Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTT 24632 COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE HOMES FILE 3 1998 IRV PFiECI:JE PLAN TENTATIVE TRACT ZONE CHANGE PARCEL MAP x ^ , 'VARIANCE " REFER � : APPLICANT: LOCATION : REQUEST k' EXISTING ZONE: PREPARATION PROGRESS G' DATE BY COMMENTS APPLICATION RECEIVED LEGAL PUBLICATION SENT NOTICES SENT FIELD INVESTIGATION E DEPTS. NOTIFIED BUILDING _ ENGINEERING FIRE _ POLICE IRECREATION &. PARKS aj SCHOOL I DISTRICT DIVISION; OF HIGHWAYS FLOOD CONTROL st1, PRELIMINARY MEETING ""f"'"C :1 l STAFF REPORT vDiz v/-- , I { FINAL PLAN APPROVAL PRECISE PLAN (6) LANDSCAPING PLAN (5) i! PLAN. DIRECTOR MOD. (6) HEARINGS & ACTIONS DATE . ACTION VOTE REVIEW BOARD HEARING P.C. HEARING PUBLISHED P.C. PUBLIC HEARING APPLICANT NOTIFIED C.C. PUBLIC HEARING F � ORDINANCE NO. I RESOLUTION NO. I EFFECTIVE :, DATE L. RECORDED'. FOR DATA- BANK ZONING MAP CORRECTED City ®f Palm Desert 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260-2578 TELEPHONE(760)346-0611 •FAX(760)340-0574•http://www.paim-desert.org PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NOTICE OF ACTION Date: April 8, 1998 Michael Gallagher McBail Company 3200 Danville Boulevard Suite 200 Alamo, CA 94507-1914 Re: TT 24632 The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of April 7, 1998: It was moved by Commissioner Finerty, seconded by Commissioner Fernandez, to approve the request for a one-year extension of TT 24632. Motion carried 5-0. Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Community Development, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. PHILIP DRELL, SECRETARY PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION cc: Coachella Valley Water District Public Works Department Building & Safety Department Fire Marshal Ppx McBAIL COMPANY 12 March 1998 RECEIVE® MAR 16 1998 City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Drive COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTDEPNRfIAENT; L Palm Desert, California CITY OF PALM DESERT 92260 Attn: Steve Smith Ref: Extension of TTM 24632 Mr. Smith: The above-referenced Tentative Tract Map expires on 17 May 1998 . The original approval was in 1994. We hereby request the maximum extension. Please advise if you have any questions. , ncerely, MCBAIL COMPANY &Gae Directolopment 3200 DANVILLE BLVD., SUITE 200 ALAMO, CALIFORNIA 94507-1914 P.O. BOX 1056 510-838-1460 • FAX 510-838-2013 i City of Palm Desert 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260-2578 TELEPHONE(619)346-0611 FAX(619)341-7098 January 21 , 1997i JAN 23 1997 VIS ASSOCIAX S Robert C. Vatcher V/S Associates 42-280 Beacon Hill, Suite D-3 Palm Desert, California 92211 Re: January 9, 1997 Letter Tentative Tract Map 24632 Amendment No. 2 Dear Mr. Vatcher: This letter is to confirm that the expiration date for Tentative Tract Map 24632 Amendment No. 2 is May 17, 1998. If you have any additional questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, PHILIP DRELL DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT /tm i ter:4> �i 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE(619)346-0611 January 9, 1990 ARCHITECIURAL REVIEW IXMMISSION ACTION CASE NO. . TT 24632 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): WATT INDUSTRIES, Post Office Box 2026, Palm Springs, CA 22263 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUQIT: Preliminary approval of landscape, entries, and model home plans £or subdivision LOCATION: Southwest corner of Portola Avenue and Country Club ZONE: PR-5 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Upon reviewing the submitted plans and presentations by staff and by the applicant, the architectural ccmaission referred request back to applicant to make following revisions: 1) Maximum height for single story home to be 18 feet 2) Height of two-story units be brought down in proportion to the single story units. 3) Applicant to follow city's latest drought resistant landscaping plan Date of Action: January 9, 1990 Vote: Carried 4-1, Chairman Gregory abstaining (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen ( 15 ) days of the date of the decision. ) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- STAFF CONNIENTS: It is your responsibility to submit the plans approved by the architectural ccnudssion to the department of building and safety. CONTINUED CASES: In order to be placed on the next meetings agenda, new or revised plans must be submitted no later than 9:00 a.m. the Monday prior to the next meeting. AGENDA ITEM NO.: IV-B-1 DATE: January 9, 1990 ARCHITEICiURAL REVIEW CCD14 SSICN CASE NO.: TT 24632 APPLICANT (ARID ADDRESS): WATT IMUSTRIES, Post Office Box 2026, Palm Springs, CA 92263 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of landscape, entries, and model home plans for subdivision LOCATION: Southwest corner of Portola Avenue and Country Club Drive ZONE: PR-5 The applicant has submitted a tentative tract map to subdivide the 76.8 acre site at the southwest corner of Portola Avenue and Country Club Drive into 176 single family lots and a 213 unit multi-family residential project. This map will be before planning commission January 16, 1990. The request before ARC is to review and approve preliminary plans for perimeter landscape treatment, entry landscape treatment, typical front yard landscape plans and preliminary elevations of four (4) models to be included in the subdivision. Generally, architectural plans for models are reviewed after the approval of the tentative tract map; there plans are not of your usual 18 foot high single story residence and hence the applicant wishes early review prior to the map being reviewed by planning commission. Staff will not attempt to describe the proposed architecture but will allow the applicant to do so at the meeting. We will indicate that the proposed tomes will be located within a gated private om munity, on approximately 8,000 to 10,000 square foot lots which will front onto 36 foot wide private streets. The proposed 1 and 2 story structures range from 22 to 27 feet in height and would have a min mien front setback of 20 feet, rear at 15 feet and sides totally 14 feet, minimum of 5 feet. Planning Commission has been quite reluctant to approve tentative maps where two-story single family residents are proposed. ARCHITECTURAL CCNMISSICN CASE NO. TP 24632 JANUARY 9, 1990 This proposal couples two-story units (i.e. 44 of then - 25% of the total) and proposes 22-23 foot high single story units whereas typical R-1 units don't exceed 18 feet. The PR-5 zone does permit two-story units with a maximum height of 30 feet. Staff's concern is with the 22-23 foot high single story units proposed along the south portion of the development adjacent to Casa Blanca. Due to grade changes, units in this development will be from 2 to 6 feet higher than the units in Casa Blanca and consequently staff feels that the units in this area should be redesigned with heights not exceeding 18 feet. Within the remainder of the project, staff is satisfied that adjacent properties will not be negatively impacted. RECCD14ENMTICN• That the co muission review preliminary plans for tentative tract 24632 and grant conceptual landscape plan approval and conceptual architectural plan approval of the one and two-story units subject to the following condition; 1) That the single story units to be constructed adjacent to the Casa Blanca development be redesigned with a height not to exceed 18 feet. SS/db DUTAYrFS ARCUTECIURAL REVIEW Cx 4UMICK JANUARY 9, 1990 IACATICN: 73-954 Highway 111 ZONE: Cl Business is 21' wide which provides it with a maximum sign limit of 21 square feet. Proposed sign has a total of 30 square feet. Chairman Gregory suggested that the bottom of the Sign be cut-off removing the menu information. Applicant asked if he would be able to use two rows of lettering if an awning was used. Ccmnissicn was open to the idea of using an awning for this location. Steve Smith informed applicant that he had a ten (10) day limit on preparing an awning proposal. It was moved by Cacmissioner Urrutia, seconded by Ccmnissioner McCrea, to approve the sign with the following conditions: 1) Deletion of bottom line of copy ("Lower Prices" and "Quality Service") 2) Background to be dark brown 3) Size of sign be brought into code conformance 4. CASE NO.: 1687 SA APPLICANT (ARID ADDRESS): TOOLS, ETC. 1567 So. Harbor Blvd., Fullerton, CA 92632 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SCUGU: Identification sign approval IOMTICN: 74-271 Highway ill ZC NE: C-1 It was moved by Chairman Gregory, seconded by Ccmnissioner McCrea, to approve the request with the condition that the red lettering be changed to dark burgundy. Carried 5-0. 5. CASE NO.: TT 24632 APPLICANT (ARID ADDRESS); L6�TT_INDUSTRIES;�Post Office Box 2026, Palm Springs, CA 92263 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of landscape, entries, and model home plans for subdivision 4 MINUTES ARQ-IITECIURAL REVMA C 244ISSICN JANUARY 9, 1990 LOCATION: Southwest corner of Portola Avenue and Country Club ZONE: PR-5 Applicant, Brad Boe, requested approval of additional height limits to units immediately adjacent to Casa Blanca project. Mr. Bow requested that the units be 21' and 22' on the single story units noting that the majority of the units would not be seen from Country Club Drive. Applicant felt that the views of the mountains from Casa Blanca would not be blocked by these units. Chairman Gregory asked what the height of the Casa Blanca units were, which Mr. Smith reported was 161 . Caumissioner Urrutia felt that the city has put an 18' height limit on units and this should be conformed to. He felt the applicant could achieve the look he wanted within the 18' height limit. Ccmnissioner Holden noted that the city also has to look at sun control and felt the applicant should provide some type of relief on the windows. It was moved by Coumissiouer Urrutia, seconded by Ccmnissioner McCrea, to refer request back to applicant to make the following revisions: 1) Maximum height for single story home to be 18 feet 2) Height of two-story units be brought down in proportion to the single story units 3) Applicant to follow city's latest drought resistant landscaping plan for the median islands on Country Club Drive and Portola Avenue. Carried 4-1, a;,,na Gregory abstaining. 6. CASE NO.: TT 25639 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): ROELOO DEVELOPMENT, 2 Park Plaza, Suite 800, Irvine, CA 92714 NATURE OF PROJECP/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary landscape plans LOCATION: Cook Street north of Country Club Drive ZONE: PR-5 Case was continued as applicant was not present 5 F AGENDA ITEM NO.: IV-B-1 DATE: January 9, 1990 ARCFIITECIURAL REVIEW CMIESSION CASE NO.: Tr 24632 APPLICANT (ARID ADDRESS): WATT INDUSTRIES, Post Office Box 2026, Palm Springs, CA 92263 NATURE OF PiOMM/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of landscape, entries, and model home plans for subdivision LOCATION: Southwest corner of Portola Avenue and Country Club Drive ZONE: PR-5 The applicant has submitted a tentative tract map to subdivide the 76.8 acre site at the southwest corner of Portola Avenue and Country Club Drive into 176 single family lots and a 213 unit multi-family residential project. This map will be before planning conu ssion January 16, 1990. The request before ARC is to review and approve preliminary plans for perimeter landscape treatment, entry landscape treatment, typical front yard landscape plans and preliminary elevations of four (4) models to be included in the subdivision. Generally, architectural plans for models are reviewed after the approval of the tentative tract map; there plans are not of your usual 18 foot high single story residence and hence the applicant wishes early review prior to the map being reviewed by planning commission. Staff will not attempt to describe the proposed architecture but will allow the applicant to do so at the meeting. We will indicate that the proposed hones will be located within a gated private community, on approximately 8,000 to 10,000 square foot lots which will front onto 36 foot wide private streets. The proposed 1 and 2 story structures range from 22 to 27 feet in height and would have a minimum mi vm front setback of 20 feet, rear at 15 feet and sides totally 14 feet, minimum of 5 feet. Planning Commission has been quite reluctant to approve tentative maps where two-story single family residents are proposed. ARCHITECTURAL C I-MSSICN CASE NO. TT 24632 JANUARY 9, 1990 This proposal couples two-story units (i.e. 44 of them - 25% of the total) and proposes 22-23 foot high single story units whereas typical R-1 units don't exceed 18 feet. The PR-5 zone does permit two-story units with a maximum height of 30 feet. Staff's concern is with the 22-23 foot high single story units proposed along the south portion of the development adjacent to Casa Blanca. Due to grade changes, units in this development will be from 2 to 6 feet higher than the units in Casa Blanca and consequently staff feels that the units in this area should be redesigned with heights not exceeding 18 feet. Within the remainder of the project, staff is satisfied that adjacent properties will not be negatively impacted. REOOMENDATICN: That the commission review preliminary plans for tentative tract 24632 and grant conceptual landscape plan approval and conceptual architectural plan approval of the one and two-story units subject to the following condition: 1) That the single story units to be constructed adjacent to the Casa Blanca development be redesigned with a height not to exceed 18 feet. SS/db li f '�AA11T11/ 1. h � qq r 1 a� Da „� v •, < w i of � t 33a 7 , Cu N OL ( 1 r III h � � . � 3�. •y rl� � �' ., �- �.�� 9 nv r l�. ��:ti uj Xv ID AF�`p f•; ate• y, _'� / `� .fir �';�d - . ,.l•: � R a - - ���--- � , ~ . m X only b PIN-� W xM� apu ro i Mbv 11J/JmMM "� I J,/ vYJv.gM�iG 7wnova Y2M gM�f� aoJaOi I i 4MAtlM� Mt = i V/S ASSOCIATES e*oweeww • ruw o • W W"No 000h Swam&Oma .PWk 42 s..00n HN sukt D-1 ;:: Dwet,CA 02M ro191 s4i-isge Letter of Transmittal To: Date Sept. 199 1989 Steve Smith Job No. LUN002-001-02 City of Palm Desert Project Tr. 24632 Planning Department Country Clb & Portola Transmitted herewith by C ] MAIL CXI MESSENGER C I OTHER 1 . GERMAIN AVENUE �IP 2. ESCRER STREET 9 MICHELANGELO DRIVE 4. LUNDIN DRIVE L 5 GAUGUIN AVENUE J B GOYA COURT lM U 7. MONNET AVENUE J S. RUBENS COURT J 9 GIOVANNI 'DRIVE 10. RAPHAEL CIRCLE Remarks : inclosed is a print of the overall project with street names shown as listed above for street name approval, with alternate list of names as follows: CEZANNE AVE. , RENOIR DR. , REMBRANDT AVE. , VAN GOON DR. , REMINGTON STREET, AND ROCKWELL DR. Your immediate attention to this matter is appreciated. Thank you much. Rec' d by Date Lycia R. Shino}iara City of Palm Desert TO: Joe Gaugush, Senior Engineer FRCM: Steve Smith, Associate Planner DATE: October 19, 1989 SUBJECT: TT 24632 Traffic Study October 18, 1989 we received a copy of Mr. Safavian's critique of the above noted traffic study. This traffic study, we assume, was prepared in response to your condition number 21 imposed on the approval of TT 24632. While we agree with Mr. Safavian's criticisms of the study and his suggestion that a meeting be arranged, this department does not wish to be involved in the meetings between the applicant's traffic engineer and the city's transportation engineer. We would obviously be interested in any mitigation measures which may be proposed which would substantially alter or impact on the map layout. I£ we can be of any assistance, please do not hesitate to call. Steve Smith Associate Planner /tm cc. s�yPc/ NOTICE OF DETE WIInII,TION Negative Declaration TO: 00 County Clerk ( ) Secretary for Resources County of Riverside 1416 Ninth St., Roan 1311 4050 Main Street Sacramento, CA 95814 Riverside, CA 92507 FR(M: City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, Ca 92260 SUBJECP: Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108 or 21152 of the public resources code. Project Title/Camton Name: Lundin Development/TT24632 Date of Project Approval: July 5, 1989 State Clear gbouse Nwd)er (if submitted): Contact Person: Steve Smith Project Location: Southwest corner Portola and Country Club Drive Project Description: 169 single family lots and 220 future apartment units This is to advise that the City of Palm Desert has made the following determin- ations regarding the above described project: 1. The project ( )will, 00will not, have a significant effect on the environment. 2. An environmental impact report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. A copy of the negative declaration may be examined at the above city hall address. _( _A negative declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions f p o CEQp.. A copy of the negative declaration may be examined at the above city hall address. 3. Mitigation measures Mwere, ( )were not, made a condition of the approval of the project. CLERK OF THE BOARO NOS De4ara oration 4. A statement of overriding considerations ( )was, 00wasrrhot �acbp 2 for this project. p 0 60AR+D Ol- SUFERvi;;or- OCT2 01909 �a ll Signature Title Removed: !Z �57 OCT �,y Date Received for Filing �b'mRi"rside,Stateo,C,,,rnia CL Do,� C,,",ts;e o'Crl#nms CITY OF PALM DESERT DEPAR ME TT OF CU44JNITY DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Carmission DATE June 6, 1989 CASE NO: TT 24632 REQUEST: Approval of a tentative tract map subdividing 77.8 gross acres into 169 single family lots and 2 additional lots set aside for 220 future apartment units at the southwest corner of Portola Avenue and Country Club Drive. APPLICANT: Lundin Development, Co. 23501 Park Sorrento, Suite 207 Calabasas, CA 91302 Ferguson Engineering 46-414 Roudel Avenue La Quinta, CA 92253 I. BACKMU UND: A. DESCRIPTION OF SITE: The site is a vacant 78 +/- acre property which slopes from north to south. B. ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE: North: Residential/Palm Desert Greens South: PR-5/Casablanca East: PR-4/Silver Sands Racquet Club West: AHDPR-22/San Tropez Apartments C. ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: The site is zoned PR-5, five dwelling units per acre and the general plan designation is residential low density (3-5 dwelling units per acre). The zoning is consistent with the general plan. D. ZONE REQUIREMENTS: The plan as submitted is unique in that it proposes a total of 389 dwelling units split between 3.75 units per acre detached single family subdivision (169 units on 45 acres) and a 7.9 units per acre �aparhnent complex (220 units on 27.9 acres). The PR zone allows density to be determined based on gross acreage and hence the total of 389 permitted dwelling units (77.8 acres x 5 units per acre). STAFF REPORT TT 24632 JUNE 6, 1989 This property is zoned PR-5. Section 25.24.190 permits commission to impose such conditions it deems necessary to carry out the general purpose of the section. Part of this development is for a single family subdivision and, therefore, staff feels it is appropriate to establish standards for this project consistent with the R-1 standards. R=1 Standards Minimum lot area 8000 square feet Minimum lot width 70 feet Minimum lot depth none Minimum dwelling unit size 1000 square feet Maximum height 18 feet Maximum coverage limit 35% Minimum front yard 20 feet Minimum rear yard 15 feet Minimum side yard Total 14 feet-minimum 5 feet Minimum street side yard 10 feet The 169 lots as proposed conform to the minimum required lot area, lot width and lot depths as prescribed in the ordinance. The design of the future hones on these lots will be required to conform to the other standards noted above. II. PROJECT LAYOUT: The apartment section and the single family portion are each provided with one access onto Portola Avenue and there is one access onto Country Club. The north-south access street into the single family area aligns with the existing signal and entry to Palm Desert Greens to the north. In addition, this north-south street provides access to the apartment complex before the street enters the single family area. III. ANALYSIS: A. FINDINGS NEEDED FOR APPROVAL OF THE TENTATIVE TRACT MAP: 1. That the proposed map is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. Justification: The proposed map is consistent with the zoning and the zoning is consistent with the general plan. Compliance with the conditions and mitigation measures will assure consistency with the general plan. 2 STAFF REPORT TT 24632 JUNE 6, 1989 2. That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. Justification: All public streets will be dedicated and improved and sufficient drainage facilities will be provided in conformance with the general plan guidelines and city ordinances. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the type of development. Justification: The 77.8 acre site is of sufficient size to accommodate the proposed project and the topography of the site does not create significant problems. 4. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development. Justification: The design of the project indicates that the site is suitable for the proposed density of development because the site can be served by respective utilities and, as conditioned, to provide full traffic circulation and is designed in compliance with all city codes. 5. The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. Justification: The design will not cause substantial environmental damage or injure fish or wildlife or their habitat because it will be constructed in compliance with applicable regulations and the proposed negative declaration has determined that there will be no related adverse environmental effect which cannot be mitigated. 6. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems. Justification: The design will not cause serious public health problems because it will be in compliance with applicable health, safety and building codes. 3 STAFF REPORT TP 24632 JUNE 6, 1989 7. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. Justification: There has been an easement acquired by the public at large for access or use of property within the proposed subdivision. The easement is no longer deemed necessary and will be removed by means of a quit claim. 8. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not restrict solar access to the property. Justification: The project has been designed to conform to code requirements and will not impact solar access to adjacent properties and will provide adequate solar access to this property. IV. ENVIROPN4NIAL REVIEW: The director of oanm mty development has determined that the proposed Project will not have a significant effect on the environment and a negative declaration of environmental impact has been prepared. V. RBCL744ENIDATICN• A. Adoption of the findings. B. Adoption of Planning Commission Resolution No. approving TP 24632, subject to conditions. VI. ATTACHM NPS: A. Draft resolution. B. Legal notice. C. Negative declaration. D. Plans and exhibits. Prepared by ` Reviewed and Approved 1 /tm 4 . CASE =MIRON?IE'NTAL SERVICES DEPT. INITIAL STUDY Z VIROM[L7AL SVALUATI011 C3ECXLIST NOTE: The availability of data necessary to address the below shall form the basis of a decisi topics listed application is considered complete on as to whether the assessment. for purposes of environmental F—NVIRORMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers, possible mitigation measures and comments are provided on attached sheets) . Yes Maybe No I . Earth. Will the proposal result in: _ a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? -- _ b. Disruptions, displacements , compaction, or overcovering of the soil ? c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? / . d. The destruction; covering, or modification _ 1/ Of any unique geologic or physical features? r/ e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors? c. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? _ — / Yes Maybe NoL 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: Changes. in currents, 'or the course or 4 ` direction of water movements? r' . b. Changes in-absorpt-ton rat s , drainage Patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? / C. Alterations to the course or flow. of !/ flood waters? / d, Alteration Of-the direction or rate of v flow of ground waters? e. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or with- I drawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? f. Reduction in the amount of water other. wise available for public water supplies? 4. Plante e• Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of plants (inc�cluding trees , shrubs , grass , and b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or endangered species of plants? c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area , or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? 5. Animal. Will the proposal result in' a. Changes in the diversity of species, or — —numbers of any species of animals (birds , land animals including reptiles , or insects)? b: Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or endangered species of animals? C. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration to existing wildlife habitat? v �' s. 3. 6. Natural Resources. Yes M�be No Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in :.the rate of use of any natural resources? b. Depletion of any non-renes„able natural resource? 7. Enerev. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? b. Demand upon existing sources of energy, or re- quire the.deselopment of new sou of energy? / 8. Risk of Uoset. • Does the proposal involve a v risk o an explosion or the release of , hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, pesticides,the event of ail , chemicals, or radiation) in an accident or upset conditions? g. E^onort_ ,1_ 'cis Will the proposal result in: a. A change in 'the value of property and improvements endangered by flooding? / b. A change in the value of property and improvements exposed to geologic hazards beyond accepted .cor.:r:unity risk standards? 10. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing v noise levels to the point at which accepted COMMunity noise and vibration levels are exceeded? ii. Land 'use. Wi11 ..the proposal result in the a tI e on of the present developed or planned land use of an area? 12. Ooen Soace. Will the proposal lead to a decry jn the �emount of designated open space? 13. Pooui l Will the proposal result in: a. Alteration or the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human Population of the City? b. Change in the population distribution by age. income, religion, racial , or ethnic group, occupational class, household type? _ _ / 4. Yes Mavbe No iona 14. Emolovment. Will the proposal result in addtt ,new long-term jobs provided, or a Change in the number and per cant employed, unemployed, and underemployed? 15. Housing. Will the proposal result in: a- Change in number and per cent of housing units by type (price or rent range, zoning category, owner-occupied and rental , etc. ) relative to demand or to number of families in various income classes in the City? _ b. Impacts on existing housing or creation of a demand for additional housing? 16. Transoortation/Circulation. Will the proposal resu t tn: a. Generation of additional vehicular movement? r/ b. Effects on existing parking facilities , or demand for new parking? c. Impact upon existing transportation systems? d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? e. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , bicyclists , or pedestrians? 17. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon , or resu t in a need for, new or altered governmental services in any of the following a. Fire protection? b. Police protection? c. Schools? d. Parks or other recreational facilities? e. Maintenance of public facilities , including roads? f. Other governmental services? '/ 18. Public Fiscal Balance. Will the proposal Yes MaybeNo result in a net change in government fiscal flow (revenues less operating expenditures and annualized capital expenditures)? / 19. Utilities. Will the - - v need for new proposal in a systems , or alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? ? b. Communications system? —" c. Water? d. Sewer or septic tanks? v e. Storm water drainage? f. Solid waste and disposal? 20. Human nth Will the proposal result in: a. The creation Of any health hazard or Potential health hazard? b. A change in the level of community health (/ care provided? 21 . Social Services. Will the proposal result in an increased denand for provision of general _ social services? / 22. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in: a. Obstruction of any scenic vista view open to the public? b. The creation of an aesthetically Offensive site open to public view? . / c. Lessening of the overall neighborhood v(or area ) attractiveness and uniqueness? Pleazantness, 23. Liaht and Glar.. Will the proposal produce ne:v fight or g are? 24. Archea7coica]/,Historical . Will the proposal arch t in an a teration of a significant archeological or historical site, stre object, Or building? , / 6. Yes Maybe No 25. Mandatory Findings of Significance; a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment or to curtail the diversity in the environment? b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental •goals? (A short-term impact an the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future. ) I C. Does the project have impacts which are indi- vidually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small , but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant. ) d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings , either directly or indirectly? Initial Study Prepared By: a f INITIAL STUDY CASE NO. TT 24632 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION CHECKLIST CCMWrS AND POSSIBLE MITIGATION MEASURES (CATEGORIES PERTAIN TO ATTACHED CHEC,FQ,IST) 1. EARTH a. The project will result in grading. Said grading will not result in any alterations to geologic substructures nor create unstable earth conditions in that all grading will be pursuant to the grading ordinance. b. As part of the normal grading activity soil will be moved, displaced, over-covered and compacted. This activity will be cone per permit and approved grading plans to assure that the site is properly prepared for the structural development which will take place on the site. C. The site slopes from north to south and changes in topography and surface relief will be required to assure proper drainage and avoid increased runoff to adjoining properties. The after condition of the property will result in less water runoff from the property to adjoining properties, and better direction. d. The site does not contain any unique geologic or physical features. e. The project as stated previously will result in less potential water damage to the site, through proper grading resulting in the appropriate directing of runoff from the site. Mitigation Measures The City of Palm Desert grading and building permits procedures require detailed geotechnical reports addressing grading specifications and the settlement and expansive characteristics of on-site soils. All structures must be designed by UBC requirements to insure that the buildings are constructed within the acceptable level of risk set forth therein for the type of building and occupancies being developed. 2. AIR a. During construction, particularly grading, a potential dust problem will be a short-term impact. Requiring that the ground be moistened during days in which grading occurs will mitigate this problem. This is required by City of Palm Desert Grading Ordinance. Because the site is already an urbanized setting its development will not result in an overall deterioration of ambient air quality. This conclusion is supported by the, discussions relating to air quality contained in a 1985 draft environmental impact report prepared for INITIAL STUDY TT 24632 the City of Rancho Mirage by Michael Brandman Associates entitled "Park View Drive Land Use Study". b. The proposed development does not call for any odorous land uses. C. Development of this site will not result in any climatic changes. This is due to its size and identified uses. 3. WATER a. Water will be redirected to drainage facilities designed and constructed to accept the water from the site. b. The site will absorb less water due to ground coverage. The landscaped areas will absorb water because of the plant material. The alterations in drainage patterns will result in a benefit to adjoining property as it will be directed in a control manner. C. See b. d. There is no.ground water present on the site. e. See d. £. While any development results in the use of water and, therefore, reduces the amount otherwise available for public water supplies; the Coachella Valley Water District assures that there is sufficient water supplies to accommodate this growth. 4. PLANT LIFE a. The project when completed will introduce a diversity of species to the site. The plants that will be introduced to the site will, however, be material previously used in the desert. b. The site does not contain any unique, rare or endangered species of plant life. C. It is extremely doubtful that the project will introduce any new species into the area. In any event the landscape plan will be reviewed by the architectural inspector of Riverside County to assure that the plants being used do not pose a hazard to agricultural production in the area. 2 INITIAL STUDY TT 24632 5. ANIMAL LIFE a. The project will not increase or decrease the variety of animal life on the site. b. The site does contain habitat for the fringe-toed lizard, an endangered specie. As mitigation the applicant will be required to pay $600 per acre to the Nature Conservancy for use in acquiring habitat area north of I-10. C. See b and c. d. The project site is an in-fill site and not a suitable habitat for wildlife. 6. NATURAL RESOURCES a. The project will obviously use natural resources, but will not increase the rate of usage of these resources. b. All material resources used on the site are renewable. 7. a. & b. No more than normal usage. In addition, since the project will be required to carply with the most current state energy codes, energy usage will be less than on previous projects of a similar nature. 8. The site does not contain any substances that could result in explosion or escape of hazardous materials. 9. a. As discussed earlier the project will have a positive impact in terms of drainage impacts on adjacent properties. b. Properties in the area are not subject to unusual geologic hazards. The project will not effect that hazard. 10. NOISE Construction and subsequent use as single family dwellings and apartments will increase ambient noise level. The increase will not create a long term annoyance to the adjacent residential properties. Mitigation Measures Strict adherence to construction hours and days will be required. 3 INITIAL STUDY TT 24632 11. LAND USE The project will not alter the present developed land use in the area. The planned land use for the area is identified as low density residential; the project would develop land uses permitted in the low density residential land use designation (5 du/acre). 12. OPEN SPACE The site in question is designated as low density residential; its development, therefore, will not result in a reduction in the amount of designated open space. Park fees collected from this development will be used to purchase park land or develop park land to serve this area. 13. POPULATION a. Developing single family lots and apartments in the area designated low density residential will not result in changes in location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the city's population. b. The project will not generate changes in the socio-economic characteristics of the area. 14. EMPLOYMENT While the project will provide a number of new jobs in terms of the value as a whole, in and of itself, it is minor. Most of the jobs created: gardeners, pool maintenance and other service personnel, however, will be filled by residents of the area or those who have come to the valley for other reasons. 15. HOUSING a. The project will not change the housing picture in the ommunity or region. This is based on the conclusions reached in items 13 and 14. b. None - covered in item 15 a. 16. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION a. Projected trip generation per single family dwelling unit per day is 10 for a total of 1690 trip ends and 6.1 per unit for apartments for 1342 trip ends. The proposed development then would result in a total of 3032 trip ends per day. As part of the conditions of approval the applicant shall be required to provide road improvements as provided by the circulation element of the general plan. 4 INITIAL STUDY TT 24632 b. All new single family dwellings are required to provide two covered parking spaces as well as on-street and driveway parking. The apartments will be required to provide one covered space/unit and one additional space per unit. C. Except for additional vehicular movements discussed above the project should not generate additional demands on existing transportation systems. In addition these systems have additional capacity to accept the traffic these projects will create. d. Principal access to the area will be via Portola Avenue and Country Club Drive. e. Implementation of the mitigation measures set forth by item 16a should result in positive impacts. 17. PUBLIC SERVICE a-f. None. The property is presently vacant. A commitment to urban uses was made as the area surrounding the study area has been developed, and the general plan and zoning maps designated the area for residential development. Infrastructure improvements (i.e. : streets and utilities) have been made and are adequate to serve the proposed development. The proposed land uses would increase the economic productivity of the land in terms of land efficiency and greater economic return generated from these uses, versus the current state of the land. 18. PUBLIC FISCAL BALANCE The project will result in a net increase on fiscal flow to the City of Palm Desert through an increase in the assessed value of the land. 19. UTILITIES All utilities have indicated an ability to serve the proposed development. 20. HUMAN HEALTH The project will not create hazard to human health in the long or short term nor will it impact the level of community health. 21. SOCIAL SERviCES The property will be developed with single family dwellings and apartments. Owners of these homes and apartments will pay substantial 5 INITIAL STUDY TT 24632 amounts of property tax and generally .have a low incidence of use of social services. Any increase in the demand for general social services will be minimal. 22. AESTHETICS a. The city grading ordinance and architectural review process take into account the effects development may have on adjacent properties and the views available from public streets. Care will be taken to assure that any impact on views from adjacent properties or scenic vistas will be minimized. b. The proposed single family dwellings must be approved by the Palm Desert Architectural review process. C. For reasons stated in items 22 a and b. 23. LIGHT AND GLARE a. New light will be produced but the effects will be minimal , 24. There has been no evidence of any archeological or historical significance of this site. In addition, state law requires that should any evidence be found during construction, construction must cease and the site cleared. 25. Because of the mitigation measures identified herein and required of the project, the proposal will not have a significant adverse impact on the environment. /tm 6 INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Department of Community Development/Planning Attention: Steve Smith FROM: Richard J. Folkers, Asst. City Manager/Public Works Director SUBJECT: TENTATIVE TRACT 24632, LUNDIN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY DATE: May 11, 1989 The following should be considered conditions of approval for the above- referenced project: (1) Drainage fees, in accordance with Section 26.49 of the Palm Desert. Municipal Code and Palm Desert Ordinance Number 507, shall be paid prior to recordation of final map. (2) Drainage facilities shall be provided, per Ordinance No. 218 and the Northside Area Drainage Master Plan, to the specifications of the Director of Public Works. (3) Storm drain construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study prepared by a registered civil engineer that is reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works prior to start of construction. (4) Signal.ization fees, in accordance with City of Palm Desert Resolution Nos. 79-17 and 79-55, shall be paid prior to recordation of final map. (5) Full public improvements, as required by Sections 26.40 and 26.44 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code, shall be installed in accordance with applicable City standards . (6) As required under Palm Desert Municipal Code Section 26.28, and in accordance with Sections 26.40 and 26.44, complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted to the Director of Public Works for checking approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. Offsite improvement plans to be approved by the Public Works Department and a surety posted to guarantee the installation of required offsit.e improvements prior to recordatio❑ of final map. Such offsite improvements shall include, but not be limited to, curb and gutter, asphalt paving and concrete sidewalk in an appropriate size and configuration and provisions for deceleration lanes at the all project entry points. . "As-built" plans shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Director of Public Works prior to the acceptance of the improvements by the city. (7) Improvement plans for water and sewer systems shall be approved by the respective service districts with "as-built" plans submitted to the Department of Public Works prior to project final. (8) All public improvements shall be inspected by the Department of Public Works and a standard inspection fee shall be paid prior to issuance of grading permits. (9) Landscaping maintenance on Country Club Drive shall be provided by the homeowners association. (10) Waiver of access to Country Club Drive except at approved locations shall be granted on the Final Map. (11) In accordance with Palm Desert Municipal Code Section 26.44, complete grading plans and specifications shall be submitted to the Director of Public Works for checking and approval prior to issuance of any permits. (12) In accordance with the Circulation Network of the City of Palm Desert 's General Plan, installation of one-half landscaped median island in Country Club Drive shall be provided. A cash payment in lieu of actual installation may be submitted at the option of the Director of Public Works. (13) Traffic safety striping on Country Club Drive and Portola Avenue shall be provided to the specifications of the Director of Public Works. A traffic control pla❑ must be submitted to, and approved by, the Director of Public Works prior to the placement of any pavement markings. (14) Full improvements of .interior streets based on residential street standards in accordance with Section 26.40 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code shall be provided. (15) Complete tract map shall be submitted as required by ordinance to the Director of Public Works for checking and approval and be recorded before issuance of any permits. (16) Any and all offsite improvements shall be preceded by the approval of plans and the issuance of valid encroachment permits by the Department of Public Works. (17) A complete preliminary soils investigation, conducted by a registered soils engineer, shall. be submitted to, and approved by, the Department of Public Works prior to the issuance of a grading permit. (18) Pad elevations, as shown on the tentative map are subject to review and modification in accordance with Chapter 27 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code. (19) As required under Sectio❑ 12.1.6 and Section 26.44 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code, all existing utilities shall be undergrounded per each respective utility districts recommendation. If determined to be unfeasible, applicant shall agree to participate in any future utility undergrounding district. (20) As required by Sections 26.32 and 26.40 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code, and in accordance with the Circulation Network of the City's General Plan, dedication of half-street right-of-way at 55 feet on Country Club Drive and 50 feet on Portola Avenue shall be provided on the final map. (21) Traffic analysis to be prepared for this project to address the specific impacts on existing circulation network (streets and intersections) as well as proposed street/intersection configuration. The report shall include specific mitigation measures and shall be reviewed and approved by the Public works Department prior to the approval of the final map or issuance of any permits associated with the project. (22) All required offsite improvements for this project shall be installed in conjunction with the first phase of development. In addition, construction of the interior loop street ( Portola Ave. to Country club Drive) shall coincide with first phase development. (23) The existing traffic signal located at Country Club Drive and Palm Greens Parkway shall be modified to accommodate the proposed four leg intersection. (24) Applicant shall agree to contribute their fair share to the assessed costs for the Cook Street Extension and Bridge Fund. A' i rCFZ RICHARD J. FOLKERS, P.E. (jsg11r2467Z.ia©I J RIVERSIDE COUNTY I7RE DEPARTMENT IN COOPERATION WITH THE `+ 4 s` cbuN?Ty CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY 'RIVERS/DEy.,-. AND FIRE PROTECTION A RAY HEB IEF 4L��0 6�G� EMr pF FlRE CHIEF V' 6�41f r1 Planning & Engineering Office MAY 9 198P-danning& Engineering Office 46-209 Oasis Street, Suite 405 4080 Lemon Street, Suite I IL COMMUNITY' DLVELOPMENT W, .,., ^0 Indio, CA 92201 CITY ("F PALM DESERT R&erside, CA 92501 (619) 342-8886 May 5, 1989 (714) 787-6606 To: Ray Diaz, Div. Comm. Dev/Planning Attn: Steve Smith Re: 7724632 Lundin Dev. Co. With respect to the conditions of approval regarding the above referenced T724632 , the Fire Department recommends the following fire protection measures be provided in accordance with Uniform Fire Code and/or- recognized Fire Protection Standards: The Fire Department is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commercial buildings per Uniform Fire Code Sec. d. 1O. 3O1C. Provide, or show there exists a water system capable of providing a potential fire flow of 2500 gpm and the actual fire flow available from any one hydrant connected to any given water main shall be 1500 gpm for 2 hours duration at 20 psi residual operating pressure, for apartment area. Provide a water system for the residential area that provides 1500 gpm fire flow(must be available from any one hydrant . A fire flow of15OOgpm for a 2 hour duration at 20 psi residual operating pressure must be available before any combustible material is placed on the job site. The required fire flow shall be available from a .Super hydrant (s) (6" x 4" x 2-1/2" x 2-1/2" ) , located not less than 25 ' nor more than 150 ' from any portion of the building(s) as measured along approved vehicular travelways. Hydrants installed below 3000 ' elevation shall be of the "wet barrel" type. A combination of on-site and off-site Super fire hydrants, (6" . x 4" x 2- 1/2" x 2-1/2" ) , will be required, located not less than 25 ' or more than ✓ 150 ' from any portion of the building(s) as measured along approved vehicular travelways. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant (s) in the system. The required fire flow may be adjusted at a later point in the permit process to reflect changes in design, construction type, area separations, or built-in fire protection measures. Prior to the application for a building permit, • the developer shall furnish the original and two copies of the water system plan to the. County Fire Department for review. No building permit shall be issued until the water 1 system plan has been approved by the County Fire Chief. Upon approval , the original will be returned. One copy will- be sent to the responsible — original will be returned. One copy will be sent to the responsible in�pecting authority. Plans shall conform to fire hydrant types, location and spacing, and the system shall meet the.jire fApw requirements. Plans shall be signed by a Registered Civil Engineer and may be-signed by the local water company with g the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Riverside County Fire Department . " y' Certain designated areas will be required to be maintained as fire lanes. Install portable fire extinguishers per NFPA, Pamphlet #10, but not less (0 than 2A10EC. in rating. All buildings shall be accessible by an all-weather roadway extending to _ ,.-ithin 150 ' of all portions of the exterior walls of the first story. The (` roadway shall be not Less than 24 ' of unobstructed width and & 6" Zsf , vertical clearance. Where parallel parking is allowed, the roadway shall ; be 36 ' wide with parking on both sides, 32 ' wide with parking on one side. ' Degd--enl roads in excess of150 ' shall be provided with a minimum 45 ' { radius turn-around (55 ' in industrial developments) . The minimum width of interior driveways for multi-family or apartment a . f4 feet wide when serving less than 100 units, no parallel parking; carports or garages allowed on one side only. foot wide when serving between 100 and 300 units; carports or garages allowed on both sides, no parallel parking. 