fire Marshal I C HMV 0 IPMH l DCwrrf 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA92260 TELEPHONE(619)346-0611 PLANNING COMUSSION MEETING NOTICE OF ACTION Date: March 17, 1988 Mr. Sandy Baum Suncastle Real Estate . P.O. Box 1739 Palm Desert, CA 92261 Re: rPP 86-45 The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of March 15, 1988. APPROVED A ONE-YEAR TIME EXTENSION. CARRIED 3-0. Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Ccmmunity Development, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. RANp ^A. DIAZ, S-CRE7 T = PALM DESERT PLANNING SSION RAD/tm " cc: Coachella Valley Water District Public Works Department Building.& Safety Department Fire Marshal MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 15, 1988 i Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact and PP 88-2, subject to conditions as amended. Carried 3-0. VIII. MISCELLANEOUS A. Consent Calendar Continued Case No. PP 86 4 THOMAS MILLER, Applicant � Request for a one-year time extension for a project located at the northeast corner of . Highway 111 and Deep Canyon Road. Mr. Diaz explained why the time extension request had been continued and indicated that staff wanted to add a condition to allow the alignment of Deep Canyon and the hotel not be allowed to commence until the a restaurant foundation had been poured. Staff recarmended denial of the time extension if the conditions were not added. Mr. Sandy Baum, representative, felt that the close proximity of the Velvet Turtle, Cleves, and Johns would prohibit adding a condition. regarding the restaurant and did not see a problem with the alignment of Deep Canyon. Ms. Kandy Allen of the city attorney.'s office advised the commission that if escrow did not go through, the city would have nothing. After further discussion coninission felt that the project should placed back on the consent calendar and approved without adding any conditions. Staff explained that the approval would only require a minute motion action. Action: Moved by Vice Chairman Richards, seconded by Commissioner Downs, granting the one-year time extension. Carried 3-0. B. Discussion on the North Sphere Specific Plan and. Draft Environmental mortal Impact Report - CITY OF .PALM DESERT, Applicant Request for consideration -of the North Sphere . Specific Plan and Draft Envirorunental Impact Report for the area generally located south of Interstate 10, west of Washington Street, north 5 i � V 0 NOTICE OF DETERMINATION NOV 10 1987 Negative Declaration . ppMMUNITI' DEYELUPMENi DEPARTMENT CITY Df PALM DESERT TO: (X) Clerk of the Board of Supervisors ( ) Secretary for Resources County of Riverside 1416 Ninth St. , Rm 1311 4080 Lemon Street Sacramento, CA 95814 Riverside, CA 92502 FROM: CITY OF PALM DESERT 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 SUBJECT: ,Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108 or 21152 of the Public Resources Code. Project Title/Common Name: Residence Inn/Mobil Gas, PP �86-45 Date of Project Approval : February 26, 19B7 State Clearinghouse Number ( if submitted) : N/A Contact Person: Catherine Sass Pro.iect Location: Northeast corner of Highway 111 and Deep Canyon Road. Project Description: Ten acre hotel , restaurant and gas station. This is to advise. that .the City of Palm Desert has made the following determinations regarding the above described project: I . The project ( ) will , (X) will not, have a significant effect on the environment. 2. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared In connection with this . project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. X A Negative Declaration was. prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. A copy of the Negative Declaration may be examined at the above city hall address. 3. Mitigation -measures (X) were, ( ) were not, made a condition of the approval of the project. 4. A statement of Overriding Considerations ( ) was, (X) was not, adopted for this project. �. BOARD Wl SUPERVISORS Signature Title Pv0V 0�91987 Date Received for Filing GERALr CLERK o!the BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, Please return date-stamped copy in the enclosed envelope. w caUrt"o'R.msiee'State or Ca?Irma C G INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM City of Palm Desert TO: CITY MANAGER AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT/PLANNING DATE: MARCH 12, 1987 III SUBJECT: RESOLUTION FOR PP 86-45 APPLICANT: Thomas Miller Sandy Baum ' 11753 San V.incente P.O. Box 1739 Los Angeles, CA 90049 Palm Desert, CA 92261 Attached is a copy of the resolution council requested with the "amended conditions to allow construction of' a gas station as part of the Residence . lnn project at the northeast corner of Highway III and Deep Canyon .Road. Staff recommends adoption of the resolution. RA A 1 DIRECTOR, OF. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT/PLANNING RAD/tm CITY COUNCIL�TION: ' APPROVED DENIED RECEIVED OTHER MEETI.iVG DATE_ WOES: �_ - ---`— -- -- ASSTAT.N VERrFI'E' Y: Original on Fil i1='s ,City Clerk' s U fic c RESOLUTION NO. � - . A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PRECISE PLAN OF DESIGN TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A GAS STATION AS PART OF THE RESIDENCE INN PROJECT WITHIN 10 ACRES IN THE PC (4) S.P. AND PR-5 N, S.P. ZONE AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF HIGHWAY Ill AND DEEP, CANYON ROAD: CASE NO. PP 86-45 Amendment #2 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 8th day of January, 1987, hold a duly noticed public hearing and continued public hearing on February 26 to consider the request of THOMAS MILLER for the above described project; and WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedure for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act , Resolution No. 80-89, " in that the director of community development has determined that the project will not have a significant environmental impact and a negative declaration is hereby certified; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said city council did find the following facts .and reasons to exist to justify granting approval of said precise plan: 1 . The design of the precise plan will not substantially, depreciate property values in the vicinity. 2. The precise plan will not unreasonably interfere with the use or enjoyment of property in the vicinity by the occupants thereof for lawful purposes. 3. The precise plan will not endanger the public peace, health, safety or general welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1 . That the above recitations are true and, correct and . constitute the findings of the commission in this case; 2. :. That approval of Precise Plan 86-45 Amendment #1 is hereby granted for reasons subject to the attached conditions. I RESOLUTION NO. � PASSED, APPROVED .and ADOPTED at a regular me ting of the Palm Desert Planning, Commission, held 'on this day of. ? P 1987, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: ?c lzcJl ( LP/t (�h NOES: l' , ABSENT: c�� ABSTAIN: RICHARD S. KELLY, Mayor ATTEST: SHEILA R. GILLIGAN, City Clerk . CS/tm 2 RESOLUTION NO. a . CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO. PP 86-45 Amendment #2 . Department of Community Development: I : The development of the property. shall conform substantially with exhibits on file with the department of community development/planning, as modified by the following conditions. 2. Construction of a portion of said project shall commence within one year from the date of final approval unless an extension of time is granted; otherwise .said approval shall become null , 'void and of no .effect whatsoever. 3. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations- set forth herein which are in addition to all municipal ordinances and state and federal statutes now in force, or which hereafter may be in force. 4. Prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contemplated by this approval , the applicant shall first obtain permits and/or clearance from the following agencies: Coachella Valley Water District Palm Desert Architectural Commission City Fire Marshal Public Works Department Palm Desert Water & Services District Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to the department of building and safety at the time of issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith.' 5. The hotel shall provide solid-core or steel doors equipped with dead bolt locks, door viewers and latch guards. 6. The addressing of the rooms should use even numbers to the left and odd numbers to the right to assist emergency vehicles in locating rooms. 7. Access to Highway III must be. approved by Caltrans and City of Palm Desert Public Works department. 8. The requested assurances from the developer by the Hidden Palms Homeowners. Association will become conditions of approval , and have been expressed as follows: 3 RESOLUTION N0. �.. a. That .there be no usable balconies on the north side of their property facing toward Hidden Palms. b. A 90 .foot setback from the building line to the Hidden Palms wall will be provided on the northern property line. , [ , C. that a minimum of two rows of existing date palms remain as a barrier between the Hidden Palms wall and the proposed parking area. d. That additional planting be done under :the date palm barrier to a height capable of softening the effect of only seeing the'palm tree trunks from Hidden Palms. e. That tamer the -"' be used at the gas 'station building, rather than metal . f. That no obtrusive lighting be done on the north side to illuminate the hot water building, parking area or planned amenities g. That the trash enclosure be moved from the .northwest corner for noise and odor consideration. 9. Handicap parking stalls shall be distributed appropriately throughout entire site. 10. Detailed parking lot and building . lighting plan shall be submitted to staff for approval , subject to applicable lighting standards, plan to be prepared by a qualified lighting engineer. 11 . Three to 3 . 5. foot mounding shall be provided to sufficiently screen parking lot areas from streets. 12. Trash provisions shall be approved by applicable trash company and city prior to issuance of building permit. 13. All roof-mounted mechanical equipment shall be - screened from all sides with materials similar to building walls. 14. Project shall be 'subject to art in public places fee per Ordinance. No. 473. 15. A parcel map filing shall create parcels to the satisfaction of the director of community development. 16. The architecture of the future restaurant shall be compatible with .the hotel . 4 RESOLUTION N0. � . . U 1 - 17. All on-site utilities , including cable television, shall be placed underground and shall .be completely concealed from view except certain appurtenances as may be approved by the director .of community development. 18. Only del .ivery' diesel trucks built after 1974 shall be used. 19. All conditions of the architectural commission shall be met. 20. • The precise plan will contain and provide all items delineated in the staff report dated December 16,, 1986. 21 .. Decorative walls shall be compatible with adjacent developments., 22. The service. station shall be redesigned to be more compatible with the Residence Inn to reflect the concerns identified by the staff report dated December 16, 1986. 23. . The date palms on the site shall be maintained. In the event that a date palm dies or requires removal , it shall be replaced by a- tree approved by city staff. Department of Public Works: 1 . Drainage and signalization fund fees, as required by city ordinance, shall be paid prior to grading permit issuance. 2. Drainage facilities shall be provided, per Ordinance No. 218 and the Master Drainage Plan, to the specifications, of the director of public works. 3. Storm drain construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study by the private engineer that is approved by the department of public works: 4. FuII pub IIc improvements, including traffic safety lighting, as .required by ordinance, and the director of public works, .shall be installed in accordance with city- standards. , 5. Complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required :by ordinance, to the city engineer for checking and approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. The engineer shall submit "as-built" plans prior to the acceptance of the improvements by.the city. 6. All private driveways and parking lots shall be inspected by the engineering department and a standard inspection fee shall be paid prior to grading permit issuance. 5 RESOLUTION NO. j 7. Landscaping maintenance on Highway Ill and. Deep Canyon Road shall be i provided by the property owner. 8. Existing utilities on Highway III and Deep Canyon Road. shall be if undergrounded per each respective utility district's recommendation. if determined to be unfeasible applicant shall agree to participate in any future utility undergrounding district. 9. Traffic safety striping on Highway III and Deep Canyon Road shall be provided to the specifications of the director of public works. A traffic control plan must be submitted to and approved by the director of public 1 works before placing pavement markings. 10. Complete grading plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the director of public works for checking and approval prior to issuance of any permits. 11 . Dedication of 55/58 feet of right-of-way on Highway - III and Deep Canyon shall be done prior to issuance of any permits and approval of plans. 12. .Installation of curb and gutter, matching paving and 8 foot meandering sidewalk on Highway III and Deep Canyon Road. 13. Offsite improvement plans to be approved by public works department and a, surety posted to guarantee .the required offsite improvements prior to grading permit issuance. 14. Installation of one-half landscaped median in Highway III or cash payment for one-half the cost of landscaped median at the option of the director of public works. 15. Traffic analysis to the prepared for the . project to address the specific impacts on existing networks (street and intersections) and the proposed mitigation measures recommended for approval by the city. 16. Size, number and location of driveways to public „works specifications with only three driveway approaches to be allowed to serve this property. 17. Complete parcel map shall be submitted as. required. by ordinance to the director of public works for checking and approval and .be recorded before issuance of any .permits. 18. Any and all off-site improvements shall be preceded by -the approval of plans and the issuance of valid encroachment permitis) by the department of public works.. 19. A complete preliminary soils investigation, conducted by a registered. 6 , n � , RESOLUTION NO. soils engineer, shall be submitted to and approved by the department of Public works prior to issuance of the grading permit. 20. Access to - Highway III shall be restricted through raised medians, to . right turn ingress and egress and approved by Caltrans. 21 . A secondary access, 24 feet wide, shall be provided on, Deep Canyon Road at the project's north boundary. 22. Applicant shall provide for bus turnout on Highway III to the satisfaction of the director of public works and Sunline Transit Agency. I .23. All improvements within the State right-of-way shall be constructed to j Caltrans standards. 24. Median . islands at both project entrances as shown on the project site plan shall be continuous and extend into driveways far enough to preclude/minimize potential vehicle conflict. . 25. If traffic conflicts develop, as determined by the director of public works, at the most southerly driveway on Deep Canyon Road applicant shall modify drive to restrict movements to right turn ingress/egress only. 26. Access driveways shall be a minimum of 24 feet for Highway III entry and Deep Canyon exit, and 18 feet for Highway Ill exit and Deep Canyon entry. 27. Existing signal at Deep Canyon and Highway III shall be modified to the satisfaction of both Caltrans and the City of Palm Desert. City Fire Marshal : 1 . Install a water system capable of delivering 3000 GPM fire ,flow from any fire hydrant for a three hour , duration in addition to domestic supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply .main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement. 2. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants so' that no point of any building is more than 200 feet from a fire hydrant measured along approved vehicular travel ways. a. exterior surfaces of hydrant barrels and heads .shall be painted chrome yellow, and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. b. curbs shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. C. hydrants shall not be located closer than 25 feet to any building. 7 RESOLUTION NO. 3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and two copies of the water system plan to the fire marshal for { review. . Upon. approval , one copy will be sent to the building department, I and the original will be returned to the developer. i 4. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and approved by the water company, with the following certification: "I certify .that the design of the water system in Case No. PP 86-45 is in I accordance with the requirements prescribed by the fire marshal ." 5. Prior to delivery of combustible materials to the building site, . the required water system shall be installed, operating, and delivering the required flow. 6. Additional fire protection requirements may be necessary when the applicant submits specific plans for consideration and approval . 7. All building over. 5000 square feet require an approved fire sprinkler system. 8. ' All three story .buildings must have a fire marshal approved fire alarm system. . City Council Conditions: I .' There will be no car wash on the gas station site. 2. The Mobil Mart will be limited in the type of products sold to automotive products normall.y and customarily 'associated with the sale of gasoline, snack type foods and soft drinks as specified in Exhibit A. No alcoholic beverages will be sold. 3. Hours of operation will be limited to 6:00 a.m. to I1 :00 p.m. Monday through Sunday. ( omaaAo,1 4. Building permits for th gas station will not be issued until final inspection for the hotel have occurred. The site may be graded as part of an overall grading plan encompassing the entire site. 5. .There will . be no outside storage. 6. There will be no sales promotions of items sold in the Mobil mart. 7. The exit located to the north on Deep Canyon Road shall be built with a crashgate, designed to serve as a secondary access point should traffic and/or circulation problems arise at the southern egress. 8 RESOLUTION NO. � 8. The architectural design of the gas station will be reviewed for approval by city council . 9 Mobil Oil Corporation EXH1131T A February 18, 1987 = ; i . Ramon A. Diaz Director of Community Development City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Pa1m ,Desert, CA 92260 RE: PP-86-45 MOBIL STATION , DEEP CANYON & 111 PALM DESERT Dear Mr. Diaz: In the City Council Meeting of February 12, 1987, the members of the Council raised 3 major concerns; (1) the car wash, (2) hours of operation, and (3) items to be sold in the Mobil Mart. In reference to item one, Mobil would be willing to withdraw its application for the car wash if that would help the approval of the project. Mobil originally proposed a 24-hour operation to best serve the community, The Residence. Inn and the late night motoring public. Due to the Council's concerns, I would be willing to propose to Mobil Management that the station be operated 6 to 12. While I can appreciate concerns one might have against operation to midnight, I believe the community will find our operation no more objectionable than the Residence Inn, who has agreed to locate next to us. The extensive landscaping and modern efficient down lighting will prevent any light spillage off of our site, and, of course, we will not have any automotive repair work, just gasoline and snack sales. Since the operation is computer controlled, no bells or noise will be generated from the site. In my opinion, the residents on Deep Canyon, the closest being over 300 feet away, will not be adversely impacted by the station. In fact, the station will be shielded from view by most homes due to The Residence Inn. The operation of the Mobil Mart will be restricted to items like: (1) .Soft drink (10) Hostess & Frito Lay type .(2) Chips .and Nuts products . (3) Jucie (11) Ice Cream - -individual (4) Milk (less than quart sizes, pints or smaller. size) (12) Coffee (prepared) (5) Prepared Sandwiches (13) Health & Beauty Aids (Already made) like aspirin or toothpaste. (6) Film & Batteries (14) Automotive, supplies like oil (7) Cigarettes & Lighters and maintenance items. (8) Chewing Gum (15) Small bags of ice. (9) Candy & Mints (16) Prepackaged. cookies & crackers. 1 i. a Items we will not sell: (1) Beer S Wine i (2) Canned goods such as vegatable or fruits (3) Sandwiches which are prepared on site - like Arco's i hamburgers. (4) No fresh produce - lettuce or similar (5) No meats - other than Jerky-type snacks The Council was also concerned about the items stacked outside on the porch. I would be willing to have .a restriction against outdoor displays. i As one can see, the items we wish to sell are not the type of food one would make a trip to the "Mobil station" for, however, the Residence Inn with their full individual kitchens might find it convenient to buy some of the .items. This, of course, would reduce the guests' need to drive to a market. Mobil is very desirous of building a facility that we and the City can be proud of.. As you know, we have worked many .long and hard hours .with the City on station layout, landscaping, architecture and believe Mobil will be an asset to Deep Canyon and Highway Ill and the community. Sincerely, J. H. Huntsberry Senior Real Estate Representative . 0677P/mlt % PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1,194 A RFSOLUTIUPI Of- THE PLANldllu; C()MMI`,Sl()N OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERI- , C:ALIFOPNIA, APPPLIVING A _ PRECISE PLAN OF DESIGN TO A.LLnW CONSIRLIC.110N OF A 168 LINII INN AND A. FULL SF_RVICE RE5TAIIRANT: AND GAS STATION WITHIN A 10 AC:PES IN THE PC (4) S.P. AND PR-5 N; S.P. ZONE AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER Of HIGHWAY III AND DEEP CANYON ROM). CASE NO. PP 86-45 WHEREAS,. the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on t1be . 4th day of November, 1986, held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the request of THOMAS MILLER for the ahove described project; and WHEREAS, said application has rnmpli^d with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedure for .Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act , Resolution No. 80--13q. " in that the director of rommunity development has determined that the projrc_t will nol- have a significant environmental impact and a negative derleratior) is herehy certified; and WHEREAS, at said Public hearing. upon hearing and , considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said planning commission did Find the following facts and reasons to exist to justify granting approval of said .precise plan: 1 . The design of the precise plan will not sub-tantially deprer_i.ate property values in the vicinity. Z The precise plan will not unrn.3gonahly int-grfere with the use or enjoyment of proF>erty in the vicinity Ly the occupants thereof for lawful purposes. 3. The precise plan will not end.ana!=f I-he puhl''Ic peace, health, safety or general welfare. NOW, THEREFOPF, BE IT RESOLVED by I-he Planning- (,omrn I ss I on of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: I . That the above recitations are true and correct and constit-ut-e the findings of the rnmmission in thi ra,e; Z. That approval of Precise Plan ga _d5 i; hrreliy granted for reasons - a+cached cond1tInnF l�y�O 7 I - PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1194 PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a rernilar meeting of the. Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this l6tl day of, Decemher, 1986, by the following vote, to wit: - AYES: DOWNS, RIC,HARDS, WHITLOCK, AND ERWCIOD NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE RICHARD EPWOOD, Chairman ATTEST: 4 Y ' RAMON A. DIAZ, Secreta /tm Z t ' PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1194 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL i CASE NO. PP 86-45 Department of Community Development: 1 . The development of the property shall reinfnrm ,uhstant !ally with exhibits on file with the department of community development/planning, as modified by the fol.lowing conditions. 2. Construction of a portion of said project shall commence within one year from the date of final approval unless an extension of time is granted; otherwise said approval shall become mill , void and of no effect whatsoever. 3. The development of the property dagrribed herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein which are in, addition to all municipal ordinances and state and federal statutes now in force, or- which hereafter may be in force. 4. Prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contemplated by this approval , the applicant shall first obtain permits and/or clearance from the following agencies: Coachella Valley Water District Palm Desert Architectural Commission City Fire Marshal Public_ Works Department Palm Desert Water & Services District Evidence of said permit or clearance from the shove agencies shall he presented to the department, of buiIriina and safety at the time of issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith.. - 5. The hotel shall provide solid-core ni- steel doors equipped with dead bolt locks, door viewers and latch guards. 6. The addressing of the rooms should use even numbers to the left and odd numbers to the right to assist emergency vehicles in locating rooms. 7. Access to Highway III must be approved . hy f.altrans .and City of Palm Desert Public Works department, B. The requested assurances from the developer by the Hidden Palms Homeowners Association will become conditions of approval , arid have been expressed as follows: 3 i PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1194 a. That there be no usable balconies, on the north side of their property facing toward Hidden Palms. h. A 90 font setback from the bi_ii Iding I ine to _the.- Hidden Palms wal l- will be provided on the 'northern prnperty line• . r_• That a minimum of twn 'row; of exidtinq date palms remain as a barrier between the Hidden Palms wall and the proposed parking area. d. That additional planting he none under I,"he. cute palm barrier to a height capable of softening the effect of only seeing the palm tree trunks from Hidden Palms. e. That they prefer the to be used .at the aas station building, rather than metal . f. That no obtrusive lighting be done on the north side to illuminate the hot water building, parking area or planned amenities. g. That the trash enclosure he mnved from the. northwest corner for noise and odor consideration. 9. Handicap parking stalls shall. he distributed appropriately throughout entire site. 10. Detailed parking lot and building lighting plan shall be submitted to staff for approval , subject to applir .-lile lighting standards, plan to he prepared by a qualifiers lighting engineer. - II . Three to 3 . 5 foot mounding shall h^ provided to sufficiently screen parking lot areas from streets. 12. It-ash provisions, shall be. approvers by arp 1 i rah I e ,trash company and city prior to .issuance of building permit . 13. All roof-mnunted mechanical equipment shall be = eened from all sides with materials similar to building 0aIIs. 14. Project shal l be subject to art in puhl is places fee per Ordinance No. 473. 15. A parcel map filing shal'I rre.3te parrtals to the satisfaction of the director of community development. 16. The architecture of the future restaurant shall he compatible with the hotel . A 'PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1194 17. All on-site utilities , including cable television, shall he placed underground and shall be completely concealed from view except certain appurtenances as may be approved by the director of communi.ty4development. 18. Only delivery diesel trucks built after 1974 shall he used. 19. All conditions of the architectural commission shall he meta 20. The precise plan will contain and provide all items ' delineated in the staff report dated December 16, 1986. 21 . Decorative walls shall be compatible with adjacent. developments. 22. Car wash may be operated only between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. 231 The car wash shall also be built so that the door on the north end of the building shall be closed while the car wash is in operation. 24. The service station 'shal I be redesiqned to be. m6ra_ compatible with the Residence Inn to reflect the concerns identified by. the staff report dated December 16, 1986. 25. The date palms on the site shall he maintained. In the event that a date palm dies or requires removal , it shall be replaced by a tree approved .by city staff. Department of Public Works: I . Drainage and signalization fund fees, no required by city ordinance, shall be paid prior to grading permit issuance. 2. Drainage facilities shall be provided, per Ordinance No. 218' and the Master Drainage Plan, to the specifications of the director of public works. 3. Storm drain construction shall be contingent Ripon 'a drainage study. by the private engineer that is approvers by the department of public works. 4. Full public improvements, Including traffic safety lighting, as required by ordinance and the director of public works, shall be installed in . accordance with city standards. 5. Complete improvement plans and 'specifications shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the city engineer for checking and approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. The engineer shall submit "as-built" plans prior to the acceptance of the improvements by the city. i PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1194 6. All private driveways and parking Inks shall ! be inspected by the engineering department and a standard In=..pectIon fee shall be paid prior to grading permit issuance. 7. Landscaping maintenance nn Highway III and Deep Canyon Road shall be provided by the property owner. 8. Existing utilities on Highway III and Deep Canyon .Road _ shaII be undergrounded per each respective utility district's recommendation. If determined to be unfeasible applicant: -,Ball agree to participate in any future utility under ground Ing district. 9. Traffic safety striping on Highway III and Deep �C'anyon Road shall be provided to the spec I f I cat I ons of tfie director of F.iijhIIc w<rIks. A traffic Control plan must be suhmItted to and approved by the ddrec_tor, of' public_ works before placing pavement markings. 10. Complete grading plans- and specifications shall he submitted, as required by ordinance, to the director of pubiir_ works fnr checking and approval prior to issuance of any permits. 11 . ' Dedication of 55/58 feet of right-of-wav on Highway III and Deep Canyon shall be done prior to issuance of any permits and approval hf plans, . 12, 1nstaIIat1on of curb and gutter , matching pavinq_ and 8 foot meandering sidewalk on Highway III and Deep Canyon Road. 13. Offsite improvement plans to be approved by puhlic work; department and a surety posted to guarantee the required offsite improvements prior to grading permit issuance. 14. Installation of one-half landscaped median in Highwav III or cash payment for one-half the cost of . landscaped median at thrl option of the director of public works. 15. Traffic analysis to the prepared for the project to address the specific impacts on existing networks (street and intersections) •-arid the proposed mitigation measures recommended for approval by the city, 16. Size, number and location of driveways to public works specifications with only three driveway approaches to be allowed to serve this property, 17. Complete parcel map shall be submitted as required by ordinance to the director of public works for chocking and approval and be. recorded before issuance of any permits. 18. Any and all off-site improvements shall lie preceded by the approval of 6 i . -PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1194 i i plans and the issuance of valid encroachment permit(s) by the department of public works. 19. A complete preliminary soils investigation, conducted by a registered soils engineer, shall be submitted to and apnroved . by the department of public works prior to issuance of the grading permit'. 20. Access to Highway III shall he restricted through raised medians, to right turn ingress and egress and approved by Caltrans. 21 . A secondary access. 24 feet wide, shall be provided on Deep Canyon Road at the project's north boundary. 22. Applicant shall provide for bus turnout on Highway III to the satisfaction of the director of publir works and Sunline Transit Agency, 23. All improvements within the State right-of-wav shall be constructed to Caltrans standards. 24. Median islands at both project entrances as shown on the project site plan shall be continuous and extend into driveways far enough to preclude/minimize potential vehicle conflict . 25. If traffic conflicts develop, as determined by the director of public works, at the most southerly driveway on Deep f_?nyon Road applicant shalI modify drive to restrict movements to right turn ingress/egress only. 26. Access driveways shall be a minimum of 2.4 feet for Highway III entry and Deep Canyon exit, and IR feet for Flighway III exit and Deep Canyon entry. 27. Existing signal at Deep Canyon and Highway 111 shall be modified to the satisfaction of both Caltrans and the City of Palm Desert. City Fire Marshal : I . Install a water system capable of delivering 3000 GPM fire flow from any fire hydrant for a three hour duration in addition to domestic supply. The computation shall he based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement. .2. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants so that no point of any building is more than 200. feet from a fire hydrant measured along approved vehicular travel ways. a. exterior surfaces of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow, and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green.. 7 i I PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0. 1194 b. curbs shall be painted red 15 Peet in either direction from each hydrant. C. hydrants shall not be located rin;rr. Vhan feet teary building. 3. Prior to issuance of a huilding permit , the developer shall furnish the original and two copies of the water system plan to the ,fire marshal for review. Upon approval , one copy will he sent to the building department, and the original will be returned to the developer . 4, The water system plan shall he signed by a registered .civil engineer and approved by the water company, with the . followirio certification: "I certify that the design of the water syc'tern in rase Nn. PP 86-45 is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the fire marshal ." 5. Prior to delivery of comhustihle materials to . the building site, the required water system shall be installed, operating, and delivering the required flow. 5. Additional fire protection requirements may he necessary when the applicant submits specific plans for consideration and approval . 7. All building over . 5000 square_ feet require an approved fire sprinkler system. 8. All three story buildings must have a fire marshal ,approved fire alarm system. f 1 I I I I II i r r.- Z 1 r G� o -----. .i �T ! 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE(619)346-0611 January 30, 1989 Mr. Sandy Baum, Broker Suncastle Real Estate 73-241 Highway 111 , Suite 3E P.O. Box 1739 Palm Desert, CA 92261 Dear Mr. Baum On March 15, 1988 a one-year time extension was granted for Precise Plan 86-45. This extension will expire on March 15, 1989 unless the following actions are taken: 1 . A formal request for another one-year time extension is received, processed by this office, and approved by the planning commission prior to that date. . 2. Working drawings are submitted to the building department for plan check. A project is considered in progress while under the permitting stage. I hope this information has answered your inquiry. Sincerely, Catherine Sass Associate Planner /tm MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING CCH41SSION FEBRUARY 2, 1988 VI. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Case No. PP 86-45 - THOMAS MILLER, Applicant Request for a one year time extension for a project located at the northeast corner of Highway 111 and Deep Canyon Road. Mr. Diaz explained that staff would like to condition the extension to include a reimbursement agreement for funds the city will expend on the Deep Canyon/Highway 111 realignment and acquire the right-of-way. He noted that this was a condition of approval to contribute funds when the project develops, but indicated that the city wishes to proceed on the realignment. MR. SANDY BAUM, 45-800 Deep Canyon, addressed the commission and explained that financing had fallen through and they were in the process of getting financing that should go through on April 15. He also indicated that the property was still in escrow and it might be difficult to obtain the present owner's agreement. Mr. Diaz stated that the precise plan approval runs with the land and recamiended that this matter be continued to March 15 and the applicant will know if he has the property and at that time the canaission can decide whether or not to approve the time extension. Action: Moved by Commissioner Downs, seconded by Clomaissioner Richards, continuing PP 86-45 to March 15, 1988. Carried 5-0. VII. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Case No. Tr 23148 - SHAM INC., Applicant Request for approval of a 15 lot residential subdivision located on the west side of Edgehill Drive south of Pitahaya. Mr. Joy outlined the salient points of the staff report. He indicated that a letter was received by Mr. George Fox requesting that approval be withheld until water rights have been acquired from Lowell Wooden. Staff reconTended approval of the project. Commissioner Richards expressed concern regarding single family homes backing onto the channel and the channel's ability to withstand 2 i r� JAN 1 1988 January 12 , 1988 CDMMUNICI(YDEVEPO MDESDE7AHIMEM Ray Diaz, Director, Community Affairs , City of Palm Desert, 73510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert , California 92260 Re: Precise Plan NEC Highway 111 & Deep Canyon Ray, on behalf of my client, Tom Miller, the applicant for the development at the NEC Highway ill and Deep Canyon, I am requesting an extension of one ( 1) year for the previously approved Precise Plan. Respectfully submitted, SUNCASTLE REAL ESTATE Sandy B m SB/cp cc: Tom Miller SUNCASTLE REAL ESTATE COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL LAND 45-800 DEEP CANYON RD. P.O. BOX 1739 PALM DESERT CALIFORNIA 92261 ® 619-340-2270 MIN[lI'ES PLANNING 001- IISSICN MARCH 21, 1989 VI. CCNSENP CALENDAR A. Continued Case No.� and PM 22285 - BOB Ri7STER, Applicant Request for approval of a two-month time extension for a mixed use hotel/restaurant/gas station project at the northeast corner of Highway 111 and Deep Canyon Road. B. Case No. PMW 88-13 - B013 EBBERT AND GRACE PESCHELT, Applicant Request for approval of a lot line adjustment to allow construction of a tennis court to be built on lot 10, Grapevine Street. C. Case No. PMW 89-4 - GEE" ,IN DEvEik)pM zu OD., Applicant Request for approval of a lot line adjustment between parcels 627-341-007 and 627-341-008 located at San Luis Ray and Shadow Lake Drive. Action: Moved by Commissioner Downs, seconded by Commissioner Whitlock, adopting the consent calendar items B and C by minute motion. Carried 3-0. Moved by Commissioner Dowels, seconded by Commissioner Whitlock, to remove item A from the consent calendar and open up for discussion under the miscellaneous section of the agenda. Carried 3-0. VII. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Continued Case Nos. C/Z 88-9 and pp 88-20 - M MUMTE INVFSR4Wr OD., Applicant Request for approval of a change of zone from R-3 (4) multi-family (one unit per 4000 square feet) to R-3 (one unit per 2500 square feet) for the north side of Alessandro between Deep Canyon Road and Cabrillo Avenue and a negative declaration and precise plan for a 13 unit one-story apartment project at the northeast corner of Alessandro Drive and Santa Ynez Avenue. Mr. Diaz noted that the applicant is requesting a one-month time extension to April 18, 1989. Connission has a to support request. 2 I 6 MI NLnES PLANNING C MMISSICN MARCH 21, 1989 Action: Moved by Downs, seconded by Whitlock, adopting the findings as presented by staff. Carried 3-0. Moved by Downs, seconded by Whitlock, adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 1343, recommending to city council approval of C/Z 89-3, PP 89-2, VAR 89-1 and associated street vacation, subject to conditions. Carried 3-0. VIII. NIISCELLANFS A. Discussion of Fairway Drive. Oral report will be given by the department of public works. Mr. Diaz indicated that Commissioner Richards had requested this information. He suggested that commission accept the report and file. This item will be discussed at the April 13, 1989, city council meeting. Commission decided to continue this item to the April 4, 1989, planning commission meeting when Commissioner Richards would be present to review this matter. Mr. Diaz noted that commission would be able to make recommendations to city council on this item, if any, and direct public works to present recommendations to council. B. Continued Case Nm%,PP 86-45,and PM 22285 - BOB FOSTER, Applicant Request for approval of a two-month time extension for a mixed use hotel/restaurant/gas station project at the northeast corner of Highway 111 and Deep Canyon Road. Commissioner Whitlock asked why this item was being continued for 2 months instead of a longer period of time. MR. BOB FOSTER, 117925 Arnally Court, Wichita Kansas, indicated that because he was unaware of the time increments which the City of Palm Desert deals with. He felt that two months would be adequate to perform items necessary under the permit. He is a franchisee developer with Marriott. He has met with .Marriott representatives and have committed to commence construction prior to July, 1989. In the process of arranging a w 8 i MINUPFS PLANNING CX74IISSICN MARCH 21, 1989 construction loan and as soon as that is complete the plan check fees will be submitted and proceed with project. Cammissioner Downs indicated that the applicant be granted 6 months so that they will not return requesting another extension after the two months. Chairman Erwood indicated that the conudssion has been strict on application for time extensions and that as a rule only two time extension are granted. He suggested that the applicant be granted a 1 year time extension to allow for proper preparations on the project to be completed. Mr. Foster agreed to the 1 time extension. Action: Moved by Cc nmissioner Whitlock, seconded by Commissioner Downs, to grant a 1 year time extension on Case No. PP 86-45 and PM 22285. Carried 3-0. IX. ORAL O YMNICATIONS RESIDENT AT 74-901 Borrego Drive SUSAN MACK, 74-881 Borrego Drive, requested clarification that this matter was caning back before the planning commission. Also, asked for additional information on the Fairway Drive Traffic Management Plan. Mr. Diaz noted that this matter is just an informational item to the planning commission, per Commissioner Richards request. This item will be brought before the city council for consideration at their April 13th meeting. Staff reports on this issue were distributed to residents per their request for additional information on the matter. Chairman Erwood directed staff to prepare a resolution of appreciation for Faith Ladlow for her service on the planning commission. Action: Moved by Commissioner Whitlock, seconded by Commissioner Downs, to direct staff to prepare a resolution of appreciation to Faith Ladlow for her service on the planning oommission. Carried 3-0. 