Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTT 24632 COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE HOMES FILE 1 1996 PRFOISE PLAN TENTATIVE TRACT — ZONE CHANGE --- PARCEL MAP VALIANCE QUP. REFER TO: APPLICANT: LOCAT ION : REQUEST:_ EXISTING ZONE: PREPARATION PROGRESS DATE BY COMMENTS APPLICATION RECEIVED LEGAL PUBLICATION SENT NOTICES SENT FIELD INVESTIGATION DEPTS. NOTIFIED 13UILDING ENGINEERING FIRE _ POLICE RE-CREATION & PARKS SCHOOL DISTRICT DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS FLOOD CONTROL c 4 PRELIMINARY MEETING STAFF REPORT 13p 2f—t�S FIN,AI_ . PLAN APPROVAL PRECISE PLAN (6) LANDSCAPING PLAN (5) PLAN. DIRECTOR MOD. (6) HEARINGS & ACTIONS m DATE ACTION VOTE REVIEW BOARD HEARING w P.C. HEARING PUBLISHED PC, PUBLIC HEARING c h APPLICANT NOTIFIED C.G. PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE NO. RESOLUTION NO. EFFECTIVE DATE RECORDED FOR DATA-BANK ZONING MAP CORRECTED ' d I� 0 U 0 • u i n t c i 0 01 620283003 Jean R & Joan Whitteman 6979 Sandcastle Dr Carlsbad , CA 92009 c t i I *** LABELS COMPLETED *** I 18 LABELS PRINTED III � I ----- - -- - - --- - - ----- Imo— - - -- -- -- — - I. 620272051 1i Ludwig & Jeanne Freiseis P 0 Box 158 Cathedral City , CA 92234 li I "** LABELS COMPLETED 1 LABELS PRINTED it I I 620281010 620281011 Helen M Theodora 11 Raymond L & Dolores Gier 4340 Via Frascati 890 Green St Rancho Palos Verdes , CA 90274 I. Placerville , CA 95667 i }I� I I www LABELS COMPLETED 2 LABELS PRINTED I I I' 620282001 Ernest & Jean Meathe 39905 Chimney Flats Or Palm Desert, CA 92260 it u I\ _ ILL { I i *** LABELS COMPLETED *** 1 LABELS PRINTED I 620282027 620282028 Bruce V & Arlene Parsons Rene A & Prudence Berger 39904 Desert Angel Dr 173770 Desert Greens S Palm Desert., CA 92260 I Palm Desert, CA 92260 .1 'f *** LABELS COMPLETED I 2 LABELS PRINTED 1 I 620282046 I Clifford F & Carol Holden 73442 Cabazon Peak Palm Desert, CA 92262 I l 1 I *** LABELS COMPLETED *** 1 LABELS PRINTED I 620283001 1 620283002 Nathan & Elsie Glaubach Arthur W Eichmann 1746 Ashland Ave 73817 S Desert Greens Or Santa Monica , CA 90405 Palm Desert, CA 92260 624021051 q 624021052 624021053 Desert R Palm jl Desert R Palm Desert R Palm 1470 Jamboree Rd 1470 Jamboree Rd 1470 Jamboree Rd Newport Bch , CA 92660 1; Newport Bch , CA 92660 Newport Bch , CA 92660 I *** LABELS COMPLETED *** 3 LABELS PRINTED r 624021056 1 624021057 j Desert R Palm Western # Mclain 1470 Jamboree Rd 1 1470 Jamboree Rd Newport Bch , CA 92660 Newport Bch . CA 92660 j I I I' *** LABELS COMPLETED 2 LABELS PRINTED hi + I� I' r 60001 I: 624260002 624260003 en P Resnick I Jackie T Williams W J & Jean Higgins licia Ct 3 Galicia Ct 9935 Nw Washington Blv Desert CA 92260 I Palm Desert, CA 92260 Bellevue , Wa 98004 624260004 624260005 '24260006 Gary F & Pauline Koger Felipe L Escobar Wright W & Maurine Gary 1060 Woodcrest Ave I' 8 Galicia Ct 10 Galicia Ct Brea , CA 92621 �I Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Desert . CA 92260 i, I' *** LABELS COMPLETED *** 6 LABELS PRINTED i I ' I �— - ---- -�.. �- --- - - - - -- - - Imo— - - ----. —�I --- -�� 624260012 j Western # Mclain 4 Corporate Plaza Ste 101 �1 Newport Bch , CA 92660 ------------ 620272016 John T & Patricia Atchison 39890 Reche Ln Palm Desert, CA 92260 L 620272019 Louis M & Roceda Russo 65 Sunrise Or Rancho Mirage , CA 92270 0272022 11 Peter & Angeline Genovese 73581 S Desert Green Or k Palm Desert, CA 92260 J L 620272025 - — -` John G & Lucille Callahan 73551 S Desert Green Or Palm Desert, CA 92260 620272030 David & Shirley Nudelman 1754 Fillmore Or Monterey Park , CA 91754 I r� 620272038 George B & Ruth Turner 39901 Blackhorse Way Palm Desert , CA 92260 i 620180017 Gerhard & Marie Befeld 26585 Valle Heights Rd Hemet, CA 92344 I I I *** LABELS COMPLETED 1 LABELS PRINTED I i 620200051 I Entre Nous Partners 71894 Highway 111 Rancho Mirage , CA 92270 I I i **'* LABELS COMPLETED *** 1 LABELS PRINTED I I I 62027100A 620271005 John M & Dorothy Mazuran j Elroy E & Leila Gilbert 39895 Reche Ln 1 39900 Black Horse Way Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Desert, CA 92260 I I I www LABELS COMPLETED *** 2 LABELS PRINTED is I� 620272009 q Asuncion R Groom 13277 South St Cerritos , CA 90701 1 I jl I� *'**' LABELS COMPLETED www ili 1 LABELS PRINTED h I� I' 620272014 11 620272015 Bertrand 0 & Germaine Coulombe I Joseph A & Dorothy Cavanaugh 39840 Reche Ln it 39872 Reche Ln Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Desert, CA 92260 --------------- --- 620272017 620272018 Michael 0 & Jean Clinton Palm Desert Greens Assn 65 Sunrise Or j 73750 Country Club Or Rancho Mirage , CA 92270 Palm Desert, CA 92260 I I 620272020 620272021 1 Ray J & Randall Jepson j Louis A & Irene Welk 1400 Sunkist Ave #188 6225 Coldwater Canyon #212 Anaheim, CA 92806 �I�, North Hollywood , CA 91606 620272023 620272024 Robert J & Beverlee Ihnat I! Robert J & Beverlee Ihnat { P O Box 961 U P 0 Box 961 La Habra , CA 90631 j La Habra , CA 90631 620272026 { 620272027 Rene M & Angela Savard II Robert W & Alpha Wolfe 73541 S Desert Green Or 1425 Rolling Hills Or Palm Desert, CA 92260 Fullerton , CA 92632 I, I 620272031 620272036 Marin A & Lucinda Guillen Albert & Irene Schatz 73500 S Desert Green Or If 670 Via Santa Ynez Palm Desert , CA 92260 Pacific Palisades , CA 911212 — i 620283004 620283005 620283006 James & Dorothy Auld Nathan & Elsie Glaubach Bonnie I & Jim Hammack 2327 Florencita Or 11746 Ashland Ave F73771 S Desert Greens Or Montrose , CA 91020 Santa Monica , CA 90405 Palm Desert, CA 92260 I 620283007 ( 620283008 620283009 Suzanne J & Mark Soto I Troy L & E Edwards li Carl J & Emilie Leno 73759 S Desert Greens Or 1661 Pine I 73735 S Desert Greens Or Palm Desert, CA 92260 1, La Habra , CA 90631 Palm Desert, CA 92260 I�I I I J 620283011 1 620283012 j 620283013 Palm Desert Greens Assn j Palm Desert Greens Assn I Palm Desert Greens Assn 73750 Country Club Or 73750 Country Club Or 737SO Country Club Or Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Desert, CA 92260 I; Palm Desert, CA 92260 20283014 j 620283015 I� ` Palm Desert Greens Assn ( Walter & Margaret Kurz J� 1 73-750 Country Club Or 73723 S Desert Greens Or — I' Palm Desert, CA 92260 j Palm Desert, CA 92260 t_ I` *** LABELS COMPLETED *** 14 LABELS PRINTED I' I. II I� 620292019 1 620292020 620292021 Robert L & Mark Hicks 1! John F & Helen Pogwist Mary E & Charles Auburn 73840 S Desert Greens Or 73850 S Desert Greens Or 73860 S Desert Greens Or Palm Desert , CA 92260 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Desert , CA 92260 I' 620292022 620292023 ji 620292024 Edward J & Betty Skeans I Marian A Bailey KarnsVincent J & Mary Roscoe 73870 S Desert Greens Or 2712 Oak Knoll Or 6036 S Bruce St Palm Desert, CA 92260 Los Alamitos , CA 90720Las .Vegas , Nv 89119 I 620292025 620292026 620292027 Milue B Hamilton Milue B & Walter Hamilton Raymond W & Bette White 73900 S Desert Greens Or j, 73900 S Desert Greens Or 70 Maximo Way Palm Desert, CA 92260 1 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Desert, CA 92260 I 620292028 — - — - I 620292029 --- Everett H & Virginia Light j William & Doris Soykin 73948 S Desert Greens Or 1 73968 S Desert Greens Or Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Desert, CA 92260 1 , % I 1 *** LABELS COMPLETED *** 11 LABELS PRINTED I 1 620293010 11 620293011 620293012 Harry & Dorothy Kovich II Louis & Joyce Suboter David L & Carol Horsey 73942 Munn Cir 73962 Munn Cir 73982 Munn Cir Palm Desert , CA 92260 I Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Desert, CA 92260 620293013 620293014 620293015 Nathan & Elsie Glaubach { Joseph W & Lorraine Cacia Raymond M & Irene Korff 1746 Ashland Ave 32112 Via Alicia 73943 Munn Cir Santa Monica , CA 90405 Sn Jun Cpstrno CA 92675 f Palm Desert, CA 92260 1 620r 293016 620293017 620293018 Cecil E & Mary Curry Edward L & Kay Schmidt Charles R & Lola Barker 73923 Munn Cir 1I 17351 Frans Ln 1178 N Glendora Ave Palm Desert, CA 92260 it Huntington Bch , CA, 92649 Covina , CA 91724 620293019 I 62029302/1 620293021 Katherine C Manville Thomas A & Sybal Whitlock Royce A & Columbina Stradley 7848 Broadmoor Or 1 3292 Oak Knoll 4140 Fair Ave #8 Orange , CA 92669 I Los Alamitos , CA 90720 North Hollywood , CA 91602 620293022 �I' 620293023 620293024 Randy L & Linda Sawlsville j,; Jacqueline Bankoff Jacqueline Bankoff 20126 Drasin Or I; 73901 S Desert Greens Or 73901 S Desert Greens Or Canyon Country , CA 91351 ; Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Desert, CA 92260 620293025 �i 620293026 - -- - -- I� 620293027 Anthony E Grimm 11 Terry L Meisinger II John R & Helen Mccarty 73881 S Desert Greens Or 73871 Desert Green Or S 73861 S Desert Greens Or Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Desert CA 92260 11 Palm Desert, CA 92260 620293028 — -_- - - -- 620293029 1 520293030 Fenwick & Priscilla Stillman Kenneth S & Mary Dobson Palm Desert Greens Assn 73851- S Desert Greens Or j 73841 S Desert Greens Or I. 73750 Country Club Or - Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Desert, CA 92260 it Palm Desert, CA 92260 I li *** LABELS COMPLETED *** I' I 21 LABELS PRINTED I I I I 622020037j1 1 Mcbail Co j P 0 Box 1056 Alamo , CA 94507 �1\� N, J 1� I I I *** LABELS COMPLETED *** �i I 1 LABELS PRINTED II I I• 622020046 1 622020047 622020048 Mcbail Co j City Of Palm Desert I Western Community Dev Ltd P 0 Box 1056 I 73510 Fred Waring Or 73373 Country Club Or Alamo , CA 94607 1 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Desert , CA 92260 I *** LABELS COMPLETED *** 3 LABELS PRINTED ;I �I 622050014 11 622050015 622050016 Valah M Kratt I, Francis A & Bernadette Hayden Hazel G Harding 1. 41617 Armanac Ct 41597 Armanac Ct 41577 Armanac Ct Palm Desert , CA 92260 6 Palm Desert , CA 92260 Palm Desert , CA 92260 _ I _ 61 22050017 226 050018� 622050020 Jean L Harris I John L & Marjory Warne I Don A & Virginia Gruver 41557 Armanac Ct 1 2917 Sw West View Cir 41516 Armanac Ct Palm Desert, CA 92260 it Lake Oswego , Or 97034 I Palm Desert, CA 92260 I 622050021 j 622050022 622050023 Joseph J & Rose Angrisani II Robert M & Suzette Neiman Harry E & Claire Evans 41536 Armanac Ct 1' 17503 Rancho Or 4614 Bay Shore Or No 82 Palm Desert , CA 92260 j; Encino , CA 91316 Sturgeon Bay , Wi 54235 li 622050024 622050025 622050026 Jaroslua & Olga Sarapuk Dennis A & Judith Alekel James F & Raymond Block 2263 Sloan Or j 1840 Las Canas Ln I 1927 Glencoe Way Laverne , CA 91750 I' Fullerton , CA 92633 Glendale , CA 91209 622050027 1�622050028 li 622050029 Charles B & Blanche Farinella j William L & Xandra Pierce Doris Watt 41635 Navarre Ct 1 5844 112th P1 Ne j'i 41595 Navarre Ct Palm Desert, CA 92260 Kirkland , Wa 98033 i Palm Desert, CA 92260 6220SO030 �r 622050031 622050032 Jack R & Carlene Strobel William J & Angela Kennedy Orville E & Celene Howland 3130 Marna Ave II 41555 Navarre Ct 5558 Bayshore Walk Long Bch , CA 90808 Palm Desert , CA 92260 Long Beach CA 90803 622050033 622050034 622060035 Joseph N & Suzanne Cicchini John D & Karen Jacobson Edward & Iris Bridgeman 41515 Navarre Ct 41514 Navarre Ct 623 Indian Wells Ln Palm Desert, CA 92260 11 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Thousand Oaks , CA 91320 622050036 11 622050037 622050038 Diana L Wright Robert E Mcdermott j Ivan & Stacey Lane 44554 Navarre Ct 41594 Navarre Ct J 1085 Carolyn Way Palm Desert CA 92260 Palm Desert, CA 92260 ,1 Beverly Hills , CA 90210 622050039 1622050040 1 622050041 Ellen S & Theodore Stein 11 Deanna Taylor I Josephine M Beal 7334 Topanga Canyon No 203 11 73740 Calle Bisque 73750 Calle Bisque i Canoga Park . CA 91303 jl Palm Desert , CA 92260 JJ Palm Desert, CA 92260 Jlf 6220SO042 622050043 �J 622050044 Marian E Pearson David E Tellem I Don K & Donna Biss 73760 Calle Bisque 467 Denslow Ave 1 73780 Calle Bisque Palm Desert , CA 92260 1 Los Angeles , CA 90049 �I Palm Desert , CA 92260 622050045 Nanette M Circo �I 73790 Calle Bisque Palm Desert , CA 92260 f 1 www LABELS COMPLETED 31 LABELS PRINTED 622050068 Casa Blanca Owners Assn 11500 W Olympic Pl 4 Los Angeles , CA 90064 ------------ I *** LABELS COMPLETED *** i 1 LABELS PRINTED I i 622051001 622051003 6220SIO04 James L & Dolores Moroni i Harry & Carolyn Lesseos Frederick P & Rochelle Schwartz 73800 Calle Bisque 6 1405 Chestnut Ave 7 Burmington Or Palm Desert, CA 92260 Manhattan Beach CA 90266 Manalapan , Ni 07726 - --- --- - - -- 622051007 622051008 Robert 0G5Miller Nathan Karsh Daniel J Barnes 6379 Clark Ave P 0 Box 82656 41613 Aventine Ct Dublin , CA 94566 1 San Diego , CA 92138 Palm Desert, CA 92260 I I 1 622051010 622051011 622051012 Gaza Komonyi I Paul J & Ruthe Meltzner Lorraine E Nordblom P 0 Box 1992 2513 Angelcrest Or 1210 Jennings Cove Rd Palm Springs , CA 92263 Hacienda Heights , CA 91745 Mound , Mn 55364 622051613 622051014 �; 622051015 Leon & Charlotte Cherniack I Fay Helper Frank & ' Leonore Mchenry 5707 Natick Ave 27938 'Ridgebrook Ct Ia 13050 Destino Ln Van Nuys , CA 91411 �� Rancho Palos Verdes , CA 90274 P Cerritos , CA 90701 � -- --- --- ---- - 1 — - -- -- -------- Imo— - � � �- - 622051016 622051017 622051020 Isaac & Rachel Kapuano 1' Isaac & Rachel Kapuano I Bernard H & Hilda Paul 4758g La Villa Marina 13245d Fiji Way 41631 Colada Ct Marina Del Rey , CA 90292 i Marina Del Rey , CA 90202 Palm Desert , CA 92260 \' J I I ` fi22051021 - -` -- I 622051022--- �f- 622051023 Michael & Deborah Stikich Suzanne Hoffman ! David L & Geraldine Ankeny 3225 Fletcher Or 41591 Colada Ct ( 10058 Lesterford Ave Los Angeles , CA 90065 Palm Desert CA 92260 �, . Downey , CA 90240 622051024 �i 622051025 622051026 Jack H & Juleen Gerhardt it J P Gallo I, Family Fishbein 41551 Colada Ct I 41531 Colada Ct {F� 4814 Rosa Rd Palm Desert, CA 92260 ill Palm Desert, CA 92260 {( Woodland Hills . CA 91364 622051027 �II 622051029 ( 622051030 Frank & Therese Singer i Swoosie Kurtz i. Jeanette J Lucas 23520 Berdon 14404 Placidia Ave 41570 Colada Ct Woodland Hills , CA 91367 III Toluca Lake , CA 91602 Palm Desert , CA 92260 622051031 11 622051032 1 Carlson Family Partnership II Alvin L & Lila Mohr 4955 Ne 85th St 12649 Cobblestone Ct Seattle , Wa 98115 Fargo , Nd 58103 I I I I IV *** LABELS COMPLETED 26 LABELS PRINTED I1 IL f 622051063 622051062 I{ ' 1 George L & Carolyn Lundberg I Gilbert A Moe 2047 Port Whitby 141743 Aventine Ct Newport Bch , CA 92660 j Palm Desert, CA 92260 I r - I ** LABELS COMPLETED *** 2 LABELS PRINTED ; I 622051068 Casa Blanca Owners Assn 11500 W Olympic PI 4 I Los Angeles , CA 90064 i I� *** LABELS COMPLETED *** I I I 1 LABELS PRINTED j, I' E I� I 624021025 1' 624021026 1 6�027 Rosa W & Lisa Morgan j Robert T Williams j Keith N & Mary Tuttle 4537 Drexel Blv Ii 13 Acapulco Or I1 P 0 Box 1229 Chicago , Il 60653 Palm Desert. CA 92260 ' i Rancho Santa Fe , CA 92067 f 624021028 624021029 1 624021030 Robert B Thompson 1' Robert A & Denise Ogle 11 Robert B & Frieda Thornton 534 21st PI 20 Acapulco Or 2708 Patti Ln Santa Monica , CA 90402 Palm Desert , CA 92260 Rogers , Ar 72756 I' 624021031 1624021032 624021033 David B & Eileen Shaw Bradley G & Lorraine Reaume Harold J & Gloria Markowitz 24 Acapulco Or j 810 S Michigan Blv 73091 Country Club No A5-2 Palm Desert, CA 92260 it Pasadena , CA 91107 Palm_Desert, CA 92260 i p, I 624021034 11i I Tommy L & Rose Reed li 834 E Davidson Ct Brea , CA 92621 q 7... -L—A-BELS COMPLETED *** 10 LABELS PRINTED I I I I' 624021039 624021040 624021041 Don & Marilyn Lynch Eugene N & Marlene Pollack Robert W & Sarah Hadeler 3900 The Strand j 7 La Paz Ln 3275 Hutton Or Manhattan Bch , CA 90266 1 Palm Desert. CA 92260 Beverly Hills , CA 90210 1 624021042 1' 624021043 !j 624021044 John M & Marion Shea it Philip 0 & Pamela Wallberg 1 Huckthin Inc ` 260 Newport Center Or 1'' 13 La Paz Ln Po Box 9959 Newport Bch , CA 92660 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Marina Del Rey CA 90296 f --�— `- -. --- --- � --- -� Lam_ ---�- -- - -�-- - - — — 624021045 624021046 I� 624021047 Stephanie Burns Ward J & Lois Thomas Western Federal Svgs & Loan Ass P 0 Box 667 30870 Kirk Ln I' P 0 Box 9959 Corona Del Mar . CA 92625 Franklin , Mi A8025 Marina Del Rey , CA 90295 II I j 624021048 Henry M Duque 26074 Mulberry Ln Los Altos Hills , CA 94022 I *** LABELS COMPLETED *** 10 LABELS PRINTED i ------- �� Cm - • - opW®r,D RECEIVED oT 06 1989 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CITY OF PALM DESERT Draft PALM DESERT TRACT 24632 Prepared by: Austin-Foust Associates 1450 N. Tustin Avenue, Suite 108 Santa Ana, California 92701 October 4, 1989 ®�AUSTIN-FOUST ASSOCIATES, INC. TRAFFIC ENGINEERING AND TRANSPORTATION PLANNING 1450 NORTH TUSTIN AVENUE SUITE 108 • SANTA ANA CALIFORNIA 92701 TELEPHONE (714) 667-0496 FAX (714) 667-7952 October 4, 1989 Lundin Development Co. 23501 Park Sorrento, Suite 207 Calabasas, CA 91302 ATTENTION: Mr. Herb Lundin SUBJECT: PALM DESERT TRACT 24632 Dear Mr. Lundin: I. INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of a traffic analysis performed for the proposed residential development to be located in the southwest corner of the Portola Avenue and Country Club Drive intersection in the City of Palm Desert. PROTECT DESCRIPTION Figure 1-1 illustrates the location of the project site. The proposed project is a 75.7 acre residential development consisting of 169 single family residences and 220 rental units, which will be built in six phases. The project site plan is shown in Figure 1-2. ANALYSIS SCOPE The traffic analysis examines the impacts of adding project-generated traffic to the existing traffic on the surrounding arterial network. Consistent with the format used for environmental impact reports, the traffic analysis material presented here is set out as follows: I-1 +<' t FRANK SINATIIIA DR 1I•--I^ ---- I -a wtf,I' AU i„,= _ _I --F-- --T45 f • 7 W3 _ 4 I E / U M WY___N 1 Low r K •' C1M I 1 i oa t14 c'.`'.V'* .E i.jwK FLATS DE: S.tNit WSA / ft c. .. (i y• s�� P 4..7 OOtlfF b' COIMFRY / I I i aRms if WY F WAWOWFR I - y tom.f� co4Yrsrf I I 1'•. WMICAL AAWINAtxc PROJECT i x I ror.o.'ol trutitispenits� I o ' ��:� � f �i.� a�, T r��. LOCATION IM Ct ■Y i�� M EwE M 1 I t'n 1 i it i .. OFtE1T *a. :; ot. -' - - - - - - --- � -- -- - - .A ! IF•�-_'t*�� �� `% '%F'``.ti'i��'".i�°s'bxylpn•a-•:t� 'sfd�'[. -.� AE;I .e:$1q N'�:;.. :�";¢:� .'/": N ---- IE ,1 � 1 nw,� ue�al :::E� �y .„�L� •t� ai •rl � �-.. ..; s..nhd;•�s . E',• •ELiALUNOi► 0 .lti''. 'e •P'.+.:r F%d.lE0r. . F fi :.:. .. .:... . 17 ..::.:..... .....:: ...........::.....:.:.:. T �I a '�J 9Yi• 4'� '•�4 SAj �'�:� tf. .. AILS I I +L.S a 1.I u aau a}+• 4� ?f*TR '�k� �I w i +��.+Q a'dT. pv. ;,yam r •I:E rooluw ,u.,p i E SS + Fv#+^ 1f"�'� ��4 1 J��Y 7( 1 qua �^ on i': C• C �,j+, F:..:MW�41. ; tilt y .1r' � --111 mvm-- VY--.D■IQ- �..'.. .:.'Ai , ."Ju.. Poo :. e� vin sFux lM ;v::x.t,t_: ... '^ '4=.:,:. ,�all^<•.'... " L - -.- - _ - -_ -- _--_- - J"_-1 urtcY i tH �- •,� p �� ..,::.. - sl I I,arEo F I In w—f''OQnWTl 1 x B a wetme w � 11 UKEtrsrw p j • rrr+r , + Ai� L 1 711 ."Nam {PI•[ 4 oT< /�. r 4 I `S ` - 1' �. �1'�FGEI�i�CItlC I tt +: : ..r ��•j Figure I-1 PROJECT LOCATION 401AYSTIN-FOYST ASSOCIATES, INC. �, it ...,..:.;' '�d ll� �♦—COUNjRY L � �D.P -7E_ i .� _.—_— �. I _Q. •r .�""�°t: .1�:' •-�/ 1 \ 1 j � .�jy�;;y.J� I .��• ••C tdl I IL 5s_:�el d1l, ,� R r•\ ` \, ' �� r 1 � C) f� 'r Y� `i•�+`a- bt �l \�,��1 `1,\"' ��t Z-M _ � i T�Le � �s �i.i \ �` �' � ^+C ��i s',��L ;, r-1 �''-�:�,�;, ��`'.-�=`\J _'�� r�v�:��\. �aci•) '� ��i n y�� \ ' 1.. `I`;\4`' .( . _. ar•I~ ... � - Y_ )r�-'lJi,. - iri�'�y ..» I. I 1 < », a� �,a a �Y\ .. ♦ ��\' -r'f � 'Y /� J1 �''r.. .i ``�• �^ �l ,}�-{ \` vim: p g el I -� ` .�, ":� � `_` �- 'l�cll T � � "v,F,,� /„`�°�fS_✓e� 'I 'K '1�(F� 4� rL\�l`f,� _ -� I.li , � �l. .r\ C� .Yr'� ;� �`! �C t� �\t'= \.. `• r ,> Ij ` C r SJ ,Icy I 1 � � �,� ��\ram? ���i ») �t✓1 j-mot' - yl II / 1 • ' ::) , Mr.'wl V.^..r'• »r f -�, "'_`i�4�: ,� ' r.:...rr `�rw.w, .i r . . \. -.. ... .. .. ..... �•y.i Figure I-2 PROJECT SITE PLAN . 9 092AUSTIN-FOUST ASSOCIATES, INC. Chapter H - Project Setting Chapter III - Project Impacts Chapter IV - Potential Mitigation Measures Detailed analysis results are also contained at the end of the report as technical appendices and referenced in the text where appropriate. DEFINMONS Certain terms used throughout this report are defined below to clarify their intended meaning: Background Traffic - Estimated traffic volumes on the arterial system before the addition of project-generated traffic. ADT - Average daily traffic. VPD - Vehicles per day. This has the same meaning as ADT, but is generally used in a trip generation context rather than in reference to a highway volume at some selected location. VPH - Vehicles per hour. ICU - Intersection capacity utilization factor measuring the volume-to-capacity ratio for an intersection. V/C - Volume-to-capacity ratio for a section of arterial. REFERENCES 1. "Trip Generation: An Infomational Report," (4th Edition), Institute of Transportati Engineers. I-4 H. PROJECT SETTING This chapter describes the project site in relation to the local transportation setting. Existing traffic volumes are summarized for use in the impact analysis section. SURROUNDING HIGHWAY NETWORK Access to the project is provided via Country Club Drive and Portola Avenue. Country Club Drive extends from Highway 111 to the west in Rancho Mirage to Washington Street to the east, providing access to the I-10 Freeway. Portola Avenue connects to Highway 111 to the south and accesses the I-10 Freeway to the north via Country Club Drive and Monterey Avenue, or via Frank Sinatra Drive or Gerald Ford Drive to Monterey Avenue. EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES Existing peak hour traffic volumes were measured at the intersection of Portola Avenue and Country Club Drive. These volumes are illustrated in Figure H-1. II-1 Q 6s 0 _ F� i t9i: co -t 30 N d � 542 -az IS J l Iy, 1 1 2 Country Club Dr. 1 I J 28 -�' 63k -.519 � 87 �, N-� -t- o AM 621 Q 0 0 CD CD � -zt o — 147 Country Club Dr. 72 t 634 -0- 163 —:�, 'zt -zt00 0� 7t � PM Figure II-1 EXISTING PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES ®�AUSTIN-FOUST ASSOCIATES, INC. II-2 III. PROJECT IMPACTS TRIP GENERATION As discussed in Chapter 1, the project consists of 169 single family residences (Phases 1- 5), and a 220 unit multi-family residential complex (Phase 6). Project trip generation for the proposed project is shown in Table III-1. Project trip distribution is illustrated in Figure III-1. TABLE III-1 PROJECT TRIP GENERATION ---AM PEAK HOUR--- ---PM PEAK HOUR--- LAND USE SIZE IB OB TOTAL In OB TOTAL ADT Single-Family Residence Phase 1 32 DU - Trips/ISF 0.20 0.55 0.75 0.63 0.37 1.00 10.06 Trip Generation 6 18 24 20 12 32 322 Phase 2 32 DU TripaMF 0.20 055 0.75 0.63 0.37 1.00 10.06 Trip Generation 6 18 74 20 12 32 322 Phase 3 35 DU TripaMF 0.20 055 0.75 0.63 0.37 1.00 10.06 Trip Generation 7 19 26 22 13 35 352 Phase 4 35 DU TripsMF 0.20 0.55 0.75 0.63 0.37 1.00 10.06 Trip Generation 7 19 26 22 13 35 352 Phase 5 35 DU TripsMF 0.20 055 0.75 0.63 0.37 1.00 10.06 Trip Generation 7 19 26 22 13 35 352 Single Family Total 34 93 127 106 63 169 1,700 Multi-Family Residence 220 DU TrlpMF - 0.10 0.43 053 0.46 0.21 0.67 6.10 Trip Generation 21 96 117 100 47 147 1,342 TOTAL 55 189 244 206 110 316 3,042 III-1 nr � + m f 94/55 r4/14 COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE +4r, 3�10 f6/J1 28 104. 28/104 3/3y lr 29 7y om 5/J Ph—6 d� H 23/1 I9i137 1 tir H a H 1 PM1vee 6 N 0 O Pnase 4 O r D Pno,e s D Z Z C m Fnaae 3 PM1nse 2 Phcse I 29 I� 59ZJ )r ma , r e Figure III-1 PROJECT PEAK HOUR VOLUMES vfAUSTIN-FOUST ASSOCIATES, INC. TRAFFIC IMPACTS In assessing the capacity impacts 'resulting from the proposed project, AM and PM peak hour volumes were examined. The peak hour volume/capacity ratios for existing traffic and existing- plus-project are summarized in Table III-2. See the appendix for the Intersection Capacity Utilization calculations. TABLE 111-2 ICU SUMMARY EXISTING EXISTING + PROJECT INTERSECTION AM PEAK PM PEAK AM PEAK PM PEAK Portola Avenue @ 0.41 (A) 0.46(A) 0.43 (A) 0.48 (A) Country Club Dr. III-3 IV. POTENTIAL MITIGATION MEASURES The proposed project will generate an additional 3,042 daily trips with 244 of these occurring in the AM peak hour period and 316 trips occurring in the PM peak hour period. The traffic impact of the project is minimal on the surrounding circulation system. As a result, no additional traffic-related mitigation other than the usual roadway improvements normally conditioned with such a project are deemed necessary. IV-1 APPENDIX INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS City of: Pals Desert NIS Street: Portola Avenue E/N Street: Country Club Drive Traffic Volume Conditions: AM Peak Hour Count 9/6/89 Proposed Modification: None (Existing Conditions) Base Project Total Pk, Pk. Pk, T 8rn. Hr. Hr. Hr. Time Myst. Lanes Cap, Vol. Vol. Vol. Req'd Notes -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NL 1 1,610 132 0 132 6.18 f NT 2 3,281 140 a 140 1.88 MR 8 8 186 0 l06 0.18 SL 1 1,601 74 0 74 1.15 ST 2 3,210 193 0 193 1.87 a SR 1 1 44 1 44 8.88 EL 1 1,610 28 8 28 1.65 ET 2 3,201 519 1 519 1.19 s ER 8 0 87 8 87 0.88 NL 1 1,601 112 a 112 1.87 a NT 2 3,211 542 1 542 8.18 NR 8 1 38 8 31 1.11 ICU= 1.41 LOS= A ------------ Notes: a) Asterisk (s) indicates critical movement. b) LOS = Level Of Service. cl Base traffic volumes sources AUSTIN-FOUST ASSOCIATES, INC. AFA Project Number 271.111 Calc. Date: 09/11/89 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS City of: Palm Desert N/S Street: Portola Avenue E/N Street: Country Club Drive Traffic Volume Conditions: PM Peak Hour Count 9/5/89 Proposed Modification: None (Existing Conditions) Base Project Total Pk. Pk. Pk. % Bra. Mr. Hr. Hr. Time Mvmt. lanes Cap. Val, Vol. Vol. Req'd Notes -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NL 1 1,686 94 0 94 8.16 NT 2 3,206 144. 8 144 8.17 + NR 8 0 18 8 78 1.88 SL l 1,619 48 0 48 8.05 a ST 2 3,211 134 8 134 8.15 SR 1 0 28 8 28 1.11 EL 1 1,681 72 0 72 1.15 ET 2 3,211 634 1 634 8.25 + ER 8 8 163 8 163 8.08 IL 1 1,681 147. 0 147 0.19 } NT 2 3,281 539 0 539 6.16 NR 1 8 48 8 48 1.16 ICU. 1.46 LOS= A ------------- Notes: a) Asterisk (0 indicates critical movement. b) LOS = Level Of Service. c) Base traffic volumes source: AUSTIN-FOUST ASSOCIATES, INC. AFA Project Number 271.811 Calc. Dates 89/11/89 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS City of: Pale Desert N/S Street: Portola Avenue E/N Street: Country Club Drive Traffic Volume Conditions: AM Peak Hour Proposed Modification: Existing plus Residential Project Base Project Total Pk. Pk. Pk. T Srn, Hr. Hr. Hr. Time Mvet. Lanes Cap. Vol. Vol. Vol. Req'd Notes -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NL 1 1,681 132 9 141 8.87 + NT 2 3,210 149 4 144 9.19 NR 0 0 186 25 131 8.18 SL 1 1,618 74 8 74 8.85 ST 2 3,28B 193 2 195 1.88 + SR 8 8 44 1 45 8.11 EL 1 1,618 28 5 33 0.15 ET 2 3,218 519 3 522 0.19 + ER 8 8 87 5 92 6.68 NL 1 1,648 112 5 117 0.17 + NT 2 3,216 542 3 545 8.10 NR 0 8 30 B 38 6.18 ICU= 8.43 LOS• A ------------- Notes: a) Asterisk (+) indicates critical movement. b) LOS = Level Of Service. c) Base traffic volumes sources AUSTIN-FOUST ASSOCIATES, INC. AFA Project Number 271.BB1 Calc. Date: 09/11/89 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS City of: Pale Desert N/S Street: Portola Avenue E/N Street: Country Club Drive Traffic Volume Conditions: PM Peak Hour Proposed Modification: Existing plus Residential Project Base Project Total Pk, Pk. Pk. I Srn. Hr. Hr. Hr. Time Nvet. Lanes Cap. Val. Vol. Vol. Req'd Notes ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NL 1 1,610 94 5 99 1.16 NT 2 3,211 144 2 146 1.17 a MR 8 8 78 15 93 8.08 SL 1 1,611 41 8 48 6.85 a ST 2 3,280 134 6 148 8.15 SR 8 8 28 4 24 1.11 EL 1 1,611 72 3 75 1.15 ET 2 3,260 634 2 636 1.25 m ER 8 8 163 3 166 1.08 NL 1 1,618 147 21 IN 0.11 m NT 2 3,280 539 18 549 1.19 NR 8 8 48 8 48 1.01 ICU= 1.46 LOS= A ------------- Notes: a) Asterisk (f) indicates critical movement. b) LOS = Level Of Service. c) Base traffic volumes source: AUSTIN-FOUST ASSOCIATES, INC. AFA Project Number 271.881 Calc. Date: 19/11/99 l 77- w � g� elf cy) � /VO7 Ca Vp 1 i _ y 5G t Cqfty of Palm Desert 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260-2578 TELEPHONE(619)346-0611 FAX(619)341-7098 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NOTICE OF ACTION Date: April 18, 1996 Mr. Robert C. Vatcher V/S Associates 42-280 Beacon Hill, Suite D-3 Palm Desert, California 92211 Re: AT 24632 Revision No. 2 The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of April 16, 1996 . PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVED A ONE YEAR TIME EXTENSION FOR TT 24632 REVISION NO. 2 BY MINUTE MOTION. CARRIED 5-0. rc Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Community Development, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen ( 15) days of the date of the decision. —+✓PHILIP ELL, SECRET PALM DES RT:gbA#�t3YQG COMMISSION PD/tm cc: Coachella Valley Water District Public Works Department Building & Safety Department Fire Marshal Aaneeea Paper I V/S ASSOCIATA MENGINEERING-PLANNING-SURVEYING RECEIVED APR - 4 1996 COMMUN C """O'Y OFIS"ETP�ENT DESER Mr . Phill Drell 3 April 1996 Community . Development Director City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260-2578 Re: Tentative Tract Map no. 24632 , Revision No. 2 , ( 3-02-00 ) Request for extension of approval. Dear Mr. Drell : The above referenced Tentative Tract Map No. 24632 was initially approved by the Planning Commission on May 17 , 1994 per Resolution No. 1646 . Said approval will expire on May 17 , 1996 , unless extended. On behalf of the owner/developer, McBail Company, we respectfully request a first extension of time to the approval of said Tentative Tract Map No. 24632 by the. City Planning Commission . This request is made to allow for additional time to provide for the property development which has been tenuous to date due to adverse economic conditions for development in general . Thank you for the consideration and kindly keep us advised of this request status . Very truly yours , Robert C. Vatcher Principal ,- (as agent for McBail Company) cc : Mr. Michael Gallagher, McBail Company Cook Street Business Park,42-280 Beacon Hill,Suite D-3 Palm Desert,CA 92211,619/341-1599,Fax 619/341-1592 a Cow ®V Pam Desert 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260-2578 TELEPHONE(619)346-0611 FAX(619) 340-0574 November 17, 1993 Mr. Robert C. Vatcher V/S Associates 42-280 Beacon Hill, Suite D-3 Palm Desert, California 92211 Re: . Letter Dated November 11, 1993 Dear Mr. Vatcher: This letter is to confirm that per SB 428, TT 24632 will be given an automatic two year time extension. If you have any questions, please call . Very truly yours, } ON A. DIAZ ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER/ DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT /tm =V/S ASSOCIATES FNi GINEERING•PIANNING•SUWEYING 1. 