Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPP 86-47 SENIOR APARTMENT/SANTA ROSE WAY 1986 I)PT:fjfSE PLAN (p J 7 TENTATIVE TRACT ZONE CHANGE PARCEL MAF� . VAFOANCE go- q 2 REFER TO APPLICANT _ tka,rrq 5c (n" l z LOCAf ION REQUEST' EXISTING ZONE PREPARATION PROGRESS DATE BY COMMENTS APPLICATION RECEIVED A. LEGAL PUBLICATION SENT NOTICES SENT ^ FIELD INVESTIGATION _ DEPTS. NOTIFIED c 13UIT.DING ENGINEERING FIRE_ POLICE RECREATION & PARKS SCHOOL. DISTRICT _DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS FLOOD CONTROL _ _._ s ti PRELIMINARY MEETING ' —STAFF REPORT 11� FINAL. PLAN APPROVAL PRECISE PLAN (6) LTNDSCAPING PLAN (5) PLAN. DIRECTOR MOD. (6) HEARINGS & ACTIONS DATE ACTION VOTE REVIEW BOARD HEARING O ` F.C. HEARING PUBLISHED PC, PUBLIC HEARING APPLICANT NOTIFIED C.C. PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE NO. _RESOLUTION NO. EFFECTIVE DATE RECORDED FOR DATA- BANK ZONING MAP CORRECTED 17 rc J zc �� �� /3, 066 4' /Of 3� Ply uni+ 51 zes (9oo9� 1 N � I r:1 � � , �.._, -. a- - PROOF OFPUIRICAYION This space Is,for the County Clerk's Filing Stamp I'.i:CEIVED '86 OCT 29 . AM. 9 15 STATE CIF.CALIFQRNIA; CITY CLERKS GFFICE Courtly of Riverside I am,a citizen of the 'United States and a CITY OF PALM DESERT resident of the County aforesaid; 1 am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to Proof of Publication of or interested in the above-entitled matter. I CASE No . PP am the principal clerk of the printer of the ••••••••••••••• .:i .VP]?. 86••-47-47...................•• DESERT POST..... .. ....................... �— CITY OF PALM•DESERT . ::.:.s.....:................................:... LEGAL NOTICE a news er of general circulation, printed CASE NO. at a p tic h pap g � NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held - ` before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a re- Bi-weekly ` quest by HARRY SCHMITZ for approval of a precise plantcondi- and published ...... ......................... I floral use permit for a seven unit senior citizen apartment project located on Santa Rosa Way, east of San Pascual Avenue, also in the City of ...Pala•Deser.t:............. known as: APN 627121 020 County of • Riverside, and which news. SAID public hearing will be held on Tuesday.November 4,1986 at paper has been adjudged a newspaper 7:00p.m.in the Council Chamber at the Palm Desert Civic Center, 73-510 Fred Waring Drive.Palm Desert.Cillfornia.at which time of general: circulation by the Superior and place all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. Court of tire. County of Riverside, State of If you callenge the proposed actions in court,you may be limited to raising only those Issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence ` California,under the date of•10,/5 19 .. delivered to the planning commission(or city council)at,or prior I ` to,the public hearing. Case Number .......3658......; that the notice; RAMON A.Planning Z.0 secretary Palm Desert Planting Commission of which the annexed Is.a printed Copy (set (Pub. D.P.Oct.24. 1986) in type not smaller than nonpareil),, has — - been published In each regular and entire. Issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, Yb•wif: 10/24 . ............:......................... all in the year 19:8f3.. I. certify (or declare) .under penalty of Rerjury that ahe foregoing Is true and correct. Dated at....}t:ektil.R!'•6RKF................... California,this:.24�h:dayof..R9t., 1986•, U ignal'ure fraa captao at this manuterm may be mcurall Intent -CALIFQRNIA NEWSPAPER SERVICE BUREAU, INC. Legal Advertising Clearing House 120 west Second St., Los Angeles,Calif. 90012 Telephone: 1213) 625.2541 /4'IN rayuart O f N<AAL Proof of►aalicall as when arNHna into form. Lsrwi )DD I NOTICE OF DETERMINATION NOV 10 1987 3 Negative Declaration COMMUNUY DEVELOPAtEM DEPARTMENT CIR OF PALM DESERT TO: (X) Clerk of the Board of Supervisors ( ) Secretary for Resources County of Riverside 1416 Ninth St. , Rm 1311 4080 Lemon Street Sacramento, CA 95814 Riverside, CA 92502 FROM: CITY OF PALM DESERT 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 SUBJECT: Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 2110E or 21152 of the Public Resources Code. Project Title/Common Name: Harry Schmitz, PP 86-47 Date of Project Approval : December 2, 1986 State Clearinghouse Number ( if submitted): N/A Contact Person: Catherine Sass Project Location: Santa Rosa Way, east of San Pascual Avenue. Project Description: Seven unit senior apartments. This is to advise that the City of Palm Desert has made the following determinations regarding the above described project: 1 . The project ( ) will , (X) will not, have a significant effect on the environment. 2. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared in connection with this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. X A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. A copy of the Negative Declaration may be examined at the above city hall address. 3. Mitigation measures (X) were, ( ) were not, made a condition of the approval of the project. 4. A statement of Overriding Considerations ( ) was, (X) was not, adopted for this project. `' '" T (! 'fir `C b n Il BOAKL) OF SUPERVISORS Signature Title �B Date Received for Filing NOV C 91987 Please return date-stamped copy in the enclosed envelope. A ='_ogaEv CLERKof tho BOARD OF SUPERVISORS County M R:vssiCe,State of Ca lifornia �:t1 l CASE ®oIlrsrn >�c� MMIROMIZITTAL SERVICES DEPT. INITIAL STUDY F"NVIR01'1dENTAL EVALUATION CRECKLIST NOTE: The availability of data necessary to address the topics listed below shall form the basis of a decision as to whether the application is considered complete for purposes of environmental assessment. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers , possible mitigation measures and comments are provided on attached sheets ) . Yes Maybe No 1 . Earth. Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? — b. Disruptions , displacements , compaction, or overcovering of the soil ? — -- .—. c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? — d. The destruction , covering, or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils , either on or off the site? — 2. Air. Will the proposal result in : a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality?, — b. The creation of objectionable odors? — c. Alteration of air movement , moisture , or temperature , or any change in climate , either locally or regionally? 3• Water. the proposal result in: Yes- Will Maw Noi a-. Changes . in currents , 'or the course or I direction of water' movements? b• Changes in-absorpt�Cn rates patterns, or the rate and- am drainage surface water runoff? ount of c- Alterations to the course or flow. flood waters? of } d- Alteration Of-the flow of ground wat direction or rate of — ers? e. Change h the quantity of ground waters, either throe drawals ugh direct additions or with_ or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? • � f. Reduction in the amount of water other- wise available for public water supplies? 4• Plant Life. Will ----_ the proposal result in: a- Change in the diversity of numbers of any speci species , or es of plants Crops) , rubs , grass , and b. Reduction of the numbers of an or endangered species of plants? y unique , rare, c- Introduction of new species of plants into an area , or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? S. AnimalLife Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in the diversity of numbers species , or of any species of animals (birds , land animals including reptiles , or insects)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or endangered species of animals? c- Introduction of new species of animals x Into an area or the migration or movement ofanimals? to d• Deterioration to existing Wildlife hab tit 77 . . 3. Yes M_ybe No 6. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in .•.the rate of use of any natural resources? b. Depletion of any non-renewable natural resource? 7. Energv, Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? _ b. Oemand upon existing sources of energy, or re- quire the.deselopment of new sources of energy? S. Risk o UPset. - Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of , hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, pesticides ,' oil , chemicals , or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? . 9. E- onom�ss Will the proposal result in: a. A change in the value of property and improvements endangered by flooding? b. A change in the value of property and ILL improverents exposed to geologic hazards beyond accepted corn:unity risk standards? 10. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels to the point at which accepted community noise and vibration levels are exceeded? ii. Land Use. Will the proposal result in the a ' era on of the present developed or Planned land use of an area? 12. Ooen Soace. Will the proposal lead to a decrease in the amount of designated open space? 13. Poouron Will the proposal result in: a. Alteraticn or the location, distribution , density, or growth rate of the human Population of the Citv? — b. Change in the population distribution by aye , income , religion, racial , or ethnic group, occupational class , household type? y 4. ` Yes Maybe No 14. Emo10 ent. Will the proposal result in additions new long-tarm jobs provided, or a change in the number and per cent employed , unemployed, and underemployed? �Q 15. Housine. Will the proposal result in: [— a. Change in number and per cent of housing units by type (price or rent range, zoning category, owner-occupied and rental , etc. ) relative to demand or to number of families in various income classes in the City? b. Impacts on existing housing or creation of a demand for additional housing? _ 16. Transoortation/Circulation. Will the proposal resu t tn: a. Generation of additional vehicular movement? b. Effects on existing parking facilities , or demand for new parking? —C. Impact upon existing transportation systems? d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? e. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , bicyclists , or pedestrians? _ — 17. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon , or resu t in a need for, new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: I a. Fire protection? b. Police protection? c. Schools ? d. Parks or other recreational facilities ? e. Maintenance of public facilities , including roads? f. Other governmental services? I f C Yes Maybe No 18. Public Fiscal Balance. Will the proposal result in a net change in government fiscal flow (revenues less operating expenditures and annualized capital expenditures)? 19. Utilities . Will the proposal result in a need for new systems , or alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? b. Communications system? C. Water? d. Sewer or septic tanks? e. Storm water drainage? — f. Solid waste and disposal ? 20. Human Health. Will the proposal result in: a. The creation of any health hazard or Potential health hazard? b. A change in the level of community health 7`— care provided? _ — 21 . Socal Se r/ices . Will the proposal result in i an ncreased demand far provision of general social .services? 22. Aesthetics . Will the proposal result in: a . Obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public? b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? c. Lessening of the overall neighborhood (or area ) attractiveness , plea-santness , and uniqueness? 23. Licht and Glare. Will the ne:v fight or g are? proposal produce , ( 24. Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal Ix result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure , object, or building? _ — i l 6. Yes Maybe No 25. Mandatory Findings of Significance. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment or to curtail the diversity in the environment? b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future. ) _ _ — c. Does the project have impacts which are indi- vidually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small , but where the effect of the total of those impacts an the environment is significant. ) _ — d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings , either directly or indirectly? Initial Study Prepared By: c- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1193 A RESOLIJ I I ON OF THE PI.ANN I Nr, i:OMM I SS I t1N OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT , I.A[- 11OPNIA, APPROVING, A PRECISE PLAN OF DESIGN TO ALLOW I:ONF"I'RI II�T I ON OF A SEVEN UNIT SENIOR C1Tl EN APARTMFNI PRr1JECT LOCATED ON SANIA ROSA WAY, EAST OF SAN PASCHAL AVENUE. CASE NO. PP/CUP 86-47 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of ilrP City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 2nd day of December, 1986, held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the request of HARRY SCHMITZ for Fie ahove mentioned project; and WHEREAS, said application has cnmplierl with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedure for Implement:3tion of the California Envirnnmental Quality Act , Resolution No. 80-89. " in that the director of community development has determined that the project will not have a significant impact on the environment and a negative declaration Yeas heen prepat ed; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing , upon hearing and considering all . testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested . persnns desiring to be heard, said planning commission did find the following facts and reasons to exist to justify granting approval of said precise plan and conditional use permit: I . The design of the precise plan will not substantially depreciate property values in the vicinity. 2. The precise plan will not unreasonably ini:erfere with the use or enjoyment of property in the vicinity by the occupants thereof for lawful purposes. 3. The precise plan will not endanaer the pulblic peace, health, safety or general welfare. 4. The proposed location of the conditional use is in accord with the objectives of the zoning ordinance and the purpose of the district in which the site is located. 5. The proposed location of the eonditinnal u,e and the conditions under which it will be operated and maintained will not be detrimental to the Public health. safety or general welfare., or be materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 6. The proposed conditional use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of this title , eyrept for' approved variances or adjustments. 7. The proposed conditional use cnmplies with the goals, objectives, and policies of the city's adopted general plan. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1193 I NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: I . '(hat the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the commission in this case; 2. That approval of Precise Plan/Conditional Use Permit 86-47 is hereby granted for reasons subject to the attached conditions. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this end day of December, 1986, by the following vote, to wit• AYES: DOWNS, RICHARDS, WHITLOCK, AND ERWOOD NOES: NONE 9 ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE / i /y RICHARD ERWOOD, Chairman ATTEST: -X— A'01 V� RAMON A. DIAZ, Secret✓ -- /tm 2 PLANNING.COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1193 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO. PP/CUP 86-41 Department of Community Development_ 1 . The development of the property shall ronform snhstantially with exhibits on file with the department of community development/planning; as modified by the following conditions. 2. Construction of a portion of said project ;hall commence within One year from the date of final approval unless an extension of time is granted; otherwise said approval shall become null , void and of no effect whatsoever. 3. The development of the property described herein ,hall he subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein which are in addition to all municipal ordinances and state_ and federal statutes now in force, or which hereafter may he in force. 4. Prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contemplated by this approval , the applicant shall first obtain permits and/or clearance from the following agencies! Coachella Valley Water District Palm Desert Architectural Commission City Fire Marshal Public Works Department Palm Desert Water & Services listrirt Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to the department of building and safety at. the time of issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. 5. Trash provisions shall be approved by applicable trash company and city prior to issuance of building permit. 6. A deed restriction shall be added to the property limiting occupants to a minimum age of 62 years. The city shall have the 3h1lity to audit the property owners rental records at any time to insures compliance. 7. Applicant shall provide a minimum of three covered parl<ing spaces. B. Project shall pay school fees as determined by Desert Sands Unified School District. 3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1193 0. The apartments shall be equipped with solid core entry/exit doors with 190 degree door viewers , dead-bolt locks and locking devices on all windows and sliding doors to provide security for the residents. 10. All project landscaping shall be provided to the approval of staff, with plant materials approved and placed per the architectural review board and number of table/benches, etc. per submitted plan. I1 . Perimeter walls shall be six root block or as determined by staff. Department of Public Works: I . Drainage and signalization fund fees, as required by city ordinance, shall be paid prior to grading permit issuance. 2. Full public improvements, including traffic safety lighting as required by ordinance and the director of public works, shall be installed in accordance with city standards. 3. Improvement plans for water and sewer systems shall be approved by the respective service districts with "as-built" plans submitted to the department of public works prior to the project final . 4. Complete improvement plans and , specifications 'shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the director of public works for checking and approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. The engineer shall submit "es-huilt" plans prior to the acceptance of the Improvements by the city. 5. All private. driveways and parking lots shall be inspected by the engineering department and a standard inspection fee shall be paid prior to grading permit issuance. 6. Landscaping maintenance on Santa Rosa Way shall be provided by the property owner. - 7. Complete grading plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the director of public works for checking and approval prior to issuance of=. any permits. a. Dedication of five feet of right-of-way on Santa Rosa Way shall be done prior to issuance of any permits and approval of plans. 9. Installation of curb and gutter , matching paving and six foot sidewalk on Santa Rosa Way. 4 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1193 10. Offsite improvement plans to be approved by public works department and a surety posted to guarantee the required offsite improvements prior to grading permit issuance. 11 . Installation of sewers to serve this project. 12. Size, number and location of driveways to pulilir. works specifications with only one driveway approach to be allowed to serve this property. 13. Any and all off-site improvements shall be preceded by the approval of plans and the issuance of valid encroachment permit(s) by the department of public works. 14. A complete preliminary soils investigation, conducted by a registered soils engineer, shall be submitted to and approved by the department of public works prior to issuance of the grading permit. 15. Site drainage shall be from the rear of the lot to the street , notwithstanding the proposed landscaping and site development scheme, to the satisfaction of the director of public works and the director of community development. 5 it.. C 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 December 30, 1986 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION ACTION CASE NO: 317 MF APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) : HARRY SCHMITZ, P.O. Box 3992, Palm Desert, CA 92260. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Final approval of seven unit senior apartment project. LOCATION: Santa Rosa between San Pascual and Portola. ZONE: R-3 S.O. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Upon reviewing the submitted plans and presentations by staff and by the applicant, the architectural commission approved this case by minute motion. Date of Action: December 23, 1986 Vote: Carried 3- 1- I (Commissioner Cook abstaining - Commissioner Martin opposed) (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen ( 15) days of the date of the decision. ) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ STAFF COMMENTS: Please read the attached minutes. Y MINUTES PALM DESERT ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION TUESDAY, DECEMBER 23, 1986 1 :00 P.M. COMMUNITY SERVICES CONFERENCE ROOM 73-510 FRED HARING DRIVE N N N N N N N N N X N N N N N X N N N N N N X N N X N N N N X M N N N N M X N I. The meeting was called to order at 1 :00 pm after a one hour study session. Commission Members Current Meeting Year to Date Present Absent Present Absent Ron Gregory, Chairman X 23 1 Al Cook X 18 6 Mary Drury X 16 8 Charlie Martin X 23 1 Russell McCrea X 20 4 Rick Holden, Alternate X 18 6 Staff Present: Ray Diaz Steve Smith Catherine Sass Phil Drell Donna Gomez It was moved by Commissioner McCrea, seconded by Commissioner Martin to approve the minutes of December 9, 1986 as written. Carried 3-0-2 (Commissioners' Cook and Holden abstaining) . If . Moved by Commissioner Holden, seconded by Commissioner Cook to approve the following cases by minute motion. Carried 5-0 (Chairman Gregory abstaining on Case No. 306 C, Commissioner Cook abstaining on Case No. 317 MF and Commissioner Martin opposed Case No. 317 MF) . 1. CASE NO: 1275 SA APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) : RANDALL VENTURA, 73-895 Highway III , Palm Desert, CA 92260. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of awning with signage. LOCATION: 73-895 Highway III (rear of building on President's Plaza) . ZONE: C-1 S.P. 2. CASE NO: 322 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) : BAKERS SQUARE RESTAURANT, 9415 Greenleaf, Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of a facade renovation and landscape plan. i r MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION DECEMBER 23, 1986 LOCATION: South side of Highway 111 , 100 feet east of Highway 74. ZONE• C-1 S.P. 3. CASE NO• 317 MF APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) : HARRY SCHMITZ, P.O. Box 3992, Palm Desert, CA 92260. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Final approval of seven unit senior apartment project. LOCATION: Santa Rosa between San Pascual and Portola. ZONE: R-3 S.O. 4. CASE NO: 306 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) : AHMANSON DEVELOPMENTS, 1001 Commerce Drive, Building E2, Irwindale, CA 91706. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Final approval of 149,600 square foot retail commercial development. LOCATION: Northwest corner Town Center Way and Highway Ill . ZONE: PC 3 5. CASE NO: 298 MF APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): JOHN DELLA, 263 N. Saturmino Drive, Palm Springs, CA 92262. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Final approval of landscape plan. LOCATION: South side Driftwood Street, 90 feet west of Deep Canyon. ZONE: R-3 (3) Approval subject to revisions noted on the plan. III. CASES: A. Final Drawings: 1. CASE NO: 271 C 2 I CITY OF PALM DESERT DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT TO: PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: NOVEMBER 4, 1986 CASE NO: PP/CUP 86-47 REQUEST: Approval of a negative declaration of environmental impact, precise plan of design and conditional use permit to allow construction of a seven unit senior citizen apartment project located on Santa Rosa Way, east of San Pascual Avenue. APPLICANT: HARRY H. SCHMITZ P.O. Box 3992 Palm Desert, CA 92261 I. BACKGROUND: A. DESCRIPTION OF SITE: The property is vacant, approximately 13,000 square feet, relatively level and gently sloping to the north. B. ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE: NORTH: R-3, S.O./Vacant SOUTH: R-2, S.O./Multi-family housing EAST: R-3, S.O./Six-plex WEST: R-3, S.O./Single family residence C. GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION: Medium density residential . II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A. CODE PROVISIONS IN CHART FORM: Code Requirement Provided unit size 450 sq. ft. 560 sq. ft. parking 7 spaces 8 spaces height 24 ft. 12 ft. setback 10/20/20 10/22/20 open space 300 sq. ft. "see below q1P building coverage 50% max. 33% Y STAFF REPORT - PP/CUP 86-47 NOVEMBER 4, 1986 The required open space is defined as group usable/common open space, intended to be landscaped and/or recreational . To arrive at the provided open space requirement the entire interior area on the site plan could be landscaped - not just the median areas as indicated. This calculation would provide 352 square feet/dwelling unit of open space. As presented, over 50% of the site is in paving or other hard surface and only 625 square feet could be considered landscaped or recreational . B. SITE DESIGN, PARKING AND ACCESS: The proposed design is for seven 560 square foot studio apartments located in two rows facing each other. Parking spaces, including four carport spaces, are provided directly off the street taking the southern third of the site. A perimeter block wall six feet in height wi l l surround the building area. The common area is wheel chair accessible. C. ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPING: The architecture and landscaping meet minimum requirements with the exception of open space. The applicant shows a chain link fence in the front yard which will have to be replaced with block wall , wrought iron, or other acceptable material . III. DISCUSSION: Staff finds the studio design of the units attractive. The building placement and common area appear crowded and the open space appears unusable. The design review board felt deleting one unit would provide additional open space and landscaping. Staff is concerned with crowded, poorly designed common areas encouraging shut-ins among senior residents. Further conflict exists where backing space interferes with planter areas. The deletion of the one space over requirement would provide additional space for backing. The architectural review committee directed the applicant in favor of the above improvements. The applicant has chosen to continue presentation to the planning commission without any redesign. IV. ANALYSIS: Staff finds that the proposed project, without suggested mitigation measures, does not reflect the unique requirements of senior citizens nor 2 STAFF REPORT - PP/CUP 86-47 NOVEMBER 4, 1986 does the overall quality of design reflect the intent of the senior housing overlay. Staff feels they would be doing a disservice recommending approval of studio apartments that provide no outside amenity, gathering place, or common recreational areas for our city's senior citizens. V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends denial of the application based on the above. A. Adopt the findings. B. Adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. denying PP/CUP 86-47. VI. ATTACHMENTS: A. Draft resolution. B. Legal notice. C. Exhibits and supporting data. Prepared by Reviewed and Approved by /tm 3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, DENYING A PRECISE PLAN OF DESIGN FOR A SEVEN UNIT SENIOR CITIZEN APARTMENT PROJECT LOCATED ON SANTA ROSA WAY, EAST OF SAN PASCUAL AVENUE. CASE NO. PP/CUP 86-47 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 4th day of November, 1986, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider the request of HARRY SCHMITZ for denial of a negative declaration of environmental impact, precise plan of design and conditional use permit to allow the construction of the above described project on a lot on Santa Rosa Way, more particularly described as: APN 627-121-020 WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said planning commission did find the following facts and reasons to exist to justify denial of said precise plan and conditional use permit: 1 . Open space is insufficient. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1 . That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the commission in this case; 2. That approval of Precise Plan/Conditional Use Permit 86-47 are hereby denied. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 4th day of November, 1986, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: BUFORD CRITES, Chairman ATTEST: RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary /tm CITY OF PALM DESERT )tJ INTEROFFICE MEMO �aMM�N/Y0Cr2� �¢ c `Ij,iA 01, TO: Catherine Sass Fi1r 9lyFvt FROM: Brent Conley RE: 86-47 Seven Unit Senior Apt. Bldg. DATE: October 23, 1986 The apartments as proposed should be equipped with solid core entry/exit doors with 190 degree doorviewers, deadbolt locks and locking devices on all windows and sliding doors to provide security for the residents. The apartment plan could be enhanced by possibly moving the spa area to the center of the complex to allow easier occupant access. The area at the front where the spa is proposed could be changed to include picnic tables and chairs to encourage residents to socialize. 1. The main entrance will probably have the complex' s mail box and residents could use the common area to gather and sort mail . The lighting of the complex is very important to add to the feeling of security for the residents. A minimum standard of 1/2 FC for the interior of the complex and 1 FC for the parking area Isis e`�al . Brent Conley Crime Prevention Officer BC/rrt CITY OF PALM DESERT DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT TO: PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: NOVEMBER 4, 1986 CASE NO: PP/CUP 86-47 REQUEST: Approval of a negative declaration of environmental impact, precise plan of design and conditional use permit to allow construction of a seven unit senior citizen apartment project located on Santa Rosa Way, east of San Pascual Avenue. APPLICANT: HARRY H. SCHMITZ P.O. Box 3992 Palm Desert, CA 92261 I. BACKGROUND: A. DESCRIPTION OF SITE: The property is vacant, approximately 13,000 square feet, relatively level and gently sloping to the north. B. ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE: NORTH: R-3, S.O./Vacant SOUTH: R-2, S.O./Multi-family housing EAST: R-3, S.O./Six-plex WEST: R-3, S.O./Single family residence C. GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION: Medium density residential . 11. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A. CODE PROVISIONS IN CHART FORM: Code Requirement Provided unit size 450 sq. ft. 600 sq. ft. density for 600 sq. ft. units on 13,000 sq. ft. lot 6 7 people per acre/13,000 sq. ft. 10 12.25 parking 7 spaces 8 spaces height 24 ft. 12 ft. setback 10/20/20 10/22/20 J STAFF REPORT PP/CUP 86-47 NOVEMBER 4, 1986 Code Requirement Provided open space per d.u. 300 sq. ft. 92 sq. ft" building coverage 50% max. 33% The senior overlay density is based on unit size. The applicant has provided studio apartments at the one bedroom square footage. A generous calculation on this site would only allow six units, at 10 P/A. The required open space is defined as group usable/common open space, intended to be landscaped and/or recreational . As presented, over 50% of the site is in paving or other hard surface and only 625 square feet could be considered landscaped or recreational . B. SITE DESIGN, PARKING AND ACCESS: The proposed design is for seven 600 square foot studio apartments located in two rows facing each other. Parking spaces, including four carport spaces, are provided directly off the street taking the southern third of the site. A perimeter block wall six feet in height wi 1 1 surround the building area. The common area is wheel chair accessible. C. ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPING: The architecture and landscaping meet minimum requirements with the exception of open space. The applicant shows a chain link fence in the front yard which will have to be replaced with block wall , wrought iron, or other acceptable material . II1. DISCUSSION: Staff finds the studio design of the units attractive. The building placement and common area appear crowded and the open space appears unusable. The design review board felt deleting one unit would provide additional open space and landscaping. Staff is concerned with crowded, poorly designed common areas encouraging shut-ins among senior residents. Further conflict exists where backing space interferes with planter areas. The deletion of the one space over requirement would provide additional space for backing. 2 STAFF REPORT PP/CUP 86-47 NOVEMBER 4, 1986 The architectural review committee directed the applicant in favor of the above improvements. The applicant has chosen to continue presentation to the planning commission without any redesign. IV. ANALYSIS: Staff finds that the proposed project, without suggested mitigation measures, does not reflect the unique requirements of senior citizens nor does ,the overall quality of design reflect the intent of the senior housing overlay. Staff! feels they would be doing a disservice recommending approval of studio apartments that provide no outside amenity, gathering place, or common recreational areas for our city's senior citizens. V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends denial of the application based on the above. A. Adopt the findings. B. Adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. , denying PP/CUP 86-47. VI. ATTACHMENTS: A. Draft resolution. B. Legal notice. C. Exhibits and supporting data. Prepared by ( _ S C.� Reviewed and Approved by /tm 3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, DENYING A PRECISE PLAN OF DESIGN FOR A SEVEN UNIT SENIOR CITIZEN APARTMENT PROJECT LOCATED ON SANTA ROSA WAY, EAST OF SAN PASCUAL AVENUE. CASE NO. PP/CUP 86-47 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 4th day of November, 1986, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider the request of HARRY SCHMITZ for denial of a negative declaration of environmental impact, precise plan of design and conditional use permit to allow the construction of the above described project on a lot on Santa Rosa Way, more particularly described as: APN 627-121-020 WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said planning commission did find the following facts and reasons to exist to justify denial of said precise plan and conditional use permit: 1 . Open space is insufficient. 2. Density and intensity is too high. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1 . That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the commission in this case; 2. That approval of Precise Plan/Conditional Use Permit 86-47 are hereby denied. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 4th day of November, 1986, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: BUFORD CRITES, Chairman ATTEST: RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary /tm 73.510 FRED WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 October 21, 1985 CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE CASE NO. PP/CUP 86-47 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by HARRY SCHMITZ for approval of a precise plan/conditional use permit for a seven unit senior citizen apartment project located on Santa Rosa Way, east of San Pascual Avenue, also known as: APN 627-121-020 %.. - �4'" art•« AVE ., ,. a ra•11 nYaen Jt:'E nr 'nn _Rn.�` as '$at ,aI r t, ^ J• e I � I Si �I,.I � I .i`.r p(, . . Nt OnM fI ID , 1v11 Ar WAY S BK. tes a i q��; { IC [S , i DSO, O.It t,< NNu a(ttu pJstel /22 rrJs ^ �tr MB ZO/3l PobnO V'/lvDe Groves, KE1//56-A Po/ V)/o0e Gar✓rn Tivc/ /3 MB 5/ A/➢.2rs Trotl - ME 34 53 RermosD Sondl IS118 R.S/B//B tt;^.SORT 11A^B/. C%O$d R/VF S/OE COIMr,r, GUf SAID public hearing will be held on Tuesday, November 4, 1986, at 7:00 p.m. In the Council Chamber at the Palm Desert Civic Center, 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all Interested persons are Invited to attend and be heard. If you challenge the proposed actions In court, you may be limited to raising only those Issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described In this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the planning commission (or city council) at, or prior to, the public hearing. PUBLISH: Palm Desert Post - RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary October 24, 1986 - Palm Desert Planning Commission CITY OF PALM DESERT n INTEROFFICE MEMO1 of 4y. TO: Catherine Sass P�MnE,Fce�, FROM: Brent Conley RE: 86-47 Seven Unit Senior Apt. Bldg. DATE: October 23, 1986 The apartments as proposed should be equipped with solid core entry/exit doors with 190 degree doorviewers, deadbolt locks and locking devices on all windows and sliding doors to provide security for the residents. The apartment plan could be enhanced by possibly moving the spa area to the center of the complex to allow easier occupant access. The area at .the front where the spa is proposed could be changed to include picnic tables and chairs to encourage residents to socialize. The main entrance will probably have the complex' s mail box and residents could use the common area to gather and sort mail . The lighting of the complex is very important to add to the feeling of security for the residents. A minimum standard of 1/2 FC for the interior of the complex and 1 FC for the parking area is essential . Brent Conley Crime Prevention Officer BC/rrt F INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES FROM : DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS OCT 2 4 1986 SUBJECT: f�)SE, FLAN ��-� COMMLNICITY CF PALM4DESEAT"R1ME"41 DATE ToBBFZ 20� I q86 The following should be considered conditions of approval : ODrainage and signalization fund fees , as required by City ordinance , shall be paid prior to (-recGpdatinn ef the final FRaP (gradi1iig permit issuance) . 2 ) Drainage facilities shall be provided, per Ordinance No . 218 and the Master Drainage Plan , to the specifications of the Director of Public Works . 3 ) Storm drain construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study by the private engineer that is approved by the Department of Public Works . 04 Full public improvements , including traffic safety lighting, as required by ordinance and the Director of Public Works , shall be installed in accordance with City standards . Improvement plans for water and sewer systems shall be approved by the respective service districts with "as-built" plans submitted to the Department of Public Works prior to the project final . O6 Complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted , as required by ordinance , to the Director of Public Works for checking and approval before construction of any improvements is commenced . The engineer shall submit "as-built" plans prior to the acceptance of the improvements by the City. O7 All private (, (driveways and parking lots ) shall be inspected by the engineering department and a standard Inspection fee shall be paid prior to " .+a4--,i5l!r ) (grading permit Issuance) . Landscaping maintenance on shall be provided by the ( hemeowne - (property owner) .. 9) Existing utilities on shall be undergrounded per each respective utility dis- trict' s recommendation . If determined to be unfeasible applicant shall agree to participate in any future utility undergrounding district . 10 ) Traffic safety striping on shall be provided to the specifications of the Director of Public Works . A traffic control plan must be submitted to and approved by the Director of Public Works before placing pavement markings . Il Complete grading plans and specifications shall be submit- ted , as required by ordinance , to the Director of Public Works for checking and approval prior to issuance of any permits . Dedication of _feet of right-of-way on 2a yS P,-_ ;�g _ shall be done prior to issuance of any perm is and approval of plans . 13 Installation of curb and gutter , matching paving and SIX {�� sidewalk on _S 9,2s a lN� 14 ) Waiver of access to except at approved locations shall be granted on the final map . 15 ) Close unused driveway with full height curb and gutter . 16 Offsite improvement plans to be approved by Public Works Department and a surety posted to guarantee the required offsite improvements prior to ( i wap) (grading permit issuance ) . 17,) Full improvement of interior streets based on ( 60 ' residen- tial ) (private ) ( industrial ) street standards as established In accordance with Chapter 26 , Section 26. 40 . 040 , C . P . D . Code . 18 ) Installation of one-half landscaped median in or cash payment for one-half the cost of landscaped median at the option of the Director of Public Works . 19) Traffic analysis to be prepared for the project to address the specific impacts on existing networks ( street and intersections ) and the proposed mitigation measures recom- mended for approval by the City. 20 Installation of sewers to serve this project . 0Size , number and location of driveways to Public Works 0 specifications with only ch.0 , driveway approach (ms) to be allowed to serve this property. 22 ) No (new) requirements . (Original conditions apply) 23 ) Grading permit issuance shall be subject to the waiver of parcel map first being approved and recorded . 24) Complete (parcel ) (tract ) map ( s ) shall be submitted as required by ordinance to the Director of Public Works for checking and approval and be recorded before issuance of any permits . 25 Any and all off-site improvements shall be preceded by the approval of plans and the issuance of valid encroachment Permit ( 5 ) by the Department of Public Works . 8Acomplete preliminary soils Investigation , conducted by a 8 registered soils engineer , shall be submitted to and approv- ed by the Department of Public Works prior to issuance of the grading permit . 27 ) Applicant shall secure reciprocal ingress and egress access easements from the owner ( s ) of lot( s ) 28 S 29) Richard J . Folkers , P . E . I- RA/RJF Rev . 7/25/86 i . i 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 Date DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING AND SAFETY PRELIMINARY REVIEW OF PLANS THIS IS NOT A PLAN CHECKI DEVELOPMENT: L The comments below are based on the following assumptions and code groups: 1985 Uniform Building Code 1985 Uniform Plumbing Code 1985 Uniform Mechanical Code 1984 National Electrical Code Title 24 Handicapp / Accessibility Standards Title 24 Energy Conservation Standards Title 24 Multi-Famlly Adaptability Standards Code Assumption: Building Classification f� Type of Construction Sprinklered Allowable Floor Area: Basic Allowable Setbacks Sprinklered Multi-Story Factor Total Allowable Sq.Ft. ( v O CHECKLIST lans shall be prepared by a licensed California architect. Show current number on plans. ubmit a list of features proposed that show compliance to the multi- ly handicapp regulations. Use a maximum cap of $740.00 per adapt- able dwelling unit. e Page two. . . HANDICAPPED: Site requirements per handicapp standards. PARKING: [13 Show number of stalls required. '\O� Revise parking stall locations to allow main entry access. Show international logo, loading and unloading zone requirements. Ramp from parking lot to sidewalk not shown on plans. BUILDING ACCESS: ❑ Doors shall be minimum 32" clear in width. \� ❑ Provide 18" space on the swing side of doors. ❑ On plans, show height of all bathroom accessories. ❑ Handicapp bathroom layout does not conform to current standards. Before further comments can be made, additional plans and specifications are needed for review. The following plans must be submitted to the Department of Building & Safety for Ian review: Architectural Drawings and Details. Structural Drawings and Calculations. Complete Electrical , Mechanical and Plumbing Plans and Specifications. title 24 Energy Conservation Documentation Forms. COMMENTS: LLER PRINCIPAL PLANS EXAMINER RIVERSIDE COUNTY ofCAL/;, ' FIRE DEPARTMENT z � 1 _� J IN COOPERATION WITH THE UN TY CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY RIVERS/DE RAY HEBRARD 4ryENr OF I FIRE CHIEF �_?�IO WEST SAN JACINTO AVENUE October ld 8;1�6�Y1d\Vjl 10]iPERRIS,CALIFORNIA 92370 4L'•l+ CC,�AI L�Li �V49. C••! TELEPHONE:(714)6573183 Ramon Diaz Planning and Community OCT 2 1 1986 Development Director 73510 Fred Waring COMMUNICTD V ELO PPLMLDESERPARTMENT Palm Desert, CA 92260 Reference: PP 86-47 Applicant: Harry Schmitz Dear Mr. Ramon Diaz The following fire protection requirements are in accordance with the Uniform Fire Code and Life Safety Code standards. 1 . Install a water system capable of delivering 25ooGPM fire flow from any fire hydrant for a 2 hour.duration in addition to domestic supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement. 2. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants so that no point of any building is more than 250 feet from a fire hydrant measured along approved vehicular travel ways . a. exterior surface of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow, and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. b. curbs shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. c. hydrants shall not be located closer than 25 feet to any building. 3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and three copies of the water system plan to the Fire Marshal for review. Upon approval , one copy will be sent to the Building Department and the original will be returned to the developer. 4. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and approved by the water company with the following certification: "I; certify that the design of the water system in PP 86-47 is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Fire Marshal ." 5. Prior to delivery of combustible materials to the building site, the required water system shall be installed, operating and delivering the required flow. 6. Additional fire protection requirements may be necessary when the applicant submits specific plans for consideration and approval . 7. All buildings over N/A square feet require an approved fire sprinkler system. Very truly yours, RAY HEBRARD ,Fire IChief � Q MIKE MCCONNELL Fire Marshal Sc�n0C' � C:N 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 FACILITIES PLANNER REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OCT 10 IN6 AM PM 7181911011111211121314016 CASE NO(S) : PP 86-47 ! PROJECT: Seven unit senior apartment building, APPLICANT: Harry H. Schmitz, P.O. Box 3992, Palm Desert 92261-3992 Enclosed please find materials describing a project for which the following is being requested: Construction of a seven-unit senior apartment building on Santa Rosa between San Pascual and Portola. The attached data was prepared by the applicant and is being forwarded to you for comments and recommended conditions of approval . The city is interested in the probable impacts on the environment ( including land, air, water, minerals, flora, fauna, noise, objects of historical or aesthetic significance) and recommended conditions of approval based on your expertise and area of concern. Your comments and recommended conditions of approval must be received by this office prior to 4:30 p.m. October 231_1986, in order to be discussed by the land division committee. The an division committee (comprised of director Of community development, city building official , city engineer, fire marshal , and a representative of CVWD) will discuss the comments and recommended conditions of approval and will forward them to the planning commission through the staff report. Any information received by this office after the receipt deadline will not be discussed by the land division committee. Sincerely, DSUSD COMMENT: School mpact ill -- ' ------ ------------- occur. iPlease Wrequire RAYMON A. DIAZ by--L mitigation. DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT/PLANNING CS/tm Attachments PLEASE RETURN MAP WITH COMMENTS 1' 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NOTICE OF ACTION Date: December 3, 1986 Mr. Harry Schmitz P.O. Box 3992 Palm Desert, CA 92261 Re PP 86-47 The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of December 2, 1986. APPROVED BY ADOPTION OF PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1193 AS AMENDED. CARRIED 4-0. Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Community Development, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen ( 15) days of the date of the decision. r RAMON A. DIAZ, SECRET PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION RAD/tm PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1193 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PRECISE PLAN OF DESIGN TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A SEVEN UNIT SENIOR CITIZEN APARTMENT PROJECT LOCATED ON SANTA ROSA WAY, EAST OF SAN PASCUAL AVENUE. CASE NO. PP/CUP 86-47 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 2nd day of December, 1986, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider the request of HARRY SCHMITZ for the above mentioned project; and WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedure for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 80-89, " in that the director of community development has determined that the project will not have a significant Impact on the environment and a negative declaration has been prepared; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of ail interested persons desiring to be heard, said planning commission did find the following facts and reasons to exist to justify granting approval of said precise plan and conditional use permit: 1 . The design of the precise plan will not substantially depreciate property values in the vicinity. 2. The precise plan will not unreasonably interfere with the use or enjoyment of property in the vicinity by the occupants thereof for lawful purposes. 3. The precise plan will not endanger the public peace, health, safety or general welfare. 4. The proposed location of the conditional use is in accord with the objectives of the zoning ordinance and the purpose of the district In which the site is located. 5. The proposed location of the conditional use and the conditions under which it will be operated and maintained will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare, or be materially Injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 6. The proposed conditional use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of this title, except for approved variances or adjustments. 7. The proposed conditional use complies with the goals, objectives, and policies of the city's adopted general plan. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1193 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: I . That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the commission in this case; 2. That approval of Precise Plan/Conditional Use Permit 86-47 is hereby granted for reasons subject to the attached conditions. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 2nd day of December, 1986, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: DOWNS, RICHARDS, WHITLOCK, AND ERWOOD NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE j �RICHARD ERWOOD, Chairman ATTEST: RAMON A. DIAZ, Secreta • /tm 2 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1193 ICONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO. PP/CUP 86-47 Department of Community Development: 1 . The development of the property shall conform substantially with exhibits on file with the department of community development/planning, as modified by the following conditions. 2. Construction of a portion of said project shall commence within one year from the date of final approval unless an extension of time is granted; otherwise said approval shall become null , void and of no effect whatsoever. 3. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein which are in addition to all municipal ordinances and state and federal statutes now in force, or which hereafter may be in force. 4. Prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contemplated by this approval , the applicant shall first obtain permits and/or clearance from the following agencies: Coachella Valley Water District Palm Desert Architectural Commission City Fire Marshal Public Works Department Palm Desert Water & Services District Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to the department of building and safety at the time of issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. 5. Trash provisions shall be approved by applicable trash company and city prior to issuance of building permit. . 6. A deed restriction shall be added to the property limiting occupants to a minimum age of 62 years. The city shall have the ability to audit the property owners rental records at any time to insure compliance. 7. Applicant shall provide a minimum of three covered parking spaces. 8. Project shall pay school fees as determined by Desert Sands Unified School District. 3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1193 i 9. The apartments shall be equipped with solid core entry/exit doors with 190 degree door viewers , dead-bolt locks and locking devices on all windows and sliding doors to provide security for the residents. 10. All project landscaping shall be provided to the approval of staff, with plant materials approved and placed per the architectural review board and number of table/benches, etc. per submitted plan. I1 . Perimeter walls shall be six foot block or as determined by staff. Department of Public Works: 1 . Drainage and signalization fund fees, as required by city ordinance, shall be paid prior to grading permit issuance. 2. Full public Improvements, Including traffic safety lighting as required by ordinance and the director of public works, shall be installed in accordance with city standards. 3. Improvement plans for water and sewer systems shall be approved by the respective service districts with "as-built" plans submitted to the department of public works prior to the project final . 4. Complete improvement plans and specifications 'shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the director of public works for checking and approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. The engineer shall submit "as-built" plans prior to the acceptance of the improvements by the city. 5. All private driveways and parking lots shall be inspected by the engineering department and a standard inspection fee shall be paid prior to grading permit Issuance. 6. Landscaping maintenance on Santa Rosa Way shall be provided by the property owner. 7. Complete grading plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the director of public works for checking and approval prior to issuance of any permits. 8. Dedication of five feet of right-of-way on Santa Rosa Way shall be done prior to issuance of any permits and approval of plans. 9. Installation of curb and gutter, matching paving and six foot sidewalk on Santa Rosa Way. 4 _ f PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1193 10. Offsfte improvement plans to be approved by public works department and a surety posted to guarantee the required offsite improvements prior to grading permit issuance. 