9 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 . TELEPHONE(619)346-0611 PLANNING OCUMSSICN MELTIN3, kJMCE_OF ACPICN Date: March 9, 1989 Mr. Bob Foster Banner Associates-West 1900 North Amidon Suite 221 Wichita, KS 67204 Re: C.EP 86-45)and PM 22285 The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of March 7, 1989. PLANNING CCM�IISSICN 02M M M THIS ITEM TO MARCH 21 1989. M rION GUZRIE 44-0. Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Community Development, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. �y G•av'6'S,�q� N A. DIAZ, SEGTiSSION PALM DESERT PLANNING RAD/tm cc: Coachella Valley Water District Public Works Department Building & Safety Department Fire Marshal MIN[Ti�S - PALM DESERT PLANNING OOK41SSICN MARCH 7, 1989 VI. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Case No`� PM 22285 - BCB FOSTER, Applicant Request for approval of a two-month time extension for a mixed use hotel/restaurant/gas station project at the northeast corner of Highway 111 and Deep Canyon Road. B. Case No. PM9 89-1 - CAPRI INPERMTIMM, Applicant Request for approval to merge two existing parcels into one located at the southwest corner of El Paseo and Lupine Avenue. C. Case No. PM9 89-2 - BARCON DE<7EL0PN1ENP, Applicant Request for approval of a lot line adjustment between TT 23982 and Winterhaven located at the southwest corner of Hovley Lane and Portola Avenue. Commissioner Richards requested that Item A be removed and continued to allow staff to provide more information regarding previous time extension approvals. Action: Moved by Commissioner Downs, seconded by Commissioner Whitlock, adopting consent calendar items B and C by minute motion. Carried 4- 0. Moved by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner Whitlock, continuing consent calendar item A to March 21, 1989. Carried 4-0. VII. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Cbntinued Case Nos. CPA 89-2, C/Z 89-2, PP 89-1 - CITY OF PALM DESERT/PAMELA SMALLy,OOD, Applicants Request for approval amendment to General Plan - Circulation Element creating an internal circulation system for the southwest quarter of Section 4 T5S R6E; ammendnent to General Plan Land Use Map redesignating the northeast corner of Country Club Drive and Portola Avenue from low 2 INTEROFFICE City of Palm Desert T0: Planning CcmTLissicn FROM: Catherine Sass, Associate Planner DATE: March 21, 1989 SUBJECT: Request.For Time Extension The Residence Inn project, PP 86-45, was granted a one-year time extension on March 15, 1988. Minutes from this time extension are attached. The applicant now requests a two-month time extension to canplete escrow. Catherine Sass Associate Planner /tn Attachments Mar. 1 '89 16:13 0000 5RNFAX515Hseries P. 2/ 2 CA SA • o ` O t A iL.l V,-Z wZ l al t-�s y , V O BANNSASSOCIATES-WEST u;ylNOli'1'11 AMIDON \ ^ • _ (�. .A� ��-`^+�'^' 1+IICHI'li\,KS 67204 V, � (3fb)N1H?ip1 . PAS M-8 18)7 li I I ' l i i II i I� �I I' j , 1 j I I Z T d saIJasHSTGXbANHS 0000 ZT :9T 68, T 'j?w Li 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE(619)346-0611 PLANNING COPMIISSION MEETING NOTICE OF ACTION Date: March 17, 1988 Mr. Sandy Baum Suncastle Real Estate P.O. Box 1739 Palm Desert, CA 92261 Re: PP 86-45 The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of March 15, 1988. APPROVED A ONE-YEAR TIME ERTENSION. CARRIED 3-0. Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Community Development, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. RAMD A. DIAZ, SELT PALM DESERT PLANNING CI�MISSION RAD/tm cc: Coachella Valley Water District Public Works Department Building & Safety Department Fire Marshal PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 15, 1988 Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact and PP 88-2, subject to conditions as amended. Carried 3-0. VIII. MISCELLANEOUS A. Consent Calendar Continued Case No.; PP 86-45 � THoMAs MILLER, Applicant Request for a one-year time extension for a project located at the northeast corner of Highway 111 and Deep Canyon Road. Mr. Diaz explained why the time extension request had been continued and indicated that staff wanted to add a condition to allow the alignment of Deep Canyon and the hotel not be allowed to commence until the a restaurant foundation had been poured. Staff recommended denial of the time extension if the conditions were not added. Mr. Sandy Baum, representative, felt that the close proximity of the Velvet Turtle, Cleve's, and Johns would prohibit adding a condition regarding the restaurant and did not see a problem with the alignment of Deep Canyon. Ms. Kandy Allen of the city attorney's office advised the Commission that if escrow did not go through, the city would have nothing. After further discussion occuLission felt that the project should be placed back on the consent calendar and approved without adding any conditions. Staff explained that the approval would only require a minute motion action. Action: Moved by Vice Chairman Richards, seconded by Commissioner Downs, granting the one-year time extension. Carried 3-0. B. Discussion on the North Sphere Specific Plan and Draft Environmental Impact Report - CITY OF PRIM DESERT, Applicant Request for consideration of the North Sphere Specific Plan and Draft Enviroruiiental Impact Report for the area generally located south of Interstate 10, west of Washington Street, north 5 MIN[1PFS PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION FE BRUARY 2, 1988 VI. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Case No.QP 86-45 - THOMAS MILLER, Applicant Request for a one year time extension for a project located at the northeast corner of Highway 111 and Deep Canyon Road. Mr. Diaz explained that staff would like to condition the extension to include a reimbursement agreement for funds the city will expend on the Deep Canyon/Highway 111 realignment and acquire the right-of-way. He noted that this was a condition of approval to contribute funds when the project develops, but indicated that the city wishes to proceed on the realignment. MR. SANDY BAUM, 45-800 Deep Canyon, addressed the comaission and explained that financing had fallen through and they were in the process of getting financing that should go through on April 15. He also indicated that the property was still in escrow and it might be difficult to obtain the present owner's agreement. Mr. Diaz stated that the precise plan approval runs with the land and reco iTended that. this matter be continued to March 15 and the applicant will know if he has the property and at that time the commission can decide whether or not to approve the time extension. Action: Moved by Commissioner Downs, seconded by Commissioner Richards, continuing PP 86-45 to March 15, 1988. Carried 5-0. VII. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Case No. TT 23148 - SHAM INC., Applicant Request for approval of a 15 lot residential subdivision located on the west side of Edgehill Drive south of Pitahaya. Mr. Joy outlined the salient points of the staff report. He indicated that a letter was received by Mr. George Fox requesting that approval be withheld until water rights have been acquired from Lowell Wooden. Staff recommended approval of the project. Commissioner Richards expressed concern regarding single family hones backing onto the channel and the channel's ability to withstand 2 / CITY OF PALM DESERT TRANSMITTAL LETTER 1 . TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council 11 . REQUEST: Approval of a negative declaration of environmental impact and a precise plan of design to allow construction of a gas station as part of the Residence Inn project on 10 acres in the PC (4) , S.P. and PR (5) , N S.P. at the northeast corner of Highway III and Deep Canyon Road. III . APPLICANT: Thomas Miller Suncastle Real Estate 11753 San Vincente P.O. Box 1739 Los Angeles, CA 90049 Palm Desert, CA 92261 IV. CASE NO: PP 86-45 Amendment #2 V. DATE: March 12, 1987 V1 . CONTENTS: A. Staff Recommendation. B. Discussion. C. Draft Resolution No. D. City Council Resolution No. 87-4. E. Planning Commission Minutes involving Case No. PP 86-45. F. Planning Commission Resolution No. 1194. G. Planning Commission Staff Report dated December 16, 1986. H. Exhibit A, J.H. Huntsberry letter dated February 18, 1987. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- A. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve the findings and adopt Resolution No. B. DISCUSSION: The attached resolution contains additional city council conditions Imposed on the above referenced project at the .pubilc hearing on February 26, 1987. Prepared by: Reviewed and Approved by: CS/tm RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PRECISE PLAN" OF DESIGN TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A GAS STATION AS PART OF THE RESIDENCE INN PROJECT WITHIN 10 ACRES IN THE PC (4) S.P. AND PR-5 N, S.P. ZONE AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF HIGHWAY ill AND DEEP CANYON ROAD. CASE NO. PP 86-45 Amendment #2 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 8th day of January, 1987, hold a duly noticed public hearing and continued public hearings on February 26 and March 12 to consider the request of THOMAS MILLER for the above described project; and ' WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedure for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 80-89, " in that the director of community development has determined that the project will not have ""a significant environmental Impact and a negative declaration is hereby certified; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and, cons idering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said city council did find the following facts and reasons to exist to justify granting approval of said precise plan: . 1 . The design of the precise plan will not substantially depreciate property values in the vicinity. 2. The precise plan will not unreasonably interfere with the use or enjoyment of property in the vicinity by the occupants thereof for lawful purposes. 3. The precise plan will not endanger the public peace, health, safety or general welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, 8E IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1 . That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the commission in this case; 2. That approval of Precise Plan 86-45 Amendment #2 is hereby granted for reasons subject to the attached conditions. RESOLUTION NO. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this day of 1987, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RICHARD S. KELLY, Mayor ATTEST: SHEILA R. GILLIGAN, City Clerk CS/tm 2 RESOLUTION NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO. PP 86-45 Amendment. #2 Department of Community unity Development: 1 . The development of the property shall conform substantially with exhibits on file with the department of community development/planning, as modified by the following conditions. '2. Construction of a portion of said project shall commence within one year from the date of final approval unless an extension of time is granted; otherwise said approval shall become null , void and of no effect whatsoever. 3. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein which are. in addition to all municipal ordinances and state and federal statutes now .in force, or which hereafter may be in force. 4. Prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contemplated by this approval , the applicant shall first obtain permits and/or clearance from the following agencies: Coachella Valley Water District Palm Desert Architectural Commission , City Fire Marshal Public Works Department Palm Desert Water & Services District Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to the department of building and safety at the time of issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. 5. The hotel shall provide solid-core or steel doors equipped with dead bolt locks, door viewers and latch guards. 6. The addressing of the rooms should use even numbers to the left and odd numbers to the right to assist emergency vehicles in locating rooms. 7. Access to Highway 111 must be approved by Caltrans and City,of Palm Desert Public Works department. 8. The requested assurances from the developer by the Hidden Palms Homeowners Association will become conditions of approval , and have been expressed as follows: 3 RESOLUTION NO. a. That there be no usable balconies on the north side of their property facing toward Hidden Palms. b. A 90 foot setback from the building line to the Hidden Palms wall will be provided on the northern property line. C. That a minimum of two rows of existing date palms remain as a barrier between the Hidden Palms wall and the proposed parking area. d. That additional planting be done under the date palm barrier to a height capable of softening the effect of only seeing the palm tree trunks from Hidden Palms. e. That they prefer tile to be used at the gas station building, rather than metal . f. That no obtrusive lighting be done on the north side to illuminate the hot water building, parking area or planned amenities. g. That the trash enclosure be moved from the northwest corner for noise and odor consideration. 9. Handicap parking stalls shall be distributed appropriately throughout entire site. 10. Detailed parking lot and building lighting plan shall be submitted to staff for approval , subject to applicable lighting standards, plan to be prepared by a qualified lighting engineer. 11 . Three to 3 . 5 foot mounding shall be provided to sufficiently screen parking lot areas from streets. 12. Trash provisions shall be approved by applicable trash company and city prior to issuance of building permit. 13. All roof-mounted mechanical equipment shall be screened from all sides with materials similar to building walls. 14. Project shall be subject to art in public places fee per Ordinance No. 473. 15. A parcel map filing shall create parcels to the satisfaction of the director of community development. 16. The architecture of the future restaurant shall be compatible with the hotel . 4 RESOLUTION NO. 11. All on-site utilities, including cable television, shall be placed underground and shall be completely concealed from view except certain appurtenances as may be approved by the director of community development. 18. Only delivery diesel trucks built after 1974 'shall be used. 19. All conditions of the architectural commission shall be met. 20. The precise plan will contain and provide all items delineated In the staff report dated December 16, . 1986. 21 . Decorative wails shall be compatible with adjacent developments. 22. The service station shall be redesigned to be more compatible with the Residence Inn to reflect the concerns ' identified by the staff report dated December 16, 1986. 23. The date palms on the site shall be maintained. In the event that a date palm dies or requires removal , it shall be replaced by a'tree approved by city staff. Department of Public Works: 1 . Drainage and signalization fund fees, as required by city ordinance, shall be paid prior to grading permit issuance. 2. Drainage facilities shall be provided, per Ordinance No. 218 and the Master Drainage Plan, to the specifications of the director of public works. 3. Storm drain construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study by the private engineer that is approved by the department of public works. 4. Full public Improvements, including traffic safety lighting, as required by ordinance and the director of public works, shall be installed in accordance with city standards. 5. Complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the city engineer for checking and approval before construction of any Improvements is commenced. The engineer shall submit "as-built" plans prior to the acceptance of the improvements by the city. 6. All private driveways and parking lots shall be inspected by the engineering department and a standard inspection fee shall be paid prior to grading permit issuance. 5 RESOLUTION NO. 7. Landscaping maintenance on Highway Ill and Deep Canyon Road shall be provided by the property owner. 8. Existing utilities on Highway III and Deep Canyon Road shall be undergrounded per each respective utility district's recommendation. if determined to be unfeasible applicant shall agree to participate in any future utility undergrounding district. 9. Traffic safety striping on Highway III and Deep Canyon Road shall be provided to the specifications of the director of public works. A traffic control plan must be submitted to and approved by the director of public works before placing pavement markings. 10. Complete grading plans and specifications shall be submitted; as required by ordinance, to the director of public works for checking and approval prior to issuance of any permits. 11 . Dedication of 55/58 feet of right-of-way on Highway Ill and Deep Canyon shall be done prior to issuance of any permits and approval of plans. 12. Installation of curb and gutter, matching paving and 8 foot meandering sidewalk on Highway 111 and Deep Canyon Road. 13. Offsite Improvement plans to be approved by public works department and a surety posted to guarantee the required offsite improvements prior to grading permit issuance. 14. Installation of one-half landscaped median in Highway Ill or cash payment for one-half the cost of landscaped median at the option of the director of public works. 15. Traffic analysis to the prepared for the project to address the specific impacts on existing networks (street and intersections) and the proposed mitigation measures recommended for approval by the city. 16. Size, number and location of driveways to public works specifications with only three driveway approaches to be allowed to serve this property. 17. Complete parcel map shall be submitted as required by ordinance to the director of public works for checking and approval and be recorded before issuance of any permits. 18. Any and all off-site improvements shall be. preceded by the approval of plans and the issuance of valid encroachment permit(s) by the department of public works. 19. A complete preliminary soils investigation, conducted, by a registered 6 RESOLUTION NO. soils engineer, shall be submitted to and approved by the department of public works prior to issuance of the grading permit. 20. Access to Highway III shall be restricted through raised medians, to right turn ingress and egress and approved by Caltrans. 21 . A secondary access, 24 feet wide, shall be provided on Deep Canyon Road at the project's north boundary. 22. Applicant shall provide for bus turnout on Highway Ill to the satisfaction of the director of public works and Sunline Transit Agency. 23. All Improvements within the State right=of-way shall be constructed to Caltrans standards. 24. Median islands at both project entrances as shown on the project site plan shall be continuous and extend into driveways far enough to preclude/minimize potential vehicle conflict. 25. If traffic conflicts develop, as determined by the director of public works, at the most southerly driveway on Deep Canyon Road applicant shall modify drive to restrict movements to right turn ingress/egress only. 26. Access driveways shall be a minimum of 24 feet for Highway Ill entry and .Deep Canyon exit, and 18 feet for Highway III exit and Deep. Canyon entry. 27. Existing signal at Deep Canyon and Highway ill shall be, modified to the satisfaction of both Caltrans and the City of Palm Desert. City Fire Marshal : _.: 1 . Install a water system capable of delivering 3000 GPM fire flow from any fire hydrant for a three hour duration in addition to domestic supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement. 2. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants so that no .point of any building is more than 200 feet from a fire hydrant measured along approved vehicular travel ways. a. exterior surfaces of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow, and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. b. curbs shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. C. hydrants shall not be located closer than 25 feet to any building. 7 RESOLUTION NO. 3. Prior to Issuance of a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and two copies of the water system plan to the fire marshal for review. Upon approval , one copy will be sent to the building department, and the original will be returned to the developer. 4. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil .engineer and approved by the water company, with the following certification: "1 certify that the design of the water system in Case No. PP 86-45 is In accordance with the requirements prescribed by the fire marshal ." 5. Prior to delivery of combustible materials to the building site, the required water system shall be installed, operating, and delivering the required flow. 6. Additional fire protection requirements may be necessary when the applicant submits specific plans for consideration and approval . 7. All building over 5000 square feet require an approved fire sprinkler system. 8. All three story buildings must have a fire marshal approved fire alarm system. City Council Conditions: 1. There will be no car wash on the gas station site. 2. The Mobil Mart will be limited in the type of products sold to automotive Products normally and customarily associated with the sale of gasoline, snack type foods and soft drinks as specified in Exhibit A. No alcoholic beverages will be sold. 3. Hours of operation will be limited to 6:00 a.m. to 11 :00 p.m. Monday through Sunday. 4. Building permits for the gas station will not be issued until final inspection for the hotel have occurred. The site may be graded as part of an overall grading plan encompassing the entire site. 5. There will be no outside storage. 6. There will be no sales promotions of items sold in the Mobil mart. 7. The exit located to the north on Deep Canyon Road shall be built with a crashgate, designed to serve as a secondary access point should traffic and/or circulation problems arise at the southern egress. 8 RESOLUTION NO. 8. The architectural design of the gas station will be reviewed for approval by city council . 9 Mobil Oil Corporation EXHIBIT A February 18, 1987 Ramon A. Diaz Director of Community Development City of Palm Desert '73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 RE: PP-86-45 MOBIL STATION DEEP CANYON & 111 PALM DESERT Dear Mr. Diaz: In the City Council Meeting of February 12, 1987, the members of the Council raised 3 major concerns; (1) the car wash, (2) hours of operation, and (3) items to be sold in the Mobil Mart. In reference to item one, Mobil would be willing to withdraw its application for the car wash if that would help the approval of the project. Mobil originally proposed a 24-hour operation to best serve the community, The Residence Inn and the late night motoring public. Due to the 'Council's . concerns, I would be willing to propose to Mobil Management that the station be operated 6 to 12. While I can appreciate concerns one might have against operation to midnight, I believe the community will find our operation no more objectionable than the Residence Inn, who has agreed to locate next to us. The extensive landscaping and modern efficient down lighting will prevent any light spillage off of our site, and, of course, we will not have any automotive repair work, just gasoline and snack sales. Since the operation is computer controlled, no bells or noise will be generated from the site. In my opinion, the residents on Deep Canyon, the closest being over 300 feet away, will not be adversely impacted by the station. In fact, the station will be shielded from view by most homes due to The Residence Inn. The operation of the Mobil Mart will be restricted to items like: (1) Soft drink (10) Hostess & Frito Lay type (2) Chips and Nuts products. (3) Jucie (11) Ice Cream - individual (4) Milk (less than quart sizes, pints or smaller. size) (12) Coffee (prepared) (5) Prepared Sandwiches (13) Health & Beauty Aids (Already made) like aspirin or toothpaste. (6) Film & Batteries (14) Automotive supplies like oil (7) Cigarettes & Lighters and maintenance items. . (8) Chewing Cum (15) Small bags of ice. (9) Candy & Mints (16) Prepackaged cookies & crackers. Items we will not sell: (1) Beer & Wine (2) Canned goods such as vegatable or fruits (3) Sandwiches which are prepared on site - like Arco's. hamburgers. (4) No fresh produce — lettuce or similar (5) No meats .— other than Jerky-type snacks The Council was also concerned about the items stacked outside on the porch. L would be willing to have a restriction against outdoor displays. As one can see, the items we wish to sell are not the type of food one would make a trip to the "Mobil station" for, however, the Residence Inn with their full individual kitchens might find it convenient to buy some of.the items. This, of course, would reduce the guests'. need to drive to a market. Mobil is very desirous. of building a facility that we and the City can be proud of. As you know, we have worked many long and hard hours -with the City on station layout, landscaping, architecture and believe Mobil will be an asset to Deep Canyon and Highway 111 and the community. Sincerely, J. H. Huntsberry Senior Real Estate Representative 0677P/mlt i MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION DLCLMBER 16, 1986 VI . CONSENT CALENDAR A. Case No. PMW 86-2.5 - MARLENE ZIMMERMAN, Applicant Request: for approval of .a lot line adjustment to allow for construction of a Swimming pool . B. Case No. PMW 86-26 - GEORGE GREENAMYER, Applicant Request for approval of :� pained map w-.)iver to . officially rW ignatr= two parrelS created by the Palm Valley Storm Chanfiel dedication. C. Case Nos. TT 16691 , PP 84-32 B C/7_ 84-12 - McBAIL COMPANY, Applicant. Request for approval of a one year time extension. Action: Moved by Commissioner Rirhnvd,�, secr7nrb;d by (,ommissinner Downs, approving the consent calendar by minrte notion. Carried A-D. VII . ORAL COMMUNICATIONS None. Vill . PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Continued Case No OP BM KNHAS MILLER, Applicant Request for approval of a nvgvtiv� r-cloration of env irnmm(-ntal impart and a precise plan of design to allow rnnStiu-iInn of lkH unit inn, a fu l I service restaurant and a as �J it i on on 10 acres in the PC (4) S.P. and PP-5 M. S.P. at the northeast corner of Hialway 111 and Ken Canyon Roars. Ms. Sass outlined the salient mints of the staff report and amende•1 conditions #11 and N27. Chairman Erwend 9j:2end the p"Wic t-stimony and asked if the, applicant wished to address the rommi o ion. 41 M i NLITES PALM DESERT PLANNING, COMMISSION DECEMBER 16, 1986 MR . SANDY BAUM, 45-800 Der,p Cariynn, st,nted -that there were gentlemen in attendance who conducted a sound study for the car, wash at Ramon. He shah-rl that IF Commission felt there was a problem, the hours of operation could he limited. MR. BOB FOSTER, Residence Inn. indicated that he was present to answer any questions . upon questions from Commissioner Richards, Mr. Foster clarified that he was not involved with the Mobil mini-market . MR. DAVILI FLMID. architect, outl inrd the progress of the last few planning corr,missirn pihlir heorinq-. He staters that the new design was apprnvA.d In, the architectural commission. He stated that while their philosophy of design was an uncomplicated approach, anri wis morq, appropriate, Ise would not debate the issue. Commissioner P,i chards. stated that this is an entryway into the -city and would like to create someFhin❑ different thorn Long Pearls or Los Angrlrs and a faci I ity that would last long into the fil u? e. He stated that he would like to see a design that ornuld incorporate and tie- in the architecture of the gas station and felt that, in the Tong run it would benefit the applirn t, r)isn. Mr. Flood responded that money was not the issue, but is a concept that their firm i s familiar with. Mr . Floors stated that he would respond to the concerns. MR. KEN KIMBALL . car wa;h m.�nutarturcr , nutlined the noise levels to he expected and felt it rompnred to a vacuum cleaner and also felt noise would not be a problem. Chairman Erwood asked if Mr. Kimball had taken a nnis.e re.ndinq at highway III and Deep Canyon. Mr. KimholI responded no. that he did not know it was a concern. Chairman Erwor;d .toted that commission was r_onrerned with a car wash in that: L_,c=_.tine and the fairly high noise level as stated in the staff rep n t . Mr . Kimball stated that they are normally open 7:00 a,m, to 6:fl0 p.m, and felt the hours should not be a prohlpm. Commissioner Richards asked if any of the car washes operated from 8:3n a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Mr . Kimball responded that most car washes operate 24 hours. Mr. 'Kimball also states{ that a door could be installed to create a noise barrier level of less than 07 decibels and would lower, during the dry run. Chairman Erwood Stated that he would like the door to be down during the wash and dry Cycle, Chairman Frwood ,asked if anyone present wished to speak in FAVOR or OPPOSITION to the proposed. i MINUTES PALM DEbERT PLANNING COHMISSION UECEMBER Ib, ly86 MR. VIC HO',tiI_ER, 44179 Malden Court-Hidden Palms, expressed concern rego( oin9 the date. Balm itree.s. He felt the applicant should he r equ I r erI tc, Ina i nta i n them. Chairman Erwood stated that this could be required as a condition of approval . Mr. Diaz stared that me dove palm trees acting as barriers of that portion & the plan should be maintained and if they should die, they should he replaced by a date palm tree as approved by city staff. MR, hnB HUBBARD, '14-r.')0 Corale, Palm Springs, stated that they were not complaining about the cost, but felt that some of the t.h 1 nqu no I d I fig the project up were not necessary. lie felt that approval s,wi ld be given to the hotel and restaurant now and then approval could be obtained for the car wash and gas station at a later hate. He also stated that if the dates are eliminated as they start , clean up should not be a problem. Chairman Erwood closed the public testimony. Lonmissioner Whitlock agreed with staff that the gas station and car, wash needed more work. Commissioner Richards stared that he would like to pass this project with the ability of staff to approve the necessary changes that have been required . He felt that problems with the car wash and architecture or the gas station could he worked out. He also felt that the projo'rt sholdd be passed with the modifications to the conditions. Mr . Diaz summarized the conditions. 1.Omllll 'iSl Unr I' Whitlock atkarl it staff had received photos from Scott.sdaly . Ms . Sass r'r..plled that the photos received were of typical gas station shurtures. Commissioner ohl ords felt that the modifications being asked were rat out of lino. Chairnr„n Erwood stated that he would like the condition acklyd For the Woos of operation. Mr. Diaz stated that: the car' wash opSations h-mrs would be B:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. and that the door On the hui1ding will he closed during operation as well aS the date Palurs being maintained. Chairman Erwood asked It the applicant Concur"r: d. He indicated yes. Achim: Moved by Commissioner Rio-.hams, senanded by Commissioner Whitlock, adopting the rindingn as presented by staff. (tarried 4-0. l 4 MI NOTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION DECEMBER 16, 1986 Moved by Commissioner Richards, snconiinrl I)v i.ommiss loner Whitlock, adopting Planning Commission RnSelfation No, 1194. approving PP 86-45 subject to conditions as amended. Carried On. CHAIRMAN ERWODD CALLED A FIVE MINUTE REVESS AT OUT P.M. - B. Continued Case Nos. CUP 86-5 and VAR 86-4 Amendment RICHARD AND MAY LEE, Applicants Request for approval of a conditional use permit and associated variance to allow the conversion of four existing standard rrnital units to eight senior citizen rental units under provisions of Chapter 25 .52 Senior Housing Overlay of Palm Desert Municipal Code, lorated at We southeast corner of San Rafael Avenue and Catalina Way. Mr . Diaz explained that the request had been withdrawn by the applicant and that no action was required by the commisVon. Action: None. C. Case PP/CUP 86-50 - R.C. 11009115, Applicant Request. for' aprrnva I of a e r i s 0 plan/conditional visp ne,mit .nod negative declaration of environmoriai hrlpaTt to Fermit development of a ret- iremnl- ,ommut)iry jnrlijring mobile homes and recreaf ionpi volor les with ancillary recreational amenities on an F13 acre parcel of land on the north 5 !dR of Frank Sinatra Drive opposite the end of Del Safari Drive. Mr. Smith outlined the salient points of 1-h- staff report and noted that Wallace, Roberts, and InAff had reviewed the plans and did not indicate any problems . Staff recommended approval subject to conditions. Commissioner Picharrls asked For ;-- f-arifir-3tion regarding transient occupancy taxes. Mr. Smith responded that a six percent occupancy tax would be levied. Chairman Erwood opgnod the ruhl ir testimony and asked if the applicant wished to address the commission. 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 January 26, 1987 JAN 2 8 1987 CUMHURICI V EV LOPMEOESERTNT ARTMENT Mr . Thomas Miller 11753 San Vincente Los Angeles , California 90049 Dear Mr . Miller : Subject: PP 86-45 At Its meeting of January 8 , 1987 , the Palm Desert City Council adopted Resolution No. 87-4 , approving the subJect precise plan of design to allow construction of a 168 unit inn and full service restaurant at the northeast corner of Highway III and Deep Canyon Road . Consideration of a gas station and car wash at that site was continued to the meeting of February 12 , 1987 . We are enclosing for your records a fully executed copy of the aforementioned resolution . If you have any questions or require any additional information , please do not hesitate to contact us . Sincerely, SHEILA R . GIL IGAN CITY CLERK/PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER SRG:mpf Enclosure (as noted) cc : •l,8"epartment of Community Development Suncastle Real Estate , P. O. Box 1739 , Palm Desert , CA 92261 RESOLUTION NO. 87-4 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CiTY OF r 'PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PRECISE PLAN 1OF DESIGN TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A 168 UNIT INN AND A FULL SERVICE RESTAURANT WITHIN 10 ACRES iN THE PC (4) S.P. AND PR-5 N, S.P. ZONE AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF HIGHWAY ' III AND DEEP CANYON ROAD. CASE NO. PP 86-45 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 8th day of January, 1987, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider the request of THOMAS MILLER for the above described project; and WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert' Procedure for implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 80-89," in that the director of community development has determined that the project will not have a significant environmental Impact and a negative declaration is hereby certified; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all Interested persons desiring to be heard, said city council did find the following facts and reasons to exist to justify granting approval of said precise plan: 1 . The design of the precise plan will not substantially depreciate property values in the vicinity. 2. The precise plan will not unreasonably interfere with the use or enjoyment of property in the vicinity by the occupants thereof for lawful purposes. 3. The precise plan will not endanger the public peace, health, safety or general welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE 1T RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1 . That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the city council in this case; 2. That approval of Precise Plan 86-45 is hereby granted for reasons subject to the attached conditions. i I i RESOLUTION NO. 87-4 r. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert City Council held on thIs; 8th day of January, 1987, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: BENSON, CRITES, SNYDER, WILSON, AND KELLY NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE i+ r „ .,.� .. RICHAWS. KELLY, Mayor (ATTEST;. SHEILA R. GLLt4GAN9 City erk CS/tm I 2 RESOLUTION NO. 87-4 " " CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL , CASE NO. PP 86-45 Department of Community Develoaaenta " ' 1 . " The development of the property shall conform substantially with exhibits ' "on file with the department of community development/planning, as modified by the following conditions. r 1 f 1� rt , , 11 . . ' 2." 'Construction of a portion of said project shall commence within one year from the date of final approval unless an extension of time is granted; otherwise said approval shall become null , void and of no effect ni"whatsoever. 3. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the 'restrictions and limitations set forth herein which are in addition to all municipal ordinances and state and federal statutes now In force, or which hereafter may be in force. 4. Prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contemplated by this approval , the applicant shall first obtain permits ;: ,and/or clearance from the following agencies: Coachella Valley Water District Palm Desert Architectural Commission City Fire Marshal " Public Works Department Palm Desert Water S Services District Evidence of said permit or clearance from ' the above agencies shall be presented to the department of building and safety at the time of issuance of -a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. 5. The hotel shall provide solid-core or steel doors equipped with dead bolt .. locks, door viewers and latch guards. 6. The addressing of the rooms should use even numbers to the left and odd numbers to the right to assist emergency .vehicles In locating rooms. 7. Access .to Highway III must be approved by Caltrans and City of Palm Desert Public Works department. 8. The requested assurances from the developer by the Hidden Palms Homeowners "Association will become conditions of approval , and have been expressed as follows: 3 i h� I it i RESOLUTION MD. 67-4 is „•, �•, gl 1,{ a. That there be no usable balconies on the north side of their property _ facing toward Hidden Palms. JI b. A 90 foot setback from the building I ine to the Hidden Palms wall wl 11 be provided on the .northern .property 1 ine. , - •, .- ..,, 1 ,.:r-0n c. .i That , a minimum of two rows of existing date palms remain as a barrier,between the Hidden Palms wall and the proposed parking area. d. That additional planting be done under the date palm barrier to a height capable of softening the effect of only seeing the palm tree -,trunks from Hidden Palms. e. That no obtrusive lighting be done on the north side to illuminate the hot water building, parking area or planned amenities. f.: That the trash enclosure be moved from the northwest corner for noise and odor consideration. 9. Handicap parking stalls shall be distributed appropriately throughout entire site. 10. Detailed parking lot and building lighting plan shall be submitted to staff for approval , subject to applicable lighting standards, plan to be prepared by a qualified lighting engineer. i 11 . Three to 3. 5 foot mounding shall be provided to sufficiently screen parking lot areas from streets. 12. Trash provisions shall be approved by applicable trash company and city prior-to .issuance of building permit. 13. All roof-mounted mechanical equipment shall be screened from all sides with materials similar to building walls. . , , , t . 1 14. Project .s,hal i be subject to art in public places fee per Ordinance No. 473. 15. A parcel map filing shall create parcels to the satisfaction of the director of community development. 16. The architecture of the future restaurant shall be compatible with the hotel . 117. All on-site utilities, Including cable television, shall be placed underground and shall be completely concealed from view except certain appurtenances as may be approved by the director of community development. i 4 i I i i RESOLUTION NO. 87-4 i i 18. 1 Only delivery diesel trucks built after 1974 shall be used. 19. All conditions of the architectural commission shall be met. 20. The precise plan will contain and provide all items delineated In the staff- report dated December 16, 1986. 21 . Decorative walls shall be compatible with adjacent developments. 22. .. The date palms on the site shall be maintained. In the event that a date palm dies or requires removal , it shall be replaced by a tree approved by city staff. Department of Public Works: I .,; ,. Drainage and signalization fund fees, as required by city ordinance, shall be paid prior to grading permit issuance. 2. Drainage facilities shall be provided, per Ordinance No. 218 and the .., . Master Drainage Plan, to the specifications ' of the director of public works. 3. Storm drain construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study by the private engineer that Is approved by the department of public works. 4. Full public Improvements, including traffic safety lighting, as required by ordinance and the director of public works, shall be installed in accordance with city standards. 5. Complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the city engineer for checking and approval „ before construction of any improvements Is commenced. The engineer shall submit "as-built" plans prior to the acceptance of the improvements by the city. 6.,. All private driveways and parking lots shall be inspected by the engineering department and a standard inspection fee shall be paid prior to grading permit Issuance. 7.. -,Landscaping maintenance on Highway ill and , Deep Canyon Road shall be provided by the property owner. 