Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTT 20024 HDP 84-2 HIGHWAY 74 WEST SIDE/HOMES 1988 PRECISE PLAN TENTATIVE TRACT (2Q_7_,(1 ZONES CHANGES _ PARCEL MAP--- - VARIANCE C.UTI. - -- � C REFFI? TO: APPLICANT ! i , �f <� fYl N L.00A f ION : _ REQUEST:- EXISTING ZONE: mTTf PREPARATION PROGRESS DATE: BY COMMENTS APPLICATION RECEIVED LEGAL PUBLICATION SENT NOTICES SENT FIELD INVESTIGATION DEPTS. NOTIFIED BUILDING ENGINEERING FIRE_ POLICE RECREATION & PARKS SCHOOL DISTRICT DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS _ FLOOD CONTROL PRELIMINARY MEETING _J7 __STAFF REPORT L !r&z FINAL PLAN APPROVAL _PRECISE PLAN (6) LANDSCAPING PLAN (5) PLAN. DIRECTOR MOD. (6) HEARINGS & ACTIONS p' DATE ACTION VOTE REVIEW BOARD HEARING P.C. HEARING PUBLISHED P.C. PUBLIC HEARING APPLICANT NOTIFIED C.C. PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE NO. RESOLUTION NO. CCCCt^TI\/C nATC MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNI]NG OC+aSSIC N MEETING TUESDAY, JULY 5, 1988 ADbU]NISTRATIVE FENCE ROOM 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE NO STUDY SESSION WAS FIELD. I. Carr• TO ORDER Chairman Erwood called the meeting to order at 6:59 p.m. II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Commissioner Downs led the Pledge of Allegiance. III. ROLL CALL Members present: Rick Erwood, Chairman Bob Downs Faith Ladlow Jim Richards (absent at roll call) Carol Whitlock Members Absent: None Staff Present: Ray Diaz Kandy Allen Phil Drell Joe Gaugush Phil Joy Steve Smith Ruthie Worthy IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Chairman Elwood advised the commission that June 21 minutes are not available for approval and suggested we move on to the consent calendar. V. C CNSENT CALENDAR A. Case No. PMW 88-9 Neufeld, applicant Property is located 618 feet north of Country Club Drive and 1,326.78 feet east of Cook Street. Request is to increase parcel to 10 acres B. Case No 20024-time m�ct�ion Applicant is requesting a one-year time extension for an eight lot subdivision in the Hillside Planned Residential zone west of Palm Valley Channel and the So mmerset Condominium development. MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING CCt4.aSSION JULY 5, 1988 C. Case No. PMW 88-8 Waring Place Applicant is requesting minor lot line adjustments to coincide with wall installations. Chairman Erwood stated these items are normally considered routine and asked if there were any comments from the members of the commission regarding items on the consent calendar. Action Moved by Commissioner Downs, seconded by Commissioner Whitlock, approving consent calendar by minute motion. Carried 3-0, with Chairman Erwood abstaining and Jim Richards absent at the time the vote was taken. VI. PUBLIC BEARINGS A. CONTINUED CASE NO. CUP 88-2 - SCHMITZ ENTERPRISES, INC., Applicant Request for approval of a conditional use permit and development agreement to construct a 17-unit senior citizens' apartment project in the R-2, S. 0. zone, on the south side of Santa Rosa Way, near San Pascual Avenue. In the applicant's absence, Mr. Diaz recommended that this item be moved to the foot of the calendar as the last public hearing item. B. CASE NO. PP 88-10, C/Z 88-2, GPA 88-2 - COSGROVE, HILL, NILSON AND JENSEN TRUST, Applicant Request for approval of a general plan amendment, zone change, precise plan of design, and negative declaration of environmental impact to allow construction of a 14,600 square foot office structure at the southwest comer of San Luis Drive and Fred Waring Drive, APN 640-121-010 through 014. Phil Joy outlined the the staff report and recommended approval. He added that the surrounding property owners have now cone forward with a petition to make known their concerns. In addition, the applicant's original plan did not include greenbelt, and a later submitted plan does include one. 1 2 CITY OF PALM DESERT MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission FROM: Director of Community v ommua ty Development DATE: July 5, 1988 SUBJECT: TT 20024 - Time Extension Request The applicant is requesting the final time extension for TT 20024 located in the Hillside Planned Residential zone. The tract map is for an eight lot subdivision which was originally approved in 1984, for the subdivision of an 8.24 acre parcel located west of the Palm Valley Channel and south of the prolongation of Mesa View Drive. The proposed subdivision continues to be consistent with the city's adopted general plan and meets the requirements of the HPR zone and for these reasons should be granted. If the time extension is granted, the applicant must file a final map within the next year or the map will expire. 1M.1. D AZ /dlg t 201-B YORBA LINDA BLVD, PLACENTA,CA 92670-3418 714 993 4500 s June 16, 1988 Job No. 349-01-88 Wagner Pacific �1✓ ' 1n'.. IN C O RPO GA I E D l /�{' ;�" ^6'.',.\ CIVIL ENGINEERS Mr. Ray Diaz {)�+[✓���cj'�P��\(lVn�1Y]�N' luyA�� s u a v E v o R s Director of Planning City of Palm Desert JU N 2 0 1989 73-510 Fred Waring Dr. Palm Desert, CA 92260 COMMNNIIIY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY Of PALM DESERT 'Re: Tentative Tract Map No. 20024 Dear Mr. Diaz: on behalf of our client, Southwest Partners, we are hereby requesting approval for the last available 12 month extension of the tentative map. We have been coordinating this extension with Mr. Phil Drell of your office who not only is very knowledgeable concerning the project, but who has also been a big help for our client in planning the project. Should you have any questions, please contact me directly, and thank you for your assistance in this matter. Sincerely, WAGNER PACIFIC, INC. Dana S. Halladay Vice President DSH/jg cc: Richard Howard, Southwest Partners I , 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NOTICE OF ACTION Date: July 9, 1984 Mr. Richard Smith, et al 960 E. Tahquitz-McCallum Way, Suite 201 Palm Springs, CA 92262 Re: HDP 84-2 and TT 20 224 The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of July 3, 1984. Approved by Resolution No. 969 Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the director of environmental services, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. RAMON A. DIAZ, SECRETARY PLANNING COMMISSION RAD/lcr cc: File(s) C.V. Water District PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 969 A RESOLUIION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY Of- PALM DESERT, CAL.JFORNIA, APPROVING A HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT PLAN, I LOT TENTATIVE'_ TRACT MAP, AND NEGATIVE_ DECLARATION OF ENV'IRON.MENTAL. IMPACT, TO ALLOW EIGHT HOaMESITES AND OPEN' SPACE ON 8.24 ACRES GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE PALM VALLEY STORM CHANNEL .ACROSS FRONT 50 .4MERSET CONDO MINILIMS. CASE NO. HDP 84-2 and TT 20024 WHEREAS, the Planning, Commission of the City of Palrn Desert, California, did on the 3rd day of lulu, 1984, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider a request by RICHARD SMITH, et. al., for approval of a Hillside Development Plan, I I lot Tentative Tract Map, and Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact, to allow eight: hornesites and open space on 8.24 acres within the HPR zone generally located on the west side of the Palm Valley Storm Channel across from Sommerset Condoininiums. WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of. the "City of Palm Desert Procedures to Implement the California Environmental Qualitv Act, Resolution No. 80-89", in that the director of enviroat nental services has deterrnined that the project will not have an adverse impact on the environment and a draft Negative Declaration has been prepared. WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimeriy and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said planning romrnission did find the following facts to justify their .actions, as described 'below: 1. The design, Improvements, type of development, and density of the proposed map and hillside development plan are consistent with the State Subdivision Map Act, Palm Desert Subdivision and =oning Ordinance, General Plan, and the West Hills Specific Plan. 2. The design of the Rtbdivision will no' r'su17. in substantial environ,nentat damage, injure fish or wildlife, or result in public health problems. Water, se%ver, and drainage improvement: shall be as approved by the Coachcllis Valley 'Water District, the Riverside County Health Department, and the engineering division of the Palm Desert Department of Public Works. 3. The proposal .611 not conflict with public; easements. 4. The design will allow unrestricted solar access to all lots. NOW, THFR.EFORF, BE IT RF_SOLVFD by the Planninp romrnission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the commission in this case. 2. T`7trt the planning cornmiss'_on does hereby approve the above described Tentative Map No. 20024 exhibit 'A' and HDI' 02-84 exhibit: B' or file in the Depar'rnent of Environmental Services, subject to the attached conditions. 3. That a Negative Der_laratior. of Environmental Impact is hereby approved. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Corn mission, held cn this 3rd day of July, 1994, by thr following vole, t^ .vit: AYES: D(-1)WiJ` , RICHARDS, WOOL:), AND 2RWOOD .N0E.S: NON"E ABSENT: CRII'E ABSTAIN; NONE RICII% ^''S .RWOOD, Vire C.hairrnan ATTEST: - ---- %Urt z 1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 969 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NOS. HDP 84-2 and TT 20024 Department of Environmental Services: 1. The development of the property described herein shall conform to the approved exhibits on file in the Department of Environmental Services in addition to all municipal ordinances, state and federal statutes now in force or which hereafter may be in force. 