Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTT 12202 MONTEREY COUNTRY CLUB/CONDOS 1978 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT,CALI FOR NIA92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 March 28, 1979 Mr. Jack M. Conlon President Sunrise Company 42-000 Bob Hope Drive Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 Re: Tract 12202 - Street Names Dear Mr. Conlon: The City of Palm Desert does hereby approve the attached street names for Tract 12202. Please provide said names on the final tract map for recordation. Very truly yours, Paul A. Williams, AICP Director of Environmental Services lm/pw/ss cc: Lt. Renny, Riverside County Sheriffs Dept. Riverside County Road Dept. , Indio & Riverside Offices Postal Service, Palm Desert Branch Dave Ortegel , Palm Desert Fire Marshal Clyde Beebe, Director of Public Works James Hill , Director of Building and Safety Coachella Valley County Water District Southern California Edison Southern California Gas General Telephone Chamber of Commerce Tract 12202 File i� STREET NAMES MONTEREY COUNTRY CLUB (Area South of Channel ) TR 12202 MADRID AVENUE GIRALDA CIRCLE CASTELLANA WEST CASTELLANA SOUTH CASTELLANA EAST CASTELLANA NORTH CALLE DEL VERANO SEVILLE CIRCLE JUAN CIRCLE , ;x - ' 'I ��i��• a i ' a •3 ARga9✓ 9Y 4A�r id,ar b •bu a fie,_ Y�' +1 9 '�7 �•,{(yc� �p .,t + / / " 'S A O V ° *a O � • .:.,� 40 ,°ps "� 2.,.�{S ''y'� ye ?�aCye�i1, 111��t i / r • �-t 'a 1 Oa• n R a+ is ';T 1'4^�M, � ..�'µ..,� J' � � / I I / • .tyre " �� � i �gT ^ �E p /p� v � h:.I a bTr ' ' d I c A•• ` \ C ,i! O 4 1:. Y o O e e pre O� 0 oe 6 h^� � �.•�^! �RS}�t. 1 1t.q O��o O A + .. '.� • O r.,e ram..a.e r F„ � a � ? s ! r� Gg� � � •� a ylci�/ � i y a� p� � -�2'ee y f •_� r� Of, `O p _ �� \ '� �, � .a p �9 dt�,. �r 9 a •J v � gym.., ._ r`a;_ �' i1� 14 � d� Oe �.\�' i - .� a � ��: e+ a • ;� ! �": a r /�/,is� , - ,,- t•�`�'{q- �i�' �� pie / �, � Y , Y ., ~ ><' b/y � J ;o .`� "':1,! . `EPA �: i e 'A' g 't a r r t �,� :: d �� ��• �1i �"`"'+,j+o .7��1:•f f-r �Ft �r � e iO✓ h '��5 t°'o r u •.2 a' Y+ ,_..�� C�,�,,. • r ��� M } � � } 1 �+ t+�w '�►iJ o � s.�..tai MEW r • J 1 �^ • Vr e Count. y of Rim .�rside To. Paul A. Williams, A.I .P. , Director of nxTXE. November 1 . 1978 Environmental Services FROM• Jack Ruth, County Road Department - ,,,,,Street name for Tract 12202 Our records indicate the list of street names underlined in green do not represent conflicts , but the red ones have duplicate names in Palm Springs. JCR:fk RECEIVED NOV 6 1978 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CRY OF PALM DESERT GEN. FORM 4, 3/65 A vd S '• a ) R• aa+ d► � � � i.: �o A �Ck��ti,. M P .� i I Or 71 0 • > 777""" �6r� "S9 , I d 9 • Od•+� c. S ;.. O• o'b to a��y�- i�y 3 O '��. � /1)'1�Y1 � t ,•.� A•ifa p I . v i 1 IJ / • � R i s gQl'+.p0 • o ;,ay=^'{r " `9��s«.'. • 1 . as � »,i ���$a r �'��� a• a E�-�r,� ' �a ,y � � � 4,1 . r 0 . . r ��/� �• �?J rY •� e O o _ 1 iO o • • e �• r �0 ,,M1: � � • I�4.L .�. 'N8w Or�+ � A i :TY W� O 's.• p° °�.�__.• v Oe0 4_r.e o�: • +�Sw s• ofy\•+ Y � . �n;; r y >-0 � i� • .SPC',� � r~ g • � I e s� � p� � - • ,� + o' -_<_a A .� .�•�}y� /�'•. d�' : n t ('eY•1y'1 �\ ^'h_' p O \ y�: Y . a r••/,��'�"""1d��"" • ►/ Y.»�, r:.< J � ` F.>a :_� .�Oi t b 4� � y V " '1 � , /C" , off • '1'� �� �r i� e � � i s ILo � � f\. i �Y �y�•„ � � :., �` �L� Q�9 � r• O o, '�•`. •s �. fi i ` (^� �a �• r ' � +. 7 e � !r R Y► i• �` a � t • .w;n01 . p � ' t li 0� i ,>yq `:Sry..• 4'�E �'2R`+"^*C±I!��t6�y{� {� � �• _ •�� a �� I!4LL •S �`i � f ••'�, 1e��03��3! Li1a"`•�1 • gy�jS 4a'���• + + ' '�' 1+ WWA Wil A" • Pill, v. emall - - - -- -- - -_ ___ ' .s • UNRISE COMPANY 42-000 BOB HOPE DRIVE RANCHO MIRAGE. CALIF. 92270 TELEPHONE (714) 328-8945 - June 27, 1979 Mr., Clyde Beebe City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear. .Lane Palm Desert, :CA 92260 d_ Dear Clyde: In connection with the approval of Tract 12202 you recommended to the City Council that they require us to contribute $80, 000 to the City of Palm Desert for the installation of a traffic Signal at the intersection of Monterey Avenue and the southerly gate entrance of Monterey Country Club, which is immediately across from the entrance to Rancho Las Palmas Country. Club. Consistent with your great wisdom, Clyde, the Council did its part, we did our part and now its time for you to do your .part. ,i•s �• '. What is the status of the signal? It is going to be needed this fall. Sincerely yours, Jack M. Conlon President /rms cc: Marty Bouman Paul Williams INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM City of Palm Desert TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Approval of Final Map for Tract No. 12202 DATE: May 1 , 1979 Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 79-48 Approving Final Subdivision Map for Tract No. 12202 and Approving the Subdivision Agreement Relating Thereto. Discussion: This subdivision is located easterly of Monterey Avenue and southerly of Whitewater Wash. This tract is comprised of 153.50 acres and has 80 lots. The tentative tract map was approved in conjunction with the City Council approval of Annexation Map on May 3, 1978. The required Subdivision Agreement has been executed and approved by the City Attorney. The developer has 60 days hence to post the remaining bonds and to pay the required fees. Developers: Sunrise Company / 42-000 Bob Hope Drive / Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 (Mr. Jack Conlon) I - RESOLUTION NO. 79'-4g A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE FINAL SUBDIVISION MAP OF TRACT NO. 12202 AND APPROVING THE AGREEMENTS RELATING THERETO BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: . 1 . The Final Subdivision Map of Tract 12202, City of Palm Desert, California, is hereby approved as the official subdivision map of said tract, subject to the conditions of the Tentative Map. 2. The Mayor and City Clerk are authorized to execute on behalf of the City a Standard Subdivision Agreement guaranteeing completion of the public improvements required by law. 3. The City Engineer is authorized to receive the improvement security as required by law on behalf of the City, subject to the approval of the City Attorney as to form. 4. The City Engineer is directed to process the Final Map for recording upon receipt of the required improvement security and payment of all fees. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED on this day of , 1 1979, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: EDWARD D. MULLINS, MAYOR ATTEST: SHEILA R. GILLIGAN, City Clerk City of Palm Desert, California CASE 5 MINUTES REGULAR MEETING PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL THURSDAY, JANUARY 251' 1979 CITY HALLLL COUNCIL yCHAMBERS I. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Mullins called the Regular Meeting of the Palm Desert City Council to order at 7 :00 p .m. in City Hall Council Chambers . II. PLEDGE - Mayor Pro-Tempore Jim McPherson III. INVOCATION - Mayor Ed Mullins IV. ROLL CALL Present: Absent : Mayor Pro-Tem Jim McPherson Councilman Noel Brush Councilman Alexis Newbrander (Excused Absence) Councilman Roy Wilson Mayor Ed Mullins V. AWARDS , PRESENTATIONS , AND APPOINTMENTS None VI. CONSENT CALENDAR A. MINUTES of the Regular Meeting of the Palm Desert City Council of January 11, 1979 . Rec: Approve as presented. B. CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY TREASURY - Demand Nos . 79-0 5 and 79-071. Rec: Approve as presented. C. REQUEST FOR PERMISSION from Naegele Outdoor Advertising Company of Cali ornia, Inc. to Erect an Outdoor Advertising Display on Their Property Located on Highway 111 , North of Parkview. Rec : Refer to the City Manager for response, D. APPLICATION FOR ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE For MONTEREY COUNTRY CLUB , -500 Monterey Avenue, Pa m Desert , California, By CLUB LEASING CORPORATION. Rec: Receive and films�� ✓ E. REQUEST FOR APPROVAL Final Tract Map 13203 , nrise Corporation, Applicant. Rec: Waive further reading and adopt Resolution No. 79-1 , approving the final Tract Map and related agreements . January 25, 1979 Pagel INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM City of Palm Desert TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Approval of Final Map for Tract No. 13203 DATE: January 16, 1979 Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 79-1 Approving Final Subdivision Map for Tract No. 242H and the Agreement Relating Thereto yya S/ Discussion: This is the second unit to be subdivided by Sunrise Corporation. This tract is located on the easterly side of Monterey Avenue and on the soh side of the Whitewater Wash. The golf course portion is located in the Whitewater Wash. Tract No. 13203 is comprised of 11 lots on 28.26 acres. The subdivider has executed the required agreement, and he has 60 days in which to post the bonds and pay the required fees. Developer: Jack M. Conlon Sunrise Corporation 42-300 Bob Hope Drive Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 RESOLUTION NO. 79-1 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF,THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE FINAL SUBDIVISION MAP OF TRACT NO. 13203 AND APPROVING THE AGREEMENT RELATING THERETO BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: .. 17-Zb Z 1 . The Final Subdivision Map of Tract 3; City of Palm Desert, California, is hereby approved as the official subdivision map of said tract, subject to the conditions of the Tentative Map. 2. The Mayor and City Clerk are authorized to execute on behalf of the City a Standard Subdivision Agreement guaranteeing completion of the public improvements required by law. 3. The City Engineer is authorized to receive the improvement security as required by law on behalf of the City, subject to the approval of the City Attorney as to form. 4. The City Engineer is directed to process the Final Map for recording upon receipt of the required improvement security and payment of all fees. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED on this day of , 1979, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: EDWARD D. MULLINS, MAYOR ATTEST: SHEILA R. GILLIGAN, City Clerk City of Palm Desert, California Lam{ `%dolor Of 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 October 26, 1978 I � To: All Interested Parties Subject: Street Names for Tract 12202 The City of Palm Desert is currently considering the request for ap- proval of street names for Tract 12202. Please review the attached map and list of names proposed for the subdivision to determine whether they are acceptable or should be modified. All comments should be returned to the Dept. of Environmental Services, P. 0. Box 1977, Palm Desert, California, 92260, or call Mr. Lloyd Morgan at 714/346-0611 , ext. 51 . ruly yours, Paul A. Williams, A. I.P. Director of Environmental Services lm/pw/ks cc: Lt. Froemming, Riverside County Sheriffs Dept. Riverside County Road Dept. , Indio & Riverside Offices Postal Service, Palm Desert Branch Dave Ortegel , Palm Desert Fire Marshal Clyde Beebe, Director of Public Works James Hill , Director of Building and Safety Coachella Valley County Water District So. California Edison So. California Gas General Telephone Chamber of Commerce File STREET NAMES MONTEREY COUNTRY CLUB (Area South of Channel) 14ADRID AVENUE GIRALDA CIRCLE CASTELLANA WEST CASTELLANA SOUTH CASTELLANA EAST CASTELLANA NORTH CALLE DEL VERANO SEVILLE CIRCLE a -NVAIV CIRCLE 10/24/78 OCT24 COMPANY �CIlY OF pq� [S EBT, S 42-000 BOB HOPE DRIVE RANCHO MIRAGE, CALIF. 92270 TELEPHONE (714) 328-8945 October 24, 1978 Mr. Lloyd Morgan City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickley Pear Lane Palm Desert CA 92260 Dear Lloyd: We hereby request approval of the attached street names for that portion of Monterey Country Club lying south of the Whitewater Channel and north of the College of the Desert. Sincerely yours , Jack M. Conlon President /rms Attch. STREET NAMES MONTEREY COUNTRY CLUB (Area South of Channel) 14ADRID AVENUE GIRALDA CIRCLE CASTELLANA WEST CASTELLANA SOUTH CASTELLANA EAST CASTELLANA NORTH CALLE DEL VERANO SEVILLE CIRCLE ;?6+.4N CIRCLE 10/24/78 Fd •+ .t- . � ,.�' •A ._ ) v J 11 I . I / P,• ilia d w •r •�e a `6` ,y • ' � r , - / qr 9A �i7 • v V • .. Y�e y � � L ' 'r / � 9 4 • i0 a 4Qq l� •►� � � OO��r/ � � � • >. {tv yoQ,tr Ape , o � �, 9s �; '► /r • / r / _ yq � ,`� ,� . .I • l b r 0'0 t �' k, fr � • V r 0 •fi/Ofl • c pc �� - • C ��� • \ • y lO ,• o�era♦ q~Ae O•s e 6 j ,,.� ���i � er�� � f1 p \ ♦Jl �- � A a �—O" O^D_w�w_.,owe_° a.e s � e .��' O �� / II �i� 6 • � •�� � v' p + i °e, n • f �p i Y /�' �w•p♦�/`tl_ ,. �r • .. . ��';O:.a... / ► \� 6 • rt' f �� �j� A � r e^ 1 ,• pQ •'•A.7, �0 �!� ' .r� •, Os ` �. : �. ��� �`a � � y _ii `�' `w� � �� � * , � � C i �a�A�_ Oi ) Y � r� r 'r �• • ��. -.: � ® ,a•P ,, -- —�-''- - - - ...- �.-� � a • �' _ ^�!t r �.j. ��q '� '�. -'fie �►a"� N`dd- �t 1e � / ��-ttt • i�0 �- - .., e y ..r^,< <-F� � � 0 -��ry ��� , � y v �w �N - • r L Ma 5F �s Oe?r"bIr, ' ��a` IV�• • / :.a x�` . �\ Y —�� �. .�e. L'y� O -i '' �`:w�ev,Ona•"�^�"t'�,1 '"� t ,��L;1(i .,u. f � �I� •� `��1 �.f:".•_, isA'�'- � y�•~-' Sri���� r p :.'a��.. +.'�l' 1»' O `' a�•: P r 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 August 31 , 1978 Title Insurance & Trust Attn: Larry W. Violassi Subdivision Title Officer P. 0: Box 707 Riverside, CA 92502 Re: Tract 12202 Dear Mr. Violassi : Responding to your request of August 30, 1978, please be advised as follows: 1 . Present zoning is PR-5, Planned Residential - 5 dwellings per acre. 2. Adjacent zoning is: North - PR-5 South - PR-5 East - PR-4, S.P. West - City of Rancho Mirage 3. Copy of Notice of Exemption enclosed. To our knowledge this property is not within a Geological Hazard Study area. If there are any further questions, please contact our Staff of the Department of Environmental Services. Very truly yours, Paul A. Williams Zoning Administrator lm/pw/ks Enc. _y AUGUST 30, 1978 TITLE INSURANCE AND TRUST CITY OF PALM DESERT 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE PALM DESERT, CA 92260 ATTN: PLANNING DEPARTMENT RE TRACT NO. 12202 GENTLEMEN: WE HEREBY REQUEST THAT YOU FURNISH THIS OFFICE WITH THE FOLLOWING: 1. ZONING LETTER FOR SUBJECT PROPERTY AS WELL AS THE 2 4 TYPE OF ZONE AFFECTING THE ADJACENT PERIMETER PRO- 6 S PERTY; 2. NEGATIVE DECLARATION; AND 3. LETTER STATING WHETHER OR NOT THE ABOVE MENTIONED P PROPERTY, OR ANY PORTION THEREOF, IS WITHIN A GEO- LOGIC HAZARDS SPECIAL STUDIES ZONE: wry d THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS. REQUIRED FOR FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF REAL ESTATE, HOWEVER, WE ASK YOU TO FORWARD SAME TO THE UNDER- SIGNED FOR SUBMISSION TO SAID REAL ESTATE AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME. VERY TRULY YOURS: LARRY WY VIOLASSI SUBDIVISION TITLE OFFICER LWV/BRH RECEIVED AUG 311978 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES - CITY OF PALM DESERT Title Insurance and Trust Company 3490 Tenth Street P.O. Box 707 Riverside,California 92502 714 686 4180 ATICOR COMPANY 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT,CAUFORNIA92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 August 31 , 1978 I Title Insurance & Trust Attn: Larry W. Violassi Subdivision Title Officer P. 0. Box 707 Riverside, CA 92502 Re: Tract 12202 Dear Mr. Violassi : We are returning your letter of August 30, 1978, as all flood hazard information must be obtained from the Coachella Valley County Water District, Coachella, California. Very truly yours, Paul A. Williams Zoning Administrator `, lm/PW/ks OF AUGUST 30, 1978 TITLE INSURANCE AND TRUST CITY OF PALM DESERT 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE PALM DESERT, CA 92260 RE: TRACT NO. 12202 GENTLEMEN: REGARDING THE ABOVE MENTIONED PROJECT, PLEASE FURNISH THIS:OFFICE WITH A FINAL FLOOD HAZARD LETTER FOR FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF REAL ESTATE IN ASSOCIATION WITH AN APPLICATION FOR A FINAL PUB- LIC REPORT. VERY TRULY YOURS: c 60- vt.,l,�-,o�,r✓/, LARRY W VIOLASSI SUBDIVISION TITLE OFFICER LWV/BRH RECEIVED AUG 311978 ENVIRONMLNTAL SERVICES CITY OF PALM DESERT Title Insurance and Trust Company 3490 Tenth Street P.O.Box 707 Riverside,California 92502 714 686 4180 ATICOR COMPANY 'i 1�-� OL75 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 May 1 , 1978 LEGAL NOTICE CITY OF PALM DESERT REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP TO DIVIDE APPROXIMATELY 155 ACRES INTO 33 LOTS TO PROVIDE FOR APPROXIMATELY 460 CONDOMINIUM UNITS, COMMON RECREATION AREAS, WATER WELL SITES AND BUFFER AREAS ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED EAST OF MONTEREY AVENUE AND SOUTH OF THE PROPOSED DESERT SQUIRE COUNTRY CLUB. CASE NO. TT 12202 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held before the Palm Desert City Council to consider a request by the SUNRISE COMPANY for approval of a Tentative Tract Map to divide approximately 155 acres within the PR-5, S.P. (Plan- ned Residential , maximum 4 du/acre, Scenic Preservation overlay) and PR-6, S.P. (Planned Residential , maximum 6 du/acre Scenic Preservation Overlay) zones into 33 lots to provide for approximately 460 condominium units, common recreation areas, water well sites and buffer areas on property generally located east of Monterey Avenue and contiguous to the south border of the proposed Desert Squire Country Club, more particularly described as: Portion of South z of Sec. 8, T5S, R6E, S:B.M. and a portion of north i of Section 17, T5S, R6E, S.B.M. Stull 1 � 9 TT 12202 r 0 N 22W 6 .n.,r..n.oust art urir � CITY OF PALM OESEPT.Ch Llmll COLLEGE Cr jE ESERT i SAID Public Hearing will be held on Thursday, May 25, 1978, at 7:00 p.m. in-the Council Chambers in the Palm Desert City Hall , 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane, Palm Desert, California, at which time and,'place, all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. SHEILA.R:'.GILLIGAN, City Clerk City of Palm Desert, California PUBLISH: Palm Desert Post May 4, 1978 EIR FORM #1 CITY OF PALM DESERT NOTICE OF EXEMPTION Case No. : TT 12202 Applicant : SUNRISE CO:`- 42-000 Bob Hope Drive Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 Description of Project : Request for approval of a Tentative Tract Map to divide approxi- mately 155 acres within the PR-4, S .P. and PR-6, S .P. zones into 33 lots to provide for approximately 460 condominium units, com- mon recreation areas, water well sites and buffer areas on pro- perty generally located east of Monterey Avenue and contiguous to the south border of the proposed Desert Squire Country Club. Finding : Project will not have a significant adverse effect on the environ- ment and no further environmental documentation will be required. Justification : Project is exempt pursuant to Section 5(2) of the City of Palm Desert Resolution No. 77-7. The project lies within the COD Area:Specific Plan area for which an EIR was prepared. March' 13 , 1978 E . MINUTES of the Manager ' s Hearing on Proposed Use of Federal Revenue Sharing, Entitlement Held on Wednesday , May 17 , 1978 . Rec : Receive and file. F. APPLICATION FOR ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE By Charles P . & Joseph VLTRANO for PALM DESERT LIQUORS , 74- 121 Iligh%vay 111 , Palm Desert , California. Rec : Receive and file. G. APPLICATION FOR ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE By Larry G. FLOWERS for CORNED BEEF CENTER, 72-837 Highway Ili , Palm Desert , California. Rec : Receive and file . Councilman )McPherson moved and Councilman Brush seconded to approve the Consent Calendar as presented. Motion carried unanimously with the members present . VII . PUBLIC HEARI�� A. CASE NO. TT 12202 , Sunrise Company Applicant : Consideration of �Y Request for Appr '-al of a Tentative Tract Map to Divide App oximately 155 res into 33 Lots to Provide for Approxi- mate 460 C .0 minium Units , Common Recreation Areas , Water Well Sites and Buffer Areas on Property Generally Located East of Monterey Avenue and South of the Proposed Monterey Country Club. Mr. Williams reviewed the Staff Report outling the request . He stated that in review of this case , the Planning Commission had dealt with the major issues of increased traffic on Monterey , signalization fund contribution and the improve- ment of Magnesia Falls Drive . As a result of these dis- cussions , the Commission had approved 3 special conditions and recommended approval . Mr. Williams reviewed the special conditions. . Mayor Mullins declared the Public Hearing open and invited input in FAVOR of the project . MR. JACK CONLON, President , Sunrise Corporation , addressed the Council expressing his concurrence with Staff ' s report and requesting approval of the Tentative Tract Map . Mayor Mullins invited input in OPPOSITION to the project , and none was offered. He declared the Public Hearing closed. Councilman McPherson moved and Councilman Wilson seconded to waive further reading and adopt Resolution No. 78-62 , approving the Tentative Tract Map. 14otion carried unanimously with the members present . B. CONSIDERATION OF AN AMENDMENT to Resolution No . 76-1 Which Established Design Evaluation Criteria and Submittal Require- ments for Projects in the City of Palm Desert by Incorporating Additional Landscaping Standards . Mr. Williams reviewed the Staff Report , indicating that the request had originated with the Design Review Board and had been approved by the Planning Commission . The additional landscaping standards requested were complete front and side yard landscaping for single family resi- dences prior to occupancy , the size and type of trees to be required , and standards to be met for landscaping in parking areas. Mayor Mullins declared the Public [fearing open and invited input in FAVOR of the Amendment . None was offered. May 25 , 1978 Page 2 CITY OF PALM DESERT TRANSMITTAL LETTER I . TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council II . REQUEST: Request for approval of a Tentative Tract Map to divide approximately 155 acres within the PR-4, S.P. and PR-6, S.P. zones into 33 lots to provide for approximately 460 condominium units , common recreation areas, water well sites and buffer areas on property generally located east of Monterey Avenue and contiguous to the south border of the proposed Monterey Country Club. III . CASE NO. : TT 12202 - SUNRISE CO. IV. CONTENTS: A. Staff Recommendation. B. Draft Resolution/DlFI9X16XAH No. 78-62 . C. Review of major issues discussed by the Planning Commission. (See Planning Commission Minutes of March 28, D. Planning Commission Resolution No. 351 . 1978, and April 18, 1978) . E. Planning Commission Staff Report dated March 28, 1978 F. Portion of Planning Commission minutes dealing with the subject request. G. Related maps and/or exhibits. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - A. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Tentative Map, subject to conditions , by adopting Resolution No. 78-62 . Justification: 1 . The proposed map conforms to both the Subdivision Ordinance of the City of Palm Desert, and the State Map Act. 2. The proposed map is consistent with the City's adopted General Plan and the Palm Desert Zoning Ordinance. 3. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed. 4. The site is physically suited for the proposed density of the development. 5. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or serious health problems. RESOLUTION NO. 78-62 A RESOLUTION OF TIME CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, SETTING FORTH ITS FINDINGS AND APPROVING A TENTATIVE MAP TO ALLOW THE SUBDIVISION OF APPROXIMATELY 155 ACRES TO CREATE 33 LOTS ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED EAST OF IIJONTEREY AVENUE AND CONTIGUOUS TO THE SOUTHERN BOUNDARY OF THE PROPOSED MONTEREY COUNTRY CLUB . WHEREAS , the City Council of the City of Palm Desert , California, did receive a verified application from SUNRISE COMPANY requesting ap- proval of a Tentative Tract Map to divide approximately 155 acres within the PR-4, S .P. (Planned Residential , maximum 4 du/acre , scenic preservation overlay) , PR-6 , S .P . (Planned Residential , maximum 6 du/acre , scenic preservation overlay) and O.S . (Open Space) zones into 33 lots to provide for approximately 460 condominium units , common recreation areas , water well sites , and buffer areas on property generally located east of Monterey Avenue and contiguous to the southern boundary of the proposed Monterey Country Club, and more particularly described as : Portion of South i of Section 8, T5S , R6E, S .B.M. and a portion of North z of Section 17, T5S , R6E, S .B .M. WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Environmental Quality Procedure Resolution No . 78-32, " in that the Director of Environmental Services has determined that the project is exempt from further environmental documentation pursuant to, Section 5(2) of the City of Palm Desert Resolution No. 78-32 as the project lies within the College of. the Desert Area for which an Environmental Impact Report was prepared and the appeal period has ex- pired; and, WHEREAS, the City Council did take into consideration the Tenta- tive Map as submitted, and the reports of the various reviewing agencies ; and, WHEREAS , the City Council did find that the subject Tentative Map does substantially comply with Chapter 26 of the City of Palm Desert Municipal Code , and the State of California Subdivision Map Act, as amended; and, WHEREAS, the City Council did find that the site is physically suited for the proposed density of the development ; and, WHEREAS, the City Council did find that the design of the sub- division and the proposed improvements are not likely to cause sub- stantial environmental damage or serious health problems . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Palm Desert , as follows : 1 . That the above recitations are true and correct and consti- tute the findings of the Council in this case; 2 . That it does hereby require that the applicant pay a fee in an amount determined under the Ordinance provisions in order to comply with Article 26 . 15 of the City ' s Subdivision Ordinance regarding the public facilities requirement ; 3 . That it does hereby approve the above described Tentative Map No. 12202 subject to fulfillment of the attached conditions : RESOLUTION NO. 78-62 Page Two PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the -Palm-Desert--City Council ,— held on- this- day of 1978, by the following vote , to wit : AYES : NOES : ABSENT: ! ABSTAIN: IIC EDWARD D. MULLINS , Mayor ATTEST: SHEILA R. GILLIGAN, City Clerk City of Palm Desert , California RESOLI711ON NO. 78-62 Page Three CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO. TT 12202 Standard Conditions : I. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein which are in addition to all the requirements, limitations , and restrictions of all municipal ordinances and State and Federal Statutes now in force, or which hereafter may be in force. 2. Full public improvements including traffic safety lighting as required by Ordinance and the Director of Public Works , shall be installed in accord- ance with City standards. 3. The C.C. & R' s for this development shall be submitted to the Director of Public Works for review and approval prior to the issuance of any building permits. Prior to recordation of the final subdivision map, the applicant shall submit to the Director of Public Works : a. The document to convey title. b. Covenants and restrictions to be recorded. C. Management and maintenance agreement to be eneted into with the owners of the units of the project. 4. Improvement plans for water and sewer system shall meet the requirements of the respective service districts. 5. Area shall be annexed to appropriate Improvement Districts having juris- diction over the subject area. 6. All dedicated land and/or easements required by this approval shall be �( granted to the City of Palm Desert, without cost to the City and free of all liens and encumbrances. 7. All on-site utilities, including cable TV, shall be placed underground and shall be completely concealed from view except certain appurtenances as may be approved by the Director of Environmental Services. 8. Complete plans and specifications shall be submitted as required by Ordinance to the Director of Public Works for checking and approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. The subdivider shall submit "as-built" plans prior to acceptance of the subdivision improvements by the City. 9. In order to maintain reasonable fire protection during the construction period, the subdivider shall maintain passable vehicular access to all buildings. An adequate number of fire hydrants with required fire flows shall be installed as recommended by the Fire Marshal . 10. All requirements of the City Fire Marshal shall be met as a part of the development of this tract per attached memorandum. 11. Drainage shall be subject to approval of the Director of Public Works. Applicant shall provide engineered data as requested. 12. The total number of lots shall be limited to 33. I � 13. Applicant shall pay fees into the Palm Desert Planned Local Drainage Facilities Fund in an amount to be determined by the provisions of Ordinance No. 175. 14. The applicant shall pay fees pursuant to Article 26.25 of the City's Subdivision Ordinance regarding the public facilities requirement. PLANNING COMh1ISSI0id RESOLUTION N0. 351 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COi•MISSION OF THE CITY OF PALrl _. DESERT,--CALIFORNIA, SETTING-FORT„ -ITS FINDINGS AND RECOMNi NDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF A TENTATIVE MAP TO ALLOW THE SUB- DIVISION OF APPROXIMATELY 155 ACRES TO CREATE 33 LOTS ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED EAST OF MONTEREY AVENUE AND CONTIGUOUS TO THE SOUTHERN BOUNDARY OF THE DESERT SQUIRE COUNTRY CLUB. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California , did receive a verified application from SUNRISE COMPANY requesting approval of a Tentative Tract Map to divide approximately 155 acres within the PR-4, S.P. (Planned Residential , maximum 4 du/acre, scenic preservation overlay) , PR-6, S.P. (Planned Residential , maximum 6 du/acre, scenic preser- vation overlay) and O.S. (open space) zones into 33 lots to provide for approximately 460 condominium units , common recreation areas , water well sites and buffer areas on property generally located east of Monterey Avenue and contiguous to the Southern Boundary of the Desert Squire Country Club, and more particularly described as : Portion of South != of Section 8, T55, R6E, S.B.M. and a portion of North !z of Section 17 , T55 , R6E, S.B.M. WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Environmental Quality Procedure Resolution No. 77-7" , in that the Director of Environmental Services has determined that the project is exempt from further environmental documentation pursuant to Section 5(2) of the City of Palm Desert Resolution No. 77-7 as the project lies within the C.O.D. area for which an EIR was prepared and the appeal period has expired; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did take into consideration the Tentative Map as submitted, and the reports of the various reviewing agencies ; and, 'j WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did find that the subject Tentative Map does substantially comply with Chapter 26 of the City of Palm Desert Municipal Code, and the State of California Subdivision Map Act, as amended; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did find that the site is physically suited for the proposed density of the development; and, WHEREAS, The Planning Commission did find that the design of the sub- division and the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or serious health problems. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the Commission in this case; 2. That it does hereby recommend that the applicant pay a fee in an amount determined under the Ordinance provisions in order to comply with Article 26. 15 of the City's Subdivision Ordinance regarding the public faci- lities requirement; 3. That it does hereby recommend approval to the City Council of the City of Palm Desert of the above described Tentative Map No. 12202 subject to fulfillment of the attached conditions: PLarr:I�+G Dorlr+rssle�l RESOLUTION 'JO. 351 — - Pace Two PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 13th day of April 1973, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: BERKEY , KRYDER, SNYDER NOES: KELLY I� ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE GEORGE BERKEY, Chairman ATTEST: PAUL A. WILLIAMS, Secretary CO,,,.,iSS'' RESOLu7710N 7;0. 3511 Pane CC,IDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE N0. TT 12202 Standard Conditions : 1. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein which are in addition to all the requirements, limitations , and restrictions of all municipal ordinances and State and Federal Statutes now in force, or which hereafter may be in force. 2. Full public improvements including traffic safety lighting as required by Ordinance and the Director of Public Works , shall be installed in accord- ance with City standards. 3. The C.C. & R' s for this development shall be submitted to the Director of Public Works for review and approval prior to the issuance of any building permits. Prior to recordation of the final subdivision map, the applicant shall submit to the Director of Public Works : a. The document to convey title. b. Covenants and restrictions to be recorded. c. Management and maintenance agreement to be eneted into with the owners of the units of the project. 4. Improvement plans for water and sewer system shall meet the requirements of the respective service districts. 5. Area shall be annexed to appropriate Improvement Districts having juris- diction over the subject area. 6. All dedicated land and/or easements required by this approval shall be granted to the City of Palm Desert, without cost to the City and free of all liens and encumbrances. 7. All on-site utilities, including cable TV, shall be placed underground and shall be completely concealed from view except certain appurtenances as may be approved by the Director of Environmental Services. 8. Complete plans and specifications shall be submitted as required by Ordinance to the Director of Public Works for checking and approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. The subdivider shall submit "as-built" plans prior to acceptance of the subdivision improvements by the City. 9. In order to maintain reasonable fire protection during the construction period, the subdivider shall maintain passable vehicular access to all buildings. An adequate number of fire hydrants with required fire flows shall be installed as recommended by the Fire Marshal . 10. All requirements of the City Fire Marshal shall be met as a part of the development of this tract per attached memorandum. 11. Drainage shall be subject to approval of the Director of Public Works. Applicant shall provide engineered data as requested. 12. The total number of lots shall be limited to 33. 13. Applicant shall pay fees into the Palm Desert Planned Local Drainage Facilities Fund in an amount to be determined by the provisions of Ordinance No. 175. 14. The applicant shall pay fees pursuant to Article 26.25 of the City' s Subdivision Ordinance regarding the public facilities requirement. Access rights On }ionter"y snap bL Offered t0 the City as a ded ic'j l On the Final ;.lap, Special Conditions : 1 . Applicant shall make a S8g000 contribution for a future signalization of Monterey Avenue and the entrance to the subdivision. 2. The Palm Desert Flood Control Channel as proposed on the easterly side of this tract does not scale 130 feet. The street alignments and lots shall be modified to reflect a 130 foot right-of-way in this area. 3. The north half of Magnesia Falls Drive shall be dedicated on. the basis of a 55 foot half street and developed with a 16 foot parkway including a 8 foot wide meandering bike path and 32 feet of pavement. i April 18, 1973 ADDENDUM..TO STAFF REPORT FOR _ CASE NO. TT 12202 The City Council discussed potential traffic circulation problems that might result when the Desert Squire project is completed at their last Study Ses- sion. The Council concurred with the Director of Public Works that a con- tribution of $80,000 from the developer toward the future signalization of Monterey Avenue would be in order in lieu of any requirement for the extension of San Pablo Avenue. The attached memorandum to the City Manager from the Director of Public Works indicates the rationale behind the requirement. To incorporate the Council 's determination in the Special Conditions of Approval , Special Condition No. 1 would be revised to read as follows: 1 . Applicant shall make an $80,000 contribution for the future signalization of Monterey Avenue. 1 INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM \ City of Palm Desert TO: The City Manager FROM: Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Tract No. 12202 (Sunrise Company) DATE: March 30th, 1978 The Public Works Department has reassessed its thinking on the con- dition applied to the subject tract regarding the requirement of asking for a donation to the signal fund of the City of Palm Desert. Monterey Street itself is designed to handle approximately 24,000 cars per day. At the present time about 4,000 cars were using this street prior to the washout of the road at the white water wash. Adding an estimated 4,000 cars per day generated by the subject tract we would surmize conservatively about one-third the capacity of the street would be used. Since the layout of the subdivision is such that all the traffic utilizes the one entrance I still believe that it would be fitting that the developer make a contribution to the signal fund of the City of Palm Desert.. Should a signal be installed at the entrances to the Sunrise Subdivisions in all probability Magnesia Falls may not re- quire a signal until some later date. It is my opinion that the traffic generated by this development will play a major and important part in the future signalizati,on of Monterey Avenue and that a contribution of $80,000 would be in order, C"Y OF PAL`4. DESERT" CITY OF PALM DESERT STAFF REPORT To: Planning Commission Report On: Tentative Tract Applicant: SUNRISE COMPANY Case No. : TT 12202 Date: March 28, 1978 I. REQUEST Request for approval of a Tentative Tract Map to divide approximately 155 acres within the PR-4, S.P. and PR-6, S.P. zones into 33 lots to provide for approximately 460 condominium units , common recreation areas , water well sites and buffer areas on property generally located east of Monterey Avenue and contiguous to the south border of the Proposed Desert Squire Country Club. II. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Recommend to the City Council approval of the Tentative Tract subject to the conditions of approval by Planning Commission Resolution No. Justification: 1. The subject Tentative Map does substantially comply with Chapter 26 of the City of Palm Desert Municipal Code, and the State of California Subdivision Map Act, as amended. 2. The subject Tentative Map does comply with the Adopted General Plan and the Palm Desert Zoning Ordinance. 3. The site is physically suited for the type of development proposed. 4. The site is physically suited for the proposed density of the development. 5. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or serious health problems. III. BACKGROUND: A. Tract Size: Approximately 155 acres B. Proposed Lots : 1-17 Residential 18-24 Recreational 25-26 Water Well Sites 27-33 Buffer Areas C. Zoning: PR-4, S.P. , O.S. , PR-6, S.P. D. Adjacent Zoning: North - PR-5 South - P East - PR-4, S.P,. West - City of Rancho Mirage E. Envir-c-mental Find'ng: The project is exempt from further envir- onmental documentation pursuant to Section 5(2) of the City of Palm Desert Resolution No. 77-7 as the project lies within the C.O. D. area for which an EIR was prepared and the appeal period has expired. Telephone - General Telephone Natural Gas - Southern California Gas Co. Water - C.V.C.W.D. Sewer - C.V.C.W.D. Sanitary Sewers . III Case No. TT '12202 March 20-.. 1973 Faae Two IV. DISCUSSION : The special Conditions of Approval requires that the applicant make a contribution for a future signal at Lot G with the intersection of Monterey. Special Condi,tion No. 4 requires the improvement of Magnesia Falls Drive either at time of construction of the tract or at some time in the future. The Commission may want to give consideration to this for traffic safety purposes. Special Condition No. 3 is being required because the submitted tract map has not been drawn to scale. Slinutes Palm Desert Planning Commission March 28 , 1978 Page Secen VI . PUBLIC HEARINGS (Cont . ) E. Case Nos . DP 04-78 and 11,1MF, SUNRISE COMPANY , Applicant Consideration of a request for approval of a Develop- ment Plan and Preliminary Design Review to provide for approximately 460 condominium units , a nine hole golf course , twelve swimming pools and accompanying therapy pools on approximately 155 acres within the PR-4 , S .P . and PR-6 , S .P. zones as an extension of the previously approved 780 units , 18-hole golf and tennis club development known as Desert Squire Country Club . Mr . Williams reviewed the case noting that there would be a maximum of 41 tennis courts. He reviewed the Conditions of Ap- proval and noted the Design Review Board condition . Chairman Berkev declared the Public Hearing opened and asked if the applicant wished to speak at this time . JACK CONLON, representing Sunrise Company, 42 , 000 Bob Hope Drive , addressed the Commission and noted his agreement with the Conditions . Chairman Berkey asked if anyone wished to speak in FAVOR or in OPPOSITION to the proposed project . Being none , he declared the Public Hearing closed 'and asked the pleasure of the Commission . Commissioner Kelly asked why the traffic situation was not discussed in the staff report and asked if it should be discussed now or during the Tentative Tract . Mr. Williams stated that if the Com- missioners had any reservations they should be noted at this time . Commissioner Kelly went on to say that there is already a traffic problem and even if Monterey is reconstructed it will not alleviate the entire problem as this new development will create more traffic . Further she noted here reservations with regard to the access pro- blems also. Commissioner Reading asked if anything was going to be built in the Whitewater Wash. Mr. Williams replied that the golf course would be in the wash. There was some discussion about the pace for development of the project and the problem with having the golf course in the wash. On a motion by Commissioner Snyder , seconded by Commissioner Kryder, the Commission approved the case by Planning Commission Re- solution No. 348; carried unanimously ( 5-0) . F. Case No. TT 12202 , SUNRISE COMPANY, Applicant Consideration of a request for approval of a Tentative Tract Map to divide approximately 155 acres within the PR-4, S .P. and PR-6 , S .P . zones into 33 lots to provide for approximately 460 condominium units , common recrea- tion areas , water well sites and buffer areas on pro- perty generally located east of Monterey Avenue and con- tiguous to the south border of the proposed Desert Squire Country Club . Mr. Williams reviewed the case and the conditions noting that the applicant would improve I of Magnesia Falls and improve the median strip . Rancho ',lirage has asked that a signal light be put in on the corner of, Clancy Lane and Monterey. Minutes Palm Desert Planning Commission March 28 , 1978 Page Eiht IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS (Coat . ) F. Case No . TT 12202 (Cont . ) There was some discussion with regard to access problems onto Monterey and perhaps the extension of San Pablo would relieve some of the problem. Mr . Williams stated that the extension of Magnesia Falls would help . Chairman Berkey stated that the exten- sion of both Magnesia Falls and San Pablo would be very helpful . Commissioner Kelly stated that extending San Pablo is a good idea but that it won ' t solve the problem as traffic in the area is al- ready a problem. She further stated that the area is used by entire valley. In conclusion she could not vote in favor of the project as traffic is already a problem and that any more growth in the area would only create worse problems . At this time Commissioner Kelly stated that the felt the case should be continued until a traffic study can be made . Chairman Berkey asked what the legal time limits were. Mr . Williams stated that it is 50 days from time of date of filing which would make April 24th the maximum time limit . Chair- man Berkey stated that he would also like to see a traffic study done which might also show some alternatives. Commissioner Kelly noted that perhaps an effort might be made by Rancho Mirage to help solve the problem. Mr . Williams stated that the case could be continued to the April 18th meeting for further discussion on the issues of concern. Mr. Conlon stated that traffic and other concerns have already been covered in the General Plan and the project is in a zone with less density which would create less traffic and there is no more information available . He also noted that 850 of the buyers are weekend residents . Commissioner Kelly stated that the trend is changing and that people are staying year round and that Monterey has been a problem and will continue to be a problem with regard to traffic and access- ibility to the area in time of floods . Mr . Williams noted that under the COD Area Specific Plan Magnesia Falls is proposed to be extended to Monterey which will be widened to 6 lanes from Highway 111 to Interstate 10. Commissioner Snyder stated that traffic is a problem throughout the valley and that this project cannot be saddled with the problems of the valley. Air. Conlon stated that they will do Magnesia Falls but doesn ' t feel that they should be burdened with San Pablo . There was some further discussion regarding the fact that this could be discussed during a joint meeting with the City Council and perhaps having developers contribute to streets just as they do with street lights. Chairman Berkey indicated that the Planning Commission is not firm on the policy and they are concerned with whether not to approve projects until the City finds funds to improve the roads or ask the developer to improve the roads . On a motion by Commissioner Snyder and seconded by Commissioner Kelly the case was continued to the April 18th meeting; carried unanimously (5-0) . VII . OLD BUSINESS - None VIII . NEW BUSINESS - None L IX. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ITEMS their meeting of ,March 21 , 1978 . Miautes Palm Desert Plannin;; C()'=ission April 18, 1978 P1yn T.,o VII . OLD BUSINESS - None VIII . NEW BUSINESS A. A resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert , California, suspending Planning Com- mission Resolution No . 346 which approved a Conditional Use Permit to construct and operate a church-related i retirement center for elderly clergy , until a deter- mination is made by the Planning Commission as to the appropriateness of a Change of Zone from R-1-9 , 000 to PR-5. Mr . Williams noted that the City Attorney had advised that a change of zone was needed due to a misconception of the project when it was originally presented. There was some discussion as to whether to revoke the approval totally and have the applicant start again or to use the approval for the new development plan after rezoning . On a motion by Commissioner Snyder, seconded by Commissioner Kryder, the Commission revoked Planning Commission Resolution No . 346, which approved a Conditional Use Permit to construct and operate a church-related retirement center for elderly clergy by Planning Commission Resolution No . 350 ; carried unanimously (4-0) . The Re- solution was changed to read as above. I . PUBLIC HEARINGS (Cont . ) A. Continued Case No. TT 12202 , Sunrise Company, Applicant Consideration of a request for approval of a Tentative Tract Map to divide approximately 155 acres within the PR-4 , S .P . and PR-6 , S.P . zones into 33 lots to provide for approximately 460 condominium units , common recrea- tion areas , water well sites and buffer areas on property generally located east of Monterey Avenue and contiguous to the south border of the proposed Desert Squire Country Club. Mr. Williams reviewed the case and noted that the Director of Public Works had provided some additional input and would address the Commission at this time . Mr . Beebe indicated that no traffic study had been made , but assumptions had been made on the daily traffic count on Monterev. As stated in the Addendum to the Staff Report he recommended the revision of Special Conditon No. 1 asking for an $80, 000 contribu- tion towards the future signalization of Monterey Avenue . Chairman Berkey noted that the Commissions concern was the traffic on Monterey and Mrs Beebe ' s concern is the safety of Monterey being controlled by a traffic signal on Monterey . Mr. Beebe further stated he is going to the City Council to get a -contract awarded to have Monterey improved on the east side from Parkview to 1 , 300 ft . northerly of Clancy Lane . He also noted that the improvements should coincide with the completion c ' the development . There was some further discussion about the real problem being - -- - - - - -= anu south would be extended. It was noted that Portola was to be extended toCountry Club in the near future and funds will be required of another developer for the signalizat '_^, o ` Country Clu -� iinutes Palm Desert Plannin Cor,:,issiun April 18 . 1978 Page Three VI . PUBLIC I EARIN;GS (Cont . ) A. Continued Case No . TT 12202 (Cunt . ) Other points brought up were that Projects are not looked at with regard to timing of completion of public facilities to handle the additional Population ; the Possible extension of Monterey to Frank Sinatra ; extension of `fagnesia Falls to Portola ; ;Iont;erey l signal will be in within 2 years ; and the traffic flo%v is still the main concern of the Commission . Chairman Berkey declared the Public Hearing open and asked if the applicant wished to speak at this time . Jack Conlon , representing Sunrise Co . , addressed the Commission indicating that he is not interested in contributing to improving San Pablo or the sig- nalization of Monterey , but will contribute if the signal will be at the entrance to both his projects on Monterey. Mr. Conlon also added that the market is still strong and he forsees no pro- blem in the project being completed on schedule if not before . Chairman Berkey asked if there was anyone wishing to speak in FAVOR or in OPPOSITION to the project . Being none , he declared the Public Hearing closed and asked for the pleasure of the Commission . Chairman Berkey asked that the Special Condition No . 1 be more elaborately spelled out to include the location of the signal':`,, Mr. Beebe stated that he would like to leave the condition open ;Hut would not object to the location being stated. Special Condition ,'T�. No. 1 was revised to read : Applicant shall make an $80, 000 contra.' but ion for the future signalization of Monterey Avenue and the entrance to the subdivision . On a motion by Commissioner Snyder, seconded by Commissioner Kryder , the case was approved by Planning Commission Resolution No . 351 ; carried 3-1 (AYES : Berkey , Kryder , Snyder ; NOES : Kelly).. . VIII . NEW BUSINESS (Cont . ) B. County Referral PbI 11695 , JAY C. BEESEMIER, Et Al , Applicant Request for approval of a Parcel Map in the Pinyon Crest area. Mr . Cipriani reviewed the case and noted that it is not clear as to what they are doing and that staff is recommending no comment . C. County Referral TT 11969, CLARENCE ENRIGHT, Applicant Request for approval of a Tentative Tract to create 80 single-family residential lots within the R-1-9 , 000 zone on property located north of 44th Avenue and east of Shadow Lane extended . i Mr . Cipriani noted that this project is near Indian Wells and he referred to the Staff Report noting the recommendations of the Staff . The Commission asked that the following comments be added to the staff comments : 4 . Street F should have no access onto 44th Avenue ; it should have a cul-de-sac as Streets C through E ; 5 . A 2 way stop sign should be provided at 44th Avenue and Shadow Lane extended ; 6 . Increase lot size to 12, 000 sq . ft , to correspond .with On a motion by Commissioner Snyder , seconded by Commissioner Kelly, the Commission directed the Secretary to forward the above comments on both cases to the Riverside County s Planning teen carried unanir::eusl y- (4-0) . INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM City of Palm Desert TO: Planning Commission FROM: Director of Public :forks SUBJECT: Tentative Tract 12202 DATE: March 15, 1978 1. Lot C. designated as street, and Lot D, designated as street, are not in conformance with the ordinance of being 600 feet or less in length. Lot D, and Lot E create a 4-way intersection that the City tries to discourage. If a relocation of this intersection by alternating Lot D and Lot E onto Lot G street can be accomplished. 2 Magnesia Falls Drive shall be fully improved providing the development to the south is not contemplated at this time. A possibility exists as to bonding for Magnesia Falls should this be advantageous for development and constructed at a later date. 3. The Palm Desert Flood Control Channel as proposed on the easterly side of this tract does not scale 130 feet. The map and street alinements and lots should be readjusted to reflect a 130 foot right-of-way in this area. 4. This tract shall make a contribution for a future signal at Lot G with the intersection of Monterey Road. 5. This tract shall pay the required drainage and park fees as required by the City of Palm Desert Ordinances. 6. All curbs and gutters shall be in conformance with the City of Palm Desert Standard Plan R-1. R.W.RIDDELL 3700 CENTRAL AVENUE • RIVERSIDE. CALIFORNIA Eastern Division Distribution Planning Supervisor Mailing Address P.O. BOX 2200, RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92516 March 15, 1973 Location of Nearest Gas Main: Monterey Ave. N/0 Park View Dr. City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, CA, 92260 Re: TT 12202 - Sunrise Co This letter is not to be interpreted as a contractual commitment to serve the proposed project; but only as an information service. Its intent is to notify you that the Southern California Gas Company has facilities in the area where the above named project is proposed. Gas service to the project could be provided from an existing main without any significant impact on the environment. The service would be in accordance with the Company's policies and extension rules on file with the California Public Utilities Commission at the time contractual arrangements are made. The availability of natural gas service, as set fortis in this letter, is based upon present conditions of gas supply and regulatory policies. As a public utility, the Southern California Gas Company is under the jurisdiction of the California Public Utilities Commission. We can also be affected by actions of federal regulatory agencies. Should these agencies take any action which affects gas supply or the condition under which service is available, gas service will be provided in accordance with revised conditions. We have developed several programs which are available, upon request, to provide assistance in selecting the most effective applications of energy conservation techniques for a particular project. If you desire further information on any of our energy conservation programs , please contact this office for assistance. ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES / CITY OF PALM DESERT March 14, 1978 Paul A. Williams Director of Environmental Services City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 Reference: Tentative Tract No. 12202 Provide the following fire protection: 1 . Install a water system capable of delivering 2500 GPM fire flow from any fire hydrant for a two hour duration in addition to domestic supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement. 2. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants located at each street intersection (a) but not greater than 500 feet apart in any direction. A. Exterior surface of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow, and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. B. Curbs shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. 3. Prior to recordation of the final map, the developer shall furnish the original and three (3) copies of the water system plan to the Fire Marshal for review. 4. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and approved by the water company, with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system in Tract No• TT 12202 is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Fire Marshal . " Upon approval , the original plan will be returned to the developer. Very truly yours , David L. Flake Fire Chief Bud Engel Fire Marshal I ml.j Cl of RANCHO MIRAGE v j F, 69_825 HIGHWAY III RANCHON11R-AGE CALIFORNIA 92270 TELEPHONE (714) 3288871 March 17, 1978 Mr. Paul A. Williams Director of Environmental Services City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, California 92260 Dear Paul : The City Council , at their meeting of March 16, reviewed as completely as possible considering the time restraint in returning recommendations to you by March 17, the Sunrise Company, Tentative Tract Map ;#TT 12202. Comments and recommendations are as follows. 1 . Require the developer to install a signal at Monterey and Clancy Lane which would be serving their main entrance. 2. Clancy Lane has been vacated by Rancho Mirage at a point between the substation and the school . This, in effect, would preclude traffic leaving the project to use Clancy Lane for travel to Bob Hope Drive. Therefore, the only means to enter Palm Desert in the event Monterey is closed at the wash would be north on .Monterey to Country .Club and then either to Cook Street or Bob Hope Bridge. 3. Due to the fact that Sunrise Corporation is approaching completion of Las Palmas and proceeding with the subject tract in Palm Desert, the Council felt that an additional time period should be given for input by Rancho Mirage especially in regard to participation in redoing Monterey, the matter of full curbs and gutters and for participation in the under- grounding of power lines. If you have any questions, I would be glad to attend your Land Division Committee meeting on March 22. Please advise. Cordially, William J. Probert City Manager cc: uMayor Ed Mullins i 't City Council ENVIRONMENTAL SEnvICES CITY OF PALM CESERT �OUNr� SS ESTA811SHED IN 1918 AS A PUBLIC AL.-Y - _ �1S TYR ICT COACHELLA VALLEY COUNTY WATER DISTRICT POST OFFICE BOX 1058 COACHELLA, CALIFORNIA 92236 • TELEPHONE (714) 398-2651 DIRECTCpS RAYMOND R, RUMMONCS, PREK10Eni GFFl CER1 LOWFLL O. WEERS, GD6pAl Fn .n GFP-pl(F pin mlp TELLI$CCDEKAS, VICE PNESIDFVi C l F. 3$ CLF )'N C0.CLAN D, ';CCSfin PY 'EVE U GA0.0NEP I/n LTFF R, '.4'51GXT, null lnu STfYE O.[IV%TGN March 22, 1973 REO\Y V:E A50 SYFRR ILL, nl i,]p q[s• File: 0163. 11 0421 . 1 0721 . 1 Department of Environmental Services City of Palm Desert P. 0. Box 1977 . Palm Desert , California 92260 Re: Tract 12202 Seca 8 & 17, T5S, RISE Gentlemen: This area is protected from stormwater flows by the Whitewater River Storm- water Channel and may be considered safe from stormwater flows except in rare instances. The District will furnish domestic water and sanitation service to said area in accordance with the currently prevailing regulations of this District. This area shall be annexed to Improvement District Nos . 16 & 70 of the Coachella Valley County Water District for domestic water service. This area shall be annexed to Improvement District Nos . 53, 54 & 80 of the Coachella Valley County Water District for sanitation service. The District will need additional facilities to provide for the orderly expansion of its domestic water system. These facilities may include wells , reservoirs and booster pumping stations. The developer will be required to provide land on which some of these facilities will be located. These sites shall be down on the tract map as lots to be deeded to the District for such purpose. Very truly yours , % LoT'1e�l 0. Weeps/ General Manager-Chief Engineer KEH:vh cc: Riverside County Dept. of Public Health 46-20 Oasis Sc . s Y y(% ?'" t Indio, CA 92201 h '� li l• :i\ 7 . �.�7i P.1U4 DESERT TO: Mr. Paul A. Williams, Director of Environmental Services City of Palm D eser't FROM: Lloyd W. Rogers, R.S. , Supervising Sanitarian Riverside County health Department — Desert District DATE: March 16, 1978 SUBJECT: TT 12202 Due to the fact that TT 12202 is provided with sewage disposal by a sanitary sewage disposal system and water is provided by an approved domestic water sunn_ lv_ , we have no comments at this time. J ENVIRGrVAENTAL SERVICES CITY OF PAU.1 DESERT � . .. T iaZ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 351 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM - DESERT-,-CALIFORNIA-, SETTING FORTH- I-TS F-INDINGS AND RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF A TENTATIVE MAP TO ALLOW THE SUB- DIVISION OF APPROXIMATELY 155 ACRES TO CREATE 33 LOTS ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED EAST OF MONTEREY AVENUE AND CONTIGUOUS TO THE SOUTHERN BOUNDARY OF THE DESERT SQUIRE COUNTRY CLUB. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did receive a verified application from SUNRISE COMPANY requesting I)l approval of a Tentative Tract Map to divide approximately 155 acres within the PR-4, S.P. (Planned Residential , maximum 4 du/acre, scenic preservation overlay) , PR-6, S.P. (Planned Residential , maximum 6 du/acre, scenic preser- vation overlay) and O.S. (open space) zones into 33 lots to provide for approximately 460 condominium units, common recreation areas , water well sites and buffer areas on property generally located east of Monterey Avenue and contiguous to the Southern Boundary of the Desert Squire Country Club, and more particularly described as: Portion of South z of Section 8, T55, R6E, S.B.M. and a portion of North ? of Section 17, T55, R6E, S.B.M. WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Environmental Quality Procedure Resolution No. 77-7" , in that the Director of Environmental Services has determined that the project is exempt from further environmental documentation pursuant to Section 5(2) of the City of Palm Desert Resolution No. 77-7 as the project lies within the C.O.D. area for which an EIR was prepared and the appeal period has expired; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did take into consideration the Tentative Map as submitted, and the reports of the various reviewing agencies; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did find that the subject Tentative Map does substantially comply with Chapter 26 of the City of Palm Desert Municipal Code, and the State of California Subdivision Map Act, as amended; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did find that the site is physically suited for the proposed density of the development; and, WHEREAS, The Planning Commission did find that the design of the sub- division and the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or serious health problems. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the Commission in this case; 2. That it does hereby recommend that the applicant pay a fee in an amount determined under the Ordinance provisions in order to comply with Article 26. 15 of the City's Subdivision Ordinance regarding the public faci- lities requirement; 3. That it does hereby recommend approval to the City Council of the City of Palm Desert of the above described Tentative Map No. 12202 subject to fulfillment of the attached conditions: l-- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 351 Page Two PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 18th day of April 1978, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: BERKEY, KRYDER, SNYDER NOES: KELLY ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE GEORGE BERKEY, Chairman ATTEST: PAUL A. WILLIAMS, Secretary r , MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY - APRIL 18, 1978 7 : 00 PM - CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS I . CALL TO ORDER The specially scheduled meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission was called to order by Chairman Berkey at 7 : 00 p .m. in the Council Chambers of the Palm Desert City Hall . II . PLEDGE - Commissioner Kryder III . ROLL CALL Present : Commissioner KELLY Commissioner KRYDER Commissioner SNYDER Chairman BERKEY Others Present : Paul A. Williams - Director of Environmental Services Ralph Cipriani - Associate Planner Clyde Beebe - Director of Public Works Kathy Shorey - Planning Secretary IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. MINUTES of the regular meeting of the Planning Commission of March 28, 1978 . i Chairman Berkey and Commissioher Kelly requested that the l following corrections be made to the minutes . P ge two, middle of first paragraph change "40 ft . side C,,)Yard setbacks" to "40 ft . rear yard setbacks" . Jte e five, 3rd paragraph, change "Pete Battia" to "Pete attio" ; 7th paragraph, 2nd sentence after flat roof or add: 'if the adjacent property owners had responded to r the proposed uses" . On a motion by Commissioner Kelly, seconded by Commissioner Snyder , the minutes were approved as corrected; carried unanimously (4-0) . V. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS A. Letter received from Mr . Gil Brault regarding the request `` David Fuller for approval of a Variance for the Seibu t;o ! Apartments sign. "Commissioner Kryder noted that he had heard the Mr . Fuller was in the process of the selling the apartments involved . The Commission advised the Secretary to forward the letter to the City Council for consideration with the Variance . VI . PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Continued Case o. TT 12202, 'unrise Company , Applicant Mr. Williams state that t-h applicant was not present and asked that the Commission review this case a little later in the agenda. Minutes Palm Desert Planning Commission April 18, 1978 Page Two VII . OLD BUSINESS - None VIII . NEW BUSINESS A. A resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert , California, suspending Planning Com- mission Resolution No . 346 which approved a Conditional Use Permit to construct and operate a church-related retirement center for elderly clergy, until a deter- mination is made by the Planning Commission as to the appropriateness of a Change of Zone from R-1-9 , 000 to PR-5. Mr. Williams noted that the City Attorney had advised that a change of zone was needed due to a misconception of the project when it was originally presented. There was some discussion as to whether to revoke the approval totally and have the applicant start again or to use the approval for the new development plan after rezoning. On a motion by Commissioner Snyder, seconded by Commissioner Kryder, the Commission revoked Planning Commission Resolution No . 346, which approved a Conditional Use Permit to construct and operate a church-related retirement center for elderly clergy by Planning Commission Resolution No . 350 ; carried unanimously (4-0) . The Re- solution was changed to read as above . VI . PUBLIC HEARINGS (Cont. ) A. Continued Case No. TT 12202 , Sunrise Company, Applicant �.. Consideration of a request for approval of a Tentative Tract Map to divide approximately 155 acres within the PR-4, S .P . and PR-6, S .P. zones into 33 lots to provide for approximately 460 condominium units , common recrea- tion areas, water well sites and buffer areas on property generally located east of Monterey Avenue and contiguous to the south border of the proposed Desert Squire Country Club. Mr . -Williams reviewed the case and noted that the Director of Public Works had provided some additional input and would address the Commission at this time. Mr. Beebe indicated that no traffic study had been made, but assumptions had been made on the daily traffic count on Monterey. As stated in the Addendum to the Staff Report he recommended the revision of Special Conditon No. 1 asking for an $80, 000 contribu- tion towards the future signalization of Monterey Avenue . Chairman Berkey noted that the Commissions concern was the traffic on Monterey and Mr . Beebe 's concern is the safety of Monterey being controlled by a traffic signal on Monterey . Mr. Beebe further stated he is going to the City Council to get a 'contract awarded to have Monterey improved on the east side from Parkview to 1 , 300 ft . northerly of Clancy Lane . He also noted that the improvements should coincide with the completion of the development . There was some further discussion about the real problem being traffic flow not the control of it and whether some of the other streets running north and south would be extended. It was noted that Portola was to be extended to Country Club in the near future and funds will be required of another developer for the signalization of Country Club and Monterey. Minutes Palm Desert Planning Commission April 18 , 1978 Page Three VI . PUBLIC HEARINGS (Cont . ) A. Continued Case No. TT 12202 (Cont . ) Other points brought up were that projects are not looked at with regard to timing of completion of public facilities to handle the additional population; the possible extension of Monterey to Frank Sinatra; extension of Magnesia Falls to Portola; Monterey & 44th Avenue signal will be in within 2 years ; and the traffic flow is still the main concern of the Commission . Chairman Berkey declared the Public Hearing open and asked if the applicant wished to speak at this time . Jack Conlon, representing Sunrise Co . , addressed the Commission indicating that he is not interested in contributing to improving San Pablo or the sig- nalization of Monterey , but will contribute if the signal will be at the entrance to both his projects on Monterey. Mr. Conlon also added that the market is still strong and he forsees no pro- blem in the project being completed on schedule if not before . Chairman Berkey asked if there was anyone wishing to speak in FAVOR or in OPPOSITION to the project . Being none , he declared the <<� Public Hearing closed and asked for the pleasure of the Commission. Chairman Berkey asked that the Special Condition No. 1 be more elaborately spelled out to include the location of the signal=�\ c l Mr. Beebe stated that he would like to leave the condition open'ZZ Oil, would not object to the location being stated. Special Condition '' No. l was revised to read : Applicant shall make an $80, 000 contriX bution for the future signalization of Monterey Avenue and the entrance to the subdivision . On a motion by Commissioner Snyder, seconded by Commissioner Kryder, the case was approved by Planning Commission Resolution No. 351 ; carried 3-1 (AYES: Berkey, Kryder , Snyder ; NOES : Kelly) . VIII . NEW BUSINESS (Cont . ) B. County Referral PM 11695, JAY C. BEESEMIER, Et Al , Applicant Request for approval of a Parcel Map in the Pinyon Crest area. Mr . Cipriani reviewed the case and noted that it is not clear as to what they are doing and that staff is recommending no comment . C. County Referral TT 11969, CLARENCE ENRIGHT, Applicant Request for approval of a Tentative Tract to create 80 single-family residential lots within the R-1-9 , 000 zone on property located north of 44th Avenue and east of Shadow Lane extended. Mr . Cipriani noted that this project is near Indian Wells and he referred to the Staff Report noting the recommendations of the Staff . The Commission asked that the following comments be added to the staff comments : 4. Street F should have no access onto 44th Avenue ; it should have a cul-de-sac as Streets C through E; 5 . A 2 way stop sign should be provided at 44th Avenue and Shadow Lane extended; 6. Increase lot size to 12, 000 sq. ft . to correspond with potential development across the street . On a motion by Commissioner Snyder, seconded by Commissioner Kelly, the Commission directed the Secretary to forward the above comments on both cases to the Riverside County Planning Department ; carried unanimously (4-0) . April 18, 1978 ADwDENDUM TO STAFF REPORT FOR CASE NO. TT 12202 The City Council discussed potential traffic circulation problems that might result when the Desert Squire project is completed at their last Study Ses- sion. The Council concurred with the Director of Public Works that a con- tribution of $80,000 from the developer toward the future signalization of Monterey Avenue would be in order in lieu of any requirement for the extension of San Pablo Avenue. The- at-tached memorandum to the City Manager from the Director of Public Works tiidcatgslthe rationale behind the requirement. To incorporate the Council 's determination in the Special Conditions of Approval , Special Condition No. 1 would be revised to read as follows : 1 . Applicant shall make an $80.,000 contribution for the future signalization of Monterey Avenue. INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM City of Palm Desert TO: The City Manager FROM: Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Tract No. 12202 (Sunrise Company) DATE: March 30th, 1978 The Public Works Department has reassessed its thinking on the con- dition applied to the subject tract regarding the requirement of asking for a donation to the signal fund of the City of Palm Desert. Monterey Street itself is designed to handle approximately 24,000 . cars per day. At the present time about 4,000 cars were using this street prior to the washout of the road at the white water wash. Adding an estimated 4,000 cars per day generated by the subject tract we would surmize conservatively about one-third the capacity of the street would be used. Since the layout of the subdivision is such that all the traffic utilizes the one entrance 1 still believe that it would be fitting that the developer make a contribution to the signal fund of the City of Palm Desert, Should a signal be installed at the entrances to the Sunrise Subdivisions in all probability Magnesia Falls may not re- quire a signal until some later date. It is my opinion that the traffic generated by this development will play a major and important part in the future si.gnalization of Monterey Avenue and that a contribution of $80,000 would be in order. RECEIVED MAR 3 0 1913 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CITY OF PALM DESERT. CITY OF PALM DESERT STAFF REPORT To: Planning Commission Report On: Tentative Tract Applicant: SUNRISE COMPANY Case No. : TT 12202 Date: March 28, 1978 - r ' I . REQUEST: Request for approval of a Tentative Tract Map to divide approximately 155 acres within the PR-4, S.P. and PR-6, S.P. zones into 33 lots to provide for approximately 460 condominium units, common recreation areas, water well sites and buffer areas on property generally located east of Monterey Avenue and contiguous to the south border of the Proposed Desert Squire Country Club. II . STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Recommend to the City Council approval of the Tentative Tract subject to the conditions of approval by Planning Commission Resolution No. Justification: 1. The subject Tentative Map does substantially comply with Chapter 26 of the City of Palm Desert Municipal Code, and the State of California Subdivision Map Act, as amended. 2. The subject Tentative Map does comply with the Adopted General Plan and the Palm Desert Zoning Ordinance. 3. The site is physically. suited for the type of development proposed. l 4. The site is physically suited for the proposed density of the ,_- development. 5. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or serious health problems. III . BACKGROUND: A. Tract Size: Approximately 155 acres B. Proposed Lots: 1-17 Residential 18-24 Recreational 25-26 Water Well Sites 27-33 Buffer Areas C. Zoning: PR-4, S.P. , O.S. , PR-6, S.P. D. Adjacent Zoning: North - PR-5 South - P East - PR-4, S.P. West - City of Rancho Mirage E. Environmental Finding: The project is exempt from further envir- onmental documentation pursuant to Section 5(2) of the City of Palm Desert Resolution No. 77-7 as the project lies within the C.O.D. area for which an EIR was prepared and the appeal period has expired. F. Utilities : Power - Southern California Edison , Telephone - General Telephone Natural Gas - Southern California Gas Co. Water - C.V.C.W.D. Sewer - C.V.C.W.D. Sanitary Sewers Case No. TT 12202 March 28, 1978 Page Two IV. DISCUSSION: The special Conditions of Approval requires that the applicant make a contribution for a future signal at Lot G with the intersection of Monterey. Special Condition No. 4 requires the improvement of Magnesia Falls Drive either at time of construction of the tract or at some time ;} in the future. The Commission may want to give consideration to this ! for traffic safety purposes. Special Condition No. 3 is being required because the submitted tract map has not been drawn to scale. I t . 3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 351 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, SETTING FORTH ITS FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF A TENTATIVE MAP TO ALLOW THE SUB- DIVISION OF APPROXIMATELY 155 ACRES TO CREATE 33 LOTS ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED EAST OF MONTEREY AVENUE AND CONTIGUOUS TO THE SOUTHERN BOUNDARY OF THE DESERT SQUIRE COUNTRY CLUB. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did receive a verified application from Silver Spur Associates requesting approval of a Tentative Tract Map to divide approximately 155 acres within the PR-4, S.P. (Planned Residential , maximum 4 du/acre, scenic preservation overlay) , PR-6, S.P. (Planned Residential , maximum 6 du/acre, scenic preser- vation overlay) and O.S. (open space) zones into 33 lots to provide for approximately 460 condominium units, common recreation areas , water well sites and buffer areas. on property generally located east of Monterey Avenue and contiguous to the Southern Boundary of the Desert Squire Country Club, and more particularly described as: Portion of South %2 of Section 8, T55, R6E, S.B.M. and a portion of North z of Section 17, T55, R6E, S.B.M. WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Environmental Quality Procedure Resolution No. 77-7" , in that the Director of Environmental Services has determined that the project is exempt from further environmental documentation pursuant to Section 5(2) of the City of Palm Desert Resolution No. 77-7 as the project lies within the C.O.D. area for which an EIR was prepared and the appeal period has expired; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did take into consideration the Tentative Map as submitted, and the reports of the various reviewing agencies; and, ' WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did find that the subject Tentative Map j does substantially comply with Chapter 26 of the City of Palm Desert Municipal L Code, and the State of California Subdivision Map Act, as amended; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did find that the site is physically suited for the proposed density of the development; and, WHEREAS, The Planning Commission did find that the design of the sub- division and the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or serious health problems. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, as follows : 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the Commission in this case; 2. That it does hereby recommend that the applicant pay a fee in an amount determined under the Ordinance provisions in order to comply with Article 26. 15 of the City's Subdivision Ordinance regarding the public faci- lities requirement; 3. That it does hereby recommend approval to the City Council of the City of Palm Desert of the above described Tentative Map No. 12202 subject to fulfillment of the attached conditions: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 351 Page Two PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at. a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 18th day of April 1978, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: BERKEY, KRYDER, SNYDER NOES: KELLY ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE GEORGE BERKEY, Chairman ATTEST: PAUL A. WILLIAMS, Secretary PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 351 — Page Three CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO. TT 12202 Standard Conditions : 1. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein which are in addition to all the requirements, limitations, and restrictions of all municipal ordinances and State and Federal Statutes now in force, or which hereafter may be in force. 2. Full public improvements including traffic safety lighting as required by Ordinance and the Director of Public Works, shall be installed in accord- ance with City standards. 3. The C.C. & R' s for this development shall be submitted to the Director of Public Works for review and approval prior to the issuance of any building permits. Prior to recordation of the final subdivision map, the applicant shall submit to the Director of Public Works: a. The document to convey title. b. Covenants and restrictions to be recorded. c. Management and maintenance agreement to be eneted into with the owners of the units of the project. 4. Improvement plans for water and sewer system shall meet the requirements of the respective service districts. 5. Area shall be annexed to appropriate Improvement Districts having juris- diction over the subject area. 6. All dedicated land and/or easements required by this approval shall be granted to the City of Palm Desert, without cost to the City and free of all liens and encumbrances. 7. All on-site utilities, including cable TV, shall be placed underground and shall be completely concealed from view except certain appurtenances as may be approved by the Director of Environmental Services. 8. Complete plans and specifications shall be submitted as required by Ordinance to the Director of Public Works for checking and approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. The subdivider shall submit "as-built" plans prior to acceptance of the subdivision improvements by the City. 9. In order to maintain reasonable fire protection during the construction period, the subdivider shall maintain passable vehicular access to all buildings. An adequate number of fire hydrants with required fire flows shall be installed as recommended by the Fire Marshal . 10. All requirements of the City Fire Marshal shall be met as a part of the development of this tract per attached memorandum. 11. Drainage shall be subject to approval of the Director of Public Works. Applicant shall provide engineered data as requested. 12. The total number of lots shall be limited to 33. 13. Applicant shall pay fees into the Palm Desert Planned Local Drainage Facilities Fund in an amount to be determined by the provisions of Ordinance No. 175. 14. The applicant shall pay fees pursuant to Article 26.25 of the City' s Subdivision Ordinance regarding the public facilities requirement. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 351 Page Four 15. Access rights on Monterey shall be offered to the City as a dedication on the Final Map. Special Conditions: 1 . Applicant shall make a $8Q000 contribution for a future signalization of Monterey Avenue and the entrance to the subdivision. 2. The Palm Desert Flood Control Channel as proposed on the easterly side of this tract does not scale 130 feet. The street alignments and lots shall be modified to reflect a 130 foot right-of-way in this area. 3• The north half of Magnesia Falls Drive shall be dedicated on the basis of a 55 foot half street and developed with a 16 foot parkway including a 8 foot wide meandering bike path and 32 feet of pavement. 1 INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM City of Palm Desert TO: Planning Commission FROM: Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Tentative Tract 12202 DATE: March 15, 1978 1. Lot C. designated as street, and Lot D, designated as street, are not in conformance with the ordinance of being 600 feet or less in length. Lot D, and Lot E create a 4-way intersection that the City tries to discourage. If a relocation of this intersection by alternating Lot D and Lot E onto Lot G street can be accomplished. 2 Magnesia Falls Drive shall be fully improved providing the development to the south is not contemplated at this time. A possibility exists as to bonding for Magnesia Falls should this be advantageous for development and constructed at a later date. 3. The Palm Desert Flood Control Channel as proposed on the easterly side of this tract does not scale 130 feet. The map and street alinements and lots should be readjusted to reflect a 130 foot right-of-way in this area. 4. This tract shall make a contribution for a future signal at Lot G with the intersection of Monterey Road. 5. This tract shall ,pay the required drainage and park fees as required by the City of Palm Desert Ordinances. 6. All curbs and gutters shall be in conformance with the City of Palm Desert Standard Plan R-1. March 14, 1978 Paul A. Williams Director of Environmental Services City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 Reference: Tentative Tract No. 12202 Provide the following fire protection: 1 . Install a water system capable of delivering 2500 GPM fire flow from any fire hydrant for a two hour duration in addition to domestic supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement. 2. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants located at each street intersection (a) but not greater than 500 feet apart in any direction. A. Exterior surface of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow, and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. B. Curbs shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. 3. Prior to recordation of the final map, the developer shall furnish the original and three (3) copies of the water system plan to the Fire Marshal for review. 4. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and approved by the water company, with the following certification : "I certify that the design of the water system in Tract No. TT 12202 is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Fire Marshal . " Upon approval , the original plan will be returned to the developer. Very truly yours , David L. Flake Fire Chief 8Uep Bud Engel Fire Marshal \I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 19 COMPANY 3700 CENTRAL AVENUE • RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA R.W.RIDDELL Eastern Division Distribution Planning Supervisor Mailing Address P.O. BOX M, RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92516 March 15, 1978 Location of [dearest Gas Main: Monterey Ave, N/0 Park View Dr. City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, CA 92260 Re: TT 12202 - Sunrise Co. This letter is not to be interpreted as a contractual commitment to serve the proposed project; but only as an information service. Its intent is to notify you that the Southern California Gas Company has facilities in the area where the above named project is proposed. Gas service to the project could be provided from an existing main without any significant impact on the environment. The service would be in accordance with the Company's policies and extension rules on file with the California Public Utilities Commission at the time contractual arrangements are made. The availability of natural gas service, as set forth in this letter, is based upon present conditions of gas supply and regulatory policies. As a public utility, the Southern California Gas Company is under the jurisdiction of the California Public Utilities Commission. We can also be affected by actions of federal regulatory agencies. Should these agencies take any action which affects gas supply or the condition under which service is available, gas service will be provided in accordance with revised conditions. We have developed several programs which are available, upon request, to provide assistance in selecting the most effective applications of energy conservation techniques for a particular project. If you desire further information on any of our energy conservation programs , please contact this office for assistance. RECEIVE ® MAR 1 I 11 U ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CITY OF PALM DESERT, �eF City of RANCHO MIRAGE 69-825 HIGHWAY 117 RANCHO MIRAGE CALIFORNIA 92270 TELEPHONE (714)328-8871 !lreD� March 17, 1978 Mr. Paul A. Williams Director of Environmental Services City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, California 92260 Dear Paul : The City Council , at their meeting of March 16, reviewed as completely as possible considering the time restraint in returning recommendations to you by March 17, the Sunrise Company, Tentative Tract Map #TT 12202. .Comments and recommendations are as follows. 1 . Require the developer to install a signal at Monterey and Cb.ancy Lane which would be serving their main entrance. 2. Clancy Lane has been vacated by Rancho Mirage at a point between the substation and the school . This, in effect, would preclude traffic leaving the project to use Clancy Lane for travel to Bob Hope Drive. Therefore, the only means to enter Palm Desert in the event Monterey is .closed at the wash would be north on Monterey to Country Club and then either to Cook Street or Bob Hope Bridge. 3. Due to the fact that Sunrise Corporation is approaching completion of Las Palmas and proceeding with the subject tract in Palm Desert, the Council felt that an additional time period should be given for input by Rancho Mirage especially in regard to participation in redoing Monterey, the matter of full curbs and gutters and for participation in the under- grounding of power lines. If you have any questions, I would be glad to attend your Land Division Committee meeting on March 22. Please advise. Cordially, William J. Probert City Manager cc: cc: Mayor Ed Mullins R C I1) City Council 91IAR 17 1M-1 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CITY OF PALM DESERT r TO: - Mr, Paul A. Williams, Director of Environmental Services City of Palm Desert FROM: Lloyd W. Rogers, R.S. , Supervising Sanitarian Riverside County Health Department - Desert District DATE: March 16, 1978 SUBJECT: TT 12202 Due to the fact that TT 12202 is provided with sewage disposal by a sanitary sewage disposal system and water is provided by an approved domestic water supply, we have no comments at this time. CY ( I I i i f i i RECEIVED MAR ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CITY OF PALM DESERT GOUNi� ' ESTABLISHED IN 191E AS A PUBLIC AV. _Y ��STRIC� COACHELLA VALLEY COUNTY WATER DISTRICT POST OFFICE BOX 1058 COACHELLA, CALIFORNIA 92236 • TELEPHONE (714)398-2651 DIRECTORS OFFICERS RAYMOND R. RUMMONDS, PRESIDENT LOWELL O. WEEKS, GENERAL MANAGER-CHIEF ENGINEER TELLIS CODEKAS, VICE PRESIDENT OLE J. NORDIAND, SECRETARY C. J. FROST WALTER R. WRIGHT, AUDITOR WILLIAM B. GARDNER REDWINE AND SHERRILL, ATTORNEY< STEVE D.BUXTON March 22, 1978 File: 0163. 11 o421 . 1 0721 . 1 Department of Environmental Services City of Palm Desert P. 0. Box 1977 Palm Desert, California 92260 Re: Tract 12202 Sec. 8 & 17, T5S, R6E Gentlemen: This area is protected from stormwater flows by the Whitewater River Storm- water Channel and may be considered safe from stormwater flows except in rare instances. The District will furnish domestic water and sanitation service to said area in accordance with the currently prevailing regulations of this District. This area shall be annexed to Improvement District Nos . 16 & 70 of the Coachella Valley County Water District for domestic water service. This area shall be annexed to Improvement District Nos. 53, 54 & 80 of the Coachella Valley County Water District for sanitation service. The District will need additional facilities to provide for the orderly expansion of its domestic water system. These facilities may include wells , reservoirs and booster pumping stations. The developer will be required to provide land on which some of these facilities will be located. These sites shall be down on the tract map as lots to be deeded to the District for such purpose. Very tr ly yours , Lowe 1 0. Wee ' General Manage -Chief Engineer KEH:vh cc: Riverside County Dept. of Public Health RI E C E1 �E p 46-209 Oasis St. �f Indio, CA 92201 NfAF2 2 � 110078) ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CITY OF PALM DESERT PROOF OF PUBLICATION This space is for the County Clerk's Filing Stamp (2015.5 C.C.P.) STATE OF CALIFORNIAt ss. County of Riverside I 1 1 am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above Proof of Publication of 1 entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of PALM DESERT POST, a newspaper of general circu- lation, published weekly, in Palm Desert, County of ------------------C''T=---A&--B-A-Lt4--DESERJTF-------- ---- Riverside, and which newspaper has been adjudged CASE NO. TT 12202 a newspaper of general circulation by the Superior Request for approval of a tentative tract Court of the County of Riverside, State of oa°oo�> o under date of October 5, 1964, Case Numbel � •> that the notice, of which the annexed is a prin� pn0 E o£°��^ of. n has been published in each regular and entire -Z°'°Eg;= mw f� said newspaper and not in an supplement th1 °B€O.Iao ;� Y PP a_Y,bo$nm� n v7 f r 3ve=„€ N the following dates to-wit: coo r$� nr °on NEoO- .~c 1 vfa Q,C `>>c yES€t May 4, 1978 zE a:o$oa>. " -15 2� a -.- aE° €8">. o- u- ----- ---- ......................._-------------'--- o u wb 6mom ' bc-O .. C11 OE uJo Z>Kc u-om«�+co O a - w a co oo= �n z" m°$aVfchB+u aa8 .N '• cp jo >°ai I certify (or declare) under penalty or perjury foregoing is true and correct. �o uFH a pujt0-3ju arO, up t/ CPF � \\ d OWV $� GH = Oz<00 °o >zu Signature --- — — >� �Wwz i u oEoE �aw$aw» ao - oo=- W� Wnzo J- 1" emu_Wzu ooWUIE� i uW WNJaa¢w °° 1� r£�„ O MMaY 5, 1978 .<—OWE Date------ W << �JJ - W i«wu t�E€ at Palm Desert, California owoofWv,zaW- J rc-nW _�= =� '$ nxnnn wu>`o aoo< WW o WE anMow�o n'6 nnof�0W Wa Onua- Wo oan�mao ILL-ul-OO 0>>0dW�n uh n'Ea`o - OOO�Fuw O�$� pdhn WOtt2_OS .A 9 .KHdwIJF- 2_, 4..Jfc.. 'L.ifr .L f: _ 1 O 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE April 21 , 1978 APPLICANT Sunrise Company 42-000 Bob Hope Dr. Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 CASE NO. : TT 12202 The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of April 18, 1978 . CONTINUED TO DENIED XXX APPROVED BY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 351 PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF FOR CONCURRENCE WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION. XXX PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF May 25, 1978 FOR PUBLIC HEARING. Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Environmental Services, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. PAUL A. WILLIAMS, SECRETARY PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSSION cc: Applicant C.V.C.W.D. File INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM City of Palm Desert TO: Paul FROM: Ralph SUBJECT: Extension of San Pablo DATE: March 30, 1978 Investigation of our records and those of .Riverside County indicate 50' of right-of-way has been dedicated for the extension of San Pablo Avenue on the east border of the College of the Desert . �1 �� @���� ��\��� - -� �; - - - _ !, - - -, ;; - �: - �. ,. _�.� .,. t. 7 1.26641,3/1/73 TFJ.o J 1 • S�,Ine).3781,1/10/72 • t 1' • I +, I CHANNEL c;.r um;rs cur or p / I ulna { I I CVM WD I tI Py�?S I yrN � •1 b O.R.3703/389-. + Mop .4 Nr J R.S. 2013? pLtN 688-p IR/W) I . aG/9J o 0 b I R.S. 29/58 o O - 10,0m, Easel, I R.S. 3..16! m 9/P/ E e130731,12/23/69;�+[ I A,4 7i.. u O.R.3664/24I_-_94 —43 RD ''Ce+J}'.,wk.r,{E 1 �POIT Od3e�f Clly L1m_i t I -- --� AVE MAGNESIA IDs_.-aFFlA.-L2 L So e a. DR. turver PLOT _._.O.R.3129/213 5/ 0/71.w1 U 'aza -AA raRA.7393_T.� ;ra � CITY OF PALM DESERT rY' I M O.R.3664/237-' 4 iQ AGE •1 ,R.S. 51/57 I �^ Resolution No. 73-405 II-26-73 lo'DrnO Eati 1, y//T . A 130732 12/73/69--.� -30' I ' w San Pablo D,am SS ,ari- e^ w i P •,Vm. 0.R. 606, Ina1.37970,4/2/74-- 1 A • 2/l0/6/4664, _ I- ---744-G(P/P) 744-GIP/P)--.... •1 I i 1 ' r v O.R.3560/13 -� 1 I I 1 O.R.3664/235-j I x —1- _ DRIVE i_ 6 , v 10'DrnO Eatelm----�I W I _ f J I14 w o. , MAP 113-C I t,ri•( .¢ SPN INOSA 0 .I o z 0 -� z a 1 a II Q ( 0 � •n L�f�.,G y _CSrQI EJ I _ f NI- N D) 9 V w J F17, I O AVE, w a $Ap0�4 AVE. 4m I I a, la III - - Ia p 66 --.I--^•R.A.12304(Raads Acce led) I --RI NOH -1 - \ccepM1d .W M.B.21/ a I P )• '}' f - g GLORIANA FOR. I z 5. ,9i 5• I 1 115d50 �___.I66,.."p' • rc m —�0 790-S lTpppo) A107136,H/65 69' _1° _ 744-G(P/Pl �0.R.3129/213---_^ 798-L(D.P•) I PALM4 i^.LLAiE iJNI r NO. /o - .. II?'.i•, a ,n -- 2] -- N.B. 22//7 - 1 L_ 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE March 29, 1978 APPLICANT SUNRISE COMPANY 42-000 Bob Hope Drive Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 CASE No. : TT 12202 The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of March 28, 1978 XX CONTINUED TO April 19th DENIED APPROVED BY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PLACED ON THE AGE14DA OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF FOR CONCURRENCE WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION. PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF FOR PUBLIC HEARING. Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Environmental Services, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. PAUL A. WILLIAMS, SECRETARY PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSSION cc: Applicant C.V.C,W,D. File SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA sCOMPANY 3I00 CENTRAL AVENUE • RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA R.W.RIDDELL Eastern Division Distribution Planning Supervisor Mailing Address P.O. BOX 2200, RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92516 March 15, 1978 Location of Clearest Gas Main: Monterey Ave. N/0 Park View Dr, City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, CA 92260 Re: TT 12202 - Sunrise Co. This letter is not to be interpreted as a contractual commitment to serve the proposed project; but only as an information service. Its intent is to notify you that the Southern California Gas Company has facilities in the area where the above named project is proposed. Gas service to the project could be provided from an existing main without any significant impact on the environment. The service would be in accordance with the Company's policies and extension rules on file with the California Public Utilities Commission at the time contractual arrangements are made. The availability of natural gas service, as set forth in this letter, is based upon present conditions of gas supply and regulatory policies. As a public utility, the Southern California Gas Company is under the jurisdiction of the California Public Utilities Commission. We can also be affected by actions of federal regulatory agencies. Should these agencies take any action which affects gas supply or the condition under which service is available, gas service will be provided in accordance with revised conditions. We have developed several programs which are available, upon request, to provide assistance in selecting the most effective applications of energy conservation techniques for a particular project. If you desire further information on any of our energy conservation programs , please contact this office for assistance. w1r` n 1n'71 , U ENVIRONMENTAL'SERVICES CITY OF PALM DESERT TO: Mr. Paul A. Williams, Director of Environmental Services City of Palm Desert FROM: Lloyd W. Rogers, R.S. , Supervising Sanitarian Riverside County Health Department — Desert District DATE: March 16, 1978 SUBJECT: TT 12202 Due to the fact that TT 12202 is provided with sewage disposal by a sanitary sewage disposal system and water is provided by an approved domestic water supply, we have no comments at this time. ()4 J i E ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CITY OF PALM DESERT 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Case No. : TT 12202 Project: Tentative Tract Map for approximately 460 condominium units Applicant: SUNRISE COMPANY Enclosed please find materials describing a project for which the following is being requested: Approval of a Tentative Tract map to divide approximately 155 acres within the PR-4, S.P. and PR-6, S.P. zones into 33 lots to provide for approximately 460 condominium units, common recreation areas, water well sites and buffer areas on property gen- erally located east of Monterey Avenue and south of the proposed Desert Squire Country Club. j The attached data was prepared by the applicant and is being forwarded to you for comments and recommended Conditions of Approval . The City is interested in the probable impacts on the natural environment (e.g. water and air pollution) and on public resources (e.g. demand for schools, hospitals , parks, power generation, sewage treatment, etc. ) Your comments and recommended conditions of approval must be received by this office prior to 5:00 p.m. March 17 , 1978, in order to be discussed by the Land Division Committee at their meeting of March 22nd The Land Division Committee (comprised of Director of Environmental Services , City Building Official , City Engineer, Fire Marshal and a representative of CVCWD) will discuss the comments and recommended conditions of approval and will forward them to the Planning Commission through the staff report. Any information received by this office after the receipt deadline will not be discussed by the Land Division Com- mittee nor will it be forwarded to the Planning Commission for consid- eration. Very truly yours, Paul A. Williams Director of Environmental Services PAW/ks PLEASE RETURN MAP WITH COMMENTS INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM City of Palm Desert TO: Director of Enviromental Services FROM: Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Tentative Map 12202 DATE: February 21, 1978 1 . According to the subdivision ordinance no cul-de-sac streets shall be in excess of 600' . It appears that Lot H could join Lot E eliminating a long cul-de-sac. Lot D can possibly join with Lot F eliminating an extremely long cul-de-sac situation, 2. The four-way intersection of Lot h, Lot G, Lot J should be eliminated with off-set streets if at all possible. 3. Type C curb with Riverside County Standard No. 202. is not acceptable in the City. The City of Palm Desert uses straight faced curb. Standard Drawing No. R1. 4. The area labeled as County Flood Control Drain Easement being 100' in width should be increased to 130' and I believe, should be labeled in favor of Palm Desert in lieu of County. 5. Emergency Access should be provided at the southeasterly corner of the tract off Lot E. 6. This tract should make a cash contribution for a signal at the intersection of Lot J and Monterey Road, 7. This tract should fall under the new drainage ordinance of the City of Palm Desert and fees should be collected therefore, 8. a. Magnesia Falls Drive is slated to be 110' in width thereby requiring a dedication of 55' from this perperty. b. The question arises whether or notMagnesia Falls Drive should be improved half width. If the property to the south developes in the same manner i .e. zoning, then there would be no need for any improvement of this street. Should it develop in any other manner the City would be obligated to ask for the improvement of z of the street. FROM CITY OF PALM DESERT 45-VS PRICY PEAR LANE P.O. SOX 1648 PALM DESERT, CA. 92260 PHONE (714) 346-0611 SUBJECT: ! DATE`-l-1 )l h_ tk�a....n.�+✓tit. — �_�,._--� n�•aVs r'�W-�--.� `w� --._.-.no�.s.r�� `�vw'Y` 1.*�'^^.'� �+..<h.1— 1y�...:.� PLEASE REPLY TO SIGNED �• y " _ z4a�-mli- f - a. DATE I SIGNED SEND GREENTINT AND PINK COPIES WITH CARBONS INTACT. PINK COPY IS RETURNED WITH REPLY. RETURN TO SENDER FROM .�. ,�� v� CITY OF PALM DESERT TO ' `- ' "-' -" -- --` -- ' - 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE ra� �Jyy '`.._ --------- - P.O. BOX 1648 PALM DESERT, CA. 92260 PHONE p14) 346-0611 SUBJECT ��201 C � `\ DATE PLEASE REPLY TO SIGNED DATE I SIGNED SEND GREENTINT AND PINK COPIES WITH CARBONS INTACT. PINK COPY IS RETURNED WITH REPLY. DETACH THIS COPY = RETAIN FOR ANSWER PROOF OF PUBLICATION This space is for the County Clerk's Filing Stamp -42015.5 C.C.P.) STATE OF CALIFORNIAi ss. County of Riverside I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above Proof of Publication of entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of PALM DESERT POST, a newspaper of general circu- lation, published weekly, in Palm Desert, County of - -City o es e r - -- Riverside, and which newspaper has been adjudged a newspaper of general circulation by the Superior Case No . TT 12202 Court of the County of Riverside, State of California, under date of October 5, 1964, Case Number 83658; that the notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy, --- has been published in each regular and entire issue of --------------------------------------------- said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on Paste clipping the following dates to-wit: of Notice SECURELY In This Space ------------------3,/..1-6------------------------------------------------------ I certify (or declare) under penalty or perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Signature Mh 16 _8_ Date----------- ar c ---- --- ----------------- _____ 197-- at Palm Desert, California LEGAL NOTICE reouosT by the SUNRISE COMPANY for approval of a Tentative CITY OF PALM DESERT Trott Man to divide approximately 155 acres within the PR-5, li REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP S.P. (Planned Residential, maximum 4 du/are Scenic Preser- j 'TO DIVIDE APPROXIMATELY 155 ACRES INTO 33 LOTS TO vation overlay)and PR-6,S.P. (Planned Residential,maximum ' PROVIDE FOR APPROXIMATELY 460 CONDOMINUM 6 du/acre Scenic Preservation overlay) zones into 33 lots 1 UNITS, COMMON RECREATION AREAS, WATER WELL provide far approximately 460 condomin um units,common rec-, SITES AND BUFFER AREAS ON PROPERTY GENERALLY reafiOn areas, water well sites and buffer areas on property. LOCATED EAST OF MONTEREY AVENUE AND SOUTH OF generally located east of Monterey Avenue and contiguous to the THE PROPOSED DESERT SQUIRE COUNTRY CLUB. south.border of the proposed Desert Souire Country Club,more CASE NO. TT 12202 Particularly described as: NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be Portion Of South yx of Sec,8,T5S,R6E,S.B.M.ands portiariat held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a north ys of Section. 17, 75S, R6E, S.B.M. .[ I TT 12202 g1 r t ypg i oq i W ZpW t s [ 1� a*r or e.[u oowr cnr u•w COLLE6E Or E SEIPT SAID Public Hearing will be held an Tuesday,March 28, 1978, and be heard. at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers in the Palm Desert City P UL A. WILLIAMS, Secretary Hall, 45-275 Prickly Poor Lars, Palm Desert, California, of amhg Commission which time and place,all infer PDP-3/16t1 INTEROFFICE MEMORAND City of Palm Desert TO: Planning Commission FROM: Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Tentative Tract 12202 DATE: March 15, 1978 1. Lot C. designated as street, and Lot D, designated as street, are not in conformance with the ordinance of being 600 feet or less in length. Lot D, and Lot E create a 4-way intersection that the City tries to discourage. If a relocation of this intersection by alternating Lot D and Lot E onto Lot G street can be accomplished. 2 Magnesia Falls Drive shall be fully improved providing the development to the south is not contemplated at this time. A possibility exists as to bonding for Magnesia Falls should this be advantageous for development and constructed at a later date. 3. The Palm Desert Flood Control Channel as proposed on the easterly side of this tract does not scale 130 feet. The map and street alinements and lots should be readjusted to reflect a 130 foot right-of-way in this area. 4. This tract shall make a contribution for a future signal at Lot G with the intersection of Monterey Road. 5. This tract shall pay the required drainage and park fees as required by the City of Palm Desert Ordinances. 6. All curbs and gutters shall be in conformance with the City of Palm Desert Standard Plan R-1. March 14, 1978 Paul A. Williams Director of Environmental Services City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 Reference: Tentative Tract No. 12202 Provide the following fire protection: 1 . Install a water system capable of delivering 2500 GPM fire flow from any fire hydrant for a two hour duration in addition to domestic supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement. 2. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants located at each street intersection (a) but not greater than 500 feet apart in any direction. A. Exterior surface of hydrant barrels and heads shall be. painted chrome yellow, and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. B. Curbs shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. 3. Prior to recordation of the final map, the developer shall furnish the original and three (3) copies of the water system plan to the Fire Marshal for review. 4. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and approved by the water company, with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system in Tract No. TT 12202 is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Fire Marshal . " Upon approval , the original plan will be returned to the developer. Very truly yours , David L. Flake Fire Chief ��^^ suao Bud Engel Fire Marshal o - 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 - TELEPHONE (714).346-0611 March 13, 1978 _ LEGAL NOTICE CITY OF PALM DESERT REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP TO DIVIDE APPROXIMATELY 155 ACRES INTO 33 LOTS TO PROVIDE FOR APPROXIMATELY 460 CONDOMINIUM UNITS, COMMON RECREATION AREAS, WATER WELL SITES AND BUFFER AREAS ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED EAST OF MONTEREY AVENUE AND SOUTH OF THE PROPOSED DESERT SQUIRE COUNTRY CLUB. CASE NO. TT 12202 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by the SUNRISE COMPANY for approval of a Tentative Tract Map to divide approximately 155 acres within the PR-5, S.P. (Planned Residential , maximum 4 du/acre, Scenic Preservation overlay) and PR-6, S.P. (Planned Residential , maximum 6 du/acre Scenic Preservation overlay) zones into 33 lots to provide for approximately 460 condominium units, common recreation areas, water well sites and buffer areas on property generally located east of Monterey Avenue and contiguous to the south border of the proposed Desert Squire Country Club, more particularly described as: Portion of South 2 of Sec. 8, TSS, R6E, S.B.M. and a portion of north # of Section. 17, TSS., R6E, S.B.M. I Ii � I 1 .. J Ci,, limit m0 S r TT 12202 W V V � MKMJ AI/MG9 Clry'[A•/Y 111 O { r rtY Oi PALM DESENT db,Umif C f't. ._COLLEGE Ole E ESE'RT _ 4 nil II SAID Public Hearing will be held on Tuesday, March 28, 1978, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers in the Palm Desert City Hall , 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place, all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. PAUL A. WILLIAMS, Secretary Palm Desert Planning Commission PUBLISH: Palm Desert Post March 16, 1978 ,�:, h�t �.Q.D ���P� � (��s j ?j 'd:P� �� ' � �� • 1 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Case No. : TT 12202 Project: Tentative Tract Map for approximately 460 condominium units Applicant: SUNRISE COMPANY Enclosed please find materials describing a project for which the following is being requested: Approval of a Tentative Tract map to divide approximately 155 acres within the PR-4, S.P. and PR-6, S.P. zones into 33 lots to provide for approximately 460 condominium units, common recreation areas, water well sites and buffer areas on property gen- erally located east of Monterey Avenue and south of the proposed Desert Squire Country Club. ) The attached data was prepared by the applicant and is being forwarded to you for comments and recommended Conditions of Approval . The City is interested in the probable impacts on the natural environment (e.g. water and air pollution) and on public resources (e.g. demand for schools , hospitals , parks, power generation, sewage treatment, etc. ) Your comments and recommended conditions of approval must be received by this office prior to 5:00 p.m. March 17 , 1978, in order to be discussed by the Land Division Committee at their meeting of March 22nd The Land Division Committee (comprised of Director of Environmental Services, City Building Official , City Engineer, Fire Marshal and a representative of CVCWD) will discuss the comments and recommended conditions of approval and will forward them to the Planning Commission through the staff report. Any information received by this office after the receipt deadline will not be discussed by the Land Division Com- mittee nor will it be forwarded to the Planning Commission for consid- eration. Very truly yours, Paul A. Williams Director of Environmental Services PAW/ks PLEASE RETURN MAP WITH COMMENTS CIRCULATION LIST FOR ALL CASES Circulation of Tentative Maps, Parcel Maps, CUP'S, GPA's, etc: REVIEW COMMITTEE: ✓1. Palm Desert Director of Environmental Services - Paul Williams 2. Palm Desert Director of Building & Safety - Jim Hill Palm Desert Director of Public Works - L. Clyde Beebe Palm Desert Fire Marshall - Bud Engel 5. Robert P. Brock Office of Road Commissioner and County Surveyor Administration Office Building, Room 313 46-209 Oasis Street Indio, California 92201 (Phone: 347-8511, ext 267) Lloyd Rogers Supervisor - Riverside County Health Department County Administration Building, Room r;;t•, 46-209 Oasis Street Indio, California 92201 (Phone: 347-8511, ext 287) 7. Lowell 0. Weeks / General Manager - Chief Engineer Coachella Valley County Water District (C.V.C.W.D. ) P. 0. Box 1058 Coachella, California 92236 (Phone: (714) 398-2651) 8. R. J. Lowry ' Project Development Services California- Department of Transportation P. 0. Box 231 San Bernardino, California 92403 (Phone: (714) 383-4671 ) 9. _ Director of Planning and Building City of Indian Wells 45-300 Club Drive Indian Wells, California 92260 (Phone: 345-2831) 10. Director of Planning City of Rancho Mirage 69-825 Highway 111 Rancho Mirage, California 92270 (Phone: 328-8871) 11. Kermit Martin J Southern California Edison Company P. 0. Box 203 Palm Desert, California 92260 (Phone: 346-8660) 12. Chuck Morris General Telephone Company J 62-147 Desertaire Road Joshua Tree, California 92252 (Phone: 366-8389) 13. R. W. Riddell Engineering Department JSouthern California Gas Company P. 0. Box 2200 Riverside, California 92506 (Phone: 327-8531, ask for Riverside extension 214) Circulation List for All Cases Page Two 14. Roger Harlow Director - Pupil Personnel Service Desert Sands Unified School District 83-049 Avenue 46 Indio, California 92201 (Phone: 347-4071) 15. Jim Langdon JPalm Desert Disposal Services, Inc. 36-711 Cathedral Canyon Drive P. 0. Drawer LL Cathedral City, California 92234 (Phone: 328-2585 or 328-4687) 16. Stanley Sayles President, Palm Desert Community Services District 44-500 Portola Avenue Palm Desert, California 92260 (Phone : 346-6338) 17. Regional Water Quality Control Board 73:-271 Highway 111 , Suite 21 Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 (Phone: ) 18. Harold Horsley Foreman/Mails U. S. Post Office Palm Desert, California 92260 (Phone: 346-3864) 19. Joe Benes Vice President & General Manager Coachella Valley Television P. 0. Box 368 Palm Desert, California 92260 (Phone: 346-8157) 20. Don McNeely President - Palm Desert Chamber of Commerce P. 0. Box 908 Palm Desert, California 92260 (Phone: 346-6111) 21. Scott McClellan, Senior Planner Riverside County Planning Commission County Administration Building, Room 304 46-209 Oasis Street Indio, California 92201 (Phone: 347-8511, ext. 277, 278, & 279) 22. James Whitehead Superintendent - District 6 State Parks and Recreation 1350 Front Street, Room 6054 San Diego, California 92101 (Phone: (714) 236-7411) 23. Les Pricer Redevelopment Agency 73-677 Highway 111 Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 (Phone: 346-6920 24. Robert I. Pitchford, Chairman Architectural Committee of the Palm Desert Property Owners Assoc. 73-833 E1 Paseo Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 y A ( (ad Qalama DQoQ�q 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT CA. 92260 sr�����S�Lsz�����S�J ��z51�Z4✓zS ***TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP*** DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION SUNRISE COMPANY Applicant l please print) 42-000 Bob Hope Drive 714-328-8945 Mailing Address Telephone Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 City State Zip-Code REQUEST: (Describe specific nature of approval requested) Approval of Tentative Subdivision Map No. 12202 containing 41 lots and 460 condominium units. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Attached ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. Attached EXISTING ZONING PR-6 ,S.P and PR-4 , S .P. Property Owner Authorization THE UNDERSIGNED STATES THAT THEY ARE THE OWNERS)OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN AND HEREBY GIVE AUTHOR- IZATION FOR THE FILING OF THIS APPLICATION. See Attached SIGNATURE DATE AGREEMENT ABSOLVING THE CITY OF PALM DESERT OF ALL LIABILITIES RELATIVE TO ANY DEED RESTRICTIONS. I DO BY MY SIGNATURE ON THIS AGREEMENT, ABSOLVE THE CITY OF PALM DESERT OF ALL LIABILITIES REGARDING ANY DEED RES- nTRICTIONS THAT MAY BE APPLICABLE TO THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN. '! 3/2/78 SIGNATURE DATE Applicants Signature _ 3/2/78 Jack S(GNA TUAOnlon DATE (FOR STAFF USE ONLY l ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS 11�°11 11.. ACCEPTED BY ❑ MINISTERIAL ACT E.A.No. ❑ CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION /'`/i S n'O ❑ NEGATIVE DECLARATION `'A E I V ❑ OTHER .I REFERENCE CASE NO. ASSESSOR' S PARCEL NUMBERS 621-350-005 621-350-006 621-350-025 621-350-026 LAW OFFICES ROGERS & HARRIS STANLEY ROGERS 9200 SUNSET BOULEVARD-SUITE 404 MICHAEL HARRIS LOS ANOELE5,CALIFORNIA 90069 JANE F. ROGERS OF COUNSEL (213) 2J2-8�89 LEE SAVIN (213) 278-3142 February 28 , 1978 Mr. Jack Conlon 5 c/o Sunrise Corporation 42-300 Bob Hope Drive Rancho Mirage , California 92270 RE : 140± Acre Property - Monterey Avenue , Palm Desert, California (Morris Property) Dear Mr. Conlon: Per our conversation today , I hereby authorize you or William Bone to file all necessary applications on behalf of Maxprop, Inc. for development of that property commonly referred to as the "Morris" property in the City of Palm Desert and described on the attached plot plan . Very truly yours ', Stanley Rogers President of Maxprop, Inc. SR: jg cc: C. Douglas Wikle , Esq. Bruce J. Altshuler, Esq. Stanley P. Witkoww, Esq. r DESCRIPTION The land referred to in this report is situated in the county of Riverside, state of California, and is described as follows : PARCEL 1 : That portion of the East half of the Northwest quarter of Section 17, Township 5 South, Range 6 East, San Bernardino Meridian, in the City of Palm Desert, County of Riverside, State of California, according to the Official Plat thereof, lying Southerly of the following described line: Beginning at a point on the West line of the East half of the Northwest quarter of said Section 17, which is distant South, 794. 00 feet from the Northwest corner of said East half of the Northwest quarter; thence Southeasterly on a straight line to a point on the East line of said East half of the Northwest quarter, which is distant South, 1 ,282.00 feet from the Northeast corner of said East half of the Northwest quarter. Said land is within the area shown by Map on file in Book 20 page 38 of Record of Surveys in the Office of the County Recorder of said County. PARCEL 2: That portion of the West half of the Northwest quarter of Section 17, Township 5 South, Range 6 East, San Bernardino Meridian, in the City of Palm Desert, County of Riverside, State of California, according to the Official Plat thereof, described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast corner of the West half of the Northwest quarter of said Section 17; thence Northerly on the East line of said West half of the Northwest quarter, North 00°04'40" East, 1 ,626.37 feet; thence South 89°50' 00" West, 1 ,326. 18 feet to the West line of said West half of the Northwest quarter; thence Southerly on said West line, South 00°05' 10" West, 1 ,627.87 feet to the Southwest corner of said West half of the Northwest quarter; thence Easterly on the South line of said West half of the Northwest quarter, South 89°46'00" East, 1 ,326.83 feet to the point of beginning. Except the Westerly rectangular 54. 00 feet as conveyed to the City of Palm Desert in deed recorded April 8, 1974 as Instrument No. 40342 of Official Records. PARCEL 3: That portion of the West half of the Northeast quarter of Section 17, Township 5 South, Range 6 East, San Bernardino Meridian, in the City of Palm Desert, County of Riverside, State of California, according to the Official Plat thereof, lying Southerly of the following described line: Beginning at a point on the West line of the West half of the Northeast quarter of said Section 17, which is distant South, 1 ,282.00 feet from the Northwest corner of said West half of the Northeast quarter; thence ' Southeasterly on a straight line to a point on the East line of said West half of the Northeast quarter, which is distant South, 1 ,626. 00 feet from the Northeast corner of said West half of the Northeast quarter. Said land is within the area shown by Map on file in Book 29 page 58. of Record of Surveys in the Office of the County Recorder of said County. PARCEL 4: That portion of the West half of the Northwest quarter of Section 17, Township 5 South, Range 6 East, San Bernardino Meridian, in the City of Palm Desert, County of Riverside, State of California, according to the Official Plat thereof, lying Northerly of the following described line: Beginning at the Southeast corner of the West half of the Northwest quarter of said Section 17; thence Northerly on the East line of said West half of the Northwest quarter, North 00°04'40" East, 1 ,626.37 feet; thence South 89°50'00" West, 1 ,326. 18 feet to the West line of said West half of the Northwest quarter. Except the Northeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of the Northwest quarter. Also except that portion of the Northwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of the Northwest quarter lying Northerly of the Northerly line of-the Coachella Valley County Water District Storm Water Channel , said Nw.Lherly line is described as follows: Beginning at a point on the West line of the West half of the Northwest quarter of said Section 17, which is distant South 497. 64 feet from the Northwest corner of said Section 17; said point being on a non-tangent curve of 11 ,500.00 feet radius, concave Southerly, a tangent bears South . 83024'26" East; thence Southeasterly, 75.49 feet on said curve through a central angle of 00°22' 34" ; thence South 83°47'00" East, 591 .56 feet to a point on the West line of the Northeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of said Section 17, which is distant South, 573.72 feet from the Northwest corner of said Northeast .quarter of the Northwest quarter of the Northwest quarter. Also except the Westerly rectangular 54. 00 feet as conveyed to the City of Palm Desert in Deed Recorded April 8, 1974 as Instrument No. 40342 of Official Records. IA 22 IN! a 6 = ' ct -12 52 Ac C.W.D J4c '- v c 2 1p r._ 19 ,027 � r I v V , TThis Is not a so" of tho land, but Is COMD11'A _ N - for Information only, nor Is it a part of the r>port or policy to which It may bo attached. �'.' CERTIFIED PROPERTY OWNERS' LIST AFFIDAVIT STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) SEE ATTACHED CITY OF PALM DESERT ) I• hereby certify that the attached list contains the names and addresses of all persons to whom all property is assessed as they appear on the latest available assess- ment role of the County within the area described on the attached application and for a distance of three hundred (300) feet from the exterior boundaries of the property described on the attached application. I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. (signed) (date) RE:;E[VE0 r� FEB 15 197a TITLE INSURANCE AND TRUST I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ATTACHED LIST OF NAMES ARE THE MOST RECENT ASSESSED OWNERS OF PROPERTY WITHIN A 300 FOOT RADIUS OF PARCELS xx AS INDICATED BY THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY ASSESSORS ROLES, MARCH, 1977-1978. DENISE HYER STATE OF CALIFORNIA) SS COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ON FEBRUARY 13, 1978, BEFORE ME THE UNDERSIGNED, A NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SAID STATE, PERSONALLY APPEARED DENISE HYER KNOWN TO ME TO BE THE PERSON WHOSE NAME IS SUBSCRIBED TO THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT: WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL 7% OFFICIAL SEAL DORATHEA DcPEUGH OTARY PUBLIC :ui I" NIA RIVERSIDE .tiiY'ommission EzpjrtsP:cv: 5, 978 �yGas 621-350-005 � ) 621-350-006 621-350-025 621-350-026 Title Insurance and Trust Company 3490 Tenth Street P.O. Box 707 Riverside,Cali tornia 92502 714 686 4180 ATICOR COMPANY Page 1 of 2 NAME AND ADDRESSES OF PROPERTY OWNERS FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON CASE NO. JOB NO. REF. PARCEL NO. NAME ADDRESS (1) 621-350-001 CONSOLIDATED LAND % Schlecht & McCullough (3) 621-350-013 INVESTMENT CO. 383 South Palm Canyon Drive (4) 621-350-014 Palm Springs, CA 92262 (8) 621-350-022 " (2) 621-350-008 PLUM, Elmer, et al 260 Brawley Avenue Thermal CA 92274 (5) 621-350-016 WEINER, Ted Ted Weiner Oil Properties (6) 621-350-017 P . O. Box 12819 (7) 621-350-018 Fort Work, TX 76115 (9) 621-350-023 (10) 621-350-024 HOMME, Orrin R. % Schlecht & McCullough 383 South Palm Canyon Drive Palm Springs, CA 92262 (11) 621-350-801 COACHELLA VALLEY COUNTY P. O. Box 1058 (32) 621-290-801 WATER DISTRICT Coachella, CA 92236 (12) 621-360-001 REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSIT % Jack Schappe11 OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 2200 University Avenue - 615 Berkley, CA 94720 (13) 621-360-007 RIGDON, Warren E. 75-269 Palm Shadow Indian Wells, CA 92260 (14) 621-360-801 COACHELLA VALLEY JUNIOR COLLEGE DISTR. (15) 621-250-012 PLAZA INVESTMENT CO. 42-000 Bob Hope Drive (16) 621-250-022 Rancho Mirage CA 92270 (17) 621-250-026 (18) 621-250-031 '19) 621-250-032 (20) 621-250-034 (22) 621- - 7 __ _ Page 2 of 2 NAME AND ADDRESSES OF PROPERTY ObINERS FOR PUBLIC NEARING ON CASE NO. JOB NO. PARCEL NO. NAME ADDRESS (23) 621-250-078 PLAZA INVESTMENT CO. 42-000 Bob Hope Drive (24) 621-250-079 Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 (29) 621-290-020 (21) 621-250-070 COUNTRY CLUB. REALTY 42-000 Bob Hope Drive (30) 621-290-021 CORPORATION Rancho Mirage, CA 92270— (31) 621-290-022 (25) 621-290-001 ALEXANDER, William M. 2071 Joshua Street et al. Palm Springs, . CA 92262 (26) 621-290-002 WHITE SUN, INC. P. O. Box 1000 (27) 621-290-003 Rancho Mirage CA 92270 (28) 621-290-005 �.�! ✓ L C. A. 7527, 7540 / c SEC /7 /" 5 S. f2 6L PAGE 1. OF .4 • r . . n. • 1 7 8 ac41%s 8 9 /8 16 400' 3.62tAc. 7.52Ac.f e ' Q/ /j 6tAC \! 1 a � / '. s �G•► V"ss%Yi37" - _ - - c«��• 2 - /3 i 0 � .. - . 6.44tAc.� w �� •, .' � 14 DESERT�•�.. � ' � O .. '�� ® - •�.. 42.52Ac r ArE O[DNO. NEW NO. I 11.67 Act, C. V. C.W.D ?(�1 •'�•.. - - tc'G& ooq eN cle `7 I N 9 F9 not en, e,l 4, SAL.—' •'\•_ sr . • To ntl o13,014 -- ?yGy ` /v 0i0 0,5,01b �.a�s..i -<_ OrQ ••� - /8 2/71 007 017,018 � T�'9 C/�Y�'••�• 46.2OAc t . 1 020 /2.20Ae.I! •.�•..`••• GI AO. .47.49 Act, O .` \ i qy'Y ••�•• 40542 4/74 �� \ /4.57Ae-:-. i a a2G 132C.D3 .a2 =132i.99_ ,,xe IN AREA OUTLINED IN RED IS THE PROPERTY f DATA R/S 20138 IN QUESTION. NUMBERS CIRCLED IN RED 3416/ INDICATING PROPERTY OUTLINED IN GREEN 29158 REPRESENT THAT PROPERTY WITHIN 300 FT. w 3717 OF THE APPLICATION. THE NUMBER' S KEY TO THE LIST OF APPLICABLE PROPERTY OWNERS. ASSESSOR'S MAP BK. 62/ P6. 35 R/VERSIOE COUNTY, CALIF. T. C. A. /8 / '/B02 .'6 Q T. 5S. R 6E: S 2. SEC 7 PAGE 2 OF 4 ' . I I I 43 rd ill"g9 f , AVE s 1 =�,.. 4A0 0 0' II f 3 W 3 44 . y fir` 41 TE OLD NO. NEW NO. 4e T. 5 Y h r I 41 I 32 Nl A P 3' I 45 O SEC O 38 � SEE MAP i 4s I — — 44 t_h o V6 /B w A9 2I /9 20 ` 27 ASSESSOR'S MAP SK. 62/ PG. 36 RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIF. SJ _. .�✓ T. R. A. /7// PAGE 3 OF 4 17,56 i 9 'OR. .5W114 SEG7 R lV// SEC. /8 T5S. R•6E. . s : I )r yt -. •lee, _ .. .. .. .. ® 8/ If ry . . 5.67Ac.t rrf v s=✓,/c : POR.LOT/9 . 24A 1 /227ACf w O.43AC.>< �I2 .. /d l _ ✓ T.R.A. /739 COT_ Jt 7 + . 400. II POr.Par.1 .rg, C,C-/v�p I 2i 72 •1(r. I STpR*�ATE'9 / IO.OBQC.t- T`RA. />3gA/Tj�� B.56AC.f . tii4©1J /.B7 1 1 pr oSAAG NE[ I Q72a/ OR LOTZ ° ACt ® rnsi- � 32.22AC.f /4.62Ac.- 'cr �/ • 4° .z°. I O.//ACf' .M - ror y 0.09Ac.- 77 79 ao S OI POr.2 w MLT o r 0• f 0.04 J O SAG a hl 7 1>}' ., k .z. - LOT33 //.ZOAC. AC.-k z: I LOT ~� 3�'V.57 - 41. 7 o L 6.83Qc.N/. LOT 25 2 a ! \ :.°. 'DATE OL0NO. NENN Q b iI; 7L7 y a.7G o 87•. 7.7 POR. LOT /8 'qy - qr c+yyhy + _�4 [�o02AC.t . 7V., / z 3 e��I ^ _ x��' s• - f� © LOT/~ Y 37W c /9.3/AC 4- ¢' 4� zj x«'77e+s•_ 6 \.4 e s 1 v 4/ ?•' //.30AC. LOT3 ^3' _,° LOT /D 4ys•sr• r ''` 7A C Jtsf 0.27dL' 1a'i �' - y° c ,w4 " 3.9 C LOT O Iv 40 TR. 55 665 ,t ^ AC Q I F /.76 ` \ F(Lpe9 c w B• r 'l�' L.e• ?•o \° p+ ,° /LOJAG 7. ACf LOT// .? Q� 27 x zl`.'ai. - ••�� �j - N ' + %v r,. ° ^° LOT 22 �� '_ ® ,c ? a• 7 [7- 1[0-iz/ /+ .a I •: ,4, ? �. w I� \\i a 6p - e/./OAC.• °.Ir' r 015*W '\ .", 67 .3.5 ic.. 1.> /✓ ( az[r A ri ' �T9 ' GAS-fl4bNAS- -d7 [or v M 0.40AC. f 20.94AC.f 21 y 90' Lw0.70' 16, LOT/2 ^S -- +..-r// [0 3 a '°• , s,^ /.4^AC o I - JJe•J"..1 /9 •"'� T - _, "E`er" . O.OJAGLOT i°°' o �� r O' �' - o.aTAl w.:• ��°' G'v 73 LOT 26 � •'o� \ptt� t ,p7 a ej �LOT24 r ,^ LOT 28 - ...�! . z • J _ \ .Iv.e7• 4.//AC. i - 0.70 � LOTJ9 ® � 49 070AC. n ,. °• � 5 � I $ •'��4 /O/2 QL.. T�?,q . 74 /O 205T '� o O.//AC /^ ° o, v / ,� 1 :1wr,S°' j [ 6*• t> 735.88` �/ °}AC.f. CI �\ //./OAC. LOT /5 o . LOT / /.56AC ° l ova T&,Sr. Z POr.3 a �; 4 1 •„ �GO� LOT "' A rA�o Da y 6.69ACf JOO-9 z9,sT. 4- - 4.24 .G7A /3 - JS'° - sy,[°a nn7�' /ox?.• - E c Vn+1 T.RA./7// 0o6 D-55 OI b ® Jr ,c QQ } u p. /- OR. Q' LOT I\j Das Sa-r9 1^+ coraz = s- o "3.15AC n� a/4 ©6 a ° /8.4.9AC..�E O.16AC. LOT .: i �� r o 5 ri:.