The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutTT 11791 COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE/MONTEREY AVENUE 1988 / INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM J U f_ 2 8 1988 Ci�`!510NIr/ DE'itLOPMEidi UEPAR7hlEtq Cltt e T0: Ray Diaz, Assistant City Manager/Community Development Dlr^F"c"'ectPEFf FROM: Richard J. Folkers, Assistant City Manager/Public Works Director SUBJECT: DISPOSITION OF LOT 61, TRACT 11791. SAGEWOOD SUBDIVISION DATE: July 28, 1988 In response to your memo of July 26, I have contacted Jeff Molver regarding the disposition of the subject lot. The following are responses to your three concerns: (1) What the original plans call for? The original plans called for this lot to be utilized as a single- family residential lot when the master storm drain system is installed. (2) What are the costs of the change? This is meaningless as the city is responsible for installing a storm drain system that is functional . There were three different options, and the option that we are providing is for two drain inlets in either side of the future driveway for Lot 61 , as well as an easement along the north side of the lot so that a storm drain can be installed to pick up the water from Nolina Court and transmit it to the north/south storm drain located immediately east of the Sagewood subdivision property line. (3) Are all parties agreeable? The city and the developer are agreeable as far as I am concerned. The representatives from the homeowners association indicated that they may consider purchasing the lot to make it into a "tot lot"; however, this transaction will be outside the scope of our project. The city does not have any responsibility to provide a "tot lot". The only responsibility the city has is to install a functional drain system so that Lot 61 can . be ultimately utilized for the construction of a residential housing unit. RICHARD J. FOLKERS, P.E. RJF/ms CC: Bruce Altman Carlos Ortega Ki'rby Warner yk�� CITY OF PALM DESERT INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM July 26, 1988 TO: Dick Folkers FROM: Ramon A. Diaz SUBJECT: Disposition of Lot 61 , Tract 11791 , Sagewood Subdivision I concur with your recommendation that the property in question not be developed as a tot lot. The concern that I have at this juncture revolves around what the members of the Sagewood Homeowners Association board believes will occur with the property. Are they of the opinion that the lot in question has to be developed as a tot lot? I believe that they should be notified that the lot can be developed with single-family residential units. The other concerns I have involve: 1 . What the original plans call for? 2. What are the costs of the change? 3. Are all parties agreeable? I need this clarification before I will feel comfortable authorizing any design changes or other action which was not previously anticipated.. ON A. DIAZ, A ST. CITY MANAGER/ DIRECTOR OF COMM NITY DEVELOPMENT PLANNING /rlw CC: Bruce Altman Carlos Ortega Kirby Warner y.i 10 INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM C;ifry'+;U4f(r Dt erai.r,,.e... Clir OF.PAL89 DESfR1.•,, •„°i.. ✓fO: Ray Diaz, Acting City Manager FROM: Richard J. Folkers, Asst. City Manager/Public Works Director SUBJECT: DISPOSITION OF LOT 61 - TRACT 11791, SAGEWOOD SUBDIVISION DATE: July 22, 1988 We have been negotiating with Michael Gallagher of the McBail Company regarding the various possibilities for this lot. As you are aware, Carlos Ortega lives immediately north of the lot, but you are probably not aware that we have been discussing the desires of the Sagewood Homeowners Association. On June 20, 1988, Gregg Holtz and I met with three members of the board to discuss their concerns. Those representatives were: (1) Mr. Jeff Molever - President (2) Ms. Molly Schecter - Vice President (3) Ms. Geo J.Pack, Sr.- Secretary They indicated several possibilities, one of which was to make that lot into a tot lot for the neighborhood. After our discussions with Michael Gallagher, as well as reviewing the possibilities with Willdan, it is our feeling that the city should not purchase this lot, but rather we should obtain a ten-foot easement along the north side of the property so that we can connect to the storm drain that is going along the east side of the .Sagewood subdivision. In this way, we can eliminate the need for the city to maintain a tot lot, and we will have provided storm water protection for the person who purchases or develops the lot, as well as adjacent properties in the Sagewood subdivision area. We have discussed this briefly with Carlos Ortega, who is also the property owner on the north side of Lot 61, but. we have not discussed the matter with the property owner on the south side of Lot 61. In view of the fact that the recommendation that the property be allowed to be developed as a single-family residence unit, we do not see any reason to make contact with that property owner at this point in time. We have contact Ray Metzger to give us an appraisal of the lot, as well as the ten-foot easement along the north side of the lot which would be immediately south of Carlos Ortega's residence. (Page 1 of 2) DISPOSITION OF LOT 61 -' TRACT 11791, SAGEWOOD. SUBDIVISION I If this does not meet with your satisfaction, please contact me; other- wise, we will proceed to make the necessary design changes to accomplish the drain design based upon this memo, as well as negotia- tions with McBail Homes for the procurement of the ten-foot easement. RI HARD J. FO KERS, P.E. REVIEWED AND CONCUR ACTING CITY MANAGER cc: Bruce Altman Carlos Ortega . Kirby Warner Gregg Holtz Joseph Gaugush Sondra Sullivan RJF/lw (Page 2 of 2) McBAIL C&PANY RECEIVED July 19 , 1988 �it��, 1anr City of Palm Desert CITY CFiftLiM MErOFAV 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, Ca, 92260 Attn: Richard J. Folkers , P .D. Assistant City Manager/Public Works Director Ref : Lot 61, Tract 11791, Sagewood Subdivision Palm Desert Dear Mr . Folkers : This letter follows receipt of your June 17 , 1988 letter, and our meeting in your office on July 14 , 1988 , both pertaining to the proposed Storm Drain Line to be extended through the above- referenced lot . Our position in this matter is as follows : 1 . The subject lot was conditioned to be vacant and utilized as a storm drainage retention basin until such time as an area storm drainage system was constructed. 2 . There are no, limitations on the Final Map for Tract 11791 limiting the use of lot 61, and we have paid taxes, as well as Homeowner Association dues, for the past nine ( 9 ) years . 3 . We suggest the proposed Storm Drain Line could be located along the north property line, and the Nolina Court inlet redesigned to permit a driveway, thereby . allowing .the lot to be developed. 3200 DANVILLE BLVD., SUITE 200 ALAMO, CALIFORNIA 94507-1914 P.O. BOX 105.6 TELEPHONE 415-838-1460 Page - 2 . 4 . The development. of Lot 61 with a single-family home is of benefit to the City and to the Sagewood Homeowners Association. 5 . An alternative to the above would be for' the City to buy the lot . After inquiring of certain local developers , we estimate the current market value for an improved lot in an attractive subdivision like Sagewood to be $45 , 000 . We trust the above adequately outlines our position. Please call if questions arise or further information is required. Very truly yours, MCBAIL COMPANY G le Dire o of nd D ve p nt MRG/sh cc : Bob Vatc er i 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 NOTICE OF ACTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA APPLICANT: CASE: McBail Company Tract No. 117 1 P. 0. Box 19102 Las Vegas, Nevada 89119 ACTION: X_ APPROVED CONTINUED DENIED OTHER REMARKS: Final Subdivision Map and Agreements of Tract #11791 , approved by attached Resolution No. 79-27. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Brush, McPherson, Newbrander, Wilson & Mullins NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None I hereby certify that the foregoing is a full , true, and correct copy of an order made and entered in the City Council Minutes of April 12, 1979 DATED: April 16. 1979 SHEILA R. GILLIGAN, CITY CLERK, in an for the City of Palm Desert, California RESOLUTION NO. 79-27 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE FINAL SUBDIVISION MAP OF TRACT # 11791 , AND APPROVING THE AGREEMENTS RELATING THERETO BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Palm Desert, California as follows: 1. The Final Subdivision Map of Tract # 11791, City of Palm Desert, California, is hereby approved as the official subdivision map of said tract, subject to the conditions of the Tentative Map. 2. The Mayor and City Clerk are authorized to execute on behalf of the City a Standard Subdivision Agreement guaranteeing completion of the public improvements required by law. 3. The City Engineer is authorized to receive the improvement security as required by law on behalf of the City, subject to the approval of the City Attorney as to form. 4. The City Engineer is directed to process the Final Maps for recording upon receipt of the required improvement security and the payment of all fees. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED on this 12th day of April 1979, by the following vote: AYES: Brush, McPherson, Newbrander, Wilson & Mullins NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None %ED R INS. JR. , Mayor ATTEST: ISHEIR R. GILLI AN, City erk City of Palm Desert, Ca fornia „ac3ail .7c. I' 40-368 Sa -wood Dr. balm Desert, ;al . 92260 .1 ul: of Palm Desert Plarrnine Department Palm Dase_°t, Calif . 92260 Atten : Stan This is a follow-u.p latt!3r to the con,;Prsation we had on !=_ulmi_st 20 . We will complete the ccmmcn :area landscaping, lots 102 and 103, of the Sa eurcod s,a.bdiaision by Ai,i,uUst 23th. The only possible exception to tYiis complet�Ion date will be %lant n the la-,,jr becau.sc of any Bela- 7.i rsGGIVID—. Cu.r elP,c- tr•ical :noter. 1f power is on by the 2 tb. *e will have all the common area complete . 'ae Mould appreciate your consideration of the 0 of 0 so that ray. recai.ve an electric meter in order to finish the Than” you. Steobo,,i ^a l Gv / �� IO "TC Sa.il Co . June 26, 19980 j McBail Co . 6 Zga� Palm6Desertod Dr. l,oCalif. voroo E' " DESERTS cin Planning Department City of Palm Desert Palm Desert, Calif. Atten: Paul Williams Tr. Williams, We, at McBail Co . , would like to request the City of Palm Desert for a delay in seeding the front lawns for our Sage,,iood subdivision until the electrical power has been tussled on by Southern California Edison. As you know, Edison will not turn on the power until the City has finaled the house. Therefore we are asking for a final with the promise the lawn will be seeded promptly upon receipt of power. We are not requesting this for' all of the houses, just for the ones the buyers will not be moving into right away. A new lawn s;.ould be watered at least 4 times a day in the summer and without personnel on weekends you can see our prob lem without the automatic system in use. We would appreciate your consideration of our request. T✓h 1, uA Steve Bailey Project Manager C 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 December 21 , 1978 First American Title Insurance Co. 3625 14th St. Riverside, CA 92502 Attn: Jo Ann Tate, Subd. Secy. Re: Tract 11791 Dear Ms. Tate: Responding to your request of December 11 , 1978, please be advised of the following: 1 . Present zoning of said tract is R2-8,000 (Single-family-Multi-family) 8,000 minimum lot. 2. Zoning to the North - Riverside County Zoning South - PR-5 (Upon Annexation) East - PR-5 (Upon Annexation) West - Riverside County Zoning 3. The Director of Environmental Services has determined on April 24, 1978, that the project will not have a significant adverse effect on the environ- ment. ( Vtruly yours, Paul A. Williams, AIP Zoning Administrator lm/pw/ks ✓ S.t AME R7c First American Title Insurance Company 3625 FOURTEENTH STREET, (P.O. BOX 986) RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92502 (AREA 714) 684-1600 December 11, 1978' City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickley Pear Lane Palm Desert, California 92260 RE: TRACT NO. 11791 Gentlemen: Please provide us with a letter on your letterhead verifying the Zoning on the above referenced Tract. Also, please provide us with a letter as to the zoning on the property to the North, South, East and Vest of said Tract. Also, please provide us with a copy of the Notice of Determination and Negative Declaration for said Tract. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. JoAnn Tate Subdivision Secretary Pa-T& _ d �e�(�'i L/L?-Zt+iR'raA_•,'� CY ?�' N / �'i,aa-ve- M, ,t�•L '6..�+^t,«n.,,'�` '�j ,� �j vL/ +G'4'u�- 1n...v�-c�vC,.�/77- -.Fr.�( , C. CONTINUED CASE NO. TT 5565, SILVER SPUP, ASSOCIATES, Applicant: Consideration of an Amendment to the Standard Conditions of Approval and Special Conditions of Approval for Case No. TT 5565 in Order to Permit Portola Avenue to Become a Private Roadway from its Intersection with Mesa View Drive Extended Westerly to Highway 74. Mr. Williams reported that Resolution 78-88 would amend certain Conditions of Approval for Case No. TT 5565. He further stated that there would be plans for traffic-safety lighting and future agreement for sidewalks. —, Mayor Mullins declared the Hearing open and invited input in FAVOR. LARRY SPICER, Indian Wells, California, explained that this was rather a i housekeeping type of procedure, and that private streets are consistent within the Ironwood Development , as they are all private. Mayor Mullins invited input in OPPOSITION, and none was offered. He declared the Public Hearing closed. Councilman McPherson moved and Councilman Brush seconded to waive further reading and adopt Resolution 78-88, approving the Amendment to the Standard and Special Conditions of Approval .�o�i carried unanimously. D. CASE NO. TT 11791 , MCBAIL COMPANY Applicant: Consideration of a Request for AP. of a ahtative Tract Map to create 101 Single-family P,esiden- tial Lots and 3 Lots to Provide for a District Commercial Center, a Common Recreation Area and Open Space from a 40 Acre Parcel located within the P.C. (2) (Planned Commercial , District) and R-2 8,000 (8) (Single-family Residential , 8,000 Sq. Ft. Min. Lot Area, 8,000 Sq. Ft. of Site Area(du) Zones, Upon Annexation, at the Southeast Corner of Country Club Drive & Monterey Avenue. Mayor Mullins declared the Public Hearing Open. Mr. Williams provided the Council with additional drawings of the proposed Project. He stated that there would be a shopping Center (95,000 Sq. Ft. ) to include a Super Market, Gas Station and Retail shops. He further stated that the Design Review Board had planned for high walls around the property for protection in the blowsand area, and that the buildings would face the parking lot for added protection against the blowing sand. The common theme would be red tile roofs throughout, with a 25 foot high buffer between Residential and Industrial . He stated that Monterey and Country Club would be the two access points. The recommended floor plan for two stories had been deleted, and the developers were in the process of changing the design. He explained that there would be a 60 foot wide street meandering through the property with five cul -de-sacs. The recreation area would include 2 tennis courts , swimming pool , jacouzi and a small recreation building. Mr. Williams stated that this Project conforms to the Zoning Ordinance and is suitable for the area, and therefore, the Planning Commission, by Resolution 370 recommends approval . He added that the Planning Commission had been split on the lot size issue. Councilman Wilson questioned the Planning Commission ' s unanimous approval even with the split on the Zoning. Councilman Brush commented on the possible monotony- of having the roofs all the same, whereas Mr. Williams explained that the roof design would not be the same throughout, but that the red tile would tie it all together. Councilman Nevibrande'r requested a drawing of the commercial section. She also commented on the 1644 foot three bedroom House plan as being tight. Mr. Williams responded that the issue of the house size had been discussed many times. a.�nr iiaynr asked for any remarks from the Applicant. MIKE GALLAGHER, MCBAIL COMPANY, presented a brief explanation that the majority of the homes were from 1800 to 2000 sq. ft. , with approximately 20_ of them at the 1644 so,. ft. size. In response to Councilman Brush' s c r�ment on the red tiie roofs, he felt that the curving street would break, up the monotony. 4 _ r I 43/ -c si PUBLIC HEARINGS (cont ad) Councilman Brush inquired as to the objection to two-story buildings and Mr. Gallagher explained that it was mainly because of the heat. MR. JOSEPH TOBIN, Indian Wells, California, Director of Development at the Eisenhower Medical Center, addressed Council stating that one of the big problems they have at Eisenhower in recruiting help is the availability of adequate housing. He also stated that he felt this Development would alleviate traffic problems for their employees , as they could form car- pools to and from work. Therefore, Mr. Tobin declared they were in favor of the development of this Project, as it would be a big help to the future �i growth of Eisenhower Medical Center. Councilman McPherson stated that the applicant should be commended on the planning of the meandering streets with the Village atmosphere. Councilman Brush moved and Councilman McPherson seconded to waive further reading and adopt Resolution No. 78-89, Approving the Tentative Tract subject to the Conditions of Approval . Motion carried unanimously. E. CASE NO. CUP 04-78, HOPE LUTHERAN CHURCH , Appellant: Consideration of an Appeal of a Condition of Approval of Conditional Use Permit CUP 04-78 which Approved an over-all Development Plan for a Church-School Complex, Partially Developed, at the Northeast Corner of Portola Avenue and Fairway Drive. Specifically, the Appellant is Appealing Special Condition No. 2 which would require Curbs, Gutters and Sidewalks along Portola. Mr. Williams reviewed the Staff report, stating that the Planning Commission had qranted relief on Underground utilities. He further stated that due to the increase in traffic on Portola, the Planning Commission felt that this request is not justified and recommend denying the appeal . Mayor Mullins invited input in FAVOR of the appeal . MILAN MILKOVICH, Palm Desert, addressed Council , stating that he felt -ne requirements had changed from time to time and that Hope Lutheran Church had been in compliance with the former plan, therefore, did not feel they should be responsible for the expense of new curbs and gutters. i REV. DARYL BJERKE, 45-930 Panorama Drive, Palm Desert, Pastor of the Hope Lutheran. Church, addressed Council reiterating what Mr. Milkovich had said. He stated that Hope Lutheran Church had been very cooperative in the past, and felt they had complied with the original requests of the Planning Commission. Mayor Mullins inquired as to when the Curbs and Gutters had been installed. Rev. Bjerke replied that they had been put in 18 years ago when the parking lot was put in. Councilman Brush questioned whether there mould be room for sidewalks at the location of Felloo-:ship Hall . Mr. Williams responded that there would be enough room for Curbs and Gutters, possibly not sidewalks. Mayor Mullins stated that everything possible should be done to make Portola safe and widened . Clyde Beebe annpuri_Fd that they are now putt4nq 8" Curb facirio and that %h C' 6° thaT. is nov! in would not: be adegUa to tC Cali"y L�Ja ter-fl Oti. The curb in question was measured to be 5'-, inches at Hope Lutheran Church and 6 inches at the i4ashingtcn School . Mayor Mullins declared the Public Hearing closed. l,0'!!!Cl i^ii ft 0'J ed , .,,.. CpuliC': l ',an !„ii 5(?n tip: Appeal by adopting kesolution hie. 78-90. notion carried unanimously. V111 . RESOLUTIONS ITTOF CITY CO' iiL T' ORE` 0LUT10 1i0 78-91 - A R E S 0 L CITY-c F'ALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE OFFER OF A FIP.E STATIONI SITE, DEDI- CATION OF PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY, AND THE EXTENSION OF MESA VIEW. FRO1.1 THE SILVER SPUR ASSOCIATES, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO ENTER ESCROW:: ON THE OFFER AND EXECUTING THE AGREEIMENT FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF MESA VIEW DRIVE IN COMPLIANCE idITH THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OF TRACT 5566. Mr. Williams reported that Fire Marshall But Enaei had required additional Fire protection and as a result Silver Spur Associates agreed to provide 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 March 9 , 1979 Mr. Michael R. Gallagher MCBail Company 3732 Mt. Diablo Blvd. , Suite 390 Lafayette, California 94549 Re :- Tract No 179 McBail Subdivision Dear Mr. Gallagher : I am in receipt of your letter dated February 28 , 1979 , and I am in agreement with various aspects of the letter , excepting therefrom the cost entitlement of the storm drain pipe and/or easement. I would suggest that you meet with our City Manager, Martin Bouman, and Paul Williams , Director of Environmental Services , as well as me, to resolve the exact amounts involved. Should you have any further questions , please contact me. Very truly your , i° L. Clyde Beeb Director of Public Works LCB: lg CC : Martin Bouman Paul Williams t McBail Company CEOV�D 3732 MT.DIABLO BLVD. • SUITE 390 - RE LAFAYETTE, CALIFORNIA 94549 TELEPHONE 415-284-4900 J J February 28 , 1979 DEppRTMENT ENGINE OFNPpEM DESER? CIN City of Palm Desert Department of Public Works 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, California 92260 Attention: Clyde Beede Director Reference: Letter of Understanding rega ng Storm Drainage Plan; Final Tans TT 11791 Dear Mr. Beede: This letter follows the meeting held in your office on Wednesday, February 21, 1979, attended by yourself, and Mssrs. Titera and Figueroa of VTN Consolidated, Project Engineers, and Mr Steve Bailey and the undersigned representing McBail Company. The meet- ing was requested in order to resolve the problem of conducting storm drainage off the subject site. This problem has, in part, held up the submittal of the final development plans , for the property. The objective of the meeting was to arrive at a method which was acceptable to both the City and McBail Company. As a result of the meeting, the following statements constitute our understanding of the particular drainage situation, and the proposed solution which was discussed and understood to be accept- able to both the City of Palm Desert and McBail Company: 1. The City of Palm Desert, Public Works Department (City) is in the process of developing a Master Storm Drainage Plan and System (MSDS) for the drainage area which includes the McBail property. The MSDS, being prepared by an engineering consultant, is partially complete and should be concluded by June or July 1979. The study has thus far proceeded to the extent that alternative drainage systems have been prepared and line sizes determined. 2 . Preliminary MSDS study findings indicate that a +96" storm drainage line will be required along the eastern boundary of the McBail property, extending south from Country Club Drive. Further, as that line continues south from the McBail property to Hovley Lane and thence east along Hovley Lane to a daylight point, the line diameter increases to +120 inches. City of Palm Desert Department of Public Works February 28, 1979 Page 2 3. McBail is prepared to construct the storm drainage line as generally described above to the extent of its per/acre storm drainage fee assessment by the City. However, unless the storm water in that line is picked up by another downstream segment of the MSDS, there is a potential liability to the City and McBail from the possible down-stream concentration of storm water on local streets and private property. 4. At the present time, the City does not have the funds necessary to construct the MSDS. Actual implementation of the MSDS is expected to be carried out incrementally through improve- ment requirements of various development projects as they are approved by the City, in addition to the City' s use of accumulated storm drainage fee assessments . In the interim, the City will accept temporary solutions which will permit projects, such as McBail ' s, to be developed. 5 . McBail and the City have agreed to a temporary method and solution for meeting the storm drainage requirements of the subject land and proposed development. The method allows McBail to utilize one or more identified areas of the subject property as temporary storm drainage retention basins. The combined capacity of these basins shall be sufficient to contain at least the calculated off- site storm water drainage of a storm of 10 year frequency. 6 . McBail has revised and submits under separate cover, the final improvement plans for Tract 11791. The final plans include the grading and drainage plan, depicting, in part, the two areas to be utilized as temporary retention basins. They are described as follows: A. Lot 102 . Recreation Center. The storm drainage areas include the ground area surrounding the tennis cour`_s, pool and cabana facilities. B. Lot 61. McBail agrees that this lot will not be de- veloped for the intended use as . a single-family dwelling un- til such time as the McBail land can be served by the MSDS . The City agrees to permit McBail to develop said lot at that time. 7. McBail agrees to pay to the City the required storm drain- age fees on the basis of $1, 500 per acre . The City agrees to cre- dit McBail with the agreed-upon amount McBail paid to the owner of AP 621-190-050 for the 15 ft. storm drainage easement acquired by N McBail prior to this agreement for the benefit of the City and ultimately to be utilized in the MSDS. City of Palm Desert Department of Public Works February 28, 1979 Page 3 8. The City agrees to size the storm drainage line serving the McBail property in the MSDS without regard to McBail ' s tem- porary use of lot 61 for a storm drainage retention basin. The intent being that the drainage fees McBail pays to the City will ultimately result in a storm drainage system serving McBail' s property, to the extent that the land areas McBail agrees to uti- lize as temporary retention basins can be released from such tem- porary use and developed for the intended use. We hope the above sufficiently outlines the conclusions and pro- posals reached at the meeting, and adequately explains our pro- posed temporary solution. Please advise if further information is required. Sincerely, MCBAIL COMPANY 1 G a , IP: Direc or of P tinning MRG:plb cc: VTN - San rnardino: Titera VTN - Orange County: Wells, Figueroa Stephen Bailey July 13, 1978 CITY OF PALM DESERT TRANSMITTAL LETTER I . TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council II . REQUEST: Request for approval of a Tentative Tract Map to create 101 single-family residential lots and 3 lots to provide for a District Commercial Center, a common recreation area and open space from a 40 acre parcel located within the P.C. (2) (Planned Commercial , District) and R-2 8,000(8) (Single- family residential , 8,000 sq. ft. min. lot area, 8,000 sq. ft. of site area/du) zones, Upon Annexation, at the south- east corner of Country Club Drive and Monterey Avenue. III . CASE NO. : TT 11791 , McBail Company, Applicant IV. CONTENTS: A. Staff Recommendation. B. Draft Resolution/70-MX%Wk No. 78-89 C. Review of major issues discussed by the Planningg Commission. (See P.C. minutes of meeting of May 17, T978. D. Planning Commission Resolution No. 370 . E. Planning Commission Staff Report dated May 17, 1978 F. Portion of Planning Commission minutes dealing with the subject request. G. Related maps and/or exhibits. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - A. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Tentative Tract subject to the Conditions of Approval by Resolution No. 78-89. Justification is based upon the following: 1 . The subject Tentative Map does substantially comply with Chapter 26 of the City of Palm Desert Municipal Code, and the State of California Subdivision Map Act, as amended. 2. The subject Tentative Map does comply with the adopted General Plan and the Palm Desert Zoning Ordinance. 3. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed. 4. The site is physically suited for the proposed density of the development. 5. