Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTT 20434 PP 84-49 CONTRY CLUB DRIVE/CONDOS 1984 PRE CIS)E PLAN TENTATIVE TRACTZOz13'� .ONE CHANCE- PARCEL tvlAP VARIANCE U.U.Fl. -- REFF 2 TO: APPLICANT L.00AFION : RE I.JE.ST �_- ' T—��'n '� �� Q EXISTING ZONE: , ,P-5" PREPARATION PROGRESS �_ DATE BY COMMENTS APPLICATION RECEIVED LEGAL PUBLICATION SENT NOTICES SENT 2 § FIELD~ INVESTIGATION DEPTS. NOTIFIED BUILDING J ENGINEERING i �FII E POLICE RECREATION & PARKS 1. SCHOOL DISTRICT DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS FLOOD CONTROL PREI..IMINARY MEETING 2D'--1 w4 1 fv `,4-Ltq STAFF REPORT FINAI_PLAN APPROVAL PRECISE PLAN (6) LANDSCAPING PLAN (5) PLAN. DIRECTOR MOD. (6) HEARINGS & ACTIONS �— DATE ACTION VOTE REVIEW BOARD HEARING K.—HEARING PUBLISHED P.C. PUBLIC HEARING APPLICANT NOTIFIED C.C. PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE NO. _RESOLUTION NO. FFFEC_TIVE DATE RECORDED FOR DATA- BANK ZONING MAP CORRECTED r PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1023 T CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Case No. TT 20434 Department of Environmental Services: 1. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein which are in addition to all the requirements, limitations, and restrictions of all municipal ordinances and state and federal statutes now in force, or which hereafter may be in force. 2. The applicant shall have twenty-four (24) months from the date of the approval or conditional approval of the tentative map for filing of the final map unless an extension of time as permitted by code is granted by planning commission. 3. All on-site utilities, including cable TV, shall be placed underground and shall be completely concealed from view except certain appurtenances as may be approved by the director of environmental services. 4. All dedicated land and/or easements required by this approval shall be granted to the City of Palm Desert, without cost to the city and free of all liens and encumbrances. 9, The CCdcR's for this development shall be submitted to the director of proval by the city attorney prior to environmental services for review and final ap the issuance of any building permits. Prior to recordation of the final subdivision map, the applicant shall submit to the city engineer: a. The document to convey title. b. Covenants and restrictions to be recorded. C. Management and maintenance agreement to be entered into with the owners of the units of the project. 6. Prior to submittal of the final map, the applicant shall provide the department of environmental services with a list of proposed street names with at least three alternatives. The approval of the final street name shall be made by the director of environmental services. 7. All design revisions to tentative tract map required by approval of PP 84-49 shall be made prior to recordation of final map. and ses to omply with 8. Developer requirementsaofnArticle e26.48 s for park the City recreation Palm oDesertc eSubdivision Ordinance. 9, Applicant shall record easement with property owner to west to provide joint driveway on Country Club Drive. 10. Secondary emergency access shall be provided (recorded easement) to satisfaction of city and fire marshal. Provisions for access to be finalized prior to recordation of accompanying tract map or issuance of building permit, whichever occurs first. Emergency access with all weather roadway to public street shall be installed prior to final approval of any dwelling units. Department of Public Works: 11. Drainage and signalization fund fees, as required by city ordinance, shall be paid prior to recordation of the final map. 12. Drainage facilities shall be provided per Ordinance No. 218 and the Master Drainage Plan to the specifications of the director of pubic works.. 13. Storm drain construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study by the private engineer that is approved by the department of public works. -3- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1023 FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED that the conditions of approval do include a requirement that the applicant pay fees to comply,with the requirements of Article 26.48 of the City of Palm Desert Subdivision Ordinance. In return, the City agrees to use said said fees for park purposes in conformance with an adopted master plan, within five (5) years of the recordation of the final map.' PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting offthe Palm Desert h Planning commission, held on this 15th day of January, 1985, by g v wit: AYES: DOWNS, ERWOOD, RICHARDS, WOOD, AND CRITES NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE BUF9RD CRITES, Chairman ATTEST: A RAMON A. DIAZ, Secre Am -2- INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM City of Palm Desert )AN N 7 )985 TO: Director of Environmental Services ENvTYOF PALM SE5vR_f CITY OF PALM DF.ar�Fi-i FROM: Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Tract 20434 R&B Properties DATE: December 19, 1984 The following should be considered conditions of approval : 1) Drainage and signalization fund fees, as required by City ordinance, shall be paid prior to recordation of the final map.. 2) Drainage facilities shall be provided, per Ordinance No. 218 and the Master Drainage Plan, to the specifications of the Director of Public Works. 3) Storm drain construction shall be contingent upon. a drainage study by the private engineer that is approved by the Department of Public Works. 4) Full public improvements, including traffic safety lighting, as required by ordinance and the Director of Public Works, shall be installed in ac- cordance with City standards. 5) Improvement plans for .water and sewer systems shall be approved by the re- spective service districts with "as-built" plans submitted to the Department of Public Works prior to the project final . 6) Complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the City Engineer for checking and approval before construc- tion of any improvements is commenced. The engineer shall submit "as-built" plans prior to the acceptance of the improvements by the City. 7) All private streets shall be inspected by the engineering department and a standard inspection fee shall be paid prior to recordation of map. 8) Landscaping maintenance on Country Club Drive shall be provided by the home- owners association. 9) Existing utilities on Country Club Drive shall be undergrounded. 10) Complete grading plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the City Engineer for checking and approval priorto"issuance; of"any=permits. 11) Dedication of 11 ' feet of right-of-way on Country Club Drive shall be done prior to issuance of any permits and approval of plans. 12) Installation of curb and gutter at 43' from centerline, matching paving and sidewalk on Country Club Drive. 13) Installation of one-half landscaped median in Country Club Drive or cash payment for one-half the cost of landscaped median at the option of the Director of Public Works. 14) Installation of one-half landscaped median in Country Club Drive or cash payment for one-half the cost of landscaped median at the option of the Director of Public Works. 15) Size, number and location of driveways to Public Works specifications with only 1 driveway approach to be allowed to serve this property. 16) A future median break.will not be permitted. 17) Offsite improvement plans to be approved by the Public Works Department and a surety posted to guarantee the required offsite improvements prior to re- cordation of the final map. wkc6jAri earr; McClellan, P.E. ARC:BM/lo AA MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 7, 1985 Chairman Crites closed the public testimony. Action: Moved by Commissioner Erwood, seconded by Commissioner Downs, adopting the findings as presented by staff. Carried 4-0. Moved by Commissioner Erwood, seconded by Commissioner Downs, adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 1040, approving CUP 16-78 Amendment #1. Carried 4-0. F. Case No. PP 85-6 - NICK JORGENSEN, Applicant Request for approval of a precise plan of design to allow construction of three residential apartment units on an 8925 square foot lot on the south side of Driftwood Street 340 feet west of Deep Canyon. Mr. Smith outlined the salient points from the staff report. He explained that after the writing of the report the applicant agreed to comply with the recommendations of staff and would like a continuance to adjust his plan. Chairman Crites opened the public testimony. MR. NICK JORGENSEN, indicated that he had been a long time resident of Palm Desert and that he wanted to comply with all standards of the city. He noted that he would also like to develop additional lots in the future. He nephew explained that his hew would be doing most of the work on the case. P P Chairman Crites asked Mr. Jorgensen if a one month extension would provide plans. Mr. Jorgensen adequate time to revise his p concurred. MR. JOHN JORGENSEN, 27-520 Avenida Terrazo in Cathedral City, explained that they were willing to comply with code. He stated that he would like to begin as soon as possible. Chairman Crites indicated that a two week continuance could be granted to May 21, 1985. Mr. Smith noted that revised plans would have to be turned in by next Monday. MR. JOHN JORGENSEN indicated that he would like to reduce the side setback from between six to ten feet. Mr. Smith noted that the applicant would have to apply for a variance. Chairman Crites closed the public testimony. Action: Moved by Commissioner Downs, seconded by Commissioner Wood, to continue PP 85-6 to May 21, 1985. Carried 4-0. G. Case Nos. PP 84-49 AND(TT 20434 AMENDMENT I11) - R & B PROPERTIES, Applicant Request for approval of an amendment to a precise plan of design to reduce common open space and increase private open space and a tentative tract map to modify the sizes of the lots for a 36 unit planned residential project on 7.25 acres in the PR-5 (planned residential, maximum 5 d.u. per acre on property located on the south side of Country Club Drive, approximately 250 feet east of Sagewood Drive. Mr. Sawa reviewed the staff report and recommended denial. -6- l 1 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 7, 1985 Commissioner Wood asked for clarification on the amount of open space the applicant would be lacking. Mr. Sawa indicated that 50% common space is required and that the applicant was requesting 25% common and 32% as private yard. Chairman Crites opened the public testimony and asked the applicant to address the commission. MR. MIKE HURST indicated that in the third paragraph of his submittal was the reason for the request. He felt that providing a private for some of the units would be an asset to the development. Chairman Crites asked if anyone present wished to speak in FAVOR or OPPOSITION to this case. There being no one, the public testimony was closed. Chairman Crites requested that staff outline specific reasons why this request would be disadvantageous. Mr. Sawa indicated that common open space if available to everyone while private is only available to a specific person. He noted that the code presently requires 50% common open space and that the request would considerably decrease that amount. Commission determined that the request would not meet common open space requirements and felt that the change could not be justified. Action: Moved by Commissioner Wood, seconded by Commissioner Downs, to deny request for amendment. Carried 4-0. H. Case No. PP 85-7 - CITY OF PALM DESERT, Applicant Approval of the design for a fire station at the southwest corner of Portola Avenue and Country Club Drive and a negative declaration of environmental impact. Mr. Joy reviewed the staff report and explained that a letter of opposition had been received to protest the noise from sirens. Staff felt that the fire station was needed for this area and recommended approval. Commissioner Downs asked if the proposed station was large enough to hold a fire engine. Staff concurred. Chairman Crites opened the public testimony and asked if anyone present wished to speak in FAVOR or OPPOSITION to the request. There being none, Chairman Crites closed the public testimony. Action: Moved by Commissioner Downs, seconded by Commissioner Wood, adopting the findings as presented by staff. Carried 4-0. Moved by Commissioner Downs, seconded by Commissioner Wood, adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 1041, approving PP 84-52. Carried 4-0. VIll. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS A. ZONING ORDINANCE CLARIFICATION Determination whether private school is permitted in PR (planned residential) zone. Mr. Sawa outlined the request and asked for a determination from the commission. Chairman Crites asked which zones permit private schools presently. Mr. Sawa replied P zone, and R-1, R-2, and R-3 with a conditional use permit. -7- 1 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NOTICE OF ACTION Date: MAY 8, 1985 R & B PROPERTIES c/o Michael Hurst P.O. Box 1942 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Re: PP 84-49 a dn�434 (A4ndment #1) The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of May 7, 1985. Request was denied. Carried unanimously 4-0. Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the director of environmental services, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. I t/ RAMON A. DIAZ, SECR RY PLANNING COMMISSIO RAD/tm cc: File(s) C.V. Water District City of Palm Desert Department of Environmental Services Staff Report TO: Planning Commission DATE: May 7, 1985 CASE NO: PP 84-49 and 20434 Amendment #0 REQUEST: Approval of an amendment to a precise plan of design to reduce common open space and increase private open space and a tentative tract map to modify the sizes of the lots for a 36 unit planned residential project on 7.25 acres in the PR-5 (planned residential, maximum 5 d.u. per acre on property located on the south side of Country Club Drive, approximately 250 feet east of Sagewood Drive. APPLICANT: R & B PROPERTIES c/o Michael Hurst P.O. Box 1942 Palm Desert, CA 92260 I. BACKGROUND: A. PREVIOUS APPROVAL: This item was originally approved January 15, 1985, by the planning commission, subject to conditions. U. REVISED PROPOSAL: The originally approved plan provided approximately 57% of the site in common open space. This exceeded the required 50% common open space. This was done with the provision for small private patio areas for each unit, also required by code. As permitted by the PR (planned residential) zone requirements the applicant is requesting approval to reduce the common space down to 25% of the site with the 32% balance going to increase the private yards at the rear of the units. The revision to the tentative tract map would be to increase the lot area for each unit to include the proposed private yards. The basic site plan, including streets, recreation (except for tennis court which has been replaced by a small clubhouse), retention area, and number of units has not changed. The applicant's justification is that they can provide a private neighborhood having single family homes in the price range of condominium homes." Additionally, "a more desirable product for the public" will be provided. III. RECOMMENDATION: Staff does not recommend this amendment since the project was originally designed to be a condominium project with maximum common open space. However, the planning commission does have the authority to approve this request should it believe it is warranted. IV. ATTACHMENTS: A. Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 1022 and 1023. B. Letter of request. C. Plans and exhibits. Prepared by 6.0 Seek-. Reviewed and Approved by Am April 18 , 1985 Palm Desert Planning Commission Palm Desert , CA 92260 Re : "The Shadows" Townhomes Project County Club Drive Palm Desert , CA File No . PP 84-49 Resolution TT 20434 Resolutions 1022 ; 1023 Gentlemen : This letter is to inform you of a change in the aforementioned project which was approved by you on January 15 , 1985 . Since the original approval we the developer and the architect , have reassessed the project and re-analyzed its purpose . Based on that reassessment , we would like to request that you amend your approval to delete the provision of the "50% common open space" (defined as landscaping , common areas) . We have retained the basic site layout , the street configuration , the water retention basin and pool area locations, and the basic unit density as originally approved . As you are aware , the development was to be a condominium townhome project with all open common space , except for the footprint of each living unit . The project , as we propose it now , is more of a private community , providing single family homes , each with a private yard , eliminating the public areas except for the frontage at Country Club Drive , the pool area , and the retention basin . This way we can provide a private neighborhood having single family homes in the price range of condominium homes . Overall , a more desirable product for the public . In doing so , however , the common landscaped areas have been reduced from the 50% of site as approved to 250 of site (another 30S being private yards which will also be landscaped , but not as common areas) . Your consideration in amending your original approval of this project to include these concepts would allow us all to provide an overall more desirable product to the consumer . Thank you for your consideration . Singerel T Michael Hurst Architect MH/ds PO , 6OX <<�2- ; - `- '..c s E 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 April 18, 1985 CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE Case Nos. PP 84-49 and TT 20434 (Amendment #1) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by R be B PROPERTIES for approval of an amendment to a previously approved precise plan and tentative tract map for a 36 unit planned residential project on 7.25 acres in the PR-5 zone on property located on the south side of Country Club Drive, approximately 1600 feet east of Monterey Avenue, more particularly described as: APN 622-020-002 cTE; Ga4r.JT GLU cie. IVE F.C. (2) (D.P. 03 -78 b,a.T EE - p0 LRi� P EE Cl N 0 ..E Li. SAC-E�� "J,•aP z9 PR-5 HOVLEY SAID Public Hearing will be held on Tuesday, May 7, 1985, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber at the Palm Desert Civic Center, 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. If you challenge the proposed actions in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the city council (or planning commission) at, or prior to the public hearing. RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary Palm Desert Planning Commission PUBLISH: Desert Post April 26, 1985 Am PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1022 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PRECISE PLAN OF DESIGN AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A 36 UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE, APPROXIMATELY 250 FEET EAST OF SAGEWOOD DRIVE., Case No. PP 84-49' WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 18th day of December, 1984, hold a duly noticed public hearing and continued hearing on January 15, 1985, to consider the request by R & B PROPERTIES for approval of a precise plan of design and negative declaration of environmental impact to allow construction of a 36 unit condominium project on 7.25 acres in the PR-5 zone (planned residential, maximum five dwelling units per acre) on property located on the south side of Country Club Drive, approximately 250 feet east of Sagewood Drive, more particularly described as: APN 622-020-002 WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedures to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 80-89", in that the director of environmental services has determined that the project will not have an adverse impact on the environment and a negative declaration has been prepared. WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said commission did find the following facts and reasons to exist to justify the granting of said precise plan of design: 1. The design of the precise plan will not substantially depreciate property values in the vicinity. 2. The precise plan will not unreasonably interfere with the use or enjoyment of property in the vicinity by the occupants thereof for lawful purposes. 3. The precise plan will not endanger the public peace, health, safety, or general welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the commission in this case. 2. That approval of Precise Plan 84-49 is hereby granted for reasons subject to the attached conditions. 3. That a negative declaration of environmental impact is hereby certified. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 15th day of January, 1985, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: DOWNS, ERWOOD, RICHARDS, WOOD, AND CRITES NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE / BUF RD CRITES, Chairman ATTES RAMON A. DIAZ, Secre r -1- /tin PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1022 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO. PP 84-49 Department of Environmental Services: 1, The development of the property shall conform substantially with exhibits (Case No. PP 84-49) on file with the department of environmental services, as modified by the following conditions. 2. Construction of the total development may be done in codehaes; hoevrt ethe individual phase shall meet or exceed all municipalrequirements degree that the city could consider each phase as a single project. 3. Construction of a portion of said project shall commence within 24 months from the date of final approval unless an extension of time is granted by the planning commission; otherwise said approval shall become null and void and of no effect whatsoever. 4. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein which are in addition to all municipal ordinances and state and federal statutes now in force or which hereafter may be in force. 5. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contemplated by this approval, the applicant shall first obtain permits and/or clearance from the following agencies: Riverside County Department of Health Palm Desert Architectural Commission City Fire Marshal Coachella Valley Water District Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to the Department of Building and Safety at the time of issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. 6. Subdivision shall be provided with six foot high block wall around project (except for approved openings). 7. Applicant shall contact Palm Desert Branch of U.S. Postal Service to coordinate provisions for mail delivery. 8. Vehicular entrance to be designed to provide adequate storage (80 feet minimum) for vehicles, and turnaround in forward direction for rejected vehicles; plan to be approved by the director of environmental services prior to submission of plans to the department of building and safety. 9. All streets to be 32 feet in width and signed for parking on one side only to the satisfaction of the city. 10. Tennis court to be sunk four feet below grade and unlit. it. Provisions for trash pick-up shall be approved by Palm Desert Disposal and city prior to issuance of building permit. ed 12. Applicant shall oof $ 268.00 0ntper unit to or arrangement forands paymentl shall be School presented ito mitigation; p of payment city prior to issuance of building permit. 13. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall provide mitigation measures in the form of fees of $750 per acre for a Fringe-Toed Lizard (UMA INORNATA) habitat preserve. Any fees collected are to be placed in a fund to be used for acquisition of land for a lizard preserve in the Coachella Valley. -2- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1022 14. Applicant shall pay $100 per unit as required by city ordinance for fire site and equipment acquisition. 15. Secondary emergency access shall be provided (recorded easement) to satisfaction of city and fire marshal. Provisions for access to be finalized prior to recordation of accompanying tract map or issuance of building permit, whichever occurs first. Emergency access with all weather roadway to public street shall be installed prior to final approval of any dwelling units. 16. All units shall be provided with rear yard setback of minimum 20 feet, with distance between buildings a 20 feet minimum. 17. Sidewalk to be eight feet wide and meandering. 18. Applicant shall record easement with property owner to west to provide joint driveway on Country Club Drive prior to issuance of any permits. 19. Perimeter wall along Country Club Drive adjacent to '1i' unit to be set back 20 feet from street property line. Department of Public Works: 20. Drainage and signalization fund fees, as required by ordinance, shall be paid prior to recordation of the final map. 21. Drainage facilities shall be provided, per Ordinance No. 218 and the Master Drainage Plan, to the specifications of the director of public works. 22. Storm drain construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study by the private engineer that is approved by the department of public works. 23. Full public improvements, including traffic safety lighting, as required by ordinance and the director of public works, shall be installed in accordance with city standards. 