°s•c*'r Iw 1^ 0 7B 2 € 3.86.4C. o: oa ® LOT23 1 v /5 I� �LOT291 ^ 7.45 AC. $Q S • + �r 3/ LOT 30 v ,•Jj 33/ , • 1 . /OAc.- 227 7.39Ac.- �� AC. - 1' 1 / Ac.= - h 6,72AC.t '+. " o" LOT6 52V.VD' /6J.L6' 09 , ,w \\ Lorc 4T \• r1.,i - .� , 3.46 AC. „ C. , to JB • + Jr nr , x'°r` zs. ), 0.77AC. ti y 004P/A2- 2611}.7e' ,-.J' ToF•se`-.� /_effi i 0.45Ac.S -- \ DATA: OLO PLAT \ //NYAeAP 29 i ZB N.S. O2/89 O• R.S. 9/T/ PM 25/26-29 Porce/ Moo 7220 MB B7/29-3B TraCl NO. 725/-/ ASSESSOR'S MAP BK. 62/ PG,25 RIVERSIDE CDUNrY, CALIF. d /reG✓ T, C:.A. /80/ PAGE' 4 'OF . 4 . . " /7// N 2 SE"4 SEC. /8 T. 5S: R. 6E. . . • I 1 55 ss � 200 P PAR. 2 � J t 0 04 TE OGO NO. NEW NO: y h t, ti 9�7 rofu 60/ 1'p'h 75' 440624174 ( . SLR /O /2q13 � p I s/rt c /a CI s ¢ YI4 8.55ACf I Id m /q O I J4�111 34o /' /2176 0/8 20-2z X9'p9 98b /9.//Ac.i- ' MJ• _ 3V I7 /6 c I PAR. c . 31 b .. W . /161 - ll 57970 4174 I JQ• O e.94AC.�` 2.27t AC. O s.°oac.± 13 19 c PAR. 4 .t i06ACt Ih yl h J w a , 2b."lt' ISp.4p Soo f /-V N � • q� /J2JiJ /a/lJ 14p.24 M. " SS 55 q -- �- VIEW -- - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - --- - - R. PARR 1 32 33 DATA R/S 5//57 25 -B-80 R/S 5//57 ASSESSOR'S MAP BA 62/, PG. 29 RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIF. a national morztcacc & tana company December 7 , 1981 Mr . Patrick Conlon City of Palm Desert Department of Building & Safety 45275 Prickly Pear- Lane Palm Desert , CA . 92260 RE : Permit Request Phase 29 , Tract 12202 MONTEREY COUNTRY CLUB Dear Mr . Conlon : As discussed with you and Mr . Palimino on this date , National Mortgage & Lan'd Company is requesting permits for 34 condominium units to be built in Phase 29 of Tract 12202 , Monterey Country Club . As these condominium units are t�e same floor plans as the plans of record and.,-on file with the City of Palm Desert , no building pla'hs are being submitted . Please call the cost of the permits by Plan to our office for processing of ,the fees . A construction sequence . sheet is enclosed for your use to figure the required !permits . Thank you for processing our permits in a timely manner . Very truly yours , ohn I si Fcgier Vice President cc : Gary E . B 8 Herbert A . GawC7DESERT enclosure : JLB : jh 3 ON FORM GY f?l cJ o_ 7 8rr Da4a 41-500 MONTEREY AVENUE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 • (714) 568-1843 CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE CONDOMINIUMS MONTEREY COUNTRY CLUB PALM DESERT , CA 92260 Prepared 4-20-79 GROUP Phase Final Revised 5- 13-81 Tract 12202 34 Units Clay Tile Roofs BLDG . BLDG . UNIT PLAN NO . ELEV . NO . NO . STREET ADDRESS Swimming Pool & Spa #31 . 219%Seville Circle 1 4APL 1088 3000PR 219 Seville Circle 1089 c00R 217 Seville Circle <. 1090 300 215 Seville Circle 1091, 3000 213 Seville Circle 2 4B 1092 3000R 211 Seville Circle 1093 30OR 209 Seville Circle 1094 300 207 Seville Circle 1095 3000 205 Seville Circle 3 1B 1096 30R 203 Seville Circle 1097 20R 201 Seville Circle 1098 20 199 Seville Circle 109.9 30 197 Seville Circle 4 IA 1100 30R 195 Seville Circle 1101 20R 193 Seville Circle 1102 ;� 20 191 Seville Circle 1. 103 30 189 Seville Circle 5 3APRl' . 1104 30R 187 Seville Circle 1105 20OR 185 Seville Circle 1106 200 183 Seville Circle 1107 30 OOP 181 Seville Circle Swimming Pool & Spa #32 1842 Seville Circle 6 5APL 1108 30PR 186 Seville Circle 1109 30OR 188 Seville Circle 1110 300 190 Seville Circle 1111 20 192 Seville Circle 1112 30 194 Seville Circle 7 4A 1113 3000R 196 Seville Circle 1114 30OR 198 Seville Circle 1115 300 . 200 Seville Circle 1116 3000 202 Seville Circle 8 5BPR 1117 30R 204 Seville Circle 1118 30OR 206 Seville Circle 1119 300 208 Seville Circle 1120 20 210 Seville Circle 1121 30P 212 Seville Circle Plan 20 30 30P 200 300 3000 3000P = 34 Units M i x 6 7. 2 2 10 5 �— B1dg . lA 1B 3APR 4A 4APL 4B 5APL 5BPR Mix _ 8 Bldgs . 1 1 1 7 1 1 1 1 29 �P�t. 4r���r�lrv�rrr�errt�l �?r�/jr,P� � ��xofxZ�tte� �cYS,ea Cafeyory: CO/✓/Mt'•/eGIAL _ qqC me and Cocafion Case� me andL'ocafion $ G N.E. Coe, /q+ees�.ir '� Ee/ SEo 4o c- c 4Z c c SC �7 ` GL.4�vE 04.D 4 S-O C C l R,4 s c a S/ C. EL ASEa 52 � S4 � SSc E2G 3`aG S� c ,0ept. of 6=ronmenhal c5erplee5 � �iAxAfXZ�it,� Lc�S,C� caf��ry: �o•h M E,e c.,a t Case ./Mime and lxcallon Case lfo'. Aa'me and ,Cocaflon *IAWl ET ,9Ser-r i //W //, SEE "PRIO46 zo <! .ToF C,+04yVYoG GARAF,�V 3 c s/�on �y zZ �/ Ro. A Aoe 7— Ale q KosPi 7 4 L S c, r,_ 3 2r A,rE2 k z 4- c C-</e 3 rE/t 41V0&2 sue; /wr 5 , /A• L.Or /9 PALIh ✓1 19 PEA 3AM � S /1 \/ 3AN / L LLE t� .Woa,..E OFF,cE 7 2W6,9Rr LA.e gVAA1 ? (o G p MSCORM ELK /3L.d f7 6 C L•oT 2� EL �ASEo F3LK ? �7 �. � 14GKS !1/42)/,V6 9c a.8c - PiFLM.r Tc J�IAICS /Q G PN A S E 3 �j C.. COMMC.eG,R<. � oW �y I/L ��s o4�-0o3�oox,eosooc,ve7 ., 3o c Z71046 F,eavT CA?vbejL 1—auAr2,A4L 64.AS5 f ALJ,n /Z- 75-2.2 /// 4z7-/ 2-ova9. 3 G SEGJ.E ,TyI �AG/ FIC ..D AN k, 1-c 33 c /Se 34 C LA -4 v Z4,y Ao Q, C 17C 36 e i_ c . c rz, cor��Ee �o� ,er p 3 L EL pASEo Sj^A L ANE i DESERT SQUIRE RANCH GOLF AND TENNIS CLUB AND THE ENVIRONMENT WEBB ENBINEEBINB,INC. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY DESERT SQUIRE RANCH GOLF AND TENNIS CLUB OCTO.BER 19� 1972 i 7 �� 1ILLLLJJJJIIllII J 2"� (97? RIVERSIDE COUNTY ALBERT A. WEBB, President PLANNING COMMISSION JOHN L. SANBORN, Vice President 8 General Manager ARTHUR H.WEBB,Secretary CIVIL ENGINEERING ❑ 1:1.618 EAST SUNNY DUNES ROAD ❑ ❑ PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA 92262 ❑ ❑ TELEPHONE (714) 325-2245 TABLE OF CONTENTS I . INTRODUCTION A . FUNCTION OF REPORT 1 B. AREA OF IMPACT 1 C . DEVELOPER AND CONSULTANTS 2 D. THE PROJECT 3 1 . Location 3 2 . Scope 3 3 . Preliminary Master Plan 7 4. Phasing 7 E. BACKGROUND INFORMATION 8 II . 'ANALYSIS OF THE ENVIRONMENT A . AIR QUALITY 10 1 . Climatic Conditions 10 2 . Pollution 12 3 . Odor 15 4. Clarity 17 B . WATER 18 1 . Quantity 18 Groundwater 18 Other Sources 19 2 . Quality 23 Local 23 Imported 24 Irrigation 25 Recharge 25 C . NOISE 26. 1 . Residential 26 2. Recreation 30 3 . Vehicular Movement 33 4. Open Space 34 5 . Construction and Maintenance 34 D . GEOGRAPHY AND GEOLOGY 35 E. COMMUNITY RESOURCES 38 1 . Utilities 38 F Electric 38 Gas 39 Communications 41 Water 42 Fire Protection 42 Transportation and Roads 43 Sewage Disposal 44 . Solid Waste Disposal 46 2 . Public Services 47 Flood Protection 47 Parks 48 Schools 48 Police 50 Mail 52 Health 52 3 . Economic 54 Trade 54 Taxes 54 Property Values 54 F. HABITAT 54. 1 . Human 54 Land Use 54 Development Standards 55 2 . i^lildli.fe 56 Habitats and Migration 56 Life Zones and Vegetation 57 Species 60 3 • Archaeology 60 G. LAND USE 61 e 1 . Compatibility 61 Quality 61 Sightlines 61 Community Identity 62 2 . Residential 62 Dispersion 62 Vistas 63 Beautification 64 Security 64 3 . Recreational 65 Golf Course and Club Complex 65 Tennis Complex 66 Arts and Crafts Center 66 Equestrian Center 66 Commercial 66 H. ECONOMIC 67 1. Selling Price 67 2 . Income of Purchasers 68 3 . Influence on the Economy 71 4. Development Effect on Community Taxes 78 5 . The Economy of Scale 88 III . ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT A . STATEMENT 90 B. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT PLAN 91 C . CONFORMANCE WITH EXISTING PLANS 92 D. IMPACT AREA PHASES 93 1 . Initial 93 2. Intermediate 94 3 . Long Range 95 E. REGULATIONS FOR IMPACT REDUCTION 96 1 . Construction Phase Control 96 Noise 96 Vehicular Movement 96 Dust 96 Surface Runoff 96 Sanitation 97 Safety 97 Archaeological 97 Visual 97 Wildlife 97 Services 97 2 . Long Range Control 98 Advance Planning 98 Recreation Facilities 98 Utilities 98 Timing 98 F. ADVERSE REACTION TO THE PROJECT 99 1 . Direct Objections 99 2. General Concern 99 G. PROBABLE LONG RANGE BENEFICIAL IMPACT 100 H. ALTERNATIVES 103 1 . Development Concept 103 2 . Utilities and Services 103 General Services 103 Water 104 .Sewage 104 Roads 105 Police 105 Schools 105 Goods and Services 106 Habitat 106 Parks 106 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY FOR DESERT SQUIRE RANCH GOLF AND TENNIS CLUB I . INTRODUCTION A . FUNCTION OF REPORT This report is intended to serve as the basis for compliance with the California State Environmental Quality Act . It will also pro- vide factual information for the needs of the jurisdictional authority in order to evaluate the impact of the Desert Squire Ranch Golf and Tennis Club project upon the regional, local and neighborhood communities. B . AREA OF IMPACT ( See Exhibit A) 1 . Jurisdictional: County of Riverside, California 2 . Regional: Upper Coachella Valley from Palm Springs Southeast to Indio. 3 Local: That portion of the upper Coachella Valley generally known as the communities of Palm Desert and Rancho Mirage, bounded on the North by Interstate 10, on the South by the foothills of the San Jacinto - Santa Rosa mountain range, on the West by the community of Rancho Mirage and on the East by the City of Indian Wells . ( 1) 4. Neighborhood: The immediate adjacent area within one-half (1/2) mile of the external boundaries of the project . C . DEVELOPER AND CONSULTANTS 1 . Developer: Desert Squire Ranch Golf and Tennis Club 383 So. Palm Canyon Drive Palm Springs, California 92262 Principal: Orrin R. Homme, General Partner Project Manager: 0. Michael Homme 2 . Consultants: Engineering: Webb Engineering, Inc. 618 Sunny Dunes Road Palm Springs, California 92262 Planning and Architectural: James Barg, A.I .A . 31882 Camino Capistrano Suite 105A San Juan Capistrano, Calif. 92675 Marketing: Woodpecker Development Company P . 0. Box 258 Palm Desert, California 92260 Accounting: Robert McCulloch, C.P.A. 1007 So. Palm Canyon Drive Palm Springs, California 92262 (2) Legal: John McCullough Schlesinger, Schlecht, & McCullough 383 So. Palm Canyon Drive Palm Springs, California 92262 D. THE PROJECT 1. Location: The property is situated in Southern California in the upper Coachella Valley near the center of Riverside County ( see Exhibit B) , and lies approximately. one and one-half miles directly North of the intersection of State Highway 111 and Highway 74 in the unincorporated community of Palm Desert . The project occupies portions of Sections 8 and 17, Township 5 South, Range 6, S.B.B. & M. , which lie northerly of the Udhitewater River Storm Channel. ( See Exhibit C) All lands are to be controlled and developed by Desert Squire Ranch Golf and Tennis Club, a California Limited Partnership. Approximately 225 acres are fee title lands. - The project is within the Cove Communities St udo;Areea . ( See Exhibit ID) . 2 . Scope: The Desert Squire Ranch property encompasses approximately ?9S angaG. of which 80% will be allocated_ exclusively for use (3) f as permanent open space and recreation. The balance of the property will be developed for residential purposes, including all amenities and conveniences accessory thereto, primarily under the Planned Residential Development (PRD) concept . ( See Exhibit E) . In accordance with the Cove Communities General Plan and the Monterey Avenue Specific Plan, the County and the developer vIl111:=+'r.cins rur-t a new major highway along the westerly boundary �y�y A ��' orooerty wwhich d major afford the ma 'o cess to the pro- Vp 1 1 p i ���i GRa+ -msNO 4;gect from the North and South . This roadway will be built to -Cpunty standards and dedicated to public use. It will serve i--; as the primary access from the property to downtown Palm Desert . Capacity of this major highway will exceed the 1990 traffic volume projections of the Preliminary Cove Communities General Plan . ( See Exhibits F1 and F2) . The project will consist of approximately 1,071 residential dwelling units with -a .variety of different types and styles. Clustered single and two story units are integrated with the golf course and lakes throughout most of the project . A "Guest Village" will be located just East of the golf clubhouse . "Garden Apartments" will be constructed on the Southwestern portion of the property. The "Ranch Trading Post" immediately South of the main entrance will afford convenience commercial for residents of the development . (4) All structures are designed with a "western ranch" theme, mission tile roofs, muted natural desert colors and an abun- dance of landscaping to soften, blend, and produce a project compatible with the community area . The gross density of the entire project is 4.7 units per acre. The density of specific areas within the project is as follows: PHASE DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE I 2 .6 II 4.0 III 2.4 IV 3 .2 V 11.2 A high degree of open space and substantial recreational facilities are being provided by the developer. Swimming pools will be provided throughout the project at a ratio of approximately one per 40 - 50 living units. A centrally located golf clubhouse will serve an 18 hole, 6,900 yard course. An arts and crafts center is also featured . A separate tennis complex will provide 17 courts designed and constructed to championship specifications and served by a central clubhouse. ( 5) An equestrian center, complete with stables, corrals, tack rooms and arena, will be provided at the Southeast corner, adjacent to the Storm Channel, a major valley equestrian route. Residential open space will be centrally landscaped to enhance living conditions and appearance. Additional open space (in- cluding several large, fish stocked lakes) will be provided for wildlife habitat, buffer zones, and general relaxation and aesthetic purposes . All lot purchasers automatically become eligible for member- ship in the golf and tennis club and all other amenities . Security will be provided by attractive enclosures with gated entrances and private security surveillance. A closed circuit TV system is being considered throughout the public areas . Radar monitoring of the perimeter wall is indicated . All internal roads, recreational facilities, landscaping and open space will be controlled and maintained by a private homeowner's association. Domestic water will be provided by the Coachella Valley County Water District . Irrigation water will be developed from groundwater sources separately. This system will be designed to act as an additional fire prevention and fighting facility. A sanitary sewer collection system and lateral lines will be provided by the developer. The major trunk line for the (6) entire surrounding area currently runs through the project and along its western boundary to the new Cook Street Sewage Treatment Plant, approximately 2 miles East of the project . This utility is owned, operated and maintained by the Coachella Valley County Water District . The trunk is oversized to include capacity for future users. 3 . Preliminary Master Plan: 'The Preliminary Master Plan (See Exhibit E) is consistent with the Riverside County Preliminary Cove Communities General Plan. (See Exhibits Gl, G2 and G3) . It conforms with the existing underlying. zoning. ( See Exhibit H) . 4. Phasing: Development is contemplated to take place over a ten year period. Straight line projections estimate construction of approximately 110 living units per year. Anticipated variations would range from 40 to 200 units per year, depending upon economic pressures and market changes. The construction pro- gram will adhere to the conditions as set forth under the Conditional Use Permit (C.U.P. ) approved by Riverside County, u ( See Exhibit I) , on a preliminary basis. Phase I will consist of constructing 140 units on 54 acres. The initial grading is estimated to begin in the winter of 1972 . (7) . Development will also include the 18 hole regulation golf course and the first phase of the golf and tennis clubhouse (proshops) , and installation of 4 tennis courts. (See Exhibit J) • Phase II will consist of approximately 149 residential dwell- ings on 37 acres, completion of the golf and tennis clubhouse and completion of the equestrian center, plus 4 tennis courts. Phase III will consist of approximately 118 units on 48 acres, plus 3 tennis courts . Phase IV will consist of approximately 124 units on 39 acres, plus the arts and crafts center and 6 tennis courts. Phase V will consist of approximately 540 units on 48 acres, plus the trading post . E. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: While many national and international sources stand as perpetual reference to environmental considerations, the decision to utilize local expertise and opinion is judged to best meet the need for specific information regarding impact of this project . Local sources of information include personal interviews conducted by the developer and consultants, previously mentioned, since January 1, 1972, together with research of agency reports and other bibliography related to possible local and regional impact. (8) Additional source information is provided through the extensive personal knowledge of the local and regional conditions by the developer and consultants, together with vast file data and long- time experience with land development projects of a similar nature. A bibliography and list of references is contained in The Appendix section of this report. (9) II . ANALYSIS OF THE ENVIRONMENT A . AIR QUALITY 1. Climatic Conditions: The area under study is classified as having a very and desert climate, with high temperatures and scant erratic rain- fall averaging 3 .7 inches per year at Indio. Rainfall in the Cove Communities generally averages about 3 1/2 inches annually at the valley floor. Increased rainfall is experienced at higher elevations toward the adjacent moun- tains . As the evaporation in this type of climate characteris- tically exceeds the precipitation, there is no significant surface water in the Coachella Valley with the exception of the Salton Sea into which all valley drainage flows. Storms are experienced infrequently and are usually of relatively short duration. During certain storms of relatively high in- tensity and a short duration, runoff from the mountains transports rock, small trees, sand, shrubs and silt down the canyons. On these occasions erosion and deposition take place in the canyons and on the valley floor. Subsequent damage is sometimes experienced by those who have built in unprotected areas. A severe storm was recorded at Indio, California on September 24, 1939 when 6.45 inches of rain fell in an eight hour period . (10) !i Deposition of material at the mouths of the canyons occur in the form of alluvial fans on a flat gradient valley. A portion of the storm water infiltrates into the ground where it eventually percolates to the deep groundwater reservoir. Although the Coachella Valley normally experiences warm, tran- quil northwesterly breezes, it is subject to seasonal north- westerly winds which in the spring months may exceed thirty miles per hour. These winds are the primary cause of the shifting aeolian sand deposits immediately North of Palm Desert . They also account for the dissemination of much plant seed throughout the desert region. One of the most important environmental influences on community living in the general area is the high proportion of sunny days per annum and the warm to hot daytime temperatures. Characteristically some cloud formations develop as orographic condensation at the western slopes of the San Jacinto Mountains when moist air masses move easterly from the ocean, and largely disappear on the leeward desert slopes. Some light cloud formations exist over the general valley area, but seldom of sufficient mass to exclude sunshine. Average monthly precipi- tation (76 years) and temperature (34 years) records for Palm Springs are given in the table on the following page. (11) TEMPERATURE AND PRECIPITATION AT PALM SPRINGS Temperature (OF) Precipitation Average Max. Average Min. Inches Jan. 1..05 69 40 Feb . 1.21 77 45 Mar. .63 79 47 Apr. .22 84 51 May .05 94 59 Jun. .02 99 64 Jul. .19 109 73 Aug. .25 108 75 Sep. .27 101 66 Oct.. .29 95 59 Nov. .38 78 49 Dec . 1.41 68 40 Source: U.S. Department of Commerce, Weather Bureau Publications. 2. Pollution: The general quality of air is clean and the quantities of air contamination from local transportation sources are relatively low. Contamination from local stationary sources is almost nil. Little or no air pollution is created by incineration of non-agricultural processes. Occasionally some light (12) contamination is created by agricultural burning. In combi- nation with abundant sunshine, the exceptionally fresh and clean air is one of the major attractions of this area. (See Exhibits K1, K2 and K3) . The Desert Squire Ranch Project is orientated to serve the market demand for this type of climate. The air basin is subject to contamination in the summer months by polluted air from the general Los Angeles basin. Charac- teristic local thermal low pressures caused by the summer desert heat draw surface level air masses and accompanying pollutants from adjacent areas, principally through the San Gorgonio Pass. The phenomenon may be witnessed on many clear summer afternoons from almost any point in the valley. Air pollution concerns anticipate the statewide requirements for grossly reduced emissions from transportation sources in the near future will provide relief from this external source of air pollution. The Air Pollution Control District of Riverside County indicates that potential pollution sources from the Desert Squire Ranch area include: 1) dwelling heating; 2) incineration; 3) effect of construction during the construction process; 4) transpor- tation and 5) noise; in the order given, will have impact substantially as follows: a . Heating - Natural ga s heating, if used is a very g g, clean fuel which minimizes air pollution. Since most of the (13) project consists of single family dwelling units with not more than four family apartments, there would be little restrictions with regard to heating. b. Incineration - This should not be permitted on the project' unless within a three-chamber incinerator. Garbage service normally takes away all combustible wastes to an area remote from the project, thereby elimi- nating the need for incineration in the proposed site. c. Construction - During the course of development, the raising of fine dust and sand due to grading and moving of earth can be avoided or minimized by adequate watering of the soils in accordance with standards of the Air Pollution Control District. d . Transportation - Major sources of air pollution are 90% transportation and 10% stationary. e. Noise - The Air Pollution Control District suggests that the outline of a proposed noise pollution ordinance be considered, relative to the proposed development. With regard to the above items, the developer proposes to: a . Use natural gas heat for dwellings throughout the entire Desert Squire Ranch area. b . Enter into an agreement with Palm Desert Disposal, Inc. , ( 14) to provide garbage and trash service for the develop- ment . These materials will be disposed of at the Edom Hill Riverside County Refuse Disposal Site on Old Varner Road, approximately 12 miles North of the Desert Squire Ranch development . c . Provide adequate watering of soils during construction as required by Standards of the Air Pollution Control District . d . Contamination caused by transportation will not have undue impact on air pollution due to the nature of the proposed development . California law is progressively requiring lower automobile emissions consistent with improved controls from federal laws: "By 1976 federal standards will require that auto- mobile gases have only one tenth the .emissions permitted in the 1970 models. . .There are six major pollutants which the 1970 amendments to the Clean Air Act is designed to control: sulfur oxides,. particulates, photochemical oxidants, hydrocarbons, nitrogen oxides and carbon monoxide. . . . " e. To implement and control noise pollution in accordance with proposed noise pollution ordinance. 3 . Odor: Under normal conditions, the great majority of pollutants (15) discharged into the desert air are from transportation sources (Exhibits Kl, Kz and K3) . The extremely low ratio of local motor vehicle emissions to the enormous desert, combined with the prevalent winds and temperature differentials between the desert slopes,, of the mountains and the western slopes, tend to dilute vehicular emissions, thereby minimizing pollution odors. An equestrian center with corrals and stables will be constructed at the Southeastern corner of the project adjacent to the Whitewater River Channel. This channel extends from the spreading grounds North of Palm Springs to the Salton Sea and is the major equestrian route through the Valley. The center will be operated by a professional manager. The most modern techniques of odor and fly control will be utilized, including periodic fertilizer removal. All potential nuisance vectors will be eliminated or minimized in keeping with the balance of the project quality. No other significant source of pollution in the project contributes to odors. Under these conditions, environmental impact from odors in the area will be of little consequence. In the area of Indio under conditions of static air and certain other weather conditions, pollutants have reached maximums allowable and smog alerts have been issued. This condition has been attributable chiefly to smog over-flow from the western county areas and from vehicular emissions. Indio is the chief source of stationary emissions in the general (16) area, and is located twelve miles East of the study area, thereby having little affect in the project area. For all emissions produced by sources within Riverside County juris- diction, and stationary sources of pollution, controlled .monitoring and enforcement are in effect . 4• Clarity: Existing sources of air pollution on the project site are confined to potential airborne particles of sand and dust generated by high winds. This source is considered negligible and temporary in light of the proposed golf course as a beginning phase of the project and due to the adjacent plantings and windbreaks. The Cove Communities have been and are continuing to be concerned with ways and means to reduce sand blow and airborne dust from the general area. The City of Palm Springs and the County of Riverside have been researching for some effective methods of reducing the sand and dust problem. A 'Blow Sand District ' is presently under consideration for the Valley. It has been observed that a distinctly measurable and trace- able side effect to the rising level of residential develop- ment in the general Cove Communities area is a gradual reduction in the quantities of blowsand and dust. . Observation of the many projects reaching out from the coves to the desert flatlands indicates that golf courses, streets, fences, (17) landscaping and structures are reducing the areas that release sands to the wind. As development continues, the sand and dust problem is being reduced in those areas sheltered by this outward moving construction. The relatively minor amount of suspended dust that affects the study area will continue to reduce as popu- lation in the general area increases. It is expected that with regard to sand and dust, air clarity will improve with development growth. B. WATER 1. Quantity: Water in the arid West is of paramount importance and is the first requisite to the existence of all life. The Upper Coachella Valley is a 250 square mile area in Riverside County, generally the water supply area for the proposed development . A portion of this valley is the general region upon which the project will have an impact. Groundwater - The basic complex of the Coachella Valley consists of the consolidated undifferentiated granitic intrusive and metamorphic rocks of Precambrian and Tertiary age. These consolidated rocks contain little or no water and generally form a "no flow" boundary. Four major groundwater sub-basins exist in this area, known as: Desert Hot Springs, Garnet Hill, ( 18) The Mission Creek, and Whitewater River sub-basins. The last named is the largest and most significant aquifer. Near the southern boundary of this aquifer an imaginary boundary was established from Point Happy Northeast to the San Bernardino Mountains. Northwest of this boundary, water levels have been declining, while Southeast of this boundary, water levels have been rising since 1949. Groundwater Northwest of the boundary is the major source of irrigation water for the proposed project . Groundwater generally flows from the recharge areas of the surrounding mountain toward the Southeast through the center of the Valley to the Salton Sea. The groundwater basin in the Coachella Valley was essentially unaffected by mans, activities until about 1945 when groundwater pumping caused the water levels to begin falling. The Palm Springs area has had the largest water level decline of approximately 75 feet since 1936. The other three sub-basins have experienced re- latively minor development with resulting lesser water level declines, ranging from 5 to 15 feet since 1936. In the Point Happy area a decline of about 2 feet per year continued through 1949. Surface Water - There is no significant surface water source in the Coachella Valley. Other Sources - The two primary agencies responsible for (19) supplying water to the area located above the Point Happy San Bernardino mountain boundary are the Desert Water Agency (DWA) and the Coachella Valley County Water District. (CVCWD) . Since both are cognizant of the gradually diminishing ground- water supply, they contracted with the State of California to purchase water imported from Northern California through the California Aqueduct . This purchase is due to begin in the latter part of 1972 . The DWA and the CVCWD agreed that their entitlements to California Aqueduct water may be traded with the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California in exchange for Colorado River water from the Colorado River Aqueduct . This water may be artifically recharged into the Upper Coachella Valley groundwater basin. The Windy Point - Whitewater River area is the most logical point to recharge the Colorado River water. Percolation rates of 2 to 4 acre feet per acre, per day are probable. Mr. Lowell Weeks, Chief Engineer and General Manager of the Coachella Valley County Water District has stated that: "On May 29, 1963 an agreement was executed between the State of California, Department of Water Resources and the Coachella County Water District for 23,100 acre feet of water per year on a perpetual term to be delivered to the Whitewater River Channel for distribution into the underground reservoir. " (20) Quantities of water under the annual entitlements of the DWA and the CVCWD begin at 13,200 acre feet in 1972. This in- creases to a total of 61,200 acre feet in 1990 and thereafter. These quantities are more than adequate to recharge the Upper Coachella Valley sub-basin according to the analog model information. To assist the DWA and the CVCWD in their water management decisions, a cooperative agreement was made with the U.S. Geological Survey to provide answers to the following vital questions: a'. Where and how can imported water from the Colorado River be most efficiently introduced to recharge the Upper Coachella Valley groundwater system? b. What are the patterns of groundwater movement under the influence of extractions and recharge? c . How would recharging water from the Colorado River affect the native groundwater? In order to answer these questions, the geohydrologic framework of the groundwater system was analyzed using an analog model constructed to simulate the groundwater system of the Upper Coachella Valley for the period 1936 to 1967. After the model was constructed and verified, it was used to predict the effects of artificial recharge of the Colorado River water on the Upper Coachella Valley. Delivery of Colorado River water (21) through the Coachella Canal was initiated in 1949. Since 1949 the water levels in the Point Happy area have been rising and by 1967 were above their 1936 levels. The report qualified the findings of the analog model as follows: "The model was considered verified when the water level changes generated by the model for any given time period matched the actual water level changes. Care was taken not to apply unrealistic hydrologic stresses to the model to force water levels to match. Groundwater extractions were calculated . . .every effort was made to calculate pumpage accurately - - - many possibilities for error do occur in this type of compilation; however, considering the accuracy of the approximations in a regional model analysis, the pumpage calculations are reasonable and the most accurate available. " The obvious conclusion that may be drawn from this data is that adequate recharge capacity has been provided for the Upper Coachella Valley area for a time period extending at least to the year 2000. The proposed development will create a demand for water use beginning in 1973 , rising to an ultimate demand for the project approximately 1983 . The analog report indicates that the effects of the water recharge program will begin to resupply,' (22) 9 the groundwater in the Palm Desert area before ultimate de- mand of the development is reached . Under "Summary and Conclusions", page 81 of the report, it is noted that the total groundwater depletion for the entire Upper Coachella Valley for 1936 to 1967 was about 600,000 acre feet, an average decrease of about 25,000 acre feet per year since 1945 . The Windy Point - Whitewater River area was recommended as the recharge input location as it was the best site for percolation rates with the best spreading potential. It also had the economic advantage of being close to the Colorado River Aqueduct . The analog model projected pumping for the period 1968 - 2000 and the recharge requirement for the same period . The model produced a 20 foot water level increase at Windy Point by 1980; a 130 foot increase by 1990 and a 200 foot increase by the year 2000. The model analysis indicated that the proposed quantities of recharge will beneficially affect the groundwater system to Palm Desert by 1980 and to Point Happy by 1990. 2 . Quality: Local - The report on .the analog study states: "On the basis of the available analyses, it is probable that the quality of native groundwater in the Whitewater River sub-basin after recharge will be, to a first approximation, (23) proportional to the ratio in which the quantity of recharge and the quantity of native groundwater are mixed. The quality of the recharge water will probably not be greatly changed by any ion exchange phenomenon. However, much data is needed to make any reliable estimate on the effects of the imported water. " From a general health standpoint, it appears unlikely that any impairment will occur inasmuch as a substantial portion of the Southern California population is now and has been using Colorado River water for years. Proportions of admixture by (local) natural groundwater in the Coachella Valley with recharge water from the Colorado River will still provide residents of the Coachella Valley with a quality of water superior to that now available to millions of people in Southern California . Mr. Weeks has stated : "Well water qualities can and do vary from 200 ppm to 750 ppm in a horizontal distance of one fourth of a mile. " Imported - From the analog report : "Colorado River water presently has a dissolved solids con- tent of about 750 mg/l. Whitewater River water contains about 200 mg/l dissolved solids. Water extracted from the main aquifer in the Palm Springs area has about 300 mg/1 dissolved solids. " It does not appear that any appreciable change to quality will (24) occur with the advent of Colorado River as a domestic supply source. Irrigation - Mr. Weeks has stated: "Approximately one half million acre feet of water is im- ported from the Colorado River annually and that ground- water recharge in the Coachella Valley from this source is substantial: The overall sub-basin in the valley is i benefited by this source. From years of experience, I have observed no significant affect to groundwater quality resulting from existing sanitary waste disposal in the Palm Desert area . " Mr. Arthur Swajian, executive director of the State Regional Water Quality Control Board #7, has indicated that pesticides, fungicides, fertilizers and other chemicals used on golf courses and landscaped areas during irrigation are normally quite light ; only sufficient to achieve the effect, and has a negligible affect on the groundwater. Recharge - Mr. Swajian has indicated that in the Cove Communi- ties, domestic water use generally increases the solids content to approximately 300 mg. per liter. This increase applies to water that ultimately filters down into the subterranean water streams to become a part of the resupply and is essentially caused by use of septic tanks. Inasmuch as' sanitary sewers are to be installed in this development , no impact as to water I (25) i quality is expected from a septic tank source and the relative groundwater recharge quality is improved . Mr. Swajian has also indicated that the installation and use of sanitary sewers as proposed by the developer will have a substantially beneficial impact upon the community because no discharge of untreated effluent will occur in the locality. For recharge resulting from imported irrigation water see previous Section under Irrigation. In view of the high dilution of ground water recharge from irrigation sources, it is believed that ground water quality will not change significantly from that now existing. Develop- ment environmental impact appears negligible. C . NOISE 1. Residential: "The health, safety and welfare and an individualts right to use and enjoy an area, involves the adequate consideration of noise. To provide a quiet atmosphere is an important environ- mental objective in any development today. " These are the thoughts of the planning architect at an interview regarding the subject of considerations for noise control. The Desert Squire Ranch Project is residential in character. This study will review noise potential from'a general resi- dential area, having an average residential density of five (26) families per' acre (medium density) . Total area to be developed comprises approximately 225 acres with a maximum of 1,071 dwelling units. Since the area of highest density is not directly interspersed with the large open space formed by the golf courses, this location can be considered to be the zone of highest noise potential. In only relatively recent times have regulatory bodies had any significant awareness of the importance of noise. River- side County does not, at this time, have any official standards for regulation of this aspect of Community growth. This study will refer to a preliminary draft of a proposed ordi- nance governing noise in Riverside County. The proposed Ordinance designates 'Noise Areas' in four zones: Zone I . R-1 uses through and including R-5 and R-T Zone II . Commercial Zones, A and M Zones Zone III . I-P, M-4, W-2, W-2M Zones Zone IV. Industrial Zones M-2, M-R and M-R-A Noise Performances Standards 'are proposed for each of the above zones. Since the proposed development is of a type that will encompass the lower density of Noise Zone No. I, noise perfor- mance standards of the proposed ordinance will be considered for this zone only. In general, noise levels are to be (27) controlled below 5dbA (decibels weighted) . Certain noise sources to be regulated are not inherent in the physical design or the improvements to be constructed. They are elements generally beyond the control of any development planning. Examples of these potential noise sources are: touring sound trucks, parades, sirens, aircraft, and the like. Because the proposed project will have enclosed private streets with guarded entrance gates, most of the vehicular sound generated elements not usually controllable by development planning may be excluded from this project . Elements of potential excessive noise generation to be con- sidered with the proposed project are: radios, television sets, musical instruments, drums or other percussion instru- ments, animals or fowl, air conditioning units, equipment and vehicles relating to the original construction work, subsequently with emergency repair, additions and improvements and private motor vehicles. Necessary elements to be considered for optimum acoustic design are: 1. Acoustical environment. 2. Layout and arrangement or shapes. 3 • Room shape. 4. Reflecting surfaces. 5 . Vibration isolation. ( 28) 6. Sound isolation. 7. Sound absorption. By employing sound planning practices the acoustical environ- ment can be controlled . The locating of like uses in the same area removes the possibility of the heavier noise sources from becoming a problem. In the layout and arrangement of units, consideration has been given to the grouping of similar functions. An example would be the groupings of carports with carports, living rooms with living rooms, bedrooms with bedrooms, etc. Where possible, closets, corridors and courts have been used as buffers between areas of different noise levels. Consideration has been given to controlling the shape of rooms so as to eliminate excessive parallel walls which cause rever- beration. The appropriate dimension and proportion of spaces has been considered. The smallest volume consistent with the function of the room has been developed to reduce noise. Building surfaces and textures have been selected to reduce sound reflection, to absorb or flatten potential noise sources. All building equipment will be installed under accepted con- struction standards, in regard to the isolation of machine noise and vibration. Air conditioning compressors will be located in such a manner and will be buffered with garden walls (29) and landscaping to reduce the noise generated from this source. Good construction practices for common walls will be incor- porated in the design of this development . Area separation walls will be incorporated between units. By using separate sill plates, air spaces and insulation, an adequate soundwall can be developed between units. Generally, sound absorption in a residence is accomplished, not by the building, but by the items placed in it, such as, carpet, drapes, furniture and various ceiling treatments. In a development of this nature it is assumed that the items mentioned above will be fairly standard throughout the project . 2 . Recreation: The legal nature of the proposed project will be a Planned Residential Development (PRD) with a Homeowner's Association responsible for the operation and maintenance of the recrea- tional facilities, open spaces, fences, streets, roofs and sidewalls of the dwelling units . This type of residential project is most suited for the control of such noise generating elements. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (C .C. & R. 's) , which will be a part of the deeds of title conveyance, grants certain duties and responsibilities for the operation of the project to the Homeowner's Association. Most of the conditions (30) of ownership imposed by C .C . & R. 's regulate the specific types of noise source most likely to create noise levels above the proposed Ordinance Standards. Outdoor noise sources in this development could be generated by the many different recreational amenities which will be provided . These sources could vary from noise generated by use of swimming pools in the common areas, activities of lawn sports and tennis, to noise generated by play on the golf course. Noise abatement in the swimming and therapy pool areas will be accomplished by depressing the pools and deck, and then surround- ing them with landscape mounding and plant material. This will vertically deflect sound waves that are generated at the water level , rather than on horizontal direction toward the units . Noise generated on the golf course is minimal, due to the nature of the game being played on a vast open landscaped area . Noise generated by play on the tennis courts again will be minimal due to the nature of the game . Special provisions Will sink the courts approximately 3 feet below grade and surround them with a heavy landscape buffer to reduce and absorb noise that emanates from the playing surface. The C.C . & R. 