30 feet wide when serving over 300 units or when parallel parking is allowed on one side. d. 36 feet wide when parallel parking is allowed on both sides. Al enever access into private property is controlled through use of _pates, arrinvE, guard houses or similar means, provision shall be made to facilitate access by emergency vehicles in a manner approved by the Fire Department . All controlled access devices that are power operated shall have a radio-controlled over-ride system capable of opening the gate when `j -xrtivated y a special transmitter located in emergency vehicles. Devices shall be equipped with backup power facilities to operate in the event of power failure. All controlled access devices that are not power operated shall also be approved by the Fire Department . Minimum opening width shall bo _ _ . with a minimum vertical clearance of 13 '6" . I�IDow! end streets over 500 ft are not permitted. Provide , adequate circulation in those areas. I Contact the Fire Department for a final inspection prior to occupancy. All questions regarding the meaning of these conditions should be referred to the Fire Department Fire Protection/Inspection Staff. , Sincerely, GLEN NEWMAN Ranger in Charge ?rtPY'otection ire Chief Byeder Specialist bb.7,' CITY OF PALM DESERT DEPARTW11T OF OCM4 LAITY DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission DATE: July 5, 1989 CASE NO: TT 24632 REQUEST: Approval of a tentative tract map subdividing 77.8 gross acres into 169 single family lots and 2 additional lots set aside for 220 future aparbTent units at the southwest corner of Portola Avenue and Country Club Drive. APPLICANT: Lundin Development, Co. 23501 Park Sorrento, Suite 207 Calabasas, CA 91302 Ferguson Engineering 46-414 Roudel Avenue La Quinta, CA 92253 I. BAQQ3ROiIIID- This case was before commission at its June 6, 1989 meeting at which time it was continued. The applicant was present at the June 20, 1989 study session at which time revised plans were presented which were basically acceptable. The changes shown at that time were that a driveway parallel to Portola has been added between the first building and Portola. The result is an increase in the setback. The first row of buildings will be carports. June 28, 1989 staff received a letter form the Silver Sands Homeowners Association offering support provided four conditions are imposed (copy attached). June 28, 1989 public works submitted a revised condition #22. If commission approves the case this condition should be amended accordingly. II. REOU44RIDATI0N: A. Adoption of the findings contained in the June 6, 1989 staff report. B. Adoption of Planning Camnission Resolution No. approving TT 24632, subject to conditions. STAFF REPORT TT 24632 JMY 5, 1989 III. ATTACHMENTS: A. Draft resolution. B. Copy of June 6, 1989 staff report. C. Plans and exhibits. Prepared by Reviewed and Approved by /tn 2 PLANNING CU4IiSSION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP TO SUBDIVIDE 77.8 GROSS ACRES INTO 169 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS, 2 ADDITIONAL LOTS SET ASIDE FOR 220 FUTURE APARTMENT UNITS AND A LOT FOR THE EXISTING C.V.W.D. WELL SITE, THE WHOLE SITE LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE AND PORTOLA AVENUE, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS APN 622- 020-037 AND 046. CASE NO. TT 24632 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 6th day of June, 1989, hold a duly noticed public hearing which was continued to July 5, 1989, to consider the request of LUNDIN DEVELOPMENT CU,TANY for the above mentioned project; and WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedure for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 80-89, " in that the director of community development has determined that the project will not have a significant impact on the environment and a negative declaration has been prepared; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said planning commission did find the following facts and reasons as justified in the staff report for Tr 24632 dated June 6, 1989, on file in the department of community development, to exist to approve the tentative tract map: (a) That the proposed map is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. (b) That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. (c) That the site is physically suitable for the type of development. (d) That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development. (e) That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. (f) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems. (g) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. WHEREAS, in the review of this tentative tract map the planning connission has considered the effect of the contemplated action on the housing needs of the region for purposes of balancing these needs against the public service needs of the residents of the City of Palm Desert and its environs, with available fiscal and environmental resources. PLANNING OCKJEESSION RESOLUTION NO. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the conTtission in this case. 2. That it does hereby approve the above described Tentative Tract Map No. TT 24632 for the reasons set forth in this resolution and subject to the attached conditions. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 5th day of July, 1989, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RICHARD ERWOOD, Chairman ATTEST: RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary /b-n 2 PLANNIM C r4*4ISSICN RESOLUTION NO. C MITIO S OF APPRWAL CASE ND. Tr 24632 Department of Community Development/P1 1. The development of the property shall conform substantially with exhibits on file with the department of community development/planning, as modified by the following conditions. 2. Construction of a portion of said project shall commence within one year from the date of final approval unless an extension of time is granted; otherwise said approval shall become null, void and of no effect whatsoever. ; 3. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein which are in addition to all municipal ordinances and state and federal statutes now in force, or which hereafter may be in force. 4. Prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contemplated by this approval, the applicant shall first obtain permits and/or clearance from the following agencies: Coachella Valley Water District Palm Desert Architectural Commission City Fire Marshal Public Works Department Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to the department of building and safety at the time of issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. 5. That the setbacks for single family dwellings in this project shall be as required in the R-1 zone for 8,000 square foot minimum lot area as prescribed in section 25.16.050 of the zoning ordinance. 6. That any future development on lots 170 and 171, for a total of up to 220 apartment units, is subject to the city first approving a precise plan of design for same. 7. That the applicant submit and receive approval of the architectural review commission of a landscape and wail plan to be installed with each phase as follows: 3 PLANNING OCK41SSICN RESOLUTION NO. Phase 1: a. Parkway landscaping and wall at east limit of lots 22, 23, 24 and 172 and at the south limit of lots 20, 21, and 22. b. Six (6) foot wall along the north limit of lots 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, and 32. Phase 2: Six (6) foot wall along north limit of lots 1 through 9 inclusive. Phase 3: Six (6) foot wail along the north limit of lots 32, 33, 34, and 35. Phase 4: Six (6) foot wall and parkway landscaping along the east limit of lots 1, 2, and 3; six (6) foot wail along the north limit of lots 3, 4, 5, 6, and 9; a six (6) foot wall and parkway landscaping along east limit of lots 30 and 31; and a six (6) foot wall along the south limit of lots 21, 22, 23, and 24. Phase 5: a. A six (6) foot wall along the south limit of lots 25, 26, and 27 and along the east limit of lots 4, 5, and 6. b. A six (6) foot wall and parkway landscaping along the north limit of lots 7, 8, 9, and 10. Phase 6: Six (6) foot wall and parkway landscaping along Country club Drive and Portola Avenue adjacent to lots 170 and 171. 8. That development on the apartment site (lots 170 and 171) shall be limited to a maximum height of 24 feet for pitched roofs and 22 feet for flat roofs. 4 PIANNIIVG CUIMISSION RESOUNION NO. 9. That there shall be no driveway access in the following locations: a. Along the south limit of lots 20, 21 and 22 and the east limit of lots 22, 23, and 24 in phase 1. b. Along the west limit of lots 8 and 14 in phase 1. C. Along the east limit of lots 17 and 18 in phase 2. d. Along the west limit of lots 32 and the east limit of lot 31 in phase 3. e. Along the east limit of lots 1, 2, 3, 30, and 31 and along the north limit of lots 32 and 33 in phase 4. Department of Public Works: 1. Drainage fees, in accordance with Section 26.49 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code and Palm Desert Ordinance Number 507, shall be paid prior to recordation of final map. 2. Drainage facilities shall be provided, per Ordinance No. 218 and the Northside Area Drainage Master Plan, to the specifications of the director of public works. 3. Storm drain construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study prepared by a registered civil engineer that is reviewed and approved by the department of public works prior to start of construction. 4. Signalization fees, in accordance with City of Palm Desert Resolution Nos. 79-17 and 79-55, shall be paid prior to recordation of final map. 5. Full public improvements, as required by Sections 26.40 and 26.44 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code, shall be installed in accordance with applicable city standards. 6. As required under Palm Desert Municipal Code Section 26.28, and in accordance with Section 26.28, and in accordance with Sections 26.40 and 26.44, complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted to the director of public works for checking approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. Offsite improvement plans to be approved by the public works department and a surety posted to guarantee the installation of required offsite improvements prior to recordation of final map. Such offsite improvements shall include, but not be limited to, curb and gutter, asphalt paving and concrete sidewalk in an appropriate size and configuration and provisions for deceleration lanes at the all project entry points. "As-built" plans shall be submitted to, 5 PLANND G C MMISSICN RFSOLUTICN ND. and approved by, the director of public works prior to acceptance of the improvements by the city. 7. Improvement plans for water and sewer systems shall be approved by the respective service districts with "as-built" plans submitted to the department of public works prior to project final. 8. All public improvements shall be inspected by the department of public works and a standard inspection fee shall be paid prior to issuance of grading permits. 9. Landscaping maintenance on Country Club Drive shall be provided by the homeowners association. 10. Waiver of access to Country Club Drive except at approved locations shall be granted on the final map. 11. In accordance with Palm Desert Municipal Code Section 26.44, complete grading plans and specifications shall be submitted to the director of public works for checking and approval prior to issuance of any permits. 12. In accordance with the Circulation Network of the City of Palm Desert's General Plan, installation of one-half landscaped median island in Country Club Drive shall be provided. A cash payment in lieu of actual installation may be submitted at the option of the director of public works. 13. Traffic safety striping on Country Club Drive and Portola Avenue shall be provided to the specifications of the Director of Public Works. A traffic control plan must be submitted to, and approved by, the director of public works prior to the placement of any pavement markings. 14. Full improvements of interior streets based on residential street standards in accordance with Section 26.40 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code shall be provided. 15. Ccmplete tract map shall be submitted as required by ordinance to the director of public works for checking and approval and be recorded before issuance of any permits. 16. Any and all offsite improvements shall be preceded by the approval of plans and the issuance of valid encroachment permits by the department of public works. 17. A complete preliminary soils investigation, conducted by a registered soils engineer, shall be submitted to and approved by the department of public works prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 6 PLANNIr1G CLMVIISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18. Pad elevations, as shown on the tentative map are subject to review and modification in accordance with Chapter 27 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code. 19. As required under Section 12.16 and Section 26.44 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code, all existing utilities shall be undergrounded per each respective utility districts recommendation. If determined to be unfeasible, applicant shall agree to participate in any future utility undergrounding district. 20. As required by Sections 26.32 and 26.40 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code, and in accordance with the Circulation Network of the City's General Plan, dedication of half-street right-of-way at 55 feet on Country Club Drive and 50 feet on Portola Avenue shall be provided on the final map. 21. Traffic analysis to be prepared for this project to address the specific impacts on existing circulation network (streets and intersections) as well as proposed street/intersection configuration. The report shall include specific mitigation measures and shall be reviewed and approved by the public works department prior to the approval of the final map or issuance of any permits associated with the project. 22. All required offsite improvements for this project shall be installed in conjunction with the first phase of development. In-addition, construction of the interior loop street (Portola Avenue to Country Club Drive) shall coincide with first phase development. 23. The existing traffic signal located at Country Club Drive and Palm Greens Parkway shall be modified to accommodate the proposed four leg intersection. 24. Applicant shall agree to contribute their fair share to the assessed costs for the Cook Street Extension and Bridge Fund. Riverside O?un FireDepartment: 1. The fire department is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all carnnercial buildings per Uniform Fire Code Sec. 10.301C. 2. Provide or show there exists a water system capable of providing a potential fire flow of 2500 gpm and the actual fire flow available from any one hydrant connected to any given water main shall be 1500 gpm for 2 hours duration at 20 psi residual operating pressure, for apartment area. Provide a water system for the residential area that provides 1500 gpm fire flow (must be available from any one hydrant). 7 PLANNIM CCD14MICN RFSOUNION NO. 3. A fire flaw of 1500 gpm for a 2 hour duration at 20 psi residual operating pressure must be available before any combustible material is placed on the job site. 4. The required fire flow shall be available from a Super hydrant(s) (6" x 4" x 2-1/2" x 2-1/2"), located not less than 25' nor more than 150' from any portion of the building(s) as measured along approved vehicular travelways. Hydrants installed below 3000' elevation shall be of the "wet barrel" type. 5. A combination of on-site and off-site Super fire hydrants, (6" x 4" x 2- 1/2" x 2-1/2"), will be required, located not less than 25' or more than 150' from any portion of the building(s) as measured along approved vehicular travelways. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. 6. The required fire flaw may be adjusted at a later point in the permit process to reflect changes in design, construction type, area separations, or built-in fire protection measures. 7. Prior to the application for a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and two copies of the water system plan to the county fire department for review. No building permit shall be issued until the water system plan has been approved by the county fire chief. Upon approval, the original will be returned. One oopy will be sent to the responsible inspecting authority. B. Plans shall conform to fire hydrant types, location and spacing, and the system shall meet the fire flow requirements. Plans shall- be signed by a registered civil engineer and may be signed by the local water company with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Riverside Country Fire Department." 9. Certain designated areas will be required to be maintained as fire lanes. 10. Install portable fire extinguishers per NFPA, Pamphlet #10, but not less than 2A10BC in rating. 11. All buildings shall be accessible by an all-weather roadway extending to within 150' of all portions of the exterior walls of the first story. The roadway shall be not less than 24' of unobstructed width and 13'6" of vertical clearance. Where parallel parking is allowed, the roadway shall be 36' wide with parking on both sides, 32' wide with parking on one side. Dead-end roads in excess of 150' shall be provided with a minimum 45' radius turn-around (55' in industrial developments). 8 a PLANNING CtY441MICN IUMOLVTICN NO. 12. The minimum width of interior driveways for multi-family or apartment complexes shall be: a. 24 feet wide when serving less than 100 units, no parallel parking; carports or garages allowed on one side only. b. 28 feet wide when serving between 100 and 300 units; carports or garaged allowed on both sides, no parallel parking. C. 32 feet wide when serving over 300 units or when parallel parking is allowed on one side. d. 36 feet wide when parallel parking is allowed on both sides. 13. Whenever access into private property is controlled through use of gates, barriers, guard houses or similar means, provision shall be made to facilitate access by emergency vehicles in a manner approved by the fire department. All controlled access devices that are power operated shall have a radio-controlled over-ride system capable of opening the gate when activated by a special transmitter located in emergency vehicles. Devices shall be equipped with backup power facilities to operate in the event of power failure. All controlled access devices that are not power operated shall also be approved by the fire department. Minimum m opening width shall be 12' with a minimum vertical clearance of 13'6". 14. Dead-end streets over 500 feet are not permitted. Provide adequate circulation in those areas. 15. Contact the fire department for a final inspection prior to occupancy. /tm 9 SILVER SANDS RACQUET CLUB HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION P. O. Box 1398 Palm Desert, CA. 92261 , C `' ' \J a June 27 , 1989 M 2 8 1989 City of Palm Desert �uMM!wwr nvauPNtNT DUAKT ENE Department of Planning 01Y P;F PALM DESERT 73 510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA. 92261 RE: Case # TT 24632 - Luko Development Company Dear Sirs : This letter reaffirms the agreement tentatively reached at the Planning Commission Workshop of June 20 , 1989 . Appreciation is expressed to the Planning Commission for conducting this meeting and for the cooperation of the Developer. Hopefully, the modified project will meet the goals and objectives of the City, the Developer and the Community. This property is currently zoned PR-5 (3-5 dwelling units per acre) . All of it! This project would split the property into one parcel of 45 acres on which 169 units are proposed, and a second parcel of 27 . 9 acres on which 220 units would be allowed (7 . 9 units per acre) . Care must be taken at this time that controls and conditions are imposed on the entire land area to assure compliance with present zoning and the Master Plan. The project as originally proposed would split the land (and possibly the ownership) permitting development in a disjointed and non complying manner. In keeping with the Master plan, project approval must be conditioned to assure harmony of the entire land area with the surrounding community. Silver Sands Racquet Club Residents are very concerned about the transition of development from PR-4 on the East side of Portola to PR-5 on the west side not being in harmony with the Master Plan. Development on any part of Portola at 7 . 9 units per acre is very "inharmonious" . The Board of Directors of the Silver Sands Racquet Club Homeowners Association recommends project approval with the modifications and �nnditions agreed to at the Workshop: 1 . Before, or simultaneously with initial construction, install a landscaped strip at least thirty feet wide, with a meandering sidewalk extending from the Fire Station to the North, to the Casablanca development to the South, on the West side of Portola. Maintenance of such strip to be the responsibility of present and future owners of the properties described in Case # TT 24632 . 2 . Concurrent with the landscaping, construct a wall around the perimeter of the property facing both Country Club Drive and Portola, and construct entrances and/or exits in keeping with those renderings submitted to the commission on June 20 , 1989 . 3. Provide for maximum traffic safety on Country Club Drive and Portola. It is our recommendation that right turns in, left turns in, and right turns out be permitted at both entrances on Portola, but that left turns out be prohibited. We also recommend a raised median strip be constructed to facilitate safe turning movements . 4 . To assist in the transition from PR-4 zoning on the East side of Portola to PR-5 on the West side of Portola, no multiple story or multiple family structures would be permitted within three hundred feet of Portola. Mr. James Gleason will represent the Board of Directors and all members of the Silver Sands Racquet Club Homeowners Association in this matter. Again , your consideration of community concerns is appreciated. Sincerely, Harold Barnes, Property Manager on behalf of the Board of Directors Silver Sands Racquet Club Homeowners Association JG: ls cc : Mr. Herb Lundin, Luko Management, Inc. Planning Directors , Mr. Diaz City Planner, Mr. Smith Mr. Richard Erwood, Planning Commission Mr. James Richards, Planning Commission Mr. Robert Downs , Planning Commission Ms . Carol Whitlock, Planning Commission Mr. Sabby Jonathan, Planning Commission Silver Sands Racquet Club H.O.A. Board of Directors FILE: 39COMMIS Page 2 • INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM iU N 2 8 1989 CNhi1JN1PY DEVELOPMENP DEPAKRAtNu Cuf i E'PALM DESERT TO: Department. o,f Community Development/Planning Attention: Steve Smith FROM: Richard J. Folkers, Asst. City Manager/Public Works Director SUBJECT: TENTATIVE TRACT 24632, LUNDIN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY AMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL DATE: June 28, 1989 The following condition of approval for the above-referenced project represents an amended condition for the project and should included in the appropriate resolution. (22) All required off.si.te improvements for this project shall be installed in accordance with the f.-oll.owing schedule: PHASE L: ALL PORTOLA AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS PHASE 2: INTERIOR CONNECTOR STREET-PORTOLA AVENUE TO COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE INCLUDING NECESSARY TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATIONS PHASE 3 : ALL COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDING UNDERGROUNDING OF OVERHEAD UTILITIES ----------- ---- RTCHARD J. FOLKERS, P.E. C ro ftundin Development Co. July 13, 1989 cx " c' IUD j 7 1989 LCAIMUNIlY OEV£tOVM,� CITY i F PgIM DESENT RT qHl ME NT Mr. Ray Diaz Director of Environmental Services City of Palm Desert 73510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 RE: Tenative Tract Map 24632 Dear Mr. Diaz : Enclosed is the Property Section at Line of Site drawing you requested to be included with the conditions of approval from our Planning Commission meeting on July 5, 1989. I wish to thank you, the other members of your staff and city departments, and the members of the commission for the courtesies and cooperation extended to us, including scheduling a work-shop with concerned neighbors to resolve the various issues . Sincerely, f H PbLu din HL: cc cc: Mr. Jim Gleason Silver Sands 9 La Jolla Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 23501 Park Sorrento • Suite 207 • Calabasas, California 91302 • (818) 346-1976 • FAX (818) 346-4829 I 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE(619)346-0611 September 20, 1989 Ms. Lydia R. Shinohara j V/S Associates 42-280 Beacon Hill, Suite D-1 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Dear Ms. Shinchara: Pursuant to your letter of September 19, 1989 proposing street names for Tr24632, please be advised items 1 through 9 are acceptable. Item 10, Raphael Circle, should be replaced in that San Raphael already exists in the city. It is suggested that Renoir Circle be substituted in its place. i I trust this is satisfactory. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Yours truly, StEPHEN R. SMITH ASSOCIATE PLANNER SRS/db I I i I SILVER SANDS RACQUET CLUB HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION P. O. Box 1398 Palm Desert, CA. 92261 June 27 , 1989 iUN d1989 City of Palm Desert COMMUNNY NV LOPM`mr �_Pne mir Department of Planning CITY ;P PALM CES:RT 73 510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert. CA. 92261 RE: Case # TT 24632 - Luko Development Company Dear Sirs : This letter reaffirms the agreement tentatively reached at the Planning Commission Workshop of June 20 , 1989 . Appreciation is expressed to the Planning Commission for conducting this meeting and for the cooperation of the Developer. Hopefully, the modified project will meet the goals and objectives of the City, the Developer and the Community. This property is currently zoned PR-5 (3-5 dwelling units per acre) . All of it! This project would split the property into one parcel of 45 acres on which 169 units are proposed, and a second parcel of 27 . 9 acres on which 220 units would be allowed (7 . 9 units per acre) . Care must be taken at this time that controls and conditions are imposed on the entire land area to assure compliance with present zoning and the Master Plan. The project as originally proposed would split the land (and possibly the ownership) permitting development in a disjointed and non complying manner. I- keeping with the Master plan, project approval must be conditioned to assure harmony of the entire land area with the surrounding community. Silver Sands Racquet Club Residents are very concerned about the transition of development from PR-4 on the East side of Portola to PR-5 on the west side not being in harmony with the Master Plan. Development on any part of Portola at 7 . 9 units per acre is very "inharmonious" . The Board of Directors of the Silver Sands Racquet Club Homeowners Association recommends project approval with the modifications and conditions agreed to at the Workshop: 1 . Before, or simultaneously with initial construction, install a landscaped strip at least thirty feet wide, with a meandering sidewalk extending from the Fire Station to the North, to the Casablanca development to the South, on the West side of Portola. Maintenance of such strip to be the responsibility of present and future owners of the properties described in Case # TT 24632 . 2 . Concurrent with the landscaping, construct a wall around the perimeter of the property facing both Country Club Drive and Portola, and construct entrances and/or exits in keeping with those renderings submitted to the commission on June 20 , 1989 . 3 . Provide for maximum traffic safety on Country Club Drive and Portola. It is our recommendation that right turns in, left turns in, and right turns out be permitted at both entrances on Portola, but that left turns out be prohibited. We also recommend a raised median strip be constructed to facilitate safe turning movements . 