11 . installation of sewers to serve this project. 12. Size, number and location of driveways to public works specifications with only one driveway approach to be allowed to serve this property. 13. Any and all off-site improvements shall be preceded by the approval of plans and the issuance of valid encroachment permlt(s) by the department of public works. 14. A complete preliminary soils investigation, conducted by a registered soils engineer, shall be submitted to and approved by the department of public works prior to issuance of the grading permit. 15. Site drainage shall be from the rear of the lot to the street , notwithstanding the proposed landscaping and site development scheme, to the satisfaction of the director of public works and the director of community development. 5 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION DECEMBER 2, 1986 Mr. Diaz responded that the request was for a duplex so] it and he felt that it was a minor amendment that could be handled at staff level . Commission concurred. Vill . PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Continued Case No. PP 86-45 - THOMAS MILLER, Applicant Request for approval of a negative declaration of environmental impact and a precise plan of design to allow construction of 168 unit inn, a full service restaurant and a gas station on 10 acres in the PC (4) S.P. and PR-5 N, S.P. at the northeast corner of Highway III and Deep Canyon Road. Ms. Sass outlined the five issues that were to be addressed by the applicant as discussed in the staff report. Staff requested a two-week continuance. Mr. Diaz also noted that photos were being sent from Scottsdale and Santa Barbara of the gas station. Chairman Erwood opened the public testimony and asked if the applicant wished to address the commission. MR. SANDY BAUM, 45-800 Deep Canyon Road, stated that he was aware of the request for a continuance and had notified all the parties. Commissioner Whitlock asked if the rase would go to the architectural commission before the next planning commission meeting. Ms. Sass replied yes. Action: Moved by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner Downs, approving a continuance to December 16, 1986. Carried 4-0. B. Continued Case No.. PP/P 8� - HARRY SCHMITZ, Applicant Request for approval of a negative declaration of environmental impact, precise plan of design and conditional use permit to allow construction of a seven unit senior citizen apartment project located on Santa Rosa Way, east of San Pascual Avenue. 2 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION DECEMBER 2, 1986 I Ms . Sass outlined the salient points of the staff report and recommended approval . Chairman Erwood opened the public testimony and asked if the applicant wished to address the commission. MR. HARRY SCHMITZ, applicant_, stated that he would prefer a two-story site plan which would require eight units to make the project feasible because of an elevator and balconies, and asked the commission to consider this concept. He indicated that the present plan was one story and seven units. He expressed concern regarding condition #I1 under community development regarding wall height because of the grading required by public works. Mr. Diaz responded that because of the sensitivity of grading, the condition should remain as stated and further studied by public works. Mr. Schmitz also indicated that condition #15 under public works required a 1% slope . Mr . Gaugush concurred and indicated that some adjustments can be made in certain situations and that the entire lot may not be 1%. Mr. Schmitz also indicated that one wall was already chain link with oleanders, but that staff was requiring a block wall . Mr. Diaz Indicated that since the lot could be raised three feet with a building on top of that, staff would need some type of preliminary grading plan for this project. Commissioner Richards stated that the commission did not need to be involved with this unless it could not be settled between the applicant and staff, and in that event it should be referred to city council . Mr. Diaz stated that the condition should be modified by the addition of the words, ". . .to the satisfaction of the director of public works and the director of community development . " Commission concurred. Mr. Schmitz said that was acceptable. Mr. Schmitz stated that he was opposed to condition #8 regarding school impact fees imposed by the school district. He stated for the record that it has not been proven satisfactorily that persons of age 62 and older impact the school system. Mr . Diaz stated that even if that condition was not required by community development, the building department would require it before a building permit was issued. Chairman Erwood asked if anyone present wished to speak in FAVOR or 3 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION DECEMBER 2, 1986 OPPOSITION to the proposed. There being no one, the public testimony was closed. Commissioner Richards addressed the Issue of a two-story project and stated that he was not prepared to expand the site to eight units. He felt that the final project was better and asked staff about the six foot high block wall . Mr. Diaz replied that if the adjacent property owners do not object with the lower three foot wall , staff did not have a problem and the oleanders were fine. Action: Moved by Commissioner Downs , seconded by Commissioner Whitlock, adopting the findings as presented by staff. Carried 4-0. Moved by Commissioner- Downs, seconded by Commissioner Whitlock, adopting Planning Commission Resolution No, 1193, approving PP/CLIP 86-47 subject to conditions as amended. Carried 4-1). IX. MISCELLANEOUS A. Presentation to Planning Commission Chairman Buford Crites. Chairman Erwood presented to former Planning Commission Chairman Buford Crites a resolution to commend him for his service on the planning commission. Mr . Diaz also presented Mr. Crites with a certificate from staff. Mr. Crites thanked the commission and Mr. Diaz and indicated that it had been a pleasure working with each member of the commission. X. COMMENTS A. Commissioner Downs stated that there was a wholesale supply business in operation that has built two buildings illegally in the past and is now planning to expand on the block where Keedy's restaurant was located. He strenuously objected to this type of use on Highway III or El Paseo. He felt that Ordinance Section 25.28.030 should be _amended by the deletion of Section B. He felt that with all the work that the city has done to improve this area, wholesale types of business would defeat that purpose. 4 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION NOVEMBER 18, 1986 Chairman Crites opened the pubiic testimony and asked if the applicant wished to address the commis ion. MR. RICHARD OLIPHANT, 77-900 Avenue of the states, stated that he had no problem; with the staff report . Chairman Crites asked if anyone present wisher to speak in FAVOR or OPPOSITION to the proposed. There being no one, the public testimony was closed. Action: Moved by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner Whitlock, adopting the findings as presented by staff. Carried 4-0. Moved by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner Whitlock, adopting Pl,gnning Commission Resolution No. 1191 , approving PP 8F-45, subject to conditions. Carried 4-0. C. Continued Case No. PP 86-47 - HARRY SCHMITZ, Applicant Request for approval of a negative declaration of environmental impact, precise plan of design and conditional use permit to allow construction of a seven unit senior citizen apartment project located on Santa Rosa Way, east of San Pascual Avenue. Ms. Sass stated that a continuance was being requested to review the plans with the concurrence of the applicant. Chairman Crites opened the public testimony and asked if anyone present wished to speak in FAVOR or OPPOSITION to the proposed. There was no one. Action: Moved by Commissioner Erwood, seconded by Commissioner Whitlock, approving a two-week continuance to December 2, 1986. Carried 4-0. D. Case Nos. CUP 86-5 and VAR 86-4 Amendment - RICHARD AND MAY LEE, Applicants Request for approval of a conditional use permit and associated variance to allow the conversion of four existing standard rental units to eight 3 HOUSLEI' ASSOCIATES, INC. DATE: — Z,/lzo�*144� 74-091 Larrea Street Palm Desert, CA 92260 RE: TO (L� A, �ZV ATIRI: The following described documents are attached Q being shipped separately via for your use-. Q for approval Q as requested Q for bids due 19� for review and comrent Q for DATE COIFS DESCRIPTION Comments: Very truly yours, cc: er - Ci Engineers - Surveyors 619) 340-4569 NN .A --i YO'FOR MEN - VARIES 11�� 62-0 30'FOR WOMF_N 3-O"DI4 M. CIRCLEBOYS UNDER 16 STAKE I"DAMI O" HIGHI"DIAM.STAKE H OX ` ALLOW10S2, UL O=eO COURTSNQU-- 13 -HORSESHOES TS BOCCE (BOCCIE) 32]O O ePA 99'O" IE'O aO �In -- —^ NO DEFINITE BOUNDARIES .� ' mm ' " ' bLNE 6• 2-a OR DIMENSION20-SRADp 6.mO 6 0 '-lV ' • D BASEO O"RAD.RAD GIRLS NET 2' 6" N 1E f 0 AT CENTER I NET 2'-2" / RAAD STANDARD TIP 1 J JU 4T CENTER ——_—t J m I BOYS SENIOR COURT IOFciCAL RLAY) JUNIOR COURT 60-0 PADDLE TENNIS BUN TIME I••.32 HOPSCOTCH TEAM DODGE BALL "•I6 NO SCALE Explanation of map. LATITUDES: Ch, 0 TIME SWEEPING at 1200. 4T CENT•ER _— 40 NOTE: 4O I mJ QB20'- DIA SCORE OR B`TTON q NOS Tieme Eastern tlfP{tSublractl 14 O NET 9'- _r DOUBLE COURT MAY BE 0 i y-p. MARKED FOR SINGLES ALSO Q _ N 0„ 'MIN, b U of longitude d site is wes�l /SPACE O I �—---a--0---a--O lV R HOG LINE III sue is east o1 it 31 Colj REQUIRED N I 'O I— NET Q CENTER LINE fnllam: DOUBLES OUBLE60 IfiINOLE6 COURT O HOUSE n'p. 0 m 0 0 n'O'• -i I I I FRONT JAN 21 -11 4 AP t I (= N 6'-O' 2' O" ]2'_p•• RINGS FEB 21 -13.d MA — COURT MAR 21 - 74 JUt DECK TENNIS =32' EXAMPLE: Calculate CURLING h I"•ea' June 21 st. STEP 1. As in June,Day _ 7 0., 11:00 o clink. TABLES 2'-6"HIGH r NET a" HIGH STEP 2. Locate Col umfir ADJACENT I HEADROOM ]'-O" I 0-6 TABLES IN 5 0. ish the ceuva 3._D•. _-, STEP longitude. l: subs I'-6 10._p. ADJACENT SEPARATION 6'-6" - B'"p,. Oi TABLES r 0:280 / TRI4NGLE +� D NET r O � `L____L 3. To correct lI,,, 1 ,I 10 houm, 26 m r o " m —LEAD a in I -J NET local tune. m 0 LINES m O Pk Q OA-- Q J SHADOW CON6T RU( N 17Sq._6. N O 3 -J "v}— ° 3 Required informauon: al L� _ _ • N __< J - 9'-D' 0 O IL Bi and altitude angle f(.. —__— __ — —BnSE LINE -- AMERICAN SHUFFLEBOARD REGULATION TABLE __m J STEP 1. Ley out brit Oiug SMALL TABLE I'•16' 0 TABLE TENNIS STEP 2. Lay out altimdu ry I"•6' the intersection t NOTE'. hi us information is for preliminary .planning an0 tleslyn on ayouts end design investigate current rules and ly. Far final l regulations of the athletic organisation or other authority whose stdntlartls w yovern, tion plane IbCOm [ian plane. Com Charles F.U.Egbert,AIA;Architect,Washington,D.C. construct sun elev I�fYY�n1G GIsuKT 39/ k 6 r Victor Olgyay,AIA;Associxt ti Movable Equipment for Sports and Games 491 6=;RING I'-6"DIA, _ II"TO III " rrPCULAR j� BALL:BI�/pl"TO BALL: B24'py"TO ' O pIMEN510N5 SIM- B2%j'OIA. 9a "OIA. ILAR TO a2 FOOTBALL NET I !'-O"w1DEVOLLEY BALL SOCCER BI BPEEDBALL FOOTBALL RUOBv BALL DIMENSIONS 924e'DIAi BALL NET 6" STANDARD BALLI"MAX. Ba0"DIA.MAX. �I BASKETBALL DISC C T' DUCK BALL 5"OIA.MAX. ♦I o a ST111- r CUE.S'-S" Max. QUOIT PIN PIN QUOIT STAKE SHUFFLEBOARD 14._D.. IB._D�. jl/2.. I,_312e BOWLING MAX. W RN W 1 n W W ry W W X �� X �� HORSESHOE N 1 NN R N 1 HORSESHOE S S"OEESH STAKE QUOIT xa OI _ ... 31' t2836 32' HORSESHOE S OUOIT PITCHING - _ 42'_ 44'52' 53' B" _S_ 5� 64' 6 - — - - - - 3' 73 75BBALL RACK B BALL J84- 85' RACK BALL 2'H"TO 2�/e' DIAMETER RIFLE DI STANDARD TARGET'.SPRING BIB CATAPULT OR TRAP 4b"DIA.. `51/2"` 3'-11/2^ R _ OZ SKEET 9 TRAP SHOOTING MARK FOIL CUE FENCING BILLIARDS 9 POOL CAPACITY AT 660. FT PER I PERSON 9 n c j. 5 23 PISTOL =g DIA. 7 O: 8 40 SHOOTING //jlYi/ 0 57 p � ry = 2 80 HOCKEY h ��� PUCK p F 4 110 BET OF B BALLS a 1 JACK 8 141 BALL : 41/2" DIAMETER O R 8 180 m JACK, 2" DIAMETER BALL: 41'11'le' TO 61/." DIA. Q 8 220 � V' - U BOCCE LAWN BOWLS 0 334 1'-2" I' -2" 2 432 STICKS 8 563 DART DART BOARD ICE HOCKEY �a I DARTS wnnnR __ L__ IRONS 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 PLANNING. COMMISSION MEETING NOTICE OF ACTION Date: November 19, 1986 Harry Schmitz P.O. Box 3992 Palm Desert, CA 92261 Re: PP 86-47 The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of November 18, 1986. CONTINUED TO DECEMBER 2. 1986, CARRIED 4-0. Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Community Development, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen ( 15) days of the date of the decision. 0 RAMON A. DIAZ, SECR TA PALM DESERT PLANNING C MISSION RAD/tm 1: 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NOTICE OF ACTION Date: November 6, 1986 Harry Schmitz P.O. Box 3992 Palm Desert, CA 92261 Re: PP 86-47 The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of November 4, 1986. CONTINUED TO NOVEMBER 18, 1986. CARRIED 5-0. Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Community Development, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen ( 15) days of the date of the decision. RAMON A. DIAZ, SECRETA PALM DESERT PLANNING CCJI'IMISSION RAD/tm MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION NOVEMBER 4, 1986 subject to conditions, and recommending approval of DA 86-8 to the city council . Carried 5-0. Commissioner Richards stated that he would like an amendment added to inform council that: the fee structure involved here is pertaining to city fees. Chairman Crites stated that a minute motion could be placed relating to Resolution No. 1188. Action: Moved by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner Downs, recommending by minute motion that city council review the total fee structure that the city is now imposing upon any development in the zones that the city has required fees for density bonuses as to the impact on the total project. Carried 4-1 (Chairman Crites voting no) . E. Case No. PP 86-46 - RICHARD OLIPHANT 8 ASSOCIATES, Applicant Request for approval of a four unit apartment project on the west side of the southerly terminus of Lantana Avenue. Mr. Diaz recommended a continuance. Chairman Crites opened the public testimony and asked if anyone present wished to speak in FAVOR or OPPOSITION to the proposed. There was no one. Action: Moved by Commissioner Downs , seconded by Commissioner Whitlock, continuing PP 86-46 to November 18, 1986. Carried 5-0. F. Case No..PPS HARRY SCHMITZ, Applicant Request for approval of a negative declaration of environmental impact, precise plan of design and conditional use permit to allow construction of a seven unit senior citizen apartment project located on Santa Rosa Way, east of San Pascual Avenue. Mr. Diaz recommended a two-week continuance. 6 tiy] ti MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION NOVEMBER 4, 1986 Chairman Crites opened the public testimnny and asked if anyone present wished to speak in FAVOR or OPPOSITION to the proposed. There was no one. Action: Moved by Commissioner Downs, seconded by Commissioner Richards, continuing PP 86-47 to November 18, 1986. Carried 5-0. B. Case No. PM 22042 - ZTM/FLYING BUTTRESS, Applicants Request for subdivision of an existing 12,840 square foot lot into two lots having a minimum lot area of 6420 square feet in the R-1 zone at the southwest corner of El Cortez Way and Santa Ynez Avenue. Mr. Smith explained that this matter was before the commission in September and was in accordance with the variance that was granted at that time. Chairman Crites opened the public testimony and asked if the applicant wished to address the commission. MR. VICTOR VILLENEUVE, representing the applicant, concurred with the staff report. Chairman Crites asked if anyone present wished to speak. in FAVOR or OPPOSITION to the proposed. There was no one and Chairman Crites closed the public testimony. Action: Moved by Commissioner Downs, seconded by Commissioner Erwood, adopting the findings as presented by staff. Carried 5-0. Moved by Commissioner Downs , seconded by Commissioner Erwood, adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 1189, approving PM 22042, subject to conditions. Carried 5-0. C. Case No. PP 86-44 and C/Z 86-7 - DR. G. ROBERT ROGERS, Applicant Request for approval of a precise plan of design and zone change from R-I S.P. to PR-2 S.P. to allow construction of a residential project consisting of one single family residence, one 7 INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM City of Palm Desert TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: CATHERINE SASS, ASSISTANT PLANNER DATE: DECEMBER 2, 1986 SUBJECT: HARRY SCHMITZ, PP/CUP 86-47 I. BACKGROUND The applicant has submitted a redesign of previously submitted site plans per staff request. The applicant has addressed architectural commission concerns that the dead space north of units four and five should be made into a recreational area such as shuffleboard. Staff has discussed three alternative site plans for the parcel with the applicant. All three plans are feasible. Staff has determined that regardless of building placement, one-story units built at the allowed density leave a fixed amount of open space. The location of the open space in this project is more a matter of personal choice than utility and will therefore be left to the developer. The submitted plan provides approximately 346 square feet per unit of usable open space. The two story site plan alternative creates open space beyond requirement with great flexibility of design at a higher development cost. II . ANALYSIS A. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL OF A PRECISE PLAN: 1. The design of the precise plan will not substantially depreciate property values nor be materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. Justification: The design, of the project is acceptable, has architectural preliminary approval , and meets applicable code requirements for this type of facility. 2. The precise plan will not unreasonable interfere with the use of and enjoyment of property in the vicinity by the occupants thereof for lawful purposes. PLANNING COMMISSION PP/CUP 86-47 DECEMBER 2, 1986 Justification: The surrounding zoning is for the same use as proposed and adjacent owners would not be deprived the use of their land or be negatively impacted by this development. 3. The precise plan will not endanger the public peace, health, safety, or general welfare. Justification: The project is designed in a manner that wi l l not endanger the public peace, health, safety, or general welfare due to compliance with code requirements and compatibility with surrounding properties. B. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT: 1 . The proposed location of the conditional use is in accord with the objectives of the zoning ordinance and the purpose of the district in which the site is located. 2. The proposed location of the conditional use and the conditions under which it will be operated and maintained will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare, or be materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. The proposed conditional use will comply with each of the applicable provisionsLof this title, except for approved variances or adjustments. 4. The proposed conditional use complies with the goals, objectives, and policies of the city's adopted general plan. III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The director of community development has determined that the proposed project will not have an adverse impact on the environment and a negative declaration of environmental impact has been prepared. IV. RECOMMENDATION The plan before the commission meets all requirements. Al staff's concerns have been addressed. Staff finds the plan acceptable with the attached conditions and therefore recommends: 2 PLANNING COMMISSION PP/CUP 86-47 DECEMBER 2, 1986 A. Adoption of the findings; B. Adoption of Planning Commission Resolution No. approving PP/CUP 86-47. V. ATTACHMENTS A. Draft resolution. B. Negative declaration. C. Interoffice memo dated November 18, 1986. D. Staff report dated November 4, 1986. E. Legal notice. F. Revised site plan. C 5"xU-0 CATHERINE SASS, ASSISTANT PLANNER CS/tm 3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PRECISE PLAN OF DESIGN TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A SEVEN UNIT SENIOR CITIZEN APARTMENT PROJECT LOCATED ON SANTA ROSA WAY, EAST OF SAN PASCUAL AVENUE. CASE NO. PP/CUP 86-47 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 2nd day of December, 1986, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider the request of HARRY SCHMITZ for the above mentioned project; and WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedure for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 80-89, " in that the director of community development has determined that the project will not have a significant impact on the environment and a negative declaration has been prepared; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said planning commission did find the following facts and reasons to exist to justify granting approval of said precise plan and conditional use permit: I . The design of the precise plan will not substantially depreciate property values in the vicinity. 2. The precise plan will not unreasonably interfere with the use or enjoyment of property in the vicinity by the occupants thereof for lawful purposes. 3. The precise plan will not endanger the public peace, health, safety or general welfare. 4. The proposed location of the conditional use is in accord with the objectives of the zoning ordinance and the purpose of the district in which the site is located. 5. The proposed location of the conditional use and the conditions under which it will be operated and maintained will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare, or be materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 6. The proposed conditional use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of this title, except for approved variances or adjustments. 7. The proposed conditional use complies with the goals, objectives, and policies of the city's adopted general plan. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: I . That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the commission in this case; 2. That approval of Precise Plan/Conditional Use Permit 86-47 is hereby granted for reasons subject to the attached conditions. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 2nd day of December, 1986, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: BUFORD CRITES, Chairman ATTEST: RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary /tm 2 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO. PP/CUP 86-47 Department of Community Development: 1 . The development of the property shall conform substantially with exhibits on file with the department of community development/planning, as modified by the following conditions. 2. Construction of a portion of said project shall commence within one year from the date of final approval unless an extension of time is granted; otherwise said approval shall become null , void and of no effect whatsoever. 3. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein which are in addition to all municipal ordinances and state and federal statutes now in force, or which hereafter may be in force. 4. Prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contemplated by this approval , the applicant shall first obtain permits and/or clearance from the following agencies: Coachella Valley Water District Palm Desert Architectural Commission City Fire Marshal Public Works Department Palm Desert Water & Services District Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to the department of building and safety at the time of issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. 5. Trash provisions shall be approved by applicable trash company and city prior to issuance of building permit. 6. A deed restriction shall be added to the property limiting occupants to a minimum age of 62 years. The city shall have the ability to audit the property owners rental records at any time to insure compliance. 7. Applicant shall provide a minimum of three covered parking spaces. 8. Project shall pay school fees as determined by Desert Sands Unified School District. 3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 9. The apartments shall be equipped with solid core entry/exit doors with 190 degree door viewers, dead-bolt locks and locking devices on all windows and sliding doors to provide security for the residents. 10. All project landscaping shall be provided to the approval of staff, with plant materials approved and placed per the architectural review board and number of table/benches, etc. per submitted plan. 11 . Perimeter walls shall be six foot block or as determined by staff. Department of Public Works: 1 . Drainage and signalization fund fees, as required by city ordinance, shall be paid prior to grading permit issuance. 2. Full public improvements, including traffic safety lighting as required by ordinance and the director of public works, shall be installed in accordance with city standards. 3. Improvement plans for water and sewer systems shall be approved by the respective service districts with "as-built" plans submitted to the department of public works prior to the project final . 4. Complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the director of public works for checking and approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. The engineer shall submit "as-built" plans prior to the acceptance of the improvements by the city. 5. All private driveways and parking lots shall be inspected by the engineering department and a standard inspection fee shall be paid prior to grading permit issuance. 6. Landscaping maintenance on Santa Rosa Way shall be provided by the property owner. 7. Complete grading plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the director of public works for checking and approval prior to issuance of any permits. 8. Dedication of five feet of right-of-way on Santa Rosa Way shall be done prior to issuance of any permits and approval of plans. 9. Installation of curb and gutter, matching paving and six foot sidewalk on Santa Rosa Way. 4 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 10. Offsite improvement plans to be approved by public works department and a surety posted to guarantee the required offsite improvements prior to grading permit issuance. 11 . Installation of sewers to serve this project. 12. Size, number and location of driveways to public works specifications with only one driveway approach to be allowed to serve this property. 13. Any and all off-site improvements shall be preceded by the approval of plans and the issuance of valid encroachment permit(s) by the department of public works. 14. A complete preliminary soils investigation, conducted by a registered soils engineer, shall be submitted to and approved by the department of public works prior to issuance of the grading permit. 15. Site drainage shall be from the rear of the lot to the street, notwithstanding the proposed landscaping and site development scheme. 