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or serious health pro- blems. RESOLUTION NO. 78-89 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, SETTING FORTH ITS FINDINGS AND APPROVING A TENTATIVE MAP TO CREATE 101 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS AND 3 LOTS TO PROVIDE FOR A DISTRICT COMMERCIAL CENTER, A COMMON RECREATION AREA AND OPEN SPACE FROM A 40 ACRE PARCEL LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE AND MONTEREY AVENUE . CASE NO. TT 11791 WHEREAS , the City Council of the City of Palm Desert did hold a duly noticed Public Hearing on July 13 , 1978, to consider an applica- tion from the MCBAIL COMPANY , requesting approval of a Tentative Tract Map to create 101 single-family residential lots and 3 lots to provide for a District Commercial Center, a common recreation area and open space from a 40 acre parcel located within the P .C . (2 ) (Planned Commer- cial , District) and R-2 8, 000 (Single-family residential , 8, 000 sq . ft . of site area/du) zones , Upon Annexation , at the southeast corner of Country Club Drive and Monterey Avenue, more particularly described as : APN 621-190-045-8 APN 621-150-002-9 WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Environmental Quality Procedure Resolution No . 78-32" in that the Director of Environmental Services has developed an expanded initial study on the pre-zoning Case No . C/Z 01-78 which in- cludes the subject property and weighs the environmental impacts of said project , and this consideration has been determined to be an on- going project; and, WHEREAS, the City Council did take into consideration the Tenta- tive Map as submitted, and the reports of the various reviewing agencies ; and, WHEREAS, the City Council did find that the subject Tentative Map does . substantially comply with Chapter 26 of the City of Palm Desert Municipal Code, and the State of California Subdivision Map Act , as amended; and, WHEREAS, the City Council did find that the subject Tentative Map does . comply with the adopted General Plan and the Palm Desert Zon- ing Ordinance ; and, WHEREAS , the City Council did find that the site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and, WHEREAS, the City Council did find that the site is physically suited for the proposed density of the development ; and, WHEREAS, the City Council did find that the design of the sub- division and the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substan- tial environmental damage or serious health problems . NOW, THEREFORE , BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Palm Desert, as follows : 1 . That the above recitations are true and correct and consti- tute the findings of the Council in this case ; 2 . That it does hereby require that the applicant pay a fee in an amount determined under the Ordinance provisions in order to comply with Article 26. 15 of the City' s Subdivision Ordinance regarding the public facilities requirement ; RESOLUTION NO. 78-89 Page Two 3 . That it does hereby approve the above described Tentative Map No. 11791 , subject to fulfillment of the attached conditions . PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert City Council held on this day of 1978, by the following vote , to wit : AYES : NOES : I ABSENT: ABSTAIN : EDWARD D. MULLINS, Mayor ATTEST: SHEILA R. GILLIGAN, City Clerk City of Palm Desert , California l RESOLUTION Na. 78-89 Page Three CM1-D IT i0`(S OF APPROVAL CASE S0 . TT 11791 Standard Conditions : I . The development of the property described herein shall he sub.jec:to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein whic!i are in addition to all municipal ordinances and State and Federal statutes now in force , or which hereafter may be in force . 2. Full public improvements includin; traffic safety lighting as required by Ordinance and the Director of Public ,Vo_k shall be installed in accordance with City standards . 3. The C.C. &R' s for this development shall be submitted to the Director of Public Works for review and approval prior to the issuance of anv building permits . Prior to recordation of the final subdivision man , the applicant shall submit to the Director of Public i4orks : a. The document to convey title . b. Covenants and restrictions to be recorded including a single story limitation for buildings . C. Management and maintenance agreement to be entered into with the owners of the units of the project . 4 . Improvement plans for water and sewer system Ishall meet the require- ments of the respective service districts . 5. Area shall be annexed to appropriate Improvement Districts having jurisdiction over the subject area. 6. All dedicated land and/or easements required by this approval shall be granted to the City of Palm Desert , without cost to the Citv and free of all liens and encumbrances. 7. All on-site utilities , including cable TV, shall be placed under- ground and shall be completely concealed from view except certain appurtenances as may be approved by the Director of Environmental Services. 8. Complete plans and specifications shall be submitted as required by Ordinance to the Director of Public Works for checking and approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. The sub- divider shall submit "as-built" plans prior to acceptance of the subdivision improvements by the City. 9. In order to maintain reasonable fire protection during the construe-period, the subdivider shall maintain passable vehicular access to all buildings. An adequate number of fire hydrants with the re- quired fire flows shall be installed as recommended by the Fire Mar- shal . 10. All requirements of the City Fire Marshal shall be met as a part of the development of this tract per attached memorandum. 11 . Drainage shall be subject to approval of the Director of Public iWorks. Applicant shall provide engineered data as requested . 12 . All requirements of the Planning Commission action on related Case No . DP 03-78 shall be met as a part of the development of this tract . 13 . The total number of lots shall be limited to 104 . 14 . The applicant shall have twelve ( 12 ) months from the date of the approval or conditional approval of the tentative map for filing of the final map unless an extension of time of up to eighteen ( 18 ) months is granted by a Resolution of the City Council . RES0L 'i 0. 7 8-8 9 Page Four L5 . The apnLica::r 3iaii ;:z : i.,ty lnir:;uanc to .lcr. ;<_ 1 ., 26 . 33 > ; - Citv , s Suhdi: isinn 0r-dina1lrP r .�aetl :nu thc� nubLic iucilities requiremenc . r +I� 1 Special Conditions : 1 . Blow-sand protection shall be provided on al-1 sides of the project . 2. The necessary right-of-way dedication shall be deeded at recoriation . 3. All improvements shall be constructed in accordance with the Paim Desert Subdivision Standards . 4 . Sidewalkss shall be provided on Monterey and Country Club Drive . Sidewalks adjacent to the commercial area shall be 10 foot in „idth. 5 . A decorative block wall, 6 feet in height, as shown on Sheet 4 of the plans, shall be required adjacent to Lots 13 to 20, Lot 102, and Lots 36 to 41. 6. No ingress or egress to any of the lots shall be provided from Monterey Avenue excepting at "A" Street . 7. Traffic safety lighting shall be provided at "A" Street at both ends thereof . 8 . Applicant shall make a $15, 000 contribution towards the signalization of the intersection at Country Club Drive and Monterey . 9. All drainage shall be engineered and approved by the Director of Public Works . 10. Applicant shall dedicate sufficient land along Monterey 'Avenue to provide for a 34 foot half width and a 16 foot parkway which shall include an 8 ' slightly meandering bike path and intensive landscap- ing. 11. Cul-de-sac at the end of "H" Street shall be shortened to provide at least 35 feet of frontage for Lots 47 $ 48 . Lots 46 - 50 mall I be adjusted to incorporate the additional land area so that none of the lots shall be less than 8 , 000 sq. ft . 12. All residential lots shall be a minimum of 8 , 000 sq . ft . and all `- development shall confoc•m to Lill requirements of said Zone District . 13 . Subject to approval of the Director of Public Works , adequate traffic safety provisions shall be made and methods of improving traffic cir- culation in the vicinity shall be provided at the intersection of Monterey and Country Club . . 14. Plan 2116 shall be deleted. RESOLUTION NO. 78-89 Page Five fI 1 April 25, 1978 i Paul A. Williams Director of Environmental Services City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, Ca. 92250 Reference: Tentative Tract Mo. 11791 Residential area only) Provide the following fire protection: 1 . Install a water system capable of delivering 1500 GP%1 fire flow from any fire hydrant for a two hour duration in addition to domestic supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement. 2. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants located at each street intersection (a) but not greater than 500 feet apart in any direction. A. Exterior surface of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yeilo•v, and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. B. Curbs shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. 3. Prior to recordation of the final_ map, the developer shall furnish the original and three (3) copies of. the water system plan to 'the Fire Marshal for review. 4. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and approved by the water company, with the following certification : "I certify that the design of the !later system in Tract too. 11791 is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Fire Marsha I . " Upon approval , the original plan will be returned to the developer. Very truly yours , David L. Flake Fire Chief David J. Cr-erel Fire tIarsnal i IN TES EDNESDA1 . mAY 17 . 1978 - 1 : 00 P . M . - CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS I . CALL TO ORDER The regular meeting of the Palm .Desert Planning Commission was called to order by Chairman Berkey at 1 : 00 p . m . in the Council Chambers of the Palm Desert City Hall . II . PLEDGE - Commissioner Kelly III . ROLL CALL Present : Commissioner KELLY Commissioner KRYDER Commissioner SNYDER Chairman BERKEY Others Present : Paul A. Williams - Director of Environmental Services Ralph Cipriani - Associate Planner Clyde Beebe - Director of Public Works Kathy Shorey - Planning Secretary IV . APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. MINUTES of the regular meeting of May 2 , 1978 of the Planning Commission . On a motion by Commissioner Kelly , seconded by Commissioner Kryder, the minutes were approved as written; carried unanimously (4-0) . V. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS - None VI . PUBLIC HEARINGS Chairman Berkey explained the Public Hearing procedures to those present . A . Case No. C/Z 01-78 - INITIATED BY PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION Request for approval of a Planning Commission initiated Change of Zone for pre-zoning approximately 1 , 047 acres from ' S ' Study to P . C. (2 ) (U .A . ) , R-2 8 , 000( 8 ) ( U.A . ) , R-1 12 , 000 (U.A . ) , PR-5 (U .A . ) , PR-4 (U.A . ) , O . S . (U. A . ) , PR-3 (U.A . ) , PR-10 U.A . ) or any other zone deemed appro- priate on property generally located between Country Club Drive and the Whitewater Storm Channel and between Monterey Avenue and Cook Street . Mr. Williams reviewed the Staff Report and noted a map showing the proposed zoning and ci.rculati.on pattern . He also referred to a letter received from Mr. Urrsch and his request for an average of R- 1-7 , 500 sq . It . as a zoning designation . Chairman Berkey asked what the time restraints were on this mat- ter . Mr . Williams noted that: the Commission could deliberate indefi- nently . Chairman Berkey asked for further reasoning with regard to the R-2-8 , 000 zone designation . Mr. Williams noted that it is adja- cent to commercial and it is better to develop the commercial and re- sidential together to help form a buffer for the rest of the develop- ment . `,Iin-.tNs P altIl Desert Plana in}; C',�r,,m LaS 1,)n Slav 17 , 1978 Pa,e � cn Commissioner Kell%, asked hoiv accurate the summary of proposr�d students in the area leas . Mr. P1ilLiar^,s noted that 70'; „ t the anxnint would probably be more accurate . Commissioner Kryder noted that :Mr . IlirSCh ' s reasons £or an average zoniii,g of R.-1-7500 sq. It . are valid reasons and should be considered. Chairman Berkey declared the Public Hearing and asked if there was anyone wishing to speak on the matter . , F . Y. MCDONALD , Long Beach , owner of 40 acres on �l / the southwest , soutinvest corner of Section 9 , told 1�5 the Commission of his conversation with the various neighbors in the area of his sand dunes and how they and he were in favor of the Open Space desig- nation being changed. He also noted that the sand- dunes are being destroyed by 4 things : the sage brush, dune buggies , adjacent developments , and the City protecting them. Mr . McDonald stated that the whole area should be reserved as a sand dune preserve or none of it . AIR. RAFF, owner of 3 . 95 acres, a homestead parcel located on Monterey and Hovely Lane , asked to have it clarified how the proposed zoning would affect the small landowner such as himself . Mr . Williams stated that as the pre-zoning was being done as a single project , individual property owners would be exempt from the minimum site area required to obtain a Change of Zone to the P-R zone . As a result , in- dividual property owners would be able to develop under the PR zone no matter what acreage they owned once the pre-zoning is approved for the entire area . He further stated that this zoning designation would limit the .area to condos and residential homes . Chair- man Berkey noted that the staff would then be the co- ordinator for all the property in the area . Air. Raff stated that he must dedicate land for road use . Air . Williams noted that since Hovely Lane already exists that there should be no problem. RICHARD ARNOLD , 73-722 Santa Rosa, an adjacent developer told of his experiences in other areas with sand dunes, and he noted that adjacent development would stop the sand dunes from being sand dunes as it takes sand to make sand dunes . EUNICE PIERSON, representing Mr. Hirsch , noted that Air. Hirsch would appreciate further consideration of his request for 8 , 000 sq . ft . average per lot . SID HANDY, Aster Drive , 18 year resident , spoke in op- position to a open space in the middle of the City . AIRS . JOHN QUINN, stated she had a petition with 5G-58 signatures against the open space zoning , noting that it is a poor concept . DENNIS HEALY , Attorney for Air . McDonald, spoke in op- position to the open space zoning and presented pictures of the sand dunes in the area . JIM AICKEE , 73-506 Joshua Tree , owner at Portola Country Club , stated his opposition to the open space zoning.. / r ?a _ GI . PCBLIC HEARI>:Gs (Cons . ) A. Case No . C/Z 01-75 GEORGE MARZICOLA , Presidtrnt of Country Club Property Owners Association , noted he is generally in agreement I with the propnsed zoning and annexation . lie stated that the extension of streets and the improvements of others should be taken into consideration %%ith a bridge considered on Cook Street . rurther he noted that the Association is opposed to annexations because of the Excise Tax involved. RICHARD GUELICH , Santa Cruz, noted the extensive work that the Staff had put into the report on the pre- zoning and he noted his concern for the ability of the City to maintain the open space . Chairman Berkey stated that he felt the case should be continued for further review. Commissioner Kelly stated that more input is needed on the utilities in the area and the maintenance of the sand dunes . Commissioner Kryder indicated more information was needed on the traffic situation . Commissioner Snyder asked that Staff be able to answer the questions regarding maintenance of the open space and alternatives to an open space zoning designation . On a motion by Commissioner Kryder, seconded by Commissioner Kelly, the Commission continued Case C/Z 01-78 to June 14 , 1978 for further review and study ; carried unanimously (4-0) . . B. Case Nos . DP 03-78 and SOC - MCBAIL COMPANY, applicant � I ;.Ir . Williams noted that these cases and Case No . TT 11791 should be continued to June 14 , 1978 also due to the action of the Commission on the pre-zoning. MIKE GALLAGHER, representing the applicant , noted his agreement with the continuance. C. Case No . TT 11791 , continued as noted above . D. Case No. CUP 07-76 - HENRY TAGLE , Applicant Request for approval of an extension of time for an approved Conditional Use Permit to allow the construc- tion of a restaurant with Variances from parking re- quirements and setback requirements on property located at the northwest corner of Palm Desert Drive and San Carlos avenue . Mr. Williams reviewed the case and noted that the Commission had approved a previous extension of one year . Chairman Berkey declared the Public Hearing open and asked the applicant if he wished to speak at this time. RICHARD HOLDEN , representing the applicant , stated he was available to answer any questions . Commis- sioner Snyder asked why the delay . Mr . Holden stated that there was a problem with funding due to the size of the interior of the restauant . Further, the only problem that now exists is the line-of-site problem but that should be resolved with the Redevelopment plans for that area of the City. �..Myssy ..ve vr.. ^^r`Sn�+-�nh �-+r.w al. �+ u+�.w •'--_ {' W'S7. 5f��, •• .a��y^*Y•,� �,.t�Gt '}Th. �'F� Ls r �� C�. �a .a. t_ w i ^i'f 'P` Y�-Wr _- .aN-r�cc,�_•4,a,x�„e'�(e sr.a-r�..`a3+'ryr fiZ:w�iry.�,.,kx ...r" ;w ,r�.,y-,w.+•. rt,......uc.� � ..+-y - r�r w.•..-..uta..l-.... r w ;��'"'� g "� �^J?Cl.'ib�'�. 'fb1 +Verv�i.�T':f''�-'�i�PJ(�T��.•kiA"nS�.'^tzP7Fr"`�U•A S..}}Ygr^� `�P +IE�Y• PLANNING COM1fISSION RESOLUTION NO. 370 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA , SETTING FORTH ITS FIND- INGS AND RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL, APPROVAL OF A TENTATIVE MAP TO CREATE 101 SINGLE-FAMILY RE- SIDENTIAL LOTS AND 3 LOTS TO PROVIDE FOR A DISTRICT COMMERCIAL CENTER, A COMMON RECREATION AREA AND OPEN SPACE FROM A 40 ACRE PARCEL LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE AND MONTEREY AVENUE . CASE NO. TT 11791 WHEREAS , the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert , California, did receive a verified application from the MCBAIL COMPANY , requesting approval of a Tentative Tract Map to create 101 single- family residential lots and 3 lots to provide for a District Commercial Center , a common recreation area and open space from a 40 acre parcel located within the P .C . (2) (Planned Commercial , District ) and R-2 8 , 000 (Single-family residential , 8 , 000 sq . ft . of site area/du) zones , Upon Annexation , at the southeast corner of Country Club Drive and Monterey Avenue, more particularly described as : APN 621-190-045-8 APN 621-150-002-9 WHEREAS , said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Environmental Quality Procedure Resolution No . 78-32 in that the Director of Environmental Services has developed an expanded initial study on the Prezoning Case No . C/Z 01-78 which includes the subject property and weighs the environmental impacts of said project , and this consideration has been . determined to be an on—going project ; and, WHEREAS , the Planning Corimission did take into consideration the Tentative Map as submitted, and the reports of the various reviewing agencies; and, WHEREAS , the Planning Commission did find that the subject Tenta- tive Map does substantially comply with Chapter 26 of the City of Palm Desert Municipal Code, and the State of California Subdivision Map Act , as amended; and, WHEREAS , the Planning Commission did find that the subject Tenta- tive Map does comply with the adopted General Plan and the Palm Desert Zoning Ordinance ; and, WHEREAS , the Planning Commission did find that the site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and, WHEREAS , the Planning Commission did find that the site is physically suited for ,the proposed density of the development ; and , WHEREAS , the Planning Commission did find that the design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements are not likely to cause sub- stantial environmental damage or serious health problems . NOW, . THEREFORE , BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert , as follows : 1 . That the above recitations are true and correct and consti- tute the findings of the Commission in this case ; 2 . That it does hereby recommend that the applicant pay a fee in an amount determined under the Ordinance provisions in order to com- ply with Article 26. 15 of the City ' s Subdivision Ordinance regarding the public facilities requirement ; PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 370 Page Two 3. That it does hereby recommend approval to the City Council of the City of Palm Desert of the above described Tentative Map No. 11791 , subject to fulfillment of the attached conditions . PASSED, APPROVED , and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission held on this 14th day of June , 1978 by the following vote , to wit :. AYES : BERKEY, FLESIIMAN, KELLY, KRYDER, SNYDER I NOES : NONE ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE GEORGE BERKEY, Ch irman ATTEST : PAUL A. WILLIAMS, Secretary /ks f PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO . 370 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO. TT 11791 Standard Conditions : 1 . The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein which are in addition to all municipal ordinances and State and Federal statutes now in force, or which hereafter may be in force . 2. Full public improvements including traffic safety lighting as required by Ordinance and the Director of Public works , shall be installed in accordance with City standards . 3. The C.C. &R' s for this development shall be submitted to the Director of Public Works for review and approval prior to the issuance of any building permits . Prior to recordation of the final subdivision map , the applicant shall submit to the Director of Public Works : a. The document to convey title . b. Covenants and restrictions to be recorded including a single story limitation for buildings . C. Management and maintenance agreement to be entered into with the owners of the units of the project . 4. Improvement plans for water and sewer system shall meet the require- ments of the respective service districts . 5. Area shall be annexed to appropriate Improvement Districts having jurisdiction over the subject area. 6. All dedicated land and/or easements required by this approval shall be granted to the City of."Palm Desert , without cost to the City and free of all liens and encumbrances. 7. All on-site utilities , including cable TV, shall be placed under- ground and shall be completely concealed from view except certain appurtenances as may be approved by the Director of Environmental Services. 8. Complete plans and specifications shall be submitted as required by Ordinance to the Director of Public Works for checking and approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. The sub- divider shall submit "as-built" plans prior to acceptance of the subdivision improvements by the City. 9. In order to maintain reasonable fire protection during the construc- tion period, the subdivider shall maintain passable vehicular access to all buildings . An adequate number of fire hydrants with the re- quired fire flows shall be installed as recommended by the Fire Mar- shal . 10. All requirements of the City Fire Marshal shall be met as a part of the development of this tract per attached memorandum. 11 . Drainage shall be subject to approval of the Director of Public works . Applicant shall provide engineered data as requested. 12 . All requirements of the Planning Commission action on related Case No. DP 03-78 shall be met as a part of the development of this tract . 13 . The total number of lots shall be limited to 104 . 14 . The applicant shall have twelve (12) months from the date of the approval or conditional approval of the tentative map for filing of the final map unless an extension of time of up to eighteen ( 18) months is granted by a Resolution of the City Council . rLa ;I_;G CO'.IJIISSIO',' RESOLUTION NO. 370 15 . The applicant shall pay gees pursuant to drticLe 26 . 25 of the City ' s Subdivision Ordinance regardin ; the public facilities requirement . I' l Special Conditions : 1 . Blow-sand protection shall be provided on al-1 sides of the project . 2 . The necessary right-of-way dedication shall be deeded at recordation . 3. All improvements shall be constructed in accordance with the Palm Desert Subdivision Standards. 4. Sidewalks shall be provided on Monterey and Country Club Drive . Sidewalks adjacent to the commercial area shall be 10 foot in width. 5. A decorative block wall, 6 feet in height, as shown on Sheet 4 of the plans, shall be required adjacent to Lots 13 to 20, Lot 102, and Lots 36 to 41. 6. No ingress or egress to any of the lots shall be provided from Monterey Avenue excepting at "A" Street . 7. Traffic safety lighting shall be provided at "A" Street at both ends thereof. 8 . Applicant shall make a $15, 000 contribution towards the signalization of the intersection at Country Club Drive and .Monterey . 9. All drainage shall be engineered and approved by the Director of Public Works. 10. Applicant shall dedicate sufficient land along Monterey Avenue to provide for a 34 foot half width and a 16 foot parkway which shall include an 8 ' slightly meandering bike path and intensive landscap- ing. 11. Cul-de-sac at the end of "H" Street shall be shortened to provide at least 35 feet of frontage for Lots 47 & 48. Lots 46 - 50 shall be adjusted to incorporate the additional land area so that none of the lots shall be less than 8 , 000 sq. ft . `( 12. All residential lots shall be a minimum of 8 , 000 sq . ft . and all `- development shall conform to all requirements of said Zone District . 13. Subject to approval of the Director of Public Works , adequate traffic safety provisions shall be made and methods of improving traffic cir- culation in the vicinity shall be provided at the intersection of .Monterey and Country Club . 14. Plan 2116 shall be deleted. _ _ I PLA:d:.I.>"0 RESOLUTION S0. 370 April 25, 1973 Paul A. Williams Director of Environmental Services City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 Reference: Tentative Tract No. 11791 (Residential area only) Provide the following fire protection: I. Install a water system capable of delivering 1500 GPG1 fire flaw from any fire hydrant for a two hour duration in addition to domestic suooly. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flo:j is measured at the time of measurement, 2. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants locatedtersection at each street in i (a) but not greater than 500 feet apart in any direction. A. Exterior surface of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yelle.a, and the tops and nozzle caps shall .be painted green. B. Curbs shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. 3. Prior to recordation of the final map, the developer shall furnish the original and three (3) copies of the water system plan to the Fire Marshal for review. 4. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and aporcved by the water company, with the following certification : "I certify that the design of the water system in Tract No. 11791 requirements y is in accordance with the prescribed b the Fire ;1arshal . ' Upon approval , the original plan will be returned to the developer. Very truly yours , David L. Flake Fire Chief I David J. Grterel fCepucy Fire 1arshal CITY OF PALM DESERT STAFF REPORT To: Planning Commission Report On: Tentative Tract Map Applicant: MCBAIL COMPANY Case No. : TT 11791 Date: June 14, 1978 I . REQUEST: Request for approval of a Tentative Tract Map to create 101 single-family residential lots and 3 lots to provide for a District Commercial Center, a common recreation area and open space from a 40 acre parcel located within the P.C. (2) (Planned Commercial , District) and R-2 8,000(8) (Single- family residential , 8,000 sq. ft. min. lot area, 8,000 sq. ft. of site area/du) zones, Upon Annexation, at the southeast corner of Country Club Drive and Monterey Avenue. II. STAFF RECOMMENDATION : Recommend approval of the Tentative Tract Map to the City Council by Plan- ning Commission Resolution No. 370. Justification: 1 . The subject Tentative Map does substantially comply with Chapter 26 of the City of Palm Desert Municipal Code, and the State of California Subdivision Map Act, as amended. 2. The subject Tentative Map does comply with the adopted General Plan and the Palm Desert Zoning Ordinance. 3. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed. 4. The site is physically suited for the proposed density of the develop- ment. 5. The design of the subdivision and the proposed iriiprovements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or serious health pro- blems. III. BACKGROUND: A. Tract Size: Approximately 40 acres (28.5 acres for residential ) B. Proposed Lots: 1 - 101 Residential , Single-family detached 102-103 Common Recreational Area 104 Commercial C. Zoning for Subject Property: R-2 8,000(8)U.A. D. Adjacent Zoning: North - Riverside County Zoning South - PR-5 , U.A. East - PR-5, U.A. West - Riverside County Zoning E. Proposed Density: Approximately 2.8 du/acre Case No. TT 11791 May 17, 1978 Page Two III. BACKGROUND: (Cont. ) F. Environmental Finding : The Director of Environmental Services has determined on April 24, 1978 that the project will not have a significant adverse effect on the environment. G. Utilities : Power - Southern California Edison Water - C.V.C.W.D. Sewer - C.V.C.W.D. Natural Gas - Southern California Gas Telephone - General Telephone Co. IV. DISCUSSION: One of the principal concerns with regard to this project, due to its location , is blowsand and appropriate methods of controlling it. Special Condition No. 1 requires that blow-sand protection be provided on all sides of the project, yet the condition allows flexibility as to the means neces- sary to control the sand. Special Condition No. 5 requies a 6 foot block wall on the north side of Lots 13-20, Lot 102 and Lots 36-41 which represent the northern portion of the residential tract. Special Condition No. 11 involves both right-of-way required on Monterey Avenue and landscaping which will serve as a means of blowsand control on the western portion of the tract along Monterey. Traffic circulation will be no problem in the area. Ingress and egress shall be restricted onto Monterey Avenue except at 'A' Street. . A $15,000 contri- bution toward the signalization of the intersection of Country Club Drive and Monterey i.s being required. Dedication is being required along Monterey to provide for a 34 foot half width and a 16 foot parkway which shall include an 8' .slightly meandering bike path. Special Condition No. 12 requires one minor change. with regard to circulation, the cul -de-sac at the end of 'H' Street is to be shortened to provide a minimum of 35 feet of frontage for Lots 47 & 48. Public improvements required include sidewalks on Monterey and Country Club Drive; those adjacent to the commercial area to be 10 feet in width. Staff has received a letter from the City of Rancho Mirage regarding Case No. DP 03-78, the commercial portion of the project under discussion. Some of the comments , however, actually pertain to the tentative tract map pre- sently being discussed. The City of Rancho Mirage's first comment pertains to the proximity at which residential and commercial uses would be located in this project and this is said not to be a good mix. Staff believes this comment is invalid as there will be a 20 foot buffer with a block wall be- tween the. residential and commercial portions of the project. The Planning Commission has previously approved a project with mixed uses , the El Paseo Village project on the south side of E1 Paseo between Sun Lodge and Lupine and believed the two uses were compatible on a much smaller site than the present site. Projects done elsewhere, including one in Palm Springs, in- dicate that residential projects adjacent to well-designed commercial pro- jects can be highly successful . The City of Rancho Mirage also contends that many of the residential lots are irregular and too small in area. The Staff believes that the irregular shaped lots and flag lots create a much more interesting residential tract and pro- vide the developer with flexibility to provide interesting and diverse site plans and landscaping. With regard to density, at 3.5 du/acre the proposed project does not exceed Rancho Mirages 's recommended 3.0 du/acre significantly. In addition , the developer is providing a large common recreation area which will adequately compensate for some of the area lacking in the individual lots. The City of Rancho Mirage also contends that Monterey and Country Club should have traffic signals. This concern is being addressed as previously indicated by Special Condition No. 8 Case No. TT 11791 June 14, 1978 Page Three IV. DISCUSSION (Cont. ) The present Tentative Tract Map contains revisions required by the Commission at the May 17th meeting. The "H" Street cul -de-sac has been shortened, the 4' x 20' landscape easements along Monterey Avenue deleted, and a number of lot lines adjusted to create 8,000 square feet minimum lots for all lots. More detailed calculations of lot areas will be made by the Department of Public Works at the final map review stage, but Special Condition No. 12 guarantees that the 8,000 square feet minimum will be adhered to. The Revised Tentative Map submitted indicates that all lots will be a minimum of 8,000 square feet. Q$,&J, 6 F; City of RANCHO MIRAGE ` z 69 825 HIGHWAY 111 RANCHO MIRAGE CALIFORNIA 92270 TELEPHONE (]I433288871 May 4, 1978 Mr. Paul A. Williams, Director Environmental Services City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, CA 92260 Re: Case No. DP-03-78, application by McGail Company Dear Mr. Williams: This is to report to you that on April 26, 1978, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Mirage discussed Case DP-03-78 as transmitted by your office. The location of the project is on the southeast corner of Country Club and Monterey and consists of 40 acres to be used for a commercial develop- ment and single family development. I am aware that your request was to have the information returned to your office by April 25, 1978, but because the Planning Commission did not meet until April 26, 1978, their recommendation is being sent to you at this time. Attached you will find a letter dated April 21 , 1978 from Mr. William Probert, City Manager, addressed to Mayor Ed Mullins , asking for an extension of time to allow the Planning Commission an opportunity to comment. The. City Planning Commission recommends denial of Case DP-03-78 subject to the following reasons as outlined in staff report dated April 20, 1978. 1 . The commercial activity being proposed so close to the proposed use by single family residences is not a good mix. 2. The plan shows Monterey Avenue as having a 50' dedication for a half width street. The City's General Plan indicates Monterey as a 55 ' half width street with an ultimate full width dedication of 1101 . 3. The lot size as provided in the residential area is a minimum 8,000 sq.ft. and the Commission feels this minimum is too small and should at least be compatible with the City' s minimum of 10,000 sq. ft. Plany of the lots within the residential development are irregular in shape and have street frontages as small as 20 ' . This does not meet the City's minimum design standards and the Commission feels this small frontage causes problems in the future and is not good design. The density of the residential project is 3.5 units per acre, exceeding the density of 3 units per acre per City of Rancho Mirage requirements. It is not a desirable density. 4. Monterey and Country Club should have signals at this location. Page 2 Re: Case No. DP-03-78 Please see attached excerpt from Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of April 26, 1978. Thank you for the opportunity of allowing the City of Rancho Mirage to review and comment on the proposed development. PATRICK h1. PRATT Administrative Assistant Pr1P:grb Attachments ante�u�� Regular Planning Commission Meeting April 26, 197S 9y Mr. Pratt presented the referral from the City of palm Desert regarding P ,Li•i DESE; Case No. OP 03-73, District Commercial Center, to be located at the south- P,EFEDRAL east corner of Country cial activity proposed isuttoorive closenttoiontere proposed single familythe residences. CONMERCIA'DISRICT They also propose 8,000 sq. ft. lots, which are too small . The density of CENTER the project would be 3.5 units per acre, which is greater than that allo.ied by Rancho !Mirage. Also, with the way the lots are laid out, many are flag lots and would only have about 20 ft. frontage on the street, Which is bad. Staff recommends transmitting City's recommendation of denial on the project. It was moved by Commissioner ifcFadden, seconded by Commissioner Murray,that a letterMOTION be sent to the City of Palm Desert stating the Planning Commission recommends denial of the proposed District Commercial Cen for the reasons outlined in the report by staff. ter t Hearing no objections, it was so ordered. k INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM City of Palm Desert TO: Planning Commission FROM: Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Tentative Tract No. 11791 DATE: April 19th, 1978 1. Sand blow protection shall be provided for this tract on three sides, excluding Country Club Drive. 2. The necessary right of way dedication shall be deeded at recordation. 3. All improvements shall be constructed in accordance with the Palm Desert Subdivision Standards. 4. Sidewalks shall be provided on Monterey and Country Club Drive. Note the sidewalks adjacent to the commercial area shall be 10 foot in width. 5. A concrete block wall , 6 feet in height shall be required adjacent to Lots 13 to 20, Lot 102, and Lots 36 to 41. 6. No ingress or egress to any of the lots shall be provided from Monterey Avenue excepting at a street, 7. Traffic safety lighting shall be provided at "A" street at both ends thereof. 8. This tract shall make a contribution towards a signalization intersection at Country Club Drive and Monterey, to the extent of $5,000.00. 9. All drainage shall be engineered and approved by the Director of Public Works. 3700 CENTRAL AVENUE RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA R.W.RIDDELL Eastern Division Distribution Planning Supervisor Mailing Address P.O. BOX 2200, RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92516 Location of Nearest Gas Main: Country Club Dr. at Palm Greens Pko� April 25, 1978 City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, California 92260 Re: Tent Tract 11791 This letter is not to be interpreted as a contractual commitment to serve the proposed project; . but only as an information service. Its intent is to notify you that the Southern Cal ifornia Gas Company has facilities in the area where tiie above named project is proposed. Gas service to the project could be provided from an existing main h,ithout any significant impact on the environment. The service would be in accordance with the Company's policies and extension rules on file with the California Public Utilities Cor;missicn at the time contractual arrangements are made. The availability of natural gas service, as set forth in this letter, is based upon present conditions of gas supply and regulatory policies. As a public utility, the Southern California Gas Company is under, the jurisdiction of .the California Public Utilities Commission. We can also be Affprtprl by a,r`tionS i)f fridprRl reotllatory anenrieS, Shr,l;lH.J . these. agencies tare any action whic'r. affects gas supply or the condition under which service is available, gas service will be provided in accordance with revised conditions. We have developed several programs which are available, upon request, to provide assistance in selecting the n;ost effective applications of energy conservation techniques for a particular project. If you desire further information on any of our energy conservation programs , please contact this office for assistance. IV RWR:blc »= ENVIRONP,4EN7,>L 5::: vtCES CITY OF PALM DCSRT TO: Mr. Paul A. Williams, Director of Environmental Services City of Palm Desert FROM: Lloyd W. Rogers, R.S. , Supervising Sanitarian Riverside County Health Department - Desert District DATE: April 25, 1973 SUBJECT: TT 11791 Duo to the fact that domestic ..Pier and sanitar y scwor is to be provided by Coachella Valley County 'Water District. -n ri f ENTRONMENTAL SERVICES CIN OF PALM DESERT July 13, 1978 CITY OF PALM DESERT TRANSMITTAL LETTER. I . TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council II . REQUEST: Request for approval of a Tentative Tract Map to create 101 single-family residential lots and 3 lots to provide for a District Commercial Center, a common recreation area and open space from a 40 acre parcel located within the P.C. (2) (Planned Commercial , District) and R-2 8,000(8) (Single- family residential , 8,000 sq. ft. min. lot area, 8,000 sq. ft. of site area/du) zones, Upon Annexation, at the south- east corner of Country Club Drive and Monterey Avenue. III. CASE NO. : TT 11791 , Mc Bail Company, Applicant IV. CONTENTS: A. Staff Recommendation. B. Draft Resolution/)MXNftfX>[ No. 78-89 C. Review of major issues discussed by the Planningg Commission. (See P.C. minutes of meeting of May 17, T978. D. Planning Commission Resolution No. 370 . E. Planning Commission Staff Report dated May 17, 1978 F. Portion of Planning Commission minutes dealing with the subject request. G. Related maps and/or exhibits. A. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Tentative Tract subject to the Conditions of Approval by Resolution No. 78-89. Justification is based upon the following: 1 . The subject Tentative Map does substantially comply with Chapter 26 of the City of Palm Desert Municipal Code, and the State of California Subdivision Map Act, as amended. 2. The subject Tentative Map does comply with the adopted General Plan and the Palm Desert Zoning Ordinance. 3. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed. 4. The site is physically suited for the proposed density of the development. 5. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or serious health pro- blems. RESOLUTION NO. 78-89 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, SETTING FORTH ITS FINDINGS AND APPROVING A TENTATIVE MAP TO CREATE 101 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS AND 3 LOTS TO PROVIDE FOR A DISTRICT COMMERCIAL CENTER, A COMMON RECREATION AREA AND OPEN SPACE FROM A 40 j ACRE PARCEL LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF i COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE AND MONTEREY AVENUE . CASE NO. TT 11791 WHEREAS , the City Council of the City of Palm Desert did hold a duly noticed Public Hearing on July 13 , 1978, to consider an applica- tion from the MCBAIL COMPANY, requesting approval of a Tentative Tract Map to create 101 single-family residential lots and 3 lots to provide for a District Commercial Center , a common recreation area and open space from a 40 acre parcel located within the P .C . (2) (Planned Commer- cial , District) and R-2 8, 000 (Single-family residential , 8, 000 sq . ft . of site area/du) zones , Upon Annexation , at the southeast corner of Country Club Drive and Monterey Avenue, more particularly described as : APN 621-190-045-8 APN 621-150-002-9 WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Environmental Quality Procedure Resolution No . 78-32" in that the Director of Environmental Services has developed an expanded initial study on the pre-zoning Case No . C/Z 01-78 which in- cludes the subject property and weighs the environmental impacts of said project , and this consideration has been determined to be an on- going project ; and, WHEREAS, the City Council did take into consideration the Tenta- tive Map as submitted, and the reports of the various reviewing agencies ; and, WHEREAS , the City Council did find that the subject Tentative Map does substantially comply with Chapter 26 of the City of Palm Desert Municipal Code, and the State of California Subdivision Map Act , as amended; and, WHEREAS, the City Council did find that the subject Tentative Map does comply with the adopted General Plan and the Palm Desert Zon- ing Ordinance ; and, WHEREAS , the City Council did find that the site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and, WHEREAS, the City Council did find that the site is physically suited for the proposed density of the development ; and, WHEREAS, the City Council did find that the design of the sub- division and the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substan- tial environmental damage or serious health problems . r 4 NOW, THEREFORE , BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Palm Desert, as follows : 1 . That the above recitations are true and correct and consti- tute the findings of the Council in this case; 2 . That it does hereby require that the applicant pay a fee in an amount determined under the Ordinance provisions in order to comply with Article 26. 15 of the City ' s Subdivision Ordinance regarding the public facilities requirement ; RESOLUTION NO . 78-89 Page Two 3 . That it does hereby approve the above described Tentative Map No. 11791 , subject to fulfillment of the attached conditions . PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert City Council held on this day of 1978, by the following vote , to wit : AYES : NOES : ABSENT: I ABSTAIN : EDWARD D. MULLINS , Mayor ATTEST: SHEILA R. GILLIGAN, City Clerk City of Palm Desert , California 1 RESOLUTION NO. '78-89 Page Three CO';D I T IO-CS OF .11'PRO1 .'',L CASE NO . TT 1L79i Standard Conditions : 1 . The development of the property described herein shall be sub. ec, to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein v:hich are in addition to all municipal ordinances and State and Federal now in force., or which hereafter may be in force . statutes 2. Full public improvements including traffic safety lighting as required by Ordinance and the Director of Public works , shall be installed in accordance with City standards . 3. The C.C. &R' s for this development shall be submitted to the Director of Public works for review and approval prior to the issuance of any building permits . Prior to recordation of the final subdivision man , the applicant shall submit to the Director of Public [forks : a. The document to convey title . b. Covenants and restrictions to be recorded including a single story limitation for buildings . C. Management and maintenance agreement to be entered into with the owners of the units of the project . 4. Improvement plans for water and sewer system shall meet the require- ments of the respective service districts . 5. Area shall be annexed to appropriate Improvement Districts having jurisdiction over the subject area. ( 6. All dedicated land and/or easements required by this approval shall IIbe granted to the City of Palm Desert , without cost to the City-and free of all liens and encumbrances . 7. All on-site utilities, including cable TV, shall be placed under- ground and shall be completely concealed from view except certain appurtenances as may be approved by the Director of Environmental Services. 8. Complete plans and specifications shall be submitted as required by Ordinance to the Director of Public works for checking and approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. The sub- divider shall submit "as-built" plans prior to acceptance of the subdivision improvements by the City. 9. In order to maintain reasonable fire protection during the construc- tion period , the subdivider shall maintain passable vehicular access to all buildings . An adequate number of fire hydrants with the re- quired fire flows shall be installed as recommended by the Fire 11ar- shal . 10. All requirements of the City Fire Marshal shall be met as a part of the development of this tract per attached memorandum. 11 . Drainage shall be subject to approval of the Director of Public ij works . Applicant shall provide engineered data as recuested . _ 12. All requirements of the Planning Commission action on related Case No . Dp 03-78 shall be met as a part of the development of this tract . 13 . The total number of lots shall be limited to 10<1 . 14 . The applicant shall have twelve ( 12 ) months from the date of the approval or conditional approval of the tentative map for filing of the final map unless an extension of time of up to eighteen ( 18) months is granted by a Resolution of the City Council . R_S0L TI S0 . 78-89 Page Four 15 . The apnLi,�tt:!r siaii ;;:z : t , rti pursuant r ; .lrticl 3ri . 33 Citv ' s subd ": isiun Ordinance �ardiu� thc nubLi . � rcquiramc_nt . ' Lacu i t.i_s.. r 1I f Special Conditions : 1 . Blow-sand protection shall be provided on al-1 sides of the project . 2 . The necessary right-of-way dedication shall be deeded at recordation . 3. All improvements shall be constructed in accordance with the Palm Desert Subdivision Standards . 4. Sidewalks shall be provided on Monterey and Country Club Drive . Sidewalks adjacent to the commercial area shall be 10 foot in -sidth, 5. A decorative block wall, 6 feet in height, as shoran on Sheet 4 of the plans. shall be required adjacent to Lots 13 to 20, Lot 102, and Lots 36 to 41. 6. No ingress or egress to any of the lots shall be provided from Monterey Avenue excepting at "A" Street . ` 7. Traffic safety lighting shall be provided at "A" Street at both l ends thereof . 8 . Applicant shall make a $15 , 000 contribution towards the sigr.alization of the intersection at Country Club Drive and Monterey . 9. All drainage shall be engineered and approved by the Director of Public Works . 10. Applicant shall dedicate sufficient land along Monterey Avenue to provide for a 34 foot half width and a 16 foot parkway which shall include an 8 ' slightly meandering bike path and intensive landscap- ing. 11. Cul-de-sac at the end of "H" Street shall be shortened to provide at least 35 feet of frontage for Lots 47 & 48 . Lots 46 - 50 s :ail be adjusted to incorporate the additional land area so that none of the lots shall be less than 8 , 000 sq . ft . 12. All residential lots shall be a minimum of 8 , 000 sq . ft . and all `l development shall conform to all requirements of said Zone District , 13. Subject to approval of the Director of Public Works , adequate traffic safety provisions shall be made and methods of improving traffic cir- culation in the vicinity shall be provided at the intersection of Monterey and Country Club . 14. Plan 2116 shall be deleted. RESOLUTION NO. 78-89 Page Five April 25, 1973 I Paul A. Williams Director of Environmental Services City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, Ca. 92250 I Reference: Tentative Tract No. 11791 (Residential area only) Provide the following fire protection: 1 . Install a dater system capable of delivering 1500 GPl fire flow from any fire hydrant for a two hour duration in addition to dcmestic supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement. 2. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants located at each street intersection (a) but not greater than 500 feet apart in any direction. A. Exterior surface of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chro,,,e yellow, and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted areen. B. Curbs shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. 3. Prior to recordation of the final map, the developer shall furnish the original and three (3) copies of the water system plan to the Fire Marshal for 4. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and ap rpv�d by the water company, with the following certification: "I certify teat t;,e design of the water system in Tract No. 11791 is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Fire F?arshal . " Upon approval , the original pi =_p will be returned to the developer. Very truly yours , David L. Flake Fire Chief Gav d Lrt-gel �_ Lepucy Pi re tdarsnai PALM DESERT PLANNING C0rMISSI 0? :.iL TI:. ; WEDNESD A'i - 1A7 17 , L978 - 1 : 00 P . M% - CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS I . CALL TO ORDER The regular meecinj or the Palm Desert Planning Commission was called to order by Chairman Berkey at 1 : 00 p . m. in the Council Chambers of the Palm Desert: City Hall . II . PLEDGE - Commissioner Kelly III . ROLL CALL Present : Commissioner KELLY Commissioner KRYDER Commissioner SNYDER Chairman BERKEY Others Present : Paul A. Williams - Director of Environmental Services Ralph Cipriani - Associate Planner Clyde Beebe - Director of Public Works Kathy Shorey - Planning Secretary IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A . MINUTES of the regular meeting of May 2 , 193 of the Planning Commission . On a motion by Commissioner Kelly, seconded by Commissioner Kryder, the minutes were approved as written;carried unanimously (4-0) . V. WRITTEN C0MMUNICATIONS - None VI . PUBLIC HEARINGS Chairman Berkey explained the Public Hearing procedures to those present . A . Case No. C/Z 01-78 - INITIATED BY PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION Request for approval of a Planning Commission initiated Change of Zone for pre-zoning approximately 1 , 047 acres from ' S ' Study to P . C. (2) (B .A. ) , R-2 8 , 000( S ) (U.A . ) , R-1 12 , 000 (U .A . ) , PR-5 (U.A . ) , PR-4 (U.A . ) , O . S . (B . A. ) , PR-3 ( U.A . ) , PR210 U.A . ) or any other zone deemed appro- priate on property generally located between Country Club Drive and the Whitewater Storm Channel and between Monterey Avenue and Cook Street . Mr . Williams reviewed the Staff Report and noted a map showing the proposed zoning and circulation pattern . He also referred to a ler.ter ' received from Sir. Hirsch and his request for an average of R-1-7, 500 sq . ft . as a zoning designation . Chairman Berkey asked what the time restraints were on this mat- ter . Mr. Williams noised that the Commission could deliberate indeCi- nently. Chairman Berkey asked for further reasoning with regard to the R-2-8 , 000 zone designation . Mr. Williams noted that it is adja- cent to commercial and it is better to develop the commercial and re- sidential together to help form a buffer for the rest of the develop- ment . Palm Desert Plan_. Ln sion Mav 1_7 , 1978 Commissioner Kelly asked how accurate the summary of ,roposr�d students in the area was . %tr . 4.111ic11TIs noted tlint 70' the arc�,nu� would probably be more accurate . Commissioner Kryder noted that Mr . llirsch ' s reasons for an average zoning of 11.-1-7500 sq. ft . are valid reasons and should be considered . Chairman Berkey declared the Public Hearing and asked if ._� there was anyone wishing to speak on the matter . F. N. 11CDONALD, Long Beach , owner of 40 acres on / the southwest , southwest corner of Section 9 , told '£he Commission of his conversation with the various neighbors in the area of his sand dunes and how i they and he were in favor of the Open Space desig- nation being changed. He also noted that the sand- dunes are being destroyed by 4 things : the sage brush , dune buggies , adjacent developments , and the City protecting them. Mr . McDonald stated that the whole area should be reserved as a sand dune preserve or none of it . 11R. RAFF, owner of 3 . 95 acres , a homestead parcel located on Monterey and Hovely Lane , asked to have it clarified how the proposed zoning would affect the small land owner such as himself . Mr . Williams stated that as the pre-zoning was being done as a single project , individual property owners 'would be exempt from the minimum site area required to obtain a Change of Zone to the P-R zone . As a result , in- dividual property owners would be able to develop under the PR zone no matter what acreage they owned once the pre-zoning is approved for the entire area. He further stated that this zoning designation would . limit the area to condos and residential homes . Chair- man Berkey noted that the staff would then be the co- ordinator for all the property in the area . Mr. Ruff stated that he must dedicate land for road use . Mr . Williams noted that since Hovely Lane already exists that there should be no problem. RICHARD ARNOLD . 73-722 Santa Rosa, an adjacent developer told of his experiences in other areas with sand dunes , and he noted that adjacent development would stop the sand dunes from being sand dunes as it takes sand to make sand dunes . EUNICE PIERSON, representing Mr. Hirsch, noted that Mr . Hirsch would appreciate further consideration of his request for 8 , 000 sq . ft . average per lot . SID HANDY, Aster Drive , 1S year resident , spoke in op- position to a open space in the middle of the City . MRS . JOHN QUINN, stated she had a petition with 56-58 signatures against the open space zoning , noting that it is a poor concept . DENNIS HEALY, Attorney for `Ir . McDonald , spoke in op- position to the open space zoning and presented pictures of the sand dunes in the area. JIM 1(CKEE , 73-500 Joshua Tree , owner at Portola Country Club , stated his opposition to the open space zoning. 