The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutTT 19575 PP 13-83 SAN RAFAEL AVENUE/CONDOS 1985 PRFX%l .SE FLAN _.__ I TENTATIVE .TRACT/ ) _ ZONE CHANCE_ __.-- PARCEL iV9mP VARAINCE REFER .,1_ 0 APPLICANT:- I.00AI ION_ REQUESI :--a -- = EXISTING ZONE:PREPARATION PROGRESS DATE BY COMMENTS APPLICATION RECEIVED 9 ?33 (P✓ I_EEA-F-PUBLICATION SENT _NOTICES SENT F1ELf.> INVESTIGATION , __DEPTS. NOTIFIED BUILDING i- ENGINEEF�ING _P_OL I(' E RECREATION & PARKS SCHOOL DISTRICT DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS FLOOD CONTROL PRELIMINARY MEETING STAFF RE PORT l C-1 L FINAI_�fll_AN APPROVAL PRECISE PLAN (6) - LANDSCAPING PLAN (5) PLAN. DIRECTOR MOD. (6) -- --� HEARINGS & ACTIONS �_ DATE ACTION VOTE RI�VIf_1N -BOARD HEARING F?C. FiI:;ARING PUBLISHED PC. PUBLIC HEARING APPLICANT NOTIFIED C.C. PLJBI_ IC HEARING ORDINANCE NO. RESOLUTION NO. EFFECTIVE' DATE � RECUI�DED FOR DATA- BANK ZONING' MAP CORRECTED CITY OF PALM DESERT DEPARTMENT Of COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission DATE: December 17, 1985 CASE NO'S: PP 13-83,/IT 19575 and 247 MF REQUEST: Approval of a one year extension of time for a 5 unit residential condominium project on the east side of San Rafael south of Catalina Way. APPLICANT: 1. BACKGROUND: A. PREVIOUS APPROVAL: The precise plan and tentative map were approved by the planning commission on December 6, 1983. The tentative map was originally approved for a two year period. 11 . REQUEST: The applicant filed a timely request for approval of a one year extension. The applicant indicates that the reason for extension is the difficulty in the time of the approval with the project he has underway in Texas. III. RECOMMENDATION: Staff feels this request is acceptable and therefore, recommends approval of a one year extension to December 26, 1986. IV. ATTACHMENTS: A. Letter of Request Prepared by Reviewed and Approval by /dlg Vi 4 S no TP E & R BUILDERS 3 1R-I:AIR WAY AVENUE, SUITE F-200 i i c v. CTA MESA. CALIFORNIA 92626 - NViRCNVENTAL SERVICES CITY OF PALM DESERT .2 9�J /y2 f15V9 X- 71 1p/ /�" ./- 0pw� au%�* /7yVU/U/p A#,T. 7 3 Sio rirr c/k' -.xl 4r fexl'/H /hoot 14A 9 y z G r �: PI � 3-�3 /�/? l i/• 9�7J C < TAYPJ7'b.C� Ace `mow �Plnxj 1,cw 14w e (714) 432-0681 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION JANUARY 15, 1985 Chairman Crites asked if anyone present wished to speak in FAVOR or OPPOSITION to this project. Hearing no one, the public testimony was closed. Action: Moved by Commissioner Wood, seconded by Commissioner Richards, to approve the findings as presented by staff. Moved by Commissioner Wood, seconded by Commissioner Richards, adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 1027, approving CUP 84-13, subject to conditions as amended. VIII. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS A. Case Nos. PP 13-83 and TT 19575 J & J INVESTORS, Applicant Clarification of approval period for five unit condominium project on east side of San Rafael Avenue, 270 feet south of Catalina Way. Action: Moved by Commissioner Downs, seconded by Commissioner Richards, to clarify approval period as recommended by staff. Carried 5-0. B. Case No. PP 01-82 - J.P. CONSTRUCTION, INC., Applicant Approval of a minor modification to allow outside storage and changes in a parking lot area for an existing 11,800 square foot industrial building on the north side of Mayfair Drive, east of Green Way. Action: Moved by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner Erwood, to approve modification by minute motion. Carried 5-0. IX. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS PATRICIA POWERS asked for approval of Case Nos. PMW 84-4 and PMW 85-3. Action: Moved by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner Wood, to approve PMW 84-4 and PMW 85-3 by minute motion. Carried 5-0. X. COMMENTS A. Commissioner Wood expressed concern regarding projects being approved in the La Palma Specific Plan district before the report from that committee was completed. B. Mr. Diaz discussed setting a date for a joint city council/planning commission session. The commission felt any Friday would be acceptable except for January 25, 1985. The commission noted that a two week advance notice would be appreciated. XI. ADJOURNMENT Moved by Commissioner Wood, seconded by Commissioner Downs, to adjourn the meeting. Carried 5-0. The meeting was adjourned at 4:47 p.m. RAMON A. DIAZ, Secre& ATTEST: BUFORD CRITES, Chairman Am 'I- -7- 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NOTICE OF ACTION Date: JANUARY 21, 1985 J & J INVESTORS 3151 Airway Avenue, #F-200 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Re: PP 13-83 and TT 19575 The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of January 15, 1985. By minute motion indicated that initial approval was valid to December 6, 1985. Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the director of environmental services, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. RAMON A. DIAZ, SECRRY PLANNING COMMISSION RAD/tm cc: File(s) C.V. Water District Palm eAjert Water & Serviced 2)wrict 44.500 PORTOLA AVENUE BOX 161 PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92261 BOARD OF DIRECTORS: Phone.(619)346-6338 ROBERT C. H. LAWMAN. President R CLAIR MCDONOUGH SHARON K. EPPSi �f PHYLLIS GRIMr. John D Secretary January 6,1984 Lill JAN 1904 Mr. John A. Smith Warner Engineering 7245 Joshua Lane , Suite A WARNER ENGINLra-ING Yucca Valley , California 92284 W.O. RE : Tentative . Tract No. 19575 ' J & J Investors Dear Mr . Smith: In response to your letter dated December 21 , 1983 , regarding the above referenced project , please be advised of the following : 1 . The District would allow that a wooden fence be constructed along the Northerly property within our existing easement . A masonry wall would impose a heavy load on the existing water main and will not be permitted. 2 . The District will require that an agreement be executed to allow the construction of a wooden fence , subject to our conditions . 3 . The existing water main has been in service for many years . Any damage done to the water main during the construction of the fence or at any other time in the future , must be repaired at the property owner' s expense. 4 . During construction , all care possible must be exercized to avoid any damage to the water main . 5 . The District must be notified 48 hours prior to the start of any construction in the vicinity of the existing water main . 6 . If the main is damaged during the construction or at any time in the future , and the District is forced to repair the main due to the property owner ' s lack of response to the problem, the property owner will be billed for all related costs on a time and materials basis , including any related engineering consultation. Mr. John A. Smith Page 2 of 2 When you wish to proceed on this matter, or if you have any questions in regard to the above, please let us know. Very truly yours , Robert Lawman, President Palm Desert Water and Services District RL:RJM: dm CC : Mainiero, Smith and Associates , Inc . i, MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION NOVEMBER 15, 1983 VII. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Case Nos. PP 13-83 an�TT 1, 9575 - )& J INVESTORS, Applicants Request for approval of a precise planplan of design and a single lot tentative tract map to permit a five unit residential condominium development in the R-2 zone on the east side of San Rafael, 270 feet south of Catalina. Mr. Smith reviewed the staff report and indicated that the architectural commission had already reviewed the plans and gave preliminary approval. Staff recommended approval. Chairman Wood opened the public hearing and asked if the applicant wished to make a presentation. MR. BILL WARNER, 7245 Joshua Lane, Yucca Valley, concurred with staff's findings but stated that the developer requested the possibility of serving that area on septic tanks with sewer connections installed to the property line for eventual connection to sewers when available. This would modify Condition No. 29. Mr. Diaz felt that use of septic tanks should not be expanded in the area and this was not an unusual hardship on the developer. He pointed out that developers are often required to bring main sewer lines across areas to serve a given project. Further discussion continued regarding the location of the sewer system and it was concluded that the developer needed more time to discuss this problem with staff. Moved by Commissioner Crites, seconded by Commissioner Erwood, to continue this case to the meeting of December 6, 1983, for further evaluation. Carried unanimously 4-0. B. Case Nos. PP 16-83 and PMW 06-83 - CABAK, RANDALL, JASPER, GRIFFITHS ASSOCIATES, Applicants Request for approval of a precise plan, parcel map waiver and Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact to allow a lot consolidation to permit construction of industrial buildings totaling 10,400 square feet with associated parking in the 5.1., S.P. zone located on the west side of Eclectic Street, north of 42nd Street. Mr. Smith reviewed the staff report and recommended approval. Chairman Wood opened the public hearing and asked if the applicant wished to make a presentation. MR. JOHN JASPER, architect, Menlo Park, agreed with the proposed conditions and was present for any questions the commission might have. Chairman Wood asked if anyone present wished to speak in FAVOR or OPPOSITION to this case. There being none, the public hearing was closed. Moved by Commissioner Crites, seconded by Commissioner Erwood, to approve the findings as recommended by staff. Carried unanimously 4-0. ' Moved by Commissioner Crites, seconded by Commissioner Erwood, to adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 902, approving PP 16-83 and PMW 06-83, subject to conditions. Carried unanimously 4-0. -2- 4 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT,CAUFORNIA92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NOTICE OF ACTION Date: December 9, 1983 J do J Investors c/o J.N. Ewart, Jr. 890 Town and Country Road Orange, CA_9 668 Re: PP 13-83 nd TT 19575 The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of December 6, 1983. Approved by Resolution No. 904 Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the director of environmental services, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. RAMON A. DIAZ, SECRETARY PLANNING COMMISSION RAD/lcr cc: Coachella Valley Water District File N •4 i PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 904 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PRECISE PLAN OF DESIGN AND A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A FIVE UNIT RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM ON THE EAST SIDE OF SAN RAFAEL AVENUE 270 FEET SOUTH OF CATALINA WAY. CASE NOS PP 13-83 and TT 19575 WHEREAS, the planning commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, W did on the 15th day of November, 1983, hold a duly noticed public hearing and continued public hearing on December 6, 1983, to consider the request of 3 do 3 INVESTORS for approval of a precise plan of design and a tentative tract map to allow the development of five condominium units in an R-2 zone on the east side of San Rafael Avenue, 270 feet south of Catalina Way. WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedures to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 80-8911, in that the director of environmental services has determined that the project is a Class 3 categorical exemption for purposes of CEQA and no further documentation is necessary. WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said commission did find the following facts and reasons to exist to justify the granting of said precise plan of design. 1. The design of the precise plan will not substantially depreciate property values in the vicinity. 2. The precise plan will not unreasonably interfere with the use or enjoyment of property in the vicinity by the occupants thereof for lawful purposes. 3. The precise plan will not endanger the public peace, health, - safety or general welfare. WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said planning commission did find the following facts and reasons as justified in the staff report for TT 19575 dated March 2, 1982, on file in the department of environmental services, to exist to approve the tentative tract map: 1. That the proposed map is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. 2. That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the type of development. 4. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development. 5. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. 6. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements are ` not likely to cause serious public health problems. 7. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision. - 1 - 1 PLANNING COMMSSION RESOLUTION NO. 904 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the planning commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the commission in this case. 2. That approval of Precise Plan 13-83 and Tentative Tract Map 19575 is hereby granted for reasons subject to the attached conditions. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 6th day of December, 19939 by the following vote, to wit: AYES: CRITES, DOWNS, ERWOOD, RICHARDS AND WOOD NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE RALPH B. WOOD, Chairman ATTEST: RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary Lz� 'pa PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 904 -EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of Approval Case Nos. PP 13-83 and TT 19575 Department of Environmental Services: a 1. The development of the property shall conform substantially with exhibits on file with the department of environmental services, as modified by the following conditions. 2. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein in addition to all municipal ordinances and state and federal statutes now in force or which hereafter may be in force. 3. Construction of this project shall commence within one year from the date of approval unless an extension of time is granted; otherwise said approval shall become null and void and of no effect. 4. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contemplated by this approval, the applicant shall first obtain permits and/or clearance from the following agencies: Riverside County Department of Health Palm Desert Architectural Commission City Fire Marshal Coachella Valley Water District Palm Desert Community Services District Evidence of said permits or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to the department of building and safety at the time of issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. Department of Public Works: 5. Drainage and signalization fund fees as required by city ordinance, shall be paid prior to recordation of the final map. 6. Drainage facilities shall be provided per Ordinance No. 218 and the master drainage plan to the specifications of the director of public works. 7. Full half-street public improvements, including traffic safety lighting and sidewalk, shall be installed in accordance with city standards. 8. Improvement plans for water and sewer systems shall be approved by the respective service districts. 9. Complete improvement and grading plans and specifications shall be submitted as required by ordinance to the city engineer for checking and approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. The subdivider shall submit "as- built" plans prior to acceptance of the subdivision improvements by the city. 10. Additional storm drain construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study by the private engineer. 11. ` Landscaping maintenance on San Rafael shall be provided by the homeowners, association. 12. This property is in the AO Depth 1' Zone as shown on the flood insurance rate map. A flood hazard report, as required by Ordinance No. 221 (Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance) shall be submitted to the public works department. The report must be approved by the flood review committee prior to approval of the grading plan. - 3 - PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 904 13. Five foot right-of-way dedication on San Rafael for a thirty foot half width residential street. 14. Off-site improvement plans to be approved by the public works department and a surety bond posted to guarantee the off-site improvements prior to the map recording. 15. Install a water system capable of delivering 2500 GPM fire flow from any fire hydrant for a two hour duration in addition to domestic supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement. 16. Install a Riverside County super fire hydrant located within 250' of building measured along an approved travel way. A Exterior surface of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow, and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. B.Curbs shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. 17. Prior to recordation of the final map, the developer shall furnish the original and three (3) copies of the water system plan to the fire marshal for review. 18. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and approved by the water company, with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system in Tract No. 19575 and PP 13-83 is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the fire marshal". Upon approval, the original plan will be returned to the developer. 19. Prior to delivery of combustible materials to the building site, the required water system shall be installed operating and delivering the required flow. 20. No parking allowed in driveway access. Palm Desert Water and Services District: 21. A concrete block wall is shown on the north property line which is coincident in alignment with a 10- inch steel district water main and encroaches within the five foot easement given for water main service purposes. If a wall is to be built: A. Care must be exercised when excavating for the wall footing so as not to damage the 10 - inch steeel water main. B. All costs for damages and/or repair to the main due to construction of the wall shall be borne by the developer. 22. The owner of the property shall execute an agreement that provides that if at any time in the future the water main requires repair, the owner shall pay for all costs related to the repair including the removal and replacement of the wall and any other improvements in the vicinity of the required repair. 23. The district will install a 2-inch water meter at a cost of $2,000.00. 24. A frontage fee of $8.00 per foot will be imposed along San Rafael Avenue. 25. The water service installation charges will be as follows: One 2-inch water meter @ $2,000 $2,000.00 �- Frontage Fee for 79feet @ $8.00 $ 632.00 Total 2,632.00 26. All fees and meter installation charges must be paid before the installation work will begin. 27. At least one week advance notice should be given. - 4 - PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 904 28. A hydrant exists at the northwest corner of the property. The addition of any new fire hydrants or the relocation of any existing fire hydrants if required by the city fire marshal would be completed at an additional charge to be determined upon request. Coachella Valley Water District: 29. This area shall be annexed to District Nos. 54 and 80 of the Coachella Valley Water District for sanitation service. /pa - 5 - City of Palm Desert Staff Report TO: Planning Commission DATE: December 6, 1983 CASE NOS: PP 13-83 and TT 19575 REQUEST: Approval of a precise plan of design and a single lot tentative tract map to permit a five unit residential condominium development in the R-2 zone on the east side of San Rafael, 270 feet south of Catalina. APPLICANT: J & J. INVESTORS c/o J.N. Ewart, Jr. 890 Town and Country Road Orange, CA 92668 I. BACKGROUND: This application was reviewed by the commission at its November 15, 1983 meeting. The applicants' representative expressed concern with respect to the requirements of the Coachella Valley Water District. Consideration was continued to this date to allow the applicants to clarify the issue with the water district. II. DISCUSSION: The applicants have a letter which resolves the matter to their satisfaction. The recommendation .and conditions to be imposed on the approval are unchanged from those conditioned in the November 15, 1983 staff report. III. RECOMMENDATION: 1. Approve the findings delineated in the staff report dated November 15, 1983. 2. Adopt Resolution No. approving a precise plan of design and a single lot tentative tract map to permit a five unit residential condominium project on the east side of San Rafael Avenue 270 feet south of Catalina Way. IV. ATTACHMENTS: A. Draft Resolution B. Copy of Staff Report Dated November 15, 1983 Prepared by:__ �� Reviewed and approved byoL•� /pa O C[ - 1 - PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PRECISE PLAN OF DESIGN AND A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A FIVE UNIT RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM ON THE EAST SIDE OF SAN RAFAEL AVENUE 270 FEET SOUTH OF CATALINA WAY. CASE NOS. PP 13-83 and TT 19575 WHEREAS the planning commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 15th day of November, 1983, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider the request of J do J INVESTORS for approval of a precise plan of design and a tentative tract map to allow the development of five condominium units in an R-2 zone on the east side of San Rafael Avenue, 270 feet south of Catalina Way. has EAS cation of Palm DeserttRP Procedures t ol� Implement ctheplCalifornia withied hEnvirronmentalrequis Qof theuality City Resolution No. 80-8911, in that the director of environmental services has determined that the project is a Class 3 categorical exemption for purposes of CEQA and no further documentation is necessary. WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said commission did find the following facts and reasons to exist to justify the granting of said precise plan of design: I. The design of the precise plan will not substantially depreciate property values in the vicinity. 2• The precise plan will not unreasonably interfere with the use or enjoyment of property in the vicinity by the occupants thereof for lawful purposes. 3. The precise plan will not endanger the public peace, health, safety or general welfare. WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said planning commission did find the following facts and reasons as justified in the staff report for TT 19575 dated March 2, 1982, on file in the department of environmental services, to exist to approve the tentative tract map: I. That the proposed map is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. 2• That the design or improvment of the proposed subdivision is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the type of development. 4. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development. 5• That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. 6. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems. 7. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the planning commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: I. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the commission in this case. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2. That approval of Precise Plan 13-83 and Tentative Tract Map 19575 is hereby granted for reasons subject to the attached conditions. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 15th day of November, 1983, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RALPH WOOD, Chairman ATTEST: RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of Approval Case Nos. PP 13-83 and TT 19575 Department of Environmental Services: I. The development of the property shall conform substantially with exhibits on file with the department of environmental services as modified by the following conditions. 2. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein which are in addition to all municipal ordinances and state and federal statutes now in force or which hereafter may be in force. 3. Construction of a portion of said project shall commence within one year from the date of final approval unless an extension of time is granted; otherwise said approval shall become null, void and of no effect whatsoever. 4. Prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contemplated by this approval, the applicant shall first obtain permits and/or clearance from the following agencies: Riverside County Department of Health Architectural Commission City Fire Marshal Coachella Valley Water District Palm Desert Community Services District Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to the department of building and safety at the time of issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. Department of Public Works: 5. Drainage and signalization fund fees as required by city ordinance, shall be paid prior to recordation of the final map. 6. Drainage facilities shall be provided per Ordinance No. 218 and the master drainage plan to the specifications of the director of public works. 7. Full half-street public improvements, including traffic safety lighting and sidewalk, shall be installed in accordance with city standards. 8. Improvement plans for water and sewer systems shall be approved by the respective service districts. 9. Complete improvement and grading plans and specifications shall be submitted as required by ordinance to the city engineer for checking and approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. The subdivider shall submit "as- built" plans prior to acceptance of the subdivision improvements by the city. 10. Additional storm drain construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study by the private engineer. 11. Landscaping maintenance on San Rafael shall be provided by the homeowners' association. 12. This property is in the AO Depth P Zone as shown on the flood insurance rate map. A flood hazard report, as required by Ordinance No. 221 (F'ood Damage Prevention Ordinance) shall be submitted to the public wo.ks department. The report must be approved by the flood review committee prior to approval of the grading plan. 13. Five foot right-of-way dedication on San Rafael for a thrity foot half width residential street. 14. Off-site improvement plans to be approved by the public works department and a surety bond posted to guarantee the off-site improvements prior to the map recording. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. Fire Marshal: 15. Install a water system capable of delivering 2500 GPM fire flow from any fire hydrant for a two hour duration in addition to domestic supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement. 16. Install a Riverside County super fire hydrant located within 250' of building measured along an approved travel way. A. Exterior surface of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow, and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. B. Curbs shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. 17. Prior to recordation of the final map, the developer shall furnish the original and three (3) copies of the water system plan to the fire marshal for review. 18. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and approved by the water company, with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system in Tract No. 19575 and PP 13-83 is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the fire marshal". Upon approval, the original plan will be returned to the developer. 19. Prior to delivery of combustible materials to the building site, the required water system shall be installed operating and delivering the required flow. 20. No parking allowed in driveway access. Palm Desert Water and Services District: 21. A concrete block wall is shown on the north property line which is coincident in alignment with a 10 - inch steel district water main and encroaches within the five foot easement given for water main service purposes. If a wall is to be built: A. Care must be exercised when excavating for the wall footing so as not to damage the 10 - inch steel water main. B. All costs for damages and/or repair to the main due to construction of the wall shall be borne by the developer. 22. The owner of the property shall execute an agreement that provides that if at any time in the future the water main requires repair, the owner shall pay for all costs related to the repair including the removal and replacement of the wall and any other improvements in the vicinity of the required repair. 23. The district will install a 2-inch water meter at a cost of $2,000.00. 24. A frontage fee of $8.00 per foot will be imposed along San Rafael Avenue. 25. The water service installation charges will be as follows: One 2-inch water meter @ $2,000 $2,000.00 Frontage Fee for 79feet @ $8.00 $ 632.00 Total 2,632.00 26. All fees and meter installation charges must be paid before the installation work will begin. 27. At least one week advance notice should be given. 28. A hydrant exists at the northwest corner of the property. The addition of any new fire hydrants or the relocation of any existing fire hydrants if required by the city fire marshal would be corrnleted at an additional charge to be determined upon request. Coachella Valley Water District: 29. This area shall be annexed to District Nos. 54 and 80 of the Coachella Valley Water District for sanitation service. City of Palm Desert Staff Report TO: Planning Commission DATE: November 15, 1983 CASE NOS: PP 13-83 and TT 19575 REQUEST: Approval of a precise plan of design and a single lot tentative tract map to permit a five unit residential condominium development in the R-2 zone on the east side of San Rafael, 270 feet south of Catalina. APPLICANT: J & J. INVESTORS c/o J.N. Ewart, Jr. 890 Town and Country Road Orange, CA 92668 I. BACKGROUND: A. DESCRIPTION OF SITE: The site is vacant, relatively flat and is 22,284 square feet in area. B. ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE: North: R-2/Single Family Dwellings South: R-2/Single Family Dwelling East: R-I/Vacant, Single Family Dwelling West: R-2/Apartments C. GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION: Medium Density Residential, 5-7 d.u./acre. H. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicants propose to construct a five unit residential condominium project on the subject property. The property is a 22,284 square foot site located on the east side of San Rafael some 280 feet south of Catalina. Approximately half of the property on the street is vacant while the remainder is occupied by older structures which would not meet the city's present architectural standards. III. SITE PLAN: The property is 79 feet wide by a depth of 289 feet. Due to this lot configuration, the site plan has been laid out with a center driveway with carports located on either side. To the east are the five units along with the recreation facilities (i.e. pool, spa, gazebo and open space). The zoning allows one dwelling unit for every four thousand square feet of land area; therefore, on this 22,284 square foot lot up to five units are permitted. All units will have two bedrooms with two baths and will be approximately 1102 square feet. The plans have been preliminarily reviewed by the architectural commission. Following this preliminary review the plans were referred back to the applicant to restudy the building elevations. It was basically felt that the architecture presented was not up to the standard which the city now requires. - 1 - CASE NOS. PP 13-83 and NOVEMBER 15, 1983 TT 19575 IV. ANALYSIS: A. REQUIRED FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL OF PRECISE PLAN: I. The design of the precise plan will not substantially depreciate property values in the vicinity. Justification: The design of the use is compatible with other residential uses existing in the vicinity. 2. The precise plan will not unreasonably interfere with the use or enjoyment of property in the vicinity by the occupants thereof for lawful purposes. Justification: The surrounding land in the vicinity is zoned for similar types of uses as proposed and owners would not be deprived the use of their land. 3. The precise plan will not endanger the public peace, health, safety or general welfare. Justification: The precise plan complies with all code requirements and will receive architectural commission approval and will not be detrimental to the Public peace, health, safety or general welfare. B. FINDINGS: Specific findings and justifications must be made in order to approve a tentative tract map. Those findings are as follows: I. That the proposed map is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. 2. That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the type of development. 4. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development. 5. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. 6. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems. 7. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. - 2 - CASE NOS. PP 13-83 and TT 19575 NOVEMBER 15, 1983 B. FINDINGS (CONTINUED) The proposed tentative tract map is for a single lot subdivision for condominium purposes. The tract map will not result in the subdivision of the lot but will permit the sale of each of the five units. The justifications in support of the findings are as follows: 1. The zoning of the property, R-2, is consistent with the general plan land use designation of medium density 5-7 d.u./acre. The development of five residential condominium units is in conformity with the zoning; therefore, the project is consistent with the general plan. 2. The design of the project is consistent with the provisions of the general plan. 3 & 4. The site is of sufficient size, shape and topography for the proposed type and density of development. 5 & 6. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or serious public health problems because it will be developed in concert with applicable local, state and federal regulations. 71. There is a five foot wide utility easement along the north property line. Due to the layout of the project, this easement will not be affected. Based on the above, there appears to be sufficient justification for approval. C. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The director of environmental services has determined that the proposed project is a Class 3 categorical exemption for purposes of CEQA and no further documentation is necessary. D. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Based on the findings in the staff report and draft resolution, staff recommends approval of Precise Plan 13-83 and Tentative Tract 19575 by adoption of Planning Commission Resolution No. , subject to conditions. "A resolution of the planning commission of the City of Palm Desert, approving a precise plan and a tentative tract map to allow construction of five condominium units in the R-2 zone located on the east side of San Rafael Avenue, 270 feet south of Catalina Way". V. ATTACHMENTS: A. Draft Resolution B. Legal Notice C. Submitted Plans Prepared by: Reviewed and approved by: /pa - 3 - - -- — - -- --- --- WAY -- Q APART NTS 73/n 4 T40 VACANT 27 34 33 28 w 26i LEGE/VD 44430 \4443Z 4 4443/ VACANT DD KEY 7-0 OWNER VACANT � q L/5T 2 4447o 37 �C I 29 Q 25 23 OOl PARCEL A0DRES5 VACANT 4447(0 44476 44447 4447to 74472 35 3/ 90 24 (22 38 VACANT VACANT APARTMENTS VACANT 4f500 / /4 2/ VACANT O 4453Z 11505 11 O VACANT O SAS 4oy�rr'fVO VACANT l4 \TS 6• Tr\ {6 ! 99600 O 13 VACANT q \ VACANT s h4 ,O v VACANT >> a �Q 63s yp 1y OVAcAA/T SCALE:/ /ODD WAY saw I , \ /� 300 RADIU5 MAP CASE NO �.......c.u. NOTED •�.ov.o o QG A DAM, p�2 / did INVESTOR 7/4-773-2120 8?0 TOWN�COUNTRYRD, ORA A/C E I CALIF l >IwCLt IAMIIr \ a,wcle rAMllr 1 I l�waLL aroa r) &4614A Mll JJ77 'PAn2 I ' R{YLLf 1 •rI UOM R/YIRf i]/..DLRO RLVIYIf U V ,,,a{,.t {IOi.I/� , .14 t.,Ls I,Yt.,L• {,Yt.,t, v • ./lad h �. -/— ,a° / n I / I it 1 r� Snti Sa ls^E 2 J o" r / IN 4 3 ` lo�o' .,� +uaow'Rr wulpuauwGl �� O , 4YPLL;°rYLIIIYL t � I (91wf1L flPtr/ r , w O vRJJtG] Y]i n 1 • SII� <a+ V f/ My PLYCh.�al.c lw pll 6 II.:!p'td J Of VELD 7ER5: ✓Li.l°,E D7-F, ' .J t n_ VICINITY MAP ` SITE PLAN NOR ELEVATION i NO IL Iv[il (.II LLIII. N A'cl.'111 fLl VAlla lr I r..e,u.. ,a.., r..n�N•. wu i i vnli,IN i 7il�l 50(/1 N EL E 1'A7ION a?JHINL N04IN 1 r r r r I' I r� rfll ILI 1 EA5 vA)/ON SOU I N N S—vA7N-- N a oon.wc iTi ---'.• loon•uG wo�rw lot PHONE 'I KITCHEN - Nw w MASTEI. MASTtk SNP; KITCHEN 1 1 ' BENNOOM BEDNOOM I Ito j Q TH I IIr In U � Idi si«�.- ? ��G BA UINING •�I IN NM f C a 111 H-` IRI_V BATH2' �- - LA lien STO f UNIT I _ fJI+ -- UNIT 2 I 3IF � C> uio u 1 u«nr �v l LIVING 'v BEHROOM2 BEU1400AI2 LIVING AM RM O we. 4 ,eovr IlJ A I u » NOTE: so4• e'e' a�e' � [o ,' ee , LIVING Aki A VER UNIT It02.t5O A a I I I I SOO7N FtEVATIOA' I � 1 I �l _77— I111 r! I / •>rf NOA-IN EL f V47/ON -lrPwCdlL •..ru.r _ 1w rwn cl n wEOT EL EVAI/ON TEAIT ELEIATION— �[.O:'l "l AN lomw�uii—�---- uowu`+a'we!T-- ---"- '- J ' � � I 4 l i i j LHo.l.40w � LUO.au OM L/ v./ ,M 4 ilivr/ca 1 i {.RR F PLNS.E ELF i u z_.. i 1 O I i % _ I � ,�u� Kp� BEDROOM 2 1_ I MASTER Q BEDROOM L4j y A C HEN ' Wt MASTER MASTER KITCHEN I JO BEDROOM BEDROOM L^� ^- LIN 9 I I .AO REF _ - HEW J UNIT5 I n TH I D -'4 ( BATH I ? LIVING DINING I KITCHEN I RAN/ING "s 1 RIANIING RM RM f J - Ro V/ BA,H 2� BATH 2 T d�'uD UNIT 3 _ _ _ UNIT 4 ° .s � - ag e�" f LIVING BEDROOM 2 BEDROOM 2 LIVING HM NM I NHIE5'. I L� I IVINL AI4i A PLR UNII H02.Ib� I In U H< aL5 --.'moo• - Ia,a' { 3 � I I i r ti ute I I ° I NORI"ELEVAI/ON T'/f [u[q,NG 5[YIIN %1'•/'u• I �tf ( r r� lY�,•_ I FOUNDATION PLAN lr' � Ilf I • L(/yN ea'A[[ FOUNOA7ON PLgN T '� 1✓% PCIR CIRPWI h-- ---- L,N{O(=,OM4if ib,.(I V✓fN-'_� _ ______ _ . ._nL e.<Roo/.tA(IeR� ncRoor N,aF,fAt A _ -__---r. - nPPc - •ii'aa :,01/7NELEVA7,ON — 11 It [4Lh,VL N4RIN �//i.0• �� O � y 4 �OI e,✓O✓.1[[ X•O.L. 11 It, ROOF L<OI(( ✓R rrp �Llpos, ' ROOF PLAN EA5) ELEVAI/GN WE51 ElEV4710N FL DO;,'7't AN mon,Nc W..I V""G' —A .n IIGI _I1� 7 ; � 1QII — I 'r ECEVA7/ON _ 1 r� I•IIO.F IeM • f[f [� HOOf /•L 4N _ NOTE N'.,[L• 4CAIi CAIIPOP(t) N✓If0 Palm 2)eeerl Water & Serviced 2'31picl 44.500 PORTOLA AVENUE BOX 161 BOARD OF DIRECTORS: PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92261 ROBERT C. H. LAWMAN. President Phone:I69)3e8.63M R. CLAIR MCDONOUGR SHARON K. EPPS October 6 , 1983 PHYLLIS GRIGGS, Secretary Mr. Ramon Diaz t's] City of Palm Desert 45- 275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert , California 92260 �i CITY GF Re : Case No. TT 19575 , PP13- 83 Dear, Mr . Diaz : In response to your letter regarding the above referenced project , we would like to make the following comments : 1. A concrete block wall is shown on the north property line which is coincident in alignment with a 10- inch steel District water main and encroaches within the 5 foot easement given for water main service purposes . If a wall is to be built : 1) Care must be excercised when excavat- ing for the wall footing so as not to damage the 10- inch steel water main. 2) All costs for damages and/or repair to the main due to con- struction of the wall shall be borne by the developer. 2 . The owner of the property shall execute an agreement that provides that if at any time in the future the water main requires repair, the owner shall pay for all costs related to the repair including the removal and replacement of the wall and any other improvements in the vicinity of the required repair. 3. The District will install a 2 -inch water meter at a cost of $2 , 000. 00. 4 . A frontage fee of $8 . 00 per foot will be imposed along San Rafael Avenue . 5. The water service installation charges will be as follows : M Mr. Ramon Diaz October 6 , 1983 Page 2 One 2-inch water meter @ $2 ,000 $2 ,000. 00 Frontage Fee for 79 feet @ $8 . 00 632 . 00 TOTAL 3-2 , Y7—.0-U 6. All fees and meter installation charges must be paid before the installation work will begin. 7. At least one week advance notice should be given. 8 . A hydrant exists at the northwest corner of the property. The addition of any new fire hy- drants or the relocation of any existing , if re- quired by the City Fire Marshall would be com- pleted at an additional charge to be determined upon request . If you have any questions in regard to the above , please do not hesitate to contact us . Very truly yours , Robert Lawman , President Palm Desert Water $ Services District RL: RJM:vb INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM City of Palm Desert TO: Department of Environmental Services FROM: Director of Public Works SUBJECT: TT 19575, PP 13-83 (J 8 J INVESTORS) DATE:October 6, 1983 The following should be considered as conditions of approval : (1) Drainage and signalization fund fees, as required by City ordinance, shall be paid prior to recordation of the final map. (2) Drainage facilities shall be provided per Ordinance No. 218 and the Master Drainage Plan to the specifications of the Director of Public Works. (3) Full half-street public improvements, including traffic safety lighting and sidewalk, shall be installed in accordance with City standards. (4) Improvement plans for water and sewer systems shall be approved by the respec- tive service districts. (5) Complete improvement and grading plans and specifications shall be submitted as required by ordinance to the City Engineer for checking and approval be- fore construction of any improvements is commenced. The subdivider shall submit "as-built" plans prior to acceptance of the subdivision improvements by the City. (6) Additional storm drain construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study by the private engineer. (7) Landscaping maintenance on San Rafael shall be provided by the homeowners association. (8) This property is in the AO Depth 1' Zone as shown on the Flood Insurance Rate Map. A flood hazard report, as required by Ordinance No. 221 (Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance) shall be submitted to the Public Works Depart- ment. The report must be approved by the Flood Review Committee prior to approval of the grading plan. (9) Five-foot right-of-way dedication on San Rafael for a thirty-foot half width residential street: (10) Off-site improvement plans to be approved by the Public Works Department and a surety bond posted to guarantee the off-site improvements prior to the map recording. BARRY cCLELLAN, P.E. BDM/ms OCT - 7 1983 ENVIRO,%,: N':'AL SERVICES CITY OF PALM DESERT s..� RIVERSIDE COON_ CA + FIRE DEPARTMENT i 'Cb UAfY �~ IN COOPERATION WITH THE A, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY $, ,, RIVERSIi/Z ....,,, DAViD L. FLAKE FIRE CHiEF �'.!. ^,�. . - 210WE5TIAN1ACIATOAVE14UE ja83 PERRIS.CALIFORNIA 92370 TELEPHONE:(714)657.3183 Ramon A. Diaz Director of Environmental Services CST, - RANCHO MIRAGE FIRE STATIC City of Palm Desert 7R4NCHOIMIRAGEiCA92270 Pa1m7DeserLklyCAear Lane Er1V1F t�f PaL ot& 1T , 92260 r„� Reference: Tentative Tract No. 19575, PP 13-83 Dear Mr. Diaz, Provide the following fire protection in accordance with the Uniform Fire Code: I . Install a water system capable of delivering 2500 GPM fire flow from any fire hydrant for a two hour duration in addition -to domestic supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measLrement. 2. Install a Riverside County super fire hydrant located within 250' of building measured along an approved travel way. A. Exterior surface of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow, and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. B. Curbs shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. 3. Prior to recordation of the final map, the developer shall furnish the original and three (3) copies of the water system plan to the Fire Marshal for review, 4. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and approved by the water company, with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system in Tract No. 19575, PP 13-83 is in accordance with the require- ments prescribed by the Fire Marshal ." Upon approval , the original plan will be returned to the developer. 5• Prior to delivery of combustible materials to the building site, the required water system shall be installed, operating and delivering the required flow, 6. No parking allowed in driveway access . Very truly yours , DAVID L. FLAKE Fire Chief 4� " �cG y�_ By, ERIC L. VOGT dpm Fire Marshal cc: Jim Zimmerman CVWD ESi ABLISHED IN 1918 AS A PUB,•. AGENCY COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT POST OFFICE BOX 1058 COACHELLA, CALIFORNIA 92236 • TELEPHONIM"l 390 26SI DIRECTORS (619) RAYMONDR RUMMONDS.PRESIDENT OFFICERS TELOS CODEKAS VICE PRESIDENT LOWELL O WEEKS.GENERAL MANAGER-CHIEF ENGINEER JOHN P.POWELL October 11 1983 BERNARD1NESUTION.SECREI4RY PAUL W NICHOLS VICTORB HARDY,AUDITOR SIEVE D.BUXTON REDWINE ANDSHERRILL.ATTORNEYS File: 0163. 11 0721.1 _ ? 1983 Department of Environmental SerytJces ..L.NTAL SERVICES City of Palm Desert "'Iil :-F FALK! DESERT Post Office Box 1977 Palm Desert, California 92261 Gentlemen:, Subject: Tentative Tract 19575 This area is shown to be subject to shallow flooding and is designated Zone AO, depth 1 foot on Federal Flood Insurance rate maps which are in effect at this time. However, we expect the Federal Flood Insurance rate maps will be revised due to the construction -of the Palm Valley Stormwater Channel. The District will furnish sanitation service to this area in accordance with the current regulations of this District. This area shall be annexed to Improvement District Nos. 54 d 80 of Coachella Valley Water District for sanitation service. Yours very truly / JI, L owell 0. Weeks Gene l Manager-Chief Engineer CS:dlb cc: Riverside County Department of Public Health 46-209 Oasis Street Indio, California 92201 Attention: Don Park TRUE CONSERVATION USE WATER WISELY 3700 CENTRAL AVENUE • RIVERSIDE. CALIFORNIA R W. RIDDELL EA111,n Drrpion Drloroulion►pnnm Su Mailing Addnu ►.O. SOk 2200. RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92519 9 p•nr,or October 13, 1983 Location of Nearest Gas Main: San Rafael Ave. adjacent to Proposed Development City of Palm Desert Post Office Box 1977 Palm Desert, CA 92261 RE: Case No. TT19575, PP 13-83 Gentlemen: This letter is not to be interpreted as a contractual commitment to serve the Proposed project; but only as an information service. Its intent is to notify You that the Southern California Gas Company has facilities in the area where the above named project is proposed. Gas service to the project could be pro- vided from an existing main without any significant impact on the environment. The service would be in accordance with the Company's policies and extension rules on file with the California Public Utilities Commission at the time con- tractual arrangements are made. The availability of natural gas service, as set forth in this letter, is based upon present conditions of gas supply and regulatory policies. As a public Utility, the Southern California Gas Company is under the jurisdiction of the California Public Utilities Commission. we can also be affected by actions of federal regulatory agencies. Should these agencies take any action which affects gas supply or the condition under which service is available, gas ser- vice will be provided in accordance with revised conditions. We have developed several programs which are available, upon request, to provide assistance in selecting the most effective applications of energy conservation techniques for a particular project. If you desire further information on any Of our energy conservation programs, please contact our Area Market Services Manager, P. O. Box 6226, San Bernardino, CA 02417, hone (714) 884-9411. R. W. Ridde RWR:mac 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NOTICE OF ACTION Date: November 17, 1983 J & J Investors c/o J.N. Ewart, Jr. 890 Town and Country Road Orange, CA 92668 Re: PP 13-83 a d TT 19575 The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of November 15, 1983. Continued to December 6, 1983, at 7:00 p.m. Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the director of environmental services, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. R-AMON A. DIAZ, SECRE Ry PLANNING COMMISSION RAD/lcr cc: Coachella Valley Water District File City of Palm Desert Staff Report TO: Planning Commission DATE: November 15, 1983 CASE NOS: PP 13-83 and TT 19575 REQUEST: Approval of a precise plan of design and a single lot tentative tract map to permit a five unit residential condominium development in the R-2 zone on the east side of San Rafael, 270 feet south of Catalina. APPLICANT: J & J. INVESTORS c/o J.N. Ewart, Jr. 890 Town and Country Road Orange, CA 92668 I. BACKGROUND: A. DESCRIPTION OF SITE: The site is vacant, relatively flat and is 22,284 square feet in area. B. ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE: North: R-2/Single Family Dwellings South: R-2/Single Family Dwelling East: R-I/Vacant, Single Family Dwelling West: R-2/Apartments C. GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION: Medium Density Residential, 5-7 d.u./acre. II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicants propose to construct a five unit residential condominium project on the subject property. The property is a 22,284 square foot site located on the east side of San Rafael some 280 feet south of Catalina. Approximately half of the property on the street is vacant while the remainder is occupied by older structures which would not meet the city's present architectural standards. III. SITE PLAN: The property is 79 feet wide by a depth of 289 feet. Due to this lot configuration, the site plan has been laid out with a center driveway with carports located on either side. To the east are the five units along with the recreation facilities (i.e. pool, spa, gazebo and open space). The zoning allows one dwelling unit for every four thousand square feet of land area; therefore, on this 22,284 square foot lot up to five units are permitted. All units will have two bedrooms with two baths and will be approximately 1102 square feet. The plans have been preliminarily reviewed by the architectural commission. Following this preliminary review the plans were referred back to the applicant to restudy the building elevations. It was basically felt that the architecture presented was not up to the standard which the city now requires. - 1 - CASE NOS. PP 13-83 and TT 19575 NOVEMBER 15, 1983 IV. ANALYSIS: A. REQUIRED FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL OF PRECISE PLAN: 1. The design of the precise plan will not substantially depreciate property values in the vicinity. Justification: The design of the use is compatible with other residential uses existing in the vicinity. 2. The precise plan will not unreasonably interfere with the use or enjoyment of property in the vicinity by the occupants thereof for lawful purposes. Justification: The surrounding land in the vicinity is zoned for similar types of uses as proposed and owners would not be deprived the use of their land. 3. The precise plan will not endanger the public peace, health, safety or general welfare. Justification: The precise plan complies with all code requirements and will receive architectural commission approval and will not be detrimental to the public peace, health, safety or general welfare. B. FINDINGS: Specific findings and justifications must be made in order to approve a tentative tract map. Those findings are as follows: 1. That the proposed map is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. 2. That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the type of development. 4. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development. 5. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. 6. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems. 7. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. - 2 - CASE NOS. PP 13-83 and TT 19575 NOVEMBER 15, 1983 B. FINDINGS (CONTINUED) The proposed tentative tract map is for a single lot subdivision for condominium purposes. The tract map will not result in the subdivision of the lot but will permit the sale of each of the five units. The justifications in support of the findings are as follows: 1. The zoning of the property, R-2, is consistent with the general plan land use designation of medium density 5-7 d.u./acre. The development of five residential condominium units is in conformity with the zoning; therefore, the project is consistent with the general plan. 2. The design of the project is consistent with the provisions of the general plan. 3 & 4. The site is of sufficient size, shape and topography for the proposed type and density of development. 5 & 6. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or serious public health problems because it will be developed in concert with applicable local, state and federal regulations. 7. There is a five foot wide utility easement along the north property line. Due to the layout of the project, this easement will not be affected. Based on the above, there appears to be sufficient justification for approval. C. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The director of environmental services has determined that the proposed project is a Class 3 categorical exemption for purposes of CEQA and no further documentation is necessary. D. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Based on the findings in the staff report and draft resolution, staff recommends approval of Precise Plan 13-83 and Tentative Tract 19575 by adoption of Planning Commission Resolution No. subject to conditions. "A resolution of the planning commission of the City of Palm Desert, approving a precise plan and a tentative tract map to allow construction of five condominium units in the R-2 zone located on the east side of San Rafael Avenue, 270 feet south of Catalina Way". V. ATTACHMENTS: A. Draft Resolution B. Legal Notice C. Submitted Plans Prepared Reviewed and approved by: 7� /pa - 3 - PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PRECISE PLAN OF DESIGN AND A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A FIVE UNIT RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM ON THE EAST SIDE OF SAN RAFAEL AVENUE 270 FEET SOUTH OF CATALINA WAY. CASE NOS. PP 13-83 and TT 19575 WHEREAS the planning commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 15th day of November, 1983, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider the request of J & J INVESTORS for approval of a precise plan of design and a tentative tract map to allow the development of five condominium units in an R-2 zone on the east side of San Rafael Avenue, 270 feet south of Catalina Way. WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedures to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 80-8911, in that the director of environmental services has determined that the project is a Class 3 categorical exemption for purposes of CEQA and no further documentation is necessary. WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said commission did find the following facts and reasons to exist to justify the granting of said precise plan of design: 1. The design of the precise plan will not substantially depreciate property values in the vicinity. 2. The precise plan will not unreasonably interfere with the use or enjoyment of property in the vicinity by the occupants thereof for lawful purposes. 3. The precise plan will not endanger the public peace, health, safety or general welfare. WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said planning commission did find the following facts and reasons as justified in the staff report for TT 19575 dated March 2, 1982, on file in the department of environmental services, to exist to approve the tentative tract map: 1. That the proposed map is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. 2. That the design or improvment of the proposed subdivision is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the type of development. 4. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development. 5. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. 6. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems. 7. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the planning commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the commission in this case. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2. That approval of Precise Plan 13-83 and Tentative Tract Map 19575 is hereby granted for reasons subject to the attached conditions. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 15th day of November, 1983, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RALPH WOOD, Chairman ATTEST: RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. EXHIBIT "A" Conditions of Approval Case Nos. PP 13-83 and TT 19575 Department of Environmental Services: 1. The development of the property shall conform substantially with exhibits on file with the department of environmental services as modified by the following conditions. 2. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein which are in addition to all municipal ordinances and state and federal statutes now in force or which hereafter may be in force. 3. Construction of a portion of said project shall commence within one year from the date of final approval unless an extension of time is granted; otherwise said approval shall become null, void and of no effect whatsoever. 4. Prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contemplated by this approval, the applicant shall first obtain permits and/or clearance from the following agencies: Riverside County Department of Health Architectural Commission City Fire Marshal Coachella Valley Water District Palm Desert Community Services District Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to the department of building and safety at the time of issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. Department of Public Works: 5. Drainage and signalization fund fees as required by city ordinance, shall be paid prior to recordation of the final map. 6. Drainage facilities shall be provided per Ordinance No. 218 and the master drainage plan to the specifications of the director of public works. 7. Full half-street public improvements, including traffic safety lighting and sidewalk, shall be installed in accordance with city standards. 8. Improvement plans for water and sewer systems shall be approved by the respective service districts. 9. Complete improvement and grading plans and specifications shall be submitted as required by ordinance to the city engineer for checking and approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. The subdivider shall submit "as- built" plans prior to acceptance of the subdivision improvements by the city. 10. Additional storm drain construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study by the private engineer. 11. Landscaping maintenance on San Rafael shall be provided by the homeowners' association. 12. This property is in the AO Depth P Zone as shown on the flood insurance rate map. A flood hazard report, as required by Ordinance No. 221 (Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance) shall be submitted to the public works department. The report must be approved by the flood review committee prior to approval of the grading plan. 13. Five foot right-of-way dedication on San Rafael for a thrity foot half width residential street. 14. Off-site improvement plans to be approved by the public works department and a surety bond posted to guarantee the off-site improvements prior to the map recording. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. Fire Marshal: 15. Install a water system capable of delivering 2500 GPM fire flow from any fire hydrant for a two hour duration in addition to domestic supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement. 16. Install a Riverside County super fire hydrant located within 250' of building measured along an approved travel way. A. Exterior surface of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow, and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. B. Curbs shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. 17. Prior to recordation of the final map, the developer shall furnish the original and three (3) copies of the water system plan to the fire marshal for review. 18. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and approved by the water company, with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system in Tract No. 19575 and PP 13-83 is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the fire marshal". Upon approval, the original plan will be returned to the developer. 19. Prior to delivery of combustible materials to the building site, the required water system shall be installed operating and delivering the required flow. 20. No parking allowed in driveway access. Palm Desert Water and Services District: 21. A concrete block wall is shown on the north property line which is coincident in alignment with a 10 - inch steel district water main and encroaches within the five foot easement given for water main service purposes. If a wall is to be built: A. Care must be exercised when excavating for the wall footing so as not to damage the 10 - inch steel water main. B. All costs for damages and/or repair to the main due to construction of the wall shall be borne by the developer. 22. The owner of the property shall execute an agreement that provides that if at any time in the future the water main requires repair, the owner shall pay for all costs related to the repair including the removal and replacement of the wall and any other improvements in the vicinity of the required repair. 23. The district will install a 2-inch water meter at a cost of $2,000.00. 24. A frontage fee of $8.00 per foot will be imposed along San Rafael Avenue. 25. The water service installation charges will be as follows: One 2-inch water meter @ $2,000 $2,000.00 Frontage Fee for 79 feet @ $8.00 $ 632.00 Total 2,6 22.00 26. All fees and meter installation charges must be paid before the installation work will begin. 27. At least one week advance notice should be given. 28. A hydrant exists at the northwest corner of the property. The addition of any new fire hydrants or the relocation of any existing fire hydrants if required by the city fire marshal would be completed at an additional charge to be determined upon request. Coachella Valley Water District: 29. This area shall be annexed to District Nos. 54 and 80 of the Coachella Valley Water District for sanitation service. - - - _. CATAL/NA ----- . _ _... -- - - -- WAY Q APART NT5 736 4 40 34 VAGAN 33 28 W 26J LEGEND O h 4443/ DO HEY TO OWNER /VACANT 44430 44432 VACANT L/5T 44470 23 00/ PARCEL ADDRE55 h 37' VACANT 4d47�o 4447(j 44447 44f76 44472 38 VACANT 35 3/ 30 24 VACANT APARTMENTS VACANT f9500 / VACANT O 44532 f¢Sps F¢6 0 �1 OVACANT O yRss/5 20 [� 9p9�T�F O VACANT T 14 PP600 O /3 P� R � J VACANT VACANT rsa hQ l2 /8 QP VACANT 4't63 3 �P �F /0 /7 VACANT WAY 300 1 RADIL/5 MAPcASE NO 'c"M' NOTED d wrrnorm en on�ww or 7G q , DATE, n[rl6[O ADZ / filed 1JVE5TOR 7/4-773-2/20 8(?0T0WN�60UNTRYRD, ORANGE) CALIF �'4r oftAw'"a NumoW NORTH I`=10' SINGLE FAMILY l \ SINGLE FAMILY (SINGLE 57ORY/ (SINGLf!TORT) 0 q \ LG1 L°OL � /d'wgaa kmE EGP ,E R o W UUC eL m<R wmL G xe! iE�zds.e� lo ~ PAT/J O 7 / I I I UNIT-/ UNIT-P L'NIT-3 UNIT-4 1 I REVERS£ lTINt1IR0 RI VfRSC 9TAN09R0 REVERSE '� I✓O}.161 (./e}.111 � L/DlJy1 Llo}.111 4l0}.101 n // j 1\ Z \ -CONCRET< LO/ 2 n I. }piO y J � [• � \ I TYP/C JL R i ° o 50.0 RO.W_L L� --- — _ �0 r LF f i f .nA50NaY WA(l LISTING ` O I OUPLEY OWLLL/NL yl p (SING[! STWY/ Y � PRJv'ECT 3 TE nm h V.v/T9/Ck 9]G2✓J 5,Slc.'S FL C uVE.lEL 9Y PE RC G El.'a E I LA.VOS=�P/AJ - c PAI: 11 /.PEJ DEVEL07ER5: JLJ./.:°/E>TGG, �y c 5 vL T -H I cCON-RY F J J, ,C111 -RA'J 9:+ N VICINITY MAP NO]I! SITE PLAN 21 i a F NOR7H ELEVATION tooniNc suurn m a n n .- OR NOT E: WE• T ELI bl171, N &11/ 711 LLEVAIRN Icol.Mu b4vl (L.IVN.. ., ulll FI FVAII IN UNIIS 1 4 i i 7i-� - rp, Tilr-l- SOUTH ELEVATION (.>JH/NG NOPTN m 1 I � I �° : I'rI" I IJI L,Ji �I I( I 1-4 I ILi,111,J 11, 11 LJII:J I m EAST ELEVATION SOUIN ELEVATION NOTE: tOOX/Nc WFST LOOXIIIG NOeTM I UNITS�123 4 5 Patin 2ederf Water & Serviced 2iJtrict 44.500 PORTOLA AVENUE BOX 161 PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92261 BOARD OF DIRECTORS: Phone:169)346-6338 ROBERT C. H. LAWMAN,President R. CLAIR MCDONOUGH SHARON K. EPPS October 6 , 1983 PHYLLIS GRIGGS,Secretary ,� ��'\?%; „ ;��,• Mr. Ramon Diaz City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, California 92260 Re : Case No. TT 19575 , PP13-83 Dear Mr. Diaz : In response to your letter regarding the above referenced project , we would like to make the following comments : 1. A concrete block wall is shown on the north property line which is coincident in alignment with a 10-inch steel District water main and encroaches within the 5 foot easement given for water main service purposes . If a wall is to be built : 1) Care must be excercised when excavat- ing for the wall footing so as not to damage the 10-inch steel water main. 2) All costs for damages and/or repair to the main due to con- struction of the wall shall be borne by the developer. 2 . The owner of the property shall execute an agreement that provides that if at any time in the future the water main requires repair, the owner shall pay for all costs related to the repair including the removal and replacement of the wall and any other improvements in the vicinity of the required repair. 3 . The District will install a 2-inch water meter at a cost of $2 ,000. 00 . 4. A frontage fee of $8 . 00 per foot will be imposed along San Rafael Avenue . S. The water service installation charges will be as follows : Mr. Ramon Diaz October 6 , 1983 Page 2 One 2-inch water meter @ $27000 $2 , 000 . 00 Frontage Fee for 79 feet @ $8 . 00 632 . 00 TOTAL 6. All fees and meter installation charges must be paid before the installation work will begin. 7. At least one week advance notice should be given. 8. A hydrant exists at the northwest corner of the property. The addition of any new fire hy- drants or the relocation of any existing , if re- quired by the City Fire Marshall would be com- pleted at an additional charge to be determined upon request. If you have any questions in regard to the above, please do not hesitate to contact us . Very truly yours , Robert Lawman , President Palm Desert Water & Services District RL: RJM:vb INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM City of Palm Desert TO: Department of Environmental Services FROM: Director of Public Works SUBJECT: TT 19575, PP 13-83 (J & J INVESTORS) DATE:October 6, 1983 The following should be considered as conditions of approval : (1) Drainage and signalization fund fees, as required by City ordinance, shall be paid prior to recordation of the final map. (2) Drainage facilities shall be provided per Ordinance No. 218 and the Master Drainage Plan to the specifications of the Director of Public Works. (3) Full half-street public improvements, including traffic safety lighting and sidewalk, shall be installed in accordance with City standards. (4) Improvement plans for water and sewer systems shall be approved by the respec- tive service districts. (5) Complete improvement and grading plans and specifications shall be submitted as required by ordinance to the City Engineer for checking and approval be- fore construction of any improvements is commenced. The subdivider shall submit "as-built" plans prior to acceptance of the subdivision improvements by the City. (6) Additional storm drain construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study by the private engineer. (7) Landscaping maintenance on San Rafael shall be provided by the homeowners association. (8) This property is in the AO Depth 1' Zone as shown on the Flood Insurance Rate Map. A flood hazard report, as required by Ordinance No. 221 (Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance) shall be submitted to the Public Works Depart- ment. The report must be approved by the Flood Review Committee prior to approval of the grading plan. (9) Five-foot right-of-way dedication on San Rafael for a thirty-foot half width residential street: (10) Off-site improvement plans to be approved by the Public Works Department and a surety bond posted to guarantee the off-site improvements prior to the map recording. BARRY cCLELLAN, P.E. OCT - 7 1983 BDM/ms ENVIRONrAENIAL SERVICES CJTY OF PALM DESERT RIVERSIDE COUNTY q`p�i�avK:Ie t FIRE DEPARTMENT a CLUYTY IN COOPERATION WITH THE a CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY = RIVERSIDE DAVID L.FLAKE To �oE FIRE CHIEF C( .<• ' _ 210 WEST SAN JACINTO AVENUE �_ PERRIS,CALIFORNIA 92370 TELEPHONE:(714)6573183 Ramon A. Diaz RANCHO MIRAGE FIRE STATION Director of Environmental Services 70 gpp HIGHWAY 111 City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane �.,, RANCHO MIRAGE, CA 92270 �g1vl��` ?aLh^ Palm Desert, CA 92260 V Of Reference: Tentative Tract No. 19575, PP 13-83 Dear Mr. Diaz, Provide the following fire protection in accordance with the Uniform Fire Code: 1 . .Install a water system capable of delivering 2500 GPM fire flow from any fire hydrant for a two hour duration in addition -to domestic supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement. 2. Install a Riverside County super fire hydrant located within 250' of building measured along an approved travel way. A. Exterior surface of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow, and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. B. Curbs shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. 3. Prior to recordation of the final map, the developer shall furnish the original and three (3) copies of the water system plan to the Fire Marshal for review. 4. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and approved by the water company, with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system in Tract No. 19575, PP 13-83 is in accordance with the require- ments prescribed by the Fire Marshal ." Upon approval , the original plan will be returned to the developer. 5. Prior to delivery of combustible materials to the building site, the required water system shall be installed, operating and delivering the required flow. 6. No parking allowed in driveway access. Very truly yours , DAVID L. FLAKE Fire Chief By, ERIC L. VOGT Fire Marshal dpm cc: Jim Zimmerman CVWD ESTABLISHED IN 1918 AS A PUBLIC AGENCY COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT POST OFFICE BOX 1058 COACHELLA, CALIFORNIA 922U • TELEPHON[x( kW 398-2651 (619) DIRECTORS OFFICERS RAYMOND R.RUMMONDS.PRESIDENT LOWELL 0.WEEKS,GENERAL MANAGER-CHIEF ENGINEER TELLIS CODEKAS,VICE PRESIDENT BERNARDIN E SUTTON,SECRETARY JOHN P.POWELL October 11, 1983 VICTOR B.HARDY,AUDITOR PAUL W.NICHOLS REDWINE AND SHERRILL,ATTORNEYS STEVE D.BUXTON File: 0163.11 0721.1 1983 Department of Environmental Se ,tisE3!r6 Er:TAL ScR+!Ices City of Palm Desert :)4•,Y CF =ALM DESERT Post Office Box 1977 Palm Desert, California 92261 Gentlemen: Subject: Tentative Tract 19575 This area is shown to be subject to shallow flooding and is designated Zone AO, depth 1 foot on Federal Flood Insurance rate maps which are in effect at this time. However, we expect the Federal Flood Insurance rate maps will be revised due to the construction of the Palm Valley Stormwater Channel. The District will furnish sanitation service to this area in accordance with the current regulations of this District. This area shall be annexed to Improvement District Nos. 54 & 80 of Coachella Valley Water District for sanitation service. Yours very truly 91MM�'anager-Chief, L, ell 0. Weeks Gene Engineer CS:dlb cc: Riverside County Department of Public Health 46-209 Oasis Street Indio, California 92201 Attention: Don Park TRUE CONSERVATION USE WATER WISELY A t) 9 , ALB+=G�'s1914> CQ CGn'Jt +ld\I`/ 'S'd r N IiA:. SEF:YlCF3 _ .