8.: . Existing utilities on Highway III and Deep Canyon Road shall be undergrounded per each respective utility district's recommendation. If determined to be unfeasible applicant shall agree to participate in any „ , ifuture utility undergrounding district. 5 RESOLUTION NO. 87-4 9. Traffic safety striping on Highway iIi and Deep Canyon Road shall be provided to the specifications of the director of public works. A traffic control plan must be submitted to and approved by the director of public works before placing pavement markings. 10. Complete grading plans and specifications shall be submitted; as 'required by ordinance, to the director of public works for checking and approval prior to issuance of any permits. ' ' I1 ., Dedication of 55/58 feet of right-of-way on Highway ill and Deep Canyon shall be done prior to Issuance of any permits and approval of plans.' 12. installation of curb and gutter, matching paving and 8 foot meandering s i dewa 1 k on H 1 ghway III and Deep Canyon Road. ' II ' ' 13.E Offslte improvement plans to be approved by public works department and a surety posted to guarantee the required offsite improvements prior to grading permit issuance. 14. 1 Installation of one-half landscaped median In Highway Ill or' cash payment for one-half the cost of landscaped median at the option of the director of public works. 15. Traff.ic analysis to the prepared for the project to address the specific impacts on existing networks (street and intersections) and the proposed , :, mitigation measures recommended for approval by the city. 16. Size, number and location of driveways to public works specifications with only three driveway approaches to be allowed to serve this property. 17. , Complete parcel map shall be submitted as required by ordinance to ! ! the d l rector, of pub i c works for check i ng and approve l and be recorded before ,Assuance of any permits. 18. Any and all off-site improvements shall be preceded by the approval of plans and the issuance of valid encroachment permit(s) by the department Of public works. 19. A complete preliminary soils investigation, conducted by a registered soi Is, engineer, shall be submitted to and approved by the department of public works prior to issuance of the grading permit. 20. iAccess to Highway III shall be restricted through raised medians, to right turn Ingress and egress and approved by Caltrans. 21 . A secondary access, 24 feet wide, shall be provided on Deep Canyon Road at the project's north boundary. 6 RESOLUTION NO. 87-4 22. Applicant shall provide for bus turnout on Highway III to the satisfaction of the director of public works and Sunline Transit Agency. 23. All improvements within :the State right-of-way shall be constructed to Caltrans standards. 24. Median Islands at both project entrances as shown on the project site plan shall be continuous and extend into driveways far enough to preclude/minimize potential vehicle conflict. 25. ,• If traffic conflicts develop, as determined by the director of public works, at the most southerly driveway on Deep Canyon Road applicant shall modify drive to restrict movements to right turn ingress/egress only. 26. Access driveways shall be a minimum of 24 feet for Highway III entry and Deep Canyon exit, and 18 feet for Highway III exit and Deep Canyon entry. 27. Existing signal at Deep Canyon and Highway III shall be modified to the satisfaction of both Caltrans and the City of Palm Desert. City Fire Marshal : 1 . Install a water system capable of delivering 3000 GPM fire flow from any fire hydrant for a three hour duration in addition to domestic supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement. 2. install Riverside County super fire hydrants so that no point of any building is more than 200 feet from a fire hydrant measured along approved vehicular travel ways. a. exterior surfaces of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow, and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. b. curbs shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. C. hydrants shall not be located closer than 25 feet to any building. 3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and two copies of the water system plan to the fire marshal for review. Upon approval , one copy will be sent to the building department, and the original will be returned to the developer. 4. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and approved by the water company, with the following certification: "1 I 7 RESOLUTION NO. 87-4 n� „: .••. certify that the design of the water system in Case No. PP 86-45' is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the fire marshal ." 5. Prior to delivery of combustible materials to the building site, the required water system shall be Installed, operating, and delivering the required flow. 6. '. Additional fire protection requirements may be necessary when the applicant submits specific plans for consideration and approval . 7. All building over 5000 square feet require an approved fire sprinkler system. ,., 8. All three story buildings must have a fire marshal approved fire alarm system:'' 8 i I INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM City of Palm Desert TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: CATHERINE SASS DATE: DECEMBER 2, 1986 SUBJECT: THOMAS MILLER, PP 86-45 The above continued case was to address five Items: (I : Drainage Grading 3. Noise generation from air conditioning unit placement 4. Noise generation from car wash 5. A unique village-style architecture to the Mobil Station ` o To date items 1 and 2 have been addressed. ilt � 3�wi 1l�be addressed by the. architectural commission prior to final approval . Item 4 has not been submitted by the applicant. Item 5 has been submitted and will require further modification. Staff was prepared to present a recommendation on this case, however, a new modified site plan was delivered late afternoon November 25. Staff has determined that changes may be sufficient to warrant further study, therefore, recommends this case be continued. 4vi o okok b) j C . a� CATHERINE SASS ASSISTANT PLANNER CS/tm �e INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM DEC 191986 City of Palm Desert CDMMUNIC TY Of PALMENT DESERPARTMENi TO: Bruce A . Altman , City Manager Amon A . Diaz , Director of Community Development FROM: Sheila R . Gilligan , City Clerk/P. I . O. DATE : December 17 , 1986 SUBJECT: Corner of Highway III and Deep Canyon Jean Benson contacted me today relative to the Planning Commission approval of the inn , full service restaurant , and gas station proposed for the corner of Highway III and Deep Canyon . The purpose of her call was to call this item up for Council review without prejudice . i SHEILA R . GILLIGAN CITY CLERK/P. I .O. SRG :mpf 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NOTICE OF ACTION Date: December 16, 1986 Thomas Miller Sandy Daum 11753 San Vincente P.O. Box 17.39 Los Angeles, CA 90049 Palm Desert, CA 92261 Re: PP 86-45 The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has ronsidered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of December 16, 1986. APPROVED BY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO I194 SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS AS AMENDED. CARRIED 4-0. Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Community Development, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen ( 15) days of the date of the decision. RAMON A. DIAZ, SEC4rill PALM DESERT PLANNING C. MISSION RAD/tm PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1194 j A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PRECISE PLAN OF DESIGN TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A 168 UNIT INN AND A FULL SERVICE RESTAURANT AND GAS STATION WITHIN A 10 ACRES IN THE PC (4) S.P. AND PR-5 N, S.P. ZONE AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF HIGHWAY III AND DEEP CANYON ROAD. CASE NO. PP 86-45 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 4th day of November, 1986, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider the request of THOMAS MILLER for the above described project; and WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedure for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act , Resolution No. 80-89, " in that the director of community development has determined that the project will not have a significant environmental impact and a negative declaration is hereby certified; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said planning commission did find the following facts and reasons to exist to justify granting approval of said precise plan: 1 . The design of the precise plan will not substantially depreciate property values in the vicinity. 2. The precise plan will not unreasonably' interfere with the use or enjoyment of property in the vicinity by the occupants thereof for lawful purposes. 3. The precise plan will not endanger the public peace, health, safety or general welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1 . That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the commission in this case; 2. That approval of Precise. Plan 86-45 is hereby granted for reasons subject to the attached conditions. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1194 PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at. a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 16th day of December, 1986, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: DOWNS, RICHARDS, WHITLOCK, AND ERWOOD NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE 5�'/ !RD111' , Chairman ATTEST: RAMON A. DIAZ, Secreta /tm 2 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1194 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO. PP 86-45 Department of Community Development: I . The development of the property shall conform substantially with exhibits on file with the department of community development/planning, as modified by the following conditions. 2. Construction of a portion of said project shall commence within one year from the date of final approval unless an extension of time is granted; otherwise said approval shall become null , void and of no effect whatsoever. 3. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein which are in addition to all municipal ordinances and state and federal statutes now in force, or which hereafter may be in force. 4. Prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contemplated by this approval , the applicant shall first obtain permits and/or clearance from the following agencies: Coachella Valley Water District Palm Desert Architectural Commission City Fire Marshal Public Works Department Palm Desert Water 8 Services District Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to the department of building and safety at the time of issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. 5. The hotel shall provide solid-core or steel doors equipped with dead bolt locks, door viewers and latch guards. 6. The addressing of the rooms should use even numbers to the left and odd numbers to the right to assist emergency vehicles in locating rooms. 7. Access to Highway III must be approved by Caltrans and City of Palm Desert Public Works department. 8. The requested assurances from the developer by the Hidden Palms Homeowners Association will become conditions of approval , and have been expressed as follows: 3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1194 a. That there be no usable balconies on the north side of their property facing toward Hidden Palms. b: A 90 foot setback from the building line to the Hidden Palms wall will be provided on the northern property line. C. That a minimum of two rows of existing date palms remain as a barrier between the Hidden Palms wall and the proposed parking area. d. That additional planting be done under the date palm barrier to a height capable of softening the effect of only seeing the palm tree trunks from Hidden Palms. e. That they prefer tile to be used at the gas station building, rather than metal . f. That no obtrusive lighting be done on the north side to illuminate the hot water building, parking area or planned amenities. g. That the trash enclosure be moved from the northwest corner for noise and odor consideration. 9. Handicap parking stalls shall be distributed appropriately throughout entire site. 10. Detailed parking lot and building lighting plan shall be submitted to staff for approval , subject to applicable lighting standards, plan to be prepared by a qualified lighting engineer. 11 . Three to 3. 5 foot mounding shall be provided to sufficiently screen parking lot areas from streets. 12. Trash provisions shall be approved by applicable trash company and city prior to issuance of building permit. 13. All roof-mounted mechanical equipment shall be screened from all sides with materials similar to building walls. 14. Project shall be subject to art in public places fee per Ordinance No. 473. 15. A parcel map filing shall create parcels to the satisfaction of the director of community development. 16. The architecture of the future restaurant shall be compatible with the hotel . 4 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1194 17. All on-site utilities , including cable television, shall be placed underground and shall be completely concealed from view except certain appurtenances as may be approved by the director of community development. 18. Only delivery diesel trucks built after 1974 shall be used. 19. Ali conditions of the architectural commission shall be met. 20. The precise plan will contain and provide all items delineated in the staff report dated December 16, 1986. 21 . Decorative walls shall be compatible with adjacent developments. 22. Car wash may be operated only between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. 23. The car wash shall also be built so that the door on the north end of the building shall be closed while the car wash is in operation. 24. The service station shall be redesigned to he more compatible with the Residence Inn to reflect the concerns identified by the staff report dated December 16, 1986. 25. The date palms on the site shall be maintained. In the event that a date palm dies or requires removal , it shall be replaced by a tree approved, by city staff. Department of Public Works: 1 . Drainage and signalization fund fees, as required by city ordinance, shall be paid prior to grading permit. issuance. 2. Drainage facilities shall be provided. per Ordinance No. 218 and the Master Drainage Plan, to the specifications of the director of public works. 3. Storm drain construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study by the private engineer that is approved by the department of public works. 4. Full public Improvements, including traffic safety lighting, as required by ordinance and the director of public works, shall be installed in accordance with city standards. 5. Complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the city engineer for checking and approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. The engineer shall submit "as-built" plans prior to the acceptance of the Improvements by the city. 5 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1194 6. All private driveways and parking lots shall be inspected by the engineering department and a standard inspection fee shall be paid prior to grading permit issuance. 7. Landscaping maintenance on Highway III and Deep Canyon Road shall be provided by the property owner. 8. ; Existing utilities on Highway III and Deep Canyon Road shall be undergrounded per each respective utility district's recommendation. If determined to be unfeasible applicant shall agree to participate in any future utility undergrounding district. 9. Traffic safety striping on Highway III and Deep Canyon Road shall be provided to the specifications of the director of public works. A traffic control plan must be submitted to and approved by the director of public works before placing pavement markings. 10. Complete grading plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the director of public works for checking and approval prior to issuance of any permits. II . Dedication of 55/58 feet of right-of-way on Highway III and Deep Canyon shall be done prior to issuance of any permits and approval of plans. 12. Installation of curb and gutter, matching paving and 8 foot meandering sidewalk on Highway III and Deep Canyon Road. 13. Offsite improvement plans to be approved by public works department and a surety posted to guarantee the required offsite improvements prior to grading permit issuance. 14. Installation of one-half landscaped median in Highway III or cash payment for one-half the cost of landscaped median at the option of the director of public works. 15. Traffic analysis to the prepared for the project to address the specific impacts on existing networks (street and intersections) and the proposed mitigation measures recommended for approval by the city. 16. Size, number and location of driveways to public works specifications with only three driveway approaches to be allowed to serve this property. 17. Complete parcel map shall be submitted as required by ordinance to the director of public works for checking and approval and be recorded before issuance of, any permits. 18. Any and all off-site improvements shall be preceded by the approval of 6 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1194 I plans and the issuance of valid encroachment permit(s) by the department of public works. 19. A complete preliminary soils investigation, conducted by a registered soils engineer, shall be submitted to and approved by the department of public works prior to issuance of the grading permit. 20. Access to Highway III shall be restricted through raised medians, to right turn ingress and egress and approved by Caltrans. 21 . A secondary access, 24 feet wide, shall be provided on Deep Canyon Road at the project's north boundary. 22. Applicant shall provide for bus turnout on Highway III to the satisfaction of the director of public works and Sunline Transit Agency. 23. All improvements within the State right-of-way shall be constructed to Caltrans standards. 24. Median islands at both project entrances as shown on the project site plan shall be continuous and extend into driveways far enough to preclude/minimize potential vehicle conflict. 25. If traffic conflicts develop, as determined by the director of public works, at the most southerly driveway on Deep Canyon Road applicant shall modify drive to restrict movements to right turn ingress/egress only. 26. Access driveways shall be a minimum of 24 feet for Highway III entry and Deep Canyon exit, and 18 feet for Highway III exit. and Deep Canyon entry. 27. Existing signal at Deep Canyon and Highway III shall be modified to the satisfaction of both Caltrans and the City of Palm Desert. City Fire Marshal : I . Install a water system capable of delivering 3000 GPM fire flow from any fire hydrant for a three hour duration in addition to domestic supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement. 2. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants so that no point of any building is more than 200 feet from a fire hydrant measured along approved vehicular travel ways. a. exterior surfaces of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow, and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. 7 i . PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1194 b. curbs shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. C. hydrants shall not be located closer than 25 feet to any building. 3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and two copies of the water system plan to the fire marshal for review. Upon approval , one copy will be sent to the building department, and the original 'will be returned to the developer. 4. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and approved by the water company, with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system in Case No. PP 86-45 is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the fire marshal ." 5. Prior to delivery of combustible materials to the building site, the required water system shall be Installed, operating, and delivering the required flow. 6. Additional fire protection requirements may be necessary when the applicant submits specific plans for consideration and approval . 7. All building over 5000 square feet require an approved fire sprinkler system. B. All three story buildings must have a fire marshal approved fire alarm system. 8 cp HAIR DESIGNS t -#- PP 96 - )l5 'N-661 Mon.�_(�W_Q J) e �Pwtd. 4114-.)JJLL 73-725 El Paseo, Suite 21B, Palm Desert, CA 92260 (619) 340-1622 INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM City of Palm Desert T0: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT/PLANNING DATE: FEBRUARY 12, 1987 SUBJECT: PP 86-45 MOBILE GAS STATION APPLICANT: THOMAS MILLER SANDY BAUM 11753 San Vincente P.O. Box 1739 Los Angeles, CA 90049 Palm Desert, CA 92261 The above case was reviewed by council January 8, 1987, with the gas station and car wash portion of the project continued to this date pending a study being completed by the Project Area Committee. 11 Staff has no new material to date and recommends continuance to February 26, 1987. 4 e s �;�.''�t✓ijf RAMON A. DIAZ DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY VELOPMENT/PLANNING RAD/tm off IF lnnn 3. 11D®=<zozr-i2�v 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NOTICE OF ACTION Date: December 3, 1986 Mr. Thomas Miller Mr. Sandy Baum 11753 San Vincente P.O. Box 1739 Los Angeles, CA 90049 Palm Desert, CA 92261 Re:,-'PP 86-45 The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of December 2, 1986. CONTINUED TO DECEMBER 16, 1986. CARRIED 4-0. Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Community Development, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen ( I5) days of the date of the decision. 4TA RAMON A. DIAZ, SECPALM DESERT PLANNIISSION RAD/tm MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION DECEMBER 2, 1986 Mr. Diaz responded that the request was for a duplex split and he felt that it was a minor amendment that could be handled at staff level . Commission concurred. V111 . PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Continued Case No P � THOMAS MILLER, Applicant Request for approval of a negative declaration of environmental impact and a precise plan of design to allow construction of 168 unit inn, a full service restaurant and a gas station on 10 acres in the PC (4) S.P. and PR-5 N, S.P. at the northeast corner of Highway III and Deep Canyon Road. Ms. Sass outlined the five issues that were to be addressed by the applicant as discussed in the staff report. Staff requested a two-week continuance. Mr. Diaz also noted that photos were being sent from Scottsdale and Santa Barbara of the gas station. Chairman Erwood opened the public_ testimony and asked if the applicant wished to address the commission. MR. SANDY BAUM, 45-800 Deep Canyon Road, stated that he was aware of the request for a continuance and had notified all the parties. Commissioner Whitlock asked if the case would go to the architectural commission before the next planning commission meeting. Ms. Sass replied yes. Action: Moved by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner Downs, approving a continuance to December 16, 1986. Carried 4-0. B. Continued Case No. PP/CUP 86-47 - HARRY SCHMITZ, Applicant Request for approval of a negative declaration of environmental impact, precise plan of design and conditional use permit to allow construction of a seven unit senior citizen apartment project located on Santa Rosa Way, east of San Pascual Avenue. 2 INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM City of Palm Desert TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: CATHERINE SASS DATE: DECEMBER 2, 1986 SUBJECT: THOMAS MILLER, PP 86-45 The above continued case was to address five items: 1 . Drainage 2. Grading 3. Noise generation from air conditioning unit placement 4. Noise generation from car wash 5. A unique village-style architecture to the Mobil Station To date items 1 and 2 have been addressed. Item 3 will be addressed by the architectural commission prior to final approval . Item 4 has not been submitted by the applicant. Item 5 has been submitted and will require further modification. Staff was prepared to present a recommendation on this case, however, a new modified site plan was delivered late afternoon November 25. Staff has determined that changes may be sufficient to warrant further study, therefore, recommends this case be continued. CATHERINE SASS ASSISTANT PLANNER CS/tm MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION NOVEMBER 18, 1986 V11 . ORAL COMMUNICATIONS None. Vlll . PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Continued Case No. P THOMAS MILLER, Applicant Request for approval of a negative declaration of environmental impact and a precise plan of design ,ro ,allow construction of 168 unit inn, a full service restaurant and a gas station on 10 acres in the PC (4) S.P. and RR-5 N, S.P. at the northeast corner of Highway III and Deep Canyon Road. Mr. Diaz explained that staff was requesting a two week continuance to study plan revision,. Chairman Crites opened the public testimony and asked if anyone present wished to speak in FAVOR or OPPOSITION to the proposed. MR. JONES, 44-691 Monaco, expressed concern regarding the parking area in the back and the tennis court location. Mr. Sandy Baum, applicant , responded that the tennis court was eliminated in the new plan. Chairman Crites recommended that the applicant and Mr. .Jones get together to discuss the changes. Action: Moved by Commissioner Erwood. seconded by Commissioner Richards, approving a two-week continuance to December 2, 1986. Carried 4-0. B. Continued Case No. PP 86-46 - RICHARD OLIPHANT 6 ASSOCIATES, Applicant Request for apprnval of a roar unit apartment project nn the west side of T. ne scwtherly terminus of Lantana Aveni,e. Mr . Diaz outlined the salient points of the staff report and incicated previous staff concerns had been addressed. Staff recommended approval of the case suoject to the conditions. 2 Matti 17d� STAFF REPORT de5cr PaOr �� 6 PfP PP 86-45 hn Rvc� soviA level FHH expressed ;n clecib�ls DECEMBER 16, 1986 dq`( tl* 1M 1 �1 , ayhR. i�W�. Sound �eVe� off-site sound levels. While it is obvious that the sound levels continue at a descending rate from the source it is important to keep in mind that the actual sound levels can increase again by being combined with other contributing factors such as traffic. The city does not have sound data for Deep Canyon Road or Highway 111 at this time. Available information indicates that the closest residential unit will be a minimum of 100 feet from the noise source. If the graphic is continued at a descending rate of noise levels, the output from the car wash should be approximately 74 Leq. at 100 feet from the entrance of the car wash and 60 Leq. at 100 feet from the north or enclosed side of the car wash. / / To put this information in understandable terms see attached graphic. ) 1 Federal guidelines interpret residential land use as normally acceptable at levels below 65 Ldn, normally unacceptable between 65 and 75 Ldn, and clearly unacceptable above 75 Ldn. The noise output from the car wash can be reduced at the source, in the path of travel or at the receiver. It is unreasonable to create a situation where existing residences would require noise attenuation. Staff feels the car wash will not be modified and, therefore, the only solution is that the path be disturbed by walls and berming to insure �� that off-site noise is attenuated to acceptable levels. The developer CUJ should provide a complete sound study indicating sound levels to 100 feet. 2(U Walls and berming, unless they break the line of sight, are ineffective. The maximum attenuation through barriers is 10 db. ®�o Staff is further concerned that while these levels have been determined ae acceptable in the urban environment, many of the city's residents located �3 here to enjoy the quiet of the desert. Q� V9,16T OFfe 1s`TRPwpiotie F!161�i=m ac--t�ofithemrcar�wagh �i ffi i _ tB y recommend ga i t i t p i s time, VI. ANALYSIS: A. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL OF A PRECISE PLAN: 1 . The design of the precise plan will not substantially depreciate property values nor be materially injurious to properties or C0 improvements in the vicinity. lvo as 5 $% i t" ri I i CITY OF PALM DESERT ry DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT TO: PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: DECEMBER 16, 1986 CASE NO: PP 86-45 REQUEST: Approval of a negative declaration of envirrnmenta' impact and a precise plan of design to allow construction of 168 unit inn, a full service restaurant and a gas station on 10 acres in the PC (4) S.P. and PR-5 N, S.P. at the northeast corner of Highway 111 and Deep Canvon Road. APPLICANT: Thnmas Miller Sunrastle Real Estate 11753 San Vincenre P.O. Box 1739 Los Angeles, CA 90049 Palm Desert. CA 92261 I . BACKGROUND: A. DESCRIPTION OF SITE: The ten acre site is vacant, relatively flat and sloping to the north. There have been no street improvements to date. A date palm grove bounds the north end of the parcels. B. ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE: NORTH: PR-5, N/Hidden Palms SOLi1H: C-t SP/Highway 111 , across highway is commercial EAST: PC (4) N, SP/Embassy Suites hotel WEST: C-1 , SP and R-3 (4) and R- I 13,000/across Deep Canyon Road C. GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION: Resort commercial and medium density residential . H . ZONING STANDARD: Requirement Provision d.u./ac 18 18 perimeter setback (PR-5) 20 ft. 27' min. front setback (PC-4) 30 ft. 30 ft. side setback (PC-4) 15 ft. 21 ' min. parking spaces 275 274 max. bldg. height 30 ft. max. 30 ft. building coverage 50% max. 22% open space 50% min. 57% min. project area 10 acres 10 acres min, building separation 10 ft. 10 ft. STAFF REPORT PP 86-45 DECEMBER 16, 1986 111 . PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A. GENERAL SITE DESIGN: The proposed project consists of three integrated sections. The focus of the project is a 168 unit all suite hotel . The hotel extends over the northern 7 1/2 :acres of the site. Buildings are two-story eight plexes with 504 square foot studios and 828 square foot penthouses. A gas station with "mini-mart" and a car wash takes up approximately one acre of the southwest corner . A full service restaurant (approximately 7000 square feet) is planned on the southeast parcel to provide the required room service. At this time a building pad is provided, with the operator to be secured later . The major amenity focus is tennis with five courts clustered in the renter of the inn's grounds. A formal pool and informal pool , as well as a gate house, are included in the project. Additional visual amenity in the form of fountains and patterned/colored concrete have been added to the original design concept. Fountains will be located along Highway Ill and centered in a median fashion in front of the open space area where the informal pool is located. - B. CIRCULATION, PARKING AND ACCESS: The integration of the three sections of this project is dependent on a good circulation pattern. Access is achieved from Highway III by right hand turn only, and from Deep Canyon Road. Medians and landscaping techniques assist to direct traffic flow. A secondary access to Deep Canyon is provided near the northerly project boundary. The parking requirement is for 1 . 1 space per unit for the inn ( 185 spaces) and 90 spaces for the restaurant. The site plan has provided 178 spaces for the inn and 96 spaces for the restaurant. C. ARCHITECTURE: The applicant has modified a victorian style architecture popular with Residence Inn to reflect a style popular to the desert. The two 2 STAFF REPORT PP 86-45 DECEMBER 16, 1986 story strurtures have ,p•an i sh i nF i uerre of orange t i I e roofs and a ! ight color 9•turc,n . Staff h.3 been cc,nrcrned wirh the appropriatena5s of the arr_hitect:ir,, ! �ty'e, ripe Steep pitch of fhe roof has been reduced anri turther mnciificatior; of the arcnirerturai _rvle including rile accent .and m?S5ion °•tv.p win,lnw5 have created a more acceptable ne� ign. �ra--f F?, '• = the architecture is moving in rnF• right direction and further modif;^arirn5 can be reviewer! et Staff level . The architectural 5tvle of the restaurant and gas station were to be compatible with ant, reflect that of the note! . The gas station submitted a redesign in a "vf : ! age" style which received architectural commission aoprnva! on December 9. 1986. conditioned that one [lay be removed to ad low For The 311' landscape setback on Highway lil and That heavier columns be user; to Support the canopy. . Staff Felt th3T the_ ar,I-i)irect Ural 5ty!e of the gas station would be secured once t!-ie architecture of the hotel was finalized. The q,.iality of architecture pr=•;er.tPd in the rede•; ign does not compare I to that of the hotel and staff feels that more than matching roof materials is required to provide a "village style" and tie the components of this prO ect together. A lot of effort has been expended to achieve an appealing architecture for the hotel and st._Ff wouid like to see that product extended to toe gas station architecture, by further modification including such items as matching the trim and window shape of the Date palms are required Tn or, the predominan- feature_ of the !anoscaoe plan to comply with ciTY ordinance in a natural factors overlay zone. The landscape setback on Highway ill will match that of the neighboring development to the east. providing 413 feet including the meandering sidewalk . The frontage on Deep Canvnn Read will provide for a pedestrian [liciewalk and be landscaped to be compatible with the neighboring development to the nortn now providing 27 feet on this landscape setback. Additional landscaped medians are provided to support traffic cirruiation between the three elements of the proposed precise plan. The submitted redesign has reduced setback provisions but still meets or exceeds rode requirement for the PG-4. A bay has been removed from the gas station. 3 STAFF REPORT PP 86-45 DECEMBER W, 1986. IV. DISCUSSION: The warning corm i sqIn r hpdr A Cps i son I at 9 pi-l-rii it nsac- ir)(j 1936, "he applicant waF oirerren to andrP15 "he rownwing conrprns: mr. rr-�Ter wa-, -i-^: 1�i-n H,,.vrr. A A5sn& 3tt-- �..na "r , -7 -,1xr-rA U." resolve orainage issues. Szows : Mr . Folkers joudino p4nning starf trat 'he p,,joiir works Ocpartmpnt Kepis The urn_ posed mpthoel :if drainage for the site wlli on satisfactory . Air . Fo , kprS further advised that he will be working with Havpr & Awnriarps To address concerns that a proper street aiignment K p,oviavtc stiong Deep Canyon Row at tie inhur vczlon of Wgnway K ! , J. More i,qput rean-cHna cr.p7rg woo 7c, bp suppKeo. concitioned that grane wKi not bp r-sinpd more Tram one foot . Status: Mr . Kauguor ndvisrC pianwng sr&f that grjOing contrcl will be ewrriseo Curing the enginepring design phase. Public works s7nrF wii ; be reviewing engineering drawings to as,t-:rn conformance with current municipal wMins and concerns of adjacent property owners, 3. is noise generation from air wKnoning unit placement would be looked at by the arenirecrui rommisslor. �rarus: Plarnmrn-C wi ; : be reviewed upon Aubmii:rhi er final pian5. 4, A noise generation Sruay or graphic wnulg oe iupplieo regaroing The car waW Aratuq : attached. 5. the )as station should provide a more unique 01fage-styip, architecture. Status : Provided , rerempri architectural m)mmisnion approval December 9, 1986. V. NOISE: A sound study has seen orndnred ny The produrt manufacturer for the gas station' s p-oposed car wash. file graphic supplied was measured at a station in South Gate. California. The gr5phic indicates sound levels on what appears to be the site dimensions, Our interest. in particular, is 4 STAFF REPORT PP 86-45 DECEMBER 16, 1986 off-site Sound levels . Whilo it novinlin -nar [ne ;n%:n, ievi, [- rrnti:-�in at a descending rate frc)m t,ip it jy. Mnr-�JT�ri- TC! 1,PPM ir. 7ir":l rnllr tl 9. i-Tijal :,n ii nrt v L ra.r) in r in,-,i n ny rcmo 1 "r F -uch jc. - 11-v cne, n =Jvr- :,crjn:-j ctA-:j ar,.vor 1_!-)af w v r ;mF. Av.jilaDie inf,ilmarion tn.nt The rineaz r�cic­ r -,i �l -I crapnir un i t w i 1 1 1e ,3 m i n mur, -lu fri �rnm T:i ­ nc is ront ;nupri at a Jenrpnning rat P ­r noise irveic., th" out Put. ftr:,m tnp car wash Should he --,nproyimat-E. ly 74 Ltc. at Ifill FeM: ri-c'm the nnt-' ancl, Of the rar wash and f,Il Leq, at inii feat from the ncrzi) or- PncleSPi­4 sine the i,ar wash. io term, .it tnw; inFrirrr.gt !,jr, in _-e- 5tt .)l_!ncd ,-rapih F-LiF-ral -.-;,j;cjpj inp,, -irer,lrpr re,I 7.denr i a .and iise 95 rir)rma 1 1 , 3crent3hh- ;;� d;, ievf-1 , oprwn( f;; and ann r ear ! v ur•:arrppT.3bie ahove 75 !on. 1-n e noisy' -,titni ol the jt r _)m Cf�p .,3, �a�,n ,.Dn ri-o�jcec at jrce t r),dt') r1r, travel ;r ­'7 the rereivpr . t is urredsrjF)abie TO rrea`e a siruation where -xi nting re- iijenc-.:, would require no;-,o attenuation. Staff ?eels rte car wash will rot be mocified and. therefo E , the dnlv 1 path i -riji-O.0 -1 ing to in,,,ure -irion i - that rhf: p�rh r)e Cll --. . by waiI5 and i:erml That oFf-site noise attpnuated to arreprable IFveis. Thp developer ...nouid provide a -Clmpi�ltt= Sotjnd Sturl'y k dirating Snur:d ltvelS to 10C, Fer2t . anc� riFrming. IJnipgg. -,:Py br.­ak the li,')p "f -light. are ir,P�fPci:ive. Thp m,iximum t),grrip—, ; s "_1 rb. Staff further rt-,r,CPrnec' tnar wii; [p these ieveis navp beet-i a a r ert ereprn�o n th� ijrh,in ,nvir,�nmer�r , merry of: th(, i s P-�, a no-irer! TO en ii the 'It,i-T Cif The rlP5.Pl_t , Scarf Foe IS the qnr,,r.t i a 1 impart or n e Car W FJ 11 i5 su r f i c i ent recommend against its approval at :F11 time. V1 . ANALYSIS: A. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL OF A PPECiSE PLAN: I . The design of the preciSF, plan will not sub°,rantialiv depreciate property values nor be materially lniijri,-jij5 to crontrrit­ or- improvement5 in the vicinity. Chapter 1 Figure 1 Common Sounds Basic Overview of the Basic Theory:Common Sounds in Decibel, (dB) Environmental Noise Problem - Some common,easily recognized sounds are listed below in order of increasing sound intensity levels in decibels.The sound levels shown for occupied rooms are typical general Introduction activity levels only and do not represent criteria for design. Background Examples Decibels(dB). Subjective Definition and Scope of the Noise Evaluations Problem Near jet engine 140 The air around us is constantly filled with sounds,yet most of us would Threshold of pain 730 probably not say we are surrounded by noise.What then is the difference — between ordinary sound and what we —call noise?The traditional definition Threshold of feeling—hard — 120 Deafening of noise is that it is"unwanted rock band sound"Sound becomes unwanted S; when it either interferes with our Accelerating motorcycle at a few feet away �'20 110 normal activities such as sleeping, (Note:50 it from motorcycle equals noise at h n conversation or recreation,when it about 2000 it from a 4-engine jet aircraft.) °no m — Causesactualphysicalharm such as v ° — hearing loss or has adverse effects on Loud auto horn at 10 it away ;y E too mental health.As we have become a m - more urbanized country and as d Veryloud technology has advanced,the level of Noisy urban street O,M 90 sound in our environment has reached Noisy factory — the point when it sometimes does cause interference and does cause School cafeteria wluntreated surfaces 80 physical and psychological harm,and thus we have developed a noise —_ problem.(See Figure 1 for a listing of Loud common sounds.) Stenographic room 70 The dimensions of the noise problem have grown larger and larger —_ over the past few decades.In its 1979 Near freeway auto traffic Range of speech 60 Annual Report,The Council on — Environmental duality stated that — "nearly half the US population is — Moderate regularly exposed to levels of noise Average office 50 that Interfere with...normal activities"and about"1 in 10...are exposed to noises of duration and intensity Soft radio music in apartment 40 Sufficient to cause a permanent —_ reduction in their ability to hear." —_ Average residence without stereo playing 30 Faint Average whisper 20 y.. — Rustle of leaves in wind 10 Very faint Human breathing — - Threshold of audibility 0 -dB are"average"values as measured on the A- ,, scale of a sound-level meter (From Concepts in Architectural Acoustics:M. David Egan,McGraw Hill,1972.) STAFF REPORT PP 86-45 DECEMBER 16, 1986 Justification: The design of the project 5 accew7abir-,. has preliminary approval , and meats 3ppiic3ble code requiremenrs for this type- of facii ,ry. 2. FhP prorlsp pian QH not unreasorabiv interfere with trie use of ano enjoyment of property in the vicinity by the ncrupanTs thereof For lawful purposes, Just ifi rat ion: The surrounding zoning is compatible with the use a, proposed and adjacent owners would not he deprived the use of their land or be negative impacted by toil aevelopment. The pr e( i s t p!an wi is not en,�,arqer the pub t ic peace, health, safety, or general welfare. Justifiraiion: The project is designed in a manner that will not endanger the public peace, health, safety, or general welfare due to compliance with code requirements and compatibility with surrounding properties. B. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The director of community development ha��- determined that the proposed project will not have an adverse impact on the environment and a negative dec ,aration of environmental impact has been prepared. Vil . CONCLUSION: The ,iT:e plan redesigns dated Oecemoec 8. t986, indicate revisions requested by staff. The five concerns stated by planning commission have been addressed. Tne site plan indicates thp project meet, municipal code requirements and is acceptable to staff with removal of the car wash. Therefore, staff recommends: A. Adoption of the findings. B. Adoption of Planning Commission Resolution No. approving PP 86-45, subject to attached conditions. Vill . ATTACHMENT A. Draft resolution. 6 STAFF REPORT PP 86-45 DECEMBER 16, 1986 B. Sound study of Ryko Car Wash. C. Legal notice. D. Negative declaration. E. Exhibits. Prepared by Reviewed and Approved by /tm 7 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PRECISE PLAN OF DESIGN TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A 168 UNIT INN AND A FULL SERVICE RESTAURANT AND GAS STATION WITHIN A 10 ACRES IN THE PC (4) S.P. AND PR-5 N, S.P. ZONE AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF HIGHWAY III AND DEEP CANYON ROAD. CASE NO. PP 86-45 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 4th day of November, 1986, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider the request of THOMAS MILLER for the above described project; and WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedure for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 80-89, " in that the director of community development has determined that the project will not have a significant environmental impact and a negative declaration is hereby certified; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said planning commission did find the following facts and reasons to exist to justify granting approval of said precise plan: 1 . The design of the precise plan will not substantially depreciate property values in the vicinity. 