Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTT 24254 HOVLEY LANE WEST SONATA II FILE 2 1996 TRANSMITTED FROM: El7245 Joshua Lane, Suite B P4 73-185 Highway 111, Suite A Warner Yucca Valley, California 92284 Palm Desert, California 92260 _Phone (760)365-7638 Phone (760)341-3101 engineering Fax (760)365-2146 Fax (760)341-5999 I CIVIL ENGINEERING/RI NNING I LAND SVRVEVING LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL TO: (I '}, , � �L1c�i �{ DATE: b(3 N7 n�� .e,fi P/R�OJECTNO.: 0Szq& 07P ��,"A l(L't,V1D RE: 59 YI.a l!N{�L &---) ATTENTION: (� We are sending you: ® Attached Via Messenger ❑ Other ❑ Originals Prints Copy of Letter Other COPIES DATE PAGES DESCRIPTION These are.transmitted as checked below: For your use As requested' For Approval For review&comment ❑Other REMARKS: WARNER ENGINEERING Copy To: By: �,/' •��� /L�.j' PLANING CST4ISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1332 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING Ca�MISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A 94 LOT SINGLE FAMILY SUBDIVISION LOCATED NORTH OF HOVLEY LANE, 1900 FEEL' WEST OF PORTOLA AVENUE. CASE NO: TT 24254 WHEREAS, the Planning Oamni.ssion of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 7th day of February, 1989, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider the request by BAROON DEVELOPMENT for the above mentioned project. WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedures to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 80-89", in that the director of environmental services has determined that the project has been previously assessed. WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said planning conuLission did find the following facts and reasons to exist to justify approval of the tentative tract map: (a) That the proposed map is consistent with applicable general and i specific plans. (b) That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. (c) That the site is physically suitable for the type of development. (d) That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development. (e) That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. (£) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems. (g) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IF RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the commission in this case; 2. That it does hereby approve the above described Tentative Tract Map No. 24254, subject to fulfillment of the attached conditions. I PLANNING CMI 1 SSION RESOLUTION NO. 1332 PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 7th day of February, 1989 by the following vote, to wit: AYES: DOWNS, LADLOW, WHITLOCK, ERWOOD NOES: NONE ABSENT: RICHARDS ABSTAIN: NONE RICHARD ERWOOD, Chairman ATTEST: R \4 ' RAMON A. DIAZ, Secrelfaey /fr l 2 PLANK= O�DMSSION RESOLUTION NO. 1332 I iCONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO. TT 24254 Department of CommiuLity Development: 1. The final map shall conform substantially with the tentative tract map as modified by the following conditions. 2. Applicant shall obtain clearance from the following agencies prior to construction: Public Works Department Palm Desert Architectural CorLission City Fire Marshal Coachella Valley Water District Building and Safety Department Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be Presented to the departrnent of building and safety at the time of issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. 3. The applicant shall pay all applicable fees in accordance with city policy including those for lizard and art in public places. 4. Front setbacks - 20' to main garage door, straight driveway; or 15' otherwise, rear setbacks - 15' , side setbacks - 5' single story, 12' for two story; building height 15' maximum one story, 24' two story. 5. Twenty feet of landscaped area along Portola and Hovley for an 8' wide meandering sidewalk. 6. Property decorative walls required at minimum 6' , and maximum 8' if used in conjunction with retaining walls. 7. Perimeter decorative walls required at minimum 6', and maximum 8' if used in conjunction with retaining walls. 8. Prospective home buyers awareness package shall be signed by all prospective homeowners of tract prior to entering escrow approved by director of community development with copies sent to community development department after signature of prospective home buyers has been obtained. 9. All hones on perimeter lots shall be limited to 15 feet except where adjacent to San Tropez Apartments.l 10. Block walls (decorative along street frontages) required to be 6' for perimeter of project and along interior property lines, except along the j east boundary of the tract; wall shall be located on property line, 3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUrICN NO. 1332 minimum 5' in height and 4' in height above adjacent Casablanca pad elevations. Department of Public Works: 1. Drainage fees, in accordance with Section 26.49 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code and Palm Desert Ordinance No. 507, shall be paid prior to recordation of final map. 2. Drainage facilities, as designated within the Northside Area Drainage Master Plan shall be provided to the specifications of the Director of Public Works. 3. Storm drain construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study prepared by a civil engineer that is reviewed and approved by the department of public works. 4. Signalization fees, in accordance with City of Palm Desert Resolution No's. 79-17 and 79-55, shall be paid prior to recordation of final map. 5. Full public improvements, as required by Sections 26.44 and 26.40 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code, shall be installed in accordance with applicable city standards. 6. As required under Palm Desert Municipal Code Section 26.28, and in accordance with Sections 26.40 and 26.44, complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted to the director of public works for checking and approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. Off-site improvement plans to be approved by public works department and a surety posted to guarantee the installation of required off-site improvements prior to recordation of the final map. Such off-site improvements shall include, but not be limited to, curb and gutter, asphalt paving and concrete sidewalk in an appropriate size and configuration. "As-built" plans shall be submitted to, and approved by, the director of public works prior to the acceptance of the improvements by the city. 7. Improvement plans for water and sewer systems shall be approved by the respective service districts with "as-built" plans submitted to the department of public works prior to the project final. 8. Applicant shall cause to have established a landscaping district under the 1972 Landscaping and Lighting Act for the maintenance along Hovley Lane. 9. As required under Section 12.16 and 26.44 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code, all existing utilities shall be undergrounded per each respective utility district's recommendation. If determined to be unfeasible, applicant shall agree to participate in any future utility undergrounding district. 4 PLANNING Ca4wUSSION RESOLUTION NO. 1332 10. In accordance with Palm Desert Municipal Code Section 26.44, complete grading plans and specifications shall be submitted to the director of Public works for checking and approval prior to issuance of any permits. 11. As required by Section 26.32 and 26.40 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code, and in accordance with the Circulation Network of the City's General Plan, dedication of half-street right-of-way at 44 feet on Hovley Lane shall be provided prior to recordation of the final map. 12. Traffic safety striping on Hovley Lane shall be provided to the specifications of the director of public works. A traffic control plan must be submitted to and approved by the director of public works before placing pavement markings. 13. Full improvement of interior streets based on 60' residential street and 50' on cul-de-sac street standards as established in accordance with Chapter 26, Section 26.40.040, C.P.D. Code. 14. Traffic analysis to be prepared for the project to address the specific impacts on existing networks street and intersections and the proposed mitigation measures reco fended for approval by the City. 15. Ccmplete tract map shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the l director of public works for checking and approval and be recorded before issuance of any permits. 16. Any and all off-site improvements shall be preceded by the approval of plans and the issuance of valid encroachment permit(s) by the department of public works. 17. A completed preliminary, soils investigation, conducted by a registered soils engineer, shall be submitted to and approved by the department of public works prior to.issuance of the grading permit. 18. Pad elevations and drainage schemes as shoran on the preliminary grading and drainage plan are subject to review and modification in accordance with Section 27 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code. 19. Waiver of access to Hovley Lane except at approved locations shall be granted on the final map. 20. The rear property line of proposed lots 45 through 51 shall be moved easterly to coincide with the existing property line. 21. Drainage easements as maybe necessary for storm drain construction shall be provided on the final map. 22. Storm drain and Hovley Lane street improvements shall be based on City of Palm Desert project 509-87 (Drawing No. 1128. I 5 PLAT' II Oa-ZUSSICN RFSOLVPION NO. 1332 City Fire Marshal : l 1. The Fire Department is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commercial buildings per Uniform Fire Code Section 10.301C. 2. Provide, or show there exists a water system capable of providing a potential fire flow of 1500 gpn and the actual fire flaw available from any one hydrant connected to any given water main shall be 1500 gpn for 2 hours duration at 20 psi residual operating pressure. 3. A fire flaw of 1500 gpn for a 2 hour duration at 20 psi residual operating pressure must be available before any combustible material is placed on the job site. 4. The required fire flaw shall be available from a Super hydrant(s) (6" x 4" x 2 1/2" x 2 1/2"), located not less than 25' nor more than 200' from any portion of the building(s) as measured along approved vehicular travelways. Hydrants installed below 3000' elevation shall be of the "wet barrel" type . 5. Prior to the application for a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and two copies of the water system plan to the County Fire Department for review. No building permit shall be issued until the water system plan has been. approved by the County Fire Chief. Upon approval, the original will be returned. One copy will be sent to the responsible inspecting authority. Plans shall conform to fire hydrant types, location and spacing, and the system shall meet the fire flow requirements. Plans shall be signed by a Registered Civil Engineer and may be signed by the local water company with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Riverside County Fire Department. 6. Whenever access into private property is controlled through use of gates, barriers, guard houses or similar means, provision shall be made to facilitate access by emergency vehicles in a manner approved by the Fire Department. All controlled access devices that are power operated shall have a radio-controlled over-ride system capable of opening the gate when activated by a special transmitter located in emergency vehicles. Devices shall be equipped with backup power facilities to operate in the event of power failure. All controlled access devices that are not power operated shall also be approved by the Fire Department. Minimum opening width shall be 12", with a minimum vertical clearance of 13"6' . /fr I 6 CITY PLAZA BUILDING 33282 GOLDEN LANTERN STREET SUITE 201 R.J. CUNNINGHAM DANA POINT,CA. 92629 COMPANY (714) 661-3998 FAX (714) 661-2269 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS • TRANSMITTAL Gp� aj�a • DATE 4/22/97 • PROJECT SONATA-TRACT 24254 RECEIVE® • TO CITY OF PALM DESERT APR 2 41997 • 73510 FRED WARING DRIVE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF PALM DESERT • PALM DESERT,CA 92262 • ATTENTION - SIEVE SMITH • ENCLOSED THREE SETS PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR SUBMITTAL AND REVIEW • REMARKS • FROM ROBERT CUNNINGHAM CC DENNIS CUNNINGHAM-CENTURY CROWELL COMMUNITIES CITY PLAZA BUILDING 33282 GOLDEN LANTERN STREET SUITE 201 n DANA POINT, CA. 92629m (714) 661-3998 FAX (714) 661-2269 o TRANSMITTAL • DATE 5/28/97 • PROJECT TRACT 24254 SONATA TO CITY OF PALM DESERT • 73510 FRED WARING DRIVE • PALM DESERT,CA 9=62 MAY 2 v1997 • attn..STEVESN= OOMMUNITyDEVELOP - ClTyOFPALM DESERTAATMENT • ENCLOSED • PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN 3 copies REMARKS THIS PACKAGE REFLECTS THE CORRECT FOOT PRINTS FOR YOUR REVIEW AND APPROVAL FROM ROBERT JOHN CUNNINGHAM JR. Cc DENNIS CUNNINGHAM-CENTURY CROWELL COMMUNITIES 4 City ®f Palm Desert 73.510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260-2578 - TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 FAX(619)341-7098 June 12, 1997 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION ACTION CASE NO.: TT 24254 APPLICANT(AND ADDRESS): CENTURY HOMES for SONATA AT PALM DESERT, 1535 South"D" Street, San Bernardino, CA 92408; R. J. CUNNINGHAM COMPANY. 33282 Golden Lantern Street, Suite 201, Dana Point, CA 92629 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of final working drawings and revised preliminary landscape plan LOCATION: North of Hovley Lane, 1900 feet west of Portola Avenue ZONE: PR-5 Upon reviewing the submitted plans and presentations by staff and by the applicant,the architectural commission approved the final architectural plans as submitted and the landscape plan subject to changes noted by Eric Johnson. Date of Action: June 10, 1997 Vote: Carried 6-0 (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within ten(10)days of the date of the decision. Any amendments to this approved plan would need to be resubmitted to commission for approval.) STAFF COMMENTS: It is your responsibility to submit the plans approved by the architectural commission to the department of building and safety. CONTINUED CASES: In order to be placed on the next meetings agenda, new or revised plans must be submitted no later than 9:00 a.m. the Monday eight days prior to the next meeting. Pape RrE Paper MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION JUNE 10, 1997 5. CASE NO.: TT 24254 1 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): CENTURY HOMES for(SONATA AT PALM MESERT;1535 South"D"Street,San Bernardino,CA 92408;R.J.CUNNINGHAM COMPANY, 33282 Golden Lantern Street, Suite 201,Dana Point, CA 92629 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of final working drawings and revised preliminary landscape plan LOCATION: North of Hovley Lane, 1900 feet west of Portola Avenue ZONE: PR-5 Mr. Smith presented plans noting that Eric Johnson had reviewed the landscape plan and listed his comments. He indicated that the working drawings for the homes are consistent with what was approved in the preliminary stage. Action: It was moved by Commissioner Connor, seconded by Commissioner O'Donnell, to approve the final architectural plans as submitted and the landscape plan subject to changes noted by Eric Johnson. Motion carried 6-0. 6. CASE NO.: PP 96-9 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): McFADDEN&McINTOSH ARCHITECTS for COLD CALL COWBOY PRODUCTIONS, 74-929 Larrea, Suite IA, Palm Desert, CA 92260 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of final working drawings for 14,990 square foot warehouse/office building LOCATION: Southeast comer of Boardwalk and St. Charles Place ZONE: S.I. Mr. Buchanan indicated that the final working drawings were consistent with the approved preliminary plans. 