•.. - �aL*.1 pE:iERT - 0700 CENTRAL AVENUE • RIVERSIDE. CALIFORNIA R. W. RIDDELL Eastern Division Mailing Address: P.O. BOX 2200, RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92516 Distribution Planning Supervisor October 13, 1983 Location of Nearest Gas Main: San Rafael.Ave. adjacent to Proposed Development - City of Palm Desert Post Office Box 1977 Palm Desert, CA 92261 RE: Case No. TT19575, PP 13-83 Gentlemen: This letter is not to be interpreted as a contractual commitment to serve the proposed project; but only as an information service. Its intent is to notify you that the Southern California Gas Company has facilities in the area where the above named project is proposed. Gas service to the project could be pro- vided from an existing main without any significant impact on the environment. The service would be in accordance with the Company's policies and extension rules on file with the California Public utilities Commission at the time con- tractual arrangements are made. The availability of natural gas service, as set forth in this letter, is based upon present conditions of gas supply and regulatory policies. As a public utility, the Southern California Gas Company is under the jurisdiction of the California Public utilities Commission. We can also be affected by actions of federal regulatory agencies. Should these agencies take any action which affects gas supply or the condition under which service is available, gas ser- vice will be provided in accordance with revised conditions. We have developed several programs which are available, upon request, to provide � assistance in selecting the most effective applications of energy conservation techniques for a particular project. If you desire further information on any of our energy conservation programs, please contact our Area Market Services Manager, P. O. Box 6226, San Bernardino, CA 2417, hone (714) 884-9411. R. W. Ridde RWR:mac 1_ 1';. GI,HF � i I SOUTH ELEVATION LOONrrIG Nt.FTN I ' I e`vrlc,� I �i)T.r r rrr I ,Tyr t rrrGp .. ._ _ NOK)N ELEVATION L OONMG sIXiiH ISO � 4rn I'O G nn I'n - .�n r I'n 11 Il 1 .I 4'.i Iuw•nvp-mC �Yl '.4 L F FWPFAlf nv IMPOST FA III WE5T ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION FLO^,k'I AN LOOMING EAST IOCM1rNG WFCT "-' "" " ti 0 SECTION i A LPL s II TYP 2 I a Irl10.G.A/DM � Ie110._G.I_/G_M____ /6 ry )YP ROOF PL ON NOTE; FND. FLR.R�OF PLNS. ELEV G CAR CARPO T n wD \1 1' I �I .F • o. r wP wi 6EI f FIT � 7'� +E, PHONEN / ry MASTEII MASTER �N> KITCHEN WW BEI)k00M BEDROOM� HE f'z" RE VHONE—nT C =a I_ n P a ? ,G BATH I 7„4H; _ ^.l DINING DINING II II n RM < L�! l-J 1 j o i --�,c•NlnMrn v �H REV BAT H2'_3��' "S BA II 2 E/ STD UNIT I UNIT 2 I na n 0 L 16 a ry �HiviL 3'-f 3'i 3:e' iv � I LIVING '° BEDROOM BEDROOM _ - LIVING RM RM 5l, e fDi 11I ; C ,�e _, A I 4 --. O we. 4 Aa0vL- fD EfD - NOTE: z p'4' 5'G• s=a 1 r.i" fyyy - ree'-D"evecoe _ d ,V LIVING AREA PER UNIT 1102.150 L LAN UNITS 2 1 q ! 1 1 1 L,ieosr a I BEDRER °O OOM 2 BEDROOM I I �7 ;4 4f1 KITCHEN MASTER MASTER KITCHEN o ® BEDROOM BEDROOMo LIN ° ` .fAul L J ------ �aOT5 JUNITS j TH I D --� BATII I j LIVING DINING I KITCHEN r RM DINING �l DINING RM RM I i+wosr RM C S o m � � BATH 2 BATI12 d4QD UNIT 3 UNIT 4 I � LIVING BEDROOM 2 BEDROOM 2 N VI RM I i NOTES: •` LIVING AREA PER UNIT 1102.150 FL110G RgPLAN I /S'-o• I Lm II —1 1 1av Ty ' I � 1 A I s I � m � I ca.uu< I NORTN EL EVA7/ON 1 PLc5 9 LOOh ING SOUTN I/I"•l•-O` I TPCCS T TYP ' I B TYP T E FOUNDAT/ON PLAN a, G4ZE90 I/5^al!O^ /f• u /+L eET-/u Ba'acE FDUNDA7/ON PLAN 111 'r TYP I'CIR CIgOORT /Ia/ O L/Nf Of 9TO R/G f_CABrNETS OVER _ _ bLROOF RAf TfRS Ti4ROOF RAFTERS_ A _ m_ -e/L a.c. — c/L•o.c. - - — G� :iUU]N ELEVATION L LC IIIUL NGR N I I o' /I • ''B` I I I2 l I 'o' o=o' L b.L••1'f+ ff ii U 11 /l AUMYER Sr GP TYP � O h a ei15Tu0 wA(L L•O.L. /2 TYPLE I-rN BRac[ I160fY[ OR ICI PLET YP ELEND 8 f B NOOF PLAN EA57 ELEV471ON _ WEST E[EV4770N FL OU/L/'[AN L UORING WE51 %I'•/'O LUOnINC E1cT %I"a l'.L' //I'r l'.O P+B FACIA bD� I 9 )OP PL � I cuRn ag ELEVATION .0 L 110N Via••/!//� _ rq^,/•.L•• �> m 2 PLc5 n iry 1a/IO.G YP/4L Lr4 O.Ilz POST TYP Is ROOF PLAN v NOTE; /Y'a'/"` 4 C L UUEPW EI�EV. 4 CAR CAR OPT AND GAZ B •+NO)ED I. Palm aL edert Water & Serviced 2iJtricf 44-500 PORTOLA AVENUE BOX 161 PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92261 BOARD OF DIRECTORS: Phone:(619)3464LIM ROBERT C. H. LAWMAN, President R. CLAIR MCDONOUGH SHARON K. EPPS October 6 , 1983 PHYLLIS GRIGGS, Secretary Mr. Ramon Diaz B3 City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane �tF", Palm Desert , California 92260 `yc n Gr �n,a• .,<_;,. Re : Case No. TT 19575 , PP13-83 Dear Mr. Diaz : In response to your letter regarding the above referenced project , we would like to make the following comments : 1. A concrete block wall is shown on the north property line which is coincident in alignment with a 10-inch steel District water main and encroaches within the 5 foot easement given for water main service purposes . If a wall is to be built : 1) Care must be excercised when excavat- ing for the wall footing so as not to damage the 10- inch steel water main. 2) All costs for damages and/or repair to the main due to con- struction of the wall shall be borne by the developer. 2 . The owner of the property shall execute an agreement that provides that if at any time in the future the water main requires repair, the owner shall pay for all costs related to the repair including the removal and replacement of the wall and any other improvements in the vicinity of the required repair. 3. The District will install a 2-inch water meter at a cost of $2 , 000. 00. 4. A frontage fee of $8 . 00 per foot will be imposed along San Rafael Avenue . 5. The water service installation charges will be as follows : w• Mr. Ramon Diaz October 6 , 1983 Page 2 One 2-inch water meter @ $2 ,000 $2 ,000 . 00 Frontage Fee for 79 feet @ $8 . 00 632 . 00 TOTAL $2 , 632 . 6 6. All fees and meter installation charges must be paid before the installation work will begin. 7 . At least one' week advance notice should be given. 8 . A hydrant exists at the northwest corner of the property. The addition of any new fire hy- drants or the relocation of any existing , if re- quired by the City Fire Marshall would be com- pleted at an additional charge to be determined upon request . If you have any questions in regard to the above , please do not hesitate to contact us . Very truly yours , Robert Lawman , President Palm Desert Water & Services District RL:RJM:vb INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM City of Palm Desert TO: Department of Environmental Services FROM: Director of Public Works SUBJECT: TT 19575, PP 13-83 (J & J INVESTORS) DATE:October 6, 1983 The following should be considered as conditions of approval : (1) Drainage and signalization fund fees, as required by City ordinance, shall be paid prior to recordation of the final map. (2) Drainage facilities shall be provided per Ordinance No. 218 and the Master Drainage Plan to the specifications of the Director of Public Works. (3) Full half-street public improvements, including traffic safety lighting and sidewalk, shall be installed in accordance with City standards. (4) Improvement plans for water and sewer systems shall be approved by the respec- tive service districts. (5) Complete improvement and grading plans and specifications shall be submitted as required by ordinance to the City Engineer for checking and approval be- fore construction of any improvements is commenced. The subdivider shall submit "as-built" plans prior to acceptance of the subdivision improvements by the City. (6) Additional storm drain construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study by the private engineer. (7) Landscaping maintenance on San Rafael shall be provided by the homeowners association. (8) This property is in the AO Depth 1' Zone as shown on the Flood Insurance Rate Map. A flood hazard report, as required by Ordinance No. 221 (Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance) shall be submitted to the Public Works Depart- ment. The report must be approved by the Flood Review Committee prior to approval of the grading plan. (9) Five-foot right-of-way dedication on San Rafael for a thirty-foot half width residential street: (10) Off-site improvement plans to be approved by the Public Works Department and a surety bond posted to guarantee the off-site improvements prior to the map recording. BARRY`FicCLELLAN, P.E. OCT - 7 1983 BDM/ms ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CITY Of ?ALAI DESERT u+... RIVERSIDE COUNTY q�'�;. Li y FIRE DEPARTMENT ' ' r CDUNTY IN COOPERATION WITH THE 6. „ CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY RIVERSI )1 ..,....� DAVID L. FLAKE fN o f FIRECHIEF „(..r'• 210 WEST SAN JACINTO AVENUE ^� PERRIS,CALIFORNIA 92370 5 t^,�, 5.83 . •,,\,J(„_ TELEPHONE:1714)657.3183 Ramon A. Diaz Director of Environmental Services CL RANCHO MIRAGE FIRE STATION 11 City of Palm Desert RANCHOIMIRAGEGHWAY 1CA92270 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane cs1vlF pF`'��e+ o .>_FT ' Palm Desert, CA 92260 Reference: Tentative Tract No. 19575, PP 13-83 Dear Mr. Diaz, Provide the following fire protection in accordance with the Uniform Fire Code: 1 . .Install a water system capable of delivering 2500 GPM fire flow from any fire hydrant for a two hour duration in addition -to domestic supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement. 2. Install a Riverside County super fire hydrant located within 250' of building measured along an approved travel way. A. Exterior surface of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow, and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. B. Curbs shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. 3. Prior to recordation of the final map, the developer shall furnish the original and three (3) copies of the water system plan to the Fire Marshal for review. 4. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and approved by the water company, with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system in Tract No. 19575, PP 13-83 is in accordance with the require- ments prescribed by the Fire Marshal ." Upon approval , the original plan will be returned to the developer. 5. Prior to delivery of combustible materials to the building site, the required water system shall be installed, operating and delivering the required flow. 6. No parking allowed in driveway access. Very truly yours , DAVID L. FLAKE Fire Chief yc By, ERIC L. VOGT Fire Marshal dpm cc: Jim Zimmerman CVWD ESTABLISHED IN 1918 AS A PUBLIC AGENCY COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT POST OFFICE BOX 1058 COACHELLA, CALIFORNIA 92236 • TELEPHONWR)6) 398-2651 (619) DIRECTORS OFFICERS RAYMOND R.RUMMONDS.PRESIDENT LOWELL0 WEEKS,GENERAL MANAGER-CHIEF ENGINEER TELLIS CODEKAS,VICE PRESIDENT BERNARDINE SUTTON,SECRETARY JOHN P.POWELL October 11, 1983 VICTORS.HARDY,AUDITOR PAUL W.NICHOLS REDWINE AND SHERRILL,ATTORNEYS STEVE D.BUXTON File: 0163. 11 0721.1 c_, _; _ ? 1983 Department of Environmental SerY>ces,,ENTnL SERVICES City of Palm Desert ^tti CF FALM DESERT Post Office Box 1977 Palm Desert, California 92261 Gentlemen: Subject: Tentative Tract 19575 This area is shown to be subject to shallow flooding and is designated Zone AO, depth 1 foot on Federal Flood Insurance rate maps which are in effect at this time. However, we expect the Federal Flood Insurance rate maps will be revised due to the construction of the Palm Valley Stormwater Channel. The District will furnish sanitation service to this area in accordance with the current regulations of this District. This area shall be annexed to Improvement District Nos. 54 & 80 of Coachella Valley Water District for sanitation service. Yours very truly owell 0. Weeks Gene 1 Manager-Chief Engineer CS:dlb cc: Riverside County Department of Public Health 46-209 Oasis Street Indio, California 92201 Attention: Don Park TRUE CONSERVATION USE WATER WISELY U!i�'cRT- 3700 CENTRAL AVENUE a RIVERSIDE. CALIFORNIA R. W. RIDDELL Eastern Division Meiling Address: P.O. BOX 22DO. RIVERSIDE. CALIFORNIA 92516 Distribution Planning Supervisor October 13, 1983 Location of Nearest Gas Main: San Rafael Ave. adjacent to Proposed Development City of Palm DesertI Post Office Box 1977 Palm Desert, CA 92261 RE: Case No. TT19575, PP 13-83 Gentlemen: This letter is not to be interpreted as a contractual commitment to serve the proposed project; but only as an information service. Its intent is to notify you that the Southern California Gas Company has facilities in the area where the above named project is proposed. Gas service to the project could be pro- vided from an existing main without any significant impact on the environment. The service would be in accordance with the Company's policies and extension rules on file with the California Public Utilities Commission at the time con- tractual arrangements are made. The availability of natural gas service, as set forth in this letter, is based upon present conditions of gas supply and regulatory policies. As a public utility, the Southern California Gas Company is under the jurisdiction of the California Public Utilities Commission. We can also be affected by actions of federal regulatory agencies. Should these agencies take any action which affects gas supply or the condition under which service is available, gas ser- vice will be provided in accordance with revised conditions. We have developed several programs which are available, upon request, to provide assistance in selecting the most effective applications of energy conservation techniques for a particular project. If you desire further information on any of our energy conservation programs, please contact our Area Market Services Manager, P. D. Box 6226, San Bernardino, CA 2417, hone (714) 884-9411. R. W. Rid de RWR:mac P° O.1F ')F PUBLICATION C2210 , Z015 . 5 CCD ) PROOF OF PURLICAMN m LEGAL NOTIC ,- PP 1 A " a citizen of thef Unites Mates ani a resident of the County aforesaid ; .1 am over the age of eighteen years, ,and not a party to or .interested in the above entitled matter , 1 am the principal clerk of the printer _ CITY OF PALM DESERT Of THE ilcr _I POP , CITY NOTICE CASE NOS. PP 13-83 and TT a r le%'?sp?OCr Uf gene Pal Circula— - NOTICE 119HEREBV.GIV- tion, printed and DuDlisiled weeklyEN that a public hearing will be held before the Palm Do- the Ci tY Of AVe inside , County serf Planconsider ning reauo bYJ &to ., of i. Version, and Ahich newspaper INVESTORS,forooprovolofa ; Precise plan of design and a has been adjudged a newspaper O f single lot tentative tract map i for condominium purposes to ge n�9r a.l C i r C',2 la t i on by the allow construction of five resi- dentiol condominium units Superior Court of the County o f with associated parking locat- ed on a 22,28a square foot site Riverside , :hate of California on the east side of Son Rafael Avenue,some 270 feet south of under date of CLober 5 , 1954 , Catalina. A.P.N. 627-1C2-g15 Case nVmozr 0 1658 ; Sold public hearing will that the g be held on November a council of-� no t1C 2, Of o-;h LCh Ule Lnn fixed 15 chan P.M. in the cDesert chanter at the Palm Desert i Or! r1L P(; COPY, has Deen published Drive, Hall, 73-5D Fred Waring a Palm Desert, Califof- Ln Btl Ch re pUl ar and entire 155VC oil interested which Persons antlplace allinieresietl persons are in- of said newsp aPer and not in an vited to attend and be heard. Y ar RAMON A. DIAZ Su PPP ement thereof on the secretary f o j 1 C n i ng City of Palm Desert. da Les , CO—'A it : .California POP-11/4 11 /4 ,1983 I Certify ( or declare) under Penal of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated `JOVenler 4 , 1983 at YjVerSidn, California CITY OF PALM DESERT TENTH T/!/E TRA C T AIR? /95 75 - IN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT EEIKG A PROPOSED ONE LOT SUBDIVISION FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES ON 1 0 T N0 . 15. BLOCK 6. - PALMA VILLAGE UNIT NO . 5 . M .B . 20, P6S . 40-41 . RIVERSIDE COUNTY - SEPTEMBER . 1983 O N NER 5 SUBDIVIDER : J A J INVESTORS c]n J.N. EN ART, RI TOWN 6 R W,4TE,4 iN.4ii✓ "I I. ORA NGF. AI IFONS A 92668 0 ENISINEEE '. ENGI 11245Ep O5 Hl ANLANENC HPITE A YLCCA VALLEY, CA ' FORNIA 922R4 I '4 A 1 h� 0w� UTILITY COMPANIES: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ('0. 1�(7 I ✓ /G 7:000 HICHYAY 111 BI; ° -" — / (� PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO. 46323 TOWN AVENUE P _ -_ �- - INDIO. CALIFORNIA 92201 yJy. '6 'J \'D -- O ✓ ��i \ COACNELLA IALLE I T.P. 741]9 EI PASEO P.O. BOX 9bR i PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 42260 In V` ) �O]S2 PALM DESERT WATER DEPARTMENT P.O. BOX 16l `'"��'_^ . �201.5� ,� i '✓ PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 9226u- p .l°O�O / SL .ry ��r.,A:`:A J,] yY �. / GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. V i �{ c ]3E g •`L .'� 82901 BLISS STR F.EI IINIO, CALIFORNIA 92201 O NOTES: °ypp /p.f 1) APPROXIMATE ACREAGE: 0.51 ACRES NET 2) EXISTING (AND PROPOSED) LAND USES: NORTH RESDENTAL oe eq NV �` SOUTH: RESIDENTIAL "A N EAST: VACANT (RESIDENTIAL) N WEST: RESIDENTIAL cIR ✓o pule 9) SOURCE OF WATER SUPPLY: PALM DESERT WATER DEPARTMENT nAL� 4) METHOD OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL: SEPTIC TANK AND SEEPAGE PITS I 5) EXISTING AND PROPOSED ZONING: R-2 $TILE wY Q l�/C/.V/TY MAP 11111 i1 ccw-�i• ■1/1/1/1■ i/■1/1■1////11//11 � s■ ��••_•• ME ! 1�1/1///1/�I//11/■1/■//!//t/I � � s ��s� s Elms !■!■■!■■! lh... 1�11111111 -111111111�11111111 � �,�\\\�'o ' i 111111111111111��■ ��c��' FA%af fig ��NII Vallimail IwAfflow 1111■ ■111��111111111111 1111111 ��po �Illllllltltitltlillll �®I��Ilalllil ' i o•�aan. a..cr inrm 1 � IIII® !�� ! � ;i�tttiiltlit� ■ittlllittttith I l IIIII � I�IIIIIIIiII/ �lillillllllltl � !SEEN ®� RIVERSIDE COUNTY la�1�6 1.51 C I, b FIRE DEPARTMENT e d� ,or IN COOPERATION WITH THE C NTY CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY e 1� RIVERSIDE YAM./III p DAVID L.FLAKE �FMr of f° FIRE CHIEF ter,,�', 210 WEST SAN JACINTO AVENUE n,• ' PERRIS,CALIFORNIA 92370 a3...,; �,"�s TELEPHONE:(714)657.3183 i Ramon A. Diaz RANCHO MIRAGE FIRE STATION Director of Environmental Services • T City of Palm Desert �. , s� j�j 70-800 HIGHWAY 111 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane ENV I°v4`?�Lpn D RANCHO MIRAGE, CA92270 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Reference: Tentative Tract No. 19575, PP 13-83 Dear Mr. Diaz, Provide the following fire protection in accordance with the Uniform Fire Code: 1 . Install a water system capable of delivering 2500 GPM fire flow from any fire hydrant for a two hour duration in addition -to domestic supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured. at the time of measurement. 2. Install a Riverside County super fire hydrant located within 250' of building measured along an approved travel way. A. Exterior surface of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow, and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. B. Curbs shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. 3. Prior to recordation of the final map, the developer shall furnish the original and three (3) copies of the water system plan to the Fire Marshal for review. 4. - The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and approved by the water company, with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system in Tract No. 19575, PP 13-83 is in accordance with the require- ments prescribed by the Fire Marshal ." Upon approval , the original plan will be returned to the developer. 5. Prior to delivery of combustible materials to the building site, the required water system shall be installed, operating and delivering the required flow. 6. No parking allowed in driveway access. Very truly yours , DAVID L. FLAKE Fire Chief By, ERIC L. VOGT Fire Marshal dpm cc: Jlm Zimmerman CVWD --i'll CA L197-CRNIA cam COMPANY 3700 CENTRAL AVENUE • RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA R. W. RIDDELL Eastern Division Mailing Address: P.O. BOX 2200, RIVERSIDE. CALIFORNIA 92516 Distribution Planning Supervisor October 13, 1983 Location of Nearest Gas Main: San Rafael Ave. adjacent to Proposed Development City of Palm Desert Post Office Box 1977 Palm Desert, CA 92261 RE: Case No. TT19575, PP 13-83 Gentlemen: This letter is not to be interpreted as a contractual commitment to serve the proposed project; but only as an information service. Its intent is to notify you that the Southern California Gas Company has facilities in the area where the above named project is proposed. Gas service to the project could be pro- vided from an existing main without any significant impact on the environment. The service would be in accordance with the Company's policies and extension rules on file with the California Public Utilities Commission at the time con- tractual arrangements are made. The availability of natural gas service, as set forth in this letter, is based upon present conditions of gas supply and regulatory policies. As a public utility, the Southern California Gas Company is under the jurisdiction of the California Public Utilities Commission. We can also be affected by actions of federal regulatory agencies. Should these agencies take any action which affects gas supply or the condition under which service is available, gas ser- vice will be provided in accordance with revised conditions. We have developed several programs which are available, upon request, to provide assistance in selecting the most effective applications of energy conservation techniques for a particular project. If you desire further information on any of our energy conservation programs, please contact our Area Market Services Manager, P. O. Box 6226, San Bernardino, CA 2417, hone (714) 884-9411. R. W. Ridde RWR:mac l INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM City of Palm Desert TO: Department of Environmental Services FROM: Director of Public Works SUBJECT: TT 19575, PP 13-83 (J & J INVESTORS) DATE:October 6, 1983 The following should be considered as conditions of approval : (1) Drainage and signalization fund fees, as required by City ordinance, shall be paid prior to recordation of the final map. (2) Drainage facilities shall be provided per Ordinance No. 218 and the Master Drainage Plan to the specifications of the Director of Public Works. (3) Full half-street public improvements, including traffic safety lighting and sidewalk, shall be installed in accordance with City standards. (4) Improvement plans for water and sewer systems shall be approved by the respec- tive service districts. (5) Complete improvement and grading plans and specifications shall be submitted as required by ordinance to the City. Engineer for checking and approval be- fore construction of any improvements is commenced. The subdivider shall submit "as-built" plans prior to acceptance of the subdivision improvements by the City. (6) Additional storm drain construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study by the private engineer. (7) Landscaping maintenance on San Rafael shall be provided by the homeowners association. (8) This property is in the AO Depth 1' Zone as shown on the Flood Insurance Rate Map. A flood hazard report, as required by Ordinance No. 221 (Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance) shall be submitted to the Public Works Depart- ment. The report must be approved by the Flood Review Committee prior to approval of the grading plan. (9) Five-foot right-of-way dedication on San Rafael for a thirty-foot half width residential street: (10) Off-site improvement plans to be approved by the Public Works Department and a surety bond posted to guarantee the off-site improvements prior to the map recording. BARRY 4 cCLELLAN, P.E. OCT ' 7 1983 BDM/ms ENVIRONP.