Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTT 24530 MONTECITO HOMES 1991 `y 'RECISE PLAN TENTATIVE TRACT 2Z'5ilIli, +Is �,;'Zq rl MANGE PARCEL MAP , s VARIANC EE —� C.U.P. —— —- REFER T0: APPLICANT: LOCATION : LOCATION - REQUEST. EXISTING ZONE: :Ce=S- I x PREPARATION PROGRESS , ! DATE BY COMMENTS KS ` 1 .1I�i APPLICA ,ON RECEIVED LEGAL PUBLICATION SENT NOTICES SENT _FIEL.D INVESTIGATION " ' DEPTS. NOTIFIED BUILDING ENGINI--ERING FIRE -- ✓ _ POLICE r RECREATION & PARKS _ SCHOOL DISTRICT DIVISION OF. HIGHWAYS a FLOOD CONTROL i i PRELIMINARY MEETING e-- i STAFF REPORT ! i FINAL PLAN APPROVAL PRECISE PLAN (6) LANDSCAPING PLAN (5) PLAN. DIRECTOR MOD. (6) HEARINGS & 'ACTIONS DATE ACTION VOTE - REVIEW BOARD HEARING I P.C. HEARING PUBLISHED P.C. PUBLIC HEARING APPLICANT NOTIFIED C.C. PUBLIC HEARING ORDINAN(:E NO. R:SO ON NO. E1:FECTIVE. DATE RECOROEDIFOR DATA- BANK 7_GNIN . �� P (CORRECTED . ,�' : .. ,. .. THOMAS F. LAGIER,P.E. DIRECTOR/OFFICE ENGINEER I 9�?be7?`Beiq,CWi11iam cTrbst 6.c54ssociate� CHARIYS HAVER Am)ASSOCIATFS DMSION f PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS,PLANNERS&SURVEYORS t 74410 HIGHWAY 1111 PALM 0ESEW.CALIF0RNR022W (6191 3a6-7a81•FAX(619)3464315 1�. i Carla Grant Acquisitions&SRles "oaron" REAL.ESTATE-INVFSTT1ENTS&UEVELIOPMENT 38801 CookStreet Palm Desert,California 92260 (619)779-9100 I Fax (619)779-9109 I rFEDERAL �SIGN 'a- - i Division Federal Sigre ry oretil Caon I PREsiti rt'S CLUB ART SALLEE 1997 Senior--Account Executive i ( (800)637-1026 (2091486-2900 760"'M"STREET- Home Phone(2091227-2006 FRESNO.CALIFORNIA 93721 -FAX(209)486-2618- I tt - oXv.wev,Rs rolsnnrnon BRUCE D.MAIZE 3 Bristol Court❑Rancho Mirage,CA 92270 760/770-7373 ff Fax 760/770-6633 ,�; ��, ., '� ,; :._„ =e , ^ 'y.�}l � - -� aA� �t *1�'fR_ �r� �A ` � �'� �`� ,I�'. �, z¢� � 1. �` � �, 4 � �C�v� � r r � � a ,5 �' �'�' � -, `�- ,. .n ,r `\ _ .� _�- -- F i I a 2y5� I I MONTECITO AT PALM DESERT DESIGN GUIDELINES I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I 38801 Cook Street, Palm Desert, CA 92260 (619) 779-9100 I I DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR MONTECITO AT PALM DESERT TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Design Guidelines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 II. Architectural Standards. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 - Architectural Styles, Size and Height. . . . . . . . 2 - Building Setbacks. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 - Wall Requirements. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 - Storage Areas and Utility Locations. . . . . . . . . . 3 - Residential Exterior Elevations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 - Materials/Colors. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 - Roofs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 - Chimneys. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 - Skylights. . . . . . 5 - Satellite Receivers. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 III. Design Approval Process. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Architectural and Landscape Committee. . . . . . . . 5 - Owner's Responsibility. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 - Design Application. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 - Preliminary Design Submittal. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 1. Site and Floor Plan. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 2 . Exterior Elevations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 3 . Roof Plan. . . . . 6 4. Grading and Drainage Plan. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 5. Preliminary Landscape Plan. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 6. Material Board. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 7 . Approval Procedure. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 a) Architectural & Landscape Inspection. . 8 b) Tree Maintenance. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 c) Sign Regulation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 IV. Construction Requirements. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 V. Site Maintenance. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 VI. Native and Introduced Plant List. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 MONTECITO AT PALM DESERT DESIGN GUIDELINES The construction and landscaping of a residence at Montecito shall be commenced within three years from the date escrow is closed and is required to be completed within eighteen months from the date commenced, or as provided in the terms and provisions of the Purchase Agreement. The following Architectural and Landscape Guidelines are to assist you and provide you with guidelines concerning the design, review and processing of your residence. The design, review and processing of each residence will be subject to direction and approval of the Architectural and Landscape Committee ("Architectural Committee") . The Design Guidelines are intended to enforce reasonable controls with regard to various aesthetic considerations for Montecito. These considerations are not meant to duplicate or supersede the functions normally provided by public agencies, but rather to coordinate and direct the design and construction of the custom lots with different architects, landscape architects, engineers, contractors and their owners so as to achieve a pattern of quality and outstanding character. The objectives of the Design Guidelines are to encourage and foster careful design so there is harmony between the homes, their sites, desert environment and overall Montecito image. Emphasis is placed on utilizing your property to its fullest potential within these Design Guidelines. To accomplish these objectives, the following considerations must be understood and accepted: (1) Guidelines for design and construction should be acknowledged for everyone's benefit; (2) A spirit of cooperation between the Architectural Committee and the owner; and (3) Guidelines cannot be all encompassing and consequently are meant to encourage, rather than restrict, creativity. Mont: 10/1/91 1 ARCHITECTURAL .STANDARDS Architectural Styles, Size and Height All home designs shall be single-story and shall conform with the Montecito style and theme such as Mediterranean, Spanish, Desert Contemporary and Santa Fe, similar and compatible to the model homes at Montecito. Other architecture will be reviewed on a case by case situation providing it conforms with the standards of Montecito. The minimum size for a residence is 2, 200 square feet of interior livable space. The maximum lot coverage, including both the livable area and garage is 35% of the total square footage of the lot. All lots have been graded to a finish grade elevation that was originally approved by the City of Palm Desert. Any alteration to this existing grading must be approved by the Architectural Committee and the City of Palm Desert. All heights of the completed residence are to be measured from the finished pad, and shall not exceed 18 feet. Selective areas within a house can be lowered or raised to create a more interesting floor plan. Also, pool and garden areas can be sunken to provide for privacy and design interest, but provisions for drainage must be addressed. Any alteration to the approved pad elevation are subject to the approval by the Architectural Committee and the City of Palm Desert. Building Setbacks Standard property setbacks are 20 feet front, 20 feet back, and 15 feet total side yard (minimum 7 on one side) . Corner lot side yard setbacks are 10 feet on the exterior side and 7 feet on the interior side. Roofed or trellised structures, i.e. gazebos must be set back 5 feet from the property line, 10 feet from the house and not more than 14 feet in height. Pools and spas may be set on the property line if they are engineered according to the requirements of the City. Roof overhangs and "architectural appendages" may encroach into the setbacks subject to Architectural Committee approval. Setbacks and conditions should be verified with the City of Palm Desert prior to preparation of any plans. No construction of any improvement, planter boxes, earth fill, or major (not easily removed) landscaping shall be done which would hinder the ability of the City of Palm Desert or appropriate governmental or utility agency from inspecting or repairing the underground line or lines which may be located in any easement area, side or front, and in particular, not within the area 7 feet back from the front curb of all lots, including both sides of corner lots. Mont: 10/1/91 2 Wall Requirements All walls require the approval of the Architectural Committee as to height, location, design, color, and material. All side and rear yard property line walls and footings should be centered and located directly on the property lines being developed. Top of footings must be placed below the lowest pad to either side of the wall and footings must not be visible above the finished pad. Height of the side yard walls is to be measured from the higher building pad elevation between two lots. Any elevation differential between pad will require construction of a retaining wall beneath the six foot property line wall. All property line walls must be masonry (masonry block minimum six inches to eight inches thick) and substantially similar or compatible with the color and finish of entry wall to Montecito. The walls may be in a color scheme which complements the home and which conforms to Montecito's desert color theme. Any other material must be submitted for approval from the Architectural Committee. The person who builds the first wall on a property line must paint the opposite side of the wall a neutral color approved by the Architectural Committee, unless the masonry block is a neutral earthtone color acceptable by the Committee. Any walls constructed in the front of any home cannot be higher than 4 feet within the 20 foot setback. Any variation will be on a case by case situation and must be approved prior to construction. An owner who constructs a residence on a lot will have to complete all applicable lot line walls if such residence is the first completed among adjacent lots. The property owner who originally constructs the property line wall is entitled to reimbursement as provided by the terms. and provisions of the CC&Rs. Storage Areas and Utility Locations . Storage areas are intended primarily for storage of trash, firewood, maintenance tools, etc. , and may be located in the side yard setback. Pool, air conditioning, irrigation and other mechanical equipment may be located in these storage areas, provided they do not present a noise problem to the adjoining residence. Six foot high masonry walls are required around the storage areas so that the interior of the storage area is not visible from the street or adjacent properties. Electric meters and panels, gas meters, sub-panels, telephone and television entrance service panels, etc. , must be out of Mont: 10/1/91 3 sight when viewed from the street or adjacent lots. They can be located in storage areas or on the house, or preferably in mechanical rooms. Access by the appropriate utility companies to the utility meters and equipment shall not be restricted. Residential Exterior Elevations The design element of a house shall be compatible with and complementary to each other and harmonious with the desert environment. Exterior treatments shall be similarly detailed around the entire house. All materials used on the house exterior should be compatible with and complementary to each other and to the overall design in style, texture, color, and character. All materials should relate to or be complementary to the desert environment. Materials/Colors: Due to climatic extremes, the use of wood on a residential exterior should be carefully considered. The use of wood on exterior walls as an accent element is encouraged because it adds "warmth" to any design, but it is a high maintenance item. The use of wood as the primary exterior material on a house is discouraged. Exterior building wall colors should harmonize with the desert environment and surrounding residences. No exterior materials shall have a high gloss or glare finish. Exterior hardscape colors should be complementary to exterior house colors. Roofs• Roofs shall maintain as low a profile as possible, and roofing materials shall be Spanish tile or similar material, and in colors which blend with adjacent natural surroundings. All roof materials for Santa Fe-style flat roofs shall not be visible. Any other material must be submitted for approval from the Architectural Committee. False mansards or other architectural element not an integral part of the design are not acceptable. Mechanical equipment shall not be visible on roof structure. Sheet metal work should be kept clean and simple with the minimum of exposed metal and generally should be painted to blend in with the surrounding materials. Chimneys• As fireplaces and chimneys are very dominant in architectural design, they need to be proportionate to and consistently detailed with the overall architectural design. Mont: 10/1/91 4 Skylights: Skylights must be integrally designed into the structure and should not be obtrusive. Satellite Receivers: Satellite Receivers shall be located in the rear yard and must be integrally designed into the structure or the landscaping. Every effort shall be used to minimize exposure to adjacent homes and they shall not be visible from common areas or the street. DESIGN APPROVAL PROCESS ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPE COMMITTEE ("Architectural Committee") The Architectural Committee established by the Montecito Homeowners Association at Palm Desert is responsible for reviewing and approving all Montecito site improvements and any revisions or alterations to those improvements. The goal of the Architectural Committee is to process each submittal fairly, consistently, in a timely manner and, most important, in accordance with the requirements of the Design Guidelines and Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R's) . The Architectural Committee, however, has the right to modify the Design Guidelines and also to waive any of the requirements on a case by case basis where, in the judgment of the Committee, the circumstances warrant a waiver or modification of the requirements. Please be aware that in regard to such a Committee waiver, or regarding any Committee decision in which discretion or best judgment is utilized, the decision of the Committee and any waiver or apparent precedent which results shall be applicable only to the particular issue and improvements which are the subject of the decision; under no circumstances shall such decision necessarily be applicable to a different improvement or property and other owners should not assume reliance on the decision. OWNER'S RESPONSIBILITY It is the owner's responsibility to make sure that his consultants (architect, landscape architect, etc. ) process through the Architectural Committee any exterior architectural and landscape construction or revisions. The owner is responsible for making sure his consultants and contractors construct its residence in conformance with approved plans and revisions. Mont: 10/1/91 5 DESIGN APPLICATION All drawing submittals and design review applications must be complete and in line with submittal requirements before the Architectural Committee will formally accept them for review. PRELIMINARY DESIGN SUBMITTAL The Preliminary Design submittal is meant to provide the owner and Committee with drawings that illustrate and communicate a design concept that is well integrated with the site and surroundings. The Committee will act on the Preliminary Design submittal within twenty days of submittal date. The Committee will need two sets of Preliminary Design drawings and one material board. After the Committee reviews and approves the Preliminary Design submittal, the Committee Chairman will sign two sets of drawings "APPROVED" and return one to the lot owner or his representative with a written notice of the Committee's approval. These drawings must be submitted to the City of Palm Desert for review and approval and should include the following information: North arrow, street names, submission date, date of revision, change or plan re-issue, vicinity map, legal description. Preliminary Design Drawings must include the following: 1. Site and Floor Plan (1/8 or 1/4 scale) : Easements; Pad elevation and grading plan; Building and pool setback lines; Roof overhang line; Slab elevations; All storage yards and equipment including trash area; All hardscape including material and color designations; Retaining or free-standing garden walls; garden gates and their finishes (include top of wall elevations) ; and, Square footage of the living space, the covered patio space and the garage and mechanical space. 2 . Exterior Elevations (1/8 or '1/4 scale) : All four exterior elevations; Proposed exterior materials and finishes on walls and roofs; Proposed special architectural elements such as skylights, solar panels and covered patios; Maximum height of finished structure from pad elevation; Typical fascia and soffit details, typical exterior column details if any and typical garden wall details; and The outline of all garden walls with dash lines as they impact the house elevation. 3 . Roof Plan (1/8 scale) : Flat and sloped roof areas and how they are drained; Trellis areas, skylights, mechanical equipment; and Location of exterior walls and columns in relationship to roof edge. 4 . Grading and Drainage Plan (1/8 scale) : All information from the Site and Floor Plan; The means of achieving positive Mont: 10/1/91 6 drainage from all locations on the lot to an approved drainage location, and Location of all area drains. It must be confirmed with the City of Palm Desert that pad elevations and lot drainage will be constructed and maintained pursuant to the drainage plan approved for Montecito, as applicable to the particular lot for which the approval is sought. In particular, there shall be no interference with the planned and/or established drainage pattern over any lots and/or the property unless an alternative provision for proper drainage is approved by the City of Palm Desert. 5. Preliminary Landscape Plan (1/8 scale) : The plan shall be developed on an accurate base drawing indicating floor plan and window location, site plan information and grading or drainage, as appropriate. Depict all areas of landscape development which may include: Front entry features, driveway design, wall/fencing, lighting, garden areas, shade structures, water features, patios, pool or spas and general landscape plantings. The plans should be prepared by a registered Landscape Architect, Architect, or other professional landscape specialist and be sensitive to the architecture of the residences and qualities of the site; maintaining and enhancing views, softening architectural elevations, reducing glare, providing shade and generally providing some green relief. The plan should illustrate the character, scale and relationships of the landscape components and insure that the design intent of the architecture is complimented and not lost. The designs shall be that of a high quality level, and generally equal to or greater than the model home examples. Illustrate proposed landscape, trees, shrubs, lawn, berming and groundcover areas. Identify trees by botanic and common name. In addition to street trees in front and front-side yards, provide at least two 24" box minimum deciduous or semi-deciduous trees and two 24" box minimum evergreen trees (larger sizes are heavily encouraged) . Provide shrubbery located adjacent to the residence (foundation plantings) and groundcover to soften exterior elevations. Water conserving plant material selections that project a lush green appearance are encouraged. Refer to attached plant list and coordinate with City for acceptable plant material at the time of installation. Shrub sizes shall be 5 gallon minimum with a maximum of 20% being no smaller than 1 gallon size. Landscapes shall be complete with an automatic irrigation system. 6. Material Board. Preliminary Design drawings should be accompanied by one 8-1/2" x 14" color board showing samples of the proposed finishes. Show materials, textures and colors of the building and garden walls, fascia, hardscape and roof. Actual material samples are required. Colors to be confined to neutral earth tones. Material Board will be retained by the association. Mont: 10/1/91 7 7. Approval Procedure: The Architectural Committee will act on all Working Drawings submissions within twenty days of submittal date. The Working Drawings format is left up to the design professional's discretion; however, the Committee does have certain requirements which should be included. They are as follows: a) ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPE INSPECTIONS During the duration of the construction phase, any number of informal inspections of the house and its surrounding improve- ments may be made by the Architectural Committee to ensure that the improvements being made conforms with the plans approved by the Committee. b) TREE MAINTENANCE All trees, shrubs and vegetation of any type within and at Montecito must be maintained so that the maximum height of said trees, shrubs or vegetation does not exceed 25 feet above street grade. It shall be the responsibility of each owner, for individual lots, and the Association for the common area, to maintain the trees, shrubs and vegetation in accordance with the 25 foot height limitation. This paragraph shall not apply to the decorative palm trees that the developer has presently installed or may install on each lot or in the common areas. c) SIGN REGULATION All signage within or at Montecito; except common area signage erected and/or maintained by the Association, shall in all respects conform to the sign requirements of the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions for the Homeowners Association at Palm Desert and the sign ordinance of the City of Palm Desert, whichever is more controlling. This paragraph shall apply to, but is not limited to, "For Sale" and construction signs erected by owners on individual lots. No signs or advertising shall be displayed to the public view other than on the individual lot owned by said lot owner, except signs used by the developer in connection with the development of the project. Mont: 10/1/91 8 CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS In accordance with the requirements of the City of Palm Desert, construction periods shall be limited to: October 1 through April 30 Mondays through Fridays: 7:00 a.m. to 5: 30 p.m. Saturdays: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. No activities Sundays or national holidays May 1 through September 30 Mondays through Fridays: 6 a.m. to 7 p.m. Saturdays: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. No activities Sundays or national holidays SITE MAINTENANCE The general contractor, job- superintendent, employees, subcontractors, and suppliers shall comply with the rules established for the maintenance and cleanliness of the site. The general contractor or job superintendent shall: 1. Maintain the site in a neat and clean condition, neatly stockpiling all materials delivered for or generated by the work and immediately remove any waste material or debris generated by the work. 2. All debris generated by employees, i.e, paper cans, bottles and litter shall be immediately removed from the job site. 3 . Remove all equipment, materials, supplies and temporary structures when any phase of the work is complete, leaving the area neat and clean. Equipment not in regular use must be removed from the job site. 4. Keep the streets, gutters and adjacent property clean and free of dirt, trash, debris or other material related to or caused by the work. Mont: 10/1/91 9 NATIVE AND INTRODUCED PLANT LIST TREES: Acacia smallii, (Sweet acacia) Brochychiton populneus, (Bottle tree) Callistemon viminalis, (Bottle brush) Cercidium microphyllum, (Foothill Palo verde) Chilopsis linearis, (Desert willow) Cupressus arizonica, (Arizona cypress) Jacaranda mimosifola, (Jacaranda) Lagerstroemia indica, (Crape myrtle) Parkinsonia aculeata, (Mexican Palo verde) Pinus canariensis, (Canary island pine) Pinus eldarica, (Mondell Pine) Pithecellobium fiexicaule, (Texas ebony) Pittosporum phillyraeoides, (Willow pittospurum) Prosopis alba, (Argentine mesquite) Rhus lancea, (African sumac) Schinus molle, (California pepper) Schinus terebinthefolius, (Brazilian pepper) Vauquelinia californica, (Arizona rosewood) SHRUBS: Agapanthus africanus, (Lily of the Nile) Bougainvillea 'La Jolla' , (Bougainvillea) Caesalpinea pulcherrima, (Red bird of paradise) Carissa species, (Natal plum) Euryops pectinatus, No common name Juniperus prostrata, (Prostrate Juniper) Juniperus sabina tamariscifolia, (Tam juniper) Juniperus "Seagreen" Lantana camara, (Common lantana) Leucophyllum frutescens 'cultivars' , (Texas ranger) Liriope muscari, (Big blue lily turf) Ophiopogon japonicus, (Mondo grass) Penisetum setaceum, (Fountain grass) Pittosporum tobira 'cultivars' , (Mock orange) Pyracantha species, (Fire thorn) Raphiolepis indica, (Indian hawthorne) Salvia Greggii, (Autum sage) Tecoma stans, (Yellow bells) Thevetia peruviana, (Yellow oleander) Xylosma congestum, No common name Mont: 10/1/91 10 PALMS: Beaucarnea recurvata, (Bottle palm) Brahea edulis, (Guadalupe palm) Chaemerops humilis, (Dwarf fan palm) Cocus plumosa, (Queen palm) Cycas revoluta, (Sago palm) Phoenix dactuilifera, (Date palm) Washingtonia filifera, (California fan palm) Washingtonia robusta, (Mexican fan palm) VINES• Bignonia violacea, (Violet trumpet vine) Bougainvillea species Ficus pumila, (Creeping fig) Gelsemium sempervirens, (Carolina jessamine) Lonicera japonica halliana, (Hall's honeysuckle) Tecomaria capensis, (Cape honeysuckle) Trachelospermum jasminoides, (Star jasmine) GROUND COVERS: Baccharis 'centennial' , (Cultivar of Baccharis sarothrodies) Cynodon dactylon, (Bermuda grass) Lantana montevidensis, (Purple trailing lantana) Lolium perenne, (Rye Grass) Myoporum parvifolium Oenothera berlandieri, (Mexican evening primrose) Rosmarinus O. prostratus, (Dwarf rosemary) Verbena peruviana, (Peruvian verbena) Mont: 10/1/91 11 i E I. REAL CIAYTiL/E� UNITED STATES TILE CO. �eoeiiFTiBX°sss' WORK 7R-R01 COON STREET + 9ALN OF SENT, CALIFORNIA P.O.BON 15D9■909 Railroad St.■Corona,Califomia 91720 ONNEER ofv44``OPEA: Sales: (714)272-359D■ Manufacturing: ) T'bbk-fOTb�IACtdp D[vn OPN[xi, LiO. !re: (714 737-0200 RICKARD J. NROTE 69-230 HWY. 111. SUITE 212 RANCHO MIRAGE, CA 92220 ROOF TILE (619) 528-9111 FAX (619) 028-9062 _ "MCIVIL fNG nEER: RILLRT-4L LLIAM FROST AND ASSOCIATI CHARLES HAVER AND ASSOCIATES DIVISION I 24-390 HWY. III - `•. _ PALM DESERT. CA 92260 9)(61 D4694N1 FAX (619) 046-8051 ............ . . . � •� `�..\ �+:' FN ING IONIXG• TILE TRIM `' �T[U �AUyS[ I;TRREEOT-liT5T0TIiTIAL UTILIv \ .,.: '. TTGFR�L C.V.N.D. WATER C.V,N.O. �¢_ jY� I $•.• CAl IC 50. GAS .._v . GAS CO. D ` �L ELECTR A' •" :,�"RW IFIEPHOM S0. CAL EOISON F G i.., -'ii,R• -. .t[r TELEVISION PALMERCAB ��`I,.� if DFTFQT-SANDS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT V60 OAK � Expo Stucco ANDRITE D Division W onc i nn4 Huru mrt mdrOTt Dislrihvtins Cornvony,Inv. 7465 Carroll Road 11300 S.W. 208 Drive •� Miomi, Florido 33189 um u0 San Diego C. A 92121 (305) 255-5880 TEXTURED STUCCO STAMPED CONCRETE ( MUM" MY ARCHITECT • .; GEORGE W. JEIKS A.LA. AND ASSOCIATES ARCHITFCTNNE 1N01ME[MMG P1.1WH6 `{ FILLZZ'.&["I[PRIETH SUITE,210.REARIR.U 9FY In n1q 1byN1{1 1702 RESOLUTION SETTING FORTH ITS FINDINGS AND APPROVING A TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBDIVIDING THE EXISTING 0.57 LOT "K" OF TRACT 24530-1 (MONTECITO) INTO TWO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS AND RECONFIGURING THE WESTERN ENDS OF COVINGTON DRIVE AND TAYLOR AVENUE. TOM NOBLE, Applicant. CASE NO. PM 28251 October 3, 1995 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 620-190-006 653-400-017 007,008,009,011 ,013,014,017 Morton B. Ulman THOMAS TAYLOR Post Office Box 2562 820 TROTTER CIR Palm Springs, CA 92263 LAS VEGAS NV 89107 CO. REQUESTING: 626-020-031 ROBERT BEIN, WILLIAM FROST Morry Desert Falls, Inc. 74390 HWY 111 C/O Best, Best & Krieger PALM DESERT CA 600 Tahquitz Way, Suite C Palm Springs, CA 92262 620-190-015 THOMAS TAYLOR 22931 CALLS AZORIN LAKE MISSION VIEJO CA 92692 620-190-016 JOHN MORTON 316 LA RAMBLA SAN CLEMENTE CA 92672 626-026=033,034 VILLAS AT DESERT PALMS 747 EUGENE RD PALM SPRINGS CA 92264 620-190-019,021 CITY OF PALM DESERT REDEV. 73510 FRED WARING DR PALM DESERT CA 92260 620-200-006 BEVERLY LAURENZANO 222 PORT ROYAL AVE FOSTER CITY CA 94404 620-200-030,046 HICHARD TAYLOR 3433 W. SHAW AVE STE 100 FRESNO CA 93711 653-400-019 SYLVIA WEISZ 1933 S. BROADWAY STE 251 LOS ANGELES CA 90007 Applicant: Baron's Financial Group 69-730 Highway 111 Suite 212 Rancho Mirage, Ca 92262 Applicant: Baron's Financial Group 69-730 wa Hig h 111 Y Suite 212 Rancho Mirage, Ca 92262 Engineer: Robert Bein William Frost/ Charles Haver Division 74-390 Highway 111 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Engineer: Robert Bein William Frost/ Charles Haver Division 74-390 Highway 111 Palm Desert, CA 92260 P November 18, 1991 i Mr. Steve Smith, Planner City of Palm Desert j 73510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 91160 RE: Lot 44, Tract 24530-1 Cherokee Homes Building Plan Dear Mr. Smith: The house layout plan for the subject lot was brought to us this week by Don Howard of Cherokee Homes. We 'are very pleased with the house itself, as its size, layout and architectural design will make it one of the most attractive houses in our tract and it is serving as one of our prime model homes. The house layout conforms with the front and side yard set-backs, but is slightly under the minimum rear yard criterion. Apparently Mr. Howard's engineer misjudged the depth of the easterly side of the lot when laying out the house. This is understandable, as the lot is irregularly ' shaped, and both its front and rear property lines are skewed to the northeast, because it fronts on an angular street (Covington Drive) . As a result of this miscalculation, 15 feet of the 65-foot-wide house lies within 12 feet of the rear lot line. Of the remaining 50 feet of house width, 20 feet is more than 25 feet from the rear line and 30 feet of the width is more than 50 feet from the rear property line. A mitigating factor in this reduced set-back is that Lot 51, to the rear of this Lot 44, has a 151-foot depth on this same east side. Although Lot 51 faces on a straight street (Taylor Avenue) , it is 13 feet longer on its east side (the side abutting the Cherokee short side) than on ,its west side and this corner of Lot 51 would tend to remain unused. I 38801 Cook Street, Palm Desert, CA 92260 (619) 779.9100 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 620-190-006 653-400-017 00'l,008,009,011 ,013,014,017 Morton B. Ulman •rtIOMAS TAILOR Post Office Box 2562 820 TROTTER CIR Palm Springs, CA 92263 LAS VEGAS NV 89107 CO. REQUESTING: 626-020-031 ROBERT BEIN, WILLIAM FROST Morry Desert Falls, Inc. 74390 NWY 111 C/O Best, Best & Krieger PALM DESERT CA 600 Tahquitz Way, Suite C Palm Springs, CA 92262 620-190-015 THOMAS TAYLOR 22931 CALLS AZORIN LAKE MISSION VIEJO CA 92692 620-190-016 i JOHN MORTON 316 LA RAMBLA SAN CLEMENTE CA 92672 626-020-033,034 VILLAS AT DESERT PALMS 747 EUGENE RD PALM SPRINGS CA 92264 620-190-019,021 CITY OF PALM DESERT REDEV. 73510 FRED WARING DR PALM DESERT CA 92260 620-200-006 BEVERLY LAURENZANO 222 PORT 110YAL AVE POSTER CITY CA 94404 620-200-030,046 RICNARD TAYLOR 3433 W. SHAW AVE STE 100 FRESNO CA 93711 653-400-019 SYLVIA WEISZ 1933 S. BROADWAY STE 251 LOS ANGELES CA 90007 oben Bei ,"WiIliamcFfost 0 Associates Cl-rsur r.S HAVFA2 AND ASSOCLA-TFS DIVISION PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS,PLANNERS d SURVEYORS LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL TO: GIT� OF ��l- zS,>L((ZT DATE RBF JOB NO. DESCRIPTION D"iS TK • 2453 five- tTtfi ATTN: S� \ WE ARE FORWARDING: ❑ BY MAIL BY MESSENGER ❑ BY BLUEPRINTER NO.OF COPIES DESCRIPTION STATUS: fSIGNATURE NT FOR YOUR: PLEASE NOTE: ❑ PRELIMINARY APPROVAL ❑ REVISIONS ❑ REVISED ❑ ADDITIONS ❑ APPROVED USE ❑ DELETIONS ❑ RELEASED FILE ❑ CORRECTIONS ❑ REVIEWED ❑ INFORMATION ❑ NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION REMARKS ROBERT REIN,WILLIAM FROST&ASSOCIATES BY COPIES TO: cprfcssio4aJ service since J944 74390 HIGHWAY to • PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 • (619(346.7481 • FAX(619(346-8315 OFFICES IN IRVINE.RANCHO CAUFORNIA AND SAN DIEGO 11/16/89 09,53 S 818 577 1340 WHITEHRWK PnRTNR 02 155 South El Mollno Avenue, Suite 100 Pasadena,California 91101 Tel. 616/792 7976 November 16 , 1989 the WHITEHAWK PARTNEKSHIP,INC. Baron' s Financial Group 69730 Highway 111 suite 212 Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 Attns Richard Krotz Rot Palm Desert II Tract 24530 Final Map Street Names Dear Dick, Jim asked me to send the following name selections to you. I am also faxing a copy of this letter to Tom Lagier at the engineer' s office. I£• you need anything else please let us know. Taylor Avenue Clair Lane Leigh Place Sonja Avenue Jonathan Drive Whitehawk Avenue Cynthia Place Lorraine Avenue Debra Drive Tami Place Roshawn Drive Kari Place Sincerely, Sonja Bartsch /smb CC. Tom Lagior 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE(619)346-0611 August 31, 1990 ARaUTECIURAL RE{ nm Oa441SSION ACTION CASE NO. : TT 24530-1 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): GEORGE JELKS, 7307 Birdie Street, Oceanside, CA 92056 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Final approval of entry design, fountain, sign, guard office, street lighting and landscape plan LOCATION: South and west of Frank Sinatra and Cook Street ZONE: PR-5 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Upon reviewing the submitted plans and presentations by staff and by the applicant, the architectural ccm mission granted final approval noting that the previous concerns had been addressed. Date of Action: August 28, 1990 Vote: Carried 5-0 (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen ( 15) days of the date of the decision. ) ----------------------------7---------------------------------------------- STAFF OJNPvIENTS: It is your responsibility to submit the plans approved by the architectural oc mission to the department of building and safety. CONTINUED CASES: In order to be placed on the next meetings agenda, new or revised plans must be submitted no later than 9:00 a.m. the Monday prior to the next meeting. 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA92260 TELEPHONE(619)346-0611 July 13, 1990 ARCHLTOCIURAL REVIEW CCNMLSSICN ACTICN CASE ND. TT 24530-1 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): GEORGE W. JELKS, 2307 Birdie Street, Oceanside, CA 92056 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of entry design, fountains, sign, guard office and landscape off Cook Street LOCATION: South end west of Frank Sinatra and Cook Street ZONE: PR-5 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Upon reviewing the submitted plans and presentations by staff and by the applicant, the architectural ccaudssion granted preliminary approval subject . to simplifying the plant pallet as discussed with applicant by Commissioner Connor. Date of Action: July 10, 1990 Vote: Carried 5-0 (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen ( 15) days of the date of the decision. ) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- STAFF COK=S: It is your responsibility to submit the plans approved by the architectural commission to the department of building and safety. CONTINUED CASES: In order to be placed on the next meetings agenda, new or revised plans must be submitted no later than 9:00 a.m. the Monday prior to the next meeting. ARCM TECTURAL REV EW Dept. of Planning and Community Development 73.510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 i Applicant (please pnntl 23a7 9//ZO/C Mailing Ada Tess Telephone ac-4 . lv , f4�G / ,-. .4 9 =7 State Zip_Coas REQUEST! (Describe specific nature of approval requested). PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. ' / 7 — �I —7 EXISTING ZONING 0 Property Owner Authorization The undersigned states Mat they are the owner(s) of the property described herein and hereby give author- Illation for the f Hnq of this application. Signature Date Agreement absolving the City of all liabilities relative to any deed restrictions. 1 00 BY MY SIGNATURE ON T14I9 AGREEMENT, Absolve the City of Palm Desert of all liabilities regarding any dead restrictions that may be applicable to the property described herein. Signature Date Applicants Signature Signature Date 6 (FOR STAFF USE ONLY) Environmental Status Accepted byt ❑ Ministerial Act E.A. No. a ❑ Categorical Exemption CASE �,nla ❑ Negative Declaration V"(Nc_/t5 0 0 O*w Reference Caw No. am*0eeee rY UMexe/Are 841-p J CPiY OF PALM DESM APPLIC ATIM FORM Architectural Review Of: Case No. I (Type of Pro) ) QCTC �. ,/ L G /L S (Applicant) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Agreanent of compliance to be signed by those applying for review. I hereby acknowledge that I have read and agree, to oorply with all the follcwirxg requirements, and understand that the Department of Building and Safety will not issue a building permit or allow occupancy on the use permitted until this signed acnfitnaticn has been received by the DeparbnPnt of Conmmity Development. The development of this project shall conform substantially to all development plans submitted in behalf of this case, and as revised according to the Architectural Review C nmission process. Any minor change requires approval by the Director of CaMtrity Development. Any substantial change requires approval by the Architectural camiissicn. All requirements of any law, ordinance, or regulation of the State, City and any other applicable government entity shall be complied with as part of the development process. This approval is applicable, subject .to the development of this project, commencing within one year from approval date and being prtanptly completed. Landscaping (with irrigation system) shall be installed prior to final inspection and receiving certificate of occupancy. Curb, gutter, cunt) cuts and tie-in paving shall be provided along the full frontage of the lot by means of installation prior to final inspection or other provisions as approved by the city engineer. Construction shall conform to city standards and all requirements of the city engineer. All new and existing electrical distribution lines, telephone, cable antenna television, and similar service wires or cables, which are adjacent to and provide service to the property being developed shall be installed underground as a part of development from the nearest existing pole not on the property being developed as required by mrdcipal code. �) (Date) /4 C�o� J oft peril 0 0 0 n 73-510 FRED WAKING DRIVE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA92260 TELEPHONE(619)346.0611 Pursuant to Title 14, Division 6, Article 7, Section 15083, of the California Administrative Code. NEGATIVE DECiARATION CASE NO.; TT 24530 APPLICANT/PROJECP SPONSOR: BARON'S FINANCIAL GROUP ' PROJECT DESCRIPTION/LOCATION: 277 single family lots south and west of Frank Sinatra Drive and Cook Street The Director of the Department of Community Development, City of Palm Desert, California has found that the described project will not have a significant effect on the environment. A copy of the Initial Study has been attached to document the reasons in support of this finding. Mitigation measures, if any, included in the project to avoid potentially significant effects, may also be found attached. RAMON A. DIAZ DATE DIRECTOR OF O0Mv9JNI DEVELOPMENT SRS/db i Dull Es PALM DESERT AR(HITFS,`MAL OOM II.SSION TUE.SOAY, JULY 10, 1990 I. The meeting was called to order at 12:20 p.m. Catmission Members Current Meeting Year to Date Present Absent Present Absent Ron Gregory, Chairman X 11 2 Rick Holden X 13 0 Russell McCrea X 12 1 Mary Drury X 8 5 Frank Urrutia R 11 2 Wayne Connor X 12 1 Others Present: Steve Smith Pat Bedrosian Brent Conley Donna Bitter It was moved by Comnissioner Holden, seconded by Camussicner Urrutia, to approve the minutes of the June 26, 1990 meeting as submitted. Carried 4- 0-2, Chairman Gregory and Camiissioner Drury abstaining. II. Moved by C mni ssi oner Drury, seconded by C nmi sci payer Holden, t0 approve the following cases by minute motion. Carried 6-0 (Char Gutty abstained on item #4). 1. CASE NO.: 1777 SA APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): SPEAKEASY ANTIQUES, 73-983 Highway 111, Palm Desert, CA 92260 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Painted plywood business identification sign LOCATICN: 73-983 Highway 111 2. CASE NO.: 1778 SA APPLICANT (ARID ADDRESS): SIGNAGE for AIDA GRAY, 73-690 El Paseo, Palm Desert, CA 92260 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Brushed gold letter business identification sign LOCATION: 73-690 El Paseo ZONE: C-1 MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION JULY 10, 1990 3. CASE NO.: PP 90-12 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): BILL WILSON, 70-500 Thunderbird Road, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval for 9,026 square foot design showroom building UXATION: Northeast corner of Boardwalk and Mediterranean 7.ONE: S.I. Preliminary approval granted by minute motion subject to the final drawings to include detailed landscaping and carport designs. 4. CASE NO.. 357 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): AHMANSON COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT CO., 3191 Temple Avenue #170, Pomona, CA 91769 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of concept plan for landscape/sidewalk hardscape LOCATION: Southwest corner El Paseo and San Pablo (commonly known as Sun Lodge Colony) ZONE• C-1 Conceptual approval granted by minute motion subject to the landscaping plans showing the sidewalk as temporary. Ca[mission to review the landscaping when the precise plan is submitted. The plan does not lock in a landscape theme for the future project. III. CASES: 1. CASE NO.: 1485 SA APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): PALMS TO PINES CANVAS for PACIFIC SPA AND BATH, Box 69, Pinyon Pines, Mountain Center, CA 92301 NATURE OF PRD7ECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Awning with signage LOCATION: 74-446 Highway 111 ZONE: C-1 Applicant, Ernie Brooks, presented drawings of the proposed new awning. Ccmmission's concern was the height of the awning and where 2 ''. MIIVbPES ARCHITE7CIURAL REVIEW CCM+IISSICN JULY 10, 1990 it would connect to the building. Mr. Brooks informed cc mu_ttee that the owner was extending the width of the store by 8 feet. Mr. Brooks added that the awning would be installed approximately 1' above the existing fascia. Comnissioner Urrutia felt the awning would be much more normal if it connected to the fascia. Commissioner Drury felt the blue that was being proposed would be too prominent for the 43' long awning. She asked Mr. Brooks if the owner would be willing to use a more subdue color of blue. Mr. Brooks stated that this is the actual color the owner was requesting. Mr. Brooks asked co miission if he could go to the actual location and get the measurements of the existing awning. He returned stating that the existing awning was 30" in height and the glass on the front of the building extended all the way up to the bottom of the fascia. He added that the existing awning was 7'6" from the sidewalk. It was moved by Commissioner Holden, seconded by Cartnissioner Urrutia to approve the awning with signage subject to the bottom of the awning starting at 8' with the top of the awning being tucked under the existing fascia. Maximum letter height to be 81'. Motion carried 5-0. 2. CASE ND.: 1781 SA APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): CONQUEST CHRISTIAN STORE, Post Office Box 862, Palm Desert, CA 92260 NATURE OF PRCJBCT/APPFDVAL SOLX21 ': Dark brown 1/2" plywood business identification sign LOCATICN: 73-985 1/2 Highway 111 ZONE: C-1 Applicants were present requesting approval of existing sign on east side of building. Mr. Bedrosian presented pictures showing the location of the existing signage. Commissioner Connor asked if the applicants could just move the sign down below the fascia to be consistent with the previously approved "Antique Mall" sign. Commissioner Drury commented that the Christian Book Store sign was up before the adjoining Arco station was demolished and that was the reason why the sign was located at it's existing height. Commissioner Holden informed applicant that if someone builds on the vacant lot next to this signage, they could feasibly build right up against the wall covering this sign. 3 + rmavrFs ARCHITECIURAL REVIEW OC1WNIWION JULY 10, 1990 It was moved by Commissioner Holden, seconded by CCRQmissioner McCrea, to approve the request to keep the existing signage subject to it being moved below the band on the building. Motion carried 5-0. Commissioner Holden instructed staff to have the Barber Shop apply for a permit for their existing signage, and having it moved down under the Christian Book Store sign. Commissioner Drury was concerned with how long it could take to have the Barber Shop cited for not applying for needed permits. She instructed staff that this process be expedited, as they have been given notice by the Code Enforcement Department to apply for their permit and they have ignored it. 3. CASE NO.. 1783 SA APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): SCOTT COOPER for COOPER TYPE & GRAPHIC, 74-300 Highway 111, Palm Desert, CA 92260 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUG r: Business identification sign IDMTICN• 74-300 Highway 111 ZONE: C-1 Applicant was present requesting his logo be used for his business sign. Commissioner Drury noted that the white background would have to be changed to an ivory color. Commissioner Urrutia would rather see the sign colors be the same as approved for Kwik Kopy (which is in the same building) or a completely different color. The applicant noted that the sign would be a painted plywood. It was moved by Commissioner Urrutia, seconded by Commissioner Holden, to approve the requested sign with the condition that the white background be changed to. an ivory color previously selected by commission for the three existing signs at this location. Staff to approve final color selection presented by applicant. Notion carried 5-0. 4. CASE NO.: TT 24530-1 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): GEORGE W. JELKS, 2307 Birdie Street, Oceanside, CA 92056 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT. Approval of entry design, fountains, sign, guard office and landscape off Cook Street IOMTICN: South end west of Frank Sinatra and Cook Street 4 MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW CCbWSSICN JULY 10, 1990 ZONE: PR-5 Steve Smith reported that this project was a single family subdivision west of Cook Street between Country Club and Frank Sinatra. Ctmnissicner Connor was concerned with the 11 different species of trees in such a small space stating that it would be too chaotic. He felt it would also create a real maintenance problem. He noted that there would be a much stronger impact on the street if 2 or 3 main species were used. The applicant noted that the fountain grass had been taken out of the plans. Commissioner issioner Drury asked about the type of roof tiles to be used. Applicant replied that they would be a gold barrel tile. He added that the color of the sign would be the same as the stucco with the green tile blending in. Chairman Gregory noted that the bougainvillea and shrubs proposed along the wall should be restudied, as these would not survive. It was moved by Omnissicner McCrea, seconded by Ccmaissioner Holden, to grant preliminary approval subject to simplifying the plant pallet as discussed with applicant by Co mtissioner Connor. Motion carried 5-0. 