6 City of Palm Desert 73.510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260-2578 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 FAX (619)341-7098 May 15, 1997 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION ACTION CASE NO.: TT 24254 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) CENTURY HOMES for SONATA AT PALM DESERT, 1535 South "D" Street, San Bernardino, CA 92408; R.J. CUNNINGHAM COMPANY, 33282 Golden Lantern Street, Suite 201, Dana Point, CA 92629 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of preliminary landscape plan LOCATION: North of Hovley Lane, 1900 feet west of Portola Avenue ZONE: PR-5 Upon reviewing the submitted plans and presentations by staff and by the applicant,the architectural commission approved the preliminary landscape plan as submitted subject to grouping the trees within species. Date of Action: May 13, 1997 Vote: Carried 6-0 (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within ten(10)days of the date of the decision. Any amendments to this approved plan would need to be resubmitted to commission for approval.) STAFF COMMENTS: It is your responsibility to submit the plans approved by the architectural commission to the department of building and safety. CONTINUED CASES: In order to be placed on the next meetings agenda, new or revised plans must be submitted no later than 9:00 a.m. the Monday eight days prior to the next meeting. Reco7d Paper J MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MAY 13, 1997 cluttered the signage and should be eliminated. The representative for applicant, Mr. Johnson Go, indicated that "JUST JUICE" was part of the new logo for Orange Julius. Commissioner O'Donnell suggested that "JUST JUICE" be placed elsewhere. Commissioner Gregory agreed and felt that the bottom lines take away from the signage and would be very hard to read unless you were right up next to the sign. Commissioner Connor agreed that the signs were too hard to read with the clutter of the bottom line. Mr. Smith noted that the plans indicate that the "Orange Julius" is a registered trademark, but questioned if "just juice" was part of the registered trademark. He added that if the entire sign was considered a registered trademark than the colors would not be an issue and that the sign would have to be reduced in size.. Action It was moved by Commissioner Holden, seconded by Commissioner Urrutia, to approve the color change for the center from teal to orange and approved the signage for Dairy Queen/Orange Julius subject to deleting the bottom line ("An American Original" and"Just Juice"). Motion carried 6-0. B. Preliminary Plans: 1. CASE NO.: [TT.2-41347 APPLICANT(AND ADDRESS): CENTURY HOMES fortSONATA_AT P-ALMI 'qT!1535 South"D"Street,San Bernardino,CA 92408;R.J.CUNNINGHAM COMPANY, 33282 Golden Lantern Street, Suite 201, Dana Point, CA 92629 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of preliminary landscape plan LOCATION: North of Hovley Lane, 1900 feet west of Portola Avenue ZONE: PR-5 Mr. Smith presented the revised preliminary landscape plan noting that Eric Johnson had reviewed the plan and noted his comments/suggestions. Commissioner Connor felt that the plant palette submitted was acceptable. 6 MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MAY 13, 1997 Action: It was moved by Commissioner Connor, seconded by Commissioner Urrutia, to approve the preliminary landscape plan as submitted subject to grouping the trees within species. Motion carried 6-0. 2. CASE NO.: C 97-4 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): JERRY WALKER c/o T W W INVESTMENTS for DEL TACO RESTAURANT,76-968 California Avenue,Palm Desert, CA 92260 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of revised preliminary architectural plans LOCATION: 74-617 Highway 111 CASE NO.: C-1 Mr. Smith presented the revised preliminary plans noting that there were some major changes from the plans submitted to the commission three weeks ago. Mr. Alvarez introduced the architect for the project, Mr. Dan Thombury. Mr. Thombury noted that some of the changes included a metal roof over the expanded area with a brick red color instead of the original bright red and the addition of two tower elements tieing it all together with a colonnade. Commissioner Urrutia noted that the color board submitted showed the brick red metal roof while the colored rendering showed a more subtle color roof treatment. He added that he liked the proposed color changes but needed to see what the actual roof color would look like. Mr. Walker stated that he would rather use the lighter terra cotta color for the metal roof. Commissioner Holden suggested that the roof tower elements be expanded. Commissioner Urrutia agreed and felt that they needed to be wider to make it look more substantial. Action: It was moved by Commissioner Holden, seconded by Commissioner Connor, to approve the revised preliminary architectural plans subject to increasing the depth on the roof tower elements and changing the metal roof color to terra cotta. Motion carried 6-0. 7 t City of ■ alm Desert 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260-2578 TELEPHONE (619)346-0611 FAX(619)341-7098 April 24, 1997 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION ACTION CASE NO.: TT 24254 APPLICANT(AND ADDRESS): CENTURY HOMES for SONATA AT PALM DESERT, 1535 South "D" Street, San Bernardino, CA 92408 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of preliminary architectural plans LOCATION: •North of Hovley Lane, 1900 feet west of Portola Avenue ZONE: PR-5 Upon reviewing the submitted plans and presentations by staff and by the applicant,the architectural commission approved the preliminary architectural plans as submitted. Date of Action: April 22, 1997 Vote: Carried 4-0, Commissioners Gregory and O'Donnell Absent (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within ten(10) days of the date of the decision. Any amendments to this approved plan would need to be resubmitted to commission for approval.) STAFF COMMENTS: It is your responsibility to submit the plans approved by the architectural commission to the department of building and safety. CONTINUED CASES: In order to be placed on the next meetings agenda, new or revised plans must be submitted no later than 9:00 a.m. the Monday eight days prior to the next meeting. PerycbE Paper MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION APRIL 22, 1997 `Concept 2000' and the squiggly neon is a concept they want to incorporate. Commissioner Holden indicated that they need to see the peak shown on all elevations. He added that the exposed neon would have to be integrated into the architecture. Mr. Walker indicated that Del Taco does not refer to the neon as signage but rather as a part of the new Concept 2000. Commissioner Urrutia added that the neon needs to be more than just a plant on and suggested that Mr. Walker look at what was done with the neon on Outback Steakhouse. Mr. Walker asked if the neon could be shortened. Commissioner Holden indicated that they would have to look at the design as the neon needed to look like it is part of the building. He added that the commission discourages shiny material for the awnings as the vinyl tends to cook in the heat and loose its color. Commissioner Urrutia questioned the limited use of the tile as it seemed to be an afterthought. He thought their needed to be more tile or none at all. Commissioner Holden suggested bringing out the entire element of the entrance. Action: It was moved by Commissioner Urrutia, seconded by Commissioner Connor, to continue the request to allow the applicant to revise the plans per recommendations discussed with commission. Motion carried 4-0, Commissioners Gregory and O'Donnell Absent. 4. CASE NO.: T��-24254= APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): CENTURY HOMES fo NA M VES�RTk 1535 South"D" Street, San Bernardino, CA 92408 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of preliminary architectural plans LOCATION: North of Hovley Lane, 1900 feet west of Portola Avenue ZONE: PR-5 Mr. Smith reported that the previous developer sold these lots to Century Homes. The applicant, Mr. Dennis Cunningham, indicated that the homes were basically the same as Belmonte. Commissioner Van Vliet asked if any comments were received from existing homeowners. Mr. Smith replied that the comments were at the planning commission hearing and their concerns were addressed at that time. 7 MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION APRIL 22, 1997 Action: It was moved by Commissioner Van Vliet, seconded by Commissioner Urrutia, to approve the preliminary architectural plans as submitted. Motion carried 4-0, Commissioners Gregory and O'Donnell Absent. 5. CASE NO.: CUP 92-7 APPLICANT(AND ADDRESS): THE LARSON GROUP for SACRED HEART CHURCH, 73-441 Little Bend Trail, Palm Desert, CA 92260 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of preliminary architectural and landscaping plans for new 6,500 square foot pastoral center LOCATION: 43-775 Deep Canyon Drive ZONE: R19,000/PR-4 Mr. Smith presented the plans showing the demolition of the existing 3,000 square foot building and a construction of the new 6,500 square foot pastoral center which meets the setback requirements. The representative for the applicant, Mr. David Prest, presented the colored site plan. Action: It was moved by Commissioner Van Vliet, seconded by Commissioner Holden, to approve the preliminary architectural and landscaping plans as submitted. Motion carried 2-0-2, Commissioners Connor and Urrutia Abstaining with Commissioners Gregory and O'Donnell Absent. C. Miscellaneous: 1. CASE NO.: APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): MR. JAMES JONES for PALM DESERT PALMS APARTMENTS, Post Office Box 8294, Palm Springs, CA 92263 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of Certificate of Zoning Conformance 8 City of Palm Desert 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260-2578 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 FAX (619)341-7098 March 27, 1997 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION ACTION CASE NO.: TT 24254 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): GOLDEN HILLS PROPERTY MANAGEMENT for SONATA II, 6963 Douglas Blvd., Box 19, Granite Bay, CA 95746 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of final working drawings and preliminary and final approval of landscaping plan LOCATION: North of Hovley Lane, 1900 feet west of Portola Avenue ZONE: PR-5 Upon reviewing the submitted plans and presentations by staff and by the applicant,the architectural commission approved the landscaping plan as submitted for the model unit subject to the applicant providing the city with a drought tolerant plan that will be made available to the buyers. Commission approved the architectural final working drawings as submitted. Date of Action: March 25, 1997 Vote: Carried 6-0 (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within ten(10) days of the date of the decision. Any amendments to this approved plan would need to be resubmitted to commission for approval.) -------------------------------------------------------------7----------------------------------------------- STAFF COMMENTS: It is your responsibility to submit the plans approved by the architectural commission to the department of building and safety. CONTINUED CASES: In order to be placed on the next meetings agenda, new or revised plans must be submitted no later than 9:00 a.m. the Monday eight days prior to the next meeting. PaPei ,r MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MARCH 25, 1997 cream colored hardware. Commissioner Gregory felt that the signage above the awning reading Napa's Tapa's would be hidden. Mr. Bedrosian asked if the applicant will want to place the"Fine Foods, Coffee and Wine" signage somewhere else on the building. Mr. Lanning indicated that they did not. Commissioner Urrutia asked if the awning would be a problem with the adjacent stores. He indicated that he was afraid that it would block their signage. Commissioner Urrutia asked how far it would extend out past the stem wall. Mr. Lanning replied about 4 feet. Commissioner Urrutia stated his concerns about the possible impact to the signs to the west. Mr. Lanning felt that the awning did not take away the visibility of the adjacent tenant's's signage until you are walking under the awning itself. Mr. Smith asked what the purpose of the awning was. Mr. Lanning indicated that it was to provide shade for the outdoor dining area. Commissioner O'Donnell stated that he was unable to vote on the issue without seeing an actual drawing showing details. Commissioner Urrutia suggested that the applicant consider only cover two of the three bays with the awning. Action: It was moved by Commissioner Urrutia, seconded by Commissioner Connor, to continue the request directing the applicant to provide detailed drawings showing how the awning would look on the building. Commission also directed the applicant to obtain written approval from the adjacent business owners as they felt the proposed awning could block the view of the neighboring tenant's signage. Motion carried 6-0. 5. CASE NO.: CTT 24254 7 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): GOLDEN -HILLS--PROPERTY--7 g4ANAGEM'ENT for SONATA I_I—_6963 Douglas Blvd.,Box 19, Granite Bay, CA 95746 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of final working drawings and preliminary and final approval of landscaping plan LOCATION: North of Hovley Lane, 1900 feet west of Portola Avenue ZONE: PR-5 Mr. Buchanan presented final working drawings for the model homes. Mr. Smith added that the ,landscaping plan was also before the commission for approval 5 �r MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MARCH 25, 1997 indicating that the commission had seen the plan at their last meeting but it was too difficult to read. Commissioner Connor noted that the commission has required in the past that at least one unit show a drought tolerant landscaping plan. Mr. Smith noted that typically they require that the developer provide and offer a drought tolerant plan. He added that the city requires that the front yards must be landscaped as well as the side yards on the comer lots. Commissioner Gregory asked if all of the landscaping could be designed with drought tolerant planting in mind and minimize the lawn area. This way they are using water wisely. Mr. Smith indicated that the city has only required that the developer design a drought tolerant plan and make it available. Commissioner Gregory felt that the developer should design all the plans with drought tolerance in mind. Commissioner Connor agreed with this approach. The representative for the applicant,Mr. Elliott,explained that they have two typical plans, one with the lawn and one with desert scape. Mr. Smith indicated that Mr. Elliott will be coming back to the commission with plans for the typical units and noted that what the commission was looking at today was an upgraded plan for the models. Action: It was moved by Commissioner Gregory, seconded by Commissioner Connor, to approve the landscaping plan as submitted for the model units subject to the applicant providing the city with typical landscape plans for individual units which include a drought tolerant plan that will be made available to the buyers. Commission approved the architectural final working drawings as submitted. Motion carried 6-0. 6. CASE NO.: 4797 SA APPLICANT(AND ADDRESS): DGI SIGNS, 77-720 Springfield Lane, Suite B, Palm Desert, CA 92211 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of business identification signage LOCATION: 77-720 Springfield Lane, Suite B ZONE: S.I. Mr. Smith reported that the applicant was not present and that they asked that the case be continued. 6 City of Palm Desert 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260-2578 TELEPHONE (619)346-0611 FAX (619)341-7098 February 27, 1 97 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION ACTION CASE NO.: TT 24254 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): ERIC MILLER, ARCHITECT, A.I.A. for SONATA 11, 901 Rio Grande Blvd.,N.W., Suite D-220A,Albuquerque,N.M. 87104;GOLDEN HILLS PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, 6963 Douglas Blvd., Box 19, Granite Bay, CA 95746 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of landscape plans LOCATION: North of Hovley Lane, 1900 feet west of Portola Avenue ZONE: PR-5 Upon reviewing the submitted plans and presentations by staff and by the applicant, the architectural commission continued the request directing the applicant to provide a more detailed plan outlining all the plant material and sizes. Date of Action: February 25, 1997 Vote: Carried 4-0, Commissioners O'Donnell and Urrutia Absent (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within ten(10) days of the date of the decision. Any amendments to this approved plan would need to be resubmitted to commission for approval.) STAFF COMMENTS: It is your responsibility to submit the plans approved by the architectural commission to the department of building and safety. CONTINUED CASES: In order to be placed on the next meetings agenda, new or revised plans must be submitted no later than 9:00 a.m. the Monday eight days prior to the next meeting. flecycb0 PePe MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION FEBRUARY 25, 1997 tract and needs to inform the present homeowners of its plans. He stated that if the city thinks that this is not being done, as in this case,the city took it upon themselves to send the notice in November. Mr. Smith added that the Architectural Review Commission meetings are public meetings,not public hearings, and the agendas are posted 72 hours in advance in the glass cabinet outside the council chamber. 