2. The applicant shall have twenty-four (24) months frorn the date of the approval or conditional approval of the tentative map for filing of the final map unless an extension of time as permitted by code is granted by planning commission. 3. All on-site utilities, including cable TV, shall be placed underground and shall be completely concealed from view except certain appurtenances as may be approved by the director of environmental services. 4. All dedicated land and/or easements required by this approval shall be granted to the City of Palm Desert, or other appropriate agency, without cost and free of all liens and encumbrances. 5. The CC&R's for this development shall be submitted to the director of environmental services for review and final approval by the city attorney prior to the issuance of any building permits. Prior to recordation of the final subdivision map, the applicant shall submit to the city engineer: a. The document to convey title. b. Covenants and restrictions to be recorded. C. Management and maintenance agreement to be entered into with the owners of the units of the projects. 6. Prior to submittal of the final map, the applicant shall provide the department of environmental services with a list of. proposed streel. names with at least three alternatives. The approval of the final street name shall be made by the director of environmental services. 7. Prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contemplated by this approval, the applicant shall first obtain permits and/or clearance from the following agencies: Riverside County Department of Health Palm Desert Architectural Comrnission City Fire :Marshal Coachella Valley Water District m above agencies Evidence of said permit or clearance fro the ab � al,enci .s shall he to the department of building and safety at the time of issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. 8. A covenant, approved by the city attorney, shall be recorded dedicating all development rights to the city for Lot ".A" and all other areas shown as undisturbed natural terrain in the approved hillside development plan. 9. Applicant shall pay 628 per building site for school district impact fees, or as determined by the Desert Sands Unified S�hooi 7istrl::t. Department of Public Works: 10. Drainage and signalizaation fund fees, as rewired by city ordinance, shall be paid prior to recordation of the final map.. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 969 if. Additional storm drain construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study by the private engineer. 12. Improvement plans for water and sewer systems shall be approved by the respective service districts. 13. All private streets shall be inspected by the engineering department and a standard inspection fee shall be paid. 14. Complete grading plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the city engineer for checking and approval prior to issuance of any permits. 15. Full improvement of interior streets, including curb and gutter, based on 36' residential street standards. Fire Marshal Conditions: 16. Install a water system capable of delivering 1500 GPM fire flow from any fire hydrant for a two hour duration in addition to domestic supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement. Fire flow requirements shall depend on built-in fire protection provisions of buildings. 17. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants located at each intersection: a. but not greater than 500 feet apart in any direction. b. so that no point of any building is more than 250 feet from a fire hydrant measured along approved vehicular travel ways. C. exterior surface of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow,, and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. d. curbs shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. e. hydrants shall not be located closer than 25 feet to any building. 18. Prior to recordation of the final map, the developer shall furnish the original and three copies of the water system plan to the Fire Marshal for review. 19. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and three copies of the water systern plan to the Fire Marshal .for review. Upon approval, one copy will be sent to the Building Department, and the original will be returned to the developer. 20. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and approved g g PP by the water company with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system in TT 20024, HDP 84-2. is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Fire .Marshal." 21. Prior to delivery of combustible materials to the building site, the required water- system shall be installed, operating, and delivering; the required flow. 22. Additional fire protection requirements may be necessary when the applicant submits specific plans for consideration and approval. 23. Minimum street width is 28 feet, or as approved by the city Fire Marshal or the Director of Public Works. 24. Both streets must have 40 .foot turning radius cul-de-sacs or as approved by Fire Marshal. 1 City of Palm Desert Staff Report TO: Planning Commission DATE: July 3, 1984 CASE NOS: HDP 84-2 an( 20024 REQUEST: Approval of a Hillside Development Plan, 11 lot Tentative Tract Map, and Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact, to allow eight homesites and dedicated open space on 8.24 acres generally located on the west side of the Palm Valley Storm Channel across from the Sommerset Condonmiums. APPLICANT: RICHARD SMITH, ET. AL. 960 E. Tahquitz-McCallum Way, Suite 201 Palm Springs, CA 92262 L BACKGROUND: A. ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USES: NORTH: HPR,D/Vacant SOUTH: HPR,D/Vacant EAST: PR-8/Storm Channel and Condominiums WEST: HPR,D/Vacant B. GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION: Hillside Planned Residential. C. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Development will be confined to areas which have already experienced grading modification. Project will be required to renaturalize all existing and proposed cuts or fills. Five and one half percent (5.5%) of the hillside area will be left undisturbed. Thirty-six percent (36%) of the total site will be dedicated for permanent open space. A Draft Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact has been prepared. H. DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS: A. SITE DESCRIPTION: The 8.24 acre site is directly adjacent to the Palm Valley Storm Channel. It includes 2.38 acres at the base of the hills which has been filled and graded as part of the storm channel construction. The southwest portion of the property rises abruptly with slopes over 35%. On the northwest side, slopes are more moderate and previous owner had graded an access road and three small building pads. B. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is utilizing Option No. 3 of the Hillside Planned Residential Ordinance. In this option, the applicant delineates areas within parcels with average slopes of less than 20%. In these areas, development can occur at a density of two units per acre. Total density for the whole property cannot exceed one unit per acre. On the subject property, four acres have been delineated with an average slope of 20%, allowing a total of eight building sites. The area corresponds to the previously disturbed portion of the property. Five lots will be located at the base of the slope in the area graded by Coachella Valley Water District. For the three hillside lots, grading is limited by the hillside ordinance to - 1 - 1 HDP 84-2 and TT 26024 10,000 square feet per pad. All exposed cuts or fills must be renaturalized to blend with undisturbed terrain. The eight lots and access road will account for 5.31 acres. Development rights to the remaining 2.93 acres shall be dedicated to the city for permanent open space. The extent of the grading on the hillside pads will be reviewed by the Planning Commission with the house plans. Roadway and drainage engineering must be approved by the Director of Public Works. III. CONCLUSION: The proposed hillside development plan and tentative tract map meets the intent and specific requirements of the hillside planned residential zone. The following findings support this conclusion: A. The design, improvements, type of development, and density of the proposed map and hillside development plan are consistent with the State Subdivision Map Act, Palm Desert Subdivision and Zoning Ordinance, General Plan, and the West Hills Specific Plan. B. The design of the subdivision will not result in substantial environmental damage, injure fish or wildlife, or result in public health problems. Water, sewer, and drainage improvement shall be as approved by the Coachella Valley Water District, the Riverside County Health Department, and the .engineering division of the Palm Desert Department of Public Works. C. The proposal will not conflict with public easements. D. The design will allow unrestricted solar access to all lots. IV. RECOMMENDATION: Approve findings and adopt Resolution No. , approving HDP 84-2, TT 20024, and a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact, subject to the conditions. V. ATTACHMENTS: A. Resolution