5 1993 ,dori4MM11NI1V OF POrMENI UCPRRIME Y� 9T'OC PRIM IIERERI Community Development Director 11 November 1993 Civic Center 73-510 Fred Waring Dr'. Palm Desert, CA 92260 Re; Tentative Map Expiration Status Gentlemen: Our records indicate the following listed Tentative Maps under your jurisdiction having approval expiration dates as shown. Pursuant to S.B. 428 , signed into law by Governor Wilson and effective September 13 , 1993 , all Tentative Tract and Parcel Maps and related approvals unexpired by that date are automatically extended for a period of two years . We request your corroboration of the newly extended dates shown. Tentative Map No. Old Exriration Date New SB 428 Expiration Date TTM 24632 1 -16-94 (Ext. #2 ) 1 -16-96 We shall look forward to your early response. Very truly yours , - 21 Robert C. Vatcher Principal Cook Street Business Park 42 280 Beacon Hill,Suite D-3 Palm Desert,CA 92211,619/3411599,Fax 619/341-1592 CITY OF PALM DESERT DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT f ` MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Assistant City Manager/Director of Community Development DATE: October 26, 1993 SUBJECT: Tentative Tract Map Public Improvement Requirements Recently, representatives from McBail Co met with me concerning development of the southwest corn r-of-Portola Avenue and Country Club Drive. They wish to proceed with a tentative map for the area bordered by Portola Avenue, Country Club Drive, Casablanca Development and San Tropez Villas . They desire to subdivide the area in question but are concerned with the relationship of the required public improvements and their ability to finance those improvements with the limitations placed on their ability to finance phases of their, project. This is not unique to their project and we may wish to refer this issue to the EDAC. The problem is one, in this specific case, of constructing all street improvements abutting the project (Country Club Drive and Portola Avenue) when a small portion of the project is under development (see attached map) . The question being raised is can they be permitted to develop their public improvements to coincide with their housing construction. The pros and cons are somewhat obvious, the question is do we stop the question here or move it forward. i �/IcN A. 1 4' ASSISTANT CITY NAGER, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT/PLANNING /tm I 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260.2578 TELEPHONE(619)346-0611 FAX(619)340-0574 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NOTICE OF ACTION Date: December 17 , 1992 Mr. Robert C . Vatcher V/S Associates 42-280 Beacon Hill , Suite D-3 Palm Desert, California 92260 Re: V/T 24632 The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of December 15 , 1992 . PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVED A ONE-YEAR TIME EXTENSION FOR TT 24632 BY MINUTE MOTION. CARRIED 5-0. Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Community Development, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen ( 15) days of the date of the decision. RAMON A. DI AZ , S C -ARY PALM DESERT PLANNI dd COMMISSION RAD/tm cc : Coachella Valley Water District Public Works Department Building & Safety Department Fire Marshal 4 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY - DECEMBER 15, 1992 7 :00 P.M. - CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBER 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE I . CALL TO ORDER Chairman Spiegel called the meeting to order at 7 : 00 p.m. II . PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Commissioner Whitlock led in the pledge of allegiance. III . ROLL CALL Members Present: Bob Spiegel, Chairman Diane Cox Sabby Jonathan Randy White Carol Whitlock Members Absent: None Staff Present : Ray Diaz Joe Gaugush Bob Hargreaves Tonya Monroe Jeff Winklepleck IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES : Consideration of the December 1, 1992 meeting minutes . Action: Moved by Commissioner Whitlock, seconded by Commissioner White, approving the December 1, 1992 meeting minutes as submitted. Carried 5-0. V. SUMMARY OF COUNCIL ACTION Mr. Diaz summarized pertinent December 3, 1992 city council actions . VI . CONSENT CALENDAR Case No. TT 24632 - ROBERT C. VATCHER, Applicant Request for approval of a one year time extension for a tentative tract map to subdivide 77 . 8 gross acres into 176 lj single family lots, 2 additional lots set aside for 213 future apartment units and a lot for the existing CVWD well site; the whole site is located at the �. southwest corner of Country Club Drive ^r MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION DECEMBER 15 , 1992 and Portola Avenue. The map was originally approved on January 16 , 1990 . Action: Moved by Commissioner Whitlock, seconded by Commissioner Jonathan, approving the consent calendar by minute motion. Carried 5-0 . VII . PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Continued Case No. TT 27524 - WILSHIRE WEST, INC. , Applicant Request for approval of a tentative tract map subdividing 17 . 64 acres of PR 17 . 5 zoned land located on the south side of Hovley Lane, 1930 feet east of Portola Avenue into 82 single family lots having minimum lot sizes of 7200 square feet and minimum widths of 60 feet. Mr. Diaz explained that a continuance to the meeting of January 19, 1993 was requested. He explained that he was hesitant because of a possible problem with the permit streamlining act in terms of having to make a decision; however, the applicants have requested the continuance. He said that the permit streamlining act was an act passed by the state legislature six or seven years ago to speed up the development process . The applicant requested the continuances and they were present; also, even if the permit streamlining act were to approve this development, 82 single family residences would be approved versus the previously approved 200 apartments . Mr. Diaz did not see a problem with the lower density. He recommended a continuance to January 19 , 1993, stating for the record that the request was made by the applicant. Commissioner Jonathan asked why this item had been continued so many times; Mr. Diaz said the applicant was present and could address that issue. Chairman Spiegel opened the public testimony and asked the applicant to address the commission. MR. TOM HABERCORN, Wilshire West/West Side Bank, said that he was requesting the continuance because they had 2 _ RECEIVE® VAS ASS0C)nS DEC 0 4 1992 VWIMWENGINEERING PIANNING•SURVEYING MHUY1IY DEYELOPMEMt OEPUTMEW ERY 0,PALM aj,, 1 December 1992 Community Development Civic Center 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert , CA 9226U Re : Tentative Tract Map No . 24632 , Approval by Planning Commission Resolution No . 1417 , .January 16 , 1990 . One year extension approval by minute motion , .January 7 , 1992 . (JN 03-02-00) Gentlemen - The first one year extension approval for the above referenced Tentative Map will expire .January 16 , 1993 . On behalf of the land owner we respectfully request an additional year's extension of time to said approval . Thank: you . Very truly yours , . cotrt Vatc�ier - -- Principal cc : Mr . Michael Gallagher McBail Co . Cook Street Business Park,42 280 Beacon Hill,Suite D-3 Palm Desert,CA 92260,619/341 1599,Fax 619/341-1592 1 t - 5 �oMv 0 FdM N)Q@n 73.510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260-2578 1 TELEPHONE(619)346-0611 FAX(619)340-0574 1, i a' PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING t, NOTICE OF ACTION i Date: January 9, 1992 Mr. Robert Vatcher V/S Associates 42-280 Beacon Hill, Suite D-3 Palm Desert, California 92260 ' Re: A 24632 The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of January. 7, 1992. PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVED A ONE YEAR TIME EXTENSION FOR TT 24632 BY MINUTE MOTION. CARRIED 5-0. i i 'i Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director { of Community Development, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen ( 15 ) days of the date of the decision. R M N A. DIAZ, C ARY PALM DESERT PLANNICOMMISSION I RAD/tm cc: Coachella Valley Water District { Public Works Department Building & Safety Department Fire Marshal I 1 ; i MINUTES 1 ' PALM L..SERT PLANNING COMMISSION METING TUESDAY - JANUARY 7, 1992 7:00 P.M. - CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBER 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE I. CALL TO ORDER Chairperson Whitlock called the meeting to order at 7:03 p.m. II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Commissioner Downs led in the pledge of allegiance. III. ROLL CALL Members Present: Carol Whitlock, Chairperson Bob Downs Sabby Jonathan Jim Richards Bob Spiegel Members Absent: None Staff Present: Ray Diaz Steve Smith Kandy Allen Joe Gaugush Phil Drell Tonya Monroe Jeff Winklepleck IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Consideration of the December 17, 1991 meeting minutes. Action• Moved by Commissioner Downs, seconded by Commissioner Richards, approving the December 17, 1991 meeting minutes as submitted. V. SUMMARY OF COUNCIL ACTION Chairperson Whitlock noted that there had not been a council meeting since the last planning commission meeting. VI. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Vase No. TT 24632 - LUNDIN DEVELOPMENT CO. , Applicant Request for approval of a first one year time extension for a tentative tract map to subdivide 77.8 gross acres into 176 single family lots, 2 additional lots set aside for 213 future apartment units and MINUTES > PALM DESERT PLANNING . JMMISSION JANUARY 7, 1992 a lot for the existing CVWD well site, the whole site located at the southwest corner of Country Club Drive and Portola Avenue. B. Case No. PM 25673 - PERRY ASHBY, Applicant Request for approval of a first one year time extension for a parcel map and variance subdividing into two lots the existing R-1 13, 000 zoned 21, 780 square foot lot located on the east side of Ramona Way, 220 feet north of Alessandro. Upon questioning by Commissioner Spiegel, commission and staff provided clarification regarding the planning commission' s policy for approval time extension requests. Action: Moved by Commissioner Downs, seconded by Commissioner Jonathan, approving the consent calendar by minute motion. Carried 5-0. VII. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Continued Case No. CUP 91-16 - BIGALOW'S, Applicant Request for approval of a conditional use permit to allow the addition of 28 seats to an existing take-out restaurant at 73- 671 Highway 111. Mr. Winklepleck explained that for the last two weeks staff had been in contact with the applicant, who had come in with a revised request asking for 14 seats instead of 28, which would reduce the parking deficiency to only one space. Staff felt this was acceptable and recommended approval of the amended request. Upon questioning by Commissioner Jonathan, Mr. Winklepleck clarified that the applicant was allowed eight seats without being considered a restaurant or requiring a conditional use permit; with an additional six seats ( 14 total ) , there would be a one parking space deficiency. Chairperson Whitlock noted that the original recommendation was for denial and that had been reversed with the reduction in seating. Mr. Winklepleck concurred. 2 e` _ _V/S ASSOCIATES �� ��,�,JW ENGINEERING•PIANNING•SL 9 NTYING �i DEC 2 3 7991 VDMMUNPY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF PALM DESERT 19 December 1991 Community Development Civic Center 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 Re: Tentative Tract Map No. 24632 , Approval by Planning Commission Resolution No. 1417 , January 16, 1990 . (JN 03-02-00) Gentlemen: The initial two year approval period for the above referenced Tentative Map will expire January 16, 1992 . On behalf of the land owner we respectfully request an additional year's extension of time to said approval . Thank you. Very truly yours , 60 Ro ert C. Vatcher P incipal cc: Mr. Michael Gallagher McBail Co. Cook Street Business Park,42-280 Beacon Hill,Suite D3 Palm Desert,CA 92260,619/341 1599,Fax 619/341 1592 =V/S ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING•PIANNING•SURVEYINGWAV Mr. Ramon Diaz July 3, 1990 Director of Community Development Civic Center 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert , Ca . 92260 Re: Tentative Tract No. 24632 (JN 29-01-00) Dear Mr . Diaz : Enclosed is a sketch overlay for a portion of Tentative Tract Map 24632 showing a proposed extension of Goya Court (Lot 1) into the adjacent portion of Phase 5 multi-family area. The affected area would become all single family residential lots . With this proposal the land use tabulation would be as follows : Single Family detached residential lots from 176 to 184 Multi-family residential units maximum from 205 to 213 Total residential remains at 389 We respectfully solicit an opinion as to the permissibility of the proposed minor alteration to the approved Tentative Map and will look forward to response at the earliest possible convenience. Should there be any further questions please contact us . Very truly yours , — L�k — Ro ert C. Vatcher Principal RCV/pd. cc : Crescent Communities Ltd. , Cheryl Covey McBail Company, Michael Gallagher Cook Street Business Park,42-280 Beacon Hill,Suite D-3 Palm Desert,CA 92260,619/341-1599,Fax 619/341-1592 - _ 1 COUNTRY CLUB-4 V-2 -'C7LOT 77 *-1z/W 9v Ill, '9 I. -7 V v4 'I ?.30 A A Al QO W 111 0 tn tf 0 225 38 ,'\'Uj 6 la A, 14 CO tv .0 Is& is" '140 n Jill tA 22 o 7 q L.. 21 Ok 14 1z'= 300 -13 9 142 0 \A -174 'b '0 7 4; y . SS A% 164- 7\ I To" v C2/ TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO . 24632 Proposed extension of Goya Court (Lot 1) with single family J J detached residential lots in lieu of apartments in portion-of-Phase 5 . ------------------------ -- -------- ro VIS Associates 07-03-90 IR J.L t: Engineering Planning - Surveying Cook Street Business Park 42-290 Beacon Hill , Suite D-1 Q"�a Zvi 11 Q ovd Palm Desert, CA 92260 (619Y 341-1599 wi 26 n90 (619) 341-1592 Fax 00?4111TINITY DEVELOPMUff DEPANIMEN11 CITY OF PALM DESERT January 23, 1990 City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Haring Drive Palm Desert, CA 9226o Attn: Mr. Ramon A. Diaz, Secretary Palm Desert Planning Commission Re: TentativenT-ve 24632 Kevi5ion #1 ) ..... ........... Dear Mr. Diaz . We are in receipt of the notification of approval of the above referenced and resolution No. 1417. We wish to thank you and your staff for the assistance and expedient manner in this application. Your efforts are sincerely appreciated . A point of clarification is required in the conditions of approval , Department of Community Development/Planning, Item No. 2 in that the approval of the subject Tentative Map is valid for a period of two years pursuant to section 66452. 6 of the Subdivision Map Act , copy enclosed for your reference.. Very truly yours, Robei-ly C. Vatcher Principal cci Lundin Development Co. Watt Industries, Palm Springs, Inc. proved by the advisory agency, and it shall be the duty of the clerk of the leg- islative body to certify or state that approval, or if the advisory agency is one which is not authorized by local ordinance to approve, conditionally ap- prove, or disapprove the tentative map, the advisory agency shall submit its report to the legislative body as if no appeal had been taken. - If the legislative body fails to act upon an appeal within the time limit specified in this chapter, the tentative map, insofar as it complies with ap- plicable requirements of this division and local ordinance, shall be deemed to be approved or conditionally approved as last approved or conditionally ap- proved, and it shall be the duty of the clerk of the legislative body to certify or state that approval. . (d) Any interested person, adversely affected by a decision of the advisory agency or appeal board may file a complaint with the governing body concerning any decision of the advisory agency or appeal board. The complaint shall be filed with the clerk of the governing body within 10 days after the action of the advisory agency or appeal board which is the subject of the complaint. Upon the filing of the complaint, the governing body shall set the matter for hearing. The hearing shall be held within 30 days after the filing of the complaint. The hearing may be a public hearing for which notice shall be given in the time and manner provided. Upon conclusion of the hearing, the governing body shall, within seven days, declare its findings based upon the testimony and documents produced before it or before the advisory board or the appeal board. It may sustain, modify, reject, or overrule any recommendations or rulings of the advisory board or the appeal board and may make any findings which are not inconsis- tent with the provisions of this chapter or local ordinance adopted pursuant to this chapter. (a) Notice of each hearing provided for in this section shall be sent by United States mail to each tenant of the subject property, in the case of a j conversion of residential real property to a condominium project, community apartment project, or stock cooperative project, at least three days prior to the hearing. The notice requirement of this subdivision shall be deemed sat- isfied if the notice complies with the legal requirements for service by mail. Pursuant to Section 66451.2, fees may be collected from the subdivider or from persons appealing or filing a complaint for expenses incurred under this section. (Amended, Chapter 1408, Statutes of 19881 I 66452.6. Term of tentative map approvals; effect of morato- riums and lawsuits upon approval time limits; ex- - tensions of time (a) An approved or conditionally approved tentative map shall expire 24 months after its approval or conditional approv�I, or after any additional period of time as may be prescribed by local ordinance, not to exceed an addi- tional 12 months. However, if the subdivider is subject to a requirement of one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) or more 10 construct, improve, or finance the construction or improvement of public improvements outside the boundaries of the tentative map, each filing of a final map authorized by Sec- j tion 66456.1 shall extend the expiration of the approved or conditionally approved tentative map by 36 months from the date of its expiration, as provided in this section, or the date of the previously filed final map, whichever is later. The extensions shall not extend the tentative map more than 10 years from its approval or conditional approval. However, a tenta- tive map on property subject to a development agreement authorized by Ar- ` 35 ticle 2.5 (commencing with Section 65864) of Chapter 4 of Division 1 may subdivider's application for an extension, the subdivider may appeal to the be extended for the period of time provided for in the agreement, but not be- legislative body within 15 days after the advisory agency has denied the ex- yond the duration of the agreement. The number of phased final maps which tension. . may be filed shall be determined by the advisory agency at the time of the (f) For purposes of this section, a development moratorium includes a approval or conditional approval of the tentative map. water or sewer moratorium, or a water and sewer moratorium, as well as "Public improvements," as used in this subdivision, include traffic other actions of public agencies which regulate land use, development, or the controls, streets, roads, highways, freeways, bridges, overcrossings, street provision of services to the land, other than the public agency with the Interchanges, flood control or storm drain facilities, sewer facilities, water authority to approve or conditionally approve the tentative map, which facilities, and lighting facilities. thereafter prevents, prohibits, or delays the approval of a final or parcel (b) (1) The period of time specified in subdivision (a) shall not map. A development moratorium shall also be deemed to exist for purposes of include any period of time during which a development moratorium, imposed this section for any period of time during which a condition imposed by the after approval of the tentative map, is in existence. However, the length of city or county could not be satisfied because of either of the following: the moratorium shall not exceed five years. ( 1 ) The condition was one which, by its nature, necessitated action by (2) The length of time specified in paragraph (1) shall be extended for the city or county, and the city or county either did not take the necessary up to three years, but in no event beyond January 1, 1992, during the action or by its own action or inaction was prevented or delayed in taking the pendency of any lawsuit in which the subdivider asserts, and the local agency necessary action prior to expiration of the tentative map. which approved or conditionally approved the tentative map denies, the (2) The condition necessitates acquisition of real property or a existence or application of a development moratorium to the tentative map. interest in real property from a public agency, other than the city or county (3) Once a development moratorium is terminated, the map shall be that approved or conditionally approved the tentative map, and that other valid for the same period of time as was left to run on the map at the time that public agency fails or refuses to convey the property interest necessary to the moratorium was imposed. However, if the remaining time is less than satisfy the condition. However, nothing in this subdivision shall be construed 120 days, the map shall be valid for 120 days following the termination of to require any public agency to convey any interest in real property owned by the moratorium. it. A development moratorium specified in this paragraph shall be deemed to (c) The period of time specified in subdivision (a), including any ex- have been imposed either on the date of approval or conditional approval of tension thereof granted pursuant to subdivision (a), shall not include the the tentative map, if evidence was included in the public record that the period of time during which a lawsuit involving the approval or conditional public agency which owns or controls the real property or any interest approval of the tentative map is or was pending in a court of competent ju- therein may refuse to convey that property or interest, or on the date that the risdiction, if the stay of the time period is approved by the local agency pur- public agency which owns or controls the real property or any interest suant to this section. After service of the initial petition or complaint in the therein receives an offer by the subdivider to purchase that property or lawsuit upon the local agency, the subdivider may apply to the local agency interest for fair market value, whichever is later. A development for a stay pursuant to the local agency's adopted procedures. Within 40 days moratorium specified in this paragraph shall extend the tentative map up to after receiving the application, the local agency shall either stay the time the maximum period as set forth in subdivision (b), but not later than period for up to five years or deny the requested stay. The local agency may, January 1, 1992, so long as the public agency which owns or controls the by ordinance, establish procedures for reviewing the request, including, but real property or any interest therein fails or refuses to convey the not limited to, notice and hearing requirements, appeal procedures, and other necessary property interest, regardless of the reason for the failure or administrative requirements. refusal, except that the development moratorium shall be deemed to (d) The expiration of the approved or conditionally approved tentative terminate 60 days, after the public agency has officially made, ar map shall terminate all proceedings and no final map or parcel map of all or communicated to the subdivider, a written offer or commitment binding c any portion of the real property Included within the tentative map shall be the agency to convey the necessary property interest for a fair market value, filed with the legislative body without first processing a new tentative map. paid in a reasonable time and manner. 9 Y Once a timely filing Is made, subsequent actions of the local agency, including, (g) The rights conferred by a vesting tentative map as provided by but not limited to, processing, approving, and recording, may lawfully occur Chapter 4.5 (commencing with Section 66498.1) shall last for an initial after the date of expiration of the tentative map.. Delivery to the county sur- time period, as provided by ordinance, but shall not be less than one year or veyor or city engineer shall be deemed a timely filing for purposes of this more than two years beyond the recording of the final map. Where several section. final maps are recorded on various phases of a project covered by a single p (a) Upon application of the subdivider filed prior to the expiration of vesting tentative map, the one year initial time period shall begin for each the approved or conditionally approved tentative map, the time at which the phase when the final map for that phase is recorded. map expires may be extended by the legislative body or by an advisory agency The initial time period shall be automatically extended by any time used authorized to approve or conditionally approve tentative maps for a period or by the local agency for processing a complete application for a grading permit periods not exceeding a total of three years. Prior to the expiration of an or for design or architectural review, if the time used by the local agency to approved or conditionally approved tentative map, upon an application by the process the application exceeds 30 days, from the date that a complete appli- subdivider to extend that map, the map shall automatically be extended for 60 cation is filed. At any time prior to the expiration of the initial time period days or until the application for the extension is approved, conditionally ap- provided by this section, the subdivider may apply for a one-year extension. proved, or denied, whichever occurs first. If the advisory agency denies a 36 37 1 If the extension is denied by an advisory agency, the subdivider may appeal that denial to the legislative body within 15 days. (h) If the subdivider submits a complete application for a building permit during the periods of time specified in subdivision (g), the rights conferred by Chapter 4.5 (commencing with Section 66498.1) shall con- tinue until the expiration of that permit, or any extension of that permit granted by the local agency. [Amended, Chapter 1330, Statutes of 1988[ 66452.7. Time extensions due to review by Office of Intergov. ernmental Management The governing body, when there is no advisory agency or the advisory agency is required by Section 66455.5 to submit the tentative map to the Of- fice of Intergovernmental Management, may extend the time permitted for action on such map if it is required to allow consideration of the evaluation received from the Office of Intergovernmental Management, but the extension shall not exceed 15 days. [Amended, Chapter 101, Statutes of 19831 66452.8. Subdivider required to give written notice to prospective tenants of Intent to convert (a) Commencing at a date not less than 60 days prior to the filing of a tentative map pursuant to Section 66452, the subdivider or his or her agent shall give notice of such filing, in the form outlined in subdivision (b), to each person applying after such date for rental of a unit of the subject prop- erty immediately prior to the acceptance of any rent or deposit from the prospective tenant by the subdivider. (b) The notice shall be as follows: "To the prospective occupant(s) of .I The owners) of this building, at (address), has filed or plansAres todf le a tentative map with the (city, county, or city and county) to convert this j building to a (condominium, community apartment, or stock cooperative project). No units may be sold in this building unless the conversion is ap- proved by the (city, county, or city and county) and until after a public re- port is issued by the Department of Real Estate. If you become a tenant of this building, you shall be given notice of each hearing for which notice is re- quired pursuant to Sections 66451.3 and 66452.5 of the Government Code,and you have the right to appear and the right to be heard at any such hearing. (signature of owner or owner's agent) i (dated) ' I have received this notice on { - (date) (prospective tenant's signature)" 38 -�` C OMT Off pads 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE(619)346-0611 PLANNING CXXIMSSION MEETING NOTICE OF ACTION Date: January 19, 1990 Lundin Development, Co. Watt Industries V/S Associates 23501 Park Sorrento, Palm Springs Inc. 42-280 Beacon Hill Suite 207 P.O. Box 2026 Suite D-1 Calabasas, CA 91302 Palm Springs, CA 92263 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Re: (TT 24632 (Revision #1) The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of January 16, 1990. PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVED TT 24632 REVISION #1 By ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 1417, SUBJECT TO OONDITIONS AS AMENDED. CARRIED 3_0 Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Community Development, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. Z;e RAM ON A. DIAZ, SE PALM DESERT PLANNING V44ISSION RAD/tm cc: Coachella Valley Water District Public Works Department Building & Safety Department Fire Marshal PLANN12C OU MISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1417 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING EMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP TO SUBDIVIDE 77.8 GROSS ACRES INTO 176 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS, 2 ADDITIONAL LOTS SET ASIDE FOR 213 FUTURE APARTMENT UNITS AND A LOT FOR THE EXISTING C.V.W.D. WELL SITE, THE WHOLE SITE LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE AND PORTOLA AVENUE, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS APN 622- 020-037 AND 046. CASE NO. TT 24632 WHEREAS, the Planning Cannission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 16th day of January, 1990, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider the request of LUNDIN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY for the above mentioned project; and WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedure for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 80-89, " in that the director of community development has determined that the project will not have a significant impact on the environment and a negative declaration has been prepared; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said planning commission did find the following facts and reasons as justified in the staff report for TT 24632 dated January 16, 1990, on file in the department of community development, to exist to approve the tentative tract map: (a) That the proposed map is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. (b) That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. . (c) That the site is physically suitable for the type of development. (d) That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development. (e) That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. (f) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems. (g) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will ,not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. WHEREAS, in the review of this tentative tract map the planning coTnission has considered the effect of the contemplated action on the housing needs of the region for purposes of balancing these needs against the public service needs of the residents of the City of Palm Desert and its environs, with available fiscal and environmental resources. PLANNING CcmTaSSION Pdm Yrim N0. 