2. The precise plan will not unreasonably interfere with the use or enjoyment of property in the vicinity by the occupants thereof for lawful purposes. 3. The precise plan will not endanger the public peace, health, safety or general welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1 . That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the commission in this case; 2. That approval of Precise Plan 86-45 is hereby granted for reasons subject to the attached conditions. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 16th day of December, 1986, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RICHARD ERWOOD, Chairman ATTEST: R MON A. DIAZ, Secretary /tm c 2 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO. PP 86-45 Department of Community Development: 1 . The development of the property shall conform substantially with exhibits on file with the department of community development/planning, as modified by the following conditions. 2. Construction of a portion of said project shall commence within one year from the date of final approval unless an extension of time is granted; otherwise said approval shall become null , void and of no effect whatsoever. 3. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein which are in addition to all municipal ordinances and state and federal statutes now in force, or which hereafter may be in force. 4. Prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contemplated by this approval , the applicant shall first obtain permits and/or clearance from the following agencies: Coachella Valley Water District Palm Desert Architectural Commission City Fire Marshal Public Works Department Palm Desert Water & Services District Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to the department of building and safety at the time of issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. 5. The hotel shall provide solid-core or steel doors equipped with dead bolt locks, door viewers and latch guards. 6. The addressing of the rooms should use even numbers to the left and odd numbers to the right to assist emergency vehicles in locating rooms. 7. Access to Highway III must be approved by Caltrans and City of Palm Desert Public Works department. 8. The requested assurances from the developer by the Hidden Palms Homeowners Association will become conditions of approval , and have been expressed as follows: 3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. a. That there be no usable balconies on the north side of their property facing toward Hidden Palms. b. A 90 foot setback from the building line to the Hidden Palms wall will be provided on the northern property line. C. That a minimum of two rows of existing date palms remain as a barrier between the Hidden Palms wall and the proposed parking area. d. That additional planting be done under the date palm barrier to a height capable of softening the effect of only seeing the palm tree trunks from Hidden Palms. e. That they prefer tile to be used at the gas station building, rather than metal . f. That no obtrusive lighting be done on the north side to illuminate the hot water building, parking area or planned amenities. g. That the trash enclosure be moved from the northwest corner for noise and odor consideration. 9. Handicap parking stalls shall be distributed appropriately throughout entire site. 10. Detailed parking lot and building lighting plan shall be submitted to staff for approval , subject to applicable lighting standards, plan to be prepared by a qualified lighting engineer. 11 . Three to 3 . 5 foot mounding shall be provided to sufficiently screen parking lot areas from streets. 12. Trash provisions shall be approved by applicable trash company and city prior to issuance of building permit. 13. All roof-mounted mechanical equipment shall be screened from all sides with materials similar to building walls. 14. Project shall be subject to art in public places fee per Ordinance No. 473. 15. A parcel map filing shall create parcels to the satisfaction of the director of community development. 16. The architecture of the future restaurant shall be compatible with the hotel . . a 3 - �rN. c1.7 G off, i bfix OLWOx3a df)DV` ©v► Pam. ©� 6�� C ll�l C Ic�'se c�r; o�enwf►0 K . PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17. All on-site utilities, including cable television, shall be placed underground and shall be completely concealed from view except certain appurtenances as may be approved by the director of community development. 18. Only delivery diesel trucks built after 1974 shall be used. 19. All conditions of the architectural commission shall be met. 20. The precise plan will contain and provide all items delineated in the staff report dated December 16, 1986. 21 . Decorative walls shall be compatible with adjacent developments. Department of Public Works: 1 . Drainage and signalization fund fees, as ,required by city ordinance, shall be paid prior to grading permit issuance. 2. Drainage facilities shall be provided, per Ordinance No. 218 and the Master Drainage Plan, to the specifications of the director of public works. 3. Storm drain construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study by the private engineer that is approved by the department of public works. 4. Full public improvements, including traffic safety lighting, as required by ordinance and the director of public works, shall be installed in accordance with city standards. 5. Complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the city engineer for checking and approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. The engineer shall submit "as-built" plans prior to the acceptance of the improvements by the city. 6. All private driveways and parking lots shall be inspected by the engineering department and a standard inspection fee shall be paid prior to grading permit issuance. 7. Landscaping maintenance on Highway III and Deep Canyon Road shall be provided by the property owner. 8. Existing utilities on Highway III and Deep Canyon Road shall be undergrounded per each respective utility district's recommendation. If determined to be unfeasible applicant shall agree to participate in any future utility undergrounding district. 5 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 9. Traffic safety striping on Highway Ill and Deep Canyon Road shall be provided to the specifications of the director of public works. A traffic control plan must be submitted to and approved by the director of public works before placing pavement markings. 10. Complete grading plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the director of public works for checking and approval prior to issuance of any permits. Ql%P.A C?,,d -ter) ll . edication of 55/58 feet of right-of-way on Highway III shall be done prior to issuance of any permits and approval of plans. 12. Installation of curb and gutter, matching paving and 8 foot meandering sidewalk on Highway III and Deep Canyon Road. 13. Offsite improvement plans to be approved by public works department and a surety posted to guarantee the required offsite improvements prior to grading permit issuance. 14. Installation of one-half landscaped median in Highway 111 or cash payment for one-half the cost of landscaped median at the option of the director of public works. 15. Traffic analysis to the prepared for the project to address the specific impacts on existing networks (street and intersections) and the proposed mitigation measures recommended for approval by the city. 16. Size, number and location of driveways to public works specifications with only three driveway approaches to be allowed to serve this property. 17. Complete parcel map shall be submitted as required by ordinance to the director of public works for checking and approval and be recorded before issuance of any permits. 18. Any and all off-site improvements shall be preceded by the approval of plans and the issuance of valid encroachment permit(s) by the department of public works. 19. A complete preliminary soils investigation, conducted by a registered soils engineer, shall be submitted to and approved by the department of public works prior to issuance of the grading permit. 20. Access to Highway III shall be restricted through raised medians, to right turn ingress and egress and approved by Caltrans. 21 . A secondary access, 24 feet wide, shall be provided on Deep Canyon Road at the project's north boundary. 6 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 22. Applicant shall provide for bus turnout on Highway III to the satisfaction of the director of public works and Sunline Transit Agency. 23. All improvements within the State right-of-way shall be constructed to Caltrans standards. 24. Median Islands at both project entrances as shown on the project site plan shall be continuous and extend into driveways far enough to preclude/minimize potential vehicle conflict. 25. If traffic conflicts develop, as determined by the director of public works, at the most southerly driveway on Deep Canyon Road applicant shall modify drive to restrict movements to right turn ingress/egress only. 26. Access driveways shall be a minimum of 24 feet for Highway III entry and Deep Canyon exit, and 18 feet for Highway III exit and Deep Canyon gntry. Mc�di ieQ' 27. Existing signal at Deep Canyon and Highway III shall be to the satisfaction of both Caltrans and the City of Palm Desert. City Fire Marshal : 1 . Install a water system capable of delivering 3000 GPM fire flow from any fire hydrant for a three hour duration in addition to domestic supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement. 2. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants so that no point of any building is more than 200 feet from a fire hydrant measured along approved vehicular travel ways. a. exterior surfaces of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow, and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. b. curbs shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. C. hydrants shall not be located closer than 25 feet to any building. 3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and two copies of the water system plan to the fire marshal for review. Upon approval , one copy will be sent to the building department, and the original will be returned to the developer. 4. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and approved by the water company, with the following certification: "I 7 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. certify that the design of the water system in Case No. PP 86-45 is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the fire marshal ." 5. Prior to delivery of combustible materials to the building site, the required water system shall be installed, operating, and delivering the required flow. 6. Additional fire protection requirements may be necessary when the applicant submits specific plans for consideration and approval . 7. All building over 5000 square feet require an approved fire sprinkler system. 8. All three story buildings must have a fire marshal approved fire alarm system. 8 COLIA ACOUSTICAL ENGINEERI.—i 206 Rivers de Avenue„ 5f,do Newport Renrh, CA '4213113 (7141 F�31 7:11" L'i-131 December 4, 1985 Mr. Joe Streich Ryko Manufacturing Co. 940 E. Orangethrope, Unit G Anaheim, CA 92801 SUBJECT: Sound Study 'Taken At the Drive-Through Car Wash At Firestone Boulevard and Garfield in South Gate Dear Mr. Streich; At your request I have completed sound level measurements at the drive- through car wash at Firestone Boulevard and Garfield in the City of South Gate. The purpose of the measurements was to evaluate the noise levels emitted during the car wash cycle at various points around the car wash structure. Noise level measurements were made on November 27, 1985, at the existing car wash facility referenced above. Mr. Ken Kimball assisted in the tests by operating the car wash mechanisms. Based on previous tests of similar facilities for Ryko, the greatest noise impact was expected to occur during the dryer cycle. This fact was confirmed at this facility also. Because the cycle represents the highest noise level generation, the test results indicated in this report are from dryer cycle measurements. Measurements were made by running cars through the car wash and recording noise levels of the dryer cycle at positions all around the car wash structure. Figures 1 and 2 show the measurement locations and distance from the structure at each position. The indicated positions are similar to tests previously reported. To expedite the measurements a majority of the noise levels were recorded when the dryer cycle was manually operated to repeat without the washing cycle. The highest noise levels of the dryer cycle occur at the start-up when the blowers are activated. The noise levels then stabilize as the blowers move forward and back over the car in the stall. The duration of the dryer cycle is about one minute and forty seconds. The unique feature of this facility was that it was not a total enclosure. There was a large opening on the west elevation. This opening resulted in higher noise levels at adjacent positions. insbluL) nl Nnis,- Cnnh01 [non m u.e A, o- .....-..... ,e A.... , . L5-131 December 4, 1985 All measurements were made using a Bruel and Kjaer 2230 Precision Integrating Sound Level Meter. The meter was calibrated before and after the measurements. At each measurement position two noise level parameters were recorded . The first was Equivalent Sound Level or Leq . The Leq is the (energy) average noise level of the dryer cycle period. The results of the Leq measurements are shown in Figure 1. The second parameter recorded was peak or maximum (Lmax) . The Lmax is the highest noise level recorded during the dryer cycle. As indicated above the Lmax occurs when the blowers are first activated. The results of these tests are indicated in Figure 2. All measurements were made during breaks of the adjacent roadway traffic. The noise from the traffic was high due to high volumes and a large heavy truck percentage. At the car wash area the background from the traffic noise was measured to be 69.5 dBA Leq. 9 If you have any questions regarding this information please call. /Sincerely; "l Richard olia� Acoustical Engineer lcy) d 40'74 2 30'75 20-71 20-68,7 20-68.7 30�75,7 2e76,5 20,77 10-72 3 10-67 4 10-71,1 IOi77,9 10• 5-75 5-759 \79 1 10' 60 I 50' X 'Sa 768 i0 �70i 20• 77.7 79' 808 10 Entrance Exit 10 'j0 40' SO i ► 86.5 82.9 79.2 78.4 75.2 74 8 7J,5 G C Open r--- II 01 Q o m 10.82 9 5-78.410;79.2 , .4 10-81.5 10-859 10-79.9 20,8t5 2V 778 30`802 20-814 20-822 20'-79.8 y77/_' �30 40,80.3 46'75.3 30-804 ,-j0-797^� 10-78 s0\798 50-/74,2 Building 40-76.6 40-774 50-75 50-75.5 v FIGURE. 1 : Sound Study Taken At Car Wash At Firestone and Garfield in South Cate, CA. Noise Levels Are Indicated As Equivalent Sound Level (Leq) Taken During Dryer Cycle. 1� -_. •.. f14 Wall 30-71 Wall 2 40\78,7 .�ai2 30 20-75.6 20-714 20-73 30,8t 8 20�819 20\H26 10-78,3 10-70 6 10=75,3 10 i82 6 10'86 5-78.6 I 5 80,3 ,y 70' 60' 50' 40 30• 20 10• 0 20 30 40 50 60 70' .-, I I Entrance Exit I I I I I I 3 804 82 i 874 88,4 898 90 95 002 87.1 83.8 83.1 80 78 75.4 Open mi 5�90 86.5 5-82,9 10'"8B 5' d.82.8 10—86,7 10-90,9 10—aS.d 20\87.2 20 i83 30'�85,4 20-872 20-89,5 20-91 30807 40`85.3 30-86.9 30-88.1 30-84,9 4Oi78;7 84.6 S0v75 Building 40-85,3 10-84,3 SO-80.7 50-8Q8 i FIGURE 2: Sound Study Taken At Car Wash At Firestone and Garfield in South Gate, CA. Noise Levels Are Indicated As Peak Levels ([.max) Taken During Dryer Cycle. _ I -m 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE.PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 October 10, 1986 CITY OF PALM DESERT .. LEGAL NOTICE CASE NO. PP 66-45 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by THOMAS MILLER for RESIDENCE INN to construct a 168 unit Inn, a restaurant and a gas station on the north- east corner of Highway III and Deep Canyon Road, also described as: APN 625-100-004, 006, 015, 016 021, 022 J. Vol- ®IIJI IjJ111.11 Li']J 1A I lI II II lIf11))I I .I ,.P. III ;j� r'Tn'�5��� C`•-� JJJ1L1:1'_1J 9.0 1 S.0 r, ■ 9.0 P.R.-G•R �;P,•P.-!, N;1 (l2"#- -2 9 FH Iriv a2 )ir. R 2 R-1 p 1 H 2 5 P R-J Rrl er0 p.l P 1 P 1 I 1 Q fin 6. ] 0 13r HR S N RJ I<1 � 11 I�Iu, �•E 19I,; EC.III,N� � C-I•SP. 9.P.' 1 Tf lI Q kF AA ♦ -9s �C 1,9Pi C I,i N. Q.,•SP l'2y�O,P. CC 9p , <_I,9.P. [p. C P 10P II.72P 1, I C I LP.q V:I6 R lNl F.R 6 RJ 131 31 )11 p]111 R J'2g0001J1 P']I]I q. �� 3 1]I o.nOil R-J IJ`00 131 R J I]n00 131 b'0� PI p-I 12.000 oee _ Rp31 ,P'I' R 1 p�OW .. •- ••PIR l R-120000 P-I IR,000 IP 1 �, q-1 RI PCUP Q-1 I m 1 RI � P Pc 1 Rrl 20,000-' P 120,000 1\ R I P 1 - R I a 1 to voQ. • lr R-I R-1 PI flIMC00; -. R 1. SP P-JIII ®'®.� pIIOCJO" fll R. PI plP Rll p.1 '. QP - b rxo„P wau nr.uun O.S. SAID public hearing will be held on Tuesday, November 4, 1986 at 7:00 p.m. In the Council Chamber at the Palm Desert City Hall , 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all Interested persons are Invited to attend and be heard. If you challenge the proposed actions In court, you may be I Imlted to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the pub] Ic hearing described In this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the city council (or planning commission) at, or prior to, the pdb] ic hearing. PUBLISH: Desert Post RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary zon gp,; _.,_,_.I- cUfLc�� off IFIEn nD(&=®n0-QV 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 I Pursuant to Title 14, Division 6, Article 7, Section 15083, of the California Administrative Code. NEGATIVE DECLARATION CASE NO: PP 86-45, RESIDENCE INN APPLICANT/PROJECT SPONSOR: THOMAS MILLER 11753 San Vincente Los Angeles, CA 90049 PROJECT DESCRIPTION/LOCATION: 168 unit inn, a full service restaurant and gas station on 10 acres in PC (4) S.P. and PR-5, N, S.P. at the northeast corner . of Highway III and Deep Canyon Road. The Director of the Department of Community Development, City of Palm Desert, California, has found that the described project will not have a significant effect on the environment. A copy of the Initial Study has been attached to document the reasons in support of this finding. Mitigation measures, if any, included in the project to avoid potentially significant effects, may also be found attached. ---------------------------------------- RAMON A. DIAZ DATE DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT /tm i NOTICE OF DETERMINATION Negative Declaration TO: (X) Clerk of the Board of Supervisors ( ) Secretary for Resources County of Riverside 1416 Ninth St. , Rm 1311 40BO Lemon Street Sacramento, CA 95814 Riverside, CA 92502 FROM: CITY OF PALM DESERT 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 SUBJECT: Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108 or 21152 of the Public Resources Code. Project Title/Common Name: Residence Inn/Mobil Gas, PP 86-45 Date of Project Approval : February 26, 1987 State Clearinghouse Number ( if submitted) : N/A Contact Person: Catherine Sass Project Location: Northeast corner of Highway III and Deep Canyon Road. Project Description: Ten acre hotel , restaurant and gas station. This is to advise that the City of Palm Desert has made the following determinations regarding the above described project: 1 . The project ( ) will , (X) will not, have a significant effect on the environment. 2. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared in connection with this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. X A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. A copy of the Negative Declaration may be examined at the above city hall address. 3. Mitigation measures (X) were, ( ) were not, made a condition of the approval of the project. 4. A statement of Overriding Considerations ( ) was, (X) was not, adopted for this project. o oi.Va1�S1� Signature Title Date Received for Filing Please return date-stamped copy in the enclosed envelope. l\ casE vo. +MIROMHE`TAL SERVICES DEPT. INITIAL STUDY ENVIRO`UE.-LITAL EVALUATI02I CHECKLIST NOTE: The availability of data necessary to address the topics listed below shall form the basis of a decision as to whether the application is considered complete for purposes of environmental assessment. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers , Possible mitigation measures and comments are provided on attached sheets ) . Yes Maybe No 1 . Earth. Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? b. Disruptions , displacements , compaction, or overcovering of the soil ? c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? d. The destruction , covering , or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils , either on or off the site? 2. Air. Will the proposal result in : a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality?, b. The creation of objectionable odors? _ c. Alteration of air movement, moisture , or temperature , or any change in climate , either locally or regionally? i • 1. Zt Yes Maybe No 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: a,. Changes . in currents , 'or the course or 1 direction of water' movements? b. Changes in-absorption rates , drainage Patterns, or the rate and- amoilnt of surface water runoff? C. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? d. Alteration of -the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? e. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or with- I drawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? f. Reduction in the amount of water other- wise available for public water supplies? 4. Plan_ t_ e. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of plants (including trees , shrubs , grass and crops )7 b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique , rare, Or endangered species of plants? C. Introduction of new species of plants into an area , or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? S. Animal. Life. Will the proposal result a. Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds land anim als including reptiles , or insects )? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique , rare, or endangered species of animals? X` C. Introduction of new species of animals, T into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration to existing .vildlife habitat ? 3. Yes M�be Plo 6. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in .•.the rate of use of any natural resources? b. Depletion of any non-renewable natural resource? 7. EnergY. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? _ b. Demand upon existing sources of energy, or re- quire the-development of new sources of energy? 8. Risk oT f_ Upset. . Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of , hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, pesticides , oil chemicals , or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? . 9. E--onom_ i_ ' Loss. Will the proposal result in: a. A change in the value of property and improvements endangered by flooding? b. A change in the value of property and K impro•,ements exposed to geologic hazards beyond accepted community risk standards? 10. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels to the point at which accepted community noise and vibration levels are exceeded? li . Land Use. Will the proposal result in the a t-1 era on of the present developed or planned land use of an area? 12. Coen Soace. Will the proposal lead to a decrease in the :xmount of designated open space? 13. Population. Will the proposal result in: a. Alteraticn or the location, distribution , density, or growth rate of the human Population of the Citv? b. Change in the population distribution by age , income , religion , racial , or ethnic group, occupational class , household type? _ — 4. ` Yes Maybe No 14. Emoloyment. Will the proposal result in additions new the jobs provided, or a change in the number and per cent employed , unemployed, and underemployed? IS. Housing. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in number and per cent of housing units by type (price or rent range, zoning category owner-occupied And rental , .etc. ) relative to demand or to number of families in various income classes in the City? _ b. Impacts on existing housing or creation of a demand for additional housing? 16. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal resu t tn: a. Generation of additional vehicular movement? _ b. Effects on existing parking facilities , or demand for new parking? c. Impact upon existing transportation systems? d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or mcvement of people and/or goods? (X� e. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , T bicyclists , or pedestrians? _ — 17 . Public Services . Will the proposal have an effect upon , or result in a need for, new or altered governmental services in any of the following a.reis: a. Fire protection? _ b. Police protection? C. Schools ? d. Parks or other recreational facilities ? e. Maintenance of public facilities , including roads? f. Other governmental services? Yes Maybe No ' 18. Public Fiscal Balance. Will the proposal result in a net change in government fiscal flow (revenues less operating expenditures and annualized capital expenditures)? 19. utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems , or alterations to the following utilities: r a. Power or natural gas? b. Communications system? C. Water? — -L d. Sewer or septic tanks? T e. Storm water drainage? f. Solid waste and disposal ? 20. Human Will the proposal result in: a. The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? b. A change in the level of community health care provided? 21 . Social Ser�iCes . Will the proposal result in an increased demand for provision of general social services? 22. Aesthetics . Will the proposal result in: a. Obstruction of any scenic vista. or view open to the public? b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? C. Lessening of the overall neighborhood (or area ) attractiveness , pleasantness , and uniqueness? 23. Licht and Glare new . Will the proposal produce tght or glare? 24. Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal resu t in an a teration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure , object, or building? l 6. Yes Maybe No 25. Mandatory Findings of Sioni`Picance. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment or to curtail the diversity in the environment? b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future. ) c. Does the project have impacts which are indi- vidually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small , but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant. ) d. Does the project have environmental effects L which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings , either directly or indirectly? Initial Study Prepared By: December 11 , 1986 City of Palm Desert Planning Commission Mr . Ray Diaz 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert , Ca. 92260 RE : DEVELOPMENT AT DEEP CANYON and HIGHWAY 111 Dear Mr. Diaz : We are residents of 44-469 Sorrento Court in Hidden Palms and are aware of the new project proposed for the above mentioned corner. The project proposed is well designed and coordinated for the usage of that corner and in our opinion will add as a whole to the complete Hidden Palms Community . We are in favor of this project as proposed and hope that the commission will also be in favor at this time . Sincerely, ,^ � vv RRAINE B. SPE R ec aJrULW � DEC 16 1986 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Xf N N i N c— fITY OF PALM DESERT IT r� a ^mac= aWN« � N �� y3o9 0/%sc, 41v T r S�'v �c=mac=L Y yQ/1/ yo`i N DEC 1 61986 CDMMUNICTMDEVELOPMENI NNTM"ENT � � 6MW\Gn'y i' 1w KEN DEB STENDELL 1� 44675 MONACO CIRCLE 86 19 PALM DESERT, CA 92260 v cD'nry 19 Clry OF p � t�1P;; AU) 0E£EgT iL!ll OCTOBER 30, 1986 CITY OF PALM DESERT PLANNING DEPT. 73510 FRED WARING DR. PALM DESERT, CA 92260 ATTN: MR. RAY DIAZ DEAR MR. DIAZ, I AM A RESIDENT IN THE HIDDEN PALMS COMMUNITY. EVEN THOUGH OUR ASSOCIATION HAS WRITTEN WITH THEIR CONCERNS OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ON THE NORTH EAST CORNER OF HIGHWAY 111 & DEEP CANYON, THEY NEVER CONTACTED MY WIFE OR MYSELF WITH RESPECT TO THIS PROJECT. WE DO AGREE WITH THEIR CONCERNS AND WOULD LIKE TO ADD TO THEM. THE FOLLOWING ARE IN ADDITION TO THOSE STATED BY THE HIDDEN PALMS H. O. A. NO 1 , IS THERE A ZONING CHANGE FROM PR-5, AND IS A 2 STORY BUILDING ALLOWED UNDER THE CURRENT ZONE? ye.s 50 I _� 2. WHAT WILL THE DESIGN ELEVATION BE ALONG THE EAST WEST jjjSQ�1' 13v' BLOCK WALL AT THE REAR OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT, WE WOULD LIKE �J'l TO SEE THE GRADE LOWERED SUFFICIENTLY TO MAXIMIZE OUR PRIVACY? 3. WE WOULD LIKE THE H. O. A. TO BE CONTACTED WHEN THE DEVELOPER REQUESTS THE CITY TO RELEASE IMPROVEMENT BONDS. THE REASON FOR THIS REQUEST IS THAT WHEN THE GRANADA ROYALE WAS BUILT THE BUILDER NEGLECTED TO COMPLETE IMPROVEMENTS THAT WERE A CONDITION OF APPROVAL. 4. WE ALSO FEEL THAT THE PLACEMENT OF TRASH ENCLOSURES SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED IN THE PROPOSED 124' SET BACK. 5. WITH THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY ALONG OUR PROPERTY LINE THE BUILDINGS AND STORAGE OF MATERIALS WILL HELP MAKE ACCESS OVER OUR FENCE EASIER AND COULD ALLOW A HIGHER CRIME RATE. WE WOULD LIKE TO REQUEST SOME ADDED SECURITY. 6. PLEASE DO NOT ALLOW ANY EQUIPMENT ALONG THE COMMON PROPERTY LINE i. e. BOILERS, EVAPORATERS, A/C UNITS. WE DO PLAN ON ATTENDING THE PUBLIC HEARING AND HOPE THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION WILL TAKE THESE CONCERNS INTO CONSIDERATION WHEN REVIEWING THE DEVELOPERS REQUEST FOR APPROVAL. THANK YOU FOR TAKING THE TIME TO REVIEW OUR CONCERNS, AND WE LOOK FORWARD TO SEEING YOU AT THE HEARING. SINC ELY PHGPERTY MANAGEMENT, INC. (619) 340 4184 24 Hr. 73-260 El Paseo, Suite 3A, Palm Desert, CA 92260 October 24 , 1986 Mr. Ramon A. Diaz , Secretary 1J "L�� Ails?it) Palm Desert Planning Commission City of Palm Desert OCT 2 9 73-510 Fred Waring Drive 1986 Palm Desert, California 92260 COMMUNii'! DEVELOPMENT GEPoIRTM"tiJi CITY Of.PALM DESERT RE: PP 86-45 Dear Mr. Diaz : A presentation was made to the Board of Directors of Hidden Palms Homeowners Association by the developers of the planned Inn, restaurant and gas station at the corner of Highway 111 and Deep Canyon Road. The Board of Directors has no objection to the basic concept but would like the following assurances from the developer kept in mind if permission to build is granted. 1. That there be no usable balconies on the North side of their property facing towatridHidden Palms . 2 . Confirmation of the �C( footA set back from the building line to the Hidden Palms wall. Dlv 3. That a minimum of two rows oexisting Gate palms remain as barrier between the Hidden Palms wall and the proposed parki area. Ie it Qe; � �M„ 4 . That additional planting be done er the date palm barrier to a height capable of softening the effect of only seeing th palm tree trunks from Hidden Palms . 5 . That they prefer tile to be used at the gas station building, rather than metal. 6 . That no obtrusive lighting be done on the North side to illuminate the hot water building, parking area or planned amenities . 7 . That the trash enclosure be moved from the Northwest corner for noise and odor consideration. All of the above requests are to help those residents of Hidden Palms along the back wall of the proposed development to maintain the quiet enjoyment of their property. Si erely, Dick Smart, President HIDDEN PALMS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION Regional Offices Irvine • Rancho Cucamonga • San Clemente . Brentwood South Bay • Downtown Los Angeles • Palm Desert • La Jolla r 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (019) 346-0611 December 15, 1986 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION ACTION CASE NO: 317 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): THOMAS MILLER, 11753 San Vicente, Los Angeles, CA 90049. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Redesign approval per architectural commission preliminary approval of 10/14/86. LOCATION: Highway Ill at Deep Canyon. I ZONE: PC (4) and PR-5 ryo�-, — 0h----------------------------------------------------------------- Upon reviewing the submitted plans and presentations by staff and by the applicant, the architectural commission granted preliminary approval subject to conditions. Date of Action: December 9, 1986 Vote: Carried 3-1 (Commissioner Martin opposed) (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen ( 15) days of the date of the decision. ) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ STAFF COMMENTS: Please read the attached minutes. 1 73-510 FROOETV/D WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 December 15, 1986 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION ACTION CASE NO• 317 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) : THOMAS MILLER, 11753 San Vicente, Los Angeles, CA 90049. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Redesign approval per architectural commission preliminary approval of 10/14/86. LOCATION: Highway Ill at Deep Canyon. ZONE: PC (4) and PR-5 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ RESIDENCE INN Upon reviewing the submitted plans and presentations by staff and by the applicant, the architectural commission granted preliminary approval subject to conditions. Date of Action: December 9, 1986 Vote: Carried 4-0 (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen ( 15) days of the date of the decision. ) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ STAFF COMMENTS: Please read the attached minutes. MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION DECEMBER 9, 1986 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of awning as installed. LOCATION: 73-405 El Paseo ZONE: C-1 S.P. Mr. Smith explained that the proposed awning has been installed without a permit. Although the applicant did have approval from the architectural commission the awning seems to have not been installed as approved. Commissioner Martin could not recall how they intended the proposed awning to be attached to the building at the time of approval . Commission had questioned whether this was an awning or a cloth sign. Commissioner Drury had no problem with the awning. She felt the approval and plans did not indicate exactly how the awning was to be attached to the building therefore it was not attached incorrectly. It was suggested that the commissioners review the awning as installed on-site. It was moved by Commissioner Drury, seconded by Commissioner McCrea to continue this case. Carried 4-0 3. CASE NO: 317 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) : THOMAS MILLER, 11753 San Vicente, Los Angeles; CA 90049. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Redesign approval per architectural commission preliminary approval of 10/14/86. LOCATION: Highway 111 at Deep Canyon. ZONE: PC (4) and PR-5 RESIDENCE INN Ms . Sass explained that the applicant has made revisions and submitted additional plans that were requested by the commission. She indicated that the architecture had changed. Commissioner Martin felt that they needed to have the same architect for the gas station and the hotel . 3 MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION DECEMBER 9, 1986 Ms. Sass indicated that planning commission required a village style gas station. She noted that since the architecture of the hotel had changed the gas station architecture did not compliment the hotel . Commissioner Martin inquired as to the west elevation curb area in regard to berming and landscaping. He was concerned with the view of the cars in the parking area from Deep Canyon. Mr. Baum explained that the driveway slopes down and with the provided berming and landscaping there will be adequate screening. Chairman Gregory indicated that the landscape plan was conceptual only and felt the planting should be up-sized. Commissioner Drury was satisfied with the roof pitch but did have concerns with the berming and wall details. It was moved by Commissioner Drurv, seconded by Commissioner Martin to grant preliminary approval subject to the following conditions. 1 . Color and tile samples to be submitted for review. 2. Maximum height to the 30 feet. 3. Final drawings detailing the berming and grading of the north and east elevations to be provided. 4. Review of berming and walls around perimeter of project. Motion carried 4-0. MOBIL STATION Mr. Baum indicated that planning commission was opposed to the industrial design therefore the following submittal is based on their request. Mr. Flood, architect, explained that planning commission wanted a design that would be compatible with the hotel . He felt that the materials to be used were compatible with materials used locally. He noted that the tile and landscape plan would be submitted with the hotel so that they may be compatible. Chairman Gregory suggested that the ends of the canopy be closed in to provide a more village style. 4 i MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION DECEMBER 9, 1986 Commissioner Martin felt that the proposal was no where near village style. He noted -that the structure looked heavy on the small columns. He indicated that if the station was going to be village it should be completely village. He had no problem with the car wash. He felt the canopy structure had to have some tie in with the village style and the mini market needed some detail . Commissioner Drury felt that making the station totally village style would make it appear busy and would be impractical for the use. She thought it had enough of the village style and still appears clean. Chairman Gregory indicated that he would prefer to see the columns larger and noted that the closing of the ends of the canopy were not necessary, it was only a suggestion. It was moved by Commissioner Drury, seconded by Commissioner McCrea to grant preliminary approval subject to the condition that the columns be larger. Carried 3-1 (Commissioner Martin opposed) . 4. CASE NO: 297 MF APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) : L & T DEVELOPMENT, 74-133 E1 Paseo, Suite 9, Palm Desert, CA 92260. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Final approval of 20 unit senior citizen apartment project. LOCATION: Southwest corner of Catalina Way and San Carlos Avenue. ZONE: R-2 5.0. Chairman Gregory outlined his concerns with landscaping in writing. Commission noted that the submitted plans were not prepared by a licensed architect or engineer as required. Therefore, It was moved by Commissioner Drury, seconded by Commissioner Martin to continue this case. Carried 4-0 B. Preliminary Plans: 1. CASE NO: TT 22111 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) : BIRTCHER MESA VIEW, 73-080 E1 Paseo, Suite 101, Palm Desert, CA 92260. 5 Ryko Manufacturing Company • 940 E. Orangethorpe Avenue, Unit G • Anaheim, California 92801 • (714)441-0633 December 4, 1986 City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Dr. Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 Planning Department - Case N PP86-45 Attn: Steven Smith. Dear Mr. Smith, Jim Huntsberry from the Mobil Oil Co. contacted me today and asked if I could send you a sound study on the Ryko car wash system. So I have enclosed a copy of a sound study done on the Ryko R7B Mini-Tunnel . I have also enclosed a piece of literature so you can better understand the type of equipment that we service and sell to the Mobil Oil Co. If you would like to see this piece of equipment we have one e located at the corner of Date Palm and Ramon in Cathedral City. If you have any questions regarding the equipment or the study please feel free to call me. 1 can be reached at (714) 441-0633. U o Thank You Very Much, J Ken Kimball o So. Ca. Service Manager TO A. C� a9 The Finest Vehicle Wash Systems C__IA ACOUSTICAL ENGINEERING 206 Riverside Avenue, Swie E. Newport Beach, CA 92rM l7141 631-731 j December 4, 1985 Mr. Joe Streich Ryko Manufacturing Co. 940 E. Orangethrope, Unit G Anaheim, CA 92801 SUBJECT: Sound Study Taken At the Drive-Through Car Wash At Firestone Boulevard and Garfield in South Gate Dear Mr. Streich; At your request I have completed sound level measurements at the drive- through car wash at Firestone Boulevard and Garfield in the City of South Gate. The purpose of the measurements was to evaluate the noise levels emitted during the car wash cycle at various points around the car wash structure. Noise level measurements were made on November 27, 1985, at the existing car wash facility referenced above. Mr. Ken Kimball assisted in the tests by operating the car wash mechanisms. Based on previous tests of similar facilities for Ryko, the greatest noise impact was expected to occur during the dryer cycle. This fact was confirmed at this facility also. Because the cycle represents the highest noise level generation, the test results indicated in this report are from dryer cycle measurements. Measurements were made by running cars through the car wash and recording noise levels of the dryer cycle at positions all around the car wash structure. Figures 1 and 2 show the measurement locations and distance from the structure at each position. The indicated positions are similar to tests previously reported. To expedite the measurements a majority of the noise levels were recorded when the dryer cycle was manually operated to repeat without the washing cycle. The highest noise levels of the dryer cycle occur at the start-up when the blowers are activated. The noise levels then stabilize as the blowers move forward and back over the car in the stall. The duration of the dryer cycle is about one minute and forty seconds. The unique feature of this facility was that it was not a total enclosure. There was a large opening on the west elevation. This opening resulted in higher noise levels at adjacent positions. Instwt., nl N,.,.. Coil roi E...... nnq .1i Sr,. r. 11 n.... ..... L5-131 December 4, 1985 All measurements were made using a Bruel and Kjaer 2230 Precision Integrating Sound Level Meter. The meter was calibrated before and after . the measurements. At each measurement position two noise level parameters were recorded. The first was Equivalent Sound Level or Leq . The Leq is the (energy) average noise level of the dryer cycle period. The results of the Leq measurements are shown in Figure 1 . The second parameter recorded was peak or maximum (Lmax) . The Lmax is the highest noise level recorded during the dryer cycle. As indicated above the Lmax occurs when the blowers are first activated. The results of these tests are indicated in Figure 2. All measurements were made during breaks of the adjacent roadway traffic. The noise from the traffic was high due to high volumes and a large heavy truck percentage. At the car wash area the background from the traffic noise was measured to be 69.5 dBA Leq. If you have any questions regarding this information please call. Sincerely; ^ 1 Richard Acoustical Engineer �— 30-67,71 40"742 30"15 20-71 20-68.7 20-68.7 3175,7 2e76.5 20 77 10-723 10-67,4 10-71,1 , 10i77,9 10� 5-75 5-759 79 70' 60 50 ' p' 3 V l0 10 i° 10' 20' 30' 40' 50' 77.7 79 80.8 83.2 852 89 Entrance --� Exit 1 1 1 60 70 Q} ,�VV�IPP 86.5 82,9 79.2 78.4 75.2 74.8 )4.5 Open MA ?I Q�k Id, 5-78.4 82 9 ip i79.2 Q-1 10-81.5 10-85 9 20�815 zP77.8 70`00' 702 20-814 20-822 20-79.8 ,77 40 803 30-80.4 30-797 30-78 46'75.3 50�79 B SOi 74,2 Building 40'-768 40'—T74 50-75 56-75.5 FIGURE. 