4I . PUBLIC HEARINGS (Cont A. Case No . C/7. OI-78 (ConL . ) GEORGE MARZICOLA , President of Country Club Property Owners Association , noted he is generally in agreement with the proposed zoning and annexation . lie stated that the extension of streets and the improvements of others should be taken into consideration with a bridge considered on Cook Street . Further he noted that the Association is opposed to annexations because of the Excise Tax involved. RICHARD GUELICH, Santa Cruz , noted the extensive work that the Staff had put into the report on the nre- zoning and he noted his concern for the ability of the City to maintain the open space . Chairman Berkey stated that he felt the case should be continued for further review. Commissioner Kelly stated that more input is needed on the utilities in the area and the maintenance of the sand dunes . Commissioner Kryder indicated more information was needed on the traffic situation . Commissioner Snyder asked that Staff be able to answer the questions regarding maintenance of the open space and alternatives to an open space zoning designation . i On a motion by Commissioner Kryder, seconded by Commissioner Kelly, the Commission continued Case C/Z 01-73 to June 14 , 1978 for further review and study ; carried unanimously (4-0) . B. Case Nos . DP 03-78 and SOC - 11CBAIL COMPANY , Applicant i Mr . Williams noted that these cases and Case No . TT 11791 should be continued to June 14 , 1978 also due to the action of the Commission on the pre-zoning. MIKE GALLAGHER , representing the applicant , noted his agreement with the continuance . C. Case No. TT 11791 , continued as noted above . D. Case No. CUP 07-76 - HENRY TAGLE , Applicant Request for approval of an extension of time for an approved Conditional Use Permit to allow the construc- tion of a restaurant with Variances from parking re- quirements and setback requirements on property located at the northwest corner of Palm Desert Drive and San Carlos avenue. Mr. Williams reviewed the case and noted that the Commission had approved a previous extension of one year . Chairman Berkey declared the Public Hearing open and asked the applicant if he wished to speak at this time . RICHARD HOLDEN , representing the applicant , stated he was available to answer any questions . Commis- sioner Snyder asked why the delay . Mr . Holden stated that there was a problem with funding due to the size of the interior of the restauant . Further , the only problem that now exists is the line-of-site problem but that should be resolved with the Redevelopment plans for that area of the City. 6✓N.3 �'wf £d� � Y., � ,.. . ' arrrr'4 �Y�+,�'-+�..T'rw,r•�,.x,',', p*��-r°--''"C!` "?�:is�'�s g�� xs�t�«�-'l'"'Trhgr�s }•�f�� i... ..,rr JVM i�•.W..f ..-4�,' b,.r §� .....c.n !r+yCo+, J.,,1.t ....r.... a -!t-.wry �..�+.�-t 7'�,rs•"A r f, ,M b wj•..l:.rw y i,�i '��r�•.'^u1�>��r`»-.,"-,y"�'�'�'i.'�E".">7"t:N.ttx�.';a.Wwtiv�;'Jt�ll�".a r?t.L+"�t�' t.�;?ci,-}'n.ri-��'}�.k7f�t-i .w*C SfJ4-'Y.�c.7_- a-_ _ ! PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 370 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, SETTING FORTH ITS FIND- INGS AND RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNTCIL, APPROVAL OF A TENTATIVE MAP TO CREATE 101 SINGLE-FAMILY RE- SIDENTIAL LOTS AND 3 LOTS TO PROVIDE FOR A DISTRICT COMMERCIAL CENTER, A COMMON RECREATION AREA AND OPEN SPACE FROM A 40 ACRE PARCEL LOCATED AT TIME SOUTHEAST CORNER OF COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE AND MONTEREY AVENUE . CASE NO. TT 11791 WHEREAS , the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert , California, did receive a verified application from the MCBAIL COMPANY, requesting approval of a Tentative Tract Map to create 101 single- family residential lots and 3 lots to provide for a District Commercial Center , a common recreation area and open space from a 40 acre parcel located within the P.C . (2) (Planned Commercial , District ) and R-2 8 , 000 (Single-family residential , 8 , 000 sq . ft . of site area/du) zones , Upon Annexation , at the southeast corner of Country Club Drive and Monterey Avenue, more particularly described as : APN 621-190-045-8 APN 621-150-002-9 WHEREAS , said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Environmental duality Procedure Resolution No. 78-32 in that the Director of Environmental Services has developed an expanded initial study on the Prezoning Case No. C/Z O1-78 which includes the subject property and weighs the environmental impacts of said project , and this consideration has been determined to be an on-going project ; and, WHEREAS , the Planning Commission did take into consideration the Tentative Map as submitted, and the reports of the various reviewing agencies; and, WHEREAS , the Planning Commission did find that the subject Tenta- tive Map does substantially comply with Chapter 26 of the City of Palm Desert Municipal Code, and the State of California Subdivision Map Act , as amended; and, WHEREAS , the Planning Commission did find that the subject Tenta- tive Map does comply with the adopted General Plan and the Palm Desert Zoning Ordinance ; and, WHEREAS , the Planning Commission did find that the site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and, WHEREAS , the Planning Commission did find that the site is physically suited for the proposed density of the development ; and , WHEREAS , the Planning Commission did find that the design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements are not likely to cause sub- stantial environmental damage or serious health problems . NOW, THEREFORE , BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert , as follows : 1 . That the above recitations are true and correct and consti- tute the findings of the Commission in this case; 2 . That it does hereby recommend that the applicant pay a fee in an amount determined under the Ordinance provisions in order to com- ply with Article 26 . 15 of the City ' s Subdivision Ordinance regarding the public facilities requirement ; PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 370 Page Two 3. That it does hereby recommend approval to the City Council of the City of Palm Desert of the above described Tentative Map No . 11791 , subject to fulfillment of the attached conditions . PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission held on this 14th day of June, 1978 by the following vote , to wit : AYES : BERKEY, FLESI{MAN, KELLY, KRYDER, SNYDER I NOES : NONE ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE GEURGE BERKEY, Ch irman ATTEST : PAUL A. WILLIAMS, Secretary /ks t PLANNING COMAISS10N RESOLUTION NO. 370 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO . TT 11791 Standard Conditions : 1 . The development of the property' described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein which are in addition to all municipal, ordinances and State and Federal statutes now in force, or which hereafter may be in force . 2. Full public improvements including traffic safety lighting as required by Ordinance and the Director of Public works , shall be installed in accordance with City standards . 3. The C.C. &R' s for this development shall be submitted to the Director of Public works for review and approval prior to the issuance of any building permits . Prior to recordation of the final subdivision map , the applicant shall submit to the Director of Public works : a. The document to convey title . b. Covenants and restrictions to be recorded including a single story limitation for buildings . C. management and maintenance agreement to be entered into with the owners of the units of the project . 4. Improvement plans for water and sewer system shall meet the require- ments of the respective service districts . 5. Area shall be annexed to appropriate Improvement Districts having jurisdiction over the subject area. 6. All dedicated land and/or easements required by this approval shall be granted to the City of Palm Desert , without cost to the City and free of all liens and encumbrances. 7. All on-site utilities , including cable TV, shall be placed under- ground and shall be completely concealed from view except certain appurtenances as may be approved by the Director of Environmental Services . 8. Complete plans and specifications shall be submitted as required by Ordinance to the Director of Public works for checking and approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. The sub- divider shall submit "as-built" plans prior to acceptance of the subdivision improvements by the City. 9. In order to maintain reasonable fire protection during the construc- tion period, the subdivider shall maintain passable vehicular access to all buildings . An adequate number of fire hydrants with the re- quired fire flows shall be installed as recommended by the Fire mar- shal . 10. All requirements of the City Fire marshal shall be met as a part of the development of this tract per attached memorandum. 11 . Drainage shall be subject to approval of the Director of Public Works . Applicant shall provide engineered data as requested. I 12 . All requirements of the Planning Commission action on related Case No. DP 03-78 shall be met as a part of the development of this tract . 13 . The total number of lots shall be limited to 104 . 14 . The applicant shall have twelve (12 ) months from the date of the approval or conditional approval of the tentative map for filing of the final map unless an extension of time of up to eighteen ( 18) months is granted by a Resolution of the City Council . PLANNI_:G C0','MISSION RESOLUTION NO. 370 15 . The applicant shall pav ices pursuant to ,Article 26 . 25 of the City ' s Subdivision Ordinance re_-ard; n<g the public Cacti lties requirement . Ii Special Conditions : 1 . Blow-sand protection shall be provided on al-1 sides of the project . 2 . The necessary right-of-way dedication shall be deeded at recordation . 3. All improvements shall be constructed in accordance with the Palm Desert Subdivision Standards . 4 . Sidewalks shall be provided on Monterey and Country Club Drive . Sidewalks adjacent to the commercial area shall be 10 foot in width . 5 . A decorative block wall, 6 feet in height, as shown on Sheet 4 of the plans, shall be required adjacent to Lots 13 to 20, Lot 102, and Lots 36 to 41. 6. No ingress or egress to any of the lots shall be provided from Monterey Avenue excepting at "A" Street . 7. Traffic safety lighting shall be provided at "A" Street at both ends thereof. 8 . Applicant shall make a $15 , 000 contribution towards the signalization of the intersection at Country Club Drive and Monterey . 9. All drainage shall be engineered and approved by the Director of Public Works . 10. Applicant shall dedicate sufficient land along Monterey Avenue to provide for a 34 foot half width and a 16 foot parkway which shall include an 8 ' slightly meandering bike path and intensive landscap- ing. 11. Cul-de-sac at the end of "H" Street shall be shortened to provide at least 35 feet of frontage for Lots 47 & 48 Lots 46 - 50 shall be adjusted to incorporate the additional land area so that none of the lots shall be less than 8 , 000 sq. ft . 12. All residential lots shall be a minimum of 8 , 000 sq. ft . and all `- development shall conform to all requirements of said Zone District . 13. Subject to approval of the Director of Public Works , adequate traffic safety provisions shall be made and methods of improving traffic cir- culation in the vicinity shall be provided at the intersection of Monterey and Country Club . 14. Plan 2116 shall be deleted. PL.:r:\ISG .fISSIO': 3 .i'—ESOLUTION S0. 370 April 25, 1973 Paul A. Williams Director of Environmental Services City of Palm Desert 45-275 PA.ckly Pear Lane Palm Des t, Ca. 92260 Reference: Tentative Tract No. 11791 (Residential area only) Provide the following fire protection: 1 . Install a water system capable of delivering 1500 GPM fire flow from any fire hydrant for a two hour duration in addition to domestic supply.computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure The in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement. 2. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants located at each street intersection 1 (a) but not greater than 500 feet apart in any direction. A. Exterior surface of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellmi, and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. B. Curbs shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. 3. .Prior to recordation of the final map, the developer shall furnish and three (3) copies of the water system the original plan to the Fire Marshal for review. 4. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and approved by the water company, with the following certification : "I certify that the design of the water system in Tract No. 11791 requirements prescribed by the Fire Marshal . " U on�a aps inproval , accordance with the will be returned to the developer. p PProval , the original plan Very truly yours, David L. Flake Fire Chief David J. Grteeel Cepu[y Fire "larsnal CITY OF PALM DESERT STAFF REPORT To: Planning Commission Report On: Tentative Tract Map Applicant: MCBAIL COMPANY Case No. : TT 11791 Date: June 14, 1978 I . REQUEST: Request for approval of a Tentative Tract Map to create 101 single-family residential lots and 3 lots to provide for a District Commercial Center, a common recreation area and open space from a 40 acre parcel located within the P.C. (2) (Planned Commercial , District) and R-2 8,000(8) (Single- family residential , 8,000 sq. ft. min. lot area , 8,000 sq. ft. of site area/du) zones, Upon Annexation, at the southeast corner of Country Club Drive and Monterey Avenue. II. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the Tentative Tract Map to the City Council by Plan- ning Commission Resolution No. 370. Justification: 1 . The subject Tentative Map does substantially comply with Chapter 26 of the City of Palm Desert Municipal Code, and the State of California Subdivision Map Act, as amended. 2. The subject Tentative Map does comply with the adopted General Plan and the Palm Desert Zoning Ordinance. 3. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed. 4. The site is physically suited for the proposed density of the develop- ment. 5. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or serious health pro- blems. III. BACKGROUND: A. Tract Size: Approximately 40 acres (28.5 acres for residential ) B. Proposed Lots: 1 - 101 Residential , Single-family detached 102-103 Common Recreational Area 104 Commercial C. Zoning for Subject Property: R-2 8,000(8)U.A. D. Adjacent Zoning: North - Riverside County Zoning South = PR-5 , U.A. East - PR-5, U.A. West - Riverside County Zoning E. Proposed Density: Approximately 2.8 du/acre Case No. TT 11791 May 17, 1978 Page Two III. BACKGROUND: (Cont. ) F. Environmental Finding: The Director of Environmental Services has determined on April 24, 1978 that the project will not have a significant adverse effect on the environment. G. Utilities: Power - Southern California Edison Water - C.V.C.W.D. Sewer - C.V.C.W.D. Natural Gas - Southern California Gas Telephone - General Telephone Co. IV. DISCUSSION: One of the principal concerns with regard to this project, due to its location, is blowsand and appropriate methods of controlling it. Special Condition No. 1 requires that blow-sand protection be provided on all sides of the project, yet the condition allows flexibility as to the means neces- sary to control the sand. Special Condition No. 5 requies a 6 foot block wall on the north side of Lots 13-20, Lot 102 and Lots 36-41 which represent the northern portion of the residential tract. Special Condition No. 11 involves both right-of-way required on Monterey Avenue and landscaping which will serve as a means of blowsand control on the western portion of the tract along Monterey. Traffic circulation will be no problem in the area. Ingress and egress shall be restricted onto Monterey Avenue except at 'A' Street. . A $15,000 contri- bution toward the signalization of the intersection of Country Club Drive and Monterey is being required. Dedication is being required along Monterey to provide for a 34 foot half width and a 16 foot parkway which shall include an 8' slightly meandering bike path. Special Condition No. 12 requires one minor change with regard to circulation, the cul-de-sac at the end of 'H' Street is to be shortened to provide a minimum of 35 feet of frontage for Lots 47 & 48. Public improvements required include sidewalks on Monterey and Country Club Drive; those adjacent to the commercial area to be 10 feet in width. Staff has received a letter from the City of Rancho Mirage regarding Case No. DP 03-78, the commercial portion of the project under discussion. Some of the comments , however, actually pertain to the tentative tract map pre- sently being discussed. The City of Rancho Mirage's first comment pertains to the proximity at which residential and commercial uses would be located in this project and this is said not to be a good mix. Staff believes this comment is invalid as there will be a 20 foot buffer with a block wall be- tween the residential and commercial portions of the project. The Planning Commission has previously approved a project with mixed uses , the El Paseo Village project on the south side of El Paseo between Sun Lodge and Lupine and believed the two uses were compatible on a much smaller site than the present site. Projects done elsewhere, including one in Palm Springs , in- dicate that residential projects adjacent to well-designed commercial pro- jects can be highly successful . The City of Rancho Mirage also contends that many of the residential lots are irregular and too small in area. The Staff believes that the irregular shaped lots and flag lots create a much more interesting residential tract and pro- vide the developer with flexibility to provide interesting and diverse site plans and landscaping. With regard to density, at 3.5 du/acre the proposed project does not exceed Rancho Mirages's recommended 3.0 du/acre significantly. In addition , the developer is providing a large common recreation area which will adequately compensate for some of the area lacking in the individual lots. The City of Rancho Mirage also contends that Monterey and Country Club should have traffic signals. This concern is being addressed as previously indicated by Special Condition No. 8 Case No. TT 11791 June 14, 1978 Page Three IV. DISCUSSION (Cont. ) The present Tentative Tract Map contains revisions required by the Commission at the May 17th meeting. The "H" Street cul -de-sac has been shortened, the 4' x 20' landscape easements along Monterey Avenue deleted, and a number of lot lines adjusted to create 8,000 square feet minimum lots for all lots. More detailed calculations of lot areas will be made by the Department of Public Works at the final map review stage, but Special Condition No. 12 guarantees that the 8,000 square feet minimum will be adhered to. The Revised Tentative Map submitted indicates that all lots will be a minimum of 8,000 square feet. City of RANCHO MIRAGE P � F 1he 69825 HIGHWAY III RANCHO MIRAGE CALIFORNIA 92270 TELEPHONE (71d)3288871 May 4, 1978 Mr. Paul A. Williams, Director Environmental Services City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, CA 92260 Re: Case No. DP-03-78, application by Mc6ail Company Dear Mr. Williams: This is to report to you that on April 26, 1978, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Mirage discussed Case DP-03-78 as transmitted by your office. The location of the project is on the southeast corner of Country Club and Monterey and consists of 40 acres to be used for a commercial develop- ment and single family development. I am aware that your request was to have the information returned to your office by April 25, 1978, but because the Planning Commission did not meet until April 26, 1978, their recommendation is being sent to you at this time. Attached you will find a letter dated April 21 , 1978 from Mr. William Probert, City Manager, addressed to Mayor Ed Mullins , asking for an extension of time to allow the Planning Commission an opportunity to comment. The City Planning Commission recommends denial of Case DP-03-78 subject to the following reasons as outlined in staff report dated April 20, 1978. 1 . The commercial activity being proposed so close to the proposed use by single family residences is not a good mix. 2. The plan shows Monterey Avenue as having a 50 ' dedication for a half width street. The City's General Plan indicates Monterey as a 55 ' half width street with an ultimate full width dedication of 110' . 3. The lot size as provided in the residential area is a minimum 8,000 sq. ft. and the Commission feels this minimum is too small and should at least be compatible with the City' s minimum of 10,000 sq. ft. Many of the lots within the residential development are irregular in shape and have street frontages as small as 20' . This does not meet the City's minimum design standards and the Commission feels this small frontage causes problems in the future and is not good design. The density of the residential project is 3.5 units per acre, exceeding the density of 3 units per acre per City of Rancho Mirage requirements. It is not a desirable density. 4. Monterey and Country Club should have signals at this location. Page 2 Re: Case No. OP-03-78 Please see attached excerpt from Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of April 26, 1978. Thank you for the opportunity of allowing the City of Rancho Mirage to review and comment on the proposed development. PATRICK M. PRATT Administrative Assistant PM�P:grb Attachments '� v r /•T _ - i Regular Planning Commission Fleeting April 26, 1978 5y G Mr. Pratt presented the referral from the City of Palm Desert regarding PALi1 DESE: Case No. DP 03-78, District Commercial Center, to be located at the south- REFERRAL east corner of Country Club Drive and Fonterey. Staff fs the commer- DISTRICT d is too close to proposed single family residences. COii1ERCIAI They also propose 8,000 sq. ft. lots, which are too small . The density of CEi:TEP, the project would be 3.5 units per acre, which is greater than that allowed by Rancho Mirage. Also, With the tray the lots are laid out, many are flag lots and Would only have about 20 ft. frontage on the street, Which is bad_ Staff recommends transmitting City as recommendation of denial on the project. It t:as moved by Commissioner FlcFadden, seconded by Commissioner Murray,that a letter be sent to the City of Palm Desert stating the Planning NOTION Commission recommends denial of the for the reasons outlined in the report District Commercial Center P y staff. _ �s Hearing no objections, it was so ordered. E: INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM City of Palm Desert TO: Planning Commission FROM: Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Tentative Tract No. 11791 DATE: April 19th, 1978 1. Sand blow protection shall be provided for this tract on three sides, excluding Country Club Drive. 2. The necessary right of way dedication shall be deeded at recordation. 3. All improvements shall be constructed in accordance with the Palm Desert Subdivision Standards. 4. Sidewalks shall be provided on Monterey and Country Club Drive. Note the sidewalks adjacent to the commercial area shall be 10 foot in width. 5. A concrete block wall , 6 feet in height shall be required adjacent to Lots 13 to 20, Lot 102, and Lots 36 to 41.. 6. No ingress or egress to any of the lots shall be provided from Monterey Avenue excepting at a street, 7. Traffic safety lighting shall be provided at "A" street at both ends thereof. 8: This tract shall make a contribution towards a signalization intersection at Country Club Drive and Monterey, to the extent of $5,000.00. 9. All drainage shall be engineered and approved by the Director of Public Works. t 3700 CENTRAL AVENUE • RIVERSIDE. CALIFORNIA R.W.RIDDELL Eastern Division Distribution Planning Supervisor Mailing Address P.O. BOX 2200, RIVERSIDE. CALIFORNIA 92516 Location of Nearest Gas Main: Country Club Dr. at Palm Greens Pkwy. April 25, 1978 City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, California 92260 Re: Tent Tract 11791 This letter is not to be interpreted as a contractual commitment to serve the proposed project; but only as an information service. Its intent is to notify you that the Southern California Gas Company has facilities in the area where the above named project is proposed. Gas Service to the project could be provided from an existing main without any significant impact on the environment. The service would be in accordance with the Company's policies and extension rules on file with the California Public Utilities Cor,„mission at the time contractual arrangements are made. The availability of natural gas service, as set forth in this letter, is based upon present conditions of gas supply and regulatory policies. As a public. utility, the Southern California Gas Company is wider the jurisdiction of the California Public Utilities Commission. We can a1S0 he Rffertorl by Prt.iCPS of fnrieral rentil;otnry enemies. $'nn::ld these agencies tare any action which affects gas supply or the condition under which service is available, gas service will be provided in accordance with revised conditions. We have developed several programs which are available, upon request, to provide assistance in selecting the most effective aoplicatior.s of energy conservation techniques for a particular project. If you desire further information on any of our energy conservation programs , please contact this office for assistance. RWR:bIc i __ Aof ENVIRCNPdEW L :;:-;:'VICES CITY OF PALM CCSRT TO: Mr. Paul A. Williams, Director of Environmental Services City of Palm Desert FROM: Lloyd W. Rogers, R.S. , Supervising Sanitarian Riverside County Health Department — Desert District DATE: April 25, 1973 SUBJECT: TT 11791 Due to the `_act that domestic water and sanitary sewer is to be provided by Coachella Valley County "atar District. A on ENTRONMENTAL SERVICES CITY OF PALKI DESERT Minutes Palm Desert Planning Commission June 14, 1978 Page Five VII . PUBLIC HEARINGS (Cont . ) C. Case Nos . DP 03-78 and 80C (Cont . ) MIKE GALLAGHER, noted that he is only seeking - conceptual approval at this time and that he has shown the basic grading. Further , he noted that the commercial area would be at the same grade as Country Club. He noted his ob- jection to Special Condition No . 4 , stating that he would like the sign program left up to the discretion of the Design Review Board. Mr . Williams suggested a new Special Condition No . 4 to read : Signs as shown are not approved. A complete Sign Program shall be submitted to the Design Review Board as part of the preliminary plans . Commissioner Fleshman indicated that he would like the next set of drawings to be in a larger scale . Chairman Berkey asked if there was anyone wishing to speak in FAVOR or in OPPOSITION to the proposed project . Being none , he declared the Public Hearing closed and asked for the pleasure of the Commission . Commissioner Fleshman asked that the words "in concept only" be added at the end of the Resolution . Commissioner Snyder asked if Mr . Williams would be answering the City of Rancho Mirage ' s letter . Mr . Williams noted he would be . On a motion by Commissioner Fleshman , seconded by Commissioner Kryder, the Commission approved the Cases with the noted additions , � . by Planning Commission Resolution No . 