1417 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Cbmnission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the camLi.ssion in this case. 2. That it does hereby approve the above described Tentative Tract Map No. TT 24632 for the reasons set forth in this resolution and subject to the attached conditions. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Ccmrussion, held on this 16th day of Janes, 1990, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: JONATHAN, RICHARDS, AND WHITLOCK NOES: NONE ABSENT: DOWNS AND ERWOOD ABSTAIN: NONE JJ CAROL wHITLUX, Chairperson ATTEST: RAMON A. DIAZ, Secret SRS/tm 2 f J PLANNING OaIMISSION RESOLUPICN ND. 1417 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE ND. TT 24632 Departrnent of Comrmmity Devel t/Pl 1. The development of the property shall conform substantially with exhibits on file with the department of oammn-dty development/planning, as modified by the following conditions. 2. Construction of a portion of said project shall commence within one year from the date of final approval unless an extension of time is granted; otherwise said approval shall become null, void and of no effect whatsoever. 3. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein which are in addition to all municipal ordinances and state and federal statutes now in force, or which hereafter may be in force. 4. Prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contemplated by this approval, the applicant shall first obtain permits and/or clearance from the following agencies: Coachella Valley Water District Palm Desert Architectural Crnndssicn City Fire Marshal Public Works Department Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to the department of building and safety at the time of issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. 5. That any future development on the remainder Phase 5 parcels, for a total of up to 213 apartment units, is subject to the city first approving a precise plan of design for same. 6. That the applicant submit and receive approval of the architectural review commission of a landscape and wall plan to be installed with each phase. 7. That development on the apartment site (lots 170 and 171) shall be limited to a maximum height of 24 feet for pitched roofs and 22 feet for flat roofs. 8. As part of development of phase I, the streetscape along Portola Avenue including the masonry wall, landscaping, and sidewalk will be completed. 3 PLANNING CC"4ISSICN RESOLUrICN ND. 1417 9. The Portola entrance to the remainder parcel will be walled off until development of the site is commenced. 10. Developer will construct a raised median and landscaping on Portola Avenue in keeping with city standards and will agree to join an assessment district formed under the 1972 Lighting and Landscape Maintenance Act. 11. Development on the remainder parcel shall be as shown on site plans and elevation dated June 20, 1989 and on file with the department of community development, a reduction of which is attached hereto as exhibit B. 12. All development on the remainder parcel shall conform to the Portola "sight line" exhibit on file with the community development department, a reduction of which is hereto attached as exhibit C. 13. That the gated entries be designed to provide a minimum of four car stacking (i.e. waiting to enter) and provide turn around for rejected vehicles. 14. That two story development shall be limited to lots as delineated on the revised tentative map as lot Ws 1-22, 107-118, 124-125, and 136, with staff to have authority to make minor modifications to approval provided it adheres to the comtission's philosophy regarding two story development. 15. That on lots adjacent to the Casa Blanca development (lot Ws 41 through 54 inclusive and lots 90 through 105 inclusive) the maximum building height shall be 18 feet. 16. That on lots 1 through 39 inclusive, 55 through 89 inclusive and 106 through 177 inclusive the maximum building height shall be as determined by Architectural Review Commission in its review and approval of the model units. 17. That all lots shall comply with the setback and coverage requirements prescribed for the R-1 zone, section 25.16.050. 18. That the developer agree to notify purchasers of all single story units located adjacent to, or across the street from proposed two story units that a two story home is proposed on the lot or lots adjacent or across the street therefrom. Said notice to be in a form acceptable to the city. Said form to be signed by the purchaser prior to close of escrow and copy of same to be filed by the seller (developer) with the city within 10 days . of close of escrow. Failure of seller (developer) to file said notice with the city within 10 days of close of escrow may result in delays in processing of future phases. 4 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1417 Department of Public Works: 1. Drainage fees, in accordance with Section 26.49 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code and Palm Desert Ordinance Number 507, shall be paid prior to recordation of final map. 2. Drainage facilities shall be provided, per Ordinance No. 216 and the Northside Area Drainage Master Plan, to the specifications of the director of public works. 3. Storm drain construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study prepared by a registered civil engineer that is reviewed and approved by the department of public works prior to start of construction. 4. Signalization fees, in accordance with City of Palm Desert Resolution Nos. 79-17 and 79-55, shall be paid prior to recordation of final map. 5. Full public improvements, as required by Sections 26.40 and 26.44 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code, shall be installed in accordance with applicable city standards. 6. As required under Palm Desert Municipal Cade Section 26.28, and in accordance with Section 26.28, and in accordance with Sections 26.40 and 26.44, complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted to the director of public works for checking approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. Offsite improvement plans to be approved by the public works department and a surety posted to guarantee the installation of required offsite improvements prior to recordation of final map. Such offsite improvements shall include, but not be limited to, curb and gutter, asphalt paving and concrete sidewalk in an appropriate size and configuration and provisions for deceleration lanes at the all project entry points. "As-built" plans shall be submitted to, and approved by, the director of public works prior to acceptance of the improvements by the city. 7. Improvement plans for water and sewer systems shall be approved by the respective service districts with "as-built" plans submitted to the department of public works prior to project final. 8. All public improvements shall be inspected by the department of public works and a standard inspection fee shall be paid prior to issuance of grading permits. 9. Landscaping maintenance on Country Club Drive shall be provided by the homeowners association. 10. Waiver of access to Country Club Drive except at approved locations shall be granted on the final map. 5 PLANNIWG CaMMSSION RESOLUTION NO. 1417 11. In accordance with Palm Desert Municipal Code Section 26.44, complete grading plans and specifications shall be submitted to the director of public works for checking and approval prior to issuance of any permits. 12. In accordance with the Circulation Network of the City of Palm Desert's General Plan, installation of one-half landscaped median island in Country Club Drive shall be provided. A cash payment in lieu of actual installation may be submitted at the option of the director of public works. 13. Traffic safety striping on Country Club Drive and Portola Avenue shall be provided to the specifications of the Director of Public Works. A traffic control plan must be submitted to, and approved by, the director of public works prior to the placement of any pavement markings. 14. Full improvements of interior streets based on residential street standards in accordance with Section 26.40 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code shall be provided. 15. Complete tract map shall be submitted as required by ordinance to the director of public works for checking and approval and be recorded before issuance of any permits. 16. Any and all offsite improvements shall be preceded by the approval of plans and the issuance of valid encroachment permits by the department of public works. 17. A complete preliminary soils investigation, conducted by a registered soils engineer, shall be submitted to and approved by the department of public works prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 18. Pad elevations, as shown on the tentative map are subject to review and modification in accordance with Chapter 27 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code. 19. As required under Section 12.16 and Section 26.44 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code, all existing utilities shall be undergrounded per each respective utility districts recommendation. If determined to be unfeasible, applicant shall agree to participate in any future utility undergrounding district. 20. As required by Sections 26.32 and 26.40 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code, and in accordance with the Circulation Network of the City's General Plan, dedication of half-street right-of-way at 55 feet on Country Club Drive and 50 feet on Portola Avenue shall be provided on the .final map. 21. Traffic analysis to be prepared for this project to address the specific impacts on existing circulation network (streets and intersections) as 6 PINNING CM4ISSICN RESCLUPICN NO. 1417 well as proposed street/intersection configuration. The report shall include specific mitigation measures and shall be reviewed and approved by the public works department prior to the approval of the final map or issuance of any permits associated with the project; 22. All required offsite improvements for this project shall be installed in accordance with the following schedule: Phase 1: All Portola Avenue improvements Phase 2: Interior connector street-Portola Avenue to Country Club Drive including necessary traffic signal modifications Phase 3: All Country Club Drive improvements including undergrounding of overhead utilities The balance of the required improvements shall be installed with the related phase of development. 23. The existing traffic signal located at Country Club Drive and Palm Greens Parkway .shall be modified to accommodate the proposed four leg intersection. 24. Applicant shall agree to contribute their fair share to the assessed costs for the Cook Street Extension and Bridge Fund. Riverside County Fire t: 1. The fire department is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel Or construction of all commercial buildings per Uniform Fire Code Sec. 10.301C. 2. Provide or show there exists a water system capable of providing a potential fire flow of 2500 gpn and the actual fire flow available from any one hydrant connected to any given water main shall be 1500 gpm for 2 hours duration at 20 psi residual operating pressure, for apartment area. Provide a water system for the residential area that provides 1500 gpm fire flow (must be available from any one hydrant). 3. A fire flow of 1500 gpm for a 2 hour duration at 20 psi residual operating pressure must be available before any combustible material is placed on the job site. 4. The required fire flow shall be available from a Super hydrant(s) (6" x 4" x 2-1/2" x 2-1/2"), located not less than 25' nor more than 150' from any portion of the building(s) as measured along approved vehicular travelways. Hydrants installed below 3000' elevation shall be of the "wet barrel" type. 7 PLAMI% OCNMISSIM RESOLUTICN NO. 1417 5. A canbination of on-site and off-site Super fire hydrants, (6" x 4" x 2- 1/2" x 2-1/2"), will be required, located not less than 25' or more than 150' from any portion of the building(s) as measured along approved vehicular travelways. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. 6. The required fire flow may be adjusted at a later point in the permit process to reflect changes in design, construction type area separations, or built-in fire protection measures. 7. Prior to the application for a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and two copies of the water system plan to the county fire department for review. No building permit shall be issued until the water system plan has been approved by the county fire chief. Upon approval, the original will be returned. One copy will be sent to the responsible inspecting authority. S. Plans shall conform to fire hydrant types, location and spacing, and the system shall meet the fire flow requirements. plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and may be signed by the local water company with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Riverside Country Fire Department." 9. Certain designated areas will be required to be maintained as fire lanes. 10. Install portable fire extinguishers per NFPA, Panphlet #10, but not less than 2AlOBC in rating. 11. All buildings shall be accessible by an all-weather roadway extending to within 150' of all portions of the exterior walls of the first story. The roadway shall be not less than 24' of unobstructed width and 13'6" of vertical clearance. Where parallel parking is allowed, the roadway shall be 36' wide with parking on both sides, 32' wide with parking on one side. Dead-end roads in excess of 150' shall be provided with a minimum 45' radius turn-around (55' in industrial developments). 12. The minimum width of interior driveways for multi-family or apartment complexes shall be: a. 24 feet wide when serving less than 100 units, no parallel parking; carports or garages allowed on one side only. b. 28 feet wide when serving between 100 and 300 units; carports or garaged allowed on both sides, no parallel parking. C. 32 feet wide when serving over 300 units or when parallel parking is allowed on one side. 8 PLAM D G Oa�TfIISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1417 d. 36 feet wide when parallel parking is allowed on both sides. 13. Whenever access into private property is controlled through use of gates, barriers, guard houses or similar means, provision shall be made to facilitate access by emergency vehicles in a manner approved by the fire department. All controlled access devices that are power operated shall have a radio-controlled over-ride_ system capable of opening the gate when activated by a special transmitter located in emergency vehicles. Devices shall be equipped with backup power facilities to operate in the event of power failure. All controlled access devices that are not power operated shall also be approved by the fire department. Minimum .opening width shall be 12' with a minimise vertical clearance of 1316". 14. Dead-end streets over 500 feet are not permitted. Provide adequate circulation in those areas, 15. Contact the fire department for a final inspection prior to occupancy. SRS/trn 9 Southern California Edison Company P. O. BOX 410 100 LONG BEACH BOULEVARD LONG BEACH. CALIFORNIA 90801 WESTERN REGION TELEPHONE LAND SERVICES DIVISION 12131 491.2946 REAL PROPERTIES AND ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES FAX(213)491 2675 Honorable City Council October 30, 1989 City of Palm Desert 730510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 Council Members : SUBJECT: Tract Map No . 24632 Please be advised that the division of the property shown on Tract Map No. 24632 will not unreasonably interfere with the free and complete exercise of any easement(s) held by Southern California Edison Company within the boundaries of said tract map. This letter should not be construed as a subordination of the Company' s rights, title and interest in and to said easement(s) , nor should this letter be construed as a waiver of any of the provisions contained in said easement(s) or a waiver of costs for relocation of any affected facilities. In the event that the development requires relocation of facil- ities, on the subject property, which facilities exist by right of easement or otherwise, the owner/developer will be requested to bear the cost of such relocation and provide Edison with suitable replacement rights . Such costs and replacement rights are required prior to the performance of the relocation. If additional information is required in connection with the above mentioned subject, please call Dennis Bazant at (213) 491-2644 . Sincerely, S. R. SHERMOEN RegLjoAa4 Manage e. i By NIS C. ANZ Real Pro "erti Age 20787/jc cc : Orange Coast Title Company V/S Associates C�TSZSSSQJ RFS 7XCK ND. 1373 .. Two story. Front = 20 feet Rear = 25 feet Sides = 15 foot minimum I building separation 30 foot minimum mi Coverage = 25% 6. Applicant shall execute mutual access agreements with adjacent property rty 7. Development shall be subject to J Coachella Valle Fr' Y uige-Toed Lizard mitigation fee of $600/acre• DePartment of Public Works: I. Drainage fees, in accordance with Section 26.49 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code and Palm Desert Ordinance Number 507, shall be paid prior to recordation of final map. 2. Drainage facilities, as designated within the Northside Area Master Drainage Plan, shall be Public works. Added to the specifications of the director of 3• Storm drain construction shall be contingent upon a drain prepared by a registered civil engineer that is reviewed and a drainage study the department of public works AP roved by prior to start of construction. 4• Signlization fees, in accordance with City of Palm Desert Resolution Nos. 79-17 and 79-55, shall be paid prior to recordation of final map. 5. Full public improvements, as required Palm Desert Municipal Code, sshll be installed tions 6in0 accordance w26-44 of ith applicable city standards 6. As required under Palm Desert Municipal accordance with Section 26.28, P Code Section 26.28, and in %} 26.44, complete and in accordan',e with Sections 26.40 and the director ofzovnt plans and specifications shall be submitted to Public works for checking approval before "any improvements is commenced. Offsite construction of by the public works department and a improvement plans to be approved *' installation of required offsite surety Posted to guarantee the final map. Such offsite �Arovements prior to recordation of a to, curb and imp�ements shall include, but not be limited gutter, asphalt paving and concrete sidewalk .in an appropriate size and configuration, and the installation of a deceleration lane for west bound traffic entering the Project. "As-built" plans shall be submitted to, and approved by, the director of acceptance of the improvements by the city. public works prior to f I i 4 ! f I ENIGINEEAING SE91/ICE CORPORATION CONSULTANTS IN CIVIL`ENNGGJAI' ",LAND PLANNING \S Q DESCRIPTION �{� }��CV S DATE �J SHEET CHna w. o. 2Z5q— D• T6JI -- i � J \S M + N. Mlr`( u�l I 7 I - - - - -------------- r. �V �J lJ'—70 M To ,, '.a FJ 5L M \ L 'Z�' N1 I n� C o V Ea-iZ Cz-L C- I 74-303 HIGHWAY 111. SUITE A PALM DESERT. CALIFORNIA 92260 • TELEPHONE 619/568-5997 I 'Ai� • jM.'� V 4�rJ. r�•si Lam. '4T _..�.�. „ ., •..t LIZ:, :7 fCr+t J i pa 7. 3t10 aft �prcpexty shall conform substantially with exhibits w dms.,!lt7e.wl ftme,departm�t of%commmity development/planning, as modified lkr,tA`fO"6i M omditicns. 2; Reca elation of the final map shall occur within 24 months of the date of this approval unless an extension of time is granted; otherwise said ' approval shall became null, void and of no effect whatsoever. 3. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein which are in addition to all municipal ordinances and state and federal statutes now in force, or which hereafter may be in force. 4. Prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contemplated by this approval, the applicant shall first obtain permits and/or clearance from the following agencies: Coachella Valley Water District Palm Desert Architectural Cammmission City Fire Marshal Public Works Department Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to the department of building and safety at the time of issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. 5. The following development standard shall apply: A. Building Height. The following lots will be restricted to one story: 1 through 4. Two story construction shall be permitted on the balance of the tract. One story height = 18 feet maximum Two story height = 24 feet maximum B. Setbacks. One story: Front = 20 feet Rear = 15 feet Sides = 14 feet combined, no side less than 5 feet Coverage = 35% 3 r' r TENTATIVE TRACT NOm 24632 CITY OF PALM DESERT , CA. - - - IV�j41 0 1)(��\,\, rl/`\ (�'�y+�oy'�) c..Q� �1]'^4 �e `a, {/�♦\\ fie. -/l'�.'�o, -o .c° �.$ t— ✓�. • w . _. •r (• `• �� .e�e ie i.�euuiu eunu<r-es.a r r �fl '•.cam.wr..nr .�., _. .ff.�.��u .u..u...ru..m1 wf.�w.w�w•r..<ruu.a .1 �rl � -I ..an.(ma un.ac.v..ar wayy�a r au.�a.nl "a VE OPER AND APPLICANT tm f 1 .I T L TY AGEN[•E Sm y-�••r. .0 w...v M..M....... ITI T�Y Pa1�CAL ST R�EET SECTIONS +.r ncwunew..n•aerc� l J 1 INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM ti Steve Smith, Planner OC718 1989 FROM: Seyed Safavian, Transportation Engineer COMLININ DEVSWPMLNT DEPAEIMENT CITY ��F PALM DESERT SUBJECT: PALM DESERT TRACT 24632 TRAFFIC STUDY DATE: October 18, 1989 This office has conducted a preliminary review of the above mentioned traffic study report and offer the following comments: 1. The study has been conducted based on the existing traffic flow conditions, and failed to recognize that the proposed project will be completed in the future when traffic volumes are substantially higher, and level of service at nearby intersections are expected to be lower than current conditions. 2. The study has not addressed future traffic growth on an area-wide basis or specific nearby development growth which would directly affect nearby intersection operations, and consequently lower level of service. 3. The impacts of the project on the transportation network would not be limited to the Portola/Country Club intersection. Trips generated and attracted to the proposed development site will affect other roadway segments as well as intersections such as Cook Street/Country Club Drive, Monterey Avenue/Country Club Drive, Hovley Lane/Portola Avenue and Portola Avenue/Frank Sinatra Drive. Some of these intersections are currently operating well beyond minimum acceptable level of service. However, in analyzing future conditions, one should realize that major development projects planned for currently vacant parcels adjacent to these arteries will undoubtedly cause lower level of service at intersections and roadway segments. 4. Figures shown on Page II-2 requires explanation as to the source and most importantly date when the counting was conducted. It is the City's policy to require use of high tourist (peak) season traffic counts in all traffic studies. If the subject counts are taken in periods other than peak traffic season, adjustment factors should be used to modify the data used in the study to reflect "worst case scenario". (This office can assist the applicant in this and other similar recalculations) . (Page 1 of 3) SUBJECT: PALM DESERT TRACT 24632 TRAFFIC STUDY DATE: October 18, 1989 5. Traffic volumes shown on Page II-2 are substantially lower than the counts available in this office and have been taken during offpeak season. 6. The study assumes unrestricted access to and from the site and use these assumptions for 'trip assignments' . The City Council has recently expressed its concerns over providing such access to adjacent properties while maintaining efficient traffic movements along nearby arteries. Based on that, this office may not recommend approval of multiple access with unlimited turning movement possibilities. 7. The study uses abbreviations such as TSF, IB, OB, etc. with no explanation to the readers of their meanings. 8. The report does not contain a drawing indicating assumed trip assignment, possibly on a percentage basis, to be shown by direction as to their origins or destinations. 9. The study appendix does not contain detailed traffic data such as ADT's, collected and used, in Figure II-1 documenting hourly volumes and concluding specific peak hours. 10. The study does not contain the procedures and calculations made to reach the Portola Avenue/Country Club Drive intersection level of service as shown on Page III-3. 11. The analysis of the subject intersection is based on the use of I.C.U. methodology. Such capacity calculating methodology is generally acceptable at the "General Plan" level of analysis. For other uses such as review of intersection operations and determination of capacity of intersection, where the area is generally developed and signal is operating with established phasing and cycle length I.C.U. method would not be sufficient since more detail information including turning movements, signal operation characteristics and intersection design are available. In this respect it is essential that Highway Capacity Manual (Circular 209 - for operation) be used to assess roadway segment and intersection level of service and capacity conditions. 12. The study concludes that there will be only 'minimal' impact on the traffic network. Based on such conclusion, the study does not recommend any mitigation measurement to be made as the consequence of the proposed development. Such statement and conclusion is obviously based upon a series of assumptions using selected data which to the opinion of this office require fundamental change, adjustments and correction. (Page 2 of 3) SUBJECT: PALM DESERT TRACT 24632 TRAFFIC STUDY DATE: October 18, 1989 13. Figures shown in the appendix in relation to the approach capacity and percent of green time required need clarification as to such issues as the source, procedures used to arrive at these figures. 14. In summary, .this office feels that the submitted traffic study does not meet our established requirements on such issues as study area, traffic data base to be used, capacity calculating methodologies, capacity assumptions, determination of level of service, determination of roadway segment capacity and level of service, incorporation of existing peak season conditions, study report format, growth factor assumptions, trip distribution and assignment, and other related requirements. Based on the above, we suggest that a meeting be arranged, comments made in this memorandum be discussed and appropriate technical direction be given to the consultant to revise the traffic study to meet the city requirement. SEYED SAFAVI N cc: RAY DIAZ DICK FOLKERS JOE GAUGUSH SS/lw (Page 3 of 3) i CITY OF PALM DESERT DEPARTMENT OF CM UNITY DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT T0: Planning Commission DATE: July 5, 1989 CASE NO: TT 24632 REQUEST: Approval of a tentative tract map subdividing 77.8 gross acres into 169 single family lots and 2 additional lots set aside for 220 future aparbnent units at the southwest comer of Portola Avenue and Country Club Drive. APPLICANT: Lundin Develognent, Co. 23501 Park Sorrento, Suite 207 Calabasas, CA 91302 Ferguson Engineering 46-414 Roudel Avenue La Quinta, CA 92253 I. BACIGMULM: This case was before commission at its June 6, 1989 meeting at which time it was continued. The applicant was present at the June 20, 1989 study session at which time revised plans were presented which were basically acceptable. The changes shown at that time were that a driveway parallel to Portola has been added between the first building and Portola. The result is an increase in the setback. The first row of buildings will be carports. June 28, 1989 staff received a letter form the Silver Sands Homeowners Association offering support provided four conditions are imposed (copy attached). June 28, 1989 public works submitted a revised condition #22. if crnmissicn approves the case this condition should be amended accordingly. II. RE 344E II.IATICN: A. Adoption of the findings contained in the June 6, 1989 staff report. B. Adoption of Planning Commission Resolution No. , approving TT 24632, subject to conditions. STAFF RE WT TT 24632 JMY 5, 1989 III. ATTAC[AJE M: A. Draft resolution. B. Copy of June 6, 1989 staff report. C. Plans and exhibits. Prepared by - Reviewed and Approved by /t 2 PLANIl41NG COt* ICN RES0LUrICN ND. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING CU44ISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP TO SUBDIVIDE 77.8 GROSS ACRES INTO 169 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS, 2 ADDITIONAL LOTS SET ASIDE FOR 220 FUTURE APARTMENT UNITS AND A LOT FOR THE EXISTING C.V.W.D. WELL SITE, THE WHOLE SITE LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE AND PORTOLA AVENUE, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS APN 622- 020-037 AND 046. CASE NO. TT 24632 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 6th day of June, 1989, hold a duly noticed public hearing which was continued to July 5, 1989, to consider the request of LUNDIN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY for the above mentioned project; and WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedure for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 80-89, " in that the director of unity development has determined that the project will not have a significant impact on the environment and a negative declaration has been prepared; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said planning commission dial find the following facts and reasons as justified in the staff report for TT 24632 dated June 6, 1989, on file in the departnent of community development, to exist to approve the tentative tract map: (a) That the proposed map is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. (b) That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. (c) That the site is physically suitable for the type of development. (d) That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development. (e) That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. (f) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems. (g) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. WHEREAS, in the review of this tentative tract map the planning commission has considered the effect of the contemplated action on the housing needs of the region for purposes of balancing these needs against the public service needs of the residents of the City of Palm Desert and its environs, with available fiscal and environmental resources. PLANNING QNNIISSION RESOLUTION NO. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Crnndssicn of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the ocmmission in this case. 2. That it does hereby approve the above described Tentative Tract Map No. TT 24632 for the reasons set forth in this resolution and subject to the attached conditions. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Camdssion, held on this 5th day of July, 1989, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RICHARD ERWOOD, Chairman ATTEST: RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary /tm 2 PLANNDG CU4UWICN RFSCEMICN ND. CQDr1Z0BS OF APPFDvAL CASE ND. Tr 24632 Department of Community Develcpnent/Planninq: 1. The development of the property shall conform substantially with exhibits on file with the department of community development/planning, as modified by the following conditions. 2. Construction of a portion of said project shall commence within one year from the date of final approval unless an extension of time is granted; otherwise said approval shall become null, void and of no effect whatsoever. 3. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein which are in addition to all municipal ordinances and state and federal statutes now in force, or which hereafter may be in force. 4. Prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contemplated by this approval, the applicant shall first obtain permits and/or clearance from the following agencies: Coachella Valley Water District Palm Desert Architectural Commission City Fire Marshal Public Works Department Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be Presented to the department of building and safety at the time of issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. 5. That the setbacks for single family dwellings in this project shall be ss� required in the R-1 zone for 8,000 square foot minimum lot area as Prescribed in section.25.16.050 of the zoning ordinance. 6. That any future development on lots 170 and 171, for a total of up to 220 apartment units, is subject to the city first approving a precise plan of design for same. 7. That the applicant submit and receive approval of the architectural review ccamission of a landscape and wall plan to be installed with each phase as follows: 3 PLANNIM OCWLS.SION RESOLUrICN N0. Ph ase 1• a. Parkway landscaping and wall at east limit of lots 22, 23, 24 and 172 and at the south limit of lots 20, 21, and 22. b. Six (6) foot wall along the north limit of lots 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, and 32. Phase 2: Six (6) foot wall along north limit of lots 1 through 9 inclusive. Phase 3: Six (6) foot wall along the north limit of lots 32, 33, 34, and 35. Phase 4: Six (6) foot wall and parkway landscaping along the east limit of lots 1, 2, and 3; six (6) foot wall along the north limit of lots 3, 4, 5, 6, and 9; a six (6) foot wall and parkway landscaping along east limit of lots 30 and 31; and a six (6) foot wall along the south limit of lots 21, 22, 23, and 24. Phase 5: a. A six (6) foot wall along the south limit of lots 25, 26, and 27 and along the east limit of lots 4, 5, and 6. b. A six (6) foot wall and parkway landscaping along the north limit of lots 7, 8, 9, and 10. Phase 6: Six (6) foot wall and parkway landscaping along Country Club Drive and Portola Avenue adjacent to lots 170 and 171. 8. That development on the apartment site (lots 170 and 171) shall be limited to a maxixrum height of 24 feet for pitched roofs and 22 feet for flat roofs. 4 PLANNDG OCVMSSION RESOLVPION NO. 9. That there shall be no driveway access in the following locations: a. Along the south limit of lots 20, 21 and 22 and the east limit of lots 22, 23, and 24 in phase 1. b. Along the west limit of lots 8 and 14 in phase 1. C. Along the east limit of lots 17 and 18 in phase 2. d. Along the west limit of lots 32 and the east limit of lot 31 in phase 3. e. Along the east limit of lots 1, 2, 3, 30, and 31 and along the north limit of lots 32 and 33 in phase 4. /rip D�artment of Public Works: 1. Drainage fees, in accordance with Section 26.49 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code and Palm Desert Ordinance Number 507, shall be paid prior to recordation of final map. 2. Drainage facilities shall be provided, per Ordinance No. 218 and the Nortbside Area Drainage Master Plan, to the specifications of the director of public works. 3. Storm drain construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study prepared by a registered civil engineer that is reviewed and approved by the department of public works prior to start of construction. 4. Signalization fees, in accordance with City of Palm Desert Resolution Nos. 79-17 and 79-55, shall be paid prior to recordation of final map. 5. Full public improvements, as required by Sections 26.40 and 26.44 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code, shall be installed in accordance with applicable city standards. 6. As required under Palm Desert Municipal Code Section 26.28, and in accordance with Section 26.28, and in accordance with Sections 26.40 and 26.44, complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted to the director of public works for checking approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. Offsite improvement plans to be approved by the public works department and a surety posted to guarantee the installation of required offsite improvements prior to recordation of final map. Such offsite improvements shall include, but not be limited to, curb and gutter, asphalt paving and concrete sidewalk in an appropriate size and configuration and provisions for deceleration lanes at the all proJeot entry points. "As-built" plans shall be submitted to, 5 PIANNIIM 00MIISSIM RESOLUTION NO. and approved by, the director of public works prior to acceptance of the improvements by the city. 7. Improvement plans for water and sewer systems shall be approved by the respective service districts with "as-built" plans submitted to the department of public works prior to project final. 8. All public improvements shall be inspected by the department of public works and a standard inspection fee shall be paid prior to issuance of grading permits. 9. Landscaping maintenance on Country Club Drive shall be provided by the homeowners association. 10. Waiver of access to Country Club Drive except at approved locations shall be granted on the final map. 11. In accordance with Palm Desert Municipal Code Section 26.44, complete grading plans and specifications shall be submitted to the director of public works for checking and approval prior to issuance of any permits. 12. In accordance with the Circulation Network of the City of Palm Desert's General Plan, installation of one-half landscaped median island in Country Club Drive shall be provided. A cash payment in lieu of actual installation may be submitted at the option of the director of public works. 13. Traffic safety striping on Country Club Drive and Portola Avenue shall be provided to the specifications of the Director of Public Works. A traffic control plan must be submitted to, and approved by, the director of public works prior to the placement of any pavement markings. 14. Full improvements of interior streets based on residential street standards in accordance with Section 26.40 of the Palm Desert Municipal . Code shall be provided. 15. Crnplete tract map shall be submitted as required by ordinance to the director of public works for checking and approval and be recorded before issuance of any permits. 16. Any and all offsite improvements shall be preceded by the approval of plans and the issuance of valid encroachment permits by the department of public works. 17. A complete preliminary soils investigation, conducted by a registered soils engineer, shall be submitted to and approved by the department of public works prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 6 PLANNING CO IISSICN RESOLUTION NO. 18. Pad elevations, as shown on the tentative map are subject to review and modification in accordance with Chapter 27 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code. 19. As required under Section 12.16 and Section 26.44 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code, all existing utilities shall be underground9d per each respective utility districts recommendation. If determined to be unfeasible, applicant shall agree to participate in any future utility undergrounding district. 20. As required by Sections 26.32 and 26.40 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code, and in accordance with the Circulation Network of the City's General Plan, dedication of half-street right-of-way at 55 feet on Country Club Drive and 50 feet on Portola Avenue shall be provided on the final map. 21. Traffic analysis to be prepared for this project to address the specific impacts on existing circulation network (streets and intersections) as well as proposed street/intersection configuration. The report shall include specific mitigation measures and shall be reviewed and approved by the public works department prior to the approval of the final map or issuance of any permits associated with the project. 22. All required offsite improvements for this project shall be installed in conjunction with the first phase of development. In addition, construction of the interior loop street (Portola Avenue to Country Club Drive) shall coincide with first phase development. 23. The existing traffic signal located at Country Club Drive and Palm Greens Parkway shall be modified to accommodate the proposed four leg intersection. 24. Applicant shall agree to contribute their fair share to the assessed costs for the Cook Street Extension and Bridge Find. Riverside County Fire Department: 1. The fire department is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all canTercial buildings per Uniform Fire Code Sec. 10.301C. 2. Provide or show there exists a water system capable of providing a potential fire flow of 2500 gpm and the actual fire flow available from any one hydrant corrected to any given water main shall be 1500 gpm for 2 hours duration at 20 psi residual operating pressure, for apartment area. Provide a water system for the residential area that provides 1500 gpm fire flow (must be available from any one hydrant). 7 PLAN IM CIMUSSICN RESOT mCN ND. 3. A fire flow of 1500 gpm for a 2 hour duration at 20 psi residual operating pressure must be available before any combustible material is placed on the job site. 4. The required fire flaw shall be available from a Super hydrant(s) (6" x 4" x 2-1/2" x 2-1/2"), located not less than 25' nor more than 150' from any portion of the building(s) as measured along approved vehicular travelways. Hydrants installed below 3000' elevation shall be of the "wet barrel" type. 5. A canbination of on-site and off-site Super fire hydrants, (6" x 4" x 2- 1/2" x 2-1/2"), will be required, located not less than 25' or more than 150' from any portion of the building(s) as measured along approved vehicular travelways. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. 6. The required fire flow may be adjusted at a later point in the permit process to reflect changes in design, ccnstruction type, area separations, or built-in fire protection measures. 7. Prior to the application for a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and two copies of the water system plan to the county fire department for review. No building permit shall be issued until the water system plan has been approved by the county fire chief. Upon approval, the original will be returned. One copy will be sent to the responsible inspecting authority. 8. Plans shall conform to fire hydrant types, location and spacing, and the system shall meet the fire flow requirements. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and may be signed by the local water company with the following certification: "I certify that the benign of the water system is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Riverside Country Fire Department." 9. Certain designated areas will be required to be maintained as fire lanes. 10. Install portable fire extinguishers per NFPA, Pamphlet #10, but not less than 2AlOBC in rating. 11. All buildings shall be accessible by an all-weather roadway extending to within 150' of all portions of the exterior walls of the first story. The roadway shall be not less than 24' of unobstructed width and 13'6" of vertical clearance. Where parallel parking is allowed, the roadway shall be 36' wide with parking on both sides, 32' wide with parking on one side. Dead-end roads in excess of 150' shall be provided with a minimum 45' radius turn-around (55' in industrial ustrial developments). 8 PLANNIiG CU4ffMICN FdSouirim ND. 12. The minunwn width of interior driveways for multi-family or apartment complexes shall be: a. 24 feet wide when serving less than 100 units, no parallel parking; carports or garages allowed on one side only. b. 28 feet wide when serving between 100 and 300 units; carports or garaged allowed on both sides, no parallel parking. C. 32 feet wide when serving over 300 units or when parallel parking is allowed on one side. d. 36 feet wide when parallel parking is allowed on both sides. 13. Whenever access into private property is controlled through use of gates, barriers, guard houses or similar means, provision shall be made to facilitate access by emergency vehicles in a manner approved by the fire department. All controlled access devices that are power operated shall have a radio-controlled over-ride system capable of ern*+;g the gate when activated by a special transmitter located in emergency vehicles. Devices shall be equipped with backup power facilities to operate in the event of Power failure. All controlled access devices that are not power operated shall also be approved by the fire department. Minumnn opening width shall be 12' with a minimum vertical clearance of 13'6". 14. Dead-end streets over 500. feet are not permitted. Provide adequate circulation in those areas. 15. Contact the fire department for a final inspection prior to occupancy. /tin 9 SILVER SANDS RACQUET CLUB HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION P. O. Box 1398 Palm Desert, CA. 92261 June 27 , 1989 r,i g 1989 City of Palm Desert - .. Department of Planning 73 510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA. 92261 RE: Case # TT 24632 - Luko Development Company Dear Sirs : This letter reaffirms the agreement tentatively reached at the Planning Commission Workshop of June 20 , 1989 . Appreciation is expressed to the Planning Commission for conducting this meeting and for the cooperation of the Developer. Hopefully, the modified project will meet the goals and objectives of the City, the Developer and the Community. This property is nurrently zoned PR-5 (3-5 dwelling units per acre) . All of it! This project would split the property into one parcel of 45 acres on which 169 units are proposed, and a second parcel of 27 . 9 acnres on which 220 units would be allowed (7 . 9 units per acre) . Care must be taken at this time that controls and conditions are imposed on the entire land area to assure compliance with present zoning and the Master Plan. The project as originally proposed would split the land (and possibly the ownership) permitting development in a disjointed and non complying manner. I^ keeping with the Master plan, project approval must be conditioned to assure harmony of the entire land area with the surrounding community. Silver Sands Racquet Club Residents are very concerned about the transition of development from PR-4 on the East side of Portola to PR-5 on the west side not being in harmony with the Master Plan. Development on any part of Portola at 7 . 9 units per acre is very "inharmonious" . The Board of Directors of the Silver Sands Racquet Club Homeowners Association recommends project approval with the modifications and �nnditions agreed to at the Workshop: 1 . Before, or simultaneously with initial construction, install a landscaped strip at least thirty feet wide, with a meandering sidewalk extending from the Fire Station to the North, to the Casablanca development to the South, on the West side of Portola. Maintenance of such strip to be the responsibility of present and future owners of the properties described in Case # TT 24632 . 2 . Concurrent with the landscaping, construct a wall around the perimeter of the property facing both Country Club Drive and Portola, and construct entrances and/or exits in keeping with those renderings submitted to the commission on June 20, 1989 . 3 . Provide for maximum traffic safety on Country Club Drive and Portola. It is our recommendation that right turns in, left turns in, and right turns out be permitted at both entrances on Portola, but that left turns out be prohibited. We also recommend a raised median strip be constructed to facilitate safe turning movements . 4 . To assist in the transition from PR-4 zoning on the East side of Portola to PR-5 on the West side of Portola, no multiple story or multiple family structures would be permitted within three hundred feet of Portola. Mr. James Gleason will represent the Board of Directors and all members of the Silver Sands Racquet Club Homeowners Association in this matter. Again , your consideration of community concerns is appreciated. Sincerely, Harold Barnes, Property Manager on behalf of the Board of Directors Silver Sands Racquet Club Homeowners Association JG: ls cc: Mr. Herb Lundin, Luko Management, Inc. Planning Directors, Mr. Diaz City Planner, Mr. Smith Mr. Richard Erwood, Planning Commission Mr. James Richards, Planning Commission Mr. Robert Downs, Planning Commission Ms . Carol Whitlock, Planning Commission Mr. Sabby Jonathan, Planning Commission Silver Sands Racquet Club H.O.A. Board of Directors FILE: 39COMMIS Page 2 & W,A J 4 • INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Department of Comm"Pity Development/Planning Attention: Steve Smith FROM: Richard J. Folkers, Asst . City Manager/Public Works Director SUBJECT: TENTATIVE TRACT 24632, LUNDIN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY AMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL DATE: June 28, IqRq The following condition of approval for the above-referenced project represents an amended condition for the project and should included in the appropriate resolution. (22) All required offsite improvements for this project shall be installed in accordance with the following schedule: PHASE [: ALL PORTOLA AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS PHASE 2: INTERIOR CONNECTOR STREET-PORTOLA AVENUE TO COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE INCLUDING NECESSARY TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATIONS PHASE 3 : ALL COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDING UNDERGROUNDING OF OVERHEAD UTILITIES ---------- ,�RICHARD J. FOLKERS, P.E. CITY OF PALM DESERT DEPARTMENT OF ClMIldITY DEVELLD*EM STAFF REPORT TO: Planing Crnrtussion DATE: June 6, 1989 CASE NO: TT 24632 REQUEST: Approval of a tentative tract map subdividing 77.8 gross acres into 169 single family lots and 2 additional lots set aside for 220 future apartment units at the southwest corner of Portola Avenue and Country Club Drive. APPLICANT: Lundin Development, Co. 23501 Park Sorrento, Suite 207 Calabasas, CA 91302 Ferguson Engineering 46-414 Roudel Avenue La Quinta, CA 92253 I. BACKGROUND: I A. DESCRIPTION OF SITE: The site is a vacant 78 +/- acre property which slopes from north to south. B. ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE: North: Residential/Palm Desert Greens South: PR-5/Casablanca East: PR-4/Silver Sands Racquet Club West: AHDPR-22/San Trcpez Apartments C. ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN DESIG1%1ATION: The site is zoned PR-5, five dwelling units per acre and the general plan designation is residential low density (3-5 dwelling units per acre). The zoning is consistent with the general plan. D. ZONE REQUIREMENTTS: The plan as submitted is unique in that it proposes a total of 389 dwelling units split between 3.75 units per acre detached single family subdivision (169 units on 45 acres) and a 7.9 units per acre apartment complex (220 units on 27.9 acres). The PR zone allows density to be determined based on gross acreage and hence the total of 389 permitted dwelling units (77.8 acres x 5 units per acre). STAFF REPORT TP 24632 JUNE 6, 1989 This property is zoned PR-5. Section 25.24.190 permits commission to impose such conditions it deems necessary to carry out the general purpose of the section. Part of this development is for a single family subdivision and, therefore, staff feels it is appropriate to establish standards for this project consistent with the R-1 standards. R-1 Standards Minimum lot area 8000. square feet minimum lot width 70 feet Minimum lot depth none Minimum dwelling unit size 1000 square feet Maximum height 18 feet Maximum coverage limit 35% Minimum front yard 20 feet Minimum rear yard 15 feet Minimum side yard Total 14 feet-minimum 5 feet Minimum street side yard 10 feet The 169 lots as proposed conform to the minimum required lot area, lot width and lot depths as prescribed in the ordinance. The design of the future hones on these lots will be required to oonform to the other standards noted above. II. PFDJBCP LAYOUT: The apartment section-and the single family portion are each provided with one access onto Portola Avenue and there is one access onto Country Club. The north-south access street into the single family area aligns with the existing signal and entry to Palm Desert Greens- to the north. In addition, this north-south street provides access to the apartment complex before the street enters the single family area. III. ANALYSIS: A. FINDINGS NEEDED FOR APPROVAL OF THE TENTATIVE TRACT MAP: 1. That the proposed map is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. Justification: The proposed map is consistent with the zoning and the zoning is consistent with the general plan. Compliance with the conditions and mitigation measures will assure consistency with the general plan. 2 STAFF REPORT TT 24632 Jain 6, 1989 2. That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. Justification: All public streets will be dedicated and improved and sufficient drainage facilities will be provided in conformance with the general plan guidelines and city ordinances. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the type of development. Justification: The 77.8 acre site is of sufficient size to accommodate the Proposed project and the topography of the site does not create significant problems. 4. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development. Justification: The design of the project indicates that the site is suitable for the proposed density of development because the site can be served by respective utilities and, as conditioned, to provide full traffic circulation and is designed in compliance with all city codes. 5. The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. Justification: The design will not cause substantial envirvramtal damage or injure fish or wildlife or their habitat because it will be constructed in compliance with applicable regulations and the proposed negative declaration has determined that there will be no related adverse environmental effect which cannot be mitigated. 6. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems. Justification: The design will not cause serious public health problems because it will be in compliance with applicable health, safety and building codes. 3 STAFF REPORT TT 24632 JUNE 6, 1989 7. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. Justification: There has been an easement acquired by the public at large for access or use of property within the proposed subdivision. The easement is no longer deemed necessary and will be removed by means of a quit claim. B. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not restrict solar access to the property. Justification: The project has been designed to conform to code requirements and will not impact solar access to adjacent properties and will provide adequate solar access to this property. IV. ENVIRUME IAL REVUW: The director of community development has determined that the proposed project will not have a significant effect on the environment and a negative declaration of environmental impact has been prepared. V. RECOMMENIDATICK: A. Adoption of the findings. B. Adoption of PlacnZirxJ Commission Resolution No. approving TT 24632, subject to conditions. VI. ATTACHMENTS. A. Draft resolution. B. Legal notice. C. Negative declaration. D. Plans and exhibits. Prepared by Reviewed and Approved /t 4 INTEROFFICE NENORANDUN TO: Department of Community Development/Planning Attention: Steve Smith FROM: Richard J. Folkers, Asst. City Manager/Public Works Director SUBJECT: TENTATIVE TRACT 24632, LUNDIN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY DATE: May 11, 1989 The following should be considered conditions of approval for the above- referenced project: (1) Drainage fees, in accordance with Section 26.49 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code and Palm Desert Ordinance Number 507, shall be paid prior to recordation of final map. (2) Drainage facilities shall be provided, per Ordinance No. 218 and the Northside Area Drainage Master Plan, to the specifications of the Director of Public Works. (3) Storm drain construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study prepared by a registered civil engineer that is reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works prior to start of construction. (4) Signalization fees, in accordance with City of Palm Desert Resolution Nos. 79-17 and 79-55, shall be paid prior to recordation of final map. (5) Full public improvements, as required by Sections 26.40 and 26.44 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code, shall be installed in accordance with applicable City standards . (6) As required under Palm Desert Municipal Code Section 26.28, and in accordance with Sections 26.40 and 26.44, complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted to the Director of Public works for checking approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. Offsite improvement plans to be approved by the Public: Works Department and a surety posted to guarantee the installation of required offsite improvements prior to recordation of final map. Such offsite improvements shall include, but not be limited to, curb and gutter, asphalt paving and concrete sidewalk in an appropriate size and configuration and provisions for deceleration lanes at the all project entry points. "As-built" plans shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Director of Public Works prior to the acceptance of the improvements by the city. (7) Improvement plans for water and sewer systems shall be approved by the respective service districts with "as-built" plans submitted to the Department of Public Works prior to project final. (8) All public improvements shall be inspected by the Department of Public Works and a standard inspection fee shall be paid prior to issuance of grading permits. (9) Landscaping maintenance on Country Club Drive shall be provided by the homeowners association. (10) Waiver of access to Country Club Drive except at approved locations shall be granted on the Final Map. (11) I❑ accordance with Palm Desert Municipal Code Section 26.44, complete grading plans and specifications shall be submitted to the Director of Public Works for checking and approval prior to issuance of any permits. (12) In accordance with the Circulation Network of the City of Palm Desert's General Plan, installation of one-half landscaped median island in Country Club Drive shall be provided. A cash payment in lieu of actual installation may be submitted at the option of the Director of Public Works. (13) Traffic safety striping on Country Club Drive and Portola Avenue shall be provided to the specifications of the Director of Public Works. A traffic control plan must be submitted to, and approved by, the Director of Public Works prior to the placement of any pavement markings. (14) Full improvements of .interior streets based on residential street standards in accordance with Section 26.40 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code shall be provided. (15) Complete .tract map shall be submitted as required by ordinance to the Director of Public Works for checking and approval and be recorded before issuance of any permits. (16) Any and all offsite improvements shall be preceded by the approval of plans and the issuance of valid encroachment permits by the Department of Public Works. (17) A complete preliminary soils investigation, conducted by a registered soils engineer, shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Department of Public Works prior to the issuance of a grading permit. � R (18) Pad elevations, as shown on the tentative map are subject to review and modification in accordance with Chapter 27 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code. (19) As required under Section 12.16 and Section 26.44 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code, all existing utilities shall be undergrounded per each respective utility districts recommendation. If determined to be unfeasible, applicant shall agree to participate in any future utility undergrounding district. (20) As required by Sections 26.32 and 26.40 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code, and in accordance with the Circulation Network of the City's General Plan, dedication of half-street right-of-way at 55 feet on Country Club Drive and 50 feet on Portola Avenue shall be provided on the final map. (21) Traffic analysis to be prepared for this project to address the specific impacts on existing circulation network (streets and intersections) as well as proposed street/intersection configuration. The report shall include specific mitigation measures and shall be reviewed and approved by the Public works Department prior to the approval of the final map or issuance of any permits associated with the project. (22) All required offsite improvements for this project shall be installed in conjunction with the first phase of development . In addition, construction of the interior loop street ( Portola Ave. to Country Club Drive) shall coincide with first phase development. (23) The existing traffic signal located at Country Club Drive and Palm Greens Parkway shall be modified to accommodate the proposed four leg intersection. (24) Applicant shall agree to contribute their fair share to the assessed costs for the Cook Street Extension and Bridge Fund. n (RICHARD ------------------- - J602, J. FOLKERS, P.E. (jsgltr24672.ioel RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT uF CAI IN COOPERATION WITH THE coonrr CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY erveesi$e.,.,,.,; AND FIRE PROTECTION RAY HEBRARD HRE CHIEF Lea`t �i ' =5�' EMT of Plannin8 & Engineering Office i;t:,;'.',`( a 1g89anning & Engineering Office 46-209 Oasis Street, Suite 405 4080 Lemon Street, Suite I IL Indio, CA 92201 �._:vr,,;,;,;, ;,._•;,,, 'Riverside, CA 92501 i (619) 342 8886 ! v 5, G1 (714) 787-6606 a=. 