5. CASE NO.: 1784 SA APPLICANT (ADD ADDRESS): PATRICK & LINDA SCHRUBEN for FAST FRAME, 132 Mesa Drive, Camarillo, CA 93010 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Business identification sign LOCATION: 44-421 Town Center way, Suite A ZONE: PC-3 Staff withdrew this item from the agenda at the applicant's request. Commission voted unanimously to add the following case to the agenda: 6. CASE NO.: CUP 13-80 Amendment NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: DCMINICK MANCUSO'S TRATTORIA, 73- 250 El Paseo, Palm Desert, CA 92260 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Enclosure of present patio at northeast corner of building LOCATION: E1 Paseo and San Pablo 5 J - MIN[TPES ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW C[16MSSION JULy 10, 1990 Steve Smith informed canm ssion that this case would be going to the Planning Co mission for the parking lot redesign located at the northeast comer of the building. Ccmmissioner Urrutia asked about the imitation window on the plans. The applicant replied that it would be a painted imitation on the wall. Commissioner Urrutia was concerned with the roof line, stating that he did not feel it would work. It was moved by Crnmissioner Drury, seconded by Commissioner McCrea to approve the concept of the submitted patio ,enclosure subject to the additional trellis work as described to the applicant by Ccnmissimer Urrutia. Motion carried 5-0. IV. MISCELLANEOUS: Paul Shillcock presented the drawings and future plans for the office buildings to be built on the civic center site. Mr. Shillcock stated that staff was counting on the Architectural Review Ccmnissicnls oc mients on this project which has been approved by City Council. This will be a project which will service many purposes. The sheriff station is just about canplete, and is expected to be done by September. The new office building was designed to be used by other government agencies besides the city. These government agencies could all be housed in one building to create a one-stop situation for the residents of Palm Desert. This project will also be generating income to help offset the funds for the balance of the civic center. Mr. Shillcock noted that as far as the design guidelines, the city did not restrict the builders; however, they did say that the city hall is to be considered the major building on the site and whatever is built on this corner should not detract from the city offices. This building would include a conference room capable of seating 150 people for the use of the tenants and over-sized rest rooms with showers and dressing roans to be used by the people performing in the civic center amphitheater. The building will also provide more parking than what is required in the city ordinance. Ccmnissicner Drury asked, if needed, could outside government agencies rent office space. Mr. Shillcock stated that if space was available, it would go to non-profit agencies (i.e. Cancer Society, American Heart Association). If needed the city would let normal rent paying tenants occupy the space on a very short term basis. Mr. Bob Bonet, with The Brothers, explained the proposed elevations and landscaping plans. Mr. Bedrosian asked if there would be any shading for 6 i NIINLYMS ARCSIITEMURAL REVIEW CCN IISSICN JULy 10, 1990 the parking lot. Mr. Diaz said they will have to conform with the city's parking lot shade tree ordinances. Commissioner Holden indicated that the elevations show the city hall buildings are masonry structures, and this new building shows a combination of different plasters. He felt they should either use all slump stone or all stucco. The plans show the use of both. Commissioner Urrutia was disappointed with what was being presented architecturally. He felt this location was a major street in the city, especially being at the civic center, and thought the city would want projects that would enhance the architecture of the center. He felt there should be more emphasis on better architecture. Mr. Shillcock noted that the architecture had to be compatible with the existing city offices: Mr. Urrutia felt there are many design things the architect could do to make it compatible having the city hall structure stand out. Comiissicner Urrutia felt the design of the building was too repetitive and does not have a lot of interest that it should. It looked flat with the in and outs being too repetitive. He suggested some height variations and some in and outs. Commissioner Diary stated that she had to agree to some degree, feeling that the city hall was not the most architecturally eye appealing building to be built in the city and would hope that future buildings could be done better. Commissioner Urrutia stated that he was of the Architectural Review Committee when the city hall building was designed and it was this same type of situation. The building was designed, shown to the catmittee to take a look at, and that was it. Basically the commission didn't have anything to say about the end results. He felt it was unfortunate, as that is why the A.R.C. was formed. Commissioner Urrutia felt that the c mnission makes the architectural decisions for private enterprises and feels the city should do the same as they should be the roll models as examples of good architecture and landscaping since they are telling everyone else how to do it. Comnissioner Holden felt that the city should be able to plan this project telling the developer the mininnun they would expect him to do, and let him go from there. 03TUdssicner Urrutia felt that the city could spend the same amount of money designing something poorly as you can something well. With some ingenuity and innovativeness you can come up with a good design that costs as match or less. Ccmadssioner Urrutia felt that if you were to take away the window covers, it is basically a very flat building. Commissioner Holden noted that as the plans show now, this new building will not look like the rounded city 7 i _ rma�rrFs ARCfIIMMURAL REVIEW CCKUSSICN JULY 10, 1990 hall building on the corner. It is a projection that has a little bit of an arch to it. It is not a rectangular building like city hall. Chairman Gregory noted again that the pop outs are all mixed up with stucco and split face block. He did not feel this would flow very well. He also asked if water would be pumped from the lagoon for the landscaping. Mr. Bonet noted that yes, there was a well being pumped now for this lagoon. Commissioner Drury commented that she felt it was a great concept to accamndate the government agencies and non-profit agencies; however, just felt the council has already decided what they wanted and given that direction the architect. She felt that there would not be much of what was said considered by the council. Commissioner Urzutia felt that it was important that the council hear the comments from the commission and have then go from there. Commissioner Connor felt _there was not much in the way of landscaping around this building and noted that there are applicants that have to cone back to commission three and four times trying to get more landscaping around the building before the commission will approve the landscaping plans. Carthissioner Urrutia felt with this landscaping plan people will easily cane to the commission asking why they have to do a great landscaping plan when the city doesn't. IV. ADJOURNMENP: The meeting was adjourned at 2:20 p.m. TEVE SMITH- ASSOCIATE PLANNER SS/db 8 J Page Two S.Smith 11/18/91 We do not object to Cherokee Homes being allowed this minor deviation in the rear yard set-back. We appreciate the fact that Mr. Howard would have to go through a two-month process of re-design and financing re-approval, and we do not feel that this minor reduction in the rear set-back will have any negative effect on the surrounding property. It will be the only such set-back variation allowed by us, however, and we do hereby pledge that we will not again sponsor any such request. Sincerely, Cook/Covington Development, Ltd. by� Richard J. Krot , General tner F: ESTABLISHED IN 1918 AS A PUBLIC AGENCY �JSi RIOj COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT POST OFFICE BOX 1058•COACHELLA,CALIFORNIA 92236 •TELEPHONE(760)398-2651 DIRECTORS OFFICERS TELLIS CODEKAS, PRESIDENT THOMAS E.LEVY,GENERAL MANAGER-CHIEF ENGINEER RAYMOND R. RUMMONDS,VICE PRESIDENT October 26 1998 BERNARDINE SUTTON,SECRETARY , JOHN W. McFADDEN OWEN McC00K ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER DOROTHY M. NICHOLS REDWINE AND SHERRILL,ATTORNEYS THEODORE J. FISH File: 0126.1 RECEIVED NOV - 3 1998 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT City of Palm Desert CITY OF PALM DESERT Department of Community Development 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, California 92260 Gentlemen: Subject: Lot Merger, Tract 24530-1 This is in response to a letter form Tom Noble dated October 1 regarding the merger of lots H and L of Tract 24530-1. We have no objections to the proposed lot merger If you have any questions or require additional information please call Joe Cook, planning engineer, extension 292. Yours very truly, om Levy General Manager-Chief Engineer cc: Tom Noble Noble and Company 58 Lucerne Drive Palm Desert, California 92260 JEC:J1\eng\sw\0Ct\1otmerg TRUE CONSERVATION USE WATER WISELY r CITY OF PALM DESERT DEPARTMWr OF CU44NITY DEVELOPb2M STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Co Ttissio. DATE: July 5, 1989 CASE NO: TT 24530 REQUEST: Approval of a tentative tract map subdividing 90 acres of PR-5 zoned land located south and west of Frank Sinatra and Cook Streets into 277 single family lots having minimum lot sizes of 10,000 square feet and minimum widths of 80 feet. APPLICANT: Baron's Financial Group Bein/Frost 69-730 Highway 111, Suite 212 Charles Haver Division Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 74-390 Highway ill Palm Desert, CA 92260 I. BAC 93FOUN D: A. DESCRIPTION OF SITE: The site is an "L" shaped, vacant 90 acre property which slopes from northwest to southeast. B. ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE: North: R-1-M/Vacant South: PR-10/Vacant East: PR-3/Desert Falls West: R-1-M/Vacant C. ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: The site is zoned PR-5, five dwelling units per acre and the general plan designation is residential low density (3-5 dwelling units per acre). The zoning is consistent with the general plan. D. ZONE REQUIREMENTTS: The PR zone allows density to be determined based on gross acreage and hence a total of 450 units could be permitted (90 acres x 5 units/acre). The PR zone establishes basic requirements as follows: Code Requirements Proposed Perimeter setback 20' from public street 38' Max. building coverage 40% 37% STAFF REPORT TT 24530 JULY 5, 1989 Code Requirements Proposed Min. lot area As approved 10,000 sq. ft. Front, side rear yards As approved 20, 5, 20 Min. separation between single family detached units 10' 10' Max. building height 30' - two story 24' max. Private road street width 301 , 321 , 40' 36' & 42' In addition, section 25.24.190 permits camnission to impose such conditions it deems necessary to carry out the general purpose of the section. In other single family developments in the PR zone the city has applied the basic R-1 zone standards. This proposal varies from the R-1 standards in that one third of the units will be 2 story (minimum 200 feet from public streets) 24 feet in height, side yards will be reduced to 5 feet, coverage proposed at 37% whereas 30% is typical for lots in excess of 10,000 square feet. II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LAYOUT: The proposal is to create 277 single family lots having minimum lot areas of 10,000 square feet (for an overall density of 3.07 lots per acre). The average lot size will be 11,350 square feet. The development has one access point onto Cook Street and one onto Frank Sinatra Drive. This will be a walled, gated development with privately owned and maintained streets. The main streets in the project will be 42 feet with curb to curb and the lower use streets 36 feet curb to curb. The applicant indicates that the homes will range from 1850 to 3000 square feet plus two and three car garages. One third of the units will be 2 story (24 feet maximum). These two story units will be at least 200 feet from either public street and, in addition, the second stories will be stepped back from the first floor front wall in order to reduce the mass when viewed from the street. III. AREAS OF CONCERN: A. TWO STORY HOMES: This development will be the first two-story single family subdivision in the city. The applicant indicates that there will be no two story units within 200 feet of a public street. Commission may wish to prohibit two story units on any lot which is adjacent to 2 i STAFF REPORT TT 245W JULY 5, 1989 the perimeter of the property. While the properties on all sides are zoned PR and could request two story approval, two story developments are the exception and not the rule and, of course, the city could condition those developments similarly. B. SIDE YARD SETBACKS: The zone requirement is for 10 feet of separation between buildings. The applicant is proposing 10 feet of separation (5 feet on each lot). This minimal amount of distance is of concern to staff because it is only 50% of what is required in the basic R-1 10,000 zone (i.e. : 20 feet total, minimum of 8 feet) and it must be kept in mind that the R-1 zone limits hones to single story. Staff cannot support two- story (24' high) homes with 5 foot side yard setbacks. C. PROPOSED COVERAGE: The applicant is proposing up to 37% lot coverage. The R-1, 10,000 zone limit is 30%. If we increase the side yards to total 20 feet, as reccomended in B above, then the 300s. coverage limit would likely be the maximum attainable (i.e. : 10,000 square foot lot would allow 3000 square feet of covered area) (average lot area is 11,350 square feet would permit 3405 square feet of coverage). Therefore, by placing the 3000 square foot hones on the larger lots, the 30% lot coverage limit should not be a problem. D. LOT 5 AND 218 "PARK AND RETENTION": Lot 218 is a 65,900 square foot parcel labeled "Park and Retention". Lot 5 is 35,100 square feet and labeled "Landscape and Retention". Just for the clarification of the applicant the city is not interested nor will it accept the dedication of either of these sites for a city park or retention basin nor will either be credited toward this map's required park fees. IV. ANALYSIS• A. FINDINGS NEEDED FOR APPROVAL OF THE TENTATIVE TRACT MAP: 1. That the proposed map is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. 3 STAFF REPORT TT 24530 JMY 5, 1989 Justification: The proposed map is consistent with the zoning and the zoning is consistent with the general plan. Compliance with the conditions and mitigation measures will assure consistency with the general plan. 2. That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. Justification: All public streets will be dedicated and improved and sufficient drainage facilities will be provided in conformance with the general plan guidelines and city ordinances. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the type of development. Justification: The 90 acre site is of sufficient size to accommodate the proposed project and the topography of the site does not create significant problems. 4. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development. Justification: The design of the project indicates that the site is suitable for the proposed density of development because the site can be served by respective utilities and, as conditioned, to provide full traffic circulation and is designed in compliance with all city codes. 5. The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. Justification: The design will not cause substantial environmental damage or injure fish or wildlife or their habitat because it will be constructed in compliance with applicable regulations and the proposed negative declaration has determined that there will be no related adverse environmental effect which cannot be mitigated. 4 . STAFF REPORT TT 24530 JULY 5, 1989 6. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems. Justification: The design will not cause serious public health problems because it will be in compliance with applicable health, safety and building codes. 7. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. Justification: There are no easements acquired by the public at large for access or use of property within the proposed subdivision. The map has been designed to share a street access from Frank Sinatra with the property to the west. 8. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not restrict solar access to the property. Justification: The project has been designed to conform to code requirements and will not impact solar access to adjacent properties and will provide adequate solar access to this property. V. ENVIF40NM MAL REVIEW: The director of ccnmu uty development has determined that the proposed project will not have a significant effect on the environment and a negative declaration of environmental impact has been prepared. VI. REOCDTENIDATICN: A. Adoption of the findings. B. Adoption of Planning Carmiission Resolution No. approving TT 24530, subject to conditions. VII. ATTACHMENTS: A. Draft resolution. B. Legal notice. 5 STAFF REPORT TT 24530 JULY 5, 1989 C. Negative declaration. D. Plans and exhibits. Prepared by Reviewed and Approved by /trn 6 1 i =a ` MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING TUESDAY - OCTOBER 5, 1993 7 :00 P.M. - CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBER 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE I . CALL TO ORDER Chairman Spiegel called the meeting to order at 7 : 00 p.m. II . PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Commissioner Whitlock led in the pledge of allegiance. III . ROLL CALL Members Present: Bob Spiegel, Chairman Paul Beaty Diane Cox Sabby Jonathan Carol Whitlock Members Absent: None Staff Present: Ray Diaz Paul Shillcock Bob Hargreaves Tonya Monroe Joe Gaugush IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Consideration of the September 21, 1993 meeting minutes . Action: Moved by Commissioner Cox, seconded by Commissioner Whitlock, approving the September 21, 1993 meeting minutes as submitted. Carried 5-0 . V. SUMMARY OF COUNCIL ACTION: Mr. Diaz summarized pertinent September 23, 1993 council action. VI . CONSENT CALENDAR BCase No. TT 24530 KEVIN McHUGH JR. FOR BARON'S \� FINANCIAL GROUP, Applicant Request for approval of a one year time extension for a tentative tract map subdividing 90 acres into 277 single family lots located south and west of Frank Sinatra Drive and Cook Street. Commissioner Jonathan noted that initial approval was granted in July of 1989 . He asked for clarification on the 36 month rule and the final map recordation. He asked if it was normal for a map to come before the planning commission for a first time extension when it was already four years old. Mr. Diaz replied that it was .not normal and indicated that the Governor approved legislation requiring an additional two year extension on a map. Commissioner Whitlock asked Mr. Gaugush to explain his letter of 1992 . Mr. Gaugush stated that the requestor took the position that he needed to keep the tract active by virtue of extensions . In reality, the provisions of the map act that kicked in place by phasing and recording of previous final maps under the phased map created extensions automatically. The applicant' s engineer was establishing a comfort level to assure that they . have an active map. Mr. Gaugush explained that there were specific guidelines that provide time lines for the maps themselves, versus a project approval . Action: Moved by Commissioner Whitlock, seconded by Commissioner Cox, adopting the consent calendar by minute motion. Carried 5-0 . VIII . MISCELLANEOUS Chairman Spiegel suggested consideration of the Miscellaneous Items before the public hearing section. Commission concurred. It was moved by Commissioner Whitlock, seconded by Commissioner Cox, to suspend the agenda item order and consider the Miscellaneous items first. Motion carried 5-0. A. Case No. CUP 93-3 Section 4 - RONALD ODEKIRK, Applicant Request for adoption of a resolution approving a conditional use permit to construct and operate a 20 acre multi- use, pay for play, recreation facility to be located on 20 acres of City of Palm Desert owned land zoned R-1-M located 800 feet south of Frank Sinatra Drive on Portola Avenue. Mr. Diaz stated that the applicants requested a clarification of the condition regarding video games . As far as the minutes were concerned they are not verbatim minutes and were not a transcript. This issue came up during the hearing and while there was no formal vote on the issue of video machines, one of the persons objecting to the use spoke on that issue and he indicated that staff could place a condition prohibiting video machines . That was the condition before the commission. The commission could vote on that issue separately; there was discussion on that issue and one member of the commission did indicate that he had no objection to the video machines . The reason the condition J CRY ®f Palm 083(9F 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260-2578 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 FAX (619) 340-0574 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NOTICE OF ACTION Date: October 6 , 1993 Mr. Kevin McHugh, Jr. Robert Bein, William Frost & Associates 74-410 Highway 111 Palm Desert, California 92260 Re: TT 24530 The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of October 5 , 1993 . PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVED A ONE YEAR TIME EXTENSION FOR TT 24530 BY MINUTE MOTION. CARRIED 5-0 . Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Community Development, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen ( 15 ) days of the date of the cision. d• RAM N A. DIAZ , S C ARY PALM DESERT PLANNI COMMISSION RAD/tm cc: Coachella Valley Water District Public Works Department Building & Safety Department Fire Marshal �obett "Beuj,William cHo- st 6&c,9ssociates PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS, PLANNERS & SURVEYORS RECEIVED September 16, 1993 SEP 17 1993 JN 301196 COMMON"OEVfLOPMEW DEPARTMENT CNV OF PALM V[SfRI Mr. Ray Diaz CITY OF PALM DESERT 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, California 92260 Subject: Tentative Tract Map No. 24530 Extension of Time Dear Mr. Diaz: Pursuant to Section 66452.6 of the Subdivision Map Act, Robert Bein, William Frost & Associates (RBF) hereby request on behalf of Baron's Financial Group and Hillcrest of Palm Desert that the Tentative Tract Map No. 24530 be extended for a period of one year. The above referenced citation provides for the extension of a tentative map of 36 months with the recordation of each phased final map. The final map, Tract No. 24530-2, is currently being processed with the City of Palm Desert and has been placed on the agenda for the September 23, 1993 City Council Meeting by Mr. Joe Gaugush. If I may be of any assistance on this matter, please don't hesitate to call me at 346-7481. S' cerely, j V evin D. McHugh, r., S. Senior Director, Surveying/Mapping xc: Mr. Richard Krotz Mr. Michael Burnett KDM:11\wmsp\11960916.kdm `Prgfessiortal service since 1944 74-410 HIGHWAY 111 • PALM DESERT, CALI FOR N IA 92260-4141 • (619) 346-7481 • FAX(619) 346-8315 OFFICES IN IRVINE • DENVER • SACRAMENTO • SAN DIEGO • TEMECULA a `3. CRY oV FMM M30(an 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260-2578 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 FAX (619) 340.0574 June 21 , 1993 Mr . Robert G. Ross , P . E . , Director of Engineering ROBERT BEIN, WILLIAM FROST & ASSOCIATES 74-410 Highway Ill Palm Desert, California 92260-4114 Subject : Tract 24530-2 Street Name Request Dear Bob: Pursuant to your letter of June 17 , 1993 , we have reviewed the street names suggested. The following street names would be acceptable to the city at this time : Brookhurst, Chapman, Fairlane, Fairmont, Huntington, Lucerne, Lynwood, Merill , Overland, Westminster I trust this is the information which you require. If you have any questions , please do not hesitate to call . Sincerely, STEPHEN SMITH ASSOCIATE PLANNER SS/db `Xbbe.rt 'Beiij,`William 'FRost 6&C,9ssociates PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS, PLANNERS & SURVEYORS June 17, 1993 JN 301196 Mr. Steve Smith Planning Department CITY OF PALM DESERT 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, California 92260 Subject: Tract 24530-2 Street Name Request Dear Steve: Robert Bein, William Frost & Associates hereby requests approval of street names for Phase Two of the Montecito Project,Tract No. 24530located on Cook Street within the City of Palm Desert. I have attached a list of street names acceptable to the developer and a copy of the street layout. I believe three street names are needed for this phase. Thank you for your assistance. Please call me at (619) 346-7481 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Robert G. Ross, P.E., Director of Engineering Attachments cc: Richard Krotz RG R:II\comsp\11960617.rgr `Prgessiortal service sirLcc 1944 74-410 HIGHWAY 111 • PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260-4114 • (619) 346-7481 • FAX(619) 346-8315 OFFICES IN IRVINE • CORONA • SACRAMENTO • SAN DIEGO • TEMECULA JUN-03-1993 09�49 FROM R—on's Financial Group TO 3468315 P.02 f !g MEMO: Richard Krotz to Robert Ross Date: Thursday - June 31 1993 Subiect: Street Names for Montecito - Phase II Dear Bob: Any three of the following names would be acceptable to us for the streets in Phase Two: Brookhk.t Chapman ✓ Fairlane Fairmont, ✓ Huntington Lucerne Lynwood Merill✓ -Mission• Overland ✓ ,Palomar < among- Sierra, " enoia Westminister If the city cannot use at least three of these; please let me know. Richard Rrotz 38801 Cook Street, Palm Desert, CA. 92260 (619) 779M00 ...��i... ............ .... 13 14 16 V 1819 20 r STREET 'C' 21 38 . 6 37 10 22 i .• W .. 39 30 . 9 2�' 23 32 J 24 ' ham' �� � •�. 3141 '••� SFr �Q 28 '•••. 7 g 25 . : 42 26 ''• • 4 27 ..,• 3 2 ; . � .............. .. .. ... ..EET . !I D8X AAA rr" SCALE 1" = loos FRANK COVINGTON S/NAfRA OR. DRIVE L EGE . ctn� nvz 17 EEl ED MAY 2 2 1992 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 cOmmu"crlDE E BPMENTDEPPARTMENT TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 May 22, 1992 Mr. Richard Krotz BARON'S FINANCIAL GROUP 1401 Sagebrush Palm Springs, CA 92264 SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION/TENTATIVE MAP EXPIRATION - TENTATIVE TRACT 24530 Dear Mr. Krotz: The purpose of this letter is to clarify the status of Tentative Tract 24530 as related to expiration date and time extension requirements. As you know, the tentative map received Planning Commission approval on July 5, 1989, with art initial life of two years; however, Government Code Section 66452.6 (A) provides that in the case of phased final maps where a subdivider is required to expend one hundred twenty-five thousand dollars ($125,000) or more to construct, improve, or finance the construction or improvement of public improvements outside the property boundaries of the tentative map, the filing of a final map shall extend the expiration of the approved tentative map by 36 months from the date of expiration or the date of the previously filed final map, whichever is later, to a maximum of ten years from the original date of approval . In the case of Tentative Tract 24530, the conditions of approval require the payment of drainage fees for the construction of master plan drainage facilities. Based on the current fee structure, which is the same as existed at the time of the tentative map approval , the drainage fee would be approximately $364,800.00 (91 .2 acres x $4,000/acre) . It is our opinion that this fee, which is intended to finance the construction of public improvements (drainage facilities) outside the tentative map boundaries meets the requirements of Section 66452.6 (A) with respect to the life of the tentative map. As a result of the recordation of the first phase final map (Tract 24530-1 ) on September 18, 1990, the expiration date of the tentative map was extended For 36 months to September 18, 1993. The recordation of additional final maps on the property will extend the expiration date by the same 36-month period to a maximum of ten years; therefore, the ultimate expiration date of the tentative map would be August 5, 1999. 4 Mr . Richard Krotz Page 2 May 22, 1992 TIME EXTENSION/TENTATIVE MAP EXPIRATION TT 24530 1 hope the foregoing explanation has served to clarify the matter of time extensions and map expirations for Tentative Tract 24530, and we look forward to processing the next phase of development in the near future. Sincerely, OSEPH S. GAUGUSH, P.E. SENIOR ENGINEER JSG/ms cc: Richard J. Folkers, Asst. City Manager/Public Works Director k,,.R'ay Diaz, Asst. City Manager/Community Development Director R. Page Garner, Engineering Technician Robert Ross, RBF & Associates Larry Jones, RBF & Associates CITY OF PALM DESERT �t REAL ES'I'AI'E INVES'I'MF,NI S & DEVELOPMEN'I' 31 LINCOLN PLACE • RANCHO MIRAGE, CA 92270 (619) 328-9111 Facsimile: (619) 328-9367 �V April 10, 1992 qP���/�� R COMMt"Viryo Mr. Ray Diaz, Community Development Director pryOFpa>ME„, City of Palm Desert "DSfR,^"+r� 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 Subject: Tentative Tract Map No. 24530 Dear Mr. Diaz: The first phase of Tract 24530, containing 52 lots, has been recorded and all of its physical improvements have been completed. There are two homes nearing completion and several more scheduled to begin construction within the next ninety days. The phasing plan, which was submitted and reviewed by the City, set forth five phases for the 280-lot project. We are now ready to proceed with the processing of the 41-lot second phase of the development. In contacting your office we have learned that the original approval date of the Tentative Map was July 5, 1989. It is our hope that the work completed to date is sufficient evidence to permit the project phases to proceed to develop under the original Conditions of Approval, and do hereby request that a one-year extension of the Tentative Map be granted. Sincerely, Richard J. Krotz, eneral Partner Cook/Covington Development, Ltd. 38801 Cook Street Palm Desert, CA 92270 Tel: (619) 328-9111 I y, RECEIVED NOV 15 1991 November 14, 1991 IbMMunClp.....MENT DElAEIMfN1 Mr. Steve Smith Planning Department CITY OF PALM DESERT 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert , CA 92260 Dear Steve: As we discussed today, this will confirm my understanding that the maximum lot coverage for Montecito, including both the livable area and garage, is 35% of the total footage of the lot . The 35% coverage is referenced in the Design Guidelines you and I reviewed in September and I am enclosing another copy of the Guidelines for your convenience . Thank you for all of your help. Sincerely, Carla Grant CG: jss Enclosure 38801 Cook Street, Palm Desert, CA 92260 (619) 779.9100 a S REPS ED NOV 15 1991 COMMDNLTV DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF PALM DESERT MONTECITO AT PALM DESERT DESIGN GUIDELINES 38801 Cook Street, Palm Desert, CA 92260 (619) 779-9100 DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR MONTECITO AT PALM DESERT TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Design Guidelines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 II. Architectural Standards. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 - Architectural Styles, Size and Height. . . . . . . . 2 - Building Setbacks. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 - Wall Requirements. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 - Storage Areas and Utility Locations. . . . . . . . . . 3 - Residential Exterior Elevations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 - Materials/Colors. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 - Roofs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 - Chimneys. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 - Skylights. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 - Satellite Receivers. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 III. Design Approval Process. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 - Architectural and Landscape Committee. . . . . . . . 5 - Owner's Responsibility. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 - Design Application. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 - Preliminary Design Submittal. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 1. Site and Floor Plan. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 2 . Exterior Elevations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 3 . Roof Plan. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 4 . Grading and Drainage Plan. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 5. Preliminary Landscape Plan. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 6. Material Board. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 7. Approval Procedure. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 a) Architectural & Landscape Inspection. . 8 b) Tree Maintenance. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 c) Sign Regulation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 IV. Construction Requirements. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 V. Site Maintenance. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 VI. Native and Introduced Plant List. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 MONTECITO AT PALM DESERT DESIGN GUIDELINES The construction and landscaping of a residence at Montecito shall be commenced within three years from the date escrow is closed and is required to be completed within eighteen months from the date commenced, or as provided in the terms and provisions of the Purchase Agreement. The following Architectural and Landscape Guidelines are to assist you and provide you with guidelines concerning the design, review and processing of your residence. The design, review and processing of each residence will be subject to direction and approval of the Architectural and Landscape Committee ("Architectural Committee") . The Design Guidelines are intended to enforce reasonable controls with regard to various aesthetic considerations for Montecito. These considerations are not meant to duplicate or supersede the functions normally provided by public agencies, but rather to coordinate and direct the design and construction of the custom lots with different architects, landscape architects, engineers, contractors and their owners so as to achieve a pattern of quality and outstanding character. The objectives of the Design Guidelines are to encourage and foster careful design so there is harmony between the homes, their sites, desert environment and overall Montecito image. Emphasis is placed on utilizing your property to its fullest potential within these Design Guidelines. To accomplish these objectives, the following considerations must be understood and accepted: (1) Guidelines for design and construction should be acknowledged for everyone's benefit; (2) A spirit of cooperation between the Architectural Committee and the owner; and (3) Guidelines cannot be all encompassing and consequently are meant to encourage, rather than restrict, creativity. Mont: 10/1/91 1 ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS Architectural Styles, Size and Height All home designs shall be single-story and shall conform with the Montecito style and theme such as Mediterranean, Spanish, Desert Contemporary and Santa Fe, similar and compatible to the model homes at Montecito. Other architecture will be reviewed on a case by case situation providing it conforms with the standards of Montecito. The minimum size for a residence is 2 , 200 square feet of interior livable space. The maximum lot coverage, including both the livable area and garage is 35% of the total square footage of the lot. All lots have been graded to a finish grade elevation that was originally approved by the City of Palm Desert. Any alteration to this existing grading must be approved by the Architectural Committee and the City of Palm Desert. All heights of the completed residence are to be measured from the finished pad, and shall not exceed 18 feet. Selective areas within a house can be lowered or raised to create a more interesting floor plan. Also, pool and garden areas can be sunken to provide for privacy and design interest, but provisions for drainage must be addressed. Any alteration to the approved pad elevation are subject to the approval by the Architectural Committee and the City of Palm Desert. Building Setbacks Standard property setbacks are 20 feet front, 20 feet back, and 15 feet total side yard (minimum 7 on one side) . Corner lot side yard setbacks are 10 feet on the exterior side and 7 feet on the interior side. Roofed or trellised structures, i.e. gazebos must be set back 5 feet from the property line, 10 feet from the house and not more than 14 feet in height. Pools and spas may be set on the property line if they are engineered according to the requirements of the City. Roof overhangs and "architectural appendages" may encroach into the setbacks subject to Architectural Committee approval. Setbacks and conditions should be verified with the City of Palm Desert prior to preparation of any plans. No construction of any improvement, planter boxes, earth fill, or major (not easily removed) landscaping shall be done which would hinder the ability of the City of Palm Desert or appropriate governmental or utility agency from inspecting or repairing the underground line or lines which may be located in any easement area, side or front, and in particular, not within the area 7 feet back from the front curb of all lots, including both sides of corner lots. Mont: 10/1/91 2 Wall Requirements All walls require the approval of the Architectural Committee as to height, location, design, color, and material. All side and rear yard property line walls and footings should be centered and located directly on the property lines being developed. Top of footings must be placed below the lowest pad to either side of the wall and footings must not be visible above the finished pad. Height of the side yard walls is to be measured from the higher building pad elevation between two lots. Any elevation differential between pad will require construction of a retaining wall beneath the six foot property line wall. All property line walls must be masonry (masonry block minimum six inches to eight inches thick) and substantially similar or compatible with the color and finish of entry wall to Montecito. The walls may be in a color scheme which complements the home and which conforms to Montecito's desert color theme. Any other material must be submitted for approval from the Architectural Committee. The person who builds the first wall on a property line must paint the opposite side of the wall a neutral color approved by the Architectural Committee, unless the masonry block is a neutral earthtone color acceptable by the Committee. Any walls constructed in the front of any home cannot be higher than 4 feet within the 20 foot setback. Any variation will be on a case by case situation and must be approved prior to construction. An owner who constructs a residence on a lot will have to complete all applicable lot line walls if such residence is the first completed among adjacent lots. The property owner who originally constructs the property line wall is entitled to reimbursement as provided by the terms and provisions of the CC&Rs. Storage Areas and Utility Locations Storage areas are intended primarily for storage of trash, firewood, maintenance tools, etc. , and may be located in the side yard setback. Pool, air conditioning, irrigation and other mechanical equipment may be located in these storage areas, provided they do not present a noise problem to the adjoining residence. Six foot high masonry walls are required around the storage areas so that the interior of the storage area is not visible from the street or adjacent properties. Electric meters and panels, gas meters, sub-panels, telephone and television entrance service panels, etc. , must be out of Mont: 10/1/91 3 sight when viewed from the street or adjacent lots. They can be located in storage areas or on the house, or preferably in mechanical rooms. Access by the appropriate utility companies to the utility meters and equipment shall not be restricted. Residential Exterior Elevations The design element of a house shall be compatible with and complementary to each other and harmonious with the desert environment. Exterior treatments shall be similarly detailed around the entire house. All materials used on the house exterior should be compatible with and complementary to each other and to the overall design in style, texture, color, and character. All materials should relate to or be complementary to the desert environment. Materials/Colors: Due to climatic extremes, the use of wood on a residential exterior should be carefully considered. The use of wood on exterior walls as an accent element is encouraged because it adds "warmth" to any design, but it is a high maintenance item. The use of wood as the primary exterior material on a house is discouraged. Exterior building wall colors should harmonize with the desert environment and surrounding residences. No exterior materials shall have a high gloss or glare finish. Exterior hardscape colors should be complementary to exterior house colors. Roofs• Roofs shall maintain as low a profile as possible, and roofing materials shall be Spanish tile or similar material, and in colors which blend with adjacent natural surroundings. All roof materials for Santa Fe-style flat roofs shall not be visible. Any other material must be submitted for approval from the Architectural Committee. False mansards or other architectural element not an integral part of the design are not acceptable. Mechanical equipment shall not be visible on roof structure. Sheet metal work should be kept clean and simple with the minimum of exposed metal and generally should be painted to blend in with the surrounding materials. Chimneys• As fireplaces and chimneys are very dominant in architectural design, they need to be proportionate to and consistently detailed with the overall architectural design. Mont: 10/1/91 4 Skylights: Skylights must be integrally designed into the structure and should not be obtrusive. Satellite Receivers: Satellite Receivers shall be located in the rear yard and must be integrally designed into the structure or the landscaping. Every effort shall be used to minimize exposure to adjacent homes and they shall not be visible from common areas or the street. DESIGN APPROVAL PROCESS ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPE COMMITTEE ("Architectural Committee") The Architectural Committee established by the Montecito Homeowners Association at Palm Desert is responsible for reviewing and approving all Montecito site improvements and any revisions or alterations to those improvements. The goal of the Architectural Committee is to process each submittal fairly, consistently, in a timely manner and, most important, in accordance with the requirements of the Design Guidelines and Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R's) . The Architectural Committee, however, has the right to modify the Design Guidelines and also to waive any of the requirements on a case by case basis where, in the judgment of the Committee, the circumstances warrant a waiver or modification of the requirements. Please be aware that in regard to such a Committee waiver, or regarding any Committee decision in which discretion or best judgment is utilized, the decision of the Committee and any waiver or apparent precedent which results shall be applicable only to the particular issue and improvements which are the subject of the decision; under no circumstances shall such decision necessarily be applicable to a different improvement or property and other owners should not assume reliance on the decision. OWNER'S RESPONSIBILITY It is the owner's responsibility to make sure that his consultants (architect, landscape architect, etc. ) process through the Architectural Committee any exterior architectural and landscape construction or revisions. The owner is responsible for making sure his consultants and contractors construct its residence in conformance with approved plans and revisions. Mont: 10/1/91 5 DESIGN APPLICATION All drawing submittals and design review applications must be complete and in line with submittal requirements before the Architectural Committee will formally accept them for review. PRELIMINARY DESIGN SUBMITTAL The Preliminary Design submittal is meant to provide the owner and Committee with drawings that illustrate and communicate a design concept that is well integrated with the site and surroundings. The Committee will act on the Preliminary Design submittal within twenty days of submittal date. The Committee will need two sets of Preliminary Design drawings and one material board. After the Committee reviews and approves the Preliminary Design submittal, the Committee Chairman will sign two sets of drawings "APPROVED" and return one to the lot owner or his representative with a written notice of the Committee's approval. These drawings must be submitted to the City of Palm Desert for review and approval and should include the following information: North arrow, street names, submission date, date of revision, change or plan re-issue, vicinity map, legal description. Preliminary Design Drawings must include the following: 1. Site and Floor Plan (1/8 or 1/4 scale) : Easements; Pad elevation and grading plan; Building and pool setback lines; Roof overhang line; Slab elevations; All storage yards and equipment including trash area; All hardscape including material and color designations; Retaining or free-standing garden walls; garden gates and their finishes (include top of wall elevations) ; and, Square footage of the living space, the covered patio space and the garage and mechanical space. 2. Exterior Elevations (1/8 or 1/4 scale) : All four exterior elevations; Proposed exterior materials and finishes on walls and roofs; Proposed special architectural elements such as skylights, solar panels and covered patios; Maximum height of finished structure from pad elevation; Typical fascia and soffit details, typical exterior column details if any and typical garden wall details; and The outline of all garden walls with dash lines as they impact the house elevation. 3 . Roof Plan (1/8 scale) : Flat and sloped roof areas and how they are drained; Trellis areas, skylights, mechanical equipment; and Location of exterior walls and columns in relationship to roof edge. 4 . Grading and Drainage Plan (1/8 scale) : All information from the Site and Floor Plan; The means of achieving positive Mont: 10/1/91 6 drainage from all locations on the lot to an approved drainage location, and Location of all area drains. It must be confirmed with the City of Palm Desert that pad elevations and lot drainage will be constructed and maintained pursuant to the drainage plan approved for Montecito, as applicable to the particular lot for which the approval is sought. In particular, there shall be no interference with the planned and/or established drainage pattern over any lots and/or the property unless an alternative provision for proper drainage is approved by the City of Palm Desert. 5. Preliminary Landscape Plan (1/8 scale) : The plan shall be developed on an accurate base drawing indicating floor plan and window location, site plan information and grading or drainage, as appropriate. Depict all areas of landscape development which may include: Front entry features, driveway design, wall/fencing, lighting, garden areas, shade structures, water features, patios, pool or spas and general landscape plantings. The plans should be prepared by a registered Landscape Architect, Architect, or other professional landscape specialist and be sensitive to the architecture of the residences and qualities of the site; maintaining and enhancing views, softening architectural elevations, reducing glare, providing shade and generally providing some green relief. The plan should illustrate the character, scale and relationships of the landscape components and insure that the design intent of the architecture is complimented and not lost. The designs shall be that of a high quality level, and generally equal to or greater than the model home examples. Illustrate proposed landscape, trees, shrubs, lawn, berming and groundcover areas. Identify trees by botanic and common name. In addition to street trees in front and front-side yards, provide at least two 24" box minimum deciduous or semi-deciduous trees and two 24" box minimum evergreen trees (larger sizes are heavily encouraged) . Provide shrubbery located adjacent to the residence (foundation plantings) and groundcover to soften exterior elevations. water conserving plant material selections that project a lush green appearance are encouraged. Refer to attached plant list and coordinate with City for acceptable plant material at the time of installation. Shrub sizes shall be 5 gallon minimum with a maximum of 20% being no smaller than 1 gallon size. Landscapes shall be complete with an automatic irrigation system. 