5 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 Pursuant to Title 14, Division 6, Article 7, Section 15083, of the California Administrative Code. NEGATIVE DECLARATION CASE NO: PP/CUP 86-47 APPLICANT/PROJECT SPONSOR: HARRY SCHMITZ P.O. Box 3992 Palm Desert, CA 92260 PROJECT DESCRIPTION/LOCATION: Santa Rosa Way between San Pascual and Portola Avenue. The Director of the Department of Community Development, City of Palm Desert, California, has found that the described project will not have a significant effect on the environment. A copy of the Initial Study has been attached to document the reasons in support of this finding. Mitigation measures, if any, included in the project to avoid potentially significant effects, may also be found attached. ---------------------------------------- RAMON A. DIAZ DATE DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT /tm INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM City of Palm Desert TO, PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: CATHERINE SASS, ASSISTANT PLANNER DATE: NOVEMBER 18, 1986 SUBJECT: HARRY SCHMITZ, PP/CUP 86-47 The applicant has submitted a redesign of the previously submitted site plan, .continued from Planning Commission meeting November 4, 1986. The original staff report recommended denial based on the lack of common, usable open space and intensity of use. The applicant has sought mitigation through the following design changes: 1 . Removal of one parking space. 2. Widening the north end of the walkway including additional plantings and a table. 3. Dividing a landscape median into two areas. 4. Moving the laundry facility near the carports to include a covered patio and picnic table. 5. Removal of the maintenance room. 6. Additional landscaping along the parking area. 7. Removal of the easterly chain link fence, replaced with a block wall . B. Providing a bench at the mailbox site. The applicant received preliminary architectural approval by 2-1-I vote, with Commissioner Martin unavailable for vote. Commissioner Martin felt that a redesign placing three units across the back (north) would provide more usable open space in the front and did not favor the presented site design. Staff finds that alternative site design that congregates the open space to one area should be investigated. Staff further notes that although the applicant removed one parking space the additional space gained would only be four feet maximum, since the measurement for a handicap stall was not provided for. Staff recommends this case be continued pending review of alternative building placement. CATHERINE SASS ASSISTANT PLANNER CS/tm 4 CITY OF PALM DESERT DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT TOs PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: NOVEMBER 4, 1986 CASE .NO: PP/CUP 86-47 REQUEST: Approval of a negative declaration of environmental Impact, precise plan of design and conditional use permit to allow construction of a seven unit senior citizen apartment project located on Santa Rosa Way, east of San Pascual Avenue. APPLICANT: HARRY H. SCHMITZ P.O. Box 3992 Palm Desert, CA 92261 I. BACKGROUND: A. DESCRIPTION OF SITE: The property Is vacant, approximately 13,000 square feet, relatively level and gently sloping to the north. B. ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE: NORTH: R-3, S.O./Vacant SOUTH: R-2, S.O./Multi-family housing EAST: R-3, S.O./Six-plex WEST: R-3, S.O./Single family residence C. GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION: Medium density residential . 11. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A. CODE PROVISIONS IN CHART FORM: Code Requirement Provided unit size 450 sq. ft. 600 sq. ft. density for 600 sq. ft. units on 13,000 sq. ft. lot 6 7 people per acre/13,000 sq. ft. 10 12.25 parking 7 spaces 8 spaces height 24 ft. 12 ft. setback 10/20/20 10/22/20 STAFF REPORT PP/CUP Bb-47 NOVEMBER 4, 1986 Code Requirement Provided open space per d.u. 300 sq. ft. 92 sq. ft. building coverage 50% max. 33% The senior overlay density is based on unit size. The applicant has provided studio apartments at the one bedroom square footage. A generous calculation on this site would only allow six units, at 10 P/A. The required open space is defined as group usable/common open space, Intended to be landscaped and/or recreational . As presented, over 50% of the site is in paving or other hard surface and only 625 square feet could be considered landscaped or recreational . B. SITE DESIGN, PARKING AND ACCESS: The proposed design Is for seven 600 square foot studio apartments located In two rows facing each other. Parking spaces, including four carport spaces, are provided directly off the street taking the southern third of the site. A perimeter block wall six feet In height will surround the building area. The common area is wheel chair accessible. C. ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPING: The architecture and landscaping meet minimum requirements with the exception of open space. The applicant shows a chain link fence in the front yard which will have to be replaced with block wall , wrought Iron, or other acceptable material . Ili . DISCUSSION: Staff finds the studio design of the units attractive. The building placement and common area appear crowded and the open space appears unusable. The design review board felt deleting one unit would provide additional open space and landscaping. Staff is concerned with crowded, poorly designed common areas encouraging shut-ins among senior residents. Further conflict exists where backing space Interferes with planter areas. The deletion of the one space over requirement would provide additional space for backing. 2 STAFF REPORT .PP/CUP 86-47 NDVEMBER 4, 1986 The architectural review committee directed the applicant In favor of the above improvements. The applicant has chosen to continue presentation to the planning commission without any redesign. IV. ANALYSIS: Staff finds that the proposed project, without suggested mitigation measures, does not reflect the unique requirements of senior citizens nor does the overall quality of design reflect the intent of the senior housing overlay. Staff feels they would be doing a disservice recommending approval of studio apartments that provide no outside amenity, gathering place, or common recreational areas for our city's senior citizens. V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends denial of the application based on the above. A. Adopt the findings. B. Adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. denying PP/CUP 86-47. V1 . ATTACHMENTS: A. Draft resolution. B. Legal notice. C. Exhibits and supporting data. Prepared by Reviewed and Approved by /tm 3 PLANN0G COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, DENYING A PRECISE PLAN OF DESIGN FOR A SEVEN UNIT SENIOR CITIZEN APARTMENT PROJECT LOCATED ON SANTA ROSA WAY, EAST OF SAN PASCUAL AVENUE. CASE NO. PP/CUP 86-47 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 4th day of November, 1986, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider the request of HARRY SCHMITZ for denial of a negative declaration of environmental impact, precise plan of design and conditional use permit to allow the construction of the above described project on a lot on Santa Rosa Way, more particularly described as: APN 627-121-020 WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all Interested persons desiring to be heard, said planning commission did find the following facts and reasons to exist to justify denial of said precise plan and conditional use permit: 1 . Open space Is Insufficient. 2. Density and Intensity is too high. NOW, THEREFORE, BE iT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1 . That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the commission In this case; 2. That approval of Precise Plan/Conditional Use Permit 86-47 are hereby denied. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 4th day of November, 1986, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: BUFORD CRITES, Chairman ATTEST: RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary /tm 73.SIU FRED WARINO DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92280 I 4 - TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 October 21, 1985 CITY OF PALM DESERT - 'LEGAL NOTICE CASE NO, PP/CUP 86-47 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by HARRY SCHMITZ for approval of a precise plan/condltlonei use permit For a seven unit senior citizen apartment project located on Santa Rose Nay, east of San Pascual Avenue, also known as: APN 627-121-020 ----------------------44" n.e♦a,r � I � I en [ a Iran 'u '• ' u A. ,a Jr J♦ w � i t ♦ A,,n, �11 . s • �RI,f ~ (� l ni e,c,en Srx.>'t}. nrA o♦.m♦ ® ® ® © �euh, .01'` n ( . {t n �I» Je •Jr J, n v .e .i J r a • � Ar u li a w J1 6,:.,:,.... . �-T � .. r .nil.. —R054--- 7„T= • ..r 1. WAY , U 0 •+ i11•I� Ni' j ('� Y -O• Y- ; J Va.. olNu 0.11h♦ 09M• I�' �. • Cry �M r � � J n ' Aft, FV/J/ PoA,q N'uopr Grew• 1 _ S - meP1136.srPoA Y'r,'6eide Roy K9 77/5/ Alp.,A r e♦/ A!6 31/57•S3 Km ,& Smd, R.S/9//9 ' A:=a,.r AAA°6e m n.a .,,pavo, mmrr, C+/6 SAID public hearing will be held on Tuesday, November 4, 1986, at 700 p.m. In the Council Chamber at the Palm Desert Civic Center, 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all Interested persons are Invited to attend and be heard. If you challenge the proposed actions In court, you may be limited to raising only those Issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described In this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the planning commission for city council) at, or prior to, the public hearing. PUBLISHe Palm Desert Post RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary October 24, 1986 Palm Desert Planning Commission J INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM City of Palm Desert TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: CATHERINE SASS, ASSISTANT PLANNER DATE: NOVEMBER 18, 1986 SUBJECT: HARRY SCHMITZ, PP/CUP 86-47 The applicant has submitted a redesign of the previously submitted site plan, continued from Planning Commission meeting November 4, 1986. The original staff report recommended denial based on the lack of common, usable open space and intensity of use. The applicant has sought mitigation through the following design changes: 1 . Removal of one parking space. 2. Widening the north end of the walkway including additional plantings and a table. 3. Dividing a landscape median into two areas. 4. Moving the laundry facility near the carports to include a covered patio and picnic table. 5. Removal of the maintenance room. 6. Additional landscaping along the parking area. 7. Removal of the easterly chain link fence, replaced with a block wall . 8. Providing a bench at the mailbox site. The applicant received preliminary architectural approval by 2-1-1 vote, with Commissioner Martin unavailable for vote. Commissioner Martin felt that a redesign placing three units across the back (north) would provide more usable open space in the front and did not favor the presented site design. Staff finds that alternative site design that congregates the open space to one area should be investigated. Staff further notes that although the applicant removed one parking space the additional space gained would only be four feet maximum, since the measurement for a handicap stall was not provided for. Staff recommends this case be continued pending review of alternative building placement. CATHERINE SASS ASSISTANT PLANNER CS/tm MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION ■ SUQfEToo R CT TO NOVEMBER 12. 1986 FV/$/QN APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): WITOLD MULLER, 10410 Lower Azusa Road, E1 Monte, CA 91731 ; JIM FEIRO, 73-955 Highway 111, Palm Desert, CA 92260. MATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of landscape plan for three triplexes. LOCATION: South side Fred Waring Drive between San Pasqual and San Pablo. ZONE: R-2 2. CASE NO: 317 MF APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): HARRY SCHMITZ, P.O. Box 3992, Palm Desert, CA 92260. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of seven unit senior apartment project. LOCATION: Santa Rosa Way between San Pascual and Portola Avenue. ZONE: R-3 S.O. Ms. Sass explained that the applicant had requested to be reviewed by planning commission prior to review by architectural commission after the architectural commission had expressed concern over the site plan. She noted the changes that had been made which included addition of a few feet of landscape area at the rear of the project, deletion of one parking space to add landscaping and addition of a bench, table and picnic bench. She stated that the usable open space required by code had not been provided. Mr. Diaz indicated that we seem to be getting the wrong type of developments on the wrong sites with the 50 zoning. He explained that the minimum unit size for a studio is 450 square feet. The applicant is providing 600 square foot units which is the minimum size for a one bedroom unit. He suggested that the front unit be placed at the rear of the site and the size of the three rear units be reduced. This would allow for additional usable open space at the front of the site. He noted that the SO zone was not created to provide crowded sites. He advised that the applicant could ask for a variance on the side yard setbacks which would provide additional open space. Chairman Gregory was opposed to less than 10 foot setbacks. 3 MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION NOVEMBER 12, 1986 Commissioner Drury was concerned that the units wou 1 d be too sma 1 I for active seniors. Ms. Sass indicated that One Quail Place has units that are approxi- mately the same size as what is proposed for this project. Commissioner Martin agreed that the front unit should be moved to the rear of the site to provide additional usable open space. Commissioner Cook felt that the open space provided was enough for the seven residents that would be living there. Mr. Schmitz indicated that the project has been developed under the R-3 standards. He noted that he is allowed to go two story but chose not to. Ms. Sass explained that under the R-3 standards this site would have only been allowed five units rather than seven. She recommended that the applicant go to two story which would easily handle the seven units and provide more than adequate usable open space. Commissioner Drury had no problem with the plans as drawn. She questioned what other type of amenities seniors would need. Mr. Diaz noted that they could use a small pool , horse shoe or shuffle board area. Commissioner Cook indicated a shuffle board area could be provided at the rear of the site. Commissioner McCrea felt that several small open space areas would not be as valuable as one large open space area. He agreed with the recommendation of having three units along the rear of the site and having one large open space area at the front of the site. Commissioner Cook was concerned with other senior projects that have less open space area than is proposed here. Chairman Gregory suggested the applicant present drawings by the next meeting showing the three units along the rear of the site. He noted that there may have to be some changes made to the plan because the applicant is asking for the maximum on this site. It was moved by Commissioner Drury, seconded by Chairman Gregory to grant preliminary approval subject to the rear area at units 4 & 5 be used as additional open space recreation area. Carried 2-1-1 (Commissioner McCrea opposed, Commissioner Cook abstaining - Commissioner Martin left before the vote) . 4 C�$tbTr off 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 October .20, 1986 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW .COMMISSION ACTION CASE NO: 317 MF APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) : HARRY H. SCHMITZ, P.O. Box 3992, Palm Desert, CA 92261 . NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Seven unit senior apartment project. LOCATION: Santa Rosa Way between San Pascual and Portola Avenue. ZONE: R-3 S.O. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Upon reviewing the submitted plans and presentations by staff and by the applicant, the architectural commission continued this case. Date of Action: October 14, 1986 Vote: Carried 4-0 (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen ( 15) days of the date of the decision. ) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ STAFF COMMENTS: Please read the attached minutes. MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION OCTOBER 14, 1986 She was also concerned with the Mobil Mart being located near a restaurant. Mr. Flood . explained that they were trying to provide adequate circulation by keeping the structures small . He noted that the restaurant,and Mobil Mart had no relation to each other.. Commissioner McCrea withdrew his previous motion. Commissioner .Martin explained that if the .,applicant wished to go ahead with the original industrial type of design he would be willing to approve that. It was moved by Commissioner Martin, seconded by Chairman Gregory to grant preliminary approval to the original proposal and site plan subject to the following conditions. 1 . Canopy to have texturized surface. 2. Stucco on buildings to be a muted off-white color. 3. Provide meandering sidewalk around perimeter of site. Carried 2- 1- 1 (Commissioner Drury opposed, Commissioner McCrea abstained) . 2. CASE NO: 317 MF APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) : HARRY H. SCHMITZ, P.O. Box 3992, Palm Desert, CA 92261 . NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Seven unit senior apartment project. LOCATION: Santa Rosa Way between San Pascual and Portola Avenue. ZONE: R-3 5.0. Ms. Sass explained that the proposal was for a seven unit senior apartment complex. Chairman Gregory felt the site was crowded and suggested deleting one unit to provide additional open space and landscaping. Commissioner Martin noted that one parking space could also be deleted. 8 MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION OCTOBER 14, 1986 Mr. Diaz felt the design of the site would encourage shut-ins among the senior residents and questioned the amount of usable open space. Mr. Schmitz explained that the required open space Is provided which he has .tried to locate in one centralized area. Mr. Diaz stated that the :standards may need to be increased because of people crowding sites. Chairman Gregory explained that if the applicant disagreed with the commissions decision then he should appeal to city council . Me noted that even though the project meets code this does not mean that the commission has to approve it if it Is not acceptable to them. He felt the site was too crowded. Commissioner Drury expressed concern over the parking backing into a planter area. She suggested deleting one parking space to provide additional space for backing. It was moved by Chairman Gregory, seconded by Commissioner Martin to continue this case pending planning commission review of the site plan. Carried 4-0 3. CASE NO: SAT ANT 3 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) : SUNRISE ELECTRONICS, 73-540 Highway 111 , Palm Desert, CA 92260. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of satellite antenna. LOCATION: North side of Highway Ill east of San Pablo. ZONE: C-I S.P. Mr. Smith explained that the applicant had previously requested approval of a pole mounted satellite antenna which would face south. Commission denied the request due to the visibility. He noted that the rear of the building is now blocked by a newly constructed building and other satellites of this type have been approved. Commission informed the applicant he would be required to provide the appropriate engineering information for wind load. It was moved by Commissioner McCrea, seconded by Commissioner Martin to approve the satellite antenna as submitted. Carried 4-0 9 CITY OF PALM DESERT DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT TO: PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: NOVEMBER 4, 1986 CASE NO: PP/CUP 86-47 .REQUEST: Approval of a negative declaration of senvironmental impact, precise plan of design ,and conditional use permit to allow construction of a seven unit senior citizen apartment project located on Santa Rosa Way, east of San Pascual Avenue. APPLICANT: ' HARRY H. SCHMITZ P.O. Box' 3992 Palm Desert, CA 92261 1. BACKGROUND: i r A. DESCRIPTION OF SITE: 'i+ The property Is vacant, approximately 13,000 square feet, relatively level and gently sloping to the north. B. ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE: NORTH: R-3, S.O./Vacant SOUTH: R-2, S.O./Multi-family housing EAST: '• R-3, S.O./Six-plex WEST: R-3, S.O./Single family residence . C. GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION: Medium density residential . 11. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A. CODE PROVISIONS IN CHART FORM: Code Requirement Provided unit size 450 sq. ft. 600 sq.. ft. density for 600 sq. ft. units on 13,000 sq. ft. lot 6 7 people per acre/13,000 sq. ft. 10 12.25 parking 7 spaces 8 spaces height 24 ft. 12 ft. setback 10/20/20 10/22/20 STAFF REPORT PP/CUP 86-47 NOVEMBER 4, 1986 Code Requirement Provided open space per d.u. 300 sq. ft. 92 sq. ft. building coverage 50% max. 33% The senior overlay density is based on unit size. The applicant has provided studio •apartments at the one bedroom square footage. A 'generous ;calculation on thi.s site would only allow six units., at 10 The required -open space is defined as group usable/common open space, intended to be landscaped and/or recreational . As -presented, over 50% of the site is in paving or other hard surface and only 625 square feet could be considered landscaped or recreational . B. SITE DESIGN, PARKING AND ACCESS: The proposed design is for seven 600 square foot studio apartments located in two rows facing each other. Parking spaces, Including four carport spaces, are provided directly off the street taking the southern third of the site. A perimeter block wall six feet in l [ • height will surround the building area. The common area is wheel chair accessible. C. ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPING: The architecture and landscaping meet minimum requirements with the exception of open space. The applicant shows a chain link fence in the front yard which will have to be replaced with block wall , wrought iron, or other acceptable material . iII. DISCUSSION: Staff finds the studio design of the units attractive. The building placement and common area appear crowded and the open space appears unusable. The design review board felt deleting one unit would provide additional open space and landscaping. Staff is concerned with crowded, poorly designed common areas encouraging shut-ins among senior residents. Further conflict exists where backing space interferes with planter areas. The deletion of the one space over requirement would provide additional space for backing. - ' 2 STAFF REPORT PP/CUP 86-47 NOVEMBER 4, 1986 The architectural review committee directed the applicant in favor of the above improvements. The applicant has chosen to continue presentation to the planning commission without any redesign. IV. ,ANALYSIS: . Staff finds that the proposed project, without suggested mitigation .measures, does not reflect the unique requirements of senior citizens nor does the overall quality of design reflect the intent of the senior housing overlay. Staff feels they would be doing a disservice recommending approval of studio apartments that provide no outside amenity, gathering place, or common recreational areas for our city's senior citizens. V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends denial of the application based on the above. A. Adopt the findings. B. Adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. denying PP/CUP 86-47. VI. ATTACHMENTS: A.. Draft resolution. B. Legal notice. C. Exhibits and supporting data. Prepared by Reviewed and Approved by /tm 3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, DENYING A PRECISE PLAN OF DESIGN FOR A SEVEN UNIT SENIOR CITIZEN APARTMENT PROJECT LOCATED ON SANTA ROSA WAY, EAST OF SAN PASCUAL AVENUE. CASE NO. PP/CUP 86-47 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 4th day of November, 1986, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider the request of HARRY SCHMITZ for denial of a negative declaration of environmental impact, precise plan of design and conditional use permit to allow the construction of the above described project on a lot on Santa Rosa Way, more. particularly described as: APN 627-121-020 WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to, be heard, said planning commission did find the following facts and reasons to exist to justify denial of said precise plan and conditional use permit: 1 . Open space is insufficient. 2. Density and intensity is too high. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1 . That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the commission in this case; 2. That approval of Precise Plan/Conditional Use Permit 86-47 are hereby denied. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 4th day of November, 1986, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES:' ABSENT: ABSTAIN: BUFORD CRITES, Chairman ATTEST: RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary /tm y 73-sio FRED WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346.0611 October 21, 1985 CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE CASE NO. 'PP/CUP 86-47 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by HARRY SCHMITZ for approval of a precise plan/condit tonal use permit for a seven 'unit senior citizen apartment protect located on Santa Rosa Way, east of San Pascual Avenue, also known as: ' APN 627-121-020 -• .r' r` v,ry ��.rrl , I, rv,n ". rr ,rr :` �.nLr r..T .' '- - rri,IY1r ♦ ' IO ' to a a arr " „ 8 a •• '$a aar•, rMA 7. JL a,ra r t ey a.,'i •a •. a if .a • • e •...3 R R 11Pw ' 11111A, , f ?a ! M1I iO ry i •ur• ea.., all.a •ira. MR AV91 Po:. Villear 6im,a• - ME2l/16-S1 PoM RRaa• Gard. 7hw /3 KE 22/1/ Alpi,n r,,,f Are 14/52C5 R.,eia Sall - RA/S//R , <SS_J'ORS/1I a 61..Gr P1/Y - R/VGS/O[ COLTTY, UUf 4. SAID public hearing will be held on Tuesday, November 4, 1986, at 7100 p.m. In the Council Chamber at the Palm Desert Civic Center, 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all Interested persons are Invited to attend and be heard. If you challenge the proposed actions In court, you may be limited to raising only those Issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described In this notice, or In written correspondence delivered to the planning commission. for city council) at, or prior to, the public hearing. - - PUBLISH: Palm Desert Post RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary October 24, 1986 Palm Desert Planning Commission CITY OF PALM DESERT INTEROFFICE MEMO cf44YN,. T 24 :4 oiPno,� . 1,986, TO: Catherine Sass 4ir"Hkiy FROM: 'Brent :Conley 'RE: 86-47 Seven Unit 'Senior Apt. Bldg. . DATE: October 23, . 1986 The...apa-rtments'. as proposed shoul-d--be--equipped-with_sol d-core entry/-exit-doors-with-T9_0-degree .doorviewers- deadb'olt_locks and locking-dev-'ces-on-all-windows—and-slading:door_s to_-pr.ov_ide security-for the residents The apartment plan could be enhanced by possibly moving the spa area to the center of the complex to allow easier occupant access. The area at .the front where the spa is proposed could be changed to include picnic tables and chairs to encourage residents to socialize. The main entrance will probably have the complex' s mail box and residents could use the common area to gather and sort mail . The lightling of the complex is very important to add to the feeling of security for the residents. A minimum standard of 1/2 FC for the interior of the complex and 1 FC for the parking area is esspntial . Brent Conley , Crime Prevention Officer BC/rrt ! I INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: :' � °' DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES FROM: DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS UCI Z 41986 _ II PP CU!nn'CNit'! U EGF'EIV OPE LIED E P�E?rSUBJECT = FLA^ G�_�� 6ii1 YeNi DATE: Gl✓ToBaa ` Zoe I 186 The foilowinig .shouid be .considered conditions of approval OI Drainage and signalization fund fees , as required by City ordinance , shall be paid prior .to snap (grad(Rg permit issuance) . 