1)i'". io"^,ui7. ..',-\- 'Fp an.'71 e'Cnditi '%(+C Gf 5ppY0i%al i"Egai"di'iy t;7= �:b0'ie 1`ef ':e�=cd tt;= ri_ = nepar`me.:t >.. . ',ends e fcl . cwin'a fire _n-r._._ . -t: .... b'UI^aE' b� p:"OVide-d in :,rdance with f7rifJrm Fire Coda and-or F'i: Pr,_ _ sctic•n The "il-e Depal-t:'7e.'t required 6 t -a minimum fl re flow f-,r the re.rnrje i t? :7n :".f :zll _rmw�cYCi ai _4J%Iildi n_S per [?nZ f�?YP.; F'i__- ��:�"1E ✓e'`. 0. '?01C. Zj,,z 02` show thei"� e:,:Zsts a w,3te,r System capable' Cf pro`vIc"llnq a 7 - ' 'I '; Of .-.., hi.e ,a f 1 w 3''."ai ?:3r.'l:- tr:,m a17'✓_ -_ a _� � _ _r,._ =nd _ ac`tu 1 _ 1r . f �" _ by�i'ant C0:7,?BCt eL2' t0 any gl Ven Wi"1teY main shall be l '7n_? jpll] fcT 2 hOu_LS 20 pS. _._Z aLCat :^'pe:-3t1nor .e—.1' r f."— fo' the 2-eSldent ia1 ~ai ea that provides 150 4r: - ._ e a}'le f2- fi'n JnB wi'r•C�_":317t . i fI(:1'rr GLi 0O4'(`':77 for a duratio'n at 20 psi resid,!31 tef,:)—. any ­rrtL ,hi le matr312-1:51 Z c, la," ._ _. ._ + �„ -a qU 12`ed fire flOw Sha 11 be avai lab 7e froma .Super hydrant (si !"' x 4" located n.t less than 25 ' nor more than 150 ' from any portion of the buildings) as measured along approved vehicular travelways. yd: ants install:r.d below 3000 ' elevation Shall be of the "wet barrel" type. A coml,ination of on-site and off--Site Super fire hydrants. (6" ,, 4" 2- _-1, ) , will be required. 1^c::ted root 125 than 25 ' or. mo_ the is f:"om any portion of the buildi,'—,7( as measured ala ,G appl^: ved traVe 7WayS. The YE "-lid^r•d fire f1 C::J ha 11 be aV'ai table f' -:=rn an'.' 5di: cent hydrant (s) in the system. he required fire flow may be adjusted at a later point in the Term,1t reflect chanoes in Jesi_n, :. onstruction type, are:.: agar bons, lit-in fire protection. measures. or to the application for a building. permit . the deveiop.el`?' : �_.... .. : d tiJp C1 .":5 D: the Yt -'11 2m [J1 d17 , '. +II '. ,'�Un`. _ =(_'•Ci i'tO:En,t for renew. No bui (ding permit Shall be issu,c'_': Unt1l th? _. ap171"o.,_:) " y h,i � !"f:,lnty 1,i '`e . .,. 1. n._:n ,:_pp' ..'� i =iiR; ?Ii . _ lJc . •'t: 1"ned. C�1]c r, JI.'�' -ill .`+E 50'it _ tl7" t.�-17v original will be re . urned. One copy will ,De sent to the responsible ::r•-ding 4uthority. ^1 =n5 shall conform to fire hydrant types, location and spacing. and th- system shall meet the fire flow requirements. Plans shall be signed by a F,c istercd ^ivil Engineer and may be-signed by the local water company wit_.`. the following certification: " I certify that the design of the wat6 step is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Riversid= Canty Fire Department . " Certair, designated areas will be required to be maintained as fire lanes. Install portable fire extinguishers per NFPA . Pamphlet #10, but not ]es r1nF_ in razing. .111 buildings shall be accessible by an all-weather roadway extending tc. * '0 ' of all portions of the exterior walls of the first story. The r-oacluay shall be not less than 24 ' of unobstructed width and 13 ' 6" of ertic_- 1 clearance. . Where -parallel parking is allowed, the roadway shall b 16 ' wide with parking_. on both sides, 32 ' wide with parking on one side . _cads in excess of 150 ' shall be provided with a minimum 45 ' :-ad i s turn,-around (55 ' in industrial developments) . width of interior driveways for multi-family or- apartment -et *;id= wher, serving less than 100 units, no parallel parking; is or garages allowed on one side only. f: ^ ' wide when serving between 100 and 300 units; carports orli g::-ages allowed on both sides, no parallel parking. =.: t wid. when serving over 300 units or when parallel parking is ' allowed on one side. 3f f et wide when parallel parking is allowed on both aides. I:TM_ erar access into private property, is controlled through use of _gates. . . rs. guard houses or similar means, provision shall be made to facilit•ote access by emergency vehicles in a manner approved by the Fire ^epa2-t:ient . All controlled access devices that are power operated shall ha•:e a radio-controlled over-ride system capable of opening the gate wher , ' s_ ' i . atd b} a special transmitter located in emergency vehicles. Device: shall be equipped with backup power facilities to operate in the event Or I-;- < 7 fuiIur All controlled access devices that are not power operate- sha11 a L--c be approved by the Fire Department . Minimum opening width shall :_ ' . :: th a minimum vertical clearance of 13 '6" . Th'F.�': ..' s'reets over 500 ft are not permitted. Provide adequate I2-c_r1^tiDn in those areas. �, nntact the Fire Department for a final inspection prior to occupcncy. A11 questions regarding the meaning of these conditions should be referred ±c the F.re Department Fire Protection/Inspection Staff. Sincerely, GLEN NEWMAN Ranger in Charge Cou ty Fire Chief By Reeder re Protection. Specialist MINUUES PALM DESERT PLAmmu C)OMBTS.SION JAN[ARY 16, 1990 commission and noted a correction to public works condition #12. Staff recommended approval. Cammissicr]er Jonathan asked for and received clarification on the parking space calculations. Chairperson Whitlock asked about one driveway access and another entry with the neighbor or if it was the same. Mr. Gaugush stated that it would be one driveway and an attempt should be made for single access; co mnnity development condition on reciprocal access would help satisfy that condition. Chairperson Whitlock opened the public testimony and asked if the applicant wished to address the commission. MR. CHRIS MILLS, 121 S. Palm Canyon Drive in Palm Springs, stated that he reviewed the conditions and they were fine. He indicated that he was present to answer any questions. Chairperson Whitlock asked if anyone present wished to speak in FAVOR or OPPOSITION to the proposal. There was no one and the public testinxy was closed. Action: Moved by Commissioner Jonathan, seconded by Commissioner Richards, approving the findings as presented by staff. Carried 3-0. Moved by Commissioner Jonathan, seca-ded by Commissioner Richards, adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 1416, approving PP 89- 32, subject to conditions as amended. Carried 3-0. F. Case No. TT 24632 (Revision #1) - LUNDIN IEVEXCR w Co., Arrant Request for approval of a tentative tract map subdividing 77.8 gross acres into 176 single family lots and 2 additional lots set aside for 213 future apartment units at the southwest corner of Portola Avenue and Country Club Drive. Mr. Smith outlined the salient points of the staff report. He explained that the map identified the lots targeted for two story units. ' He informed commission that architectural commission granted preliminary approval, but wanted height limits of 18 feet for single story and the two story unit shown as unit #4 would change from 27 feet in height to 24 feet or less. He noted that in the conditions of approval in the resolution the specific lot numbers were listed 6 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLAMUM COWMICN JANUARY 16, 1990 that would allow two story units and that prospective buyers would be advised of the two story locations and developer would provide evidence of same to the city. Mr. Smith recommended approval subject to these conditions. Commissioner Jonathan asked if the 18 foot single story height restriction would be applied to all the units; staff indicated they had recommended that for only units next to Casa Blanca, but architectural commission disagreed and felt that all single story units should meet the 18 foot requirement. Commissioner Jonathan asked .if the conversion from public to private streets would eliminate the sidewalks or front yards. Mr. Smith replied front yards, noting that this would be a gated community. Commissioner Jonathan felt there could be some safety hazards--staff stated that was considered, but did not feel it was any different from the Lakes or Monterey Country Club and indicated this appeared to work there. O mmissio]er Jonathan asked if the requirement for sidewalk would reduce the lot size and size of the home; Mr: Gaugush informed cam assiom that there would be pedestrian easements across the fronts of the properties, but would not be taken from the property itself so it would remain the same square footage. Chairperson Whitlock opened the public testimony and asked if the applicant wished to address the o mussicn. MR. BRAD BOE, Watt Industries, P.O. Box 2026 in Palm Springs, stated that Sheryl Covey, Bob Vatcher and Herb Lundin were also present. He indicated that off the two major boulevards there would be a wider street section and they would install a sidewalk there, but inside the gate there would not be sidewalks because it would be in a controlled situation. Commissioner Richards stated that he had cancers with two story, especially when it abuts, adjoins or is close to one story units. Mr. Boe stated that one of the major reasons for offering the two story units was having a larger hone and using less lot coverage; he also felt it would set a nice tome to the street scene with up and down roof lines. Mr. Boe stated that there was an existing eight fart fence and a row of trees to help mitigate height impacts next to Casa Blanca and indicated that the grade would be raised between two and six feet, but they would not infringe upon the privacy of any of the neighbors. Commissioner Richards noted one location on the map that had a single story unit surrounded by two story. MS. SHERYL CONEY informed Commission from the marketing studies done on people who purchase hones, this was not a deterrent to 7 MLNMES PALM DFSERr PLAMDU COMMION JANUARY 16, 1990 then. She stated that in a desert erAircnnent (i.e. Arizona) with smaller lot sizes, larger units needed and better use of backyards, this type of development was needed and as long as they are informed up front there is single story next to two story, there was a market demand for the two story hones. Commissioner Richards disagreed, but felt that if there were two story homes, they should be with other two story hones instead of overlooking someone else's backyard. Mr. Diaz indicated that the developer would be taking the risk--if no one wanted to buy next to a two story hone, there would be a self-built growth control because the units wouldn't sell. He also indicated that the two story hones would not be visible from the streets and all prospective home buyers would be notified. Commissioner Jonathan felt there was a need for two story and felt the project could be done right, but felt they were sprinkled capriciously and asked if the applicant had considered putting two story units along the western perimeter or along the northern perimeter next to the apartments to be less offensive neighbors. Ms. Covey stated that they had given that some consideration, but because of the streetscape, they felt it would be more architecturally pleasing to the interior of the development if it were sprinkled. Commissioner Jonathan felt that with a little creativity a more aesthetic streetscape could be achieved. Ms. Covey stated that if the two story units do not sell, they have the opportunity of putting single story units where two story units were recommended. Chairperson Whitlock asked how many phases of construction there would be and M. Covey replied four. M. Covey clarified for commission that there was an agreement with Mr. Lundin to build the residential lots and were totally separate from the apartment units. Ms. Covey suggested that commission see the quality of units that they had built at Desert Princess. Mr. Hoe informed commission that in the first two phases of 85 units, the majority of the two story units abut the proposed apartment site and the difference in grade between the proposed apartment site and the new units was 10 to 12 feet and felt that this mitigated the privacy problems. Chairperson Whitlock asked if anyone present wished to speak in FAVOR or OPPOSITION to the project. 8 MIIdIRFS PAIM DESERT PI,AkZUM Oa IIMION JANLPM 16, 1990 MR. MOGAFRII G, 41517 Armo netts Court, asked for and received clarification that there would only be single story units next to Casa Blanca. He noted that Mr. Boe had stated that they own the 15 feet. past the wall. He stated that at the last homeowners association meeting he was led to believe that Casa Blanca owned that property and the existing trees. Mr. Diaz stated that his understanding was that the wall was the property line. Mr. Diaz informed Mr. McCafring that a survey would have to be done to prove where the property line exists. Mr. Boe informed crnmissicn that they proposed to leave in the trees and put them on some type of irrigation system. Chairperson Whitlock noted that those trees would be in someone's backyard after the project was constructed. Chairperson Whitlock closed the public testimony. After further discussion, commission determined that the two story development should be limited to lots as delineated on the revised tentative map as lot #'s 1-22, 107-118, 124-125, and 136, with staff to have authority to make minor modifications to approval provided it adheres to the commission's philosophy regarding two story development. Action: Moved by Commissioner Jonathan, seconded by Commissioner Richards, approving the findings as presented by staff. Carried 3-0. Moved by Crnmissicner Jonathan, seconded by Cmudssicner Richards, adapting Planning Cknmissicn Resolution No. 1417, approving TT 24632 Revision #1, subject to conditions as amended. Carried 3-0. G. Case No. CLIP 90-1 - MUM M. M3R EY, Applicant Request for approval of a conditional use permit for a 2942 square foot expansion of an existing commercial building and elimination of eight parking spaces at 73-446 Highway 111. Mr. Drell outlined the salient points of the staff report. Staff recommended approval. Chairperson Whitlock opened the public testimony and asked if the applicant wished to address the coamissicn. 9 CITY OF PALM DESERT DEPARTNINP OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 4 STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission DATE: January 16, 1990 CASE NO: TT 24632 (Revision #l)' REQUEST: Approval of a tentative tract map subdividing 77.8 gross acres into 176 single family lots and 2 additional lots set aside for 213 future apartment units at the southwest corner of Portola Avenue and Country Club Drive. APPLICANT: Lundin Development, Co. Watt Industries 23501 Park Sorrento, Suite 207 Palm Springs Inc. Calabasas, CA 91302 P.O. Box 2026 Palm Springs, CA 92263 V/S Associates 42-280 Beacon Hill, Suite D-1 Palm Desert, CA 92260 I. BACKGROUND: In June and July, 1989, TT 24632 was before commission for approval of 169 minilmnn 8,000 square foot single family lots and 2 remainder lots set aside for 220 future apartment units. This map was approved by comnission at its July 5, 1989 meeting. The original map provided for public streets (56' and 60' rights of way) and compliance with R-1 zone standards (i.e. : single story and 20' front yard, 15' rear yard and total 14' total side yard minimum of 5' ). In order to create a more marketable product the applicant has submitted this revised map which proposes to create a gated community utilizing private streets (36' right of way) and thereby effectively enlarging each lot by 10' to 14' in depth and 800 square feet to 1200 square feet in area. The larger lots permit larger hones to be built. II. REVIEW OF REVISED PLAN: A. DESCRIPTION OF SITE: The site is a vacant 78 +/- acre property which slopes from north to south. B. ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE: North: Residential/Palm Desert Greens South: PR-5/Casablanca East: PR-4/Silver Sands Rao3uet Club West: AHDPR-22/San Tropez Apartments STAFF REPORT TT 24632 REVISION #1 JANUARY 16, 1990 C. ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: The site is zoned PR-5, five dwelling units per acre and the general plan designation is residential low density (3-5 dwelling units per acre). The zoning is consistent with the general plan. D. ZONING: The property is zoned PR-5, five units per acre. The plan as submitted is unique in that it proposes a total of 389 dwelling units split between 3.90 units per acre detached single family subdivision (176 units on 45 acres) and a 7.6 units per acre apartment complex (213 units on 27.9 acres). The PR zone allows density to be determined based on gross acreage and hence the total of 389 permitted dwelling units (77.8 acres x 5 units per acre). III. PROJECT LAYOUT AND DESIGN• The apartment section and the single family portion are each provided with one access onto Portola Avenue and there is one access onto Country Club. The north-south access street into the single family area aligns with the existing signalized intersection and entry to Palm Desert Greens to the north. In addition, this north-south street provides access to the apartment complex before the street enters the single family area. While the revised tentative tract map is similar in many ways with the original tentative map it is different in many ways also. The revised map proposes a gated private community using private streets. The revised map increases total number of single family lots to 176 versus the previous 169 single family lots but this 7 unit increase will be offset by an equal reduction in the apartment site units. The total number of units will remain at 389. As a result of designing the map with private streets the lot sizes increase. The actual street width will remain the same (i.e. : 36 feet curb to curb) but the parkway in effect becomes part of the front yard. The revised map also provides for 43 lots to be designated for 2 story homes (43 of 176 lots 24.4%) and those 43 lots are specified on the tentative map. It should be noted that 44 lots were requests, however staff recommended and the applicant agreed to delete the request from lot 86 in that it is a flag lot and could negatively impact several adjacent 2 STAFF REPORT TT 24632 REVISION #1 JANUARY 16, 1990 lots. Commission should also note that the lots adjacent to Casa Blanca to the south will not have two story units. The two story units will be sited well within the development and adjacent to an existing two story project (San Tropez Villas). The applicant has submitted preliminary architectural plans for the four models which are proposed. These plans will be reviewed by architectural review commission January 9, 1990 and the results will be reported to planning commission. In addition to the two story nature of the elevations the architectural plans are unique in that they propose 22-23 foot high single story homes and a 27 foot high two story model. While the architecture is attractive staff recommended to the architectural review commission that the single story units adjacent to Casa Blanca be limited to 18 feet in height in that those were the standards imposed on that development. As well, there will be a grade difference between the properties with this site being from 2' to 6' above the adjacent Casa Blanca. While this grade difference cannot be avoided the height of the units can be controlled. This property is zoned PR-5. Section 25.24.190 permits commission to impose such conditions it deems necessary to carry out the general purpose of the section. Typically commission has imposed the basic R-1 standards when a single family subdivision is proposed in the PR zone. The R-1 standards are as follows: R-1 Standards Minimum lot area 8000 square feet Minimum lot width 70 feet Minimum lot depth none Minimum dwelling unit size 1000 square feet Maximum height 18 feet Maximum coverage limit 35% Minimum front yard 20 feet Minimum rear yard 15 feet Minimum side yard Total 14 feet-minimum 5 feet Minimum street side yard 10 feet The 176 lots as proposed conform to the minimum required lot area, lot width and lot depths as prescribed in the ordinance. The applicant is seeking permission to retain all of the R-1 standards except the height limit. The applicant wishes to use the height limit of the base PR zone which is 30 feet/2 story maximum. 3 STAFF REPORT TT 24632 REVISION #1 JANUARY 16, 1990 IV. ANALYSIS: A. FINDINGS NEEDED FOR APPROVAL OF THE TENTATIVE TRACT MAP: 1. That the proposed map is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. Justification: The proposed map is consistent with the zoning and the zoning is consistent with the general plan. Compliance with the conditions and mitigation measures will assure consistency with the general plan. 2. That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with applicable-general and specific plans. Justification: All public streets will be dedicated and improved and sufficient drainage facilities will be provided in conformance with the general plan guidelines and city ordinances. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the type of development. Justification: The 77.8 acre site is of sufficient size to accommodate the proposed project and the topography of the site does not create significant problems. 4. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development. Justification: The design of the project indicates that the site is suitable for the proposed density of development because the site can be served by respective utilities and, as conditioned, to provide full traffic circulation and is designed in compliance with all city codes. 5. The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. Justification: The design will not cause substantial environmental damage or injure fish or wildlife or their habitat because it will be 4 STAFF REPORT TP 24632 REVISION #1 JANUARY 16, 1990 constructed in compliance with applicable regulations and the proposed negative declaration has determined that there will be no related adverse environmental effect which cannot be mitigated. 6. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems. Justification: The design will not cause serious public health problems because it will be in compliance with applicable health, safety and building codes. 7. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. Justification: There has been an easement acquired by the public at large for access or use of property within the proposed subdivision. The easement is no longer deemed necessary and will be removed by means of a quit claim. 8. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not restrict solar access to the property. Justification: The project has been designed to conform to code requirements and will not impact solar access to adjacent properties and will provide adequate solar access to this property. V. CONCLUSION• The applicant is seeking approval of 176 single family lots of which 43 would be designated for two story units. In addition the applicant wishes to be subject to the R-1 standards for setbacks and coverage but utilize the PR-5 height limit. The architectural commission has reviewed plans for the models and has granted preliminary approval subject to all single story units being a maximum of 18 feet in height and these two story units being reduced in height proportionally (i.e. 27 feet down to the 23-24 foot range). 5 STAFF REPORT TT 24632 REVISION #1 JANUARY 16, 1990 Staff feels that the proposed map and units as approved by ARC are acceptable. The two story units are within a gated commulity on private streets and have a generous setback from existing single story developments (Casa Blanca 210 feet and Silver Sands 240 feet). The units adjacent to Casa Blanca will be redesigned and will not exceed 18 feet in height. VI. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The director of community development has determined that the proposed project will not have a significant effect on the environment and a negative declaration of environmental impact has been prepared. VII. RECCMENIDATION• A. Adoption of the findings. B. Adoption of Planning Commission Resolution No. approving TT 24632 Revision #1, subject to conditions. VIII ATTACHMENTS: A. Draft resolution. B. Legal notice. C. Negative declaration. D. Plans and exhibits. Prepared by Reviewed and Approved by SRS/tm 6 PLANNING QNMISSION RESOLli`PION ND. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the commission in this case. 2. That it does hereby approve the above described Tentative Tract Map No. TT 24632 for the reasons set forth in this resolution and subject to the attached conditions. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Camtissicn, held on this 16th day of January, 1990, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: CAROL WHITLOCK, Chairperson ATTEST: RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary SRS/tm 2 PLANNIM COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CONDITICNS OF APPROVAL CASE NO. TT 24632 Department of Community Developmnent/Plarming: 1. The development of the property shall conform substantially with exhibits on file with the department of community development/planning, as modified by the following conditions. 2. Construction of a portion of said project shall commence within one year from the date of final approval unless an extension of time is granted; otherwise said approval shall become null, void and of no effect whatsoever. 3. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein which are in addition to all municipal ordinances and state and federal statutes now in force, or which hereafter may be in force. 4. Prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contemplated by this approval, the applicant shall first obtain permits and/or clearance from the following agencies: Coachella Valley Water District Palm Desert Architectural Commission City Fire Marshal Public Works Department Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to the department of building and safety at the time of issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. 5. That any future development on the remainder Phase 5 parcels, for a total of up to 213 apartment units, is subject to the city first approving a precise plan of design for same. 6. That the applicant submit and receive approval of the architectural review commission of a landscape and wall plan to be installed with each phase. 7. That development on the apartment site (lots 170 and 171) shall be limited to a maximum height of 24 feet for pitched roofs and 22 feet for flat roofs. 8. As part of development of phase I, the streetscape along Portola Avenue including the masonry wall, landscaping, and sidewalk will be completed. 3 e PLANNDU 0CMUSSIGN RESOLUTIGN NO. 9. The Portola entrance to the remainder parcel will be walled off until development of the site is commenced. 10. Developer will construct a raised median and landscaping on Portola Avenue in keeping with city standards and will agree to join an assessment district formed under the 1972 Lighting and Landscape Maintenance Act. 11. Development on the remainder parcel shall be as shaven on site plans and elevation dated June 20, 1989 and on file with the department of ccmmnuii.ty development, a reduction of which is attached hereto as exhibit B. 12. All development on the remainder parcel shall conform to the Portola "sight line" exhibit on file with the community development department, a reduction of which is hereto attached as exhibit C. 13. That the gated entries be designed to provide a minimum of four car stacking (i.e. waiting to enter) and provide turn around for rejected vehicles. 