B. Negative Declaration C. Statement from Applicant D. Legal Notice Prepared by. Reviewed and approved by:�r /tm - 2 - PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. ### A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT PLAN, 11 LOT TENTATIVE TRACT MAP, AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT, TO ALLOW EIGHT HOMESITES AND OPEN SPACE ON 8.24 ACRES GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE PALM VALLEY STORM CHANNEL ACROSS FROM SOMMERSET CONDOMINIUMS. CASE NO. HDP 84-2 and TT 20024 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 3rd day of July, 1984, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider a request by RICHARD SMITH, et. al., for approval of a Hillside Development Plan, 11 lot Tentative Tract Map, and Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact, to allow eight homesites and open space on 8.24 acres within the HPR zone generally located on the west side of the Palm Valley Storm Channel across from Sommerset Condominiums. WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedures to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 80-89", in that the director of environmental services has determined that the project will not have an adverse impact on the environment and a draft Negative Declaration has been prepared. WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said planning commission did find the following facts to justify their actions, as described below: 1. The design, improvements, type of development, and density of the proposed map and hillside development plan are consistent with the State Subdivision Map Act, Palm Desert Subdivision and Zoning Ordinance, General Plan, and the West Hills Specific Plan. 2. The design of the subdivision will not result in substantial environmental damage, injure fish or wildlife, or result in public health problems. Water, sewer, and drainage improvement shall be as approved by the Coachella Valle Water District the Riverside Count Health Department, and the Y � Y P engineering division of the Palm Desert Department of Public Works. 3. The proposal will not conflict with public easements. 4. The design will allow unrestricted solar access to all lots. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the commission in this case. 2. That the planning commission does hereby approve the above described Tentative Map No. 20024 exhibit 'A' and HDP 02-84 exhibit 'B' on file in the Department of Environmental Services, subject to the attached conditions. 3. That a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact is hereby approved. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 3rd day of July, 1984, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: BUFORD CRITES, Chairman ATTEST: RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary Am r PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NOS. HDP 84-2 and TT 20024 Department of Environmental Services: 1. The development of the property described herein shall conform to the approved exhibits on file in the Department of Environmental Services in addition to all municipal ordinances, state and federal statutes now in force or which hereafter may be in force. 2. The applicant shall have twenty-four (24) months from the date of the approval or conditional approval of the tentative map for filing of the final map unless an extension of time as permitted by code is granted by planning commission. 3. All on-site utilities, including cable TV, shall be placed underground and shall be completely concealed from view except certain appurtenances as may be approved by the director of environmental services. 4. All dedicated land and/or easements required by this approval shall be granted to the City of Palm Desert, or other appropriate agency, without cost and free of all liens and encumbrances. 5. The CC&R's for this development shall be submitted to the director of environmental services for review and final approval by the city attorney prior to the issuance of any building permits. Prior to recordation of the final subdivision map, the applicant shall submit to the city engineer: a. The document to convey title. b. Covenants and restrictions to be recorded. C. Management and maintenance agreement to be entered into with the owners of the units of the projects. 6. Prior to submittal of the final map, the applicant shall provide the department of environmental services with a list of proposed street names with at least three alternatives. The approval of the final street name shall be made by the director of environmental services. 7. Prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contemplated by this approval, the applicant shall first obtain permits and/or clearance from the following agencies: Riverside County Department of Health Palm Desert Architectural Commission City Fire Marshal Coachella Valley Water District Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to the department of building and safety at the time of issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. 8. A covenant, approved by the city attorney, shall be recorded dedicating all development rights to the city for Lot "A" and all other areas shown as undisturbed natural terrain in the approved hillside development plan. 9. Applicant shall pay $628 school district impact fees, or as determined by the Desert Sands Unified School District. Department of Public Works: 10. Drainage and signalization fund fees, as required by city ordinance, shall be paid prior to recordation of the final map. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11. Additional storm drain construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study by the private engineer. 12. Improvement plans for water and sewer systems shall be approved by the respective service districts. 13. All private streets shall be inspected by the engineering department and a standard inspection fee shall be paid. 14. Complete grading plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the city engineer for checking and approval prior to issuance of any permits. 15. Full improvement of interior streets, including curb and gutter, based on 36' residential street standards. 16. Traffic analysis to be prepared for the project. Fire Marshal Conditions: 17. Install a water system capable of delivering 1500 GPM fire flow from any fire hydrant for a two hour duration in addition to domestic supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement. Fire flow requirements shall depend on built-in fire protection provisions of buildings. 18. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants located at each intersection: a. but not greater than 500 feet apart in any direction. b. so that no point of any building is more than 250 feet from a fire hydrant measured along approved vehicular travel ways. C. exterior surface of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow, and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. d. curbs shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. e. hydrants shall not be located closer than 25 feet to any building. 19. Prior to recordation of the final map, the developer shall furnish the original and three copies of the water system plan to the Fire Marshal for review. 20. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and three copies of the water system plan to the Fire Marshal for review. Upon approval, one copy will be sent to the Building Department, and the original will be returned to the developer. 21. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and approved by the water company with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system in TT 20024, HDP 84-2, is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Fire Marshal." 22. Prior to delivery of combustible materials to the building site, the required water system shall be installed, operating, and delivering the required flow. 23. Additional fire protection requirements may be necessary when the applicant submits specific plans for consideration and approval. 24. Minimum street width is 28 feet. 25. Both streets must have 40 foot turning radius cul-de-sacs or as approved by Fire Marshal. i TENTATIVE TRACT MAP N° 20024 7-7 I.A,r IN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT \\ Y4�ry COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE,STATE OF CALIFORNIA �.� I 1 " _X_ a •..nm I A PORTION OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH a HALF OF GOVERNMENT LOT 2 IN THE NOiTMNEST pWRTEN OF FRACTIONAL SECTION N TOWNSHIP S Sg1TH RANM 6 EAST, Y 1�`t /\,�i -al' } J , ( , 3 ,...°.° • TOTAL TRACT AREA=824 AC. SAN BERNARDINO BASE"MERIDIAN.AS SHOWN BY UNITED I . OTT AO STATE GOVERNMENT SURVEY,RECORDED N THE OFFICE OF THE 2.1_ LW 5. 045 K. SURVEYOR GENEML$ON•ULY 6•IB56. ) J'r 1/� �.. S /I I - W s: o43 SEER FEBRUART 1384 `�� - m ••rJ is o.aax 9M E.TA"0,ATZ .mLlr Wa SCALE,I•°10, I �r- I _' ,� < s. _ Nur smmcs.0 azxez • �1 0 \ j}e� , k� T LIIg_ w 8: OOE 'OJm EdNb5CAE£ PMPoSLSI Isla)!n-oa4D ' 1.9! AG OfEu 9RAEE1 WATER SEWER UTILITIES C• oE. Ac.Isa+RRIWTE R4AFNn ELRwnll DEVELOPER/SUBDIVIDER e°°A�no mewuulli"sru RSTNer ) 1 � _ a T' eu%, / o RIwu9 wrtx,«« coAwnu u.nzsa - �` ` T a• o sF4ETARmAT1-u.p`wt.m rc1sl Sae-iasl Z4MN0 N-I RYY eN11Na9.CA 92265 Iefl Sxx-4540 STORM GRAM UTILITIES \I " k / r / 'f W14VOSEYIOmN4 - R-I L� ATRICT / IXISTINO SITE VSE-VALNR ENGINEER eSe10 mAwELL.NTfl /1I - • II Ie' It . 1691 36e--41NlORp O MORE 0.T1NT3 Fw -A 4 9xi% ] L NEW W A-10 E651 ALY MINER S6TaC61.9260 (IT (r• A-A LO w':• J f �:_—._` 1. i'•n s F \ enr � .ram•,.T+v.I y ��_�. \ - � .