6. Material Board. Preliminary Design drawings should be accompanied by one 8-1/2" x 14" color board showing samples of the proposed finishes. Show materials, textures and colors of the building and garden walls, fascia, hardscape and roof. Actual material samples are required. Colors to be confined to neutral earth tones. Material Board will be retained by the association. Mont: 10/1/91 7 7. Approval Procedure: The Architectural Committee will act on all Working Drawings submissions within twenty days of submittal date. The Working Drawings format is left up to the design professional's discretion; however, the Committee does have certain requirements which should be included. They are as follows: a) ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPE INSPECTIONS During the duration of the construction phase, any number of informal inspections of the house and its surrounding improve- ments may be made by the Architectural Committee to ensure that the improvements being made conforms with the plans approved by the Committee. b) TREE MAINTENANCE All trees, shrubs and vegetation of any type within and at Montecito must be maintained so that the maximum height of said trees, shrubs or vegetation does not exceed 25 feet above street grade. It shall be the responsibility of each owner, for individual lots, and the Association for the common area, to maintain the trees, shrubs and vegetation in accordance with the 25 foot height limitation. This paragraph shall not apply to the decorative palm trees that the developer has presently installed or may install on each lot or in the common areas. c) SIGN REGULATION All signage within or at Montecito; except common area signage erected and/or maintained by the Association, shall in all respects conform to the sign requirements of the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions for the Homeowners Association at Palm Desert and the sign ordinance of the City of Palm Desert, whichever is more controlling. This paragraph shall apply to, but is not limited to, "For Sale" and construction signs erected by owners on individual lots. No signs or advertising shall be displayed to the public view other than on the individual lot owned by said lot owner, except signs used by the developer in connection with the development of the project. Mont: 10/1/91 g CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS In accordance with the requirements of the City of Palm Desert, construction periods shall be limited to: October 1 through April 30 Mondays through Fridays: 7 : 00 a.m. to 5: 30 p.m. Saturdays: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. No activities Sundays or national holidays May 1 through September 30 Mondays through Fridays: 6 a.m. to 7 p.m. Saturdays: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. No activities Sundays or national holidays SITE MAINTENANCE The general contractor, job superintendent, employees, subcontractors, and suppliers shall comply with the rules established for the maintenance and cleanliness of the site. The general contractor or job superintendent shall: 1. Maintain the site in a neat and clean condition, neatly stockpiling all materials delivered for or generated by the work and immediately remove any waste material or debris generated by the work. , 2 . All debris generated by employees, i.e, paper cans, bottles and litter shall be immediately removed from the job site. 3 . Remove all equipment, materials, supplies and temporary structures when any phase of the work is complete, leaving the area neat and clean. Equipment not in regular use must be removed from the job site. 4 . Keep .the streets, gutters and adjacent property clean and free of dirt, trash, debris or other material related to or caused by the work. Mont: 10/1/91 9 NATIVE AND INTRODUCED PLANT LIST TREES: Acacia smallii, (Sweet acacia) Brochychiton populneus, (Bottle tree) Callistemon viminalis, (Bottle brush) Cercidium microphyllum, (Foothill palo verde) Chilopsis linearis, (Desert willow) Cupressus arizonica, (Arizona cypress) Jacaranda mimosifola, (Jacaranda) Lagerstroemia indica, (Crape myrtle) Parkinsonia aculeata, (Mexican palo verde) Pinus canariensis, (Canary island pine) Pinus eldarica, (Mondell Pine) Pithecellobium fiexicaule, (Texas ebony) Pittosporum phillyraeoides, (Willow pittospurum) Prosopis alba, (Argentine mesquite) Rhus lancea, (African sumac) Schinus molle, (California pepper) Schinus terebinthefolius, (Brazilian pepper) Vauquelinia californica, (Arizona rosewood) SHRUBS: Agapanthus africanus, (Lily of the Nile) Bougainvillea 'La Jolla' , (Bougainvillea) Caesalpinea pulcherrima, (Red bird of paradise) Carissa species, (Natal plum) Euryops pectinatus, No common name Juniperus prostrata, (Prostrate Juniper) Juniperus sabina tamariscifolia, (Tam juniper) Juniperus "Seagreen" Lantana camara, (Common lantana) Leucophyllum frutescens 'cultivars' , (Texas ranger) Liriope muscari, (Big blue lily turf) Ophiopogon japonicus, (Mondo grass) Penisetum setaceum, (Fountain grass) Pittosporum tobira 'cultivars' , (Mock orange) Pyracantha species, (Fire thorn) Raphiolepis indica, (Indian hawthorne) Salvia Greggii, (Autum sage) Tecoma stans, (Yellow bells) Thevetia peruviana, (Yellow oleander) Xylosma congestum, No common name Mont: 10/1/91 10 PALMS: Beaucarnea recurvata, (Bottle palm) Brahea edulis, (Guadalupe palm) Chaemerops humilis, (Dwarf fan palm) Cocus plumosa, (Queen palm) Cycas revoluta, (Sago palm) Phoenix dactuilifera, (Date palm) Washingtonia filifera, (California fan palm) Washingtonia robusta, (Mexican fan palm) VINES• Bignonia violacea, (Violet trumpet vine) Bougainvillea species Ficus pumila, (Creeping fig) Gelsemium sempervirens, (Carolina jessamine) Lonicera japonica halliana, (Hall's honeysuckle) Tecomaria capensis, (Cape honeysuckle) Trachelospermum jasminoides, (Star jasmine) GROUND COVERS- Baccharis 'centennial' , (Cultivar of Baccharis sarothrodies) Cynodon dactylon, (Bermuda grass) Lantana montevidensis, (Purple trailing lantana) Lolium perenne, (Rye Grass) Myoporum parvifolium Oenothera berlandieri, (Mexican evening primrose) Rosmarinus O. prostratus, (Dwarf rosemary) Verbena peruviana, (Peruvian verbena) Mont: 10/1/91 11 Woberl `Beill,`William `Frost 6,c,9ssociates PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS, PLANNERS& SURVEYORS August 26, 1991 JN 300516 Mr. Ray Diaz, Community Development Director CITY OF PALM DESERT 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, California 92260 Subject: Tentative Tract Map No. 24530 Dear Ray: We have processed and recorded the first phase tract map on Tract 24530 containing 40 lots. The phasing plan, submitted and reviewed, by the City set forth five phases for the 280 lot project. The client is now ready to proceed with processing the next phase of the project. In contacting your office we have learned that the original approval date of the Tentative Map was July 5, 1989. Since this project has been moving ahead and now has the first 40 lot under construction, it is our hope that the work in progress on the project is sufficient evidence to permit the project phases to proceed to develop under the original Conditions of Approval. The client, Baron's Financial is ready to proceed with the next phase. Larry Jones and I would appreciate meeting with you at your earliest convenience to outline the procedure for processing the next phase. Sincerely, - Thomas F. Lagier, Vice President TFL:mhc\mrresp\300516.826 `Prgfessiortal service since 1944 74-410 HIGHWAY 111 • PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260-4114 •(619) 346-7481 • FAX(619)346-8315 OFFICES IN IRVINE • CORONA • NEWPORT BEACH • SACRAMENTO • SAN DIEGO • TEMECULA J IxL�LorFlcx rnrxxuuaxa� CITY OF PALM DESERT TO: MAYOR WALT SNYDER FROM: STEVE SMITH, ASSOCIATE PLANNER DATE: MARCH 8, 1991 SUBJECT: MONL'ECITO PROJECT Per your request, we discussed the naming of projects with Dave Erwin and then with Baron's Financial Group (the developer using the "Montecito" name). Dave Erwin advised that naming projects is not something which the city regulates, reviews or approves. The written response from the developer (copy attached) indicates that they apparently followed the law in naming their project. It appears that this is a civil matter between two parties, and should be settled between them. STEVE SMITH V` ASSOCIATE PLANNER SS/db Attachment e.lclCU`O�?i Si � cY/`t?� REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS & DEVELOPMENT 69730 HIGHWAY 111, STE. 212 • RANCHO MIRAGE, CA 92270 (619) 328-9111 Facsimile: (619) 328-9367 March 1, 1991 RE: Montecito Project - Palm Desert To Whom It May Concern: Prior to adapting the name "Montecito') for their project, the principals of Montecito carefully reviewed all of the existing and contemplated land and housing projects in the Palm Desert area. After doing so, they determined that using the name would not be in conflict or compete unfairly with any other project in the area. Upon making this determination, the intent to use the name "Montecito') was published in the local newspaper for the required statutory period and a fictitious name filing was accepted by the County Clerk on May 30, 1990. Prior to forming its homeowners corporation, Montecito made a similar search of the Statewide records to determine if the name "Montecito at Palm Desert" was being used elsewhere in the State. In finding that it was not, Montecito filed Articles of Incorporation for a corporation of that name and the corporation and the name were approved by the State on September 27, 1990. Montecito by , General Partner rmNLnTES ARCHITECTURAL REVMA C'M+IISSICN AUGUST 28, 1990 2. ctgSE`NO.:-TP_24530--17 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS: GEORGE JELKS, 7307 Birdie Street, Oceanside, CA 92056 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Final approval of entry design, fountain, sign, guard office, street lighting and landscape plan LOCATION: South and west of frank Sinatra and Cook Street ZONE: PR-5 Commissioner Drury noted that the previous landscape plan was a large mixture of plants which the applicant was directed to simplify. Chairman Gregory addressed the landscaping concerns along the wall with the applicant. Applicant rioted that he would be using a type of sealer on the wall to prevent ,the water stains from the sprinkler system being proposed. Chairman Gregory noted that the number of plant species was cut in half, however they were not draught tolerant. He added that he would prefer drought tolerant landscaping but did not think it was fair to inflict this option onto the applicant now if this is not a set policy, and one that the applicant has not been informed about until now. ccomissioner Gregory felt the problems that were of concern previously were addressed. Action: It was moved by Commissioner Drury, sew by Commissioner McCrea, to grant final approval of plans as submitted. Motion carried 5-0. 3. CASE NO.: 1805 SA APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): LORAN LORAN, 73-080 E1 Paseo, Palm Desert, CA 92260 NATURE OF PROJDCT/APPROVAL SOUGHT• Awning and sign approval LOCATION: 73-080 El Paseo ZONE: C-1 It was moved by commission to continue the case as the applicant was not present and they had concerns regarding the location of the proposed awning. Motion carried unanimously. 3 mow {' C�of � off pa0� RD(�@N 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT CALIFORN IA 92260 TELEPHONE(619)346-0611 PLAMIIAG 011-MSSICN MEFrIAG NUMCE OF ACTION Date: July 6, 1989 Baron's Financial Group Bein/Fi-ost 69-730 Highway ill, Suite 212 Charles Haver Division Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 74-390 Highway 111 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Re: TT 24530 The Planning Comnission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of July 5, 1989. PLANNING CO6MLSSI0N APPROVED TT 245W BY ADOPTION OF SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS AS AMEf�ID. MOIICN RESOIIl1ION 1364 VVI,ID ND) CARRlID 4-1 (O�lIISSI0IIR JONATHAN Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Ccmmin'ty Development, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. zo* , S PALM DESERT PLANNING SSION RAD/tm cc: Coachella Valley Water District Public Works Department Building & Safety Department it Fire Marshal 44I G COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1364 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING OMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP TO SUBDIVIDE 90 GROSS ACRES INTO 277 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS, LOCATED SOUTH AND WEST OF FRANK SINATRA DRIVE AND COOK STREET, MJRE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS APN 620-190-006-009; 011; 013; 014; 017. CASE NO. TT 24530 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 5th day of July, 1989, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider the request of BARON'S FINANCIAL GROUP for the above mentioned Project; and WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedure for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 80-89, " in that the director of community development has determined that the project will not have a significant impact on the environment and a negative declaration has been prepared; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said planning Commissiondid find the following facts and reasons as justified in the staff report for TT 24530 dated July 5, 1989, on file in the department of community development, to exist to approve the tentative tract map: (a) That the proposed map is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. (b) That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. (c) That the site is physically suitable for the type of development. (d) That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development. (e) That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. (f) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems. (g) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. WHEREAS, in the review of this tentative tract map the Planning commission has considered the effect of the cmtemplated action on the housing needs of the region for purposes of balancing these needs against the public service needs of the residents of the City of Palm Desert and its environs, with available fiscal and environmental resources. 'PLANNING QI+JJSSIUJ PION NO. 1364 NOW, 'I7IEREMPE, DE IT RESOLVED by the d_ Plaivt{nq Ccmnission of the City of Palm Desert, Californa, as follows: 1. 71'at the above recitations are true and oorrpct and constitute the findings of the caimission in this case. 2. That it (k)es hereby approve the above described Tentative Tract Map No. TT 24530 for the reasons set forth in this resolution and subject to the attached conditions, PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Cannission, held on this 5th day of July, 1989, by the following vote, to wit: — AYES: DOWNS, RICIIARDS, WIIITLOCK, AND ERWOOD NOES: JOUNIIIAN ABSENT: II1ONE ADSTAIN: tlOidE RICiU112D ERNgpD, nan ATTEST MION A. DIA2, Secret SRS/bn 2 PIAWDU CO"-IISSION RESOLLYNON NO. 1364 CONDITIONS OF APPEKNAL CASE NO. TT 245M Department of Community Develcpment/pl 1. The development of the Property shall conform substantially with exhibits on file with the department of community development/plannirr3, as modified by the following conditions. 2• Construction of a portion of said project shall commmenon within one year from the date of final approval unless an extension of time is granted; otherwise said approval shall become null, void and of no effect whatsoever. 3. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein which are in addition to all municipal ordinances and state and federal statutes now in force, or which hereafter may be .in fore, 4. Prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contemplated by this approval, the applicant shall first obtain permits and/or clearance from the following agencies: Coachella Valley Water District Palm Desert Architectural Commission City Fire Marshal Public Works Department Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to the department of building and safety at the time of issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith, 5. Minimum setback for lots with single story dwellings shall be: Front 20 feet Rear 20 feet Sides 15 feet total, minimum 7 feet. 6. That the applicant submit and receive approval of the architectural review commission of a landscape and wall plan. Department of Public Wcwks 1. Drainage fees, in accordance with Section 26.49 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code and Palm Desert Ordinance Number 507, shall be paid prior to recordation of final map. -� 3 Pf ANNI% Oa4IISSION RhsuiAyricN to. 1364 2. Drainage facilities shall be provided, Per Ordinance No. 218 and the NOrthside Area Drainage Master Plan, to the specifications of the director of public works. 3. Storm drain construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study Prepared by a registered civil engineer that 'is reviewed and approved by the department of public works prior to start of construction. 4. Signalization fees, in accordance with City of Palm Desert Resolution Nos, 79-17 and 79-55, shall be paid prior to recordation of final map, 5. Full public improvements, as required by Sections 26.40 and 26.44 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code, shall be installed in accordance with applicable city standards, 6. As required under Palm Desert Municipal Code Section 26.28, and in accordance with Section 26.28, and in accordance with Sections 26.40 and 26.44, complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted to the director of public works for checking approval before construction of any improvements is camienced. Offsite improvement plans to be approved by the public works deparbment and a surety posted to guarantee the installation of required offsite improvements prior to recordation of final map. Such offsite improvements shall include, but not be limited to, curb and gutter, asphalt paving and concrete sidewalk in an appropriate size and configuration and provisions for deceleration lanes at the all project entry points. "As-built" plans shall be submitted to, and approved by, the director of public works prior to acceptance of the improvements by the city. 7. Improvement plans for water and sewer systems shall be approved by the respective service districts with "as-built" plans submitted to the department of public works prior to project final, 8. All public improvements shall be inspected by the department of public works and a standard inspection fee shall be paid prior to issuance of grading permits. 9. Landscaping maintenance on Cook Street and Frank Sinatra Drive shall be Provided by the homeowners association. 10. Waiver of access to Cook Street and Frank Sinatra except at approved locations shall be granted on the final map. 11. In accordance with Palm Desert Municip al Code Section 26.44, complete grading plans and specifications shall be submitted to the director of public works for checking and approval prior to issuance of any permits, 4 PLANNING CCR-1ISSICN ice;;.✓PI(N NO. 1364 12. In accordance with Palm Desert Municipal Code Section 27.12.067 prior to issuance of grading permits associated with this project an erosion control plan shall be submitted to the director of public works for review and approval. If mass grading of the site is proposed, those areas graded but not under construction shall be planted with a natural desert vegetation mix and properly irrigated to prevent blowing dust or sand. 13. The applicant shall provide for the installation of landscaping in the existing median island in Cook Street and Frank Sinatra Drive along the property frontage. Landscape plans for the subject installation shall be reviewed and approved by the public works department prior to any installation. 14. Traffic safety striping shall be provided to the specifications of the Director of Public Works. A traffic control plan must be submitted to, and approved by, the director of public works prior to the placement of any pavement markings. 15. Full improvements of interior streets based on residential street standards in accordance with Section 26.40 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code shall be provided. 16. Complete tract map shall be submitted as required by ordinance to the director of public works for checking and approval and be recorded before issuance of any permits. 17. Any and all offsite improvements shall be preceded by the approval of plans and the issuance of valid encroachment.permits by the department of public works. 18. A complete preliminary soils investigation, conducted by a registered soils engineer, shall be submitted to and approved by the department of public works prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 19. Pad elevations, as shown on the tentative map are subject to review and modification in accordance with Chapter 27 of the Palm Desert Muniicipal Code. 20. Property lines for the indivirlial lots proposed by this subdivision shall be located at tope of slope where applicable. 21. As required under Section 12.16 and Section 26.44 of the Palm Desert Municipal coda, all existing utilities shall be undergrounded per each respective utility districts recommendation. If determined to be unfeasible, applicant shall agree to participate in any future utility unden3rounding district. 5 PLANNING, M11ISSION ,.r5i.. MICN N3. 1364 22. As required by Sections 26.32 and 26.40 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code, and in accordance with the Circulation Network of the City's General Plan, dedication of half-street right-of-way at 55 feet on Cook Street and Frank Sinatra Drive shall be provided on the final map. 23. Applicant shall agree to contribute their fair share to the assessed costs for the Cook Street Extension, Interstate 10 interchange and Bridge Fund. Riverside County Eire Department: 1. The fire department is required to set a mininnan fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commercial buildings per Uniform Fire Code Sec. 10.301C. 2. Provide or show there exists a water system capable of providing a potential fire flow of 1500 gpm and the actual fire flaw available from any one hydrant connected to any given water main shall be 1500 gpm for 2 hours duration at 20 psi residual operating pressure. 3. A fire flour of 1500 gpm for a 2 hair duration at 20 psi residual operating pressure must be available before any cambustible material is placed on the job site. 4. The required fire flow shall be available frcm a Super hydrant(s) (6" x 4" x 2-1/2" x 2-1/2" ), located not less than 25' nor more than 200' from any portion of the building(s) as measured along approved vehicular travelways. Hydrants installed below 3000' elevation shall be of the "wet barrel" type. 5. Prior to the application for a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and two copies of the water system plan to the county fire department for review. No building permit shall be issued until the water system plan has been approved by the county fire chief. Upon approval, the original will be returned. One copy will be sent to the responsible inspecting authority. 6. Plans shall conform to fire hydrant types, location and spacing, and the system shall meet the fire flow requirements. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and may be signed by the local water company with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Riverside Country Fire Department." 7. Certain designated areas will be required to be maintained as fire lanes. 8. Whenever access into private property is controlled through use of gates, barriers, guard houses or similar means, provision shall be made to facilitate access by emergency vehicles in a manner approved by the fire 6 PLANNI d'i (CM IISSICN 1. l'ICN NO. 1364 I department. All controlled access devices that are power operated shall have a radio-oentrolled over-ride system capable of opening the gate when activated by a special transmitter located in emergency vehicles. Devices shall be equipped with backup power facilities to operate in the event of power failure. All controlled access devices that are not power operated shall also be approved by the fire department. Minimian opening width shall be 12' with a minirmun vertical clearance of 13'6". 9. Contact the fire department for a final inspection prior to occupancy. SRS/tm 7 :XEROX TELE(fOF"IER ?010 ; 11-16-69 3:52FIl ; CC'•TT 63-) 6193417098;#12 Hov 16 '09 16:45 RBFITF ti DESERT P.2/2 1 REAL ESTATE 1NVE,5TMENTS &_ 0EvELOIMENT 69730 HIGHWAY 111, STE, 212 • AANCHb MIRAGE, CA 91270 (619) 313.9111 November 16, 1989 Mr. Tom Lagier ROBERT BEIN , WILLIAM FROST & ASSOC. 74-410 Highway Ill Palm Desert , CA 92260 Dear Tom: Listed below arQ some street names we came up with—for. the Cook Street property: Taylor Avenue, Street , Road, Court , Lane or Way Whitehawk Covington 11 J Duns=r-e wa 9iW 10 Ridgeway Southridge Brentwood Montana Hiliorest on nk ybu , J nne S . Smith fi • l T(1T01 P M7 NXICE OF DETERI%UMTIaI Negative Declaration y TO: 00 County Clerk ( ) Secretary for Resources County of Riverside 1416 Ninth St., Roan 1311 4050 Main Street Sacramento, CA 95814 Riverside, CA 92507 FROM: City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, Ca 92260 SUBJECT: Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108 or 21152 of the public resources code. Project Title/Oonmon Name: Baron's Financial Group/TT24530 Date of Project Approval: July 5, 1989 State Clear;mbouse Number (if submitted): Contact Person: Steve Smith Project Location: South end west of Frank Sinatra and Cook Street Project Description: 277 single family lots This is to advise that the City of Palm Desert has made the following determin- ations regarding the above described project: 1. The project ( )will, Mwill not, have a significant effect on the environment. 2. An environmental impact report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. A copy of the negative declaration may be examined at the above city hall address. _X__A negative declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. A copy of the negative declaration may be examined at the above city hall address. 3. Mitigation measures ()Owere ( )were not, made a condition of the approval of the project. 4. A statement of overriding considerations ( )was, ()Owas not, adopted for this project. CLERK OF THE BOARD Neg DedarationlNtc Determination Tied per P.R.C.21152 00ARD OF SUFERViSOH; POSTED Signature Title P - ITI, _ OCI ; O189 Date Received for Filing Zofl�v. Duty tSl'; of Riverside,Stateof California A, AGENDA ITEM NO.: IV-A-6 DATE: JULY 10, 1990 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMM rSSION CASE No. : TT 24530-1 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): GEORGE W. JELKS, 2307 Birdie Street, Oceanside, CA 92056 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of subdivision entry LOCATION: West side Cook Street between Country Club and Frank Sinatra ZONE: PR-5 DISCUSSION: Entry will be flanked by water walls and landscaping. The ground cover, tall fescue lawn, should be replaced with bermuda. Fountain grass is also included which can became a pest. RECOMMENDATION: Grant approval with appropriate landscape substitutions. PD/db _, 0111111 NOTICE OF DEI'E imTIm Negative Declaration TO: 00 County Clerk ( ) Secretary for Resources County of Riverside 1416 Ninth St., Roan 1311 4050 Main Street Sacramento, CA 95814 Riverside, CA 92507 FRCM: City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, Ca 92260 SUBJE7Cr: Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108 or 21152 of the public resources code. Project Title/Cartoon Name: Baron's Financial Group/TP24530 Date of Project Approval: July 5, 1989 State Clearinghouse Number (if submitted): Contact Person: Steve Smith Project Location: South end west of Frank Sinatra and Cook Street j Project Des cri cn: 277 single family lots This is to advise that the City of Palm Desert has made the following determin- ations regarding the above described project: 1. The project ( )will, Mwill not, have a significant effect on the environment. � I 2. An environmental impact report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. A copy of the negative declaration may be examined at the above city hall address. A negative declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. A copy of the negative declaration may be examined at the above city hall address. 3. Mitigation measures 00were, ( )were not, made a condition of the approval of the project. j 4. A statement of overriding considerations ( )was, 60was not, adopted for this project. Signature Title Date Received for Filing i I Y L_ 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE(619)346-0611 PLANNING ODNNIISSICN MEEPIM NOTICE OF ACITCN Date: July 6, 1989 Baron's Financial Group Bein/fit 69-730 Highway ill, Suite 212 Charles Haver Division Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 74-390 Highway ill Palm Desert, CA 92260 Re: TT 24530 The Planning Cam issicn of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of July 5, 1989. PLANNING C0144ESSION APPROVED TT 24530 BY ADDPrICNT OF RESCU PICN NO 1364 SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS AS AMENDED. Ni1FICN CARRIED 4-1 (CIMMISSICNM JONATHAN VO'IM NO). Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Cc m rrdty Develcpnent, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. RAMDN A. , S PALM DESERT PLANNING�SSION RAD/tn cc: Coachella Valley Water District Public Works Department Building & Safety Department Fire Marshal PLANNING OOMMI SIGN R MOLUTION NO. 1364 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING CrNMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP TO SUBDIVIDE 90 GROSS ACRES INTO 277 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS, LOCATED SOUTH AND WEST OF FRANK SINATRA DRIVE AND COOK STREET, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS APN 620-190-006-009; 011; 013; 014; 017. CASE NO. TT 24530 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 5th day of July, 1989, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider the request of BARON'S FINANCIAL GROUP for the above mentioned project; and WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedure for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 80-89, " in that the director of cammu-Lity development has determined that the project will not have a significant impact on the environment and a negative declaration has been prepared; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said planning commission did find the following facts and reasons as justified in the staff report for TT 24530 dated July 5, 1989, on file in the department of community development, to exist to approve the tentative tract map: (a) That the proposed map is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. (b) That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. (c) That the site is physically suitable for the type of development. (d) That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development. (e) That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. (f) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems. (g) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. WHEREAS, in the review of this tentative tract map the planning commission has considered the effect of the contemplated action on the housing needs of the region for purposes of balancing these needs against the public service needs of the residents of the City of Palm Desert and its environs, with available fiscal and environmental resources. PLANNING CU-MSSION RESOLUTION ND. 1364 1� NOW, TI¢;REFORE, BE .IT RESOLVED by the Planning Ccmtission of the City Of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the oonnmission in this case. 2. That it does hereby approve the above described Tentative Tract Map No. TT 24530 for the reasons set forth in this resolution and subject to the attached conditions. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 5th day of July, 1989, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: DOWNS, RICHARDS, WHITLOCK, AND ERWOOD NOES: JONA'I'HAN ABSENT: bTONE / ABSTAIN: NONE RIC}IARD ERWOOD, Chairman ATTEST* AIL" . RAMON A. DIAZ, Secret SRS/tm 2 M , PLAN[DU Qaf-TISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1364 CONDITIONS OF APPRUM CASE NO. TT 24530 DeparbTent of Cam uitty Develop 2nt/Pl 1. The development of the property shall conform substantially with exhibits on file with the department of community development/planning, as modified by the following conditions. 2. Construction of a portion of said project shall commence within one year from the date of final approval unless an extension of time is granted; otherwise said approval shall become null; void and of no effect whatsoever. 3. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitaticns set forth herein which are in addition to all municipal ordinances and.state and federal statutes now in force, or which hereafter may be in force. 4. Prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contemplated by this approval, the applicant shall first obtain permits and/or clearance from the following agencies: Coachella Valley Water District Palm Desert Architectural Commission City Fire Marshal Public Works Department Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to the department of building and safety at the time of issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. 5. Minimmm setback for lots with single story dwellings shall be: Front 20 feet Rear 20 feet Sides 15 feet total, minimum 7 feet. 6. That the applicant submit and receive approval of the architectural review commission of a landscape and wall plan. Department of Public Works: 1. Drainage fees, in accordance with Section 26.49 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code and Palm Desert Ordinance NuTber 507, shall be paid prior to recordation of final map. 3 w PLANNIM CCKIISSICN RFSOLTrICN NO. 1364 2. Drainage facilities shall be provided, per Ordinance No. 218 and the Northside Area Drainage Master Plan, to the specifications of the director of public works. 3. Storm drain construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study prepared by a registered civil engineer that is reviewed and approved by the department of public works prior to start of construction. 4. Signalization fees, in accordance with City of Palm Desert Resolution Nos. 79-17 and 79-55, shall be paid prior to recordation of final map. 5. Full public improvements, as required by Sections 26.40 and 26.44 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code, shall be installed in accordance with applicable city standards. 6. As required under, Palm Desert Municipal Code Section 26.28, and in accordance with Section 26.28, and in accordance with Sections 26.40 and 26.44, complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted to the director of public works for checking approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. Offsite improvement plans to be approved by the public works department and a surety posted to guarantee the installation of required offsite improvements prior to recordation of final map. Such offsite improvements shall include, but not be limited to, curb and gutter, asphalt paving and concrete sidewalk in an appropriate size and configuration and provisions for deceleration lanes at the all project entry points. "As-built" plans shall be submitted to, and approved by, the director of public works prior to acceptance of the improvements by the city. 7. Improvement plans for water and sewer systems shall be approved by the respective service districts with "as-built" plans submitted to the department of public works prior to project final. 8. All public improvements shall be inspected by the department of public works and a standard inspection fee shall be paid prior to issuance of grading permits. 9. Landscaping maintenance on Cook Street and Frank Sinatra Drive shall be provided by the homeowners association. 10. Waiver of access to Cook Street and Frank Sinatra except at approved locations shall be granted on the final map. 11. In accordance with Palm Desert Municipal Code Section 26.44, complete grading plans and specifications shall be submitted to the director of public works for checking and approval prior to issuance of any permits. 4 PLANNIM CXPTISSICN 1UNCLUTIM NO. 1364 12. In accordance with Palm Desert Municipal Code Section 27.12.067 prior to issuance of grading permits associated with this project an erosion control plan shall be submitted to the director of public works for review and approval. If mass grading of the site is proposed, those areas graded but not under construction shall be planted with a natural desert vegetation mix and properly irrigated to prevent blowing dust or sand. 13. The applicant shall provide for the installation of landscaping in the existing median, island in Cook Street and Frank Sinatra Drive along the property frontage. Landscape plans for the subject installation shall be reviewed and approved by the public works department prior to any installation. 14. Traffic safety striping shall be provided to the specifications of the Director of Public Works. A traffic control plan must be submitted to, and approved by, the director of public works prior to the placement of any pavement markings- - 15. Full improvements of interior streets based on residential street standards in accordance with Section 26.40 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code shall be provided. 16. Complete tract map shall be submitted as required by ordinance to the director of public works for checking and approval and be recorded before issuance of any permits. 17. Any and all offsite its shall be preceded by the approval of plans and the issuance of valid encroachment permits by the department of public works. 18. A complete preliminary soils investigation, conducted by a registered soils engineer, shall be submitted to and approved by the department of public works prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 19. Pad elevations, as shown on the tentative map are subject to review and modification in accordance with Chapter .27 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code. 20. Property lines for the individual lots proposed by this subdivision shall be located at tope of slope where applicable. 21. As required under Section 12.16 and Section 26.44 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code, all existing utilities shall be undergrounded per each respective utility districts recommendation. If determined to be unfeasible, applicant shall agree to participate in any future utility Luxiergroi nding district. 5 ,s PLANNING CCKUSSICN MsaU iZON NO. 1364 i 22. As required by Sections 26.32 and 26.40 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code, and in accordance with the Circulation Network of the City's General Plan, dedication of half-street right-of-way at 55 feet on Cook Street and Frank Sinatra Drive shall be provided on the final map. 23. Applicant shall agree to contribute their fair share to the assessed costs for the Cook Street Extension, Interstate 10 interchange and Bridge Fund. Riverside sty Fire Department: 1. The fire department is required to set a minimum fire flaw for the remodel or construction of all ccmnercial buildings per Uniform Fire Code Sec. 10.301C. 2. Provide or show there exists a water system capable of providing a potential fire flaw of 1500 gpn and the actual fire flaw available from any one hydrant connected to any given water main shall be 1500 gpn for 2 hours duration at 20 psi residual operating pressure. 3. A fire flaw of 1500 gpn for a 2 hour duration at 20 psi residual operating pressure must be available before any combustible material is placed on the ,job site. � 4. The required fire flow shall be available from a Super hydrant(s) (6" x 4" x 2-1/2" x 2-1/2"), located not less than 25' nor more than 200' from any portion of the building(s) as measured along approved vehicular travelways. Hydrants installed below 3000' elevation shall be of the "wet barrel" type. 5. Prior to the application for a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and two copies of the water system plan to the county fire department for review. No building permit shall be issued until the water system plan has been approved by the county fire chief. Upon approval, the original will be returned. One copy will be sent to the responsible inspecting authority. 6. Plans shall conform to fire hydrant types, location and spacing, and the system shall meet the fire flow requirements. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and may be signed by the local water company with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Riverside Country Fire Department." 7. Certain designated areas will be required to be maintained as fire lanes. 8. Whenever access into private property is controlled through use of gates, barriers, guard houses or similar means, provision shall be made to facilitate access by emergency vehicles in a manner approved by the fire 6 Pf"MG C1CDI4. SSICN IUMMICN ND. 1364 department. All controlled access devices that are power operated shall have a radio-controlled over-ride system capable of opening the gate when activated by a special transmitter located in emergency vehicles. Devices shall be equipped with backup power facilities to operate in the event of power failure. All controlled access devices that are not power operated shall also be approved by the fire department. Minimmn opening width shall be 12' with a minumnn vertical clearance of 13'6". 9. Contact the fire department for a final inspection prior to occupancy. SRS/tm 7 � t PROOF OF PUB CATION This space is forth;J;. _,nty Clerk's Filing Stamp (2015.5 C.C.P.) STATE OF CALIFORNIA, County of Riverside I am a citizen of the United States and a CITY OF PALM DESERT resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to Proof of Publication of or interested in the above-entitled matter. I CASE NO . TT 24530 am the principal clerk of the printer of the .. ......................... CRY OF PALM DESERT DESERT POST LEGAL NOTICE ................................. CASE NO.TT 24530 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by BARONS FINANCIAL GROUP for approval of a tentative tract """"""""""""""' map for 276 single family lots having minimum lot areas of 10,000 a newspaper of general circulation, printed square feet and a minimum lot width of 60 feet on 90 acres of PR- 5 zoned land located south and west of Frank Sinatra and Cook Streets, more Particularly described as: and published ..B I-WEEKLY AAPD PN620-190-006 through 009, 011;013,014,017 public hearing wit be held on Wednesday, July S. 1989, at 7:00 p.m.in the Council Chamber at the Palm Desert Civic Center, PALM DESERT aid pla�Frred l Wang interested e, Palm Desert, California, at which time in the City Of ............... Persons are invited to be heard. If ou County of Riverside, and which news. challenge the Proposed actions in court, you may be Ii,flo to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public paper has been adjudged a newspaper hearing described In this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the planning commission(or city council)at,or prior to, of general circulation by the Superior the public hearing. Court of the County of Riverside, State Of - RAMON A. DIAZ. secretary Palm Desert Planning Commission F (Pub. D.P.June 23. 1989) California, under the dateof. !P/5•, 1964,, Case Number J,30.$......; that the notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpareil), has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: 6/23 .................................................... all in the year 19.$9.. I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated at.....PALMI DESERT ............................... California,thi/ss..23r.d.day�of DUNE 19&9. Signature Free copies of this blank form mev be secured from: CALIFORNIA NEWSPAPER SERVICE BUREAU, INC. Legal Advertising Clearing House 120 west Second St., Los Angeles, Calif. 90012 Telephone: (213) 625-2541 Please reouut GENE R A L Proof of Publication when orderina this form. s 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE(619)346-0611 PLANNING CCNMISSICN MEETING NOTICE OF ACTION Date: July'6, 1989 Baron's Financial Group Bein/Frost 69-730 Highway ill, Suite 212 Charles Haver Division Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 74-390 Highway ill Palm Desert, CA 92260 Re: TT 24530 The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of July 5, 1989. PLANNING C"UISSION APPROVED TT 24530 BY ADOPTION OF RESOLi1PICN NO 1364 SUBJBCP TO CONDITIcNs AS AmBNDED. MTPION CARRIED 4-1 (cJ44 SSICNER jcmTHAN VOTED NO). Any appeal of the above action may be made in ,Writing to the Director of Ccmm )Lity Development, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen (15) days of the date of the,decision. RAMON A. DIAZ, S PALM DESERT PLANNING SSION RAD/tm cc: Coachella Valley Water District Public Works Department Building & Safety Department Fire Marshal PIANN DG COMMISSION IESOLUfl'ION NO. 1364 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING CLMNISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP TO SUBDIVIDE 90 GROSS ACRES INTO 277 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS, LOCATED SOUTH AND WEST OF FRANK SINATRA DRIVE AND COOK STREET, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS APN 620-190-006-009; 011; 013; 014; 017. CASE NO. TT 24530 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 5th day of July, 1989, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider the request of BARON'S FINANCIAL GROUP for the above mentioned project; and WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedure for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 80-89, " in that the director of community development has determined that the project will not have a significant impact on the environment and a negative declaration has been prepared; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said planning commission did find the following facts and reasons as justified in the staff report for TT 24530 dated July 5, 1989, on file in the department of community development, to exist to approve the tentative tract map: (a) That the proposed map is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. (b) That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. (c) That the site is physically suitable for the type of development. (d) That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development. (e) That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. (f) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems. (g) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. WHEREAS, in the review of this tentative tract map the planning commission has considered the effect of the contemplated action on the housing needs of the region for purposes of balancing these needs against the public service needs of the residents of the City of Palm Desert and its environs, with available fiscal and environmental resources. 1 PLANNING COMMISSION RLSOLUUON NO. 1364 J NOW, 'I'EIFREfORE, RE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the commission in this case. 2. That it does hereby approve the above described Tentative Tract Map No. TT 24530 for the reasons set forth in this resolution and subject to the attached conditions. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 5th day of July, 1989, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: DOWNS, RICIIARDS, MUTLOCK, AND ERWOOD NOES: JOJA'ITIAN ABSENr: Ix�NE ABSTAIN: NONE RICHARD ERWOOD, Chairman A'I"I'ES'r•• AIL" .ds RAMON A. DIAZ, Secret SRS/tm 2 t r PLANNDG C 4ff.SSION RESOLUTION NO. 1364 OOMITIC1NS OF APPROVAL CASE NO. TP 24530 Department of Comirrity Developmerrt/Plannirng: 1. The development of the property shall conform substantially with exhibits on file with the department of community development/planning, as modified by the following conditions. 