1 : Sound Study Taken At Car Wash At Firestone and Garfield in South Gate, CA. Noise Levels Are Indicated As Equivalent Sound Level (Leq) Taken During Dryer Cycle. Cry ( Il 4 Wall Wall ]0-7t,2 40,76,7 .�81 2 30 20-75.6 20-714 20-73 30'\81a 8l9 20 20 826 10-76,3 10-70 6 10=75,3 10�82 6 ,I 10�86 5-78,6 5 80,3 ,y 70 60' 50' 40 30 20 10 0 20 70 40 50 60 10' c~0 804 8I I I I Entrance Exit I 1 3 87.4 884 898 90 95 002 87.1 83.8 831 80 78 75-1 Open Mai 5\90 5; es 5 5-82,8 .10�88 0i82.8 10-86.7 10-K9 10-85,d 20\87.2 20183 30\854 20-872 26-89.5 20-91 70 807 40\853 30-86.9 30-88.1 30-84,9 46/78.7 SO,Ba 6 50i75 Building 40-853 40-84,3 50-80.7 50-80,8 FIGURE 2: Sound Study Taken At Car Wash At Firestone and Garfield in South Gate, CA. Noise Levels Are Indicated As Peak Levels (I.max) Taken During Dryer Cycle. /AA RYKOwash Systems — Mini-Tunnel g f i Washes.. Waxes, and Drys— A Clean Victory RYKO Mini-Tunnel is the ultimate TOTAL SYSTEM excess water away— all without "all-in-one" vehicle cleaning system The automatic, self-contained touching vehicle surfaces) Each ve- on the market today—able to Mini-Tunnel thoroughly washes, hicle is completely washed, waxed wash, wax, and dry vehicles in a 32 waxes and drys vehicles of all sizes and dried — automatically— with- foot building or less] — from the smallest imports to vans. out an attendant) The result of over a decade of en- gineering design and testing, this at- COMPLETELY WASH UP TO 50 VEHICLES AN tractively styled and easy to main- HOUR, OR WASH, WAX, AND DRY UP tain machine combines super effi- AUTOMATIC ! TO 20 VEHICLES AN HOUR WITH THE ciency, speed, and economy with Seven big, soft brushes gently RYKO MINI-TUNNEU customer satisfaction. scrub the vehicle, rinsing dirt and CUSTOMIZED CLEANING Take that "extra edge" over your grime down the drain and applying competitors by offering additional wax. Next, the two specially engi- Mini-Tunnel has four cycle pro- services. neered, high velocity fans "blow" grams to cover a complete range of A Complete System In w Limited Space — The Key To Success washing and drying requirements. are 32 ft. or lessi Easily fits in most From the fast and thorough single existing bays wash cycle for normally dirty vehi- • No troublesome and leaky hy- cies, to the extra cleaning of the draulic or oil systems double wash for the dirtiest cars. A ® • Easy access to all components for drying cycle can be chosen with _ routine maintenance and repair either wash cycle selection. • High velocity dryer fans "push" Tailor Mini-Tunnel to your specific O excess water from vehicle surfaces volume and customer cleaning without touching the vehicle needs. I I C9l • Available in 50 or 60 cycle for do- mestic or international installation SIMPLE DESIGN • Quiet operation —meets all OSHA The key to Mini-Tunnel's success is - noise requirements simplicity. The all-aluminum frame resists rust and corrosion to remain Mini-Tunnel attractive and operating properly. AUTOMATIC ATTENDANT accepts SPECIFICATIONS: Mini-Tunnel operates on only water, coins, tokens, and code numbers air and electricity, there are no hy- to activate MINI-TUNNEL. Length 12 ft,6 in draulic or oil systems to be affected Width 12 ft,6 in by leaks or temperature changes. space, saving the cost of more ex- Height 9 ft, I 1 in tensive and complicated systems. Weight 3,290lb Rugged construction and quality Construction costs are also less components make routine mainni- Service Requirements: Hance or repair fast and easy. Mini- because Mini-Tunnel easily fits into Tunnel really lives up to RYKO's rep- locations that previously could ac- Air: 100 PSI at 3.0 CFM utation for reliabilityl commodate only a wash system. Water: 20 GPM at 40 PSI Mini-Tunnel is economical, tool Electric: 3phase- The two specially engineered ten NATIONWIDE NETWORK 200/230 V,90 amp HP fans cost less to operate, but RYKO has a national network of 460 V,40 amp provide the same efficiency as dry- Sales and Service Centers that assure 575 V,35 amp ers with far more horsepower. you of the highest standards, Recommended Bay whether you need assistance with Requirements: TOTAL VERSATILITY1 your site selection, layout, or service RYKO Mini-Tunnel is the most ver- after the sale. Length 32.0 ft(9.75M) satile wash/wax/dry system in the RYKO Mini-Tunnel Width 13.S ft(4.1 M) industry. The merchandising con- Standard Features. . . Height 11.0 ft(3.35M) cepts and capabilities of Mini-Tunnel are virtually unlimited. Mini-Tunnel • Self-contained. . .a totally com- For smaller bay dimensions, con- is ideal for service stations, rental plete vehicle washidry system tact your RYKO Representative. agency fleets, auto dealerships, and • All-aluminum frame and fan con- private investors. struction For additional information, call Mini-Tunnel offers a complete ve- is Requires minimal space for opera- your local RYKO Sales and Service hicle cleaning system in a limited tion — building size requirements Center. �WXA`w' RYKO Manufacturing Company W 11600 NW 54th Ave. • Grimes, Iowa 50111 • (515)986-3700• TWX910520-2546 TM RYKO Manufecturing Co.reserves the right to revise specifications,features or design without notice or owQatlon. 4185 10M 14483-001 f RYKOwash Systems — Mini-Tunnel I � N i sit it fti4 Washes, Waxes, and Drys— A Clean Victory RYKO Mini-Tunnel is the ultimate TOTAL SYSTEM excess water away— all without "all-in-one" vehicle cleaning system The automatic, self-contained touching vehicle surfacesl Each ve- on the market today—able to Mini-Tunnel thoroughly washes, hicle is completely washed, waxed wash, wax, and dry vehicles in a 32 waxes and drys vehicles of all sizes and dried— automatically— with- foot building or less) — from the smallest imports to vans. out an attendantl The result of over a decade of en- gineering design and testing, this at- COMPLETELY WASH UP TO 50 VEHICLES AN tractively styled and easy to main- HOUR, OR WASH, WAX, AND DRY UP tain machine combines super effi- AUTOMATIC I TO 20 VEHICLES AN HOUR WITH THE ciency, speed, and economy with Seven big, soft brushes gently RYKO MINI-TUNNELI customer satisfaction. scrub the vehicle, rinsing dirt and CUSTOMIZED CLEANING Take that '"extra edge" over your grime down the drain and applying competitors by offering additional wax. Next, the two specially engi- Mini-Tunnel has four cycle pro- services. neered, high velocity fans "blow" grams to cover a complete range of A Complete System In w Limited Space — The Key To Success washing and drying requirements. _ _ are 32 ft. or Iessl Easily fits in most From the fast and thorough single existing bays wash cycle for normally dirty vehi- • No troublesome and leaky hy- cles, to the extra cleaning of the draulic or oil systems double wash for the dirtiest cars. A is Easy access to all components for drying cycle can be chosen with — routine maintenance and repair either wash cycle selection. is High velocity dryer fans "push" Tailor Mini-Tunnel to your specific I excess water from vehicle surfaces volume and customer cleaning 1 without touching the vehicle needs. is Available in 50 or 60 cycle for do- mestic or international installation SIMPLE DESIGN — — is Quiet operation — meets all OSHA The key to Mini-Tunnel's success is noise requirements simplicity. The all-aluminum frame resists rust and corrosion to remain Mini-Tunnel attractive and operating properly. AUTOMATIC ATTENDANT accepts SPECIFICATIONS: Mini-Tunnel operates on only water, coins, tokens, and code numbers air and electricity, there are no hy- to activate MINI-TUNNEL. Length 12 ft,6 in draulic or oil systems to be affected Width 12 ft,6 in by leaks or temperature changes. space, saving the cost of more ex- Height 9 ft, 11 in Rugged construction and quality tensive and complicated systems. Weight 3,290lb components make routine mainte- Construction costs are also less Service Requirements: nance or repair fast and easy. Mini- because Mini-Tunnel easily fits into Tunnel really lives up to RYKO's rep- locations that previously could ac- Air: 100 PSI at 3.0 CFM Y a system. Water: 20 GPM at 40 PSI commodate only wash s utation for reliability) Mini-Tunnel is economical, tool Electric: 3 phase- The two specially engineered ten NATIONWIDE NETWORK 2001230 V,90 amp HP fans cost less to operate, but RYKO has a national network of 460 V,40 amp provide the same efficiency as dry- Sales and Service Centers that assure 575 V,35 amp ers with far more horsepower. you of the highest standards, Recommended Bay whether you need assistance with Requirements: TOTAL VERSATILITY1 your site selection, layout, or service RYKO Mini-Tunnel is the most ver- after the sale. Length 32.0 ft)9.75M) satile wash/wax/dry system in the RYKO Mini-Tunnel Width 13.5ft(4.1M) industry. The merchandising con- Standard Features. . . Height 11.0ft)3.35M) cepts and capabilities of Mini-Tunnel are virtually unlimited. Mini-Tunnel • Self-containea. . .a totally com- For smaller bay dimensions, con- is ideal for service stations, rental plete vehicle wash/dry system tactyour RYKO Representative. agency fleets, auto dealerships, and is All-aluminum frame and fan con- private investors. struction For additional information, call Mini-Tunnel offers a complete ve- • Requires minimal space for opera- your local RYKO Sales and Service hicle cleaning system in a limited tion — building size requirements Center. A � n _`w' RYKO Manufacturing Company-11600 N W 54th Ave. • Grimes,Iowa 50111 is (515)986-3700 a TWX 910 520-2546 TM RYKO Manufacturing Oo,reserves the right to revise specifications,features or design without notice or obligation. 4185 1010 14483-Mi CITY OF PALM DESERT INTEROFFICE MEMO TO: Catherine Sass FROM: Brent Conley RE: PP 86-43 Residence Inn DATE: September 24, 1986 The proposed plan as shown, does not include a sidewalk for pedestrian traffic on the east side of Deep Canyon. T,e�s�nd o leyb re n e north st corner of th c m ex its si�sua �n a oo r f om ' ewn the otes e ,plo e anq ibl vin th7 �1 � th`e- c ter e� e co a ( ar poo ) D n, aec -e tion n erir' �� \ � p si e j out . o re "u ' les�• 1 Hotels of this ype necessitate the use of solid-core or steel doors , equipped with dead-bolt locks, door viewers and latch guards . s offs could be equipped with a safe for the storage of residents valuables and money while away from the room. The use of locking doors on the sliding glass doors is important for security of the guest. These locks could be keyed to the room keys. The use of lighting in this project is also a major concern to provide safety for the guests. The use of lighting of at least 1/2 FC . The entrance ways and walking areas and 2 FC in the parking lots is essential . e k i g 're s d h o f 1 � G ! ! t TJ ' h - pa i h o sib o �e i o d\ e ' g a e t 'n fo t The addressing of the rooms should be considered to use even numbers to the right and odd numbers to the left to assist emergency vehicles in locating rooms more efficiently. The cognplex sh s a large n mber of plants and trees for lan cape g. The m inte ance of ese nee to be a dressed.\The tree sho ld be t ' mme high an bushes pruned 1 w to allow maxim yn vi ing of he mplex b passi patrol nits and employees. \ The proposed gas station should be addressed seperately. The landscaping around the complex should be kept low to allow viewing from both Hwy. 111 and Deep Canyon. Any possible burming in these areas should be low enough to allow visability. The gas station check-out stand does not include the use of a safe to secure daily receipts. The use of a safe will allow employees to deposit monies throughout the work shift to help eliminate the loss of large sums of money and provide safety to employees. If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to contact me a�31.i Brent Conley Crime Prevention Officer BC/rrt CITY OF PALM DESERT INTEROFFICE MEMO TO: Catherine Sass FROM: Brent Conley RE: PP 86-43 Residence Inn DATE: September 24, 1986 The proposed plan as shown, does not include a sidewalk for pedestrian traffic on the east side of Deep Canyon. The sand volleyball area in the northeast corner of the complex is situated in an area too far from view of the hotels employees and visitors . Possibly, moving this area closer to the center of the the complex ( near the pool ) would encourage recreation and eliminate a possible "hang-out" for area juveniles. Hotels of this type necessitate the use of solid-core or steel doors , equipped with dead-bolt locks, door viewers and latch guards . Also, the rooms could be equipped with a safe for the storage of residents valuables and money while away from the room. The use of locking doors on the sliding glass doors is important for security of the guest. These locks could be keyed to the room keys. The use of lighting in this project is also a major concern to provide safety for the guests. The use of lighting of at least 1/2 FC at the entrance ways and walking areas and 2 FC in the parking lots is essential. The addressing of the rooms should be considered to use even numbers to the right and odd numbers to the left to assist emergency vehicles in locating rooms more efficiently. The complex shows a large number of plants and trees for landscaping. The maintenance of these needs to be addressed. The trees should be trimmed high and bushes pruned low to allow maximum viewing of the complex by passing patrol units and employees. The proposed gas station should be addressed seperately. The landscaping around the complex should be kept low to allow viewing from both Hwy. 111 and Deep Canyon. Any possible burming in these areas should be low enough to allow visability. The gas station check-out stand does not include the use of a safe to secure daily receipts. The use of a safe will allow employees to deposit monies throughout the work shift to help eliminate the loss of large sums of money and provide safety to employees. g have any questions r comments, please feel free to contact xt. 30onley Crime Prevention Officer BC/rrt INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM rr,� Z� TO: DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES iLc'EP155 1986u FROM: DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS COMMUNITY DEYELOPMENi DEPARiMENi 1� rill Oi PALM DESERT SUBJECT: `, F? 067-A13 DATE : _< . l /9Y7__ The following should be considered conditions of approval : Gl ) D ainage and signalization fund fees , as required by City or finance, shall be paid prior to or efi_ (grading permit issuance) . 2) Drain a facilities shall be provided, per Ordinance 218 an the Master Drainage Plan , to the specificati ns of the Dire or of Public Works . 3 ) Storm drain c struction shall be contingent u on a drainage study by the pr ate engineer that is approv d by the Department of Pubi Works . 4) Full public improvement including tr ffic safety lighting, as required by ordinance a the Di r ctor of Public Works , shall be installed in accorda wI City standards . / 5) Improvement plans for water an se r systems shall be approved by the respective s vice d tricts with "as-built" plans submitted to the Dep tment of P lic Works prior to the project final . O6 Complete improvement p ans and specification shall be submitted, as require by ordinance, to the Di ctor of Public Works for the king and approval before co truction of any improvement is commenced . The engineer sh 11 submit "as-built" plans rior to the acceptance of the impr vements by the City. 7) All private (driveways and parking lots ) shall In inspected b the engineering department and a standard inspection fee shall be paid prior to (grading permit issuance) . O8 Landscap ng maintenance on ILQ4WAy /// At-kg 14-EPUuv .i shall be provided by the ( (property owner) .. 9) Existing uti 1 ities on shall be undergrounded per each respective utility dis- trict' s recommendation . If determined to be unfeasible applicant shall agree to participate in any future util-ity undergrounding district . 10 Traffic safety striping on .014HWA-4ffi A 7-, -G P� /�y, � ROA>> shall be provided to the specifications of the Director of Public Works . A traffic control plan must be submitted to and approved by the Director of Public Works before placing pavement markings . 0 Complete grading plans and specifications shall be submit- ted, as required by ordinance , to the Director of Public Works for checking and approval prior to issuance of any permits . 12 ) Dedication of Meet of right-of-way on /yf6Hc1L)A_/ ill shall be done prior to issuance of any permits and approval of plans . 13 Installation of curb and gutter , mat^c�hing paving and 6 root n+eA.aCreik s i dewa l k on 0466WA ( ffl �D d�.c CSTJ10 /2�� 14) Waiver .of access to except at approved locations shall be granted on the final map. 15) Close unused driveway with full height curb and gutter . 16 Offsite improvement plans to be approved by Public Works Department and a surety posted to guarantee the required offsite improvements prior to Mzg# (grading permit issuance) . 17) Full improvement of interior streets based on (60' residen- tial ) (private) ( industrial ) street standards as established in accordance with Chapter 26 , Section 26. 40 . 040, C .P . D . Code . 18 Installation of one-half landscaped median in A6f4wa4 ffi or cash payment for one-half the cost of landscaped median at the option of the Director of Public Works. 9) Traffic analysis to be prepared for the project to address the specific impacts on existing networks ( street and intersections) and the proposed mitigation measures recom- mended for approval by the City. 20 ) Installation of sewers to serve this project . 21 Size, number and location of driveways to Public Works specifications with only ,]� driveway approach ( es ) to be allowed to serve this property. 22 ) No (new) requirements . (Original conditions apply) 23 ) Grading permit issuance shall be subject to the waiver of parcel map first being approved and recorded. 24 Complete (parcel ) map..i_ shall be submitted as required by ordinance to the Director of Public Works for checking and approval and be recorded before issuance of any permits . 0Anyand all off-site improvements shall be preceded by the 0 approval of plans and the issuance of valid encroachment permit ( s ) by the Department of Public Works . 26 A complete preliminary soils investigation , conducted by a registered soils engineer, shall be submitted to and approv- ed by the Department of Public Works prior to issuance of the grading permit . 27 ) Applicant shall secure reciprocal ingress and egress access easements from the owner/( s ) of lot (s ) 28 Acc�s5 TD l3oTN NIGHu>RY [II U d ((JF�P C/i to KclkP F+ r niY� - �!2<a5i ��TP>�/zLY D2[�r-c✓R L S/f�,� (Rr L-lmr� CZF6TF2cc77 J 9N N iLa[s n/�F✓s 70 c— scJlw //�lG2rSs /fi,�� i=�R.Fsse 29 APP" r4 i srt,'Y/,c- PLAN✓ ']O P(IovrAS A .Z Co> s) i0 / A cc o o � i and J . Folk RA/RJF Rev . 7/25/86 OAPALLCAn/ '( S "�,L p!?e�V/QE FoTL /�05n TV2�I oJT' O.J lfrUHwy�l /r� 7� 7TtE SA775F �?roti of TdF p4LEL7v2 of Pvau(_ 000i;LK5 A,4A SvNLrnt� ^TR4NSrr �GF�rcy, 3) TI-NPLi.Cl1-w+T Slh9-LL... (p�J45T'i2cl4i A-L� //H/?Ray.�r�F-�/TS 4l/T!f/H T1i.E c5il+rF f�16NT-OF-cjhy 7b - EALlrsn �s Srr/*�irz�s, 1v}iJ ISr-!'or,+F�s /l /�S 5//vu1iJ Dr.J TAL_ PJ0-39C— SJT,- :"C3F C6>-+P7uJo.�s /��ll rSxTF./JJ.> INTO MIV6wf1VVS Fort (=-n(OVL,fI Td> Lf'}N)FLIGT'. e ,r`1 INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM fe TO: DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES FROM : DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS SUBJECT: DATE : �•5�I 19�6 �f C2,F- I&AD /0/2,1-,/6-16 The following should be considered conditions of approval : p 1 ) Drainage and signalization fund fees , as required by City ordinance., shall be paid prior to =R:4 ( grading permit issuance ) . 2 ) Drainage facilities shall be provided , per Ordinance No . 218 and the Master Drainage Plan , to the specifications of the Director of Public Works . 3 ) Storm drain construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study by the private engineer that is approved by the Department of Public Works . 4) Full public improvements , including traffic safety lighting , as required by ordinance and the Director of Public Works , shall be installed in accordance with City standards . 5 ) Improvement plans for water and sewer systems shall be approved by the respective service districts with "as-built" plans submitted to the Department of Public Works prior to the project final . 06 Complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted , as required by ordinance, to the Director of Public Works for checking and approval before construction of any improvements is commenced . The engineer shall submit "as-built" plans prior to the acceptance of the improvements by the City. 7.) All private (driveways and parking lots ) shall be inspected by the engineering department and a standard inspection fee shall be paid prior to ( grading permit issuance ) . OLandscaping maintenance on �/-f/(,�Why // / /bD 1 -EpG, v i D shall be provided by the ( ) (property owner ) . . 9 ) Existing utiiities on AL29wAl IL1 shall be undergrounded per each respective utility dis- trict' s recommendation . If determined to be unfeasible applicant shall agree to participate in any future utility undergrounding district . 9Traffic safety striping on 1t)1.14ulq./ / 1i �� IvJ sh9all be provided to the specifications of the Director or of Public Works . A traffic control plan must be submitted to and approved by the Director of Public Works before placing pavement markings . 0 Complete grading plans and specifications shall be submit- ted , as required by ordinance , to the Director of Public Works for checking and approval prior to issuance of any permits . 12 ) Dedication of y _feet of right-of-way on df(.W, A-( M shall be done prior to issuance of any permits and approval of plans . 13 Installation of curb and gutter , matching paving and 8 coot tiEd , sidewalk on / witwnv ill 14) Waiver of access to except at approved locations shall be granted on the final map. 15 ) Close unused driveway with full height curb and gutter . l6 Offsite improvement plans to be approved by Public Works Department and a surety posted to guarantee the required offsite improvements prior to (grading permit issuance) . 17) Full improvement of interior streets based on (60 ' residen- tial ) ( private) ( industrial ) street standards as established In accordance with Chapter 26 , Section 26. 40 . 040 , C . P . D . Code . 18 Installation of one-half landscaped median in �GHv/A1 �� i or cash payment for one-half the cost of landscaped median at the option of the Director of Public Works . 9) Traffic analysis to be prepared for the project to address the specific impacts on existing networks ( street and intersections ) and the proposed mitigation measures recom- mended for approval by the City. 20 ) Installation of sewers to serve this project . 21 Size , number and location of driveways to Public Works specifications with only _s driveway approach ( es ) to be , allowed to serve this property. 22 ) No (new) requirements . (Original conditions apply) 23 ) Grading permit issuance shall be subject to the waiver of parcel map first being approved and recorded. :�. 0Complete ( parcel ) map FR� shall be submitted as required by ordinance to the Director of Public Works for checking and approval and be recorded before issuance of any permits . 25 Any and all off-site improvements shall be preceded by the approval of plans and the issuance of valid encroachment permit ( s ) by the Department of Public Works . 26 A complete preliminary "soils investigation , conducted by a registered soils engineer , shall be submitted to and approv- ed by the Department of Public Works prior to issuance of the grading permit . 27) Applicant shall secure reciprocal ingress and egress access easements from the owner//( s ) of lot ( s ) za ccEsS T-0 , . - s/ram, LL b 7i //V aarz.ss t.>-"z'> I_caFSso , —c> PI �2✓ 29 APPO i44 i ItY�L� >y1�IFy /Tr p�A✓ ?0 7 a�1�� ?I` cfi-C�.vS)FiOV A-E tea` H"7 - 1� wit,. '7y a'C 2'f GFEf Richard J . Fobs , P .E . RA/RJF Rev . 7/25/86 •., TLI)iU w OiJ Ffr(+hwl4.l /r� 70 77iL,ET/SFRcT/u a of rNF_ Dr, �1 P�;3Lrc- wa;Lk-s Tryy.,.✓srr /rG F�ccy. 31 R nvLtC4, T s/n4L L coN.sra✓�r- aL� �Si�+rf jZtstlT-o1 way 7b S Tm�:�Ras. gO nn /ups Mr seE �r� v c I�t✓ /l /FS S/lour Oi.1 Tm�_ p2oJEC7__ Si T.E PL/fT/r St/a�'t Flea 'i3F c j,,77r 000s f� D rXTfzAJD /A1Tn d)gjvs._&js Fort r-N(O-_�W4 Td W CL'nI E / M/nJ 1 n1/'�,E- 170Tf_ry T/h-L V,EN/C1.E CwFLI L r. As DFirA+�/NFv 6't r7m D/nr oti 33 �F rZMGF+� CcLn�Ft�oc r o� waag d �fvftvP/ i¢T Tv moJT Gov n+�uY �2rvEw� y onJ E7�j� p' CiMI yv.✓ /? A�PL([q„�T Si L �DtF f p/u✓rL 77� R F STf2a u iNo✓;fi rrn�� 7a fZ-fl+h/"T INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES FROM: DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS SUBJECT: p P. 8�6' ys DATE : �C. B11 ! !fSZ- The following should be considered conditions of approval : 1 ) Drainage and signalization fund fees , as required by City ordinance, shall be paid prior to ( reeerdaleiem of the Final tmapj (grading permit issuance) . 0Drainage facilities shall be provided, per Ordinance No . 0 218 and the Master Drainage Plan , to the specifications of the Director of Public Works . 0 Storm drain construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study by the private engineer that is approved by the Department of Public Works . 4) Full public Improvements , including traffic safety lighting, as required by ordinance and the Director of Public Works , shall be installed in accordance with City standards . 5 ) Improvement plans for water and sewer systems shall be approved by the respective service districts with "as-built" plans submitted to the Department of Public Works prior to the project final . 6Complete Improvement plans and specifications shall be 6 submitted, as required by ordinance, to the Director of Public Works for checking and approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. The engineer shall submit "as-built" plans prior to the acceptance of the improvements by the City. 7 ) All private L (driveways and parking lots ) shall be inspected by the engineering department and a standard inspection fee shall be paid prior to (grading permit issuance) . 8) Landscaping maintenance on 1101111 AND l�Ev CANvON oAD S shall be provided by the (property owner) . . 9 ) Existing utilities on llwylli AKi> �r�6P CA+JveN {2o%!b shall be undergrounded per each respective utility dis- trict ' s recommendation . if determined to be unfeasible applicant shall agree to participate in any future utility undergrounding district . 10 Traffic safety striping on 11621i11 CANvorl Roca shall be provided to the specifications of the Director of Public Works . A traffic control plan must be submitted to and approved by the Director of Public Works before placing pavement markings . 11 Complete grading plans and specifications shall be submit- ted, as required by ordinance, to the Director of Public Works for checking and approval prior to Issuance of any permits . $$ -of-way on � , 0 /D�e,.dication of SS feet of right m lbaap ,\_J04gVOA, P- A,> shall be done prior to issuance of any permits and approval of plans . 3 ) Installation of curb and gutter , matching paving and SFoor MCANor&Pv4 51dewa1k on .14 LabA,> 'DEED vo RoAj> 14) Waiver of access to except at approved locations shall be granted on the final map. 15) Close unused driveway with full height curb and gutter . 0 Offsite improvement plans to be approved by Public Works Department and a surety posted to guarantee the required offsite improvements prior to 'r-^^^male^ _f th final - rnap ) (grading permit issuance) . 17 ) Full improvement of interior streets based on ( 60' reslden- tial ) (private) ( industrial ) street standards as established in accordance with Chapter 26 , Section 26. 40 . 040 , C . P . D . Code . 0 Installation of one-half landscaped median in 16 4WAv 1)1 or cash payment for one-half the cost of landscaped median at the option of the Director of Public Works . 19 Traffic analysis to be prepared for the project to address the specific impacts on existing networks ( street and intersections ) and the proposed mitigation measures recom- mended for approval by the City. 20 ) Installation of sewers to serve this project . 21 Size , number and location of driveways to Public Works specifications with only 2 driveway approach (es ) to be allowed to serve this property. 22 ) No (new) requirements . (Original conditions apply) 23 ) Grading permit issuance shall be subject to the waiver of parcel map first being approved and recorded . f ©4 Complete (parcel ) map+sj shall be submitted as required by ordinance to the Director of Public Works for checking and approval and be recorded before issuance of any permits . 25 Any and all off-site improvements shall be preceded by the approval of plans and the issuance of valid encroachment Permit ( s ) by the Department of Public Works . ®6 A complete preliminary soils investigation, conducted by a registered soils engineer , shall be submitted to and approv- ed by the Department of Public Works prior to issuance of the grading permit . 27) Applicant shall secure reciprocal ingress and egress access easements from the owner ( s ) of lot( s ) 28 /JC.cr S //S To f�l_u. '4'/ //I SAA�� a& V'EGt rz= , 7-/{2 a MFDyA < .To P_Ir.'tr 7'Ul2-! /N f'n 5�, .2t5 cc .4, ,n QII 1 AmHnAiz•' A r r_F-r,,, 2Ai r✓1 pE c h )L_P/aow cl rl O'o nFS F_P �.. yD di P�&rn .4'T- Trsr ta'i��Ir OA ru Ra t]PN.Y Richard J . Folkers , P.E . RA/RJF Rev . 7/25/86 ) ® APPuCA-�T _W4L,� AReviof Fok_ Wo To2/.lo✓T c�,� I7t/4N•7f ///1 'rO THE SRTIS�A�T^xu.t op T/}E l7/REc7bz 0, l'(�(7�-/�- Wor7/c5 �A sc�+uc�NE OT-/`L L !ram!P2o✓%/hP.v7� n_ t4 97?o-rt= R.IG/iT-oF- wR y S/>9L DF Cs� 5 XIJ 77WC7 *a ww-- 0-H`R/h is �S7> cw2As . Q11GD/M4 /S1,/4v4DS NT 4aoTN- P(>�r9- l,^171? kkfS S/ft�N f'P1UrX-_7 ' S/7E- . A--" VY-Mt GE COW T//.j✓00S ^14> F-XT� /A1rU D�f✓Euh4Yt �AI� E+V000./i 'jo �RECL✓AE /in.W/rni?F- tJENIU-E Cp'VFUCi. It= 'Ta.4r' tc cr.vJFL crc ,Dosvrt oP. l4s .DF_TG42tr,ln/iS17 $y THE Dl ArCTcn72 pF RQJE, W6zr-S , 4r- TH£ n705T sovJ wr'A-" cj)RIV.EGU4y ON a76,--PC'hJYON KOkp T+/F "PiAcR-tT [u'//YJLL rs7wD/L-r TYf.E f�iL/✓F `/ 7a ILE.Sr�cT Mo�F-�P.�,vrs 'Tb 7-V/Znt /+c(GRFSS fE62g5,s /i c c is 5 D,2-1 t/FcuA Ys si�s 13r= /4 /y/ic/fa7✓n 1 of 2 Y . ,ss Fo7t 09x[>- �x/r /tea D/.;=o Gn,,,t�..� F-•�r�y. / M.,p FIcIsTiVc S/�nit� /H` fo rc a'6�or-vTr£� Tv T7/F SAT!$TAc-i7oJ or 13(.,>" Cif4_r/7 LS /h/D Tif r^_. _ n- -- - w 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 Date LSv DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING AND SAFETY PRELIMINARY REVIEW OF PLANS THIS•IS NOT pA PLAN CHHE�C,K I -yam DEVELOPMENT: �'I F�01 wP j -I y yI 43 The comments below are based on the following assumptions and code groups: 1985 Uniform Building Code 1985 Uniform Plumbing Code 1985 Uniform Mechanical Code 1984 National Electrical Code Title 24 Handicapp / Accessibility Standards Title 24 Energy Conservation Standards Title 24 Multi-Family Adaptability Standards Code Assumption: n^ Building Classification —An Type of Construction fnn� Sprinklered I y Allowable Floor Area: nn�� Basic Allowable lJ Setbacks Sprinklered Multi-Story Factor Total Allowable Sq.Ft. �— CHECKLIST P( Plans shall be prepared by a licensed California architect. Show went number on plans. Submit a list of features proposed that show compliance to the multi- family handicapp regulations. Use a maximum cap of $740.00 per adapt- able dwelling unit. I Page two. . . HANDICAPPED: Site requirements per handicapp standards. PARKING: ow number of stalls required. Owcin�e parking stall locations to allow main entry access. UTAi!/. Show international logo, loading and unloading zone requirements. Ramp from parking lot to sidewalk not shown on plans. BUILDING ACCESS: Doors shall be minimum 3211 clear in width. Provide 18" space on the swing side of doors. On plans, show height of all bathroom accessories. Handicapp bathroom layout does not conform to current standards. Before further comments can be made, additional plans and specifications are needed for review. The following plans must be submitted to the Department of Building & Safety for ]an review: Architectural Drawings and Details. l \Structural Drawings and Calculations. Complete Electrical, Mechanical and Plumbing Plans and Specifications. tad Title 24 Energy Conservation Documentation Forms. COMMENTS: L. ELLER PRINCIPAL PLANS EXAMINER off n_TnM 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 Date DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING AND SAFETY PRELIMINARY REVIEW OF PLANS THIS,� pp IS NOT A PLAN CHECK! R�e DEVELOPMENT: sl Li e_nce� 'a Uo V� The comments below are based on the following assumptions and code groups: 1985 Uniform Building Code 1985 Uniform Plumbing Code 1985 Uniform Mechanical Code 1984 National Electrical Code Title 24 Handicapp / Accessibility Standards Title 24 Energy Conservation Standards Title 24 Multi-Family Adaptability Standards Code Assumption: Fes'*2Y\}iat Building Classification — 1� Type of Construction Sprinklered VE05Z Allowable Floor Area: Basic Allowable Cab ei.1 Setbacks Sprinklered Multi-Story Factor Total Allowable Sq.Ft. CHECKLIST Plans shall be prepared by a licensed California architect. Show current number on plans. Wu bmit a list of features proposed that show compliance to the multi- family handicapp regulations. Use a maximum cap of $740.00 per adapt- able dwelling unit. Page two. . .. HANDICAPPED: Site requirements per handicapp standards. PARKING: ❑ Show number of stalls required. Revise parking stall locations to allow main entry access. Show international logo, loading and unloading zone requirements. lllli1 Ramp from parking lot to sidewalk not shown on plans. V `BUILDING ACCESS: Doors shall be minimum 32" clear in width. rovide 18" space on the swing side of doors. plans, show height of all bathroom accessories. ndicapp bathroom layout does not conform to current standards. Before further comments can be made, additional plans and specifications are needed for review. The following plans must be submitted to the Department of Building & Safety for plan review: Architectural Drawings and Details. Structural Drawings and Calculations. Complete Electrical, Mechanical and Plumbing Plans and Specifications. Title 24 Energy Conservation Documentation Forms. COMMENTS: - �,� LLER ZPRINCIPAL PLANS EXAMINER RIVERSIDECOUNTY of ceuo FIRE DEPARTMENT IN COOPERATION WITH THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY nfvEeSine.., .: RAY HEBRARD *l4Exr of f°e FIRE CHEF 210 WEST SAN IACINT'O AVENUE ` 5Y 11 �� {Q6 L ERRIS,.CALIFORNIA92370 D 1�11G��S Q, t 4y1�1�j;�57-3183 Ramon Diaz V P,�j,� Planning and Community SEP 12 1986 Development Director 73510 Fred Waring COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Palm Desert, CA 92260 CITY OF PALM DESERT Reference: Applicant: bX01VIU/MILLEP Dear Mr. Ramon Diaz i The following fire protection requirements are in accordance with the Uniform Fire Code and Life Safety Code standards. 1 . Install a water system capable .of delivering 3Qo GPM fire flow from any fire hydrant for a 3 hour duration in addition to domestic supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement. 2. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants so that no point of any building is more than j.99 feet from a fire hydrant measured along approved vehicular travel ways. a. exterior surface of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow, and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. b. curbs shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. c. hydrants shall not be located closer than 2� feet to any building. 3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and three copies of the water system plan to the Fire Marshal for review. Upon approval , one copy will be sent to the Building Department and the original will be returned to the developer. 4. The water system plan shall be-signed by a registered civil engineer and approved by the water company with the following certification: "Ilcertify that the design of the water system in PPg6—'f3 is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Fire Marshal ." 5. Prior to delivery of combustible materials to the building site, the required water system shall be installed, operating and delivering the required flow. 6. Additional fire protection requirements may be necessary when the applicant submits specific plans for consideration and approval . 7. All buildings over5QQ 0 square feet require an approved fire sprinkler system. 8. All three story buildings must have a Fire Marshal approved fire alarm system. Very truly yours, RAY HEBRARD ,FFime IChhief By 11Y, M.itl -C-'X MIKE MCCONNELL Fire Marshal II I 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 November 26, 1986 Mr. Thomas Miller 11753 San Vincente Los Angeles, CA 90049 Re: PP 86-45 Dear Mr. Miller: To facilitate the processing of the PP 86-45 application for Residence Inn, a restaurant, and Mobil Gas Station the following status report has been established to coordinate the efforts of all those involved. To date the precise plan was presented before the architectural review commission (317-C) 8-26-86, continued to 9-23-86 then continued to 10-14-86 with preliminary approval of redesigned plans granted with conditions on this date. Issues to be addressed were: Hotel : 1 . New elevations be provided detailing roof pitch. 2. Preliminary landscape plan to be reviewed and approved. 3. Provide a section-through drawing on Deep Canyon and Highway Ill center line to the property. Mobil Station: 1 . Canopy to have a texturized surface 2. Stucco on building to be a muted off-white color 3. Provide a meandering sidewalk around perimeter of site (For more specific discussion see attached minutes. ) With preliminary approval of the architectural review commission, the precise plan was presented to planning commission at public hearing on November 4, 1986. Staff recommended approval of the site plan expressing concerns over the submitted architecture. Staff determined the visual look of the building could be finalized at staff level with the aid of the architectural commission. MR. THOMAS MILLER PP 86-45 NOVEMBER 26, 1986 The planning commission heard testimony and continued the case to November 18, 1986. Issues toe addressed were: 1 . Mr. Foster was to meet with Haver 8 Associates and Mr. Folkers to resolve drainage issues. 2. More input regarding grading was to be supplied, conditioned that grade will not be raised more than one foot. 3. The noise generation from air conditioning units placement would be looked at by Architectural Commission. 4. A noise generation study or graphic would be supplied regarding the car wash. 5. The gas station should provide a more unique village-style architecture. (For more specific discussion see attached minutes. ) The requested information was not available to staff for the November 18 planning commission meeting and the case was continued to December 2, 1986. The Mobil Station redesign requested was provided staff November 13. November 26, 1986 at 9:30 a.m, staff met with Mr. Folkers and was informed that drainage issues have been resolved and that a detention pond will be located at the north end of the parcel to later hook up with the Toropeak storm drain. Staff was further informed that an easement for traffic signal interconnection will be required along Highway 111 . Items #4 and #5 are unresolved at this time. Of further concern is the width of the easement along Highway 111 which is to be 40 feet for the entire length. New elevations were submitted to staff November 25 at 2:45 p.m. The architecture of Residence Inn is becoming more reflective of a desert style. Per phone conversations with Mr. Baum, staff had anticipated recommending approval of the Residence Inn and continuance of the Mobil Station; however, the submittal of a revised site plan at such a late hour did not allow staff sufficient time to review the changes. Packets were delivered at noon, November 26 with a recommendation for continuance. While staff will consider recommending approval of a portion of the project, we must retain control of circulation. For future efficiency, the planning commission meets the 1st and 3rd Tuesday of each month. Packets are delivered to commissioners the Friday before. Secretaries must have staff reports and exhibits by Wednesday to prepare the 2 MR. THOMAS MILLER PP 86-45 NOVEMBER 26, 1986 packets. Staff should have final exhibits and plans Wednesday, one week prior to prepare staff reports and recommendations. The architectural commission meets the 2nd and 4th Tuesday of each month. Packets are delivered the Friday before. The secretary should have agenda items and materials by the preceding Wednesday. Staff should have exhibits and plans Wednesday, one week prior to prepare a written report. Staff should have sufficient time to review plans to gain familiarity, prepare a written report and prepare a recommendation. When we're dealing with three projects in one application, the project by nature is complex. The more complex the submittal the more time this takes. It is to your project's benefit to have materials delivered early. The above information should clarify the status of PP 86-45. Sincerely, l RAMON A. DIAZ DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT/PLANNING RAD/CS/tm cc: Sandy Baum 3 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION NOVEMBER 4, 1966 Moved by Commissioner Downs , seronrled by Commissioner Whitlock, adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 1190, approving PP 86-44 and C/Z 86-7, subject to conditions. Carried 5-0. A FiVE MINUTE RECESS WAS CALLED AT 8: 15 P.M. D. Case No. PP 86-45 )- THOMAS MILLER, Applicant Request for approval of a negative declaration of environmental impact and a precise plan of design to allow construction of 168 unit inn, a full service restaurant and a gas station on 10 acres In the 'PC (4) S.P. and PR-5 N, S.P. at the northeast corner of Highway III and Deep Canyon Road. Ms. Sass outlined the salient pnints of the staff report and noted that conditions had been added per Hidden Palms homeowners, concerns. Staff recommended approval . Commissioner Downs asked for clarification on the service provided by the gas station market. Ms. Sass replied that small items and soda pop would be provided, but not as full a service as a convenience store. Chairman Crites asked if there were any objections to burying the car wash In a herm. Ms. Sass did not see any problem and Indicated that arrhitectural commission suggested berming and noted that it world return to architectural commission for final approval . Chairman Crites opened the puhlic testimony and asked if the applicant to address the commission. MR. SANDY BAUM, 45-800 Deep Canyon, indicated he had been working on site for three yenrs and fell- it would he compatible. He Indicated that he had met with H i dden Palms on October 18. Commissioner Downs asked if he had met with any other homeowners hesides Hidden Palms. Mr. H.