's provide that the residential premises and the recreational premises facilities are for the use and enjoyment (31) of owners, guests or others invited, thereby excluding the passage of the general public through the residential area. Community swimming pools will be located in the center of large green areas screened from adjacent structures by extensive landscaping. The use of these facilities will be strictly regulated by the By-laws and Rules of Use established by the Homeowner's Association. These swimming pool and recreation areas are not interconnected and the separation by landscaping elements and structures will prevent any significant trans- mission of noise out of a given area. Most of the tennis courts and the tennis clubhouse are grouped together in a central area and the use of these facilities will be controlled by a club manager and tennis professional. The tennis courts are designed to be below adjacent areas with extensive landscape buffering to minimize the transmission of sound and light to these areas. The golf course and clubhouse are remote from the residential areas and will be controlled by a club manager- and golf pro- fessional. The general design of the proposed project anti- cipates a high level of landscaping which is highly effective in diminishing noise. In view of the limited potential for the usual objectional noise sources and the responsibility of the Homeowner's Associa- tion to the residents for orderly administration of the (32) facilities, noise levels on this project will equal or better the standards of the proposed County . Noise Control Ordinance. 3 . Vehicular Movement: The proposed C.C. & R. 's prohibit vehicles other than regular passenger cars and golf carts for member use. All interior roadways will be private. The only thoroughfare not strictly private will be the boundary street known as Monterey Avenue along the western boundary of the project . The site plan recommended for approval by the East Area Planning Council of the County of Riverside as Conditional Use Case No. 1450-E (CUP) shows this public street as a four lane road (major highway) with a center median. Traffic noise connected with this project will generally fall into two categories: 1) that generated on primary traffic paths and 2) that generated on secondary traffic paths. The primary traffic path within this project will be the exten- sion of Clancy Lane East from its Monterey Avenue intersection. This route will have the highest volume of traffic and there- fore will be responsible for the largest source of noise. For this reason, special precautions have been taken to assure that noise levels inconsistent with adjacent functions do not occur. To reduce noise transmission from the road to the residential areas, a continuous, undulated combination of concrete block wall and landscaped buffer along the road easement will be (33 ) provided . This combination of walls and landscaping will absorb and deflect vertically road noise away from the resi- dential areas . The secondary traffic paths within the project will be those roads which are traveled by residents going to and from their home to the primary path. Because of the low volume and re- stricted speed of travel on the secondary paths, it is not expected that noise levels any higher than normal residential streets will exist . Landscaping along the street, entry court walls and accepted acoustical construction standard of the individual living unit will be sufficient to eliminate this source of unacceptable noise levels. 4. Open Space: The only significant potential noise sources in open areas of the desert and channel, other than recreational, would be wildlife such as mockingbirds and coyotes, and climatological such as thunder from electrical storms and winds. These are all considered natural occurances and would therefore have a beneficial effect on the area inasmuch as a desirable feature of residing in the area is the capability of observing such phenomenon. 5 . Construction and Maintenance: Some noise will be generated in the course of construction by the heavy equipment and labor force working on the project . (34) As this project is approximately one mile or more from existing urban developments, temporary construction noise should not be an undue nuisance to the nearby residents. Construction contracts will include reference to the use of Monterey Avenue for heavy equipment, rather than Clancy Lane. A special area that would be a potential noise source is the maintenance shops for the golf course. This facility will be isolated in the golf course area and will be buffered with landscaping. This will effectively "remove" it as a noise source to residences. Service vehicles will be permitted on a controlled basis to lessen noise from this source . The proposed C .C . & R. ts provide for prohibition of any ani- mals, livestock or fowl, with the exception of small pets, in the residential areas, as well as prohibiting motorcycles, dune buggys, etc . D. GEOGRAPHY AND GEOLOGY The project is located on the floor of the valley, a short distance East of an alluvial fan formed by outwash from the mountains through the ravines of Magnesia Canyon. (See Exhibit C) The site elevations range from 2101 at the Northwest corner to elevation 1801 at the Southeast corner, with an average grade of 3 1/2 percent . Palm Desert is located on the same land form and (35) elevation as contrasted with Indio, also on the Coachella Valley floor and 10 miles East, at elevation 11 feet below sea level. The mountain ranges of San Jacinto and Santa Rosa are the source of the materials forming the alluvial fan lying westerly and southerly. The site basically consists of deposits of blowsand and finer particles than that found closer to the mountains. The opinions and knowledge of the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, 45926 Oasis Street, Indio, California are submitted: Effect on Soils and Geology: In review of the general design they commented that no excessive or severe earth excavations were intended, nor any major dis- turbance of the natural soil conditions shown. They, therefore, could see no permanent damage to the Geological Environment as far as grading or construction is concerned. Some of the soils in this area are being utilized for agricultural pasturage. Since the pasture will be converted to golf course use, and the horses moved to corrals and stables on another portion of the site, the use of the area for residential and recreational purposes would in no way be damaging from a geological or agri- cultural standpoint, to the neighborhood or community. When addressing themselves to the question of wind damage and dust potential, the Soil Conservation Service feels that if the standards of the California Air Pollution Control regulations are followed, (36) wind erosion of the soil will not occur during construction periods. The Servicets opinion is that the project will produce a benefit to the neighborhood in that wind and water erosion will be sub- stantially diminished by extensive improvements in paving, plant- ings, buildings, windbreaks, and other ground cover. Therefore the general impact to the local community as a whole will be a positive and beneficial one. With particular interest to geologic faulting, the Soil Conser- vation Service refers to a geologic map prepared by the State of California, Division of Mines and Geology. The map shows that the Coachella Valley is bounded on the North and South by two major fault zones, (1) The San Andreas and (2) The San Jacinto. No faults appear on or near (within 2 miles) the project site, therefore there is no indication of serious implications for the project . Based upon the map data, this area is considered remote from active sheer zones which can be classed as potential earthquake zones. The history of construction in the general area has indicated no serious problems from the standpoint of destructive earthquake activity. Considerable building construction of various types of building and structures have continued throughout the Coachella Valley region. Of the various types of structures, the wood frame, multiple story units as proposed are the most resistant (37) to earthquake shock. All construction will be in compliance with the Uniform Building Code, which standardizes requirements for construction based upon the earthquake zone in which each area is situated. Site grading will be in conformance with the results and recommendations of a soils engineer and County requirements. E. COMMUNITY RESOURCES Data Source: The majority of information in this section was obtained from existing public service data and interviews with the various authorities whose services were subject to impact from the Desert Squire Ranch project . ( See Bibliography in Appendix) . 1. Utilities: Electric - The Southern California Edison District indicated that there will be little or no impact on the general community from the standpoint of electrical service. The only additional services that will be required are some larger conduits. The load in this area will have no deleterious effects on overall capacity since the power company has long range plans for the development of energy supply to this general area. This program for increased capacity, is predicated upon their estimate for the continued growth of the region and will not (38) be affected by this development, since predicted growth factors include the rate of occupancy anticipated by Desert Squire Ranch developers. Because all service, including existing power lines, will be underground , existing and future views will not be impaired . No poles or overhead lines will be required . No atmospheric pollution will be generated in the region by the electrical services to be demanded by this development . No new energy sources are contemplated as a result of this development other than those already anticipated for the long range supply of energy for the general Coachella Valley area served by the Southern California Edison Company. The Company now operates a substation at the Northwest corner of Clancy Lane and Monterey Avenue, at the entrance to the project . A landscaping program is in effect around this site. No significantly high noise levels are anticipated and no significant impact to or from the project will occur. Gas - The Southern California Gas Company indicated that, in general, there would be no environmental impact insofar as natural gas is concerned . They elaborated by indicating that more than adequate capacity exists for this project and that the gas company conducts , their pipeline planning in ten year periods and in advance of (39) construction. They further noted that consumption of natural gas does not contaminate the atmosphere because the gas is 100% consumed with the principle remaining by-products being carbon dioxide and oxygen, both of which are natural products which combine with the normal atmosphere. They advised that the source of fuel for this project is natural gas developed from subterranean supplies of which 75% is imported from out of state and 25% is developed from the Los Angeles basin area. They indicated that the demand resulting from the Desert Squire Ranch subdivision will make no appreciable difference in the source and that they could see no way in which this would have an environmental impact . Full insulation of the houses as proposed will tend to conserve the natural resource by reducing per capita natural gas con- sumption. They also noted that the gas company is sensitive as to the disturbance of any underground archaeological material evidenced during installation of mains and laterals. if they expose such, they immediately notify- the University of California in Riverside. They also feel that the gas company is very sensitive as to the replacement of soils in as near a natural condition as possible. They thoroughly compact backfill where mains and (40) laterals cross streets and driveways in order to prevent any sinking of the sub-base material and therefore any injury to the finished paving material. Communications - All communications facilities within the project will be underground installations with a corresponding beneficial impact to the community. Telephone - This service is available to the area from General Telephone Company of California. Normal growth planning of the Company includes provisions for services to this project . Television - Two local stations affiliated with national networks are received directly on ultra-high frequency (UHF) channels . Los Angeles stations can be received on cable service provided by Coachella Valley Television Company, Palm Desert . All stations provide news reporting as do several regional and local radio stations. Newspapers - Coverage is abundant with several local, regional and national newspapers being readily available. Daily: Local - Desert Sun - Palm Springs Indio Daily News - Indio Palm Desert Daily News - Palm Desert (41) Regional - Press Enterprise - Riverside National - Many are available due to the high demand from the semi-retired and vacationers who hail from through- out the world . These include the Los Angeles Times, Christian Science Monitor, Wall Street Journal, etc. Weekly: Local - Palm Desert Post - Palm Desert Impact upon the newspapers will generally be in the form of more circulation and increased news reporting with additional classified advertising. Water - The availability and potential impact from the project on water supply is discussed in Section II B of this report . Fire Protection - The Riverside County Department of Fire Protection indicated the project will be adequately served by the existing facilities at the Palm Desert Fire Station, and there is no need for a new fire station, site in the Desert Squire Ranch area. Standards and conditions of the Department of Fire Protection for the project are specified (42) by ordinance and included in the conditions of the use (CUP) permit . Additionally, the large lakes within the proposed project and the large volumes of water used to irrigate the golf course would further enhance fire fighting efforts. There appears to be no significant impact relating to fire protection facilities insofar as the project is concerned . Transportation and Roads - A local public transportation system does not exist in the general area at this time. Transportation presently consists of interstate bus, taxis, and private automobiles. Air transportation is available from Palm Springs Municipal Airport . Public roads for the project which are to be operated and maintained with public funds will be limited to the extension of Monterey Avenue from Country Club Drive to Parkview Avenue in Palm Desert . This roadway will be constructed on a co- operative basis between Riverside County and adjoining property owners . The developer will provide landscaping along the project portion of the road to enhance the appearance and reduce the effect of vehicular noise and headlight glare from traffic using this thoroughfare. The balance of the roads will be restricted to private access, within the interior of the project . They will not be available for use by the general public . The roadway system will be serviced by the project homeowners at no expenditure of public (43 ) funds for operation or maintenance. Sewage Disposal - The development of the Desert Squire Ranch project will: develop a substantial increase of human wastes . At the present time, a major sewer trunk line runs through and adjoining the project site. The development is eligible and will connect with this system. The trunk line was designed to accomodate this and other developments in the area. The question of what type of sewage disposal to be used was covered during the preliminary conceptual stages of the pro- ject . Alternates such as the individual septic-effluent type system as well as on-site community treatment facilities were considered . It was concluded that the best method of handling these domestic wastes was by participation within the projected Coachella Valley County Water District 's (CVCWD) comprehensive plan, which set forth ultimate centralized treatment facilities for the Palm Desert area . Discussions were held with CVCWD after which a feasible pro- gram for implementation was developed . An agreement between Desert Squire Ranch and the CVCWD was consummated, allowing the trunk line through this site. Essentially the developer will install the onsite sewage collection system and tie into the existing sewage trunk line from the development to a new Sewage Treatment Plant (STP) at Cook Street, located on the North side of the ldhitewater (44) River Channel . The Cook Street STP location has been approved by the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors of the County of Riverside, by the California State Regional Water Quality Control Board, the State `dater Resources Control Board, and the Environmental Protective Agency of the United States Government . The plant has been approved for a Clean 'dater Grant and the final design plans and specifications for the STP are completed and are under review by the State Water Control Board and the Environ- mental Protective Agency for final approval and advertising for bids . The Cook Street STP will be an activated sludge facility producing secondary treatment . The reclaimed water will be contracted to various recreational facilities for irrigation purposes, as well as for use by COCWD operations such as the Whitewater Storm Channel Dust Control Program. Water will also be placed into recharge basins for return to the under- ground water supply for eventual re-use downstream. The onsite sewage collection system will be extended to the development in incremental phases as required throughout the ten year development program. The installation of the trunk sewer line and the establishment of the Cook Street treatment plant is of major benefit to the community of Palm Desert . Expected long-term benefits (45) of this community system are: reduced costs, more reliable service, higher quality of effluent and more efficient re- charge of the groundwater basin with reclaimed water. Solid Waste Disposal - Another phase of human waste disposal is the collection and disposal of garbage and trash generated from the proposed development . The Palm Desert Disposal Company, Inc . , collects and disposes of solid waste material including all garbage and trash. The company has been meeting the service demands as the area grows and plans to continue to do so in the future. They foresee no difficulty in providing service to Desert Squire Ranch and other similar projects as the community continues to grow. Waste materials collected by the Palm Desert Disposal Service, Inc . , are hauled approximately 12 miles North to the Riverside County Edom Hill Disposal Area near Varner Road . . This facility is a sanitary land fill operated by the Riverside County Road Department . The pro- posed development will make no increase in air pollution as burning of waste material is prohibited . It is expected that the capacity at this facility will provide adequate disposal into the future. The Edom Hill Disposal Area is located in a , remote undeveloped area of steep canyons with similar adjoining parcels available for future expansion. The site is elevated above the valley floor, in a location which does not disturb natural drainage (46) i flows or water channels, thereby precluding potential pollu- tion of groundwaters. 2 . Public Services: Flood Protection - That portion of the project site where build- ing structures will be located is protected from flooding by an existing system of dikes upstream and channels maintained . by the CVCWD and Riverside County Flood Control. Excellent water spreading and infiltration characteristics i prevail on the site and in the area . Construction will not be permitted to substantially block, dam, divert , channelize or concentrate stormwaters . The golf course will be designed to maintain and improve the existing water spreading and in- filtration characteristics of the valley floor. Anticipated beneficial effects of development include increased rate of infiltration and reduction or elimination of erosion. In addition, measures are proposed by the developer to stabi- lize soil erosion along the bank of the 'dhitewater River Channel, such as turfing. The protection afforded by the existing flood control facili- ties upstream and adjoining (Whitewater River Storm Channel) will not be impaired by the proposed development . Golf course irrigation water will be partially consumed by evaporation, but substantial quantities will infiltrate into the soil and thus be returned to the groundwater. (47) Parks - The Coachella Valley Recreation and Park District (CVRPD) indicated that the development, as proposed with substan- tial recreational amenities such as the golf course, riding facilities, arts and crafts center, tennis courts, swimming pools and green areas, will lessen the relative total community requirements for recreation facilities provided by CVRPD. They also noted that the substantial increase in the tax re- venue (approximately $0.10 per $100.00 assessed valuation) to the Park District will make a substantial contribution in Park funds. This would result in a benefit to the community as a whole, without any call .on these funds from the Desert Squire Ranch development . This project will, therefore, create additional revenues without adding proportional require- ments for public facilities, in contrast with a development with lesser or no recreation facilities . They further indicated that because of the organized and planned recreational facilities and the operation by profes- sional supervision this project will result in a better training and higher recreational level than is normally found in the community. Insofar as aspects of the development relating to recreation and parks are concerned, they indicated that a beneficial impact will result on the community from the proposed project . Schools - The Desert Sands Unified School District indicated (48) that the estimated maximum number of students expected as a result of full project development will be approximately 190, and that these students would be predominantly high school age. They further indicated that no new school site would be required as the result of this project . Their superintendant, Dr. Harold Schoenfeld has been quoted as saying, "The trend for most school districts is toward the 'Educational Park Concept ' where all children are bussed from their communities to centers rather than attending local community schools. Bussing is provided free to all students by the Board of Education. " An adaptation of this concept is presently in practice in Palm Desert where children are centralized by grade standing to specific schools. For example, the public school students from Desert Squire Ranch will attend schools in Palm Desert as follows: Grades K/1/2 Washington School on South Portola Grades 3/4/5 Lincoln School on North Portola Grades 6/7/8. Palm Desert Middle School Grades 9/10/11/12 Indio High School The School District feels that the development of Desert Squire Ranch would not cause an adverse strain on the district from excess students . They added that the District could expect a substantial income from tax revenues from the development of (49) Desert Squire Ranch. It has been noted that a large percentage of students who attend the private schools in the Coachella Valley live in the type of development which is proposed. Since a private school (Hawthorne Christian School, K-8) is located within 1/4 mile West of the project, it is reasonable to anticipate some attendance there. Also, a private high school (Montclair Preparatory School) is located in Palm Springs, 10 miles Northwest . Police - The California Highway Patrol has advised that because of the private nature of the development, areas behind guarded gates would not be patrolled regularly for traffic enforcement although those areas would be serviced for traffic injury and accidents needing investigation by the Highway Patrol. Due to the fact that when the extension of Monterey Avenue is accomplished this will be the only public street of significance patrolling for traffic enforcement would be essentially limited to this street . They indicated that the California Highway Patrol has a large and mobile force for assignment and that the development of the Desert Squire Ranch project as presented would have little or no effect upon the services of the Califor- nia Highway Patrol . Primary responsibility for law enforcement functions other than traffic control lies with the Riverside County Sheriff. ( 50) This office does not provide primary patrol services for properties within their jurisdiction, but rather provides response service to requests for service and investigatory services in criminal cases. As a result of the private character of the development with private security service, radar monitoring and guarded entry gates, and the expected age and income level of the residents, the sheriff's office expects a lower level of service to be required by this project than by comparable conventional developments without internal security provisions. The extension of Monterey Avenue will provide adequate access for emergency response to the project , as well as greatly improving access to existing roads by residents neighboring the project . The project is designed to be semi-private in nature to provide protection for the residents and properties within the develop- ment . Access to the project by the general public will be restricted . Privacy will be maintained by walls and screening adjacent to public areas and controlled entrances to the interior of the project . Security within the project will be maintained by entrance gate attendants, radar, closed circuit TV, and internal security patrols . The sheriff's office recommended the following features to be incorporated in the project for the most efficient and effective ( 51) law enforcement and crime prevention: a . All service and security personnel applicants receive comprehensive screening prior to employment . b . Adequate and effective street lights be installed . c . Alarm systems of superior design and installation be installed, with automatic telephone alert lines con- nected to the sheriff's office. Considerations for these recommended features will be incor- porated in the final designs for the project . Mail - Both Rancho Mirage and Palm Desert Postmasters, in discussing the various facets of the project concerning postal service, concluded that there would be no appreciable impact to the community as far as mail service is concerned . This is especially true if the developer is willing to work with the Post Office Department concerning private areas and con- sideration of neighborhood box units for mailboxes . The developer plans to cooperate and work with the Postal Service in incorporating these considerations into the final designs. Health - The Desert Hospital in Palm Springs indicated that generally for every person added to the community, one person day is required of a hospital bed per year. The hospital will have to expand its bed capacity in the immediate future as it is nearing capacity. They advised that the maximum rate of ( 52) of occupancy for a hospital under normal conditions is 80 to 85% and that the Desert Hospital at the present time is running 80% or higher. During the season from October 1971 to April 1972, 206 of the total 213 beds were in use during some periods of time. This 7 bed contingency is judged to be insufficient . It is the opinion of the Desert Hospital that the development of Desert Squire Ranch will have some impact on the Desert Hospital based on the fact that a large percent of the pro- fessional medical practitioners residing in the area from Indian Wells to Palm Springs have offices in Palm Springs. They noted that there were only a small number of Palm Springs professionals who had offices in the Eisenhower Medical Center (located 2 miles North of the project) and a few others who had offices in Palm Desert . They also noted that the majority of the Palm Springs professional people place patients in the Desert Hospital, where it is convenient to their offices . To this extent, the development of the Desert Squire Ranch project may effect the occupancy rate at Desert Hospital. Funding for hospital capacity is provided in two ways: one by donations and the other by the issuance of bonds, which the hospital is authorized to issue without public vote. They noted that in most cases the donations covered all or the largest percentage of the cost . When differences have to be made up by bonds these are amortized from the hospital operat- ing revenues with no direct tax load being placed upon the community. It, therefore, appears that no financial impact ( 53) l on the hospital district or Eisenhower Medical Center will result from this development. Eisenhower Medical Center in Palm Desert presently has 135 beds with an approximate 40 bed occupancy rate. Two additional hospitals are located in Indio. 3 . Economic: Trade - It is expected that any impact on community commercial activities from the proposed project will be beneficial . Construction of the project and subsequent requirements of its residents will result in a substantial inflow of consumer dollars and increased demand for local goods and services. Taxes - An increased tax base will result from implementation of this development . Economic beneficial impact is substantial as shown in Section II H of this report . Property Values - Appreciation of adjacent property values are anticipated as a result of this project . This is further discussed in Section II H of this report . F. HABITAT 1 . Human: Land Use - 8D% of the project is proposed as open space. The major recreational elements include a golf course and club ( 54) facilities, 17 tennis courts and club facilities, lakes (20 acres) , an arts and crafts center, stables, bicycle and walk- ing paths. Residential units are inter-related to recreational elements. Automobile circulation and parking exceeds County minimum standards. The convenience commercial center will primarily service the immediate needs of the Desert Squire Ranch residents . Development Standards - All home owners have the opportunity to partake in all recreational activities if they wish . All homes are oriented to a recreational element: golf, tennis, pools, etc . , and are sited for views and to protect views of other homes. All units will have private outside areas . Almost all the existing 20,000 trees are to remain for wind protection, as well as for aesthetics . The community, which will be fully landscaped, will be maintained by the home owners, assuring highest quality of community beauty . All architecture is of similar style, with similar materials, creating a sense of community identity. Materials are all natural and intrinsic to the desert. Buildings are designed with long overhangs for sun protection. The homes are clustered, creating large open spaces as well as a village look to each cluster of units. In the medium high density garden apart- ment area the following development standards are to be used: 1. 70% of the parking will be underground . ( 55) 2 . Buildings are designed and sited to preserve sight lines from the exterior streets as well as the adja- cent home sites. 3 • No elevation of structure will have over 2 stories of height visible, due to siting taller structures behind shorter structures. A community convenience commercial center will provide essen- tial services for the citizenry, available at walking or golf cart distances . This concept is consistant with the principle that with the path systems of the project, the automobile is not necessary within the community. A 'guest village' area will .accomodate, by .reservation, guests of the home owners in the community. 2 . . Wildlife: Habitats and Migration - Habitats and Mammalian Communities are clearly defined by R. Mark Ryan in "Mammals of Deep Canyon, Colorado Desert, California . " Publication of this book was assisted by Mr. Lloyd P. Tevis, Jr. , a member of the Board of Trustees of the Desert Museum. Mr. Tevis has been previously interviewed for his opinion of the environmental impact of a similar project in the community, as related to wildlife that may be affected by a proposed development of this nature. Habitats within the influence of the project are: "Sand Dunes and Creosote Habitat at approximately 200 feet ( 56) elevation above sea level, and Sand Dunes and Mesquite Habitat consisting of dense mesquite shrubs in the sand dunes mentioned above. ,, Other habitats lying above the impact area of the proposed development are: "Creosote-Palo Verde Habitat, one of the two primary ones situated on the flood plain of Deep Canyon over two-thirds of the flood plain, from about the 900 foot level to the sand dunes; Cholla-Palo Verde Habitat which covers the upper end of the Deep Canyon flood plain, between the Creosote-Palo Verde association and the abruptly rising foothills and spurs of the Santa Rosa Mountains; and Rocky Slopes Habitat, the distinct lowest in elevation on the Santa Rosa Mountain slopes between approximately 400 and 1200 feet elevation. Following we find the Agave- Ocotillo Habitat , between about 1500 and 3500 feet ; Pinyon- Juniper Habitat between 3500 and 4500 feet elevation; Chaparral Habitat between 4500 and 6400 feet ; and Coniferous Forest Habitat from about 6300 feet elevation to the peaks. ,, Life Zones and Vegetation - Life zones refer to elevational belts, each having a particular association of plants and ani- mals peculiar to it . Originally predicated upon climate, primarily temperature, (Merriam, 1892) the life zone concept is often a useful tool to express animal distribution in mountainous western North America . ( 57) The Deep Canyon area includes three classic life zones, which are quite distinct . The ascent is so rapid from sea level on the desert floor to over 8,000 feet on Santa Rosa Peak, that the Lower Sonoran, Upper Sonoran and Transition Life Zones are all represented in a distance of some eight miles. ( See Exhibit L) . The three life zones of the Deep Canyon area closely correspond to the plant communities found in the region (Munz, 1959) • The Lower Sonoran Zone extends from the desert floor to approxi- mately the 3500 foot level on the face of the Santa Rosa Moun- tains. It embraces the several associations of xerophytic plant species of the Creosote Bush Scrub community on the desert floor and lower slopes upward through a narrow ecotone (i .e. , over-lapping on transitional area between distinct plant associations) of mixed yucca, juniper, agave, and cactus . The flood plain and surrounding foothills are included in the Lower Sonoran, as are the rims of Deep Canyon upward just be- yond Black Hill Dos Palmas (Dos Palmos) Spring. The Upper Sonoran corresponds to the Joshua Tree Woodland, Pinyon-Juniper Woodland and Chaparral communities. It extends upward from the 3500 foot level, abruptly ending at the edge of the coniferous forest , about 6,300 to 6, 500 feet elevation. The Transition Zone is the Yellow Pine Forest Plant community rising up to the peaks of the Santa Rosa Mountains at approxi- mately 8,000 feet elevation. ( 58) The project portion of the desert floor area, at present, has little or light use by the general public as it is, in fact, all private land including the Whitewater River Channel of the CVCWD. 'While the CVCWD does not prohibit public use, they do not encourage it, due to the resulting litter of trash and other debris that use by the public occasions . The for- malized and planned use of the area for golf, tennis, and in the case of the channel an equestrian route, would actually provide a much wider base for recreational use without doing any substantial harm to the flora and fauna in the area . Effect of the total impact on the general environment with respect to the area' s flora and fauna has been discussed with the Living Desert Reserve in Palm Desert and Mr. Lloyd Tevis, Research Associate of the Phillip L. Boyd Deep Canyon Desert Research Center, University of California. Mr. Tevis' opinions have been stated in a recent report saying that little or no substantial effects upon the wildlife would be created by a development such as that contemplated. He is quoted as saying that one acre of desert land sustains a certain amount of wildlife and that the removal from the natural condition of the site for the development will create some migration and some loss, of this wildlife. He also noted that the addition of watering and landscaping will increase the food and water supply for birds and insect life and small mammal life will probably also be assisted . ( 59) Species - The Living Desert Reserve in Palm Desert is one of the nearest refuges for wildlife to the site. More vegetation, birds and animals and insects inhabit this general Rancho Mirage-Palm Desert area than most of the alluvial fans in the general cove communities. (See Exhibits M1, Mz and M3) . The effectiveness of the Living Desert Reserve with its proxi- mity to the surrounding undeveloped desert is important to the larger mammals such as coyotes, which tend to require a large area in which to circulate. The open spaces provided in, and adjacent to the golf course areas and, particularly, along the South edge of the project (Whitewater Channel) will provide a continuity of unrestricted open space for such circulation. Circulation in the residential areas of the project will be severely restricted; however, coyotes have been observed in adjacent residential areas. A minor negative effect during construction may be a temporary migration of some animals to the perimeter of the residential area. It is concluded that long term environmental impact on wild- life in the locality caused by this development will not be significant . 3 • Archaeology: The existence of artifacts and other evidence of early man is prevalent through the region; but primarily in the alluvial cove areas . Areas such as "the cove" offered local Indians (6o) suitable sites which provided wind protection and a supply of water and game from the surrounding mountain foothills. The developers recognize that preservation of such historic materials is most important . There are no known archaeological sites on the property, and the impact in this regard is not known. With an awareness of the situation, it is probable that any negative impact will be small. Discovery of a major campsite could have a large positive impact in providing increased archaeological history and help provide a public awareness that will aid in preservation of important archaeo- logical information. Again, due to the location of the project, such a discovery is extremely remote. G. LAND USE 1 . Compatibility: Quality - A project with the quality of this development will force other developers to maintain the high level of planning and amenities provided in order to be competitive. This will cause an upward spiraling effect that will continue to improve and benefit the community in years to come. Sightlines - Based on the assumption that adjacent developments would be buffered by like size and kind, lines of sight from selected perimeter points were projected over the nearest pro- ject structures across the balance of the .project site. From this analysis, it was concluded that not more than 2 stories (61) of any building in the interior of the project would be visible from adjacent properties over the first row of buildings. This point was confirmed in the field by observation of immedia- tely adjacent areas . Community Identity - Because most of the surrounding properties are undeveloped, this project will set the tone of future construction in the area . Probably the most important con- sideration of the impact of this development on the community is the nature of the development itself. A project of this size and scope with the recreational amenities that are to be provided along with the quality of the development can only have a beneficial affect . This beneficial affect will be felt not only as an up grading of the area, but will also seta precedent for future development . The concern for neighbors adjoining the site and the community is evidenced in the plan in several ways to insure that the proposed development has no adverse affect on any existing development . 2 . Residential: Dispersion - In the condominium cluster areas the mnct anon r description would be "low Profile". In these areas have been grouped units of varied size and orientation that are basically one story in height . Variation and roof shapes and materials along with diversity in entry court design and (62) layout, will produce street scenes and elevations that will relieve monotony without sacrificing the integrity of the architectural design. A 'Guest Village? is featured, consisting of 58 units, to pro- vide visitor accomodations for residents of the project . The 'Garden Apartments' ( 540 units) will range from 1 and 2 story buildings to 4 and 5 stories, and are proposed in the last stages of construction. These groups of buildings are isolated from the balance of the project by lakes and fairways, and are designed and oriented so that a pleasant visual effect from all portions of the project is afforded . The development is unified by a 'California Western' motiff using sympathetic materials of natural color and texture, which are harmonious with the desert surroundings. The basic building materials and textures which will make up the archi- tectural palette will include, but not be limited to, clay tile roofs, heavily textured plaster, rough sawn wood siding, rough sawn wood facias, natural colored slumpstone or adobe walls, and dark glass. All colors will be selected for their ability to enhance these materials and blend pleasurably into the total development . Vistas - All condominium units are planned and sited to take the best advantage of view while providing a maximum degree of privacy. All units are provided with covered carports and privacy patios, which will give residents maximum flexibility (63) in controlling their immediate surroundings and life style. The unit plans themselves have been designed to give residents maximum flexibility within the condominium. Large living rooms with high ceilings and expansive glass areas will tend to bring the outside common area into the space, and guarantee a feeling of openness in all units. Similarly all bedrooms and kitchen areas have been designed to take advantage of views and natural light, while providing privacy by the use of court walls . Beautification - The landscaping program which will accompany the development of the condominium units will be closely co- ordinated by the Architect/Planner. Use of indigenous desert plant material will be a key feature. In areas of potential noise source, a heavy landscape buffer will be provided to eliminate the problem. Landscaping and plant material will be used whenever possible to provide shade and sun protection to the units, without impairing the vistas and views . By employing creative landscape techniques with both plant material and paved walks, an exciting environment can be developed for pedestrian circulation within the project . In addition to future landscaping plans, there are 20,000 trees presently growing on the site. Security - For the safety ,and peace of mind of those who will live in this development , there will be an entry gate that will (64) be guarded 24 hours a day. The perimeter of the project will. be fenced and a radar system employed . Closed circuit TV is planned . The interior will be patrolled by a private security force to assure safety and security to the residents of this development . 