^.EN'AL SERVICES !;; c OF RALVI CESERT Patin ebedert Water & Serviced ebbtrict 44.500 PORTOLA AVENUE BOX 161 PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92261 BOARD OF DIRECTORS: Phone:(61.9)346-6338 ROBERT C. H. LAWMAN, President R. CLAIR MCDONOUGH SHARON K. EPPS October 6 , 1983 PHYLLIS GRIGGS, Secretary \?J. p Mr. Ramon Diaz City of Palm Desert 198.3 45- 275 Prickly Pear Lane L �t� Palm Desert, California 92260 ENVIN(J"i Ci U Re : Case No. TT 19S7S , PP13-83 Dear Mr. Diaz : In response to your letter regarding the above referenced project , we would like to make the following comments : 1. A concrete block wall is shown on the north property line which is coincident in alignment with a 10-inch steel District water main and encroaches within the S foot easement given for water main service purposes . If a wall is to be built : 1) Care must be excercised when excavat- ing for the wall footing so as not to damage the 10-inch steel water main. 2) All costs for damages and/or repair to the main due to con- struction of the wall shall be borne by the developer. 2 . The owner of the property shall execute an agreement that provides that if at any time in the future the water main requires repair, the owner shall pay for all costs related to the repair including the removal and replacement of the wall and any other improvements in the vicinity of the required repair. 3. The District will install a 2-inch water meter at a cost of $2 , 000 . 00 . 4 . A frontage fee of $8 . 00 per foot will be imposed along San Rafael Avenue. S . The water service installation charges will be as follows : Mr. Ramon Diaz October 6 , 1983 Page 2 One 2-inch water meter @ $2 ,000 $2 , 000 . 00 Frontage Fee for 79 feet @ $8 . 00 632 . 00 TOTAL 3 . 00 6. All fees and meter installation charges must be paid before the installation work will begin. 7. At least one week advance notice should be given. 8. A hydrant exists at the northwest corner of the property. The addition of any new fire hy- drants or the relocation of any existing , if re- quired by the City Fire Marshall would be com- pleted at an additional charge to be determined upon request. If you have any questions in regard to the above, please do not hesitate to contact us . Very truly yours , Robert Lawman , President Palm Desert Water $ Services District RL:RJM:vb ESTABLISHED IN 1918 AS A PUBLIC AGENCY COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT POST OFFICE BOX 1058 • COACHELLA, CALIFORNIA 92236 • TSLEPHONC 1R*) 398-2651 (619) DIRECTORS - OFFICERS RAYMOND R.RUMMONDS,PRESIDENT LOW ELL 0.WEEKS,GENERAL MANAGER-CHIEF ENGINEER TELLIS CODEKAS,VICE PRESIDENT BERNARDINE SUTTON.SECRETARY JOHN P.POWELL October 11, 1983 VICTOR B.HARDY,AUDITOR PAUL W.NICHOLS REDWINE AND SHERRILL,ATTORNEYS STEVE O.BUXTON File: 0163.11 0721.1 771 1983 Department of Environmental SerVd.IGe51AENTAL SERVICES City of Palm Desert ^;TY CIF FALN-i DESERT Post Office Box 1977 Palm Desert, California 92261 Gentlemen: Subject: Tentative Tract 19575 This area is shown to be subject to shallow flooding and is designated Zone AO, depth 1 foot on Federal Flood Insurance rate maps which are in effect at this time. However, we expect the Federal Flood Insurance rate maps will be revised due to the construction of the Palm Valley Stormwater Channel. The District will furnish sanitation service to this area in accordance with the current regulations of this District. This area shall be annexed to Improvement District Nos. 54 & 80 of Coachella Valley Water District for sanitation service. Yours very truly J � . 0 owell 0. Weeks Gene 1 Manager-Chief Engineer CS:dlb cc: Riverside County Department of Public Health 46-209 Oasis Street Indio, California 92201 Attention: Don Park TRUE CONSERVATION USE WATER WISELY POST OFFICE BOX 1977, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92261 TELEPHONE(619)346-0611 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO: TT 19575, PP 13-83 APPLICANT: J & J INVESTORS Enclosed please find materials describing a project for which the following is being requested: Approval of a precise plan, tentative tract map and negative declaration of environmental impact to allow a five unit condominium project on the east side of San Rafael, 200 feet south of Catalina, more particularly described as APN 627-142-001 The attached data was prepared by the applicant and is being forwarded to you for comments and recommended conditions of approval. The city is interested in the probable impacts on the natural environment (e.g. water and air pollution) public resources (e.g. demand for schools, hospitals, parks, power generation, sewage treatment, etc.) and site/building plan acceptability. Your comments and recommended conditions of approval must be received by this office prior to 5:00 p.m., October 6, 1983, in order to be discussed by the land division committee at their meeting of October 7, 1983. The land division committee (comprised of director of environmental services, city building official, city engineer, fire marshal and a representative of CVWD) will discuss the comments and recommended conditions of approval and will forward them to the planning commission through the staff report. Any information received by this office after the receipt deadline will not be discussed by the land division committee nor will it be forwarded to the planning commission for consideration. Sin e , RAMON 4A�. IAZ DIRECTF VIRONMENTAL SERVICES RD/lr PLEASE RETURN MAP WITH COMMENTS — - - - WAY --- -- -- --------- - CATAL/NA - RAPART N75 73Io0 9 40 VACANT 27 34 u,O 26 L_EGEN� 33 28 � t O � O O h 4443/ DO KEY TO OWNER m 44430 44432 � VACANT 4 3!o VACANT L/ST 2 23 4447o 37 32 29 . Q 25 00/ PARCEL ADDRE55 VACANT 44476 44476 44447 4447rc 44472' 38, VACANT 35 30 , 29 22J VACANT APARTMENTS VACANT 44500 / /6 2I ' VACANT O 44532 445"OS 'y'v o � O VACANT sR l5 ZO O 9p9�T�F O VACANT " 14 1'Ts ADO yy\ gy O s S3\ 5 600 /3 /9 \ VACANT q VACANT Also \ yaJ 6 I2 /B QP i \ pv VACANTMEAN S y II Oy VACANT /SCALE:/'=/00' JAY 3001 RADIUS MAP Sgy2 CA5E NO NOTED ♦neovao erg onaww ev�G p�Z / LIeJ INVE5TOR 714- 773-2/20 890 TOWN�COUNTRYRD, ORANCE, CALIF �4r �j OMWIXO MUMe[R NORTH I'-10• S/NLLE FAMILY l \ S/NLLE FAMILY I (3INCLE STORY) I (s/ucLf JrORY) x ? b I �ILr W[TFN 1(/NC CO IA! c<uc eL 1cR wut e ne9a3W[LE 2ft9a j I ' wl c < i I I •e 1 p CA r I I { - - W UN/T-/ I UNlE L•N/T8 NU IT"1VeRS ,,02.,6E 1,02, 0 I voV.,5E Tr[uGA/O 1 ".2." r •j O � .l,/O}.161 I (/01.16[ I LIOSJI[ 1 (/Or./1I I > o°I z ccI PoOL TYPKJL p .� � / .• y rocs 500'R O,W�i/ 1` 0 I I` /Nc" : Q • ; /o�o' � nJwHer lvAtt(t[vnNG) \ \e a O I OI e .LLINL y (9LLE$r./Y) J PRO✓!CT SITE oU II oZ F --7 LEGEND II•�`—/// SITE "E2I 34.FT. b m K COVE E" 1TO.2Y) f,.9F.TS r FT. N, H.Y< FYI• x �OVERET,PARHING ;9c- $4.F). sue. •, 'n TRUCT%COVE BY STRUCTURERE S 99._5PEICE '/e LANDS-TALE _ - 'losA FAR $NC O REU1/RE •J 4 PRC DEVELOPERS: ✓t✓-INVI55TG6'> sco 1-114 C'.1v A'v "JuvLRn'A 9:.1n VICINITY MAP NO 1CA:r - t<. 1. SITE PLAN � ,n 2� S; 4 - - --=- -- 7 IE Ell 00 SOUTH ELEVATION [OOHING NQPTN E. i 1 i a �It4-mil -1 .:..•:.:.. .:.: .. .....—_.__ _ EAST ELEVATION 50U7N ELEVATION NOTE: [OOH.NG W65T GOOHINL NOa IN I N UNIT 1234 _,..I[..Ln ... 45-275 PRIMLY PEAR LANE. PALM DESERT;CAUFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 MAFaM?r OF BUILDING &. SAFETY PRELIICMM REVI i OF PLANS THIS IS NOT A PLAN CHECKI. r�vaoPrr=: 7 T PP 11 -83 cQ�rrrs: . BUM ANY FO MMR.COl MMS CAN BE MADE, AM=MNAI. IlMyRMATION IS t�QJED FDR.REV43P:... CMIPL= AMUMCtURAL DRAWWIlCS AND SPECIFICATIONS �- CZE STii[JCT[]RAL D WMM AND CALCULATIONS Q' CCiO= H.V.A.C., F7.F.=CAL AND PUxMM PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS cmin= TITLE. 24 wERGY. ODNSERVATION DOCCIN1HNmmm Q COTEL= GRADING PLANS OTm 9- z9 e3 JO�:'P4aMU, SR. DATE .DZRgtTOR OF BUILDING & SAFETY Cutfaz- off Zna POST OFFICE BOX 1977, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92261 TELEPHONE(619)346-0611 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO: TT 19575, PP 13-83 APPLICANT: J & J INVESTORS Enclosed please find materials describing a project for which the following is being requested: Approval of a precise plan, tentative tract map and negative declaration of environmental impact to allow a five unit condominium project on the east side of San Rafael, 200 feet south of Catalina, more particularly described as APN 627-142-001 The attached data was prepared by the applicant and is being forwarded to you for comments and recommended conditions of approval. The city is interested in the probable impacts on the natural environment (e.g. water and air pollution) public resources (e.g. demand for schools, hospitals, parks, power generation, sewage treatment, etc.) and site/building plan acceptability. Your comments and recommended conditions of approval must be received by this office prior to 5:00 p.m., October 6, 1983, in order to be discussed by the land division committee at their meeting of October 7, 1983. The land division committee (comprised of director of environmental services, city building official, city engineer, fire marshal and a representative of CVWD) will discuss the comments and recommended conditions of approval and will forward them to the planning commission through the staff report. Any information received by this office after the receipt deadline will not be discussed by the land division committee nor will it be forwarded to the planning commission for consideration. A AZ DIRECTOR OF VIRONMENTAL SERVICES RD/lr PLEASE RETURN MAP WITH COMMENTS 1 4 3 3 2 o _ ..' .. mo NORTH ELEVATION eoonrNc sours flip V Z I I'.CS11:1?I N WEST ELEVA77GN NCR7"N ELEVAT/ON_ LLUhING E4•v'I [ULn'/N4 iOU]{I ./. 4 NORTH I:'=10' 5/NCL£FAMILY) l \ SINGLE FAMILY sroar 1 SINGLE E sroay) 9.0 60.o 180 / 14 ',pii ST.Lp' I p.0 F W { a IG"WATER /NEB /2 e14 g ' - 114 Y� W CH_W4LL- ° 1 I C[ CBL _ N6944 2B5 _ 'r —TP4TlO 7 I I / UNIT-1 UNIT-2 GrNIT-3 I � O A'p" JR,IEO .l6S4c .GST/.f NOARO R£/ERSE RD URENVIE.TR-S5 S'All RK oz.I51 6 0 / to to I I \ I o yp / POOL O O I TYPICAL /g i l 0' 3 •O c l � P 54 Sry o-'- RI. 00 Nv sP4 ��kV 1' 500'R O.W. M100 ti 1`Y fi 222. 0 Rpl U fiE 33 I - ___ 5 _ a 3 /O�O� � � MASONRY WALL(EXISTINLJ I\ C l I W �. 8.0 a0.p m.o i o TRLp� O � O(/PLEX OWEL</NG W p (5/NGLE STORY) Z PROJECT SITE LEGEND SIT- f{Eel 54.FL hy� h vN/TS/ONE STORY/ 'p,510.765SFE µ LOVEREU PARK/Nc 1,90" 3G.FT. %GOVEREC 3Y - 5TRHCTLI"4E5 33._5 PERC EN'TACE LAN05C FllN PARKIIVO REQOIREO !O ZKWN PHC//DEO �3 ' DEVELORERS: J6J./:VVE9TGRE s+o o.ea..- CccvN�A ..z,=,14LrFORNrA so.,es 'mac n1-e]a-.!zo �N9 9 VICINITY MAP no scALE I SITE PLAN �I 41 2� @ N'P I J I GEI T c GfLR.v: All C l 'B Q PHONE "T iv\ A' i KITCHEN ,v' MASTEk MASTER \ L N. KITCHEN 1 o W _ BEDROOM BEDROOM � w ,� \ LEA PHONE O u I�•m J L �yl.Nl w<e.q Z BATH I O i O I�A H W,.. G DINING DINRMING. c OF INTv BATH 21 F BA II 2 Ol RAL STI) UNIT „ _- O .,..L ^-I- UNIT 2 I a ,v LIVING '" BEDROOM 2 BEDROOM 2 LIVING RM RM yA 0 0° p p LINE of mrZ1 O I LP0�1 004 ^� A a:,` Ir=-sr!_ NOTE: IAR�p'OVLPAIL A ° • n LIVING AREA PER UNIT 1102.150 L I LA UNITS 2 c o' yI O $ D -d,.avosr ' BEDROOM 2 ER BEDROOM Q 00 00 _ wP 6� R 0 0 KITCHEN MASTER MASTER KITCHEN m m p BEDROOM BEDROOM o LIN ITS UN Mz D z JLIVING DINING KITCHEN R DINING L ATH I BATH I DINING RM RM -4+4105T RM ® 0 0 J® RM 0 C J O -=m BATH2 BATH21 27n �s UNIT 3 UNIT 4 �.5„ 1 e,./„ e,/• �_ m I jj RIMING BEDROOM 2 BEDROOM 2 LIVING RM A NOTES: ill LIVING AREA PER UNIT 1102.150 FLOOD gPLSAN rov A l I I/FC YI ca uuE `31 SOaTN ELEVATION `mod- LOOHING NGRTH _ V 9 TYP �•)PLCS_ n 4 TrP Li w U lx6L[r-lN aa�ce FOONOAT/ONPLGA/ • TYP n -i —_ _ _ l00�0 ___ i_ CvRP LINF OF_c TM'1GGCAB/NET50✓EF/J NOOM79 EoLEVATION O HANG (/TH - 5•U 1 T PIllPll STOPS TYF aO -- - 2r4 STUDW[rLL LGLET-INBRACE rry IA POsr EFl.ENO i WEST ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION FLOOR PLAN 'GOONING EAST -11O111G WEST 9 TOP ILL .J F ' C(/R0 ry 2 SECTION -�1 �o _ - TYP 3 4vl4 D.Fl4/bM _ 4rHD.i. IBM 4r14DF 18M J � -lO TPLCS \ TYP /5 ROOF PLAN NOTE: FND. FLR.ROOF PLNS. ELEV G CAR CARPORT ...,./ ./.a. ...e..... _.... 4Ob" %I 6YL Tor•Pt- - A llp CURBF : -LR.LmE a _O I O 1 NORTN ELEVATION � - � T -9PLC5 'l LGpNINL 50(/TH r/q'rl-O° '2PLC5 T / 9 TYP f E _ ]O� P PL - I FOUNDATION PLAN U °• AZEG>o 3/e"=rto" �Iz" c" /x L LEr-lN Pseace FOAIC-A T/ON PLAN TYP ,f TYP q-CAR CARPORT /l+/'O OO q _CUR6 l I UNE OF STO.C'AGf CAb/NE]S OVER_ __ �1 N ROOFRAFTe 1xLROOFRAFTERS A 0 0 0 mil 5OUTPELEVMON — [OOK/NG NORTM /2 /2 I2"i 4 5'6" I!o" 6�0" ,'c" G'O" 4!O° _ p q-�� m — �q �� mxcx9Lo W _ YI /I bumPER s/oP TYP p O h — O 1 r15TJO WgGL /P T/6P LET/N BRACE q.[60F"1110R MPOST TYP " ND � B ROOF PLAN EAST ELEVATION WEST ELEV4T/ON FLOG/d rLAN 71 2x5 FACIA bP l .11P PG_. i m /b y V ! ` CURB_ Li ELE VATLON _ o . r/peso^ — to zPGes u I TYP T/ Y!PIC4L L a L O.GY2 YGST TYP /b ROOF PLAN w NOTE. // °' FND.FLR.ROOF PLNS. E�EV. - 4 CAR CARPOPT AND 6AZ B ......N ...O. e...... W 3 S F SOUTH ELEVATION GOOHING NORTH � Nil 77 FFE W 2 n � F EA5T ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION NOTE. L OOH/NG WEST LOONINC NORTH U N ITS/1224 5 WARNER ENGIN- 'ING JOB T S IrIUn ��e5 u�.v. S <, P 7245 Joshua Lane Quite A SHEET NO. — OF YUCCA VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92284 -I 241 (619) 365.7638 CALCULATED BY DATE CHECKED BY DATE____ SCALE PrELIMIrJAP l DPanIA0E S7uoy Foy TT V)5TS PALM 0EsEP7" ReFe� acFs -Asry ill Tots srUDY �ZAlI!IIO /�11f(Argk. ' ]Y2 M14. 0,S,(,,.5, j It�BI; vefUASOAI Q\UFR--jt)t eouwTY ri voo CoOTAL. HYOP61.00V MAPOAL j. .. A�wUM.PI IOA! S — . i�*IM S'fWlq(lS Nowt FAt.c PAT-A IS .A'GGEPT473LE S C-5 SOIL 7VoE A' UP<70� FpM PF)A lAEjf E It�TG`RC�PTEI� EVE STPE6T5' A9MYS►s (NIDello 1, 71)C A006PITY Or , 7PF- IDPAiLIAor, SiM0 (,?F INT9PCEPTEL) A,Io GOAfD��(, �r'O -M . <;PI .PArAE4 A OK TLE rl0wS , 1l6Wt5vcr, )OIt gC 66o6C' 'TRATF.0 OA ADSACC,Tr Ann 0""IS-rrCAAA ( — efbo*r- Ail A,or ,ovA. r, 4AcAivI% 7p GpktviFq Tyr ; 'DPAWAta!~ T6 SA4A J?AFACL 2 ' AC�>J - QrrC<,Ir T('A,,jp, 191(,tl+S ~ RANCHO MI 3F QUADRANGLE CALIFORNIA—RIVERSIDE CO. 7.5 MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC) NW/4 PALM DFSFRI Ip' OIIAORANCILF +� 2R RPE _ RfiF n •�� 1 4fiO nO7 rut'1-•Lr 1."•♦.♦ �,�i••• c :'.�:•_:.. 1 II I Illi '.... . _ .•._ -- - L_ i LAW i O��♦��♦♦ i=..iY...::I�ll� II II W. it'� ,�Y,a :4�i . '4 C�♦:� .1.,:, :[:.III IIII �I I, /. � ::y�([: u ra�aalr�ro ';! 8ll ', � 'Jr I jar H =�' ::::NlO:.::::�_ - I ..I r.....•r W II I i'. ' � 4 eta,. � �rry, x. I •• ;;i�9��::: . . •I, �r �I �T C I+il '�'. ' ':. • ••.'•�t jlMl n. 1•� ,-♦ 6JI ill•♦-i I/ ../�[� �" _ _ ��y ��. ( S.Y': `i •♦ • .- ♦ rfi. -O• 1• III 1.IHII'R `.:\•;. l ::\o .i. ; ;r'i;,;� ;.... ---•---.•;�• F r • ? •d.. \� \•i • .I iI b Ir( i •1 � .1 y L:nl,•r�I(� �IIr rnr •,�n\\\ .. .+ A•-1,•r--••�r -•Y � � �� II Well fo �, _ . S-.v�i w•�_l. pill fir S1r�/ �W i��••�� ' � ��iili ��1 Ili .,. \\� .I, .._V _i ., ...• _ ., rot... wr Gr -.Ilws- wOeo :::. /1, S I '"°�\I _ ea?50 1 ♦ . o-1 arr :" 't" FLIP. It ��r�� " .,� ,;�'�I ,,,.,1 �a�'+ � ;�-;'.�':•N,.�t►'a;'��aIG I14• ,^ DRAII+IA6E r , 1�1 AREA = 1 � o II° �I � ' � �.Il I ,,:. a �. .'r 'rn `1�2`�'� 11��/' � I(fC� �iw � r11r�' '\;•"1�'�r .� � " '�� IL�.� ;f"Jl�x,llll.►��y,!14.�• r: 2e) �l ^L . �aa:1 . w p � . . �I '�� .• (�i�. yr tl "it ' �ii pll I r � �nl 1 y d•:i�e• �� nw vrfl i ', I°\ \I1 '•�IF ll�)11I�I ��r III �V +111j il, . r��, � '�� .Yq'•. __: ��I P �,rt r 1) J�0"�flr\lil Pr\ . I �{ � ��-5'.�A�•%/ y.:p � •� • •�� I � 2� it �� 42'3n„ .. 25 I}� ' ,� ��r �. l,l �I1 �I I � �2 ' .II•,np. l ��]\ � +,( � I•' Wet C2:. ... •I ' 1 I I„I•� 1 '� r. IIa.,N. sl", ,:`111,,' .G� .1 I C RO • �.�.5: :. -� .�.. i � . JIB f r vm ,� r ..: . r 'l ` �IryryIIII'I'I11 ..I •: '� I . ....... ...... I'll / ' tl � re Tel LIMITATIONS: L 100 1. Maximum lenpfh = 1000' Tc 1000 90 2. Maximum area 10 Aeree 5 900 00 i 800 70 ��JQppp 6 Y w •00 700 60 S s 200 7 -- c N 100 E 600 so 9 9 g � Y 0 40_„ T to a fl) I I LL e 400 so f n 0Good Cover g 350 25 llnAewlepe c 1.0 Fair Cover 14 ° 8 E w 5 300 UndaeMper 0 ;2 ,2v is � c e 20 Poor Cewr _E ,2 /y 16 a 250 u 16 Single Family 50 17 c J ~ 16 (1/4 Acre1 16 15 _ g a 14 C( E 20 ` 200 13 12 11 o c 25 E ° KEY 60 9 L-H Te-K-Te' u 30 fl %AM iE 7 (1) L■550', .H25.0, K=Single Family(1/4Ae.) 35 De-felo"mont I Tt a 12.6 min. 6 100 (2) L=550', H =5.69 K• Commercial 40 0mlepment , Tc= 9.7 Tin. s 4 Reference:SlbIl"rophy Item No. 35. R C F C A w C D TIME OF CONCENTRATION . HYDROLOGY MANUAL FOR INITIAL SUBAREA PLATE D-3 • ¢ I o n P n +n P ..1 o N n N n N p n N O 1 o n P N n N o n ♦ ' o• n •N o< a N 1 n N N +o o P P o h++ N N• • • n N N n•w O V o P P oW I .•• nnnnN NNNNN NNNNr rrrrr rr•nr.• •nr rn.•r .n••w W O � P O • J ¢ 1 r P+ P N N P P N r n 1 1 N 1 n O+n O 1 N 1 N�-•O N N O 1 O J Q O+ OINOP •nhON• • • • • • • • • •N• • •n nNN.••-• w111P PPOOh hhhOa • ♦ r W > • NNNNr ..•rrrr w..•r rw r.•.•ww wrrw • • • • • • • • • • • • WW .Ni Q �N Q W W' .• N+n N P �r H w H N�n 1► N•+e N +O O NON O N o N o N N • •_ .• .• rrw NNNNN nnnn ♦•NN+ +hh00 Yr I+h +• n n N r o o i h a+ N• •n n OY ^W • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • rr •-rr.•r•Z • ++N N• ♦•+n n n n n n n n N M N N N N N N N N^••• N , e Q n N W Q n1ON.. nlnn nN1.••/� !l+N+ p P • O na •+N y1 ONN Q W +W N 1 1 N e 1 1 N•n N r 1 1 P 1 h h 1 N ♦ 1 n n n N r w 1 O P P P P 1 w • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • /y N • ♦nnnn NNNNN NNNNr -^rwr r.•w wr .+..•..•wr 4- • J W W J O N a ^ • W •L. • ? N 1 n 1 P r^y n♦ j=n 1 P ♦ +1 N n n ♦ ;MA AA n 1 ++ N e N o N O N e N N �/ •N N+ +h h 0 0 V! I t W y, l ^P•+11 111 ONNPn O• N1 O•PN.+ nP..No Nrn •.• ` O• •h N N r. !+1 N♦ ♦n N r r 1 P S 1 h n+N N N ♦n n N N w O O O V Y r y • • • • • • w w^ i > ♦nnnn NNNNN NNNNN M.••w.+r Z3' rrrrr 1 s O y ¢ n n 1!n +n P N.p O N o a N P N+N n o+n r 1 N o ♦ w 1 ry p n „ Io • ^y M N n^1 O O h h a +N M• ♦ n n M N.. ..1 1 1 O P O O O M n h a a V • NNNNN ----- rrr.•r rr-•rr ----- • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Q W •• N 1 n 1 P r=n• ^h+P 1 N 1 +O N• a O O N o O N p N o N N //1 = wr rw -•-•^ NNNNN nnnnn ♦ •NNN+ VL OI LW r Z f 1 N f •► M ..... .. ..n N 1+ ^N n � w 1 - 1 N l ♦n e e• n+1 N• n M •1 P !O n+ a N O n n N .+O • • > • N • •n n n n n n M N NNN M N M N N w ••r r r•• •-r;; � .n•-r rrrrr U¢ N y` P N J I � lynn + n lNrr+ rn+P ! onn eon roNn `r. Q • 1•N n N r 1 S 1 1 n n+ •M 1 n n N N N r r P!a a O•h h J • r N • • J 1 MnNNN NNMN-• r.-w r•r r•.•w rr r•.•• .r rw • • • • • • • • U p • W Q .•I OM ¢ •W-.U y I ^• N 1 n 1 P r a y• n 1 M 1+1 O N 1 O O O NON O N ONO N N ZQ• �J w r w r N N N N N n n n n n ••N N 1 1 n n C i /Q/ Y^ Q 1 n M:1 N O 1 N 1 n•- �♦ h N n n O p N a O N�n n e O• •O n N �S I h 1 N•n N N 1 1.1 0 h++N N ♦1 n N N .-•O o O 1 .n• ••MnM nYMNN MMNNN NM wrr .+rwww ----- r r ..•r W w O � n O N W t � n ..1 n 1 r •n e 1 0 1!1 1♦ O•Y n O n P • + n O O N n O 4 r y N n N e S e•h 1 N N 1 •♦ n N N r r .-.O e O P P 1 1 C n n n 1 a O J P NMNNM ww.-••w ww.•ww r.yr r..• w.nww • . . • • • • • N J • N 1 n 1• +-N n• N=n 1► 1 N• 1 o N 1 +o N e n e N e N o N M r r w w w r r r r N NNN N n n n n n 1•N N 1 +h h 0 0 •1 R C F C s w C D STANDARD HYDROLOGY MANUAL INTENSITY - DURATION CURVES DATA PLATE D-4.1 (4 of 6) r 0O4V J[� pQL� iI DCSEG _ FORM a®,10 45 273 PrOokOy Pear Lanoy PsOmm DD®a®Ptt, Ca.922 0 SUBDIVISION MAP QPPOYOC ATOON FORM: department ®4 ®mroBlronmmenttaU ssrAcss a POsmlmlOng dIV060on a J & J Investors . c/o J.N. Ewart, Jr. Applicant (please print) 890 Town & Country Road (714) 973-2120 Moiling Address Telephone Orange, California 92668 City State Zip-Code REQUEST: (Describe specific nature of approval requested I. One lot subdivision for condominium purposes. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Lot 15, Block 6, Palma Village Unit No. 5, M .B. 20/40-41 . ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 627-142-001 EXISTING ZONING R-2 Property Owner Authorization The undersigned states that t are the owner(s) of the properly described herein and hereby give author- izatlo theOf nq of application. 9/23/83 idnaturo Date Agreement absolving the City of Palm Desert of ail liabilities relative to any deed restrictions. I DO BY MY SIGNATURE ON THIS AGREEMENT, solve the City of-Pal of all liabilities regarding any deed restrictions at moy be a et'able to a property described herein. 9/23/83 / Signature Date Applicants Signature v 9/23/83 Signature Dote (FOR STAFF USE ONLY) Environmental Status Accepted by: ❑ Ministerial Act E.A. No. ❑ Categorical Exemption �LS NIOa ❑ l�lA LS N Negative Declaration �` ❑ Other Reference Case No. aMROnYlYTIIL 9xRVIC6 ATe e•IT-et 4S. C r,I I r, 1 81983 WARNER ENGINEERING W.o. .52031 �7��✓D S O U T H E R N C A L I F O R N I A S D 1 L A N D T E S T I N G . I N C . 6280 RIV EROLLE BT. 9AN DIEOO. CALIF. 92120 • TELE 213 O'1321 • P.O. BOX 20627 9AN OIEO0, CALIF. 92120 ] 4 - B 3 I V E L I E IN A T P A L M O E B E R T, C A L 1 F. 9 2 2 6 O • T E L E 3 4 6 1 C 9 B 67 B E N T E R P R I B E B T. E B C O N D 1 D O, C A L I F. 92 C 2 8 • T E L E ] 4 6 - 4 6 4 4 August 15, 1983 J and J Investors SCS&T 19635 890 Town and Country Road Report No. 2 Orange, California 92668 SUBJECT: Percolation Test Results, Proposed Five-Plex Structure, San Rafael Avenue, Palm Desert, California. Gentlemen: In accordance with your request , we have performed a deep percolation test at the subject site. The purpose of this test was to determine the absorp- tive characteristics of the underlying soils to allow the design of the proposed seepage pits. The subject site is a trapezium shaped parcel of land that is located adjacent to and east of San Rafael Avenue in the City of Palm Desert. Surrounding land use consists of developed and undeveloped residential property. The site is presently in an undeveloped state with drainage being accomplished by sheetflow along a general land slope of less than 5%. No wells were observed on or within 500 feet of the site. In general , the Palm Desert area is underlain by up to several hundred feet of Quaternary alluvial and aeolian deposits. The specific near- surface soils encountered during our investigation were predominantly brown , dry to humid, loose to medium dense, silty sands. S ❑ U T H E R N C A L I F 0 R N I A S ❑ 1 L A N D T E S T I N G , 1 N C . SCS&T 19635 August 15, 1983 Page 2 One deep percolation test was performed in accordance with the method recommended by the Riverside County Environmental Health Services Depart- inent. This method consists of drilling an eight-inch diameter test hole to the approximate depth of the proposed seepage pits , pre-soaking the hole, refilling the hole and measuring the rate of drop for the specified period of time. The results of the test are summarized below. Test Number Final Hole Depth Design Effluent Disposal Rate 1 20' 3.9 This. method used to calculate the allowable effluent absorption rate is given by: R = (F/T) (D) 9 L Where R = Rate in gallons/sq.ft./day of septic tank effluent F = Drop during time interval in feet T = Time interval in hours 0 = Diameter of hole in feet L = Average wetted depth during time interval in feet The field data sheets and corresponding calculations are shown on the attachments at the end of this report. Based upon the obtained rate of 3.8 gallons per square foot per day the required seepage pit depth can be determined from the following formulas. 