2. Construction of a portion of said project shall cammennce within one year from the date of final approval unless an extension of time is granted; otherwise said approval shall become null, void and of no effect whatsoever. 3. The development. of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein which are in addition to all municipal ordinances and state and federal statutes now in force, or which hereafter may be in force. 4. Prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of any use oontemplated by this approval, the applicant shall first obtain permits and/or clearance from the following agencies: Coachella Valley Water District Palm Desert Architectural Commission City Fire Marshal Public Works Department Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to the department of building and safety at the time of issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. 5. Minimum setback for lots with single stay dwellings shall be: Front 20 feet Rear 20 feet Sides 15 feet total, minimum 7 feet. 6. That the applicant submit and receive approval of the architectural review commission of a landscape and wall plan. Department of Public Works: 1. Drainage fees, in accordance with Section 26.49 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code and Palm Desert Ordinance Number 507, shall be paid prior to recordation of final map. 3 r PLANNIM COMKISSICN RFSOLUTICN NO. 1364 2. Drainage facilities shall be provided, per Ordinance No. 218 and the Northside Area Drainage Master Plan, to the specifications of the director of public works. 3. Storm drain construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study prepared by a registered civil engineer that is reviewed and approved by the department of public works prior to start of construction. 4. Signalization fees, in accordance with City of Palm Desert Resolution Nos. 79-17 and 79-55, shall be paid prior to recordation of final map. 5. Frill public improvements, as required by Sections 26.40 and 26.44 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code, shall be installed in accordance with applicable city standards. 6. As required under Palm Desert Municipal Code Section 26.28, and in accordance with Section 26.28, and in accordance with Sections 26.40 and 26.44, complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted to the director of public works for checking approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. Offsite improvement plans to be approved by the public works department and .a surety posted to guarantee the installation of required offsite improvements prior to recordation of final map. Such offsite improvements shall include, but not be limited to, curb and gutter, asphalt paving and concrete sidewalk in an appropriate size and configuration and provisions for deceleration lanes at the all project entry points. "As-built" plans shall be submitted to, and approved by, the director of public works prior to acceptance of the improvements by the city. 7. Improvement plans for water and sewer systems shall be approved by the respective service districts with "as-built" plans submitted to the department of public works prior to project final. 8. All public improvements shall be inspected by the department of public works and a standard inspection fee shall be paid prior to issuance of grading permits. 9. Landscaping maintenance on Oook Street and Frank Sinatra Drive shall be provided by the homeowners association. 10. Waiver of access to Cook Street and Frank Sinatra except at approved locations shall be granted on the final map. 11. in accordance with Palm Desert Municipal Code Section 26.44, complete grading plans and specifications shall be submitted to the director of public works for checking and approval prior to issuance of any permits. 4 PLANNIM COMMISSION FdSOL TPICN ND. 1364 c' 12. In accordance with Palm Desert Municipal Code Section 27.12.067 prior to issuance of grading permits associated with this project an erosion control plan shall be submitted to the director of public works for review and approval. If mass grading of the site is proposed, those areas graded but not under construction shall be planted with a natural desert vegetation mix and properly irrigated to prevent blowing dust or sand. 13. The applicant shall provide for the installation of landscaping in the existing median island in Cook Street and Frank Sinatra Drive along the property frontage. Landscape plans for the subject installation shall be reviewed and approved by the public works department prior to any installation. 14. Traffic safety striping shall be provided to the specifications of the Director of Public Works. A traffic control plan must be submitted to, and approved by, the director of public works prior to the placement of any pavement markings. 15. Full improvements of interior streets based on residential street standards in accordance with Section 26.40 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code shall be provided. 16. Complete tract map shall be submitted as required by ordinance to the director of public works for checking and approval and be recorded before issuance of any permits. 17. Any and all offsite improvements shall be preceded by the approval of plans and the issuance of valid encroachment permits by the department of public works. 18. A complete preliminary soils investigation, conducted by a _-registered soils engineer, shall be submitted to and approved by the department of public works prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 19. Pad elevations, as shown on the tentative map are subject to review and modification in accordance with Chapter 27 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code. 20. Property lines for the individual lots proposed by this subdivision shall be located at tope of slope where applicable. 21. As required under Section 12.16 and Section 26.44 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code, all existing utilities shall be wed per each respective utility districts recommendation. If determined to be unfeasible, applicant shall agree to participate in any future utility district. 5 R PLANNim cm-nsSION Fasaum N NO. 1364 22. As required by Sections 26.32 and 26.40 of the .Palm Desert Municipal Code, and in accordance with the Circulation Network of the City's General Plan, dedication of half-street right-of-way at 55 feet on Cook Street and Frank Sinatra Drive shall be provided on the final map. 23. Applicant shall agree to contribute their fair share to the assessed costs for the Cook Street Mrtensicn, Interstate 10 interchange and Bridge Fund. Riverside County NYre Department: 1. The fire department is required to set a m;n;mem, fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commercial buildings per Uniform Fire Code Sec. 10.301C. 2. Provide or show there exists a water system capable of providing a potential fire flaw of 1500 gpn and the actual fire flow available, from any one hydrant connected to any given water main shall be 1500 gpn for 2 hours duration at 20 psi residual operating pressure. ' 3. A fire flow of 1500 gpm for a 2 hour duration at 20 psi residual operating pressure moist be available before any combustible material is placed on the job site. 4. The required fire flaw shall be available from a Super hydrant(s) (6" x 4" x 2-1/2" x 2-1/2"), located not less than 25' nor more than 200' from any portion of the building(s) as measured along approved vehicular travelways. Hydrants installed below 3000' elevation shall be of the "wet barrel" type. 5. Prior to the application for a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and two copies of the water system plan to the county fire department for review. No building permit shall_be issued until the water system plan has been approved by the county fire chief. Upon approval, the original will be returned. One copy will be sent to the responsible inspecting authority. 6. Plans shall conform to fire hydrant types, location and spacing, and the system shall meet the fire flaw requirements. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and may be signed by the local water company with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Riverside Country Fire Department-" 7. Certain designated areas will be required to be maintained as fire lanes. B. Whenever access into private property is controlled through use of gates, barriers, guard houses or similar means, provision shall be made to facilitate access by emergency vehicles in a manner approved by the fire 6 11t PLmND G ow4mIw RE4ounim No. 1364 department. All controlled access devices that are power operated shall have a radio-oontrolled over-ride system capable of opening the gate when activated by a special transmitter located in emergency vehicles. Devices shall be equipped with backup power facilities to operate in the event of power failure. All controlled access devices that are not power operated shall also be appxvved by the fire department. Minimum opening width shall be 12' with a minimum vertical clearance of 1316". 9. Contact the fire department for a final inspection prior to occupancy. SRS/tm 7 NEW OONDITIO S TT 24530 Community Development Conditions: -- Delete Condition #5. -- NEW CONDITION #5: Minimum setback for lots with single story dwellings shall be: Front 20 feet Rear 20 feet Sides 15 feet total, minimum 7 feet. 9. Minimum setbacks for lots with two story dwellings shall be: Front 20 feet Rear 20 feet Sides 20 feet total, minimum 8 feet. 10. Maximum coverage limit for this development shall be 30% of lot area except for lots having lot area of 10,250 square feet or less which shall have a maximum coverage limit of 35%. CITY OF PALM DESERT DEPARTMENT OF MMINITY DEVELa"ENNP STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission DATE: July 5, 1989 CASE NO: TT 24530 REQUEST: Approval of a tentative tract map subdividing 90 acres of PR-5 zoned land located south and west of Frank Sinatra and Cook Streets into 277 single family lots having minimum lot sizes of 10,000 square feet and minimum widths of 80 feet. APPLICANT: Baron's Financial Group Bein/Frost 69-730 Highway ill, Suite 212 Charles Haver Division Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 74-390 Highway ill Palm Desert, CA 92260 I. BACKGFDU D: A. DESCRIPTION OF SITE: The site is an "L" shaped, vacant 90 acre property which slopes from northwest to southeast; B. ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE: North: R-1-M/Vacant South PR-10/Vacant East: PR-3/Desert Falls West: R-1-M/Vacant C. ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: The site is zoned PR-5, five dwelling units per acre and the general plan designation is residential low density (3-5 dwelling units per acre). The zoning is consistent with the general plan. D. ZONE REQUIREMENTS: The PR zone allows density to be determined based on gross acreage and hence a total of 450 units could be permitted (90 acres x 5 units/acre). The PR zone establishes basic requirements as follows: Code Requirements Proposed Perimeter setback 20' from public street 38' Max. building coverage 40% 37-W STAFF REPORT TT 24530 JULY 5, 1989 Code Requirements Proposed Min. lot area As approved 10,000 sq. ft. Front, side rear yards As approved 20, 5, 20 Min. separation between single family detached units 10' 10' Max. building height 30' - two story 24' max. Private road street width 30' , 321, 40' 36' & 42' In addition, section 25.24.190 permits oomussion to , impose such conditions it deems necessary to carry out the general purpose of the section. In other single family developments in the PR zone the city has applied the basic R-1 zone standards. This proposal varies from the R-1 standards in that one third of the units will be 2 story (minimmnn 200 feet from public streets) 24 feet in height, side yards will be reduced to 5 feet, coverage proposed at 37% whereas 30% is typical for lots in excess of 10,000 square feet. II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LAYOUT: The proposal is to create 277 single family lots having minimum lot areas of 10,000 square feet (for an overall density of 3.07 lots per acre). The average lot size .will be 11,350 square feet. The development has one access point onto Cook Street and one onto Frank Sinatra Drive. This will be a walled, gated development with privately owned and maintained streets. The main streets in the project will be 42 feet with curb to curb and the lower use streets 36 feet curb to curb. The applicant indicates that the hones will range from 1850 to 3000 square feet plus two and three car garages. One third of the units will be 2 story (24 feet maximum). These two story units will be at least 200 feet from either public street and, in addition, the second stories will be stepped back from the first floor front wall in order to reduce the mass when viewed from the street. III. AREAS OF OMXERN• A. TWO STORY HCMES: This development will be the first two-story single family subdivision in the city. The applicant indicates that there will be no two story units within 200 feet of a public street. Commission may wish to prohibit two story units of any lot which is adjacent to 2 1 STAFF REPORT TT 24530 JULY 5, 1989 the perimeter of the property. While the properties on all sides are zoned PR and could request two story approval, two story developments are the exception and not the rule and, of course, the city could condition those developments similarly. B. SIDE YARD SETBACKS: The zone requirement is for 10 feet of separation between buildings. The applicant is proposing 10 feet of separation (5 feet on each lot). This minimal an►xmt of distance is of concern to staff because it is only 50% of what is required in the basic R-1 10,000 zone (i.e. : 20 feet total, minimum of 8 feet) and it must be kept in mind that the R-1 zone limits hones to single story. Staff cannot support two- story (24' high) hones with 5 foot side yard setbacks. C. PROPOSED COVERAGE: The applicant is proposing up to 37% lot coverage. The R-1, 10,000 zone limit is 30%. If we increase the side yards to total 20 feet, as recommended in B above, then the 30% coverage limit would likely be the maximum attainable (i.e. : 10,000 square foot lot would allow 3000 square feet of covered area) (average lot area is 11,350 square feet would permit 3405 square feet of coverage). Therefore, by placing the 3000 square foot hones on the larger lots, the 30% lot coverage limit should not be a problem. D. LOT 5 AND 218 "PARK AND RETENTION": Lot 218 is a 65,900 square foot parcel labeled "Park and Retention". Lot 5 is 35,100 square feet and labeled "Landscape and Retention". Just for the clarification of the applicant the city is not interested nor will it accept the dedication of either of these sites for a city park or retention basin nor will either be credited toward this map's required park fees. IV. ANALYSIS: A. FINDINGS NEEDED FOR APPROVAL OF THE TENTATIVE TRACT MAP: 1. That the proposed map is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. 3 o 1 STAFF REPORT TT 24530 JULY 5, 1989 Justification: The proposed map is consistent with the zoning and the zoning is consistent with the general plan. Compliance with the conditions and mitigation measures will assure consistency with the general plan. 2. That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. Justification: All public streets will be dedicated and improved and sufficient drainage facilities will be provided in conformance with the general plan guidelines and city ordinances. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the type of development. Justification: The 90 acre site is of sufficient size to accmviodate the Proposed Project and the topography of the site does not create significant problems. 4. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development. Justification: The design of the project indicates that the site is suitable for the proposed density of development because the site can be served by respective utilities and, as conditioned, to provide full traffic circulation and is designed in compliance with all city codes. 5. The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. Justification: The design will not cause substantial environmental damage or injure fish or wildlife or their habitat because it will be constricted in compliance with applicable regulations and the proposed negative declaration has determined that there will be no related adverse environmental effect which cannot be mitigated. 4 . t STAFF REPORT TT 24530 JULY 5, 1989 6. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems. Justification: ' The design will not cause serious public health problems because it will be in compliance with applicable health, safety and building codes. 7. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. Justification: There are no easements acquired by the public at large for access or use of property within the proposed subdivision. The map has been designed to share a street access from Frank Sinatra with the property to the west. B. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements Will not restrict solar access to the property. Justification: The project has been designed to conform to code requirements and will not impact solar access to adjacent properties and will Provide adequate solar access to this property. V. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The director of sty development has determined that the proposed project will not have a significant effect on the environment and a negative declaration of environmental impact has been prepared. VI. RECZU44ENIDATICN• A. Adoption of the findings. B. Adoption of Planning Commission Resolution No. approving TT 24530, subject to conditions. VII. ATTACHMENTS: l A. Draft resolution. B. Legal notice. 5 1 STAFF REPORT TT 24530 JULY 5, 1989 C. Negative declaration. D. Plans and exhibits. Prepared by Reviewed and Approved by /tm 1 6 PLANNI M CONMISSI(N RESCI1rION No. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING CaN1 IISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP TO SUBDIVIDE 90 GROSS ACRES INTO 277 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS, LOCATED SOUTH AND WEST OF FRANK SINATRA DRIVE AND COOK STREET, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS APN 620-190-006-009; 011; 013; 014; 017. CASE NO. TT 24530 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 5th day of July, 1989, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider the request of BARON'S FINANCIAL GROUP for the above mentioned project; and WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedure for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 80-89, " in that the director of conuunity development has determined that the project will not have a significant impact on the environment and a negative declaration has been prepared; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said planning camussion did find the following facts and reasons as justified in the staff report for TT 24530 dated July 5, 1989, on file in the m department of cc mziity development, to exist to approve the tentative tract map: (a) That the proposed map is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. (b) That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. (c) That the site is physically suitable for the type of development. (d) That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development. (e) That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. (f) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems. (g) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. WHEREAS, in the review of this tentative tract map the planning commission has considered the effect of the contemplated action on the housing needs of the region for purposes of balancing these needs against the public service needs of the residents of the City of Palm Desert and its environs, with available fiscal and environmental resources. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVPION NO. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the commission in this case. 2. That it does hereby approve the above described Tentative Tract Map No. TT 24530 for the reasons set forth in this resolution and subject to the attached conditions. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Cb mission, held on this 5th day of July, 1989, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: • RICHARD ERWOOD, Chairman, ATTEST: RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary /tm c 2 PLANNIM CCMnSSICN RESOLUTION NO. CONDMONS OF APPRWAL CASE NO. TT 24530 Department of ComUnity Development/Pl.arm=m: 1. The development of the property shall conform substantially with exhibits on file with the department of community development/planning, as modified by the following conditions. 2. Construction of a portion of said project shall commence within one year from the date of final approval unless an extension of time is granted; otherwise said approval shall become null, void and of no effect whatsoever. 3. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein which are in addition to all municipal ordinances and state and federal statutes now in force, or which hereafter may be in force. 4. Prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contemplatedby this approval the applicant shall first obtain permits and/or clearance from the followingagencies: Coachella Valley Water District Palm Desert Architectural Commission City Fire Marshal Public Works Department Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to the department of building and safety at the time of issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. That the setbacks and coverage limits for single family dwellings in this project shall be as required in the R-1 zone for 10,000 square foot minimum lot area as prescribed in section 25.16.060 of the zoning ordinance. 6. That the applicant submit and receive approval of the architectural review oomLissicn of a landscape and wall plan. 7. That the two story dwelling units be limited to lots 166 thru 170, 175 thru 217, 219 thru 280, 53 thru 58, 63 thru 69, 74 thru 81, 86 thru 93, and 97 thru 100. 8. The maximum number of two story units permitted will be 91 units. (/ \ 1 PLANNIMu CCFMISSICN RESOLUTICN ND. Deparment of Public Works: 1. Drainage fees, in accordance with Section 26.49 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code and Palm Desert Ordinance Number 507, shall be paid prior to recordation of final map. 2. Drainage facilities shall be provided, per Ordinance No. 218 and the Northside Area Drainage Master Plan, to the specifications of the director of public works. 3. Storm drain construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study Prepared by a registered civil engineer that is reviewed and approved by the department of public works prior to start of construction. 4. Signalization fees, in accordance with City of Palm Desert Resolution Nos. 79-17 and 79-55, shall be paid prior to recordation of final map. 5. Full public improvements, as required by Sections 26.40 and 26.44 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code, shall be installed in accordance with applicable city standards. 6. As required under Palm Desert Municipal Code Section 26.28, and in accordance with Section 26.28, and in accordance with Sections 26.40 and 26.44, complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted to the director of public works for checking approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. Offsite improvement plans to be approved by the public works department and a surety posted to guarantee the installation of required offsite improvements prior to recordation of final map. Such offsite improvements shall include, but not be limited to, curb and gutter, asphalt paving and concrete sidewalk in an appropriate size and configuration and provisions for deceleration lanes at the all project entry points. "As-built" plans shall be submitted to, and approved.by, the director of public works prior to acceptance of the tents by the city. 7. Improvement plans for water and sewer systems shall be approved by the respective service districts with "as-built" plans submitted to the department of public works prior to project final. 8. All public improvements shall be inspected by the department of public works and a standard inspection fee shall be paid prior to issuance of grading permits. 9. Landscaping maintenance on Cook Street and Frank Sinatra Drive shall be provided by the homeowners association. 10. Waiver of access to Cook Street and Frank Sinatra except at approved locations shall be granted on the final map. 4 PLANNDU OOMMISSION RESOL TPICN NO. 11. In accordance with Palm Desert Municipal Code Section 26.44, complete grading plans and specifications shall be submitted to the director of public works for checking and approval prior to issuance of any permits. 12. In accordance with Palm Desert Municipal Code Section 27.12.067 prior to issuance of grading permits associated with this project an erosion control plan shall be submitted to the director of public works for review and approval. If mass grading of the site is proposed, those areas graded but not under construction shall be planted with a natural desert vegetation mix and properly irrigated to prevent blowing dust or sand. 13. The applicant shall provide for the installation of landscaping in the existing median island in Cook Street and Frank Sinatra Drive along the property frontage. Landscape plans for the subject installation shall be reviewed and approved by the public works department prior to any installation. 14. Traffic safety striping shall be provided to the specifications of the Director of Public Works. A traffic control plan must be submitted to, and approved by, the director of public works prior to the placement of any pavement markings. 15. Full improvements of interior streets based on residential street standards in accordance with Section 26.40 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code shall be provided. 16. Complete tract map shall be submitted as required by ordinance to the director of public works for checking and approval and be recorded before issuance of any permits. 17. Any and all offsite improvements shall be preceded by the approval of plans and the issuance of valid encroachment permits by the department of public works. 18. A complete preliminary soils investigation, conducted by a registered soils engineer, shall be submitted to and approved by the department of public works prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 19. Pad elevations, as shown on the tentative map are subject to review and modification in accordance with Chapter 27 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code. 20. Property lines for the individual lots proposed by this subdivision shall be located at tope of slope where applicable. 21. As required under Section 12.16 and Section 26.44 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code, all existing utilities shall be undergrounded per each 5 PLANNING CCWISSICN PESOUYrICN NO. respective utility districts recommendation. If determined to be unfeasible, applicant shall agree to participate in any future utility undexgrounding district. 22. As required by Sections 26.32 and 26.40 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code, and in accordance with the Circulation Network of the City's General Plan, dedication of half-street right-of-way at 55 feet an Cook Street and Frank Sinatra Drive shall be provided on the final map. 23. Applicant shall agree to contribute their fair share to the assessed costs for the Cook Street Extension, Interstate 10 interchange and Bridge Fluid. Riverside County Fire Deparbnant: 1. The fire department is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commercial buildings per Uniform Fire Code Sec. 10.301C. 2. Provide or show there exists a water system capable of providing a potential fire flow of 1500 gPn and the actual fire flow available from any one hydrant connected to any given water main shall be 1500 gpm for 2 hours duration at 20 psi residual operating pressure. 3. A fire flow of 1500 gpm for a 2 hour duration at 20 psi residual operating pressure must be available before any combustible material is placed on the job site. 4. The required fire flow shall be available from a Super hydrant(s) (6" x 4" x 2-1/2" x 2-1/2"), located not less than 25' nor more than 200' from any portion of the building(s) as measured along approved vehicular travelways. Hydrants installed below 3000' elevation shall be of the "wet barrel" type. 5. Prior to the application for a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and two copies of the water system plan to the county fire department for review. No building permit shall be issued until the water system plan has. been approved by the county fire chief. Upon approval, the original will be returned. One copy will be sent to the responsible inspecting authority. 6. Plans shall conform to fire hydrant types, location and spacing, and the system shall meet the fire flow requirements. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and may be signed by the local water company with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Riverside Country Fire Department." 7. Certain designated areas will be required to be maintained as fire lanes. 6 PLAMING COM IISSIM RESOIUMN NO. 8. Whenever access into private property is controlled through use of gates, barriers, guard houses or similar means, provision shall be made to facilitate access by emergency vehicles in a manner approved by the fire department. All controlled access devices that are power operated shall have a radio-controlled over-ride system capable of opening the gate when activated by a special transmitter located in emergency vehicles. Devices shall be equipped with backup power facilities to operate in the event of power failure. All controlled access devices that are not power operated shall also be approved by the fire department. Minimum opening width shall be 12' with a minimum vertical clearance of 13'6". 9. Contact the fire department for a final inspection prior to occupancy. /tn 7 INITIAL STUDY CASE NO. TT 24530 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION CHEMIST CCMMnS AND POSSIBLE MITIGATION MEASURES (CATEGORIES PERTAIN TO ATTACHED CI EMIST) 1. EARTH a. The project will result in grading. Said grading will not result in any alterations to geologic substructures nor create unstable earth conditions in that all grading will be pursuant to the grading ordinance. b. As part of the normal grading activity soil will be moved, displaced, over-covered and compacted. This activity will be done per permit and approved grading plans to assure that the site is properly prepared for the structural development which will take place on the site. C. The site slopes from northwest to southeast and changes in topography and surface relief will be required to assure proper drainage and avoid increased runoff to adjoining properties. The after ocnditicn of the property will result in less water runoff from the property to adjoining properties, and better direction. d. The site does not contain any unique geologic or physical features. e. The project as stated previously will result in less potential water damage to the site, through proper grading resulting in the appropriate directing of runoff from the site. Mitigation Measures The City of Palm Desert grading and building permits procedures require detailed geotechnical reports addressing grading specifications and the settlement and expansive characteristics of on-site soils. All structures must be designed by UBC requirements to insure that the buildings are constructed within the acceptable level of risk set forth therein for the type of building and occupancies being developed. 2. AIR a. During construction, particularly grading, a potential dust problem will be a short-term impact. Requiring that the ground be moistened during days in which grading occurs will mitigate this problem. This is required by City of Palm Desert Grading Ordinance. Because the site is already an urbanized setting its development will not result in an overall deterioration of ambient air quality. This conclusion is supported by the discussions relating to air quality contained in a 1985 draft environmental impact report prepared for INITIAL STUDY TT 24530 the City of Rancho Mirage by Michael Brandnan Associates entitled "Park View Drive Land Use Study". b. The .proposed development does not call for any odorous land uses. C. Development of this site will not result in any climatic changes. This is due to its size and identified uses. 3. WATER a. Water will be redirected to drainage facilities designed and constructed to accept the water from the site. b. The site will absorb less water due to ground coverage. The landscaped areas will absorb water because of the plant material. The alterations in drainage patterns will result in a benefit to adjoin;ng property as it will be directed in a control manner. C. See b. d. There is no ground water present on the site. e. See d. f. While any development results in the use of water and, therefore, reduces the amount otherwise available for public water supplies; the Coachella Valley Water District assures that there is sufficient water supplies to acccRmodate this growth. 4. PLANT LIFE a. The project when completed will introduce a diversity of species to the site. The plants that will be introduced to the site will, however, be material previously used in the desert. b. The site does not contain any unique, rare or endangered species of plant life. C. It is extremely doubtful that the project will introduce any new species into the area. In any event the landscape plan will be reviewed by the architectural inspector of Riverside County to assure that the plants being used do not pose a hazard to agricultural production in the area. 2 INITIAL STUDY TT 24530 5. ANIMAL LIFE a. The project will not increase or decrease the variety of animal life on the site. b. The site does contain habitat for the fringe-toed lizard, an endangered specie. As mitigation the applicant will be required to pay $600 per acre to the Nature Conservancy for use in acquiring habitat area north of I-10. C. See b and c. d. The project site is an in-fill site and not a suitable habitat for wildlife. 6. NATURAL RESOURCES a. The project will obviously use natural resources, but will not increase the rate of usage of these resources. b. All material resources used on the site are renewable. 7. a. & b. No more than normal usage. In addition, since the project will be required to ocrrply with the most current state energy codes, energy usage will be less than on previous projects of a similar nature. 8. The site does not contain any substances that could result in explosion or escape of hazardous materials. 9. a. As discussed earlier the project will have a positive impact in terms of drainage impacts on adjacent properties. b. Properties in the area are not subject to unusual geologic hazards. The project will not effect that hazard. 10. NOISE Construction and subsequent use as single family dwellings will increase ambient noise level. The increase will not create a long term annoyance to the adjacent residential properties. Mitigation Measures Strict adherence to construction hours and days will be required. 3 INITIAL STUDY TT 24530 11. LAND USE The project will not alter the present developed land use in the area. The planned land use for the area is identified as low density residential; the project would develop land uses permitted in the low density residential land use designation (5 du/acre). 12. OPEN SPA( The site in question is designated as low density residential; its development, therefore, will not result in a reduction in the amount of designated open space. Park fees collected from this development will be used to purchase park land or develop park land to serve this area. 13. POPULATION a. Developing single family lots in the area designated low density residential will not result in changes in location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the city's population. b. The project will not generate changes in the socio-economic characteristics of the area. 14. EMPLOYMENT While the project will provide a number of new jobs in terms of the value as a whole, in and of itself, it is minor. Most of the jobs created: gardeners, pool maintenance and other service personnel, however, will be filled by residents of the area or those who have cane to the valley for other reasons. 15. HOUSING a. The project will not change the housing picture in the community or region. This is based on the conclusions reached in items 13 and 14. b. None - covered in item 15 a. 16. TRANSPORTATION/cIRGULATION a. Projected trip generation per single family dwelling unit per day is 10 for a total of 2760 trip ends per day. As part of the conditions of approval the applicant shall be required to provide road improvements as provided by the circulation element of the general plan. 4 INITIAL STUDY TT 24530 b. All new single family dwellings are re 'red to provide two covered parking spaces as well as on-street and driveway parking. C. Except for additional vehicular movements discussed above the project should not generate additional demands on existing transportation systems. In addition these systems have additional capacity to accept the traffic these projects will create. d. Principal access to the area will be via Frank Sinatra Drive and Cook. Street. e. Implementation of the mitigation measures set forth by item 16a should result in positive impacts. 17. PUBLIC SERVICE a-f. None. The property is presently vacant. A ocnmitment to urban uses was made as the area surrounding the study area has been developed, and the general plan and zoning maps designated the area for residential development. Infrastructure improvements (i.e. : streets and utilities) have been made and are adequate to serve the proposed development. The proposed land uses would increase the economic productivity of the land in terms of land efficiency and greater economic return generated from these uses, versus the current state of the land. 18. PUBLIC FISCAL BALANCE The project will result in a net increase on fiscal flow to the City of Palm Desert through an increase in the assessed value of the land. 19. UTILITIES All utilities have indicated an ability to serve the proposed development. 20. HUMAN HEALTH The project will not create hazard to human health in the long or short term nor will it impact the level of community health. 21. SOCIAL SERVICES The property will be developed with single family dwellings and apartments. Owners of these homes will pay substantial amounts of property tax and generally have a low incidence of use of social services. Any increase in the demand for general social services will be minimal , 5 INITIAL STUDY TT 24530 22. AESTHETICS a. The city grading ordinance and architectural review process take into account the effects development may have on adjacent properties and the views available fran public streets. Care will be taken to assure that any impact on views from adjacent properties or scenic vistas will be minimized, b. The proposed single family dwellings must be approved by the Palm Desert Architectural review process. C. For masons stated .in items 22 a and b. 23. LIGHT AND GLARE a. New light will be produced but the effects will be minimal. 24. There has been no evidence of any archeological or historical significance of this site. In addition, state law requires that should any evidence be found during construction, construction must cease and the site cleared. 25. Because of the mitigation measures identified herein and required of the project, the proposal will not have a significant adverse impact on the environment. SRS/tm 6 CnJ` :v0 . 77 E,YVIRON3ffVT3L SERVICES DEPT . IYITIAL STUDY = VIROITIMNTAL EVALTJATI0Pi CRECKLIST NOTE: The availability of data necessary to address the topics listed below shall form the basis of a decision as to whether the application is considered complete for purposes of environmental assessment. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers , possible mitigation measures and comments are provided on attached sheets) . Yes Maybe No 1 . Earth. Will the proposal result in: V - a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? / . b. Oisruptions , displacements , compaction, or ✓— overcovering of the soil? c. Change in topography or ground surface relief / features? — — — d. The destruction, covering,, or modification / of any unique geologic or physical features? — — —✓ e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? — — 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? — — — b. The creation of objectionable odors? — c. Alteration of air movement, moisture , or temperature , or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? — — Yes Maybe No 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: a. NC nges. in currents , 'or the course or 1 ` direction of water' movements? b. Changes in-absorption Fatal, drainage patterns, or the rate and- amount of surface water runaff? c. Alterations to the course or flow of / flood waters? _ V d. Alteration of .the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? e. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or with- drawals, or through interception of an / aquifer by cuts or excavations? _ V_ f. Reduction in the amount of water other- wise available for public water supplies? a. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of. species , or numbers of any species of plants ( including trees , shrubs , grass , and / crops )? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or endangered species of plants? c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area , or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? , S. Animal. Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds , land animals including reptiles , or insects)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, ✓ rare, or endangered species of animals? c. Introduction of new species of animals Into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d. Oeterioration to existing wildlife haWtai•7 -- 3. Yes Ma`be No. 5. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in :.the rate of use of any natural resources? b. repletion of any non-renewable natural — — resource? — 7. Energy. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? b. Oemand upon existing sources of energy, or re- quire the.deselopment of new sources of / energy? 1/ S. Risk of Uoset. . roes the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of , hazardous substances ( including, but not limited to, pesticides ,' oil , chemicals , or radiation) in / the event of an accident or upset conditions? _ 9. E^anomie Loss. Will the proposal result in: a. A change in the value of property and improvements endangered by flooding? _ 1/ b. A change in the value of property and impro•,ements exposed to geologic hazards / beyond accepted comrunity risk standards? _ _ 10. Noise . Will the proposal increase existing noise levels to the point at which accepted community noise and vibration levels are / exceeded? V 11 . Land use. Will the proposal result in the as t-T oration of the present developed or / planned land use of an area? r/ 12. Ooen Space. Will the proposal land to a decrease in the !emount of designated open / space? V 13. Population. Will the proposal result in: a. Alteration or the location, distribution , density , or growth rate of the human population of the City? b. Change in the population distri`-ition by aye , income, religion, racial , ethnic / group, occupational class , housenold type? v 4. Yes Mavbe No 14. Emoloyment. Will the proposal result in additions new long-term jobs provided, or a change in the number and per cent employed, unemployed, and underemployed? 15. Housing. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in number and per cent of housing units by type (price or rent range, zoning category, owner-occupied and rental , etc. ) relative to demand or to number of families in various income classes in the City? b. Impacts on existing housing or creation of a demand for additional housing? 16. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result .in: a. Generation of additional vehicular movement? V b. Effects on existing parking facilities , or / demand for new parking? _ — —✓ c. Impact upon existing transportation systems? _ d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation / or mcvement of people and/or goods? e. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, / bicyclists , or pedestrians? _ _ — 17 . Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for, new or altered governmental services in any of the following areis: a. Fire protection? b. Police protection? - Y/ c. Schools? d. Parks or other recreational facilities? e. Maintenance of public facilities , including ✓ roads? — — —/ f. Other governmental services? 5. Yes Maybe No 18. Public Fiscal Balance. Will the proposal result in a net change in government fiscal flow (revenues less operating expenditures and annualized capital expenditures)? 19. Util"ities . . _ Will the proposal result in a need for new systems , or alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? i/ b. Communications system? ,/ c. Water? _ d. Sewer or septic tanks? / e. Storm water drainage? f. Solid waste and disposal ? 20. Human Health. Will the proposal result in: ' a. The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? b. A change in the level of community health care provided? 21 . Social Seriices. Will the proposal result in _ an increased demand for provision of general / social services? V/ 22. Aesthetics . Will the proposal result in: a. Obstruction of any Scenic vista• or view ✓ open to the public? b. The creation of .an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? c. Lessening of the overall neighborhood (or area ) attractiveness, pleasantness , and uniqueness? 23. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce — — ne:r lignt or glare? N. Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal resu t in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, / object, or building? �/ Yes Maybe No 25. Mandatory Findings of Siani� icance. a. Oaes the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment or to curtail the diversity in the environment? _ b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental .goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in ,a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into ! / the future. ) _ t—/ c. Does the project have impacts which are indi - vidually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small , but where the effect of the total of those impacts an the environment / is significant. ) _ _ 1—/ d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings , either directly or indirectly? Initial Study Prepared By: i TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 24530 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Proposed Usage: Development of 276 single-family, detached homes on 90 acres of land fronting on Cook and Frank Sinatra Streets. Existing Zoning: Planned Residential, five units per acre (PR-5) . Density: Proposed density is 3 .07 lots per acre. Lot Size and Configuration: Minimum net lot size is 10, 000 square feet, based on design criterion of 80 feet x 125 feet. Average (mean) lot size is 11, 350 square feet. Streets: Streets will be privately owned and maintained within the walled, gated development. Proposed Structures: Size: Houses sizes will be from 1, 850 to 3, 000 square feet of net livable area, and most will have three-car garages. Stories: one-third of the houses will be two-story, which will not exceed 24 feet in height and will not be built within 200 feet of the public streets. The second stories will be set back from the front line of the first stories to eliminate vertical appearance. Exterior Features: All homes will have tile roofs, plastered walls (desert colors) , landscaped front yards, lighted parkway trees, and fenced or walled rear and side yards. Lot Coverage: The footprint of the house and three-car garage will cover less than 37% of the lot. Set-backs: The front and rear set-backs will be a minimum of 20 feet, while the minimum distance between side walls will be 10 feet. Pricing: The homes will be priced from $165, 000 to $275, 000. Phasing: The property will be developed in twenty-acre phases, beginning at the Cook Street entrance, with each phase containing approximately 62 homes. I v i INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Department of Community Development/Planning Attention: Steve Smith FROM: Richard J. Folkers, Asst . City Manager/Public Works Director SUBJECT: TENTATIVE TRACT 24530, BARON'S FINANCIAL GROUP DATE: ,Inu1, ^•I , 1989 The following should be. considered conditions of approval for the above- referenced project : (1) Drainage fees, in accordance with Section 26.49 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code and Palm Desert Ordinance Number 507, shall be paid prior to recordation of final. map. ( ) Drainage facilities shall he provided, per Ordinance No. 218 and the 9orthside Area Drainage Master Plan, to the specifications of the Director of Public Works . (1) .