3 . Recreational: , As part of the total environmental design program, the project will provide a wide range of recreational amenities for the use and enjoyment of the residents of the project . Golf Course and Club Complex - Most prominent of these ameni- ties is the golf course and club complex . This complex will consist of an 18 hole golf course, a large clubhouse and re- creation areas . The clubhouse will be a main recreational structure for the entire development and as such will contain all of the more desirable features usually incorporated into this type of facility. Some areas that will comprise the club facility will be a large dining area capable of handling large parties and balls, a bar, men's and women's locker rooms, card room, and Pro Shop. All golf carts will be stored in a separate building, along with bag storage . The building itself will be of the same character as the rest of the development , combining natural materials and a low profile to achieve an area of elegant . simplicity. The planning concept adopted in the layout of the 18 hole golf (65) course includes substantial lakes stocked with fish. This concept; which will be refined by a recognized golf course architect, will give the course a more natural and challenging aspect, as well as providing fishing at selected areas. Tennis Complex - .Another recreational facility provided in the development will be a tennis complex, consisting of 17 tennis courts and a tennis clubhouse, combined with the golf clubhouse. This facility will be of similar architectural character to the balance of the development . The tennis courts will be depressed approximately 3 feet in order to reduce noise and cut down the amount of fencing that could be visually unacceptable. Arts and Crafts Center - This center will provide the third recreational aspect of the project . It will include a wood- shop, ceramics area, lapidary, and other similar crafts which a survey of the homeowners might show desirable. Equestrian Center - This center will have an ultimate capacity of 40 stables, including an arena and accessory tack rooms . A comprehensive dust, fly and odor control program is planned . 4. Commercial: The project is intended to accomodate 1OZ1 households . In order to provide the optimum in convenience consistent with reasonable planning standards a 2 acre 'Ranch Trading Postt becomes desirable and necessary. It includes convenience shops, management offices, beauty and barber shops, laundry, (66) a coffee shop, and a 30 room lodge. The scope and size will be further regulated by County ordinances particularly designed for this type of accessory. H . ECONOMIC In making an environmental impact study of the effects from a large development on a community, economic impact should be care- fully considered along with other aspects. Health, safety, wel- fare and the right of enjoyment are dependent to some degree upon material resources, production, consumption and distribution of goods and services. The life-style of every individual is largely dependent upon personal economic resources and the economic resources of the community in which he resides. The general type, nature and style of a new development must reflect the economic demand in the community for such a development . To measure the economic impact on the community of the proposed development, the following five elements have been considered: 1) the price range for dwellings in the proposed project ; 2) in- comes of the owners and occupants of this project; 3) how the community economy will be affected; 4) the effects this project will have upon the community tax structure; 5) the scale proposed for the development and special impact on the community resulting from scale. 1. Selling Price: The developers of the Desert Squire Ranch propose to construct (67) dwellings with a variety of styles in a purchase price range of from $45,000 to $90,000 for the planned unit sections of the project . For that portion of the project planned to be developed as a 'Guest Village' a price range of $30,000 to $45,000 per unit is anticipated . The 'Garden Apartment ' unit range is proposed at $35,000 to $60,000. These projected sales prices generally exceed the average values placed on existing residences in the community. 2. Income of Purchasers: To qualify for the purchase of the residences to be offered by the developer, the following minimum requirements for financing must be met:* For the minimum price units at $30 000 Down payment (minimum) $31000.00 Closing cost 500.00 Total cash requirements $3, 500.00 PAYMENTS PER MONTH Mortgage loan balance $27,000 Principal payments 30 yr. term @ 7 1/2% interest $ 189.00 Estimated taxes - $30,000/25% @ $10 62 .00 Fire and hazard insurance 10.00 Homeowner's Assoc . assessment 45.00 Total monthly payment $ 306.00 Mortgagee 's ratio: 4 1/2 x monthly debt service $1077.00 `( Local conventional financing may exceed minimums quoted . ) (68) Annual Net Effective Income Required For Qualification of Buyer Mortgagee deducts from buyer applicant 's gross income any financial obligation longer than 90 days and considers the remaining income as 'buyer's net effective' income. This ?net effective income' must equal as a minimum $16, 500 per annum. For the $50,000 units Down payment (minimum) $5,000.00 Closing cost 800.00 Total cash requirements $5, $00.00 PAYMENTS PER MONTH Mortgage loan balance $45,000 Principal payments 30 yr. term 7 1/2% interest $ 315 .00 Estimated taxes - $50,000/25% @ $10 104.00 Fire and hazard insurance 14.00 Homeownerts Assoc . assessment 60.00 Total monthly payment $ 493 .00 Mortgagee's ratio: 4 1/2 x monthly debt service $2, 216.00 Net Effective Income $26,600.00 For the $90,000 units Down payment (minimum) $91000.00 Closing cost 1, 500.00 Total cash requirements $10, 500.00 (69) PAYMENTS PER MONTH Mortgage loan balance $81,000 Principal payments 30 yr. term 7 1/2% interest $ 566.00 Estimated taxes - $90,000/25% @ $10 225.00 Fire and hazard insurance 22.00 Homeowner's Assoc . assessment 75 .00 Total monthly payment $ 888.00 Mortgageets Ratio - 4 1/2 x monthly debt service $ 49106.00 Net Effective Income $49, 300.00 Minimum gross annual incomes for buyers requiring financing will range, therefore, from $16, 500 per year to $49,000 per year for the planned residential dwellings and units within the project . The foregoing data was supplied by the developer and was reviewed by several banks, including Security First National Bank, to confirm that conformance to the general practice of the area is adhered to and to confirm that the rates of princi- pal and interest payment, as well as estimated taxes and insurance, were .in line and consistent with escrows passing through the local banks in these price ranges. The minimum income of prospective purchasers described above is based upon requirements for conventional financing. A significant number of cash sales are anticipated by the developer, in which case purchasers with considerably smaller (70) annual incomes such as retired persons may afford the annual costs of ownership and maintenance exclusive of debt retire- ment . 3 . Influence on the Economy: Effect of the Proposed Development Upon Surrounding Property Values - The nearest adjacent dwellings to the Desert Squire Ranch project are the residences of a tract on the South side of Clancy Lane, approximately 1/2 mile West of the project . None abut or adjoin the proposed development . The average price of the nearest homes is approximately $40,000. The average value of homes within the Rancho Mirage and Palm Desert communities is substantially below the values proposed for the project . In Riverside .County the Assessor uses fair market value to determine how real property shall be assessed . The procedure of the assessor for determining fair market value is as follows: Upon recordation of any real property conveyances, the asses- sor's office mails data-inquiry sheets to both buyer and seller of real properties, requesting selling prices of the property. This data, plus spot-checking by the County ap- praisers, develops substantially accurate market data for the determination of real property value. Fair market value is then reduced to 25% to determine "assessed" value. Although not always completely current, and therefore only approximately (71) accurate, the fair market values taken from the assessor's office were used to establish existing values in the area in order to make a comparative determination of the value of the existing dwellings versus the value of the proposed project dwellings . As the proposed development will have a substantially higher level of street and utility improvements than the existing community, and as the beginning value will be higher than the existing community, it would seem reasonable that the values in the area will be appreciated by the proximity of the pro- posed development . When the factors of overall community planning, maintenance of the entire area by the Homeowner's Association, and the high level of recreational facilities in the proposed development are considered, it is also reason- able to assume that property values in the proposed development are likely to appreciate faster, and the general level of maintenance to be superior to that of the surrounding community. This factor will tend to create appreciation of the existing lands adjoining Desert Squire Ranch. The Effect of the Proposed Development Upon the Business Elements of the Community - The proposed project has no zoning for, nor any future plans to construct, general or heavy commercial facilities. A very small convenience center is proposed . The services available there, however, are of little consequence. The economic requirements of this residential (72) development will substantially affect the dollar volume spent in the community and thereby stimulate the range of goods and services now available to the community. The 111972 Commercial Atlas and Marketing Guide", page 68, "Sales Data for Counties", published by Rand McNally, shows the following per capita statistics for dollars spent per annum in River- side County: Retail and Shopping Goods Sales $1,931 .00 Food Store Sales 423 .00 Drug Store Sales 71 .00 Hotel and Lodging 22.00 Personal Services 3$.00 Automobile Maintenance and Repair 18.00 Miscellaneous Repair Services 11 .00 Total Per Capita Per Annum $2, 514.00 (Note: The dollars above are rounded to the nearest dollar. ) Based upon a 10 year development program, the proposed project anticipates an average sales rate of 110 dwelling units per annum. The market data for this type development indicates an average family formation of 2 .1 people per family. Based upon this forecast and on the preceding per capita figures, $5,279 .00 will be spent in the community each year per family provided residents occupy dwellings the year round . However, as the proposed development is designed for a mixed market of semi-retired, retired, recreational and second-home owners it (73) is assumed for the purpose of this study that, on an average, occupancy of these dwellings will be for only six months of the year. (Note: This assumption is considered to be conservative, as the "season" in the cove communities generally extends from October to May for seasonal second-home owners . It is estimated that approximately 50% of the purchasers of dwellings in the proposed project may be retired persons spending all or nearly all of the year residing in this com- munity. ) Based upon the foregoing statistics and attendant assumptions, an additional $290, 350 .00 will be spent per annum in the community for goods, food and services by new residents of the project . This dollar volume will increase by approximately this amount each year, culminating in an approximate annual expenditure of $2,903, 500.00 in 1983 by project residents. These figures are based upon 1971 dollars and no adjustments have been made for inflationary factors. Total taxable retail sales for Palm Desert in 1970 were $10, 1$0,000.00. (County of Riverside Department of Develop- ment Bulletin, Retail Sales Coachella Valley) . Employment created by the proposed development will be a substantial stimulus to the general economy of the community. Expenditures, during the construction stages, according to the estimates of the developer, will run approximately $4,000,000.00 per annum exclusive of the cost of the real property, based on an absorption rate of 110 dwellings per (74) year. Although substantial portions of these construction expenditures will be channeled to material suppliers outside of the community, the largest portion of the construction cost will be spent in Riverside County. Direct labor costs for light-frame construction of this type as planned for this development, are approximately 10% of the total cost, accord- ing to figures of the National Association of Home Builders, and indirect labor costs for sub-contractors to install onsite materials and equipment are a minimum of twenty percent (200) of total cost . These are the wages usually paid to local labor forces. Based upon the annual estimate of cost by the developer, approximately $1,200,000.00 per year will be paid to the local labor forces during the ten year construction period . During the first year of development of the proposed project , a permanent management, operating and maintenance labor force will be required . Personnel will be employed initially for the operation of the golf course, the golf-tennis clubhouse, and the tennis courts. Each year thereafter, additional administrative, clerical and labor forces will be added to the permanent payroll. According to figures developed by the National Golf Foundation, golf course labor and supplies for Southern California courses average from $6, 500 to $7,000 per hole, or an average of ( 75) $6, 750 per hole. Approximately $121, 500.00 will therefore be spent locally for the maintenance of the golf course. Administration and maintenance personnel for the golf club- house operation will require a payroll of between $85,000 and $100,000 per annum for the size of facility planned for the proposed development, according to the estimates of the developer. To operate and maintain the tennis courts and tennis clubhouse portion will involve a payroll for management and maintenance of from $45, 000 to $65,000 for the type and size operation planned for this development, according to the estimates of the developer. Homeowners Preliminary Maintenance Assessments have been estimated by the developer at a minimum of $45 per month per dwelling unit . Approximately 30% of this expense is for supplies and utilities and the remainder is represented by wages, all of which will be spent at a local level. Upon completion of the project and cessation of construction payrolls a permanent operation, management and maintenance budget will be required as follows: Golf course, including clubhouse portion. . . . . $ 220,000.00 Tennis courts, including tennis clubhouse portion 45,000.00 Equestrian and Arts and Crafts centers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41,000.00 (76) Residential maintenance, 1100 units @ $45 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 594,000.00 Annual payroll and supply expenditure. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 900,000.00 During the construction and sales period of the proposed development, sales commissions paid to, onsite sales personnel and to local realtors is estimated by the developer at approxi- mately three percent (3%) of the gross sales volume per year. At an estimated annual sales volume of $5,060,000, the sum of $150,000 will be paid each year, based upon the ten year absorption rate, to local real estate sales people., Prior to full completion of the project a turnover in residen- tial ownership will occur. This normal turnover is occasioned by changes in employment, death, reasons of health, change of family status and other demographic factors. According to current figures of the National Mortgage Bankers Association, the average life of a mortgage in the United States is slightly less than 10 years . If the national average is applied to this proposed project, upon completion of the project, approxi- mately 107 of the total 1071 dwelling units will change owner- ship each year. At the standard sales commission current in the area of 6%, and allowing for no appreciation of value, $300,000 .00 will be earned per year by local realtors as resale commissions . Subject to the final completion of the project, and without any adjustment for inflationary factors, a total annual dollar (77) income impact upon the community is estimated as follows: 'cages, salaries and supplies for management operation and maintenance of the recreational facilities . . . . . . $ 900,000.00 Expenditure .for foodstuffs, goods and services. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,903 , 500.00 Real estate commissions . . . . . . . . . . . . . 300,000.00 Annual gross expended in the local market . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$4, 103, 500.00 4 . Development Effect on Community Taxes: The public cost-revenue analysis technique. is used in this study for estimating the economic impact of the ten year growth of this planned unit development on county budgets, school budgets, and county taxes. For this purpose the public expenditure - revenue approach is a form of cost benefit analysis limited to the estimation of the proposed Desert Squire Ranch development on the county budget and the school district budgets. This analysis considers only current public expenditures and does not include capital expenditures by the county or by the school district . All roads and utilities in the proposed development will be installed by the developer at his expense. The cost and revenue figures herein are all based on 1971 data . In certain cases, where 1971 figures are not available, earlier figures have been adjusted to the 1971 base. Initial occupancy of the project will occur in 1973, and no attempt (78) has been made to progressively adjust 1971 's statistics to succeeding years through 1983 when the project is expected to be complete. Public costs and revenue may vary in succeed- years, however, there is little basis for assuming that the ratio between public cost and revenues will .vary substantially. This study has relied upon the annual reports of the County of Riverside, the Desert Sands Unified School District, and the Coachella Valley Community College District, the statis- tical research and consulting division of the State Board of Equalization and the "1972 Commercial Atlas and Marketing Guide" published by Rand McNally. The approach taken will develop a reasonable estimate of the degree of economic impact . County Expenditures - County expenditures have been taken on a per capita basis for the county as a whole and the expected per capita cost for the various elements of public expense in the proposed development, constrasted with normal county expenditures. Certain areas of county wide public costs have been assumed to be the same for the proposed development as for the county as a whole and therefore have been ignored . Typical of these items is the operation of the Board of Supervisors, the Assessor, the Tax Collector and like overall functions of administrative and county-wide costs. The following itemized public costs are specific areas where the proposed development by its nature, type, design and economic range of residents (79) will vary from the county-wide costs: ANNUAL EXPENDITURES PUBLIC PROTECTION - SAFETY Sheriff $ 5,074,986.00 Desert Marshall 156,339 .00 Total $ 5,231,325 .00 DENTENTION AND CORRECTION Industrial Road Camp $ 5923150.00 Jail 1 ,340, 211 .00 Community Day Program 130,476.00 Girl's Treatment Facility 39,635 .00 Juvenile Hall 13040,937.00 Probation Department 2,218,361 .00 Special Probation Service 698,069 .00 Twin Pines Ranch 389,466 .00 Total $ 6,449,305 .00 ROAD CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE $ 8, 168,694.00 PUBLIC ASSISTANCE Welfare .Administration 9, 873 , 894.00 Welfare Catagorical .Aid 51, 134,301 .00 Other Welfare .Aid 334,350.00 Total $61,342, 545 .00 PARKS $ 689,352 .00 ( 80) For items of public expense that vary in the proposed develop- ment from the county averages as enumerated on the preceding page, the following data is applicable: Public Protection - All of the residences in the proposed development will be maintained in enclosed areas with ingress controlled by 24-hour manned guard gates . A portion of the Homeowner's Association services will be the provision of private security patrols within the non-public areas . General public agency patrolling of private areas will .not be required , and Marshall, Sheriff and Highway Patrol personnel will. only serve these areas under specific notification or emergency call . For the purpose of this study, Sheriff and Marshall public expense based upon the private areas and the private services is estimated at 250 of the normal per capita county expense . Detention and Correction - According to the statistics developed by this study from examination of the records of the county, the school districts and an interview with the Desert Sands Unified School District 's Superintendent, it was determined that 11 .33% of the residents in the proposed development will be 21 years of age and under, compared with a county wide average of 41%. The largest percent of theft, burglary and misdemeanors are committed by persons 21 and under. The proposed development will have approximately one fourth the number of persons 21 ( $1) and under of the county average. The Sheriff's Office states that the enclosed private areas with security patrols will tend to reduce the incidence of theft and burglary. Because of the relatively small number of juveniles, and the economic level of the families, public detention and correction costs are estimated at 250 of the county average. Road and Maintenance Expenditures - The total road system of the proposed development consists of private streets, privately maintained . However, for comparative purposes this report considers Clancy Lane as a secondary access with the major access from Monterey .Avenue as a boundary road which serves this development, therefore, the public streets are considered to be 14% of the total streets for the project . Public cost to maintain the project road system, including access routes, will be approximately 140 of the average county per capita cost for this purpose. Public Assistance - Welfare, in the form of aid to families with dependent children, needy, aged, and totally disabled are the major costs to the public under this budget item. Income of families residing in the proposed development will range from $17,000 to $50,000 and up per annum. This income group is seldom eligible for welfare and usually pays its own medical and hospital costs. Ten percent (10%) of the average county per capita cost for this public assistance is estimated to be the maximum demand from this development . ( B2) Parks - The proposed project will have numerous large open landscaped areas with swimming pools and other recreational , facilities distributed throughout the development . A large amount of acreage will be devoted to the lakes and golf course, seventeen tennis courts, equestrian area, and the arts and crafts center. Due to the extensive recreational facilities of the project , it is estimated that residents of this development will require public park facilities on a basis of ten percent (100) of the average for .the balance of the community. Average County Per Capita Costs versus the Proposed Develop- ment Per Capita Cost for public cost items is enumerated below: Public Cost County Proposed Items Wide Development Public Protection $ 10.94 $ 2.73 Detention & Correction 13 .49 3 .37 Road Construction and Maintenance 17.09 2.39 Public Assistance 128.33 12 . 84 Parks 1.44 _ .15 Total Per Capita $171 .29 $21.48 These per capita figures are based on a 1971 County population of 478,000 per Rand McNally. Note: The figures used in this study are not represented ( 83 ) as exact . Because of the difficulty in securing statistics for special sub-sections of the County, it is necessary to make some adjustment and interpolation of available data. The primary intent of the use of the figures quoted herein is to reach representative estimates showing relationships and ratios . For example, from the sources of data available the proposed development will have about one fourth the persons 21 years of age and under of the county average. Dollar figures are used in the same manner, as an approximate indicator of the relative demand for public services in the proposed development versus the county average demand for like public services. Thus relationships or ratios are sufficiently comprehensive to indicate the magnitude of economic impact of this development upon the community. Based upon a total project population of 21250 people, the per capita benefit to the county, being the difference between the average cost of the public services and the cost required by this project, would be $149.81 per annum per capita. This would develop a savings in public costs to the County of Riverside of approximately $33, 700.00 per annum in the first year of development . These savings will ascend by a similar amount each year of the ten (10) year project development period, culminating in annual savings of approximately $337, 000.00 by 1983 . ( 84) The proposed development will have upon completion the following approximate total property value for tax purposes: Ranch Trading Post $ $00, 000.00 Arts & Crafts Center 200,000.00 11071 Residential Units $50,000.00 average 53 , 550,000.00 Golf Course Land - 100 Acres 0 $ 1, 500.00/acre 150;000.00 Lakes & Golf Course - 18 Holes $40,000.00/hole 750)000.00 Golf & Tennis Clubhouse 750,000.00 17 Tennis Courts 1 $ 8,000.00 each 136,000.00 Equestrian Center 75.000.00 Real Property and Improvement Value Total $56,411,000.00 This value at an estimated combined tax rate for 1971 of $10.00 per hundred dollars of assessed value, will yield an approximate total property tax revenue of $1,410,300.00 per annum. Impact of the Proposed Development Upon School District Taxes: The Financial Comparison Report, Office of the Riverside County Superintendent of Schools, 1971-72, indicates a cost per pupil for elementary and high schools of $855.78 per year. The tax rate for the Desert Sands Unified School District 1971-72 is $4.917 per $100 of assessed valuation. ( 85) The Coachella Valley Community College District cost per student per annum is $1,110.26 for 1971-72, and the district tax rate is $.671. "Riverside County Population Projections, 1970-199011 shows that 41 percent of the Riverside County population is 21 years of age and under. This report shows only the County popula- tion for 1970, with the next successive population figures projected to 1975 • The Rand McNally figures of 478,000 for the year 1971 have been used herein. The County report lists population by age brackets for cities in the County of more than ten thousand population. Some of the smaller cities similar in size and community life style to the Palm Desert-Rancho Mirage pattern make more realistic comparisons than would the averages for the entire County or entire school districts. It is noted that cities such as Banning, Corona, Indio, Norco, Rubidoux and the City of Riverside run very close to the County average for persons 21 years of age and under. Hemet shows only 16% of the popu- lation 21 years of age and under, and Palm Springs 24%. Statistics from the Desert Sands Unified School District reveal that anticipated school attendance from the proposed develop- ment when fully constructed and occupied would be as follows: High school students 120 Middle school students 30 Elementary school students 40 (86) Total for elementary and high school - 190 students. This school loading represents 8.45% of the total projected development population. The Hemet average population of college age (30) was applied to the proposed development without any adjustment and the assumption was made that all persons between 18 years of age and 21 years of age would be attending local college. These statistics and assumptions develop an anticipated college attendance of 34 students from the project . Thus the total school loading from the proposed . project is approximately 11.450 of the total development population. On a county-wide comparison, the differential between the school-age residents of the proposed development and the county average is 11.45% versus 410. A comparison of the Desert Sands estimate of student age population and the Hemet rate of student age population applied to the project population is as follows: Age Range Desert Sands Hemet Under 18 190 296 18 - 21 34 34 Total 224 330 On the basis of this comparison the proposed development will have 106 less high school and elementary students than a development of the same scale in Hemet . Thus the cost for ( 87) project students may be approximately $90,700.00 per annum less than a similar development in the lowest school loading area in the County, and may be as much as five times this amount less than the County average. The Desert Sands Unified School District has stated: "It is not our intention to purchase school sites or to request that . the developer hold area available for school sites. ' Due to the low student age population of this development, capital expenditures for land, buildings and equipment are not in- cluded in the above analysis and will not be required by this project . Thus bond issues to provide additional capital funds for students generated by this project will not be required from the community. Other Taxes - The County of Riverside does not impose a personal property tax (other than for business) . The impact of the proposed development on such tax revenues as the County 's refunded portion of the State Board of Equalization. taxes, and the County sales tax would be the additional tax base increase for these taxes. 5 . The Economy of Scale: Large scale developments by their very size will create a num- ber of community benefits which are made possible by creation of a broad economic base. (88) Relatively small developments cannot economically construct and operate championship golf courses. The proposed project will develop a 6900 yard golf course. With an economic base of 1071 dwellings over which the capital costs may be spread and with 2250 individuals to use and therefore financially support the golf course, they become economically viable. This same circumstance applies to the tennis complex of 17 courts and a tennis clubhouse, the arts and crafts center, and the equestrian center. Only economics of scale make this possible. The economics of large scale projects permits the developers to allocate sums for land use studies, engineering and archi- tecture to plan an entire cohesive, well-integrated and inter- related development . The economic impact of the proposed development is beneficial to the community as a whole. Property values in the general vicinity will not suffer any devaluation and will experience substantial appreciation. The business elements of the community will receive the benefit of an ascending infusion of dollar volume for goods and services. The tax base will be substantially broadened and at the same time will require a lower than normal cost for public services. The advantageous tax situation will have particular benefit to the public school revenues. The large scale of the planned project with the high amenities level will tend to create a superior environment . ( 89) III . ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT A . STATEMENT The Desert Squire Ranch project is a well-conceived, substantial development that will create long-range impact upon the local, regional, and jurisdictional areas. 6Vhile the scope of impacts are varied, it is concluded that the overall long-range effects are beneficial. On the short-term period, there are some adverse effects. Most however, are minor and center around the temporary nuisances and inconveniences that accompany new construction. Only due to the large scope of this project, has it been possible to fully assess the depth of these impacts . By drawing upon the knowledge of authorities, consultants and other experts, a develop- ment program has been created which will minimize the short term impacts while providing long-term beneficial effects on the region. (90) B. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT PLAN The initial preparation of an overall comprehensive development plan for a large project establishes a positive line of di- rection. Concurrence and acceptance by the regulatory agencies assures a commitment to a long-range program for ultimate, specific land use. Knowledge that such an approved plan exists allows all parties that might be affected to evaluate their interests .in specific elements of individual future planning. These vary from the individual resident who might prefer a specific type of neighborhood to the controlling agencies and large utility companies in determining major expenditures of capital for financing. In such a way, the rights of all parties are protected against a deviation from the plan. I (91) C . CONFORMANCE WITH EXISTING PLANS As set forth in the conceptual development plan, the project meets the anticipated character of development and projected rates of growth contemplated by various plans of the agencies, utility districts and school authorities, including the goals established in the Riverside County 'Cove Communities Study, a Preliminary General Plan' . The developers and consultants are committed to follow the expertise of the authorities' established guidelines and projections . Using these concepts they have produced a plan which would appear acceptable to the Regulatory Agencies and the owner while maintaining financial feasibility with environmental responsibility. Approval by the regulatory agency and the acceptance of this project by the many authorities involved will attest to the beneficial impact to the public . (92) D . IMPACT AREA PHASES 1. Initial: Neighborhood. - The visual appearance of the site will change as raw ground is converted to urban living. Vege- tation will he removed and the topography altered as grading of the site progresses. Increased heavy vehicular traffic will result primarily on Monterey .Avenue, and to some extent on Clancy Lane, as materials are transferred to the site. Workman transpor- tation will also increase traffic, as will increased "sightseeing" of construction activities by area local residents . As a result of construction activities, noise, vibration, and dust can result . Local wildlife will be displaced from their natural habi- tat . Relocation into surrounding areas can be expected to occur. Local and Regional - As a result of increased construction activities, cash monies will flow into the economy as labor personnel establish living quarters and utilize local services. Sale of construction materials, fuel, regulatory permits and inspection fees, and increased de- mand for labor will have a decided impact on the economy (93 ) of Palm Desert, Rancho Mirage, and the Coachella Valley in general. 2 . Intermediate: Neighborhood - The elements set forth as tInitialt impact will continue throughout the ten year development program. The scope of the impact will remain fairly constant, since the development schedule predicts a level growth rate. This phase is to be one of continual transition from new construc- tion to a finished improved living area . As new residents become settled and vegetation is established, the area will mature and heal and additional "service and operational" jobs will be created . Local and Regional - During this period, local impact will begin to increase as a result of additional people entering the area. The number of constructional personnel should re- main approximately the same. When the living units are con- structed and sold, new residents will enter the area, resulting in additional cash flow for goods and services. Additional demand for long-range service and maintenance jobs will increase. Extension of utility lines will create increased construction activities, resulting in noise, vibration, dust . This nuisance and inconvenience will be primarily restricted to the immediate (94) construction areas. 3 . Long Range: Neighborhood - The long range neighborhood impact is the creation of a well-conceived, quality development having pri- vate multi-living facilities . The development, as programmed , is compatible with the existing neighborhood conditions and the long range planning of the governing authorities and agencies . Local - The local Palm Desert and Rancho Mirage communities will be impacted by increased population and their require- ments, including a higher demand for goods and services, labor, and an increase in traffic flow. The demands upon municipal services, use of parks, schools, etc . , will increase, but at a disproportionately lesser rate than the increased tax revenues which support these facilities. Regional - This project will have a permanent overall effect on the region by requiring more goods and services, as well as the multiple services required by modern society, including the demand for fuel, home furnishings, clothing, food, electric energy, natural gas, water supply, solid refuse collection and sanitary sewage disposal . Tax bases will be increased, while expenditure for tax supported services will not require a proportionate increase due to the type of private recreational development orientated to serve older persons of a retired, (95) semi-retired status and second home residents. E. - REGULATIONS FOR IIZIACT REDUCTION 1. Construction. Phase Control: Noise - Equipment and construction will be limited to daytime working hours . Mufflers will be required on all equipment . Certain additional restrictions may be necessary as the pro- ject progresses and new residents occupy the area. The pro- posed guidelines of the Riverside County noise control regu- lations will be followed . Vehicular Movement - Heavy vehicles, workmen and service transportation will be routed to the site from Monterey Avenue to avoid aggravation and inconvenience to the neighboring residences along the alternate route . (Clancy Lane) Dust - The guidelines of the Riverside County Dust Control Ordinance will be adhered to. Grading operation will include wetting of soils and curtailment of operation during excessive weather conditions as set forth in the proposed ordinance. Surface Runoff - The site grading program will provide control of salient waters in such a manner as to control erosion of soil materials during rainy periods . Ultimate control will include suitable relief waterways to the natural outlet of the 11hitewater River Storm Channel for ground water recharge through spreading. (96) Sanitation - Controlled sanitary disposal facilities will. be provided during construction to meet all standards for pro- tection of public health, as required by the State Health Department rules and regulations. Safety - State regulations regarding all safety standards will apply . archaeological - Commitment for preservation of discovery of any evidence of early man in the form of artifacts, etc . , shall halt all construction activities in the area and the University of California will be contacted immediately. . Visual - Construction will be phased . The primary area is located to lessen the view of activities from the local residences. Subsequent phasing will allow separation of construction areas . Unsightly conditions along the exterior borders shall be restored as quickly as possible to lessen visual impact of new construction. 'di ldlife - Construction will commence at a centralized area and expand outward, thus allowing animals to leave the activity center gradually. If prime nesting areas are observed , the local wildlife authorities will be contacted . Services - Advance notice will be given the supplier of fuels, energy, man power, living requirements and other goods in order to create a more even impact on the demand for their products . (97) 2 . Long Range Control: Advance Planning - Provide advance notice 'to suppliers of goods and services. This includes major services such as energy, communications, transportation, water supply, sewage disposal, solid refuse collection, construction materials, as well as the labor and trade unions, the Palm Desert and Rancho Mirage Chambers of Commerce and other industry within the scope and needs of this project . Recreation Facilities - Will be provided, operated and main- tained exclusive of any expense to the community or public. Utilities - Construction of facilities far in advance of the needs or demand of the project users. Timing - The project is phased to provide a longer more steady economic impact on the area. (98) I y. F . ADVERSE REACTION TO THE PROJECT 1 . Direct Objections: Two local citizens have voiced objections to this project . Their objection seems to be because of the possible increase of traffic on Clancy Lane, due to the project. 