-vim replied no, but indicated that the recess gave them an opportunity to review the plans. MR. BOB FOSTER, developer for Residence Inn, stated that the project meets the criteria of znninq and Indicated that they were. working diligently to meet the requirements of the architectural commission. fin notpri that there would be 22% building coverage and 501. open spare provided. He stated that 9 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION NOVEMBER 4, 1966 he would work with staff to comply with conditions . Commissioner Richards asked if there was anything unique about this particular Residence Inn. Mr. Foster replied that the Inns are all the same. Commissioner Richards recommended that the applicant study the hullding5 to the west for tile and arch designs, as well as Hidden Palms architecture. Mr. Foster Indicated that he was trying to achieve a design to make most people happy as long as he could stain the basic floor plan. Commissioner Whitlock asked if the gate house provided security. Mr . Foster replied that it was a registration office. Commissioner Whitlock asked for and received clarification regarding services provided by the restaurant, the usable balcony condition, and air conditioning units. Chairman Crites asked about a provision of a water fpature, citing Embassy Sultes as an example. Mr. Foster indicated that with the Art in Public Places provision, some kind of detail would be provided. MR. DAVID FLOOD, Santa Monica. described the service station and car wash services. He indicated that the car wash would only be open during daylight hours . He stated that the buildings would he very simplp In design with a motto of less Is more. He indicated concurrence with the staff report and asked for approval . Commissioner Richards suggested a more. unique village style archltprturp. Mr. Flood replied that a residential look might be inappropriate on a commercial street, would block views , and wntild hp distracting from a simple- looking facility; he felt that a village look would destroy the . efficiency of the building. Chairman Crites stated that since this would be the first building on the highway, the. proposed design would not fit in with the city. Mr. Flood Indicated that he felt that landscaping was mnre Important, but was willing to respond to the needs of the city. Commissioner Richards suggested that the applicant study the project on Country Club Drive and Monterey Avenue to provide a design that would be compatible with the rest of the city. � 5 A Chairman Crites asked if anyone present wished t ak in FAVOR or OPPOSITION to the proposed. MR. GERRIT GOIIDSWAARD, 44-755 Uepp Canyon, felt that this was a very difficult corner and that while the hotel would provide a significant improvement, any irres5 onto Deep Canyon would create problems. He also stated that there was no such thing as a qulet service station and recommended that the car wash be eliminated. Chairman Critp5 asked the applicant If he was providing blow dryers and if he rnuld provide noise standard ID MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION NOVEMBER 4, 1986 data. Mr. Flood replied that there were a few blowers inside, but It was basically a drip dry setup and also indicated that he did not have noise data at this time. MR. RICHARD WELBY, Desert Sun Apartments to the west, spoke regarding the access off of Alessandro and the horrendous problems because of narrowness. Mr. Folkers stated that the intersection of Alessandro and Deep Canyon would be right-turn in and right-turn out of the complex If a problem develops. Mr. Folkers also stated that a sniper block concept was being studied. Chairman Crites asked Mr. Folkers what he would recommend as a condition of approval to stipulate this. Mr. Folkers replied that it was already provided. MR. VIC EFFINGER, 44-539 Sorrento Court, Indicated that he was • a member of the board of the homenwners association. He stated that he met with Mr. Foster and advised that he meet with the homeowners in February and he had agreed. He expressed concern with traffic in and out. onto Neap Canyon and felt that the bushes and trees seriously hlncked the view. He stated that the architectural design of the station did not fit in with their housing development or the other buildings. He also expressed concern over noise from the car wash and service station. MR. KEN STENDELL , 44-675 Monaco Circle, Informed commission that he bought his house two and a half years ago and has been looking forward to a project such as this. He expressed concern regarding the grading level to the north because of drainage, security during construction, suggested an alternate route and location for garbage disposal , indicated that this project should not have a PA system like Emhassy Suites that can be heard on Saturdays and Sundays, the project should comply with the city's 30 foot height requirempnt, and asked about the gas station business hours . Mr . Flood replied 24 hours. Commissioner Richards indicated that hours of operation could be limited. Mr. Diaz stated that security during construction could be helped by requiring a fence to screen the construction site and felt that the trash enrlosures might he located In the southeast portion of the slip. Mr. Diaz Indicated that a condition be placed that the PA system have limited hours, Indicated that the drainage issue could not be addressed at this time. Mr. Foster replied that someonp world ho on duty at night and that there should not be a problem wlth the PA system. He indicated that 11 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION NOVEMBER 4, 1986 he was meeting with Haver 8 Associates and Mr. Folkers to resolve the drainage Issue. Commissioner Richards noted that the cost for hook-up to the storm drain was a seven figure number. Mr. Foster replied that the city might participate and that there was discussion regarding water retention. Mr. Foster also Indicated that there were no plans to change the elevation to effect the homeowners In the rear. Mr. Folkers indicated that with the Increasing concern for elevations, they would look at Hidden Palms' elevation so that there wouldn't be any controversy. Mr. Folkers also concurred that storm drain hook-up was a seven figure number and that negotiations were under way with Indian Wells, but was moving slowly. He indicated that water would not be a problem to Hidden Palms but Indicated that the Las Lagos area was still under study. Commissioner Richards requested more Input regarding grading and placing a condition that grading will not be raised more than one foot. Mr. Folkers replied that this would not be a problem. Commissioner Richards felt the developer or architect should be involved. Commissioner Erwood stated that the concerns were noise, air conditionl.ng units, car wash and recommended that a sound study be done and a study of traffic on Deep Canyon. He also felt that the ,design of the gas station could be improved. He felt that the applicant would be a good neighbor and would work with staff. He recommended a two week continuance. Commissioner Whitlock agreed with the two week continuance. Commissioner Richards noted that the project would be along Highway III and felt that a noise study was not needed and that the air conditioning units should not be a problem--architectural commission would review them. Regarding traffic, he felt that public works would work on it and drainage was being studied. Action: Moved by Commissioner Erwood, seconded by Commissioner Whitlock, continuing PP 86-45 to November 18, 1986. Carried 4-1 (Commissioner Richards voting no) . Commissioner Richards noted that a full Environmental Impact Report had been completed for this area which could provide information. 12 k i OO fl° jll rnm ��b�®I3o�o 73-510 FRED WARINO DRIVE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 October 20, 1986 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION ACTION CASE NO: 317 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) : THOMAS MILLER for Residence inn, 11753 San Vicente, Los Angeles, CA 90049. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of redesign of a 168 unit residence Inn, with restaurant and a gas station. LOCATION: Northeast corner of Highway ill and Deep Canyon Road. ZONE: PR-5, N.S.P. and PC (4) S.P. --=--------------------------------------------------------------------------- Upon reviewing the submitted plans and presentations by staff and by the applicant, the architectural commission granted preliminary approval subject ,to conditions. HOTEL ONLY Date of Action: October 14, 1986 Vote: Carried 4-0 (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen ( 15) days of the date of the decision. ) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ STAFF COMMENTS: Please read the attached minutes. r MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION OCTOBER 14, 1986 The applicant suggested that he put only Alkobar ' on the signs and leave out the "liquor". It was moved by Commissioner Drury, seconded by Commissioner Martin to approve the proposed signs with the wording "Alkobar" only in red script lettering. Carried 4-0 B. Preliminary Plans: 1. CASE NO: 317 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): THOMAS MILLER for Residence Inn, 11753 San Vicente, Los Angeles, CA 90049. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT• Preliminary approval of redesign of a 168 unit residence inn, with restaurant and a gas station. LOCATION: Northeast corner of Highway 111 and Deep Canyon Road. ZONE: PR-5, N.S.P. and PC (4) S.P. RESIDENCE INN Ms. Sass outlined the changes that had been made to the plans. Commissioner Drury questioned the height requirement for this site. Mr. Diaz indicated that the PC 4 zone was now limited to a 30' height. Ms. Sass noted that the current height is at 32' . Chairman Gregory stated that he was still not satisfied with the architecture. He felt It was a Victorian style design which wasn't appropriate for the desert area. Commissioner Martin felt the design had improved and was superior to the surrounding hotel projects. He questioned Chairman Gregory if his concern was with the steep roof. Chairman Gregory indicated that was a large part of his concern. Mr. Littlejohn, architect, explained that some of the units have mezzanines ( lofts) which require the extra height. Chairman Gregory Indicated the height wasn't his concern, it was the steep slope of the roof. He noted that with heavy landscaping it could be a nice project. 6 MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION OCTOBER 14, 1986 Ms. Sass indicated that a secondary access to Deep Canyon at the north portion of the site will be required. Chairman Gregory stated that he would approve the site plan but would request new elevation drawing and foot prints. It was moved by Commissioner McCrea, seconded by Commissioner Drury to grant preliminary approval of the hotel site plan subject to the following conditions. 1 . New elevations be provided detailing roof pitch. 2. Preliminary landscape plan to be reviewed and approved. 3. Provide a section-through drawing on Deep Canyon and Highway III centerline Into the property. Carried 4-0 MOBIL STATION Ms. Sass explained the items that had been addressed due to concerns from the commission. Commissioner McCrea felt that a darker tan color stucco on the building would be .more appropriate. Mr. Flood, architect, noted they preferred the lighter color but felt that it was open for discussion. Commissioner McCrea made a motion to grant preliminary approval subject to conditions. Chairman Gregory asked if planting could be added around the Mobil Mart. He felt this might mitigate some concerns. Commissioner Martin was still In favor of the industrial type of station and indicated he would vote against the current proposal . He felt that if it was to be t le they should match the architecture of the hotel and be completely village style. Mr. Flood felt they were compromising their design by trying to provide changes city council might want. Commissioner Drury was concerned with the three small structures on the large site. She felt they were out of proportion with the site. 7 r MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION OCTOBER 14, 1986 She was also concerned with the Mobil Mart being located near a restaurant. Mr. Flood explained that they were trying to provide adequate circulation by keeping the structures small . He noted that the restaurant and Mobil Mart had no relation to each other. Commissioner McCrea withdrew his previous motion. Commissioner Martin explained that if the applicant wished to go ahead with the original industrial type of design he would be willing to approve that. It was moved by Commissioner Martin, seconded by Chairman Gregory to grant preliminary approval to the original proposal and site plan subject to the following conditions. 1 . Canopy to have texturized surface. 2. Stucco on buildings to be a muted off-white color. 3. Provide meandering sidewalk around perimeter of site. Carried 2-1- 1 (Commissioner Drury opposed, Commissioner McCrea abstained) . 2. CASE NO: 317 MF APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) : HARRY H. SCHMITZ, P.O. Box 3992, Palm Desert, CA 92261 . NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Seven unit senior apartment project. LOCATION: Santa Rosa Way between San Pascual and Portola Avenue. ZONE: R-3 S.O. Ms. Sass explained that the proposal was for a seven unit senior apartment complex. Chairman Gregory felt the site was crowded and suggested deleting one unit to provide additional open space and landscaping. Commissioner Martin noted that one parking space could also be deleted. 8 I 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNiA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 . October 1 , 1986 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION ACTION CASE NO: 317 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) : THOMAS MILLER for Residence Inn, 11753 San Vicente, . Los Angeles, CA 90049. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of a 168 unit Home-tel Style Inn, with restaurant and a service station as part of concept. LOCATION:. Northeast corner of Highway III and Deep Canyon Road. ZONE: PR-5, N S.P:' and P.C. (4) S.P. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Upon reviewing the submitted plans and presentations by staff and by the applicant, the architectural commission continued both the hotel and gas station portions of the case. Date of Action: September 23, 1986 Vote: Carried 5-0 ' (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen ( 15) days of the date of the decision. ) ----------------------------------------------------=------------------------ STAFF COMMENTS: Please read the attached minutes. MINUTES ARCIIIIECTURAL COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 23, 1986 Chairman Gregory agreed with the use of landscaping to provide additional screening but felt that more than landscaping was needed. rand,-enhanced.r�dh'creeT The architect requested that they return to architectural commission with a new proposal addressing the commission's concerns prior to planning commission review. Commissioner Martin felt the architecture shouldn't have to tie-in with the hotel and stated that he liked the industrial design. lie did feel that city council would be more apt to approve a gas station that would tie-in architecturally with the hotel . It was moved by Commissioner Martin, seconded by Commissioner Drury to continue this case. Carried 5-0 IV. DISCLISSION ITEMS: 1. LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR PARKWAY ON HIGHWAY III BETWEEN LUPINE AND LARKSPUR. Mr. Gregory presented plans and asked for discussion. Commissioner Cook asked why there were no trees in the shopping center parking lot and suggested that some be provided. It was moved by Commissioner Cook, seconded by Commissioner Holden to approve .the plans subject to the addition of trees in the eastern Coco's parking lot. Carried 4-0 (Chairman Gregory abstaining) . 2. ' PIETRO'S Mario DeIGUldice., owner, explained that the proposed upper awning for his restaurant was a recessed awning that would be inside the fascia. Only the valance and 10" of awning will be visible. Fie also requested that the commission reconsider the signage proposed for the small awnings which would be in 6" letters. Chairman Gregory explained that the commission is trying to be consistent on this item by not allowing signage other than the business identification. It was moved by Commissioner Martin, seconded by Commissioner Cook to approve the upper awning and deny the request for lettering on the small awnings. Carried 5-0 6 111 MUTES ARCFIITECTURAL COMMISSIOM SEPTEMBER 23, 1985 Chairman Gregory questioned how the drainage was to work. Mr. Baum explained that they are working on the possibility of directing the r flow to the northwest corner of the site onto Deep Canyon. r/ / Commissioner. Martin felt there were too many medians. Mr. Smith explained that the department of public works was requiring several of the the medians. FThe missioner Holden indicated that lie had been approached by both nning commission and city council members who urged that Che qns fie noted that more'^"'detailed* w!ngs—for.,-the—hote,)--were '-needed apd the`"aln-BulidIng needed tudied. was moved by Commissioner Martin, seconded by Commissioner Drury continue the hotel portion of the project. Carried 5-0 architect for the gas station explained that the architecture of the station is efficient and represents the Mobil image. He asked for the commissions concerns so that he could address them. Chairman Gregory stated that the commission was looking for a village style station that would tie-in with the hotel project or that the station be hidden. Commissioner Holden felt that the station should be unique to our city or it would be denied by planning commission or city council . Commissioner Drury was concerned with the mini market and car wash being located on Highway Ill . The architect explained that there would be moancH.ng--on.-Deep—Eanyoa tha£ o"u"fl'"hut—down� t-he- visibility of the''car""Wash—boi-ltjFric He that they could provide a"^gahle -rooms on the mini market building but felt the canopy should remain as proposed. Commissioner Holden noted that a gas station might not be appropriate for this corner site. He suggested that they give the architect some freedom to design an attractive station. The architect pointed out that. the site grade is three feet below Highway lit and with three feet of additional mounding six feet of the-,car--•wash wi"l17be"-Fridden 0010 f HCd e'+c- 9 S0i�.�ux,A1� v k 5 MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION SEPFEFIBER 23, 1986 Moved by Commissioner Martin, seconded by Commissioner Cook to continue this case so that the above concerns may be addressed. Carried 5-0. 2. CASE NO: 317 C APPLICA.N-i A ANO ADDRF_SSI : THOMAS MILLER for Residence Inn, 11753 San Vicente, Los Angeles, CA 90049. MATURE OF PROJECT/APPr __ L SOl1GFIT: Preliminary approva 1 of a 168 unit Nome-tel Style Inn, with restaurant and a service station as part of concept. LOCATION: Northeast corner of Highway III and Deep Canyon Road. ZONE: PR-5, N S.P. and P.C. (4) S.P. Ms. Sass outlined the changes that had been made since the prior proposal . Commissioner Cook stated that the mairF--building,-dId--not. rP-late.-to the..'other.bUi..ld.ing;, and felt thal: several revisions were needed before architectural approval was granted. Chairman Gregory felt the srchItecture-'deviated" from th'e^generaI .desert.-"fe'oling. The-buildings appear upright-r6ther'thah `l6W ri§e. Mr. Baum indicated that the buildings were within the height limits. Mr. Smith noted that the front and rear portions of the site are j zoned differently and permit different height limi _ he -front 2 . poPtian"pL'r4riits^'35 feet'and"the hear port permit 1 30 fAet. C%) Chairman Gregory felt that the deletion of one tennis court'Improved the site plan .and suggested—creating--addit1onal=open's pace^ that'was .needed.• Commissioner Martin stated that the layout was fine but requested that d" —d 1?T8h 'drawin g^rrunnin g"north"'anii ' south"be­submitted".for r+ev1'ew:9 He felt that the main bui Iding needed revisions and the West,el­eUat'tonTneeded*t6'bd 'eev I eged. Mr. Foster indicated that they would berm 'arid" landscape-^the—west e evation*t6-provlde'"Scr'cenin6 for the parking "lot"[ He agreed that the main building was not complete. 4 c2xff 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 September 1 . 1986 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION ACTION CASE NO: 317 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) : THOMAS MILLER, 11753 San Vicente; Los Angeles, CA- 90049. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of a 168 unit Home-tel Style Inn, with restaurant and a service station as part of concept. LOCATION: Southeast corner of Highway ill and Deep Canyon Road. ZONE: PR-5, N S.P. and P.C. (4) S.P. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Upon reviewing the submitted plans and presentations by staff and by the applicant, the architectural commission continued this case. Date of Action: August 26, 1986 Vote: Carried 4-0 (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen ( 15) days of the date of the decision. ) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ STAFF COMMENTS: Please read the attached minutes. MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION AUGUST 26, 1986 - architecture - Inc luding solar protection and building materials - elevation drawings - height limit - removal of one tennis court to provide staggering of buildings - parking and registration area concerns - elimination of volleyball court - acceptable location for satellite dish - possibility of jogging trail - concrete on gas station - hiding of buildings on station site - increase landscaping and setback on Highway 111 - north/south cross section drawing - enriched hardscape - sufficient parking for restaurant 8 hotel 2. CASE NO: 302 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) : ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY, c/o FRANK WELLS, 4337 Fairlawn Drive, La Canada, CA 91011 . NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Referred for discussion from planning commission. LOCATION: Southwest corner of Portola and Highway 111 . ZONE: C-1 Mr. Drell explained that planning commission felt this proposal should be reviewed by architectural commission again to discuss the architecture. Mr. Wells felt the concerns of planning commission ere the colors and building materials. He noted that the building was to be stucco with red roof tile. Commissioner Holden preferred that a barrel the be used rather than an "S". tile. He was opposed to the fascia being plastic and internally illuminated. He felt the material should be higher quality and non-illuminated. Commissioner Martin suggested that the sharp edges of the 'building be rounded and that a lighter tan color tile be used. Chairman Gregory stated that the band colors should be muted slightly and suggested the fascia be tile. 5 MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION AUGUST 26, 1986 Mr. Littlejohn, architect, indicated that one court could be removed to provide for additional landscaping. Commissioner Martin was opposed to the areas where the buildings were in a straight line and felt they should be staggered. Mr. Diaz noted that the maximum height limit allowed is 30 feet and the applicant is requesting 32 feet. Commissioner Martin suggested deleting the fire places which would bring the height down. He felt that the materials proposed for the building were not suitable for the desert and pointed out that he had concerns with the gas station. Commissioner Holden noted that the form of the building was fine but pointed out that the architecture did not provide for adequate solar protection. Chairman Gregory was concerned with the buildings being located too close together. At the recreation area the surrounding buildings would block the sun from the pool area. He suggested that the one tennis court be removed to provide adequate space for staggering of the buildings. Commissioner Martin felt that the registration building should be at the entrance to the site. He had no objection to the closeness of the buildings. Mr. Diaz noted that it is required that some type of screening be provided for the trash area. Commissioner Martin requested that the vents at the service station show on the plans so that the commission may review the location and screening. He noted that the carwash and cashier buildings should be hidden if possible. He felt the architecture of the gas station did not have to be identical to the hotel . Chairman Gregory questioned if the . south Highway Ill frontage and landscaping could be increased and the car wash moved near the trash area. The applicant indicated that the car wash could be moved north slightly and the frontage and landscaping could be increased. It was moved by Commissioner Holden, seconded by Commissioner Martin to continue this case to allow applicant to review and act on suggestions made by commission. Carried 4-0. The following are items to be addressed. 4 r I MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION AUGUST 26, 1986 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) : MISSION PROPERTIES, 72-221 Highway Ill , A5, Palm Desert, CA 92260. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of new sign program for real estate office. LOCATION: Los Sombras Center ZONE: PC (4) The applicant explained that the colors of the proposed sign would be burgundy and grey and it would be externally lit. Mr. Diaz recommended that the sign be relocated .to the masonry wall in front of the proposed location. Commissioner Holden suggested that the sign be placed 12" below the tope of the wall . Chairman Gregory felt the sign should have some depth to it. He recommended a 2" border. It was moved by Chairman Gregory, seconded by Commissioner Holden to approve the awning as submitted and the sign with the conditions that the sign be located 6" below the top of the masonry wall and it be encased in a minimum 2" frame. Carried 4-0 B. Preliminary Plans: 1. CASE NO: 317 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) : THOMAS MILLER, 11753 San Vicente, Los Angeles, CA 90049. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of a 168 unit Home-tel Style Inn, with restaurant and a service station as part of concept. LOCATION: Southeast corner of Highway 111 and Deep Canyon Road. ZONE: PR-5, N S.P. and P.C. (4) S.P. Ms. Sass outlined the project and reviewed staff's concerns. Chairman Gregory questioned the possibility of deleting one tennis court and relocating one to orient east/west. 3 �2aicTcc..�.� ��c�-d., un�nou�sn �'� �iS •E�Y� ZO yc r cZo er- on in cc-ciecincS = _ nV�c':r '/^.Jr OUrsGai,- i i 1.l;' :^ i _ r=C•i` r=.! ar ery iro ni.ei ai _1 _ Vi C.��C.����v:�3 G C .^i �al ^Ja=n. f'.-'.^il il._- .... .. v __-___••^ i - _..=. ___ ,.^0l2_= un,. l all „ ' -_-_ y ^r• . _ - _c envilV il.2n_al CSJe �L.erly is J MAT-ON: 1 . Narne, aCCr— and 7 2-Iacnone nur,—, 07 011ri2 -_ spanscr: v11'CJ5 • C. Naiue> aCC r2ss and `=i 2Dn0i12 n,mT , r Oi Person CO pe COn=:"C=r; C 2"nina the prc„>'•t (sUC:1 as drC^1L2C_ �ng1n221-,or C�h2r s>il�a�ive) :•p�/—y�. gum�L-a'_ ry'?/ �Y.,1f'Q[`.`d�7��Clrrt'�7 6-lVl..l'� r• I...0 IiJ 1.J l•i na:l:a C I rC�=. ( 1 1 =n�) . � .__ V._--•V11 � r 4r=�.� Cr r v._1 IC'-.. _ IJii� Z. �= or floc and -s �' �2� _1 - -`r rc�lh PsZI, 02 L O. Prp.ppse" use of �e (project for whj cn' r,=, r 2!7� i^sGesCrli2 :h2 LCtal Unce -=San^, n0t jus, aapproval Lainngsoucnz) : 5 �9 DT�l Cl ? -ow :.^pis re i u,ari=S pl a" Znne^ , or now UnCc. rlZ`/•, cC Vi .'. , ___ > :.a`/_;CC- �. List ant tascr—e any CLnar cola.':i •or•_•-_ ter•..: •_a.: r �, . - ,•. _c ZnC Cana:" pU.�ii iC 3CC`C`i a: S u , r Cr MS projaC:, to co zo^.la rC, r,-! in c� by a Cit' Re _ 9 yr -_i C•riZl > J�a=? Z.^.o aS=_ral Znonc:-2Ssecuent ( 7nC1C==a Sl;' oval aganCy rare, anc _ype or - rovai r�^uira o, Pr _j in So. 7.. a^Y n 10. Present Toni^ — g„g: 1 lJ,..0 C052d 11 . Ganeral Plan iand use d=_Sicna_;cn : 12. CxiS ing use CT trig prof-[ s—e: VAz&-J { iG. Existing use on adjacent' proparties : _tarcie - iVor:�, nocCin South, Single fariily D'Nelll,^,^ys • -, VZCa, - 1 o i=. :i topography Tj— r", 1 �. Ara anv or acl7acenZ to C:,e^p cp�r_y y-S s =.,• c,;cn or lc. radire (astira a ruroer or C..r C yar s o= 17. List the number, sice ar,d type or tra=s Cain M f2f USA 13. Descri be any cUl tural iris to rlC or st_nic a p�C_s of ne prc e-- Si _ - R*e 2 C -7 - PFS)DFVCU itWJ 1`l L�0 -1, 19. R..2, c a o. (9; not resc-. t .ai co iJCT rsver r.. NUi'Cer and , :a Cf G':ie ? ;nc (_v=_ ,' vi A 2 'O a� ���{{+ J► tea / {.'�/j ✓V 1 �F (` 26 crAn� C. Nu:,ider CT stcries -TWO :-eicnt D. La r;<_t S1nGl? build-Ink (SC. Type of household si-e =x (cccuia ion prC attics for t=e project) :_ Cescr4l e na nnGwe.r and ty'='_ of r=_Crea"1C.^.al TaCi1 itic_ . T 2 awn nhr�11 t�s �!1 �s�Yslt, P�TTin77� L. T.i -.^i�r� any nC:nt ice _ - ny �- -^� ur•..J�_(-_• Y[� n. ^:a^Ce Ofi ..a . c= - . .._s or . ..s : ��-Jl�/,�^ /�yo�. ��j �g�CI� tL/S7 �y ui 'L�. ILrJItvJ G^�� +tU �RiTc� �� Davinc, -Inc 1uding s:. 00=S. (�I5,(vpcSP LanG�Cap1nC, (1_•'ip .c;.. �..t'Cn .fires CZ�gI ✓1). n b� 1 )4 L , a or .-t. IyOe oT u5a(S) and -"nC.Cn(s) li Office- , SC2�i'V nu-uer; : i1/1G� �CATbD►U C4� l7y :;u-=er c; baiic'. - - CA-P_ WASA 7 ck-_�> D. Lar_=sr singie building ( , _. ) C. I'luli er of Square fee: in ou l-Or S=Or'_gC area : IC�aI nuTiOer of required Oarkinc Spares nu-cer provided C. L-cllrs of operation: ria Xii:.um nu^je" o, c ienLs, pazrons , Shoo Ders , ❑=C. , a= One = .-- . I . Maximum i U^,ber C' ?i 7love=-s a: ore J. pa-ron sea�ine is invo ye�,, - - rw-,:ar K. iS =..era any ni i ' , _ • _ _ =_ ,- c; tq=al =_ _evq==q =_. �. J5 60i4COSF, °wilding ©Z raving, including street.. . . . . . . . . . 7 y 13� Lar.cSc=_piny and Coen Spac (�e =_cre_�icn ) , 20A Cor�.2rciai . Industrial , i^s`i` " cnal or Ot=,2r PrOje- A. Type or use(s) and maior =unction(s) ( ii 0r7ices , specify type & number) : �T�V1`-��\J1' �. Ii UinDer of SgUare ifee t In tO tal bU'.iding area : ��so C. Number of stories Heignt �� �'� mr. 1 D. Largest single building (Sc. ;t. ) E. Number or square i22t in outdoor s Cr are-- : Total number or required parking spaces number provided Q*y G: Hours or operation: (c-> 4rA -ro I Z AIDJ1(;I+t � T1 H. Maximum number of cii2nts, patrons , shoppers , eLc at One ti m2: I. Maximum number of employees at one time: J. - If patron seating is invclved, state_ the number: K. Is there any night lichtine of _he project: Yes NO L. Percent o� total project devoted t0 : Building . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Paving, including streets. . . . . . . . . . a Landscaping and Open Space (Recreation) . . . '�j ;re_ fGi;ic,�ing _e-s ac _acle =- - UiscUSs celo'w alb ite75 C.^,2._::c y=S (.;.__�. _ _ -d, -- -�- • - •_nal Y=S 'iu 21 . C'- nge in existing ic3L r2s GT r:i I Isl•_�S , / 0r sU OS tar.t.al alteration, of ground V/gr COnt., rS. _2. C nge in t:ne Oust, =Sn, :_J^S / iri t:-ecro;ect vicinity. V _... 01- C i 7 " Gr Gdl"- 24. Chance_ in cround water quality or quantity, or alteration of existing drainage pattarns. 2 Chance in existing noise or vibration level in the vicinity. Subject to roadway or airport noise (has -:ne required acoustical report been 27. involves the USa or disposal of Ootenti 'j-jy ha_arcous materials, such as toxic substances , rlammmmuies or eXGlGsiveS. " 2i involves the use of SUOS t'_ntl al a,TdJ Uni=S" Oi _ / ruai or ene` -y. V 2S. Chances demand fcr munilc4zal (pol ,Ce, fire, 2-0. thGs2 ,.,rose❑tiy a`iaila_ic : i - � ne'r iutUre. I { 30. Si`cnificntly affects any unique or mat r_i features, including- mature trees. 3i . Chance in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or oubiic land or public roads. V :2. Results in the dislocation of oeople. 6 W7 v_s ;G Con era is COr:C"O V=rsy bas'_o on a'_s=.la_cs or - /� other T9'__llres of :h-- pro,;?=:. ,/ ;dui Lionel CXolanaLlon oT °yos° ans-aers C' 1. -.: _-,: i 'rye ro ,/ CarLiT': '.;aL .`c _ =no in C..3 aLCi_.^:aQ ?X.'7l :iC= ^" _ - _ r; ": ea__ and ic , r= r- Tor ti11 initial eva� uaLion -_ ^e^� ap,CJ_ o _ 0 , �,y abi 1irY, ,acts , staL>_nerm and in'or-aLion preser:Lad are true and ucorr_C_ - - besL o-I ry,know-ledee and belie`. y IL 5TL Nam (Prinz or Type) : or —5��6 C'-, .- 2O; i nazure —77 X17h this f 01-:n i INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM City of Palm Desert TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: CATHERINE SASS DATE: DECEMBER 2, 1986 SUBJECT: THOMAS MILLER, PP 86-45 The above continued case was to address five items: ll : Drainage Grading 3. Noise generation from air conditioning unit placement 4. Noise generation from car wash 5. A unique village-style architecture to the Mobil Station ♦ To date items I and 2 have been addressed. Item 3 will be addressed by the architectural commission prior to final approval . Item 4 has not been submitted by the applicant. Item 5 has been submitted and will require further modification. Staff was prepared to present a recommendation on this case, however, a new modified site plan was delivered late afternoon November 25. Staff has determined that changes may be sufficient to warrant further study, therefore, recommends this case be continued. j CATHERINE SASS ASSISTANT PLANNER CS/tm i 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NOTICE OF ACTION Date: November 19, 19B6. Thomas Miller Sandy Baum 11753 San Vincente P.O. Box 1739 Los Angeles, CA 90049 Palm Desert, CA 92261 Re: PP 86-45 The Planning Commission of the Cityof Palm Desert has considered our request Y 9 and taken the following action at its meeting of November 18, 1986. CONTINUED TO DECEMBER 2, 1986. CARRIED 4-0. Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Community Development, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen ( 15) days of the date of the decision.4RAMONA D AZ, SECR TA PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION RAD/tm G$�f�'07 o0 nP�n=L IlD®=(�ozr{h, 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NOTICE OF ACTION Date: November 6, 1986 Thomas Miller 11753 San Vincente Los Angeles, CA 90049 Re: PP 86-45 The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of November 4, 1986. CONTINUED TO NOVEMBER 18, 1986 AT 7:00 P.M. CARRIED 4-1 (RICHARDS VOTED NO). Any appeal of the above action may be. made in writing to the Director of Community Development, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen ( 15) days of the date of the decision. RAMO1 A. DIAZ, SECR'�TA`�W PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION RAD/tm J MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION NOVEMBER 4, 1966 Moved by Commissioner Downs , seconded by Commissioner Whitlock, adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 1190, approving PP 86-44 and C/Z 86-7, subject to conditions. Carried 5-0. A FIVE MINUTE RECESS WAS CALLED AT 8: 15 P.M. D. Case No:�PP 86-�- THOMAS MILLER, Applicant Request for approval of a negative declaration of environmental impact and a precise plan of design to allow construction of 168 unit inn, a full service restaurant and a gas station on 10 acres in the PC (4) S.P. and PR-5 N, S.P. at the northeast corner of Highway III and Deep Canyon Road. Ms. Sass outlined the salient points of the staff report and noted that conditions had been added per Hidden Palms homeowners' concerns. Staff recommended approval . Commissioner Downs asked for clarification on the service provided by the gas station market. Ms. Sass replied that small items and soda pop would be provided, but not as full a service as a convenience store. Chairman Crites asked if there were any objections to burying the car wash in a berm. Ms. Sass did not see any problem and indicated that architectural commission suggested berming and noted that it would return to architectural commission for final approval . Chairman Crites opened the public testimony and asked if the applicant to address the commission. MR. SANDY BAUM, 45-800 Deep Canyon, indicated he had been working on site for three years and felt it would he compatible. He indicated that he had met with Hidden Palms on October 18. Commissioner Downs asked if he had met with any other homeowners besides Hidden Palms. Mr. Baum replied no, but indicated that the recess gave them an opportunity to review the plans. MR. BOB FOSTER, developer for Residence Inn, stated that the project meets the criteria of zoning and indicated that they were working diligently to meet the requirements of the architectural commission. He. noted that there would be 22% building coverage and 50% open space provided. He stated that 9 I MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION NOVEMBER 4, 1986 he would work with staff to comply with conditions . Commissioner Richards asked if there was anything unique about this particular Residence Inn, Mr. Foster replied that the Inns are all the same. Commissioner Richards recommended that the applicant study the buildings to the west for tile and arch designs, as well as Hidden Palms architecture. Mr. Foster indicated that he was trying to achieve a design to make most people happy as long as he could retain the basic floor plan. Commissioner Whitlock asked if the gate house provided security. Mr . Foster replied that it was a registration office. Commissioner Whitlock asked for and received clarification regarding services provided by the restaurant, the usable balcony condition, and air conditioning units. Chairman Crites asked about a provision of a water feature, citing Embassy Suites as an example. Mr. Foster indicated that with the Art in Public Places provision, some kind of detail would be provided. MR. DAVID FLOOD, Santa Monica. described the service station and car wash services. He indicated that the car wash would only be open during daylight hours . He stated that the buildings would he very simple in design with a motto of less is more. He indicated concurrence with the staff report and asked for approval . Commissioner Richards suggested a more unique village style architecture. Mr. Flood replied that a residential look might be inappropriate on a commercial street, would block views , and would he distracting from a simple- looking facility; he felt that a village look would destroy the efficiency of the building. Chairman Crites stated that since this would be the first building on the highway, the proposed design would not fit in with the city. Mr. Flood indicated that he felt that landscaping was more important, but was willing to respond to the needs of the city. Commissioner Richards suggested that the applicant study the project on Country Club Drive and Monterey Avenue to provide a design that would be compatible with the rest of the city. Chairman Crites asked if anyone present wished to speak in FAVOR or OPPOSITION to the proposed. MR. GERRIT GOUDSWAARD, 44-755 Deep Canyon, felt that this was a very difficult corner and that while the hotel would provide a significant improvement, any access onto Deep Canyon would create problems. He also stated that there was no such thing as a quiet service station and recommended that the car wash be eliminated. Chairman Crites asked the applicant if he was providing blow dryers and if he could provide noise standard 10 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION NOVEMBER 4, 1986 data. Mr. Flood replied that there were a few blowers inside, but it was basically a drip dry setup and also indicated that he did not have noise data at this time. MR. RICHARD WELBY, Desert 5un Apartments to the west, spoke regarding the access off of Alessandro and the horrendous problems because of narrowness. Mr. Folkers stated that the intersection of Alessandro and Deep Canyon would be right-turn in and right-turn out of the complex if a problem develops. Mr. Folkers also stated that a super block concept was being studied. Chairman Crites asked Mr. Folkers what he would recommend as a condition of approval to stipulate this. Mr. Folkers replied that it was already provided. MR. VIC EFFINGER, 44-539 Sorrento Court, indicated that he was a member of the board of the homeowners association. He stated that he met with Mr. Foster and advised that he meet with the homeowners in February and he had agreed. He expressed concern with traffic in and out onto Deep Canyon and felt that the bushes and trees seriously blocked the view. He stated that the architectural design of the station did not fit in with their housing development or the other buildings. He also expressed concern over noise from the car wash and service station. MR. KEN STENDELL , 44-67.5 Monaro Circle, informed commission that he bought his house two and a half years ago and has been looking forward to a project such as this. He expressed concern regarding the grading level to the north because of drainage, security during construction, suggested an alternate route and location for garbage disposal , indicated that this project should not have a PA system like Embassy Suites that can be heard on Saturdays and Sundays, the project should comply with the city's 30 foot height requirement, and asked about the gas station business hours . Mr. Flood replied 24 hours. Commissioner Richards indicated that hours of operation could be limited. Mr. Diaz stated that security during construction could be helped by requiring a fence to screen the construction site and felt that the trash Pnr.losures might he located in the southeast portion of the site. Mr. Diaz indicated that a condition be. placed that. the PA system have limited hours, indicated that the drainage issue could not be addressed at this time. Mr. Foster repl led that someone would be on duty at night and that there should not be a problem with the PA system. He indicated that i MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION NOVEMBER 4, 1986 he was meeting with Haver & Associates and Mr. Folkers to resolve the drainage issue. Commissioner Richards noted that the cost for hook-up to the storm drain was a seven figure number. Mr. Foster replied that the city might participate and that there was discussion regarding water retention. Mr. Foster also indicated that there were no plans to change the elevation to effect the homeowners in the rear. Mr. Folkers indicated that with the increasing concern for elevations, they would look at Hidden Palms' elevation so that there wouldn't be any controversy. Mr. Folkers also concurred that storm drain hook-up was a seven figure number and that negotiations were under way with Indian Wells, but was moving slowly. He indicated that water would not be a problem to Hidden Palms but indicated that the Las Lagos area was still under study. Commissioner Rj-q har requested more input regarding grading and placing a condition that grading w44L not be rais more than one foot. Mr. Folkers replied that this w d not be a pro�I m. Commissioner Richards felt the developer or architect should be Involved. Commissioner Erwood stated that the concerns were noise, air conditioning units, car wash and recommended that a sound study be done and a study of traffic on Deep Canyon. He also felt that the design of the gas station could be improved. He felt that the applicant would be a good neighbor and would work with staff. He recommended a two week continuance. Commissioner Whitlock agreed with the two week continuance. Commissioner Richards noted that the project would be along Highway Ill and felt that a noise study was not needed and that the air conditioning units should not be a problem--architectural commission would review them. Regarding traffic, he felt that public works would work on It and drainage was being studied. Action: Moved by Commissioner Erwood, seconded by Commissioner Whitlock, continuing PP 86-45 to November 18, 1986. . Carried 4-1 (Commissioner Richards voting no) . , Commissioner Richards noted that a full Environmental Impact Report had been completed for this area which could provide information. 