14. That two story development shall be limited to a maximum of 43 lots as delineated on the revised tentative map as lot #Is 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 17, 19, 20, 22, 28, 30, 32, 59, 67, 72, 75, 79, 107, 108, 111, 112,- 115, 117, 118, 125, 127, 130, 132, 136, 142, 146, 150, 157, 159, 161, 164, 170, 171, 174. 15. That on lots adjacent to the Casa Blanca development (lot #Is 41 through 54 inclusive and lots 90 through 105 inclusive) the maximum building height shall be 18 feet. 16. That on lots 1 through 39 inclusive, 55 through 89 inclusive and 106 through 177 inclusive the maximise building height shall be as determined by Architectural Review Commission in its review and approval of the model units. 17. That all lots shall comply with the setback and coverage requirements prescribed for the R-1 zone, section 25.16.050. 18. That the developer agree to notify purchasers of all single story units located adjacent to, or across the street from proposed two story units that a two story home is proposed on the lot or lots adjacent or across the street therefrom. Said notice to be in a form acceptable to the city. Said form to be signed by the purchaser prior to close of escrow and copy of same to be filed by the seller (developer) with the cit y within 10 days of close of escrow. Failure of seller (developer) to file said notice with the city within 10 days of close of escrow may result in delays in processing of future phases. 4 PLANNING OU4 IISSION RESOLUTION NO. Department of Public Works: 1. Drainage fees, in accordance with Section 26.49 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code and Palm Desert Ordinance Number 507, shall be paid prior to recordation of final map. 2. Drainage facilities shall be provided, per Ordinance No. 218 and the Northside Area Drainage Master Plan, to the specifications of the director of public works. 3. Storm drain construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study prepared by a registered civil engineer that is reviewed and approved by the department of public works prior to start of construction. 4. Signalization fees, in accordance with City of Palm Desert Resolution Nos. 79-17 and 79-55, shall be paid prior to recordation of final map. 5. Full public improvements, as required by Sections 26.40 and 26.44 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code, shall be installed in accordance with applicable city standards. 6. As required under Palm Desert Municipal Code Section 26.28, and in accordance with Section 26.28, and in accordance with Sections 26.40 and 26.44, complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted to the director of public works for checking approval before construction of any improvements is ccmmmenced. Offsite improvement plans to be approved by the public works department and a surety posted to guarantee the installation of required offsite improvements prior to recordation of final map. Such offsite improvements shall include, but not be limited to, curb and gutter, asphalt paving and concrete sidewalk in an appropriate size and configuration and provisions for deceleration lanes at the all project entry points. "As-built" plans shall be submitted to, and approved by, the director of public works prior to acceptance of the improvements by the city. 7. Improvement plans for water and sewer systems shall be approved by the respective service districts with "as-built" plans submitted to the department of public works prior to project final. 8. All public improvements shall be inspected by the department of public works and a standard inspection fee shall be paid prior to issuance of grading permits. 9. Landscaping maintenance on Country Club Drive shall be provided by the hcmeowners association. 10. Waiver of access to Country Club Drive except at approved locations shall be granted on the final map. 5 PLANNING COT4ISSICN RESOLUTION NO. 11. In accordance with Palm Desert Nhuiicipal Code Section 26.44, complete grading plans and specifications shall be submitted to the director of public works for checking and approval prior to issuance of any permits. 12. In accordance with the Circulation Network of the City of Palm Desert's General Plan, installation of one-half landscaped median island in Country Club Drive shall be provided. A cash payment in lieu of actual installation may be submitted at the option of the director of public works. 13. Traffic safety striping on Country Club Drive and Portola Avenue shall be provided to the specifications of the Director of Public Works. A traffic control plan must be submitted to, and approved by, the director of public works prior to the placement of any pavement markings. 14. Frill improvements of interior streets based on residential street standards in accordance with Section 26.40 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code shall be provided. 15. Complete tract map shall be submitted as required by ordinance to the director of public works for checking and approval and be recorded before issuance of any permits. 16. Any and all offsite improvements shall be preceded by the approval of plans and the issuance of valid encroachment permits by the departrment of public works. 17. A complete preliminary soils investigation, conducted by a registered soils engineer, shall be submitted to and approved by the department of public works prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 18. Pad elevations, as shown on the tentative map are subject to review and modification in accordance with Chapter 27 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code. 19. As required under Section 12.16 and Section 26.44 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code, all existing utilities shall be undergrounded per each respective utility districts recommendation. If determined to be unfeasible, applicant shall agree to participate in any future utility undergrounding district. 20. As required by Sections 26.32 and 26.40 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code, and in accordance with the Circulation Network of the City's General Plan, dedication of half-street right-of-way at 55 feet on Country Club Drive and 50 feet on Portola Avenue shall be provided on the final map. 21. Traffic analysis to be prepared for this project to address the specific impacts on existing circulation network (streets and intersections) as 6 PLANNING COKaSSION RESOLUTION NO. well as proposed street/intersection configuration. The report shall include specific mitigation measures and shall be reviewed and approved by the public works department prior to the approval of the final map or issuance of any permits associated with the project. 22. All required offsite improvements for this project shall be installed in accordance with the following schedule: Phase 1: All Portola Avenue improvements Phase 2: Interior connector street-Portola Avenue to Country Club Drive including necessary traffic signal modifications Phase 3: All Country Club Drive improvements including undergrounding of overhead utilities The balance of the required improvements shall be installed with the related phase of development. 23. The existing traffic signal located at Country Club Drive and Palm Greens Parkway shall be modified to accommodate the proposed four leg intersection. 24. Applicant shall agree to contribute their fair share to the assessed costs for the Cook Street Extension and Bridge Fluid. Riverside County FSre 1. The fire department is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commercial buildings per Uniform Fire Code Sec. 10.301C. 2. Provide or show there exists a water system capable of providing a potential fire flow of 2500 gpm and the actual fire flow available from any one hydrant connected to any given water main shall be 1500 gpm for 2 hours duration at 20 psi residual operating pressure, for apartment area. Provide a water system for the residential area that provides 1500 gpm fire flow (must be available from any one hydrant). 3. A fire flow of 1500 gpm for a 2 hour duration at 20 psi residual operating pressure must be available before any combustible material is placed on the job site. 4. The required fire flow shall be available from a Super hydrant(s) (6" x 4" x 2-1/2" x 2-1/2"), located not less than 25' nor more than 150' from any portion of the building(s) as measured along approved vehicular travelways. Hydrants installed below 3000' elevation shall be of the "wet barrel" type. PLANNIM C M IISSION RFSOLUTIM NO. 5. A combination of on-site and off-site Super fire hydrants, (6" x 4" x 2- 1/2" x 2-1/2"), will be required, located not less than 25' or more than 150' from any portion of the building(s) as measured along approved vehicular travelways. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. 6. The required fire flow may be adjusted at a later point in the permit process to reflect changes in design, construction type, area separations, or built-in fire protection measures. 7. Prior to the application for a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and two copies of the water system plan to the county fire department for review. No building permit shall be issued until the water system plan has been approved by the county fire chief. Upon approval, the original will be returned. One copy will be sent to the responsible inspecting authority. 8. Plans shall conform to fire hydrant types, location and spacing, and the system shall meet the fire flow requirements. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and may be signed by the local water company with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Riverside Country Fire Depardnent." 9. Certain designated areas will be required to be maintained as fire lanes. 10. Install portable fire extinguishers per NFPA, Pamphlet #10, but not less than 2AlOBC in rating. 11. All buildings shall be accessible by an all-weather roadway extending to within 150' of all portions of the exterior walls of the first story. The roadway shall be not less than 24' of unobstructed width and 131611 of vertical clearance. Where parallel parking is allowed, the roadway shall be 36' wide with parking on both sides, 32' wide with parking on one side. Dead-end roads in excess of 150' shall be provided with a minimum 45' radius turn-around (55' in industrial developments). 12. The minimum width of interior driveways for multi-family or apartment complexes shall be: a. 24 feet wide when serving less than 100 units, no parallel parking; carports or garages allowed on one side only. b. 28 feet wide when serving between 100 and 300 units; carports or garaged allowed on both sides, no parallel parking. C. 32 feet wide when serving over 300 units or when parallel parking is allowed on one side. 8 PLANNING CU44MION RESOLUTION NO. d. 36 feet wide when parallel parking is allowed on both sides. 13. Whenever access into private property is controlled through use of gates, barriers, guard houses or similar means, provision shall be made to facilitate access by emergency vehicles in a manner approved by the fire department. All controlled access devices that are power operated shall have a radio-controlled over-ride system capable of opening the gate when activated by a special transmitter located in emergency vehicles. Devices shall be equipped with backup power facilities to operate in the event of power failure. All controlled access devices that are not power operated shall also be approved by the fire department. Minimum opening width shall be 12' with a minimum vertical clearance of 13'6". 14. Dead-end streets over 500 feet are not permitted. Provide adequate circulation in those areas. 15. Contact the fire department for a final inspection prior to occupancy. SRS/tm 9 - - -- . ..,. --N+w _ CO!/MQY CLUB OR/VE _ j 36_Q/_N+ •<' _-•i vlEuf I (f�LM OFSERT 6RFFN5f ����—� - - / RFN1A[ L > � z�• �.p " .rye:: .W +c, �. �y 4 '^'� b� � �� --i .. ^' , � • , y .rye J v�:.'r�'wio-.5P � lei. 'mIm �•_ O � �PEQE C �Na.t„\a K l 'g � 41 I' 24,-� 7+ - `• ��glCQ .ter.'- . ``}[[ zs - - N 1-1 +-f`�al 21 n # .4- I YID EXHIBIT B I --�- _ .,ALi=Od= , i • td /KC�!'DKi`f ON /cf I.N6 OP Sea - re csr�sen-r a, ro-:n+ r EXHIBIT, (+. CASL vo. E+`1PIFt0.l3lTaz, SERVICES DEP IYITIAL S=y T' EYi VIAO � �, EVALUATI011 C3EC'=IST NOTE: The availability of data necessary to address the topics listed below shall form the basis of a decision as to whether the application assessment. is considered complete for purposes of environmental 0VIRCUM ENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and mm "maybe" answers, possible mitigation measures and comments are provided on attached sheets) . Yes Maybe No 1 • Earth. Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? — _ — b. Oisruptions, displacements , compaction, or overcovering of the sail ? — — — c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? d. The destruction, covering, or modification Of any unique geologic or physical features? _ r/ e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors7 r/ C. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? i Z, 3, Water. Will the proposal result in: Y_ No a_, Changes. in currents, 'or the course or l '- direction of water' movements? r' b. Changes in-abs e patterns, or the rate and-amointiofge surface water runoff? c. Alterations to the course or flow of I/ flood waters? / d. Alteration of.the direction or rate of v flow of ground waters? e. Change in the quantity of ground waters either trough direct a , dditions or with,drawals, or trough interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? f. Reduction in the amount of water other- fC wise available for public water supplies? _ d. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of plants crocluding trees , shrubs , grass , and b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, • or endangered species of plants? c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area , or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? 5. Animal. Life. Will ,the Proposal result in: l/ a. Changes in the diversity of species, or - - numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles , or insects)? b; Reduction of the numbers of any •unique, rare, or endangered species of animals? c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d. Oeteriaration to existing wildlife habotat? /� c . z 3. Wa_t�, Will the proposal result in: Y_ maybeNa a_. Changes. in currents, 'or the cours 1 ' direction of water movements? e ar r` b. Changes in-absorptjdn rates patterns, or the rate and- amountiofQe surface water runoff? C. Alterations to the ow of flood waters? course or {l / d. Aiteration Of-the direction or rate of v now of ground waters? e. Chitheange in the quantity of ground waters, er through direct additions or with- drawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? f- Reduction in the amount of water other- wise available for public water supplies? 4• Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of plants cm psuding trees, shrubs , grass , and b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or endangered species of plants? , C. Introduction of new species of plants into re re area, or in a barrier to the normal plenishment of existing species? 5. Animal. life. Will ,the proposal result in• _ a. Changes in the diversity of species, or - _ numbers of any species of animals (birds,land animals including reptiles, or insects)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or endangered species of animals? c. Introduction of new species of animals Into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration to existing wildlife habitat? 3. 6. Naturai Resources. Y'_ MaYbe Will the proposal result in: Plo a. Increase in :-Vie rate of use of any natural resources? b. Depletion of any non-renewable natural (� resource? 7. Enercy. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? b. Demand LIZ upon existing sources of energy, ar re- quire the.deselopment of new sources of energy? / 8. Risk of Uoset. - • Does the propasai involve a v_ risk a an explosion Or the release of , hazardous substances to, pesticid (including, but not limited es, oil , chemicals, or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? 9. E�ono_nn= LDS. Will the Proposal result in: a. change in i •t:he value of property and nProvements endangered by flooding? / b• A change in the value of property and impro•,ements exposed to geologic hazards beyond accepted .Co,., nity risk standards? 10. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels to the Point at which accepted Co•rmunity noise and vibration levels are exceeded? / li. Land Use. Wiil .the proposal result in the a t7 eon of the present developed or planned land use of an area? 12. Ooen Soace. Will the proposal lead to a decrease in the �emount of designated open space? 13. Poou�ian Will the proposal result in: a. Alteration or the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human Population of the Citv? b. Change in the population distribution by age, income, religion, racial , or ethnic group, occupational class , household type? 4. ` Yes May be No 14. Emolovment. Will the proposal result in additions . new long-term gobs provided, or a change in the number and per cant employed, unemployed, and underemployed? / 15. Housinc. Will the proposal result in: 1L a. Change in number and per cent of housing units by type (price or rent range, zoning categ , and etc. ) relative to demand corptod number eofal , families in various income classes in the City? b. Impacts on existing housing or creation of a demand for additional housing? f 16. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a. Generation of additional vehicular movement? r� _ b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? c. Impact upon existing transportation systems? d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? e. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , bicyclists, or pedestrians? 17. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or resu 7 in a need for, new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? b. Police protection? _ ✓ c. Schools? d. Parks or other recreational facilities? _ -S✓L e. Maintenance of public facilities , including / roads? ✓ f. Other governmental services? a. Yes Maybe No 14. Emoloyment. Will the Proposal result in — addttiona new long-term jobs provided, or a change in the number and per cant employed, unemployed, and underemployed? / 15. HousinO. Will the proposal result in: lL a. Change in number and per cent Of housing units by type (price or rent range, zoning category, owner-Occupied and rental , etc. ) relative to demand or to number of families in various income classes in the City? b. Impacts on existing housing or creation of a demand for additional housing? 16. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal resu t tn: a. Generation of additional vehicular movement? r� b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? _ — c. Impact upon existing transportation systems? d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation — or movement of people and/or goods? e. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists, or pedestrians? 17. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for, nl!w or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? - — b. Police protection? _ ✓ c. Schools? d. Parks or other recreational facilities? _ J� e. Maintenance of public facilities , including / roads? f. Other governmental services? �/ 18. P_Tic Fiscal Balance. Y_ Martaa No result in a net than Will the proposal flow (revenues less ce in government fiscal and annualized capitalAerating expenditures expenditures)? 19. Utilities _ neednew Will the proposal result in a followingsystems , or alterations to the utilities: a. Power or natural gas? ~ b• Communications system? tem.� — r/ Y — c. Water? — d. Sewer or septic tanks? e. Storm wat er drainage? — f Solid wast e and disposal? 20. HumaHuma-1th Wi 11 the Proposal result in: a. The creation of any health hazard or Potential health hazard? b. A change in the level community v care provided? of y health ' Zi. Social Se riices, _ an increased demandtforll the proposal result in social services? Provision of general 22. Aesthetics _ �• Will the Proposal result in: a. obstruction of an — u any vista open to the , or vie Public? w • b. The creation of an aesthetically r site open to public view? . Y offensive c. Lessening of the overall (or area — attractiveness neighborhood and uniqueness? Pleasantness, 23. Licht and Glare. Will v ne:v the r �gnt or g are? Proposal produce 24. ArcheoiocicaT/Historical , Will the — resu t in archeological an a teTatIo of a or historical site, structure,significant Object, or building? _ / 6. Les Maybe No 25. Mandatory Findings of significance. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment or to curtail the diversity in the environment? b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental .goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future. ) / C. Does the project have impacts which are indi- vidually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small , but where the effect of the total of those impacts an the environment is significant. ) d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human be either directly or indirectly? (/ Initial Study Prepared By: e 6. Y_ Maybe No 25. Mandatory Findines of Sioni�icance. a. Oces the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment or to curtail the diversity in the environment? b. Oces the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future. ) / c. Does the project have impacts which are indi- vidually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small , but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant. ) d. Ooes the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings , either directly or indirectly? (/ Initial Study Prepared By: cr� • 1 INITIAL STUDY CASE NO. TT 24632 ENVIROAIIENTAL EVALUATION CHECKLIST CCVVENTS AND POSSIBLE MITIGATION MEASURES (CATEGORIES PERTAIN TO ATTACHED a-IECKLIST) 1. EARTH a. The project will result in grading. Said grading will not result in any alterations to geologic substructures nor create instable earth conditions in that all grading will be pursuant to the grading ordinance. b. As part of the normal grading activity soil will be moved, displaced, over-oovered and compacted. This activity will be cone per permit and approved grading plans to assure that the site is properly prepared for the structural development which will take place on the site. C. The site slopes from north to south and changes in topography and surface relief will be required to assure proper drainage and avoid increased runoff to adjoining properties. The after condition of the property will result in less water runoff from the property to adjoin g properties, and better direction. d. The site does not contain any unique geologic or physical features. e. The project as stated previously will result in less potential water damage to the site, through proper grading resulting in the appropriate directing of runoff from the site. Mitigation Measures The City of Palm Desert grading and building permits procedures require detailed geotechnical reports addressing grading specifications and the settlement and expansive characteristics of on-site soils. All structures must be designed by UBC requirements to insure that the buildings are constructed within the acceptable level of risk set forth therein for the type of building and occupancies being developed. 2. AIR a. During construction, particularly grading, a potential dust problem will be a short-term impact. Requiring that the ground be moistened during days in which grading occurs will mitigate this problem. This is required by City of Palm Desert Grading Ordinance. Because the site is already an urbanized setting its development will not result in an overall deterioration of ambient air quality.. This conclusion is supported by the discussions relating to air quality contained in a 1985 draft environmental impact report prepared for INITIAL STOW TT 24632 the City of Rancho Mirage by Michael Hrandman Associates entitled "Park View Drive Land Use Study". b. The proposed development does not call for any odorous land uses. C. Development of this site will not result in any climatic changes. This is due to its size and identified uses. 3. WATER a. Water will be redirected to drainage facilities designed and constructed to accept the water fran the site. b. The site will absorb less water due to ground coverage. The landscaped areas will absorb water because of the plant material. The alterations in drainage patterns will result in a benefit to adjoining property as it will be directed in a control manner. C. See b. d. There is no ground water present on the site. e. See d. f. While any development results in the use of water and, therefore, reduces the amount otherwise available for public water supplies; the Coachella Valley Water District assures that there is sufficient water supplies to accommodate this growth. 4. PLANT LIFE a. The project when completed will introduce a diversity of species to the site. The plants that will be introduced to the site will, however, be material previously used in the desert. b. The site does not contain any unique, rare or endangered species of plant life. C. It is extremely doubtful that the project will introduce any new species into the area. In any event the landscape plan will be reviewed by the architectural inspector of Riverside County to assure that the plants being used do not pose a hazard to agricultural production in the area. 2 INITIAL STUDY TT 24632 the City of Rancho Mirage by Michael Brandnan Associates entitled "Park View Drive Land Use Study". b. The proposed development does not call for any odorous land uses. C. Development of this site will not result in any climatic changes. This is due to its size and identified uses. 3. WATER a. Water will be redirected to drainage facilities designed and constructed to accept the water from the site. b. The site will absorb less water due to ground coverage. The landscaped areas will absorb water because of the plant material. The alterations in drainage patterns will result in a benefit to adjoining property as it will be directed in a control manner. C. See b. d. There is no ground water present on the site. e. See d. f. While any development results in the use of water and, therefore, reduces the amount otherwise available for public water supplies; the Coachella Valley Water District assures that there is sufficient water supplies to accommodate this growth. 4. PLANT LIFE a. The project when completed will introduce a diversity of species to the site. The plants that will be introduced to the site will, however, be material previously used in the desert. b. The site does not contain any unique, rare or endangered species of plant life. C. It is extremely doubtful that the project will introduce any new species into the area. In any event the landscape plan will be reviewed by the architectural inspector of Riverside County to assure that the plants being used do not pose a hazard to agricultural production in the area. 2 INITIAL STLEY TT 24632 5. ANIMAL LIFE a. The project will not increase or decrease the variety of animal life on the site. b. The site does contain habitat for the fringe-toed lizard, an endangered specie. As mitigation the applicant will be required to pay $600 per acre to the Nature Conservancy for use in acquiring habitat area north of I-10. C. See b and c. d. The project site is an in-fill site and not a suitable habitat for wildlife. 6. NATURAL RESOURCES a. The project will obviously use natural resources, but will not increase the rate of usage of these resources. b. All material resources used on the site are renewable. 7. a. & b. No more than normal usage. In addition, since the project will be required to comply with the most current state energy codes, energy usage will be less than on previous projects of a similar nature. 8. The site does not contain any substances that could result in explosion or escape of hazardous materials. 9. a. As discussed earlier the project will have a positive impact in terms of drainage impacts on adjacent properties. b. Properties in the area are not subject to unusual geologic hazards. The project will not effect that hazard. 10. NOISE Construction and subsequent use as single family dwellings and aparbwnts will increase ambient noise level. The increase will not create a long term annoyance to the adjacent residential` properties. Mitigation Measures . Strict adherence to construction hairs and days will be required. 3 INITIAL STUDY TT 24632 11. LAND USE The project will not alter the present developed land use in the area. The planned land use for the area is identified as low density residential; the project would develop land uses permitted in the low density residential land use designation (5 du/acre). 12. OPEN SPACE The site in question is designated as low density residential; its development, therefore, will not result in a reduction in the amount of designated open space. Park fees collected from this development will be used to purchase park land or develop park land to serve this area. 13. POPULATION a. Developing single family lots and apartments in the area designated low density residential will not result in changes in location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the city's population. b. The project will not generate changes in the socio-economic characteristics of the area. 14. EMPLOYMENT While the project will provide a number of new jobs in terms of the value as a whole, in and of itself, it is minor. Most of the jobs created: gardeners, pool maintenance and other service personnel, however, will be filled by residents of the area or those who have come to the valley for other reasons. 15. HOUSING a. The project will not change the housing picture in the community or region. This is based on the conclusions reached in items 13 and 14. b. None - covered in item 15 a. 16. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION a. Projected trip generation per single family dwelling unit per day is 10 for a total of 'trip ends and 6.1 per unit for apartments for 130v 1222-trips The proposed development then would result in a total of trip ends per day. As part of the conditions of approval the applicant shall be required to provide road improvements as provided by the circulation element of the general plan. 4 INITIAL STUDY TT 24632 11. LAND USE The project will not alter the present developed land use in the area. The planned land use for the area is identified as low density residential; the project would develop land uses permitted in the low density residential land use designation (5 du/acre). 