^,torn) drain f oustructio6 shall be contingent upon a drainage study prepared by a registered civil engineer that is reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works prior to start of construction. (1) Signali.zation fees, in accordance with City of Palm Desert Resolution Nos. 79-17 and 79 55, shall be paid prior to recordation of final map. (5) I'nll public improvements, as required by Sections 26.40 and 26.44 of the Palm Desert 'tuuicipal Code, shall be installed in accordance with applicable City standards . (6) As required ruder Palm Desert Municipal Code Section 26.28, and in accordance with Sections 26.40 and 26.44, complete improvement plans and :;pecifications shall be submitted to the Director of Public Works for checking approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. Oft site i.mprocpment pLnns to be approved by the Public Works Department and a surety posted to guarantee the installation of required offsite improvcanents prior to recordation of final map. Such offsite improvements shall include, but not be limited to, curb and gutter, asphalt- paving and concrete sidewalk in an appropriate size and configuration and provisions for deceleration/acceleration lanes at the all project entry points. "As- built" IIl•uns shall he submitted to, and approved by, the Director of Public Works prior to the acceptance of the improvements by the city. (7) improvement plans for water and sewer systems shall be approved by the respective service districts with "as-built" plans submitted to the Department of. Public Works prior to project final. (8) :All public and private improvements shall be inspected by the Department of Public Works and a standard inspection fee shall be paid prior to issuance of grayling permits. (9) L0ndscapin9 maintenance on Cook Street and Frank Sinatra Drive shall be provided by the homeowners association. (10) Waiver of access to Cook Street and Frank Sinatra except at approved locations shall be granted on the Final Map. (11) In accordance with Palm Desert Municipal Code Section 26.44, complete grading plans and specifications shall be submitted to the Director of Public Works for checking and approval prior to issuance of any permits. ( 12) In accordance with Palm Desert Municipal Code Section 27.12.067 prior to issuance of grading permits associated with this project an erosion control plan shall he submitted to the Director of Public Works for review and approval . If mass grading of the site is proposed, those areas graded but not under construction shall be planted with a natural desert vegetation mix and properly irrigated to prevent blowing dust or sand. GOf ( 17) The applicant shall provide foVthe c'STR EET installation of landscaping in the existing median isl,ind in �.xs�lab Drive and Frank Sinatra Drive along the property frontage. Landscape plans for the subject installation shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department prior to any installation. ( 14) Traffic safety striping shall be provided to the specifications of the Director of Public Works. A traffic control plan must be submitted to, and approved by, the Director of Public Works prior to the placement of any pavement markings. ( 15) Full improvements of interior streets based on residential street standards in accordance with Section 26.40 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code shall be provided. (16) Complete tract. map shall be submitted as required by ordinance to the Director of Public Works for checking and approval and be recorded before issuance of any permits. (17) Any and all off site improvements shall be preceded by the approval of plans and the issuance of valid encroachment permits by the Department of Public Works. (18) A complete preliminary soils investigation, conducted by a registered soils engineer, shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Department of Public Works prior to the issuance of a grading permit. (1 ?) Pad elevations, as shown on the tentative map are subject to review and modification in accordance with Chapter 27 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code. (20) Property lines for the individual lots proposed by this subdivision shall be located at top of slope where applicable. (21) As required under Section 12.16 and Section 26.44 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code, all existing utilities shall be undergrounded per each respective utility districts recommendation. If determined to be unfeasible, applicant shall agree to participate in any future utility undergrounding district . - (22) As required by Sections 26.32 and 26.40 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code, and in accordance with the Circulation Network of the City's General Plan, dedicatinn of half-street right -of-way at 55 feet on Cook Street- and Frank Sinatra Drive shall be provided on the final map. (23) Applicant shall agree to contribute their fair share of the assessed costs for the Cook Street Extension, Interstate 10 interchange and Bridge Fund. -- ---- -------------- ---- fV¢/RICHARD J. FOLKERS, F.E. IIs71tr29Sl0.i^=.I RIVERSIDE COUNTY "uv Of u"N1" ew_ lTl FIRE DEPARTMENT 4E', pEPPOT(C�"Ngy IN COOPERATION WITH THE ' SCOLNTY' ' CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY F FI e ---_ _ T AND FIRE PROTECTION C' T GLEN J. NEWMAN f FIRE CHIEF 210 WEST SAN JACINTO AVENUE PERRIS, CALIFORNIA 92370 TELEPHONE: (714) 657.3183 June 2. 1989 To: Ray Diaz, Dir. Comm. Dev. /Plannin_q Attn:Steve smith F.e : TT 24530 Barons- Financial Croup With respect to the conditions of approval regarding the above referenced the Fire Department recommends the following fire protection measures be provided in accordance with Uniform Fire Code and/or recognized Fire Protection Standards: The Fire Department is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commercial buildings per Uniform Fire Code Sec. 10. 301C. Provide, or show there exists a water system capable of providing a potential fire flow of 1500 gpm and the actual fire flow available from any one hydrant connected to any given water main shall be 1500 gpm for 2 hours duration at 20 psi residual operating pressure. A fire flow of 1500 gpm for a 2 hour duration at 20 psi residual operating pressure must be available before any combustible material is placed on the _lob site. The required fire flow shall be available from a Super hydrant (s) (6" x 4" x 2-112" x 2-1/2" ) , located not less than 25 ' nor more than 200 ' from any portion of the building(s) as measured along approved vehicular travelways. Hydrants installed below 3000 ' elevation shall be of the "wet barrel" type. Prior- to the application for a building permit , the developer shall furnish the original and two copies of the water system plan to the County Fire Department for review. No building permit shall be issued until the water system plan has been approved by the County Fire Chief. Upon approval , the original will be returned. One copy will be sent to the responsible inspecting authority. Plans shall conform to fire hydrant types, location and spacing, and the system shall meet the fire flow requirements. Plans shall be signed by a Registered Civil Engineer and may be signed by the local water company with the following certification: " I certify that the design of the water system is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Riverside County Fire Department . " Certain designated areas will be required to be maintained as fire lanes. Dead-end roads in excess of 150 ' shall be provided with a minimum 45 ' radius turn-around (55 ' in industrial develooments) . 4;?;enever access into private property is controlled through use of gates, barriers, guard houses or similar means, provision shall be made to facilitate access by emergency vehicles in a manner approved by the Fire Department . All controlled access devices that are power operated shall have a radio-controlled over-ride system capable of opening the gate when activated by a special transmitter located in emergency vehicles. Devices shall be equipped with backup power facilities to operate in the event of power failure. All controlled access devices that are not power operated shall also be approved by the Fire Department . Minimum openin4 width shall be 12 ' . with a minimum vertical clearance of 13 '6" . Contact the Fire Department for a final inspection prior to occupancy. All questions regarding the meaning of these conditions should be referred to the Fire Department Fire Protection/Inspection Staff. .Sincerely, GLEN II..EWTPN Ranger in Charge County Fire Chief Ay�-_ By Jim Reeder Fire Protection Specialist bbm CITY OF PALM DESERT INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Steve Smith FROM: Brent Conley RE: TT24530 DATE: June 1, 1989 The Police Department would like to see the entrance "A" Roadway be continued by moving lots 183 and 210 North, changing street "F" location to improve circulation. The Police Department reserves comment on particular units until submittal. If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to contact me a ext. 2 7, Brent Conley Crime Prevention Officer BC/rh W A7Eg,: - ESTABLISHED IN 1918 AS A PUBLIC AGENCY i COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT POST OFFIOE BOX 1058•COACHELLA, CALIFORNIA 92236•TELEPHONE(619)398-2651 DIRECTORS OFFICERS TELLISCODEKAS,PRESIDENT THOMASE.LEVY,GENERAL MANAGER CHIEFENGINEER RAYMOND R.RUMMONDS,VICE PRESIDENT - BERNARDINE SUTTON,SECRETARY DOROTH M.NCHOLS June 13, 1989 KEITH H.AINSW REDWINE AND SHERRILL,ATTORNEYS THEODORE J.FISH File: 0163.1 Department of Environmental Services�� Lj �,J City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, California 92260 Gentlemen: Subject: Tentative Tract 24530, Portion of Northeast Quarter, Section 4, Township 5 South, Range 6 East, San Bernardino Meridian This area lies on the sandy area in the northern portion of Palm Desert and is considered safe from stormwater flows except in rare instances. The district will furnish domestic water and sanitation service to this area in accordance with the current regulations of this district. These regulations provide for the payment of certain fees and charges by the subdivider and said fees and charges are subject to change. This area shall be annexed to Improvement District No. 70 of Coachella Valley Water District for domestic water service. The district will need additional facilities to provide for the orderly expansion of its domestic water system. These facilities may include wells, reservoirs and booster pumping stations. The developer will be required to provide land on which some of these facilities will be located. These sites shall be shown on the tract map as lots to be deeded to the district for such purpose. Plans for grading, landscaping, and irrigation systems shall be submitted to Coachella Valley Water District for review. This review is for ensuring efficient water management. If you have any questions please call Bob Meleg, stormwater engineer, extension 264. You s very truly, Tom Levy General Manager-Chief Engi eer RF:bg cc: Don Park Riverside County Department of Public Health ATION 46-209 Oasis Street TRUE WATERCONSE WISELY Indio, California 92201 USE WATER WISELY cP� a9-y G/Z 69-g MMIRON.L=TAL SERVICES DEPT . INITIAL STUDY Bi`iVIRONy[ENTAL EVALUATION CRECKLIST NOTE: The availability of data necessary to address the topics listed below shall form the basis of a decision as to whether the application is considered complete for purposes of environmental assessment. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers , possible mitigation measures and comments are provided on attached sheets) . Yes Maybe No 1 . Earth. Will the proposal result in: / a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? b. Oisruptions , displacements , compaction, or overcovering of the soil ? c. Change in topography or ground surface relief / features? d. The destruction, covering .. or modification / of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of / soils, either on or off the site? _ _ 1/_ 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air / quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors? _ c. Alteration of air movement, moisture , or temperature , or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? _ _ _ Yes Maybe No 3. water. will the proposal result in: a_. Changes. in currents, 'or the course or 1 direction of water" movements? _ _ _✓ ^ b. Changes in-absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and- amoUnt of / surface water runoff? c. Alterations to the course or flaw of / flood waters? V d. Alteration of .the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? _ e. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or with- drawals, or through interception of an / aquifer by cuts or excavations? f. Reduction in the amount of water other- / wise available for public water su;plies? 4. Plant life. will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of plants (including trees , shrubs , grass , and / crops )? 1/ b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique , rare, / or endangered species of plants? _ _ _I/ c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area , or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? S. Animal. Life. will the proposal result in: a. Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds , land animals including reptiles , or / insects)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, / rare, or endangered species of animals? c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to / the migration or movement of animals? _ _ 1/ � . d. Oeterioration to existing wildlife hob tat f Yes Ma`be No 6. Natural Resources . Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in -the rate of use of any natural resources? _ ✓ — b. Oepletion of any non-rene resource? wable natural 7. Eneray. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? _ b. Oemand upon existing sources of energy, or re- quire the.deselopment of new sources of energy? 8. Risk of Uoset. . Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of , hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, pesticides ,' oil , chemicals , or radiation) in / the event of an accident or upset conditions? 9. E-ononic Loss. Will the proposal result in: a. A change in the value of property and improvements endangered by flooding? _ b. A change in the value of property and improvements exposed to geologic hazards / beyond accepted community risk standards? _ 10. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels to the point at which accepted community noise and vibration levels are exceeded? 11 . Land Use. Will the proposal result in the a t-T oration of the present developed or planned land use of an area? 12. Ocen Soaee. Will the proposal lead to a decrease in the amount of designated open space? 13. Population. Will the proposal result in: a. Alteration or the location, distribution , density, or growth rate of the human / Population of the City? b. Change in the Population distribution by income , religion , racial , ethnic grow — — group , occupational class , househeh old type? 4. Yes Mavbe No 14. E�mol�o nennt�t. Will the proposal result in addition new long-term jobs provided, or a change in the number and per cent employed , unemployed, and underemployed?r. 15. Housing. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in number and per cent of housing units by type (price or rent range, zoning category, owner-occupied and rental , etc. ) relative to demand or to number of / families in various income classes in the City? _ V b. Impacts on existing housing or creation of a demand for additional housing? 16. Transoortation/Circulation. Will the proposal resu t tn: a. Generation of additional vehicular movement? _ b. Effects on existing parking facilities , or demand for new parking? _ — c. Impact upon existing transportation systems? _ d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? e. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , / bicyclists , or pedestrians? _ �/_ — 17 . Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon , or result in a need for, new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? b. Police protection? c. Schools? — d. Parks or other recreational facilities? e. Maintenance of public facilities , including roads? f. Other governmental services? _. J� Yes Maybe No 18. Public Fiscal Balance. Will the proposal result in a net change in government fiscal flow (revenues less operating expenditures / and annualized capital expenditures)? V 19. Utilities .. . Will the proposal result in a need for new systems , or alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? b. Communications system? v c. Water? d. Sewer or septic tanks? r/ e. Storm water drainage? _ L// f. Solid waste and disposal? 20. Human Health. Will the proposal result in: ' a. The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? b. A change in the level of community health care provided? 21 . Social Services. Will the proposal result in an increased demand for provision of general / social services? 22. Aesthetics . Will the proposal result in: a. Obstruction of any scenic vista. or view Y — open to the public? b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? — — c. Lessening of the overall neighborhood (or area ) attractiveness, pleasantness , / and uniqueness? 23. Licht and Glare. Will the proposal produce ne:v I fight or g are? 24. Archealooical/Historical . Will the proposal resu tin an a teration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object, or building? 6. Yes Maybe No 25. Mandatory Findings of Sionificance. a. Oces the- project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment or to curtail the diversity in the environment? b. Ooes the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental .goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into / the future. ) c. Oces the project have impacts which are indi- vidually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small , but where the effect of the total of those impacts an the environment is significant. ) d. Ooes the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings , either directly or indirectly? Initial Study Prepared By: I .N.t�"t,i,:rynlwl 1 l' 1 1 �- ��•,• C�ti�� off' �I1>� ���r�� 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 June IS, 1989 CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE CASE NO. TT 24530 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by BARON'S FINANCIAL GROUP for approval of a tentative tract map for 276 single family lots having minimum lot areas of 10,000 square feet and a minimum lot width of 80 feet on 90 acres of PR-5 zoned land located south and west of Frank Sinatra and Cook Streets, more Particularly described as: APN 620-190-006 through 009, 011 , 013, 014, 017 NORTH` :.: FRA h)F ,91h AT R'A'-O R1V� W _ 2 !i.. ..� R.-5 C: LL 4 - SUBJECT _ ,` ^ ' '_ sY ... P.R.-5 PROPERTY �"/^�?�-{,���J�•��_-lti» �,_�ei-mil_..a 4'"__'_'��.�11�=.1 I "'f /w.�(�I_h�I:If. 0 r P.R.-10 1 P.R.-3 P.R.-5 SAID Public hearing will be held on Wednesday, July 5, 1989, •at 7:00 p.m. In the Council Chamber at the Palm Desert Civic_ Center, 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all interested persons are Invited to attend and be heard. If you challenge the proposed actions in court, you may he limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public_ hearing described in this notice, or In written correspondence delivered to the planning commission (or city council ) at, or prior to, the public_ hearing. PUBLISH: Desert Post RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary June 23. 1989 Palm Desert Planning Commission 1 1 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 June 15, 1989 CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE CASE NO. TT 24530 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by BARON'S FINANCIAL GROUP for approval of a tentative tract map for 276 single family lots having minimum lot areas of 10,000 square feet and a minimum lot width of 80 feet on 90 acres of PR-5 zoned land located south and west of Frank Sinatra and Cook Streets, more particularly described as: APN 620-190-006 through 009, 011 , 013, 014, 017 SAID public hearing will be held on Wednesday, July 5, 1989, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber at the Palm Desert Civic Center, 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. If you challenge the proposed actions in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the planning commission (or city council ) at, or prior to, the public hearing. PUBLISH: Desert Post RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary June 23, 1989 Palm Desert Planning Commission I[Y[XIIIEIIT L� _ MN 653-RW-019 VAUNT w F[¢crtr a r[Er o¢xrr,cawn a w�ARsoc,mFc a crErrRw. ! b `"""-SKATFtW--fFTENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO, 24530 . -� w-RrY-1YRIYIq Y[ISOM[Y.RRR•gs sl-4w—RY Ewa111lYY[.Y[[ I 64 I tol _ � W fro YY Yr e[S � LT I �i � YIM�wY[I[.A�i[r0 Y[—YII YII VI b r I• _y F�y w • r=J I _ ..-.+emu mR f [N.S Ofl.r —.w.tR.wIA s[[.r[u[[rrne�rro usaa[rtt ID/ [RN[[[F!C[. . we.W W�E�rRVES YO ISSOCIYO PNFSN r[.r! '\' APAI /TIRE AlIARN/aC)Ww �� '1`�—• wws, 6PC/-I:U-05 V NT D .�-VfL GO ___01*1'5__-- a. COOK STREET EtfTRY _ U • Q•• APH ..s..m.Y..n.r. lea.n....- L � AY I 1lSfi�OR1WRVKEL�I-IM,FR N ••tbr w m 1RFvs" On -, � - _ „'a •• _ �' .,, e o + � ' w - �. ® z M 1 wcAwr MN 6W-em-Mv VACANT k 1 y - t APN 620-ZOO-OI6 MINUTES PAIM DESERT PLANNIIU OM"IISSICN JULY 5, 1989 Commissioner Richards asked about the height of the proposed building; Mr. Smith replied 14 feet. Action- Moved by Commissioner Downs, seconded by Commissioner Richards, approving the findings as presented by staff. Carried 4-0-1 (Commissioner Jonathan abstained). Moved by Commissioner Downs, seconded by Commissioner Richards, adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 1363, approving PP 89- 13, VAR 89-2 and associated street vacation, subject to conditions. Carried 4-0-1 (Commissioner Jonathan abstained). E. No. TT 24530 - aARON'S FIW NCIAL GROUP, Applicant Request for approval of a tentative tract map subdividing 90 acres of PR-5 zoned land located south and west of Frank Sinatra and Cook Streets into 277 single family lots having minimum lot sizes of 10,000 square feet and minimum widths of 80 feet. Mr. Smith outlined the salient points of the staff report. He stated the applicant was requesting 30g two story development and the conditions would reflect that and delineate specific lots. He indicated that condition no. 5 should be deleted and replaced with wording that minimum setbacks for lots with single story dwellings be front yard 20 feet, rear 20 feet, and sides totally 15 feet, minimum 7 feet. He added condition no. 9 that minimum setbacks for two story development be front 20 feet, rear 20 feet, and sides 20 feet total, minimum 8 feet and condition no. 10 that maximum coverage limit shall be 30% of lot area except for lots having lot area of 10,200 square feet or less which shall have maximum coverage limit of 35%. With those changes staff recommended approval. Commissioner Richards made note of the fact that the density would be 3.07, the road narrows from widths of 50-60' to 30' , would eliminate sidewalks, adds two stories, provides no parks and no obvious amenities. He indicated is objection with two story development had to do with single family development being more appealing aesthetically. Cc mmnissioner Jonathan shared most of Commissioner Richards concerns but felt two story should be allowed with detrimental aspects mitigated. He expressed concern regarding the sameness of all the 8 MLNMES PALM DESERT PLANNIM OavMSSICN JULY 5, 1989 units, the side setbacks, and streets should be wider with sidewalks. He felt greenbelts or scenic parks would be attractive. Chairman Erwood o the public testimony and asked the applicant to address the commission. MR. TCM LACIER, office manager for Charles Haver and Associates, pointed out that the streets were a minimum of 36 feet and the main street through the project would be 42 feet. The retention area in the center of the project would be improved as a green area for baseball, etc., but not accepted as a park but as usable space. He indicated 10,000 square feet would be the minimum lot size and the large lots were designed to have their awn swimming pools. He stated that the two story homes would be a minimum of 200 feet from the property boundary. Mr. Lagier informed coarnission that Richard Krotz was the owner and he was present to answer any questions. Chairman Erwood asked if anyone present wished to speak in EAvoR of the project. MR. RICHARD KROTZ emphasized that they were building to the market and there was a high demand for two story units. Chairman Erwood asked if anyone present wished to speak in opposITIm to the proposal. There being no one, the public testimony was closed. Commissioner Richards stated that he was opposed to two stories. Chairman Erwood agreed with Ccmnissioner Jonathan that there might be a market and if kept within the interior of the development and did not impact property outside this development, his concern was lessened. Commissioner Richards indicated that he did not want to set a precedent. Commissioner Jonathan stated that he would like to find a way to satisfy his concerns with a uniform ruling on two story setbacks or by this action, set a precedent for future development. He felt the project perimeter setback minimum should be considered, a set maximum Of percentage and appropriate setback from other properties should be determined. He felt that 20 feet was not much between two story structures and expressed' concern regarding privacy. Commissioner Richards indicated that this was a political issue that and council should give some direction. He stated that this developnent would provide single family development which the 9 DE24UIES PALM DESERT PUUOUNG O:ZMSSICN DULY 5, 1989 community wants, and he would go along with the plot map as it was providing staff work out details of what would be done with the retention/parkway area. Commissioner Whitlock also noted that this development was within the north sphere and would like some direction from council on two story development. Chairman Emwood noted there was the option of deleting the condition permitting two story development and if the developer wanted to appeal, it would go to council. Comussioner. Jonathan stated that he was opposed unless his other concerns were addressed and felt the project was too congested, more green areas were needed, and more of a break up in the raw of houses Should be incorporated into the design. Mr. Krotz stated that time was of the essence, understood the two story housing concerns, the talk about sidewalks and design was disturbing because he had done three major redesigns already; he suggested no sidewalks or possibly having a sidewalk on one side. Mr. Diaz noted that private streets in the past did not sidewalks. Mr. Gaugush clarified that there were no standards for private street development, but that. public sidewalks were six feet. Commissioner Jonathan that for him to approve the development he would like sidewalks on both sides of the street, wider streets, and greenbelts. e Mr. Diaz informed commission that greenbelts in private developments did not fall under the landscaping and lighting district act, but was strictly homeowners association and it would place additional expenses on the homeowners. Camcmussicn discussed deletion of condition nos. 7 and 8, and amending no. 5. Action: Moved by Commissioner Downs, seconded by CojnTLissioner Whitlock, approving the findings as presented by staff. Carried 4-1 (Commissioner Jonathan Voted no). Moved by Commissioner Downs, seconded by Commissioner Whitlock, adopting Planning Canmission Resolution No. 1364, approving TT 24530, 10 ay53� ` MINtTPES PALM DESERT PLANNIM COM-T1SSION JULY 5, 1989 subject to conditions as amended. Carried 4-1 (Commissioner Jonathan voted no). F. Case No. PP 89-8 - MIKE FEDDERLY, Applicant Request for approval of a precise plan of design for construction of a 10,500 square foot office building on the south side of Fred Waring Drive, 560 feet east of Monterey. Ms. Sass outlined the salient points of the staff report. Staff clarified that there would be ten covered parking spaces and sidewalks would be consistent with sidewalks along Fred Waring. Chairman Erwood opened the public testimony and asked if the applicant wished to address the commission. MR. RICHARD FISCHER, architect, stated he was present to answer any questions. Chairman Erwood asked if anyone present wished to speak in FAVOR or OPPOSITION to the proposal. MR. HURB KLINE, owner of the house behind the parking lot, spoke against traffic because of only one access. Commissioner Richards reviewed the implementation of the Palma Village plan and the hearings that had taken place. Upon request, staff clarified that setbacks between the building and property line would be 51 feet. Commissioner Whitlock asked if it would be possible to move the building forward to give more rear yard setback. Mr. Drell provided clarification regarding a sight study versus height that done. Commissioner Jonathan asked Mr. Kline if he would be in agreement if the building was shifted west and the parking lot were moved to the east. Mr. Kline replied yes, but he would prefer one story. MRS. BETTY KLINE addressed the caimission and stated that she would prefer residential development and felt there would be a problem with privacy. Chairman Erwood closed the public testimony. 11 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING OOhMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP TO SUBDIVIDE 90 GROSS ACRES INTO 277 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS, LOCATED SOUTH AND WEST OF FRANK SINATRA DRIVE AND COOK STREET, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS APN 620-190-006-009; 011; 013; 014; 017. CASE NO. TT 24530 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 5th day of July, 1989, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider the request of BARON'S FINANCIAL GROUP for the above mentioned project; and WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedure for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 80-89, " in that the director of community development has determined that the project will not have a significant impact on the environment and a negative declaration has been prepared; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said planning commission did find the following facts and reasons as justified in the staff report for TT 24530 dated July 5, 1989, on file in the department of conmxinity development, to exist to approve the tentative tract map: (a) That the proposed map is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. (b) That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. (c) That the site is physically suitable for the type of development. (d) That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development. (e) That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. (f) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems. (g) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. WHEREAS, in the review of this tentative tract map the planning commission has considered the effect of the contemplated action on the housing needs of the region for purposes of balancing these needs against the public service needs of the residents of the City of Palm Desert and its environs, with available fiscal and environmental resources. PLANNING COMISSION RESOLUTION NO. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the commission in this case. 2. That it does hereby approve the above described Tentative Tract Map No. TT 24530 for the reasons set forth in this resolution and subject to the attached conditions. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 5th day of July, 1989, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RICHARD ERWOOD, Chairman ATTEST: RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary /tm 2 PLANNING COMUSSION RESOLVI'ION NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO. TT 24530 Department of Commmity Development/PI 1. The development of the property shall conform substantially with exhibits on file with the department of commmunity development/planning, as modified by the following conditions. 2. Construction of a portion of said project shall commence within one year from the date of final approval unless an extension of time is granted; otherwise said approval shall become null, void and of no effect whatsoever. 3. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein which are in addition to all municipal ordinances and state and federal statutes now in force, or which hereafter may be in force. 4. Prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contemplated by this approval, the applicant shall first obtain permits and/or clearance from the following agencies: Coachella Valley Water District Palm Desert Architectural Commission City Fire Marshal Public Works Department Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to the department of building and safety at the time of issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. 5. That the setbacks and coverage limits for single family dwellings in this project shall be as required in the R-1 zone for 10,000 square foot minimum lot area as prescribed in section 25.16.060 of the zoning ordinance. 6. That the applicant submit and receive approval of the architectural review commission of a landscape and wall plan. 7. That the two story dwelling units be limited to lots 166 thru 170, 175 thru 217, 219 thru 280, 53 thru 58, 63 thru 69, 74 thru 81, 86 thru 93, and 97 thru 100. B. The maximum number of two story units permitted will be 91 units. 3 PLANND G ODM+IISSION RESOLUTION NO. Department of Public Works: 1. Drainage fees, in accordance with Section 26.49 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code and Palm Desert Ordinance Number 507, shall be paid prior to recordation of final map. 2. Drainage facilities shall be provided, per Ordinance No. 218 and the Northside Area Drainage Master Plan, to the specifications of the director of public works. 3. Storm drain construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study prepared by a registered civil engineer that is reviewed and approved by the department of public works prior to start of construction. 4. Signalization fees, in accordance with City of Palm Desert Resolution Nos. 79-17 and 79-55, shall be paid prior to recordation of final map. 5. Full public improvements, as required by Sections 26.40 and 26.44 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code, shall be installed in accordance with applicable city standards. 6. As required under Palm Desert Municipal Code Section 26.28, and in accordance with Section 26.28, and in accordance with Sections 26.40 and 26.44, complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted to the director of public works for checking approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. Of£site improvement plans to be approved by the public works department and a surety posted to guarantee the installation of required offsite improvements prior to recordation of final map. Such offsite improvements shall include, but not be limited to, curb and gutter, asphalt paving and concrete sidewalk in an appropriate size and configuration and provisions for deceleration lanes at the all project entry points. "As-built" plans shall be submitted to, and approved by, the director of public works prior to acceptance of the improvements by the city. 7. Improvement plans for water and sewer systems shall be approved by the respective service districts with "as-built" plans submitted to the department of public works prior to project final. 8. All public improvements shall be inspected by the department of public works and a standard inspection fee shall be paid prior to issuance of grading permits. 9. Landscaping maintenance on Cook Street and Frank Sinatra Drive shall be provided by the homeowners association. 10. Waiver of access to Cook Street and Frank Sinatra except at approved locations shall be granted on the final map. 4 n • PLANNING 0:1-MSSION RESOLUTION NO. 11. In accordance with Palm Desert Municipal Code Section 26.44, canplete grading plans and specifications shall be submitted to the director of public works for checking and approval prior to issuance of any permits. 12. In accordance with Palm Desert Municipal Code Section 27.12.067 prior to issuance of grading permits associated with this project an erosion control plan shall be submitted to the director of public works for review and approval. If mass grading of the site is proposed, those areas graded but not under construction shall be planted with a natural desert vegetation mix and properly irrigated to prevent blowing dust or sand. 13. The applicant shall provide for the installation of landscaping in the existing median island in Cook Street and Frank Sinatra Drive along the property frontage. Landscape plans for the subject installation shall be reviewed and approved by the public works department prior to any installation. 14. Traffic safety striping shall be provided to the specifications of the Director of Public Works. A traffic control plan must be submitted to, and approved by, the director of public works prior to the placement of any pavement markings. 15. Full improvements of interior streets based on residential street standards in accordance with Section 26.40 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code shall be provided. 16. Ccfrplete tract map shall be submitted as required by ordinance to the director of public works for checking and approval and be recorded before issuance of any permits. 17. Any and all offsite improvements shall be preceded by the approval of plans and the issuance of valid encroachment permits by the department of public works. 18. A complete preliminary soils investigation, conducted by a registered soils engineer, shall be submitted to and approved by the department of public works prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 19. Pad elevations, as shown on the tentative map are subject to review and modification in accordance with Chapter 27 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code. 20. Property lines for the individual lots proposed by this subdivision shall be located at tope of slope where applicable. 21. As required under Section 12.16 and Section 26.44 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code, all existing utilities shall be undergrounded per each 5 PLANNING CXPMSSION RFSOLUTICN ND. respective utility districts recommendation. If determined to be unfeasible, applicant shall agree to participate in any future utility undergrounding district. 22. As required by Sections 26.32 and 26.40 0£ the Palm Desert Municipal Code, and in accordance with the Circulation Network of the City's General Plan, dedication of half-street right-of-way at 55 feet on Cook Street and Frank Sinatra Drive shall be provided on the final map. 23. Applicant shall agree to contribute their fair share to the assessed costs for the Cook Street Extension, Interstate 10 interchange and Bridge Fund. Riverside County Fine t• 1. The fire department is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commercial buildings per Uniform Fire Code Sec. 10.301C. 2. Provide or show there exists a water system capable of providing a potential fire flow of 1500 gpn and the actual fire flow available from any one hydrant connected to any given water main shall be 1500 gpm for 2 hours duration at 20 psi residual operating pressure. 3. A fire flow of 1500 gpn for a 2 hour duration at 20 psi residual operating pressure must be available before any combustible material is placed on the job site. 4. The required fire flow shall be available from a Super hydrant(s) (6" x 4" x 2-1/2" x 2-1/2"), located not less than 25' nor more than 200' from any portion of the building(s) as measured along approved vehicular travelways. Hydrants installed below 3000' elevation shall be of the "wet barrel" type. 5. Prior to the application for a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and two copies of the water system plan to the county fire department for review. No building permit shall be issued until the water system plan has been approved by the county fire chief. Upon approval, the original will be returned. One copy will be sent to the responsible inspecting authority. 6. Plans shall conform to fire hydrant types, location and spacing, and the system shall meet the fire flow requirements. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and may be signed by the local water company with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Riverside Country Fire Department." 7. Certain designated areas will be required to be maintained as fire lanes. 6 PLANNU G OCM-IISSION RESOLUTICN NO. 8. Whenever access into private property is controlled through use of gates, barriers, guard houses or similar means, provision shall be made to facilitate access by emergency vehicles in a manner approved by the fire department. All controlled access devices that are power operated shall have a radio-controlled over-ride system capable of opening the gate when activated by a special transmitter located in emergency vehicles. Devices shall be equipped with backup power facilities to operate in the event of power failure. All controlled access devices that are not power operated shall also be approved by the fire department. Minimum opening width shall be 12' with a minimum vertical clearance of 1316". 9. Contact the fire department for a final inspection prior to occupancy. /tm 7 INITIAL STUDY CASE NO. TT 24530 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION CHECKLIST CIIM'ENTS AND POSSIBLE MITIGATION MEASURES (CATEGORIES PERTAIN TO ATTACHED CHECKLIST) 1. EARTH a. The project will result in grading. Said grading will not result in any alterations to geologic substructures nor create unstable earth conditions in that all grading will be pursuant to the grading ordinance. b. As part of the normal grading activity soil will be moved, displaced, over-covered and compacted. This activity will be done per permit and approved grading plans to assure that the site is properly prepared for the structural development which will take place on the site. C. The site slopes from northwest to southeast and changes in topography and surface relief will be required to assure proper drainage and avoid increased runoff to adjoining properties. The after condition of the property will result in less water runoff from the property to adjoining properties, and better direction. d. The site does not contain any unique geologic or physical features. e. The project as stated previously will result in less potential water damage to the site, through proper grading resulting in the appropriate directing of runoff from the site. Mitigation Measures The City of Palm Desert grading and building permits procedures require detailed geotechnical reports addressing grading specifications and the settlement and expansive characteristics of on-site soils. All structures must be designed by UBC rem,;rements to insure that the buildings are constructed within the acceptable level of risk set forth therein for the type of building and occupancies being developed. 2. AIR a. During construction, particularly grading, a potential dust problem will be a short-term impact. Requiring that the ground be moistened during days in which grading occurs will mitigate this problem. This is required by City of Palm Desert Grading Ordinance. Because the site is already an urbanized setting its development will not result in an overall deterioration of ambient air quality. This conclusion is supported by the discussions relating to air quality contained in a 1985 draft environmental impact report prepared for INITIAL STUDY TT 24530 the City of Rancho Mirage by Michael Brandman Associates entitled "Park View Drive Land Use Study". b. The proposed development does not call for any odorous land uses. C. Development of this site will not result in any climatic changes. This is due to its size and identified uses. 3. WATER a. Water will be redirected to drainage facilities designed and constructed to accept the water from the site. b. The site will absorb less water due to ground coverage. The landscaped areas will absorb water because of the plant material. The alterations in drainage patterns will result in a benefit to adjoining property as it will be directed in a control manner. C. See b. d. There is no ground water present on the site. e. See d. f. While any development results in the use of water and, therefore, reduces the amount otherwise available for public water supplies; the Coachella Valley Water District assures that there is sufficient water supplies to accornmdate this growth. 4. PLANT LIFE a. The project when completed will introduce a diversity of species to the site. The plants that will be introduced to the site will, however, be material previously used in the desert. b. The site does not contain any unique, rare or endangered species of plant life. C. It is extremely doubtful that the project will introduce any new species into the area. In any event the landscape plan will be reviewed by the architectural inspector of Riverside County to assure that the plants being used do not pose a hazard to agricultural production in the area. 2 INITIAL STUDY TT 24530 5. ANIMAL LIFE a. The project will not increase or decrease the variety of animal life on the site. b. The site does contain habitat for the fringe-toed lizard, an endangered specie. As mitigation the applicant will be required to pay $600 per acre to the Nature Conservancy for use in acquiring habitat area north of I-10. C. See b and c. d. The project site is an in-fill site and not a suitable habitat for wildlife. 6. NATURAL RESOURCES a. The project will obviously use natural resources, but will not increase the rate of usage of these resources. b. All material resources used on the site are renewable. 7. a. & b. No more than normal usage. In addition, since the project will be required to comply with the most current state energy codes, energy usage will be less than on previous projects of a similar nature. 8. The site does not contain any substances that could result in explosion or escape of hazardous materials. 9. a. As discussed earlier the project will have a positive impact in terms of drainage impacts on adjacent properties. b. Properties in the area are not subject to unusual geologic hazards. The project will not effect that hazard. 10. NOISE Construction and subsequent use as single family dwellings will increase ambient noise level. The increase will not create a long term annoyance to the adjacent residential properties. Mitigation Measures Strict adherence to construction hours and days will be required. 3 INITIAL STUDY TT 24530 11. LAND USE The project will not alter the present developed land use in the area. The planned land use for the area is identified as low density residential; the project would develop land uses permitted in the low density residential land use designation (5 du/acre). 