4 . To assist in the transition from PR-4 zoning on the East side of Portola to PR-5 on the West side of Portola, no multiple story or multiple family structures would be permitted within three hundred feet of Portola. Mr. James Gleason will represent the Board of Directors and all members of the Silver Sands Racquet Club Homeowners Association in this matter. Again , your consideration of community concerns is appreciated. Sincerely, Harold Barnes , Property Manager on behalf of the Board of Directors Silver Sands Racquet Club Homeowners Association JG: ls cc : Mr. Herb Lundin, Luko Management, Inc. Planning Directors , Mr. Diaz City Planner, Mr. Smith Mr. Richard Erwood, Planning Commission Mr. James Richards, Planning Commission Mr. Robert Downs, Planning Commission Ms . Carol Whitlock, Planning Commission Mr. Sabby Jonathan, Planning Commission Silver Sands Racquet Club H.O.A. Board of Directors FILE: 39COMMIS Page 2 ' - L C HT Oft p0pm o 0 0 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA92260 TELEPHONE(619)346-0611 PLANDIIM COMMSSION =IDG NOTICE OF AMON Date: July 6, 1989 Lundin Development Co. Ferguson Engineering 23501 Park Sorrento, 46-414 Roudel Avenue Suite 207 La Quinta, CA 92253 Calabasas, CA 91302 Re: TT 24632 The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of July 5, 1989. PLANNING COWMICN APPROVED TT 24632 By ADOPTICN OF RESOLUTICIN NO. 1362 SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS AS AMEMED. MITICN CARRIED 5-0. Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Community Development, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. A. DIAZ S PALM DESERT PLANNINGffSSION RAD/tm cc: Coachella Valley Water District Public Works Department Building & Safety Department Fire Marshal PIANN3M CX244 SSICN 103SOLUFI N ND. 1362 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING CCMNISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP TO SUBDIVIDE 77.8 GROSS ACRES INTO 169 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS, 2 ADDITIONAL LOTS SET ASIDE FOR 220 FUTURE APARTMENT UNITS AND A LOT FOR THE EXISTING C.V.W.D. WELL SITE, THE WHOLE SITE LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE AND PORTOLA AVENUE, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS APN 622- 020-037 AND 046. CASE NO. TT 24632 WHEREAS, the Planning Camiission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 6th day of June, 1989, hold a duly noticed public hearing which was continued to July 5, 1989, to consider the request of LUNDIN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY for the above mentioned project; and WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedure for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 80-89, " in that the director of coxm¢uiity development has determined that the project will not have a significant impact on the envirormient and a negative declaration has been prepared; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said planning commission did find the following facts and reasons as justified in the staff report for TT 24632 dated June 6, 1989, on file in the department of community development, to exist to approve the tentative tract map: (a) That the proposed map is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. (b) That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. (c) That the site is physically suitable for the type of development. (d) That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development. (e) That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. (f) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems. (g) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. WHEREAS, in the review of this tentative tract map the planning commission has considered the effect of the contemplated action on the housing needs of the region for purposes of balancing these needs against the public service needs of the residents of the City of Palm Desert and its environs, with available fiscal and environmental resources. __ I 1 PLANNING CLIVMiSSION RESOLUTION NO. 1362 i � J NOW, THEREPORF, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Comission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: I. Mat the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the caimission in this case. 2. That it does hereby approve the above described Tentative Tract Map No. IT 24632 for the reasons set forth in this resolution and subject to the attached conditions. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 5th day of July, 1989, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: DOWNS, JONA'ITTAN, RICHARDS, WHITLOCK, AMID ERWOOD NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: RICHARD ERWOOD, Chairman ATTEST• (� -T- �4 • � RAMON A. DIAZ, Seciet �— /tm 2 v PLANNDIG CCMISSICN RESO,i TICK NO. 1362 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO. TT 24632 Department of Community Development/Plmminq: 1. The development of the property shall conform substantially with exhibits on file with the department of oammunity development/planning, as modified by the following editions. 2. Construction of a portion of said project shall commence within one year from the date of final approval unless an extension of time is granted; otherwise said approval shall become null, void and of no effect whatsoever. 3. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein which are in addition to all municipal ordinances and state and federal statutes now in force, or which hereafter may be in force. 4. Prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contemplated by this approval, the applicant shall first obtain permits and/or clearance from the following agencies: Coachella Valley Water District Palm Desert Architectural Commission City Fire Marshal Public Works Department Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to the department of building and safety at the time .of issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. 5. That the setbacks for single family dwellings in this project shall be as required in the R-1 zone for 8,000 square foot minimum lot area as prescribed in section 25.16.050 of the zoning ordinance. 6. That any future development on lots 170 and 171, for a ,total of up to 220 apartment units, is subject to the city first approving a precise plan of design for same. 7. That the applicant submit and receive approval of the architectural review commission of a landscape and wall plan to be installed with each phase as follows: 3 PIAMDU CCf-MSSIC N RESOLUTICN NO. 1362 Phase 1: a. Parkway landscaping and wall at east limit of lots 22, 23, 24 and 172 and at the south limit of lots 20, 21, and 22. b. Six (6) foot wall along the north limit of lots 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, . 29, 30, 31, and 32. Phase 2: Six (6) foot wall along north limit of lots 1 through 9 inclusive. Phase 3: Six (6) foot wall along the north limit of lots 32, 33, 34, and 35. Phase 4: Six (6) foot wall and parkway landscaping along the east limit of lots 1,' 2, and 3; six (6) foot wall along the north limit of lots 3, 4, 5, 6, and 9; a six (6) foot wall and parkway landscaping along east limit of lots 30 and 31; and a six (6) foot wall along the south limit of lots 21, 22, 23, and 24. Phase 5: a. A six (6) foot wall along the south limit of lots 25, 26, and 27 and along the east limit of lots 4, 5, and 6. b. A six (6) foot wall and parkway landscaping along the north limit of lots 7, 8, 9, and 10. Phase 6: Six (6) foot wall and parkway landscaping along Country Club Drive and Portola Avenue adjacent to lots 170 and 171. 8. That development on the apartment site (lots 170 and 171) shall be limited to a maximum height of 24 feet for pitched roofs and 22 feet for flat roofs. ` 4 ` PLANNIM COMMLSSICN RESOLUTICN ND. 1362 3 9. That there shall be no driveway access in the following locations: a. Along the south limit of lots 20, 21 and 22 and the east limit of lots 22, 23, and 24 in phase 1. b. Along the west limit of lots 8 and 14 in phase 1. C. Along the east limit of lots 17 and 18 in phase 2. d. Along the west limit of lots 32 and the east limit of lot 31 in phase 3. e. Along the east limit of lots 1, 2, 3, 30, and 31 and along the north limit of lots 32 and 33 in phase 4. 10. As part of development of phase I, the streetscape along Portola Avenue including the masonry wall, landscaping, and sidewalk will be completed. 11. The entrance to Lot 170 will be walled off until development of lot .170 is commenced. 12. The design of the wall including height minimum of six feet, maximum of eight feet and appearance shall be similar to the wall design and elevation dated June 20, 1989 and on file with the department of community development, and attached hereto as exhibit A. 13. Turning movements from the two Portola entrances shall be unrestricted except for egress from Lot 170, which will be evaluated based on the results of the traffic study setforth in public corks department condition 2, to be completed and approved by the city prior to construction on Lot 170. 14. Developer will construct a raised median and landscaping on Portola Avenue in keeping with city standards and will agree to join an assessment district formed under the 1972 Lighting and Landscape Maintenance Act. 15. Development of Lot 170 shall be as shown on site plans and elevation dated June 20, 1989 and on file with the department of community development, a reduction of which is attached hereto as exhibit B. 16. All development an Lot 170 shall conform to the Portola "sight line" exhibit on file with the community development department, a reduction of which is hereto attached as exhibit C. 17. No two story development will be allowed without prior approval fran the planning commission. 5 PLANNDG 00M IISSI0N RFSOLUrION NO. 1362 Department of Public Works: 1. Drainage fees, in accordance with Section 26.49 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code and Palm Desert Ordinance Number 507, shall be paid prior to recordation of final map. 2. Drainage facilities shall be provided, per Ordinance No. 218 and the Northside Area Drainage Master Plan, to the specifications of the director of public works. 3. Storm drain construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study prepared by a registered civil engineer that is reviewed and approved by the department of public works prior to start of construction. 4. Signalization fees, in accordance with City of Palm Desert Resolution Nos. 79-17 and 79-55, shall be paid prior to recordation of final map. 5. Full public improvements, as required by Sections 26.40 and 26.44 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code, shall be installed in accordance with applicable city standards. 6. As required under Palm Desert Municipal Code Section 26.28, and in accordance with Section 26.28, and in accordance with Sections 26.40 and 26.44, complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted to the director of public worsts for checking approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. Offsite improvement plans to be approved by the public works department and a surety posted to guarantee the installation of required offsite improvements prior to recordation of final map. Such offsite improvements shall include, but not be limited to, curb and gutter, asphalt paving and concrete sidewalk in an appropriate size and configuration and provisions for deceleration lanes at the all project entry points. "As-built" plans shall be submitted to, and approved by, the director of public works prior to acceptance of the improvements by the city. 7. Improvement plans for water and sewer systems shall be approved by the respective service districts with "as-built" plans submitted to the department of public works prior to project final. B. All public improvements shall be inspected by the department of public works and a standard inspection fee shall be paid prior to issuance of grading permits. 9. Landscaping maintenance on Country Club Drive shall be provided by the homeowners association. 10. Waiver of access to Country Club Drive except at approved locations shall be granted on the final map. 6 i PLANNING Q.MMIISSICN RESOLUTICN NO. 1362 11. In accordance with Palm Desert Municipal Code Section 26.44, complete grading plans and specifications shall be submitted to the director of public works for checking and approval prior to issuance of any permits. 12. In accordance with the Circulation Network of the City of Palm Desert's General Plan, installation of one-half landscaped median island in Country Club Drive shall be provided. A cash payment in lieu of actual installation may be submitted at the option of the director of public works. 13. Traffic safety striping on Country Club Drive and Portola Avenue shall be provided to the specifications of the Director of Public Works. A traffic control plan must be submitted to, and approved by, the director of public works prior to the placement of any pavement markings. 14. Full improvements of interior streets based on residential street standards in accordance with Section 26.40 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code shall be provided. 15. Complete tract map shall be submitted as required by ordinance to the director of public works for checking and approval and be recorded before issuance of any permits. 16. Any and all offsite improvements shall be preceded by the approval of plans and the issuance of valid encroachment permits by the department of public works. 17. A complete preliminary soils investigation, conducted by a registered soils engineer, shall be submitted to and approved by the department of public works prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 18. Pad elevations, as shown on the tentative map are subject to review and modification in accordance with Chapter 27 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code. 19. As required under Section 12.16 and Section 26.44 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code, all existing utilities shall be undergrauided per each respective utility districts recommendation. If determined to be unfeasible, applicant shall agree to participate in any future utility undergrnunding district. 20. As required by Sections 26.32 and 26.40 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code, and in accordance with the Circulation Network of the City's General Plan, dedication of half-street right-of-way at 55 feet on Country Club Drive and 50 feet on Portola Avenue shall be provided on the final map. 7 PLANNING M44 S.SIM MESC LUPICN NO. 1362 21. Traffic analysis to be prepared for this project to address the specific impacts on existing circulation network (streets and intersections) as well as proposed street/intersection configuration. The report shall include specific mitigation measures and shall be reviewed and approved by the public works department prior to the approval of the final map or issuance of any permits associated with the project. 22. All required offsite improvements for this project shall be installed in conjunction with the first phase of development. In addition, construction of the interior loop street (Portola Avenue to Country Club Drive) shall coincide with first phase development. 23. The existing traffic signal located at Country Club Drive and Palm Greens Parkway shall be modified to accommodate the proposed four leg intersection. 24. Applicant shall agree to contribute their fair share to the assessed costs for the Cook Street a tension and Bridge Find. Riverside County Fire Depart ez*: 1. The fire department is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or caztructicn of all commercial buildings per Uniform Fire Code Sec. 10.301C. 2. Provide or show there exists a water system capable of providing a potential fire flaw of 2500 gpm and the actual fire flaw available from any one hydrant connected to any given water main shall be 1500 gpm for 2 hours duration at 20 psi residual operating pressure, for apartment area. Provide a water system for the residential area that provides 1500 gpm fire flaw (must be available from any one hydrant). 3. A fire flaw of 1500 gpm for a 2 hour duration at 20 psi residual operating pressure must be available before any combustible material is placed on the job site. 4. The required fire flow shall be available from a Super hydrant(s) (6" x 4" x 2-1/2" x 2-1/2"), located riot less than 25' nor more than 150' from any portion of the building(s) as measured along approved vehicular travelways. Hydrants installed below 3000' elevation shall be of the "wet barrel" type. 5. A combination of on-site and off-sits Super fire hydrants, (6" x 4" x 2- 1/2" x 2-1/2"), will be required, located not less than 25' or more than 150' from any portion of the building(s) as measured along approved vehicular travelways. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. 8 i PLAMM G CC[-" SIGN IUMAMCN ND. 1362 6. The required fire flaw may be adjusted at a later point in the permit Process to reflect changes in design, construction type, area separations, or built-in fire protection measures. 7. Prior to the application for a gilding permit, the developer shall furnish the original and two copies of the water system plan to the county fire department for review. No building permit shall be issued until the water system plan has been approved by the county fire chief. Upon approval, the original will be returned. One copy will be sent to the responsible inspecting authority. 8. Plans shall conform to fire hydrant types, location and spacing, and the system shall meet the fire flaw requirements. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and may be signed by the local water company with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Riverside Country Fire Department." 9. Certain designated areas will be required to be maintained as fire lanes. 10. Install portable fire extinguishers per NFPA, Pamphlet #10, but not less than 2AlOBC in rating. 11. All buildings shall be accessible by an all-weather roadway extending to within 150' of all portions of the exterior walls of the first story. The roadway shall be not less than 24' of unobstructed width and 13'6" of vertical clearance. Where parallel parking is allowed, the roadway shall be 36' wide with parking on both sides, 32' wide with parking on one side. Dead-end roads in excess of 150' shall be provided with a minvimnn 45' radius turn-around (55' in industrial developments). 12. The minimum width of interior driveways for multi-family or apartment complexes shall be: a. 24 feet wide when serving less than 100 units, no parallel parking; carports or garages allowed on one side only. b. 28 feet wide when serving between 100 and 300 units; carports or garaged allowed on both sides, no parallel parking. C. 32 feet wide when serving over 300 units or when parallel parking is allowed on one side. d. 36 feet wide when parallel parking is allowed on both sides. 13. Whenever access into private property is controlled through use of gates, barriers, guard houses or similar means, provision shall be made to facilitate access by emergency vehicles in a manner approved by the fire 9 PLANNIM COMMISSION RESOLUrICN ND. 1362 department. All controlled access devices that are power operated shall have a radio-oontrolled over-ride system capable of opening the gate when activated by a special transmitter located in emergency vehicles. Devices shall be equipped with backup power facilities to operate in the event of power failure. All controlled access devices that are not power operated shall also be approved by the fire department. Mininwn opening width shall be 12' with a minimum vertical clearance of 1316". 14. Dead-end streets over 500 feet are not permitted. Provide adequate circulation in those areas. 15. Contact the fire department for a final inspection prior to occupancy. /tm 10 MINVPES PALM DESERT PLANNIM O[PMSSION JULy 5, 1989 Moved by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Cannissioner Whitlock, adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 1365, approving PP 89- 16, subject to conditions. Carried 4-0-1 (Commissioner Downs abstained). C. Continued Case No. TT 24632 - UNDIN DEVE,LOPMU 00., Applicant Mr. Diaz stated that the conditions of approval would be as follows: 10. As part of the development of phase 1 the streetscape along Portola Avenue, including the masonry wall, landscaping and sidewalk will be completed. 11. The entrances to Lot 170 will be walled off until development of Lot 170 is convenced. 12. The design of the wall including height, minimum six feet and maximum eight feet and appearance shall be similar to the wall design and elevation dated June 20, 1989 and on file in the department of community development and a reduction attached hereto as Exhibit A. 13. Turning movements from the two Portola entrances shall be unrestricted except for egress from Lot 170 which shall be evaluated based on the results of the traffic study set forth in public works department condition no. 21, to be completed and approved by the city prior to construction of Lot 170. 14. Developer shall construct a raised median and landscaping on Portola in keeping with city standards and will agree to join an assessment district formed under the 1972 Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance Act as amended. 15. Development of Lot 170 shall be shown on the site plans and elevations dated June 20, 1989 and on file with the department of community development, a reduction of which is attached hereto as Exhibit B. 16. All development on Lot 170 shall conform to the Portola sight line, exhibit on file in the department of community development, a reduction of which is attached hereto as Exhibit C. Commission concurred with the conditions as amended. 14 1 14UAIrES PALM DESERT PLANNING M4 aSSION JULY 5, 1989 T I y b 3 Action: Moved by Commissioner Downs, seconded by Commissioner Richards, approving the findings as presented by staff. Carried 5-0. Moved by Commissioner Downs, seconded by Commissioner issioner Richards, adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 1362, approving TT 24632, subject to conditions as amended. Carried 5-0. H. Case No. PP/CUP 89-18 - CABLE AND RYLEE, INC., Applicants Request for approval of a negative declaration of environmental impact and precise plan/conditional use permit for a 60 unit low income senior aparbnent project on 2.7 acres on the north side of Catalina Way, west of the Joslyn Cove Senior Center. Mr. Drell outlined the salient points of the staff report and reccnmended approval. Chairman Erwood o ened the public testimony and asked if the applicant wished to address the commission. MR. WENDELL RYLEE concurred with the staff report. Chairman Erwood asked if anyone present wished to speak in FAVOR or OPPOSITICN to the proposal. MR. FRANZ TIERRE, 46-333 Burroweed, asked if rents would change with construction costs. Mr. Drell informed him that if construction costs increase, the city would audit the information for verification and rents could be increased per median income numbers. Comnissioner Richards stated that he was not aware of figures dealing with construction costs effecting rents. Mr. Drell stated that this was a specific agreement drawn up by Best, Best & Krieger's real estate attorney because of the city's involvement. Action: Moved by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Cannissioner Downs, approving the findings as presented by staff. Carried 5-0. 