369 ; carried unanimously ( 5-0) . D. Continued Case o . fTTn117791 MCBAIL COMPANY, Applicant Request for approval of a Tentative Tract Map to create 101 single-family residential lots and 3 lots to provide for a district commercial center , a common recreation area and open space from a 40 acre parcel located at the southeast corner of Country Club Drive and Monterey Avenue . Mr. Williams reviewed the Staff Report and showed the Commission renderings of the proposed units . He noted that the subdivision con- tains pedestrian access to the commercial development . Commissioner Snyder asked 'now many 2 story units there would be? Mr . Gallagher noted that there would be 45 and in answer to a question by Commissioner Kryder as to whether they would be spread out, he stated that they would be. Commissioner Kryder asked if the Design Review Board had had any comments on the pool and jacuzzi area. He noted that there would be children in the area and perhaps the applicant should consider an area for children in the major pool area or a wading pool in the recreation center area. Commissioner Kelly asked if there would be a fence. Mr. Williams noted that it is mandatory . Commissioner Fleshman and Commissioner Kelly noted their objec- tion to the 2 story units and asked if the applicant had anything to say on this issue . Chairman Berkey declared the Public Hearing open and asked if the applicant would like to speak at this time . Minutes Palm Desert Planning Commission June 14, 1978 Page Six VII . PUBLIC HEARINGS (Cont . ) D. Case No . TT 11791 (Cont . ) MIKE GALLAGHER, stated that 2 story units are very popular but there are alternatives available . He also noted that he agreed with the pool area idea. Commissioner Fleshman stated that there are very few 2- story homes in the community and he wondered if the applicant had considered the heat loss and the cooling efficiency in 2-story homes. Chairman Berkey noted that it is the desire of the community to have single-story homes rather than 2-story . Commissioner Fleshman asked about the type of roofing tile to be used. Mr. Gallagher noted it would be barrel tile . Commissioner Kryder asked about the widths of the proposed streets and if it would be sufficient . He also noted that a Special Condition should require that the traffic signal proposed be opera- tive prior to the completion of the project . Commissioner Kelly asked what the schedule was for the signal and if anyone else was contributing to its cost . Mr . Beebe stated that it is 5th on the list of signals proposed and that it would probably not be operative for 2 to 3 years , but perhaps left turn pockets would be helpful prior to the signal being put in . He also noted that there was no one else contributing at this time. Commissioner Kryder again noted his objection to approving the project without a condition mandating traffic control improvements being completed prior to ` the completion of the project . Mr. Beebe suggested a Special Con- (t dition No. 13 which would read : Subject to approval of the Director of Public Works, adequate traffic safety provisions shall be made and methods of improving traffic circulation in the vicinity shall be provided at the intersection of Monterey and Country Club. Commissioner Fleshman questioned the perimeter wall ' s design . Mr. Williams noted that it would be slumpstone with a meandering bikepath and 8 feet of landscaping. Commissioner Fleshman stated that the wall on ➢4onterey should be other than straight . Some dis- cussion followed with regard, to the s(rthern-and eastern wall and whether it should meander; what type of landscaping it would have and how much; why is there windbreak protection on the south. Chairman Berkey noted that the applicant does have flexibility , to place a fence on the south and east side rather than a wall . Mr . Williams noted that this was correct. Mr . Gallagher noted that he would like to have some flexibility. Mr. Beebe noted that the sidewalk must remain in the public right-of-way . Chairman Berkey asked if there was anyone wishing to speak in FAVOR or in OPPOSITION to the project . Being none, he declared the Public Hearing closed and asked for the pleasure of the Commission . Commissioner Fleshman stated that he still had questions regarding the fencing on the south and east sides . Mr . Williams noted that the Design Review Board will approve the blow sand pro- tection measures. Commissioner Fleshman suggested a change to Condition No. 5 adding "conforming to Exhibit A, sheet 4 of the sub- mitted plans" and replace "concrete" with "decorative" . On Condition No. 10, delete the last two lines . Minutes Palm Desert Planning Commission June 14, 1978 Page Seven VII . PUBLIC HEARINGS (Cont . ) D. Case No. TT 11791 (Cont . ) The Commission discussed the 2-story issue and their disagree- ment with the need for 2-story homes. Mr . Williams suggested a new i Condition No . 14 - Delete plan 2116 ; and an addition to Condition + No. 3(b) requiring a single-story limitation . On a motion by Commissioner Fleshman , seconded by Commissioner Kelly, the Commission approved Case No. TT 11791 with the noted additions and corrections to the conditions by Planning Commission Resolution No. 370; carried unanimously (5-0) . THERE WAS A BRIEF RECESS AT 3:05 P.M. THE MEETING WAS RECONVENEDED AT 3:10 P.M. E . CASE NO. GPA 01-78, CITY OF PALM DESERT, Applicant Consideration of a proposed Amendment to the Circulation Element of the General Plan of the City of Palm Desert which would reduce the status of a portion of Portola Avenue from Major Highway to Local Street . Commissioner Fleshman abstained from the discussion and left the room due to a possible conflict as he has in the past worked with Mr. Ballew. Mr . Williams reviewed the Staff Report and noted that the pro- posed concept would allow for the dividing up of Ironwood ( local) traffic from through traffic. The proposal would also discourage the use of Portola as a by-pass to Highway 74 . Chairman Berkey declared the Public Hearing open and asked if anyone wished to speak in FAVOR or in OPPOSITION to the proposal . JOHN BALLEW, addressed the Commission and noted that Mesa View would better serve the area and that Ironwood has been looking at the circulation system and Portola ' s role for some time . He noted that an indepth study was put into the location of the park and the proposed fire station in addition to circulation and traffic. He also noted that this alternative will better serve the City and that most of the area residents seem in agreement . SHIRLEY SPORK, 73010 Somera Drive , indicated her concern with the added traffic that would be dumped onto Alamo and that she would like the Planning Commission to con- sider improving Chia Drive as an additional access road to Portola. Mr. Williams noted that the proposed General Plan Amendment would have the potential of reducing the amount of traffic on Alamo and he also noted that Chia is proposed to be extended. ' LARRY SPICER, Silver Spur Assoc . , mentioned that the Silver Spur Ranchers Assoc. had indicated to him that they are in favor of the proposal . Chairman Berkey declared the Public Hearing closed and asked for the pleasure of the Commission. On a motion by Commissioner Kelly, seconded by Commissioner Kryder, the Commission approved the proposed Amendment to the Circula- tion Element of the General Plan by Planning Commission Resolution No . 371 ; carried (4-1 ) (AYES : Berkey, Kelly, Kryder, Snyder ; ABSTAIN : Fleshman) . MINUTES AM ENDFD 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE June 20, 1978 APPLICANT MCBAIL COMPANY 3732 Mt. Diablo Blvd. Ste. 390 Lafayette. CA 94549 CASE NO. : TT 11791 The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of ,tuna 14- 1978 CONTINUED TO DENIED XX APPROVED BY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 370 PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF FOR CONCURRENCE WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION. XX PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF ,1uly 13 1978 FOR PUBLIC HEARING, Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Environmental Services, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. PAUL A. WILLIAMS, SECRETARY I PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSSION cc: Applicant C.V,C.W.D. File .J 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 June 19, 1978 LEGAL NOTICE CITY OF PALM DESERT REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP TO CREATE 101 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS AND 3 LOTS TO PROVIDE FOR A DISTRICT COMMERCIAL CENTER, A COMMON RECREATION AREA AND OPEN SPACE FROM A 40 ACRE PARCEL LOCATED AT THE SOUTH- EAST CORNER OF COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE AND MONTEREY AVENUE. CASE NO. TT 11791 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held before the Palm Desert City Council to consider a request by -the MCBAIL COMPANY for approval of a Tentative Tract Map to create 101 single-family residential lots and 3 lots to provide for a District Commercial Center, a common recreation area and open space from a 40 acre parcel located within the P.C. (2) (Planned Commercial , District) and R-2 8,000 (Single-family residential , 8,000 sq. ft. of site area/du) zones, Upon Annexation, at the southeast corner of Country Club Drive and Monterey Avenue, more particularly described as: APN 621-190-045-8 APN 621-1.50-002-9 coayrOY CLUB OR/VE �{ _ TT 11791 W W Y II C"NC LANE F p CM .. I ... .. .- I .. 1 u ' 71 SAID Public Hearing will be held on Thursday, July 13, 1978, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers in the Palm Desert City Hall , 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place, all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. SHEILA R. GILLIGAN, City Clerk City of Palm Desert, California PUBLISH: Palm Desert Post June 22, 1978 �� ( � � � s CITY OF PALM DESERT STAFF REPORT To: Planning Commission Report On: Tentative Tract Map Applicant: MCBAIL COMPANY Case No. : TT 11791 Date: `June" 14, 1�8 I . REQUEST: Request for approval of a Tentative Tract Map to create 101 single-family residential lots and 3 lots to provide for a District Commercial Center, a:common recreation area and open space from a 40 acre parcel located within the P.C. (2) (Planned Commercial , District) and R-2 8,000(8) (Single- family residential , 8,000 sq. ft. min. lot area, 8,000 sq. ft. of site area/du) zones, Upon Annexation, at the southeast corner of Country Club Drive and Monterey Avenue. II . STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the Tentative Tract Map to the City Council by Plan- ning Commission Resolution No. 370. Justification: 1 . The subject Tentative Map does substantially comply with Chapter 26 of the City of Palm Desert Municipal Code, and the State of California Subdivision Map Act, as amended. 2. The subject Tentative Map does comply with the adopted General Plan and the Palm Desert Zoning Ordinance. 3. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed. 4. The site is physically. suited for the proposed density of the develop- ment. 5. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements_are not. ;li-kely to, cause substantial environmental damage or serious health-"pro- blems. III . BACKGROUND: A. Tract Size: Approximately 40 acres (28.5 acres for residential ) B. Proposed Lots: 1 - 101 Residential , Single-family detached 102-103 Common Recreational Area 104 Commercial C. Zoning for Subject Property: R-2 8,000(8)U.A. D. Adjacent Zoning: North - Riverside County Zoning South - PR-5, U.A. East - PR-5, U.A. West - Riverside County Zoning E. Proposed Density: Approximately 2.8 du/acre I Case No. TT 11791 May 17, 1978 Page Two III . BACKGROUND: (Cont. ) F. Environmental Finding: The Director of Environmental . Services has determined on April 24, 1978 that the project will not have a significant adverse effect on the environment. G. Utilities:: Power - - Southern California Edison Water - C.V.C.W.D. Sewer - C.V.C.W.D. Natural Gas c Southern California Gas Telephone - General Telephbne Co. IV. DISCUSSION: One of the principal concerns with. regard to this project, due to its location, is blowsand_and appropriate methods of controlling it. Special Condition No. l.r�quire's that blow-sand protection be provided on all sides of the project, yet the condition allows flexibility as to the means neces- sary to control the sand. Speciarl. Condition No. 5 requies a 6 foot block wall on the north side of Lots 13-20, Lot 102 and Lots 36-41 which represent the northern portion of the residential tract. Special Condition No. 11 involves both right-of-way required on Monterey Avenue and landscaping which will serve as a means of blowsand control on the western portion of the tract along Monterey. Traffic circulation will be no problem in the area. Ingress and egress shall be restricted onto Monterey Avenue except at 'A' Street. A $15,000 contri- bution toward the signalization of the intersection of Country Club Drive and Monterey is being .required. Dedication is being required along Monterey to provide for a 34 foot half width and a 16 foot parkway which shall include an 8' slightly meandering bike path. Special Condition No. 12 requires one minor change with regard to circulation, the cul -de-sac at the end of 'H' Street is to be shortened to provide a minimum of 35 feet of frontage for Lots 47-& 48. Public improvements required include sidewalks on Monterey and Country Club Drive; those adjacent to the commercial area to be 10 feet in width. Staff has received a letter from the City of Rancho Mirage regarding Case No. DP 03-78, the commercial portion of the project under discussion. Some of the comments, however, actually pertain to the tentative tract map pre- sently being discussed. The City of Rancho Mirage's first comment pertains to the proximity at which residential and commercial uses would be located in'-.this project and this is said not to be a good mix. Staff believes this comment is invalid:'as there will be .a 20 foot buffer with a block wall be- tween the residential .and commercial portions of the project. The Planning Commission has previously approved a project with mixed uses , the E1 Paseo Village project on the south side of E1 Paseo between Sun Lodge and Lupine and believed the two uses were compatible on a much smaller site than the present site. Projects done elsewhere, including one in Palm Springs, in- dicate that residential projects adjacent to well-designed commercial pro- jects can be highly successful . The City of Rancho Mirage also contends that many of the residential lots are irregular and too small in area. The Staff believes that the irregular shaped lots and flag lots create a much more interesting residential tract and pro- vide the developer with flexibility to provide interesting and diverse site plans and landscaping. With regard to density, at 3.5 du/acre the proposed project does not exceed Rancho Mirages's recommended 3:0 du/acre significantly. In addition, the developer is providing a large common recreation area which will adequately compensate for some of the area lacking in the individual lots. The City of Rancho Mirage also contends that Monterey and Country Club should have traffic signals. This concern is being addressed as previously indicated by Special Condition No. 8 Case No. TT 11791 June 14, 1978 Page Three IV. DISCUSSION (Cont. ) The present Tentative Tract. Map contains. revisions required by the Commission at the May 17th meeting. The "H" Street cul-de-sac has been shortened, the 4' x 20' landscape easements along Monterey Avenue deleted, and .a number of lot lines adjusted to create 8,0O0 square feet.minimum lots for all lots. More detailed calculations of lot areas will be made by the Department of Public Works at the final map review stage, but Special Condition No. 12 guarantees that the 8,000 square feet minimum will be adhered to.. The Revised Tentative Map submitted indicates that all .lots will be a minimum of 8,000 square feet. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 370 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, SETTING FORTH ITS FIND- INGS AND RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL, APPROVAL OF A TENTATIVE MAP TO CREATE 101 SINGLE-FAMILY RE- SIDENTIAL LOTS AND 3 LOTS TO PROVIDE FOR A DISTRICT COMMERCIAL CENTER, A COMMON RECREATION AREA AND OPEN SPACE FROM A 40 ACRE PARCEL LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE AND MONTEREY AVENUE . CASE NO. TT 11791 WHEREAS , the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert , California, did receive a verified application from the MCBAIL COMPANY, requesting approval of a Tentative Tract Map to create 101 single- family residential lots and 3 lots to provide for a District Commercial Center , a common recreation area and open space from a 40 acre parcel located within the P.C. (2) (Planned Commercial , District ) and R-2 8, 000 (Single-family residential , 8, 000 sq . ft . of site area/du) zones , Upon Annexation , at the southeast corner of Country Club Drive and Monterey Avenue, more particularly described as : APN 621-190-045-8 APN 621-150-002-9 WHEREAS , said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Environmental duality Procedure Resolution No. 78-32 in that the. Director of Environmental Services has developed an expanded initial study on the Prezoning Case No . C/Z O1-78 which includes the subject property and weighs the environmental impacts of said project , and this consideration has been determined to be an on-going project ; and, WHEREAS , the Planning Commission did take into consideration the Tentative Map as submitted, and the reports of the various reviewing agencies; and, WHEREAS , the Planning Commission did find that the subject Tenta- tive Map does substantially comply with Chapter 26 of the City of Palm Desert Municipal Code, and the State of California Subdivision Map Act , as amended; and, WHEREAS , the Planning Commission did find that the subject Tenta- tive Map does comply with the adopted General Plan and the Palm Desert Zoning Ordinance; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did find that the site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did find that the site is physically suited for the proposed density of the development ; and , WHEREAS , the Planning Commission did find that the design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements are not likely to cause sub- stantial environmental damage or serious health problems. NOW, THEREFORE , BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert , as follows : 1 . That the above recitations are true and correct and consti- tute the findings of the Commission in this case; 2 . That it does hereby recommend that the applicant pay a fee in an amount determined under the Ordinance provisions in order to com- ply with Article 26. 15 of the City ' s Subdivision Ordinance regarding the public facilities requirement ; PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 370 Page Two 3. That it does hereby recommend approval to the City Council of the City of Palm Desert of the above described Tentative Map No . 11791 , subject to fulfillment of the attached conditions. PASSED, APPROVED , and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission held on this 14th day of June , 1978 by the following vote, to wit : AYES : BERKEY, FLESHMAN, KELLY, KRYDER, SNYDER NOES : NONE ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE GEORGE BERKEY, Chairman ATTEST : PAUL A. WILLIAMS, Secretary /ks i. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 370 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO. TT 11791 Standard Conditions : 1 . The development of the property described herein shall be subject ' to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein which are in addition to all municipal ordinances and State and Federal statutes now in force, or which hereafter may be in force . 2 . Full public improvements including traffic safety lighting as required by Ordinance and the Director of Public Works , shall be installed in accordance with City standards . 3. The C.C. &R' s for this development shall be submitted to the Director of Public Works for review and approval prior to the issuance of any building permits . Prior to recordation of the final subdivision map , the applicant shall submit to the Director of Public Works : a. The document to convey title . b. Covenants and restrictions to be recorded including a single story limitation for buildings . C. Management and maintenance agreement to be entered into with the owners of the units of the project . 4. Improvement plans for water and sewer system shall meet the require- ments of the respective service districts . 5. Area shall be annexed to appropriate Improvement Districts having jurisdiction over the subject area. 6. All dedicated land and/or easements required by this approval shall be granted to the City of Palm Desert , without cost to the City and free of all liens and encumbrances. 7. All on-site utilities , including cable TV, shall be placed under- ground and shall be completely concealed from view except certain appurtenances as may be approved by the Director of Environmental Services. 8. Complete plans and specifications shall be submitted as required by Ordinance to the Director of Public Works for checking and approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. The sub- divider shall submit "as-built" plans prior to acceptance of the subdivision improvements by the City. 9. In order to maintain reasonable fire protection during the construc- tion period, the subdivider shall maintain passable vehicular access to all buildings . An adequate number of fire hydrants with the re- quired fire flows shall be installed as recommended by the Fire Mar- shal . 10. All requirements of the City Fire Marshal shall be met as a part of the development of this tract per attached memorandum. 11 . Drainage shall be subject to approval of the Director of Public Works . Applicant shall provide engineered data as requested. I} 12. All requirements of the Planning Commission action on related Case No. DP 03-78 shall be met as a part of the development of this tract . 13 . The total number of lots shall be limited to 104 . 14. The applicant shall have twelve (12) months from the date of the approval or conditional approval of the tentative map for filing of the final map unless an extension of time of up to eighteen ( 18) months is granted by a Resolution of the City Council . PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 370 15 . The applicant shall pay fees pursuant to Article 26 . 25 of the City ' s Subdivision Ordinance regarding the public facilities requirement . Special Conditions : 1 . Blow-sand protection shall be provided on a17 sides of the project. 2 . The necessary right-of-way dedication shall be deeded at recordation . 3. All improvements shall be constructed in accordance with the Palm Desert Subdivision Standards . 4. Sidewalks shall be provided on Monterey and Country Club Drive . Sidewalks adjacent to the commercial area shall be 10 foot in width. 5. A decorative block wall, 6 feet in height, as shown on Sheet 4 of the plans, shall be required adjacent to Lots 13 to 20, Lot 102, and Lots 36 to 41. r 6. No ingress or egress to any of the lots shall be provided from Monterey Avenue excepting at "A" Street . 7. Traffic safety lighting shall be provided at "A" Street at both ends thereof. 8 . Applicant shall make a $15, 000 contribution towards the signalization of the intersection at Country Club Drive and Monterey. 9. All drainage shall be engineered and approved by the Director of Public Works . 10. Applicant shall dedicate sufficient land along Monterey Avenue to provide for a 34 foot half width and a 16 foot parkway which shall include an 8' slightly meandering bike path and intensive landscap- ing. 11. Cul-de-sac at the end of "H" Street shall be shortened to provide at least 35 feet of frontage for Lots 47 & 48. Lots 46 - 50 shall be adjusted to incorporate the additional land area so that none ` of the lots shall be less than 8 , 000 sq. ft . lL 12. All residential lots shall be a minimum of 8 , 000 sq. ft . and all development shall conform to all requirements of said Zone District . 13. Subject to approval of the Director of Public Works, adequate traffic safety provisions shall be made and methods of improving traffic cir— culation in the vicinity shall be provided at the intersection of Monterey and Country Club. 14. Plan 2116 shall be deleted. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 370 April 25, 1978 Paul A. Williams Director of Environmental Services City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, Ca. 92260' Reference: Tentative Tract No. 11791 (Residential area only) Provide the following fire protection: 1 . Install a water system capable of delivering 1500 GPM fire flow from any fire hydrant for a two hour duration in addition to domestic supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement. 2. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants located at each street intersection (a) but not greater than 500 feet apart in any direction. A. Exterior surface of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow, and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. B. Curbs shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. 3. .prior to recordation of the final map, the developer shall furnish the original and three (3) copies of the water system plan to the Fire Marshal for review. 4. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and approved by the water company, with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system in Tract No. 11791 is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Fire Marshal . " Upon approval , the original plan will -be returned to the developer. Very truly yours, David L. Flake Fire Chief ( David J. Orteoel I4 Ceputy 'Fire Marshal l._ City of RANCHO -MIRAGE ,AGE Yt,ntlev A� -�' 69825 HIGHWAY III RANCHOMIRAGE CALIFORNIA 92270 TELEPHONE (714)328.U71 April 21 , 1978 Mayor Ed Mullins City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 Re: Case No. DP 03-78 Project: District Commercial Center Applicant: McBail Company Dear Ed: The City Council at their meeting of April 20 reviewed the District Commercial Center project proposed for Country Club and Monterey Road. Due to the material not arriving in time to be presented to our Planning Commission, the City Council asked if this could be held over at least two weeks so that they could have a chance to review it. At that time the Planning Commission wi`11 be in a position to respond to the inquiry . from Paul Williams. Awaiting your reply, I will schedule this for discussion by the Planning Commission and City Council . Sinnccereelyy yours, &* "24 William J. Probert City Manager WJP:bd ' City of RANCHO MIRAGE 69 825 HIGHWAY III RANCHO MIRAGE CALI FOR N IA 92270 TELEPHONE (71a)128 8871 May 4, 1978 Mr. Paul A. Williams, Director Environmental Services City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, CA 92260 Re: Case No. DP-03-78, application by Mjc8ail Company Dear Mr. Williams: This is to report to you that on April 26, 1978, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Mirage discussed Case DP-03-78 as transmitted by your office. The location of the project is on the southeast corner of Country Club and Monterey and consists of 40 acres to be used for a commercial develop- ment and single family development. I am aware that your request was to have the information returned to your office by April 25, 1978, but because the Planning Commission did not meet until April 26, 1978, their recommendation is being sent to you at this time. Attached you will find a letter dated April 21 , 1978 from Mr. William Probert, City Manager, addressed to Mayor Ed Mullins , asking for an extension of time to allow the Planning Commission an opportunity to comment. The City Planning Commission recommends denial of Case DP-03-78 subject to the following reasons as outlined in staff report dated April 20, 1978. 1 . The commercial activity being proposed so close to the proposed use by single family residences is not a good mix. 2. The plan shows Monterey Avenue as having a 50' dedication for a half width street. The City's General Plan indicates Monterey as a 55' half width street with an ultimate full width dedication of 110' . 3. The lot size as provided in the residential area is a minimum 8,000 sq.ft. and the Commission feels this minimum is too small and should at least be compatible with the City' s minimum of. 10,000 sq. ft. Many of the lots within the residential development are irregular in shape and have street frontages as small as 20' . This does not meet the City's minimum design standards and the Commission feels this small frontage causes problems in the future and is not good design. The density of the residential project is 3.5 units per acre, exceeding the density of 3 units per acre per City of Rancho Mirage requirements. It is not a desirable density. 