4. CASE NO.: TI=L 425y43 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): ERIC MILLER, ARCHITECT, A.I.A. for 0NATA-11'r 901 Rio Grande Blvd., N.W., Suite D-220A, Albuquerque, N.M. 87104; GOLDEN HILLS PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, 6963 Douglas Blvd.,Box 19, Granite Bay, CA 95746 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of landscape plans LOCATION: North of Hovley Lane, 1900 feet west of Portola Avenue ZONE: PR-5 Mr. Smith presented the proposed landscape plan. Commissioner Connor asked why there were no gates between the side yards. Mr. Smith indicated that this plan was for the model complex and assumed that once the homes are sold that the walls would be installed. Commissioner Connor explained that there needs to be at least two 24" box trees with leaves on each lot. Commissioner Gregory indicated that the plan was very difficult to read and that is seemed to be lacking trees. Commissioner Connor agreed that the plan was very difficult to read. He added that the citrus trees in 2 foot wide spots by the front doors would not work. Commissioner Gregory added that the mexican fan palms are not called out as far as height and it seems that there is an insufficient amount of trees in the front yard. He also noticed that there are bottle trees on the model units that he originally thought were shrubs. Commissioner Gregory then stated that in order for the commission to review the plan they needed to see something that they could look at realistically. Commissioner Holden questioned the access to the lawn through planters in some areas. Action: It was moved by Commissioner Van Vliet, seconded by Commissioner Connor, to continue the request directing the applicant to provide a more detailed plan outlining all the plant material and sizes. Motion carried 4-0, Commissioners O'Donnell and Urrutia Absent. 6 City of Palm Desert 73.510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260-2578 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 FAX(619)341-7098 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NOTICE OF ACTION Date: February 24, 1997 Golden Hills Property Management 6963 Douglas Boulevard Box 19 Granite Bay, California 95746 Re: ✓TT 24254 Amendment #1 The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of February 18, 1997: PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVED TT 24254 AMENDMENT #1 BY ADOPTION OF PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1784. CARRIED 5-0. Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Community Development, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. /l t_ PH LIP ORE L , S RETARY PALM DESER PLANNING COMMISSION PD/tm cc: Coachella Valley Water District Public Works Department Building & Safety Department Fire Marshal RecycKd P.PM PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1784 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONDITIONS IMPOSED ON A 94 LOT SINGLE FAMILY SUBDIVISION LOCATED NORTH OF HOVLEY LANE, 1900 FEET WEST OF PORTOLA AVENUE. CASE NO. TT 24254 AMENDMENT #1 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 18th day of February, 1997, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider the request ..by GOLDEN HILLS PROPERTY MANAGEMENT for the above mentioned project; and WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedure for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 95-105," in that the Director of Community Development has determined that the project has been previously assessed; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said Planning Commission did find the following facts and reasons to exist to justify granting approval of the amendment to the conditions of approval: 1 . The proposed changes to the conditions will result .in only single story dwellings with a maximum height of 18 feet being constructed in the tract. 2. Single story homes are consistent with development in the area. 3. Single story homes are consistent with the Zoning Ordinance and General Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1 . That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the commission in this case. 2. That notwithstanding conditions #4 and #9 of Planning Commission Resolution No. 1332, that homes developed on Lots 27-32 inclusive on map 24254-1 , Lots 1-30 inclusive on map 24254-2, and Lots 1 -32 inclusive on map 24254 shall comply with the provisions of Municipal Code Chapter 25.16.050 (Development standards for lots less than ten thousand square feet. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1784 I PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 18th day of February, 1997, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: BEATY, CAMPBELL, FERNANDEZ, JONATHAN, FERGUSON NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE JAMES O FE GUSON, Chairperson ATTEST: PHIL P DRELL, ecretary CJ Palm Desert PI nning-Commission I 2 CITY OF PALM DESERT DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission DATE: February 18, 1997 CASE NO: TT 24254 Amendment #1 REQUEST: Approval of an amendment to the conditions of approval on Tentative Tract 24254 located on the north side of Hovley Lane, 1900 feet west of Portola Avenue, immediately west of Casablanca. APPLICANT: Golden Hills Property Management 6963 Douglas Boulevard Box 19 Granite Bay, CA 95746 I. BACKGROUND: TT 25254 was originally approved February 7, 1989. The approved map created 94 single family lots. The westerly 26 lots were built out and/or purchased. The easterly 68 lots remain vacant although street improvements have been completed. In 1989 Barcon presented plans for a mix of one and two story dwellings. Accordingly, Resolution No. 1332 was adopted by Planning Commission and it includes condition #4 as follows: 4. Front setbacks - 20' to main garage door, straight driveway; or 15' otherwise, rear setbacks - 15', side setbacks - 5' single story, 12' for two story; building height 15' maximum one story, 24' two story. and condition #9 which reads as follows: 9. All homes on perimeter lots shall be limited to 15 feet except where adjacent to San Tropez Apartments. Subsequent to the Planning Commission action staff, working in concert with Barcon, agreed to limit two story development to certain specific interior lots. This additional stipulation was conveyed to lot purchasers through a Homebuyers Awareness package. II. PRESENT PROPOSAL: The remaining vacant 68 lots in the tract are to be purchased and developed by Golden Hills Property Management. GHPM proposes to build only one story homes, 18 feet maximum height with sizes ranging from 1800 square feet to 2300 square feet to 2700 STAFF REPORT TT 25254 AMENDMENT #1 FEBRUARY 18, 1997 square feet. In each instance the size does not include garage area. Plans for these homes are currently before the Architectural Review Commission. This current proposal, while it is consistent with our normal maximum height limit for single family, single story dwellings does not comply with conditions #4 and #9 of Resolution No. 1332. Ill. ANALYSIS: There are two (2) issues before the Planning Commission. First, the 15 foot height limit for single story dwellings and the setbacks associated with it in condition #4 (i.e. 20 foot front setback to garage door, straight driveway; or 15 feet; otherwise, rear setbacks 15 feet, side yards 5 feet). Second, the 15 foot height limit for perimeter lots except where adjacent to San Tropez Apartments. The 68 lots in question are all in excess of 8,000 square feet and range in size from 8,055 square feet to 8,568 square feet. The R-1 8,000 zone standards provide for front setback of 20 feet, rear 15 feet, sides minimum 5 feet with total of 14 feet, coverage limit of 35% and maximum height of 18 feet. The matter of limiting perimeter units to 15 feet in height was not discussed in the February 7, 1989 staff report but the condition exists. The existing units at Casablanca to the east are low profile single story units. The property to the north is still vacant. Considering that the Casablanca project ranges from 4.6 feet to 8.6 feet above the pad heights of the adjacent lots in Sonata II (lot numbers 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14) we do not feel a need to alter the 18 foot maximum height limit. There will be no two story homes in this row of homes or on any of the remaining 68 lots. ZONING SETBACKS IN CHART FORM Existing Condition #4 Proposed New Setbacks Front Setback 20' to garage door 20' 15' to building Side Setback 5' each side 5' minimum - total of 14' Rear Setback 15' 15' Height Limit 15' 18, 2 STAFF REPORT TT 25254 AMENDMENT #1 FEBRUARY 18, 1997 IV. CONCLUSION: The existing conditions need to remain in place for the existing 26 homes which have been constructed. Staff will recommend that the remaining 68 lots in the Sonata II tract be allowed to develop consistent with the R-1 zone standards for lots less than 10,000 square feet (i.e., Municipal Code Chapter 25.16.050). V. RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. amending Planning Commission Resolution No. 1332 to permit the remaining vacant lots in TT 24254 to develop pursuant to the provisions of Municipal Code Chapter 25.16.050. VI. ATTACHMENTS: A. Draft resolution B. Legal notice C. Comments from city departments and other agencies D. Plans and exhibits Prepared by eve mith Reviewed and Approved by hil rell /tm 3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONDITIONS IMPOSED ON A 94 LOT SINGLE FAMILY SUBDIVISION LOCATED NORTH OF HOVLEY LANE, 1900 FEET WEST OF PORTOLA AVENUE. CASE NO. TT 24254 AMENDMENT #1 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 18th day of February, 1997, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider the request by GOLDEN HILLS PROPERTY MANAGEMENT for the above mentioned project; and WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedure for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 95-105;" in that the Director of Community Development has determined that the project has been previously assessed; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said Planning Commission did find the following facts and reasons to exist to justify granting approval of the amendment to the conditions of approval: 1 . The proposed changes to the conditions will result in only single story dwellings with a maximum height of 18 feet being constructed in the tract. 2. Single story homes are consistent with development in the area. 3. Single story homes are consistent with the Zoning Ordinance and General Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1 . That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the commission in this case. 2. That notwithstanding conditions #4 and #9 of Planning Commission Resolution No. 1332, that homes developed on Lots 27-32 inclusive on map 24254-1 , Lots 1-30 inclusive on map 24254-2, and Lots 1-32 inclusive on map 24254 shall comply with the provisions of Municipal Code Chapter 25.16.050 (Development standards for lots less than ten thousand square feet. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 18th day of February, 1997, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JAMES CATO FERGUSON, Chairperson ATTEST: PHILIP DRELL, Secretary Palm Desert Planning Commission 2 01/30/1997 15:04 916-652-1182 W G KIRKPATRICK PAGE 02 GHP GOLDEN H1LL5 PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 30 JANUARY, 1997 CITY or PALM DRURT PLANNING DEPARTMENT ATTENTION: MR. ST$VE SMITH FAX NO.: 619 -- 341-7098 RE: SONATA n DEVBLOPMENT TO WHOM IT MAY CONCZVX, THIS LETTXJt I8 TO RZgUSST AN AMENDMENT TO CONDITION NO. 4 (CASE NO. TT 24254( OF PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1339. CONDITION NO. H NC DENCE SHALL B18'O, '0" MAXDFUM FOR A TWO-STORY RMUDENCBSI E IN LIGHT OF THE FACT THAT WS ARE ONLY BUILDING ONE-STORY UNITS, WB WISH TO AMEND THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE HEIGHT TO 1610" FOR ONE- STORY REBIDBNCE8. THU WOULD ALLOW US TO VAULT OUR INTERIOR CZMZGS TUICREBY CREATING A MORZ OPEN/SPACIOUS FEELING FOR THE HOME OWNERS. THIS MGHT INCREASE WOULD NOT NEOATIWCLY IMPACT TUB LOOK OF TUB OVERALL SONATA II DEVSLOPMBNT AND WOULD BLEND WITH THE EXISTING SONATA H HOMES, WHICH CUIMZNTI.Y CONSIST OF BOTH ONE AND TWO-STORY UNITS. WIC ARIL CURRENTLY BEFORE THE ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE AND ARE WORKING TOWARD RRWLVING THEIR CONCERNS. THANK 1!!lA YOUR CONSIDERATION OF THE RBQUZWZD HEIGHT AMENDMPrlft" SINCERELY, sM 8 � 6 I YT1 G SIRKRATRICK A�aiii��' r• �`A'!!0 f` ry fin. ,w �..{ �'�zT..• y' KK! by4Y . ' 1•.' 0Y Y M1 PLANNDr1 CYMMSSION RESSOLUPICN NO. 1332 OONIDITIC S OF APPFOVAL CASE NO. TT 24254 Q" Department of 0?!! ni.ty Development- 1. The final map shall conform substantially with the tentative tract map as modified by the following conditions. 2. Applicant shall obtain clearance from the following agencies prior to construction: Public Works Department Palm Desert Architectural Commission City Fire Marshal 'Coachella Valley Water District Building and Safety Department Evidence of said permit or clearance frcan the above agencies shall be presented to the department of building and safety at the time of issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. 3. The applicant shall pay all applicable fees in accordance with city policy including those for lizard and art in public places. 4. Front setbacks 20' to main garage door, straight driveway; or 15' otherwise, rear setbacks - 15' , side setbacks - 5' single story, 12' for two story; building height 15' maximum one story, 24' two story. IC)' <4yeef S("CL 5. Twenty feet of landscaped area along Portola and Hovley for an 8' wide meandering sidewalk. 6. Property decorative walls required at minimum 6' , and maximum 8' if used in conjunction with retaining walls. 7. Perimeter decorative walls required at minimum 61 , and maximum 8' if used in conjunction with retaining walls. 8. Prospective home buyers awareness package shall be signed by all prospective homeowners of tract prior to entering escrow approved by director of community development with copies sent to community development department after signature of prospective home buyers has been obtained. 9. All hones on perimeter lots shall be limited to 15 feet except where adjacent to San Tropez Apartments.l 10. Block walls (decorative along street frontages) required to be 6' for perimeter of project and along interior property lines, except along the east boundary of the tract; wall shall be located on property line, 3 pIT+NNIIdG CCMUSSION RLSOLVPION NO. 1332 minimum 5' in height and 4' in height above adjacent Casablanca pad elevations. Deparbcn_nt of Public Works- 1. Drainage fees, in accordance with Section 26.49 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code and Palm Desert Ordinance No. 507, shall be paid prior to recordation of final map. 2. Drainage facilities, as designated within the Northside Area Drainage Master Plan shall be provided to the specifications of the Director of Public Works. 3. Storm drain construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study prepared by a civil engineer that is reviewed and approved by the department of public works. 4. Signalization fees, in accordance with City of Palm Desert Resolution No's. 79-17 and 79-55, shall be paid prior to recordation of final map. 5. Full public improvements, as required by Sections 26.44 and 26.40 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code, shall be installed in accordance with applicable city standards. 6. As required under Palm Desert Municipal Code Section 26.28, and in accordance with Sections 26.40 and 26.44, complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted to the director of public works for — checking and approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. Off-site improvement plans to be approved by public works department and a surety posted to guarantee the installation of required off-site improvements prior to recordation of the final map. Such off-site improvements shall include, but not be limited to, curb and gutter, asphalt paving and concrete sidewalk in an appropriate size and configuration. "As-built" plans shall be submitted to, and approved by, the director of public works prior to the acceptance of the improvements by the city. 7. Improvement plans for water and sewer systems shall be approved by the respective service districts with "as-built" plans submitted to the department of public works prior to the project final. B. Applicant shall cause to have established a landscaping district under the 1972 Landscaping and Lighting Act for the maintenance along Hovley Lane. 9. As required under Section 12.16 and 26.44 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code, all existing utilities shall be undergrounded per each respective utility district's recommendation. If determined to be unfeasible, applicant shall agree to participate in any future utility undergrounding district. 