15 MIINPES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION JULY 5, 1989 MR. WENDELL RYLEE concurred with the staff report and was present to answer any questions. Chairman Erwood asked if anyone present wished to speak in FAVOR or OPPOSITION to the proposed project. MS. MAGGIE LEON, Director of the Joslyn Cove Senior Center, informed commission that there was a need for senior housing and was in favor of this project. Chairman Erwood closed the public testimony and asked for comments by the commission. Commission voiced approval of the project, including the buildings being moved forward six feet. Action: Moved by Commissioner Whitlock, seconded by Commissioner Downs, approving the findings as presented by staff. Carried 5-0. Moved by Commissioner Whitlock, seconded by Comussioner Dawns, adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 1361, recommending approval of CUP 89-3 and the development agreement to city council. Carried 5-0. C. Cmtinued ase No. Tr 24632 - LUNDIN DEVEGoPMENr OD., Applicant Request for approval of a tentative tract map subdividing 77.8 gross acres into 169 single family lots and 2 additional lots set aside for 220 future apartment units at the southwest corner of Portola Avenue and Country Club Drive. Mr. Smith outlined the salient points of the staff report and informed commission that a letter had been received from the Silver Sands Homeowners Association Board of Directors delineating a list of conditions. Staff recommended approval of the project as revised, subject to the added conditions from the July 5 meeting and conditions 1, 2 and 4 of the Silver Sands letter dated June 27. Mr. Gaugush addressed condition 3 and indicated that the director of Public works' opinion was that construction of a median island in Portola was not a necessary improvement to this development, but understood the homeowners association's concerns for Portola traffic safety but the median was not the answer. The northern most entry 3 M PALM DESERT PLANNING Q'I NIISSIC N JULY 5, 1989 point closest to Country Club Drive probably provided the most conflict and controlled access would be implemented there; Mr. Gaugush also indicated that the southerly entry point could be left as full access. Commissioner Richards asked if the apartments were located on Country Club as originally proposed. Staff replied yes, and indicated that ! under the current PR-5 zone two story single family hones could be permitted. Mr. Diaz indicated that if the applicant wishes two story units and they were not identified at this time, they would have to come back for approval. He felt the applicant might wish two story development next to San Tropez. Commissioner Richards expressed concern that apartments should be next to other apartments to allow high density next to high density. he was also concerned that the east side of San Tropez where the cars and parking lot would be would have insufficient setbacks and too much noise to be adjacent to single family homes. Chairman Erwood owned the public testimony and asked the applicant to address the comission. MR. HURB LUNDIN, applicant, stated they had met with representatives from the projects located across the street, including Silver Sands at the study session. In addition, Mr. Gleason and the applicant had filed an agreement that reflected their concerns. Chairmen Erwood asked if anyone present wished to speak in FAVOR of the proposed development. MR. GLEASON, Silver Sands Homeowners Association, thanked the commission for the workshop to allow resolution of concerns. He distributed a handout to modify the conditions of their earlier letter that 1) As part of the development's first phase the . streetscape work plan along Portola, including the wall, landscaping and sidewalk except undergrounding of overhead power lines, will be completed. Developer agrees to join an assessment district, aid in financing future undergrounding of Power lines at Portola and phase 6 entrance will be walled off until phase 6 is developed; 2) The wall design will be similar in height and appearance as design illustrated on elevations dated June 20 and attached hereto; 3) Turning movements from the two Portola entrances will be unrestricted except for egress 4 PALM DESERT PIMUIIG CO ICSSIM JULY 5, 1989 from the phase 6 entrance to be evaluated based on results of a traffic study to be ocxnpleted and approved by the city before construction of phase 6. Developer will provide a raised median strip on Portola frontage to reduce conflict with turning movements and through traffic in keeping with city standards and criteria; 4) Excluding covered parking structures, there will be no phase 6 one story buildings within 128' and no two story buildings within 300' of the west Portola curb; 5) All developments within phase 6 will conform to Portola sight lines, exhibit attached hereto and distributed on June 20. Upon questioning by commission, Mr. Smith stated that he had not seen these new conditions. Commissioner Richards noted that the document between the developer and the homeowners association would have no effect on the decision of the planning commission. Chairman Erwood concurred and stated that the city could not be bound by the agreement between the developer and homeowners. Chairman Erwood asked if anyone present wished to speak in FAVOR or OPPOSITIODI to the proposal. There was no one and Chairman Erwood. Commissioner Whitlock requested information from Mr. Lundin on the two story issue. Mr. Lundin indicated that he had not designated if there would be two story and where that would be located. He felt that if two story was developed in the single family development, it would be in the interior and no more than 20-30% of the project. Commission and staff discussed use and location of possibly two story units, access, setbacks, sidewalk widths and bike lanes. Connission clarified that public works condition no. 6 should have specific language stating exactly what was being required. Commissioner Richards felt that doubling the amount of sidewalk from a requirement of six feet to 12 feet should be discussed and if it was determined to be a good idea, it should be done everywhere, not just with this specific project. Mr. Diaz stated that Mr. Lundin could appeal or litigate the condition if he was opposed, Mr. Lundin addressed the commission on the two story and said he was willing as a condition of approval to limit two story components to 20% and the limit of 900, separation from the southerly boundary (Casablanca). Cormissioner Richards stated that he did not like the location of the apartment and made a motion to eliminate two stor y use in the single 5 �y&3� MIN[lPES PRIM DESERT PLANNIn1G 03WESSICN JULY 5, 1989 family development and he made a motion to dilute the 12' meandering sidewalk/bikepath as a mandatory condition. He stated that if staff could not cane up with specific language at the meeting, the sidewalk condition should be specified as eight feet. He felt that if staff was going to request sidewalk widths of 12 feet, it should be so adopted by planning axmmission and council. He asked the applicant if commission and council were require 12 feet within a year, if he would agree to that. Mr. Lundin replied yes. Commissioner Richards stated that he felt two story single story development was not appropriate because of insufficient buffer of a 19 unit density next to five. Both motions died for lack of a second. Commissioner Jonathan stated that Commissioner Richard's points regarding the two story units were well taken, but felt there was a demand for two story single family developments. He roved to make a substitute motion with the 300' setback from Casablanca and limitation of 20% two story and clarified that standard setbacks within the interior would apply. Commissioner Richards' asked what two story standard setbacks were and Mr. Smith stated that setbacks for 20% two story units would congregate on the west end of the property, and staff suggested addition of condition no. 10 that setbacks on two story units be front yard 20 feet, rear yard 20 feet, side yards a total of 20 feet and minimum of 8 feet, which would allow 16 feet between structures and in most cases 20 feet between buildings. Commissioner Jonathan amended his motion to include the 300 feet between Casablanca, 20% maximum and a minimum of 10 feet between structure and front and rear as indicated by staff. Commissioner Richards noted that the city did not have a setback policy for two story•residential units. He felt the setbacks should not be made on the spur of the moment. Mr. Diaz suggested a postponement on the two story units and when applicant decided if he would develop them, he could cane back and staff would have a list of single story developments that have been allowed two story units. Commissioner Jonathan amended his motion to delete the two story single family residences. Mr. Smith recommended that condition no. 10 be added that no two story development be allowed without prior approval by the planning commission. It was moved by Commissioner Downs, seconded by Commissioner Richards, to approve the findings as determined. Motion carried 5-0. 6 rmv[rrEs PALM DESERT PLANNING, OCM IISSION JULY 5, 1989 It was moved by Commissioner Downs, seconded by Commissioner Richards to adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 1362. Before the vote was taken Mr. Diaz asked the resolution was to include the conditions requested by the haneowners association. Mr. Smith stated that he had no problems with than, but would like the wording "phase 6" to be changed to "lot 7" to avoid future confusion if the phasing were to change. Commissioner Richards stated that they would have to be incorporated as a condition that says developer agrees to the condition on the document that is signed and added to the conditions. Chairman Erwood stated that each item deemed to be appropriate could be incorporated by reference. Commissioner Richards noted that it would be binding to the city on anything referring to public works. He felt the city attorney should review it. Mr. Diaz suggested that the matter be continued to later in the meeting to allow staff to word conditions so they could be added to the resolution. Commission concurred. D. CmUntied Case Nos. PP 89-13 and VAR 89-2 - O. MICHAEL HCXM, Applicant Request for approval of a negative declaration of environmental impact, a precise plan and setback variance for a 2650 square foot single story office building on a 7280 square foot lot on the east side of Monterey Avenue, 400 feet south of Fred Waring Drive. Mr. Smith outlined the salient points of the staff report and recommended approval. Chairman Erwood opened the public testimony and asked if the applicant wished to address the commission. MR. MLICHAEL HU44E, 277 Santa Barbara Circle, stated that he was present to answer any questions. Chairman Erwood asked if anyone present wished to speak in FAVOR or OPPOSITION to the proposal. There was no one and Chairman Erwood closed the public testimony. Commissioner Richards asked staff to review the office professional standards and setbacks for this project; Mr. Smith did so. 7 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 l TELEPHONE(619)346-0611 July 18, 1989 Mr. Dan Ferguson Ferguson Engineering 46-414 Roudel Lane La Quinta, California 92253 Re: Letter oaf July 17, 1989 4"T 24632 Dear Mr. Ferguson: Pursuant to your letter of July''17, 1989 we hereby offer the following clarifications: Planning department condition no. 14 may be bonded for initially, but the median will need to be installed as a part of phase 1. Public works department condition no. 22 should be as per the June 28, 1989 memo. Mr. Gaugush of the public works department advises that the June 28 memo will be operative in place of condition no. 22. I trust this will clarify these matters to your satisfaction. Please do not hesitate to call should you have any questions. Very truly yours, RAMON A. DIA ASSISTANT CITY MAMA �R/DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT RAD/SRS/tni J 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE(619)346-0611 PLANNIM CCM-IISSICN MEETIM NOFICE OF AM ON Date: July 6, 1989 Lundin Development Co. Ferguson Engineering 23501 Park Sorrento, 46-414 Roudel Avenue 11 Suite 207 La Quinta, CA 92253 Calabasas, CA 91302 Re: TT 24632 The Planning Camiission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of July 5, 1989. PLANNING CCrT-IISSICN APPROVED TT 24632 HY ADOPPICN OF RESMMICN ND_ 1362, SUBJECP TO CJBIDITICNS AS AMENDED. MC)TICN CARRIED 5-0. Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Community Development, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. A. DIAZ, S PALM DESERT PLANNING SSION RAD/tm cc: Coachella Valley Water District Public Works Department Building & Safety Department Fire Marshal PLANN12G MISSION BESOLUTION NO. 1362 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING CLMVIISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP TO SUBDIVIDE 77.8 GROSS ACRES INTO 169 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS, 2 ADDITIONAL LOTS SET ASIDE FOR 220 FUTURE APARTMENT UNITS AND A LOT FOR THE EXISTING C.V.W.D. WELL SITE, THE WHOLE SITE LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE AND PORTOLA AVENUE, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS APN 622- 020-037 AND 046. CASE NO. TT 24632 WHEREAS, the Planning Cumdssion of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 6th day of June, 1989, hold a duly noticed public hearing which was continued to July 5, 1989, to consider the request of LUNDIN DEVELOPMENT OMPANY for the above mentioned project; and WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedure for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 80-89, " in that the director of community development has determined that the project will not have a significant impact on the environment and a negative declaration has been prepared; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing . and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said planning caumission did find the following facts and reasons as justified in the staff report for TT 24632 dated June 6, 1989, on file in the department of community development, to exist to approve the tentative tract map: (a) That the proposed map is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. (b) That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. (c) That the site is physically suitable for the type of development. (d) That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development. (e) That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. (f) That the design of the subdivision or the type of rots is not likely to cause serious public health problems. (g) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will riot conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. WHEREAS, in the review of this tentative tract map the planning commission has considered the effect of the contemplated action on the housing needs of the region for purposes of balancing these needs against the public service needs of the residents of the City of Palm Desert and its environs, with available fiscal and environmental resources. PLANNING CCtM1SSICN RESOLUTION NO. 1362 J i NOW, 'THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning CartniSsion of the City of Pa1nn Desert, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the canmission in this case. 2. That it does hereby approve the above described Tentative Tract Map No. IT 24632 for the reasons set forth in this resolution and subject to the attached conditions. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Cannission, held on this 5th day of July, 1989, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: DOWNS, JONAIIIAN, RICHARDS, WHITLOCK, AND ERWOOD NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE' ABSTAIN: NONE �- RICHARD ERWOOD, Chairman ATTEST: MAD ct /tin lt// 2 PLAbWM C34IISSICN RESOLiNION NO. 1362 EDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO. TP 24632 Department of Community Developnent/Plarm3rx3: 1. The development of the property shall conform substantially with exhibits on file with the department of commmity development/planning, as modified by the following ocnditicns. 2. Construction of a portion of said project shall commence within one year from the date of final approval unless an extension of time is granted; otherwise said approval shall become null,' void and of no effect whatsoever. 3. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein which are in addition to all municipal ordinances and state and federal statutes now in force, or which. hereafter may be in force. 4. Prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contemplated by this approval, the applicant shall first obtain permits and/or clearance from the following agencies: Coachella Valley Water District Palm Desert Architectural Commission City Fire Marshal Public Works Department Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to the department of building and safety at the time of issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. 5. That the setbacks for single family dwellings in this project shall be as required in the R-1 wale for 8,000 square foot ' minimum lot area as prescribed in section 25.16.050 of the wring ordinance. 6. That any future development on lots 170 and 171, for a total of up to 220 apartment units, is subject to the city first approving a precise plan of design for same. 7. That the applicant submit and receive approval of the architectural review crnmissicn of a landscape and wall plan to be installed with each phase as follows: 3 1 PLANNING; CCE+nSSICN RESd MICN ND. 1362 Phase 1: a. Parkway landscaping and wall at east limit of lots 22, 23, 24 and 172, and at the south limit of lots 20, 21, and 22. b. Six (6) foot wall along the north limit of lots 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, and 32. Phase 2: Six (6) foot wall along, north limit of lots 1 through 9 inclusive. Phase 3: Six (6) foot wall along the north limit of lots 32, 33, 34, and 35. Phase 4: Six (6) foot wall and parkway landscaping along the east limit of lots 1, 2, and 3; six (6) foot wall along the north limit of lots 3, 4, 5, 6, and 9; a six (6) foot wall and parkway landscaping along east limit of lots 30 and 31; and a six (6) foot wall along the south limit of lots 21, 22, 23, and 24. Phase 5: a. A six (6) foot wall along the south limit of lots 25, 26, and 27 and along the east limit of lots 4, 5, and 6. b. A six (6) foot wall and parkway landscaping along the north limit of lots 7, 8, 9, and 10. Phase 6: Six (6) foot wall and parkway landscaping along Country Club Drive and Portola Avenue adjacent to lots 170 and 171. B. That development on the apartment site (lots 170 and 171) shall be limited to a maximLnn height of 24 feet for pitched roofs and 22 feet for flat roofs. 4 PLANNIM OCbt4 SSICN IUMOL TPICN NO. 1362 9. That there shall be no- driveway access in the following locations: a. Along the south limit of lots 20, 21 and 22 and the east limit of lots 22, 23, and 24 in phase 1. b. Along the west limit of lots 8 and 14 in phase 1. C. Along the east limit of lots 17 and 18 in phase 2. d. Along the west limit of lots 32 and the east limit of lot 31 in phase 3 e. Along the east limit of lots 1, 2, 3, 30, and 31 and along the north limit of lots 32 and 33 in phase 4. 10. As part of development of phase I, the streetscape along Portola Avenue including the masonry wall, landscaping, and sidewalk will be completed. 11. The entrance to Lot 170 will be walled off until development of lot 170 is commenced. 12. The design of the wall including height minimum of six feet, maximum of eight feet and appearance shall be similar to the wall design and elevation dated June 20, 1989 and on file with the department of community development, and attached hereto as exhibit A. 13. Turning movements from the two Portola entrances shall be unrestricted except for egress from Lot 170, which will be evaluated based on the results of the traffic study setforth in public works department condition 2, to be ccmpleted and approved by the city prior to ocnstnnction on Lot 170. 14. Developer will construct a raised median and landscaping on Portola Avenue in keeping with city standards and will agree to join an assessment district formed tender the 1972 Lighting and Landscape Maintenance Act. 15. Development of Lot 170 shall be as shown on site plans and elevation dated June 20, 1989 and on file with the department of community development, a reduction of which is attached hereto as exhibit B. 16. All development on Lot 170 shall conform to the Portola "sight line" exhibit on file with the community development department, a reduction of which is hereto attached as exhibit C. 17. No two story development will be allowed without prior approval from the planning commission. 5 PI.ANNn G CU44L SION FEsa UPION NO. 1362 DeepaartnEnt of Public Works: 1. Drainage fees; in accordance with Section 26.49 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code and Palm Desert Ordinance Number 507, shall be paid prior to recordation of final map. 2. Drainage facilities shall be provided, per Ordinance No. 218 and the Northside Area Drainage Master Plan, to the specifications of the director of public works. 3. Storm drain construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study prepared by a registered civil engineer that is reviewed and approved by the department of public works prior to start of construction. 4. Signalization fees, in accordance with City of Palm Desert Resolution Nos. 79-17 and 79-55, shall be paid prior to recordation of final map. 5. Full public improvements, as required by Sections 26.40 and 26.44 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code, shall be installed in accordance with applicable city standards. 6. As required under Palm Desert Municipal Code Section 26.28, and in accordance with Section 26.28, and in accordance with Sections 26.40 and 26.44, complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted to the director of public works for checking approval before construction of any improvements is cumuenced. Offsite improvement plans to be approved by the public works department and a surety posted to guarantee the installation of required offsite improvements prior to recordation of final map. Such offsite improvements shall include, but not be limited to, curb and gutter, asphalt paving and concrete sidewalk in an appropriate size and configuration and provisions for deceleration lanes at the all project entry points. "As-built" plans shall be submitted to, and approved by, the director of public works prior to acceptance of the improvements by the city. 7. Improvement plans for water and sewer systems shall be approved by the respective service districts with "as-built" plans submitted to the department of public works prior to project final. 8. All public improvements shall be inspected by the department of public works and a standard inspection fee shall be paid prior to issuance of grading permits. 9. Landscaping maintenance on Country Club Drive shall be provided by the homeowners association. 10. Waiver of access to Country Club Drive except at approved locations shall be granted on the final map. 6 PIING CCHMISSICN RESOLUTICN NO. 1362 11. In accordance with Palm Desert Municipal Code Section 26.44, complete grading plans and specifications shall be submitted to the director of public works for checking and approval prior to issuance of any permits. 12. In accordance with the Circulation Network of the City of Palm Desert's General Plan, installation of one-half landscaped median island in Country Club Drive shall be provided. A cash payment in lieu of actual installation may be submitted at the option of the director of public works. 13. Traffic safety striping an Country Club Drive and Portola Avenue shall be provided to the specifications of the Director of Public Works. A traffic control plan must be submitted to, and approved by, the director of public works prior to the placement of any pavement markings. 14. Full improvements of interior streets based on residential street standards in accordance with Section 26.40 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code shall be provided. 15. Complete tract map shall be submitted as required by ordinance to the director of public works for checking and approval and be reoorded before issuance of any permits. 16. Any and all offsite improvements shall be preceded by the approval of plans and the issuance of valid encroachment permits by the department of public works. 17. A complete preliminary soils investigation, conducted by a registered soils engineer, shall be submitted to and approved by the department of public works prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 18. Pad elevations, as shown on the tentative map are subject to review and modification in accordance with Chapter 27 of the Palm Desert Municipal Cade. 19. As required under Section 12.16 and Section 26.44 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code, all existing utilities shall be undengrounded per each respective utility districts recommendation. If determined to be unfeasible, applicant shall agree to participate in any future utility unde�ing district. 20. As required by Sections 26.32 and 26.40 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code, and in accordance with the Circulation Network of the City's General Plan, dedication of half-street right-of-way at 55 feet on Country Club Drive and 50 feet on Portola Avenue shall be provided on the final map. 7 PLANNING 034IISSICN RFSOIdTl'ICN NO. 1362 21. Traffic analysis to be prepared for this project to address the specific impacts on existing circulation network (streets and intersections) as well as proposed street/intersection configuration. The report shall include specific mitigation measures and shall be reviewed and approved by the public works department prior to the approval of the final map or issuance of any permits associated with the project. 22. All required offsite improvements for this project shall be installed in conjunction with the first phase of development. In addition, construction of the interior loop street (Portola Avenue to Country Club Drive) shall coincide with first phase development. 23. The existing traffic signal located at Country Club Drive and Palm Greens Parkway shall be modified to accommodate the proposed four leg intersection. 24. Applicant shall agree to contribute their fair share to the assessed costs for the Cook Street Extension and Bridge Fund. Riverside C=rty Fire Departnent: 1. The fire department is required to set a minim= fire flow for the remodel or construction of all conrercial buildings per Uniform Fire Code Sec. 10.301C. 2. Provide or show there exists a water system capable of providing a potential fire flow of 2500 gpm and the actual fire flaw available from any one hydrant ooxx)cted to any given water main shall be 1500 gpm for 2 hours duration at 20 psi residual operating pressure, for apartment area. Provide a water system for the residential area that provides 1500 gpm fire flow (must be available from any one hydrant). 3. A fire flaw of 1500 gpm for a 2 hour duration at 20 psi residual operating pressure must be available before any cambustible material is placed on the job site. 4. The required fire flow shall be available from a Super hydrant(s) (6" x 4" x 2-1/2" x 2-1/2"), located not less than 25' nor more than 150' from any portion of the building(s) as measured along approved vehicular travelways. Hydrants installed below 3000' elevation shall be of the "wet barrel" type. 5. A combination of on-site and off-site Super fire hydrants, (6" x 4" x 2- 1/2" x 2-1/2"), will be required, located not less than 25' or more than 150' from any portion of the building(s) as measured along approved vehicular travelways. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. 8 l PIAMIW7 O M41SSICN RE5C7MICN NO. 1362 6. The required fire flow may be adjusted at a later point in the permit process to reflect changes in design, construction type, area separations, or built-in fire protection measures. 7. Prior to the application for a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and two copies of the water system plan to the county fire department for review. No building permit shall be issued until the water system plan has been approved by the county fire chief. Upon approval, the original will be returned. One copy will be sent to the responsible inspecting authority. 8. Plans shall conform to fire hydrant types, location and spacing, and the system shall meet the fire flow requirements. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and may be signed by the local water company with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Riverside Country Fire Departmnt." 9. Certain designated areas will be required to be maintained as fire lanes. 