12. OPEN SPACE The site in question is designated as low density residential; its development, therefore, will not result in a reduction in the amount of designated open space. Park fees collected from this development will be used to purchase park land or develop park land to serve this area. 13. POPULATICN a. Developing single family lots and apartments in the area designated low density residential will not result in changes in location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the city's population. b. The project will not generate changes in the socio-economic characteristics of the area. 14. EMPLOYMENT While the project will provide a number of new jobs in terms of the value as a whole, in and of itself, it is minor. Most of the jobs created: gardeners, pool maintenance and other service personnel, however, will be filled by residents of the area or those who have come to the valley for other reasons. 15. HOMING a. The project will not change the housing picture in the oamnmity or region. This is based on the conclusions reached in items 13. anp 14. b. None - covered in item 15 a. 16. nWSPORTATICN/CIRQJLA.TICN a. Projected trip ¢,ern per single family dwelling unit per day is 10 for a total oQ trip ends and 6.1 per unit for apartments for 3pO trip ands. The proposed development then would result in a total of aWtrip ends per day. As part of the conditions of approval the applicant shall be required to provide mad improvements as provided by the circulation element of the general plan. 4 INITIAL STUDY TT 24632 b. All new single family dwellings are required to provide two covered parking spaces as well as on-street and driveway parking. The apartments will be required to provide one covered space/unit and one additional space per unit. C. Except for. additional vehicular movements discussed above the project should not generate additional demands on existing transportation systems. In addition these systems have additional capacity to accept the traffic these projects will create. d. Principal access to the area will be via Portola Avenue and Country Club Drive. e. Implementation of the mitigation measures set forth by item 16a should result in positive impacts. 17. PUBLIC SERVICE a-f. None. The property is presently vacant. A cartnitment to urban uses was made as the area surrounding the study area has been developed, and the general plan and zoning maps designated the area for residential development. Infrastructure improvements (i.e. : streets and utilities) have been made and are adequate to serve the proposed development. The proposed land uses would increase the economic productivity of the land in terms of land efficiency and greater ecomnic return generated from these uses, versus the current state of the land. 18. PUBLIC FISCAL BALANCE The project will result in a net increase on fiscal flaw to the City of Palm Desert through an increase in the assessed value of the land. 19. UTILITIES All utilities have indicated an ability to serve the proposed development. 20. HUMAN HEALTH The project will not create hazard to lxm health in the long or short term nor will it impact the level of community health, 21. SOCIAL SERVICES The property will be developed with single family dwellings and apartments. Owners of these homes and apartments will pay substantial 5 INITIAL STUDY TT 24632 amounts of property tax and generally have a low incidence of use of social services. Any increase in the demand for general social services will be minimal. 22. AESTHETICS a. The city grading ordinance and architectural review process take into account the effects development may have on adjacent properties and the views available from public streets. Care will be taken to assure that any impact on views from adjacent properties or scenic vistas will be minimized. b. The proposed single family dwellings must be approved by the Palm Desert Architectural review process. C. For reasons stated in items 22 a and b. 23. LIGHT AND GLARE a. New light will be produced but the effects will be minimal , 24. There has been no evidence of any archeological or historical significance of this site. In addition, state law requires that should any evidence be found during construction, construction must cease and the site cleared. 25. Because of the mitigation measures identified herein and required of the project, the proposal will not have a significant adverse impact on the environment. /tm 6 INITIAL STLW TT 24632 amounts of property tax and generally have a low incidence of use of social services. Any increase in the demand for general social services will be minimal , 22. AESTHETICS a. The city grading ordinance and architectural review process take into account the effects development may have on adjacent properties and the views available from public streets. Care will be taken to assure that any impact on views from adjacent properties or scenic vistas will be minimized. b. The proposed single family dwellings must be approved by the palm Desert Architectural review process. C. For reasons stated in items 22 a and b. 23. LIGHT AND GLARE a. New light will be produced but the effects will be minimal , 24. There has been no evidence of any archeological or historical significance of this site. In addition, state law requires that should any evidence be found during construction, construction must cease and the site cleared. 25. Because of the mitigation measures identified herein and required of the project, the proposal will not have a significant adverse impact on the environment. /tm 6 INTEROFFICE HKORMUN TO: Department of Community Development/Planning Attention: Steve Smith FROM: Richard J. Folkers, Asst. City Manager/Public Works Director SUBJECT: TENTATIVE TRACT 24632, REVISED--WATT INDUSTRIES DATE: December 29, 1989 The Public Works Department conditions of approval for Tentative Tract 24632 as amended and approved by the Palm Desert Planning Commission shall be considered as conditions of approval for the revised tentative map with the addition of the following revised condition number 22: (22) All required improvements for this project shall be installed in accordance with the following schedule: PHASE 1: ALL PORTOLA AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS PHASE 2: INTERIOR CONNECTOR STREET-PORTOLA AVENUE TO COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE INCLUDING NECESSARY TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATIONS PHASE 3: ALL COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDING UNDERGROUNDING OF OVERHEAD UTILITIES The balance of the required improvements shall be installed with the related phase of development. RICHARD J. FOWKERS, P.E. (ptnapsltr 24632r.iot) Engineering — Planning Surveying Cook Street Business Park 42-280 Beacon Hill , Suite D-1 Palm Desert, CA 92260 (619) 341-1599 FAX (619) 341-1592 December 5, 1989 1989 Mr. Steve Smith TANWIM Planning Department Civic Center 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 Re: Tentative Tract Map No. 24632 (V/S 2-01-07) Dear Mr. Smith-. Following up our submittal this date of the above referenced Tentative Map, and for your further information, we have calculated the following concerning the single family residential. portion of said map (Phases 1 through 4) : Minimum lot size is 8, 000 square feet. Number of lots between 9, 000 and 10, 000 SF = 159 lots (90. 3%) . Number of lots between 10, 000 and 13, 000 SF = 17 lots (9. 7%) . Average lot size for all 176 residential lots = 9, 375 SF. Pursuant to our previous discussion concerning this Tentative Tract it is our understanding that section 25. 16. 050 of the zoning code (development standards for lots less than ten thousand square feet) will be recommended. If there may be anything further you require, or if you have any questions at all , please call us. Very truly yours, Rob a,it C. Vatcher Principal cc: Watt Industries Palm Springs, Inc. ' Lundin Development Company ARCH TECTUR&L REV EW Dept. of Planning and Community Development _i` CHEW oq NAM ilil D a e n 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 Applicant tea+-(please pJS )tic �• �o x 2 OZlP 15ZS- //z( Mailing Address Telephone 'Pq/M r;Ng eq .\ G . 9ZZ4� City. ' State Zip-Coda REQUEST! (Describe specific nature of approval requested). gpPv--ovn I of -hhP de ;!E nM }2164+ Nq S _O 0 �j IC�nry f�IT GtiIS cat lr� I - Z +oti/ J�IA1J ON / 74a In4-1 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: �59c1 es o� K 1- 19 IQf id , (JiViA A ;N4n i2(� ln+s nN - 4k _C-oir--t.let- c� png4tj: -r:6 Oluh Dt- c.NA Pnr-+ep Ig 'Ayc ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. . i(,QZ Z— 0 Z O— U 5 7 4- 0 4 o EXISTING ZONING I - 8 Property Owner Authorization The undersigned states that they are the owner(s) of the property described herein and hereby give author- Izatlon for the filing of this application. Signature or T Agreement absolving the City of Palm Desert of all liabilities relative to any deed restrictions. 1 00 BY MY SIGNATURE ON THIS AGREEMENT, Absolve the City of Palm Desert of all liabilities regarding any dead restrictions that may be applicable to the property described herein. Signature Dath Applicant's Signature /�(J Signature Date (FOR STAFF USE ONLY) Environmental Status. Accepted by: ❑ Ministerial Act E.A. No. ❑ Categorical Exemption CASE �2 I;JI�a ❑ Negative Declaration lCiA E I1Cl Other Reference Case No. CITY OF PALM DFSERr APPLIaMaN FORM Architectural Review Of: Case No. (TYP6 of Project) (Applicant) --------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------- Agreement of compliance to be signed by those applying pp yang for review. I hereby acknowledge that I have read and agree, to comply with all the following requirements, and understand that the Department of Building and Safety will not issue a building permit or allow occupancy on the use permitted until this signed confirmation has been received by the Department of Community Development. The development of this project shall conform substantially to all development plans submitted in behalf of this case, and as revised according to the Architectural Review Commission process. Any minor change requires approval by the Director. of Community Development. Any substantial change requires approval by the Architectural Commission. All requirements of any law, ordinance, or regulation of the State, City and any other applicable government entity shall be complied with as part of the development process. This approval is applicable, subject to the development of this project, commencing within one year from approval date and being promptly completed. Landscaping (with irrigation system) shall be installed prior to final inspection and receiving certificate of occupancy. Curb, gutter, curb cuts and tie-in paving shall be provided along the full frontage of the lot by means of installation prior to final inspection or other provisions as approved by the city engineer. Construction shall conform to city standards and all requirements of the city engineer. All new and existing electrical distribution lines, telephone, cable antenna television, and similar service wires or cables, which are adjacent to and provide service to the property being developed shall be installed underground as a part of development from the nearest existing pole not on the property being developed as required �by municipal code. (,Signature) (Date) 19 e9 V/S ASSOCIATES 42-280 BEACON HILL, STE. D-1 PALM DESERT, CA 92260 SUMMARY OF TRACT 24632-1 AREA LOT 1 8862. 09 SF 0. 20345 AC AREA LOT 2 9746. 25 SF 0. 22374 AC AREA LOT 3 8870. 50 SF 0. 20364 AC AREA LOT 4 8870. 50 SF 0. 20364 AC AREA LOT 5 8023. 00 SF 0. 18418 AC AREA LOT 6 8911. 19 SF 0. 20457 AC AREA LOT 7 8911 . 19 SF 0. 20457 AC AREA LOT 8 8023. 00 SF 0. 18418 AC AREA LOT 9 8870. 50 SF 0. 20364 AC AREA LOT 10 8870. 50 SF 0. 20364 AC AREA LOT 11 9746. 25 SF 0. 22374 AC AREA LOT 12 9978. 48 SF 0. 22907 AC AREA LOT 13 8888. 20 SF 0. 20404 AC AREA LOT 14 11431. 36 SF 0. 26243 AC AREA LOT 15 8006. 86 SF 0. 18381 AC AREA LOT 16 8011 . 81 SF 0. 18393 AC AREA LOT 17 9742. 63 SF 0. 22366 AC AREA LOT 18 9522. 88 SF 0. 21882 AC AREA LOT 19 11835. 00 SF 0. 27169 AC AREA LOT 20 9623. 43 SF 0. 22092 AC AREA LOT 21 9533. 75 SF 0. 21886 AC AREA LOT 22 . 9994. 00 SF 0. 22943 AC AREA LOT 23 9533. 75 SF 0. 21886 AC AREA LOT 24 9533. 75 SF 0. 21886 AC AREA LOT 25 9994. 00 SF 0: 22943 AC AREA LOT 26 9945. 98 SF 0. 22833 AC AREA LOT 27 13223. 49 SF 0. 30357 AC LOT AVERAGE: 9704 S. F. AREA LOT 28 9349. 51 SF 0. 21464 AC (excluding well si#e) AREA LOT 29 9014. 69 SF 0. 20695' AC AREA LOT 30 9878. 12 SF 0. 22677 AC AREA LOT 31 9758. 69 SF 0. 22403 AC AREA LOT 32 8904. 72 SF 0. 20442 AC AREA LOT 33 8869. 21 SF 0. 20361 AC AREA LOT 34 9719. 68 SF 0. 22313 AC AREA LOT 35 8869. 21 SF 0. 20361 AC AREA LOT 36 8504. 72 SF 0. 19524 AC AREA LOT 37 8869. 21 SF 0. 20361 AC AREA LOT 38 9719. 68 SF 0. 22313 AC AREA LOT 39 ! 8504. 72 SF 0. 19524 AC AREA LOT 40 8869. 21 SF 0. 20361 AC AREA LOT 41 8504. 72 SF 0. 19524 AC AREA LOT 42 22527. 93 SF 0. 51717 AC WELL SITE SUBTOTAL 406368. 36 SF 9. 3289 AC SUMMARY OF TRACT 24632-2 AREA LOT 1 . 9809. 75 SF 0. 22520 AC AREA LOT 2 i 9386. 32 SF 0. 21548 AC AREA LOT 3 9825. 02 SF 0. 22555 AC AREA LOT 4 QQA4. QQ sF 0. 22022 AC AREA LOT 5 9985. 05 SF 0. 22923 AC AREA LOT 6 9833. 35 SF 0. 22574 AC AREA LOT 7 9818. 50 SF 0. 22540 AC AREA LOT 8 9818. 50 SF 0. 22540 AC AREA LOT 9 9818. 50 SF 0. 22540 AC ARIA LOT 10 9818: 50 SF 0. 22540 AC AREA LOT 11 9747. 39 SF 0. 22377 AC AREA LOT 12 9735. 08 SF 0. 22349 AC AREA LOT 13 8390. 43 SF 0. 19262 AC AREA LOT 14 . 9969. 84 SF 0. 22888 AC AREA LOT 15 9924. 79 SF 0. 22784 AC AREA LOT 16 9946. 31 SF 0. 22834 AC AREA LOT 17 9999. 03 SF 0. 22955 AC AREA LOT 18 9950. 74 SF 0. 22844 AC AREA LOT 19 9207. 51 SF 0. 21138 AC AREA LOT 20 9720. 06 SF 0. 22314 AC AREA LOT 21 9140. 61 SF 0. 20984 AC LOT AVERAGE: 9655 SF AREA LOT 22 9758. 53 SF 0. 22402 AC AREA LOT 23 9877. 46 SF 0. 22676 AC AREA LOT 24 9363. 74 SF 0. 21496 AC AREA LOT 25 9999. 37 SF 0. 22955 AC AREA LOT 26 8913. 61 SF 0.20463 AC AREA LOT 27 8312. 76 SF 0. 19083 AC AREA LOT 28 8757. 55 SF 0. 20105 AC AREA LOT 29 9957. 81 SF - 0. 22860 AC AREA LOT 30 8956. 18 SF 0. 20S61 AC AREA LOT 31 9930. 66 SF 0. 22798 AC AREA LOT 32 11734. 54 SF 0. 26939 AC AREA LOT 33 9542. 85 SF 0. 21907 AC AREA LOT 34 8426. 40 SF 0. 19344 AC AREA LOT 35 8869. 21 SF 0. 20361 AC AREA LOT 36 8504. 72 SF 0. 19524 AC AREA LOT 37 9969. 63 SF 0. 22887 AC AREA LOT 38 8083. 44 SF 0. 18557 AC AREA LOT 39 9931. 14 SF 0. 22799 AC AREA LOT 40 8404. 06 SF 0. 19293 AC AREA LOT 41 8996. 83 SF 0. 20654 AC AREA LOT 42 13185. 71 SF 0. 3027 AC AREA LOT 43 11561 . 15 SF 0. 26541 AC AREA LOT 44 9982. 69 SF 0. 22917 AC SUBTOTAL 424849. 96 SF 9. 75323 AC RIVERSIDE COUNTY ^LANNING DEPARTMENT } P PROPERTY OWNS_. CERTIFICATION L� LVSA DELEON FIRST AII.48RICAN TITLE INSURANCE I, , certify that on COMPANY DECEMBER 4, 1989 the attached property owners list was prepared by First American Title Insurance Company pursuant to appli- cation requirements furnished by the Riverside County Planning Depart- ment. Said list is a complete and true compilation of owner of the subject property and all other property owners within 300' feet of the property involved in the application and is based upon the latest equalized assessment rolls. I further certify that the information filed is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I understand that incorrect or erroneous information may be grounds for rejection or denial of the application. NAME: LYSA DELEON TITLE REGISTRATION: Customer Service Representative ADDRESS: 3625 Fourteenth Street Riverside, California 92502 PHONE (8-5): (714)-787-1730 SIGNIATURE: DATE: 12/4/8Q CASE: See Attached `0 . ; y,:•ir�r I � .: r: 73-510 FNED WARIHG DRIVE:, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPIIOrJE (619) 340-0G11 REQUESI FOR CONNi:NIS ANO CONU11IONS OF APPROVAL CASE HO(S) e u1r- iT a (/co 3 a PROJECT: f`U"M CtL" S hvW� Ge nPPL. I cnlrr: Enclosed pi ;,.;e find m.)terlals descrlbinq a project for which the following Is being requested: . 1rol0Aou L- or, /4 12evi's#-r� T alGur +K-44 c.;( 1`i(o ay n�Qp f, - hm oO 4&e Q-r t�1v s o u-ref- We S.7' cd2z .✓ p F /m ar 24 v4 the al:l:nr,hed dol:a was prepared by the applicant and is being forwarded to you for conlm^nts and recommended conditions OF approval . the city Is Interested the probable impacts m I on the environment ( including land, air, water, nerals, flora, fauna, nolse, objects of historical or aesthetic significance) ands' conditions of approval based on concern. your expertise and area of YOLIr comments and rerxwunended conditions of approval 'Dust be received by this office prior to 4: 10 p.m. In order to be discussed by the land division connnil.tee. The Iand division conuntttee (comprised of director of comm�mil:y development, city bullding ,officlnl , city engineer, fire mnrshal , and a representative of CVWD ) will discuss the comments and recommended conditions Of npproval anci will forward them to the planning commission through the staff report. Any Info'-DkItlon received by this office after the receipt deaciline will not be discussed by the land division corDmittee. Sincerely, RANON ll I AZ U I RECIOR OF COIIIIUN I TY I)EVI:1.OpMEPII /PLAIIN I NG /Im A1:far.hmeni:s I't r�r•r ht-111,;'I ('^f l!l 111 [.n':':FNfS SUBDIVISION MAP wPPLaCAM®H ®gym: Pganneng dondoa®(M a Lundin Development Comapny Applicant (pease print) 23501 Park Sorrento, Suite 207 Mailing Address (818) 346-1976 Telsphons Calabasas California 91302 Cl ty State Zlp-COde REQUEST! (Describe specific nature of approval requested). Approval for Tentative Tract Map No. 24632 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: The North half of the Northeast quarter of Sectiion 8, Township 5 South, Range 6 East, San Bernardino Base and Meridian, in the Co. of Riverside; Except the Northerl 441 and the Easterly 501 thereof and that portion as granted to the City of Palm Desert by deed recorded March 5, 1986 as instrument No. 51051 an re-recorded Sept. 24, 1986 as Inst. No. 234154, of Official Records. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 622-020-037 & -046 EXISTING ZONING PR-5 Property Owner Authorisation The undersigned states that they are the owner(a) of the property described heroin and hereby give author- Isatlon for the filing of this application. McBail Company (See attached letter dated Nov. 30, 1989 to the City of Palm Desert) --- %^ atwe---.. Date Agreement absoltdnq the City of Palm Desert of all Ilabilihes relative to arty dead restnctlons. 1 DO BY MY SIGNATURE ON THIS AGREEMENT, Abscive the city Of Palm Desert of all liabilities regarding any deed restrlctions that may be applicable to the property described herein. McBail Company (See attached letter dated Nov. 30,1989 to the City of Palm Desert) Signature Date Applicants Signature �46L -. y� Signature Date (FOR STAFF USE ONLY) Environmental Status Accepted by: ❑ Ministerial Am E.A. No. ❑ Categorical Exemption /.\ (i� ^ Qe _ ❑ Negative Declaration CASE w ❑ Other Reference Case No. rIM1I NCNM 3E"M ai i♦73 $A?-e2 Watt Industries Palm Springs Watt Industries Palm Springe Watt Industries Palm Springs P.O. Box 2026 P.O. Box 2026 P.O. Box 2026 Palm Springs, CA 92263 Palm Springs, CA 92263 Palm Springs, CA 92263 Lundin Development Company Lundin Development Company Lundin Development Company 23501 Park Sorrento, Ste. 207 23501 Park Sorrento, Ste. 207. 23501 Park Sorrento, Ste. 207 Calabasas, CA 91302 Calabasas, CA 91302 Calabasas, CA 91302 V/S Associates V/S Associates V/S Associates 42-280 Beacon Hill, Ste. D-1 42-280 Beacon Hill, Ste. D-1 42-280 Beacon Hill, Ste. D-1 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Desert, CA 92260 I I i I SP0 5, -Rs 1. a_ V/S Associates Eng_neer^ing — Planning — E.__rveyin9 Coo4:: Street Business Park: 42-280 Beacon Hill , Suite 0-1 Palm Desert, CA 92260 (619) 341-1599 FAX (619) 341-1592 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. '34632 List of Parties Directly involved in representing the project. 1. Watt Industries Palm Springs, Inc. (Developer) P.O. Box 2026 Palm Springs, CA 92263 (619) 325-1120 2. Lundin Development Company (Applicant) 23501 Park Sorrento, Suite 207 Calabasas, CA 91302 (818) 346-1976 3. V/S Associates (Engineer) 42-280 Beacon Rill, Suite D-1 Palm Desert, CA 92260 (619) 341-1599 McBAIL COMPANY November 30, 1989 City of Palm Desert Planning Department 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, California 92260 Ref : Tentative Tract Map 24632 AP622-020-037-046 75+ Acres, Southwest Corner, Country Club Drive and Portola Avenue, Palm Desert Gentlemen : Please be advised that as owners of the above-referenced property, Mc Bail has no objection to Mr . Herbert H . Lundin of Lundin Development applying for a Tentative Tract Map ##24632 . We understand Mr. Lundin will pay all fees and costs associated with this application, and we agree to absolve the City of Palm Desert of any liabilities pertaining to any Deed restrictions that may prove applicable to the subject property. Very truly yours, MCBAIL COMPANY a e G r D ector f La d evelopment MRG/sh 3200 DANVILLE BLVD., SUITE 200 ALAMO, CALIFORNIA 94507-1914 P.O. BOX 1056 TELEPHONE 415-838-1460 L73- $ o� OO �s`2 �nII�tII ��72o Qo 510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 December 21 , 1989 CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE CASE NO. TT 24632 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by LUNDIN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY for approval of a tentative tract map for 176 single family lots and 2 additional lots (27.9 acres) for 213 apartment units on the PR-5 zoned property at the southwest corner of Portola Avenue and Country Club Drive, more particularly described as: APN 622-020-037 AND 046 SAID public hearing will be held on Tuesday, January 16, 1990, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber at the Palm Desert Civic Center, 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all interested persons are Invited to attend and be heard. If you challenge the proposed actions in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public_ hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the planning commission (or city council ) at, or prior to, the public hearing. PUBLISH: Desert Post RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary January 5, 1990 Palm Desert Planning Commission 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 December 21 , 1989 CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE CASE NO. TT 24632 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by LUNDIN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY for approval of a tentative tract map for 176 single family lots and 2 additional lots (27.9 acres) for 213 apartment units on the PR-5 zoned property at the southwest corner of Portola Avenue and Country Club Drive, more particularly described as: APN 622-020-037 AND 046 P.R:.-5 . I Palm Desert Greensj —T_ - 1 NORTH- I Fire Station i r =.l , � � I � . , 1 _ ,-country Club Dr _couNrr - � =,.,,. .: "-•-__• c�oe=W: ::ice-�' j Subject Property :_--_,( P.R.-5 P.R.-`22: la,rve/TC Sin[[TSI P.R.I 5 - =ai' - __-w P.R.-4 - I v?\--- _• Fa--•_ —AVEM1 L A N E SAID public hearing will be held on Tuesday, January 16, 1990, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber at the Palm Desert Civic Center, 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. If you challenge the proposed actions in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the planning commission (or city council ) at, or prior to, the public hearing. PUBLISH: Desert Post RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary January 5, 1990 Palm Desert Planning Commission 6 Tq, ^ ���� [�+ POR. NW 114 SEC. 9, . 5 S R. 6 E. ;; SpG° ��'� 624-03 A � (FoR. C/TY OFPALM DES RTJ s,3 .5 @ ° 624-26 53 oo9AC B° qp. ' I T.R.A. /B32 > /9 4lf /5 F x zs p"_ o ao&Ac I 0.09d' b l 5 0/04C 16 m� A ,,. r "Lo/ //3 02 I 2 0 /7 ,� "� 0 4 56 cgAc COMMON' ARE� I ° STONAc 3. Lot In SB9°32'/2�E ,\ il•� 'p B .) o ,o Q2r /^ 0 6 Sp %3 D4 20 I /D � 9 i 0 �y�y) a� 0 v � qo ac. � m. 9n, ao- t 3600094C � h s0 `-� ® b� `eS- 3/ 32 33 34 35 p 0 ai. m m P s /00 606O° ° ° V 7/ 09ACO90 0 n 4 `ya O p 'V 0.09AC O.IOAC 0/0 AC 0.09AC 0.09AC oT- �L O./24C o G '� 22 40° 6/ /O �I 1m ° 3B T2 o./o4co I 0/2 4 8/3 0 W /4 % i _ "A 29so• N A` alzr o © ,\24`: a ` 39 T3 oo9Ac c - o.ro4c COMMON AREA O g 2 25 o c /'9 - i°I K Lot /09 n.4�. mm W ]' WryI . OO 2B c °27 3 26 c ,n ! .6' p �•IDB s w 3 a ° 40 T4 O./04C 45 ^¢I 1N 4.4OAc' //.L) Common Lot 49 'pG ao \ 5/ `c r� 0 r �$ 4/ 00.09X 4 44 9 \ .46 2 o cr cn' 29 456 AC M. ° ��.v' ° \ o r,... 21 � ao'. <e� <p� b 42 *WAWV0ZA Q 43 s 48o 47 . 46 o° 45 5 3 @ O30 oOa •o r./i n o�. MIADN O hl FIREA ' B w Q \ „�— 3 47 O /.^` � \� m o/oac o./o4c a09AC 0.094C ac � ^�,q�.Lot 107 c h\ °O 7 ° \ ,,,..' �a 4/ x v `� Common Lot4B \ 3 °O /0_.s - 32 V° G7 l� ° /N ° c� ILO/ F PA &WE e r ,• v 9O 4� S r Lot ✓ I �q N 45 o y NB9^sT OB••6 l�D.:_6• A. °y /� 5 w /3 p a°.of IC< T /D3.3: _ 39 34. /10 n /4 /5 / iD6.s D44 'D° n 90 u v a, o I' 4 \ 3 ` ° 2 ° / 34 3 m ° 38 o ,•�L> � 43 37 0 �5�/ I Q. - qL p ' \ D L 4 SD o e t 36 7/.z. �— 99.3/ 4/ 4 Lot 50 \ C // TR./g032-3 /o 7Fn f- c` [` 3R9— OATE OLO NO.I NEMNO. E- poi 6 0.84Ac.N/. /7 a/ 5Lo>5/ '„ LoTE I9/8910 ro301D91160�5.TB3 34, 1.23 Ac u'' OJ7A VERDE WAY i M.B. /20/70-73 TFOcf No. /4032-3 M.B /43/69- 73 14032 ASSESSORS MAP BK. 624 PG. 26 \ y• RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIF A*W \ AUG. /98/ _ J 621-09 620- /8 T. C. A. 7527 THIS MAP /S FOR 1814 5 2 SEC. 5 , T. 55., R. V C E. ASSESSMENT PURPOSES ONLY 08 09. /7 <`5aa ,.Sx aS 5&5-AC /= 400' I - I For LOT C \ 24 32 Tr 4/62 n I � N , 3 � Q 8083 AC.f �; o O 2 W h W O ' Tr 4//5 _ 2 3/ V be Q 25 ze E46 I T O Pa LdA 4/8/Tr c . . . C7T /2 26.44A,.� I \ II 1 5.25rAC LOT N-N •12031 2LT1 a i 4t'o W y ^ 30 Q W v \ • y 38.56 AC.f 39.54 i % '$ w GATE OLD M. NEW Na. 2- 3 4 !,ST J = J 5-80 /3 /4 5-86 /1 S S/ 2/B7 /3 16.i7 10 j1 �J no.a z';8e ec .J6 iOae.OG = 6 l cor E - - - os c - - - 4 1324.56 273864/ �i, _ COB —{ — COUNTRY CLUB- PAL G� —Z/ ' OR. �7 ^ ' 7 8 8 9 f622 MB 69110-29 TRACT4115 03 MB 6711-8 TRACT 4181 MB 67/13-37 TRACT 4182 OA rA . RS 54/38 A•SSESSOR'S MAP BK. 620 PG. 18 MAR. 1971 RIVERS/DE COUNTY, CALIF 8N 620- G O T. C. A. 0/8-074 0/8-082 S 2 SEC, 4 T 5S. R. 6E. THIS MAP /S FOR ASSESSMENT PURPOSES OA@Y i /9 I 626 02 n n /O.00Ac. / 400' / A /c 425Ac3 5.00Ac S.00Ac. SOOAc. 5.0OAc. S.00Ac. 1.00Ac. 5.00Ac c: L1 II 4.59 Acd R .51 4.59Ae� • � 0 0 I � 20.00Ac. I , 4.25 Q 25�Ac. S.QOAc S.00Am 5,00 Ac 3.00Ac S.00Ac ,S,OOAa S.00 A a9 626c. I /9,62 Acf /7 / b 3Jo N89°4333'E I' m ^ II E3/8 OLD N0.1 NEW NO. � O BO/-BOa 3B-4/ I Q - 57 42,s 7 Q Q 5 u 7 43 57 /jam Q N 44,- �� C/ 5.36 Ac O 10 44, ST. I 4.25Ar 3.00 Ac. 5.00 Ac. S.00Ac S.00Ac. 3.OOAc. 500Ac. S.00Ac, 606 -B6 4/36 10,Sr - c�41 b4. ,k 33.73 Ac. Y. tk 42 2/87 22 3/,ST ii 3.7/ q� I � 9/ea 32 52,53 tqS 3699&*Q625Ae..t 233Ac. 233Aa. 4.67Ac. 4.67Ac. 4.67 Ac. 4.59-tAC. 4.674c 4.67Ac /8— _ �HB COUNTRY CLUB DR. 624� 62 DATA GAO PLAT R/S 34138 R,S 72182 PMw 85-9 ASSESSORS MAP 8K. 620 PG.20 RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIF. SEPT, 1967 Tl 620—/8 620 27 T R.Q. 7527 FOR. k SE//4 SEC. 5, THIS MAP /S FQ4 TS., R6E. ASSESSMENT PURPOSES oWLY OPu 4A ku 0,25 AC - �,..., t0If �i 9i' I a 0 • / 0 ,> m rzs• 5/.4i 077Ac r•�e "� J a / A ww a^ ry + /0 �w-o_2 .P. O O ~` Z° - /73Ac 11 > 44 //4 1 32 43 A ° y 22 3 ; A PM 61/49 OflB° I 4 r./272/ 4,y.�z• — --- - 'p '' P 42 ,o'• Sh'• �s° //5 I 0 e>, h\ ^° � i° 035 i Q In o116 43 0 0 ° 6/ i y 30 , /�� ;/y �O 1.64 Aea O 7 4/ e 36 Oy hO P //7 �Q y a ae»e' \IdAci- 29s�' i j° .je• ?O4O °a 37 O//B2.3 Om24 51 ro '^ 3 < °�> 71a f5/•. o. � i6lCirr Ace �I 25 - 26 27 2B y 8j ' ' '-� '• 6 7 .5 139 °v Azy.>" Q/I Ace / 1.0 DESSTF . • ° s ° La CA rE KD Na EW NFi aor" 'J'O zs>4 �c>U DE 4-a-72 012 80/ l Q $ 27 26 /6 a° a°- I ti /7 /6 /5 /4 /3 /2 // /0 O r/2nl le Baca' sc.ze' w rd vz.oa' ee>e' Br �' ` — _ 60/ 7T1-46 h 425/ ° LOT a19.4e' \\ •/• �v �,r' rr.425/ rr. 4/15 47 3/B2 272-32 50,5/ Il2JJ152.33 S//4 COc SEC. 5 c 212-34 1 54,55 T _ r"/1//A O _ _ _ G�m 8 - - �rnry ZE - 2,2J5156,57 _ Ti'II] .. 4/BZ 12-"'31 SB Y <' 2-JJ 59 12- 60 NOrE aJ M.B. 68/89- 96 Tioct No. 425/ 622 A 1,aggA899 iNrREST /N [Or -E,OF rM OF RAcrNo NO VGL B ///B99 A.E,H. /-NOF rMACr N04/Br M.B. /05/64-66 Trcct No. /272/ O2 c///699 .• A- VV NO 4,82 O SEE MAPS6A-rl,/B FOR LOrAr/ON JF MECMEAPON LOrS ASSESSORS MAP 620 PG. 27 PM 67/48- 49 Porce/ Mop No. //908 RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CAL IF AUGUST /97/ aB 620-/B 620-28 T.R.A. 7527 POR. SE 114 SEC. 5, T. 5S., R. 6E. I i I O I gB.27. 43.49' ia' _ - O ch 59'ral' m b b a l 5p'Sp 0 S b -O T S 44' 4A' 2 9 SS LO z' T ss' s2.p4• q as' sV c I mm � m 35�G / 33'r� 33' R• a s o O F 1� m V1 9z y ti . Sr G Lor m h 31 _ F_30 0 4� n �l © !0' s5p N a O e Op q co ~O w y kq 'i .afro O o /Vt���f.���'4 N "n N ® ©F 6 TS,eZ' BB.44 31. 59 33' ®. a m ((��• Tz B5' 95\ 52..4' 55' \ 51' 11. 4'�9 6 8y { m Q j3,dig 83.4 1' LOT 'T I n - h 52 \ N o M N b 7L.73 n , ©� s ix5 0° \04 TF MO Np. W Al2 m � �13 `W� g Q tVS air w n p 33' 3a• �� h 4 zo 19.72'1/.99 SS• 45' 561� .O Lor 'a' N � 1 � M I k c � in I T T 44' yyy, N � N M. B. 69//0-29 Trcct No. 4//5 Nor' A.1//899 /NrpEsr /N LOT N.N OF rRACr NO 4//5 B///B99 A.E,H,/-M OF TRACT NO 41di / \ C///899 A-VV OF l ACr NO 4/82 / 5 O SEE N405 620-/7,/B FOR LOCAF/ON OF RECREAr/ON COT ASSESSORS MAP BK 620 PG 28 t� °Q AUGUST 1971 R:'VPRS/DE COUNTY, CALIF S'' / � ✓e 620-18 620 -29 rR.A. 7527 POR SE114 SEC. 5, T55? R. 6E II 3GLF 71' Is so' 564 �030'5 75' 75 7s. k n 565 290 92 75' 293 2 ,i250Oh Lor 'j' tq �fW 21-2- 4, 251 �5)234 t567 94 N o /11Z /001 @302 774., 252 296 295 '�271 4 4568 aq 7S' 270 253 60 5 32 0. 569 170 269 170 296 299 267 268 1 0300 0 254 54' 54' 3z ?01 t. (�6 570 ti 3 0� 7 50 291 �993 Wi' j . ' 2 S'Z I I 571 55 • 55 43� 5144 1 / v. / e3 a B. 1." 257 229 9 T 266* 0265 264. 263262. 