4. Monterey and Country Club should have signals at this location. ♦� q Page 2 Re: Case No. DP-03-78 Please see attached excerpt from Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of April 26, 1978. Thank you for the opportunity of allowing the City of Rancho Mirage to review and comment on the proposed development. PATRICK M. PRATT Administrative Assistant PMP:grb Attachments rc_ s.. Regular Planning Commission Meeting April 26, 1978 Mr. Pratt presented the referral from the City of Palm Desert regarding PALM DESE Case No. DP 03-78, District Commercial Center, to be located at the south- REFERRAL east corner of Country Club Drive and Monterey. Staff feels the commer- DISTRICT cial activity proposed is too close to proposed single family residences. COMMERCIA! They also propose 8,000 sq.ft. lots, which are too small . The density of CENTER the project would be 3.5 units per acre, which is greater than that allowed by Rancho Mirage. Also, with the way the lots are laid out, many are flag lots and would only have about 20 ft. frontage on the street, which is bad. Staff recommends transmitting City's recommendation of denial on the project. It o-ras moved by Commissioner McFadden, seconded b Commissioner Murray, MOTION that a letter be sent to the City of Palm Desert stating the Planning Commission recommends denial of the proposed District Commercial Center for the reasons outlined in the report by staff. Hearing no objections, it was so ordered. INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM City of Palm Desert TO: Planning Commission FROM: Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Tentative Tract No. 11791 DATE: April 19th; 1978 1. Sand blow protection shall be provided for this tract on three sides, excluding Country Club Drive. 2. The necessary right of way dedication shall be deeded at recordation. 3. All improvements shall be constructed in accordance with the Palm Desert Subdivision Standards, 4. Sidewalks shall be provided on Monterey and Country Club Drive. Note the sidewalks adjacent to. the commercial area 'shall " be 10 foot in width. 5. A concrete block wall , 6 feet in height shall be- required adjacent to Lots 13 to 20, Lot 102, and hots 36 to 41. 6. No ingress or egress to any of the lots shall be provided from Monterey Avenue excepting at a street, . 7. Traffic safety lighting shall be provided at "A" street at both ends thereof. 8. This tract shall make a contribution towards a signalization intersection at Country Club Drive and Monterey, to the extent of $5,000,00. 9, . All drainage shall be engineered and approved by the Director of Public Works. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA g COMPANY 3700 CENTRAL AVENUE • RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA R.W.RIDDELL Eastern Division Distribution Planning Supervisor Mailing Address P.O. BOX 2200, RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92516 Location of Nearest Gas Main: Country Club Dr. at Palm Greens Pkwy. April 25, 1978 City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, California 92260 Re: Tent Tract 11791 This letter is not to be interpreted as a contractual commitment to serve the proposed project; but only as an information service. Its intent is to notify you that the Southern California Gas Company has facilities in the area where the above named project is proposed. Gas service to the project could be provided from an existing main without any significant impact on the environment. The service would be in accordance with the Company's policies and extension rules on file with the California Public Utilities Commission at the time contractual arrangements are made. The availability of natural gas service, as set forth in this letter, is based upon present conditions of gas supply and regulatory policies. As a public utility, the Southern California Gas Company is under the jurisdiction of the California Public Utilities Commission. We can also be affected by actions of federal regulatory agencies: Shnuld these agencies take any action which affects gas supply or the condition under which service is available, gas service will be provided in accordance with revised conditions. We have developed several programs which are available, upon request, to provide assistance in selecting the most effective applications of energy conservation techniques for a particular project. If you desire further information on any of our energy conservation programs , please contact this office for assistance. RWR:blc F, V E D AP i. ENVIRONMENTAL S11:hV10ES CITY. OF PALM DESERT TO: Mr. Paul A. Williams, Director of Environmental Services City of Palm Desert FROM: Lloyd W. Rogers, R.S. , Supervising Sanitarian Riverside County Health Department — Desert District DATE: April 25, 1978 SUBJECT. TT 11791 Due to the fact that domestic water and)sanitary sewer is to be provided by Coachella Valley County Water District. Cr i i I i i i I i 1 4 i RECEIVE ® APR 26 '3i; ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CITY OF PALM DESERT 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE May 18, 1978 APPLICANT MCBAIL COMPANY Michael R. Gallagher 3732 Mt. Daiblo Blvd. Ste. 390 Lafayette, CA 94549 CASE NO. : DP 03-78, 80C & TT 11791 The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of May 17, 1978 . XX CONTINUED TO June 14, 1978 DENIED APPROVED BY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PLACED ON THE AGE14DA OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF FOR CONCURRENCE WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION. PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF FOR PUBLIC HEARING. Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Environmental Services, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. PAUL A. WILLIAMS, SECRETARY PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSSION cc: Applicant C.V.C.W.D. File I-OrSlZ.g u�, fi�26AGE 01 1200o I .27 2 000 - 11700 I . 03 gt�oo I , 22 q - 4(abD ck q aloo (p I , zS qp�p , 20 87ZS 2 4b s sso , 75 84-00 34- 82so 2 , 37 - 800O 41 7. ,rZ 7800 I . 17 7700 4 . 70 715-0D 2 , 3�I 7 12s 2 . 3Z 700O 13 72c�o S Ml F ff �oul+ry ESTABLISHED IN 1918 AS A PUBLIC AtaeNCY CIS TRIGS COACHELLA VALLEY COUNTY WATER DISTRICT POST OFFICE BOX 1058 COACHELLA, CALIFORNIA 92236 • TELEPHONE (714) 398-2651 DIRECTORS OFFICERS RAYMOND R. RUMMONDS, PRESDENT LOWELL O. WEEKS, GENERAL MANAGER-CHIEF ENGINEER TELLIS CODEKAS, VICE PRESIDENT 17 May 1978 OLE J. NORDLAND, SECRETARY C. J. FROST WALTER R. WRIGHT,AUDITOR WILLIAM 8. GARDNER REDWINE AND SHERRILL, ATTORNEYS STEVE D.BUXTON File: 0163.11 0421.1 0721.1 Department of Environmental Services City of Palm Desert Post Office Box 1977 Palm Desert, California 92260 Re: Tract 11791 Sec. 8, 15S, R6E Gentlemen: This area is protected from stormwater flows by the Whitewater River Stormwater Channel and may be considered safe from stormwater flows except in rare instances,, The District will furnish domestic water and sanitation service to said area in accordance with the currently prevailing regulations of this District. Very truly yours, Lowe _ O. Weeks General Manager-Chief E gineer KH:db cc: Riverside County Department of Public Health 46-209 Oasis Street Indio, California 92201 JR MAY 18 137 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CITY OF PALM DESERT PROOF OF PUBLICATION This space is for the County Clerk's Filing Stamp (2015.5 C.C.P.) STATE OF CALIFORNIAJ ss. County of Riverside I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above Proof of Publication of entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of PALM DESERT POST, a newspaper of general circu- lation, published weekly, in Palm Desert, County of CITY OF PALr1 DESERT Riverside, and which newspaper has been adjudged CASE NO. TT 11791 a newspaper of general circulation by thL:- - ,, .-• 5 ",� -- rr1 Court of the County of Riverside, State of I Ot'r gggg" Jr, Ica ; > aantG �+om a under date of October 5, 1964, Case Num • 8p_ that the notice, of which the annexed is a pri P°oEo V�•' �,►, i d- LL has been published in each regular and enti n cm ° said newspaper and not in any supplement E° f7t - cIz q the following dates to-wit: �g Wo=�ao�P - - -,.. - _• CZ°U°OLE Oa.Tf • //�%%%%////sJ�JJy'!.m i_N °E OE a __ April 27-'---197EL SdoWafO a 'anv t�ol� as «sod " aft° coo€� II J certify (or declare) under penalty or perju aoWia> 8 m foregoing is true and correct. Qwp oJ h Q J O.- WWUZOV 2 Ev_ gnature WF MQLUMZ ^a 3 N9Ab A9d31NON tt wW �- oFaa0zu0 �€ t agdg jJLLLLWo<,W Z - N pOaJO`2oWJOw. R •�— L.UPI Date Apxi1 27v 1�78- — — — uWa�>o<WWW- It- J x at Palm Desert, California 'YXoLL<o aim t o`ao Zia. <-OM Qa a F,- U II WOWW=W W 0 W"OJWWo u ' LL4AE ooz: a"Z _ �t ` Og^t W z i W �. .-i �n..0 q H • i PROOF. OF,%tJBLICATION This space is for the County Clerk's Filing Stamp (AG 5.5 C.C.P.) l' STATE OF CALIFORNIAl ss. County of Riverside I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above Proof of Publication of entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of PALM DESERT POST, a newspaper of general circu- lation, published weekly, in Palm Desert, County of .-City__of _Palm_ Desert Riverside, and which newspaper has been adjudged a newspaper of general circulation by the Superior Case No. TT 11791 Court of the County of Riverside, State of California, under date of October 5, 1964, Case Number 83658; that the notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy, ---- has been published in each regular and entire issue of -------------------------------------- said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on Paste clipping the following dates to-wit: of Notice SECURELY In This Space 6,/_22---------------------------------------- I certify (or declare) under penalty or perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. ------------------------------- Signature Date---------J-une---2-2------------- --------—--------- 197-8 at Palm Desert, California LEGAL -ICE held before the Palm Desert City Council to consider a request CITY OF GI DESERT by the MCBAIL COM—ANY for approval of a Tentative Tr'Sct REQUEST FOR APPROVAL C TENTATIVE TRACT MAP Map to create 101 • family residential lots and 3 lots to TO CREATE 107 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS provide for a Distric lmercial Center,a common recr€dffon AND 3 LOTS TO PROVIDE FOR A DISTRICT COMMERCIAL area and open space ,gym a 40 acre parcel located within;Mle CENTER, A COMMON RECREATION AREA AND OPEN P.C.(2) (Planned Commercial. District) and R-2 8,000 (Single- SPACE FROM A 40 ACRE PARCEL LOCATED AT THE family residential, 8.000 sq. f1. of site ores/du) zoneS,'Upon SOUTHEAST CORNER OF COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE AND Annexation, at the southeast-corner of Country Club Drive^ d MONTEREY AVENUE. + Monterey Avenue, more ptlfllcUlaA�y described as: CASE NO. TT 11791 APN 621-190r045-8 - �•:`�' NOTICE 15 HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be APN 621-150-002-9 i•e u i COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE vM TT 11791 W tl F.r N mow. CAAMCY LAM. nfp t k / qr;y "71 SAID Public Hearing will be held on Thursday,JuIY 13, 1918.at hecE ]:00 p.M. in the Council Chambers in the Palm Desert City Hall, SHEILA R. GILLIGA N, City Clerk a45-275 Prickear Lane, Palm nd Place, Il interested persons are are invited t0 attend antl be City of Palm Desert, California PDPL/22tl { ✓ -1 CITY OF PALM DESERT STAFF REPORT To: Planning Commission Report On: Tentative Tract Map Applicant: MCBAIL COMPANY Case No. : TT 11791 Date: June 14, 1978 i I. REQUEST: � I Request for approval of a Tentative Tract Map to create 101 single-family residential lots and 3 lots to provide for a District Commercial Center, a common recreation area and open space from a 40 acre parcel located within the P.C. (2) (Planned Commercial , District) and R-2 8,000(8) (Single- family residential , 8,000 sq. ft. min. lot area, 8,000 sq. ft. of site area/du) zones, Upon Annexation, at the southeast corner of Country Club Drive and Monterey Avenue. II . STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the Tentative Tract Map ,to the City Council by Plan- ning Commission Resolution No. _ Justification: 1 . The subject Tentative Map does substantially comply with Chapter 26 of the City of Palm Desert Municipal Code, an'd the State of California Subdivision Map Act, as amended. 2. The subject Tentative Map does comply with the adopted General Plan and the Palm Desert Zoning Ordinance. 3. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed. 4. The site is physically suited for the proposed density of the develop- ment. 5. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or serious health pro- blems. III. BACKGROUND: A. Tract Size: , Approximately 40 acres (28.5i acres for residential ) B. Proposed Lots: 1 - 101 Residential , Single-family detached 102-103 Common Recreational Area 104 Commercial C. Zoning for Subject Property: R-2 8,OOO(8)U.A. D. Adjacent Zoning: North - Riverside County Zoning South - PR-5, U.A. East - PR-5, U.A. West - Riverside County Zoning E. Proposed Density: Approximately 2.8 du/acre Case No. TT 11791 May 17, 1978 Page Two III. BACKGROUND: (Cont. ) F. Environmental Finding: The Director of Environmental Services has -determined on April 24, 1978 that the project will not have a significant adverse effect on the environment. G. Utilities: Power - Southern California Edison Water - C.V.C.W.D. Sewer - C.V.C.W.D. Natural Gas - Southern California Gas Telephone - General Telephone Co. IV. DISCUSSION:. One of the principal concerns with regard to this project, due to its location, is blowsand and appropriate methods of controlling it. Special Condition No. 1 requiresthat blow-sand protection be provided on all sides of the project, yet the condition allows flexibility as to the means neces- sary to control the sand. Special Condition No. 5 requies a 6 foot block wall on the north side of Lots 13-20, Lot 102 and Lots 36-41 which represent the northern portion of the residential tract. Special Condition No. 11 involves both right-of-way required on Monterey Avenue and landscaping which will serve as a means of blowsand control on the western portion of the tract along Monterey. Traffic circulation will be no problem in the area. Ingress and egress shall be restricted onto Monterey Avenue except at 'A' Street. A $15,000 contri- bution toward the signalization of the intersection of Country Club Drive and Monterey is being required. Dedication is being required along Monterey to provide for a 34 foot half width and a 16 foot parkway which shall include an 8' slightly meandering bike path. Special Condition No. 12 requires one minor change with regard to circulation, the cul -de-sac at the end of 'H' Street is to be shortened to provide a minimum of 35 feet of frontage for Lots 47 & 48. Public improvements required include sidewalks on Monterey and Country Club Drive; those adjacent to the commercial area to be 10 feet in width. Staff has received a letter from the City of Rancho Mirage regarding Case No. DP 03-78, the commercial portion of the project under discussion. Some of the comments, however, actually pertain to the tentative tract map pre- sently being discussed. The City of Rancho Mirage 's first comment pertains to the proximity at which residential and commercial uses would be located in this project and this is said not to be a good mix. Staff believes this comment is invalid as there will be a 20 foot buffer with a block wall be- tween the residential and commercial portions of the project. The Planning Commission has previously approved a project with mixed uses , the El Paseo Village project on the south side of El Paseo between Sun Lodge and Lupine and believed the two uses were compatible on a much smaller site than the present site. Projects done elsewhere, including one in Palm Springs, in- dicate that residential projects adjacent to well-designed commercial pro- jects can. be highly successful . The City of Rancho Mirage also contends that many of the residential lots are irregular and too small in area. The Staff believes that the irregular shaped lots and flag lots create a much more interesting residential tract and pro- vide the developer with flexibility to provide interesting and diverse site plans and landscaping. With regard to density, at 3.5 du/acre the proposed project does not exceed Rancho Mirages 's recommended 3.0 du/acre significantly. In addition, the developer is providing a large common recreation area which will adequately compensate for some of the area lacking in the individual lots. The City of Rancho Mirage also contends that Monterey and Country Club should have traffic signals. This concern is being addressed as previously indicated by Special Condition No. 8 Case No. TT 11791 June 14, 1978 Page Three IV. DISCUSSION (Cont. ) The present Tentative Tract Map contains revisions required by the Commission at the May 17th meeting. The "H" Street cul -de-sac has been shortened, the 4' x 20' landscape easements along Monterey Avenue deleted, and a number of lot lines adjusted to create 8,000 square feet minimum lots for all lots. More detailed calculations of lot areas will be made by the Department of Public Works at the final map review stage, but Special Condition No. 12 guarantees that the 8,000 square feet minimum will be adhered to. The Revised Tentative Map submitted indicates that all lots will be a minimum of 8,000 square feet. j 1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, SETTING FORTH ITS FIND- INGS AND RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL, APPROVAL OF A TENTATIVE MAP TO CREATE 101 SINGLE-FAMILY RE- SIDENTIAL LOTS AND 3 LOTS TO PROVIDE FOR A DISTRICT COMMERCIAL CENTER, A COMMON RECREATION AREA AND OPEN SPACE FROM A 40 ACRE PARCEL LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE AND MONTEREY AVENUE . ( CASE NO. TT 11791 Il WHEREAS , the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert , California, did receive a verified application from the MCBAIL COMPANY, requesting approval of a Tentative Tract Map to create 101 single- family, residential lots and 3 lots to provide for a District Commercial Center , a common recreation area and open space from a 40 acre parcel located within the P.C. (2) (Planned Commercial , District ) and R-2 8 , 000 (Single-family residential , 8, 000 sq. ft . of site area/du) zones , Upon Annexation , at the southeast corner of Country Club Drive and Monterey Avenue, more particularly described as : APN 621-190-045-8 APN 621-150-002-9 WHEREAS , said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Environmental duality Procedure Resolution No . 78-32 in that the Director of Environmental Services has developed an expanded initial study on the Prezoning Case No . C/Z 01-78 which includes the subject property and weighs the environmental impacts of said project, and this consideration has been determined to be an on-going project ; and, WHEREAS , the Planning Commission did take into consideration the Tentative Map as submitted, and the reports of the various reviewing agencies; and, - WHEREAS , , the Planning Commission did find that the subject Tenta- tive Map does substantially comply with Chapter 26 of the City of Palm Desert Municipal Code, and the State of California Subdivision Map Act , as amended; and, WHEREAS , the Planning Commission did find that the subject Tenta- tive Map does comply with the adopted General Plan and the Palm Desert Zoning Ordinance; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did find that the site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did find that the site is physically suited for the proposed density of the development ; and, WHEREAS , the Planning Commission did find that the design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements are not likely to cause sub- stantial environmental damage or serious health problems. NOW, THEREFORE , BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert , as follows : 1 . That the above recitations are true and correct and consti- tute the findings of the Commission in this case; 2 . That it does hereby recommend that the applicant pay a fee in an amount determined under the Ordinance provisions in order to com- ply with Article 26. 15 of the City ' s Subdivision Ordinance regarding the public facilities requirement ; PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. _ Page Two 3. That it does hereby recommend approval to the City Council of the City of Palm Desert of the above described Tentative Map No . 11791 , subject to fulfillment of the attached conditions . PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission held on this 14th day of June , 1978 by the following vote , to wit : AYES: NOES : I ABSENT: ABSTAIN: GEORGE BERKEY, Chairman ATTEST : PAUL A. WILLIAMS, Secretary Mks PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO. TT 11791 Standard Conditions : 1 . The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein which are in I addition to all municipal ordinances and State and Federal statutes now in force, or which hereafter may be in force . 2 . Full public improvements including traffic safety lighting as required by Ordinance and the Director of Public Works , shall be installed in accordance with City standards . 3. The C.C. &R' s for this development shall be submitted to the Director of Public Works for review and approval prior to the issuance of any building permits . Prior to recordation of the final subdivision map , the applicant shall submit to the Director of Public Works : a. The document to convey title . b. Covenants and restrictions to be recorded � w - 4,p� c. Management and maintenance agreement to be entered into with the owners of the units of the project . 4. Improvement plans for water and sewer system shall meet the require- ments of the respective service districts. 5. Area shall be annexed to appropriate Improvement Districts having jurisdiction over the subject area. 6. All dedicated land and/or easements required by this approval shall be granted to the City of Palm Desert ,. without cost to the City and free of all liens and encumbrances. 7 . All on-site utilities, including cable TV, shall be placed under- ground and shall be completely concealed from view except certain appurtenances as may be approved by the Director of Environmental Services . 8. Complete plans and specifications shall be submitted as required by Ordinance to the Director of Public Works for checking and approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. The sub- divider shall submit "as-built" plans prior to acceptance of the subdivision improvements by the City. 9. In order to maintain reasonable fire protection during the construc- tion period , the subdivider shall maintain passable vehicular access to all buildings. An adequate number of fire hydrants with the re- quired fire flows shall be installed as recommended by the Fire Mar- shal . 10. All requirements of the City Fire Marshal shall be met as a part of the development of this tract per attached memorandum. 11 . Drainage shall be subject to approval of the Director of Public Works . Applicant shall provide engineered data as requested. Ir 12. All requirements of the Planning Commission action on related Case No. DP 03-78 shall be met as a part of the development of this tract . 13 . The total number of lots shall be limited to 104'. 14 . The applicant shall have twelve ( 12) months from the date of the approval or conditional approval of the tentative map for filing of the final map unless an extension of time of up to eighteen ( 18) months is granted by a Resolution of the City Council . r PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15. The applicant shall pay fees pursuant to Article 26 . 25 of the City ' s Subdivision Ordinance regarding the public facilities requirement . Special Conditions : 1 . Blow-sand protection shall be provided on all sides of the project . 2. The necessary right-of-way dedication shall be deeded at recordation . 3. All improvements shall be constructed in accordance with the Palm Desert Subdivision Standards. 4. Sidewalks shall be. provided on Monterey and Country Club Drive . Sidewalks adjacent to the commercial area shall b5aequiAre0A'd1jac6nt width . xvw ' Oo �K�� 15. A � b�k wall , 6 feet in heights a 1e to Lots 13 to 20, Lot 102 , and Lots 36 to 41 . 6. No ingress or egress to any of the lots shall be provided from ` Monterey Avenue excepting at "A" Street . (l 7. Traffic safety lighting shall be provided at "A" Street at both ends thereof . 8. Applicant shall make a $15, 000 contribution towards the signalization of the intersection at Country Club Drive and Monterey . 9. All drainage shall be engineered and approved by the Director of Public Works. 10. Applicant shall dedicate sufficient land along Monterey Avenue to provide for a 34 foot half width and a 16 foot parkway which shall include an 8 ' slightly meandering bike path and intensive landscap- ing. This landscaping shall be used as a means of blowsand control ,m " • 11. Cul-de-sac at the end of "H" Street shall be shortened to provide at least 35 feet of frontage for Lots 47 & 48. Lots 46 - 50 shall be adjusted to incorporate the additional land area so that none of the lots shall be less than 8, 000 sq. ft . (L 12. All residential lots shall be a minimum of 8 , 000 sq. ft . and all development shall conform to all requirements of said Zone District . PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. _ April 25, 1978 t Paul A. Williams Director of Environmental Services City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 Reference: Tentative Tract No. 11791 (Residential area only) Provide the following fire protection: 1 . Install a water system capable of delivering 1500 GPM fire flow from any fire hydrant for a two hour duration in addition to domestic supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement. 2. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants located at each street intersection (a) but not greater than 500 feet apart in any direction. _ A. Exterior surface of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. chrome yellow, B. Curbs shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. 3. Prior to recordation of the final map, the developer shall furnish the original and three (3) copies of the water system plan to the Fire Marshal for review. 4. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and approved by the water company, with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system in Tract No. 11791 is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Fire Marshal . " Upon approval , the original plan will be returned to the developer. Very truly yours, David L. Flake Fire Chief ( David J. Orteael lJ Ceputy Fire Marshal City of RANCHO MIRAGE 69-825 HIGHWAY 111 RANCHO MIRAGE CALIFORNIA 92270 TELEPHONE (714)328 3871 May 4, 1978 Mr. Paul A. Williams, Director Environmental Services City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, CA 92260 Re: Case No. DP-03-78, application by Mc6ail Company Dear Mr. Williams: This is to report to you that on April 26, 1978, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Mirage discussed Case DP-03-78 as transmitted by your office. The location of the project is on the southeast corner of Country Club and Monterey and consists of 40 acres to be used for a commercial develop- ment and single family development. I am aware that your request was to have the information returned to your office by April 25, 1978, but because the Planning Commission did not meet until April 26, 1978, their recommendation is being sent to you at this time. Attached you will find a letter dated April 21 , 1978 from Mr. William Probert, City Manager, addressed to Mayor Ed Mullins , asking for an extension of time to allow the Planning Commission an opportunity to comment. The City Planning Commission recommends denial of Case DP-03-78 subject to the following reasons as outlined in staff report dated April 20, 1978. 1 . The commercial activity being proposed so close to the proposed use by single family residences is not a good mix. 2. The plan shows Monterey Avenue as having a 50 ' dedication for a half width street. The City's General Plan indicates Monterey as a 55 ' half width street with an ultimate full width dedication of 110' . 3. The lot size as provided in the residential area is a minimum 8,000 sq.ft. and the Commission feels this minimum is too small and should at least be compatible with the City's minimum of 10,000 sq. ft. Many of the lots within the residential development are irregular in shape and have street frontages as small as 20' . This does not meet the City's minimum design standards and the Commission feels this small frontage causes problems in the future and is not good design. The density of the residential project is 3.5 units per acre, exceeding the density of 3 units per acre per City of Rancho Mirage requirements. It is not a desirable density. 