<r` :� I I I \ a.sN wNr�ws I �'a'A'(C CITY OF �, vh 11 t n -I I i n'e.eur.wri IF!/Rk" IA PAUA DESERT �.. 4b '� I .$wdl / DEPA TMENT '. G. o �J '", R STANFOIAI E UNITS .. : I - _..... .I t'._ rlm NAP R1cnREP er 6mM - ENVIRONRIENTAL wvER THE swER IS aN n: w e•' S SERVICES _—� " c, ` �- .-.i�\. \ �- -,i� m ROAD PRIVATE SECTIONS wrz R/oeERr a s� .s 1 EXHIBIT - � � \ r _1 i 1 1I l 1r i su,E CASE NO•V q 1 � VREM11E0 9Y' UGG11C!JCTGNCl31�S�YCVLTDIVT! ,..... ....- •• I 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 NEGATIVE DECLARATION (Pursuant to Title 14, Division 6, Article 7, Section 15083, of the California Administrative Code). Case Nos: HDP 84-2 and TT 20024 Applicant/Proiect Sponsor: RICHARD SMITH, 960 E. Tahquitz McCallum, Palm Springs, CA 92262. Project Description/Location: An eight homesite residential subdivision on 8.24 acres located on the west side of the Palm Valley Storm Channel in the northwest quarter of Section 31 T5S R6E SBM. The director of environmental services, City of Palm Desert, California, has found that the described project will not have a significant effect on the environment. A copy of the initial study has been attached to document the reasons in support of this finding. Mitigation measures, if any, included in the project to avoid potentially significant effects, may also be found attached. RAMON A. DIAZ DATE Director of Environmental Services RAD/tm CASZ 'To. ENVI8O1131=TAL SERVICES DEPT. IDIITIAL STUDY MMIRODl3M,"TTAL EVALUATIOII CHECKLIST NOTE: The availability of data necessary to address the topics listed below shall form the basis of a decision as to whether the application is considered complete for purposes of environmental assessment. ENVIROI-IMEYTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers , possible mitigation measures and comments are provided on attached sheets) . Yes Maybe No 1 . Earth. Will the proposal result in: , a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in ti geologic substructures? —' b. Disruptions, displacements , compaction, or v overcovering of the soil? c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? ✓ d. The destruction, covering ., or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? _ (� e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? _ _✓ 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? v b. The creation of objectionable odors? c. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature , or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? Yes- Maybe No 3- Water. Will the proposal result in: a_. Changes. in currents. 'or the course or 1 :. direction of water movements? b. Changes in-absorption Fates, drainage Patterns, or the rate and- amount of surface water runoff? f c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? ✓ d. Alteration of .the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? e. Change in the quantity of ground waters, / either through direct additions or with- drawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? f f. Reduction in the amount of water other. wise available for public water supplies? 4. ' Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of plants (including trees , shrubs , grass , and crops )? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or endangered species of plants? - c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area , or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? S. Animal. Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds , land animals including reptiles , or insects)? f b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or endangered species of animals? _ v c. Introduction of new species of animals Into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? (r d. Oeterioration to existing wildlife ha01t2t? i 3. Yes robe No 6. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in .•.Lhe rate of use of any natural resources? b. Oepletion of any non-renewable natural resource? 7. En_e_ rrcv.. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? b. Oemand upon existing sources of energy, or re- quire the.development of new sources of energy? 8. Risk of Upset. . Ooes the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, pesticides, oil , chemicals, or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? 9. E^anon s. Will the proposal result in: a. A change in the value of property and improvements endangered by flooding? _ b. A change in the value of property and : impro•+enen:s exposed to geologic hazards beyond accepted coca.unity risk standards? 10. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels to the point at which accepted community noise and vibration levels are exceeded? 401, i1. Land use. Will -the proposal result in the a tTe�aC on of the present developed or planned land use of an area? 12. Open Space. Will the proposal lead to a decrease in the amount of designated open space? 13. Population. Will the proposal result in: a. Alteraticn or the location, distribution , density, or growth rate of the human population of the City? o" b. Change in the population distribution by aye, income, religion, racial , or ethnic group, occupational class , household type? Ir • 4. ` Yes Maybe No 14. Emolo ent. Will the proposal result in additions new long-term jobs. provided, or a change in the number and per cent employed , unemployed, and underemployed? ✓ 15. Heusinc. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in number and per cent of housing units by type (price or rent range, zoning category, owner-occupied and rental , etc. ) relative to demand or to number of families in various income classes in the City? _ 7— b. Impacts an existing housing or creation of a demand for additional housing? f 16. iransoo otion/Circulation. Will the proposal ' resu t tnm: a. Generation of additional vehicular movement? b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or " demand for new parking? C. Impact upon existing transportation systems? d. Alterations to present patterns of Circulation or movement of people and/or goods? d e. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , bicyclists, or pedestrians? 17. Public Services, Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for, new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? b. Police protection? c. Schools? �l d. Parks or other recreational facilities? e. Maintenance of public facilities , including roads? f. Other governmental services? ------------- ' ` S Yes Maybe No 18. Public Fiscal Balance. Will the proposal resu t in a net change in government fiscal flow (revenues less operating expenditures and annualized capital expenditures)? 1g. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a ' nee for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas7 r b. Communications system? c. Water? d. Sewer or septic tanks? f e. Storm water drainage? v f. Solid waste and disposal? 20. Human Health. Will the proposal result in: a. The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? y b. A change in the level of community health care provided? _ — 21. Social Services. Will the proposal result in an increased demand for provision of general social services? cd' 22. Aesthetics . Will the proposal result in: a. Obstruction of any scenic vista, or view open to the public? r b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? c. Lessening of the overall neighborhood (or area) attractiveness, pleasantness, : d and uniqueness? 23. Licht and Glars. Will the proposal produce ne4v light or g are? 24. Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal resu tin an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object, or building? 6. Yes Maybe No 25. Mandatory Findings of Significance. a. Oces the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment or to curtail the diversity in the environment? ✓ b. Ooes the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental .goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future. ) c. Ooes the project have impacts which are indi- vidually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively sma11 , but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment v is significant. ) d. Ooes the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings , either directly or indirectly? Initial Study Prepared By: � "�—�� PALM DESERT HEIGHTS palm Desert Heights is unique in many ways. Careful planning and consideration for environmental as well as aesthetic issues have been addressed. The following are some basic design considerations and performance standards. The existing site consists of a rugged desert hillside covering two-thirds of the property. Along the eastern boundary is a gently sloping alluvial fan. Three small building pads have been cut into the hillside spurs at the north end of the site. The basic design concept is to locate hillside five ads a Tthe es on the alluvial fan and three sites on the existing remainder of the property will be left in its natural state as open space. sitesThe dividual homedesign of with hminimal wgrading ay and land ot adisturbance yout will allow the natural terrain. Prior to grading for the road, existing native boulders will be stockpiled. After completion of grading all disturbed areas will be renaturaHzed using the native boulders and plants. Building colors shall reflect natural earth tones and styles should blend with the existing topography. Landscaping should blend with existing vegetation utilizing drought tolerant and