4 ' MmavlEs I PALM DESERT PLANING C X4-USSICN FEBRUARY 7, 1989 i B. Case No. TP 24254 - BARCON DSUEIM EW, Applicant Request for approval of a 94 single family lone subdivision located on the north side of Hovley Lane, 1900 feet west of Portola Avenue. Mr. Joy outlined the salient points of the staff report. He noted that the applicant had provided elevations for two-story homes and received conceptual approval from the architectural commission. He explained that the two-story homes would be located within the interior of the project and one-story along the perimeter. Staff recommended approval based on the following reasons: 1) zoning is PR rather than R-1 and PR zoning g* allows up to 30' of building height, and these homes would be 24' high; 2) PR zoning is intended to give flexibility to the commission and the commission has power to grant the two-story in the interior of the project; and 3) project calls for consolidation of five parcels and with this type of integrated development, the developer should be allowed to do something extra. He felt that the city was looking for consolidation of lots. He also indicated that another factor to consider was the two-story San Tropez Villas adjacent to this project. Staff recommended approval with modification to Public Works Condition No. 13 to include 50' streets on cul-de-sac lots. Commissioner Ladlow asked for and received clarification regarding the location of the two-story lots and cul-de-sac streets. Chairman Erwood questioned Public Works Condition No. 8 regarding landscaping maintenance for the property outside the wall, noting that Monterey Meadows was required to post a maintenance bond. After discussion, Mr. Folkers determined that further language needed to be added. Mr. Diaz stated that the condition could read that the applicant shall cause to have established a landscaping district under the 1972 Landscaping and Lighting Act for the maintenance along Hovley Lane. The applicant concurred with the amended conditions. Chairman Erwood opened the public testimony and asked the applicant to address the commission. MR. DENIS FREEMAN, '41-625 Eclectic, clarified that they were planning four or five unit types ranging from 1750 to 2500 square feet and the drawing on display was only one representation--there would be altered elevations to provide a mix. He thought that there would also be a mix along the north property line because they would be facing a two-story development, as well as two-story on the MCBail property. 4 MINUTES PAIM DESERT PLANNI G OaMMISSICN FEBRUARY 7, 1989 Mr. Diaz indicated that the McBail property did not have approved plans so staff was recaimending one story along that property line. Mr. Joy stated that the only perimeter location they could have two story would be along the San Tropez property. Mr. Freeman stated that they would also be very sensitive with two-story and one-stony privacy. He indicated they would build the development in a manner to keep people from looking down into someone's back yard. He noted their previous success with their two-story development in La Quinta. He indicated that it was their intention to have an assessment district; single- family no association bond for the first two months and then the 1972 Act. Mr. Diaz informed the developer that with the condition, it meant that the applicant would pay for the establishment of the district and the assessment engineer. Mr. Freeman concurred. Cc missioner Whitlock requested further clarification on the location of the two-story units since it would make up 40% and knowing that the perimeter would have to be single-story. Mr. Freeman indicated that the two-story units would be primarily within the cul-de-sac streets, noting that they might not be able to accarplish 40%, but that was what they were requesting. He stated that most of the two- story units would be back to back. Chairman Erwood asked if anyone present wished to speak in FAvoR of the project. There was no one. Chairman a-wow asked if anyone wished to speak in OPPOSITION to the project. MR. CHUCK FARANELA, representing the Casa Blanca Homeowners Association, stated that he was concerned with grading. He felt grading should be done so that no single-family dwellings could look into their property. Mr. Joy explained that the applicant had submitted grading plans and the pad heights were approximately six feet below the adjacent homes in Casa Blanca and, single family hones would be nine feet above the pad elevations of the Casa Blanca development. Also, in discussions regarding the alley. way, a condition was included that this project would be constructing a wall along the Casa Blanca boundary and about 25' away from the Casa Blanca wall. He stated that a Casa Blanca representative indicated that they might be tearing down their wall in the future and the new wall frrm this development would be the boundary between the two projects. Mr. Joy also informed ccamission 5 M INvrES PALM DESERT PLANNIW3 CfM II SSICN FEBRUARY 7, 1989 1 i that a condition had been added for prospective hone buyers notifying them that two-story hares will be built within the project. MR. DANIEL BARNES, 41-613 Aventine Court .in Casa Blanca, expressed concern about units per acre and asked if it was within the city's projections for that area. Commissioner Downs stated that the proposal was lower than what could be allowed. Mr. Joy stated that the zoning allows five units per acre and this development was requesting 3.96 and Casa Blanca is five units per acre. Mr. Barnes asked about price projections. Mr. Diaz explained that the city cannot require a specific price on any unit, except for affordable housing. Mr. Barnes was concerned about elevations blocking his views to the west, noting a past problem between Monterey Meadows and the Sagebrush complex. He also asked about the widening of the mad. He noted that the road was widened up to the west boundary of Casa Blanca and after that it reverts to two lanes up to Monterey. He asked if there were any consideration to widening the street all the way down. Mr. Diaz explained that this project would be conditioned to widen the road in front of its project, but beyond that to the west would be widened when that property develops. Mr. Barnes felt that going from two lanes to four lanes to two lanes created a dangerous driving situation. Chairman Erwood closed the public testimony. Commissioner Downs stated that he was in favor of the project. Cam issioner Whitlock concurred, moving for approval, subject to the two-story units being in the interior, in addition to ammmendxents to public works conditions 8 and 13 and the assessment district. Commissioner Ladlow expressed concern about starting a precedent within PR-5 zoning, but Mr. Diaz did not feel a precedent would be started. Action: Moved by Commissioner Whitlock, seconded by Commissioner Dawns, adopting the findings as presented by staff. Carried 4-0. 6 i MINUTES PALM DESERT Pi11miw passim FEBRUARY 7, 1989 Moved by Commissioner Whitlock, seconded by Commissioner Downs, adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 1332, approving TT 24254, subject to conditions as amended. Carried 4-0. C. Case No. PP 88-22 - OLIPHANT, LIZZA & ASSOCIATES, Applicant Request for approval of a precise plan of design to allow construction of two industrial buildings (18,770 square feet total) on St. Charles Place in the Palm Desert Business Center. Ms. Sass outlined the salient points of the staff report. She noted that preliminary approval had been received from the architectural commission. Staff reconrended approval. Commissioner Downs asked about the status of the new parking requirement for the industrial area. Mr. Diaz explained that an amendment was being considered to change the parking requirement to 4 per 1,000 or 1 per 250 square feet, along with the potential limitations in percentages of retail use. He stated that this project is six spaces over, but noted that with the precise plan, specific requirements can be placed on what percentage of building will be allowed for retail. Mr. Diaz indicated that the ordinance amendment should be before the commission the first meeting in March. Upon questioning by Cammissioner Ladlow, Ms. Sass clarified that there would be no compact car stalls in this development. Mr. Diaz stated that the spaces would all be nine feet. Chairman Erwood o ed the public testimony and asked the applicant to address the crnniissio n. MR. TONY LIZZA, applicant, asked if the commission had any questions. Commissioner Downs asked how much of the building would be retail. Mr. Lizza stated that he hoped none of the building would be retail, but storage tenan , some light industrial/printers, media type and graphics people. Ire stated that he world not pursue retail. Commissioner Downs asked if the applicant would have any problem with limiting retail uses to 20%. Mr. Lizza stated that was fine. 7 r BARCON DEVELOPMENT A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP - 42-575 MELANIE PLACE SUITE S PALM DESERT,CA 92260 RECEIVED TELEPHONE: (619)773-9024 FACSIMILE:(619)773-%65 June 6, 1996 JUN - 7 1996 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT City of Palm Desert cITYOF PALM DESERT 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 Attention: Phil Drell Director Denartment of Community Development Re: Tract 24254; "Sonata II" (north side of Hovley between Portola and Monterey) Dear Phil: Thank you for your courtesy in our telephone conversation yesterday regarding the Conditions of Approval and the Homebuyers Awareness Package("HAP")as to the referenced tract. As we discussed,the uniqueness, at the time the Sonata II map was approved, of the project(relative to the inclusion of two-story houses and our stated and explicit intention to sell lots without houses) resulted in the HAP as effectively a "condition" of the tract "by incorporation". As you indicated,we do not anticipate a practical problem in the future, since we assume that any new developer of the remaining lots at the tract will,in fact,voluntarily conform with the criteria set forth in the HAP (as all other tract Conditions must be complied with). Nevertheless, given that "forewarned is forearmed",we conveyed our May 30, 1996 package to Phil Joy of the City since we felt it prudent that the City be again aware of the planning issues raised by the HAP (and recently raised by several Sonata II homeowners) at the earliest possible time. Phil, thank you again for your responsiveness in this matter. Sincerely, Barcon Development, a Cali mia limited partnership By: I 'n L. Golds, General Partner ilg/ 11g/b.rccn.193 BARCON DEVELOPMENT A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 42-575 MELANIE PLACE SUITE S PALM DESERT,CA 92260 TELEPHONE: (619)773-9024 FACSIMILE:(619)773-%65 May 30, 1996 VIA HAND DELIVERY - FIDELITY TITLE COMPANY City of Palm Desert 73-5 10 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 Attention: Phil Joy Department of Community Development Re: Tract 24254; "Sonata II" (north side of Hovley between Portola and Monterey) Dear Phil: Pursuant to our telephone conversation this morning, enclosed please find copies of the following: 1. The "Homebuyer Awareness Package" CHAP')given to each of the 26 purchasers(from Barcon) of existing units at the project(note that there are 68 remaining improved lots); and 2. The relevant Conditions of Approval (specifically item 8 as to the HAP) imposed upon Barcon by the City. Phil, as we discussed, the HAP was approved by the City prior to its conveyance to purchasers, and the purchasers did sign and acknowledge receiving the HAP. However, because Barcon forfeited its interest in the remaining 68 lots in the project to the construction lender, the lender, and thus any party which purchases the lots from the lender, is not bound by the provisions of the HAP-specifically,for example,as to minimum residence size and location of two-story units. Given that the HAP, and the disclosures therein, were made by Barcon at the requirement of and after consultation with the City, we request that the City, in reviewing any future proposed residential construction at the project, reasonably require the builder/developer(s) to conform building plans with the provisions of the HAP. Although Barcon has no interest of any type in the project or subject property, we believe that City approvals consistent with the HAP will serve the best interests of the project, the City and existing Sonata II residents. As is apparent, certain Sonata II residents have inquired of us as to "what will be built" on the remaining lots at the project. Slg/barcon.191 I Phil Joy City of Palm Desert May 30, 1996 Page 2 Please let us know how the City views this matter. Thank you, and we look forward to hearing from you. Sincerely, Barcon Development, a4Califoimited partnershipB Golds, General Partner ilg/ Enclosures P.S. Phil, the telephone number to call me is(619) 862-1111. Irwin ilg/Dercon.191 6 10:48A D. L. FREEMAN INC. 619-773-9065 P.05 i 274431 in the Property shall be in one of the following Styles only. (a) A Meditarranean/Spanish style substantially similar or compatible with the Residences constructed by peoiarant, or (b) That style often re:erred to as *Desert Modern* blot iaentifiad with the Resi-4-,w;e„ designed by the Faun Desert architects of Holden and Johnson. All architectural and building plans for each Residence must be Approved by the city or Palm Desert. s&ctt- ign-2�2 = Exterior colors of the Residences to be constructed on Lots in the Property, for both stucco color and trim, shall be substantially similar or compatible (such as soft desert tones) with the colors similarly utilized by Declarant on the Residences 'constructed by Declarent. Secti�2_pb Any interior Lot line walls to be constructed by Owners shall be of the came slump stone walls as utilized typo men color of by Declarant an the Lots and Residences constructed in the Property by Declarant, Each Residenoe constructed in the Property must be completed with all Lot line walls completed: thus, an owner who constructs a Residence on a Lot will lave to complete all applicable Lot line walls if such Residence is the first completed among ad3acent lots. aeC L n7 Prior to completion of construction on a RSsidancs on a Lot in the Property, with completion defined AS the issuance by the City of Pn1R Desert of a *Certificate of Occupancy, the front yard landscaping shall be completed, with automated irrigation eyecen. Aache� Prior to the commencsant of construction of 6 10:48A D. L . FREEMAN INC. 619-773-9065 P .04 274431 9#10,11,18,19,20,21,22.23,24,25 of Tract clap 24234-11 phase 2 Lots 2,3,4,6,6,7,8,9,13,14,15,20,21,26,27 of Tract Map 24254-21 and phase 3 Lots I6,17,1l,19,22,23,24,29,3o,31 Of Tract Map 24254. These identified Lots may, but need not necessarily, be utilized for a two-story RasSdenco. Ail Other Lots within the property not Specifically identified in this paragraph are Only authorized by the City of palm Desert tis the construction of a one-story Residance, 9a^_tlnn n' AS to the Lots authorized by the City for a two-Story Residence, the following rules and restrictions shall apply, in addition to and as a supplement to any other rules or regulations promulgated by the City of Pala Desert and its residential approval process: (a) The side yard setbacks on two-story Residences shall be twelve (12) feet on each side, sc int.4:pro.a r ".a C+Zyr however, if a two-story Residence is designed so that effectively one aide of the Residence is at a one-etOry height (such as a split-level home), then the side Yard setback on the aide with the single story height maybe five (5) feet. (The aPPIACable side yard setbacks on a single story Residence are five (5) feet On each side). (b) The r font and rear yard setbacks for both. two-story, and single story Residences are as defined in the palm Desert Municipal Code. $ECtinn 2 OU The minimum Residence size, exclusive of garages Sad patio arose, for any Residence (one-story or two-story) constructed on a Lot in the Property shell be 1800 square feet of interior livable Space. 