2) Drainage facilities shall be provided, per Ordinance No. 218 and the Master Drainage Plan, to the specifications of " the Director oflPublic� Works . 3 ) Storm Idrain construction shall be contingent upon a drainage studylby the private engineer that is approved by the Department of Public Works . O4 Fuil public Improvements , including traffic safety lighting, as required by ordinance and the Director of Public Works , shall be installed in accordance with City standards . OS Improvement plans for water and sewer systems shall be approved by the respective service districts with "as-built" plans) submitted to the Department of Public Works prior to the IroJect final . O6 Complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required by ordinance , to the Director of Public Works for checking and approval before construction of any improvements is commenced . The engineer shall submit "as-built" plans prior , to the acceptance of the A mprovements by the City. All ,-iprivate (4: .-e� (driveways and parking lots ) shall be inspected by the engineering department and a standard inspection fee shall be paid prior to C-4na1—•me-3.) (grading permit issuance) . (�8 Landscaping maintenance on (_Sv shall be provided by ' the (h_-eo,"e- ' s as at ` (property owner) .. I 9) Existing utilities on shall be undergrounded per each respective utility dis- tri�ct' s recommendation . If determined to be unfeasible applicant shall agree to participate to any future utility undergrounding district . I I I I 10 ) Traffic safety striping on shaillbe provided to the specifications of the Director of Public Works . A traffic control plan must be submitted to and approved by the Director of Public Works before placing pavement markings . 11 Compllte grading plans and specifications shall be submit- ted , as required by ordinance , to the Director of Public Workslfor checking and approval prior to issuance of any - permilts . Dedication of _feet of right-of-way on Santa ��d5;g _�dl s:halI be done prior to issuance of any - permits and .approval of plans . 00installation of curb and gutter , matching paving .and s% �rn� s i dewa 1 k on Sa,.,r .TL ra Wa. 14) Waivlr' of access to except at approved locations shall be granted on the final map. 15 ) Close' unused driveway with full height curb and gutter . li Offsite improvement plans to be approved by Public Works Department and a surety posted to guarantee the required offste improvements ` prior to ( 1 Ia-P) (grading permit issuance) . 17) fulllimprovement of interior streets based on ( 60 ' reslden- tiall) (private) ( industrial ) street standards as established In accordance with Chapter, 26, Section 26 . 40 . 040 ,. C.P .D . Code. 18) 1nstlallation of one-half landscaped median in or cash payment for one-half the cost' of landscaped median at the option of the Director of Public Works . 19) Traffic analysis to be prepared for the project to address theispecific impacts on existing networks ( street and Intersections ) and the proposed mit [gation measures recom- mended for approval, by the City. 20 ` Installation 'of sewers to serve this project . 0 Size , number and location of driveways to Public Works specifications with only 9h-(2� .driveway approach (sm) to be allowed to serve this property. 22) No I(new) requirements . (Original conditions apply) : 23 ) Grating permit issuance shall be subject to the waiver of ; , ;parlcel ,map first being approved and recorded . 24.) Complete (parcel ) (tract) map ( s ) shall be submitted as required by ordinance to the Director of Public Works for checking and approval and be recorded before Issuance of any permits . 25 Any andlall off-site improvements shall be preceded by the approvah of plans and the Issuance of valid :encroachment permit ( s ) by the Department of Public Works . 26 A compilete preliminary soils investigation , conducted by a registered soils engineer , shall be submitted to and approv- ed .'by the 'Department :of Public Works prior to issuance of the grading permit . 27 ) Appli.calnt shall secure rec ( pro.cal ingress and egress access easements from the owner ( s ) of lot( s) 28 s hp a 29 I Richard J . Folkers , P .E . RA/RJF Rev . 7/25/86 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 I TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 ; . Date DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING AND SAFETY PRELIMINARY REVIEW OF PLANS p THIS 15 NOT A PLAN CHECIK1 DEVELOPMENT: The comments below are based on the following assumptions and code groups: 1985 Uniform Building Code ` . 1985 Uniform Plumbing Code 1985 Uniform Mechanical Code 1984 NationallElectrical Code Title 24 Handicapp / Accessibility Standards Title 24 Energy Conservation Standards Title 24 Multi-Family Adaptability Standards Code Assumptions Building Classification l Type of Construction f l Sprinklered I. Allowable Floor Area: Basic Allowable Setbacks Sprinklered Multi-Story Factor Total Allowable Sq.Ft. CHECKLIST lklains shads be prepared by a licensed California architect. Show nt number on plans. t a Mist of features proposed that show compliance to the multi- y handicapp regulations. Use a maximum cap of $740.00 per adapt- able dwel I ling unit.. ' ' Page two... HANDICAPPED: Site requirementslper handicapp standards. PARKING: (1 ❑ Show number, of stalls required. VV ❑ Revise parking stall locations to al-low main entry access. \\ f❑-� Show international logo, loading and unloading zone requirements. Ramp from parking lot to sidewalk not shown on plans. BUILDING ACCESS: D Doors shaliI be minimum 32" clear in width. r 1 .... � ❑ Provide 1811 ,space on the swing side of doors.L On plans, show height of all bathroom accessories. Handicapplbathroom layout does not conform to current standards. ' (4 Before further comments can be made, additional plans and specifications are needed for review..' „ The following Plans must be submitted to the Department of Building & Safety for Ian review, Architectural Drawings. and Details. Structural Drawings and Calculations. Complete Electrical. Mechanical and Plumbing Plans and Specifications. Title 24IEnergy Conservation Documentation Forms. "COMMEZjtENTS: L�L�E�R , RINCIPAL PLAS XMINER ` RIVERSIDECOUNTY y1'tiEof t4turo��i e+r-. FIRE DEPARTMENT r-, -�---�' IN COOPERATION WITH THE -�- cOU'.Fiy NTY CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT.OF FORESTRY e , c . fit ERS1DE RAY HEBRA r RD To ,4,�M f FIRE CHIEF 0 WEST SAN JACINTO AVENUE October..1.8.•1p8 y' ' (J PERRIS,CALIFORNIA 92370 1, s \ � TELEPHONE:(714)657.3183 Ramon Diaz ACT 2 1 1986 Planning and Community Development Director p iECElGPpl:.ili G'r'`R n18�1 73510 Fred Waring °hi bN bell OF ?aLh1 CESE!L` Palm .Desert, CA 92260 { Reference: PP 86-47. :; . . .. , z .. Applicant: Harry Schmitz `Dear Mr.. Ramon Diaz i The following fire protection requirements are in accordance with the Uniform Fire Code and Life Safety Code standards. " - 1 . Install a water system capable .of delivering 2500GPM fire flow from any fire hydrant for a 2 hour duration in addition to domestic supply. The computation shall be based 'upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure - in the supply main from which the flow is. measured at the time of measurement. 2. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants so that no point of any building is more than 250 feet from a fire hydrant measured along approved vehicular travel ways. a. exterior surface of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow, and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. % b. curbs shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. c. hydrants shall not be -located closer than 25 feet to any building. . 3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and three copies of the water system plan to the Fire Marshal for review. Upon approval, one copy will be sent to the Building Department and the original will be returned to the developer. 4. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and approved by the water company with the following certification: "Itcertify that the design of the water system in PP 86-47 is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Fire Marshal ." 5. Prior to delivery of combustible materials to the building site, the required water system shall be installed, operating and delivering the required flow. 6. Additional fire protection requirements may be necessary when the applicant submits specific planslfor consideration and approval . 7. All buildings over N/A square feet require an approved fire sprinkler system. Very truly yours, RAY HEBRARD �Fire Chief By ceA MIKE MCCONNELL Fire Marshal 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 FACILITIES PLANNER REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL O C T to Mffi AM PM 71819110111I L9111213141516 CASE NO(S) : PP 86-47 ! PROJECT: SCven unit senior apartment building. APPLICANT: Hlrry H. Schmitz, P.O. Box 3992, Palm Desert 92261-3992 Enclosed please find materials describing a project for which the following is being requested:) Construction of a seven-unit senior apartment building on Santa Rosa between SanlPascual and Portola. The attached data was prepared by the applicant and is being forwarded to you for comments and recommended conditions of approval . The city is interested in the probable Impacts on the environment ( including land, air, water, minerals, flora, fauna, noise, objects of historical or aesthetic significance) and recommended conditions of approval based on your expertise and area of concern. Your comments and recommended conditions of approval must be received by this office prior to 4:30 p.m. October In order to be discussed by the land division committee. The land division committee (comprised of director of community development, city building official , city engineer, fire marshal , and a representative of CVWU) will discuss the comments and recommended conditions of )approval and will forward them to the planning commission through the staff report. Any information received by this office after the receipt deadline will not be discussed by the land division committee. Sincerely, -- ---- -. -. , DSUSD COMMENT: School impact will -- -�1--------- -`��------------------ occur. Please require RAMON A. DIAZ I mitigation. DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT/PLANNING P � CS/tm Attachments PLEASE RETURN MAP WITH COMMENTS NOTICE OF DETERMINATION Negative Declaration TO: (X) Clerk of the Board of Supervisors ( ) Secretary for Resources County of Riverside 1416 Ninth St. , Rm 1311 4080I1_emon Street Sacramento, CA 95814 Riverside, CA 92502 FROM: CITY OF PALM DESERT 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 SUBJECT: Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108 or 21152 of the Public Resources Code. Protect Title/Common Name: Harry Schmitz, PP 86-47 Date of Project Approval : December 2, 1986 I I State Clearinghouse Number (if submitted) : N/A Contact Person: Catherine Sass Project Location: Santa Rosa Way, east of San Pascual Avenue. Proiect Description: Seven unit senior apartments. This is to advise that the City of Palm Desert has made the following determinations regarding the above described project: 1 . The project ( ) will , (X) will not, have a significant effect on the environment. 2. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared in connection with this project ursuant to the provisions of CEQA. X A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. A copy of the Negative Declaration may be examined at the above city hall address. 3. Mitigation measures (X) were, ( ) were' not, made a condition of the approval of the project. 4. A statement of Overriding Considerations ( ) was, (X) was not, adopted for this project. Signature Title ;3 nJQFSUPERVISORS j� ?eID Date Received for Filing NOV C 91987 Please return date-stamped copy in the enclosed envelope. GEr i OF SUSUc� CLERK of tM'-W BOA?D OF PERUtC�S rbunty of R:verswe.ante of c;i -na ry CD 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 November 18, 1986 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION ACTION CASE NO: 317 MF APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) : HARRY SCHMITZ, P.O. Box 3992, Palm Desert, CA 92260. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of seven unit senior apartment projdct. LOCATION: Santa Rosa Way between San Pascual and Porto la Avenue. ZONE: R-3 S.O. Upon reviewing_ the submitted plans and presentations by staff and by the applicant, the architectural commission granted preliminary approval subject to conditions. Date of Action: November 12, 1986 Vote: Carried 2-1-1 (Commissioner McCrea opposed, Commissioner Cook abstained) (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert withinfifteen ( 15) days of the date of the decision. ) ------------- ----------------------------------------------------------- STAFF COMMENTS: Please read the attached minutes. MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION NOVEMBER 12, 1986 It w s moved b Commissioner Drur seconded b i s Y Y, Y Comm s inner McCrea to grant preliminary approval subject to the use of barrel tile and a three foot berm that effectively screens the parking area which would not restrict the view of the art area. Carried 4-0-1 (Chairman Gregory abstaining) . 2. CASEINO: 277 MF APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): WITOLD MULLER, 10410 Lower Azusa Road, El Monte, CA 91731 ; JIM FEIRO, 73-955 Highway ill , Palm Desert, CA 92260. i NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of landscape plan for three triplexes. LOCATION: South side Fred Waring Drive between San Pasqua] and San Pablo. ZONEI: R-2 Chairman Gregory reviewed the landscape plan and made written comments to be addressed by the applicant. It Ias moved by Commissioner Drury, seconded by Chairman Gregory to grant preliminary approval subject to the conditions listed by Chailrman Gregory as shown in the file and subject to final drawings showing equipment access to the pool and lawn areas. Carried 5-0 J. CA56 NO: 317 MF APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): HARRY SCHMITZ, P.O. Box 3992, Palm Desert, CA '92260. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of seven unit i senior apartment project. LOCATION: Santa Rosa Way between San Pascual and Portola Avenue. ZONE: R-3 S.O. Ms. Sass explained that the applicant had requested to be reviewed by planning commission prior to review by architectural commission after the architectural commission had expressed concern over the site plan. She noted the changes that had been made which included addition of a few feet of landscape area at the rear of the project, deletion of one parking space to add landscaping and addition of a 5 MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION NOVEMBER 12, 1966 bench, table and picnic bench. She stated that the usable open space required by code had not been provided. Mr. (Diaz indicated that we seem to be getting the wrong type of . developments on the wrong sites with the SO zoning. He explained that) the minimum unit size for a studio is 450 square feet. The applicant is providing 600 square foot units which is the minimum size for a one bedroom unit. He suggested that the front unit be placed at the rear of the site and the size of the three rear units be reduced. This would allow for additional usable open space at the front of the site. He noted that the SO zone was not created to provide crowded sites. He advised that the applicant could ask for a variance on the side yard setbacks which would provide additional open space. Chairman Gregory was opposed to less than 10 foot setbacks. Commissioner Drury was concerned that the units would be too small for active seniors. I Ms. Sass indicated that One Quail Place has units that are approxi- matehy the same size as what is proposed for this project. Commissioner Martin agreed that the front unit should be moved to the dear of the site to provide additional usable open space. Commissioner Cook felt that the open space provided was enough for the seven residents that would be living there. Mr. (Schmitz indicated that the project has been developed under the R-3 Istandards. He noted that he is allowed to go two story but chose not to. Ms . Sass explained that under the R-3 standards this site would have only been allowed five units rather than seven. She recommended that the applicant go to two story which would easily handle the seven units and provide more than adequate usable open space. Commlissioner Drury had no problem with the plans as drawn. She questioned what other type of amenities seniors would need. Mr. Diaz noted that they could use a small pool , horse shoe or shuffle board area. 1. Commissioner Cook indicated a shuffle board area could be provided at the rear of the site. 6 I MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION NOVEMBER 12, 1986 Commi stoner McCrea felt that several small open space areas would not be as valuable as one large open space area. He agreed with the recommendation of having three units along the rear of the site and having one large open space area at the front of the site. Commissioner Cook was concerned with other senior projects that have less open space area than is proposed here. Chairman Gregory suggested the applicant present drawings by the next meeting showing the three units along the rear of the site. He noted that there may have to be some changes made to the plan because the applicant is asking for the maximum on this site. It wags moved by Commissioner Drury, seconded by Chairman Gregory to grant preliminary approval subject to the rear area at units 4 & 5 be used as additional open space recreation area. Carried 2-1-1 (Commissioner McCrea opposed, Commissioner Cook abstaining - Commissioner Martin left before the vote) . 4. CASE NO: 283 MF APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): ROBERTSON HOMES, 1003 Cooley Drive, Suite 102, 1olton, CA 92324. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of architecture for single family homes. LOCATION: Northeast corner Cook and Fred Waring. ZONE: PR-7 Commissioner Drury noted for the record that she may have a conflict of interest with this case. Mr. soy indicated that the tract had already been approved and recorded. They are now asking for approval of architecture for the single family homes. Comm ssioner Martin questioned the setback of the single family homes from the apartments. Mr. Joy indicated it was between 60 and 70 feet. He noted that there is a 17 foot setback from curb to the perimeter wall with an eight foot meandering sidewalk provided. Commissioner Martin requested elevation drawings of the rear and sides of the homes. He was concerned with solar protection on these exposures. He questioned the size of the overhang on the front 7 5 CITY OF PALM DESERT DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT TO: PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: IOVEMBER 4, . 1986 CASE N0: PP/CUP 86-47 REQUEST: Ipproval of a negative declaration of environmental impact, precise plan of design and conditional use permit to allow construction of a seven unit senior citizen apartment project located on Santa Rosa Way, east of San Pascual Avenue. APPLICANT: HARRY H. SCHMITZ ✓� P.O. Box 3992 Palm Desert, CA 92261 �PI. BACKGROUND: A. DESCRIPTION OF SITE: l The4roper ty-ls_ va_cant_,,=appr-.ox mately P3,000 square feet, relafively ;level,IT andsloping- to the north. B. �ADJACENT-ZONING AND LAND USE: NORTH: R-3, S.O./Vacs v SOUTH: R-2, S.O./Multi-family housing`(W,�!hLe ifs Olf\ / EAST: R-31 S.O./Sin 3\�rl WEST: R-3, S.O./Singlegle family residence t.{ C. GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION: I` Medium density residential . g II. PROJECT DESCRIPT[ON: � < < r:` _ xroN I < A. <CODE_P_ROVES10NS, IN ART FORM: the od Re Ire t Provided Aif unit size 450 sq. ft. 600 sq. ft. d�en'_sity for 600 sq. ft. units on 13,000 sq. ft. lot 6 people per, acre/13,000 sq. ft. 10 12.25 parking 7 spaces 8 spaces height 24 ft. 12 ft. setback 10/20/20 10/22/20 . I STAFF REPORT PF/CUP 86-47 NOVEMBER 4, 1986 - I Code Requirement Provided open space-per d.u. 300 sq. ft. 92 sq. ft. building coverage 50% max. 33% ,�The_I enior-overi-ay density-is-based-on unit size. eThe"app1-scant has provided s.tudio�apartments -at the_one`_-bedroo- square--footage..)A ge en sous-ca_l-cu'leEion--on-this site would only a}low six-units,-at 10� CP�A- Thherequi-red-open- n- space- i-s—defined -as-group-usable/common-open space, Inlended-to be--landscaped-and/or recreational. As presented, overt 50%-of the-stte_- i-s-in pavifig:or othe--hard_ surface -and-on'ly 625- ,square feet could-be considered--landscaped`or recreational? or- 9 -0 B. SITEI DESIGN, PARKING AND ACCESS: Thelproposed_.design--i.s--for--seven--600-square--foot-studio ap tments located in two_r"ows-fac i ng-each other-.--Parkl rig spaces,__ i e IUD ng tfou port spaces;-are-provided-dIrectiy"-off--the street-taking the sootthern=-ttiird�of_-the-site.- -A-per-lmeter-block-wallisix-feet^in he_i-ght-wi-1-l--surround=the--buCiding-area. -=The—common area is wheel nchai-r accesslbl-e:a C. ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPING: cTheLarch'itecture--andTl'andscaping-meet-minimum-requiremen_t's-wi-th-the n_o� ,except-i.on..of-open-space.-The- appl-i-cant-_shows-a_chatn-l-ink fen_ce.in the-_f-rontyard whYch w1"ll have- to=,be ,repl'aced'-wi-th block -wal I , wrought_ir_on,_or other-acceptable-material . iiI. DISCUSSION: Staff-finds--the=studio des-1- n -(5 the-units-attractive. t The='b`uilding p-lacement--and--common_ area-appear-crowded-and--the--open -space-appears unusabi-e. The design-rev-tew-board-fe=l-t-del-eting-one_-unit-would--provide add it I one I--open--space-and-landscaping:_.Staff_i_s--concer`eed-w i th-crowded, poorly--designed-common-areas-encouraging-shut=ins--among-senior-residents. Furtherrronf---11-texists—where backing-' aca interferes- with-planter areas..-)i The_detetion_ of=the one - space- over requirement would pcov-fde addit-ionai-space-for backing:---, 2 STAFF REPORT PP/CUP 86-47 NOVEMBER 4, 1986I �Uec 'The architectural_review com`mmi'ttee.df_r`ected..the_-applicant-in favor_of-ttie abo`e--improvements. The ,ppl_i-cant-has-chosen to--continue-prese at onto) the-�piannang-commission w-ithout.any redesign. IV. ANALYSIS: .Staf_f=f_i'Lat-the-proposed-projett—, without suggested-mi-tigat.i.on measures:,._does--not-reflect the-unique--requirements._of_seni6P—citizens nor, does`-the"overal-l�qual•ity-of�deslgn-ref-1 ce t the--Intent-of-the senior, Chous_i ng-ol erl'ay. -`-- `-- —�� - Staff-fee l s-they-woui d-be-do ing-a-d s ssery Yce-recommend i ng-approva 1"of estudio apartments-that_ provide-no outs ide-amenity,- -gather sng..place,_ or �r common_re� l reationa-- - l-areas-for-ou�city's_ senior cit4zens-.) V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff-recommends-dental-of-the__app _leation-based on(the_abo .eve atL6 A Adopt the findings. B. Ado it Planning Commission Resolution No. , denying PP/CUP 86-47. V1. ATTACHMENTS: A. Oralt resolution. B. Legal notice.. C. Exhibits and supporting data. Prepared by ( _ S Reviewed and Approved by /tm 3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. I A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, DENYING A PRECISE PLAN OF DESIGN FOR A SEVEN UNIT SENIOR CITIZEN APARTMENT PROJECT LOCATED ON SANTA ROSA WAY, EAST OF SAN PASCUAL AVENUE. CASE NO. PP/CUP 86-47 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 4th day of November, 1986, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider the request of HARRY SCHMiTZ for denial of a negative declaration of environmental impact, precise plan of design and conditional use permit to allow the construction of the above described project on a lot on Santa Rosa Way, more particularly described as: APN 627-121-020 WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said planning commission did find the following facts and reasons to exist to justify denial of said precise plan and conditional use permit: 1 . Open space is Insufficient. 2. Density and intensity is too high. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1 . That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the commission in this case; 2. Thal approval of Precise Plan/Conditional Use Permit 86-47 are hereby denied. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 4th day of November, 1986, by the following vote, to wit:. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: BUFORD CRITES, Chairman ATTEST: RAMON A. DiAZ, Secretary /tm CITY OF PALM DES ERT MEMO INTEROFFICE TO: Catherine Sass o!aql�oE 6fn,, FROM: Brent Conley RE: 86-47 Seven Unit Senior Apt. Bldg. DATE: October 23, 1986 The apartments as proposed should be equipped with solid core entry/exit doors with 190 degree doorviewers, deadbolt locks and locking devices on all windows and sliding doors to provide security for the residents. The apartment plan could be enhanced by possibly moving the spa area to the center of the complex to allow easier occupant access. The area lat .the front where the spa is proposed could be changed to include picnic tables and chairs to encourage residents to socialize The main entrance will probably have the complex' s mail box and residents could use the common area to gather and sort mail . The lighting of the complex is very important to add to the feeling of security for the residents. A minimum standard of 1/2 FC for tk,e interior of the complex and 1 FC for the parking area is esspntial . ;;�T I, Brent Conley Crime Prevention Officer BC/rrt I zi INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES wig Q9 AVIt LO FROM : DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS OCT 2 4 1986 SUBJECT: PR�iSF, {7LANt G V<,-47 COMMUNI�IY of�PALMLDESERiAfl1M[N'I DATE: G>.TSFL Zoe I q86 The following should be considered conditions of approval : Ol Drainage and signalization fund fees , as required by City ordinance , shall be paid prior to (-ra d-'c ' -- c� - Fnap (gradilig permit issuance) . 2 ) Drainage facilities shall be provided , per Ordinance No . 218 and the Master Drainage Plan , to the specifications of the Director of Public Works . 3 ) Storm drain construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study by the private engineer that is approved by the Department of Public Works . ® Full I public improvements , including traffic safety lighting , as required by ordinance and the Director of Public Works , shall) be installed in accordance with City standards . 05 Improvement plans for water and sewer systems shall be approved by the respective service districts with "as-built" Plans' submitted to the Department of Public Works prior to the iroject final . O6 Complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required by ordinance , to the Director of Public Works for checking and approval before construction of any improvements is commenced . The engineer shall submit "as-built" plans prior to the acceptance of the Improvements by the City. All private ( � (driveways and parking lots ) shall be Inspected by the engineering department and a standard inspection fee shall be paid prior to f : t�a —mat -) (grading permit issuance) . �B Landscaping maintenance on Sol,,-r-g eQca A/ shad) be provided by the ( hemeowr_. ' asaQe+er ,a..-; (property owner) . . 