native species where possible. A transition zone will be established between introduced landscaping adjacent to the structure and existing natural plant material. There will be no fencing around the property line perimeters of the hill- side lots. Private spaces will be an integral part of the architectural design. All utilities will be underground and follow the proposed road. Service to individual hoaxes will be under driveways. This will minimize site disturbance. be d at the rear lots 1-5 mThiss will b treat d withenatural will varnish t blend f with the terrain. There is no proposed street lighting. Any disturbed areas during construction will be renaturaHzed utilizing native plant mataiial end boulders.. Cut slopes will be as recommended s the scila not report port (to be However, Additional buttressing of the slop exposed rock will be treated with natural weatherizing varnish to redued the effect of scarring. Key fill slopes will be treated as required in the soils report. Two small concrete retaining walls will be required. These will be treated with natural weatherising varnish. CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE CASE NOS. HDP 84-2 and TT 20024 NOTICE 15 HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by RICHARD SMITH for approval of a Hillside Development Plan, 11 lot Tentative Tract Map and Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact to allow 8 homesites on 8.24 acres within the HPR,D zone generally located on the west side of the Palm Valley Storm Channel across from Sommerset Condominiums, more particularly described as: APN 631-07-002 .(cuP- ... . P.k:7 S.F. �1400 E)tiq dS.P. — --- - - © .... E P S.P. nAr SIAC• ROAD O.S. 110LODO . R 1 - 3 i 1 ,r • 1 I ob I I 1 11. 1 R-r __ l r � •r • • w0 /) ?:ux couAT. P.R.-3 _ P.R.-S. :- (D.P. 09-78) (CUP 1367) H.PR: OA A;CJu AT P.iF=B t P VIEW DR( (CUP-1357)1-. _ - ---� `T 1 ("R-1 RaPR-6/'Cu 1507) -� - P.R.-7 .� . �- — .,P't:a AeEvuE �!P.�.. ,A uDE ALLI . \.,i� •` \ /� PR•7 P.R.-7 1CJF 1782 ) '1 NOIAx SPNIW, S.P./ SAID Public Hearing will be held on Tuesday, July 3, 1984, at 7:00 p.m., in the Council Chamber at Palm Desert Civic Center, 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary Palm Desert Planning Commission PUBLISH: Palm Desert Post June 22, 1984 Am 1 t1ATEq ESTABLISHED IN 1918 AS A PUBLIC AGENCY ��SiR1C� COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT POST OFFICE BOX 1058• COACHELLA, CALIFORNIA 92236•TELEPHONE(619)398-2651 DIRECTORS OFFICERS RAYMOND R.RUMMONDS,PRESIDENT LOWELLO.WEEKS,GENERAL MANAGER-CHIEF ENGINEER TELLISCODEKAS,VICE PRESIDENT June 5, 1984 BERNARDINE SUTTON,SECRETARY JOHN P.POW ELL REDWINE AND SHERRILL,ATTORNEYS PAUL W.NICHOLS STEVE D.BUXTON File: 0163. 11 0421. 1 0721.1 1984 ENVIRONMENTAL CITY SERVICES PALM DESERT Department of Environmental Services City of Palm Desert Post Office Box 1977 Palm Desert, California 92261 Gentlemen: Subject: Tract 20024, Hillside Development Plan 84-2, Por. NWk, Sec. 31, T5S, R6E, SBM This area lies on the mountain slopes west of Highway 74. This area is not subject to flooding from stormwater flows except in rare instances, however, the runoff from the adjacent mountains can cause serious damage to improvements. The design of interior drainage works should include provisions for solving this problem. The drawing "Tentative Tract Map No. 20024 contains a note "STORM DRAIN UTILITIES COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT." Please note, the only stormwater control facilities in this area are the Palm Valley Stormwater Channel and facilities appurtenant thereto. The channel and appurtenant facilities are operated and maintained by the District. There is no commitment by the District to operate and maintain "Storm Drain Utilities" within this tract. P This area is designated Zone C on Federal Flood Insurance rate maps which ire in effect at this time. The District will furnish domestic water and sanitation service to this area in accordance with the current regulations of this District. TRUE CONSERVATION USE WATER WISELY Department of Environmental Services -2- June 5, 1984 This area shall be annexed to Improvement District Nos. 54 and 80 of Coachella Valley Water District for sanitation service. Yours very truly Dell 0. Ow Weeks Gene r l Manager-Chief Engineer CS:lmf cc: Riverside County Department of Public Health 46-209 Oasis Street Indio, California 92201 Attention: Don Park 1 �9\ TENTATIVE �.,,_ _ TRACT MAP N° 20024 A. V/UN/)Y MAP d IN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT _ �/ F �i ae•LOT B .Y'_�.. I COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE,STATE OF CALIFORNIA " zi A� \\ as I / ✓' ' r'ja: A-,. -LL yT xTHE NORTH HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE .Am HALF OFIOGOVOERNMENT LOT 2 IN THE NORTHWEST OUARTER OFSQRN FRACTIONAL SECTION 31 TOWNSHIP SOUTH RAGE 6 EAST TOTAL TRACT AREA•824 AC. SAN BERNARDINO BASE 4NDMERIWAN.AS SHOWN BY UNffED Lm 1 o.n 4e STATE GOVERNMENT SURVEY.RECORDED N THE OFFICE OF THE LOT i• AW A0 SURVEYOR GENERALS ON NLY IS.IMS. �I • 5 J �-(' <Yly F-R/ f LOT 3. A43 ¢. LOT 4. o 4D AS. •`�' J / (�� 1� (�( Y_=�_ - r e_3 / I/ r- �T �. 043 u OWNER FEBRUARY 1984 1 _ 063 AS. RI61HWITH..•RD .1 K RxJ LOT T• ABA Ac 960E TAxaurzMC CALLUM wa SCALE'1�.40' 6. Ass A4 PNN SPRMGS.CA 922. x.• \ 1 ,g. y LOT A• 293 D.IDFEN$PACE) INS En-0900 WATER.SEWER UTILITIES \ I 1 , I +< aw 1 r- LOT B• 001 AC IFdtlsxDSCAPE NIRNg51 COACXELLA VALLEY WATER p51RCT LOT < 0.64 AS.IFORPRIVATERDAWAI'MMIEll DEVELOPER/SUBDIVIDER RICNARD SMrtN 1 OAWED[xCA.92236 I -✓ ` ` _ ` �/ , OT 'li' I c ttPoLM SPR11NG5 CA K262 WAY 16191 396-2651 EXISTING ZONING - R-I ()11\\ v IRS)32i-O900 STORM DRAIN UTILITIES MOPOSEr 3-h11 i ,\ ♦ %, MISTING Y MxG _R. O LA TA wA wT MISTING 9T2 ME R.I ENGINEER 939z0 LLIDGAIDCLLA Nr6 / • �` I WAONER-STANFORD CONSULTANTS CMCHELIACA.92336 ✓�. / / J I nJ / �• d __ 74-IM EL PASE0 SUITE A-10 (6191 39 0-2�51 ` - _ .l n e:oo PALM DESERT,CA.92260 A O I6K)569-5696 I! /OT4 , wt s m } 1 IF 1LO a-e AA •n Y..:. 5 k:• �_ - - _-- :ew.sn! .Trnaw A.I _ _ k -y' f I TW9 MAP MEP4RE0 BY MAGNER-STANFORp CONSIRTART9 IHDER THE SWERVISION OF: - �\ D ROAD PRIVATE SECTIONS mre R—.1 a sTAxroRD L�1 s:44sT .c.,A 1- ( �� . - \ 1� _ 6 - F09fF J LW:L P SSOGmfSu.�a x• PREPnRED 9Y: WGCNCI9!!"N930CmC�NSLILTGNTC 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE(619)346-0611 PLANNING CCI!T11SSION MEETING NOTICE OF ACTION DATE: July 22, 1988 MR. WILLIAM CONRAD P.O. Box 81 Cedar Glean, CA 92321 Re: Case No. TT 20024 - Time Extension The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of July 5, 1988. APPfUM) BY MIWIM MYPICN CASE NO. TT 20024. CAIUU D 3-0. Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Community Development, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. DIAZ, SE PALM DESERT PLANNING�IISSION RAD/fr � 1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. r A ' i� A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL lots IMPACT, PRECISE PLAN, ASSOCIATED PARCEL MAP T WAIVERS, AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF 10 FOURPLEXES (40 UNITS) ON 2.31 ACRES WITHIN THE R-3 AND R-3 (3) ZONES GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF DRIFTWOOD DRIVE, EAST OF DEEP CANYON ROAD. CASE NO. PP 84-13, PMW 84-5,6,7 and 8 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 5th day of June, 1984, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider a request by NELSON DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC., for approval of a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact, Precise Plan, Parcel Map Waivers, and Development Agreement, to allow construction of 10 fourplexes (40 units) on 11 existing lots totaling 2.31 acres within the R-3 and R-3 (3) zones, located on the north side of Driftwood Drive, east of Deep Canyon Road. WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedures for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 80-89," in that the director of environmental services has determined that the project will not have a significant impact on the environment and a Negative Declaration has been prepared. WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be hear, said planning commission did find the following facts to exist to justify their actions: 1. The design of the proposed use complies with the requirements of the zoning ordinance, will be compatible with surrounding uses, and will not depreciate property values in the vicinity. 2. The change of zone and precise plan are consistent with the policies of the adopted Palm Desert General Plan and complies with standards for affordable housing high density development outlined in the proposed housing element. 3. The proposed development agreement insures compliance with Section 65951 of the California Government Code. 4. The parcel map waiver lot line adjustments comply with all applicable zoning ordinance, general plan, and public improvement requirements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the commission in this case; 2. Precise Plan 84-13 Exhibit "A" is hereby approved subject to attached conditions; 3. Parcel .Map Waivers '84-5,6,7, and 8, Exhibits B, C, D, and E, are herebv approved. 