842112n 2 O• Each end every Residence constructed on Lots �g6 10:46A D.L . FREEMAN INC. 619-773-9065 P.03 274431 for the protection and improvement of the Property for the Purpose of ,enhancing the value, desirability and attractiveness Of the Property. All provisions of this Declaration are hereby imposed as equitable servitudes upon the Property end shall run with the land end be binding on and for the benefit of all of the Property and all parties having or acquiring any right title or interest in the Property, or any part thereof, and their successive owners and assigns. ARTICLE I It is the present intention of Declarant to develop lots on the Property with single family residences (individually a "Residence" and ccllectively the "Residences") on separate lots (individually a "Lot" and collectively the "Lots")r or to develop late for sale witkout Residences constructed by Declarant. ARTICLE II USR RRSrP2C =K3 The Property shall be held, used and enjoyed by each Owner (as defined below), subje=t to the following limitations and restrictions, and subject to the exemptions for Declarant set forth in this Declaration-.. "Owner" shall mean and refer to one or more persons or sa+tati "; whn alone or collectively are the record owner of a fee aimpie title to a Residence or Lot, but excluding those having any auch interest merely as security for the performance of an obligation, 9eetiOn j.ai The following Lots contained in the Property are approved by the City of Pals Desert for the construction of two-story P.esidPncesa Phase 1 Lots o i x ° 0 f a 0 F9799 '3„LS,90o00 'N B 'b2/ SE'66 SL .. SL 9L o8 O � nfs 10 p1\ OvV,S gY 9fZZ•1 ,i fpJb IElI•l 7L'if 5L SL 9L E9 V 107 ; VV ° '�oii a �.•", e /F7zs -d9N VIA— —. N v f: Lb'9o/ oo pOq n w b h n ^ w /° N ^ hOn N `Oo �Od Oorl o P �E.p// STSL 50'fL 05'EL 02'Sb IPIZ/ 4 N .� •° f r q b1 N OE'011 r6 0319�L f�:)u bO< � I O b ` E•) 59'OS SB'EL OS'EL � °j � 6 ° v Ow m I b /F'ZZF a &N Eb prvq /S p5'EL o5'fL /r�) NOw m r ON A u 2 6q)v O N •r m LU O o $� h `Oo ti 9LL 05'fL OEOS-EL h bl'0/I N e- d ,rs O OOw PO �8� /F'ZZF •„dONd21d9- — ;� v Eb Q O I ry h 2 w,f•1 IS OS'fL OS'EL /6t qv � � � � !/'Of/ ; Bbn 1.)n9'Efq U5b. O N to qOq n N®q ql�y NQo ��w q � D 0 6 u N o LO pu g Vr b w vN 9L OS'EL 05'fL m 0b156 16-Ell m° w� MNq b w� N(�ge NM ti �b N � fB'BO/ Sr I NOo NOo N©d d � ry ° ,O c ^Ory mr a6f) /s osEc /Z'bb[gall N'K elif•7 q 04.63 V 107 b 1 s 7AP19/F'62F -dZd-YY3f ry o ° b b o 'rF)/b'IE%I 16fE 29�f IZ'bb OS'EL Is k I rr I,cfl O o \ pO OsOro oa� � J n n n 0 _ 6.62 4L 73.50 49.21 �=17.87 34. l3So N O 0 NI ;wl n �Y ° P ti� - TEf?RAZA- 329.3/ 9R/VE o, m a ��y01 o0 0 o Lor A Eyb o L•3Z.18 34.4E L'17.8749.21 73.50 5/ p 1p 6 C �, A� OO.62 a A 1/�`'N l q\ NP N s V ob©OI _aO�n �n�%Am m H � �; o^J W VI b O '�• U II 3.91 95.40 73.50 73.50 76 W R b N //0.07 A O _ rl w 61 L•s3.66 a n p p b�9 Cal Yq ybp IlO.l/ a n 9/ 73.50 7.4.50 4, I n A A u _322.3/ 10 93 - -BARANDA ti EBtJ 0 57' I O "_i u LOT C N 110.19 73.60 73.50 5/ C•� ,q H / 44 I N w�V !•,. y14•8 9 pl, O {. I W S93 51\ 8b nr � I - 29E P �. b r 9� w b�u _ nO ^ _ n m llO./8 •u A y ro ro /Z1.01 95.30 73•50 73.500 76 y { O 00 Iro //O.ZZ O b W b N a a n O 30 30 O L•53 6Z C• o ^ n •p� n �+1 ro .4 a O V w9/ AI 73.50 1 73.50 51 //0.26 n 93 ry A war"" -322.3_1Li,8V W N - -CA-BA NA-' O N I �A 4 LOr C b A W ? A O ro .N 73.50 73.85 50.65 C,3 n b O I N n °j C• y 'l�b0b0 ?, 110.30 a w " of" o I O °Oro m Oro sOW sOti aO� V oO � 4. 95.Zo 73:50 73.AC; 76.65 //0.34 75.66 7Z- 7Z Z O O ro w N nOU ^Oq sOV aOm b4� m �o S13.66 72 72 50.65 \~ F. W I P n - -VIA - E©NBA- - o Lor A qY o r �^ 63 76 75 75 62.72 QI2.jl s01'(•Z746 eyo' � @ V OO ou9 2 _ U y 0 56 p iv p 0 04 i©A ny A W rrs�N Nh©� vp O ®ko w m 1p a 80 76 75 75 99.35 /Z9. B O N. 00008'57"E. 661.83 e I A I - O . 0 i : O a � � .� �.�!�~air�.� ,,� t � %Py� � �' � � � ___ ��.�� s.�II �:�. j ' � ,,�� ,� `i- f ,�,,,, -" r .�>> , ��. .�;, , 6• ��. .:i��. \` ��. `,��C�1�`V y ���I Via' . /!!;; I ,�ii `a f r\ � � ii ti: ��, j� �S• t j �l 1' ;;, . ,.., ,,. .,;;. _',..., •W<;: ��i ... ,;.�.,., . ,,.n �'' � - - �1\t �. - �`_ � � �' ^.Y � . � r `� �, , � v CITY OF PALM DESERT DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission DATE: February 18, 1997 CASE NO: TT 24254 Amendment #1 REQUEST: Approval of an amendment to the conditions of approval on Tentative Tract 24254 located on the north side of Hovley Lane, 1900 feet west of Portola Avenue, immediately west of Casablanca. APPLICANT: Golden Hills Property Management 6963 Douglas Boulevard Box 19 Granite Bay, CA 95746 1. BACKGROUND: TT 25254 was originally approved February 7, 1989. The approved map created 94 single family lots. The westerly 26 lots were built out and/or purchased. The easterly 68 lots remain vacant although street improvements have been completed. In 1989 Barcon presented plans for a mix of one and two story dwellings. Accordingly, Resolution No. 1332 was adopted by Planning Commission and it includes condition #4 as follows: 4. Front setbacks - 20' to main garage door, straight driveway; or 15' otherwise, rear setbacks - 15', side setbacks - 5' single story, 12' for two story; building height 15' maximum one story, 24' two story. and condition #9 which reads as follows: 9. All homes on perimeter lots shall be limited to 15 feet except where adjacent to San Tropez Apartments. Subsequent to the Planning Commission action staff, working in concert with Barcon, agreed to limit two story development to certain specific interior lots. - This additional stipulation was conveyed to lot purchasers through a Homebuyers Awareness package. II. PRESENT PROPOSAL: The remaining vacant 68 lots in the tract are to be purchased and developed by Golden Hills Property Management. GHPM proposes to build only one story homes, 18 feet maximum height with sizes ranging from 1800 square feet to 2300 square feet to 2700 STAFF REPORT TT 25254 AMENDMENT #1 FEBRUARY 18, 1997 square feet. In each instance the size does not include garage area. Plans for these homes are currently before the Architectural Review Commission. This current proposal, while it is consistent with our normal maximum height limit for single family, single story dwellings does not comply with conditions #4 and #9 of Resolution No. 1332. III. ANALYSIS: There are two (2) issues before the Planning Commission. First, the 15 foot height limit for single story dwellings and the setbacks associated with it in condition #4 (i.e. 20 foot front setback to garage door, straight driveway; or 15 feet; otherwise, rear setbacks 15 feet, side yards 5 feet). Second, the 15 foot height limit for perimeter lots except where adjacent to San Tropez Apartments. The 68 lots in question are all in excess of 8,000 square feet and range in size from 8,055 square feet to 8,568 square feet. The R-1 8,000 zone standards provide for front setback of 20 feet, rear 15 feet, sides minimum 5 feet with total of 14 feet, coverage limit of 35% and maximum height of 18 feet. The matter of limiting perimeter units to 15 feet in height was not discussed in the February 7, 1989 staff report but the condition exists. The existing units at Casablanca to the east are low profile single story units. The property to the north is still vacant. Considering that the Casablanca project ranges from 4.6 feet to 8.6 feet above the pad heights of the adjacent lots in Sonata II (lot numbers 8, 9, 10, 11 , 12, 13 and 14) we do not feel a need to alter the 18 foot maximum height limit. There will be no two story homes in this row of homes or on any of the remaining 68 lots. ZONING SETBACKS IN CHART FORM Existing Condition #4 Proposed New Setbacks Front Setback 20' to garage door 20' 15' to building Side Setback 5' each side 5' minimum - total of 14' Rear Setback 15' 15, Height Limit 15' 18, 2 STAFF REPORT TT 25254 AMENDMENT #1 FEBRUARY 18, 1997 IV. CONCLUSION: The existing conditions need to remain in place for the existing 26 homes which have been constructed. Staff will recommend that the remaining 68 lots in the Sonata II tract be allowed to develop consistent with the R-1 zone standards for lots less than 10,000 square feet (i.e., Municipal Code Chapter 25.16.050). V. RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. amending Planning Commission Resolution No. 1332 to permit the remaining vacant lots in TT 24254 to develop pursuant to the provisions of Municipal Code Chapter 25.16.050. VI. ATTACHMENTS: A. Draft resolution B. Legal notice C. Comments from city departments and other agencies D. Plans and exhibits Prepared by Steve Smith Reviewed and Approved by t Phil rell Am 3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONDITIONS IMPOSED ON A 94 LOT SINGLE FAMILY SUBDIVISION LOCATED NORTH OF HOVLEY LANE, 1900 FEET WEST OF PORTOLA AVENUE. CASE NO. TT 24254 AMENDMENT #1 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 18th day of February, 1997, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider the request by GOLDEN HILLS PROPERTY MANAGEMENT for the above mentioned project; and WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedure for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 95-105," in that the Director of Community Development has determined that the project has been previously assessed; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said Planning Commission did find the following facts and reasons to exist to justify granting approval of the amendment to the conditions of approval: 1 . The proposed changes to the conditions will result in only single story dwellings with a maximum height of 18 feet being constructed in the tract. 2. Single story homes are consistent with development in the area. 3. Single story homes are consistent with the Zoning Ordinance and General Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1 . That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the commission in this case. 2. That notwithstanding conditions #4 and #9 of Planning Commission Resolution No. 1332, that homes developed on Lots 27-32 inclusive on map 24254-1 , Lots 1-30 inclusive on map 24254-2, and Lots 1-32 inclusive on map 24254 shall comply with the provisions of Municipal Code Chapter 25.16.050 (Development standards for lots less than ten thousand square feet. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 18th day of February, 1997, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JAMES CATO FERGUSON, Chairperson ATTEST: PHILIP DRELL, Secretary Palm Desert Planning Commission 2 01/30/1997 15:04 916-652-1182 W G KIRKPATRICK PAGE 02 GHP GOLDEN KILLS PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 30 JANUARYY 1997 CITY OP PALM DZSERT PLANNING DEPARTMENT ATTENTION: KIL STEVE OMTH FAX NO.: 619 -- 341-7098 RZ: SONATA II DZVZLOPMENT To WHOM IT MAY CONCERN, THIS LZTTEIt IS TO REQOEST AN AMENDMENT TO CONDITION NO. 4 (CASE NO. TT 24354) OF PLANNING COMMISSION RZSOLVTION NO. 1339, CONDITION NO. 4 STATES THAT THE XAXW= ALLOWABLE XWQIIT FOR A ONE-STORY RM DZNCZ SHALL Bit 1&0, 24'0" MAXMMFOR A TWO-STORY RESIDENI- III LIGHT OF TICE PACT THAT WE AM ONLY ZU'ILDDIG ONE-STORY UNITSr WE WISH TO AMEND THE MAMU M ALLOWABLE HEIGHT To IVO" FOR ONE. STORY KMDDNCES. T=WOULD ALLOW US TO VAULT OUR INTERIOR CZnMQS THERZZ;Y CREATING A MORE OPZN/SPACIOUS FEELING FOR THE HOME OWNERS. THIS HEIGHT INCREAM WOULD NOT NEGATIVELY IMPACT THE LOOK OF THE WITH THE EX 9=0 SONATA II HOTMES, WHICH CURRENTLY C03181PMENT AND BT�or D BOTH ONE AND TWO-STORY UNITS. WE ARE CUMZNTLY BZFORZ TILE ARCHITECTURAL REVIZW C0109ITTZZ AND ARE WOR=a TOWARD RESOLVZQ THEIR CONCERNS. THANK Wo FOR. YOUR CONSIDERATION OF THE RBQUTXTZD HEIGHT AMENDMElit' . SINCERELY. t�r,Rt1eKPA� •" '�� f W�N�:..' � Y � «<hn� fY. J'Y' _ '7r.N tS '. ♦\ .'mot fir}. . . " w»r i,- / PLANNING CGVMSSION RESOLUTION NO. 1332 ODWITIONS OF APPFOVAL CASE NO. TP 24254 Department of Community Development: 1. The final map shall conform substantially with the tentative tract map as modified by the following conditions. 2. Applicant shall obtain clearance from the following agencies prior to construction: Public Works Department Palm Desert Architectural Commission City Fire Marshal ,Coachella Valley Water District Building and Safety Department Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to the department of building and safety at the time of issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. 3. The applicant shall pay all applicable fees in accordance with city policy including those for lizard and art in public places. 4. Front setbacks - 20' to main garage door, straight driveway; or 15' otherwise, rear setbacks - 15' , side setbacks - 5' single story, 12' for two story; building height 15' maximumone story, 24' two story. IC)' <;+,ee+ S(cIr-- 5. Twenty feet of landscaped area along Portola and Hovley for an 8' wide meandering sidewalk. 6. Property decorative walls required at minimum 6' , and maximum 8' if used in conjunction with retaining walls. 7. Perimeter decorative walls required at minimum 61 , and maximum 8' if used in conjunction with retaining walls. 8. Prospective home buyers awareness package shall be signed by all prospective homeowners of tract prior to entering escrow approved by director of community development with copies sent to community development department after signature of prospective home buyers has been obtained. 9. All hones on perimeter lots shall be limited to 15 feet except where adjacent to San Tropez Apartments.l 10. Block walls (decorative along street frontages) required to be 6' for perimeter of project and along interior property lines, except along the east boundary of the tract; wall shall be located on property line, 3 pl,AtaUM CKM4ISSICN RPSOLUPICN NO. 1332 minimum 5' in height and 4' in height above adjacent Casablanca pad elevations. Department of Public Works- 1. Drainage fees, in accordance with Section 26.49 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code and Palm Desert Ordinance No. 507, shall be paid prior to recordation of final map. 2. Drainage facilities, as designated within the Northside Area Drainage Master Plan shall be provided to the specifications of the Director of Public Works. 3. Storm drain construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study prepared by a civil engineer that is reviewed and approved by the department of public works. 4. Signalization fees, in accordance with City of Palm Desert Resolution No's. 79-17 and 79-55, shall be paid prior to recordation of final map. 5. Full public improvements, as required by Sections 26.44 and 26.40 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code, shall be installed in accordance with applicable city standards. 6. As required under Palm Desert Municipal Code Section 26.28, and in accordance with Sections 26.40 and 26.44, complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted to the director of public works for checking and approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. Off-site improvement plans to be approved by. public works department and a surety posted to guarantee the installation of required off-site improvements prior to recordation of the final map. Such off-site improvements shall include, but not be limited to, curb and gutter, asphalt paving and concrete sidewalk in an appropriate size and configuration-. "As-built" plans shall be submitted to, and approved by, the director of public works prior to the acceptance of the improvements by the city. 7. Improvement plans for water and sewer systems shall be approved by the respective service districts with "as-built" plans submitted to the department of public works prior to the project final. 8. Applicant shall cause to have established a landscaping district under the 1972 Landscaping and Lighting Act for the maintenance along Hovley Lane. 9. As required under Section 12.16 and 26.44 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code, all , existing utilities shall be undergrounded per each respective utility district's recommendation. If determined to be unfeasible, applicant shall agree to participate in any future utility undergrounding district. 4 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLAM= QbMISSICN FEBRUARY 7, 1989 B. Case No. TP 24254 - BARCON DEVELCPm NP, Applicant Request for approval of a 94 single family home subdivision located on the north side of Hovley Lane, 1900 feet west of Portola Avenue. Mr. Joy outlined the salient points of the staff report. He noted that the applicant had provided elevations for two-story hones and received conceptual approval from the architectural commission. He explained that the two-story hones would be located within the interior of the project and one-story along the perimeter. Staff recommended approval based on the following reasons: 1) zoning is PR rather than R-1 and PR zoning allows up to 30' of building height, and these homes would be 24' high; 2) PR zoning is intended to give flexibility to the commission and the commission has power to grant the two-story in the interior of the project; and 3) project calls for consolidation of five parcels and with this type of integrated development, the developer should be allowed to do something extra. He felt that the city was looking for consolidation of lots. He also indicated that another factor to consider was the two-story San Tropez Villas adjacent to this project. Staff recommended approval with modification to Public Works Condition No. 13 to include 50' streets on cul-de-sac lots. Commissioner Ladlow asked for and received clarification regarding the location of the two-story lots and cul-de-sac streets. Chairman Erwood questioned Public Works Condition No. 8 regarding landscaping maintenance for the property outside the wall, noting that Monterey Meadows was required to post a maintenance bond. After discussion, Mr. Folkers determined that further language needed to be added. ` Mr. Diaz stated that the condition could read that the applicant shall cause to have established a landscaping district under the 1972 Landscaping and Lighting Act for the maintenance along Hovley Lane. The applicant concurred with the amended conditions. Chairman Elwood opened the public testimony and asked the applicant to address the commission. ., MR. DEMIS FREEMAN, '41-625 Eclectic, clarified that they were planning four or five unit types ranging from 1750 to 2500 square feet and the drawing on display was only one representation--there would be altered elevations to provide a mix. He thought that there would also be a mix along the north property line because they would be facing a two-story development, as well as two-story on the McBail property. 