5 Foot Diameter Pit Depth = Septic Tank Capacity 59.7 6 Foot Diameter Pit Depth = Septic Tank Capacity 73.3 S L U T H E R N C A L I � 0 R N A S O I L A N D T E S T I N G I N C . t 1 SCS&T 19635 August 15, 1983 Page 3 We recommend that all materials and methods of construction regarding seepage pit installation conform with good engineering practices and the minimum standards set forth by the Riverside County Environmental Health Department. Based on the results of our percolation tests , it appears that there is sufficient area at the site to support effluent disposal systems that will meet the current codes and standards of the Riverside County Health Depart- ment. It is further our opinion that the groundwater level will not encroach within the current allowable limit. If you should have any questions after reviewing this report, please do not hesitate to contact this office. This opportunity to be of professional service is sincerely appreciated. Respectfully submitted, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL & TESTING, INC. Curtis R. Burdett, C.E.G. N1090 CRB:mw cc: (4) Submitted (1) Warner Engineering ( 1) Richard O 'Rear, R.C.E. ( 1) City of Palm Desert ( 1) SCS&T, Palm Desert S O U T H E R N C A L I F 0 R N I A S ❑ 1 L A N 0 T E S T I N G . I N C . ,1 rj - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - -- - - -� - - - -- - --- - - - i - - - - - - _ - - - -1- - 7 I � s : B 2 • > r _ •B 3 c I _ \• 4 NO SCALE LEGEND: . BORING LOCATION , SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL & TESTING, INC. By SMS O"'T` 8- 8- 83 OeINO 19635 PLATE NO. 1 .. I I ( I ---- - - - - -- i - I � 1 i II I ii - R - - — .� ..:� { - - - -- --- -- I I I I I I SPUN FR'1 — �Cltl E7 + t11 Lnr^ 1 ANCN NOVLE� ._.-I_.__'n I 1 auei:tL uu�� I 1 I I I 1 {; I I I I 'Inro I + {AND AV , I r J ,.:. �tr 11.`�cq �• ,o•' a �� :1 6.rwc y�aat ,1LOP 'T—•� 1.. .. i I PAcatmr or r..r 0'"Ay n� or/___ •4n.N rqt +��LI�____ a ,{ � r�"�'°�_ I G ' I I I 1 I cAc%ox ul rv�:�w: 1 I I % d e'.uy:wlm m s rJ�—:.. �i9J I eeu� •e � � I 8 I ce 44TH T e o��W� AV 4 u sOMMA 9� o• snx.¢.pus - .A I GMETA AT—s '.", PU..VS • M 1 �_�- LFiel.xl ea : t. I LLryrvr. { T...eKO CM ~_—mil >: 1^._—. LS !i•v"In . •n GVCOeLUrC ne«<«D_— n.xc '' AV i on} i i e r 1 raP •L�� ><;j4 .rn�.. c ___ ___ _ SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA . SOIL & TESTING, INC. BY: sr+S DATE: 8-16-83 JOB NUMBER: 19635 Plate No. 2 r^ _ram T Y w O Z `> r BORING NUMBER 3 r W r Z 0 9 W w z r Q z ¢ z w _ r z rn ¢ > 0 2 W U W 7 W r f/1 Q Q O z _ 7 r _ _ r W ELEVATION ¢ r ¢ y z ¢ r - w _ r Z r r G d Q N Q - W r N - C u 0 O W Q U 0 - 6 G - r W w 'a 0 d z z N N ) = W 0 C N < Q Q O 0 W G ¢ f O ¢ I DESCRIPTION O a n O O D U . _ U SM BROWN, SILTY SAND (Qal ) HUMID LOOSE TO DRY SP 7 SP 9 5 MEDIUM DENSE SP 13 10 SP 10 15 SP 16 20 25 30 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION LOG SOIL & TESTING, INC. LOGGED BY: CRB DATE LOGGED: 8-16-83 JOB NUMBER: 19635 Plate No. 3 PERCOLATION READINGS FIELD W SHEET Gn JpB: 5 - Plex Structure DATE: July 29, 1983_ JOB NUMBER: 19635 _ WEATHER: Clear & Warm TESTED BY: C. R. Burdett TEMPERATURE: 100°F HOLE # 1 DEPTH 20' HOLE # DEPTH HOLE # DEPTH TIME READING DROP TIME READING RATE TI14E READING RATE FEET rEET 11 :00 4.0 - - - 11 :25 15. 3 11•.3 11 : 30 4.0 - - - 11 :55 14.8 10.8 12:00 4.0 - - - i 12: 10 7.3 3. 3 i 12: 15 4.0 - - - 12:25 6.5 2. 5 12: 30 4.0 - - - 12:40 6. 1 2.1 12:45 4.0 - - - 12:55 5.5 1 .6 1 :00 4.0 - - - 1 : 10 5. 7 1 .8 1 : 15 4.0 - - - 1 :25 5.4 1 .6 r^• TEST NUMBER 1 F = 1 .6 Feet D = 0.67 Feet T = 0. 167 Feet L = 15.3 Feet 1 .6 R = .167 (9) = 3.8 gallons/sq. ft./day 15.3 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL A TESTING, INC. BY: URB DATE: 8-15-83 16 JOB NUMBER: 1963q Plate No. 5 i WARNER FNFINIA W.o GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION PROPOSED APARTMENT BUILDING SAN RAFAEL NEAR CATALINA NAY PALM DESERT. CALIFORNIA t, 1 J" SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL & TESTING INC. GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION PROPOSED APARTMENT BUILDING SAN RAFAEL NEAR CATALINA WAY PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA PREPARED FOR: J A J Investors 890 Town and Country Road Orange, California 92668 PREPARED BY: Southern California Soil 5 Testing, Inc. Post Office Box 20627 6280 Riverdale Street San Diego, California . 92120 T S O U T H E R N C A L I F O R N I A SOIL AND TESTING , I N C . 6280 RI V ERDALE ST. BAN DIEDD. CALIF. 92120 • TELE 280-4321 • P.D. BOX 20627 SAN DIEOO. CALIF. 92120 7 4 - 8 O 1 V E L I E W A Y P A L M O E B E R T. C A L 1 F. 9 2 2 6 0 • T E L E 2 1 6 1 0 9 8 6 9 8 E N T E R P R 1 8 E 8 T. E B C 0 N D I D O, C A L I F. 9 2 0 2 6 • T E L E T { 6 - A 64 1 ' August 10, 1983 J & J Investors SCS&T 19635 890 Town and Country Road Report No. 1 Orange, California 92668 Attention: Mr. Jim Ewart SUBJECT: Report of Geotechnical Investigation, Proposed Apartment Build- ing, San Rafael Near Catalina Way, Palm Desert, California. Gentlemen: In accordance with your request, we have completed a geotechnical investi - gation for the proposed project. We are presenting herewith our findings and recommendations. The findings of this study indicate that the site is suitable for the proposed development provided the recommendations presented in the at- tached report are complied with. If you have any questions after reviewing the findings and recommendations contained in the attached report, please do not hesitate to contact this office. This opportunity to be of professional service is sincerely appreciated. Respectfully submitted, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL & TESTING, INC. obert Russell , R.C.E. 932142 Curtis R. Burdett, C.E.G. #1090 RRR:CRB:mw cc: (4) Submitted ( 1 ) Warner Engineering ( 1 ) Richard O 'Rear, R.C.E. ( 1) City of Palm Desert (1) SCS&T, Palm Desert S O U T H E R N C A L I F 0 R N I A S O I L A N D T E S T I N 13 , 1 N C . TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE Introduction and Project Description. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . .1 Project Scope.. .. . . . . . . . . ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . .. . . . ... . . . .. .. . . . . .1 Findings. . . .. . . . . .. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . ... . . . . .. . .. .. ... . . .. . ...... . . ...3 Site Description.. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. .3 General Geology and Subsurface Conditions. . . .. . . .. ... . . . . . . .. . .. . . . ..4 Soil Description... .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . .. . . ... . . . . . . ... .. ... . . . .4 Groundwater. . . . . . .. .. . . ... . .. . . . .. . . . . . .. .. . .. . . . . . ... .. ... . . . ..4 Tectonic Setting.. . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . .. . . . ... . . . . . . ... . .. . . . .. . . . . . .4 Seismicity. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . ... . . ...4 .Geologic Hazards. . . . . .. .. . . . . .. . . . . . . .. .. . . .. . . . . .. .. .. . . . ... . . . . .. . ..5 Recommendations and Conclusions.. . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . .. . .... .... . . . . . . ... ..7 General Design Considerations.. . . .. .. . . .. . . . . .. . .. .. . . .. . .... .. . .. .. .7 Site Preparation. . . ... . .. . .. .. . . . . .. . . .. . . . . ...... ... . . . ... ... . ... ...7 Building Pads. .. . . . .. . . .. . . . . .. . . . .. .. . .. . . . . .. . . . ... .... . . . .. ..7 Paved Areas. . . . . . . . .. ..... ... .. . . .. . . . ... . . . . .... . . . .. . . . .. . . ...8 Swimming Pools and Whirlpools... . ... . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . ... . . .8 Earthwork. . . . . . . . ... . .. ... . .. .. . . . . . . .. . .. . . . .. . . . . ..... .. . ... ..8 Foundations.. . . .. .. . . .. ... .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . .. . .... . .9 General . . . . .. . . ... . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . .. .. . .. ... ... ... . .. . ...... . .....9 Bearing Capacity... . . . .. . . . .... .. . . . . . ... . . ... . . . ............. . .9 Lateral Resistance. . . .... . .. .. . .. .... . ... . .. .. . . . ... . . ... .. . ...10 On-Grade Slabs.. . . . . . .. . . . .. . .... . .. . . .. .. . . .. . .. . . . .. .. . .. .. ..10 Settlement Characteristics. ... .. . .. .. .. .. .... .... . . . .... . . . . ...10 Expansive Characteristics. . . .. . . . . .. . . .... . . ... . . . ......... ....10 Limitations. . .. .. . . . . . ...... . . .. .. . ... .. ... ... .. .. . . . ... . . . .. . ...... . ...11 Review, Observation and Testing. ... . . . . .. . . .. . . . .. .... . . ........... .11 Uniformity of Conditions. ... ... . ... . . .... . .... . .. . . . . . . . ... .. .......11 Change in Scope. . . . . . . . . ... .... . .. ... . ..... .... ...... . ... .. . .. .. . . . .11 Time Limitations.. . . ... . . .. . . . . . . ....... . . . .... . . ... . . . ..... . . ..... .12 Professional Standard. .. . . . . ... . . . ... . . . .. . .. .. . .. ..... .. ..... ......12 Client' s Responsibility.. . . ... . . . . . . .. .. . . ... . . . . .. .... . .. . . . . .. . ...12 Field Explorations.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . ... .. . . . . .. . . . .. . . . .13 Laboratory Testing. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . ..14 ATTACHMENTS PAGE Figure 1 Site Vicinity Map. . . ... . . . .... . . .. .. . . ........ . . . .. . . . . . . .. ...2 PLATES Plate 1 Plot Plans Plate 2 Unified Soil Classification Chart, Plate 3-5 Boring Logs Plate 6 Direct Shear Test Results Maximum Density and Optimum Moisture Content Plate 7 Grain Size Analysis and Atterburg Limits APPENDIX Recommended Grading Specifications and Special Provisions T S O ❑ T H E R N C A L I F O R N I A SOIL AND TESTING , I N C . 62SO RIVERDALE ST. SAN OIEDO, CALIF. 92120 • TELE 2B D-9321 • P.D. BOX 20617 SAN DIEDD, CALIF. 9212D 9 4 - B 3 1 VELIE W A V P A L M D E B E R T. C A L I f. 9 2 2 6 D • T E L E 3 4 6 1 D 9 B 6 9 B E N T E R P R I S E S T. E B C O N D 1 D D, C A L I F. 9 3 D 2 6 • T E L E 9 4 6 - 4 B 4 4 GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION PROPOSED APARTMENT COMPLEX SAN RAFAEL NEAR CATALINA WAY PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA INTRODUCTION AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION This report presents the results of our geotechnical investigation for a proposed apartment building which is to be located near the intersection of San Rafael Avenue and Catalina Way in the City of Palm Desert, Calif- ornia. It is our understanding that a five-unit , single-story apartment building and swimming pool are planned for this site. It has further been assumed that only a minimal amount of grading will be necessary to develop the site. This assumption was based on the rela- tively level nature of this site and surrounding properties. The site configuration and exploration locations are shown on Plate Number 1. The following Figure Number 1 provides a vicinity map for this project. PROJECT SCOPE This investigation consisted of: surface reconnaissance; subsurface explorations; obtaining representative disturbed and undisturbed samples; laboratory testing; analysis of the field and laboratory data; research of available geological literature pertaining to the site; and preparation of this report. Specifically, the intent of our analysis was to: S ❑ ❑ T H E R N C A L I F ❑ R N I A S O I L A N D T E S T I N G , 1 N C . Page 2 .J 211 1 _�1 0 Fo by 3� b F 1�1 PALM DESERT '.;.:"•... atr.10 rw+a..;i.�,�,�;., 1 LS SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA Proposed Apartment Building, San Rafael �--�' SOIL A TESTING91NC. BY: CRB DATE: 8-9-83 JOB NUMBER: 19635 Figure No. 1 SCS&T 19635 August 10, 1983 Page 3 a) Explore the subsurface conditions to the depths ,influenced by the proposed construction. b) Evaluate, by laboratory tests, the pertinent engineering proper- ties of the various strata which will influence the development, including their bearing capacities, expansive characteristics and settlement potential . c) Define the general geology at the site including possible geolog- ic hazards which could have an effect on the site development. d) Develop soil engineering criteria for site grading. e) Determine potential construction difficulties and provide recom- mendations concerning these problems. f) Recommend an appropriate foundation system for the type of struc- tures anticipated and develop soil engineering design criteria for the recommended foundation design. FINDINGS SITE DESCRIPTION The project site is a trapezium shaped lot that is located adjacent to and east of San Rafael Avenue in the City of Palm Desert. Surrounding land use consists of developed and undeveloped residential property. The site is relatively level and drainage is accomplished by sheetflow in a general westerly direction. Vegetation consists of a light to moderate growth of grases with several trees near the periphery. No structures currently occupy the site and no evidence of former structures was noted during our investigation. 5 0 U T H E R N C A L I F 0 R N I A S O I L A N 0 T E S T I N G I N C . • i SCS&T 19635 August 10, 1983 Page 4 GENERAL GEOLOGY AND SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS SOIL DESCRIPTION: The Palm Desert area of the Coachella Valley is typi- cally underlain by Quaternary alluvial and aeolian deposits which are believed to be several hundred feet thick. The soils which comprise these deposits consist of gravels, sands and silts. Crystalline bedrock under- lies these soils at an undetermined depth. More specifically, the near surface soils encountered in our subsurface explorations were noted to be silty sands and poorly graded, slightly silty sands. These deposits were observed to be relatively uniform across this site and were generally dry to humid and loose to medium dense. GROUNDWATER: No groundwater was encountered within 30 feet of existing grade and no groundwater related problems are anticipated either during or after construction. TECTONIC SETTING: The site is located between the San Andreas Fault Zone and the San Jacinto Fault Zone, two of the known major active fault zones in the Southern California area. The San Andreas Fault Zone is approxi- mately 8 miles to the northeast and the San Jacinto Fault Zone is approxi- mately 17 miles to the southwest. SEISMICITY: Both the San Andreas Fault Zone and the San Jacinto Fault Zone are classified as active fault zones. Because this project site is closer to the San Andreas Fault Zone than the San Jacinto Fault Zone, the former should be used as the "design" fault. The San Andreas Fault Zone is generally considered to have two major branches in the vicinity of the subject site. The two branches are the Mission Creek Fault and the Banning Fault, both of which are classified as active branches. The San Andreas Fault Zone is the largest and most studied fault zone in California so much seismic information is available. 5 0 U T H E R N C A L I F 0 R N I A S O I L A N 0 T E S T I N G . I N C . SCS&T 19635 August 10, 1983 Page 5 The seismicity of the Mission Creek and Banning branches of the San An- dreas Fault Zone has been studied in the area near the project site. The historical seismicity of the study area from 1932 to 1972 and the project- ed number of events per 100 years is summarized in the following table adapted from the Riverside County Seismic Safety Report (1976). Earthquake Magnitude No. of Events No. of Events (Richter) (1932-1972) (100-Year Interval ) 2.0-2.4 12 29.3 2.5-2.9 81 197.6 3.0-3.4 164 400.0 3.5-3.9 60 146.3 4.0-4.4 19 46.3 4.5-4.9 5 12.2 5.0-5.4 2 4.9 5.5-5.9 0 0 6.0-6.4 0 0 6:4-6.9 1 2.4 GEOLOGIC HAZARDS The most likely geologic hazard to affect the site is groundshaking due to movement along the San Andreas Fault Zone or to a lesser degree, movement along the San Jacinto Fault Zone. Relative groundshaking hazard zones have been developed in Riverside County by dividing the county into five zones based on soil types and five zones based on the distance from causi- tive faults. The distance zonations were chosen arbitrarily and are defined in the technical report of .the Riverside County Seismic Safety Report ( 1976) so that Zone I includes ground accelerations for average site conditions up to that taken into account in the 1973 Edition of the Uniform Building Code with each successive zone representing a multiple of that acceleration. The project site is in Distance Zone III , and in Soil Type Zone B (alluvium of thin to intermediate thickness: 10-2,000 feet thick). S O U T H E R N C A L I F 0 R N I A 5 0 1 L A N D T E S T I N G . I N C . SCS&T 19635 August 10 , 1983 Page 6 Recurrence intervals and magnitudes of earthquakes along the San Andreas Fault Zone are given in the following table as taken from the Riverside County Seismic Safety Report ( 1976). Richter Magnitude Recurrence Interval (Years) 8.0 Maximum Credible 7.5 200-500 7.0 100-200 6.5 50-100 The project planned for the subject site is assigned to Use Category D (Normal-Low Risk) as defined by the Riverside County Seismic Safety Report so that the design earthquake recommended is the 6.5 event on the San Andreas Fault Zone. According to the table of Generalized Character- istics of Expected Earthquakes that is presented in the Riverside County Seismic Safety Report, maximum ground acceleration at the site should be considered to be as high as 0.46 g. Predominant period of groundshaking and duration of "strong" shaking should be considered to be 0.1 to 0.3 . seconds and 10 to 20 seconds respectively. Construction in accordance with the minimum standards of the Uniform Building Code and other applicable ordinances should minimize potential structural damage resulting from seismic activity. Other geologic hazards such a; liquefaction, tsunamis, seict.Es, or land- sliding that could possibly affect the site can be considered to be mini- mal or nonexistent. 5 ❑ U T N E R N C A L I F ❑ R N I A S O I L A N ❑ T E S T I N G . I N C . SCSET 19635 August 10, 1983 Page 7 RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS GENERAL DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS The findings of this study indicate that the site is suitable for the proposed development. The settlement potential of the alluvium will however require that special site preparation and foundation design be utilized. Methods to alleviate potential settlement problems consist of removing and recompacting the compressible materials, utilizing pier or pile founda- tions or utilizing specially design foundation systems in conjunction with a mat of uniformly compacted soils. The recommendations which are present within this report are not intended to completely eliminate the possible settlement problems, but are intended to minimize the effects of possible settlements and :t the same time minimize foundation costs. With this in mind our analysis indicates that the use of a compacted soil mat with specially designed footings should provide a most economic means of devel- oping the proposed project. Based upon this, the following recommenda- tions are provided. SITE PREPARATION BUILDING PADS: Due to the apparent loose consistency of the near surface soils at this site, we recommend that they be removed and recompacted to at least 90% of maximum dry density. It is our opinion that the depth of removal should extend to at least 2 feet below the bottom of all footings. The soils exposed at the base of this excavation should be moisture treat- ed to a minimum of 1% above optimum condition and densified to 90% rela- tive compaction to a depth of 12 inches. The previously removed soils and any additional fill may then be replaced in eight inch lifts, watered to at least 1% above optimum requirements and compacted to a minimum of 90% S ❑ U T H E R N C A L I F 0 R N I A S ❑ 1 L- A N D T E S T I N G I N C SCS&T 19635 August 10, 1983 Page 8 of maximum dry density. The intent of these recommendations is to provide at least 3 feet of compacted soil beneath all footings. At this depth, it is believed that the loads induced will become minimal and should not significantly contribute to settlements. The horizontal limits of these recommendations should include the area within a perimeter of 5 feet outside the building exterior. We further recommend that Southern Calif- ornia Soil and Testing, Inc. be retained during site grading to determine that the intent of the above recommendations have been satisfied. PAVED AREAS: We recommend that the soils beneath areas to be paved should be moisture treated to at least 2% above optimum conditions and densified to 90%. The depth of the above recommendations should extend to at least 24 inches below subgrade elevation. SWIMMING PUULS AND WHIRLPOOLS: Since groundwater was not encountered within 30 feet of the natural grade, there should be no groundwater re- lated problems during pool construction. However, because the in-situ soils appear to be erratic in density, we recommend the soils at the bottom of the pool excavation be densified to a depth of 24 inches to a minimum of 90% relative compaction. Further, all pool backfill and the soils to a depth of 2 feet under the pool perimeter slab should be com- pacted to a minimum of 90% relative compaction. EARTHWORK: All earthwork and grading contemplated for site preparation should be accomplished in accordance with the attached Recommended Grading Specifications and Special Provisions. All special site preparation recommendations presented in the sections above will supersede those in the standard Recommended Grading Specifications. All embankments, struc- tural fill , and fill should be compacted to a minimum of 90% of its maxi- mum dry density. Utility trench backfill within 5 feet of the proposed structures and beneath asphalt pavements should be compacted to a minimum of 90% of its maximum dry density. The maximum dry density of each soil type should be determined in accordance with A.S.T.M. Test Method 1557-78, Method A or C. S O U T H E R N C A L I F 0 R N I A - S O I L A N 0 T E 5 T I N G . I N C . SCS&T 19635 August 10, 1983 Page 9 FOUNDATIONS GENERAL: It is our opinion that the proposed structures may be supported by spread footings provided the recommendations contained in this report are followed. All footings should be founded at least 12 inches below lowest adjacent finished grade with a minimum width of 12 inches. All continuous footings should also be reinforced with at least one No. 4 bar top and bottom. 