4. Approval of the Nelson Development Agreement, Exhibit "F," is recommended to city council; 5. A Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact is hereby approved. l MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION JULY 7, 1987 V1 . CONSENT CALENDAR A. Case N TT WILLIAM F. CONRAD, Applicant Request for approval of a one year time extension for Tract 20024. B. Case No. PMW 87-6 - RAY-AL ENTERPRISES INC. , Applicant Request for approval of a parcel map waiver to create one parcel out of two existing parcels on 73-505 Catalina. C. Case No. PMW 87-9 - FRED VEIGA, Applicant Request for approval of a parcel map waiver to create one parcel out of two existing parcels. Action: Moved by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner Whitlock, j approving the consent calendar by minute motion. Carried 4-0. VII . PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Continued Case No. CUP 87-6 - RALPH AND VONNA WESTFALL, Applicants Request for approval of a conditional use permit to allow conversion of nine of the existing motel units to office professional use. Mr. Smith explained that the applicant was requesting a continuance to August 4, 1987. Chairman Erwood opened the public testimony and asked if anyone present wished to speak in FAVOR or OPPOSITION to, the proposed. There being no one , Chairman Erwood requested a motion of continuance. Action: Moved by Commissioner Whitlock, seconded by Commissioner Ladlow, continuing CUP 87-6 to August 4, 1987. Carried 4-0. 2 1 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NOTICE OF ACTION Date: July 10, 1987 William F. Conrad P.O. Box 81 Cedar Glen, CA 92321 Re: TT 20024 The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of July 7, 1987. Commission approved a one year time extension by minute motion Carried 4-0 Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Community Development, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen ( 15) days of the date of the decision. RAMONN A. DIAZ, SECRET PALM DESERT PLANNING C MMISSION RAO/tm 4 - 1 n INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM City of Palm Desert TO: Planning Commission FROM: Director of Community Development/Planning DATE: July 7, 1987 SUBJECT: Tentative Tract 20024 Staff is recommending approval of the attached one-year time extension for Tract 20024. RAMON A. DIAZ DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT/PLANNING RAD/tm �1��lL �, � Pulldl� w.ztza,;toz POST OFFICE BOX 3W 81 -VX§tA%R=6ft CALIFORNIA PHONE 17141 337-1934 Cedar Glen, Calif. 92321 �V JUN 1 71987 Planning Commission �DµµUNITY DEVELOWL141 DEVANIMENI City of Palm Desert CITI OF PALM DESERT City Hall 73510 Fred Waring Drive 2a�m Desert, California 92260 Gentlemen: Re: Tentative Subdivision Tract 20024 The above referenced map will expire in July, 1987. We are the owners of this property and hereby request a one (1) year extension. We heed this extra time to continue our efforts to obtain satisfactory public access to the subject property. .J We would ar.'reciate your advising us of the date and time of the meeting lahon this will be acted uton. Ts it necessary that we attend: Thank you for your attention. Yours v ry truly, L� , :;rs. Mary B yl ((Ms. Evelyn M.Fo g-'? (firs. W nnifred Conrad) ti 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NOTICE OF ACTION Date: July 2, 1986 MRS. MARY BEYL MRS. EVELYN FOGG MRS. WINN[FRED CONRAD P.O. Box 81 Re: 20 402 AND HDP 84-2 The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of July 1 , 1986. PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVED A ONE YEAR TIME EXTENSION BY MINUTE MOTION. CARRIED 5-0. Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Community Development, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen ( 15) days of the date of the decision. RAMON A. DIAZ, SECR(TAPALM DESERT PLANNINISSION RAD/tm MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION JULY 1 , 1986 Vi. CONSENT CALENDAR I �� A. Case Nos. TT 2002 AND HDP 84-2 - MRS. MARY BEYL, MRS. EVELYN FOGG, AND MRS. WINNIFRED CONRAD, Applicants Request for approval of a one-year time extension for a nine lot Hillside Development Plan and Tract Map for 8.24 acres located west of the Palm Valley Storm Channel . Action: Moved by Commissioner Downs, seconded by Commissioner Richards, approving the consent calendar by minute motion. Carried 5-0. Vll . PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Case No. CUP 86-2 - ROBERT L. HENRY, Applicant Request for approval of a conditional use permit to allow a preschool/kindergarten and day care center for a maximum of 80 children in residential facilities in an R-2 S.O. zone located on the west side of San Pascual Avenue, 200 feet south of Santa Rosa Way. Mr. Diaz outlined the salient points of the staff report and recommended approval of CUP 86-2, subject to the conditions. Chairman Crites opened the public testimony and asked if anyone present wished to speak in FAVOR or OPPOSITION to the proposed project. There being no one, the public testimony was closed. Action: Moved by Commissioner Erwood, seconded by Commissioner Downs, adopting the findings as presented by staff. Carried 570. Moved by Commissioner Erwood, seconded by Commissioner Downs, adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 1154, approving CUP 86-2, subject to conditions. Carried 5-0. B. Case No. PP 85-5 Amerxnient - CHARTER COMMUNITIES, Applicant Request for approval of an amendment of an approved precise plan for a congregate care 2 PROOF OF IP431.ICATION This space is for the County Clerk's Filing Stamp (2015.5 C.C.P.) V STATE OF CALIFORNIA# County of Riverside " CD I am a citizen of the United States and a' CITY OF PALbr- SbRT resident of the County aforesaid; I am over U the age of elghfeento .years, and not a party to Proof of Pu§]ICatlon of U) CDor interested in the above-entitled matter: 1 -- am the principal clerk of the printer of the c S>; NOS . �: 20024 � ................. ..HD1�84-2 an. .................. ..........DESERT. POST ............................. ,.....:.................................................. ... . . Paste Clipping a newspaper of general circulation,�printed of Notice .SECURELY and published.......94.-.x@.ekxY............. In This Space In the City of ......RA].10..ReA8.rz......... ti; rY: P"a iQcs County of Riverside, and which news. Paper has been adjudged a newspaper of general 'Circulation by the Superior '` r+ M Court of the County of Riverside. State of California,under the date of,;.>,pGS. •19.6.4, Case Number ..MA5.8......; that the notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy (set ;~ In type not smaller than nonpareil), has been published in each regular and entire & issue of said newspaper and not in any a4M, ; supplement thereof on the following dates, ilk i to-wit: 6/22/84 3 all in the year 19.2L. 1 certify (or declare) under A penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated at,,,, pji,}m. Desert Californiaa/,this,zz;a„dayof,sune 19 .e4. S1 nat re NMtNN�N Wlt,Unt lYatMYMNSWNInaI . CALIFORNIA NEWSPAPER SERVICE BUREAU, INC. Legal Advertising Clearing House 120 West Second St., Los Angeles,Calif. 90612 Telephone: (21'31625.2541 Y.w.0 asMea"►nw w vwual.. ww WWI"tW.Yfa. . '. EISNER•SMITH AND ASSOCIATES PLANNING CONSULTANTS 960 E.Tahquitz-McCallum Way,Suite 201,Palm Springs,California 92262 a Telephone(619)322-0900 1439 Hill Drive,Los Angeles,California 90041 May 3, 1984 Mr. Ramon Diaz Director, Environmental Services 56-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, CA 92260 Dear Ray: Please find enclosed application materials for Conditional Use Permit request and Tentative Tract Map for property west of the Palm Valley Storm Channel at the westerly extension. The following materials are enclosed: Conditional Use Permit a) One colored Residential/Landscape Design Concept b) Two copies of Residential/Landscape Design Concept c) One colored Site Disturbance Concept d) Two copies of Site Disturbance Concept e) Conditional Use Permit Application f) Expanded Statement of Project g) Letter of Authorization h) Two copies of property owners list i) Two copies of property owners mailing labels j) Two copies of project sponsor mailing labels k) Title Company letter of Certification 1) Environmental assessment form Tentative Tract Map Application a) Twelve (12) copies 401 scale Tract Map Exhibits b) Twenty (23) copies of 8y111 x 13" Tract Map Reduction c) One (1) sepia original d) Tentative Tract Map application e) Expanded Statement of Project f) Letter of Authorization g) Two (2) copies of property owners list h) Two (2) copies of property owners mailing labels j) Two copies of project sponsor mailing labels k) Title Company letter of Certification 1) Environmental assessment form City and Regional Planning a Site Planning a Environmental Studies a Redevelopment a Housing Zoning Studies a General and Specific Plans a Land Subdivision Design May 3, 1984 Mr. Ramon Diaz CUP/TTM applications Page Two General aT CUP/TTMIEnv. Fees $637.50 b) Title Company map of adjacent property owners Should you have any questions regarding these application requests, please contact me at the above number. Very truly yours, Richard J. Smith, AICP Vice. President FJS:da Encls. CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE CASE NOS. HDP 84-2 and TT 20024 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by RICHARD SMITH for approval of a Hillside Development Plan, 11 lot Tentative Tract Map and Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact to allow 8 hornesites on 8.24 acres within the HPR,D zone generally located on the west side of the Palm Valley Storm Channel across from Somrnerset Condominiums, more particularly described as: APN 631-07-002 P.k.