4. Monterey and Country Club should have signals at this location. Page 2 Re: Case No. DP-03-78 Please see attached excerpt from Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of April 26, 1978. Thank you for the opportunity of allowing the City of Rancho Mirage to review and comment on the proposed development. PATRICK M. PRATT Administrative Assistant Pi+P:grb Attachments Q °w SP m Cit RANCHO I � I O � Y of R \� MHO MIRAGE Yt ryh`d 69825 HIGHWAY Ill RANCHO MIRAGE CALIFORNIA 92270 TELEPHONE (714)328.8871 April 21 , 11978 Mayor Ed Mullins City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear lane Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 Re: Case No. DP 03-78 Project: District Commercial Center Applicant: McBail Company Dear Ed: The City Council at their meeting of April 20 reviewed the District Commercial Center project proposed for Country Club and Monterey. Road. Due to the material not arriving in time to be presented to our Planning Commission; the City Council asked if this could be held over at least two weeks so that they could have a chance to review it. At that time the Planning Commission wi`11 be in a position to respond to the inquiry from Paul Williams. Awaiting your reply, I will schedule this for discussion by the Planning Commission and City Council . Sincerely yours, William J. Probert City Manager WJP:bd Regular Planning Commission Fleeting April 26, 1978 Fir. Pratt presented the referral from the City of Palm Desert regarding P`L11 DESE Case No. DP 03-78, District Commercial Center, to be located at the south- REFERRAL I east corner of Country Club Drive and Monterey. Staff feels the commer- DISTRICT cial activity proposed is too close to proposed single family residences. COhI?IERCIAI They also propose 8,000 sq.ft. lots, which are too small . The density of CENTER the project would be 3.5 units per acre, which is greater than that allowed by Rancho Mirage. Also, with the way the lots are laid out, many are flag lots and would only have about 20 ft. frontage on the street, which is bad. Staff recommends transmitting City's recommendation of denial on the project. It was moved by Commissioner McFadden, seconded by Commissioner Murray, MOTION that a letter be sent to the City of Palm Desert stating the Planning Commission recommends denial of the proposed District Commercial Center for the reasons outlined in the report by staff. Hearing no objections, it was so ordered. INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM' City of Palm Desert TO: Planning Commission FROM: Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Tentative Tract No. 1179.1 DATE: April 19th, 1978 1. Sand blow protection shall be provided for this tract on three sides, excluding Country Club Drive. 2. The necessary right of way dedication shall be deeded at recordation. 3. All improvements shall be constructed in accordance with the Palm Desert Subdivision Standards, 4. Sidewalks shall be provided on Monterey and Country Club Drive. Note the sidewalks adjacent to the commercial area shall be 10 foot in width. 5. A concrete block wall , 6 feet in height shell be required adjacent to Lots 13 to 20, Lot 102, and hots 36 to 41.. 6. No ingress or egress to any of the lots shall be provided from Monterey Avenue excepting at a street,` 7. Traffic safety lighting shall be provided at "A street at both ends thereof. 8. This tract shall make a contribution towards a signalization intersection at Country Club Drive and -Monterey, to the extent of $5,000.00. 9. All drainage shall be engineered and approved by the Director of Public Works. SOUTHERN Cr^L;FOriNI Comas '! COMPANY ANY 3700 CENTRAL AVENUE • RIVERSIDE. CALIFORNIA R.W.RIDDELL Eastern Division Distribution Planning Supervisor Mailing Address P.O. BOX 2200, RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92516 Location of Nearest Gas Main: Country Club Dr. at Palm Greens PkwY. April 25, 1978 City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, California 92260 Re: Tent Tract 11791 This letter is not to be interpreted as a contractual commitment to serve the proposed project; but only as an information service. Its intent is to. notify you that the Southern California Gas Company has facilities in the area where the above named project is proposed. Gas service to the project could be provided from an existing main without any significant impact on the environment. The service would be in accordance with the Company's policies and extension rules on file with the California Public Utilities Commission at the time contractual arrangements are made. The availability of natural gas service, as set forth in this letter, is based upon present conditions of gas supply and regulatory policies. As a public utility, the Southern California Gas Company is under the jurisdiction of the California Public Utilities Commission. We can also be Affected hli actions of feriprdl reoulat;iry agencies, $hn:.;16 these agencies take any action which affects gas supply or the condition under which service is available, gas service will be provided in accordance with revised conditions. We have developed several programs which are available, upon request, to provide assistance in selecting the most effective applications of energy conservation techniques for a particular project. If you desire further information on any of our energy conservation programs , please contact this office for assistance. RWR:blc WI "' ENVIRONMENTAL :-.-:.VICES CITY OF PALM DESRT I TO: Mr. Paul A. Williams, Director of .Environmental Services City of Palm Desert FROM: Lloyd W. Rogers, R.S. , Supervising Sanitarian Riverside County Health Department - Desert District DATE: April 25, 1978 SUBJECT: TT 11791 Due to the fact that domestic water and sanitary sewer is to be provided by Coachella Valley County Water District. I i • I i I 1.3r , ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES -CITY OF PALM DESERT I I Minutes Palm Desert Planning Commission May 17 , 1978 Page Three VI . PUBLIC HEARINGS (Cont . ) A. Case No . C/Z O1-78 (Cont . ) GEORGE MARZICOLA, President of Country Club Property Owners Association , noted he is generally in agreement with the proposed zoning and annexation. He stated that the extension of streets and the improvements of others should be taken into consideration with a bridge considered on Cook Street . Further he noted that the Association is opposed to annexations because of the Excise Tax involved. RICHARD GUELICH, Santa Cruz, noted the extensive work that the Staff had put into the report on the pre- zoning and he noted his concern for the ability of the City to maintain the open space. Chairman Berkey stated that he felt the case should be continued for further review. Commissioner Kelly stated that more input is needed on the utilities in the area and the maintenance of the sand dunes . Commissioner Kryder indicated more information was needed on the traffic situation . Commissioner Snyder asked that Staff be able to answer the questions regarding maintenance of the open space and alternatives to an open space zoning designation . / On a motion by Commissioner Kryder, seconded by Commissioner Kelly, the Commission continued Case C/Z 01-78 to June 14, 1978 for further review and study; carried unanimously (4-0) . B. Case Nos . DP 03-78 and 80C - MCBAIL COMPANY, Applicant Il Mr . Williams noted that these cases and Case No . TT 11791 should be continued to June 14 , 1978 also due to the action of the Commission on the pre-zoning. MIKE GALLAGHER, representing the applicant , noted his agreement with the continuance, C. ase No . TT 1179 /continued as noted above . D. Case No. CUP 07-76 - HENRY TAGLE, Applicant Request for approval of an extension of time for an approved Conditional Use Permit to allow the construe- tion of a restaurant with Variances from parking re- quirements and setback requirements on property located at the northwest corner of Palm Desert Drive and San Carlos Avenue. Mr. Williams reviewed the case and noted that the Commission had approved a previous extension of one year. Chairman Berkey declared the Public Hearing open and asked the applicant if he wished to speak at this time: RICHARD HOLDEN, representing the applicant , stated he was available to answer any questions . Commis- sioner Snyder asked why the delay . Mr. Holden stated that there was a problem with funding due to the size of the interior of the restauant . Further, the only problem that now exists is the line-of-site problem but that should be resolved with the Redevelopment plans for that area of the City. 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 i May 2, 1978 Ms. Faye Raff 801 S. Lucerne Blvd. Apt. 208 Los Angeles, . CA 90005 Re: Case Nos. DP 03-78 & TT 11791 Dear Ms. Raff: As you have requested, we are enclosing a site plan for the development of single-family homes and a commercial corner. This is a preliminary plan only for approval by the City of Palm Desert. If further information is required, please con tact the Staff of the Dept. of Environmental Services. /Very-truly yours, Paul A. Williams, A. I.P. Director of Environmental Services lm/pw/ks Enc. i April 30, 1978 City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, Calif. 92260 ATTN: Mr. Paul Williams, Secretary, Palm Desert, Planning Commission REFERENCE: Case Nos. DP 03-78 & 80C and TT 11791 I am a property owner of parcel 621-190-047-0 which is contiguous to the acreage of the referenced Case Numbers. Request that you forward, as soon as possible but prior to the May 17, 1978 Public Hearing, a dimension plan that would identify the approximate size and locations of structures proposed under the above referenced Case Numbers, to cover the following; (1) The main commercial structure which will include both a super- market and ancillary shops. (2) The automobile service station. (3) The offices and restaurant. (4) Location, size and, type of signs to identify tenants and. types of businesses. (5) Location and height of walls separating commercial from resi- dential structures. (6) Set back dimensions of both commercial and residential structures from the property lines. Request that your reply be forwarded to the following address: 801 So. Lucerne Blvd. , Apt. 208 Los Angeles, Calif. 90005 Very truly yours, ' �'-the Fl (SNAPIRO) RAFF WriC F. IVEEUP MAY 21973 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CITY OF. PALM DESERT, F; RAFF .: 301 So. Lucerne Blvd. Los Angeles, Ca. 90005 ___-- - F A ' amp -• CITY OF PALM DESERT 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR ?ANE PALM DESERT, CA, 92260 ATTN: Mr. Paul Williams, Secretary Palm Desert Planning Commission i vil l- 1 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT,CAUFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 May 9, 1978 Mrs. Faye (Shapiro) Raff 801 S. Lucerne Blvd. Apt. 208 Los Angeles, CA 90005 Dear Mrs. Raff: This is to acknowledge receipt of your letter of April 29, 1978, requesting additional information regarding zoning designations for that land lying north of the existing Palm Desert City limits proposed to be annexed. Pursuant to your request, we are enclosing herewith a copy of Chapter 25.18 and 25.24 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code which describe the R-2 and PR districts respectively. It can be noted from a comparison of the two districts that they differ generally only in purpose. The R-2 district provides a conventional approach to land development, while the PR district provides greater flexi- bility with regard to standard zoning requirements. With respect to your query about the letters du, please be advised that they refer to dwelling unit. We trust the foregoing information will be helpful to you. Should you have any further questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact us. truly yours, Paul A. Williams, A.I.P. Director of Environmental Services rk/pw/ks Enc. _ Jam. April 29, 1978 City of palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, Calif. 92260 ATTN: Mr. Paul Williams, Secretary, Palm Desert Planning Commission Dear Mr. Williams: Your letter of April 24, 1978, advising that the City of Palm Desert has initiated proceedings to annex approximately 1,050 acres of land located generally adjacent to and north of the existing City limits at the request of property owners of the said territory has been received. I am a property owner of parcel 621-190-047-0 within the above area proposed for annexation. According to the legal notice dated April 24, 1978, forwarded with the above referenced letter, my parcel. is scheduled to be rezoned to PR-5 (Planned Redid.ential, max. 5 du/acre' upon annex- ation. The parcel of acreage contiguous and north of my parcel is sche- duled to be rezoned, R-2 (Single-family Residential, 8,000 sq. ft. min, lot area, min. 8,000 sq. ft./du) upon annexation. Please advise by return mail the difference between the PR-5 and R-2 zon- ing codes, and what the letters du represent. Also if a copy of the reg- ulation describing these zoning codes is available, please forward same. In paying my 1977-78 tax bill in full in December 1977, I incorporated my new mailing address. Subsequently on April 5, 1978, I informed the Assessorts Office by certified ,mail dated April 5, 1978, return receipt rquested, which was received on April 7, 1978, of my current mailing ad- dress. Apparently this address change still has not been taken care of as your April 24th letter was reforwarded, from my old, address. Request your records be corrected and that your response be sent to me at my current address which is as follows: 801 So. Lucerne Blvd. , Apt. 208 Los Angeles, Calif. 90005 Very truly yours, R CF0 ® EEW D FATE (SY.APIRO) RAFF ENC�TM SERVICES OF PALM DESERT S E UMBUS UNUM. F,, RAFF $Ol S0, LUCERNE ELVD, LOS ANGELES, CA, 90005 CITY OF PALM DESERT 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE PALM DESERT, CA, 92260 ATTN: Mr, Paul A. Williams, Secretary Palm Desert Planning Cormission 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Case No. : TT 11791 Project: Tentative Tract Map Applicant: MCBAIL COMPANY Enclosed please find materials describing a project for which the fallowing is being requested: Approval of a Tentative Tract Map to create 101 single-family residential lots and 3 lots to provide for a District Commercial Center, a common recreation area and open space from a 40 acre parcel located within the P.C. (2) (Planned Commercial , District) and R-2 8,000 (Single-family Residential , 8,000 sq. ft. of site area/du) zones, Upon Annexation, at the southeast corner of Country Club and Monterey Avenue. The attached data was prepared by the applicant and is being forwarded to you for comments and recommended Conditions of Approval . The City is interested in the probable impacts on the natural environment (e.g. water and air pollution) and on public resources (e.g. demand for schools, hospitals, parks, power generation, sewage treatment, etc. ) Your comments and recommended conditions of approval must be received by this office prior to 5:00 p.m. �pril 25th , 1978, in order to be discussed by the Land Division Commi Committee at their meeting of April 26th The Land Division Committee (comprised of Director of Environmental Services , City Building Official , City Engineer, Fire Marshal and a representative of CVCWD) will discuss the comments and recommended conditions of approval and will forward them to the Planning Commission through the staff report. Any information received by this office after the receipt deadline will not be discussed by the Land Division Com- mittee nor will it be forwarded to the Planning Commis ion for consid- eration. Very truly yours, 07zsertt W l6vs �U1�� 1. Paul A. Williams Director of Environmental Services "V1� i)�/'/ I APR 2 0 1978 -' Kw�' u6 COUNTY PAW/ks P COMMISSION PLEASE RETURN MAP WITH COM1 w� OFFICE 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 April 19, 1978 The enclosed material should be considered in your review of Case No. DP 03-78 which was inadvertantly omitted when mailed to you yesterday. Dept . of Environmental Services City of Palm Desert C.1 7E - APR 201978 ". RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION DESERT OFFICE ��s 45. OL PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT,CAUFORNIA92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 April 24, 1978 LEGAL NOTICE CITY OF PALM DESERT REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP TO CREATE 101 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS AND 3 LOTS TO PROVIDE FOR A DISTRICT COMMERCIAL CENTER, A COMMON RECREATION AREA AND OPEN SPACE FROM A 40jACRE PARCEL LOCATED AT THE SOUTH- EAST CORNER -OF COUNTRY 'CLUB DRIVE AND MONTEREY AVENUE. CASE NO. TT 11791 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by the MCBAIL COMPANY for approval of a Tentative Tract Map to create 101 single-family residential lots and 3 lots to provide for a District Commercial Center, a common re- creation area and open space from a,40 �acre parcel located within the P.C. (2) (Planned Commercial , District) and R=2 8,000 (Single-family residential , 8,000 sq. ft. of site area/du) zones, Upon Annexation, at the southeast corner of Country Club Drive and Monterey Avenue, more particularly described as: APN 621-190-045-8 APN 621-150-002-9 COUNTRY C411B OR/YE TT 11791 W U IV �— C"AICK LANQN. W SAID Public Hearing will be held on Wednesday, May 17, 1978, at 1 :00 p.m. in the Council Chambers in the Palm Desert City Hall , 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place, all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. PAUL A. WILLIAMS, Secretary Palm Desert Planning Commission PUBLISH: Palm Desert Post April 27, 1978 `t APR2/7t. —,! IJ.S.GCSIACf!� r .;. = zJ ^ 13 t 48-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92280,�� Q IF• e _ '. - Rye' '�'.�•_�.. ��'w TELEPHONE(714) D48-O811c-ptl• .�' `iV S >fWi� W r yo � C:) J .. ! Cv ` f C W D Christina G. & James Newton o- F W 4227 West 17th `� 0 o e Hawthorne, CA 90250 S �: U W w.. 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 April 24, 1978 LEGAL NOTICE CITY OF PALM DESERT REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP TO CREATE 101 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS AND 3 LOTS TO PROVIDE FOR A DISTRICT COMMERCIAL CENTER, A COMMON RECREATION AREA AND OPEN SPACE FROM A 40 ACRE PARCEL LOCATED AT THE SOUTH- EAST CORNER OF COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE AND MONTEREY AVENUE. CASE NO. TT 11791 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by the MCBAIL COMPANY for approval of a Tentative Tract Map to create 101 single-family residential lots and 3 lots to provide for a District Commercial Center, a common re- creation area and open space from a 40 acre parcel located within the P.C. (2) (Planned Commercial , District) and R-2 8,000 (Single-family residential , 8,000 sq. ft. of site area/du) zones, Upon Annexation, at the southeast corner of Country Club Drive and Monterey Avenue, more particularly described as : APN 621-190-045-8 APN 621-150-002-9 COUNTRY CLUB OR/YE -- .•�..r..•a- - - +` IT 11791 W W CX U L- N CIANCY SAID Public Hearing will be held on Wednesday, May 17, 1978, at 1 :00 `the Council Chambers in the Palm Desert City Hall , 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane,' Palm Desert, California, at which time and place, all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. PAUL A. WILLIAMS, Secretary Palm Desert Planning Commission PUBLISH: Palm Desert Post April 27, 1978 1 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 April 24, 1978 LEGAL NOTICE CITY OF PALM DESERT REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF A DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND PRE- LIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW TO PROVIDE FOR A DISTRICT COM- MERCIAL-SHOPPING CENTER TO BE LOCATED ON APPROXIMATELY 11 .71 ACRES AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF COUNTRY CLUB AND MONTEREY AVENUE. CASE NOS. DP 03-78 & 80C NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by the MCBAIL COMPANY -for approval of a Development Plan and Preliminary Design Review to provide for a district commercial center to De comprised of a main commer- cial structure which will include both a supermarket and ancillary shops and two satillite structures, one to be an automobile service station, the other containing offices and a restaurant on approximately 11 .71 acres lo- cated within the P.C. (2) , U.A. (Planned Commercial , District, Upon Annexa- tion) zone at the southeast corner of Country Club Drive and Monterey Ave- nue; more particularly described as: APN 621-190-045-8 APN 621-150-002-9 COUNTRY CLUB OR/VE 1( 1rL Lyy i. - m e - h 41 e - x g IANA-� C , li �.._ , . 8 I ❑C� � I 77. V1 IF SAID Public Hearing will be held on Wednesday, May .17, 1978, at 1 :00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Palm Desert City Hall , 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place, all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. PAUL A. WILLIAMS, Secretary Palm Desert Planning Commission PUBLISH: Palm Desert Post April 27, 1978 �v�4 . J� �1�� 17� ,� LS 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Case No. : TT 11791 Project: Tentative Tract Map Applicant: MCBAIL COMPANY Enclosed please find materials describing a project for which the following is being requested: Approval of a Tentative Tract Map to create 101 single-family residential lots and 3 lots to provide for a District Commercial Center, a common recreation area and open space from a 40 acre parcel located within the P.C. (2) (Planned Commercial , District) and R-2 8,000 (Single-family Residential , 8,000 sq. ft. of site area/du) zones, Upon Annexation, at the southeast corner of Country Club and Monterey Avenue. The attached data was prepared by the applicant and is being forwarded to you for. comments and recommended Conditions of Approval . The City is interested in the probable impacts on the natural environment (e.g. water and air pollution) and on public resources (e.g. demand for . schools, hospitals, parks, power generation, sewage treatment, etc. ) Your comments and recommended conditions of approval must be received by this office prior to 5:00 p.m. April 25th , 1978, in order to be discussed by the Land Division Committee at their meeting of April 26th The Land Division Committee (comprised of Director of Environmental Services , City Building Official , City Engineer, Fire Marshal and a representative of CVCWD) will discuss the comments and recommended conditions of approval and will forward them to the Planning Commission through the staff report. Any information received by this office after the receipt deadline will not be discussed by the Land Division Com- mittee nor will it be forwarded to the Planning Commission for consid- eration. Very truly yours, Paul A. Williams Director of Environmental Services PAW/ks PLEASE RETURN MAP WITH COMMENTS CIRCULATION LIST FOR ALL CASES Circulation of Tentative Maps, Parcel Maps, CUP'S, GPA's, etc: REVIEW COMMITTEE: ✓1. Palm Desert Director of Environmental Services - Paul Williams �L. Palm Desert Director of Building & Safety - Jim Hill �3. Palm Desert Director of Public Works - L. Clyde Beebe 4. Palm Desert Fire Marshall - Bud Engel 5. Robert P. Brock Office of Road Commissioner and County Surveyor Administration Office Building, Room 313 46-209 Oasis Street Indio, California 92201 (Phone: 347-8511, ext 267) /6. Lloyd Rogers v Supervisor - Riverside County Health Department County Administration Building, Roomdt• 46-209 Oasis Street Indio, California 92201 (Phone: 347-8511, ext 287) 7 Lowell 0. Weeks General Manager - Chief Engineer Coachella Valley County Water District (C.V.C,W.D. ) P. 0. Box 1058 Coachella, California 92236 (Phone: (714) 398-2651) 8. R. J. Lowry Project Development Services California Department of Transportation P. 0. Box 231 San Bernardino, California 92403 (Phone: (714) 383-4671 ) 9. - Director of Planning and Building City of Indian Wells 45-300 Club Drive Indian Wells, California 92260 (Phone: 345-2831) 10. Director of Planning City of Rancho Mirage 69-825 Highway 111 Rancho Mirage, California 92270 (Phone: 328-8871) �1. Kermit Martin Southern California Edison Company P. 0. Box 203 Palm Desert, California 92260 (Phone: 346-8660) 12. Chuck Morris General Telephone Company 62-147 Desertaire Road Joshua Tree, California 92252 (Phone: 366-8389) 13. , R. W. Riddell ✓/ Engineering Department Southern California Gas Company P. 0. Box 2200 Riverside, California 92506 (Phone: 327-8531, ask for Riverside extension 214) Circulation List for All Cases Page Two 14. Roger Harlow Director - Pupil Personnel Service Desert Sands Unified School District 83-049 Avenue 46 Indio, California 92201 (Phone: 347-4071) 15. Jim Langdon Palm Desert Disposal Services, Inc. 36-711 Cathedral Canyon Drive P. 0. Drawer LL Cathedral City, California 92234 (Phone: 328-2585 or 328-4687) 16. Stanley Sayles President, Palm Desert Community Services District 44-500 Portola Avenue Palm Desert, California 92260 (Phone: 346-6338) 17. Regional Water Quality Control Board 73-271 Highway 111 , Suite' 21 Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 (Phone: ) 18. Harold Horsley Foreman/Mails U. S. Post Office Palm Desert, California 92260 (Phone: 346-3864) 19. Joe Benes Vice President & General Manager Coachella Valley Television P. 0. Box 368 Palm Desert, California 92260 (Phone: 346-8157) 20. Don McNeely President - Palm Desert Chamber of Commerce P. 0. Box 908 Palm Desert, California 92260 (Phone: 346-6111) 21. Scott McClellan, Senior Planner Riverside County Planning Commission County Administration Building, Room 304 46-209 Oasis Street Indio, California 92201 (Phone: 347-8511, ext. 277, 278, & 279) 22. James Whitehead Superintendent - District 6 State Parks and Recreation 1350 Front Street, Room 6054 San Diego, California 92101 (Phone: (714) 236-7411) `23. Les Pricer Redevelopment Agency 73-677 Highway 111 Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 (Phone: 346-6920 24. Robert I . Pitchford, Chairman Architectural Committee of the Palm Desert Property Owners Assoc. 73-833 E1 Paseo Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 ri 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 April 3, 1978 Mr. Michael R. Gallagher 3732 Mt. Diablo Blvd. Lafayette, CA 94549 Dear Mr. Gallagher: Due to delays being experienced as a result of requirements for the legal noticing of the Negative Declaration sstaed�far-A xation No. 5, your cases, Case No. DP 03-78 and �ase No. TT 1179 ill be heard by the Palm Desert Planning Commissioh otrMaq��'1 78 at 1 :00 P.M. If you have any questions please contact our office. ruly yours, Paul A. Williams, A.I .P. Director of Environmental Services rjc/pw/ks cc: Ron Wells VTN Consolidated Inc. 2301 Campus Dr. P. 0. Box C 19529 Irvine, CA 92713 McBail Company P. 0. Box No. 19102 Las Vegas, NV 89119 G � 0r 'I L 2301 Campus Drive P.O. Box C-19529 Irvine,CA 92713—(714) 833-2450 Engineers • Architects • Planners TWX: 91 0-59 51 534 VTN OR IRIN March 23, 1978 Mr. Paul Williams AIP Planning Director City of Palm Desert Palm Desert, CA Reference: McBail Company Project, Tentative Tract 11791 Dear Paul , Please be advised that I will be leaving VTN, effective March 31, 1978, and beginning work immediately for. the McBail Company. In my new capacity, I will continue my present responsibilities for processing the above-cited project through the City of Palm Desert. VTN will remain the principal engineering consultant. The contact people are as follows: Stan Schupp VTN San Bernardino (714)889-4431 353 W. 6th Street,P.O. Box 145 San Bernardino, CA 92402 Ron- Wells VTN-Consolidated, Inc. (714)833'-2450 2301 Campus Drive, P.O. Box 19529 ,� Irvine, CA 92713 Please direct all correspondence to me at the following address: Michael R. Gallagher 3732 Mt. Diablo Boulevard . Lafayette, CA 94549 (415)254-5800 With copies to J.W. Hibbetts in Las Vegas and VTN as appropriate. We all would appreciate your assistance during this transition. Very truly yot; J. CD AMRGI a MAR 2; 147g c ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES cc: Stan SchHibbetts CITY OF PALM DESERT CERTIFIED PROPERTY OWNERS' LIST AFFIDAVIT STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) CITY OF PAL}1 DESERT ) I Michael R. Gallagher, VTN. , agent for McBail Co. hereby certify that the attached list contains the names and addresses of all persons to whom all property is assessed as they appear on the latest available assess- ment role of the County within the area described on the attached application and for a distance of three hundred (300) feet from the exterior boundaries of the property described on the attached application. I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. i (signed) age Mic el R. Ga ag r, (date) rch 3, 1 78 . '\[iC hHU AUUKL33r3 V1' V1'1UVV.f(1I C FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON • CASE NO. JOB ,._ . _PARCEL NO. NAME ADDRESS 621-190-045 Desert Land Investment Box 258 c/o O.Michael Homme Palm Desert, CA 92260 621-190-002 Desert Land Invest c/o 0. Michael Homme 621-190-079 Foundation for Retarded P.O. Box 1183 Children Palm Desert, CA 92260 621-190-004 Moultray, William G. 7071 Conway Ct. San Diego, CA 92111 621-190-052 Dietrich, Robert H. 835 Seagull Lane Apt. C. 115 Newport Beach, CA 92660 621-190-051 Shapiro, Raymond 2127 Amelia Avenue San Pedro, CA 90731 621-190-050 Lolito, Christopher 437 Audraine Drive Glendale, CA 91202 621-1-90-049 Lolito, Carlo 2147 Sunset Blvd. Los Angeles, CA 90026 621-190-048 Winter, Matherine M. 4554 Indian Wells Lane Palm Desert, CA 92260 621-190-047 Shapiro, Faye 22351 Platino Street Mission Viejo, CA 92675 620-1801003 E & J Investments c/o BG Custom Craft George Bernard 4901 N. Morena #904 San Diego, CA 92117 620-180-004 Mottle, Fred R Et Al 39687 Palm Greens Pkwy Palm Desert, CA 92260, 621-140-008 Troy, Sarah Jane Et Al 835 Myrtle Avenue Brooklyn, NY 11206 620-070-018 Newton, Chrstina G 422 es Newton, James W. Hawthorne, CA 90250 to - i COUNTRY lB o 79 O O O ® I _ 400' 9 199.69 Ie 3 T � 1 S ' •�D�L-•. -.iSTt I .w.