4 MINUTES PALM DESERT PI"TI . COMMISSION FEBRUARY 7, 1989 Mr. Diaz indicated that the MaBail property did not have approved plans so staff was reconnending one story along that property line. Mr. Joy stated that the only perimeter location they could have two story would be along the San Tropez property. Mr. Freeman stated that they would also be very sensitive with two-story and one-story privacy. He indicated they would build the development in a manner to keep people from looking down into someone's back yard. He noted their previous success with their two-story development in La Quinta. He indicated that it was their intention to have an assessment district; single- family no association bond for the first two months and then the 1972 Act. Mr. Diaz informed the developer that with the condition, it meant that the applicant would pay for the establishment of the district and the assessment engineer. Mr. Freeman concurred. Commissioner Whitlock requested further clarification on the location of the two-story units sines it would make up 40% and knowing that the perimeter would have to be single-story. Mr. Freeman indicated that the two-story units would be primarily within the cul-de-sac streets, noting that they might not be able to accomplish 40%, but that was what they were requesting. He stated that most of the two- story units world be back to back. Chairman Erwood asked if anyone present wished to speak in FAVOR of the project. There was no one. Chairman EYwood asked if anyone wished to speak in OPPOSITION to the project. MR. CHUCK FARANELA, representing the Casa Blanca Homeowners Association, stated that he was concerned with grading. He felt grading should be done so that no single-family dwellings could look into their property. Mr. Joy explained that the applicant had submitted grading plans and the pad heights were approximately six feet below the adjacent homes in Casa Blanca and. single family homes would be nine feet above the pad elevations of the Casa Blanca development. Also, in discussions regarding the alley_ way, a condition was included that this project would be constructing a wall along the Casa Blanca boundary and about 25' away from the Casa Blanca wall. He stated that a Casa Blanca representative indicated that they might be tearing dcwn their wall in the future and the new wall from this development would be the boundary between the two projects. Mr. Joy also informed commission 5 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLAtOU2U COM IISSIo4 FEBRUARY 7, 1989 that a condition had been added for prospective hone buyers notifying them that two-story homes will be built within the project. MR. DANIEL BARNES, 41-613 Aventine Court .in Casa Blanca, expressed concern about units per acre and asked if it was within the city's projections for that area. Cc mmissioner Downs stated that the proposal was lower than what could be allowed. Mr. Joy stated that the zoning allows five units per acre and this development was requesting 3.96 and Casa Blanca is five units per acre. Mr. Barnes asked about price projections. Mr. Diaz explained that the city cannot require a specific price on any unit, except for affordable housing. Mr. Barnes was concerned about elevations blocking his views to the west, noting a past problem between Monterey Meadows and the Sagebrush complex. He also asked about the widening of the road. He noted that the road was widened up to the west boundary of Casa Blanca and after that it reverts to two lanes up to Monterey. He asked if there were any consideration to widening the street all the way down. Mr. Diaz explained that this project would be conditioned to widen the road in front of its project, but beyond that to the west would be widened when that property develops. Mr. Barnes felt that going from two lanes to four lanes to two lanes created a dangerous driving situation. Chairman Erwood closed the public testimony. Commissioner Downs stated that he was in favor of the project. Commissioner Whitlock concurred, moving for approval, subject to the two-story units being in the interior, in addition to amendments to Public works conditions 8 and 13 and.the assessment district. Commissioner Ladlow expressed concern about starting a precedent within PR-5 zoning, but Mr. Diaz did not feel a precedent would be started. Action: Moved by Commissioner Whitlock, seconded by Camiissicner Downs, adopting the findings as presented by staff. Carried 4-0. 6 MINUlT;S a PALM DESERT PLANNING cave SICK FEBRUARY 7, 1989 Moved by Commissioner Whitlock, seconded by Commissioner Downs, adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 1332, approving TT 24254, subject to conditions as amended. Carried 4-0. C. Case No. PP 88-22 - OLIP1W1T, LIZZA & ASSOCIATES, Applicant Request for approval of a precise plan of design to allow construction of two industrial buildings (18,770 square feet total) on St. Charles Place in the Palm Desert Business Center. Ms. Sass outlined the salient points of the staff report. She toted that preliminary approval had been received from the architectural commission. Staff reconuended approval. Commissioner Downs asked about the status of the new parking requirement for the industrial area. Mr. Diaz explained that an amendment was being considered to change the parking requirement to 4 per 1,000 or 1 per 250 square feet, along with the potential limitations in percentages of retail use. He stated that this project is six spaces over, but noted that with the precise plan, specific requirements can be placed on what percentage of building will be allowed for retail. Mr. Diaz indicated that the ordinance amendment should be before the commission the first meeting in March. Upon questioning by Commissioner Ladlow, Ms. Sass clarified that there would be no compact car stalls in this development. Mr. Diaz stated that the spaces would all be nine feet. Chairman Erwood ed the public testimony and asked the applicant to address the commission. MR. TONY LIZZA, applicant, asked if the commission had any questions. Commissioner Dooms asked how much of the building would be retail. Mr. Lizza stated that he hoped none of the building would be retail, but storage tenan , some light industrial/printers, media type and graphics people. He stated that he would not pursue retail. Commissioner Downs asked if the applicant would have any problem with limiting retail uses to 20$. Mr. Lizza stated that was fine. 7 • r BARCON DEVELOPMENT A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 42-575 MELANIE PLACE SUITE S PALM DESERT,CA 92260 RECEIVED TELEPHONE: (619)773-9M4 - FACSIMILE:(619)773-9065 June 6, 1996 JUN - 7 1996 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT City of Palm Desert CRYOF PALM DESERT 73-5 10 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 Attention: Phil Drell Director Department of Community Development Re: Tract 24254; "Sonata II" (north side of Hovley between Portola and Monterey) Dear Phil: Thank you for your courtesy in our telephone conversation yesterday regarding the Conditions of Approval and the Homebuyers Awareness Package("HAP")as to the referenced tract. As we discussed,the uniqueness,at the time the Sonata II map was approved,of the project(relative to the inclusion of two-story houses and our stated and explicit intention to sell lots without houses) resulted in the HAP as effectively a "condition" of the tract "by incorporation". As you indicated,we do not anticipate a practical problem in the future,since we assume that any new developer of the remaining lots at the tract will,in fact,voluntarily conform with the criteria set forth in the HAP (as all other tract Conditions must be complied with). Nevertheless, given that "forewarned is forearmed",we conveyed our May 30, 1996 package to Phil Joy of the City since we felt it prudent that the-City be again aware of the planning issues raised by the HAP (and recently raised by several Sonata II homeowners) at the earliest possible time. Phil, thank you again for your responsiveness in this matter. Sincerely, Barcon Development, a Cali rnia limited partnership By: I 'n L. Golds, General Partner ilg/ Slg/Earcon.l9J ' BARCON DEVELOPMENT A CALIFORNA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 42-575 MELANIE PLACE SUITE S PALM DESERT,CA 92260 TELEPHONE:(619)773-9024 FACSIMILE: (619)773-%65 May 30, 1996 VIA HAND DELIVERY - FIDELITY TITLE COMPANY City of Palm Desert 73-5 10 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 Attention: Phil Joy Department of Community Development Re: Tract 24254; "Sonata II" (north side of Hovley between Portola and Monterey) Dear Phil: Pursuant to our telephone conversation this morning, enclosed please find copies of the following: 1. The "Homebuyer Awareness Package" ("HAP")given to each of the 26 purchasers(from Barcon) of existing units at the project(note that there are 68 remaining improved lots); and 2. The relevant Conditions of Approval (specifically item 8 as to the HAP) imposed upon Barcon by the City. Phil, as we discussed, the HAP was approved by the City prior to its conveyance to purchasers, and the purchasers did sign and acknowledge receiving the HAP. However, because Barcon forfeited its interest in the remaining 68 lots in the project to the construction lender, the lender, and thus any party which purchases the lots from the lender, is not bound by the provisions of the HAP-specifically,for example,as to minimum residence size and location of two-story units. Given that the HAP, and the disclosures therein, were made by Barcon at the requirement of and after consultation with the City,we request that the City, in reviewing any future proposed residential construction at the project, reasonably require the builder/developer(s) to conform building plans with the provisions of the HAP. Although Barcon has no interest of any type in the project or subject property, we believe that City approvals consistent with the HAP will serve the best interests of the project, the City and existing Sonata II residents. As is apparent, certain Sonata II residents have inquired of us as to "what will be built" on the remaining lots at the project. Slg/garcon.191 Phil Joy City of Palm Desert May 30, 1996 Page 2 Please let us know how the City views this matter. Thank you, and we look forward to hearing from you. Sincerely, Barcon Development, a Califo 'a limited partnership By: I n L. Golds, General Partner ilg/ Enclosures P.S. Phil,the telephone number to call me is (619) 862-1111. Irwin ilg/Daroon.191 6 10:48A D.l. FREEMAN INC. 619-773-9065 P.05 µ 2'74433 in the Property shall be ir. one of the followinq styles only. (a) a Meditarranean/Spmnish style substantially similar or compatible with the Residences constructed by Declarant, or (b) That style often reZerred to as 'Desert MOderne best "Ontifisd with .the ResiAoncan designed by the Palm Desert architects of Holden and Johnson. All architectural and building plans for each Residence must be approved by the city of Palm Desert, 2e2*1212 U Exterior colors of the Residsnces to be constructed on Lots in the Property, for both stucco color and trim, shall be substantially similar or compatible (such as soft desert tones) with the colors similarly utilized by Declarant on the Residences constructed by Declarant. $ettion 2.D6 Any interior Lot line walls to be constructed by Owners shall be of the Cage type and color of slump stone walls as utilized by Declarant on the Lots and Residences constructed in the Property by Declarant, Each Reeidenoe constructed in the Property must be completed with all Lot line walls 0"Pletedv thus, an owner who constructs a Residence on a Lot will have to complete all applicable Lot line walls if such Resiear>ce is the first completed aaong- adjacent lots. 2eCiiCD_2..QZ Prior to completion of construction on a Residence on a Lot in the Property, with completion defined as the issuance by the City of Pnlm Desert of a 'Certificate of occupancy, the front yard landscaping shall be completed, with automated irrigation system. 5a91ion os Prior to the commencement of construction of E 6 10:48A D. L . FREEMAN INC. 619-773-9065 P .04 a 274431 9110,11,18,19,20,22,22,23,24,23 of Tract Nap 24254-1t Phasa a Lots 2,3,4,6,6,7,8,9,13,14,15,20,22,26,27 of Tract Nap 24254-21 and Phase 3 Lots 16,17,18,19,22,23,24,29,:C,31 of Tract Map 24254. Theme identified Late may, but no" not necessarily, be utilized for a two-story Residence.Lots A21 other within the Property not spe'cificaliy identified in this Paragraph are only authorized by the city of Palm Desert for the construction of a ane-story Residence. ststtm"- " to the Lots authorized by the City for a two-Story Residence, the following roles and restrictions shall apply, in addition to and as a supplement tp any other rules or regulations promulgated by the City of Pala Desert and its residential approver process: (a) The side yard setbacks on two-story ReSidenoes shall be twelve (12) feet on each side, S� i��pr'vti+L r `xie Cl�yr however, if a two-Story Residence is deaigna:d so that effectively one side of the Residence is at a one-Story height (such as a split-level bone), than the side Yard setback on the side with the single story height maybe five (5) feat, (The app).icable Side yard setbacks on a single story Residence arm fives (S) feat on each side). (b) -The front and rear yard setbacks for both two-story, and single story Residences are as ;le"Ined in the Palm Desert municipal Code. Seetine 2 = The minimum Residence size, ejoclusive of garages a-nd patio areas, for any Residence (one-story or twO-9tOrY) constructed on a Lot in the property shall be 18oO square feet of interior livable space. Sacit„n 2 a1 Each 8nd every Residence . constructed on Lots ,g6 10:46A D.L. FREEMAN INC. 619-773-9065 P.03 1-96 j ' 2'i4431 for the protection and improvement of the Property for the Purpose of enhancing the value, desirability and attractiveness of the Property. All provisions of this Declaration are hereby imposed sa equitable servitudes upon the Property and shall run With the land and be binding on and for the benefit of all of the Property and all parties having or acquiring any right title or interest in the Property, or any part thereof, and their successive owners and assigns. ARTICLE I � I It is the Present intention of Declarant to develop lots on the Property with single family residences (individually a "Residence" and ccllectively the "Residences") on separate lots (individually a "Lot" and collectively the "Lots")$ or to develop lots for sale witLaut Residences constructed by Declarant. ARTICLE II USE RrqTR?S=0X4 The Property shall be held, used and enjoyed by each owner (as defined below), eubje_t to the following limitations and restrictions, and subject to the exemptions fcr Declarant set forth in this Declaratior.. "owner" shall mean and refer to one or more persons or enttt.ea whn alone or collectively are the record owner of a fee simple title to a Residence or Lot, but excluding thane having eery such interest merely as security for the performance of an obligation. 2ftQ1 �^ Z, The following Late contained in the Property are approved by the City of Pella Desert for the construction of two-story P.esidenees: Phase i Lots �7 4 li g ° a o FH 799 '3112IS,HDo00 'N B '621 5E'66 SL .. SL 9L Oil v Vm YN V h h Q OOwN N O1®w N_ �QNN ©•N now now wN v C b p � O ^O4 V55By szz.iy°.a/ Ifll•7 2L'2f 5L 5L fL Ef Vtib /�J d 4wb° V 107 ° —VIA— St 00 ZL 2L 9905 i. \ A �q N r bLb'90/ NOS pOo' mOo �Oo be, Y ZL + TL fTSL N bf•O// Sf St 5B AL OS'fL o2'S6 Will W b w b h r PON r 1. mNOw N w NOw wlO- OI °jOo `w1 d N t\ ry O q d 53.58 4 N WWI 6 ) bO! N I O b ; F•J 59'OS SHAL 051EL Eb f2'011 wq IS OS'fL OS'£L ° or ,0` ♦r 22'OI/ ml0 m °O °- � °O mNOO R °+O� �<� yl O n o hr `Oo L. 9L 05'EL OS'EL Of'S6 l0'l2/ `©0 9q6 J b L � N o pO; ml A00 /F'ZZF I>ONbr`1C9 — & y fb v O w ^ Y 5fL OSFL !