-7y S.F. ,1400 E)`4, R-1 S.P. 10 I_ / i E • Q; p S P L 1 1T O.S. :. I -• gA)S:ACr. R0A0 RI 1101000 _ I I I I R 113LOOO 0 s` I ]RHI H I I I RI _ _ _ I :✓ -1 I II I II R_I . ee. ' eie xo.o R-I . ._. ! RDRI 5TYAD R AD IOA o .Y'v i 1.1 II :; / LU-L n.LIRY .ounr. P.R.-3 -N ... 'PRr6. (D.P. 09-78) I .'::• ' „� „� .h (CUP 1367) H.PR ;q.: '.. I- aeRAsl C?v RT. 1 PR 8 P WE A evIEW DRIVE R ak' 1 ;'1 y Fa 'Y•" f,`_F R 47 (CUP-13i 1• .. - a?.':(Cu �1< Pro. .::' ...ii' •nJP'G:- AV E.YV E. f:ameebr [P PPIAGE :RAIL) 1& •�/� PR.7 P.R.-7 (CJI- 1382 ) l ..• YpIuN SPPIrxs S.P./ SAID Public Hearing will be held on Tuesday, July 3, 1984, at 7:00 p.m., in the Council Chamber at Palm Desert Civic Center, 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary Palm Desert Planning Commission PUBLISH: Palm Desert Post June 22, 1984 Am �w RIVERSIDE COUNTY 'CEO CAI/ FIRE DEPARTMENT g~ � IN COOPERATION WITH THE C UXTY . CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY na RIVERSI .n'.."i; DAVID L.FLAKE �yFAT OF F1REC F 210 WEST SAN JACINTO AVENUE May 2 ' 923111 ft PE TELEPHONE: (71 )65 -3183 �y TELEPHONE:(714)657.3183 6j INCHO MIRAGE FIRE STATION Ramon Diaz ry�Y2 .. .800 HIGHWAY 111 City of Palm Desert Fpvir� `' 1,984 RANCHO MIRAGE, CA 92270 73-510 Fred Waring Drive C/r; Nn, Palm Desert, CA 92260 of a 41 44, env, Reference : Case No. TT 20024, HDP 84-2, Applicant: I�f6hard Smith, Palm Desert Heights Dear Mr. Diaz, The following fire protection requirements are in accordance with the Uniform Fire Code and Life Safety Code standards. 1 . Install a water system capable of delivering 1500 GPM fire flow from any fire hydrant for a 2 hour duration in addition to domestic supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement. Fire flow require- ments shall depend on built-in fire protection provisions of buildings . 2. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants located at each intersection: a. but not greater than 500 feet apart in any direction. b. so that no point of any building is more than 250 feet from a fire hydrant measured along approved vehicular travel ways. c. exterior surface of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow, and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. d. curbs shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. e. hydrants shall not be located closer than 25 feet to any building. 3. Prior to recordation of the final map, the developer shall furnish the original and three copies of the water system plan to the Fire Marshal for review. 4. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and three copies of the water system plan to the Fire Marshal for review. Upon approval , one copy will be sent to the Building Department, and the original will be returned to the developer. 5. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and approved by the water company with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system in TT 20024, HDP 84-2, is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Fire Marshal ." SOUTHERN CALIFORNL! C�C�S COMPANY 3700 CENTRAL AVENUE • RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA R.W. RIDDELL ce^11 V O7 Eastern Division F,/Y���llr v` lyC'� MAILING ADDRESS: P. O. BOX 2200, RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92516 Distribution Planning Superi oO�r . pA�MDeSFRIVT June 6 , 1984 Nearest Location of Gas Main: Gas available in Canyon Lane, Sommerset and Maryvale on East side of Flood Control Channel City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 Re: Case No . HDP 84-2; TT20024 - Palm Desert Heights I Gentlemen: This letter is not to be interpreted as a contractual commit- ment to serve the proposed project; but only as an information service. Its intent is to notify you that the Southern Calif- ornia Gas Company has facilities in the area where the above named project is proposed. Gas service to the project could be provided from an existing main without any significant impact on the environment . The service would be in accordance with the Company' s policies and extension rules on file with the Calif- ornia Public Utilities Commission at the time contractual arrangements are made. The availability of natural gas service , as set forth in this letter , is based upon present conditions of gas supply and regulatory policies. As a public utility, the Southern Calif- ornia Public Utilities Commission. We can also be affected by actions of federal regulatory agencies . Should these agencies take any action which affects gas supply or the condition under which service is available, gas service will be provided in accordance with revised conditions. We have developed several programs which are available, upon request, to provide assistance in selecting the most effective applications of energy conservation techniques for a particular project. If you desire further information on any of our energy conservation programs, please contact our Area Market Services Manager , P.O. Box 6226, San Bernardino, CA 92417 , phone (714 ) 884-9411 . /4C1 // R. W. Ridd 1 Distribute n Planning Supervisor RWR:mac INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM City of Palm Desert ' c... TO: Director of Environmental Services 1984 ENVIRONMIENTAL SERVICES FROM: Director of Public Works CITY OF PALM DESERT SUBJECT: HDP 84-2, TT 20024 - RICHARD SMITH, ET AL DATE:June 14, 1984 The following should be considered as conditions of approval : (1) Drainage and signalization fund fees, as required by city ordinance, shall be paid prior to recordation of the final map. (2) Additional storm drain construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study by the private engineer. (3) Improvement plans for water and sewer systems shall be approved by the respec- tive service districts. (4) All private streets shall be inspected by the engineering department and a standard inspection fee shall be paid. (5) Complete grading plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the city engineer for checking and approval prior to issuance of any permits. (6) Fill improvement of interior streets based on 36' residential street standardsp, n,) s v c�Unc CU41S /9"V Urrd, , (7) Traffic analysis to be prepared for the project. gamy_�K CPS BARR McCLELLAN, P.E. ARC:BDM/ms .04CUF ON LC G/�Z' RcL SS , f - C��p EISNER•SMITH AND ASSOCIATES PLANNING CONSULTANTS 960 E.Tahquitz-McCallum Way,Suite 201, Palm Springs,California 92262 Telephone(619)322-0900 1439 Hill Drive,Los Angeles,California 90041 May 3, 1984 Mr. Ramon Diaz Director, Environmental Services 56-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, CA 92260 Dear Ray: Please find enclosed application materials for Conditional Use Permit request and Tentative Tract Map for property west of the Palm Valley Storm Channel at the westerly extension. The following materials are enclosed: Conditional Use Permit a) One colored Residential/Landscape Design Concept b) Two copies of Residential/Landscape Design Concept c) One colored Site Disturbance Concept d) Two copies of Site Disturbance Concept e) Conditional Use Permit Application f) Expanded Statement of Project g) Letter of Authorization h) Two copies of property owners list i) Two copies of property owners mailing labels j) Two copies of project sponsor mailing labels k) Title Company letter of Certification 1) Environmental assessment form Tentative Tract Map Application a) Twelve (12) copies 401 scale Tract Map Exhibits b) Twenty (23) copies of 8}11 x 1311 Tract Map Reduction c) One (1) sepia original d) Tentative Tract Map application e) Expanded Statement of Project f) Letter of Authorization g) Two (2) copies of property owners list h) Two (2) copies of property owners mailing labels j) Two copies of project sponsor mailing labels k) Title Company letter of Certification 1) Environmental assessment form City and Regional Planning • Site Planning • Environmental Studies • Redevelopment • Housing Zoning Studies • General and Specific Plans • Land Subdivision Design May 3, 1984 Mr. Ramon Diaz CUP/TTM applications Page Two General —T CUP/TTAI/Env. Fees $637.50 b) Title Company map of adjacent property owners Should you have any questions regarding these application requests, please contact me at the above number. Very truly yours, ::T�� Richard J. Smith, AICP Vice President FJS:da Encls. 1 FORK 43 273 PecaOy Peer gaga®, PeOm Desert, C.9=6® %. Y � SUBDIVISION MAP W�mP UWATU N FORM : deper4Uen o1 ®Q vIrommentaQ semle" ° p0en ft dlvg an Richard J . Smith, et al Applicant (pieces print) 960 E . Tahcluitz McCallum Way, Suite 201 (619)322-0900 Mailing Address also ne Palm Springs , CA 92262 Wry StateZip-Code REQUEST: (Demo tbe spsalfie nature of approval rpupnd I. Subdivide an 8 .24 acre parcel into six (6) residential lots and three additional lots for open space, landscape, and private roadway, respectively. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: The subject 8.24 acre property is vacant and located at the base of the Santa Rosa Range. Three hillside pads and an access road have been graded _ into the northerly portion of the site. Flood control district improvements have resulted in the creation of a large fill area at the base of the hillside . ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 631-07-002 EXISTING ZONING HPRD Property Owner Authorise Non The undersloned $fates-that they ore the owner W of the property described herein and hereby give author- isation for the filing of this application. _ are A"ment absolving the City-of Palm Desert-of all nablit"" relative to any Good netridtlons. - - ,l 00 ISY MY SIGNATURE ON THIS AGREEMENT, ve the City of Palm Desert of all aa011N1es regarding airy deed se lailat t mdy he a0pttacbie-to the property described_herein. S _ Signature Date Applicants Signature - A Signature - Door Or (FOR STAFF USE ONLY) ErMronfhWMI a,W- Accepted by: ❑ Ministerial Act E.A.No. (� .. ❑ Categorical Exemption C ASE H01 ❑ Negative Declaration ❑ Other Reference Case No. 0 x _ i - 6�' � 9. 