2. General Concern: Some objections to projects of this type center around concern of the general increased demand for services required by a growing population. These include added police protection, utilities, schools, road improvements, parking, commercial areas, etc . , as well as an increase in air pollution potential. Another area of concern rests with design characteristic of a development . These include such things as population densi- ties, architectural style, building colors, height of structures, orientation, screening, landscaping, and other items related to individual personal taste. Certain others object outright to any new development . They publicly announce a strong fear of pollution, decrease in property values, increased traffic, loss of open space, etc. They purport that as existing citizens, new development vio- lates their rights, while in reality they are "early settlers" in a long-range development program. They fail to acknowledge the fact that a regional growth plan has been established to assure orderly, compatible development of a variety of land uses in the community. (99) G. PROBABLE LONG RANGE BENEFICIAL IMPACT The project firmly establishes the ultimate land use within the scope of the County Preliminary General Plan and future projections of other authorities . It meets a firm market demand for high quality living units in a world renowned , sun-orientated recreation community. It utilizes the Planned Residential Development Concept (PRD) for full use of the land while maintaining maximum open space and recreational amenities . It stops wasteage of high quality open lands from urban sprawl that often results from conventional residential subdivisions . Clustering allows maximum retention of desirable features, lower costs for utilities. It creates positive ultimate land use, through improvements . Permanent open use is established in such a way as to enhance, retain, and increase water spreading for replenishment of the ground water reservoir, stabilize the highly erosive sand and wind in the area, retain portions of native desert in the wash, retain and establish wildlife habitats and provide for an open migration route for mammals and reptiles of the desert to move freely in the area and adjacent open spaces . It reduces the potential density approximately 60 percent below the present density allowed by the existing zoning. (100) It creates, builds, and promotes a major county highway between Country Club Drive and Parkview Avenue to serve the local traffic . It creates and builds an extensive sanitary sewer collection system, through an area which has previously rejected a sanitary system; thereby making it possible for some adjacent properties to connect to a sewer line with minimal expense. It provides the public with a substantially higher income from the large increase in taxes, since under the PRD "concept the ownership of the roads, parks, recreational facilities and patrol security is provided exclusive of public services. Public outlay for the new residents is substantially less than for citizens of conventional developments . Additional long range benefits are received by the public school system due to the nature of the development being directed to the part-time, elderly or semi-retired citizen, with a very low per- centage of children of school age. This results in a substantial income to the school district at a very small expense. A PRD of this scope provides the owners with a self-contained living unit resulting in low use of the individual automobile. Hence, lower traffic flow than usual creates a more healthy citizen as a result of added exercise through walking. It provides continuity of growth as predicted by the General Plan on which the various utility districts base expansion financing. (10i) This includes major projects such as the Colorado River Water diversion, long range energy transmission, interstate transporta- tion planning, communications, utility districts, sewer and water, as well as private purveyors of goods and services . Ad- herence to a firm plan of growth has immeasurable long-range effects, in contrast to random, uncoordinated "helter-skelter" developments which allow no possibility to accurately forecast grolAth petterns . It adds to the conversion of a recreational community from a fluctuating seasonal labor demand to a more stabilized employment area by creating a year-round facility requiring full labor services for operations and maintenance . It promotes expansion of private businesses in providing both capital goods such as home furnishings, landscaping, autos, etc . , as well as maintenance services such as food, entertainment , and general commodities. ( 102) H . ALTERNATIVES 1 . Development Concept: Several alternate lines of action were available to the owner. The merits of each were considered in the preparation of the Conceptual Development Plan. Retain the property as undeveloped ground for resale or develop- ment at later date. Retain property requesting a rezone for lower use and request a tax reduction accordingly. Develop land by conventional methods perpetuating general urban sprawl by piece-meal subdivisions. Sell portions of the large tract to minor developers for individaul, disassociated projects . Discontinue payment of taxes, eventually leading to forfeiture of title to the County. Develop property under existing zoning into approximately 2150 living units vs . present PRD plan of 1071 living units . (See Exhibit N) 2 . Utilities and Services: General Services - Services such as electrical power, natural gas, communications, fire protection, transportation, solid ( 103) waste disposal, postal service, medical service, and taxes are fairly well fixed and offer no alternative . Water - Both domestic and irrigation water could be developed and operated privately. Due to the high-quality water faci- lities provided by CVC,TD and the high maintenance and operation costs of private systems, this alternative was termed undesirable, unless final costs prove otherwise . Sewage - Sewage disposal could be handled by individual septic- effluent type disposal systems, especially if the project developed as separated conventional subdivisions. A local private sewage treatment plant could be installed on- site as an alternative . Treated effluent could be utilized as a supplement to the irrigation needs of the planned golf courses. Private ownership would have the same disadvantages as the private water supply. The merits of these alternatives were considered during the concept formulation period . It was concluded that the most acceptable method of sewage disposal was by connection to a municipal facility. The CVCIVD long range plans called for treatment of wastes from the project area . They have since received State and Environmental Protection Agency approval for construction of a sewage treatment plant at Cook Street . (104) Roads - Roads could be developed in a conventional method outside private PRD ownership. In this case, maintenance and operational costs would rest with the public Road Depart- ment of Riverside County. This would result in less mainte- nance and operation costs to the residents of the Desert Squire Ranch and a greater cost burden to the public as a whole. Police - Security would be totally placed on the public law enforcement agencies if the conventional subdivision develop- ment was used . This would result in more cost to the public with less cost to the Desert Squire Ranch residences. It would also result in. less security to Desert Squire Ranch with greater incidence of theft and vandalism. Additional men and equipment would be required by the public law enforce- ment agencies . Schools - The schools would most likely have greater demand upon facilities if conventional subdivisions were developed instead of PRD condominium living units . A higher percentage of full-time younger residents with school age families tend to occupy conventional developments, while a higher percentage of retired or part-time residents in the older age group own PRD condominiums. Conventional population densities average 3 .5 persons per unit contrasted with a PRD use of 2 .1 persons. (i .e. 1000 units of conventional = 3500 persons, with PRD = 2100 persons) . (105) Goods and Services - This demand would vary with the type of development . An alternate conventional plat would produce approximately the same or slightly less demand than the pro- posed project . If a development were built to the allowable limits of the existing zoning, demand would increase by approximately 2 1/2 times more than the Desert Squire Ranch plan . Habitat - This would be considerably different if conventional methods were employed . Partioning of the land equally dis- tributes all open space onto the individual lots. While in PRD, residents are clustered, thus allowing large blocks of common open space . This results in larger open areas, increase of spaciousness, views, wildlife habitat and broader, more comprehensive landscaping planning. Parks - This is a public responsibility under conventional platting, while the PRD concept creates an abundance of open space recreational facilities using private funds. I ( 106) APPENDIX LIST OF EXHIBITS i BIBLIOGRAPHY RESOURCE AND REFERENCE PERSONNEL vi LIST OF EXHIBITS A Vicinity Map B Jurisdictional - Riverside County C Location, U.S.G.S. D Boundary URBAN LIMITS F Preliminary Master Plan - Desert Squire Ranch F1 Average Daily TRAFFIC FLOW 1970 F2 Average Daily TRAFFIC FLOW 1990 G1 URBAN FORMS - Preliminary Cove Communities General Plan G2 Portion of Preliminary Cove Communities General Plan G3 Preliminary General Plan - Legend H Zoning Map (Portion of Cathedral City-Palm Desert District.) I CONDITIONS OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT J Preliminary Master Phasing Plan - Desert Squire Ranch K1 Air Pollution Chart - General District Emissions K2 Air Pollution Chart - Specific Distribution Emissions K3 Air Pollution Table L Life Zones Near Palm Desert M1 Birds of the Living Desert Reserve M2 Mammals of the Living Desert Reserve M3 Reptiles of the Living Desert Reserve N Potential Density Comparisons - Desert Squire Ranch LOS ANGELES COUNTY MILEAGE SCALE ' SAN FERNANDO VALLEY "z7 av R0. _ - . - . 0 5 10 PD 3p 40 j . `Pasadena Araif R0. SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 66 •aSan Bernardino JURIS0ICTIO1` A6 _ ' {atV EFa1® UiUTY A ss a Angeles Redlands f ` .1 -. +7s'b aP Ontano �.�,{>oq ue5uttront k �Bannin8 Ca6azon �agte my - s *° :, r 3 Long Ol 91� © d _c • . -. RIVERSIDE COUNTY cr Reach nt .March Force Ba a .c 09 9 Santa Ana. tl�rh p1n'n j :©52n lauP m SPring 9^, s Hemet A @ Inch '' `! Desart Cehter • •r f sg ••• _ '3 COUNTY / - I 3�f iq�� aT c la n "a 3 e r z l0 Pt oemx, `� `a�l v / i � -y r �• ti .��t r r CALIIF Iro a6 +�a IMPERIAL-COUNTY A R 1 Z O N A p s - y Escondido `I h -SAN DIEGO COUNTY N F Brawley 4 " 80El Centro - -" 8D San Diego Mexixicali M E n I C 0 Phoenix;m REGIDPJ.O'.L ViCHVIFY fVlwP �Crving Riverside County is the key in the state that has experienced greater growth than any other in the nation in the last ten years. Riverside business and industry enjoy same-day delivery to the West's Southern California, overnight to northern California and other western states. Railroads: Southern Pacific, Santa Fe, Union Pacific Largest Market Airlines: Western, Bonanza, Los Angeles Airways (Helicopters) Truck Lines: Up to 39 regular and irregular common carriers, interstate and intrastate service. Highways: Interstate 10, U.S. 60, 95, 395; State 71, 74, 79, 86, 91, 111, 195. 41 .-� LOS .ANGEI.ES�COUNTY gg _ _ , _ }- { ' ^`" MILEAGE SCALE SAN FERNANDO VALLEY .�• 395 20 30 a.e RR SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY'. r• ,� •e! Pasadena AT ESF 0.R .1 .Ls'[ f t • ` - •ban Be{nardino - 1 - _ &0 Rg 1 i edlands, • Los Angeles f • R .r. _ � . . »n •t sf +1�.{� 4p �Ontario y - 1 . '� f' •' 1. Long Beath• -,-. K �, , A ! - , � -.�. � � Dpl a. � '.` ;1. . D,p -. �Same Aw y � .' T tY-,a •` /-, � �,R'' �• •�. GF COUNTY ! 1 �'• ' V y •�ye. �' ' Jq, '� �F t .1Cj. _ �t l..i� -w.� J too - Desert Squire Ranch sP IMPERIAL COUNTY A R I Z O N A•._ �� RR .y. -J.Y t - - 'l•. •iR ` �FstaMi� SAN DIEGO COUNTY !. ., Brawley . 80 - El Centro i _ '• . fi t- x• - , 1 ' � OSan Diego �F c f. ��y+ 9.✓; '' -�'e7 1•f�, ' ..�. - ` >r" -" Firms-n-..r..�.+rn�"^"Y ~ ^Mex call, - _M E.X I C O3 � �""f ��'"• ! + t!„ " �_y i. .�v♦KH DI 1•• !�>.� to 'a ?✓fib "t r. a i.K� .s- e,L vA�.2�� i' . B.. 19.JJL1W� 6- x n" 1p 14 F ]3 �l' 18 1] �� n.�` p� 1a v T' 'J 1.3 . . ( �I �h Palams •° � � _ io!'�—/ R N X�� H`dd�x pip p AS FOIO POIp AMOM •i' `� _ .I x F. V' •I 'WetP! 336 ...X �L � CI LI ENT A f.OA�CALIENTE ae p WI �ryf M. i x X X � X AN 23 INm AN 19 20 - 2]" 22 23 29 ION REEF.RV AiION WOnI•� 3♦p�.. O\ p 9• /]I 3p9 aN AGOA CAWF.STE I• aaP Sq�O ^ .. ... {{�� 9 1261AN 25 QUO . `- 3h�\ "ee 29 '4 u'q} 28^ 27 26 25 nESF xe ATtox ' -� �J��tQ CV i cy - lChadeBch it �� vp __ __r 1'. e LIEN'TE2. l ` S�ti J AL•i o \ sese' �II�3 36 31 32 aee..Y 3 35 36 Es T_ N W �w 1so 3' r ~\ N 2' e♦7Ik. . i i 6 s .9. `i 2 1. 1 C]fyG. AVENUE 40- a. Th ° SERT SQUI RANCH l'GI n --- r�o wi 12 r� 7 10 11 1 12 w 1 12 11•--�� 7 v - S" 1 z e I�` 111 / \� , \.. I ♦,J WPII '. � 101 _ Ty�sIsd �v. �s Landirig Field _Wate/ 'RanchoN '�"e, i �--ib— ' 1a'\�� 14 13L 'L7� 1 Mirage �1, - �' C'°�I, t �� :�f�j�at `-moo ° n - O` r 0 20 .s�ti ❑ .. \ . p :.S�l� f ,�V' V� 0o art c LEI a ( t�°�RDA ai well 1 b f air u� II yi. 23 II-w 24 LK a 1s1 .• p. zz F44 i F dean�c I' t9ells r �y 7�' �m © { A r: �l• t \ 1 „\�")S' ` a',�--?t ice.- �, y ._ w41 F=L� •, II:Palm Desert ."•)�'�� ,�i�1 Sl� =-.-��-� O G� �,- o O. V oEd�� �N o 0o vJ�1`. V ����jf� W.tey 29 -wm 28 } o \ V% $ Tj tiE�.�..�{ i'9��)�S��'''f.vj�*M�...i�`.�A��rf�(�l�}b w°f\i•�t'ef ���'.3.s6-� -VT�_�.�1 ?31aa_.\viaAl,\. •••W.tIe,r� �32 �� � . 1­11a _ IUUUU3° � r RLps ' e YY usT _.Re Ci.�1(( �°°�\. ��ti�• .y lli:_ 4 /• d., 1 n r`D JJ . r�\�Sk`aeu a>a%��„�,b"•�'}Y c w"�T 4ec�`=��; $a z :^� a�,a� a•\ce , �� ?,F m .c e`.^' x"'•a,. v �s�§F=�e ��s?a ��'°.a`q+��€ 5z a•�r §ekA� i�'�' � E�t,a�ggA��." a`«c�F`�::, ,. �f�a �' fir} � z, 5�x Y�rs�x� s k;•�S4« �� . #kRq��E° S aY"xb�`� 'fe� E #E���" r`�<Te$� ,ES \i' .� w € 'E�r�����'�3a L/kx�4 �$ 3 �,� �,s,� iw �' �u�' ': .•�' � a r � Fpcs R °%� � _ : .f �� 5� g")fs§fs z '� Ys: # •§t �#'� s # r x `#[#'>r f# § i 3 �, x s4E E<�' i� v §� i� s, e �„ ,\� yyE'..Ai''.3FydEAy� E IE i 'a\a �.Ea`�'. ��.ad3,Ei et4 L•= Ti $ v,, Fr'�F sr ate' •�,� ;s� : �. �:.w d e+tsi �..f � ° °s s:s , d' ,fi 01, 5 � is�\sY ., � s 3""""EEEE ss` g �� sy. e°� �' x�t � ',a $• �s �. �#-\:¢s`..;,��,q xo ON�41 &� E i i• r �. "�I s\Y'���gg�� �«`F 5�c. t, �£L 5� b' 3 P4K `�y�' % rya F i °%'\�� « \�Y#�G�'.i� � ab �`� a, •�� ��• e �Sr�"Ar y`ax x3E�� # .,3� e� . IISE�45r�' ; � E d •�� F.l"i s � �$ sa'�.,1. s.� �� ° \ ��s� ,� 3 .. �. � •�� � ekie `f 4 ° �£ ��' to � 8;q.. R �''a��`� i „u '� qx �• jai� hF' � R i S•vy 34 : ah `# �>�a11•,,3,, S. ; G f+p c y wu t ibX��e�s g�N.P.. `°i�{'� t a . e�pgh �'ay�a8`�G � \•s, '_ r� �� �3 yzia,r`4'�A k] •& x E3R e,x'�a,�s,�a� � ' Y \ . P��i=�c"5,� `e� L '£ m•*ea^Ev f;2 ��g �E § � a a �? 1, ����Fax �e&4n a a. � `4.,`.'4 '•'. �'� eSE?�K.e•veCS`rs'7£' 44ER�ttevRs:. e ��D &`€F SR}a.r��� '=S aF ae .s ylTgzra »� s'AM,�AxaE a'etk<E ee3 x,L<,s4e34F f a u � .^�� Y°�&& ":�veR,ffH�iIIz mu ��� � 1 « II 8 ='. 's �Y1'- 6C 3� \a> 4 ♦ Sq�x. a�.R Y'y St�a =£a>�� Fa � r � G Re e'k't", � y �°p 9x'3'a��=T €Y'.�aF ,�� Ej x �e(., 3t IR �pp�E o lM v3'.e° a 3 .�i' "rise �� �€t � `•Yf��ofL�{irt4'F b; F'c"S .� b'F � �„ n $�S.+' 'a&a �gc\a�,�,°E�?„;(,,aA ''�'.�e �3«\`.F .i .4 � r#.`a`e8,. 7• sRn�rLS"A,`�:'R�'#`�i$ i>n�Ks�.�2 �&zEi�'x ! .� �-,"aq,_ ,s"'� s�.a x za a. r-• - n: �"-. ro�q �•,: �' '- r - Yj( 11•:' - CT�� ____•_•. .�.ems -� •v �l 1 .',l:A• .lid is •t' w� •n^1,;y�.1llx � �~_ 1 •.� ••• ��I/�` MS`%•v<<` Y• � - j TJ..L„ IsIt ��• K •'n� i a -; f 11 r r'.. ti � � - �!7"t •'t �T'.1�-.-.;wt� <'('y •f'L�,,; � {:� � �! � I i �C v� _ �r•yyyy���• 4 )/._ y L e" �i1K •r�.r • � 'Y Ir • 2 \Y r1 vT \ • I l c • y� •• j �.� � i •1�_J T' •� •/ 4 '� - *•n7 • •}� u. � «f I� ' rJ��i`� t VV� � • - • wl•''I� ••ur�•V �(� /v ) 6 � r '� {��� •�. �:� J �j) I. C Q ,r { • 1• l._ w • /f' :J_JI �� S/•_'� • `T • Y. ♦ � Jll r� •A V• L- '1' V : L •�'I' •� , • Ir \•� �r • r.t f � i�` f•� .y�, ' 1 �•;'IY �w=�y. ♦� 1 �t'11 �����. L, ILL .-. n 1 • •'• rL • .Lr' —l�r� .r ••_ Ial -i1�� Fi• fi. r�•w� ♦+•J• i^ 1��1 � w \{ r• ... s � C j♦+Cr 7. ��� 1 �. HOW ORIM PN t\ l �= lea. � ^} •�• �7.,.� • ' �� •. ��'"�'\ -��� � - � •'•...:Lam'•, p �r.•'.•3,, �,�. �;:.:, • �`- . . ��.,'fir � �' t.�: ♦ l Jr l••„u 6 46 is .�� .I . . �:,Y��`'7 . . •Is i..�`• ••'. is � � ���: �I ..I A4. l A•�� 1f�tiN ;a TRAFFIC FLOW MAP Sep Oly I I .u. tir 1970 TRAFFIC VOLUMES FqS g,,—,,,?•--p— e rqr� SOURCE RIVERSIDE COUNTY ROAD DEPARTMENT F 9 300i. �... �\ 9.710 RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT -� �0 CATHEDRAL CITY "=^ ... .o �3wSnrLi:E n i p e ° r• \ pp xg BIG ilD '. Npo%\ un C } y ✓Is „o. IpC RANCHO 1/00 MIRAGE •�,�,4�J� 11,900 .f'NO, III _110,900 .............. gE CITY OF .5.'a9'B�vO�N✓yWM� 8 Y DESERT INOIAN WELLS [.Efi...i •.. 74.- ....,., .... .......... - ID ..': I , I I flI` i, 1 I I y Exhibit F1 C,uo,,,V 7- C 0 fvj�v'jl U Z9 171 L-'S G E Nm EZ A L ESL N TRAFFIC FLOW MAP 7! 1990 TRAFFIC VOLUMES RSl SOURCE RIVERSIDE COUNTY ROAD DEPARTMENT 00- -A N" 2UOOC 500 RIVE ASIDE COUNTY ll�NI41NG 01✓.NI.EPNT 00 "?I 61, CArHrDRAi'; "NvN,- 0" IN, elry r A19, 0., RANCHO 0 MIRAGE ' 7177, To 2 1,966j NO. I I I llf�NULI cIr 000.1 PALM f or INDIAN WELLS ` .... .. .......... ,aE �E J: ........... .... A Exhibit F2 URBAN FORMS COVE COMMUNITIES GENERAL PLAN EXISTING 1970 PROPOSED 1990 SCATTERED DEVELOPMENT ( I'; tl � � f 0 E [N[ ! qCp.[[. O a AxI. [ ..I'llf ...D. . I x aP. I I- CITY or 0 URBAN AREA Q URBAN AREA 1 m[vROPmI CITY 01 (DEVELOPED) PAL Si[w[J' PALM ID,....I O A A NON-URBAN REA O NON-URBAN AREA 10 Ex EP.[ AREA IOP[N aB C AR 1 l 4 iJ ♦CHt:ax cOV ITT R C n IIILD. RiVC I 8 r PALM P PLLY 1 0[aui 0A[Ri�. nn or / or InPi.x w[uJ (l cux wuLs l 1 L—._.L—a LA 0.1. 1 PROPOSED 1990 PROPOSED 1990 INCREMENTAL DEVELOPMENT CONCENTRATED DEVELOPMENT 1 0 x [ia A I 0 E ApF A gPLOr[[i CITY oe Q URBANE AREA nn o. Q URBAN a REA i DI PALM SPa0' - p♦LY J,R0, DEVEL i O NON-URBAN FAREA O NOVNFXRBAN AREA - ,L CITY . <♦CITY F clr. �__�_�__ - _ CITY � PxnE —1 .,. --------- I:PAl. ITT AM W[LLIT J CITY W[LLa }[ L.0V x LA 0 I(tp 111� i Ei i i .L RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT G Exhibit Gl Nor m — m M � ra T " No M � 1 Z Eisenhower ,:.: Medical.'`.::::.:" Center •:` y .,:. ' COUNTRY : . CLUB m . . W to . . . . . .... . . : : : . . ... : . ar. " : . " n � . . . DESERT':.; :.... . . . . .. . . . . . .. e. WIN� f y kNC" o r•z ` ..v., .. . . :• . . . ... . ......! . .. . :.•r.v:} Q r . . .. . . ... . . . . . . ..PO I ................ ................................................................. � : : ' •n.. x ttt...,3.,. :: :............................ •i •• :::::::::::::::::::::::: : 44 !:: AA! :•MAGNESIA: `.FA•LLS" :`i'� ' •DR: ""�...-^--•-------"�:::::::::::• .:w�..riii :. , ..... :a ..:-... .............. . .:::.' is; .;t 7. ::irii:caaai::::..... ::> .............. :'t.r.t.e.x Q ... ...................... .-.............. ... .,:.. ............................................... .............. ...............::::::::: o e.9e o.. .•.•:...........................� • K" :O the D sert:e .......... . . . . . . . :r y. ... . . . . . . . :o ......... ` . r v C�n fin::::::::€ ; ; ; � ; ;;�� � _ x :Z r :::: v{� r ::O ^ : r ............... : :: E w. ... . . . . . . . . . . .....=':; r r :. •. :Q f •r .....0 1 ........................:::: v C S EL PASEO i :{}:r !. •.; �c'S{;:}}}•��{•}} . l• d ••A.:•• .} .. •::Y:nt:RrL I ri r W r O } :.. :. . . .. . . . r t.f ............. •.... Exhibit E G LAND USE UNITS PER GROSS ACR VERY LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (0-3 ) LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (3-5) MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (5-10) % • HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (10-20) ® GENERAL COMMERCIAL KU0 COMMUNITY SHOPPING CENTER c CONVENIENCE SHOPPING CENTER (NOT SHOWN) t TOURIST COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL PARK PUBLIC FACILITIES :] PUBLIC FACILITIES e ELEMENTARY SCHOOL m MIDDLE SCHOOL h HIGH SCHOOL f FIRE STATION LIBRARY cc CIVIC CENTER n NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS c COMMUNITY PARKS C REGIONAL PARKS OPEN SPACE & CONSERVATION ® WATERCOURSE & EQUESTRIAN ROUTES f - OPEN SPACE Exhibit G3 & WATERSHED SF-'IONS R-5 a R-2 A R-2-6000 46C CZ 1434 L.ANE h i 11 R-3 +rF R-A z -rze R 3-75 R-5 c R- 1-20 DESERT SQUIRE RANCH IV ER W - 1 S 7DRM 7 0 0 R- 1 -20 W4rFR w_, R-3 1 A,Gry \, R - 1 + r R-2A \ P 205 R - T P O 5n P m Z ]SJ�+ W �a rn e o R.3 Sp na m n rn R- 2 C N .N VULM1 Gf Uurt NO0 t� D r n RI w D a- F _ MIMOSA OR ;�n m P N > F5140nR-1 ARSOIEDA AVE a ? -� R-I R-I R-I R-1 ? m EXHIBIT vR- 1HRANCHO R p S� N , r w GLORIANA DR O rN if!' m cored A 44 TN AVER m',�.R-I - R-2 R-2 s r �R- 1 _� J 'S— —ROSA WAY -3 R�2 R- 2 ` R- 2 w u If SSR_1ssp-1 + 1" SAN—Nic o As RAV2� R- 2 R 2 R R-2 CONDITIONAL USE CASE NO. 1450-E EAST AREA PLANNING COUNCIL Consolidated Land Investment Co. CONDITIONS Planned Residential Development and September 21, 1972 Real Estate Sales Office Cathedral City - Palm Desert District 1. The development of the property shall conform substantially with that as shown on plot plan marked Exhibit "A" "B" "C" "D" and "E" on file with Conditional Use Case No. 1450-E in the office of the Riverside County East Area Planning Council, unless otherwise amended by the following conditions. 2. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, for any condominium structure, a subdivision shall be recorded conforming substantially with said Exhibit "A" except that building permits for not more than 4 structures may be issued for models prior to such recordation and only after a tentative sub- division map has been approved by the Planning Commission. 3a. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contemplated by this approval, the applicant shall first obtain permits and/ or clearance from the following public agencies: Department of Public Health Road Department Department of Fire Protection (Perris) Coachella Valley County Water District Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be pre- sented to the Land Use Division of the Department of Building and Safety at the time of the issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated here- with. 3b. Fire protection shall be provided as follows: 1. Install standard # 701 fire hydrants in accordance with Riverside County Ordinance # 461 so that no building in this planned development is more . than 250 feet from a hydrant, by way of street and driveway centerline. Fire hydrants shall not be located° closer than 25 feet to any building. 2. Provide 750 GPM fire flow for a 2 hour duration in excess of domestic supply for Phase 1; for Phase 2, 1000 GPM; for the remainder of the Project, 1500 GPM for 5 hour duration. Water system (pipes & valves) shall be designed for a 1500 GPM fire flow for 5 hour duration. The developer shall provide standby fire equipment hookup and fitting$ on irriation system and lake standpipes for fire equipment hookup. 3. ThL water system plan shall show that the design of the water system is in accordance with the requirements of Conditional Use Case No. 1450-E. 4. Submit to the Riverside County Department of Fire Protection four copies of the water plan for review. Upon approval, two copies will be sent to the Riverside County Department of Building and Safety, Land Use Division. S. The buildings shall be constructed so that each unit has an area sep- aration wall. Exhibit I i Conditional Use Case No. 1450-E Page 2. 4. Construction of the development permitted hereby may be done progressively in stages, provided adequate vehicular access is constructed for all dwelling units and further provided that such stage development conform substantially with the intent and purposes of this approval for the pro- vision of open areas, recreation facilities, and off-street automobile parking. 5. Prior to recordation of the final subdivision map, the applicant shall submit to the Department the following documents which shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Department that the total project will be developed and maintained in accordance with the intent and purposes of the approval: a. The document to convey title b. Covenants and restrictions to be recorded C. Management and maintenance agreement to be entered into with the owners of the units of the project The approved documents shall be recorded at the same time that the subdivi- sion map is recorded. Said documents shall contain provisions for ownership or the option to residential unit owners to use the arts & crafts center, tennis and riding club facilities, open space, golf course, and other ameni- ties on payment of fees and subject to rules prescribed for their use. 6. A management company with the unqualified right to assess the owners of the individual units for reasonable maintenance costs shall be established and continuously maintained. The management company shall have the right to:- lien the units of the owners who default in the payment of their assessments. Such lien shall not be subordinate to any encumbrance other than a first deed of trust, provided such deed of trust is made in good faith and for value and is of record prior to the lien of the management company. 7. 16' wide "Emergency Roads", with 24' clearance of shrubbery, shall be pro- vided on a progressive basis, as shown on Exhibit "A" with phasing of the emergency roads according to a plan approved by the Planning Director, subject ' to review by the East Area Planning Council, Other phasing shall follow sub- stantially that as shown by Exhibit "A". 8. Curbs and gutters shall be installed on all private streets and drives within the project. 9. Street trees shall be planted along all county road frontages in accordance with Street Tree Planting Ordinance No. 457.19. A landscaping, grading, light, ..menities, trash storage, walkway layout, and irrigation plan shall be submitted to the Planning Director for approval prier to issuance of a building permit. The landscape plan shall include a substantial number of full-size trees. A minimum of one tree per unit , no smaller than the height of the unit adjacent thereto, shall be planted and maintained. Parapet walls shall be no less than the height of any air conditioning equipment placed on the roofs of the units. The building permit when issued shall include the grading, lighting, amenities, trash storage, walkways, •swimming pool equipment, and irrigation systems. No final inspection or occupancy shall be given by the Building Department to this project until the afore- mentioned approved plans and construction shall have been completed. C .iditional Use Case No. 1450-E Pale 3. 10. The sewerage disposal system shall be designed so as to readily facilitate connecting with a community trunk line and wet sewers shall be installed. Plans for their installation shall be submitted to and approved by the Coachella Valley County Water District prior to issuance of a building permit. j11. This approval shall be used within 3 years after final proceedings before the Board of Supervisors, otherwise it shall become null and void and of no effect whatsoever. By "use" is meant recordation of a subdivision map and beginning of construction of permanent buildings. AGREEMENT I accept and agree, prior to use of this permit or approval, to comply with all of the conditions set forth, and understand that the Office of Building and Safety will not issue a building permit, or allow occupancy on the use permitted until this signed confirmation, in quadruplicate, has been received by the Planning Department. Date Applicant's Signature Date Owner's Signature T II ,Aux --UNIT PHA 6s v UN1, A 11�==� �•I � �i'/�':3 i PHA SAL AS A x w.• I w R AC.RANPI TRADING - �� (. PHASE UNIT ACRES UIA AWANITIES I 140 Sa xG amxs minls II 149 aT 4.0 "DORCLeNaff.STARUP III 118 ae ze A Cs 124 IV 1xA ae az aMxn;A CRAPT$ ererous coums SUB TOTAL ASS 1TS za V BAD aB 11.2 TRAON:POST TOTAL 1.071 118 lT f AR I'1 A ^;' ` v'L� `x - -G^AREDJBN�LAPIs. � B � - DESERT SQUIRE RANCH GOLF AND TENNIS CLUB Cr HASE y PALM SPRINGS RIVERSIDE COUNTY CALIFORNIA ^ C. A BIORY i. C. B Y Iu r -, 'y s �\ U SSA 25 � a1 —DREAMERS DEVELOPMENT c..v.xr vn.o. v.. v.L. .ese.. u.roxx.nTea ti 400 �' , 1✓EV'VEIECLE MH(M 41R POL-LU' !Oil CONTR'CL D!STRICT RIVERS;DE CG!iti f'i' 3575--11th STREET rA!,LL RIVERSIDE, CALIF. 92501 GALEN R. KINLEY, DIRECTOR STATIONARY - TRANSPORTATION SOURCES - _ SOURCES r AS OF JANUARY 1971 AS OF JANUARY 1971 1 a — 7 Cr µ N PIE SLICES show breakdown of current air contaminant emissions. Stationary and Trar.sportctior. sources daily average 919 Tani pa, day, AIR POLLUTION CCI11 ROL DISTRICT RIVERSIDE COUNTY 3575--11th STREET MALL RIVERSIDE, CALIF. 92501 GALEN. R. KINLEY, DIRECTO. STATIONARY TRAWSRCRTATIO�N SOURCES SOURCES AS OF JANUARY 1971 AS OF JANUARY 1971 ARGICULTURAL AIRCRAFT INDUSTRIAL RAILROADS r_ I FUEL COMEUSTION c, _- -- I � IiI� IIIII III INCINERATION MOTOR MOTOR VEHICLES PIE SLICES show breakdown of current air contaminant - PIE SLICES show breakdown of current air contaminant emissions. Stationary source daily average 93 Tons emissions. Transportation sources daily average B26 per day. Tons per day. _ AIR POLLUTION CCTITROL DISTRICT GALEN R. RINLEY, DIRECTOR. - RIVERSIDE COUNTY 3575-I1,h STREET MALL RIVERSIDE,CALIF. 92501 AS OF JANUARY 1971 AIR CONTAMINANT EMISSIONS DAILY AVERAGE TONS/DAY EMISSIONS IF THERE - EMISSIONS PREVENTED AS THE CURRENT EMISSIONS WERE NO CONTROL PROGRAM RESULT OF THE CONTROL PROGRAM TONS/DAY - TONS/DAY - - TONS/DAY HYDROCARBONS PAR- HYDROCARBONS PAR- - HYDROCARBONS PAR- y S 0 U R C E S E I PAR SO CO NO 7ICU- SO CO NO TICU- SO CO <TOTAL R':AC- NO 2 TOTAL REAL- x 2 ''TOTAL REAC- x 2 x LATES IATES '!AYES TIVE TIVE TIVE ~"V S S T A T I O N A R Y S 0 U R C E S kM INDUSTRIAL Chemical - - 0.52 - - - - 0.42 - - - - 0.10 - - 0.10 ID' Metallurgical - - - - 6.30 - - - - 5.00 - - - 1.30 - - -1.10 Ih Ct Mineral - - 23.90 - - 19.00 - - - - 4.90 - - 4.90 .x Petroleum 11.90 - - - - 5.80 - - - - 6.10 - - - 6.I0 W Organic Solvents 13.67 - - - - 6.67 - _ _ - 7.00 - - - - 7,00 INCINERATION 29.52 8.81 21.05- 0.44 78.60 14.32 6.31 16.75 0.24 45.00 15.20 2.50 4.30 0.20 33.60 55.80 FUEL COMBUSTION - 0.22 13.42 2.98 4.12 - 0.12 9.42 2.38 2.32 0.10 4.00 0.60 1.80 - 6.50 AGRICULTURE 8.39 0.77 11.82 0.24 10.50 4.09 0.57 9.42 0,14 6.00 4.30 0.20 2.40 0.10 4.50 11.50 TOTAL STATIONARY 63.70 23.00 66.60 4.80 89.10 31.00 16.30 53.00 r2.70 51.00 32.70 6.70 13.60 2.10 38.I0 93.2 T R A N S P O R T A T I O N S O U R C E S i •Source Bulk Sales of Fuel MOTOR VEHICLES 104.00 50.0 10.0 ].20 600.0 No M/V . -CONTROL PROGRAM - H&S 39012 f0,40 50.0 - 10.0 3,20 600.00 767.2 RAILROADS 2.00 9.86 2.85 0.45 11.0 1.00 17.86 ( 2.25 10.25 7 1.00 2.00 0.60 AIR CRAFT. _ 7.10 4.40 4.70 - 35.20 No A/C . -CONTROL PROGRAM-PL91-604-BII-233 e7.10 4.40 4.70 TOTAL TRANSPORTATION 113.1 64.26 17.55 3.65 646.2 1,00 I-J,86 2.25 1 0.25 7 112.1 56.40 15.30 J.40 639.2 826.4 GRAND TOTAL 176.8 87,26 84.15 I 8.45 7JSJ 71.0 24.16 55.25 2.95 58.0 144,8 63.I0 28.90 5.50 677,7 919.6 -._ NOTE% - Hydrocarbons = Hydrocarbons and other aryaaic gases. NO. = Csides of n"trogen. SO Sulfcr dioxide. CO • Carbon 1b:-9zid "Reactive" means those hydcecarbens which are ph0ta:hemicai:y LIFE ZONES NEAR PALM DESERT 3 Three distinct life zones are recognized in the Deep Canyon transect:Lower Sonoran,from sea level to about 3,500 feet elevation; Upper Sonoran, extending upwards to about 6,300 feet;and Transition Life Zone,on the peaks to 8,000 feet.Nine habitats lie within these life zones.-They are shown diagrammatically here,with a few of the mammals representing each habitat. TRANSITION LIFE ZONE 7i1 rorr+ays .rr, '� rrr,rw �.,P►�.�o .Yry�i ?4T. UPPER $ONORAN LIFE ZONEAriQ.' _ 91 LOWER SONORAN LIFE ZONE 411 .,o„K, K df05 y yra y, Desert a.K, Squire Ranch Source: The Desert Museum Exhibit L BIRDS OF THE LIVING DESERT RESERVE MAY, 1971 '. To date, 61 species of birds have been reported for the Living Desert -- Reserve'. In this preliminary list, no attempt is made to comment on their abundance or status within the Reserve. We would appreciate your observations and comments in order that this list be made more - - cooip!ete. Common names conform with the A.O.U. checklist of North American . Birds, 5th edition,,1957. - - tihe only rccWicd observations of birds on the Reserve are from the Sprng of 1968,the Fall and Winter of 1970 and Spring of 1971. Thus, re mpecl the list is far from complete. VOLTURES,HAWKS,AND EAGLES HUMMINGBIRDS Cooper's Ilawk Black-chinm d THRASHERS WARBLERS(Continued) li Red-toiled Ilawk Ilumminghird Nfockinghird 'Pownscri Warbler -- Sp.orow hawk Cost;i s liuuuuingbird California Thrasher 11crurit Warbler QUAIL TYRANT FLYCATCHERS Crissal Thrasher NlacCillivray's Warbler C:nniu is Quail Western Kingbir(I BLUEBIRDS - Ycllowthroat Ash-tluwduei Plyeatcher Wilsons Wnrblcr DOVES \launtain Bluebird \Viote-winged I)ove Says nond'sc WEAVER FINCHES I T:uunuuul's Flycatcher CNATCATCHERS AND KINGLETS NRw rniug I)ove Western Flycatcher 111urbtuiled Gnatcatchar lJouse Sparrow Ground Dove Western Woal Pewee Ruby-crowned Kinglet BLACKBIRDS AND ORIOLES ROADRUNNERS SWALLOWS SILKY FLYCATCHERS Hooded Oriole iloadmrmer Burn Swallow Phainopeple Brewer's Blackbird GGATSUCKERS SHRINES AND STARLINGS Brown-headed Cowbird Common Niela RAVENS hawk Common Raven Loggerhead Sluike TANAGERS SWIFTS K'ighl�nwk. Starling - Western Tanager _ SWIFTS CHICKADEES AND TITMICE VIREOS GROSBEAKS,FINCHES, Whit,-throated Swift Verdin Warbling Vireo AND SPARROWS N aun's Srrift WRENS WARBLERS Black-headed Grosbeak WOODPECKERS Ilouse Wien Blue Grosbeak Orangr-crowned Warbler ' house Finch Red,ier-h cd Flicker Roe,, 's Wren - - Nashville Warbler Lesser Goldfincb - La,hirr-backed\Voalpeeknr Rock Wren Yellow Warbler Lark Sparrow Andubon's Warbler Rufous-crown«l Sparrow Black-throated Gray Brc vcr's Sparrow -_. .. Warbler Whife-crowned Sparrow NOTES: Published by PALM SrxiNrcs DESERT TduSrulvr PAI,ilI SPRINGS, CALIPORNIA Exhibit M1 I "MAMMAS OF TIiM SIVING D$"S'ERT RESERVE ..,;r. A'CNECKLIST . -. iha-following.check list include-those species which have been re _ <:''rnrded an the ,Living Desdt Reserve' of the.Palm Springs.Desert ,Piusc:,m and.d4nse'species�Wall can be presumed to occur on the `Reserve but have not been observedas of.May, 19/i. We would appraclato your observations and comments in order that Ihis list may be trade more.compiete. - iamnal observations indude'fhose rerorded by R. Mark Ryan in • ti> bunk. Mammals of Deep -Canyon, Colorado Desert, Caliturnia, Desert Atium: Palm Springs, Co., 1968. Other observations have 1, aade Sy ttie research staff of the Philip L 8oyd Deep Canyon Desert fe0arch Carter, University of California and by Karen Saus- uaa fovler, Resident Naturalist, Living Desert Reserve. KEY .., _ . : . ......... R 'racn da.on tho Living Desert.Reserve .D re o 'c9 m A�a'vicinity o1 the Reserve and presentedto occur them u p,c 'Wecturon the Resents butoottecorded C I C A-roruia I:eaf nosed tat,ALacrotus californicus' `U Wostctn PiLdstrellu Bat, Pipistrellw heSperus• Ii - Cactus Mouse, t,h7coyrna epkl'i vs D [] Descrt Pack not,h'eotnma lepula R ❑ .i . id Bat,An4frozous pallidus D - Q, Coyote,Canis larrai a R .: .❑ Buck-tarlc 'Jack Rabbit, Lepw caUfonrirw R 'r '.wand-tailed Ground Squirrel,CiteIIw tereticuudw IS h Cray Fox, Uroeyon cinereoargentew. U _ 0 ):it FBx,Vulpea macrotir D ArdcLipe Ground Squirrel,Citellus leucunu R " . .n Bingtall,Borsariscw-astutw U.., F j Pocket Gopher, Thornmys nottae 'R 0 Raccoon,Procyon later R Little Pocl et Mouse;Perognathw longirrembris U - O Badger, Taxidea taxw" It Long-tailccl'Pocket Mouse,Perogmthus fornmsus D ❑ Bobcat, Ltmx ru/us- U'. - .❑ S;,:r.:Diego Pocket Mouse, Perognathus fallar D y Ci r\Ievutnt Kangaroo Rat, Dipodornys merrianu - R- NOTES, (] Deer Mouse,Petomyscus m4niculatus R. ;] Canyon Decr Mouse,Pezonryscus.erinitus. 'R f . i.. ':• Y '. FMQ�VC�VY a� Y . 5t w 't"r\ 15A�.1•t SPR DSSSITY' 1VSVSEVfi q;t --s7. i , , I I i Exhibit M2 REPTILES OF THE LIVING DESERT RESERVE A CHECK LIST - To date, 20 species of reptiles have been reported for the Deep Can- yon area, 11 of which have been sighted within the Living Desert Reserve of the Palm Springs Desert Museum. The fallowing check list includes those species which have been recorded and those species which can be presumed to occur on the Reserve but have not been observed as of May, 1971, We would be interested in your obser- vations in order that this list may be made more complete. Reptile observations included in this list have been made by the re- - search staff of the Philip L. Boyd Deep Canyon Desert Research - Center, University of California and by Karen Sausman fowler, Resi- dent Naturalist, Living Desert Reserve. KEY R recorded an the Living Desert Reserve D recorded elsewhere in Deep Canyon and presumed to occur on the reserve D presumed to occur on the Reserve but not recorded ❑ Banded Rock Lizard,Streptosaurus mearnsi D - ❑ Desert Homed Lizard,Phrynosoma platyrhinos R iURTDISES ❑ Flat-tailed Homed Lizard,Phryosam mcalli U ❑ Desert Tortoise, Gopherus agassizf R ❑ San Diego Horned Lizard, Phrynosoma coronatum U LIZARDS - ❑ Western Whiptail,Cnemidoporus tigris R ❑ Banded Cecko,Coleonyx variegatus D SNAKES ❑ Cbuckwalla,Sauromalus obelus R ❑ Western Blind Snake, Leptotyphlops humi/is U ❑ Desert Iguana,Dipsosaurus dortalis R ❑ Rosy Boa,Liclwnura trivirgata D ❑ Zcbra-tailed Lizard, Callisaurus draconoides R ❑ Spotted Leaf-nosed Snake, ❑ Coachella Valley Fringed-toed Lizard,Uma inornata R Phyllorhynchusdecurtatus U ❑ Leopard Lizard,Crotaphytus wislizenit D ❑ Red Racer, Masticophis flagellum R ❑ Collared Lizard,Crotaphytus collaris D Cl Desert Patch-nosed Snake, Saluadora hexalepis U ❑ Desert Spiny Lizard, Sceloporus magWer U ❑ Gopher Snake,Pituophis melanoleucus R ❑ Long-tailed Bmsh Lizard, Urosaurus graciosus D ❑ Glossy Snake,Arizona elegans D Side-blotched Lizard, Uta stansburiana R ❑ Califomia Kingsnake,Lampropeltis getulus U ' ❑ Long-nosed Snake,Rhinochellus lecontei D Cl Shovel-nosed Snake,Chiouactis occipitalis U ❑ Night Snake,Hysiglena torquata U ❑ Lyre Snake, Trimorphodon vandenburghi U ❑ Western Diamondback Rattlesnake,Crotalus atrox U ❑ Sidewinder,Crotalus cerastes R ❑ Red Diamond Rattlesnake,Crotolus Tuber D ❑ Speckled Rattlesnake,Crotalus mitchoUi U KDTESr Published by PALM SPRINGS DESERT MUSEUM PALM SPRINGS,CALIFORNIA it Exhibit M3 DESERT SQUIRE RANCH - POTENTIAL DENSITY COMPARISONS Zone D. U. Allowed/Acre No.Acres Dwelling Units Under Existing Zoning Allowed- Proposed Proposed/Ac R-2-6000 7.26 83 .72 607 473 5 .7 R-2-A 20+ 5 .95 119+ 58 9 .7 R-3 40+ 35 .65 1424+ 540 15 .2 R-5 -- 97.22 --- TOTAL 9.6 222. 54 2150 1071 4. 8 Exhibit N BIBLIOGRAPHY (1 ) "_merican Society of Civil Engineers, Urban Planning Guide, Manual No. 49, 1969 . (2) Board of Education, Financial and Statistical Data 1966-1972 for Desert Sands Unified School District, Feb. 29, 1972 . (3 ) Board of Education Projection for Desert Sands Unified School District, March 1, 1972 . (4) California Division of Mines and Geology, Geologic Map of California, Santa Ana Sheet, 1965 . ( 5) California :Dater Resources Control Board, Regulations Pertaining to Waste Discharge Reports and Requirements, California ^.dministrative Code, Title 23, Waters, 1970. (6) California slater Resources Control Board, Slater Quality Control Plan (Interim) West Colorado River Basin 7-A, June, 1971 . (7) City of Palm Springs Department of Planning and Development, Palm Hills General Plan Study, December 28, 1970. ( 3) Coachella Valley County Water District, Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan, March, 1967. (9) Coachella Valley County lWater District, Engineering Report on Preliminary Design and Cost Estimate for Flood Control Works for the La Quinta Area, September, 1970. (10) Coachella Valley County Water District, Palm Desert Area Waste- water Study, 1966. ( 11) Coachella Valley Soil Conservation District , Coachella Valley 'find Erosion Problem, December 1967• ( 12) County of Riverside, General Plan of Highways for Riverside County, California, amended 1971. ( 13 ) County of Riverside, Ordinance DO Zoning, (latest revision) . ( 14) County of Riverside, Ordinance >1460 Regulating Subdivisions, ( latest revision) . (15) County of Riverside, Ordinance #489 Grading, 1963 . (16) County of Riverside, Road Improvement Standards and Specifi- cations, 1970. ( 17) Desert Magazine, "Deep Canyons Desert World", edited by Jack Pepper. (18) "Earthquake Country", a Sunset book, revised edition, June 20, 1971 . ( 19) "Environment , Ecology, and Economic Development in the 1970s", Palm Springs Economic Review, June 1970. (20) "Guidelines for Design Review", California Institute, American Institute of Architects, 1969. (21) Pacific Rim, Environmental Consultants Ltd . , Silver Spur, Environmental Study, June, 1972 . (22) Palm Springs Convention and Visitors Bureau, Analysis of the Palm Springs Condominium Owner, 1972 . ( 23) Palm Springs Desert Museum, Birds- - -Mammals- - and Reptiles of the Living Desert Reserve, 1971. ( 24) Riverside County Air Pollution Control District, Stationary Sources, Transportation Sources, January 1971. ( 25) Riverside County Planning Department , Cove Communities Pre- liminary General Plan, October 1971 . (26) Riverside County Superintendent of Schools, The Financial Comparison Report , 1971 - 72. ( 27) Riverside County Supervisors, County Auditor Controller, Final Budget - County of Riverside: Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 1972, June 1971 . (28) Ryan, R. Mark, Mammals of Deep Canyon, 1968. (29) State of California, Assembly Bill ;J1301, Chapter 1446. (30) State of California, Environmental Quality Act . (31) U.S. Department of the Interior, Geological Survey, Water Resources Division, Analog Model Study of the Ground Water Basin of the Upper Coachella Valley, California 1971. (32) University of California, School of Law, Berkeley, California, ;'dater Quality Control in California, Spring 1971. (33 ) Urbanomics Research Associates, Palm Springs Economic Review, June 1970. (34) Urbanomics Research Associates, Riverside County Population Projections: 1970 - 1990. (35) 1970 Federal Census . (36) 1969 Special Census, Riverside County. RESOURCE AND REFERENCE PERSONNEL California Highway Patrol, Captain L. W. Watson, Indio. California State Water Quality Control Board, Mr. Arthur Swajian, Indio. Coachella Valley County Water District, Mr. Lowell Weeks, Chief Engineer and General Manager, Coachella . Coachella Valley Recreation and Parks District, Mr. C . 0. Brewer, Superintendent , Indio. Crocker Bank, Mr. John Stiles, Manager, Palm Springs . Desert Hospital, Mr. Glen V. Bailey, Administrator, Palm Springs . Desert Sands Unified School District , Dr. Harold Schoenfeld , Superintendent , Indio. Eisenhower Medical Center, Joseph Lesser, M.D. , Chief of Staff, Palm Desert . Living Desert Reserve, Mrs . Karen Fowler, Resident Naturalist, Palm Desert . Palm Desert Chamber of Commerce, Mr. William .Hannon, President, Palm Desert . Palm Desert Disposal, Inc . , Mr. Gino Scopesi, Cathedral City. Philip L. Boyd Deep Canyon Research Center, University of California, Mr. Lloyd Tevis, Research Associate, Palm Desert . Rancho Mirage Chamber of Commerce, Mr. Robert Cordes, Director, Rancho Mirage . Riverside County Air Pollution Control District , Mr. Galen R. Kinley, Director, Riverside. Riverside County Assessor, Mr. Frank Seeley, Assessor, Riverside. Riverside County .Auditor, Mr. W. A . Ladd , Auditor-Comptroller, Riverside. Riverside County Department of Fire Protection, .Mr. James C . Major, Perris, California . Riverside County Health Department, Mr. Donald Boling, Director. of Environmental Health, Riverside. Rivers ide County Planning Department, Mr. Harry H . Schmitz, Senior Planner, Indio. Riverside County Road Department, Mr. Douglass Powell, Road Commissioner, Riverside. Riverside County Sheriff, Captain Del Fountain, Indio. Security Pacific National Bank, Mr. Emmett Connors, Manager, Palm Springs . Southern California Edison Company, Mr. Jack McFaden, District r"anager, Palm Springs . Southern California Gas Company, Mr. Robert Herd, District Manager, Palm Springs. U. S. Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service, Mr. Norman Ellam, District Conservationist, Indio . U. S. Postal Service, Mr. Arthur Montoya, former Postmaster, Palm Desert . University of California, Mr. Tom King, Archaeological Research Unit , Riverside . i WELL SITE MAINTENANCE 'WALL `` AND STORAGE BLDG.y 6' LAS LOMAS SAN REMO WALL .- " _ - ,,. u. O ss ` �L i ^ THE 6 WALL ADJOINING THE UNDEVELOPED- —__ . .s —_ _ _ --_ ~ , - • „ T =_ fy _ _ ADJOINING LAND� THE EAST WILL NOT BE BUILT IF THIS TO �h> �� .� u u _ � \ �, O - - d _." IS ANNEXED INTO THE DEVELOPMENT.IN THAT EVENT, O r BLDG. r W THEE SIDE OF SUCH .a ` _ ADDITIONAL PROPERTY. FUT r_ � LA PAZ WAY DEV. _ <WALL AREA I[JTURE r r _ a. - DEVELOPMENT , O SIER K S ADIUM G -, RA MA )RE NORTH 'AREA v HOMM _h _ . - C* COURT E x , _ r11 S ~ UR S b o , �I y- :, — C CORDOBA WAY ter{ - � . MOi� ., ;o� FUTURE H DEVELOPMENT O `AREA � � ,;. n E s G TE WALL A LL CLANCY LANE '' " SIERRA MADRE SOLWL A GOLF MAINTENANCE WELL SIBTE 6,'WALL EMERGENCY BROWN WAY` _ ,� ` Y _ < 6'WALL BLDG./AREA AND STORAGE ACCESS ONLY This master plan, as depicted, has been approved by the City o 0 - Palm Desert. The improvements c DRIVING 9s and facilities are shown here in f RANGE order to fully disclose the extent of improvements and facilities which , prov f may ultimately be included in the Monterey Country Club develop- t TYPICAL 4 O . PRIVATE ment. There is no assurance that 66 WAL JE such future improvements and RANCHO 1s tea SIDE YAR ua facilities will ewerLAS PALMAS 0 be constructed. COUNTRY ? a The total number, design, location CLUB 8W and layout of condominiums, pools and phases, unit mix and theC- 0-1-,, M R location, design and layout of recce- ational facilities may be changed r z a due to a number of circumstances, z ` including governmental °n w , "2- o A Development of Sunrise Company requirements and market demand. G r eta o ¢ 41500 Monterey Avenue, Palm Desert, California 92260 Telephone (714) 568-5924 1 - - - - -- - This plan not to exact scale. � c o e � t EO rRIMavEzA � PAs �.