9) Existing utilities on shall be undergrounded per each respective utility dis- trict' s recommendation . If determined to be unfeasible applicant shall agree to participate in any future utility undergrounding district . it ` 10 ) Traffic safety striping on shall be provided to the specifications of the Director of Public Works . A traffic control plan must be submitted to and approved by the Director of Public Works before placing Pavement markings . I1 Complete grading plans and specifications shall be submit- ted , as required by ordinance , to the Director of Public Works for checking and approval prior to Issuance of any permits . V Dedication of -F o feet of right-of-way on _Id,) shall be done prior to issuance of any perm is and approval of plans . 13 Installation of curb and gutter , matching paving and SIX sidewalk on R=a Wa 14 ) Waiver of access to except at approved locations shall be granted on the final map. 15 ) Close unused driveway with full height curb and gutter . 16 Offsite improvement plans to be approved by Public Works Department and a surety posted to guarantee the required offsite improvements prior to ( I + -P) (grading permit issuance ) . 17,) Full Improvement of interior streets based on (60 ' residen- tial ) (private ) ( industrial ) street standards as established in accordance with Chapter 26 , Section 26 . 40 . 040 , C.P. D . Code . 18) Installation of one-half landscaped median in or cash payment for one-half the cost of landscaped median at the option of the Director of Public Works . 19) Traffic analysis to be prepared for .the project to address the specific impacts on existing networks ( street and intersections ) and the proposed mitigation measures recom- mended for approval by the City. 20 Installation of sewers to serve this project . 21 Size , number and location of driveways to Public Works specifications with only gftyL driveway approach (sz) to be allowed to serve this property. 22 ) No (new) requirements . (Original conditions apply) 23 ) Grading permit Issuance shall be subject to the waiver of parcel map first being approved and recorded. 24) Complete (parcel ) (tract) map ( s ) shall be submitted as required by ordinance to the Director of Public Works for checking and approval and be recorded before Issuance of any permits . 25 Any and all off-site Improvements shall be preceded by the approval of plans and the Issuance of valid encroachment permit ( s ) by, the Department of Public Works . 26 A complete preliminary soils investigation , conducted by a registered soils engineer , shall be submitted to and approv- ed by the Department of Public Works prior to issuance of the grading permit . 27) Applicant shall secure reciprocal ingress and egress access easements from the owner ( s ) of lot( s ) IYI 29 ) Richard J . Folkers , P . E .2 RA/RJF Rev . 7/25/86 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 Date DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING AND SAFETY PRELIMINARY REVIEM .OF PLANS THIS IS NOT A PLAN CHECKI DEVELOPMENT: The comments below are based on the following assumptions and code groups: 1985 Uniform Building Code 1985 Uniform Plumbing Code 1985 Uniform Mechanical Code 1984 National Electrical Code Title 24 Handicapp / Accessibility Standards Title 24 Energy Conservation Standards Title 24 Multi-Family Adaptability Standards Code Assumption: Building Classification Type of Construction �1 Sprinklered Allowable Floor Area: Basic Allowable ��VIJV Setbacks Sprinklered Multi-Story Factor Total. Allowable Sq.Ft. �O CHECKLIST kuamit shall be prepared by a licensed California architect. Show nt number on plans. a list of features proposed that show compliance to the multi- y handicapp regulations. Use a maximum cap of $740.00 per adapt- able dwelling unit. Page two. . . HANDICAPPED: Site requirements. per handicapp standards. PARKING: �f1 [03 Show number of stalls required. Revise parking stall locations to allow main entry access. Show international logo, loading and unloading zone requirements. Ramp from parking. lot to sidewalk not shown on plans. BUILDING ACCESS: �` N ❑ Doors shall be minimum 32" clear in width. U ❑ Provide 18" space on the swing side of doors. \ ❑ On plans, show height of all bathroom accessories. i — ❑ Handicapp bathroom layout does not conform to current standards. Before further comments can be made, additional plans and specifications are needed for review. The following plans must be submitted to the Department of Building 8 Safety for ]an review: Architectural Drawings and Details. Structural Drawings and Calculations. Complete Electrical , Mechanical and Plumbing Plans and Specifications. Title 24 Energy Conservation Documentation Forms. COMMENTS: ZLLER PRINCIPAL PLANS EXAMINER RIVERSIDE COUNTY �pEof CA(AF°9A� FIRE DEPARTMENT ' IN COOPERATION WITH THE COUNTY ,'..t' CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY e RIVERSIDE '::: ; - RAY HEBRARD xr of FIRE CHIEF O WEST SAN JACINTO AVENUE October;?l,$;•1896s4 \�1%' 197I TELEPHONE:(77 4)6 CALIFORNIA92370 -3183 Ramon Diaz �J C../ Planning and Community n CT 2 11986 Development Director 73510 Fred Waring COMMUNICTU OFE �PALM DESERNT T Palm Desert, CA 92260 Reference: PP 86-47 Applicant: Harry Schmitz Dear Mr. Ramon Diaz - The following fire protection requirements are in accordance with the Uniform Fire Code and Life Safety Code. standards. 1 . Install a water system capable of delivering 2soDGPM fire flow from any fire hydrant for a 2 hour.duration in addition to domestic supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is. measured at the time of measurement. 2. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants so that no point of any building is more than 250 feet from a fire hydrant measured along approved vehicular travel ways . a. exterior surface of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow, and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. b. curbs shall be painted red 15 feet ,in either direction from each hydrant. c. hydrants shall not be located closer than 25 feet to any building. 3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and three copies of the water system plan to the Fire Marshal for review. Upon approval , one copy will be sent to the Building Department and the original will be returned to the developer. 4. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and approved by the water company with the following certification: "Iacertify that the design of the water system in PP 86-47 is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Fire Marshal ." 5. Prior to delivery of combustible materials to the building site, the required water system shall be installed, operating and delivering the required flow. 6. Additional fire protection requirements may be necessary when the applicant submits specific plans for consideration and approval . 7. All buildings over N/A square feet require an approved fire sprinkler system. Very truly yours, RAY HEBRARD �Firne Chief By Q By MIKE MCCONNELL Fire Marshal iCl`arC}� ` ec-V'- QD1 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 FACILITIES PLANNER REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OCT 10 1W6_ AM PM 71819110111I L911121314 A IS CASE NO(S) : PP 66-47 ! PROJECT: Seven unit senior apartment building. APPLICANT: Harry H. Schmitz, P.O. Box 3992, Palm Desert 92261-3992 Enclosed please find materials describing a project for which the following is being requested: Construction of a seven-unit senior apartment building on Santa Rosa between San Pascual and Portola. The attached data was prepared by the applicant and is being forwarded to you for comments and recommended conditions of approval . The city is interested in the probable impacts on the environment ( including land, air, water, minerals, flora, fauna, noise, objects of historical or aesthetic significance) and recommended conditions of approval based on your expertise and area of concern. Your comments and recommended conditions of approval must be received by this office prior to 4:30 p.m. October 23L1985, in order to be discussed by the land division committee. The land division committee (comprised of director Of community development, city building official , city engineer, fire marshal , and a representative of CVWU) will discuss the comments and recommended conditions of approval and will forward them to the planning commission through the staff report. Any information received by this office after the receipt deadline will not be discussed. by the land division committee. Sincerely, DSUSD COMMENT: School impact will ----- - --------b -- -------- ---- occur. Please require RAMON A. DIAZ mitigation. DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT/PLANNING CS/tm Attachments PLEASE RETURN MAP WITH COMMENTS (U2:a�u� off 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 October 20, 1986 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION ACTION CASE NO: 317 MF APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) : HARRY H. SCHMITZ, P.O. Box 3992, Palm Desert, CA 92261 . NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Seven unit senior apartment project. LOCATION: Santa Rosa Way between San Pascual and Portola Avenue. ZONE: R-3 S.O. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Upon reviewing the submitted plans and presentations by staff and by the applicant, the architectural commission continued this case. Date of Action: October 14, 1986 Vote: Carried 4-0 (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen ( 15) days of the date of the decision. ) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ STAFF COMMENTS: Please read the attached minutes. I i MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION OCTOBER 14, 1986 She was also concerned with the Mobil Mart being located near a restaurant. Mr. Flood . explained that they were trying to provide adequate circulation by keeping the structures small . He noted that the restaurant and Mobil Mart had no relation to each other. Commissioner McCrea withdrew his previous motion. Commissioner Martin explained that if the applicant wished to go ahead with the original industrial type of design he would be willing to approve that. It was moved by Commissioner Martin, seconded by Chairman Gregory to grant preliminary approval to the original proposal and site plan subject to the following conditions. 1 . Canopy to have texturized surface. 2. Stucco on buildings to be a muted off-white color. 3. Provide meandering sidewalk around perimeter of site. Carried 2- 1-1 (Commissioner Drury opposed, Commissioner McCrea abstained) . 2. CASE NO: 317 MF APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) : HARRY H. SCHMITZ, P.O. Box 3992, Palm Desert, CA 92261. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Seven unit senior apartment project. LOCATION: Santa Rosa Way between San Pascual and Portola Avenue. ZONE: R-3 S.O. Ms. Sass explained that the proposal was for a seven unit senior apartment complex. Chairman Gregory felt the site was crowded and suggested deleting one unit to provide additional open space and landscaping. Commissioner Martin noted that one parking space could also be deleted. B MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION OCTOBER 14, 1986 Mr. Diaz felt the design of the site would encourage shut-ins among the senior residents and questioned the amount of usable open space. Mr. Schmitz explained that the required open space is provided which he has tried to locate in one centralized area. Mr. Diaz stated that the standards may need to be increased because of people crowding sites. Chairman Gregory explained that if the applicant disagreed with the commissions decision then he should appeal to city council . He noted that even though the project meets code this does not mean that the commission has to approve it if it is not acceptable to them. He felt the site was too crowded. Commissioner Drury expressed concern over the parking backing into a planter area. She suggested deleting one parking space to provide additional space for backing. It was moved by Chairman Gregory, seconded by Commissioner Martin to continue this case pending planning commission review of the site plan. Carried 4-0 3. CASE NO: SAT ANT 3 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): SUNRISE ELECTRONICS, 73-540 Highway Ill, Palm Desert, CA 92260. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of satellite antenna. LOCATION: North side of Highway Ill east of San Pablo. ZONE: C-1 S.P. Mr. Smith explained that the applicant had previously requested approval of a pole mounted satellite antenna which would face south. Commission denied the request due to the visibility. He noted that the rear of the building is now blocked by a newly constructed building and other satellites of this type have been approved. Commission informed the applicant he would be required to provide the appropriate engineering information for wind load. It was moved by Commissioner McCrea, seconded by Commissioner Martin to approve the satellite antenna as submitted. Carried 4-0 9 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES DIVIS. PERMIT APPLICATION FOR A SUBSURFACE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM — — Applicant: Submit this form with four copies of a scaled plot plan(1.20 scale)drawn to County specifications required on the attached check list.' A nonrefundable filing fee of S37 is required when the application is submitted.Check must be made payable to the County of Riverside. Building Department Application Log # Naeve(Owner.Agent coelrocim.Etc.) visiting Address ilanay N . _'5ebrM,-r7 Pdd 3997— . _ Cdy State Zip Code Telephohe 941- 0 PC5CaT « , 9yaG 1 4,11 - 3�/-2y6� :. Q 'Job Pfope Address 'City or Cornmunity 'Legal Description of Property.(Loh,PM,TR) 0 73-8/0 .S9m-rA Qos,4 P{4(,M P475 EX 7' Lor 28 /�aB*+ ✓` �+�•,T 'Assessor's Parcel No. Water Agency or WeA K- Planning Case I �� La S'ue rAe" DES CO, - Use of Permi "Z /Y/ — !21 -b Z O fff tlrC£S 915Tr SFD,MH She Propitiation Etc SyX 159 signaWre of R l IDale • ""'The above Inlormalbn must tie'44bd from a�dMB�ApplkeNon STAFF USE — DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE Initial Date Certification of Existing S.D.:System required. ❑ Yes 11 No WOCB Clearance required. ❑ Yes M No Soils feasibility report required. ❑ Yes 11 No f T Detailed boring re Pon required. / ❑ Yes •No m Detailed contour plot plans required. .` ❑ Yes 11 No Staff Specialist approval required. i ❑ Yes No Lot Ins Z pection Date- 0 l— Soils/boring report by Project# Date LIJ Soils Map Page Soil Type " Approved by ),r !j' Date !°�7• Type of System: ���� - No. oBe d o�ms (1) Septic Tank Soil Rate Required ❑Existing L7New ❑Additional El Replacement ( br ,/ram, f,� Tray Z�Gals. -Z r !� �/ •� - (2) Leach line sq. ft. Sidewall allowance Install Lines) Ft. Long, Leach bed Sq. (Bottom trench area) ft. rock/ Sq. Ft. Ft. wide with min. inches Ft. o)bottdm per running n i O NIA rock below drain lines%' area Leach lines/bed-special design for slope: (3) Pit Diameter No. Pits Pill BITSeepa,,, Pit total depth Applicable " ❑ 5' CFI 6' coo owable depth t' NIA (Overburden factor Q / (. r ,...,r.•/ter.,./ J�.v42el, / - tL I This application is approved/denied for the design of a subsurface disposal system as indicated on the accompanied plot plan using the requirements set forth in Section B above. A building permit is necessary for the installation of the above-designed system. U �(1� Septic tank and sewer lines must be 50'from any wells Z (2) Leach lines must be 100'min. from any wells including expansion area p Seepage pits must be 150'min. from any wells including expansion area W sronalure d Health aleial Data co RECEIPT NO. C) L Issued by Date District: ❑ Riverside Ell'rndio ❑ Hemet ❑ Perris ❑ Rancho Calif. ❑ Blythe Distribution: WHITE—Office file YELLOW—Applicant PINK—Bldg. Dept. GOLDENROD—Pending File DOHsnN.ln(Rev.ores) " e•-o• J W I m G [6 r ex—u vx• o G •'.% Gi to D G: I--1- r•-r• L c•-o• L r-e ve• D 1N � rIl b �t In O LL x) c: 6 I 1 J d < r11 y O u r I m D a a ---- I ... __._I sKLv D -`{ u CJ- _1... _ e P_ 1 0• 6-e' 6'-e lit• _ � 3 ���.,,t xe-n vz• E X 1 5 T I N G 5 1 N G I E F A 11 1 I r R F S I C F. IT �. F SIIP.'M 5•_O•,IJ•_L• i•_e• 4•_p• le._p. Ip._p. .-p. I K rin..M Y �- r=IsnNe v C ux-ur« .1.11 wens ro erxuI ls.' a 5 C S r D 6 � TN � LL I I- r�( r t I \ I• ax ✓�� • Ip r it ------------- I 1 .. I J A -j �wunifxo D O .t n,ili. R F— u�� { rI.=xitxn (/ :- ✓- -� 'TI •� - 1 r 4 _Lati I. Y 1 I 1 n.wlC.r=p . ' I Ill `�• I I I a • l Y > 7.fA*I .;, :' I' J I u ur y� -a� i O ,%• A ti. r D.n , 1 .P ' .i. I} f'prS SrDE ✓�. 1 'i a _ 0 ¢ PATIO f 4 GhyKp�.� KV.e• KM WALL KV INL. V0.L eeCM151M le e' 1l�IpgiM rnCr[nit LIK '•/•� ---�_._ /" 3L r.t /Il 7' t64ry S.qe cot E X 1 5 T I N G 5 1 X P L E X R E. N T A L U N I T SEVEN UNIT SENIOR APARTMENTS ��;1�i�I Nov.es.t9ab SCNMITZ ENTERPRISES, INC. P IIIL U� II 11. CU�h ur�.' flt�u ^• P.O-BOX 3992, PALM DESERT CALIFORNIA 92261-3992 .- (619) 341-2468 346-2022 .n I' J � W m �� f- m It•-n .,I• - .a n n r y � � .ter 11 I � 0 : � . I � OPT 0 rn r- `.. rn� rI v D r A i —srav-.w roLi• — L✓_-"�I d IL1 Ili i Fn • 6 rn ` i z r\�'1 t �..'... r-e vx' l' � L — f---- -- , o^ T a o S o z. S c cc)) d z ^ r zt.-°- ,• , P°_°• . . EX 1 5 T 1 NG 51 N G L E F A M I LY R E 5 1 DENCE L +. en sn .• ouH�tr«r/a[ Horns TO nrnu .__.- -- __ ram - ^[ - - .S' -- ran° r.n o-- __ .c.- •1. • Z Y L _______..-...______ I C ` Y VK I 'on ..LY I9 I •• I - cD O Ts J.[ tw. }�. 8 ° r I-__ 7 n.Yl tx° �•ruKlxl F �. : :7 ' 1 r e I I C I _ f r z { I n[anrc I fl Lll° J € . .' ' • • a KY t'•"JILIM1 Y/•°LINO["1 MY e' HIIM 1I(L. YILL e[CMASIHI x NiI1T,MerCl111 LIK ga_ I s� _ - EX I S.T'I NG 51 X P L E X RENTAL U N I T A 1�11��r SEVEN UNIT SENIOR APARTMENTS 1 ' SEPT.30.19a - 1��i��� 1 As NOTED SCHMIT ENTERPRISES, INC. ailed h. cook a.i.a. 11� _.,•. P.O-BOX 3992, PALM DESERT m IIIIii' A N C CALIFORNIA 92261-3992 Iu111 (619) 341-2468 346-2022 N - 1)�]e.eiNYOH9r,n0lOM.et.PaMnESFP..CrL1100wuexTq.Irt coo lni 9 R.e] .. KrYciR WC GVUNS[ Dt:�AItt PAtK! Gf PUI:�trr P:'�•".:,jr ., r ' DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL tiiwLTii — Food Establishment - (/ - 't tFF Krj..Ll t OF l-t,! j Q r tl�(;( 27 Sewage oral v -�(' f t� 'fill Trailer Park g p ti Y 5�,� 1 �l r fF Motel, Apt., Hotel�� v.vr 3 S / Gaf Septic Tank �+ - 9 — Dwelling ! b:�;,n 1<c Sq. Ft. of Leach Line r =>-4 x 12 Seepagc PitS' - Commercial Building _1G Connection to Sewer - Tf Swimming Pool CSehror k P�eva) -- on-site regenc-ating weter softening devices may be discharg-d I-rc �h,c individual sewzy_ .,.�system herewith approved without cicarznce from the Water Qv 'ity C .: - Water supply s'i iv no fl-,�s ins:allatinn mu=_; be trcm an a^ Board. ppi�v I slurs zew:ica dispesai ire:I::Ca'i::n must con:orm with requir_.mc. is of ce-rer�t Unifor^ 'riur;bieg Co,!e, --- _ . ny cutting, grading, - - "in, in excess of four (4) feet wi!i ;wl;ify E,.age disposal approval. Apprcval has been cb:.::n-o from the Regional Water Quality Control Board fcr ;nstaha;inn of the s age disposal system. - -','s to certify that the Riverside County Department of Public Health approves for Ohs Y, constructir insiallation the item(s) checked above. By Stairways 2-3305(s) 1 Stairway treads must be slip-resistant with smooth, rounded or beveled edges, and no abrupt edges at the nose. The upper approach to a stairway and all stairway treads outside a building 2-3305(r) are to be marked by a strip of clearly contrasting color, at least 2 inches wide (a painted strip is acceptable). The strip is to be placed parallel to and not more than one inch from the nose of the step or landing. The strip material must be at least as slip-resistant as the other stair treads. 2-3305(s) 2 3 The nosing should not project more than 1-112 inches past the face of the riser below, and the risers should be solid enough to prevent objects larger than 1/4 inch from passing through them. 2-3305(j) Stairways must have handrails on both sides. Private stairways 30 Exception 3 inches or less in height may have handrails on one side only. 2-3305(j) Stairways serving one dwelling unit in an apartment house are allowed Exception 2 to have only one handrail; but if the stairway is open on one or both sides, handrails are to be provided on the open side(s) . 2-3305(j) 1 Other stairways must have handrails on both sides. A stairway more than 88 inches wide must have at least one intermediate handrail for each 88 inches of required width. Intermediate handrails shall be spaced at approximately equal intervals along the entire length of the stairway. 2-3305(j) 2 Handrails must be continuous for the full length of the stairway. The handrail must be 30 to 34 inches above the nosing of the treads, and extend at least 12 inches beyond the top nosing and 12 inches plus the tread width beyond the bottom nosing. The handrail must be returned or end in newel posts or safety terminals. If the extension of the handrail in the direction of the stair run creates a hazard, the extension must be made at right angles to the face of the returning wall. Where the stairs are continuous from landing to landing, the inner rail must be continuous, but need not extend into the landing. Handrails projecting from a wall are to be at least 1-112 inches from the wall. The rail's handgrip must be between 1-1/4 to 2 inches wide, or the shape must supply an equivalent smooth gripping surface with no sharp corners. Entry Ways 2-3301(m) 1 & 2 Applicable primary entrances to buildings are to be accessible to the physically handicapped. If the primary entrances are not being used by the disabled or their use is restricted, the entrances which are being substituted must be made accessible to and usable by the physically handicapped. 2-1213(b) 5 Every primary entrance and individual living accommodation shall have a door buzzer, bell, chime or equivalent. 7 O ED Inadequately anchored door mats inter (ere with wheelchair traffic Door Matt Firm Flush Mounted Mats Preferable i ii uini a sum a unamlz�uuiml wmi�i This diagram illustrates the specific requirements of these regulations and is intended only as an aid for building design and construction. Door < ` Pressure From Door Closer \ Bump at raised threshold blocks small wheel Smooth polished floor prevents traction on driving wheels. Problem: The condition above often makes rooms unaccessable to wheel- chairs. Wheelchair Obstacles Figure 33-1 2-3301(m) 3 Recessed doormats must be adequately anchored to prevent interference with wheelchair traffic. (See above) 2-3303(e) Every required exit must be large enough to permit a door at least three feet wide and six feet, eight inches high. Exit doors shall open at least 90 degrees, and provide a clear width of at least 32 inches. 2-3303(i) 1 The floor or landing shall be no more than 1/2 inch lower than the doorway threshold. Changes in level between 1/4 inch and 1/2 inch must be beveled, with a slope no greater than 50%. A ramp must be provided if the change in level is greater than 1/2 inch. 8 44"min. 1117.6 mm I L 81 2 m 145 457 clear 18-min. 8129 m .2 mm Space is necessary to allow backing and turning space for a wheelchair to clear the inswinging door. i eE ' ENI 48' min. 1200 min c E I Required Clear E I Space Vestibule FIGURE 33-SA I 9 min.exterior60 609.6 mm 18"min. interior c E I I 457.2 mm EoI Required Clear Space Door Clearances I I 2 min. 15 1524 mm---+{ Level Floor or Landing Figure 33-2 2-3303(i) 2 A level, clear area is to be created on each side of an exit door. The area should be at least 60 inches in the direction of the door swing, and 44 inches in the opposite direction of the door swing, as measured at right angles to the door in its closed position. 2-3303(i) 2.0 The width of this level area must extend 24 inches past the strike edge of the door for the exterior door, and 18 inches past the strike edge for interior doors. 2-3303(i) 2.13 In individual apartment house units, the level area must be 44 inches long, both in the direction, and opposite the direction, of the door swing, as measured at right angles to the plane of the door in its closed position. 2-3303(i) In apartments, private garages and sheds, where a door opens over a Exception 3 landing, the landing should be as long as the door width. Screen doors and storm doors may swing over stairs. The landing doesn't have to be as long as the screen doors and storm doors, but should be as long as the door width. 9 2-3301(i) 2.1) The space between two consecutive door openings in a vestibule, serving other than a required exit stairway, must have at least 48 inches of clear space from any door opening into the vestibule when the door is positioned at 90 degrees from its closed position. Doors in a series must swing either in the same direction or away from the space between the doors. (See below) _ _48min _� _ 48 min 1220 Two [tin_-led Doors in Series Door Clearances Type of Lock or Latch Exit doors must open from the inside without a key, or any special knowledge or effort. Exit doors from buildings or rooms serving 10 or fewer occupants may have a night latch, dead bolt, or security chain, as long as the doors can still be opened from the inside without a key, special knowledge or effort. In addition, these devices are not to be mounted more than 48 inches above the floor. 2-3303(c) Manually operated edge bolts, surface-mounted flush bolts and surface bolts are prohibited. When exit doors are used in pairs and automatic flush bolts are used , the door leaf with the flush bolt must have no doorknob or surface-mounted hardware. The unlatching of any leaf must not require more than one operation. 2-3303(c) 3 Hand activated door opening hardware is to be between 30 and 44 inches above the floor. Latching and locking doors that are hand activated and in a path of travel should have lever type hardware, panic bars, push-pull activating bars, or other hardware that provides passage without grasping the hardware. Doors to individual units must operate similarly, except that when the bolt and unlatching operation is per- formed with a key from the corridor or exterior side of the door, large bow keys (2 inch full bow or 1-1/4 inch half bow) must be provided instead of lever type hardware on the corridor side. Separate dead lock activation on the room side of corridor doors must have a lever handle or large thumb turn in an easily reached location. Hardware 2-3303(1) 1 Exit door hardware needs to be an approved type tested in accordance with the procedures established by State Fire Marshal Standards 33.2 and 33.3. 10 AFFORDABLE HOUSING INCOME AND RENT SCHEDULE DECEMBER, 1985 INI;CIhIE MONTHLY RENT HOIISEHOLDti MODERA11- MFUTAN LOWER VERY LOW UNIT SIZE MODERATE MEDIAN LOWER VERY LOW Studio I $22,501) 1,18,750 , $15,000 $ 9,400 450 sq. ft. $563 $469 $37( $235 minimum l Bedroom 2 25, 725 21 ,437 17, 150• 10,700 600 sq. ft. 643 536 429 267 minimum 7_ Ddrm/I Bath 3 28,950 74, 125 19, 300 12,05 800 sq. ft. 724 6113 462 301 minimum Bdrm/2 Bath 4 32, 176 261813 21 ,450 13,400 950 sq, ft. 804 670 536 335 minimum ,Bdrm/2 Bath 5 34,200 28,500 22,800 14,450 I h100 sq, ft.l 858 713 570 361 - minimum Y 3 Bdrm/2 Bath 3h,"2.2(i 30, 188 24, 150 15,550 1250 sq. ft. 906 755 604 389 y � minimum � �d z �� i `�� 1-�_. � r�(,m7d� ao � y�d1 / 7 FCC ERN K&:a 73-510 Fred Waring Or., Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 i P �qgt%gjLAN f 'ORN : Dept.of Planning and Comm it elo ment �.nl Yl �� P COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 'ff CITY OF PALM DESERT t� ARR 5C14MI ry Applicant (pleuse print) Q- 0 •(3 . -b99Z 3yI-2{6$ Molting Address PAL M D e 5 F P--T C A , Teiepnone City 9zz(a/- 399z_ state - Zip-Coos REQUEST: (Describe specific nature of approval requested). 7 APT. UAtI T5 n) SEatoe_ 0v6A.l.A y 20ti F PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: 1 z8 PAZ- M ItLLACC- aAROEN Tke M13 z1`s6 s {{ r 7 ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. EXISTING ZONING �-� 5-0. Property Owner Authorization The undersigned states that they ore the owner(s) of ins property described herein and hereby give author- ization for the filing of this application. 