/'OI/ L0'01/ N® a/d6Oryp2�/Y➢'lYwOS.7:nm C�60qq N- I�O I �. ''. Vqj P b N w N 9L 05'EL 05-EL m 06'56 WE/ N M V ti r l0 /B'BO/ Sy I NOp NOo too" N bN 61'2f•7 O , O a wOw mP af') /5 05'EL R'66 Lf't 1.7 Z Ee 1Ed N®o a V J07 i` w o b J wbj©w w 4 rF'/Y2f%I IRE 27'f MO. COW IS m Y)OMo Oo - O C` O m - City of Palm Desert 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260-2578 TELEPHONE (619)346-0611 FAX(619)341-7098 February 14, 1 97 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION ACTION CASE NO.: TT 24254 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): ERIC MILLER, ARCHITECT, A.I.A. for SONATA II, 901 Rio Grande Blvd.,N.W., Suite D-220A,Albuquerque,N.M. 87104; JERRY FITZPATRICK, 6963 Douglas Blvd., Box 19, Granite Bay, CA 95746 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Further consideration of revised elevations and additional model units LOCATION: North of Hovley Lane, 1900 feet west of Portola Avenue ZONE: PR-5 Upon reviewing the submitted plans and presentations by staff and by the applicant, the architectural commission approved the color scheme and revised elevations for the model complex as submitted as well as a zone area of a minimum of 14 feet between homes with gable ends,otherwise, there has to be a hip roof on at least one end. Date of Action: February 11, 1997 Vote: Carried 6-0 (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within ten (10) of the date of the decision. Any amendments to this approved plan would need to be resubmitted to commission for approval.) STAFF COMMENTS: It is your responsibility to submit the plans approved by the architectural commission to the department of building and safety. CONTINUED CASES: In order to be placed on the next meetings agenda, new or revised plans must be submitted no later than 9:00 a.m. the Monday eight days prior to the next meeting. R=r d Pape MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION FEBRUARY 11, 1997 they will have flat roofs. Action: It was moved by Commissioner O'Donnell, seconded by Commissioner Gregory, to approve the exterior color scheme for Plan 1 as submitted. Motion carried 6-0. B. Preliminary Plans: 1. CASE NO.: LTT-242547 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): ERIC MILLER, ARCHITECT, A.I.A. for (SONATA E,901 Rio Grande Blvd.,N.W., Suite D-220A,Albuquerque,N.M. 871-4 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Further consideration of revised elevations and additional model units LOCATION: North of Hovley Lane, 1900 feet west of Portola Avenue ZONE: PR-5 Mr. Smith presented pictures of the existing one and two story homes and indicated that the commission was looking at a re-designed elevation with a hip roof. The applicant,Mr. Kilpatrick, asked the commission to approve the gable roofs with the condition that he guarantee that there will be a certain number of homes with the hip roof re-design as shown today. Mr. Smith reported that there were two conditions on the original tract map that will be on the next planning commission agenda. He indicated that staff will be asking to eliminate these two conditions and recommend that they adhere to the city's basic R-1 standards. Mr. Smith explained that the applicant would like to proceed with the model complex with the commitment that at some time in the future that a minimum of 15% of the 68 homes have hip roofs as shown today. Commissioner Urrutia expressed his concerns with the possibility of two gable ends used where there are minimum setbacks. He suggested that whenever the distance between two homes is less than 14 feet they must have at least one hip roof. If they meet or exceed the 14 feet of separation, then they can use two gable ends. 6 ( I MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION FEBRUARY 11, 1997 Action: It was moved by Commissioner Urrutia, seconded by Commissioner Holden, to approve the three (3) 18 foot high gable roofed plans, the color scheme, and the hip roofed house plans as submitted subject to there being a minimum of 14 feet of separation between homes with gable ends; otherwise, there has to be a hip roof on at least one end. Motion carried 6-0. C. Miscellaneous: 1. CASE NO.: APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): GREG POE, 74-470 Goleta Avenue, Palm Desert, CA 92260 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Consideration of height and material exception for backyard wall facing along Fred Waring Drive LOCATION: 74-470 Goleta Avenue ZONE: R-1 S.P. Mr. Alvarez presented photographs of the home stating that the applicant is requesting a exception to the height limit and material indicating that Mr. Poe wants to install precision block at eight feet high. After a lengthy discussion with Mr. Poe, the following action was taken. Action: It was moved by Commissioner Connor, seconded by Commissioner O'Donnell, to approve the fencing at a maximum height of seven feet to match the color and material of the adjacent slump stone wall to the east. Wall to extend around the comer a minimum of two blocks. Motion carried 5-0,Commissioner Urrutia Absent. 7 Cory of Palm Desert 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260-2578 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 FAX (619)341-7098 January 30, 19 7 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION ACTION CASE NO.: TT 24254 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): ERIC MILLER, ARCHITECT, A.I.A. for SONATA II, 901 Rio Grande Blvd.,N.W., Suite D-220A, Albuquerque, N.M. 87104 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of architectural plans for Plan A, B, and C LOCATION: North of Hovley Lane, 1900 feet west of Portola Avenue ZONE: PR-5 Upon reviewing the submitted plans and presentations by staff and by the applicant,the architectural commission continued the case to allow the applicant to resolve the issues of heights, setbacks, lack of solar protection, and roof lines (i.e. hip roof in place of gable roof where minimum side yard setbacks exist). Date of Action: January 28, 1997 Vote: Carried 6-0 (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen(15) days of the date of the decision. Any amendments to this approved plan would need to be resubmitted to commission for approval.) STAFF COMMENTS: It is your responsibility to submit the plans approved by the architectural commission to the department of building and safety. CONTINUED CASES: In order to be placed on the next meetings agenda, new or revised plans must be submitted no later than 9:00 a.m. the Monday eight days prior to the next meeting. aecciea Paper T� MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION JANUARY 28, 1997 B. Preliminary Plans: 1. CASE NO.: (TT 24254 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): ERIC MILLER, ARCHITECT, A.I.A. for CSONATA II,'901 Rio Grande Blvd., Suite D-220A, Albuquerque,N.M. 87104 NATURE OF PROJECTIAPPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of architectural plans for Plan A, B and C LOCATION: North of Hovley Lane, 1900 feet west of Portola Avenue ZONE: PR-5 Mr. Smith reported that the plans were a new phase of 68 homes at Sonata II on the north side of Hovley Lane East between Casa Blanca on the east and the existing Sonata development on the west. The architect, Mr. Eric Miller, provided a color board and introduced Mr. Jerry Kilpatrick and Mr. John Rinehy. Commissioner Gregory discussed his concerns with the lack of solar protection on the south side where there were gable roofs and stressed that this was an issue that needed to be addressed. Mr. Miller noted that there were 26 units built in the first phase and that these plans reflect these original units. He added that they will be using insulated glazing and inside blinds. Commissioner Un utia asked what the typical distances were between the buildings. Mr. Miller explained that the worse case is Model C where it would be 12' to 15' between buildings.Mr. Smith noted his concerns regarding the east end of the project as it abuts the existing Casa Blanca development. He suggested that in this area the applicant might want to look at a lower pitch roof to coincide with what is existing. Commissioner Holden explained that where there are minimum setbacks they have used the maximum roof heights available at 18 feet with only 10 feet between houses. He noted that if the distance between the homes is 20 feet or more, then the heights would be acceptable. Commissioner Un utia suggested using some hip roofs on the ends rather than using all gable ends. He added that the front elevations were O.K. and that it was the side yards that he was concerned about. Mr. Kilpatrick noted his concerns with changing to hip roofs as it would change the interiors that they are trying to achieve. Mr. Buchanan suggested a modified hip 4 MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION JANUARY 28, 1997 roof. Commissioner Holden agreed and added that the change to hip roofs did not have to be done on each and every home. Commissioner O'Donnell added that the exposure on the gable ends increases the cooling load and this was an issue that had to be addressed. Commissioner Urrutia agreed and noted the windows that get direct sun. Commissioner Van Vliet felt that the applicant should re-study the elevations and site plan and return to the commission with the changes. Commissioner Holden added that they also needed to point out what the set backs are. Mr. Smith asked the commission if they wanted to address the issue of the easterly most units adjacent to Casa Blanca. Commissioner Gregory felt that this should be included in the re-study. Action: It was moved by Commissioner Urrutia, seconded by Commissioner Van Vliet, to continue the case to allow the applicant to resolve the issues of heights,setbacks,lack of solar protection, and roof lines. Motion carried 6-0. IV. Miscellaneous: 1. Future Proposal for Property at Cook Street and Gerald Ford: Mr. Smith reported that staff received a proposal yesterday for the property at Cook Street and Gerald Ford. The item is not on the agenda,however,he thought the commission could provide some feedback. He indicated that the question the applicant would like to propose is if it is the architecture theme they wanted. Commissioner Holden stated that it was not. Mr. Smith noted that it was not just a service station/convenience store but that they have added lube bays, detailing bays, car wash, and a drive-thru for the convenience store. Mr. Smith added that he suggested to the applicant that the blank car wash wall facing Gerald Ford Drive should be bermed up to the roof. This will be adjacent to a food park that is being planned to the north and east of this property. The applicant,Mr.Marvin Roos, noted that he would like to take back some specific criteria back to the architect. Commissioner Holden would like to see plain, clean desert contemporary architecture. Commissioner Urrutia indicated that the roof form needed to be restudied, i.e. lack of overhangs and solar protection. He suggested using other materials such as masonry, veneer, brick, stone, or split-face block. Commissioner Holden indicated that he would rather see the three buildings tied together instead of three different structures. Commissioner Un utia added that on a site this size there should be more space available adjacent to the car wash to dry off the vehicles. Mr. Smith noted that he explained to the applicant that the city does not allow drive-thus but that they have planned this for the future possibility of the city approving drive-thrus. 5 6'Ar 74, Vw -� .:fit. vws 4Aa ' .I rf 44(t I `'fie•` �� i Ji:. _ — _----_— __ s . ; .p' � _ „ i �+' _ r _� _ u.-- t __ � � � � _..- _ �....�.E _ _�� _ �� y .. �. �` �� _ - _ �;�: _ _ � ��1� �y�� � �NATfl' ft 1 Z)�V To Z9957- -_ �, , . �, �.. z .. - - - �_ - -- _ � �_ ,�� - a��T A21( . � \��\� ` � � \ , w \�\ � \ ���; 2 ��\ f�- : -� ` °���� �« - . _ . �2�—� < � < . !� � '�. . ���/ / y . dZz \ - � \�C � \ } . � � . ��ƒ \ � ^ .«« > \ » � > \ y : � �. . . . ^ : ' � ° � . � . � � i[� ANIZ6Y COUf'1� 5.z'. off oJ_ w •:t.; „ ter i r 1 r "� 'T.� `I. Yl � /t rr �` ' 1 _.I, r l' � �� . t -. 74°77� � ys -�. r.. .. _ �'' � r _ _/ .�. �r � - - 1MM7"' _,,', _— ``. _ v' t -. a.? �' � a ..1 � _ ' ,. ... _ .�._ • � X. • .4 A. ��, � �` ' .a I , i ., Al yt oc K{�J,. . •�is i �.;�. ±. �;°, i ,� c ., .:� �� I��da.�_ Y dr: � � d }i � ,oG �, ,,�. . �_ r n Sy,. � � ,�°s. -x -a.�.., � 'x �ild,;,b�'� !. - III !!I ": ur . � ; ,; �__ \� .: r r' 1�I �� ." r r a 1 � NT 1 +J�y s � _ f a _ _ , �, � q ,�, �,a �� , ��,, , •aw + , I � ,�• c "' ru "`e :1 �� v ' y/ x 7 -�=_ . � � _� �-� _ ' _ '� .....•. ,- �_. ,� � ,r >� ��II� ,,, , � p�3 __-. n�... Y{�.. � .af - i 's °�' � ;�� -. - - - - - 9h�ytB f-* / �• i a �. +. N I L 1 `+F F R �,ES., DesFp�i¢ 19 . 10 F ed° �8�� �� �rfllll V�7.�l1l5 /99 1016t 0 u.s, POSfA 3.510 FRED WARIFRIVE,_ACM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 70 {fNOfA �, LLI CT) w rn FIE AQON CHECKED _ ] NOP.EC'MAC Y — 62 -0 06 / J $ F*Vwz0 C S B At A Sp1 '# (o m ? pnfMv:orwTi I500 Oly pi BIUJ d aIJ LLI Ds cics. 900 IasucNme>� � NOEUDHlJN� 1� MO MWTNOAODVi£'.S� FOMMMMOPOOSSRM— -..fa filitlIlifiIII1I,IIIInI11Ifilliff1lll till„tif11ni11„Istill J .. I i 207 Gf3N _ _ __ - fiG�1-�BL0 ARDEN W C 2 S 16- O6 2 V 205 �� ��2j221 g 21 g -_ �� k = P4 204 1 , � �,tj ootp ,o - i Ar ----- 2:1 - = 2:1 - - 11zi `L \1 4� j < 1 1 a 5 ,WALL- - -- --.I 208 - - 4 z05 - PE 206.E I� % 2 .3 1 FF 206.10 - FF 206.4 FF 206.80' ,,4` N�€' FF 207.3 PE 2 5.80 P 205.60 PE 205.9 I v PE 206.80 1 � /�� � i 1 202_ l 206 0� \206. 41 �PE 206.3 > os. f i ZOh� �p5 N s i en r r 0 a �I 6 a F \ � � � � 206.7 I _�-- � FF 212.80 205. 5 TC 20 .98 C 204. 6 -- T 6 TC 2()4.59 TC 04.99/� TC 205.23 TC 205.3 TC 205. 8 TC = 204.58 204. FL 0 .48 FL 203. 6 F 20 6( FL 2 4. 04.49 L 20�7 /; 4, ry F � T _ � N 89'42'4e, E 14400 - 711.99' 1 I +oo �,�' Off. \ I T �7 00' �__<ny TP'203.6 TP 0 8 , � � .OQ% � ��- � �a O � 206 1 � I 3 � Q r �' - 1 `fiC 205.02 TC 204.25 C 204.21\_\= fC 4.91 �'R 1105.34 1 < i�9 �P 52 FL 203.75 �r - 20 .8 + �-oo--c�,� �- -- (� FZ O juj 9, 1- °per w -- I w �� ny ti I LLI-- + 204.1 .. � °S 10 0� Of}. w ch. i 1 " ' [] rw -- _ FF 211 .50 AJ AS t I °� - O L � � _ �o o A �� lbo 206.44D O CO 2060 E 206. FF_ 205.30 PE0460 - --- 206. 0 z; -�-.. • o 5 2os 2p4 0 U 2 , �f� �O�p pE 204.8 �� $ p� - 20 206 � zp9 ' _ 2oS� ��� I w 0 -- /) C I: FF 206.20 R UJ F r O 0 o J o o , o r41 � PE_-205,70 % I ! i U °, I FF -204.80 FF 204 8 _ ---- _2 ' i I Z FF 211 .70 °A FF 2 6'10 _ PE 20 PE -204.30 1 _ - �}----- PE 205.E ' , _ 2 Z 11 2to Q �1 tiA - - - - - - r- S L O© J I --- - -� -zos - �f) �J Q ----� j $ 208� 09 i I 1 Of F -- 30 20 a..H. - - U ---- - - E fi .70 _ -202 a -- - I „ ° - -- - 05. 0 FF 204.20 204.20 2 3 / - 205:50 $ , 2 0�• I I r ti�h N �; 1 PE 203.7 ! �- PE 203.701 ( � P 5.00 a - I � 29 INN O.N j ` G�o \ 000 z:z Z l .t- 1 _y i.• � - H LL l.a. -_ r - yAJ \9 'WALL -_---.---- J 00 I FF _ N CNN k1l _�O o PE V I- - FF 203.70 _ 203.6 \, FF 204 I _ 203.90 I203.10 �� PE 204.3 PE 203.20 l PE 203. Q PE � � 17 ti FF211.90 { 2 4 °� oz ao p1'I F N 20 ti° \ Zp�2 20 937 �� v tiO `� - °!� �I �'� , � "--' .A � N J I I yo 1 A �```� o f I V o 6; 0 8 I I FF 04.10 F 2 r 1.9 201. A 203� ` �` � FF��,O -2� HP) E 203.60 0 o I o/Y �3.50 ; 3a ( � � P g o FF 202.90 ,� 1.5 \� -- 203.7 ti° o FF 212.10 0 PE -6'6.0 v 1 PE22.40 � � � �02 � ,Vw p J I 2 2015 FF 203.20 FF 203.60 0 I 202. Pr\ 1 I < 03 ��� VA A U a 1 -, V. PE 202.7 0; PE 20�.10 CONSTRUCT 18 R.C.P. STORM \ `�• r F °�' A 1 DRAIN. SEE SHT. 9 OF THE _ LO ``� N �ti�J? U26 \ �� ,ap '\�� �\ J ��� o ti°o�. 1 _ CO c4 �L- STREET IMPROVEMENT PLANS ���- �� �o °� v p Tw 207.4 �� '� 202./ \. ?02 ° FG 201.4 - - �- -----207 ---- 202 201 v w - -- _ - -=-TC c1e - TC 199.26 - _ --- OU25 -- --- TC 200,95 - - - N mi'FL�9733'g ter- _ -iur-- - -air -ni - - -- is- - 0�18-iii - - - -ia� -- - -iui- L-201-7*-- --- -- " - - - v�7e�su - 72'9D - 1362.00' 89°42'44 E irr- - - - - -ra -- ~-=-r _- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -i - = - -na- - - - -aim -- - - -r -- --rar- - A 42+00 13+ -� _ _ = 00 - - - 37+00 38+00 it / 39+00 00 41t -WATER- _ - - - - -- - -- - - -WATER- - - - -- ---WATER- -- - - - - - - -WATER- - - - - - - - - -WATER- - - - - - - -W A -WATER �Ci 196 CONSTRUCT CATCH BASIN. SEE f CONSTRUCT 18" R.C.P. SHEET 9 OF THE STREET GAR DEN WALL DRAIN. SEE SKIT. 9 OF THE IMPROVEMENT PLANS. CONSTRUCT EMERGENCY OVERFLOW DRAINAGE OUTLET 2 STREET IMPROVEMENT PLANS 1 IN WALL(SEE DETAIL "B" ON SH ET 0. PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECT SUPER SION OF ' DRAWING NO. REVISED PERIMETER WALL ELEVATIONS Z.