10. Install portable fire extinguishers per NFPA, Pamphlet #10, but not less than 2AlOBC in rating. 11. All buildings shall be accessible by an all-weather roadway extending to within 150' of all portions of the exterior walls of the first story. The roadway shall be not less than 24' of unobstructed width and 13'6" of vertical clearance. Where parallel parking is allowed, the roadway shall be 36' wide with parking on both sides, 32' wide with parking on one side. Dead-end roads in excess of 150' shall be provided with a minim,m, 45' radius turn-around (55' in industrial jai rial developments). 12. The minimum width of interior driveways for multi-family or aparbnent complexes shall be: a. 24 feet wide when serving less than 100 units, no parallel parking; carports or garages allowed.on one side only. b. 28 feet wide when serving between 100 and 300 units; carports or garaged allowed on both sides, no parallel parking. C. 32 feet wide when serving over 300 units or when parallel parking is allowed on one side. d. 36 feet wide when parallel parking is allowed on both sides. 13. Whenever access into private property is controlled through use of gates, barriers, guard houses or similar means, provision shall be made to facilitate access by emergency vehicles in a manner approved by the fire 9 1 PLAMD G CON MI0N IWa=ON ND. 1362 department. All controlled access devices that are power operated shall have a radio-controlled over-ride system capable of opening the gate when activated by a special transmitter located in emergency vehicles. Devices shall be equipped with backup power facilities to operate in the event of power failure. All controlled access devices that are not power operated shall also be approved by the fire department. MinimLzn opening width shall be 121 with a minirmm vertical clearance of 13'6". 14. Dead-end streets over 500 feet are not permitted. Provide adequate circulation in those areas. 15. Contact the fire department for a final inspection prior to occupancy. /tm 10 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE(619)346-0611 PLANNING COD14ISSION MEETING NDTICE OF ACTION Date: June 7, 1989 Lundin Development Co. Ferguson Engineering 23501 Park Sorrento, 46-414 Roudei Avenue Suite 207 La Quinta, CA 92253 Calabasas, CA 91302 Re: TT 24632 The Planning Cceraission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of June 6, 1989. Planning Cmudssion continued this matter to qujly 5 1989 and soled a study session on June 20, 1989 at 5:30 p.m. in the administration conference roam Motion caz ed 5-0. Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the -Director of -Community unity Development, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. RAMON A. DIAZ, SECRL"I 1 PALM DESERT PLANNING ISSION RAD/tm cc: Coachella Valley Water District Public Works Department Building & Safety Department Fire Marshal PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING CONNIISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM J DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A TENTATIVE "' SUBDIVIDE 77.8 GROSS ACRES INTO 169 SINGL!. y l`_�IL,Y �r ADDITIONAL LOTS SET ASIDE FOR 220 FUTUREI01da CA f AMID A LOT FOR THE EXISTING C.V.W.D. WELL ! I SITE LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF CM hggY 2 6��1�8° AND PORTOLA AVENUE, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCR] S' 020-037 AND 046. ',COIMMUNITr DEVEI YI r DE? wWrLtO CASE NO. TT 24632 CITY yF ESERTQom y° m WHEREAS, the Planning Camassion of the City of Palm `� �°+ da, did on the 6th day of June, 1989, hold a duly noticed �o a pa ' to consider the request of LUNDIN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY for t.. ��ny� red project: and o ' a' -nN77N r WHEREAS, said application has complied with the require' c B � :ty of Palm Desert Procedure for Implementation of the Califoi �O y al Quality Act, Resolution No. 80-89, " in that the direc�' w o o ty development has determined that the project will not have a D o t on the environment and a negative declaration has been prepare < 1 Nmr WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and 't o A l testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons1 o e heard, said planning cornnission did find the following facts m ; justified in the staff report for TT 24632 dated June 6, 1989� department of community development, to exist to approve the 1 map: (a) That the proposed map is consistent with applicab� specific plans. (b) That the design or improvement of the proposed '- 'vTffio consistent with applicable general and specific plans. (c) That the site is physically suitable for the type of development. (d) That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development. (e) That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. (f) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems. (g) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. WHEREAS, in the review of this tentative tract map the planning commission has considered the effect of the oontertiplated action on the housing needs of the region for purposes of balancing these needs against the public service needs of the residents of the City of Palm Desert and its environs, with available fiscal and environmental resources. PLANNING CC MISSION RESOLUTION NO. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Comnission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the ccnrnissicn in this case. 2. That it does hereby approve the above described Tentative Tract Map No. TT 24632 for the reasons set forth in this resolution and subject to the attached conditions. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Ccmnissicn, held on this 6th day of June, 1989, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RICHARD ERWOOD, Chairman ATTEST: RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary /tm 2 !�r ^Y I � ,grflfff, 3• -i t /A VA !All.I RA INA 6 :. It re f 1 N r ` AN l�r� �f��P' +Q.�k✓`� ,y���fl�i���� � ���yt���jd TI— fy ee— • fi �i I �I i .� rl 1 `S 66� t pJ N I I oli ° u I I{ 1 j - r � S 1 I4 SILVER SANDS RACQUET CLUB HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION P. 0. Box 1398 Palm Desert, CA. 92261 June 27 , 1989 City of Palm Desert Department of Planning 73 510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA. 92261 RE: Case # TT 24632 - Luko Development Company Dear Sirs : This letter reaffirms the agreement tentatively reached at the Planning Commission Workshop of June 20 , 1989 . Appreciation is expressed to the Planning Commission for conducting this meeting and for the cooperation of the Developer . Hopefully, the modified project will meet the goals and objectives of the City, the Developer and the Community. This property is currently zoned PR-5 ( 3-5 dwelling units per acre) . All of it! This project would split the property into one parcel of 45 acres on which 169 units are proposed, and a second parcel of 27 . 9 acres on which 220 units would be allowed (7 . 9 units per acre) . Care must be taken at this time that controls and conditions are imposed on the entire land area to assure compliance with present zoning and the Master Plan. The project as originally proposed would split the land (and possibly the ownership) permitting development in a disjointed and non romplying- ma :ne-r: In keeping with the Master plan, project approval must be conditioned to assure harmony of the entire land area with the surrounding community. Silver Sands Racquet Club Residents are very concerned about the transition of development from PR-4 on the East side of Portola to PR-5 on the west side not being in harmony with the Master Plan. Development on any part of Portola at 7 . 9 units per acre is very "inharmonious" . The Board of Directors of the Silver Sands Racquet Club Homeowners Association recommends project approval with the modifications and ,renditions agreed to at the Workshop: 1 . Before, or simultaneously with initial construction, install a landscaped strip at least thirty feet wide, with a meandering sidewalk extending from the Fire Station to the North, to the Casablanca development to the South, on the West side of Portola. Maintenance of such strip to be the responsibility of present and future owners of the properties described in Case # TT 24632 . 2 . Concurrent with the landscaping, construct a wall around the perimeter of the property facing both Country Club Drive and Portola, and construct entrances and/or exits in keeping with those renderings submitted to the commission on June 20 , 1989 . 3 . Provide for maximum traffic safety on Country Club Drive and Portola. It is our recommendation that right turns in, left turns in, and right turns out be permitted at both entrances on Portola, cbut-thyat:left-turns o_ut-be-proh _b_ ted.-, We also recommend a raised median strip be constructed to facilitate safe turning movements . 4 . To assist in the transition from PR-4 zoning on the East side of Portola to PR-5 on the West side of Portola, cno� Cm-u-1t-ipYs__story-or_multip.le _f-amily-st_ruct-u-r-es-wou-1d_b_e- permitted within three hundred feet of Portola. Mr. James Gleason will represent the Board of Directors and all members of the Silver Sands Racquet Club Homeowners Association in this matter . Again , your consideration of community concerns is appreciated. Sincerely, 9 Harold Barnes , Property Manager on behalf of the Board of Directors Silver Sands Racquet Club Homeowners Association JG: ls cc: Mr. Herb Lundin, Luko Management, Inc . Planning Directors , Mr. Diaz City Planner, Mr. Smith Mr. Richard Erwood, Planning Commission Mr. James Richards , Planning Commission Mr. Robert Downs , Planning Commission Ms . Carol Whitlock, Planning Commission Mr. Sabby Jonathan, Planning Commission Silver Sands Racquet Club H.O.A. Board of Directors FILE: 39COMMIS Page 2 ' fi r ppnrr�,rcIz a' 73.510 FRED WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 PHI 21. 25240991 FWD TIME. EXPU I-'N:l:l_LIF'S M 32175 PUEBLO TRAIL #F3 W CAT crvy CA 922:34 g RETURN TO SENDER m � m oy 620 272 028 Phillips, Betty Jean 73521 S. Desert Green Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 U 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE.PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 '"'3'41 - 2 5 I� mm o H 624 021 057 McLain Western #2 r 1470 Jamboree Road cv Newport Beach, CA 92660 `pt,e� }' oL ''zO FQ ar rd er `•� � E►pired 111111 fill 1111111111111111L1111111111111111i1111[III PM;9N �LIlCJ1+lS USE'' / 6 Ile. /7 [ f a.r is- , Iji. �J ± � IS MAYryv �t" IC3 {� OL�.L`;= 1: 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 71.L VIX E)221/3A1 05/:?'7_/89 RETURN TO SE:i L%LR' m ws NO FUR14ARD:E:N(:; ORDER (IN I :1-LI_ C UNABLE TO F'17Fil.ORD ,p s g n� N a 822 050 028. Pierce, William L. & Xandra X. 5844 112th Plance, NE Kirkland, WA 98033 I� V Bill 11111111 l l 11111111ii111,1II 4 \hJs 9 — — -, PM , ALl`d �YS 11E �a I8 MAY q' ! 1i ett��UE � �:rn oz �s �-rs, ��(aiiD a /389 ti L :V 73-610 FRED WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORN 260 ya �i d Ve\ 'o 62� 180 :"s 39 re, Bu Lillian eo 328 n r,3 0 w 73-510 FRED WAR NG DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 G� �o 624 022 010 y_ Silverman, Jerome & Greta La2Jol as CAt9 O37ninia D NO SI .11 P31pUER . - I t �,`�> ,n.. ��:tL 6•.--,—th1!;��`�(1'-1rrl�rh*.�iirl I:I ALWAYS.AYS. USE - (zflp CODE (KRELl z OO TI TTrn� 5�@IP{� /9$9 ti O 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 Y PETURryEO TO stmean `insuff 622 051 021kiardAddress�Rerused_ / Stikich, Michael No space aapL number__UnclainI & Deborah Marie No sub stea—number_ 41611 Colada Court - AttempW unknown_fivd expired_ No Mau receptacle_ palm Desert, CA 92260 Not deliverable as addressed_ Unable to forward_ Route number and INITIALS31 kj+- Do Not Remail in This Envelope :1 /989 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 z NOT DELIVWAB } 620 283 003 +� M rn 2 Whiteman, Jean R. d�.Joa r A8 ADDR Q— 0 942 Spring Meadow'•Drive , UNABLE TO RWARD N West Covina, CA 40- •-- _ _...._..._... ..........._._- � . r. a U .09 O V { �tiCS,� VS USE GPM N' L� �WS U.SE . . a a '] n (� OD� SIR MAY Q GCZ' EI.+ODLri 7&510 FRED WARING 13 DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 �� bra I VFj i z V Cn _ w� �Y c\j 624 021 023 cv Lescander, Robin Merlo } y� 760 W. Huntington Drive, #5 Arcadia, CA 91006 I I-t-`•� 60 lO L r f C 21 7SIE E_I::SCATDE:f-i X'U VCI: r )AVI;1.049 AIIt : : ' yVt0ARCAfTA IR : 0ERETU ;: [ Fk `' @PMs N ALtYS USE I I JMA ,�, 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 y o: M -0� o w ' J N W a 624 021 056 a � o , PD Racquet Club HOA c10 McLain Development Co., 1470 Jamboree Rd., DeeDee Newport Beach, CA 92660 B•'�t"!Y�ii w'1P FOrwardjpg Order ------------- RE- F0,I8 MAY, /Sag E 73.510 FRED WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 y f a cv w 624 021 053 PD Racquet Club HOA Q Go McLain Development Co., 1470 Jamboree Rd., DeeDee Newport Beach, CA 92660 ETTAtiF 444 f o�ard�nb' Order &Pirea ,6 IR MAY Q' 'N,:Zl�,jL`li`O.�Ly @$4� 0� r>3�n„t,t, ��f:S©�4R ° �989 � ,•� -' E I. 73510 FRED WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 9 E SE µETVRNFG SENDER 4 rn d ATTEI',M-l' WSUFFICIRI AOQRESS RQ SUCH NUMB:R ' ^ 624 021 040 i':.M3 L`7 Ros nberg, Harvey & Geraldine P,EFUSEQ i j Q 7 l az Lane pq Fq FpRl9ARD Patm_ esert CA 92260 - RU - ' V Q�,Ncs, cq I �- PM N ALWAYS USE Ale " :GOD A 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 i� z 620 272 058 Sorenson Ronald C &'doah D. _Jzi 9802 Villa PacificDriV&// Huntington Beadti,'CkWM6 � O -y V JM..R�S:„XA H. MENDELSOHN -` �41JY1�`Y�iL AVENTINE COURT J U N 5 ,R M DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT //�J�/ �� f� / �' 7 CITY DEVELOPMENT PALM DESERT / / 73_ slr, j ' lt/ Pf /� - �ao /, � �a�'�� � ��� �� ����'� � �%�� ���. ������ �� �� �,� oZ L��UCJ ��-( .r. .N ATEq ESTABLISHED IN 1918 AS A PUBLIC AGENCY ��STRICt COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT POST OFFICE BOX 1058•COACHELLA, CALIFORNIA 92236•TELEPHONE(619)398-2651 DIRECTORS OFFICERS TELLISCODEKAS,PRESIDENT THOMAS E.LEVY,GENERAL MANAGER-CHIEF ENGINEER RAYMOND R.RUMMONDS,VICE PRESIDENT BERNARDINE SUTTON,SECRETARY JOHN P.POWELL KEITH H.AINSWORTH,ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER DOROTHY M.NICHOLS REDW INE AND SHERRILL,ATTORNEYS THEODORE J.FISH May 5, 1989 L �L ilh LOA63.1 MAY 1 5 1989 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARfMEN1 CITY IF PALM DESERT Department of Environmental Services City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, California 92260 Gentlemen: Subject: Tentative Tract 24632, Portion of Northeast Quarter, Section 8, Township 5 South, Range 6 East, San Bernardino Meridian This area lies on the sandy area in the northern portion of Palm Desert and is considered safe from stormwater flows except in rare instances. This area is designated Zone C by the Federal Emergency Management Agency. The district will furnish domestic and reclaimed water and sanitation service to this area in accordance with the current regulations of this district. These regulations provide for the payment of certain fees and charges by the subdivider and said fees and charges are subject to change. The district will need additional facilities to provide for the orderly expansion of its domestic water system. These facilities may include wells, reservoirs and booster pumping stations. The developer will be required to provide land on which some of these facilities will be located. These sites shall be shown on the tract map as lots to be deeded to the district for such purpose. Plans for grading, landscaping, and irrigation systems shall be submitted to Coachella Valley Water District for review. This review is for ensuring efficient water management. TRUE CONSERVATION USE WATER WISELY Department of Environmental -2- May 5, 1989 Services If you have any questions please call Bob Meleg, stormwater engineer, extension 264. Yours very truly, Tom Levy General Manager-Chie ngineer RF:bj cc: Don Park Riverside County Department. of Public Health 46-209 Oasis Street Indio, California 92201 CITY OF PALM DESERT INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Steve Smitn FROM: Brent Conley RE: TT24632 DATE: May 4, 1989 The sensity of the project could be assisted by the use of a de- acceleration lane, entering the project. Access into the single family units from Country Club should be restricted with the use of access gates or cards . Traffic for future phases should not be mixed with multi-family units in phases 1 -5 . Fire access directly into the complex should be considered in the future phases. If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to contact me ext. 2 Brent Conley Crime Prevention Officer BC/rh 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE(619)346-0611 May 4, 1989 DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING AND SAFETY PRELIMINARY REVIEW OF PLANS THIS IS NOT A PLAN CHECK! DEVELOPMENT: Lundin Development TT 24632 COMMENTS: No comments at this time, this is for the tract map review only. . OGCS N ER PRINCIPAL PLANS EXAMINER KW:djb P.R.-5 j j P.R.-7, Palm Desert Greens \ - \\\ � _ Oil - i NORTH Fire Station i ' Country Club Dr i7 8 P.C.—(2') j ------ - ----- CouNTF ; er. s`LK pE S. I Subject Property F c.. P P.R_-5 ;$I�ALA\r _ _ Ala.Cruc° 1 1 I II < 'P.R.-22: _ ' MOON fl OPCHIDTq E Cr ROat a \ I 6 WWIW yyy�l -Jikf `✓jade ; �, ( � � 'f7�olln'�'�i�77"1 m I : I lul 1 / Pyi .♦P (ui O ry f' rli - \\ i pl 2\�` !i'' \�♦ ' ii II. _ E STRFE TS) P.R.�5 -- *, Wf-- P.R.-4 ,; p 1 lal 10; 9..1L ! \ IIIV iVl O\ ;1 I \--:ME .;1 - W, in- - lai (GR(VATE STREETS] F a�- `�Y\ I . - H 0 V LEY -- - . LANE 1 '-; i1 5 P.R.— 111 ^r + m, I 11 s l'r n�I 1 / 5ER - - � �` ��VERDE wAY�! Y, I Y !I ' I i 1 Cu$i�� 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 ? I TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 May 10, 1989 CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE CASE NO. TT 24632 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by LUNDIN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY for approval of a tentative tract map for 169 single family lots and 2 additional lots (27.9 acres) for 220 apartment units on the PR-5 zoned property at the southwest corner of Portola Avenue and Country Club Drive, more particularly described as: APN 622-020-037 AND 046 P.R..-5 . I Palm Desert Greens 11 N ORTH- Fire Stationi rcountry Club Dr T O A.H.D. COUNTF Subject Property_ 4 P.R.-r2: a P.R.-5 el L.RP I `�s_ AdTLL IPM,VATE STFs[r5.r5 ,o[ - P.R.-4 le ver[ s•x[[s) [ F LONE =R — e: iL__ J SAID public hearing will be held on Tuesday, June 6, 1989, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber at the Palm Desert Civic Center, 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. If you challenge the proposed actions in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the planning commission (or city council ) at, or prior to, the public hearing. PUBLISH: Desert Post RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary May 19, 1989 Palm Desert Planning Commission , 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO(S)• APPLICANT: —_ Enclosed please find materials describing a project for which the following Is being requested: r9-o-oilYwA .D a nirrs 7-.�• —-- acrcc� far 'o�a2a y�vcjrrae,0= / N-g 7!C ulam... ��.--.— �+ /e v`"riFrNQ rr - Y cte.s cr-j "�ec/ � The attached data was prepared b -`PFl t and Is comments and recommended conditions of approval m The city istin ere t dlndthe rob impacts on the environment (including land a) to You for objects of h' , r w probable historical , ater, m:! or aesthetic significance) and recommendedaconditionsfof approval based on your expertise and area of concern. Your comments and recommended conditions of approval must be received b Prior to 4:30 p.m. /9A9, In order to be discussed by committee. The land division committee the land division Y this office of d services, city building official, city engineer, fire marshal and ai of environmental representative of CVWD) to the will discuss the commission comments and recommended conditions of approval and will forward them office after thereceipt deadline w 1 not be discussed byh the staff report. the land division commny information its e. this committee. Sincerely, l RAMON A. DIAZ DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES RD/lr - - Attachments ry a;.�.. 'y APR-11—'89 14:38 ITY IILEY MCGRH 2O13 • TEL 1,10:415 3-2013 9225 P02 OF IPQ L N B E S E R I7 .- SUBDIVIS104 IAA APPLUCATUCH L ORU : a (spaorbnsne c(f PgannOng a9anaoa©uo a A001=111 ( D"110 Orin}) 23 SO/ f'wAe Jq e eE,Vn1 Jrz 207 CA[ABAtAl GA /3U2 (�/P� 34ro /y7w Mailing Addreu ieleonons City Slate Zip-code REQUEST: (Descries specific notum of aDoruvol nauested). 7e.^Iri97-/VE r,P_AGT /J�PJa /A4 doe jG si��aE GA�,�c� Brio r��G "7j, q.✓y 23¢ MUGT/ `AriiL� eEf/DE�r/AL C/N/Tf PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: ' �oCiT/o J OG TriL NoeTN %Z ac FAcr/o✓ TSS ,eGE JrPP L M A ;SESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 6,SS — D ZO Fr —¢[ EISTING ZONING �� J P100erty OMne( 4uthonsailOn TM undssel aed states that 0 tM pettier(el of fM prepeny dacrlDed Mltein and MreOy giro at. lavtton for t or mis a , x _ 1104 ) ►— ate Agreement a0sol nq t City at Palm Oesert all IlaElll rNativlb ro m' deed' mtrtctlo0s. 1 00 13Y MY SIGNATURE ON THIS A REEMENT Clty " fin Osseo of all IIa0111ft"regarding any deed restrI t th M to the OraWrty dascNDed heteln. e i / Slpnmur pd --' Applicant's Slgnman Signature Date FOR STAFF USE ONLY) Cimmnmental Status Aoaepred aft. ❑ Ministerial Apt E.A. No. C Colegmical Exernodon �j41fU�LS. (�fl® ❑ Negative Decoration ll�CiliA �UJ�CJJ o OmN Retetenes Case No. rrmeewY[MnK YM,ep •te lar•[l I ' CASE NO. Environmental Assessment Form TO THE APPLICANT: Your cooperation in completing this- form and supplying,the information requested will expedite City review of your application pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. The City is required to make an environmental assessment on all projects which it exercises discretionary approval over. Applications submitted will not be considered complete until all information necessary to make the environmental assessment is complete. GEjNERAL INFORMATION: 1 . Name, address , and telephone number of owner, applicant or project sponsor: PPLILAJ(tT : LEUr✓/2eJi N Lur✓p>„/ /�, NA/N DE✓E/�'Mf.✓T 2.35.0/ 'eve 'r4o'fQ2/rp J➢272f 207 C/�LA,B�J/IJ ' CA `J/30Z ICI 2. Name, address and telephone number of person to be contacted con cerning the project (such as architect, engineer, or other repre- sentative) : 6NGiw/E�e .y/JJ,Ii-- fE iifo / QG-�/� /-'Uupf'L LA../� L>/ �i/i.✓TA C,g 9ZZS3 G/9� 3¢2 —LY/SB ! 3. Common name of project (if any) : Tye G�EJcE>✓y 4. Project location (street address or general location) : sdUit/wr�T of //. ,r��,rrcT/o.✓ Car/./jv-� CLug A.2. �- pneTotry ii✓�. 5. Precise legal description of property (lot and tract number, or meets & bounds) :_ le'01C d1 o"� Tr/E Ndp_r// y»Lj o` sLci/o✓ B TSS . X6 i! �3� Irl /y l 1B� As7nc>yE� coP� of 6. Proposed use of the site (project for which the form is filed; describe the total undertaking, not just the current application approval being sought) : 72� fv�o/y Ld TO p✓ /eWArI f�dMfr70 /'�o/iD 2 LuT/ moo¢ /�u�T/ - F.�y,�L>/ �f»t/,� yvzs�a��1 23¢ u/✓�rs, TOJ.HL = Q-03 C�w�u� rG v/✓/rr 7. Relationship t�, a larger project or series of projects (describe how this project relates t0 other activities , Rtj22s , and develop- u ments planned, or now underway) : /VO oiHc'!' /rGiiviriEf PCAN"41 Oi_ v.✓ e w,4y i✓/T 8. List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, to go forward, including those required by the City, Regional , State and Federal agencies (indicate sub- sequent approval agency name, and type of approval required) : G'iry ; y�BuG :✓o.¢BJ g BLv� P<2ro/TJ' SY1TEro�' GoNJ>/LVCi/ON /'r'.2.»iJ EXISTING CONDITIONS : 9. Project site area : $O. 6v AGefr �p fTp6�T CF .re/Lci.iEJ (Size of property in sq. ft. or acreage) 10. Present zoning: f,e (Proposed zoning) : 11 . General Plan land use designation: Lowoi 1r;y e�JrDf ,r/AL 12. Existing use of the project site: V,4e.4N> fX,Eor job �r f��r/� N� cop, 13. Existing use on adjacent properties: (Example - North, Sho South, Single Family Dwellings ; East, Vacant, etc. ). pping Center; NoerN Pnc.o /)EpE¢T G eEENJ MoB/LFNoriB I'.rP_.t% C AcwroJJ cor..�ra✓C:.vB A.&� . wj-: sou:N: C�Ii38G9n/C/! PVT. JiD LOMM(/N lY ANJ> VACANT f+/L r S'AV TRO/sEL YILLAJ i9�f14'T'.M.ENTJ'. l'�'� . 14. Site topography (describe) : vNyucASi,V� T� /,✓ �'�^'F �— / % C-.Q-OfJ `ALL `/lar�/ /✓.W, CoO_, To 15. Are there any natural or manmade drainage channels through or adjacent to the property? NO YES✓v✓p���eau�y 3c% rro PAW /0 A//V S/4,/ 's°- 16. Gradin jam w'�y �ov� g (estimate number of cubic yards of dirt being moved) : 2;5,0 ooa C.v ic;y,? 17. List the number, size and type of trees being removed: 18. Describe any cultural , historic, or scenic aspects of the project site: n/oN fG✓i�icsr✓� 19. Residential Project (if not residential do NOT answer) A. Number and type of dwelling units � (Specify no. of bedrooms) : fG f JG� iilrl. No tiFr aAY rGL .sn. [o if 390..E Ba`D,eoerol 234- Mini-yi+M. ,pwEiG.,.rG v..iiil 4/O '' •, B. Schedule of unit sizes : Nor PeEUJEG/ LErEe�v✓ED C. Number of stories / E— 2 Height MA>C. 30 feet. D. Largest single building (sq. ft. ) 6;000 ± (hgt. ) E. Type of household size expected (population projection for the project) : s�n�ccf. fA•yiz Y : .r 2 65 ZINI;r q�8 oEeso vs MUGT/PGE FAr7/Gy ; 2,37/ UN/T 1 F. Describe the number and type of recreational facilities : / MSIrN ,EEC /JEPN W/¢ TE..rirJ CoueTJ .EEG C'�R PG,dG Coro M Poo[_ �i Z J'Oa'J f�LLj 6 POOL � rPA A26aS Dl1TZi$vTr_'� riizuuGtlauT, G. Is there any night lighting of the project: yE,r H. Range of sales •prices or rents : $ sp� to s � . $ SO, I. Percent of total project devoted to: Building . . . . . . . . . . . . _ 20 % Paving, including streets. . . . . . . . . . . 2 % Landscaping, Open, Recreation Area . . . . . . 