24. Improvement plans for water and sewer systems shall be approved by the respective service districts with "as-built" plans submitted to the department of public works prior to the project final. 25. Complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the city engineer for checking and approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. The engineer shall submit "as-built" plans prior to the acceptance of the improvements by the city. 26. All private streets shall be inspected by the engineering department and a standard inspection fee shall be paid prior to any permit issuance. 27. Landscaping maintenance on Country Club Drive shall be provided by the property owner. 28. Complete grading plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the city engineer for checking and approval prior to issuance of any permits. 29. Dedication of 11 feet of right-of-way on Country Club Drive shall be done prior to issuance of any permits and approval of plans. 30. Installation of curb and gutter, matching paving and sidewalk on Country Club Drive. 31. Installation of one-half landscaped median in Country Club Drive or cash payment for one-half the cost of landscaped median at the option of the director of public works. -3- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1022 32. Size, number, and location of driveways to public works specifications with only one driveway approach to be allowed to service this property. Fire Marshal: 33. Install a water system capable of delivering 2500 GPM fire flow from any fire hydrant for a 2 hour duration in addition to domestic or other sup 1 The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement. Fire flow requirements will depend on built-in fire protection provisions of buildings. so that no point of any building is 34. Riverside f from a fire hydrant measuredsalong approved vehicular travel re Install ways. than 250 feet a. exterior surfaces of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow, and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. b. curbs shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. C. hydrants shall not be located closer than 25 feet to any building. 35. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and 2 copies of the water system plan to the fire marshal for review. Upon approval, one copy will be sent to the building department, and the original will be returned to the developer. 36. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and approved by the water company, with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system in Case Nos. TT 20434 and PP 84-49 is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the fire marshal." 37. Prior to delivery of combustible materials to the building site, the required water system shall be installed, operating, and delivering the required flow. 38. A secondary emergency access will be required, no cul-de-sac over 600 feet. -4- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1023 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP FOR A 36 UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE, APPROXIMATELY 250 FEET EAST OF SAGEWOOD DRIVE. CASE NO. TT 20434 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 18th day of December, 1994, hold a duly noticed public hearing and continued hearing on January 15, 1985, to consider the request of R & B PROPERTIES for approval of a tentative tract map, and negative declaration of environmental impact to allow construction of a 36 unit condominium project on 7.25 acres in the PR-5 zone (planned residential, maximum five dwelling units per acre) on property located on the south side of Country Club Drive, approximately 250 feet east of Sagewood Drive, more particularly described as: APN 622-020-002 WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Procedures to Implement the Californ ia Environmental Quality Act, Palm Desert Proce P determined that Resolution No. 80-89", m that the director of environmental services has determ: the project will not have an adverse impact on the environment and a negative declaration has been prepared. WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Planning Commission did find the following facts and reasons as justified in the staff report dated December 18, 1984, on file in the department of environmental services, to exist to approve the tentative tract map: (a) That the proposed map is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. (b) That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. (c) That the site is physically suitable for the type of development. (d) That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development. (e) That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. (f) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems. (g) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision. WHEREAS, in the review of this tentative tract map the Planning Commission has considered the effect of the contemplated action on the housing needs of the region for purposes of balancing these needs against the public service needs of the residents of the City of Palm Desert and its environs, with available fiscal and environmental resources. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the commission in this case; 2. That it does hereby approve the above described Tentative Map No. 20434 for the reasons set forth in this resolution and subject to the attached conditions. 3. That a negative declaration of environmental impact is hereby approved. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1023 14. Full public improvements, including traffic safety lighting and 8 foot wide meandering sidewalk as required by ordinance and the director of public works, shall be installed in accordance with city standards. 15. Improvement plans for water and sewer systems shall be approved by the respective service districts with "as-built" plans submitted to the department of I ublic works prior to the project final. 16. Complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted as required by ordinance to the city engineer for checking and approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. The subdivider shall submit "as-built" plans prior to acceptance of the subdivision improvements by the city. 17. All private streets shall be inspected by the engineering department and a standard inspection fee shall be paid prior to any permit issuance. 18. Landscaping maintenance on Country Club Drive shall be provided by the property owner. 19. Existing utilities on Country Club Drive shall be undergrounded per each respective utility district's recommendation. 20. Complete grading plans shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the city engineer for checking and approval prior to issuance of any permits. (Soils report to accompany submittal). 21. Dedication of 11 feet of right-of-way on Country Club Drive shall be done prior to issuance of any permits and approval of plans. 22. Installation of curb and gutter, matching paving and sidewalk on Country Club Drive. lf try r cash 23 Installation ne-half he cost aoflland landscaped medianandscaped median lat the noption u Drive o of the director of public yment for o public works. 24. Size, number, and location of driveways to public works specifications with only one driveway approach to be allowed to serve this property. Fire Marshal: 25. Install a water system capable of delivering 2500 GPM fire flow from yny fire hydrant for a 2 hour duration in addition to domestic or other supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement. Fire flow requirements will depend on built-in fire protection provisions of buildings. 26. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants so that no point of any building is more than 250 feet from a fire hydrant measured along approved vehicular travel ways. a. exterior surfaces of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow, and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. b. curbs shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. C. hydrants shall not be located closer than 25 feet to any building. 27. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and 2 copies of the water system plan to the fire marshal for review. Upon approval, one copy will be sent to the building department, and the original will be returned to the developer. 28. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and approved by the water company, with the following certification: "I certify that the design -4- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1023 of the water system in Case Nos. TT 20434 and PP 84-49 is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the fire marshal." 29. Prior to delivery of combustible materials to the building site, the required water system shall be installed, operating, and delivering the required flow. 30. A secondary emergency access will be required, no cul-de-sac over 600 feet. I -5- 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NOTICE OF ACTION Date: JANUARY 21, 1985 R & B PROPERTIES ROBERT RICCIARDI AND ASSOCIATES c/o R. Guillory 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane P.O. Box 651 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Clackamas, OR 97015 Re: PP 84-49 a TT 20434 The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of January 15, 1985. Approved by Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 1022 and 1023. Carried 5-0. Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the director of environmental services, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. f � . Z. d�) RAMON A. DIAZ, SECR RY PLANNING COMMISSIO RAD/tm cc: File(s) C.V. Water District MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION JANUARY 15, 1985 VII. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Continued Case Nos. PP 84-49 and T� R & B PROPERTIES, Applicant Request for approval of a precise plan of design, tentative tract map, and negative declaration of environmental impact to allow construction of a 36 unit condominium project on 7.25 acres in the PR-5 zone (planned residential, maximum five dwelling units per acre) on property located on the south side of Country Club Drive, approximately 250 feet east of Sagewood Avenue. Mr. Sawa reviewed the background for the continuance of the case from the last meeting, gave an overview of the staff report, and recommended approval, subject to conditions. Commission discussed location and lot sizes.. Commissioner Downs inquired if there were any drainage problems. Mr. Cablay replied that at the rear, drainage is the same southeasterly direction. He indicated that the applicant would have to construct his part of the Master Drain Plan. Mr. Diaz noted that fire department provisions would be the responsibility of the fire marshal. Chairman Crites opened the public hearing and asked the applicant to address the commission. MR. ROBERT RICCARDI, 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane, Palm Desert, explained that drainage had been addressed on the tentative tract map. He indicated that he would work with staff to have a retention basin and that only one place between the buildings did not meet 20 feet distance. Chairman Crites asked the applicant if he had any objection to a second pool. Mr. Riccardi replied no, but indicated that if a retention basin was used there would not be adequate room. Mr. Sawa noted that an added condition could be added that an additional swimming pool be provided unless area is needed for retention basin. Mr. Cablay explained that public works would conduct a study before construction. Commissioner Richards expressed concern regarding the need of a second pool in the proposed location. Commissioner Wood asked if some units would be two story town houses. Mr. Riccardi replied yes. After discussion it was decided that a second pool was not needed. Chairman Crites asked if anyone present wished to speak in FAVOR or OPPOSITION to this case. Hearing no one, the public testimony was closed. Action: Moved by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner Wood, to approve the findings as presented by staff. Carried 5-0. Moved by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner Wood, adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 1022, approving PP 84-49, subject to conditions as amended. Carried 5-0. Moved by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner Wood, adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 1023, approving TT 20434, subject to conditions. Carried 5-0. B. Case Nos. GPA 84-3, C/Z 84-18, and PM 20560 -MONTEREY AVENUE ASSOCIATES, Applicant