12 — I e CITY OF PALM DESERT DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT TO: PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: NOVEMBER 4, 1986 CASE NO: PP 86-45 REQUEST: Approval of a negative declaration of environmental impact and a precise plan of design to allow construction of 168 unit inn, a full service restaurant and a gas station on 10 acres in the PC (4) S.P. and PR-5 N, S.P. at the northeast corner of Highway III and Deep Canyon Road. APPLICANT: Thomas Miller Suncastle Real Estate 11753 San Vincente P.O. Box 1739 Los Angeles, CA 90049 Palm Desert, CA 92261 1. BACKGROUND: A. DESCRIPTION OF SITE: The ten acre site is vacant, relatively flat and sloping to the north. There have been no street improvements to date. A date palm grove bounds the north end of the parcels. B. ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE: NORTH: PR-5, N/Hidden Palms SOUTH: C-1 SP/Highway III , across highway is commercial EAST: PC (4) N, SP/Embassy Suites 'hotel WEST: C-1 , SP and R-3 (4) and R-1 13,000/across Deep Canyon Road C. GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION: Resort commercial and medium density residential . 11 . ZONING STANDARD: Requirement Provision d.u./ac 18 18 perimeter setback 20 ft. 60 ft. parking spaces 275 278 max. bldg. height 30 ft. max. 30 ft. building coverage 50% max. 22% open space 40% min. 57% min. project area 10 acres 10 acres min. building separation 10 ft. 10 ft. PP 86-45 CONTINUED NOVEMBER 4, 1986 The parking requirement Is for 1 . 1 space per unit for the inn ( 185 spaces) and 90 spaces for the restaurant. The site plan has provided 178 spaces for the inn and 100 spaces for the restaurant. III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A. GENERAL SITE DESIGN: The proposed project consists of three integrated sections. The focus of the project is a 168 unit inn designed for use by a client who typically needs hotel type facilities for longer periods than the average traveler. An average stay of nine days is figured by the industry. Consequently, a more home-like environment is attempted by the use of suites with kitchens incorporated into the design. The inn extends over the northern 7 112 acres of the site. Buildings are two-story eight plexes with 504 square foot studios and 828 square foot penthouses. A service station with a car wash takes up approximately one acre of the southwest corner. A full service restaurant is planned on the southeast parcel to provide the required room service. At this time a building pad is provided, with the operator to be secured later. The major amenity focus is tennis with five courts clustered in the center of the inn's grounds. A formal pool and informal pool , as well as a gate house, are included in the project. B. CIRCULATION, PARKING AND ACCESS: The integration of the three sections of this project is dependent on a good circulation pattern. Access is achieved from Highway Ill by right hand turn only, and from Deep Canyon Road. Medians and landscaping techniques assist to direct traffic flow. A secondary access to Deep Canyon will be provided near the northerly project boundary. C. ARCHITECTURE: The architectural style of the restaurant and gas station will reflect that of the inn. The applicant has modified a victorian style architecture popular with Residence Inn to reflect a style popular to the desert. The two story structures have spanish influence of orange the roofs and a light color stucco. Staff has been concerned with the appropriateness of the architectural style and remains concerned with the steep pitch of the roof. The 2 PP 86-45 CONTINUED NOVEMBER 4, 1986 applicant has been directed to lower the roof pitch to meet height restrictions for this zone and to satisfy the design review board's concerns by submitting new elevations for their review and final approval . D. LANDSCAPING: Date palms are required to be the predominant feature of the landscape plan to comply with city ordinance in a natural factors overlay zone. The landscape setback on Highway III will match that of the neighboring development to the east, providing 40 feet Including the meandering sidewalk. The frontage on Deep Canyon Road will provide for a pedestrian sidewalk and be landscaped to be compatible with the neighboring development to the north providing 40 feet on this landscape easement. Additional landscaped medians are provided to support traffic circulation between the three elements of the proposed precise plan. IV. ANALYSIS. A. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL OF A PRECISE PLAN: 1 . The design of the precise plan will not substantially depreciate property values nor be materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. Justification: The design of the project is acceptable, has architectural preliminary approval , and meets applicable code requirements for this type of facility. 2. The precise plan will not unreasonably interfere with the use of and enjoyment of property in the vicinity by the occupants thereof for lawful purposes. Justification: The surrounding zoning is compatible with the use as proposed and adjacent owners would not be deprived the use of their land or be negatively impacted by this development. 3. The precise plan will not endanger the public peace, health, safety, or general welfare. 3 PP 86-45 CONTINUED NOVEMBER 4, 1986 Justification: The project is designed in a manner that will not endanger the public peace, health, safety, or general welfare due to compliance with code requirements and compatibility with surrounding properties. B. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The director of community development has determined that the proposed project will not have an adverse impact on the environment and a negative declaration of environmental impact has been prepared. V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff finds the project is acceptable and with the conditions proposed by staff will be compatible with surrounding properties. Therefore, staff recommends: A. Adoption of the findings. B. Adoption of Planning Commission Resolution No. approving PP 86-45, subject to attached conditions. VI. ATTACHMENTS: A. Draft resolution. B. Legal notice. C. Negative declaration. D. Exhibits. Prepared by �C7, Reviewed and Approved by /tm 4 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PRECISE PLAN OF DESIGN TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A 168 UNIT INN, A FULL SERVICE RESTAURANT AND A GAS STATION ON 10 ACRES IN THE PC (4) S.P. AND PR-5 N, S.P. ZONE AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF HIGHWAY Ill AND DEEP CANYON ROAD. CASE NO. PP 86-45 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 4th day of November, 1986, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider the request of THOMAS MILLER for the above described project; and WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedure for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 80-89, " in that the director of community development has determined that the project will not have a significant environmental impact and a negative declaration is hereby certified; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said planning commission did find the following facts and reasons to exist to justify granting approval of said precise plan: 1 . The design of the precise plan will not substantially depreciate property values in the vicinity. 2. The precise plan will not unreasonably interfere with the use or enjoyment of property in the vicinity by the occupants thereof for lawful purposes. 3. The precise plan will not endanger the public peace, health, safety or general welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1 . That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the commission in this case; 2. That approval of Precise Plan 86-45 is hereby granted for reasons subject to the attached conditions. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 4th day of November, 1986, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: BUFORD CRITES, Chairman ATTEST: RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary /tm 2 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO. PP 86-45 Department of Community Development: 1. The development of the property shall conform substantially with exhibits on file with the department of community development/planning, as modified by the following conditions. 2. Construction of a portion of said project shall commence within one year from the date of final approval unless an extension of time is granted; otherwise said approval shall become null , void and of no effect whatsoever. 3. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein which are in addition to all municipal ordinances and state and federal statutes now in force, or which hereafter may be in force. 4. Prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contemplated by this approval , the applicant shall first obtain permits and/or clearance from the following agencies: Coachella Valley Water District Palm Desert Architectural Commission City Fire Marshal Public Works Department Palm Desert Water 8 Services District Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to the department of building and safety at the time of issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. 5. The hotel shall provide solid-core or steel doors equipped with dead bolt locks, door viewers and latch guards. 6. The addressing of the rooms should use even numbers to the left and odd numbers to the right to assist emergency vehicles in locating rooms. 7. Access to Highway III must be approved by Caltrans and City of Palm Desert Public Works department. 8. The requested assurances from the developer by the Hidden Palms Homeowners Association will become conditions of approval , and have been expressed as follows: 3 L PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. I a. That there be no usable balconies on the north side of their property facing toward Hidden Palms. b. Confirmation of the 124 foot setback from the building line to the Hidden Palms wall . C. That a minimum of two rows of existing date palms remain as a barrier between the Hidden Palms wall and the proposed parking area. d. That additional planting be done under the date palm barrier to a height capable of softening the effect of only seeing the palm tree trunks from Hidden Palms. e. That they prefer tile to be used at the gas station building, rather than metal . f. That no obtrusive lighting be done on the north side to illuminate the hot water building, parking area or planned amenities. g. That the trash enclosure be moved from the northwest corner for noise and odor consideration. Department of Public Monks: 1. Drainage and signalization fund fees, as required by city ordinance, shall be paid prior to grading permit issuance. 2. Drainage facilities shall be provided, per Ordinance No. 218 and the Master Drainage Plan, to the specifications of the director of public works. 3. Storm drain construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study by the private engineer that is approved by the department of public works. 4. Full public improvements, including traffic safety lighting, as required by ordinance and the director of public works, shall be installed in accordance with city standards. 5. Complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the city engineer for checking and approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. The engineer shall submit "as-built" plans prior to the acceptance of the improvements by the city. 6. All private driveways and parking lots shall be inspected by the engineering department and a standard inspection fee shall be paid prior to grading permit issuance. 4 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 7. Landscaping maintenance on Highway 111 and Deep Canyon Road shall be provided by the property owner. 8. Existing utilities on Highway III and Deep Canyon Road shall be undergrounded per each respective utility district's recommendation. If determined to be unfeasible applicant shall agree to participate in any future utility undergrounding district. 9. Traffic safety striping on Highway III and Deep Canyon Road shall be provided to the specifications of the director of public works. A traffic control plan must be submitted to and approved by the director of public works before placing pavement markings. 10. Complete grading plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the city engineer for checking and approval prior to issuance of any permits. 11 . Dedication of 55 feet of right-of-way on Highway III shall be done prior to issuance of any permits and approval of plans. 12. Installation of curb and gutter, matching paving and 8 foot meandering sidewalk on Highway III and Deep Canyon Road. 13. Offsite improvement plans to be approved by public works department and a surety posted to guarantee the required offsite improvements prior to grading permit issuance. 14. Installation of one-half landscaped median in Highway Ill or cash payment for one-half the cost of landscaped median at the option of the director of public works. 15. Traffic analysis to the prepared for the project to address the specific impacts on existing networks (street and intersections) and the proposed mitigation measures recommended for approval by the city. 16. Size, number and location of driveways to public works specifications with only three driveway approaches to be allowed to serve this property. 17. Complete parcel map shall be submitted as required by ordinance to the director of public works for checking and approval and be recorded before issuance of any permits. 18. Any and all off-site improvements shall be preceded by the approval of plans and the issuance of valid encroachment permit(s) by the department of public works. 19. A complete preliminary soils investigation, conducted by a registered 5 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. soils engineer, shall be submitted to and approved by the department of public works prior to issuance of the grading permit. 20. Access to Highway 111 shall be restricted through raised medians, to right turn ingress and egress. 21 . Applicant shall modify site plan to provide a secondary access to Deep Canyon Road at the northerly project boundary, minimum width of 24 feet. 22. Applicant shall provide for bus turnout on Highway Ill to the satisfaction of the director of public works and Sunline Transit Agency. 23. Applicant shall construct all improvements within the state right-of-way to Caltrans standards. 24. Median islands at both project entrances as shown on the project site plan shall be continuous and extend into driveways far enough to preclude/minimize potential vehicle conflict. 25. If traffic conflicts develop as determined by the director of public works, at the most southerly driveway on Deep Canyon Road applicant shall modify drive to restrict movements to right turn ingress/egress only. City Fire Marshal : 1. Install a water system capable of delivering 3000 GPM fire flow from any fire hydrant for a three hour duration in addition to domestic supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement. 2. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants so that no point of any building is more than 200 feet from a fire hydrant measured along approved vehicular travel ways. a. exterior surfaces of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow, and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. b. curbs shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. C. hydrants shall not be located closer than 25 feet to any building. 3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and two copies of the water system plan to the fire marshal for review. Upon approval , one copy will be sent to the building department, and the original will be returned to the developer. 6 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 4. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and approved by the water company, with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system in Case No. PP 86-45 is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the fire marshal ." 5. Prior to delivery of combustible materials to the building site, the required water system shall be installed, operating, and delivering the required flow. 6. Additional fire protection requirements may be necessary when the applicant submits specific plans for consideration and approval . 7. All building over 5000 square feet require an approved fire sprinkler system. 8. All three story buildings must have a fire marshal approved fire alarm system. 7 CUf0blF o:ff IF'ennnua 11DcNiz(�?zP12o 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 October 10, 1986 CITY OF PALM DESERT .,. LEGAL NOTICE CASE NO. PP 86-45 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by THOMAS MILLER for RESIDENCE INN to construct a 168 unit Inn, a restaurant and a gas station on the north- east corner of Highway III and Deep Canyon Road, also described as: APN 625-100-004, 006, 015, 016 021, 022 '�"-ill I 1�-- I Y P I I I ',.�- • " 4 _LIl2`J.f!11LLllE. -3I R � °`�pIS.,1�y b�T:I� I t 3.0. - IqP ez n,e Rig Q R:I R 5 P R-1 R'-, �� pa R I , ! R 1 fi I R♦ R I R •', FC.I.I,N S.P. _ I K I O k M A r t 9P J1C 19P, C SP .C-p SP IC-1:9P C-1'$R CI's_P. [ CS 5P P[.IJIS.P. R C-1 ICI _C1 P 'G.J R-J 0R�11111 .. �IrP21 R-31J1 p.fl 9 R JI<I R 3'so UC I C-1 P x'JIJI ql q] R]V., I}I. 31E1 R 1pl� O R-3 IJ 000 131 R 3 Mo.2 13, �I�1 R- 12 000 oee R I R SFI Rr p 000 .. P R. 4•••. I R-1 20.000 R 1 I6;000 , SCUP 01.2.Ppll C R R 11000p - R-1 30 C00 - R-120.000 1`e II�� R-I R R 1 M COb' '• C UPpJD .i 1 PL.1 -R-I.2D W0 RY2D 000 O SPr � RI 30'Coo RI R. R O Rll R JIJI - R-I O.S. ,xm.x wlus nr.uR.. A O.S. SAID public hearing wlII be held on Tuesday, November 4, 1966 at 7:00 p.m. In the Council Chamber at the Palm Desert City Hall, 73-510 Fred Waring Drive. Palm Desert, Cal lfornia, at which time and place all interested. persons are Invited to attend and be heard. If you challenge the proposed actions In court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the Public hearing described In this notice, or In written correspondence delivered to the city council (or planning commission) at, or prior to, the public hearing. PUBLISH: Desert Post RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary October 24, 1986 Palm Desert Planning Commission 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 Pursuant to Title 14, Division 6, Article 7, Section 15083, of the California Administrative Code. NEGATIVE DECLARATION CASE NO: PP 86-45, RESIDENCE INN APPLICANT/PROJECT SPONSOR: THOMAS MILLER 11753 San Vincente Los Angeles, CA 90049 PROJECT DESCRIPTION/LOCATION: 168 unit inn, a full service restaurant and gas station .on 10 acres in PC (4) S.P. and PR-5, N, S.P. at the northeast corner of Highway III and Deep Canyon Road. The Director of the Department of Community Development, City of Palm Desert, California, has found that the described project will not have a significant effect on the environment. A copy of the Initial Study has been attached to document the reasons in support of this finding. Mitigation measures, if any, included in the project to avoid potentially significant effects, may also be found attached. ---------------------------------------- RAMON A. DIAZ DATE DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT /tm �PRGPERTY MANAGEMENT, INC. (619) 340 4164 24 Hr. 73-260 El Paseo, Suite 3A, Palm Desert, CA 92260 October 24 , 1986 Mr. Ramon A. Diaz , Secretary t� '\ '�e � Palm Desert Planning Commission k L".� City of Palm Desert OCT 2 9 73-510 Fred Waring Drive 1986 Palm Desert, California 92260 COMMUIJIT'! DEVELOPMENT GEPARTMEidT CITY Of PALM DESERT RE: PP 86-45 Dear Mr. Diaz : A presentation was made to the Board of Directors of Hidden Palms Homeowners Association by the developers of the planned Inn, restaurant and gas station at the corner of Highway 111 and Deep Canyon Road. The Board of Directors has no objection to the basic concept but would like- the following assurances from the developer kept in mind �if permission to build is granted. 1. That there be no usable balconies on the North side of their property facing toward Hidden Palms . 2 . Confirmation of the 124 foot set back from the building line to :the Hidden Palms wall. 3. That a minimum of two rows of existing date palms remain as a barrier between the Hidden Palms wall and the proposed parking area. 4 . That additional planting be done under the date palm barrier to a height capable of softening the effect of only seeing the palm tree trunks from Hidden Palms . 5 . That they prefer tile to be used at the gas station building, rather than metal. 6 . That no obtrusive lighting be done on the North side to illuminate the hot water building, parking area or planned amenities . 7 . That the trash enclosure be moved from the Northwest corner for noise and odor consideration. All of the above requests are to help those residents of Hidden Palms along the back wall of the proposed development to maintain the quiet enjoyment of their property. Sincerely, Dick Smart, President HIDDEN PALMS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION Regional Offices Irvine . Rancho Cucamonga • San Clemente • Brentwood South Bay • Downtown Los Angeles 0 Palm Desert 0 La Jolla 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 Pursuant to Title 14, Division 6, Article 7, Section 15083, of the California Administrative Code. NEGATIVE DECLARATION CASE NO: PP 86-45, RESIDENCE INN APPLICANT/PROJECT SPONSOR: THOMAS MILLER 11753 San Vincente Los Angeles, CA 90049 PROJECT DESCRIPTION/LOCATION: 168 unit inn, a full service restaurant and gas station on 10 acres in PC (4) S.P. and PR-5, N, S.P. at the northeast corner of Highway III and Deep Canyon Road. The Director of the Department of Community Development, City of Palm Desert, California, has found that the described project will not have a significant effect on the environment. A copy of the Initial Study has been attached to document the reasons in support of this finding. Mitigation measures, if any, included in the project to avoid potentially significant effects, may also be found attached. ---------------------------------------- RAMON A. DIAZ DATE DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT /tm INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM City of Palm Desert TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT/PLANNING DATE: NOVEMBER 18, 1986 SUBJECT: CASE NO. PP 86-45 - THOMAS MILLER, APPLICANT Staff did not receive the revised plans in ample time for review and, therefore, staff is requesting a two-week continuance. 4 �L ON DIAZ DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT/PLANNING RAD/tm . == 41 6L �{ \ STATE OF CALIFORNIA—BUSINESS AND TRANSPORTATION AGENCY C.7 \: "{)RM GGEEOORRG�`'bE IAN, Gowmor DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION E® S EP 2 9 1986 DISTRICT 8, P.O. BOX 231 - x L.IY GFVtLC,AI:NT GEVd`;?PENT SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA 92402 .i4.k,G^� C-bevelopment Review? 198 ENGINEERING DEPAR T S� �` � � ����; CITY OF PALMDE��I 'J- //� - 3 �2 ,9 (Date) Co-Rte-PM Ji (Your Reference).PlannnDen� tnent n_SCity pi PalSori 0 780 . BOi 1C90iYal S P - - Thank you for the opportunity to review the proposed �Si�9rrc e -Z iv. 'YI l�iv�o/ SP N/✓[/c P �J cc c'�--- / located vc ov7�t ��S C O v yr Pv' d Please refer to the attached material on which our comments have been indicated by the items checked and/or by those items noted under additional comments. It should be noted that if any work is necessary within the state highway right of way, the developer must obtain an encroachment permit from the District 8 office of the State Department of Transportation prior to beginning the work. If additional information is desired, please call Mr. Patrick M. Connally at (714) 383-4384 . i �" 1 R. G. POT /'s vo District Permits Engineer , p Att. Form 8-PD22 (Rev. 4-86) L O�'/C IjI•-III" SC. /zoo D-V LCPMENT REV-i W FC`M P/"/- / / w -A - f� 7 (Cc-Rte-PM) - (Your P.ererence) WE WOULD LIKE TO NO _ Although the traffic and drainage generated by this proposal do not appear to have a significant effect on the state_ highway system, consideration must be given to the cumulative effect of continued development in this area. Any measures necessary to mitigate the cumulative impact of traffic and drainage should be provided prior to or with development of the area that necessitates them. It appears that the traffic and drainage generated by this proposal could have a significant effect on the state highway system of the area. Any measures necessary to mitigate the traffic and drainage "impacts should be included with the development. .rhis portion of state highway is included in the California Master Plan of State Highways Eligible for Official Scenic Highway Designation, and in the future your agency may wish to have this route officially designated as a state scenic highway. _/N<_ This portion of state hichway has been officially designated as a state scenic highway, and development in this corridor should be compatible with the scenic highway concept. X It is recognized that there is considerable public concern about noise levels adjacent to heavily traveled highways. Land development, in order to be compatible with this concern, may _ require special noise attenuation measures. Development of property should include any necessary noise attenuation. WE RECOMMEND: No rmal right of way dedication to provide b`Ihalf-width on the state highway. )( Normal street improvements to provide 6 2 half-width on the state highway. X Curb and gutter along the state highway, State Standard A2-8. Parking be prohibited along the state highway by painting curb red. I radius curb returns be provided at intersections with the state highway. A standard wheelchair ramp must be provided in the returns. _ Positive vehicular barrier such as AC dike, substantial fence, or physical topographical features be provided to limit access to the state highway. _ Landscaping along the state highway be low and forgiving in nature. vehicular access not be developed directly to the state highway. .* Vehicular access to the state highway be provided by existing public road connections. _ vehicular access to the state highway be provided by standard driveways. Vehicular access to the state highway be provided by a road-type connection. Vehicular access connections be paved at least within the state highway right of way. _ Access points to the state highway be developed in a manner that will provide sight distance adequate for mph along the state highway. - A left-turn lane, including any necessary widening, be provided on the state highway at _ Consideration be given to the provision, or future provision, of signalization and lighting of the intersection of and the state highway. _ A traffic study indicating on- and of`-site flow patterns and volumes, probable impacts, and proposed mitigation measures be prepared. - Adequate off-street parking, which does not require backing onto the state highway, be provided. _ Parking lot be developed in a manner that will not cause any vehicular movement conflicts, including parking stall entrance and exit, within of the entrance from the state highway. Handicap parking not be developed in the busy driveway entrance area. -Z_ Care be taken when developing this property to preserve and perpetuate the existing drainage pattern of the state highway. Particular consideration should be given to cumulative increased storm runoff to insure that a highway drainage problem is not created. Noise attenuation be provided as part of the development of this property. Please refer to attached additional comments. WE WOULD LIKE TO RECEIVE: A copy of any conditions of approval or revised approval. A copy of any documents providing additional state highway right of way. WE WOULD LIKE THE OPPORTUNITY TO REVIEW DURING THE APPROVAL PROCESS: _ Any proposals to further develop this property. A copy of the traffic or environmental study, if required. A check print of the Parcel or Tract Map, if required. �_ A check print of the Street Improvement Plans for the state hichway, if required. Development Review 08-Riv-111-38 . 128 (Co-Rte-PM) Plot Plan 86-43 (Your Reference) ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: Access to this proposal should be through the entrance to the Granada Royale Hometel which was or is being signalized in con unction with the development on the south side of the highway and from Deep Canyon Road. If direct access to the service station from Route 111 is necessary, it shall be by a 25 ' wide entrance only driveway as far from Deep Canyon Road as possible . To insure that this is an entrance only driveway an R11 "Do Not Enter" and an R11A "Wrong Way" sign shall be placed at this driveway facing the parking area. It doesn't appear that the gasoline delivery vehicles can negotiate the turns from the highway to the fuel storage tanks. Please supply the information and/or truck turn templates that will show how access to the tanks will be accomplished. 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO(S) : PP 86-43 PROJECT: Residence Inn APPLICANT: Brown/Miller Development, 11753 San Vincente Blvd. , Los Angeles, CA 90049. Enclosed please find materials describing a project for which the following is being requested: Construction of 168 home-tel style units, a full service restaurant and a gas station with car wash on 10 acres generally located at the northeast corner of Highway III and Deep Canyon Road. The attached data was prepared by the applicant and is being forwarded to you for comments and recommended conditions of approval . The city is interested in the probable impacts on the environment (including land, air, water, minerals, flora, fauna, noise, objects of historical or aesthetic significance) and recommended conditions of approval based on your expertise and area of concern. Your comments and recommended conditions of approval must be received by this office prior to 4:30 p.m. September 12, 1986, in order to be discussed by the . land division committee. The land division committee (comprised of director of community development, city building official , city engineer, fire marshal , and a representative of CVWD) will discuss the comments and recommended conditions of approval and will forward them to the planning commission through the staff report. Any information received by this office after the receipt deadline will not be discussed by the land division committee. Sincerely, ---------------- < -- --- RAMON A. DIAZ v DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT/PLANNING CS/tm Attachments PLEASE RETURN MAP WITH COMMENTS t3 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 September 29, 1986 Mr. Robert C. Foster P.O. Box 1362 Wichita, KS 67201 Dear Mr. Foster: Attached please find a copy of Caltrans conditions as imposed on the .Residence Inn/Mobil Service Station project PP 86-45. ,As per the recent architectural review of the project, we anticipate a redesign submittal for approval at a later date. Staff will defer to Caltrans conditions, therefore, the redesign should include those measures necessary to mitigate stated concerns. I hope this information is helpful in preparing your materials for submittal . Sincerely, CATHERINE SASS, ASSISTANT PLANNER DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT/PLANNING CS/tm Attachment: Caltrans Development Review Form September 18, 1986 cc: Thomas Miller, Applicant Carroll Littlejohn, Architect Sandy Baum, Suncastle Real Estate E ' 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 September I , 1986 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION ACTION CASE NO: 317 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) : THOMAS MILLER, 11753 San Vicente, Los Angeles, CA 90049. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of a 168 unit Home-tel Style Inn, with restaurant and a service station as part of concept. LOCATION: Southeast corner of Highway III and Deep Canyon Road. ZONE: PR-5, N S.P. and P.C. (4) S.P. --------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- Upon reviewing the submitted plans and presentations by staff and ,by the applicant, the architectural commission continued this case. Date of Action: August 26, 1986 Vote: Carried 4-0 (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Citv Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen ( 15) days of the date of the decision. ) ----------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ STAFF COMMENTS: Please read the attached minutes. MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION AUGUST 26, 1986 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): MISSION PROPERTIES, 72-221 Highway Ill , AS, Palm Desert, CA 92260. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of new sign program for real estate office. LOCATION: Los Sombras Center ZONE• PC (4) The applicant explained that the colors of the proposed sign would be burgundy and grey and it would be externally lit. Mr. Diaz recommended that the sign be relocated to the masonry wall in front of the proposed location. Commissioner Holden suggested that the sign be placed 12" below the tope of the wall . Chairman Gregory felt the sign should have some depth to it. He recommended a 2" border. It was moved by Chairman Gregory, seconded by Commissioner Holden to approve the awning as submitted and the sign with the conditions that the sign be located 6" below the top of the masonry wall and it be encased in a minimum 2" frame. Carried 4-0 B. Preliminary Plans: 1. CASE NO: 317 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) : THOMAS MILLER, 11753 San Vicente, Los Angeles, CA 90049. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of . a 168 unit Home-tel Style Inn, with restaurant and a service station as part of concept. LOCATION: Southeast corner of Highway III and Deep Canyon Road. ZONE: PR-5, N S.P. and P.C. (4) S.P. Ms. Sass outlined the project and reviewed staff's concerns. Chairman Gregory questioned the possibility of deleting one tennis court and relocating one to orient east/west. 3 MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION AUGUST 26, 1986 Mr. Littlejohn, architect, indicated that one court could be removed to provide for additional landscaping. Commissioner Martin was opposed to the areas where the buildings were in a straight line and felt they should be staggered. Mr. Diaz noted that the maximum height limit allowed is 30 feet and the applicant is requesting 32 feet. Commissioner Martin suggested deleting the fire places which would bring the height down. He felt that the materials proposed for the building were not suitable for the desert and pointed out that he had concerns with the gas station. Commissioner Holden noted that the form of the building was fine but pointed out that the architecture did not provide for adequate solar protection. Chairman Gregory was concerned with the buildings being located too close together. At the recreation area the surrounding buildings would block the sun from the pool area. He suggested that the one tennis court be removed to provide adequate space for staggering of the buildings. Commissioner Martin felt that the registration building .should be at the entrance to the site. He had no objection to the closeness of the buildings. Mr. Diaz noted that it is required that some type of screening be provided for the trash area. Commissioner Martin requested that the vents at the service station show on the plans so that the commission may review the location and screening. He noted that the carwash and cashier buildings should be hidden if possible. He felt the architecture of the gas station did not have to be identical to the hotel . Chairman Gregory questioned if the south Highway III frontage and landscaping could be increased and the car wash moved near the trash area. The applicant indicated that the car wash could be moved north slightly and the frontage and landscaping could be increased. It was moved by Commissioner Holden, seconded by Commissioner Martin to continue this case to allow applicant to review and act on suggestions made by commission. Carried 4-0. The following are items to be addressed. 4 MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION AUGUST 26, 1986 - architecture - including solar protection and building materials - elevation drawings - height limit - removal of one tennis court to provide staggering of buildings - parking and registration area concerns - elimination of volleyball court - acceptable location for satellite dish - possibility of jogging trail - concrete on gas station - hiding of buildings on station site - increase landscaping and setback on Highway 111 - north/south cross section drawing - enriched hardscape - sufficient parking for restaurant & hotel 2. CASE NO: 302 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) : ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY, c/o FRANK WELLS, 4337 Fairlawn Drive, La Canada, CA 91011 . NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Referred for discussion from planning commission. LOCATION: Southwest corner of Portola and Highway 111 . ZONE: C-1 Mr. Drell explained that planning commission felt this proposal should be reviewed by architectural commission again to discuss the architecture. Mr. Wells felt the concerns of planning commission ere the colors and building materials. He noted that the building was to be stucco with red roof tile. Commissioner Holden preferred that a barrel tile be used rather than an "S"- tile. He was opposed to the fascia being plastic and internally illuminated. He felt the material should be higher quality and non-illuminated. Commissioner Martin suggested that the sharp edges of the building be rounded and that a lighter tan color tile be used. Chairman Gregory stated that the band colors should be muted slightly and suggested the fascia be tile. 5 1 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 October 1 , 1986 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION ACTION CASE NO: 317 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) : THOMAS MILLER for Residence Inn, 11753 San, Vicente, Los Angeles, CA 90049. . NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of a 168 unit Home-tel Style Inn, with restaurant and a service station as part of concept. LOCATION: Northeast corner of Highway Ili and Deep Canyon Road. ZONE: PR-5, N S.P. and P.C. (4) S.P. ------------------- --------------------------------------------- Upon reviewing the submitted plans and presentations by Istaff and by the applicant , the architectural commission continued both the hotel and gas station portions of the case. Date of Action: September 23, 1986 Vote: Carried 5-0 . (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen ( 15) days of the date of the decision. ) STAFF COMMENTS: Please read the attached minutes. MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 23, 1986 Moved by Commissioner Martin, seconded by Commissioner . Cook to continue this case so that the above concerns may be addressed. Carried 5-0. 2. CASE NO: 317 C APPLPCANT (AND ADDRESS) : THOMAS MILLER for Residence Inn, 11753 San Vicente, Los Angeles, CA 90049. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of a 168 unit Home-tel Style Inn, with restaurant and a service station as part of concept. LOCATION: Northeast corner of Highway III and Deep Canyon Road. ZONE: PR-5, N S.P. and P.C. (4) S.P. Ms. Sass outlined the changes that had been made since the prior proposal . Commissioner Cook stated that the_-m_a-ire-bLi4-id-i-ng—d-id7not-re-l-ate to the-other bu_i-l.d-i-ngs,, and felt that several revisions were needed before architectural approval was granted. Chairman Gregory felt the-archi=tectur.e-dev-i`ated=fFoom_thegeneral cdese'rt7f-ea1_i_ng. The_bui;ldings appear-upr-fight-r-ather-than-low rise. Mr. Baum indicated that the buildings were within the height limits. Mr. Smith noted that the front and rear portions of the site are zoned differently and permit different height limi he�front (portion-permits 35=f-eet and�the-rear-portion permit 30 fe t. M Chairman Gregory felt that the deletion of one tennis court mproved the site plan .and suggested-creeti-ng-addi-t-ional--open-spacefthat.:wa5 cneeded? - - - Commissioner Martin stated that the layout was fine but requested that a-—se ct-i.on drawing-runn'i'ngnorthand_-south •be _submitted for ire-Ti-e-w� He felt that the main building needed revisions and the ,ewe st_e l-evat i on7needed-`tobe_rev-i ewed. Mr. Foster indicated that they would iberm—and-landscape---�ther-we_st elev-atian_to_.pr_ov-id --se`creening-for-the-parking lot?` He agreed that the main building was not complete. 