56, % { 20. Commercial , Industrial , Institutional or Other Project: A. Type of use(s ) and major function(s) (if offices, specify type & number) : B. Number of square feet in total building area: C. Number of stories Height feet O. Largest single building (Sq. Ft. ) (Hgt. ) E. Number of square feet in outdoor storage area: F. Total number of required parking spaces number provided ' 6: Hours of operation: H. Maximum number of clients, patrons , shoppers , etc. , at one time: I. Maximum number of employees at one time: J. If patron seating is involved, state the number: K. Is there any night lighting of the project: Yes No L. Percent of total project devoted to: Building . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . % e Paving, including streets. . . . . . . . . a /o Landscaping and Open Space (Recreation). . . e • I • 2 Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects : Discuss below all items checked.yes (attach additional sheets as necessary) . YES NO , 21 . Change in existing features of hillsides , or substantial alteration of ground contours. ✓ 22. Change in the dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in the project vicinity. ✓ 23. Subject to or resulting in soil errosion by wind or flooding. 24. Change in ground water quality or quantity, or alteration of existing drainage patterns. ✓ 25. Change in existing noise or vibration level in the vicinity. Subject to roadway or airport noise (has the required acoustical report been submitted?) 26. Involves the use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic substances , flammables or explosives. 27. Involves the use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy, 28. Changes the demand for municipal services (police, fire, sewage, etc. ) ( PW TO LjPPao}c, /000 i.it¢BszJcD �'ayutgT/o./) 29. Changes the demand for utility services , beyond those presently available or planned in the near future. 30. Significantly affects any unique or natural features, including mature trees. 31 . Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or public land or public roads. 32. Results in the dislocation of people. ✓ r t YES �l0 33. Generates controversy based on aesthetics or other features of the project. [ ] Additional explanation of "yes" answers attached. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation; to the best of my ability, and that the facts , statements and information presented are true and correct to the best of my,knowledge and belief. .�fl.✓/EL. `.E.G'GUJDi✓ �,E.✓lr.✓EER>. L!/ND/N /J��/PLOPM<.J� CO. ew..17 Name Print or Type For Signature Date INITIAL STUDY FEE: $30. 00 (Make check payable to the City of Palm Desert and sub— mit with this form. ) y 6 ORDER NO. I The land referred to in this Report is situated in the State of California,County of Riverside j and is described as follows: PARCEL-NO: A: i The West half of the West half of the North half of the Northeast quarter of Section 8, in Township 5 South, Range 6 East, San Bernardino Meridian, In the County of Riverside, State of California, as shown by United States Government Survey. i EXCEPT the Northerly 44.00 feet thereof as granted to the County of Riverside, by Deed recorded April 14, 1958, in Book 2254, page 592, of Official Records. PARG€L-NO:-2: The East half of the North half of the Northeast quarter and the East half of the West j half of the North half of the Northeast quarter of Section 8, Township 5 South, Range 6 East, San Bernardino Base and Meridian, as shown by United States Government Survey. EXCEPTING THEREFROM the Northerly 44 feet thereof as granted to the County of Riverside by Deed recorded April 14, 1958, In Book 22,54, page 592, of Official Records, Riverside County Records. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM that portion as granted to the City of Palm Desert, by Deed recorded March 5, 1986, as Instrument No. 51054 of Official Records, and re- recorded September 24, I986, as Instrument No. 234154,of Official Records. ' ,`• .`ram• ,� iP• t T � 1 a #8 - OWNERS OF LOTS WITHIN 300 FEET PARCEL NUMBER OWNER' S NAME AND ADDRESS 620 180 017 Befeld, Gerhard & Marie (CP) 73450 Country Club Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 Wright, E . L . & Ruth G. 73450 Country Club Drive, #106 Palm Desert, CA 92260 MacDonaugh, Harry & Jeanne 73450 Country Club Drive, #108 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Burns, Grace & Ian 73450 Country Club Drive, #109 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Moore, Buster & Lillian Box 328 Blue Jay, CA 92317 620 271 004 Robinson, Harry E . & Rose (JT) 16812 Sausalito Drive Whittier, CA 90603 620 271 005 Gilbert, Elroy E . & Leila M. (JT) 39900 Black Horse Way Palm Desert, CA 92260 620 272 009 Arazi, Joan (FI) 13277 South Street Cerritos, CA 90701 620 272 016 Atchison, John T. III & Patricia Jane (JT) 5852 Huntley Avenue Garden Grove, CA 92645 620 272 017 Clinton, Michael D . & Jean L. (JT) 65 Sunrise Drive Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 620 272 018 Palm Desert Greens Association (CR) 73750 Country Club Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 620 272 019 Russo, Louis M. & Roceda (JT) 65 Sunrise Drive Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 620 272 020 Jepson, Diane (JT) 1400 Sunkist Avenue, #188 Anaheim, CA 92806 620 272 021 Welk, Louis A. & Irene (JT) 6225 Coldwater Canyon, #212 North Hollywood, CA 91606 620 272 022 Genovese, Peter & Angeline 73581 S . Desert Green Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 620 272 023 Ihnat, Robert J. & Beverlee J. (JT) P . 0. Box 961 La Habra, CA 90631 620 272 024 Ihnat, Robert J. & Beverlee J. (JT) P . 0. Box 961 La Habra, CA 90631 620 272 025 Callahan, John G. & Lucille L . Simon, Richard H. & Kanda L . (JT) P . 0. Box 2545 Apto, CA 95001 620 272 026 Savard, Rene Maurice & Angela (JT) 73541 S . Desert Green Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 620 272 027 Wolfe, Robert Wayne TR & Alpha Roberta TR 1425 Rolling Hills Drive Fullerton, CA 92632 620 272 028 Phillips, Betty Jean (FI) 73521 S . Desert Green Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 620 272 029 McGuffin, G.A. & Enid K. (JT) P . O. Box 88 Radium, Canada, VOA 1 MO 620 272 030 Barker, Arthur E. & Erma E . (JT) 73501 S . Desert Green Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 620 272 031 Guillen, Marin A. & Lucinda (TC) 73500 S . Desert Green Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 620 272 036 Schatz, Albert & Irene C. (JT) 670 Via Santa Ynez Pacific Palisades, CA 1 620 272 037 Fettes, Linda (WS) 66 Rawlinson Place Regina SAS, Canada, S4S 6C9 620 272 038 Turner, George Barr & Ruth Kemp 39901 Blackhorse Way Palm Desert, CA 92260 620 272 051 Caton, Gerald M. & Tina S. (JT) c/o Gerald Caton 2207 Ardemore Drive Fullerton, CA 92633 620 272 058 Sorenson, Ronald C . & Joan D. (JT) 9802 Villa Pacific Drive Huntington Beach, CA 92646 620 272 059 Woody, Leland E . (UM) 14300 E . Mulberry Drive, #122 Whittier, CA 90604 620 272 060 Russo, Tom & Roceda R. (JT) 65 Sunrise Drive Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 620 281 010 Theodora, Helen M. TR 4340 Via Frascati Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90274 620 281 011 Gier, Raymond L. & Dolores Ann (JT) 890 Green Street Placerville, CA 95667 620 282 001 Meathe, Ernest & Jean W. 39905 Chimney Flats Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 620 282 027 Parsons, Bruce V. & Arlene E. (JT) 39904 Desert Angel Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 620 282 028 Berger, Rene A. & Brudence C. (JT) c/o Prudence C. Berger 73770 Desert Greens S . Palm Desert, CA 92260 620 282 046 Holden, Richard C . (JT) Worscheck, Frank A. (JT) c/o Clifford F. Holden 73442 Cabazon Peak Palm Desert, CA 92260 620 283 001 Glaubach, Nathan, TR & Elsie, TR 1746 Ashland Avenue Santa Monica, CA 90405 620 283 002 Eichmann, Arthur W. 73817 S . Desert Greens Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 620 283 003 Whiteman, Jean R. & Joan .R. (JT) 942 Spring Meadow Drive West Covina, CA 91790 620 283 004 Auld, James & Dorothy E . (JT) 2327 Florencita Drive Montrose, CA 91020 620 283 005 Glaubach, Nathan, TR & Elsie, TR 1746 Ashland Avenue Santa Monica, CA 90405 620 283 006 Hammack, John B . 73771 S . Desert Greens Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 620 283 007 Soto, Suzanne Nelson, Kalmer M. TR & Sylvia E . TR 73-759 Desert Greens Drive S . Palm Desert, CA 92260 620 283 008 Sappington, William D. (JT) 1661 Pine La Habra, CA 90631 620 283 009 Leno, Carl Jr . & Emilie L. (JT) 73735 S . Desert Greens Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 620 283 011 Palm Desert Greens Association 73750 Country Club Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 620 283 012 Palm Desert Greens Association c/o Avco Commercial Development 73750 Country Club Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 620 283 013 Palm Desert Greens Association c/o Avco Commercial Development 73750 Country Club Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 620 283 014 Palm Desert Greens Association 73750 Country Club Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 620 283 015 Kurz, Walter & Margaret A. (JT) 73723 S . Desert Greens Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 620 292 019 Johnson, Bernice King 73840 S Desert Greens Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 620 292 020 Pogwist, John F . & Helen M. (JT) 73850 Desert Greens Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 620 292 021 Auburn, Mary E. & Charles L . (JT) 73860 S . Desert Greens Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 620 292 022 Skeans, Edward J. TR & Betty Lou TR 73870 S . Desert Greens Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 620 292 023 Karns, Donald (JT) 2712 Oak Knoll Drive Los Alamitos, CA 90720 620 292 024 Roscoe, Vincent J. & Mary R. (JT) 6036 S . Bruce Street Las Vegas, NV 89119 620 292 025 Gagnon, Linda M. Hutchins, Marian P . 73900 S . Desert Greens Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 620 292 026 Hamilton, Bilue Beatrice & Walter Clarence (JT) 73900 S . Desert Greens Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 620 292 027 Gormsen, Bette S . (WD) 70 Maximo Way Palm Desert, CA 92260 620 292 028 Light, Everett H. & Virginia Reinsch, Harry 0. & Helen M. (JT) 73948 S . Desert Greens Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 620 292 029 Soykin, William & Doris H. (JT) 73968 S . Desert Greens Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 620 293 010 Kovich, Harry & Dorothy (JT) 73942 Munn Circle Palm Desert, CA 92260 620 293 011 Suboter, Louis & Joyce M. (JT) 73962 Munn Circle Palm Desert, CA 92260 620 293 012 Horsey, David L . & Carol D . (JT) 73982 Munn Circle Palm Desert, CA 92260 620 293 013 Glaubach, Nathan, TR & Elsie, TR 1746 Ashland Avenue Santa Monica, CA 90405 620 293 014 Calia, Joseph W. & Lorraine T . (JT) 32112 Via Alicia San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 620 293 015 Korff, Raymond M. & Irene M. (JT) 73943 Munn Circle Palm Desert, CA 92260 620 293 016 Curry, Robert D . (JT) 73923 Munn Circle Palm Desert, CA 92260 620 293 017 Schmidt, Edward L . & Kay F . (JT) 17351 Frans Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92649 620 293 018 Barker, Charles R. & Lola G. (JT) 1178 N. Glendora Avenue Covina, CA 91724 620 293 019 Manville, Katherine C. 7848 Broadmoor Drive Orange, CA 92669 620 293 020 Whitlock, Thomas A. & Sybal J. (JT) 3292 Oak Knoll Los Alamitos, CA 90720 620 293 021 Stradley, Royce A. & Columbina R. (JT) 4140 Fair Avenue, #8 North Hollywood, CA 91602 620 293 022 Sawlsville, Randy L . & Linda D . (JT) 20126 Drasin Drive Canyon Country, CA 91351 620 293 023 Bankoff, Jacqueline (UW) 73901 S . Desert Greens Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 620 293 024 Bankoff, Jacqueline (UW) 73901 S . Desert Greens Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 620 293 025 Grimm, Anthony E. (SM) 73881 S . Desert Greens Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 620 293 026 Russo, Gerald & Mariane (JT) 13585 Valleyheart Drive Sherman Oaks, CA 91423 620 293 027 McCarty, John R. & Helen K. 73861 S . Desert Greens Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 620 293 028 Stillman, Fenwick & Priscilla B. (JT) 73851 S . Desert Greens Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 620 293 029 Dobson, Kenneth S . & Mary Ellen (JT) 73841 S . Desert Greens Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 622 020 015 Alacano, Enes Sam & Kathleen (CP) 2015 Terrace Circle Elko, NV 89801 622 020 016 Alacano, Enes Sam & Kathleen (CP) 2015 Terrace Circle Elko, NV 89801 622 020 017 Alacano, Enes Sam & Kathleen (CP) 2015 Terrace Circle Elko, NV 89801 622 020 048 Western Community Development Ltd. (PT) DBA San Tropez Apartments c/o Monarch Properties, Inc. P . 0. Box 8150 Newport Beach, CA 92658 622 050 001 Mc Cullough, Perry (UM) 41696 Armanac Court Palm Desert, CA 92260 622 050 002 P & H Investments (CR) P . 0. Box 1450 Arlington, VA 22210 622 050 003 McDaniel, Francis B & Florence K 343 Teton Circle Placentia, CA 92670 622 050 004 Smith, Dewayne R. & Elizabeth R. (JT) 41756 Armanac Court Palm Desert, CA 92260 622 050 005 Linder, David 0 . & Barbara M. (JT) 41776 Armanac Court Palm Desert, CA 92260 622 050 006 Warren, Joe T. & Mary E . 41777 Armanac Court Palm Desert, CA 92260 622 050 007 Nethery, Donald Martin & Carolyn Florence (CP) 11601 Wilshire Boulevard, llth Floor Los Angeles, CA 90025 D . Martin Nethery, Inc . c/o Lund & Guttry P . O. Box 2714 Palm Springs, CA 92263 622 050 008 Endicott, Jill & Charles L. (JT) 41737 Armanac Court Palm Desert, CA 92260 622 050 009 Parent, Richard & Shirley (JT) 41717 Armanac Court Palm Desert, CA 92260 622 050 010 Holtom, Herbert T. & Gloria S . (JT) 760 Cavan Lane Glendora, CA 91740 622 050 011 Newman, Jeffrey E . & Sherry M. (JT) 4020 Chester Drive Glenview, IL 60025 622 050 012 Warzin, Fred (UM) 41657 Armanac Court Palm Desert, CA 92260 622 050 013 Davis, Egbert H. & Joan F . (CP) 41637 Armanac Court Palm Desert, CA 92260 622 050 014 Kratt, Valah M. (WD) 41617 Armanac Court Palm Desert, CA 92260 622 050 015 Hayden, Francis A. & Bernadette (JT) 41597 Armanac Court Palm Desert, CA 92260 622 050 016 Popick, Walter & Marilyn (JT) 41577 Armanac Court Palm Desert, CA 92260 622 050 017 Harris, Jean L. (MS) 41557 Armanac Court Palm Desert, CA 92260 622 050 018 Warne, John L . & Marjory (JT) 2917 SW West View Circle Lake Oswego, OR 97034 622 050 019 Sweeney, Robert M. Sr. , TR 602 Lake Superior Lane Boulder City, NV 89005 622 050 020 Gruver, Don A. & Virginia A. (CP) 41516 Armanac Court Palm Desert, CA 92260 622 050 021 Angrisani, Joseph J. & Rose Marie (JT) 41536 Armanac Court Palm Desert, CA 92260 622 050 022 Neiman, Robert M. & Suzette A. (CP) 17503 Rancho Drive Encino, CA 91316 622 050 023 Evans, Harry E . & Claire M. (JT) 51 Parkwood Court Racini, WI 53402 622 050 024 Sarapuk, Jaroslua & Olga (JT) 2263 Sloan Drive Laverne, CA 91750 622 050 025 Alekel, Dennis A. & Judith D. (CP) 1840 Las Canas Lane Fullerton, CA 92633 622 050 026 Block, James F . & Raymond W. (JT) 316 N. Maryland Avenue, #106 Glendale, CA 91206 622 050 027 Farinella, Charles B . & Blanche S . (CP) 41635 Navarre Court Palm Desert, CA 92260 622 050 028 Pierce, William L . & Xandra X. (CP) 5844 112th Plance, NE Kirkland, WA 98033 622 050 029 Leaver, George E . & Mary Joan (JT) 41595 Navarre Court Palm Desert, CA 92260 622 050 030 Strobel, Jack R. & Carlene Y. (JT) 3130 Marna Avenue Long Beach, CA 90808 622 050 031 Kennedy, William James & Angela Mae (JT) 9520 Oakland Road SW Calgary Alb, Canada T2V 4B9 622 050 032 Silverman, Bernard & Caroline 1900 Avenue of The Stars, Suite 2440 Los Angeles, CA 90067 622 050 033 Cicchini, Joseph N. & Suzanne E . (JT) 41515 Navarre Court Palm Desert, CA 92260 622 050 034 Lund, John C . & Donna (FI) 41514 Navarre Court Palm Desert, CA 92260 622 050 035 Bono, Josephine, Ct . TR 230 West Longden Arcadia, CA 91006 622 050 036 Stuckhardt, Kay Blundell (WS) 2364 Lochridge Place Escondido, CA 92026 622 050 037 Bachrach, Sheldon Jay & Cathy Wright (JT) 41594 Navarre Court Palm Desert, CA 92260 622 050 038 Lane, Ivan & Stacey F. (CP) 1085 Carolyn Way Beverly Hills, CA 90210 622 050 039 Stein, Ellen S . TR & Theodore 0. Jr. , TR 7334 Topanga Canyon, #203 Canoga Park, CA 91303 622 050 040 Taylor, Deanna (WD) 73740 Calla Bisque Palm Desert, CA 92260 622 050 041 Beal, Josephine M. (WD) 73750 Calle Bisque Palm Desert, CA 92260 622 050 042 Berg, Shirley M. (JT) 73760 Calle Bisque Palm Desert, CA 92260 622 050 043 Marcus, Penny M. (CP) 467 Denslow Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90049 622 050 044 Moroni, James Lawrence & Dolores Marie (TC) 73780 Calle Bisque Palm Desert, CA 92260 622 050 045 Circo, Nanette M. (SW) 73790 Calle Bisque Palm Desert, CA 92260 622 050 046 Denman, Alice L . (MS) 41704 Navarre Court Palm Desert, CA 92260 622 050 047 Langner, Roger L. & Claudia J. (JT) 41714 Navarre Court Palm Desert, CA 92260 622 050 048 Griffith, Ronald W. & Lindsey (JT) 41724 Navarre Court Palm Desert, CA 92260 622 050 049 Frank, Rodman A. (UM) P . 0. Box 3547 Palm Desert, CA 92260 622 050 050 Asp, David E . (SM) P . 0. Box 3124 Palm Desert, CA 92260 622 050 051 Ofee, Ross J. & Beverly J. (JT) 41754 Navarre Court Palm Desert, CA 92260 622 050 052 Coughlin, W. Ronald & Julia I . (JT) 41764 Navarre Court Palm Desert, CA 92260 622 050, 053 Lumsden, Richard A. & Doris M. (CP) 2540 Wilt Road Fallbrook CA 92028 622 050 054 Kerns, Jack C. & Victoria L . (CP) 41775 Navarre Court Palm Desert, CA 92260 622 050 055 Concordia Federal Bank for Savings (CR) 2320 Thornton Road Lansing, IL 60438 622 050 056 Stevens, Harriet A. (JT) 41755 Navarre Court Palm Desert, CA 92260 622 050 057 Hannah, Maryjo (UW) 41745 Navarre Court Palm Desert, CA 92260 622 050 058 Rubin, Leonoard M. & Karin A. (JT) 41735 Navarre Court Palm Desert, CA 92260 622 050 059 Lindquist, Barbara (UW) 41725 Navarre Court Palm Desert, CA 92260 622 050 060 Holm, Richard P . & Arlene J. (JT) 41715 Navarre Court Palm Desert, CA 92260 622 050 061 Glantz, Shirley (WD) 41705 Navarre Court Palm Desert, CA 92260 622 050 062 Murata, Kris, TR 11825 NE 75th Kirkland, WA 98033 622 050 063 Wold, Albert & Beverly M. (JT) 41685 Navarre Court Palm Desert, CA 92260 622 050 064 Williams, Fred M. & Betty L . (FI) Kessler, Carl (FI) 22837 Ventura Boulevard, #201 Woodland Hills, CA 91364 622 050 065 Deroche, William T . & Irma Louise (JT) 41665 Navarre Court Palm Desert, CA 92260 622 050 066 Baca, Raymond & Dorothy (JT) 425 W. Avenue 42 Los Angeles, CA 90045 622 050 067 Proctor, Dorothea M. (SW) 41645 Navarre Court Palm Desert, CA 92260 622 050 068 Casa Blanca Owners Association c/o Kanne Stephen Land Co . 11500 West Olympic Place 4 Los Angeles, CA 90064 622 051 001 Moroni, James L. & Dolores M. (JT) 73800 Calle Bisque Palm Desert, CA 92260 622 051 002 Eblowitz, Bernard, TR & Rhoda, TR 20 Lafayette Drive Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 622 051 003 Fiedler, James N. & Laurel W. 119 Via Koran Newport Beach, CA 92663 622 051 004 Brumer, Max & Ronnie Ellen (TC) 7 Burmington Drive Manalapan, NJ 07726 622 051 005 Miller, Robert G. (SM) c/o K & B 6379 Clark Avenue Dublin, CA 94566 622 051 006 Baldwin, Clarence G. (MS) Box 32 Mayne Island, Canada, VON2J0 622 051 007 Karsh, Nathan P . 0. Box 82656 San Diego, CA 92138 622 051 008 Barnes, Daniel J. (SM) 41613 Aventine Court Palm Desert, CA 92260 622 051 009 Ortega, John II & Vonna Wilkins (JT) 41593 Aventine Court Palm Desert, CA 92260 622 051 010 Komonyi, Geza (SM) P . 0. Box 1992 Palm Springs, CA 92263 622 051 011 Meltzner, Paul J. TR & Ruthe H. TR 2513 Angelcrest Drive Hacienda Heights, CA 91745 622 051 012 Nordblom, Lorraine E . (WS) 5243 Co Road 151 Mound, MN 55364 622 051 013 Cherniak, Leon & Charlotte M. (JT) 5707 Natick Avenue Van Nuys, CA 91411 622 051 014 Halper, Lewis & Fay (JT) 27938 Ridgebrook Court Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90274 622 051 015 Albertson, William & Linda (FI) 13050 Destino Lane Cerritos, CA 90701 622 051 016 Jarriel, Mathilde Kapuano & Keith G. (TC) 4758G La Villa Marina Marina Del Rey, CA 90292 622 051 017 Kapuano, Mathilde (TC) 13245D Fiji Way Marina Del Rey, CA 90202 622 051 018 Flamme, Douglas E . & Ona Mae (JT) 705 3240 66th Avenue SW Calgary Alb, Canada TH 6M5 622 051 019 Dinkel, Beatrice Joyce (FI) c/o Robert Stanley Dinkel 2233 13th Street, SW Calgary Alb, Canada T2T3P8 622 051 020 Fisher, Matt (JT) 41631 Colada Court Palm Desert, CA 92260 622 051 021 Stikich, Michael & Deborah Marie (JT) 41611 Colada Court Palm Desert, CA 92260 622 051 022 Winchel, Leo H. & Beverly M. (JT) 1817 Avenida San Lorenzo Fullerton, CA 92633 622 051 023 Ankeny, David L . & Geraldine Jean (JT) 10058 Lesterford Avenue Downey, CA 90240 622 051 024 Gerhardt, Jack H. & Juleen L. (JT) 41551 Colada Court Palm Desert, CA 92260 I 622 051 025 Gallo, J. Peter (UM) 41531 Colada Court Palm Desert, CA 92260 622 051 026 Fishbein, Stuart Bernard & Janice Merle (JT) 18755 Hatteras Street, #15 Tarzana, CA 91356 622 051 027 Singer, Frank, TR & Therese Renee, TR 23520 Berdon Woodland Hills, CA 91367 622 051 028 Traunweiser, John Adams & Frances Geraldine (JT) 141 2345 Cedar Hill Victoria BC Canada V8P 5M8 622 051 029 Kurtz, Swoosie (SW) 4404 Placidia Avenue Toluca Lake, CA 91602 622 051 030 Lucas, Jeanette J. (UW) 41570 Colada Court Palm Desert, CA 92260 622 051 031 Carlson Family Partnership (PT) 4955 NE 85th Street Seattle, WA 98115 622 051 032 Mohr, Alvin L. & Lila L. (JT) P . 0 Box 10 Fargo, ND 58103 622 051 033 Woodcrest Development of Orange County, Inc. (CR) 17911 Mitchell Avenue Irvine, CA 92714 622 051 034 McNee, Douglas Miles & Margueritha Rebecca (JT) 41650 Colada Court Palm Desert, CA 92260 622 051 035 Friederang, Fred W. & Theresa M. (JT) 41670 Colada Court Palm Desert, CA 92260 622 051 036 Singer, Aaron & Loretta M. (JT) 2602 E1 Capitan Arcadia, CA 91006 622 051 037 James A. Love Holdings Ltd. c/o James Love 403 318 26th Av SW Calgary Alb, Canada T2S2T9 622 051 038 Kurtz, Frank & Margo (JT) 4404 Placidia Avenue Toluca Lake, CA 91602 622 051 039 Barker, Norman S . & Elizabeth M. (JT) 41750 Colada Court Palm Desert, CA 92260 622 051 040 Onley, Albert W. & Eleanor E . (JT) 41770 Colada Court Palm Desert, CA 92260 622 051 041 Bright, Joyce Mary (SW) 41771 Colada Court Palm Desert, CA 92260 622 051 042 Smith, Marion Burrows, TR 1425 Tomahawk Drive Salt Lake City, UT 84103 622 051 043 Wallace, John W. (SM) 41731 Colada Court Palm Desert, CA 92260 622 051 044 Marlowe, Joy (SW) P . 0. Box 596 Palm Desert, CA 92260 622 051 045 Farrell, Dennis M. (UM) 41691 Colada Court Palm Desert, CA 92260 622 051 046 Gumhold, Walter H. & Verla P . (JT) P . O. Box 888 Woodruff, W 54568 622 051 047 Meyer, Daniel T. & Marilyn J. (JT) 8872 Ann Cross Drive Garden Grove, CA 92641 622 051 048 Vanvlack Dorothy 41662 Aventine Court Palm Desert, CA 92260 622 051 049 Schweit, George A. & Catherine A. (JT) 41672 Aventine Court Palm Desert, CA 92260 622 051 050 Dorner, Francis J. & Barbara A. (CP 20511 Wayne Avenue Torrance, CA 90503 f 622 051 051 Plinneke, Mark A. (SM) 294 Waverly St, #4 Menlo Park, CA 94025 622 051 052 McArthur, Margaret R. (UW) 41702 Aventine Court Palm Desert, CA 92260 622 051 053 Nathan, Richard J. & Debra A. (JT) 33536 Valle Road San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 622 051 054 Troy Mintz, Rosemarie (JT) 10627 Ashton Av, #305 Los Angeles, CA 90024 622 051 055 Babcock, Bernard H. II (MS) 1280 Virginia Road San Marino, CA 91108 622 051 056 Sanderman, Maurice & Myra L . (JT) c/o Micky Sanderman 880 Great Elm Lane Highland Park, IL 60035 622 051 057 Mendelsohn, Bernard & Irma H. (JT) 41752 Aventine Court Palm Desert, CA 92260 622 051 058 Mercer, Herbert Martin (MS) 41762 Aventine Court Palm Desert, CA 92260 622 051 059 Molle, Marjorie J. 9405 E . Doubletree Ranch 238 Scottsdale, AZ 85258 622 051 060 Davis, Daphnie Evelyn (WS) 6725 Lachine Court Calgary Alb Canada T3E 6E7 622 051 061 Mills, Helen Irene (WD) 41763 Aventine Court Palm Desert, CA 92260 622 051 062 Lundberg, George L . & Carolyn S . K. (JT) 2047 Port Whitby Newport Beach, CA 92660 622 051 063 Moe, Gilbert A. 41743 Aventine Court Palm Desert, CA 92260 622 051 064 Lee, Laura B. , Ben P . 0. Box 4382 Terminal Annex Los Angeles, CA 90051 622 051 065 Kraft, Christel (SW) 41723 Aventine Court Palm Desert, CA 92260 622 051 066 Lambert, Charles Eric & Danuta Marie (HW) 41713 Aventine Court Palm Desert, CA 92260 622 051 067 Sarto, Herman, TR & Ann TR 1119 S . Oakhurst, #1 Los Angeles, CA 90035 622 051 068 Casa Blanca Owners Association (CR) c/o Kanne Stephen LA Co. 11500 W. Olympic Place, #4 Los Angeles, CA 90064 624 021 020 Mooney, Robert E . & Paula (TC) 1 Acapulco Palm Desert, CA 92260 624 021 021 Rueb, Gunter K. TR 23242 Mindanao Circle Laguna Niguel, CA 92677 624 021 022 Pawlowski, Stanley J. & Theresa E . (JT) 1433 Janeen Way Anaheim, CA 92801 624 021 023 Lescander, Robin Merlo (JT) 760 W. Huntington Drive, #5 Arcadia, CA 91006 624 021 024 Johnson, Robert L . & Jeannette I . (JT) 9 Acapulco Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 624 021 025 Morgan, Rosa W. & Lisa M. (JT) 4537 Drexel Boulevard Chicago, IL 60653 624 021 026 Williams, Robert T . (SE) 13 Acapulco Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 624 021 027 Tuttle, Keith N. & Mary R. (JT) P . 0. Box 3329 Rancho Santa Fe, CA 92067 624 021 028 Thompson, Robert B . (UM) 534 21st Place Santa Monica, CA 90402 624 021 029 Neish, David B. & Anne C . (JT) 31641 Via Quixote San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 624 021 030 Thornton, Robert B . & Frieda V. (JT) 2708 Patti Lane Rogers, AR 72756 624 021 031 Shaw, David Barry & Eileen Margaret (JT) 24 Acapulco Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 624 021 032 Reaume, Bradley G. & Lorraine D . (JT) 810 S . Michigan Boulevard Pasadena, CA 91107 624 021 033 Markowitz, Harold Jules, TR & Gloria P . TR 2159 Rancho Culebra Covina, CA 91724 624 021 034 Reed, Tommy L . TR & Rose Marie, TR 2455 Camino del Sol Fullerton, CA 92633 624 021 035 Guy, Shirley L. (JT) 4 La Paz Lane Palm Desert, CA 92260 624 021 036 Wahs, Joan Patricia (WS) 2 La Paz Lane Palm Desert, CA 92260 624 021 037 Elsee, John B. & Nina H. (JT) Route 4, Box 5025 Rathdrum, ID 83858 624 021 038 Kurnick, Jordan & Geraldine (JT) 20835 Nordhoff Street Chatsworth, CA 91311 624 021 039 Lynch, Don & Marilyn (CP) 3900 The Strand Manhattan Beach, CA 90266 624 021 040 Rosenberg, Harvey & Geraldine S . (TC) 7 La Paz Lane Palm Desert, CA 92260 624 021 041 Hadeler, Robert W. Jr. & Sarah Rolfe (JT) 3275 Hutton Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90210 624 021 042 Shea, John Martin & Marion A. (JT) 260 Newport Center Drive Newport Beach, CA 92660 624 021 043 Wlaberg, Philip 0. & Pamela B. (JT) 13 La Paz Lane Palm Desert, CA 92260 624 021 044 Evans, Erin (FI) 1901 La Mesa Drive Santa Monica, CA 90402 624 021 045 Burns, Stephanie (SW) P . 