Request for approval of a general plan amendment from low density residential (3-5 du/acre) to district commercial for a 22.1 gross acres, a preannexation change of zone from W-2-20 (Riverside County zoning) to PC (2) (district commercial) for 22.1 gross acres and PR-5 (planned -2- 4 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1023 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP FOR A 36 UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE, APPROXIMATELY 250 FEET EAST OF S6 WOOD DRIVE. CASE NO. T 20434 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 18th day of December, 1984, hold a duly noticed public hearing and continued hearing on January 15, 1985, to consider the request of R & B PROPERTIES for approval of a tentative tract map, and negative declaration of environmental impact to allow construction of a 36 unit condominium project on 7.25 acres in the PR-5 zone (planned residential, maximum five dwelling units per acre) on property located on the south side of Country Club Drive, approximately 250 feet east of Sagewood Drive, more particularly described as: APN 622-020-002 WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedures to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 80-8911, in that the director of environmental services has determined that the project will not have an adverse impact on the environment and a negative declaration has been prepared. WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Planning Commission did find the following facts and reasons as justified in the staff report dated December 18, 1984, on file in the department of environmental services, to exist to approve the tentative tract map: (a) That the proposed map is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. (b) That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. (c) That the site is physically suitable for the type of development. (d) That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development. (e) That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. (f) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems. (g) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision. WHEREAS, in the review of this tentative tract map the Planning Commission has considered the effect of the contemplated action on the housing needs of the region for purposes of balancing these needs against the public service needs of the residents of the City of Palm Desert and its environs, with available fiscal and environmental resources. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the commission in this case; 2. That it does hereby approve the above described Tentative Map No. 20434 for the reasons set forth in this resolution and subject to the attached conditions. 3. That a negative declaration of environmental impact is hereby approved. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1023 FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED that the conditions of approval do include a requirement that the applicant pay fees to comply with the requirements of Article 26.48 of the City of Palm Desert Subdivision Ordinance. In return, the City agrees to use said said fees for park purposes in conformance with an adopted master plan, within five (5) years of the recordation of the final map. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 15th day of January, 1985, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: DOWNS, ERWOOD, RICHARDS, WOOD, AND CRITES NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE BUFF RD CRITES, Chairman ATTEST: r ' RAMON A. DIAZ, Secre AM -2- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1023 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Case No. TT 20434 Department of Environmental Services: 1. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein which are in addition to all the requirements, limitations, and restrictions of all municipal ordinances and state and federal statutes now in force, or which hereafter may be in force. 2. The applicant shall have twenty-four (24) months from the date of the approval or conditional approval of the tentative map for filing of the final map unless an extension of time as permitted by code is granted by planning commission. 3. All on-site utilities, including cable TV, shall be placed underground and shall be completely concealed from view except certain appurtenances as may be approved by the director of environmental services. 4. All dedicated land and/or easements required by this approval shall be granted to the City of Palm Desert, without cost to the city and free of all liens and encumbrances. 5. The CC&R's for this development shall be submitted to the director of environmental services for review and final approval by the city attorney prior to the issuance of any building permits. Prior to recordation of the final subdivision map, the applicant shall submit to the city engineer: a. The document to convey title. b. Covenants and restrictions to be recorded. C. Management and maintenance agreement to be entered into with the owners of the units of the project. 6. Prior to submittal of the final map, the applicant shall provide the department of environmental services with a list of proposed street names with at least three alternatives. The approval of the final street name shall be made by the director of environmental services. 7. All design revisions to tentative tract map required by approval of PP 84-49 shall be made prior to recordation of final map. 8. Developer shall pay in-lieu fees for park and recreation purposes to comply with the requirements of Article 26.48 of the City of Palm Desert Subdivision Ordinance. 9. Applicant shall record easement with property owner to west to provide joint driveway on Country Club Drive. 10. Secondary emergency access shall be provided (recorded easement) to satisfaction of city and fire marshal. Provisions for access to be finalized prior to recordation of accompanying tract map or issuance of building permit, whichever occurs first. Emergency access with all weather roadway to public street shall be installed prior to final approval of any dwelling units. Department of Public Works: 11. Drainage and signalization fund fees, as required by city ordinance, shall be paid prior to recordation of the final map. 12. Drainage facilities shall be provided per Ordinance No. 218 and the Master Drainage Plan to the specifications of the director of pubic works. 13. Storm drain construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study by the private engineer that is approved by the department of public works. -3- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1023 14. Full public improvements, including traffic safety lighting and 8 foot wide meandering sidewalk as required by ordinance and the director of public works, shall be installed in accordance with city standards. 15. Improvement plans for water and sewer systems shall be approved by the respective service districts with "as-built" plans submitted to the department of public works prior to the project final. 16. Complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted as required by ordinance to the city engineer for checking and approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. The subdivider shall submit "as-built" plans prior to acceptance of the subdivision improvements by the city. 17. All private streets shall be inspected by the engineering department and a standard inspection fee shall be paid prior to any permit issuance. 18. Landscaping maintenance on Country Club Drive shall be provided by the property owner. 19. Existing utilities on Country Club Drive shall be undergrounded per each respective utility district's recommendation. 20. Complete grading plans shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the city engineer for checking and approval prior to issuance of any permits. (Soils report to accompany submittal). 21. Dedication of 11 feet of right-of-way on Country Club Drive shall be done prior to issuance of any permits and approval of plans. 22. Installation of curb and gutter, matching paving and sidewalk on Country Club Drive. 23. Installation of one-half landscaped median in Country Club Drive or cash payment for one-half the cost of landscaped median at the option of the director of public works. 24. Size, number, and location of driveways to public works specifications with only one driveway approach to be allowed to serve this property. Fire Marshal: 25. Install a water system capable of delivering 2500 GPM fire flow from any fire hydrant for a 2 hour duration in addition to domestic or other supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement. Fire flow requirements will depend on built-in fire protection provisions of buildings. 26. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants so that no point of any building is more than 250 feet from a fire hydrant measured along approved vehicular travel ways. a. exterior surfaces of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow, and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. b. curbs shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. C. hydrants shall not be located closer than 25 feet to any building. 27. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and 2 copies of the water system plan to the fire marshal for review. Upon approval, one copy will be sent to the building department, and the original will be returned to the developer. 28. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and approved by the water company, with the following certification: "I certify that the design -4- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1023 of the water system in Case Nos. TT 20434 and PP 84-49 is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the fire marshal." 29. Prior to delivery of combustible materials to the building site, the required water system shall be installed, operating, and delivering the required flow. 30. A secondary emergency access will be required, no cul-de-sac over 600 feet. -5- MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION DECEMBER 18, 1985 VII. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Case Nos. PP 84-49 an TT 20434 - do B PROPERTIES, Applicant Request for approval of a precise plan of design, tentative tract map, and negative declaration of environmental impact to allow construction of a 36 unit condominium project on 7.25 acres in the PR-5 zone (planned residential, maximum five dwelling units per acre) on property located on the south side of Country Club Drive, approximately 250 feet east of Sagewood Avenue. Mr. Sawa reviewed the staff report and recommended approval with changes to the setback and joint driveway. Chairman Crites opened the public testimony and asked the applicant to address the commission. Since the applicant was not present Chairman Crites asked if anyone present wished to speak in FAVOR or OPPOSITION. to this project. There were no persons wishing to speak. Mr. Diaz felt the public amenities should be upgraded. Commission felt that due to the absence of the applicant and unanswerable questions that should be dealt with this case should be continued to January 15, 1985. Action: Moved by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner Wood, to continue this case to the January 15, 1984, meeting at 2:00. Carried 5-0. B. Case Nos. CUP 84-11, C/Z 84-17 - DEEP CANYON LTD., Applicant Request for approval of a conditional use permit and change of zone from R-3 to C-1 to allow conversion of manager's and owner's residences into hotel units at an existing hotel, located at the northwest corner of Deep Canyon and Abronia. Mr. Joy reviewed the staff report and suggested approval of the findings and adoption of Planning Commission Resolution No. 1019 recommending approval of CUP 84-11 and C/Z 84-17 to the city council. It was explained also that the applicant suggested placing a bond to assure that the parking would be provided next summer, not during the "season." Commissioner Wood asked for and received clarification on the reason for the bond. Commissioner Richards felt that the parking had not changed significantly. He suggested that the four additional parking spaces be left until staff monitored the parking activities during this season. If problems occured, the additional parking spaces could be added after review. Chairman Crites asked if there would no longer be an off-site manager. Mr. Joy replied that there would still be a manager. Mr. Joy also indicated that conditions #4 and #7 would be deleted because they no longer applied to the project. Chairman Crites opened the public hearing and asked the applicant to address the - commission. MR. WAYNE GURALNICK, 74-399 Highway 111, Palm Desert, attorney for the project said that he concurred with the staff report and requested approval. He thanked the commission regarding the retention on landscaping and suggested a bond be posted. After a study if the parking was not needed, the bond could be released. -2- City of Palm Desert Department of Environmental Services Staff Report TO: Planning Commission DATE: December 18, 1984 CASE NO: PP 84-49 and TT 20434 REQUEST: Approval of a precise plan of design, tentative tract map, and negative declaration of environmental impact to allow construction of a 36 unit condominium project on 7.25 acres in the PR-5 zone (planned residential, maximum five dwelling units per acre) on property located on the south side of Country Club Drive, approximately 250 feet east of Sagewood Avenue. APPLICANT: R do B PROPERTIES c/o R. Guillory P.O. Box 651 Clackamas, OR 97015 ARCHITECT: ROBERT RICCIARDI AND ASSOCIATES 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, CA 92260 I. BACKGROUND: A. DESCRIPTION OF SITE: The property is a long rectangular site with 247 feet of frontage on Country Club Drive and 1267 feet of depth. The land is vacant and slopes slightly to the southeast. B. ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE: North: W-2 (Riverside Co.)/Mobile Home Park South: PR-5/Vacant East: PR-5/Vacant (512 unit apartment approved) West: P/Foundation for the Retarded. C. GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION: Low density residential, 3-5 du/acre. D. PREVIOUS PERTINENT CASES: DP 03-79, TT 14805, and 183 MF, KAUL CONSTRUCTION CO.; 36 unit condominium project approved on May 29, 1984; approval expired June 14, 1983. IL PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A. GENERAL: The proposed project consists of 36 condominium units built in 18 duplexes. The site plan and unit designs are basically the same as that approved in 1979 for Kaul Construction. B. SITE DESIGN, CIRCULATION, AND PARKING: Because of the long, deep shape of the property site, design opporunities are limited. A number of the units are shown with setbacks of 10 to 15 feet adjacent to the interior side perimeter property lines. While the code does not specify a setback, staff feels a setback of 20 feet would be desirable to eliminate a closed-in feeling and impact on adjacent properties. This may mean that the front building lines may have to line up, but the project is small enough that it would not be detrimental to do that. The twenty feet PP 84-49, TT 20434 Continued between strucutres which is not provided in all cases should also be maintained as is required by code. These requirements would be consistent with the 1979 approval. There is only one access to Country Club Drive from the private street which is basically a long dead end cul-de-sac. As was required in 1979, a second emergency access to either the east or west will need to be provided, with arrangements made prior to recording the tract map or submitting final plans to the department of building and safety, whichever comes first. Additionally, that emergency access will need to be provided with an all weather access to Country Club Drive on the adjacent property by the time the first unit is finaled. Staff has talked to the applicant's architect who agreed to attempt to obtain a joint driveway with the Foundation of the Retarded to the west, since their driveways are within ten feet of each other. This will also increase chances that a left-turn median break will be permitted. The architect's plan shows all the roads to be 32 feet in width which permits on-street parking on one side of the street. Each unit is provided with an attached two car garage. Additional guest parking is provided on the driveway apron which is 20 feet deep and on the street as previously noted. There are ten additional parking bays provided on the site. C. ARCHITECTURE: As previously noted, the units would be provided as duplexes. Three different unit types varying from 1458 to 1785 square feet in area are provided in three duplex configurations. Two of the types would be one story in height (16 feet). The largest unit which would combine in to a duplex would be two stories in height (23.5 feet). Two of the unit types will be provided with a private garden entry. The units would be spanish in nature with exterior materials consisting of stucco walls, wood trim, and tile roofing. D. LANDSCAPING AND RECREATIONAL FACILITIES: The proposed plan complys with the applicable 40% of the site landscaping requirement. Recreational facilities proposed would consist of a pool/spa and a tennis court. The tennis court should be sunk four feet below grade and unlit. no walls are shown on the plans at this time. A six foot high decorative block wall must be provided around the entire site. Along Country Club Drive, it must be setback sufficiently to provide an eight foot wide meandering sidewalk and landscaping. Along the west side the Foundation for the Retarded has built a six foot high wall adjacent to their area of construction to date. E. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP: The tentative tract map proposes 37 lots, which is the same as before. Thirty-six lots are for the units while one lot would be for the common area. III. ANALYSIS: A. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL OF A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP: 1. The design of the precise plan will not substantially depreciate property values in the vicinity. Justification: The use is attractive and acceptable from a design aspect and compatible with other uses existing in the vicinity. -2- PP 84-49, TT 20434 Continued 2. The precise plan will not unreasonably interfere with the use or enjoyment of property in vicinity by the occupants thereof for lawful purposes. Justification: The surrounding land in the vicinity is zoned for the same type of use as proposed and owners would not be deprived the use of their land. 3. The precise plan will not endanger the public peace, health, safety, or general welfare. Justification: The project, as conditioned, is designed in a manner that will not endanger the public peace, health, safety, or general welfare due to compliance with existing code requirements. Staff feels these findings can be justified in this case. B. FINDINGS NEEDED FOR APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP: 1. That the proposed map is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. Justification: The proposed map is consistent with the zoning and general plan designation of 3-5 du/acre. 2. That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. Justification: All public streets will be dedicated and improved and sufficient drainage facilities will be provided in conformance with the general plan guidelines and city ordinances. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the type of development. Justification: The 7.25 acre site is of sufficient size to accommodate the proposed project and the topography of the site does not create significant problems. 4. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development. Justification: The design of the project indicates that the site is suitable for the proposed density of development because the site can be served by respective utilities, the city and existing or proposed circulation system. 5. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. Justification: The design will not cause substantial environmental damage or injure fish or wildlife or their habitat because it will be constructed in compliance with applicable regulations and the proposed negative declaration has determined that there will be no related adverse environmental effect which cannot be mitigated. 6. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems. -3- PP 84-49, TT 20434 Continued Justification: The design will not cause serious public health problems because it will be in compliance with applicable health, safety, and building codes. 7. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. Justification: There have been no easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. Staff feels these findings can be justified in this case. C. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The project will not have a significant affect on the environment and a negative declaration of environmental impact has been prepared. Three major environmental impacts which have been documented are those of the impact on the fringe-toed lizard, school facilities, and fire facilities. As mitigation fees, $750 dollars per acre will need to be paid in the appropriate fund for the fringe-toed lizard. For the school mitigation $628 dollars per unit will be required while $100 per unit will be required to mitigate the fire impact. III. CONCLUSIONS: The project is designed in a manner which is acceptable provided the conditions as recommended by staff are complied with. IV. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends: A. Adoption of the findings; B. Adoption of Planning Commission Resolution No. , approving PP 84-49, subject to conditions. C. Adoption of Planning Commission Resolution No. , approving TT 20434, subject to conditions. VII. ATTACHMENTS: A. Draft Resolutions B. Legal Notice C. Negative Declaration and Initial Study D. Comments from City Departments and Agencies E. Plans and Exhibits '� , e Prepared by =l 7CAr[t Reviewed and Approved by AM -4- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PRECISE PLAN OF DESIGN AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A 36 UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE, APPROXIMATELY 250 FEET EAST OF SAGEWOOD DRIVE. Case No. PP 84-49 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 18th day of December, 1984, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider the request by R & B PROPERTIES for approval of a precise plan of design and negative declaration of environmental impact to allow construction of a 36 unit condominium project on 7.25 acres in the PR-5 zone (planned residential, maximum five dwelling units per acre) on property located on the south side of Country Club Drive, approximately 250 feet east of Sagewood Drive, more particularly described as: APN 622-020-002 WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedures to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 80-89", in that the director of environmental services has determined that the project will not have an adverse impact on the environment and a negative declaration has been prepared. WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said commission did find the following facts and reasons to exist to justify the granting of said precise plan of design: 1. The design of the precise plan will not substantially depreciate property values in the vicinity. 2. The precise plan will not unreasonably interfere with the use or enjoyment of property in the vicinity by the occupants thereof for lawful purposes. 3. The precise plan will not endanger the public peace, health, safety, or general welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the commission in this case. 2. That approval of Precise Plan 84-49 is hereby granted for reasons subject to the attached conditions. 3. That a negative declaration of environmental impact is hereby certified. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 18th day of December, 1984, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: BUFORD CRITES, Chairman ATTEST: RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary Am _1_ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO. PP 84-49 Department of Environmental Services: 1. The development of the property shall conform substantially with exhibits (Case No. PP 84-49) on file with the department of environmental services, as modified by the following conditions. 2. Construction of the total development may be done in phases; however, each individual phase shall meet or exceed all municipal code requirements to the degree that the city could consider each phase as a single project. 3. Construction of a portion of said project shall commence within 24 months from the date of final approval unless an extension of time is granted by the planning commission; otherwise said approval shall become null and void and of no effect whatsoever. 4. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein which are in addition to all municipal ordinances and state and federal statutes now in force or which hereafter may be in force. 5. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contemplated by this approval, the applicant shall first obtain permits and/or clearance from the following agencies: Riverside County Department of Health Palm Desert Architectural Commission City Fire Marshal Coachella Valley Water District Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to the Department of Building and Safety at the time of issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. 6. Subdivision shall be provided with six foot high block wall around project (except for approved openings). 7. Applicant shall contact Palm Desert Branch of U.S. Postal Service to coordinate provisions for mail delivery. 8. Vehicular entrance to be designed to provide adequate storage (80 feet minimum) for vehicles, and turnaround in forward direction for rejected vehicles; plan to be approved by the director of environmental services prior to submission of plans to the department of building and safety. 9. All streets to be 32 feet in width and signed for parking on one side only to the satisfaction of the city. 10. Tennis court to be sunk four feet below grade and unlit. 11. Provisions for trash pick-up shall be approved by Palm Desert Disposal and city prior to issuance of building permit. 12. Applicant shall pay $628.00 per unit to Desert Sands Unified School District for mitigation; proof of payment or arrangement for payment shall be presented to city prior to issuance of building permit. 13. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall provide mitigation measures in the form of fees of $750 per acre for a Fringe-Toed Lizard (UMA INORNATA) habitat preserve. Any fees collected are to be placed in a fund to be used for acquisition of land for a lizard preserve in the Coachella Valley. -2- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14. Applicant shall pay $100 per unit as required by city ordinance for fire site and equipment acquisition. 15. Secondary emergency access shall be provided (recorded easement) to satisfaction of city and fire marshal. Provisions for access to be finalized prior to recordation of accompanying tract map or issuance of building permit, whichever occurs first. Emergency access with all weather roadway to public street shall be installed prior to final approval of any dwelling units. 16. All units shall be provided with rear yard setback of minimum 20 feet, with distance between buildings a 20 feet minimum. 17. Sidewalk to be eight feet wide and meandering. 18. Applicant shall attempt to obtain recorded easement with property owner to west to provide joint driveway on Country Club Drive. Department of Public Works: 19. Drainage and signalization fund fees, as required by ordinance, shall be paid prior to recordation of the final map. 20. Drainage facilities shall be provided, per Ordinance No. 218 and the Master Drainage Plan, to the specifications of the director of public works. 21. Storm drain construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study by the private engineer that is approved by the department of public works. 22. Full public improvements, including traffic safety lighting, as required by ordinance and the director of public works, shall be installed in accordance with city standards. 23. Improvement plans for water and sewer systems shall be approved by the respective service districts with "as-built" plans submitted to the department of public works prior to the project final. 24. Complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the city engineer for checking and approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. The engineer shall submit "as-built" plans prior to the acceptance of the improvements by the city. 25. All private streets shall be inspected by the engineering department and a standard inspection fee shall be paid prior to any permit issuance. 26. Landscaping maintenance on Country Club Drive shall be provided by the property owner. 27. Complete grading plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the city engineer for checking and approval prior to issuance of any permits. 28. Dedication of 11 feet of right-of-way on Country Club Drive shall be done prior to issuance of any permits and approval of plans. 29. Installation of curb and gutter, matching paving and sidewalk on Country Club Drive. 30. Installation of one-half landscaped median in Country Club Drive or cash payment for one-half the cost of landscaped median at the option of the director of public works. 31. Size, number, and location of driveways to public works specifications with only one driveway approach to be allowed to service this property. -3- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. Fire Marshal: 32. Install a water system capable of delivering 2500 GPM fire flow from any fire hydrant for a 2 hour duration in addition to domestic or other supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement. Fire flow requirements will depend on built-in fire protection provisions of buildings. 33. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants so that no point of any building is more than 250 feet from a fire hydrant measured along approved vehicular travel ways. a. exterior surfaces of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow, and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. b. curbs shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. C. hydrants shall not be located closer than 25 feet to any building. 34. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and 2 copies of the water system plan to the fire marshal for review. Upon approval, one copy will be sent to the building department, and the original will be returned to the developer. 35. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and approved by the water company, with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system in Case Nos. TT 20434 and PP 84-49 is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the fire marshal." 36. Prior to delivery of combustible materials to the building site, the required water system shall be installed, operating, and delivering the required flow. 37. A secondary emergency access will be required, no cul-de-sac over 600 feet. -4- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP FOR A 36 UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE, APPROXIMATELY 250 FEET EAST OF SAGEWOOD DRIVE. CASE NO. TT 20434 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 18th day of December, 1984, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider the request of R & B PROPERTIES for approval of a tentative tract map, and negative declaration of environmental impact to allow construction of a 36 unit condominium project on 7.25 acres in the PR-5 zone (planned residential, maximum five dwelling units per acre) on property located on the south side of Country Club Drive, approximately 250 feet east of Sagewood Drive, more particularly described as: APN 622-020-002 WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedures to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 80-89", in that the director of environmental services has determined that the project will not have an adverse impact on the environment and a negative declaration has been prepared. WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Planning Commission did find the following facts and reasons as justified in the staff report dated December 18, 1984, on file in the department of environmental services, to exist to approve the tentative tract map: (a) That the proposed map is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. (b) That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. (c) That the site is physically suitable for the type of development. (d) That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development. (e) That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. (f) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems. (g) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision. WHEREAS, in the review of this tentative tract map the Planning Commission has considered the effect of the contemplated action on the housing needs of the region for purposes of balancing these needs against the public service needs of the residents of the City of Palm Desert and its environs, with available fiscal and environmental resources. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the commission in this case; 2. That it does hereby approve the above described Tentative Map No. 20434 for the reasons set forth in this resolution and subject to the attached conditions. 3. That a negative declaration of environmental impact is hereby approved. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED that the conditions of approval do include a requirement that the applicant pay fees to comply with the requirements of Article 26.48 of the City of Palm Desert Subdivision Ordinance. In return, the City agrees to use said said fees for park purposes in conformance with an adopted master plan, within five (5) years of the recordation of the final map. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 18th day of December, 1984, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: BUFOR1 CRITES, Chairman ATTEST: RAMON A DDIAZ, Secretary Am -2- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Case No. TT 20434 Department of Environmental Services: 1. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein which are in addition to all the requirements, limitations, and restrictions of all municipal ordinances and state and federal statutes now in force, or which hereafter may be in force. 2. The applicant shall have twenty-four (24) months from the date of the approval or conditional approval of the tentative map for filing of the final map unless an extension of time as permitted by code is granted by planning commission. 3. All on-site utilities, including cable TV, shall be placed underground and shall be completely concealed from view except certain appurtenances as may be approved by the director of environmental services. 4. All dedicated land and/or easements required by this approval shall be granted to the City of Palm Desert, without cost to the city and free of all liens and encumbrances. 5. The CC&R's for this development shall be submitted to the director of environmental services for review and final approval by the city attorney prior to the issuance of any building permits. Prior to recordation of the final subdivision map, the applicant shall submit to the city engineer: a. The document to convey title. b. Covenants and restrictions to be recorded. C. Management and maintenance agreement to be entered into with the owners of the units of the project. 6. Prior to submittal of the final map, the applicant shall provide the department of environmental services with a list of proposed street names with at least three alternatives. The approval of the final street name shall be made by the director of environmental services. 7. All design revisions to tentative tract map required by approval of PP 84-49 shall be made prior to recordation of final map. 8. Developer shall pay in-lieu fees for park and recreation purposes to comply with the requirements of Article 26.48 of the City of Palm Desert Subdivision Ordinance. 9. Applicant shall attempt to obtain recorded easement with property owner to west to provide joint driveway on Country Club Drive. Department of Public Works: 10. Drainage and signalization fund fees, as required by city ordinance, shall be paid prior to recordation of the final map. 11. Drainage facilities shall be provided per Ordinance No. 218 and the Master Drainage Plan to the specifications of the director of pubic works. 12. Storm drain construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study by the private engineer that is approved by the department of public works. 13. Full public improvements, including traffic safety lighting and 8 foot wide meandering sidewalk as required by ordinance and the director of public works, shall be installed in accordance with city standards. 14. Improvement plans for water and sewer systems shall be approved by the respective service districts with "as-built" plans submitted to the department of public works prior to the project final. -3- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15. Complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted as required by ordinance to the city engineer for checking and approval before construction of any improvements is commenced.. The subdivider shall submit "as-built" plans prior to acceptance of the subdivision improvements by the city. 16. All private streets shall be inspected by the engineering department and a standard inspection fee shall be paid prior to any permit issuance. 17. Landscaping maintenance on Country Club Drive shall be provided by the property owner. 