12. OPEN SPACE The site in question is designated as low density residential; its development, therefore, will not result in a reduction in the amount of designated open space. Park fees collected from this development will be used to purchase park land or develop park land to serve this area. 13. POPULATION a. Developing single family lots in the area designated low density residential will not result in changes in location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the city's population. b. The project will not generate changes in the socio-economic characteristics of the area. 14. EI'TLOYMENT While the project will provide a number of new jobs in terms of the value as a whole, in and of itself, it is minor. Most of the jobs created: gardeners, pool maintenance and other service personnel, however, will be filled by residents of the area or those who have come to the valley for other reasons. 15. HOUSING a. The project will not change the housing picture in the community or region. This is based on the conclusions reached in items 13 and 14. b. None - covered in item 15 a. 16. TRANSPORTATION/cIRm ATION a. Projected trip generation per single family dwelling unit per day is 10 for a total of 2760 trip ends per day. As part of the conditions of approval the applicant shall be required to provide road improvements as provided by the circulation element of the general plan. 4 INITIAL STUDY TT 245M b. All new single family dwellings are required to provide two covered parking spaces as well as on-street and driveway parking. C. Except for additional vehicular movements discussed above the project should not generate additional demands on existing transportation systems. In addition these systems have additional capacity to accept the traffic these projects will create. d. Principal access to the area will be via Frank Sinatra Drive and Cook Street. e. Implementation of the mitigation measures set forth by item 16a should result in positive impacts. 17. PUBLIC SERVICE a-f. None. The property is presently vacant. A conmutment to urban uses was made as the area surrounding the study area has been developed, and the general plan and zoning maps designated the area for residential development. Infrastructure improvements (i.e. : streets and utilities) have been made and are adequate to serve the proposed development. The proposed land uses would increase the economic productivity of the land in terms of land efficiency and greater economic return generated from these uses, versus the current state of the land. 18. PUBLIC FISCAL BALANCE The project will result in a net increase on fiscal flow to the City of Palm Desert through an increase in the assessed value of the land. 19. UTILITIES All utilities have indicated an ability to serve the proposed development. 20. HUMAN HEALTH The project will not create hazard to human health in the long or short term nor will it impact the level of ccnuunity health. 21. SOCIAL SERVICES The property will be developed with single family dwellings and apartments. Owners of these homes will pay substantial amounts of property tax and generally have a low incidence of use of social services. Any increase in the demand for general social services will be minimal, 5 INITIAL STUDY TT 24530 22. AESTHETICS a. The city grading ordinance and architectural review process take into account the effects development may have on adjacent properties and the views available from public streets. Care will be taken to assure that any impact on views from adjacent properties or scenic vistas will be minimized, b. The proposed single family dwellings must be approved by the Palm Desert Architectural review process. C. For reasons stated in items 22 a and b. 23. LIGHT AND GLARE a. New light will be produced but the effects will be minimal. 24. There has been no evidence of any archeological or historical significance of this site. In addition, state law requires that should any evidence be found during construction, construction must cease and the site cleared. 25. Because of the mitigation measures identified herein and required of the project, the proposal will riot have a significant adverse impact on the environment. SRS/tm 6 J CASE :v0 . 17 Y 3D =x M1J0TTt=AL S=VICES DEPT. INITIAL STUDY EWIA0NM- NTTAL EVALUATION CEECXLIST NOTE: The availability of data necessary to address the topics listed below shall form the basis of a decision as to whether the application is considered complete for purposes of environmental assessment. ENVIROrVENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers , possible mitigation measures and comments are provided on attached sheets) . Yes Maybe No 1 . Earth. Will the proposal result in: ° a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in _ _ _ geologic substructures? b. Oisruptions , displacements , compaction, or overcovering of the soil? c. Change in topography or ground surface relief / features? d. The destruction, covering ., or modification / of any unique geologic or physical features? — _ _✓ e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? 0 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air / quality? — b. The creation of objectionable odors? c. Alteration of air movement, moisture , or temperature , or any change in climate , either locally or regionally? _ Yes Maybe No 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes- in currents, 'or the course or / . 1` direction of water' movements? _ _ _ b. Changes in—absorption rates , drainage patterns, or the rate and- amoUnt of surface water runoff? c. Alterations to the course or flow of — — flood waters? d. Alteration of .the .direction or rate of flow of ground waters? e. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or with- drawals, or through interception of an / aquifer by cuts or excavations? _ _✓ f. Reduction in the amount of water other- / wise available for public water sugplies? _ 4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of plants ( including trees , shrubs , grass , and / crops )? V b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or endangered species of plants? c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area , or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? S. Animal. Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds , land animals including reptiles , or insects )? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, / rare, or endangered species of animals? c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d. Oeterioration to existing wildlife habrta+.7 � I 3. Yes Ma`be No 6. Natural Resources . Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in :.the rate of use of any natural resources? _ b. Depletion of any non-renewable natural resource? 7. Energy. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? _ b. Demand upon existing sources of energy, or re- quire the.deselopment of new sources of / energy? S. Risk of U set. . Does the proposal involve a risk o an explosion or the release of , hazardous substances ( including, but not limited to, pesticides ,* oil , chemicals ,- or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? _ V/ 9. E--onomic Loss. Will the proposal result in: a. A change in the value of property and improvements endangered by flooding? _ b. A change in the value of property and impro•+emen:s exposed to geologic hazards / beyond accepted community risk standards? 10. Noise . Will the proposal increase existing noise levels to the point at which accepted community noise and vibration levels are / exceeded? V il . Land 'use. Will the proposal result in the a=ration of the present developed or planned land use of an area? 12. Ooen Space. Will the proposal lead to a decrease in theoemcunt of designated open space? 13 . PcOulat4on. Will the proposal result in: a. Alteration or the location, distribution , density , or growth rate of the human / Population of the City? V/ b. Change in the population distribution by aye , income, religion, racial , or ethnic / group , occupational class , household type? V 4. Yes Maybe No 14. Emo10 ent. Will the proposal result in add�t�onaI new long-tern+ jobs provided, or a change in the number and per cent employed, unemployed, and underemployed? 15. Housino. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in number and per cent of housing units by type (price or rent range, zoning category, owner-occupied and rental , etc. ) relative to demand or to number of families in various income classes in the City? b. Impacts on existing housing or creation of a demand for additional housing? 16. Transoortation/Circulation. Will the proposal result An: / a. Generation of additional vehicular movement? V _ b. Effects on existing parking facilities , or / demand for new parking? — — V c. Impact upon existing transportation systems? _ _ d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation '/ or movement of people and/or goods? V e. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, / bicyclists , D or pedest rians? V 17 . Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon , or result in a need for, new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? b. Police protection? / III c. Schools? d. Parks or other recreational facilities? _ e. Maintenance of public facilities , including roads? / f. Other governmental services? _. — ✓ 5. Yes Maybe No 18. Public Fiscal Balance. Will the proposal result in a net change in government fiscal flow (revenues less operating expenditures and annualized capital expenditures)? 19. Utilities.. _ Will the proposal result in a need for new systems , or alterations to the following utilities: r a. Power or natural gas? ✓ b. Communications system? c. Water? d. Sewer or septic tanks? e. Storm water drainage? f. Solid waste and disposal ? 20. Human Health. Will the proposal result in: ' a. The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? _ _ ,/ b. A change in the level of community health care provided? 21 . Social Seriices. Will the proposal result in _ an increased demand for provision of general / social services? 22. Aesthetics . Will the proposal result in: a. Obstruction of any scenic vista, or view open to the public? — ✓ b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? c. Lessening of the overall neighborhood (or area ) attractiveness, pleasantness , and uniqueness? 23. Liaht and Glare. Will the proposal produce — — ne:v lignt or Tare? N . Archealoaical/Historical . Will the proposal resu t in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure , / object, or building? I S 6. Yes Maybe No 25. Mandatory Findings of Sioniaicance- a. Oaes the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment or to curtail / the diversity .in the environment? b. Ooes the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental •goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future. ) r—/ c. Oces the project have impacts which are indi- vidually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact an two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small , but where the effect of Vie total of those impacts on the environment / is significant. ) — — (—/ d. Ooes the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings , either directly or indirectly? — — Initial Study Prepared By: TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 24530 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Proposed Usage: Development of 276 single-family, detached homes on 90 acres of land fronting on Cook and Frank Sinatra Streets. Existing Zoning: Planned Residential, five units per acre (PR-5) . Density: Proposed density is 3 . 07 lots per acre. Lot Size and Configuration: Minimum net lot size is 10, 000 square feet, based on design criterion of 80 feet x 125 feet. Average (mean) lot size is 11, 350 square feet. Streets: Streets will be privately owned and maintained within the walled, gated development. Proposed Structures: Size: Houses sizes will be from 1, 850 to 3, 000 square feet of net livable area, and most will have three-car garages. Stories: One-third of the houses will be two-story, which will not exceed .24 feet in height and will not be built within 200 feet of the public streets. The second stories will be set back from the front line of the first stories to eliminate vertical appearance. Exterior Features: All homes will have tile roofs, plastered walls (desert colors) , landscaped front yards, lighted parkway trees, and fenced or walled rear and side yards. Lot Coverage: The footprint of the house and three-car garage will cover less than 37% of the lot. Set-backs: The front and rear set-backs will be a minimum of 20 feet, while the minimum distance between side walls will be 10 feet. Pricing: The homes will be priced from $165, 000 to $275, 000. Phasing: The property will be developed in twenty-acre phases, beginning at the Cook Street entrance, with each phase containing approximately 62 homes. INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Department of Community Development/Planning Attention: Steve Smith FROM: Richard J . Fol.kers, Asst. City Manager/Public Works Director SUBJECT: TENTATIVE TRACT 24530, BARON'S FINANCIAL GROUP DATE: June 21 , 1989 The following should be considered conditions of approval for the above- referenced project : (1) Drainage fees, in accordance with Section 26.49 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code and Palm Desert Ordinance Number 507, shall be paid prior to recordation of final map. (2) Drainage facilities shall be provided, per Ordinance No. 218 and the Northside Area Drainage Master Plan, to the specifications of the Director of Public works. (1) Storm drain construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study prepared by a registered civil engineer that is reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works prior to start of construction. (4) Signalization fees, in accordance with City of Palm Desert Resolution Nos. 79 -17 and 79-55, shall be paid prior to recordation of final map. (5) Full public improvements, as required by Sections 26.40 and 26.44 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code, shall be installed in accordance with applicable City standards. (6) As re(piied under Palm Desert Municipal Code Section 26. 28, and in accordance with Sections 26.40 and 26.44, complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted to the Director of Public Works for checking approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. Offsite improvement plans to be approved by the Public Works Department and a surety posted to guarantee the installation of required offsite improvements prior to recordation of final map. Such offsite improvements shall include, but not be limited to, curb and gutter, asphalt paving and concrete sidewalk in an appropriate size and configuration and provisions for deceleration/acceleration lanes at the all project entry points. "As- built" plans shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Director of Public Works prior to the acceptance of the improvements by the city. (7) Improvement plans .for water and sewer systems shall be approved by the respective service districts with "as-built" plans submitted to the Department of. Public Works prior to project final. (8) All public and private improvements shall be inspected by the Department of Public Works and a ;standard inspection fee shall be paid prior to issuance of grayling permi.ts. (9) Laudscapi.ug ucri_ntenauce oil Cook Street; and Frank Sinatra Drive shall be Provided by the homeowners association. (10) Waiver of access to Cook Street and Frank Sinatra except at approved locations shall be granted on the Final Map. U 1) 111 accordance with Palm Desert Municipal. Code Section 26.44, complete grading plans and specifications shall be submitted to the Director of Public Works for checking and approval prior to issuance of any permits. (12) Tu accordance with Palm Desert. Municipal Code Section 27.12.067 prior to issuance of grading permits associated with this project an erosion control plan shall be suhmitted to the Director of Public Works for review and approval, if mass grading of the site is proposed, those areas graded but not: under constructi_ou shall. be planted with a natural desert vegetation niis and properly irrigated to prevent blowing dust or sand. bb1 sT,eCE7 Cl3) The applicant shall provide ZW—C-4-u-b-Diz-i-v-e- and e installation of landscaping in the existing median island in-ef""t Frank Sinatra Drive along the property frontage. Landscape plans for the subject installation shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department prior to any i.nstallatjon. ( 1.4) Traffic safety Striping shall be provided to the specifications of the Director of Public Works . A traffic control plan must be submitted to, and approved by, t:he Director of Public Works prior to the placement of any pavement rnarki_ngs. (15) Full improvements of interior streets haled on residential street standards in accordance with Section 26.40 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code shall be provided. (16) Complete tract map shall be submitted as required by ordinance to the Director of Public Works for checking and approval and be recorded before issuance of any permits. (17) Any and all offsite improvements shall be preceded by the approval of plans and the .issuance of valid encroachment permits by the Department of Public Works. (18) A complete preliminary soils investigation, conducted by a registered soils engineer, shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Department of Public Works prior to the issuance of a grading permit. (19) Pad elevations, as shown on the tentative map are subject to review and modification in accordance with Chapter 27 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code. (20) Property lines for the individual lots proposed by this subdivision shall be located at top of slope where applicable. (21 ) As required under Section 12.16 and Section 26.44 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code, all existing utilities shall be undergrounded per each respective utility- districts recommendation. If determined to be unfeasible, applicant shall agree to participate in any future utility undergrounding district. (22) As required by Sections 26.32 and 26.40 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code, and in accordance with the Circulation Network of the City's General Plan, dedication of half-street right -of-way at 55 feet on Cook Street and Frank Sinatra Drive shall be provided on the final map. (23) Applicant shall agree to contribute their fair share of the assessed costs for the Cook Street Extension, Interstate 10 interchange and Bridge Fund. 1�0XjRICHARD J. FOLKERS, P.E. Ijs9ltr24Si0.iarJ .. i RIVERSIDE COUNTY 'k,"ORNIA Of FIRE DEPARTMENT aF'�OF pE PROTfC hAY IN COOPERATION WITH THE ' C'OUNTY y ' =-i CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY C r my AND FIRE PROTECTION RIVERSIDE- F GLEN J. NEWMAN f ' t— FIRE CHIEF 210 WEST SAN JACINTO AVENUE PERRIS, CALIFORNIA 92370 TELEPHONE: (714) 657.3183 June 2, 1989 To: Ray Diaz, Dir. Comm.Dev./Planning Attn:Steve smith Re: TT 24530 Barons Financial Group With respect to the conditions of approval regarding the above referenced the Fire Department recommends the following fire protection measures be provided in accordance with Uniform Fire Code and/or recognized Fire Protection Standards: The Fire Department is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commercial buildings per Uniform Fire Code Sec. 10. 301C. Provide, or show there exists a water system capable of providing a potential fire flow of 1500 gpm and the actual fire flow available from any one hydrant connected to any given water main shall be 1500 gpm for 2 hours duration at 20 psi residual operating pressure. A fire flow of 1500 gpm for a 2 hour duration at 20 psi residual operating pressure must be available before any combustible material is placed on the job site. The required fire flow shall be available from a Super hydrant (s) (6" x 4" x 2-112" x 2-1/2") , located not less than 25 ' nor more than 200 ' from any portion of the building(s) as measured along approved vehicular travelways. Hydrants installed below 3000 ' elevation shall be of the "wet barrel" type. Prior- to the application for a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and two copies of the water system plan to the County Fire Department for review. No building permit shall be issued until the water- system plan has been approved by the County Fire Chief. Upon approval , the original will be returned. One copy will be sent to the responsible inspecting authority. Plans shall conform to fire hydrant types, location and spacing, and the system shall meet the fire flow requirements. Plans shall be signed by a Registered Civil Engineer and may be signed by the local water company with the following certification: " I certify that the design of the water system is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Riverside County Fire Department . " Certain designated areas will be required to be maintained as fire lanes. Dead-end roads in excess of 150 ' shall be provided with a minimum 45 ' radius turn-around (55 ' in industrial developments) . Whenever access into private property is controlled through use of gates, barriers, guard houses or similar means, provision shall be made to facilitate access by emergency vehicles in a manner approved by the Fire Department . All controlled access devices that are power operated shall have a radio-controlled over-ride system capable of opening the gate when activated by a special transmitter located in emergency vehicles. Devices shall be equipped with backup power facilities to -operate in the event of power failure. All controlled access devices that are not power operated shall also be approved by the Fire Department . Minimum opening width shall be 12 ', with a minimum vertical clearance of 13 '6" . Contact the Fire Department for a final inspection prior to occupancy. All questions regarding the meaning of these conditions should be referred to the Fire Department Fire Protection/Inspection Staff. Sincerely, Ranger in Charge County Fire Chief By Jim Reeder Fire Protection Specialist bbm CITY OF PALM DESERT INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Steve Smith FROM: Brent Conley RE: TT24530 DATE: June 1, 1989 The Police Department would like to see the entrance "A" Roadway be continued by moving lots 183 and 210 North, changing street "F" location to improve circulation. The Police Department reserves comment on particular units until submittal . If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to contact me;Zaext. 2 Brent Conley Crime Prevention Officer BC/rh , ESTABLISHED IN 1918 AS A PUBLIC AGENCY �TSTRI�t COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT POST OFFICE BOX 1058• COACHELLA, CALIFORNIA 92236•TELEPHONE(619)3982651 DIRECTORS OFFICERS TELLIS CODEKAS,PRESIDENT THOMAS E.LEW,GENERAL MANAGER-CHIEF ENGINEER RAYMOND R.RUMMONDS,VICE PRESIDENT BERNARDINE SUTTON,SECRETARY JOHN P.POWELL KEITH H.AINSWORTH,ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER DOROTHY M.NICHOLS June 13, 1989 REDWINE AND SHERRILL,ATTORNEYS THEODORE J.FISH ff I'�'� File: 0163.1 Department of Environmental Services jy \-J 1_L� ' City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Drive J U N 2 U 1989 Palm Desert, California 92260 cOhihiUNur DEVELOPMENT DepARi;eLNi Gentlemen: CITY ,F PALM DESERT Subject: Tentative Tract 24530, Portion of Northeast Quarter, Section 4, Township 5 South, Range 6 East, San Bernardino Meridian This area lies on the sandy area in the northern portion of Palm Desert and is considered safe from stormwater flows except. in rare instances. The district will furnish domestic water and sanitation service to this area in accordance with the current regulations of this district. These regulations provide for the payment of certain fees and charges by the subdivider and said fees and charges are subject to change. This area shall be annexed to Improvement District No. 70 of Coachella Valley Water District for domestic water service. The district will need additional facilities to provide for the orderly expansion of its domestic water system. These facilities may include wells, reservoirs and booster pumping stations. The developer will be required to provide land on which some of these facilities will be located. These sites shall be shown on the tract map as lots to be deeded to the district for such purpose. Plans for grading, landscaping, and irrigation systems shall be submitted to Coachella Valley Water District for review. This review is for ensuring efficient water management. If you have any questions please call Bob Meleg, stormwater engineer, extension 264. You s very truly, Tom Levy General Manager-Chief Engi eer RF:bg cc: Don Park Riverside County Department of Public Health 46-209 Oasis Street TRUE CONSERVATION Indio, California 92201 USE WATER WISELY REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS & DEVELOPMENT 69730 HIGHWAY 111, STE..212 • RANCHO MIRAGE, CA 92270 (619) 328.9111 June 29, 1989 JUN 3 0 1989 COM1f'"lrY DEVELOPMENT DEPARIMENT CITY('F PALM DESERT Mr. Raymond Diaz, Planning Director City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 Re: Tentative Tract No. .24530 Dear Mr. Diaz: Enclosed is a brief recap of the processing of our map through city staff. We appreciated the staff's getting involved with our problems and working with us on the solutions. Their requests and require- ments were firm, but reasonable, and we now feel the changes have resulted in a much better overall design. sincerely, Baron's Financial Group by Richard Krotz RJK:js- TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 25430 90 ACRES - COOK & SINATRA SUMMARY OF CHANGES DURING MAP SUBMISSION Tract Design• a) During initial meetings with Staff, made three complete tract layout revisions, with the main objective of changing the street design from rectilinear to curvilinear. b) Changed the minimum lot size from 9, 000 square feet to 10, 000 square feet. c) On Staff's recommendation, recently changed 41 lots on westerly boundary of tract from east-west orientation to north-south. This created three additional cul de sacs on the westerly road. Access• Changed the northerly access from an entrance on Frank Sinatra Drive to an access through city property on the west, to tie it into city's future plans for convention center. Street Grade• Reverted from the requested .35% grade to .40% grade required by Staff, resulting in revision of the grading plan and moving retention basin on Cook Street from north to south end of the property. Sideyard Set-Back: Reverted from requested 10-foot total sideyard setback to Staff-required 14-foot total set-back (minimum 5 feet) on single-story houses, and on two-story houses from requested 10-foot total setback to 20-foot total (minimum 8 foot) required by Staff. r TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 24530 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Proposed Usage: Development of 276 single-family, detached homes on 90 acres of land fronting on Cook and Frank Sinatra Streets. Existing Zoning: Planned Residential, five units per acre (PR-5) . Density: Proposed density is 3 . 07 lots per acre. Lot Size and Configuration: Minimum net lot size is 10, 000 square feet, based on design criterion of 80 feet x 125 feet. Average (mean) lot size is 11, 350 square feet. Streets: Streets will be privately owned and maintained within the walled, gated development. Proposed Structures: Size: Houses sizes will be from 1,850 to 3 , 000 square feet of net livable area, and most will have three-car garages. Stories: One-third of the houses will be two-story, which will not exceed 24 feet in height and will not be built within 200 feet of the public streets. The second stories will be set back from the front line of the first stories to eliminate vertical appearance. Exterior Features: All homes will have tile roofs, plastered walls (desert colors) , landscaped front yards, lighted parkway trees, and fenced or walled rear and side yards. Lot Coverage: The footprint of the house and three-car garage will cover less than 37% of the lot. Set-backs: The front and rear set-backs will be a minimum of 20 feet, while the minimum distance between side walls will be 10 feet. Pricing: The homes will be priced from $165, 000 to $275, 000. Phasing: The property will be developed in twenty-acre phases, beginning at the Cook Street entrance, with each phase containing approximately 62 homes. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL MAP —i••' — --- �•an. !RANK 5/N47/iA CR .. M.. T�T.1:l=Lie ►L'��TL-1—�—,—� — sl `1 N ' vay.i + 013 " 014 w 24"&q. O " 06 07 08 ' 09 e +7ftR1 r ^ uia all :< n � 4i ti r 620-190-011 017 s r . • too ir.• ip• .w• uir• w i QdD - .•. 1020-ISO-0 3 ? B9) t O • ' + 4 • b 90. a e b Ufa• s.wr .. •� .r sno• ...� s? s e CQwv7Br C[ui OR. 1—` t J IJ Tj _- .�.. iN T TENTATIVE TRACT 24530 LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND OWNERSHIP Legal Assessor's Amount of Description Numbers Acreage Ownership Ownership Parcel 5 620-190-011 20 ac Richard B. and Thomas Taylor Parcel 6 620-190-006 10 ac " Parcel 7 620-190-008 5 ac if Parcel 8 620-190-009 5 ac It Parcel 9 620-190-007 10 ac to Parcel 2 620-190-013 10 ac Richard B. Taylor, Trustee under ' Parcel 3 620-190-014 10 ac " Richard B. Taylor California Trust Parcel 4 620-190-017 20 ac Totals 8 90 ac TENTATIVE TRACT 24530 KEY PARTIES INVOLVED IN DEVELOPMENT Principal• Baron's Financial Group Richard J. Krotz, Owner 69730 Hwy 111, Suite 212 Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 (619) 328-9111 Engineer• Charles Haver and Associates Tom Lagier Charles Haver 74390 Hwy 111 Palm Desert 92260 (619) 346-7481 Architect• George W. Jelks, A.Z.A. 31 Mainsail Drive Oceanside, CA 92054 (619) 722-5656 Title Company orange Coast Title Company Mindy Logan 1060 E. Washington St. , Suite 200 Colton, CA 92324 (800) 472-8591 ORANG _ COAST TITLE COMP NY 1060 E. Washington Street, Suite 200 Colton, California 92324 (714) 825-8800 -- -------PRErMEMARY REPORT------------------------- Baron Financial 69730 Hwy. 111, Ste. 212 Rancho Mirage, California 92270 Date: April 24, 1989 Attention: Richard Krotz Your No. Tr 24530 Order No. R-70789-4 Dated as of April 12, 1989 at 7:30 A.M. In response to the above referenced application for a policy of title insurance, the insurer hereby reports that it is prepared to issue, or cause to be issued, as the date hereof, a Policy or Policies of Title Insurance describing the land and the estate or interest therein hereinafter set forth, insuring against loss which may be sustained by reason of any defect, lien or encumbrance not shown or referred to as an Exception below or not excluded from coverage pursuant to the printed Schedules, Conditions and Stipulations of said policy forms. The printed Exceptions and Exclusions from the coverage of said Policy or Policies are set forth in Schedule 1 and Schedule 1 (continued) attached. Copies of the Policy forms should be read. They are available from the office which issued this report. This report (and any supplements or amendments hereto) is issued solely for the purpose of facilitating the issuance of a policy of title insurance and no liability is assumed hereby. If it is desired that liability be assumed prior to the issuance of a policy of title insurance, a Binder or Commitment should be requested. t�-r,mYTDGAN Ti -le0fficer The form of policy of title insurance contemplated by this report is: "A Subdivision Guarantee" The estate or interest in the land hereinafter described or referred to covered by this Report is: A Fee as to Parcel 1 to 5 and 7 to 9; an Easement as to Parcel 6. Title to said estate or interest at the date hereof is vested in: Thomas H. Taylor and Richard B. Taylor, as to Parcels 1 through 6; Richard B. Taylor, Trustee, under the Richard B. Taylor California Trust, as to Parcels 7, 8 and 9, subject to Item No. 8 of this Report Omer No. R-70789-4 The land referred to in this Report is situated in the State of California, County of Riverside and is described as follows: Tentative Tract No. 24530 more particularly described as follows: Av o T .4 Pp R 7" The Eas -half of the North one-half of the Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of ion 4, Township 5 South, Range 6 East, San Bernardino Base and Meridian; Also described as the tone-half of the North one-half of the West one-half of Lot 1 in the Northeast of Section 4, Township 5 South, Range 6 East, San Bernardino Base and Meridian; Also Excepting therefrom one-half of oil and mineral rights as reserved by Lucille Sleeper in document recorded 20, 1956, in Book 1883, page 571 of Official Records of Riverside County, Califo PARCEL 2: The West one-half of the following described property: The Northwest quarter of the Southeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 4, Township 5 South, Range 6 East, San Bernardino Base and Meridian. PARCEL 3: The West one-half of the North one-half of the Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 4, Township 5 South, Range 6 East, San Bernardino Base and Meridian; Also described as the West one-half of the North one-half of the West one-half of Lot 1 in the Northeast quarter of Section 4, Township 5 South, Range 6 East, San Bernardino Base and Meridian; Excepting therefrom one-half of all oil and mineral rights as reserved by Lucille Sleeper in document recorded March 20, 1956, in Book 1883, page 571 of Official Records of Riverside County, California. PARCEL 4: The East one-half of the following described property: The Northwest quarter of the Southeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 4, Township 5 South, Range 6 East, San Bernardino Base and Meridian. PARCEL 5: The South one-half of the Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 4, Township 5 South, Range 6 East, San Bernardino Base and Meridian; County of Riverside, State of California. Also described as the South one-half of the West one-half of Lot 1 in the Northeast quarter of Section 4, Township 5 South, Range 6 East, San Bernardino Base and Meridian; Continued Continued: Order No. R-70789-4 Excepting therefrom one-half of all oil and mineral rights as reserved by Lucille Sleeper, a widow, to Samuel D. Arner, an unmarried man, dated February 23, 1956 and filed for record March 20, 1956. PARCEL 6: An easement for road purposes over the North 20 feet of the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 4, Township 5 South, Range 6 Fast, San Bernardino Base and Meridian. PARCEL 7: The South half of the Southeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 4, Township 5 South, Range 6 Fast, San Bernardino Base and Meridian. EXCEPTING the Easterly 44 feet as granted to the County of Riverside by Instrument recorded June 4, 1962 as Instrument No. 51903, of Official Records of Riverside County, California. PARCEL 8: The West half of the West half of the West half of Government Lot 2 of the Northeast quarter of Section 4, Township 5 South, Range 6 East, San Bernardino Base and Meridian; Excepting therefrom one-half of all oil and minerals, as reserved by Lucile Sleeper by Deed recorded Decenber 14, 1961 as Instrument No. 107309 of Official Records of Riverside County, California. PARCEL 9: The East half of the West half of the West half of Government Lot 2 of the Northeast quarter of Section 4, Township 5 South, Range 6 East, San Bernardino Base and Meridian; Excepting therefrom one-half of all oil and minerals, as reserved by Lucile Sleeper by Deed recorded December 14, 1961 as Instrument No. 107309 of Official Records of Riverside County, California. At the date hereof exceptions to coverage in addition to the Exceptions and Exclusions in said policy form would be as follows: A. General and Special Taxes for the fiscal year 1989-1990. A lien not yet payable. B. Any Bonds will be reported later. C. Second Installment General and Special Taxes for the fiscal year 1988- 1989, $1,285.53, plus penalty of $128.55, plus costs of $10.00, Code Area 018074, Assessors Parcel No. 620-190-007-7, Exemption $none. D. Second Installment General and Special Taxes for the fiscal year 1988- 1989, $655.82, plus penalty of $65.58, plus costs of $10.00, Code Area 018074, Assessors Parcel No. 620-190-008-8, Exemption $none. Continued Continued: Order No. R-70789-4 E. Second Installment General and Special Taxes for the fiscal year 1988- 1989, $1,285.53, plus penalty of $128.55, plus costs of $10.00, Code Area 018074, Assessors Parcel No. 620-190-006-6, Exemption $none. F. Second Installment General and Special Taxes for the fiscal year 1988- 1989, $655.82, plus penalty of $65.58, plus costs of $10.00, Code Area 018074, Assessors Parcel No. 620-190-009-9, Exemption $none. G. Second Installment General and Special Taxes for the fiscal year 1988- 1989, $2,555.98, plus penalty of $255.59, plus costs of $10.00, Code Area 018074, Assessors Parcel No. 620-190-011-0, Exemption $none. H. Second Installment General and Special Taxes for the fiscal year 1988- 1989, $10,048.85, plus penalty of $1,004.88, plus costs of $10.00, Code Area 018074, Assessors Parcel No. 620-190-017-6, Exemption $none. I. Second Installment General and Special Taxes for the fiscal year 1988- 1989, $4,425.97, plus penalty of $442.59, plus costs of $10.00, Code Area 018074, Assessors Parcel No. 620-190-013-2, Exemption $none. J. Second Installment General and Special Taxes for the fiscal year 1988- 1989, $4,425.97, plus penalty of $442.59, plus costs of $10.00, Code Area 018074, Assessors Parcel No. 620-190-014-3, Exemption $none. K. Any additional amounts of general and special taxes which may be assessed by reason of: (a) Reappraisal of the property values as of March 1, 1975; (b) Improvements added subsequent to March 1, 1975; (c) Change of ownership subsequent to March 1, 1975; (d) Any final judgment determining Article 13A as added to the Constitution of the State of California, being invalid, unconstitutional, or having been improperly applied. L. The lien of supplemental taxes, if any, assessed pursuant to the provisions of Section 75, et seq. of the Revenue and Taxation Code of the State of California. M. Prior to the recordation of the map of 24530, all current and delinquent taxes, bonds and assessments, if any, must be paid. N. If the Map of 24530, records between March 1, 1989 and November 1, 1989, it will be necessary to past a Tax Bond with the County of Riverside, Cash or Surety, prior to recording. Please contact this office prior to submitting said bond. 1. Rights of the public in and to any portion of said land lying within any lawfully established streets, roads or highways. Continued Continued: Order No. R-70789-4 2. Reservations recited in the Patent from the United States, as follows: "Subject to any vested and accrued water rights for mining, agricultural, manufacturing or other purposes, and rights to ditches and reservoirs used in connection with such water rights as may be recognized and acknowledged by the local customs, laws and decisions of courts, and a right of way for ditches or canals constructed by authority of the United States" recorded Dec. 26, 1916, in Book 7, Page 210 of Patents. The signatures of The Governing Body of the United States of America may be omitted from the recorded Map if its/their name(s) and the nature of its/their respective interest is endorsed on said map under Section 66436 (c) of the Government Code. 3. An easement for road purposes and incidental purposes, as granted to Norris Andrews in the deed recorded March 17, 1948 in Book 896, Page 322, of Official Records, along the North Twenty (20) feet of Government Iots 1 and 2 of the Northeast quarter of Section 4, Township 5 South, Range 6 Fast, San Bernardino Base and Meridian. Affects: Parcels 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 9 and other property. Note: Pursuant to the provisions of the Government Code Section 66436 (c) (2) , the signature(s) of said easement holder(s) may be omitted, since said easement appears to no longer be of practical use or value and such signature(s) are impossible or impractical to obtain. 4. An easement for pipelines for the purpose of transporting irrigation waters and incidental purposes, as granted to John J. Kovacevich, by Deed recorded May 21, 1952 in Book 1370, Page 464 of Official Records along a center line of unlocatable width from a point 28 feet South of the Northeast corner of Section 4, Township 5 South, Range 6 East, San Bernardino Base and Meridian; thence Westerly and parallel to the north line of said Section, to the West boundary of the Northeast quarter of said section. Affects: Parcels 8 and 9 Note: Pursuant to the provisions of the Government Code Section 66436 (c) (2) , the signature(s) of said easement holder(s) may be omitted, since said easement appears to no longer be of practical use or value and such signature(s) are impossible or impractical to obtain. 5. An easement for public road and highway and incidental purposes, as granted to The City of Palm Desert in the deed recorded Nov. 1, 1985 as Instrument No. 247401, of Official Records, along the Northerly 55.00 feet. Affects: Parcels 8 and 9 The signatures of The City of Palm Desert may be omitted from the recorded Map if its/their name(s) and the nature of its/their respective interest is endorsed on said map under Section 66436 (c) of the Government Code. Continued Continued: Order No. R-70789-4 6. An easement for public road and highway and incidental purposes, as granted to the City of Palm Desert in the deed recorded Nov. 1, 1985 as Instrument No. 247042 and recorded Nov. 22, 1985 as Instrument No. 264029 and Recorded Dec. 6, 1985 as Instrument No. 275659, all of Official Records, along the Easterly 11 feet. Affects: Parcel 7 The signatures of The City of Palm Desert may be omitted from the recorded Map if its/their name(s) and the nature of its/their respective interest is endorsed on said map under Section 66436 (c) of the Government Code. 7. An unrecorded option to purchase said land upon the terms, covenants and provisions therein provided, a memorandum thereof being recorded March 17, 1989, as Instrument No. 083079, of Official Records. Dated: Feb. 22, 1989. Optionor: Richard B. Taylor, Thomas H. Taylor and Richard B. Taylor, Trustee of the Richard B. Taylor California Trust. Optionee: Richard J. Krctz. 8. Any invalidity or defect in the title of the vestees in the event that the trust referred to in the vesting portion of Schedule A is invalid or fails to grant sufficient powers to the trustee(s) or in the even there is a lack of compliance with the terms and provisions of the trust instrument. 9. We shall require that declaration of trust referred to in the vesting herein be submitted for our examination. 10. Note: No ]mown matters otherwise appropriate to be shown have been deleted from this report, which is not a policy of title insurance but a report to facilitate the issuance of a policy of title insurance. For purposes of policy issuance, NO items may be eliminated on the basis of an indemnity agreement or other agreement satisfactory to the company as insurer. 11. The effect of documents, proceedings, liens, decrees or other matters which do not specifically described said land, but which, if any do exist, may effect the title or impose liens or encumbrances thereon. The name search necessary to ascertain the existence of such matters has not been completed and will require a statement of information from the Seller in order to complete this report. ML:bd Policy Rate: Enclosures: Plats SIQ__:JRE(S) RF7Q[IRED FOR TITLE S=I As of the date hereof, the party(ies) whose signature(s) will be necessary, under the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act, on the Certificates consenting to the recordation of the Final Map or Parcel Map of said land and offering for dedication any streets, roads, avenues and other easements offered for dedication by such map are: Thomas H. Taylor, Richard B. Taylor and Richard B. Taylor, Trustee under the Richard B. Taylor California Trust, as Owners of said land. , 620- 19 r.c. A. 0/6-074 NZ SEC 4 TSS. R6E. s/urni 17:is is. rPIPr°C2H�TerPly��._�n'a_L 1y�� is O55./ea tO Sfrae ltrr0i'r =a' 6Y rea lSo^"'y;ric," BK °y reriance t°liabwn, 653 eroon.•• x jANK OH. 2 33 F: I /6 /6.:5 Ac1 : I /3 /4 NO. 12 /9 NO. I 2 /4 ,•/7 / I :9.35tAc (40.66) �(4C.52) I- /40.391 /tAfI DJF O51 i�^Y I I � '. zo.z 7 Q Q 08 O /6 91744 0/ Ir = ,a / 2/ It o 75./Si41 7 I V II l \ n I fI CA TA GLO PLAT - R/S J41j8 20 R 5 67197 A55ES50R'5 YAP 6W.620 PG 9 RIVERS/CE COUNTY, LAG/F. SEPT.F_57 n 73-510 FRED WAKING DRIVE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA92260 TELEPHONE(619)346-0611 June 5, 1989 DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING AND SAFETY PRELIMINARY REVIEW OF PLANS THIS IS NOT A PLAN CHECK! DEVELOPMENT: BARCON DEVELOPMENT TT 24530 Future plans must be submitted to the _Department of Building & Safety for plan review: Architectural Drawings and Details. Structural Drawings and Calculations. Complete Electrical , Mechanical and Plumbing Plans and Specifications. Title 24 Energy Conservation Documentation Forms. COMMENTS: No comments at this time for subdivision map only. N LE PRINCIPAL PLANS EXAMINER KW:djb ,soli;.• ,x, ., ar f�, � r -...� __�r,i.,, _ +,�t� 2'%�{Y"�" `;fy�'�►r '','�' t .."N,. '�' ,�J►•-._ - - .. _ a., !� '�C'> .AY..�SS^ m. ow .x ,'"�J ns• ��t REA( ESTATE M Afi FORATION SERVICES - 1-800-577-9553 P PRCEI LIST ER-ST6E 'fII88-89�— GF-�4�� � �RCE 6 2 O 020 G O O 2 3 OWNER DOCUMENT DATE / No. ASSESSED LOT SIZE Z ADDRESS (-MAIL, A-PROP LOC, c-SAME) ZIP SALE DATE / AM,OLNT VALUES IMP SIZ[TRA PROPERTY DESCRIPTION /TAXES i 626 02% ��[3FTiRRY-DESERT-FALLS-INC-TCHT- —�?U787"--tC%7D2-oTT-55Z00-CAI:—I�Q- - .t�, ^ C/O BEST BEST 8 KRIEGER, 600 TAHOUITZ WAY STE C 10/87 5,000,000 ^S 173,071 STIR ' 18-13,4 PALM SPRINGS CA 42262 USE- RX 50,000 B/P ' 2.70 AC NET IN LOT 103 MB 132/085 TR 15000-1 ZONE-PP.3 4 ---EXCEPTIONAL RESID (NO COMPS) - 2c_U.78 /87 271 NET - 3,86 ____________________ - G2V 023 GHIRLPUOL LEASING SERVIES iNC ----------'--"--'--"-'- ---- > C/ ) 'WKIRLPOOL CORP, 2000 MG3 TAX OEPT, BENTON 84,541 LAID 2.70 18-064 ^ HAPBOR MI 49022 USE-O LE /J 1111 DESERT FLS PKY, PALM DESERT REF.P'N 000067018, 2.70 AC NET 1N LOT 103 ME 132/085 TP. 15000-1, LSD EO DESERT FALLS C C --• MISC. I EASED EQUIPMENT -- _ _ GIG C ---"'--------- ------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------- I AT OZG 024 C25 VILLAS 747 EUGENE RD, PALM SPRINGS 92264 NGS CA LESER FALLS (PT) 10/87 309087 STN 21,794 LND 1.27 If 747 EU � NON-TAX 1.28 AC NET IN LOT E M8 132/085 TR 15000-1 USE- YY -- VACANT LAND -- ZONE-PR3 `____________ _____ _________ ___________.__________________________________________ I _________________________________ ['et L[ U,'6y V11 !_AS AT (,ESERT FALLS (PT) 10/87 309087 577 2 607,150 LND 40.10-- 747 EUGEt:E RD, PALM SPRLvGS CA 92264'Q'+5 40.11 AC N/L IN POP LOT E M 6,Q36.66 !8/ __? 132/085 IR 15CjO- USE- YR -- -- VACANT - RESIDENTIAL -- 6eA ,• ran ! , 2. VILLAS Ai UE1;R. FALLS (P1) __________________ ______ ____________________ _•,-._ ___ _ 747 ELGENE 'U, PALM SPRIu!IS CA G ____l0/8/ 309087 STT 1,547,000 LND 23.80 O y18-UG4 2254 23.8U AC :I/L IN POR PAR 3 PM 100/CY/U PM 1840 USE- YR -- VACANT - RESIDENTIA! -- ------ _______________________u______________.________________________________-__________________________________--_-_-____-___-___________ I 6[6 ! ti ,�G2a_020 031� MUkk! rESERT FALLS INC (CR) 12/87 368039 NON 3,958,236 LND 163.18 1/0 BEST PEST g KRIEGEP,, 600 TAHOUIT2 WAY STE C 221,731 STIR �18-095 ^ PALM SPRINGS CA 62262 USE- RX 4,179,967 NET 163.18 AC M/L IV POR LOT 104 ME 132/085 TR 15000-1 -- EXCEPTIONAL RESID (NO COMPS) -- ------ - --- ----------------------------------- --------------------' 4126 030 UU1 DEL SAFARI MUTUAL 'WATER CO (CR) 1,Z70 LND czc Qc hIQ19> P 0 BOX 1356, PALM DESERT CA 9i261 36,490 SIR 7,-0i2 k 39555 COLUMBUS RD PALM DESERT USE- YS 37 Q NET .23 AC IN POR NE 114 Of SEC 3 15S Roc FOR TOrA'_ LONE-W2 39g76,38 /87 DESCRIPTION SEE ASSESSORS MAPS VACANT - MISC. IMPROVEMENTS -- _-_-- 526 030 004 TANDIKA CORP (CR) - - - - ------�- b2G C16 75800 AVONDALE DR, PALM DESERT CA 92260 3/80 49458 NON 82,164 LND 18.92 75-012 , 3901'. DEL SAFARI DR PALM DESERT 866.84 /87 18.93 AC M/L IN PbR SE 1/4 OF SEC 3 T5S R6E FOR USE- RX TOTAL DESCRIPTION SEE ASSESSORS i:APS ?ONE-W2 -- EXCEPTIONAL ______ RESID (NO COMPS) -- _-_ 62G (^ 626 630 006 TANDIKA CORP (LR) """ "'--'- '-'-- ` 75800 AVONDALE OR PALM DESERT CA 92260 909 LND 8712 75-012 p 39011 DEL SAFARI 6R, PALM DESERT USE- RX 44,457 NSTIR ET .21 AC NET IN PAR 1 PM 104/096 PM 1606 45 .58 NET t -- EXCEPTIONAL RESID (NO CAMPS) ZONE-W2 47�.58 /fi/ --------`------------ __ 626 030 0-17 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------I --.