261 260 259 258 o Q /0 227 573 o.j" (O 226 Oil) 217 218 219 --229 223 224 4) 0 1&,7Z' 579 Lor "X OE5E-R F ?EEA'S __9p. N' Pm575 55 5.1, 0 560 581 577 3 576 DArF kXD NaWEW�l 594' in 592 591 ffx 589 588 587 L4 L � ;S'L�85 584 58 so i rl, 4115 Lor r I F__ GL U8 4 DRI�E 15 606W FRY 819 NOrE M. S. 69110-29 Trod No. 4115 4 111899 INrRfsr IN 4or N of rRAcr N0411.5 9 111,999 A-E,M, I-M OF rRA c r NO. 418, 622 C'//899 A-V V OF rRAc r 4182 0 SEE MAPS 620-17,18 FOR LOCArION OF RECREArIoN Lors ASSESSOR'S MAP SK 620 PG 29 R1 VERSIDE COUNTY, CALIF AUCUST 1971 11B 0/8- 076 62/-/9 I84/ 622 - 02 POR. N//2 SEC. 8 T. 5 S. R. 6 E. T. R.A. 1854 POR. CITY PALM DESERT 62 22O Y I re20q. N89 C/'z 9'6 S3Oo ol _�. -- ... CITY :zfB.73 L4d.73 BP747 '1 �"OFz2 es '"PALM —DE SfAT� 1 624 7'EX � 03 0 0.73 Ac' L 14) P.I.Q. f Y � gyp q J w • •I.Q.' � I T � nl M V T O O �N - 24.17+AC. b b I"�' 57 02 Ace 729.4 c 725Ac 'I o f�' /9.0/ Ac M V e 624 o y 04 N, 26 v, b I 0 v 827. 77 _ GG2./ _ 33/.3G 33/.35 33/.35 � 02 40 V w J W b w w: v 4.75Ac 4 75Ac 4.75Ac 4 75Ac v o 475Ac -4 75Ac 1 � I p L - ,W IOATE INEw No ocaW a/ 33/ 38 33/ 3P 15187 8 -// 1 29 n WE Q L 3>544Z_ 33i 39 33/ 35 .. - 35, 59 33, 55 QO i 1 4.75Ac v I, v J.96.4c 475 Ac 4.75 Ac 475 Ac 4.63 Ac 4.75Ac 4 4294c!- 4 .75 Ac l 4.75Ac 75Ac 4.75 Ac j EX U o O 46 Ac h —~ 23, 33/.43 33143 33/ 48 9a 4837"'E 53 o3.3Z ' NB ROJ NO NEMNO fj S,,T5/ 26 38 DATA, RS37184 39,40 M8//2/4/ O6 O7 3s 4/M8104120 zeo-/�4RS34/38 .s-3E 4z,5T.93 S ASSESSORS MAP BK622 PG 02 0!4 9! Sr S' RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIF 4/86 s ,$ R G ✓ULY'80 d6193-9! IB 62/- 96, 97 FOR. SI/2 NE114 SEC. 8 7 T. 5 S. R. 6 E. r. R. a.o/e-Oss 622 — 05 SHEET l OF 2 FOR. CITY OF PALM DESERT 02 1 /✓B9^a5 p/"E /9B8 09 Tr/40.x9 T,14079 3 3 3c �1 3c 3G 3C �9h Pp�ico, L43444520 330 34 zR yx 'tio a v 32 ec xaG6 r m ° I(7 ms aye G, 2/ 3a340 % . / /00' v o /7 bhv ��� 22 3/ F:a5� '� 36 L p/ F 23/6'Jig a \ 1 n37u Bs y 24 J B'29 v IT n Ppr 401 K LAI 5, _ v 26 / v - 27 E rec.as BfS66°6— r��L01 8 t c, 3�0:� ® ® h //74) //8 //5% //6 0 1,6 /61 7 /34 , / I Jz Jz � 'V /O I W n 9 9 N I ' T \ ci97 Lpf C 0 91 Lot £ /2/ 6 .xO5 a ,U. s O Ip /v I �6 /3/ 3G jc G '� S B v `A 3qG/ 3G 3 30 6 7 ' sx.aB Jl.2G 4 �v m 3G �c /22 � /28 /29 77 g�5g o 6 5 O� I I 130 /29 J m /26h /25 /29 /23 9v c F© O 1Je � 7� �� Tr/1079 Lp � , :�.�019 O r� 'c h - - �YO'b'GC=�Y NB 9 o s(6 a(9••Lr - -�Al�'� Od TE OG D NOS NE M Np. n O2 M. B. //2140- 45 Troc1 Alo. /4,079 ASSESSORS MAP BK 622 PG. 05 RIVERS/DE COUNTY, CALIF. RG JUL Y 80 621- 97 T. R. A .O/8- 033 622 - 05 POR S112NE//4, SEC. 81 T 5 S. , R. 6E SHEET 2 OF2 02 50 Tr/1079 Tr N079 /L 3c do 3C 50 3c For Lot L h O� '3c .. O 0 i 46� 47 m 48 O w 57 58 �4 i° 9.05Ac w�) 7/ 1: 49 h 3c 'c 3, �50 ''c v a56 ' 30! .,< u 59 i• ,w a.70 Jr 3c 3C 738> - /"- /00, •ic O j 55 �_4'� 60 69 1., 74 n 4 / Lot H Lot .I dl a<52 7 50 �Vr 6/ ` ,�l _ 6B gs J tl/ /l s: l6 n V©BS �/\ C 76 e Q� \ /7 n mm Por Lot K \\ / I/ n 63 /B M65 7 B 5��\ \ 1�6 ,sn64 �/9 W �40�.(�s'� 1 16 I m 7B m W m BK RRI3A ♦'LOI B _ m 79 O OUIE CV /©309�9 a®/33/O TIIII s3Je2 �41vn.!!.u7 Vc s BL�6♦�_4� B•pO //2j38c v P6/6 /06 / � 09 92/ v Lot G ' LAJ W � 7=INE 93 �4 e s N B6 3. 3- 94 61'5 lL 7 31L 84 „ � ¢ =V ®®s' pv V ti 2 so \ 1 � 3L iL I 7r/1075 Lot Tr i1079 196-9. 33 — L: N rE <G'49"E r, OArE OLONO. NEM NO. h �1 112 140 -45Troc/ No. 14079 I ASSESSORS MAP BK622 PG 05 RIVERS/DE COUNTY, CALIF ✓ULY '80 - T.R.A. 1832, POR. N W I/4 , SEC. 9 : T. 5 S. R 6�E.'. 08K SHEET / oF.2POR.' CITY 'OF PALM DESERT. • 5 4 ✓ene eras e 7 —8 C/TY ... RY ass 3 v PALM —g OES£RT LIMITS 3s' rif10Jl-I' .Lot 42 fn - AIIOJ?-r •� Common Lot 5/ jJ79? .oc. sg o Caninon Lat57 /'\ or H. 62 cr Common Lot 55 7q ' V•/) - s s�J�p� S6. 1 S6 P a T'" - . \./ �i2.vsys 3/AG Nt a c�' f9l Vs"s'=>•'-_> _ �- 1 - . 9' ry'° ao. .,ss. -e Lot F - � � i5 s c.us3 � -� ,(133 AcN/a V ;z'. + 1� b O\ u � .� C ao ^ao u 'n o ^ae ata ,so :• ancs �-• roc VJ J 1j6^tVV�L fro v . v v a 0 0 '.i r 3.06Ac b t G /` �' 4oPs r' .: � /00' •/ Oo ; : ib � ; ` ae f•ov c\ o /'' .6 J �J `�J � .rJ� �6 6 8 v_\.9 - B 2 / y{-6 I of r. 5 6 yG v. o o z \ c �28 27 2G 25 24 23 2?. 2/ 20 -a1F \ot y - I !m5 ! i y v ° a " c o s e 9 1'� cal C Como, n Lot 53 022% PLAZA DEL SOL '._, -JJ.a7 Common Lot n I b 28 Ac Aft % a /.y $ \ $. r 1.42 Ac.N• /2 to8K d 2 3 .\� e/8 i. 6 ~' \ n a ' be " \ -\ \ i' v: o /3 ��3 V .,, •�j.m x b O �j / v+ l• a O o \ \ ;Jii• c /7 a ,.'!t o \,\ `\\ •r7 J.•o ti' V 0 32 Q C l7 `f �r c \ \ \ L4 16 ^ p 33 .c O - \ \ �v 4 ry. .. 0 bl cis sa. \ \ o 0 -P4Y�•8s^ foe R. V \\ \. o w�. q�SOh sp e� ER/N95fLL/4 '=s.or= l� O s " I I •, tr Go ♦o.or ---GGG»��- a n h ^ h to Iaei y '� dr r J 7 C43 u ;42 c 41 o'40 o e 38 o 37 0 .I - S __ yo5 sL /4 o Comm Lot 54 "r ,\� 1S 8 e rl (C `J 4/ ®` ® © 6 '6 aso5 /O // 2 `v o//3 b /4 ®AcNl 5 'o 16Iis v v no '✓` DO r, ?.. , 5e j7'07'•e 78n 132 b Comma Lof 52 $ 4 i Q .4� M16 nwo+7-? so, daJs �5 di / GAc o,oa e; 'p JAr! OLO NO NEMMO. 45ee ® y SEE SHEET 2 OF 2 M.B.110198 - /0/ Troct Nu. 14,032-1 8. 120162-65 " 14, 032-2 o � NOTE: Lois / lbra SG have on 1150 /nreresl ASSESSORS MAP 8K.624 PG.02 /n Common Lola 3'- fnrc 57 RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIF . RG -. AUG ' BO - 62/-9/ POR. NW I/4, SEC. 9 T. 5 S. R 6 E T. R.A. 1832 6 2 4 - 02 POR. CITY OF PALM DESERT. SHEET 2 of 2 uSRMOS L—���/LLO — LM tc 00.°9 C N�I A p 4C 22 � T v /9 2/ 23 $ 20 ee 24 uA SEE SHEET / OF 2 -� 24 P ?gC b7 - Nfc._� C�"� O Common Lot 59 Common Lot 52 25 Z5 o pl n a m of o 136 36 `� v yl 59 acl q Mi N a rA031-r °p �J i°cp _ 13J5 34 © a /./5AC.NL a/.c7 26 �6 F In V v v / 20 Ac o,0 ^ T,rao32-2 e Common Lot 60 s6° �J /eo v ! cb is I Jr 09 l37 3i a 34 cia ° /c I/G n / _ /00 145 (60 Q `-� v6 35 a� 27 (2p. 8 I 45� ^ 2.B4 AC.N,^ ,dt 7 I LA o F�� 43 50 I p 46 ao.ov ao 9 u I, a � 3B /!6J I sa ae.e9 2B 2B 46 46 ,ec _ `2 c+ p. r. 32 50 39 39 49 O22 33 \3/ 6/ r°wcas 29 9-1— 4 32 7 3t4B 4G90.09 e (40 3001 hti O/ o 48/ r COO.1MBI .YM D r5.' c A 74/ 4 \ ^i6.4_ L0t ' 6O22 tl. _ / �J] � 6 s \ I ; ; /7 `r 49 3. 6Ac 41 /3 /4 /5 /6 .v.i.T' n I - m \J`� ! cq �43 �0 Fo J t u Oo.O o /B OO.a9AC Q V 5/ 0.094C O.IOC' a09K' a094" l43 44 53 (52 ��� cy �� ' QO. moo. �. /9 OO./O A^ 0 o �' Sa 144) m h O r c o v u /� ac a: -• 4 ao °Oa, COMMON Common Lot 56 r, 56 55 '•53) r AREA a a � l54 57g. = E a ' COMMON AREA a 2008 209Ac o. F�rLot/07 1'a ':J l55` a� �9.434. - 25 L r90 °oag_? I Lot /OB ,ocs l a ® - - 3 - T,° �4 OC 7 z ^r c /q0` Tp/a03� 1 O 'i: O D�✓ IQ 27' OQOC' a S 'M I N 2.B6AC ti �41 bcs9� =5' C . a 26 a M1�/0 (Do.094C VI JIU ti 6O 40- 23 `// io4c rIJ b PA re IOLOM7 UEw • `�' y 19/B4 (136m91073-/1 I° 30 1299 . 28 27 2624�°c.�o 50 v Q C O 4 O , 002 OAC �68/ 8/ h O.OBAC O./OAC O.IOAC ao9C' aaws Z LY 0 25 /3 09 0 v V 'Oa 4L 5 Ic 3T� MB 110198-101 Troct No. 14032-1 — #A - t is osz i b 3as� srir'E zoo a/ MB 120162-65 14032-2 cot l J o m NB9"S�'ee-E 330.44' MB 143169-73 14032 03 26 ;. IIII I NOTE: Lots /tnru 50 hove on /150 interest Jib l�lb ASSESSORS MAP BK.624 PG.02 /n Common Lots 5/ thru 57 TR./4032-/B-2 RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIF. RG AUG HBO ___ 6 1 % F , I r SCALECITY OF PALM DESERT CAm 11110-1 i-Am t • � BEING A PROPOSE SUBDIVISION OFTHE N- I/% OFT14E N.E.1/4 m OF' SECT101�1 S , T.SS• , R•GE., S.B.B•M•; EXCEPT N• 44' AND E • 50; 1 0 l0 2o304Q 0 60 '14 �0901 f= 7600 F doc;c F �aoo AND PORTI0�1 TO CITY rD. pER DOEDS 3.5-g�! NtT. S1051 9-24- 646 f UAST. 234154,o.R • F y CG _ F 960G E 10000 f ----- — ;.., / % i_. :'Y .?►`..... 1!1 rw ' �)I I \ Q V I \ — i y l r - -- - --- - _ ---------- ---------------- —t=.-.-..-- - - ---- - -- ----------- •.mac � -__---- �- � Q I — i.�� * -- - — — — — — — — — — — --- s` ©e O / - D � o H 6 COUNTRY ' t -- _ — — — ■ r z - --2390 ---2� _ ��s _ _ �° _ _ _ _ __�. - _ �I - z { to _ _ ..... Ln _— ----- - €�tt NARY — - - - - - - ---- ------ ---- ,. - - - -- _ I.. LOT-, _ - R/w I _ OT ar OT O� R/wR --- �..:, 1.5-► � F t — i X {r / - Z 2�0 f ,n �' � It. 2g•5 � � F � f I I I mill �c 7 � , I g I I ,� y \;\1 �S r , Oc - - 33. c ,,�j• t , 1I , `�. > , \ >5 \ 126 3 ./ mow' N 0 , �. .• N - - l - - , fm , . �It , / V \ \ 1 I 44 _„ avSE uM c PLAN PH. ! PH 2 E z _ 1 , 10 to _ 1 0 _ 3 14•9 sz ! / j _ ` "h © L� TOTAL ¢ 1 44 8 5 47 / � <, � 1�_ 2° 1` � '� t �. 1 I ► r _ 1- �� _ � ) �._^ \ ; � I C✓. � � � � f To to P/on 4 44 houses= 25�0 1 30 h ;. - r ' , g , � ► _M <- ..�' y ;. r + :_•, � '�' , € 1 J •,. ry M 'e _ .� 8 , - O'._ _" _ Li✓i Arep 2 00 S.F. 1 . R \`\ �r 's' , 1 I , 1 M / `.: ' `/ k'r'F," 9 �� _ yF- .., '•' -- 1- �0— - —_ 1 j I Gort?ge Areo ro Do 5.F. ao • 5 '•. — � - �, ' \ = � _ . � - u � 1 _I i I T"o o/.� ZaoO S.F. \\ 1 0 �c� 1� �� A. 1 '" 9' \ - y- i Min. Lo f Size ze - 8000 S.F. �\ \ a, ✓ ' IZ /Z r i M I - \ 1 o� O < D \ - \ « 1 I p o. ` \ { t /t � ` �• � � � T i , K .-.: ' 7 ka� � � 71-' � '•:;:. a >. 1 � �-- , •., >r V' - 6 _ i' ry � ,I j 0 � Iru • t S \9 - Q ,, ^ yl r \ ) •+>` S �'('. . � ...., /' - 1 ,•• N 4 , , R .. ,, BAR >>r� � 0 ., '", '..._. " - -.. ! v. � j \ h • -. ` 1 ,,,�-': y ,, ti ... isJ 12 ° ,j .,'Ia"� , F l ,...- � tr / ivin Area j SOO S.F. > C. ,� QJ Ovb r N _ ♦ 1 5 f r,, G`j _ * N J 0 ev C^ Goro Are - h I(o•o 7' _dSB, 224 D �r Y '� _ r F� ` I 9 ,yo fog ,N I �,5� N O ' 9e s 600 S. To to 3 T00 S.F , 3 / o F B ;tea•. - -----_-_— - - � Min. Lot S i z = 88 58 S•F, - o. . 1 92 tiI0 \ �\ ! . I a Scot - 20 e, .. I5. - � • '"• - - --- _ a .�. ti 0 � s i, � � N o 3 � � ,_�. it > , I � �i �.' I ,t 4. 6 Y' k _ I �, � I � 3 i� � 4 O V' � _ ___ _.,...-_. -_ .W � ,.� � ,,: N �.�, 16 � 0 •:r ,. � to \\ $ 4R � C� Q I w 5 •.\ rL � / Y \. t' '1 „ � ,\55 'l' tr � 98 d' � 2 Iv 33 F 9 � - , v /� oC y � C 7 'ry4 15 � 1� I -„ -�$161• Z. n, N m `\q . � �_'�$ N o' I I CS ,N _ �,XIS _ _ - - a 14 2R s 0 0 a At - 4 � V1 N. 171 �0 /5' 0 1 - - -- -- - - - - E t _ - I ,. o _ �_ _- L E _ a / C z°` a•o --i -�, . r _ o PLANS BA 36 ao \o _ -/ i 9 =•' r •r - a` g ac 214 ,+- REM6gA/�/ T "' l-O o gip- -� A1/ — y �. -� _ �V - _ •i W m (i viny Areo 2800 8F• ✓,R ' T C - 3, = W Goroge 600 5-F: ; ,, 74 170 R F; , 4 Z N 8Z 2i�83' "-\ ►,r I Sc�� 7 0� ► I 43 � , 55'D�' `3/� N N N N 80 1 •.N N ` t82•S' Q / Z 7otoi 5400571 _ 1 , 1 y 9 a ' I � __--_,_ , � '� --\ � v -�2 g• - r,� .� Miw. Lo f Size - 97/5 S.F, o IQ•o _ E ^ s , \ - r2a 1 •9 ►z.S •i oQ � I' 0 2,•S +n � �\ ) -- IL,a ID 0 ,5 - o 100 ( - - 7 `F 95 �f 92 �I - . B O 6,R 2, 2� Z - ZR - /R - Q ' ) - ��. 93 0 _ 2 r2 5' -N 1 _ � _. 2 /R R I F e-•- �� \\. -- H v� -• ----� 54 N 5 t o -- 8 , � � 1 \ � , � �"� 3F Y '� .. r �v r Y r 1► -r`/r . 4 ` 1 .4• y \.. - -- — , - � ' Y YYYV YY-Y YY �� Y•Y xY_]G1^f rO rY Yv � Y�Y Y.s^ _. � - � I VY - r. v'- YY.Y .. ,. - 1 � � .'.: . \ _ . Y A , � � � '1 73 ' Zo' � "'1^;� N o, m -to 0 E ;�•>� EX1S' 4 1TY 1?.fl. RAL�G SEMI ISO 8 I21 o � �- Oo1 -- - — - - � _ Qa-o7 y LPG A Al 4 O �� ) J I L_. �� I ! % ;%, I \\I I�OU� ' \ I / ' / �\ \\ I I �1 2 S TOR Y HO USE) FCivin9 Ar 4o 000 ti L/'vin Area n Floor 2200 S.F.. II or e Area : '!o .F. G a e� oa s h a 9 —.—% - — — _ --- - - --- _ _ T R• I kC013) r _._ ------ ' ------ _ ---- . _ _._..... �. :.f- _ --_ To to l 2800 s.F. E 7600 ,I coot EiGGG 7' J F 84(,(, F 88CC F 9�( (, F 9E0� E 10000 Min. Lot Size 8000 S.F. too 3 d1� Io` •zo' � � 20' - to' vu�; °' v''�u.E. / �I PNfi►SES Sl•IOWN THUS EXISTING LAND USE : VACANT ;a - u ocW 3 w �I to ; I :� > ■ tltltlt .1s .�.ls.rtr�l o • PROPOSED L.AKD usE : RESIDENTIAL CSEE LC'FT) TYP/CAC. HOUSE � 20 N7CATelt _�� � .. � EXtSTtNGZONt1.iG - PR• 5 D� `AIA'1 1 1 s 4r RES• LOTS t t W€ZZ �tTE LOT C�OT40� • t�td Cf�ANGE PROOPOSE O yy 'y � R F[.Oo�e PGaN2 44 RES. LOTS ( LOTS 133 THIZU 140 MOOLL SITE) ,;LOT I (o' Ce' 2' 1 LA►IDSCAPE A.C./A•B.PAV1N6 4'SIDEW.ILK /A•S.PAVI1,4 o MC gAlt- COMPANY 3 = A. RES. LOTS t 3200 DANV IL�.E BLVD., SVITE 200 1 1 OKLY tuR6#OUTTER 54GUTTEM1 A, =45 RES• LOTS 3 SITE P.O. 60X IOS<D ALAMO CA. 94507- 1914 I SECTION C•LOT 3 LOTS A , 13, C, D, E,F', G,N,Y TOT.= 1,Co RES. LOTS + I WELL SITE LOT I- 0 (415) 636- 14-G0 . o' EXtST PAVING -- i> COUNTRY CLUE OR TABU CATION 5 s 2 MULTI FAMILY APARTMENT LOTS (TOTS 1l8r►s) __ 7 err- �' _ s Ui`11T5:-ACREAGE P NAPPLICANT �s TOTAL 213 UNIT - f ' J 33' d TOTAL RESIDEAlT1AL UK lT3 -389 17G SIKGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 45.0 DEVELOPER D f L-' s 7.S' 37. d e_ ' g'MEANDERING CA•C./A•8• �MEDIAN� �I Il.s' 20' rot 6' Zo' Ls' 3 9•s ' o Is.s' S' te.5' s I �•s' WATT INDUSTRIES PALM SPR1PlGS , IhIC• 511MVVALK PAVING cuae3 G NOv >E 213 MULTI FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 2'1.9 P�� - T 0� ,� LA1dDitA e v t'�AKo�cAPe C,�D, E , F, G, H , I , J = PRIVATE STREETS LN ' CURB4GUT Eti , Lei ,� Loz • LOTS A, Ia, c.vw•o. WELL S ITE o.5 PALM SPRINGS . CA• 9 22Co3 PORTO<_A AVENUE _ couNTRY c1_us oR. LOTS K , L, M , N , O) P 1-kW ESCAPE LOTS lu C lldCl•LDSCP. STRIP (•� (G19) 325 - 117-0 a POR�OLA XVE• CINCL•LOSC-P.STILM) 1.1 EASEMENTS O E E Atil WATER. F ctL.tT1E5 1N ° L.UNDIN DEVELOPMENT COMPA1dY � " Culls rinTTtR �MEDtAtJ C00.S5 tugs#GV-rTER NTS FOR 5 W R D R A s 389 TOTAL 7.6.6 *� h, a stoew,nt.K MED►AN coass G steEwA1.1C 23 SO I PARK SO R RENTO, SV I TE 207 A.C./A•6.vAvING PRIVATE STF,EETS ANO P.V.E. TO SE GRANTED To C.V.W. D. O GtJRB>y GUTTER A-C./A.S•oAVtNG VRB�GO rTER • �' CALA B AS AS C A • 9 I3O2 • 3 UNIT COUNT 6ASE0 ON INCLUD111G-FIRE STA•SITE: %-O AC.) (818) 346 SECTION "8 LOT J LOT A ENTRY EASEMENTS FOR DRAINAGE FACILITIES IN PRIVATE S'fREET3 f o o. - wNtr • vl� Ito' -AND P•V.E• TO BE GRANTED TO GtTY PI.t_M DESERT. t4 � ��- I j o O 43' 3' I l' NOTE, r: _ ,. LOT i 3� o0 3 A.C./A•8 PAVING ,. > w 6 va MAP PRERARED BY t 3a' 9' 4' t K 50' So' ; CURBS 4 G U TT E RS TO CITY • UTILITY AGENCIES ' 1 WATER : COAC1.IEL_LA VALLEY WATER V(STR1C•T R . ., �s' i•5' i ' MEDIAN CURBS PALM DESERT SEWER AtVO yk' , t►i.: w._ h 16.5' 24 18.5' y ` D 5 ELECTRIC • 'S0. CALIF. EDISON CO . I , S 1 DEWALKS 5 TAN ARD .� � 'CIAT y , �: ,. • � � ExIST• rAVI'Kv TELEPHON� � GENERAL-TELE co -�`"--- � O a DRAINAGE FACILITIES ,.r--— .. • S O. C At.l F GAS, CO put- GAS .. c a �__ _ _ --- --- - - -- -- -•-f . - TELEVISION PA ER Eu1 VICINITY A� .m$- tom = t3-x` LM � cA�L s1oN � CINITY M � �, � � - _: ► \ '�aEAKCERI�� SEWER AND WATER FACT CITIES (INTERIOR VTI LITIESTO BE PLACED UNDERGROUND) CNo SCALE 1 nD.■.ra ► t w*AEAWOERING .c-/A•5-PAVING M[OtAN C\fRQ$ G MIEAtd(?E0.lNifs \ MEDl4t`l CVRe$ 1 of Le vr f108WAL1� CURf3{6t1TTER SIOCMfALK It. 44 I�.C•/A•6• PAYING CORE}4OTtC0. SIDBWAt-K �'O C•V.W• D. .ISTAI�DQ►RDS EWCRTo CIAISTt"G NIA N 1, BORToL-A AVE. Z o „ COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE SECTION "A'- EWRE DR . WATILATIETO9JEASTING MwIKt 1�. COVKTAY et� 9*. IMRTOLA AV. • PARK' PVBL.IG_PAR4� AREA REQt3lREMENTS TO P�EMET 6Y FEE PAYMENT. • P I C A 1... S T R E E T S E C T - 1 O N S MAP PREPARATION DATE= 5 DEC.OEC1989 Pc.oT P(.,4N Fall P�4$Es r 2 T Y • ..R•...-""' c... ..�_. , .t .. t,w rl I , ,s j Y F� r 17 kA }w pal, 1 s � "a ' � 1 - 2t it. i 'Ar +'.t:: a,,,,,: ra: :`: ram.•. i � _ 1 x 1 rt , w e A: c. ...__ _ � I ,. �c sa"x "� �=fir sp• ..�.� .._ „ ..► ,x�,. ,.., .,.t*, .%.e� a , � � ,p a ij. . .� __ ate►; MIT- 66 . ,_, ;..,. ..:..' .,.: .g � a+ :* -,.vvy :.,.. "vr,ry ,,.. i+, .,...,. ,9• ':, w-.G,_:.. ':: .ky.. 3SY�— b � .�. ,�° � .. �':: .. T i r t , mow , 1 riv Q .fin ,...�.. .. .. :,..e .' .. a _..v- _,.v _.. ,.. .. ,_ ...,MY n'�^`9:... '^`f"S 9.haWa�J.•.W"*t:.&:..,, .. ..?55,,w''.xyrvY...4uDM,x+'... sluvntuKa.'aAA':,.i;-e_, � '.x'64tiv.,_:�",::"�,,"'.:. ..,�.3?T'x�^bk............. .....i�v�w��� _..�..:,. ._. .. .. � h. .w^yW.w=r.anr-ess.W+,.,.=nw-.,. a+um-.+r...e,w.uw„h:+vea.,+..«.±.M L«+aww+w+.�>wt[rt->....,s+ ,wc.+.r- --r...�.✓a ..- _+,u>�.:vt. e'�1+ -, '�"�,.Fx a.: 9K., $ :_ '.494.-:d.'.. �......�....- .v�. __ _.. " .. .. ,,. ••,^r�'A+m1.Rf^�_w[."^,'-,"�'^�."S^�C>+„*'H+,^m3' +.t.•„x,esK.., ,:_.prn,:... ..ari v:-•�':'y z�. ry,�, � ' , 3 { I! l 111 I _ � - :�.«�«:o>w.,�.,w.�:.,..�.c-a>n„-wu-:...amsw.nwen;s»�:ewwa:.rpia+'�',c..rrw.�.a�sss�,-:+".:-2�,..:.b'�'.r.c ✓;, ,... , I t I , EN AT , " IVE T R A C--,*CITY OF PALM BEING A PROPOSED SUBDIVISION OF THE N.' 1/2 OF THE N.E. 1/4 OF SECT10N 8, T.5S., R.6E., S.B.B.M., EXCEPT N. 44 AND E. 50 , AND PORTION TO CITY P.D. PER DEEDS 3-5-86 / INST. 51051 & 9-24-86 / INST 234154, O.R. 9g A1 _0 N. 8s'4121" E. COUNTRY CLUB DRlI/E �,C/L 2s5o.oT�� a ti9'c i n^ c, �% $`°L ,,/4• n?�` n c ? \ "' �` EXISTIN �'1'ROPERTY BOUNDRY •c' R W ` LO C to .�• �. RAW �� ^ ti/� ti ti 2390 fix. C u rb- LEGEND - __ - -R 'W _ - - ----- -- N1 TER NE (C/L)-PCTENT1ar{ ` -- --� ,- o LANDSCAPE LOT C" O / STREET CEN LZ LANDSCAPE LO "D" - - =' - :1 ,, - I� I 890 s �, -83' r- 93' q:42 70' 70' 70' 70' 70' 70' 70' 70' 70' 97' 111 15 21 118 1 1' 15' PROPERTY LINE (P/L)_ -- -- -- p I I 1 EXISTING CONTOUR= 40' 40' > N XISTING la FINISH CONTOUR= -100-- 38 37 36 35 34 33 �_ 32 31 o, 8°, 17 146 ^ ��, iK I DAYLIGHT LINE= --o-o-e-o- I 441 40 39 31 �/ `.�� q l.s x 32.43Z. 32•I 73 3s,1 3�,-I 38,4 3s.� al.� FIRE TATION '4 3l•8 .S �36 ' 1$ �� I I I DRAINAGE DIRECTIONS - - -� -� o t 2 \� 55' I 15 } 4 I� DRAINAGE SWALE OR 60' 70' 70' 70 70 70' 70' 70' 70 70' 70' 3 30 I 4 41•(oi 33' 40.'1 �Nq gyp, �. Tor H �� 11 32.3 �j� a io 29So o " " 74 X' 37. �� ( 2' 0 `S,. ,�,� I SCOPE FACER Y 0 �� a J I , �l�r ou 0.4/0_ N 9�. �'� 2.32 r; +� - .sj �` ! c y� T TOP CURB I -� �I - �lrl- yy �. �. / �y9 14 I FL= FLOW LINE Q I 2►. j 45 'v I 41$ o a9 / 1 FG= FINISH GRADE v �\J M N (P ASE 4 ��sJ 29 19 0 40.0 �`)' �/ I`� L, I FS= FINISH SURFACE I I I 117' \`L 70' 85' 0 pG �0, ?mac 40' ( I I HP= HIGH POINT I LOT 242 u' / 1y I 55 70' 70' 0' 80' 61 O, ,\0 11g �j o h 13 J , I GB= GRADE BREAK r, vJ P. 6'. \� O 0 11 , ��S S SY� �, 0 �q�,5. 20 20 50 50' I BVC= BEGIN VERTICAL CURVE 3 I I MULTI-FAMIL RESIDENTIAL, SITE vJ I I t}6 61, O 31 o ��Q J 6 31,1 6'�. "�' ? 81 ' Q\ 30 38.3 1k0 ( TGC TENDGVERTICAL CURVE Cam" 31 3 35.1 . u1 10 ACRES-162 UNITS - 49 2 20 9Q EP= EDGE PAVEMENT > I 1 ( ) - 40' 1 1 40' 3z•4 0 48 l05' ► 51 52 53 54 7 5 56 SP � �, �(I o, _ ti R/W= RIGHT OF WAY c4l �`�S` `" (PHASE 7) I �^ a 43z 3 ° 36.9 1� �: ,�10 \ ��' '� -�~1` yi ? .' 12 36.21 I �• I CB= CATCH BASIN \ I h 70' 0 0 I 70' 70' 70' 70' 71' 1 �. 41,p ,�� o. �� �. I FUTURE DEVEL PM N 128, 89 0' 3O' o• \ 2, o� 126, I I AV 20 'T0 cl.gv. >1/ ( O E T O III 87' - 80'_ _ 61 57 �240 27 4R, I 22 STREET E EY.LOT aND I Site plan 8 Architectural - I I ss' 105' >: \ t ���' ,� ems' 1Z1' 34.3,. o approval required �! N 31.2 _ \ �J � �. .�0 4 . ;0 2 � Q I tp p, � 33.C° 2 � 32 i0 11 0o a] tIL �^ REr t T wN / 95 - 31.$ � 30.1 ; o 'r' 88 in 87 86 Lo 85 0 84 � - � 33•G to - 91 N a, o. P• / F.G,Z4.0 Zl• 94 N o 92 o o �'� °j \,9 r 26 °° 115' C a o. 93 \ 00 90 cO 30.3 29 1 29.3 ,�. o. 58 �"' I } 23 w \ �J 34'9 n,`ti I 1 125' 32 5 I I �r 5g' 70' 85' 55 70' 70 >' 83 �. 1 - \ 9O, 25 - o ��o - - -- - \ �o� �� 4 0\�� 73' 75 70 G ?35 �' o s�`° � (7;5� NI � 10 ^ � \v ° d '� E �, >. a' 59 0 o 0 o 16/o _ - - - (2 - u: G \ 109, 24 3 25125' V -- - - - � Ooc ,.., .5 > °, ' N! I ?60 - - -Q - �: 30' 4�' `� d 70' 70' 70' 70' 82 �- 105' 0 9 0 �O f nl 142 12 84 0 70 130 �� ??�30' S8' 70 70' 73' 70 70' (�� 0 �, ,��� �6' 60 60, \ 0 r r ! n >r A I 138 60 30,E 3O°" 30•8 w I I,y SCALE. 1 100 20.0 200, _ 96 ;.� _ 30.9 % 101 102 103 104 05 06 107 81 s ° 61 M 152-to 1�_s 100 so' Z �. lu /0 177 176 �,, N N 149 ,�^� �� tO cn 99 29. 2s,6 z8•o �/ 3z.8 ` 95 0 0 --- 0 s- �o 153 15 150 t / 97 N 98 1 C� 15 >>, '• , 8 - 19,9 �tQ �- , P 'T 91• t _ '� R• > 62 h �1 29.2 19 9 22.1 1 9• Z 100' 50'25' 0' 100' 200' /s� 2a•4� 83 �tio 58 148 �p 1 67 70 70 70' 70' 0' 2o' 80 �62 °� 64 m c.� G 6 0, z3.� lss' ?s' 7s' 70 i . 19, 108 63 28 5 Q = �5 3S' 175 k 40 `S 76_ .2- -I-70' -1 70'-r- -70 -8 35 'Q, a <q 17 ,. 154 70 70 ?i 1_ 78 �" - 6'�, Sy B �j, \\ 80, 31.4 115' L,.Sl <z3S�� ~o olo q,l o• �6 // 147 . 82' ?ia 79 I 0 7 0 _ Q 96' o o 6 l0 , ov �I ST. N �j 22• i� ^o S �3.7� O`Z �. J 22.1 '`� 98. I r LEI --� N ,,D°\� ♦�/ s 131 130 w 128 127 126 - 125124 \ sS', �� 00 40 102 `� 1 6 0 is 132 �, 2i.5 23.0 01 z1.3 A' >>. 8 O 37' 65 (� 0 �I O I PHASING LIJ I 0 0 23,3 23.4> >. �. 25,E 77 o a- 179 �, ^� 174 0 155`60. it 19 I� 104' / a° �° �° ^� 133 24.9 �� �z a I•. �r JC 71 70' 70' 70 70 64, 39' Z2 2 \ 110 6 > . n �� �) 6 ~ - , : 21•0 2 ,2 �� 6 '" ° �c� 123 9 �� zs.l 25.8 ,� PHASE 1 25 LOTS 115 I8 2 115 115' - I ti 5 ° % S3 76 0 0 1 U (� 1 145 1 4/ F" S ,�� ss, \ 0 23.2 r 66 r o PHASE 2 29 LOTS lrU 18.$ 25�' C�<?zs� ►�.6, 25'125' 157 15s 1, 9 7s, o �? 34 h6 - NI- Nl- - 111 6¢' tiv�',' �. PHASE 3 37 LOTS <CI O O to to In ^ p �• ?� N N O O r 18o r In 173 r 156 to 0 ,.r - s r 5 r I PHASE 4 45 LOTS to I z�a� J �� 144 135 �o �� ��q 105' 116, 105' 30' e 122 �s 3 >S % �/� Q 11 112 � 75 67 0 24.0. PHASE 5 59 LOTS �}-I 95'- - 95'- 50 73 g 11�, 20.0, 21.2 214 23,3 s �• s, 20.2 o r I r C �� .� 6 �, �. l - PHASE 6 46 LOTS o T n 3 0 `." " e ° / �, ro Cj / 05 r ' / +t 218 121 8 z3,4 211. _Il 3 P ST. - � IG,2 �°� `'� 225 h o \ V, vi 22.2 , 7' 114' 3 p 181 - �- - "' m G. B 143 ti 23.4 121 _j% �� 22 9 219 21.3 113114 "?"s zzs 4 I ro f TOTAL S.F.D. 241 .LOTS P �SE 6 0 = N N 136 Q 213 ,� o �ti s- s , I i <2 I zz.l O PHASE 7 1&' UNITS D. 22 3 9 .� �• 20 , Z 55' 70' 70' 70 70 0 0 73 A? S(o .moo C� �,) to it 2G I to � 59 }14' � 12s' � 212 23.¢ � ', ° � w IG.9 �� 115 �z 0�74 � 68 � I I � TOTAL RES. 4 � 15.7 51' N !s , 0 41, 4' 44' 220 e�� �- • �2aS Ql r Z 0 0 2 Is.1 0� t I6, o\°/ ^oh e r 215 z3.> s , " '� 3 119 '� I �l r 182 r 1 20) \ - Co 160 °0 18 6 19.2 0 ,�0 9 0 0 0 3 0 'n 168`'' R9 170 171 172 142 137 "' 211 ' V .`�' 217 '9 > 20.2 ,�°�j r 114 r °N°f 5 ►g�,2 !9`� I �I j t. O 124' 115' 118' "� 30 2 8 o> A 221 6 C ��^ !I p 179 3 I 69 ,� VICINITY MAP N.T.S. I 14.2 �" I 13.5 Ig.l 18 4 113' S�- 2' S' 216 5 9 6 0 183 0 � 70 70' 70' 70' 70 0 14.4 \ I 59�4 zi.� �'1° / '.'` �•o l6.ra - ti Jf W = r r 161 v+ o O 0 138 ;� \��' �0 j �' %� 118 0 115 75 -�' 3_80`_ 75' r". 2 0 - -(?�J -I- - �i✓ NI r) 141 r� ao 210 0 16 /7,,. / 15,0 /07 222 1 r 115' %._ O I I �\COUNTRY CLUB DR. 0 1 115 115' N tk� N 225 - 1 ' J- M 16,9 13.5 13.0 I 115 z.lo _ 30' 130' 1n ;n 'tn 124' zo 116 M 208 tin 207 206 �3• 6�- 226 , -r," _ 14.I 14.2 i� 72 71 to 70 rn 115' I I O 15.g LO N 184 M 167 66 165 64 163 13.2 \ o� 13�• Is o 15.0 ,�'."� 16,9 i �,�. 14 1 I� ;� ;n i�, I 10;r� �,P i HOVLEY LN. r I, I 11 II•I 10.5 0 162��•a to 140 139 u� Ib,o ;n --. 224 U Lo ,' tO 117 0 116 to �-s 126 r J✓ I o - °o 30' 30 r 30 130 to 20 r 1 4 205 'n 227 wo S8' r 223 o SITE 106, 10 I 3.3 `"Y2Zp � .-4..4�, I5.5 3�, .z0' 30' 30 30' 30' i a ►-•L_ Q !;' G 55' 70' 70' 70' 70' - 104' 195' 95' . 95 95' I .2 55' 80' t 55' / 95. / ' 1 L� 1' 121' o °' 74' 95' , I o r Q " c8 9s 70' \V p, 1`Z e aj c6 c8 �- oe ) I _ ) Q O ^ ,� /7 4.4% l o S/. _ 1% t15 � I�j 1% 1 0 SEVI�Ri �SI�JENT 3'2 0.4`/6 _ Nc Q •G`/ ^ 12 2 IQ S�• _ - all ( ao 2/0/ I mj O 185 o I - - - - - d-�- - N � 0 2 `0 I - - N = I vTJ �1 � t 1 m '* , -- '" . I N I ON 'S7� 0 M A1�' 204 228 N �c6 ^ S.D• P c. 0. CB U S.D. - - O O o • M C.Q N 0, --- I O i a I 1�0 A� 50, 77 76' 76' 76' 76' 96' - 70' 70' / 70' 70' 70' 70' 70' 75 62, "�° 132 16'g IS' 1g2 71' 70' 70' 70' 70 70' 70' r 70' 70' 70' 70' ���g 202' Q n )S _ 1� 13,3 12.5 'r.� - WFiI WA Il,b 210 10•� 10.0 I I. 12,0 \J U 13.!° 13,0 12.1 _ n a O I �R0V�S _ _ i4s - to to LOT E ;�, I I y _ 186 �° 187 0 188 189 190 191 192 193 1194 195 196 197 198 199 200 � 201 °0 202 `'a�\203 229 ^fro 230 0 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 /4. FRED WARING DR. C.V.W.D. WELL SITE J ti� 14.0 14•'1 � 14.3 13l � � `� \• ' 1 '� r- 11.0 10.3 3•0 l3.5 15.3 Ib•0 0 16.5 15 2 13.5 Ii•3 13. �' 0 u•S U•4 o _:L (� �� 12 5 (�'- (� IG•'1 O 15•0 F -I -- -- - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - 1 --- , - 70 � 7 0'^- ^70' -�7 0' _ - � - 2 ' --� C')50'I r •. (?/5 - -- - - _ 0, 7 0' 70' - 79 70 70' 02 �---I - -80' - - - 110'- - - 72' -- 76' x76'-- - -76'-- - - 76 - - 96' -�y_1 70 70' 70' 70'' 70'^- 70'' 70' 71' 120 73' 73 109 77 ' - // Z 8 4 56 FF212.3 I F521o.0)i lJ 1_ '� A„T i A c`A I A v A,., �� F52o9.w•C (J I� (� f c I��rl ✓ . r - 2651.18 t. 10 20 EXIST. CITY IP.Q �RAI�IAGE EASEMENT I I �� ) ._' ((( I t(s•9), I , l � 11(rr� C (� r TO ANZA (5.8)i I .�'T Ai-� ,� x,)► '((,_;)� I ♦C�.�t I ,((0,9), / , ) �FF212.5) _ (FF211,f3) NSf ' IPOOL\ 1 v�� .. 1 I 11�nv I 1 tV/ v vn..nLiLnlVvn I - I 1- � } �� HSE \1 `vGI p Rnv.1 �`1�.1`t I j W ) 10 I_. \ NSE�\ 1 HSE (- p IIsE (r J x L _ v HSE - (FF114,2) i� � ) LA) . I I I (No MO. _ Ao2ACeN1� I I / / fISE FF209.2 FF209. '/ oL j FF ZIZ 9 3 60 FZILQ) ����-�1 ) W� (FF210.2) (fF2O9.9) I N5E ,� { }15f 1isE �` -? �i � #� SE, t fZo9.2 �, \ j K I „se 20 50 \� 50 tr ( ) i > S� `�F�21�.r�' �� +rs� \ , " �f,, 10 40 10 / FF212.o) I (F�iIz,o) \ (LL ND C �> FF113.6 �v /\ �'- HSE /f.F2►2.1) ' A S APE ( ) r F 212.I-) � , ; LOT 12splas 38 38 12 UTILITY AGENCIES TABULATION � ' DOWNER/DEVELOPER 6. 20 c� 20 6.5 8' MEANDERING 32' 6' 6' 32' SEWER AND WATER: COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT UNITS: `` ACREAGE: M C B A�'L 01VI PAN Y CURB & SIDEWALK SIDEWALK f cuR6 & EXIST'G. ELECTRIC: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. 241 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 63.5 32b0 DANVILLE B VD. SUITE 200 2% GUTTER 2%• 2%; 2% 1. 80 2/o-►� MIN. GUTTER PAVING _ _ TELEPHONE: GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. - .F-- 40' { \ 40' oc - -� 162 MULTI FAMILY RESIDENT iAL 10.0 P , LAMO, CALIFORNIA 94507-1941 • - z GAS: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO. A.C./A.B. PAVING BASE COURSE A.C./A.B. PAVING o 16' MEDIAN CURBS CABLE: COLONY CABLEVISION C.V.W.D. WELL SITE 0.5 (510) 838-146 15' 25' 1 25' 15' (INTERIOR UTILITIES TO BE PLACED UNDERGROUND) COUNTRY CLUB DR.', (INCL. LANDSCAPE LOTS), 4.1 60 WIDE STREET PORTOLA AVENUE SCHOOLS: DESERT SANDS UNIFIED SCHOOL DIST. PORTOLA AVE. (INCL. ANDSCAPE LOTS) 1.2 •\4 , 20 { 5 15 20 FIRE STATION 1.3 SIDEWALK 110' URB & A.C./A.B. N O'T'ES 403 TOTAL UNITS GROSS ACREAGE= 80.6 50' _ GUTTER 4% 2i PAVING r 3 t,1 3 t a_ 20 55 55 A.C. A.B. PAVING LAND USE. 7 36 7 BASE COURSE MEDIAN CURBS LANDOSCAPE 12' 43' 43' 12' CURBS & GUTTERS TO CITY OF , Y.; ` \ EXISTING LAND USE. VACANT 6.5 18 18 6. MEDIAN CURBS PALM DESERT . ;{ ��'"� L E STREET ENTRY s' MEANDERING 34' 9' 34' . CURB & SIDEWALK SIDEWALK 0. SIDEWALKS STANDARDS PROPOSED LAND USE: RESICENTIAL k `� V/S ASSOCIATES 2% GUTTER % 2%-+ I CURB & EXIST G. DRAINAGE FACILITIES EXISTING ZONING: PR (REMAINS) f t�'.a �¢ -PLANNING PLANNING •SURVEYING ---► MIN. GUTTER PAVING PREPARED UNDER SUPERVISION QF: ? Cook Street Business Park 2% 2% -- - - - - -- XPI`. 42-280 Beacon Hill, Suite D-3 z SEWER AND WATER FACILITIES TO C.V.W.D. STANDARDS . " ' "�,% o Palm Desert, CA 92211 N BASE COURSE A.C./A.B. PAVING O 36 MEDIAN CURBS SEWER TO EXISTING MAIN IN PORTOLA AVE. / �' K / (619) 341-1599 Fax (619) 341-1592 A.C./A.B. PAVING S COU � o ,�° N WATER TO EXISTING MAINS IN COUNTRY CLUB DR. & `, , ` o 50' WIDE STREET TYPICAL STREET SECTIONS COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE PORTOLA AVE. I DANIEL FERGUSON,R .E.25203 (E,KP 12 31 97) MAP PREPARATION DATE. MARCH 1994 a I 50' E.5�'�t�l rT r �► E;" 7'lAt,,.,*Y**' �, A v 0 L ANDSCAPfD N , POS 4r. 61 - z All r.7..ol 4610,_f t 1 troy Z-��-- ­7 kl/ t j 1 , a i - r� 'i. -- -f - - r �S 7.. ... r i., 1 a, I i.. . L AND.5'CAPEI> L� _l'__._,___ _._ _ __. Fes•_► /� fir^ _ /�� sET,aAc,� EX15 T, { /N T,ER/OR 11 i/'L / T/L:S 70 6Z- UNDE R6RO "D, a EX/5'T. PA✓EMENT 762_ s r- s , • a i P6QT ./�,_. PAR U r. _ P +� Y Ve7 COI/A'7#qY C-1 IJ46 APR� f T " � E7�- 40Y Pit YNE/�,�',� �/�' L M DESEiQ 7" GiPfE/t/S� �' CIO VN,�/'� y' � IV40USE TA ' / V q / of ! 1 �,�, , a' _..- o• O� �� �2„ 0.4�� �� /2„ �l ��, 2390/ -tea. �� ,� C ,� " -- /N 5 PH,�SES / 9 ,S/NGL E �!M L Y ES T/.�L , \ 220 RENTAL UN/TS) /70 e /7/ ML1L T/- F4 /L Y DES/DEAIT/A17 s. EX/57' ESM T TO titi� _ M SO• CAL/F �� 9 �`� P 7 �' �' \ �I �-~~ ?z \ .�- 0.4 Jig I o47I 2 i (1�� .,-r - \ I 17 C. . W. W LL S/TE .. •,. \ z 6 f Y D E 0.5 9` .3z !off , h PA 234•S \ o `9- °.! �Q�o _•_ Y9 1 N ll a l�z PAS ; ; �� ; Ae "`. L_-4 At 14F. A,',/E O.Aln• i_,wp5cA,or 5rRt_P) / . 7 /2 75 . h - , �• ^ •� 90: :, - - /EsC c. P 3 TO/AL UN/T COUNT Of 389 BASED ON /NCLUD/NG fX/ST/NG F/RE STAT/ON I. v fX/ST 20 EStiIT FOR 22 Q i __ �. fir' - �� �. �,�' \ ' V _.._ _ T''E:✓ . __. 0 Lff��'E i f ROADWAY PU.PPOSES �, � . AC" � ��• �\ v I � •�9' � O � �� - / 9 O� � - \ -� � �\ � � � � �- ,_q ""`' � ;-= t�• i i /ta^75 SO 2c _ - tl VA -� \ ` 29, 1116 7 I , , _ _ - /�'` P♦4c �- l .� Q � �' I vJ I /4 v o. `� C - 4 sr a EX/ST. .50 fSM T FOP PUBL/C / ,f 132 225 - 2p h 23. /QOAD car\. UT/L/7Y PV�PPOSE`5 • ( � v, �y PA 'IF 2` ' Eti t v'. \ 2.a te r � 2 l \ X/ST. 30♦�.E`SM7' / 8 2 `� to ti \ \tip'; ♦ O I T IUq Y 1 .; /oc -. �_ . t 7? f 73 t� S•D. I 04�t ` 1 VA a 1 _ � yV PA 'v; ??E.l I f 5� \ _ �G �l `� y" /• Q - V f /\ ti• `? F `1 — Pi4 R a i7 4 t n \ i r / . ;aa, 4°h •,� / / ! PA C a \ �"_ PAi.' p' a. . -!_ 0w .o ,e3 f '�', f , McBA/L COMPAN � (`\ 22 , •.. c__ ""'� \\\�� � � -;` 1 � H 1 � � �, \''� '. p � _• _ � `- -.._ s.. .,. ..:...ate.. _ . �l � I,c., 3200 DANY/LLE BLVD. SU/TE 200 ,` �` \ `- �� c'r+` + ..•. 2t.1. b� G C i _... G �L �� ALAMO CA 94507 '/9!¢�2* \ A r \ t r. _. _.. e 24 VID — 22 ES ( SC��l�/VIDCR UN @ 1 D/N 1>EL'ELOPMENT CO. - �. + I o 4� K ¢� 22 �t, yAo l 5 i - \ k 2350/ PAR,t' SORRENTO, SU/TE P07 �,, lti� I U 29 \ a- - -z,z �-e �..� \�� _ ., ,p�,,,-'fir' I ;� �J 3 + 'y 220./ ``�. '�r 3 CALA 9/302 -� T. BASAS CA �C + oo •f PAt y \k �� v l ✓ 111AI 1" t;•�_.L7 Pro c= r j� - �c.- op 6c ' r8� \a;�' ,.�•�' ��� 68/ .3'��0 ' / 7a y It v � \ , �! Z�¢ � � C1 \� o � \ ... � �� ,�,' 9C ,•�l + I� N� U { `� ; -��,,� Z,.`. � t�`a: 4,r `- At Alm" A& I ,� .:., 'lu � / C,.. C � \ � ( � '�' y 1 �� � /: f 2! �^ t /`f 4� � ��6 `1.v/1�A..� ►..., ... -\� - 't � 11"�v *� #'fir c 2 +• , /ap^ 12=� c` �..' - 1 �_ ,•. � . �//� i 22 ,�• \ � � ��" � 5 �� 218 ; � 2/�• �.-- e�" ; , � 1 , 7 G '(l\ l /ems" /° 7 /J (� + (, G.t? F# ` tt �2. Cr \/ r' V ' � I'� � � • ,.,. .. .. �.: �SO� � i .��►. L� ,' .4-.. °./)\ \\1 q � 1 o,.. _ 'f /�:•` ✓' ° 1 ��S ' p2 r ` V Ii \ —N�i A5E/r1ErfJ tyl. "i+ `�?'/ \ ' `a + . .h \ �nj \[`<r `y' -s ! � _____�--..___ .. --- ---- - —. ,• � - - ' ♦ ,ate � -D - _.. e-� „'\ 4/4 Pfti-2 t Br � tau / � , ar� �,�.9' S.•...,/� . ..... �.r. .,� r 5 0 �� z/z --��►.� '� R 24 �2/ (y ` '�= � ' � 28 29 30 �' 32 5 \ r O b- . 2 :Y` Q V • V t t ar �• o'." �' � � �G;� �^� '�, c. � �/tG �1 � D .i � � O o• P C,. °. � 2/ •s �e ��� � �.�g,..' tL S -}- I �✓` 1! ;`' � _.,fl, --- _ _ N l i'� 2 2 l : t _ _. 1 1 - 'a �`�'_ - \ 2/7•Z ' 2/ rl v ,> ry 1 e r-- — - -r— — — ,, \ — —-, r- —--� h/�� Lc r �o' �F.f��/�.3 I 2> ati �� _I � �F,�i/z.s� � � (�.F(uo. � lam' �� I i �- . 2a5 9�g � CAS�IBL A MCA00- 6 E .55 OR T L FGAL "fter- R 00�47/0, N k4 04 r t A IC 3 N�.�, r) ,d C k�E,' 76. 8 - Pl�'•/4 Tt ��I 0f T� /1 J T / �s �" �22 - 020 - 3 -46 T/O4' T 6 R 6 E, 9 9 �f T 40.4 T F APRIL, /989 r • i � � � .•u.....•.r.+.vr.�, � J � • / 4� I ( � • � L�_—•r..,..,! •+a.e,... S l..,w....® 1 Y &' 4.t:," g f! n - 4 Y I