9 3a ,P6 nature Care Agreement apsolvrog the C ty of Paim Desert of liabilities relative to any deed restrictions. 1 00 13Y MY SIGNATURE ON THIS AGREEMENT, Absolve ills City of Palm Desert of all liabilities regarding any deed restrictions that may be applicable to the property described herein. Signature Data Applicants Signature Signature - Oate IFOR STAFF USE ONLY) Environmental Status. Accepted by: ❑ Ministerial Act E.A. No. ❑ Categorical Eo on ❑ HOC Negative Declaration Ilv�"4/A�\1 ILLS ❑ Other Reference Case No. aMsoMYeer�L survrczs/�Te air-ez CASE NO. Environmental Assessment Form TO THE APPLICANT: Your cooperation in comoletino this form and supplying the information requested will expedite City review of your application pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. The City is required to make an environmental asszss„ent on all projects which it exercises discretionary approval over. Applications submitted will not be considered complete until all information necessary to make"the environmental assessment is complete. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1 . Name, address , and telephone number of owner, applicant or project sponsor: 4ARav N . Seti P o 3 � qgZ PA LH PFS9 LT 6 4 - 12i461 2. Name, address and telephone number of person to be contacted con- cerning the project (such as architect, engineer, or other retire- sentative) : 3. Common name of project (if any) : N A 4. Project location (street address or general location) : 3 -S I C) 5 Qosq �'fty 5. Precise legal p perty (lot and tract number, or meets & bound z g �LMt Ui -�As e- G,ga0 Eou a, S — A SSE55. 27-/2/—OZo-3/ 6. Proposed use of the site (project for w e form f-i edfi ; describe the total undertaking, not just the current app ion approval being sought): Dv 2 . 7. Relationship to a larger project or series of projects (describe n0'A this project relates tp other activities , phases , and develop- ments planned, or now underway) : u/A 8. List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, to go forward, including those required by the City, Regional , State and Federal agencies (indicate sub- sequent approval agency name, and type of approval rzauired) : CIA EXISTING CONDITIONS : kkC. 10ig90 9. Project site area: 12 93 & 1 (size of property in sq. ft. or acreage) 10. Present zoning: Z 3 5.0• (Proposed zoning) : N�q 11 . General Plan land use designation: A,6N �eNsrTy ReyineNT,A _ 12. Existing use of the project site: VACANT 13. Existing use on adjacent properties: (Example - North, Shopping Center; South, Single Family Dwellings; East, Vacant, etc. ) . -5'(x 9�E)< C--AS Tr U9l,9N7- G07- Ald.2?N R,r/DENCC' WEST �j✓L-r, 0� E F4,"l _ / �{0vfi.�4 Sov7N 14. Site topography (describe) : ltE� grryELy LEve� w�GE raE THE NOR %N > 15. Are there any natural or manmade drainage channels through or adjacent to the property? N0z_ YES 16. Grading (estimate number of cubic yards of dirt being moved) : P1 A 17. List the number, size and type of trees being removed: 18. Describe any cultural , historic, or scenic aspects of the project site: WDA7�� 19. Residential Project (if not residential do NOT answer) A. Number and type of dwelling units (Specify no. of bedrooms) : 7 Sivy/ o B. Schedule of unit sizes : J�00 ! 3 c4eH 6aLllr 7 VA B& 1cisN tY LA/6ER) C. Number of stories Height 17- feet.&,&,4, -- D. Largest single building (sq. ft. ) a2V,90 ;t (hgt. ) ia' " E. Type of household size expected (population projection for the project) : eNN pia vvi-- F. Describe the number and type of recreational facilities : `�®4 POP E d G ov ,v GE A4AE4 G. Is there any night lighting of the project: YAAP Gib nPs �..4NOS�AAin/4 H. Range of sales prices or rents : $ to $ I. Percent of total project devoted to: Building . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 � Paving, including streets. . . . . . 9,1b Landscaping, Open, Recreation Area . . . . . . . ro fq7 20. Commercial , Industrial , Institutional or Other Project: A. T e of use s) and major function(s) (if offices , specify tyP & number) : B. Number of sq are feet in total building area : C. Number of stories Height feet. 0. Largest single buil ing (Sq. Ft. ) (Hgt. ) E. Number. of square feet in outdoor storage area: F. Total number of require parking spaces number provided ' G.' Hours of operation: H. Maximum number of clients, pa rons , shoppers, etc. , at one time: I. Maximum number of employees at on time: J. If patron seating is involved, stat the number: K. Is there any night lighting of the proj t: Yes No L. Percent of total project devoted to: Building . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Paving, including streets. . . . . . . Landscaping and Open Space (Recreation). . . Are the following items applicable to the projector its effects : Discuss below all items c:hec:ked yes (attach additional sheets as necessary) . YES NO 21 . Change in existing features of hillsides, or substantial alteration of ground contours. 22. Chance in the dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors / in the project vicinity. v 23. Subject to or resulting in soil errosion by wind / or flooding. V 24. Change in ground water quality or quantity, or / alteration of existing drainage patterns. 25. Change in existing noise or vibration level in the vicinity. Subject to roadway or airport noise (has the required acoustical report been / submitted?) V 26. Involves the use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic substances , flammables or explosives. 27. Involves the use of substantial amounts of / fuel or energy. 28. Changes the demand for municipal services / (police, fire, sewage, etc. ) 29. Changes the demand for utility services , beyond / those presently available or planned in the near future. 30. Significantly affects any unique or natural features, including mature trees. 31 . Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or public land or public roads. 32. Results in the dislocation of people. 1 YES i 0 33. Generates controversy based on aesthetics or other features of the project. [ ] Additional explanation of "yes" answers attached. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation, to the best of my ability, and that the facts , statements and information presented are true and correct to the best of my,knowledge and belief. NA22Y 5e6I M17Z Name Print or Type For Sign ure Date INITIAL STUDY FEE: $30. 00 (Make check payable to the City of Palm Desert and sub— mit with this form. ) a I � i U � I i --- I 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 RiCHARDS—' JOHN RICHARDS BETTY :J 47772 DEL NORTE CT INDI09 ,CA 92201 622200016-9 ....._._.. . . ._.. ,. . ., 73.510 FRED WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 NEST IRA _- 17726'TRAMONTO DR PACIFIC PALISADESI .CA 90272 k 622200013-6 - i CUtgw- 7&510 FRED WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 `aEST IRA ' 17726 TRAMONTO DR PACIFIC PALISADES* CA • 90272 622200013-6 (K:9t4h� coo g)Tl rnxi 1mcn=(Duva� 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 ELIZABETN C ' 43101 BALSAM 9226U PALM DESERT• CA OZ2200012-5 CHYZ ERNEST J CHYZ BENA M 13630 COLLINS DR WARREN# MI 48093 627121044-5 HUNTINGTON LEWIS S 2265 WESIWOOD BLV NO 591 LOS ANGELES# CA 90064 627121045-6 WIRE ROBERT J WIRE BETTY J 73835 FRED WARING DR PALM DESERT CA 92260 627121046-7 WIRE ROBERT J WIRE BETTY J 73835 ERED WARING DR PALM DESERT# CA 92260 627121047-6 RIDER - �-' - GERTRUD£ - RT 7 BOX 396 MCKINNEY# TX 75069 627121048-9 SAMUELSON GARY 283 C EAST 17TH ST COSTA MESA# CA 92627 627122003-1 DKN ASSOC C/C E V NATARAJAN 661 N 4TH ST BANNING# CA 92220 627122004-2 BOX THOMAS A 4000 BIRCH NO 201C NEWPORT BEACH# CA 92660 627122005-3 PALM DESERT INVESTORS C/O BETTY KNUDSEN 1615 ROLLINS RD STE G BURLINGAME# CA 94010 627122013-0 fOTAL LABELS PRINTED 29 aa##aaa##aaaa#aaaaaaa#a#a#o#eaaa�aaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaa#aaaaaaaa#aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 4####a#aDa##as#a###a##a##aa#aaaa#a#aa#aaaaa #aa#aaaa#aaaaa#aaa####aa#aa#a#a#aaaaaaaa aaaaaaa#aaaaaaaa#aa#a##### aaaaa OaaOaaa#4aa #aaaa#aaaa#aa##aaaaoaaa#aaaaaaaa#aaaaaaaaaaaaa aa##aaa#aa###aa#aaaaaaa##aaaaa#aaaaaaa#aaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaa##aaa##aa##aaa##aaaaaaaa##aaaaa aaaaaaaaa#aaaaaaaa#aaaaa## ##a## aaaaaa#aaaa TOTAL LABELS PRINTED 29 ###a####aa#�####m�###########tea##a####a#as►r�# a#a###aa#a##aa#a#####4#va#a##aa#a#aa#a#a aaoaaaaa#a#as##a##a###aa###a####aaa##a#a### CAMPBELL KURT 6 _ CAMPBELL BONNIE 20116 E STATE RD CERRITOSI CA 90701 622200019-2 S E J MANAGEMENT INC - ` C10 C M CARR P 0 BOX 11976 COSTA MESA* CA 92627 622200020-2 TATCHELL JOSEPH M P C BOX 53 REDONDO BEACHr CA 90277 622200060-8 COTY CONSTANTINE COTY RITA 2005 NOYA PL. PALOS VERDES ESTATES* CA 90274 627121017-1 PAGAN CURTIS ANTHONY PAGAN SHERION MAYE P 0 BOX 240 PALM SPRINGS* CA 92263 627121019-3 SCHMITZ HARRY H SCHMITZ JANN RENEE P G BOX 3992 PALM DESERT* CA 92261 627121020-3 WEISS GERHARD HALTER WEISS HILDEGARD E 74340 DE ANZA WAY PALM DESERT* CA 92260 627121021-4 WEISS GERHARD WALTER WEISS HILDEGARD E 73634 SANTA ROSA HAY PALM DESERTr CA 92260 627121022-5 PETTIT EDWARD M PETTIT CECELIA R 73666 SANTA ROSA WAY PALM DESERT CA 92260 627121023-6 FENTON RICHARD W 71472 SAN GORGONIO RD RANCHO MIRAGE* CA 92270 627121024-7 KAO TSAIR MING KAO SHU CHEN HUANG 44050 SAN PASQUAL AVE PALM DESERT CA 92260 627121033-5 NEST IRA 17726 TRAMONTO DR PACIFIC PALISADES* CA 90272 627121034-6 GRANILLO ELIAS GRANILLO ROSA MARIA P G BOX 8874 PALM SPRINGS* CA 92263 627121043-4 JJJJJJJJJJ 2222222222 OOf:OnCO JJJJJJJJJJ 222222222222 0000,C JO i a l7 97 M C JJ 22 00 00 JJ 22 00 JJ 22 00 JJ 22 00 V JJ 22 00 ot: i.i i f M nwww JJ JJ 22 000 11111111 222222222222 000P10- -C 111111 222222222222 00410oGC .c rraot aoo. an1...o aaciwa -a ^nm nns aaartca 14! OF START JOB 201 PRPAS35L 2 001 001 MASTER 14. OF START JOB 201 PRPAS35L 2 001 001 MASTER 14 OF START JOB 201 PRPAS35L 2 001 001 MASTER :4' OF START JOB 201 PRPAS35L 2 001 001 MASTER 14 OF START JOB 201 PRPAS35L 2 001 001 MASTER .4 a####aa#a#aa##a##fia#a4�aaa#aa#a#aa####aaaaaaa## ###########a########a###a#O#aaaa#a##a##a ##aMaaaaaa####a#######a########a#a###a#a##a####4 a######aa############O##a# ##a## #a#aa#a##a# ####aa##a######a###a####a#a##a#aaa#aa##a 1 f i - - - - - - - - � (ts . r a s i. i.l t 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 October 21, 1985 CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE CASE NO. PP/CUP 86-47 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by HARRY SCHMITZ for approval of a precise plan/conditional use permit for a seven unit senior citizen apartment project located on Santa Rosa Way, east of San Pascual Avenue, also known as: APN 627-121-020 _14 I- . 1716 P,IOT. AVE a Ariz/- ♦ u•/c robff ff/f:y rf/u rf/if r^T fiL roJfi- T. t1. ♦ - Z3. 3 tY ri SIe.• !! JJ .$ Jt 39 I/ A YI ! II miff MA/etA` n of ltI 018.100 t } MA 0.®.00t ® ® ® 01/Aff �I i •v Ot94• f Flo It, II i? 16 •se 11 2 x > PPe6cr�..._. A! ,I ArMRPO P. w •Pwar WAY a" • - , BK. ms P✓6 625 6IaA/aJr f.. n... u .... ... . .. 3 nrn S � • a _.._ .- °o :.,-w 4i, .,.v.fe_ -1' - u •, I..r.a2f_ . . '. arl /J .a`j J . /O Po.t _.f,J /b4 a . t3 Q �•' M1 { l �O a.614S 0..61 A,I - 0.6IAOt 0.57A,I ,l A lr ilJ � 2i �✓ w,JJfJ 4 .f t Nfr•q'E F¢4. NB. 20/5/ Po/mo Vi//age Groves, /3 N•.6,2//56-57 Palm Village Gorden Trod MS 22/5/ A/oiers Troct ME 34/52-53 Hermosa Saw's R.S. 19//9 --- Aecr5SO.R S' UAR 9r,.E.i Po./2 Ri VcR5/OE COVA Y, CAUF SAID public hearing will be held on Tuesday, November 4, 1986, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber at the Palm Desert Civic Center, 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. If you challenge the proposed actions in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in 'this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the planning commission '(or city council ) at, or prior to, the public hearing. PUBLISH: Palm Desert Post RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary October 24, 1986 Palm Desert Planning Commission i 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 October 21 , 1985 CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE CASE NO. PP/CUP 66-47 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by HARRY SCHMITZ for approval of a precise plan/conditional use permit for a seven unit senior citizen apartment project located on Santa Rosa Way, east of San Pascual Avenue, also known as: APN 627-121-020 ' . . NBf•u.E - 17 16 AVE i/Z6ryrrlet. "�r BR ra Co t Lo !0 r y IS P PJ ,40 Tl P9 3/ %O 3S SJ �. 31 39 1/ m 10 ,I 4 ^ n Ik e u rf ra l.ro P ``O 0.` _ .. 0 V 4 ) V 6 JI 1 �� 1 N S S P "N / o US' 4 O © ' 4 5j IAA le2e` 4 o (\�J . . (� I ^I / `I nl _ . 121 4 09 r rAA ®o/e-/oo rAA 09.002 .oz944 PP . Pa 6 Pc d� So •Y is 3c SB 90 a 9 /a //_ /P /3 `� /A n 3 4 7 O a —J—' cr�„rn�RO S . . _ ar e.•.ar evcrl<r 4 y BK vvc_ � vva w.s T T as Ava WAY r r ' 625 I. 0.rnA/eJr .[.• e...u+ 4. T. 3 11 Io r y+, y { /O• // `lO 6 �4 0.62 A[ 0.62.1[T azZA[ 0.9A[S i nr " Pa/ma V/Page Groves M621/56-57 Palm Village Gorden Tract 13 ME, 22151 A/olers Tract - A!E 34152-53 Hernosa Sates R.S. 1911E ASSE=t'S' 414 BY.627 Ro.12 Ri VeRS/DE COUNTY, CALIF SAID public hearing will be held on Tuesday, November 4, 1986, at 7:00 p.m, in the Council Chamber at the Palm Desert Civic Center, 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. If you challenge the proposed actions in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the planning commission (or city council ) at, or prior to, the public hearing. PUBLISH: Palm Desert Post RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary October 24, 1986 Palm Desert Planning Commission L' Lel L. 4 Cal ! \ a riu./L y T > V � ( N �O•a /Cylry w � Y I Y � bWNtiN O •) .,, e .II pm ° '. a G 00000000 � � \ U� � � p xI am0®',�,( n, mm � a mmb 4�0�mt 41 � NNU °o �oJ�`.j�r V H j a s 'I ,. /l9 � ' r i obbVdNry1' A I TRA O/B-OOz o _ h TRA 0 /6 -002 fs Ao 0 1 < < w Y. o 111 N . A A " 4 4 I a w •.« ' t . . "rRA oie oaz _ t MONTGUNERY' Nn ' LgiV f t u� P �y a R / m \ ,V n•OI D p O .. O I a TR4 0/8-00240 j u r n.. •I� •F+ sf.J •V .. i �.. _ WERMOSA c tAAF a I1. .,.♦ AwlAwl/A2.S.PZ o.e-uo n' N 1 w _�iar.T)_ 1 114, n iy _i TRA Old-079 i�et.JL ? ° M 4 ,'`' rl/fB-0/n ns. n •.la 11 .GD o .: Ye PVa. PVO AT o �PORTC3EA A,a,•., ,,, AVE 4 —ti9q O ' 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO(S) : PP 86-47 PROJECT: Seven unit senior apartment building. APPLICANT: Harry H. Schmitz, P.O. Box 3992, Palm Desert 92261-3992 Enclosed please find materials describing a project for which the following is being requested: Construction of a seven-unit senior apartment building on Santa Rosa between San Pascual and Portola. The attached data was prepared by the applicant and is being forwarded to you for comments and recommended conditions of approval . The city is interested in the probable impacts on the environment ( including land, air, water, minerals, flora, fauna, noise, objects of historical or aesthetic significance) and recommended conditions of approval based on your expertise and area of concern. Your comments and recommended conditions of approval must be received by this office prior to 4:30 p.m. October 23, 1986, in order to be discussed by the land division committee. The land division committee (comprised of director of community development, city building official , city engineer, fire marshal , and a representative of CVWD) will discuss the comments and recommended conditions of approval and will forward them to the planning commission through the staff report. Any information received by this office after the receipt deadline will not be discussed by the land division committee. Sincerely, -- --- ------------- RAMON A. DIAZ V DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT/PLANNING CS/tm Attachments PLEASE RETURN MAP WITH COMMENTS �� 3��VHF --- `�Dior�t.�r-1-��_��s - I I_o�. Sike- ate�_z., q 3(�� �. I_ _ -- - 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 CAMOBELC -�~~ -MIClIAEL" 'SCOT? 5336 OCANA AVE LAKEW00D• CA 90713 622200018=1 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA MG0 � GLASSMAN OLSON STUART B 73321 FRED WARING DR PALM DESERT* CA 92261 622200017-0 @tQ�or o:ff rax� IrDc!P9scDnoll 73-6111 FRED WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,DAUFORNIA 92260 RiCHARDS JdHN-_. RICHARDS BETTY =J 47772 DEL NORTE CT INDIOi, CA 92203 622200016-9 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 f RiCHARDS . RICHARDS BETTY J 47772 DEL NORTE CT INDIO, CA 92202 622200015-8 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 SCUDDER JEANIE E 73620 FRED MARINE DR PALM DESERT 'CA •92260 622200014-7 � s �> a [LET y i - 7&S10 FRED WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 ,Q�L,F• t r t o � f'Be9sl9�1 J« 1.�i2FiOci9:[RC_7UliN TO ;3Ic:1JU E=1R 00 cm as 1'Fdl.-t1 61-1 UI::`.+E.I'tT' C;n :�. c*j SENDER zN a SCUDDER IDHN E SCUDDER JEANI£ E v 73820 FRED HARING DR PALM. DESERT CA 92260 622200024-7 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 October 21 , 1985 CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE CASE NO. PP/CUP 86-47 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by HARRY SCHMITZ for approval of a precise plan/conditional use permit for a seven unit senior citizen apartment project located on Santa Rosa Way, east of San Pascual Avenue, also known as: It APN 627-121-020 Y. .r. 44rB Nn•u'E . AVE ai /6— ier ip.<fv.E ,.vn•N •v" r• •v/ uTIA / r BF •v G. ` Ge O e {. r-e-6 069 o _ "I nI v v 9ro P! ♦ P3 ,�o Zr - P9 !/ 'O !! JJ a Jr 39 I/ e i r d� 6 " 1 el + N ! o_ o I e(ly¢ < ¢ C. ,�.• 1 - I /wed I I I e rap a/e 00 rRA 0/8.0O1 © O.r/ee. �w 0I9x1 0.1, PP 21 1 P6 A6 50 •,!1 JI 36 h !B p0 6 9 ' /0 ft_ Q Io P r✓ANfA ROS <•' T .v e.•..'e r avr.s I e r WAY a•• • '� ~ Bl( � . . Pv6 Rs a Is eva ,. /! • li /0 IJ •�2`/� op tl s0 ; 0.62 pet 0.6P I<S 0.6PIet 0drpeI I' Q ' il.r I ' ,• ••Nf•'N'E PVu. A49. 20/5/ Pa/ma Village Gmvs _ /3 KE 2//56-57 Palm Village Gorden Tract Mg,22/5/ A/o/ers Troc.' ArS 34/52-53 Nermoso Sawts R.S. 19//9 - Ar;Essova nrA� er..ea; vs.l2 Ri FE'SIOE COUXor, CA-IF SAID public hearing will be held on Tuesday, November 4, 1986, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber at the Palm Desert Civic Center, 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. If you challenge the proposed actions In court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described In this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to, the planning commission (or city council ) at, or prior to, the public hearing. PUBLISH: Palm Desert Post RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary October 24, 1986 Palm Desert Planning Commission C'AM :3E>X ;].?_91 'Fi:3'1 :LO%:4/E36 2 2 +: 7&510'FRED WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 RETURN! TO SI=:MDER MOVED LEFT NO ADDRESS 1 m pW •!y/f p. it ' CWBELL MICHAEL SCOTT cv w` 5336 OCANA AVE g� U LAKENOaDr CA 90713 Si o _ . ., _...._ .. .... ...._ 622200018-1 ILLrIL,1L1;l,11111,'Il�lLld QD:ff Nunn r 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 October 21 , 1985 CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE CASE NO. PP/CUP 86-47 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by HARRY SCHMITZ for approval of a precise plan/conditional use permit for a seven unit senior citizen apartment project located on Santa Rosa Way, east of San Pascual Avenue, also known as: APN 627-121-020 L< . Pear -AVE. /7 16 fN 44 oar 21— . T Ep,t t B • r !♦ BF eO Le 4e ID I N r/ +e. rAp d6069 O ry q -I _ I I D +PJ 4 23 DO ZI M 3, !! !! 31 !9 I/ Oe `le � A Ik oU �p `0 Y r 4; + mA rezl - ® • rNA BOA P2 21 } 26 d>I` 11 •M JI 36 h 38 10 I � vc�a+ld$1—RO •• n.e.•1aJ everl1.7 Pee uv6 n r T I vv6 WAY �,. rB1/857 vA B / a " to 2 _. . . .. ._ . . .r ' Port P 4 /; y r :Or •r O.61 A[ 0.67 Art 0.621rt 0.9 Art r14 // .I 6 r, ••3 , ieN L•µ'E Pvu MS.. 20151 Pa/ma K11106 61a es N.E 21156-57 Palm 071oge Gorden 7rocl N6. 22151 Alaiers Troc, ME.34152-53 h'em,oso Saes R.S. 19118 A=50.9'_" A(A.P Br,Ell ?,;.12 PivcRsl0£ comir, CAi1P SAID public hearing will be held on Tuesday, November 4, 1986, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber at the Palm Desert Civic Center, 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. If you challenge the proposed actions in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the planning commission (or city council ) at, or prior to, the public hearing. PUBLISH: Palm Desert Post RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary October 24, 1986 Palm Desert Planning Commission Q. OCT21'96 - 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 CALIF • gyp'."E38103! Gull f TO /may • BENDER co c G I ATTEMPTED-NOT KNOWN � cn INSUFFICIENT ADDRESS M £ h0 SUCH NUMBER V - E�SS GERIIARD NAl'TE R � Nlt lk VACANT t(jaE HIL'DEGARD E REFUSED SANTA OSA NAY EXPIRED F WARD PAL04 DESERT CA 92260 ITIR C __ ... .. ._ .., 627121022-5 RTq N ' U 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 October 21 , 1985 CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE CASE NO. PP/CUP 86-47 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by HARRY SCHMITZ for approval of a precise plan/conditional use permit for a seven unit senior citizen apartment project located on Santa Rosa Way, east of San Pascual Avenue, also known as: APN 627-121-020 LT. �Z/ Tl • � (u I 4r A O 16 F •/T`Af �rAr f/f.' •%.. � - r•/l. r/u r�_ T >.fn roi.T T vu u vVrZ4 rl 6 +Vme�• r • [l/ r n1 6L nO Go T - l' La LO e 1J ♦ 1! ,9 ZS S9 !/ `O • !J J! r° Jl J9 I/ 0 •tr 6 A nl IX a O 4 O n ) ^1 ! 4I A NI J w 21,9 / o ©f 121 71.11 e.r on rPA ore r00 MA OiB-001 o,i/AI :.az=Ac. © A1 zz SI 4$ 16 Ae so •x JA 56 h Je 10 e 9 ro // rz /! ° /1 p 2 r ` lul N6r•9.V PV6r1<r Lr l a pK �:.Ni'fl-ROS Pv6 Ies T - T WAY V , ns Pv6 ,. 1857 `� /J •.t�J /0 T r t t Parl Perz Port M♦ IC l d // t {I -r• iO �.- I 0.62 A.S 0.61111 0.61 Avt O.lrAft ` ' 1k /I 2 ,•' :• 11 . 6 ' .r ✓ J � /2 n NIr'H'E PV4. MS.. 20/5/ POla,c Village 6rm,es 3 , /✓.62//56-57 Poln Village Gorden rroc/ M6, 2215/ Almers iroc; - ME 34/52-53 Hernosa soles F.S. AS_EC50.9'E A'A.' 9Y.E8• Pu'.l2 RWE?5/OE COUYi r, CALIF SAID public hearing will be held on Tuesday, November 4, 1986, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber at the Palm Desert Civic Center, 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. If you challenge the proposed actions in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing. described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the planning commission (or city council ) at, or prior to, the public hearing. PUBLISH: Palm Desert Post RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary October 24, 1986 Palm Desert Planning Commission REQUIRED PROPERTY OWNERS NOTIFICATION INFORMATION APPLICATIONS FOR: PARCEL MAPS TRACTS ZONE CHANGES CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS PUBLIC USE PERMITS 18. 30 PLOT PLANS, Requiring Environmental Assessments (Multi-family, Commercial, Industrial) VARIANCES SPECIFIC PLANS GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS AGRICULTURAL PRESERVES HOG RANCH PERMITS SURFACE MINING PERMITS The following items will be required at the time of filing of the above noted case applications: 1. TWO identical packages to be inserted in separate 9}" X 12}" manila envelopes. These envelopes shall indicate the case number and the word "labels, " and shall contain the following: (a) One typed set of gummed labels indicating all the property owners names and the mailing addresses that are within 300 foot radius of the exterior of their proposed project (this list shall be as- certained from the last equalized assessment roll) . (b) A photocopy of the aforementioned labels . (c) One label for the applicant/engineer. (d) One label for the owner. (e) FOR LAND DIVISION CASES ONLY: An 8}" X 11" reduction of the tentative map. 2 . Four typed sets of gummed labels of the applicant , owner, engineer, and representative with their mailing addresses . Do not include- duplicate sets where applicant and ower, etc. are the same . These should be in- serted in a letter sized envelope and stapled to the outside of one of the large manila envelopes mentioned in item 1 above. 3. Certification by the title company, engineer or surveyor that the above list is complete and accurate. The Tax Assessor's Office will not pre- pare or certify the property owner list (see reverse side for form) . 4. On a copy of your exhibit or tentative map show all parcels within 300 feet . On the map, print the names of all property owners within 3UM — feet as they are listed on the gummed labels. The above noted information may be obtained by contacting a title insurance company in the Riverside County area. D 83-55 RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT PROPERTY OWNERS CERTIFICATION it Debbie Reiss certify that on September 26, 1986 the attached property owners list was (month-day-year) prepared by FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY pursuant to application requirements furnished by the Riverside County Planning Department. Said list is a complete and true compilation of owner of the subject property and all other property owners within 300 feet of the property involved in the application and is baded upon the latest equalized assessment rolls . I further certify that the information filed is true and correct to the best of my knowledge; I understand that incorrect or erroneous information may be grounds for rejection or denial of the application. NAME: Debbie Reiss TITLE/ REGISTRATION Customer Service Representative ADDRESS : 3625 Fourteenth Street Riverside, California 92502 PHONE: (8-5) 714-787-1730 SIGNATURE: DATE: September 26, 1986 CASE PD 83-55 II , '[ �4DIOlEBALSAM -—`ELIZABETH--C SPECIAL DISTRICT MAILING•-LABEL i��Z�HERT (PRPAI3RA0) PAGE 1 ��2 3 _ l 5 PALM DESERT? CA 92260 PACIFIC PALISADAMONTO DS1 CA 90272 a '6 eL- — -- - T 622200012-5 '- 622200013-6 17 �\ 8' SCUDDER - .JOHN -. E - _ -RICHARDS - - - •JOHN- - -I-- - - -_ -- -- ;s .. SCUDDER JEANIE E t0.1 13820 -FRED WARING-DR RICHARDS BETTY J 12 PALM DESERT CA 92260 437i2-DEL-NORTE-CT „ �� 13 622200014-7 - INDIO? CA 92201 _ =.,2� �1. __ _ T - - --622200015-0- 15• ..RICHARDS JOHN I " �' 8 RICHARDS BETTY J OLASSMAN- MARC 17 47772 DEL NORTE C7 - OLSON STUART B _ _ _ 16 -- - 73321 FRED WARING DR _ - ;,,; l 9,_. _ _ INDIO,,._CA 92203 PALM..DESERT,�_CA 92261 18 p`--- 622200016-9 622200017-0 19 21 CAMPBELL MICHAEL SCOTT - -- _ - CAMPBELL KURT - G - - :2 - 2z 5336_OCANA -AVE CAMPBELL BONNIE 22 24' LAKEWCODv_CA_.—_._ 90713 20116 E STATE-RD` 23U CERRITOS♦ CA 90701 21 25 622200018-1 26 _ - 622200019-2 25 _ 27. J...MANAGEMENT_.INC TATCHELL--. 26 28 C/O C M CARR P 0 BOX 53 JOSEPN W 27 zs P O BOX 11976 - REDONDO BEACH♦ CA 90277� zs �17.cr"MFfd. o���,� 6273220I3=0 r v- 32 _ _ 32 TOTAL RECORDS PRINTED 30 _- 33 35` ' .T0T A L.-L A B E LS._P.R I N T E D 29 - - - - - - _ - Im 36 _ 38 37 - - - _ 37 36 __ 36 39 41 - _ - __ _ - _ .. .11 12 12 131- /3 1/ 11 9 /8 16 47' 10 - 16 p 50 - _ 50 ti 51[_- _ 51 52 - - 52 53 53 51 - - •54 8 557 55 f 56- - _ 56 S 57 - .--.... - - T + ._ 57 56 58 q =59 60 60 61 61 62 - - 62 63 C'_ - _ -_ - _.-. _ _ - -__ T_--- 163 ._ 1 PPPPPPPPPPP RRRRRRRRRRR ,PPPPPPPPPPP _ AAAAAAAAAA SSSSSSSSSS- 3333333333 - 555555555555 LL •' 2 _ PPPPP,PPPPPPP- RRRRRRRRRRRR- PPP..P.P.P.PP.PP.PP_ AAAAAAAAAAAA_ SSSSSSSSSSSS__ 333332333333_ 555555555555_.LL__ 2 3� .PP. PP—.RR— RR-PP—PP-AA--AA--SS, _ _ _-SS-33. _ _ _ _33.- -55 _.LL--_ _ � _ _ _3 - 4 PP PP RR RR PP PP AA AA SS 33 55 LL 4 ; 5 PP PP RR RR PP PP -AA AA SSS 33 55 LL 5 6 PPPPPPPPPPPP- RRRRRRRRRRRR_ PPPPPPPPPPPP AAAAAAAAAAAA. __SSSSSSSSS-___. __ . - 3333_ 555555555_^___ LL_ 6 7•• . _ PPPPPPPPPPP—RRRRRRRRRRR_ _.PPPPPPPPPPP—AAAAAAAAAAAA—SSSSSSSSS- 3333—.5555555555—LL - - 17 6 PP RR RR PP AA .AA SSS 33 55 . _ LL 6 9 PP RR RR PP - - - - .AA- - AA SS- 33 - - - 55--LL - - - - ---- -- - _9 0 PP.—RR RR—PP AA—AA-SS—SS-33--33-55-LL 10 v �- _ PP RR RRPP AA AA-SSSSSSSSSSSS-333333333333.