--_ T AN1580 CARP (CR) ^) 855 LND 23.QU ` 1523. AVONDALE DR, PALM DESERT CA 92260 1,055.50 /87 i 75-012_ TOTAL AC M/LCRI IN NOR NE SSE OF SEC 3 TSS R6E FOR USE- RX \\ TOTAL DESCRIPTION SEE ASSESSORS MAPS ZONc_W2 1 - EXCEPTIONAL RESID (NO COMPS) - \ j _ REAL ESTATE INFORMATIONSERVICES 1-800-5-, 7-9663 AWC 653 390 011 OWNER. DOCUMENTDATE /DATEMOUN NO. F ADDRESS (--MAIL 9-PROP LOC ZIP SAL E, SAME) SSESbE SIZE IRA PROPERTY D EjCOTICN AT A VALUES D LOT SIZE 65. IMP 2, /TAXES up R C,X 5 THEaMAL CA 92274 2178 30,000 S 2'E34 187 1 b-1.'3 30.00 AC IN POP. NE 1/4 OF SEC 33 T45 k6E FOR T,--.IAL USE- YY DES':RIPTjr'N. SEE ASSESSORS MAP ZONE- W2 ''ACA.Ni LAND -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------I------------------------------------------- 653 3"Ij '02, :AVID F^EE(,�4,N & CC, INC ('P) 4/78 7-654 2(1 535 LNI, I C/O RAf S�iEL5Y, P 0 EOX 501, THE-:.*AL CA 92274 1 9.65 4 61-u19 9.65 AC' MIL i.N .'CR NE 1/4 OF SEC 33 T4S k,�,E FOR j J�l TOTAL DESCklrTi_-N SEE ASSESSORS MAPS USE- YY -- VACANT LAND -- ZONE- . 3 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 653 390 013 SOUTHERN PACIFIC TkANSPCF.TATICN Co (xX) I - C/O SOUTHERN PACIFIC ]RANSPORTA, 1 MARKET ST, SAN LND 7.55 1 653 NON-TAX FRANCISCO CA 94105 7.55 AC M/L IN POR NE 1/4 OF SEC 33 T4S ?ISE FOR TOTAL DESCRIPTION SEE ASSESSORS MAPS, Se -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 653 "'vO 016 DAVID FREEDMAN 9 CO INC (CR) --------- I P 0 BOX 501, THEF,",Al CA *�2274 __"33�k LNt� 7v.82 le-073 79.82 AC M/L IN FC_' N': 1 '4 OF SEC 33 T4S R6E Fvk USE- YO 87 TOTAL DESCRIPTIuN ;EE AS I-ESSCRS MAP VACANT DESERT LAND ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------- 653 3'�o 017 C,AVID FREEDMAN & CO INC l(R) -- --------- �111J 338 LND 7i'-_l - P 0 BOX 501, TrF;.'AL - A '122741 14- 18-473 79.60 AC MI L' il POR N'� 1/4 OF SEC 33 T45 RISE FOR 32�.90 TOTAL ' DESCRIPTION SEEASSESSORS MAP USE- Y[- VACANT DESERT LANr. --- --- --- ------ ------- -- ---- 653-4cou ul� WEISZ, SYLVIA, TR (FI)------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MILLER k, TR (FI) 1/84 1227 T;�N p71 463 _Ntl 1 C-4.I 18-073 - 1931 35,441.26 S BROADWAY STE 251 LIDS ANGELES CA 90007 USE- yp 4 104.72 AC NET IN FAR S PM 105/658 P.M 18403 Z11-NE-W2 VACANT - RESIDENTIAL ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- -- -- 53x400l(il7,j U11YAN, MjRTC;N 8 � ANDREE FI) 12/85 'q; N 762 5A3--------- - ------ --- ,�C/O MuTC,N UL�nAN P ) E-x 2562, PALM SFRITNCS L 922�3 18-073 59.33 AC M/L IN PC.3 `.E 1/4 OF SEC 33 T4S RISE FOR USE- YY y '7 TOTAL DESCRIPTION SEE ASSESSORS MAP VACANT LAND ------------------------—--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 653 400 018 WEISZ, SYLVIP, TR (FI) MILLER R TR (FAY 12/1.8 1 5 - 275658 NCN 571 629 LND 52.30 18-073 1931 S'BROADWAY STE 251, LOS ANGELES CA 90007 42.3Z�.50 /87 52.30 AC M/L IN PAR 2 PH 105/058 PM 1840 USE- YP VACANT - RESIDENTIAL ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 653�ZOO WEISZ, SYLVIA, TR (FI) MILLER R, TR (FAY 12/85 275658 NON 791 662 LND 94.82 18-073 193S S BROADWAY STE 251 LOS ANGELES CA 61,996.90 /87 653 4 94.82 AC M"L IN PAR 1'PM 105/058 PM 1840 90007 USE- YP VACANT - RESIDENTIAL ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 653 410 001 HAWN W R If 4/69 327?.Cl 293,160 LND 255.73.40 REPUBLIC NATi- SK 2'_DG, DALLAS TX 75201 44,889 STR 255.73 AC M/L IN PCR N 112 OF SEC 34 T45 RISE FOR USE- Cl 338 1,149 NET TOTAL OESCRiPTIUN SEE ASSESSORS MAP ! CIMMERCIAL PROPERTY -- ZONE- W2 4,816.92 167 - ------------------ ---------- PHN-(214) 744-2893 --------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- 08 01 p _0 "Wilt om Now REAL ESTATE INFORtVATION SERVICES - I-bjO-527- :t63 f Ong - 1; ARCS 1620 190 006 lQNER DOILU�IENT DATE NO. ASSESSED LOT SIZE ADDRESS (t-MAIL #-PROP LOC, =-SAME) ZIP SALE DATE I AMOUNT VALUES IMP SIZE i 620 IRA PROPERTY DESCPI�TION /TAXES :—F21J T U OUP KU TROTTER CIR, LAS VEGAS NV E:107 10.('C: A` i.4 FCR NE 1/4 OF SEC 4 T5S RII.E FOR T0-,Al_ USE- YY ;I-1-N SE' ASSESSORS MAPS ZCaE- R112M VACANT LIND ----------------------------------------------------------------------- IFIL--k, THOMAS H & RICHARI, 8 (Fl) 12/77 b 10.00 255308; e, -4L) TIRCTTER CIR, LAS AS VEGAS N'.- `'i!: 7 -074 10,1 AC 1.4 �, R u E I C. SEC T. . I tC 4 155 R6E FOR " :AL US" YY I: ;CCeIPTIC-,. SEE ASSESSORS MAPS ZONE- R112M VAI,',Nl :.AND -------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 620 !9u occ TAYLOR, THOMAS M & RICHARD L (FI) 12/77 25,308 A,4LO LNE, 5.00 820 TROTTER CIA, :_AS VEGAS N" 891;`7 1,� 2 1'.-074 5.U0 AC IN POR k 1/4 OF SEC 4 T5S RtE FOR TC-TAL' USE- f 36,e.58 /87 DESCRIPTION SEE ASSESSORS MAP ZONE- R112M VACANT LAND -- ____________________------------__________---------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------- - 19f! rxfv TAYL-:,R, T�ONAS H & RICHARD E (FI) 12177 25o3U8 e 44.0 LND 820 I,.,) CIP, '_AS VEGAS NV ?1()7 /87 5.00 IC ;N F`Cza NE I/-' OF cc. L 753 Rt,E F-.-k I -. FAL USE- YY DESCRIPTION SEE ASSESS^kS -.AP ZONE- R112:1 LIND - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- :,v oll TA': (-;., IAS h RICIARO 8 (FI) 12177 2583(,8 4,0 4 cle LAS 1A-6'4 AC IN P'-'k NE 1 .4 " SEC 4 T5S R6F. F6R TI-TAL US;_ �:SCRIP, SEE AS54SS-_-RS MAPS ZONE- R112M VACANT LAND -- f620-190-013--------TAYLrJR,_RlCe.'kD_e,_lR-------------------------------------5/86_____ 12H-3I_TF.N----35,63S_LN:!------4.72----------- 820 TROTTER CIR, LAS VEGAS NV 89107 A,446.36 ;7 18-074 9.72 AC M/L IN PC-;t NE 1/4 OF SEC 4 T5S P6E FC'k USE- Yk TOTAL DESCRIPTION SEE ASSESS,'RS MAP .'ACANT - RESIDENTIAL --------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ llic, 014 TAILVR, RICHARD E, IP 5/g6 122831 T;N 315,11!S ',.72 11 320 TROTTER CIR, LAS VEW NV 81107 18-074 9.7 -6 2 AC M/L IN PCR NE 1/4 OF SEC 4 75; Rd-E i6k USE- Tk TOTAL DESCRIPTION SEE ASSESSORS MAP VACANT - RESIDENTIAL 6201196'( - TAYLOR THOMAS H 9 RICHARD B (FI) 12i65 275659 NON 117,237 LND 56.55 * 22911 CALLE AZORIN LAKE MISSION VIED CA 92692 39,746.74 Ye? 18-071 56.55 AC M.L IN kR NE 1/4 OF SEC 4 T53 R6E FOR USE- YY "o 2 T07AL DESCRlPTIC-N SEE ASSESSORS MAPS VACANT LAND -- 620 140 JOHN R, TR & JUD17H A T,R 1/86 8559 TRN 18 727 LND 9.17 JW�6 M�.-PTON, 316 LA RAMBLA, SAN CLEMENT9 CA 92672 8,5W18 /87 18-074 9.17 AC M/L IN POR NE 1/4 OF SEC 4 T55 P6h FOR USE- YY 620 TOTAL DESCRIPTION SEE ASSESSORS MAP VACANT IAND -- - - ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- li6?0-190 017 TAI.OR, RICHARD 8 TR 5/A6 12>i,31 I;N 748,151 LND 19.17 220 TROTTER CIA, LAS VEGAS NV 89107 19 7W.76 /E7 19.17 AC M/L IN POR NE 114 OF SEC 4 T5-,.R/E F,',-( USE- YR TOTAL DESCRIFTil-IN SEE ASSESSORS MAr-S VACANT - RESIDENTIAL 01 14 �fE ••�-. s3,ays.,.� x.,. _w ~ _ `.. TnI�IEkSTDTA� itJF ORMATiON'SERV CES � ..4:.•r --SAG OET..I- #RE - a 0 527 S � � IIIPPP Aa 6 2 O 1 9 O O 1 H GWNER DOCUr+.ENT DA7E / N0. ASSESSED LOT SIZE f12 P DDRESS (>-MPIL p-PRGP LOC, =-SAME) 2IP SALE DATE AMOUNT VALUES IMP SIZE ' TRA PROPERTY i.ESCkI�TION /TAXES - "6ZiJ-r7Li- -t-7"- - 200 t0U20 101A AVE EDMONTC'N AL CANA(A T5J�62 12/86 12_,C,1110 =,F 42,826i.68 187 18-rj74 16.35 AC M/L IN FOR NW 1/4 OF SEC , T55 4E FOR USE- YR TOTAL DESCRIPTION SEE ASSESSORS MAPS -- VACANT - RESIDENTIAL --• ________________________--_________.______y________-_____________J___-_______________-_-;_________ __________________________________ 621i l411 1114 CITY �•F PALM DESERT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY (XX) 12/86 311916 ITN 1 i' x!i2 > 73510 FRED '14APING DR, PALM DESERT CA 92260 12/8t• ,BCC,_. LND 59.36 •NC:N-TAX 59.36 AC M/L IN FO' N': 1/4 OF SEC 4 T5S RAE FOR USE- Yk TOTAL DESCRIPTION SEE ASSESSORS MAPS -- VACANT - RESIDENTIAL -- - _________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________ ________ 620 1W 020 GEED ENTERPRISES INC (FI) 12/_' 3085'4 F5(; 67 7_4 LNC 2.32 --" - 200 10020 101A AVE EL,-lONTC'N AL CANAUA T5J3G2 12/86 125,000 >F 6,08E.34 187 i 18-074 2.32 AC M/L IN PSR NW 1/4 OF SEC 4 T55 RtE FOR USE- YR - TOTAL DESCRIPTION SEE ASSESSORS MAP -- VACANT - RESIDENTIAL -- _ __-_--____________--_____________—_____________ _________________-_______---___----__ 620 190 021 CITY OF PALM DESERT REDEVELOPMENT GENCY (Xx1 12/86 311916 STN 2,190,074 LND 75.15 620 I = 73510 FRED WAk1NG DR, PALM UEiE�tT CA 92260 12/86 6,005,500 <'( NC•N-TAX 75.15 AC M/L IN POR NW 1/4 (IF SEC 4 T5S R6E FOR USE- YR TOTAL DESCRIPTION SEE ASSEFiikS MATS -- VACANT - kESIDENTIAL -- _____________________________________________________ ___ __ _ __ _ _ ______________ ___________ 620 2CO C:L1 Si E:-CL, 'W ILI'IA-1, TR 8 JOAN, TR __ _________7/81_____133648 P1 ______8_I_/5 LN-_____-5.00 �v5U1 aILSHInE ELV .YG[U�, L"S AhtSELES CA 9U0�4 ,38+.5�� /�i 64v . j 18-082 5.00 AC IN POR SW 1/4 OF SEC 4 T55 R6E FCR TOTAL USE- YY DESCRIPTION SEE ASSESSORS MAP ZO:+E- R112M -- 'VACANT LAND -- j _______________________--- __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 620 200 002 DOZE GARY 8 KERSTIN (CP) 1/79 18307 23 665 LND 5.00 = 2107 OXFORD ST, SACRAMENTO CA 95815 1/79 10,OL i) S 1,551.52 187 ! 18-082 5.00 AC 1N FOR SW 1/4 OF SEC 4 T53 R6E FOR TOTAL USE- YY 62U DESCRIPTION SEE ASSESSORS MAP ZONE- R112M - -- VACANT LAND -- I 2! 1 U(J3 VARSI, CYNTHIA J TR 6/81 101436 TRN 8 232 LND 5.U•J ! ** C/O OI'Vl TR'USf, 1910 ^ILL AD, SOUTH PASADENA C 91Ci30 1,38S.32 /$7 ---• 18-U82 5.00 AC IN FOR SW 1/4 OF SEC 4 T5S R6E FOR TOTAL USE- YR n2) i DESCRIPTION SEE ASSESSORS MAP ZONE- R1121,, -- VACANT - RESIDENTIAL -- _____-______-_—_____C___--___________________—____________________________________________________—________—__`.._-___________ 620 200 004 FOR_YTH TIMOTHY L B JANICE G UT) 1/76 1,57 8 136 LND ..00 _ - • 2291� EVALYH AVE, TORRANCE CA - 90505 1/76 4,000 S 1 8�.28 /87 I ---- 18-082 5.00 AC IN FOR SW 1/4 OF SEC 4 T5S R6E FOR TOTAL USE- YY - - 1 620 i DESCRIPTION SEE ASSESSORS MAP ZONE- R112M -_VACANT LAND -- ; ____________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 620 200 005 LAURENZANO BEVERLY C (SE) 2/82 20411 ISN 23 665 LND 5.0'0 222 POP.f ROYAL AVE, FOSTER CITY CA 94404 1,555.52 /87 ----- 18-082 5.00 AC IN POR SW 1/4 OF SEC 4 T5S R6E FOR TOTAL USE- YY l 620 DESCRIPTION SEE ASSESSORS MAP ZFNE- R112M -- VACANT LAND -- - - --------------------------------------------------------------~--------------------------- ---6--------- h20 20C1 0N16 LAURENZANO BEVERLY C (SE)�.-._ 2182 20c11 ISN X 6, LND 5.00 222 PORE ROYAL AVE, FOSTER CITY CA 94U4 1,555.52 /A? ---- 18-0r2 5.00 AC IN POR S.+ 1/4 ^° SEC 4 T5S R6E FOR TOTAL I1S E- YY i DESCRIPTION SEE ASSES.._.:S MAP ZONE- R112M.. -- VACANT LAND -- �` B 15 ,y y ogzgq��pq�- I;! Z. ;5� wm . ........ ' PEAL EST ATE J�jF0RttA',0N SERVICES 1-800-527-96 6 3tA V Gr-"-T-5---t 71 WK r I 1 620 200 029 C�"E R DOCUMENT DATE 'I NO. ASSESSED LOT SIZE AOtkEz; (*-MAIL, X-FR'-F LOC, =-:A.':E) ZIP SALE DATE / AMOUNT VALUES IMP SI:E 62 IPA PR(FERiY DESCRIPTION /TAXES —=70r-w4 .51?—. 6&?83_'rT__23T_.235 LN , 19451 15TH AVE, SURREY 9C CANA-)A V3S 5J9 3/84 450,000 N 2,591Y.96 /87 1 2 4.67 AC IN POR SW 1/4 OF SEC 4 75S R6E FOR TOTAL USE- YR b E,CF.IPTICN SEE ASSESSORS i"AP Z..'jNE_ Rilili VACANT - RESIDENTIAL -- -------------------------------------------- _____________________________________________________________________________ ------------ f 266 LND lo.c.0 16�20W21V 63�( TAY,- IXOMAS H 12/86 "15458 (�N 173 41 620 L, TR 12/86 -�il'SV2 •p 4-J-7a /37 1�'-U?4 C/O DAVII-50N, 3433 W *:HA : AVE STE 100, USE- N, FRESNO CA 93711 ZONE- R112M 1(;.1-AJ AC IN F'.P 5; 1/4 OF SEC 4 T55 ktE F-_-3 TOT'-1 DESCRIPTION SEE AiZES;---RS -.A,S VAC.*%Ni - RESIDENTIAL feU 620 200-031--------FORMA-(PT)----------------------------- ----------------10/85-----23130-3-S7T----649-458 LN D 20.00 ----------- - F 0 BOX 47, PALM DESERT CA 92261 12,1MI.34 /87 - 18-074 20-00 AC 14 POR SE 1/4 OF SEC 4 .�S R6E FOR TOTAL ' USE- YR DEi(kIPTI(!, SEE - MAPS ZONE- R112M --- VACANI - RESIDENTIAL :- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 420 2i0 :_:'� I - 2/85 2?280 STY 2,65�,M LND 38."t. c .1 (PT) , C,,'- ROY W7LLIA,11 '.lu W LfS --UNA: EAm ?I85 2'500'Gorj F 18-074 a GAt�RIEL CP 91776 L*'AN- 1,875,000 38.66 AC M/L 14 F E 114 iEC 4 T5S ReE FOR USE- YR I-'TAL DE� E: ASSESSrE:S MAPS ZONE- R112M 620 20K) 039 eEFKEY, rEORGE (MS) 12/85 295525 STT 195 075 LND - - -------- - --------------- ---------------------- - ---- - ------------- --------------- ?3640 EL PASE0, PALM I,f3ERT CA 9?260 12/85 825,000 �N 2,16L24 /87 18-082 5.00 AC 1.4 KR SW 1/1. OF SEC T3S P6( FOR TOTAL USE- YD DESCRIPTION SEE ASSESSORS MAPS, GOVT Pk(L ' A'ANT DESERT L/ND ________-----------------------—--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 620 2(ii 042 COOK FARTHERS LTD PARTNERSHIP -'I) 6/-�4 1/.0439 SIT 4 113 241 1 NC, 36.99 > C/O CARVER COMPANIES, 110 W '_Ai T.,NAz irk, SAN 6E606.58 ;E7 - GAeRIEL CA 91776 CY 99 AC M/L IN P-_R H 1/4 OF SEC 4 755 R6F. FCk TOTAL DESCRIPTION SEE ASSESSORS MAPS VACANT COMMERCIAL FROFERTY -------------—------- -------—---—--—------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 620 200 043 DESERT CITIES BAPTIST CHURCH ( R) 6/78 123424 53 246 LND 5.al - P 0 BOX 2215, PALM DESERT CA 92260 8,26�.96 187 18-082 4.25 AC VACANT LAND M/L IN POR SW li4 Of SEC 4 T55 A6E FOR USE- �Y 620 TOTAL DESCRIPTION SEE ASSESSORS MAP ------------------ -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------—--- 620 200 (141. BERKEY GEORGE (MS) 12/85 295525 SIT 195 075 LND 4.25 � 736EU EL PASEO PALM DESERT CA 92260 12/85 825,000 �N 2116E24 /87 18-082 4.25 AC M/L IN POR SW 1/4 OF SEC 4 T5S R6E FOR USE- YD i 620 TOTAL DESCRIPTION SEE ASSESSORS MAPS, GOVT PRCL ---- VACANT DESERT LLEND---------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 620 200 045 BERKEY, GEORCE (MS) 12/85 295�25 s-'T 195e('75 LND 4.25 e 72,640 EL PASEO PALM DESERT CA 92260 12/85 825,000 N 2,16e.24 187 18-082 4.25 AC M/L IN POR SW 1/4 OF SEC 4 T5S R6E FOR LSE- YD -7- TOTAL DESCRIPTION SEE ASSESSORS MAPS, GOVT PRCL VACANT DESERT LANE) __________________.________________--______-_-__________-__ E 15 57" REAL ESTATE INFORMATION SERVICES 1-800-52 7-9663 RiFy FAIR=LIST- ry Z�176 j FAI 1620 200 046 OWNER DOCUMENT DATE W. ASSESSED 0T SIZE ADf)kESS 0-MAIL, #-PROP LOC, =-SAME) ZIP SALE D4TE / AMOUNT VALUES IMP SIZE 6 2 IRA PROPERTY DESCRIPTION /TAXES __RTrRAr ---2 D -9 HUM H -TI"5&5�r CT'W--7mr,5Rr� I , L IT. 7 dla DAVIDSON, JAMIE L, TR 12/8t 943,500 �P 12,83S.56 /5 1?-074 ^ C/O JAMIE DAVIDSON, 3433 W SHAW AVE STE 100, USE- YR FRESNO CA 93711 19.62 AC M/L IN POR SE 1/4 OF SEC 4 T5S R6E F,--,R T01,'L bESCRI 'Tli.N SEE ASSESSORS MAPS I VACANT - RESIDENTIAL -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 61-k 20t) 047 TAfOj , RICH�Ril 8 & THCt; AS 12/86 3154'r CP.4 87,622 LND 4.59 DAVIDSrjN, JA�Xllt L 12/86 983,500 .P 187 18-074 - C/o JAMIE 0AV16SCN, 3433 W SHAW AVE STE loo, USE- '(P - FRESNO V 93711 4.59 A-' M/L IN POR SE Ii4 OF SEC 4 155 R6E FOR TOTAL DESCRIPTION SE.- ASSESSORS MAP VACANT - RESIDENTIAL -- ----------------------------- ---------------------------------_______-------------------------------------------------------------- 6el _ i 620 200 048 TAYLOR R'CiARD 8 & THOMAS H 12/86 315458 CPN 87 622 LND 4.59 LAVIDS6N, AMIE L TR 12/86 983,500 P 6,084.30 /87 18-074 C/O J1,4iE DO"16SON, 3433 W- SHAW AVE STE 100, USE- YR FRESNO CA 93711 4.59 AC M/L IN POR SE 1/4 OF SEC 4 15S RAE FOR TOTAL DESCRIPTION SEE ASSESSORS MAP VACANT_- RESIDENTIAL 62c ---------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 620 200 U-? TAYLOR RICHAkl) 8 & THC41AS H 121r6 315458 CPN '1..4 qec LND 19.t2 DAVID'Aq j, JAMIE L, TR 12/e6 983,56�Ul P 12_8tS_56 87 18-074 * C10 AMIE DAVIDSON, 3433 W SHAW AVE STE 100, USE- YR - FRESNO CA 93711 --- 19.62 AC M/L IN POR SE 1/4 -F SEC 4 T5S R6E FC.k Tr-AL bE=CkIPTII'-N :EE A,-�S--RS MAPS VACANT - RESIDENTIAL ---------------— ---------—--------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------—------- 620 200 050 MANOR HEALTHCARE rORP (CR) 3/96 39639 SIT 356,857 LND 4.`9 - 10750 COLUMBIA PIKE, SILVER SPRINGS MD 20901 1 537,800 SIR 18-082 4.59 AC M/L IN POk SW 1/4 OF SEC 4 T5S R6E FOR I USE- cl 1 894 657 NET TOTAL DESCRIPTION SEE ASSESSORS MAPS, GOVT PRCL s 91S.60 18? COfIMERCIAL PROPERTY ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------- 620 200 051 AMY K CORP (CR) 7/84 165716 SIT 24A 546 LND 3.'y5 * C10 BRIAN ZEINER, P 0 BOX 1182, PALM DESERT CA 92261 817M.70 /87 18-082 3.95 AC M/L IN POR SW 1/4 OF SEC 4 T55 R6E FOR USE- YY TOTAL DESCRIPTION SEE ASSESSORS MAP VACANT LAND A.2c, -------------------------—--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------—-------------- 620 211 001 RAWSON, THOMAS & MARLENE J (JT) 8/86 204762 STT 38245 STORY CREEK DR, PALM DESERT CA 51,000 LND 6098 92260 8/86 33,000 -F 5,610 STR 75-027 LOT 188 MB 069/001 TR 4252 USE- RM 7,000-HO CON 1973 MOOB,ILEHOMES ZONE- RT 49 610 NET PHN-(619) 346-5830 731.02 /87 620 -----------------------—--—------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ----------------- - 620 211 002 KARKENNY, SIMON JAMES & MARGA LEWIS (HW) 2/86 33594 STT 52,020 LND 5227 ' 4828 SWINTON AVE, ENCINO CA 91436 2/86 50,000 N 79,735 SIR 75-027 LOT 189 M8 069/001 TR 4252, DUALWIDE PREMIER LOAN- 125,000 131 755 NET MOBILEHOME USE- r4o 1,556.08 /87 ZONE- Ri 61L --- -------------------------------------- ----- -------------------------------- -------------------------- ------------------------- 620 211 VJ3 'THOMPSON, WALTER 8 & SHIRLEY M 9/72 123449 10,881 LND 4356 = 38215 STORY CREEK DR, PALM DESERT CA 92260 3,231 SIR 75-027 LOT 190 ME? 069/001 TA 4252 USE- RM 7,000-110 CON 1'?74 MOBILEHOMES ZONE- RT 7 112 NET PHN-(619) 346-766_5 184.98 /87 ----------------------------------------- ----------- ----------------------------—----------------------------------------- F 15 ! ------::' ORANGE COAST -'LE CO. RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 4 -" PROPERTY OWNERS RECEIVED CERTIFICATION MAY 2 4 1989 ANSD....11 1, BRADLEY C. CCOKRILL certify that on 18 APRIL 1989 the attached property owners list was prepared by ORANGE COAST TITLE COMPANY, pursuant to application requirements furnished by the Riverside County Planning Department. Said list is a complete and true compilation of owner of the subject property and all other property owners within 300 feet of the property involved in the application and is based upon the latest equalized assessment rolls. I further certify that the information filed is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. 1 understand that incorrect or erroneous information may be grounds for rejection or denial of the application. NAME: BRADLEY C. COCKRILL TITLE/REGISTRATION: ORANGE COAST TITLE COMPANY ADDRESS: 1060 E. Washington Street STE # 200 Colton, CA. 92324 PHONE: (714) 825-8800 SIGNATURE: DATE: 18 APRIL 1989 / CASE NO: 620-190-006,007,008,009,011 ,013,014,017 1060 E. WASHINGTON ST. • SUITE 200 • COLTON, CALIFORNIA 92324 • (714)825-8800 • (800)472.8591 • (800)442-4973 OCT M2 1, 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE 1619) 346-0611 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO(S): -� PROJECT: a 7(0 ------ APPLICANT: Enclosed please find materi als 6 describin 70 a requested: g project for which the following is being �9PpVOUgL OF_ ---- S iNGG e —✓�. ..1%vSJ/..�(Lt°N� .-, -- _-�— 9T!r _ ._..__.. %o1L 70 _-CKr �7G_ `� v e FPaf n j"' 'ntuwi ,(4�- Aromas OF /-z7 a -kuuw:..- .4atf W c -.n41 a s o P. g o St+� oNPd p22� OIL.... .5 dweL�rw� -1_ -.5 -- pe a c✓� ,(oc 9T-� O. sT. -. �i*eV -- The attached data was prepared by-- `Pp' --- - ca Is comments and recommended conditions of pproval.t he cityislIn ere edin the probable impacts on the environment (includinglanderp d to You for objects of historical or aesthetic significance) and recommended mineralsp confloratditionsf of anoise pproval auna based on your expertise and area of concern. Your comments and recommended conditions of app prior to 4:30 p.m• roval must be received by this office Su.Oe o a committee. The land div ion l ccy Int order .to be discussed by the land division services, city building official, city rector of engineer, fire marshal and ae (comprised of lrepresentat environmental CVWD) will discuss the comments and recommended conditions of approval and will forard them to the planning commission through the staff report. Any information received by this Office after the receipt deadline will not be discussed by the land division committee. Sincerely, AM �A DIAZ DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES - Attachments v"r--ditiY_ Cd by 10:16 ROM Bbrp;'s Financie,l Group TO Tom Taylor P-303 W m dd01'e Q.'""wi.� If�P �PO��IP'�Gd070 �m�P�•�r"f.Lr0® SUBDIVISION MAP 6a6��a��1�D� i RQ9f�W�S �Q asivicala . iO aoning ddwbtim . Baron 's Financial croup L08�e.Y' aro.tonf f PM4 Min 69-730 w 1 1 gt L-� 4-i0 (01luN�r( ► tl o�unq orer.M 6 91 32s-9> > 1 �i Rancho MirCity a C � �l �/'t �'1ZZl�o T.uptlerl. f. NEOUE9Tt (pr.erfbe sailwNr nofum of APemvil de.ol.41, A li nt seeks aRroval gf TentatiV&-.Trgc:o`v. Map NA, 21530 PgOJ•SAtY OITSCA►a•TION: 90 scree of , vacant land 1 in south OE 8rank Sinatra, and wrrst of Cook Street . - See le al descri tion at ached. •43CSSCA'S PARCEL no. See attache4 CxIIiTINO 20NINE W r Prop./ey OrMr AYIneN;eflpn TTw una.raren.e NOur m.r IMt or. 1 Mr fyl Of In.p/Op/r1 r.1Cn Mallon (Or far Aikq e/nu! rcplr > "Q n.nln Ana n.r.A y ew. esrTno� zwi n rur S /9 gr..T.nl ooNt/Al n. b 0 1 OrtAR of AI 11A0 Ina Nsonvo b A to I Do 8Y My IIIGNATLRf ew ruu enocr......r M r.Id mt/10110n.. . _.. ••••^�ww'�n r• ^0101ro 1% City ./ 14sm Df.orl of all Neeufll.l of Alec 011 ogMkeoN 0 llf. pIOW(1y r..ANo.d hq mytlNd /NtnG710n. gienotvn OS IppHwnl'. ilCnrf�n � 1 ,� •J\ sit ;to 2 3 9 �tafR 1rliC GHN'f 4oa Envlmnm.ntel fllanr. Aa+elor ] YIn10f AOl oy E•A•No. w...irr n f r7 CAtl940e.rfepf Cumpfkn CW� N440Nw OoCl.lgtlAn ] Dsna r A.f.►.AO. Celw N0. 1d3sm wlt$d Jed 6T,60 68, 61 Aw TENTATIVE TRACT 24530 LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND OWNERSHIP Legal Assessor's Amount of Description Numbers Acreage Ownership Ownership Parcel 5 620-190-011 20 ac Richard B. and Thomas Taylor Parcel 6 620-190-006 10 ac it Parcel 7 620-190-008 5 ac it Parcel 8 620-190-009 5 ac it Parcel 9 620-190-007 10 ac " Parcel 2 620-190-013 10 ac Richard B. Taylor, Trustee under Parcel 3 620-190-014 10 ac " Richard B. Taylor California Trust Parcel 4 620-190-017 20 ac Totals 8 90 ac TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 24530 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Proposed Usage: Development of 276 single-family, detached homes on 90 acres of land fronting on Cook and Frank Sinatra Streets. Existing Zoning: Planned Residential, five units per acre (PR-5) . Density: Proposed density is 3 .07 lots per acre. Lot Size and Configuration: Minimum net lot size is 10, 000 square feet, based on design criterion of 80 feet x 125 feet. Average (mean) lot size is 11, 350 square feet. Streets: Streets will be privately owned and maintained within the walled, gated development. Proposed Structures: Size: Houses sizes will be from 1,850 to 3, 000 square feet of net livable area, and most, will have three-car garages. Stories: One-third of the houses will be two-story, which will not exceed 24 feet in height and will not be built within 200 feet of the public streets. The second stories will be set back from the front line of the first stories to eliminate vertical appearance. Exterior Features: All homes will have tile roofs, plastered walls (desert colors) , landscaped front yards, lighted parkway trees, and fenced or walled rear and side yards. Lot Coverage: The footprint of the house and three-car garage will cover less than 37% of the lot. Set-backs: The front and rear set-backs will be a minimum of 20 feet, while the minimum distance between side walls will be 10 feet. Pricing: The homes will be priced from '$165, 000 to $275, 000. Phasing: The property will be developed in twenty-acre phases, beginning at the Cook Street entrance, with each phase containing approximately 62 homes. LASE N0. _ C• , Environmental Assessment Form TO THE APPLICANT: Your cooperation in completing this form and supplying'%the information requested will expedite City review of your application pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. The City is required to make an environmental assessment on all projects which it exercises discretionary approval over. Applications submitted will not be considered complete until all information necessary to make the environmental assessment is complete. GENERAL INFORMATION: .1 . Name. address, and telephone number of owner, applicant or project sponsor: Baron's Financial Group Richard Krotz 69 730 Hwy. 111 Ste #212 Rancho Mirage CA 92270 (619) 328-9111 O • 2. Name, address and telephone number of person t.: be contacted con- cerning the project (such as architec engineer, or o —re- sentative) : Richard Kr z 74-390 Hwy. 111, Pa.-im Desert, CA 92260 `61S 346- 481 3. Common name of project (if any): Palm Desert Colony Estates 4. Project location (street address or general location): West of Cook Street south of Frank Sinatra 5. Precise legal description of property (lot and tract number, or meets & bounds) : Parcel 2 through 9 in Government Lots l & 2 in the NE of Section 4 T 5 5 R 6 E SBBM. See Legal Description and Assessor's Parcel designations attached. 6. Proposed use of the site (project for which the form is filed; describe the total undertaking, not just the current application approval being sought): Divide subject 90 acres into 976 residential lots for sinale-family detached I i- " 7. Relationship a larger project or series o' rojects (describe how this proj....t relates to other activities , ,hases , and develop- ments planned, or now underway) : self=contained project, to be `r' developed in 20-acre phases of approximately 62 lots each. 8. List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, to go forward, including those required by the City, Regional , State and Federal agencies (indicate sub- sequent approval agency name, and type of approval required) : city approval of tentative and final subdivision maps, CVWD approvals of sewer & water facilities,county flood control, California Division of Real Estate, etc. EXISTING CONDITIONS: 9. Project site area: Ninetv acres. Size of property in sq. ft. or acreage 10. Present zoning: PR-5 (Proposed zoning) : PR-5 11 . General Plan land use designation: PR-5 12. Existing use of the project site: Vacant land 13. Existing use on adjacent properties: (Example - North, Shopping Center; South, Single Family Dwellings; East, Vacant, etc. ). ONorth west and south are vacant; east is Desert Falls country club/ i condominium project. 14. Site topography (describe) : revel (less than .5% overall grade) . 15. Are there any natural or manmade drainage channels through or adjacent to the property? NO x YES 16. Grading (estimate number of cubic yards of dirt being moved): 311 000 ruhi r yards 17. List the number, size and type of trees being removed: None 18. Describe any cultural , historic, or scenic aspects of the project site: None G 19. Residential Project (if not residential do NOT answer) A. Number and type of dwelling units (Specify no. of bedrooms) : 276 single-family houses having 3 and 4 bedrooms B. Schedule. of unit sizes: From 1 850 to -3 000 square feet of net livable area. C. Number of stories 2 Height 24 (max) feet. . D. Largest single building. (sq. ft. ) 3.000•gF (hgt. ) 24_feet_ E. Type of household size expected (population projection for the project) : 3.1 persons per household QF. Describe the number and type of recreational facilities : Parks_(retention areas) G. Is there any night lighting of the project: No H. Range of sales prices or rents: $ 165,000 to b 275,000 I. Percent of total project devoted to: Building . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20% % Paving, including streets. . . . . . . . . . . 14% S Landscaping, Open, Recreation Area . . . . . . 66% % C20. C rcial Industrial Institutional or Other Pro 'ect: A. Type 7& number): use(s) and major function(s) (if offices, specify pe B. Number oSquare feet in total building area: C. Number of sto 'es Height feet. D. Largest single b\fet Sq. Ft. ) (Hgt. ) E. Number of squareoutdoor storage area: F. Total number of parking spaces number provided G. Hours of operation: H. Maximum number of clients, p rons , shoppers, etc. , at one time: I. Maximum number of employees at on time: J. If patron seating is involved, state the number: K. Is there any night lighting of the proje Yes No L. Percent of total project devoted to: Building . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . % Paving, including streets. . . . . . . . % Landscaping and Open Space (Recreation). . . % Are the items a the ect or in le ts Discuss belowwall items checkedbyest(attachadditionaltsheetscas Cnecessary). i YES NO 21 . Change in existing features of hillsides, X or substantial alteration of ground contours. 22. Change in the dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors X in the project vicinity. 23. Subject to or resulting in soil errosion by wind — X or flooding. 24. Change in ground water quality or quantity, or alteration of existing drainage patterns. _ X 25. Change in existing noise or vibration level in the vicinity. Subject to roadway or airport noise (has the required acoustical report been X submitted?) O26. Involves the u3a or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic substances , X flammables or explosives. 27. Involves the use of substantial amounts of X fuel or energy. 28. Changes thQ demand for municipal services X (police, fire, sewage, etc. ) 29. Changes the demand for utility services , beyond those presently available or planned in the near future. see 28 30. Significantly affects any unique or natural X features, including mature trees. 31 . Change in scenic views or vistas from existing X residential areas or public land or public roads. 32. Results in the dislocation of people. X C YES NO 33. Generates controversy based on aesthetics or �— other features of the project. [ ] Additional explanation of "yes" answers attached. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and eh exhibits tet the data a information required for thisinitialevaluaton, o the best ofmyabilityand that the facts, statements and information presented are true and correct to the best of My,knowledge and belief. Richard J. Krotz Baron's Financial Group Name Prin or T pe For ( May 2 1989 Signat re Date <J INITIAL STUDY FEE: • $30. 00 (Make check payable to. the city of Palm Desert and sub- mit with this form. ) ASSESSOR'S PARCEL MAP + 013 • 014 ' w • iiN• • it y0 " 06 07 08 , 09 • e 1�lPOR 1 n 4 ' r 620-190-011 017too* low 7 OR �� , » �� �s � t iao � •to �i Be' (.so•yo-a�j o 691 X t 90. \ • 1\ar•aloo•�Ir y a � 0 j •r Blow' ...� : 9? • • • ICI J C"Iar C4440 — � J IU r �k\ •N' IW tryl 620_19 r.c.a. 018-074 N 2 SEC. 4 T. 5S. R.6E. •eferl^B erelra:- +A:;. urr as'^I^eR at eels ree cC...r+.C,`.'':i.��a•e '9 l( a• -'. el h M0 son of_,.;e:lt; eon Yaw BK. `^rrerre^ostee 'er 653 32 I33 5 sFRANKUm. s 3 400, Y1 /6.lJ Art ` , '• I /3 /4 - NO. 2 1 19 N0. I 2 (4 ,47 / I- 59.36 4e. (40.66) 521 (40.59) 36.J3 4k tn I I OJ O}l i '•\ I I W n rr Jr i Q Q Q 6 � r ^ /' A04k I �1 NO. 1 Il. . _ - U 3 • � _ -- - re 1 i z/ i 11 i, . ,rr VAr4 GLO P[Ar R/S. 34139 20 P S 67197 1 ASSESSOR'S NAP SY.620 PG. 9 R/VERSICE COONrr, GAur SEPr.,Y57 TENTATIVE TRACT 24530 KEY PARTIES INVOLVED IN DEVELOPMENT Principal• Baron's Financial Group Richard J. Krotz, Owner 69730 Hwy 111, Suite 212 Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 (619) 328-9111 Engineer• Charles Haver and Associates Tom Lagier Charles Haver 74390 Hwy 111 Palm Desert 92260 (619) 346-7481 Architect• George W. Jelks, A.I.A. 31 Mainsail Drive Oceanside, CA 92054 (619) 722-5656 Title Company• Orange Coast Title Company Mindy Logan 1060 E. Washington St. , Suite 200 Colton, CA 92324 (800) 472-8591 G R A N COAST T I TLE COM A N Y 1060 E. Washington Street, Suite 200 Colton, California 92324 (714) 825-8800 --PRELIMINARY REPORT— Baron Financial 69730 Hwy. 111, Ste. 212 Rancho Mirage, California 92270 Date: April 24, 1989 Attention: Richard Krotz Your No. Tr 24530 Order No. R-70789-4 Dated as of April 12, 1989 at 7:30 A.M. In response to the above referenced application for a policy of title insurance, the insurer hereby reports that it is prepared to issue, or cause to be issued, as the date hereof, a Policy or Policies of Title Insurance describing the land and the estate or interest therein hereinafter set forth, insuring against loss which may be sustained by reason of any defect, lien or ernwnbrance not shown or referred to as an Exception below or not excluded from coverage pursuant to the printed Schedules, Conditions and Stipulations of said policy forms. The printed Exceptions and Exclusions from the coverage of said Policy or Policies are set forth in Schedule 1 and Schedule 1 (continued) attached. Copies of the Policy forms should be read. They are available from the office which issued this report. This report (and any supplements or amendments hereto) is issued solely for the purpose of facilitating the issuance of a policy of title insurance and no liability is assumed hereby. If it is desired that liability be assumed prior to the issuance of a policy of title insurance, a Binder or Commitment should be requested. K[NDY IAGAN Title Officer The form of policy of title insurance contemplated by this report is: "A Subdivision Guarantee" The estate or interest in the land hereinafter described or referred to covered by this Report is: A Fee as to Parcel 1 to 5 and 7 to 9; an Easement as to Parcel 6. Title to said estate or interest at the date hereof is vested in: Thomas H. Taylor and Richard B. Taylor, as to Parcels 1 through 6; Richard B. Taylor, Trustee, under the Richard B. Taylor California Trust, as to Parcels 7, 8 and 9, subject to Item No. 8 of this Report Order No. R-70789-4 The land referred to in this Report is situated in the State of California, County of Riverside and is described as follows: Tentative Tract No. 24530 more particularly described as follows: do r .4 The half of the North one-half of the Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of ion 4, Township 5 South, Range 6 East, San Bernardino Base and Meridian; Also described tand t one-half of the North one-half of the West one-half of Lot 1 in the Not of Section 4, To 5 South, Range 6 East, San Bernardino Baseeridian; Also Excepting rom one-half of oil and mineral rights as reserved by Lucille Sleeper in document recorded 20, 1956, it Book 1883, page 571 of Official Records of Riverside County, Califo PARCEL 2: The West one-half of the following described property: The Northwest quarter of the Southeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 4, Township 5 South, Range 6 East, San Bernardino Base and Meridian. PARCEL 3: The West one-half of the North one-half of the Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 4, Township 5 South, Range 6 East, San Bernardino Base and Meridian; Also described as the West one-half of the North one-half of the West one-half of Lot 1 in the Northeast quarter of Section 4, Township 5 South, Range 6 East, San Bernardino Base and Meridian; Excepting therefrom one-half of all oil and mineral rights as reserved by Lucille Sleeper in document recorded March 20, 1956, in Book 1883, page 571 of Official Records of Riverside County, California. PARCEL 4: The East one-half of the following described property: The Northwest quarter of the Southeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 4, Township 5 South, Range 6 East, San Bernardino Base and Meridian. PARCEL 5: The South one-half of the Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 4, Township 5 South, Range 6 East, San Bernardino Base and Meridian; County of Riverside, State of California. Also described as the South one-half of the West one-half of Lot 1 in the Northeast quarter of Section 4, Township 5 South, Range 6 East, San Bernardino Base and Meridian; Continued Continued: Order No. R-70789-4 Excepting therefrom one-half of all oil and mineral rights as reserved by Lucille Sleeper, a widow, to Samuel D. Arner, an unmarried man, dated February 23, 1956 and filed for record March 20, 1956. PARCEL 6: An easement for road purposes over the North 20 feet of the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 4, Township 5 South, Range 6 East, San Bernardino Base and Meridian. PARCEL 7: The South half of the Southeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 4, Township 5 South, Range 6 Fast, San Bernardino Base and Meridian. EXCEPTING the Easterly 44 feet as granted to the County of Riverside by Instrument recorded June 4, 1962 as Instrument No. 51903, of Official Records of Riverside County, California. PARCEL 8: The West half of the West half of the West half of Government Lot 2 of the Northeast quarter of Section 4, Township 5 South, Range 6 East, San Bernardino Base and Meridian; Excepting therefrom one-half of all oil and minerals, as reserved by Lucile Sleeper by Deed recorded December 14, 1961 as Instrument No. 107309 of Official Records of Riverside County, California. PARCEL 9: The East half of the West half of the West half of Government Lot 2 of the Northeast quarter of Section 4, Township 5 South, Range 6 East, San Bernardino Base and Meridian; Excepting therefrom one-half of all oil and minerals, as reserved by Lucile Sleeper by Deed recorded December 14, 1961 as Instrument No. 107309 of Official Records of Riverside County, California. At the date hereof exceptions to coverage in addition to the Exceptions and Exclusions in said policy form would be as follows: A. General and Special Taxes for the fiscal year 1989-1990. A lien not yet payable. B. Any Bonds will be reported later. c. Second Installment General and Special Taxes for the fiscal year 1988- 1989, $1,285.53, plus penalty of $128.55, plus costs of $10.00, Code Area 018074, Assessors Parcel No. 620-190-007-7, Exemption $none. D. Second Installment General and Special Taxes for the fiscal year 1988- 1989, $655.82, plus penalty of $65.58, plus costs of $10.00, Code Area 018074, Assessors Parcel No. 620-190-008-8, Exemption $none. Continued 14 continued: Order No. R-70789-4 E. Second Installment General and Special Taxes for the fiscal year 1988- 1989, $1,285.53, plus penalty of $128.55, plus costs of $10.00, Code Area 018074, Assessors Parcel No. 620-190-006-6, Exemption $none. F. Second Installment General and Special Taxes for the fiscal year 1988- 1989, $655.82, plus penalty of $65.58, plus costs of $10.00, Code Area 018074, Assessors Parcel No. 620-190-009-9, Exemption $none. G. Second Installment General and Special Taxes for the fiscal year 1988- 1989, $2,555.98, plus penalty of $255.59, plus costs of $10.00, Code Area 018074, Assessors Parcel No. 620-190-011-0, Exemption $none. H. Second Installment General and Special Taxes for the fiscal year 1988- 1989, $10,048.85, plus penalty of $1,004.88, plus costs of $10.00, Code Area 018074, Assessors Parcel No. 620-190-017-6, Exemption $none. I. Second Installment General and Special Taxes for the fiscal year 1988- 1989, $4,425.97, plus penalty of $442.59, plus costs of $10.00, Code Area 018074, Assessors Parcel No. 620-190-013-2, Exemption $none. J. Second Installment General and Special Taxes for the fiscal year 1988- 1989, $4,425.97, plus penalty of $442.59, plus costs of $10.00, Code Area 018074, Assessors Parcel No. 620-190-014-3, Exemption $none. K. Any additional amounts of general and special taxes which may be assessed by reason of: (a) Reappraisal of the property values as of March 1, 1975; (b) Improvements added subsequent to March 1, 1975; (c) Qmnge of ownership subsequent to March 1, 1975; (d) Any final judgment determining Article 13A as added to the Constitution of the State of California, being invalid, unconstitutional, or having been improperly applied. L. The lien of supplemental taxes, if any, assess pursuant to the provisions of Section 75, et seq. of the Revenue and Taxation Code of the State of California. M. Prior to the recordation of the map of 24530, all current and delinquent taxes, bonds and assessments, if any, must be paid. N. If the Map of 24530, records between March 1, 1989 and November 1, 1989, it will be necessary to post a Tax Bond with the County of Riverside, Cash or Surety, prior to recording. Please contact this office prior to submitting said bond. 1. Rights of the public in and to any portion of said land lying within any lawfully established streets, roads or highways. Continued Continued: Order No. R-70789-4 2. Reservations recited in the Patent from the United States, as follows: "Subject to any vested and accrued water rights for mining, agricultural, manufacturing or other purposes, and rights to ditches and reservoirs used in connection with such water rights as may be recognized and acknowledged by the local customs, laws and decisions of counts, and a right of way for ditches or canals constructed by authority of the United States" recorded Dec. 26, 1916, in Book 7, Page 210 of Patents. The signatures of The Governing Body of the United States of America may be omitted from the recorded Map if its/their name(s) and the nature of its/their respective interest is endorsed on said map under Section 66436 (c) of the Government Code. 3. An easement for road purposes and incidental purposes, as granted to Norris Andrews in the deed recorded March 17, 1948 in Book 896, Page 322, of Official Records, along the North Twenty (20) feet of Government Lots 1 and 2 of the Northeast quarter of Section 4, Township 5 South, Range 6 East, San Bernardino Base and Meridian. Affects: Parcels 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 9 and other property. Note: Pursuant to the provisions of the Government Code Section 66436 (c) (2) , the signature(s) of said easement holder(s) may be omitted, since said easement appears to no longer be of practical use or value and such signature(s) are impossible or impractical to obtain. 4. An easement for pipelines for the purpose of transporting irrigation waters and incidental purposes, as granted to John J. Kovacevich, by Deed recorded May 21, 1952 in Book 1370, Page 464 of Official Records along a center line of unlocatable width from a point 28 feet South of the Northeast corner of Section 4, Township 5 South, Range 6 East, San Bernardino Base and Meridian; thence Westerly and parallel to the north line of said Section, to the West boundary of the Northeast quarter of said section. Affects: Parcels 8 and 9 Note: Pursuant to the provisions of the Government Code Section 66436 (c) (2) , the signature(s) of said easement holder(s) may be omitted, since said easement appears to no longer be of practical use or value and such signature(s) are impossible or impractical to obtain. 5. An easement for public road and highway and incidental purposes, as granted to The City of Palm Desert in the deed recorded Nov. 1, 1985 as Instrument No. 247401, of Official Records, along the Northerly 55.00 feet. Affects: Parcels 8 and 9 The signatures of The City of Palm Desert may be omitted from the recorded Map if its/their name(s) and the nature of its/their respective interest is endorsed on said map under Section 66436 (c) of the Government Code. Continued Continued: Order No. R-70789-4 6. An easement for public road and highway and incidental purposes, as granted to the City of Palm Desert in the deed recorded Nov. 1, 1985 as Instrument No. 247042 and recorded Nov. 22, 1985 as Instrument No. 264029 and Recorded Dec. 6, 1985 as Instrument No. 275659, all of Official Records, along the Easterly it feet. Affects: Parcel 7 The signatures of The City of Palm Desert may be amitted from the recorded Map if its/their name(s) and the nature of its/their respective interest is endorsed on said map under Section 66436 (c) of the Government Code. 7. An unrecorded option to purchase said land upon the terms, covenants and provisions therein provided, a memorandum thereof being recorded March 17, 1989, as Instrument No. 083079, of official -Records. Dated: Feb. 22, 1989. Optionor: Richard B. Taylor, Thomas H. Taylor and Richard B. Taylor, Trustee of the Richard B. Taylor California Trust. Optionee: Richard J. Rrotz. 8. Any invalidity or defect in the title of the vestees in the event that the trust referred to in the vesting portion of Schedule A is invalid or fails to grant sufficient powers to the trustee(s) or in the even there is a lack of compliance with the terms and provisions of the trust instrument. 9. We shall require that declaration of trust referred to in the vesting herein be submitted for our examination. 10. Note: No known matters otherwise appropriate to be shown have been deleted from this report, which is not a policy of title insurance but a report to facilitate the issuance of a policy of title insurance. For purposes of policy issuance, NO items may be eliminated on the basis of an indemnity agreement or other agreement satisfactory to the company as insurer. 11. The effect of documents, proceedings, liens, decrees or other matters which do not specifically described said land, but which, if any do exist, may effect the title or impose liens or encumbrances thereon. The name search necessary to ascertain the existence of such matters has not been completed and will require a statement of information from the Seller in order to complete this report. I, ML:bd Policy Rate: Enclosures: Plats SI( UM(S) REWIRED Fret TITIE SHEL As of the date hereof, the party(ies) whose signature(s) will be necessary, under the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act, on the Certificates consenting to the recordation of the Final Map or Parcel Map of said land and offering for dedication any streets, roads, avenues and other easements offered for dedication by such map are: Thomas H. Taylor, Richard B. Taylor and Richard B. Taylor, Trustee under the Richard B. Taylor California Trust, as Owners of said land. T- 4MI.ttMK'�I AFpf 653 r[Ip-Ol�l I.%ICAV7' w vv�cR>mn PALM[ESERr,cWl,-i1 OFRMERsn9E,BrnrE ur t<lIF'.iAla FRANK $I�LRTRII- ,�9IdE TENTATIVE TRAt, .� MAP NO, 24'r "0 .._ c.-- �. _��_.._��� Km•n PmmvmVn Dln aAna nYn Ofwnlwe YW wA'Iyfgw0.MwDV atd111f.1nM[OawT. -� � t I )an eA~�R��..Y rr`'� "� Inxwr[[P4wuwvrl9mre�tsauro .•,I �;, :I t' i•_ 4r,. GVrILO 9WOIG IS144RJ bYIDOq - m QQ/j afrM Jmare BlRECrS T _ ( .t)MIfYERLQgYEEOPER 1 [ERpyp � YPoPI♦MtncM YOV/ I V _ (�{r`\ 'f Ry ro nnxnnv a.elart '8 (�,u'`I a vl:mw n gte.nuro �d �` .• � ' I �, � f�0.•I 2t RCr IAT 9fl0�n111 AVA ! IA .Fief 77 _.N. \ •Tz �" 11 QR-aF-SC SrAf[!S --- E 10.IFS,- flJ011fr2Ro {e/taTF 4 -'r _ ^ TI9'At!/ [ccrvrmn F lnC.]oB CHAg E411AWRR AM SSIX;AM US.i. Il; ( (bfdl \,1 4 (A III �jy4 �6)al MRfmnY.n[rnlMlf. ItO.•10 1 - IY�23 -e I\ —M' a[ld''JJ1ly 1 Ill:.!] Imfll.•-rnilf" TC�Iirt1lN-oA) �nra. _� � s ant �.. ,x; t nxut rnr ' .°l`•[w.rw,9A1•Haft uwe°o y� r a.epf�t AmLM ONrf9 it. Y � � ((I e~ �" MA P®��O i' YMt v OOW p5t3P_IiR311Rt1� nnaamr cramsn+w Hen cralsnPaune 4sc_ _ l uMta lm wzml,ra —.__ e,T , I � ll'' "" rrrrrr• _nr..w. L20'/sV-Gl5 V NT a.v`vo ' �. I+r L,. CtC[Tn q 4dfOm rzlrnYlY [r I.a. P [� ft[Y[fs Tllsnl tP42 � y. F � 4r to p _ —_-- _ w:•r woos+wlm fmmA wfmty �'Y' �r � d �� •t �� � ry of ��___ �_— —____—_—_ COOK °iTMT ENTRY prlxlrA�Agp �... t � �t � �" � t� / A � � .OPN I n m,k li�•n Nrv�Q2C'/9COTylva riNr V'a I �f �'.• �' _nS$E@Brut ONtcEI NUMBER (ry1� �� y�M•1 ® .y .e ® —t Y • •Wr.aan.Wl.dtP9.mn O alr it ' !aD� , .�.� .� _ a� ri�w l.il � • .® _ e� ..• P9 •� �u rlwend �1't� "ttFVA]� _ • ' l`C�9f q� _ �s F7 ..' `� ro� u. ®_ r y „ tQ] O. i .2= a�� ,>l, +. .� L'9 n'n •xv fL .'. vy .^' j, �+ ...nx .!J/ 9 9 4ry .'..a--`�`—irnJ• OIe�® r �. ' ®• nre.W ®® 1f,� �c _!A 9 ,{ y ., / 'R1 0�.�• ® '!_l� ���tL.�.=_¢�Z J .. •iIC .-. Al �"a-Mot - m�9tNn R.�JI Inrnrar 6e0_100_03V mWCANr 4-/W 620-2CU-046 :RVACANT •�'`YNi�' m�i oRf"nY d� THIS MAP /S FOR T, R.A. 0I8-064 ASSESSMENT PURPOSES ONLY POR. SEC. J.. T..5S.1 R. 6 E. �7 p O/B- 095 - O a!- 1e3, 07 PAL M DESERTPA/ooso . - L/M/TS rR 22690-/ c R O 2 w - N J O O �u' x63.9e " 4 J133 P T N ~2 o d a __ ` S°<"eg ' .q� T?4 0" 'pt�1.0 Z 3O n 10�'� !AY JAB ,r n wn fe s 2 y O v co to C b o b d ' Q <c.r�6/c- - � - v gh O M O its' m a" y u . DA rf OLD NO N£I NO. - 3. 6&d" relo �� n �^ �B/B3 3 O,./8 114- /3 7/, Sr 0 x t8.s> 3:e4 PO ?6 T K 417.og p�� Sid q !>L.y� it s3'i1 Foy 27 P6./l NOP 3> 343 P O > PG / ` P I z1ae -9 28,29 > m N 21, 29 30 m ^ r ° e �n �e •• 30 PG.. 26 °V' 0° r 3/88 N 3/t» /9 le 3/88 16,26,29 37 t` Y{Q cz a765 N t<z.