18. Existing utilities on Country Club Drive shall be undergrounded per each respective utility district's recommendation. 19. Complete grading plans shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the city engineer for checking and approval prior to issuance of any permits. (Soils report to accompany submittal). 20. Dedication of 11 feet of right-of-way on Country Club Drive shall be done prior to issuance of any permits and approval of plans. 21. Installation of curb and gutter, matching paving and sidewalk on Country Club Drive. 22. Installation of one-half landscaped median in Country Club Drive or cash payment for one-half the cost of landscaped median at the option of the director of public works. 23. Size, number, and location of driveways to public works specifications with only one driveway approach to be allowed to serve this property. Fire Marshal: 24. Install a water system capable of delivering 2500 GPM fire flow from any fire hydrant for a 2 hour duration in addition to domestic or other supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement. Fire flow requirements will depend on built-in fire protection provisions of buildings. 25. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants so that no point of any building is more than 250 feet from a fire hydrant measured along approved vehicular travel ways. a. exterior surfaces of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow, and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. b. curbs shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. C. hydrants shall not be located closer than 25 feet to any building. 26. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and 2 copies of the water system plan to the fire marshal for review. Upon approval, one copy will be sent to the building department, and the original will be returned to the developer. P a 27. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and approved by the water company, with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system in Case Nos. TT 20434 and PP 84-49 is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the fire marshal." 28. Prior to delivery of combustible materials to the building site, the required water system shall be installed, operating, and delivering the required flow. 29. A secondary emergency access will be required, no cul-de-sac over 600 feet. -4- November 309 1984 CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE Case Nos. PP 84-49 and TT 20434 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by R do B PROPERTIES for approval of a precise plan of design, tentative tract map, and negative declaration of environmental impact to allow construction of a 36 unit condominium project on 7.25 acres in the PR-5 zone (planned residential, maximum 5 dwelling units per acre on property located on the south side of Country Club Drive, approximately 1600 feet east of Monterey Avenue, more particularly described as: APN 622-020-002 7 E3 P.C. (2) (D.P. 03-78 a� y $ILMI FE f 4,, c P R- 2 8,CC0 (8) s i1.00eN aPcwrp, FF L1. pj p� 0 gvrna'e tl. SA6E'� I ti V V G R_5 = f HOVL Y I 1 SAID Public Hearing will be held on Tuesday, December 189 1984, at 2:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber at the Palm Desert Civic Center, 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary Palm Desert Planning Commission PUBLISH: Desert Post December 79 1984 AM 1 (UL.bar oO inn =)Q!9=(�320'a� 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 NEGATIVE DECLARATION (Pursuant to Title 14, Division 6, Article 7, Section 150839 of the California Administrative Code). Case No: PP 84-49 and TT 20434 Applicant/Project Sponsor: R do B PROPERTIES, P.O. Box 651, Clackamas, Oregon 97015. Project Descri lion/Location: Thirty-six (36) unit condominium project on 7.25 acres in t e PR-5 zone located on the south side of Country Club Drive, approximately 250 feet east of Sagewood Drive. The director of environmental services, City of Palm Desert, California, has found that the described project will not have a significant effect on the environment. A copy of the initial study has been attached to document the reasons in support of this finding. Mitigation measures, if any, included in the project to avoid potentially significant effects, may also be found attached. RAMON A. DIAZ DATE Director of Environmental Services RAD/trn ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION CHECKLIST EXPLANATION OF "YES" AND "MAYBE" ANSWERS, POSSIBLE MITIGATION MEASURES AND COMMENTS. Case Nos. PP 84-49 and TT 20434 1. EARTH proposal osal will result in a thane in the natural topography C. This P g by virtue of grading, landscaping, paving, and construction activities associated with development of the property. No mitigation measures required. e. This proposal may result in wind erosion of soil due to temporary construction. Mitigation of impacts will occur by compliance with city requirements for watering during grading and construction phases. 3. WATER b. This proposal will result in a change in absorption rates, drainage patterns and the rate and amount of surface runoff by virtue of development. Compliance with applicable grading ordinances and payment of drainage fees at time of development will mitigate any adverse impacts. 5. ANIMAL LIFE: A, B, and D It has been determined that the Coachella Valley Fringe-Toed Lizard (UMA INORNATA) exists on the property. This lizard has been designed as a threatened species by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and endangered by California Department of Fish and Game. Mitigation Measures: Prior to issuance of building permit, the applicant shall provide mitigation measures in the form of fees of $750 per acre for a Fringe-Toed Lizard (UMA INORNATA) habitat preserve. Any fees collected are to be placed in a fund to be used for acquisition of land for a lizard preserve in the Coachella Valley. 16. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION: a. The proposed 36 condominium units could generate up to ten trips per day. However, the generation factor will probably be less due to the resort, second home, nature of the area. Based on the maximum generation factor, 360 trips per day could be generated. This number of trips can be handled by Country Club Drive. As a mitigation measure, half street improvements will be required on Country Club Drive which will be sufficient to handle the increased traffic. 17. PUBLIC SERVICE (FIRE PROTECTION): a. The property is currently outside the five (5) minute fire department response area as established by the fire department. This could provide unsatisfactory fire and emergency medical response for residents. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall be required to pay fees into fire protection fund as established by city ordinance for fire station site and facility, and fire apparatus and equipment. C. PUBLIC SERVICES (SCHOOLS): The project will have an adverse impact on the provision of school facilities. Mitigation Measures: Applicant shall pay $628 per unit to the Desert Sands Unified School District. 23. LIGHTING AND GLARE: The project would be provided with normal residential lighting in common areas and along streets. Mitigation Measures: None required provided lighting is kept low and down shining. CASE Y0. }��41"',�Q ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DEPT. INITIAL STUDY ENVIROYSIENNTAL EVALUATION CHECKLIST NOTE: The availability of data necessary to address the topics listed below shall form the basis of a decision as to whether the application is considered complete for purposes of environmental assessment. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers , possible mitigation measures and comments are provided on attached sheets) . Yes Maybe No 1 . Earth. Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? b. Disruptions, displacements , compaction, or overcovering of the soil? c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? d. The destruction, covering, or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? V 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? _ _ \V b. The creation of objectionable odors? `1 c. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? _ _ 2, Yes Maybe No 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: a_, Changes. in currents, Aor the course or '- direction of water' movements? _ '` . b. Changes in-absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and-amount of surface water runoff? C. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? d. Alteration of.the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? L e. Change in the quantity of ground waters, / either through direct additions or with- drawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? f. Reduction in the amount of water other- wise available for public water supplies? 4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass , and crops)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or endangered species of plants? _ v c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? 5. Animal. Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds , land animals including reptiles , or Insects)? b: Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or endangered species of animals? c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? �l d. Deterioration to existing wildlife *habitat? �' ' 3. Yes tAX! e No 6. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in :.the rate of use of any natural resources? b. Depletion of,any non-renewable natural resource? 7. Energv. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? _ V b. Demand upon existing sources of energy, or re- quire the.development of new sources of ` energy? V S. Risk of Upset; Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of ' hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, pesticides , oil , chemicals, or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? 9. Economic Loss. Will the proposal result in: a. A change in -the value of property and improvements endangered by flooding? b. A change in the value of property and improvements exposed to geologic hazards — beyond accepted community risk standards? 10. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels to the point at which accepted community noise and vibration levels are exceeded? 11. Land Use. Will the proposal result in the a t—i eration of the present developed or • planned land use of an area? _ 12. Open Space. Will the proposal lead to a decrease in the +amount of designated open space? 13. Population. Will the proposal result in: a. Alteraticn oi• the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of the City? b. Change in the population distribution by aye, income, 'religion, racial , or ethnic \ 4 group, occupational class, household type? _ _ y 4. ° Yes Maybe No 14. Emoloyment. Will the proposal result in additions new long-term gobs provided, or a change in the number and per cent employed, unemployed, and underemployed? �f 15. Housing Will the proposal result in: a. Change in number and per cent of housing units by type (price or rent range, zoning category, owner-occupied end rental , etc. ) relative to demand or to number of families in various income classes in the City? b. Impacts on existing housing or creation of a �. demand for additional housing? 11, Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal / result in: - a. Generation of additional vehicular movement? b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or r demand for new parking? c. Impact upon existing transportation systems? _ d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation — or movement of people and/or goods? e. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, \ . bicyclists, or pedestrians? _ 17. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for, new or altered governmental services in any of the following areAs: \ a. Fire protection? b. Police protection? c. Schools? v d. Parks or other recreational facilities? V e. Maintenance of public facilities , including roads? f. Other governmental services? _ _ ;r 5. Yes Maybe No 18. Public fiscal Balance. Will the proposal result in a net change in government fiscal flow (revenues less operating expenditures and annualized capital expenditures)? .19. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: r a. Power or natural gas? _ b. Communications system? c. Water? % d. Sewer or septic tanks? e. Storm water drainage? f. Solid waste and disposal? _ 20. Human Health. Will the proposal result in: a. The creation of any health hazard or ' potential health hazard? b. A change in the level of community health ' care provided? 