--r.... Lai: 2fT2 fit[ 46 5/7l F4.4 475-Ac 475t14c 4.75t.4c 475f A 4.75fAc 475.1Ac -4.75tAc PhIZ�I=:L. MAP of P12oP ,, 5z ss ,,J WITHIN ;00 OF SU b� tcf--r a 2301 Campus Drive P.O. Box C-19529 Irvine,CA 92713—(714) 833-2450 Engineers Architects • Planners TWX: 910 5951534 VTN OR IRIN February 28, 1978 Department of Environmental Services City of Palm Desert Palm Desert, CA Attention: Planning Division Gentlemen: On behalf of our client, the McBail Company, we hereby submit Tentative Tract Map 11791 for formal review and approval . This application is prepared in accordance with pertinent City ordinances and regulations. Accompanying this letter are the following required submittal items: 1. Completed application -form signed by our client and Desert Lands Investment Co. , owner of record. 2. Thirty fold copies of Tentative Tract Map 11791 3. Processing fee of $510.00 ($250.00 + $2.50 x 104) 4. Surrounding property owners list and map In addition, we are submitting the following supplemental reports and exhibits: 5. Preliminary Soils Report 6. Ten copies of the preliminary grading, drainage and utility plans for the subject tentative tract map 7. Protective Covenants 8. One set of plans containing the following exhibits: a. Preliminary siting plan for residential development b. Preliminary site plan for planned district commercial site I �A Page Two City of Palm Desert February 28, 1978 c. Conceptual details for residential development d. Preliminary landscape plans for residential and commercial development. We trust this submittal is complete and adequate for the intended purpose. Please advise if questions arise or further information is required. Very truly yours, VTN CONSOLIDATED, INC. Mich 1 R. Gall , Senio Land P1 ner MRGcb Encs. cc: McBail Company 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE PALM DESERT CA. 92260 *TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP**y DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION McBail Company (Attn: J.W. Hibbetts) ApptWt >'§P&'C' S Vegas , NV 89119 (702)458-6418 Mailing Address Telephone A9=nt fnr �nnli ant VTN fnncnliiata j��11 Rnv ! 1gF9q Trvina CA 9271 -A ci'y Attn: Michael R.s�a9lagher zl° coae REQUEST: (Describe specific nature of approval requested) Approval of tentative tract 11791 , consisting of 101 residential numbered lots and three -non-residential lots PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: See attached title report ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 621 190 n45 R and 691 Inn-nn9-q EXISTING ZONING Riverside County R-1-0ne Acre Property OHner GuthOnioflon THE UNDERSIGNED ST TES THAT THEY AaE �fNE Ow RI51 OF PROP r TY OESCRI BED HEREIN AND HERESY G'",E AUTHOR- IZATION F TH 1 THIS APPL CATIdtl. n0. Michael , Honm a' y March 3, 1978 Desert Lands 4 TUNE al GATE AOPF.EMEHT ABSCLVING THE CITY OF PALM DESERT OF ALL LIABILITIES RELATIVE TO ANY DEED RESTRICTIONS. DO 8Y MY SIGNATURE ON THIS 1E JT, ADS TIOr THE OF APP C dlE TO T LPRI rOPERTY DES RA E IDD HEREIN. RES- 0. Michael Ho 0 3 1928 Desert I,�uids I men W. sl `A uRE t all Comp DATE Applicant's gijFblure VTN/Nficl 1 R. ,alla March 3 197R IGNAT DATE l FOR STA,F USE ONLY) ENVIRCNMENTAL STATUS ACCEPTED BY ❑ MINISTERIAL ACT E.A.Na. ❑ CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION CASE No. - ❑ NEGATIVC CECLARATION ❑ OTHER REFERENCE CASE '.0. °`• l . :: I: P,::t.r -erv;ces • • • �li�ilr r i 1 i r � _ Escrow Number: Mc BAIL_ COMPANY Title Number: 901595 3732 MT•DIAFLO BLVD. LAYFETTE, CA. 94563 Client's Reference: { { ' Buyer/Borrower: - - ATTN: WES BAILEY Property Address: .(PLEASE VERIFY) , i 1 PRELIMINARY HPOPT In response to the above referenced application for a policy of title insurance, Transamerica Title Insurance Company i.ereby reports 'that it is prepared to i=_sue, or cause to be issued, as of the date Hereof, a California Land T't !o Association Standard Coverave form Poliev of Title Insurance descriiiin; the land and the estate or in,.crest therein hereinafter set forth, insuring against loss which ma;: be sustnmed by reason of any defect. lien or,encumbrance not shown or referred to as an Exception below or not excluded from coverage purs::mt to the printed Schedules, Conditions and Stipulations of said policy form. This report (snd any supplements or amendments thereto) is issued solely for the purpose of facili- tating the issuance of a policy of title insurance and no liability is assurned hereby. If it is desired that i liability be assumed ,)rior to the issuance of a .poiicy of title insurance, a Binder or Conmrtmcnt should a be requested. Dated as of SEF_-M-BER 12, 197,7at 7:00 A.M. DENISE tiILLIA-'SON jThe estate or interest in the land hereinafter described or referred to covered by this Report is: i FEE SI:SPLE i Title to said estate or interest at the date hereof is vested in: i DESERT LAP:": INVESTMENT CO.. , A LIMITED PARTERSHIP, AS TO PARCEL NO. 1; AND _ESFRT LAND INVESTIEENT CO. , 110. 2 , A LIMITED PAR`i Tv.S1iIP, AS TO PARC_� NO. 2 . At the date hereof : \ceptions to coverage in addition to the printed exceptions and exclusions contained, in said policy foa71: '• ,"ald be as follows: ;m An. 734 A-1. TAXES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1977-1978 , A LIEN NOT YET DUE AND PAYABLE. A-2. TAXES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1976-1977, A LIEN NOW DUE AND PAYABLE, AS . FOLLOWS: FIRST INSTALLMENT : $682 . 43 - PAID SECOND_INSTALLMENT : $682 . 43 - PAID ACCOUNT NO. 621-190-002-9 LAND VALUE $10 , 810 .00, IMPROVEMENT NONE EXEMPTION NONE CODE AREA NO. 75-027 AFFECTS PARCEL NO. 2 A-3 . FIRST INSTALLIENT : $368 . 04 - PAID SECOND INSTALLMENT : $368 . 04 - PAID ACCOUNT 140 . : 621-190-045-8 LAND VALUE : $5, 830 .00 IMPROVEMENT : DONE EXEMPTION NONE CODE AREA NO. : 750027 AFFECTS : PARCEL NO. 1 A=4 . WATER AVAILABILITY CHARGES DUE COACHELLA VALLEY COUNTY WATER DISTRICT IF ANY -- REPORT TO FOLLOW. 1 . RIGHTS OF THE PUBLIC, COUNTY AND/OR CITY IN THAT PORTION LYING WITHIN THE STREET AS IT NOW EXISTS : AVENUE STREET NAME s CO3U TPY CLUB DRIVE AND MONTEREY i 2. DEED OF TRUST FOR THE ORIGINAL AMOUNT SHOWN BELOW, AND ANY OTHER A14OUNTS PAYABLE UDNER' THE TERMS THEREOF. ORIGINAL AMOUNT : $43,200 .00 DATED : MAY 29 , 1973 RECORDED : OFFICIAL RECORDS , AUGUST 7, 1973 INSTRUMENT NO . : 103492 TRUSTOR DESERT LANDS INVESTMENT COMPANY, A LIMITED P.`.RTiiERSHI? TRUSTEE : UNITED CALIFORNIA BANK, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION BENEFICIARY : 'WILLIAM A. NAYLOR AND VALENA M. NAYLOR, HUSBAND AND WIFE AS JOINT TENANTS AS TO AN UNDIVIDED 1/3 INTEREST; DIARGARET BUSH, A WIDOW, AS TO AN UNDIVIDED 1/3 INTEREST; EDITH EDDY ;MART, A SINGLE WOLAN; AS TO AN UNDIVIDED 1/6 INTEREST; AND LEIFE REICKSON, A SINGLE T'70 AN, AS TO AN UNDIVIDED 1/6TH INTEREST. AFFECTS PARCEL NO . 1 3. DEED OF TRUST FOR THE ORIGINAL AMOUNT SHOWN BELOW AND ANY OTHER AMOUNTS PAYABLE UNDER THE TER-NIS THEREOF. ORIGINAL IU4OUNT : $65,926 .99 DATED : MAY 26 , 1977. ' RECORDED : OFFICIAL RECORDS, JUNE 10 , 1977 INSTRUMENT NO . :• 106662 TRUSTOR : DESERT LAND INVESTMENT CO . , NO . 2 , P_ LIMITED PARTNERSHIP TRUSTEE : UNITED CLAIFORil-IA BANK, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION BENEFICIARY : J . BLAKE FIELD AND MARIANA H. FIELD, HUSBAND AND WIFE AFFECTS PARCEL NO. 2 4. DEED OF TRUST FOR THE ORIGINAL AMOUNT SHOWN BELOW, AND ANY OTHER AMOUNTS PAYABLE UNDER TIDE TERMS THEREOF . ORIGINAL AMOUNT . : $46 ,573. 01 DATED : MAY 26 , 1977— RECORDED : OFFICIAL RECORDS , JUNE 101 1977 INSTRUMENT NO. : 106663 TRUSTOR DESERT LAND INVESTMENT CO . , NO. 2 , A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP TRUSTEE : UNITED CALIFORNIA BANK, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION BENEFICIARY ARDEN S . MORRIS AND HENRIETTE R. MORRIS, HUSBAND NAD WIFE AFFECTS PARCEL NO. 2 . md i Ar DESCRIPTION: PARCEL NO. 1 : ALL THAT REAL PROPERTY IN THE UNINCORPORATED AREA, COUNTY OF . RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS : THE WEST 15 ACRES OF THE WEST—HALF OF THE NORTH—HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 6 EAST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT OF SAID LAND FILED IN THE DISTRICT LAND OFFICE. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE NORTH 44 FEET CONVEYED TO THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE BY DEED RECORDED APRIL 14 , 1953 IN BOOK 2254 , PAGE 592 , OFFICIAL RECORDS . ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE WESTERLY RECTANGULAR 54 FEET CONVEYED TO THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE BY DEED RECORDED MARCH 1 , 1973 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 26644 . ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM ONE—SIXTEENTH OF ALL OIL, COAL, GAS AND OTHER MINERAL DEPOSITS AS RESERVED TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA BY PATENT RECORDED NO V. 28 — 1949 IN BOOK 1127 , PAGE 42 OFFICIAL RECORDS . PARCEL NO. 2 : THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 6 EAST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO AN OFFICIAL PLAT OF SAID LAND FILED IN THE DISTRICT LAND OFFICE; EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE WESTERLY 15 ACRES; ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE NORTHERLY 44 FEET, AS CONVEYED TO THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE BY DEED RECORDED APRIL 14 , 1958 IN BOOK 2254 PAGE 592 OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY RECORDS ; ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM 1/16TH OF ALL COAL, OIL, GAS AND OTHER MINERAL DEPOSITS IN SAID LAND, AS RESERVED IN PATENT TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, RECORDED NOVEMBER 28 , 1949 IN BOOK 1127 , PAGE 42 OFFICIAL RECORDS . (100%) AS TO PARCEL NO . 1 SPECIAL INFORMATION (80%) AS ,TO PARCEL NO. 2 Unless shown in the body of this preliminary report there appears of record no transfers or agree- ments to transfer the land described herein recorded during the period of six months prior to the date of this report, except as follows: NONE .. .n '. _•.. i._ T. C A. rsa�, rsn - N 2 SEC 8 T. 55. R. o . �09 A L I ncL NO 1 /w J! I / t A 0 i 1 1 5 2 .' I i /ts� - I I 00 I _ I I � O-rA R/S J41 SR 20 - - ASSESSOR'S ggar 1257 1 .. .. - A Service of Trawame+ica Corporatioe "ITC Tc Vf'' A Cir,.',!^7 ❑1FP Tc /V-1 TTLT L-PnM T1',TM1 QW.-, T ZV (l."PTOTAT �-r*n-nq -- -- PRELIIUNARY DRAFT DECLARAi (ON OF BUILDING AND USE RESTRILi IONS " c•. FOR RESIDENTIAL LOTS KNOW ALL 14EN BY TITS PRESENTS: That the undersigned, being the owner of all the property and premises situated in the County of Riverside, State of California, described as follows.: All lots in Tract 11791, Gity 0f Pdlii Dese-rt,• RiversidA'County, California _ Does hereby establish the following restructions upon the use and enjoyment of the. lots in said subdivision. (1) Said lots shall be known and described as "Residential .Building Lots" and used for those purposes only. (2) No structure shall be erected, altered, placed or permitted to remain on any of said lots, other than one detached single-family dwelling; not to exceed- two stories in height, and private garage and storage room, one story in height. One lot may be combined with a part of a contiguous lot with one or more contiguous lots and be construed as one lot within the meaning of these restrictions. (3) Dwelling cost, quality and size: No dwelling shall be permitted on any lot at a cost of less than $10,000.00 based upon cost levels prevailing on the date these covenants are recorded, it being the intention and purpose of the covenant to assure that all dwellings shall be of a quality of workmanship and materials substantially the same or better than that which can be produced on the date these covenants are recorded at the minimum cost stated herein for the minimum permitted dwelling size. The ground floor area of the main structure, exclusive of one-story open porches and garages, . shall be not less thanj&q y square feet for a one-store dwelling, nor less than 1336 square feet for a dwelling of more than one story. (4) No residential building shall be located on any lot nearer to the front lot line or nearer to the side street line than the minimum building setback lines shown on the recorded plat. No residential dwelling shall be located on any interior lot nearer than 25 feet to the rear lot line. In any event , no building shall be located on any lot nearer than 25 feet from the front lot line or nearer than 15 feet to any side street line on corner lots , or nearer than 5 feet to an interior lot line excepting that a minimum 3 foot side yard shall be required for a garage or other permitted accessory building placed 20 feet or more to the rear of the build- ing setback line. No residential dwelling shall be located nearer than 25 feet from the rear lot line and all residential dwellings on said lots shall face the front street. The front street shall be determined as the street on which a 25 foot building line is shown on the recorded plat. For the purpose of the covenant , eaves, steps and open porches shall not be considered as a part of a building, providing, however, that this shall not be construed to permit any portion of a building on a lot to encroach upon a- nother lot. (5) No residential building site shall be used for business , nor any activities conducted of an offensive nature, nor any activities creating a nuisance by noise or otherwise, nor any activities creating a noxious odor : except developer may use any number of lots necessary for construction yard, sample houses and offices while engaged in the construction and sale of houses in this sub- division. (6) . No temporary house, trailer, garage, tent or other buildings can be placed, or erected upon any part of this subdivision and occu- pied as living quarters , However, during the construction of a house on any lot , any necessary temporary building may be erected and maintained by the person constructing the house; no person shall occupy or live in any house until it is completed, painted, and ready for occupancy. ( No fence shall be erected or penoitted to refrain bct,:een the street and t front setback line to r>:ccec IC height of three (3) feet ; nor shall any hedge therein be permitted to exceed the. height of three (3), feet ; nor any fence , wall or hedge placed or erected elsewhere on 'said premises be more than sir. (6) feet in height. . (7) Sight distance at intersections. No fence , wall , hedge or shrub planting which obstructs sight lines at elevations between 2 and 6 feet above the roadways shall be placed or permitted to remain on any corner lot within the triangular area formed by the street property lines and a line connecting them at points 25 feet from I the intersectiQnepf the street lines or in the case of a rounded property corner from the intersection of the street property lines extended. The same sight-line limitations shall apply on any lot within 10 feet from the intersection of a street property line with the edge of a driveway or alley pavement . No tree shall be permitted to remain within such distances of such intersections unless the foliage line is maintained at sufficient height to pre- vent obstruction of such sight lines. (8) No animals including dogs , .cats , poultry, fowl , ' rabbits , etc. , shall be kept , maintained or raised on the premises for commer=. cial purposes and not more than a total of four cats or dogs shall be maintained on the premises at any time in any event. (9) Oil and Mining Operations. No oil drilling, oil development, operation, oil refining, quarrying or mining operations of any kind shall be permitted upon or in any lot, nor shall oil wells , tanks , tunnels , mineral excavations or shafts be permitted upon or in any lot. No derrick or other structure designed for use in boring for oil or natural gas shall be erected, amintained or per- mitted in or upon any lot. 0 0) No trucks, trailers , boats, or unlicensed motor vehicles of any kind shall be kept, parked in or upon any portion of said property between the street and the front setback line , except in a completely covered carport or garace. 0 1) No sign of any kind shall be displayed to the public view on any lot except one professional sign of not more than one square foot , one sign of not more than five square feet advertising the prop- erty for sale or rent , or signs used by a builder to advertise the property during the construction and sales period. (12) Garbage and refuse disposal : No lot shall be used or maintained as a dumping ground for rubbish. Trash, garbage or other waste shall not be kept except in sanitary containers. All incinerators or other equipment for the storage or disposal of any such material shall be kept in a clean and sanitary condition. (13) Easements for installation and maintenance of utilities and drain- age facilities are reserved as shown on the recorded plat. .(14) That each grantee of a lot in said tract agrees for himself and his assigns that he will not in any way interfere with the estab- lished drainage pattern over his lot from adjoining or other lots in said tract , or that he will make adequate provisions for proper drainage in the event it is necessary to change the established drainage over his lot . For the purposes hereof, "Established" drainage is defined as the drainage which occurred at the time the overall grading of said tract, including the landscaping of each lot in said -tract, was completed by the undersigned grantor. -2- 115) There is her, created an Architectural Co of Com:nitte to he composed of: WESLEY BAILEY P.O. Box 458 Orinda, California JANES W. HIBBETTS P.O. Box 19102 Las Vegas , Nevada ROBERT M. HIBBETTS P.O. Box 19102 Las Vegas , Nevada to provide for architectural control and design and in order- to provide for a planned neighborhood. A majority of the corumitte may designate a representative to act for it , and it will be the responsibility of this committee to approve all pains for dwellings to be constructed on any of the property covered herein. In the event of death or resignation of any member of the committee, the remaining members shall have full authoriY'� to designate a succes- sor. Neither the members of the committee nor its designated re- presentative shall be entitled to any compensation for services performed pursuant to this covenant. At any time the then record owners of a majority of the lots shall have the power through a duly recorded written instrument to change the membership of the committee or to withdraw from the committee or restore it to any of its powers and duties. The committee ' s approval or disapproval as required in these cov- . enants shall be in writing. In the event the committee, or its designated representative fails to approve or disapprove within 30 days after plans and specifications have been submitted to it , or in any event, if not suit to enjoin the construction has been commenced prior to the completion thereof, approval will not be required and the related covenants shall be deemed to have been fully complied with. I (16) Term. These covenants are to run with the land and shall be binding on all parties and all persons claiming under them for a period of 30 years from the date these covenants are recorded , after which time said covenants shall be automatically extended for successive periods of 10 years unless an instrument signed -- by a majority of the then owners of-the--lots- has been recorded, agreeing to change said covenants in whole or in part . (17) Enforcement. Enforcement shall be by proceedings at law or in equity against any person or persons violating or attempting to violate any covenant either to restrain violation or to re- cover damages. (18) Severability. Invalidation of any one of these covenants by judgment or court order shall in no way affect any of the other provisions which shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed these presents the _ day of 197 . _3- .. .....r+oa.snn�a.e...�a -e. YIl9TT"'J•:^i;y Y�rer PLEASE DETACH BEFORE DEPOSITING McBAR COMPANY IN.EM DETACHED • FAI. THE A..YE CHECK SEC oMEE A NO OTHER RECEIPT NECESSARY RECEIPT IN FULL PAYMENT OF THE FOLLOWING ACCOt" DATE D E S C R I P T I O N AMOUNT OF DISCOUNT OTHER AMOUN, INVOICE DEDUCTIONS CHECK Tentative Tract Map Submittal and Initial Environmental Study 540. 00 101 Lot Subdivision Located at Country Club Drive & Monterey Drive, Tentative Tract No. 11791, Palm Desert, California �3S �� V��Engineers Ca ADri, s Planners 230'�'Camnoi Drip J.Box C-195291 Irvme,Cahforma 9u1317141833-2450 Michael R. Gallagher,AIP Senior Land Planner CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA TREASURER'S RECEIPT 1214 Received of: '//� -f x Date c3!- R._ 7 �/ > m UL For Account No. Amount '< N) to W .., m Received : IT�Y��R. frSURER w W O b � T0101 Q a O u V1 I W GG 66'• M G� ��ILE�4� C%ES- o EN�9c� (7 7.0" %J t foal X oe Noll, �• . �s ....... (� �D 1 � t �g1 ? 60, 30, o Q zo 131.49' S • Zp 8b �•?.G y itM UMA Q C191J�2T - 1-V I L.60' 37.qs, MAPPili SCo Gt� T.C. '�' V) t ❑ Fd:F EES",GR .� •. ' - d � o. �' : 1 D.R.J. AZTIO;. FORM tlils. a h •\ ONE YE Of T i f.R-iiJVALT_ma T- 1 N � 0. m _ 6 mVISEolv\ooa- uwiT- - LOT,GO 5-11 -b3 REVISED /Y`/-IDEL. UNIT' LOT 54 2-22-53 /OD� f Z} I ) ., Fo RF GFF ELEV AON58rOR9/ AGB SW.Oa•$ OO R 212g �. /'�i ^ _ 'i c � en/Lofs 7�25,26.ZZ ZC,21.9051/92 �i9, 34. 1'1B-B� 2!3•� 2� P 5-79 z,11 1 - i PEV. PAD EL£NS. LOTS ZZ,233S�9� /Z PLOT PLAN G3 m' z 957weR 62 w ti 2:.,__� � TRACT NO• /I79I 2.98' � OL.• i 69.25' • �. N. 3708-3 ' C . Desert Land Investment Fred R. Mottle Et Al 0. Michael Homme 39687 Palm Greens Pkway Box 258 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Foundation for Retarded Sarah Jane Troy Et Al Children 835 Myrtle Avenue P. 0. Box 1183 Brooklyn, NY 11206 Palm Desert, CA 92260 William G. Moultray Christi G. mes Newton 7071 Conway Ct. 4227 Wes th San Diego, CA 92111 Hawthorne, A 90250 Robert H. Dietrich VTN San Bernardino 835 Seagull Lane Apt. C115 353-W. 6th St. P. O. Box 145 Newport Beach, CA 92660 San Bernardino, CA 92402 Attn: Stan Schupp Raymond Shapiro VTN Consolidated, Inc. 2127 Amelia Avenue 2301 Campus Drive, POB C19529 San Pedro, CA 90731 Irvine, CA 92713 Attn: Ron Wells Christopher Lotito J. W. Hibbetts 437 Audraine Drive McBail Company Glendale, CA 91202 P. 0. Box 19102 Las Vegas, NV 89119 Carlo Lotito Michael R. Gallagher 2147 Sunset Blvd. McBail Co. Los Angeles, CA 90026 3732 Mt. Diablo Blvd. Ste. 390 Lafayett, CA 94549 Katherine M. Winter John Cipr6in 4554 Indian Wells Lane Palm Desert Greens Assoc. Palm Desert, CA 92260 73750 Country Club Dr. Palm Desert, CA 92260 Faye Shapiro _-Raff_-_ 801• S. :Lucerne_61�vd`.7kpt. 208 Los.sAngeles,;- CA 90005�a- -y E & J Investments George Bernard % BG Custom Craft 4901 N. Morena #904 San Diego, CA 92117. Fred R. Mot -e Et Al p39687 P m ' ns Pkw DP 03-78 & TT 11791 �%'��-�� Y 1 of 1 l U� - 12! 43r Es - 4 I• XIST1NG LAND USE P\ND -ZONING; VACANT R-1- ONE ACKE (COUNTY) P KU I=OSED LAND USE : l"�T_: Si 0aNTIAL - COV IV RZCIAL , - - _ 3. I '>= G G S UTILITIES LI T I S TO f�E S P V I C 1=. ICY T 1-1 L L WIN hG � nn��1 An T� cc�N��t�ul' _ WI l-T Th C MrD COUNT`( ' CL � I - Y Z 3' 9fi , �� `^ _ � � .• Wf�T�1� S>=f��/I D ICY T t=T 017SI n sTAn9� h .... . - . _ -- — --�- {� CE • CO\ChELL VP LL EY COUNTY WATE,CZ D15T Tr o -- I SSW fZ. . 5EKVI C ED tY: — --� I220 Y sI [DEWALK CO ACMF_LLN W\LEY COUNTY WATER DI57RICT 4 IO' _ . AD31TIONAL YfZV � vlcATloL so, LCT1 SZ\ IC =D fCOUNTRYCLU' �oo SOUT� � �N CAL1ffoK NIA tDI50N COMPANY 1 o0 1! GAS 5ffrVICED tY : goo� o LOT 104 �' o _`� SO U T i"1 121�1 C PAL 1 I�O R N I A GAS C OM?ANY Ln 5. 30 ^C1�>~Sw 00 " rnMr CI ^ L 0. ( NETS 390 �'�o DT E1 T _� �'I-10N � S� IZ�/IC -D by: ' �o I2 12 g � ►� �� c�' � � "43' CIE N >=Ktl\L TEL7rMON7 C0MffAN`( . 60, i , ,4. STKEET WrKOVENIENTS PEA CITY AND COUNTY 5TAND'\KDS. Q� • 3 5. PKoPoSEO ZONING K2- 8000 fi�L�NN _D D15T,RJGT f C COMME�GfAL. � . . _ EASEMENT o �o s- 10000 . L - , Iv � T r�- 0 000 , ro. A 7 DffG0IZi°�T 1✓ I� ALL ;O . Puff L�,-C �T�D LON0 rn0N TffIZr_Y 36 o O ,o _ n r- • . AV� . ;�N D 5�--T�1✓�N . LOT �' AND THE: fZESI BEN T 1,'\L LOTS. ISO 95 80 90 801, 80 96 101 0 ► oo I 00 0 - 0000 10000 tmo 91 _ b000, 000 4� _ - O S`� 'C �s 13 s I -o s s o I° 46 0 7 S�.�1O � Dl �I T DESERT SRNDS. UNIFIED MONTEREY - AVM Q o� = 14 . � 17 18 = 19 � ZD � �7 �, SUf�hOLINDl1�l� LANDS �IZ� �/�/�NT a o � � � loo n 12 - s9 ► N 1'�N u ND vElO E o co 'o o O 35 6s, �y 80 60 1� t -o + . zoo, a r D E P D. r 15 �� 601LOT 102 h o G 0 40 } 90� M -�` D °1500 - 80' ►35, 5T O O O 4 ` 30" 0' °` S ��, ..0�ff0 `T I O N o 0 1 w`" STD 1.6 0 AC lzES o 10' 0' 1: 10 - o 11 �; o 80 o - o a o \oo ii , o, ? - N \oo r•.� �o� Soo `� PALMS DR. y 4 ss 83 @)z ems, , ° 0 11500 aq Q o 81 0 o 9 rn _ 0 4 , 0 0 , (�q) 84 00 8000 o 48 b �' s ion 8 1 0 - p° D• D Q• o� 40 �p — $o 8000 �3 MffAN DrIRi NG 90 DODO _ ao G SI DELLALI�. 8000 90' N � . °� .� 9500 o ss' s5 , �, � o � Q / - COUNTRY cLUr� �R 1 NTfff� ► Of� ST �ETs ' . x7Tf1 SIDS 0 8 0' 0 6� Soo to®' � nn0 moo. s p0 S� ° 0 � � ROJhCT a Q 9 P r 4C' - �o[� - o� 77 0 79 54 sIT� I'VU�k GU L DE SACS �o r�/�u I 8s� OODO o ,� 78 O o 85 00 0 _ o - 10000 . 0 00 s 7� o _ � S , 2 s � 4� D _.• _ o o x" o _ �s 34 ro � o -�._ :y �o �, to ._, ,� _. op -2 _ L — — _ _ __ _ -- — i - - �. I NIT` ' �f ,.j. D w _ _\ _ �, t1 UT To S CAT.)= .: ,. °� o s c.��e Q 7S L(g ! - nUT TO'h � q 0 , p v- G .o ST 70 Q2) 3 zC / - 'o o ,,, o 0 0 8200 0 .� �, (96 o o S 87 •� s ,� 33� ST, a :� c —OO M . SO @72 �QQ OO / \O L . SST 74 N o 0 3 , b, oa ��ti too 73 80 �ti� s 00 . TAB .jULATED SU M MNKY _ 8200 �- y �`' 8D 0 M 820D o 23 o 2 o o �7 0 3 - �. 4 � � � 88 0 " �9or �O8' � - o\ ' IDOD� 32 � 0 31 o ioo - � - _ O_ C,IZosS AREA 40.0 Ac. o� iao, ' 1L1 goo' 000 �0 7[ o' f .- 70 � 8 �jDOD� � ,. t Zg o0Vq � . II -XTERIOR STREETS 3.42AC fll 24 40 4 �000 _ S U f SDI V I D E O • 2 � • 800n �o o f0000 � �\� ,o �- �poo ,�� INTER OR DRIVES R63AC, - o o �,� 8000_ 91 _ , ,, - i d- � 92 70 �o 2� 0 26 0 27 i 30 I C LLc;r l04 CC2MME KG A' L. S'Tf�. 9.3 JP\G. �, , � -Q _ do 0 , 8�00 LC�T,�102'" (ZEGREf�TIOt�! 1TE 1 .60 AG. 9000 Q ?K/ BpDQ Qp / r o 0 ,S, ,, „�, as s , �� 9 PO. bO NO- l 0 2 Q 4 LcUT 103 OrffN SP�\CE .06AC •�s W 93 s X 101, S.F CDfT U—lffD LOTS - S EV D� 89 I '� I�.80P�G. -• � �o' Qs� '2po� ST, � 120, L/�S V� Gt\ /� PIII �IMUr i LOT ARr-A 8000 S.i= 99 Ssf o N �200 $ 60, 5 , y 60 ti, 90 S5 � 8 � 0 6S 70 94 80 70 3� 9S �7 I 101 0 O - - @ ,--n- - (02 61 60-97 - - - �4 �3 _ d-NOTE • ALL r'IGUTES ARE /\P� ROX MA1FQ o �, O o 9� 10000 n �bo �� Q_ _ Aff FA �Y . 8500 �,OD 8500 - 8000 - ; 00 �000 !o0 00 8000 8�0 - 8�00 � �� 8voo- i , _ 0 6 S f 96 96 8 . 8 8 80 b0 90 80 85 <- _ . h r - w . ednso to Inc. • ENGINEW ARCHITECTS ' MANNERS s E cT P,z PET I NG I'oIZT tJK oP i 1-1 (,ff by C f KT I ffY T M AT T h f 1ZE C(D&D _ OW N E I ,S Or Tfi11 S UPS K Y A I0 LL THE: KU L " 2301 CAMPUS DRIVE, IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92bb4 p14!933-2190 PROPEKIY IN THE uNI NCor F0F\Alr_D Af\tA COUNTY Off KIvE SIDE PKOPEKTY CONSENT TO T,ME M LI NG O = Th15 ' Map r-- _ STATE of Ci�LI rOg NIA DfSC1\1 f DED AS Tt1E DIVEST 16 �CKES Ot= i T 0� N 0IZT1-I t1 AL 0 tIE WEST tlAl Tfl r r TH�I NORTHWEST t/4 0� Q - 5�C. 8 , TSS , 12 � � , S,fS.I'�:M., P�Nb Tt1� -WEST /2 0� THE NORTf-1 /2 SUP�SCIll E(� AND SWOI\N To. bE: �01�E M TftlS W\y 1R 1978 Of TI-Iff- O&TrlWff.ST I Off SffC. TSS RGE .M. Cc I NO. OF DOTS 101 U N /4 8 , S �.P� P� ORh N G . _ .;..... . 1 � .�±+► ; �l,r - •rc >.,: :<'-•-• . ,►fit. ,, .:. ; ; --,.._.. 4. .. ._.; r TO. -i\N O f-1C IAL PLAT Or SAD LAND FILED IN L Tt1E DISTRICT LAND � �fY� 4, y � �� DE/�/\/ :,. o � 4o (26.G � sl NT! PAL OFFICE. � g • T 3.., UNITS / ACPZE: _ T Iz Puf�ll - _ ��- _:COUNTY of oRAf�1GE DENSITY Y v? ,. STP\1E 0r CP�L11=01Z 2 �S D TE I I - � - C� OF �x PALM DESERT DEPARTMENT OF D D D EMVIRON6IENTAI. E D A SERVICES EXww , - 0 t Qcom mt�tAr. t�nar'•Y , coT �tZt1,' N' STT�-�tI" hM P IZ�VISl01rl .no. nfSGRTPTtot1 IN1T.