0. Box 667 Corona del Mark, CA 92625 624 021 046 Thomas, Ward J. & Lois J. (JT) 30870 Kirk Lane Franklin, MI 48025 624 021 047 Western Federal Savings & Loan Association c/o Jennifer Trinidad P . 0. Box 9959 Marina del Rey, CA 90295 624 021 048 Duque, Henry M. (MS) 26074 Mulberry Lane Los Altos Hills, CA 94022 624 021 049 Fleschner, Emil P . & Peggene A. (JT) 3275 Hutton Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90201 624 021 050 Ward, Clayburn, J. & Carolyn A. (JT) 2038 N. Redding Way Upland, CA 91786 624 021 051 Palm Desert Racquet Club Homeowners Association (CR) c/o McLain Development Co . , Attention: Dee Dee 1470 Jamboree Road Newport Beach, CA 92660 624 021 052 Palm Desert Racquet Club Homeowners Association (CR) c/o McLain Development Co . , Attention : Dee Dee 1470 Jamboree Road Newport Beach, CA 92660 624 021 053 Palm Desert Racquet Club Homeowners Association (CR) c/o McLain Development Co. , Attention : Dee Dee 1470 Jamboree Road Newport Beach, CA 92660 624 021 056 Palm Desert Racquet Club Homeowners Association (CR) c/o McLain Development Co. , Attention : Dee Dee 1470 Jamboree Road Newport Beach, CA 92660 624 021 057 McLain Western #2 (PT) 1470 Jamboree Road Newport Beach, CA 92660 624 022 001 Stein, Sherley (JT) 1 Verde Way Palm Desert, CA 92260 624 022 002 Hochman, Lee A. (SM) 3 Verde Way Palm Desert, CA 92260 624 022 003 Simpson, Robert J. & Florence T . (CP) 14 Sunlight Irvine, CA 92715 624 022 004 Dehoop, Robert & Haydee (C) 6761 Skyview Drive Huntington Beach, CA 92647 624 022 005 Ames, Martin (WR) 9 Verde Way Palm Desert, CA 92260 624 022 006 Lee, Jean (WD) 4030 Mariner Avenue Westlake Village, CA 91361 624 022 007 Wilkinson, Don F & Katharine Marie (CP) 10891 Furling Drive Santa Ana, CA 92705 624 022 008 Myers, Helen A. (FI) 580 Paseo de Luna Anaheim, CA 92807 624 022 009 Saurenman, Mary Louise (UW) 1907 Mairemont Walnut, CA 91789 624 022 010 Silverman, Jerome & Greta (FI) 5524 Caminito Herminia La Jolla, CA 92037 r n 624 022 011 Howell, Cecil L . & Doreen (JT) 21 Verde Way Palm Desert, CA 92260 624 022 012 Belden, Josiah G. & Signe M. (CP) 23 Verde Way Palm Desert, CA 92260 624 022 013 Carpentier, Patricia R. (SW) 10762 Wilson Alta Loma, CA 91701 624 022 014 Hall, William P . (WR) 4811 Roma Court Marina del Rey, CA 90292 624 022 015 McGinnes, Matthew R. (SE) 661 1/2 W. Glenoaks Glendale, CA 91205 i • i L 620 180 017 620 272 017 1 620 272 026 Befeld, Gerhard & Marie Clinton, Michael D. & Jean L. Savard, Rene Maurice & Angela P3450 Country Club Drive 65 Sunrise Drive 73541 S. Desert Green Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 Palm Desert, CA 92260 1 620 180 017 620 272 018 i 620 272 027 Wright, E. L. & Ruth G. Palm Desert Greens Assoc. Wolfe Robert Wayne 73450 Country Club Dr., #106 73750 Country Club Drive & Alpha Roberta Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Desert, CA 92260 1425 Rolling Hills Drive i Fullerton, CA 92632 620 180 017 620 272 019 620 272 028 MacDonaugh, Harry & Jeanne Russo, Louis M. & Roceda Phillips, Betty Jean 73450 Country Club Dr., #108 65 Sunrise Drive 73521 S. Desert Green Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 Palm Desert, CA 92260 620 180 017 620 272 020 620 272 029 Bums, Grace & Ian Jepson, Diane McGuffin, G.A. & Enid K. 73450 Country Club Dr., #109 1400 Sunkist Avenue, #188 P. O. Box 88 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Anaheim, CA 92806 Radium, Canada, VOA 1 MO 1 620 180 017 I 620 272 021 620 272 030 Moore, Buster & Lillian Welk, Louis A. & Irene Barker, Arthur E. & Erma E. Box 328 6225 Coldwater Canyon, #212' 73501 S. Desert Green Drive Blue Jay, CA 92317 North Hollywood, CA 91606 Palm Desert, CA 92260 t 620 271 004 620 272 022 620 272 031 Robinson, Harry E. & Rose I Genovese, Peter & Angeline Guillen, Marin A. & Lucinda 16812 Sausalito Drive 73581 S. Desert Green Drive 73500 S. Desert Green Drive Whittier, CA 90603 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Desert, CA 92260 t 620 271 005 620 272 023 620 272 036 Gilbert, Elroy E. & Leila M. Ihnat, Robert J. & Bevedee J. Schatz, Albert & Irene C. 39900 Black Horse Way P. O. Box 961 670 Via Santa Ynez Palm Desert, CA 92260 La Habra, CA 90631 Pacific Palisades, CA 620 272 009 620 272 024 620 272 037 Arazi, Joan I Ihnat, Robert J. & Beverlee J. Fettes, Linda 13277 South Street P. O. Box 961 66 Rawlinson Place Cerritos, CA 90701 La Habra, CA 90631 Regina SAS, Canada, S4S 609 620 272 016 i 620 272 038 Atchison, John & Patricia Jane 620 272 025 5852 HuntleyAvenue Callahan, John G. & Lucille L. Turner, George Barr Simon, Richard H. & Kanda L. & Ruth Kemp Garden Grove, CA 92645 P. O, Box 2545 39901 Blackhorse Way T Apto, CA 95001 Palm Desert, CA 92260 t¢ye�aa.re i � I �I 620 272 051 620 282 046 620 283 009 Caton, Gerald M. & Tina S. Holden, Richard C. Leno, Carl Jr. & Emilie L. c/o Gerald Caton Worscheck, Frank A. 73735 S. Desert Greens Drive 2207 Ardemore Drive Go Clifford F. Holden Palm Desert, CA 92260 Fullerton, CA 92633 73442 Cabazon Peak Palm Desert, CA 92260 620 272 058 620 283 001 620 283 011 Sorenson, Ronald C. & Joan D. Glaubach, Nathan, & Elsie, Palm Desert Greens Assoc. 9802 Villa Pacific Drive 1746 Ashland Avenue 73750 Country Club Drive Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Santa Monica, CA 90405 Palm Desert, CA 92260 620 272 059 620 283 002 620 283 012 Woody, Leland E. Eichmann, Arthur W. Palm Desert Greens Assoc. 14300 E. Mulberry Drive, #122 73817 S. Desert Greens Drive Go Avco Comm'I. Dev. Whittier, CA 90604 Palm Desert, CA 92260 73750 Country Club Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 620 272 060 620 283 003 620 283 013 Russo, Tom & Roceda R. Whiteman, Jean R. & Joan R. Palm Desert Greens Assoc. 65 Sunrise Drive 942 Spring Meadow Drive Go Avco Comm'l. Dev. Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 West Covina, CA 91790 73750 Country Club Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 620 281 010 620 283 004 620 283 014 Theodora, Helen M. Auld, James & Dorothy E. Palm Desert Greens Assoc. 4340 Via Frascati 2327 Florencita Drive 73750 Country Club Drive Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90274 Montrose, CA 91020 Palm Desert, CA 92260 620 281 011 620 283 005 620 283 015 Gier, Raymond L. & Dolores Ann Glaubach, Nathan, & Elsie, Kurz, Walter & Margaret A. 890 Green Street 1746 Ashland Avenue 73723 S. Desert Greens Drive Placerville, CA 95667 Santa Monica, CA 90405 Palm Desert, CA 92260 620 282 001 620 283 006 620 292 019 Meathe, Ernest & Jean W. Hammack, John B. Johnson, Bernice King 39905 Chimney Flats Drive 73771 S. Desert Greens Drive 73840 S Desert Greens Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Desert, CA 92260 620 282 027 620 283 007 620 292 020 Parsons, Bruce V. & Arlene E. Soto, Suzanne Pogwist, John F. & Helen M. 39904 Desert Angel Drive Nelson, Kalmer M. & Sylvia E. 73850 Desert Greens Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 73-759 Desert Greens Drive S. Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Desert, CA 92260 620 282 028 620 283 008 620 292 021 Berger, Rene A. & Brudence C. Sappington, William D. Auburn, Mary E. & Charles L. do Prudence C. Berger 1661 Pine 73860 S. Desert Greens Drive 73770 Desert Greens S. La Habra, CA 90631 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Desert, CA 92260 I 2 620 292 022 620 293 011 620 293 020 Skeans, Edward J. & Betty Lou Suboter, Louis & Joyce M. Whitlock, Thomas A. & Sybal J. 73870 S. Desert Greens Drive 73962 Munn Circle 3292 Oak Knoll Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Los Alamitos, CA 90720 620 292 023 620 293 012 620 293 021 Karns, Donald Horsey, David L. & Carol D. Stradley, Royce & Columbina 2712 Oak Knoll Drive 73982 Munn Circle 4140 Fair Avenue, #8 Los Alamitos, CA 90720 Palm Desert, CA 92260 North Hollywood, CA 91602 620 292 024 620 293 013 620 293 022 Roscoe, Vincent J. & Mary R. Glaubach, Nathan, & Elsie, Sawlsville, Randy L. & Linda D. 6036 S. Bruce Street 1746 Ashland Avenue 20126 Drasin Drive Las Vegas, NV 89119 Santa Monica, CA 90405 Canyon Country, CA 91351 620 292 025 620 293 014 620 293 023 Gagnon, Linda M. Calia, Joseph W. & Lorraine T. Bankoff, Jacqueline Hutchins, Marian P. 32112 Via Alicia 73901 S. Desert Greens Drive 73900 S. Desert Greens Drive San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Desert, CA 92260 620 292 026 620 293 015 620 293 024 Hamilton, Bilue Beatrice Korff, Raymond M. & Irene M. Bankoff, Jacqueline & Walter Clarence 73943 Munn Circle 73901 S. Desert Greens Drive 73900 S. Desert Greens Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Desert, CA 92260 620 292 027 620 293 016 620 293 025 Gormsen, Bette S. Curry, Robert D. Grimm, Anthony E. 70 Maximo Way 73923 Munn Circle 73881 S. Desert Greens Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Desert, CA 92260 620 292 028 620 293 017 620 293 026 Light, Everett H. & Virginia Schmidt, Edward L. & Kay F. Russo, Gerald & Madane Reinsch, Harry O. & Helen M. 17351 Frans Lane 13585 Valleyheart Drive 73948 S. Desert Greens Drive Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Sherman Oaks, CA 91423 Palm Desert, CA 92260 620 292 029 620 293 018 620 293 027 Soykin, William & Doris H. Barker, Charles R. & Lola G. McCarty, John R. & Helen K. 73968 S. Desert Greens Drive 1178 N. Glendora Avenue 73861 S. Desert Greens Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 Covina, CA 91724 Palm Desert, CA 92260 620 293 010 620 293 019 620 293 028 Kovich, Harry & Dorothy Manville, Katherine C. Stillman, Fenwick & Priscilla B. 73942 Munn Circle 7848 Broadmoor Drive 73851 S. Desert Greens Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 Orange, CA 92669 Palm Desert, CA 92260 II 3 III yQypoW,a260 I I � II 1 620 293 029 622 050 005 622 050 013 Dobson, Kenneth & Mary Ellen Linder, David O. & Barbara M. I Davis, Egbert H. & Joan F. 73841 S. Desert Greens Drive 41776 Armanac Court 41637 Armanac Court Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Desert, CA 92260 622 020 015 622 050 006 622 050 014 Alacano, Enes Sam & Kathleen Warren, Joe T. & Mary E. Kratt, Valah M. 2015 Terrace Circle 1 41777 Armanac Court 41617 Armanac Court Elko, NV 89801 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Desert, CA 92260 622 020 016 622 050 007 622 050 015 Alacano, Enes Sam & Kathleen Nethery, Donald Martin Hayden, Francis A. & Bernadette 2015 Terrace Circle & Carolyn Florence 41597 Armanac Court Elko, NV 89801 11601 Wilshire BI, 11th Floor Palm Desert, CA 92260 Los Angeles, CA 90025 622 020 017 D. Martin Nethery, Inc. 622 050 016 Alacano, Enes Sam & Kathleen c/o Lund & Guttry Popick, Walter & Marilyn 2015 Terrace Circle P. O. Box 2714 41577 Armanac Court Elko, NV 89801 Palm Springs, CA 92263 Palm Desert, CA 92260 622 020 048 622 050 008 622 050 017 Western Community Dev. DBA Endicott, Jill & Charles L. Harris, Jean L. San Tropez Apartments 41737 Armanac Court 41557 Armanac Court c!o Monarch Properties, Inc. Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Desert, CA 92260 P. O. Box 8150 Newport Beach, CA 92658 L 622 050 001 622 050 009 622 050 018 Mc Cullough, Perry Parent, Richard & Shirley Warne, John L. & Marjory 41696 Armanac Court 41717 Armanac Court 2917 SW West View Circle Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Lake Oswego, OR 97034 622 050 002 622 050 010 622 050 019 P & H Investments Holtom, Herbert T. & Gloria S. Sweeney, Robert M. Sr., P. O. Box 1450 760 Cavan Lane 602 Lake Superior Lane Arlington, VA 22210 Glendora, CA 91740 Boulder City, NV 89005 i I t 622 050 003 622 050 011 622 050 020 McDaniel, Francis & Florence Newman, Jeffrey E. & Sherry M. Gruver, Don A. & Virginia A. 343 Teton Circle 4020 Chester Drive i 41516 Armanac Court Placentia, CA 92670 Glenview, IL 60025 Palm Desert, CA 92260 i 622 050 004 622 050 012 622 050 021 Smith, Dewayne & Elizabeth Warzin, Fred Angrisani, Joseph & Rose Marie 41756 Armanac Court 41657 Armanac Court 41536 Armanac Court Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Desert, CA 92260 -- - _ t 4 M2yEoww2lab I I I I 622 050 022 622 050 031 622 050 040 Neiman, Robert M. & Suzette A. Kennedy, William James & Taylor, Deanna 17503 Rancho Drive Angela Mae 73740 Calla Bisque Encino, CA 91316 9520 Oakland Road SW Palm Desert, CA 92260 Calgary Alb, Canada T2V 489 622 050 023 622 050 032 622 050 041 Evans, Harry E. & Claire M. Silverman, Bernard & Caroline Beal, Josephine M. 51 Parkwood Court 1900 Ave. of The Stars, #2440 73750 Calle Bisque Racini, WI 53402 Los Angeles, CA 90067 Palm Desert, CA 92260 f 622 050 024 622 050 033 622 050 042 Sarapuk, Jaroslua & Olga Cicchini, Joseph & Suzanne Berg, Shirley M. 2263 Sloan Drive 41515 Navarre Court 73760 Calle Bisque Laverne, CA 91750 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Desert, CA 92260 1 622 050 025 622 050 034 622 050 043 Alekel, Dennis A. & Judith D. Lund, John C. & Donna Marcus, Penny M. 1840 Las Canas Lane 41514 Navarre Court 467 Denslow Avenue Fullerton, CA 92633 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Los Angeles, CA 90049 I 622 050 026 622 050 035 622 050 044 Block, James F. & Raymond W. Bono, Josephine, Cf. Moroni, James Lawrence & 316 N. Maryland Avenue, #106 230 West Longden Dolores Marie Glendale, CA 91206 Arcadia, CA 91006 73780 Calle Bisque Palm Desert, CA 92260 622 050 027 622 050 036 622 050 045 Farinella, Charles & Blanche Stuclkhardt, Kay Blundell Circo, Nanette M. 41635 Navarre Court 2364 Lochridge Place 73790 Calle Bisque Palm Desert, CA 92260 Escondido, CA 92026 Palm Desert, CA 92260 1 622 050 028 622 050 037 622 050 046 Pierce, William L. & Xandra X. Bachrach, Sheldon Jay Denman, Alice L. 5844 112th Plance, NE & Cathy Wright 41704 Navarre Court Kirkland, WA 98033 41594 Navarre Court Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Desert, CA 92260 622 050 029 622 050 038 622 050 047 Leaver, George E. & Mary Joan Lane, Ivan & Stacey F. Langner, Roger L. & Claudia J. 41595 Navarre Court 1085 Carolyn Way 41714 Navarre Court Palm Desert, CA 92260 Beverly Hills, CA 90210 Palm Desert, CA 92260 I 622 050 030 622 050 039 622 050 048 Strobel, Jack R. & Carlene Y. Stein, Ellen & Theodore Jr., Griffith, Ronald W. & Lindsey 3130 Mama Avenue 7334 Topanga Canyon, #203 41724 Navarre Court Long Beach, CA 90808 Canoga Park, CA 91303 Palm Desert, CA 92260 uzyCow,u2pE 5 I 622 050 049 622 050 058 622 050 067 Frank, Rodman A. Rubin, Leonoard M. & Karin A. Proctor, Dorothea M. P. O. Box 3547 41735 Navarre Court 41645 Navarre Court Palm Desert, CA 92260 ! Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Desert, CA 92260 !I i I { 622 050 050 622 050 059 622 050 068 Asp, David E. Lindquist, Barbara Casa Blanca Owners Association P. O. Box 3124 41725 Navarre Court Go Kanne Stephen Land Co. Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Desert, CA 92260 11500 West Olympic Place 4 4 Los Angeles, CA 90064 622 050 051 622 050 060 622 051 001 Ofee, Ross J. & Beverly X Holm, Richard P. & Arlene J. Moroni, James L. & Dolores M. 41754 Navarre Court 41715 Navarre Court 73800 Calle Bisque Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Desert, CA 92260 622 050 052 622 050 061 622 051 002 Coughlin, W. Ronald & Julia I. Glantz, Shirley Eblowitz, Bernard, & Rhoda, 41764 Navarre Court 41705 Navarre Court 20 Lafayette Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 622 050 053 622 050 062 622 051 003 Lumsden, Richard A. & Doris M. Murata, Kris, Fiedler, James N. & Laurel W. 2540 Wilt Road 11825 NE 75th 119 Via Koran Fallbrook CA 92028 Kirkland, WA 98033 Newport Beach, CA 92663 }} 622 050 054 622 050 063 622 051 004 Kerns, Jack C. & Victoria L. Wold, Albert & Beverly M. Brumer, Max & Ronnie Ellen 41775 Navarre Court 41685 Navarre Court 7 Burmington Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Manalapan, NJ 07726 622 050 055 622 050 064 622 051 005 Concordia Federal Bank Williams, Fred M. & Betty L. ! Miller, Robert G. 2320 Thornton Road Kessler, Carl cto K & B Lansing, IL 60438 22837 Ventura Boulevard, #201 6379 Clark Avenue Woodland Hills, CA 91364 Dublin, CA 94566 622 050 056 622 050 065 622 051 006 Stevens, Harriet A. Deroche, William & Irma Louise Baldwin, Clarence G. 41755 Navarre Court 41665 Navarre Court Box 32 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Mayne Island, Canada, VON2J0 f 622 050 057 622 050 066 f 622 051 007 Hannah, Maryjo Baca, Raymond & Dorothy Karsh, Nathan 41745 Navarre Court 425 W. Avenue 42 P. O. Box 82656 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Los Angeles, CA 90045 San Diego, CA 92138 i V1yao+Rw2.hb ! 8 j 622 051 008 622 051 017 622 051 026 Barnes, Daniel J. Kapuano, Mathilde Fishbein, Stuart Bernard 41613 Aventine Court 13245D Fiji Way & Janice Merle Palm Desert, CA 92260 j Marina Del Rey, CA 90202 18755 Hatteras Street, #15 I 1 Tarzana, CA 91356 622 051 009 1 622 051 018 622 051 027 Ortega, John II & Vonna Wilkins Flamme, Douglas E. & Ona Mae Singer, Frank, & Therese Renee 41593 Aventine Court 705 3240 66th Avenue SW 23520 Berdon Palm Desert, CA 92260 Calgary Alb, Canada T3E 6M5 Woodland Hills, CA 91367 622 051 010 622 051 019 622 051 028 Komonyi, Geza Dinkel, Beatrice Joyce Traunweiser, John Adams & P. O. Box 1992 c/o Robert Stanley Dinkel Frances Geraldine Palm Springs, CA 92263 2233 131h Street, SW 141 2345 Cedar Hill 1 Calgary Alb, Canada T2T3P8 I Victoria BC Canada V8P 5M8 622 051 011 622 051 020 622 051 029 Meltzner, Paul J. & Ruthe H. Fisher, Matt Kurtz, Swoosie 2513 Angekxest Drive 41631 Colada Court 4404 Placidia Avenue Hacienda Heights, CA 91745 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Toluca Lake, CA 91602 622 051 012 622 051 021 622 051 030 Nordblom, Lorraine E. Stikich, Michael Lucas, Jeanette J. 5243 Co Road 151 & Deborah Marie 41570 Colada Court Mound, MN 55364 41611 Colada Court Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Desert, CA 92260 622 051 013 622 051 022 622 051 031 Cherniak, Leon & Charlotte M. Winchel, Leo H. & Beverly M. Carlson Family Partnership 5707 Natick Avenue 1817 Avenida San Lorenzo 4955 NE 85th Street Van Nuys, CA 91411 1 Fullerton, CA 92633 Seattle, WA 98115 J 622 051 014 622 051 023 622 051 032 Halper, Lewis & Fay Ankeny, David & Geraldine Jean Mohr, Alvin L. & Lila L. 27938 Ridgebrook Court 10058 Lesterford Avenue P. O Box 10 Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90274 Downey, CA 90240 Fargo, ND 58103 622 051 015 622 051 024 622 051 033 Albertson, William & Linda Gerhardt, Jack H. & Juleen L. Woodcrest Development of 13050 Destino Lane 41551 Colada Court Orange Count Inc. Cerritos, CA 90701 Palm Desert, CA 92260 17911 Mitchel Avenue Irvine, CA 92714 I 622 051 016 622 051 025 622 051 034 Jarriel, Mathilde Kapuano Gallo, J. Peter McNee, Douglas Miles & Keith G. 41531 Colada Court & Margueritha Rebecca 4758G La Villa Marina Palm Desert, CA 92260 41650 Colada Court Marina Del Rey, CA 90292 Palm Desert, CA 92260 I I i 622 051 035 622 051 044 622 051 053 Friederang, Fred & Theresa Marlowe, Joy Nathan, Richard J. & Debra A. 41670 Colada Court P. O. Box 596 i 33536 Valle Road Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Desert, CA 92260 San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 622 051 036 622 051 045 622 051 054 Singer, Aaron & Loretta M. Farrell, Dennis M. Troy Mintz, Rosemarie 2602 El Capitan 41691 Colada Court 10627 Ashton Av, #305 Arcadia, CA 91006 Palm Desert, CA 92260 : Los Angeles, CA 90024 i 622 051 037 622 051 046 622 051 055 James A. Love Holdings Ltd. Gumhold, Walter H. & Verla P. Babcock, Bernard H. II cto James Love P. O. Box 888 1280 Virginia Road 403 318 26th Av SW Woodruff, W 54568 San Marino, CA 91108 Calgary Alb, Canada T2S2T9 i 622 051 038 622 051 047 622 051 056 Kurtz, Frank & Margo Meyer, Daniel T. & Marilyn J. Sanderman, Maurice & Myra L. 4404 Placidia Avenue 8872 Ann Cross Drive Go Micky Sanderman Toluca Lake, CA 91602 Garden Grove, CA 92641 1 880 Great Elm Lane Highland Park, IL 60035 622 051 039 622 051 048 622 051 057 Barker, Norman & Elizabeth Vanvlack Dorothy Mendelsohn, Bernard & Irma H. 41750 Colada Court 41662 Aventine Court 41752 Aventine Court Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Desert, CA 92260 } 1 622 051 040 622 051 049 622 051 058 Onley, Albert W. & Eleanor E. Schweit, George & Catherine Mercer, Herbert Martin 41770 Colada Court 41672 Aventine Court 41762 Aventine Court Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Desert, CA 92260 1 622 051 041 622 051 050 622 051 059 Bright, Joyce Mary Domer, Francis & Barbara Molle, Marjorie J. 41771 Colada Court 20511 Wayne Avenue 9405 E. Doubletree Ranch 238 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Torrance, CA 90503 Scottsdale, AZ 85258 1 1 622 051 042 622 051 051 622 051 060 Smith, Marion Burrows, Plinneke, Mark A. Davis, Daphnie Evelyn 1425 Tomahawk Drive 294 Waverly St, #4 6725 Lachine Court Salt Lake City, UT 84103 Menlo Park, CA 94025 Calgary Alb Canada T3E 6E7 622 051 043 622 051 052 622 051 061 Wallace, John W. McArthur, Margaret R. Mills, Helen Irene 41731 Colada Court 41702 Aventine Court 41763 Aventine Court Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Desert, CA 92260 t Palm Desert, CA 92260 I `aymwn.ru.n i e 622 051 062 624 021 022 624 021 031 Lundberg, George & Carolyn Pawlowski, Stanley & Theresa Shaw, David & Eileen Margaret 2047 Port Whitby 1433 Janeen Way 24 Acapulco Drive Newport Beach, CA 92660 Anaheim, CA 92801 Palm Desert, CA 92260 i 1 622 051 063 624 021 023 624 021 032 Moe, Gilbert A. Lescander, Robin Merlo Reaume, Bradley & Lorraine 41743 Aventine Court 1 760 W. Huntington Drive, #5 810 S. Michigan Boulevard Palm Desert, CA 92260 1 Arcadia, CA 91006 Pasadena, CA 91107 622 051 064 624 021 024 624 021 033 Lee, Laura B., Ben Johnson, Robert & Jeannette Markowitz, Harold Jules, P. O. Box 4382 Terminal Annex 9 Acapulco Drive & Gloria P. Los Angeles, CA 90051 Palm Desert, CA 92260 2159 Rancho Culebra Covina, CA 91724 622 051 065 1 624 021 025 624 021 034 Kraft, Christel Morgan, Rosa W. & Lisa M. Reed, Tommy L. & Rose Marie, 41723 Aventine Court 4537 Drexel Boulevard 2455 Camino del Sol Palm Desert, CA 92260 Chicago, IL 60653 Fullerton, CA 92633 622 051 066 624 021 026 624 021 035 Lambert, Charles & Danuta Williams, Robert T. Guy, Shirley L. 41713 Aventine Court 13 Acapulco Drive 4 La Paz Lane Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Desert, CA 92260 1 622 051 067 624 021 027 624 021 036 Sarto, Herman, & Ann Tuttle, Keith N. & Mary R. Wahs, Joan Patricia 1119 S. Oakhurst, #1 P. O. Box 3329 2 La Paz Lane Los Angeles, CA 90035 Rancho Santa Fe, CA 92067 Palm Desert, CA 92260 622 051 068 624 021 028 624 021 037 Casa Blanca Owners Assoc. Thompson, Robert B. Elsee, John B. & Nina H. c/o Kanne Stephen LA Co. 534 21st Place Route 4, Box 5025 11500 W. Olympic Place, #4 Santa Monica, CA 90402 Rathdrum, ID 83858 Los Angeles, CA 90064 624 021 020 624 021 029 624 021 038 Mooney, Robert E. & Paula Neish, David B. & Anne C. Kumick, Jordan & Geraldine 1 Acapulco 31641 Via Quixote 20835 Nordhoff Street Palm Desert, CA 92260 San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 Chatsworth, CA 91311 624 021 021 624 021 030 624 021 039 Rueb, Gunter K. Thornton, Robert & Frieda Lynch, Don & Marilyn 23242 Mindanao Circle 2708 Patti Lane 3900 The Strand Laguna Niguel, CA 92677 Rogers, AR 72756 Manhattan Beach, CA 90266 azyeo.,,.rzi.n III i I I T 624 021 040 624 021 049 11 624 022 003 Rosenberg, Harvey & Geraldine Fleschner, Emil P. & Peggene A. Simpson, Robert & Florence 7 La Paz Lane 3275 Hutton Drive 14 Sunlight Palm Desert, CA 92260 Beverly Hills, CA 90201 Irvine, CA 92715 624 021 041 624 021 050 624 022 004 Hadeler, Robert & Sarah Rolfe Ward, Clayburn, J. & Carolyn A. Dehoop, Robert & Haydee 3275 Hutton Drive 2038 N. Redding Way 6761 Skyview Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90210 Upland, CA 91786 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 624 021 042 624 021 051 624 022 005 Shea, John Martin & Marion A. PD Racquet Club HOA Ames, Martin 260 Newport Center Drive c/o McLain Development Co., 9 Verde Way Newport Beach, CA 92660 1470 Newport Beach, d od., DeeDee Palm Desert, CA 92260 2660 624 021 043 624 021 052 624 022 006 Wlaberg, Philip O. & Pamela B. PD Racquet Club HOA Lee, Jean 13 La Paz Lane c/o McLain Development Co., 4030 Mariner Avenue Palm Desert, CA 92260 1470 Jamboree Newport Beach, CA 92660ee Westlake Village, CA 91361 624 021 044 624 021 053 624 022 007 Evans, Erin PD Racquet Club HOA Wilkinson, Don & Katharine 1901 La Mesa Drive Go McLain Development Co., 10891 Furling Drive Santa Monica, CA 90402 1470 Jamboree Rd., DeeD a Santa Ana, CA 92705 Newport Beach, 624 021 045 624 021 056 624 022 008 Bums, Stephanie PD Racquet Club HOA Myers, Helen A. P. O. Box 667 cto McLain Development Co., 580 Paseo de Luna Rd., d Corona del Mark, CA 92625 1470 Jamboree Newport Beach, d.,92660 a Anaheim, CA 92807 624 021 046 624 021 057 624 022 009 Thomas, Ward J. & Lois J. McLain Western #2 Saurenman, Mary Louise 30870 Kirk Lane 1470 Jamboree Road 1907 Mairemont Franklin, MI 48025 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Walnut, CA 91789 I 624 021 047 624 022 001 624 022 010 Western Federal Savings & Loan Stein, Sherley Silverman, Jerome & Greta Go Jennifer Trinidad 1 Verde Way 5524 Caminito Herminia P. O. Box 9959 Palm Desert, CA 92260 La Jolla, CA 92037 Marina del Rey, CA 90295 624 021 048 624 022 002 624 022 011 Duque, Henry M. Hochman, Lee A. Howell, Cecil L. & Doreen 26074 Mulberry Lane 3 Verde Way 21 Verde Way Los Altos Hills, CA 94022 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Desert, CA 92260 10 I�yeow,w2tab _ 0 624 022 012 Belden, Josiah G. & Signe M. 23 Verde Way Palm Desert, ,CA 92260 624 022 013 Carpentier, Patricia R. 10762 Wilson Alta Loma, CA 91701. 624 022 014 Hall, William P. 4811 Roma Court Marina del Rey, CA 90292 624 022 015 McGinnes, Matthew R. 661 1/2 W. Glenoaks Glendale, CA 91205 l t