� _. v . . ` is Monterey Country Club is the newest The Ted Robinson-designed golf course is ` r ~ and most spectacular resort condominium community both beautiful and challenging. An abundance of ; ` w GOLF CARDS `� (2 in the Western United States. It is destined to become water, traps and contoured fairways will give you WEST COURSE = one of the desert's most valuable and beautiful round after round of fun, excitement and perhaps HOLE YARDS PAR �� ` � A L� z communities, a bit of exasperation. WELL ITSw 1W 345 4 AND � ,. As you can see, the plan allows almost Last, but by no means least, is the fact Q STo GE 4w `- o eve home within the Count Club too en out that the superior land plan at Monterey Country 2W 527 5 < WALL �w ' every p 3W 350 4 onto a beautiful green fairway, In a few instances, Club offers a very low density —including the golf - _ where a resident may wish some units are course and recreation areas there are 162 3 - - o sT y pp 5W 480 5 - :fl gam' - < ,; MAIrrrENArr available with -WToLosa the rear patio imately three homes to the acre. 6W 380 4 - q o. � BLDG. opening out onto "GELES We at Sunrise Company, sincerely hope - `► 7W 375 4 W> ;( ' - a lovely swimming RACQUET ��x that you will and as much /y�l, challenge and a .CLUB RD. 9YI0 y f• J g 8W 405 4 _ <6 WALL and companion z "'�, reurar p Iti a W d an living at Monterey Country Club as we 9W 180 3 a __ o �� TOTAL: 3204 36 — _ _ __p therapy pool. o z ?3 PALM havehave had in developing it. . _ _ - o -__ Monterey Country Club is the ultimate O -- - _ TAHQUITZ-M,CALLUM WAY ZS I desert experience. EAST COURSE © = 3w ` - - _ c - _-- 7S WHITE WATER G 3 __'' •`_ � CHANNEL RAnION RD. z rt0 •MISSION HILLS HOLE YARDS PAR - - `'� _ _ I COUNTRY CLUB 7 � =��' HIGHWAY I>1 1E 330 4 - -_ I V c . y -{. 6ai •TAMARISK p, 2E 350 4 u - C _ - ' ? x a G COUNTRY CLUB x ZO,! FRANK SINATRA DR. l0 3E 350 4 A �" DRrD - z ` o - CATHEDRAL m� � ' DESERT ISLAND• EISENHOWER 4E 180 3 � ` couNLRv MEDICAL CENTER cLu6 ;sue, ", RESTAURANT ROW THE SPRINGS• 5E 330 4 u":: _, ,_ COUNTRY CLUB COUNTRY CLUB DR. - 6ETHUNDEB385 4 COUNTRYRCLUB • SUNRISE CLANCY a 7E 532 W COUNTRY CLUB 5 GATE V Lq Y i� OLAN: W ~COLLEGE OF THE DESERT PALM DESERT p 8E r f - R - RANCHO RANCHO F, COL COUNTRY CLUB BERMUDA 195 3 HOUSE _ � ,' •' � � � " �' � MIRAGE �LAs z o r . : _;_ : .. - { - 44TH STREET p, D INDID tb 9E 350 4 GATE . , u ' - _ - _ ALCC >>, 0 B RMUDA DUNES O, _ .. �. - 's." ';* �. :'., x -_ -I a COUNTRY CLUB P HOUSE ` n vim ? e 6 WALL PALM HtcxWAY m INDIAN WELLS• x 3002 35 - : " DESERT RANCHO G AV- - ,�° . COUNTRY CLUB ¢ N . . �� „i~ Q. MARRAKESH EL DORADO COUNTRY CLUB• LAS PALMAS '�: ..„z - _ �1� COUNTRY CLUB map not to scale COUNTRY 3 S (� LA QUINTA COUNTRY CLUB• _ 6 S INDIAN WELLS LA QLIINTA 3 9. SOUTH COURSE CLUB r:: HOLE YARDS PAR - . 1S 380 4 2S 495 5 c ,J CALLS DEL VERAIV 3S 135 3 ...CCCCC .- 4S 375 4 a 5S 205 3 x 6S 500 - = 7S 350 4 8S 360 4 9S 340 4 © � "? - ` z 3140 a WELL STTF 6' LL AND STORAGE WA CASTELLANA SOUTH MAGNESIA FALLS DRIVE WELL SITE rARTIST CONCEPTION AND STORAGE WELL SITE MAINTENANCE 6'W)kLL AND STORAGE BLDG.y 6' LAS LOMAS SAN REMO WALL = . r F .., _. ^ (� T, 3s _ u \ THE 6'WALL ADJOINING THE UNDEVELOPED LAND TO z THE EAST WILL NOT BE BUILT IF THIS ADJOINING p JO NING LAND IS ANNEXED INTO THE DEVELOPMENT.IN THAT EVENT, x O BLDG:. a WAY THE EAST SIDE OF SUCH ® ADDITIONAL t WILL MOVE TO LA PAZ WAY t � NAL PROPERTY ; � .<WALL • ® � AREA izE a, u r .:.DEVELOPMENT S DI_ AREA GO SIERRA MADRE NORTH HO C* COURT _ o �a; C CORDOBA WAY ; r� r o o . FUTURE:. : .. �.✓� H MO EVE P LO MEN { T r. AREA Rg SOUTg - a 1 GATE _ :' _` / WALL HOUSE 9W l j i— c� -' c� 1 � =p �; ALL - l®1 ,A RE SO BROWN WAY � �` � - L�J SIERRA MA CLANCY LANE D A GOLF MAINTENANCE WELL SITE 6'WALL c EMERGENCY - < 6 WALL BLDG./AREA AND STORAGE ACCESS ONLY This master plan, as depicted, �� has been approved by the City of f•: �:� 0 ` Palm Desert. The improvements 95 ` c. DRIVING ; and facilities are shown here in RANGE order to fully disclose the extent of improvements and facilities which w may ultimately be included in the Monterey Countr P y Club develop- r_ �3 RIIVATE ment. There is no assurance that •r � EL�WA such future improvements and RANCHO is SYAR� S PALMA � facilities will ever be constructed. LAS PALMACOUNTRY w CLUB The total numbear, design, location g s 8W U w .� ry and layout of condominiums, pools � r ,, t,� _ E� y and phases, unit mix and the _ location, design and layout of recce- NT , , ational facilities may be changed * , Q P due to a number of circumstances, z o� a v:; r Y.,, 4 including governmental A; � p �� A Development of Sunrise Company requirements and market demand. C� 4.1 41500 Monterey Avenue, Palm Desert, California 92260 Telephone (714) 568-5924 e � r� This plan not to exact scale. �-� ©° � PASEo PRIMAVEItA _ 8S' Monterey Country Club is the newest The Ted Robinson-designed of course is G rt g f and most spectacular resort condominium community both beautiful and challenging. An abundance of GOLF CARDS -in the Western United States. It is destined to become water, traps and contoured fairways will give you U one of the desert's most valuable and beautiful round after round of fun, excitement and perhaps WEST COURSE HOLE YARDS PAR �� �� � �� z v r, communities. a bit of exasperation. 1W 345 4 © �SITE � { As you can see, the plan allows almost Last but by no means least is the fact �, �, , 2W 527 5 < WALL STORGEw4 z , o� every home within the Country Club to open out that the superior land plan at Monterey Country 3W 350 4 �_ �' p° onto a beautiful green fairway. In a few instances, Club offers a very low density -including the golf 4W 162 3 __ _ __ 7W_ where a resident may wish, some units are course and recreation areas there are approx- - -- - _ h available with 5W 480 5 - - _ _-_ -s� _ MAINTENANCE �ToLOSq the rear patio imately three homes to the acre. 6W 380 4 a BLDG. opening out onto "�FLES c p g We at Sunrise Company, sincerely hope 7W 375 4 - -- ? __ I a lovely swimming SUB Rb H`�Hwgy a that you will find as much joy, challenge and 8W 405 4 __ _ Q 1�6'WALL �lio� and coo anion z 9W 180 3 z - - I theca pool. ° reur�rd in living at Monterey Country Club as we therapy p ° z 3 PALM have had in developing it. TOTAL: 3204 36 6 rQ a - -- --� _ t z sPRiNGs --_ __- --1 --: 0 , i � Monterey Country Club is the ultimate o _ - _ - _ _ 2�,. I TAHQUITZ-McCALLUM WAY (�QSe'`"t experience. EAST COURSE F 3W - - _lJ 7 I VY CHANNEL rNEiTER RAMON[RD. p "`^^^»>«c%%% ° •MISSION RILLS Iy HOLE YARDS PAR © ;—c t� � COUNTRY CLUB 7 a . v - p HIGHWAY M 1E 330 4 U -'` - I a z ��. •TAMARISK y 2E 350 4 `, __ 0 d COUNTRY CLDB 3E 350 4 DD d, 3 Z ° FRANK SINATRA DR. -d y -_ S CATHEDRAL o J ` CITY DESERT ISLAND• . 4E 18O 3 [J" - '`. Ur `�Q D COUNTRY CLUB MEDICAL CENTER ' _ 5E 33U 4 U —�� 4 �� j ` - -—_ RESTAURANT ROW THE SPRINGS• COUNTRY CLUB COUNTRY CLUB DR. . x _. T, 6E 385 4 0 ;' \ __` THUNDERBIRD 3� t ®. �. ,4 �' [f) ®' ,.. COUNTRY CLUB SUNRISE CLAN - a -�%�;1�i, Ati ILllt-Ii 7E 532 5 �%�T a _: 3 —__ 5 v COUNTRY CLUB r GATE '"� ® .. _ O �Q • W0.' `~ . PALM DESERT F» - - h.: J-'L"*' " RANCHO ,.f�pCOLLEGE OF THE DESERT COUNTRY CLUB H BERM SE 195 3 RAN Ho CC. HOUSE _ . c I MIRAGE ;0 44TH STREET o DUNES INDIO _.� ;'z `' �' SAS 9E 350 4 .'GATE �. r".I E.' } # <-'i - w. 'tt.! O •BERMUDA DUNES �'>M AL AS t Y r; -- PALM COUNTRY Clue HOUSE n _- •y 4 6 WALL HIGHWAY m INDIAN WELLS• x 3002 35 � � ,,.: � �R � DESERT m A RANCHO . 1G a "", A---— • COUNTRY CLUB 4 N /(4 7 MAR KESH LAS PALMAS r ":�° '`� :- - - .�.. .� �P COUNTRY CLUB EL DORADO COUNTRY CLUB• 3 ma not to scale COUNTRY ? � �� �i3 3S ; . V� LA QUINTA COUNTRY CLUB r SOUTH COURSE -- bs CLUB _ � _ ��� � INDIAN WELLS LA QutrrrA HOLE YARDS PAR 1S 380 4 ; 2S 495 5 J o ` J M `c� z CALLE DEL VE ,p 3S 135 3 RANO 4w 0 m_ - - 4S 375 4 z z . 5S 205 3 4 �a _. . - �5 _ 5 6S_ _ �.. g_ < —_ _x _ w __ 8S 360 4 t) 55 ,ry. z 3140 36 a WELL SITE 6' AND STORAGE WALL ; � CASTELLANA SOUTH MAGNESIA FALLS DRIVE _ WELL SITE (ARTIST CONCEPTION AND STORAGE - II I GATE HOUSE i .:: 9 CLAN CY.LANE QQ10.D. lw � f 30 ` G 20 e �, lffD LID I 3o0P V g 300OP 30 300 0ORR !.9 30PR a � . DRIVING ` DRIVI 9s 20R P 2°� 0 300R d' p 30OR 300 A ,� t NG 20 a 3 300 A `,m 3000R 3000/ `r` RANGE _ M 30 p0 30 0 3�po t (� 210 3000 < 3000R 30R O ZppR 3WOR 300 30OR 20R 30R e� d j ^/ d 30pR G C� 3o0R 300 F�1 Q w 30 � d 200 � g 30W A 30R 20°R i 30 > 3000R a �� O 2 20 A 3�p4 30R M 1 11 ICAL 20R �j o 200R V �J o 300 200 A ` 0 � PRIVATE � R, 30 300R p°0 30 30 6' WALL f 30R 0 �` 30R N ENCLVS 30R RANCHO 200R 30P mum � � � Is 7`•^' �SIDE iA PALM AS 0 Q 20 m (\ 3000 20OR - LAS 1 AS 20cn q 200R ? ¢ 2� 2� p 1 ` BLDG.2BPL BLDG.1BPR COUNTRY N 30 300 200 A M � 300R w 200R 30 6 P, o C J A 30 A u 3000P M N CLUB N N 200R Q ` ;Q *4 30R � � L^ar 190 191192 193 • 194 195196 9 I�1 30R 300 w 30R r ' 8w 200 Q V 30 0 20R w 30 v (j C7 300R a N 30 d 20 e q 200 N 20 0 r , 2wv�V/ N ,n 20 A Q mil, 30 co 3000R U 300 30 �A 200R ►��/1 (!'1, ~ _ 30R A 30R N W 30PR 0 200R M as 300R r 30R d 3 30R 000 20R a N 200 N 200R � 300 Q w ►a �•� �1 200R Q 200 p N� 20 3000 �. °° 200 20 n 30OR `N 30 I� 3000 m 30 Q Q 20R 30 3000R y `•~/ 30R 300 � �° 30R 16� N L 30R 20R Ca 300R [� 3000R 200R r M OR a 3 .� N 20 G m 3 � 30 "' 300R Q M�.y N 200 p i \_ a 3000R m 200R r� rr 3W _ e .a300 30200 A 300S 8s 200R IM OOR .a 00 - 30 'r 3000 N t r r: gn*1 ---� _ __ _ r. 30R 3000Pg 30R 26, e" 30R BLDG.5APLR 0 20R o, 30R N P. 20 p y 200 0 C. [ R 20R d 30: 20R c oo c 30 30 3000R 200 M ^ 2O Q N M M O r►JL_ l x 30P G° c,J ` 0 20 d 200R 30P 1i3 na n n6 LO) 77 .� G 30PR f 30R 30OR l� RI V L 300Ln SEIZEN 20 PHASE 2 PHASE 3 30 PHASE 4 PHASE 5 PH ASE 6 3000R Q 30OR 300 p N MM 3000P WELL SITE o r AND W S 0 CO o STORAGE 1 -49 WALL i« �.n �` P 0 LASE 1 --_=t no O° - PHASE 1 .. PHASE 4 PHASE 201 PHASES PHASE 3 PHASE 6 .,, MONTEREY COUNTRYMB SITE PLAN IDENTIFICATION KEY BUILDING AND ELEVATION► BLDG. 3APR o - NUMBER 1, PLAN NUMBER► o Qo �� $ 0--_ LOT NUMBER 0- 263 264 265 266 0 o : b -- 0 GATE HOUSE _.� ow .r CLAN CY LANE ZOR e 0 p 30R 0 �I� � 30 a ��• � 30pOP - �3000 w m a 20 e 0 300pPR 9s 300 30pR(' �. DRIVING <0 3020R O 20R a 300R 30pR d 300 A RANGE A -1 30R m R r 3000 c • � 20 A o 0 300 A 3000 t ` r .a 30 p° 30 0 30o 2QO s� 3000 ' F 3000R 30R P 200R s o 3000R 4 300R w 20R A �r? 30R N 3pOR C9 30pR 300 r I 20 a p A 3000 F� 300 cc 3000R - n w 30 �-1 � i � Z00 � g 3000 £•�, Z 30R R 30 3000R �� 1 11 ICAL , 0 R p 30R rn �.. 20 - 0 2 ". 20 c� P 3p0o - ooR ` PRIVATE calD �, 20 m 20R A 300 200 A `� f 30 O 20 m A 300R 30 �• ` V WALLS/ 0 30 30R ENCLI S N I 30R ;a r `` " 3oR SIDE YA 200R 30P s 3000R 200 RANCHO g Q M 3000 R LAS PALMAS 200 20 "' a 200R 1 BLDG.2BPL BLDG.iBPR 0 oa � � � � � M 200 N W � 200 M M o o N M COUNTRY 30 `n 300 a 200 A 200R o--J te 30 c N N M N ` a300R q 30 a 30R �� V 3000P 90 1s11sz 193 194 195196 97 \ll CLUB 30R V �° 30R N 30R0-0 3� �N 20OR 30R 8W u U 30OR 200 a . ' 2W 30 20R �. 200 20 O m 3000R V 30 F0 20 m 20 A Ld 30 oao C 20OR N �!� C7 300 30 30PR 30R d 300R 30R 30R ¢ 30pp 0 20R V M ►� 30R , ooR `' 300 N 20 a 200R0 30R 200R d 30 2 200 C] a 300R � N 30 Q w polo N l ,J ` 20 � / _ cc 200 C7 �Q 30 c° N 3000 3000 30 G �' 20R 3000R 30R • . a m ��' V cc 30R pq ~ 20OR 30R ao 300 3000R .a 3000 F.y N N p 300R T 30R 30 Z200 cc C5 F+~ cm N pa 4 300R d 300 ^ l 3 0R. ~ 3070 Z W 200 300 300R0 c0 t ca 200R 3000 300pPR N 30R 8s A 3000 r - 30R 20 ap P 0 �, BLDG.5APLR o C7 30R _ 30R ► 20 A C R r 20R �.;.a�. 30--, 20R o M N M 30 � 200 Nam►R� A C� [� � Q 200 =^ M M � I 30 c° 3000R 20 " �.� 20 im � 200R o N Q 173 17417 176 177 30P co `✓ t q 30P ••� 30PR z C o • 1 30R* CD oQ? 300R 4Ln C�T�Ei N A V r 300 j 20 PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4 PHASE 5 PHASE 6 30 `^l 3000R per., `• 300R N 300 A cc 30WP .� WELL SITE . • � � AND STORAGE 1 < WALL 1 i . 'A PHASE 1 — Q sit Q PHASE 1 o PHASE 4 3 PHASE 2 m °, PHASE 5 t E PHASE 3 PHASE 6 1 KMIREY a COUNTRYCLUB SITE PLAN IDENTIFICATION KEY BUILDING ' AND ELEVATION► BLDG. 3APR g NUMBER e� m g a Q PLAN NUMBER Ill' o o I LOT NUMBER► 263 264 265 266 9 A cp i . _ _ . - - __ _ ---- ___ . -- -__: . . --- --__ __ . . - _ ----,- _.-._--_ .------_— __-,- -, ......yy --.. \ , :, Y1: [ 1 IIIc (, € . - I j11 > ,;> t 4> 1j\ s `�I \ I T a J t - "�, i' _ - III n '' f t' '•C O O 1 7�, // 7 7r �_._-�..�.__�._.�� ------' -'- ,� t rff��(( J n . 1� \ - I 1 `} • . \ M ti ' . 0 V_ 's f,s =I; �� 1 r4T Lw V ° 'r o Ci , \ \ �7. y i A • . .�• _ rr _ I I CI 7 I �� ♦ A \ �II �� v I __ � \ ` I } f�_ - I '. O (/••/'``'4 j , b 1G7 ` ` ','•., r i� - �I .,�'' 1 .. r __. *. - �T\ _ �q•.. OC 0 , 'I,c Ji , ! . © �r '■ - - d J _ �1 11%_ _ -- �ii _ • '1 I 4 � j r� ' Y lr +ii-+ � l\11N � H � Jr� R -*-___'___I "I � ___ _ __ 1 'I" -, l �� / / I ♦ O ' '1.' .i i J `, -- �J F / : s n I .,sell ,li '/P O/ I. L \ � j/(/ • M �6 `.,. -' .� . Y Z �G� S - 1 1 200 rn.sn �I�_ i /T L \ , \ /' uu elms I II QI�1I a I1 A • t 1 •. - - , ~ �c� t - - ► r, 1 \ 1 Is 11 I \ I 1. \ Y (� , - fi �� yv \ !' rs { LJ"��, \ V� J' • �. / (� I` > w i__�I fro .r $ �I �UL' 1 r� : _ Y •' _ - • -_ ' I \f.^•.a �'...�,.Jr'T.1.. �. �^�I.�\ --_ I ^, � �/ �-. �.J I 1 r I `, /� / '�.�� _ a .I / 'I . I a i R . q , .*1 \ . - 'l`•. ' 1.�,; C ( /.` +\\ „ _�i7 1 \ ; \� \ r�lrC•O i� �C -_- I • CO3/k�t 0�/lIt y `� s„ Nha o 1 z- ` ^/Q'�. - < �' - .f.w,to ,; - t-ti• - ---_+ X -f -y r-r ♦ I i __ �`�+ , \ ' ` \ I • `" \ ` 1 ( I� • '% '• ' \ \\ ,A.i.IL♦l 0A VIfV ON . .� 'T--_--- ` , -- ,. ` ` `.. _ ll'— 1_l, ♦ •1 �.. _` \ C1CIU5 CM I' Ju oc -. Q z rMl SI 11 , `\ _ _ I r,� :. . O • ' ,� �� - .� �� 1• 1 l l6� t v - Z ^ r - \ K "��. E ,,•.,.A��c r d'rwL�:i�$ I �aw[w0 Ao-,_n��,! ��' $. I -) .7, , T //� // T T ,/ a �( �/�\ T / - - 4, , „ �-`�Ste` i`J ♦ \ II ! / / J I l V / f \ / / �• V ! � -. 4J� -- 1 _ �'� 'Y/ ^/�,• '-1 •" w o'�AV a 91TN I 'I -- " ��. V T - . _ NTM ♦ .. _ .. I t I I - A ---v� - �'._. _ �' ' \ \ I\ A - Q' `���Qv _ '1 d A'S�"ra Xo sa rr ,awta Igsa a+ l: * » ( �" - -- -� 1 / N a SONOaa I oa -�w_t a':GOLE A av �' `- • m \�b $Ah hCI VLA$ Av rr�- T _ ? i � �MMM wTI r ..T ,l l ti a 4uAoawo A {. J I J t a =� !4' . -. t-k , ' r \ ,, 1 I ' E S1fAAA vrs OR ClTaux- I ♦ [ _ - r - - -�1 �\ �' \,� j �- ✓' r -?, / /, f= TAM/t0_ (yl ----(-T -n 3 !' 1 I KI ♦ e ^ \ _ . zty `_ 1 - - /. 1 j.' / j •, -� AaNChO 4i/Ah�Ez !J1�T_-_Ta----Y-.-'��0 .,.,> > a'2 I Sµ�a V " � j J I , - {�� " J i \ _ _ \ 'fi- - r___. ..-ram_ . ` _. Lr '' -c casct r. 9+s jd I .1 �.?\ - -- , - ,` 4 iJ,•�1 Stij l /T p Y f•' o W V lC lNI � -I �, - �- - x ` �� u IR 1 G' , �� r- ; r � Sd _ A, c, ' ",. / , 1, - V s� U ' _ - d a SEC A A t g' = 1 s _- > . \ I �2 - : I - 00 OF P� SERVICES �' scAc 4 , �! I � r - � o t ;. -SEA. f ■ �C \ I M I - r r I . , " I I - ♦ x • " �= r , I ♦ �_ _ 9` + ` r ✓ '��� 4'' 1 1 i \ _J� I 11 I I � � t ��77 ' - - 1, n • n 51� — - , - ,c, _ , • I ti - • A, _ .1` I r /� � ��! �� 1> �f� � � I � - �,v cJ. � .�.� • -� i ��-��•.� � �,�� / ^•�' , _. .L �-3�v � ---�— � �- C C°e I - i- -- — - - `- �a" �- n \ ��>F .s - ' - i" _ a- •) s ` ✓+ • v 1 •r _ -` /_ , "/'` NOTE S �_ ��— a / • i ` ` I N I I - ' I� S _ r '? - - 1. - Y �- ,\. \ /��. / \�/ •` e ' - j S- Jri T - n� ' \\ -�.^f-�- -.\ \ .,. ; i / 7 n' a -.0- -7 _ �__,�_� \'�� , "'`--. :.� # �__�� I 7 i I, . , _ 2, _ - = 3 - . , _ � _jL LoT USE ` - - - - (��l . �_ RESIDENTIAL I — 17 a S �- \ / , T z _ _ - �5 '� *, - r a y J, � � �� r-��2\ . . RECREATIONAL I8 2q I ' �� - _ ;,� - '!�� - �, 1 v= ��. j ��t ��;� �� �I Q WATER WELL S I TES 25 .26 �' J - © _5 e - �-7 NA, ) Z • ' �` , h - - _ ; . _ � .� r _ �- 0, h �' BUFFER AREAS z7-33 . I p '� I - J 1 r ' \ \ 4 r -- !. • /.. 1, '1[ \ r (v�l /.P g ? A r \S �� ~ l \ °�`y ' (� ` - ._ r 'P � s � �- - 1n i �y - - I -\ `^eY �` (`� m ; N - �_\l• I \\ J� ,� _ - �3 •, I'>D - I- \/""'(1,/ " 'J y I ( '7• J( I'h�, ! r �, �:11,..j` j 1b `�,1 , LT x , /,30 ! .3.3` \,` Z. t ,-��, e © h - \ ( .� / rJ '� V •• l ` 4 •I , `J - "I ,� _ • / ,� � � •�. �` PR03ECT AREA 155 �C. 1 O i` , .< •\S \"`(I i-'.,�..�, 0 �- /� I' \ �,I , �1 1 • rr a' I ' C-1` - a \" 1 : \ t .�, 1 lvv L- _,.� J i �. !J - / cl J� � 4 ^� 'v l� •l� o o a � �/t ��_ ° • " �1 `i � -_ I __/ - ��� .v _ O ° II ,� h , �, p X UTILITIES a. i' _ V - �( �, v h V,� ` . r c �� . . 1�� ,- - �� v �° 3 -Y� - ` , + WATER COACH LL VA LEY OUN Y T v - v�,, - �, �r ��. v_ ;, , ` �� �_� �; z o I I • � I t . _ t ` A L C T WA ER D5T. / l , . _..� , I� 1`4 �� �� ��.,►,,�.{ � � � � ���•� SEWER COACNLLA VALLEY COUNTY WATER DIST �f - �r�,� - R � , ,f,l �, . �' �,�r� o, ;� �� _ � -►`' �'\ I TELEPHONE GENE�AL TELEP[WNE CO. y _ • e A {' \ w s - - _ o - a'`�� �� ��' "� s POWER SOUTIRN CALIF. CO. $ �- �' 1 `t; EDI5ON � /30, _ - 1 �, �;� i , I r',; r rv�� (� °) a s �� �, l c � ( \v , ) : GAS SOUT4RN CALIF. GAS CO. II I, n D�.�\ , .\ 1 /- I 1 l l \ �,y, ,9 v, 11 1 ^ { r r \ _ _ y / jig 0 t Y _ `-`-f ` �B -� ,� ` \� ) — - �r70 is 4 I J ,I \ ,' ._. rn s ' \ J l , y ✓ - _.�. 1 ,'�9 "/ �Q • f1, " ° �'i Z��� N I �, t�; l - • � 0 11"- ) t/ -- SE B " t >�- ` \�� i_ - t \ r' 'u\ h /�. x : , Z �, --\ o ti ^ �� a _, ` { :\1 ' J SCALE . I 4 ' PREPARED FOR I� - NR [ MPANY � t �•�S�` -_ -- \- � � - r S U ' - ��3�' -C •���� � m �n� \v � � ��J e' � �� 1 � i � r/ �� - �� (�1� �0 P.a 4 .1 �> -- ,- _ - _ ;, Nt�� n — I 42 DOO - - _ C_ , n �\ , ; - -- t -_ - i L� ! RANCHO MIRAGE CALDIF�v 270 • - ` B HO E n — - --— _ _ ,' ,� p 01 •� 1e N l . "1a\\ - -'t- � _ -, \ S J _ -_ \ 1 �__� , ) Ir , l _ ` __ p ,I -(`.. --,a6 r ._ _'L- _ \_-_ 7 , N �'\_.��. _ \ ` 0 n I\J _ /� ..i O �. 6 r V A 3 , `, FOR CONDOMINIUM URAE _ - - Q fit_ . -� 6� . I _ - r - s v I �Vt M - -_ _ _. ss a - Z8 - w� �w"� )' J� 1- F�.I \L!I J n n/tJ .5 ��� �" d f .. t -rlS 1 ,.,.„ p / \\ : Sfl,r . ` ,� ,1/ . I! �1 \ IW 1 1) . I I _N. — , _ _� _ __ a O , _ sbs- _s\ - -= 5 �55 .i 1 w� �' �I �f`,I a.3:. ?J' .14' 24 -- f �� --� - _ ,/ �,; Im, I fe4� / .� ly' / 41 2 I r, tsauvll 7' I esrs +� .. s —.�P - I f.� ► I TH C !TY OF P/-�LM ES T 31 I✓r-�cf "��,�� B \ y_ .u.s� - - _ ..v ,r 'cz, s�r[ � rrr co. rra to a rr E t"cv.P•0 R� _- __- - / CL 1 �T r �t=5 ` _ _ -.-_ = p �� �� \ �J \ /? i (>i f.i F I i (!ram>' r�IY.r 1a1'�j0: ?ot 44 i/r • . �\ c_�^ --� � ,I ° / � � BEING A PROPOSED SUBDIVISION OF A P RZtON OF THE S. I/2 OF SECTION ( . •- •" -� En 8 T. 5 5. R. G E. S.B.M. ND A PORTI I 1 \ / - 1._ I> , A ON 0 THE N. /2 OF SECT ION 11 ,T.5 5. , s5 + . x - , a � RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COU 7 Y I F R I/a I MONTEREY ROAD /20.�1 ,_ t �._, . KI �_1 1 I -_+, � - L O ` - \, \� , " 70 -- ' NaLF SEC T 10A/ W _ AL 0 � - J9. T * ,, _ .r ' !__�� 1 ,1 I x /�_ /t =.-- bb ,�� — �� �4 E/\ 5 T I N C ZD N C.'( �3 - V __---- \ 1 I / -- — T x ! x 6 `J _ - ' - 1 I./ _ - .' '�__. /JI x/3B, ./ 1 '-�- - :.� ✓ `��• ,��- - ���1' h"" .. - � QC Ot 1 1 ?t Q , _ 1f u �� �`— �_ o R-I R 3 A N D , 'I I I - ------ �--- - I I - . 1 1 1'` - ` /6J - �_._��_ ,:, - X X,3J t \'\ _ w er., • ,j , I -_ .- _ . <xl p J 1 �. - ,` - � ---- _--�--�_ �_ -;_!-�'---��'__---- -_ --� _/31 \i, J1 <,. x/s// /sot - t 1 E _ u---••,.... «_ �� � ' _ - _= _=__ - - _-- -_-_----__ — _ __ _-__ —_�__ -_ - _ !� ' J x RO POS E Z ON I N 1 � � � � t j 39r 8 ` � e � .. / - : - - � ' x _ _ ,7'r"'Cf',,.v/. ,rf/ �f "C`LYlP9 _- __ `L_ D _."- J1 �_ / �� f`0 s �1 _ \�-�_ -�. - r3J IF— / / - - I ` '-� I \ � � 0 N �L - V 000 ..:.✓.:.c r..IG.t'}!d.�- , rPrK cG. .�rl.�. rol I _ _ . _ (\ 3 p 0 D .. J' -�.\ r r9J♦ , - , t�-_= ' ��\\� -�,_�_, ,.' `� - .•Iv -� t U _S , r r/I 1 / is' i 9 -� _ - K _ ` d 1 '_ - --- D y- - � , D ' w 3 ` i - �>,f r - _ -- �_ JJ. �,, NES/A PALLS y reel, - -_ - �w -- __ - 'rO -� _ x� /ITt �__� /60 �.r , /\. I ' // !" I 1 r}! - -� ---___ - r /t _ .. � _ .15. �t• :. I - __.. fJ.9 I H/i L� S G�(�lY. - "'�" _.. cr`` 51 E ''/' 9JJ ,;- x9.. ,-~-x==-- -_ _____ _�t/ --- -_ ;l = - - �llf x,.1/ '1p --�,IO �-y�ic�� SECT/Ows �o,e 10. i21 47-� _ II ^ Ir /{ ,94 5 91S i,�/ x ,9J? c_- a"'_-- " BO ~� ` , i,. \ ��//��� /IT/ tTo -=_ -` ..__ ..\,.._:_'. `,._ I r i x /!!? �._!-- _ r 19/6 ,K �',�---'�� _ _ -- '�� _ If )A J y r,}O ■ Y x /t1 x lfL T __ -x/III__ _ tf I/-.-._ _ /'��•''� /� �7•� _ ..� 1 '-� '\ / 't_ '�"'�..-..�!91 9 L/L' _- / _`~-"'at _-' -__ _ , _ ..__. i�1l'L�• -__ - �\'_��__ _\�- C' r/1t t , 1 _�� /1J \ - ie4 i/-� \�- x'IO! , I 1 x '/ / _ �,C Q _'pry^` 11 A - X I'l_,�' I '\ f/ / \ ` c:. ._ -..-_ /._'\.. _ � ' .S �._ L ©� - x'!tB r -1 .� - tt0`��=_ rt/!OT x/.11 _�.�/Jo •ryII 1���\���J rl/Bf1� -Arl5 + r! _ - y _ ¢ - _ is —� � ti y � - - -- � 4 , z f\ - z '' � 'ri - T-. / , /sr/_-, h We /' v __ � - ---- If /70 �`�S=E ,Pose ' `_ - - NI N a ! 71 I 1 I,96 I \�,yj,i/ - H-1 1 r S. -6 I r IVt 6 . , T , -.-J - _-___ - ---_ ---.._�q/ �-- T1 ,,O x ` - /t,, Grp - -_ / b X9J ! x � / \ _ I _ \\ } ,I w !e .9, _ _ , K, -` ,.S -- '._ 1•' � �_ r � ., ,; I /.f.1� •I x� ��?�- - -- - � -_ r /9l J J 1 -. !9!r - -C� ___ ---_____ r�.--��---�� ,_ r p f • '6p _ __ _ _ ,._�, b I 1 �995 x/93..1 -- /� '.,', , ''v y, .. �"'- VQ_' / xH/P 'a[.: x �- 90! - _� x/!O • __ -,- _._ I,•J1 xlr, _ x , .f - .ST,P l 3T,, - /so 9„ r __�� • x/II i I/Z �..I { \.� 0 q 1 I �_ {/ 9J6 ,, 19ld _ , _ -- _ / __--- x r _ \ �� \ is x/SD/ _�- _ , - +__$_= VVi X / �• -r_ X ' 1 I x I w- Ix X/1!I /II - /I/J Ci(� r I 1 / J I�i/ ` !�/ ylt/ ;/9J. w�..�.. -.f_ ! .-__ Ix'- - .K f •�� y �_ • �� • t ``_ /71 -_X TI yr t. r - , < x,WI ` M1 -_._ _- xr, f n• r O _ - /7 ice-_. 1♦ j / t9 9.J `'- _ v'f• __ _ , ..., O \ y ,l01 ! \. f _ �+.. 1 /' _. _ 1 ¢n - / II / I / yy 9J \ , x x In \-. \ /� T� _• 6 / ! :-x'! X .� ytO �_`- -_) %IJ7 \ 11/ /tJ --• 1 / ,9J 6 (/ABJC ` 9 6•L, /9J 6 ,91' x ' r!O• r/f!! - - r !/N! .,��` -/N I �'-�_ /� ^^�� ,/ - ��__-_ ,Y. /60 t I ••1 /� " r,9J B '/9J 6 _._- - ;!93B K , r - ( x re!! r \i YIfTK"` `_-_^` '! / -__ - - 7 / _--_._ _---._- -_-_-_ - /- (y�� / I. 1 x. _r.�_. 1 �l I I 9d 9' '/ 9 1 I,: _ - \ �' v �. �'`:'`�.. v\ _ ' /s!!� / * -S 'N'; ! X C--- _ r�� � r - - /Ir! 11.. yr x -�, - �.. `-- - xr ='•^ A, '9 - `--- .� M� _- I /IO _ C--- - M t �_ ,Ils - r. X -� rJ0 - ... .. _ - x. �� �... AMr �- - _---_. �__ ����� _ ��� ��"--� /12 9.s Q so. !ei s _ \. -_ x ■ �'�, IJ �� �M -ems t �_ -� �� s % - +elf. .. r--_ • S - - -� I - �_�� .3 6 A; V �- i, I m / x N '!r 9 x 'P. A :",__ , ,N! / - �- \ ��rfi 1 --r. i p,N -/ _ -...� - �� ! �� _ W, '� > 9.s r 6� 9, _ �� .J a 1 _ 1 M 7 r'/y!i B - _ 1 r - - .� A� �) x x f /�/� C� L-'�' �',.Li x J n.•l / :.-�/�t f!p - __�_' __- __` . /.J _ '\ r ti // JJ �y3 r I r -i 1 CJ ^.v \ .� - l� T _ _ x t�., �a_ y Af/r x R 9 .>' - / J y _ - /, ^\a HI /�i I '� \_, _` ,w � --- ._ _:� �.. _. , -�_._ /9P 2 J .y �._ _ �- - _ ♦ r9,t \ '\ ,• r`. •, � 0 _- 1 � - S-� �,`� � �. � \ -. --�� 1,,,, / / \, /: r9! / --_._ x - - �_ / , \ x \ _f -, I. / ,� �/IT.\\ /IT/ �'J� '\�. / - /B/7 _ _ X/.TB x _� K `x \ _ .,\ �� ' �' _ - /. r �I s B}, SQ Ses a If tsti / X , / o �7 r I / \ �\ f l\\ /III /M9 / // ' 1 I I _J. :' _ , �,.-- -'-`•+_,,.. x • " 1 \ , I • • ( ./ �� \ _ x !�J \ N 1 r x l� •ti. - " -�-_ \ _\�_ `� ';,=f 1_ �� \ X \ J I ,1 I \\ // /9J B �_. Scar/ \ - - - s ,y1t7 3 •-...' \,\ - /� ,�' _ ,,`. /J/ rN!\ x �� 4 � I . '`� / i.) /f1 _ _` r \` ...` \7 _-_ -" r1/1 ti I 'r I I I�,� - 1 Xy `{I x .._._ rY•. Brute r L x ,M.JI r r \, X rJ \ �." t "._�/ \ 1 rI 1C_ �� �OT _ - `"�__ _ �- ,•66 x _� �\ y O 60 ./ ^+.__... / .' x ��v V / L f t �� _ _ /TO - -�� x/16 6 11 J v/ - �\ . Lo - , �,o l l3 ,_ ►� , - _ _ _ - 1 , (•tom ^ - r 1 - --__, ___� /) �: �� _ ' ,.J� \• /,' W /' !916 _. x _ X �...'�f7 ry `� ' .119i 'J -J �'� ,' `� _Ir '!I �,r /oft 0� �b •/N, _ - ____ �/s J n _ _ _ \ --_� �J - ,[ x /V _ , - .i \ I`I J , '�. K ,..'.' XfI / - _tB_1 ..�, , C _ �. C`�.��_ x/.!J r c�� Y _ , . / f t. i .I 7� I K - t \/ /eJ q - - r - fa -` • .69 / I 1� , ,�g-�� y r 9 9 .- J /A i '�-% i' \I I I X ,v '- , wrest �.e t_Z- _ s 36K t �1 `` _ `' '.� ,9/ X i ! x - x 9 . -,Nt . , ! �\ • r!d/9� X 35/ ST _ ____ / ! _ �_.. ��`_ pyy - - I. • / /. ,f"-�. x. / _ - �-lotr - - _ Ne 1 r r I/I13 _----" i ` /10 ® XI G..� �I �_ • / J�E _ _ ��-- Xt.2! \ ( - w _ - x v / / q, ' / ! "9J I r/9!! - i !90 Q . ,f rN1 •B9 6 ,90!v /N l /X \ ��J"a9 9 C ✓--'•• \ ' J6� ` O /'�� ✓ rr • -_-- _ _ �t0 (-�'_� x/1!6 (. x,96 k - r9J! . �T_ -' ,-- r - \, - . r I i ��"� +� \ ` I�! '_. - O \ - r /f �` �- - s ` x r116 \ �. ,It! ` !/ (�1 ,� _----. x - -_. •� 9,A x ,"1 V / ( r t _ - --D •S' J J , \ l �- 1 { r �.: x N f 9 .cam. / /T / t � ;. , � , .- x,y2P /9, .._.�.: .._ �. �, .. l t� _ ^ \.� � `. x `f7 ,yr 4 •���� / _ d' � _ \ I !..:�_. 9 . - . b\ ..,:. . !9Jl`. ri 9,. - - 1 .` ' ^ d7 ~� ' y i �' -� , � /'\i - X 9 D f - - o Pelts � I � I6 -1,. >• I - . �_ r - 9I I r r9J J\ iT 7 ," rN -,J,�j !r 1 `t a \-.N Nar V \_,.- I 1j 'J f - - I - �/� _ _ 7P __ _ __ ,71 \ __\.\ (\/I t i - r9J, L ..._.. �_ l r - � I "v rl l \ \" x/ .� �- G' i - �" �. J6 j F i x ,11 // c- _ / �-� , '. - , y 1, /!/I 1 _ t _ \ (�\ �f?•. / •. / I S 3 �•. 2 .S- -x/I _ r y Cam/ /- II ! ,x ,9l91:' _- ..% /; - %�\ \ r Ir 1 ^.. l X \ • !r !IS/� xr� G..a I �O/ Q �_ to _ !H r ----- _ �� �`` •I� , t , K \ -�. - , _-� - - ,' ^1 'Sl• \ / �� 'N' \' L -�� / SNrr tI of V x!e. ■,L 6 / .. - _ �� `. _�-�_ - _.. - - CITY Vr �., '! \ I ...� 9P, - • --` I" � r ` F�� i i f I x - _ •� .?•x PALM - � - r - ` '- 6 "� Z y. , x -. 909 fI9l. • i~ \ ✓ / N! I r !/ - x �- _ �` ` _� OES RT / �, ': N , 'I `.,., ` 993 x 9 ' ` . i �9J 6 19I r \ �\ ■ .f, " \ ' ♦ I /IJ! xre!r I . _- c- �. 90 3 _ to -'��-, ! ! K If/ 'B!� r �! T �. I I -�- 1 r J 2 oT. -_ 9?J . � / 1 - ' _ - _-- - 'sce , '!o -� -�� Y ?�R 1 �NT • - ,, _ r III _ _ \ ' I .97, l I / .,!!9 - x x I x V - _ v'�-� ,� ,I71 IN i�� �XIVI ,'_"� r rI11 / I 1 ,''; - _ _ •'er Iru+6 , _ _ �..� �r Q M x /� _ _ •< { 'AJ! __.�_ �.. rK! r - l X/I!! J ; _.._. "'S' - � ;_�_ - JJ .16 O ,\B - -- V 4 !9T 3 Jl31 ,1. x _'r7Bx r "mot' x ! ,7l _.7`7s',C�` ^�.- _ x/dJ ( i �"` �� O/ r/.!, - 7 fI!!_, -�= - _ �� "``_..__� \ \. _ \ / - _ ' w gg 1 ;. ,. " i J x _. �,,.(i H/9 \.. -_. ---• .. �` ;90 �_ 1 !N/l, \► , �, X x/ff ./ � 7! __'^'.,.,..,ems+.., x � x/f!6 / _ - -__ /6 � - �1♦0 VVV I _ K=c'82, / Y x s9 _\ - — ► f!a \� _ ° „ e� f2s~ t - \� * �� _ -��_= \ - E $ 1 .O 9e9 ,.\ "io . !-_r, _ X,. i r I9 9 _ 7&5 K _ �_._ O r i' � - � � Y \ � .. ._ / `- X `._ "� 6.�IV�� W � (Cf�� /- e, r "' x -. !,J - `. a ■,off! 6�a _ x/I!J - /II! - -� - --,� - _ - - 1 r . 'r91f 9 r9r1 - -- _,. , " ', l MI rf ! . -. ' �K ! _ K reT .I! , _ _ _ 10 - - — _ `� �r1i7I r9.r` r, (�0 -... • ` 'I " 5 i[ BI l r K'� '4IJ 6 � /� I w �'�- / -__„ p� / '1 t x ;92♦... r •�' -\ x�! ,.�"� NJ 7�. 1 \ �rll/ �!� \� I!} !fat �• .1 -^�_- 7 - i \ Ji�"i _ - '1- --_�� Wt • _ NO V `t u,,l91I �( r �r9B7 � � /91 -.. \. .\ _. '� � 1 � � I � � C' /I!,r -. '-�� `-�� `-- _ ♦ x O " i'�1 x 0 r _- �• 6... ._ - / - x / 1 _ 'eJ J� I /l �� K , \ _ �\ --1�. �...r��sr , l� � K { .-- '9!! '.a . r - J W ---- /Ksx �._ '"\ ..i '�iT ,/J I`_ x - F^ / + x JI!/ - . -!I I _ `� o t ' r .... x - '_, 9..,,,' r9l . _ / \_ _. Ir ,_ BJ 9 r X 1BS 3 '','olds /. \ . _ ^__` �.. c� K'''r\ '4 ', _ _ gg -- C,�, {� - I ,} I ,93. I ` t x96? \ \ 96J - xt F 9lr, -- r,90�- { �..- Bli I r _�, \ ,N, - V / \ , �' �"" X/IJt✓ < '\ ') '�9 . . \ _ f= "/fd! -�. ASS I�.�..M,�� _._, I x V/ - - x V -� -n Nf �` /I!}- '` I i _ i _ '^'+-. \ >..,�. _ _ �_ ._ - , ! 7 x ,91 r _. . - - "._ - \ 10 \ r - / •. -/r i' I �. r 1,05 3 K �� __ \\ .it"4 _�- :_'^+..,,_ _ _ , _._ / f K, . A•c1� • I tIJ J I -� ' 1-. .l - tf.. +,ram �.- - )D-_ J,1 O x \rI� 1 d- _ _ ^-c,7 x ,t , ` - 9s ,9,r 1' ' c----.- - L!r s \� ,els 'I6 J '� t f -� \ i .. /I!/ �._. `) K - K, ��` .+o qi z \ 11 r� ! tJr� _r9r6 .S/C•0 r%J " x 1 . . If; 9r 1... err\ • 1\ .97. ' j r r r' ��, \ _ I'..,,.. 1 ( !/! t r, �,, K,B.J I', - - �_ ,Bl. 8� � % r� • XtI/6 , a W ` ,9 - ,93 " .7 Yt99 t !9T 3 ;.9■3 r x `� - t �s/- I© .,' -_ -✓ x r,! x` \ x/I'6 _ �•7 - '__ _ t0 w t 1 -.� \ r 79e 6` _ x ,,,i_I.. 90! I �� � Lam__, " t / N i \ x \1 / ♦r ,F v -- 1 ., x �\lilt/ ,B1! ` , -:•k_ ' x x V9 7 I J �Il h X e!, x rsJ -x 1 I ti 0 /9J., I O I x O r S < ",d„ _4 S Q � t _ j 0 B!/ _ d! I , t 1 I r _ , _.. :� l '. l d6 l-_-_` \ '";. .-/ = r,Il! X , / \ ''' __-. - B?Ix. - --� '�' - /7 �E� 1 CY. ! \ �J _ _ --, " \ - o x 105 ! SI / - I / xrel f ? �----_ fl0 1 1 - / r ,9J9 9 6 !p11 - r < � dr,�'. \ 1 MI. 'f" __ O/( `- O , ... '936 -. '19.I r r ` _ x ,9 _ -_-1 'I7 r. - j,! .� /f/f i _-` ./ 1 \ \ x xr8.J \ - __ ' /Bl - -_ -/I , 1 �✓ x/I K/7 rI 1, , x x - x I ! ,I9 i r'1 I J/ !'.` - r �� O I _-i.�: -__ 1 9 I ! 9.9 - - ,,lam x :I, I \ - r9?3 - `-� x x J _ _ --� 'Nf - '�"_. / C-- 1 Av ' ) -_ y. x /r/Id -. -J \\ `�, /I/. Sren..N Brar. /II 1 •\ • _ ---- , '(t / , /� r� , _ 9 x T91• x'AP! rA'♦,... if,Jx - i I '' A ! �� Zl �. ----� /IJ. �---��� / t - > rdrJ X r x _ - / N ! t Q , ' \ . r - yam, .. 2 i r ✓ I x/ ,IJ 7 r x , x I / Q \ \, { 0 I' / S Z7' ,96, 6 0 .Y- - 6 '•7,F'-- N! O B S J Y+. / y 7 s/J__ \ 1 , - .... I I i � h p �, r L9 �.*� `� i .X x_ - P _.% ,`�. - �\a'. \ !I f f / I, r, '`; S, VIl 6 .s ""+, 5 ' '\ /ei 6 ^�/ _ I/9 _ tf' ` "� BO J I „r .; I , ` - '7 f iE ` ,92, _. i , - X" .<'<:' i ,9 / v• R191 ,Y rS - IJT/ tJ 1 \ IJ �/' - r/ - If/" / .- I - ( ff/` \ '.•.,,� 1 - _ x . _ r ._ -�I /I7! _ ! �" x/ l! x �♦ '1 /'�fR13 �_./ 'd i. !t t \ .�_'\ /1\ _ ,'� _ \ .S' 9J J`" M6t ,. .:.__ 9/2_. - _ °- \ air O rd7� " i '\ I tfJ/ ^�. \ ,f3 9 \ I rG. <: 4. �. x/It3 , "1 �/ , O /1 _- - 195 ✓ ,'.� M x ,,, .. d r,. _ ,\'�• - f,lJ, - _.._.. , ! ,/f} --...� - rf 1�J I - K, "0 '\ , .X /.� I _ '� 'A,*J�' , // V !A!„ y X IY �'I a0 '\ F'. x - t. _ - , r C�•1 t. • , -�I x/f71 \�- r r rB1) x!f16 _ \ --_ '1 `�\ \! rd, ,•Y /r _ -!B�/ \S ( t Lh �( r . ' , y ,,,.', �• xr91! -x _.._ 9 -., • - - .-_ r fK l.� 4Kt 1 C \�-1 'BJ7 r \ ' �l !d!I �• _ XfI! •\x'`'I2r _ >611 .�' \,\ 1 r ,�/ (- `- \1 6 '%>Q [ - r ._ . It 22Q' 9T1 '" r _ , x.._ xtllr - }`. .. - C�1' \ - /� / , �_ ` , \L-�� 'f.3 .1 -' X. - 1 - _ , ._a I - K!e } I79/ I 33 x �c 9v ess „Ire , O x - x R ,I10 F - tf _ 1 1 r9J 9 1 ..>' - / - �. :, - :93 w se`_,: -- " - Hr / Y - � x _ rAI. i ,K \\ \ !fs s -- rB.S (('�� l , - _ r \,. e11 K -"-^�. �BO I t ' , / r ', -',. `.� 1 ,9T 3 ZOr2 �. x t! 3 .-} X lv \� ( -- Qlrf61 / - !II.� 1 ' IB/ /' 1 , �. ,L h x r - _ �. 'f19- - - x /17D• /f7IT}\\ • \ K !; ( Y { \ x rlf. AIJ_ "v: !6 ( / 'y{�_. 1 I1 / t - J i - -. x !9?6 3.<. x �-_•' -. , \-' i' d ` i ," ' X/I1. --- -- --\� _ �'1 "a 1 it ..IF /l. '� _/ Isl - _ , - , ..• � r ., rf0. X ,I77 �1 \ , r X/I71 rJ I r ( _/ '-�� t x ��---- X1f,.3 - - - _ - 'x!I!J �___� - ____ .. � ?._ 1 / �► ' -,yJ. , ,I I, 9�6 'ems. '._7 \,- . ?.._..- }O / X N7,I �J , ✓ 3' , K!B6f /B!J x, - _ IJ f,s t R T r,B2, , � / ti N � ✓093 � ; ! , 7 9l 1 !q?�' - _ dI f v \�., \ 6fx I �O ,^, .�{ ., Cowe 1 ,� ,e-. fP3 '� �J _�^ / \ ' -- ■ x -, - �9t - r,}6 / ■ M r x / .3- �--- /\ '.`$ _ "/IIJ x ,er_ _ _._� ( I /I// 1 130 - . ; '97T r „ \. V�,\ PIE/ ,/71 _ x 1 , - , - - �.. x/f,; //�\ (A\ .,976 - r x 9r _ x 4 '9i � N Off- � l l �' - 1 /BI J !K/ \ x x re11 x,BJ 3 ��c-A _A r \.. _ 1 �9 / ",9 Q _ V• i ,Y� Bd r / :fI, Xtflr r �/� _ � /f31 ,� ��l r7 II I M 'x 1 l� tom(-1 . ' u erxt .t1 y,'f _._ ely x�: x - ,i7! �af s� �\ x //1 ®� xts. \ \ O X'4 r r O / t" r916 �} - r- _ `IL V :99 3 a '93 1 --r--- ! %0 anne v- a�-_•�_ - �_ _ \x. _ C C , NO 4 ,05 6 / !I6 1 J� , ! //J 1 __ l:. `. 'iB 9 I I I� 1 „ -` f ,' `. O,.. x i951 . - -• ''Y 'ao/e0 _'___-�- Q} < _. _ �y0 r r ,�/ (� !N/��. X I/7 K .�.-_ O/ ®1!6 0 7 J x/I71 \ ,\ 1 , x d 9 x,I!9 x!BJ 6 r G.../ ' x/ / 'x' •�•I , N V — _ 93 !'� \� x ,%9 � /s?f " \x r•Po+MM,� � � - �._ / uMrMoaw/ yebM � "� � 17 f \., �- \ >?I I J r/IS9 !BJ, r,I!t 'I, f! rr 'rB02- /1\/ � w - - -- _ _ J , - 1 f' _ .-. ---' ;11 : 1. r9T6 O N. 61 rR76 ... x x .iAi1 `..-) ,At, - .I / _ �.. 0 --I---/ _._- --�-- --� — - - T e,wl heJrw .._ PBS_/e.9 \ `B x f /' �1 X -- -..-. x r/: � i,1 � ( V v ,v ,f71 r x " {yam r _� r "1 '� , . ,. ,.v x,91/ 1 " "1 /y69 r9J J -A" A? .. ._- _-A ,811 _ I __-_ _ /I7/ —_ _- v A I /B07 / l x 1 ! x y! X' KI ' Pt r/9..,' f/ 1 �, d,J x B x - % t ' , ,9!5 , �f,' �_ r91♦ �� X. I/91! illt.lj. v - • ,� !a / T, /f!/� ,� x EK I!r /I76 1 f / - - ,' / r I i I /91, r / : ,, � \v �• - '9d 1 ' / i901 �' / --'/d r I'_ ... ff! x �► ,l6 J�- 11 I '!i I :� x I .5 I x,-,.y.. ` x x x r ` _ _ .-.X, ) ,06 J \ � tretfl ,1,B- �82 AA 3 tWy 1 e 1 . �� O \ -. y.,/a 91 1•bl. ,1 / -_ - �� x I x/NI � / ', . 1'`1: / x/e,7 �- ' ►L �. "19J/ j x 1 x>96 9 r..^ 'I Ir -\ . ',y .V %J 3 N � !9M/ _ �..'., \\ W �\� \-__� ; Il f /-'J ..+ !B!9 lrg x rI1 9. 1 ' 1 ,/ -7 1't./ _-- ..-_-- I' `\ r .'1'1 \ / I .. \\\ I . Q ,` q55 ' ; I -- r9.If ' !. } �L i' i ,N f _ f!s _ S` �.. X, 3. t , i ; -,-` x x!a x O- -- -r-11•�- 7 I\ - 1 , 'a !f _- 0 9r t \ i - . \ r9P 6,{ \\ "I '� N N�, " r//! , p x 1 I 1 _ X / \\ -., ___._ �J I _.-/ , , ,t r l '1_ \`\ - 5 \ T _ oo•. x x x, •.'0- 'J K I S _- 'j ///f! x J X/ T�LQ '+""' _"`.0` '-�__._f__ '71 / I, 1 \ ;� ._ _iJ• y. _ 'l 'e l 1 x:/B1 t ^•1 �— _ — /� _ 9 Cll ._ 9T I x -� 'f .�. � x E T O. I r A G 1 y r99, y rRi J "!9J r93 "lx x .�. / , I v` '!B!B / / xfB67 0'35�n n �0 I ' a ,8.. ";:;`. r `` X • i'r. 7.%t ,IO. /f�J ■ IL9 7 I I\ w,. In , , .'.` I - �' -_ - ; �� .✓9. . 1 ` O x " � � , , K„76 ,/3! LOT Fr , - •- r " . ' rB t ,,t'/ K �--•'x J r! \ ' ` K x _-� / x,d/I _ / '�� f/ IB,3 ' �• /' 'O ,9r " �Q 9J hf. r ! / O - } / ` �'�- / 3 x/I11 / / ! 'NI 'tee o +1 t��. , :/9B5 I 1 ! 91 r I V / r, /7 _- , ,!6 , f �. V I - x ! r `I" ,A79 r `\ -✓, X ,! `'..� x( j �x r/71 K f ! 7rets ' III /BJ /, _, //f/I r a� - , r . I 1 -� ,I /A? ,./lI' d !936 x 9 ,90. �� r i ,066 Z7Q f \ I ' '� ,4\,f! 9 #, \, I -- ,-,.�1 - r \/J i 0 r �\ i p 9 ` rl P I K I _ k56 x ./ 6 _ 1 :/eT,. i,K 1 !S= 1,' - �r _ _ rd .. �• /99 9 r. �`i \� 7. _ /97 9 x O 96 6 - i' -� 1 - 'N. ' x /, I r _ - ��'; x/e!9 oY �r.,�_._, '// �!'-'' - / r/r/ A. K'fO l `V X L 1\ a Yg171 I ; i9J 95. x Af67 _ ! '•�� r9P .- 1 N - 1 c. -. �'_ x,d61 �Q t x � y�c ,Il7 x, J. -1_ II I r J. 0 ,,-1...I 6I I 1 '/ 7 x / - --.. �9x• ,. ,.,pp`3. ' !i �/� / ,y t M = /I71 `\ 'ie1! O.0 d ",/B19- x !BJ/ r�' II 11 -1� r , w." / x/T9! Ixli G V \ �\ r / / ✓ f,l � �_ x I v,, / ao. / I - O ♦ O X x oA ?'7 Isr r LOT ! O esr �!✓ 1 �G�� Q� - 3a \x ! f z / 2 .! r f 1 I "/L, \,� i93 �J - \ v , t .__ !d97 -x K x/tl! x/d� r l , h xIrB,9' 1� - S', PPP II ` V_ ! "� 9P91 ,97 vl , 9'6' - - 193/ ,, {.t�_ Fir f!t :�lr•:c 1 x I / _1-__ \ / , x x •-`..- R 'JI,l x!I/i'\ I IBU \'\ \ r r ♦ OL , '! / III, l B2 �k l \ r _ �.� _ , .. - x /I7/ ! x Ii s x `\ 1 �� K - /B3 - - I '•�� / "!e '\1 { x 1 \ V " ` \9h ,9F1 - r� 1 !y / - 2�5�' 95 + _ 1 _ -�f\- /IJ'1 K /KI /B61 - I ' rB1 3 __-- _ y v (\`l 1 �f -, :. / - { : ' _ 1 1 Cry / ` �. { �k _ / j x, l "'- -. = 3 llJ / , t �i�,rf _ / ,.K !BO 1 �'__\ x `I / 1'� f; � t9�/ 16' : \. r .i x -Y�I _- �.._.. __ r,L fI f 1 i '- I -"_� `,_ _ '\ •'-'-W x'_LA_1 '1.:.,T I-,�--xI ...,_G_-------__ x x V� �_ __ _ I 7- l /I// li 0 Q . i1. -9 --,19J9 '9r6 , " l� ,g,I - _� ,:.':. .-�.\ 1 ,!03 E/ N !, yn�� .(r� i xiBY Q !I ( I 5 - ---- ____---- --6•/B2 l.-.- 1829 t,. t.. Q 1 I ��+,tr o .t i� , X x - _4_ t p^�... /9./I x - f-� / --� s �� \ ' I Iv:•.;.{ -- _ I /f09r' W Krfil ,e/ �\ \ �' ,� - - f� !09 may. /\� /} 1 �� i - ! 0 I I ! _ __ -- �.. _ _ 1 x/I/6 xr'i7 11� ,' \ r II �. i! - �Of 'II /9/ I -� _J, it _ �! r N! _._J II11' /6 /B73 ` -� I 1 •. " x i - " ? ,9 L Q 3-5 .. res. I!I _ I I b '1•\. r,e., - �. -- I x t , /I I' .- _ ` I v e 7- o _ \ 1 ^ /'., // ! ! `fLLI _1I}_.t K/ •� ,',5c ,rtr r/ Brute ,:r \.\, ._.. 1931 ��" l 2 Q/ t J�I ._ x (I!11 1 8//,/ /OTI / 1 `- 1 ) \..\- _ x I ' / K �- x \ \ I r1 1( �+-_ l ,� TOO 9 ,.. DOr ,f / �' ?80•t I _. -; _ _- _.------ f t /';, \� .� /f0, , 777 A . A/ - Iel, / l j ,! I 3, r _- _ _- X x i' ,l . r •T 0 < O r,K I K/f6 , i - j /d!3 `�b6/B! �/ - r,/ ,III Q '1p1 !{�` I i- `, """II1 -/96 6 - - \\ .'b 1 \\ �• �� \ ,i " x 1 ,91 3 ' x I I -� ! , �.� 1 I Il ' ,6.J I \,l� ,_ i I ��,.� /' C1 1 1 x/e/9 ,�-r- Q1 �--- � 130 � ` I t \ 1� \✓ r. 115 --' x 9 I '1r \1 \ I\ �,� 11% it \ (} i I . i ' f J , Ai , /// (� fl I ,-Q l 1 ti e !� I 1 �J� x/fr9 to , J , !x !/I �'N� J/ � ' ~I 1 LO� ,less I �I ' 1 i r� Y, /r l .may LV /V I �\ / CIQ+ f� 11 + " f i '9J f tl , I 1 _ , • .HI „'9I1 ��, I w ,IIf , -�/ 'Is1r I If/ Nn, �_J d!9 •,I!! ,.E/I!/ 'I '11 ' 4 I •r 1 1 I / 1 :�_ /!r / r +�,1 I -J \�/' x . !Il! ' I s i' ,'ifs• ' 1 xtflf Ir ./Bll W I !elt I '( I ! / , :,I'r t \ \� . r \ I ' '� `1 1 I .f11 \ • f ic \ 3 I d x :I' 1 �' �_� ■ H/6 , ! ♦.y,! ` ,/■ 'i i-- _ - ts1 f• I ..r I I 1 1 •'f0 I 0 ■ 1 r I' x, \ L 1 r NO J I'1 ' k I • I �f 1 �910 ,ll6• ,1J4 "14.- A i *. � � I d • % N! I /NI ` ~ .�� /N14,, xrl/1 i - f/s ./I/I � I,f7 ;{ :II11 �'� ,1 ,{ ''II! ,Sr%r/l/ • ,,/! I , ! ' �!IO, c _ ! - Q/� ' V 1 ( te,fatl Irr1 /` I a!!k w I � 1 1 I `\ ' /Jl fx 9O { ,I , j i I .I .,ll.f �, K 1 •, \ , \\ If/ I�- �f)/ l x \���' ' `., 1 I ' \ Y , -J reat , ?,,J! � ,I!/ \ 1 /Yt'u+e,��,/cow I r/ / �\. �+ r r/II/ ,' / N 1A I� I I j -� 1 , I�:I, . ,r, f ) / ,ram ""R'fO/ 1 �/�\A l t , I V�� _------ , / I \ ■ x ,f 1/ A / !d-I•'. �. 7 'r - ' _ �r l Y / K Jlf ,r J _f. • %. J ' \ a 2 1.� ✓W I \ I a/ �� / A 1 1 �• _ r ( ` ' I�/I I! .-� 'I ■ �,J Jf , . „ ./� • 1 1, �'* � �_� •- _/ A A' / �'- v v K1� 't'r i, /N7r J , 1`' r '■ ✓!Jr 1)/ �N f/ , r 1 \'' \ � - %f , ,I/I, ` \ ~II�,^,..__..._. ■ \ \ ', ` r■ .lO,I 1 I ( x• I `I ' ,�7 _ l ', I �� / \` -t \ �� _•.•� I K \ `' / - N!6 K,/ .1 x ,JSL \ K JIJ! 11 / a Z \ T I^ I \I ', t 1 .� r ■ I ,1 Z.O ZZ . 1 / ' .1 \.-. /N, _ /III a Id 4 1 1 I/IJ/ I, v/O I 1 O I L / 1f'. 7 . / ■ 1 y Q•1ff ✓ f \ j I11 ` 11 . I ,1' J '. A ,1 •� .,,. -.4.�' !.A/IJ/ xrlf, , w (xtlbe 1 1 1 11 / 1 1 ■ 0 . \ / , \ I ■ r ■ !I .. !/ • ; , rl."\� i t C r,N! r r 1 � 1 l x rp7 J K/If/ I r 1 I I , �_ II x/I/T , r/f0! r fI ' r. I ,. ,,,,._. 1 ;-., ,l0 1 .!� r I 1 / I 1 I 11 I "�T. \' '.. ' 1 4` 1 k I ' .1 , .'� i. ,-10 A� !.,.. / 'y 1 ,� ,MI\ , ,11 t ' /'I �>\ /!0! ■ �,-'-� / •� L' _ _, ■ I x,/i I _ / f I 1 I 1 �r ..K,/JI I J!! O / _ �� r ♦ x r L -•1 ■ 1 ,r I JJl / / ., fp I I scAlt IfV ,' Cis / - _. . - "'.`` \_�.._� � \ ( O 0 O 1 _ `') ♦._.. - _ , �• 1 , ■ - /f!f , /. a '; r _ � � �''f/I I 1 1 I K \ I ,Iu I rI1I ,"J�� frlM}OUM IM Ti MV♦► 1' I ` �._ 1 _ _ .._ r.. w ..-•r// f 'f' 'CI f: , ' +' 7 1 \ ` 1 I , r tf/ J �`'-'�, 1 / �` Z r /Il, 'sf 1" . _ I .- _ - 4 ; ' 11 `^� • ` _ ■ r =1 . i,ll, �. j / xrll I ■,BI! r 'f I -) j__,•., . ��.'.... "/III I r 9 �� ,I riL, r }__} T�'if917' r / `710/ ■YO I -l ,J/! u ' ' / `: / ' ' ��r r/N! r r1!! I /I!r ; '1 ; ,4:�_ ... . ,X- .....:.._ ....K.. .,.._.. lC .� -`. ....� 1 -.... .•///, �� ,� 11 7 _ ■ r , IJ'�1 l t b ■ 60 - - 1 I ,N J / •�. -,..� ■ /� r/M r �._ �"'`.�_..--✓" /yam 1 I, • � �� `t ` 1 �� _ \1 4 , ■ , 1' -. fff / I _ _-�,._ S VV _-_- J l --- I/ ` •� / - n , J - „p! w CPI , --. / ..._-. _,._ _..- ( rl '■ I 4 ,. "��' + I I !■. , , 1Y �7�0�) t -�1,!' N .■ �� 0,4 r '� ■ ,,, ./- ... , x `"_ �C14E` -1 /IJ! I n , ; ; x/f..,, -745 �\ 1 \`-.._ j/I'f 1 7 SO- ", , /! _' \■,u J I"v l•P r /f! r x .,•. :Z } ^ - r• f I f7I `-_ /II, r r I I I -__ __- ,,,! "_. .rI `, /fO l r / r•. -p ,!0 r 1I `' I -\_ �• �-' 'T'i1• ) �� // ( "� , 1 I ` �� (�O 1 ✓• j y I \ • 'hJ , `t �ti- '`• _ -��• LO rN _ ) I , 1 1 ''� i � I \\�I •/ I v ,' '' _V , ■ JJI pf „O!1 rill • t J �� ■ J I �_ x,JJI I 1 , il■ ,J1 x 1 I? 1 ./IO! 1 I 1 1 I , ■!,/ ,w /-/{� (y�� �C! ■ Mlf!■ iOr j r \ �/ 0/ .-// f1e1 \ r I I Ill r IJr ,,III xrJ11 w!flI / ' \ ��� 1 Y I , - 1 ") , ` /3 _, I ,w 0 r' r r T rI3I p , 1 r/ 1 1 �7 0 �' \ / O • Dr �Z'% 1 I\, �\`, :IfJ ■ J �` NI /I/1 O / � _ /� \' ' 1 II! _ '--_--- _, - \ LaT // -� yo, X/ K I T f0 \1 ' -ya 1 ,,, , ., .. / I ,III lrfrrtrel �\ ■Its/ I , . _ 1. - - - - ( 'EI \ _a ,r C'♦ T '_". •.,,.,,1 ■ I W � ! �rJ1D 1 • �. "•A - J'r.f / r ,N/ \ tll, / '�'� _ ,_ ... I � t, k 1 hr OO \ 01 1/ /sI11 { LJ • ■ -11 (' I �,/," ■t/1I r - - , \ r , r ra 1 7u ti '� ,:y ■ ■ �, - I � \t ' _1/ ,If •'�. ,I/e(q I J --•\ � � r l I A��,,. , d �H - ,✓' it __ •,.._ .0'... ,r.e. . ....-.•� ■ \ " ,10. ■ x / �. •--[�. rKJ ♦ / / ■ �..-, r /III !!l1 I 1 / - i" r if,3 � ' r .. /� g t• I ( ice/ ;L.OT v - 17/-", , . 0 ,1 J^ `-., _— 110/f ,,,1 __ ■ 90�S ./' ..--4t� IQa 4� j,�v + .--._ice _ V / r r /' 11/GI! 'S1 I r.. 270 Rw• �S6•S� 70, , rNJ/ `.� �,OQ. �7 \ x,I„ 1 !t01 ,I01 \ I 1 1� `�i f ^•+ III / - ^ .."-`.� N 4¢ Q �• If! \ 3 / _ ± Ge \ r �S ,_ _ ,fff 71" /'ftI t�9 1. it ,!,! ■ It j1 �Ol ram•.._. ...._►r ,- �i / / / • ..___--�`. \ / _ _ - f/ rr x,Il - - - -.t'�.- ._.._ I I - - X//!I w/__ - x/IJ,_ Ir ,// t _.... t �, (-.�T \\ \ r +de sTREeT e �\_ LOJ' ( �_, 7 so -� ' 1K - \__. _ 3 �r0o 0, 1J! _�^j ., rr1� //OJ �1 •,w, w Jos!,.. _•.-....._ _. 4'33•SG._ rIZE�T LOT !� f '' R• '-�33, '',' LOT e' l.r. _- _ _ N -r-- -- - r . -A __ _- Off f 270' l45 �' S ! ' ' ' ' LOT = 5� 727 E 3 - _ x � ,I'I■ •l,I! ■ ` a � � ■117! _ _ - III - _ _/.�._._. _ ,IlJ I , . -_. - �]� i r _. ,.,. -. :. ��,----`._ 1 KIJf SlO , / /f K :Nf KNIT ,IIf r,1J! x '- r,II �1 S _ �, �"-_ 1 `:'• ram^'- . ._ __ -`"�.. C h - ' •/f!/ +!f/I / •�I/', r J .- _ i r y r /I,! /1 r '1 .. , -- 'III. , K1' / VO 7 .I r.J \ aa.... ..... _ _ r., C►..; _ ` ■r-T, 7 ,w"-" ..-�.+^ +t"'M - . . A �/ r I ..-.. _ �..... 1 ter+. _ rI/t,. 5 _ 1 1 , / 1 _ 1 L E N / ._ Y , 2 :_ •�� .'. - _ - -" _s.�', �z,1 _�..•..-"_"�-ti"'�, rN rJ I 1 / !I1 I r/f r//!T - f,/ .•-"r _' .- 1 I •1- .y.:r_. .,t... ..i -...-_^".,itii....-•.--+ ..-ter x ' V - IVF7 -- ♦ ,w Y1.( - ri s 'r .v'i w i.�. f,l��y■� i ' y y r..r rs S -• _ It J -r , . !! V V r x, t r'` 'r , ,fJ ' >,� __ J - --�........_ x ,lt� �• !I :/17j - •-!� - -�iw■s..�w/N f.... L _ __ .��' 3.- !cr`'Y *N_I I L --� �+!'^^'...r - _ �- I / tt,l _ - - " _ �!^eR'- ...�' _ .. 1,,Lf1 �-^"- ,� �I ! '..�;. `1 1 \ . ...;�I r-.. . lj ,r. -- -'....._.. (� .. ..��— »_ ,.._:� rI„ 1 1 ` ! _ --_ ./^, 1 / t 1\. Ill J . ,• rr 'i 1 1 V I • -• , " � .... r }'` .■ 1 v \ ,'s,.:/ .. - .i�l `J B// r� •- r,!!J yr.'.'.. - �I%ar r ,""`�.. --J 1 I G ?i . ,NI ,fl f ....•A• r ,9t " ■ N w r' r-_.. % 1 ■ `�. tf71 �.j`•,;_ IJO r�, ,/ �� \ fIl J. I .a•." J! _. .. ',III _ 1 .. I. * .. ♦ t• ■ r • r �. • ... _ ,.n • e e • \, _ ♦ _r ♦ t >r \. C`. q (� �, ^ n .r ,.J J r0 ,+.+.J rM\ `1, • .Nf ,,Ill ! \ \ /� I /rN ••\ 1 rrt _ .I !J ' 'x 1. , • .. r {_ 1 _ 3. i ■ ,J/, r.' .N 1 L '• \ , ,!-�...� \ `./II / l /f f " `� 1 I , • 1 T+ r G ., Y`r 1 'i' -- '."`I - Jl - _ , ■ U -` .a._ /r `l ' ` .: ■ ,,,•'...-./ '. "�- - , . , , . -.i ,f3, / , , -�� r, - ,� E 1 _ ■ '1 N I V\ Y y1 Y► V , YJ , Y- - ._ .�.. ._.._ ,. .. -- ....,rr„��,r. y.... �..-<,- r.. ._..._.-.-. ...__.._ ... ... a. _ .t•._. , � .--ate=. f J y�`�,..... _ /JT/_ - -._, x,IMM�I r _?� -s'�.- ,/ 0 J `, ..r: / ,r..,A: /r y O J �` ,\ - - a P R i PA R ED F � 1 - ..r I -- . [� Su N M - r tIl J till ■ 1 1 �'I -� ,._,,,; Y`'`� r �~ �-'"r/ r i 1: oR s E c aMPANY i _— C 0L L E E — — -- , _ . ,N:} 1 r/f;; -Y- - _ _._ _ _ r 'a--,- -- r r, p.r . - _ _ G 0 F T E DESERT _._ _ _ -. _. -_ _. _. ____ - r � ,_--_---_-,_____ / , ,-._ - - x I / r._ / I rtu/ _--_' -- _."'Nt ----_ x/fi, `fj /. . -' �"- .:'Its .- - _ r , /� /�'�-'�\ / 'ram^' _ ,. - , 2 0U0 80 HOPE DR / V t / e l er',--..�i�•._.� /y/ ' „0 �� -� - .111(. , - J r, ----- - - --- - ---- - /J, J i ,� I'm 1, +�■� tl►d lF�AtJII� SEAYIC� COAPORATRAI ANC/1 U M/ RAGE 4A L 922 70 •w I w __�_1.1 r ,I., 1 ,;� I 0um"T♦1/1.M am atinomm11a1.a Raf..i - 1 ---_- r»A1M11 TY r 1 ,,Y•M1,Iwt _- ,.•es,,,w .� . -- _ __ ! w •av rw■.r.,w„..,,w /AWT'V'1 .Y5',1 V V _-_ ' __- r� - _ _ .m.IN" Oil ♦C1A�a 1rOAM1A rl .1w&Vwrlr% "j-, 1 '' 11,Me,000 r l 1.• _. __- ow t/ v+�9.7� A-'1�. - rs•wwl,rr 't / r r \., .4r%w. s11 --. t� I I,9 f(,0 a 1,9♦1,600 a . 11 r I „ _. _.