-- - DESIGN BY APPROVED BY: ADDED NOTE Y' BENCHMARK NO. P.D. 9-2 ELEV. 180.71 KS CITY OF PALM DESERT SIGNATURE /c . �. �� 7(n�I -� �_� - LOCATION: TYPE A MONUMENT AT THE _ - SONATA R R.C.E. No. CENTERLINE INTERSECTION OF DRAWN BY CITY GINEER Mainiero, Smith and Associates, Inc. 44th AVENUE AND PORTOLA DIRECTOR Or PUBLIC WORKS GRADING PLAN SHEET 3Civil do Environmental Enginsar�ng�g�s� 0 AVENUE. RICHARD J. FOLKERS OF CHECK BY 7" 1" ronq as. w4, s..w sw R.C.E. 25320 �s�..a.. 0"poorn" asses-voea (a») sso-astt NO. REVISIONS APPROVED DATE ��� DATE: . A"r _ TRACT N0. 24254• POR. SEC. 8• T.SS.• R.sE- S.B.M.s.a.�. SHEETS.�- CADD DWG. FILE NAME: 26489-32 ALIGNMENT NAME: - k . IN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE TEN TA T/ VE TRA C T MAP NO. 24254 COUNTRY THE E. I/2, NW. I/4, SE. I/48 NW I/4, AND THE NE. I/4, SE. I/4, PALM NW. 114 AND THE NE. 114, SW. 114, NE 114, ALL IN SECTION 8, w DESERT TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 6 EAST., S.B.M. DECEMBER, 1988 LLj 20' �[ Q LANDSCAPE EASEMENT RAW R R/W R/W HOVLEY LANE R W 44 33' R W 60' 50, 33' -12 40' 2' J3 8' 32' f� MIN. � MIN. rL MIN. W Q 6 5' e� 12! 12- 8 6.5� 5� �- 6.5' 16' - 16' �I 6.5' I � J ) 8' I WALK Z SIDEWALK SIDEWALK O SIDE- ; I t EXISTING A.C. a 1 1/4" PER FOOT p 1 i PAVEMENT I/4 P R CURB c� A.C. PAVEMENT L' CURB 1/4 PER FS O I/4 PER FOOT CURB A.C. PAVEMENT CURB SLOPE �O I FOOT SLOPE � 5% v -¢1_5 % I 1.5°�� 5%� .a-SLOPE SLOPE 2 I 2% t_ 1 a BASE COURSE - FRED WAR/NG DRIVE -� VICINITY MAP � � � `j., �'" �'�-` BASE COURSE COMPACTED SUBGRADE CONSTRUCT 6" P.C.C. CONSTRUCT 3` A.C. SAW CUT 3 JOIN COMPACTED SUBGRADE N.T.S. CURB 4 GUTTER PVMT. OVER 6" EXISTING A.C. AGG. CL. 11 BASE TYPICAL INTERIOR STREET TYPICAL CUL - DE - SAC HOVLEY LANE IS- AIN rROPP / SECTION " A,' A " SECTION " B - B " A PIN 621 r 0 J r ; ro J� J J J J _/r 2'° - --I 210 J2 J J� JJ �1 I i i__.� _ i_ L _�.. L� 3 , ra i.. 20 1 5 2 205 1 8i 2 1 >, 32 t t I T 3 35 36 3 � 38 39 40 � 2 �.1cl0_- � � 0 9 - ' i �1 \ \ 2 0 .� 1 i SCALE: I'-60" I ..I rl \ 1 zi 18 3 3 0 ;�� ,c �w r i' - �� �� - _ F. 8,1264 .F. oo I i n \ z i 107 I 1v ' 3� i 8 2 81 ; 0 6 9 Y, 8 5 ,� LE VEL OPER �' H, 44f F. H, 44F, F u� In H. 44h '; �� H l,lt' i �� 1 ,ti t. �, �f 1 �. Oar 1 � o _ ___r- GARCON DEVELOPMENT m \S10 I I1SU SSU i ----- 2` i 106 J - i I 2 r/" I A0 1 68 713 PEREZ ROAD CATHEDRAL CITY, CA. 92234 1 _ 2 24 29 11 I I I 110 I I 1iu Lo 1 c i v I zoo I 3 I 4 I B B r I m Qq 1` I H, 114 F, H, ll F. I I I �_ ( !`±\ 5 47 � � H. 113 ". � i 8, 114�.F . � I I H 1_3 F- ^+ B,I116S.F. i ,9� -- io ' 1� ' � 110 - I i ��' I � 83 80 �I I I� 11 � 68 �I I� � g � ;U 56 � 6 , - � 11 ✓� �- 110 �F3, 14y._S.F_ - H, 0h4 F . I I H, 14 F - _ _ 8, 140 S.F. 8, 140 S.F. m I - I N I I N �- I rn ni I ���� 1 H. ]I 4 u `_�.F I 1 u:i 1 t / 1 I 107 m' I I 1 I m - isa I I 200 - 1 _T I I 2io I 1 1 O I Q I I v c I I Ir_� 110 I 110 i 11U OWNERS \41 n �I ` ^ �I �J 110 i �� 1 �1 \�I� r 28 �NES ""SAM" ALACANO AND KATFfLEEN ALACANO, 50, 140 S.F. ( 8, 1401 S.F. L gY140 -%<,-F; 8. 140 S.F. 2� N `rt I I \ll �' 1 C____J I a -7 Q �` "7 �1 a 5 5 _. � S.F. .O. BOX 22 4 7 8,1165 S.F. io I t �,,,\ 110 1 I I i4` `' / g i, I 7 / II "1 _._ _ e 064 S.F. /� B. 0�3 � F PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92261 11 ]S0 I !� n I B.illl s.F j� toe�� I I �'. I I s: 8, 111 S.F. + I 8. ] 1 S.F. 8, 111 S.F i 107 I I ( 8A107 S.F (o I. w I i o �° 108 a I I N I N 1 I 1 e 107 - I r I 1107 �' f 101 ZO r 14 1LJJJ 1 ; 2 6 2 7 I 1 I m 1071 I I�, 1 10� �, 1 < <� �� I , 1 , /� , ENG !NEER 8, 336 S.F. I 8, 336J S.F . 1 -- 8, 336 S.F. 8,;336 F. I r I '� "' I ' 5 /) `' `t I d I i �} I �, I I I �L1 - .F 5 78 3 61 ' kl��985 85 4�0 ,"'9 85 H5 �30' I g I m �n i 6 6 I i in B. 064 �8,1212 S.F. I -T--�� - [ M rn I I m I m MAINIERO, SMITH AND ASSOCIATES, INC. _ --p I r, I I ' I 8, 126 S.F`., 8, 096 F. a I 8,109E �.F 8. J-4F S.F. P 810U� �J ion i RANK OF PALM SPRINGS CENTRE SOB - �� / i 11 Ni 1 i I u I I � I I I M i ' , _j 112 777 EAST TAHOUI TZ WAY, SUITE 301 ___ - , _ v `� I s1 I . 1°3 i PALM SPRINGS, CA. 92PC2- 7066 o - �- �� 10 11, I 1 - I I \ J I J I I 91 „f I' \r ( 91 2 � .3'3 53 5 V I /� [� /� ! e, 25 F. I ��0 52 73 73 73 73 40i 16 _-36 �g d3 �`� I rl _ 8, 084 S.F. I G EI V E ,4 L NOTES 91 \r I I / j 2 I l B. 064 S.F. 86 77 I I 1 74__ R 5 1 162 �.___ 106 I PROPOSED LAND USE RESIDENTIAL I I I I I 8�312 S.F. 8, 134 S.F. I I I ~}' \ 8 134 S.F. PRESENT ZONING PR5 109 6 1 I f CO I �, 134 S.F. m 81 134\t.F. m 112_ I I GROSS A CREA GE 25 A CRES II I s I m o i o 1 I o 0 o a o s a� I r9 11 "i p`' 0 1 9 I Ise m 1 j i STREETS PUBL I /'� N g g 3 g g 1 g g g g 7 DS f - .� 0 �� , ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO._622-020-013,014,015, 1 � 1 N to I r+ 1'. � `, �] 1 s \� ti �., s Ql m� ra 6 cn S. 8, 030 S.I . 18, 030 8, 030 S.F. 8, 030 S.F. 8, 073 S.F. 1 , 055 F B, 800 F. / 6 1 7 � ' 6 4 6 3 1 �1 N 5 2 51 1 T 0/6d0I7 i I P.F.r IB ( PROPOSED I 11 I �� 8, 271 S.F. 8, 271 S.F I o j 8, 438 �F. ( 8, 426 S.F, I I SCHOOL DISTRICT DESERT SANDS UNIFIED LANDSCAP8, 597 S.F 8, 271 S.F. 8, 27 S.F. I r I i I 1 II I EASEMENTS 7 I �' l I I �� /--200 I �� \ e* 7 1 SCHOOL DISTRICT I 10 70 73 I 1 731 73 73 74 I 97 I 110 i 123 I 1 31 1 i 123 -- - iA 1 105 -^ I T L DEL L TE „�. TEL. - TEL. �, TEL. " TEL. cu - _ -v- 71` S.D. v - �� M - M - S.D.M.H. - I - - 994 - _�- -M S:D.M.H. ate.o - - S.D.M_H. - q63 - - - SDJAJ 1- - - IA ANDONED) (ABANDONED) HOVLEY LANE (ABANDONED) 12" W -o" W 6. ... 6" W 6" W ` W " W 6" W _ 12" W 12" W 12" w 12` 'A'n" 12" W 12" W 12" W CONVEYED TO RIV I CONVEYED TO RIV. T CONVEYED TO RIV. -T CONVEYED TO RIV �" ^ r' .-• ^ '•) CO. PER INST. 12822 r" .,' ^ ER �.' ^ �- J �► �- �- r- ('� �- �- ^� r,r- �) r, �- ...� J 2 2 J J2 J J 0�3 REC. JAN. 31, 1975 I J J 2 J J 0�de RECPJANI 3ST197523 1 O� � J% J 0338 I RECPJANI 31, 197524 6 ,-, z-, J 02 0 J � 2 E3 1 622 J v 2 v J v �{� RECPJANI 31. 197525 I J� �' J I � r I � r � � r 1 � 1- � � � PIN • � .JTILITIES ,, �-� �' ��l �-\P��l �� �-' ��l �--� r-' l �� >-'� 1 SEWER _ _.__ A H VA �- 0 f___, CO C ELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRI„ T WATER ----- COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT r-� F)J�� ELECTRIC SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON GAS ______ SOUTHERN CAL IFORNIA GAS Al RIGHT OF WAY NOT EXCEEDING 33 ' IN WIDTH FOR ROADWAY AND A EASEMENT FOR STORM DRAIN PURPOSES IN FAVOR OF CITY OF PALM ' 9 A RESERVATION TO THE UNITED STATES OF ALL URANIUM, THORIUM, TELEPHONE-- GENERAL TELEPHONE PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES AS SET OUT IN PATENT RECORDED DESERT PER INST. 172331 , RECORDED JULY 22 , 1986. OR ANY MATERIAL DETERMINED TO BE ESSENTIAL TO THE PRODUCTION TELEVISION___ PALMER CABLE VISION OCTOBER 21 , 1985 AS INST. NO. 235563 , O. R. OF FISSIONABLE MATERIALS, WITH THE RIGHT TO ENTER UPON, Q7 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF CITY OF PALM PROSPECT FOR, MINE AND REMOVE SAME, AS SET OUT IN PATENT Q2 RIGHT OF WAY NOT EXCEEDING 33 ' IN WIDTH FOR ROADWAY AND DESERT TO BE TERMINATED UPON EXPIRATION OF COMPLETION NOTICE RECORDED MARCH 27 , 1970 AS INST. NO. 28771 , O.R. PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES AS SET OUT IN PATENT RECORDED PERIOD 'PER INST. 234163 , RECORDED AUGUST 18 , 1988. DECEMBER 15 , 1971 AS INST. 142701 , O.R. SAID RESERVATION IS BLANKET IN NATURE. 8 A RIGHT OF WAY FOR DITCHES AND CANALS AND A RESERVATION TO A RIGHT OF WAY NOT EXCEEDING 33 ' IN WIDTH FOR ROADWAY AND THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR ALL COAL, OIL, GAS AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES AS SET OUT IN PATENT RECORDED APRIL OTHER MINERAL DEPOSITS WITH RIGHT TO PROSPECT FOR, MINE AND " 12 , 1966 AS INST. 37926. REMOVE SAME AS SET OUT IN THE FOLLOWING PATENTS: /4\ RIGHT OF WAY NOT EXCEEDING 33 ' IN WIDTH FOR ROADWAY AND 1 . INST. 235563, REC. 10/21/85 ; , �, aM ASSOC'ote PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES AS SET OUT IN PATENT RECORDED 2. INST. 142701 , REC. 12/15/71 �#' NOVEMBER 28 , 1958 AS INST. 86062. 3. INST. 37926 , REC. 4/12/66 Civil Environmental Engineering 4. INST. 86062 , REC. 11/28/58 - t 55 RIGHT .OF WAY NOT EXCEEDING 33 ' IN WIDTH FOR ROADWAY AND 5. INST. 28771 , REC. 3/27/70 :i y-F Bank of Palm Springs Centre PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES AS SET OUT IN PATENT RECORDED MARCH 777 East Tahgnitz Way, Suite 301 27 , 1970 AS INST. 28771 . SAID EASEMENT IS BLANKET IN NATURE. Palm. Springs, California 92262-7066 (619) 320-9811 my- '.. , ..:.., c> a .. a .. , + , 4'x W Lauver p w/1x4 Trim Tile Roofing , Brg. " 8-0 Stucco Stucco o Stu o . ,p a Fin.Fir. \ / U- ftE�evatoq SCALE: 1/6" = 1'-O" T z mow ° N Tile Roofi $ ge Stucco •� Fin.Fir. T v Rear O E�evation - A u � � Q Tile Roof Stucco Trim \ 12 W-V Bra. j f N N Louver w/1x4�r'�m 2Sx4 Tqrim Louver wl ry Tile Roofing ® Stucco 3a. a . Stucco Trim � t�J© F ` �g LJI a [inE�i F= Stucco Meta I Door i I DAM 1-1-T F=7 M F�U r0 M = � F=700 # . Fin.Fir. �Ft. ' 1 Meta DoorL Stucco trm R ght Elevation SCALE: US" 1'-0" Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0" � ,A, s , 9 N 1 S + } c . _ x x,F r , - - ,.. I . t ri 14" x 18'Louver - . , w/2x4 Trim Tile Roofing - 1 Brg. Q ° Stucco to Q r. �. Fin.Flr. Left Elevation - A �. 2) SOLE: 1/6" = V-0" CO M M> i � 'Q .ie w : Tile Roofing 5tuccc� .,' Fin.Fir. A,Rear t Elevatiognm, �- 'A (opt. 2 SCALE: 1/5" - 1' 0" » h Tile Roofing 5tucco Tr m 12 � 13'-0" � u Bra. u 14" x 15" Louver E w/2x4 Trim cd, • Tile Roofing o i 8—0' Stucco. Bra. Erg. O D O�C�U� ��0 i3r I DRAWN B1(' ga � ❑UUIU; �U' u4 �J stucco Metal Door FFF DATE- 1-1-91 _ i ODoo F= = �UODU . UU�DUUO Fin.Fir. --Vt Fir. LMetal Door Trim !Stucco +f+ [ Elevation% - Gar �. E lev►ati - 2) SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0 , Scale: 1/4 = I -0 ��� �1N ��, i a e 2 a n4 2. 20E3 m - n ,., _ x r 14" x 1$"Lower w/2x4 Trhn k Tile Roofing ® Stucco Fin.Fir. y Left , 89 E vati - SCALE: 1/6" = 1'-0" - ,fir W Z � CO ILU 1� N N Tile Roofing -.. ry , Erg. - Csidss Block d r � G� .Stucco .T, F< O Fin. Fir. _., D - Rear Elevato : t SCALE: va" - V-m" r~ J i i Tile Roofing I i i 12 i 18 sq. Louver w/ 2x4 Trim •^. �.�`. 14" x 18" Louver lSrg. 68� w/2x4 Trim W-0" Stucco Trim - Brg, Tile Roofing El❑❑❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑❑❑ ❑�__l 1 { 0 ❑❑ [� [� ❑❑ 0 ❑ ❑ ❑❑ ❑❑❑❑ ❑❑ i &g. 0�0 00000 � ❑ ,E,❑ &m" IL�IFIFI❑0❑� °° ❑ ❑❑ ❑❑❑ ❑❑: DRAWN BY-g, ❑ Q ❑ ❑❑ ❑❑❑❑ ,❑❑ , Stucco Metal Door [=7-7 , IUI F=__1 [=---7 ❑ ❑❑ ❑EJ(❑��❑❑ ❑'�i DATA 1-1-91 000 I�00�0 ° Fin.Fir. Fin Fir. A I * li Metal Door ht Froplaftit E Llavation 9B9 9B9 SCALE: 1/8" = 1�-0I# Scale: 1/4" P-O" PLAN RU 0 4 i 2wA1 A, sl o + , F. y 4 14'x V Lauver wnx4 Trim • , -- Tild Roofing 1 Brg. h h , stucco * r r Fin.Fir. 1:2' LL Left E vats . SCALE: 1/S" = 1'-0" co CC W Q N LUI NQ Tile Roofing r' . t i � tslaSS Block .�. &xr-o , W , pC. F r4j W Fin.Fir. 5 AW $ k Rear Elevation ® t. SCALE- 1/8" = 1 -0" d Tile Roofing IZ � v erg_ 14" x 18" Louver w/2x4 Trim erg. ❑❑❑❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ • Tile Roofing ��� ]EEll , F= 0�00©0 ❑❑ ❑ ❑❑ ❑❑❑ ❑❑� erg• stun ❑❑ ❑ ❑❑ ❑❑❑❑ ', ❑❑ ❑ ❑❑ ❑❑❑❑ ❑❑' �g ❑ ❑ DOE ❑❑❑ inn :� DRAwN ear: c, stucco t-etaf Door (� (—� ❑ ❑❑ ❑❑❑❑' ��!❑ DAM I-1-91 L I F l� I h1 (� (� r� — stwzo Trim F=1 00 0�0 00� ❑ Fe y Fin.Fir. Fin.Fir. Meta I Door 7B7 Oft t E�evation opts 2) Front E�evafion - a (opts SCALE: 1/6" = V-0" Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0" PLAN 9B' OP'T)ON 2 Irc N9 . 9!mwww a q 14" x V Louver w/2x4 Trim ® Tile Roo�firg I W-c" Brg. aStucco Fin.FM. Left Elevationk; - SCALE: 1/5" = 1'-0" �n Z _ �W UJ Q .o.. d w _ a n Tile Roof"N O Fin Fir. .r ...,. -r- ...-.r.., . -�.-....pv`*-y* ar-w a. ...,,C` {,..n. .....--C a,..;-.- ,,..a fi ,,. -+Y Y'.." a4 f > z a as . 1 Rear E$evafion VC1 SCALE: 1/8" = V-0" w , r W1 , Tile Roofing 12 Stucco Tree 1 14" x IS"Louver w/2x4 Trim Tile Roofing IS" sq. Louver wJ 2x4 Trim �r-7 Stucco � i Stucco Trim F= IF 11 F=--] ❑a i��I ;� �� � 1 j �' F �i f DRAWN BY• JH arg. I � r � I 'LJ, stucco 1 Lj Meta► Door1 71 F= F= i " ( DATES 1-1-91 I' I N ME a Fin Flr, Fin.=Y. Metal Door ` Stucco Trim ht Elevato Frop"l onel IC7 7C7 n E Leavation SCALE: 1/8" - 1'-0" Scale: 114" = V-0" fi fff PLAN 3 28A 6 l _ t _ r • y $, e r c , c �.T 14" x 18"Lower _a, +� -- w/2x4 Trim ® Tile Roofing . i Q � � Stucco .�k •, r• h. Fin.Fir. VC1, Left Elevation SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" Q • f :m W COUj 1 d g. _ N : Tile Roofing Cd w, t : Fin.FV. .— tit : } Rear E�evafioH _ SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" i Tile Roofing 5 12 �I 14" x 16" Lower w!?x4 Trap Tile Roofing Stucco Trim ri 5tw'CoE 70 F=-7 F=-]F=-] i i ( DRAWN BY' JN Stucco ❑ Meta Door F=— F=-7r 7� - - i DATE 1-1-9-T IFIEWSPOW i Fin.Fir. ~irt Fir. „ Metal Door L Stucco Trim Elevation Front Elevation M_g.ht- rp� SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0" >C> ' -- PLAN 2 = B _ 1 . REYItEaKE: tY I a t. Or Gj :� �• G . • • • - cc -44 CIO Jp T • r � L cc — ' � 4- i. Pill 7. ry L a R` . M O O . a. A • Ik, i pv - '' � }- ,4 . hn a s Y,t A y I •� PLANT LEG NIA LARGE SCALE TREES' 24" BOX TREES SUCH'AS BRAGHYCHITON.POPULNEUS BOTTLE TREE JACARANDA ACUTIFOLLA JACARANDA ' ItiS IANCEAi AFRICAN SUMAC EJERA PARVIFLORA G� AUSTRALIAN WILLOW Q PTTHECELLOBIUM FLE)UCAULE TEXAS EBONY QUERCUS VIRGINIANA SOUTHERN LIVE OAk BRAZILIAN PEPPER 1E 5Y I SMALL SCALE ACCENT TREE 24" BOX SUCH AS n iL CI 4MAEROPS HUN= MEDI RANEAN FAN PALM LACEPO TROEMIA TNDICA CRAPE MYRTLE ACACIA SMALLH SWEET ACACIA O 4 LARGE SCALE SHR • 5 GAL. SUCH AS CASSIA ART$MISIOIDES' FEATHERY CASSIA #-- 6 Q� LANzA:? A AUSTNG PLIA LAVENDER NQJHENBd� � N ERGHIA RIGENS DWARF MULLEE — W w XYLOSMA CONGESTUM SHINY XYLOSMA �- �# e • Lil SMALL SCALE SHRUB N w r �j 5 GAL. SUCH AS 1 v w t�i 0 DWIES VEGE'TA �; FORTNIGHT LILY Of ' HESPERALOE PARVIFL RA RED YUCCA ✓" IQ � z t NANDIlVA DOMESTICA HEAVENLY BAMBOO � � — � • R � . � RUELLIA SPECIES BLUE RUELLIA - .••. F . , . . �— �-- U = Q ? GROUND COVERSI U 1 GAL. SUCH AS WHO ,;* A6A REDOLENS PROSTRATE ACACIA O '•� Z _ B -CHARIS"CENTENNIAL" N.C.N. a- BOUGAINVILLEA N.C.N. .� LANTANA MONT. LANTANA { DRAWN, /9 TF PA YQFPAL w T CHECKED. OF SONATAJ%AM.LEG APPROVIED SY: DATE. C.C.FIES.No�, Z/91 ac.R�s No. •_ RECEIVED STAFF LEER l CALE_ •v BY // ,r ARC ACT"FORM 'u= 10 -0� APR 2 41997 cos. boos • UCTIOIV$HALL CONAWc ONE YEAR OF 7WI8 APPROVAL. w�THuu COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 91-m2 Z -- ... , CITY OF PALM DESERT !MEET If 1 ✓S - r - At y . D 10 20 ' 44�7 ' l o FI=Ti1 .., .. .. .* " r ,.+k:' .ya a _. "'_ er.••d-a ..':+.+e^,n,.vsti -., - , .-. .,: >a , ,. -.. ,an . . 3aas. . ._. ,.. .... o- .... ....., ,... ...>. -_,. .. :. a a a - a ! vt ( x, ct r 44 4 ;�5 CZ Ty, 13 I oL G • �` - R F5 >+ G U T I _ ✓ I V x PLANT LEGEND - LARGE SCALE TREES — _ � 24" BOX TREES SUCH AS } ^ BRACHYCHITON POP'LTLNEUS BOTTLE JACARANDA ACUTIFOLIA J JACARANDA , RHUS LANCEA AFRICAN SUMAC GEIJERA PARVIFLORA AUSTRALIAN WILLOW PTTHECELLOBIUM FLEXICAULE TEXAS EBONY QUERCUS VIRGI IANA SOUTHERN LIVE OAK SCHINUS TERBINTHIFOLIUS BRAZILIAN PEPPER SMALL SCALE ACCENT TREE 24" BOX SUCH AS CHAMAEROPS HUMILIS MEDT C 2RANEAN FAN PALM LACrERSTROEMIA INDICA :` CRAPE MYRTLE 4 ACACIA SMALLII SWEET ACACIA LARGE SCALE SHRUB 5 GAL. SUCH AS CASSIA ARTEMISIOIDES FEATHERY CASSIA LAVANDULA ANGUSITFOLIA LAVENDER MUHLENBERGHIA RIGENS DWARF MULLEE XYLOSMA CONGESTUM k SHINY XYLOSMA �4 SMALL SCALE SHRUB 5 GAL. SUCH AS �= `% DIETFS VEGETA .�. X . .FORTNIGHT LILY � p a' HESPERALOE PARVIFLORA RED YUCCA g NANDINA DOMESTICA HEAVENLY BAMBOO Lo F RUELLIA SPECIES BLUE RUELLIA �. GROUND COVERS � © 1 GAL. SUCH AS ACACIA REDOLENS PROSTRATE ACACIA BACCHARLS"CENTENNIAL" N.C.N. BOUGAINVILLEA N.C.N, , ' I..4I11�"AI1TR FONT. �i�,'3"�lA i SMATA.PLAMIM � Qa� aces. ;f . , 11M , V-=2 r a 1 s.. wr s - - t. --- BY a - ag o . 0 G A i �. W quo Lek # `' oto 1 �'• 9C�4 C4 Ty, AA �► � I - , ' ' '.. gip` � � . '• • • : � � r. . . . �, F5 PLANT LEGEND LARGE SCALE TREES _ 24" BOX TREES SUCH AS --� BRACHYCHTTON POPULNEUS BOTTLE TREE JACARANDA ACUTIFOLIA JACARANDA RHUS LANCER AFRICAN SUMAC GEIJERA PARVIFLORA AUSTRALIAN WILLOW sue- PTTHECELLOBIUM FLEMCAULE TEXAS EBONY l QUERCUS VIRGINIANA SOUTHERN LIVE OAK SCHINUS TERBINTHIFOLIUS BRAZILIAN PEPPER ' I u SMALL SCALE ACCENT TREE 24" BOX SUCH AS OPS HUMILLS MEDITERRANEAN FAN PALM LAGERSTROEMIA INDICA CRAPE MYRTLE --� ACACIA SMALLII SWEET ACACIA LARGE SCALE SHRUB 5 GAL. SUCH ASIL CASSIA ARTEN daSIOIDES FEATHERY CASSIA (1 LAVANI7ULA ANGUSTIFOLIA LAVENDER NfUHLENBERGI-EA RIGENS ;. DWARF MULLEE XYLOSMA CONGFSTUM w SHINY XYLOSMA q SMALL SCALE SHRUB a t 5 GAL. SUCH AS F- ``V� DIETES VEGETA FORTNIGHT LILY — HESPERALOE PARVIFLORA RED YUCCA NANDINA DOMESTTCA HEAVENLY BAMBOO RUELLIA SPECIES BLUE Rt1ELLIA �'y O I GROUND COVERS *. � Z © 1 GAL. SUCH AS p 4 f- �-- Q � w ACACIA REDOLENS PROSTRATE ACACIA 5 � BACCHARIS"CENTENNIAL" N.C.N. } BOUGAINVILLEA r N.C.N. LANTAI�IEi lt�fOi�'i'. LANTANA — �[ds O ye Owltl�r �. SMATAPLAW.LEG Oil iGiii. - _ QATW 5/1b/54T � �. Mo. • 'bI 0ZZ I ow ` 4i s