4 MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 23, 1986 Chairman Gregory questioned how the drainage was to work. Mr. Baum explained that they are working on the possibility of directing the flow to the northwest corner of the site onto, Deep Canyon. Commissioner Martin felt .there were too many medians. Mr. Smith r explained that the department of public works was requiring several of the the medians. !J Commissioner Holden indicated that he had been approached by both planning commission and city council members who urged that the gas station -have a village style to it. He noted that more detailed - , for the hotel -were needed and the .main building needed restudied. It was moved by Commissioner Martin, seconded by Commissioner Drury_ to continue the hotel portion of the project. Carried 5-0 The architect for the gas station explained that the architecture of the station is efficient and .represents the Mobil image. He asked for the commissions concerns so that he could address them. Chairman Gregory stated that the commission was looking for a village style station that would tie-in with the hotel project or that the station be hidden. Commissioner Hoiden felt that the station should be unique to our city or it would be denied by planning commission or city council . Commissioner Drury was concerned with the mini market and car wash being located on Highway ill . The architect explained that there would be mounding -on Deep Canyon that would cut down the visibility of the car wash building. He noted that they could provide a -gable roof on the mini market building but felt the canopy should remain as proposed. Commissioner Holden noted that a gas station might not be appropriate for this corner site. He suggested that they give the architect some freedom to design an attractive station. The architect pointed out that the site grade is three feet below Highway ill and with three feet of additional mounding six feet of the--ca_r wash-wi l l be hidden., 5 I/ MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 23, 1986 Chairman Gregory agreed with the use of landscaping to provide additional screening but felt that more than landscaping was needed. Ne:suggessted._a-_r_eta-i-a_i-ng_wa 1-1--and—enhanced"%onei�e .The architect requested that they return to architectural commission with a new proposal addressing the commission's concerns prior to planning commission review. Commissioner Martin felt the architecture shouldn't have to tie-in with the hotel and stated that he liked the industrial design. He did feel that city council would be more apt to approve a gas station that would tie-in architecturally with the hotel . It was moved by Commissioner Martin, seconded by Commissioner Drury to continue this case. Carried. 5-0 IN. DISCUSSION ITEMS: 1 . LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR PARKWAY ON .HIGHWAY III BETWEEN LUPINE AND LARKSPUR. Mr. Gregory presented plans and asked for discussion. Commissioner Cook asked why there were no trees in the shopping center parking lot and suggested that some be provided. It was moved by Commissioner Cook, seconded by Commissioner Holden to approve the plans subject to the addition of trees in the eastern Coco's parking lot. Carried 4-0 (Chairman Gregory abstaining) . 2. PIETRO'S Mario DelGuidice, owner, explained that the proposed upper awning for his restaurant was a. recessed awning that would be inside the fascia. Only the valance and 10" of awning will be visible. He also requested that the commission reconsider the signage proposed for the small awnings which would be in 6" letters. Chairman Gregory explained that the commission is trying to be consistent on this item by not allowing signage other than the business identification. It was moved by Commissioner Martin, seconded by Commissioner Cook to approve the upper awning and deny the request for lettering on the small awnings. Carried 5-0 6 --O$fh� off IFal+�'�, 1r)®=(&n0qV 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 October 20, 1986 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION ACTION CASE NO: 317 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) : THOMAS MILLER for Residence Inn, 11753 San Vicente, Los Angeles, CA 90049. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of redesign of a 168 unit residence inn, with restaurant and a gas station. LOCATION: Northeast corner of Highway III and Deep Canyon Road. ZONE: PR-5, N.S.P. and PC (4) S.P. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Upon reviewing the submitted plans and presentations by staff and by the applicant, the architectural commission granted preliminary approval to the original proposed plans subject to conditions. MOBIL STATION Date of Action: October 14, 1986 Vote: Carried 2-I-1 (Commissioner Drury opposed, Commissioner McCrea abstained) (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen ( 15) days of the date of the decision. ) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ STAFF COMMENTS: Please read the attached minutes. 1 MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION OCTOBER 14, 1986 Ms. Sass indicated that a secondary access to Deep Canyon at the north portion of the site will be required. Chairman Gregory stated that he would approve the site plan but would request new elevation drawing and foot prints. It was moved by Commissioner McCrea, seconded by Commissioner Drury to grant preliminary approval of the hotel site plan subject to the following conditions. 1 . New elevations be provided detailing roof pitch. 2. Preliminary landscape plan to be reviewed and approved. 3. Provide a section-through drawing on Deep Canyon and Highway 111 centerline into the property. Carried 4-0 MOBIL STATION Ms. Sass explained the items that had been addressed due to concerns from the commission. Commissioner McCrea felt that a darker tan color stucco on the building would be more appropriate. Mr. Flood, architect, noted they preferred the lighter color but felt that it was open for discussion. Commissioner McCrea made a motion to grant preliminary approval subject to conditions. Chairman Gregory asked if planting could be added around the Mobil Mart. He felt this might mitigate some concerns. Commissioner Martin was still in favor of the industrial type of station and indicated he would vote against the current proposal . He felt that if it was to be village style they should match the architecture of the hotel and be completely village style. i:Mr.--F-I-ood—fe-l-t`they were_ compromising _their design—by-trying to c-provide- changes-city cou6ci-1 might want. --- Commissioner Drury was concerned with the three small structures on the large site. She felt they were out of proportion with the site. 7 I MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION OCTOBER 14, 1986 She was also concerned with the Mobil Mart being located near a restaurant. Mr. Flood explained that they were trying to provide adequate circulation by keeping the structures small . He noted that the restaurant and Mobil Mart had no relation to each other. Commissioner McCrea withdrew his previous motion. Commissioner Martin explained that if the applicant wished to go ahead with the original industrial type of design he would be willing to approve that. It was moved by Commissioner Martin, seconded by Chairman Gregory to grant preliminary approval to the original proposal and site plan subject to the following conditions. 1 . Canopy to have texturized surface. 2. Stucco on buildings to be a muted off-white color. 3. Provide meandering sidewalk around perimeter of site. Carried 2-1- 1 (Commissioner Drury opposed, Commissioner McCrea abstained) . 2. CASE NO: 317 MF APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): HARRY H. SCHMITZ, P.O. Box 3992, Palm Desert, CA 92261 . NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Seven unit senior apartment project. LOCATION: Santa Rosa Way between San Pascual and Portola Avenue. ZONE: R-3 S.O. Ms. Sass explained that the proposal was for a seven unit senior apartment complex. Chairman Gregory felt the site was crowded and suggested deleting one unit to provide additional open space and landscaping. Commissioner Martin noted that one parking space could also be deleted. 8 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 October 20, 1986 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION ACTION CASE NO: 317 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) : THOMAS MILLER for Residence Inn, 11753 San Vicente, Los Angeles, CA 90049. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of redesign of a 168 unit residence inn, with restaurant and a gas station. LOCATION: Northeast corner of Highway Ill and Deep Canyon Road. ZONE: PR-5, N.S.P. and PC (4) S.P. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Upon reviewing the submitted plans and presentations by staff and by the applicant, the architectural commission granted preliminary approval subject to conditions. HOTEL ONLY Date of Action: October 14, 1986 Vote: Carried 4-0 (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen ( 15) days of the date of the decision. ) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ STAFF COMMENTS: Please read the attached minutes. MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION OCTOBER 14, 1986 The applicant suggested that he put only "Alkobar" on the signs and leave out the "liquor". It was moved by Commissioner Drury, seconded by Commissioner Martin to approve the proposed signs with the wording "Alkobar" only in red script lettering. Carried 4-0 B. Preliminary Plans: 1. CASE NO• 317 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) : THOMAS MILLER for Residence Inn, 11753 San Vicente, Los Angeles, CA 90049. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of redesign of a 168 unit residence inn, with restaurant and a gas station. LOCATION: Northeast corner of Highway III and Deep Canyon Road. ZONE: PR-5, N.S.P. and PC (4) S.P. RESIDENCE INN Ms. Sass outlined the changes that had been made to the plans. Commissioner Drury questioned the height requirement for this site. Mr. Diaz indicated that the PC 4 zone was now limited to a 30' height. Ms. Sass noted that the current height is at 32' . Chairman Gregory stated that he was still not satisfied with the architecture. He felt it was a victorian style design which wasn't appropriate for the desert area. Commissioner Martin felt the design had improved and was superior to the surrounding hotel projects. He questioned Chairman Gregory if his concern was with the steep roof. Chairman Gregory indicated that was a large part of his concern. Mr. Littlejohn, architect, explained that some of the units have mezzanines ( lofts) which require the extra height. Chairman Gregory indicated the height wasn't his concern, it was the steep slope of the roof. He noted that with heavy landscaping it could be a nice project. 6 .s MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION OCTOBER 14, 1986 Ms. Sass indicated that a secondary access to Deep Canyon at the north portion of the site will be required. Chairman Gregory stated that he would approve the site plan but would request new elevation drawing and foot prints. It was moved by Commissioner McCrea, seconded by Commissioner Drury to grant preliminary approval of the hotel site plan subject to the following conditions. I . New elevations be provided detailing roof pitch. 2. Preliminary landscape plan to be reviewed and approved. 3. Provide a section-through drawing on Deep Canyon and Highway Ill centerline into the property. Carried 4-0 MOBIL STATION Ms. Sass explained the items that had been addressed due to concerns from the commission. Commissioner McCrea felt that a darker tan color stucco on the building would be more appropriate. Mr. Flood, architect, noted they preferred the lighter color but felt that it was open for discussion. Commissioner McCrea made a motion to grant preliminary approval subject to conditions. Chairman Gregory asked if planting could be added around the Mobil Mart. He felt this might mitigate some concerns. Commissioner Martin was still in favor of the industrial type of station and indicated he would vote against the current proposal . He felt that if It was to be y. Gage sty 1 e they should match the architecture of the hotel and be completely village style. Mr. Flood felt they were compromising their design by trying to provide changes city council might want. Commissioner Drury was concerned with the three small structures on the large site. She felt they were out of proportion with the site. 7 AGENDA ITEM NO. III-8-3 DATE: August 26, 1986 ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION CASE NO: 317 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): THOMAS MILLER, 11753 San Vicente, Los Angeles, CA 90049. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of a 168 unit Home-tel Style Inn, with restaurant and a service station as part of concept. LOCATION: Southeast corner of Highway III and Deep Canyon Road. ZONE: PR-5, N S.P. and P.C. (4) S.P. AGENDA ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION AUGUST 29, 1986 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Final approval of a 7,000 square foot office building. LOCATION: Southwest corner of Alessandro and San Carlos. ZONE: . C-1 B. Preliminary Plans: 1. CASE NO: 315 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) : BREEZE AIR CONDITIONING (JOE COKER) , P.O. Box 0, Palm Desert, CA 92261 . NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of plans for an industrial/warehouse/office building. LOCATION: West side of St. Charles, north of Mediterrean. ZONE: 5. 1 . 2. CASE NO: 316 C APPLICANT (AND, ADDRESS) : GEORGE A. CASWELL, 945 Pebble Beach Drive, Upland, CA 91786. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of plans for a industrial warehouse building. LOCATION: West side of Corporate Way, 403 feet south of Hovley Lane. ZONE: S. I . 3. CASE N0. 317 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) : THOMAS MILLER, 11753 San Vicente, Los Angeles, CA 90049. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of a 168 unit home-tel Style Inn, with restaurant and a service station as bw part of concept. 2 AGENDA -" ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION AUGUST 29, 1986 �yrtMe..b�C LOCATION: Southeast corner of Highway Ill and Deep Canyon Road. ZONE: PR-5, N S.P. and P.C. (4) S.P. 4. CASE NO: 161 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) : FOUNDATION FOR THE RETARDED OF THE DESERT, 73-255 Country Club Drive, Palm Desert, CA 92260; WENDELL VEITH, 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane, Palm Desert, CA 92260. NATURE OF PROJECT APPROVAL SOUGHT: Amendment to a previously approved addition to facility. LOCATION: 73-255 Country Club Drive ZONE: Public Use 5. CASE NO: 302 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY, c/o FRANK WELLS, 4337 Fairlawn Drive, La Canada, CA 91011 . NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Referred for discussion from _ planning commission. LOCATION: Southwest corner of Portola and Highway 111 . ZONE: C-1 IV. DISCUSSION ITEMS: V. ADJOURNMENT /dlg 3 1 f � t � 4 IN 101, B �. 1 1 t � r I 3 its "I'll,� �► �. .� p . w � lip � q-1 _ � , � \ � [ILL a _ ►. r rMe. a �� yiR ��• • -��" r ° • 7a. � ti! i .. 1 '•���I eiioi �'.uae".aeq�i. IIq�y -1 '.� ♦t ..J ym.... {leer ee>a 1[noeaJmawl k u ii:i�i'r: 1. JJ .rn�oati _.,d9v: �rnmor• 1. 7n ner , nr assay! a yy a� �'Y_�ireMr eiiipp ' ��� �' "yI�16\ ��• �: r � Jilin "�i+�eMe�e{[ vJ :. J01 r1Ymi� 111.'. � d1►n� ' _� 1` 1- orii;. ��r �eM.e nr f� 40 0 IF !N, - eree�rL t i go , ^L►i 'tir i 4a t. \ • �Ei 37r K r ee•m� ` � \ • r. . e�iui�(1 i� !;i aim Ji `� • 1 ��_� II v erp�n p �/� um ue.\\ {� iwn red a ammm . -eJr!+i ry'�oJ iia IY� �e:m�iii \ -.�. F.A !-e eee)tpeee[lefeeeee a 7 p4.Jw met nnmwee=J. fIe _. 3�mee[eeele` t� Y V r'_n ima ,II RAM ieew7wee�[\ [-w me wm& 174 �i! '• ; \f�1�/�i ! �,�'•iu I � I, f��+�J`�l� e��``➢"f�.. /" +y� ~R -1 `�,IeaLi e{eo•1 Y !!__I reeJeeeell 11i►{• \ •�// n \ �.',1 s his rur nm{ �'I 1 1 � td�ee•� Vlo. er wii�rJiee• 'w�.�. -'.e� }ww�� a'n'M•i..i i;• _ arl. �,�{ r w• a y een GJm! ' yls.+aw.• .i uy a-.t ill f ' 1 iii�/ � 1 1 r le a�Mr pr ti 'i �aas on �e{Y•rwrS� VM f[r gym ' pyre�1 1 Y W le,�O�e$�arq�►a. s'`;�� .. I 1 ,�-•i�l,�lam' r• v.�,Tr / JI•'m"ea [� ' ' iiur'I lln. V�� • �— I, - F `_ _ � �, �p AYG wee.pr- / y �I\V�ql t- r�!� i"„S i 'i>-_+ `�tar2\� - ^T�'�•-�U Z� ��a� rN apt, �hJ 1 `� 1� wL:a H eYle h y 1 \ 't�= ay'as1�� Yam, lemuolee / •.• C� J � � �--�J��jr r-fy ti') , �' cih�--ram,. G�,•-�'"- ����l�..N- ��',.?�w�:e�:,.�- �- �- ��� � � ��.,,� , � � �z �� L� ©� �_ - _ . 1 } , 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611' October 10, 1986 CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE CASE NO. PP 86-45 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by THOMAS MILLER for RESIDENCE INN to construct a 168 unit inn, a restaurant and a gas station on the north- east corner of Highway 111 and Deep Canyon Road, also described as: APN 625-100-004, 006, 015, 016 021 , 022 _V'ii 'ra ^I III illi 1111111111 -I II l•- �, - SO. S. 0. R-251P P.R.-5, N S.O. R II 2 SO - i IR 2 II I I q-13 - I II I II I ft-I ft l- �_ R •_ R-I r - a, 16,00 K,0 SP R-I . R• w R I R I R v1,. R:� R I, la O^C 3 000 13 00 13 klq.RS,N. SR R3141 EC.(4) N_C-I• S.P. z • S.P. ' C-1.SR C-I, SP. C I,SP.T C S.P -III'' F-3 (41 SPA PG141S.P _ _ C I S.P. p-3 pp R-3 PR-6 C-I,dP 1C-I zemC I ..-'_C 1 P C-1 'll R3 R3 IOP 11-]]1 ,la]21 R 3141 •'''R-3 20,000 (J) L 1 P 1r•3131 0' R- JI R3 (3)_131 R-] 131 O R-I 0'000 ✓•� 13.,.0 000 13 • .,.. R-a3' 13z o0o0. 0 l31 R 1 0 b R 1�0000 PR 4 SCUP01 ]4 ••• PD) R 120,000 R-I I6,000 R 0000 - PL.1 �I O R-I 20,000- R120,000 _` - - • R ITV ] R,I R-IIC CC6 :=-I 11 ' -_-R-I-20,000' R 120000 SPA - w. •• "` R I IO CJO-- - R R R ll R I R-3 f41 -90 ®, ✓ 0.5 '.0000' 0'S' awl V IN01AN WELLS CITY LIMIT C O.S. O.S. SAID public hearing will be held on Tuesday, November 4, 1986 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber at the Palm Desert City Hall , 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. If you challenge the proposed actions in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you nor someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the city council (or planning commission) at, or prior to, the public hearing. ` PUBLISH: Desert Post RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary October 24 , 1986 Palm Desert Planning Commission LAW OFFICES OF KECK, MAHIN & CATE A PARTNERSHIP(NCLUOINC PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS 8300 SEARS TOWER GABLE ADDRESS 233 SOUTH WACKER DRIVE WASHINGTON OFFICE: "HAMSCOTT- 1730 PENNSYIVANIA AVENUE,N.W. CHICAGO,ILLINOIS 60606-6589 SUITE 350 TELEX WASHINGTON,D C.20006A706 25-3411 (312)876-3400 (202)347-7006 PEORIA OFFICE: TELECOPIER (312)876-3582 PEORIA SAVINGS PLAZA SURE 640 PEORIA, 802-8866 (309)09)673-161fi81 FILE NUMBER 285/702/020 OAK BROOK OFFICE: DIRECTOIAL 876-3503 OAK BROOK SUITE850Y TOWERS 1415 WEST 22ND STREET OAK BROOK,ILLINOIS 60521-2008 August 15, 1986 (312)954-2100 Department of Planning and Community Development City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, California 92260 Attention: Mr. Raymond Diaz Re: App t.�l� ion for Brown/Miller Development a Northwest' corner of Highway 111 and De —Cayon: Assessor's Parcels No. 625-100-015, 016 & 021 Gentlemen: Leslie Fund, Inc. has signed the above application and authorized the applicant to file the same with you. This is done subject to the understanding that if for any reason a sale of the Leslie Fund property to the Brown/Miller group is not concluded by August 31, 1987 the Leslie Fund would then have the option to cancel the proposed Subdivision and all restrictions, conditions, easements, requirements, etc. attaching to the Subdivision insofar as they relate to the Leslie Fund property, i.e. , restore that property to its present status. Also, we have not yet seen the formal drawings which are being submitted by Brown/Miller, but assume the proposed Subdivision and project will be substantially as shown in the preliminary drawings discussed at your meeting with the developers and Bob Hubbard on August 6, 1986. A ;Wvyy%'ig l , C. RWW:pag cc: Mr. C. Robert Hubbard Mr. James D. Brown Mr. Thomas R. Miller Sounded Y886 &Lgwtiny Out &ntmnial TEaT / t 73-510 Fred Waring Dr., Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 yu5e if[A�j 8h TEN74 PARCEL A? ,UPLBCA79CH FORA : Dept.of Planning and Community Development BROWN/I=TILLER DEVELOPMENT c/o Sonc-,cST-e_ �eti` �� _aol7?O Applicant (please print) _ 11753 San Vincente Blvd. l�� $CO 'UQeP Cp.r'(C' 213 820 7063 Mailing Andress Telepnone Los Angeles , CA 90049 P"�' City State Zip-Code i REQUEST! (Describe specific nature of approval requested). Subdivide ten (10) acres into three parcels for develooment of a hotel, restaurant and service station. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Northwest corner of Hwy 111 and Deep Canyon, West of Embassy suite and south of Hidden Palms . ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 625-100-015, 625-100.-016 and 625-100-021 (PC4-SP) EXISTING ZONING � Property Owner Authorization The undersigned states the they are the owner(s) of the property described herein and hereby give author- SUBJECT TO plicatl n ATTACHED LETTER 8/15/86 signature Date Agreement absolving tM Gty of Im Dssert of all liatimnes relative to any dead restrictions. I DO 6Y MY SIGNATURE ON THIS AGREEMENT, �Ab�solvve1l Me City of Palm Desert of all liabilities regarding any deed restrictions _ apW� ,N fo the Property described herein. ee//%T/)� MCl/� 8/15/86 THE LESLIE FUND 7 Signature Date Applicants Signature Signature Date (FOR STAFF USE ONLY) Environmental Status Accepted by: ❑ Ministerial Act E.A.No. ❑ Categorical Exemption - CASE MO,Negative Declaration M ElOther - Reference Case No. QM11O ."M 9GY4p ♦Te •-11-es �— CM VF PALS 6 Do EUR PORN mc. 73-510 Fred Waring Dr., Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 TENT. PARCE I SAP .-:rFUCAMCH IP'C(RN : Dept.of Planning and Community Development LRlS 31l•G THOMAS MILLER Applicant (please print) 11753 SAN VICENTE (213) 820-7063 Mauing Address Taieonons LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90049 City Slate Zip-Coos REQUEST: (Describe specific nature or uWrnval requastod APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP ON 10± ACRES AT THE NE CORNER HIGHWAY '111 AND DEEP CANYON CONTAING A PROPOSED HOTEL, RESTAURANT AND SERVICE STATION PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: 08 ACRE RELATIVELY FLAT SLOPING TO THE NORTH ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO, 625-100-004 EXISTING ZONING PC - (4) S.P. Property Owner Authanzatlon The undersigned states that trey are me owner lsi of the property dascnGw harem or;- hcreb; ization for the filing of this application. . y-Jose h M Buccino - Sionarurs Anita Buccino Darey Agr snt absolving the City of fPolm Desert of all liabilities relative to any deep restrictions. 1 DO BY MY SIGNATURE ON THIS AGREEMENT, Absolve the City of Palm Desert of all liabilities regarding any deed restrictions Mat may be apaiicobls to the property described herein. j ph M. Buccino Signature Anita Buccino Dole/ Applicant's Signature Signature Date (FOR STAFF USE ONLY) Environmental Status Accepted by: a ❑ Ministerial Act E.A. No. ❑ Categorical Exemption (�/el . ❑ Negative Declaration CA�� Han ❑ Omer Reference Case No. nm�.ratst sewwi�n s.ras LK DEBEG'c7p FORM 73-510 Fred Waring Dr., Palm Desert, Ca. g8__w0 T�� f� � 1 aPPU(CAMCH FCRH : Dept.of Planning and Community Development THnMAS MILLER Appncant (please print) 11753 SAN VICFNTF (213) 820-7063 Mailing Actlrasa _ LOS ANGELES CALIFORNIA 90049 Ci ty State. Zip-Coca REQUEST! (Describe specific nature of approval requested I. APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP ON 10± ACRES AT THE NE CORNER HIGHWAY 111 AND DEEP CANYON CONTAINING A PROPOSED HOTEL, RESTAURANT AND SERVICE STATION PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: .80 ACRE RELATIVELY FLAT SLOPING TO THE NORTH ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 625-100-022 EXISTING ZONING _ PC—(4) S.P. Property Owner Authorizatlon TIw uridersignod states that they are the owner(s) of the property described herein chat hereby give author izatloh for the filing of this opolicatlon Ri chard L. Kuxhaus & Phyllis S. Kuxhaus - 3 PHYLLIS S. Signature / Date Agreement absolving the Gty, of Palm Desert of all liabilities relative to any coed restrictions. I DO Sy MY SIGNATURE ON THIS AGREEMENT, Absolve the City of Palm Desert of all Ito billtles regarding any deed restrictions that may be applicable) to the property described herein. PHYI I IS S. KUXHAUS Signature DORIS MAY i t Date - J Applicants Signature Signature Date (FOR STAFF USE ONLY) Environmental Status Accepted by: ❑ Ministerial Act E.A. No. CASE ❑ Categorical Exemption CAS MME Il�l�a ❑ Negative Declaration ❑ Other Reference Case No. rXnwLw„CMT1l M"PCES/ATe 11r-ri TY OF FA6 LH DENS G 73-510 F-ad Waring Dr., Palm Desert. Ca. 9«60 � I 7EE NT RARCE I MAP .appL3(Ca1�'li(CH FCRE& : Dept.of Planning and Community Development� THt7MAS M I I I ER - --- Applicant (pease print) 11753 SAN VICENTE (213) 820-7063 Mailing Aatlrass Telephone LOS ANGELES CALIFORNIA 90049 State Zip-Coca Ci ty REQUEST! I Descrtbe specific nature of approval requested). APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP ON 10± ACRES AT THE NE CORNER � I HIGHWAY Ill AND DEEP CANYON CONTAINING A PROPOSED HOTEL, RESTAURANT AND SERVICE STATION PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:. /.8E RELATIVELY FIL SLOPING TO THE NORTH ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 625-100-022 EXISTING ZONING PC-M S.P. - Property owner Authorization The undersigned states that they are the owner Is) of the property described herein and hereby give author• 1ptlon for the Ilin of this 000)ication. Richard L. Kuxhaus & Phyllis S. Kuxhaus Revocable Trust JfA i Date PHYL Si nature Agreement absolving ina Gry of Polm Dasart of all liaollinas relative to any deed resttictlons. _ 1 00 8y MY SIGNATURE ON THIS AGREEMENT, Absolve the City of Palm Desert of all I)dbilittes regarding any deed restrictions �----_l that may be applicable M the Property described herein. Signature DORIS MAY Date Trustee + Applicants Signature P` Signature Date (FOR STAFF USE ONLY) Environmentol Status Accepted by: ❑ Ministerial Act E.A. No.❑ Categorical Exemption CASE Rn— ❑ Negative Declaration . ❑ Other - Reference Case No. prrn�u ummi Ara e.r-ex RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT PROPERTY OWNERS CERTIFICATION I ROY DAVIS certify that on riot name 8-14-u the attached property owners list was (month-day-year) prepared by TICOR TITLE INSURANCE pursuant to application print company or in ivy ua s name requirements furnished by the Riverside County Planning Department. Said list is a complete and .true compilation of owner of the subject property and all other property owners within 300 feet of the property involved in the application and is based upon the latest equalized assessment rolls. I further certify that the information filed is true and correct to the best of my knowledge; I understand that incorrect or erroneous information may be grounds for rejection or denial of the application. NAME: ROY L. DAVIS TITLE/ REGISTRATION : TICOR TITLE INSURANCE ADDRESS : 3490 TENTH STREET RIVERSIDE, CA 92501 PHONE: (8 - 5) (714)686-418o SIGNATURE: DATE: CASE PD 83-55 625 - 10- r C. A. o18- ool S 2 NE 4 S,I 018- 029 018- 006 016 - 017 co (1 T 99r A -F3/.66 In t . I � 'o Y. ". 200, 07 I 42 �ry �3i.se I FRA 1806 ! TR /80/ VA 7f OLD N0. I NEW NO. 2/l61 3 1 /J /6 2/76 1 /0 2/75 1 /z l9,z0 `l 4.9/ SAC .7ras 7 1z7,zs 3ne 3 v I � /oo-,! 2! 09 I ;0 24 2J,P5!/ I ,1 1 ZJ,4J P6 l0-!l q 379• P 3P90-4 / T R A 1829 !/ 1J9 - - C 262Q .w �- _ 4 Q3.. a-e4z6;z9 30 .601Ac 3.37i4c �A 263fAc 2 65 r 9/85 ze.30 31 - o eoA r � h •. -� 1. _ _ _ _ —__ _ — _ _ I I _ � __ -- _ - - � 1 I I i A rA R HWY MAP V///-R/V- 187—C GLO PL A r PIS 7160 52173 ] 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 October 10,' 1986 CITY OF PALM DESERT .,. 3 LEGAL NOTICE CASE NO. PP 66-45 NOTICE 15 HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by THOMAS MILLER for RESIDENCE INN to construct a 168 unit inn, a restaurant and a gas station on the north- east corner of Highway III and Deep Canyon Road, also described as: APN 625-100-004, 006, 015, 016 021 , 022 III 1. .1 .._.I ',� ,•, —II - V I I I III I I III II I I IR-11 I I I I j I I I I I i I I I I P.R.-5• N -2 S. 11 ION 1 R-1 -- f ml- I6,00 WA R-i.• .qa R 44.. ry ] i R I 4me R 1 3 000 R3a100' 13 RCS<h.. s n s R-I R314) a s(41 PC.141,N s> C-I• S.F. so ii:;!�!p;;�i3: S.P. C-I,S.fl S.P R014)$.P �T: ^GK�S.? -�•E-1, 9P. • . F-3 141 .0 I,S.P. R-3 C P C - 1 �- R R 3 RR-4 C : C_I. .P C-1 7•- I R-3 3 O.P n-TT) ,w]y R 3W1 { Pfl 6 31 R-3(4) R-3 20,000(3) C P R-3131 0' R R3 (31 R-31(3) O - _ .R 3 -3 3 R-I b,000 a� _ R-3 13 000 13) r R-3 13,000 (3) R-I 12,000 R-1 p 000 .. R-120,000- R-I 16,000 aCPP03 T3 R1 �1 R1 R1 VCUP-01-94 PD)s - .PLI ..L . .•, R-1 20,000 R 120,000 R R I L o.• 1 R-I ---N-1 26,000 - R L20000 SP Y R-1 IOCOO Rll R I R I R11 R)I '� .. a Poml. . R-3141 ®:® R-1 30,000 . I✓ O.S. ro"'o s� R 1.30.000 F-I ( 0 S. �e`yy v: F I1 'D QQQ - e' dr NOICN WELLS CITY LIMIT D O.S. SAID public hearing will be held on Tuesday, November 4, 1986 at 7:00 p.m, in the Council Chamber at the Palm Desert City Hall , 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. If you challenge the proposed actions in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described In this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the city council (or planning commission) at, or prior to, the public hearing. PUBLISH: Desert Post RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary October 24 , 1986 Palm Desert Planning Commission 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 October 10, 1986 CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE CASE NO. PP 86-45 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by THOMAS MILLER for RESIDENCE INN to construct a 168 unit inn, a restaurant and a gas station on the north- east corner of Highway 111 and Deep Canyon Road, also described as: APN 625-100-004, 006, 015, 016 021 , 022 w I Ik-II 17�P. III o r 1 �'� •. I I I . II71771HIM 11IR 0. J S.O. R-2 — - vi •4, .. S.D. RS2p:P P.R.-6, N 2 S.0 A IR12 71 11 rLl IE,001 WAI 5P _R-I ..._. .R-I 15 _ ys i I I x p= . R-1 Ia0nO 3,000 13 A �OIfl3 R3141I �R1'JR%I P Ramn.Rl '-m-IpjnDe. ve,• YC�4j f.. FG141,N- "OII C-I,S.P. .�L � <-�� C In S.F 'w ,%::::ii :::!:: S.P. ' M 9 Q a7 Md £ Y r L-I,SA I^ -r L I,SPp .L I S.P C-4, S.R C-,-9P^• L C I,S.P FR 3141 q 3 PC(4)5.F 1 T _ q P 1DP.II 771' UR-3 L I L-I- P C 'ill R3 - OPPiI-'!7) t. 16 R-314) PR-6 r L1 p. � _ -.71701 3 01(3) P tr3131 - •p 3-w721 R-I IO,000 . I I I _ R 3 13 000 (31 • - F3 13,000 131R •"V •o••• R 12 000 oo° P R 1 R-I R 10 000 _ p -p/ PR 4 R IR 12� R IP I I/�i p/LP� 7 �: R-I R I -- A 10 000 - 01 76 PD)2LUP P0373 RI _ R 20,000 fl-120,000 (�__-FV-I-20,000. - 20'00 • . Sp `Yq o n... , RI I R ® R C C00 Rll PSIee Ro�3 R.l lF 1 R 314) ^ III O— 9 - J O.S. - -°`n •� R I-3 p ix01<N WELLS CITY IImR 8 SAID public hearing will be held on Tuesday, November 4, 1986 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber at the Palm Desert City Hall , 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert. California, at which time and place all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. If you challenge the proposed actions in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the city council (or planning commission) at, or prior to, the public hearing. PUBLISH: Desert Post RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary October 24 , 1986 Palm Desert Planning Commission I . I ONL'ImlTb-q PG 66D , , i li V(L 17,50-t' 2S " . - i I � PINERIDGE, LTD. A 314 11753 SAN VICENTE BLVD. 213-820-7063 6 a� LOS ANGELES, CA 90049 8_ / 3 O 9 0-1 2 61102 1222 '793°° ��'✓VV�' �<-..i /I c.,,r,�o�C..eQ �t/.-rc.e.l�.. �ice �r�r, OSanta Monica Bank FWRM STREET AND ARIZONA AVENUE n!Sanca Monica, Calif..J9,0401 - I: L222L26iPi1:0 A, . b3i 47Lill i , I I ' I i j 66 � SB J O 4 7 q,3 e� —a/}Np�TUDCp PING! PRINTS ISSUED � MISTWO snLDDo Pw&E—� 662.25' DAU Pun.Da "----- MLR To NRMNTN PAUU Jt.U/ FO[ CITY RCv,Lu ca ■A N NOT ^" I I !is I I I I lL; I i ! I ! I SAT.DUN 14 12 2XUnN0 M L t arApY SUM ' ,.- R UCTION I; I ECIIEEM WALL! � �-- FOR CONSTR — .AZE.O % � reNsou 1 �---� r---- � REVISIONS RITE MLM Na i o I I �� I III Hurl R _ aTrss 1 TENUE Taws �_ �Na°su"� I� -� --- — PROJECT DATA: ---1 I c"ALLEN�COUNT - i THE RESIDENCE INN: 21 BUILDINGS o TOTAL SUITES: 168 (8 SUITES PER BLDG.) r- - A ��" oA I wasstt.oAND '' ! o PARKING: 178 -- - _� ACRES: 7.804 30.0 Pool 1 POOL — { RESTAURANT SITE: PARKING: 96 j —J^! �____ DAVID L. HOFFMAN, A.I.A. J i __� ✓ / ACRES: 1.586 •.cMlT.cT f _� � i' TTAt1� � � MT1N011EE/LLRETRM .. .. ---�—�_ .•.----r/ rb...n.aaw+fw c...•wiC aee M--U,71ElM � _ i TOTAL ACRES: 9.39 I� TRASH V s i�orA4T nNa-Awls s ouu�lt �� _ . lNCI.O�IRIt ( MlII TO NRiTAURANT-CLw —MrnsRN•o Door PATTOUN®CON&. A NENED COIR• �M M gs sUl"WN cNamm RELATED DRNEINfiS O "'� 1 I ¢ ! - z � STUXTM O �� i MACTouu � �I ttNY10E ETATI0U1 1 ---� iv"N'a"'N"m . 1� % I „� • �— -- --- OIUTM Mu.ErAwT WETS a f11ERS !, ►ATTEMNED CON&. W ( —; ILI �l E 11s ! . AONCT TAN M - -- — —_ - _ _ T"'" PALM DESERT CALIFORNIAI PATTWMM COMG KEY PLAN I HIGHWAY Ill I PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN sNnT TRUs smw LAIL"ALE OF smnn --- EXISTING STUCCO►ENCII - PRINTS ISSUED z I[XWTMG STUCOO n - 62.9y OATI rSRrOIN semi Lc. — RLvL� i + ►� �.iRAL T WA Le PALM DESERT RESIDENCE INN POTENTIAL PLANT LIST 1 BOTANICAL NAME Com"M NAME SIZE CONDITION Aims rhombifolia White Alder 24 in. _ Box llz � Erythrina caffra Coral Tree 24 in. Box�� •• 1 n -� Magn olia grandiflora Southern Magnolia 30 in. Box 14 13 it / Nelaleuca lauudendra Gjaput Tzee 15 Qa1. Cont. Schinus cerebinthifo llus Brat ill n Pa Dpaztzee 24 in. Box Quezcus ilex tlolly oak 24 in. Box i��� -- -•i ../ --- Pyrua ca11 ryana 'Bradford' Bradford Bear 24 in. Box _ 12 - -. - EXISTING WALL B EMBASSY SUITE Prunus ceraslfera 'Attu' Purple Leaf Plum 15 gal. Cont. rOps lis an 24 in. Box Chamaeg onia`filifara Mediterranean a Fan rPalm 24 in. box Washin t 1 — A '.• E�BO Arscastrum ana s dioidea Palm 24 in u _ I i ESN WALL + ! Phoenix robenic pygmy Data Palm 30 in. Box - .- Cu niopsi anae rdioid Car otwood 2� n Box e I Ea +t� `I r �LA ��/ �..a ! Podocarpussmacrophillusas yew 15 gal. Cont. n F0�C��'STRUCTIOt�� �., Caesalphlnia gilliasii Yellow Bird of 5 gal. Cont. REVnsla+s Paraise • 1 ';` ---� CAliistemon phoenicalus Bottlebrush 5 gal. Cont. MR ITEM 1� [taDniolapi■ Indic& Indian Hawthorne 5 gal. Conc. M._ ••• i —' - - - - Nerium oleander Oleander 5 gal. Cont. ---- - _- _ �, _--- Pittosporum tobira 'Var.' Wheelers Dwarf 5 gal. Cont. V •. � S I t �� . . Nockozange nz E --- _ - Nandins domestic& Heavenly Bamboo 5 gal. Cont. 'j Arbutus unedc Strawberry Tree 15 gal. Cont. Ababa grandiflora 'Sherwood' Sherwood Abelia 5 gal. Conc Bougainvillea spectabilis Bougainville& 5 gal. Cont.* ' 16 ��_ �..��,� - ••"---�--^• j CArias& grandiflora Natal Plum 5 gal. Cont. I --- _ Escallonia ftadesi Pradee Escallonia 5 qal. Cont. OPs tinatus ' { - �''1 .___-_- _ �.. !•- - .-_._ _. ..------ /J GHib scnaus&cu k1 Golden il eShrub Dairy 15gal. Cant' ' Pearl' Grev 1 a 5 Cont ' o nansis Chinese Hibiscus 1 Cont. . 'Bonte idensi■ Weeping lantana 1 gal. Cont. rr TEN/BS TRNM$ TENNIS TENNIS TENNIS IIEEN w - - - I africianus Lily of the 1 gal. Cont. `------ ------- ' Agapanthus DWf.. L 1 a BU1 NO Nile . OIALLENOE C067RT �y Hedra helix 'Kahn's' Hahn'■ Ivy Flats __�_ Llriope splcata Lirlope 1 gal. Cont. 17 TrachelosDermum asiaticum Asiatic Jasmine 1 gal. Cont. AAWnrigus dens lorus D 5 rVerbena peruviana enga Fern 1�gal. Cont.• �4 if 'S z p ri I igens Gazanla Flats '• c��� -1•i OF Annuals &"pots. S" ctra. 4/27 i Turf Common Bermuda Sod F (Over seed with Annual in Winter. i 1R 7 a Aye � 30.0 / ♦OOL ?' t SCRIERN WALL., G==U1L IRRIGATION Nam: I- - 1.) Tho irrigation ws ste shall be • permanent and (2 � areas ground cover/shrub beds hall bef irrigated or,2.I Turf ar and T�, ; --- -- _------ -- ti` - separate irrigation zones to provide watering of materials on ACT a Similar need basis. Irrigation techniques shall be oriented toward rater conservancy as much as possible. - -',,—, Ll( TO RESTAURANT-CLUB 10 Y - -rATTURENED CONIC. _ -- - - r RRI COMC. Yew — rATTEAE MW COMA. ASH UR ORAWM 1 I' _ In �. r _ _ _ — r RELATED DR M*4" �_ ' BE>&Itf r _ — t mwcnRl W - \ I sflbWBCad t1CTRIM -_. .J RESTAURANT —_ —_.•_ -. anon Z 2 SERVICE STATIO11 IN _ seaulma►Awlafs OF EiWETf a rATTMI! - '? _� — EXNM*G WALL a EMBASSY SUITEUj L, Uj 3D 60 90 ► EaleeN WALL I NUMBER WA rATTE RNED DOMG - KEY PLAN IE a D IM • SII[R TRIt z H- SNINILANDSCAPE CONCEPT PLAN a alma ', PRINTS ISSUED DATE Pump S[ NO. EFORCONSTRUCTION REVISIONS J DATE iT[M NO. Z1 a Ei - 1 ` i Mobil 1 s- INE SIGHT L HIGHW 1„ DECEL LANE BERM -- _ - SIDEWALK SCREEN WALL SCREEN WALL BERM BERM 36'-0' 64'-0' 26'-0' PARKING DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY CROSS SECTION @ SOUTH PROPERTY LINE AND HIGHWAY 111 EDAVIDL. HNITICT , A.I.A. AlCMITlCTM WCtTA,RA/ME1 •7!W DRAMM CHKK[D } KEY 1 c -- 1 O Y EL O 0 2 ZO e _ PROJECT NUM![! 7626 J Z ; W v �- �,{� �.. � PALM DESERT, CALIF- = W 1 SIDEWALK JOGGING TRACK SIDEWALK a 4'-6' SCREEN WALL s - N s T `� KEY PLAN • �.� , 2'-0'-�3'-0' 46'-0' 27'-0- 22'-0' 20'-0' 16'-0' CROSS SECTIONS SHEET TITLE DEEP CANYON ROAD BERM DRIVEWAY PARKING SHEET NUMEIE7< CROSS SECTION @ WEST PROPERTY LINE AND DEEP CANYON ROAD Of-SHIFTS PRINn ISSUIED DAN NCL y � R•Et/1[kt RrASIONS am rnm_ um ia+ FOR RGviW �- J r~ y T p r i .j. on-nm -A a mmm frKN{ SECTION A A-f , 71 i DAYID L. NOFfYAN, A.I.A. er ! - e� ni+,'�''r _�_` _ -. .�z ., .P - i - - -4 .= _ :., i __ `� - n...�a.• wosar a«ww�+Q sae 71 T .i �{I A ' 1 1 SECTION B GRAN" c"KX. {Fv R[uTED ORAMNSGi sNNa esoNs srmxym rNourcu UJIMMAL onm ssoubm►.rssn a sNsrrs , � _ -per - �•� � - �� � - .. ��-,'�' _ � . _� r, - � �� i woncr rsNSRR 7 • sty _ ``� _— ,`.., ,.�� -r - t�Y �J '� PALM DESERT CALIF. SECTION C MTMO 1 CT01 C H"Wr MEN OMncM VC OMVCT,r■M.OUM CONCEIT ICEr nAH �-- •--, 1 -1 iL�Dj E :e •o L1 SCALE r-RV-e' SITE CROSS SECTION men R E NNE O/ smm S 4'i ' ` h`.1" '.� F -f, '�� �t � _ 7 —7- ———----- �1.e.� kL lt�.11��! F_ �y�__• l� i •c"�l �ti���>`�yr��� `-_ , ri r�,� t l _" 'T�, :. r..s,+/�'"lam►, cl(A�'s++.►=�tt-�,y� � -� r. - tom`A•.S`". v e.ey �'�f r-1 r-1 ti t INN- 64 ,�� f 4 i{ � .{ a DIM Ott Fr Oo DD �E Ti PED V ti I -� / 1 �► tj :.. � 'I f tr•, i i /K i , !v� i E 1 v 1 �•F .• v a Erg � �� • I. I i i f ik 1 t II j t � J V Y • ' it IL 17 ID n {� • VA + 7-1 �---J LF Li , T7 0 L(�) � � DD PRINTS ISSUED DATE NO. 1 III i -- FOR CONSTRUCTION: REVISIONS DATE REM ND. SERMING o' II _; ELEVATION Oi J >� I _1 z 401 V 0 --- IL SCREEN WALL WITH STUCCO FINISH W < W 20 O W J . o� _ -- t' EDAVID V, L. HOFFMA N. A.I.A. _ "oCNIT6CT SERMING ."Comm�N�� aTo6 �i **o-**so cevo r®}6 16 SECTIO �I 1 SIDEWALK-J000 NG TRACK 40 s � / i t SERMING 1 Z C z 4 �� s1 OR c�ac6o 1 < C IL SCREEN WALL WITH STUCCO FINISH a C PLAN O' 0 20 00 �' '� - V MINI p� %r POowcr H M M 7 6 2 6 W' / _ _ SERMING I in! L— - QIl SIDEWALK PALM DESERT CALIF. �❑ per' SIDEWALK-JOOGING TRACK i_y awlKEY PLAN h'�_ I - j - I 42'-0• 20'-0' i3'-0" j 27'-0• 46'-0• II CROSS SECTION PROPERTY LINE AND DEEP CANYON ROAD PLAN AND ELEVATION CROSS SECTION Cb FINEST PROP �""' TIT" ENEET NEMl66t 0 2 10 114.7-101• or 6NEEn s • II I WALK TO HIDDEN PALMS ' � -- EXISTING STUCCO FENCE - 662.95 - ---- - EXISTING STUCCO FENCE - - - PRINTS ISSUED OAT[ PURPOSE NO. I I/14/ FOR C l-F-r R EV I E W 46' PUTTING GREEN I CE RA H T 13 13 13 18 } WA A ill IH SAT. Olt" 1 l -+ fi- 7 6 r, I _ - - 0 - T — --- - ---- 1 - EXISTING WALL @EMBASSY BUTTE � i � 9 j-t GAZEBO t SCREEN WALL , GAZEBO -- - PERGOLA ,) ( I 15 I FOR CONSTRICTION ao ; REVISIONS ch 12 DATE ITEM NO. 1 i 16 1 16 o � - i I O I I TRASH ENCLOSU a �FJMAM& TENNIS TENNt$ TENNIS TENNIS J , SCREEN WALL - _ PUMP . � n CHALLENGE COURT L' I BUILDING PROJECT D A 'A i 17 O `17 f n — THE RESIDENCE INN.. 21 PUIL,DINCS 77 \ ` L SUITES: 168 (8 SUITES P - SPA i TOTAL PER BLD ui G. FASCHUFFLEBOARD Os PARKING. 17 8 i � I 30.0' _ .ACRES: 7.8 04 - POOL ----- - • � �, POOL I i ;, 1 18 � , _ 0 RESTAURANT SITE. 1 1 4 ----- PARKING: 96 4. ACRES: 1.586 DAVID L HOFRMAN, A.t.A.SCREEN WALL GATEHOUSE/MEETING L,' ; _-! 1 — ' ARCHITECT sss mow,wcNEA,KAwsA� RSRN►1 i TOTAL ACRES: 9.39'24 . • 1 1 I 8 O PA T E----FLAG POLE t 1 TRASH ' SCULPTURE- ARTS SCULPTURE ARTS A CULTU � II ENCLOSURE <'- - 3 WALK TO RESTAURANT-CLUB f, 3 10 --- PATTERENED CONC. � - 10 J p J PATTERENED CONC. — loan PATTERENED CONC. TRASH ENCLOSURE OSU — — - 13 ___ ____- DRAWN CHECKED ch i rF- C, SERVICE RELATED DRAWINGS i 11- SHELL z ( I j � DETAILS O W I -- [� STRUCTURE MECHANICAL SERVICE STATION I RESTAURANT — ELECTRICAL N OTHER I SEQUENCE NUMBER a PATTERENED CONC. - SHEETS W - -- — EXISTING WALL EMBASSY SUITE OF • k � 11 11 11 W -- - I I I I 15 SCREEN I -� �• 6 �,, EN WALL ." UNT N ILI 9 I PROJECT Numult 7626 4_ I SCRIIEN WALL - FOUNTAIN __ _ PALM DESERT — —. —s 632.48' �r - - CALIFORNIA - -- - PATTERENED CONC. -- KEY PLAN HIGHWAY 111 = =- 1"=30'-0" - _ PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN SHEET TITLE TT rF SHEET NUMBER OF SHEETS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r y d } R F21 NTS 1 1CAME j; jr�e t f'irr t,, , '1 I 1•� � M'� 1 I�F i✓I *"`]r. lolls, FAR REv►E ` »'�`� s, WwAW TO 001111MV ' p • wray; - i .�, �= ........._.—.___.•^-- . _ ---_.. ' CF -CENTRAL HOT WATER BUN.DbNt3 i l� "l W pb! E " TRASH ENCL.CE)RE i 1 Tau" ENCtOU# IQ 41, V477 f737- EL " ;r O _- ;��� RE IONS , r _ v LA WE � � ITEM , �f Y \(\ \\ V • \ r _ t , — SCTK3ir1 Ct r rr , ' �j�p 6 SBC'Plp C { i I + i 1 I I 3»», • III i I I I 1 I " I , TENNIS ' " i NN�s r� o \41 I ' • , 4 I lJ i Puma GMEN f 14(9 i M1 _ I 1 i, , t./ p x , , r 4, �t iµ " .: �} ,. � ,i i,. N� �� _""� i1.., J „� -`.- :/'"/ ''.r—..,,,w i -_._._.:.—._ _ ,,. ..- .. '.y `y' ,�,�r'�ii1A•� r 41 1 n, I µ 1p _. t �Ry� • 188TOTA @ a� , .. L SWIM B - r . DRAMN rm —A l� r K� 31 t 2� ,. ,J �� t �✓ �1 if': I i i I V ( } Ilft {{} r t/'"`'' - g' .. ._ .q ��yr t■r�1� wit 'fib/. T PAR sum J ITT- y , SnRtiCTURE RKTAKft 4.1 of i , i " 4 --- - ! � r as . , y { , SERVICE STATION I I ,� t ESTAUF4AOT 1 — - , s y - y — - - --- NJMN tCT ! PALM! DE CL + _ RT, _CM *, LU r Ltd ! ri — - -- I _ KEY PLAN �- RE P L Y_ SITE P# { HAY - -- ��� SHEET TITLE MEET A1Ht 41110* M Erm c kit 1=380-00 CIF - F . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PRINTS ISSUED DATE PURPOSE NO. JOGGING I i ■ K _ SAND VOLLEYBALL , { 1 1■ I PUTTING GREEN - -- ■ I T------� -r_ _.,.---------------r____ _. -------r-----T --T-- , -- -- - --- r _ TRAS4 _ ENCLOSUOE ■ ■ � 1 - 1 TRASH ENCL06l�RE ■ I ■ ( 1 1 He He ; ----1 --- ; I I � ■ f I � _ 13 11 , __ � tig r FOR CONSTRUCTION: L II --- ■� - - REVISIONS LL, - 8 - 14 12 - - -� j 1 - -- �_ 1 DATE ITEM NO. 1 r 1 I ` ■ �' -' 0AZ EoM-- ��1�� _ _ - - _ - _ . ^-L — -- �(iAZEeO�'. " • ■ I _._�.._---� -.., -.. � �.'�--- --- -- I PERGOLA � t •� l 1 , r 15 I ! f 1 i � I 1 � I i TENNIS � TENNIS TENNIS TENNIS TENNIS TENNIS 1 � I L I � ■ _ 6 � _ I j HC L 1 ■ I ! I HC 1 ! � I I � 1 j ----� _ ; + J t ■ r (17) - -- 1 ■ _ - �- ■ 7 1 -- L___ (�SPA SHUFFLEBOARD -_J � 'i /� ■ DAVID L.. NOFFMAN. A I A ANGNITRCT 1��_���_ _. —mil ■ i - 1 1�__ FDA WOWA,KNO" 47"s POOLe� 20"as caste Baas POOL ■ : 8114 1 j J 1 � 1 _ / THE RESIDENCE INN 1 1 I GATEHOUSE/MEETING FACILITIE �., -- - -- 21 BUILDINGS WITH 8 SUITES PER BUILDING 168 SUITES 20) 21 -- i -- ; PARKING --' THE RESIDENCE INN 172 f ; RESTAURANT 100 i MIM A c LTu RE u LP ` 1 9.3 ACRES � ACREAGE 9 C ES DRAWN CHECKED - - - - 1 HC He - cr. RELATED DRAWINGS ■ \ 1 ■ I� i SHELL Z 1 o i 1 DETAILS T-�� O _ - , ! ■ STRUCTURE 1 • MECHANICAL Z ELECTRICAL 1 j 1 0 s t0 ZO SO �� OTHER SEQUENCE NUMBER + 1 I / 1 _ _ - _ ■ OF SHEETS uj I RESTAURANT y f 1 LINN � RESIDENCE - _ - 1 _ � ■ SE R V E STATION ! __ _ i ' _ 1 PROJECT NUMBER ■ 7626 f 1 PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 1 i KEY PLAN \ ■mri•■�■ " ■WON■SEE■SEE■0001■0001■mi7Lia�■son■now■now■ ■ ■.Is+fist`■�a m■�■�■�■�■�■1�-at ti�a�■�■�■ ■�ysi�a�+� PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN HIGHWAY 111 SHEET TITLE SHEET NUMBER OF SHEETS