1 BEARING CAPACITY: The allowable soil bearing pressure for the soils prepared as recommended herein is expressed by the following formulas for continuous, square, and circular spread footings: Continuous Footings q = 1.22 + 0.47 D + 0.16 B Square Footings q = 1.46 + 0.56 D + 0.13 B Circular Footings q = 1.46 + 0.56 D + 0.10 B Where: q = Allowable soil bearing pressure as limited in shear in kips per square foot for full live and dead loads. D = Footing depth below adjacent grade in feet. B = Footing width or diameter in feet. The above allowable stresses may be increased by one-third for wind and/or seismic loading and should be decreased by one-fourth for dead load only. Continuous Footings 1.85 Square Footings 2.15 Circular Footings 2.12 S O U T H E R N C A l l F ❑ R N I A S ❑ 1 l A N ❑ T E S T I N G . I N C . SCS&T 19635 August 10, 1983 Page 10 The allowable bearing pressures for other size footinys m•ay be computed from the above formulas. We recommend, however, that the maximum allow- able soil bearing pressure be limited to 3.5 kips per square foot in order to control settlements. LATERAL RESISTANCE: Resistance to lateral loads may be provided by fric- tion at the ; ase of the footing and by passive pr^ssure against the adja- cent soil . For concrete footings on compacted soil , a coefficient of friction of 0.35 may be used. For calculating passive pressure, an equi- valent fluid unit weight of 225 pounds per cubic foot may be used. Pas- sive pressure should not exceed 1,500 pounds per square foot. When com- bining frictional and passive resistance, the latter should be reduced by one-third. ON-GRADE SLABS: The high .temperature differential endemic to desert areas makes large concrete slabs-on-grade susceptible to tension cracks. Con- sideration should be given to reinforcing large on-grade slabs with 6"x6"- 10/10 welded wire mesh in order to reduce the potential for differential movement of the slab along shrinkage cracks which may develop. Further, weakened plane joints should reduce the probability of developing un- sightly and irregular cracks. SETTLEMENT CHARACTERISTICS: The anticipated total and/or differential settlements for the proposed structure may be considered to be within tolerable limits provided the recommendations presented in this report are followed. EXPANSIVE CHARACTERISTICS: The prevailing foundation soils were found to be nondetrimentally expansive and will not require special consideration and/or design. S O U T H E R N C A L I F 0 R N I A S O I L A N 0 T E S T I N O I N C . SCS&T 19635 August 10, 1983 Page 11 LIMITATIONS REVIEW, OBSERVATION AND TESTING It is recommended that Southern California Soil & Testing, Inc. be retain- ed to provide continuous soil engineering services during the earthwork operations. This is to observe compliance with the design concepts, specifications or recommendations and to allow design changes in the event that subsurface conditions differ from those anticipated prior to start of construction. UNIFORMITY OF CONDITIONS The recommendations and opinions expressed in this report reflect our best estimate 6f the project requirements based on an evaluation of the subsur- face soil conditions encountered at the subsurface exploration locations and the assumption that the soil conditions do not deviate appreciably from those encountered. It should be recognized that the performance of the foundations and/or cut and fill slopes may be influenced by undisclos- ed or unforeseen variations in the soil conditions that may occur in the intermediate and unexplored areas. Any unusual conditions not covered in this report that may be encountered during site development should be brought - to the attention of the soils engineer so that modifications may be made if necessary. CHANGE IN SCOPE This office should be advised of any changes in the project scope or .proposed site grading so that it may be determined if the recommendations contained herein are appropriate. This should be verified in writing or modified by a written addendum. S O U T H E R N C A L I F 0 R N I A S O I L A N 0 T E S T I N G . I N C . SCS&T 19635 August 10 , 1983 Page 12 TIME LIMITATIONS The findings of this report are valid as of this date. Changes in the condition of a property can, however, occur with the passage of time, whether they be due to natural processes or the work of man on this or adjacent properties. In addition, changes in the State-of-the-Art and/or Government Codes may occur. Due to such changes, the findings of this report may be invalidated wholly or in part by changes beyond our control . Therefore, this report should not be relied upon after a period of two years without a review by us verifying the suitability of the conclusions and recommendations. PROFESSIONAL STANDARD In the performance of our professional services , we comply with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of our profession cur- rently practicing under similar conditions and in the same locality. The client recognizes that subsurface conditions may vary from those encoun- tered at the locations where our borings, surveys, and explorations are made, and that our data, interpretations, and recommendations are based solely on the information obtained by us. We will be responsible for those data, interpretations, and recommendations, but shall not be respon- sible for the interpretations by others of the information developed. Our services consist of professional consultation and observation only, and no warranty of any kind whatsoever, express or implied, is made or intended in connection with the work performed or to be performed by us, or by our proposal for consulting or other services, or by our furnishing of oral or written reports or findings. CLIENT'S RESPONSIBILITY It is the responsibility of J 8 J Investors, or their representative to ensure that the information and recommendations contained herein are 5 ❑ U T H E R N C A L I F ❑ R N I A 5 ❑ I L A N ❑ T E S T I N G I N C . SCS&T 19635 August 10, 1983 Page 13 brought to the attention of the engineer and architect for the project and incorporated into the project 's plans and specifications. It is further their responsibility to take the necessary measures to ensure that the contractor and his subcontractors carry out such recommendations during construction. FIELD EXPLORATIONS Three subsurface explorations were made at the locations indicated on the attached Plate Number 1 on July 29, 1983. These explorations consisted of borings extended by means of a rotary augered drill rig. The field work was conducted under the observation of our engineering geology personnel . The explorations were carefully logged when made. These logs are present- ed on the following Plate Numbers 3 through 5. The soils are described in accordance with the Unified Soils Classification System as illustrated on the attached simplified chart Plate Number 2. In addition, a verbal textural description, the wet color, the apparent moisture and the density or consistency are presented. The density of granular material is given as either very loose, loose, medium dense, dense or very dense. Disturbed and undisturbed samples of typical and representative soils were obtained and returned to the laboratory for testing. Representative core samples were obtained by means of a 2 3/8" I .D. split tube sample driven into the soil by means of a 140 pound weight free falling a distance of 30 inches. The number of blows required to drive the split tube sampler is indicated on the boring logs as "penetration resistance". The core sam- ples were carefully removed, sealed, and returned to the laboratory for testing. In addition, standard penetration tests were performed using a 1 3/8" I .D. sampler. The number of blows required to drive the sampler a distance of 12 inches is also indicated on the boring logs. S O U T H E R N C A L I F ❑ R N I A S ❑ 1 L A N ❑ T E S T I N G . 1 N C . SCSET 19635 August 10, 1983 Page 14 LABORATORY TESTING Laboratory tests were performed in accordance with the generally accepted American Society for Testing and Materials (A.S.T.M. ) test methods or suggested procedures. A brief description of the tests performed is presented below: a) MOISTURE-DENSITY: Field moisture content and dry density were determined for representative undisturbed samples obtained. This information was an aid to classification and permitted recogni - tion of variations in material consistency with depth. The dry unit weight is determined in pounds per cubic foot, and the field moisture content is determined as a percentage of the soil 's dry weight. The results are summarized in the trench logs. b) CLASSIFICATION: Field classifications were verified in , the laboratory by visual examination. The final soil classifica- tions are in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System. c) DIRECT SHEAR TESTS: Direct shear tests were performed to deter- mine the failure envelope based -on yield shear strength. The shear box was designed to accomodate a sample having a diameter of 2.375 inches or 2.50 inches and a height of 1.0 inch. Samples were tested at different vertical loads and at saturated moisture content. The shear stress was applied at a constant rate of strain of approximately 0.05 inches per minute. The results of these tests are presented on attached Plate Number 6. d) COMPACTION TEST: The maximum dry density and optimum moisture content of typical soils were determined in the laboratory in accordance with A.S.T.M. Standard Test D-1557-78, Method A. The results of these tests are presented on the following Plate Number 6. S O U T H E R N C A L I F ❑ R N I A S ❑ 1 L A N ❑ T E S T I N G . I N C . SCS&T 19635 August 10, 1983 Page 15 e) GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION: The grain size distribution was deter- mined for representative samples of the native soils in accor- dance with A.S.T.M. Standard Test D-422. The results of these tests are presented on Plate Number 7. S O U T H E R N C A L I F ❑ R N I A S ❑ 1 L A N D T E S T I N G . I N C . i I 1 i - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - 7 b UNIT-/- UNIT•I 4 N/T-2 k NIT- 1 `1F //I B 5C� ` _. 2 * ffiBl ' 9B3 ` � V60 'Ji P°P tY�t/ INO SCALE LEGEND: BORING LOCATION { I II I� I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL & TESTING, INC. k i ar SMS DATE 8- 8-83 o)e NO! 19635 PLATE NO. 1 SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION LEGEND UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION CHART SOIL DESCRIPTION GROUP SYMBOL TYPICAL )LAMES 1. COARSE GRAINED, More than half of material is larger than No. 200 sieve size. GRAVELS CLEAN GRAVELS Gw well graded gravels, gravel- More than half of sand mixtures, little or no coarse fraction is fines. larger than No. a GP Poorly graded gravels, gravel sieve size but - sand mixtures, Little or no smaller than 1". fines. GRAVELS WITH FINES GM Silty gravels, poorly graded (Appreciable amount gravel-sand-silt mixtures. of fines) GC Clayey gravels, poorly graded gravel-sand, clay mixtures. SANDS CLEAN SANDS Sw well graded sand,gravelly More than hale of sands, little or no fines. coarse fraction is SP Poorly graded sands,gravelly smaller than No. 1 sands, little or no fines. sieve size. SANDS WITH FINES SM Silty sands, poorly graded (Appreciable amount sand and silt mixtures. of fines) SC Clayey sands, poorly graded sand and clay mixtures. 11. FINE GRAINED, More than half of material is sma Ller than No. 200 sieve size. SILTS AND CLAYS ML Inorganic silts and very fine sands, rock flour, sandy silt or clayey-silt-sand mixtures with slight plast- icity Liquid Limit CL Inorganic clays of lcw to less than 50 medium plasticity,gravelly clays, sandy clays,siLty clays, lean clays. OL Organic silts and organic Silty clays of low plasticity SILTS AND CLAYS Mi Inorganic silts, micaceous or diatomaceous fine sandy or silty soils, elastic silts. Liquid Limit CM Inorganic clays of high g r.at�s than in Plasticity, fat clays. on Or9antc <.eye of m.ediun, to high Plasticity. HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS PT Peat and other highly organic soils. s - Water level at time of excavat,on or as indicated US - Undisturbed , driven ring sample or tube sample C - Undisturbed chum, sample BG - Bulk sample SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL & TESTING INC. Proposed Apartment Building f 6080 AlvEiiOAL■ •TqNMT San Rafael Near Catalina Way BAN 04HOO, CALIFOn NIA ■eI20 ev RRR DATE 8-10-83 JOB NO. 19635 Plate — - = zd - > o BORING NUMBER 1 W " ' ° u w 2 2 w W F_ ~ Z a N G >_ O U ELEVATION ¢ ¢ H 2 w I w - z 1- S (L O w Q td Q — W H 0 u to W Q U a - M ul o G Q H y m O d Z = M '" > O = w a 0 Q Q Q O ¢ c W w 3 w O ix-+ DESCRIPTION U O a ¢ o 0 O O O U a U SM BROWN, SILTY SAND (Qal ) HUMID LOOSE TO DRY US 10 92.8 4.0 77 BG US 17 105.8 3.0 87 5 SP 10 MEDIUM DENSE US 24 106.0 2.7 88 10 SP 14 US 25 15 SP 15 US 22 20 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION LOG SOIL & TESTING914 C LOGGED BY: 0RB n4TE LOGGED: 7_' _ joe NUMBER: 19635 Plate No w z z — ° BORING NUMBER 2 w _ v w w z f' Q z ¢ 2 W - F- z N ¢ > O W J W VI Q Q O 2 7 H -' U ELEVATION ¢ `- ¢ m z cc .. w zt- O. p 0— LL Q N Q - W �.. N - O u N W < U' a — Lrn o W - o N v! Q < Q z0 ¢ W w 3 ¢ 2 Oz ¢ J DESCRIPTION U O d ¢ a V O O U — U SM BROWN, SILTY SAND (Qal ) HUMID LOOSE TO DRY US 16 BG US 11 98.0 3.1 81 5 SP 9 MEDIUM US DENSE 19 10 SP 11 US 20 15 SP 15 US 17 20 SOUTHERN ICALIFORN :A SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION LOG l SOIL & TESTING, INCi. LOGGED BY: CRB DATE LOGGED: 7_29-83 No . 4 JOB NUMBER: 19635 P1 W z > z j > _ Uf a BORING NUMBER 3 w Z ° u ~ w w z T H < 2 6 2 w - 1- Z _9 y S > O Z W J U W 7 w F- w < < p z /- r J _ ELEVATION w y z w w Z z F- LL p 0 w 41 a p 1 Z p z y N > O z 0 W a p N Q < < O J DESCRIPTION U a ¢ y p O O U - U D SM BROWN, SILTY SAND (Qal ) HUMID LOOSE TO DRY SP 7 SP 9 5 MEDIUM DENSE SP 13 10 SP 10 15 SP 16 20 25 - 30 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION LOG <*> SOIL ATESTING9 INC. LOGGED BY: CRB I DATE LOGGED: 7-29-83 FjDB NUMBER: 19635 Plate No. 5 DIRECT SHEAR TEST RESULTS angle of cohesion SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Internal Intercept friction (0) (pat) { B 1 @ 1-3 Remolded to 90% 27 175 B 2 @ 25 Undisturbed 28 125 MAXIMUM DENSITY and OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT ASTM1557-79 METHODS_ maximum optimum SAMPLE DESCRIPTION density moisture pcf content B-1 @ 1-3 Brown Silty Sand 120.9 11.0 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA Pro osed A artment Building SOIL A TESTING, INC. BY RRR DATE uaD wlNawDALa ■Twasy B-11-63 •AN DI�DD. CALWORN1A eM1ZD JOB NO. 19635 JPlate No. 6 GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS AND ATTERBURG LIMITS SAMPLE B-1 @ 1-3 6" 4" 3" I - 2" 1%2 . w a 100 3 Q m z #4 94. 1 Cc — W m lZ—L 6 #8 87.1 #16 79. 1 z 0 a #30 70.7 M #50 58. 3 #100 37.3 #200 22. 7 cc .05 mm w f 0 .005 mm cc 0 _ .001 mm LIQUID LIMIT PLASTIC LIMIT PLASTICITY INDEX i UNIFIED CLASSIFICATION SM i 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA Proposed Apartment Building SOIL & TESTING LAB, INC. BY RRR DATE 8-11-83 1 OQBO AIVEOO/ LE 9TPEET EAN DIEOO, CALIFOOIVIA 82120 joB No. 19635 Plate No. 7 SCS&T 19635 August 11 , 1983 Appendix A, Page 1 PROPOSED APARTMENT BUILDING, SAN RAFAEL NEAR CATALINA MAY . RECOMMENDED GRADING SPECIFICATIONS - GENERAL PROVISIONS GENERAL INTENT The intent of these specifications is to establish procedures for clear- ing, compacting natural ground, preparing areas to be filled, and placing and compacting fill soils to the lines and grades shown on the accepted plans. The recommendations contained in the preliminary soil investiga- tion report and/or the attached Special Provisions are a part of the Recommended Grading Specifications and shall supersede the provisions contained hereinafter in the case of conflict. These specifications shall only be used in conjunction with the soil report for which they are a part. No deviation from these specifications will be allowed, except where specified in the soil report or in other written communication signed by the Soil Engineer. OBSERVATION AND TESTING Southern California Soil & Testing, Inc. shall be retained as the Soil Engineer to observe and test the earthwork in accordance with these speci - fications. It will be necessary that the Soil Engineer or his representa- tive provide adequate observation so that he may provide an opinion that the work was or was not accomplished as specified. It shall be the re- sponsibility of the contractor to assist the soil engineer and to keep him apprised of work schedules, changes and new information and data so that he may provide these opinions. In the event that any unusual conditions not covered by the special provisions or preliminary soil report are encountered during the grading operations, the Soil Engineer shall be contacted for further recommendations. SCS&T 19635 August 11 , 1983 Appendix A, Page 2 If, in the opinion of the Soil Engineer, substandard conditions are en- countered, such as ; questionable or unsuitable soil , unacceptable moisture content , inadequate compaction, adverse weather, etc. , he will be empower- ed to either stop construction until the conditions are remedied or cor- rected or recommend rejection of this work. Test methods used to determine the degree of compaction should be per- formed in accordance with the following American Society for Testing and Materials test methods: Maximum Density & Optimum Moisture Content - A.S.T.M. D-1557-78. Density of Soil In-Place - A.S.T.M. D-1556-64 or A..S.T.M. D-2922. All densities shall be expressed in terms of Relative Compaction as deter- mined by the foregoing A.S.T.M. testing procedures. PREPARATION OF AREAS TO RECEIVE FILL All vegetation, brush and debris derived from clearing operations shall be removed, and legally disposed of. All areas disturbed by site grading should be left in a neat and finished apperance, free from unsightly debris. Any abandoned buried structures encountered during grading operations must be totally removed. All underground utilities to be abandoned beneath any proposed structure should be removed from within 10 feet of the structure and properly capped off. The resulting depressions from the above des- cribed procedures should be backfilled with acceptable soil that is com- pacted to the requirements of the Soil Engineer. This includes, but is not limited to, septic tanks , fuel tanks , sewer lines or leach lines , 5 ❑ U T H E R N C A L I r ❑ R N 1 A i 0 1 L A N ❑ f i SCS&T 19635 August 11 , 1983 Appendix A, Page 3 storm drains and water lines . Any buried structures or utilities not to be abandoned should be investigated by the Soil Engineer to determine if any special recommendation will be necessary. All .water wells which will be abandoned should be backfilled and capped in accordance to the requirements set forth in the Geotechnical Report. The top of the cao should be at least 4 feet below finish grade or 3 feet below the bottom of footing whichever is greater. The type of cap will depend on the diameter of the well and should be determined by the Soil Engineer and/or a qualified Structural Engineer. When the slope of the natural ground receiving fill exceeds 20% (5 hori - zontal units to 1 vertical unit) , the original ground shall he stepped or benched. Bencnes shali be cut to a firm competent soil condition. The lcaer bench shall be at least 10 feet wide or 1 1/2 times the equipment width which ever is greater and shall be sloped back into the hillside at a gradient of not less than two (2) percent. All other benches should be at least 6 feet wide. The horizontal portion of each bench shall be compacted prior to receiving fill as specified hereinbefore for compacted natural ground. Ground slopes flatter than 20% shall be benched when considered necessary by the Soil Engineer. After clearing or benching, the natural ground in areas to be filled shall be scarified to a depth of. 6 inches , brought to the proper moisture con- tent, compacted and tested for the minimum degree of compaction in the Special Provisions or the recommendation contained in the preliminary soil investigation report. All loose soils in excess of 6 inches thick should be removed to firm natural ground which is defined as natural soil which possesses an in-situ density of at least 85% of its maximum dry density. 9 ❑ U f H E P N C A L I F ❑ IR N I A o ❑ 1 L A N D T E S r 1 N 0 1 C «bae ��tU r SCS&T 19635 August 11 , 1983 Appendix A, Page 4 FILL MATERIAL Materials placed in the fill shall be approved by the soil engineer and shall be free of vegetable matter and other deleterious substances. Gran- ular soil shall contain sufficient fine material to fill the voids. The definition and disposition of oversized rocks, expansive and/or detrimen- tal soils are covered in the soils report or Special Provisions. Expan- sive soils, soils of poor gradation, or soils with low strength character- isi:ir_s inay be thcroughly mixed with other soils to provide satisfactory fill material , but only with the explicit consent of the soil engineer. Any import material shall be approved by the Soil Engineer before being bruught to the site. PLACING AND COMPACTION OF FILL Approved fill material shall be placed in areas prepared to receive fill in layers not to exceed 6 inches in compacted thickness. Each layer shall have a uniform inoisture content in the range that will allow the compac- tion effort to be efficiently applied to achieve the specified degree of compaction. Each layer shall be uniformly compacted to the minimum speci - fied degree of compaction .with equipment of adequate size to economically compact the layer. Compaction equipment should either be specifically designed for soil compaction or of proven reliability. The minimum degree of compaction to be achieved is specified in either the Special Provisions or the recommendations contained in the preliminary soil investigation report. When the structural fill material includes rocks, no rocks will be allowed to nest and all voids must be carefully filled with soil such that the minimum degree of compaction recommended . in the Special Provisions is i Il r1 r H E R N C A L I F ❑ Q N I A 9 0 L 4- N 0 r E n r i W c: . I N C SCS&T 19635 August 11 , 1983 Appendix A, Page 5 achieved. The maximum size and spacing of rock permitted in structural fills and in non-structural fills is discussed in the soil report, when applicable. Field observation and compaction tests to estimate the degree of compac- tion of the fill will be taken by the Soil Engineer or his representative. The location and frequency of the tests shall be at the Soil Engineer ' s discretion. When the compaction Lest indicates that a p_,rticula, layer is less than the required degree of compaction , the layer shall be reworked to the satisfaction of the Soil Engineer and until the desired relative compaction has been obtained. Fill slopes shall be compacted by means of sheepsfoot rollers or other Suitable equipment. Compaction by sheepsfoot rollers shall be at vertical intervals of not greater than four feet. 1n addition , fill slopes at ratios of two horizontal to one vertical or flatter, should be track- rolled. Steeper fill slopes shall be over-built and cut-back to finish contours. Slope compac�ion operations shall result in all fill material six or more inches inward from the finished face of the slope having a relative compaction of at least 90% of maximum dry density or that speci- fied in the Special Provisions section of this specification. The compac- tion operation on the slopes shall be continued until the Soil Engineer is satisfied that the slopes will be stable in regards to surficial stabil- ity. Slope tests will be made by the Soils Engineer during construction of the slopes to determine if the required compaction is being achieved. Where failing tests occur or other field problems arise, the Contractor will be notified that day of such conditions by written communication from the Soil Engineer in the form of a daily field report. I S n U T N E Q N C .4 l E 0 N I A ti 'l L 4 N D T f- T I N ,] 1 N C SCS&T 19635 August 11 , 1983 Appendix A, Page 6 If the method of achieving the required slope compaction selected by the Contractor fails to produce the necessary results , the Contractor shall rework or rebuild such slopes until the required degree of compaction is obtained, at no additional cost to the Owner or Soils Engineer. CUT SLOPES fhe Engineering Geologist shall inspect all cut slopes excavated in rock or lithified formational material during the grading operations at inter- vals determined at his discretion. If any conditions not anticipated in the preliminary report such as perched water, seepage, lenticular or confined strata of a potentially adverse .nature, unfavorably inclined bedding, joints or fault planes are encountered during grading, these conditions shall be analyzed by the Engineering Geologist and Soil Engi - neer to determine if mitigating measures are necessary. Unless otherwise specified in the soil and geological report , no cut slopes shall be excavated higher or steeper than that allowed by the ordinances of the controlling governmental agency. ENGINEERING OBSERVATION Field observation by the Soil Engineer or his representative shall be made during the filling and compacting operations so that he can express his opinion regarding the conformance of the grading with acceptable standards of practice. The presence of the Soil Engineer or his representative or the observation and testing shall not release the Grading Contractor from his duty to compact all fill material to the specified degree of compac- tion. n u Y N C'. 