21. Social Services. Will the proposal result in — an increased demand for provision of general social .services? 22. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in: a. Obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public? b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? - c. Lessening of the overall neighborhood (or area) attractiveness, pleasantness, \ and uniqueness? b 23. Li ht and Glara. Will the proposal produce new ig t or g are? 24. Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal .result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object, or building? V 6. Yes Maybe No 25. Mandatory Findings of Significance. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment or to curtail the diversity in the environment? b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into J the future. ) c. Does the project have impacts which are indi- vidually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small , but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant. ) d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings , either directly or indirectly? Initial Study Prepared By: ��� S ' ll .4- IA- VA, . + in IBIS � O 4R - � O `a ; 1 i = ' r o; i1 " Desert Sands V ri1I1C� SC�00� D18tTIC��I tart "r,•yr < ` BERMUDA DUNES B7 Crri ('([/ B2 B WGNWAV 111+ • INDIO-.CALIFORNIA 02201 EB78 (BIBI 317 BB31'trl 1'njYj kl}hn , ( 4jy,r'• S Y } RANCHO MIRAGE I : 1 , v .; I r rf} F Y ' , ' V INDIAN WELLS +a , ri` r t- r Y i i k Y A • -; PALM DESEPi �E�I rt(tt ri l; J+ +l Y 'November ..-.21 , 1984 1 , 1• ' '"�O INDIO I'>l�"I+�t t y..l. } + •, , I „ , A ' il { t t l : .Cl1•t'Ory1t161 ^ , /i rl 1' �� Ramon. Diaz t is fi L. 6P p9LM b�S� Eb \ 73-510 Fred Waring Drive " Palm Desert CA 92260 r r , Ilr RE Comments oni'Parcel ',Plan 84.-48 and Parcel Plan 84 49, w . .Tentative: Tract 20434J.L fx t a Dear Mr ;Diaz Please require .mitigat,ion .agreement to be s11gned by Desert Sands 4 Unlfied :School District and;developer.`' .They can-come., our ; ' IY z` q. office to pick up ',a copy'-of-'the agreement form." Conditional . approval r', is' okay.; ' Project`wiII lmpact. DesertSands,Unifled School District Fess will mitigate Slncere.lY. } i n ..11t(' Itff rFr {1F�`14 f Yiri.4 Richard M Beck - r Facilities Planner z d RMB/Par . 1 r t .f .. . li r+ ( ? 4 i.(<sf t } tt ' a r +. Y py L! Y f , Y 11.1 -✓1' it) '+ r r . )i 4 11S JI (:xt , r . lo f , FmI r sr Y :, h .� K . + I -,.I;� + . { ii, r I I en i i - IiJ Orr•{ir s' It�it;.,sl " .i.: �,: t Y- I r (L: 1 )•l t i -r+ }{�U�. lEi rkj x)ryyr".,i i f ' ., i'}. If` � �r✓`�{ r ,IJ .` nF ti -( '- Sr: f� I - r ('i.• � f '1, -' y is • N, Ali ' it Y1 �1 �.1 y�w, �'1ar71 Zrl�li I ,f4�ef Y —Lit'Si .l a Y I it d I , rl \ p,I d. Is 'tk li¢ : rii al 1 r:' r 41 t , 1 h r f r + , ` ';rt ;! + .li' Itr Y\1'r. „ ir:4y%•Yi) l.(1 Fj���� Ll� � . F p is �, FF I � t y r rr( t i 445-M PRICXLY PEAR LANE. PALM DESERT, CAU FORMA 92200 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 XPARaM?T OF BUILDING & SAFETY PRELUM* Y REVM4 OF FLANS IffiS IS Wr A FLAN a=l IEV17M=: rip aix�xLss: BEPVRE ANY sx= oariErriS CAN BE MADE, ALmTTILRIP.L INFUFAIATIGN TS tiFalm FCR RF'VI l.. . CG,f= ARCI MCZJRAL DRAWINGS AND SFECIFTCATIO.NS CZPIPI.ETE SnULT ksAL DRAWIDIGS AND CALCU TICUS COMP= H.V.A;C. , FZF.=CAL AND FUMING nANS & SPM-MCA2ZL1:9S ME= T= 24 a>ERGY COHSEAVATION LOCUMTTAZ' 4 CI (METE GRADING FLANS OIHF�t CITY OF r', . ;.i DATE DIRECTOR OF BUILDING 6 SAFETY r 4 .'11 ii:� '4t "t .zr ' - "I �Y'°�� +.C'._ V ' t .� I i• - "r., , i � C!- t t,v`<\V'�.,Glt� ,� / � .{�+ � It >n" ,C1 �� ai^'.`.✓� ��m�l'a's l�-:f-..-rk`�Y`r '�I ,t (k r -rr r --..2s la f�a aL`F /,f 7� 1 a� � ..Yo: • L , rst.rs '. 1't :�Ilr s 1f.jf t �i oT� "c.�'�-� ,:i ♦r�i'1C'•' � �: _ f t� + !, a jra Z_-�♦. �'^" ,7]''3j�11 bf E r -. r4i ' Y Can I' }4� { t14 % s i t - �� Ti "7"' `. -..♦ A '` s. f S} r v K- 1 .I 7a., $, a t _. I jt } : v f 'f i-sl Y t t CiF EEL 191 NVif:ON1.ICNTAI SERVICES CITY OF PALM DESERT CLT� IT It CITY OF ! iru PALM DESERT (: S '-„I,y_ r, " III {• DEPARTMENT n ...__' sf !� - 0 OF! f, t \�Vf_ L> —' ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES r- \Mm1' GCf1181T OflyJllri�e '. ,1y CASE ' S �r4 s NO3_CY1)' , t ar r - 1 f, ♦ t j t.v i / �\ '.t 1 y.t f ,i'4 1?!?' a�f .}'t, `� u t ♦4 `.' i7''If u.• lr y y. ..0 �1 tiy.. :.L. . I " ,S Zr'e i7 r..'t -...: 'ti .,. I �..f•....$ "e♦1 ._....et. ]I.-. �.t A .e 1 E r t i f 1 + ' '• j( \`p ` SJ:4, is'Olt) �'.Y. ' �"W 0 ? I I 1 { `w l r tt t , t l 1 1 { f �V k I t r 1 < t` �) \ 3AI a{� - !, f• 1 t , � i I ��tY• [I d# .,� , ' i ' I + 4f - \F-0aCj7 -.I v f rn IY w'.• ! Y,I L t.t I'. '} a..j1 6; t1 . is <!d .d l kY { 'Ai' r {.. )' 'l,.1w•'k :yr: �i ' , ' '1 l f. Il Y 1 ♦ 1 Y 1 1 y . J� r 1 '' Y ��• p�; � - �� �--.3.U�{i:•.a',���'Fr ICI . . t�. J. . r t E J 7 1-I l 6.i F fy� � 17 Fla t I. .i 1 =� CITY OF z U 1979 I -�4�mrf" '• UI \� PAUA DESERT - ` D'cPAO MINT ' V L ENVIRONMENTAL rtrr CP muil rzs:.RT SERVICES tXIIJBIT CASE ,. rto .---�3.lYh ; .,r� S ,r t+�.� t.. 1 ItY} l 71 N f tJt .f"•, _;� / l �>..,Il t{ t�, I`' t .71t { `t )�F• {. ! 6 , i-i _, .{� ) ( v .''� r'b JL,M1S :� �. " ncYTj(ACtwCll�. s,,�_ff , fylrl •>St�{)J4, � ,mot 5��3L� .'ic.~G.`•:fil�'.Y L� .i:�v`.irf a�y�w `) .s.Yli..t..< i. _ -a�..:l ..twC p�'Jt:�h�). .i�.�t•.� i v fi!'•L .�j t � .,.. IS )i ).( u a<L Y S� ],•r. -i ;7t•! 1 I aa/ �.ei .� P• t ei r t tTt `- I///. s , ' ; —.-�.�.vr--- �.fF tlx , - j m -- � ;1Q 1 ' I t ,y !� CQ-S':1"La A' �_ _—. t' �: 9 1 -rri•s 1 !`(7� � •-- _ _ '99 _ x . L, 4' `7 Imp y. ..� F _J . ?M•a. Lry X;t 11 , r-a` ,t } � t ' Z �_ sZ ��ktJ •\2` f,' 'I ` f�': 9 J � 3 -t Flu r L] CITY OF pA!f17 DESERT , ;] % E I V10, EdtTMENT rl OF 197 SEP 1 ENVIZ""(MENTAL 4 sczv,ces a ,. C;(NIDlr ENVIRONMENTAL SC?,V;CCS ,I t , `'', c�- NO. _..:..F""''':'� ` CITY OF PALM c i CAS �Q — — — . 1i13S30 Yd AOk,JIAN3 M i onv G :li% a J _ - I � E Rr O R--lrl-_ TAL ICESPA E SERV IJIBIT I1C NSE , 1 r I` K"'P �{i.s lv�r "�f� FiT.N`A� F !'(i i� tif+rlr�..Le . .. a•, ' ♦ d el �: .�1 L I , un OLi o 15 � Str � ;• � 71 e tr�ier l L_ i L �i o♦ Sri I z - 41 I�JJT`�` �( JA140 f0)J iApt/Y)G] �y • �o U0c�� U ))F PALK OfFSEc ma.� 4� 275 (PrOckOF Pear Lane, Mon Desert, C.92260 SUBDIVISION MAA APPLOC:Q4O N G`'ORN: dap er{t➢ ant ®ff aerv0ce a p gannw ng dMae®w a , R E B. P40 oE¢T/ES �NC. Applicant (please print) _ P. D,Box 65/ �503 ) 659- 8800 Mailing Address Telephone GL,4CKAA4A.5 . O,4EGON 970/S city State Zip-Gods REOUESTt (Describe specific nature of approval requested). _7.2 t Acres ON SodT!/S/O of COUVTQY CGUB �,Q/✓E '572'f z5 5T aF n / ,/ /l�Or/TEQEY //4/✓E, IJEVELOPE 36 Z&17- �GQNNfIJ U.V1T ��EYELOP M N To 6E KNOWN 6T 3 r AS Tq /(/p ?04 ¢ , ��¢!02 APPG/G4T/oN 4/<!S B6E,Y -44~k1zrc f/NOFQ T n/T. TL4GT Alo. /¢805 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Po,¢T/O/.l OF 12EY4 o� IVVV �4 of �SEGTLON 8 T55 R6 E $ B 23 fH � v o ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 6 2 2 "' O 2 0 - 002 EXISTING ZONING PS-5 Property Owner Authorization The undersigned $totes that they are the owner(s) of the property described herein and hereby give author. Italian for the fill g of this application. ro/640 --- oa+ra---- Date Agreement absolving the City of Palm Desert of all Ilabllities relative to arty dsed restrictions. I DO BY MY SIGNATURE ON THIS AGREEMENT, Absolve the City of Palm Dessrt of all liabilities regarding any.deed restrlctions that may be applicable to the propsrty described herein. Signature Date Applicants Signature �•frl� ��. r�JL/� Signature Date (FOR STAFF USE ONLY) Environmental Status Accepted by: Ie5' ❑ Ministerial Act E.A. No. ❑ Categorical Exemption ❑ Ez Negative Declaration CORE-. MO af-r ��tt ❑ Other Reference Cote No. P E I 1 5 E D TE1\1 TA TI VE All P \Y2` 8 ' 24 //' // ` 24 ' d' /Z' 20 • ;I — �� /� j 1 J � V � S' � 6 CASEMENT -- _ - � � - I � cov�t/rR cL oA•/VE _ - _ _ _ �E� .M�,4N��R/�G S�oEtti ASK r Q RMERL Y rRACT NO, 14805 v _X157-A%4e / ON O F T�/E y '' ;FUTU�� BE/1V6 4 SUBD/v/S/ON OF Q �o� T e CU,v,_5- �C7io�/ TYP �'.9 L SEC r-/o N �t/ fit! OF SECT/ON 8 , T. 5 S. , �P 6 E. , S. B. B. E /y. W rpe011,6r_r //1 CD[ /TRY CLUB V4�5* L.OCA T7oN No S c<t GE ,4U49L/S7T 1964 .SCALE. /'-40 $ U RE V/SED JANUARY /985 KWL ASSOCIATES, ENGINEERS 712 Eugene Road PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA 92264 / (619) 327-7786 4.C/A.5, rYPi CA Z_ SEcrioN ,OR/ V A TE S 7R& E 7-- /v° •SCA LZ GENERAL NOTES !. O WNER R. & B. PRO Pc.eTr ES , Inrc . P. 0, E> Ox co5l CLACKAMAS, DeEGoN 970/5 ( sa3) 656 -8800) 2•APPROX. AREA ' 7. /9 ACRES 3. PR 8SEIVT ZONING. R-5 4• A PA (ZCEL ND: E22-020- 002 5, WArEn_ SUPFILY. COACt4ELA VALLEY WATER 2:7I5rRICT 6- SF_YVAGE 0/5POSA(-t a !r If It T. ELECT-RIC POVVE2: SOUTHERN CRU(-ORNIA E0/5oN CO. i 13. GA5 5-UPPLY: SOUrf-lE/ZN CAI /FORN//-} GAS CO_ 9, TELEPHONE ,5ERY/CE: GENERAL TE_5PAo.Ne Co. I I --_PROPOSED TOWIVHOMES i 40" a i /V 0° /4 ' 29" E �aNrzaivcE Zp� / h PROP.01 WAT&CA-1A/N(TVP.) I 40' 40' 4p qo - --- --- - --- ------ _ - _ _ FF. 21$•10 "1, o.s—°�a PeoP SEwe¢M.�/n!�rYP- o•ts% - h1' w o,50� v� --�So Q �, P D Z17.27 `h \ -S 5 5 - - u I J; !j 211.(.0 Zrb. �,\ PAO 21(,.i? 511 S II\\ I FF F.F. 2/b.5v^ vr N �3 `� 232 I� iT 2i3.L O a30_ L12, /7 v 2 c 'L 22 3 1.c . /B'a c P T�z� �I f �� /5 �o} N i 9 0 / lro,l 20' O tc 30 PAD 214.15 F F. 2 W PAD 215.if 1A , I ,h �j vh�✓ s� FF 2/ if .41 v) N > v- v� > `� 20' PAD Z 1 59 N 0 � 20' tl. - - ---- a w 2i 2 20 2 30' o % I 3 24 40 40'— 5 — ---$ — --� _� 4 3 Ij_ 12 , r �2s —L N N V� i �O Z�' N 4 61 o DEc earjly t - c�c / 65 l P d L I Vf 20' �/4 �( _ �a 1— �5 /3 �S R TENTI N 5/ P o 2�3.52 v, \i A0, 2O ,^ RF 24.0 I o F.FZ/3.SS 3 J 4 s� 5 a N� i IN LPG 216 PAD .U) PAD 2/S,5'l I I etc- 27 V`` 32 2�2.0� I 95 - � v � �� � � � FF Z/8.53 -- � Zo" � S•84 � .F 21 4 ! G I ! ro5 G � j � p PAD 2/7- PAO Z(G.C.o PAD i g.gp I I -P, 36 2 F.F. Z/7.83 F.F, ZlCo.93 r.A 215.!30 2r3.�rw. I T ^JN 15 COURT I I ?S tti t; m ZD9.�B.W 2�3. ✓. t ( 212 40 40' 40 40' 40' 40 O tZ 9. 3 i t w---- =� a e c v W I � r occoQArlvE as, 21 - -� -- _ ro5 Q, iZ � ���m� �. �asol •�z.. 5 5 r� /Ic iR/o-Rao /V D ' /5' 28 U I �6Z n, /26 6. 67' I ' Z` N InBAS/N OVEPFCOW CHANNEL ti I � v -4,4)r� FOUNDATION FOR THE RETARDED OF rHE DESERT v N f N - --- - ---- ----------_---- - � -- . T� ' M DESERT E _. Ss P x , 1013 0� nl D. _ •. r.a.. ,i 4 FORM �Zl_ I I!� S T¢ 7,eA0 A/o. 11791 BY - y--� u cote f �P7 U r WITHIN ONE r �:� OF Tx, , . I 1 / / C TE1\1 TA TI VE All P 71 F ORMERL Y r RA C r /VO. 14805 �)C/ST AG�9B NFL✓ ff//VcF 4 SUBD/V/S/O/ti/ OX- •4 A00,Qr/ 01V OF THE cows ACT_1o/v ?"Y�'/cAL s�C7-/oN IV W � OF SECT/O1V 8 T. 5 S. , R. 6 E. , S. B. B. E 1W. o � � � CouNr,4Y cLVB naiyE � Pzal Cr NO S CA LE W L OCA r1om .1 UGUST /984 SC.4ZZ: k KWL ASSOCIATES, ENGINEERS YA rz/Es VA/z/Es PALM SPRINGS, CALFORNIA 92264 15 r0 ---- --- -- /,p- --— (714) 327.7786 IC//V/TY tifA R 0 1, 7 ' aoi� Z 6„PC., C,�G. rYR CA Z_ se-Cr/ON ,oQ V•g rE s raE f r- r R g ::: GE A . _ , �. rat•-=�,s�s.'d«�;-.:i,.xev .. .: :".: `� ;;=',s..: .,�" ,a,. z, I� a , d. r" , i „ s d-r -. .,. :.,- . .. .. - -. ;.,;.._ _ .- -••__ - _ __. --.. _ :' .. ..:.a- ... r' ..._max _ -,'r"` ''�<a za •!:, - _ Rk 41 b a. P 0. �3 ox co 5/ CLACKAMAS 0,eEGOA1 97015 t } ( 503) Cr59 -8800) 2-APPROX. AREA ' 7./9 A CAE 5 3. PRESENT ZONING: R-5 4. ASSESSOk',5 PA2CEL NO. 622-020- oD2 5, WATE2 SUPPLY. COACHE.U-A VALLEY WATER DI5rR/cT Cp. SF_ WAGE D/5POSAC.t 11 11 If /r I T. oOVVE2: 50uTHERN CAUr-o2N1A ED/Sonl co . i 9. CA SCJPF.y SOUrNE2N CA4_/F02N/q GAS Co, 9. TELEPHONE SERVICE: GENEKAL T E.L.LP Hue Co. I I PROPOSED roWNHOMES j QD 40 -fry o j ZZ N 0� 1PA O 217.90 / 4(15 - - F.F. Z18.2 FF. 217 73 65' 440 (� c u Sol. o.sp nw:v iOAp0 �7r r _ _ d• 4�7 � _-- co ,?T / - ti,�� 24 a ,•� W • pA0 io r l 12 i4, / o , e ,� �;�; 2 z T.c F• z,3.�e14 Q < o �� - oti� F � (�l f O T Q� n. �� �� r i l �� 27 Q I - - - ---1 -- - ---- 57' 4 w — - - - / �h '• 1 C s / `' OLIJ *� �/�'r'� �O , PAD /2-°J7 13 0 j - c- - --- --- - — I / / 2/3.27 -- - - - - � W 5 5 � 1 / ,!' S � r � 65 v � 15 � N a` � B 'L�---_-- - I -� ti`�'•� j� �' � �I ',I 4 2i`' K P• •1• ti ® _ _ � , 6•s � �1 i 43 izvv 2 O ` ii •c Pb�O ti'� 2 2? b V . - Z O ;� 5 O � F.F. Z/5.73 � - . • t �It" i a FP` 213-` .�.� � �5• /�, �, '`0 0 ( I _% g ti� t �?fTf�vT/O /�V p L (� N32oq- h I b 44� c. �? /7./.o AID 2i5.90 _ \ v t. % 1' VA Z/B.2o P�1p T 65 j V h %�� 1 o _ 3 F.F_ 2/B 30 FF. �L/7.93 FAF ZrG. / ��� j Q till / 11\ �L --�` \/ \\�ti/0 y l / N 2i IG' 4 11 \ 1 $ tQ a` t L 2y 3 40 ' 4O' 0' o - ¢6 SS I W Pao i✓Qfc- /1�loi�j TrP_�� ✓ t W o.zs�. 11 O.Ts j -- - - 48 o T S S S + - J mop. Sewer Ala/r7 yo. � o a45rN OVER-FLOW CK4N NIV EB. IV O`/S ,28"E- � � � / u /266 B7 T c e �:-= • I / 4 ��'� 'm FOUNDATION FOR THE RETARDED OF THE DESERT a Iti I o N z p i Zo . � T.QA C T IVO• // 79/ { MONTceey i I