-555555555555-LLLLLLLLLLLL 11 12 PP RR RR- PP _.AA AA SSSSSSSSSS 3333333333 - 55555555555 LLLLLLLLLLLL 12 .13 4 14 16 /111111/11 2222222222 00000000 11 AAAAAAAAAA ,6 17 JJJJJJJJJJ 222222222222 0000000000 - 111 - AAAAAAAAAAAA .17 6 JJ .22_ 22-00 0000 1111 AA AA 6 9� - JJ 22-00-00-00-11 AA AA 20 JJ 22 00 _00. .00 li. _ AA AA 2° 21 JJ 22. 00 OG - 00 - 11 AAAAAAAAAAAA 21 22 JJ 22_-00-00_00 11 AAAAAAAAAAAA___. _22 , 23l . _ _ JJ ._____-_ ��__-22- -- -00-00 00 11 AA _AA —_`:23 24 JJ JJ. 22. 0000 00 11 AA AA 24 25 JJ JJ 22 000, 00. 11.- - AA AA .25 zs JJJJJJJJ 222222222222,_00000.000.00—1111111111— AA AA 26 27 -_ JJJJJJ 222222222222—0000000-0 1111111111 _ AA AA -�27 23- 26 29 n ' 30 A END. _JOB-JOB -1. 001_003_MAS7FR-141120.02XDXP1719104F_RGDM_GPNS +02.45_PM_29_SEP_86_PRINTERl_H158-END-.A* 30 � 3,' *A-.END-JOB-201-PRPAS35L-1. 001_001_MASTER—14112002XDXP1719104F-RGGM-OPNS-E.02+45-PM_29-SEP-86-PRINTERI-H158-END-AQ�31 32� A END JCB 201 .PRPAS35L 1 001 001 MASTER. -.14112002XDXP1719104F ROOM GPNS. .8+02+45. PM 29 SEP 86 PRINTERI H156 END Aa 32 J3 <A END _JOB . 201 PRPAS35L _1..__ 001 001 .MASTER. .- ._14112002XDXP1719104F RCGM GPNS 8.02.45 .PM 29 SE'P .86 PRINTERI H158- - END . A* 34 *A.- END-JOB_201._P _PA.S35.L._1. 001_001_MAST- R_�14112002XDXP1719104F_RGOM_OPNS-._8+02.45_.PM_29_SEP_86_.PRINTERl_H158_,..END-A* 14 O 35r - =A.-END.-JGB-201_PR PAS35L._1 001-001-MA STER—.14112002XDXP1719104F-RGOM,-GPNS.-8+02.-45-PM_29-SEP_86_P-RINTERI-H158-END-A4�35 � 36 36 37 37 39f 139 v 40.__ 40 41 - - - _ - - - _ _ _ _ _ •41 i3�_.._ _ 43 1 44 µ 45 .__ .4$ - i7L-_ _-_-'— J47 V 46 46 49 - _ - - --- _. _ - _ . ._ .. -..� - - - ,49 51 _ 51 52 _ 52 53 ` 54 54 O 8 551 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 55 ( 56 56 S 57 __57 56 _ 56 4 59L _ - 59 ,O a 60 60 61 . 61 62 _ _ 62 O 63' 63 10' -0 24' -0' 16. -0' 24'-0' 10'-0 SIDEYARD NEW 3' RETAINING WALL UNDER TSIDEYARD S' GARDEN WALL aC 84' -0 ic s a.. t-o*-rasa V PLA EXISTING u POWER w c m POLE ? o N TABLE a. uw ti Q LEGAL DESCRIPTION :00190 Ct O p U :001A C1 :QwA C1 F- :001lITs ct LOT 28 PALM VILLAGE GARDEN TRACT W o_ U N T # 4 U N I #S . uj ;to a MB 21/S6&S7 RIVERSIDE. COUNTY ,,, Z G ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 627-121-020-3 z z < W (L a cc :3W AQ :30 A4 :30NTs AQ ~' W N NA -- - - - - - - - - - - Z Z i O o n :04t0 At :00 Al :03 At �- ° 'S "' UNIT #3 UN11 #6 z / l ' W CONCRETE ILE o I o ROOFING �- ( ► 1 ( " 12 b;- n ( c� IL 4rTYp EXTERIOR EMENT i x PLASTER AT WALLS. W y FASCIA A SOFFIT W Ir . JOB 8615 o z 1 73-810 M 4 1 J y Uh X V ( ci p Ln 73-810 SANTA ROSA WAY ELEVATION SCALE : 1/8" = 1' -0' cD o g C7 E H z UNIT #2 UN11 #7 z MAIL BOXS _ z - M _ i < F— l!1LD , ` in U1 0 x < - z x in -- w 4 < W 24' -0' W z W ~b'-0' 2'^6' 15'-b' � PLANTING � V CL _ 4 0 rA, x .>;. . __ •• SPA z lU • F-- N N iv UNIT # 1 ROOF LINE F- ui O` O .. IL _ � U1r) N !� Q W i i CL BAT ,� � �° LJ t �+ ICNIt � Cl n ABLE -J N 0 Q D` Z TRASH • COVERED PAT I0 AREA w - .°Do ACTIVE -- --' _ a Ln N � AREA 4, R- F- 0*_ a cI W A 1-1 LJ M F-4 ­1 • • \\ LAUNDRY Z ZSPA EQUIP. rj X w M tn O O w Z m lJ_. -- O W PASS I V E N $ _-- ----------.— ' ui a ~ AREA FOOD COUNTER r a CAS lU O Q -.O ® c o. CIO WAT �t s PARK 0 CARPORT �� CARPORT i D.W. ��} ; r FOR 7 CARS or 1 " IL J KITCHEN J pp O 2 • Y -- — —-- —— — — ——— � REF. Y r o W -- _ �• .-. 1p SHELF AND POLE - r - - - - - ----J 2 tIn 1-4 _ O O V o . v► F Z ` Q Q o O o ---- � mow.a...y..w ..w•a•o — - w"and ooarV+of reAru ans a+..wa 10'-10' 2' -8' 10'-6' beh w 0.,r ow` e�"of r- I ® wrw+o.ow•u�.a .r wri w ..rwa o'sv r:•.•. aa-ssrcti ru.s • •• law . .. raga b mm.M W.e>•e.r w. cuwew+ orwvr of.q �\ UNIT # 1 TYPICAL SCALE 1/40 = 1'-0' it8' 20'- —_— 2S'-6' 20'-0' 1O•-0' DRIVEWAY ,nr-4 5 A N T A R 0 S A W A Y Q z z 10' -0• 24' -0' 16'-0' 24'-0' 10' -0' SIDEYARD NEW 3' RETAINING HALL UNDER SIDEYARD C, S' GARDEN HALL 84'-0 • cc c I -All — EXISTING POWER W o cc r POLE z G W I HORSESHOE PIT O.TOlM1A.1 - - - -'1•- — —— — — —— - -- - r'- - --- -- - r.T= -- _ D:02 Al DtO At t + MOWS Al N? LEGAL DESCRIPTION t � � i• y Dt00190 C1 I t• Q a � - c=1�o�a I LOT 28 PALM VILLAGE GARDEN TRACT 4 I W M8 21/56i57 . RIVERSIDE. COUNTY D:OOINTS C1 W I _ ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 627-121-020-3 ` 1 Z WJAt I { r ; 0:30 A2 D:30NTS AZ Ln Z W I I ` f f i cr_ I k z CL D t 0400 # Q ch z CONCRETE TILE I ! '• ' I ROOFING r. s t 4 r or IL12 EXTERIOR CEMENT f I II It (t X PLASTER AT HALLS, W ` FASCIA AND SOFFIT I I I 6 I I LJ • c� I a .__l._ ; JOB # 8615 73-810 Z t ( ` Ln • 1 -- , i` l � � � I W U1 73-810 SANTA ROSA WAY ELEVATION SCALE : 1/80 = 1'-0• c� t aE H , , ` " I 0 I I� z , MAIL'BOXS ; i, ~' F- t t < F- Ul , } -<• is Ln x x 1L I < w 24'-0' v 6'-0• 2'-6' ISO-6' J v , F— l V l\l cr 0` N ROOF LINE o F— L 0` O to J v I ; __ *-- Q L I I --1 .o I I T RASH O CL BAT s - 1—, J _ Ln Q N ICNIC I t AREA rn € I i ABLE I x J N - - E ' COVERE :PAT I 0 1 . o C i---------- I L ,O ACTIVE _ t t SPA O` N AREA __ ____r_.. I I EQUIP. F- 0` Q I o t t t z zN rn tn 0 o -- — I ' •� •r t I I Z m L - o�PASS I VE N L N CARPORT t r > = O -� A ROE A Em ---*- FOOD COUNTER o I I Lu • Q -O PARKINGor CARPORT i 0RL IN � . D.W. 1�1 H ." •, t , - — Z I t 7 CARS I IL 0 L �:�- 1 i Z KITCHEN .. V < L -- -�-- - --- --- - J REF. `i r x w - a - -T ---J 3 0 < • - U) II SHELF AND POLE — � � N V1 ,O Z t c - _ Z Q I a of aw• ofaM Yid•"n 10'—10• 2'_8' 10'—6' •o be"No o""WOW "°�"►dram••+ eap�•�t a�tM�l. a w•aw"ap% a �r M aru pall••o. wo f•a/ e .ter an no me•r Kati rl•r a a• • as rave so go-•ace N aka av b rr a•Maw.aI 24' -0' NO 0 i to -- I UNIT # 1 TYPICAL SCALE 1/40 = l' 8' 20' 25'-6' _ 20'-0' 10'-0• DRIVEWAY S A N T A R 0 S A W A Y Z z cr r 10' -0' 24' •-0• ! 16'-0• ! 24' -0• t 10'-0• 1 51DEYARD ;IDEYARD • h NEW 3' RETAINING `MALL UNDER - ti • 5' GARDEN WALL i 11 • co co 84' -0 Ln PLANT I NG _ _. EXISTING a x � �� i ! POWER W o f t _.� i POLE Z i ►— 4 1 is K E 5HGE FIT I ! �A r5,• _ CL J1 67 cN�. �,vas -7v, .?�� -f� �K_. aG f arosa>Ae1 t• +�- ji r - 0:03 At 1 D'02 Al r , t Di OW75 Al �1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION } 0:061 a 1 { D:io n LOT 28 PALM VILLAGE GARDEN TRACT �,_ 1 J 1 d T #4 '�� U N 1 i� #5 { a W D:oo1NTS cu M8 21J56&57 . RIVERSIDE. COUNTY $ cn ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 627-121-020-3 z { { { { ~ Aco t• ;, f �., x D:30Y0 A2 r—, 4 1 i ` I 0:30 A2 S I ► __ 0:30NT5 A2 Lt'I � ^• i z � 1._ �, _ `j a Y CONCRETE TILE ROOFING 1L r5 a 12 �� r---•�� ! 41 TYP C EXTERIOR CEMENT { y ( x •. PLASTER AT WALLS. ! z f ! { I FASCIA SOFFIT - --- I { i • LL: AND ! < aL 73-810UJ Y { • �` , ' µ j i i Z x rI I j ! -j f 1 • cr 73-810 SANTA RJSA WAY ELEVATION � SCALE : 1/8 - 1 -0 fi� 1 � ++i C I i s CD � r- { , { 8E1�-H ' j z - c I 1 z Pks !! o x < + (� — 1 l � z X uj �' - W 6'-0• 2'-6' 15'-6• j { x {Y ANT I NC ./ I• 5PA z .� Ul I I i I f a z z -� , T # , 2-24 009 ? r:`• { �— RO iF LINE - 3 � A A61L-VER_ WATTLE (ACACIA jecoreen5 JeaJbat0. )12-15cJp�. �x j ' { -_ -- f� --� 2 Lf') n Oj ILI — --- p a ► WATAL PLUM CCAE►SS4 9rwdli��Or0.1 19w�. 21 o,G. a i • �ii i f , i- T A T l / , { RASH D t Q 1 : z ; �I 4AZ N � (GA2AIJIA w,��s�ww. ycE�ov�) 9 o,a Z � �_•� �, r; '?': �' CNIC ' A U - ! r �1 i ABLE y C)WA¢a OLEANDER (uETL1uh o�<whder) 55,I,Ca 4L•oo.G. ` t . . N { CcvEIq � T (� �. , 07 1 A T I VE 1 o ` Max1CAN FAN PALM (WASNINtTONIA w61►s+A� 43-8 N., k va. r re_ � L, , ,j 1� I 1 �J ��J S y I , • t SPA � i _ _._ _ _ _ AZTEIL L ( - 1 i_A141DRY AREA ! € E ,r VINE QEAUMeNTLA c�ra•����ra\) ya1. f 'a � ! 1 { { t :� EQUIP. i f-- CT <i I 4 J �;of N M EU2oPEAN FAN ALMS 1-Ij5 9��,� oe t { z P �NAMNEloPS hu,«.�:s) 1 of. '---y { 1 i - _ _ . .. � V' cc K Q '+, ►gq��, o I i { a { ATE _ Z n LL_ ^. CV P ! N LA14TANA LAuTANq moNte�L�ers s IAACA 14., 1 ',1 2Ait.� ; , r � � ) 1V � f �._____r r o � � CARPORT AREA 1 FOOD COUNTER r !/ ' I i ! '" W O ARK I 1 G D.W. { H� : I { CARPORT � G �1� � � �� 7 .fit` . _")�� { -1 CARS cl KITCHEN N; ;� z 7r o• z J REF 1 J _ • SHELF AND POLE t 1 m ' N CV cc , — -- LL n,. _. N to l{ } W c � to 1 z N > _ ' \ O c jc r ¢n.rww ow ocamd ...w.a a..,oe s.. aac.owcti rrr be _.!�.. •• �...��.s• •• . . . tw Y ro to•.ofc• rcAra•.O•D tw• D of 24 -o A 24 6s eo ? _...__._1 - I ! UNIT # 1 TYPICAL SALE : 1/4 _ 1 -o . _ e• -6• 20•-o• 25•-6• 20•-o• 10•-o• ! ' I DRIVEWAY N S A N T A R 0 S A W A Y z z 24' -V• 16' -0• 24' -0• 10'-0• SIDEYARL ! NE f 2' RF.YAI!;ir10 51A1_L UNDER _ SJDEYARD WALL TYPE LEGEND ABBREVIATIONS INDEX OF DRAWINGS ► 5' GARDEN WALL � i . _ � i 84 0 PLANTING _ _ �' ALUM ALUMINUM SHEET 1 THIS SHEET t POWER 2xb STUDS @ 24" O . C . W/ R-19 Y __. BATTS GYP . BD . GYPSUM BOARD ' m o R o POLE o SHEET 2 FOUNDATION PLAN o � HORSESHOE PIT H. C . HOLLOW CORE ROOF AND FRAMING --� a W �R ►U 2x4 STUDS @ ib" O . C . W/ NO MET METAL PLAN r. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ Uj A:X At INSULATION PLY . PLYWOOD SHEET 3 SECTIONS AND DETAILS � � ( • . I i PNT PAINT SHEET 4 FLOOR PLAN G I ( z 2x6 STUDS @ 16" O . C. W/ NO PR PAIR I ( I J A:A000 N INSULATION SHEET 5 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS oI < S . C . SOLID CORE !` v DBL . 2X4 STUD WALL W/1/2" STN STAIN GRADE UNIT # 4 i I UNIT #S i cc SOUND ATTENUATION BOARD TYP . TYPICAL -- --- BETWEEN AND R- 11 INSULATION A=s,TE.o AL IN STUD SPACES TEMP TEMPERED ( a A:"I At cc MOGINrs Al VAR VAR I ES A*02P A3 _ v ! ( v x A:o10io AL WD WOODS ANY SPECIAL WALLS NOT LISTED ON THIS SCHEDULE SHALL 00 I a° BE NOTED AT EACH WALL ON PLANS a I L "( 0 A:TJTL.AI o1 GENERAL NO TES I I z A • �� •• � ( ( UNIT #6 � ' 1 ~ •• 1 . ALL ELECTRICAL OUTLETS/RECEPTACLES LOCATED ON 7 . ALL EXHAUST FANS AND FAN SYSTEMS SHALL HAVE UNIT #, i ( I AN EXTERIOR WALL SHALL BE GASKETED . BACKDRAFT DAMPERS . 6 2 . ALL SHOWERHEADS , LAVATORY FAUCETS AND SINK ( ?(ZD ( �I 8. THERMOSTATS SHALL BE TWO—STAGE , NIGHT SETBACK ( (LFAUCETS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH FLOW CONTROLDEVICES TO LIMIT TOTAL FLOW TO A MAXIMUM OFTYPE . I } THREE GALLONS PER MINUTE . NO SHOWERHEAD , FAUCET , ETC . SHALL BE INSTALLED UNLESS SAMPLES 9 . ALL GLAZING WITHIN 18" OF THE FLOOR , AND ALL HAVE BEEN TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TEST GLAZING ADJACENT TO SWINGING DOORS SHALL BE PROCEEDURES DESCRIBED IN SEC . 1603 OF THE TEMPERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH UBC CHAPTER 54, 01 JO t8615 APPLIANCE EFFICIENCY REGULATIONS AND THE SECTION 5406 . MANUFACTURER HAS CERTIFIED TO THE COMMISSION ( ! THAT THE WATER FLOW RATE DOES NOT EXCEED THE i �- -�- — -- -- - -� ABOVE VALUES . 10 . ALL ROOFING MATERIAL SHALL BE OF CLASS A CONSTRUCTION ( i 11 . INSTALL HORIZONTAL BLOCKING IN ALL WALLS: t BENCH � I 3 . ALL EXTERIOR DOORS AND WINDOWS SHALL BE FULLY MINI MUM 3 AT EACH CORNER AND 2 AT EACH SIDE OF UNIT # UNIT #7 I WEATHERSTRIPPED TO LIMIT INFILTRATION. ALL OPENING IN WALL . + MAIL-BOXS i MANUFACTURED WINDOWS AND SLIDING GLASS DOORS I _ SHALL MEET THE INFILTRATION STANDARDS OF THE 7 12 . ANY OPENINGS IN NON—BEARING WALLS LESS THAN 4' -0" 1972 AMER I CAN NATIONAL STANDARDS INSTITUTE �' _ i WIDE SHALL HAVE DBL . 2x4 HEADER LAID ON EDGE . i _ vt A . S . T . M. 2_83-73 WITH A PRESSURE DIFFERENTIAL-_ ��_ Y OF 1 . 57 LBS . PER SQUARE FOOT AND SHALL BE ` I • _ .ter• CERTIFIED AND LABELED . 13 . INSTALL NON—REMOVABLE BACK—FLOW DEVICES ON ALL EXTERIOR HOSE BIBS PER UPC SECTION 1003. LP F_ o Z i v _ _ __ W 4 . UPON COMPLETION OF INSULATION INSTALLATION , " _ ' ___ ' A CARD CERTIFYING THAT THE INSULATION HAS 14. � APPLIANCES SHA�LLHAVEAN INTERMITTENT ( z . � . ! L PLANTINGj/BEEN INSTALLED IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE IGNILIGHT IS PERMITTED - REQUIREMENTS OF THE ENERGY REGULATIONS SHALL BE COMPLETED AND EXECUTED BY THE INSULATION ! s ; �,�.-'' ;/ ' SPA z Ln CL Q APPLICATOR AND THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR . 15 . EXTERIOR JOINTS AROUND DOORS AND WINDOWS , JOINTS I ---' < lU Q THIS INSULATION COMPLIANCE CARD SHALL BE BETWEEN SOLE PLATE AND CONCRETE SLAB , AND BETWEEN R ' / 0_ ~ POSTED AT A CONSPICUOUS LOCATION WITHIN THE EXTERIOR WALL PANELS SHALL BE CAULKED TO LIMIT _ UNIT # 1 I ROOF LINE ( z Z Q f DWELLING . INFILTRATION. ALSO CAULK ALL OPENINGS IN EX'I ERNAL Y I -- -- _ _ __ _ _ W P') WALLS OR CEILINGS FOR PLUMBING, ELECTRICAL OR GAS I WROGHT IRON J N Z Z GATE a GRILL r I Q �--y �N N � -� 5 . AIR CONDITIONING DUCTS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED . LINES . PLASTERED CONC.BLK. ( ! - I POOL I TRASH �-- �- a O 01 INSTALLED AND INSULATED ACCORDING TO THE _ I WALL t 16050.PILLASTER BATH REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTER 10 OF THE 1976 UNIFORM ( _ I I AREA W ►.� ti O� lL MECHANICAL CODE . 16. ADDRESS NUMERIALS SHALL BE A MINIMUM 5 HIGH ON A I I i • ui CONTRASTING BACKGROUND. I O I _ M i CL' � 0 6 . WATER HEATER SHALL HAVE AN EXTERNAL INSULATION % ( I . i ., 0 p00 BLANKET WITH MINIMUM R=12 ; HOT WATER INLET AND 17 . SUBMIT CERTIFICATE TO BUILDING OFFICIAL PRIOR TO FRAME I —� _�---� � (P i � I Z • O OUTLET PIPES SHALL BE EXTERNALLY WRAPPED WITH I SPA Q Z Z LEI (\I INSPECTION. THAT ALL STEEL COLUMN WELDING HAS BEEN I I LAUNDRY EQUIP: Ld R=3 INSULATION FOR FIRST FIVE FEET IN hi PERFORMED BY A CERTIFIED WELDER. ( --- TYP.6• HIGH - I -i z V1 �' V•J `O UNCONDITIONED SPACE . o Q �. CONC. CURB GAS F_ •o I I. - ( I WATER Q_ 0 COVERED W z 10` PARKING 2 F— U) _,j i ! OVERED I •--+ O Q `O = i fiARitING ( I Ln x ( PARKING I I O ( f V7 E F / a ? CARS . _ -r-- _.__ 3 1/20 CONL* o s 6 a PARKING SURFACE . 10 + AND DRIVEWAY Ln0. m 6 <� 1 ♦ O� ►i V L' o v aO _J ? L ui \ e, 0 „_• 33 Q "a"��r /M vc1H,C and~wot be wow as" won 6.0w swourAw WM•r W„0 O•ugpti,NY N" be as ■ ■• .M114.On M Im My o.,�.Ky vyn to f fO J , I LEGAL DESCRIPTION i I 8' -b' 20'-00 +_ __— 25'-6• I_ 20' -0• 10'-0• --r�`- •-�------- LOT Z! PAUI VILLAGE GARDEN TRACT DRIVEWAY IN 21/S64V . RIVERSIDE COUNTY 7 3- 8 1 0 S A N T A R 0 S A W A Y ASSESSORS PARCEL No. 627-121-020-3 N O NORTH Z Z D cr m co • z sz-s7-l+k c 64'-0' `O W • _Q• —Q Z v 24'-0' 16'-0• 24'-0• I W • ui A:401000 Al ►- A:44 AS A:40KTS At p I I I i ,� m i 1 I I 1 I Q I 3 I I 3 I N i (\. 0 I E I I I Z I J Z I a A:461000 Cl I I I I I J I v I A:10 Cl I i I i I i W m - J i m ,_ J o _j 1 i 1 I J J J as Q A:717LAt D1 a- 1 I I I U i LL ! I J r i i 1 I I i I J 9 a. I 3 i I I I i ui i P i I I TYPICAL SLAB ON GRADE I W/2000 psi CONCRETE I 1 { U) i 2 ( I 2 1 3 i I 3 _ L-- _.. — ---� —————— _— —.....-- _ w � j � JOB #8615 0< j J I ( I 0_W —W W j I I PROVIDE _.,., I I j I i I G U.POSITIVE i c c\jI I 1 TYPICAL SLAB ON GRADE I I DRAINAGE �i i �— � -��I ( y o u J N i 3 W/2000 psi CONCRETE I I W/PLYWOOC i p i I to CRICKET ''" Asti iv I i I N I BOTH SIDES o i I I J i i I U)31 I 1 I 1 z J N I I 1 Ii 3 I J I -J F— I I I 3 i I J aLd Z J i I 002 JW c3l 6x6 POST W/ ' ri �; JI v bxb POST W/ 0 OC866 i BASE M i !� ° I 2_OL 12 z Z Q �1. N I ' -o Q N ►'7 i - _ I x '�� J _ - I I ;� i I I 6x12 I I O f-- o, p a I I 1 o I O • , O� lt, V I SLOPE I J I 1: 15 i L 3 J I � I 1 I I I ,Nr I I o I z (Y � � Q l 3 I I 6 I I J I Q O UI O u N L_ 7,7_ - --� r.- --- f - - - - - .� ._ - --( -_ - - - J - N ---- i J � N � , o 24'-ow 1 i I O I 11J I z r_ Lu � N z cy 0 w U Lu '0 ---- ---� 0 6 X I I x Ut v Nac Ll- Ili _ — _ 2 3/4-L 7'.(p!/.�" 5=9�,! 2 3/4' 4• STEEL TUBE W COLUMN Q N Q Q o , EACH IDEYP.I � r� NOTE : PRIOR TO FOUNDATION s Cl s z z i ~ �' N -' INSPECTION, SUBMIT o 3 , 3 co � Q 4 LETTER TO CITY ENGR . � x x O C� Q_ Q -O tl r­ Ul Q_ 3 CERTIFYING THAT r _ r v 6x12 (4) COMPLIES FOR BUILDING PAD HEIGHT a NOTE : ROOF COMPLIES W/APPROVED TYP. FOR 121 STRUCTURE AT 40 STEEL TUBE _ _ r,,, GRADING PLAN. 6x12 bxla PITCHED AREA COLUMN tTYP. SHALL BE TRUSSED . 3 L L_! 43 / ° "-o 4' STEEL TUBE SEE DESIGN CALCS COLUMN tTYP. 3 AND LAY-OUT BY SUPPLIER . 'O ' t OD 13'-8' 36'-4' 13'-8' 3 O. O 3 I 0• .., 63'-S' I1 V e V aD J W o � c Thm Ordw m am ti V"Prod M'MO ooprgrn d �Z.w0~OW fft +et FOUNDATION PLAN SCALE: 1/6'=1'-0• ROOF PLAN AND FRAMING SCALE: 1/B•-1'-O' go to go MAC* -'CIWW PrW so ~ N N O O Z Z Q m 7/8" P . C . PLASTER 0/ MTL . LATH 8 5 1/2• SQ.xl/4' PLATE SEE FINISH PAPER AND 3/8'CDX PLYWOOD SHEATHING MELDED TO COLUMN • 2 - 3/4.OM.B. EACH LEG OF SCHEDULE COL. CAP W/ PLATE WASHERS 6x12 BEAN 2x6 STUDS @ 24" 0 . C . W/ C� ON OPP. SIDE R-19 BATT INSULATION 1.-1.-1..� r .1 � CODE APPROVED 4L J1 _ WEEP SCREED. 2xb PRESSURE TREATED SILL W/ 5/8' W z DIA . X 10 " LONG ANCHOR BOLTS @ 48' O MIN . 2 PER SILL 8 MAX 12' FROM END cm7 W 4 -3/406M.B. 5 i/2•50. x 3fB• PLATE I WELDED TO 4'TUBE COL. • '' ui 6x 12 BEAM L FIN . F L R DIN me4' CONCRETE SLAB 8 HITTER CUT EACH REINFORCED W/ 6-6 . BEAN TO BEAM ° FIN . GRADE # 1 Ox#10 WWM Q 6x12 BEAN . z I O • 2' SAND BED OVER ~ U 6 MIL VI5QUEEN ( 10•x 6•x 1/4• PLATE VAPOR BARRIER Q O - ro O O WELDED TO COL. CAP � EACH WAY f #4 CONT . REBAR , c B'x6' x1/4' PLATE TOP AND BOTTOM WELDED TO COL. CAP EA. SIDE OF BEAM 2 - 3/40R+M.B. EACH LEG OF a MA19 C4 COL. CAP W/ PLATE WASHERS r 40STEEL TUBE COLUMN 1'-0 ON OPP. SIDE co 0 40 STEEL TUBE COLUMN x O m O a p=A1. Ct COLUMN CAPITAL 1 " = 1 ' — 0 5 COLUMN CAPITAL 1 " = 1 ' — 0 3 FOOTING DETAIL z O #4 CONTINUOUS REBAR I N04 PROPERTY LINE WHERE PLUMB AND BRACE COLUMN 4•STEEL TUBE COLUMN w z TOP COURSE 8 MID-HEIGHT . CCURS PRIOR TO POURING OF FTG. 1/2' SOUND ATTENUA- — 2x STUDS @ 24 0/C a TION BOARD (GEORGIA- PACIFIC OR EQUAL) 2-LAYER5 5/8' GYP . BD . E. S . cn p:A14 os PLASTERED _ z R-11 BATT INSULATION 2x PRESSURE TREATED SILL W/ 5/8' 6x6x 16 CONCRETE z 0 IN BOTH STUD SPACES. BLOCK I DIA ANCHOR BOLTS @ 48 0/C : MIN 2 PER SILL , MAX 12' FROM END ._ I I 3 1/2' CONCRETE DRIVE ` (USE 10d POWER SHOTS @ 320 O/C #4 VERTICAL REBAR @ w _j 32" O. C . a I I @ NON-BEARING WALLS) oiA17 cs I 111 3 . FINISH GRADE ►i ar 2 I' I -� 3 1 /2' CONCRETE SLAB W/ WATERPROOF WHERE LLJ o 0 :0 N I I 6x6, #10x#10 WWM GRADE IS HIGHER THAN EMBED COLUMN 24' INTO o JOB #8615 i M FOOTING 2' SAND BED 0/ 6 MIL OPPOSIT SIDE . I I VISDUEEN VAPOR BARRIER at=�� f1 B'x8' BASE PLATE WELDED s TO COLUMN .:so .1 OCONCRETE FOOTING L. N W/ #4 REBAR CENTERED - 6 #4 CONT . REBAR UNDER WALL NOTE : MOVE FOOTING 1. -o• TOP AND BOTTOM 6" 6" 6" OVER AS SHOWN BY ---- DOTTED LINES WHEN A:TMA3 01 1 • —6 w WALL IS NEXT PROPERTY LINE 1 -6• GARDEN WALL SECTION 13i4 ~ = 1 � -0 161CARP-ORT COL . FOOTING 1 " - 1 ' - 0 4 INTERIOR FOOTING 1 " = 1 ' — 0 2 Z W j --- - 5/8• COX PLYWOOD SHEATHING o� W/ 10d NAILS / Q % 6'o.c. FIELD O ELN 4T / 12'o.c. EDGE Q .-4 O• I Z/ I— Z ~ CONCRETE ROOF TILE W LLJ .� OVER 2-LAYERS 30B FELT N 12 _ Ln _ _ CEILING INSULATION SHALL BE Q. ( Q� .3.-Ow 4 TYPICAL f \��, R-3B BAT T5 SEE TRUSS SUPP I R FOR DESIGN CALCULATIONS A4D DETAILED OL �C Q CONSTRUCTION OUT Ln O (V -�;�, 0 z ZW N a � p OF PLATE Ln � W . U1 ocLl� 1Ut-) � Oo bxb MDR. Q Z F-- ::) < . WALLS AND CEILING SMALL BE u EXTERIOR CEMENT 5/8' GYP.BD. PLASTER FASCIA. EAVE AND WALL �- EXTERIOR WALLS SMALL BE 2x6 c=a STUDS f 24'o.c. W/ R-19 BATT W INSULATION TYPICALcl r W io ALL EXTERIOR WALLS SHALL BE SHEATHED 3 1/20 CONCRETE SLAB ON GRADE - - - - 1 3/4' INSULATED W/ 3/8' COX PLYWOOD METAL DOOR W/ Bd NAILS 0 6•o.c EDGE AND FIELD vI WEATHER STRIPPING co cl a 0' THRESHOLD SHALL NOT O� UJ ;n BE HIGHER THAN 1/2' � I AND EXTERIOR SLAB Z V o SHALL NOT SLOPE V MORE THAN 1:15 FINISH FLOOR w -:�. �� TAw any ANpow My•M m OPP soft p0 V M Iaifl W•11•/w•t •� �J toow NOTE : ATTIC AREA SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH FIRE SPRINKLERS . '' ' -» s ;r-. s..y►•b= a�rr ocwwaa vetiw a ww mw.wnoww•of ow TYPICAL BUILDING SECTION SCALE : 1/2* 1'-0' N N 4 O �i z z Q m CENTER LINE OF PARTY WALL OR EXTERIOR FACE OF END UNIT � 5'-11 1/4' lp e� --------------- sQ-s7-sue 64*- TUB R ;r TUBA �_ 0 ►'s SHOWER . SHOWER / \ w ACTIVE \ I z 24'-0' op 16'-0' 24'-0• _ BATH AREA AC UNIT - SEE SITE PLAN �i \ emu W O FOR EXACT LOCATION d:0'2A�0Al r•— - - - ---- ---- - ---- - -- r— -- - ------ -- - - --- - —, N \ AMC! 7 d:02A As n W/FUSED d:OBOE As 1 I 1 1 r ov DISCONNECT Old d:02MTS As I O d:14W As I I I I a I I I I Q I N O Ln 0 I i t I i O 3' -0• 2 / u, d:S060 Al d:04S Al C I I I O N 6 41 2W At-d:025WS At I I I I I I O o J d:LAUN Al N >) N to d:DRWNSCM At I I ( I " 6 FOOD COUNTER • +U N d d:SELtC Al I I 1 1 I (- . Fm Comm O to v �; �"�, i D cc UNIT #4 I I UNIT #S I r-� d:ELECALCS At I M►2 ED �Yi I I OPP NANO M1 1 "� i t l 0 1 8 45►M• 1 1 y1aD /02 M• I - O O � I ' RI 1 r O.F.1. WASM I i I I —�--" PASS I VE KITCHEN B I0 I i I M AREA I o DW//Lo.D. --& _ o .OSINK o UNIT #3 i i UNIT #6 I I z I TYP. I I TYp. OPP. HAND � � 4 � 1 � -- � y RAi� a I ( i I 1 W _ _a yAN.E r Mom , I I 1 I -- - --- - -- - --_ tA FO 0 --J I u' OJL " 1 SHELF A POLE I I I o o I -- —� SHELF A POLE •o I I I I •, a in 1 I I Ln 2' -6- 10' -6' N CENTER LINE OF I i 1 I PARTY WALL OR I I I EXTERIOR O FACE OFENDUNIT 24' -0' I 2 I I 2 I TYPICAL UNIT TYPICAL UNIT PLAN SCALE: 1/4'=1'-a• ELECTRICAL PLAN ._ • Job #8615 o I I I I SCALE. 1/4 1 -0 iL-— ———— i � I •� •" I o 6F H 1 2 3 4 S 6 7 I I •6 1. ELECTRICAL SYMBOL SCHEDULE ^ - - - - - - - - - Ln I N O 1 10V SINGLE POLE SWITCH looA 1o0 A IOOA 100A 1ooA 1ooA IOOA IOOA , —� I � " _ _ __ �� � cl UNIT #2 `� UNIT #7 I THREE WAY SWITCH i 1 w O3 I 1 = ( !ro •Yi I I CF'P. NAND HIRRGtZ4"sD 1 4 ._ U 3 6tM. 1 i 3 CEILING MOUNT LIGHT I I 3 FIXTURE 1 r'`-i I 0 -- --- - - -- -- --- — 6Nowe I I L 18'-2 3/4' '-9 a/4• J FLUORESCENT STRIP LIGHT I �J I Q I I I UNIT # 1 I W "M01E t0A"D EXHAUST FAN � � � ~ I TYP I PROVIDE LIGHT u=i J MAIN ELECTRICAL SERVICE 4 Q (v 1 + IN SPA PDRYIR __ Z ENTRANCE AND METER LOCATIONJ (v<a 110V DUPLEX OUTLET APT. 1-7 TYP. HOUSE PANEL CL _� - -— - 600 s.f. x 3u 1800 POOL BLOWER 3000o TO SPA LIGHT M GAS STUD-OUT s Z > 2,rCV APPLIANCE OUTI_FT RANGE $200 F1LTER PUMP 600 Q.11 r N FOR 8-B-0 ►-y (2) KIT. SM. APPL.3000 POOL HEATER S00�I W/H m 110V DUPt X G.D. 120o DASHERS 12) 3700 � O I I I P H I _E OUTLET W/ W.H. 14" Y�LICKTS FAN 17500 I _ 1 /2 HOT TO SWITCH A/C 1590 CARPORT LIGHTS S00 ~ ~' U— F.A.U. 290 9600 i I 1 1 110V DUPLEX OUTLET W/ 10780 W Z J I I I t • � Pi GFI CIRCUIT J 600 Q 1 I 16760 X 7 = 131460 + 9 + 141260 / 240 X 4V.. = 260 AMPS. w m I I 110V WEATHERPROOF N 13'-4- 3 0'=8= — — ' UA-rE --i )� � o •N LAUNDRY ROOM PLAN •_ . DUPLEX OUTLET o�I� "� 1• I PbST S SCALE: 1/4 -1 0 l!1 �j 0 1 I L.1GHT w N 110V SMOKE DETECTOR Q LJ LW MOUNTED IN CEILING � � � � I 21 3/4- 9'-e• 12• 3/0• CABLE TELEVISION Q O cp I 1 '-6 1 2- I N OUTLET PANEL ' 1-7" BRYANT 20C.2L 120/140 i' 3u SURF. 0 _ �"+ —j ` I i `� �KP I o TELEPHONE JACK DESCRIPTION4- DOORCB S/N IPTION OO Q � SCHEDULE T 1 KITCHEN ,: FAU z J o �c •0 1 I I 1 _ _ 1 3 KITCHEN wn s FAU 1 LL Lrl �t Q_ Q_ ELECTRIC SERVICE PANEL 3068 METAL INSULATED PANEL WEATHERSTR I PPED RECESSED IN WALL 5 GARB. DISPOSAL «n w RANGE 6 7 DISHWASHER wn RANGE I I O 2868 HOLLYWOOD/TEMP. FLUSH WEATHERSTR I PPED j � H 10S H V O L T A L E C O N N E C T I O N 9 REC. w: WATER HEATIf- PLAN ( SPA EQUIPMENT-SEE SITE W/ "USED DISCONNECT 11 REC. ..n • WATER HEATER 12 L_ — — — — —— _ — — _J FOR EXACT LOCATION __ ' W/FUSED (� O 2868 SOLID CORE FLUSH i _ N A 71U R A 1._ GAS POINT _ 13 LIGHTING >v: t A/C 14 220Y DISCONNECT F ` O N N F C 7 I O N 15 SPARE .w • A/C .76 G 8068 BY-PASS WARDROBE MIRRORED ! 17 SPARE un wr 0FI 1B 13'-8• 36'-4 1/2' 13'-8' I Q W.P./ 4 1 SPAREun a. G.F. I. O 6068 BY-PASS WARDROBE MIRRORED 63'-8 1/20 PROVIDE POWER STUB AND 100A TIME CLOCK FOR YARD O 1650 FACE FRAME FLUSH BUSS LIGHTING AND IRRIGATION CONTROLLER-LOCATE AS PER PANEL 'HOUSE" BRYANT 20C.2L 120/140 1 ' 3u SURF. OWNER 7O 3066 SOLID CORE FLUSH 0 K DESCRIPTION CB C! Q DESCRIPTION R o 8O 3068 HOLLYWOOD/TEMP. FLUSH 1 POOL BLOWER « Y 2 __ we Vw_ 3 POOL SLOWER . D .nti ww°°°"V '„"d'+r"*me w ..WNW ow.N .on snow.y.r....r BUILDING FLOORLAN -�ow.�' �'0~= 5 FILTER PUMP « wn DRYER 6 •'�• �...+«'e. IN Duo so fw- EXTERIOR ELECTRICAL PLAN SCALE: 1/8'=l'-0- A WINDOW SCHEDULE 9 POOL HEATER wn PUMPYARD L104TS 10 � of o"wo--m"On 11 IPOOL HEATER • M% I CARPORT LI Off S 12 13 SPARE «n wn SPARE 14 A 6040 SLIDING 15 ISPARE «n an SPARE 114 OB 4030 SLIDING 17 SPARE _ _ «n on SPARE its 191 on OC 6016 SLIDING 11 N 100A OD 2016 SLIDING OBSCURE HISS z z — -- _ D cl . N m Or 1 WIWI + m •WEBB• GABLE LOUVER W GL 412 (TYPICAL ! 2 LOCATIONS) Z O CONCRETE TILE C� a w ROOFING � W F Ds � D1 D• 1 N 12 N (� Q 4 TI YP EXTERIOR CEMENT � PLASTER AT WALLS, O ' AND FASCIA 4 TOP OF PLATE D: At 6•MASONRY GARDEN cc o: Al , ' • , WALLS W/ WOOD GATE. uj 0: Al W 6•MASONRY +, WALL TYP. OPEN 73-610 aD 40STEEL TUBE COLUMNS : 4•STEEL TUBE COLUMNS m ® CARPORTS • CARPORTS FIN15H FLOOR - v� . Z O } Z_ 60TALL NL44MS a TO CONTRAST W/ WROGHT IRON GAt[ BACKGROUND. AND GRILL. SOUTH ( 73-810 SANTA R05A WAY ) ELEVATION SCALE 1/4• = 1' -0• JOB 8615 CONCRETE TILE ROOFING EXTERIOR CEMENT ` PLASTER AT WALLS R FASCIA TOP OF PLATE uj 4'STEEL TUBE COLUMNS c - - --- - - - ------- --- - ---- i ._- -- - - - - -- —_- - --- --- — ..-- - - --- --_-- OPEN OPEN AT CARPORTS 4D I �'' • • — — —— — — — — L 42• HIGH WASONRY WALL FINISH FLOOR F- z WEST E_hEVAT I ON 1 SCALE : 1/80 = 1'-0• W � N Q REMOVABLE LOUVER VENT Q N N FOR ATTIC ACCESS 20•x30• 0s 1 CONCRETE TILE •ti ROOFING z Q q' 12 4(GYP EXTERIOR CEMENT W N ■ _ PLASTER AT WALLS. AND FASCIA O 01 TOP OF PLATE 60MASONRY GARDEN �. 6•Msa ASONRY WALLS "� WALL TYP. OPEN U ~' r-- -- -- -- - -- --•-•-- ------ -- - - - - i --- - --- - . -- - - - - ---� _ _ _� Q I O lj �V I FINISH FLOOR I m LLJ LLJ V NORTH ELEVATION SCALE : 1r8• = 1' -0• z Ln LL IT F- oQ � Q (v _ > z I I-- :z O� J CD O Q �O CONCRETE TILE w Q- ROOFING _ EXTERIOR CEMENT TOP OF PLATE - _ --- - PLASTER AT WALLS t FASCIA -' - 6 MASONRY GARDEN WALLS Lu 9 40STEEL TUBE OPEN -- - - -----,— --- --- -- --- -• ------- ----.--- - ---- -- - - - - ---- - -- -- \ COLUMN • CARPORT t- MAIN — z-- -1 is r ———— ----------- --- --I ELEC. �-- 4-STEEL TUBE43 10 COLUMN O COVERED I Q I FINISH FLOOR PANEL PATIO AREA _ I O- EAST ELEVATION SCALE : 1/0* = 1' -0• uj a a � � T%m d"wl aw w N v+ - a*Got cool aro array rror to all ae arry awa. a.arp or a/�*�+ am tr arataa ta.rrw aaaa Nowtab awr 1 ant MM r wrest«•w.�rr- touopray rnt r rwrrr r tr neooa w asarira anon r w mrn..r.�w..of am-xv N N V O (i _Z Z Q m 10'-0. 24'-0- 16'-0• 24'-0- 10'-0• NEW 3' RETAINING WALL. UNDER � 84'-0 s 000aiae - NEW 5' HIGH BLK. WALL EXISTING PLANTING POWER " m POLE Z o t _ W a»�1Ao1 D:OQ Al I i o D:43 Al DtOWS Al I a I I I I c LEGAL DESCRIPTION i I I . o:"I" ct o f I I 1 I I o u o: �� UNIT #4 I . I ' UN I 1� #S I ~< Ds to ct LOT 28 PALM VILLAGE GARDEN TRACT W � I - � I f I DsootKrs ct MIS 21/56t67 RIVERSIDE. COUNTY (�(MTL I I z I I r uj ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 627-121-020-3LLJ j`J ! otoAs h' co D:WKfS A2 Ln Z i i I I tr o I f < > >_ I I • I . I J z I a D:Ono UNIT #3 UN I lj #6 z r a o f I I .lo w CONCRETE TILE • ROOFING 12 I f I. t. 4I—TYp EXTERIOR CEMENT ( I I I I I - W I ? ( I X E' FiL►SCT R AT WALLS. -;, FASCIA SOFFIT I T W • .- AND < �. IL - - - - I . - -- - - . JOB 8615 IN 73-810 i f I I I X Ln . I• I i ,+ i i I � 73-810 SANTA ROSA WAY ELEVATION SCALE 1/8• _ 1'-0• z IL i UN $ T #2 I I I UNI1f #7 f ` c z i I f . I t— 1 •�- Ln ~" U < I W I - 24'-0- 6'—0- 2'—6• IS'—6• LAUNDRY RGOM i MAINTENANCE I I Ln t ui • F— Q- N cr UNIT # 1 ROOF LINE Lo I' Y ` Q W I • 47 A T _ _ SPA SPA I �, t f - i q _. I f I �3 ! 2 c I I ECU I PME�IT I AREA J (m LL W I O - 1 1 , CL z m a _ . ACTIVE i - w ,o , i t ` _� l J O GAS Ln N v L AREA __ - __ _ I I i I I ATER Q. N i I f-- Z IT x � to o O --, PASSIVE - �' - ;-_ I I Mo 1 I I ■. � u D I I I > ARE A FOOD COUNTER N I ! o ! ' I I I W Q ® � o r o � � I N CARAOAT i PARKING CA*ORT i • Lfl V • ARK I N m i ! D.W. I r ; I I I FOR i 8 CARS I I I i W i v I. LL �: I _ �- -- -- -1- -- - - - L--- - ---1-- - - J K I TCNEN -- ----------- 1 1. . 9 ] f W ' o REF. J in • O W SHELF AND POLE do - M O V CL _ Ln 10'-!0• 2' -8• 10'-6• I a se or a.,Co m W000 A q*W,,WW •r•y.ne ooc r+pr••r ddlc o.e v..•n•i • • •• •• •• cm Do ob aft •• • •■ e+a.plr to w root•M v+w~n rr '24'-0• � ;r i a r, UNIT # 1 TYPICAL SCALE 1/4' = 1' -0' 10'-0• 20'--0- _ 24•-0• 20'-0• • 10 -o SIDEYARD DRIVEWAY SIDEYARD S A N T A R A S A W A Y z z