6' I •- - �� } 717 f.f. 'I r 7 J. 71 x � r / / 705 f.f. � a 57 / C41 ,� I �_ LOT A 1 2.9,3 A� SLOT 8 48 AC. LOTS_ - -- J .54 AC. LEGEND g0' SITE ACREAGE: 8.24 AC, 10 669 f.f, i 0% (TOTAL) i. / : J / 1 I I FOOTHILL LOTS: 3.26 AC. 39.6% OF TOTAL DISTURBED ACREAGE: 1.86 AC. 57,1% \ 694 UNDISTURBED ACREAGE: 1.40 AC. 42.9% HILLSIDE 40�' LOTS: 8 A _ 4.9 C. 60.4% OF TOTAL 1, 123' — — — — - 68� f.f . 98' _. T \ 97' 87' f �/ DISTURBED ACREAGE: 0.72 AC. 14.5% TYPICAL SINGLE UNDISTURBED ACREAGE: 4.26 AC. 85.5% FAMILY RESIDENCE �- =- yOT 2 � LOT 3 LOT 4 - // � 682 .k .77 A .5 AC. 1 . 1 .43 AC. .40 AC. / _ __ LOT 5 I — --- -- c� /J // �' \. r iA .43 AC. V' J _ c�� 1 - N LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE AREA 678 f.f. �� I 674 f.f. / t / �� �IIT LOT 6 671 f.f. 668 f.f. j � .63 AC. T E LOT C </ 685 f.f. —__�� 1 ` ' . MAP 64 AC. - - 41 D LOT B .07 AC. 'ism 664.7 - _ ► l Pry { 4 �` O _ s 01 . x tA.d. associates landscape architecture Fm P 980 e. tahquitz-mccallum way E _ ISNER SMITH & ASSOCIATES palm springs, ca. PLANNING CONSULTANTS 477 S. PALM CANYON DR. PALM SPRINGS CA.• (e19) 32s-o97r-- • J a v ' 0 0 0 EX/Jl/N6 �'Oq�,S�ELIA Y<ILLEY o o 's�''�Errd�o 0 1-1� ,rv.�trE.c ,o�.r�r,���/-wgrE,2 l 4/�V o ��� v�/1EY jW eloNl.Qv� N w ' w TENTATIVE i 4D 680 / Q -1 - / x C1' t ,� � ONCJI -� ��y, .^ TRACT MAP N2 20024 677,4 ECONC. ' IN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT r 684. x 4.4 i � �' , -- VICINITY A1Q�° ROCKS COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE , STATE OF CALIFORNIA 7jp 1 6822 685. •• a °u 2 y�. 6816 + N 8,600 - N-s,5a7a4e 4 �/ � _ x x , \� A PORTION OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH E-10,666.076 , 7// T �- x 3 r - , p %'o 3 HALF OF GOVERNMENT LOT 2 IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF ELEV. 720.01 �9 \� • 3/ ® N 11, 137.79 5 FRACTIONAL SECTION 31 TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH RANGE 6 EAST£ I E - 14 , 137.797 � , , `, �► 682. ' 6� ' -- ELEV. 65997 TOTAL TRACT AREA= 8.24 AC. SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN , AS SHOWN BY UNITED 1 = 0.77 A . STATE GOVERNMENTSURVEY, • ' :.� �•` i ' 1 , LOT C RECORDED IN THE OFFICE OF THE �Q , n ,� - , ` % LOT 2 = 0. 52 AC. SQRVEYOR GENERALS ON JLY 15 , 1856. • 5 .� r � I LOT 3 = CJ. 43 AC. LOT 4 = 0.40 AC. OWNER FE BRUA R Y 1984 7497 y , :• v f , LOT 5 = 0.43 AC. RICHARD SMITH et al SCALE 1 �� = 40� x t � LOT 6 = 0. 63 AC. , LOT 7 = O. 54 AC. 960 E.TAHQUITZ -Mc CALLUM WAY \ µ • ' /` �'° `{ it 1 LOT 8 = 0. 88 AC. PALM SPRINGS, CA. 92262 x \ x 703.2 70 x LOT A = 2.93 AC. (OPEN SPACE ) (619 ) 322 0900 WATER SEWER UTILITIES x 6F?f 'r I r LOT B = 0. 07 AC. ( FOR LANDSCAPE PURPOSES ) COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT rn6 x6s3.F �, �� _ LOT C = 0. 64 AC. (FOR PRIVATE ROADWAY PURPOSES) DEVELOPER/SUBDIVIDER 85820 COACHELLA HTS. 7035 /rF. , �� RICHARD SMITH , et of COACHELLA , CA. 92236 960 E.TAHQUITZ - Mc CALLUM WAY (6 9 } 398 - 2651 PALM SPRINGS. CA. 92262 1 v I w 0\ I� EXISTING ZONING - R - l (619) 322- 0900 STORM DRAIN UTILITIES o v COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT x6 4 �' w` 670.9 PROPOSED ZONING - .R - 1 ENGINEER I EXISTING SITE USE - VACANT 85820 COACHELLA HTS. COACHELLA , CA. 92236 7572 v :� _: .. .; � , •, . , , i ; , i � ���_ • .___ � y - s `\, WAGNER - STANFORD CONSULTANTS � - 7 70 N / - (619) 398 2651 74-133 EL PASEO SUITE A-10 f ., /�9�''___•�..._---- .; I °.� �, I � ' PALM DESERT,CA. 92260 N -8,400 (619) 568 - 5696 -757. 3 .7 735.� \ � ' 673.0 �, �Lp-� W % SCALE 1 = 40 1 p x -7G0 i \74V - x A 30,3 1 668.7 ROCKS V. 61, 97 1-► .,.. 6 ~ - - -7?O r.. _. ' , J EX/1'T/Nl+ !/rV0/17l/�,BEO N.4T�•KL G/l0!!NO � � -70D x 721.0 . - 7 x 76 .2 \ ��¢' ,.fir - - - -- /al J x 7 8.7 674.3 - :. I, 6 74.8 I - ' 0 - 6g0 / 00 1 / _ x _J SECTION 8-,8 78D ;.�� �" � -T- \ 1L0 "' UNO TU O , 740 r€ � r, V 0 �'HLINNE[ c 7W /14AD11/AY �1 PdL.H v4LlEY Gd�U , toOD �OriTr,�f! 78.8 al RD,QDIf�4Y ROCK 71 .S' �' i A 74U- r M k° THIS MAP PREPARED BY WAGNER- STANFORD CONSULTANTS IN- 8,001. 706 d \~ II _ = UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF S I N- 8,008.669 E -10,641.098 n _ �= E -II, 152 135 ELEV. 775.0 >>O 760 9~ ' ELEV 667.18 NO «G✓C• 6UlB x7 7.2 lop \ 0 TN/P,('EN ,AV/N6 G.PALIEO.4B�gl � { 776.5r�� I Z 69 AT EOGE 79.9 774.5 67.X 'o `. % , Z ROAD PRIVATE SECTIONS DATE ROBERT B. STANFORD L. S. 4457 797.3 o x \, \ \ / \ NO SCALE x N 1 79J7 74 778.1 \ `� 1 �, � 708 5 i I + / ROCKS 710.4x 1 / 7088 O O COMPILED USING PHOTOGRAMMETRIC METHODS BY 978 ROBERT ✓. LUA'G B ASSOCIATES t79 I 7� I �� f X09.6 / 3955 BIRCH STREET, SUITE 102 �% , • NEW PORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92660 i (714) 540 - 6608 PREPARED BY: W. 0 2 3 2(2 E�MIU69FAMP19 DATE OF PHOTOGRAPHY: 10-20- 83 221 E. WALNUT,SUITE 138 74-133 EL PASEO SUITE A-10 18013-A SKYPARK CIRCLE CONTOUR INTERVAL 2 SLOPE ANALYSIS 19m6% PASADEMIA,CAUFORNIA91101 PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92714 (818)796-3782 (619) 568-569G (714) 250-1470 CIVIL ENGINEERS LAND SURVEYORS O O O HOMEPlE.CO 0� ON,O/.1re/mil/Y,4rE,�.t1.4/iY O 0 CO ' 0 P LOQDO eDrtl,QOL N - _ \ ---_ I yTENTATIVE r - ! _- ----- \ _ l i •Q`� META !//E 7 ------ TRACT MAP NO 20024 � - 1 __o� O . �A / 677.4 0 J - - �\ J j b ' CONC- DESERT � ,_ 4.4 , ; _> � I N THE CITY OF PALM 684 x �� �I o �� y / J y VMI&IrYAt COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE , STATE OF CALIFORNIA v 1 '682.2 685. �-- I I H H SOUTH 2 _ , _ -- 681 6 --\ \ ,-�- -�- = \ ; t N-8,600 - A PORTION OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF E SOU N-8,587.648 - I 7� �,� T _ x 3 _\\ ,; ���. o �, I - -- 3 HALF' OF GOVERNMENT LOT 2 IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF i F-10,66i6.076 1 7// N 8,584,965 FRACTIONAL SECTION 31 TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH RANGE 6 EAST EI.tV. 20.01 \ �9 `\\ _ - \ ��Ifi= - _ -- E - 11 , 137.797 _ > > > 682 \--, 6? /_ -. ELEV 659 97 TOTAL TRACT AREA- 8.24 AC, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN , AS SHOWN BY UNITED �\, at' LOT I = 0.77 AC. STATE GOVERNMENT SURVEY, RECORDED IN THE OFFICE OF THE s < - LOT 2 = 0. 52 AC. SURVEYOR GENERALS ON JULY 15 , 1856. 5 4 '- LOT 3 = 0. 43 AC. \ LOT 4 = 0. 40 AC. r = OWNER FEBRUARY 1984 \ - LOT 5 0. 43 AC. 7497 ` �- ' v �� I r ' LOT 6 = 0. 63 AC. RICHARD SMITH , et al �� _ x �� - 't � � - � �, ,-_ `r � 960 E.TAHQUITZ -Mc CALLUM WAY SCA L E I - 40 / Esc LOT 7 _ 0. 54 AC. PALM SPRINGS , CA. 92262 � _, . - o � -�--_- �; LOT 8 - 0. 88 AC. 69 (619 ) 322- 0900 WATER SEWER UTILITIES \ ' x \ 89fF 70 �,% `t $ \ LOT A = 2. 93 AC. (OPEN SPACE ) q x x703.2 .69¢F \ LOT B = 0. 07 AC. ( FOR LANDSCAPE PURPOSES ) COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT -� �s I _ / x663 l � \ �� ,, , LOT C - 0. 64 AC. (FOR PRIVATE ROADWAY PURPOSES) DEVELOPER SUBDIVIDER 85820 COACHELLA HTS. RICHARD- SMITH et al COACHELLA , CA. 92236 \ 70 5 G68 fP 960 E.TAHQUITZ -Mc CALLUM WAY (619 ) 398 - 2651 _ _ PALM SPRINGS, CA. 92262 o EXISTING ZONING R I - . (619) 322 090o STORM DRAIN UTILITIES 6709 PROPOSED ZONING - .R - I COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT \� x6 4. _ v: I I EXISTING SITE USE - VACANT ENGINEER 8582000ACHELLA HTS. CA. 92236 WAGNER - STANFORD CONSULTANTS COACHELLA ,619) 398 - 251 - 75�7,,2 7 70 N 97 /25It � ' 74-133 EL PASEO SUITE A-10 - /¢9' a PALM DtSERT,CA. 92260 I N -8,400 568 - 5696 I 69 -75 t « + \ \ V I x6 6 6.7 0 a A 7 1.0® - \ vv I G7/ ow j �t �\ ^ _ I I p W � SCALE: I"= 40' -7G0 735� I 673 0 TG �\ 75 O : x 30 3 668.7 M 2 x t �� \ r V 20� - - 2� ,wavw.4Y z ROCKS SELEV 697 UZI 6 I � ` 1 _ A l -- \ \ \ ! / ` _\ \ ., \ EX/.PT/rVG UNO/lTU.�,,�7EO NoZl7144L 4WelA0 ' , C> 2 - _ - ZOT 7 x76 .2 72X.0 �93. � 67¢,�.F / � �� x O ( � - _ --_ - - _-- - - -- - , - - x - - 0 - \ r " i y �.i V \\ 6 0 / /� '' �' 674.8 \ fie,ION "8 Q 10i /6 \ 66 674.8 l/EiPT. t \ . i _ !- , / N - 8,200 x f - - ; r!/ /lam �S/O 1�i0 \\ \ S �76 _- - _ LOT 'A � � 1� 7?0 \ o768 v ,accE rE,o 6g _ /\\ I6 78 8 �f1 it/N x CON�ETE /rVlE//IC6i°lO/1 D/lCCH A- t dY \ _ �! A PB' /!Ijr �E.r-�E.>rr Ox 7� , Z, ROCK - --- \._ \ _ _ �- #' � RED BY WAGNER - STANFORD CONSULTANTS THIS MAP PREPARED PA i I �69 � CO NC C 4 /S / LS 1N- 8 01. 706 N- 8,008,669 _ Y UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF � - > ' E- 10 41.098 -_ 7 _ = I n E -II, 152 135 \ ,r ELEV 667.18 NO «C �Uld E L E 775.0 \ TTo 760 9 9 .4 x 7U \ 0 T/1/P,eEN /AVING G�Ps1LL0.4QEA1' 778.5� 7 7.2 \\�.\ \ Z 6g AT EDGE .QE�t/,QlU.eAL/I� 3- �G>- B¢ /✓ \'•. 0-t, , 79.9 774.5 \ 767.X 6. 'moo \ Z ROAD PRIVATE SECTIONS DATE ROBERT B. STANFORD L. S. 4457 NO SCALE 7 7.4 778.1® 1 708.5__. ®736.9 R O C K S 710 40 O 7088 O 0 COMPILED USING PHOTOGRAMMETRIC METHODS BY x78 .2 0 x � ROBERT ✓. LUII,'G' 6 ASSOCIATES C 792.1 I 3955 BIRCH STREET, SUITE 102 © �g0 76� x09 8 NEW PORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92660 (714) 540 - 6608 >> I \ f� PREPARED BY: W, 0 23212 wA�NI�Q-s�AN�eQe �eNsu`TANTs DATE OF PHOTOGRAPHY. 10-20- 83 221 E.WALNUT,SUITE 138 74-133 EL PASEO SUITE A-10 18013-A SKYPARK CIRCLE CONTOUR INTERVAL 2 PASADENA,CALIFORNIA91101 PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92714 (818)796 -3782 (619) 568-569G (714) ?50-1470 CIVIL ENGINEERS • LAND SURVEYORS r