4 l c CI H N n . ❑ i t- n 1 0 1 t r , 1 C SCS&T 19635 August 11 , 1983 Appendix A, Page 7 SEASON LIMITS Fill shall not be placed during unfavorable weather conditions. When work is interrupted by heavy rain, filling operations shall not be resumed until the proper moisture content and density of the fill materials can be achieved. Damaged site conditions resulting from weather or acts of God shall be repaired before acceptance of work. RECOMMENDED GRADING SPECIFICATIONS-SPECIAL PROVISIONS The minimum degree of compaction to be obtained in compacting natural ground, in the compacted fill , and in the compacted backfill shall be at least 90 percent . Detrimentally expansive soil is defined as soil which will swell more than 3 percent against a pressure of 150 pounds per square foot from a condi - tion of 90 percent of maximum dry density and air dried moisture content to saturation. Oversized fill material is defined as rocks or lumps over 6 inches in diameter. At least 40 percent of the fill soils shall pass through a No. 4 U.S. Standard Sieve. Transition Lots: Where transitions between cut and fill occur within the proposed building pad, the cut portion should be undercut a minimum of one foot below the base of the proposed footings and recompacted as structural backfill . a N C A L F ❑ F N 1 4 9 ❑ 1 L n N ❑ T E i T I V ❑ I N C r ,_l.—.1 f�j-_o'P.-,I4 r_O",)—:_4.:I,4k�3---F.-.-+?.1.,`�1:—1Ir.�H_;-I;II II;�I:;I4II�_,-4 t.1-:I-I r,zI—AIoi--'--.0 x_-I - w t i+' .� ..:-..)-..._�.�_.-I...,-b,-L_.ft_.--4Q_QI L w—".-.�� II(.4-,9pt tI----_;p1-I.,:_,:_1I.14.1_f,1"_.�,j_.,I---.!'I_i I*I,I 1__--t\,,. p Y .. /�I.0-,"- .Iq'-,._(It_a_-.-Il5 i1-9 l-,l-.,irII,r,PLI..-,I I=i--i.,,,q,%,-.-I ;.*. 7 r_.,.-I�I.._...%'\,-,-- \,-.I,._-I I,IM _I.r._'_Fs-*_-1_"-7II J_/II,I\-.1-V A,--1I'!.,kI'1,7,,---.I4J 4,- I I_..-II I,"I-.-1_1_1 V,_._-/_-III:, j/,, I-.I-t r ,,I-"-(4 I7.e.; 1.I..-,II1-�I,.1 I...1�,l 1"..1.._.,1 I I I1 I., "I-1 A�..i_l —4_,0,t./_-TI I. ,4:�4._I A", .I I/I.II.�Jt'l.~ �.p�V 1%"..'4I.,Ir..6I,l.,II o,4:..;---0,---.k,:I ..<* .,`-,.z.1,I ,I_�,-.-.,I z,,,,-1...II:L. ,,. ,;,%s II I..L-..,.lv,II�-I. .I:I,.6II1.,:.-. .,I.1 I I_ .,.II-I1 I.. J , r ,I-...I,l 4I-V.I..I.I.._,E.I.,I,,...I I..,I., .III II-1.I-_*I-.I I,- .,r I.I 1 oI/.1,�11.II ,1,.....1...I.1-1-.-...III,_.-,,I-Il:.,I ' . .+ erg 3 h. y.., Il..!I I.I...1�I,Iv._1,I:--,_...III.%!-..1tL1"� r . .-.1!II,_l.I.."1 .,."1 J , w . _ :, f.. 1 t M, ��y { ,,. .,Ii i,�I. , r z I: ,;j 1I., 1 �. , x t r_ ed e w .: , `: 4 , ,Y. .. ` • .. r 1 v:. , r. .., a . r ,{, .+ I s > � d. : . r - - s y v . `yt• 4 , . .� t vY a y.n. a. .. 5 .. '.r _. - '; 1. .. , C � i. 1' r.... .. a+ oP".."!,. is f' -, r,' .'t. ♦. .: ...,."�,. ., # .,• _ - , - 'i , r c r r - �t ' ,pt y ... 'IP. sG, -.. s }y M< .. YJ� •'1. ...{ �. n. .r _ Y' r .. I�'Y _JC,- y . f' 31— it,' ,t'+'S ..> .., .. - ' : .._ .. �� ,,f ..t,, i. 1. II k4 II 11,1 u "(' L. _ �ya� , .. : - - - t rr p , • . . . r „ , • f r P # • 4 .. r . li FXM T 'illl Gt E ,�',�llv!►!�. Y / . j,r f�ES/DENCE i' �\ RES'/OENCE � 1� " . { `' * . a �►' . \ 7, - i N:_' - i / - .. I. , , I . - . r: :f' , _ �. __. ________, ..�.__...__._ _ . _ -- -- __ - __ _ _.._ ..--__ _ _ t4 57 .G 1 l' ,_ __ __. __ . _ .; , o � � ,} ' l- Po " t ' r h ' 0 PROPOSED (r0AlrRETE' OrPq/NAcSE tea ,}j I, EX/ST/NG /f/wo e'iVCE •. "'4I_,-II4.!--.I,l-,1 7.,l 1 I0._I.�-. .jJ-f,r-�_.-4..-�.,1-,1,i.7—,- -it" " , � ,A y� 1o�' IJVg � G�- � � ! � P�x�kP�'�� 6�VXZ,e �' � t y, 3� ` - Ri?OR0.SEO 1ff,4S'O/YRY '11 ,ZZ . y PROPoSED CONC ,QE'T.4/N/NG 01 ZZ ZO �( 0 r �:, f � ' i A, F9 $ . .. - . .. . • - . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . • - , . . . O o ,q 1 i--- .r•-.. .r Q - - ,.._ :4__ s-: --__ �`I ? ]j �o _ }. , �3 p. '- ..-....- _-__ •_•_ ___'__ ^� t i . \ *0\--." , q r"I CAR .CA P0VtT I __ ram.. --1 5. / r� Y. w � °D F eo4 00 1 .,I 4) j I ; 4 .. , o; -i�rIiiI1.II..--;ItI..-t-II,; i"-s-:I�2----N"I\-*--10-,\.Iii--,.-1_-1,4- l.- 4• . z°� �. , , , I ! PAD - 203. 7 , - - � . ' t. v t► �F y LlN"1 T• I �`ti►'I r. ,e & V! T . :, �f lV'/ �"_ 4 -r r / is ,� '' T ,.� }- Q ,$' � 5 T�hlc'1i4� 'IFVtrk�St� 57A1� J< '.__ 'FVF k U ' " i� w O n 1 10?.l�S , �r102. IQ f iG2./5 t 1, /G?.15b r !e�• � g � i i / t- t„u • -n • _ -C�NfRFTE - - VRt�lE -�� `.� �` D 2OG. rr: eO✓. 1V _ / 2a1.0�` ' • I E" --TI I_f.L-o8 IiI,-L�I.--'7:tI)IIIIII/If,,4 ZtI&1 II1,'_,JII 4 i9i;T:,t,A_.-_i!j7,.aI,,_,.r-.T--4� r , #' ' ' C^ F v {--- '` i ; __ ___-----_ ._ _1 ,� h 3� �. _ 5 1 L f �' / . a x .i i a -a , , A:. .. / >..... - .,. . / ( '._« . ti «t .'. a ,.t. «. _, kL�r fi '•.�.:� , rT•. y -9.. :. , .. :vk° 1,,, .a a s 6 .n , ,€.: m' 'n.''^ ., si° -fi` s.t•`" ,.:,q., +1Y' x ;"'! kt A C A A YbRT ., ,, . .. , ... ' .. w , Vf a t x .- ��A- L 4g� • i "�a r .•5.. va xx t . b't`. \ s .,..-.yd., .. •.., "' x. . . aK « 'Y •e.-S'4; ' ` i. y� Y :.1 �,m _ " . .,., - .. 'a. fit.., , • :. ,.... _, ,x. s. s '.rar ., _-. rs. r '�! .a 5 , i P ., • . 3 F"L. . ..r' ..v it l/" i r t,.. //''��ffww//// ,.r..', , -:'.'s/'• #' �" S .$,,;: .r► t : 7 Im....,.-I.-.I*...I.11 I.I.".,1I.I..":5._..M_-.*S..- -.._I..I*.....�.�.1I�,...,;�.I.*1I 4_�\(.Q�1_�1 N---,.��)�r4I�,&,I.-_,.)"..4.,%I,.,,r I3,.1.,V\_.N--I.._�_-,.%)I,J(4_-_.!I-1 I.s-?.I**.4I Z(4k T-_.4.,f 4 I_-s/.�0-,I a�_.':.,0s7-4-*..I.1I:I I,4 I 1I.p.,I,I 1 A...II'�-I1 I.-00._u......,.4-,T'l,-. -I;"0%!I I".Ia`i-,-.;wN T,.-;I ."_ZMI 0'.-�--_._0�.19.10�8 9"t_...-�-M6l,%%I-l�V6.-�lG\',�!I.-.&0.4a,0't.-.)4 I.�—.-!:IP 6IINI.--.;4.'*,I.v�1--I 1-1�-v,_-.,0,I(.l_-�'..o--I-I,I_.Ife_-...Ti.I ,f..;.0 m 6,_e....'..I.I..,-,.I t I�r 0-I I.....--,.i,I7.--�--I.;,LI1;,1-I/--,--i-..r 1...�1`l\,.1 r,1d..I.II I-.%--.,...ccI .0-I k-i7-I--t-,_---..*.-'I.1,.�(c-0W_-,I-.=4(-4'�,-0.",I._o-,,.t.,a,1/)(,��I..I.�.,'II�F".0_,-,.A.I-*�.II-I�I.�;I,,":4,_r—,I I.I a-/-�__t",,1'.:.,4 1.-:.0-i.,5m_\-./.�----I-.--.'-1 1-�--, --R,7A,-0',k.,.f,-./-f.I.1I.I I1.0!;,I II.,I;-J.-7-..,-.-IlI.r lI/.;.--_.'--_..'1.-.I 1—.I-,I-:,II x'�..—,..-W,,.,-:z,'...3I.---4*.4,,.I,.-._.(i_--.i�o 9_-—.�.I.I I -I I..I��I,_;I 0--.I,;o�,I-,m I_.--#-1..;4,._Ia-,-7,I;l;7 V�"Do-N�`Z,'".l,,._--_lb'4_._-.:m_=_..-w,�,._..4"-m,.-,._1.-"r—,.i'_Ii,_?.7mI6I s f.-j-m-Io_,-,Z""-.:III.e�-j,-�!-_,!.I.:I.,:A-.I;_,:g,-f/,"_I",/**:,1,.E"-t 1 I.1-:,.�.,A,_-*.I-,-I lII,II Ii IiI I I"o.-'I-,-1w.'. ,..'.�-_-.,-_4.'---I.._1.'._f-,7I..I\1 i_:I,I.--..\:z I;__I-_I..14_4 IlI-.l-f�.j--7.!,_-!I_Iif,I'X.-__,7.""TFi,:,;-d,.1'..,r-_-v,,.,.Z"I,-m_v,_I.IA.I,*_�".--I0I..,.5,'.�*....L,I_-F,7I...,..,Ta,,I_....;._.-*._2�I r_"*..,I..`.,.� �e--.-I.i%I-:I.,A0,IIIIII#I 4,._11.I I:.I.-�I.,I..`I---,f!(t;n,-I l...,,.,,.I ls,I,l.4I-.-_�;,,�.-I.r�..*.-"'_--i._'-01_,,-p,r-,(`/-�3,-,_p,,".%�,�:4,_,0.,I;�+*4.&I-.,1.I o_II�--.z AI.4;1;,I..I".-/o V4 A0.../*_.,Ic-.�_I VAIV,-,,=.,,�-�".-._.--..l-1I--l-...",I-.-I0-_4-,...r,—\,'1,",r..,IV.I..,4%*--;;I I,"1.`.I I-`.-".-,�._4 :,I"--,7�.-I[,T��I,:,/,.-II j.-I, 3$I 7,0�.�,',I 7.-..*,�-i-,4.;.7II.I,5.t 4 xI-.T-.1-.1.,I-).e,,,+Ri 4o.i6I.. _I—\..!�1...6..._,_I1'-...I.� -.1..1---.i"1 i,....w,II_I,I C,0%I ia�II.I=I--I.-QI-1_0to`.4%_1T I II._,�I-,f 6-1:�,$,�i_�,I�I.v_.11 I.j,1AI,v'1t.--� 11.-._�I._,Qh,jIII;i!II-IiIIIii II.I,... I/_�.I I46_,Atf-I_-.l�,.'\c,'d�,"._I4 t._,,,�"I,4%.--.�,:I.f_.,.'q I/..1,II.1.I 1�A-".I_I.W"1,,,I:E,.I.Z*,.-�7 t-.4.,,-6ar A,z.._"_I 1.I-.IV 1-4I.;I..I..,o-_I,_l.O—1I t-,t_,_.'-I 7 I-.._I-1I-s�.,;�I,,._ .i. -�,.._-�...O,.f.-_M—., 4-wA,I.).h.''_0 i'AoIL t R-i1',I:w a�.,II.1�.I V iI;;1;iiI I!I-l*.II-_-.I �i I o.i.5A r-1�'.I4_..20�v,--1.\."._"r_,1-".0.—,.-i,__ od—I mrr/,I%o__I,i.I1_:IIp k—I-',I"_l i c\,L_4.-1/1�,t--_;/f,?/II�-../w I I I I...,_5., I,1_-\.1,'l:—-ii-,x,r.i.(-NI v I,..-i--.1- // J al..,. ,x-' 'I>. t/ . Ol . { �Q ♦ I.. ,*,�., ^..... r_,�. ' l \ _,.� .0 \ G t.� � , L �ItoKl-OI.A9-,._.7 I�:",I,...-.——wI\I;-..,.-N,.*I!��4_-.-,--l T i 1 T.-%.d_.._I0�.p0.-.lI.lk._.(.I-io*iJ I.---.k I,'k-�4-'I'/.A_,—l:ai.._—----.II I�71--_----i1-.I1.1 z-.I.+II.-rIII.Ii....- ,-_.<�1—I<,_,�I I.Ia l,"Z,a l,_�Z.�7�1-_-.1.n-,\I.-��II.�,0I-) e / a :. . I . Z_ .. V _\ '`+ - Awe. F. _ _- sn 1 O 4 - ' ' 1, M = • -- - �w 4 --�-----T--_..,,��.- .'I _ �_I �T . - . � , PROPOSED M,4�ON�PY _ t i -� 5 _ F 33 , 5 _ - - ,- � J ' yY4zZ �;: PROPOSED OPEN/NGS - _--- {. } kf I ( /N N'.4LL FOR D�P.4/i1'.4GE ��J - - �"' Y Y' 'b t. .. ..r ... I __- _ --�• �C.y 'T M * - , ` # - N /y - 40.J y w//7 y .1. i _ ♦ c• i 'f *'p I S . r : .;i 4 A'• I , �. Il h 1!! , � ' . i ' - } l' ► '+ - ". . !,i �li s.#K'. i .A. i A. - t " S P % _ . ". . • • LEGEND - - I A ES NATURAL CONTOUR 1,i 1..t.,l-Y p�-,-.,,,.LI,,,:%..41-I:" -r-"(_.,,tI,1,�",,I,:.I�.I4-,..*I:,:1;.f*,,s, .:�,II:Ik,I".�.�I.1'.�,"IL�,:1 f.1 I1.".-",1 1 I 1,4,J.._l.If',,.1-.'sI,I 1,I_,,tI_.l:,...,.�*,j,_,',.I_.,,�w I�1 I..IJ_.'f.l,�1..Iz�4.,4.�,�,-I--r'..'.I,.-IL.,":4.-,1,-I1�%"I-,I';I'.I-I.*'I., ..I I%"-,�.''A',"I,,..II*�11"4 1":.4...1.�l11IoI_,,4.:_,.II.-'_..,I,4.-.l--.1.",-:.WI,1 I....-*ll ter. l (��> I N D C T "-.-....,A_1 Y-....I6,.I k.'AI 4,I.o_4 J,I-1"W77.I I..r I,,_%VW._.._5- --L��-�4. y :w� .'w .• �,;ET+,._ rr%. - .,\ y� f/P INDICATES HIGH POINT ' t . I .. srur�iet ` •• '" F�' I ND1 GATES FLOW LINE r ; ,.Wit- �H es o - ' •- - 'b . .,,r1,..!..-,1._"'-�..0-I-4,.,..:,...- Pa,�.,I..._). `i-%.--..:%1.I1I.*.Im.:..I-:.,..,,I--".!;"....:..7_._...*....I-,,4..:M"....I...-**...I.-.�."......,,......n-I".I,... i� ,. .•L_ r'.• ,t... ....., FS. INDICATES FINISHED SCIKFACE . 0' —...-,I,,.-,%._, INDICATES FINISHED FLOOR 11 �,�, •.. ... .. - ' 6.B CKADE BREAK .l.-,--...).,a7 Ij.,*.I.l 'iN ••.. INUICATES �, y� �•- ,, -. ' -: 1: :ugywl - ` ;,- _•�. - 1ND1CA'1'ES FLOW LINE A- .�� '� - . _,.E R - - -- _- -- - - N �jg` _ ', 2D 'i2M '; LNU1CAi'ES FLOW DIKECTIO ,. 11 I. '� r, . I= - - - . & 1 INVESTOKS , x •�^ ow,v - - 4ti�. ` � - REPAREQ r)F': r T Te T '/ r 7 ->.� _r :: •. • . .. .:;: `. tiU 7'UWN (� �.UUN7 Y k0AD €r • �,� .' t„ __� •' # BE � � MARK A r ' .r.!• _• - �� - UKANGE , ; AL I FORM 92268 1—,4'QCT ,y° /9.5T5 '� ::J`�t--' - . lr►�' J. � '_s• , „ / CHISLED "X" ON TOP *1 NUT WARNER ENGINFEgINV ( , � lr„ .'xs..::oaQ r Sf :...� ..'.• -� 1 1 4 9 7 3 12 0 ,;, ' -'� r. - , - _-,, . ON SOUTH S D 1 ' _ - �•• -_�, I E OF FI>at CIVIL ENGINEERING __ • = 28 ' NORTH EAST OF ' ' . • "`' �,77 Pailn ert .�,. �_ . HYDRANT _ CATALI NA d� SAN RAFAEL LAND SURVEYING .. ELEVATION 19�3 . 91 -J,_ PRE�IMINARI' DRAINhGE d GRADFNG PLAN ',Ij._..I.1 I I.-.i-I;X,I1I I.,,1"-�II,II,.II,,1_,,1 1 1,1�lI I1I�;1.i, j',.;A,1I'!.,:1,..I.I,"I-._0-,l-1fI1�,;1�I.1,�_0",,,t-.''I'.",.I,:VI,,I�t.%,II.�o`.I ICI"t,0,.1.11.I,e",-�l1I-.(,II5-III-..It I:,r?1,.$�1:I.%,.'lf"14J I1i4i.tAV..I.I,,.t�`4I I,.4:.I-t.,I 1.'-T..M..,,.t r,I,-lz,.l,.I I fI.,,,4:I"aII,IJ I.,_.Ik-,1,_l,�f'..f'�l'i-Ik,,I,,I,_.,"I",,-X.-I-",_,..;I,.;,,I,I*�.rII.,,I---I.r.,.$1�_*.<,. I.,"-'I1,Apl-:i1 t,1,.i0._,#.1I.1"t I".I:-II._,I;,t',":II1,,"�f��l..,,-'1.I 0I,.,_�I1N,.,.t"':.I1,-:.-:;��I"`I.III-I-,4A'I-�#'j 1,l.,,I.o-1 w",4.,'.-.,-,ol"..t.l,,4.:,j..I".�I.1 Itl_.,",,I�I:11,iI.l,,(*.I1..i1.4.L,I,..4,',.i,1.I1,-"-', ,,l I.I.I V,I-,.,,.i.�"0��-1 p,%.,,,I`,17.t I.',,p;.'t-,.*..I,,1��".'j0 1*I,..,,$A.,,,.,I-'-'I_1,;f,_. 3 �f'/C/N/TY dh'c.4 OR,�4�N,46f' i1�1,4P i,$ s•-�" ,:. •gas :OSNUA LANE. SUITE A __-. . #� ?, r �UGCP VALIEV. CALIFORNIA 9?2R4 MARK DESCRIPTION GATE DATE DRAwN eY: D.R SCALE: i"-t0' $ � SHEETS j'v � j' Tc� �ssns R E Y l S ( 0 N S DATE PRINTED: W.O. No, �"Oj`Gf �II . � a .: • „ .. yt. . r w3 _w► YR. r4 _ I.P � h IN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT'. BEING A PROPOSED ONE LOT SUBDIVISION FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES ON LOT N0 . 15 , BLOCK 6 , PALMA VILLAGE UNIT NO . 5 , M . B . 20 , PG , 40 - 41 , RIVERSIDE COUNTY SEPTEMBER , 1983 OWNER & SUBDIVIDER : 1 & l INVESTORS c / o J . N . EWART , JR . 890 TOWN & COUNTRY ROAD /0 �,2 W,,4TEfT' /Yf4/11/ ORANGE , (-AI. I FORK I A 92668 t� Op E N G I N E E R . _ � .__, `N -- 2_ _ _ - _ _ _ Aq.� --Z1 - - -o .. WARNER ENGINEERING ( V -- ----- __-- - 1 \ O 7245 JOSHUA LANE ,, SI IT);' A - - -- --- - _ _ -- - - - - ---`- -- _. ._ . .- -- --- - - - �.- YUCCA VAI.LEY . CALIFORNIA 92284 ILI V i UTILITY COMPANIES : SOUTHERN CAL I FORN I A E.DI SON CO . 74000 HIGHWAY 1I1 V DESERT ,FRT C.ALI FORIv lA 92260 r , a .... .. I *'. : �. _... <-. ..♦ .. .,_:. .. i -..,,' -. .$` ,. ,-:. r, .. .,F ,,.. -..-,.. M ... ... gip. .__.. .. 7"..,% ., .'- .,Y SOTH ;RN CALIFORNIA lA ( AS, O4 46123 TOWN A V E?�L 'E �. t I '�DlO , CALIFORNIA 9Z �01 Q _ C( }I F 1 i A .�'A .( 1"ZI T . V ._ _ _ .. . I 4f f _ '- .:..;;, -:: ";.:-• ' 'c ' S': e:a y" 7�' , ��""a.': ,-ti t 0 a�a` �:. OX y[ ,.- o- PALM �E S 3 T 8 �'AA "� �'Otrt��i�Y q Z 2 b�3�} v. i r �, - E, ... 7 ' A M ) S 'I � WA"l . D}.E'ARTMFN"I 1 � r j F M P . O . R() i E _ _�� -� z� ✓f p 1. {� !'Alai U( F I< I ( i ? ! F( h N I A �)"? o _ - ,F N F. A? IFI E P H O `F. C - t 1, o ram,•_ � • Y' ; �•e '� '� +Z•D �o � �., E3lo �� ',.� ,.,. _, ., �-•-+�' �j ti H- 9 r> 1 R L I S S S'I k E f•: I. t �\O - ✓ C �i 1. [. . Cow * 1 ' \� j INDIO , CAI.IFORNIA 92201 X 0� NN z - TEN T. TR• /95 75 a NOTES : PQ� 1 _ APPROX I MAI F ACREAGE : 0 . 51 ACRFS NET + 2 ) EXIS-I ING i AND PROPOSED ) LAND USES �w rj NORTH : RESIDENTIAL. �- ✓ '� SOUTH : RF.S I DENT I AI. o QvE I EAS1 VACAN1 ( RFSIDFN'IIAL ) �0 N WEST : RESIDENTIAL SOURCE OF WATER SUPPLY : PALM DESER'I ' WATER DEPARTMENT A .VO 9C4C e PAS P1� µ ► MFTHOn OF SEWAGE DI SPOSAI : ,SEPTIC TANK AND SEEPAGE PITS 5 ) EXISTING AND PROPOSED ZONING : R-2 9747E yrci�rTr WR - — - a -- 4 I N THE CITY. OF' PALM DESERT BEING A PROPOSED OIINE LOT SUBDIVISION FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES ON LOT NO . 15 , BLOCK 6 P A L M A VILLAGE UNIT NO . 5 . M . B . 20 , PGS + 40 - 41 , RIVERSIDE COUNTY SEPTEMBER , 1993 I, r _ �b , ` OWNER & SUBDIVIDER : J & ! INVESTORS N . FWARI .1 R . 890 TOWN & COUNTRY ROAD /d +r W4TER /l,-f,4 / ORANCF , CAI- 1FORNIA 92668 0 . _ E N G I N E E R . _ _ T __�.. _ _ �.. __ _ _----- - . - - - _ - WARNER ENGINEERING �� m 4 5 H)SHUA I_ ANE SL'T TE A t�' _ - - - - -- --- - -- - - 1 CCA VALLEY . CAI. I FORN I A 92284 iia F UTILITY _COMPANIES ^' h S r�L/E SOUTHERN (:AI.IFORNIA E:DISON 'CO ; - ' r .._ ,, . . 74000 HIGHWAY III y P M SE T CAI, 9�2 I A U. . _ 3 _ f _ t :,�.:. ... .._ ... _ :--. . ...,,.. ... ._. .. ..: �V _.... ,:..-. .. ` r . h S T F CALIFORNIA GA. C .� 1 � 3 TCwh AVE 'vlE I N D I U , CALIFORNIA 9 2 2()l .� > \I , ' I. :, f s _ °"•, 3$ �a s..` P 0 . SOX 3 6 H + r .;#_^ _ ��- ,':r ?:.. ., ¢ ,�.,..• a *,_. 2 .yam g :. &-, .sue . ;.f t �..' ',§ :s;'�... r 2 A M DE RT ALI R 6� 9"P t FO I A U :• _ 15) PALM D� R•1 WA T F R D E.P A KI1 E N, , �� ' - -`�� •.,+'--_�-,.. •- � �� i PA1. F' R`I -'At 1F(�KNIA 92260 �� \\ - v..... ' . 1'��r is ? 7 f' k _t_ � -�„ ��,��_.' .,a .r_ ('I-tiF_RA ] I�1:1.E LHONE CO . \ . �p!. a 5 - ,5,, n y�� I R L I S� S 1 R F El`,C�� •'��. <'oJ� •ti. 5�,, j INI) IO , CAI IFORNIA 92201 TENT• TA? 10525 NOTES : k 1 J APPROXIMATE A( R FAG F. U . 51 ACRES NF'I 2 1 EX I ST I NG ( AND PROPOSED i LAND E5� NORTH : RES I DENT I AI- C)�- SOUTH : RES I DFN"I LAI. 41 A4 EAST : VACANT ( RES IDFNTIAL ) WEST : RES I DENT I Al. �P 3 ► SOURCE OF IIATFR SUPPLY : PALM DESERT WATER DEPARTMENT NO •9CA4e 4 ► METHOD OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL : SEPTIC TANK AND SEEPAGE PITS 5 ) EXISTING AND PROPOSED ZONING : R-2 r STATE NAyY Ili Welly/Tr M,�P ' _ _ IN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT ' BEING A PROPOSE [ ( NE LOT SUBDIVISION FOR C0NP0MINILIM PURPOSES ON I0T NO , 15 . B 1 0 C K 6 , PALMA VILLAGE UNIT NO , 5 , M , B £ 20 PG , 40 - 41 , RIVERSIDE COUNTY SEPTEMBER , 1983 OWNER $ _ SUBDIVIDER : --- -- --- - - - ----- 1 & I N\'F:S'I ORS t, c / c, J . N . EWAR1 , JR . 89() TOWN & COUNTRY ROAD /+� lNQT�f� t1�•;i,4/ ORANGE , CALIFORNIA 92668 19 00/• ENGINEER _ . --_ _ --_- ------ - . :_—-- � - W A K \F R ENGINEERING 0 ___ _ 1 _ .- -- 7"245 JOSHUA LANF , S-VITE A - - -- - - -- - - - - - - _ -r _ --- - -- - - Yt'CCA VA11,FY , C'A1, IF0RN1A 9 2riIf. t n _max: s;f� >• I � � � •. /�� a . a r f v> AID' UTILITY COMPANIES 74000 HIGHWAY 111 ; a a SOt "IHERN CALIFORNIA FDISON } • <. V PALM DE.. CALIFORNIA 91226 , f qq.. _ .: -.: ., .._-.✓ ,: R' ... ,. ... 'fS. _ �. r. .- t. d � s _. .- ..,r".i -:. >- :. .. t.. .. n t.'M1....v.. t. t. r.-. .< ... ..-. Y a , - .. ..,.._✓, u._ ,:' - . .- ., a ",,.. , n.:a _.. ..,.' :x. „ ... .....�: iw.. .- :. : .„r A .. .-.. ,. ..._ .{-.-„-. f.,. ,. .- .. .,. .,. ::> _. �'.. ._ _ - .. -... Ike+. ., ... -T ... _ ,. .,: ,.-.-. [• HERD A .I F ��, ,. r _. _ , r . .., ., _ < • . t ( I ORNIA CA, Cb f Y _ > . 46 3 W AV ., I2 IOW, EIvt E f A � LO'I f ♦\ ,,., ....ram, l..,....'# R,. r t...,. ., a:+,' Y , ..:. _x.,.. •Y'a;:, ^,» t. r' ts.... ::, T I � / = - � - I :• , , , r.. .-�- � :., ., .. .. <: I iv D i 0 CALIFORNIA 92261 r _OACHELI A '.'A 1.i E 1 T . rl _ a (• :• ;. r: :.9 •'II• pa -� x tip. sR t, a n ,, •4: d 1 .4'Y ,tR.- x:�. PAI. DESERT C�t�I P(iRi } 4� Cit ' � � • - / � '/:� � VA F K {)E FAR'IMF-"�'1 or 'S B 0\ f, � `� �0 . � �n� ,r ..-�.. �� r ."' _ := _1•-� '' � ALM I)F FR I (',11 I F0KN 1 r G F:N F R A I •1 E:1 F_ PH()N F. CO . CJ ?s2901 BLISS S'I RFF: I O � � �� ` ��4. Co•� �" INDIO , CAI. ] FORMA 92201 `? 'v i t y; z-- TENTa 7A /9575 `JI � Y 3 v NOTES : s� �QPh 11 APPROXIMAIE ACREAGE : 0 . 51 ACRES NET G2a R f FXISTINC ( AND PROPOSED ) LAND USES : Pooi �p� D" SOI1TT : RESIDENTIAL N : RES I DF\'I' I AI.O wE ! FAST : VACANT ( RESIDENTIAL ) WEST : RESIDENTIAL GPaL0 ND 9CAGE 3 ) SOURCE OF WATER SUPPLY : PALM DESERT WATER DEPARTMENT �/DLO �p� 4 ) 'METHOD OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL : SEPTIC TANK AND SEEPAGE PITS /� 5 ) IXISTING AND PROPOSED ZONING : R-2 i 57.47E NwY 0 Wellt//TY WR s5:b T AE`a 5 -R' •c .)cad,: I ' j I MR z IN ; THE CITY OF PALM DESERT 1 BEING A PROPOSED ONE SOT SUBDIVISION FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES ON LOT NO . 15 , BLOCK 6 , PALMA VIILA. GE UNIT N0 . 5 , M , B , 20 , PGS , 40 - 41 , RIVERSIDE COUNTY SEPTEMBER , 1983 OWNER & S U B P I V I D E R J & I 1 ti I ORS r / - J . N . F-WART , JK . 890 TOWN' & ('OL'NTRY kQAU ORANGE , CALIFORNIA 92668 A � y - A { 2 - - . / -�� W A R h E R E NR _7 _ 7_ 1( S H 1 A L A R E�C SUITE A , YUCCA VALLEY , CALIFORNIA 92284 3 1 ' UTILITY COMPANIES : ' r Q SOIIHFRN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO . g X. , r HIGHWAY 111 • .... K.. ... ...,, ,..T.. w +., ..+.. b -« V 1 y PA DE. _ - _ a z .. _ .. .. .�_ . ,. _ V, G .� , _ , � CALIF R SO -THERN CALIFO NIA GAS YS, ....: ,-. .. .. . +.. .: x .. ,. •. ,.. < : "'� .. ..... ..,. x..4 .. F 7EN74- T111E TI?A C 7 Al /u' 15 ;7u5 t 4 � �. .. .. < 51: 3 TOWN A v>;r�t E. . h _ - I DIO , CAI I F , -_-..., , 5` ,u, a,.R�:.....h^r ..... �,mx ..- _ � f. � -: ', st`, .ro � W - � � � � � + '� ai �. .� � 'p'^«'.+ --�" -� _ --. ..'_y � �1t'l,.LH�' !-1 :1 1.'_.�. I i V�� T_:ti' _ _ __ � -�,w'"�a:,•: �a z- -� , .,9 .: — (� a r • F ST21 I 4 u.. „ ( ;V I R 2 ) , �4 0 6( • ' �.� �, E..OI 51 i.�,�^� fit)XI k'I I '.A'I F R I) PAR'1 MF:NJ i I'AI.M DE:SF R 1 ( ,�f 1 F( Rti I A U ' F,t, Z0z� �:~ ��,.:' r,,�., i . S' i (,FF N E:R A 1, 1.1-.1 I- P f i()N E i _ n2y�� 1 BLISS S'lRI'F1 INI) Il) , CALIFORNIA y2 �?(� l �c 4cE -24 21 ;r6-A1T. 7A /9575 a � Q NOTES : APPROXIMATE ACREAGE: : 0 . 51 ACRES NET coQ� Q� EC,E ' i EXISTING ( AND PROPOSED ) LAND USES : NORTH : RES I DENT I Al- AV SOUTH : RESIDENTIAL NN EAST : VACANT ( RESIDENTIAL ) R�� N WF-S'I : RE:SIDENTIAI- GP ND 9J1AG� 3 SOI'R( E OF WATER SUPPLY : PALM DESERT WATER DEPARTMENT P � u ) METHOD OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL : SEPTIC 'IANK AND SEEPAGE PITS S ) EXISTING AND PROPOSED LON 1 NC : R-1 5747E Nstiy �r l�/eMll TY /YI,gP ' 3. -.�"1" : %a _.., .::.K� t ,.,. -- •. e „ „ ::��......r> ... Y, t '.,. 3 .-,;. 5 r %3i •��r;-.y ro,c „fa .y,. i. ;.,.:.. .. •t, � ' .' IN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT BEING A PROPOSED ONE LOT SUBDIVISION FOR CONU0MINIUM PURPOSES ON LOT N0 , 15 , BLOCK 6 , PALMA VILLAGE UNIT N0 . 5 , 'M , B , C , PGS , 40 - 41 , RIVERSIDE COUNT' SEPTEMBER , 1 Q83 ~ OWNER & SUBDIVIDER : J & J 1N%'ESTORS c / o J . N . FWAR"I , JR . 890 TOWN & CO'UNTRY ROAD 0 ��T-�R lkf.4//v � ORANGE , CALIFORNIA 92668 E N G I N E E R RNER ENGINEERtNG .0 7A45 JOSHUA LANE , SUITE A I - f-- - - \ 1 l'CCA VAl 1,EY . CAI. I F 0 R N I A 42 ? 84 UTILITY COMPANIES (� E=. 5OUIHFRN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO . �It, �,/�� 74000 HIGHWAY III PALM DESERT , CAI I FORK I A 9 26(1 SOL 'I HFRN CALIFORNIA CAS { O . Q nr p� i0� 46123 'TOWN AVENUE V , � .. - '"-� Z I NDI O , CALIFORNIA 92201 h h 3 ti=, ._ - r � "a n- - :-. . C i t 1 1 �" ::. 75 P E'i 7 1 EL AS O P . O . BOX 368 �') PALM DESERT . CALIFORNIA 42260 PALM 1)FSF:R I WA1 ER DF:PAR'IMFN'I ' � • �-. / ,' -_ ";�Ol �jf P . O . Box 1ht PALM DESFR I CA1 I F(1RNIA y2260 1%. ;� `t. ` " ttr` �./ G E N E R A I. T E l.F PHONE C O . K1 901 RI_ ISS STREF'I INDIO , Al( IFORNIA 9 201 i - TEA/T- 7-A /9575 a ll NOTES �Q 1 APPROXIMATE: ACREAGE : 0 . 51 ACRES NET Qti S4� 4 2 !•XIS1 ING ( AND PROPOSED ) LAND USES : c�v ` 5✓ NORTH : RESIDENTIAL SOUTH : RESIDENTIAL �,vt �` _ FAST : � ACAN"T ( KES I DENT1 AL ) t�-FST : RESIDENTIAI. SOURCE OF WATER SUPPLY : PALM DESERT WATER DEPARTMENT GP NO 9G'-4CE AL II, 4 ) METHOD OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL' : SEPTIC TANK AND SEEPAGE PITS P5 ) EXISTING AND PROPOSED ZONING : R- STATE Ni✓y �� TEN, TA 711E Ti ) ?A� C IU95 75 1 0 eX a !/reek(//T P i� Y M.4 x , w , a§ 3 I i _-. _,.-. .,.:. 'r-• _♦,..: � ... ,.. v ..'�:-..-. ,,, .� F ,_,; av>�`. •: '�,r';,: haw ��';` - e.'Na, - s-.as�;�';: :h,.:n Y : ` m Z I � ,I, "v. .z-.. ,:.a ., e. :..._ � . _...:. .... -.Ass.. -l' G. :. , ♦„ s;- . - + 33yy !. .r_.. :.r .. ..> - _- _... a r-.-.. t,.�_.s ... •v. {.. .-. ._.. _.,-,....y, a .: .. ,�. .... : _ _,. _. ,, -.. -�..,, ... ,�.:, -.. ....,. - _. e, - <... :._•..�a .:,, ,.' _. -_.. -... ,� - :�[,. _. �^ ,.. - r <e ,., ,.. -. a ,. ,..:.. x .r '�.- r .. _. Y�. $ , '^ ♦ { ....' � k'. .::,. .- .. -..-. ,. ,: s , y. r, ,,,„s ...... .«,: „ ,: ::., . �-.•: ..,: - : .. �, a d,x.:,, 7 6 « W. if • r 1 - IN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT BEING A PROPOSED 0'NE LOT SUBDIVISION FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES ON LOT NO , 15 , BLOCK 6 , PA1_ M.A VILLAGE UNIT NO , 5 , M . :Bb 20 , PGS . 40 - 41f RIVERSIDE COUNTY SEPTEMBER , 1983 OWNER & SUBDIVIDER : ---- ------------ -- ,I & J INVESTORS c /o J . N . EWART , JR . 990 TOWN & COUNTRY ROAD /0 �Qi A14TER /Y1,4/l1/ ORANGE: , CALIFORNIA g266� 0 4 — - ` ENGINEER .,.. �_ -- --' --- ----�'=-- ---:_�--:_::Y�'-- = -- •._- -� --'^-' ----- _�._;..—.-- - -` �- `- _ _--_._.. . ,� � WARNER E N G I �E R I N C i t c> 7245 JOSHUA LANE , SPITE A - --- t 1l ( ( A VAC.LEY CALIFORNIA 92284 AI UTILITY COMPANIES : SOUTHERN CALI FORN IA EDI SON CO . 74000 HIGHWAY III Q PA M DESERT, CAI. I FORN I A 92260 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO . � 01 l _ /Z4I.,0� 461 .. 3 TOWN AVENUE " LLB • -' 1NDIO , CALIFORNIA 92201 �' � � \� � \�� •'� »� �� "i++�"` Sic �(� . �.z ; - ;•. .C U A C H F:L L A V A L L F Y T . V . .W {. _.. --»,.. _--.-.-: �. _. _ � _,: - ,. .,..>:- .. :. �a_« .. S,P:. - .>y.,. x ...T:a4!"Y.S..,. ,..:.,..+k!,>,.R'd�: ...:-..: x;_.... ...u... -n r� -,.-.I{�_. �`. -•�'' _ ., ��;:... -.. '�;. •,•;. ,. \ .' .,$'ax..s. M'.m+t§roa+>.''ry,:,y' ,"$'^_ r ..:" '.:. ��. *_ r P' '*- .'',+.} '•� - d.... \ e. ., 1 \ ....yw ^.-..R _ 7 _ _ . � , -- "' 4 l / 7 F-I I'A F P . O BOX 366 W} =� � / 1'AI_M DESERT a CALIFORNIA 92260 �i - I j'z l 5J PALM DESERl WAT ER 1)E1)ARTMFN1 „ A • �` O ' P . O . BOX 1 6 1 t v } `� �___� ' • /' zo1. 5�/ � ' PALM DESERT , CALIFORNIA 92260 ♦� , ., +,�pl. �Dio �� '� ., G F N E R A I. T F I.E P H O N E C O . 7 I BLISS STREET 7= \DIO , FORNIA 92 2( 1 z — TEA/T. 7A /9 5 7:5 el NO ', ES �P 11 - APPROXIMATE ACREAGE : 0 . 51 ACRES NET EXIST ING ( AND PROPOSED ) LAND 1`SES : G `'oQCQ �p� C CJG NORTH : RES I DFNT I A1. rV SOUTH : RFS I DFN'I IAI. o Avt ! FAST : 'L'ACANT ( RES I DENT I AL ) WFS'I : RESIDENTIAL LO 3 ) SOURCE OF WATER I1UPPI+Y : PALM DESERT WATER DEPARTMENT No 911 ALE + � METHOD OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL : SEPTIC LANK AND SEEPAGE PITS P5 ) EXISTING AND PROPOSED ZONING : R-2 a W 7 N Y STA E '- TEA41TA 111E Ti�?Av C T A� 15575 i ll/Cllf//TY 04R _ ,,