� An`r I Jz JJ se I� 277.5 R/ O O O./ _ TRI six $� Lot B If, n o/B-aps - i O N PM. 100190-92 Parcel Mop /840/ v m sf B /32/85,9/ Trad No. /5000 ASSESSOR'S MAP SK 626 PG 02 RIVERSIDE CO['•'TY, CALIF. ✓ULY ,_22 2 619.68 PM SWA/4{SEC/Or T5SSrR.6E TRA. OiB-oae 6.32 — Q¢ Sheri i cf 2 - O, i o jo ,rj�vlv m / 2 O,• 1 J J cl low, O -• ice- LO < '\ ® ''® t J �ltl _ 1 ' • 1 t �' O 7 ;v©' � I 1 a • O 1 i �j �� 1 \ b 4 I 1 I NA AC4/ 04W CAMELLO • .� .O I T � t t Arnr: gars/ nwiu A76 Ae .w m%Drk D Itlttzs�ss->'1 Al.8 IW168-72 FMIAb /3407-/ 43 AW Aw65Z AGLW iit+D -a^7Y, C&F _ ,•• AUG /98Z J r / � I � I _ V T 49B'�!• V /%AS' f >s.cO' __ >s c0' _- )S m' IIIII L LOT .�'7990fJF y r c \ 0,44Z sr 8 z. e 39 40 h y8o- 35 J7 3B Sr /0.6855.F /2.722 SF 27 til f/ l363' l77L' ` /0.600 5.F $ 34 35 ]99 SR 10,8f6 J..F, 6f /0.9f9 5 r n I I I /Z,875 5r 1 p p0 /0.f66 5,F \\ 2B \ k h 8 I I I I ��W..f9' — --L3l0'---��—_----- I ZZ T 4 I{1 --7>35'—. I /0.8/25.F 10.550 Sf /O.395`. I WI I 32 l a (pp/VPTEyQy� //3J05F f ��7s 3!`1y 00 Z w �.� \ d N asm' 1 RIVE 7Z' COV/NGTON oai 46 •� I o I I y� "�<n —a--'---'------ -a—'� _!/ate-� •` .,� /of6o 5F m I /o.o7e s.F m I LOT%C" Of24, 45 I I f I la 25 43 a66 u 47 h 2 /O.f895F 24 23 22� I 1 41 "12 /<f51S.F E 10,9685E $ I $ 10.0785E 8 � � /O.f693E /00f53< I /0,f905F i I I q�j O.ff/ JF 4 /0'f775£ i b r� P] !• I /2572' I pj H vsss .95ei I -. . I yor' 4C�I $ e I y8 'b�• a/°e BSQ> I Ne6' mq5 $ 4B 10.070,5E 55 17 \\\\�\\ o. o�s 5>2F� � � /0�.9/vAj3.F72.•— ___en 7Z'- -m m•_---e-5.o—a' . /II II II � /2.59GSL ah /e5so• /2ti5 50'III I II,I � /O.07 8 SF12 972' ~k I I 51 50 19 ��O � V 1 454 52 //,579 SF I 10,9503F /O,20J! 5Z SF /0.5 /S.F / z F — 0.0 9 4 ,O0`nF ' IIII hhhW i (i IyATE 6reez —.— --- TAYLOR ^ AVENL/E TAYLOR AVE. I c •^ (vR/VATE sraEETJ �� / I R _a'm'---ea°0=---e°m----mm=---mm•--=mm'-- --mm'---- --mm'-- ---------- / I 19.3053.E n q h n RETENT/ON SAS/N o I V 15 WELL 5/TE 5 a I 19.1995E 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 B 7 5 2s 25o //,395 SF //,OB/ 5f /0.22f SF 10.00055 10,000 S.F /0,0003.! /0,000 S.F /0.0005F /O.0m 3.f. IS.6975.E I I L2: �3.fo• e�si• ems./5' d5 c5' BOm' mm' mm' -- 41 J THIS _MAP /S FOR _ - .. 6/9- 06 _ R?R5112 SEC.%O T5S R.6E S`32 L `3 ;ASSESSMENT PURPoSES ONLY - - - T.R.A O/8- 060. 1 > 015-O/2 02 - T672347-R /44z.7S nb.7z P/[�I.7 F I40I � - 1e Pcr. Par.2 u W l9 rs LOT / .Oe t'�a �`e4's Ax4 G34 - - 34.06Ac 30.59AcM: n O d.wuopi R 4000Aef y ~ S I b iri T �! i ZQ•IN 624 n..� Seq.s• e.I] i si I I C'J`04 nn I-•14n I V76 1 ti I 9(O( .8(• aa� ss•� 02 ,y i v 1 /894Acf b om Pori u - 3 0 w �I n O3/9AaW o pm - os6 s O i o /2 AXI w ; yar Ac %I 6Y-ep - TE O Aa. ATwm �� 444tYf 94Z.07 9 - • i PY.64/66 6e 747.I2 /Oi_>..� a BY./A'-7 .- OC 3 2 e /1 /J ..�...�.��._�... .e. . . ...�. _ _ - I44L S.I // /6 /5 ' 60F 7r 6184 7 1415 �Ex +e9.4.'ose /5�/4 15 rose 052Ac Nt - - 634 . 7/e3 9,- I6.sz PM 64/66-68 A rce/Nfp /3406 2-06 . /O3 I7.Ie PM/O//7-B AyceI l P 1795/ 2.e6 re PGJI I0/e7 14 19.20 M.B./73159-60 Tract No;22547 R m Pa." ASSESSOR'S MAP BK 632 PG 03 RIVERS/DE COUNTY, CALIF 619- 84 - - � V � 05TNJS MAP IS FOR IRA 0I8-060 PORSW. 114SEC./O, T5S,R 6�ASSESSAIENT P po= ovix O!B-/3 , • - CQ+7 c� se ¢.r t �V �� �4. •sue / / �, / s , 17S7 / CO> �'300 o, a ` s'' -roO ti ,ip top p /,p i $3S t47N a rt on /fz to Q Ocsh 2 Q f 6'fir N � . O $ 2 to�04 �,o �,100.(io c'��1a �tb•�e - 619 - 83 ,�,�.g .� 6%32 - O 6 2�b V VOW c. y` 0 � I-, O ( b ZQo a`b as �Y 0 ` vY O w\ 5o ioo ,oS ize 0 '� 147. 3 0 � e In h N I ~ O 33 ® 18 . V 83 Y, 0 O o y op Q I n b ^ 1p 0 �( +. a' e} Q I 0% ' Q 146 ) J O o? Z04 r- 200,o+ N N ^ O 0 O 0 \ u J 1 11 n I R tr 3j ;3 t4o.7 A 4 1 f Q-:S O 4 Qr. O N� 11 rn T L=4ASA. ►! ,d0.7t 235--79 .21 t19.87 T ti 0 TNA 0/9-060 / IIA � h Q O Yi'RLl1 j r, A • O A-/00 Z 3S_DZ L= I77/ �� -•) 358.50 Rnt7 0 214.73 9t:2 33.f L: S0 175.t4Lx O c:Z&.7 41 44 r N W S Q Q S ip a t0 0 a \ r \ to N Q b TR/39/3 y 4t 41 240. 4.0 5- t41-Z 3 25$ 04TE OLD ft JAEWAV. 14 h y 6185 /5 050-P3 N0-04,543,E 04� r 9185 /8,/9 30 STREE T� //Cs 2,1/,11 it h h i4TA /J749y 2 /�IJ'12 5 - 4 _,_ PSSESSOR'S MAP Bid -,PG 06 ,:SEE JDAE E ESMr - !If LIC O ",:SEE' 'FIDIKACL Y i t R/VERSIDE couvrY, CALIF A✓w eF:uf FOR v.c. e HP b -- - -- - — -- --- — - - F . } _ <- , I .1._ 1� . 1� .o I .I . - " I - i ., I � . I � I � .I - .. •+ < �t: .. 1 653- 40 I ­�,v-, 2 - 1, I I I � . . 1. � I �� -_ I .., 1� I I, . . , , . �I' T Cy'A. D8 073 . Y ., - l ,. ..:, 3 x a - .�, ` el SEC, 3 -T 6 S w is f rnce .- _ __.• :r . - . shed mis s ,. i F: r .. -,..,r .,, .. as a conve r.I . U -- , , .: ., _ ,., : i locating• , re • _ ahe:Isnd ind�,r. , .> . . Can C _,:. 9_. ted hereon survey._ .: yo .. r, ,.t refers " y i. ::. -, r .' __ __ .� rest and_ . _ . _, n .'With { aia lit '•..rF -.,. -.n... .�- , ,.,,.,... _:. � _ _ by reason Y �,:._.,� an�Y ardice h - . . , a .. _ ,: -. - : , 1.1. 391. °� of reli ereon �• _ - - f. «.: a ,. a� .. ..:.. , -.: - ,. ♦M1, > {-_ < ! -: 1. ter. -,- o _ .,. t... _ .. . - k :'! i r - , .. ': _ _ .. - _ ., - - 5 11 �is s7 r, f f I *} 'y, , r , `' s•: SWEET. OR.�e /'f' ss41t•Ic 1 , - s, . : r , t -. _ _ ,, 1. rN I FPA:1 i: / -r-:::�� . I - , _ . - _ - _ r1l 1� _ 1. - - , .. _ , m .. ..: _ T . ., -1. .Y e .. ., _ -+i • / r 2 . _ c f ,. , __ 4.�. _ _ -I , w , +_ 4. . . L .. _, r _ V :x .a_.:. .:. .. , . { ,., ice.. , . . 1. . . ,.. 1. Y<',. ,.c, : r �. .,. -,r , - . -:. - .. .-.. , S r. . r rN _ W �_ 1._ , , . _ : r u <. �. 9 .82 .._ \ f Ac «,,, ..s P / rt. ti�'I t: .: :e-) O 3_ r r x_ " ` v I. - , - i . . _ .. F< o- _ ti r ti' .., , ..' . O , y . 1. ,. . -y_ � ,.. , .. v: < _ :. .:. -. • ..: .... y.. a :.Y ..r. «. F:" . 1_ - try`. ,.. , . .,._, _ , ., . i w _ .., .ter �.. -_. „ : : AP4.T24cN1. "r _ : . . . s -,. . z .�, .ice :., .,, x -..- .r "Y.21Z..�r ,- s > : - _ 1. - 3. ,,' .,f . _..__. ' Q _:. a k .t _', .' .-. W ;` g.,, rw. N , r,. . { •. 1.- � _ H 4..• ,: ... t h - Y % t�I _ R f .. .: . • . . 8 - R, , `�- .ED . . •�' r t : 59 33.f Ac . , , It , 1 ' v . . 4 4' : _ �' • •'+_ _ - >• a A' � .. _ _ . T20 . ,", s 3 `(./,/1 a h -. 11 Ia ` ,.. . i :„ - r r - 3 1 „ °K QI. , v• 52.30E Ac x :. - 1\ ` . . . M n: .' ::O > y t x , - ,. A - .- - .. -- ,~ r , _ . - <_' J s - . . -_: LL a iil . ; f' • . ? ., r - - ,L L. : •- „ • . - , Y :*F d - 4 •� y _.... - _ _: t _ - - ..a., .. } h yy � a _. ( t 7SC R -- i4l ;�Tr 0 M 4&5LOT A f* 35C68 6 6/ to s •tt q Tit J * 7 q 5 ` -d�' .5/IYr7 w r^ •.#%#-A 1 , � r, ,4r, /of 400' 7iF.7s ;�,1 '<e. I /",?./Z ., 3 I �s• r, 1. I8 a II " _ _ 1. � _� O � Z461 c� ,` -4, • N0. 2 NO. 2 t = 9.72Ac•k 9.72Ac f �. _ '�. - I t (4 e�7 J 59.36fAc, 1 _ (40. 66 (46 . 52) 1 ( 40- `, � �j ' - _ L L .39 J . 1. w �7 - __ 55 c 56 A 6 . (� .:' 1 ,: , I -... _ OIT ' OLD NO. MEW NO. hr , ,> /ZAM 03 ' Q 3T- 0 I M �' , // ST 1 ti I B!1• Of /1 ST .. y s , / // s, Sr ® (�-o Z //es / /s.rosr i . 2,32fAc 1, _ 2 20 2/ , �q I . . �Q } Q Q o A / /000 c /O,OOAct S.00Ac} yy .. 5,OOAc} 9-/74ci . h % • o NO. I (80J NO. I ti IB ) 3 t � I ' 75.15fAc � - .y• II I7 Q '4: Q J 20.00Acf /9./7Act I- . , a t so • /!i o i I j I , 26 . , I O2 t /O.00 A t. I /= 400' I e ( 39 Q L�1 L 1 4 425ACi 5.00Ac 5.00Ac. a0OAc. 5OOAc. 5.00At. S.00Ac. 5.00Ac. 19.62Aea* I (' • 6 1 ' I1 + 4.59Agf ( . W ,• � I 9 I , " 1` 0 , % 4.59Aet I . 03mo ZO.00At. ! b/L I v 4 Q8 �9 1�10 I •4.25�1c. 3.AOAa S.00Ae. S.DOAt S.00Ae 3.00Ac SDOAe. 3.ODAc. ( 626 /9.62 Aef ( /� �B O k / X. I 330 N&9`43 33'E • _ % ^ I ' OATE OLD NOJ NEW NO. O O I \O /I ? 37 42,ST Q I Q 5 O 4 //86 7 43 s r . I5 I6 I7 IB /9 / k ( © 0 3/e 44 ►. 5.36Ac. I 4,6,- 6 40 45, ST. I 425Acl 5.00At. 5.00Ac. 5.00Ac 5.00Ac. 5.00Ac. 5,OOAe. 5.00Ac. O I 3 6 46-4 `l 33.73 Ac Fly..k 42 2/117 22 5/y ST ! v4" 9/88 -M I52,5-1 I 36.99Ac 1 . I I Q) �' l I � w,I 51 Q @ @ Q ® I I i 395Aef 2.33Ac. ZMAe. 4.67Ae. 4.67Ae. 4.67Ac. 4.59-~AC. 4.6744 4.STAt. 3r I �;,,,481 I �8 ---,-Jj �_ -- - - - - , COUNTRY CLUB DR. 624 62 DA TA GLO PLAT O2 3O 3I R/S 34138 R,S 72/82 PA/W 86-f . A ASSESSORS MAP 8K, 620 PG,20 k . RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIF SEPT. 1967 �, - k I r n ':.ta lmrif. AMENDMENT SCALE: � DATE N •"•_ •� : : • ,/'. ,. •'y ;� =,r . ;- .� ;L/•• IN THE CITY OF P DESERT, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE , STATE OF CALIFORNIA DESCRIPTION - Y /, CAC -? z „ FRANK SINATRA DRIVETEN -_ _ STA. 79 f 4l0. 43 C�---/2 5 _. _ - __- _� -p f IVE "' APT - ��� - -- - - - MA NO . 0 N BEING A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 6 EAST, /169 49 27 E' / .6 w -� _ _� SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN - L4AO5C4P AREA LOT ,c '� � COW BLOCK W4L "5 ,. --Y--d' --- j �T�� ROBERT BEIN' WILLIAM FROST 6 ASSOCIATES /Olo 75 70 gTREET �- 32s' ",8 r�zc CHARLES HAVER b� ASSOCIATES DIVISION C77 l S.!) ; V I ' w 0 /03 - /OZ . /O/ �` /OB l A P R I L 19 8 9 � ,, � SCALE : I = 100 O 50 100 200 350 500 � 2s 0 /l,3/O v 98' /04' 77 �� es /Q9 I I tia r/5, h! V 5'r'U.E. I 4 �� 5'P.u.E. ` ; 0 7 �► /o,cLro� 4 1 _ STREET y //0 I _ 0 /O'0 /d, - Flo, I I Q , 7p Y Ole, -� • - .. Y /// ( . o b o p pa �> . o-77 PAD a 6 04RON „u 0 �� • , -�- ,-.: STREET " ENTRY I .r5. /2 5 O O f �/ a 93 92 0 /o' Q TELEPHONE CAQL E TE/E!//50A/ 2' F/� � ��� 77.8 7 ° //2 4 ELECTR/C/TY ��--!WATER � GA5IF rJ ' s/JN1r.9('' sEi�/E2 ---{ • " /390� 10,7900 73 t� .•a 3 ooczo� /o,a�c /oc t: MAIN PRIVATE STiF'EETS ' _ . • . ® { j.,;• o -- —— I F !AD ELEVAT/ON } • z- -es' !/3 `' 7• NO SCALE 85 o 7 3g Ili ' T YP/CAL SC OPE /01/d5� ro. �,: /o 4a� 4 ( I y— N. T.$ 6 ', , OWNER / DEVELOPER : w �prh 7-4 ss 82' 80' Bo' �i 7 (� 5'P.U.E. -3 ' ( 5'P.U.E. ~ �— L=400' LEGEND BARON'S FINANCIAL GROUP 3 1 RICHARD J. KROTZ b_• P40 EL_/O/.O 69- 730 HWY. III SUITE 212 2 �\ 20% 2.0% FFEL. /O/.50' (oZ/ I PAD ELEVATION • o 82 B/ F N ---- iv U R 0 RANCHO MIRAGE CA 9227 • • ' i to BO 78 /oar I' {26s�- EXISTING CONTO ,. • N O o SQUARE FEET (619) 328 - 9111 a-- GRATED DRYWELL INLET O ;-•, TELEPHONE �t• � TECEv/5/ON � 4 , 5l0`� /O,/BF.� / 3 /O,4�¢ /O,4Cb� /,'/ 7�.`O t '!'' •, . f----� CATCH BASIN 75, 95 , /2 �1 ELECTiP/C/TY ��--WATER GA5 I a do` Bo' so' 65' a I /O,GL'27//'1 r,., . 5ANIT4A"' — ENGINEER : — EARTHWORK QUANTITIES (C.Y.� •:, 73¢ 7�Z Q CUL-oE-SAC STREETS ti j ROBERT BEIN, WILLIAM FROST AND ASSOCIATES � PR/VATS EXCAVATION - 292 , 255 CHARLES HAVER AND ASSOCIATES } /��5�_ �. '�•� /o� � ,:.,. � � =f; :- � -- - DIVISION //B U ', NO SCALE �.G s-0 � � OVEREXCAVATION _ 120,610 74-390 HWY. I11 315 PALM DESERT CA . 92260 70 7/9 ° I I SUBSIDANCE (.25 ) - 36, , -`-�°O s =o �¢ /o SHRINKAGE (•15 %) -56 ,485 �. (619) 346 - 7481 FAX (619) 346 -8315 TOTAL CUT = 320, 065 , 7/ 70 !09 l07 !o!o Cry PMAL - � 73.4t 73•/ � 72.7 � I io,� � � . cFi I FILL _ 174 , 240 ��' 0 OVEREXCAVATION BACKFILL - 120, 610 7YP/CQ L LOT /O r85 /03� /o a C.fro Room GR2.40E Poo EG • T.C. /.o' opd� 'O "'"2� I TOTAL FILL /2 xc. 5 , No SCALE = 294,850 �' EXISTING ZONING : 75 05, �, �, � � � F.S.=T.C. I t0.5 \ B5' 55' BD //S ��� 0 7/.G i = o NOTE- PAD EGEI/. SET /,O:�1.QOVE EXCESS 25,215 _ P. R. 5/ P. R. 10 to/ !02 G3 log 65 /� p ii�� TOPov',rae.B AT Lewv oz I 7/ �� v } CdR6&GUT TE.e ,a /3�2ogr /r,4o2� , 9 .•`% ; 1' '��. i' PROPOSED LAND USE : oTt ?Q TYP/CAL LOT CROSS 5'E'CT/Oti/ SINGLE LOT RESIDENTIAL am 7o B9 '�R>� S A/O .-CAA_E ,..i ;Y , i• •` f , COA/C ,BLOCK WALL - 5 ,e r r� • • , •r r38' 92' 60" rr r2s 5/G � '2 h UTILITIES / / /37 /,�8 /39 /AD /4�/ /4t2 /43 /44 /45 /4tlo /47 /�8 / � 70.9 O.lo , 4 7 . /34 /o, �a 70• tic;v / 9 7.G� ti SEWER C•V.W.D. _. as >y . } z4' z4' WATER C.V.W. D. 0 2mr/i ro, ro,&674f I :' /D o o /o, /4 c � ri 820�6 /58ioq�i o' J es' p /27�� 7O9 50 9 Bo /ocxx�� /oc>�� /OGY err roo�� /aQ��f �oci� /oa-� /o,��. /0,000 1 ' /2 GAS SO. CAL. GAS CO. L= 29Z, 67R66T �709 "C'r_ =5z3' _ /50 ELECTRIC S0. CA. EDISON l05.00 ��•'!rL ��.-5 q /�� G�� 9 = .O �t0 - _' 5=0.0040 - .. , _ S=O.0040 ---� _ „s. � � N i /oo' /o &,' r go Q'o �o' TELEPHONE G.T.E. ro,3� O � 0 0 48 249 3 25¢ 274 2 .� 27 O ;� s�o / TELEVISION 2.55 2 27/ 2T PALMER CABLE 95 r0,� /4 7� 70/ ' 704 'Q I cm. h ' ti v /25 25 4ZD /I I II 9DO /25' /25 70.6 - L=29o' I /25 I /o 17 v /r r' /o,coo 0 /o,Gb0 /o, /O, 7/ STA 3o t 6p 99G2 STq• 3z�39Gz SCHOOL V /O 3 O Og:-"--'� /3� - v O 2 7 0 V O 253 �C: 2.5 2 7 2109 /0 19 0 , STq. 27,G3. z8'`5/�2 - 70, ''r (057 3 _ — , , 7� �� ,_�D7 20 oow r /�450 /o,/ o¢r r2s' ,2s Z78 Zug I` i52 Q -- — DESERT SANDS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT /2Co /3/ j. /o !� ` o -o- /0,370 /o,060 � ti � lo.'S.� _ $ �W � STA. 2G<53.G2 - ��; STA. 3/f G9.G2 •. O ri��45 , `� (097 <09¢ W 15 5/ 252 4e- 7 /o,cm w. //4 coR. — — — — .� r-;� � ¢� N r,�rr /qa�� /o,��vi , ti /o /o � � a �09.�► 7 � 73 �� \\ -/Z,S/9� 70 /5 - - - - -- - - CY�p GL'?D ro - -- .••,� U / 440 /OG� O o0o a, /4d c 1 1 v 3 ! • C m /4coo J 9 Ni /5,040 /8,� O /fl s o_ __ o Ci • 78 z� 2O 20 9 27 i3o to . 2g5 258 �� 77 7 a ® SUMMARY �B4- ' 7io �9/ �� �; 40:0�-' N _.. oCOOK STREET ENTRY 264 7 /Z ro5./ ) � ..25' 2 -13 39 s: !o .0 S S, - `, /54 N. r5. - GROSS SITE AREA = r2s /�� 91.15 AC. 7/• �0 /v, 243 �s- /G,/�o lay a� 2�8 y„0' _ZSD /25 ./ 250 25'9 Rom. = 89.48 AC. �' NET SITE AREA t2/D 244 6�0 ¢/ s. G��� Gfo.2 2Co6 /o qy MIN. -O � � LOT SIZE - 0,000 S.F. 47 a * ` .4 lu8lo to <o . 2 7 6 7, I -. '`;' TOTAL NUMBER OF LOTS = 280 RESIDENTIAL = 277 • o oP Zs /0.3�0 ¢� ¢r /o, J2 40 ,si 3S5 5 /S _ • . _ � ':f :' - %t•'• : • f°� : • � . �j ` 111 Y' \ .. /0,500 N S /FEET s' zo z,39 2l0/ %�_� •`,:'�:. s..•'i':. .:, c 1 . ELLNSIOTE _ . . r ° • o a 3/ �� ANDSCAPE = 0- - ... s 2 5, O. 7 CONC. 8L CK WALL �, 0%9 o I _ Ili � � e °, � ► ( ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER /o� 2/g 220 o - �r 2&3 210� 261 _ //8� _ *40 ' _,5 �•, ao' a9' Q ¢3' 620- 190-006, 007, 008 , 009, 011, 013, 014 & 017 .02,37 , 4.J I 202 3G"R.C.P. 5'14F9 C� �07/ 2�Z >�.95 i O.//O l7 �pJ V v �'0/� ro ,..• / . .: io cn > _ 'o ,Z74 c,� �O� 59,9 /off 4Zo s, s- S 3sr� , ,cam �v 5'oi /l00 /!o/ %l02 o h N � _ v„ �, p /0,060 ' /o �'" qa s0 /O o �f0,9 ;� M �� N N ¢ , ! /l04 /l05 jl ;. 7O6 i.3,cog3 5' 0 5900 75- „r20�6 223 asz 2,3�0 ems, /ao' go' v �� �`" O 15' S ero' v 9 0 7$, � �02�0 O. - I �••f s PARK If &&_NT/01V 9 �' �cto 9 �'�� S- + �'2 /3,970 � /_/ .,••.� 7. c°S$ �.//Ac.R. 5tora E /92 / �a 22 S � /035 5 234 233 2.32 0 /zs /2,9 /G�25r ;7: 44 �a� 9 6 .� '� , o� h � o .� sy / �0�9 `9 '2 5//j d_$,� } 3' h /oJO � �� �8 0 ti` � / /4,OG0� } 75, 59.G9 L= 'h 58 :. 14 .62 /90 TA 3 �o �o' 2/g o /o,��o r/; - 5�0.004a-�- w �frA31*67(p %IrRY /0,3� (03 >p /a,,0 00 5 ,Q � � S .05 - p5 � o � / ., C-649 r. T 5 I EY/5r WAra ¢8 �� % / %z `2 2 SEE/ _ - - 6z.ao R;Zgo, �L 7 p° 3�► CONNE TO ,A , cr �o°J.8 - t 2 / G/ S .9S • - /70 125 V >. 227 75 m �1 f 2/7 /✓�3 -- 23 ��� �"s �W /o,000 Q '; , 70 ems- 490 I 6S M� `b �o �2 /8Co /0,900 o /r , , 3 ' sue W 95' \ �'i �' � � /85 9s; /O,rip room¢ /o,_�, _ /o,475r/i /q ,, eo /73 /O,��o ¢ �` Q PRQJECT SITE N % !k� �,, leo p f84 75' es eo' ao /75 �j �' � FRANK 5/N.4 TRL] �i, h� /,g5 �- ��` /B3 W o /7�0 10,0004 Op, D.P/VE %6, 7Bo l,�/ G /o, o� <<b S .4 �� h � 1 W - ,S � o� �o, o �3� /82 /8/ /80 o /79 /?8 /77, h �S ° z /37 0 . . �' o FS. s6 9s. /13 -- o �s �� /A24a - �3, a� iZ dos " /7-0 4 �I o , r '• ,, 'lid /� YJ ` o'x 1(1i1 yl V ,0 L</ �D� �O/8 ` �� /o,490 ac�oy 0l 3915 5 - '•� � `y R, ioo" y°s, (:Zs 6 � E:, 3 �qf h / �;; 3 STiPEET 8 5109 ` „S V STA. Zf3 +U3 •- i _ _ rro _ 9y F, 69/ 33 �' 8� 6 26 - a �� /� _ 0.40 --�+ ---=:, _ SEWER� � � -�� CONNECT- TD EX/5T �6 .3 7 a F_; \ / \ 0 bta' Bo .� 5 /NV -P5 /3 S �1 0"'RCP ELEI' 0. V I 7 7O� o /0 g70 2�h 32 31 30 9 28 ��\; s a°c '2�cb� /S /� /3 /2 // /� °/ 7 8 wArER Zc N 7 , O ' �°, 63'0 �", �2� !?.3 (G?; �,/ 7l ! (✓O r0 7 �./z I coun/T,er ccua OR/VE ¢l08 l� Bc�j O O ro7 /lo $ G ` C/ �2TOPAB F - '� - 68 /9,/Z6 9f (o$.l ' //,9,35� /OB30 /O /oGYYJ /oar /o oGb� row ram K)OGY� WELD 5/TE 29,257 w l 4 COR ER h j3�7p 3D /O,/6O /O,/60Q4 //, 785 / 4� ,CL'00 � � � � e,2a - ---- pq 4 ; N /75' /75' /5' ,/ > MAN e .- _ �—. - - ` - ... /.. c o�+ _to N8 �-!'/�/�,rrE Z�o07 2D s� (L.4/1/ f5C' Pe er �ErrAirl /�/ `5 E = 49 CFS./r'(O PASS NDE /Q� 95 � n dl* • .. ... � . _ B RM. - -tom- `:�/ :._ ";r': :'- 2,/ rYP. (o CONC. BLOCK WALL ti S DEWlaLA' 2Sa'7 OPEN/NL3 3; .•• .. ...l.. c.. .. • .r ,r .ti ., n /• • ., /, ..,... Q/Do /0!o C•F.6 TO PA66 N Q _ V �<�� N /00 - /Oro C.F.e. W/LL FLOW UICI ITT MAP i'. -i ti..•/ s . -j. .. l:.. .. /:- .. .. • :=::' L THRU r50.Y(o" WALL OPEti/NG� lV I ' OVER THE 5/DE'W,4LK NO SCALE - _u, , AMENDMENTISCALE: , . j . ; ;•,. L:, , _ ��,t . ,- , ;� . , , IN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE , STATE OF CALIFORNIA , _ : . � �• :• DATE N0. E DESCRIPTION /�.rf CORNER z „ FRANK SINATRA DRIVE 5TA. 79 + 4Yo. 43 le-- - --- 5 -- ----- TENTA IVE RAC MAP NO , 24530 � I BEING A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 6 EAST, - - - N69 4 27 E' / .�� --� - SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN " LAND5C4PC AREA ` LOT 'IC " ,- 6' CONC BLOCK W4L. "5 --a' --- -- 4oT ter,, /s�' ROBERT BEIN, WI L L IAM FROST 8 ASSOCIATES �5,0 SwcET _ �1!4 d 07. H��RLES HAVER b� ASSOCIATES DIVISION r 77. / �� �0' 7/00.53 ' �7/0 �2 .� /7O5./ . � /�0 �B2 - r A P R I L, 19 8 9 SCALE • I = 100' /o, � 0 50� 100� 200� 350' 500' �1. .. O /2,240 30 3/0 /0,090 qy 1,,OBO!�! /r�o� i .143 �5 I � ti Q , V 98' r24 77 ' ' 72' `' �� �ti B5 ' h : � /Q9 I 07 /100100,zr 4 I _ T IVY ------------- TO C756; //0 0�' 0 �%� /o/3 / IQ,�, 000 0 �� So ao ' M1�7 � STREET • `' 3 Q • 0.9-'� ,. � .. �� pe i ii . u..n u __..... Q P,90 E��l/ /V \I 11 , oo r ` °� � � ���� % ��%, STREET H ENTRY =� 93 92 , TELEPHONECABLE TELEIr/90N90 ELECTR/C/TY ��—_�,ugTE-R NSAN174e.'/ro790o /000¢5 /o,Cbq� /o ro3(o 4 �- MAiN PRII/,4TE STREETS I o o -- -- /4D ELEVAT/0/U NO SCALE , F , 8� 85 80o 67 �' � �� 7r?3 N 73. 9 73.l0 73.3 73.2 /oc� � •`�_ + °.c�•°� � R/w R,w TYP/CAL SLOPE /o //4 I I I ,� s- `.M.ti._ Al. T.5. P, /o �0 /' OWNER / DEVELOPER ' l �--,� _ah 73.55 82' 80' 80' � 73•2� � 5'P.U.E. .3 70 �- L-moo f LEGEND BARON 'S FINANCIAL GROUP '-- ' RICHA D `s �' 82' �' �. ems- � //5 ' 7R J. KROTZ t� 83 ti� 66 I ,••_ _ % ( FFEL= /O/.50' �7/ 69- 730 HWY. III SUITE 212 •.•.; 729 0 . '• %_ O PAD ELEVATION a ., : N ? 2D �o/ --1 �- EXISTING CONTOUR 80 79 7 aco ^.� o �o t � N 2� RANCHO MIRAGE . CA 92270 i3?3 ti 8 L / /.��° .A !�; I 5 SQUARE FEET (619 32 - ; ,.; ) 8 911 • ' : O v O 1/ !�-. I o TELE!//5/ON� i a Q— GRATED DRYWELL INLET TELEPHD/UE 1* '�•. /� o /o,/ /d,3 row /o, � (72.�01 �--� CATCH BASINI ELECTR/C/TY ��--WATER GA5 I I . eo I �. � sO' B5' �0 .��l :• 5/1/!//TrJ,� c, -i:'�/' I i 72 7.3 , ENGINEER : 4 s 76 77 0 � 117 I EARTHWORK QUANTITIES My..), CUL-DE-SC 5FREETS 1 ROBERT BEIN, WILLIAM FROST AND ASSOCIATES I EXCAVATION = 292 255 rorBS J �/"/P/VATE� i CHARLES HAVER AND ASSOCIATES DIVISION � �: , - --- -- OVEREXCAVATION V i 's• NO SCALE 1� 5=0.41J�(TyP/CAL) T , = 120,61 0 74-390 HWY. III ,o, o i SUBSIDANCE (.25) _ - 36, 315 PALM DESERT, CA . 92260 SHRINKAGE (.15 %) - // - -56 ,485 (619) 346 - 7481 FAX (619) 346 -8315 2� 9� 82' eo' 80, //9 w - — TOTAL CUT = , •`, 320 065 7/ 7O !09 lid �p I 22' /2�'�N PMAL k 7 lolo O N . 73g h 7/.ro m i _ 174 , 240 FILL - .� N O44 O O O .� 2/ rc.fro _ I OVEREXCAVATION BACKFILL 120, 610 Roc/GN GR.4,cE P4D Ez- - - rc. io TYPICAL LOT TOTAL FILL /o,r85tf /O, r/i ,o¢ood/ /off /i/i2� ^ Fsleo .=rc. , Tom. 294,850 EXISTING BONING 75, /2D o NO 5CAL.E �' 2 0 r.c.to.s' � -135 /oo' as' as' eo /is �'� p 7/.2; % EXCESS = P. R. 5/ P, R. 10 m MOTE- PAD EGEV. SET /,D,425DVE 2 5,2 15 TOP OFCeIR,5 AT z-ew � v S �'C[rRe 6el7 7 7/.8 � O �,�' '`* '•�72Os� - � /i osvgy /, os-o/� /4 orb 0 �a g TYPrCAL LOT CROSS' SECT/D�/ ,• PROPOSED LAND USE : NO .SCALE •' SINGLE LOT RESIDENTIAL- L=350' a '� - " G' CONC. ,BLOCK WALL s., .•.., , ;• :'L=-. '' _ 37 'S Coo /39' 92' �' �' w � 7/8 59 58 57 N 5Co -R� - /35 /, 137 /38 /39 /¢p /¢/ /42 /43 /44 /45 /4l0 /¢7 /48 /¢g h o UTILITIES /2¢/� 7/.5 7i2 ti 70.9 70.E /� /34 7O7 70. E N /?Gi/ �98 °I2 �' �9- �7.1a o7.3,> 70 N �' SEWER C,V.W.D. ri /r9�o¢f /oc00� /0,& 7, i 0,8�50 /oo /c1c��rf ir82oQf /5,8ro� �0' 24' 24' WATER C.V.W. D. B5, Ci2 70 0 /o,Cx�o �o�� /ocer roa�/� /o, qt - 95' SO' ® eo go I > - GAS SO. CAL. GAS CO. 0 /zSPs /29Co4� rx� �94/ �= 28to` osz� L= ege, STREET Gro9 „C:/ 1 L=5Z3' �5.00 t50 �,� ti °1 52 53 cyt S5 N /2s' - - - _ - - - - ELECTRIC SO. CA. EDISON 5 = .0.0a4o 5=0.0040 S=0.0040 -- pso m , i �, 300 /oo' /oo /o, ,o 90' 75 (010.0 Q;� �o' TELEPHONE G.T.E. 95'16, �� /0,45/r 48 249 ` ' 25� 255 27¢ 273 272 27I 270 %l;s/o /� t\ >° �, TELEVISION PALMER CABLE �8 /o, /c1�70 70,/ I ro °p O � ti /0,070 t/i1�--� v < G I !07. �u7. - �9 45 /25 u25 11�420 V I //,900 /25' /25' _ (\ ( /51 70.<o _ L=290' I f 2$ �f /o cL'� I 7 o�` //7' /O'000 0 (CI Q'}O} lf3 CU00 r0,Oa�� to/2��1i /O, /OG') 7� Oho � STq 29�7/. 5r4• 30 f /3� V 2 7 -•SO 275 srq. STq e < - s9.G SCHOOL \,, 8O, 76. 2�� /0,t 30 , 27 8 �i 62 6262 STq, 32< 2 Q o �� ?g 9 9.9 �I 70. �o o„ ,�,(� �p • CZ� 160 o �c 3 �3. — 50 - --- - 2O� o //450 /o/ Obi m /z5' /2s ' 278 279 DESERT SANDS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 7p7 ;� -07 20B , ,oa, 2 v �(p ` o /o,370 `��o.� / h /o,GZ'�C �v 0.4:) W 9TA. 26,,53.(2 o �¢ , 7oO (097 1094 W t 15 25/ 252 257 27ro ti Z�8 V /ocm v _ w. /�4 coR. --- — — � ;• (09� W �-9 7/� �07.3 ,go0 (05� o • C ; �/ ^ /Q,GG.CJ 7{U fh /ojCD� x0,000� o ` Ii(.. N70 �� �.® 0777 -- 70 p N B /O,oG0 /D, o N O GYao /5 040 t3i Bo' 2 5 /ate r!/ I /27 /30 'a 2g /8,� SUMMARY ,J� N /z��' �' a 290 N �o� o COOK STREET ENTRY /54 \ NTS'. GROSS SITE AREA = 91.15 AC. 7/.•¢ v► 2¢3 2 ) es. ,/so �y a5 'P� �o J NET SITE AREA = 89.48 AC. / ,250 4 /28 /29^� �2 6 I 259 � �bFj�c� V� 7CK 2/0 ti < 'o „ � ¢/ s 7 6 /7000 MIN. LOT SIZE = 10,000 S.F. ;:•• 47� o �8� °0 /o 0' 0 szs� 2�0 ,� 00- R �� •;: r"`.: TOTAL NUMBER OF LnT3 = 280 RESIDENTIAL 0 ,3ro0 fl /O�J Q1 � /O,/�5 � /�/2 \2 ii .•3551f �� L77 ' I 7/.2 N o /2s' Slao. p -,o, .+... ., s:•.. , ; ;. •:: : I RETENTION = 2 /a 5� ^ N O /o,3ro - (o(p.7 - S /FEET ,'S �zo 8' z.39 / 2l0/ :P_„S, �� �'C:. .. '1':: %••. : 1 WELL SITE = -9 a '� - _ LANDSCAPE = O — _ s o o� c = J /o R, iza ems- 3/2' S:p.0047 C68-6) as �, ,tea ,S- �h 2 �' � 2�2 �' ' CONC. BLOCK WALL.7og % /•`� e I ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER 2/9 220 'moo - Zlo3 210� z //B •4/ /5 E Co/B. 4r 3 - /o,r WATER '� 22/ l s I (off -7s' - -7s' 7CP �- eo' //9' Q 43' 2p2 ( 2/2 3 3�"R.C.P. 28 SU,PFACE ro7 ti �7.4 2 �oo� 2,37 10, //o� ��' G5� V,u 620- 190-006, 007, 008, 009, 011, 013, 014 8k 017 .. 45 ro �a7. 2z s, S" s 65.E 'S' /a,�35 0 ` _' = v ,�/oa-r� llv0 /lo/ /l02 �. /!o /!04 /l05 i'•••. ¢zoQS /o �- .o o ;`; 706 i3c�pj5g' 0 0 (5900l1 i 7s' ,,12�� 223 ooRo / 1o2.<D2 l.� a !0%l0 �° .2 (� ` (� Q 41 ra5 5 ",•. •`'• /G/B5¢ 2/,3 /Q a s, 75' 1 N p O � \) :''r• o PARK ef R�TENT%ON ,s /5 20/ C /92 Bo ( ��95//'S- 2 235 /25' 4500 /O, /O,OGiOr� /3,970 Qy 4' i �/ •� 44 vat Ro y �1 R 22 /0-3501fr 234 233 2.�2 ,o //,�25�r ' �ii :y �.//Ac.Ff. 5tord e / o U� /90 �o� ��o. �� �'O N � C70-2 0�`3e �o� yo 2/g �� >s- ,o ,7O � ' � '3 0.0040 yy • ENTRY � \,, ".. 1 /o,e9s� /o (a�S.0 / 9 0 225 /,Bio¢ AD,o�r/i /0,3�0 63 76' /¢BS '�, 2/ - .�28 oYE - Io ems" � , °' cos' P /0'�5 -0•Do�O /0,58 4y v �n I STA. 31+57.G s" P'` �G4.9 r. . �•� '`z% �5. ` $. ', 5' � -- /,s� 80' o Q Q CONNECT TO 6,,rl6r WATER h A R=ago r 170 227 Bo^ �109 /2s' ,N 13�•. 2/7 ` ` 7s Bo 2h /(oB N �iO,B QC► ° M r':'•• �` �o t /a J /93 23 '% �o le /72 '.. �! �•• o c '�so�0' ss'�, � ,--/lolo !� 1, 9 �� o I 2 • Q I ••� I �� 7O' go log 9`r '235i �.7 I �� �'(p 230� 2.3/ i /o �-� - 2h /8ro l (c�� : ,', n► 63./;� N /r, o� /O,000.� �%� 40�)' V rn./01 , 9G0 v o g0 o,/io i ,� roomy /o, 4 - /0,4750 ro, 0 o, BO /73 o��o ¢ PRGtIECT S/TE 00 e ;� s-/�2 �2�' s_ °J` /9�0 `� • ' 's 6�s �'f'� lZO ¢� /� /8¢ 75' as1 ~ }c� es' ao' 80 � WAN �1 / lj I •';: /95 y 1� .I 2 �o \J h o- �� `��; ; 141 b /7& 17J� l� T I t• FR4NK S/NaTR<7 OR/VE `'r � i2 o /B3 0. /77 /o�o� �6 �� r�7' '•.•.' r6O 7cf0 o /79 /, 8 ._ ! /ace � ,F , -- ' " �O `'��i h (a�.5 :� '2 ' N O s. (r,ap s6 s- 3/Ao� 1., o �S �' /g240glll�e , Z./ �2/ Ni - (v �`' /Z /7� 4 vl o I 0 s Nib 39 p / ,gyp• c,, moo- os, 7e /O,.�oOI�J /O,OGY�'I g •� � �� O °p � , h 5;5� h .��./ P`2Go / �^ ,l s Qh �S- / go' SOd`l y0 �, lO,220 1� .3g �_ STREET _ 00.04 - s / 9 bh /8 _ s=o.00 —.... - ' ; 58.zo' I�. 5T 8 3 Q 0-51 4Sh �' �\ ems- c> 7040 40 L - 5G9 - _ — A. 2 fo y 6 R 6� j o' .� .: CON/UE["T TO EX/5T SEWER h g 2./ TYP./ 1�6 37 O 3.3 as' as' as' �o� o %� 9 3�0 � aa' eo -- ' S_ �, i- /NV. Ei:E6!=250/3 0 V �04 0 /9 470 2�h %off �, /3 /2 // /p 9 8 7 wArER /�FAc 7-6eo \' � G.' O N ��7 3o �O/. 71 !L✓O �o�7 �/.� 68. �B„R.C.P I �' i COUNTCLUBro78 /G055 C/ � 35,5/0 ¢S ./2Qc.Ft7O2P74d Q1 / //,935� /O&--70 1 /D,CYXJ /O,CL'!� /O,G� /O,DCYJ /O CY,t� xo'ono /0000,0 /0'000 5fora 4f //4 5!� !/475tj1 9 37o t/! - - W, l/4 CORNER - --- --- /75' /75' /5' /2B' /�5 — ... 5 B5 .., rOB' 97 os' /ct�' 9s' _ - - I - :,;- 2:/ rYR Z�o07. 20 _I LANDSCAPE a� TE T s'e�'RM �- 0 25 - 4 4 s ZIN06- y_ ._.. •• - :;�' :T'. �:; (o' CONC. BLOCK !NA4L /PE N /O/V 9 CF" TO PAS R ,... .._, •, •.. ;; „ •.•• .: .•.. ,... , . • . ;� f.. .. Q/00 = SIDEW,4LK �Sx7„ OPEN/N!3 .• w n - .. ;:.. , :`'''r'-, ;,� ti l00 - /Oro CF.S. W/LL FLOW • I . •c.r. .. 4:. .. i••: -i s . .i. '. . .. _. .. is` - THRU 50.YYo" WALL OPENlNG� V/C1417 K lI hP - OVER THE SIDEWALK NO SCALE - _ IN 300480 V r ' i I AMENDMENT IN THE CITY OF PALM DE- •• ._ ,.,.� : :; • ,- ;;r� �,r ,r,L SERT, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE , STATE OF CALIFORNIA DATE N0. DESCRIPTION ^ %. �,�NE,� t P- ACT NO, 2. 4%54,- %�� 0 FRANK SINATRA DRIVE 51A 79 4 43 r PHASING LANftwTal�A BEING A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION 0 THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 6 EAST, -- � �AN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN L o r c �' 'ONc ' �- -- ,� - ROBERT BEIN, WILLIAM FROST � ASSOCIATES -;, -}-1 CHARL ES HAVER 51 A SSOCIA TES DIVISION 771 k I I 5 , �0 _� l /03 /02 , /O/ /OB A P R I L 19 8 9 -- ; SCALE A L E Q. 0 /05 /04 ' _ � I = 100 � 0 50 100 200 350 500 /0,090 /0,080 3i0 Q 1 9B' /Z4 77' 72' Qg w 55 /'UE r �, I - °0 , STREET H 0� �� iz 772 �75.85 /0 ---- I y STRE000 I aR- • ti, o STREET „H„ 8, �- ENTRY �o S z 9 0 ^ i -� 93 92 9/ 90 EPHONE N. r� v p 78a `�' 77.8 7�.7 //2 �� _ ,�,4 rER A5 G ( � 75 - L crR�c/r MAIN l!/ T E S - ` B5 8 B 7 /5 0 ELE�.4T/ON 73 Z R/�v Raw E;Ag L. SL OPE . S N. T.5 ' OWN ER DEVELOPER LEGEND BARON 'S GROUP i FINANCIAL RO FI L PQOE� RICHARD J. KROTZ _ 1 FEEL = /O/ 50' ��/ PAD ELEVATION 69 - 730 HWY. III SUITE 212 B2 / ``� 79 7B o,c p I N ��65I EXISTING CONTOUR RANCHO MIRAGE , CA . 92270 '73.G� �i SQUARE FEET !'6!9) 328 - ,,5� /o / 3 7- TEL EPHoNt �� 0-- GRATED D RY W E L L INLET 75ELECT/Pic/rY ��---wArER f----i CATCH BASIN s cA5 w ,i i• -, I a B5 a .• SANrrn ' - �„ ----�� I , PHASE BOUNDARY 72 s 7� �, o /�7 ! ENGINEER :73 7q 7 EARTHWORK C. ENGI . _ K QUANTITIES ( y 72i Q ROBERT BEIN, WILLIAM FROST AND ASSOCIATE ' 79¢ �� � CID17 I � CUL-of- 5AC 5 FREET 1 �� o/�� 7 �� � � 7z0 i � 5 , S (PAP/I/,4TE) EXCAVATION = 292 , 255 CHARLES HAVER AND ASSOCIATES DIVISION -5: - �0 3 / , ^ //B NO 6CALE ,c � -- OVEREXCAVATION - 120,610 74- 390 HWY. III `1 ';'yF%SAL� i � ' =40 7/. ° �� SUBSIDANCE ( .25 ) - - 36, 315 PALM DESERT CA . 2 9 9 260 ,� HRINKAGE (. 15 %) _ - 56 485 (6 9) 346 ••- � ,� I - 7481 FAX (6 19) 34 6 - 8 315 TOTAL CUT = 320 , 065 7/ 70 l0 9 l� 67 �o -- r o, 7/.l0FILL OVEREXCAVATION BACKFILL 12 61 0 /.� - - � 120 I 0 / j- ` � = TYPICAL LOT TOTAL FILL 4 �s=r� T = 29 ,85o EXISTING ZONING 75 �' �, ^ 2O i 'fi. ,- � ,. � NO 6CLaL E E . C f�z.o EXCESS �o , . 7/.2 NOTE- P.4D ELEi/ SET /.D:G�ol�E = 2 5,2 15 - P R. 5/ P R. 10 To,,- eawe AT L ntv � I� „CURE J�Ge/rT&.k 0 ;�a� TYPICAL LOT CRO55 56CT10A.1 -�: � PROPOSED LAND USE 7069 " �� 8 wo sc.4LE r SINGLE LOT RESIDENTIAL / v CONC. ,BLOCK WALL ;.. ... •." •' �-. ': "• ,� _r• r � , A/ �9"3937"f 32 ' 1 &o ,�„ - -- - - - - -- '� 7/.8 S9 S8 5"7 5� �' �R�s j /3 /96 /3 7 /38 /39 /40 /¢/ /g /43 /44 /46 /4w /¢7 < _ UTILITIES_ E S �7.2 �, 7 o� / ` 0 70•5 / �ro9.8, D7& 7. 70 ((o,(. ' SEWER C .V.W. D• ro /5,g/O/1f WATER C.Q.W. D . 1<c' /00704 /qc ,� /o, � /n, /O �7 9 P.-�' 80' � GAS SO. CAL. GAS CO. O 52 ° _ 5T/PEET G7o9 uC�, G=5Z3' Ll5 /5-0 J 53 5¢ 55 `� /��5" P`y6 5 =a.00�o y - - -s- o.0040 __ - - - s=o.0040 *' - `^1 ELECTRIC S0. CA. EDISON � 70. �970 . ;oo" = , � /� � 90, ��� TELEPHONE G.T.E. /�,4� 75 - ID,45/ j 48 240 25� 255 271f 27.E 272 7 7D �. sjo TELEVISION PALMERCABLE / 701 - 9 4(4'R70 �� Op -� ' \ 8 , o.6) � ,-- -- -L. 290 ff / /o�_� 11/' � � 117, /� h T � � s=ovog -- /3 J o 247 -�o v;o� 253 256 2 2�09 to SCHOOL 50 �09 J 70. �o.�o` ll D °� lo�'o� �7 75 7 _� T -- -- - 20� - /�450� �� "' �' /o/8D <<' ,2s /52 v DESERT SANDS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 7� _07 Zoe m 278 2 Q RAC •--_ o /iOT � , 7vo 1007 l09¢ /2�0 410 0 ,�° 25/ 25Z 257 27� (oG 7 / 2 <�I , 1 W 425) so o 70. @ '. /� N, o /o coo /s o¢o `� ;8 70 i o 10 »8 , n �' 205 1 /3 2g i' 780aiN SUMMARY 710 7/4 GROSS SITE AREA = 91.15 AC. ,� NET SITE AREA = 89.48 AC. o 2/O 44 /2�9 /z. 244 5 9 '� � I � - � / o� (7/3 � � � ) o 7 , � Zlo(o� ocm � � . LOT SIZE = IG,000 S.F MIN. ^ 47 �8 + o �_�� _S;/ �__ �72 24 2100 /4 3 7 1 r''' , I TOTAL NUMBER rF I_r`T - = 2PO RESIDENTIAL = L77 ' ;� � ,.3�0 ,a, O 5� � 1 � RETENTION 1= �' 20 - - _ �-� - - -- --- ARE -- �`�� - �� _ o' `.'c.. _ • = 2 . `> ET �B 0, , r o s WELL SITE - ^ n - -� - 3/2' s=v.0 - - LANDSCAPE - 0 77 s_ 749 N I /325 - in _ ��� 8 io /��o (o CONC. BL47 OCK WALL .__.__ 'tea. =s 2<02 80 _. �/ �,° ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER 4 '� 6_ 4/ _ 220 v 2l0 4 9 3� /O \ 1 620- 190-006 007 008 009 011 013 014 8 017 4•J 202 3�"RCP. J SUPF�E �74 o l2I - , . , , , , U' S9.9 `"¢ 7./i - 's �05.� 's , " /o, o l02 /l03 /l04 /l0 5 =Z7¢ / /a 5': _ o 35 /�a�� 0 9 _� 7 /5� /&0 /6o/ / �7 o o _ _ o,„jz 71 moo Q , /06, �s �Y i55' `r' 5 O � / `-% 223 asz `� '�' �' 67!� a - k y C(o �> 1 j5G 202.35 /3 970 Ab Q f ' 44 /-� °s o Co.//Ac.Ff 5toro9e _ /9/ R 22¢ /0 3so¢ 234 233 �N �99 z Ro\ �c (lo�a vi / � 59.�9 _ °° 78.�z '+, 214 9O .q C ti /4,OloO ,5 R: 20 _L-/90 to S 3/ 9.62 �,B951d 63 / 2 5 0 / ''n4 NTRY of ;� � \� 2GL� o lo7S) � -� I � /89 � � ,P•, ��, /%B/D /O,GL'YY�I� i0,3°� �' �5• ��.-- ' iU0�0�` s ���� os' P /O'�05 5 00ce 4- /7/ /D 58 I 57 6 w s R° -O• SrA. + 7 Q i CONNE T TO EYrST WArEg c% L 2 = � ��`✓ i2 /99 (o.!� /� �, Z ..�'. ' - -__ %� l� o��� 2 � -- - - � /70 � �� � �� � � ••'., ��s , ��-ram 22 7 137►�• o ftj �, 6910 Bo' h _ /93 3 os 7 ,2 <6 $ 2 R / 3 �) 72 2 /6 /� 2 v , n' �g � �_ _ , 2.35,E �� n S- � �� 9 230. 23/ / / � � Q ° �•�, I� " � rai0. �i�>) /�2 9G0/9 7 �'h� 0�5� /OJ ��/ � //,34p"� �, � /0 9G 0 ,.3, c I ems' /iz zi 3J /85 9s /ooa� /o, /o,¢/s� '✓ /73 ,. Q PRGt/ECT SITE L es' a I,'u' ^� ��1 / o LQ lU f 5 T o � 7 Bo o S g �� /63 �U / /7�0 /o,c� I 3 Oo FPANK S/N,4 T;PLa OR/vE � ,/ o, �, $ ��' �a8 h to 781 W + 'S.'z- o� o !6 080 � /82 /8/ /BO o /7 5 / `•:'r T,� h 2 to O off �J /o, � " � :•, �,p •� ��/ h ��ti o0 /c9o5,�1 4990 �;� %!/2 6) ) �� �9 /o 0 8 �,. °s o 55 o \ - 4�� 10,1200 �cbo , /q /3CY.t� 6�.04 ,s h s 90' �' /v ao /0.35olIJ hh l0 4Co0 r io c 3� -- 5TiPEET - - G ti s- /i /8 - s-o.0040 - n ;22' Q -- _ _ - .49 Si 9 58.2 srA. �03 37 33 e� �� 76' ��, �, 6 r�� /) s" G=/090' PTO EY/ST SEINER - }; ig \10 16 48"RC 5 I i /NV R ! -250./3 V N / . 41 0 O , 70,,¢ o `,z7o of 2�hj 32 31 30 i G^°� G8 moo\' os ova �Q ��Q� ��`"J h /S /S� /3 i2 / /c� °J 8 7 6 wATE�' ZC �u3 7 \ 3 � 7 �g¢tee zo,/� ���� G9./ r82 (07,9 wl m 7 84 Z7 9550 O ' � ° 04:0) �", *DO 60 7 G1� 5 '3 ti COUNTRY c�uB �� /Z64 (ot /3,sis� i,93 , ,� WELL 5/TE Z9,2s7 p O /O /OOGL'v� //0301�1 /O,/6p /D/607 //,785l! W. /4 O:PNER _ /7s'_ 175 ' 16, _ /2e' //5 _ _ os' /ao' a<, _ _ �50 �97'_ 38 (57A. f 53,&0) ( CQ�IC, BLOCK wALL N89*4/ �/7"E 0607. ZQ' J ` LANDSCAPE of /PETCNT/ON 5'B�Q�./ �;r- Q 25 = 49 CFS TO PAS 5 UNDE .. ..,..; .- - .. ... ... � %` .. r r' .; IDO _ S/DEWI�LK 25X 7' OPE d , r .• , ..,... Q _ Q i I ._ , ► :-i. s TNiPU 50'r6' WALL OPEN/� til ,o- /DO CAS. WILL FLOW UlC/�lllTY MAP V T HE D L Dt/I iiOER E ,4K l A10 5C q LE AMENDMENT SCALE: . . . : .• . �:- - --: •:, ,, _ ;•� ;�`7 ! :t IN THE CITY OF PA - DESERT, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE STATE OF CALIFORNIA _ _ L M RT .. . �. :..'.... ti-: r�..•,..• �.: : -.- !r-t ,r•t; DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 4 „ FRANK SINATRA DRIVE - sr N. 1 COiP EREN A IV TRAC MA � N 0 5TA. 79 46o. 43 2- 4 zp") - --� _ t '� BEING A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 6 EAST, - __ - - rv69 -1 27 F / .�_ j SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN - — ^ L AA/D5CAP£� AREA ' 6' CONC BLOCK W4,Z_ \ for; ., , ,. ROBERT BEIN, WILLIAM FROST 8 ASSOCIATES 75 70 STREET L- 325_'�,8 r �// 7 5 = o 00,40 --- • S� CHARL ES HAVER 8 ASSOCIATES DIVISION 7/ �s' �o' _ I /03 � 102 , /O/ n /OB APRIL, 1989 - -- SCALE I'� 100� ��•8� 7� � �z � `; o' I o' r . x \ p . /o,/osq�d ! 4_ 5 0 200 350 500 / zs, Q /2,240 /l,3/0 Q� 10,090 IO,o80 /f/ /r1o40� t /P /�j/ W 104' 77' 70' B5 .. � r►� ,y �D' rrs 9!o 07 /o� 4 I �-C75e� • 4, p (� ;a Q(,G p /o/30� /0,Gb0 �c I ( t U Q 134, . � , o - ` 392' STRE �}, L=5os'' 'H" ". n /// � \`.` N � ,\v./ ,: r- f---20�o _ g �_ 20�---► M1 _ • � � �n: O p /�I� ELEI�T/�/k' 1► ► 80' s=o 0/09-- TRY ��, STREET it EN •�� 12, 5 � ,. . •/ N.T. 5. ,� ,o, ° C,4aLE TECEVr�ON 2 •9-'� 92 90 o Q TELEPHONE a 0 o O 75a, 77 ° /i2 ) ELECTR/C/TY �-- ATER ` O 7lD• / •(p / I ) i• SAN/TA.P}� SEh1E"�c' " . •-• /3&-00 10,7900 / - 92 79 MAIN PiPII/ATE STiPEETS NO 5'CAL E �,' -- -- _ fAO ELEVATION ` x • ... 67 /0000 R h, R W G.c�P� ,� TYPICAL $LOPE' /a,3�gr" la, I I N. T.5' ; ,, g6, row ,;,,2o / I I I OWNER / DEVELOPER t ah 7ss 82' so' gp' � 73. (u 5'P.U.E. 3 ' 15'P.U.E. I a � BARONS FINANCIAL GROUP 3 LEGEND h 40o s =o.Q tj j RICHARD J. _ ez' ao' �' s- //5 •.r. PQoEL.=/oio' KROTZ '•,,.; B•3 6%\ O r'=• iv ? ,� r Z FFEL. _ /o/.50, PAD ELEVATION 8 � �7/ 69 730 HWY. III SUITE 212 . 0 729 0 -1265Y EXISTING CONTOUR RANCHO MIRAGE , CA .. 92270 82 • ` , h� ,?o` B/ 60 79 78 \f oo I fi^ SQUARE Q A r•,: i3 ti 9 73l0 �3) 7 12 s' a U RE FEET (619) 328 - 9111 3./ //� I ° TELEv/ /rV 0-- GRATED DRYWELL INLET CATCH BASINC7eeo� f, 75' 95 EGECT/PiC/TY —WATER r� GA5 i SAN1 d•.: e5' a /O,G�4/1 •..•, : T4P'' ' r.,• • : � 76 77 0 117 T 11 �, ENGINEER 1 EARTHWORK QUANTITIES CC.Y) "i3 , f � G•B. � • •••:,: 73¢ 73/ �' 72. 7�2 Q CUL-DE-SAC STREETS —t .t ROBERT BEIN, WILLIAM FROST AND ASSOCIATES ri 5� /0,,3 /q '���� :;;:; (PR/1�,4TE) + - __ + EXCAVATION - 292 , 255 i CHARLES HAVER AND -ASSOCIATES DIVISION � � � - :,p 72 B2, o //8 V �-_'• No SCALE 1�" s=a.�o��rrP/CAL) r OVEREXCAVATION _ 120,610 74-390 HWY. ili - 70 �_ L-moo' SUBSIDANCE (.25 ) - 36, 315 PALM DESERT, CA . 92260 SHRINKAGE 05 /o) _ - 56 485 a (619) 346 - 7481 FAX (619) 346 -8315 � d� 2h 8� 8O' ac w TOTAL CUT - 3209065 11% mot �/ 7O l0 9 l� - !0 7 !o!o I N P2 /20 �N P AL — h . b 7/.<o s I FILL - 174 , 240 7,�g 73•/ N 72.7 72.4 _ 2./ 7/.9 �j /o, 21 ! cF► I OVEREXCAVATION BACKFILL = 120 610 TYPICAL LOT • ' rc.//o ,POIJGN G,e,40E PAO EG • � rc. �- io' TOTAL FILL 294,850 EXISTING ZONING I 75' /O,/85l�! /O,,�f/ /O¢40d /O //,//2� /2p F.5.=TC I o TC• � ND ✓�-CAL E "' 95' �' �' ao' � 2i rc.fo.s' EXCESS 25 215 NOTE- RA,0 E1-6V. .5 7` /.D:4,�OVE _ , P. R. 5/ P. R.10 "µf T 4 TOP Off'CURB 4T GG*/ � G•caga5 Gel7r' F /�72oSli //,4o2d/ a r7/2 •�2l PROPOSED LAND USE : � � 07 TYPICAL LOT CROSS 5'E'CTtO;/ ':. ��• 9 ' ;•-•.,;� • '<: � SINGLE LOT RESIDENTIAL o - NO SLAG E ' ... - �, L-350' CONC. BLOCK WALL ••ti ,• , •-. ; ;• •• r l -•• \ t { - _ w . .37 ' 1171 /25 5/G ' �o S9 S6 57 5� 35 / /37 /.�B /39 /40 /¢/ /5�2 /�3 /� /45 /4lv /¢7 , /g8 /yroJ h o UTILITIES O \ 7i5 7i2 ti 70.9 70.E 70.7 ° 70 N c;v/ ��8 °t2 9 .� •3 to7.lo 7.3 7+D `tih '� SEWER C.V.W.D• /O,Qbl� /O,loB70 I h 7 /�D ` W /sBroQt o' 24' 24' WATER C.V..W. D. , o /4Q0��• //820 I� � �. �• 95' 8D' B5' . r '�2 g 709 5 0 /eon /O,G2�� /o,�� /o�/,/i /oa�/,�' /��� �o�� /oao � /oc��'. /o,�# � � 12' GAS SO. CAL. GAS CO. : rrs' eo �' ,� /c?5251,II /z lo9f/ - 28ly' G8.2lo L= 29Z' STREET 67.09 „C,� �� Z 52 S3 5¢ N /zs' - - - ELECTRIC x ELEC SO CA EDISON 55 r24' ,h�� 5 - O 40 9=0.0040 5•=0.0040 —s- ,. 41 4i� l00' /ono ® Q►� ti �'o' TELEPHONE G.T.E. �, 6°.,17 �9.5 /24 /33 r o /01 &o ;d ,�.31d3«43 ; H � 4 1 . 3 /. TELEVISION PALMER CABLE 0 70 04 � 46 249 25¢ 255 27�¢ 2 ,3 27Z 27I 270 98 /47Q1 O 7Q 4 B 4,1D ti h �otro./ ` -- -- -- '-- -- 5/ o_ ah /i zsp /og�o, �� v I ro moo• O !9 45 �' /25 25 420 r�r I //900 4r /25' 125, - 7Q,(p _ L=290' I /25 /O s /7 ( ° //7' /O, �j /QGbQ /D, �4� /O,Olbp3 ��/Z$4f /O,OG'� 4S STq 29�71.GpA 30f99 9T v /O 325� 1f 5=0 DOQ ---► /32 V _ 2 1 7 •�o V O O 253 �j!' 2 7 2�09 W19 , 6r4- ✓TA. 2 ,� _ co- A. 32 f 39.L SCHOOL BD � /0 � 27fG3. 8 �1 G2 2 Q 9.dj �� 71� m° ° � to . 107. /�o ' 0 75' .g 3 125 a2 q la5i- �I --- - - - --+— 50 0 / ¢r /�ot v+ N a v L-- — DESERT SANDS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 7DlO 2 8 0 45o t�f, /O,/ m /2s /2s 278 279 /52 Q —— t A S 0 O7 20 IJA w v O 7 N' '% h o 10,67040 srA. zO 53.�z _ 6r4. 31 t 69 60 o r,�a0 , 10�7 1094 3 15 51 z5Z 257 27 ti 2l0$ V a /o v w. //4 COR. a - 9 — — — — — ——— — — I r�:• � 9 /o,rr /o�� 07 /o�70 `'� /i,400� � � — -- , n � s _ `(11 0 000 /5,D�f0 /8,G ` s SUMMARY /27l0 7 � �' , -- o s o COOK STREET ENTRY t '•t 264 8 7/ k 3�/rx,, 1G7' �' !a►7.0 s �0 280 (6�r,/ _�N �� Oo - /2s' ,25 2s' s- oo ` /54 N. '6. GROSS SITE AREA 91.15 AC. ' 7j n % /o,c h 2�3 2 2 �3 /�,/50 t� �5 2 ��F�F V �O /25 NET SITE AREA = 89.48 AC. / .250 g 59 �� I /o qy ! MIN. LOT SIZE = 10,000 S.F. 2/D 4� r8.0 6s-, 2 47 0 l3 ` G.�B) -� lBloc'c „525 / -' Q 6R ' • : •r-�,: TOTAL NUMBER OF LOTS = 28n RESIDENTIAL = 277 s • � o � /4,�0 � �o,.� /,/iz T2 �� _ �� ro /s __ _.••• �` 7/Z H 01 /ZS' S 667 � BS 3' �/ O ,sB$ , .. -J ' °'••1 L. : `:•• � 'fjf 1 - :: - :� RETENTION 2 ^ /o, •�, WELL SITE = I '., /a 5�� _ AND CAP = O 31 5=p. 47 — L S E ' .. 4l0 8 7/. ` �, 280 P _ p _-___ -� co/vc. eacocK ,WALL I ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER • Qy 1/ 3 , _ _ 3./ _ 2/9 220 -2b Zlo3 2G _f ro,/ �' --- t 2/2 2/Q w,4 t,P <07 ti 22/ 237 h _s -�s' ��' Bo eo' /i9, 43 620- 190-006, 007, 008, 009, 01I, 013, 014 8� 017 202 _ 3 36MRc.P. sU,�/�acE <� ro7.4 'Fee 0o i0,/104 � •/ ti � � �� 'yo,� �\ Q - ?74 �" 9 /O6'oo� /o o� 6 / s, s ! s- /o,¢.3sc/r ,oa�� /o_ I ,�• /59 160 /lo/ /!02 0 /lo /!04 N /l05 O �' /55' /0.060 o 5900GhON � ' �20 2o PARK a� �f'4 gs 9a. /� 9 �,� S- ,2 ems' n o 10, ro oao� 13,970 5 � o �� �. ° r25 � _ :,,`' _ I • - • T, 22 234 233 2 //,1025 �' u .. � vo s$ Co.//Ac.F{. SfOr�9e /o /03 -32 � O � 50l,� " �o� o h 'R �.8 U1 " / < LO 59.(9 _ m 58 Z •ems + �, s� _ _� (ora3 G ti N L /90 5TA. 3/ 69.oz r • � /9D - - G;7 o'-6,oQ, �o' /`f �__�� :o,7,a f' 'S 6=00040 w E:NrRY D `� t� a/o /oa� i ro,3�o 63 5• - - ,. "� o /415 ✓ O o_ a� 6 E Q / 5 40 1(1,0 Ord O /0,58 o STA. 3/a-57.G 4,3 `�- �r• 1�i9.6 9 o—G9 r. . Gig �o� �', ST/PE'ET �A ,! CONNECT' TO Er/5T WATER P �S� 2 99 l07.2 6 24"RCP �� /�_ -z �2 s _ 4 �' ., .� /70 � `� � �� M ;''.• ps 227 S, F Bo' jG�9 /2s . , 1 9 - /f 7105 / 6h �08,l0 2 67.p 2/7 s 8o R'�P• /(oB .0 �00.8 • Op 3� ° M '�•' �`` `moo �' 4P ,o6�� �2h j/93 23 a os /87 .2 22 22 I /!o /72 . ,- 2 �,•; .Q�� 70 , SO g •2,35 ( ti �ct'o./ � c2 ,o,23p�6 �o�.'(o ,;� 23/ 1/,5B5d1 �J 3 m r p. j `"-vim /o,000 ° t � W 5 //p /OOm = loGY�l Bor BO' /0 9G0 : .� 00 / ''�:2tvegg\ ;os, ss' W o Ba' .z�� �� z� s� /8 �s ' �o, /o,¢�s�i - '3 ' Q PRGUECT SITE /q 173 7Lt�f s-/zz� v s /9<0 _ �` ro 's ' �\ '�'�� l20 /84 7s' -_ s' es eo` as ;/75 SIN w1 / tL w\ • • • Y .9 /9 / " O •� h 80_ •9. F.224NK S/N.4T,PA OR/VE a' W /77 / �i 35` .. /2 5 � J 2g 2 .� /B3 7(0 /oc�.� � ,► oo t %•. /��Boi G� /o, off, e s �h a -,S o ' o ra3 /82 /8/ /60 o /79 178 o ►. 67 f 7. 7 6- v �O � N , s6o 3/ o/d hl �� �G /g2411" g� 2/ / /.8 �• ! 4 v' _ �G? roe /7� � v I i �0 s- h :� /,c9lX-!� /t7�f90�! r//25 �� /9 > /Q2 I // /3GZ� �° .0 J�9.� o I < W 39 D n .ao, cs �+:`J o� ,�_ 9� /a rep / / /o, /g 3 °p ` , .3�' R 2`0" ST/PEET zz o •. Q p �� - iog5sc 1h �o\\_ _ GGo4 _ "/,g ah 8 - S�:pD04o - 9 L= 5G9'` 5g2o'hh 1 _ �.� 5TA. 2Ei A03 .- , ryp, 9 3 as•' a5 es' O. � �. t • CANA16U' TO EXIST SEWER 37 �. saw R O ��0 1 �'� �' Bo ,�• 250•/3 �' 1<o F 70,4 0 /g ¢70q� 2`h 32 3/ 29 W28 %R\ Q`s� �h /�7�� /S /St /3 /2, // /c� 9 7 wArERz0 ;� ki ti• 8 wT7 �_ qq�)�` 6 � N 1a2. l0?3 �02 �o% 7 �✓O 7 �OL4 `off R.GP O I CO[/NT.2Y CLUB OR/VE /3�70 G2o /i¢ 74p� /i 935 /og.�o{� /oax�¢ /oc /ooa�Qf OGbq� cl ` Ft Coro i W. 1/4 c"oRNER h -�Q1 //,4754� 9,3701,/l a - r c - E /o, /o, /off A , , - S r - _—�. — 3S /75 /28' //S 5 B5' > - >1G6 7 : O , ��, ys /75 /5o. -- •-;. 8°J E ` LANDSCAPE` ��TENT/Q = 49 CF5 TO PASS UNDER .'� B E K 25 0 • . :••.. - • •' 2:I rYP 6' C�1VC LOCK !HALL - S o W.4L 7" PE/t/rNa ♦ •• 'C ... ... . : ' •' '••� ✓~ '•••�• •' /'•,, ~•• j .t.i:•.. , .1 J }'• /�� C.F.5. TO PA55 Q _ .. - ��:_. t'; ti /00 /o6 C.r5. WILL FL`ow VIChVI T Y -MAP • �+ Tz1RU so.r6' WALL OPEti/n 3 •- /• • •. •. . # _ ;'.. .. .. _."� • L'. •� ti..•, •i ij OVER ,4 K •o,J �-' ti r ,•.... . . I DEG(/ L . ... . , J N 4- 0 FRADING GENERAL NOTES F' 1. ALL GRADING TO BE DONE IN ACCORDA14CE WITH THE CITY OF PALM DESERT GRADING I ORDINANCE. ! 2. THIS PLAN IS FOR GRADING PURPOSES ONLY. ISSUANCE OF A GRADING PERMIT BASED ON THIS PLAN DOES NOT CONSTITUTE APPROVAL OF DRIVEWAY LOCATIONS AND SIZES, PARKING LAYOUT, BUILDING LOCATION, WALL HEIGHTS AND LOCATIONS, OFF-SITE yi DRAINAGE FACILITIES, OR OTHER ITEMS OPERATION. iJOT RELATED DIRECTLY TO THE BASIC GRADING 3• A LETTER OF CERTIFICATIO14"FROM THE ENGINEER-OF-WORK STATING THAT THE GRADING HAS BEEN COMPLETED PER THE APPROVED PLAN, AND A COMPACTION REPORT FROM A t" SOILS ENGINEER ON ALL FILL AREAS ARE REQUIRED PRIOR TO THE BUILDING PERMIT oco ISSUANCE. 4. ALL WALLS SHOWN ON THESE PLAN SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF , COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, ISSUED A SEPARATE PERITIT AND BE INSPECTED BY THE r DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING AND SAFETY. THOSE WALLS SHOWN AS RETAINING WALLS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED TO CITY OF PALM DESERT RETAINING WALL STANDARDS OR BE SUPPORTED BY ENGINEERING CALCULATIONS AND DETAILS. 3S, 4f��f 5 �p5 RE~t4 S. THE ENGINEER-OF-WORK SHALL BE NOTIFIED WHEN CONSTRUCTION HAS COMMENCED. GVTrE'R Ai%,O Co .�y_CPOrD 6 /� VV . IN THE EVENT OF DISCREPANCIES AND/OR DEVIATIONS ARISING DURING CONSTRUCTION, CO 0,��/SWAY a>tc THE GINEER-OF-WORK SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DETERMINING Alt ACCEPTABLE OLUTI 91 p ON AND REVISING THE PLAITS FOR APPROVAL BY THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC �0'P. L ((D�rl� WORKS 6� ' 1 _ - 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL DAMAGES TO ONSITE, OFFSITE AND ADJACENT UTILITIES, FACILITIES AND PROPERTIES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL NECESSARY AND PROPER PRECAUTIONS TO PROTECT 8l4� ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS FROM ANY AND ALL DAMAGE THAT MAY OCCUR FROM STORM - WATER RUNOFF AND/OR DEPOSITION OF DEBRIS RESULTING FROM AIJ AND ALL WORK IN i CONJUNCTION WITH CONSTRUCTION OF THESE GRADING PLANS. poop 9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS (619) 346-0611 AT LEAST 24 HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCING ANY WORK. k W K j 10. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE LOCATION AWD PROTECTION OF ALL UTILITIES. FOR THE ASSISTANCE CALL: LOCATION OF U1IDERGROUIlD UTILITIES, OR FOREMERGENCY 0 ` SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COIIPAIIY 1-800-422-4133 SO µ - "" ' . SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY �c �• Q 1-800-422-4133 ° GE14ERAL TELEPHONE C014PAIIY Q h 1-800-422-4133 VALLEY COACHELLA I Y WATER DISTRICT 398-2651 - 30 PALM DESERT WATER AND SERVICES DISTRICT 346-6338 p9 PALMER CABLEVISION 6 �(.' 340-2225 • r 11. ALL PROPERTY CORNERS SHALL BE UNDISTURBED BY THE GRADING OF THESE IMPROVE- MENTS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE RESTORATION OF ALL LOST i a ' OR OBLITERA TED ED MONUMENTS, AS SPECIFIED BY THE L111dD SURVEYORS ACT. p 12. THESE PLANS NAY BE S,x UBJEC T TO REVIEW AND /OR�!D/OR REVISIOI! BY THE CITY OF PALM h p �jgB o DESERT DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, IF C014STRUCTIOII HAS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN N Eo �h• �, 12 MONTHS FROM THE DATE OF APPROVAL BY THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS. I � 7.5• 7•B• t � , EL. 62.eO b W P.4 EL. 62.so V C1Y, 6R01-I,EE IVOMES ( /. �,00a of EX/ST//✓G G.PADE r 79-8//-B CO41AI7 ' CL!JB OiPlk'EF 2. 000• D PiPD�SED aA=W.DE P L Q o - BE.Pit�lUO/1 OC/A�fe5, CX1. 92201 4� V .3. 0 h Y; ° hti � L a o � G. T C_ TOP Of "110IFa } ,COT-9.9 `1 h ,,_ PROPERTY�ODRES.S' r' �cc/ .E.L. 6.2. 3 � F.L• FLOs�Y L//1/E' 77R TOP OF'PAYEiY1Eit/T 0 1 LOT-45 C'�S�'/Vl1�NBER ff� P L �'.POPERTY L/NE 1 w el- 6'/ 7 4 K 1:, � �� POOL �° � f//l/✓O`3/E,L L. /YlONU�YJE/VT " � ��,• � ,AT�` /�I/TERSECT/O/v Coo.4�S'T ' (. 0 o = ` p JE�4RTf�l�YOrPoIr . . . �, 3 - 2j E SS 71-1 IV _-50 C. Y T�I YL OR Vi 5L0 E o•SO°o l7� `. X,o. 3�-��9�.: r�}.. CO L//V7 Y CL!/B 0.4• C x , • 0 GN _ i B/.D _z J`/TCf/ ENGAtiEERS /NC. C1roy Oo= o'w`lw ae5hwT 3 PO• BOX -0S.ey A4L,t? aw-sz T � 1410 . .S'/ CA. 1226/ '9-34.3- 7GG7 G'R�4p//VG PLAit/ LOT N• ��APf'ROliEO .BY•' J , 3 Pc;�;/ Er,L. COO.(�� � S A P , PAS BY' TiP,4G'T/Yo• ?�5.30-/ ' ' .P/G.�✓,4iPIJ c% fOC�ERS C/T Y E/VG•//VEE/P � rP�E• 41,p 2S 7/ - -- - R.C.E. ZS320 r; � OATS•• // /�9 / __..- -.__.. .-_ -._____- __._ --.... \L._.__..._......._...�.�.,�+-.-.•r--..-...._.,.�--.---....rr-..-...-..w.r,...+.�..++rm.•.r++wnsnwtow..ewrz.�r�.re +w.vsw..e.ir®..wa < r , A, Sir IN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, COUNT," OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA SHEET 2 OF 6 SHEETS TRACT N01�16 24530 ,-- 1 A PORTION OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTH=(�'�ST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP5 SOUTH, RANGE 6 E4.7T, SAN 3ERNARDINIO, BASE AND MERIDIAN ROBERT BEIN , WILLIA41 FROST 8 A SSOCIA TES NOVEMBER 1989 FO 0 /00, 200' 3ucl' 400� L.6.4807 �E.P .Ps 79//3 �. ACGEPTEO SCAG CORNEP OF 5' C- 4 'RANK S//VA T/PA D�/j �� R FO DRL15S D15K STLJit/IPED )C 1`6. 70 AGGEPTE"O A5 _ ---�- ('iVBg°52'00'E 21045,20� A109049'59 'E 2104� 22 T.4 5 �P G E. /1!2' CD�P• OF 5EG.4 016 7.756, E . Q. �yTSR ENGINEER ' S NOTES : �sr5591 .m S33 54 53 ' B 1 . BASIS OF BEARINGS IS THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 4, T, 5S. , R.6 E. , S. B. B. & M. BEING N89°49' 50," E `N PER R.S. 6 7/97. 0N 2 . • = FOUND MONUMENTS AS NOTED . N I 3 . 0= SET 1 " I .P . WITH PLASTIC PLUG , STAMPED L.S. 4965 PER CPD . STD . NO . 300 TYPE "B" . /V89°40'SB'E 1324.5I' 4 . ❑ = SET 2" I .P . WITH PLASTIC PLUG . STAMPED L.S. 4965 PER T,1 :71 CPD . STD . NO. 300 TYPE "A" . .COT N; ' 5 ( ; = RECORDPER R.S . 34/38 . 4C 6 . [ ] = RECORD PER R . S . 79/ 13. 3 2? - N �� 3v 1 lR % • < >= RECORD PER R . S . 67/97 . PatN N N c� 8 . SE' ' FAD & TAG , STAMPED L.S. 4965 IN THE TOP OF CURB ON THE j ! PROLONGATION OF SIDE LOT LINES IN LIEU OF FRONT CORNERS , ANC ( �C�9¢! E z�7eO' _ IN THE "ACE OF THE CONCRETE BLOCK WALL AS P . O . L . IN LIE!1 OF 3c ,� 23'°0 I � ' t� E LOT CORNERS COINCIDENT WITH BLOCK WALL , PE CPC . STD . .35,- EVE — +'— Q REAR TYPER N =R Q .,C. • LOT I O (� 9 . THIS 8 1 V HIS SUBDIVISION CONTAINS 19 .49 GROSS ACRES . �j N � _3S/38_ n_/_B9'4/49 E•24Z "� _� ''0�//1/!i7�N � � f� � J � �t B22o' �' �r C v %I 10 . ALL MONUMENTS SHOWN AS "SET" SHALL BE SET W!THIN ONE �� I YEAR FROM REC0RDAT;Ji� ' F THIS MAP P5 f3 f7 m;Q p 0 11 . S. W . I .=SANBORN WEBB, INC . 2f 23 P2 !J L 12. G.L.O. =o v VGENERAL LAND OFFICE 0 o m o N �� I 48 17 a 6 z �I�, A EASEMENT LEGEND : °� 18 19 20 2! N 5f 53 52 5) 1Q AN !I EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND HIGHWAY PURPOSES IN FAVOR W n m .GDT'G o, }�' f9 f OF CITY OF PALM DESERT PER INSTRUMEN i NO. 247398 RECORDED OSBs�• Q SEw� 0 NOV. 1 , 19851 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS F �cn .► �� 3`'/2- - _ _..ix.+39' - - - - - AYL0�2 s2�.�4' AVE�t/L/E _ I �,,. 700.53' Epp ' o� l.,Or:. " zo' I JUN 1 i 1990 o� f S PETE�C/T1 Al ; COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT N 15 14 13 JP J J to 9 CID-�F PALM DESERT b1 _ J� J�/ELL ,BA Jr/N Z Fe4NK -YNA2.,—A G7P. 2G50.� �� l324 93 Q Q N6B3°4i3yE \� /32C1. 9, OW NB9'4l'37"E Z1o49 87' <N89°42'02" 21051.52' .P. UP O./'TA66E0 �y¢� "� ~ v TAP./1/Qc' 530-/ 0 :� L•5. 4457 PE A19 7 . NO v`j t:� N84°57'28,w�,03'F,�M/ CU.Pi/E OATH '. ,_ , .t 111 �\ i\N ! . • _. i•� ) D. evC 155 D/SX STANI CEO L.S. COUNTPY x l 32Q OTC /O°54%5" <00. 90' 30.54 ' cu/a o,P CO) E&O09' /O°,54/8" 53,29' 2&. 73' 4/46 �iP 5.`V.I- T/E e0Ok 3427 PG.7/ AGG EPTE'O A5 T.vE EA,ST� �n 3 720.C�D O/°O7¢7" 7/0 ' GOP/UE? OF SECT/ON g Ul tN _ 'W �07.. 95 42.85' IV COUN?RY CL UB _ DRIVEsT<IM ED 5 AR IN GOP 2�1� GO" VICINITY A 2453.10/' a PEK r�? NO, 1403Z-I siGGEP7ED AS r ICINI/ / AMP 2653.G/' Z54' Sd(�TflE.467 GDPNER SECT/O1V �d ,5307 ZZ' --' N.T.5 ✓.it/ 3005/Co r. � a n u ,. _ ... .srosza�mn-r's s+s•m.mma.fc,n"e+.:u': .. . .....V .c. r„_